IDC Agenda 04-19-1984
.
AGEN
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVE
Thursday, April 19,
Monticello
Members:
J. Bondhus, T. Eidem,
S. Johnson, D. Lungwi
D. Smith, G. Wieber,
1. Call to Order.
COMMITTEE MEETING
A.M.
B. Gagnelius, A. Grimsmo, R. Hoglund,
z, J. Morrell, W. Musty, B. Schrupp,
nd A. pelvit.
2. Approval of the Minutes of he Meeting Held March 15, 1984.
Old Business
3. Ticket Assignment and Sales.
4. Montage of Minnesota for Pr sentation to Mark Dayton.
5. Report from Promotional Sub ommittee Special Meeting to be
Held on April 18, 1984.
.
New Business
6. Consideration of New Indust ial Development Committee Member
Representing NSP.
7. Director of Economic
8. Prospect Update.
9. other Business.
10. Adjournment.
.
.
MINU
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL D
Thursday, March 15,
Monticello
S
VELOPMENT COMMITTEE
1984 - 7:00 A.M.
i ty Hall
Members Present: T. Eidem, J. B ndhus, R. Hoglund, S. JOhnson,
D. Lungwi tz, G Wieber, and A. Pelvit.
Members Absent: A. Grimsmo, B. Gagnelius, J. Morrell, D. Smith,
B. Schrupp, an W. Musty.
Gary Wieber Chaired the meeting,
G. Wieber opened the meeting, as
1984, minutes. Motion to approv
was made by D. Lungwitz and seco
3. Printin of Tickets for Ma 31
Because B. Schrupp was on vacati
before this meeting, G. Wieber s
Schrupp to prepare information
tickets to Key Tool & Plastics
be beneficial).
.
s Jay Morrell was out of town.
ing for approval of the February
the February 16, 1984, minutes
ded by T. Eidem.
16,
984, Ban uet.
n and returned just the day
ggested A. Pelvit contact B.
banquet tickets, (complimentary
d whoever A. Pelvit feels might
4. Confirmation of Guest S eaker at Ban uet.
G. Wieber suggested this
in order to discuss more
5. Consideration of Pro ram
is self explanatory and be bypassed
business.
B. Gagnelius was on vacation. erefore, some of the details
concerning seating, table arrang ments, and acoustics, etc.,
could not be verified. G. Wiebe explained about the guitar
player that performed at the Rot ry meeting. S. Johnson felt the
music was a little loud. D. Lun itz explained the "canned music"
they had at the Bank's Christmas Party. He stated that it was set
at a very low level so that conv rsation was easy. G. Wieber
explained that the live music wo ld cost $150-$200. It was the
committee's consensus to cut cos s and use the "canned music".
G. Wieber will contact B. Gagnelius on this matter.
Last year there seemed to with the open bar after the
dinner. G. Wieber asked the c ittee for discussion regarding
drinks. T. Eidem expressed his feelings of an open bar for one
hour before dinner and somehow controlling the drinks after dinner.
He suggested a dinner drinks ti ket for after-dinner drinks.
.
- 1 -
.
IDC Minutes - 3/15/84
D. Lungwitz suggested having the waitresses take drink orders after
dinner at the tables. After the speech there could be a cash bar.
It was the committee's consensus to have one hour open bar during the
social hour, one complimentary after-dinner drink, and then a cash
bar following Dayton's speech.
D. Lungwitz asked if
because B. Gagnelius
contact him on this. D. Lungwit
Party setup and suggested having
level.
the new part reserved. Again,
ion, G. Wieber said he would
explained the Bank's Christmas
the head table on the main (bar)
6. Consideration
IDC Members.
G. Wieber asked the committee if
corrections to the ticket list.
personally knowing an individual
added to his list. D. Lungwitz
G. Wieber explained why A. Pelvi
He further explained that A. Pel
possible businesses and individu
.
