Loading...
City Council Minutes 03-23-1987MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, March 23, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen. Members Absent: None. 2. Approval of Minutes. Motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Bill Fair, and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, and the special meeting held March 17, 1987. 3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests and Complaints. The Coordinator for Community Education for the Handicapped in Wright County appeared before the Council to request City support of a proclamation setting April 26 through May 2, 1987, as Handicap Awareness Week. The proclamation was signed by the Mayor. 4. Public Hearing to Consider the Making of a Public Improvement in Construction Five Subdivision and Along County Road 118. A public hearing was held to receive any comments from the public regarding the proposed sewer, water, and street improvements planned for the Construction Five Subdivision and a water line extension along County Road 118 to serve the new middle school site. Hearing no comments from the public, the public hearing was closed. 5. Consideration of Accepting Bids for the Construction of Public Improvements in Construction Five Subdivision and Along County Road 118. On March 17, nine bids were received for the construction of sewer, water, storm sewer, and street improvements within the Construction Five Subdivision. The bids ranged in price from a low of $255,234.60 to $327,433.25. The alternate bid for the extension of a water main along County Road 118 added $25,202 to the low bid for a total low bid of $280,436.60. City Engineer, John Badalich, recommended that the low bid from S & L Excavating of St. Cloud be accepted as the responsible bidder. Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, and unanimously carried to accept the low bid as recommended by the City Engineer from S & L Excavating in the amount of $280,436.60. It is anticipated that the contract would be awarded at the April 27, 1987, Council meeting. no Council Minutes - 3/23/87 6. Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Setting the Sale of Tax Increment Finance Bonds for Improvements in Construction Five Addition. Mr. Jerry Shannon of Springsted, Inc., the City's Bond Consultant, reviewed with the Council the proposed $365,000 tax increment bond issue necessary to finance the Construction Five Subdivision improvements. The bond issue would run 12 years, and the projected tax increments from the Construction Five Subdivision are anticipated to be sufficient to retire the bond without additional tax levies. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Bill Fair, and unanimously carried to adopt a resolution calling for the sale of $365,000 in tax increment bonds with bids receivable April 27, 1987. See Resolution 87-8. 7. Consideration of Granting a Conditional Use for the Operation of a Convenience Store and the Dispensing of Motor Fuels Incidental to that Convenience Store. Applicant, Thomas Holthaus. On January 13, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council grant approval to the issuance of a conditional use permit for the purpose of dispensing automotive fuel incidental to a principal use, namely, a convenience store at the former Charlie's West Supper Club on County Road 75. Additional conditions that were attached by the Planning Commission included 1) a detailed landscaping/screening plan would be required prior to a building permit being issued; 2) a full hard surfaced parking lot with proper curb and gutter and sidewalks would be required; 3) prior to granting a certificate of occupancy, money would be required in escrow to guarantee the full completion of any landscaping, screening, and parking not yet completed; 4) the hours of operation would not exceed 5 a.m. to 11 p.m. daily; 5) only four fuel dispensing pumps would be allowed; 6) the dispensing of motor fuels would not be allowed for automobiles and trucks over one ton. The City Council on January 26, 1987, was presented with a petition calling for an environmental assessment worksheet from the neighboring residents on this project. The City Council at that meeting officially denied the petition stating that an EAW would not be required. In order to allow for the filing in District Court of any appeals on the Council's decision not to require an EAW, the public hearing was continued until March 23, 1987. Administrator Eidem noted to the Council that the Court Administrator in Buffalo indicated that no appeal had been filed and thus the City Council was able to consider the conditional use request. In reviewing the proposed development plan for the convenience store and gas station, the Wright County Highway Engineer, Wayne Fingalson, noted that problems existed with the driveway entrances off of County Road 75 into the development as proposed. The County Highway Department's main concern was that the proposed westerly driveway would be located only 75 feet from the entrance of the existing Otter Creek Road and would cause traffic problems. In addition, the County Engineer indicated -2- Council Minutes - 3/23/87 that a right turn lane on County Road 75 would be required into this development, as it would generate more than 40 vehicles per day. Administrator Eidem noted that Otter Creek Road currently connects to County Road 75 at an angle, and the road could be realigned to a 90 degree angle which would provide 90 feet between Otter Creek Road and the entrance into the convenience store. This footage would be acceptable by the County, but the proposed realignment of Otter Creek Road would cost approximately $7,000, which the County would not help pay for. Although the developer, Tom Holthaus, did not feel the realignment of Otter Creek Road should be their responsibility, they did indicate a willingness to share in the realignment cost of $7,000 in an effort to avoid redeveloping their site plan. It was estimated by the City Engineer that the establishment of a right turn lane would cost approximately $2,000, which should be entirely borne by the developers, as it is an access to their property. As a result of the above discussion, motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Fran Fair, and unanimously carried to approve the issuance of a conditional use permit for the dispensing of motor fuels provided the six conditions recommended by the Planning Commission were adhered to and that the developers pay 50 percent of the realignment of Otter Creek Road cost and all of the right turn lane cost into the development. The total estimated cost to the developer would be $5,500, and their share would be paid to the City with terms to be negotiated with City staff. 8. Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of the Cable Franchise from Rite Cable of Minnesota to Jones Intercable. Rite Cable of Minnesota is proposing to transfer ownership of the cable system to Jones Intercable. The Cable Commission has held public hearings on the proposed transfer, and negotiations have taken place regarding the franchise to be transferred, including some language changes requested by Jones Intercable. The Cable Commission's attorney, Tom Creighton, recommended that each City approve the resolution authorizing the transfer of the cable franchise contingent upon further review by the attorneys as to the language changes requested. As a result, a motion wasmade by Bill Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, and unanimously carried to adopt a resolution authorizing the assignment and transfer of the cable franchise from Rite Cable of Minnesota to Jones Intercable. See Resolution 87-9. 9. Consideration of a Request for a One Day Set-up/3.2 Beer License for Ducks Unlimited and a One Day 3.2 Off -Sale Beer License for July 5th Celebration - Applicant, Monticello Lions Club. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, and unanimously carried to approve the issuance of the one day temporary 3.2 Beer and Set-up License for May 11 and a one day 3.2 Beer License for the July 5 celebration for the Lions Club Organization. -3- Council Minutes - 3/23/87 10. Consideration of Allowing the Granting of Gambling Licenses. The Wright County Chapter of Ducks Unlimited ha to the State Charitable Gambling Board for a on a raffle at their annual banquet May 11, 1987. Jaycees have applied for a gambling license to sales at the Comfort Inn and at the Silver Fox governmental unit does not indicate in writing any opposition to the issuance of the licenses, will issue the license after 30 days. s made application e day license to conduct Also, the Monticello establish a pull tab Inn. If the local to the Gambling Board the Gambling Board Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Fran Fair, and unanimously carried to take no action opposing the license requests. 11. Consideration of Approving a Land Surveyors Certificate of Correction for the River Terrace Plat. Mr. Greg Smith of Smith, Pringle, & Hayes, submitted a Certificate of Correction to the River Terrace Plat which would allow the plat to be corrected in regards to a description error that occurred during the original surveying. Based on the recommendation of the City Attorney, motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, and unanimously carried to approve the filing of the Certificate of Correction for the River Terrace Plat as presented. 12. Department Head Reports. Quarterly department head reports were discussed and reviewed with the Council including representatives of the Wright County Sheriff's Department and Monticello Fire Department. Liquor Store Manager, Joe Hartman, was present and reviewed the year- end financial report for the Liquor Store operation with the Council. Mr. Hartman noted that this was the first year the Liquor Store had sales in excess of $1 million with the total net income exceeding $123,000. Economic Development Director, 011ie Koropchak, noted that a letter of inquiry was sent to the Minnesota Commissioner of the Midwest Compact Commission in January which indicated Monticello's potential interest in hosting a regional low level radioactive waste disposal facility and requested additional information aimed at assisting the City in deciding whether to pursue development of such a facility in this area. The location of a waste disposal facility would generate an estimated $2 million a year in direct and indirect revenue and would require approximately a 200 acre parcel of land for the facility. After further discussion, it was the general consensus of the Council to proceed with obtaining more information on Monticello as a possible site. -4- Council Minutes - 3/23/87 Department head reports were also discussed with Roger Mack, Street Superintendent, and Gary Anderson, Building Inspector. 13. Consideration of Highway 25 Bridge Lighting. As part of the Highway 25 Bridge Project, MN/DOT had requested that the City of Monticello pay for the electrical usage for the lights on the bridge similar to the City's agreement on the lights in Monticello for Highway 25. MN/DOT would pay for the installation of the six lights at an estimated cost of $16,000, and MN/DOT would maintain the lights in the future but requested again that the City consider paying for the electricity to operate them. MN/DOT representatives indicated that if the City is unwilling to pay for the electricity, the lights would be removed from the bridge project. MN/DOT indicated that there are two bridges, one at Clearwater and another at Elk River, that the State does pay for the electricity, but the majority of the bridges within District 3 that are located within a municipality are paid for by the municipality. Previously the City Council indicated an unwillingness to pay for the electricity cost, as they felt it should be the responsibility of the highway department. Administrator Eidem noted that only half of the lights would actually be in the City limits, but at the present time Sherburne County has indicated they would not be willing to pay for their half; and he recommended that the City contact Big Lake Township representatives to see if an agreement could be reached to whereby they would reimburse the City for the electricity cost of three of the lights. The Council discussed whether MN/DOT would actually eliminate the lighting from the bridge if the City did not agree to pay for the electricity; and although it could not be determined whether they actually would be eliminated, a motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, authorizing the Administrator to notify MN/DOT that the City would agree to pay the electricity cost for the bridge lighting in the future. Voting in favor: Bill Fair, Warren Smith, Fran Fair. Opposed: Arve Grimsmo, Dan Blonigen, as they felt it should be the responsibility of MN/DOT for safety reasons. 14. Consideration of Bills for the Month of March. Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Dan Blonigen, and unanimously carried to approve the bills for the month of March as presented. Rick Wolfst ler Assistant Administrator -5-