Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 06-24-2019AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 24, 2019 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Academy Room 5:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. 2020 Budget Preview 5:30 p.m. Concept Stage PUD —156 unit residential apartment complex with the potential for commercial development Applicant: Dale Bucholz Construction (with Planning Commission) Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes from June 10, 2019 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • 4"' of July Business Hours • Upcoming Stormwater Utility Fee • MontiArts Update F. Council Liaison Updates • Library Board • EDA • MOAA • I-94 Coalition G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • Construction Update • Communications & Special Projects Coordinator Update 2. Consent Agenda — All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-42 accepting donations of $250 from TDS Telecom and $400 from Community United Methodist Church for Fire Department Wildland Gear, a donation of plants (value of $187) from EB Gardens for Parks Department, a donation of $450 from All 4 Kids for Power of Produce Kids Club and Color Me Fall event, and a donation of $1,500 from Wright County Area United Way for Power of Produce Kids Club E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-45 accepting a grant from Central Minnesota Arts Board in the amount of $9,400 for public art F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction with Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello on Saturday, July 13, 2019. Applicant: Chamber of Commerce G. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of West Bridge Park, city streets and related assistance for the Party in the Park on Wednesday, July 10, 2019. Applicant: Monticello Chamber H. Consideration of approving an application for temporary on -sale liquor license for the VFW Post 8731 for Monticello Chamber of Commerce Party in the Park event on July 10, 2019 I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-43 approving the issuance of general obligation bonds, series 2019A J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-44 accepting a $162,550.57 Deputy Registrar Reimbursement Grant from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and authorize execution of the grant agreement and liability release K. Consideration of approving an electronic funds transfer policy L. Consideration of approving an accounts receivable write-off policy M. Consideration of approving an amended purchasing policy N. Consideration of approving the renewal of the agreement with Allina Health for training and certification for Monticello Fire Department first responders and emergency medical technicians O. Consideration of approving the purchase of a $47,319 back-up generator for the new fire station from Ziegler Power Systems, rescinding the original purchase of $37,874, and adding $9,445 for a larger switch P. Consideration of approving contract with Xcel Energy to provide power to the transformer for the new fire station at an amount of $11,353 Q. Consideration of approving a simple subdivision of an existing parcel and concurrent administrative lot combination in an adjustment to an existing lot line. Applicant: SPO LLC R. Consideration of accepting quotes and awarding contract for the 2019 Street Lighting Painting project to Pole Painting Plus of Maple Lake, MN in the amount of $14,280 S. Consideration of accepting quote and awarding contract for the 2019 Street Pavement Marking project to AAA Striping for an estimated cost of $45,353 T. Consideration of approving a final scope and contract with the Lakota Group/WSB for the Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for a 92 unit Multi- family/Assisted Living Facility in the R-4 (Medium -High Density Residence) District. Applicant: Monticello Senior Housing Owner, LLC — Michael Hoagberg 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 24, 2019 — 5:00 p.m. Academy Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. 5:00 p.m. 2020 Budget Preview 3. 5:30 p.m. Concept State PUD — 156 unit residential apartment complex with the potential for commercial development. Applicant: Dale Bucholz Construction (with Planning Commission) 4. Adjournment NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC, 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Angela Schumann Mayor Stumpf and Monticello City Council Monticello Planning Commission FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: June 19, 2019 RE: Monticello — PRG (Buchholtz) Multi Family Project— Concept PUD Review NAC FILE NO: 191.07 — 19.10 PLANNING CASE NO: PROPERTY ID: 155-500-142104 Application and Proiect Description. This memorandum reviews the elements of a proposed concept plan for a Planned Unit Development on the parcel bound by Chelsea Road to the north, Edmonson Road to the east, Cedar Street to the west and primarily vacant land to the south. The parcel is approximately eighteen and a half acres in size. It gains access to future development on the property via all three of the bordering streets. The concept project consists of a series of multiple family buildings in the south and east portion of the property, on about 8.5 total acres. The property abutting Chelsea Road and Cedar Street would be retained as commercial land for future development. The applicant shows a potential subdivision of those commercial lots reflecting access points that would be shared to minimize road connections. The proposal is made by Dale Buchholz Construction of Fargo, North Dakota. The property is currently zoned B-4 Regional Business District. However, the developers are asking for approximately 8.5 acres of the parcel to be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, utilizing the R-4, Medium -High Residence District as the baseline zoning for comparative purposes. The other 10.1 acres will remain to be developed under the existing zoning of B-4 Regional Business District. The housing portion of the project consists of three apartment buildings, each building holding 52 units, 156 units total. Each apartment complex will have a variety of one bedroom, two bedroom and three bedroom options. Detail on unit size was not provided at this level of review. The multi -family housing would have 134 uncovered parking spots, 9 of those handicap accessible, and 262 covered parking spots in a series of 17 detached garage buildings. For the residential 8.5 acres, a gross residential density of approximately 18.4 units per acre is shown. For the project to proceed, there are a series of City reviews or approvals: o PUD Concept Review (the subject of this report). The project requires a PUD as it proposes to develop a single parcel that will have three separate principal buildings, and certain aspects of site design may require flexibility; Further approvals would include the following: o Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment reguiding the proposed residential parcel from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live"; o Preliminary and Final Plats incorporating the residential and commercial parcels, dedicating the appropriate right of way, and resubdividing the property for the proposed commercial and residential uses; o Rezoning to PUD utilizing the R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District for the proposed multi -family area; The current proposal is for a PUD Concept Plan review, which is not a formal zoning or land use application, but is intended to provide the applicant an opportunity to get City feedback on a potential development proposal prior to more formal zoning review and the extensive supporting materials that such reviews require. The Planning Commission and City Council will have the opportunity to review the project, ask questions of the proposer, and provide comment as to the issues and elements raised by the project. The neighboring property owners have been notified of the meeting, but it is not a formal public hearing. This memorandum provides an overview of the project and will serve as an outline for the discussion. No formal approval or denial is offered for a Concept Review. However, it is vital that Planning Commission and City Council members engage in a frank and open discussion of the project benefits and potential issues. The Concept Review process is most valuable when the applicants have the opportunity to understand how the City is likely to look at the project and the potential issues it presents. In this way, the subsequent land use and development details can be more finely tuned to address City policy elements. 2 PUD Concept Review Criteria. The Comprehensive Plan was recently amended to consider the reguiding and rezoning of certain "non -prime" commercial areas for multiple family residential use. The first stage for this proposed project in that regard consists of an informal Concept Plan review which is separate from the formal PUD application which will follow the Concept Review step. The Ordinance identifies the purpose of Planned Unit Development as follows: (1) Purpose and Intent The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non- residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district. The City reserves the right to deny the PUD rezoning and direct the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable zoning district. PUD Concept reviews are to proceed as follows: (a) PUD Concept Proposal Prior to submitting formal development stage PUD, preliminary plat (as applicable) and rezoning applications for the proposed development, the applicant may, at its option, prepare an informal concept plan and present it to the Planning Commission and City Council at a concurrent work session, as scheduled by the Community Development Department. The purpose of the Concept Proposal is to: 1. Provide preliminary feedback on the concept plan in collaboration between the applicant, general public, Planning Commission, and City Council; 2. Provide a forum for public comment on the PUD prior to a requirement for extensive engineering and other plans. 3. Provide a forum to identify potential issues and benefits of the proposal which can be addressed at succeeding stages of PUD design and review. The intent of Concept Proposal review is to consider the general acceptability of the proposed land use, and identify potential issues that may guide the City's later consideration of a full PUD application. The City Council and Planning Commission meet in joint session to provide feedback to the developer, and may include an opportunity for informal public comment as they deem appropriate. 3 Staff Preliminary Comments and Issues. For this proposal, the primary considerations evident at this point in the process include the following elements: Land Use. As stated above, the proposed land use is currently zoned B-4 Regional Business District, and guided "Places to Shop" (Commercial). The applicants propose 8.5 acres of the parcel to be reguided to "Places to Live" a residential category that would support potential multiple family development. The Planning Commission and City Council should specifically address whether the area of the site proposed for multi -family is considered to be in a non -prime commercial area given its location away from the Chelsea and Cedar commercial district and its distance from TH25. As a non -prime location, this would suggest that the rezoning proposal could be accommodated. Council should refer to the highlighted portions of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan — Land Use (Exhibit G) as a reference on preferred siting factors for high density residential uses. As noted above, the other 10.1 acres of property will remain consistent with the existing zoning of B-4 Regional Business District. The commercial property will then be divided into as many as six individual lots of similar size. The proposal supports the retention of the commercial designation bordering existing commercial along Chelsea and Cedar. The applicants have identified the south and east portion of the property for the multiple family portion of the project. The primary roadway exposure is toward Chelsea and Cedar. Due to the size of the project, it is unlikely that the areas without exposure would attract significant commercial development. While the real estate market was significantly slowed during the last several years, commercial development continued, occurring almost exclusively in more highly exposed areas. The proposed multi -family site would therefore be a candidate for non-commercial uses. More specifically in regard to "Places to Live" and housing, the City of Monticello completed a 2017 Housing Study which identifies the number of multi -family units in Monticello and vacancy rates at the time of study. The study outlines goals relating to rental housing as a whole and the management of affordable housing supply within the rental market. Staff would encourage the review of this document as part of the consideration of this item. The Housing Study (page 26-27) also includes projections on unit demand for rental housing, with goals relating to both affordable and higher -end rental units identified. The report cites a need for approximately 64 additional rental units to bring vacancy rates into balance, and based on projected demographics, a demand for 217-243 rental households of varied type. Planning Commission and Council will note that the Rivertown Suites project 12 within the downtown will add 47 units to the current total of rental units, with 20% of those units required to meet affordability requirements under the TIF District. Additional multi -family unit development is also encouraged as redevelopment occurs within the downtown. If the Planning Commission and Council provide concept -level feedback that the use areas as proposed are supportable, staff would recommend re - guiding only that portion of the property proposed for multi -family to "Places to Live" Parkinq. Parking supply is shown at 396 parking spaces (2.53 spaces per unit), both covered and uncovered. The total supply is adequate and meets the zoning requirement of 2.25 spaces/du. The uncovered parking amount of 134 parking spaces also meets the zoning requirement of a maximum of 1.1 space/du. However, the proposed garage space does not meet the zoning standards. Monticello's garage code requirement in the R-4 District states that the base parking requirement must be met through attached or underground for multiple family projects. Detached accessory garages are allowed only after base requirements for underground or attached garages are met. The proposal only shows above ground detached parking garages. Elevations or renderings for the garages were not provided at the time of this report. iii. Building Heiqht and Architecture. The applicants have provided preliminary details relating to building design at this stage. Staff would note that the R-4 zoning district encourages certain specific elements related to roof line, building materials, and overall design. With regard to roofline, the R-4 code requires roofline articulation to avoid a single continuous ridgeline. Building materials should include a mixture of masonry and composition siding, rather than vinyl. In addition, PUD design is expected to exceed the basic district standards in exchange for the flexibility offered under the PUD process. iv. Site Planninq. A preliminary site plan is provided as a part of the PUD Concept plan. Staff notes that specific requirements for open space and extensive setback regulations apply in the R-4 District. If the applicants propose to vary from the base zoning standards, they should provide rationale that supports the variation, and note the additional amenities or elements of the site plan that balance the proposed flexibility. a. The zoning requirements for the setback standards need to be taken into consideration. The setback standards are as follows: i. 100 feet, front ii. 40 feet, corner side iii. 30 feet, interior side 461 iv. 40 feet, rear setback to building v. Clear open space from ROW - 60 feet vi. Clear open space from property line - 40 feet The site plan identifies a 100 -foot setback from the centerline of Edmonson. This measurement should instead be from the right of way line, which is likely to shift into the property as a part of the plat. As a result, it is likely that easterly building location would be required to be moved 60-70 feet farther west than the concept site plan. Other setbacks would also require verification at development stage and preliminary plat when paired with the recommendation of the City Engineer regarding rights of way dedication. Compliance with setbacks should be an issue for discussion. V. Open Space. To meet the zoning standards, the applicant must propose at least 500 square feet of common open space per dwelling unit. The applicant indicates that the proposed pervious (green) surface area of 37% would exceed this standard. However, a significant portion of this area is in small patches in an around the buildings, as well as a part of a ponding area along the north development boundary line. The high amount of impervious surface (driveways, parking, garages and principal buildings) appears to limit usable green space available to future residents of the project. a. Trails. The addition of trails on the property will require further review. Trail locations will be important internal to the project, as well as along the major roadways serving the project. b. Sidewalks. The applicant proposed a total sidewalk area of 1,812 square feet. These sidewalks are limited to the front of each building. c. Landscaping and Buffering. The project will be subject to a significant buffer requirement between the commercial and residential properties impacting all sides of the multi -family project, requiring specific additional setbacks and landscaping to screen and buffer the differing land uses. This requirement is likely to result in additional setback beyond that shown on the Concept plan. vi. Access and Circulation. Based on the site plan provided by the applicant, the multi -family apartment building would gain its access with an internal private road system extending from the both Edmonson on the east and through the commercial area to Cedar on the west. A third private access on the East side from Edmonson Avenue, about 200-300 feet south of the first private road would also give access to the apartment complex. The internal circulation winds among the various detached garages, and would be unclear to visitors, and raise issues of visibility at the garage building corners. A clearer internal circulation pattern could be beneficial. vii. The City Engineer makes the following additional notes relating to ongoing plan development: The City's transportation plan identifies a minimum 500 foot access spacing on collector roadways like Chelsea Road. The proposed access from Chelsea Rd meets this requirement. Applicant to complete a traffic study to estimate ADT, peak hour volumes, traffic distribution, etc. to determine potential access improvements and impacts the proposed project will have on adjacent roadways and to determine recommended improvements. The applicant shall plat at a minimum 50 feet of right of way along Edmonson Ave and Cedar Street from centerline and 65 feet of right of way along Chelsea Road from centerline. Additional right of way may be needed along these roadways and at the intersections of Chelsea Road and Cedar Street/Edmonson Ave depending on the findings from the traffic study. Consider extending an access to the southerly property to serve future development. The city's pathway guide map identifies a 10 -foot wide bituminous trail be constructed along the west side of Edmonson Ave. This trail will be required to be constructed with the proposed development. The applicant will be required to submit a stormwater management plan for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements in the City's Design Manual. Rate control, volume control, water quality and pretreatment measures will be required. The site is part of the TH 25 subwatershed and eventually outlets to the regional pond on the west side of TH 25. There is limited capacity in the storm sewer stubs along Cedar Street and Chelsea Road to accommodate runoff from the site. Additional stormwater information will be provided to the applicant before the project moves forward into design. Sanitary sewer and watermain services are available within the adjacent roadways to serve the site. The watermain should be looped within site. The site is within the low and moderate DWSMA vulnerability areas, however outside of the ERA, therefore infiltration is allowed. Proposed commercial uses and if they involve potential contaminants will be reviewed at the time of proposed development submittal in accordance with the City's wellhead protection plan. Summary. As noted, the Planning Commission and City Council provide comment and feedback to the developer at the Concept Review level. Again, the Concept Review process is most 7 valuable when the applicants have the opportunity to understand how the City is likely to look at the project and the potential issues it presents. City officials should identify any areas of concern that would require amendment to avoid the potential for eventual denial, as well as any elements of the concept that the City would find essential for eventual approval. Specific comment should address the following considerations: 1. Overall Land Use 2. Density 3. Setbacks 4. Building Design 5. Parking Supply, and the extent of the detached garages 6. Building Materials and Architecture 7. Landscaping, green space, setbacks, and other site plan improvements. 8. Circulation and Access 9. Street right of way 10. Internal private street design and circulation 11. Engineering comments and recommendations The notes listed above acknowledge that a significant amount of detail will be added as the project proceeds to a more advanced stage of review. Should the Planning Commission and Council desire additional research or information to aid in the concept feedback process for the applicant, the Planning Commission and Council have the option to table this item to a subsequent meeting. SUPPORTING DATA A. Aerial Site Image B. Applicant Narrative C. Supplemental Narrative D. Concept Lot Layout E. Concept Site Plan, 6-19-19 F. Concept Elevations G. Monticello Comprehensive Plan — Land Use chapter H. 2017 Monticello Housing Study Dale Buchholz Construction I Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Created by: City of Monticello Lengthy Legals - See City Hall I PID 155500142104 Specific PUD Concept Proposal A listing of contact information including name(s), address(es) and phone number(s) of: the owner of record, authorized agents or representatives, engineer, surveyor, and any other relevant associates. Owner of Record Premier Bank (Tom Kern) 301 Central Avenue, Osseo MN 55369 (612) 741-1862 tkern@premierbanks.com Prospective Buyer/ Developer Dale Buchholz Construction (Mark Buchholz) 4379 33rd Avenue South, Suite 121, Fargo, ND 58104 (701) 371-1646 mdbuchholz@.Rmail.com Rhet Architecture (Rhet Fiskness) 27 11th Street North, Fargo, ND 58102 (701) 388-2867 rhet@rhet-arch.com Property Resources Group (Brendan Muldoon, Realtor representing Prospective Buyer) 426545 th Street South, Suite 200, Fargo, ND 58104 (701) 318-2699 brendan@prgcommercial.com Commercial Realty Solutions (Wayne Elam, Realtor representing Owner of Record) 3 Highway 55 West, Buffalo, MN 55313-4320 (763) 682-2400 info@commercialrealtvsolutions.com 2. A listing of the following site data: Address, current zoning, parcel size in acres and square feet and current legal description(s). a. Property does not currently have a physical address. The parcel identification number as follows. i. 155500142104 ii. The property is bound by Chelsea Road to the North, Edmonson Road to the East, Cedar Street to the West, and parcels to the South (155500142300, 155230000010, and 155500142401) b. Zoning: B-4 Regional Business District c. Parcel Size: 18.6106 acres (810,678 SF) A narrative explaining the applicant's proposed objectives for the PUD, and public values that the applicant believes may be achieved by the project. The new construction will allow Monticello's tax base to grow and compete with neighboring cities by attracting new residents and retaining existing residents with a diversity of new housing types. This is accomplished using a PUD that establishes generous building setbacks, greenspace, and density criteria. The architectural design will feature a timeless quality using traditional materials and colors. The apartments will feature a variety of one, two, and three bedroom units with balconies for market rate rents. 4. A listing of general information including the number of proposed residential units, commercial and industrial land uses by category of use, public use areas including a description of proposed use, and any other land use proposed as part of the PUD. a. Proposed Number of Residential Units: 156 units- 369,998 SF (9.11 acres) b. 440,653 SF (10.11 acres) of commercial use to remain consistent with the existing zoning of B-4 Regional Business District c. Legal Description: Sect -14 Twp -121 Range -025 UNPLATTED LAND MONTICELL01 N1/2 OF NW1/4 LY S OF N586.37 FT OF SD N1/2 OF NW1/4 &LY ELY OF ELY LN OF OLD ST HWY 25 NKA CEDAR ST &LY WLY &SLY OF CTY RD 117 THAT WAS PRE - TAKEN FOR R/W BY STATE 5. Calculation of the proposed density of the project and the potential density under standard zoning regulations, including both gross density and net density, accounting for developable and undevelopable land. Undevelopable land shall include all wetlands, floodplains, sensitive ecological areas identified in the Natural Resource Inventory, slopes greater than 18%, poor soils and areas of concentrated woodlands. a. Please see attached Development Plan for the Calculation of the Proposed Density of the Project. b. The subject property does not include wetlands, floodplains, or sensitive ecological areas identified in the Natural Resource Inventory, slopes greater than 18%, poor soils and areas of concentrated woodlands. 6. Outline a conceptual development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the project, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed (including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas). a. The multi -family portion of the project shall be built out in 3 phases. The first of which shall commence in September 2019 and shall be completed in April 2020. Phase 2 shall commence August of 2020 and shall be completed in May of 2021. The third phase shall commence August of 2021 and shall be completed in May of 2022. b. The commercial portion of the project shall be completed based on market demand. The initial projections are that the commercial land will be absorbed at 3 acres per year or over a 3 -year period. The commercial land will be professionally marketed to third party buyers as well as on a build -to -suit basis. 7. A Concept PUD Proposal illustrating the nature and type of proposed development. At a minimum, the plan should show: a. Area calculations for gross land area- 18.6106 acres b. Existing zoning district(s)- B-4 Regional Business District c. Layout of proposed lots and proposed uses. Denote outlots planned for public dedication and/or open space (schools, parks, etc.) - See attached Development Plan. d. Area calculations for each parcel - See attached Development Plan. e. General location of wetlands and/or watercourses over the property and within 200 feet of the perimeter of the subdivision parcel - Non Applicable f. Location of existing and proposed streets within and immediately adjacent to the subdivision parcel - See attached Development Plan. g. Proposed sidewalks and trails - See attached Development Plan. h. Proposed parking areas - See attached Development Plan. i. Proposed parks, common areas, and preservation easements (indicate public vs. private if applicable) — Non Applicable. j. General location of wooded areas or significant features (environmental, historical, cultural) of the parcel - Non Applicable. k. Location of utility systems that will serve the property — To be determined. 1. Other: An applicant may submit any additional information that may explain the proposed PUD. 8. A listing of the areas of flexibility from the standard zoning sought through the use of PUD design. The PUD is based on the City of Monticello B4 Business zoning and R4 -Medium High Density Residential District as a basis for design. Modifications to the R4 district includes a 60' front yard setback and less density. R4 -Medium High Density Residential district provides for up to 25 units per acre while the proposed development plan provides for 18.4 units per acre. With regard to the commercial based land within the PUD the proposed plan does not seek to deviate from the guidelines set forth in the B4 -Regional District Zoning. From: Brendan Muldoon To: Anaela Schumann Cc: Jim Thares; Jacob Thunander; Tom Kern; mdbuchholzOomail.com Subject: PUD Premiere Bank Land Date: Thursday, June 13, 2019 9:36:18 AM Attachments: imaae001.Dno imaae002.Dna cc: Jim Thayers, Jacob Thunander, Tom Kern, Wayne Elam, Mark Buchholz Good morning Angela - After our phone call today I wanted to make our intentions clear with this particular project (as I sensed your hesitancy regarding above ground garages). It is, and has always been extremely important to the Buchholz Group to be up font and transparent with their intentions. It is equally important for them to follow through on projects and provide a mutual benefit not only to the development group, but also the city and community as a whole. One primary reason for the above ground garages is that underground parking adds somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 per unit, which ultimately translates into $1000- 1500 increase in annual rent that the residence would be required to pay. Another primary reason is my clients personal experience. In building (and managing) both underground parking as well as above ground garages, they have found that those who are within the demographic of typical renter consider this to be a substantial amount of money. We strongly agree with the findings of the Housing study that it is in Monticello's best interest to keep housing affordable as possible. We often refer to this as value driven. Furthermore, the proposed plan calls for a 2 stall garage with all the 2 and 3 bedroom units, whereas most multifamily with underground parking only provide one parking stall per unit. Often someone is forced to park outside, which is not a preferred option. In addition to residents needing a place to park their vehicles a high percentage of them need additional secure storage, which "open air" underground parking does not provide. In these cases the residents are often times forced to rent a self -storage unit which further drives up their cost of living. It is also worthwhile to note that the site plan is designed in a "fortress style" where the multifamily buildings almost entirely encapsulate the garages. This minimizes the site lines of the garages from the street and will showcase the landscaping and architecturally pleasing exteriors. Finally, the exterior aesthetics of the garages as proposed will be in architectural harmony with the buildings to be constructed with the same high grade and maintenance free materials. The main apartment building exterior and unit interiors will be designed to current trends, with a more "timeless" appeal. It is important for the development to "age well." The overall PUD proposal uses the existing B4 zoning and the R-4 as its guiding force. The above ground garages and our request for a variance on the setback standards are the only deviations and is therefore the reason that we are requesting the PUD. The PUD 3-9 references underground garages for "6-12" units which due the size of our building does not seem to apply in our case. If I'm mistaken in my assumptions than we would prefer to take the route of a zoning change to R4 with a variance for the setbacks. Simple put we believe this is a plan that we believe is economically feasible and fills the void of the lack of new multifamily options in Monticello since the 1980's (housing report). As for the commercial portion of the PUD we are not requesting any deviation from the standards set forth the B-4 zoning. As I mentioned in my email to Jacob Thunander, we strongly believe that the multifamily will serve as a catalyst for the development of the commercial portion of the project and there is an obvious vested interest as they will be pledged with the task of developing and market the surrounding commercial property within the PUD. It does not go without saying that any amendment to the comprehensive plan should not be taking lightly, however in certain circumstances an amendment is clearly warranted. Since Premier Bank acquired the subject land as a result of the deed in Lieu of Foreclosure, they have professionally marketed the property for a period of 10 years under the existing zoning classification without success. In short, we are not arguing that there isn't a need for projects with underground parking, however we believe providing the residents of Monticello with a choice and landowners/developers with flexibility is a good thing. As I've mentioned in our past meetings, the Buchholz Group has always approached every project with a Iona term view in mind. Since the Buchholz Group builds, self manages, and continue to own their multifamily properties for the long term they understand the importance of utilizing quality materials. Additionally, they understand that in order for a project to be successful they have to design, build, and manage in a manner that the prospective tenant sees as a value. We are not lookina for aovernmental assistance or financial incentives. Just the oDDortunity to fill a perceived need of one seament of the Monticello housina market. The proposed multifamily portion of the project when built out will be north of 20 million dollars, which doesn't even account for the commercial portion of the development. It will undoubtedly be a new and attract apartment community, create a large tax base, fulfill a perceived need, be a spring board for additional projects, and will be a compliment to the City of Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan states that the city "seeks to expand the supply of move up" housing which is a great goal. However in the process of accomplishing this goal, it is important that those that fall into different financial demographics are not forgotten in the process. I would greatly appreciate if you would share this email with members of the City Council and Planning Commission as a part of our PUD concept application. Thank you for your time and consideration. Brendan Muldoon Commercial Realtor & Business Intermediary PROPERTY RESOURCES GROUP MURPHY BUSINESS & FINANCIAL CORPORATION 4265 45th Street South, Suite 200 Fargo, North Dakota 58104 Phone: (701) 499-3938 Cell: (701) 318-2699 A& �r archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here. 1 12 3 14 5 LOT A (60,349 S.F.) (56,517 S.F.) // ' I D ' // 10' SETBACK AUXILIARY STRUCTURE \� s LOT C (61,948 S.F.) PROPERTY INFORMATION MONTICELLO APARTMENTS - MONTICELLO, MN OWNER - BUCHHOLZ CONSTRUCTION SITE DATA ZONING = PUD LOT AREA = 18.6106 ACRES OCCUPANCY = R-2 DENSITY 156 UNITS / 369,998 SF = 18.4 UNITS/ ACRE LOT D (60,104 S.F.) UNITS PROVIDED v ,o CHELSEA f,,,d COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (FUTURE) 440,950 SF STORMWATER EASEMENT 30' SETBACK J 7- STORMWATER EASEMENT MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT (369,998 SF) LOT E (57,666 S.F) — — — — — 1364.90' t N 1 SITE PLAN A001 SCALE:1 "=50'-0" s a; o 0 1 2 3 4 LOT F (51,504 S.F.) a 0 to 50' ACCESS C) EASEMENT -- -- - -- ---- rmim IC ROADE I � I I I � II II II II II I II II II I II it I I II I ,I I I II 60' SETBACK EASEMENT I I I L 10' SETBACK AUXILIARY STRUCTURE I 5 RHET ARCHITECTURE RHET ARCHITECTURE, LLC ATTN: RHET FISKNESS, AIA MAIL: 901 5th AVE. S. FARGO, ND 58103 A OFFICE: 2711th ST. S. FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.388.2867 EMAIL: RHET@RHET-ARCH.COM WEB: WWW.RHET-ARCH.COM I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature- Date- 442019 REG. NO.: 50755 PROJECT: B MONTICELLO APARTMENTS MONTICELLO, MN GENERAL CONTRACTOR: BUCHHOLZ CONSTRUCTION ATTN: MARK BUCHHOLZ PHONE: 701.371.1646 EMAIL: mdbuchholz@gmail.com CD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 6/3/2019 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE All plans, specifications, computer files, field data, notes and other documents and instruments prepared by RHET ARCHITECTURE, as instruments of service shall remain the property of RHET ARCHITECTURE. RHET ARCHITECTURE shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright thereto. PROJECT NO: 19-100603 DRAWN BY: RF CHECKED BY: RF DRAWING TITLE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN A001 C 0 • V .., - BUILDING #1 17 27 8 52 BUILDING #2 17 27 8 52 BUILDING #3 17 27 8 52 TOTAL 51 81 24 156 CHELSEA f,,,d COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (FUTURE) 440,950 SF STORMWATER EASEMENT 30' SETBACK J 7- STORMWATER EASEMENT MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT (369,998 SF) LOT E (57,666 S.F) — — — — — 1364.90' t N 1 SITE PLAN A001 SCALE:1 "=50'-0" s a; o 0 1 2 3 4 LOT F (51,504 S.F.) a 0 to 50' ACCESS C) EASEMENT -- -- - -- ---- rmim IC ROADE I � I I I � II II II II II I II II II I II it I I II I ,I I I II 60' SETBACK EASEMENT I I I L 10' SETBACK AUXILIARY STRUCTURE I 5 RHET ARCHITECTURE RHET ARCHITECTURE, LLC ATTN: RHET FISKNESS, AIA MAIL: 901 5th AVE. S. FARGO, ND 58103 A OFFICE: 2711th ST. S. FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.388.2867 EMAIL: RHET@RHET-ARCH.COM WEB: WWW.RHET-ARCH.COM I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature- Date- 442019 REG. NO.: 50755 PROJECT: B MONTICELLO APARTMENTS MONTICELLO, MN GENERAL CONTRACTOR: BUCHHOLZ CONSTRUCTION ATTN: MARK BUCHHOLZ PHONE: 701.371.1646 EMAIL: mdbuchholz@gmail.com CD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 6/3/2019 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE All plans, specifications, computer files, field data, notes and other documents and instruments prepared by RHET ARCHITECTURE, as instruments of service shall remain the property of RHET ARCHITECTURE. RHET ARCHITECTURE shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright thereto. PROJECT NO: 19-100603 DRAWN BY: RF CHECKED BY: RF DRAWING TITLE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN A001 C 0 A X. C EWA 1 1 2 3 'ROPERTY INFORMATION JIONTICELLO APARTMENTS - MONTICELLO, MN OWNER - BUCHHOLZ CONSTRUCTION SITE DATA ?ONING = PUD "OT AREA = 18.6106 ACRES OCCUPANCY = R-2 (61,948 S.F.) LOT D (60,104 S.F.) STORMWATER EASEMENT l UNITS PROVIDED r— BUILDING #1 S v "V 17 27 8 52 17 27 8 52 17 27 8 52 51 81 24 156 5 SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA TOTAL BUILDING AREA TOTAL GARAGE AREA TOTAL SIDEWALK AREA TOTAL DRIVELANE AREA TOTAL POND AREA TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA IGREEN SPACE PER UNIT (156 UNITS) TOTAL % PERVIOUS AREA 369,998 SF 45,750 SF 59,927 SF 1,812 SF 122,492 SF 19,628 SF 120,359 SF 1,003 SF/UNIT 32.5% «:r0 RiW:.:zn61 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (FUTURE) 440,950 SF - -- - -- - -- - -- LOT E LOT F (57,666 S.F.) (51,504 S.F.) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — Cn 50' ACCESS o EASEMENT w # PRI VA - - - - - - - - i WA''ER RETENTION POND 50' , ACCESS , , e ROAD _ _ EASEMENT , \ i� — — — — — — PRIVATE ROADE - -— J - -- -- -- -- --- -- - -- -- ----1 l I- 26 / 30 SETBACK 29 30' SETBACK LOT B 8 STORMWATER EASEMENT 10 &I �I nlnlnlnln (60,349 S.F.) - I II IIII II IIII I � II 'IBUILDING 21 � IFOUR-STO-R-E--------- _ v --------- II F -- -- -- 52 UNIT BUILDING 1 BUILDIN�#3TORYFOUR OURS/� STORY 52 UNIT ---------- 52' --- - 52' ] II I I I SNIT =/ - COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TRA \\\\\\\\\\\ , ! ✓ ° �z (FUTURE) 5 I I F �1 Ml LT FAMILY _ DEVELOPMENT (369,998 SF) \ r 105'-J7 15/1 LOT A I \WN ) (56,517 S.F. I \ \ -------I-------- 1 ( I � l 10 � SETBACK 60' SETBACK AUXILIARY STRUCTURE \I I EASEMENT �\I- •_• -- ------ I -- i- '- i ---i - -` �, 'I , i - i -. ,.� I : 1 - I 6itTRTRASH\1 8 1 \ =1364.90' L N10' SETBACK 1 SITE PLAN AUXILIARY STRUCTURE A001 SCALE:1 "=50'-0" 1 2 3 4 5 RHET ARCHITECTURE RHET ARCHITECTURE, LLC ATTN: RHET FISKNESS, AIA MAIL: 901 5th AVE. S. FARGO, ND 58103 A OFFICE: 27 11th ST. S. FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.388.2867 EMAIL: RHET@RHET-ARCH.COM WEB: WWW.RHET-ARCH.COM I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature. Date- -/-/2019 REG. NO.: 50755 oA NS 4�C�i C PROJECT: MONTICELLO APARTMENTS MONTICELLO, MN GENERAL CONTRACTOR: BUCHHOLZ CONSTRUCTION ATTN: MARK BUCHHOLZ PHONE: 701.371.1646 EMAIL: mdbuchholz@gmail.com CD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 6/19/2019 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE All plans, specifications, computer files, field data, notes and other documents and instruments prepared by RHET ARCHITECTURE, as instruments of service shall remain the property of RHET ARCHITECTURE. RHET ARCHITECTURE shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright thereto. PROJECT N0: 19-100603 DRAWN BY: RF CHECKED BY: RF DRAWING TITLE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN A001 C 0 I I w I I I I I I a z I 0 I -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — Cn 50' ACCESS o EASEMENT w # PRI VA - - - - - - - - i WA''ER RETENTION POND 50' , ACCESS , , e ROAD _ _ EASEMENT , \ i� — — — — — — PRIVATE ROADE - -— J - -- -- -- -- --- -- - -- -- ----1 l I- 26 / 30 SETBACK 29 30' SETBACK LOT B 8 STORMWATER EASEMENT 10 &I �I nlnlnlnln (60,349 S.F.) - I II IIII II IIII I � II 'IBUILDING 21 � IFOUR-STO-R-E--------- _ v --------- II F -- -- -- 52 UNIT BUILDING 1 BUILDIN�#3TORYFOUR OURS/� STORY 52 UNIT ---------- 52' --- - 52' ] II I I I SNIT =/ - COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TRA \\\\\\\\\\\ , ! ✓ ° �z (FUTURE) 5 I I F �1 Ml LT FAMILY _ DEVELOPMENT (369,998 SF) \ r 105'-J7 15/1 LOT A I \WN ) (56,517 S.F. I \ \ -------I-------- 1 ( I � l 10 � SETBACK 60' SETBACK AUXILIARY STRUCTURE \I I EASEMENT �\I- •_• -- ------ I -- i- '- i ---i - -` �, 'I , i - i -. ,.� I : 1 - I 6itTRTRASH\1 8 1 \ =1364.90' L N10' SETBACK 1 SITE PLAN AUXILIARY STRUCTURE A001 SCALE:1 "=50'-0" 1 2 3 4 5 RHET ARCHITECTURE RHET ARCHITECTURE, LLC ATTN: RHET FISKNESS, AIA MAIL: 901 5th AVE. S. FARGO, ND 58103 A OFFICE: 27 11th ST. S. FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.388.2867 EMAIL: RHET@RHET-ARCH.COM WEB: WWW.RHET-ARCH.COM I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature. Date- -/-/2019 REG. NO.: 50755 oA NS 4�C�i C PROJECT: MONTICELLO APARTMENTS MONTICELLO, MN GENERAL CONTRACTOR: BUCHHOLZ CONSTRUCTION ATTN: MARK BUCHHOLZ PHONE: 701.371.1646 EMAIL: mdbuchholz@gmail.com CD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 6/19/2019 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE All plans, specifications, computer files, field data, notes and other documents and instruments prepared by RHET ARCHITECTURE, as instruments of service shall remain the property of RHET ARCHITECTURE. RHET ARCHITECTURE shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright thereto. PROJECT N0: 19-100603 DRAWN BY: RF CHECKED BY: RF DRAWING TITLE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN A001 C 0 The future vision for Monticello provides the foundation for the Comprehensive Plan (the vision statement appears in Chapter 1). The Land Use Plan, in turn, provides the framework for how land will be used to help achieve the future vision for Monticello. The Land Use Plan seeks to reinforce desirable land use patterns, identify places where change is needed and guide the form and location of future growth. The Land Use Plan for Monticello was shaped by a variety of factors, including: ► Community input gathered through public workshops and Task Force discussions. ► The existing built and natural environment in Monticello. ► The vision for Monticello's future. ► Factors described in the Community Context chapter of the Plan. ► Systems plans for transportation, sanitary sewer and water supply. This represents a departure in form from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan. The 1996 Plan included the land use plan as part of a broader Development Framework section. The 1996 Plan described Monticello's land use plan by general district of the community as a means of attending to the unique issues in each district. The 2008 Update of the Comprehensive Plan establishes a separate land use chapter consisting of the following components: ► A section on Future Growth describes the implications of future resident growth and the amount of growth anticipated by the Plan. ► The Land Use Plan Mau (see Figure 3-2) shows the land uses assigned to each parcel of land. ► Land Use Categories further explain the Land Use Plan by describing the land uses depicted in the Map. This section includes land use policies describe the objectives that Monticello seeks to achieve through the implementation of the Land Use Plan and the supporting elements of the Comprehensive Plan. ► Focus Areas provide a more detailed discussion of characteristics, goals and policies for key areas of the community. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-1 Future Growth In looking to the future, Monticello must not just consider the qualities of the future community, but also the nature of growth. Assumptions about the amount and pace of future growth are important parts of the foundation for the Comprehensive Plan. Growth has several important implications for the Comprehensive Plan: ► Growth projections are used to plan for the capacity of municipal utility systems. ► Growth projections are used to create and manage finance plans for capital improvements. ► The school system uses growth projections to forecast enrollments and to plan for programs and facilities. ► Market studies use growth projections to analyze the potential for locating or expanding businesses in Monticello. ► The characteristics of growth influence the amount of land needed to support this development. ► Growth adds trips to the local street system. ► Assumptions about growth influence the policies and actions needed to implement the Comprehensive Plan. For these reasons, it is essential that the Comprehensive Plan state assumptions of the nature of future growth. A challenge in forecasting future residential development is that the Comprehensive Plan influences, but does not control, the factors that determine where people live. These factors include: ► Quality of life. ► Access to employment. ► Availability of desired housing and neighborhood options. ► Affordability. ► Competition from other places in the region. Given these uncertainties, the Comprehensive Plan seeks a balance between optimism and prudence. For many reasons, the Plan should not significantly understate the growth potential of Monticello. The balancing force lies with the implications of assuming Figure 3-1: Growth Trends and Projections 300 256 250 2az 223 22 208 200 - 67 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 +Actual 150 - 130 t projected 110 100 - 90 77 70 +\ 50 50 \- 30" 0 000 ti1 00'L 000 00$ 0,�0 01'1, Oyb 010 0.�0 0.1,0 ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti more growth than is reasonable. The chart in Figure 3-1 shows the projection of future residential growth assumed in the Comprehensive Plan. The projections assumes that the rate of growth slowly rises over the next five years and continues at a level of 150 units per year from 2012 to 2020. This amount falls below the 229 units/year average for 2001 through 2005. This rate of growth is intended to reflect several factors. Monticello will remain a desirable place to live, attracting both builders and residents. Housing market conditions will improve from the weaknesses experienced in 2006 and 2007. A combination of market conditions, local policy objectives, and changing demographics may reduce the potential for achieving and sustaining higher rates of residential growth. Slower future growth reflects the belief that achieving the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, in particular seeking more move up housing, will result in less development than in previous years. Growth Policies 1. The City will consistently review recent development trends and update growth projections to serve as a basis for public and private planning. 2. Over the life of this Comprehensive Plan, growth will occur within the boundaries of the current municipal boundaries and the Orderly Annexation Area. 3. Future development should be guided to locations that utilize existing infrastructure and locations 3-2 1 Land Use City of Monticello that facilitate the construction of street and utility systems that meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate action by Monticello to annex or extend utility systems to property immediately north of the Mississippi River. Development in this area will place additional traffic on STH 25 (particularly in the Downtown area) and channel investment away from other parts of the City, especially the Downtown. Land Use Plan Map The Land Use Plan Map (shown in Figure 3-2) shows the desired land use for all property in Monticello and the Orderly Annexation Area The land use plan depicted in this map builds on the previous community planning in Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan uses the Land Use Plan to define the broad land use patterns in Monticello. The Land Use Plan seeks to: an effective land use management tool requires a definition of each land use. These definitions provide a common understanding of the basic characteristics of each category used in the Land Use Plan. The 1996 Plan relies on three basic categories of private land use: residential, commercial and industrial. Each of these categories is further divided into subcategories that distinguish between the character, type and intensity of development desired in different locations. The 2008 update of the Comprehensive Plan uses a different approach to achieve similar land use patterns. The Land Use Plan map depicts series of "places" for private development: Places to Live, Places to Shop, Places to Work, and Downtown. This approach is based on the following rationale: ► These broad categories more clearly illustrate the pattern of development and the plan for future growth. ► Although residential land uses vary by type and density, they share many public objectives. ► Organize the community in a sustainable ► This approach makes a more enduring manner. ► Make efficient use of municipal utility systems and facilitate the orderly and financially feasible expansion of these systems. ► Provide the capacity for the type of growth desired by the community. The Land Use Plan Map is only one piece of the land use plan for Monticello. The other parts of the Land Use chapter of the Comprehensive Plan work with this map to explain the intent and objectives for future land use. Further, this map lays the foundation for land use controls that are used by the City to implement the Comprehensive Plan. Land Use Categories The Land Use Plan Map uses a set of specific categories to guide land use in Monticello. One element missing from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan was a description of the land use categories shown in the Land Use Plan. The ability to use the Comprehensive Plan as comprehensive plan. The Plan can guide an area for the appropriate land use without the need to predict future community needs and market forces. ► The Plan relies on policies, land use regulations, performance standards and public actions to provide a more detailed guide for land use and development. This approach conveys more flexibility and control to the City Council and the Planning Commission. Role of Zoning Regulations Zoning regulations play a critical role in implementing land use plans in Monticello. State Law gives zoning regulations priority overthe Comprehensive Plan. If land uses are different, zoning regulations control the use of land. Zoning regulations are particularly important in the application of the land use categories in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. The "places to" land use categories set forth a broad and flexible land use pattern for Monticello. Zoning regulations (and other land use controls) will be used to determine the appropriate location for each form of development and other regulations on the use of land, consistent with policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-3 Figure 32Land Use Pian Ma | )� cot, / # 10 E2 , � ■ )\ , V A _ a. ` { ] ! r ! f -o - }\ U) �k / ,ƒ } $\ \ �\ )27)!$_(k!{ JC, 00 LU(L! \�������� �}��/�❑����/Z�\ , 3-4 1 [and use City of Monticello � ■ ,ƒ } ---.w \ \ - \ \ ] (\ . { 3-4 1 [and use City of Monticello Figure 3-3: Land Use Plan - Places to Live w '. �. +�r Y The remainder of this section describes the categories used in the Comprehensive Plan in greater detail. Places to Live The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create and sustain quality places for people to live in Monticello (see Figure 3-3). This category designates areas where housing is the primary use of land. The emphasis behind Places to Live is to help ensure that Monticello offers a full range of housing choices, while preserving and enhancing the quality of neighborhoods. Although a single land use category, Places to Live does not suggest housing is a homogenous commodity or that any type of housing is desirable or allowed in any location. • r � r r � � r � � � � j � Y IP-k� L... When someone says "house" the most common image is a single family detached dwelling. This housing style is characterized by several features. There is a one-to- one relationship between house and parcel of land - the housing unit is located on a single parcel. The house is not physically attached to another housing unit. The housing is designed for occupancy by a single family unit. The typical neighborhood in Monticello is made up exclusively of single family detached homes. The primary variables become the design of the subdivision, the size of the lot and the size and style of the dwelling. Many older neighborhoods in Monticello (north of Interstate 94) were built on a traditional grid street system. Over the past thirty years, development patterns have moved to a new suburban curvilinear 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-5 pattern, characterized by curvilinear street layout with the use of cul-de-sacs. A variety of factors, including consumer preference and housing cost, have increased the construction of attached housing in recent years. Duplexes, twin homes, quads and townhomes are common examples of this housing style. Although the specific form changes, there are several common characteristics. Each housing unit is designed for occupancy by a single family. The housing units are physically attached to each other in a horizontal orientation. Places to Live will include some neighborhoods designed to offer a mixture of housing types and densities. Mixed residential neighborhoods create a pattern that combines single-family detached housing with a mixture of attached housing types. Using good design and planning, these mixed residential neighborhoods can achieve a higher density without compromising the overall integrity of the low-density residential pattern. This integration strengthens neighborhoods by increasing housing choice and affordability beyond what is possible by today's rules and regulations. It also avoids large and separate concentrations of attached housing. It enhances opportunities to organize development in a manner that preserves natural features. A complete housing stock includes higher density residential areas that consist of multi -family housing types such as apartments and condominiums. In the near term, the Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate expanding the existing supply of higher density housing. It is likely that Monticello will need additional higher density housing to: ► Provide housing suited to the needs of an aging population. ► Facilitate redevelopment in the Downtown or in other appropriate locations of the community. ► Provide housing needed to attract the work force required to achieve economic development goals of the City. Higher density residential land uses should be located and designed to be compatible with nearby residential or mixed uses, on lots able to accommodate larger buildings and added traffic generation. In addition, siting factors for high density residential uses will prioritize access to services and amenities including public utilities, parks, trails and open space, and commercial and/or medical services. It will be important, when considering potential designation of high density housing development, that the parcels meet the specific standards of the zoning district, and such development can be accommodated in accordance with the policies in this Plan. While these comments and the comments in the zoning ordinance are intended to be instructive they are not necessarily the only factors that might come into play on specific properties. Policies - Places to Live The Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the following objectives for residential land use in Monticello: 1. Provide a range of housing choices that fit all stages of a person's life -cycle (see below). 2. Support development in areas that best matches the overall objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Develop quality neighborhoods that create a sense of connection to the community and inspire sustained investment. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain the quality and integrity of existing neighborhoods by encouraging the maintenance of property and reinvestment into the existing housing stock. Changes in housing type should be allowed only to facilitate necessary redevelopment. 4. Create neighborhoods that allow residents to maintain a connection to the natural environment and open spaces. 5. Seek quality over quantity in residential growth. Achieving the objectives for quality housing and neighborhoods may reduce the overall rate of growth. 6. Reserve areas with high amenities for "move up" housing as desired in the vision statement. These amenities may include forested areas, wetland complexes, adjacency to parks and greenways. Some of the City's policy objectives require further explanation. 3-6 1 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-4: Life Cycle of Housing Supply u l lul III IL-1 U, MIK I Life Cycle Housing Housing is not a simple "one size fits all" commodity. Monticello's housing stock varies by type, age, style and price. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the characteristics of the housing stock based on the 2000 Census and recent building permit trends. The concept of life cycle housing recognizes that housing needs change over the course of a person's life (see Figure 3-4). Young adults may not have the income capacity to own the typical single family home. This segment of the population often seeks rental housing. Families move through different sizes, styles and prices of housing as family size and income changes over time. With aging, people may desire smaller homes with less maintenance. Eventually, the elderly transition to housing associated with options for direct care. As noted in the Vision Statement, Monticello's population will continue to become more diverse. This diversity will be seen in age, race, culture and wealth. These factors will influence the housing needs of Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes these differences and seeks to create a balanced housing supply that encourages people to move to and stay in Monticello. This balance may not be achieved solely by market forces guided by this Land Use Plan. Actions by the City may be needed to promote the creation of housing in underserved segments of the market. Neighborhood Design A priority for the community is diversification of the housing stock by providing more "move up" housing. In this context, the term "move up" housing refers to larger homes with more amenities in structure and setting. This type of housing may not be exclusively single-family detached or low density. Attached forms of housing with medium or high densities may meet the objectives for move up housing in the appropriate locations. In this way, the objectives for move up housing and life cycle housing are compatible and supportive. While every community wants a high quality housing stock, this issue has particular importance in Monticello. It is a key to retaining population. Without a broader 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-7 variety of housing options, families may encouraged to leave Monticello to meet their need for a larger home. It is a factor in economic development. One facet of attracting and retaining professional jobs is to provide desirable housing alternatives. It must be recognized that creating move up housing requires more than policies in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for achieving the desired results. The desired outcomes require private investment. This investment occurs when demand exists or the City can provide an incentive to attract investment. Part of attracting move up housing comes from creating great neighborhoods — places that will attract and sustain the housing options sought by the City. Neighborhoods are the building block of Places to Live in Monticello. The goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to create and maintain attractive, safe and functional neighborhoods. The following policies help to achieve this objective: Neighborhoods should incorporate the natural characteristics of the setting. Trees, terrain, drainageways, and other natural features provide character to neighborhoods. 2. Housing should be oriented to the local street, minimizing access and noise conflicts with collector streets. 3. The City will use public improvements to enhance the appearance and character of a neighborhood. Some examples of improvements that define an area include streets with curb and gutter, trees in the public boulevard, street lighting systems, and storm water ponding. 4. Sidewalks, trails, and bikeways will connect the neighborhood to other parts of the community. 5. Every neighborhood should have reasonable access to a public park as a place for residents to gather and play. All of these elements work together to create a desirable and sustainable place to live. Figure 3-5: Relationship Between Development and Natural Features - Parkway Figure 3-6: Relationship Between Development and Natural Features - Trail Corridor 9 T7 7i- I I -F Balancing the Built and Natural Environments The natural amenities of the growth areas (west and south) in Monticello should serve as a catalyst for residential development. The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park offers the dual assets of natural features and recreational opportunities. Lakes, wetlands and other natural amenities exist throughout the orderly annexation area. Studies have shown that parks and open space have a positive economic effect on adjacent development. An article published by the National Park and Recreation Association states that "recent analyses suggest that open spaces may have substantial positive impacts on surrounding property values and hence, the 3-8 1 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-7. Example of Conservation Design Development • OPEN SPACE DESIGN Pastures Equestrian Facility }- Wetlands Enhancements ~ - Conservation Easements yt - Central Park w -- - 27 Acre Park South of Lake 4 NEIGHBORHOOD FEATURES ' + - Central Park Northeast Neighborhood Green South Neighborhood Green Association Dock and Park ru property tax base, providing open space advocates with convincing arguments in favor of open space designation and preservation." Balancing the built and natural environments should provide a catalyst to the types of development desired by the City and in the expansion of the property tax base. In attempting to meet residential development objectives, the City should not lose sight of long-term public benefit from access to these same natural areas. The original development of Monticello provides an excellent illustration. The majority of the riverfront in Monticello is controlled by private property. Public access to the River comes at points provided by public parks. A well known example of balancing public use with private development is the Minneapolis chain of lakes and Minnehaha Creek. Public streets (parkways) and trails separate neighborhoods from the natural NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOI ' 4? Total Housing Units: 98 Semi -Custom, Single -Family Homes Lot Width: 82' Minimum Lot Size: 9,900 to 16,000 Sq. Ft. t 7 dL House Sq. Ft: 2,400 to 4,800 Sq. Ft. Price Point Packages: $450,000 to $650,000 3 %f NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD Total Housing Units: 66 Custom, Luxury Twin Homes Lot Width: 45'x 90' Twinhome Lot Size: 4,050 Sq. Ft. House Sq. Ff.: 2,800 to 3,800 Sq. Ft. Price PointPackages: $475,00010 $750,000 gT od�— yt , features, preserving public use and access. These neighborhoods are some of the most desirable in the region, demonstrating that public use and private benefit are not mutually exclusive. The figures on the previous page show two options for integrating housing, natural features and public use. Figure 3-5 is the parkway concept. An attractive street forms the edge between the park (or natural area) and the housing. A multi -use trail follows the street while homes face the street and draw on the attractiveness of both the parkway and the natural amenities. The alternative is to use a trail corridor to provide public access to these areas (see Figure 3-6). The trail follows the edge of the natural area. Access to the trail between lots should come at reasonable intervals. There are a variety of real world examples of how Minnesota cities have used conservation design strategies to promote high quality development and 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-9 preserve the natural environment. The illustrations in Figure 3-7 shows elements of the Chevalle development in Chaska. Using open space design and rural residential cluster development techniques, HKGi's concept plan provides for a variety of housing options while preserving a majority of the area as permanent owner. This relationship may include a third party property manager retained by the owner to perform maintenance duties. Owners of attached housing may act collectively through a homeowner's association. In multiple family rental housing, the tenants have no direct responsibility for property maintenance. This open space, including public and common open discussion does not imply a preference, but is intended spaces. Amenities would include access to protected solely to highlight the differences. This understanding open spaces (lakeshore, woods, meadows, pastures, wetlands), walking/biking trails, equestrian trails and facilities, common outdoor structures and an environmental learning center. The experience of other cities and developments can guide future planning and decision making in Monticello. Attractive Places Attractive physical appearance is one of the most common attributes of Places to Live in Monticello. Attractiveness is a combination of design, construction and maintenance. These characteristics apply to buildings and sites. Attractiveness is relevant for both private and public property. Attractiveness reflects individual pride in property as well as an overall sense of community quality. The City may use a variety of regulatory tools to influence the potential for attractive neighborhoods: ► Building codes and additional regulations to promote quality construction. ► Subdivision regulations control the initial configuration of lots. ► Zoning regulations establish limitations on the size of lots, placement of the house on a lot, relationship of structure size to lot area, and building height. ► Nuisance ordinances enable the City to prevent and correct undesirable uses of property. ► Other City regulations control other ancillary uses of residential property. Maintenance of property is a factor in sustaining quality neighborhoods. The tenure (form of ownership) influences the responsibility for housing maintenance. The owner -occupant of a single family detached home is solely responsible for the maintenance of building and grounds. If this same home is rented, maintenance responsibilities are often shared between tenant and becomes relevant when public action is needed to address a failure of the private maintenance approach. Nuisance ordinances are one tool used by the City to address failures in private maintenance and use of property. Economics also influences property maintenance. The greater the portion of income devoted to basic housing costs (mortgage/rent, taxes, utilities), the less money available for maintenance activities. Maintenance can be deferred, but not avoided. If left unchecked, this cycle of avoided maintenance produces negative effects. Safe Places Safety is frequently identified as the most desired characteristic of Places to Live. Several aspects of the Comprehensive Plan and city government influence safe neighborhoods. 1. The City will encourage existing neighborhoods and develop new neighborhoods where people are involved in the community, interact with their neighbors and support each other. 2. The City will design, build and maintain a system of streets that collects traffic from neighborhoods, allows movement within Monticello to jobs, shopping and other destinations and minimizes traffic that "cuts through" neighborhoods on local streets seeking other destinations. 3. The City will provide, directly or by contract, services needed to protect people and property. 4. The City will support the Land Use Plan with a water supply that provides clean water at pressures needed to support fire suppression. 5. The City will protect the natural environment by requiring new development to connect to the sanitary sewer system and by adequately treating all municipal wastewater. 3-10 1 Land Use City of Monticello 0 0 Figure 3-8: Land Use Plan - Places to Work &W&aM # # I +0 025 0.5 , _� Miles ■; f —S—­—R,$Mrb.,County,W gh1 C .Iy, and WSB &Assooa , 0—b- The City will provide water that is safe to drink by protecting water supply sources. Places to Work This land use is primarily intended for industrial development. Places to Work seeks to provide locations for the retention, expansion and creation of businesses that provide jobs for Monticello residents and expansion and diversification of the property tax base. In order to be a center of employment with a wide range of job opportunities, it is critical that Monticello preserve sufficient land for Places to Work over the next twenty-five years. These land uses can be one of the most challenging to locate because of its need for + A avL.A& J—'�N4�410. convenient transportation access and influence on surrounding land uses. In planning for future Places to Work, the Comprehensive Plan considers the goals of the community; what type of industrial development is sought; and what factors should be considered when locating an industrial land use. In planning for sustaining existing businesses and attracting new development, it is necessary to understand why Places to Work are important to Monticello. The objectives for this land use include: ► Expanding and diversifying the property tax base. ► Providing jobs with an increasing opportunity for people to work and live in Monticello. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-11 Figure 3-9: Land Use Plan - Places to Shop -I + Nr .E 0 0.25 0.5 1 1040 —� Miles ■ �; ■ - a 131 * *.*+ f — D- S— M DNR, She b— Oowty, Wnght Cowry, and WSB &Assooates October 12, 2017 � \ °I ,i Palo [9(w . ► Promoting wage levels that provide incomes establishment of business campus settings that needed to purchase decent housing, support local provide a high level of amenities, including businesses and support local government services. architectural controls, landscaping, preservation of ► Take advantage of opportunities to attract natural features, storage enclosed within buildings, companies that have a synergy with existing and other features. The zoning ordinance, companies in the community, including suppliers, subdivision regulations and other land use controls customers and collaborative partners. will also be used to create and maintain the desired business campus settings. ► Encouraging the retention and expansion of existing businesses in Monticello. 3. Places to Work supports the City's desire to attract businesses that complement existing businesses Policies - Places to Work or benefit from the community's infrastructure, 1. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to including power and telecommunications. designate and preserve a supply of land for Places 4. The Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that to Work that meets current and future needs. Places to Work should provide locations for 2. Consistent with the vision for the future of other general industrial development in the areas Monticello, the Land Use Plan promotes the 3-12 1 Land Use City of Monticello of manufacturing, processing, warehousing, distribution and related businesses. S. Places to Work may include non -industrial businesses that provide necessary support to the underlying development objectives of this land use. Examples of supporting land uses include lodging, office supplies and repair services. Additional public objectives and strategies for Places to Work can be found in the Economic Development chapter. Places to Shop Places to Shop designate locations that are or can be developed with businesses involved with the sale of goods and services. Places to Shop may include offices for service businesses. Places to Shop guides land uses The Comprehensive Plan describes issues, plans and policies related to the Downtown in several sections of the Plan. between the commercial parcel and adjacent residential uses. that are both local and regional in nature. These policies help to create sustainable locations for Policies -Places to Shop Places to Shop in a manner that enhances Monticello. In guiding land uses for Places to Shop, the Downtown Comprehensive Plan seeks to: 1. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to attract and retain businesses that provide goods and services needed by Monticello residents. 2. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to capture the opportunity for commercial development that serves a broader region. Places to Shop with a regional orientation should be located where the traffic does not disadvantage travel within Monticello. 3. Commercial development will be used to expand and diversify the local property tax base and as an element of a diverse supply of local jobs. 4. Places to Shop will be located on property with access to the street capacity needed to support traffic from these businesses. 5. Each parcel should supply an adequate supply of parking that makes it convenient to obtain the goods and services. 6. Building materials, facades and signage should combine with public improvements to create an attractive setting. 7. Site design must give consideration to defining edges and providing buffering or separation The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted by City Council resolution 2012-011 on January 9, 2012. The City embarked on an update to the Downtown Plan in 2017 and the Downtown Small Area Plan was adopted by City Council resolution 2017-070 on September 25, 2017 and is herein incorporated as an appendix of the Comprehensive Plan. Downtown is a unique commercial district that is part of Monticello's heritage and identity. It is, however, no longer possible for Downtown to be Monticello's central business district. The mass of current and future commercial development south of Interstate 94 along TH 25 and in east Monticello along interstate 94 have replaced the downtown area as primary shopping districts. The future success of downtown requires it to be a place unlike any other in Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the Vision, and Goals described in the Downtown Small Area Plan. Downtown is intended to be a mix of inter -related and mutually supportive land uses. Businesses involved with the sale of goods and services should be the focus of Downtown land use. Residential development facilitates reinvestment and places potential customers 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-13 in the Downtown area. Civic uses draw in people from across the community. During the planning process, the potential for allowing commercial activity to extend easterly out of the Downtown along Broadway was discussed. The Comprehensive Plan consciously defines Cedar Street as the eastern edge of Downtown for two basic reasons: (1) Downtown should be successful and sustainable before new areas of competition are created; and (2) The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain and enhance the integrity of residential neighborhoods east of Downtown. More than any other land use category, Downtown has strong connections to other parts of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore the City has adopted the Downtown Small Area Plan as its guiding planning document for the Downtown. The following parts of the Comprehensive Plan also address community desires and plans for the Downtown area: 10. 10. 10. The Land Use chapter contains a specific focus area on Downtown. The focus area contains a more detailed discussion of the issues facing the Downtown and potential public actions needed to address these issues. The operation of the street system is a critical factor for the future of Downtown. The Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation Framework of the Downtown Small Area Plan influence the ability of residents to travel to Downtown and the options for mitigating the impacts of traffic on Highway 25 and other Downtown streets. The Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Parks & Open Space Framework of the Downtown Small Area Plan provide for parks in the Downtown and the trail systems that allow people to reach Downtown on foot or bicycle. The Economic Development chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Implementation chapter of the Downtown Small Area Plan lay the foundation for public actions and investments that will be needed to achieve the desired outcomes. Goals - Downtown ► Improve Pine Street for all users. ► Shift the center of Downtown to Broadway and Walnut Streets ► Encourage Small and Medium Scaled Investments ► Become a River Town Policies/Guiding Principles - Downtown 1. Downtown is a special and unique part of Monticello. It merits particular attention in the Comprehensive Plan and in future efforts to achieve community plans and objectives. 2. Downtown is intended to be an inter -connected and supportive collection of land uses. Land uses should support and enhance the overall objectives for Downtown. 3. The City will build on core assets of greater Downtown Monticello as identified in the Downtown Small Area Plan. These assets include the preponderance of civic activity, proximity to the river, a grid of streets and small blocks, and a varied building stock - both old and new. 4. A shared vision among property owners, business owners and the City is the foundation for effective team work and long term success. 5. A shared understanding of realistic market potential is the foundation for design and generation of a healthy mix of land uses. This includes both residential and non-residential land uses. Housing the core blocks is encouraged to be medium density (apartments or townhouses) and to face the perimeter of the blocks and be pedestrian friendly, either with street level commercial uses or doors, stoops, porches, plazas, or other features that face the sidewalk. 6. A safe, attractive human scale environment and entrepreneurial businesses that actively emphasize personal customer service will differentiate Downtown from other shopping districts. 7. Property values can be enhanced if property owners and the City share a vision for Downtown and actively seek to cultivate a safe, appealing environment and attractive mix of inter -related uses. 3-14 1 Land Use City of Monticello 8. Housing in the Downtown can facilitate necessary redevelopment and bring potential customers directly into the area. Housing may be free- standing or in shared buildings with street level commercial uses. 9. Downtown is the civic center of Monticello. To the degree possible, unique public facilities (such as the Community Center, the Library and the Post Office) should be located in the Downtown area as a means to bring people into the Downtown. 10. Downtown should emphasize connections with the Mississippi River that are accessible by the public. It is especially important to design Broadway so it is easy and safe to cross as a pedestrian or cyclist - with an emphasis on Walnut and Cedar Streets. 11. Downtown should be a pedestrian -oriented place in a manner that cannot be matched by other commercial districts. Pedestrian scale is achieved at the scale of both the block and the building. Blocks should reflect the historic fabric of the City and buildings should present a pedestrian friendly facade to the sidewalk. 12. Downtown should have an adequate supply of free parking for customers distributed throughout the area. The Downtown should be well connected so customers are comfortable walking 1-2 blocks from their car to their destination. 13. The City and business community must work actively with MnDOT to ensure safe local access to the Downtown. All of these policies work together to attract people to Downtown and to enhance the potential for a successful Downtown environment. Mixed Use The Mixed Use is a transition area between the Downtown and the hospital campus. It has been created in recognition of the unique nature of this area. The area serves two functions. It is the edge between long-term residential neighborhoods and a major transportation corridor (Broadway Street). It is also a link between the Downtown, the hospital campus and the east interchange retail area. The primary goal of this land use is to preserve and enhance housing in this part of Monticello. Any non-residential development should be designed to minimize the impacts on and conflicts with adjacent neighborhoods. Policies - Mixed Use Development should not have direct access to Broadway street. Access should come from side street. 2. Non-residential development should be limited to small retail, service and office businesses. The scale, character and site design should be compatible with the adjacent residential neighborhoods. 3. All non-residential development will be oriented to Broadway Street and not to 3rd Street or River Street. 4. Commercial development compatible with the Downtown should be encouraged to locate there. 5. More intense housing and commercial uses maybe allowed if directly related to the hospital. Places to Recreate Places to Recreate consist of public parks and private recreation facilities. The land uses are essential elements of the quality of life in Monticello. The Parks and Trails chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the current park and trail system and the future plan to maintain and enhance this system. The Comprehensive Plan is only one aspect of managing the land use for public parks and private recreation facilities. The City's zoning regulations place these locations into a zoning district. Often, the purpose of the zoning district is to guide private development, such as housing. Under current State Law, zoning regulations "trump" the Land Use Plan and govern the use of land. With the potential for the redevelopment of golf courses, it is important the Comprehensive Plan and other land use controls work in concert to achieve the desired outcomes. The City's plans and policies for parks, trails and open space can be found in the Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-15 Places for Community Places for Community consist of public and semi- public land uses. Public uses include all governmental facilities (city, county, state and federal) and schools. This category also applies to churches, cemeteries, hospitals, and other institutional uses. It is important to note that these land uses relate only to existing land uses. The Comprehensive Plan does not guide the location of new churches, schools, public buildings and other institutional land uses. Places for Community will be needed in the Northwest area as it develops. These uses are typically allowed in residential areas and governed by zoning regulations. These institutional uses (such as schools and churches) are important parts of the fabric of the community, but require guidance to ensure a proper fit with its residential surroundings. New institutional use should be allowed in residential areas under certain conditions. These conditions should address the aspects of the use that conflict with desired characteristics of residential neighborhood. Criteria for locating an institutional use in a residential land use area include: 1. Size. Large buildings and site areas can disrupt neighborhood cohesiveness. Use in lower density residential areas should not be more than [to be determined] square feet in lot area. 2. Parking. Parking may spill on to neighborhood streets without adequate on-site facilities. The parking needs will vary with the use of the facility. Each facility should provide adequate on-site or reasonable off-site shared parking based on the use of the facility. 3. Traffic. Institutional uses should be oriented to designated collector or arterial streets. 4. Lighting and signage. Site lighting and signage needs may resemble commercial uses. These site factors should be managed to fit the character of the surrounding residential development. Urban Reserve The Urban Reserve contains all property in the Orderly Annexation Area that it not shown for development in the near term in this Plan. The objective is to encourage rural and agricultural uses, preventing barriers to future development opportunities. It is anticipated that the City will grow into portions of the Urban Reserve as planned land use areas become fully developed and capacity for future growth in needed. The Urban Reserve is not simply a holding area for future development. Parts of the Urban Reserve are likely to be preserved as natural resource areas or for agricultural purposes. Future planning will consider the locations in the Urban Reserve best suited for development. Interchange Planning Area The Interchange Planning Area encompasses undeveloped land in the northwest part of Monticello around the site of a potential west interchange with Interstate 94. The purpose of this land use is to preserve the area for future development and prevent the creation of development barriers. If built, the area should be planned to support a mixture of commercial, employment and residential land uses. The interchange location and the routes of future connecting roads are solely for illustration. Future land use issues in this area are discussed in the Focus Area for Northwest Monticello. Private Infrastructure This category applies to Xcel Energy's power plant and railroad right-of-way. This category recognizes the unique role of the power plant in Monticello. Greenway The Land Use Plan Map shows a "potential greenway" ringing the western and southern edges of Monticello. The Greenway is intended to provide an environmental corridor that connects large community parks and open spaces to neighborhoods, schools, shopping areas and places to work. They serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas such as natural habitat, wetlands, tree canopy, and drainage ways. Land within this corridor could be comprised of a combination of public and private open space. Development would not be prohibited within the greenway but would be 3-16 1 Land Use City of Monticello reasonably restricted to ensure that development is carefully integrated with the natural environment. The Greenway is intended to shape development patterns in a manner that is sensitive to the existing environment and harmonious with the landscape. The Greenway creates opportunities for a continuous trail corridor connecting neighborhoods with large parks and open spaces. A trail within this corridor is intended to be fully accessible to the general public. The following are the City's goals for the Greenway: 1. To provide (where possible) a continuous green corridor connecting large community parks and open spaces to neighborhoods, shopping areas, schools and places to work. 2. To connect people to significant places. 