IEDC Agenda 05-07-2019AGENDA
INDUSTRIAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (IEDC)
Tuesday, May 7th, 2019 — 7:00 a.m.
North Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Members: Darek Vetsch, Kevin Steffensmeier, Steve Johnson, Joni Pawelk, Wayne Elam, Luke
Dahlheimer, Dick Van Allen, Don Roberts, Andrew Tapper, Mike Carr, Christopher
Church, Elizabeth Calpas, Randy Skarphol, Kari Moorhouse
Liaisons: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Jeff O'Neill, Angela Schumann, Jim Thares, Jacob Thunander,
Marcy Anderson, Duane Northagen, Dave Tombers, Mark Hanson
1. Call to Order
2. Approve Minutes:
a. April 2nd, 2019 meeting minutes
3. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda
4. Consideration of providing recommendation regarding proposed Zoning Ordinance
amendment allowing Industrial Self Storage in the I-1 and I-2 Districts.
5. Consideration of Update of BR&E Visits/Schedule — Verbal updates to be provided
6. Reports (Verbal Reports):
a. Economic Development
b. Planning Commission Agenda (attached)
c. City Council
d. Chamber of Commerce
7. Adjournment (8:00am)
MINUTES
INDUSTRIAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (IEDC)
Tuesday, April 2nd, 2019 — 7:00 a.m.
North Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Members Present: Darek Vetsch, Kevin Steffensmeier, Joni Pawelk, Wayne Elam, Luke
Dahlheimer, Dick Van Allen, Don Roberts, Andrew Tapper, Christopher Church,
Elizabeth Calpas, and Randy Skarphol
Members Absent: Steve Johnson, Mike Carr, and Kari Moorhouse
Liaisons Present: Jim Thares, Matt Leonard, Wayne Oberg, Mark Birkholz, Marcy Anderson,
Duane Northagen, and Dave Tombers
1. Call to Order
Darek Vetsch called the meeting of the IEDC to order at 7:04 a.m.
2. Approve Minutes:
a. March 5th, 2019 meeting minutes
LUKE DAHLHEIMER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 5TH, 2019 IEDC
MINUTES. KEVIN STEFFENSMEIER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED, 11-0.
3. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda
Joni Pawelk asked if they could introduce each other.
4. Consideration of Appointing IEDC member to the Comprehensive Plan Proposal
Review Committee
Jim Thares indicated that four proposals for the Comprehensive Plan were received. The
first phase would be a visioning session, with the second being the updated
Comprehensive Plan. Staff were looking for one person to represent the IEDC on a
review committee that would review each of the four proposals and make a
recommendation to the City Council.
JONI PAWELK MOVED TO NOMINATE ELIZABETH CALPAS AS THE
INDUSTRIAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE
TO 2040 MONTICELLO COMMUNITY VISION & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PROPOSAL REVIEW SUB -COMMITTEE. KEVIN STEFFENSMEIER SECONDED
THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 11-0.
5. Update on Stormwater Management Ordinance, Matt Leonard, City Engineer
Matt Leonard provided the history of stormwater management and the requirement for
cities to have a separate utility for stormwater. Currently, Leonard indicated that the City
spends approximately $300,000 per year on stormwater management. He explained that
in order to offset some of those costs, the City is proposing a stormwater fee for
residential and non-residential properties. It was noted that $1 per drainage unit per
month would be charged to residential customers and $7 dollars per impervious acre(s)
per month would be charged for any non-residential property. There would be no cost for
cemeteries, parks, or right-of-ways. Leonard noted that most surrounding cities have this
fee in place already. The fee would be charged starting on July 1St, 2019.
6. Table Topic — Review of FiberNet Monticello by Mark Birkholz, ArA2
Mark Birkholz provided an update to the IEDC regarding FiberNet. He indicated that on
July 1, 2016, the City of Monticello hired Arvig to manage FiberNet. Birkholz gave an
overview of Arvig along with the history of the company. He noted that the company
started in 1950 and currently has services in 48 counties of Minnesota. Arvig currently
has approximately 45,000 internet customers and 20,000 television customers.
Birkholz noted that since the City has chosen Arvig to completely manage the company,
expenses have decreased, while revenues have increased.
Discussion by the IEDC about the costs of running fiber to new developments and
redevelopments occurred.
Birkholz also discussed the services that Arvig provides and included information on the
importance of 5G.
Lastly, Birkholz indicated that Minnesota has received approximately 85 million dollars
in grants to support broadband throughout the state.
7. Consideration of Update of BR&E Visits/Schedule
Jim Thares indicated that staff have secured Business Retention and Expansion visits for
2019. A schedule was provided in the IEDC agenda packet. Thares asked that up to two
IEDC members participate per visit.
The following confirmed participation during the visits:
• Wallboard (04/16/19) — Kevin Steffensmeier and Joni Pawelk
• Aroplax (04/24/2019) — Kevin Steffensmeier and Duane Northagen
• Midwest Precision Machining (05/21/2019) — Randy Skarphol
• WSI/Polaris (05/28/2019) — Marcy Anderson
• UMC (06/18/2019) — Joni Pawelk
8. Reports (Verbal Reports):
a. Economic Development
Jim Thares provided an update regarding Economic Development activities. A
summary is included below:
• Fire Station is expected to begin construction in June, 2019 and be
complete by February, 2020.
• The Briggs Companies apartment complex (3rd Street/Locust Street) has
received building permits for footings and foundation. Permits for the
structure have been applied for and are currently in review by the Building
Department.
• Monticello RV has received final approval by the City Council for the
construction of a new facility along Chelsea Road. They are requesting a
loan from the EDA in the amount of $118,500 for a gap in financing. The
estimated cost of the project is 4.4 million.
• A Hispanic grocery store and bakery is coming to the Sixth Street Station
building.
• Headwater's Development is working towards their next set of land use
approvals for the construction of a senior living facility along Hart
Boulevard.
• Fred's Building has completed renovations and is the new home of the
Monti Art's program.
• Riverwood Bank would be completing a small renovation project at their
facility.
Thares also provided a summary of Building Department permits issued to date.
The prospect list was discussed as provided in the agenda.
b. Planning Commission Agenda
The Planning Commission agenda was discussed as provided in the agenda.
c. City Council
Jim Thares indicated that Kari Moorhouse was approved by the City Council to
be on the IEDC. He also noted that amendments to the bylaws to allow the
participation of up to two high school students was also approved. The school
district would be responsible for selecting the students to serve on the committee.
d. Chamber of Commerce
Marcy Anderson indicated that early -bird registration for the Chambers golf event
was ending on April 12th. She stated that registration is filling up and that the
sponsorships are full.
