Loading...
City Council Minutes 08-12-1985MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL August 12, 1985 Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Dan Blonigen, Jack Maxwell. Members Absent: None 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of Minutes. Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of the special meeting held July 29 and August 7, and the regular meeting held July 22, 1985. 3. Citizens Comments Mr. Mel Wolters, Developer in the Meadows residential subdivision plat, appeared before the Council requesting partial reimbursement from the City for part of his ponding area construction costs within the Meadows subdivision because of the Par West subdivision draining storm water into the Meadows pond. Mr. Walters noted that the developer of the Par West subdivision paid approximately $1,900 to the City of Monticello to be allowed to drain storm water into this pond and he felt he should be reimbursed this amount if the pond is large enough to accept other subdivisions water. The Council Members suggested this item be placed on a future agenda with additional background information before a decision could be made. 4. Consideration of Pursuing Acquisition of the Assembly of God Church Building. Previously, the Council has discussed the possibility of the City acquiring the vacated Assembly of God Church building on 4th Street for the possible relocation of the Senior Citizen's Center. The asking price for the Church at that time was very high and the urgency of relocating the Senior Citizen's Center was not present, so the proposal was not seriously considered by the City. Several months ago, businesses in the block where the Senior Citizen's Center is currently located, expressed interest in expanding and inquired as to the availability of the Senior Center property. At that point, the City revived inquiries with respect to the Church building on 4th Street for relocation purposes, but the asking price still was considered too high at $200,000. -1- Council Minutes - August 12, 1985 Since that time, the business interest in expanding on the Senior Citizen's Center property has diminishedy and it appears there is no urgency for the Senior Citizen's Center to be relocated. As a result of these events and the high asking price for the Church property, it was the consensus of the Council to drop all negotiations at this time for the Church building. 5. Consideration of Change Order #1 for Project 85-1 Interceptor Sewer. LaTour Construction Company, contractor for the recently completed interceptor sewer crossing of Highway 25 requested a change order in the amount of $4,500 for the excavation of an additional three feet of material and extra dewatering cost due to what the contractor felt was an error in the plans prepared by the City Engineer. LaTour Construction noted that the plan elevations were incorrect and there was an additional three feet of excavation that was necessary and the additional cost to the contractor was $6,300, but the contractor agreed that if he had known of the extra excavation at the bidding process his bid would have reflected approximately $4,500 more in cost. It is recommended by Public Works Director, John Simola, that the extra $4,500 was reasonable and recommended that the change order be initiated. Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Jack Maxwell, and asked to be carried to approve Change Order #1 on the 85-1 Interceptor Sewer Project in the amount of $4,500 to LaTour Construction Company. 6. Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Granting Preliminary Approval to a Proposal for the Sale of Industrial Revenue Bonds - Applicant, Veit Construction. Mr. John Gries, attorney representing Veit Construction Company, appreared before the Council requesting approval of a Resolution granting preliminary approval to a proposal for Industrial Revenue Bonds for the construction of a 33,000 square foot grocery and retail building to be located on property just north of the cemetary along Highway 25 near the railroad tracks. Initially, Veit Construction discussed with the City the devlopment proposal and the use of tax increment financing for this property due to its severe topographical and foundation problems of the site. During their feasibility study on the project, developers decided to request Industrial Revenue Bonds also be approved for the project to help lower the cost of financing. -2- Council Minutes - August 12, 1985 Since Industrial Revenue Bonds are only issued now after an approved allocation is granted from the State, the developers requested approval of a preliminary resolution which would allow them to request money through the State Pool. The preliminary resolution would in no way commit the City Council to approve the final application. The deadline for requesting allocation from the State Pool is September 1, 1985. Additional details to be worked out should the Council proceed with Industrial Revenue Bond issues concern the extension of 6th Street at the south end of the property and whether the Streets should be vacated for additional parking area for the development or whether the City should retain the street for right-of-way purposes. In addition, all 19 points concerning the creation of jobs, tax base increase, and the but for clause which determines that the project would not proceed without Industrial Revenue Bonds must be established before the allocation can be approved by the State. Some Council Members were concerned over approving a commercial project such as this for a grocery business that is already established in town when a similar proposal was made previously for a motel that was not approved because it wasn't shown that a need existed for additional motels. Since the granting of a preliminary approval without holding a public hearing does not imply consent that the project will be approved at a later date by the Council, a motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Fran Fair to adopt the resolution granting preliminary approval and allowing the developer to apply for IRB's through the State Allocation Pool. Voting in favor was everybody but Dan Blonigen who was opposed. See Resolution 1985 #13. 