Loading...
Planning Commission Agenda 03-05-2019AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, March 5th, 2019 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Katie Peterson Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Jacob Thunander, Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Regular Meeting Minutes — February 5, 2019 C. Citizen Comments D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda E. Consideration to approve agenda 2. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5 and Chapter 8, Section 4 related to use, standards and definitions for event centers, places of public assembly, personal services, and commercial recreation - indoor Applicant: City of Monticello 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration to appoint one representative to the 2040 Monticello Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan Proposal Review Sub-Committee B. Consideration of an update on Rental Ordinance Review and Department of Building Safety & Code Enforcement Update C. Consideration of the Community Development Directors Report 4. Added Items 5. Adjournment MINUTE S REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 5th, 2018 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Katie Council Liaison Present Staff Present: 1. General Business A. Call to Order Peterson Charlotte Gabler Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Ron Hackenmueller B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Re�ular Meetin� Minutes — Januarv 2, 2018 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 2, 2019. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. C. Citizen Comments None. `� D. Consideration of addin� items to the a�enda Brad Fyle asked for an update on the Briggs Properties downtown apartment complex. E. Consideration to approve a�enda MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. 2. Public Hearin�s A. Public Hearin� - Consideration of a request for Variance to Chapter 4.5 Si�ns for a fortv (40) foot pvlon si�n Applicant: Scenic Sign Steve Grittman explained that the variance request at 112 Thomas Circle (Twin City Staffing) as indicated in the staff report. He noted that the neighboring business — Morton Builder's sign obscured their sign heading west. Grittman explained that the current sign is 30 feet and located in the Freeway Bonus Overlay District which allows pylon signs to be 32 feet in height. The applicant was seeking an eight foot variance or ten feet higher than the existing. Grittman reviewed the statutory obligations for approving variances such as identifying practical difficulties to the use of the property or conditions. Staff recommended denial of the variance request and identified alternative opportunities for the sign that would not require a variance. Examples include raising the sign two feet to code, relocating the sign further to the west or applying wall signs. Planning Commission Minutes — Febri�ar�� 5, 2019 Page 1 � 4 John Alstad asked if the Morton Builder's sign could be lowered. Grittman confirmed if the property owner agreed, but not something that the City could impose on them. Sam Murdoff asked if the Morton Builder's sign was in constructed first. Grittman believed so. Charlotte Gabler asked if MnDOT would have to review the sign. Grittman declined and stated that the sign was on-site and would not require review. Brad Fyle asked if Morton Buildings sign was legal. Grittman believed so. Signs that were approved through a PUD were discussed. Alstad asked how long the Twin City Staffing sign has been in place. Ron Hackenmueller indicated this year. Brad Fyle opened the public hearing. John DeZurik, Scenic Sign, Lisa Sefras, Twin City Staffing Mike Miner, Twin City Staffing, introduced themselves. DeZurik summarized that they looked at alternatives for location of the sign, but felt the current location was practical. He requested that the sign be allowed to be above Morton Builder's for readability and the cost the business has spent on the sign already. Sefras indicated that Morton Builder's submitted a letter indicating that they were supportive of the Twin City Staffing sign being raised. She indicated that the Morton Builder's sign is also blocked if you are heading east. Sefras also indicated the difficulty of moving the sign due to a large drainage and utility easement that exists on the north side of the lot. Sefras indicated that they have space that is leasable and they would like to preserve the wall sign space for a possible tenant. Sefras read a letter that was submitted by the possible tenant (Twin Star Equipment) in support of the variance request. She identified other existing signs that are larger than Twin City Staffing sign. Mike Miner indicated the unique configuration of the lot. Brad Fyle asked if there were obstructions on the west side of their lot. The applicants confirmed that there were trees. Katie Peterson asked what the height of the sign would need to be to be above Morton Builders sign. The applicants indicated that an additional six to ten feet would be requested. Sam Murdoff questioned why the location of the sign was not better evaluated by the applicant before construction. Planning Commission Minutes — Febri�ar�� 5, 2019 Page 2 � 4 Simpson asked if the current sign has caused a hardship to the business. Miner indicated that they work with fifteen different businesses in Monticello and believe they could expand their business with the additional height of the building. Simpson also asked when applicants come into their business, if they are asked how they found out about the j ob opportunities. Miner indicated that since they have only been in Monticello a month, that the number was not representative. Murdoff asked about the drainage and utility easement. The Planning Commission continued to discuss the item. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed. SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PG2019-007, DENYING THE VARIANCE FOR SIGN HEIGHT, BASED ON THE FINDINGS 1N SAID RESOLUTION, AND AS MAY BE OTHERWISE STATED BY THE COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING. JOHN ALSTAD SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. B. Public Hearin� - Consideration of a request for amendment to Monticello Zonin� Ordinance Chapter 5 and Chapter 8, Section 4 related to use, standards and definitions for event centers, places of public assemblv, personal services, and commercial recreation - indoor Applicant: Citv of Monticello Angela Schumann asked that the Planning Commission continue the Public Hearing to the March meeting and table action. She indicated that staff would like to review any proposed ordinance changes with the City Attorney. Charlotte Gabler asked if staff would also review the proposed ordinance in regards to the newly approved Central Community District standards. Schumann confirmed. SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO TABLE ACTION ON THE ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE MARCH STH, 2019 REGULAR MEETING. KATIE PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. 