Anderson explained that Eric Olson, the Monticello Public Schools
Superintendent would be speaking at the next Chamber Lunch on April 16`x'
9. Adiournment
Darek Vetsch adjourned the meeting at 8:04 a.m.
Recorder: Jacob Thunander
Approved: May 7, 2019
Attest:
Jim Thares, Economic Development Director
IEDC Agenda — 5/07/2019
4. Consideration of a recommendation regarding proposed amendments to the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance for Industrial Self -Storage (NAC/AS)
Property: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park, 108 Dundas Road
A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND
The IEDC is asked to provide a recommendation as related to a proposed ordinance
amendment that has arisen from a PUD amendment application request. The
proposed ordinance amendments relate to industrial self -storage uses. Staff is asking
for direction from the IEDC on the proposed amendments, which will in turn, provide
guidance to the Planning Commission on the applicant's request.
Mr. Ken Spaeth, property owner and developer of an I -2 -zoned parcel located on
Dundas Road, previously received city approval for the establishment of Spaeth
Industrial Park, an 8 -lot industrial subdivision and planned unit development. The
plat and PUD, while approved, have not yet begun development. The site plan and
plat are attached for reference. The PUD project incorporates a series of individual
6,976 square foot industrial buildings, each of which can be subdivided into 3
separate 2,325 square foot bays and will be developed with municipal services.
Mr. Spaeth is seeking an amendment to the approved PUD to accommodate the use
and ownership of the individual bays for larger -scale personal storage or hobby use,
in addition to the industrial uses of the site otherwise allowed in the district.
In relationship to the use proposed, within Monticello's Zoning Ordinance, Self -
Storage is not currently a permitted use in the I-2 District, which the PUD uses as the
underlying district defining permitted and conditional uses. However, "Self -Storage"
is a use allowed by Conditional Use Permit in the B-3 (Highway Business) District,
and as a permitted use in the I-1 (Light Industrial) District. General Warehousing is a
Conditional Use in the B-3 and IBC (Industrial Business Campus) Districts, and
Permitted in the I-1 and I-2 (Heavy Industrial) Districts.
General Warehousing is defined as follows:
GENERAL WAREHOUSING: Structures used for the storage or distribution
of goods where there is no sale of items to retailers or the general public
unless permitted as an accessory use to the warehouse
Currently, the zoning ordinance does not have a definition of "Self -Storage". In
Monticello, and the surrounding region, "Self -Storage" businesses are characterized
by buildings that have a variety of sizes of storage units in larger buildings, which
rent to any user by the month. Sizes of units typically range as small as 50 square
feet to 400 square feet — there are a few locations that have a limited supply of space
up to 1,000 square feet in area.
IEDC Agenda — 5/07/2019
Warehousing, in contrast, is characterized by larger facilities that nearly always have
separate dock or overhead door access. In addition, there is little, if any, site traffic
created by the general public.
To accommodate the applicant's request, and avoid mixing smaller high -traffic self -
storage commercial activities with industrial uses, staff is suggesting that definitions
be added to the zoning ordinance that distinguishes "Commercial Self -Storage" from
"Industrial Self -Storage", and allocate each use to the appropriate zones or land use
districts (since most of these facilities are developed through PUD zoning). The
addition of the industrial self -storage component also addresses the accessory uses
which often accompany such storage uses.
Staff proposes the following definitions as it relates to the ordinance amendments and
to Mr. Spaeth's PUD amendment.
Amend the zoning ordinance to create definitions for both commercial and
industrial self -storage uses. These definitions do not currently exist within the
code and a Self -Storage definition is necessary regardless of the outcome on the
applicant request and other amendments.
2. Allow "Industrial Self -Storage" by CUP only in the I-1 and I-2 Districts, with a
definition proposed as follows:
INDUSTRIAL SELF -STORAGE: A land use characterized by larger spaces
available to occupants for the purposes of storage of commercial, industrial, or
personal goods, as well as business, industrial, or hobby activities accessory to
such storage as permitted within the zoning district, provided that no such
space is subdivided to a total area that is less than 2-1,000 square feet in area.
It should be noted that when proposed to include multiple principle use storage
buildings on a single parcel, a project will require authorization through PUD.
For Industrial Self -Storage, the use standards proposed include a restriction that
each separate space be required to have its own overhead door and separate
service door as a way of ensuring that the space is not further subdivided to sizes
below the "industrial" threshold. That is, common overhead door access between
occupants will not be permitted.
Commercial Self -Storage is not at issue in terms of the use, however the
ordinance is proposed to be amended to provide a definition and to limit such
storage to the B-3 District. The proposed definition is as follows:
COMMERCIAL SELF -STORAGE: A land use characterized by a variety of
sized spaces available to the general public for rent on short-term periods, and
for which size of individual spaces are less than 1,000 square feet in area.
Oil
IEDC Agenda — 5/07/2019
Commercial Self -Storage facilities are limited to storage use only, with no
separate business activities permitted as part of the use.
Under these definitions, staff would recommend that "Commercial Self -Storage"
be limited to the B-3 Zoning District, and that "Industrial Self -Storage" be limited
to the I-1 and I-2 Districts as Conditional Uses.
3. Recommend an amendment to PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park allowing
Industrial Self -Storage as a principal use within the PUD by -right. This
allowance would require compliance with the definition as proposed above.
Planning Commission Review
In the Planning Commission's discussion of this item during the April public hearing,
Commissioners recognized that this type of use, with accompanying accessory uses
(such as classic car storage with minor auto repair uses) has arisen as a changing
trend or condition in land use. They noted having seen this type of use occurring in
other communities. However, Commissioners noted some concern over the potential
use of industrial land for smaller commercial storage uses, noting the importance the
creation of tax base and employment in industrial areas. Mr. Keith Burnham,
property owner of Affordable Storage at 10111 Innsbrook Drive, expressed concern
regarding the 1,000 square feet size requirement. He suggested the Commission
consider increasing the size requirement to avoid conflict with commercial self -
storage uses.
After discussion, the Planning Commission tabled action and continued the public
hearing, recommending that the Industrial and Economic Development Committee
review the issue and provide a recommendation.
