IDC Agenda 12-17-1992
.
.
.
AGEND
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL D VELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Thursday, December 17 1992 - 7:00 a.m.
City H 11
MEMBERS:
Chairperson Shelley John Vice Chaiperson Don Smith,
Treasurer Ron Hoglung, L well Schrupp, Arve Grimsmo, Jay
Morrell, Harvey Kendall, Ken Maus, Dennis Taylor, Jolm
McVay, Dave Peterson, inda Mielke, Kevin Doty, Tom
Lindquist, Steven Lem e, Merryln Seefeldt, Cyndie
Johnson, Candy Benoit, . nd Mary Micke.
STAFF:
Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, and Ollie Koropchak.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE OVEMBER 19 AND THE DECEMBER 10.
1992 IDC MINUTES.
3. CONSIDERATION TO HEAR AND AC IDC FINANCIAL REPORT.
4.
CONSIDERATION OF PROSPECT UP ATES:
a) Custom Canopy
b) Wilson Tool Internation I, Inc.
e) Andy Robinson
d) US Satellite Broadcasti g, Inc.
e) Alltemp Distribution Co pany
f) Larry Weidt, Realty Wor d
BRE UPDATE:
a) sunny Fresh
h) Genereux Fine Wood Prodcts
c) Fulfillment Systems, Inc.
5.
CONSIDERATION OF COMMITTEE
a) Advertising Committee
b) Work Plan Committee
c) Commercial Real Estate
d) Wright County Economic
e) Quad County Economical
f) Downtown Redevelopment
contract
Plan
Networking
Networking
6.
CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW THE
REPORTS.
992 IDC END-OF-THE-YEAR FINANCIAL
7 .
OTHER BUSINESS.
a) Chamber Banquet, Tuesd
b) Monticello Chamber "
,Tanuary 28.
January 26.
at the Capitol", Thursday,
8. ADJOURNMENT.
.
MINUT
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPME
Thursday, December 10
City H
S
T COMMITTEE SPECIAL
1992 - 7:00 a.m.
11
MEETING
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairperson Selley Johnson,
Hoglund, Lowe 1 Schrupp, Arve
McVay, and Mer lyn Seefeldt.
Treasurer
Grimsmo,
Ron
John
MEMBEHS ABSENT:
Vice Chairper on Don Smith, Harvey Kendall,
Jay Morrell, Dennis Taylor, Dave
Peterson, Lin Mielke, Kevin Doty, steven
Lemme, Tom L 'ndquist , Cyndie Johnson, Mary
Micke, and Cardy Benoit.
STAFF PRESENT:
Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, and Ollie
Koropchak.
GUEST:
John Simola, ublic Works Director.
1. ~ TO ORDER.
.
Chairperson Johnson
7:00 a.m.
IDC special meeting to order at
2. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW AND DISCUSS THE PROPOSED WATER AND
SEWER RATE INCREASES FOR MON ICELLO RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES~
Public Works Director John S'mola gave a brief background of
water/sewer department, its capacities, and the anticipated
revenues shortfalls. The Ci ty of Monticello received a
Federal/State Grant for the construction of the wastewater
Treatment Plant in the ea ly 70's. Federal regulations
require that revenues must cover the plant's operation and
maintanence costs with no accountability of plant
depreciat ion. Todate, the designed plant f low is at 75%
capacity. The IDC recommen ed the City consider a levy for
future upgrade of the Wastew tel' Plant. A suggestion was made
to consider cutting the 0 eration and maintanence costs
through a shared personnel with Big Lake, Monticello, and
Buffalo.
.
Mr. simola reviewed the PI' posed rate increase tables and
answered IDC questions. Ot er suggestions for study were to
consider the elimination of the large 60% discount, to create
a conserve-water incentive program thereby discouraging the
purchase of second sprinkl I' meters, and to propose annual
water/sewer increases rath r than one large increase every
four years. A recommenda ion was made for' ci ty staff to
present the proposed rate ~ncreases to Sunny Fresh prior to
the city Council meeting or invite them to the Council
meeting.
.
.
.
IDC MINUTES
DECEMBER la, 1992
The IDC viewed the proposed w ter/sewer rate increases to be
within reason. The IDC and r. Simola both appreciated the
time given by attendees in th interest of the community.
Q).~ ,,~~~
Ollie Koropchak, Economic Developm nt Director
Pa' e 2
.
.
.
MINU
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL
Thursday, November 1
City
MEMBERS PRESENT;
Chairperson S
Don Smith,
Schrupp, Arve
Taylor, Linda
Steven Lemme,
ilnd Candy Ben
MEMBERS ABSENT;
Jay Morrell,
Seefeldt, and
STAFF PRESENT:
Jeff O'Neill
STAFF ABSENT:
Rick Wolfstel
1. CALL TO ORDER.
ES
EVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
, 1992 - 7;00 a.m.
all
elley Johnson, Vice Chairperson
reasurer Ron Hoglund, Lowell
Grimsmo, Harvey Kendall, Dennis
Mielke, John McVay, Kevin Doty,
Tom Lindquist, Cyndie Johnson,
it.
Peterson, Merrlyn
Koropchak.
er.
Chairperson Johnson called t e IDC meeting to order at 7;03
a.m.