3. Re�ular A�enda A. Consideration of a review of the Special Use Overlav District Steve Grittman provided the review of the Special Use Overlay District. He noted the importance of reviewing the district annually. Staff did not recommend any changes to the district as a result of the 2018/2019 analysis Planning Commission Minutes — Febri�ar�� 5, 2019 Page 3 � 4 B. Consideration of an update on the 2040 Monticello Comprehensive Plan Angela Schumann indicated that she was requesting the Planning Commission's feedback on the draft version of the Request for Proposal (RFP) for an updated 2040 Monticello Comprehensive Plan. Schumann indicated that the last Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2008. Schumann indicated the need for an updated comprehensive plan due to future decisions that will greatly affect or change the community. Staff proposed a two phase process for the update. The first phase would include a future based scenario effort. Schumann indicated that community and stakeholder engagement would be critical for the first phase. The second phase of the plan would include traditional comprehensive planning. The new plan would revisit each of the chapters of the existing plan, but would add a chapter titled Community Identity & Culture. Schumann explained the importance of the updated comprehensive plan for guiding the city especially in their Strategic Plan. The RFP was provided in the agenda packet. The plan was expected to be completed by 2020. Commissioner Murdoff noted that the timeline included might be optimistic. Schumann concurred. C. Consideration of the Communitv Development Directors Report Angela Schumann explained the Community Development Directors Report as indicated in the agenda. Schumann provided two additional items to the report. New Government Training Services (GTS) classes the Planning Commission may be interested in are available. Staff also received a notice from MnDOT regarding the I-94 expansion proj ect that would be occurring in the next year. An EAW would need to be completed and Planning Commissioners were requested to send any comments to staff. 4. Added Items Bri��s Rivertown Suites — The developer was expecting to begin building but ran into ground water. Construction is anticipated to begin in the spring again. 5. Adiournment SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:24 P.M. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander Approved: March 5, 2019 Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Planning Commission Minutes — Febri�ar�� 5, 2019 Page 4 � 4 Planning Commission Agenda: 02/OS/19 2A. Continued Public Hearin� - Consideration of a request for amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5 and Chapter 8, Section 4 related to use, standards and definitions for event centers, places of public assemblv, personal services, and commercial recreation — indoor. Applicant: Citv of Monticello (NAC) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff have prepared draft ordinance language relating to Event Centers as a specific use classification within the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission requested this language as an amendment consideration to better respond to related inquiries and provide use direction to interested developers. Staff have prepared initial language and analysis for the proposed ordinance amendment for Planning Commission review. Staff have also had an opportunity to discuss the draft amendment with the City's legal counsel. At this time, the proposed amendment is ready for Commission discussion and hearing. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance related to use, standards and definitions for event centers, places of public assembly, personal services, and commercial recreation — indoor, based on a finding that found that the proposed amendments will benefit the intent of the regulations and the process for application. 2. Motion to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance related to use, standards and definitions for event centers, places of public assembly, personal services, and commercial recreation — indoor with changes to the language as recommended by the Commission and based on a finding that found that the proposed amendments will benefit the intent of the regulations and the process for application.. Motion to recommend denial of the proposed ordinance related to use, standards and definitions for event centers, places of public assembly, personal services, and commercial recreation — indoor. 4. Motion to table action on the item. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance amendment, subj ect to any changes requested by the Commission. As noted in prior reports on this item, the current ordinance leaves a significant area of discretion as related to the classification of event- center type uses. Clarity is needed to reflect consistency with the Commission and Council's preferred direction these uses and for staff to be better prepared in working with proposals of this nature. The proposed ordinance provides the needed clarity within the use allowances and definitions as it relates to event centers and similar uses. Planning Commission Agenda: 02/OS/19 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A Memorandum — Northwest Associated Consultants B. Proposed Ordinance C. Ordinance Excerpts CITY OF MONTICELLO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DEFINING AND REGULATING EVENT CENTERS, PLACES OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY, AND RELATED LAND USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 5.1(A) — Use Table — Explanation of Use Table Structure is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.1(A) �e� Uses Not Provided for Within Zonin� Districts � In any zonin� district, whenever a proposed use is neither specifically allowed nor denied, the Communitv Development Department r�*.� r������' shall determine if the proposed use is comparable in potential activities and impacts to a use listed within the zonin� district and is acceptable related to land use compatibility, traffic, and/or nuisance issues and established conditions and standards relatin�to development of the use. Where such a determination is made, the requirements established for the listed use shall a�ply as minimum standards for the proposed use. Additional requirements mav be a�lied to address differences between the listed use and the proposed use. If no comparable use determination can be made, the use will be considered prohibited in which case an amendment to the ordinance text would be required to clarify if, where and how a proposed use could be established. Section 2. Section 5.2 — Use Specific Standards, is hereby amended as follows: (F)(6) (g) In the CCD, F-1 sub-district, the followin� conditions shall a�lv: Buildin� architecture shall be desi�ned to reflect retail street-level architecture as defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and detailed in the document "Embracin� Downtown Monticello." ii. Site plannin� shall minimize parkin� lot development adjacent to public areas in the district, includin� streets, pathwa�, and open spaces. Section 3. Section 5.2 — Use Specific Standards, is hereby amended as follows: . - � :...:,.,.:.... ., J. - :...