Staff has gathered additional information on similar types of facilities in other
communities, including Chanhassen and Medina. In summary, both communities
have permitted such uses in their industrial or business districts (similar to
Monticello's IBC district), either by right or through PUD. It should be noted that the
facilities in these communities, and others, appear to be at a much larger scale. In
many cases these storage units include accessory uses, such as office space, minor
auto repair and guest or lounge areas.
The proposed amendments as presented to the IEDC are reflective of the
Commission's discussion and the research completed since the time of the April
meeting.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
3
IEDC Agenda — 5/07/2019
1. Motion to recommend the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance establishing
"Commercial" and "Industrial" Self -Storage land uses as proposed in the May 7th,
2019 staff report and ordinance.
2. Motion to recommend the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance establishing
"Commercial" and "Industrial" Self -Storage land uses as proposed in the May 7th,
2019 staff report and ordinance, with revisions to be noted by the IEDC.
3. Motion to recommend denial of the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments
establishing "Commercial" and "Industrial" Self -Storage land uses as proposed in
the May 7th, 2019 staff report.
4. Motion of other.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, and in
subsequent action, the uses as noted within Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District. The
uses proposed should integrate well in the industrial areas of the City, without
introducing undue public activity in those locations. By separating "Commercial"
and "Industrial" self -storage, the ordinance would acknowledge the differences
between the attributes of these two distinct uses and provide a usable definition and
use allowances for application of the code.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
A. Ordinance No. X for Ordinance Amendments, Revised
B. Aerial Site Image
C. Applicant Narrative
D. Approved Spaeth Industrial Park Plans, Excerpts
E. Research Link:
htlp://www.automotolplex.com/
L!
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE
MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 5, TABLE 5-1 RELATING TO
GENERAL WAREHOUSING AND SELF STORAGE USES; SECTION 5.2 (G) (13),
RELATING TO THE PROVISION FOR "COMMERCIAL SELF STORAGE,
AND 5.2 (G)(17) RELATING TO "INDUSTRIAL SELF STORAGE";
AND SECTION 8.4, DEFINITIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA HEREBY
ORDAINS:
Section 1. Chapter 5, Table 5-1 is hereby amended as follows:
"General Warehousing" is hereby deleted as a use in the B-3, Highway Business District.
Section 2. Chapter 5, Table 5-1 is hereby amended to add the following:
Section 3. Chapter 5, Table 5-1 is hereby amended as follows:
Re -label "Self -Storage" as "Industrial Self Storage" and list as an allowable use in the I-1
and 1-2 Districts by Conditional Use Permit, subject to the requirements referenced in
Section 5.2(G)(17), and deleting as a Conditional Use Permit in the B-3 District.
Industrial Uses
Industrial Self-
ir
�
6
� I
RC
C
5.2(G)(17)
Storage
Section 4. Chapter 5, Section 5.2(G), Regulations for Industrial Uses, is hereby
amended to add the following:
Section 5.2(G)
(17) Industrial Self Storage.
(1) Such Facilities shall occupy no less than 2,000 square feet per
individual storage unit in any complex or building.
(2) All individual units shall have overhead door access and service access
separate from other units, and no common access shall be permitted.
(3) Such use shall be authorized by Conditional Use Permit.
Section 5. Chapter 8.4, Definitions is hereby amended to add the following:
COMMERCIAL SELF -STORAGE: A land use characterized by a variety of
sized spaces available to the general public for rent on short-term periods, and for
which size of individual spaces are less than 1,000 square feet in area.
Commercial Self -Storage facilities are limited to storage use only, with no
separate business activities permitted as part of the use.
INDUSTRIAL SELF -STORAGE: A land use characterized by larger spaces
available to occupants for the purposes of storage of commercial, industrial, or
personal goods, as well as business, industrial, or hobby activities accessory to
such storage as permitted within the zoning district, provided that no such space is
subdivided to a total area that is less than 2,000 square feet in area.
Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance
as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to
renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended
effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary
corrections to any internal citations and diagrams that result from such
amendments, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and
publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of
the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this _ day of , 2019.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator
VOTING IN FAVOR:
VOTING IN OPPOSITION:
Spaeth, Ken -Request for Amendment to Planned Unit Development Created by: City of Monticello
Lot 2, Block 3 Oakwood Industrial Park I PI D#155-018-0030201 108 Dundas Road
Ken Spaeth Masonry
108 Meadowlark Rd. Se.
St. Michael, Mn. 56557
612-889-3100 2-25-19
City of Monticello
Community Development
Att: Angela
In regards to the Spaeth Industrial Park I'm sending you a request to add self
storage to the PUD. The buildings I'm building are 6976 sq. ft. and are to be
subdivided into 3 -units with 2325 sq ft. each. In asking for the amendment I
would restrict subdividing the units any smaller with covenants approved by the
city.
The intent for the park is still for small business but adding additional uses of
storage/man cave.
We'd still abide by the no outside storage.
Sincerely, Ken Spaeth
KITTSON I ROSEAU
1
South Havlen
Southsider
LAKE OF
HE WOODS
MARSHALL
KOOCHICHING
BELTRAMI
PENNINGTON
RED LAKE COOK
LAKE
POLK j6 ITASCA ST. LOUIS
q�
NORMAN MAHNOMEN 3
G�
CRSS
I CLAY BECKER
AITKIN
X40 CROW CARLTON
�. OTTER TAIL WING
PINE
TODD ►AiLLE
MRAWT DOUGLA MORRISON LAcs
STEARNS TON
POPE
E'
BIG
TONE 43 URNE 13ANT1
SWIFT ANO
k0 1' RIG
LAC HIPPE4YA 4a'$RAMSEY
QUI HENNE-
PARLE N WASHINGTON
, -1.1 RENVILLE r� dR1+6R
ri
G
MINNESOTA
Geanvater
Maple Lake Tvrl
Nlapl e, Laky �-
nh Lake Tw}— `Albion Twl)
Stc
alm Twp
Middlevllle Twp Marysville Twp
r�
tela "'rt'
Hovra rd; La ke�Wavrerl,
—Victor,Two Wdodtsnd.Two
I'':lanticella ��
,r
WRIGHT COUNTY
SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
• '�. • � � � � iii t''"�!