G. Wieber suggested that A. Pelv't
every person and personally foIl
personal visit. He also suggest
letter. T. Eidem explained that
tickets in and it worked fairly
should be more subtle and not ha
consensus of the committee to ha
then have each member use their
handle the tickets. Most member
personally. T. Eidem stated tha
will be approached for ticket sa
keeping up with new businesses i
committee that every business an
contacted.
G. Wieber suggested having a ti
Four weeks (April 16, 1984) prio
consensus for sending out the Ie
there were any additions or
J. Bondhus commented on not
to contact at two businesses
ffered to take Ben Franklin.
's name didn't appear on the list.
would be contacting all other
in and around Monticello.
might send general letters to
up with telephone contact or a
d not enclosing the tickets with the
last year the letter was sent with
ell. G. Wieber felt the mailing
e tickets enclosed. It was the
e letters sent to everyone and
iscretion as to how they want to
present wanted to handout tickets
the successful cable T.V. company
es. D. Lungwitz asked if we were
town. A. Pelvit assured the
possible individual will be
ly mailing of invitational letters.
to the banquet was the committee's
ters.
7. Consideration of Momento (Person lized Gift) for Those Attendin
Banquet.
G. Wieber explained the problem ssociated with putting together a
care package for guests of the C'ty. He stated that businesses such
as Bondhus Corporation, Wrightco, and Jones Manufacturing could give
a gift. But what would firms Ii e NSP, lXI, or Larson Manufacturing
give? G. Wieber also stated the possibility that a person with
.
- 2 -
.
.
Dayton's background may not even
as a public official, stated tha
he may accept as a gift. G. Wie
montage in City Hall as a gift.
should not compete with any othe
something that is unique. He ex
shaped like Wright County and ha
Lungwitz suggested contacting Mr
montage in the shape of Minnesot
cello could somehow be shown and
a plate attached explaining who
what occasion, and to whom it wa
It was the committee's consensus
gifts until a later date (e.g.,
and pursue the montage. D. Lun
cost.
8. Brochure Progress.
G. Wieber stated that A. Pelvit
of the Industrial Brochure. He
should not be dated in any way
I C Minutes - 3/15/84
like this type of gift. S. JOhnson,
Dayton may be limited as to what
er suggested something like the
D. Lungwitz stated that a gift
business in town. It should be
lained how Lynn Smith made a montage
it displayed in the Bank. D.
Smith to see if he could make a
It would also be nice if Monti-
the montage explained (e.g., have
ade it, who presented it, for
presented) .
to discourage the idea of personalized
ndustry Appreciation Day in September) ,
itz will check with Mr. Smith on the
as put a lot of work into the text
urther stated that all information
.g., names, dates, etc.).
10.
Consideration of Attendin the T ade Show S onsored b the Minnea olis
Chamber of Commerce.
A. Pelvit gave results of the Mi
Trade Show on February 22-23, 19
such as Maple Grove and Thief Ri
Eidem moved to attend this trade
seconded by S. JOhnson, passed
will have a booth at this show a
nesota Small Business Market place
4. A. Pelvit stated that cities
er Falls will be attending. T.
show (May 22-23, 1984). It was
animously. Bondhus Corporation
so.
9. Presentation b Monticello's Pub ic Works Director.
.
John Simola, Monticello's Public
facts on the current Wastewater
future capabilities. He explain
mid-1970's and was planned to ha
into the 1990' s.
He stated that at first Wrightco
and at present have brought NSP
ordinance pertaining to industri
Permits are issued to qualified
with a five-year life. After fi
situation for future use.
Works Director, briefly gave
reatment plant (WWTP) and its
d that the process began in the
dle Monticello and its users well
was the only major industrial user
n line. He further stated that an
1 users of the WWTP was enacted.
sers. They are certified each year
e years the City will evaluate the
- 3 -
.
Mr. Simola went on to say that i
and the WWTP was near planned ca
even residential developments
within guidelines.