7. Consideration of Acquisition of Various Public Works Equipment. Public Works Director, John Simola, reviewed with the Council on various equipment items that had been budgeted for during 1985 and which he recommended be approved for purchase at this time. Motion was made by Maxwell, seconded by Bill Fair and asked to be carried to authorize the purchase of the following equipment as recommended by the Public Works Director. TOTAL ITEM SUPPLIER COST (1) 2 -Door Operators Automatice Door $ 954 1/2 H.P. - 14' x 14' Monticello (2) Pipe Locator Davis Water 1,545 Water Lines. Brooklyn Park (3) Alarm System Sentry Systems 1,205 Hi & Lo Water Hugo, MN -3- Council Minutes - August 12, 1985 8. Consideration of Authorizing Annexation Study. Because of various reasons, including the possible location of a water tower in the orderly annexation area of the Monticello Township, the City Council has considered the possibility of annexing all or a portion of the orderly annexation area. The consulting City Planner, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban Inc., along with the consulting City Engineer, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates presented previously a proposal for a review of the orderly annexation area and a study to determine whether the area is now or is about to become urban in nature and suitable for annexation. The estimated cost of the study presented by the consulting planner and engineer was estimated at $40-45,000. The Council again discussed the merits of pursuing a study of the orderly annexation area, or whether to drop the issue entirely at this time. Council Member, Blonigen, was not certain whether the City should be initiating annexation of any of the township area at this time but is more concerned with the City having more input into the planning and regulating of future subdivisions, etc. within the townships OA area. This additional input would help create smaller lots for residential developments that would be more suitable for connection to City utilities if and when they become part of the City limits. In addition, Mr. Blonigen felt that annexation at this time may result in more cost for the City than the tax base generated. Council Members, Bill and Fran Fair, felt the study proposed by the consultants is necessary to update the information that is necessary to determine whether annexation is appropriate now or in the near future. city Administrator, Tom Eidem, noted that the review of the orderly annexation area as proposed by the consultants should not be considered just a planning study but as a study to determine whether or not annexation should be pursued at the present time. Mr. Eidem noted that if the Council authorized the study to be commenced, the Council should be ready to act on the recommendations of the study which will either be to pursue annexation or to drop annexation at this time. If the consensus of the Council is at this time not to pursue annexation, the study would be of no use to the City. WAM TOTAL ITEM SUPLIER COST (4) Aux. Heater Olson Elec. $ 720 With 50' Cord Monticello (5) Used Port. NB Instruments 11993 Flow Meter Horsham, Pa. TOTAL $62417 8. Consideration of Authorizing Annexation Study. Because of various reasons, including the possible location of a water tower in the orderly annexation area of the Monticello Township, the City Council has considered the possibility of annexing all or a portion of the orderly annexation area. The consulting City Planner, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban Inc., along with the consulting City Engineer, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates presented previously a proposal for a review of the orderly annexation area and a study to determine whether the area is now or is about to become urban in nature and suitable for annexation. The estimated cost of the study presented by the consulting planner and engineer was estimated at $40-45,000. The Council again discussed the merits of pursuing a study of the orderly annexation area, or whether to drop the issue entirely at this time. Council Member, Blonigen, was not certain whether the City should be initiating annexation of any of the township area at this time but is more concerned with the City having more input into the planning and regulating of future subdivisions, etc. within the townships OA area. This additional input would help create smaller lots for residential developments that would be more suitable for connection to City utilities if and when they become part of the City limits. In addition, Mr. Blonigen felt that annexation at this time may result in more cost for the City than the tax base generated. Council Members, Bill and Fran Fair, felt the study proposed by the consultants is necessary to update the information that is necessary to determine whether annexation is appropriate now or in the near future. city Administrator, Tom Eidem, noted that the review of the orderly annexation area as proposed by the consultants should not be considered just a planning study but as a study to determine whether or not annexation should be pursued at the present time. Mr. Eidem noted that if the Council authorized the study to be commenced, the Council should be ready to act on the recommendations of the study which will either be to pursue annexation or to drop annexation at this time. If the consensus of the Council is at this time not to pursue annexation, the study would be of no use to the City. WAM Council Minutes - August 12, 1985 Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Bill Fair to authorize the consulting planner and engineer to prepare a review and study of the orderly annexation area as to whether the City should pursue annexation. Voting in favor was Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Arve Grimsmo, opposed were Maxwell and Blonigen. 9. Consideration of granting an Off -sale 3.2 Beer License - Riverroad Plaza. Motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Maxwell and asked to be carried to approve the _issuance of a non -intoxicating malt liquor off -sale license to the Riverroad Plaza Convenience Store. 10. Adjourn. Rick Wolfstelle ; Assistant Administrator -5-