• � r rnnnnn.��� .� �r � ■
r
i5:
boob
�4
SIBLEY
cn
LYON
FEDWOOD
(COLLET DLEEUR
GOODHUE
RIDE
�
W
WABASHA
IIID
O
BROWN
N
Qcc
4ti
HURRAY
Gwoo
WATON-
BLUE
EARTH
'b
OCL
Odd
WASTED
5'
WAN
W
�4'
�.y
d
WINONk
W
C
O
�Q
'
O
Q
�
Ewa"
J
I
RCCKNOBLES'PG,tv°�
00;-
MARTIN
�>~'��
MOWER
FILLMOR
O
C O
CL
Tmom
CL
Fft
W
����
ri
G
MINNESOTA
Geanvater
Maple Lake Tvrl
Nlapl e, Laky �-
nh Lake Tw}— `Albion Twl)
Stc
alm Twp
Middlevllle Twp Marysville Twp
r�
tela "'rt'
Hovra rd; La ke�Wavrerl,
—Victor,Two Wdodtsnd.Two
I'':lanticella ��
,r
WRIGHT COUNTY
SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
• '�. • � � � � iii t''"�!
• � r rnnnnn.��� .� �r � ■
r
i5:
boob
�4
cn
W
IIID
O
N
Qcc
woM
co
z
o
OCL
tocc
0
QCL
c O
W
c
I
Q
W
C
O
�Q
'
O
Q
�
Ewa"
J
I
Z
00;-
V
v
w
CL
O
O
C O
CL
Tmom
CL
Fft
W
W
�=
a
_/
am
co
o�
q,-00
�N
O C tr)I Lo E
co w W T4 � I a co Ln I O
V C 2 ~ I p Ln r- -O
o,
ti w i� �
c o 44 I mca 0Q.�
tq O WU, U
oaf j ►.�'�' w°��ai�
a C I I_
y .,� ►� 100 U 0
42
� q,
r" O m
u
�o o W
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Ip
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1 SITE PLAN
C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 DETAILS
C9 PHASING PLAN
CO
Project Location Plan
cn
m
o
m
o
0
LLJ
I
Q
W
0
o
a
FILE NO. 00640
CO
Project Location Plan
i I
I
I
REGRADE DITCH; COORDINATE �C 1
h O� WITH VENDOR UTILITY ch RE -GRADE DITCH; DAYLIGHT
PROVIDERS FOR RELOCATION DITCH FLOWLINE TO DRAIN;
OF UTILITIES COORDINATE WITH VENDOR
- 10" D.I.PI UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR
RELOCATION OF UTILITIES
- 15" R.C.P.
10 r? -SAN MH
o I- �_ FES- 1 /g6G FES -E �4 1
°Q �. 1'' o _ `96' IE=958.50 1 1
IE=958.00
I SAN Mh' FES- H '\ I "�' �631 960.0',_ i o 959.9 IN 9
RIM ELE IE=959.70 c�'`� J I o 96 1 FES -G a�n 56 6' - - - oQp= 960--41 - �p alio 7a
INV. ELEv.=y-fi.i °o ,• �� IE=959.50 - CB -8 - 960 '� r7 ' �_'-- FES -A 1
-
Nk _ RE=961.10 - _ _ �;�o »,-_»-�- _ X IE=958.00 I
- - - - - T 959-2X IE=957.70 -T - T_ - ,?�'���+ / _e qp_ RISER
n' - _
960.6 X/,�o►- ��� T �; ' 959.7. _ - _ 960 9so - - - - - - - - - -
-ogs�3 IC'. I 96196
ioe --�$ ----- -- ----
----
CB-9 - T-a� - 962 --_--- ---------- =- ----m- ------ o.�7 Yee _ � Y aF1 F
---- o----_ _ _ _- -- -- ----�- - - ,� - --- CB -1
9 RE= 9 61.2 0 a_ _ `- �p -------o%---��- -------_ -_ ,v� _ - - _ 6' �b 1.5 00��
IE=958.00 P 11 e''`�voo�` °° 4 ?o �� _ I 1� I RE=961.20
I ' IE=956.50 IN
} 9
�'��, 9s N g62 o��A IM o�1A �e - �ov I IE=958.00 OUT
I 1 I '9 2,� �►° EAS o,tf� 2 -- --- ----o- -- -o - 9 ---
-- --
-'o0 9 .9 - - o' ` X 963.0
X 63. -,
962.8X Q %e ;�, O1 'I 1 `� - - g3j 0 1 11 05621 X � I
w 11 1O
CN I11 I e'►'� -- `��' ---- ---- --------------------- -- 963 - 1
---- ----- -
--- ----I
m ;�• rn 11
4---- ---- ---- ----- ---- - --- 963 -- I
1 � -11 ► 4 � � � = I
109 109
11
9 .2
I
1!o g
,y` I11 , 111 I gy1g1 \
Ci z.o% 1' X 962.2 e UNDERGROUND
C)
II I lep
eo�f icfl I I61.. SYSTEM
'1 1 I1 I BUILDING A 62' BUILDING B " „ ;, X NWL = 958.00
\ 9 2'S ° 6,9 76 SF -'g 6,9 76 SF I �\ 2 YR _ 958.59
963.1 X ; O it I I;' I CB -16 I I \ 10 YR - 959.34 •2
RE=962.50 I 100 YR = 960.73
FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 FFE=963.50
! 1 `P 1 SEE DETAIL THIS
Dov I % 1 SHEET
\I I seI\ X 961.9 J `962abil.0 I 1 rn \
\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - N
3. • O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M�� °°° °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° ° -' 1
° 000000 000°000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • -
- ------------I------------ -
1 i ,--LIE}IE - ,c$ \ + o - -- - - e �, °l \\\ I
1 -
•,�---------I--------- X a r � ��1 to � I m
963.7X96 .5X I 1 "�1 la / -- .-.- g6� -.-. .-.-. -� I do 96 -�� I CB -2 963.7