2 .
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 15 1992 IDC MINUTES.
Tom Lindquist made a motion 0 approve the October 15, 1992
IDC minutes, seconded by Ron oglund. With no corrections or
additions, the IDe minutes were approved as written.
3.
CONSIDERATION TO HEAR AND AC
FINANCIAL REPORT.
Treasurer Hoglund reported a Metropolitan Federal balance of
$5,483.09 and a Wright County balance of $5,416.33 for a total
balance of $10,899.42 with n outstanding bills. Don Smith
made a motion to approve the IDC financial report as given,
second by John McVay. With 0 corrections or additions, the
report was accepted and filed.
4. CONSIDERATION TO ANALYZE AND SUMMARIZE THE '92 IDe BANQUET.
Koropchak presented members w"th a financial report comparing
the 1991 and 1992 banquets a d a list of banquet attendees.
Althongh the 1992 banquet ati endance (136) was greater, the
1991 donations were greater and gratis tickets were less
causing a lesser anticipated 992 net profit of $5,007.88 (to-
date). Koropchak billed four business attendees for a total
of $400 and anticipates no p oblems with collections.
IDC members agreed the 1992 banquet was a home-run, a
community npbeat with severa new faces in attendance. The
greater attendance was attrib ted to the keynote speaker and
.
.
.
IDC MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 1992
as a reflection of community support for the IDC's
accomplishments and objecti es. The IDC earmarked two
considerations for '93 banq et improvement: To reserve a
table for newly recruited an prospective business attendees
or for IDC members to be more conscientious of the matter and
secondly, the potential need 0 increase the $25 spouse ticket
price.
As a result of the IDC Banquet, two individuals, Jim Fleming
and Judy Leming, have expres ed interest in IDe membership.
IDC membership will be considered with development of the 1993
Economic Development Work P an. Members were thanked for
their success in ticket sales which displays the team effort
of the IDC.
5.
CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL P OSPECT UPDATE:
a) Steinwall, Inc. - Conti ued communication with Maureen
Steinwall indicates a panned expansion in one to two
years depending on the outcome of the recession. In
response of the IDC's interest to tour the Fridley
facility, Maureen resp nded, "A tour maybe a bit
premature and that Stein all, Inc. has already been sold
on Monticello." The co pany remains interested in the
Monticello Commerce Center area and for the first time
expressed interest in th Becker area.
Chairperson Johnson info med members of a recent banquet
he attended with Dr. J. Bensen, President of Dunwoody
Institute, as guest speaker. Dr. Bensen, brother of
Principal Kermit Bensen, concentrated on state of art
technology and reference Steinwall, Inc. as a company on
the cutting edge. Following the banquet, Johnson
referenced Monticello's onnection with Steinwall, Inc.
through the IDC, the Cha bel', and the Rotary Club. The
IDC earmarked Dr. Bensen as a potential '93 IDC Banquet
guest speaker with Don mith volunteering to make the
initial contact after the holidays. Mr. O'Neill
encouraged the IDC to ta e a lead role in coordinating a
network between local industries, trade/technical
colleges, and the local s hool district to establish job-
training programs.
b)
Custom Canopy - City sta f with meet today with Mr. Jim
Beyl, a company represe ltative, to review preliminary
bui lding and si te plans The eight-year old company
which produces and assel bles canopies for gas station\
(example Tom Thumb) is currently leasing in Rogers.
Plans are to construct a approximate 8,500 sq ft metal
Page 2
.
IDe MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 1992
c}
.
.
office/production faciI ty on one to three acres. The
company is currently wor ing with Oakwood Partnership to
subdivide Lot 2, Block which is east of Martie's Farm
Service. The company mploys 11 full-time people at
entry level wages of ap roximately $8.00. Owner Steve
Birkeland estimates a w nter/spring construction during
the company's low-pro uction time (January through
March). The company do s own property in Albertville.
US Satellite Broadcasti g, Inc. - Koropchak reported on
the time spend with Mr. ierson of Bridge Water Telephone
Company. Mr. Rierson a ember of the Board of Directors
for U. S. Intelco Networ s, Inc. is aware of USSB, Inc.
plans to develop a telem rketing-operators center. This
center would be affili ted with Hubbard Broadcasting,
Inc. who is a leader 0 licensing direct broadcasting
satellites. Although, r. Rierson admits a Monticello
location is a long-shot because of Mr. Stanley Hubbard
connection to Albuquer ue, New Mexico; he suggests we
market Monticello's prime site location and strong
ethical work force and Bridge Water's latest
telecommunication-switc ing technology and service
availabilities. The te emarketing-operators center has
the potential of 350 jo s. Koropchak has prepared the
marketing materials and anticipates a go-ahead from Mr.