�.�.,. Section 4. Section 8.4, Definitions, is hereby amended such that the definitions of the following terms shall read as follows: COMMLJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: Those departments assigned by the City�ge� Administrator to oversee the various aspects of development and zoning within the City. Such departments may include, but are not limited to planning zoning building safety, code enforcement and engineering. ENTERTAINIVIENT, INDOOR COMMERCIAL: An establishment providing completely enclosed recreation or entertainment activities. Accessory uses may include the preparation and serving of food or the sale of equipment related to the enclosed uses. T��'���'��' �� *'��� �'����*��� �'��"'�� Examples of indoor commercial entertainment businesses include bowling allevs, roller e� and ice-skating rinks, billiards halls, swimmin� pools, motion picture theaters, and �a�e� similar amusements. �''��� ���� �'^�� Indoor commercial entertainment uses do not include event centers or adult uses. ENTERTAINIVIENT, OUTDOOR COMMERCIAL: An establishment providing recreation or entertainment activities primarily occurring outdoors. Accessory uses may include the preparation and serving of food, the sale of equipment related to the outdoor uses, and complementary indoor entertainment facilities. Examples of outdoor commercial entertainment businesses include, but are not limited to, � golf driving ranges, sand volleyball courts, go-carts,� and miniature golf courses. �e Outdoor commercial entertainment uses does not include proj ectile weapon ranges (archery or shooting), sports stadiums or drive-in movie theaters. PLACE OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY: An institution or facility that congregations of people regularly attend to participate in or hold meetings, workshops, lectures, civic activities, religious services, and other similar activities, including buildings in which 2 such functions and activities are held. Places of public assemblv are characterized bX individuals arrivin� and departin� at re�,ularly scheduled times and do not include event centers. Common characteristics of blaces of bublic assemblv_ which differentiate such uses from event centers, mav include but are not limited to, the followin�: 1. Re�,ular activitv schedules 2. No displav and/or sale of retail commercial �oods or services 3. The �eneration of traffic at routine time periods 4. Predictable traffic volumes durin� activities 5. Locations that may be in commercial, industrial, or residential nei�hborhoods Section 5. Section 8.4, Definitions, is hereby amended to add the following: EVENT CENTER: A multi-purpose commercial venue (�ublic or privately-owned) used for the purposes of performances, trade shows, corporate functions, sportin� events, private receptions or parties, holida� at� herin�s or similar attractions. Common characteristics of event centers, which differentiate such uses from places of public assemblv_ often include but are not limited to_ the followin�: 1. Varied and/or irre�,ular activitv schedules � � 2. The displav and/or sale of retail commercial �oods 3. The �eneration of hi�h traffic volumes at varied time periods 4. Commercial activities and uses in coordination with the events 5. Locations in commercial or industrial nei�hborhoods 6. Alcohol service as licensed Accessory uses may include food preparation facilities, concessions, offices, museums, parks, athletic trainin� or practice facilities, stores, restaurants, structured parkin� facilities, and patron transportation facilities. Event centers do not include adult uses and places of public assembl� Section 6. Section 5.1, Table 5-1, is hereby amended to add the following: Section 7. Section 5.1, Table 5-lA, is hereby amended to add the following: Section 8. Section 52 (F) (14), Use-Specific Standards - Event Centers, is hereby added to read as follows: (14) Event Centers (a) Proximitv to Residential Uses. Propertv upon which event centers are located shall not abut residentiallv zoned propert� (b) Parkin�. Off-street parkin� for event centers shall be provided in in accordance with Section 4.8 of this Ordinance. (c) Event Size. Event Centers shall be allowed a maximum event size as specified bX the conditional use permit. (d) Number of Events. (i) Event Centers in the B-3 and B-4 District are not restricted in the number of events allowed unless restricted bv the conditional use permit. (ii) Event centers in the B-2 District mav be limited to certain davs or number of events bv the Citv Council ber the conditional use bermit. (e) Hours of Operation. i. Event centers are allowed to operate between the hours of 8:00 AM and 2:00 AM if located at least 200 feet from residentiallv zoned propertv, any dav of the week unless further limited or expanded bv the conditional use permit. ii. Event center locations less than 200 feet from residentiallv zoned property, hours of operation shall be between 8:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., unless further limited or expanded bv Citv Council per the conditional use permit. � (f) Noise Re�,ulations. Event centers shall be subj ect to the noise-related provisions of Cit.� (g) Food Re�ulations. Event centers mav serve food and bevera�es as an accessorX activitv in accordance with all a�licable Federal, State, and Citv re�,ulations. (h) Overni�ht accommodations. Overni�ht accommodations are not allowed. (i) Accessibilitv. All buildin�s used in conjunction with event centers shall meet applicable accessibility requirements imposed by State or Federal law. (j) Code Compliance. The buildin�(s) used for the event center shall meet anv and all a�plicable Federal, State, and local codes, includin� those which a�ply to sanitarv facilities. (k) Outdoor Events. All events shall take place within the event center buildin�(s), unless otherwise allowed in the zonin� district or Cit.� Section 9. Section 4.8, Off Street Parking Table 4-7, is hereby amended to add the following: TABLE 4-7: MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES BY USE Use Type Minimum # of Spaces and Additional Re uirements Commercial Uses Event Center One 1) parking space for each two and one-half (2.5) �uests, measured bv buildin� capacitv based on buildin� code limits of all areas used for the event, and one (1) parkin� space for each 200 square feet for areas devoted to food preparation, event stagin�, and other su ort activities. Section 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 11. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor ������li�d� ��r�����1��� 4����Oi�4A���dh ���t 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Monticello Planning Commission Angela Schumann, Community Development Director FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: February 28, 2019 RE: Monticello — Event Centers Ordinance Amendment FILE NO: 191.06 — 18.15 Attached to this memorandum is a draft ordinance related to the creation of a separate land use category labeled "Event Centers". Two primary changes have elevated event centers to the point where treating them as a separate land use category is helpful. First, the event center use has grown by expanding to new venues out from more traditional reception halls that were part of other public assembly venues. Common traditional venues have been churches or hotel "ballroom" types of facilities. Historically, zoning ordinances have accounted for larger events as a common accessory activity to these public assembly uses. Particular growth in the number of events seeking commercial facilities that may have been non-traditional locations has raised a potential conflict with merely assuming that events were a commonplace accessory activity. Second, and driving the first item, is the increasing variation in the size of events now seeking other locations. As more people seek outside venues for smaller events, the number of such activities has grown. As such, it is no longer a safe assumption that irregular gatherings or "assemblies" will be rare and occasional, or that the impacts of allowing event gatherings will remain inconsequential to the surrounding neighborhood. To address this issue, staff has proposed the attached draft for discussion at the Planning Commission. In essence, the event center activity is being distinguished from the previous category of use labeled "public assembly". The distinguishing characteristics tend to be the "predictability" of the gathering. Public assembly is viewed as a use that generates relatively predictable gatherings at regular times. For these uses, zoning regulations can rely on that predictability to address impacts on surrounding land uses. The event center use is distinguished by a wide variety of sized of assemblies that may or may not follow regular schedules — they would often be commercial in nature, and may or may not include alcohol licensing as an aspect of the use. Perhaps the most important aspect of the proposed ordinance is to ensure that assemblies within residential zones continue to include only the expected impacts on residential neighborhoods. To address this issue, the event center use is steered to commercial districts, including the CCD. The ordinance includes language that, through the CUP process, event centers that may have proximity to sensitive areas — such as residential areas — may expect to see restrictions on hours of operation or similar considerations. The ordinance is provided, still in a preliminary format, to permit Planning Commission comment and input at this early stage. Staff would expect to fine tune the details of the ordinance with using that input, and present a more formal ordinance for consideration at a subsequent meeting. 2 C���'i`E� 3: i15� Si��fi��t��5 Section 5. I Use Table �ubsection (A) F�cplanation of Use Table Structure CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS 5.1 Use Table (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure (1) Organization of Table 5-1 Table 5-1 organizes all principal uses by Use Classifications and Use Types. (a) Use Classi�cations The Use Classifications are: Agricultural Uses; Residential Uses; Civic and Institutional Uses; Office Use; Commercial Uses; and Industrial Uses. The Use Classifications provide a systematic basis for assigning present and future land uses into broad general classifications (e.g., residential and commercial uses). The Use Classifications then organize land uses and activities into specific "Use Types" based on common functional, product, or physical characteristics, such as the type and amount of activity, the type of customers or residents, how goods or services are sold or delivered and site conditions. (b) Use Types The specific Use Types identify the specific uses that are considered to fall within characteristics identified in the use Classifications. For example; detached dwellings, parks and recreational areas, and schools are "Use Types" in the Single Family Residence District. (2) Symbols used in Table 5-1 (a) Permitted Uses = P A"P" indicates that a use is permitted by right, subject to compliance with all other applicable provisions of this ordinance. Uses may be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "Additional Requirements" column. (b) Conditionally Permitted Uses = C A"C" indicates that a use is permitted provided the City can establish conditions necessary to ensure the use is compatible to the proposed location and surrounding properties. Inability of the City to establish conditions to adequately control anticipated impacts is justification for denial of a conditionally permitted use. Conditional Uses may also be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "Additional Requirements" column. City a� i��nt�eeiio Coning'ir�inc�ne� I���€; .s�s �'HAPTER S: USE STAfilDARDS Section 5. I Use Table Subsection (A) F�cplanation of Use Table Structure (c) Interim Permitted Uses = I An "P' indicates that a use may be permitted for a brief period of time provided certain conditions are met, and a specific event or date can be established for discontinuance of the use. Inability of the City to establish conditions to adequately control anticipated impacts is justification for denial of an interim permitted use. Interim Permitted Uses may also be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "Additional Requirements" column. (d) Prohibited Uses = Shaded Cells A shaded cell indicates that the listed use is prohibited in the respective base zoning district. (e) Unlisted Uses If an application is submitted for a use that is not listed in Table 5-1, the Community Development Department is authorized to classify the new or unlisted use into an existing Use Type that most closely fits the new or unlisted use. If no similar use determination can be made, the use will be considered prohibited in which case an amendment to the ordinance text would need to be initiated to clarify if, where, and how a proposed use could be established. �h`��� �:��`� ;���� c�� f�Ion�ieeiso �or�ir�g �rcr'ir�ante er-IA�rE� s: usE sr��aAa�s Section 5. I Use Table �ubsection (A) F�cplanation of Use Table Structure � � . .- . � -. �.. . . . . -. -. • . -. Residential Uses 5.2(Cl( I 1 Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(Cl(21(al - Duplex p C 5.2(Cl(21(bl - Townhouse C p 5.2(Cl(21(cl - Multiple-Family C P C C 5.2(Cl(21(dl Detached Dwelling p p p p p p None Group Residential P P P P P 5 2(C1(31 Facility, Single Family Group Residential C C C 5.2(C1(31 Facility, Multi-Family Mobile & Manufactured C C C P C 5.2(C1(41 Home / Home Park Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p None (public) Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5 2(D1(11 (private) Assisted Living Facilities C P C C P 5•2(Dl(21 Cemeteries C C C C C C C 5•2(Dl(31 Clinics/Medical Services C p p C None Essential Services p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p None Hospitals C p p C 5.2(D1(41 Nursing/Convalescent C C C C C C C C C P P 5.2(Dl(5l Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2(D)(6) Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5•2(Dl(7l Schools, K-12 C C C C C C � � 5.2(Dl(81 Schools, Higher Education None C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2(D1(91 O�ce Uses Offices P P P P P P P 5.2(El City of Monticello Zoning Ordinanc� Page 325 CHAPTER S: USE STAhlDARDS Section 5. I Use Table Subsection (A) F�cplanation of Use Table Structure � � . .