__
0, / . - oeti° ,.7� >o ' = RE=961.60
CB -1 1 I 2.)% o� � IE=956.50 \
RE=961.60 I ee�>°
IE=958.20 I I 1 g6� cD
--------- -----------
� ---------------------------------------- Q
I I rn 1 �� �`--- ----- ---96i •7 --- -- - CB -10 --- ; o ° ° O ° O ° 0 0 0 0°0°0°o°o°O°O°O° �' o ;
IX 9 s -`'° °°°°°°°°° °°°RE=961.90°°°°°°opo°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° ! e°y.3.o 1 I I \
MOW- 11 � 1 ! °\°°°°°°°°° IE=958.70 ! 1 1 963 Q�
88 � , I 960.91 1 IX IX 96
LINE 1 3.0%
1 i II' 1- 1
O W I I I
1 1 I I X 961 ��X•961.0 - X! 1.� \ LINE
I
W / ' -nao n o° I I 1 rn 1� I I I
BUILDING C 9 BUILDING D
I I `° ! 12 O� 1 X 960.6 I I °' X X 963.9
1 6,9 76 SF .0.6
964.5 I II Myo I I I CO 6 9 76 SF ' ' .1 ,° 1/ X 9610.1• cam, `96�
X I i 4o i 2.0% �} ' CB -17 111 19gti 11 n I
RE=962.50
I d ---Wo F� NCE FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 FFE=963.50 \ I I
I 1 +- I 11 I' 1 I
1, 109 / 109 Q o I I I
ON fi LINE II - °�
964.4 CO' I I
11 I
\I I 9 1 1 1 X 9/ a oory�l I I `j o II Ivl l 6 Dc
1 1 9 63 -- ---- --------------- I I 1 I X 95�. 61 1 1 X 9
1 "• I1 -- 963 _ ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- -- �e ---- ---- -----11 I \ X 963.8
I \ I+^I II\ ---- ---- - - - { 1 _ 23 I `��z.5 61 \I I
I a
� 1 Z�E 60
�
9r.2 ---------------- -- --tee 1 I
�`L 3 I
s o 1 - --- - - - --- -\
i 1 .;•e-
__ - ------, � ?� - seg 1 ', � 6� �
o z.,� oar g62 z.,% '?o X \ RE -961.10 9 X 963.8
CB -13 �. 62.3I o " oN 2.7% a \
e 2.7% w - o- IE=956.50 - I
RE=961.10 0 I
@ 9
62 4o'�-�1._4_- ---- tI
IE=957.90 1. o ------------ - - - e2 ----
I� F '� \CH, AI
INLINK FENCE CORNER +
0
CB -12 I tia' II I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
1;1-2.5%I{�
I RE=961.10 i i �I I t\ 59.0 \ \ \
I \
/ f z.5� I; O "9 IE=957.60 119P1 111 I I \ \
1 �yd� 1 ---1 m� --- - ---- ---- ---- 11 1 \
_ I --- \
963.4X X 962.7 I s II 40 ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- - -- 963 -- ----- ---- - 963 -- q I I I \ \
ILMI 4 \
1 11 1 \
109 X 961.3 I ;; - 1 1 I \ \ \X 962.4
/ 10)• I1 II 109
CHAINLINK ---� 9 2 III X 961.8 961.2 X
FENCE I III /k \ J �i z.o� I I \ 11 \\ \rn X 960.5
ON LOT LINE. 1 '° 11 / I 0 1 \ \ 0 0
20% BUILDING F
BUILDING E I \ I
1 • 9g'' " 6, 9 76 SF o 1 \\ X 958.6
"o 6, 9 76 SF I
CB -18 ! 1 C; 1
i I, I iQD
o•
1 " I RE=962.50 1 X 60.41 co
J,' I FFE=963.50 �,
FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 ! 1 I )311 I 611 X 961.5 X 9 .91 00 s.or __5.1 �-I
o 0 0 MOO=
0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - ,
S° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
X962.6 �� 3.0% i, °°°°°°°°°°°°o°o°o°o°o°00000-s°°°°°° 1
1ip
----------------- - -- - --- - - �- - -i- -X o -r-- �`
�/ `,�, --- --- - ---- -} - - -- _--- �% 1 \ X 958.7
1 �� _ i g6�.-.-. .-. -� I �6 �1 I CB -4
6y�� z.1% ee��o' 0 1 RE=961.60
CB -15 I ge'eb i� 2.1%� ®o ° ''% 0
a° \ ' I
IE=956.50
RE=961.60 LO
IE=957.40 o 9 g-
111 �/� 961.4 X i X 961.3 �^�° t 961 4
_ RE=961.90 \
----------------------------=_off°----� � 1
1 � �
IE=958.70 -_ -- ---- ---- --- - z- - -
°°°°°°
°° °° °O°o°o0 °°°°° o °
2.8%
1
X 959.9
\ I
1.8%e?s01 I 1� X111 hX_961.0
II X961.3 1N \
\ '
io
' ti 11
X 962.7 '�`�8%� �11 BUILDING G °,6 \I BUILDING H 1111 ' �e,�.,�; o
II eoti I 6,976 SF _-- _ 1 6,976 SF X 61�+\-
I11 CB -19 1`
CHAINLINK -- 19 62.3 III 1 RE=962.50 \\ FFE=963.50 I II ! �II
FENCE +�- I1j� 16-11 I FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 \ i II I X 960.7
0.5 FT. WEST '10 \ II \ 1091 11
OF LOT LINE. II 109 I I
1 1 I \ 4 1 ,+
07
-9-a3-
---- ---- --- 1ooN N o
_ 2-'
'p 1
2-% CB -6-1 I \� �A I 1.1 X 960.6
1aeovaP oiaP RE=961.40 ! \ }oo� o� 961.7 ! ' : /
s a? +o o I IE=957.50 ; I e�'
X 62.4 !+ I I N �e, 11 o
9 , 5 ?o �� I
�- I I 962----'•� �`�
o�.