Mr. Simola's intentions were to
information regarding any possib
or expanded WWTP be needed becau
J. Bondhus didn't like the City
He felt that additional taxes an
adequate to help build a new or
T. Eidem explained the City's vi
flexible plan. The City's fear
relocation of a new industrial u
obsolete. This is only meant to
Mr. Simola added that because fe
project, some strings were attac
certain levels and standards. I
be free of those guidelines and
within these guidelines will mak
future.
I C Minutes - 3/15/84
a new wet industry carne on line
acity, then residential users or
ht be stifled in order to stay
ive committee members adequate
e adverse feelings should a new
e of a new wet industry.
ortraying this as a negative.
sewer rates, etc., would be
xpanded WWTP.
wpoint as trying to present a
s that overnight expansion or
er could make our current WWTP
be planned strategy.
eral monies were used in this
ed that the City has to maintain
approximately 2-5 years, we will
ill have greater freedom. Staying
it easier to obtain funds in the
.
G. Wieber suggested having J. Si ola, J. Bondhus, T. Eidem,
J. Bada1ich (OSM), A. Grirnsmo, d himself meet before the Council
meeting on March 26, 1984, to discuss this further. Those
interested in this consented.
There being no further business, G. Wieber asked for a motion to
adjourn. Motion by T. Eidem, seconded by all. Meeting adjourned.
~~~:~
Allen L. Pelvit
Director of Economic Development
.
IDC Agenda - 4/19/84
.
3. Ticket Assignment and Sales. (A P.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the March 15, 1984, meeting,
member of the Committee. They
and distributed. Upon confirma
speaker, B. Schrupp had tickets
names were assigned to each
ere enclosed with the agenda
ion of Mark Dayton as guest
printed.
A Chamber letter has been prepa ed by members of the Promotional
Subcommittee for mailing to prospective banquet attendees. This
letter will bring their attenti to our annual fund raiser
banquet and the advantages to th m for attending.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Upon receiving your tickets nd assignment, please wait a
few days to begin contacting individuals. This will allow
the letter to be received an read.
.
2. Upon receiving your list of ames and tickets, you will also
receive a letter and envelop. They will be pre-addressed
and stamped. You mail the 1 tter and in approximately three
days you can begin contactin individuals.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Because some Committee members a signments are not located in
Monticello, mailing tickets may e both practical and convenient.
It is recommended that each of y u use your discretion in handling
the ticket sales. The letter will be written to allow for both
mailing tickets and personal sales.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
List of Committee members and nam s are included in the agenda/
supplement for the March 15, 1984 meeting.
.
- 1
IDC Agenda 4/19/84
.
4. Monta e of Minnesota for Presenta ion to Mark Da ton. (A.P.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At our last meeting it was the co
have some type of gift that would
or industries in the City. It wa.
that the gift would not be consi
to accept. It was suggested to 1
Minnesota, and Mr. L. Smith was t
this project at this time. Mr. S
montage for this particular purpo
sensus of the Committee to
not conflict with other businesses
also the Committee's concern
red improper for a public figure
ok into a montage shaped like
be asked if he would work on
ith has consented to making a
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Mr. Smith could
banquet ticket.
ge and charge the Industrial
The Industrial Development
h full price for his banquet
1.
Have Lynn Smith make the mont
Development Committee a fee.
Committee would charge L. Smi
ticket (s) .
2.
in return for a complimentary
C. RECOMMENDATION:
.
If Mr. Smith is agreeable, I reea end that he make a montage
in the likeness of Minnesota in r turn for a banquet ticket.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None needed.
.
- 2 -'
.
.
.
5. Re ort from promotional Subcommi
on April 18,1984. (A.P.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Because Bruce Gagnelius was on v
several questions and final prep
banquet were postponed until Bru
in touch with B. Gagnelius and r
There is a separate agenda for t:
This agenda item is to inject th
Subcommittee's meeting.