- . � -. �.. . . . . -. -. • . -. Commercial Uses Adult Uses P P 3.7(Kl Auction House C 5.2(Fl(21 Auto Repair — Minor C C P P 5.2(F1(31 Automotive Wash Facilities P C 5.2(F1(41 Bed & Breakfasts C C C C C 5.2(F1(51 Brew Pub P P 5.2(F1(61 Business Support Services P P P P P None Commercial Lodging C P P 5.2(F1(71 Communications/Broadcasting P P P P 5.2(Fl(81 Convenience Retail C P P P 5.2(Fl(91 Country Club C 5.2(F�( I 0� Day Care Centers C C P P C 5.2(F�( I I� EntertainmentlRecreation, p p C C C 5.2(F�(12� Indoor Commercial EntertainmentlRecreation, C C C C 5.2(�(13� Outdoor Commercial Financiallnstitution P C P 5.2(�(14� Funeral Services P P 5.2(�(15� Kennels (commercial) C 5.2(�(16� Landscaping / Nursery P 5 2(�(17� Business Personal Services C P P P 5.2(�(2 �� Production Brewery or Micro-Distillery without P P 5.2(�( I 0�. Taproom Production Brewery or 5 2(�(23� Micro-Distillery with C C C C C 5 2(G�( I I� Taproom or Cocktail Room Recreational Vehicle Camp C 5.2(�(24� Site Repair Establishment C P P P P 5.2(�(25� Restaurants C P P C 5.2(�(26� Retail Commercial Uses (other) Buildings Less than P P P 5.2(�(27� 10,000 SF Retail Commercial Uses (other) Buildings Over 10,000 C P P 5.2(�(27� SF Pag� ��� City af �onticelfo Zonrng �rdinanee er-IA�rE� s: usE sr��aAa�s Section 5. I Use Table �ubsection (A) F�cplanation of Use Table Structure � � . .- . � -. �.. . . . . -. -. • . -. Specialty Eating C P P P 5.2(�(28�. Establishments Vehicle Fuel Sales C C C 5.2(�(29�. Vehicle Sales and Rental C 5.2(�(30�. Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(�(31 �. (Rural) Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.2(F�(31 � (Neighborhood) Wholesale Sales P P P None Industrial Uses Auto Repair — Major C P P 5.2(G1( I 1 Bulk Fuel Sales and p p 5 2(Gl(21 Storage Contractor's Yard, � � � 5 2(G1(31 Temporary Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(Gl(4l General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(Gl(51 Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(Gl(61 Industrial Services C P None Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G1(71 Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(Gl(81 Machinery/Truck Repair & Sales P P 5'2(Gl(91 Recycling and Salvage Center C C 5.2(G�( I 0� Self-Storage Facilities C P 5.2(G�( I I� Truck or Freight C C 5.2(G�( I 2� Terminal Waste Disposal & Incineration C 5.2(�(13� Wrecker Services C P 5.2(�(14� City of Monticello Zoning Ordinanc� Page 327 Ci 7�iPTE� S: USE ST��iD�iR�5 Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (D) Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses (b) New cemeteries shall be located on a site or parcel that fronts an arterial or collector street. (c) Cemeteries shall include adequate space for the parking and maneuvering of funeral processions. (d) Interments shall take place at least 50 feet from any lot line. (e) Cemeteries shall not be located within one-half mile of Interstate Highway 94. (4) Hospitals A hospital shall: (a) Be located on a site of at least five acres. (b) Be located on a parcel that fronts or has direct access to an arterial or collector street. (c) Be served by public water and wastewater systems. (5) Nursing or Convalescent Home (a) Side yards shall be double the minimum requirements established for the applicable district. (b) When abutting a residential use in a residential use district, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "B") in accordance with section 41(G) ofthis ordinance. (c) One (1) off-street loading space in compliance with Section 4.8 of this ordinance is installed. (6) Places of Public Assembly (a) Institutions on parcels exceeding 20,000 square feet in area shall be located with direct frontage on, and access to, a collector or arterial street. (b) The buildings are set back from adjoining residential districts a distance no less than double the adjoining residential setback. (c) When abutting a residential use in a residential use district, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "B") in accordance with section 41(G) ofthis ordinance. City a� i'i�-nt�ee�io �onsng'rvir��ne� ����; .s.�� �f-t�P��� �: 115� S°1`.�P�fCi��i�S Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (D) Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses (d) Adequate off-street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting or directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with Section 4.8 of this ordinance and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section 41(F) of this ordinance. (e) Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are considered and satisfactorily provided. (f) Public Assembly in the B-3 District: (i) Shall only be allowed on properties of 10 acres in size or more. (ii) Public Assembly uses in the B-3 District must occupy buildings of at least 20,000 gross square feet of area. (iii) Public Assembly uses in the B-3 District shall provide off-street parking areas that are designed to meet their unique traffic patterns and parking accumulation ratios. For the B-3 district, the requirement shall be one parking space per 2.5 seats in the main assembly area, based on the building code calculation for maximum occupancy. (iv) Proposed Public Assembly applications in the B-3 District will be required to provide a traffic study demonstrating peak traffic periods, and the ability to manage traffic loads without negatively impacting the adjoining public streets. Private and/or public street improvements may be required to ensure no negative impacts. (v) CUP applications for Public Assembly uses in the B-3 District will require the identification of the principal use, and those other uses of the subject property that are proposed as accessory uses. All such uses must be allowed in the B-3 District. (7) Public Buildings or Uses: (a) When abutting a residential use in a residential use district, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "B") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. (b) Conformity with the surrounding neighborhood is maintained and required setbacks and side yard requirements are met. (8) Pre-K-12 Schools (public or private): (a) Educational institutions on parcels exceeding 20,000 square feet in area shall be located with direct frontage on, and access to, a collector or arterial street. Section 4.1(F): Standards,� Vehicular Use Area LandscapinQ �h`��� ���� ;���� c�� f�Ion�ieeiso �or�ir�g �rcr'ir�ante C�-i�il�i`E� S: i�5� Si��f��t�L35 Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Su�section (F) Regulations for Commercial Uses (vi) Shall be a minimum size of 2,000 sq. ft., or in the alternative 75 sq. ft. per