---------- -�----------------------- - �g
61%
962.6X s �,�' 01. -______________________________ - - - _
O6V, �,R 0 0.61% I iD rn
-_--____-- - RE 961.40
962.9x ---------------------------------~------------------ ____________________-__=962--b� IE=956.50
------------ ---- 962- ----
CB-7960 -959+ I '$ o LANDSCAPE
RE=961.40 ' 960
959 958 957+o�� ,--EDGING/MULCH
IE=957.00 958 957 e 956 $ Il Uo 0 ,'
1 1 956 s� / �.g6\' ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
$ 962.2X\--__ FES -B �, e
41\ FES -C96 IE=958.50'5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
967.2IE=957.50 I 9 --SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
9 � FES -D � � -� ' � � - -' 956 +�s �oX_o�. -
j11\ IE=957.00 � 956 I 1
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�- i 957 958 957 so I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER I� ---" 959 960 958 959 N 89°1400"
- 1 E
N 89 °14'00" E \ 960 -- __--_ -_----
----------------- - ------------- ---� i
- ------962
----- - - -- ----- --- 962 _ `1--------
------3123.56----- \ ----- ------ -----
964.2X a' - X 6.-
_-=-----------------------
------------------- X , _=---� _ /�- -� 961.3
963.7 � o 3Q __ �,F� =---961- 1 / ,00
MOW- _;o o °a�°a�_q--- ER - _ _ _ �`e--SHED962---L
- -LINE - - 960= \��-TC 958.96 - - _ _ - _ _ � _ _ _ 1 X 961-_96 1
Se �' - - - - -960- X 960.2
�ho,�` / gs9\ �c,��` STORM WATER �� \ STOP 960.5 X -TEL. -- LANDSCAPE
�X INFILTRATION BASIN ; RISER EDGING/MULCH
�G �`° LANDSCAPE GOLDEN EAGLE 1�OAD NWL = 958.50 ��_ CB 1
h ' 2 YR = 956.97 \ _SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
� EDGING ROCK •_ -- -1 �-----�-
10 YR = 958.13 � - - - PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
YL
& SHRUBS 100 YR = 959.49 1
-- 9 I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
SEE BASIN DETAIL i9 58.7
- - - ON DETAIL SHEET I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470)
-
I I I I I I
A A H r� � A _T_ F__ ahs N I I A F� F'► I� I � N I I I I
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW41 AND NEj,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
GENERAL GRADING NOTES:
1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for
Monticello, MN, and the latest Minnesota Department of Transportation
Specifications for Highway Construction and all NPDES requirements except
where modified by these contract documents.
2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project.
3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" 48 hours prior to any
excavation (1 -800-252-1166.)
4. The Grading Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground
utilities with utility companies prior to any construction, and immediately notify
the Engineer of any conflicts.
5. Erosion Control shall be constructed, as applicable, as sequenced below:
A. Silt Fence.
B. Rock Construction Entrance.
C. Demolition
D. Common excavation (grading).
E. Seed and mulch or sod (See notes on Landscape plan).
6. Final Plat shall govern for easements and lot dimensions.
7. Any erosion control items necessary to protect adjacent properties shall be
constructed by the Grading Contractor.
8. Erosion control maintenance shall be performed by the Grading Contractor, and
removed as per the Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer,
followed by all necessary restoration of disturbed area. This work shall be
incidental to the grading contract.
9. The Grading Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate
certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet
the following:
A. Within the upper 3' of streets, the Grading Contractor shall utilize
approved soils that are within 1% of the optimum moisture content as
defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with compaction
meeting 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding this compaction
by more than 1 %. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%
Standard Proctor Density, and be within 3% of the optimum moisture
content. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'.
B. Grading tolerances for the remainder of the site shall be 0.25'.
10. All areas of unsuitable soils found in the pad described above that cannot be
corrected shall be located in the field by the Grading Contractor. The Grading
Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of these areas and provide
information as to their size and location.
11. The Grading contractor shall provide positive drainage on the site at all times.
12. The Grading Contractor shall keep public streets and travel ways clear of soil
and debris. Daily cleaning at the construction entrance shall be performed,
especially at the end of each day's work.
13. All silt fence shall be removed at project completion.
14. All proposed elevations are at flow line unless otherwise noted.
15. All erosion control best manage practices shall be per City standards.
T
1�
11
LM
ca
LU
�
O
(n
N
(0
z
CU
CC
a.
"110
O
Q
J
m soft■
(D LLJ
�•+
z
LU
z
UCo z
Cc
m
W
C
w
m
o
W
0
W
ftftft
O
V
I Q
�
CC00C
Z
soft
�z
O
Q
C Q
W
MINIMUM
121:�
CU
0
o
C�
LU
=
v
FILE NO. 00633
^^
v,
C1
SITE PLAN
T
1�
11
(n
Cn
m
o
m
o
W
0
W
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
0
o
a
v
FILE NO. 00633
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1
SITE PLAN
C2
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3
SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4
STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5
LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8
DETAILS
C9
PHASING PLAN
Grading
and
Drainage
Plan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o �00
-
I
I
I
I
I
SAN MH
RIM ELEV.=961.96
INV. ELEV.=943.7
0
c 2
13
L
BUILDING
SETBACK LINE
15' EXISTING
INTERIOR SIDE
I
I
W co O
P
O co
o
O d` 14
1
O
12
CHAINLINK ---�
FENCE + \-
ON LOT LINE. O
Q6
BUILDING
SETBACK LINE
15' EXISTING
INTERIOR SIDE
CHAINLINK --�
FENCE + \-
0.5 FT. WEST LO
OF LOT LINE. 00
O
N
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER --
N 89 °14'00" E
------
3123.56 ----- -
LIIVt u
LANDSCAPE
EDGING/ROCK
& SHRUBS
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SWj AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
I
I
DUNDAS ROAD - EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
10" D.I.P.O
i i -moi i iii- I
- I WRIGHTCOUNTY,RIAL PARK,
i MINNESOTA.