3. To protect the community's natural resources (trees, ponds, wetlands, slopes, etc). 4. To create environmentally sensitive development and design. 5. To provide opportunities for corridors for wildlife movement and ecological connections between natural areas. Focus Areas For certain parts of Monticello, the intentions of the Comprehensive Plan cannot be adequately described solely with the land use map and the related category descriptions. The following Focus Areas provide a more detailed examination of the plans and issues in key locations that will shape the future of Monticello. Northwest Monticello Figure 3-10: Land Use Plan -Northwest Monticello proximity to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park should be reserved for move up housing. 3. Expansion of existing Places to Work in a manner that creates more "head of household" jobs. 4. Preserve and promote public use of natural areas, including the establishment of greenway corridors. S. Identify and preserve key street corridors. 6. Preserve areas for future Places to Shop and Places to Work around a future highway interchange, if such an interchange proves viable. The Comprehensive Plan envisions that growth will This focus area includes the entire northwest corner extend westward from existing development. The of the community. The land use objectives in this area initial high amenity residential development is expected include: 1. Encourage development in this part of the community to utilize infrastructure investments and to provide the capacity to develop in high amenity areas. 2. Provide for a variety of housing alternatives based on the natural features and the surrounding land uses. Areas with high natural amenities or to occur along the eastern perimeter of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. No Places to Live are planned with the boundaries of this park. Future development will be influenced by the capacity of the street system, including plans for the construction of a highway interchange. 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-17 The remainder of this section describes the land use issues and objectives for northwest Monticello in greater detail. West Interchange A new interchange with Interstate 94 is a critical should not be limited to the property in the Interchange Planning Area land use category. An interchange and the supporting street system has future land use implications for a broader area. Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park variable in the future development of this area. While Another critical factor in the future of the Northwest the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the potential for a future interchange, in 2008 it is only a concept. It is not part of the State's plans for future highway improvements for this district. This interchange could be a valuable part of the long- term transportation plan for Monticello if it is part of a new river crossing that removes traffic from Highway 25. Without the bridge, the primary benefit is to provide access to this area and expand the development opportunities. The Land Use Plan assumes that the interchange is a future possibility. For this reason, property adjacent to the interstate has been placed into a combination of Places to Live, Work and Shop. The Plan seeks to prevent development from limiting the location of the interchange (or block it) and to preserve the area around the interchange for future commercial, industrial and residential development. Without the access provided by the interchange, commercial, industrial and residential development should not be anticipated in this area. Ideally, the City will pursue additional investigations following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. These investigations should be designed to resolve some of the unanswered questions related to the interchange. These questions include: Area is the former YMCA camp that is being converted into the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. The City and Wright County formed a partnership in 2005 to start purchasing portions of the 1,200 acre YMCA property. As of 2013, 495 acres have been purchased through state grants with another 300 planned for acquisition. The YMCA will lease land at the regional park to run their Camp Manitou Summer Camp. The area around this park is guided for future Places to Live. No residential development should be allowed within the park. The amenity of this land and the regional park provide an excellent setting (around the perimeter of the park) for some of the "upscale" neighborhoods and housing desired by the City. In planning for this park, it is important to look beyond the boundaries of the park and to its context in the broader community. The illustration in Figure 3-11 highlights several key community development opportunities: ► The City must create connections between the park and other sections of Monticello. ► Building streets in a "parkway" design emphasizes the desired qualities of a regional park and of the surrounding Places to Live and Work. ► The park is a critical piece in creating a "greenway" system that links to the Mississippi River and may, ► Where should the interchange be located? over time, ring the community. ► What is the potential for a new river bridge Industrial Growth connection? ► How would the interchange be funded and what are the financial and land use implications for the City? The Northwest area is a critical location for current and future industrial development. The Monticello Business Center, located south of Chelsea Road and west of 90th ► What time frame should be used in planning for Street, has already started to be developed as a high the improvements? amenity environment with protective covenants that The answers to these questions provide invaluable guidance to future land use and transportation in Monticello. The area included in future planning address building materials, loading docks, outdoor storage, and landscaping. In order to provide sufficient land for Business Campus uses over the next 25 years, 3-18 1 Land Use City of Monticello Existing Natural ,` ~ Land/," Pot( Grei rj Cori V S Figure 3-11: Community Connections to Regional Park :ial Parkways Jo Mississippi River Existing Green Corridor the Comprehensive Plan extends this land use south to of this roadway should be identified and preserved as the planned expansion of School Boulevard. development occurs. It is important to recognize that activity generated by business development can create conflicts with residential development. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create both high quality business parks and residential neighborhoods in this area. Careful site planning and development management will be needed to meet these objectives. School Boulevard Extension The Northwest Area serves as a good example of the need to coordination land use and transportation planning. An extension of School Boulevard is needed to provide access to the area and to connect development to the rest of the community. The route School Boulevard has several other Comprehensive Plan implications: ► This major collector street will influence the nature of adjacent land use. ► Streetscape improvements would help to define the high quality character desired by the City as a gateway to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park and to new neighborhoods. ► The street is a means for bringing trail connections to the park. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-19 Golf Course In 2006, the Silver Springs Golf Course was part of a development proposal (Jefferson at Monticello) that would have redeveloped this property mixing golf and housing. The development did not proceed beyond the environmental review. The Comprehensive Plan shows the area as Places to Recreate based on the continued use as a golf course. This designation does not preclude a future proposal and Comprehensive Plan amendment for residential development. It is likely, however, that this scale of new development will require the access provided by a new highway interchange. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to fill in other development areas and make effective use of other infrastructure investments before extending utilities for redevelopment of the golf course. Downtown Focus Area Downtown Monticello needs special attention in the Comprehensive Plan. Following the 2008 Comprehensive Plan update, the community undertook a separate downtown planning process. This process resulted in the Embracing Downtown Plan. In 2017, recognizing the changes in the retail marketplace, and more specifically market changes and investments in the Downtown, the City engaged the community in a planning effort for the core blocks of the Downtown. On September 25, 2017, the City adopted a Downtown Small Area Plan, which provides guidance for the downtown, including the core blocks and extending to include the full Downtown Central Community District (CCD). The Plan emphasizes the importance that the community places on Downtown. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update relies on the Downtown Small Area Plan as a guide for public and private actions in the Downtown area. Revitalizing and sustaining Downtown Monticello requires a collaborative effort of the City, businesses, property owners and other stakeholders. Planning for the future of the Downtown must recognize the practical realities facing commercial development in Downtown: ► The configuration and traffic volumes of Highway 25 significantly reduce opportunities for direct access from the Highway to adjacent properties. ► Traffic volumes on Highway 25 will continue to increase. Greater volumes and congestion act as an impediment for people living south of I-94 coming to Downtown. ► There is no controlled intersection on Highway 25 between Broadway and 7th Street. The lack of a controlled intersection combined with traffic volumes make pedestrian connections between Downtown and residential areas to the east very difficult. ► "Big box" and retail development continue to occur in other parts of Monticello. These businesses directly compete with the Downtown and attract smaller businesses (that might otherwise consider a Downtown location) to adjacent parcels. Downtown Goals ► Improve Pine Street for all users. ► Shift the center of Downtown to Broadway and Walnut Streets ► Encourage Small and Medium Scaled Investments ► Become a River Town Land Use ► Create a Center to Downtown that is active throughout the day and into the evening — year- round. The Walnut / Broadway Intersection should become the heart of this area. ► Improve connections to the River by locating uses that benefit from open spaces and activities associated with the River. ► Improve the entry experience from the north. ► Maintain a shopfront District along Broadway, west of Pine Street comprised of traditional main street (mercantile) buildings that have retail/restaurant space on the ground floor and housing or offices above. ► Create a development pattern on Pine Street that benefits from high visibility and regional access. ► Infill Walnut Street and Cedar Street with mid - scale housing (2-4 stories) that creates an effective transition between the in -town neighborhoods and the Downtown. 3-20 1 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-12: Land Use and Development Framework from the Downtown Small Area Plan 7 i Enu kw-!rr Yv! ui. DV..i:y Ha W r,j Transportation ► Connect Walnut Street to River Street ► Maintain the River Street / Pine Street signal as the formal entrance to Downtown and an important pedestrian connection across Pine Street. ► Add a traffic signal at 4th and Pine to help balance the grid and turning movements at the Pine / Broadway Intersection. ► Modify Walnut / Broadway and Cedar / Walnut Broadway intersection to prioritize pedestrian crossings and access to the river. ► Narrow the travel lanes on Walnut Street, add parking where possible and ensure continuous safe and pleasant sidewalks. ► Add sidewalks at the perimeter of blocks where they are not currently present. ► Discourage direct property access to Pine Street; favoring the side streets wherever possible with through -block lanes or easements. ► Allow direct property access to Block 52 from Pine Street in order to reduce volumes at the Pine / Broadway intersection. ► Consider traffic calming at River Street and Locust (or Linn) to prevent excessive speeds - similar to River Street and Cedar Street as an example. Open Space and Parks ► Redesign East and West Bridge park to include an amphitheater, water feature, riverfront access, 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-21 picnicking, and additional space for passive park use. ► Improve Front Street Park to include improved boat landing and space for nature oriented programming. ► Connect the two Bridge Parks with Front Street Park with improved pathways and trails. Design all three parks as a single park with multiple uses. ► Provide access to the islands with a seasonal bridge ► Create small pocket parks mid -block on Broadway to offer plazas that connect to parking lots in the middle of the block. ► Redesign Walnut Street between River Street and Broadway as a special street that can be closed and used for festivals and events throughout the year. ► Consider all sidewalks for opportunities to enhance greenery and public art. Emphasize Walnut Street, River Street and Broadway as the main pedestrian corridors in Downtown. ► Use public art throughout the parks and corridors to distinguish Downtown as a place of cultural expression and celebration. ► Work closely with local businesses, residents (new and existing) to ensure local parks and open spaces are appropriately designed and programmed for their varied needs. ► Create north / south bike access to the river along Walnut and Cedar through a complete streets policy. Encourage bicycle crossing of Pine Street at 4th, River and 7th Street. Downtown Design and Image ► The Downtown Small Area Plan provides guidance for the core blocks of the Downtown. Where the Downtown Small Area Plan does not provide specific design guidance, the City's zoning ordinance will guide design and image. South Central Focus Area Continued residential growth to the south is an important element of the Comprehensive Plan. This growth achieves several objectives: ► It helps to facilitate the expansion of the sanitary sewer system in conjunction with the reconstruction of Fallon Avenue. This sanitary sewer capacity is The Comprehensive Plan seeks to enhance the existing commercial core along Broadway by building strong connections with the riverfront and the civic/retail district on the south end of Walnut Street The current end of Walnut Street is a barrier to improving connections between Downtown and the riverfront. needed to support future industrial growth area along Highway 25. ► These areas encourage growth in areas that could use the new eastern interchange with I-94 rather than Highway 25. ► These areas provide appropriate locations for continued growth in entry-level single family homes and medium density housing types. These Places to Live are important elements of maintaining an adequately diverse housing stock. 3-22 1 Land Use City of Monticello ► Orderly expansion to the south moves development towards area of higher natural amenity. Areas along the southern edge of the Orderly Annexation Area provide another location for potential "move up" housing. A key to development in this focus area is the construction of the Fallon Avenue bridge. The bridge leads to the reconstruction of Fallon Avenue and the related expansion of municipal sanitary sewer and water systems. Future development will be limited without additional utility capacity. East Focus Area The Comprehensive Plan places greater priority on growth to the west and south. Development should be directed to areas that most effectively achieve the objectives of this Plan. Several factors could cause the City to encourage future residential development in the East Focus Area: ► Increased overall housing demand that exceeds the capacity to support growth in other areas. ► Traffic congestion on Highway 25 that increases the need to channel use to the east interchange. ► The need to solve stormwater and drainage management issues (Ditch 33) in this area. Solving drainage issues allows eastward expansion along County Road 18. Future growth in the east should continue to fill in the development area within the Orderly Annexation Area on the east side of Monticello. The natural features in these areas allow for higher amenity neighborhoods. This growth can occur with new collector/arterial street corridors. Figure 3-13: Land Use Plan - South Central Figure 3-14: Land Use Plan - East Focus Area 2008 Comprehensive Plan – Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-23 WSB Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who participated in the development of the Monticello Housing Study, including the Monticello City staff, Wright County Assessor's Office and the various realtors in the community. Completed in coordination with: A BWSB & Associates, Inc. 1 I Page A MontiUcello WSB PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF RESEARCH Housing is an important component of all communities. Housing quality, availability, affordability and diversity enhances the quality of life, supports economic development, and contributes to a community's sense of place. WSB & Associates, Inc. was engaged by the City of Monticello to conduct a Housing Study to assess the housing market conditions and provide recommendations for housing needs within the City of Monticello. The market analysis focused on the housing needs within the City of Monticello including market rate, subsidized, and move - up housing for various age categories including owner -occupied and renter occupied housing options. Monticello's Housing Market Study ("Study") should be used as a reference to guide planning efforts, financial initiatives and strategies, and provide direction to the City regarding the approach it should take; the types of housing opportunities the City should promote, and the roles in providing those opportunities. This Study is intended to be flexible to meet unforeseen housing needs and future land use decisions. It should be noted that the findings presented in this report should not be used to determine the market feasibility of any single development or project; rather, it is designed to be abroad analysis of the entire Monticello housing market and is intended to guide planning efforts, especially as they relate to future land use designations. The Study contains data from both primary and secondary research. Primary research includes interviews with local officials, and the real estate community. Secondary research data includes data from the US Census, American Community Survey, Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), Wright County, Business Analyst', and other local planning agencies. Secondary research is always used as a basis for analysis and is carefully reviewed along with other factors that may impact projections. All the information on pending developments was gathered by WSB & Associates, Inc. and is accurate to the best of our knowledge. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS This section looks at the demographic characteristics that underlie the need for various types of housing in Monticello. The U.S. Census and Business Analyst served as the primary sources for the demographic overview. While population projections are an effective planning tool when used correctly, their accuracy is dependent on several factors including assumptions for birth rates, death rates, migration, and economic conditions. Assumptions are based on past trends and the best information available at the time, but assumptions do not always remain true, and unexpected changes can occur. Therefore, Monticello should use the population projections presented in this Market Study as a general guide and not as an absolute certainty. Moreover, the City should periodically review and update the population projections based upon new conditions. WSB & Associates, Inc. determined the Study Area to be used as comparison points. The area was based on geographic and man-made boundaries, community orientation, our knowledge of the area, and the dictates of the proposal. Considering these factors, we determined a Study Area to include the cities of Monticello, Big Lake, Buffalo, Elk River, Becker, and Rogers. In addition, Wright County and the State ' Business Analyst is a data processing service that uses ESRI technology, U.S. Census data, and American Community Survey data. 2 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB of Minnesota are also included as part of the analysis in the report. Though outside the scope of this report, it is important to note that surrounding communities' populations and available housing stock may affect Monticello's housing market. Figure 1: City of Monticello, MN HISTORIC POPULATION CHANGE The total population of Monticello has grown substantially since the 1980s. Between 1980 and 2010, the City has grown by 597% adding 10,929 new residents, accounting for 18% of the study areas total growth. During the last U.S. Census period (2000-2010), Monticello saw a 38% growth with the addition of 4,891 new residents. Please refer to Table 1-A for further details. 3 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSS Table 1-A: POPULATION CHANGE 1980.2010 Monticello's age distribution has remained relatively consistent from 2000 to 2010 with the largest age group being 25 to 34 in both census periods. The percentage of people 19 and younger decreased from 33.7% to 32.8% while the percentage of those 65 and older increased from 8.9% to 9.8%. Keeping with national trends, the median age increased in Monticello from 2000 to 2010 from 29.8 to 31.6. Please refer to Table 2-A for further details. Table 2-A: MONTICELLO HISTORIC AGE DEMOGRAPHICS 2000-2010 2000 2010 Change Number % Number US Census Total Population 1980-1990 100.0 1990-2000 2000-2010 Under 5 years Place 1980 1990 2000 2010 No. % No. % No. % Monticello 1,830 4,941 7,868 12,759 3,111 170.0% 2,927 59.2% 4,891 62.2% Big Lake 2,210 3,113 6,063 10,060 903 40.9% 2,950 94.8% 3,997 65.9% Buffalo 4,560 6,856 10,097 15,453 2,296 50.4% 3,241 47.3% 5,356 53.0% Elk River I 6,785 11,143 16,447 22,974 4,358 64.2% 5,304 47.6% 6,527 39.7% Becker I 601 902 2,673 4,538 301 50.1% 1,771 196.3% 1,865 69.8% Rogers 652 698 3,588 11,197 46 7.1% 2,890 414.0% 7,609 212.1 Study Area 16,638 27,653 46,736 76,981 11,015 66.2% 19,083 69.0% 30,245 64.7% Total Wright County 58,681 68,710 89,986 124,700 10,029 17.10% 21,276 30.90% 34,714 38.50 Minnesota 3,806,10 4,075,907 4,375,09 4,919,47 269,804 7.10% 299,19 7.30% 544,38 12.40 3 9 9 2 0 % Source: U.S. Census Bureau Monticello's age distribution has remained relatively consistent from 2000 to 2010 with the largest age group being 25 to 34 in both census periods. The percentage of people 19 and younger decreased from 33.7% to 32.8% while the percentage of those 65 and older increased from 8.9% to 9.8%. Keeping with national trends, the median age increased in Monticello from 2000 to 2010 from 29.8 to 31.6. Please refer to Table 2-A for further details. 4 1 P a g e A �01[�o WSB Table 2-A: MONTICELLO HISTORIC AGE DEMOGRAPHICS 2000-2010 2000 2010 Number % Number % Total Population 7,868 100.0 12759 100.0 Under 5 years 799 10.2 1292 10.1 5 to 9 years 725 9.2 1101 8.6 10 to 14 years 610 7.8 969 7.6 15 to 19 years 511 6.5 823 6.5 20 to 24 years 547 7 731 5.7 25 to 34 years 1,571 20 2255 17.7 35 to 44 years 1,215 15.4 1991 15.6 45 to 54 years 719 9.1 1505 11.8 55 to 59 years 271 3.4 490 7.0 60 to 64 years 202 2.6 395 3.1 65 to 74 years 316 4 584 5.0 75 to 84 years I 260 3.3 394 3.0 85 years and over 122 1.6 229 1.8 Median age (years) 29.8 (X) 31.4 ( X ) Source: U.S. Census Bureau 4 1 P a g e A �01[�o WSB POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS Population projections are an effective planning tool when used correctly. They are based upon assumptions for birth rates, death rates, migration, and economic conditions. In 2010, the U.S. Census reported Monticello's population as 12,759. Monticello's estimated population was 13,568 in 2016, and is projected to increase to 14,383 in 2021. Again, it is impossible to know with certainty what Monticello's future population will be, but it is reasonable to believe that any future population increases resulting from new housing development or redevelopment in Monticello will be offset (to some extent) by population trends resulting from an aging population and diminishing household size. However, based on available data, Monticello's population will likely see a continued increase through year 2021. It is anticipated that Monticello will account for 18.8% of the Study Area's population growth between 2016 and 2021. Monticello's expected rate of population change is roughly equal to the County and double the State. Refer to Table 1-B: Projected Population Change: 2010-2021 for additional information. The City of Monticello has developed its own projections based on building permits and certificates of occupancy over the past two years. The Minnesota State Demographer's 2015 Annual estimate was utilized as base reference point. It indicated the City had 13,311 residents at the end of 2014. During the 2015-2016 time -frame, the City issued permits for 307 additional housing units. Using ESRI's estimated household size of 2.72, this yields an estimated population of 14,146 at the end of 2016. In recognition of the trend of increasing household size and the moderate pace of new residential development and household formation in the City, the projections for the 2017-2021 period indicate an increase of 893 people (2.74 persons per 326 new units or 65 +/- units per year). The annual population increase of 179 is sixteen (16) people higher than ESRI's annual projections based on U.S. Census Bureau data estimates. Again, ESRI's figures appear to have under -accounted for the sizeable number of new units in the community during 2015-2016. Basically, ESRI does not factor in the steady recovery in building permit issuance in this period and applies its projections to a lower beginning population figure than a more realistic number. Refer to Tables 1-C and 2-C for more information. 5 1 P a g e A Monticello WSB TABLE 1-13: PROJECTED POPULATION CHANGE: 2010.2021 Change U.S. Census Bureau 2010.2016 2016-2021 Place 2010 2016 2021 No. F No. % Monticello I 12,759 13,568 14,383 -% 809 6.3% 815 6.0% Big Lake I 10,060 10,629 11,080 569 0 5.7% 1 451 4.2% Buffalo I 15,453 16,093 16,699 640 4.1% 606 3.8% Elk River 22,974 23,984 24,891 1,010 4.4% 907 3.8% Becker I 4,538 4,858 5,253 320 7.1% 395 8.1% Rogers 11,197 12,675 13,844 1,478 13.2% i 1,169 9.2% Study Area Total 76,981 81,807 86,150 4,826 6.3% 4,343 5.3% Wright County 124,700 132,801 140,895 8,101 6.5% 8,094 6.1% Minnesota 4,919,479 5,541,669 5,720,647 622,190 12.6% 178,978 3.2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The City of Monticello has developed its own projections based on building permits and certificates of occupancy over the past two years. The Minnesota State Demographer's 2015 Annual estimate was utilized as base reference point. It indicated the City had 13,311 residents at the end of 2014. During the 2015-2016 time -frame, the City issued permits for 307 additional housing units. Using ESRI's estimated household size of 2.72, this yields an estimated population of 14,146 at the end of 2016. In recognition of the trend of increasing household size and the moderate pace of new residential development and household formation in the City, the projections for the 2017-2021 period indicate an increase of 893 people (2.74 persons per 326 new units or 65 +/- units per year). The annual population increase of 179 is sixteen (16) people higher than ESRI's annual projections based on U.S. Census Bureau data estimates. Again, ESRI's figures appear to have under -accounted for the sizeable number of new units in the community during 2015-2016. Basically, ESRI does not factor in the steady recovery in building permit issuance in this period and applies its projections to a lower beginning population figure than a more realistic number. Refer to Tables 1-C and 2-C for more information. 5 1 P a g e A Monticello WSB TABLE 1-C: MONTICELLO HOUSING PERMITS & POPULATION FORECAST CALCULATIONS Year: Single -Family Single -Family Multifamily Total ' Detached Attached 2010 2 0 0 2 2011 2 0 0 2 2012 22 0 0 22 2013 49 3 0 = 52 2014 70 3 0 73 2015 38 6 136 180 2016 61 0 66 127 Average Total 244 12 202 458 65.2 per year POPULATION FORECAST CALCULATIONS Time -Frame New Housing Average HH Size New Residents 2014 Pop End of 2016 Pop Units (Permits x HH Size) 2015-2016 307 2.72 835 13,311 14,146 Time -Frame New Housing Average HH Size New Residents 2016 Pop End of 2021 Pop Units (Permits x HH Size) 2017-2021 326 (65.2 x 5) 2.74 893 14,146 15,039 Source: City of Monticello, Minnesota State Demographer TABLE 2-C: POPULATION PROJECTION DIFFERENCE 2016 2021 Annual Growth City of Monticello 14,146 15,039 179 ESRI 13,568 14,383 163 Difference 578 656 16 Source: ESRI forecasts, The City of Monticello HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS AND FORECASTS In 2010, the US Census reported 4,693 households in Monticello and 3,164 families. A household refers to a housing unit occupied by at least one person. A household can involve a family living in a housing unit or it can involve unrelated people sharing an apartment or housing unit. A family refers to a household consisting of a householder and one or more other people related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. In the future, it is likely that the percentage of married couples without children living with them will increase. The percentage of single parent households will also increase. Family households with no spouse present accounted for approximately 30% of the family households in Monticello in 2010. The average household size in Monticello in 2000 was 2.64 persons compared to 2.68 in 2010 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. These figures were projected to increase, according to ESRI, to 2.72 in 2016 and 2.74 by 2021. According to the American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, Monticello has seen a decrease in family households, a decrease in households with children under the age of 18, and an increase in non -family households (see Table 1-D: Household Occupancy Characteristics for further details). These trends held true from 2009-2014 aside from an outlying year (2014 - highlighted in gray on Table 1-D) when there was an increase in family households, an increase in families with children, and a decrease in nonfamily households. This may have been caused by an increased availability of single- family housing units. These trends have implications for the demand of future housing types in Monticello. Since the average household size is projected to decrease and the trend of family households has been decreasing, a shift in demand will likely occur less for 3-4 bedroom, single-family homes and more for smaller housing units, and multi -family units. 6 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB TABLE 1-D: HOUSEHOLD OCCUPANCY CHARACTERISTICS - 2009.2014 Source: American Community Survey 5 -year Estimates Between 2010 and 2016, the number of new households (4,693 and 4,936 respectively) has grown proportionally to the increase in population (12,759 and 13,568 respectively) suggesting stability in household size (see Table I -E: Historic and Projected Households: 2010-2021). The number of households in Monticello is projected to increase by 5.3% by 2021 accounting for 18.2% of the study area's projected household growth. TABLE 1-E: HISTORIC AND PROJECTED HOUSEHOLDS: 2010-2021 Change Family Family with Children Nonfamily 1 -person _ 2 -person 3 -person 4 -or -more -person 2009 72.2% 47.0% 27.8% 22.0% 29.8% 18.8% 29.4% 2010 69.6% 46.4% 30.4% 25.1% 25.8% 18.6% 30.6% 2011 68.5% 45.3% 31.5% 25.8% 26.9% 16.9% 30.9% 2012 66.8% 43.8% 33.2% 26.5% 25.3% 19.1% 29.1% 2013 ' 66.2% 42.3% 33.8% 27.0% 27.0% 16.4% 29.6% 2014 68.8 43. 1,635 1,772 109 7.1% 137 1 Rogers 3,748 Source: American Community Survey 5 -year Estimates Between 2010 and 2016, the number of new households (4,693 and 4,936 respectively) has grown proportionally to the increase in population (12,759 and 13,568 respectively) suggesting stability in household size (see Table I -E: Historic and Projected Households: 2010-2021). The number of households in Monticello is projected to increase by 5.3% by 2021 accounting for 18.2% of the study area's projected household growth. TABLE 1-E: HISTORIC AND PROJECTED HOUSEHOLDS: 2010-2021 Change *The 200 occupied units of the new IRET Apartment Complex were accounted for here. Note: There is potential for household growth to exceed these projections based on the housing market's recovery from the Great Recession. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts, WSB & Associates 7 1 P a g e A Monticello WSB US Census 2010-2016 2016-2021 Place 2010 2016 2021 No. % No. % Monticello 4,693 5,136* 5,399 443* 8.6% 263 4.9% Big Lake 3,377 3,566 3,720 189 ' 5.6% 154 4.3% Buffalo 5,700 5,872 6,058 172 3.0% 186 3.2% Elk River 8,080 8,452 8,780 372 4.6% 328 3.9% Becker 1,526 1,635 1,772 109 7.1% 137 8.4% Rogers 3,748 4,232 4,610 484 12.9% 378 8.9% Study Area Total 27,124 28,893 30,339 1,769 6.1% 1,446 4.8% Wright County 44,473 46,817 49,383 2,344 5.3% 2,566 5.5% Minnesota 2,087,227 2,176,475 2,258,733 89,248 4.3% 82,258 3.8% *The 200 occupied units of the new IRET Apartment Complex were accounted for here. Note: There is potential for household growth to exceed these projections based on the housing market's recovery from the Great Recession. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts, WSB & Associates 7 1 P a g e A Monticello WSB AGE COMPOSITION & IMPACT ON HOUSING In addition to knowing how many people currently live and will likely live in Monticello, an understanding of the population's age composition can help the City plan for and provide necessary and desired services for its residents. The following provides an overview of the existing age composition of Monticello's residents and the anticipated changes in age composition that will occur through the year 2021 (see Table 1-F: Age Composition 2010-2021). Composition will remain relatively consistent outside of a slight decrease in the 25-34 age category (by 2.1%) and slight increase in the 55-64 age category (by 2.5%) which reflects aging baby boomers and a smaller succeeding generation. Extrapolating further past year 2021, Monticello can expect a surge of 7,438 residents entering the over - sixty -five (65) age group as is indicated by the red box in Table I -F. The age cohort closest to age sixty- five (65) typically is comfortable downsizing their living situation. This is a substantial number of households who will be causing the demand in housing types to change in Monticello for future years as current projections do not have a corresponding offset in future age groups. TABLE 1-F: AGE COMPOSITION 2010-2021 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts HOUSING SUPPLY Number and Types of Housing Units The US Census indicates that there were 4,693 households in Monticello in 2010: 1,749 more units than identified in 2000 (2,944). Data describing the household type, as shown below in Table I -E, was only available as an estimate. The most recent data is from the 2014 American Community Survey. Roughly, 54.5% of the housing units in 2014 were single-family detached houses: this is considerably lower than Wright County (76.4%) and lower than the State of Minnesota (67.2%). In 2014, roughly 18.2% of the housing units in Monticello were single-family attached units (townhouses): this is almost double the figure for Wright County (9.8%) and much higher than the State (7.5%). In 2014, the City also had a considerably higher percentage of multi -family housing than Wright County but was consistent with the State of Minnesota. Refer to Table I -G: Housing Supply by Type - 2014, for more information. 8 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSS 2010 2016 2021 Age I Number % Number % Number % Age 0-4 I 1,292 10.1% 1,206 8.90% 1,293 9.00% Age 5-9 I 1,101 8.6% 1,150 8.50% 1,226 8.50% Age 10 -14 I 969 7.6% 1,033 7.60% 1,163 8.10% Age 15 -19 I 823 6.5% 924 6.80% 949 6.60% Age 20 - 24 I 731 5.7% 901 6.60% 903 6.30% Age 25 - 34 I 2,255 17.7% 1,968 14.50% 2,246 15.60% Age 35 - 44 I 1,991 15.6% 2,065 15.20% 2,157 15.00% Age 45 - 54 I 1,505 11.8% 1,771 13.10% 1,682 11.70% Age 55 - 64 I 885 6.9% 1,240 9.10% 1353 9.40% Age 65 - 74 584 4.6% 751 5.50% 836 5.80% Age 75 - 84 394 3.1% 372 ' 2.70% 404 2.80% Age 85+ 229 1.8% 185 1.40% 171 1.20% Median Age 31.6 33.1 32.3 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts HOUSING SUPPLY Number and Types of Housing Units The US Census indicates that there were 4,693 households in Monticello in 2010: 1,749 more units than identified in 2000 (2,944). Data describing the household type, as shown below in Table I -E, was only available as an estimate. The most recent data is from the 2014 American Community Survey. Roughly, 54.5% of the housing units in 2014 were single-family detached houses: this is considerably lower than Wright County (76.4%) and lower than the State of Minnesota (67.2%). In 2014, roughly 18.2% of the housing units in Monticello were single-family attached units (townhouses): this is almost double the figure for Wright County (9.8%) and much higher than the State (7.5%). In 2014, the City also had a considerably higher percentage of multi -family housing than Wright County but was consistent with the State of Minnesota. Refer to Table I -G: Housing Supply by Type - 2014, for more information. 8 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSS Housing Type Single -Family Detached Single -Family Attached 2-4 Unit Multi - Family 5+ Unit Multi - Family Mobile Home Other Total Units Source: 2010-2014, TABLE 1-G: HOUSING SUPPLY BY TYPE - 2014 Monticello Monticello Wright County Wright County State State Units % Units % Units % 2,663 54.5% 889 18.2% 123 2.5% 787 16.1% 422 8.6% - 0.0% 4,884 100% 4medcan Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates 37,715 76.4% 1,589,773 67.2% 4,863 9.8% 176,173 7.5% 799 1.6% 104,411 4.4% 3,609 7.3% 410,648 17.4% 2,335 4.7% 82,441 3.5% 50 0.1% 703 0.0% 49,371 100% 2,364,149 100% Comparison and Forecast of Owner -Occupied and Renter -Occupied Units It is important to have a balance of owner -occupied and renter -occupied units. In general, many communities strive to have roughly 65-70% of their housing units owner -occupied and 30-35% renter occupied. In 2010, approximately 68% of the housing units in Monticello were owner -occupied; this is slightly lower than Wright County (75%), and about the same as the State of Minnesota (68%). During 2016, the City of Monticello's housing occupancy ratio (owner: renter) has changed slightly, with 69% of the housing units being owner occupied and 25% being renter occupied. In 2021, the housing occupancy ratio is forecasted to remain consistent with past trends. Refer to Table 1-H.• Housing Tenure by Type - 2010, for additional information. Please be aware that there is roughly a 6% gap between owner occupied housing units and renter occupied housing units; this gap will be addressed in the following section. TABLE 1-H: HOUSING TENURE - 2010 - 2021 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts Vacancies Today, the City of Monticello faces an overall housing vacancy rate of 6.0%, which is 3.4% lower than the vacancy rate for Wright County, and 5.2% lower than that of the State. Monticello's vacancy rate has increased by 0.4% since 2010 and is projected to increase by 1% in 2021 which will still be significantly lower than the County and State. Both the County and State are projected to remain consistent through year 2021. The increase of vacant housing units in Monticello can partly be explained by the fact that the number of housing units in the City increased by nearly 6% from 2010-2016, and the housing market experienced a significant decline. Please see Table 1-1 for further details. 9 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB Owner Occupied Housing Units % Renter Occupied Housing Units % Location: 2010 2016 2021 2010 2016 2021 Monticello I 68.2% 68.7% 68.1% 26.2% 25.3% 24.9% Wright County 75.8% 74.7% 74.7% 14.9% 15.8% 15.9% State of MN 64.9% 64.0% 63.9% 24.0% 24.8% 24.9% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts Vacancies Today, the City of Monticello faces an overall housing vacancy rate of 6.0%, which is 3.4% lower than the vacancy rate for Wright County, and 5.2% lower than that of the State. Monticello's vacancy rate has increased by 0.4% since 2010 and is projected to increase by 1% in 2021 which will still be significantly lower than the County and State. Both the County and State are projected to remain consistent through year 2021. The increase of vacant housing units in Monticello can partly be explained by the fact that the number of housing units in the City increased by nearly 6% from 2010-2016, and the housing market experienced a significant decline. Please see Table 1-1 for further details. 9 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The rental housing average vacancy rate is low in Monticello but is projected to increase indicating a demand for addition rental units at all levels of affordability. Table 2-1 indicates specific vacancy rates for eight of the rental properties in the City. TABLE 1-I: VACANT HOUSING FORCAST & COMPARISION — 2010.2021 RENTAL APARTMENTS — VACANCIES AND RATES Year City Vacant Units City Percent Vacant County Percent Vacant State Percent Vacant 2010 280 5.6% 9.2% 11.1% 2016 315 6.0% 9.4% 11.2% 2021 391 7.0% 9.4% 11.2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The rental housing average vacancy rate is low in Monticello but is projected to increase indicating a demand for addition rental units at all levels of affordability. Table 2-1 indicates specific vacancy rates for eight of the rental properties in the City. * 202 -unit IRET Apartment Complex built in 2016 Source: WSB & Associates Phone Interviews Value of Housing The median value of owner -occupied housing units in Monticello in 2016 was $179,095 and is projected to increase by $30,314 in 2021. Most housing in Monticello is valued in the range of $150,000 to $199,999, which is consistent with the County and State. In comparison to low and moderate valued housing, there is a relatively limited choice of higher valued housing units in Monticello. Only 16.5% of owner -occupied housing units have a value of $250,000 or greater compared to 38.8% in the County and 36.7% in the State. The median value of owner -occupied housing in Wright County was $216,395 and $205,288 in the State of Minnesota. Monticello needs to focus on later -stage housing opportunities to meet the demand for higher valued housing units. Refer to Table I -J.• Owner -Occupied Housing by Value -2016 for additional information. Table 24 illustrates the affect that the Great Recession had on housing values in Monticello. Note that median sale price fell below median appraised value in mid -2007, then recovered and surpassed appraised value in 201 Ito regain a more traditional relationship. Data from Table 24 came from the Wright County Assessor. Monticello lO1Page WSB TABLE 2-I: RENTAL APARTMENTS — VACANCIES AND RATES I Vacancy Rates Ridgemont Apartments 1 0.0% $566-$610 River Park View Apartments 0.0% 30% of income Ridgway Apartments 2.3% $460-$725 Hillside Terrace 0.0% 30% of income Cedar Crest Apartments 0.0% 30% of income Broadway Square 0.0% 30% of income 7th Street Townhomes 6.7% $825 Monticello Crossings* 1.0% $925 - $2,210 Monticello Village 3.3% $1,018 — $1,610 Average Vacancy Rate 1.5% * 202 -unit IRET Apartment Complex built in 2016 Source: WSB & Associates Phone Interviews Value of Housing The median value of owner -occupied housing units in Monticello in 2016 was $179,095 and is projected to increase by $30,314 in 2021. Most housing in Monticello is valued in the range of $150,000 to $199,999, which is consistent with the County and State. In comparison to low and moderate valued housing, there is a relatively limited choice of higher valued housing units in Monticello. Only 16.5% of owner -occupied housing units have a value of $250,000 or greater compared to 38.8% in the County and 36.7% in the State. The median value of owner -occupied housing in Wright County was $216,395 and $205,288 in the State of Minnesota. Monticello needs to focus on later -stage housing opportunities to meet the demand for higher valued housing units. Refer to Table I -J.• Owner -Occupied Housing by Value -2016 for additional information. Table 24 illustrates the affect that the Great Recession had on housing values in Monticello. Note that median sale price fell below median appraised value in mid -2007, then recovered and surpassed appraised value in 201 Ito regain a more traditional relationship. Data from Table 24 came from the Wright County Assessor. Monticello lO1Page WSB TABLE 1-J: OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING BY VALUE - 2016 Value I City Units City % Wright County % State % i Less than $50,000 I 411 11.4% 6.5% 6.5% $50,000 to $99,999 I 240 6.7% 4.8% 9.4% $100,000 to $149,999 I 407 11.3% 11.8% 14.7% $150,000 to $199,999 I 1282 35.5% 21.4% 17.9% $200,000 to $249,999 li 672 18.6% 16.7% 14.7% $250,000 to $299,999 I 269 7.5% 11.5% 10.3% $300,000 to $399,999 I 217 6.0% 13.2% 12.2% $400,000 to $499,99 I 65 1.8% 6.4% 6.1% $500,000 to $749,999 I 18 0.5% 4.5% 4.9% $750,000 to $999,999 I 22 0.6% 1.8% 1.9% $1,000,000 or More 5 0.1% 1.4% 1.3% Median Value $179,095 I $216,395 $205,288 Source: ESRI Forecasts CHART 24 MONTICELLO HOUSING VALUES THOUGH THE GREAT RECESSION $210,000 $200,000 $190,000 $180,000 $170,000 $160,000 $150,000 $140,000 $130,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Median Sale Median Appraised Owner Monthly Costs as Percentage of Household Income Housing decisions should not be based solely on the value of housing, but also the cost of housing expenses in relation to household income. In general, housing costs (taxes, insurance, principal, interest, etc.) should not exceed 30% of total household income. In 2014, only 19% of homeowners in Monticello had monthly costs that were more than 30% of their household income, compared to 27% in Wright County and 29% in the State of Minnesota (see Table 1-K• Owner Monthly Costs as Percent of Household Income -2014). These figures suggest that housing was more affordable in Monticello than in Wright County and the State of Minnesota in 2014 possibly due to age and livability of housing units. This is an important strength for the City as it continues to grow and evolve into a regional center linking the Twin Cities Metro with the St. Cloud MSA. Monticello should consider a goal to maintain appropriate amounts of affordable housing to mitigate the negative impacts of a housing price correction like that seen during the Great Recession (2007-2010). This will allow for the community to see steady and modestly increasing home values and reduce the 11 I Page A MontiUcello WSS likelihood of rapidly increasing home prices causing homeowners to be required to spend a larger portion of their income on housing. While the provision of affordable housing is one side of the coin, the City should also incorporate a plan to encourage the development and attraction of livable wage employment opportunities in the City. TABLE 1-K: OWNER MONTHLY COSTS AS PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME - 2014 Percent of Household Income Less than 20% 20.0 to 24.9% 25.0 to 29.9% 30.0 to 34.9% 35.0% or More Total Source: 2010-2014 American Con City Units* City % County % State % 1,286 47.0% 39.0% 41.3% 611 22.3% rr 18.9% 17.8% 611 11.4% 14.8% 12.3% 169 6.2% 7.6% 7.9% 361 13.2% 19.6% 20.8% 2,738 100% 100% 100% munity Survey *Housing Units with a Mortgage 24,764 4.2% Contract Rent In 2014, rental housing units accounted for roughly 25% of the occupied housing units in Monticello. In 2014, roughly 88% of units had a monthly rent of $500 or more, which is higher than Wright County (87%), and the State of Minnesota (79%). See Table I -L: Renter -Occupied Housing Units by Gross Rent - 2010, for additional information. Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey Renter Monthly Costs as Percentage of Household Income In 2014, 46.5% of renters paid over 30% of their household income in rent (see Table I -M.• Gross Rent as Percent of Household Income - 2014). This number is slightly lower than Wright County (47.7%) but higher than the State of Minnesota (46.1 %). This suggests that there is not an abundance of affordable rental units in Monticello and efforts should be made to decrease rental costs. MontiUcello 121Page WSB TABLE 1-L: RENTER -OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY GROSS RENT - 2014 City County State Monthly Rent Units % Units % Units % Less than $200 23 2.0% 141 2.0% 24,764 4.2% $200 to $299 57 4.9% 233 3.3% 31,166 5.3% $300 to $499 66 5.6% 582 8.2% 68,601 11.6% $500 to $749 367 31.2% 2136 30.1% 159,802 27.1% $750 to $999 322 27.4% 2012 28.3% 139,386 23.6% $1000 to $1,499 306 26.0% 1514 21.3% 105,182 17.8% $1,500 or more 34 2.9% 188 2.6% 34,297 5.8% No Rent Paid 0 0.0% 300 4.2% 27,938 4.7% Median Rent Paid $773 $778 $747 Total Specified Units 1,175 100% 7,106 100% 590,136 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey Renter Monthly Costs as Percentage of Household Income In 2014, 46.5% of renters paid over 30% of their household income in rent (see Table I -M.• Gross Rent as Percent of Household Income - 2014). This number is slightly lower than Wright County (47.7%) but higher than the State of Minnesota (46.1 %). This suggests that there is not an abundance of affordable rental units in Monticello and efforts should be made to decrease rental costs. MontiUcello 121Page WSB TABLE 1-M: GROSS RENT AS A PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME - 2014 Percent of Household Income Monticello Units Units Percent Wright County State 1990 to 1999 I 1,277 1980 to 1989 I 748 1970 to 1979 I 654 Less than 10% 63 0 0.0% 3.2% 3.5% 10 to 14.9% I 73 6.2% 8.1% 8.2% 15 to 19.9% I 205 17.4% 13.6% 12.3% 20 to 24.9% 100.0% 262 22.3% 13.1% 12.5% 25 to 29.9% 72 6.1% 9.1% 11.4% 30 to 34.9% I 194 16.5% 9.7% 8.8% 35 to 39.9% I 86 7.3% 8.1% 6.1% 40 to 49.9% I 102 8.7% , 9.8% 8.1% 50.0% or More I 164 14.0% 20.1% 23.1% Not Computed 17 1.4% , 5.2% 6.0% Total Specified Units 1,175 100% 100% 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey Age and Maintenance of Housing Stock In 2014, roughly 39% (1,910 units) of the City's units were constructed before 1990 (greater than 27 years old). Just 5.4% of the housing units in Monticello were built before 1939. Monticello has a relatively new housing stock in comparison to Wright County and the State of Minnesota, with 60.8% of housing units being built since 1990 compared with 50.4% for the County and 29.0% for the State. TABLE 1-N: YEAR STUCTURE BUILT Year Structure Built Monticello Units 2010 or later 0 2000 to 2009 I 1,697 1990 to 1999 I 1,277 1980 to 1989 I 748 1970 to 1979 I 654 1960 to 1969 I 63 1950 to 1959 96 1940 to 1949 86 1939 or Earlier 263 Total Specified Units 4,884 Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey Percent Wright County State 0.0% 0.7% 0.8% 34.7 32.2% 14.6% 26.1% 18.5% 13.6% 15.3% 12.2% 13.0% 13.4% 16.0% 15.6% 1.3% 4.9% 9.8% 2.0% 4.1% 10.4% 1.8% 2.3% 4.8% 5.4% 9.2% 17.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 131Page A Monticello WSS LIFE -CYCLE HOUSING AND PROFILE OF HOUSEHOLDS The housing needs of a community relate to the demographic profile of the household. Typically, households move through several life -cycle stages; including entry-level households, first time homeowners, move -up buyers, empty nesters/young seniors, and senior citizens. The following describes each of these household types and the effect that they have on housing demands in Monticello. Entry -Level Households People in the 18 to 24 -year-old age group typically leave their childhood home and establish their own household. They often rent a house or an apartment because they generally do not have the income and savings needed to buy a home. In addition, many people in this age group move frequently, so they are hesitant to buy a house. They are also more likely to share housing with other unrelated people of similar age. The entry-level household population in Monticello will fluctuate annually. Many Monticello residents that graduate from high school move to other communities to attend a university or to pursue other job opportunities. In the long term, unless current conditions and trends change, Monticello is projected to see a 0.5% decrease in the 15 to 24 -year-old age group by year 2021 (Table 1-T). Job opportunities aimed at retaining this age cohort need to be strongly considered. Nevertheless, there will always be a strong need to provide affordable housing for people of all ages. First -Time Homeowners First time homeowners are typically in their 20s and 30s. They are usually "move -up" renters, meaning they "move up" from an apartment to a home. They are often married with young children, but increasingly, first time homeowners are single. They are prone to moving within several years of buying their first home for several reasons; including, increased salaries allow them to move to more expensive housing, children may require larger housing, and job opportunities may require that they move to another community. Monticello is projected to see a 0.3% increase in the 20-442 age group by year 2021 (Table I- T), which could translate into an increased demand for lower -end housing units. Move -Up Buyers Move -up buyers are typically in their 30s and 40s. They move up from the smaller, less expensive house that they had previously purchased. From an economic growth perspective, this is an important age group of people. Typically, move -up buyers have children in school and an established career. They are less likely to move to another community and start over. Also, professionals who are moving to a community to advance their career are generally looking to move to a more expensive house than what they had in their previous community. Monticello is projected to see a 0.5% decrease in the 25-543 age group by the year 2021 (Table I -F). This is 0.3% lower than the study area average of a 0.8% decrease. This may be an indicator that there is a shortage of available units for move -up buyers. Monticello must continue to 2 People in their 40s were included due to U.S. Census age groups. 3 People in their 20s and 50s were included due to U.S. Census age groups. MontiUcello 141Page A WSS ensure that it has adequate choices for those who are looking for move -up housing that will satisfy their needs until they are in their 50s and beyond. Empty Nesters and Young Seniors Empty nesters and young seniors are generally in their 50s, 60s, and early 70s. Often, their children have moved out of their house and left them with a larger house than needed. Empty nesters and young seniors often want to live in a smaller home, like a townhouse or patio home, that has less maintenance. The baby boom generation in Monticello is projected to increase by 0.6% by year 2021 (Table 1-F). A notable increase in apartment rentals in Monticello by members of this population segment is likely to occur. A large portion of these individuals will likely desire higher -end apartment complexes with quality amenities so they can maintain their current lifestyles. Senior Citizens This age group is generally in their late 70s and older and are often looking for low maintenance or assisted living housing. As the population ages, Monticello must continually ensure that it has adequate housing to meet the needs of seniors. The City is projected to see a 0.1% decrease in the 75 and older age group by year 2021 (Table 1-F). Monticello should continue to strive to be a senior -friendly community that values the contributions of seniors, promotes positive intergenerational interactions, considers the needs of seniors in community planning, supports the efforts of seniors to live independently, and acknowledges the role that family, friends, and neighbors play in the life of seniors. Special Needs Housing for those with special needs includes housing for those with mental and/or physical disabilities or health issues and those who need temporary or transitional housing. The number of people with special housing needs is expected to increase as the population of Monticello continues to age and grow. Senior Housing Market Monticello City staff members have identified a need for senior housing market analysis. Based upon population growth forecasts, household forecasts, and the current age of householders, we can extrapolate what the senior housing market will require. Table 1-0: Senior Housing Projections 2010-2021 illustrates how the change in the sixty-five and older population will affect the number of occupied housing units. By year 2021, Monticello will need 940 units suitable for senior residents to meet demand, which is an increase of 136 units from 2010. We consider senior housing to be any housing unit (affordable, renter, duplex, patio house, etc.) that meets the needs of residents sixty-five (65) and older. MontiUcello 151Page A WSS TABLE 1.0: SENIOR HOUSING PROJECTIONS — 2010-2021 Year 2010 2016 2021 Total Population 12,759 13,568 14,383 Total Occupied Units I 4,693 4,936 5,199 65+ Population I 1,207 1,308 1,411 65+ Population Percent I 9.5% 9.6% 9.8% Units Occupied by 65+ Population I 804 871 940 Percentage of Units Occupied by 65+ Population 1 17.1% 17.7% 18.1% Source: U.S. Census, ESRI Forecasts, WSB & Associates AFFORDABLE HOUSING Affordable housing is important to a strong economy and a healthy community. Increasingly, housing is not affordable for many working families and the lack of affordable housing for people of all ages and incomes causes families stress, dampens productivity and stifles job growth. Various organizations define "affordable housing" in many ways. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) generally defines housing as affordable if it costs less than thirty (30) percent of a household's income. However, HUD's Section 8 Income Guidelines are the basis for most affordable housing programs. Section 8 guidelines define low and moderate incomes on a sliding scale, depending on the number of persons in the family. For example, a four -person household is considered "moderate income" if their family income is eighty (80) percent of the area's median family income. Most housing affordability programs and data place emphasis on creating owner -occupied units at eighty (80) percent of the median family income (moderate income) and rental units at fifty (50) percent of the median family income (low income). Since low income persons are typically renters, the definition of "low income" is tied to the number of persons in each unit. This study identifies "affordable owner occupied units" as those affordable for moderate income families (eighty (80) percent of median income). Affordable rental units are based on fifty (50) percent of the median income and reflected on a per capita and per family basis. It is very important to note that the definition of "affordable" in terms of a dollar amount will continue to change as the cost of living increases and interest rates change. Therefore, the City should periodically review income/housing statistics and update the definition as warranted. Factors such as interest rates will impact housing affordability in both a positive and negative manner. Income by Age of Householder Looking at income data is also important when predicting future housing demands in the City of Monticello. In 2010, the median household income in Monticello was $68,135 ($67,963 in the County) and the largest employment industries were educational, health and social services, manufacturing, and retail trade. By 2016, the median household income increased significantly to approximately $76,954 ($73,798 in the County) and the top employment industries were the same. Monticello's median household income is projected to increase to $85,218 by 2021 ($83,257 in the County) according to ESRI Business Analyst. 161Page A Monticello WSB Income distributions as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau can be compared to affordability standards to determine how many households and families in the City of Monticello may require affordable housing. Table I -P: Monticello Affordable Housing Units Requirements - 2016 & 2021 depicts the number of households (renter and owner) that may require affordable housing (based on family income). The gray shaded area indicates family incomes of 80% or less of the median household income ($61,449 in 2016 and $68,174 in 2021). The red box indicates family incomes of 50% or less of the median household income ($38,406 in 2016 and $42,609 in 2021). By 2021, 2,214 owner households may require affordable housing, and 1,629 renter households may require affordable housing. TABLE 1-P: MONTICELLO AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS - 2016 & 2021 2016 2021 Annual Household Number of Households % of Total Number of Households % of Total Income Less than $15,000 18.0% 378 7.7% 411 7.9% $15,000 to $24,999 30.1% 286 5.8% 271 5.2% $25,000 to $34,999 JL 1.5% 332 6.7% 316 6.1% $35,000 to $49,999 100% 543 11.0% 631 12.1% $50,000 to $74,999 Income 834 16.9% i 512 9.8°IL $75,000 to $99,999 887 18.0% 937 18.0% $100,000 to $149,999 1,262 25.6% 1,564 30.1% $150,000 to $199,999 341 6.9% 472 9.1% $200,000 and over 74 1.5% 85 1.6% Total Households 4,937 100% 5,199 100% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts $11,522 $12,783 $18,434.64 The following table illustrated the maximum affordable housing costs for renters and owners based on median income. A direct relationship exists between monthly affordable housing costs and median income. Steps should be taken in Monticello to keep housing costs affordable as housing values increase such as maintaining current affordable housing stock and assuring opportunities for the construction of new affordable housing units. TABLE 1-Q: MAXIMUM AFFORDABLE HOUSING COSTS (RENTER & OWNER) - 2016 & 2021 MontiUcello 171Page WSS Renter Owner Year 2016 2021 2016 2021 Median Income $76,811 $85,218 $76,811 $85,218 Affordable Income: 50% Renter, 80% Owner $38,406 $42,609 $61,448.80 $68,174.40 30% of Affordable $11,522 $12,783 $18,434.64 $20,452.32 Income Monthly Housing Cost $960 $1,065 $1,536.22 $1,704.36 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts MontiUcello 171Page WSS OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS This section analyses the City of Monticello's owner occupied housing market. Analyzed in this section are single-family home resale trends, home foreclosures, actively marketing subdivisions, pending subdivisions, interviews with local real estate professionals and others involved in the local housing market to gain their feedback on existing market conditions and trends. The Wright County Assessor's Office provided data on resale trends. The following are key findings regarding the owner -occupied housing market. Home Resale Trends The average resale price of single-family homes in Monticello in 2016 was $202,073 and there were 342 sales. This was an increase in price from 2015 ($169,025 and 266 sales). While some of the price changes from year to year can be attributed to the age and quality of the homes sold during a year, an interview with a realty expert indicated the average resale price likely bottomed out in 2011 and slow price appreciation is expected to continue to bring prices back to a more market -neutral level. Median sale price is often a more reliable measure of price trends. In Monticello, the median sale price of single- family homes increased from $171,500 in 2015 to $185,269 in 2016, which reflects an increase of 8% for that period. TABLE 1-R: RE -SALE TRENDS OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES Year I Number of Sales 2015 266 2016 342 Source: Wright County Assessor's Office; WSB & Associates, Inc. Median Sale Price = Average Sale Price $171,500 $ 169,025 185,269 $ 202,073 Table 1-S shows the number of home sales in 2016 by the decade the homes were built. In 2016, 181 of the 342 (52.9%) single-family homes sold were built during year 2000 or later. Similarly, Table 1-N showed that approximately 34.7% of Monticello's owner -occupied single-family homes were built after 2000. Only 11.7% of the sales in 2016 were homes built prior to 1980. This highlights the relatively large supply of newer homes available to potential new residents moving to the community. Table I -S also highlights how the median sale price decreases as the homes get older. Most homes sold in Monticello in 2016 for under $170,000 were built before 1980. Homes priced above $180,000 were generally built since 2000. Source: Wright County Assessor's Office 181Page A Monticello WSB TABLE 1-S: HOME SALES BY DECADE BUILT 2016 Decade I Number of Sales Percentage Median Sale Price 1970 and Older I 27 7.9% $151,509 1971-1980 13 3.8% $166,000 1981-1990 I 23 6.7% $157,500 1991-2000 I 98 28.7% $181,467 2001-2010 I 132 38.6% $193,951 2010-2016 I 49 14.3% $221,050 Total: 342 100.0% Source: Wright County Assessor's Office 181Page A Monticello WSB Foreclosures Beginning in the middle of the last decade, home foreclosures began to have a significant impact on housing markets across the nation. Initially, most foreclosures occurred among buyers with lower credit ratings who had sub -prime mortgages. Gradually, foreclosure activity increased as jobs plummeted and home prices sank precipitously. Foreclosures have gradually decreased over the past few years as housing markets have stabilized. Table I -T presents foreclosure data for Wright County and Minnesota. The data are considered "Sheriff's Sales Foreclosures" and was compiled by the Minnesota Homeownership Center and published on their website. There were 7,212 foreclosures in Minnesota in 2015. This was down from 8,313 in 2014 and significantly lower than 11,834 in 2013. Wright County had 205 foreclosures in 2015, down from 240 in 2014 and 372 in 2013. Wright County has maintained a higher foreclosure rate than Minnesota. The foreclosure rate, as shown in Table 1-T, is defined as the number of foreclosed mortgages as a percent of total residential parcels. In 2015, Wright County's foreclosure rate was 0.49% compared to 0.40% in Minnesota. Foreclosures have hindered Wright County's housing market as they have other areas of the State. Out of 87 counties in the State, only 6 had a higher foreclosure count than Wright County. Those counties were Saint Louis, Washington, Dakota, Anoka, Ramsey, and Hennepin. TABLE 1-T: HOME FORECLOSURES WRIGHT COUNTY, 2013 to 2015 Sources: Minnesota Homeownership Center, HousingLink Single -Family Listings Based on a review of various Realtor websites, there were 77 single-family homes actively listed for sale in Monticello in November 2016. The homes were unevenly distributed by price range; weighted heavier toward higher priced homes. Only two (2) homes were priced below $120,000 and 68 priced $150,000 or higher listed for sale. Four (4) homes were listed for sale between $100,000 and $150,000. The average list price of homes on the market was $271,759 in November 2016. While homes typically sell for less than the list prices, the current prices suggest that Monticello should continue to see appreciation in home prices since the low point in 2011. Existing Lot Supply There are currently a limited number of lots available to accommodate new single-family homes in Monticello. The City is experiencing a shortage in buildable lots as bank owned lots have been purchased and developed. As of the end of 2016, there are a total of 74 single-family lots and sites that can accommodate up to 101 multi -family units. Permit numbers have steadily recovered from the 2010 and 2011 low point (two single family permits issued each year) to the issuance of 61 single-family permits in 2016. Prior to the recession, the City issued more than 300 permits annually. During that time (2002- 2007) housing lots were selling in the $70,000490,000 range. The sale price of lots fell by more than 80% after the recession. Bank foreclosures of developers resulted in existing lots becoming bank owned 191Page A Monticello WSB Wright County Minnesota Year Number of Foreclosures Foreclosure Rate Number of Foreclosures Foreclosure Rate 2013 372 0.89% 11,834 0.64% 2014 240 0.57% 8,313 0.46% 2015 205 0.49% 7,212 0.40% Sources: Minnesota Homeownership Center, HousingLink Single -Family Listings Based on a review of various Realtor websites, there were 77 single-family homes actively listed for sale in Monticello in November 2016. The homes were unevenly distributed by price range; weighted heavier toward higher priced homes. Only two (2) homes were priced below $120,000 and 68 priced $150,000 or higher listed for sale. Four (4) homes were listed for sale between $100,000 and $150,000. The average list price of homes on the market was $271,759 in November 2016. While homes typically sell for less than the list prices, the current prices suggest that Monticello should continue to see appreciation in home prices since the low point in 2011. Existing Lot Supply There are currently a limited number of lots available to accommodate new single-family homes in Monticello. The City is experiencing a shortage in buildable lots as bank owned lots have been purchased and developed. As of the end of 2016, there are a total of 74 single-family lots and sites that can accommodate up to 101 multi -family units. Permit numbers have steadily recovered from the 2010 and 2011 low point (two single family permits issued each year) to the issuance of 61 single-family permits in 2016. Prior to the recession, the City issued more than 300 permits annually. During that time (2002- 2007) housing lots were selling in the $70,000490,000 range. The sale price of lots fell by more than 80% after the recession. Bank foreclosures of developers resulted in existing lots becoming bank owned 191Page A Monticello WSB and ultimately being developed quickly. Many of the approved single family pre -plats were not completed due to the diminished demand for new homes. Refer to Table 1-U for full details. TABLE 1-U: AVAILABLE PLATTED & UTILITY SERVICED LOTS Development Single Family Lots Multi Family Lots Featherstone 15 0 Hunters Crossing I 0 At 0 Hillside Farm I 22 0 Spirit Hills I 0 5 Sunset Ponds I 21 0 Carlisle Village I 7 17 Autumn Ridge I 0 79 Eastview I 1 0 Club West I 7 0 Pine View I 1 0 Total I 74 101 Source: City of Monticello In mid -2016, the average price of a lot was about $20,000. As the housing market has improved and lot prices have increased due to the limited supply, it has allowed for an increase in prices for new single family lots. The new housing price situation is further aggravated by the limited number of remaining small home builders which have either closed or changed professions due to the recession and is now resulting in higher construction costs. According to a Monticello realty expert, another critical factor impacting the demand for single family homes is the degree to which first-time home buyers are riddled with college debt and unable to afford the price of a new home. The interest rate for new home loans has increased slightly from an all-time low of 3.4% during the depths of the recession to approximately 4.25% in late 2016. Monticello's average re -sale price currently sits in the five to seven percent range and is expected to go up. There are no major complaints or concerns among current homeowners looking to move up into more expensive homes. However, Monticello currently lacks availability of lots that are attractive for higher end housing. The community should focus on the development or attraction of a high-end housing development. The two -major upper -bracket areas (Carlisle Village and Briar Oakes Boulevard) have limited availability of undeveloped lots and are surrounded by agricultural uses. City -annexed land west of Monticello provides development opportunities but is unattractive to developers looking to build higher -market homes due to the lack of natural amenities and features generally associated with high end housing areas. Single-family Housing Permits The City of Monticello issued sixty-one (61) building permits in 2016. This number is up 38.6% from 2015 when forty-four (44) permits were issued (6 attached and 38 detached). To meet demand, the City will need to continue this trend. Please refer to Table I -C for additional information. 201Page A MontiUcello WSS RENTAL HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS Affordable Rental Housing This section of the report analyses the affordable rental housing market in Monticello. The analysis includes data collected from Affordable Housing Online. All the properties in this section are general occupancy. As shown in the demographic and housing stock overview sections, there are approximately 1,175 renter households in Monticello which is down 127 households from 2010. The overwhelming majority of renters live in larger multifamily properties. There are approximately 2,923 renters (24% of total population) living in Monticello. As of 2014, 25% of total Monticello households were renter -occupied, compared to 15.6% for Wright County, and 28% for the State of Minnesota. Properties that include units assisted by federal programs were surveyed as part of this analysis. In total, eight (8) properties with 322 units were surveyed. Twenty-six (26) percent of the City's rental units are federally subsidized. Monticello's federally assisted affordable rental housing stock includes properties financed through the following programs: TABLE 1-V: FEDERALLY ASSISTED AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING STOCK Program Properties Units Section 8 I 2 74 LIHTC I 3 102 RD 515 Ridgeway Apartments 6 189 Total I 9 307 Note: The total does not necessarily equal the sum of each program as some properties may participate in multiple funding programs Source: Affordable Housing Online The average number of units per property for affordable rentals in Monticello is 34. The largest federally assisted affordable rental community in Monticello is Ridgemont Apartments at 48 units and the smallest is Hillside Terrace II at 12 units. Two apartment properties provide housing for seniors totaling 59 units. All 307 units include some form of rental assistance (like Section 8) to make rent more affordable for very low income families. In Monticello, a family of four must earn $42,900 or less to qualify for Section 8 housing. See Table I- W.- Federally Assisted Units by Property for details. Source: Affordable Housing Online Note: Not all unit counts are available from HUD MontiUcello 21 JPage WSB TABLE I -W: FEDERALLY ASSISTED UNITS BY PROPERTY Name Sec 8 LIHTC RD 515 Senior Broadway Square - - 28 Cedar Crest Apartments 38 - Hillside Terrace -- Monticello 36 - Hillside Terrace II - 12 Ridgeway Apartments 44 - River Park View Apartments 31 31 Ridgemont Apartments 48 - Source: Affordable Housing Online Note: Not all unit counts are available from HUD MontiUcello 21 JPage WSB Photographs of Monticello Apartment Buildings Image 2: River Park View Apartments Image 1: Ridgemont Apartments Image 3: Hillside Terrace I Image 4: Cedar Crest Apartments Image 6: Ridgeway Apartments Image 5: Broadway Square 0 MontiUcello 221Page A WSS Image 8: 7th Street Townhomes Image 7: Monticello Crossings f There are currently three future housing development sites that have been identified in Monticello. Site A is an 11.93 -acre area located at 506 Territorial Road and is the site of the historic registered Rand House which was the home of the Minnegasco founders. This site is zoned low density residential (R-1) and performance-based overlay and may be used for the development of a senior housing apartment complex with sixty to eighty units (60-80) in addition to forty (40) patio homes. The Rand House would be used as a community center and guest home for the development. Rezoning this area using the planned unit development (PUD) process may be the best option to allow for this higher density development. The uniqueness of the property and the City's need for additional senior housing units could be used to justify the PUD. Also, we believe the proposed housing development is consistent with the purpose of the performance based enhancement district. Site B is a 6.4 -acre area located north of the lake on the corner of Elm Street and 7t' Street West. It is zoned for medium density residential (R-3) and may be used for multifamily, senior, or market -rate development. It is within proximity to the Cub Food Store and the Community Center. The site's southern exposure to the wetland pond offers an attractive natural amenity. Finally, Site C is located at the corner of Locust Street and 31 Street West and has already been approved for the construction of a twenty-three (23) unit three story residential development. As stated earlier in the "Senior Housing Market" section, from 2010-2021 Monticello will need to construct 136 new senior housing units to meet the forecasted demand. Sites A and B have both been identified as ideal locations for senior housing development. Depending on the number of units permitted on each of these sites, and on how many senior housing units have been constructed from 2010-2016, Monticello may need to identify more sites suitable for senior housing. i a Mont1C�0 231Page A WSB Image 9: Site A Image 10: Site B Image 11: Site C 241Page A �Moifao WSB DEMAND ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS This section of the report utilizes data collected in the previous sections to calculate demand for owned and rental housing in Monticello through 2021. Housing Demand Analysis Demand for additional housing in Monticello will primarily come from household growth. Replacement of older homes will contribute to the need for additional residential development, as will pent-up demand. Table 1 X outlines our calculations for owner and rental housing demand in Monticello from 2017 to 2021. TABLE 1-X: POTENTIAL HOUSING DEMAND OVER NEXT 5 YEARS 2017 to 2021 A. Household growth* 500 B. Replacement Demand 10 C. Total housing growth (A+B) 510 Range to occur over next 5 years: D. Percent rental demand 30% to 35% E. Rental housing demand (C x D) 153 to 179 F. Pent-up rental demand 64 64 G. Total rental housing demand (E+F) 217 to 243 H. Percent owner demand 65% to 70% I. Total owner housing demand (C x H) 332 to 357 * Includes projected growth for Monticello (263 households) and one-fifth the growth in the remainder of the market area (237) Sources: US Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts, WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 1-E shows that Monticello is projected to add 263 households between 2016 and 2021 and the remainder of the market area is projected to add 1,183 households. We estimate that Monticello can capture one-fifth of the demand in the remainder of the market area, or 237 households, by providing greater housing choices to retain and attract some potential residents who otherwise would live in the surrounding areas. Thus, an additional 500 housing units would need to be developed from 2017 to 2021 to satisfy projected household growth in Monticello. Replacement demand is generated from the loss of housing or the need to replace housing units that are physically or functionally obsolete. A review of Monticello's housing stock from the U.S. Census revealed that there are about 340 housing units built prior to 1950. It can be assumed that these homes' values are decreasing at a faster rate relative to other types of housing. Most of these homes are in good condition', and we estimate that 0.5% percent per year should be removed annually from the housing supply because of obsolescence, which equates to two units every year or ten units over the next five years. A healthy rental market is expected to have a vacancy rate of about 5% to allow for sufficient consumer choice and unit turnover. With pent-up demand (a shortage of units), persons who would normally form 4 Good condition meaning that these homes do not need renovated or demolished. 251Page A Monti�cllo WSB their own rental households, instead decide to move in with other persons in a housing unit, live with their parents, or live in housing outside of the area and commute to jobs. In 2016, Monticello had an estimated 1,300 rental households, of which 20 units (1.5% from Table 2-1) were vacant. This percentage is well below the stabilized vacancy rate. In order to bring the overall vacancy rate to a balanced 5%, about 64 additional rental units would need to be added to the city. Based on demographic and market trends, we project 30% to 35% of the housing demand from household growth and replacement -need in Monticello between 2017 and 2021 will be for rental housing. There is a total of demand for approximately 217 to 243 rental households (about 44 to 49 annually). This demand is for all types of rental housing — from subsidized and market rate general occupancy housing to senior housing. An estimate of 65% to 70% of housing demand in Monticello between 2017 and 2021 is projected to be for owner -occupied housing. This equates to demand for 332 to 357 households from 2017 to 2021 (66 to 71 homes annually.). This would equate to the projected demand for single-family homes and townhomes. These demand projections are based upon the housing market's behavior over that last ten years. During this time, we experienced the market correction of 2009-2013 which greatly impacted the calculations causing the projections to be historically low. It can be anticipated that if the housing market continues its recovery, the demand for both rental -occupied and owner -occupied households will be greater than the projections. It can be further extrapolated that in response to the increased regulations on mortgages, and the high rates of student debt, the demand for rental housing will dramatically increase. Other Housing Recommendations Projected demand for new housing products in Monticello through the remainder of the decade from current and future residents is outlined on the preceding pages. In addition, there are other programs that Monticello can implement to assist in meeting local housing needs and improving the quality of the existing stock. The key programs/initiatives that Monticello should pursue are outlined below. • Monticello needs to closely monitor rental vacancy rates and availability as new rental properties are added to the community. The addition of the 202 -unit Monticello Crossing apartment complex has set a precedent with 200 of its units being occupied during a very short timeframe. This indicates a clear pent-up demand that should continue to increase at the housing market recovers from the correction. • Monticello should also work towards converting vacant housing units into renter -occupied to reach 30-35% of total housing units. In its current state, the rental housing inventory sits at 25% of total housing units. As seen in Table 1-1, the City is projected to have seventy-six (76) additional vacancies. • Monticello needs to maintain its low housing costs and low percentage (19%) of residents paying more than 30% of their monthly household income on housing to reduce the negative impacts from another housing correction like 2006-08. This percentage is much lower than county and state averages (27% and 29% respectively). • Monticello should make efforts to increase affordable rental housing inventory so they are available for younger generations of citizens as well as baby -boomers and empty -nesters. The latter two cohorts of residents are downsizing their living spaces and need affordable places to 261Page A Monticello WSS live. Combining affordable housing options with job opportunities could lead to an increase in 19 -24 -year-old residents. • Monticello should also ensure an adequate amount of higher -end rental units for higher -income individuals looking to retire and downsize their living quarters. While these individuals are looking for smaller spaces, they are not willing to surrender the amenities to which they have grown accustom. • With the expected increase in the percentage of residents over the age of sixty-five (65), Monticello needs to increase their stock of senior housing units. Refer to Table 1-0 for projected figures. • Monticello should consider the development of housing in the downtown area to accommodate young seniors and millennial residents. Both cohorts share the same preference for areas that are rich with amenities and walkable, and housing properties that have lower maintenance requirements. Providing residents with downtown housing options is critical if the city wishes to achieve population age diversity and a complete life -cycle housing environment. y �,y �._ - > •int 4 :�.I ; � .� � �,�, :� r ��y R .,€� + '4 r° REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 10, 2019 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: Jim Davidson 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Agenda The Mayor requested to add for discussion a volunteer for the Riverfest duck adoption. Councilmember Gabler would like to comment on the potential for rotating councilmember liaison position on Planning Commission for the remainder of the year. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the agenda with the additional items as listed above. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Approval of Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from Mav 28, 2019 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the special meeting minutes from May 28. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meeting Minutes from May 28, 2019 Councilmember Fair moved approval of the regular minutes from May 28, 2019. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. J,izen Comments • Charles Walters, 501 E. 3rd Street, addressed the city council on the upcoming stormwater fee. Mr. Walters is concerned that his property is being assessed incorrectly. He is being charged a stormwater fee based on the zoning residential with a business use which was grandfathered in. He is being charged as a commercial property. He disagrees with this and feels that he should be charged the residential fee. Matt Leonard, City Engineer, responded that the reason he was charged that fee is because Wright County has him listed as a multi -use residential/commercial property. Mayor Stumpf questioned whether or not there were other properties that are listed as multi -use. Mr. Leonard noted that there are but they are typically downtown businesses that have residences above. Mr. Walters's property is unique. Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, reiterated that the reason it is listed as commercial is because the county has listed them as multi -use. Mr. Oberg suggested bringing this issue to the Finance Committee for discussion. Mayor Stumpf requested that when City Council Minutes —June 10, 2019 Page 1 1 5 this is brought up at the Finance Committee that a list of similar properties is provided for comparison. He noted that the location of the properties should be taken into consideration. The resolution will be brought back to council either as an item or as information. E. Public Service Announcements • None. F. Council Liaison Updates • Highway 25 Coalition — Jeff O'Neill provided an update. The coalition is planning on contracting with a third party facilitator to assist with developing a regional plan. • IEDC — Mayor Stumpf noted that the commission discussed the lack of availability of industrial buildings, specifically 5,000 —15,000 sq. ft. buildings for outdoor storage. Councilmember Hilgart questioned when the WSB land inventory study will be completed. Jim Thares, Economic Development Manager, responded that the first draft of the study will be brought to the EDA in August. The IEDC also discussed their recent BR&E visits to Polaris and Precision Machining. • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler stated that the Planning Commission approved a CUP for Headwaters Development project, a lot combination for SPO LLC, and appointed a new commissioner. G. Department Updates City Administrator Update - Jeff O'Neill provided an update on the following items: 1. The soccer club has agreed to do the striping for their leased building for $4,500. 2. Wright County Sheriff's Office will be conducting emergency response training at the Monticello Community Center in August. 3. All rental licensing properties are in full compliance per our city ordinance. 