IDC Agenda - 4/19/84
to be Held
cation for our March 15 meeting,
rations for the May 21, 1984,
e returned. G. Wieber has been
ceived answers to his questions.
e special subcommittee meeting.
outcome of the promotional
Items that will be discussed in lude the following:
- Ticket sales
_ Monte Club arrangemen s
_ Montage for speaker
_ Banquet program
_ Banquet publicity
committee advertising campaign
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
No action required at this time. No supporting data needed. G.
wieber will address Committee w'th report.
- 3 -
IDC Agenda - 4/19/84
.
6. Consideration of New Industrial Develo ment Committee Member
Representing NSP. (A.P.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you know, we have contacted
accept a position on the Indust
may also remember that because
Sherco III Plant and other comm
with our Committee.
.orm Ecklund in hopes he would
ial Development Commi ttee . You
f his activity with Becker's
ities, he was unable to participate
He did, however, suggest Harvey endell as a good possibility.
It was the consensus of the Com 'ttee to have A. Pelvit contact
Mr. Kendell and discuss this fur her.
Since the March 15 meeting, I ha e contacted Mr. Kendell in regard
to becoming a member of our Comm'ttee. He stated that he was
interested in discussing the Co ittee. I briefly explained the
purpose of the Committee, its me ers' responsibilities, and functions
performed.
.
Because our schedules have not c
time. However, we have schedule
meeting. I will report the resu
incided, we have not met a second
a meeting prior to the Committee
ts at the meeting.
No action or data required at th s time.
.
- 4 -
rl
r///'"
to 3-15-84 :
.
- Contacted Pederson's Unlimited, paynesville, to keep in touch. I
informed Mrs. Pederson that we wou d be UDAG eligible until August
31, 1984. Mrs. Pederson told me th t this is their slow period and
they are trying to introduce some new lines and ideas and they are
not ready to make any decisions. I ill keep in touch , maybe lining
up a tour with them and members of the conunittee.
- Contacted Lauren Martin of Business
olis. He doesn't want to give out i
but with a little investigative wo
the names of some interested owners.
introducing Monticello and myself.
I have talked to Vince Erickson
Plant. Initially it was to be a
to complete several operations. Now
operation and expand as the idea an,
baaking is supposedly from investor
seen nor heard from them. This does
near future. If it does, it might b
.
- I have touched base with all of the
information came out. They will not
word that they might expand and/or
or the 1PB thing is cleared up.
- Dale Gustafson of Metro Warehouse.
locating in Monticello. He
in our lower taxes. I will
definite plans on when the
road.
- The Lasma Corporation from Scottsda
My source was wrong or gave me the
track it down and get back to Jim B
Marketing Specialists of Minneap-
formation on his business clients,
and cross checking I have found
I will fell them out with letters
egard to his Artichoke Processing
e seale operation with the potential
the plan is to pursue a much smaller
demand calls for. The financial
in Florida; however I haven't
't sound like it will happen in the
with Jim Boyle's property.
old prospects and found the same
give any decisions or definate
elocate until interest rates decline
I me t with him in regard to re-
ring a move. He is also interested
g with him after he finds out more
ts his property vacated for a new
e, Arizona was not a bona fide lead.
rong information. I will try to
yle.
- I will be in touch with a represent tive from Data Forms after they are
finished with their taxes and audit
- Larry Hagedon - I contacted him in
He told me he had financing lined u
a businness plan. I am not pursuing
had adverse conunents about his repu
do all the work.
egard to his woodworking project.
with a backer and was working on
this to much because other people
ation. I am letting Mr. Hagedon
- I have worked at various times on t e Supply Room/Economic Development
Office.
.
- I have worked heavily on the UDAG p
completed an Enviromental Assessmen
of No Significant Effect on the Env
of Funds (RROF) in the Monticello T
Request for Release of Ftmds off t
review and public comment for 15 da
oject for FSI. To this point I have
Worksheet and filed notice of Finding
romcnt (FONSI) and Request for Release
meso On the 15th of March I sent a
HUD in Minneapolis. They keep it for
s and then initiate our Line of Credit.