� O
15" R.C.P. 00
SAN MH
RIM ELEV.=960.04
BUILDING cs- 11 10 INV. ELEV.=942.8
' I
SETBACK LINE + + + I
30' FRONT 00' 0" E Plat) + + �, , +' -
(� + + O I S
T N 8803 53 E T T T- 150.0 -T T b 14 _ `�T-- 20 00 __"TFLb RISER -
5 0.0 '300. 0 ` --- - - - - LEGEND:
+ i � 14 a
_ _ _ ___ ______ ______ �r + 6' +1 EXISTING BOUNDARY
--------------------------- �__-�___r__T__T_ �__f f _ __{__+ + �J + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + O + II `
F 'I+ + + rn N + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ;+ + + + + + + +;; \ BUILDING SETBACK LINE
+ + �o {, + + + + + + ++ + 4 + + + _p+ + + �� +
t g + + + &�7 + + + + + + + + 9 + + ++ a ++ + Y' + + o. + +I� _ _ _ _ _ - PROPOSED LOT LINE
'+IT%� + + + + + + + r + + + + + + + 7 ' + + +�+ +0+ + N + + II 1
+ + 7 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + _� _. + o + ��� +:
+ + E,1E T+ + + +__ - + + + + + + + +
____
II I O ii PROPOSED FENCE
+ -+ + 19.0- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I I
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �I
+ + + + N + + + + + + + + + 5 + 6 + + + + !; + +I; O ------------------------------
6 �c) + + + + T 3 + + + 8 + + + 1� + + � PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER
t + 8 + O O + + + + + + + + + +ii I + +1
+ I + + + + _ + _++ _ t}- tom__ - - -------------------------------- TIP OUT FLOWLINE
13
- „E _ - _ _ _ - <- - a * + 1 + I�� - - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER -
.Q I, • V ' + + 11 2
+ + +I (n ® PROPOSED PARKING STALLS
109+ +' +" BUILDING
109 cn i ��+++I+++; :: :: :: :;:; PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
u + I SETBACK LINE
I f+ + + II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
+ + �l o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
+++++; 15 EXISTING °°°°°°°°°°°°°°
' I " INTERIOR SIDE d 4 PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
Uuj_jLJ1L1V L' nlrLL' levnlJ BUILDING
SETBACK LINE
15' REAR
F-- - - - - -I
I I
A F-� n h r- _T_ n I��r---
014 -0-0- 0
---- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\
5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
12
I �
o d W
�}- O
O
CD
C\2
O
�p � O
--5.1 +\-
0
0
BUILDING
SETBACK LINE
15' EXISTING
INTERIOR SIDE
0
0
�--5.2 +\-
DO
N
+ +"+ + ' I +'I'J °
+ + + + +I + + + I 1
I �,+ + +?! °
+ + +I+ + + 4 ;f'`�S + + I�
+ +I + + + ,o +-I+ + Y o
+ + + t JLF + + + + l y;
9 + + 4 ++++ + + + +
"T + + + + + + + + + }:
+ + +-
------------------
0
o LANDSCAPE
---EDGING/MULCH
-- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
rn 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
41 -Lw -r-
114
---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
-- - 15 ---
N 89°14'00" E
149.8 -- t- -- I
---------_ %-= ------ i ------ 1899.53------
OA ::=_i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0 J ----�.
SHE`3 366
I
I
I
CURB 13 13 13
STOP LANDSCAPE
RISER EDGING/MULCH
CB
ELEV.=958- -.16=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470)
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
n 1 n I n F--'\ F'i I S I N I I I I
SITE PLAN NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR
EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS
AND STOOPS.
2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING.
MATCH EXISTING GRADES.
3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED
WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE
LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO
PAVING.
5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO
BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT
APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL
OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL.
6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT
STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL
TRUNCATED DOME PANELS.
7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL
FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED.
8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL
EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN.
9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS
WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES.
10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF
1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED
AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE
WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL
REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION
OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY
REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITIES.
2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL
GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH
THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE
OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE
ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS.
3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL
UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC.
4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL
SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE
MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT
PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE
THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE
AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN
THE SOILS REPORT.
5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE
BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE
THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES
TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL
COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR
TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE.
6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD
VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL
NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES.
NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK
HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON
THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN.
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
SITE DATA:
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING PID:
EXISTING LOT AREA:
LOT 1 1 :
1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
155-018-003020
190,770 SF = 4.38 ACRES
PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS:
64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA
2,822
SF =
0.06
ACRES
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
150,032
SF =
3.44
ACRES >> 78.27.
NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE
147,210
SF =
3.38
ACRES
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA
41,800
SF =
0.96
ACRES >> 21.87o
DISTURBANCE AREA
200,441
SF =
4.60
ACRES
PARKING DATA:
REQUIRED
PARKING STALLS:
OFFICE @
1 /200sf; 10%
x 55,808 sf
/ 200 = 28 SPACES
WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90%
x 55,808 sf
/ 2,000 = 25 SPACES
Total= 53 SPACES
PROVIDED
PARKING STALLS:
0o
W
9' x 20'
SPACES = 90 SPACES
(INCL 8 HC
SPACES)
SETBACK: 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING
FRONT EXISTING 30 6
STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6
INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6
INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0
REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6
KEY NOTES:
O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET
O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE
2 W/611X611-#10/10 W.W.M. (CONST. JTS @ 12' O.C.) OVER 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE
BASE. MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A
MANUAL PLACEMENT.
OCONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE
W 6"X6"-#10 10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 6' O.C. . SEE SECTION ON SHEET C4.0.
MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A
MANUAL PLACEMENT. INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN
ACCEPTABLE OPTION.
O D412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461)
MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461)
O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER
MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461)
MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 246 1)
NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS
TO BE CONSTRUCTED.
PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT
O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING
DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP.
O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT.
OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS. R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON
O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL
CHANNEL POST.
O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT.
10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN.
O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO
MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH.
12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE.
13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE.
14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST
a STOP
b DO NOT ENTER
c DO NOT EXIT
d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW)
15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1 SITE PLAN
C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 DETAILS
C9 PHASING PLAN
�4
cc
U)
0
":c
�-
W
0o
W
W
J
ftl
N
ql�co
'o
co
CL
03
oa:
to
�
�
1�
Z
o
Z!
N z
W
y
as
C
J 3
z CL
Q
>
p
D
V
� cn
?a
�
oc
Q_
uj
LV
co
amQ
co
N
U)
0
0
0o
W
W
Q
v
ti
0
o
a
v
FILE NO. 00633
C1
Site Plan
O
00
I
I
SAN MH
RIM ELEV.=961.96
INV. ELEV.=943.7
-961-`
960.6 Xj �o
---gc0gi�i3
- - 962.1
ACCESS DRIVE AND
ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO o
BE INSTALLED AS PART OF W
PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS �
963.1 X) O
I
963.7 X s
96.5 X I
I 1
I
964.3 I I
tPl I I
I l
IX
MOW --,�
LINE
"o I
� w I
I I I
964.5X II I
I '
964.4�
\ I
II
I
I \
I \
{ I
I I
I I
i I
I
I '
1
963.4X X 962.7
CHAINLINK ---�
FENCE + \-
ON LOT LINE.
ACCESS DRIVE AND
ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO
BE INSTALLED AS PART OF
PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS
CHAINLINK
FENCE + \-
0.5 FT. WEST
OF LOT LINE.