4. Regional Trail planning is in progress with Wright County, Otsego, and Clearwater. A survey was distributed for residents input. 5. Chamber of Commerce is exploring the opportunity to have mural extended onto their building. The council discussed having a mural painted on the city building. There is no cost to the city. There was consensus among council to allow the mural. There was also discussion on the kiosk/sign. The council requested an update on the status of the kiosk. 6. Update on Riverside Cemetery maintenance issues. There may be a future short workshop in regard to regulations and enforcement of rules governing placement of personal items in grass maintenance areas. 7. Breakfast and Politics on Thursday, June 13. City Council Minutes —June 10, 2019 Page 2 1 5 • Construction Update — Matt Leonard, City Engineer/Public Works Director, provided a construction update on the following: 1. 2018 Pedestrian Improvements: Trail has been paved along CSAH 39. The contractor plans to start sodding on Bakken and CSAH 39 this week. 2. Fallon Avenue Overpass: Pavement markings for the crosswalks are planned to be installed June 13-15. This will require the rounda- bouts to be closed. 3. BCOL Athletic Complex: Starting to work on the pump house and wells are being drilled this week. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Fair moved approval of Consent Agenda excluding items F and I. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $835,621.17. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires Fire, Liquor Store, Streets, and DMV and departures for DMV and MCC. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: Approved as presented. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-40 accepting a donation from Monticello Lions for Wildland Gear boots for Fire Department and $5,000 from Rotary for picnic tables for Park Department. Recommendation: Mayor Stumpf recognized the donors. Adopted Resolution 2019-40 accepting the donations. E. Consideration of approving annual liquor license renewals for 2019-2020. Recommendation: Approved the liquor license renewals. F. Consideration of approving an amendment to community solar garden subscription agreements, assignment of community solar garden subscription agreements from MN Community LLC (f/k/a NRG MN Community LLC) a Delaware limited liability company ("Assignor"), to Novel Energy Solutions LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Assignee"), and then from Novel Energy Solutions LLC ("Assignor") to Novel Solar Two LLC ("Assigned"), a Minnesota limited liability company, and execution of the estoppel certificate. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA. G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-41 accepting a petition and calling for public hearing on July 8, 2019 for vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements as legally described for Carlisle Village 6th Addition. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2019-41 accepting the petition and calling for the public hearing. H. Consideration of approving the contract for replacement of the Monticello Community Center partitions in the men's and women's restrooms and the men's locker room with L & L Contracting in the amount of $14,045. City Council Minutes —June 10, 2019 Page 3 1 5 Recommendation: Approved the contract with L & L Contracting in the amount of $14,045. I. Consideration of authorizing Michels Corporation to install FiberNet facilities in Carlisle 6th Addition development in the amount of up to $56,919. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. J. Consideration of appointing Allison Zimpfer to the Monticello Planning Commission for a term to expire on December 31, 2019. Recommendation: Approved the appointment of Allison Zimpfer. 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion F. Consideration of approving an amendment to community solar garden subscription agreements, assignment of community solar garden subscription agreements from MN Community LLC (f/k/a NRG MN Community LLC) a Delaware limited liability company ("Assignor') to Novel Solar Two LLC ("Assignee'), and then from Novel Energy Solutions LLC ("Assignor") to Novel Solar Two LLC ("Assigned'), a Minnesota limited liability company, and execution of the estoppel certificate. Mayor Stumpf removed the item for discussion. Wayne Oberg provided a brief background and noted that these types of agreements change hands frequently. The subscription total decreased to 82.7% of the originally amount. Discussion ensued among Council. Mayor Stumpf expressed concern about the cover of the report having a photo of a solar garden with the City of Monticello listed. He wanted it to be clear the Monticello is not building a solar garden and does not want it to be distributed. In addition he is concerned about solar gardens being built near cities and how fast the solar industry is changing and doesn't agree with being locked in. Will Georgia, Novel Energy Solutions, responded that the photo is another solar garden located in Minnesota. Mr. Georgia noted that the original project was not able to be completed and Novel Energy was contacted because it was a local company and there is a project being built in Waite Park. He proceeded to explain the details of the project. Councilmember Fair moved to approve the amendment to community solar garden subscription agreements, assignment of community solar garden subscription agreements from MN Community LLC (Vk/a NRG MN Community LLC) a Delaware limited liability company ("Assignor"), to Novel Energy Solutions L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability company ("Assignee"), and then from Novel Energy Solutions L.L.C. ("Assignor") to Novel Solar Two LLC ("Assignee"), a Minnesota limited liability company, and execution of the estoppel certificate. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-1; Mayor Stumpf voted against, Councilmember Davidson absent. I. Consideration of authorizing Michels Corporation to install FiberNet facilities in Carlisle Village 6th Addition development in the amount of up to $56,919. City Council Minutes —June 10, 2019 Page 4 1 5 Mayor Stumpf removed the item to reiterate the city's support of installing FiberNet into developments. Mayor Stumpf moved approval of Michels Corporation installing FiberNet facilities in Carlisle Village 6` Addition development in the amount of up to $56,919. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Public Hearings: None. 4. Regular Agenda: None 5. Additional Items: Duck Adoption (Riverfest): Councilmembers Fair and Gabler volunteered to adopt out ducks for Riverfest on June 26 from 4-6 p.m. at Cub Foods. Planning Commission Council Liaison: Councilmember Gabler questioned whether the Council would be interested in rotating as Council liaison on Planning Commission. The reason for this is to have more of connection between Council and Planning Commission. There was consensus that rotating quarterly could be an option. Councilmember Gabler will connect with Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, to work out the details. 6. Adiournment: By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:49 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes —June 10, 2019 Page 5 1 5 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2A. Consideration of approving pavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,495,364.39. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 06/19/2019 - 1:37PM Batch: 00203.06.2019 - 00203.06.2019 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 2925 1 ST LINE/LEEWES VENTURES LLC 133395 Flavored Syrups for Concession (3) Check Sequence: 1 Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3351188 226-45125-425410 resale - beer 3352498 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 292005 Check Sequence: 2 May 2019 - Monticello Drops 292005 False May 2019 -FNM expenses 6/8/2019 609-49750-425200 IT Services - June 2019 Check Total: Vendor: 5268 JUDY ASHLEY 5/18/19 reimburse mailbox replacement Check Total: Vendor: 5117 ASPEN MILLS 238255 Check Sequence: 3 navy pants - J.C. Enabled: True Check Total: Vendor: 2886 AUSCO DESIGN AND MARKETING 4294 Magnet Clips (250), Post Its (50) for Census Pro 06/25/2019 656-49877-421800 Check Total: Vendor: 1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY Moiiii6effo Y Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 298.25 06/25/2019 226-45125-425410 298.25 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 38.60 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 371.70 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 410.30 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 465.40 06/25/2019 656-49877-440100 3,900.60 06/25/2019 656-49877-421800 73.00 06/25/2019 702-00000-431990 4,439.00 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 14.99 06/25/2019 101-43120-421990 14.99 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 54.91 06/25/2019 101-42200-421120 54.91 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 657.50 06/25/2019 101-41410-421990 657.50 Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1397699 (163.10) gal 1OW30 CK4; (134.50) gal 1000 TH 5,265.91 06/25/2019 101-43127-421300 Check Total: 5,265.91 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 69986600 resale - wine 354.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 69986600 resale - liquor 576.01 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 69986600 freight 17.10 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 71043800 resale- wine 180.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 71043800 resale -liquor 94.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 71043800 freight 10.80 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 71776700 resale - liquor 74.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 71776700 freight 2.70 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 99590000 freight 0.98 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 99590000 asst. bags 75.10 06/25/2019 609-49754-421990 99590000 resale - mix 89.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 99590000 resale - condiments; juice 49.60 06/25/2019 609-49750-425500 99626200 resale - mix 38.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 99626200 freight 0.17 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 99650800 freight 1.27 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 99650800 asst. bags 161.00 06/25/2019 609-49754-421990 99650800 resale - condiments 117.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425500 Check Total: 1,840.73 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 77801 resale - pop, water, 199.80 06/25/2019 226-45125-425410 77801 Return Empty CO2 Tanks (5) -462.00 06/25/2019 226-45123-421460 77802 resale -juice 65.60 06/25/2019 609-49750-425500 77802 resale - soda pao 65.80 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 77803 resale - beer 2,124.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 80863 resale - pop, water, V8 Splash 161.35 06/25/2019 226-45125-425410 80864 resale - soda pop 197.40 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 80865 resale - beer 2,132.25 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 4,484.20 Vendor: 5234 BITZER GARAGE DOORS, LLC Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 14121 ballfields- service call; cables 101.48 06/25/2019 101-45203-440440 Check Total: 101.48 Vendor: 1074 BOLTON AND MENK INC Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 0233505 18C001 - 2019 Pedestrian Improvements 10,170.00 06/25/2019 400-43300-459013 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 10,170.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1075 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION 50791 Agent Service GO Refunding Bonds Series 2011 Check Total: Vendor: 4872 BOSER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP 6/6/2019 16C006 - Sprinkler Repairs Due to Round About 475.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC 59953 UB June 2019 Invoices (3690) Print, Fold, Stuff, 59953 UB June 2019 Invoices (3690) Print, Fold, Stuff, 59953 Summer of Happiness Guide Inserts for UB BIlli Check Total: Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPH 1080982281 resale - liquor 1080982281 resale - wine 1080982281 freight 1080982282 resale - beer 1080985558 resale - wine 1080985558 resale - mix 1080985558 freight 1080985558 resale - liquor 1080985559 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 1086 BURNHAM COMPANIES LLC 5477 (90) 90yd gold mulch; delivered to PW 6-11-19 06/25/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 1089 SARA CAHILL 6/17/2019 Mileage Reimbursement - NICHA Meeting & & 06/25/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 2348-000G 202 Planning & Zoning Admin - May 2019 Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 10,170.00 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True 475.00 06/25/2019 312-47000-462010 475.00 Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False 7,046.45 06/25/2019 400-43300-459018 7,046.45 Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 571.48 06/25/2019 601-49440-431800 571.48 06/25/2019 602-49490-431800 401.90 06/25/2019 101-45201-435100 1,544.86 Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 3,090.19 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 361.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 37.69 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 122.75 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 504.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 170.60 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 65.05 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 3,279.58 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 255.20 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 7,886.06 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: True 2,050.00 06/25/2019 101-45201-422500 2,050.00 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True 165.30 06/25/2019 226-45122-433100 165.30 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 592.00 06/25/2019 101-41910-430400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2348-000G 202 General Legal Admin - May 2019 2,469.40 06/25/2019 101-41610-430400 2348-000G 202 Sewer Admin - May 2019 80.00 06/25/2019 602-49480-430400 2348-000G 202 201815 - Haven Ridge/Denn Default - May 2015 264.00 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-000G 202 201907 - Spaeth PUD Amendment - May 2019 80.00 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-OOIG 118 Code Enforcement Services - May 2019 510.00 06/25/2019 101-42400-430400 2348-0141 G 7 Camping World First Addition Plat - May 2019 208.00 06/25/2019 101-41910-430400 2348-144G 8 201907 - Spaeth Industrial Park Plat - May 2019 98.80 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-148G 22 16C006 Fallon Ave Condemnation - May 2019 157.60 06/25/2019 400-43300-459018 2348-158G 2 Jameson Quiet Title Action - May 2019 187.00 06/25/2019 101-41610-430400 2348-159G 2 Ellison House Purchase - May 2019 2,447.10 06/25/2019 101-41610-430400 2348-160G 1 201911 - Spirit Hills South Plat - May 2019 504.80 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-161G 1 201910 - Headwaters Development LLC - May. 382.80 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 7,981.50 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True 2273929 resale - beer 22,969.15 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 2273929 resale - beer n/a 117.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 2277208 resale - beer 20,253.65 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 2277208 resale - beer n/a 120.80 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 643-0526 resale - beer credit -37.94 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 43,422.66 Vendor: 1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False 17388 resale - wine 432.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 432.00 Vendor: 5085 MAIA CARNICOM Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: False 144 January - May 2019 Programs/Storytime (4) 140.00 06/25/2019 101-00000-220150 Check Total: 140.00 Vendor: 5119 CHOSEN VALLEY TESTING INC Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 25646 18C003-CONSTR - Stand. Proctor Test; (4) Exa 589.00 06/25/2019 400-43300-452010 Check Total: 589.00 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: True 112-0406 resale - beer 28,391.57 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 112-0406 resale - beer n/a 75.05 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 112-0433 resale - beer 3,994.50 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 112-0433 resale - beer 113.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 112-0481 resale - beer 34,932.77 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 112-0481 resale - beer n/a 238.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 112-0484 resale - beer 1,898.10 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 112-0484 resale - beer n/a 30.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 851976 resale - beer 2,160.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 852395 resale - beer 246.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 855257 resale - beer 285.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 858282 resale - beer 534.15 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 885758 resale - beer credit -69.75 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 72,828.39 Vendor: 4475 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: True e770460 16C001 -PHASE I - 1500 ft. 20' pvc; (12) pvc cei 3,184.44 06/25/2019 229-45202-453011 Check Total: 3,184.44 Vendor: 2050 DEMVI LLC Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 6/11/2019 July - Parking Lot Easement Maint Agreement 121.60 06/25/2019 213-46301-443990 Check Total: 121.60 Vendor: 5201 DICK FAMILY, INC. Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: True 5250101 resale - beer 185.20 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 185.20 Vendor: 5271 RONALD DROPIK Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 6/14/2019 Performances @ Farmers Market 6/6/19 & 6/20/ 250.00 06/25/2019 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 250.00 Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: True 701375 Ordinance #721A - Ad# 945179 158.45 06/25/2019 101-41910-435100 701376 201907 - Ordinance #722 - Ad# 945214 195.37 06/25/2019 101-41910-435100 Check Total: 353.82 Vendor: 4191 ELK RIVER GREENHOUSE LLC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True 6/14/2019 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/23, 6/( 161.00 06/25/2019 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 161.00 Vendor: 4787 ELK RIVER NURSERY Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False 6/17/2019 (3) Korian Feather Grasses- East Bridge 59.97 06/25/2019 101-45201-422500 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 59.97 Check Sequence: 31 13,509.61 06/25/2019 703-00000-165010 13,509.61 Check Sequence: 32 149.75 06/25/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 1793 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOG. OAK19004 Ford 2019- Fire Dept. - install radio; lightbar; so Check Sequence: 33 1,970.00 Check Total: Vendor: 5033 ENTERTAINMENT PROTECTION GROUP, L 16211 Security Coverage - 6/1/19 Check Sequence: 34 150.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1166 ESRI 93649062 9/1/19 - 8/31/20- ArcGIS Desktop/Enterprise We Check Sequence: 35 2,546.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4674 JENNIFER FEARING 6/14/2019 Face Painting @ Walk & Roll 6/8/19 Check Sequence: 36 651.22 Check Total: Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 331078 19.50 resale - (3) meters 702-00000-432100 264.01 Check Total: Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH 6/8/2019 231.54 June 2019 - Phone - City Hall 6/8/2019 276.05 June 2019 - Phone - MCC 6/8/2019 113.94 June 2019 - Phone - Ballfields 6/8/2019 14.22 June 2019 - Phone - DMV 6/8/2019 69.80 June 2019 - Phone - Hi Way Liquor 6/8/2019 134.95 June 2019 - Phone - Fire Hall 6/8/2019 10.00 June 2019 - Phone - Public Works 6/8/2019 10.00 June 2019 - Phone - Parks 6/8/2019 41.95 June 2019 - Phone - Prairie Center 6/8/2019 41.95 June 2019 - Phone - Sheriff 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - City Hall 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - MCC 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - Ballfields 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - DMV 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - Hi Way Liquor Amount Payment Date Acct Number 59.97 Check Sequence: 31 13,509.61 06/25/2019 703-00000-165010 13,509.61 Check Sequence: 32 149.75 06/25/2019 226-45123-431992 149.75 Check Sequence: 33 1,970.00 06/25/2019 101-43111-430910 1,970.00 Check Sequence: 34 150.00 06/25/2019 101-45130-444140 150.00 Check Sequence: 35 2,546.00 06/25/2019 601-49440-422710 2,546.00 Check Sequence: 36 651.22 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 548.64 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 19.50 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 264.01 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 341.89 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 231.54 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 276.05 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 113.94 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 14.22 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 69.80 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 134.95 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 10.00 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 10.00 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 41.95 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 41.95 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - Fire Hall 41.95 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - Animal Shelter 29.95 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - Public Works 69.95 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - Sheriff 41.95 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Internet - MCC @ Prairie Center 40.63 06/25/2019 702-00000-432300 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Cable - Fire Hall 5.11 06/25/2019 101-42200-431990 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Cable - City Hall 12.95 06/25/2019 101-41310-431990 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Cable - MCC 338.01 06/25/2019 226-45127-432500 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Data Hosting - City Hall 500.00 06/25/2019 702-00000-431900 6/8/2019 June 2019 - Service Contract - City Hall 250.00 06/25/2019 702-00000-431900 Check Total: 4,100.16 Vendor: 3748 JEFFREY D GARDNER Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: True 6/14/2019 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/30/19 25.00 06/25/2019 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 25.00 Vendor: 3762 GARRETTS DIAMOND CITY BREAD Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: True 6/14/2019 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/30, 6/1 82.00 06/25/2019 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 82.00 Vendor: 1712 DARYL GILLES Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False 2281 repair/move water bag hangers; add reciever & d 589.00 06/25/2019 101-42200-440500 Check Total: 589.00 Vendor: 1205 GRAINGER INC Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 9194622800 Condenser Fin Whisk Brush (2) 3.56 06/25/2019 226-45126-422990 9208485517 Pleated Air Filters (24) 109.44 06/25/2019 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 113.00 Vendor: 5273 GREAT RIVER SOCCER CLUB Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 6/7/2019 18C003 - Re -striping Parking Lot 4,500.00 06/25/2019 400-43300-452010 Check Total: 4,500.00 Vendor: 4048 MELISSA HARTNER Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False 6/14/2019 Face Painting @ Walk & Roll 6/8/19 300.00 06/25/2019 101-45130-444140 Check Total: 300.00 Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description 4514566 Aluminum Sulfate Liquid - W WTP Amount Check Total: Vendor: 1239 HOGLUND BUS COMPANY INC 133845 Parts- 08 Spartan Metro Star- repair dash switch; 133845 Labor- 08 Spartan Metro Star- repair dash switcl Acct. # 173222 - Liquor Liability Ins. 7/16/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 143134 resale - beer Amount Payment Date Check Total: Vendor: 4745 ILLINOIS CASUALTY COMPANY LL103171 2019 Acct. # 173222 - Liquor Liability Ins. 7/16/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC 3766 (3) graves- Rosnow; Shierts; Anderson Check Total: Vendor: 5245 JERRY KONZ 6/17/19 06/25/2019 dba JK Landscape -refund Water Use Permit- Del 6/17/19 refund Water Use Permit- Dep. $2000-$83.80 us, 6/17/19 06/25/2019 refund Water Use Permit- Dep. $2000-$83.80 us, Pay Voucher #2 16C006 - Pay Voucher #2 - Fallon Ave Landscap Check Total: Vendor: 4699 JIM LEUER CONSTRUCTION 6/18/2019 Escrow Refund - 5991 Deer Street/Hillside Farm ACH Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2979685 resale - beer 2979685 resale - beer n/a 2979715 resale - beer 2979715 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6,159.60 06/25/2019 602-49480-421990 6,159.60 Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: True 187.34 06/25/2019 101-42200-440500 1,228.50 06/25/2019 101-42200-440500 1,415.84 Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False 1,464.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 1,464.00 Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False 1,479.00 06/25/2019 609-49754-436100 1,479.00 Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 1,200.00 06/25/2019 651-49010-431150 1,200.00 Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 2,000.00 06/25/2019 601-00000-220111 -78.04 06/25/2019 601-49440-371100 -5.76 06/25/2019 601-00000-208100 72,971.88 06/25/2019 400-43300-459018 74,888.08 Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 2,000.00 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 2,000.00 Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 2,303.05 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 57.60 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 1,638.05 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 3.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 4,001.70 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 51 1303179 freight 80.46 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1303179 resale - liquor 5,019.97 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1303180 resale - wine 1,483.10 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 1303180 freight 43.21 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1303999 freight 40.86 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1303999 resale - liquor 2,766.51 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1304000 resale - wine 1,477.90 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 1304000 resale - mix 32.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 1304000 freight 44.69 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1305234 freight 44.31 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1305234 resale - liquor 3,154.77 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1305235 resale - wine 1,540.40 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 1305235 freight 37.25 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1305236 resale - beer 16.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 1307802 resale - liquor 877.39 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1307802 freight 11.92 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1307803 resale - wine 577.55 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 1307803 freight 17.88 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1308505 freight 36.50 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1308505 resale - liquor 2,425.80 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1308506 resale - mix 35.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 1308506 freight 1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1309378 freight 44.71 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1309378 resale - liquor 3,822.66 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1309379 resale - wine 2,141.36 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 1309379 resale - mix 105.35 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 1309379 freight 64.82 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1310738 freight 1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1310738 resale - liquor 122.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1310739 resale - wine 771.10 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 1310739 freight 13.90 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1313519 resale - liquor 6,709.75 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1313519 freight 87.17 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1313520 freight 22.35 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1313520 resale - wine 737.65 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 1314269 resale - liquor 9,489.54 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1314269 freight 100.20 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1314270 freight 22.35 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1314270 resale - wine 780.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 Reference ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 545727 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1189521 -143.35 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 545727 freight credit inv. # 1189521 -1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 545728 freight credit inv. # 1292549 -0.25 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 545728 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1292549 -71.74 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 545729 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1283128 -13.84 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 545729 resale - wine credit inv. # 1283128 -131.83 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 545730 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1293787 -112.40 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 545730 freight credit inv. # 1293787 -1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 546023 freight credit inv. 1297826 -2.98 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 546389 freight credit inv. 1299265 -1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 546389 resale - liquor credit inv. 1299265 -122.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 547059 resale - wine credit inv.# 1275299 -52.40 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 547060 resale - wine credit inv.# 1302695 -55.15 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 547060 freight credit inv.# 1302695 -1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 547740 resale - liquor credit inv.# 1302694 -7.92 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 548291 resale - liquor credit inv.# 1305234 -333.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 548291 freight credit inv.# 1305234 -1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 548553 freight credit inv.# 1307803 -2.98 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 548553 resale - wine credit inv.# 1307803 -110.30 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 43,633.77 Vendor: 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False MN190-00101 General EDA- April 2019 200.00 06/25/2019 213-46301-430400 MN325-00040 Business Facade Grant Program - April 2019 681.00 06/25/2019 213-46301-430400 MN325-00041 GMEF Loan - Monticello RV Center - April 201 420.00 06/25/2019 213-46301-430400 Check Total: 1,301.00 Vendor: 1273 KIWI KAI IMPORTS, INC. Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False 53958 resale - wine 311.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 53958 freight 5.25 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 316.25 Vendor: 5270 JUDITH KOVACS Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: True 6/17/2019 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/6/19 27.00 06/25/2019 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 27.00 Vendor: 5263 TIM LAUDNER Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False Rvrfst 2019 Riverfest Appearance- 7-13-19- Hi -Way Liquor 3,000.00 06/25/2019 609-49754-425550 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 3,000.00 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1290 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 293233 06/25/2019 2019 Safety & Loss Control Workshop- LS Check Total: Vendor: 1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 4808 LMCIT Claim #84096 - Date of Loss 3/21/19 - Check Total: Vendor: 3933 CHARLES LONG 6/14/2019 06/25/2019 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/13/19 Check Total: Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC 21438 resale - beer 21600 resale - beer ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP 281834 resale - tobacco; barware;soda pop; etc 281834 resale - cigarettes; juice Check Total: Vendor: 1305 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC W04552 Enabled: labor - Vactor 2100 flapper install W04552 06/25/2019 parts- Vactor 2100 flapper install Check Total: Vendor: 1306 MAIN STREET DESIGNS INC 28839 (25) embroidered US Flag; (15) Neverfurl comp] 535.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC 1653 #10 Color Envelopes (5,000) 1657 Enabled: Business Cards - TH (500) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 3,000.00 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 11 Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False 20.00 06/25/2019 101-45201-433100 20.00 Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False 1,000.00 06/25/2019 601-49440-431990 1,000.00 Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 65.00 06/25/2019 226-45127-431992 65.00 Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: True 55.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 480.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425200 535.00 Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: True 1,132.28 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 2,830.70 06/25/2019 609-49750-425500 3,962.98 Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False 258.17 06/25/2019 602-49490-422100 12.90 06/25/2019 602-49490-422100 271.07 Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False 1,062.50 06/25/2019 101-43120-422600 1,062.50 Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: True 337.61 06/25/2019 101-41310-421990 52.00 06/25/2019 226-45122-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 389.61 1,710.59 1,711.56 3,422.15 935.58 46.00 214.29 1,195.87 2,787.00 2,787.00 558.60 558.60 230.00 230.00 35,919.30 35,919.30 5,150.00 5,150.00 4,067.00 4,067.00 Check Sequence: 64 06/25/2019 101-43120-421200 06/25/2019 101-43120-421200 Check Sequence: 65 06/25/2019 702-00000-441500 06/25/2019 702-00000-441500 06/25/2019 702-00000-441500 Check Sequence: 66 06/25/2019 601-49440-422700 Check Sequence: 67 06/25/2019 101-43120-422500 Check Sequence: 68 06/25/2019 101-42200-433100 Check Sequence: 69 06/25/2019 101-00000-217061 Check Sequence: 70 06/25/2019 101-45175-444310 Check Sequence: 71 06/25/2019 226-45127-431990 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False Page 12 Check Total: Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 21336306 (744) gal diesel @ $2.30 21336308 (822) gal unleaded @ $2..08 Check Total: Vendor: 1726 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES INV6447402 6/10/19 - 7/9/19 Contract Payment INV6447402 Supply Freight Fee INV6447403 6/10/19 - 7/9/19 Contract Payment Check Total: Vendor: 4638 MID AMERICA METER, INC. 019-2164 12" vertiflow meter; flow corn w/ 4-20 & pule; s Check Total: Vendor: 1827 MIDWEST LANDSCAPES 16207 (2) Japanses Lilac Trees Check Total: Vendor: 1351 MN FIRE SERVICE CERT BOARD 6610 MBFTE reimb.- (2) Fire Officer I Cert. Exam- 4. Check Total: Vendor: 5147 MN PEIP 857041 July - Health Insurance Check Total: Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER June 2019 Monthly Allocation - June 2019 Check Total: Vendor: 1821 MOOSE SHERRITT ICE ARENA 6/14/2019 2019 Mens Spring Hockey League Split Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 389.61 1,710.59 1,711.56 3,422.15 935.58 46.00 214.29 1,195.87 2,787.00 2,787.00 558.60 558.60 230.00 230.00 35,919.30 35,919.30 5,150.00 5,150.00 4,067.00 4,067.00 Check Sequence: 64 06/25/2019 101-43120-421200 06/25/2019 101-43120-421200 Check Sequence: 65 06/25/2019 702-00000-441500 06/25/2019 702-00000-441500 06/25/2019 702-00000-441500 Check Sequence: 66 06/25/2019 601-49440-422700 Check Sequence: 67 06/25/2019 101-43120-422500 Check Sequence: 68 06/25/2019 101-42200-433100 Check Sequence: 69 06/25/2019 101-00000-217061 Check Sequence: 70 06/25/2019 101-45175-444310 Check Sequence: 71 06/25/2019 226-45127-431990 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: True 1216965-00 (2) plug; (2) washer -seal 18.67 06/25/2019 101-45201-422100 Check Total: 18.67 Vendor: 5255 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False Pay Voucher #1 18C001 - 2018 Pedestrian Improvements - Pay , 191,350.90 06/25/2019 400-43300-459013 Check Total: 191,350.90 Vendor: 1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False 5709 2018 Annual TIF Reporting - TIF - 22 990.00 06/25/2019 213-46522-431990 Check Total: 990.00 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: True 24264 201911 - Spirit Hills - May 2019 2,206.68 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 24264 201907 - Spaeth PUD - May 2019 764.61 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 24264 201910 - Headwaters Senior CUP - May 2019 2,784.50 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 24264 201901 - PRG Mixed Use - May 2019 228.31 06/25/2019 101-41910-431990 24264 201901 - Gateway Music Office Use - May 201 S 224.90 06/25/2019 101-41910-431990 24264 201901 - Kjellberg PUD - Housing - May 2019 224.90 06/25/2019 101-41910-431990 24264 201901 - 503 Broadway Housing - May 2019 224.90 06/25/2019 101-41910-431990 24264 201916 - SPO Lot Split - May 2019 467.10 06/25/2019 101-00000-220110 24265 May 2019 Technical Assistance - Meetings 300.00 06/25/2019 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 7,425.90 Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: True 19006 parts- (75) fixture disconnect inline 2 -wire 113.25 06/25/2019 101-43120-421990 Check Total: 113.25 Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False 13688 (10.87) SPWEA240B 626.55 06/25/2019 101-43120-422400 13727 (5.01) AC Fines Mix 411.02 06/25/2019 101-43120-422400 Check Total: 1,037.57 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 2563673 resale - liquor 1,783.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2563673 freight 13.41 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2563674 freight 16.39 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2563674 resale - wine 699.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2564230 resale - liquor 1,835.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2564230 freight 38.73 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2565161 freight 16.51 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2565161 resale - liquor 1,278.59 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2565162 resale - liquor 144.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2565162 freight 5.96 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2567067 freight 1.79 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2567067 resale - liquor 123.94 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2567068 resale - wine 216.75 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 2567068 freight 8.94 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2567547 resale - liquor 506.44 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2567547 freight 4.77 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2567548 freight 61.08 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2567548 resale - wine n/a 202.50 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 2567548 resale - wine 1,918.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 2568107 resale - liquor 590.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2568107 resale - liquor 4.47 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2569067 resale - liquor 1,488.56 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2569067 freight 17.88 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2569068 freight 31.29 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2569068 resale - liquor 72.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2569068 resale - wine 1,088.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 2569068 resale - wine n/a 64.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 2571119 freight 29.80 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2571119 resale - liquor 2,592.70 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2571120 resale - wine 56.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 2571120 freight 7.45 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 2571120 resale - mix 129.80 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 2571576 resale - liquor 1,380.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2571576 freight 20.86 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 331407 resale - wine credit inv. #2557439 -56.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 331407 freight credit inv. #2557439 -1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 331408 freight credit inv. # 2559384 -1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 331408 resale - liquor credit inv. # 2559384 -102.55 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 331570 freight credit inv. # 2560294 -1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 331570 resale - liquor credit inv. # 2560294 -151.50 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 332157 resale - wine credit inv. # 2541615 -18.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 332158 resale - wine credit inv. # 2557439 -56.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 332396 resale - wine credit inv. # 2416577 -58.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 332978 resale - liquor credit inv. # 2564230 -66.20 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 332978 freight credit inv. # 2564230 -1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 15,933.40 640.00 640.00 7,943.75 7,943.75 549.36 549.36 270.28 270.28 375.00 375.00 21.00 21.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,575.00 1,575.00 18.08 Check Sequence: 79 06/25/2019 602-49490-422100 Check Sequence: 80 06/25/2019 226-45122-424100 Check Sequence: 81 06/25/2019 226-45125-425410 Check Sequence: 82 06/25/2019 101-45201-435100 Check Sequence: 83 06/25/2019 226-45127-431990 Check Sequence: 84 06/25/2019 226-45127-431992 Check Sequence: 85 06/25/2019 226-45127-431990 Check Sequence: 86 06/25/2019 101-42700-431200 Check Sequence: 87 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 15 Check Total: Vendor: 1443 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 37182 lift station repair - KSB handle -pump lifting; pro Check Total: Vendor: 5272 RAPIDS FOODSERVICE 7986846 Undercounter Dishwasher Check Total: Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC 750996 Food for Concession Resale Check Total: Vendor: 4962 RENGEL PRINTING COMPANY, INC 110609 (500) 11x18 brochures folded Check Total: Vendor: 5269 STEVEN JOHN SCHMIDT 6/14/2019 Music on the Missisisippi - 6/18/19 Check Total: Vendor: 3751 CHRISTINE SCHYMA 6/14/2019 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/30/19 Check Total: Vendor: 4975 JOSEPH SIMON 6/14/2019 6/27/19 Performance at Music on Mississippi Check Total: Vendor: 5211 RANDI ANN SMELSER June 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment Check Total: Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. 1828193 freight AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 15,933.40 640.00 640.00 7,943.75 7,943.75 549.36 549.36 270.28 270.28 375.00 375.00 21.00 21.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,575.00 1,575.00 18.08 Check Sequence: 79 06/25/2019 602-49490-422100 Check Sequence: 80 06/25/2019 226-45122-424100 Check Sequence: 81 06/25/2019 226-45125-425410 Check Sequence: 82 06/25/2019 101-45201-435100 Check Sequence: 83 06/25/2019 226-45127-431990 Check Sequence: 84 06/25/2019 226-45127-431992 Check Sequence: 85 06/25/2019 226-45127-431990 Check Sequence: 86 06/25/2019 101-42700-431200 Check Sequence: 87 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 15 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1828193 resale - liquor 1,897.10 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1828194 resale- wine 540.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 1828194 freight 15.40 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1831041 resale - liquor 4,124.75 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 1831041 freight 44.80 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1831042 freight 19.60 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 1831042 resale - wine 986.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 9174608 resale - liquor credit -10.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 Check Total: 7,635.73 Vendor: 4672 SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False 148975 (40) 50 lb. TWCA Sports Field Mix 4,910.00 06/25/2019 101-45201-421650 148993 (40) 25 lb. Ultra New Straw; (5) 1 gal Orn. Turf 563.90 06/25/2019 101-45201-421650 148993 50 lb. 3-4-5 Plant Starter Plus- Featherstone 47.10 06/25/2019 101-46102-421990 148993 (2) 50 lb. TWCA Sports Fld. Mix- Xcel Ballfield 354.16 06/25/2019 101-45203-421990 148993 Riverside- 50 lb. Pro. Landscape DT 139.65 06/25/2019 651-49010-421990 148993 Adopt a Park- 50 lb. 7-8-7 Veg & Flower 32.68 06/25/2019 101-45201-440900 Check Total: 6,047.49 Vendor: 4513 AARON STAEHNKE Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: True 6/14/2019 Famers Market Token Collection Log - 6/13/19 90.00 06/25/2019 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 90.00 Vendor: 5264 TERRY STEINBACH Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False Rvrfest 2019 Riverfest 2019 Appearance- 7-13-19- Hi -Way Li 1,000.00 06/25/2019 609-49754-425550 Check Total: 1,000.00 Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: True 763-271-3257 TDS 99.50 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 763-295-2005 TDS 20.16 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 763-295-3714 TDS 343.26 06/25/2019 702-00000-432100 Check Total: 462.92 Vendor: 4459 JAMES THARES Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: True 6/18/2019 Mileage Reimbursement - 2019 EDAM Conferej 133.40 06/25/2019 213-46301-433100 6/18/2019 Parking Reimbursement - 2019 EDAM Conferer 10.00 06/25/2019 213-46301-433100 Check Total: 143.40 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 16 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4859 TRIO SUPPLY COMPANY 539377 cs. nitrile gloves; (4) can liner; (6) pap. towels 1544 Check Total: Vendor: 4656 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC. 499923 resale - barware 499923 resale -lime salt Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Amount Payment Date Check Total: Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE 6/7/2019 PI 42 - UB June Billing (3,690 pcs) (1/2) 6/7/2019 Enabled: PI 42 - UB June Billing (3,690 pcs) (1/2) 344.61 Check Total: Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L 5/8/2019 344.61 Jan - March 2019 Cargill Lab Testing 90198576 July 2019 WWTP Operations & Maintenance Check Total: Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 2352554 Enabled: resale - soda pop 2359849 resale - soda pop 609-49750-425400 Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 234274 609-49750-425500 freight 234274 resale - liquor 234750 freight 234750 resale - liquor Check Total: Vendor: 5260 MIKE WALLEN 6-7-19 846.86 refund burials 7-11-16 -grave staking - Wallen 6-7-19 601-49440-432200 refund burials 7-11-16 -cremation- Wallen 6-7-19 refund burials 7-11-16 -Admn. fee- Wallen Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: False 344.61 06/25/2019 101-45201-421650 344.61 Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: False 381.24 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 11.99 06/25/2019 609-49750-425500 393.23 Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: False 846.86 06/25/2019 601-49440-432200 846.85 06/25/2019 602-49490-432200 1,693.71 Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: True 4,729.89 06/25/2019 602-49480-430800 60,125.00 06/25/2019 602-49480-430800 64,854.89 Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: True 408.65 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 322.60 06/25/2019 609-49750-425400 731.25 Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: True 12.50 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 722.75 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 2.50 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 106.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425100 843.75 Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: False 55.00 06/25/2019 651-49010-349410 80.00 06/25/2019 651-49010-349421 75.00 06/25/2019 651-49010-349400 210.00 Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 17 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 7445 May 2019 Water Testing 272.00 06/25/2019 601-49440-422740 Check Total: 272.00 Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: False 9118 Labor - Replace Ballast @ MCC 60.00 06/25/2019 226-45126-440100 9118 Labor - Replace Ballast @ Head End 60.00 06/25/2019 656-00000-202099 9118 Materials - Ballast & Wire Nuts to Replace Balla 27.94 06/25/2019 656-00000-202099 9118 Materials - Ballast & Wire Nuts to Replace Balla 27.94 06/25/2019 226-45126-440100 9129 Materials - Ballasts & Connectors (3) @ Library 84.24 06/25/2019 101-45501-440100 9129 Labor - Replace Ballasts (3) @ Library 120.00 06/25/2019 101-45501-440100 9130 Labor - wire new baler - Hi -Way Liquor 200.00 06/25/2019 609-49754-440100 9130 Materials- wire new baler - Hi -Way Liquor 131.45 06/25/2019 609-49754-440100 Check Total: 711.57 Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: True 108631 resale - wine 795.34 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 108631 freight 13.20 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 808.54 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: False 7237748 resale - wine 105.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 7237748 freight 1.49 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 7239227 resale - wine 560.00 06/25/2019 609-49750-425300 7239227 freight 7.45 06/25/2019 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 673.94 Vendor: 5261 SANDY WIPPER Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: False 06/07/2019 refund Rvrsd. burial - grave staking 60.00 06/25/2019 651-49010-349410 06/07/2019 refund Rvrsd. burial - cremation burial fee 80.00 06/25/2019 651-49010-349421 06/07/2019 refund Rvrsd. burial - Admin. fee 75.00 06/25/2019 651-49010-349400 Check Total: 215.00 Vendor: 5267 D. HELENE WOODS Check Sequence: 105 ACH Enabled: False 100 CMAB funded- MCC External Mural 5,000.00 06/25/2019 101-45204-431990 Check Total: 5,000.00 Vendor: 2645 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS Check Sequence: 106 ACH Enabled: False 105-19 2019 Assessment Contract 63,882.00 06/25/2019 101-41550-431250 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 18 Invoice No Description Acct Number Check Total: Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH 6/17/2019 Court Fines & Fees - May 2019 June June 2019 - Deputies Contract Check Sequence: 107 Check Total: Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER 201900000037 18C001 -2018 Pedestrian Improvement Easemer 117,834.17 Check Total: Vendor: 1582 WRIGHT COUNTY IT ARM19-016 (29) 2019 800 MHz Radio Infrastructure Fee Check Total: Total for Check Run: Check Sequence: 108 Total of Number of Checks: Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 63,882.00 Check Sequence: 107 ACH Enabled: True 3,021.06 06/25/2019 101-42100-430410 117,834.17 06/25/2019 101-42100-430500 120,855.23 Check Sequence: 108 ACH Enabled: False 184.00 06/25/2019 400-43300-459013 184.00 Check Sequence: 109 ACH Enabled: False 2,900.00 06/25/2019 101-42200-431990 2,900.00 915,868.70 109 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/24/19 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 1:37 PM) Page 19 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 06/19/2019 - 3:OOPM Batch: 00201.06.2019 - 00201.06.2019 USB Moiiii6effo Y Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 4263 CAYAN Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 1039360 5/2019 (3) machine rental 89.85 06/15/2019 609-49754-424100 1039360 5/2019 (15,975) Transactions 1,118.25 06/15/2019 609-49754-443980 Check Total: 1,208.10 Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 6/19/2019 Hi Way Liquor Sales Tax Accerlated Payment to 45,000.00 06/15/2019 609-00000-208100 May May Sales Tax - General 146.08 06/15/2019 101-00000-208100 May May Sales Tax - General -0.08 06/15/2019 101-00000-362900 May May Waste Tax - General 100.82 06/15/2019 101-00000-208120 May May Waste Tax - General -0.82 06/15/2019 101-00000-362900 May May Sales Tax - MCC 5,501.31 06/15/2019 226-00000-208100 May May Sales Tax - MCC -0.31 06/15/2019 226-45122-362900 May May Sales Tax - Water 1,363.79 06/15/2019 601-00000-208100 May May Sales Tax - Water 0.21 06/15/2019 601-49440-443990 May May Sales Tax - Cemetary 2.75 06/15/2019 651-00000-208100 May May Sales Tax - Cemetary 0.25 06/15/2019 651-49010-443990 May May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 54,308.58 06/15/2019 609-00000-208100 May May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 0.42 06/15/2019 609-49750-443990 Check Total: 106,423.00 Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True UB April 2019 5026 - Ellison Park 14.78 06/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB April 2019 5250- Bride Park W. 24.25 06/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB April 2019 5637- Meadow Oak Dog Park 5.60 06/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB April 2019 7224 - WWTP 1,440.56 06/15/2019 602-49480-438200 UB April 2019 7256-003 - Monti Arts 14.78 06/15/2019 101-45204-438200 UB April 2019 7256-007 - 103 Pine St - EDA 14.78 06/15/2019 213-46301-438200 UB April 2019 7885 - DMV/Help Center 24.25 06/15/2019 217-41990-438200 UB April 2019 8086 - 4th St. Warming House 14.78 06/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB April 2019 8114 - Hi -Way Liquor 82.94 06/15/2019 609-49754-438200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number UB April 2019 8117 - MCC 1,209.15 06/15/2019 226-45126-438200 UB April 2019 8119 - Fire Station 24.25 06/15/2019 101-42200-438200 UB April 2019 8120 - Bldg. Inspec, Garage 14.78 06/15/2019 101-41940-438200 UB April 2019 8177 - Library 87.13 06/15/2019 101-45501-438200 UB April 2019 8528 - NSP Softball Field 14.78 06/15/2019 101-45203-438200 UB April 2019 8622 - Pioneer Park bathrooms 14.78 06/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB April 2019 8631 - Animal Shelter 14.78 06/15/2019 101-42700-438200 UB April 2019 8903 - PW Shop/Clerical 732.68 06/15/2019 101-43127-438200 UB April 2019 8904 - PW Vehicle Storage 95.56 06/15/2019 101-43127-438200 UB April 2019 8905 - PW Office 14.78 06/15/2019 101-43127-438200 UB April 2019 10128 - 118 6th St. W Bldg 15.28 06/15/2019 101-41941-438200 UB April 2019 14476 - Ellison House - FINAL 22.46 06/15/2019 101-45201-438200 Check Total: 3,897.13 Vendor: 4470 US BANK - BONDS Check Sequence: 4 1399969 GO Bonds 2016A - Interest - Street Reconstructi 41,725.00 06/15/2019 320-47000-461100 1400815 GO Bonds 2014A - Interest 75,830.63 06/15/2019 318-47000-461100 1400815 GO Bonds 2014A - Interest 4,473.75 06/15/2019 703-00000-461100 1400818 GO Bonds 2015B - Interest Street Reconstructioi 26,425.00 06/15/2019 319-47000-461100 1400827 GO Bonds 2017A - Interest 53,320.00 06/15/2019 321-47000-461100 1401829 GO Bonds 2018A - Interest -Tax Abatement 98,720.84 06/15/2019 322-47000-461100 Check Total: 300,495.22 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 5 06/06/2019 Runnings - return clamp; (2) o rings -12.77 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Runnings - coupling 0.79 06/15/2019 101-43130-421990 06/06/2019 USPS - flouride sample postage for MDH 4.39 06/15/2019 601-49440-432200 06/06/2019 Fastenal - (13) sign repair small parts 7.04 06/15/2019 101-43120-422600 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - (2) CBC-20HB 7.44 06/15/2019 101-43120-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - backpack choke knob 7.71 06/15/2019 101-45201-422100 06/06/2019 Runnings - 4pk gaskets 7.99 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Runnings - 12 -gal superbox- case for smoke mac 8.59 06/15/2019 101-42200-422100 06/06/2019 Runnings - (5) keyblank master lock- Ellison Ki( 9.95 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 O'Reilly - (2) fuse; 2AMP blade 10.17 06/15/2019 101-43120-421990 06/06/2019 Cub - resale (8) limes; (8) lemons 10.42 06/15/2019 609-49750-425500 06/06/2019 O'Reilly - #147 - power RTD Belt 11.17 06/15/2019 101-43120-422100 06/06/2019 O'Reilly - #147 - power RTD Belt- Streets 11.17 06/15/2019 101-43120-422100 06/06/2019 CWP - (4) hydraulic adapter 12.12 06/15/2019 101-43120-422110 06/06/2019 Titan Machine - #121-(2) pincoiled hvy 3/8 x 2 1 12.70 06/15/2019 101-43120-422100 06/06/2019 Fastenal - (81) small parts for distance signs- Xc 14.78 06/15/2019 101-45203-421990 06/06/2019 DSG - pvc cap 6" 16.45 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2019 Runnings - (4) gloves - 1/2 Water 8.38 06/15/2019 601-49440-420650 06/06/2019 Runnings - (4) gloves - 1/2 Sewer 8.38 06/15/2019 602-49490-420650 06/06/2019 Auto Value - permatex the right- Shop supply 16.99 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Runnings - hedge shear 17.17 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Fastenal - (40) bolts for street signs 21.67 06/15/2019 101-43120-422600 06/06/2019 Runnings - (2) 64 oz. car was 8.98 06/15/2019 101-42200-421100 06/06/2019 Runnings - 12' HDMI cable 14.49 06/15/2019 101-42200-421990 06/06/2019 Home Depot - (6) 50 lb. concrete mix 23.88 06/15/2019 101-43130-421990 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - (6) rubber metal clamps 23.94 06/15/2019 101-45203-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - 2pk. 1" clamp boom round; tank clea 24.53 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Home Depot - (5) key Arts Building 24.90 06/15/2019 101-45204-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - faucet extension; valve ball 26.48 06/15/2019 101-43127-422100 06/06/2019 Runnings - (15) .75CF Top Soil 26.85 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Runnings -nozzle for Toro sprayer; tank cleaner 27.98 06/15/2019 101-45201-422100 06/06/2019 Runnings -(10) 24 pk. water 29.90 06/15/2019 101-42200-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - (6) engine oil; (3) bulk bin 31.21 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Holiday -Sd. #5- (8.065) gal. unleaded @ $2.749 22.17 06/15/2019 101-42200-421200 06/06/2019 Holiday - Squad 5 car wash 10.74 06/15/2019 101-42200-421990 06/06/2019 Monti Napa -#116 - (3) Napagold oil filters 35.15 06/15/2019 101-43120-422110 06/06/2019 Martie's - (6) pel lime- Featherstone Pk. 35.70 06/15/2019 101-45201-421600 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - #113 - steering stabilizer 36.11 06/15/2019 101-43120-422110 06/06/2019 Runnings - (3) Aloe Gator Spray 38.97 06/15/2019 101-43120-420650 06/06/2019 Delegard Tools - met thread wizard; sae thrd. wi: 40.66 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 PayPal - Nomar Supply- parts for smoke machin 41.00 06/15/2019 101-42200-422100 06/06/2019 Primo Pizza - (4) pizzas delivered - Arts 41.18 06/15/2019 101-45204-421990 06/06/2019 Home Depot - (8) 60 lb. mortar mix- repair basir 43.76 06/15/2019 101-43130-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - hardware cloth; wire pk- 50' gale.- A 45.89 06/15/2019 101-45204-421990 06/06/2019 Martie's -(7) accent flowers; (4) 4pk flowers 46.45 06/15/2019 101-45201-421600 06/06/2019 NBP - (2) cs paper towels 49.14 06/15/2019 609-49754-421990 06/06/2019 Cub -resale (200) limes 50.00 06/15/2019 609-49750-425500 06/06/2019 Runnings - valve gate; pvc weld kit; pipe thread 50.11 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 NBP -cs cups hot; (2) 8pk tape; spoons; forks 162.49 06/15/2019 609-49754-421990 06/06/2019 USPS - roll stamps PW office 55.00 06/15/2019 101-43110-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - (4) adapter; (2) pk. saw blades 56.94 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - pry bar handle; 6pc. roll spring punct 61.05 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Runnings - canvas tarp for black top 62.99 06/15/2019 101-43120-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - 2pc. rainsuit; stormflex pants 66.98 06/15/2019 101-45201-421990 06/06/2019 Dan & Jerry's - (2) 1 gal. perennial; (13) qt. pere: 70.71 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 AT & T - DirectNet- 4/2019 (2) FirstNet Mobile 76.46 06/15/2019 101-42200-432100 06/06/2019 Runnings - back pak blower repair parts 88.65 06/15/2019 101-45201-422100 06/06/2019 Olson & Sons - (2) 50W Lamp clear 92.34 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Fastenal - (24) red safety marking; paint (12) wh 102.68 06/15/2019 101-43120-421510 06/06/2019 Cornerstone Ford - #229 - brake inspec; oil & fli 118.60 06/15/2019 101-45201-422110 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - (8) hose end fittings; (12) weather; 123.50 06/15/2019 101-43127-422100 06/06/2019 Fastenal - (24) each white inert. marking; safety 127.10 06/15/2019 101-43120-421510 06/06/2019 Aspin Mills - (14) uniform insignia 141.50 06/15/2019 101-42200-421120 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - carb.kit; (2) fuel fltr; (10) EP Moly 162.29 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Sherwin Williams - (5) gal white - Arts 171.72 06/15/2019 101-45203-421990 06/06/2019 Central Landscape - Redmond Linden 2" 193.00 06/15/2019 101-43120-422500 06/06/2019 Dan & Jerry's - Adopt a Park - asst. annuals 257.00 06/15/2019 101-45201-440900 06/06/2019 Dyna- (100) crimp & shrink bullet end; (50) cbl. 257.09 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 Fire Cam - 32GB Fire Cam 4K 315.90 06/15/2019 101-42200-421990 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - (26) asst fuel; air; oil filters 348.73 06/15/2019 101-43127-422120 06/06/2019 US CAD - Revu Perpetual License- add 1 seat 349.00 06/15/2019 101-42400-421990 06/06/2019 Auto Value - #155- (2) disc brake caliper; (2) ro 269.43 06/15/2019 101-45201-422110 06/06/2019 Sherwin Williams - (10) gal ext. fl. ultra (cybersl 431.68 06/15/2019 101-45204-421990 06/06/2019 Home Depot - Adopt a Park - (48) asst plants 477.06 06/15/2019 101-45201-440900 06/06/2019 F1agShooter - flag shooter; (1000) flags 509.75 06/15/2019 101-43120-421990 06/06/2019 Lube Tech - replace seal on rear cylinder 529.06 06/15/2019 101-43127-440100 06/06/2019 General Rental - bucket lift 567.00 06/15/2019 101-45204-421990 06/06/2019 Central Hydraullics - #111 repair dump truck cyl 614.74 06/15/2019 101-43120-422110 06/06/2019 CWP - compactor - hydrl. cylinder 4x32 welded 626.66 06/15/2019 101-43127-422100 06/06/2019 M -R Signs - (1000) chip seal markers 654.85 06/15/2019 101-43120-422600 06/06/2019 Ameripride - uniforms April - Parks 127.36 06/15/2019 101-45201-441700 06/06/2019 Ameripride - uniforms April - Sewer 86.20 06/15/2019 602-49490-441700 06/06/2019 Ameripride - uniforms April - Water 86.20 06/15/2019 601-49440-441700 06/06/2019 Ameripride - uniforms April - Streets 165.96 06/15/2019 101-43120-441700 06/06/2019 Ameripride - Shop towels April 247.95 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 CWP - #105- cylinder welded end; 3000 psi hyd. 818.53 06/15/2019 101-43120-422110 06/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.402 gals @ $2.639 27.45 06/15/2019 217-41990-421200 06/06/2019 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription (WO 44.99 06/15/2019 101-41520-443300 06/06/2019 Amazon - Credit on Coffee Purchase due to Pact -15.88 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 Von Hanson Snacks - Flavored Pretzels (18) 29.88 06/15/2019 226-45125-425410 06/06/2019 Home Depot - Filters for DMV 10.18 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 06/06/2019 Sherwin Williams - 1 Gal Paint for Break Room 41.02 06/15/2019 101-41940-421990 06/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.046 gals @ $2.639 23.87 06/15/2019 217-41990-421200 06/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 1.669 gals @ $2.749 fo 4.59 06/15/2019 226-45126-422990 06/06/2019 Home Depot - Oil for Leaf Blower; Shelf Peg 5.88 06/15/2019 226-45126-422990 06/06/2019 Martie's - Softner Salt (63 bags) 371.70 06/15/2019 226-45126-422990 06/06/2019 Office Max - Sign Holder, Clipboard Case, Clod 80.84 06/15/2019 226-45122-421990 06/06/2019 USPS - Mail Certified Letter 4.80 06/15/2019 101-42400-432200 06/06/2019 USPS - Mail Certified Letter 4.65 06/15/2019 101-42400-432200 06/06/2019 Costco - PW Lunch Meeting 5/22/19 (Buns, Bur, 159.81 06/15/2019 101-43110-421990 06/06/2019 Freehand Hostel - Lodging GFOA Conference - 273.25 06/15/2019 101-41520-433100 06/06/2019 NBP - Note Pads, Pens, 42.17 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 NBP - Post Its, Binder Clips, Tape 34.24 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2019 NBP - Paper, Forks, Post Its 158.95 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 NBP - Paper, Markers 49.78 06/15/2019 226-45122-421990 06/06/2019 NBP - Binders (6) 49.16 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 NBP - Packing Tape, Labels 87.88 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 123 Signup - APA Virtual Congress On Demand 55.00 06/15/2019 101-41520-433100 06/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Cold Packs (20) for Ballfields 40.60 06/15/2019 226-45127-421740 06/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 41.45 06/15/2019 101-45501-421990 06/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Napkins for Concessions 60.06 06/15/2019 226-45125-421990 06/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Cold Packs for Friendship Islani 40.60 06/15/2019 226-45127-421990 06/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4019361356 19.60 06/15/2019 101-45501-431990 06/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4020204642 19.60 06/15/2019 101-45501-431990 06/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4019361412 49.23 06/15/2019 226-45126-431990 06/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4020622035 43.23 06/15/2019 226-45126-431990 06/06/2019 Minncor - Titles (2) 70.00 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Resistance Bands for Classes (10) 129.80 06/15/2019 226-45127-421720 06/06/2019 Amazon - Resistance Bands (10); Wireless Mica 149.79 06/15/2019 226-45127-421720 06/06/2019 National Gym Supply - End Caps for Seat Slider 23.94 06/15/2019 226-45126-422990 06/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4021522994 43.92 06/15/2019 226-45126-431990 06/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4020621499, 4021522690 50.75 06/15/2019 217-41990-431990 06/06/2019 Mailfinance - Postage Machine Lease Payment ( 564.33 06/15/2019 101-41310-441500 06/06/2019 Verizon - 3/21/19 - 4/20/19 35.01 06/15/2019 101-43115-432100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 3/21/19 - 4/20/19 61.03 06/15/2019 101-43120-432100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 3/21/19 - 4/20/19 359.99 06/15/2019 101-45201-432100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 3/21/19 - 4/20/19 55.35 06/15/2019 101-45201-432100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 3/21/19 - 4/20/19 179.99 06/15/2019 601-49440-432100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 3/21/19 - 4/20/19 180.00 06/15/2019 602-49490-432100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 3/21/19 - 4/20/19 27.11 06/15/2019 601-49440-432100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 3/21/19 - 4/20/19 27.11 06/15/2019 602-49490-432100 06/06/2019 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (DMV) 21.28 06/15/2019 217-41990-431990 06/06/2019 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (CH) 21.28 06/15/2019 101-41310-431990 06/06/2019 ThyssenKrupp - Maintenance Agreement (5/l/lS 615.63 06/15/2019 226-45126-431900 06/06/2019 E Lifeguard - Whistles & Lanyards for Pool Stat 42.36 06/15/2019 226-45124-421110 06/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.578 gals @ $2.699 25.85 06/15/2019 217-41990-421200 06/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.170 gals @ $2.839 28.87 06/15/2019 217-41990-421200 06/06/2019 MCFOA - Membership Dues (JS) 46.00 06/15/2019 101-41410-443300 06/06/2019 USPS - Certified Letters (2) 13.70 06/15/2019 101-42400-432200 06/06/2019 Cub - Snacks for CPR/AED Training 24.47 06/15/2019 101-41800-443990 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - Replace Battery in Van 100.79 06/15/2019 226-45126-422990 06/06/2019 utx - Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (21) 1,719.67 06/15/2019 101-45130-444140 06/06/2019 utx - Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (6) 491.94 06/15/2019 101-45130-444140 06/06/2019 utx - Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (17) 1,294.00 06/15/2019 101-45130-444140 06/06/2019 utx - Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (3) 504.00 06/15/2019 101-45130-444140 06/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - MCC - Ma: 4,193.00 06/15/2019 226-45126-431100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - City Hall - 718.00 06/15/2019 101-41940-431100 06/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - Head End - 606.38 06/15/2019 656-00000-202099 06/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - Prairie Cen 536.00 06/15/2019 101-41941-431100 06/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - Library - M 1,769.62 06/15/2019 101-45501-431100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 3/21/19 - 4/20/19 140.04 06/15/2019 101-42200-432100 06/06/2019 Amazon - Sharpie Permanent Markers 14.16 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Paper, Barcode Scanner 321.98 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 06/06/2019 NBP - POS Paper 5.38 06/15/2019 226-45122-421990 06/06/2019 Verizon - 4/4/19 - 5/3/19 20.71 06/15/2019 601-49440-432100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 4/4/19 - 5/3/19 20.71 06/15/2019 602-49490-432100 06/06/2019 Amazon - AddressLabels, Batteries, Flash Drive 173.78 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 Home Depot - Filters for Food Shelf 9.48 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 06/06/2019 Home Depot - Valve, Tubing Cutter, Pipe Tape - 27.25 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 06/06/2019 Home Depot - Sandpaper - Faucet Repair 3.85 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 06/06/2019 NBP - Certificate Holder, Cups, Portfolio Folder 133.28 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 Domino's Pizza - Fire Station Lunch Meeting 28.60 06/15/2019 101-42200-443990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Paper, Calculator 118.97 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 06/06/2019 St Anthony Main Garage - Parking MCSC Meeti 7.00 06/15/2019 101-43111-433100 06/06/2019 ZZZNEP Treasure Island Center Parking - Emerl 10.00 06/15/2019 101-42500-433100 06/06/2019 Runnings -hedge shear cr tax -1.18 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Runnings -(4) washer fluid 6.36 06/15/2019 101-42200-421990 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - fuel filter 6.67 06/15/2019 101-43127-422120 06/06/2019 Auto Value - tin handle; spreader; (4) mixing cul 7.32 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 U of M Parking - Utility 8 8.00 06/15/2019 101-42200-433100 06/06/2019 Dyna- (100) washer flats 8.03 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - (2) Torpedo alum 9" level 12.98 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 Fleet Farm - picture wire; access cable 14.15 06/15/2019 602-49490-421990 06/06/2019 MN Equipment - #217 - adjuster; spacer 22.94 06/15/2019 101-45201-422100 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - (2) powerated belt 29.50 06/15/2019 101-43120-422100 06/06/2019 Home Depot - wall mount key safe 30.97 06/15/2019 101-45204-421990 06/06/2019 Home Depot -4'x6' US flag 36.98 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Cub - Gatorade (6) 8pk; (2) bottles - Fire 37.94 06/15/2019 101-42200-421990 06/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4020622019; 4021086301 146.35 06/15/2019 609-49754-431990 06/06/2019 Martie's - Riverside Cemetery- 25# Shady; (5) a 84.00 06/15/2019 651-49010-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - (3) US Flags 4'x 6' 89.97 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Cub - resale (1) bx limes; (15) lemons 113.34 06/15/2019 609-49750-425500 06/06/2019 Runnings - (3) auto cut 25-2; Stihl part 124.88 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Hirshfields - Ellison bathrooms (2) gal. exterior; 124.92 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Amazon - (3) sunscreen wipes; 200 ct. lense wip 160.49 06/15/2019 101-45204-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - waders for cleaning lift stations 169.99 06/15/2019 602-49490-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - (6) 3' x 5' flags 179.94 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Arctic Glacier - resale inv. 1956912309; 195691 396.29 06/15/2019 609-49750-425500 06/06/2019 Arctic Glacier - resale inv. 1956913308 412.44 06/15/2019 609-49750-425500 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2019 Martie's -Adopt a Park- (24) accent; (10) baskets 490.88 06/15/2019 101-45201-440900 06/06/2019 Sprayer Depot - hose reel; roller; 100' hose; spray 653.23 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Allina Health- Qrt. 2 2019 - keep medicals up to 1,293.70 06/15/2019 101-42200-431990 06/06/2019 TRS - Keystroke software; total care renewal- H 1,699.31 06/15/2019 609-49754-431900 06/06/2019 DSG - wheel - F/205 ridgid 7.33 06/15/2019 601-49440-421990 06/06/2019 DSG - wheel - F/205 ridgid 7.33 06/15/2019 601-49440-421990 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - Trailer W(570) 15.39 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4021522956; 4021967142; 402238 169.27 06/15/2019 609-49754-431990 06/06/2019 Home Depot - Adopt a Park - (3) hang. bskt; (2) 130.70 06/15/2019 101-45201-440900 06/06/2019 DSG - replacement valve for rental meter 133.98 06/15/2019 601-49440-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - grease gun; 20v. battery 169.99 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 Runnings - mag. hooks;(6) snips; ((3) pliers; etc 225.04 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 DSG -(2) valve ball; (2) thread brass st. bend; (2; 50.94 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 WHCE - Sunset Ponds Lift Station 450 kWh 131.15 06/15/2019 602-49490-438100 06/06/2019 WHCE - 1645 & 1675 CR 39 48.14 06/15/2019 602-49490-438100 06/06/2019 WHCE - DMV 19.95 06/15/2019 217-41990-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - 2171 W. River St.- Parks 36.45 06/15/2019 101-45201-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave. NE - Water 19.95 06/15/2019 601-49440-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - MCC 27.95 06/15/2019 226-45126-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - 207 Chelsea Rd- Water 32.95 06/15/2019 601-49440-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - 209 Cedar St. - Water 29.95 06/15/2019 601-49440-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE -132 E. Broadway - Water 29.95 06/15/2019 601-49440-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - 107 River St. W. 19.95 06/15/2019 101-45201-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - Hi -Way Liquor - June 2019 21.42 06/15/2019 609-49754-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - MCC - June 2019 19.95 06/15/2019 226-45126-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - 200 Dundas - June 2019 29.95 06/15/2019 601-49440-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - 909 Golf Course Rd. - June 2019 19.95 06/15/2019 101-43110-431900 06/06/2019 WHCE - General Street Lighting 1,326.16 06/15/2019 101-43160-438100 06/06/2019 Nighthawk- June 2019 security monitor/cellular 49.95 06/15/2019 101-42200-431900 06/06/2019 PayPal - Ahredi - reduced pressure backflow pre 150.00 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 PayPal - Stover's - reduced pressure zone asseml 175.00 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Dyna- 26' steel tool box 235.77 06/15/2019 101-45201-421990 06/06/2019 Facebook - Advertising for Programs 10.00 06/15/2019 226-45122-434990 06/06/2019 Facebook - Advertising for Music on the Mississ 8.73 06/15/2019 226-45127-431992 06/06/2019 Facebook - Advertising for Farmers Market 0.27 06/15/2019 226-45127-431992 06/06/2019 NBP - Wall Pockets Files (2) - for EAP's 30.20 06/15/2019 226-45122-421990 06/06/2019 Cub - Pop, Water for Rotary Meeting 19.36 06/15/2019 213-46301-443990 06/06/2019 Walmart - Supplies for Safety Month 86.46 06/15/2019 101-41800-421990 06/06/2019 Target - Food for Special City Council Meeting ( 47.97 06/15/2019 101-41110-443990 06/06/2019 Cub - Fruit Bowl for Census Complete Count Cc 19.99 06/15/2019 101-41410-443990 06/06/2019 Recreation Supply - Pool Brush 52.17 06/15/2019 226-45126-422990 06/06/2019 Treasure Island - ZZZNEP - Lodging for NEI Tr 110.46 06/15/2019 101-42500-433100 06/06/2019 Verizon - 4/11/19 - 5/10/19 25.02 06/15/2019 101-43115-432100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2019 City of St.Michael -Seminar "Preparing for a Ho 30.00 06/15/2019 101-41310-433100 06/06/2019 24 Hr Wristbands - Wristbands for Walk & Roll 177.00 06/15/2019 226-45122-421990 06/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Cups 37.07 06/15/2019 226-45127-421981 06/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Straws, Cups, Food Gloves for 1 316.15 06/15/2019 226-45125-421990 06/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom/Lockerroom Supplies 1,204.57 06/15/2019 226-45126-421990 06/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom/Lockerroom Supplies 1,135.15 06/15/2019 226-45126-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Birthday Party Paper Plates 55.90 06/15/2019 226-45123-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Birthday Party Paper Plates 67.96 06/15/2019 226-45123-421990 06/06/2019 Constant Contact - 1 Yr Bulk Email Subscriptior 182.87 06/15/2019 101-41310-431990 06/06/2019 Constant Contact - 1 Yr Bulk Email Subscriptior 182.88 06/15/2019 101-43110-431990 06/06/2019 Constant Contact - 1 Yr Bulk Email Subscriptior 182.88 06/15/2019 609-49754-431990 06/06/2019 Constant Contact - 1 Yr Bulk Email Subscriptior 182.87 06/15/2019 226-45122-431990 06/06/2019 Aldi - Beverages for Resale @ Farmers Market 21.63 06/15/2019 226-45125-425410 06/06/2019 Sams Club - Safety Month Supplies 122.34 06/15/2019 101-41800-421990 06/06/2019 Target - Food for Special EDA Meeting (5/29/19 45.98 06/15/2019 213-46301-443990 06/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.515 gals @ $2.749 26.16 06/15/2019 217-41990-421200 06/06/2019 Runnings - lead sampling kits 4.79 06/15/2019 601-49440-421990 06/06/2019 Fastenal - #109 (6) M10-1.5xI00mm DIN931 6.01 06/15/2019 101-43120-422110 06/06/2019 O'Reilly -(2) auto fuse 6.78 06/15/2019 101-43120-421990 06/06/2019 Martie's -mouse magic 8.49 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Dollar Tree - Arts - mise. supplies 25.00 06/15/2019 101-45204-421990 06/06/2019 Freightliner - #109 -drain plug 27.21 06/15/2019 101-43120-422110 06/06/2019 Runnings - bolt grip extractor; eled. dremel engn 54.74 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - (2) adj. cone nozzle; (2) trigger valve 117.46 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - 6pk 3 -ring binder; stapler; 4pk binders 66.69 06/15/2019 101-43110-421990 06/06/2019 Olson & Sons - #106 - 240v. limit switch 39.94 06/15/2019 101-43120-422100 06/06/2019 DISH - June 2019 service 76.99 06/15/2019 609-49754-432500 06/06/2019 Treasure Island - ZZZNEP lodging for NEI trair 110.46 06/15/2019 101-42500-433100 06/06/2019 Locators & Supply- (6) 36" lute bar scrated blade 143.61 06/15/2019 101-43120-421990 06/06/2019 Home Depot -(3) tile nipper; (6) lineman plier; ( 216.24 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Royal Tire #124 - 1 tire mount/dismount 266.61 06/15/2019 101-43120-422200 06/06/2019 Galls - Relief Donation/CPE grant- Wildland bo( 271.99 06/15/2019 101-42200-421120 06/06/2019 Spectrum Supply- (2) cs. can liners 83.94 06/15/2019 101-43120-421990 06/06/2019 Spectrum Supply- (6) es. can liners; (20) bx. glo, 556.20 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Martie's (6) 50# Tuff Turf - BCOL 648.00 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Martie's -Adopt a Park- (6) visits for soil; annual 2,975.99 06/15/2019 101-45201-440900 06/06/2019 Arctic Glacier - resale inv. 195 6915 110; 14007; 734.91 06/15/2019 609-49750-425500 06/06/2019 Freightliner - #105- replace rear springs; pin & b 6,385.96 06/15/2019 101-43120-440500 06/06/2019 Runnings -sprayer backpack 119.95 06/15/2019 101-43127-421990 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - #109 - rubber metal clamp; battery 10.78 06/15/2019 101-43120-422110 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - filter 16.48 06/15/2019 601-49440-422100 06/06/2019 PayPal - Parts Wrhs- cover fan; hex screw; wam 26.52 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Monti Napa - (12) 1OW30 qt. 27.48 06/15/2019 602-49490-421300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2019 Fleet Farm -(2) nitrile gloves; valve; barb adapte 54.62 06/15/2019 601-49440-421990 06/06/2019 MCS Meters - Intergrated RP2 Fire Hydrant met 1,899.00 06/15/2019 601-49440-422701 06/06/2019 Ausco Designs - (25) baseball hats w/ logo - Par] 212.50 06/15/2019 101-45201-421110 06/06/2019 Amazon - Key Lock Box, Packaging Tape. Oval 65.95 06/15/2019 101-43110-421990 06/06/2019 EDAM - Summer Conference Registration 6/12- 315.00 06/15/2019 213-46301-433100 06/06/2019 Amazon - Label Printer, Power Strips (2), Coffef 176.27 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Magenta Ink Tank 59.31 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 Super Shuttle - GFOA Shuttle from Airport to Hi 19.00 06/15/2019 101-41520-433100 06/06/2019 Amazon - Paper, Pens 41.37 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Oil Change Stickers 4.89 06/15/2019 101-45201-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Coffee, Kleenex 128.97 06/15/2019 101-41310-421990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Birthday Parry Napkins 94.92 06/15/2019 226-45123-421990 06/06/2019 Von Hanson Snacks - Flavored Pretzels (43) 66.40 06/15/2019 226-45125-425410 06/06/2019 Amazon - Slap Bracelets, Glowsticks, Candy for 81.42 06/15/2019 101-45130-444140 06/06/2019 Amazon - Coffee 23.52 06/15/2019 101-43110-421990 06/06/2019 Dollar Tree - Misc Items foe Walk & Roll Handc 32.14 06/15/2019 217-41990-443990 06/06/2019 Walmart - Snacks for Employee Training 26.89 06/15/2019 101-41800-443990 06/06/2019 Xcel Parking - Preferred Plan & Prelim Modelin, 33.00 06/15/2019 101-41310-433100 06/06/2019 Runnings - Sanding Wheel 3.09 06/15/2019 226-45126-422990 06/06/2019 Runnings - Reimbursement on Sales Tax Paid in 0.23 06/15/2019 226-00000-115030 06/06/2019 Banners.com - Banner for Music on the Mississi] 92.22 06/15/2019 226-45127-431990 06/06/2019 Banners.com - Banner for Walk & Roll 92.22 06/15/2019 101-45130-444140 06/06/2019 NBP - Paper, Staples, Candy 33.55 06/15/2019 217-41990-421990 06/06/2019 Trusted Employees - Background Checks - May 37.00 06/15/2019 101-45201-431990 06/06/2019 Trusted Employees - Background Checks - May 92.00 06/15/2019 609-49754-431990 06/06/2019 Trusted Employees - Background Checks - May 37.00 06/15/2019 101-43120-431990 06/06/2019 Vista Print - Birthday Invitations (150) 122.65 06/15/2019 226-45123-421990 06/06/2019 MN Softball - MN Softball League Sanction Fee 300.00 06/15/2019 226-45127-421740 06/06/2019 American Red Cross - Training Materials 75.00 06/15/2019 226-45124-421990 06/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.753 gals @ $2.639 25.74 06/15/2019 217-41990-421200 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 37,080.29 06/15/2019 101-43230-438400 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 - Recycling 13,292.70 06/15/2019 101-43230-438400 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 - Recycling 2,983.84 06/15/2019 101-00000-208120 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 35.80 06/15/2019 101-43127-438400 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 47.74 06/15/2019 101-45201-438400 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 23.87 06/15/2019 101-45201-438400 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 113.38 06/15/2019 602-49480-438400 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 208.87 06/15/2019 226-45126-438400 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 23.87 06/15/2019 609-49754-438400 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 23.87 06/15/2019 101-45201-438400 06/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - April 2019 11.93 06/15/2019 101-45501-431990 06/06/2019 Amazon - Moto Z2 Force Case w/ clip 10.29 06/15/2019 101-43110-421990 06/06/2019 DSG - C plug repair pvc 10.36 06/15/2019 101-42200-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2019 Home Depot - (2) 4x8 plywood 32.10 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Auto Value - (2) organic vapor masks 48.98 06/15/2019 101-45201-422100 06/06/2019 Amazon - Squade 5- dash cam; memory card; m 78.32 06/15/2019 101-42200-421990 06/06/2019 General Rental - seeder 224.26 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Sherwin Williams - (25) gal white - Ballfields 286.20 06/15/2019 101-45203-421990 06/06/2019 Dan & Jerry's -Adopt Park- annuals & perennial; 339.77 06/15/2019 101-45201-440900 06/06/2019 Home Depot-18C003-CONSTR- microwave w/ 368.10 06/15/2019 400-43300-452010 06/06/2019 Martie's - 600# Tuff Turf 600.00 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 Galls -- Relief Donation/CPE Grant- (5) Wildlan 1,412.22 06/15/2019 101-42200-421120 06/06/2019 General Rental - bucket lift 139.00 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 General Rental - seeder 242.00 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 General Rental - Deposit on Buck Lift 50.00 06/15/2019 101-45201-421650 06/06/2019 US Bank - Quarterly Rebate -7,610.86 06/15/2019 101-00000-362970 06/06/2019 Amazon - oscillating tower fan 39.99 06/15/2019 101-43110-421990 06/06/2019 Border States - (72) C batteries; (2) Duracell Lit 86.16 06/15/2019 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 109,916.83 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 00009818816 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - May 2019 57.98 06/15/2019 601-49440-443980 00009818816 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - May 2019 57.98 06/15/2019 602-49490-443980 Check Total: 115.96 Vendor: 2405 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges/Returns Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True June 2019 Liq Store CC Fees (WF -0990) 7,214.81 06/15/2019 609-49754-443980 June 2019 WF account interest earnings -134.35 06/15/2019 101-00000-362110 June 2019 UB CC Fees (AmEx -8910) 26.46 06/15/2019 601-49440-443980 June 2019 CH CC Fees (WF -0999) 398.12 06/15/2019 101-41520-443980 June 2019 MCC CC Fees (WF Counter -0997) 1,142.66 06/15/2019 226-45122-443980 June 2019 MCC CC Fees (iAccess FM -1476) 95.14 06/15/2019 226-45127-431992 June 2019 MCC CC Fees (WF Online -0996) 215.02 06/15/2019 226-45122-443980 June 2019 UB CC Fees (AmEx -8910) 26.46 06/15/2019 602-49490-443980 June 2019 MCC ACH Returns 06/2019 167.00 06/15/2019 226-00000-115031 June 2019 WF account bank charges 1,341.23 06/15/2019 101-41520-443980 June 2019 UB CC Fees (Bluefin) 3,473.45 06/15/2019 602-49490-443980 June 2019 UB CC Fees (Bluefin) 3,473.45 06/15/2019 601-49440-443980 Check Total: 17,439.45 Vendor: 1565 WELLS FARGO CORP TRUST SERVICE Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 6/6/2019 Additional Investment to RBC Capital Markets 40,000.00 06/15/2019 955-00000-104010 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 40,000.00 Total for Check Run: 579,495.69 Total of Number of Checks: The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/24/19 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/19/2019 - 3:00 PM) Page 11 City Council Agenda: 6/24/2019 2B. Consideration of approvinu new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees Name Stephanie Pula Name Sawyer McCalla Elizabeth Halsted NEW EMPLOYEES Title Department Liquor Store Clerk Liquor Store TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Reason Voluntary Voluntary New Hire and Terms City Council 2019: 6/19/2019 Hire Date 6/13/19 PT Class Department Last Day Class MCC MCC 5/15/19 PT 5/28/19 PT City Council Agenda 06/24/2019 2C. Consideration of approvinu the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2019-42 accepting donations of $250 from TDS Telecom and $400 from Communitv United Methodist Church for Fire Department Wildland Gear, a donation of plants (value of $187) from EB Gardens for Parks Department, a donation of $450 from All 4 Kids for Power of Produce Kids Club and Color Me Fall event, and a donation of $1,500 from Wright Countv Area United Wav for Power of Produce Kids Club (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is being asked to approve the following donations: • $250 from TDS Telecom for Fire Department Wildland Gear • $400 from Community United Methodist Church for Fire Department Wildland Gear • Plants (value of $187) from EB Gardens for Parks Department • $450 from All 4 Kids for Power of Produce Kids Club and Color Me Fall event • $1,500 from Wright County Area United Way for Power of Produce Kids Club As required by state statute, if the city accepts a donation, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donations will be used toward the mentioned events. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Resolution 2019-42 accepting the contribution and authorizing use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2019-42 CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2019-42 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY TDS Telecom Community United Methodist Church EB Gardens All 4 Kids Wright County Area United Way DESCRIPTION VALUE Cash $250 Cash $400 Plants $187 Cash $450 Cash $1,500 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY TDS Telecom Community United Methodist Church EB Gardens All 4 Kids Wright County Area United Way PURPOSE/AMOUNT Wildland Fire Gear/$250 Wildland Fire Gear/$400 Plants/$187 Power of Produce Kids Club and Color Me Fall/$450 Power of Produce Kids Club/$1,500 Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 24th day of June, 2019. Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-45 accepting a grant from Central Minnesota Arts Board in the amount of $9,400 for public art at the Monticello Communitv Center (TP/JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider a grant contribution from the Central Minnesota Arts Board for public art at the community center. The grant will fund public art done by Helene Woods that will consist of five large panels that will be mounted to the exterior of the MCC. A preview of the artist's style and a preliminary sketch of the design will be provided during a MontiArts update during the meeting. The artwork will take several months to complete and will be installed late this year or early next spring. It will be installed by Parks Department staff. Al. Budget Impact: CMAB grant will pay for public art that was not budgeted. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The Arts Consultant will work with the artist and the Parks Superintendent will coordinate with MCC staff on installation. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2019-45 accepting the grant from Central Minnesota Arts Board for the sum of $9,400 for public art at the Monticello Community Center. 2. Motion to deny Grant. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2019-45 CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2019-45 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM CENTRAL MINNESOTA ARTS BOARD IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,400 WHEREAS, The City of Monticello applied for a grant from the Central Minnesota Arts Board for public art — mural on exterior of Monticello Community Center; and WHEREAS, The City of Monticello was notified by the Central Minnesota Arts Board that the City received a grant award for the above project in the amount of $9,400. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREB Y RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO: That the City Council authorizes accepting a grant of $9,400 from Central Minnesota Arts Board. Adopted by the Monticello City Council this 24th day of June, 2019. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in coniunction with Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello on Saturdav, July 13, 2019. Applicant: Monticello Chamber of Commerce (JS/PW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of the use of Ellison Park, as well as related City assistance for park set-up, for the Art in the Park and the Taste of Monticello event. The event is coordinated by the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and is proposed to occur on Saturday, July 13, 2019. The event hours are 8 a.m. — 3 p.m., however, the Chamber of Commerce is requesting use of the park beginning at 5:00 a.m. Although the narrative does not request tear -down time after 3:00 p.m., that time is customarily accounted for as part of event approval, therefore, the event approval would allow use of the park for this event from 5:00 a.m. — 5 p.m. The Chamber noted that some vendors choose to set up the night before, however, this is at their own risk. The Chamber has indicated that it will be responsible for set-up and tear -down related to the event, and will provide required portable satellites and waste disposal services. They cover a portion of the cost of those facilities for this event, although they will already be in place as part of the Riverfest event. The Sheriff's Office has reviewed this application and is working with the Chamber and any law enforcement concerns that may arise in the park. Parking and the additional traffic in town will be handled with the on -duty Monticello deputies. The Chamber will also coordinate with the Sheriff's Department for traffic control and security purposes. City Public Works staff have previously been involved with assisting in park preparation. The request is to allow such assistance, along with waiver of park rental fee to continue for 2019. In addition, Chamber will coordinate utility locates with public works. Al. Budget Impact: There is the potential for a minor loss of revenue for park rental for the date Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello occurs at Ellison. No other budget impact is anticipated. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The Parks Department staff will assist during the week prior to the event preparing for this activity, in addition to other Riverfest activities planned for Ellison Park. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Art in the Park/Taste of the Town celebration on July 13, 2019. 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 in favor of the Special Event permit for Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello. City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello Narrative B. Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello Maps C. Certificate of Liability Insurance CITY Of CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Special Event Permit MonticdoMonticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . inf� oci.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address q11 Rio& Property Legal Description Property ID Number _ PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Owner Name �(�,�� � Owner Address �, — 1 WVVV Owner Phone � �L �_' Owner Email jy��%p �'�1�w>lM�'1c'Orl0 : ft, .ik K Applicant Name M Of ` Applicant Address 'pp "; I Vve Applicant Phone 1(,t �� "� V � �„ (N) Applicant Email t L't �W Name of Event Location/Address of Event��r6,p�(' i Dates & Times of Event 31 ` , V1 Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 1 APPLICANT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECK A written narrative including: 1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will function on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other information necessary to fully describe the request; and 2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use. 3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on the site plan shall include but not be limited to: 1. The location of all existing and proposed structures; 2. Driveways and parking areas; 3. Proposed storage spaces; 4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc; S. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable). If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to a site plan. Certificate of insurance/liability coverage. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above. Application fee of $50.00. Special Event Review Process CITY CHECK-IN • The City Clerk will review all Temporary Use Permit applications. • Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. • Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. • A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the City Clerk has determined the use shall: • Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; • Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; • Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; 07/25/16 Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria, cont. • Not include permanent alterations to the site; • Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends; • Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site; • Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and • Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands. • Not create an unreasonable risk of significant: 1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear; 2. Injury to persons; 3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances; 4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel; 5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and 6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare. The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event. The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the City Clerk's Office is authorized to impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require: 1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress. 2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat. 3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards. 4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities. 5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal. 6. Provision of security and safety measures. 7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event. 8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities. 9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection. 10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition. Duration of Permit A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the City Clerk. 07/25/16 3 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) Applicant's Statement (Date) This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signature) CITY APPROVAL `— J (City Clerk Signature) (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal_ review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete (Date) , (Date) (Date) Approved ❑ I Denied ❑ Admin Parks Streets Director 07/25/16 4 Special Event Permit -2019 Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello Saturday, July 13, 2019, 8:00 am -3:00 pm Description of event -This event has been in existence for 27 years. It takes place on the banks of the Mississippi River in Ellison Park from 8AM-3PM. Although it is not part of Riverfest, it does run at the same time as our community festival. Chamber staff/volunteers will mark the grass in the park with spray paint the day before the event. Some vendors choose to set up the night before however, it is at their own risk. Wright County Sheriff department is aware that there could be some vendors set up early. Most vendors begin to set up on Saturday at SAM. Vendors bring tents and product to the park. Restaurants and local entertainment require electricity. Wes Olson Electric assists with electrical set up and ensures everything works properly. Wright County Sheriff are onsite during the entire event. No alterations are made to the City Park for this event. Monticello Chamber carries appropriate insurance coverage. To my knowledge, there has not been an adverse effect from hosting Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello in the past. The Monticello Chamber pays a portion of portable toilet expense and waste disposal to Riverfest for using facilities already in place in the park for this event. Chamber staff alerts the Sheriff's department of our event when vendors set up early and this typically encourages more patrols during the evening before the event. Riverfest serves beer out of the Lion's Den during the event. They also hold the bean bag tournament on the East end of the park. The Lion's hold the liquor license and insurance liability for this part of the day. V) c aA �N L 0 U +-+ F- 0 . O J 0 _Z buo Y C � Q a O 1 Z Q LU i = O LU 1z = Q C LY O F�- Z +_+ W 0 U U (D Z_ Y LY L1 O C Z W LU Ln LU L w WASHINGTON AVE. Ln r-1 ri m r -i N r -I r -I O 00 n Ln d' M N Ln G O Of Ln W r-1 Tt 00 N T-1 Rzt cn r-1 r-1 Itt C) 0 O 01 N M N N X N M MIl - r4 M Tl- k.0 N M Ln Ln N M ,�o I :*- r'4 m M M N M N M 0O 001mI N N Ln I r1 RZI- tZ C) t0 d' t� O 911- (10 Tt Ln ,,:T Lr) O I�l Ln Ln j r-1 lD 0 Ln Ln N Ln Ln Ln m Ln Ln Z 0 LY (D Q t1 S�JOaN3A 0333DUNOW 30 31Sd1 I— L 4.0 F- U W W uF UJ UJ ... z M o0 oW Q Q v zN p x 0 Ln co Z E c`v Ln N E I— N LyW N LL Y ON p ``— em Z m h LL 0 0 o Z O ■. ■S © O z �— Q W W w > W E LU o V LL 0 * U. W N 0 IMS LL Z o 75 O � � w Ln d� > r O Li a (n Q- N O Ln I r1 RZI- tZ C) t0 d' t� O 911- (10 Tt Ln ,,:T Lr) O I�l Ln Ln j r-1 lD 0 Ln Ln N Ln Ln Ln m Ln Ln Z 0 LY (D Q t1 S�JOaN3A 0333DUNOW 30 31Sd1 I— N W W L7 � Z z Q H N Y Z O W Q J W N 0 LL Z cc�— wz LU W m�-- r'"mmm"N OP ID: MS '4411:7,111CW" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE(M7/20 06/07/20 9 19 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Foster White Agency, Inc. PHONE Jake Olinger FAX 114 West 3rd Street (A/C No, EXt):763-295-2614 (A/C No): 763-295-3010 Monticello, MN 55362 I E-MAIL Jacob Olinger ADDRESS: jolinger@foster-white.com PRODUCER MONTI-4 CUSTOMER ID #: I INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED Monticello Chamber of Commerce INSURER A : West Bend Mutual Insurance Co 15350 PO Box 192 I Monticello, MN 55362 INSURER B INSURER C INSURER D INSURER E: INSURER F : COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL'SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR INSR WV[) POLICY NUMBER (MM/DDNYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A X l COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X NSO 1078042 04/20/2019 04/20/2020 DAMAGE TO RENTED 100,000 PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY n .PECOT- n LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS A X HIRED AUTOS A X NON -OWNED AUTOS X UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR A EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE DEDUCTIBLE X RETENTION $ 10,000 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ N / A (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A D & O Liability PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) Cit of Monticello is named as an Additional Insured in respect to General Liability. RE: Art in the Park/Taste of of Monticello and Party in the Park CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jacob Olinger © 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ NSO1078042 04/20/2019 PROPERTY DAMAGE $ 04/20/2020 (PER ACCIDENT) NSO1078042 04/20/2019 04/20/20201 $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000 NUO 2097834 04/20/2019 04/20/2020 $ WC STATU- TH- IOER ORY IM ITS E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ NNO 1088832 04/20/2019 04/20/2020 Aggregate 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) Cit of Monticello is named as an Additional Insured in respect to General Liability. RE: Art in the Park/Taste of of Monticello and Party in the Park CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jacob Olinger © 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2G. Consideration to approve a Special Event Permit allowinz use of West Bridge Park, citv streets and related assistance for the Partv in the Park on July 10, 2018. Applicant: Monticello Chamber (JS/PW/AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of a special event permit for Party in the Park. Party in the Park replaces the Chamber's annual Downtown Block Party and is occurring on Wednesday, July 10, 2019. Council approval is requested for use of West Bridge Park for the event. As part of the approval, the City Council is asked to consider the closure of River Street from the corner of Hwy 25 to the corner of Walnut Street. The applicant has requested that the street be closed between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. to accommodate volunteer set-up and take-down before and after the event. The event itself will occur 5 — 9 p.m. In specific, the application lists the following requested City assistance: • Close River Street — Hwy 25 to Walnut (7 a.m. — 10 p.m. on July 10) • "No parking" signs posted at West Bridge Park parking spaces (7 a.m. on July 10) • Street barricades ( 7 a.m. on July 10) - Walnut Street at River Street - River Street at Hwy 25 - Entrance/Exit to City parking lot • Pedestrian crosswalk markers (7 a.m. July 10) • Trash receptacles, picnic tables, traffic cones (July 10) • Approval of the use of city parking lots in the downtown area including Cedar Street garden center (July 10) The Chamber has also requested permission to place a sign in front of the water treatment plant on East Broadway and a sign at West Bridge Park advertising the event. Chamber will coordinate utility locates with public works. City staff will be working with the Chamber of Commerce to mark the pedestrian routes into the event from the Walnut Street parking lot. The Sheriff's Office has been in contact with the Chamber and will assist with any law enforcement concerns that may arise during the block party. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff impacts are as noted above and include drop-off and pickup of barricades, placement of "No Parking" signage, picnic tables and trash/recycling receptacles. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing use of West Bridge Park and temporary closing of River Street from 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. on Wednesday, July 10, 2019, including the use of public parking facilities, staff resources and amenities as described in the Special Event Permit application, contingent on: a. Continued site coordination with Streets Superintendent and Parks Superintendent. b. Verification of notification of adjacent property owners by permit holder. City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Party in the Park Application B. Party in the Park Site Plan/Map C. Certificate of Liability Coverage CITY Of CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, suite 1 Special Event Permit MonticefloMonticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . info (aci.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist Property Address Property Legal Description Property ID Number Owner Name Owner Address Owner Phone Owner Email Applicant Name Applicant Address Applicant Phone Applicant Email Name of Event Location/Address of Event Dates & Times of Event Y lr� WOL- .%-AA-Ak iZ\1 &1VNA a,,,,) I I ti a ►N1. rn , Q A C _ R i\ Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 1 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. H (Signature) (Date) f� , 7_� , 9i CITY AP l)V L (City Clerk Signature) (Date) (Community Development Director Signature) (Date) Special Event Permit Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete Admin Parks Streets Director 07/25/16 4 Party in the Park (Downtown Block Party) Information Sheet Date: Wednesday, July 10th 2019 Time: 5:OOPM - 9:OOPM Place: West Bridge Park, 107 River St E, Monticello See attached map Attachments provided: Layout of Party in the Park Certificate of Insurance - Event Certificate of Insurance - Liquor by Monticello VFW Overview: The Party in the Park is being sponsored by all interested downtown and Chamber businesses. This event is being sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce. It is open to the public and is with the purpose of promoting the downtown area, bringing awareness to the public of all of the businesses located downtown and as a way to bring the community together for a day of inexpensive fun. Insurance Information: Event Insurance - Insurance for the event has been secured through the sponsorship of the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Foster White Insurance Agency. The City of Monticello has been named as additional insured on the policy See attached event insurance information. Liquor Service & Insurance - The Monticello VFW is providing the permit & insurance and will be at the event. They will have a representative at the event to oversee the sale of beer at the event. We have secured one officer from the Wright County Sherrifs Office as well as two reserves who will be on-site from 5:00-9:OOpm The Monticello VFW has a liquor license, and liquor liability insurance which will name The City of Monticello as additional insured for this event. See attached licenses and insurance information. Street & Parkina Lot Closinq Information: We are requesting the temporary closing of River Street, from the corner of Hwy 25 to the corner of Walnut St next to stairway. (see map) Wednesday, July 10th from 7AM - 10:00 PM. We are also requesting temporary NO PARKING signs be posted at the parking spaces to West Bridge Park. Wednesday, July 10th to begin at 7 AM through 10PM. This will ensure that their will not be any parked cars in the area at 7AM Wed. Citv Equipment and Assistance Requested: See attached site map for details. Assistance We are asking the city for assistance in the following ways - Place as indicated the following items No Parking Signs at the parking spaces at West Bridge Park by 7AM on Wed. 7/10/19 Street barricades 7 AM on Wed. 7/10/19 Cones 7AM on Wed. 7/10/19 Pedestrian crossing markers 7AM on Wed. 7/10/19 Picnic tables 9AM on Wed. 7/10/19 Secure permission to place a black sign on the grassy area in front of the water treatment plant on East Broadway. (no assistance needed - just permission) Equipment (10) Trash Cans (25) Picnic Tables (10) orange cones (4) Stop for Pedestrians in Cross Walk Signs in the downtown area (if available) No Parking Signs Street Barricades Walnut Street at River Street River Street at Hwy 25 Entrance/Exit to City parking lot OP ID: MS CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITYINSURANCE DATE(M06/07/207/20 9 I 19 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER I CONTACT Jake Olinger Foster White Agency, Inc.NAME 114 West 3rd Street CIC No. Exft 763-295-2614 ! �A/c No): 763-295-3010 Monticello, er 55362 I E-MAIL olin er foster-white.com Jacob Olinger ADDRESS: J g PRODUCER MONTI-4 CUSTOMER ID #: INSURED Monticello Chamber of Commerce PO Box 192 Monticello, MN 55362 ( INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE l INSURER A :West Bend Mutual Insurance Co INSURER B INSURER C INSURER D: INSURER E INSURER F NAIC # '15350 COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL'SUBR' POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR INSR WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X NSO 1078042 04/20/2019 04/20/2020 I DAMAGE TO RENTED 100,000 CLAIMS -MADE ®OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ I MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) City of Monticello is named as an Additional Insured in respect to General Liability. RE: Art in the Park/Taste of of Monticello and Party in the Park CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jacob Olinger © 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD PERSONAL & ADV INJURY I $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE I $ 2,000,000 GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG I $ 2,000,000 1. POLICY n PRO- IECT LOC I $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT I $ 1,000,000 (Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS I BODILY INJURY (Per accident) I $ A SCHEDULED AUTOS X HIRED AUTOS NSO 1078042 04/20/2019 04/20/2020 PROPERTY DAMAGE $(PER ACCIDENT) A X NON -OWNED AUTOS NSO 1078042 04/20/2019 04/20/2020 $ I$ UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR HCLAIMS-MADE EACH OCCURRENCE I $ 1,000,000 A EXCESS LIAB NUO 2097834 AGGREGATE $ 04/20/2019 04/20/2020 1,000,000 DEDUCTIBLE I $ X RETENTION $ 10,000 I $ WORKERS COMPENSATION I WC I OTH- ANDD EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y� LIMITS ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT I $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N / A (Mandatory in NH) I E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYE $ If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below I E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ A D & O Liability NNO 1088832 04/20/2019 04/20/2020 JAggregate 1,000,000 - DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) City of Monticello is named as an Additional Insured in respect to General Liability. RE: Art in the Park/Taste of of Monticello and Party in the Park CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jacob Olinger © 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2H. Consideration of approving an application for temporary on -sale liquor license for the VFW Post 8731 for Monticello Chamber of Commerce Partv in the Park event on Julv 10, 2019 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The VFW is requesting approval of a 1 -day temporary on -sale liquor license application for the Chamber of Commerce Party in the Park event to be held on Wednesday, July 10, 2019. The VFW will provide a certificate of insurance for this event. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the temporary one day liquor license. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 for approval of the applications. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Application for temporary on -sale liquor license 1 City of Monticello Special Permit Liquor License — City Festival Name of organization USS Dorchester VFW Post 8731 Address 713 S Cedar Street Name of person ma ing application Date(s) Avent July 13th 2019 Organization officer's name (Todd Roberts Organization officer's name Organization officer's name Organization officer's name Location where permit will be used. If -an outdoor area, describe. Date or anized Fee VU 11$10/event City State Zip Code (Monticello I IMN 55362 Business phone Home phone 763 295 3792 II Type of organization ❑ Club ❑ Charitable ❑ Religious Other non-profit City State Zip Code IMonticello I MN (55362 City State Zip C IIMinnesota I City State Zip Code I 1 I IMinnesota I City State Zip Code IMinnesota I I Poe If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Signature City Clerk or County Official City Council Agenda: 6/24/2019 2I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-43 approving the issuance of general obligation bonds, series 2019A (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The attached resolution authorizes the mayor and city administrator to approve the sale of $8,000,000 in bonds with a true interest cost not to exceed 3.5%. The bond issue proceeds will finance Fallon Avenue overpass and other street improvements, fire hall construction, and fire truck acquisition. Reimbursement resolutions for expenditures made in advance of the debt issuance were adopted by council at prior meetings. Debt service payments will be made with a mix of property taxes and a special assessment. The first interest payment is due June 15, 2020 and the first principal (plus interest) payment is due December 15, 2020. The 2020 draft budget includes debt service on this issue. Total annual debt service is estimated at $750,000 for the 2019 bonds. Over $5 million, this debt issue does not qualify for the small -issuer exception for debt issued by the city in 2019. The small -issuer exception allows the city avoid costly future arbitrage rebate calculations associated with spend down requirement timelines. The city will secure the services of a pricing opinion provider to assess the competiveness of this negotiated bond sale. The approximate $2,000 cost of this service will be rolled into the bond issue. Al. Budget Impact: Detailed above. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Internal coordination of issuance - otherwise little to no impact on the staff. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2019-43 approving the issuance of general obligation street reconstruction and improvement bonds, series 2019A. 2. Motion to deny Resolution 2019-43 approving the issuance of general obligation street reconstruction and improvement bonds, series 2019A. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff supports Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2019-43 B. Finance Plan CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2019A ISSUER: City of Monticello, Minnesota BODY: City Council KIND, DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF MEETING: A regular meeting held on Monday, June 24, 2019, at 6:30 p.m., in the City Offices MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Documents Attached: Extract of Minutes of said meeting. RESOLUTION 2019-43 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2019A I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS MY HAND officially as such recording officer on June 24, 2019. City Clerk EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, STATE OF MINNESOTA HELD: Monday, June 24, 2019 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, State of Minnesota, was duly held on Monday, June 24, 2019 at 6:30 p.m. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2019-43 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2019A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (herein, the "City"), as follows: 1. The City Council hereby finds and declares that it is necessary and expedient for the City to sell and issue its fully registered general obligation bonds in the total aggregate principal amount not to exceed $8,000,000 (herein, the "Bonds"). The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance infrastructure improvements, including the Fallon overpass, purchase equipment, finance fire hall improvements, and the costs of issuing the Bonds. 2. The City Council desires to proceed with the sale of the Bonds by direct negotiation with Northland Securities, Inc. (herein, "NSI"). NSI will purchase the Bonds in an arm's-length commercial transaction with the City. 3. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to approve the sale of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $8,000,000 and to execute a bond purchase agreement for the purchase of the Bonds with NSI, provided the true interest cost is less than 3.50%. 4. Upon approval of the sale of the Bonds by the Mayor and the City Administrator, the City Council will take action at its next regularly scheduled or special meeting thereafter to adopt the necessary approving resolutions as prepared by the City's bond counsel. 5. NSI is authorized to prepare an Official Statement related to the sale of the Bonds. 6. If the Mayor and the City Administrator have not approved the sale of the bonds to NSI and executed the related bond purchase agreement by December 31, 2019, this resolution shall expire. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Executive Summary The following is a summary of the recommended terms for the issuance of $8,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A (the "Bonds' or "2019A Bonds'). Additional information on the proposed finance plan and issuing process can be found after the Executive Summary, in the Issue Overview and Attachment 3 - Related Considerations. Purpose Proceeds from the Bonds will be used to fund the final phase of the Fallon overpass project, purchase a fire truck, finance improvements to the Fire Hall, and finance street improvements. Security The Bonds will be a General Obligation of the City. The City will pledge for payment of the Bonds: • Special assessments collected from benefitted properties. • Property tax levies. • Annual tax abatement levy. Repayment Term The Bonds will mature annually each December 15 in the years 2020 - 2034. Interest on the Bonds will be payable on June 15, 2020 and semiannually thereafter on each June 15 and December 15. Estimated Interest Rate Average coupon: 2.47% True interest cost (TIC): 2.65% Prepayment Option Bonds maturing on and after December 15, 2028 will be subject to redemption on December 15, 2027 and any day thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest. Rating A rating will be requested from Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's"). The City's general obligation debt is currently rated "A2" by Moody's. Tax Status The Bonds will be tax-exempt, bank qualified obligations. Risk Factors There are certain risks associated with all debt. Risk factors related to the Bonds are discussed in Attachment 5. Type of Bond Sale Negotiated Sale Pricing Date Thursday, August 22, 2019 Council Consideration Monday, August 26, 2019 @ 6:30 P.M. Northland Securities, Inc. Page 1 Issue Overview Purpose Proceeds from the Bonds will be used to fund the final phase of the Fallon overpass project, purchase a fire truck, finance improvements to the Fire Hall, and finance street improvements. The Bonds have been sized based on estimates provided by City staff on June 13, 2019. The table below contains the sources and uses of funds for the bond issue. Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds Tax Street Issue Abatement Equipment CIP Improvements Summary $1,040,000.00 $1,290,000.00 $5,350,000.00 $320,000.00 $8,000,000.00 Total Sources $1,040,000.00 $1,290,000.00 $5,350,000.00 $320,000.00 $8,000,000.00 Uses Of Funds Deposit to Project Construction Fund 1,020,000.00 1,265,000.00 5,260,000.00 310,000.00 7,855,000.00 Total Underwriter's Discount (1.400%) 14,560.00 18,060.00 74,900.00 4,480.00 112,000.00 Costs of Issuance 3,685.49 4,571.44 18,959.07 1,134.00 28,350.00 Rounding Amount 1,754.51 2,368.56 (3,859.07) 4,386.00 4,650.00 Total Uses $1,040,000.00 $1,290,000.00 $5,350,000.00 $320,000.00 $8,000,000.00 Authority The Bonds will be issued pursuant to the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and 429, as well as Sections 469.1812-469.1815, 412.301, and 475.521. Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815 do not authorize the actual "abatement of taxes." Instead, the City has the ability to levy a property tax (an abatement levy) that is equivalent to taxes that could be abated. The City will certify a property tax abatement levy to pay the debt service on the Bonds. A public hearing was held on June 26, 2017 and the City Council adopted a resolution approving the property tax abatement for this purpose. Under Section 412.301, Capital Equipment includes, but is not limited to, road construction and maintenance equipment, public safety equipment and computer hardware and software, which must have a useful life at least as long as the term of the debt issued to finance the equipment. The term of the Bonds cannot exceed 10 years from the date of issuance. If the amount of the Equipment Portion of the Bonds exceeds 0.25% of the estimated market value of the taxable property in the City, a reverse referendum provision applies. The City's estimated market value for taxes payable in 2019 is $1,974,154,400 ($1,974,154,400 x 0.0025 = $4,935,386). Since the Equipment Portion of the Bonds does not exceed $4,935,386, the reverse referendum provision does not apply. Before issuing bonds under Section 475.521 with a Capital Improvement Plan ("CIP"), the City must hold a public hearing on the CIP and the proposed bonds, and must then approve the CIP and authorize the issuance of the bonds by at least a 3/5 majority. If a petition signed by voters equal to at least 5 percent of the votes cast in the last general election requesting a vote on the issuance of bonds is received by the clerk within 30 days after the public hearing, then the bonds may not be issued unless approved by the voters at an election. The hearing was held on August 13, 2018, and the 30 day reverse referendum period has expired. Structure The Bonds have been structured to result in each portion having relatively level annual debt service payments over the life of the Bonds. The Abatement portion has a 13 -year term to match the length of the previous bond issues associated with the Fallon Overpass project. The Northland Securities, Inc. Page 2 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-44 to accept a $162,550.57 Deputv Registrar Reimbursement Grant from the Minnesota Department of Public Safetv and authorize execution of the grant agreement and liabilitv release. (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Legislation recently signed by Governor Walz included an appropriation of $13 million for deputy registrar reimbursement grants related to the development and deployment of MNLARS (Minnesota License and Registration System) in 2017. To receive the $162,550.57 grant, the city must execute a grant agreement and liability release. The release does not waive or release any right or claim against the state for actions occurring after execution of the agreement and release. Implementation of the new licensing system resulted in higher costs per transaction and longer customer wait times. Measuring per transaction cost was made more difficult by what the new system counted as a transaction. Net revenue per hour worked dipped in 2017 and 2018 to $19 per hour as compared to $23 per hour in 2016. Al. Budget Impact: The city will receive $162,550.57 in unrestricted funds. A2. Staff Workload Impact: There would be no impact on the staff by this action. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2019-44 accepting a $162,550.57 Deputy Registrar Reimbursement Grant from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and authorize execution of the grant agreement and liability release. 2. Motion to not adopt Resolution 2019-44 accepting a $162,550.57 Deputy Registrar Reimbursement Grant from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and authorize execution of the grant agreement and liability release. 3. Other C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2019-44 B. Letter from MDPS Driver and Vehicle Services C. Grant agreement and Liability Release CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2019-44 RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT A $162,550.57 DEPUTY REGISTRAR REIMBURSEMENT GRANT FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT AND LIABILITY RELEASE WHEREAS, the city owns and operates a local Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV); and WHEREAS, the city has incurred additional costs associated with the deployment of MNLARS; and WHEREAS, legislation recently signed by the governor appropriates $13,000,000 for deputy registrar reimbursement grants; and WHEREAS, the acceptance of the city's portion of the grant ($162,550.57) is a complete settlement of all disputes existing between the state and city from development and deployment of MNLARS, but does not waive or release rights or claims arising after the execution of the grant agreement and liability release; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello hereby accepts the grant with all of its conditions and authorizes the Finance Director as the Deputy Registrar Appointee to execute the grant agreement and liability release. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 24th day of June, 2019. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The above resolution was introduced by Councilmember and was duly seconded by Councilmember The following voting in favor: The following voted in opposition: CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on June 24, 2019, and recorded in minutes of said meeting. Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Notary Public: Date: (STAMP) Driver and Vehicle Services 445 Minnesota Street • Suite 190 • Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-5190 Driver Services Phone: 651.297.3298 • Vehicle Services Phone: 651.297.2126 Fax: 651.797.1120 • TTY: 651.282.6555 dps.mn.gov The state calculated the grant amount using the formula specified in the legislation: • 10% of available funds allocated equally among all deputy registrars; • 45% of the available funds allocated proportionally based on the number of transactions where a filing fee was retained by the deputy registrar from August 1, 2017 through December 31, 2018 compared to the total number of transactions where a filing fee is retained by all deputy registrars; and EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER June 6, 2019 Alcohol and Gambling Mr. Wayne Oberg Enforcement Deputy Registrar 2 Bureau of 119 East 3rd Street Criminal Monticello, MN 55362 Apprehension Driver and Vehicle Services Subject: Deputy Registrar Reimbursement Grant Emergency Application Deadline: June 30, 2019 Communication Networks Homeland Security and Dear Mr. Oberg: Emergency Management Minnesota State Patrol Legislation recently signed by Governor Walz included an appropriation of $13 million for deputy Office of registrar reimbursement grants related to the development and deployment of the Minnesota License Communications and Registration System (MNLARS). Office of Justice Programs - The amount of the reimbursement grant for your office location is $162,660.57. Office of Pipeline Safety To receive the reimbursement, you must submit the following on or before June 30, 2019. Office of . Fully completed and signed grant agreement. Traffic Safety • Fully completed and signed release form. State Fire Marshal The state calculated the grant amount using the formula specified in the legislation: • 10% of available funds allocated equally among all deputy registrars; • 45% of the available funds allocated proportionally based on the number of transactions where a filing fee was retained by the deputy registrar from August 1, 2017 through December 31, 2018 compared to the total number of transactions where a filing fee is retained by all deputy registrars; and EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER June 6, 2019 Deputy Registrar Reimbursement Grant Page 2 • 45% of available funds allocated proportionally based on the number of transactions where a filing fee is retained by each deputy registrar from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2017 compared to the total number of transactions where a filing fee is retained by all deputy registrars. Enclosed is the grant agreement, release form, instructions for completing and submitting the forms, and a return certified mail envelope. To receive the reimbursement grant you must complete and return the forms on or before June 30. If you have any questions, please email DVS Deputy Director Jeffrey Schmitz at ieffrev.schmitzO,state.mn.us or call 651-201-7584. Sincerely, Dawn M. Olson Director, Driver and Vehicle Services i *l Grant Agreement Minnesota Department of Public Safety ("State") Driver and Vehicle Services 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 195 St. Paul, MN 55101 Grantee (Fill in information - Print): Organization Name: Deputy Registrar Name: Deputy Registrar Address: Remittance Address: Tax Identification Number: Phone: State's Authorized Representative: Jeffrey Schmitz, Jeffrev.schmitz(a).state.mn.us, 651-201-7584 Page 1 of I Grant Program: MN Session Laws- 2019 Is` Special Session, Chapter 3, Article 1, Section 6 & Article 2, Section 36 Grant Agreement Term: Effective Date: 6/01/2019 Expiration Date: 7/31/2019 Grant Agreement Amount: $162,660.57 Deputy Registrar No.: 002 Under Minn. Stat. § 299A.01, Subd 2 (4) the State is empowered to enter into this grant agreement. Term: Effective date is the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 1613.98, subd. 5 and 7. Once this grant agreement is fully executed, the Grantee will receive reimbursement pursuant to the Payment clause of this grant agreement. Per MN Session Laws- 2019 1" Special Session, Chapter 3, Article 1, Section 6 & Article 2, Section 36. The Grantee Agrees to: Comply with all requirements in the request and release agreement. Per MN Session Laws- 2019 1 st Special Session, Chapter 3, Article 1, Section 6 & Article 2, Section 36. Payment: The State will disburse the reimbursement within 30 days of the request and release agreement being returned. No later than July 31, 2019. Per MN Session Laws- 2019 1st Special Session, Chapter 3, Article 1, Section 6 & Article 2, Section 36. 1. GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant agreement on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. Signed:_ Print Name: Title: Date: Signed: Print Name: Title: Date: 2. STATE AGENCY Signed: Title: Date: INSTRUCTIONS FOR DEPUTY REGISTRAR REIMBURSEMENT GRANT Questions Please direct questions related to the reimbursement grant to: • By email: DVS Deoutv Director Jeffrev Schmitz at ieffrev.schmitzCa2state.mn.us • By phone: 651-201-7584 Application Deadline You must submit the grant agreement and release form on or before June 30. 2019. as stipulated in the legislation (HF6). Late submissions cannot be accepted. Forms The grant agreement and release form are enclosed. ADDointees for multiple office locations must complete a set of forms for each office location. Organization Name: Legal name of deputy registrar office (e.g. Auto Club of Minneapolis). Deputy Registrar Name: Office location and number (e.g., St. Louis Park 001). Deputy Registrar Address: Provide your office location address. Remittance Address: Indicate where the state should mail the reimbursement grant. The deputy registrar address and remittance address may be the same. Tax Identification Number: Enter the organization's nine -digit federal tax identification number (FEIN/EIN). Grant Agreement Signature Requirements Citv/County Offices. state law defines which city and county officials are authorized to sign contracts, including grant agreements, as follows: • Statutory Cities, Minn. Stat. 412.201: Mayor and City Clerk (both must sign), • Charter Rule Cities, Minn. Stat. 410: As defined in the charter. • Counties, Minn. Stat. 375.13: Board Chairperson (as attested to by the Clerk of the County Board) You must also submit a copy of the resolution that was passed accepting the grant disbursement of funds to verify the person(s) authorized to sign the contract. If cities or counties wish to designate someone other than those defined in Minnesota statutes to sign the grant agreement, they must pass a council/board resolution. A copy of that resolution must be submitted with the grant agreement. For Drivate business, the signature must be by the business owner or someone with proper authority to sign contracts as given in articles of incorporation. Release Form Complete and sign the attached release form. Submit grant agreement, release form, and any supporting documents: • By mail: Send by certified mail using the enclosed return mail envelop to submit all relative documents • Mail to DVS Director Dawn Olson at 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 195, Saint Paul, MN 55101-5190. Disbursement of Funds For Drivate business, a check will be mailed to the Remittance Address that is identified on the grant agreement. If a private business has registered as a vendor in the state's financial system (SWIFT) and selected electronic payment method, then the disbursement of funds will be electronically deposited into your bank account. Citv/County Offices, disbursement of funds will electronically be deposited into the account designated by the city/county for electronic payments. Deputy Registrar offices should contact their Treasurer or Finance Office to verify the deposit of funds into the city/county bank account and request transfer of funds to their office. Liability Release This agreement is made and entered into by and between (Deputy Registrar Appointee Printed Full Name "Deputy Registrar") and The Minnesota Department of Public Safety, the State of Minnesota, or any other past or present parents, agents, assigns, representatives, officers, or employees (collectively "The State").The parties enter into this agreement pursuant to the reimbursement grant authorized by Minnesota Session Laws 2019 1st Special Session, Chapter 3, Article 1, Section 6 & Article 2, Section 36.Therefore in consideration of the foregoing recitals, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. The parties wish to settle all of their differences without further costs to any of them. 2. The parties have agreed to a complete settlement of all of the disputes existing between them. 3. It is expressly understood and agreed as a condition hereof that this Agreement shall not constitute nor be construed to be an admission of any wrongdoing or liability on the part of The State. 4. The creation or payment of reimbursement grants under this section is not: (1) an admission of liability or wrongdoing by the state or its employees for any act or omission arising from the development and deployment of MNLARS; and (2) admissible in a judicial or administrative proceeding to establish liability or a legal duty. 5. In consideration for the payment described above, and in exchange for the promises herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Deputy Registrar, for themselves and all heirs, administrators, representatives, agents, attorneys, successors and assigns, completely releases and forever discharges Department of Public Safety and the State of Minnesota, and all respective present and former officers, agents, representatives, employees, attorneys, insurers, predecessors and successors in interest, and assigns, in their official and individual capacities, from each and every legal claim or demand of any kind that Deputy Registrar ever had or might now have, whether or not any such claim is known to them. This release specifically includes, without limitation, any and all claims currently made or which could have been made. 6. Deputy Registrar fully understands that this is a full, final and complete release of all claims against The State, including, but not limited to, all claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Federal Rehabilitation Act, the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, the Minnesota Human Rights Act, and any other local, state orfederal laws, rules, regulations, ordinances or executive orders relating to illegal discrimination or tort. Deputy Registrar also understands that they are releasing all claims, including but not limited to, all claims based upon all claims for penalties, all claims for attorneys' fees, costs and disbursements incurred by Deputy Registrar or any of their attorneys, all claims for mental anguish and suffering, all claims for damage to reputation, all claims for economic loss, all claims for damages, all claims for compensatory damages, all claims for punitive damages, all claims for liquidated damages, all claims for fraud or misrepresentation, all claims that include the development and deployment of MNLARS. 7. This Agreement does not waive or release any rights or claims of any kind that Deputy Registrar may have which arise after they sign this Agreement, or which arise out of acts occurring after they sign this Agreement. 8. The parties understand that the release of information by The State about this matter is governed by Minn. Stat. § 13.01, et seq. (Minnesota Government Data Practices Act') and Minn. Stat. § 15.17, et seq. ("Official Records Act'). The parties agree that the specific reasons that this dispute is being settled are: (1) to avoid any and all further costs of litigation for all parties; and (2) to avoid any and all further risks of litigation for all parties. The parties agree that the statement of specific reasons in this paragraph for settling this dispute complies with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 13.43, subd. 2(a)(6). 9. This Agreement is to be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any action to enforce this Agreement shall be adjudicated in the state courts of Minnesota. 10. The Deputy Registrar agrees that they have read this Agreement, knows its contents and has signed it as a free and voluntary act having had adequate opportunity to consider its terms and conditions. Date Signed Signature of the Deputy Registrar Appointee Subscribed and sworn before me this day of My Commission expires _ / / Notary Public Signature Notary Stamp or Seal (Optional) Date Signed Signature of the State Agency City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2K. Consideration to approve an electronic funds transfer volicv (WO/SR) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A local government may make certain payments by electronic funds transfer if certain policies, described in MN Statute 471.38, are in place. Electronic funds transfers are defined as any transfer of funds that is initiated by electronic means, including but not limited to check, credit cards, debit cards, and automated clearing house (ACH) or wire transfers, both within and between separate financial institutions. Policy: A. The city's funds, both incoming and outgoing, may be processed by electronic funds transfer where deemed prudent and the most efficient method of payment or receipt. B. The City Council shall annually by Resolution, authorize the Finance Director, or their designee, to make electronic funds transfers. C. The disbursing bank shall keep on file a certified copy of the delegation of authority. D. The initiator of each electronic transfer shall be identified and shall document the request and obtain approval prior to initiating the transfer. E. Written confirmation of each electronic funds transfer shall be available within one business day of each transaction. F. With the exception ofpayroll and bond payments and investments transfers, a list of all electronic fund transfers shall be submitted to the City Council at the next regular City Council Meeting following the transfer, if not approved beforehand. Al. Budget Impact: This action will not have a significant budget impact. A2. Staff Impact: Minimal. Having an established policy will provide current practices with the force of council approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the electronic funds transfer policy. 2. Motion to approve the electronic funds transfer policy with the following modifications: 3. Motion to deny the electronic funds transfer policy. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None. City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2L. Consideration to approve an accounts receivable write-off volicv (WO/SR) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A large majority of customer accounts with unpaid charges can be assessed to property taxes for collections, such as utility bills. However, the unpaid charges for services to non-residents (e.g. community center memberships and fire calls) are more difficult to recover. While a collections service is utilized, some balances are uncollectible from an economic standpoint. Policy: Accounts receivable balances up to $1,000, excluding accumulated interest, deemed to be uncollectible can be written off, by discretion of the Finance Director, under the following circumstances: • The account remains unpaid after one year; • The debtor is discharged through legal action, such as bankruptcy court; • The debtor cannot be located, has died, or is no longer in business; • The debt is disputed and the city has insufficient documentation to pursue collection efforts; • The cost of further collection efforts will exceed the estimated recovery amount; A write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable from the city's accounting records does not constitute forgiveness of the debt or gift of public funds. The Finance Director will provide a list of accounts written off to the Council upon request. Al. Budget Impact: This action will not have a significant budget impact. A2. Staff Impact: Minimal. Having an established policy will provide current practices with the force of council approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the accounts receivable write-off policy. 2. Motion to approve the accounts receivable write-off policy with the following modifications: 3. Motion to deny the accounts receivable write-off policy. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 0 None. City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2M. Consideration to approve amended purchasing policv (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The current purchasing policy has been in place without amendment since October 2015. This policy provides staff with guidance and accountability. Further, it saves the city thousands of dollars every year. Staff believes the changes will continue to provide those aspects. Notable changes to the policy: • Clarifies the Quick Reference Guide and adds a $2,500 to $4,999 tier for director only approval. There are currently 4 directors: public works/city engineer, community development, community center, finance. Designees could be superintendents and department managers. • For items less than $10,000 additional quotes are not required for items purchased through state contract or statutorily -allowed purchasing cooperatives. For items greater than $10,000, three quotes are required regardless of the presence of the item on the state contract or purchasing cooperative. Staff reports for items $10,000 or greater must state whether the item was available on the state contract. • Incorporates the new $175,000 statutory limit requiring sealed bids. A statutory process applies to items over $175,000. Items between $100,000 and $175,000, should follow the same process when feasible, but it is not required. The state law requires council approval for making certain purchases. Minnesota's Uniform Municipal Contracting Law (§471.345) sets the minimum standards. Cities may adopt more rigid standards through policy adoption. The proposed policy addresses some of the concerns with the existing purchasing policy. Al. Budget Impact: This action should not have any budget impact. A2. Staff Impact: Staff must gain knowledge of the new policy. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the amended purchasing policy. 2. Motion to approve the amended purchasing policy with the following modifications: 3. Motion to deny the purchasing the policy. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted 2019-06-24 (Proposed) B. Existing Purchasing Policy (Adopted 2015-10-26) City of Monticello Purchasing Policy (Amended) I. Purpose This purchasing policy was created to: • Clarify and reconcile the requirements of state purchasing law, departmental procedures, and finance department processes • Assist staff in making purchases in an effective, efficient and economical manner • Standardize purchasing and payment methods to expedite the purchasing process • Provide effective controls • Guide staff to support local area businesses when possible and economical This policy sets minimum standards to ensure fiscal responsibility. Departments may set more restrictive procedures to meet their own budgetary accountability. II. Quick Reference Guide Value of Quotations Payment Request Approvals Needed Prior to Purchase Needed Options Purchasing Less than $1,000 Departmental Credit Card 1. Dept. Staff/Manager Discretion Check Request $1,000-$2,499 Two verbal or Credit Card 1. Dept. Director/Designee* written quotes Check Request $2,500-$4,999 Two verbal or Credit Card 1. Dept. Director written quotes Check Request $5,000-$9,999 Three Written Credit Card 1. Dept. Director 2. Finance Director OR Quotes or RFPs Check Request City Administrator 1. Dept. Director $10,000-$99,999 Three Written Check Request 2. Finance Director OR Quotes or RFPs City Administrator 3. City Council 1. Dept. Director Greater than Sealed Bids Check Request 2. Finance Director OR $100,000 City Administrator 3. City Council * Directors must notify the finance department of all designees. Each department (e.g. streets, parks, water and sewage utility, etc.) is limited to having one designee. Designees must be a supervisor of full-time staff. NOTES: • Additional quotations are not required for purchases under $10,000 if the item is purchased through the state contract or from a statutorily -allowed purchasing cooperative or alliance. 11 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted 2015-10-26; Revised 2019-06-24 • All purchases must be approved as part of the annual budget or within an approved CIP. The level of budgetary control is established at the department level. Expenditures for departments that exceed appropriations are not authorized unless additional revenue sources, unspent appropriations, or fund balances are identified and available. • Through resolution, the city council has given the finance director authority to make disbursements for utility accounts, payroll transfers and other services that occur in the normal course of business even though they may exceed $10,000. These contractual accounts for services are approved as part of the budget process and excluded from this policy. • The city administrator or finance director can approve budgeted public works supply purchases exceeding $10,000, but quotation requirements apply (e.g. bulk purchases of chemicals, street maintenance materials, fuel, etc.). Resale inventory purchased during the normal course of business does not require city administrator/finance director/city council approval. • Debt service payments are also pre -approved as listed in the debt service schedule in bond documents. • Contractual services are subject to the limits in the Quick Reference Guide above. Independent contractors are required to provide proof of insurance before providing services. • RFPs are required for contracting services in excess of $25,000 except for contractors included in the consultant pool. III. Ethics/Relations with Vendors The City of Monticello holds its employees to the highest ethical standards. Purchases shall be conducted so they foster public confidence in the integrity of the city's procurement system as well as open and free competition among prospective suppliers. In keeping with this value, employees should avoid the following practices when making purchases on behalf of the city: Circumventing competitive bidding and purchasing policy requirements — Examples include: o Splitting purchases so they can be made through several smaller purchases o Using multi-year agreements that in total exceed the authority granted in Section II o Using the emergency procedure process when no true emergency exists o Using a "sole source" exemption when competition is available Denying one or more vendors the opportunity to bid on a contract — Examples include: o Using unnecessarily restrictive specifications o Pre -qualifying bidders on a discriminatory basis o Removing companies from a bidders list without just cause o Requiring unnecessarily high bonding • Giving favored vendors an unfair advantage — Examples include: o Providing vendors with information regarding their competition's offers in advance of a bid opening o Making information available to favored vendors and not to others o Giving disfavored vendors inaccurate or misleading information • Accepting gifts from vendors o Minnesota Statutes §471.895 prohibits government employees from receiving gifts except where they are included as part of the cost of a product, good, or service 2 1 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted 2015-10-26; Revised 2019-06-24 provided (such as a meal as part of a conference). Gifts are subject to personnel policy limitations. IV. Purchasing Process The City of Monticello has a decentralized purchasing program where individual departments are responsible for making their own purchases. There are a few exceptions, including supplies maintained in the office supply closet, paper, stationery products, and modular furniture and chairs. Administrative assistants will assist staff members who need help with researching or purchasing items when staff is not familiar with the particular products. • Determine the need for commodities or services. • Research the cost of the purchase and determine proper purchasing alternative. • Determine the appropriate account coding and whether sufficient funds are available in that budget line item. • Forward request to department director or designee for approval. If the purchase exceeds $5,000, city administrator or finance director approval is required. If the purchase exceeds $10,000, city council approval is required. • Department director forwards request for payment with invoice to the finance department for approval and input into financial accounting system. • Finance produces claims roster for approval by city council. • Payment is made by the finance department. V. Purchasing Alternatives SEALED BIDS • A formal sealed bid procedure is required for all purchases in excess of $100,000 except for professional services. o For purchases estimated between $100,000 and $175,000, sealed bid procedures shall provide adequate time for solicitation of competitive bids, department outreach to potential vendors, and follow statutory notice requirements when feasible. o If the amount of the contract is estimated to exceed $175,000, sealed bids shall be solicited by public notice in the manner and subject to the requirements of the law governing contracts by the particular municipality or class thereof. • A published notice of bid is required in the official city newspaper at least ten days in advance of bid opening. The published notice must state where the plans and specifications can be obtained by bidders and specifically, where the bid opening will be held. The notice may also be published on the city's official web site; however, this publication is in addition to the official newspaper publication. • All bid openings are to be administered by originating department. • Preparation of all specifications is the responsibility of the originating department. • Required authorization for all plans and specifications is the responsibility of the originating department. • The city council must formally approval the bid contract. QUOTES If a purchase is estimated to exceed $1,000 but not to exceed $99,999, the purchase is to be made by direct negotiation based upon quotations. If a purchase is made in this range, staff members are required to obtain a minimum of two written quotes. If the quotes are not written, the requestor who received the verbal quote must document the quote in writing. All quotes for items 31 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted 2015-10-26; Revised 2019-06-24 over $2,500 must be forwarded to the finance department with the purchasing documents. If multiple quotes cannot be obtained, staff should note the reason(s) why on supporting information submitted to the finance department. All quotes will be recorded using a standardized Verbal/Written Quote Summary Sheet provided by the finance department. STATE, COUNTY, AND OTHER COOPERATIVE PURCHASING CONTRACTS The City of Monticello participates in the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Venture (CPV). This enables participants to buy goods and services at a reduced cost under the terms of contracts already negotiated by the State of Minnesota. Other statutorily -allowed purchasing cooperatives may also qualify. • Each department has access to the releases and listings of products/services that can be purchased on state contract. • If a product/service is available on a state contract, staff should inform the vendor the purchase will be made using that contract. When completing the purchasing paperwork, note the purchase is per state contract and indicate the contract number. • For a contract estimated to exceed $10,000, the purchaser must consider the availability, price, and quality of supplies, materials, or equipment available through the state's cooperative purchasing venture before purchasing through another source. This quote counts as one of the required three. • If a municipality does not utilize the state's cooperative purchasing venture, a municipality may contract for the purchase of supplies, materials, or equipment without regard to the competitive bidding requirements of this section if the purchase is through a national municipal association's purchasing alliance or cooperative created by a joint powers agreement that purchases items from more than one source on the basis of competitive bids or competitive quotations. • Staff reports and the Verbal/Written Quote Summary Sheet must note whether the state contract was checked. EMERGENCIES Emergency situations may arise where the normal purchasing process cannot be followed for the procurement of goods and services. An emergency means an unforeseen combination of circumstances that calls for immediate action to prevent a disaster from developing or occurring. Minnesota Statute §12.29 gives the mayor the authority to declare a local emergency for up to three days, which period may be extended by the city council. During such an emergency, if authorized by city council, the city is not required to use the typically mandated procedures for purchasing and contracts. During that time, the governing body may waive compliance with the prescribed purchasing guidelines, including compliance with Minnesota Statute §471.345, Uniform Municipal Contracting Law. Whenever possible the current purchasing policies and procedures should be followed even in an emergency. However, if an emergency has been declared and requires speedy action essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the standard purchasing policies and procedures can be waived in accordance with Minnesota Statute §12.37. REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) RFPs may be used to solicit proposals for professional services. Typical information to address in RFPs includes: • Background and scope of the project • The project's budget to ensure that the proposals stay within that range • Proposal requirements should include adequate information to allow for proper review and evaluation including: 41 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted 2015-10-26; Revised 2019-06-24 o Description of firm and qualifications, including any specialized experience related to the project. o A list of similar projects that the firm has completed. o Project timetables including: estimate of hours, breakdown by hours by phase, and the city's expectation of a completion date. o Designation of a firm principal who will be in charge of the project. o Resumes for all staff who will work on the project. o Statement that either no subcontractors are allowed or that all subcontractors will be identified and are subject to the city's approval. o Estimate of cost to provide the service, outline of fee schedule and payment schedule o Description of city's selection process. o City's evaluation criteria, which typically may include: ■ Quality and thoroughness of the proposal ■ Similar past experience and/or experience ■ References ■ Cost estimate o The following statement must be included: "The city reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, waive all technicalities and accept any proposal deemed to be in the city's best interest." o Submittal deadline: date, time, project name, and addressee. o Statement: "Proposers are solely responsible for delivery of their proposals to the city before the deadline. Any proposal received after the deadline will not be considered and will be returned." o Information about where questions should be directed. Attach a copy of the proposed project agreement, including the city's insurance certificate. The agreement includes provisions to which the firm must agree, so it is important that they see it in advance. It is suggested that the RFP be submitted to the city attorney for review prior to distribution. LEASE PURCHASES Except for lease purchases requiring city council approval under section II above, all operating and capital lease agreements shall be reviewed by the finance department, city administrator and legal counsel prior to initiating a lease. Staff will conduct a lease versus buy analysis to determine the most cost-effective method. ONLINE PURCHASES The following guidelines are recommended for purchasing products over the internet: • Purchases should be made only from vendors that use secure servers for e-commerce. • Standard purchasing guidelines should be followed. LOCAL VENDORS If the local vendor's quote does not exceed the lowest non -local vendor's quote by more than 5%, the purchase may be made from the local vendor for purchases of less than $10,000. VI. Payment The City of Monticello uses various processes when making payments for goods and services. STANDARD PURCHASE ORDERS 51 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted 2015-10-26; Revised 2019-06-24 Purchase orders are used only when required by the vendor to acknowledge the city's request for goods and services. A copy of the purchase order will be sent to the vendor when requested. • The purchase order number used will be a combination of the department and the sequence of orders issued for the year and month, e.g., the second purchase order for public works in July 2015 would be PW -2015-07-2. • Return an invoice for payment to the finance department when the purchase order is complete. CHECK REQUESTS The finance department policy is for bills to be paid on the claims list. For certain exceptions, requests for checks may be used under the following guidelines: • Requests for checks are for payments that need to be made prior to the claims list. Examples include discounts, avoiding late charges, or purchases requiring payment with an order. BLANKET PURCHASE ORDERS, CHARGE ACCOUNTS, AND HOUSE ACCOUNTS The city uses charge accounts and house accounts for frequently used vendors. This process requires submission of a receipt with an account code and department approval. All new open accounts must be authorized by the requesting department director and the finance department. INVOICES Department heads should submit invoices with an account code and department approval. If provided, packing lists should also be submitted with the invoice. Documentation must be returned to the finance department to be processed on the claims list. STATEMENTS The finance department tracks all statements — reviewing for old invoices or credits. All statements are to be mailed directly to the finance department. CREDIT CARDS The city will issue credit cards to certain individuals to allow for more efficient purchasing and to make purchases at businesses that no longer allow open accounts. The city has a separate Credit Card Policy for these transactions. Credit cards may be used for on-going payments on council approved contracts. ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER Electronic Funds Transfer may be required in some cases to complete a business transaction and is often used for recurring items such as tax withholding, PERA remittances, and utility bills. EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Completed within six months of incurrence, a properly authorized form is required for reimbursement to employees for city -related expenses. Mileage will be paid at the current IRS rate. All requests must contain proper account codes, department approval, and original receipts must be attached where applicable. Expenses will be reimbursed by check or Electronic Funds Transfer on the next claims roster. VII. Disposal of Surplus Property The city generally disposes of surplus equipment through public sale after city council approval. During the year, the city collects items to be sold at public auction and arranges for them to be transported to an auctioneer with a description and number of items to be sold. Staff may also use alternative sale methods, such as eBay, when warranted. 6 1 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted 2015-10-26; Revised 2019-06-24 The auction house will forward a tabulation of the bids received along with payment. The information is reviewed by the department director or assigned personnel and then the payment is forwarded to the finance department. When computer equipment has reached the end of its useful life, hard drives are destroyed and remaining pieces are recycled through a computer recycling vendor or disposed of as waste. VIII. Environmental Concerns Environmentally preferable products are goods and services with a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the environment compared to goods and services that serve the same purpose. The following is an overview of items that should be considered prior to making a purchase. Details relating to the items can be found at the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board website at www.swmcb.ora.. OFFICE PRODUCTS — GENERAL • Erasable boards — alternative to paper flip charts • Solar -powered calculators and other devices — eliminate the need for batteries • Refillable pens, pencils, and tape dispensers — eliminate waste • Reuse file folders and binders — applying new labels extends usefulness • Email — alternative to paper memorandums • Double -sided copies — reduce paper waste • Reusable kitchen dishware — reduce waste • Products in reusable, refillable, or returnable containers — containers may be sent back to the vendor for reuse COPY PAPER AND ENVELOPES • Recycled content — when possible, purchase 100% post -consumer paper • Chlorine -free paper - choose paper labeled as "Processed Chlorine -Free" (PCF) to reduce pollution • White and pastel paper — fluorescent and dark colors are harder to recycle OFFICE MACHINES • Printers — choose printers with duplex units to save paper • Printer toner cartridges — purchase remanufactured toner cartridges from supplies that will reuse spent cartridges • Color copies — produce only when necessary. Draft copies should not be in color. IX. Purchasing Policy Adoption As with all city-wide policies, the city council has the authority to review, adopt and modify the purchasing policy at its discretion. The city's personnel policy overrides the purchasing policy if a conflict between provisions arises. 7 1 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted 2015-10-26; Revised 2019-06-24 City of Monticello Purchasing Policy I. Purpose This purchasing policy was created to: • Clarify and reconcile the requirements of state purchasing law, departmental procedures, and finance department processes • Assist staff in making purchases in an effective, efficient and economical manner • Standardize purchasing and payment methods to expedite the purchasing process • Provide effective controls • Guide staff to support local area businesses when possible and economical The standards in this policy are minimum standards to ensure fiscal responsibility. Departments may set more restrictive procedures to meet their own budgetary accountability. II. Quick Reference Guide Value of Purchase Less than $1,000 $1,000-$2,499 $2,500-$9,999 Quotations Needed Departmental Discretion Two verbal or written quotes Three Written Quotes or RFPs Payment Request Options Credit Card Check Request Credit Card Check Request Purchase Order Credit Card Check Request Purchase Order $10,000-$99,999 Three Written Check Request Quotes or RFPs Purchase Order Greater than Sealed Bids Check Request $100,000 Purchase Order Approvals Needed Prior to Purchasing Department X Finance City Administrator City Council Department X Finance City Administrator City Council Department X Finance X City Administrator X City Council Department X Finance X City Administrator X City Council X Department X Finance X City Administrator X City Council X 11 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted by the City Council 2015-10-26 Notes: • If a cooperative purchasing agreement is in place, quotations are not needed. • All purchases must be approved as part of the annual budget or within an approved CIP. The level of budgetary control is established at the department level. Expenditures for departments that exceed appropriations are not authorized unless additional revenue sources, unspent appropriations, or fund balances are identified and available. • Through resolution, the city council has given the finance director authority to make disbursements for utility accounts, payroll transfers and other services that occur in the normal course of business even though they may exceed $10,000. These contractual accounts for services are approved as part of the budget process and excluded from this policy. • The city administrator or finance director can approve budgeted public works supply purchases exceeding $10,000 but quotation requirements apply (i.e. bulk purchases of chemicals, street maintenance materials, fuel, etc.). Resale inventory purchased during the normal course of business does not require city administrator/finance director/city council approval. • Debt service payments are also pre -approved as listed in the debt service schedule in bond documents. • Contractual services are subject to the limits in the Quick Reference Guide above. Independent contractors are required to provide proof of insurance before providing services. • RFPs are required for contracting services in excess of $25,000 except for contractors included in the consultant pool. III. Ethics/Relations with Vendors The City of Monticello holds its employees to the highest ethical standards. Purchases shall be conducted so they foster public confidence in the integrity of the city's procurement system, and open and free competition among prospective suppliers. In keeping with this value, employees should avoid the following practices when making purchases on behalf of the city: • Circumventing competitive bidding and purchasing policy requirements — Examples include: o Splitting purchases so that they can be made through several smaller purchases o Using multi-year agreements that in total exceed the authority granted in Section II o Using the emergency procedure process when no true emergency exists o Using a "sole source" exemption when competition is available • Denying one or more vendors the opportunity to bid on a contract — Examples include: o Using unnecessarily restrictive specifications o Pre -qualifying bidders on a discriminatory basis o Removing companies from a bidders list without just cause o Requiring unnecessarily high bonding • Giving favored vendors an unfair advantage — Examples include: o Providing vendors with information regarding their competition's offers in advance of a bid opening o Making information available to favored vendors and not to others o Giving un -favored vendors inaccurate or misleading information • Accepting gifts from vendors o Minnesota Statutes §471.895 prohibits government employees from receiving gifts except where they are included as part of the cost of a product, good, or service provided (such as a meal as part of a conference). Gifts are subject to personnel policy limitations. 21 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted by the City Council 2015-10-26 IV. Purchasing Process The City of Monticello has a decentralized purchasing program where individual departments are responsible for making their own purchases. There are a few exceptions including supplies maintained in the office supply closet, paper, and stationery products, and modular furniture and chairs. Administrative assistants will assist staff members who need help with research or purchase of items in cases where staff is not familiar with particular products. • Determine the need for commodities or services. • Research the cost of the purchase and determine proper purchasing alternative. • Determine the appropriate account coding and whether sufficient funds are available in that budget line item. • Forward request to department director or designee for approval. If the purchase exceeds $2,500, city administrator or finance director approval is required. If the purchase exceeds $10,000, city council approval is required. • Department director forwards request for payment with invoice to the finance department for approval and input into financial accounting system. • Finance produces claims roster for approval by city council. • Payment is made by the finance department. V. Purchasing Alternatives SEALED BIDS • A formal sealed bid procedure is required for all purchases in excess of $100,000 except for professional services. • A published notice of bid is required in the official city newspaper at least seven days in advance of bid opening. The published notice must state where the plans and specifications can be obtained by bidders and specifically, where the bid opening will be held. The notice may also be published on the city's official web site; however, this publication is in addition to the official newspaper publication. • All bid openings are to be administered by originating department. • Preparation of all specifications is the responsibility of the originating department. • Required authorization for all plans and specifications is the responsibility of the originating department. • The city council must formally approval the bid contract. STATE, COUNTY, AND OTHER COOPERATIVE PURCHASING CONTRACTS The City of Monticello participates in the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Venture (CPV). This enables participants to buy goods and services at a reduced cost under the terms of contracts already negotiated by the State of Minnesota. • The finance department has access to the releases and listings of products/services that can be purchases on state contract. • If it is determined that a product/service is on a state contract, vendors should be told that the purchase will be made using that contract. When completing the purchasing paperwork, note that the purchase is per state contract and indicate the contract number. 31 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted by the City Council 2015-10-26 QUOTES If a purchase is estimated to exceed $1,000 but not to exceed $99,999, the purchase is to be made by direct negotiation based upon quotations. If a purchase is made in this range, staff members are required to obtain at least more than one quote. These quotes should be in writing. If the quotes are not written, the requestor who received the verbal quote must document the quote in writing. All quotes for items over $2,500 must be forwarded to the finance department with the purchasing documents. If two or three quotes are not obtainable, staff should note the reason(s) why on supporting information submitted to the finance department. Verbal quotes will be recorded using a standardized form provided by the finance department. EMERGENCY Emergency situations may arise where the normal purchasing process cannot be followed for the procurement of goods and services. An emergency means an unforeseen combination of circumstances that calls for immediate action to prevent a disaster from developing or occurring. Minnesota Statute §12.29 gives the mayor the authority to declare a local emergency for up to three days, which period may be extended by the city council. During such an emergency, if authorized by city council, the city is not required to use the typically mandated procedures for purchasing and contracts. During that time, the governing body may waive compliance with the prescribed purchasing guidelines, including compliance with Minnesota Statute §471.345, Uniform Municipal Contracting Law. Whenever possible the current purchasing policies and procedures should be followed even when an emergency is declared, but as described above if the emergency requires speedy action essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the community and if there has been an emergency declaration, the standard purchasing policies and procedures can be waived in accordance with Minnesota Statute §12.37. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) RFPs may be used to solicit proposals for professional services. Typical information to address in RFPs includes: Background and scope of the project The project's budget to ensure that the proposals stay within that range Proposal requirements should include adequate information to allow for proper review and evaluation including: o Description of firm and qualifications, including any specialized experience related to the project o A list of similar projects that the firm has completed o Project timetables including: estimate of hours, breakdown by hours by phase, and the city's expectation of a completion date o Designation of a firm principal who will be in charge of the project o Resumes for all staff who will work on the project o Statement that either no subcontractors are allowed or that all subcontractors will be identified and are subject to the city's approval o Estimate of cost to provide the service, outline of fee schedule and payment schedule o Description of city's selection process o City's evaluation criteria, which typically may include: ■ Quality and thoroughness of the proposal ■ Similar past experience and/or experience ■ References ■ Cost estimate 41 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted by the City Council 2015-10-26 o The following statement must be included: "The city reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, waive all technicalities and accept any proposal deemed to be in the city's best interest." o Submittal deadline: date, time, project name, and addressee o Statement: "Proposers are solely responsible for delivery of their proposals to the city before the deadline. Any proposal received after the deadline will not be considered and will be returned." o Information about where questions should be directed Attach a copy of the agreement proposed to be used for the project, including the city's insurance certificate. The agreement includes provisions to which the firm must agree, so it is important that they see the agreement up front. It is suggested that the RFP be submitted to the city attorney for review prior to distribution. LEASE PURCHASES Except for lease purchases requiring city council approval under section 11 above, all operating and capital lease agreements shall first be reviewed by the finance department, city administrator and legal counsel prior to initiating a lease. Staff will conduct a lease versus buy analysis to determine the most cost-effective method. ON-LINE PURCHASES The following guidelines are recommended for purchasing products over the internet: Purchases should be made only from vendors that use secure servers for e-commerce. Standard purchasing guidelines should be followed. LOCAL VENDORS If the local vendor's quote does not exceed the lowest non -local vendor's quote by more than 5%, the purchase may be made from the local vendor for purchases of less than $10,000. VL Payment The City of Monticello uses various processes in making payments for goods and services. STANDARD PURCHASE ORDERS Purchase orders are used when required by the vendor to acknowledge the city's request for goods and services. A copy of the purchase order will be sent to the vendor when requested. • The purchase order number used will be a combination of the department and the sequence of orders issued for the year and month, e.g., the second purchase order for public works in July 2015 would be PW -2015-07-2. • Return an invoice for payment to the finance department when the purchase order is complete. CHECK REQUESTS The finance department policy is for bills to be paid on the claims list. For certain exceptions, requests for checks may be used under the following guidelines: • Requests for checks are for payments that need to be made prior to the claims list. Examples include discounts, avoiding late charges, or purchases requiring payment with an order. 51 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted by the City Council 2015-10-26 BLANKET PURCHASE ORDERS, CHARGE ACCOUNTS, AND HOUSE ACCOUNTS The city uses charge accounts and house accounts for frequently used vendors. This process requires submission of a receipt with an account code and department approval. All new open accounts must be authorized by the requesting department director and the finance department. INVOICES Department heads should submit invoices with an account code and department approval. If provided, packing lists should also be submitted with the invoice. Documentation must be returned to the finance department to be processed on the claims list. STATEMENTS The finance department tracks all statements — reviewing for old invoices or credits. All statements are to be mailed directly to the finance department. CREDIT CARDS The city will issue credit cards to certain individuals to allow for more efficient purchasing and to make purchases at businesses that no longer allow open accounts. The city has a separate Credit Card Policy for these transactions. Credit cards may be used for on-going payments on council approved contracts. ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER Electronic Funds Transfer may be required in some cases to complete a business transaction and is often used for recurring items such as tax withholding, PERA remittances, and utility bills. EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Completed within six months of incurrence, a properly authorized form is required for reimbursement to employees for city -related expenses. Mileage will be paid at the current IRS rate. All requests must contain proper account codes, department approval, and original receipts must be attached where applicable. Expenses will be reimbursed by check on the next claims roster. VII. Disposal of Surplus Property The city generally disposes of surplus equipment through public sale after city council approval. Throughout the year the city collects items to be sold at public auction and sends them to an auctioneer with a description and number of items to be sold, and makes arrangements for those items to be transported. Staff may also use alternative sale methods, such as eBay when warranted. The auction house will forward a tabulation of the bids received along with payment. The information is reviewed by the department director or assigned personnel and then the payment is forwarded to the finance department. When computer equipment has reached the end of its useful life, hard drives are destroyed, and remaining pieces are recycled through a computer recycling vendor or disposed of as waste. VIII. Environmental Concerns Environmentally preferable products are goods and services that have a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the environment when compared with other goods and services that serve the same purpose. The following is an overview of items that should be considered prior to making a purchase. Details relating to the items can be found at the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board website at www.swmcb.orq_. 61 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted by the City Council 2015-10-26 OFFICE PRODUCTS — GENERAL • Erasable boards — alternative to paper flip charts • Solar powered calculators and other devices — eliminate the need for batteries • Refillable pens, pencils, and tape dispensers — eliminate waste • Reuse file folders and binders — applying new labels extends usefulness • E-mail — alternative to paper memorandums • Double -sided copies — reduce paper waste • Reusable kitchen dishware — reduce waste • Purchase products in reusable, refillable, or returnable containers — containers may be sent back to the vendor for reuse COPY PAPER AND ENVELOPES Recycled content —when possible, purchase 100% post -consumer paper Chlorine -free paper — buying chlorine -free paper reduces pollution - choose paper labeled as "Processed Chlorine -Free" (PCF) White and pastel paper — fluorescent and dark colors are harder to recycle OFFICE MACHNIES • Printers — choose printers with duplex units to save paper • Printer toner cartridges — purchase remanufactured toner cartridges from supplies that will reuse spent cartridges • Color copies — produce only when necessary. Draft copies should not be in color. IX. Purchasing Policy Adoption As with all city-wide policies, the city council has the authority to review, adopt and modify the purchasing policy at its discretion. The city's personnel policy overrides the purchasing policy if a conflict between provisions arises. 71 Page City of Monticello Purchasing Policy Adopted by the City Council 2015-10-26 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2N. Consideration of approving the renewal of the agreement with Allina Health for training and certification for Monticello Fire Department first responders and emergencv medical technicians (DK) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Monticello Fire Department is requesting Council to renew the agreement to utilize the services of Allina Health for training and certification of first responders and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) on the department. The proposed agreement will provide medical direction oversight in addition to conducting training courses for the department for 2019 and 2020. Allina will manage the certification process and the record-keeping related to the medical education they would provide. The Monticello Fire Department has regular training nights and allocates this time for various training needs including medical training. Allina Health provides training and medical direction to many other departments in Wright County, including Albertville, Buffalo, Clearwater, and St. Michael. The Monticello Fire Department already communicates regularly with these departments. With the renewal of the agreement with Allina Health, the department will be able to have firefighters cross -train at other departments when they cannot make it to a training session in Monticello. This is an advantage in keeping medical certifications up to date. Due to being under the medical direction of Allina there are no alternate vendors for this contract. Allina was paid $4,928 ($1,232/qtr) in 2018 for these services. Al. Budget Impact: This training was included in the 2019 and will be in the 2020 budget as well. A2. Staff Workload Impact: This will reduce the time that Monticello firefighters have put into providing courses and personnel for conducting training. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the proposed two-year agreement with Allina Health for training and certification for Monticello Fire Department first responders and emergency medical technicians. 2. Motion to deny approving an agreement with Allina Health at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Fire Chief and city staff recommend Alternative #1, approving an agreement with Allina Health for providing training services as noted. With the Allina Health agreement, they will provide personnel committed to training on specific dates, and will not be called away for an emergency. If Monticello firefighters miss a required training, they could attend class at another participating department within Wright County. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Copy of Allina Health proposed agreement SERVICES AGREEMENT DRAFT COPY 7 PAGES: This Services Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into January 1 st 2019 ("Effective Date") by and between Allina Health System d/b/a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services ("AHEMS"), a Minnesota nonprofit corporation having principal office at 167 Grand Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102, and the Monticello Fire Department located at 505 Walnut Street, Monticello MN, 55362 WHEREAS, First Responder is an entity engaged in providing emergency response, care, and treatment services to patients in its geographic service area; and WHEREAS, AHEMS is a licensed ambulance service provider and is also licensed to provide emergency medical services ("EMS") education; and WHEREAS, AHEMS has the personnel and resources to meet the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 144E.265, and to provide medical direction and support services to First Responder; and WHEREAS, First Responder desires to engage AHEMS to provide Services (as defined below) in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises specified below, the parties agree as follows. 1. Services. Beginning on the Effective Date, AHEMS will assign individuals to provide, and will provide, the Services set forth in Exhibit A (the "Services"), attached hereto and incorporated herein. 2. Oualifications. AHEMS will ensure that each individual it assigns to provide the Services is qualified, in terms of education and training to provide the Services, in accordance with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations, and as may be further specified in Exhibit A and maintains in good standing and without limitations, exceptions or conditions, at all times while performing the Services, any license, registration, or certification necessary to provide the Services. 3. Fees and Pavment. In exchange for the Services, First Responder will make payment of the amount due under this Agreement to AHEMS in a timely manner in response to receipt of an invoice supported by adequate documentation. First Responder will pay AHEMS for the Services as set forth in Exhibit B. If any of the fees owed are paid on a prospective annual basis, if AHEMS terminates this Agreement prior to the expiration of a full year, AHEMS will refund to First Responder a prorated portion of such annual fee(s) paid for Services not performed as of the date of termination. For all other fees owed under this Agreement, in the event of early termination First Responder will make payment only for the Services performed prior to the effective date of termination. 4. Use of Space: Intentionally Omitted 5. Term and Termination. The initial term of this Agreement will commence on the Effective Date and continue for 2 years, unless earlier terminated ("Initial Term"). Upon expiration of the Initial Term or any subsequent Renewal Term (defined below) of this Agreement, unless terminated in accordance with this paragraph, this Agreement will automatically renew for successive periods of 2 Page 1 Services Ageement years (each, a "Renewal Term") unless either party notifies the other party at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the then -current term that such party does not wish the Agreement to be renewed (the Initial Term and all Renewal Terms, collectively, the "Term"). This Agreement may be terminated by either party for any reason upon 30 days' prior written notice or by mutual agreement of the parties. 6. Indemnification. AHEMS will defend, hold harmless, and indemnify First Responder, its officers, directors, employees, and agents from any claims, liabilities, or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) arising from or relating to AHEMS's acts or omissions in connection with this Agreement. First Responder will defend, hold harmless, and indemnify AHEMS, its officers, directors, employees, and agents from any claims, liabilities, or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) arising from or relating to First Responder's acts or omissions in connection with this Agreement. The provisions of this paragraph will survive termination of this Agreement. 7. Insurance. AHEMS agrees to maintain such policies of insurance, self-insurance, or combinations thereof in amounts not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $3,000,000.00 aggregate. First Responder agrees to provide and maintain insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $3,000,000.00 annual aggregate unless such entity is governmental entity. If First Responder is a governmental entity, First Responder agrees to provide and maintain liability insurance as set out in applicable state law. 8. Excluded Provider. Each party hereby certifies that neither it nor its employees, directors, officers, agents, or subcontractors are presently excluded, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in Medicare, Medicaid, or any other federal health care program ("Federal Health Care Programs") or in federal procurement or non -procurement programs, and have not been convicted of a criminal offense within the scope of 42 U.S.C. § 1320a -7(a). Each party will immediately give written notice to the other of any debarment, exclusion, or other event that makes such party, or an employee, director, officer, agent, or subcontractor of such party, ineligible to participate in Federal Health Care Programs or in federal procurement or non -procurement programs. 9. Illegality. If, as determined by agreement of the parties' counsel, or, if the parties' counsel cannot agree, by a nationally recognized law firm with expertise in health care regulation jointly selected by the parties, any provision of this Agreement violates any applicable federal or state statute, rule, regulation, or administrative or judicial decision (collectively, the "Law"), then either party may give notice to the other to amend this Agreement solely to comply with the Law and the parties will negotiate in good faith with respect thereto. If they cannot agree on the terms and conditions of any such amendment within 15 days after such notice is given, then either party may terminate this Agreement immediately upon notice to the other without further liability, but, if the implementation of the Law is stayed, the right to amend or terminate the Agreement will also be stayed for the same period of time. When a question arises as to whether this Agreement complies with the Law, and before a determination is made, either party may suspend payments under the Agreement pending amendment or termination. 10. Independent Contractors. AHEMS including its employees, or agents, is an independent contractor of First Responder and nothing in this Agreement will be construed to create an employer/employee or joint venture relationship between First Responder and AHEMS or its employees, or agents. Page 2 Services Ageement 11. Notices. Any notice pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing and must be personally delivered, sent by email, or sent by certified mail, addressed to the parties at the addresses below or at such other address as they specify in written notice. Notices are effective upon personal delivery or when sent by e-mail or certified mail. If to Company: Mike Mossey 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Fire. chief@ci.monticello.mn.us If to AHEMS: Brian LaCroix 167 Grand Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 Brian.Lacroix@allina.com 12. Miscellaneous. Neither party may assign, subcontract, or transfer its rights hereunder without the other party's prior written consent. Nothing in this Agreement will create any obligations by AHEMS or First Responder to any person or entity not a party to this Agreement, including any individuals employed by or under contract with AHEMS or First Responder. This Agreement, together with its exhibits and attachments, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter, and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, promises, and representations made by either party to the other concerning the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only upon mutual written agreement of the parties. If a court of competent jurisdiction holds any provision of this Agreement invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nonetheless be enforceable. If such court determines that any provision of this Agreement is held to be overbroad as written, such provision will be deemed amended to narrow its application to the extent necessary to make the provision enforceable according to applicable law and enforced as amended. The failure of either party to insist on the performance of any provision of this Agreement and to exercise any rights hereunder will not be construed as a waiver of future performance of any such provision or the future exercise of such right. 13. Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without reference to conflict of laws principles. [Rest of page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows] Page 3 Services Ageement IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as follows: ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM D/B/A ALLINA HEALTH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES Title Dated Jeff O'Neil Monticello City Administrator By Title: Dated By Title: Dated Page 4 Services Ageement EXHIBIT A Services AHEMS will designate a contact person whom First Responder may contact to arrange for the provision of Services. First Responder will make all efforts to provide reasonable advance notice of its need for any of the Services and AHEMS will make all commercially reasonable efforts to procure resources necessary to deliver the Services, provided, however, that with the exception of Medical Direction services (if applicable) AHEMS will have no obligation to provide the Services if AHEMS is unable to procure necessary resources or personnel to furnish the Services. Services provided pursuant to this Agreement include the following: 1. Medical Direction. a) AHEMS agrees to provide medical director services to First Responder to support First Responder's emergency medical program. Medical Director services will include: (i) Use of AHEMS protocols; (ii) Medical direction oversight by the AHEMS Medical Director or such other qualified physician as AHEMS may contract with from time -to -time for such services; (iii) Other functions of a medical director as set forth in Minn. Stat. § 144E.265 b) As a prerequisite of condition to AHEMS providing the Medical Director services contemplated herein, the First Responder agrees that it will at all times during the Term of this Agreement: (i) Operate under AHEMS services protocols; (ii) Use only certified EMT's, EMR's and/or personnel who are credentialed by Allina Health EMS to provide direct medical care. Document the care and services of the certified EMTs and/or first responders utilizing the standard format provided by AHEMS; and (iii) Consult with the AHEMS coordinator and/or Medical Director on major equipment purchases. C) Monticello FD will compensate AHEMS for Medical Direction Services in the amount of $100.00/year (included in total package fee). 2. Education and Training. a) AHEMS will provide the following training: 5, two hour training sessions per year. The times scheduled will be mutually agreed upon and the sessions will be designed around approximately 25-30 students. Once every two years Allina Health EMS will provide a CPR refresher course consistent with the AHA standards. This class will be another 2 hour training session but will provide three instructors to maintain 10:1 Student to Instructor best practice ratio. b) AHEMS will provide training supplies, including disposables needed for skill practice sessions. AHA Healthcare provider CPR cards will be provided at current AHA card rates. Monticello FD will compensate Allina Health EMS $100.00 for disposable medical supplies. (included in total package fee). Page 5 Services Ageement 3. On -Scene Restocking: To the extent permitted by applicable law, AHEMS will provide First Responder with the supplies and drugs necessary to replace those used by First Responder's personnel in the treatment and care of a patient on scene before such patient is transported or treated by AHEMS emergency medical professionals. If on -scene replacement is not possible, First Responder will provide AHEMS with the run number associated with the call. The provision of any medications to any patient by AHEMS or First Responder will be consistent with applicable drug protocols established by the Medical Director. First Responder will not bill any patient or third party payer for any supplies or drugs provided pursuant to this paragraph. 4. Additional Services. As mutually agreed upon by the parties, AHEMS may make the following additional services available to Monticello FD and Monticello FD will compensate AHEMS for such services as set forth below: a) Additional education sessions outside of the education and training described in Section 2 of this Exhibit A ("Additional Services"). The Additional Services may include: remediation, additional training, or consultation for large scale trainings; any additional trainings; if class sizes grow consistently beyond the span of control and observation is untenable for 2 instructors, additional instructors; psychomotor capabilities confirmation; and remediation if Allina acts as an agent for the Monticello Fire Department Training/Safety Officer. Any such Additional Services will be billed at $65.00 per instructor hour. Any AHA CPR cards requested by the Monticello Fire Department will be billed at the current AHA card rate. If requested by the Monticello Fire Department Heartsaver CPR cards will be billed at the current Heartsaver CPR rate. Page 6 Services Ageement EXHIBIT B FEES During the Initial Term the Monticello Fire Department will compensate AHEMS $3509.00/year period for the Services (and training supplies) identified in Exhibit A (other than the Additional Services, which will be billed at the rate set forth in Section 4 of Exhibit A), payable pursuant to quarterly invoices. Thereafter, the fees shall increase by 5%/year of the then -current fees for each subsequent Renewal Term. Page 7 Services Ageement City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 20. Consideration of approving the purchase of a $47,319 back-up generator for the new fire station from Ziegler Power Svstems, rescinding the original purchase of $37,874, and adding $9,445 for a larger switch. (DK, MM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council approved the purchase of an automatic transfer switch and back up generator on 2/11/19. During the review process by the electrician it was discovered there was an error in the specs for the automatic transfer switch. This has resulted in needing to purchase a larger switch. The difference is an additional $9,445. We are asking city council to amend the contract with Ziegler to reflect a new total of $47,319. This item is not on the state contract. However, the city saves $16,713 by using cooperative pricing through Sourcewell, formerly known as the National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA). As a service cooperative, Sourcewell is a local government unit, public corporation and public agency pursuant to the Minnesota Constitution and enabling law Minn. Stat. § 123A.21. Sourcewell follows the competitive contracting law process to solicit, evaluate and award cooperative purchasing contracts for goods and services. Sourcewell cooperative purchasing contracts are made available through the joint exercise of powers law Minn. Stat. §471.59 to member agencies. Al. Budget Impact: This item is still well below the estimated $100,000 included in 2019 new fire station construction budget. A2. Staff Workload Impact: This generator will allow the new station to continue to function at full capacity during an emergency or disaster. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the purchase of a $47,319 back-up generator for the new fire station from Ziegler Power Systems, rescinding the original purchase of $37,874, and adding $9,445 for a larger switch. 2. Motion to deny the purchase of a $47,319 back-up generator for the new fire station from Ziegler Power Systems, rescinding the original purchase of $37,874, and adding $9,445 for a larger switch. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 0 Updated contract from Ziegler for the generator and ATS. Date: June 11, 2019 To: City of Monticello Pro osal b ZIEGLER Power Systems 8050 State Highway 101 Shakopee, MN 55379 952-233-4349 Proposal No. EPG30547644 Re: Standby Generator Sourcewell Revl Change order Attn: Dan Klein "Monticello Fire Dept.- SOURCEWELL 120617 -CAT" WE PROPOSE TO FURNISHINACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS, TERMSAND CONDITIONS QUANTITY: One (1) new CATERPILLAR emergency standby generator set Skid base unit to be placed inside building MODEL: DG125-2 —Natural Gas RATING: 125KW Stand-by VOLTAGE: 208/120Volts, 3 phase, 60 HZ, 1800 RPM BREAKERS: Two (2) mainline circuit breaker Thermal magnetic trip 400 amp, 3 pole 100% rated, Shunt trip SWITCHGEAR One (1) open transition, automatic transfer switch 400 amp, 4 pole, 208 volt, Nema 1 WARRANTY: Four (4) year 2,000 hour INSTALLATION: By Others - Rigging, mechanical, electrical CATERPILLAR LIST PRICE: $ 47,753.00 SOURCEWELL DISCOUNT 35%: ($ 16,713.55) GENERATOR PRICE: $ 31,039.45 ATS PRICE: $ 11,845.00 FACTORY FREIGHT: $ 2,000.00 DEALER PREP: $ 684.60 STARTUP: $1,750.00 SOURCEWELL BID PRICE: $ 479319.05* *Price does not include state or local sales and/or use tax *Please refer to the attached Bill of Material. Standard Ziegler Power Svstems Confidentiality Clause The recipient shall not disclose or otherwise make available to any other person or entity, or use other than in connection with performance of the Services which are the subject of this proposal, the contents of this proposal or any other documents, data or information previously delivered or to be delivered to the other party in connection herewith, except as such disclosure may be required by governmental or regulator authorities. Information may be divulged to other parties if prior written approval from Ziegler Power systems has been obtained. ESTIMATED DELIVERY: 14-15 weeks after submittal approval TERMS: Net 20 days - 90% billed at delivery, 10% billed at start-up ACCEPTED: Utz Respectfully submitted, ZIEGLER INC. F.O.B. Jobsite, on truck Kyl.& Fro-vw Kyle From, Sales Engineer Subject to approval by APPROVED: ZIEGLER INC. Its By BILL OF MATERIAL EPG30547644 -1- ONE (1) NATURAL GAS EMERGENCY STANDBY GENERATOR SET, RATED AT 125KW STANDBY, 3 PHASE, 60 HZ, 208/120 VOLT, 1800 RPM. ENGINE SPECIFICATIONS Meets EPA Regulations 8.8 Liter, V8 Engine Electronic governor Oil filter, spin -on type Radiator cooling system, blower fan Water pump 12V DC starting system Jacket water heater, 120 volt, 1500 watt Alternator, 30 ampere, 12 VDC Fuel system: Natural Gas NFPA110 compliant / UL2200 listed STANDARD ENGINE SAFETY FEATURES Shutdowns with individual warning lamps Fail to start / overcrank High coolant temperature Low lube oil pressure Over -speed Over -voltage GENERATOR SPECIFICATIONS Class H insulation, rotor and stator, single bearing design Flexible coupling 105C Temperature rise Solid-state regulator, +/-1 % regulation Two (2) UL mainline circuit breaker, Thermal Magnetic Trip, 400 amp, 3 pole, 100% rated, Shunt trip CONTOLLER EMCP 4.2 Series control panel features: Run/off/auto switch Remote signals/contacts from panel Terminals for remote emergency stop Common fault alarm signal Start/Stop volt free control Panel lights Audible alarm Three (3) attempt start timer (adjustable) Lamp test pushbutton AC instrumentation for volts, amps, frequency Seven (7) position voltmeter phase selector switch Four (4) position ammeter phase selector switch Red lockdown stop pushbutton BILL OF MATERIAL EPG30547644 -2- AUTOMATIC 2- AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH One (1) open transition, automatic transfer switch 400 amp, 4 pole, 208 volt, nema 1 ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT Skid base mounted — to be installed in building Battery charger, 10 ampere, static, generator mounted Heavy duty battery, with battery rack and cables Gas flex connection One (1) remote E stop — Shipped Loose PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES Submittal drawings Dimensional drawings Electrical schematics Product specifications Prototype testing Production testing Technical assistance - coordinated through Ziegler project manager Jobsite startup Operation and maintenance manual Engine, generator Warranty, four (4) year, 2000 hours COMMENTS AND CLARIFICATIONS Mechanical & electrical installation not included Exhaust and intake louver equipment not included Crane services for setting unit on pad not included Delivery by Ziegler Power Systems Concrete pad not included NOTES Ziegler limits the scope of supply for this quotation to the equipment and services listed. Equipment not listed is assumed to be provided by others. Orders are subject to re -stocking charges if cancelled after release for production. State and local permits for fire, air, fuel tanks or building permits are not included and provided by others. Start-up labor is to be performed during normal business hours, Monday through Friday 7:30 am to 4:00 pm. Training is to be performed at the end of start-up. Additional trips or delays required or requested due to contractor delay and/or issues with equipment not provided from Ziegler Power Systems will be billed at published field service rates. BILL OF MATERIAL EPG30547644 -3- Terms: 3- Terms: • Extension of contract beyond term must be at the mutual agreement of the parties. • Ziegler Inc. shall not be liable for consequential damages or damages beyond our control. • This quotation is subject to availability at time of order • Customer is responsible for adequate site conditions and security. • Customer is responsible for scheduled maintenance and fuel costs. • Customer must provide adequate insurance to cover equipment damage or loss. • Price(s) do not include state or local sales and/or use taxes. • Quotation is valid for 60 days. PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT AND WARRANTY The prices quoted are current and are subject to change to those in effect at the time of shipment. Caterpillar products are sold subject to the terms of the applicable Caterpillar warranty. Copies of the warranties applicable to this purchase are attached hereto, and the purchaser by signing this order acknowledges receipt of the Caterpillar warranties on Forms. The Purchaser agrees to pay any and all taxes, assessments, licenses, and government charges of every kind and nature whatsoever upon said equipment which may be imposed or assessed against or resulting to the Seller on account of the possession or use of said equipment by Purchaser. All provisions hereof are contingent upon government restrictions, strikes, accidents, delays of carrier and other delays unavoidable and beyond Seller's control. It is intended and understood that title and ownership of said equipment is and shall remain vested in the Seller, notwithstanding delivery or possession, until the entire price is paid in full. City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2P. Consideration of approving contract with Xcel Energv to bring power to the transformer for the new fire station in the amount of $11,353 (DK) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to accept the contract with Xcel Energy to bring power from Chelsea Road to the transformer behind the new fire station. This purchase was not in the budget for the new station approved by council. We were notified by Xcel Energy on June 12 that there would be a charge to bring power from Chelsea Road to the transformer at the station. The station bid included bringing power into the station but not to the transformer. According to Kue Contractors this is a normal process in building construction. They have no way to bid this cost with the building. Xcel charges their own pricing and completes their own work. Unfortunately, this was never discussed in the planning prior to June 6. There is no state bid for this item and no other can do this work for Xcel Energy. Al. Budget Impact: This item was not included in 2019 new fire station construction budget, this will be an addition to the budget. A2. Staff Workload Impact: This is required in order to et electrical power at the new station. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the contract for $11,353. 2. Motion to deny the contract for $11,353. [f Vj IFR W a 71[KIXR-0-111e171111130 City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 0 Contract with Xcel Energy Account No. XX -0012699596-X Job No. 11078207 Job Address 103 CHELSEA RD MONTICELLO, MN 55362 Dear Monticello, Xcel Energy° Northern States Power Company - Minnesota 118 DUNDAS ROAD MONTICELLO, MN 55362 Thank you for choosing Xcel Energy to be your energy provider. We appreciate your business, and our goal is to deliver you reliable service at an affordable price. This letter contains important information about your requested service. Please read all details below as well as any accompanying information and respond accordingly to ensure your project is completed accurately and timely. This letter relates to your request for: Your portion of the cost of this project is $11,352.95. A hard copy invoice will be sent to you via U.S. Mail Postal Service in the coming days. Please see the attached payment options document for more instructions. Upon receipt of payment and other required documentation as noted below, your project will be scheduled and you will be notified of the scheduled date. If paying by check, please note the account number identified at the top of this letter on your check to ensure accurate and timely payment processing. Below is a list of additional documentation that you will need to review, sign, and return to the Xcel Energy Designer by email or U.S. Postal Service to their address listed at the bottom of the letter. Please retain a copy of all documentation for your records. ➢ Documents to be returned to Xcel Energy: ➢ Additional enclosures: ❑ Payment Options If you have any questions about the enclosures or about your specific job, please contact Michael Pratt at 763- 271-8999 and reference your account number and/orjob number above. We look forward to being your energy provider. Sincerely, Michael Pratt DESIGNER 118 DUNDAS ROAD MONTICELLO, MN 55362 Xcel Energy Michael. C. Pratt@xcelenergy.com 7 XcelEnergy STATEMENT OF WORK REQUESTED DATE: WORK REQUESTED BY: WORK LOCATION: ADDRESS: June 19, 2019 MONTICELLO 103 CHELSEA RD, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 505 WALNUT ST MONTICELLO, MN 55362-8821 CONSISTING OF: Bore road with 6" conduit, plow 3ph 1/0 primary to transformer and out, pull wire from transformer to Ct cabinet. The facilities installed or removed by Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation ("Xcel Energy" or the "Company') shall be the property of the Company and any payment by customer shall not entitle customer to any ownership interest or right therein. Customer's and Company's rights and obligations with respect to the facilities and services provided through the facilities are subject to additional terms and conditions as provided in the General Rules and Regulations and/or in the Rate Schedules of Xcel Energy's Electric Rate Book for customer's specific service, as they now exist or may hereafter be changed, on file with the state regulatory commission in the state where service is provided. The undersigned hereby requests and authorizes Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation ("Xcel Energy') to do the work described above, and in consideration thereof, agrees to pay ($ 11352.95 in accordance with the following terms: Receipt of the above amount hereby acknowledged on behalf of the Company by Michael Pratt Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation ("Xcel Energy') Joe Klein, Design Manager Print Full Name and Title Signature FOR XCEL ENERGY USE Xcel Energy Representative Construction$ 11352.95 Form 17-7012 Customer Print Full Name and Title (if applicable) Signature Michael Pratt Removal $ Xcel Energy Work Order # 11078207 Total $ 11352.95 2Q. 11 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 Consideration to approve a simple subdivision of an existing parcel and concurrent administrative lot combination in an adjustment to an existing lot line. Applicant: SPO LLC (NAC) Property: Planning Case Number: Legal: Outlot B, River Mill 2019-016 REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Subdivision of a parcel (and a concurrent lot combination of the parcel to an adjoining lot) adjusting the location of a lot line between two existing parcels. Deadline for Decision: July 14th, 2019 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: B-2 Limited Business and B-3, Highway Business District The purpose of the "B-2" limited business district is to provide for low intensity retail or service outlets which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are furnished. The uses allowed in this district are to provide goods and services on a limited community market scale and located in areas which are well served by collector or arterial street facilities at the edge of residential districts, The purpose of the `B-3" (Highway Business) district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River District Current Site Use: Vacant/Bar-Restaurant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Two -Family Residential East: Commercial South: East Broadway - I-94 West: Commercial Project Description: The applicant's property consists of a parcel of approximately one acre in size, which is platted as Outlot A and Outlot B of River Mill. The southernmost of these two outlots (Outlot A) has no frontage on any City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 public street, and can only be developed in connection to the development of Outlot A. The south boundary line of Outlot B jogs near its midpoint, and the property owner to the south has constructed a fence that encroaches onto the applicant's property. The applicant proposes to subdivide the narrow strip of the lot that contains the fence, which would then be concurrently joined to the adjoining property (Hawk's Bar). ANALYSIS The Subdivision Ordinance, in Section 11-1-7, provides for simple subdivision of lots that are currently platted and do not create more than one new building lot. The Ordinance allows for such "simple subdivisions" to proceed without requiring a full plat or the normal public hearing requirements that larger subdivisions entail. Such subdivisions result in a "metes and bounds" description, essentially describing parts of the underlying platted lots. Occasionally, the County Recorder determines that the new descriptions are not recordable. While staff does not anticipate that likelihood in this case, in that were to occur, a plat would be required, and the applicants would need to reapply for a platted subdivision. The proposed subdivision would create, temporarily, a parcel that is 60 feet in length, and between 1.0 and 1.4 feet in width — a total of approximately 72 square feet. This strip of land is at the rear of the subject property, and does not affect street frontage for either property. The applicants would convey this narrow strip which would then be joined to the abutting property, resulting in the existing fence being shifted to the owner of the property to the south. Neither the B-2 nor the B-3 District have minimum lot area requirements, and as such, the transfer of 72 square feet will not impact zoning compliance. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW & RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this item at its regular meeting on June 4th, 2019. After review, the Planning Commission recommended approval unanimously. It was confirmed that the townhome project proposed previously for the site is not moving forward. No public hearing is required for this item. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Planning Commission unanimously recommends Alternative 1 below. 1. Motion to approve the simple subdivision and lot combination of Outlot B, River Mill, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z and based on findings in Resolution No. PC -2019-014. 2. Motion to deny the simple subdivision and lot combination of Outlot B, River Mill, based on findings to be cited at the City Council meeting. 2 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 3. Motion to table action on the request, subject to additional information from staff or the applicant. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the subdivision and lot combination, based on findings that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not impact requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for either subject property, as well as compliance with the conditions identified in Exhibit Z. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC 2019-014 B. Aerial Image of Subject Site C. Exhibit of Simple Subdivision and Combination Area D. Legal Descriptions a. Current Legal Description, Southerly Parcel b. Proposed Legal Description, Northerly Parcel c. Proposed Legal Description, Northerly Parcel Z. Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT Z Simple Subdivision Outlots A and B, River Mill Conditions of approval for the proposed Simple Subdivision and Lot Combination: 1. Combination and recording of the subdivided strip of land to the adjoining property to the south, concurrent with recording of the subdivision. 2. In the event the County rejects the descriptions of the metes and bounds subdivision, the applicant will need to re -apply and utilize a formal plat process. 3. Compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer as identified. 3 Planning Commission Agenda — 06/05/2019 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND LOT COMBINATION OF OUTLOT B, RIVER MILL WHEREAS, the applicant is the owner of two parcels consisting of Outlots A and B, River Mill; and WHEREAS, the subject property (Outlot B) has no public street frontage; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to subdivide the subject Outlot B into two lots for the purpose of transferring a portion to the neighboring property to the south; and WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned B-2 and the adjoining lot B-3, and the proposed lots will continue to meet the applicable zoning requirements; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision qualifies for a simple subdivision process under the terms of the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the matter at its regular meeting on June 4`b 2019, and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision creates lots that will continue to meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed subdivision qualifies as a "simple subdivision" under the terms of the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance for purposes of processing. Planning Commission Agenda — 06/05/2019 4. The proposed subdivision, with the concurrent lot combination, will make the existing fence a more conforming condition. 5. The proposed subdivision will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the proposed subdivision is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit Z of the staff report on the matter, as follows: 1. Combination and recording of the subdivided strip of land to the adjoining property to the south, concurrent with recording of the subdivision. 2. In the event the County rejects the descriptions of the metes and bounds subdivision, the applicant will need to re -apply and utilize a formal plat process. 3. Compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer as identified. ADOPTED this 4h day of June, 2019, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION LOW Director 2 11 1 1 _s 40� 17 UIN some 0 ri �warr : r .r ' ! t � �.. r. OUTLOT A 3 � � RIVER RIVER MILL W VIEW m OUTLOT B SQUARE J in ?N W W PROPOSED EASEMENT o 0 v� n ' N89°51'56"W 65.04 o S88°59'03"E 65,00 --' CHAIN LINK FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE --' South Line of Outlot B, RIVER MILL. CONCRETE - RETAINING ------ S W.Corner of Outlot B, WALL I RIVER MILL m v Proposed Fencing Easement That part of Outlot B, RIVER MILL, Wright County, Minnesota described as follow: •. Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Outlot B; thence easterly along the South line of said Outlot a distance of 65.00 feet; thence northerly at a right angle a distance of 2.00 feet; thence westerly to a point on the West line of said Outlot B NORTH distant 1.00 feet North of said Southwest corner; thence southerly along said West line a distance of 1.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. 0 20 PROJECT NO. SP019001 FILE NAME: VESMTSP0001.dwg EASEMENT EXHIBIT •Y� LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR HAWK'S SPORTS BAR, INC. Parcel A (PID 155-500-182301) That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence North along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 1115.61 feet to the northerly right of way line of Wright County Highway No. 75 being a point distant 75.00 feet North of the centerline of said Wright County Highway No. 75 as measured at right angle from said centerline, said point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continue North along said West line, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of Government Lot 4 of said Section 18, a distance of 100 feet; thence South parallel with said West line of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence West parallel with said South line of Government Lot 4, a distance of 100.00 feet to the point of beginning. and Lot 16, Auditor's Subdivision No. 1 lying Northerly of Highway 75, according to plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, in and for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. Located in Section 13, Township 121, Range 25. Schedule A Legal Description Outlot A and B, River Mill, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Wright County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom the following parcel: That part of Outlot B, RIVER MILL, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Outlot B; thence easterly along the South line of said Outlot a distance of 65.00 feet; thence northerly at a right angle a distance of 2.00 feet; thence westerly to a point on the West line of said Outlot B distant 1.00 feet North of said Southwest corner; thence southerly along said West line a distance of 1.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. WARNING • UNAUTHORIZED COPYING OF THIS FORM PROHIBITED Schedule A Legal Description That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence North along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 1115.61 feet to the northerly right of way line of Wright County Highway No. 75 being a point distant 75.00 feet North of the centerline of said Wright County Highway No. 75 as measured at right angle from said centerline, said point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continue North along said West line, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of Government Lot 4 of said Section 18, a distance of 100 feet; thence South parallel with said West line of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence West parallel with said South line of Government Lot 4, a distance of 100.00 feet to the point of beginning. AND Lot 16, Auditor's Subdivision No. 1 lying Northerly of Highway 75, according to plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, in and for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. Located in Section 13, Township 121, Range 25. Also, that part of Outlot B, RIVER MILL, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Outlot B, thence easterly along the South line of said Outlot a distance of 65.00 feet, Thence northerly at a right angle a distance of 2.00 feet, thence westerly to a point on the West line of said Outlot B distant 1.00 feet North of said Southwest corner, thence southerly along said West line a distance of 1.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. kW,RNINO - UNI! U T HOR!ZED COPYINC OF THIS FORM PROHIBITED City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2R. Consideration of accepting quotes and awarding a contract for the 2019 Street Light Painting Proiect to Pole Painting Plus of Maple Lake, MN in the amount of $14,280. (TM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider accepting quotes and awarding a contract for the 2019 Street Light Painting Project. The structures located on School Boulevard from Edmonson Avenue to Redford Lane, Deegan Avenue, Deegan Court, and Cedar Street between Chelsea Road and Dundas Road were quoted this year. The product specifications for the project will be an HI -Solids Polyurethane and DTM Wash Primer from Sherwin Williams in the color of Mississippi Bronze to match the other city owned street lights. Public Works advertised a request for quotes and received three quotes, with the low quote from Pole Painting Plus of Maple Lake for $14,280. The second quote was from Cobalt Companies of Monticello for $19,125 and the third quote was from Electro Signs of Blaine for $39,600. Electro Signs did not have their quote in by the due date so it was rejected. Pole Painting Plus is the company we are recommending, in the past this company has done stop light painting projects for the city and we have been satisfied with their work. Al. Budget Impact: In preparation for this project, appropriate funds were placed in the 2019 Street Department Budget for street light maintenance. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The contractor is estimating the project will take approximately two weeks, weather permitting, starting the first part of August. A city inspector will do periodic inspections on the job site. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to accept quotes and award contract for 2019 Street Light Painting Project to Pole Painting Plus of Maple Lake, MN based on their low quote o $14,280. 2. Motion to deny awarding a contract for the project at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends awarding a contract to Pole Painting Plus for the 2019 Street Light Painting Project as outlined in Alternative #1. The Public Works and Engineering Departments will be inspecting the project to see that the contractor adheres to the plans and specifications. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • 2019 Project Map. Street Light Painting Map May 21, 2019 City Boundary anw � Monticello 1 inch = 752 feet N A City of Monticello I Wright County Map Powered byD mIJ,ck from WSB & Associates City Council Agenda: 06/24/19 2S. Consideration of accepting the quote and awarding contract for the 2019 Street Pavement Marking Proiect to AAA Striping Service for an estimated cost of $45,353 (TM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Quotes were requested and opened on June 18th at 2 p.m. at city hall for the 2019 Street Pavement Marking Project. Only one quote was submitted, and it was from AAA Striping Service Co. of St. Michael which came in well under budget at $30,687.98. Council is asked to consider accepting the quote plus adding portions of East and West Chelsea Road to the project. The original quote did not have Chelsea Road included, but due to the good pricing and budget, staff would like to add portions of Chelsea Road to the project. Adding Chelsea Road to the project brings the total estimated cost of the project to $45,352.98, but the final cost may vary slightly depending on the exact amount of footage. Appropriate funds have been placed in the Street Department budget for this project. Attached as supporting data is a copy of the RFQ, the submitted quote from AAA Striping, and an area map and linear feet of the project. The streets in the original quote will be chip sealed this year and the pavement marking project will be coordinated with that project. While Chelsea Road does not receive a chip seal this year, those pavement markings need to be refreshed. Al. Budget Impact: In preparation for this project, sufficient funds were placed in the 2019 Street Department Budget. A2. Staff Workload Impact: A project of this size normally takes two to three days. The project will be inspected by the city Engineering Dept. and Public Works. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to accept the quote and adding portions of Chelsea Road to the pavement marking project and awarding the contract to AAA Striping Service Co. of St. Michael, MN for an estimated cost of $45,353 depending on exact linear feet for the project. 2. Motion to deny the quote with the addition of Chelsea Road with a cost estimate of $45,353 and go with the original specs and quote of $30,688. 3. Motion to deny the project at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the City Council approve Alternative #1, accepting the quote and adding portions of Chelsea Road to the project, awarding the contract to AAA Striping Services Co. for a total estimated cost of $45,353 depending on exact linear feet for the project. The Public Works and Engineering Departments will be inspecting the project to see that the contractor adheres to the plans and specifications. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Pavement Marking RFQ B. AAA Services Quote. C. Maps of original project area and the Chelsea Road additions City of Monticello REQUEST FOR QUOTES (RFQ) Pavement Marking for the City of Monticello The City of Monticello is soliciting quotes for street pavement markings. The contractor will furnish all labor, materials, permits, traffic control and equipment to perform all work necessary and incidental to the completion of the project. Pavement markings will include: DESCRIPTION *LINEAR FEET • 4" Solid Line White -Paint Epoxy 49,470 • 4" Broken Line White -Paint Epoxy 820 • 4" Broken Line Yellow -Paint Epoxy 18,095 • 4" Solid Line Yellow -Paint Epoxy 8,375 • 4" Double Solid Yellow -Paint Epoxy 11,665 • 24" Solid Line Yellow -Paint Epoxy 1,655 * Linear feet listed are estimates • There are several left and righthand turn arrows on the project, price to be quoted per arrow. Materials shall meet the requirements of Mn/DOT 2582, in the most current edition of the Standard Specifications for Construction Manual. Epoxy paint is required for all markings and shall meet the requirements of Mn/DOT "Specifications for Epoxy Pavement Markings". Glass beads are required and shall meet the requirements of Mn/DOT "Specifications for Glass Beads, Drop -on Type for Reflectorizing Traffic Paint". Paint for pavement markings shall meet the requirements of Mn/DOT "Specifications for White and Yellow, Three Minute Dry, Alkyd Traffic Paints". • Please refer to the Specifications for a complete list of the streets included in the project. Please contact the following person or department for more information or to request specifications for the project: Name: Department: Tom Moores Public Works Phone and/or Cell: 763-271-3277 (office) or 612-685-1098 (cell) Email: tom.moores@ci.monticello.mn.us To submit an RFQ or quote, the submission should be sealed and plainly marked with the project name on the sealed envelope. Quotes may be dropped off or mailed to the following address: Monticello Public Works Attn: Tom Moores 909 Golf Course Road Monticello, MN 55362 Quotes are due by: 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 18, 2019 City of Monticello REQUEST FOR QUOTES (RFQ) Pavement Marking for the City of Monticello NOTES The City of Monticello reserves the right to reject any or all quotes, to waive technical specifications or deficiencies, and to accept any quote it may deem is in the best interest of the City. The Contractor must comply with all local and State laws, rules, and regulations; provide their state contractor licensing information, and provide proof of other licenses or certifications that might be required as a condition of the project. Contractor will be required to meet the insurance specifications as needed for the project and as required by law. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to supply all necessary tools, supplies and equipment to perform the work as requested. Any prime contractor or subcontractor that does not meet the minimum criteria established for a "responsible contractor" as defined in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3, or fails to verify that it meets those criteria is not a responsible contractor and is not eligible to be awarded a construction contract for the Project or to perform work on the Project. Responding contractors shall submit to the City a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying compliance with each of the minimum criteria in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3. at the time that it responds to this solicitation document. A prime contractor shall submit to the City, upon request, copies of the signed verifications of compliance from all subcontractors. A false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria shall make the prime contractor or subcontractor that makes the false statement ineligible to be awarded a construction project and may result in termination of a contract awarded to a prime contractor or subcontractor that submits a false statement. The Contractor shall invoice the City within 30 days of the completed project at the rates agreed to in the contract. The City shall make payment within 35 days of receipt of invoice unless other terms are written in the contract. The City of Monticello shall retain the right to terminate the contract with seven (7) days notice should the Contractor fail to perform work in a professional manner or perform the work within the demands and time constraints established by the City of Monticello. Failure to maintain necessary licenses and/or insurance coverage is grounds for termination of the Contract. The contract could be terminated upon mutual agreement between the Owner and the Contractor, provided that at least 30 days notice is given by either party prior to termination. The contract may be terminated by the City at any time upon discovery by the City that the prime contractor or subcontractor has submitted a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria set forth in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3. Contractor will be required to indemnify the City against all suits, claims, judgments, awards, loss, cost or expense (including attorney's fees without limitation) arising in any way out of the Contractor's performance or non-performance of its obligations under the Service Contract. Contractor will defend all such actions with counsel satisfactory to Owner at its own expense, including attorney's fees, and will satisfy any judgment rendered against Owner in such action. i-waga 'ffAf June 17, 2019 Monticello Public Works Attn: Tom Moores 909 Golf Course Road Monticello, MN 55362 Re: 2019 Pavement Striping AAA Striping Service Co. p 763.428.4322 12220 43rd Street NE, St. Michael, MN 55376 f 763.428.8557 AAA Striping Service Company agrees to do in a workmanlike manner the work specified in your request for quotation. All materials and application conform to MN/DOT specifications. All materials, tools, equipment and labor to be furnished by AAA Striping Service. Work to be completed as soon as possible, weather and other conditions beyond contractor's control permitting. Contract prices would be as follows: Thank you very much for the opportunity to quote this project. Sincerely, hirley Presi ent Pavement Markinas of All Tvnes - Installed & Removed Quantity Unit Amount 4' Solid Line White Epoxy 49,470 LF $ 0.21 $10,388.70 4" Broken Line White Epoxy 820 LF 0.10 $ 82.00 4" Broken Line Yellow Epoxy 181095 LF 0.44 796.18 4" Solid Line Yellow Epoxy 8,375 LF 0.22 1,842.50 4" Double Line Yellow Epoxy 111665 LF 0.44 5,132.60 24" Solid Line Yellow Epoxy 11655 LF 6.20 10,261.00 Pavement Message Left Arrow Epoxy 19 EA 95.00 11805.00 Pavement Message Right Arrow Epoxy 4 EA 95.00 380.00 Total $30,687.98 Thank you very much for the opportunity to quote this project. Sincerely, hirley Presi ent Pavement Markinas of All Tvnes - Installed & Removed I U Z) AA6TH d PRAIRIE yRIVER m I0 SANDY R/SFR o F,�o,VT 110/-11 39 Z 25 CLUB VIEW y 6Tti e� ,oma 4TN z 0 J gRkpCgC 1o1s� > g4 pR V/SS/SS/pp/ q TF 99TH y RIVERVIEVV = n SAVANNA e� MI LL RAN U _ x � _ < SFq qy J mF o c7 (D9? Z DUNDAS of Q T N O O z OAK 95TH O MEP�Ow ILu SCHOOL Y \ Q O z STARLIN p LLJ _ O J CITY O) Monticello 25 J pgRKLL (D z 2019 Pavement Marking Lu LL DEER 87TH 0 0.4 0.8 1.6 Miles U) M m J Lu n O U = I i i I i i i I 85TH 85TH �9S a5 84TH 84TH S'o'turce: Es�ri, Digitall'G'lobe, Geo:E�y^,e!}Ea :hstar G oe graphics, NAPS,/ it >us�D+.S�]iUSDA;�l�SGS A�....... ©GRID IGN, an _I the ument Path: JAseal coat projects\2018 Seal Coat Project\Map of 2018 Chip Seal Project.mxd 411yr. 39 II Chelsea Rd Addition Map June 19, 2019 p • a �` t ' i L , IqitCFY `� f 1 �_' . • .. - �i,j A. v, •t• J. I City Boundary 1 inch = 1,505 feet Monticello A City of Monticello I Wright County Map Powered by Batat-ink from WSB &Associates City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 2T. Consideration to approve a final scope and contract with The Lakota Group/WSB for the Monticello 2040 Communitv Vision & Comprehensive Plan. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of a final scope of work and contract for the Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan (Phases 1 and 2) with The Lakota Group/WSB consulting team. The final scope and contract represent a revised scope from that included with the response to Request for Proposal, reviewed by the City Council in May. Changes and additions are noted in bold and/or yellow highlight in the Professional Fee Estimate component of the documents. Phase 1 includes more support time for community engagement activities and additional conference calls with City staff. Phase 2 has been revised to included a shift in timeline to mid -to late 2020 due to the potential for regional planning efforts related to a proposed Mississippi River Crossing. The shift in start time will allow at least preliminary discussion or findings to be incorporated into Monticello's Comprehensive Plan. Phase 2 also includes an additional draft review of the document and additional adoption consideration meetings with City boards and Council. Council is advised that should the proposed regional planning efforts move into 2020- 2021 and include additional impacts beyond that anticipated by the scope of this Comprehensive Plan effort, future amendments to the Comprehensive Plan amendments may be necessary. As contract negotiations are private data until the negotiation evaluation is complete, the proposal and agreement documents have been included under separate cover. They will be posted if approved by the Council. Al. Budget Impact: Council has allocated $40,000 in 2019 for the Phase 1 Visioning process of the larger Comprehensive Plan effort. The Phase 1 estimate is within the budgeted range. Phase 2 will be budgeted for 2020 if the contract is approved by the City Council and is within the anticipated range for the project. Expenses associated with travel and other support costs has also been identified within the contract. The contract stipulates that these amounts are not -to -exceed without Council authorization. In addition, there will be accessory expenses in Phases 1 and 2 for financial consultation services with Northland Securities, which staff would initially estimate at $5,000 - $10,000. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Comprehensive Planning is one of the most staff -intensive projects a City undertakes. Once the final scope of work detailed, a more accurate staff workload impact can be provided. City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 A3. Strategic Plan Impact: The Comprehensive Plan serves as a platform for many of the implementation documents used by the City, including the Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan is the City of Monticello's organizational plan to support implementation of the Comprehensive Plan vision and goals. The documents inform one another. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the final scope and Professional Services Agreement with The Lakota Group/WSB for the Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan. 2. Motion to deny entering into the final scope and Agreement with The Lakota Group/WSB for the Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan. 3. Motion to table action based on the direction of the City Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff and the project interview team recommends Alternative 1. The recommendation is based on the feedback received during the proposal review process, the recommendation of the Planning Commission/City Council interview team, as well as the follow-up reference and scope discussions. The recommendation considers project approach, team experience, community engagement strategy, project component scope, and budget. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan RFP B. Lakota Group/WSB Proposal — Original, Submitted April 1, 2019 (provided under separate cover) C. Professional Services Agreement D. Revised Budget Scope (provided under separate cover) MONTICELLO 2040 Request for Proposal to Prepare a Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan Proposal Due Date/Time April 1, 2019 4:00 p.m. (CST) I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The City of Monticello, Minnesota is seeking a consulting firm(s) with considerable experience in scenario -based strategic planning, community design, land use planning, economic analysis, and community engagement to prepare a Community Vision and update the city's Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the project is 1) to provide the community with a clear vision for its future developed by an engaged and informed community and 2) the strategies to achieve that vision, ultimately reflected in an updated Comprehensive Plan. The plan documents should be visually appealing, usable, and legally defensible. The plan will address the transformational issues at work in the community and region, which will shape Monticello over the next 20 years. These issues will include fundamental changes in tax base, land use, and transportation, among others. In addition, with an Orderly Annexation Agreement in place with Monticello Township, which will expire in 2025, the 2040 Plan will recognize the opportunities for growth and development in this area and focus on engaging township residents in the process. The 2040 plan is a shift in character, process and format in comparison to the existing 2008 Comprehensive Plan. While prior Comprehensive Plans serve as context, the 2040 plan will represent an innovative and transformative blueprint for Monticello's future. The city intends for the 2040 plan to be a community -oriented plan organized around a shared vision and actionable outcomes. The plan will be completed in two phases. A. Phase 1: Scenario Planning & Community Visioning The first phase of the project will require a futurist planning strategy, employing scenario - based planning tools. The first task is the identification of issues that will shape the community for the next 20 years. Initial community -wide input will be gathered on trends and forces with the goal of developing specific scenarios for Monticello 2040. Harnessing transformational forces will be a critical component of this planning effort. The consultant will then work with the community to define a preferred alternative scenario for the identified issues, culminating in the development of a shared community vision and specific, concise guiding action statements to inform the second phase of the plan. B. Phase 2: Comprehensive Planning The second phase of the project is the preparation of the city's guiding document for growth and development over the next 20 years. The Comprehensive Plan document will emphasize the relationship between the vision and action statements established in the first phase and the plan's specific study components. This phase of the planning effort will provide clear direction and guidance for decision making within the traditional comprehensive plan chapters. The Comprehensive Plan will also clearly articulate the inter -relatedness of the study components. 21 Page COMMUNITY VISION & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This process supports and informs 49v --- IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTS `� 4 r Plan Data Analysis/Community Context Issue Identification i Scenario Development Preferred Scenario Selection Action Statement Development i Vision Statement Comprehensive Planning A • Land Use • Economic Development • Parks, Pathways & Open Space • Community Identity & Culture • Transportation Plan • Utility Plan ......................................................... STRATEGIC PLAN 1-11 -1% ,e Governance Model — FA 31 Page II. COMMUNITY BACKGROUND The city of Monticello is a vibrant community located along the Mississippi River. The community is proud of its cultural heritage, excited about its recent growth and development, and determined to develop strategies to confidently meet the challenges of the next 20 years. Monticello was founded by second -generation Americans who migrated west in the mid - 1800s. Founded in 1856, the city grew quickly during the early settlement years and then leveled to a population of about 1,300. Then, between 1969 and 1972, two major events occurred that would have a major impact on the community. During that time, a nuclear power generating plant was constructed and Interstate 94 was completed, skirting the southern boundary of the original city site. The city of Monticello is now a free-standing urban fringe city with its growth driven by a prime location on Interstate 94 between the Minneapolis/St Paul Metro area and the City of St. Cloud. The residential population is currently estimated at 13,000. However, the population of the Monticello area as a regional center is far in excess of 13,000, as Monticello is located along a heavily traveled commuter route. It is estimated that the population within a five -mile radius of the city is over 50,000. It is important to note that Monticello is not a suburban commuter city; rather Monticello acts as a regional center, offering a variety of workforce opportunities with a comparable ratio of those commuting in for work as out. Although a cross-section of housing stock in both age and value exists in the community, much of the population growth in the last thirty years been fueled by development of starter homes and townhomes. The city offers a full range of services to residents and is home to the CentraCare Monticello hospital, Independent School District #882, and other institutions that serve the community. Non-profit and volunteer organizations round out an active and involved Monticello. The city also maintains over 100 acres of parkland and 11+ miles of paved pathways for both passive and active play recreation. Residents enjoy access to the Monticello Community Center which features a water park, fitness center, track, basketball court, senior center, indoor playground, meeting space, and City Hall. In addition, the City of Monticello and Wright County have partnered to acquire and operate 1,200 acres of open space in Wright County, known as the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. This irreplaceable natural area includes undisturbed shoreline and natural habitat, as well as 120 acres for a city -owned and operated regional athletic park. Monticello is also a regional hub of commercial development, owing to its location at the intersection of State Highway 25 and I-94. The increase in residential population along the I- 94 corridor, coupled with excellent transportation access, propelled recent commercial growth. The community is home to both large franchises and local retail and commerce. 41 Page Previous land use and utility planning initiatives have provided the resources necessary to serve commercial users. The city is now reaping the benefit of such investments. Development along Highway 25 and I-94 anchors commercial centers which include the noted major retailers. Sufficient land is available to support continued commercial development in these areas. Redevelopment of the downtown area has also become a major focus of the city. Recognizing the downtown as the heart of the community, investments in events, arts and culture, buildings, and property have taken center stage over the last two years. For the purposes of industrial development, the City actively markets 50 acres of public industrial property with collector road and utilities, and is currently marketing the property to qualifying industrial users. There is also available private industrial land located throughout the community, but industrial land supply is an issue for consideration. The need for additional industrial land for workforce and tax base expansion will be a major issue for Monticello looking forward. The city, with an active Economic Development Authority, has been very aggressive in its economic development strategies and is focused on workforce development and growth in tax base. The city has created a number of TIF districts, which support both new development in industrial areas and redevelopment in the original downtown. Monticello's tax base relies heavily on the presence of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP), which currently represents over 55% of the tax base for the city. The city is actively pursuing strategies to diversify and strengthen the tax base and manage the fluctuations in valuation at the MNGP. With the development and implementation of a city -based fiber-optic system, coupled with a second privately owned and operated fiber-optic system, Monticello residents and businesses are well-positioned to take advantage of the digital age. An annexation agreement is in place to accommodate future growth and development within Monticello Township. The agreement provides for development which makes the most of the amenities of the area, while preserving agricultural resources and open space. Monticello is also aware of its central location within the region. Growth southward into the city's annexation area, as well as growth pressure from the communities of Big Lake and Becker to the north, have created a need for Monticello to reach out to neighboring communities to think more broadly about transportation, utility and economic development. In summary, because of geographic location and rich history, Monticello features aspects of an older small town, as well as the needs of a growing regional center outside the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan area. 51 Page III. OUTLOOK Phase 1 of the 2040 comprehensive planning project requires that the selected consulting firm(s) present a creative and inclusive approach to support a community -wide identification of forces and needs likely to influence Monticello's next 20 years. The selected consultant will bring a future -forward approach to the identification and actualization of transformative forces affecting Monticello, and will develop truly creative and differentiating solutions. While Phase 1 will require a community-based effort, looking toward 2040, the city has identified a preliminary set of issues which have the potential to shape the community. These matters are described briefly below. 1. Current Orderly Annexation Agreement The City of Monticello and Monticello Township have an agreement for orderly annexation of a large portion of the township which expires in 2025. Phase 1 of the Plan will engage the township residents in discussions on future planning for the annexation area and new ideas for growth and annexation. The recognition of township residents and property owners as stakeholders in the process is important to fostering a broader vision of the Monticello community. Continued efforts to coordinate planning are critical. 2. Xcel Energy Transition Monticello is home to the Xcel Energy Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP). The MNGP is currently licensed through 2030 and at present represents 55% of Monticello's tax base. Xcel Energy/Northern States Power also controls approximately 600 acres of land surrounding the plant facility. The plan will address the possible and eventual decommissioning of the plant, as well as the remaining fuel storage which may occur on-site. The city seeks to understand the full economic and social impact of the plant within the community and to develop specific strategies to maintain a vibrant, healthy and economically successful community. In addition, the existing Burlington Northern (BNSF) rail spur which runs through the city to the power plant should be evaluated for unexplored opportunity. 3. TH 25 Congestion and Relief Minnesota Trunk Highway 25 between I-94 and State Highway 10 is a vital local transportation artery supporting economic and social well-being in the region. However, congestion on this highway has increased in recent years, creating traffic, development and safety issues for the community. The corridor also provides the only bridge crossing over the Mississippi within a 10 -mile growing suburban area. The bridge crossing is located on TH 25 in Monticello's core downtown, connecting Wright and Sherburne counties. 61 Page A coalition of local jurisdictions was initiated to develop a unified effort among local and state interests for the purposes of joint planning and securing funding for necessary regional transportation improvements. Continued pressure on the corridor and transportation alternatives to relieve the pressure are key topics for the economic future of Monticello and the region. 4. Mississippi River Crossing Resulting from preliminary analysis completed by the Highway 25 Coalition, a study suggesting a new bridge crossing of the Mississippi has been prepared. At present, the study is in draft form and provides optional alignments for the second river crossing. The siting and funding of a river bridge is a significant undertaking. Bridges serve as a connection — between communities and commerce. Monticello is approaching this planning initiative with significant consideration, recognizing the long-term impact that the bridge will have on land use, transportation and economic development. A second bridge connecting Wright and Sherburne Counties has the potential to create incredible, dynamic, and long-lasting economic benefit for the affected communities if sited appropriately. 5. Education A primary partner in the success of any community is the school system. Monticello is fortunate to have an incredible resource in the Monticello School District. The District has undertaken recent strategic planning and is working to define its own innovative path to future success. Incorporating the parents, children, educators, and administration within the school district is a top priority for the planning effort. Feedback from this stakeholder group will support planning related to workforce development, land use planning for future school facilities, pathway and park locations, culture, technology, and much more. In addition, facilitating discussion within the school and at school events will aid in reaching a broader audience with the planning effort and establishing a core of people of all ages committed to the vision of the new Comprehensive Plan. 6. West Interchange A third interchange serving the City of Monticello from the west has been identified in past Comprehensive Plans. An Interchange Land Use Study was developed to analyze land use potential for varying location scenarios. Ideally, the new Comprehensive Plan will incorporate this information and develop land use solutions to utilize and support this interchange. 71 Page 7. Workforce Development The shortage of qualified workforce for Monticello's numerous manufacturers and industries is consistent with trends felt regionally and nationally. Attracting and retaining workers is a high priority for the community, as is growing the workforce. Clearly, the diversification and growth of tax base is related to the potential decommissioning of the Xcel Nuclear Plant and Monticello's future economic viability. The development of an educated, trained and engaged workforce that contributes not only economically to the community, but in residential and other social sectors, is also vital. 8. Priority Growth Areas, Transitional Land Use & Housing The city will need to work through a prioritization of future growth areas. The prioritization will evaluate infrastructure, transportation, utilities, and amenities. It will look at a changing dynamic between land uses, where the lines between industry and commerce merge, and where workers seek to live closer to both. A more focused look at the Orderly Annexation Area Sections, including opportunities for unique development patterns and styles (such as cluster housing) and locations for life -cycle housing is required. The previous Comprehensive Plan also did not identify density for undeveloped guided residential areas. A conversation on density is needed to better focus utility and transportation extensions and growth areas. Identification of density will also assist developers in evaluating project siting. 9. Community Identity and Culture Although Monticello has strong historic roots anchored by the Mississippi River, its local community identity lacks coherence and clarity. There is not currently a cohesive and recognized statement of "who we are" and a defining statement of "who we will be 10. Regionalization Monticello is a sub -regional center, acting as a hub for commerce and services to the surrounding communities given its location on prime transportation corridors. The community should evaluate opportunities to capitalize on this central location to work with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize growth potential and efficiency. Smart growth benefiting all is also occurring due to changes in utility infrastructure, including the location of a Google data center in neighboring Becker. The review of comprehensive plans and utility plans in adjacent communities will need to be part of the full comprehensive planning process. 81 Page 11. Sherburne County Rail Park A study has been completed for an approximately 3,200 -acre rail -based industrial park in Sherburne County. While the magnitude of the proposal will require years of planning and investment, the completed study includes conceptual park designs and projected economic impacts. The BNSF main rail line between Seattle and the Twin Cities and Chicago to the east running through the Sherburne County provides the basis for the proposal. The rail park as proposed represents significant regional impact including an estimated 16,000 to 17,000 jobs, along with traffic and multiplier development. Monticello's proximity to the proposed development and its role as a regional center requires that Monticello continue to monitor the project's progress and potential for impact. This includes the potential for a new river crossing route. 12. Demographics, Diversity & Equity Monticello, like many communities, will need to address changing trends in demographics and determine the best methods for ensuring equity among its stakeholders. In 2019 the city is engaging with the League of Minnesota Cities, the Government Alliance on Race & Equity, and cohort cities to learn more about how to evaluate internal structures and organize future practices and policies using racial equity tools. The city's goal is to incorporate these ideas and tools into our planning efforts. 13. Technology Rapidly advancing technologies affect us all - autonomous vehicles, green energy, workforce mobility, etc. Monticello's vision and comprehensive plan will recognize that innovation provides a pathway to success and the possibilities are limitless. The comprehensive plan should address the possibilities as opportunities and prepare a roadmap to reach its full potential. 91 Page IV. PROJECT GOALS The Phase 1 planning and visioning effort is intended to result in a document which can be used by the community at -large, but also serves as the foundation for the comprehensive planning effort for Phase 2 of the project. The Phase 2 2040 Comprehensive Plan document is anticipated to be a significant update of the city's existing 2008 plan. Rather than a standard technical document, the city is seeking a plan which is anchored by a clear vision for the future and written in a way which ensures its use as a guiding document for city decisions. Project goals for both documents include the following. 1. Futuristic: creative, imaginative, agile, and out-of-the-box examination of the forces - both large and small - that will change the community; 2. Community -focused: plans developed by the people that live, work, learn, and recreate in greater Monticello; 3. Inclusive: reflect a process which incorporates the many viewpoints, needs, and opinions of the residents and community stakeholders; 4. Consensus -based: organized around a shared vision and community -developed guiding action statement principles; 5. Accessible: easy -to -read, easy-to-use, with a strong emphasis on visual interest and the use of photographs, charts, tables, and picto-/infographs; 6. Strategic: responds directly to the shared vision with action -oriented statements and focused on measurable outcomes; 7. Connected: acknowledge and address the inter -relatedness of the various planning elements that create and shape community; 8. Data -driven: provide an evidence -based framework for decision-making; 9. Transparent: the planning process and its related impacts should be made clear to stakeholders; and 10. Accountable: detail implementation and suggested measurement tools to support achievement of the vision. 