IDC Agenda 12-20-1984
.
~EM
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL EVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Thursday, December 2 , 1984 - 7:00 A.M.
Monticello City Hall
Members:
Co-Chairman Jay Morrell, Co-Chairman Gary Wieber,
Wayne Bidwell, John Bond us, Tom Eidem, Bruce Gagnelius,
Arve Grimsmo, Ron Hoglu d, Shelly Johnson, Harvey
Kendall, Dale Lungwitz,Bud Schrupp, Don Smith, and
Allen Pelvit.
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of Minutes of the Re ular Meeting Held November 14,
1984.
3. Consideration of Appointing C airman and Vice-Chairman for
1985.
.
4. Consideration of Adopting 198 Action Plan and Updating
the (1990) 5-year Work Progra .
5. Consideration of Purchasing a Minnesota Manufacturers Directory.
6. Other Business.
7. Adjournment.
.
.
MI TES
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Wednesday, November 4, 1984 - 7:00 A.M.
Monticello City Hall
Members Present:
Co-Chairman Jay
Wieber, Wayne B
Shelly Johnson,
Don Smi th, and
Morrell, Co-Chairman Gary
dwell, Arve Grimsmo, Ron Hoglund,
Harvey Kendall, Bud Schrupp,
llen Pelvit.
Co-Chairman Jay Morrell opened the meeting asking for approval
of the 10/18/84 minutes. Arve Gr msmo moved to approve the
minutes and was seconded by Shell Johnson. Passed 11-0.
Allen introduced Wayne Bidwell, 0
newest IDC member. He stated tha
on a project he is working on at
er of Best-in-Webb, as our
Wayne would give a report
he end of the meeting.
The next item on the agenda dealt with choosing a professional
(instant recognition) voice-over or our video update, starting
with a sample of Dave Moore's voi e. Each voice was briefly
listened to. Jay Morrell asked w 0 the others were. Allen
stated that the names were not ve well known; however, their
voices were. The Committee asked for the cost of Dave Moore
versus any of the other voices. en Allen stated that the
additional cost of $400 covered a 1 voices, Don Smith moved
to use Dave Moore's voice for the video update and was seconded
by Gary Wieber. Passed 11-0. Do Smith asked what progress
had been made to date. Allen sta ed that a majority of the
outdoor shots were taken and the emainder would be taken in
the spring. During the winter mo ths, editing and scripting
would be completed. The completi n of the video was scheduled
for June. Co-Chairman Morrell as' ed if we had a deadline with
River City. Allen stated that we did not. Don Smith and Jay
Morrell questioned why it would t; ke as long as 9 months to
complete the video production. A len stated that this was mainly
due to capturing FSI, Bondhus, an the old Maus Food building
after their completions. Another reason was to spread out the
amount of work needed to rework t e script. Allen stated that
this must be worked in between ot er duties and projects. The
consensus of the Committee was to proceed with completion of
the update. They felt that if we waited, something else would
come up and postpone it even longer. Don Smith questioned the
need for showing this at future trade shows, etc. Allen stated
that he would be going to some t ade shows if they were industrial
orientated, but as a spectator 0 ly. In the meantime, we have
our current video to show. Gary Wieber asked how soon we could
get River City Video to complete the updated production, and
.
.
1-
.
Allen stated that they (River Cit
complete production early because
The consensus of the Committee wa
as soon as possible. They direct
City Video formulating a time tab
to the 12/20/84 meeting with a pr
Morrell asked if River City video
sample footage taken. He felt it
without seeing the footage. AIle
a time frame for the remaining sh
etc., for a 2/1/85 completion. A
on the December agenda.
IDC Minutes - 11/14/84
Video) would be happy to
they receive payment early.
to complete the video production
d Allen to work with River
e for completion and return
gress report. Co-Chairman
should be presenting us with
difficult to prepare a script
was then directed to obtain
oting, editing, scripting,
progress report should be
Allen explained that the Departme t of Economic Development
has proposed a cooperative advert sing program for the current
22 Star Cities. The action neede at this meeting is for the
Committee to decide whether to pu sue the advertising program.
The second question is which opti n, $20,000.00 or $30,000.00,
and instate or national publicati He indicated that a majority
of the cities will decide which d"rection will be taken. At
that point, more information on t e ads themselves will be made
available. Allen stressed the fa t that our participation is
not mandatory at this time. The ommittee's consensus was to
explore the possibility of a co-o, advertising program but not
commit any money to the program. Having ads directing attention
to Monticello as a Star City is c rtainly better than an ad
stating that the 22 Star Cities a More information would
be forthcoming before the Committ e joined the program. Bud
Schrupp moved to pursue the Star ity Co-op advertising program
and return to the Committee with ore information. It was seconded
by Gary Wieber. Passed 11-0.