962.6X
962.9X
967.2 "'
ilk\
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- i IXC
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER
N 89 °14'00" E
-----3123.56----- 964
DUNDAS ROAD
ir", Rr
T
- - LINL '/ -gr3n-
;'
LANDSCAPE / GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD �h�1
EDGING/ROCK
& SHRUBS SAN MH
ELEV -958 59 --
�,s2�� I
1
�hc -
� � o
00
n -SAAN MH
/960 RIM ELEV.=960.04
959.90 INV. ELEV,.=942.8
959.79
{--/ C, ---- I
+; X 958.6 I
20
RISER-
X 961.5
�I
X 963.0
ss2 II II O� 62.1
Xo' I
--963
= I
ACCESS DRIVE AND
III g621y1 \ ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO
" I BE INSTALLED AS PART OF
B coo I " 61.9 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS
SF I f iI I III )
III I I \\ \I / X 964.2
50
oti \ X 96, 6'
i I X 61 00
\
I
-- -----------------------
A° I m \
m
(?° i 96" o II = X\961j8X 963.7
e ' c \ \
I \ \ \\
.4
\ I Q\0
-
°
i I I 960.94 I iX 6 \IX 96s�
__---MOW I I I
961.0 IX�1.� 1N LINE
I I
IG D
SF I i I4<ti�° `9611 X 960.6 I I w X X 963.9
l i I g62°i l n X 960.) �I 966
Q I 1 II I
3.50 I I
I III
I
III I I � I CO
Q I I J
III ,
I ' i II°� 96, o I X95.61 \ IIX X 963.8
_ 23 I j I III 1 Q0 11
96ti
--
X ---��o9s,2 X FO 5�.5 I g6, 0
06 g62 ° ��959.4 �� X 963.8
° I r° \ I
o o ,__ ---�---,CHAI NLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
, I 9 59.0
I 9628 ii I I ii I O I \ \ \\ \ \
963 _ - - - - I III uo I II \ \ \\ X
a i II I O I I \\\
)g X 961.3 i I I \\ \ \\ \X 962.4
°
/
oX 960.5
' N G F
5 SF C° I III I' I 1 \ X 958.6
u i 1
I X 160.411 coo
33.50 II ° �
--� X9 .9--5.1\-� I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 i O
0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
i
`'9
X 958.7
�L° 96,, ii 1
06 0 o ACCESS DRIVE AND
I I 1 ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO
BE INSTALLED AS PART OF
PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS
--- � X 961.3 ------ ko I I 96 �.4 �
00000000 00 0 0 0 o°o°o°o°o°o°
X 959.9
I� I IBX 961.0
961.3 -
IN
II I
ii k�6`��I iil o I
)ING H ! I h
' l l 6�� I I O I
16 SF X 6h.,; � ;I -- 5It
. +\-
I
163.50 II = II ° /
I! I I I X 960.7
109 r I I 0 I
If
=9fi3--- ----- ---- -- --QI ' ! C14 0 I
6'LfO°I X 9 1.1 X 960.6
95
°.1.7
C6 1 =
I ss,ss I o
-962
'do I
s
d
6co
O -� o
--°-------------------------------
- -----------------------
960 959 I o o LANDSCAPE
958 957- se +90° ,--EDGING/MULCH
956$ so \ Q !
+ ,g6 ' ,-- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
X961.8 0)17 f ;' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
-96'
956 960.9
6� 9 /---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
Z?, 3 r 9571 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
958
960 959 � ' � � '� N 89°14'00" E
------ -- ---X--
- ------18 9 9.53 -----
9 62---- ----------- i -
*oco>e�o _ _ _
CD / X961.3 ---------------
SHED\962-_-L� J.
X 961.6 g61
- - _ - -960- X 960.2
CURB 960.5XI -TEL LANDSCAPE
STOP IRISER EDGING/MULCH
- CB ,
��LEV.=958.16-SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
\
'-------PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1
F --- -I------- F -------
I ------)
I n I I F__ n F-) n 11- _T_ n I_T_ �` �h� �G n I n i n n h► I S I N I I I I
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
PROJECT PHASING TIMELINE
PHASE 1 2017-2018
PHASE 2 2018-2019
PHASE 3 2020-2021
PHASE 4 2022-2023
MARKET CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN
MODIFICATION OF PHASING TIMELINE
AND PHASING OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Lu
N
(J ct� C) LoCL
Q
4-1
LTJ p Z
-0 W c:
_ O C Ld
.0 CL
CL 00
4-1
Q) L'j CL
UJ
a
o �
a�
co
O
may'
�
O
QOQ
(D N
W
E
Q
W
a�oL I o
I
U L O
Z
OLO O�-6
Sao
stzh
0
O
I m
y °
a
1W'ox
v
m
U
O �
\15
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1
SITE PLAN
C2
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3
►�
0042 O
CL
C4
STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
t E v
S
�O7
p
C6
O
q,`
C7
m
O
C8
DETAILS
� 3
a
q
Q
Phasing Plan
O
O
QOQ
W
Q
v
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
0
o
a
v
FILE NO. 00633
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1
SITE PLAN
C2
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3
SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4
STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5
LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8
DETAILS
C9
PHASING PLAN
Phasing Plan
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, May 7th, 2019 - 6:00 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Commissioners: Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Katie Peterson
Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler
Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Jacob Thunander, Ron
Hackenmueller
1. General Business
A. Call to Order
B. Consideration of approving minutes
a. Regular Meeting Minutes — April 2nd, 2019
C. Citizen Comments
D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
E. Consideration to approve agenda
2. Public Hearings
A. Continued Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for amendment to Planned
Unit Development for Indoor Self -Storage Facilities
Applicant: Ken Spaeth
B. Public Hearing - Consideration of Request for Amendment to Conditional Use
Permit for Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a Rezoning to a PUD District,
Development Stage PUD, and Preliminary Plat for the Development of a 48 unit
Single Family Residential in an R -A (Residential Amenities) District
Applicant: R.W. Land Holdings, LLC
C. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for amendment to Monticello Zoning
Ordinance Chapter 2, Section 4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements,
Chapter 3, Section 4 Residential Base Zoning Districts, Chapter 3, Section 7
Overlay Zoning Districts, Chapter 4, Section 10 Grading, Drainage, Stormwater
Management & Erosion Control, Chapter 5, Section 1 Use Table, Chapter 5,
Section 2 Use -Specific Standards, Chapter 5, Section 3 Accessory Use Standards,
and Chapter 8, Section 4 Definitions
Applicant: City of Monticello
3. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration of Driveway and Parking Requirements
B. Consideration of the Community Development Directors Report
4. Added Items
5. Adjournment