101 Page V. SCOPE OF WORK The following is a general description of the tasks required of the consultant(s). A final scope of services will be negotiated and finalized once a consultant is selected. In preparing a proposal, the consultant should feel free to modify, revise or otherwise amend the list of tasks to best satisfy the project goals identified previously. 1. Initial meeting with city staff to review the project scope, schedule, and deliverables; map out final project timeline; begin the process of data collection and issues analysis; and clarify any outstanding questions or concerns. 2. Confirm plan format to include vision, guiding action statements, plan sections and implementation outcomes. 3. In partnership with city staff, develop and implement the community engagement effort, including plan branding and project communications. 4. Regular project meetings with staff and technical advisory team. 5. Preparation of meeting summaries for all staff and engagement meetings and events. 6. Periodic reports to the City Administrator and Community Development Director. 7. Specific to Phase 1: o Project initiation meeting with staff and technical advisory team. o Develop the Community Context. ■ The data that describes who we are. ■ The data which provides insight into opportunities for growth and development on which Monticello can capitalize. ■ The data that describes who we will be. o Facilitate a community -wide preferred scenario plan resulting from an issues identification and response scenario process. o Develop specific guiding action statements in support of the preferred scenarios. o Establish the shared vision. o Prepare a finalized document for adoption by the City Council to include: ■ Vision Statement ■ Action Statements ■ Preferred Scenarios ■ Community Context ■ Appendix of Engagement 8. Specific to Phase 2: o Project initiation meeting with staff and technical advisory team. o Review, update, and revise as applicable the contents of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan consistent with the city's vision and guiding action statements. 111 Page o The Phase 2 project document will include the following components: • Executive Summary • Land Use: Chapter will require comprehensive review and analysis. o Residential o Commercial o Industrial o Parks, Pathways & Open Space o Downtown o Transition Areas/Mixed Use o Community Spaces & Uses • Economic Development: Chapter will require comprehensive review and analysis. This will include consultation with the city's financial consultant, Northland Securities, to respond to and develop recommended strategies. o Tax Base o Workforce o Development o Redevelopment • Transportation: Chapter requires a minor update of the vehicular component, including interchange location selection, with primary focus on pedestrian and bicycle components. o Vehicular o Pedestrian o Bicycle o Rail • Parks, Pathways & Open Space: Chapter requires a minor update of the main components, with primary focus on the incorporation of noted guidance and development of the Downtown Open Space Plan. o Existing Parks & Pathways o System Objectives o System Plan — Parks and Pathways ■ Incorporation of Natural Resource Inventory & Assessment ■ Incorporation of Pathway Connections Guide Map ■ Incorporation of regional parks and pathway information ■ Incorporation of Safe Routes to School Plan recommendations o Downtown Open Space Plan • Utilities: RESERVED. Review current information as part of process. a. Water b. Sanitary Sewer c. Storm Sewer d. Green Infrastructure • Community Identity & Culture: New chapter to be developed for the 2040 plan. 121 Page o Plan chapters shall include specific support relating to the vision and guiding action statements. o Any analysis completed in conjunction with the TH 25 Coalition will be required to be incorporated into the applicable chapters of the plan, including but not limited to: Lane Use, Economic Development and Transportation. o The Coalition of Utility Cities' study on community and economic impact for utility transition will be required to be evaluated in the updating of applicable chapters of the plan. o Plan chapters shall include an implementation component for each chapter. o Plan shall include recommendations for suggested measurement against guiding action statements and vision. o As previously noted, the process shall include regular meetings with the technical advisory team. o Presentations and engagement with advisory boards or commissions as necessary for plan chapters. o Complete a legal review with the City Attorney for compliance with the requirements of Municipal Planning Act. 9. Presentation of draft plan sections to various boards/commissions, including all required public hearings, and final draft to Planning Commission and City Council for approval. 131 Page VI. ENGAGEMENT The project will require an extensive community engagement process. The project is specifically intended to foster relationships between city leaders, staff, residents, and area stakeholders. Selected consultant(s) will anticipate involvement and coordination of engagement activities with city staff. The selected consultant(s) will provide a clear understanding of roles of staff and consultant in engagement activities as part of the proposal document. It is anticipated that Phase I of the project will require the most intense community engagement activity. Community -wide involvement is critical to building a shared vision and commitment to the project by the numerous stakeholders. Phase 2 of the project will continue to require community input at key points throughout the process, which are to be identified by the consultant based on project approach. For purposes of the 2040 Plan, the city's high priority populations to engage include: • Families • Low-income populations • Youth • Diverse and immigrant populations • Monticello Township residents • Seniors • Community partners: o School District o Hospital o Business and Industry o Community organizations and non -profits • Regional partners — Monticello Township, cities of Big Lake and Becker, Wright and Sherburne counties It is expected that the selected consultant(s) will utilize a variety of tools and forums to achieve community -wide participation, including but not limited to those listed below. Professionally prepared and presented digital and print materials are a priority. • Website pages and updates • Social media posts — invitations and summaries • Non-traditional meeting venues • Engagement at partner locations • Pop-up meetings • Focus groups and workshops • Public presentation software and resources (visual preference, smart phone polling, etc.) • Portable project summary boards • E -newsletter • Press releases • Surveys (to the extent useful) 141 Page VII. TIMELINE (SUGGESTED) 1. April 1, 2019 2. April 2019 3. May 2019 4. May 2019 5. June - October 2019 6. November 2019 7. December 2019 Proposal Submittals Due (REQUIRED) Proposal Review and Interview Select Consultant(s), Contract Begin Phase 1- Data Analysis Community Scenario Planning & Visioning Formal Public/Board Review of Visioning Document and Guiding Action Statements Adopt Vision and Guiding Action Statements The following timeline for Phase 2 is dependent on the prior phase completion, adequacy of preparation and review time, and the availability of other resource data and studies, and may be adjusted forward into 2020/2021 at the discretion of the City in conjunction with the selected consultant(s). 8. January 2020 9. February - September 2020 10. October - December 2020 11. December 2020 VIII. DELIVERABLES Begin Phase 2 - Data Analysis Prepare and Draft Phase 2 - Comprehensive Plan Formal Public/Board Review of Comprehensive Plan Adopt Final Comprehensive Plan The following items are required deliverables of the project and should be incorporated into your proposal narrative, timeline, work plan, and budget. 1. Project website pages and updates (itemize as separate budget line item). 2. Electronic copies of all process and plan communication. 3. Electronic copies of the two plan documents (Phase 1 and 2), in edit -ready formats (Text in Word or Adobe InDesign format required, graphics in Adobe InDesign or Adobe Illustrator format, maps to be provided in both .dwg layers and .pdf) IX. QUALIFICATIONS AND ROLES Multidisciplinary teams, which may be a single firm or a consultant team consisting of individuals and/or firms with specialized expertise, are encouraged to submit a proposal. Qualified firms will demonstrate: 1. Familiarity with scenario -based strategic planning 2. Experience at successfully developing consensus -based plans 3. Strong facilitation and engagement skills 4. Experience at gathering and utilizing data to inform the planning process 5. Knowledge of communications and branding 151 Page 6. Ability to constructively challenge key participants 7. Experience inspiring stakeholders to think innovatively S. Extensive experience in land use planning 9. Ability to coordinate among multiple stakeholders X. OWNERSHIP & RIGHTS The City of Monticello reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technical specifications or deficiencies, and to accept any proposal that it may deem to be in the best interest of the city. Although not preferred, the City reserves the right to select different consulting proposals for Phases 1 and 2. All work products and intellectual property resulting from the contract and defined scope of work and intellectual property will become the property of the City of Monticello. XI. BUDGET The total budget for Phase 1 of the project is $40,000. Phase 2 is anticipated to be budgeted for 2020. City staff is available to assist in completing and reviewing various plan sections, provide greater detail, context, and history, gather data, assist in meeting facilitations, and offer technical support. Additionally, City Hall is located within the Monticello Community Center and is equipped with media projection, production equipment, large format plotting and reproduction equipment, and meeting space. City staff can assist in arranging additional meeting and engagement event space at locations throughout the community. The proposed budget total should include all expenses and materials to deliver the work product. The city requests a proposed line item budget as part of the submittal package. The city will not be liable for any costs incurred by the consultant in the preparation of a proposal submitted in response to this RFP, in conduct of a presentation, or other activities related to responding to this RFP. No costs chargeable for work under this proposed contract may be incurred before receipt of either a fully executed contract with the city or specific written authorization from the City of Monticello. The final contract dollar amount will be negotiated with the selected consultant/team. If the city is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the selected firm, negotiations with that firm will terminate and the city may select another firm. 161 Page XII. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL The following materials must be received by 4:00 p.m. (CDT) on Monday, April 1, 2019 for a proposal to be considered. During the evaluation process, the City of Monticello reserves the right to request additional information or seek clarification from a consultant/team, or to allow for corrections of errors and/or omissions. All submissions are to include the following components for each of the two phases, prepared as separate itemized proposals. A. Project Overview 1. General Information: provide a brief overview of firm, including qualifications to execute the contract 2. Proposal Understanding: include a summary of the consultant's understanding of the project as described in this RFP, including the desire by the city for a strategic, community -focused plan B. Qualifications 1. Personal Qualifications: a. Identification of lead project manager and contact information b. Name, proposed role, hourly rate, anticipated time commitment to the project, and biography of each team member 2. References: include a list of at least three municipal clients for which consultant has conducted comprehensive planning, visioning, community engagement and/or land use analysis C. Proposal Submitted materials must provide a clear understanding of the proposed approach 1. Project Overview: provide specific approaches, methods and assumptions that will be utilized to accomplish each task 2. Proposed Work Plan and Schedule: provide a proposed work plan divided into distinct phases and including a list of key tasks, milestones, approximate dates, project deliverables and resource needs 3. Community Engagement Plan: provide an overview of approach including anticipated activities, collaboration with city staff, and efforts to engage high priority populations 4. Budget: identify cost estimates for each segment of the scope of services and work plan. At minimum, identify costs for the following: i. Community engagement activities and materials ii. Staff and public meetings (include anticipated number) iii. Plan research, drafting and revision (include anticipated number and any consulting staff review) iv. Production of final document(s) v. Any other anticipated budgetary needs including incidentals 171 Page All responses, questions and correspondence should be directed to the contact below. In the interest of fairness to all respondents, please do not contact other staff or elected or appointed officials unless instructed to do so. A list of questions and pertinent responses will be posted on the city's website. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Angela. schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us One electronic copy of the proposal, in Adobe PDF format, and ten (10) hard copies shall be submitted to the email and address above. XIII. REVIEW PROCESS & SCORING The RFP subcommittee will evaluate and rank all submitted proposals. After conclusion of this review, the subcommittee will recommend the most qualified consulting teams or firms to the City Council. The decision will not be made by ranking alone, but will be based on a combination including, but not limited to: ranking, presentation, proposal merit and other qualifications. The Council will review the recommendations and invite the top candidates to conduct a presentation before the Council, members of city staff and representatives of the Planning Commission. Presentations are expected to occur in April 2019. The City Council will make the final decision on the consultant firm selection, with input from the subcommittee, Planning Commission and staff. Once authorized to proceed, the "most qualified" consulting team or firm will be expected to immediately assist in developing a final scope of services and contractual agreement. Scoring criteria follows. 181 Page SCORING CRITERIA APPROACH Demonstration of an innovative and creative approach to scenario 10 points planning Clear process to identify preferred scenario and action statements 15 points to address these issues A strategy is devised to draft a community-based vision founded 10 points on developed consensus A comprehensive approach is taken that acknowledges the 10 points interconnectedness and complexity of issues Design and language techniques will be engaged to make the 10 points plans accessible, easy to read, and easy to use Understanding of comprehensive planning requirements and 20 points detailed plan approach to completion A work plan is submitted that is realistic based on the level of the 15 points scope provided and identifies high-level goals, strategies and timeline COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Community engagement plan includes multiple engagement 15 points techniques Specific tactics proposed to target high priority populations and 15 points create an inclusive planning process Clear definition in roles of staff and consultant in the engagement 10 points process Planning process is designed with transparency of decision 10 points making and implementation strategies in mind A process is identified to regularly update the community on 10 points progress made towards implementation of the plan BUDGET Proposed budget is reasonable and reflective of project needs 15 points Language is included stating the budget is "not to exceed" 5 points EXPERIENCE Project team has experience creating innovative, strategic and 10 points inter -related comprehensive plans Project team has experience creating action -oriented, phased 10 points implementation plans Project team has the comprehensive skills, capacity and 5 points technological resources needed to complete the project At least three references are provided 5 points TOTAL 200 Points 191 Page XIV. SUPPORTING REFERENCES & RESOURCES 1. www.ci.monticello.mn.us 2. 2008 Comprehensive Plan, includiRV all Appendices 3. Citv of Monticello Strategic Plan 4. Natural Resource Inventory & Assessment 5. Monticello Orderly Annexation Agreement 6. Interchange Planning Study 7. Highway 25 Coalition Study Materials 8. Coalition of Utility Cities 2019 Economic Impact Study for Minnesota Host Communities 9. 2017 Monticello Housing Study 10. Area Comprehensive Plans — Wright County, Becker, Big Lake Resource Partners Monticello Independent School District 882 Monticello Township Wright County Live Wright — Wright County Statewide Health Improvement Program CentraCare Health - Monticello Wright County Community Action Central Minnesota Initiative Foundation XV. GUIDANCE REFERENCES City of Shakopee — Envision Shakopee, Comprehensive Plan City of Minnetonka — Imagine Minnetonka The Futurist.com 201 Page City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 4A. Consideration to approve a request for Conditional Use Permit for a 92 unit Multi-familv/Assisted Living Facility in the R-4 (Medium -High Densitv Residence) District. Applicant: Monticello Senior Housing Owner, LLC — Michael Hoagberg (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square Address: Unassigned Planning Case Number: 2019-010 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: Conditional Use Permit to allow an assisted living facility in an R-4 zoning district May 31, 2019, extended to July 30th, 2019 Places to Live R-4, Medium -High Density Residential District The purpose of the "R-4" Medium -High Density Residential District is to provide for medium to high density housing in multiple family structures of 13 or more units per building, and at densities of between 10 and 25 units per acre. Wild and Scenic Recreational River District Vacant North: Single Family Residential / Places to Live (R-1) South: Commercial and Vacant / Places to Shop (B-2/13-4) East: Institutional (Church) and Single Family Residential / Places for Community and Places to Live (R -A/R -2) West: Commercial and Vacant / Places to Shop (B-4) Project Description: Headwaters Development is requesting approval of a 125 -unit senior living facility to be constructed upon a 5 -acre site located south of County Road 39 (Riverview Drive) and east of Hart Boulevard. The senior living facility is to be developed in two phases, with the initial phase being comprised of 92 units. In the initial phase, 78 units are to be devoted to assisted living while 14 units are to be devoted to City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 memory care. The building is to measure three stories in height. ANALYSIS Conditional Use Permit Evaluation Criteria. Assisted living facilities are listed as a conditional use in the R-4 District. Therefore, such uses are subject to conditional use permit processing. This allows for detailed review of the proposed development to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses, promote high-quality development, and provides the City with the authority to impose conditions so that the public health, safety and welfare is not detrimentally impacted by the development. Earlier this year, the City approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject site, changing from Places to Work (Commercial) to Places to Live (Residential). As a companion action, the City approved a rezoning of the site from B-4, Regional Business to R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District. The City Council, in its resolution rezoning the property, made note of the intent for residential uses on this property to occur without the need for departures from the zoning ordinance regulations, and a definite preference for senior housing, rather than general market multi -family, based on the location and proximity to other land uses in the area, and the low -impact aspects of senior housing on traffic, parking, lot coverage, and several other land use elements. According to Section 2.4.D.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, recommendations and decisions on conditional use permit requests must be based on a certain set of criteria. The following is a listing of each criterion followed by a Staff response: (i) The conditional use will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity of the subject property, Staff Response. The subject property has been vacant for a substantial amount of time. Considering that R-4 District performance standards (applicable to "assisted living facilities") are intended to ensure a high-quality development product, the proposed use is not expected to diminish area property values. (ii) The conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working near the use, Staff Response. The proposed use is not expected to be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or welfare of persons working or residing near the subject site. (iii) The conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property for permitted uses predominant in the area; Staff Response. The subject site is bordered on the north by single family residential uses, on the south by a commercial use and vacant, commercially - 2 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 zoned parcel, on the east by an institutional use (church) and single-family residential uses, and on the south by a commercial use and a vacant, commercially -zoned parcel. The design of the senior living project, including building placement, site access locations and landscape buffering efforts have been situated such that impacts upon nearby residential uses will be minimal. (iv) The conditional use will not pose an undue burden on public utilities or roads, and adequate sanitary facilities are provided; Staff Response. Utilities are presently available to the subject site. The proposed development is not expected to overburden the City's public service capacity. A traffic study for the proposed use and site was completed by the developer and evaluated with the prior Comprehensive Plan amendment and Rezoning request. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on the road system. (v) The conditional use can provide adequate parking and loading spaces, and all storage on the site can be done in conformance with City Code requirements; Staff Response. According to the Table 4-7 of the Zoning Ordinance, which establishes off-street parking supply requirements for various uses, "senior housing" must provide one off-street parking space for each unit. Thus, a total of 125 off-street parking spaces are required for the senior living facility at full project build -out. For the first phase, a minimum of 92 off-street parking stalls are required. According to the submitted site plan, a total of 111 off-street parking spaces are proposed as part of the first phase of the project. Of these stalls, 61 are to be surface stalls (including 3 ADA stalls) and 50 are to be underground stalls (including 2 ADA stalls). Thus, the parking supply for Phase 1 of the project exceeds the minimum parking supply requirements of the Ordinance. It is unclear if additional off-street parking is planned as part of Phase 2 of the project. A summary of required and proposed parking is provided below: Proposed Ratio Proposed Spaces Required Units Spaces Phase 4 92 1 space 111 (61 surface stalls and 92 per unit 50 underground stalls) Phase 2 33 1 space None or information not 14* per unit specified Total 125 111 125 Supply deficiency addressed via excess Phase 1 supply 3 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 As a condition of conditional use permit approval, it is recommended that the site plan be modified to demonstrate that a total of 125 off-street parking stalls can be provided upon the subject site. A loading space is proposed on the west side of the building. (vi) The conditional use will not result in any nuisance including but not limited to odor, noise, or sight pollution; Staff Response. The proposed use is not anticipated to create any odor or noise nuisance conditions. Appropriately, the site plan demonstrates compliance with the required 60 -foot green space setback from the County Road 39 (Riverview Drive) right-of-way which is intended to mitigate potential visual impact issues. Further, a clear open space setback of 40 feet has been proposed along all other property lines, and includes appropriate landscaping meeting the City's buffering and landscaping requirements. With the preceding in mind, the proposed use is not expected to have any nuisance -related impacts. (vii) The conditional use will not unnecessarily impact natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, and shorelines; and all erosion will be properly controlled, Staff Response. The subject site does not have any wetlands or shorelands. Submitted erosion control and site landscape plans include measures to reduce erosion during and after construction. A total of 12 deciduous "non -specimen" trees presently exist upon the site. While all existing trees are to be removed to accommodate the senior living facility, the amount of new vegetation provided on the site (as depicted on the landscape plan) will significantly exceed that which is to be removed. (viii) The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined in Chapter 5 for the proposed use. Staff Response. As a condition of project approval, all use standards identified within the City's Zoning Ordinance must be satisfied unless otherwise granted via variance. These items are discussed in the analysis to follow. SITE ANALYSIS Lot Size. Within R-4 zoning districts, a minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet is required. At 5.02 acres (218,666 square feet) in size, the subject property meets this requirement. Access. The subject site is to be accessed from the west via two 24 -foot wide driveways along Hart Boulevard. Such driveways align with access points which presently exist to the west side of the site and have been found to be acceptable by the City Engineer. Site access -related issues should be subject to further comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. C! City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 Phasing. The 125 -unit senior living center is proposed to be constructed in two phases. The initial phase is comprised of 92 units, 78 units of which are to be devoted to assisted living. The remaining 14 units are to be devoted to first floor memory care. The Phase 2 expansion is proposed on the south side of the building and is intended to provide 33 additional units. While a building footprint of 8,700 square feet in specified, it is unclear if a multi -story addition with underground parking is planned. Recognizing that Phase 2 of the senior living project appears to be conceptual at this point, it is recommended that such future phase be subject to conditional use permit amendment processing. Density. The R-4 District is intended to accommodate multiple family residential structures having 13 or more units per building and development densities of 10-25 dwelling units per acre. The proposed senior living facility calls for 125 dwelling units within a single stricture (Phases 1 and 2) and exhibits a density of 25 units per acre. Thus, the density requirements of the Ordinance have been satisfied. Setbacks. As shown below, the proposed development meets applicable R-4 District setback requirements. Required Setback Proposed Setback Front Yard 100 feet 115 feet (north) Side Yards 30 feet (interior) 58 feet (east) 40 feet (corner) 60 feet (west) Rear Yard 40 feet NA Clear open Space from ROW 60 feet 60 feet Clear Open Space from 40 feet (no more 40 feet Property Line than 50% of yard facing a street covered with parking/drive aisles Open Space. Within R-4 zoning districts, 500 square feet of common open space must be provided per dwelling unit. Thus, not less than 62,500 square feet of green space must be provided upon the subject property. In satisfaction of this requirement, 128,361 square feet of green space is proposed (58 percent of the total site area). In addition, not less than 30 percent of the area of sites which are devoted to assisted living facilities must be devoted to open space. According to the applicants, 2.94 acres (or 58 percent) of the 5.02 -acre site is to be devoted to pervious surface area. In this regard, the minimum open space requirement has been significantly exceeded. Further, the applicant's plans detail the continuation of sidewalk along Hart boulevard, and the installation of paved pathway along CSAH 39 in accordance with the City's Pathway Connections Guide Plan. Off -Street Parking. As noted earlier in this report, the off-street parking supply requirements of the Ordinance have been satisfied for the first phase of the project. 5 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 Further, all off-street parking stall and drive aisle dimensions have been found to meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the Ordinance. Staff does recommend however, that the site plan be modified to illustrate a total of 125 off-street parking stalls upon the subject site to accommodate Phase 2 development. This will result in 14 additional parking spaces upon the site. It should be noted that the ordinance grants the Community Development Department the ability to modify the applicable parking requirements if appropriate evidence exists to justify a departure from the listed standards. The Ordinance states that a maximum of 1.1 spaces per dwelling unit may be uncovered. Considering that only one parking space per unit is required for assisted living facility uses by ordinance, this standard does not directly apply. The site plan illustrates 61 uncovered (surface stalls) and 50 covered (underground stalls) and therefore meets the requirement, regardless. Drop-off/Pick-up Activities. Drop-off and pick-up activities are proposed to take place on the north side of the building beneath a canopy feature. While the inclusion of the canopy is considered a positive, concern exists related to possible vehicle congestion which could take place in the area. The drive lane beneath the canopy measures 24 feet in width. To ensure that drop-off and pick-up activities will not disrupt two-way traffic circulation, consideration should be given to providing an additional drop-off/pick-up lane beneath the proposed entrance canopy (within which senior transit vans, for example, may park for the boarding and unloading of senior passengers). Off -Street Loading. According to Section 5.2(D)(2) of the Ordinance, assisted living facilities must provide one off-street loading space. As illustrated on the submitted site plan, a loading area is proposed on the west side of the building. Such loading area measures approximately 60 feet in depth and illustrates ample turning radii (30 feet) for delivery vehicle backing maneuvers. Landscaping. An extensive number of plantings have been proposed upon the site, including plantings along the perimeter of the site, within off-street parking areas and around the perimeter of the building. The following is a generalized summary of proposed plantings (see landscape plan for specific plant varieties): PLANT TYPE QUANTITY Coniferous Trees 24 Ornamental Trees 90 Overstory Trees 34 Coniferous Shrubs 308 Deciduous Shrubs 307 Perennials 62 Ground Covers 337 In regard to site landscaping, the following comments are offered. no City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 Caliper Inch Requirements. According to the Ordinance, two average caliper inches (ACI) of landscaping must be provided for each 2,500 square feet of open (green) space upon the subject site. In this regard, 50 ACI is required upon the site (62,500 sf green space / 2,500 sf). The applicants have proposed a total ACA of 393 inches. Thus, the total ACI requirement has been satisfied. Perimeter Plantings. The Ordinance also requires 4 shrubs per 10 feet of building perimeter length. Phase 1 of the project has a building perimeter length of 1,152 feet (does not include 60 linear feet to be a shared wall with the Phase 2 expansion). Phase 2 of the project has a perimeter length of 320 feet. For Phase 1, a total of 231 perimeter shrubs are required. In satisfaction of this requirement, 232 perimeter shrubs (evergreen and deciduous) have been proposed. The landscape plan does not illustrate any plantings around the perimeter of the Phase 2 expansion. In the opinion of Staff, such detail can be addressed as part of future conditional use permit amendment processing (associated with Phase 2 development). Parking Islands. According to the Ordinance, there may be no more than 12 off- street parking spaces between parking islands. Further, each island must have one tree and 25 percent coverage by shrubs. This requirement has been satisfied. Perimeter Vehicle Use Area. According to the Ordinance, where a vehicular use area abuts a street right-of-way, perimeter landscaping strips must be provided and maintained between the vehicle use area and the abutting right-of-way or property line. This planting strip must at least 6 feet wide and include at least 8 ACI of canopy trees per 100 linear feet of landscaping strip. This requirement (along Hart Boulevard) has been satisfied. Courtvard Areas. The site plan identifies a courtyard area on the east side of the building. Appropriately, a significant amount of landscaping has been provided in such area. Ground Cover. The bulk of the site will be sodded or seeded with lawn grass (a bluegrass mix). As a condition of conditional use permit approval, the subject site should be irrigated. It is noted that there are existing trees on the site which the City Engineer has been recommended for removal due to vehicle site line considerations. The new plantings will comply with sight line recommendations. In addition, the City Engineer has made a recommendation regarding the location of plantings near the southeast corner of the site; the applicant will be required to adjust the location of the plantings but within the same area. Buffer Yards. The City's Zoning Ordinance provides for a specific buffer yard treatment that identifies separation and plantings dependent on the potential for conflicts with adjoining land uses. For the proposed use, the "basic buffer" 7 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 requirements (labeled an "A" buffer in the landscaping section of the zoning ordinance) apply to the north and east property lines. For "basic buffers", the required planting area must be 20 feet in width and must provide 2 average caliper inches (ACI) of canopy trees, 10 ACI of understory trees, plus 15 small shrubs per 100 linear feet. The site's northern boundary measures 510 feet in length while the eastern boundary measures 669 feet in length. As a result, the following plantings are required in the north and east buffer yards: North Buffer Yard East Buffer Yard (510 feet) (669 feet) Canopy Trees 11 ACI 14 ACI Understory Trees 52 ACI 67 ACI Shrubs 77 101 The submitted landscaping plan meets this preceding buffer yard landscaping requirements. Building Finish Materials. Building elevations have been submitted which illustrate fagade designs and intended building colors, including exterior finish materials. In regard to exterior finish materials, the Zoning Ordinance provides that: ". . . districts with multiple family housing shall be subject to building material standards as follows: all building walls facing a public street shall be covered with stone, brick, cultured masonry simulating brick or stone, or other enhanced materials acceptable to the City Council to an extent not less than 20% of the exposed wall silhouette area. In addition, multiple family structures of thirteen (13) or more units shall, when lap horizontal siding, be constructed of heavy gauge steel or cement -board, with no use of vinyl or aluminum permitted. Natural wood or species that is resistant to decay may be permitted where approved by the City Council. The plans illustrate the use of brick wainscot around much of the building, and brick finish facing on the exposed wall that provides access to the underground garage. Cultured stone is applied to the full first floor height along the corner of the building surrounding the primary entrance areas, as well as to canopy post bases. The remainder of the siding is cement board in a variety of finishes — lapped siding and panels. The plans appear to meet the requirements listed above. Staff would encourage the addition of more brick or stone on architectural features such as the deck/porch extensions, however, this comment is included as a consideration for the applicant's option, rather than added as a condition. Building Height. The R-4 District does not specifically limit height. The proposed height of the three-story building is 35 feet as measured from the top of the parapet. In previous review, the City has actively sought the opinion of the Department of Natural Resources regarding building height on this property. Under the (revised) Wild and Scenic Recreational River overlay district, the building height would be limited to 25 feet. However, DNR staff indicate that due to the history of the City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 property's annexation and platting, the previous 35 foot height allowance would be applicable. As such, the proposed height meets the requirements without need for variance. As a condition of conditional use permit approval, the Fire Marshal should provide comment and recommendation regarding fire protection issues/requirements for the building. Trash/Recycling. As a condition of site plan approval, the applicants should provide details including elevation drawings and materials details related to waste storage and removal. A trash -handling location is identified as a part of the service/loading area on the west side of the building. Lighting. To date, an exterior lighting plan has not been received. As a condition of conditional use permit approval, a photometric lighting plan should be submitted subject to City review and approval. Such lighting plan should specify exterior lighting locations, styles, mounting and light distribution. According to the Ordinance, the height of outdoor lighting, whether mounted on poles or walls or by other means, must not exceed 25 feet in height. Further, the maximum allowed illumination level for residential uses, as measured at the property line is 0.5 foot-candles. Signage. A freestanding monument sign plan in included on the building elevation sheet (Sheet A203). Its intended location is to be the front lawn of the site, behind the building setback lines. In this regard, it is recommended that the site plan (Sheet C400) be modified to specify the proposed monument sign location. The submitted building perspective and elevations illustrate a conceptual wall sign location on the north fagade of the building. No size details have however, been provided. As a condition of conditional use permit approval, all signs erected upon the subject site must meet applicable Sign Ordinance requirements and be subject to sign permit. Unit Areas. Appropriately, detailed floor plans have been submitted which specify unit sizes. According to the Zoning Ordinance, efficiency units within assisted living facilities must have a minimum floor area of 440 square feet and must not exceed 20 percent of the number of apartments in the building. The Ordinance further states that one -bedroom units within assisted living facilities must have a minimum floor area of 520 square feet. Just 24 of the proposed first - phase units are below the 520 square foot threshold, 14 of which are memory care units, rather than assisted living units. As such, 10 of the 78 assisted living units (12.8%) are below that threshold, consistent with the maximum requirement of 20 percent. Units within the senior living facility should conform with applicable minimum floor area requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code. This issue is subject to further review and recommendation by the City Building Official. E City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 Grading, Drainage and Utilities. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities should be subject to review comment by the City Engineer. The City Engineering Department has provided a comment letter relating to the site and utility plans. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing on the request on June 4th, 2019. The Planning Commission confirmed that the upcoming improvements, paired with the proposed tree removal and the grading on site would support an improved visibility condition at Hart and CSAH 39. It was also noted that a transportation study was completed by the applicant with the Comprehensive Plan amendment application, which demonstrated that the volume of traffic for the proposed use is significantly lower than that of a commercial use for the site. Commission asked that engineering staff review whether any turn lane configuration into the Kwik Trip or this facility would be necessary. It was noted that the engineers have reviewed the traffic study and the access configuration and have not recommended any turn lanes. It was also noted that a pathway along CSAH 39 and sidewalk along Hart is being installed with the project to provide pedestrian access. The Commission inquired as to the ponding for the site. It was noted by the applicant's engineer that the on-site stormwater design will provide infiltration and will reduce the flow of entering the regional pond to the east. The Commission also inquired as to the height requirement in the Mississippi Wild Scenic and Recreational River District. Steve Grittman confirmed that as the parcel was platted and zoned under the prior MWSRR rules setting the height at 35', the project meets the required height limit for the MWSRR. The Commissioners also briefly discussed the brick and stone treatment on the building, with planning staff noting that the building meets the 20% requirement with a significant amount of window coverage. During the public hearing, a resident inquired as to past project approvals for the site. It was noted that no project had been previously approved for the site, either commercial or residential. However, the City Council's decision to approve the rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment request by the current applicant has allowed the CUP application to move forward for consideration. No other public addressed the Commission on the item. Following the discussion and hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit unanimously. Conditional Use Permit Site Improvement Performance Agreement A conditional use permit and site improvement contract for the development has been prepared and is attached for Council review and approval. As the subject site is a platted parcel, the agreement is not a standard development contract, but rather a site improvement agreement which specifies the conditions of the approval and required site improvements. 10 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 Similar to development agreements, the site agreement does require payment of development related charges, including trunk area charges. The agreement further specifies the required securities for the public improvements within the plat (pathway and sidewalk), as well as landscaping and grading and restoration of the plat site. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommends approval of the request, Alternative 1 below. Motion to approve the conditional use permit and site improvement agreement to allow an assisted living facility an R-4 District based on findings in Resolution PC 2019-013. 2. Motion to deny the conditional use permit to allow an assisted living facility in an R-4 District. Findings for denial should added as a part of this motion. 3. Motion to table action on the requested conditional use permit to allow an assisted living facility in an R-4 District pending additional information as identified by the City Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The R-4 District makes a specific allowance for assisted living facilities as a conditional use. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z and based on the findings in the accompanying resolutions. As noted in the report, the proposed project is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning as recently adopted by the City Council. Although there are conditions included in staff's recommendation, those conditions are considered minor adjustments to meet the technical requirements of the ordinance, rather than significant land use issues. The major concerns, including use, building height, density, traffic generation, and visibility at the intersection of County 39 and Hart Boulevard have been addressed as a part of the project design. It should be noted that the City's standard of review on Conditional Use Permit requests is based in the presumption that the use is allowed, subject to the ability of the applicant to meet the conditions identified for the use in the ordinance, and other reasonable conditions based on the location and setting. As noted, staff believes that this threshold has been met, subject to compliance with the terms identified in Exhibit Z. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2019-013 B. Subject Property Aerial Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Site Development Plans E. Building Floor Plans F. Exterior Elevations 11 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 G. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 30th, 2019 H. Wright County CSAH 39 Improvement Information I. Conditional Use Permit and Site Improvement Performance Agreement J. Finance Plan Z. Conditions of Approval 12 City Council Agenda: 06/24/2019 EXHIBIT Z Monticello Senior Living Facility Conditional Use Permit Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square 1. The site plan shall be modified to demonstrate that a total of 125 off-street parking stalls can be provided upon the subject site, subject to review for modification of requirements at the time of the second phase. 2. Phase 2 of the senior living facility shall be subject to conditional use permit amendment processing. 3. All landscape areas upon the subject site shall be irrigated. 4. Building finish materials are found to be consistent with Ordinance requirements. 5. The Fire Marshal provide comment and recommendation regarding fire protection issues/requirements for the building. 6. The applicants shall provide details related to waste storage and removal activities. 7. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted subject to City review and approval. 8. The submitted site plan shall be modified to illustrate the proposed monument sign location. 9. All signs erected upon the subject site shall meet applicable Sign Ordinance requirements and be subject to sign permit. 10. Units within the senior living facility shall conform with applicable minimum floor area requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code. This issue shall be subject to further comment and recommendation by the City Building Official. 11. Compliance with the comments of the City Engineer's review letter, dated May 30th, 2019. 12. To ensure that drop -off -pick and up activities will not disrupt two-way traffic circulation, consideration be given to providing a designated (separate) drop-off/pick- up lane beneath the proposed entrance canopy. 13. The developer shall execute the required project development agreement, stormwater maintenance agreement and encroachment agreement. 13 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-013 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A SENIOR -ORIENTED MULTIPLE FAMILY BUILDING CONSISTING OF 92 ASSISTED AND MEMORY -CARE UNITS IN THE R-4, MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct a 92 -unit senior housing project on a platted parcel in the R-4 District; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned R-4, Medium -High Density Residential with a designation upon its rezoning for senior -oriented housing, and subject to the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River Overlay District; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Places to Live" for the site; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting compliance with the terms of the applicable zoning regulations related to land use, building height, parking supply, traffic generation, landscaping, building materials, and other project elements; and WHEREAS, the uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the R-4 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the uses will not create any unanticipated changes to the demand for public services on or around the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4t", 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the R-4, Medium -High Density Residential Zoning District. 2. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, serving as a transitional development between lower density residential and commercial areas. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the land use plan and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-013 4. The proposed senior housing project meets the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, pursuant to the conditions attached to the Conditional Use Permit, and listed below. 5. Parking, landscaping, building materials, and other project elements are found to be adequate based on the proposed improvements to the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit for Office use, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. The site plan shall be modified to demonstrate that a total of 125 off-street parking stalls can be provided upon the subject site, subject to review for modification of requirements at the time of the second phase. 2. Phase 2 of the senior living facility shall be subject to conditional use permit amendment processing. 3. All landscape areas upon the subject site shall be irrigated. 4. Building finish materials are found to be consistent with Ordinance requirements. 5. The Fire Marshal provide comment and recommendation regarding fire protection issues/requirements for the building. 6. The applicants shall provide details related to waste storage and removal activities. 7. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted subject to City review and approval. 8. The submitted site plan shall be modified to illustrate the proposed monument sign location. 9. All signs erected upon the subject site shall meet applicable Sign Ordinance requirements and be subject to sign permit. 10. Units within the senior living facility shall conform with applicable minimum floor area requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code. This issue shall be subject to further comment and recommendation by the City Building Official. 11. Compliance with the comments of the City Engineer's review letter, dated May 30, 2019. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-013 12. To ensure that drop -off -pick and up activities will not disrupt two-way traffic circulation, consideration be given to providing a designated (separate) drop-off/pick- up lane beneath the proposed entrance canopy. 13. The developer shall execute the required project development agreement, stormwater maintenance agreement and encroachment agreement. ADOPTED this 0 day of June, 2019 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION ty Development Director 3 Monticello Senior Housing Owner, LLC - Michael Hoagberg I Request for Conditional Use Permit Lot 1, Block 2 Riverview Square I PID#155-117-002010 Created by: City of Monticello Headwaters Develovment - Monticello Senior Livinu CUP Narrative 1 April 2019 From: Headwaters Development #1 The following describes the overall project summary. The Proiect: The proposed senior living development will be managed by Ebenezer and will have 92 units in the first phase with an additional 33 units planned for the second phase. The total units of assisted living, independent living, and memory care suites will total 125 units. This would consist of approximately 14 memory care units on the first level and a blend of 78 varying levels of assisted living units on the first, second, and third levels. The rent structure is comparable to neighboring facilities and other new campuses that are currently being constructed across the region. The building will incorporate typical senior building amenities such as dining rooms, family dining room, multi-purpose rooms, chapel, beauty shop, activity rooms, theater room, medical clinic space, therapy, library, fitness room, spa room, pantry, management office and commercial kitchen. It will also have underground parking. This community doubles as the resident's homes as well as a community full of activity and care provided by our operator. The operations of the building will be 24/7, although the majority of activity occurs during the The exterior of the three-story building will incorporate brick, stone and Hardi-type siding (cementitious siding) with a sloping asphalt shingle roof. The building will be set back off of the two adjacent streets with extensive landscaping, patios, gardens, walks and courtyards. The Management Team - Ebenezer Senior Services: Founded in 1917 by Minneapolis Lutherans to provide community -centered care for homeless older adults and others in need, Ebenezer Senior Services programs and services today include: • Independent Living (including condominiums, cooperatives and senior apartments) • Assisted Living • Memory Care • Transitional and Long-term Care • Adult and Intergenerational Day Programs • Community-based Services • Management and Consulting Services • The Ebenezer Foundation Part of Fairview Health Services since 1995, their combined resources and expertise offer access to a full range of choices for vibrant senior living. In partnership with the University of Minnesota, they are also part of an academic health system improving the patient's clinical experience, conducting nation -leading research and achieving academic prominence. Ebenezer will assist in analyzing the market, establishing a strategic marketing plan, producing sales collateral, coordinating a public relations plan, and training sales staff. Through Ebenezer's system for managing leads, maximizing sales, and monitoring programs to reach occupancy projections, the new development hopes to exceed projected occupancy. Ebenezer will provide effective on-site management as well as consulting services in all areas of management. Ebenezer has proven that quality patient care and a positive bottom line can go hand- in-hand. Ebenezer will also continue to assist Headwaters Development in evaluating the facilities' strengths and weaknesses. In doing so, they will assess current programs, any service gaps, as well as opportunities and threats in the external market environment. From this, recommendations for new service options tailored to the needs of seniors will be developed and include an individualized implementation plan. #2 CUP Criteria: (i) We expect a building and use like what is being proposed is advantageous to a community in many ways. We anticipate, given the quality of building and operations that will go on this site, values in surrounding properties at worst will stay neutral, and likely will increase. (ii) The senior community in no way will be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or welfare of persons near the site, in fact, these factors will likely improve in the persons impacted by this site. (iii) The conditional use will in no way impede the normal or orderly development of surrounding property. (iv) The proposed senior community will have minimal impact on the site and use of public utilities or roads. The seniors will not use the roadways or utilities at peak times and the overall usage is considerably lower than any other alternate use for this site. (v) Sufficient on grade and below grad parking will be provided at the site. All loading spaces and storage are adequately hiding from primary public view and will be incorporated into the overall structure. (vi) Great attention to detail has been made to make sure the building is aesthetically appealing to the general public. Landscape will be eloquently groomed and maintained for the public and the residents. Furthermore, most activity is ceased by 530/630pm in the community, limiting noise and any congestion concerns. (vii) The proposed use has coordinated in depth with civil engineers and architects to ensure minimal impact to the existing site, proper erosion / water control and limited to no erosion concerns. (viii) The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined by City governing documents. Employee counts: The anticipated number of employees for the proposed Senior Living project will be approximately 50 employees (including full and part time positions). This will include an executive director, a clinical services director, mix of RN's and/or LPN's, nursing assistants, and staff for activities, marketing, dietary, housekeeping, maintenance and other administration. M C� C) 0 N 0 .Q LL] U-1 W ry U-1 0 U 0 U) r - co n 0 U 0 0) c J 0 Z 0 U C O a� U 0 N Q W r) J U Y PROJECT TEAM: ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Klomlev)))Horn PREPARED BY: ALAN L. CATCHPOOL , PE 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W, SUITE 238 N ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTACT: RYAN HYLLESTAD, PLA GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 TELEPHONE: (952) 995-2000 FAX: (952) 995-2020 CONTACT: JAKE A. WOTCZAK, PE SURVEYOR CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6750 STILLWATER BLVD. N., SUITE #1 STILLWATER, MN 55082 TELEPHONE: (615) 275-8969 FAX: (615) 275-8976 CONTACT: DANIEL THURMES SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR MONTICELLO SENIOR LIVING SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 121 N, RANGE 25W OWNER/DEVELOPER MONTICELLO SENIOR HOUSING OWNER,LLC 17550 HEMLOCK AVENUE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TELEPHONE: (952) 378-4386 CONTACT: MICHAEL HOAGBERG GENERAL CONTRACTOR ENGELSMA CONSTRUCTION, INC. 7119 31 ST AVENUE N. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TELEPHONE: (763) 536-9200 CONTACT. BRIAN TEETERS ARCHITECT AYRES ASSOCIATES MONTICELLO, COUNTY, MN NORTH N.T.S. 215 NORTH SECOND STREET, SUITE 204 NOTES: RIVER FALLS, WI 54022 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TELEPHONE: (715) 831-7550 2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A Previous paper CONTACT: DANIEL BURNAM size (34.00 x 22.00 Inches) SHEET. 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. } m W Q 0 U) Z O Ln W O Z Z O J Z< W W U m O N O rn U W � Z <0 o Z Q low Z cn � w J W O= Sheet List Table W O a Sheet Number Sheet Titleco Q C000 COVER SHEET o � N w V100 ALTA NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY Z C100 GENERAL NOTES 0 LO N C200 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN C201 DEMO PLAN C300 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 0 Z J oW 0 C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 <Z0<1 CWO C302 SWPPP z a' `L < - w° ° o C400 SITE PLAN =a Q o L o Z C500 GRADING PLAN ~ " Q a ° z J Q W W W W Q J J C501 STORM SEWER PLAN =~ K�U2 J ~ U> -LL O J ° Q CD Q N C600 UTILITY PLAN H Z -1 ZW LLJ Q o a M Q Z � w p C700 CIVIL DETAILS > U O m�DQWco 5 K� z z ° O w C701 CIVIL DETAILS W W < Z U) 2~ W 2F 0 C702 CIVIL DETAILS o o o Q C703 CIVIL DETAILS w n L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN O N a o U<)} a m m L101 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT Y J Z Uj Z Q w L102 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE Q F0 L103 LANDSCAPE DETAILS LU W Z Cl) O 1-- W U LU 0 U Z O U 0� Z O LL OZ O Z U) J — W o LU J a W Q V— OC a u H a Q W Z— Waco 0 a �o W �C aJ • 0 O J W LL U_ Z Know what's beIow. W O Call before you dig. (j)SHEET NUMBER C0 C000 M M M O O O N O Q O I— I a) CO n 0 U U) 0 M J O C O U) z O 7 U O a� U O U U w 0 J UI H 0 z ati P I +I p o��O \ p 925 U d N 35 934 9,93 pgL �93o 929 928 _9 �� ati y ---SET 1/2" IRON PIP ----936 + 932 93 Qty' c0 �Z z w e y � 9,98 atiy y° a SET 12" +ti a y EXISTING PIPE MA KED -- 4 q3 v H_ _ _ + \ / 9 + +ati 11 #15233 LEANING SE) �4g4/ +� ` 92 �� RIM=928.1 \I m �kp F = 6 HART BLVD RIVERVI ( 9 9 y 927 o EXISTING BUILDING �`I 6 �6 O -- /n x`71 o IRON PIPE o� _ T 8 Q _ z )NN ti =hN a O. 1 0•��0 \1��94 3 9 + 2EEL/ 929 y I a N 6+ It 92 / 945 4 ` INV=915.5(E) \ y 1 �j� 9w i6 L_ a�N II II IInj II II � F 6 3 0 �` Q �> / 9g ° o ` a w = \ o a� iA to 9 q 933 X934 _ _ i ° ~ - z a 9 n oc N q4 4'\�a� of of MONTICELLO MN g S00°441\47'W, 6 8.9 c �+ Q��• \_ " + , /� P \\ 0�, �t =m63.1, i m FORCEM V s I / F C AI V \ } z a� � P \ y o. ,o'hL \ANDON?) 1 5 I —--Ff•�� °� FM � d F, +d� � 4� - - I � � M FM F FM FM F FM FM y q a _•..,..�---��— M v Q F > _ / F.L / / / M / . F ,_ I — 948 w 1 FM _ FM J M ad` MH -, o,'h b \ p �`-�- 932 _��--.--- 0 ° L + \ + L- 3 U TY EASEMENT y +P I QE +Z< « a?q« +� << < w < « � 947 -Ow - iir + <� 1 1 � RI 39.4 I 933 - '� �13U--"-. _�_-.--..... 6� O hl \ I + 946—x_ -c -q2 1 PER C. 3 tF43_ LQ q3 36 RCP a OJ +! 945 aw a� 93 PVC P A w �<-------------------- �132� <2 ---1'r 4 o a� 10" PV (PLA / < n - < < -' _i--- �� a 9 g3sg \�- » 35 No q k \ I k g 1-t A3 C>,° + °p sr 938 5? �\�93 � I - R..,aN��922.4 E 9285 PC �o ' �o a �I CONTACT- 9 9 �, N�q EDGE OF q +a o » . RG \\�\ 6 0 () ( L I g2 ' u ❑ ° S - >> I INV=q -PLA + + n o[ I D qO 1 1 2 g7 / 1 5 I z 3 937 �. a� I =923.64(5- ) ^ I — + any ALAN CATCHPOOL + > — a — R -g42.s ky 9sg -- - ---- - -- —---------------- -- -- 7o KIMLEY HORN I ------ % L / ��\ INV= I�—+° —�— --- --- ----- p-------gy�bn�93 _ ----- a w 2Ow — — — — — — — — — — / o� v CL --CB o + SUMAC a ° \ EDGE OF - University 5 �/ m �� � su \))/ � '� � � Suite 23gN Avenue W. p RIM=940.0 a� �d 941 INV=UNK/FABRIC 940 a a3\ St. Paul Minnesota 55114 (IN = 5 PLAN) 5 2 2 , 'q 0 P a ° // (RIM=939.37 p + pa y a� a a a Tel: 651-393-6164 p' p \6 ak + + a'a 4? �� ws Email: catchpool@ 01 / +Q °°� °� ° 941 N`� rn9°h / CB + C �AN. MH -- / — INV=FABRIC/FILLED ) 6 O �� I<Imley-horn.COm PN . a p' + + +a°` a�Q3 �-- RIM=938.3 937.68 PLAN IRI =9329 MISSISSIPPI INV=918.6( E �\ L 930 / / INVH931056 (PLAN) // �0 COUNTY/CITY: DRIVE LL < z / (0 942 a / �`� (BITUMINOUS PUBLIC ROAD) I c �� y �Ny° aN�k porn °' aNp� oa°+a . + + + + + + + 1 5 +a° ' + �'� 6" SERV. C61 C, J 4?"(PLAN) y _00 2- R 1 A EV AND m U IL T S MENT 1 5 I I aN�� CTI I 9 uN�\ Pn`�' I i 6 >> 8" RCP ' ` aN�\ oNs' + 943 + �. s CO C \o » a °�� +I Papp F D 1/2" IRON PIPE /I -VAULT P�1 o ' - I C6\ , 6 LL I aN' +p +O MARK # 14345 ,� \\ Q s° / z II II + 1 � 14 \/ - aQ �Q / �czz I 6 - � , NORTH I 1 5 i + ��. RIM=941.7 �,�a + INV=938.2/ ,' OV J�� Q 30 60 I ' 49 ; 5 I oaf' \Y�e / + 6" SERV. / 1 �L� �O� M I o`� a°N (PLAN) / `� �` I\ 7�7� a �. + 4 Q Z Porn ' X I ( aNry^ aa�� �� •� 935 + + ��ti� '1 g' �� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 6 \ The following legal description is shown ber The First a W \ I sae +°k /1g3• 6 Q> American Title Insurance Company Title Commitment No. I I o r y O ��z U u \ a +� L / ° ;• \ NCS -921 340-MPLS, dated August 16, 2018 U _a \\\ 93 I � � Pkv' FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE � � � pg � 2� �p�l -7 � 6 as I I m Q ACa + MARKED #14345--'I \ REVISIONS: LLJ�g p\P Lot 1 ,Block 2, RIVER VIEW SQUARE, Wright County, >6 I v N �a. + 945 ^ pe D 157 6 Minnesota. Abstract Property.DATE REVISION 0", C, 6I + m�P +ANN. i ` a' \ PIG /6 ; co -,, I _ +�� P°°� u� / \� / • 09-07-2018 INITIAL ISSUE ° ` t° aNy�� �? TABLE A NOTES: ��� / The following exceptions appear on the First American Title as 6 / / / 6 Insurance Company Title Commitment No. NCS -921 340-MPLS, VAULT / A 6 7 / 6 / �� dated August 16, 2018 � \ 3 9 / / I I £ 1 +gky0 \ \\ A-7� / 10. Easement for highway purposes per Final Certificate Doc. LL y� aa�� 10 No. 227949, conveyed by Doc. No. 360234, and partially Q) I a� + �9 /�� p \ /\ M / vacated Doc. No. 491943. I I \ 1 1 . Easement for utility purposes, per Doc. No. 379143. (Shown 11 a� I qA6 Q�� RIM=945.4 ; / +aa -7 / graphically). I + \ + INV=942.3 12. Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 6, per EXISTING PARKING: m r / < 6 / / Document No. 436443. Partially conveyed to the City of ��. a N \ Monticello Doc. No. 467778. Partially vacated per Doc. No. 1 I \ I +Q FO D 1/2" IRON PIPE Q\, THERE ARE 0 VISIBLE PARKING STALLS DESIGNATED 91, �, MARK #14345' 1 / \i`' \u�'� / / ON THIS PARCEL. 467909. (Does not affect the subject parcel). �Q1_\�7-7 / 13. Easement for highway purposes er Final Certificate Doc. No. 0 002aN�� fid'----- / + 6 �L 484055, re-recorded per Doc. No. 651677. Partially vacated �, �a + / 6 Q3G LEGEND: BENCHMARKS 14 per Doc. No. 491943. (Does not affect subject parcel). PROJECT LOCATION: \1 ^ o ��\� �- / , 6 ,�� C"? 6 14. Developer's Agreement River View Square per Q ap �� �-Q \,C�P�51' �� ,/ ®/ QF> FOUND MONUMENT FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION 1S Doc. No. 681165. (Not shown affects entire parcel). ? SET 1 /2" IRON PIPE HYDRANT ELEVATIONS BASED ON INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON K Io, It � � JG �P� / � 1� 'I O MARKED RLS NO. 25718 � 15. Easements per plat of River View Square per Doc. No. \ a a \ \+ Q� / ) ,' Q�� ° ® CURB STOP THE MNDOT GEODETIC WEBSITE. SURVEY DISK BAUER 681 167. (Shown Graphically). \ �' iv CABLE N PEDESTAL + 9 \ as' / N "d' Q WATER WELL MNDOT AZ MK WITH AN ELEVATION OF 957.34 WAS G0 '' Ac AIR CONDITIONER 16. Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 55 per Doc. T \ w R \ ❑ Qw WATER MANHOLE USED TO ESTABLISH VERTICAL CONTROL FOR THIS H A R 1 B LV D OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WM WATER METER No. 951313. (Does not affect subject parcel). rna \ N0h QNO� �\fGGPGSj/ J�,, n�•//� r6 °'\ ® ELECTRIC METER pOSTINDICATORVALVE SURVEY (NAND 88) 1 7. Agreement per Doc. No. 1020863. (Does not affect subject q4 +Q + /\l JG��/ /G(� �_ Q� \ EP ELECTRIC PEDESTAL X WATER VALVE parcel.) PID#1 5 \ P\jO I `P /\/ Q.�''VV O' cam. \ \ er ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER j.' O BOLLARD 949 //3� J O # LIGHT POLE p FLAGPOLE SURVEY NOTES: CERTIFICATION: Nps E� GUY WIRE '( p, t0 MB MAIL BOX �\ + � POWER POLE ❑ TRAFFIC SIGN 94��9 GAS MANHOLE 1 . BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY To: MMC Land Holdings, First American Title Insurance -`` UNKNOWN MANHOLE 3 \ , F UNP I/2" IRON PIPE 9 15 / �` i�/ \ w `� ® GAS METER 0 THE WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE.BEARINGS Company and their successors and assigns: This is to \ Suite #1 y M RKED # 14345 -11 / pe / SOIL BORING p y g J O TELEPHONE MANHOLE 6750 Stillwater Blvd. N. �5 X 950.0 SPOT ELEVATION FROM THE PLAT HAVE BEEN ROTATED, BUT INTERIOR certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it ��Q,a• r / AA A( \�,0 6 ® TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANGLES HAVE BEEN MAINTAINED. is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Stillwater, MN 55082 05A \ � _ ttom�." �J� � �a SANITARY CLEANOUT Phone 651 .275.8969 `C" 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER GOPHER ONE Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for 6 �1. SANITARY MANHOLE LOCATES AND AS-BUILTS PLANS PROVIDED BY THE ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys, jointly established and CONIFEROUSTREE Fax 651 .275.8976 /`P\P 0 or 0) CATCH BASIN � CITY OF MONTICELLO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. adopted b ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, dan@ \ \ _ FESo944.8 K / 0orEl STORM DRAIN p y cssurvey ,\ \ �I \ x DECIDUOUS TREE 3. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, GAS, 4, 7(a), 7(b)(1), 7(c), 8, 9, 1 1 , 16, 1 7, 18, and 19 of o� ® FLARED END SECTION 1,0 LlCv / `� 9ga ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. net 13\0\� UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: STORM MANHOLE Table A thereof. The field work was completed on 9_0� / 9�� \\\ 16 `(r J `��J� ,�I \ \ P m ue UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC August 27, 2018. iii TABLE A NOTES: —UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE \ \ +�^ \\\` ° p 2 �P�p�l �1d LOCATEDTHE FROM FIELD UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN SURVEY INFORMATION AND ou OVERHEAD UTILITY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 4 UNDERGROUND GAS 16. THERE IS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH \ Dated: 9-07-2018 a°� 9 q EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO > SANITARY SEWER \ MOVING WORK/BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ON THE Revised: \ GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN >> STORM SEWER FOUND 1/2" , ° / COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN I WATERMAIN SUBJECT PROPERTY. IRON PIPE'ayo a ' :, SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES —, FENCE 1 7. NO PROPOSED CHANGES IN RIGHT OF WAY ARE KNOWN. BY CURBITYPICALI 18. NO MARKERS OF WETLANDS DELINEATED BY A QUALIFIED Daniel L. Thurmes coNrouRs SPECIALIST WERE OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF CORNERSTONE NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES — I23o — Minnesota License No. 2571 8 Py. _ \ SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED / r' ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK. ° LAND SURVEYING INC. / G ` \ The First American Title Insurance Company Title ACCURATELY POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION FLOOD INFORMATION: Commitment No. NCS-921340-MPLS, dated August 16, AVAILABLE. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! 2018 as listed on this survey was relied upon for THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FILE NAME SURVKH03 G LOCATE TICKET NUMBER(S) 1 821 1 261 1 . SOME MAPS WERE Gopher State One Call matters of record. Other easements may exist that PROJECT NO. KHl 8003 THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE C, AREAS OF MINIMAL \ \� RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND T V TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 were not shown in this commitment and are not shown C O U S OO TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 FLOODING AS SHOWN ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE on this survey. BOUNDARY/TOPOGRAPHIC \ THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH MAP NUMBER 270541 0005 B HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE SURVEY WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. OF NOV. 1, 1979. DRAWING IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND NOT TO SCALE } m w I- 0 CO z O W w 0 z U` z O J Z a LU U) Z U m 0 0 N w U Lu z Of< ❑ C o Z < H W Z W J w 0 }LU — < Y } ao � N U) LU > z C:) U') L0 N } LL O ❑ ❑W X Q �zQ X X <z0P w0i-nCl) o-E0w= Z IL > LL w0LL O ��ja0 Q z F~FLU 2J F a) Z J < W W W F- CO W 2 LE U 2 ��❑�� X 0, L� X X Ii W i=z ❑ C)f 0 ❑ z W X LU F Q Q U Z 2 W ~O X X W a Z z z O =2LULU < U)Fw� z o J ZXX U U) 0O X J X X X w o _ J LU 0 < < m o < � o m LU m w Y W z z Y U U 0 W � 2 Cn ❑ ❑ U W Z LLI J > zW O a =) 1 Cl) v Z W � J U) F J z J F_ O Q U L.L O z ILL Oz 0 Z Cl) J > 0 LU1 H LU D a LU G U LU LUV LU H0 z0 a�0 W 0 Z a LU 0 O J W LL F_ Q z L Z) U) SHEET NUMBER C/) V100 co M (n O rn O N C) .Q Q W Lu I- 0 J Lu Z W C7 N N U) c co D_ U c N 0 c� 0) c J O N Z 75O U c O a� U 0 N Q W r) J I H Y GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 3. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 8. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS -BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS -BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS -BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 11. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 13. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE ALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5" RAINFALL EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION. 1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 4. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 5. ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: - PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION, INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MN NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. 9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE. 13. ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITH SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICH THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR STORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 15. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT. 16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ENGINEERING DIVISION. 17. IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) OR MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATION. 17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF MONTICELLO AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25. ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR ASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING. 3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'D TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: - DENSITY TEST REPORTS - BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM - PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER - LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS - ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACK FILLING. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES. 11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18. ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW -GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21. A MINIMUM OF 5SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO. B1900672 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE S. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 DATED MARCH 8, 2019 c L i v Lo Lo z J z Q w � g z U � O N W w Q ~ o Z) z U) Q z LU O 3: = w wz Q Y } o U) N CY } m w Q D W z O w 0 z r W m U Lu Q J W 0) co Q Z Q ¢z0F F_ V move WW O w z a J I = Q U) Z O w O aQ m.W O = o z ��jm0 = F U)U ~0 Q z U J CoQ �aUzJ J L) Q W W W W J Q =KIrU= p H z LL OJ Q O W H z D 0 0 of o Ir 0 z O F Wp Q Q ~ o U z w z > O w�01QwCn Lu -zw ww�QC7z O ui Lu =umi2Hw (' 0 U z w 0 U O(n 0. O (n J 0 Q C) U) Z o w0 0 (14 C14 o Q a m m a a o o m o Y W Z C7 Z Y Oz 0 w Ir _ U)J Cq 0 0 U - > w O C/) W Lu F_ O Z z O_ J Q U LuL.L ~ z v! ^ z Lu O (' U 0. O Z LL Oz O z U)J 'j - > w O C/) W W J o Q � 2 owa W w H z- a >. Waco Q 0 a U) `Z a O O J J W LL U_ 0 ~ Z w SHEET NUMBER W C100 co co (n 0 rn O N O .Q O z J 0- z 0 W LLI 0 z Q ry 0 z w Z w w ry J a� a� U) r_ co a_ 0 0 c m r) 0) J O N z 0 U C O a� U 0 Q W 0 J I H Y I I I I I I I I I I , I I � ►� --- I I I I I I III I o,��C II II I II I II 1 Z MISSISSIPPI I 1 1 DRIVE�a 1 I - _ \\I � I I II I I I I II I I I I II I I I I I m II II II I I o I I li I I I z I I I I I I I C5 I I I I I u I II w I II I I I 7 I II I - p II I I II w I I I II i t I I I 5 I I 1 �1 4 I \ I 11 II �1 11 1 \I 1 \ 0 \ \ \\ z \ \ \\ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET \\ \ 20 40 80 \ r r PROTECT EXISTING TREES ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES (TYP.) G 0—ESC 0—ESC i 7 i B w\ /fS► A �f LEGEND PROPERTY LINE TREE TO REMAIN TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TREE PROTECTION FENCE TREE MITIGATION DATA NO SPECIMEN TREES PRESENT ON THIS SITE NON -SPECIMEN TREES SAVED: 0 CAL. IN. NON -SPECIMEN TREE REMOVAL: 94 CAL. IN. NON -SPECIMEN TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED: 0 CAL. IN. TREE PROTECTION NOTES 1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON. 2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE -LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY. 3. SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES. 4. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHIN DISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS. 5. TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. KEYNOTE LEGEND O EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) OB EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) OC LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) O TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL) REMOVED (TYP.) TAG # SPECIES CAL. IN. MULTI -STEM STATUS 1 DECIDUOUS 6 NO REMOVED 2 DECIDUOUS 6 NO REMOVED 3 DECIDUOUS 6 NO REMOVED 4 DECIDUOUS 6 NO REMOVED 5 DECIDUOUS 6 NO REMOVED 6 DECIDUOUS 8* NO REMOVED 7 DECIDUOUS 5 YES REMOVED 8 DECIDUOUS 15 NO REMOVED 9 DECIDUOUS 8* NO REMOVED 10 DECIDUOUS 6 NO REMOVED 11 DECIDUOUS 12* NO REMOVED 12 DECIDUOUS 10* NO REMOVED * DENOTES CANOPY TREES GREATER THAN 7 CALIPER INCHES THAT COUNT TOWARD TREE PRESERVATION z CREDIT NOTE: A SPECIMEN TREE IS DEFINED AS ANY CANOPY TREE WITH A DBH OF 36 INCHES OR MORE AND ANY UNDERSTORY OR ORNAMENTAL a TREE WITH A DBH OF 10 INCHES OR MORE O� /---- DRIP LINE U FURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIPLINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE. PLACE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 20' INTERVALS. TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION FENCE PLACEMENT 1 SCALE: N.T.S. C200 �- Z m L ooac �azc Q z o ` w � � W � z a 5' _ <cnQ�0� (f) =F(n�W� _ QawL 2 W �_ UwL ~ (if J F �o��� �o LU LU <z�< co < c w—r—c W co Q z U co o '124 U) w Q ~ o � z U) Q Z U) W O 3: = w Q Y } c C) v) o w m w Q 0 W z O w 0 z W N 00 J a O Lu z F z U W J J x Q z o Q N � o 0 SHEET NUMBER C/) C200 W W W Q Z W J) H J Lu D z oO = _ Lu Sow0 a C) _ U) Q a m m a Y o W o m z (O o z Y 0 0 0 F F_ Z O z LV < i z — F_ Z W J c)?aWa cn ~ W z ' z a O� U L.I_ O z LL I— Oz O z (D � J Lu — w o J a C/) W Q V OC a W — C� w H z- 0 a Lu 0 u) 0 a U) `Z o O J W LL U_ 0 w z Z 2 SHEET NUMBER C/) C200 cv M 0 rn 0 N 0 a- 0) iii z Q n 75 W N a) IZ- co n 0 U a� W 0 0 M 0) C J O c (3) U) z O 7 U c O W a) .00 U O cn W u7 W J UI Y UUN I KAU I UK 6HALL F'KU I LU I IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITY PEDESTALS. I I \ I / I x FL 0-ELC 0-ELC S00.444T`5 68.87 '� _ _ - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I"� I I I I I I I I I I I I ----r-- f-r-----� "-I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I' I I 1 1 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 1- I I I' I rvvvI 1 1 1 1 1 1 �I I I I I I I I I I I I I G I __II__� I I I I I ,� I I I I z 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I � I 'II�� 14 I I� I I I T I I/ IIII I I I I III I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I" I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 13 T. L�TI �Y E�S ME TI I I I I I I I I I I O �h �F I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ;1 fE l0 CI Nod 7�14� I I I I I I I ��al 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ( I I I I I I I I I B I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _I- I - a ' T_--1---4 —4 -- -- - I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I �__I-�-r� - --r-r Q 1-7--I- r T 1 I I ----I--�- -+- --- -- -- -rt- 7 I r r T ?J7,171-1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I � -I 17-1 7 I I I I I I I I I IJ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 14111111111111 11111111�1i1 1 ��� I I I I I I I I 1111111 61111111111111111111111 1111 I I II 1�111111111111111111111111111111111�111111111 VARIABLE- Row ARIABLE -__- L 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Row G 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ip 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �I I I I I� T1T1T1 T I I I �I �I_1- A—� I I I -1-1 11 I I I CONTRACTOR SHALL 1 I I I i 1 j i i TITI�I� I� 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 11/1 11 I 1 11/1 1 I I RIM-9la .01 I I I PROTECT IN PLACE I I I I IINU Iv�/FIAQ ICI I I I I I I I EXISTING 10 IN PVC I (93 .�' LAN RI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f' I I I I I I I I SANITARY SEWER. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - / I 1111II,,��I I�`�I1111`1I11 �I'`1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 1111111/111 I 11 1�11111111111�11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IlH 11111111111111111111111 1111111 11 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I/I I B 1111,1'�1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111��1 1 1 1 1 �1 1 // �'��1 I �I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I/W"'tib 1 1 1 1 1 �\ w �I, . 6 � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I s� qua I I I // /� \/ / \ iO � II`I�I Ij IUll1LITyI(�AsdMNlfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII�Il �I1 //� / \ /� / \ II I Z \ I I I I I IIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1�/ISI l // /// / I I � 11�1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1�1111111�1 III \ � /% � I 11111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII%IIIIIIIIIIIIIi�IIA � %// � I 1 1 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I // I I I d l l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I/I I I I 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I IIII / 01 I I I L.IJ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1�1�111111111111111 L1T11 I I I � I II I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ISI I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I p l l l l l� l l l l j l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I I I I I I I I 11�1� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'I I I I I I I I I fi F / \ � \ I II IIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lel I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I� ��/ 7�� // \ I II IIIIIII I 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 II1111111111y1� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7 CONTRACTOR SHALL I I I I I I I I I I V I I II I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I k 1 1 1 1 1 1 X I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I COORDINATE PRIVATE UTILITY I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RELOCATION OF FIBER AND I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 /I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VAULT. I I I I I� � 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I f // \ I I I IIIIIII 1 1 1 1 1 1111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �I 1 1 1 1 1 11j� 1 1 III\IIIIIIIIIIII \IIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I,I' � F�" // D ��/ �,� \\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ III\IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII\1111111111111f�1111111111�1 O � \ \ I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 CONTRACTOR SHALL \ I IEI P COORDINATE PRIVATE UTILITY A \\ \ I I I\;�4"�j11 I I I LOCATION OF FIBER AND \ I I I I I I I VAULT. I I I I I--% I I I I I �� E F CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT IN I I\� I I I 1 ��-►%�� / P` III / PLACE EXISTING PRIVATE ELECTRIC POLES. THE CONTRACT SHALL COORDINATE GUY WIRE RELOCATION. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING 8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY AND MN/DOT. SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT 11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW -CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AND/OR THE CITY. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA 5. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR 13. REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK. 14. ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES. 6. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED15. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK. 16. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER 7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. KEYNOTE LEGEND OA REMOVE EXISTING CURB O PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE, REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR ADJUSTED RIM HEIGHTS OC REMOVE EXISTING FLARED END SECTION OD REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANT OE REMOVE EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND VALVE OF FULL DEPTH SAWCUT OG REMOVE EXISTING RCP STORM LINES OH REMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES OI REMOVE EXISTING TREE, REFERENCE C200 FOR FURTHER DETAIL LEGEND I �kx����CXX�X�II 11111111111111 X X X X X X X -® ® ® ® ®- 0-ELC x x x n n D I GAS TEL CTV } m PROPERTY LINE LLI Q REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE CLEARING & GRUBBING OFFSITE CLEARING & GRUBBING FULL DEPTH SAWCUT Z W z REMOVE TREE J O z a 0 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER > W O REMOVE UTILITY LINES FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION W EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE Q EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J -BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL U o EXISTING SANITARY SEWER z EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE O Lo Z cn J Z — m W EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE D a Lu C G ULu♦� = v EXISTING CONTOURO H z 0 a W Q 0- O Z Q EXISTING CURB & GUTTER - a a NORTH O (n J EXISTING SIGN IL W U_ EXISTING FLARED END SECTION U0 O GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET L1j O N w U EXISTING STORM MANHOLE cn Lu EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN SHEET NUMBER � � Ofz O C201 0 EXISTING GAS METER Q w EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE (E wLu LLj g EXISTING WELL O 3: Z O= Y EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER Z) EXISTING ROOF DRAIN _j LU EXISTING GATE VALVE �-�, Q EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER Nj WI EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER Z EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER O EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE N EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE m W ❑ ❑ � O Of Q z Q EXISTING TREE O o C/) W- W z d - W = J EXISTING TREE LINE U W D I~i O o �<jao = z ~ W 2 J Q a U z J Q U aWLou ww FU = rn 0 :3I- z 1 O u0 W �z�❑ '0 o a 0 z W F w Q D Q o �Uz�wO wl�oazz Lu Lij z �U))2�w� o z J 0 U) U) H O 0 0 Q w o _ wU) 0 o Q Q m Q C0 0 oW m w Y W z � z � Y U U) ❑ ❑ U Z J z a O O U W Q U) z O U L.L z O LL Oz O cn J Z — m W 1 F_w D a Lu C G ULu♦� = v Lu H z 0 a W Q 0- O Z a a NORTH O (n J LL W U_ H z GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET L1j 0 0 20 40 80 U) SHEET NUMBER C/) C201 co Ch O O O N O Q z J 0- 2 W ry W A N N L C co n U W N M / I) C J O c O 07 z O m U c O a� .00 U O W cn W J UI H Y n IN 0-ELC 0-ELC 0-_ ELCl� \ \ - — — ---r---r—\---� I� \ \ �� '3F _ — -- � D it I --- _ --—---------- 4-----------��--------- —�� O I I -- _ ------------ I I I V I-tl I I I o _ --- A — /- — — I I 1\ I / I 7 / r j/ \ A B A rn -- — 1 \ \ n — IIII \ �� / _ �1 o -- \ \ \ I I � � I I II l l� \ —\ —_\ \ __ r , I/I � -----J ✓r \ I 1 / lI l , l A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 11 �' A \ \ \ \ (:l3776\ \rri i I� \Iz \// / I \II III �. I \ I ►\�1 \ II III I \ \ \ ��-- \a I I0\ \N'f j IIII � � I I I\ I I N I \ ^III A I i� / \ \ �`\ \ oloo � p / �,!� \ \IIII 406 I \ I \ // c I I \ I�\\ I A I �\ C, ?/ \ / �` p/ / ��� ' /QC, \ \ \ \A\ 111 \\101 Ile �" \ \ \� ice' A\ // /' \ \ j KEYNOTE LEGEND SITE DATA OA CHECK DAM LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (ACRES) ±5.41 OE ROCK ENTRANCE LEGEND TOTAL SITE AREA (ACRES) ±5.02 OB TEMPORARY DIVERSION 406 SILT FENCE — PRE -DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) ±5.41 DORSET -TWO INLETS COMPLEX, PRE -DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) ±0.00 OC SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN j H aQWSo POST DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) ±3.06 POST DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) ±2.35 OD INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 2 J OE ROCK ENTRANCE LEGEND LIMITS OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT K/XJ �1 ROCK ENTRANCE > > INLET PROTECTION 406 SILT FENCE — LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LIMITS OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT K/XJ �1 CHECK DAM > > TEMPORARY DIVERSION 406 DORSET SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 Qzo� PERCENT SLOPES 13776 DORSET -TWO INLETS COMPLEX, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 4. WITHIN ONE WEEK (7 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS. 2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE WASHOUT PIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE. 3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS. 5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS GRADING. ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 6. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 7. TEMPORARILY SEED WITH PURE LIVE SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE OR AS REQUIRED BY NPDES AND/OR CITY OF MONTICELLO GRADING PERMIT. SWPPP UPDATES AND AMENDMENTS THE GC MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE JOBSITE BINDER AND SITE MAPS, TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SITE. UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK PROGRESS WHEN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES OCCUR: BMP INSTALLATION, MODIFICATION OR REMOVAL, CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (E.G., PAVING, STORM SEWER INSTALLATION, FOOTING INSTALLATION, ETC.), CLEARING, GRUBBING OR GRADING, OR TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION. IMPORTANT: THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) TO THE ENGINEER AND OBTAIN WRITTEN ENGINEER APPROVAL BEFORE DOING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. MODIFYING EROSION OR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS (SUBSTITUTIONS ARE TYPICALLY ONLY APPROVED IF SPECIFIED MATERIALS ARE NOT AVAILABLE OR THERE IS A VALID REASON THE SPECIFIED BMP WILL NOT WORK) 2. ADDING/DELETING EROSION OR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS; 3. MODIFYING THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE; OR 4. PERFORMING ANY ACTIONS OR IN ANY MANNER THAT IS CONTRARY TO THE SWPPP. THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY OR ADD ADDITIONAL BMPS, WITHOUT ENGINEER APPROVAL, IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION TO PREVENT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE OR PROTECT WATER QUALITY; HOWEVER, GC MUST NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AS SOON AS PRACTICAL AS TO THEIR ACTIONS TO DISCUSS THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL OR SUPPLEMENTAL MEASURES AND TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED APPROVALS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMIT AND PROTECTION OF DOWNSTREAM WATER QUALITY. AMENDING THE SWPPP DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT HAS TO BE REPRINTED. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO ADD ADDENDA, SKETCHES, NEW SECTIONS, DETAILS, AND/OR REVISED DRAWINGS THAT HAVE THE ENGINEER NAME IN PRINT, ARE STAMPED, SIGNED, DATED, AND ARE ACCOMPANIED BY WRITTEN COPY OF THE ASSOCIATED RFI AND ITS RESPONSE FROM ENGINEER. ENGINEERED ITEMS MUST BE SIGNED AND STAMPED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 I � } m w Q 0 cn z 0 w 0 z z O J z a ZLu U) p N w U Lu OfZ ❑ c O z z< W wJ � Lu O w O } Z LU — Q Y } Of N Of Lu ■ �� D L0 N N LL m o ❑ ❑ J w LuQzQ Qzo� w ocf) C/) ��cow z d LL j H aQWSo O o 0 = z �3jao ~ Co LOU 2 J Q 0 O z J Q O Fawwww = O= p ::i F-- z LL O Q O w �z �❑ afO�❑z o wFwQ�Q �Uz<w0 o Lu 0-1 z ww =2=wz 2 U)i 0 z U) U) J H oO ❑ ❑ Q w o _ w 0 O Q Q m QC o m ww m w Y w z z Y O U) ❑ ❑ O I Z Z �. < azJ� zLu a W O ZJ U)O� 1--_ OQ c) cl) �Owa W ci) Z U) z W O O V U Z O LL F___ Oz O Z (D cn J K m W ' O Lu F_ Lu D V0 QwL) 0' HD 0 Lu z Lu O Z a Lu Qo O J W LL U_ 0 z Z Lu SHEET NUMBER U) U) C300 _z co ch O O 0 N O Q Z J 0 - CN 0- W ry W U co 0 U U) 0 M 0) ,_ J 0 c O U) Z O m U c O a� .00 U O cn W J UI H Y i / / / / n _927— t7 / 7 i i i i KEYNOTE LEGEND OA CHECK DAM OB SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN OC INLET PROTECTION DEVICE OD ROCK ENTRANCE II II I ui n I� SITE DATA LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (ACRES) TOTAL SITE AREA (ACRES) PRE -DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) PRE -DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) POST DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) POST DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) ±5.41 ±5.02 ±5.41 ±0.00 ±3.06 ±2.35 R. LEGEND w Q ROCK ENTRANCE �OOOOO� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET — — — — — ® I I I I I i / / / / n _927— t7 / 7 i i i i KEYNOTE LEGEND OA CHECK DAM OB SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN OC INLET PROTECTION DEVICE OD ROCK ENTRANCE II II I ui n I� SITE DATA LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (ACRES) TOTAL SITE AREA (ACRES) PRE -DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) PRE -DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) POST DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) POST DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) ±5.41 ±5.02 ±5.41 ±0.00 ±3.06 ±2.35 R. LEGEND w Q ROCK ENTRANCE �OOOOO� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET — — — — — ® INLET PROTECTION CO SILT FENCE z 0 0 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE j w INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. x x SAFETY FENCE z BIOROLL RIP RAP O z EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. um z 2 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. O Z a 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. LU 4. WITHIN ONE WEEK (7 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE U) STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR U 0 O MATERIALS. 0 z 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ^ 0 w O= ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. z CD Q (.0 w 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING ( w bi g THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE O 3: z Y CONSTRUCTION. >}z m § 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE J j CONTRACTOR. Y Q 0 } 8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. N U) Lu 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO > EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS ■ z NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. o LoLo 10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER N FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: } U- 0 UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, ❑ ❑ w LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL a z a STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE < z O P THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR 'L'uf Fn c w THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. U)O LL O o a Q w Of 0 a z BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: _ � w r z J �Ou)¢ Q U 1. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL Q a w W w of J BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE. F = Of> 2. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, UNDERGROUND SYSTEM, } < oN CURBS AND GUTTERS. I ­_Oz D o Q o 3. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS ofOof❑zw F w Q - Q o EACH INLET STRUCTURE IS INSTALLED. U z2 w O Q 4. PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO m w U) w z FINAL GRADE. W W O Q E5 z F \ 5. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. _ Lu m z z o 6. PAVE SITE AND INSTALL STRIPING. 7. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES FOR PAVED AREAS AS WORK z CD U J PROGRESSES. oO p p Q 8. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION OVER ALLLu U = AREAS. o w 9. OBTAIN CONCURRENCE WITH THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT THAT THE 0 N H C, Q } SITE HAS BEEN FULLY STABILIZED THEN: o o m 1. REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION ADN SEDIMENT CONTROL Q o z DEVICES Y _j wLu 2 z 3:v 2. STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL OF BMPS. U) ❑ ❑ U GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET !0 20 40 80 I Z Z Q Q Z JN z Z W a W O J Cn — O � �- OQ c) t/)13W �Ow�a pC ci) Z U) W O O V U z O LL F_ Oz O J Z K m W O Lu F_ Lu D V� QAC) H 0 a Q Lu z Lu O Z a Lu Qo O J W LL U_ 0 ~ Z w Z) SHEET NUMBER U) U) C301 0 co L0 ch O rn O N r O �L Q W W M U N N G7 co CL U W N 0 M 0) c .2: J 0 c O 07 Z O 7 U c O O So U O cn W cn W 0 J UI Y DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PROJECT INFORMATION: PROJECT LOCATION: SEC OF HART BLVD AND CR 39 MONTICELLO COUNTY, MN MPCA ADDRESS: MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT PROGRAM 520 LAFAYETTE ROAD NORTH ST. PAUL, MN 55155-4194 PHONE: (800) 443-4729 WATER MANAGEMENT: THE CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT STREET #1 MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PHONE: (763) 295-2711 GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION: GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW WAS DONE BY BRAUN INTERTEC. THE REPORT INDICATE 6 -INCHES TO 3 -FEET OF PREDOMINANTLY CLAYEY SAND OR SANDY LEAN CLAY TOPSOIL OVER VARIABLE DEPTHS OF SAND FILL, EXTENDING FROM 4 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE. NATIVE SOILS CONSISTED PRIMARILY OF SAND, AND SILTY SAND DEPOSITS. MEASURABLE AMOUNTS OF GROUNDWATER WERE ENCOUNTERED IN 5 OF THE 12 BORINGS, BETWEEN ELEVATIONS 916.5 AND 918.5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTING AN APPROXIMATELY 32,350 SF BUILDING WITH ACCOMPANYING PAVING, UTILITIES, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAS, AND LANDSCAPING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE C PER FEMA FIRM MAP NUMBER: 270541 0005 B HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOV 1, 1979. THE PROJECT SITE DOES NOT INCLUDE SITES OF HISTORIC OR ARCHEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND DOES NOT INCLUDE ENDANGERED & THREATENED SPECIES, RARE NATURAL COMMUNITIES, COLONIAL WATERBIRD NESTING SITES, MIGRATORY WATERFOWL CONCENTRATION AREAS, DEER WINTERING AREAS OR WILDLIFE CORRIDORS. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WILL DEFINE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE AND THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TO OCCUR; INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING THE CONSTRUCTION; DESCRIBE THE PRACTICES THAT WILL BE USED TO CONTROL EROSION AND THE RELEASE OF POLLUTANTS IN THE STORMWATER, INDICATE A SCHEDULE TO HELP ENSURE THAT THE PRACTICE INDICATED ARE IMPLEMENTED AND TO HELP EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PRACTICES IN REDUCING EROSION AND POLLUTANTS DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE; AND TO DESCRIBE THE FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURES REQUIRED TO HELP MINIMIZE EROSION AND OTHER STORMWATER IMPACTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: PROJECT TYPE: THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SITE APPURTENANCES. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTION OF A ±32,250 SF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING, ASSOCIATED GRADING, BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE SURFACES, UTILITY SERVICES AND A STORMWATER SYSTEM TO MANAGE RUNOFF FROM THE SITE. RECEIVING WATERS: THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE GENERALLY DRAINS NORTH AND EAST TO AN EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH IN THE CR -39 RIGHT-OF-WAY BEFORE BEING COLLECTED INTO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STORM SEWER SYSTEM AND ULTIMATELY DISCHARGING INTO THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER APPROXIMATELY 0.1 MILES OF THE SITE. CALCAREOUS FENS: THIS PROJECT DOES NOT DRAIN TO ANY KNOW CALCAREOUS FENS. SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATERS: THE SITE DISCHARGES TO, AND IS WITHIN ONE MILE OF, A SEGMENT OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER THAT IS CLASSIFIED AS A SCENIC OR RECREATIONAL RIVER SEGMENT AND RESTRICTED WATER AS DESCRIBED IN THE GENERAL PERMIT. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES: THE PROJECT INCLUDES THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 92 -UNIT ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE FACILITY THAT COMPRISES A 41,000 SF BUILDING FOOTPRINT THE PROPOSED WORK WILL ALSO CONSIST OF GRADING, BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE SURFACES, UTILITIES AND LANDSCAPING. THE TOTAL DISTURBED AREA IS 4.80 ACRES. THE PROJECT ADDS 2.35 ACRES OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TO THE EXISTING GREENFIELD SITE. SEQUENCE OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVIES: PHASE 1: 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER INLETS. 2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, CONCRETE WASHOUT PIT AND INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROL (SAFTEY FENCE, SILT SOCK, AND SILT FENCE). 3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS 4. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING STORAGE AREA. 5. COMPLETE REMOVALS AS INDICATED IN PLANS. 6. PERFORM MASS GRADING. ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 7. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 8. IMMEDIATELY STABILIZE ANY EXPOSED SOIL AREAS AND COMPLETE STABILIZATION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF CEASING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. PHASE 2: 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTUTES AS EACH INLET STRUCTURE IS INSTALLED. 2. INSTALL APPROPRIATE BMP INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AS WORK PROGRESSES. INSTALL ALL OTHER TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS. 3. COMPLETE GTRADING AND ISTALLATION OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION OVERALL AREAS DISTURBED. 4. STABILIZE AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMP'S. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND DETAIL SHEETS: SHEET C300 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PHASE I PLAN SHEET C301 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PHASE II PLAN SHEET C302 - SWPPP SHEET C303 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: ALAN L. CATCHPOOL 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 SWPPP DESIGNER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: DAIN S. SYNHORST, E.I. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 643-0439 ARCHITECT AYRES ASSOCIATES 215 NORTH SECOND STREET, SUITE 204 RIVER FALLS, WI 54022 TELEPHONE: (715) 831-7550 CONTACT: DANIEL BURNAM GENERAL CONTRACTOR ENGELSMA CONSTRUCTION, INC. 7119 31 ST AVENUE N. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TELEPHONE: (763) 536-9200 CONTACT: BRIAN TEETERS ECS: TBD OWNER/DEVELOPER MONTICELLO SENIOR HOUSING OWNER,LLC 17550 HEMLOCK AVENUE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TELEPHONE: (952) 378-4386 CONTACT: MICHAEL HOAGBERG TIMING OF CONTOL MEASURES THE FOLLOWING CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE COORDINATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: 1. STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE THE FIRST ITEM CONSTRUCTED AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PERMANENT STABILIZATION HAS TAKEN PLACE. 2. SILT FENCE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO ANY SOIL DISTURBANCE AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PERMANENT STABILIZATION HAS TAKEN PLACE. 3. STRUCTURAL BMPS, SUCH AS DIVERSIONS, AND SEDIMENT TRAPS OR BASINS, SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO MAJOR SOIL DISTURBANCE; 4. CLEARING, GRADING AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL WILL NOT OCCUR IN AN AREA UNTIL IT IS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED; EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH FECER, STAT AND LOCAL REGULATIONS THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN REFLECTS MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY GUIDELINES FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION RECORDS THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PRACTICES TO MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS. 1. PERMITTEES MUST IMMEDIATELY INITIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS AND COMPLETE STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 2. ALL CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE EACH WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A STORM EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER IN 24 HOURS. THE INSPECTION WILL BE COMPLETED BY THE EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR. 3. ALL MEASURES WILL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD WORKING ORDER; IF A REPAIR IS NECESSARY, IT WILL BE INITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REPORT 4. BIO ROLLS WILL BE INSPECTED FOR DEPTH OF SEDIMENT, TEARS, TO SEE IF THE FABRIC IS SECURELY ATTACHED TO THE CONCRETE BARRIERS. 5. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BE INSPECTED FOR DEPTH OF SEDIMENT AND FREE OF ANY TEARS. DEVICES SHALL BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THEY ARE SECURELY IN PLACE. 6. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR DEPTH OF SEDIMENT, TEARS, FABRIC ATTACHMENT TO POSTS, AND THAT POSTS AND FABRIC BOTTOM ARE FIRMLY IN THE GROUND. 7. BUILT UP SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SILT FENCE WHEN IT HAS REACHED ONE THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. SPILL PREVENTION GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: THE FOLLOWING GOOD HOUSEKEEPING PRACTICES WILL BE FOLLOWED ONSITE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. 1. DESIGNATE AREAS FOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR, TAKING STEPS TO MINIMIZE SPILLS AND CONTROL THE RUNOFF FROM THESE AREAS; 2. PROVIDE WASTE RECEPTACLES AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS. THE RECEPTACLES SHOULD BE COVERED AND THE WASTE SHOULD BE REGULARLY COLLECTED; 3. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE CONTROL OF EQUIPMENT WASH WATERS, SUCH AS CONCRETE WASHOUTS, TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED DRY WEATHER DISCHARGES AND AVOID MIXING THE WASH WATER WITH STORM WATER; 4. PROVIDE PROTECTED STORAGE AREAS FOR CHEMICALS, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, FERTILIZERS, GASOLINE, AND OTHER POTENTIALLY TOXIC MATERIALS. THESE AREAS SHOULD PROVIDE CONTAINMENT TO PREVENT STORM WATER FROM ENTERING THE CHEMICAL STORAGE AREA AND PREVENT LEAKS FROM LEAVING THE CHEMICAL STORAGE AREA; AND 5. PROVIDE ADEQUATELY MAINTAINED SANITARY FACILITIES. HAZARDOUS PRODUCTS: THESE PRACTICES ARE USED TO REDUCE THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. 1. PRODUCTS WILL BE KEPT IN THEIR ORIGINAL CONTAINERS UNLESS IT CANNOT BE RESEALED. 2. ORIGINAL LABELS AND MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS WILL BE RETAINED ON SITE AND ACCESSIBLE AT ALL TIMES; THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT PRODUCT AND SAFETY INFORMATION. 3. IF SURPLUS PRODUCT MUST BE DISPOSED OF, MANUFACTURERS' OR LOCAL AND STATE RECOMMENDED METHODS FOR PROPER DISPOSAL WILL BE FOLLOWED. SPILL CONTROL PRACTICES: IN ADDITION TO THE GOOD HOUSEKEEPING AND MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES DISCUSSED IN THE PREVIOUS SECTIONS OF THIS PLAN, THE FOLLOWING PRACTICES WILL BE FOLLOWED FOR SPILL PREVENTION AND CLEANUP: 1. MANUFACTURERS' RECOMMENDED METHODS FOR SPILL CLEANUP WILL BE CLEARLY POSTED AND SITE PERSONNEL WILL BE MADE AWARE OF THE PROCEDURES AND THE LOCATION OF THE INFORMATION AND CLEANUP SUPPLIES. 2. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR SPILL CLEANUP WILL BE KEPT IN A MATERIAL STORAGE AREA LOCATED ONSITE. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO BROOMS, DUST PANS, MOPS, RAGS, GLOVES, GOGGLES, CAT LITTER, SAND, SAWDUST, AND PLASTIC AND METAL TRASH CONTAINERS SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS PURPOSE. 3. ALL SPILLS WILL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AFTER DISCOVERY. 4. THE SPILL AREA WILL BE KEPT WELL VENTILATED AND PERSONNEL WILL WEAR APPROPRIATE PROTECTIVE CLOTHING TO PREVENT INJURY FROM CONTACT WITH A HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE. 5. SPILLS OF TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL WILL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY, REGARDLESS OF THE SIZE. IN ADDITION TO REPORTING TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES, REPORT SPILLS TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (STATE DUTY OFFICER: 800-422-0798 OR 651-297-8610). ANY SPILLS ABOVE THE REPORTABLE QUANTITIES LIMITS IN THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR), TITLE 40, PART 302 SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE EPA NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER (800-424-8802). THE REPORT WILL INCLUDE MEASURES TO PREVENT SPILLS FROM REOCCURRING AND INFORMATION REGARDING HOW TO REMEDIATE SPILLS IF A SIMILAR OCCURRENCE HAPPENS. A DESCRIPTION OF THE SPILL, WHAT CAUSED IT, AND THE CLEANUP MEASURES WILL ALSO BE INCLUDED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR'S EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR SHALL BE THE SPILL PREVENTION AND CLEANUP COORDINATOR. 7. SPILLS WILL BE STUDIED TO UNDERSTAND WHY THEY OCCURRED AND PREVENTIVE METHODS WILL BE CREATED TO ENSURE SIMILAR SPILLS DO NOT OCCUR IN THE FUTURE. PRODUCT SPECIFIC PRACTICES PETROLEUM PRODUCTS: ALL ON SITE VEHICLES WILL BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND RECEIVE REGULAR PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TO REDUCE THE CHANCE OF LEAKAGE. PETROLEUM PRODUCTS WILL BE STORED IN TIGHTLY SEALED CONTAINERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY LABELED. ANY ASPHALT BASED MATERIALS USED ON SITE WILL BE APPLIED AND STORED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. ANY SPILLED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OF 5 GALLONS OR MORE SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY AT 651-297-8610. PAINTS AND CLEANING SOLVENTS: ALL CONTAINERS WILL BE TIGHTLY SEALED AND STORED WHEN NOT REQUIRED FOR USE. EXCESS PAINT AND SOLUTIONS WILL NOT BE DISCHARGED TO THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM BUT WILL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS OR STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. CONCRETE AND CONCRETE TRUCKS: CONCRETE, CONCRETE TOOLS AND TRUCKS ALL MUST WASH OUT IN A DESIGNATED AREA. THE DESIGNATED AREA MUST BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE AND COMMUNICATED TO ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE AS THE WASHOUT AREA. THIS DESIGNATED AREA MUST MEET THE MPCA AND EPA REGULATIONS OF A DEFINED CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. THE FOLLOWING THREE OPTIONS ARE CONSIDERED AN APPROVED METHOD: 1. KEEPING ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SELF-CONTAINED AND RETURNED TO AN INDUSTRIAL SITE TO BE DISPOSED OF IN A MPCA APPROVED MANNER. 2. PROVIDING A PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASHOUT CONTAINER THAT ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT CAN BE COLLECTED IN. THESE CONTAINERS SHOULD BE MAINTAINED ON A REGULAR BASIS. 3. CREATING A SELF -INSTALLED WASHOUT FACILITY WITH AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. AN ENGINEERED CLAY LINER WILL BE CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CONCRETE WASHOUT REGULATIONS, PLEASE SEE THE MPCA'S MEMORANDUM "CONCRETE WASHOUT GUIDANCE" AND THE EPA "STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES CONCRETE WASHOUT". VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING: IF VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT ARE WASHED ON THE PROJECT SITE IT MUST BE DONE INA DESIGNATED AREA. THE DESIGNATED AREA MUST BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE AND COMMUNICATED TO ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED. RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA MUST BE CONTAINED IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILAR CONTROL METHOD AND MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART 5.20 AND 21.2 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION UNDER THE NPDES, THE PREPARER OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS TRAINDER UNDER THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, INSTRUCTOR JOHN CHAPMAN, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM. MR. DAIN SYNYHORST'S CERTIFICATION IN DESIGN OF SWPPP IS VALID THROUGH NOVEMBER 27, 2022. NSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE w EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR (MNDOT 2573): Q THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSIGN AN EROSION CONRTOL FOR THE PROJECT WHO SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMLIANCE WITH THE PROJECT SWPPP. THE D EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR (ECS) SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST CURRENT ADDITION OF THE MNDOT STANDRD SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR ALL APPLICABLE SECTION. THE ECS SHALL: 1. IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP PLAN. 2. OVERSEE MAINTENANCE PRACTICES IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP. 3. CONDUCT OR PROVIDE FOR INSPECTION AND MONITORING ACTIVITIES 4. INSPECT SITE AND BEGIN CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO DEFICIENT BMP'S NO LATER THAN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT. 5. PREPARE WEEKLY SCHEDULE OF EROSION ACTIVITIES (MNDOT 1717.2D) 6. PREPARE AND UPDATE THE CONTRACTORS EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE PLAN AS NECESSARY (MNDOT1717.2E) W 7. IDENTIFY OTHER POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES AND MAKE SURE REMEDIES ARE ADDED TO THE SWPPP z 8. IDENTIFY ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE SWPPP AND IDENTIFY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) TO ADDRESS THE DEFICIENCIES AND ASSURE THEY ARE 0 ADDED TO THE SWPPP. 9. IF CHANGES IN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP, THEN THE ECS SHALL AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE THE CHANGES. I j CONTRACTOR'S EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE PLAN: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A CONTRACTOR'S EROSION / SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE PLAN TO THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE FIRST PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING. THE CONTRACTOR'S EROSION / SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE: 1. THE NAME OF THE CONTRACTOR'S DESIGNATED EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR WITH 24-HOUR CONTACT INFORMATION. (I.E. PHONE NUMBER, EMAIL, ETC.) 2. NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR THE INDIVIDUAL(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING AND MAINTAINING THE SITE INSPECTION LOGS ON A WEEKLY BASIS (OR WITHIN 24 HOURS OF 0.5 INCHES OF A RAIN IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD). 3. NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION. 4. NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL(S) WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EMERGENCY REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENTS. 5. LOCATION WHERE THE SWPPP DOCUMENT AND NPDES PERMIT WILL BE KEPT ON-SITE. THE DOCUMENT SHOULD BE ACCESSIBLE AT ALL TIMES AND o AVAILABLE IN THE TIME OF ESSENCE. Z 6. WHERE AND HOW CONCRETE WASHOUT WILL OCCUR AND BE IN COMPLIANCE OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S (MPCA) MEMORANDUM "CONCRETE WASHOUT GUIDANCE". 7. LOCATION OF STOCKPILES OF NATIVE SOILS AND/OR BORROW MATERIALS INDICATE HOW STOCKPILES WILL BE KEPT IN COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES AND MPCA REQUIREMENTS. LoLo THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO START WORK UNTIL THE ENGINEER HAS REVIEWED AND ACCEPTED THE CONTRACTOR'S EROSION / SEDIMENT um z CONTROL SITE PLAN. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PRACTICES O z a 1. ALL CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE EACH WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS ON THE END OF A STORM EVENT RESULTING IN 0.5uS INCHES OR GREATER WITHIN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. THE INSPECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE ECS. mr Q 2. PERMITTEES MUST IMMEDIATELY INITIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS AND COMPLETE STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE 2 z 00 O CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. p N 0 3. ALL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD WORKING ORDER; IF A REPAIR IS NECESSARY, IT SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REPORT. w v Of 4. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR DEPTH OF SEDIMENT, TEARS, FABRIC ATTACHMENT TO POSTS, AND THAT POSTS AND FABRIC BOTTOM ARE FIRMLY ^ 0 5 � O= IN THE GROUND. z } 5. BUILT UP SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SILT FENCE WHEN IT HAS REACHED ONE THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE OR SOONER. Z co Lu 6. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR DEPTH OF SEDIMENT, ABSENCE OF TEARS AND TO ASSURE THAT THE DEVICES ARE SECURELY IN O Lu Z Y PLACE. = w Oz CONSTRUCTION NOTES: -i w 1. PRIOR COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN ANY AREA OF THE PROJECT, DOWN GRADIENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT 2 Q CONTROL MEASURES AND CONCRETE BARRIERS DELINEATING THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED BY THE 00 } ECS AND THE ENGINEER. o U) 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AS REQUIRED BY THE MPCA'S N w NPDES PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION. THIS INCLUDES ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEYOND THAT SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 3. PHASED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE USED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT. 4. THE MAXIMUM TIME ANY AREA CAN REMAIN OPEN WHILE NOT BEING WORKED IS 7 DAYS. FERTILIZER SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED AT A RATE N OF 250 LBS/ACRE. 5. IF DOWN GRADIENT BMPS ARE OVERLOADED DURING A STORM EVENT, ADDITIONAL UP GRADIENT BMPS ARE REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOAD. THE ADDITIONAL BMPS MUST BE RECORDED ON THIS SWPPP IN THE AMENDMENTS TO SWPPP SECTION. 6. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE m w WATERS INCLUDING STORM WATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES. ALL STOCKPILES 0 0 _j° SHALL BE COVERED OR STABILIZED TO LIMIT WIND EROSION. a z a IL 7. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR THE PROJECT. A VEHICLE TRACKING PAD SHALL BE INSTALLED IN o � o Lu ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN AT EVERY PROJECT ENTRANCE. ENTRANCES MUST BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED TO z � `� w = ENSURE PROPER FUNCTION. U) w o 00 0 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN ALL TRACKED MATERIALS USING A STREET SWEEPER WITH A PICK UP BROOM ON ADJACENT ROADWAYS can °� CQ = z ON A DAILY BASIS AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. F 0 F w a Q 2 9. CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNPCA AND THE EPA CONCRETE WASHOUT GUIDANCE. a ° w z w 0 2 O = J Lu Q CONTROLS LL O W - Q N F_z D0 of oz 0 PERIMETER/SEDIMENT CONTROLS: U Q ow Q 0 z < ff Q w 0 o ONE CONSTRUCTION EXIT/ENTRANCE SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH END OF THE PROPERTY. ALL CONSTRUCTION 00 � w-0-zw TRAFFIC SHALL UTILIZE THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT(S) SUCH THAT TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT IS MINIMIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT. SILT w w O Q z z F FENCING, BIOROLL AND SILT DIKES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PERIMETER AND/OR DOWNSTREAM GRADIENT OF THE AREA TO BE DISTURBED. INLET = U) 2 � w g o PROTECTION WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED ON ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. Z cn U) J THE PERMIT REQUIRES THAT TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, AND THAT THEY BE U) � Q INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. EFFECTIVE BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WHERE NO U O= CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL OCCUR FOR A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS. w o STABILIZATION PRACTICES: w o o Q N Q m m TEMPORARY STABILIZATION INCLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCING ON THE DOWNSTREAM GRADIENT OF THE AREA TO BE DISTURBED. Q C) m w INLET PROTECTION WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED ON ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT c) = w 2z v CONSTRUCTION. EFFECTIVE BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL OCCUR FOR Y < w < z A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS OR MORE. STABILIZING MUST OCCUR WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. cn 0 0 0 STOCKPILES WILL BE KEPT IN AN ORDERLY FASHION IN AN AREA DESIGNATED BY THE EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR ON THE CONTRACTOR'S EROSION / SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE PLAN. THE STOCKPILES MUST HAVE PERIMETER CONTROL AND STABILIZATION IF SOIL STOCK PILES REMAIN FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS. STABILIZATION OR COVERING THE PILE WITH PLASTIC OR GEO-TEXTILE MAY ALSO BE NECESSARY FOR CONTROLLING DUST. PERMANENT STABILIZATION INCLUDES BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, PLACEMENT OF CURB AND GUTTER, PAVEMENT, AND FINAL LANDSCAPING AND GROUNDCOVER ACCORDING TO THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ANY REMOVALS SHALL BE LIMITED TO THAT WHICH IS REQUIRED AND IN AN ORDER THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE REMOVAL AND z (L CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. O OTHER CONTROLS U WASTE MATERIALS: ALL WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY HANDLED, STORED, AND DISPOSED OF. CONSTRUCTION CHEMICALS AND CONCRETE WASHOUT LL WILL BE PROPERLY CONTROLLED TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM ENTERING STORM WATER DISCHARGES. U) SANITARY WASTE: z ALL SANITARY WASTE SHALL BE COLLECTED FROM THE PROTABLE UNITS AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL REGULATION. O HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS: U ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED AND DISPOSED OF IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED BY LOCAL OR STATE REGULATION. n/ Z MATERIALS WITH THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH SHALL BE STORED UNDER COVER (E.G. PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS.) MATERIALS O SHALL BE STORED IN A RESTRICTED ACCESS STORAGE AREA TO PREVENT VANDALISM. THE CONTRACTOR'S PERSONNEL SHALL BE INSTRUCTED IN THESE PRACTICES AND THE CONTRACTOR'S EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SEEING THAT LL THESE PRACTICES ARE FOLLOWED. OFF-SITE VEHICLE TRACKING: 0 O ♦^ v♦ PAVED STREETS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN OF DEBRIS. STREETS SHALL BE SWEPT WITH A PICK-UP BROOM AS NECESSARY OR AS z Z DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. DUMP TRUCKS HAULING MATERIAL TO AND FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH A TARPAULIN. ALL J W VEHICLES EXITING THE SITE SHALL BE GUIDED AND REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT. j ' O ♦ ) LL J VW DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING: C~ 0 C W ♦�♦ IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED PRACTICES DESCRIBED IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL SHOULD BE v FOLLOWED. DISCHARGE OF STORM WATER AND GROUND WATER FROM CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING ACTIVITIES IS COVERED UNDER THE GENERAL PERMIT. d >. O O z W Lu VEHICLE FUELING & MAINTENANCE: 0- O WHENEVER POSSIBLE, VEHICLE REFUELING AND MAINTENANCE SHOULD NOT BE PERFORMED ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. HOWEVER, ANY VEHICLE Lu L REFUELING OR MAINTENANCE THAT MUST TAKE PLACE ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST HAVE PROPER SPILL PREVENTION CONTROLS IN PLACE PRIOR TO �/ Q O COMMENCING WORK. ♦ O J J Lu EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES MUST BE CLEANED REGULARLY TO PREVENT A BUILDUP OF OIL AND GREASE. BERMS, SANDBAGS, OR OTHER BARRIERS SHOULD BE V USED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE MAINTENANCE AREA TO PREVENT STORM WATER CONTAMINATION. MAINTENANCE AREAS SHOULD BE CLEARLY Z DESIGNATED. SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (CAPABLE OF HANDLING 110% OF MATERIAL) MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL FLUIDS GREATER THAN 55 GALLONS. ALL Q O WASTE FLUIDS MUST BE IN LEAK -PROOF CONTAINERS. w 0 DUST CONTROL: SHEET NUMBER DUST RESULTING FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK EITHER INSIDE OR OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY, SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY THE U) C302 CONTRACTOR BY APPLYING EITHER WATER OR DUST PALLIATIVE, OR BOTH. cu M 0 rn O N 0 .Q O 7q Z Q n Lu H r� 4 N N co cu W U a� N 0 M cm C J O O U) Z O U c O a� U O cn co W J UI Y I I EXISTING BUILDING IN1\ I W I I - ------ �� 6- S00.44'47"N 68.87'- - - - - -� - - --- I�- ------ ---------r--+-r r' iw I Izw j ^ III I I I I I I I •`'� OW - 40 FT BUILDING SETBACK r 3 FT. UTILITY EASEMENT a� I ; III III I I I I Qw i CEJ1R DOC. N0. 379143 Law I Il l III III I I I ------- (if ------------------ _----------°°-- --- I ---------- III III \ l• -- I ��� \\ _ _ - - - -s � --- \ - \ \ \ � �- - - - - - - - I ---� II III III I 144, ' \ Z .\� Q -V-A _ I I�----------- s I o IF -+ VROBLE-=_:I -- - -�' \ 14 \P' I' III II rrrrr r r � III `-------�-- --- rrrrr rr �ll -_ 70' I - - _ _--------- � � - ,- - � � \ rrrrrr�rr 111 Row- �- -\. � rrrrrrrr I / I R�•0' 11 111 / FUTURE ADDITION ±8,700 SF Q I O S / 33 UNITS Q i 1 rrr rrr- MISSISSIPPI 1 100 FT BUILDING SETBACK '�� + J � #--f r #--f60' DRIVE I I,�I t\rr rrr� (BITUMINOUS PUBLIC ROADO) I O O `� y� J ���r W , 1. 60 FT CLEAR SPACE ` A X \ \\\ 1 1\ 1 M o ON 6 / �-� / P 1 X06 0, h orf 0 D� 1 ■ DRAINAGE AND � \ \ r UT 1O i \\ i UTILITY EASEMENT I Fj• \ / .--•.--• // \ A I I \ I I \I 6o D / \ \o �� W 1 I 1 I I \I I \\ X06 M E O 1 1 \ \., I SENIOR LIVING FACILITY `v K I 1 I I \ �j I \ QQ L F E ±3+,237 SF \ B co,L v \ �� ' °P L \ o. O 92 UNITS 1 GUEST UNIT I I I \ I Q\ G THREE STORY WITH IN �\ a o '0 I I R I \ . I I �\ \�\� / OON UNDERGROUND PARKING V � l�F \ , I I 20.0'--,\ O D ti I I I \ T. �\ © u� 5.01I 10.0, L D \ \ o. -�• I\ 24.0' , o J L 6 0, M ro0 R30) Iq '✓` H \ \ C CONTRACTOR SHALL \\ I I I I I\ I I \ N t3� 0 /, �� MATCH EXISTING CURB Z I II �� I I \ I I. \ \ ��� p " AND PAVEMENT FOR I m I I I \ \ \ \ P 40 FT BUILDING SETBACK PATCH WITHIN HART -p AND CLEAR SPACE BOULEVARD PER CITY I I II I\ I \\ p M i SPECIFICATIONS. L ® o, / \\\„ L II i II W 111 \11 I I goo o\\ H N� I I I\ 1 1 \ 11 H \ \ R12.01 1 I I\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ L 1 \ \ \ \ �a \ \ \ \ m z \ CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT FOR PATCH U `L�0 1/0 \ WITHIN HART BOULEVARD PER CITY SPECIFICATIONS �;•/// / Ile- - \\ V \ Y / / V \ p P C / \ SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3 FT AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10 FT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5 FT. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY CONERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC, DATED 09/07/2018. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 5.02 ACRES. 9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9 FT IN WIDTH AND 20 FT IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. KEYNOTE LEGEND AO CONCRETE SIDEWALK BO PIPE BOLLARD OC MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER DO ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP OE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN O ACCESSIBLE PARKING, REFERENCE DETAIL FOR LAYOUT AND R-4 MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY DIMENSIONS OAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. HO STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT O PROPOSED BACKUP GENERATOR ENCLOSURE, REFERENCE FRONT = 100 FT ARCH./MEP PLANS FOR DETAIL JO PROPOSED TRANSFORMER, REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR DETAIL OK HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT OL B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) OM TRANSITION CURB NO FLAT CURB OO MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER OP 6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 1' OFF PROPERTY LINE OQ HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT OR 10' ASPHALT PAVEMENT O 4' BLACK ALUMINUM FENCE, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS vJ FOR DETAIL OT MUTCD R1-1 STOP SIGN UO MUTCD R5-1 DO NOT ENTER SIGN VO COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE O EXISTING CITY LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ❑ ❑ Q IN PLACE O SITE MONUMENT SIGN, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR Lu 0 o Q DETIAL LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PARKING SETBACK LINE PARKING SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED 10 FT ASPHALT PATHWAY PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY SUMMARY MONTICELLO SENIOR LIVING TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 218,666 SF (5.02 AC) EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 218,666 SF (5.02 AC) EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 0 SF (0.00 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 90,305 SF (2.07 AC) 42% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 128,361 SF (2.94 AC) 58% ZONING SUMMARY Ir�nww z R-4 MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY EXISTING ZONING RESIDENCE PROPOSED ZONING R-4 MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENCE = z FRONT = 100 FT BUILDING SETBACKS SIDE = 40 FT Q a U Z J awwww REAR = 40 FT CLEAR/OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS HART BLVD = 40 FT (HART BLVD - 50% IMPERVIOUS) CO. RD. 39 = 60 FT HART BLVD 40 FT CLEAR/SPACE 11,592 SF (0.35 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 35.24% OF CLEAR SPACE BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS 1.� PROPOSED PROPERTY BUILDING AREA PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROPOSED PARKING PROPOSED UNDERGROUND PARKING ADA STALLS ABOVE GROUND REQ'D / PROVIDED ADA STALLS UNDER GROUND REQ'D / PROVIDED TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING 218,666 SF (5.02 AC) 31,749 SF (14.5% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) 46 STALLS 58 STALLS 48 STALLS R. w Q D U) z O w 0 Z Lo Lo Z OCLJ Z WI.-: co Z U o O O N w U w ? Z o o z Q� w Z2 W o J w OS2 } LU J W - Q Y } c N� O > CD CD N } LL m O ❑ ❑ J w z �QzQ J Q Z O F O wocncl) Ir�nww z 111 STALLS LL j LL a Q W� LL O O O = z U) Cr ~ LU 2 J Q a U Z J awwww uj Q U FLL LL U 2 ❑ r Z rn LL O J Q O w �0 9 wFwQ�Q }Uz2WO o LLILLI U) vJ z =U)2=W2 o Z J H oO ❑ ❑ Q w p _ U) Lu 0 o Q Q a C o w m w Y w z z Y U U) ❑ ❑ U 3 STALLS / 3 STALLS Z 2 STALLS / 2 STALLS z J O 111 STALLS uj F_ L.L vJ z O U L.L Z O LL F_ Oz O cn J Z - Im W 1 F -w D a Lu C G U = � Q ♦� v o' HD a�Q W z 2 W Q a O C0 G W � Q 0 Z O J W LL U_ H Z GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET w 0 0 20 40 80 � U)SHEET NUMBER c/) C400 (a L0 M O cy) 0 N O Q O Z Q n Z ry 0 U N a) (B n U W W M C J O c (3) U) Z O F) U c O a) U O cn W cn w J I H Y I II �J I I CO rn -' r----\ I f ---r V RIO BLE-_==1�_ ' o M 942.66 I M I I M 942.50 I ✓ I� M o l v o I rnn M � rn Ia I �0') M 942.08 MIS P\ i \\� 941.93 RIVE I 944.0 OI� G:943.44 (BITUM D 99 I � 944.65 \ I� G:942.39 � ce)r r G:943, I ® \\ RC\ I \� I0''i d \ I \ I I I I I G:942.69 � \ ic co l y O I M I ° � co! \ I M 0) N I i�I y r l I 0) \ I � I I I� 7 �_ (G944.45} / - I I II \ I I G:944.96 _ I I I I G:9 5.06 I I- I II G:9 y I \ Ido 1 t \ v \ y V 951 oc 927 STORM MI -F - \�g RIM=928.1 ' 92s \ INV -915.5( -929 p LEGEND z - - PROPERTY LINE D037Ni0 BIlLDNKi00 o °s EXISTING CONTOUR � (D' co _PO m m rn rnla II rn rn I� I 923 PROPOSED CONTOUR � zz Lw �omz I (D PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) �_ n O n_ - - - PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE ROUND INLET CASTING po "O' I PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) 34 II II 935 II' � p N I ® PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT 93C j< I 36" RCP l PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION _ 936 II =� I b60 PROPOSED RIPRAP 935m I / \ III A PROPOSED STORM SEWER 934 yJ (' C I J 933 III I I - - �I - - PROPOSED STORM SEWER rt 939 I _AO 70' III PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION r r r r r II ,935�OW - 100.00 III PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION � \ / HP:0.0 � PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION v��/ G:0.00 PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION lo �rrrrrrn"� nl M / -936- PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION ��rrr °'M T:0.00 r r r r m # PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION 0-00-00-0r je / 0-0r r �7 g37 7//�/ ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW r �c X / r i--� ��114 938 O - M % PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION \N r0_00% PROPOSED ADA SLOPE 2.93% 3:944.86LQ P-944 54 -�/ ___944� 945' d ro U:946.11 T/G 946.43 G:945.94 � `co T/G:976.66) Q \ \ 947 ME:947.20 Q, T/G:948.01 T/G:948.14 AQ ME:949.37) s � \ V941.351 939. a 940.VIIA/// / Q / T)G:641.29 )�/ y^ r, \ GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE -VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL IN NO 49 z �Q SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR .0 0d <z0F AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL / w0�� / 950 ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO 0 a j H aQW'-0 PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE v ISSUES. m z ��jao ~W L.L 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. < U FU = p H 0 U) Z rn V941.351 939. a 940.VIIA/// / Q / T)G:641.29 )�/ y^ r, \ GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE -VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL z �Q SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR 0 0 <z0F AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL w0�� BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY of Lw Z d LL ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO 0 a j H aQW'-0 PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE v ISSUES. m z ��jao ~W L.L 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. < U FU = p H 0 U) Z rn 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF �� v ) iY 0 Of 0 z LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN z wFw<�Q �Uz<w0 LANDSCAPE AREAS. o coLLI n Q 0 18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN U z =W212 w2 CONNECTION. ryN 19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING O H MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 0O ❑ ❑ Q w p _ U) u_ 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. H z o 0 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. z 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" ❑ ❑ U WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. \ V941.351 939. a 940.VIIA/// / Q / T)G:641.29 )�/ y^ r, \ GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE -VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL IN NO � 2 L.L W 0 - NORTH 0 LL GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 0 20 40 80 W U) R. w Q 0 Z O U) w 0 Z z Z O J Z a W U) Z U m O O N w U LU Z Z V) < I -:Lo W Z W J wz S2 O Q) }Z - Q 00 Y } N UN LL @ > ■ z O L0 N LL m O ❑ ❑ J w CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL z �Q SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR 0 0 <z0F AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL w0�� BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY of Lw Z d LL ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO 0 a j H aQW'-0 PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE v ISSUES. m z ��jao ~W L.L 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. < U FU = p H 0 U) Z rn 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF �� v ) iY 0 Of 0 z LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN z wFw<�Q �Uz<w0 LANDSCAPE AREAS. o coLLI n Q 0 18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN U z =W212 w2 CONNECTION. ryN 19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING O H MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 0O ❑ ❑ Q w p _ U) u_ 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. H z o 0 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. z 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" ❑ ❑ U WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. � 2 L.L W 0 - NORTH 0 LL GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 0 20 40 80 W U) R. w Q 0 Z O U) w 0 Z z Z O J Z a W U) Z U m O O N w U LU Z Z V) < I -:Lo W Z W J wz S2 O Q) }Z - Q 00 Y } N UN LL @ > ■ z O L0 N LL m O ❑ ❑ J w rn �Q � <z0F - w0�� W of Lw Z d LL � 0 a j H aQW'-0 O O o m z ��jao ~W 2 J Q a U Z J <wwww < U FU = p H 0 U) Z rn I. 0,ff Z Q O iY 0 Of 0 z U) O wFw<�Q �Uz<w0 � o coLLI n Q O af Ozz z =W212 w2 o Z U) U) J H 0O ❑ ❑ Q w p _ U) w 0 o Q Q H z o ww m w c Y w z z Y � � U U) ❑ ❑ U Z Q J a 0 z 0z � J - W w � 0 a Lu LuV H z L a 0 U) 0 Z a U) � Q O J W U H z O 2 SHEET NUMBER C500 M 0 CV O .Q 0) z J n W LL] U) IY 0 W L6 N (B n U W N M 0) c J 0 c 0 U) z 0 7 U c 0 0 U 0 cn W w J I U H Y �1//�r ------r-- --� / /i +c N I I \ I / o 01. c,-- \ I 1 a 01�/ 1 `r -----__\-------- I�- STR-9 -, f Ro BLE - _ _ _� RE:940.94 \I \ co IE:934.26 W I r, rn IE:935.26 SW I I 9rn M IE:934.16 S I Yrno Inrn MISP RIVE (BITUMUBC ROAD11R 2 rn rnN rnM rn U I \ 11A\\ I ■ �� - I� I -13 18 I NI RCP , \ \ I I IM @ 0.. AE N LO 50% \ \ I RCA IAI� QTR -8 / RE:942.16 \ 4.480/, � T IIE:93,.88E STR -2 I � I I I CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM. I SER FES 1 18"" 8 \ CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPE � rn c RE:933.93 0 AND INVERTS. c i IE:932.14 N I I \ W\ I I ) I I II I I � 7 I� II tu;- >\ \ \ I I \ \ I \ I \ \ \ I I \ \do 1 I \ STR -28 FES 18" \ \ \ RE:946.42 3 IE:944.63 W \ CC\ STR -27 \ CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES c� AND INVERTS. \ / IE:944.80 E\ \� I V 951 'A/X 00 927 STORM MW - �\X928 \ \� R928.11 _ 9 i 9 \ \ 2y � INV=915.5(E � � \ \� - 929 O _ 930 - \ - 2.93% � _9Q� \ \ 944 RE: 4.04 IE:935.12 N IE:935.12 SE 945' \ C,51 a°6 \ i 4 �' ` Pay / / / \ i Izz RCP 949 9 ' 49 �0 100 -Year Post -Development Rate (CFS) 1.07 4.17 8.46 Rate Attenuation Summary - Offsite South • 0.10 I 0.51 I 1.25 950 - Offsite North 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" Post -Development Rate (CFS) I 0.08 I 0.45 I 1.08 Rate Attenuation Summary - Combined LU Post -Development Rate (CFS) I 1.25 I 5.13 I 10.79 2 J Q H a (-U) Z � < W W O < U W _� U 2 _ F_ _j J a o Rate Attenuation Summary- North 2 -Year 10 -Year 100 -Year Pre -Development Rate (CFS) 0.69 2.75 6.10 Rate Atten uation Summa ry - South Pre -Development Rate (CFS) I 0.60 I 2.39 I 5.32 Rate Attenuation Summary - Combined Pre -Development Rate (CFS) I 1.29 I 5.14 I 11.42 Rate Attenuation Summary - South 2 -Year 10 -Year 100 -Year Post -Development Rate (CFS) 1.07 4.17 8.46 Rate Attenuation Summary - Offsite South • 0.10 I 0.51 I 1.25 Rate Attenuation Summary - Offsite North 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" Post -Development Rate (CFS) I 0.08 I 0.45 I 1.08 Rate Attenuation Summary - Combined LU Post -Development Rate (CFS) I 1.25 I 5.13 I 10.79 z z (-j6 o o _z 2 N N o_6 IQ O) p) J U, -_6 J rn � � M � 925 II �M> VI) (if • PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) ® PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT 36" RCP LEGEND - - PROPERTY LINE 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EXISTING CONTOUR 925 PROPOSED CONTOUR Q PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) • PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) ® PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT PROPOSED RIPRAP - - 1)I - - PROPOSED STORM SEWER GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE -VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN SOF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. z 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT 0 PLUMBING CODE. <z0F - 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN r� CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. v IYFnM W z d LL D 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" j H a- <Lu WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT O o 0 DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. LU VJ z 0 U 0 LL 0 z C� LU 0 - NORTH olf 0 LL GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 0 20 40 80 LU U) U) R. w Q 0 cn z O (7 w 0 z z z OCLZ W U) Z U m O O N w U Lu Z 0 O z < Lo LU Z fE W J ° w o }Z - Q Y } 00 N UN LL O Lu ■ /z o L0 N r LL m O ❑ ❑ � W rn p iYQ � <z0F - wo�� W IYFnM W z d LL D 0 a j H a- <Lu O o 0 0 d O LU = z D F_~ W V 2 J Q H a (-U) Z � < W W O < U W _� U 2 _ F_ _j J a o Ii 0 Z N W F Z � ❑ ofOOf❑z I) Q p W F W < - < }Uz2WO � o co w Q O 0-1 z af o z =uai�=w2 o Z w w J H 0 O ❑ < w p _ Lu 0 o Q Q m < p m w m w C Y W z z Y U w ❑ ❑ U z 2 Oz � J - W w D 0 a LU LU0 Q� V z O LU Q 0 Z a I) � Q O J W U H z O 2 SHEET NUMBER C501 (B CO O rn O N O Q z J H J U N a) IZ- co n 0 U W W M ,_ J O c (3) 67 z 0 F) U c O a) .00 U O cn W cn w 0 J UI H Y \1 1� 0—ELC 0—ELC 0—ELC F 7 % STR -7 48" SSWR MH CONNECT TO EXISTING i SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. INV SW: 934.52 PER AS-BUILTS DATED 5/25/99. i I E:934.62 E i D G RELOCATED HYDRANT AND VALVE // \ IN, \ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET !0 20 40 80 I LEGEND Q PROPOSED REDUCER 14 PROPOSED TEE ►/ PROPOSED GATE VALVE Q Z O F PROPOSED HYDRANT O PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE co PROPOSED SANITARY CLEANOUT 'fu�ww Z d PROPOSED WATERMAIN / PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER j d O PROPOSED STORM SEWER ELC PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC COM PROPOSED TELEPHONE GAS PROPOSED GAS MAIN UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8. IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. KEYNOTE LEGEND AO CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN WITH 12" X 8" TEE AND GATE VALVE OB 8"X6"TEE CO 8" DUCTILE IRON WATERLINE OD 8" GATE VALVE OE 8" 45° BEND OF 8" 22.5° BEND GO 8" 11.25° BEND HO PROPOSED HYDRANT NATURAL GAS SERVICE 5 FT FROM BUILDING FACE, REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR OI CONTINUATION. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CONNECTION WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANY AT PROPERTY LINE. JO 6" GATE VALVE OK 6" DUCTILE IRON WATERLINE OL 6" 90° BEND } m w H Q D W z O w O z z O J z a LU U) Z U m O O N w U U) Lu Z 0D O z CD Q (o LU Z W J w O2- y }0Z J W - Q Y } 0 N � W ■ z C) u') L0 N N LL m O ❑❑Jw rn c0 �Qz< Q Z O F w0�� 'fu�ww Z d j LL H i Q W LL O O 0 j d O = z LQ ~W 2 J Q H a U Z J Q w W W Q U w m= U = p H J z LL OW Q O F -z _j❑ of oz o WFWQ�Q }Uz2WO o w f z z =U))2�wz 2 o z w w J H o O D Q w p _ U) Lu 0 o Q Q Q o ww m w � Y W z z Y 3 U z U) ❑ ❑ U z a J z a O >_ F U J F ���^ vJ z O U z O LL F_ Oz O J Z - m W 1 F_w D a Lu C G ULu♦� = Q v Lu H z O 0 a W Q O Z a L.L � Lu a Q O J W LL U_ 0 z z W U) SHEET NUMBER U) C600 Gravel pads) MnDOT Class CA --15 or CA -25 Riprap Bedding Geotextile fabric Original grade 55ECTION R -R (not to scale) Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates r x - Original Geotextile fabric SECTION A -A grade (not t0 SCOIe) NOTES: Channelize runoff to sedimentSediment Trapping Device trapping device J r r4Q � i o Ribbed -or Corrugated steel plates r ' / A A r A �\ A —tee o oE / u Q � 6 r}� Dw al 3- � f d mc / B a ~ 24' min. F- C -0 / SOpe away from LLJ f highway 50' min - Match or Right of Way Existing Grade PLAN RADE LOW * AGGREGATE SHALL BE 3/4"-2" ANGULAR CLEAN STONE Title: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello Dote:06_ 4 Plate No. Revised. 03-1 5 002 MIN. STORAGE VOLUME 3600 C.F./AC OF DRAINAGE AREA W o W SECTION A -A Av �J H TED OUTLET ISOMETRIC VIEW 2 H ORIGINAL GROUND ELEVATION OR i.ej BERM -RIP-RAP - ofQzQ GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (SEE MNDOT SPEC. 3733) L (SEE PHASE I SITE MAP) / /-BERM TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP SCALE: N.T.S MAX DRAINAGE AREA: 5 ACRES L (IN FEET) = 6' OR 1 x DRAINAGE AREA (AC) WHICHEVER IS LARGER 11 r� 12" MIN. FREEBOARD DESIGN FLOW DEPTH DISTURBED AREA, CONSTRUCTION SITE, STABILIZED STORAGE AREA OR STAGING AREA l2f MAY rX� v/r7�ikr—� EXISTING PAVED 12' MIN CONSTRUCTION MATS, WOVEN OR TRM ROADWAY 30' MIN END OVERLAP 18' MIN 'TDF nVFRI AP TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES. 1 1 STRAP ....................... CONNECTORS CONSTRUCTION MAT END OVERLAP INTERLOCK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS END OVERLAP� I Q CID PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Q<" �o Qom' �J o� W oma' SIDE 0 0 ; /OVERLAP Title: Mud Mat Entrance Date:06- 4 Plate No. Revised. 4 6003 06-1 'NOTE 1 CHANNEL LINED TO PREVENT EROSION (SEE TABLE IN THIS DETAIL) TYPICAL TRAPEZOIDAL DIVERSION 12" MIN. FREEBOARD- \ HW -- NOTE 2 W --< DESIGN FLOW DEPTH---,, 1 \-N OTE 1 CHANNEL LINED TO PREVENT EROSION (SEE TABLE IN THIS DETAIL) TYPICAL PARABOLIC DIVERSION 12" MIN. FREEBOARD-\ DESIGN FLOW DEPTH NOTE 2 � 1 `NOTE 1 CHANNEL LINED TO PREVENT EROSION (SEE TABLE IN THIS DETAIL) TYPICAL VEE -SHAPED DIVERSION DIVERSION DITCH SCALE: N.T.S 11 EXISTING CURB OVERFLOW IS .3i OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT AN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23• HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. • FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CO -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello DEFLECTOR PLATE — OVERFLOW IS ] OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT - OVERFLOW AT TOP OF / FILTER ASSEMBLY FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised:5004 03-15 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE LOCATION OF THE SWPPP DOCUMENTATION (BINDER AND SITE MAPS) ON THE SITE. z \i \4' Z1U V) -v- g) Z Pr) SWPPP SIGN DETAILS SCALE: N.T.S 11 WING NUT OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD r ATTACHMENrIA00K 1 SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL " PROVISION 38M II I 11 a A a A 9 a ' A a V 6 Q a a OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD f' • 0.i STAPLES PER SQ. YD. L•1 SLOPES Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 4' (MINIMUM) i.ej I "SWPPP INFORMATION" MUST BE �'--"-SWPPP - ofQzQ DISPLAYED PROMINENTLY ACROSS INFORMATION THE TOP OF THE SIGN, AS SHOWN IN ins STAPLE51PER50,71), V SLOPES THE DETAIL. EL woU)fn COPY OF z COPY OF STATE COPY OF Lu W W zCL>W GENERAL SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION O CONTRACTOR (TCEQ) SITE NOTICE SIGN TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF A RIGID NOI cSITENOTICE o MATERIAL, SUCH AS PLYWOOD OR-'-,, OUTDOOR SIGN BOARD. SIGN MUST BE z ~W CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER TO 2 J Q H a0 U z J awWwLu PROTECT DOCUMENTS FROM DAMAGE COPY OF Z DUE TO WEATHER (WIND, SUN, COPY OF GENERAL GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S MOISTURE, ETC.). GONTRACTORSTATE v PERMIT SUPPLIED AUTHORIZATION CONSTRUCTION Q O SITE NOTICE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE LOCATION OF THE SWPPP DOCUMENTATION (BINDER AND SITE MAPS) ON THE SITE. z \i \4' Z1U V) -v- g) Z Pr) SWPPP SIGN DETAILS SCALE: N.T.S 11 WING NUT OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD r ATTACHMENrIA00K 1 SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL " PROVISION 38M II I 11 a A a A 9 a ' A a V 6 Q a a OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD f' • 0.i STAPLES PER SQ. YD. L•1 SLOPES Standard Plate Library City of Monticello SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnOOT SPECIAL PROVISION 38% Title: Inlet Protection Grate Inlet Corer Date: Plate No. 03-07 Revised:6005 03- 5 3.i5 5TAPLSS PER 5CsY0. HIGH FLOW CHA MELS SHORELINE i. PREPnAE SOIL BEPME WSI'PLJNG BLAmET8. INCLUDING PLAY NECESSAW APPLICATION OF LIME, reimum. AND SEED. P. BEGIN AT YHE tCP OFTHE SLOPE BYANCHOMNO THE BLANKET IN A 6' (IS—jW0- x B' (]Son) wdelft! H WITh APPROXIIAA= 17 (9 ) OF BLANKET E TENDMBEYOND THE JT UDM PORTION OF THE TRETODM ANCHOR TTE BLANKET VJTFI A ROW CFSTAPLE&STARES APPROXIMATELY 1S IN=) APART LATHE BOTTOMOF THE TRENCH. HACCN AND CClAPACT THE TPFKCH AFTER STAPUNG- APPLY SEED TO GOI&PACTED SOIL ANQ FOLD RE]1AH61G it (3D.M POWnOKOFIILANKETgACKGVERSEEDANOCOIePACTPB,901L. RECIIRE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED WIL WITH A ROW OF 9TAPLE7W5TAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 1711 -)APA TACRp THE WIDTH OF THE RAWET. 3. ROLL THE DukWE TS iA.f DOOM CA tty HORIZONTALLY AQROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPTRATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUSTSE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPCESGTACES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONSA9 SHOAVN IN YHE STAPLe PATTERN GLIDE. WHEN USINW)PI'I"L DDT SYSTEM. STAFLE&STP!(ES 5 ULO BE PLP.GED THROUGH EACH OF THE CTJLONED DOTS COMEBPGNDING fp THE APPROPRLATE STAPLE PATTERN. q, THE E GES OF PAA.SLLELBLANKETS MUST BESTAPLEO VdfH APPRO%R4ATELY TS' IEcn*+2.6anj WERLAP DEPENOM ON RLAtF.ETTYPE. TTS ENSUREPRCPER REAM LLIGNMERT, PLA.CETHEEDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING KANKET (BLMMETBF]NG INSTALLED ON TOPI EVEN W" THE IDU I] BEAM STITCH oN THE PREVIOUSLY!? S ALLED BLANKET_ 6. CONSEWTVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWNTHE.!' CPE MUST BE PLACm ENDOVER END PINGLE STYLE) WRFI AN APPROXIMATE 3' R.r­) GVERLAP, STAKE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPRWIMATFLY 1j•i3Dhni APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. NOTE; IN LOOSE 90IL CONDITIDNB, THE USE OP,3TAPLE DR STAKE LEWTHB GREATER THAN B' (16-1 MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Title: Erosion Control Blanket. Standard Plate Library Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello Date: 03_08 Plate No. Revised: 0,3 - 15 6011 } m w H Q 0 W Z O > w 0 z L0 L0 Z O J Z a LU U) Z U Co O O N w U LU v Z 0 O 00 Z Q F-LIDW WZ J O LUz S2 O } LU LU — Q Y } ao � CD 00 N � LU D C:) Ln N } w Ga O ❑❑JL i.ej 3.3' - ofQzQ 3.3' J ins STAPLE51PER50,71), V SLOPES SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnOOT SPECIAL PROVISION 38% Title: Inlet Protection Grate Inlet Corer Date: Plate No. 03-07 Revised:6005 03- 5 3.i5 5TAPLSS PER 5CsY0. HIGH FLOW CHA MELS SHORELINE i. PREPnAE SOIL BEPME WSI'PLJNG BLAmET8. INCLUDING PLAY NECESSAW APPLICATION OF LIME, reimum. AND SEED. P. BEGIN AT YHE tCP OFTHE SLOPE BYANCHOMNO THE BLANKET IN A 6' (IS—jW0- x B' (]Son) wdelft! H WITh APPROXIIAA= 17 (9 ) OF BLANKET E TENDMBEYOND THE JT UDM PORTION OF THE TRETODM ANCHOR TTE BLANKET VJTFI A ROW CFSTAPLE&STARES APPROXIMATELY 1S IN=) APART LATHE BOTTOMOF THE TRENCH. HACCN AND CClAPACT THE TPFKCH AFTER STAPUNG- APPLY SEED TO GOI&PACTED SOIL ANQ FOLD RE]1AH61G it (3D.M POWnOKOFIILANKETgACKGVERSEEDANOCOIePACTPB,901L. RECIIRE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED WIL WITH A ROW OF 9TAPLE7W5TAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 1711 -)APA TACRp THE WIDTH OF THE RAWET. 3. ROLL THE DukWE TS iA.f DOOM CA tty HORIZONTALLY AQROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPTRATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUSTSE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPCESGTACES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONSA9 SHOAVN IN YHE STAPLe PATTERN GLIDE. WHEN USINW)PI'I"L DDT SYSTEM. STAFLE&STP!(ES 5 ULO BE PLP.GED THROUGH EACH OF THE CTJLONED DOTS COMEBPGNDING fp THE APPROPRLATE STAPLE PATTERN. q, THE E GES OF PAA.SLLELBLANKETS MUST BESTAPLEO VdfH APPRO%R4ATELY TS' IEcn*+2.6anj WERLAP DEPENOM ON RLAtF.ETTYPE. TTS ENSUREPRCPER REAM LLIGNMERT, PLA.CETHEEDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING KANKET (BLMMETBF]NG INSTALLED ON TOPI EVEN W" THE IDU I] BEAM STITCH oN THE PREVIOUSLY!? S ALLED BLANKET_ 6. CONSEWTVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWNTHE.!' CPE MUST BE PLACm ENDOVER END PINGLE STYLE) WRFI AN APPROXIMATE 3' R.r­) GVERLAP, STAKE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPRWIMATFLY 1j•i3Dhni APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. NOTE; IN LOOSE 90IL CONDITIDNB, THE USE OP,3TAPLE DR STAKE LEWTHB GREATER THAN B' (16-1 MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Title: Erosion Control Blanket. Standard Plate Library Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello Date: 03_08 Plate No. Revised: 0,3 - 15 6011 } m w H Q 0 W Z O > w 0 z L0 L0 Z O J Z a LU U) Z U Co O O N w U LU v Z 0 O 00 Z Q F-LIDW WZ J O LUz S2 O } LU LU — Q Y } ao � CD 00 N � LU D C:) Ln N } w Ga O ❑❑JL - ofQzQ J QzoF- EL woU)fn z Lu W W zCL>W O j/ �f aQWYI� W O O o a- < a- 0 a_ z ~W U 2 J Q H a0 U z J awWwLu I..L Q U FU= �p-,l- z M W O J of Q O w I -z =)❑ of0a-,❑z p W F w Q Q }Uz2WO O co w U) O 0-1 -zW of Q O z U =U)i2=wz 2 o Z cn r(n U Orn ❑ rn ❑ J Q w p O = (n w O Q 00 Q m O It Q ww m m O Y w z z 3 W Y U Z — W �w�aWa U) ❑ ❑ U J z O W U j I..L z O U Z O � Oz O Cl) J Z — W �w�aWa O C LU H Z 0 0W a Q 0 z a cl) 2 L Qo O LU W LL U_ 0 ~ Z w Z) U) SHEET NUMBER C/) C700 :J I 1 +. Je CONCRETE CURB - AND GUTTER a , I+ EXPANSION JOINTS EXPANSION J OINTS A B,_ y � � . 4 4 18COTO BE POURED INTEGRALLY EXPANSION EXPANSION WITH CURB JOINTS A JOINTS 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER 17- MIN - di WIDTH VARIES - SECTION B -B P LAN VAR+AgLE 7 1/4 p R FMI � -3'4 „' T„ . 97:7 5' MIN, 18" SECTION A -A Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Tit! e. Commercial Driveway Entrance Date: 03-05 Plate No. RevLsBd:03-15 5008 IV A �r NOTES: - PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6" (153 mm) DEEP TRENCH AND BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY. - POSTS SHALL BE: - 4' (1.22 m) ON CENTER - 2" (50.8 mm) X 2" (50.8 mm) HARDWOOD, PINE OR STEEL FENCE POSTS. MINIMUM LENGTH 4.5' 71171\/rAI n /n CA, --\ II,IT/1 TI Ir- /1 In/111A I r-\ EROSION CONTROL FENCE SCALE: N.T.S R1-1 rn co Of < STOP R5-1 "Reduce spacing 40% j R B C ❑ E F 18 .375 6 6 C 3 7.75 24 .625 8 8 C RCP AT OUTLETS 01 30 .75 10 10 C 5 125 38 .875 12 12 C 6 15 TABLE OF QUANTIES 8 20 MUTCD R1-1 STOP SIGN SCALE: N.T.S 23.5 20 14.5 COLORS: LEGEND - WHITE (RETROREFLECTIVE) MUTCD R5-1 BACKGROUND - RED (RETROREFLECTIVE) RIPRAP SIGN SCALE: N.TLRS: 1-1 RIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS - REQ (RETROREFLECTIVE) 1-G'(D Z LEGEND&BACKGROUND-WHITE (RETROREFLECTIVE) 0o ❑ ❑ Q CLASS Ili CLASS IV CLASS V Q m OW m O Y D 50 - 9" D 50 12" D 50 - 15" _ Ln ❑ ❑ U U DIA t5- 7.5" t8" 9" 24' t2" • •.. Z ROUND DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH LL PIPE RIPRAP GRANULAR RIPRAP GRANULAR RIPRAP GRANULAR GEOTEXTILE FABRICQ 0 i� [IN] (CUYD) FILTER (CU YD) FILTER (CLI YW (CU YD) (CU YD) 91 -TER (CU YO) SECTEON B -B 0 LU 2 2.1 1.1 2.5 1.3 3.4 1.7 v� -�, 15 2.9 1.4 3-5 1,7 4.6 2,3 Q OLU f8 3-6 1.8 4-4 2.2 5.8 2.9 8 0 O 1 21 4-6 2-3 5-6 2.8 7.4 3.7 HUTS AND DOLTS ON Q U_ 24 5-S 2-9 6-9 3-5 9-2 4-6 TRASH GUARD MUST q >-IS C. 27 6.9 3.d $-3 4.F 11.0 5.5 REMAIN EKPOSEO. T C701 ��..I 30 8.3 4-1 9-9 5-0 13.2 6.6 36 1t.4 5.5 13.2 6.6 17.6 8.8 2' - 0 a] 42 13.6 6.8 16.4 8.2 21.8 10.9 W OR SPAN T•P� 46 is , a 8.4 20.9 10.1 26.8 13.4 �e - f� 54 1 60 19-8 23-0 9:9 11 23-7 t1-9 27-6 i3-8 31-6 3E-8 15.8 18.4 A }- A J C 2• �i 1 fib 72 27.4 34.1 13-5 15.6 32.4 16-2 37-4 18.7 43-2 49-8 21 6 24-9 F: 1 84 49.0 20.D 48.0 24.0 6.4.0 32.0 1 96 45.5 22.8 54.6 27.3 72.8 36.4 - RIPRAP AT RCP -A OR BOXES OF EQUIVALENT SPAN WIDTH 1 CLASS Ili CIAssIV CLASS V 4 0 50 = R" D 50 = 12" D 50 = 15'B A SPAN 15" 7.5" 18" 9" 24" 12" 5D ROUND DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEM N m PIPE RIPRAP GRANULAR RIPRAP GRANULAR RIPRAP GRANULAR PLAN a• FILTER FILTER FILTER (IN} (CU YD) (Cli YD) (CL1 Y$) (CU YD) CCU YD} (CU YD) SEE SECTION 02511- SPECIFICATIONS � 2 3.6 1-8 4-4 2.2 5-8 2-9 O>F RIP RAP PLACEMENT 28 5.8 2.9 6-9 3.5 9.2 4.6 GROLITFD RIPRAP 36 8-1 4A 9.8 4.9 13.0 6.5 2' CD !ti 43 11.0 5.5 13.2 5.6 17.6 8.8 0 (Yi 1 51 I 58 13.5 16.5 6.8 8-3 16.4 8.2 19.8 9.9 21.8 26.4 10.9 13.2 T 65t9.8 9-9 23.7 11.9 31-6 15.8 73 23.3 1 1.8 27.9 54.0 31 .2 1 86 . ��' �t - X31 88 32.4 16.2 38.9 19.4 51-8 25.9 " - -� 102 115 43.5 44.0 21.8 22.0 52.2 26.1 52.8 26.4 60.6 70.4 34.8 35.2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (2) O 122 49.3 24.5 59.1 29.6 78.8 39.4 r•r 138 51.3 34.6 73.5 36.8 98.0 49,0 SECTION A -A p 1 154 74-4 37.2 89.3 44.6 t 19.0 59.5 O (1) FOR PIPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 48'. USE 24 Or� NOTE: REOIREMENTS FOR RIPRAP SIZE. THICKNESS. THE FADRIC SHOULD COYER THE AREA, GF THE WILL BE DESIGNATED IN PLANS. RIPRAP AND EXTEND UNDER THE CULVERT APRON 3 FEET - :J I 1 +. Je CONCRETE CURB - AND GUTTER a , I+ EXPANSION JOINTS EXPANSION J OINTS A B,_ y � � . 4 4 18COTO BE POURED INTEGRALLY EXPANSION EXPANSION WITH CURB JOINTS A JOINTS 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER 17- MIN - di WIDTH VARIES - SECTION B -B P LAN VAR+AgLE 7 1/4 p R FMI � -3'4 „' T„ . 97:7 5' MIN, 18" SECTION A -A Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Tit! e. Commercial Driveway Entrance Date: 03-05 Plate No. RevLsBd:03-15 5008 IV A �r NOTES: - PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6" (153 mm) DEEP TRENCH AND BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY. - POSTS SHALL BE: - 4' (1.22 m) ON CENTER - 2" (50.8 mm) X 2" (50.8 mm) HARDWOOD, PINE OR STEEL FENCE POSTS. MINIMUM LENGTH 4.5' 71171\/rAI n /n CA, --\ II,IT/1 TI Ir- /1 In/111A I r-\ EROSION CONTROL FENCE SCALE: N.T.S w C X E Y X C A A 3 mm) BLOWN/PLACED FILTER MEDIA TM WOR K A B 'F �C D E A B R1-1 rn co Of < STOP R5-1 "Reduce spacing 40% j R B C ❑ E F 18 .375 6 6 C 3 7.75 24 .625 8 8 C 4 110 01 30 .75 10 10 C 5 125 38 .875 12 12 C 6 15 48 1.25 16 16 C 8 20 MUTCD R1-1 STOP SIGN SCALE: N.T.S 23.5 20 14.5 COLORS: LEGEND - WHITE (RETROREFLECTIVE) MUTCD R5-1 BACKGROUND - RED (RETROREFLECTIVE) ENTER SIGN SCALE: N.TLRS: 1-1 w C X E Y X C A A 3 mm) BLOWN/PLACED FILTER MEDIA TM WOR K A B 'F �C D E A B 2" X 2" X 36" WOODEN STAKES PLACED 5' O.C. FILTREXX® SOXXT. (12" TYPICAL) SECTION 2" X 2" X 36" WOODEN STAKES PLACED 5' O.C. WORK AREA PLAN ROTECTED AREA TO BE PROTECTED FILTREXX® SOXXTM (5" OR 8" TYPICAL) NOTES: 1. ALL MATERIAL TO MEET FILTREXX® SPECIFICATIONS. 2. FILTER MEDIATM FILL TO MEET APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS. 3. COMPOST MATERIAL TO BE DISPERSED ON SITE, AS DETERMINED BY ENGINEER. FILTREX BIO -ROLL SCALE: N.T.S CONTRACTION JOINTS L12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" GLASS 5 -4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTLRVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised. 03-'05 03-17 50 2 R. W Q 0 (n z O in W O z L0 Z O J z< W U) Z U 00 O O N w U W Z Q O Z L0 LU Z fE W J wz S2 O }z��J W - Q Y } 00 o cn N LY W U z Ln N W m O ❑❑J W rn co Of < R5-1 w0U)� DO NOT ENTER Of -ww ZLL>LLH B C D E F G H J K L 3C 6,5 4D 2 5 01A 14.5 12.5 9.75 10 1.875 7.875 36 7.5 5 D 2.5 6 17.5 15 12 12.375 2.25 9.813 48 11 6D 3 8 23.5 20 14.5 15 3 11.75 MUTCD R5-1 DO NOT ENTER SIGN SCALE: N.TLRS: LLI Of-zw af z SYMBOL - REQ (RETROREFLECTIVE) Z LEGEND&BACKGROUND-WHITE (RETROREFLECTIVE) 0o ❑ ❑ Q 1-73 _ U) LU 0 °oQ�Qm 2" X 2" X 36" WOODEN STAKES PLACED 5' O.C. FILTREXX® SOXXT. (12" TYPICAL) SECTION 2" X 2" X 36" WOODEN STAKES PLACED 5' O.C. WORK AREA PLAN ROTECTED AREA TO BE PROTECTED FILTREXX® SOXXTM (5" OR 8" TYPICAL) NOTES: 1. ALL MATERIAL TO MEET FILTREXX® SPECIFICATIONS. 2. FILTER MEDIATM FILL TO MEET APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS. 3. COMPOST MATERIAL TO BE DISPERSED ON SITE, AS DETERMINED BY ENGINEER. FILTREX BIO -ROLL SCALE: N.T.S CONTRACTION JOINTS L12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" GLASS 5 -4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTLRVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised. 03-'05 03-17 50 2 R. W Q 0 (n z O in W O z L0 Z O J z< W U) Z U 00 O O N w U W Z Q O Z L0 LU Z fE W J wz S2 O }z��J W - Q Y } 00 o cn N LY W U z Ln N W m O ❑❑J W rn co Of < QzOP w0U)� Of -ww ZLL>LLH a Q W Of LL O O O j d O = z CQ ~W 2 J Q Ha0ZJ Q W W Lu Q U W F= Of U = ❑ ::iH of J Z LL O J Q O W F Z =) ❑ ofOOf❑z p W F LU F0 Q �Uz2w0 O Co < LU cn LLI Of-zw af z Lu U -IO =U)i2=wz 2 o Z U) U J 0o ❑ ❑ Q W o _ U) LU 0 °oQ�Qm Q m OW m O Y W W z z Y U O U W �[if 2 Ln ❑ ❑ U J IIIIIIII� z F O LV U J �D/ I..L ��1-^ VJ � z O U 01L Z O LL F- 0 O Cl) Z 0 LU F- J w > D O LU H v� Q�v LU H z_ O a w Q OLU Z a 0 O J W LL U_ 0 ~ Z w D U) SHEET NUMBER C/) C701 /f 1 sWF SLOPE AS ROADWAY r; IHDaIZDNTAL�•�.�: (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION DIVIDER PLATE 3"R-\ (D SLOPE 0.06 FT FT NORMAL, 11NLE55 f / STANDARD PLATE ND- 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT I` SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GLHTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0-0474 CU YDS ./ LIN FT (13512) MAY BE TILTED 8612 CONCRETE CURB & OUTrER CONCRETE - 21.1 FT / CU- YDS. (B612) DIVIDER PLATE 3"R- 1 3R .3 SLOP1/2 E 0-06 FT/FT . OR �.:. SLOPE 3/4"/FT0 2" MIH 7^ HORIZONTAL. UNE �8 MNDOT ®SLOPE 0.05 FT/FT NORMAL. UNLESS / STAhDARO PLATE NO. 7103 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIRD. IF A OIFFRRFNT SPECIFICATQH REFERENCE 2,531 MAYBE TILTED 8618 THE FORM CONCRETE - 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE- 17.28 FT / C .1 2 CU YDSS- (B6,UN g)�e618] 12" 3/4 ' PER FT 1/2 " R 1/2 R 7'� 110. HDR120NTAL� LIRE 2'- D" I MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Title: Standard Concrete Curb &Gutter rd Plate Library for Streets City of Monticello Date: 03_05 PIote No. Revised: ❑3-15 5005 � A DIMENSION 4 TYPE Pavinq Area A B C Light Duty 1.5' 2" 6' Heavy Duty 2' 2 8' D Concrete Section see note Light Duty see note Heavy Duty DIMENSION d TYPE A B C 6' 6' see note l' 6' see note NOTE: Compacted subgrade should be as specified in NOTE: Compacted subgrade should be as specified in soils report. soils report. HMAC (surface) 4000 PSI conc. HMAC (binder) = m paving (min.) w/ wire mesh ° Aggregate bass0 G n: 1.�=�n I, lfi��T=rrE '11 H per sotechnical Report Subgrade 48" 3 (2) - R -4976-4A 1� CASTINGS OVERFLOW ELEVATION / PRECAST CONCRETE STRUCTURE RE: 932.23 8" X 8" SKIMMER BOTTOM OF DRY INFILTRATION BASIN ELEV: 930.20 �6" DIA. ORIFICE IE: 931.20 'E SOILS (SCARIFY TOP 18") 1v1EDIA.IE:939.20 MNDOT SPEC. 3877 FILTER TOPSOIL BORROW, MODIFIED TO HAVE A MIXTURE BY VOLUME OF 80% SAND COVER MEETING GRADATION REQUIREMENTS OF SPEC. 3128 "FINE AGGREGATE FOR PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE" AND 20% MNDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST. CONTRACTOR IS TO NOT COMPACT INFILTRATION BASINS. OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OCS-1 NO SCALE 12" OUTLET PIPE f Fl-� IE: 923.23 R. W Q D CO z O U) w O z z z 0 J Z a W U) Z U OOO O N w U LU z Q z U Q w Z W J w O }LU J W — le Q Y } 0 o cn N � W Ln N } w ❑ ❑ O W X �QzQ x X QZOF IL� � O�Fnw= Z IL LT 5; iW LL H O LQ CQ Q z F~ F W Q � 2 J H 0- U Z J < LU w Lu F- U) w 2 IY U =X F ❑ J Of LL X X LLO�Jw F- Z =) ❑ OfOOf❑z X W FLU<-< U Z W ~O X X 2 w LL Q W (n Z W Of Q z WILLO Z_ _ U) w 0 z x x x 0O X X X H w p _ U) LU 0 o Q Q m Q m ww m C O Y W W z z Y U O U w 0 ILL 2 O7 ❑ ❑ U U) J z F O LV U j z O U L.L z O LL F— Oz O Cl) J Z — M W F- LU D o a LU C G U = LU ♦� v 0' H D _ M LU O Z a LL/ � LU Q o O LU W LL U_ 0 ~ Z Lj Z) U) SHEET NUMBER C/) C702 co Cfl Ch O r O N O .Q J Q W r) J U I ti U 4 L co n U M 0) C J O C W z O 7 CU O O �U O Tn Tn Ln W J UI H Y USE NEENAH R -1642-A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755 -G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER 15 APPLICABLE, R-1642 WITH 3 SOLID LID JE BEARING OR CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) EAT OPPOSITE SIDE EXCEPT FOR LETTERING 25 3/4 1 1/2 'ET -1 BEARING SURFACE TO BE MACHINED l t_1 28 1/2 " 36" COVER FRAME Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 1 USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20' Title: Standard Frame and Cover Date: 03-05 Plate No. 1002 Revised., 03-15 TIES REOUIREO TD CLEAN OUTS r FINISHED GRADE 1 �] r B` PVC RISER FOR NDN --RESIDENTIAL ( 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR fi" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/a BEND- _ \l CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG PVC HDRITONTAL WYE (WC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1- PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6' VERTICAL AWE 45' KENO AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH_ 2- CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE - Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised.3 0 0 6 03-15 T'- d" .I DR 5' IN BACK OF CURB IF CONCRETE WALK OR BITUMINOUS PATH ARE HYDRAFINDER PRESENT FLAG WATERDUS MCIDEL 67 HYDRANT YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG wI TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. AFTER BACK -FILL g G' OR FUTURE BREAKOFF FLANGE CCJUfI B DR GUTTER LINE STREET 1" TO 2" MAXIMUM ABOVE BURY LINE (FINISHED GRADE) FINISHED GRACIE 4- �I VALVE BOX AS WATERMAIN SPECIFIED i1 " TO 2" x �o 2 LAYERS OF 0 z 2'-- S" AS REQUIRED 10' POLY (4 mil) o - - - - TYPICAL - s 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PITS ONDER RYDRANT FILLED WITH �� T/A STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR A MINIMUM Of 1 C -Y, OF 1 1-1/2" CLEAR STONE �t WITH PRDTECTNE COATING AS t +` O f MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OI OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG MECRLUG V it �L .. j _ GATE VALVE TEE ` THRUST IAEGAWG y1 BLOCKING BLOCKING BEHIND BELOW GATE THRUST HYDRANT\\ -PRECAST CONCRETE BASE VALVE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15"x 15"x 4") BEHIND TEE Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Typical Hydrant Installation Date: 03-05 Plate No. 2001 Revised:03— 1 CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) °CRETE% OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND ! BUILDING /� MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE I CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND I PIPE 512E I WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT SPACED 16- GC, L 6" I E" 4,0 59 PT 6A 50 FT ALL MANHOLES WITH • STANDARD MANHOLE �Aa usnwc RINGS INSIDE DROP SECTION -: AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL_ MIN 4" - MAX 12" SHALL BE W DLA (I.D.)27" DIA TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CIN CONTRACT ADJUSTING RINGS MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE MIN 4" - MAX 12" WITH NDN -SHRINKING CEMENT MANHOLE SECTION TO BE j' 1 LL O J Of F.; ASTM C-476 CLASS II USE R-2 JOINT FOR :_ p CIRCULAR R£INIF T O BARREL TO CONFORM LATEST REVISION TO ASTM C-478 '• LATEST REVISION+.; _ I 45" DSA Tn cn U USE R-2 JOINT FOR -' I w p CA t ALL MANHOLE JOINTS I m q m O Q O STEPS AT 7 a C Y w 16" DC O U w � LU 2 8" U ❑ ❑ U U "CRE-SEAL","RESEAL", DR APPROVED EQUAL o a" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED Z FOR CONNECTION AIDE TO MANHOLE 2 VVARIABLE MAX, 24- L PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION >:^. ;.::. -;:: • `6" MIN WITH INVERT U) #5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY J Z — STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE NOTES- �1 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I --PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC-) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC- 1F PROP M GREATER THAN 24" INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP, A,,Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Sanitary Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. n Revised. 3001 3001 1� I MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR STRIET BUILDING 44 MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL 1NC-) INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONRZACT INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND I PIPE 512E I BEARING AREA SPACED 16- GC, L 6" I E" 4,0 59 PT 6A 50 FT WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 154 PSi. 1 10" - 12" I STANDARD MANHOLE 3, THRUST BLOCKS BEARING AREA TO BE POURED I 16 FRAME AND COVER AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL_ POLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CIN CONTRACT ADJUSTING RINGS MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE MIN 4" - MAX 12" WITH NDN -SHRINKING CEMENT I 27• pq :• WITH EXTERNAL OR LL O J Of F.; n INTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL I USE R-2 JOINT FOR :_ p ALL MANHOLE JOINTS T O BARREL TO CONFORM 8"! TO ASTM C-478 '• LATEST REVISION+.; I Z Tn cn U 48" DIA J ❑ ❑ Q w p CA t Standard Plate Library City of Monticello MEGALUc � MEGnLUG rtr•• r. TEE AND BEND BEND Title: Cone Section, Casting Steps, and Adjusting Rings Date: 03-05 Plate No. 1001 Revised., 03-15 J WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL. POLY PLUG PLUG NOTES: STRIET BUILDING 1, THRUST BLOMNG TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1/7 INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONRZACT INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT AND OVER. I PIPE 512E I BEARING AREA 2, THRUST $LOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USER WHERE L 6" I E" 4,0 59 PT 6A 50 FT WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 154 PSi. 1 10" - 12" I 12,0 SQ FT 3, THRUST BLOCKS BEARING AREA TO BE POURED I 16 20.4 SO FT AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL_ POLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET 4, POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CIN CONTRACT 2 J SHALL BE USED FOR 12" OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 4, ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN TO FT, OF A BEND LD FU =M ❑ -, I- SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS LL O J Of :Standard Plate Library ity of Monticello Title: Blocking for Watermain Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:2002 03-1 TOP Of PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN /DOT 2105} A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 85% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 957 OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REOUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised. 03-15 007 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Tracer Wire (New Developments) Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised:3005 03-15 } m w H Q D Z O 0 > w O Z 0 L0 Z O J Z a W U) Z U 00 O O N w U W ?Z Z Q H LID W Z af w J LLUU O } LU J W — Q Y } 00 O (n N � W U z O CD N } w m O ❑❑ J W STRIET BUILDING of INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONRZACT INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT rTRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND LINE I TRACER WIRE SPLICE i CURB BOH STANDPIPE 1 I ICOPPETO HE FRONDED UNDER PRIVATE R -CLAD STEEL Arita 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 3D MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE GREET) COLORED JACNa=T I 1 1 2' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 PGAUgUYETHYLENE G ER IREN:50 M1 EO H D N ITM TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT CONTRACT --- -� - - r 1" COPPER WATERMAIN O O O COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER HIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET U CO ~ F LUQ TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CIN CONTRACT 2 J SANITARY SERVICE MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Tracer Wire (New Developments) Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised:3005 03-15 } m w H Q D Z O 0 > w O Z 0 L0 Z O J Z a W U) Z U 00 O O N w U W ?Z Z Q H LID W Z af w J LLUU O } LU J W — Q Y } 00 O (n N � W U z O CD N } w m O ❑❑ J W rn O of Qz0P w0�nv1 Of W zD_>LL� aQWofw O O O j a CO = z U CO ~ F LUQ 2 J H a U Z J Q W LU LU Q U LD FU =M ❑ -, I- J z LL O J Of Q O w F z ❑ ❑ OfOof❑z p w F w Q- Q }Uz2WO O Il w UUU 0-1 O z =U)i2Hwz � D Z Tn cn U Ow J ❑ ❑ Q w p CA = W O CD Q Q m O Q O m Ow m W C Y w z z Y � � U O U w � LU 2 U ❑ ❑ U J z O LV 1 U J 'AZ) I.`L — U) z O U Z O 2 1 O U) zz J Z — W � w � O a LU V� Q�C� UJ H zW 0 a >. Q � � Z a � O J W 0 ~ Z w � SHEET NUMBER � C703 A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED: R-2 I I GLORIUS CHRUCH \ I ZONED: R -A G \\\\\ III SII I I ! -7-SUM �_RIVTB�� 3-WSB 11 -RT O I I O ----- —-r----—,.�.,..`. 3-MYS T � � i �,�M iiiiuiniiininniiiii niiiiii i iiiiiiiinniniii iinninniii ii uiiii,�i iiiuiniiiuiniiiiiiiiiiiiinnuiiiiiiniu�� III III I I I /I ' N „1111 v - - 9� CH 3-TCH C O l � \���"` + � 5 -QUO O I I I / I P - WS , p,: + + + + + + .. � 3-MYS = I I `t� M - I I I / I E��= .• + +* II I II II I LG ,/ I I I I III l / .�_ •• 11 - NH8 - R - SG 3 -TC r L 5 -RV 8+ 1-NWM 11 SU �� G 1RV - SGJ ---- —_-- - U- + Ill% IIIIII/ 70/IZ Row - - RV 10 -CHB IIIIII III -111 IRW / 5-QUC (_l - WSe o ''' I STORM WATER / � iiiQ\\\"\ MANAGEMENT AREA ///#, I I R LANDSCAPE I I I •� 1- S J qqwl��.. %,, L101 ENLARGEMENT BOL /// B + + **+ 0 5 -WH C 11 I II 3- ALS * �' + ' �� �� / N ' ` I- M 11 I 11 -NOR Uq m • 11 I + D ��" + §0 \ III O 11 I I 13 -AN l� + " o`` /% 41 IN A � • Inu I lululli ulnlnl � // jI li I I B =SSL ** Off\-\,�y ** * * ° GOJ ♦ p /ir LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) + EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) ' APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL ■.•• •• DISTURBED ARA (TYP.) EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE (TO REMAIN) (TYP.) SEED LIMIT LINE (TYP.) I O 1 1I A 14��� P�'`� • ~ -J ♦♦�,� LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES O I I U 1 1 I NOR I (/ ♦ + ° a * ° ♦ j OA EDGER (TYP.) I I I `Wool III 1 341-S _ ++** ° °' ��� * + + * 0 / O DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) I I I I.JJ I1 I 10 -SGJ j+ � + A �/ /� I I I I1 I I + * + • o ° MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) v • S� O �\ 3 - � / \ OD SOD (TYP.) I I I Q �I11 I I I �_ 10 + + + * /�� = / \ O ANNUALS BY OWNER (TYP.) Wz I 1 I I1 I I I rz B I *! °v ° ��0 7 / / / / \ \ F SAVANNA GRASS SEED MIX, I II I 1 4- SBH B ✓ 6-B / \ O AVAILABLE FORM PRAIRIE RESTORATION, INC. LU ZO I I1 I I I • • • GHS rr + EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) 7 \ 'Uc� IN► I -SSC — • + / �' \4 i / / / O ROCK MULCH (TYP.) zI I I 'I I II I _ALs / • • 4 -WL �,. / ��� \ 7 y I I � I I 1 - • Zo- � % lir 1 1 I 5 -BH I I 1 VACANT pC ►11 I I - + ' + ** 9 G /�# 10 - AJ i / / ZONED: B-4 I I 1 ►1 v I A * B //♦ o — LANDSCAPE SUMnAARY 1 III \ ► \ \\ \ B 6- RW 9 /%�I ♦ ii��// i / 1 -GSL 1 -SSC O 13 - ANH •� / I/ / 11 EfD R 3 -ALS ' - JN - B 2NO\ -� ♦� /� \ -- • �G�P \ \ %\ \ \ \ * ' c ° ♦ �� %� �� PLANT KEY 10 - SGJ41 c��� ♦♦ , O'RYAN'S MARATHON CONIFEROUS SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME \ i♦ \ / ZONED: B-4 SGJ Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' JB Juniperus horizontalis Blue Prince' �1� � GOJ Juniperus virginiana Grey Owl' i WBM Pinus mugo'White Bud' \\ \ ♦ v ` PLANT KEY TAU Taxus x media 'Tauntonii' \ HMA Thuja occidentalis 'Holmstrup' CONIFEROUS TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME \ / / BHS Picea glauca 'Densata' Black Hills Spruce DECIDUOUS SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME \/ CHB Aronia melanocarpa elata MYS Picea meyeri Meyer Spruce RTD Cornus sericea 'Baileyi' \\ WHC Thuja occidentalis White Cedar' White Cedar \ III DBH Diervilla lonicera I ORNAMENTAL TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME \\\\ ALS Amelanchier x grandiflora Autumn Brillance' Autumn Brillance Serviceberry Clump ANH Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' \ RVB Betula nigra River Birch Multi -Trunk AJN Physocarpus opulifolius 'Jefam' WSB Betula populifolia 'Whitespire' Whitespire Birch Clump PJM Rhododendron x'P.J.M.' TCH Crataegus crus-galli inermis TM Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn GLS Rhus aromatica Gro -Low SSC Malus x `Spring Snow' Spring Snow Crab Apple Multi -Trunk SUM Rhus typhina Tiger Eyes' IRW Ostrya virginiana Ironwood JWS Spiraea albiflora QUC Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen Clump PERENNIALS BOTANICAL NAME ALM Allium x 'Millenium' JTL Syringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac Clump MAG Astilbe chinensis Maggie Daley OVERSTORY TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME NOR Acer platanoides 'Pond' Emerald Lustre Maple DEU Astilbe japonica 'Deutchland' = NWM Acer rubrum 'Northwood' Northwood Maple OSF Matteuccia pennsylvanica H SBH Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Suncole' Sunburst Honeylocust GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME OZ KFG Calamagrostis x acutiflora Karl Foerster SWO Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak KKC Nepeta x faassenii Kit Kat BRO Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET WLC Nepeta x faassenii 'Walkers Low' 0 20 40 80 BOL Tilia americana Boulevard' Boulevard Linden AJS Sedum x 'Autumn Joy GSL Tilia cordata 'Greenspire` Greenspire Littleleaf Linden NOTE: SEE SHEET L102 FOR PLANT SCHEDULE. COMMON NAME Sea Green Juniper Blue Prince Juniper Grey Owl Juniper Mugo White Bud Pine Tauton Yew Holmstrup Arborvitae COMMONNAME Black Chokeberry Red Twig Dogwood Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle Annabelle Hydrangea Amber Jubilee Ninebark PJM Rhododendron Gro -Low Fragrant Sumac Tiger Eyes Sumac Japanese White Spirea COMMON NAME Millenium Ornamental Chive Maggie Daley Astilbe False Spiraea Ostrich Fern COMMON NAME Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass Kit Kat Catmint Walkers Low Catmint Autumn Joy Sedum TREE PRESERVATION INCENTIVES TREE PRESERVATION CREDIT: 47.5 CAL. IN. = (38 CAL. IN. X1.25) SEE C200 - TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL. VEHICULAR USE AREA LANDSCAPING INTERIOR PLANTING ISLAND- TREE REQUIREMENTS: ONE CANOPY OR UNDERSTORY TREE PER 180 S.F. INTERIOR PLANTING ISLAND- TREES PROVIDED: ONE CANOPY OR UNDERSTORY TREE PER 180 S.F., EXCEPT WHERE UTILITIES CONFLICT INTERIOR PLANTING ISLAND- SHRUB REQUIREMENTS: MINIMUM 25% OF THE TOTAL LAND AREA OCCUPIED BY LANDSCAPING ISLANDS IS PLANTED WITH SHRUBS INTERIOR PLANTING ISLAND- SHRUB PROVIDED: MINIMUM 25% OF THE TOTAL LAND AREA OCCUPIED BY LANDSCAPING ISLANDS IS PLANTED WITH SHRUBS VEHICULAR USE AREA PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS: 3' WIDTH MINIMUM EXCEPT ALONG STREET R.O.W., 6' WIDTH MINIMUM VEHICULAR USE AREA PERIMETER TREE REQUIREMENTS: 8 AGGREGATE CAL. IN.