Rierson after his initia contact with Mr. Robert Hubbard
regarding the Monticell marketing concept idea. AIl-
prospect information re ains confidential.
d} Irish, Inc. - Mr. Jim I ish informed Koropchak that the
company officials will ake a decision by January 31 to
go or not go into the innesota/Wisconsin market. To-
date, 88,000 recreation 1 equipment catologs are out in
Minnesota and 110,000 c tologs in Wisconsin. The 14,000
sq ft retail/catalog/war house faciIi ty would serve a 60-
mile radius. Mr. Iri h notes location as the "key"
issue, views land costs within the City of Monticello as
high and wonders if the city protects land values. He
has inquired of the Kje lberg property along Highway 25
and the driving range. Koropchak contacted Mr. Barry
Fluth of the business' needs. This after a discussion
wi th ci ty Administrato regarding the Monticello Mall
zoning and the reality f a temporary use permit.
e}
Concrete Production/D stribution/Retail Business
Terrell Towers informe Koropchak that this Canadian
company has now turned he site location search over to
a broker. However, it ~ppears the area of concentration
pag 3
.
.
.
IDC MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 1992
is in the Rogers Industrial Park, a lot with no freeway
exposure and outdoor s orage which backs~up to other
industrial outdoor stora e.
f) Andy Robinson - At this time, Koropchak has been unable
to reach Mr. Robinson at his 878-home number. Tom
Lindquist informed Koro chak that she can obtain Mr.
Robinson work number fro him.
BRE
a)
UPDATE:
Remmele
reminded
tomorrow
Engineering, I c. Tour
of the BRE Re, mele Plant
at 7:30 a.m.
IDe
Tour
members were
scheduled for
Sunny Fresh - Koropchak again encouraged IDC members to
attend the "Building a Bridge to Li teracy" Event co-
sponsored by Sunny Fres; and Monticello I s Adul t Basic
Education this Saturday, November 21, 9:00 a.m. to 2:00
p.m. Don Smith also encouraged IDC support on Saturday
reporting the relationsh p between Sunny Fresh, the city,
and the IDC is at a hig and reported of the company's
move toward communi ty inv lvement. Whi tney McMillan, the
top Cargil official, as a recent visitor to the
Monticello facility. J hn McVay added the company has
potential plans for co tinued outside remodeling and
inquired if the Parks Commission has a shade tree
program.
b)
c) Eric Bondhus - Koropchak alerted members of the 1,500 sq
ft leaseable office space available at the newly
purchased Bondhus Brothe s building. The building is to
the north of The H-Windo .
d) H-Window Company Lemme reported that the
Norwegian Board approved a major expansion and financing
for a 30,000 sq ft pI' duction area and second-f loor
office addition. Consi eration was also received for
acquisition of automatic equipment as the company plans
to introduce two new product-lines in '94. The Phase I
expansion to the east is lanned for October/November '93
unless the recession wou d delay plans. Future Phase II
expansion to the north would house a painting area.
Lemme reported the H-Wi dow is now a recognized product
among the industry.
6.
CONSIDERATION OF NEED TO CHANGE IDC ADVERTISMENT.
This item was referred to the Advertising Subcommittee.
Page 4
.
.
.
IDC MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 1992
7. CONSIDERATION TO ESTABLISH CO MITTEE TO DRAFT THE PRELIMINARY
1993 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WOR PLAN.
A subcommittee of IDC Chairp rson Johnson; Vice Chairperson
Smith; Treasurer and EDA Chai person Hoglund; HRA Chairperson
Larson; Chamber Chairperson-E. ect Mary Micke; John McVay and
Merrlyn Seefeldt, industrial business representatives; and
Kevin Doty, financial institut"on representative, was accepted
by the IDC membership ta draft the preliminary 1993 work plan.
McVay, Seefeldt, and Doty valu teered to fill those designated
fields.
8. OTHER BUSINESS.
The Chamber noted their regular meeting today at the River
Inn-Cabaret and promoted the pcaming "Home for the Holidays"
Events scheduled for December 4, 5, and 6.
Koropchak informed the IDC
Director, would be proposing
for both residents and busi
further noted the '92 Wor
water/sewer hookup increases
It was suggested by Mr. Or
proposed rate increases.
hat John Simola, Public Works
water and sewer rate increases
esses to the Ci ty Council and
Plan recommended IDC review
only prior to Council approval.
eill that the IDe review the
Koropchak informed the IDC the State Grant, Greater
Monticello Enterprise Fund, nd Central Minnesota Initiative
Fund closings for the acqu' si tion of Aroplax machinery &.
equipment would take place w thin the next week.
9. ADJOURNMENT.
The IDC meeting adjourned at 8;15 a.m.
C2J~
y 6\ (9--
Ollie Koropchak, Economic
Pag 5
.
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL D VELOPMENT COMMITTEE
1992 YEAR-END FI ANCIAL REPORT
Wright County State Bank
December 16, 1992
BALANCE, November 15, 1991
REVENUE:
City of Monticello
12-18-91
Chamber Contribution
1-7-92
Advertising Donation
9-17-92
Banquet '92
10~29~92
Banquet '92
11-13-92
SUBTOTAL
.
INTEREST:
November, 1991
December, 1991
January, 1992
February, 1992
March, 1992
April, 1992
May, 1992
June, 1992
July, 1992
August, 1992
September, 1992
october, 1992
November, 1992
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE:
Ollie Koropchak
12--19-91, #530
City of Monticello
1-8-92, #531
Monticello Printing
9-17-92, #532
Ollie Koropchak
9-17--92, #533
Ollie Koropchak
10-14--92, #534
Gartners Office Pro.