~
'""
Things to be accomplished for the period of 3-15-84 to 4-1-84
- Binish work on the Supply Room/Economic Development Office. Will work
off and on with Gary and Torn installing Door and wall partition, etc.
.
- Proceed with the UDAG project. There are forms neede d that verify
project manager, authorized person to draw down on the letter of credit,
and designation of depositiory cards that will be forwrded to there proper
places.
There were several manuals to become familiar with ~n regard to the
ground rules and UDAG accountability.
- Prepare Agenda/Supplements for the Industrial Development Meeting, pre-
pare minutes for the meeting.
- Attend a Luncheon Meeting wi th Mark Dayton for the Star Cities.
- Attend Chamber Meeting and prepare notes.
- Prepare and attend a special HRA meeting on the 19th. Then prepare notes.
- Prepare HRA Agenda/Supplement for Aprils regular meeting.
- Go to the Salvage Building to get Desks. Help prepare them for offices.
- Because of lot of requests for information on Resorts and camping I 4It
will be compiling a list of Resorts and Campgrounds in the Monticello
area. I will also be putting a list of Motel~ in the area together as well.
After the list completion I will contacting the owners by mail and requesting
that they send brochures etc, for the Chambers handing out.
Allen Pe1vit's hours worked
3-5-84
3-12-84
to
to
3-9-84
3-16-84
45 hours
42
lIRA mtg.
4It
(j)
THINGS ACCOMPLISHED FROM 3-15-84 to 4-1-84
.
...........,.._.,"-"".....1
-Copmpleted work on the wall partition and do r assembly for the Supply Room /
Economic Development Office. Remaining work 'ncludes preparing and painting desks,
rearranging the file cabinets in the Supply oom and hanging wallpaper in my office.
-Have completed all correspondence and forms
Inc. UDAG. Will be scheduling a joint meetin
bankers and city staff. The purpose being an
all parties involved. The letter of credit s
us to dra',Il down on UDAG funds .Have recieved
other information sent by HUD.
eeded by HUD for Fulfillment Systems,
with HUD, the developer, the contractor,
understanding of the groundrules for
ould be approved soon and would entitle
d become familiar with manuals and
-Prepared Industrial Development Committee Ag nda/Supplement and attend meeting on
3-15-84. Prepare minutes for meeting.
-Attended and Prepared minutes for the 3-15-8 Chamber meeting.
-Attended the 3-19-84 City Council meeting.
-The luncheon meeting with Mark Dayton was po tponed until April 2, 1984.
- Prepared Agenda/Supplement for spaecial HRA meet1ng on 3-19-84 and prepared notes.
-Have compiled a listing a several resorts an campgrounds in and around the Monticello
area. This being the beginning of the summer vacation/camping season, I decided to
have information readily available when some e inquired about it. This would save
time when answering informational letters for the Chamber. Now I can send a list of
all resorts/campgrounds and brochures along w.th a form letter. I have also put
together a list of several motels in the Mont. cello area. Because of the NSP work
there is a demand for motels. Now I have the . nformation readily available.
.
THINGS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED FOR THE PERIOD OF 4- 1-84 to 4-15-84
/-Attend the luncheon meeting with Mark Dayton staff.
v'-Prepare Agenda/Supplement for the 4-4-84 HRA eeting and prepare minutes.
t/-Finish work on desks and spraypaint. Transfer to City Hall. Transfer my amterials
to the new office.
~-Contact the Minnesota Trade Office in regard 0 Scandinavian Trnasport Products (STP)
getting information and initiating contact wi h them.
~- Make sure that my information for the Compre ensive Plan is complete and ready for
meeting.
-Check on appraisals for land in question rega
arrange meetings with John Simola and land ow
possible fire barn sites.Try and
~-Complete any UDAG forms and aggreements that to be executed.
~-Keep in contact with as many prospects as pos ible without irritating them.