.
Co-Chairman Morrell reviewed the sign program
and asked Allen to update the Co ittee on the matter. Allen
stated that Mr. Brown of the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) returned his call and briefly explained a letter that
was addressed to Senator Dave Du enburger. The letter was from
the Director of the FHWA and exp ained that the sign was not
in federal violation; however, t e right to regulate interstate
signage was given to each state. At this point, Arve Grimsmo
stated that he would contact the Public Works Director to replace
the current Monticello road sign on 1-94 with the new Star
City road signs. It was the Co ittee's feelings that this
was a state program, and we will do what we have to to install
our signs. If asked to remove t e signs, perhaps we could get
some publicity. Arve Grimsmo ma e the motion to have the Public
Works Director replace the old M nticello signs with the new
Star City road signs and was see nded by Don Smith. Passed 11-0.
The Committee questioned whether the Star City should be installed
separately, replace the existing sign, or added to the existing
sign, and decided to replace the existing signs.
.
2-
.
IDC Minutes - 11/14/84
Co-Chairman Morrell reviewed the survey designed for locating
strengths and weaknesses in Monticello's development process.
He felt this was something that as taken time to develop and
should be implemented soon. He Iso stated that he thought
a survey/questionnaire with chec type answering system. This
would allow the developer a chan e to think over their answers
prior to Allen's call. It was a so suggested to have a set
of pre-arranged questions to ask the developers. Shelly Johnson
suggested using the cover letter as a basis for the actual survey/worksheet
type questionnaire. The Committ e directed Allen to draft a
sample questionnaire and return 0 Committee members as soon
as possible.
.
In other business, Co-Chairman M
that Delano has recruited as of
that a few Committee members vis
Pizza in Norwood and since has d
Lake. Allen stated that he had
Garth with a more definite propo
building and one that included a
tax increment finance numbers we
relocate in Maple Lake. One of
close to his home in Annandale.
City officials in Annandale, it
stated that Maple Lake explains
financing. It works like this:
the property, and the taxes
He stated that this did not
could not compete with this type
by a Maple Lake businessman, that
such as Monticello uses. Jay Mo
is tying all these things togeth
the City Council was making thes
also get back in touch with Bud
on Maple Lake's TIF process.
Gary Wieber commented on the re
to prepare for his HRA budget p
He added that we dwell much mor
or do not attract than those we
members of this Committee and t
approximately four industries.
provide approximately 400 ~ j
year, estimated market value of
base of $181,000. Co-Chairman
played a roll in some of that d
Committee believed that if it w
relationship with the Johnson's
in Monticello. This report did
created by Wrightco or Bondhus,
.
rrell mentioned the new businesses
ate. shelly Johnson stated
ted with Mr. Bud Garth of Bud's
cided to relocate to Maple
een back in touch with Mr.
al, one that included a new
existing building. More specific
e given, and he elected to
is main concerns was being
Whatever problem he had with
as not resolved. Allen further
heir process as tax increment
The developer pays $5,000 for
orgiven for a number of years.
appropriate and that Monticello
of offer. Allen was told,
there were no legal documents
rell asked who in Maple Lake
r. Allen stated that it appeared
deals. Allen stated he would
arth and get more information
ort that Don Cochran asked Allen
esentation to the Council.
on the business that we lose
do. During the last two years,
e HRA have been involved with
They have or will expect to
bs, annual salaries of $5.7 million/
$3.9 million, additional tax
ieber stated that this Committee
velopment. For example, the
re not for shelly's personal
IXI might not have located
not indicate additional jobs
etc.
-3-
.
Don Smith stated that we may do
Economic Development process cor
developer lives, or where his re
factor in their decision. He fu
read into the Delano article ano
person, was a good friend to the
Arve Grimsmo stated that Mr. Gil
now out-of-business Delano Grani
State Bank of Delano.
Don Smith indicated that this Co
are not interested in giving awa
to seriously discuss in the futu
to compete with the cities who a
stated that he was not intereste
He would be more interested in f
It was the consensus of the Comm
of the HRA report available for
could be used at the Chamber mee
.