child at licensed capacity, whichever is the greater figure. (c) All state laws and statutes governing such use are strictly adhered to and all required operating permits are secured. (d) In addition to items (a) through (c) above, day care centers in the I-1 district, shall adhere to the following additional requirements: (i) Only be allowed as a secondary combination use which complements a primary business; (ii) Only be conducted in the principal building, and not exceed 20% of the total principal building square footage; (iii) Be physically separated from the other activities occurring in the principal building; (iv) Not have a dedicated entrance (other than emergency e�ts) from the exterior of the principal building; (v) Not have dedicated off-street parking or signage. (12) Entertainment/Recreation — Indoor Commercial (a) No auctions shall take place on the premises. (b) Outdoor storage shall be prohibited. (c) Noise shall be controlled consistent with the standards of this ordinance. (d) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "B") in accordance with section 41(G) of this ordinance (13) Entertainment/Recreation — Outdoor Commercial Se�tion 41 �G): (a) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with at least a St�ndards,� semi-opaque buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "C") in accordance with section Perimeter Buffers 41(G) ofthis ordinance. (b) Adequate measures to contain the proposed activity on the subject site shall be provided (c) Dust and noise are controlled consistent with City Ordinance. City a� i��nt�eeiio Coning'ir�in�ne� Ir���; .s�� �f-t�P��� �: 115� S°1`.�P�fCi��i�S Section 52 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (F) Regulations for Commercial Us,� ; (ii) Dry cleaning operations shall be self-contained in terms of noise and fumes with no venting to outside of building. (iii) Dry cleaning facilities shall have direct access to majorthoroughfare via driveway or frontage road. (c) Tattoo parlors shall be restricted to the B-4 district. (22) Places of Public Assembly In the CCD, F-1 sub-district, the following conditions shall apply: (a) Building architecture shall be designed to reflect retail street-level architecture as defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and detailed in the document "Embracing Downtown Monticello." (b) Site planning shall minimize parking lot development adjacent to public areas in the district, including streets, pathways, and open spaces. (23) Production Breweries and Micro-Distilleries with Accessory Taproom or Cocktail Room Production Breweries and Micro-Distilleries with Accessory Taproom or Cocktail Room shall be allowed by conditional use permit in the CCD, B-3 and B-4 Districts, provided that: (a) The owner ofthe brewery qualifies for and receives a brewer license and a malt liquor wholesale license from the State of Minnesota, according to Minn. Statutes Section 340A301. (b) The Brewery or Micro-Distillery includes an accessory brewer's taproom or cocktail room for the on-sale of products produced on-site, and such room shall require the applicable license from the City of Monticello, according to City Code Section 3-1-13. (c) On-site sale of beer in the form of growlers shall require a Brewery License for Off-Sale of Malt Liquor, according to City Code Section 3-1-13. Off-sale hours of sale must conform to hours of sale for retail off-sale licensees in the City of Monticello. (d) Tota1 production of malt liquor may not exceed 10,000 barrels annually. Of the 10,000 barrel production limit, onsite taproom retail sales shall not exceed 3,500 barrels annually, 500 barrels of which may be sold off-sale as growlers. The brewer shall annually submit production reports with the request to renew a brewer taproom or off-sale malt liquor license. wJ`��� 1�.�: ;� �.� �� r�ront�eeiso Cor�ing tJrc�rr�arree �`������� �f ���� �� � ���i�f�l�r`�� `}� ��F ;x� 8.4 De finitions ����section (B) Lots DWELLING: A building or portion thereof designated exclusively for residential occupancy, including one-family, two-family, and multiple family dwellings, but not including hotels, motels, and boarding houses. DWELLING, ATTACHED: A structure intended for occupancy by more than one family, including duplexes, townhomes, multi-family dwellings, apartments, and condominiums. Accessory dwelling units as defined and permitted by this ordinance are incidental to a principal dwelling unit and are not considered to be attached dwellings. DWELLING, DUPLEX OR TWO-FAMILY: Any building that contains two separate dwelling units with separation either horizontal or vertical on one lot that is used, intended, or designed to be built, used, rented, leased, let or hired out to be occupied, or occupied for living purposes. DWELLING, SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED: Any building that contains one dwelling unit used, intended, or designed to be guilt, used, rented, leased, let or hired out to be occupied, or occupied for living purposes by one (1) family. DWELLING, MULTIPLE FAMILY: A building designed with three (3) or more dwelling units exclusively for occupancy by three (3) or more families living independently of each other but sharing hallways and main entrances and exits. DWELLING iTNIT: An area within a structure designed and constructed to be occupied by one family which includes permanent provisions for living, cooking, and sanitation. Dwelling unit does not include hotels, motels, group residential facilities, correctional facilities, nursing/convalescent home, rehabilitation centers, or other structures designed for transient residence. EFFICIENCY APARTMENT: A dwelling unit consisting of one (1) principal room exclusive of bathroom, hallway, closets, or dining alcove, and has limited provisions for cooking (kitchenette). ENTERTAINMENT, INDOOR COMMERCIAL: An establishment providing completely enclosed recreation or entertainment activities. Accessory uses may include the preparation and serving of food or the sale of equipment related to the enclosed uses. Included in this definition shall be bowling, roller skating or ice-skating, billiards, pool, motion picture theaters, and related amusements. This use does not include adult uses. ENTERTAINMENT, OUTDOOR COMMERCIAL: An establishment providing recreation or entertainment activities primarily occurring outdoors. Accessory uses may include the preparation and serving of food, the sale of equipment related to the outdoor uses, and complementary indoor entertainment facilities. Examples of outdoor commercial City a� i��nt�eeiio Coning'ir�inc�ne� I���€; ��s �t-i��;�� �a :����� � ����������� Section 8.4 De f�=�=°�a.r. � m� Subsection (B) L��:ry; entertainment businesses include, but are not limited to, a golf driving range, sand volleyball courts, go-carts, or a miniature golf course. This use does not include projectile weapon ranges (archery or shooting), a stadium or a drive-in movie theater. ERECT: Activity of constructing, building, raising, assembling, placing, affi�ng, attaching, creating, painting, drawing or any other way of