10--14--92 I #535
Monti Office Products
. 11- 1 6 -- 92, # 5 3 6
$6,237.40
$ 5,950.00
$ 2,800.00
$ 3,500.00
$ 3,450.00
$ 575.00
$16,275.00
$ 26.
$ 34.
$ 13.
$ 1 .
$ 1.
$ 1.
$ 1.
$ 1.
$ 1.
$ 1.
$ 4 .
$ 11.
16.
$ 117.32
$16,392.32 $22,629.72
$ 4. 6
$14,576. 9
$ 47. 9
$ 5. 5
$ 42. 3
$ 6. 7
$ 105. 8
.
.
.
WRIGHT COUNTY
DECEMBER 16, 1992
Little Mountain Flo.
11---16-92, #537
Monte Club
11-16-92, #538
Monti Bakery
11-19-92, #539
SUBTOTAL
BALANCE, December 16, 1992
$ 33. 3
$ 2,375. 0
$ 19.25
$17,215.85
$17,215.85
$ 5,413.87
......,
.
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL D VELOPMENT COMMITTEE
1992 YEAR-END FI ANCIAL REPORT
Metropolita Federal
December 1 , 1992
BALANCE, November 15, 1991
REVENUE:
Banquet '92
10-29--92
Banquet '92
12~1~92
SUBTOTAL
.
INTERE~;T :
November, 1991
December', 1991
January, 1992
February, 1992
March, 1992
April, 1992
Ma y, 1992
June, 19 q 2
July, 1992
August, 1992
September, 1992
October, 1992
November, 1992
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
EXENDITURE:
MIDA (Membership)
2~20"-92, #1020
USED-IN-ERROR
9~21--83, #1021
Dino's
5~6~92, #1022
ollie Koropchak
5-6~92, #1023
Riverwood Conference
5--6"-92, #1024
Chris Lammel Prod.
5~21~92, #1025
Ollie Koropchak
7--17.-92, #1026
City of Monticello
10~27-92, #1027
Ollie Koropchak
10-27-92, #1028
Business Media
. 11-16~92, #1029
$ 3,030.10
$ 3,425.0
$ 400.0
$ 3,825.00
$ 12.89
$ 11- 9
$ 11- 8
$ 10. 1
$ 9, 0
$ 10. 1
$ 8 . 6
$ 8 . 2
$ 8. 2
$ 7. 2
$ 7. 6
$ 7. 0
14. 6
$ 129.62
$ 3,954.62 $ 6,984.72
$ 110. 0
$ 54.74
$ 20.03
$ 291.49
$ 95 00
$ 21 95
$ 25 56
$ 51 10
$ 417 00
.
.
.
Metropolitan Federal
December 16, 1992
MN Real Estate Journal $
12-2-92, #1030
Little Mountain Flo. $
12-2-92, #1031
SUBTOTAL
BALANCE, December 16, 1992
646.8
14.6
$ 1,748.32
$ 1,748.32
$ 5,236.40
.
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL D~VELOPMENT COMMITTEE
YEAR END FINANCI~L COMPARISON
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
CHECKING ACCOUNT
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
MONEY MARKET
SECURITY FINANCIAL
MONEY MARKET
YEARS TOTAL BALANCE
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
CHECKING ACCOUNT
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
MONEY MARKET
SECURITY FINANICAL
. MONEY MAHKET
YEARS TOTAL BALANCE
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
MONEY MARKET
METROPOLITAN FEDERAL
MONEY MARKET
YEARS TOTAL BALANCE
.
MARCH 198 MARCH 1988
$ 159.8 ) $ 284.88
$ 3,560.2 ) $ 5,702.96
$ 3,366.95 $ 3,534.60
$ 7,086.95 $ 9,522.44
DECEMBER 1989 DECEMBER 1990
$ 24.03 $ 86.15
$ 7,957.53
$ 6,104.95
$ 3,922.24
$ 4,082.51
$10,273.61
$11,903.80
DECEMBER 1992
$ 5,413.87
$ 5,236.40
$10,650.~7
JANUARY 1989
$
314.05
$16,296.97
$ 3,693.86
$20,304.88
NOVEMBER 1991
--,
CLOSED
$ 6,237.40
$ 3,030.10
$ 9,267.50
.
199
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL EVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
PROPOSED BUDGET
1991 ACTUAL 1992 PRO 199~AgJUAL J_S)_!?_~,_]? R 0 P 0 SED
BALANCE $10,273.61 $ $ 9,267.50 $10,650.27
REVENUE:
Banquet $ 7,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 7,850.00
75.00(90)
City Contrib $ 5,650.00 $ $ 5,950.00
Chamber Contr $ 2,800.00 $ $ 2,800.00 $ 2,800.00
Interest $ 374.67 $ $ 246.94
Video Contr $ 3,425.00
Advert Contr $ 3,500.09,_
TOTAL REVENUE $29,598.28 $29,614.44
EXPENDITURES:
Salary $13,215.96(90) $14,576.69(91)
Banquet S 1,989.72 $ 2,542.12
"
Travel Exp $ 0 0
Prospects $ 160.70 $ $ 188.66
Membership $ 95.00 $ $ 110.00
. Seminars $ 0 0
Market/Adv $ 4,700.00 $ $ 1,158.80
BRE $ 169.40 $ $ 310.74
Miscellaneous $ 0 $ $ 77.16
Service Chg ,.$ 0 ,-~~,--,_.~--
TOTAL EXPEND $20,330.78 $18,964.17
BALANCE
$ 9,267.50
$ 5,995.8
$10,650.27
.