Wayne Bidwell commented on the d
that this would be helpful to fi
He added that his firm is prepar
if we wished to use some footage
it. Wayne complimented Allen fo
package on Monticello. It was u
called Pandoring Enterprises. I
for an initial 400,000 sq. ft. b
300,000 sq. ft. in a year or two
be created and equipment expendi
60-65 acres would be needed for
The project was scheduled for Ma
not have already been purchased
development park. Wayne stated
project. He felt that money was
Pandora that he would like to kee
in Monticello. He shared our la
information with Mr. Pandora. H
is a factor. They want the new
This plant prints, assembles, an
such as Playboy, J.C. Penney, Se
IDC Minutes - 11/14/84
things required in the
however, where the owner/
atives live may be a very significant
ther stated that you could
her way. Don Gillmore, a pro-Delano
president of the new company.
more was the president of the
e company. He also owns the
ittee and certainly the City
land. This may be something
e should it become impossible
e giving the farm away. Don
in this type of give away.
rms that are not looking for give-aways.
ttee to have Allen have copies
he December meeting. This
ings, too.
velopers survey. He stated
ms, and his firm in particular.
ng a video production; and
he would be glad to supply
assembling the information
ed in negotiating with a firm
short, this project calls
ilding with expansion of another
Seventeen Hundred jobs would
ures of $112 million. Approximately
his project.
Ie Grove. Land mayor may
n one Maple Grove industrial
hat this would not kill the
no object. Wayne told Mr.
his business and employees
or surveys and demographic
was impressed; however, time
lant on line by July, 1985.
binds magazines and catalogs
rs, and Montgomery Ward catalogs.
Drawing employees for this proje t will be from the St. Cloud
area plants. Mr. Pandora was gi en assurances from Wayne that
drawing personnel from St. Cloud and the metro area is documented
by his employment records.
.
Wayne stated that this project i
time; and if the need arises to
a remote possibility at this
ave a meeting with leaders
4-
IDC Minutes - 11/14/84
.
of the community, he would be ha y to arrange it. Mr. Pandora
is currently considering speaking at a Rotary meeting. When
more information is available, Wa ne will let us know.
When members of the Committee in ired of the chance of this
project becoming a reality, Wayne stated that it will happen.
He has been given the responsibil'ty of arranging the physical
layout of the plant, machinery, a d given the limits for salaries
and bonuses for employees.
There being no further business, o-Chairman Morrell adjourned
the meeting.
rul~~
Allen L. Pelvit
Director of Economic Development
.
.
IDC Agenda - 12/20/84
.
3. Consideration of Ap ointing Chair an and Vice-Chairman for 1985. (A.P.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As in the past, December has been the month designated for appointing
successors for Chairman and Vice- hairman of the Committee.
As you may recall, past Chamber P esidents had become Chairman
of the Committee; however, this hi s recently changed to appointing
from within.
At the December
and appoint new
each year are:
The Secretary's
Development.
15, 1983, meeting, the Committee voted to nominate
officers each ye~. Three positions to be filled
1) Chairman; 2) Vice Chairman; and 3) Treasurer.
position will be eld by the Director of Economic
Responsibilities of the Chairman ill be to preside over all
meetings and functions held by t e Committee. In the event
the Chairman cannot attend a meeting/event, then the Vice-Chairman
will assume these responsibilities.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Make one motion to accept th present officers as nominees
for 1985.
.
2. Ask for nominations and vote for each officer individuallY,
C. RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended to ask for nom"nations and vote for each officer
individually. In this way an of icer who wishes to remain Treasurer,
for example, could do so while C airman and Vice-Chairman could
change.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Refer to 12/15/83 agenda, Item # , and the 12/15/83 minutes.
.
1-
IDC Agenda - 12/20/84
.
4. Consideration of Ado ting 1985 Ac ion Plan and Updating the
(1990) 5-year Work Program. (A.P.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This item is part of the Star Cit
as part of the recertification pr
the various tasks that the Commit
in 1985. It also explains the pu
well as its completion date, who/
the task was assigned to, and the
particular activity.
Program and is also required
cess. The Action Plan outlines
ee will attempt to complete
pose of each activity, as
hat Committee member or sub-committee
results anticipated from the
As in the past, a majority of the Action Plan is repeated each
year and will be completed accord ngly. However, those items
that are new to the Action Plan w 11 be delegated appropriatelY
among the sub-committees.
1985 has been said by some econom sts to be a flat year. In
order for Monticello not to get c ught short, it is mandatory
to not only pass this Action Plan but to follow through with
it.
.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt both the 1985 Action PI n and the 1990 Updated 5-year
Work Program as proposed.
2.
Adopt either the Action Plan
Program, but not the other.
be made and then later adopte .
the Updated 5-year Work
this case, a revision must
C. RECOMMENDATION:
The 1985 Action Plan is the more
I feel both should be adopted at
redominant of the two; however,
he same time.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of 1985 Action Plan and 1990 Updated 5-year Work Program.
.
.
FIVE-YEAR ACT ON PLAN 1990
Add:
- Review City's Zon ng Ordinances
- Encourage Specula lve Building
- Industry Day
- Industry Banquet
- Update Monticellol VCR Production
- update Labor Surv y/Community Profiles
- Update Community act Booklet
1985 ACT ON PLAN
* - Actively Promote Monticello y Implementing a Prospecting
Program.