bringing into being or establishing. EROSION: The wearing away of the ground surface as a result of the movement of wind, water, ice and/or land disturbance activities. EROSION CONTROL: A measure that prevents erosion including but not limited to: soil stabilization practices, limited grading, mulch, temporary or permanent cover, and construction phasing. EROSION PREVENTION: Measures employed to prevent erosion. Examples include, but are not limited to: soil stabilization practices, limited grading, mulch, temporary or permanent cover, and construction phasing. EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR: A designated agent given authority by the City of Monticello to inspect and maintain erosion and sediment control practices. ESSENTIAL SERVICES: Public or private utility systems for gas, electricity, steam, sewer and water; voice, television, and digital communications systems; and waste disposal and recycling services. These services include underground, surface, and overhead systems and all accessories thereto such as poles, towers, wires, mains, drains, vaults, culverts, laterals, sewers, pipes, catch basins, water storage tanks, conduits, cables, fire alarm boxes, police call boxes, traffic signals, pumps, lift stations, hydrants, and other similar features necessary for the function ofthe essential service. Wireless radio frequency reception and transmission antennas and support structures shall not be considered an essential service. Essential Services do not include buildings or uses that include human occupancy or activity beyond occasional service or maintenance. EXTRACTION OF MATERIALS: the development or e�traction of a natural resource in excess of four hundred (400) cubic yards from its natural occurrences on affected land without processing. EXTRACTIVE USE: The use of land for surface or subsurface removal of sand, gravel, rock, industrial minerals, other nonmetallic minerals, and peat not regulated under Minnesota Statutes, sections 93.44 to 93.51. EVERGREEN TREE: A tree that retains some or most of its leaves or needles throughout the year. ����� ��� City �j iYiont�ee�so �onrr�g �rainan�e �`,�����"�� �� ��.�� �� � ���I�ii�i�%i5 `}� ��F ;x� 8.4 De finitions ����section (B) Lots PERMITTEE: Applicant for and recipient of an approved permit. PERSON: An individual, firm, partnership, association, corporation, or organization of any kind. PERSONAL SERVICES: Establishments that primarily engage in providing services generally involving the care of the person or person's possessions. Personal services may include but are not limited to: laundry and dry-cleaning services, barber shops, beauty salons, health and fitness studios, music schools, informational and instructional services, tanning salons, and portrait studios. PHASING (in relation to grading): Clearing a parcel of land in distinct phases, with the stabilization of each phase completed before the clearing of the next. PLACE OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY: An institution or facility that congregations of people regularly attend to participate in or hold meetings, workshops, lectures, civic activities, religious services, and other similar activities, including buildings in which such functions and activities are held. PLAN REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES: Manual detailing City specifications for all plan requirements. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: A type of development which may incorporate a variety of land uses planned and developed as a unit. The planned unit development is distinguished from the traditional subdivision process of development in that zoning standards such as density, setbacks, height limits, and minimum lot sizes may be altered by negotiation and agreement between the developer, the municipality, and the Commissioner of Natural Resources as may be required. PLANTING STRIP: Areas intended for the placement of vegetation within the interior of vehicular use areas or along street right-of-way edges, typically between the back of the curb and the inside edge of the sidewalk. PORTABLE CONTAINER: A large container designed and rented or leased for the temporary storage of commercial, industrial, or residential household goods that does not contain a foundation or wheels for movement. PRINCIPAL USE: The main use of land or buildings as distinguished from subordinate or accessory uses. City a� i��nt�eelio Coning'ir�inc�ne� I���€; �.� i°' Planning Commission Agenda - 03/OS/19 3A. Consideration to appoint one representative to the 2040 Monticello Communitv Vision & Comprehensive Plan Proposal Review Sub-Committee (AS) On February l lth, 2019, the City Council authorized the release of the 2040 Monticello Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan RFP. A sub-committee will be established to assist in recommending a final consulting firm for the proj ect. The Planning Commission is therefore asked to appoint a representative to the Monticello Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan Proposal Review Sub-Committee. The sub-committee will meet approximately 2-3 times during the month of April to review the submitted proposals and recommend a final group of proposing consultants to be interviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. Planning Commission representation is critical, as the Comprehensive Plan is the city's guide for growth and development for the next 20 years. The Comprehensive Plan reflects the community's vision and articulates the goals for how Monticello will take shape during this period. Other bodies proposed for representation on the sub-committee include the City Council, EDA, IEDC and Parks & Recreation Commission. The appointment of a representative is in advance of the City Council's formal establishment of the sub-committee, which will be requested on March l lth, 2019. However, as the Planning Commission will not meet again until Apri12"d, representation is being requested to expedite the sub-committee's work at the beginning of April. Meeting dates and an information packet will be provided to the representative once the Council establishes the group. A separate Technical Advisory Committee will be appointed to steer the full Visioning & Comprehensive Plan process once a consultant is selected. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to nominate Commissioner as the Planning Commission representative to 2040 Monticello Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan Proposal Review Sub-Committee, pending Council approval of a sub-committee. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff defers to the Planning Commission on matters of appointment. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. City of Monticello Building Safety & Code Enforcement Department / Welcome to the City of Monticello Department of Building SafetY& Code Enforcement. The Building Safety & Code Enforcement Department serves residents and businesses by supporting new construction projects, renovation of existing properties, and building / expansion within the City of Monticello. Our staff is dedicated to providing user-friendly, professional customer service in order to make it easier for individuals and companies to achieve their building objectives and comply with building codes, zoning requirements, and City Ordinances. The City adopts codes and zoning policies to protect the health, safety and quality of life of Monticello residents. Enforcement of these regulations results in a number of benefits: a more beautiful community, stable neighborhoods, and a safe, secure and balanced environment. Anyone planning to build or improve his or her property should contact the department. January 2018 thru April 2018 Team of 4 John Rued - Chief Building Official Deb Cole - Bldg Dept Cord / Inspector Ron Hackenmueller - Inspector Rod Spearing - Inspector May 2018 thru December 2018 Team of 3 Plus on Hackenmueller- Chief Bldg. Official Deb Cole - Bldg. Dept. Coordinator/Insp ,orey MurpKy - Inspector As Needed: Rud River Construction Consultants Andy Schreder -Inspector Bob Ferguson - Inspector What is wrong with this picture??? Something / Someone doesn't measure up •r M III/I' "WM1II///I M 1 l • rIF\ •is www o/fw • • l fwwww\H1\w ` Mrr ru\nr nnr\fIe\w\r+a�a � •1■r[el• :1TiTiTi►'1iTi •IziNm1l[afifiz• Rental Ordinance & Licensing Continued efforts to seek more efficient ways to improve the current program. / 1. Rental Ordinance has been in place since 2007 2. Changes were made in 2014 to the application process to make it more user friendly, and at the same time getting the information we need to stay effective. Purpose of Rental Licensing Program: To maintain our current housing stock in a safe, healthy and code compliant status. 1. Benefits property owners, renters, and the community Rental Licensing Process w 1. Two application reminders are sent out to the property owners the end of October and the beginning of December (Applications are due every year and inspections every other year - even addresses are inspected on even years and odd addresses are inspected on odd years). w 2. Applications are due by December 31St to avoid the late penalty. w 3. February 1St, late application letters are sent out. w 4. February 15th, Inspection reminders are sent out. w 5. February 19th, non applicants go to the City Attorney for a final notice to apply prior to prosecution letter. (36 last year, only 18 this year) w 6. March 30th, licenses are mailed out to properties that have passed inspection or those properties not needing an inspection. w 7. All rental properties requiring inspections are to be completed by March 14th. 8. May 15th, all unlicensed rental properties get turned over to the City Attorney for prosecution. 600 500 434 446 399 400 358 346 287 312 300 200 100 0 2007(08) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .•. Rental Applications Received 486 468 Pr 438 LU18 2018 we had 100% compliance for applications. First year since we started the rental program PIA $60,000.00 $50,000.00 $40,000.00 $30,000.00 $32,115 $20,000.00 $10,000.00 Rental Fees Collected $39,525 $0.00 2007(08) 2009 $43,671 $40,665 $45,235 $38,500 $38,850 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 $49,600 $45,210 $49,020 $45,500 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jan 29 400 350 300 250 237 201 200 150 100 50 0 2007 (08) 2009 248 2010 Single Family Home Rentals PX-VA 2011 313 276 343 358 2012 2013 2014 2015 349 2016 328 2017 319 2018 Number of Rental Inspection Per Year 600 547 500 400 300 293 200 100 0 2007 (08) 2009 273 261 !!���307 335 353 291 257 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Drdinnncf; x�^� ti•� � _ is 711 ,1 � •"`x - � � .. �l lilt i i s Number of Blights Based on the following � numbers you see, there has /been fewer notices given out since we went to a complaint only bases. 700 623 600 500 S 400 300 200 El I 17 118 116 90 122 _� _ 62 73%%.,] 4 8 8 8 10 201 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 201" Number of Blights Mowed by Contractor In 2010 and 2011 the numbers were high due to the fact that we conducted a "sweep" every Spring. Citizen Service Desk Correspondence Building & Rental Ordinance Questions 29 Building / Sign Permit questions 46 BlightMMM 56 A!WJ46 0 20 ,M ■2018 ■2017 51 60 80 100 Building Statistics oil ■ HARDH AREA $70,000,000.00 $60,000,000.00 $50,000,000.00 $40,0094000.00 IIKI�KIII�II� $20,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $9,033,078.00 $0.00 2010 Total Building Valuation $15,821,223.00 $12,285,873.00 $12,802,549.00 $19,704,895.00 $36,214,743.00 $59,426,683.00 $43,853,123.00 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $33,125,788.50 2018 $800,000.00 $700,000.00 $600,000.00 $500,000.00 a� z0 0 $200,000.00 $100,000.00 Building Revenue & Plan Review Fees $690,135.00 $78,328.00 �06,/Z)O.uu 1 $35,048.00 $42,364.00 $51,983.00 $0.00 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Axis Title --o—Revenue --o—Plan Review 2016 2017 Mell7 971.00 • 2018 2019 Annual Permit Counts /Permits Issued / 10 00 N O O N 01 00 N LO I� M 0 `D O 10 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 I 2017 1. KIM; 12000 8000 Me 4000 2000 l� 0 ' 2006 2008 Number of Building Inspections Completed 1108 1117 2010 2012 2014 2016 IM 2018 2020 Some of our "Larger" Projects at various stages being constructed in 2019 • 47 Unit Apartment Building (the hole is dug - located behind Beef O'Brady's) • New Fire Station Monticello RV Projects that may happen in 2019 • Senior Housing Development • Plus 2 other projects Our prediction is that we may conceivably reach over $40.,000,000 in valuation in 2019. The Department of Building Safety's goalis to provide comprehensive, � consistent,, and clear information on the Rental,, Zoning, and Building along with City Ordinances that need to be followed. Feel free to stopien or call us at (763) 295-3060 if you have any questions or concerns. r isle r -i Planning Commission Agenda - 03/OS/19 3C. Communitv Development Director's Report Council Action on Commission Recommendations • Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a Variance to Chapter 4.5 Signs for a forty (40) foot pylon sign. Applicant: Twin City Staffing City Council heard the appeal by property owner Twin City Staffing on February 25th, 2019. The Council approved the appeal of the denial of the variance, allowing up to a S' variance in height to accommodate the sign. The Council's finding for the approval was based on the shape of the subject site, the large drainage and utility easement on the north side of the property, and other factors unique to the site. Safe Routes to School Planning Study Update The SRTS planning project consultant, ALTA, has provided the School District with an initial list of recommendations and observations related to pedestrian and bicyclist safety for school facilities. The School District has asked for City staff input, which has been provided. A conference call to further review and refine the initial findings will occur the week of February 25th. It is anticipated that the final report will be presented to the City and School District before May of this year.