.
GMEF La NS
GNEF LOAN NO. 001 - TAPPERS $88,000 8% AMORTIZED 20 YEARS
BALLOONED IN 7 YEARS. ($736.07)
8-13-90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
BALLOON PAYMENT
PAYBACK
$ 2,944.28
8,832.84
8,832.84
8,832.84
8,832.84
8,832.84
8,832.84
5,888.56
70,989.14
$132,819.02
GMEF LOAN NO. 002 - MULLER THEATRE $50,000 8% AMORTIZED 20 YEARS
BALLOONED IN 5 YEARS. ($418.22)
12-1-90 $ 418.22
91 5,018.64
. 92 5,018.64
93 5,018.64
94 5,018.64
95 4,600.42
BALLOON PAYMENT 43,762.79
PAYBACK $ 68,855.99
GMEF LOAN NO. 003 - NULL AND VOID
GMEF LOAN NO. 004 - BARGERS $ 0,000 4.5% AMORTIZED 20 YEARS
BALLOONED IN 5 YEARS. ($316.32)
12-1-92 $ 316.32
93 3,795.84
94 3,795.84
95 3,795.84
96 3,795.84
97 3,479.52
BALLOON PAYMENT 41,350.00
PAYBACK $ 60,329.20
.
.
.
.
GMEF LOAN NO. 005 - SCROENS $85,000 6% AMORTIZED 7 YEARS
($1,241.73)
12-1-92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
$ 1,241.73
14,900.76
14,900.76
14,900.76
14,900.76
14,900.76
14,900.76
13,338.57
PAYBACK
$103,984.86
11-24-92
PREPARED BY OLLIE KOROPCHAK
GMEFLOAN.ACC
. TIF GME STATE
"SURPLUS" LOA S UDAG GRANT
BEGINNING
BALANCE $127,975 $ 3 ,623 $ 7,971 $ 2,483
1993 $ 18,217 $ 3 ,548 $ 27,971 $ 29,801
1994 $ 1,739 $ 3 ,548 $ 27,971 $ 29,801
1995 $ 12,728 $ 7 ,892 $ 27,971 $ 29,801
1996 $ 12,040 $ 2 ,529 $ 27,971 $ 29,801
1997 $ 17,447 $13 ,607 $ 27,971 $ 12,417
1998 $ "8,078 $ 1 ,900 $ 27,971
1999 $ 18,609 $ 1 ,338 $ 27,971
TOTAL $216,841 $36 ,989 $203,770 $134,106
.
11-24-92
PREPARED BY OLLIE KOROPCHAK
ECONOMIC.REV
.
.
~, ..' 1
~ ~
L-.-... " . .r.....,... .?"~X"X'- .~
~
MONTICELLO
November 20, 1992
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
Fax: (612) 295-4404
Mr. Jim Beyl
Custom Canopy
12903 Main Street, Suite 203
P.O. Box 275
Rogers, MN 55374
Dear Mr. Beyl:
.
First, it was a deLight to mee you inperson on Thursday and
secondly, I thank you for taking he time to share Custom Canopy's
development plans with city staff. It is the City of Monticello's
hope to continue working with you business to assure a smooth
construction process within our c mmunity.
As promised, I have enclosed a copy of the Greater Monticello
Enterprise Fund (GMEF) Guidelines along with the preliminary and
formal applications. In the me ntime, I will run preliminary
estimated numbers for potential T x Increment Finance, assistance.
If I can be of further assistanc or if you have any additional
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at METRO 333-5739 or
(612) 295-2711. Again, city sta f looks forward to working with
Custom Canopy.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Ollie Koropchak
Economic Development Director
.
cc: IDe Fi.le
Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Admi istrator
Gary Anderson, Building Offl ial
~
~ . , .. )
~ ~
l~.~"...n_....._n."
~
MONTICELLO
November 20, 1992
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
Fax:- (612) 295-4404
Mr. Andy Robinson
Right-Choice Services, Inc.
9060 Zachary Lane
Maple Grove, MN 55311
Dear Mr. Robinson:
.It was a pleasure to visi t on the telep lOne wi th you. I congratulate you on
the successful management of a s artup company during a time of
unpredictability. I encourage you to strongly consider Monticello as the
site location for your planned expansi n.
Along with Monticello's strong tax base, Interstate 94 allows us the ability
to blend "small town" living with a metropolitan flavor. If you are
interested in hearing about our financ.al packaging options or assistance,
please don't hesitate to ask. Montie 110 has introduced a revolving loan
program which is used as a secondary source to commercial lenders. Its
intended use is for "gap" financing, yet, hopefully recognized as an
incentive.