~-Larry Hagedon - His project is proceeding nic
backing. The project is in the neighborhood 0
plan and type of equipment needed to operate t
type of special management help he will need.
thr?uqh a l.ot of WOl'::Js tilJ!!: ?nn eff(')l~+ p+r<
ly. He claims to have some type financial
$1.5 million. He is working on the business
e plant. He is also trying to determine wh~~
this is a farse, he certainly has gone . ,~,~':~i)
\~""'..~~,..
Allen pelvit's Hours worked
3-19-84 to 3-23-84
3-26-84 to 3-30-84
46 hours
42 hours
(j)
1:-
.
HRA meeting
.
.
.
8. Prospect Update. (A.P.)
IDe Agenda - 4/19/84
Inc., (FSI): Last week I spoke with Jack
Peach and FSI wanted to wai t to see how the Industrial Revenue
Bond (IRB) legislation was prog essing before beginning construction.
They were willing to sit tight til September before beginning
construction. This date was ch sen because the U.D.A.G. has a
deadline of December 31, 1984. ;The project must be completed
before that date.
After discussing this with T. E~dem, we decided to have a meeting
with FSI and present a proposal for construction on July 1, 1984.
The staff checked into "dual" or "clouded" bond opinions for IRB' s.
In short, if present legislation passes and it is retroactive to
January 1, the bands become ta ble. If it passes effective the
day the bill is passed, then the could be tax exempt. In either
case, FSI could act on their pIa to begin construction.
FSI liked
April 24.
Financing
this proposal and will commit to the contractors on
This is the date that bonds for the Tax Increment
will have been awarded
'.
Scandinavian Trans ortation Prod
A. Grimsmo and myself read an ar
about a Norwegian firm that prod
blade. They tested the Norwegi
Department this winter. They wo
cts (STP): In January, 1984,
icle in the Minneapolis Tribune
ced a snowplow with a retractable
plows with the Minnesota Highway
ked very well.
Arve asked me if I would check to this, if for no other reason
than he would be glad to speak" orsk" with them.
I did check into it, and through Governor Perpich's Minnesota Trade
Office I received a letter and telephone call that the Scandinavian
Transportation Products (STP) group was interested in Minnesota for
a project and Monticello was in e running.
The following is a brief descript" on of STP and what they are proposing:
STP is a consorti urn of 2-3 Norweg' an businesses that formed a new
manufacturing business. They wou d like to establish an assistance
center on International Clearingh use in Minnesota. Selected Norwegian
firms would rent/lease production office facilities from us. These
firms would remain in the center til they reach their break even
point or some other type of progr ss is obtained. At that point the
test companies must choose to reI cate in their own building so that
another firm may start up. TIley ay remain in the same city, relocate
in another city, or even to anoth r state. They may decide to return
to Norway if the business isn't s ccessful.
'.
- 6 -
'l,' 'ILII,,'
,Ii
! i.1
-
I
.
I
.~
,
a
;!:'''::
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
TECHNICA APPENDIX B
THE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WASTEWATER PR TREATMENT PROGRAM
DESIGN IMITATIONS
The Cit of Monticello Wastewater Treat
struct! n completed in 1983. The 20 ye
ttieCit to progress as shown in the fo
were deigned to accomodate a relativel
industrial waste as compared to the amo
ent Plant was designed in 1980 with con-
r design life anticipated growth within
lowing table. The treatment facilities
high percentage of high organic strength
nt of domestic type wastes present.
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LOADING
TOTAL DESIGN LO DING
YEAR
POPULATION
FLOW
(GAL/DAY)
~5
U/DA
TSS
U /DA Y
FLOW.
(GAL/DAY)
~5. T5S.
n /DA Y If/DA Y
1980 3,050 490,000 3,09 1,369 80,000 2,335 667
1985 3,700 570,000 3,37 1,551 84,000 2,452 700
1990 4,500 650,000 3,75 1,785 90,000 2,627 750
1995 5,300 770,000 5,16 2,659 11 5 , 000 3,836 1,440
2000 6,400 910,000 6,27 3,224 140,000 4,671 1,752
. The Industrial Design Loading thr ughout the design 1 He of the facility
have been established at approxim tely 15%, 74% and 54% of the total Design
I
Lo~ding respectively, for the Flo , BODS and TS5.