(ACI) OF CANOPY TREES PER 100 LINEAR FEET 28 ACI TREES= 8(339 L.F./100) VEHICULAR USE AREA PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED: 28 ACI TREES'= 10 CAL. IN. EXISTING + 18 CAL. IN. PROPOSED *MAY BE CREDITED TOWARDS PERIMETER BUFFER STANDARDS PERIMETER BUFFERS BUFFER TYPE REQUIRED- NORTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES: TYPE A - BASIC BUFFER TYPE A REQUIREMENTS- EAST PROPERTY LINE: 2 ACI OF CANOPY TREES + 10 ACI OF UNDERSTORY TREES + 15 SMALL SHRUBS PER 100 LINEAR FEET 14 ACI CANOPY TREES= 2 (669 L.F./100) 67 ACI UNDERSTORY TREES= 10 (669 L.F./100) 101 SMALL SHRUBS=15 (669 L.F./100) TYPE A PROVIDED- EAST PROPERTY LINE: 14 CANOPY TREES= 6 CAL. IN. OVERSTORY + 8 CAL. IN. CONIFEROUS 67.5 UNDERSTORY TREES= 67.5 CAL. IN. PROPOSED 101 SHRUBS TYPE A REQUIREMENTS- NORTH PROPERTY LINE: 11 ACI CANOPY TREES= 2 (512 L.F./100) 52 ACI UNDERSTORY TREES= 10 (512 L.F./100) 77 SMALL SHRUBS=15 (512 L.F./100) TYPE A PROVIDED- NORTH PROPERTY LINE: 18 ACI CANOPY TREES= 18 CAL. IN. OVERSTORY 53 ACI UNDERSTORY TREES= 53 CAL. IN. PROPOSED 77 SHRUBS BUFFER TYPE REQUIRED- WEST PROPERTY LINES: TYPE B - AESTHETIC BUFFER TYPE B REQUIREMENTS (20' WIDTH): 8 ACI OF CANOPY TREES + 10 ACI OF UNDERSTORY TREES + 15 SMALL SHRUBS PER 100 LINEAR FEET 68 ACI CANOPY TREES= 8 (846 L.F./100) 85 ACI UNDERSTORY TREES= 10 (846 L.F./100) 127 SMALL SHRUBS= 15 (846 L.F./100) TYPE B (20' WIDTH) PROVIDED: 68 ACI CANOPY TREES= 32 CAL. IN. OVERSTORY + 36 CAL. IN. CONIFEROUS 19.5 ACI UNDERSTORY TREES 127 SHRUBS SITE LANDSCAPING STANDARDS CANOPY TREES REQUIRED: 16 ACI PER ACRE* 81 ACI CANOPY TREES= 16 * 5.02 ACRES CANOPY TREES PROVIDED: 134.5 ACI CANOPY TREES= 58 CAL. IN.OVERSTORY + 29 CAL. IN.EVERGREEN + 47.5 EXISTING TREES *INCLUDIGN AT LEAST 3 ACI EVERGREEN TREES SHRUBS REQUIRED: 2 SHRUBS PER 10' OF BUILDING PERIMETER* 231 SHRUBS= (1,152 L.F./10)*2 SHRUBS PROVIDED: 232 SHRUBS= 119 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS + 113 CONIFEROUS SHRUBS' *1/2 OF THE REQUIRED SHRUBS SHALL BE OF AN EVERGREEN VARIETY. W z O w 0 z LO z O J z a LU U) Z U m O O N w U W' z �\ CD z Z CoCo w z W J 0 w O }z J W � � Q Y } c EN � w ■ z C) U') L0 N N r ILL p pW 00J N ofQz� (1) Q z 0 n w0U)Q of W d S 0I ❑ O a<aaW W z F p p co Z U Wzd 2:3 HaUZHO >_ aWWwUrn = F- p J F- Z Q o z Ii O U g Q N w o (LU O❑ Q W w o U Z 2 Q F- CO m p Q U F W o I. 0 u) ui WW <zw (n W0 0 H J H ❑ o = O N H " U) O Q Q m m Y � o z z WW m Q w W Y U J) 0 ❑ U z J W z a 0 a U) z U V L.L Q z Q O J U Z O LL F___ Oz O Z Cl) J K M W 10 F_ LU aLU V LU H 0 a Q LU z W O Z a LU Qo O LU W LL U_ 0 H Z W O SHEET NUMBER W L100 Q- 0 0 0- z -j 0 - LU C) U) r) z -j a) IZ- 00 C: co n r-) C) W Q) 0) .C: —j 0 C (3) U) z 5 6 7F) L) C 0 W .00 0 0 (n W 0 -j LANDSCAPELEGEND ZN— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — + + 3- - GOJ 3- EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE 3 - JWS (TYP.) X001 6 - DB + \\\\\X - GOJ 3 - JWS 1000* + - DBH + 3 - WBM '00e 3 -AN + + + "'WO/M 5 - RTD 3 - TA + EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE 4 - AN 01 + 10 - AL 11 - IR -3 - DBH .100e + - GOJ (TYP.) z + 3 - GOJ 5 -AN 3 5 - DBH 6- SGJ + %/ 3 - ANH -DB 7-WLC + 100e 9 -WL EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) + + 0 + + 3 - JWS 7 - TA -1- —3 - WBM EDGER (TYP.) (I . @ + 3 - ANH + + (3 - PJ + + APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD +\ 10 - AL + 5 - KFG ff / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL + + + 5 - JWS 3-DBH DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) + ++ + —3 - GOJ + EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE 5 -JB A + (TO REMAIN) (TYP.) 3 -GO SEED LIMIT LINE (TYP.) 0 D 100e -A H 3 - JWS 3- 1 o B + 3 - WBM 100e 0000, 4- + + ^.0 + \ + 100e - DBH + S F - GOJ 10-M + + 10- LC— + 25 - KKC- 17 - AL /-3 - JWS 22 - KF�--V\� TAU 5 -AN ML a F3 - WBM LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT SCALE: 1 " = 20' 1000, GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 PLANT KEY CONIFEROUS SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES 0 EDGER (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) @ SOD (TYP.) ANNUALS BY OWNER (TYP.) 0 SAVANNA GRASS SEED MIX, AVAILABLE FORM PRAIRIE RESTORATION, INC. EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) ROCK MULCH (TYP.) SGJ Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' JB Juniperus horizontalis 'Blue Prince' GOJ Juniperus virginiana 'Grey Owl' WBM Pinus mugo 'White Bud' TAU Taxus x media 'Tauntonii' HMA Thuja occidentalis 'Holmstrup' DECIDUOUS SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME CHB Aronia melanocarpa elata RTD Comus sericea 'Baileyi' DBH Diervilla lonicera ANH Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' AJN Physocarpus opulifolius 'Jefam' PJM Rhododendron x'P.J.M.' GILS Rhus aromatica 'Gro -Low' sum Rhus typhina 'Tiger Eyes' JWS Spiraea albiflora PERENNIALS BOTANICAL NAME ALM Allium x'Millenium' MAG Astilbe chinensis 'Maggie Daley' DEU Astilbe japonica 'Deutchland' OSIF Matteuccia pennsylvanica GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME KFG Calarnagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' KKC Nepeta x faassenii 'Kit Kat' WLC Nepeta x faassenii 'Walkers Low' AJS Sedurn x'Autumn Joy' NOTE: SEE SHEET L102 FOR PLANT SCHEDULE. COMMONNAME Sea Green Juniper Blue Prince Juniper Grey Owl Juniper Mugo White Bud Pine Tauton Yew Holmstrup Arborvitae COMMONNAME Black Chokeberry Red Twig Dogwood Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle Annabelle Hydrangea Amber Jubilee Ninebark PJM Rhododendron Gro -Low Fragrant Sumac Tiger Eyes Sumac Japanese White Spirea COMMONNAME Millenium Ornamental Chive Maggie Daley Astilbe False Spiraea Ostrich Fern COMMONNAME Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass Kit Kat Catmint Walkers Low Catmint Autumn Joy Sedurn L101 z LLI Z < a- z 0 LU CU) LLJ L 2� CL > LL I w 0,- 0 F < LU 1 3: 0- L SQ C�,�)) F- 0-� I LUU) '-- 0 -U) ZW (F < LU L = = Of C.) L F- F 0 z 0 LU LU < L C.) �Z 0 < z 2 co < LL1 — C ; 0 J W z -0 W F- w �-: LU U) 2� co 0 ,, U) LU z Cf) ZU) LU 0 3� Lu )- D W Z —i LU 2 > le < 00 ry @ Lu z D C) U') L0 N W W z 0 W Q� 0 z 2 0 Z 0 L — LU —j 6i 2 z 0 M C14 "r 00 (1) 0 . LU z I - co z (3 LLI _j 2 :3 _j Z: x -:� x z x < x >- x of x af Q 0 �– 0 — (0) LU LUW <ZW 0_ LU 0 < U) 0 z �: < < z 0 0 W U) j C� Lu C) 0 C,4 1-- C\1 U) U) CD < < C) < W LU C) LL1 z LU z < W < W 0 W [if = U) 0 0 C) F- LU Z CL LU < 2 z (0) LU 0 U) 0 z j U) j z z LU 0 0 z LL F- 0 z 0 0 K Cl) I j j M > 0 LL cl) LU F- LU — D LU 2 a LU LU F- z 0 M LU 0 0 0� E CL LU 0 0 LU LL 0 F - z Lij 0 Z) U) SHEET NUMBER C/) L101 A N � r o N Q a Z Q J 0 - LU W a U U) a J J 4-1 N _ co C) 0 M O) J O .E O Z U 0 75 U I W �I H } m PLANT SCHEDULE W CONIFEROUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SPACING CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING o 4zF GOJ 121 Juniperus virginiana 'Grey Owl' Grey Owl Juniper #5 CONT. 4' O.C. + BHS 13 Picea glauca 'Densata' Black Hills Spruce B & B 6' HT. �\ 0 HMA 17 Thuja occidentalis 'Holmstrup' Holmstrup Arborvitae #5 CONT. 3' O.C. + MYS 6 Picea meyeri Meyer Spruce B & B 6' HT. �_2x """ U) += JB 8 Juniperus horizontalis 'Blue Prince' Blue Prince Juniper #5 CONT. 5' O.C. z + WHC 5 Thuja occidentalis 'White Cedar White Cedar B & B 6' HT. SGJ 114 Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' Sea Green Juniper #5 CONT. 5' O.C. W ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SPACING + TAU 36 Taxus x media 'Tauntonii' Tauton Yew #5 CONT. 5' O.C. :. ALS 12 Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brillance' Autumn Brillance Serviceberry Clump B & B 6' HT. �+ WBM 12 Pinus mugo'White Bud' Mugo White Bud Pine #5 CONT. 3' O.C. • IRW 18 Ostrya virginiana Ironwood B & B 1.5" CAL. 0 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING z :. JTL 13 Syringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac Clump B & B 6' HT. 0 AJN 58 Physocarpus opulifolius 'Jefam' Amber Jubilee Ninebark #5 CONT. .: QUC 10 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen Clump B & B 6' HT. LO ANH 81 Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' Annabelle Hydrangea #5 CONT. 4' O.C. z :. RVB 12 Betula nigra River Birch Multi -Trunk B & B 6' HT. O z Q CHB 19 Aronia melanocarpa elata Black Chokeberry #5 CONT. 5' O.C. a Z w~ U) 00 SSC 3 Malus x 'Spring Snow' Spring Snow Crab Apple Multi -Trunk B & B 6' HT. Q co o O DBH 44 Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle #5 CONT. 3' O.C. o N °' cn W z • TCH 11 Crataegus crus-galli inermis TM Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn B & B 1.5" CAL. o D GLS 15 Rhus aromatica 'Gro -Low' Gro -Low Fragrant Sumac #5 CONT. 4' O.C. Q w Z W 6i J :. WSB 11 Betula populifolia 'Whitespire' Whitespire Birch Clump B & B 6' HT. 0 3: z Y =W o JWS 25 Spiraea albiflora Japanese White Spirea #2 CONT. 3' O.C. w z OVERSTORY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SPACING Y Q PJM 17 Rhododendron x'P.J.M.' PJM Rhododendron #5 CONT. 4' O.C. a0 o cn N ry • BOL 16 Tilia americana 'Boulevard' Boulevard Linden B & B 2" CAL. O O RTD 30 Cornus sericea 'Baileyi' Red Twig Dogwood #5 CONT. 5' O.C. ■ z BRO 1 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak B & B 2.5" CAL. N SUM 18 Rhus typhina 'Tiger Eyes' Tiger Eyes Sumac #5 CONT. • GSL 4 Tilia cordata 'Greenspire' Greenspire Littleleaf Linden B & B 2" CAL. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING m 00 -JO co W z<oNo • NOR 6 Acer platanoides'Pond' Emerald Lustre Maple B & B 2" CAL. ALM 37 Allium x'Millenium' Millenium Ornamental Chive #1 Cont. 1' OC Q z 0 � LO w0cn� Q W'(nwW J Z CL 5; W S 0- U) �cn�0� • NWM 2 Acer rubrum 'Northwood' Northwood Maple B & B 2" CAL. DEU 7 Astilbe japonica 'Deutchland' False Spiraea #5 CONT. 3' OC a W W w o ~ O F - U)_ J H a U z H 0 } QWWWU(n = • SBH 4 Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Suncole' Sunburst Honeylocust B & B 2.5" CAL. MAG 10 Astilbe chinensis 'Maggie Daley Maggie Daley Astilbe #1 Cont. 2' OC �o 0 W = z Q x 0��z z x J U g Q F- 0� p Q W X • SWO 1 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak B & B 2" CAL. �OSF 8 Matteuccia pennsylvanica Ostrich Fern #5 CONT. 3' OC 5 Q 0 Q a W X '�nnb m U j Q V Q af U 0 F 0 U) ui WWW<ZW GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SPACING = W 2 z> = U) S on- oao0 o AJS 70 Sedum x 'Autumn Joy Autumn Joy Sedum #1 CONT 18" o.c. W0 Doo, rn z 0 opo opo` o Q o Q °}° m d O Q ❑ } Q C:) W w KFG 49 Calamagrostis x acutiflora'Karl Foerster' Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass #1 CONT 30" o.c. Y _j 2 � 0 Q U) Q W 0 W [if 2 Cn ❑ ❑ 0 KKC 158 Nepeta x faassenii 'Kit Kat' Kit Kat Catmint #1 CONT 18" o.c. \ WLC 60 Nepeta x faassenii 'Walkers Low' Walkers Low Catmint #1 CONT 30" o.c. Uj W li/� J Z O U) LLJ Q Z I..L U) cn J z O U L.L z O LL Oz O Z Cl) J — W 1 � w D a Lu V LU H 0 a Q LU z W O Z a U) LU Qo O J W LL U_ 0 ~ Z w Z) SHEET NUMBER U) C/) L102 Q N N rn C N 0 Q U) J W 0 W n Q U W Z J J 4 a� U) c co n r) U N 0 c J 0 W Z 750 U C 0 fn a� U 0 U) U) U) Q W 0 J I H Y SOD 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH NOTES: 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10. FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. '`T"•"��9:1:7��7�7��7:Ie\:7��11�L�Z�7�711�1[�7CI TREE PLANTING DETAIL 1 SCALE: N.T.S. LAWN SIDE N_ r FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN, 1/2" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER PLANTING BED POLY EDGER DETAIL 3 SCALE: N.T.S. rii coricu GRADE AT SHRUBS/ PERENNIALS, 1" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER. 4" TOPSOIL PLASTIC DIVIDER: "BLACK DIAMOND" EDGING BY VALEEY VIEW SPECIALTIES CO. USE 20 FT. LENGTHS. USE KNURLED CONNECTOR AT SPLICES, USE CORNER, TEE, VEE, OR WIDE ANBLE CONNECTORS AT ANGLE CHANGES. 10" X 7/8" METAL ANCHOR STAKES AT 48" O.C., AND AT EACH END. MULCH AT PLANTING AREA SPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH, 4" DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWN SIDE LAWN GRASS FINISHED GRADE III III \\\\\JA II 1 SPADED EDGE DETAIL 5 SCALE: 1-1/2"=l' L103 NOTES: ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED I PLANTING BED AND tAurxrILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT Z o AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM U) H J GIRDLING ROOTS. 4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8. MIX IN 34" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. o W SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL L103 SCALE: N.T.S. F FINISH GRADE FOR LAWN " MAINTENANCE STRIP EDGER, AS SPECIFIED SOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING TOP TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR MULCH. III �� ��I �I� I I �I I III III III F9 7 SPECIFIED SOIL MIX MAINTENANCE STRIP DETAIL 4 SCALE: 1-1/2"=l' RETAINING WALL / BUILDING, EXTERIOR WALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM RETAINING WALL / BUILDING SPECIFIED ROCK MULCH E:"10T1NG GRADE ;EA ACCORDING TO NG DETAILS ABLE AS SHOWN L103 LL AREA 1. EXTENDED EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL SOIL TO A POINT DOWNSLOPE EQUAL TO OR LOWER IN ELEVATION THAN THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLE DIRECTLY BENEATH THE PLANT TO INSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IN HEAVY SOILS. GRANULAR SOIL MUST BE ADDED AS BACKFILL IN AREAS OF POOR DRAINAGE. STEEP SLOPE PLANTING L103 SCALE: N.T.S. L103 L103 LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. UUN I KAU I UK SHALL UUN I AU I UUMMUN CiKUUNU ALLIANCE A 1 1511 UK UALL611 .UUM I U VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA -GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH -BARKED TREES -FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED DARK BROWN, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY -VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V -SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN -GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED/ PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS/ PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. PROVIDE QUICK COUPLERS TO NATIVE SEED AREAS FOR ESTABLISHMENT, PERMANENT IRRIGATION IN THIS AREA NOT REQUIRED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS -BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. PERENNIALS AND SHRUBS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH DRIP IRRIGATION. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. z OJ z Q r m L C)0ac W, Q z azo` w O c � cn co � z a 5 w _ -icnQ�0F L �a =F(n� K 1 Lou 101-- _ ¢awwUI =wd'L O c ofocro� U F L U Q > U Z < co w -01-c )< O 1 W z =z ;O w : iQ w g z Z U � W Cl w a t o Z) z U) a �_: Z cl) W O 3: = w z J W Q co Y } 0 cn } m w Q D W z O U) w 0 z 0 z 0 z Lu J z Y o § a 3: 00 00 co J 0-- 0 O Lu z cn z U 11' J J Q � z o } N v 0 wwOQZzwui acn Li Z o � U) H J v cl 0 W a� U) J z W U W J o W Q Q Lu O N U) U)U) C, a C) Q a m m H z 0 -Waco m ao Y o w z C7 z Y 3 U ui a OJ O co 0 0 U uj Z O LL I - acn Z o � Q v cl W W a� U) J z W 0 W J U W Q Z O LL I - Oz O W J z - W W J O o W Q �VOCa�V � Lu H z 0 -Waco Q a (n `Z a OJ O J W LL U_ 0 ~ Z W 2 SHEET NUMBER � L103 3 A203 7. n 0 N N co 105'-0" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 3'-0" 21'-2" 17'-4" 15'-8" 26'-2" 3'-8" 18'-0" 27'4" 24'-0" 32'-0" 21'-8" / -- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - — -� I I f I l I I o�• b o 0 I 'JJ'J'J'J'�' 'J'J' TEWANT) 'STORAGE a ' ' 001 co 16 15 17 a 14 I BLG. MAINT.1 STOR. 1 I . • 01 �� / / GARAGE a " , 13 - �- X19— = • HALL CV MECH. 00 0����������� SERVICE 00 E EV. LOBBY > � � I�� TRASH/ A RECYCLING j 00 - - - A003 j &D ELEV. B >/ — < , oo �` a------ LL10—�- j -Z,-12 ----- ----- / 4 j 11 = 20 A202 , I , GARAGE 5 10 = B001 21 A202 1 A 005 3 A201 9 6 - co 9 - 22 5 CV I N i 8 - 23 i 6 _ JA202 = 2 _ l A202 ------.—. - 12 8 - g_----- 13'2" 18'-10" _ 24 —----•—•—•—•------------�� IF 0 12' 8" �r 16' 8" 24' 8" 6 = 25 4 9� 11 — _ a p MECH. 1 2 3 4 5 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 9 o _ GARAGE B00 ' I I a LG 48 47 46 45 44 43 T 42 41 40 71 39 38 37 , 36 35 34 ; 33 5'-8" ' 30 - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — -�• .5 1 A202 1 GARAGE FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL A100 SCALE: N.T.S. 0 O O 0 O / l 1 A106 0 0 O t► w U) z Q W U) 0 U 0 rillI— U) z 0 U of0 U— I--- 0 z MARK DATE DESCRIPTION m LU z Of cuLn M U)LO R�: LU v=2v) _ d y+ o o m LU OD Y M N S U c6 co U0C5 Z � 3 C'')') U') _2 co W co W C 0 m z � W Loo c 0 = LL J 0 W 0 Loo V w —w www Z � 0 0 m U m APRIL 1, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 GARAGE FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL A1 00 > cl,� N N �o cuLn U)LO v=2v) d y+ o o m O 0 00o OD Y M N S U c6 co U0C5 UI C6 N 3 C'')') U') _2 co W co W C <0 O LL1 J 0-0-M 0o� cn U) _L —w www N Qoz� 0 Q Lq W Q- U Z U z m O —o 3� > 0 < Qa ow1�w Q LU w O }Q 20 Q V Lm U) 0 Q=LUu) -� o�M� N J W Z 0 J C/)Q d UI J Lu Q Q 0 U O Of Q O cn w� Z Q � U) � m LLJQQ �oU) APRIL 1, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 GARAGE FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL A1 00 4 A203 U X al 0 U c 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0) C U) S 0 2 `0 a� U) 0 m U 0 CD0 M 2 co 2 3 TF 5 6 7 8 ------ ----------_ — --------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SI � I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I li I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ' 3 I A203 I 34-4- 134" 2' 8" 8'-8" 3-0" ' 22'-8" 20'-8" 22'-8" 21'-4 2T-4" I / 24'-0" II I I 32-0 � 19-4 � � I I 7 I A202 DIRECTORS MARKETING VEST I ° RES S VCS OFFICE OFFICE 1 ® I OFFICE 14 1 CONF. RM. 14 (j 141 I 1 HALL"14 r -F ST01 — STAIR B -, — - - I UU UU 11 - 13 WO KR U I M � OFFICE � 13 I LOBBY COMMONS .� ' STAFF RM. HALL 1 101 10 = I � UNIT'B' UNIT'B' _ 1 13 13 CL E1-1 -�-1 I+ -, o " UNIT'A' UNIT'B' UNIT'B' II 13 P�L - - - 10 10 10 10 10=_=J' UNIT'C' _ - 607 SF 607 SF 607 SF 111 I EF 1806 SF 607 SF --- ��� HALL I I I Ll 0 1 L _ ss9 SF MECH. RM. 13 Co. loo ool--il T I 13 r — o o I I MEICH. I cd 3 0 _ 1 --- ' HALL HALL M DINING I 11 , I I I ACTIVITY 10 o - 131 - - - - - I � ��L 1 - - C � II of o UNIT'D' TRASH —� o °�IL ' �' � � o of � 12 l 11 y x l l 1,026 SF , I, I x i UNIT'G' UNIT'B1' UNIT'B1' UNIT'F' UNIT'E' I I_ PRIVATE�� 1 l 1 I „SAI UNIT G 11 DINING BREAKFAST HALL „ 11 11 11 11 13 COUNTER LL 12 I 01 397 SF 585 SF 585 SF 718 SF 921 SF I HALL - - _ I ME F �C (GUEST SUITE) ® ® — Z®®� . 12 .------•--- IME o ° ' \\\ HALL _ •--------------------- `-------- ----- ' I 10 �. --- ,�------- ----- — ----- ------------- •------- _ ®- .---------•--------------------- _----- -- ®'- - 34'_4" 2T-8" � 38%0" DISHWASH MAIL _ - - - - - - - - - - I 2 14 HALL B10 _ I MARKET - M A201 10 101 I A202 ' I I A201 I �I C9 -CTIVITIES N I 5 OFF. QUIET RM. ' 12PREP 610 10 KITCHENI B13 I `� c B13 I I I N I I OFFICE ' I I B 1 3 I 6 HEARTH RM. ®° 2 I A202 I B10 � A202 45 4") 13'-1 112"� 16' 8 314 24'-8" 2'-0' 23'-4" 13'-2" y 8'-10" . ]� I I I SERVING STOR. 10 - v B13 _ T ' II - S"13 B13 �I NURS s 10 UNIT'H' UNIT'I' I � UNIT'M' _ STAIR C UNIT H5 ' � F-- 612 ,� TR 111 B11 I � B12-- B12 F 1 -_ ACTIVITY A108 7qN- - 443 SF o ® 494 SF 603 SF N 642 SF _ _ HALL B10 _" I �, I- 137 7c- 0 14� RY SPA _ MECH. R e1 I , 13 B1 1 b—D UNIT ,J, I - V B 11 HALL I q UNITL. - HALL ® 588 SF ' i C.0 co 'fn_11 12 � I M B12 - 613 SF ACTIVITY 12 LJ Lcl Lcl ' LO N �UNIT'H2' UNIT'H3' ADA � UNIT'H1' UNIT'K' , 1 UNIT'H4' UNIT'H2' UNIT'H3' ADA - UNIT'H4' STOR B11 B11 B11 B11 I 12 B 12 B12 B121 B11 � I 444 SF 443 SF 445 SF 453 SF 452 SF 441 SF 441 SF 702 SF IL — _ _I _ ! - - - - - - �� - - - I®I , O - - - - ISI - - - ---► r— u 165'-4" 1 ______._._._._._._._._._._____._._._._._.___._._.___._._.___._._...__ -........... .5 1 A202 01 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL A101 SCALE: 3132" = 1'-0" A107 N M N N 00 — \ C 0 0 N N 1 ► 1 MARK 1 I LLI U) CD Z orfU 0- 0 0 f� Cn 0 0 of 0 LL0 z DATE DESCRIPTION Date 1 Revision 1 Lu Z Of 0 3: ui ui tea= who a �o� r =tea �-w "-'www Q�z~ (D 0 Z ��WU) >o� o�0W Lu 0 Mof}Q owQ � 0 U) Z ZO Lu �- - Q�w� o��� Z j 0 J0 w wawa- Z�ww aLuLW oUo, <oo� zap cn w wpm LuaQ � o� APRIL 1, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL A1 01 v 0 Z z � Q Q _ gg V Z U w N O M � J 0 m o Z m M co �Z a`) > �_ > W tYN'Of- N M O J LL 0W 0 W LL z E V W O F— Z Z 0-000,w U O 0 Ora O tea= who a �o� r =tea �-w "-'www Q�z~ (D 0 Z ��WU) >o� o�0W Lu 0 Mof}Q owQ � 0 U) Z ZO Lu �- - Q�w� o��� Z j 0 J0 w wawa- Z�ww aLuLW oUo, <oo� zap cn w wpm LuaQ � o� APRIL 1, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL A1 01 v 0 N N cz �CD czu U m = 0 _ gg V Z U w N O M o 3 M U co cj o LL m M co �Z a`) > �_ > co V W mLU tYN'Of- tea= who a �o� r =tea �-w "-'www Q�z~ (D 0 Z ��WU) >o� o�0W Lu 0 Mof}Q owQ � 0 U) Z ZO Lu �- - Q�w� o��� Z j 0 J0 w wawa- Z�ww aLuLW oUo, <oo� zap cn w wpm LuaQ � o� APRIL 1, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL A1 01 EO 0 Q0 N 0 Q0 N 0 N a ti N �- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — ---------------- n4 �4 5 6 7 8 I I I I I I I I I I 3 A203 I I I I 6" 27'-4" 23'-0' 32'-0" 20'-4" 21'-8" 21'-8" 21'-8" 22'4" 33'-4" 13'4" I I fIrr r , -..r-i...i-i..., , r r I I ��-.f_-�...i-i...i- ...r .... ............... ... ..... .............. ... .. 7 A202 UNIT'B4' 7 I � _ 608 SF I �� � � � PUB/CLUB - ° �L L - � I I � I 000 20 I 2'-8" OQ-- -- -- - - �� - -- -- - �• - �� (� STAIR B T I ; co — - - CO UNIT'W' A20 C 23 , �� � 879 SF 77L UNIT'A' UNIT'B' UNIT'B' UNIT'B' UNIT'B' --- UNIT'C' 00 20 00 20 00 20 o Lzl 794 SF 607 SF 607 SF 607 SF 607 SIF 888 SF o HOUSEKEEPING7 FT= 31 LL Fo'JL , ®I C OO) OO 00 �O QO /� Oo 00 Ooo0 NE7> fXO A - /- I HALL FITNESS MECRM] j — AEll 23 01 _ — — -- F4 I C� HALL I o UNIT'B' E 22i. ,. E - O - — o 586 SF — LL — H. R6. — o o L _ 211 ' I.. UNIT '135' (1 HALL JAN. o0 001 (0°0 00 00� NIT'D' I22 E WO U 20 582 SF 2 2 w L� �- --� o A223 - Od 1,026 SF S AIR A UNIT'N' UNIT'B1' 7UNIT'Bl' UNIT'F' UNITE' 2, �_77 IT ELEV. 0 440 SF 583 SF 583 SF 784 SF 921 SF I� 22 I IAL TRASH ------------ 2 -�- -� ® ® ® I - — r 38'0" L 1 • ° _ in 4'-0' - 12' i" Q„ 9'-0" 13'-0" 9'-6" 12'-0" 9'-0" T-0 3/32" 9'-11 29/32" 2'-6" 12'-0'b o12' 0" 6-10" 6'-6" 16-129/32" 6-0 3/32" l �----•—•—•—•--------•—• f, —•—•—•—•----------86-0• " 33-4 27'-8" °0��L•—•—•—•-------------•—•—•—•--', ,. �------•—•-------------•o UNIT'B2' fi If—•------------� J B20 ° ' M I 2 597 SF I4 UNIT 'V' o°o _ _ - I A201", 864 SF A202 29— _ 0°0l • o o n o o o UNIT'B1' UNIT'B4' B22 B201 586 SF o 609 SF 5 HALL 000 � N A201 I I � � B20 -� o oO - j 6, � UNIT'134' B201 2 A202 609 SF A202 • • 0O0 � +� - _ L • ML I23'-4" 12'-2" 9'-10" UNIT 72 \ 13'-71/4" c? 15-83/4" 24'-8" 6" _ r 447 SF • STAIR C L� 1320 l II 021 ` • --- MECH. UNIT'P' ADA UNIT'Q' UNIT'133' 1 UNIT'133' UNIT'T1' SALON B20B207 B208 B20I A110 B22 B22 B22 710 SF 463 SF 677 SIF I 680 SF 460 SF --- — - 00 I00 I N ---- o°c OFFICE � j oc o0 150 - Tl,� - 00 T — SINK (:) \ , Q , 022 \ [ 4- L > F7100°o � G o°o ° • ` HALL HALL EF UNIT'R' o UNIT 'R1' co B21I B210 I 0 B21 L_ _ _ 623 SF 591 SF I� L. IL 5'-6 3/4" 00 Oc Oo 00 Oo / • Io0 0o Oc IT 0oi� • Ooc - Ll UNIT'U' UNIT'U1' UNIT'B' UNIT'T' UNIT'S' ' IB21 B21 1321 B21 B211 F 856 SF 892 SF 583 SF 476 SF 797 SF II _L_cj t'o_ I I 2'-6" 11'-10" 33'-5" 33'-5" 21'-8" 17'-8" 31'-4" 13'-0" 6' or 165'-4" / .D9 1 A202 1 SECOND A102 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL ti N %� J t► cl?N 00 �O O O \ O L U) 0 z U a_ 0 U U) z 0 U 0 LL I- 0 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION L z L.L 0 L L T� 3�C14 N N z to Ll) N (n N C, J 0 t1 Cn O - •U) 'N 00 0 0 Q z W N w M LO 0 F_ LL Ow O cn w v � Z _ L o J z Lu 0 0 Oo z F_ -w M U m T� 3�C14 N N cu LLO cu to Ll) N (n N C, V Z V t1 Cn O - •U) 'N 00 0 p 0 Q Y 24 R M LO > m W M W 7 i2 N ICE �Q0 0 W J � � H '_o(')Lu � � z F_ -w �w�w Q Z H W Z } U z m0 w c) q�>oa Q ow'mw w O � F_W LL 0w 0 z C O O = Q ZJ m W J z Q L d co zaz g�ww Q 0 z U O U) LLI W Q U) O m 0 >< �0W APRIL 1, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 SECOND FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL A1 02 bo 0 <.o N 0 co N M (p 3O 4 5 6 7 83 A203 �• — - — - „ — - — - .1 - — - — — - — - — - — — - — - — • — •�- — - - - — - — - — - — -�- — - — - — -�- — • — • — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — -' — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — -• — • — - — •� � 23 -0 32'-0" 20-4 21'-8" 21-8 21-8 22 -4 33-4 1374—" I I i 21'-11 1/4" ' - 21'-11 1/4" 20'-91/2" 8'-9 1/2" 8'm91/2" u c ACTIVITY/ MPR M M M M 30 6'-0" 6'-0" co 19 co 19 � STAIR B � � U I � ' STOR. UNIT'X' 33 UNIT'A' UNIT'B' UNIT'B' UNIT'B' UNIT'B' --- UNIT'C' 1 ao 32 T 30 30 30 30 - 30 30 �! 1,161 SF 864 SF 607 SF 607 SF 607 SF 607 SF 888 SF7— ' I 5'-6 314.. I El F ---- ' W 7 [] HALL, o c I o0 0 o O c - �� 33 °O � �5 °0 � o --- � ' 1 ° ° � 8'-811 N — MEC�i. RM. � F A= - i CHAPEL io1 Q[ ID CACI I - - — 3'-0" — 331 1 HALL 77 UNIT'B' 31 EJ 32 HALL o _ _ 580 SF D. N °°° II`oIF-I �5. vc `u 1 HALL — � �L — � — — to°ol� 321 %///� El — � ® 311 1 N - -EF m- '%' O 00 � O of O o 1 UNIT'B5' JAN. 0 00 (°o oo'� o°� � � — �I I 32 31rA _ UNIT D � I E WOM EL V l w C� 30 585 SF E III fl _ 32 3232 TO 1,027 SF , I � rRASH UNIT'N' UNIT'B1' UNIT'B1' UNIT'F' 17 UNIT'E' N 5 6 3/4 i U D �\' . A 31 31 31 31 31 ' 77 LAUNDR ELEV. "31�� 440 SF 585 SF 585 SF 718 SF 921 SF I _ � 32 32 � fl —•—•—•—•—•—• HAL _ - � - - � I ' — 1 •— — �® ® ® Q 1 F FTI Lu 1 1 11 38 -0 co M _ M -77' I o ole", a o �Ln �l I J \ 8' 61/4" 20'-101/4" o� 8'-61/4" ----------- — _----.�' - __ __ - __________ 1 11_.___22'0"_._. .�._._._._._._._. _. �4" _______ J—_—_ 27'_ 11 ------- — — — - 86 -0 � — -33 — - 8 r EFI.o°o 3-4 0 i UNIT'B2A' r B30 O° 604 SF co 2 4 UNIT'V' EF _ I A201 ' A202 � 0 ° ° 3 / B32 �I A201 i 790 SF i / 5 / 00, CD CD UNIT'131' UNIT'136' I B301 I B32 I 586 SF 609 SF 5 0 _ 01 — HALL 1:E °000 °° _0 A201 ` 5'-6 3/4" B30 °° N UNIT'B6' - 6 po, B30 2609 SF A202/ ® �bT 1 1 � " UNIT T3 8'-61/4 I 23'-4" 8' 6 1/4" 12'-2" 9' 10" B32 13'-71/4" O° 15'-8 3/4" 24'-8" 6" I 0 0 455 SFISE C. STAIR C L� -UP— B321 UNIT'Q' UNIT'133' / 1 1 _ A112 . UNIT'B3' UNIT'T1' p MECH. RM. UNIT'P' ADA B30 B30 B32 - g32 B30 - B30 464 SF 675 SF I _ ] 680 SF 468 SF 710 SF LIBRARY - ai 0iB32 S \ 100 o I `� — — \/ 7571 0 00 00 FB30�00 ; -� I -)C7_1 L14, 0.0 00 00 5'-6 3/4" i cd i G II UNIT'R1' `'�°o�� HALL HALL �� °y UNIT 'R' L' o r =Io N co B31 B31 331 331 627 SF — 591 SF- co I A_ I --I [4- PD G L — — — 6'-11/2" p � 00 C) � �o 00 00 0 0o i � a X00 0°1 �,o° 7-- °° - i _EE I N / 21-011 UNIT'U' UNIT'U1' UNIT'B' UNIT'T' UNIT'S' �1 B31 B31 B31 13311j B311 i F 856 SF 892 SF 584 SF 475 SF 793 SF IV\ . r M M M 1.9 19 O c I8'-61 /4" 8'-61 /4" I • l` 8_ 2'-6" 11'-10" 33'-5" 33'-5" 21'-8" 17'-8" 31'-4'" 13-0" 6" .. — . — - . — . — . — . — . — . — . — . — ... — . — . — . — . — . — . — . — • — — - — - — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - L - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — — - — - — - — - — -�. 165'-4" .5 9 1 A202 1 THIRD FLOOR PLAN — OVERALL Al 03 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" �o 0 N 0 <.o N L1 U) (D Z U 0� a_ 0 U U) Z 0 U 0 LL 0 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION Lu �z L.L 0 Lu L.L W L.L N co M O U) Lu z z_ O J W U H M O m T 30� Z �X) U)Lc) — a N U)43) 0 I.L J O m Z I♦♦.LI 00 O M V♦ O R rn O r O y N N — CO LL 0 W Of V W N 'w Z O 0 M U N co M O U) Lu z z_ O J W U H M O m T 30� N CV o �X) U)Lc) — a N U)43) N V Z V „? t1 Cn OU In N OO 00 O M O R rn O r Y 2 y N N — CO ' C6 .@M @ L) C) R C/) 75 N LtLL _ M L" : 127 L" W M W t:� N 'w F_Q� 0 W J � � H 0 � w� �c/) �Z CDw Lu W W Q Z H W Z } U Z m0 ��wc,) >Oa ww 0of W w ow _ F_ LL v o�Qo Q �Z 0 LL,0=00 NZ J W � z Q wz az M g��� Q 0 Z U O U) LL1Q z Lu Of m 0Qa �0 APRIL 1, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 THIRD FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL A1 03 7. n 00 N CD CA N N co i u \ +5.25" c +4.75" \ +7.75" /. SLOPE INSUL. 1/8": FT. +7.75 J F--: =) LL c Z W LL O J Cn OVERFLOW DRAIN +2" ROOF \ DRAIN +0" J U) Z � W L_ 0- 0 U +7.25 - - +7.75" SLOPE INSUL. 1/8" : FT. +7.75 +4.75" A SLOPE INSUL. 1/8": FT. +7.75 J U) Z � W LL LZ - O v J � Cn OVERFLOW \N +2.. ROOF DRAIN +0" - n J � Ll Z W CL O cn +7.75 SLOPE INSUL. 1/8": FT. �I i / +5.75" 1 ROOF PLAN ®® A104 SCALE: N.T.S. MARK DATE DESCRIPTION v > N N ti O c6 Cn CC) LL C C U U U = C N C V 2V C/)O 0 CO O 0 O� 0 _ C 3: OC3) CD 3 CM'') _� j L2 W M W C Q' CV ~ (Y Q 0 O O Lu cn =CD Q H — W LU u w Q z < O Uz U cwn W z CO o <Lq >[ifOco < Q>oa =�� Z W w�ft! O � Lul LL O Q Q O Q z o c_ z O 0 Q=LU� c� NLU Z J 0 W J Q IL Lu z Wcl) III Q J � Q 0 U O c/) ^ QO�� c/ )U) W 0 U) C/) u!LUCn W U wum � � J Q W Q Q O U 0 UAPRIL 1, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 U) ROOF PLAN Z 0 U O LL 0 Al 04 Z L Z ry LU ry L ry Z_ Z J 0 0 m Z � W N c M 0 J L.L 0 O cn W W V Z LLUo Z J Z � � 0 00 m U m v > N N ti O c6 Cn CC) LL C C U U U = C N C V 2V C/)O 0 CO O 0 O� 0 _ C 3: OC3) CD 3 CM'') _� j L2 W M W C Q' CV ~ (Y Q 0 O O Lu cn =CD Q H — W LU u w Q z < O Uz U cwn W z CO o <Lq >[ifOco < Q>oa =�� Z W w�ft! O � Lul LL O Q Q O Q z o c_ z O 0 Q=LU� c� NLU Z J 0 W J Q IL Lu z Wcl) III Q J � Q 0 U O c/) ^ QO�� c/ )U) W 0 U) C/) u!LUCn W U wum � � J Q W Q Q O U 0 UAPRIL 1, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 U) ROOF PLAN Z 0 U O LL 0 Al 04 Z a L0 L0 N N r rn 0 N 04 N LL0 PREFINISHED METAL HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING HARDI LAP SIDING CAP FLASHING SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK TOP OF PARAPET FASTENERS, TYP. �J 135-0" T.O. ROOF TRUSS ti I f II `! 133'-2 1/2" a a a GENERAL NOTE: 1. COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGN/BUILD MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS ALL REQUIRED OPENINGS NOT INDICATED HEREIN. (:D 7 6 5 4 3 NICHIHA WOOD 2 1 HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING j PANEL TYPE 1 SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK j PREFINISHED METAL PREFINISHED 5"X5" 1X6 HARDI TRIM PREFINISHED 5"X5" 42" HIGH ALUMINUM 1X4 HARDI TRIM FASTENERS, TYP. 24" HIGH ALUMINUM HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING CAP FLASHING GUTTER, TYP. GUTTER, TYP. RAILING, TYP. LETTERS SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK FASTENERS, TYP. �F I/ THIRD FLOOR WEEI 1� �� ® mm ����� ME - i- Ll 122'-8" = I =1 = 1 = =1 = I =1 1= =1 = — — I I - I 1 — =1 I 1= - _ .._ i. I I- -• 4 I 'I i 'i =I •II- - - - — , i II. I II - _ i _II. I I. I= __ i i - i � I I _ HARDI LAP SIDING _ Iit IIII ILJLJI-� - --- -_ SECOND FLOOR v 111'-8° - I = ' I — I = = I p I fEE-- -- ' I - FIRST FLOOR E - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - v 100'-0" 01 NORTH ELEVATION A201 SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" J H G F 1X4 HARDI TRIM PRE -FINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING, TYP. TOP OF PARAPET 135-0" - F=4—II r I�� L I I I T.O. ROOF TRUSS; / 133'-2 1/2" 42" HIGH ALUM. RAILING, TYP. q q I I aaaaaaaa IIIIII I I III I --- — �� THIRD FLOOR HARDI LAP SIDING I I I s I II I ' I I I I SECOND FLOOR n 1111 -811 I FRST FLOOR � _, 0101-01 I I r Jim - - - P -TAC GRILL, TYP. D (EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" I HARDI TRIM FASCIA xroq/ I` - 0 ASPHALT SHINGLES HARDI SOFFIT AND r FASCIA - PREFINISHED 5"X5" t GUTTER, TYP. / W I PREFINISHED 5"X4" J DOWNSPOUT, TYP. — - HARDI COLUMN 00� BUILDOUT a ARCH.PRECAST _ — — — CONCRETE CAP � J MAGIC PAK LOUVERS 6" ARCH. PRECAST CONC. MANUFACTURED PRE -FINISHED MTL. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS, TYP. JAMB AND HEAD TRIM STONE VENEER, TYP. WHERE SHOWN (TIE DOWNSPOUTS TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PER CIVIL) * PROVIDE HEAT TAPE IN ALL GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS E D c6 A ANDERSON 100 SERIES WINDOWS PREFINISHED 5"X4" HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING 1X6 HARDI TRIM 1X4 HARDI TRIM ELEVATOR ROOF BEYOND 1X6 HARDI TRIM HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING DOWNSPOUT, TYP. PREFINISHED METAL SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK I1X4 HARDI TRIM SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK PREFINISHED 5"X5" CAP FLASHING FASTENERS,TYP. rrI J II I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o I q I I q q I I I I I I I I I II mammai I I I I I ------------ I I I I I I I I I I it li it I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .� HHHHHH I''(I_II_II_III ' - „- I I I I I C 7 - I I I I I I I I a I I I I I � I PRE -FINISHED MTL. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS, TYP. HARDI SOFFIT AND WHERE SHOWN (TIE DOWNSPOUTS TO THE STORM FASCIA DRAINAGE SYSTEM PER CIVIL) * PROVIDE HEAT TAPE IN ALL GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK ANDERSON 100 1X6 HARDI TRIM PREFINISHED METAL 1X4 HARDI TRIM FASTENERS, TYP. jk�TAOP OF PARAPET SERIES WINDOWS CAP FLASHING / 135-0" T.O. ROOF TRUSS 133'-2 1/211 Ljlk THIRD FLOOR------- ®/ 122'-811 — - - I ASPHALT SHINGLES ARCH.PRECAST CONCRETE CAP PREFINISHED 5"X5" GUTTER, TYP. PRE -FINISHED MTL. PREFINISHED 5"X4" CAP FLASHING, TYP. DOWNSPOUT, TYP. HARDI LAP SIDING 1X4 HARDI TRIM I I I I I - -� it I I I _ I p _ I I I I • II , _ = II . � � I . . I = I I I II • II I I 11 • II ; -- �-- - all, I I I I SCO 00 E ND FL R ++= I I I I I I I I I I I 1 - 11 1 8" I I I I I I I I ------------ 7-7 FIRST ; FLOOR *7100,-o if I -I(lV VI\ILL, I I I . D(PARTIAL SE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" ARCH.PRECAST CONCRETE CAP MAGIC PAK LOUVERS MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER UTILITY BRICK FASTENERS, TYP. GUTTER, TYP. D r® E— NICHIHA00 W D PANEL i . TYPE 1 HARDI TRIM FASCIA BALLASTED EPDM ROOF I I I I I a q P I I I I I � INC 1 I F I 1 I I I II I I a a a I II I I _ I — f- I r I MAGIC PAK LOUVERS UTILITY BRICK HARDI LAP SIDING PRE -FINISHED MTL. GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS VENEER, TYP. (PROVIDE SPLASH BLOCK AT GRADE) HARDICOLUMN BUILDOUT PRECAST CONCRETE CAP MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER HARDI -1 • HARDIMETAL 1 .HARDI • 11 CAP FLASHING .-D 1. ALUMINUM •' • PARAPET SERIES WINDOWS RAILING, TYP.1 T.O. ROOF TRUSS/ THIRD FLOOR =F�F Fli SECOND FLOOR FIRST• • R j ='�--- �� � =� 1001-01, ARCH.PRECAST 1 11, UTILITY BRICK CONCRETE CAP STONE 4 PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION A201 SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF 6 'INS t NUM R. 22976 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION i J 0 I� O Q Z W W J N co M an O 0 m J � J H w Z W Z V Q � � = o Z CV LIJ O � co Z G m m ,'I- C) cu > c N N c:) O c5 Ln Cn ICS d C 9 In In N C _ 0o 5 in o -N� 0 0� 0 0 m i Y M N y In 'IT Wa cu"� M U)m co C� o U O° " Z 11 3 C'M') � Ifs j Ln a) Ifs co W co W C Q' N E~ Q 0 0 �I�_ �0 �� z H W WW W Qoz< U} U W Z m UO) 3:L�U) F__ Q>oa uL) L V } oQQ� 0 U Z ZO O Q=ou) C7 U — U — Z J W — J W a J<-� W L �Q0 VJ U o Of Q o m (n W Z Q Lu W � m L.L LLJ < W 0U) 0 UMAY 23, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 ry U) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Z 0 U 0 LL A2010 Z O 1x4 HARDI TRIM TOP OF PARAPET 135-0" T.O. ROOF TRUS,`�/ r r -I• I 133'-2 1/2" I HARDI LAP SIDING THIRD FLOOR 122'-8" I I I I I I i i SECOND FLOOR 111'-8" I I I i I I I I 4IIiiil� FIRST FL00 100'-0" 4 5 HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK FASTENERS, TYP. PRE -FINISHED METAL 1X6 HARDI TRIM CAP FLASHING, TYP. I I I I � I I d d I p Llfli _ 1 _ I — i I = I - I ' 7 1X4 HARDI TRIM 42" HIGH ALUMINUM RAILING, TYP. I / I , I I C I 1 I I I I I i DI: I I a I I d I 11 .. C I I I I I I I ' ' I TI I T I I I I I I I I I I 8 -- HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK FASTENERS, TYP. MAGIC I I I / I I II / I I I / I I I: LLL®� I I I I ' I 1 I li I I I I ----------: I PAW I I I I I a i i p I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I d l I p I I- I I I I I I I 1= �— PREFINISHED 5"X5" GUTTER, TYP. PREFINISHED 5"X4" DOWNSPOUT, TYP. ANDERSON 100 SERIES WINDOWS p l I I I I I I �IIII IIIII I I I I I I I I { I I I I 01 SOUTH ELEVATION A202 SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" 1 TOP OF PARAPET k� 135-0" T.O. ROOF TRUS,S� 133'-2 1/2" IlleTHIRD FLOOR 122'-8" SECOND FLOOR 111'-8" G� MFLOOR " GARAGE FLOOR 88'-8" Fr_ HARDI TRIM FASCIA BALLASTED EPDM ROOF I / I — 3 WEST ELEVATION A202 SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" Ivl/llvurnv I Ur\LL/ nr\vl I. r r\LVMJ I u I ILI I I Dr\Ivf\ r- I M, STONE VENEER CONCRETE CAP VENEER, TYP. GRILLS, TYP. Ljlk TOP OF PARAPET 135-0" T.O. ROOF TRUSS 133'-2 1/2" Lk THIRD FLOOR %-'-1-224811 SECOND FLOOR 111'-8" FIRST FLOOR `J 100'-0" 8 42" HIGH ALUMINUM PREFINISHED 5"X5" PREFINISHED 5"X4" PREFINISHED METAL RAILINGM, TYP. GUTTER, TYP. DOWNSPOUT, TYP. CAP FLASHING, TYP. HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK r� !, FASTENERS, TYP. \ W ANDERSON 100 SERIES WINDOWS 1X4 HARDI TRIM ='O HARDI LAP SIDING E-1 WL ILA 1X6 HARDI TRIM =1 1= I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I — I I - I I I I I D (MEMORY CARE NE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER UTILITY BRICK VENEER, TYP. ARCH.PRECAST CONCRETE CAP P -TAC GRILLS A B C D E F G H J PREFINISHED 5"X5" HARDI TRIM FASCIA 24" HIGH ALUMINUM HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING GUTTER, TYP. ELEVATOR ROOF BEYOND HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING ANDERSON 100 HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING 1X6 HARDI TRIM 1X4 HARDI TRIM PREFINISHED METAL LETTERS SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK PREFINISHED 5"X4" � � SERIES WINDOWS SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK CAP FLASHING FASTENERS, TYP. ` DOWNSPOUT, TYP. FASTENERS, TYP. FASTENERS, TYP. \ I► �rI /� / I II II I I I II II iT� I NICHIHA WOOD PANEL �IIIIIIII c AM ]Oo�1�OCOOLOo - I �� - all TYPE 1 – __ i\ I I ASPHALT SHINGLES I – i I = I = – – HARDI LAP SIDING HARDI SOFFIT AND RAILING, FASCIA _ _ _ _ v v _ - _ – I /' 42" HIGH ALUMINUM YP. LN HARDI COLUMN _ – - _ - - - - - _ - - _ - _ _ - _ _ _. - __ - _ _ _ _. - _ _ - - - - - - _ _ - _ _ _. - _ - _ _ - I I HARDI COLUMN • _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ `1 I BUILDOUT BUILDOUT ; i l [ = = PRECAST CONCRETE _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ – UN kCAP - -_ p - p p - - _ - -. - _ - /' I = _ – _ ° ' p I ARCH. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER — --_ – - ( _�, h MANUFACTURED VENEER STONE 'LL r MANUFACTURED ALUMINUM DOOR – 6" ARCH. PRECAST CONC. HARDI LAP SIDING ARCH. PRECAST UTILITY BRICK MODULAR BLOCK L STONE VENEER AND FRAME HEADER AND JAMB CONCRETE CAP VENEER, TYP. RETAINING WALL PREFINISHED PIPE BOLLARD MODULAR BLOCK OVERHEAD DOOR RETAINING WALL 30 3 4 E HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING 42" HIGH ALUMINUM SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK RAILING, TYP. PREFINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING FASTENERS, TYP. 1X6 HARDI TRIM PREFINISHED METAL MAGIC PAK LOUVERS ANDERSON 100 HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING CAP FLASHING SERIES WINDOWS TOP OF PARAPET �,� � TOP OF PARAPET SYSTEM W/p 135-10" COUNTERSUNK 135-0" I j T.O. ROOF TRUSS I 1 - FASTENERS, TYP. T.O. ROOF TRUSS 1331 -2 1/2" ANDERSON 100 133'-2 1/2" - / SERIES WINDOWS \ 42" HIGH ALUMINUM ° ° r RAILING, TYP. 1X4 HARDI TRIM 1X4 HARDI TRIM -_ - , l THIRD FLOOR �� THIRD FLOOR 122,-$„ – �/ 1X6 HARDI TRIM 122,-$„ – ti HARDI LAP SIDING I I 1x4 HARDI TRIM HARDI LAP SIDING HARDI COLUMN_ BUILDOUT SECOND FLOOR MANUFACTURED – STONE VENEER SECOND FLOOR 111'-8" 111'-8" - �II 11� = _ ARCH.PRECAST CONCRETE CAP FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" ARCH. PRECF CONCRETE H ARCH. PRECF CONCRETE SILL 4 PARTIAL SW ELEVATION A202 SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" UTILITY BRICK VENEER, TYP. D 01 J I lllvL V LIVLLr\ vVlvvr\L I L. vr%r- (PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" 4 .5 HARDI "REVEAL" SIDING ANDERSON 100 SYSTEM W/ COUNTERSUNK PREFINISHED METAL 42" HIGH ALUMINUM SERIES WINDOWS – FASTENERS, TYP. CAP FLASHING RAILING, TYP. �1 TOP OF PARAPET 1350 1 T.O. ROOF TRUSS 133'-2 1/2" 4 -/ 1X4 HARDI TRIM THIRD FLOOR 122'-8" 1 I: � I I I I I I I I I I I a i i o i o HARDI LAP SIDING SECOND FLOOR O 111'-8" 1X6 HARDI TRIM I I I I I I I I I I I � I I FIRST FLOOR t 100'-0" P -TAC GRILLS, TYP. UTILITY BRICK VENEER, TYP. MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER - 6 MEMORY CARE NW ELEVATION A202 SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" PRECAST CONCRETE CAP PREFINISHED METAL B A CAP FLASHING HARDI SOFFIT AND FASCIA 1 TOP OF PARAPET \ 135'-0" I I I I T.O. ROOF TRUSS _ 1 1 _ J 133'-2 1/2" - NICHIHA WOOD PANEL TYPE 1 t THIRD FLOOR � - -�• — _- - � i - ;- -- - I ' 122'-8" ANDERSON 100 SERIES WINDOWS ASPHALT SHINGLES HARDI SOFFIT AND FASCIA EL SECOND FLOOR'S , 111-8 II I ARCH.PRECAST CONCRETE CAP UTILITY BRICK VENEER, TYP. �► FIRST FLOOR J 100'-0" D (EAST ENTRY SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF 6 'INS t NUM R. 22976 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION i v 0 CU > c N N c:) O c6 Ln Cn LC) U) !n N 0 2 VO V C�5 O R0 cc) Y M N L) u Wa cu .Fu co LIL U) N N 3 C'M') � !f2 j co W co W Q0 0 X01 �o� �� z w Luww Q Z H U 0 } U W> 0< Q>oa 0 Lu Lu wwo� ¢ U U Q O Q z o U<)z o O Q=ou) co oo� '2E 0-1 Z J 0 W J cn J��' LLI a �� c oa�� U o Q o L c/)9 C/) w zQLu C/) � m Lu 0w - . Lu o U) Z 0 UMAY 23, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Z 0 U 0 IL 0 A202 Z w 0 L10 O Q Z Lu W J N M O m J � J H W Z W r Z V Q � O Z CVLU O � co Z G m m v 0 CU > c N N c:) O c6 Ln Cn LC) U) !n N 0 2 VO V C�5 O R0 cc) Y M N L) u Wa cu .Fu co LIL U) N N 3 C'M') � !f2 j co W co W Q0 0 X01 �o� �� z w Luww Q Z H U 0 } U W> 0< Q>oa 0 Lu Lu wwo� ¢ U U Q O Q z o U<)z o O Q=ou) co oo� '2E 0-1 Z J 0 W J cn J��' LLI a �� c oa�� U o Q o L c/)9 C/) w zQLu C/) � m Lu 0w - . Lu o U) Z 0 UMAY 23, 2019 PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Z 0 U 0 IL 0 A202 Z TOP OF PARAPET 135-0" T.O. ROOF TRUSS 133'-2 1/2" THIRD FLOOR 122'-8" ECOND FLOOR 111'-8" jk FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" 01 ENTRY PERSPECTIVE A203 SCALE: N.T.S. 3 NORTH ELEVATION A203 SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" 04 WEST ELEVATION A203 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" TOP OF PARAPET 135'-0" T.O. ROOF TRUSS 133'-2 1/2" jk THIRD FLOOR 122'-8" SECOND FLOOR 111'-8" FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" GARAGE FLOOR 88'-8" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF 6I N S TA. NUIM R. 22976 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION J � > 3 N N o O Q d c c 43) V Z V V fn O Z W 0 0 �i M W J N co w � M O 0 CO ; > Lf) J W N U) J H w Z W z V Q � = o Z cN LU O rl%_Z rn m �Q0 Lu J O d d H 0 0-O �� z LD Lu Luww 0 Z } 0 z_ m o W W C/) >0 Wm� w� '� 0 0Qa� z �� 00 oFn Of z_j0of LJ �Qof0- zaz gLLEVW o¢O� z o O 0 U) LLI zQC/) U)wm W Of J 0 Q Q LL O c/) UMAY 0 > 3 N N o Q U) n Lcl d c c 43) V Z V V fn O •�'N 00 0 0 �i M 0 aU � Q � Y v � ql N N = CO •@ M R Cn (B N LLZ�v Vf6 pU00 I 0 3 cc M Lf) ; > Lf) W M W W N �Q0 Lu J O d d H 0 0-O �� z LD Lu Luww 0 Z } 0 z_ m o W W C/) >0 Wm� w� '� 0 0Qa� z �� 00 oFn Of z_j0of LJ �Qof0- zaz gLLEVW o¢O� z o O 0 U) LLI zQC/) U)wm W Of J 0 Q Q LL O c/) UMAY Lq w Q PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 U O COLORED EXTERIOR N � LLI U) N a W I 0 �Q0 Lu J O d d H 0 0-O �� z LD Lu Luww 0 Z } 0 z_ m o W W C/) >0 Wm� w� '� 0 0Qa� z �� 00 oFn Of z_j0of LJ �Qof0- zaz gLLEVW o¢O� z o O 0 U) LLI zQC/) U)wm W Of J 0 Q Q LL O c/) UMAY 23, 2019 ry PROJECT No: 08-1866.00 Cn COLORED EXTERIOR Z ELEVATIONS 0 U O LL A2030 z 2 0 U 0. z LU m U) 0 0 a a Cl) z U) J 0 CL Q W z z 0 0 CO 7) U) T W Z) z W a a z W x 0 wsb May 30, 2019 Matt Leonard City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Monticello Senior Living Site Plan Review City Project No. 2019-100 WSB Project No. R-012792-000 Dear Mr. Leonard: We have reviewed the civil plans and stormwater management plan dated April 1, 2019 as prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and offer the following comments: Site Plan Wright County plans to re -stripe CSAH 39 in 2020 to include a center left turn lane from Hart Blvd to the east in 2020. This will remove through left turning vehicles from the current though lane to improve traffic flow, roadway efficiency and reduce rear -end collisions. The center turn lane will also address the merging traffic issue on eastbound CSAH 39 east of Hart Boulevard by reducing the thru lane traffic from two lanes to one lane to accommodate a center left turn lane. Wright County's project also includes pavement rehabilitation and it is not planned or warranted to include any intersection improvements at Hart Blvd. The crash history at the intersection of County 39 and Hart Boulevard does not pose a concern at this time. City staff will discuss with the County, installation of dynamic speed signs or other devices to control speed if it is deemed necessary. 2. Removal of the trees along CSAH 39 within the site, will likely improve sight lines at the intersection of Hart Blvd. It is not anticipated that there will be a need for turn lanes or other operational improvements on Hart Boulevard based on the traffic generated from the site. The proposed accessing spacing aligns with existing access points on the west side of Hart Boulevard to aid in eliminating turning conflicts. 4. Include typical sections for the trail and parking areas including heavy duty concrete and bituminous pavements. The access drive along the site is to be used for fire truck access, staff will confirm if the 16 -foot width is acceptable. The pavement design shall be provided and confirm that it is adequate for fire truck loading. Detail should be provided as any impacts to the proposed adjacent retaining wall. KA012792-000\Admin\Docs\040819 Submittal\Ltr-m-leonard Senior Living Review-053018.docx Monticello Senior Living May 30, 2019 Page 2 6. ADA compliant pedestrian ramps shall be constructed at the corner of Hart Blvd and CSAH 39 where the proposed trail/sidewalk connects. 7. Show the existing utilities. 8. Label the boulevard widths between Hart Blvd and the proposed sidewalk. The maximum boulevard grade is 4%. Grading Plan 9. The existing home located on Hart Blvd immediately east of the site shows a ground surface elevation of 931.3 according to the ALTA survey. The City design guidelines require at least 2 feet of freeboard between the pond's HWL and the low opening of adjacent homes. This requirement is currently not met and the applicant shall provide solutions to meeting this requirement. 10. Label the HWL for the infiltration pond on the grading plan. 11. Label the EOF for the infiltration basin and the entrance to the underground parking area on the plan sheet. 12. Provide the building basement elevation, the plan shows 953.03, which is incorrect and higher than the FIFE elevation. 13. Underground parking is proposed for the site and does not appear to have a positive overland EOF route. Consideration shall be given in the design such that the garage area will not be at risk of frequent flooding. It's recommended that trench drains, a sump pump system and secondary containment of the 100 year runoff volume be considered in the design. 14. Retaining walls over 4 feet in height require a railing at the top of the wall and shall be designed and certified by a licensed professional engineer. The material type and color should be identified. 15. Identify the slope grades in the green areas. City requires a maximum 4:1 slope. 16. A profile of the trail slope shall be provided and designed to meet comply with ADA requirements. 17. ADA complaint sidewalk and pedestrian ramp grade details shall be shown to include providing a 2% maximum cross slope for the pedestrian route across the proposed driveways. Storm Sewer Plan 18. Provide details on how existing storm sewer manhole (STR-25) will be modified given grade changes and existing pipes to be removed/added. 19. All flared -end sections shall include grouted riprap per City specifications. 20. Sheet piling, per City detail 4008, shall be provided at the FES's entering the pond. Monticello Senior Living May 30, 2019 Page 3 Stormwater Manaqement Plan 21. Verify that the stormwater calculations include the future addition and any future parking areas. 22. The regional stormwater pond that this site drains to was designed to provide an infiltration volume for 2.2 acres of impervious from this site. This site proposes to add 2.073 acres of impervious, therefore the water quality requirements from this site are met with the use of the regional pond. 23. The site design must incorporate rate control onsite to match existing rates. The applicant is proposing the use of an infiltration basin in the southeast corner of the site to meet rate control. An overall rate reduction from the site is met. 24. Pretreatment is required prior to discharge into an infiltration basin. A sump manhole is proposed at STR-14 however the 4 -foot sump depth should be based on the outlet elevation to the pond (SE). 25. An infiltration rate of 0.45 inches per hour has been used in the pond calculations, this equates to an allowable infiltration depth of 1.8 feet in 48 hours. The basin depth of 1.0 feet will drawdown within 48 hours. 26. Soil classifications from the geotechnical investigation can be used for preliminary design purposes, however confirmation infiltration testing of the constructed systems will be required. 27. Soils that have infiltration rates greater than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. 28. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design for the 10 -year storm event and connection to the existing storm sewer system. Calculations should adhere to the following guidelines: a. The rational method runoff coefficient (c) is designated by land use and should be assigned a value no less than 0.7. b. Minimum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 3.0 fps c. Maximum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 12.0 fps 29. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 30. A stormwater maintenance agreement will be required. A template will be provided to the applicant. HvdroCAD Model 31. Update model for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events with an MSE3 type distribution 2 -yr (2.84"), 10 -yr (4.22"), 100 -yr (6.87"), 10 -day snowmelt (7.2") Monticello Senior Living May 30, 2019 Page 4 32. In the HydroCAD model the directly connected impervious should be modeled as separate, not a weighted CN. 33. HydroCAD model area for existing (5.020 acres) and proposed (5.995 acres) do not match, please revise to model the same areas. 34. Existing HydroCAD model uses C soils and the proposed model is using B soils. Please confirm the soil type and make it consistent for both models. 35. HydroCAD model, Pond 4P the 48" grate device's invert elevation is inaccurate please correct this. 36. HydroCAD model, add a starting elevation for Pond 4P to reflect the elevation of the outlet pipe. Utilitv Plan 37. The plans call for excavating into Hart Blvd to tie into the existing watermain and extending two new 8 -inch water services to the site. Confirm that the existing 6 -inch watermain stubs to the site cannot be utilized to maintain adequate pressures and fire flows. The applicant indicated that a fire flow test was completed to determine this. 38. The applicant's engineer has indicated that the sanitary sewer connections are proposed to connect to the existing sanitary sewer to the rear of the lot and not extend from Hart Boulevard as shown on the plans. Further review comments will be provided once the plans are updated. An outside drop section per City detail plate 3002 shall be provided in the plans for these connections. 39. Identify the existing sanitary sewer manhole modifications due to grade changes. It appears the manhole along CSAH 39 will be located in the proposed trail. 40. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. 41. The contractor shall apply for a utility excavation permit from Public Works prior to connecting to or modifications to City utilities. 42. Irrigation plans should be providing with the building permit submittal for review. Civil Details 43. Include MnDOT pedestrian ramp details. 44. Include outside drop section for sanitary manhole detail no. 3002. 45. Include trash guard for end section detail plate no. 4007 46. Include piling for flared end section detail plate no. 4008 47. Include "utility excavation in city streets 5 years or older" detail plate no. 7006 for street patching if determined necessary based on watermain connection needs as noted above. Monticello Senior Living May 30, 2019 Page 5 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan/SWPPP 48. For the proposed infiltration area, include information in the SWPPP that the infiltration area will not be excavated to final grade until the contributing drainage area has been stabilized. In addition, rigorous erosion prevention and sediment controls must be implemented to keep all runoff and sediment out of the infiltration practice. (Part 16.4) 49. Include estimated quantities for all proposed temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control practices. (Part 5.7) 50. Specify what type of erosion control blanket is proposed on the plan sheets. (Part 5.5) 51. Provide detail for proposed check dams. (Part 5.5) 52. Specify temporary and permanent stabilization methods for all exposed soils on the plan sheets. (Part 5.5) 53. Specify how the normal wetted perimeter of the last 200 feet of the temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale will be stabilized within 24 hours of connecting to a surface water or property edge in the plan sheets. (Part 8.6) 54. Specify in the SWPPP that the dewatering plan must include BMPs to prevent sediment transport, erosion, and adverse impacts to downstream receiving waters. In addition, the dewatering plan must include any specific chemical treatments that will be used. (Part 10.2-10.5) 55. Specify maintenance and inspection requirements to be consistent with the NPDES CSW Permit Parts 11.2-11.11 in the SWPPP. (Part 11.2-11.11) 56. Add inlet protection to the catch basins on west side of Hart Blvd adjacent fronting the site. 57. Add perimeter protection such as bioroll around infiltration basin. 58. The proposed development falls within the DNR Wild and Scenic River District for the Mississippi River and must incorporate best management practices (BMPs) in accordance with the NPDES/SDS stormwater permit for construction and be identified in the SWPPP. Landscape Plan 59. Proposed landscaping shall be adjusted so that it does not block the EOF route and not interfere with access and maintenance of existing and proposed utilities. Confirm that the proposed landscaping onsite along CSAH 39 will provide adequate sight lines for vehicles existing Hart Boulevard into CSAH 39. Other 60. Add a note that all construction shall conform to the City's General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction, dated April 2017, located on the City's website, Engineering Department. Monticello Senior Living May 30, 2019 Page 6 61. The applicant shall enter into an encroachment agreement for the retaining wall and fire access drive that is proposed within the drainage and utility easement. The City will provide the agreement for the applicant's review. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 612-360-1304 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Sincerely, WSB IA�- - t. �.OPLI Shibani K. Bisson, PE Senior Project Manager Jt4T Y 0" U � Z April 2019 W p RE: CSAH 39 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION AND RESTRIPING ?a ,d'y 7E3 55 Wright County applied for and was selected to receive Highway Safety Improvement funding for safety improvements along the CSAH 39 corridor from Hart Blvd in Monticello to O'Dean Ave NE in Otsego. Work will include pavement preservation and re -striping for a continuous two-way center Wright County left -turn lane (TWLTL). The project will also include minor widening at intersections to maintain Highway Department existing right -turn lanes. All work will be done within the existing right-of-way. 3600 Braddock Ave NE Buffalo, MN 55313 The continuous TWLTL will provide spatial separation between opposing lanes of traffic, reducing head on collisions. In addition, due to the density of driveways, restriping will also remove left Ph: (763)682-7383 turning vehicles from the through lane; improving flow, road efficiency and reducing rear -end Fax: (763)682-7313 collisions. VIRGIL HAWKINS, P.E. EXISTING CSAH 39 TYPICAL SECTION Highway Engineer I CHAD HAUSMANN, P.E. 2 12 12' 2 rS.LC=,_THRU WJE THANE �11 Assistant Highway Engr. 111 -I STEVE MEYER Maintenance ' 1. Superintendent 1 1 i< 44' >i JEREMY CARLSON, P.L.S. Right -of -Way Agent i 1 i PROPOSED CSAH 39 TYPICAL SECTION 1 SARA BUERMANN, P.E. i Traffic Engineer —'2 -� 11' 1c' 11' ¢ _g 2' SHED•I THRU LANE BUFFER LnNE I THRU —E ISHLD- 10' WIDTH AT RIGHT TURN LANES I The work east of CSAH 19 to O'Dean Ave NE will begin late summer 2019 and will be done under traffic. Motorists may encounter delays as the road is reduced intermittently to a single lane during daytime hours. Work will continue west of CSAH 19 in 2020. The more extensive pavement preservation project will require a detour in 2020. If there are any questions, please contact Chad Hausmann, Assistant Highway Engineer, chausmannna,co.wrieht.mn.us, 763-682-7387. An Equal Opportunity Employer J i E O L E cn M a cn u (reserved for recording information) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT MONTICELLO SENIOR LIVING (LOT 1, BLOCK 2, RIVER VIEW SQUARE THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated , 2019, is by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Monticello Senior Housing Owner LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Developer") 1. BACKGROUND. A. On , 2019, the City approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow an assisted living facility in an R-4 (medium-high density residential) Zoning District. A copy of the City Council resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit is attached in Exhibit A to this Agreement. The Developer submitted an application to the City with supporting development plans (including, but not limited to, site plan, grading plan, erosion control plan, drainage and utility plan, landscaping plan, building plan) to develop the vacant land in the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, legally described as: Lot 1, Block 2, River View Square, consisting of 5.02 acres (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"). Page 1 B. The proposed site improvement and conditional use permit for the Property includes a 3 - story building, consisting of 125 dwelling units for a senior housing facility to be developed in two phases. The first phase will consist of 92 units with an additional 33 units planned for the second phase. The total units in the building will provide varying levels of care -- assisted living, independent living and memory care units. The building will incorporate supporting amenities such as dining rooms, pantries, multi-purpose rooms, chapel, beauty shop, activity rooms, theater room, medical clinic space, therapy, library, fitness room spa, and management offices. The operations of this senior living center will be 24 hours a day, 7- days a week. 2. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The City approved the conditional use permit for the assisted living facility in the R-4 District, including off-street parking spaces and a loading area on the west side of the building as indicated in the Planning Commission Agenda dated June 4, 2019, and approved by the City Council. The conditions of approval consist of: Developer enters into this Agreement, furnishes the security required by it, and records this Agreement, together with any appropriate consents prior to the City's issuance of a building permit for, or development of, the Property. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the development, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties with any appropriate consents and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, and 3) Developer has recorded this Agreement in the office of the Wright County Recorder. 4. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Property shall be developed in accordance with the plans submitted for conditional use permit review and approved on , 2019 (including, but not limited to, site plan, erosion control, landscaping plan, parking plan, building plan) ("Approved Development Plans") except as modified under an approved revised site plan to illustrate a total of 125 off-street parking stalls, and by the approved conditions noted herein. The Approved Development Plans shall not be attached to this Contract. 5. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. This development will be completed in two phases. The first phase will comprise 92 units (78 units devoted to assisted living and 14 units devoted to memory care) with 111 parking stalls (61 surface stalls and 50 underground stalls). Development of the proposed second phase will consist of 33 Page 2 additional units and is subject to approval of a conditional use permit amendment process. At the time the Developer seeks to begin Phase I, the 5.02 acre development site is applicable to City review and fees, including all sanitary, watermain and storm sewer charges. 6. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. This license is subject to the rights of future tenants of the Development and terminates upon completion of the work and improvements described in this Agreement. The City's agents, employees, officers and contractors entering the Development subject to this license shall exercise and observe reasonable safety precautions in performing work and inspections permitted by this license. 7. EROSION CONTROL, STORMWATER CONTROL AND STREET CLEANUP. Prior to initiating site grading, an erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from site and construction work in the Development by the Developer or any other person or entity. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, or repeatedly fails to clean and sweep streets, and such noncompliance or failure is not cured after ten (10) business days' notice to Developer, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate, including the performance of the necessary work by City staff or contracting to have it performed. Charges incurred with the enforcement of erosion control are the responsibility of the developer. No site and construction work will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the development is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan and storm water control measures are in place. 8. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress for grading, utility, parking lot and building construction is to be accessed from the west via two 24 -foot wide driveways along Hart Boulevard as approved by, and may be subject to further recommendations of, the City Engineer. 9. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement, the underground utility and drainage improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. Page 3 10. STORM SEWER AREA CHARGE. The development is subject to a storm sewer area charge in the amount of $40,501.36. The area charge is based on net acreage and is calculated as follows: Storm Sewer Base: 5.02 acres x $3,985.00 = $20,004.70 Storm Sewer Alternate: 5.02 Acres x $4,083.00 = $20,496.66 The storm sewer area charge for the development shall be paid in full prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase I. 11. SANITARY SEWER CHARGE. The development is subject to a sanitary sewer charge in the total amount of $136,896.00. The charge is based on the number of units in Phase I and is calculated as follows: 92 units x $1,488.00 = $136,896.00 The total sanitary sewer charge for the development shall be paid in full prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase I. 12. WATER MAIN CHARGE. The development is subject to a water main charge in the total amount of $101,476.00. The charge is based on the number of units in Phase I and is calculated as follows: 92 units x 1,103.00 = $101,476.00 The total watermain charge for the development shall be paid prior to the time of the issuance of a building permit of Phase I. 13. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. Approval of the conditional use permit and site plan is subject to the following conditions: A. The site plan shall be modified to demonstrate that a total of 125 off-street parking stalls can be provided upon the subject site, subject to review for modification of requirements at the time of the second phase. B. Phase 2 of the senior living facility shall be subject to conditional use permit amendment processing. C. All landscape areas upon the subject site shall be irrigated. D. Building finish materials are found to be consistent with Ordinance requirements. E. The Fire Marshal provide comment and recommendation regarding fire protection issues/requirements for the building. F. The applicants shall provide details related to waste storage and removal activities. Page 4 G. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted subject to City review and approval. H. The submitted site plan shall be modified to illustrate the proposed monument sign location. I. All signs erected upon the subject site shall meet applicable Sign Ordinance requirements and be subject to sign permit. J. Units within the senior living facility shall conform with applicable minimum floor area requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code. This issue shall be subject to further comment and recommendation by the City Building Official. K. Compliance with the comments of the City Engineer's review letter, dated May 30th, 2019. L. To ensure that drop -off -pick and up activities will not disrupt two-way traffic circulation, consideration be given to providing a designated (separate) drop-off/pick-up lane beneath the proposed entrance canopy. M. The developer shall execute the required project development agreement, stormwater maintenance agreement and encroachment agreement. 14. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. A. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement and all of the above plans, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form in Exhibit B to this Agreement, from a bank ("security") for $88,125.00. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Sidewalks/Trails $ 70,500.00 CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL (ESTIMATED) $ 70,500.00 OTHER COSTS: Lot Corners/Iron Monuments $ NA TOTAL COSTS $ 70,500.00 TOTAL SECURITIES: Total Costs X 125% $ 88,125.00 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The City may draw down the security, on five (5) business days written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or without notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have Page 5 been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed. B. To guarantee the completion of subject property landscaping improvements in compliance with approved plans, the Developer shall furnish the City with Security in the amount of $175,000.00 to guarantee landscaping of the subject property in accordance with approved plans. The Security shall be held for two complete growing seasons after installation of landscaping materials to guarantee compliance with City landscaping standards. C. The Developer shall furnish the City with Security in the amount of $15,060.00 to guarantee grading of the subject property in compliance with the approved grading plan. 15. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. A. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees relating to City administration, legal and planning -related expenses associated with the Plat development. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $6,000.00 of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. B. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to the Public Improvements. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to Public Improvements, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be four percent (4.0%), of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,820.00 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development, to pay the fees owed to the City under this Section. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full-time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. The cost of the construction observation is included in the four (4%) estimate. Page 6 C. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to grading and restoration of the subject property. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to grading and restoration of the site, consultation with Developer and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be three percent (3.0%), Developer will provide a $7,350.00 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development, to pay the fees owed to the City under this Section. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section shall be paid from the escrows amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. D. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City prior to the time of building permit issuance: Administration (2%) $ 2,000.00* Legal (2%) $ 2,000.00* Planning (2%) $ 2,000.00* Engineering and Inspection: Grading and Restoration (3%) $ 7,350.00* Streets and Utilities (4%) $ 2,820.00* GPS Locate $ 60.00* Total Cash Requirements $ 16,230.00 * Fees reconciled to actual expenses at close of project. 16. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the site, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval of the site plan, the preparation of this Agreement, review of any other plans and documents. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site approval and Page 7 development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. 17. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. B. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. D. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. E. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. Page 8 F. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. G. The Developer represents to the City that the development complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 18. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 19. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: 17550 Hemlock Avenue, Lakeville, MN 55044. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] Page 9 CITY OF MONTICELLO (SEAL) And STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2019, by Brian Stumpf and Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public Page 10 DEVELOPER: Monticello Senior Housing Owner LLC UZ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) Michael Hoagberg, Its Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2019, by Michael Hoagberg, the Manager of Monticello Senior Housing Owner LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 JJJ Page 11 EXHIBIT A City Council Approval of CUP Page 12 EXHIBIT B FORM OF IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, 'Drawn under Letter of Credit No. , dated , 2 , of (Name of Bank) it, b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) . on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 20_ This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. Its Page 13 Page 14 SUMMARY OF EXPENSES/FINANCE PLAN Multi -Phase Project v3 Total Acres in Development Total Acres in Phase Total Units in Development Total Units in Phase 5.02 gross 5.02 net 5.02 gross 5.02 net Single Family Townhome 125 Mutli-Family Single Family Townhome 92 Multi -Family Trunk Area Charges & Park Dedication Acreage Acres or Credits Net Notes Charge Units Assessment Park & Pathway Dedication Park Dedication Provided NA Special Assessments Lift Station NA Little Mountain Booster Station NA Sanitary Sewer (unit) $1,488 92 $136,896.00 Paid at prevailing rate at time of permit Watermain (unit) $1,103 92 $101,476.00 Paid at prevailing rate at time of permit Storm Sewer Base (net acres) $3,985 5.02 $20,004.70 Paid at prevailing rate at time of permit Storm Sewer Alternate $4,083 5.02 $20,496.66 Paid at prevailing rate at time of permit City Review & Inspection Escrows City Escrow ( General overhead and Admin) 2.00% $2,000.00 $2,000 minimum; Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Legal 2.00% $2,000.00 $2,000 minimum; Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Planning 2.00% $2,000.00 $2,000 minimum; Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Engineering and Inspection $2,000 minimum; Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Grading, Restoration & 3.00% $7,350.00 Based on estimated grading cost, provide estimate Erosion & Sediment Control Inspection Streets and Utilities Review & Inspection 4.00% $2,820.00 Provide estimated pathway and sidewalk costs GPS Locate $60 1 $60.00 Total City Fees $16,230.001 Paid at time of building permit Improvement Construction Costs (Used to Calculate City Fees/Escrows/Securities) Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer Roads, Driveways and Sidewalks/Trails Lighting, Street Signage, Mailboxes total (for purpose of Lot Corners/Iron Monuments other $300 Total Construction Cost for the purpose of calculating LOC Maximum allowable reduction prior to acceptance and bond Notes NA NA NA $70,500.00 Provide estimated pathway and sidewalk cost estimate NA NA 90.00%1 $79,3 Landscaping $175,000.00 Based on estimate of landscaping cost x 125% - provide estimate Prairie Restoration Based on estimate of restoration and maintenance cost Tree Preservation Grading $3,000 5.02 $15,060.00 Surety for gra ding to plan and restoration $190,060.50 CITYOF Monticeflo Council Connection June 24, 2019 CITY OF M 4i6eflo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Community Garden This summer the city of Monticello will celebrate the 10th Anniversary of its community garden! For the last decade a small piece of land behind the Monticello Community Center has been transformed into a community gathering space full of vines, flowers and fresh produce. In the early spring, the Parks Department brings in compost and helps prepare the garden before it's turned over to a dedicated group of registered gardeners. The fenced in space is comprised of 30 plots measuring 15'x20' with walkways throughout. There's a fee of $30 per year for residents to participate, and the garden is currently filled to capacity. The Community Development Department coordinates the garden reservation and ongoing activities. Throughout the growing season, from mid-May to mid-October, gardeners are encouraged to plant and maintain organic produce and donate their surplus produce to the local food shelf. The city contributes with shed full of shared gardening supplies and access to water throughout the space. With contributions from so many people, the garden continues to be a successful space of community building in Monticello! Walk 'n' Roll On June 8 the city of Monticello celebrated the 24th year of Walk 'n' Roll. Walk 'n' Roll is a celebration of Monticello's beautiful parks and pathways. The event route starts at CentraCare Health -Monticello, follows the pathway through Ellison Park and down River Street, and ends with a party in West Bridge Park. This year we had an impressive, 81 pathway partners, over $4,000 worth of bike sponsorships, and 650 plus participants! Participants were also able to enjoy snacks provided by various vendors, face painting, and rock wall climbing. We are looking forward to 2020 when we celebrate our 25th year of fun! This will be our biggest Walk'n' Roll celebration yet. CITY OF �r1t1C��� ............� Transactions May 2019, the DMV processed 13,776 transactions 680 more than May 2018. DMV year - to date revenue is $358,301.83 an increase of $46,804.34 or 15% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 DMV Revenue Comparison $81,261 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 May 2018 May 2019 DMV Transaction Comparison 13,776 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 May 2018 May 2019 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison $358,302 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 May 2018 May 2019 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 64,425 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 May 2018 May 2019 CITY OF M %4i6eflo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT — ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Recent Meeting Summary • April 22, 2019 - Rotary Club Mtg. • April 25, 2019 — BR&E Mtg. with Aroplax • April 29, 2019 — Rotary Club Mtg. • April 30, 2019 — GMEF Loan Closing for Monticello RV Center • May 1, 2019 — Wright County Workforce Pathways Mtg. • May 6, 2019 — Rotary Club Mtg. • May 7, 2019 — Mtg. with Development Prospect • May 9, 2019 — Mtg. with Business Prospect (Project FSJP) • May 21, 2019 — Chamber of Commerce Luncheon Mtg. • May 13, 2019 — Rotary Club Mtg. • May 24, 2019 — Mtg. with Multi -Family Development Prospect • May 28, 2019 — BR&E Mtg. with WSI-Polaris • May 29, 2019 — Meeting with prospect (Project Shepherd) • May 31, 2019 — Rotary Club Community Service Project — Assemble Picnic Tables for Public Works, Plant flowers in Rotary Park -Otter Creek Park • June 3, 2019 — Rotary Club Mtg. • June 5, 2019 —Wright County Workforce Pathways Mtg. • June 6, 2019 - Mtg. with Block 52 Property Owner • June 6, 2019 — BR&E Mtg. with M&M Precision Machining • June 10, 2019 — Rotary Club Mtg. • June 10, 2019 — Meeting with prospect (Project #6580) • June 13-14, 2019 — Attend 2019 EDAM Summer Conference, Duluth, MN • June 18, 2019 — Chamber of Commerce Luncheon Mtg. EDA Block 52 Redevelopment Update The EDA has completed a ranking process of the four prospective Block 52 developers. The results indicated a high comfort level with Beard Group, Inc., Hopkins, MN. The EDA authorized staff to enter into negotiations with Beard Group for a Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA). A meeting with Beard Group is scheduled for June 24, 2019 to discuss EDA goals and terms of the PDA. In its 2019 EDA Work Plan, as a recognition of significant land assembly, the EDA prioritized Council Connection — 06/19/2019 Block 52 as a focus for a targeted revitalization redevelopment project. The EDA and the City combined own 55% of Block 52. Even though Beard Group was selected for further discussions of entering into a PDA, the follow on due -diligence and various planning steps by both parties may take up to 20 months or longer to reach a definitive understanding of a realistic project scope -concept and ability to finalize terms for a final Development Agreement. CITY OF 04keflo HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through May 31, 2019 Attached is the data for total sales in each major category through the end of May 2019. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2019 Total Sales Month 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CYM-LYM Jan $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 $ 403,520.92 $ 413,534.20 2.5% Feb 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 390,050.52 408,769.22 4.8% Mar 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 473,811.33 477,467.15 0.8% Apr 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 467,192.12 489,072.87 4.7% May 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 549,206.70 560,332.38 2.0% Jun 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 561,287.34 - Jul 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 563,935.31 571,270.49 Aug 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 497,201.21 544,029.21 Sep 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 501,126.67 481,663.70 Oct 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 461,549.38 467,600.32 Nov 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 495,519.24 527,900.06 Dec 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 629,143.57 652,695.25 Total $ 4,351,038.78 $ 4,476,911.24 $ 4,652,921.53 $ 4,845,781.08 $ 5,045,614.65 $ 5,165,741.40 $ 5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 5,760,181.65 $ 6,090,227.96 $ 2,349,175.82 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $ 306,377.43 $ 330,046.31 $ (3,741,052.14) Change 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% 5.6% 5.7% -61.4% $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Jan V1. Feb Monthly Hi -Way Sales Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 — ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 2018 ■ 2019 Y -T -D 2.5% 3.6% 2.6% 3.1% 2.9% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2019 Beer Month 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CYM-LYM Jan $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 $ 198,202.11 $ 197,270.15 -0.5% Feb 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 187,042.58 196,211.84 4.9% Mar 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 233,971.24 232,963.84 -0.4% Apr 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 224,348.27 244,892.28 9.2% May 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 306,245.55 304,724.08 -0.5% Jun 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 309,163.93 Jul 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 315,848.83 314,343.95 Aug 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 268,173.42 292,626.23 Sep 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 270,898.13 257,557.44 Oct 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 228,484.62 230,112.85 Nov 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 222,993.99 238,870.03 Dec 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 271,457.72 281,924.05 Total $ 2,187,948.04 $ 2,289,800.74 $ 2,328,734.96 $ 2,483,194.18 $ 2,539,167.70 $ 2,604,942.46 $ 2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 2,933,853.13 $ 3,074,408.23 $ 1,176,062.19 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $ 165,459.25 $ 140,555.10 $ (1,898,346.04) Change 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% 6.0% 4.8% -61.7% $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Jan Feb Monthly Beer Sales Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep [if I Oct Nov Dec ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 Y -T -D -0.5% 2.1% 1.2% 3.3% 2.3% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2019 Liquor Month 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CYM-LYM Jan $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 $ 133,589.33 $ 142,171.51 6.4% Feb 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 128,952.50 142,327.58 10.4% Mar 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 151,716.52 159,432.14 5.1% Apr 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 136,883.13 147,197.73 7.5% May 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 160,936.65 170,109.40 5.7% Jun 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 168,769.36 Jul 118,883.98 122, 861.98 130, 624.19 123, 672.73 139, 270.04 139, 967.77 155, 436.54 150,173.35 160, 220.37 170,108.99 Aug 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 144,263.78 164,013.08 Sep 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 143,252.37 147,649.35 Oct 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 145,864.34 150,852.02 Nov 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 149,468.96 167,360.12 Dec 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 213,217.73 229,121.92 Total $ 1,214,816.54 $ 1,251,447.54 $ 1,343,108.97 $ 1,396,520.80 $ 1,506,776.00 $ 1,546,117.83 $ 1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 1,739,562.18 $ 1,909,952.97 $ 761,238.36 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ 114,654.14 $ 170,390.79 $ (1,148,714.61) Change 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% 7.1% 9.8% -60.1% $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Monthly Liquor Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 Y -T -D 6.4% 8.4% 7.2% 7.3% 6.9% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2019 Wine Month 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CYM-LYM Jan $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 $ 60,047.20 $ 61,183.52 1.9% Feb 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 58,664.45 62,027.36 58,391.94 -5.9% Mar 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 64,286.75 74,221.20 70,209.75 -5.4% Apr 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 69,415.79 93,299.96 83,324.61 -10.7% May 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 82,724.29 61,684.97 67,148.30 8.9% Jun 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 58,623.08 61,777.09 Jul 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 64,034.24 64,494.29 Aug 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 66,304.12 67,701.51 Sep 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 68,220.79 59,923.84 Oct 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 70,516.61 70,894.54 Nov 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 109,969.88 107,567.02 Dec 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 129,536.28 124,115.79 120,746.12 Total $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 889,082.47 $ 894,150.95 $ 904,385.10 $ 340,258.12 Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (38,649.37) $ 5,068.48 $ 10,234.15 $ (564,126.98) Change 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -4.2% 0.6% 1.1% -62.4% Monthly Wine Sales $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 11 11 11 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 Y -T -D 1.9% -2.0% -3.3% -5.7% -3.1% $6.5 $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 c 0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods a E S C N z a z a c �' oz oz a z oz oz a z oz — oz C) o o ov v a v v l0 0 N W Ln Ol v 00 l0 CITY OF 04keflo MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER Transactions and visits Year to date (05.31.19), the MCC processed 39,537 transactions compared to 42,586 transactions last year. The MCC year to date revenue is down from the previous year by $38,244, totaling $673,871. We are down wedding rentals and some program fees. Program fees should pick up next month. Year to date membership visits are up by 1,837, totaling 67,304 visits. Members are at a total of 5,114 compared to 5,726 last year at this time. 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 MCC 5/31 YTD Activity YTD Transactions YTD Member Visits ■ 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 MCC 5/31 YTD Revenue ■ 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 MCC 5/31 Members 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 Council Connection — 06/24/19 Program updates The first Music on the Mississippi had an estimated 550 people in attendance on May 30 with the Shane Martin Band. June 18 - Tuesday night music had over 100 people in attendance. Friendship Island began on Monday, June 10. Men's softball games continue to be rained/stormed out on Tuesday nights. The Farmers Market is going strong with more produce coming in each week. Movie in the Park returns this summer: August 2, Smaf(foot will be showing at Pioneer Park, sponsored by Fleet Farm and August 16, Lego 2 will be showing at Montiview Park, sponsored by Community United Methodist Church. Summer swimming lessons have started and classes are filling up quickly. CITY OF M %4i6eflo PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT — ENGINEERING DIVISION Stormwater Fee — Mixed Use Property The finance committee met on 6/19/2019 and one item discussed was the application of the stormwater utility for mixed use properties that contain both residential and non-residential uses. The stormwater ordinance establishes 7 drainage units per acre of impervious service for non-residential properties and 1 drainage unit per residential unit. Properties that contain both residential and non-residential uses are charged per residential unit as well as for the acreage of impervious surface located on the property. The property owner at 501 3 d Street E has a single-family house along with an enlarged garage where cabinets are made. The resident had concerns with the non-residential stormwater utility charge. It was determined that the since there isn't a showroom and customers aren't coming to the property to conduct business, this property shouldn't be charged a non-residential charge as part of their stormwater fee. Fallon Avenue Landscaping The contractor is finishing up the final touches on the Fallon Avenue Overpass improvements project and here a couple of pictures of the center islands of the roundabout and of the newly installed crosswalk markings.