As promised, enclosed is Monticello's marketing brochures. Please don't
hesitate to call me at (612) 295-271 or METRO 333--5739 if you have any
quest ions. As a follow-up to this 1 tter, I wi 11 contact you after the
Thanksgiving holiday.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
C:y)~~-~ \~Cl) (~,-g 3~~
OlLie Koropchak
_conomic Development
cc: IDC File
Director
,I
I I 1" \
i'
~
~
MONTICELLO
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295~2711
Metro: (612) 333~5739
Fax~ (612) 295A404
December 3, 1992
Mr. Jim Mishek
Wilson Tool International
12912 Farnham Avenue
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Dear Mr. Mishek:
.
Thank you for your expressed interest to exp nd Wilson Tool Intemational to the city of
Monticello. Monticello's Economic Developme t Team will cooperatively work with you to
assure a smooth development process.
Why select Monticello for YOW' expansion? Mo ticello is located just 25 minutes northwest
of Minneapolis/St. Paul via Interstate 94. he freeway provides commercial/industrial
businesses with a larger labor force base from hich to attract employees with strong ethical
standards. Businesses and residents are at racted to Monticello because of our below-
average tax rate due to the NSP Nuclear PI t, our quality educational and community~
educational programs, and recreational oppo unities such as the Mississippi River, Lake
Maria State Park, golf, tennis, and more. The City even provides "free" residential garbage
pickup.
Also, the City of Monticello can provide yo with site location assistance and financial
packaging options and assistance. More speci cally, the City has a local revolving loan fund
and utilizes tax increment financing. Federal state, and regional financial funding sources
are also available to qualified applicants. U on your request, I would be most pleased to
contact the City's consultant to prepare financial proposal based on Wilson Tool
Intemational's needs.
.
.
Mr. Jim Mishek
December 3, 1992
Page 2
Mr. Mishek, I extend an invitation to you and y ur associates to visit the city of Monticello
and tour our industrial sites. The Monticello E onomic Development Team would be your
host and thereafter, upon your convenience, th team would be most pleased to visit your
existing facility in White Bear Lake.
Enclosed you will find information about Mon cello inclusive of maps outlining available
industrial sites, the Shingobee, Inc. PrePlan, d the City's video. If you have additional
questions, please don't hesitate to call me at (6 2) 295-2711 or METRO 333-5739.
Again, thank you for your interest to expand Wi son Tool International to Monticello. I will
be in contact with you shortly.
Respectfully,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
(t)~ ~ cf) ~~
. Ollie Koropchak
Economic Development Director
cc: Pat Pelstring, BDS. Inc.
IDC File
.
f"l
~ ~
L_~J
"~
MONTICELLO
December 8, 1992
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
Fax: (612) 295-4404
Mr. Joel LaValle
Remmele Engineering, Inc.
Plant 20
213 Chelsea Road
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Mr. LaValle:
.
On behalf of the Monticello Industrial Development Committee (IDC),
I wish to express a heart ful "thanks" to you and Mr. Steve
Symanietz for the November 20 tour. The success of your operation
was very evident.
Remmele Engineering is a quality company and the IDC is proud to
have Plant 20 call "Monticello, ts Kind of Place." Additionally,
tile IDC was delighted to hear of your proposed future plans for a
Plant 20 expansion. If you h ve any questions, please don't
hesi tate to call me at 295-.271 or to contact one of the IDC
members.
Much continued success to Remmel Engineering and its staff.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Ollie Koropchak
Economic Development Director
cc: IDe File /
.
i
.I I I' ,
~
~-"~.....
~
MONTICELLO
December 8, 1992
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
Fax: (612) 295-4404
Dear IDC Member:
.
Enclosed you will find a copy of the City Council agenda item on
the proposed water and sewer rate increases as prepared by Public
Works Director John Simola. As expresssed at the November IDC
meeting, it was the IDC' sinter st to review the proposed rate
increases prior to Council consideration and approval. With the
assumption of Council approval and to allow ample time for resident
and business notification of th approved rate increases, the
proposed increases mu.st appear on the December 14 Ci ty Council
Agenda. Therefore, a special meet ng of the IDC has been scheduled
for Thursd~ December 10 at 7:00 a.m. at the Cit Hall to review
the proposed rate increases. Mr. Simola will be present to review
the information with you. If you annot attend but have questions,
please don't hesitate to call Mr. Simola at 295-3170.
Secondly, would members of the I C Advertising Committee please
remain to consider any changes to the second Business Media
advertisement. -
Thirdly, the regular Thursday, De ember 17 IDC meeting is still on
schedule.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
G.Qk ~6'~SJ
Ollie Koropchak
Economic Development Director
.
cc: John Simola, Public Works Di ector
.
.
.
C
'1'),1':\,,,
\.,"-",7, ","'" '"',,,'1 ~,.....
.'II'4.:'r
Council Agenda - 12/14/92
Consideration of increase in sew r and water rates. (J.S.l
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGR UND:
Based upon the 1993 budget and the projected revenue at the current rates,
we are projecting shortfalls in bot the sewer and water operation and
maintenance funds for 1993.
In the water fund, a projected 199 revenue of $141,050 versus projected
expenditures of $163,000 leaves us $ 1,950 short for 1993. It would take an
overall increase of 15.6% in the wate rates to cover the projected shortfalL
In the sewer fund, with a projected r venue of $432,400 versus expenditures
of $450,480 for 1993, we have a projected shortfall of $18,080. We need an
increase of approximately 4.2% in our revenue to cover this shortfall. We have
a projected surplus in the fund thro gh 1992 of $15,681; however, without a
rate increase, this surplus will be com a negative balance by the end of 1993.