3279
Append Lx B-1
.,..'_'..__. I;
. .If\',~: L
It is su~gested that the current combin d industrial loading to the treatment
facilities be limited to these percenta es, especially in the biological oxygen
demand (BODS and the total suspended so ids (T58) catagories. These design
percentages are already quite high and, although the treatment plant has been
designed to handle the loading, exceedi these limits may well jeopardize the
effluent I quality of the plant.
The treatment plant is not designed to pecifically remove any pollutants other
than BODS, TSS and fecal coliform. The original discharge limitations estab-
lished by the state and federal agencie inlcuded BODS' T5S, fecal coliform, pH
and dissolved oxygen. Because of the limited treatment capabilities or because of
nuisances, damage, injury, toxicity, et ., there are many substances which must be
prohibft~ from the sewer system. The ollowing list is a sampling of such
prohib1t~d -substances. All existing or proposed industrial users discharging to
the 8ewe~ system shall receive' written uthorlzation for this discharge from the
Directoriof Public Works and submit inf rmation on the wastes and by-products
contain~ in their discharges.
---
1.
3.
.
PARTIAL LISTING OF PROHI ITED DISCHARGES
Any liquids, solids or gases which by re
or may be, sufficient either alone or by
cause fire or explosion or be injurious
disposal system or to the operation of t
cessive readings on an explosion hazard
the system or at any point in the system.
any single reading over ten percent (10%
of the meter. Prohibited materials inclu
kerosene, naphtha, benzene, toluene, xyl
hydes, peroxides, chlorates, perchlorate
sulfides.
2.
Solid or viscous substances which will i
to the flow in a sewer or other interfer
wastewater treatment facilities such as,
with particles greater than one half inc
guts or tissues, paunch manure, bones, h
whole blood, feathers, egg shells, ashes
marble dust, metal, glass, straw, shavin
grains, spent hops, waste paper, wood, p
residues from refining or processing of
grinding or polishing wastes.
son of their nature or quantity are,
interaction with other substances to
n any other way to the wastewater
e system. At no time, shall two suc-
eter, at the point of discharge into
be more than five percent (5%) nor
of the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL)
e, but are not limited to, gasoline,
ne, ethers, alcohols, ketones, alde-
, bromates, carbides, hydrides and
sufficient amount cause obstruction
nce with the operation of the
but not limited to, grease, garbage
(1/2") in any dimension, animal
ir, hides or fleshings, entrails,
cinders, sand, spent lime, stone or
s, grass clippings, rags, spent
astic, gas tar, asphalt residues,
uel or lubricating oil, mud or glass
Any wastewater having a property capable of causing damage or hazard to
structures, equipment, and personnel of he wastewater disposal system,
including any wastewater having a pH les than 5.0 or greater than 10.0.
8.
Any wastewater having a temperature grea
individually or in combination with othe
wastewater treatment plant to have a tern
4.
Any wastewater containing toxic pollutan
singly or by interaction with other poll
wastewater treatment process, constitute
create a toxic effect in the receiving w
system. A toxic pollutant shall include
identified pursuant to Section 307 (a) 0
s in sufficient quantity, either
tants, to inhibit or disrupt any
a hazard to humans or animals, or
ters of the wastewater dispoal
but not be limited to any pollutant
the Act.
5. Any noxious or malodorous liquids, gases, or solids which either singly or by
interaction with other wastes are capabl of creating a public nuisance or
hazard to life or are sufficient to prev nt entry into the sewers for their
maintenance and repair.
6. Any wastewater with objectionable color ot removed in treatment process,
such as but not limited to, dye wastes a d vegetable tanning solutions.