+ - Expand on Study of Availablel Financing Tools.
* - Attend Trade Shows as Specta or (search for mfgr or industrial
exhibi tors) .
- Encourage Speculative Build! g.
.
* - Promotion, Publicity,
+ - Finance, Sites, and Building
# - Research and Planning
* - Industry Day/Banquet.
* - Update and Target Mailing Li t.
* - Make Targeted Mailings.
# - update, Collate, and Bind C rent Data Plan.
+ - Update Retail/Commercial/Ind strial Building Inventory.
+ - Update Utilities and Transpo tation Information.
# - Review City Ordinances.
* - Adopt Advertising Campaign f r 1986.
Sub-Committee.
* - Produce Monticello Magazine.
# - Adopt 1990 5-year Work Progr m.
# - Adopt 1986 Action Plan.
# - Adopt 1986 Budget.
# - Recertify as a Star City.
.
* - Encourage Development of Unp atted Industrial Property.
(j)
:~.
~
, '-
\
.j
.
,,'
.
[-E' MARiifiii:-'-~- ,,-
ANSWERlIOOKS , ,..,
IWIGIS MANfACTURERS.~i':'~ . ' , A MANUFACTURERS
DIRECTORY 1983 'I ,.IIIftIER 1984 ',"" .4&1tft1
, 20.000 flrm. ' 80.000 .xecutlYft , 180 billion,' 5. 1Irms' 10}OOO executlVn' $27 billion In-.
Industrial market . 840, ,_. Clpatlt\tt......:...1,~. '. dult 1\ market I. 490 munlolpalltln '. 230 pag..'
paa" . Ave~1I 800 IlIW .rm.1ICh year I Et-, Ave an 300 new firms eacll .yRr , HardbOund,
tabllshed 1912. Hardbouiid, enarMI papef... 8'h"l(,8V.",x 11" I Published ,nnualrv.' Fetj>>ret: Mln-
11" . Published annuallY " Ffaturts:"h!CaOO 'ilea lis ',525 ~t8ntS' st. Piur:818 tmlnts: Hop-
,~OOO 'p.llnts; Rockford 81,4. plant.; Elk Grove klns I plantsJ Edsn ~ralrlt 73 plants; Duluth 63 I
Vlllage/598 plants: Addison '~plant~: Fran~"n pia : St. Cloud 5~ plants; ~lnonl5hlartts I
Park 165 plants ' . 1.... ". . . " . " .. " " . ..III, _143
,.... ... "1,;......" ~ .. Ino.... po. ",
INDIANA MANUtACTUJERI. ", ," 'SO' E 1985 INDUSTRIAL . ,',
~~~~~~~~.12~8o~ 'xec!jtIV~ '$59':Mo~~ SO RCEBOOKS ALREADY IN STOCK:
dustrlal market. 521 municipalities I 504 pag..'" CHICAGO GEOGRAPHIC MFRt. DIR. . 80
Averages 500 new firms each year: · HardbOund;, IUItlftIS SERVICES DIRECTORY 109
8V.:' x 11" . Published annually' features: In- ,"v
dlanapolls 1,311 plants: Elkhart 534 plallh' Fort 1 FLORIDA INOU.,-RIES DJREtTORY 55
Wayne 385 plant~j Evansville 301plints; SOutil 1 KANSAS MFRS. DIRECTORY. 44
8end 291 plants; Muncie ~51 pl!lnta ' , '19 KENTUCKY MFRS. REOISTEII., 40
1113 MItIaI ... .. . . , . . . . . . . . . ... 171. lOW 7,9 MASSACHUSms OIR. OF MFRS.
ma 0 ers to',' Y .
INDUSTRIAL BOOKSTORE-I' MISSOURI DIRECTORY OfMFB. 80 I
4 EAST HURON STREET ' 1 OHIO MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY 90
I" 'CHICAGO,IL8081fl, '. 1 I WISCO_MFRS. RE8~R 71
i,;'.__."_~ (312) 337.1084 to charge orders on Ma erCard, Visa or Aroerl~a~~"18
:i'~'I'~~.-..'.'.
., "
I .
~.I'."."."-.'.'.'..'..'.'.'...
" ",
I,
" .,
.:"; i"'
ii-~
,
\
\
::,.~
.f4:
;....
'f1'
'~,
1>17~:
-':"":.:',
);..,;
.. I:}.'.'"
'-: :,,;:.l~_.,~~~. ,; "7';; ~ .
'1"';',.
.. ,
~'" "1,':,
. '
~ .' ."
- ,..''''
~~ ",.. '"..
.... ;;,~..
'it'- .
'.(~~" ,
- ~- ~ .;- ~
. .' ..
!
;i~";L"
....~,....i'!'"^,,;~
@