Sanitary Sewer Rates
The rate structure for sanitary se er rates is based upon the estimated
billable flow of wastewater, the stren th or organic content of the wastewater
measured in pounds of BOD, and the amount of grit or dirt in the wastewater
measured in pounds of total suspen ed solids. Once these parameters are
known, we follow standard procedur s for calculating the rate structure. Our
industrial users, specifically Sunny F esh, pay for sewer use based upon actual
measurements of all three of the abo e parameters. Residential, commercial,
and governmental customers pay a combined rate based upon the average
characteristics of our wastewater wi hout industry. Sunny Fresh Foods, our
largest industrial user, impacts our s wer rates significantly. They have made
changes in the past year which hav reduced the BOD and total suspended
solids content of their wastewater s~ nificantly*, while those parameters for
the remaining users in the communit have continued to grow. Consequently,
when restructuring rates this year, unny Fresh Foods sees a large benefit.
The overall effect is a modest increa' e in the unit cost for flow and BOD but
a drop in the cost for total suspended solids. The new proposed rate structure,
which will add approximately $18,0 '0 in revenue, is as follows:
* NOTE: Sewer bill for Sunny Fresh in 1991 = $148,283; 1992 est. = $102,690 (a
$45,593 drop in revenue)
.
Parameter
Flow/l00 cf
BOD
Total
Suspended
Solids
Combined
Rate/100 cf
Council Agenda - 12/14/92
SANITARY SEWER TE
1992 1993 % Increase
Rate Rate (Decrease)
$0.811 $0.8 7 8.1% - industry
$0.150 $0.1 0 6 .7% - industry
$0.273 $0.2 8 (20.1%) - industry
$1. 515
$1. 6
8.9% - Resid.,
Corom. ,
& Govt
Our last rate increase for sanitary se er was in January of 1990 when the rate
was increased 13.9%. Our last increa e prior to that was in 1987. Overall, for
the past 11 years sewer rates have increased an average of 2.6% per year
(including the proposed increase).
.
Attached is a chart of the effects f the sewer rate increase for vanous
customers (TABLE 1).
Water Rates
Our last major water rate increase ook place in 1987, except for the $1.50
increase in the minimum bill in Jul 1992 from $6 per quarter to $7.50 to
cover state testing requirements.
Raising the revenue $21,950 in the water fund for 1993, or an increase of
15.6%, appeared at first to have significant impact on all customers.
However, when we looked at our wat r rates and compared them with nearby
communities, we found that the lower users in our community (residential and
smaller commercial) were supportin the larger commercial and industrial
users to a great extent.
In Monticello, a customer can use up 0 500 eu ft, or 3,740 gallons, per quarter
and pay a flat fee of $7.50. The ne t 3,500 eu ft, or approximately 26,000
gallons, is charged out at $.50 per 10 cu ft. Approximately 42% of our water
sold is at the minimum, or the $.50 ate.
.
For the next 71,000 eu ft, or approx mately 1/2 million gallons per quarter,
those customers receive a 40% disco t from the base rate. Approximately 1/3
of all our water is sold under this 40 () discount. The next step rate that the
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/92
City has involves a 60% discount off he base rate, and approximately 1/4 of
our water sold is sold at this 60% disc unt rate. Our base rate customers are
supporting the heavy use of the disc unted customers. While it can be said
that the more water used at a spe ific site should be slightly cheaper to
produce, discounts of 40% to 60% are 0 longer common place in the industry.
The City has had these discounts in ffect for more than a decade; however,
other communities around us have c t back to a base rate and a minimum
discount. The highest discount in an one of our surrounding communities is
the City of Elk River, which gives a 2 1/2% discount to larger users.
City staff checked with the Minnesota eague of Cities and were provided with
research data from August of 1990. e found that there are still cities that
do offer discounts to large users; ho ever, many of the base rates of those
cities were 5 to 10 times what the Cit of Monticello is charging. The majority
of communities have gone to smaller . scounts and many to no discount at all.
Based upon that information, City st proposes the following rate change.
WATER
. Charge Charge
Usage/Qtr Per 100 CF Per 100 CF Dollar Percent
in Cu Ft 1992 Rate 1993 Rate Increase Increase
0-500 cf $10.00 $10.00 $0.0 0%
minimum
501 cf to $ 0.50 $ 0.55 $0.05 10%
4000 cf
4001 cf to $ 0.30 $ 0.35 $0.05 16.7%
75,000 cf
75,001 cf $ 0.20 $ 0.35 $0.15 75%
and over
.
While the above rate increases are si ificant for large users, there are still
increases for the small users, and he above fee schedule would tend to
equalize the big differences in our ra structure. We would still offer a 36%
discount to large users and still hav one of the cheaper water rates in the
state of Minnesota. The biggest sing e user affected by this rate increase is
Sunny Fresh Foods. This, however, ay be the most opportune year to affect
such a rate increase, as the overall in rease for Sunny Fresh in the combined
sewer and water rates for 1993 amo ts to only 3.5%. Also, indications are
that they may cut back further on s me of their water usage, which would
make their 1993 costs identical to 19 2 or even less.