7. Any wastewater which creates conditions t or near the wastewater disposal
system-which violate any statute or any ul~, regulation or ordinance of any
public ag~ncy or state or federal regula ory body.
-.
3279
er than 1500F (65.60C), or causing,
wastewater, the influent at the
erature exceeding 1040F (400C).
Appendix B-2
\1~~~~~~~~!.,._',~~;::i!~~~:~f":,~~f;i(.t'::.::::"':'.~I.~',,, ~I':I7I;!Ol";:':)"I,!':'~;"'';'':::''':_ :.~-_~"~:<!':'::~'~"',',~'~"~;";'W"'"
;;'.;~J<I'!I""'~"'.'II""".\"I"",'
--.
.
f.
- .-
Any slug load. which shall mean any po lutant. including oxygen demanding
pollutants (BOD. etc.), released in a ischarge of such volume or strength as
to cause inhibition or disruption in t e wastewater disposal system. In no
case shall a slug load have a flow rat
ties of pollutants that exceed for any
minute. more than five (5) times the a
tione. quantities, or flow of the user
or contain concentrations or quanti-
time period longer than fifteen (IS)
erage twenty-four (24) hour concentra-
during normal operation.
10.
atorm or groundwater.
Non-contact cooling water or unpollute
11.
Any wastewater containing fats, wax, g
not, in excess of 150 mg/l or contain!
become viscous at temperatureS between
any wastewater contanlng 011 and greas
greater than 100 mg/l whether emulsifi
ease, or oils, whether emulsified or
g substances which may solidify or
320F and 1500F (OOe and 65.6oe); and
concentrations of mineral origin of
d or not.
12. Wastewater containing inert suspended olids (such 8S, but not limited to,
Fullers earth, lime slurries, and lime residues) or of dissolved solids (such
as, but not limited to, soldium aulfat ) in such quantities that they would
cause disruption with the wastewater disposal system.
13. Organic solvents at any detectable lev
14. Any discharge wastewater containing in excess of:
1.0 mg/l arsenic
1.0 mg/l cadmium
1.0 mg/l copper
1.0 mg/l cyanide
2.0 mgll lead
O.s mg/l mercury
0.5 mg/l nickel
2.0 mg/l total chromium
1.0 mg/l zinc
10.0 mg/l phenolic compounds which cann t be removed by the City's wastewater
treatment processes.
DOMESTIC.
For informational purposes the present loadi g to the treatment plant are estima-
ted to be as follows:
I
TOTAL
Flow. Gal/Day
BODS' I/08y
TSS, I lDay ~.:,
.
3279
-"'-
* Includes Commercial users
Appendix B-3
WASTEWATER TREATMENT P T LOADING INFORMATION
-...
Domestic Indu trial % Total
Flow, Gal/Day 354,221 55 779 13.6 410,000
BODS, # /Day 1,257 799 38.9 2,056
TSS, # /Day 657 265 28.7 922
LAST 1983
Flow, Gal/Day 342,240 14.7 401,000
BODS' # /Day 728 58.1 1,738
TSS, # /Oay 345 50.1 692
1983 DESIGN ROJECTION
Flow, Gal/Day 455,600 82, 15.3 538,000
BODS, # /Day 860 2, 73.7 3,265
TSS, # /Day 791 46.5 1,478
1983 DESIGN
Flow, Gal/Day ------- 10.4 538,000
. BODS, # /Day ------- 24.5 3,265
TSS, # /Day ------- 17.9 1,478
1988 PROJECTION ( r) BASED ON
NO INCREASE IN NU IND. USERS
Est. 4,180
Flow, Gal/Day 530,400 15.5 627,800
BODS, # /Day 1,045 62.6 2,795
TSS, # /Day 961 38.4 1,561
Recommended approximate maximum industr"al design loading throughout
design life:; 15% Flow, 74% BODS, and 5 % TSS.
.
-- "_.~ ,.- ,,,- ...- ,,,--_. ...--