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/92
Attached is a chart showing the effi cts of the 1993 water rate on various
customers (TABLE 2).
Some of you may be thinking that th rates are tied to the expansion of the
work force in the water and sewer co] ection system. The effect on the sewer
rates is minimal. The difference in re enue needed is less than 2% and would
have little effect on the combined sewer rate due to restructuring. In the
water department, however, the effect is more significant. Approximately 75%
of our 1993 increases in expenses are due directly to the addition in the work
force. Without the addition to the wo force, we would still be recommending
dropping the 60% discount rate to the 40% level. This would more than likely
give us enough revenue to get by with ut the additional manpower for the time
being; however, it would only be a st p gap measure, as the work load in the
water department has increased beyo d the capabilities of the two individuals
in that department.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
The first alternative is to appro e the water and sewer rate increases as
outlined above effective Janua 1, 1993.
.
2.
The second alternative is not t approve any increase for the sewer or
water fund and operate in the ed.
3. The third alternative would be 0 increase sewer rates as outlined above
but only remove the 60% disco, t rate in the water rate structure at
this time.
4. Make other changes in the wa er and sewer rates as directed by City
Council.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The sewer rate increase should be the 8.9% as indicated above. Rate
restructuring requires this increase a d additional manpower in the collection
system has very little effect on the ate. It is also recommended that the
Council strongly consider approving the water rate structure as indicated
above as outlined in alternative #1. Since the user fees for water are not
outlined by city ordinance or controll d by federal regulations as the sewer
rates are, the Council could consider ther options such as alternative #3.
.
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/92
However, to operate an enterprise fun where the users pay the operation and
maintenance cost should be our goal. If the Council considers altemative #3,
we may be again looking at a water ate increase to provide proper funding
within the next year or two.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Table 1, 1993 Sewer Rate Increase E
Table 2, 1993 Water Rate Increase E ect;
Table 3, Water and Sewer Rate Com arison with Other Communities;
Table 4, Customers with Water Usa e over 75,000 cu ft per quarter
(60% discount);
Table 5, Sewer Rate Worksheet.
.
.
.
tIJ
~
E-
.
tIJ
lZl
~
U
Z
-
~
tIJ
~
~
~
0\
00
-
..
E-
U
tIJ
~
~
tIJ
~
~
U
Z
-
tIJ
E-
:a
~
lZl
M
0\
0\
-
... Q)
e: (/)
Q) ctl
U Q)
"- "-
Q) U
a.. e:
$ ~
'0 ctl
a ~
U
e:
~ ~ Q5
en ctl t:
..- Q5 ~
~o
C\l Q) "-
en Ol Q)
enctlt:
..- "- ctl
~ :J
<(0
Q)>'~
Ol>:
ctl Q) ctl
"- ... (/)
Q)ea:;:)
> :J
<(0
-g.
o
ci
o
o
o
w
o
o
ci
..-
w
o
o
o
..-
w
't5
o
C\l
'<:t
(/)
(/)
Q)
e:
'US
:J
m
(ij
E
en
..g
o
C\l
..-
('I)
..-
ci
w
U)
<0
..-
..-
w
C\l
U)
..-
w
-
U
o
C\l
U)
Q)
a.
:J
o
U
"-
Q)
:Q
o
..g
o
co
u:i
('I)
co
C\l
w
U)
<0
'<:t
'<t
W
C\l
IX)
..-
'<t
fh
13
U)
,....
U)
C\l
U)
'0
~
'E
ctl
u.
~
en
,...:
..g
o
('I)
to
en
C\l
,....
fh
co
C\I
N
..-
Y}
o
..-
oi
en
Y}
U)
..-
ci
<0
..-
fh
..-
IX)
,....
co
,...:
'<t
..-
Y}
..-
en
fh
-
U
U)
C\I
ro
U)
-
U
U)
,....
Ul
en
~
~
Q)
.c
I-
E
ctl
"-
:J
ctl
Ci5
Q)
0: Q)
-
(ij ctl
E'2
en 0
..g
o
,....
IX)
..-
en
o
('I)
fh
U)
Q)
"-
o
en
oi:l
e:
o
.~
en
oi:l
..g
o
co
to
..g
o
ro
IX)
'<t
CD
N
<D
W
CD
CD
CD
en
fh
o
CD
U)
,....
,....
Y}
o
'<t
..-
en
..-
..-
fh
CD
0>
C\I
..-
,....
fh
'<:t
,....
'<t
0>
q
..-
w
13
U)
o
IX)
CD
'<t
-
U
U)
'<t
o
C\I
,....
>.
"-
"0
e:
:J
ctl
...J
Q) ...
Ole:
"- ctl
ctl "-
...J :J
ctl
~Ci5
Q) Q)
>0:
-g.
0>
to
-
..g
o
0>
..-
'-'
'<t
~
U)
('I)
C\I
fh
0;-
C\I
to
'<t
~
..
..
o
CD
,...:
co
tt?
C\I
w
0>
o
..-
0>
..-
U)
C\I
fh
CD
..-
ro
('I)
C\I
,....
~
U)
C\I
Y}
C\I
U)
CD
C\I
fh
'0
('I)
0>
ro
'<t
,....
..-
-
U
U)
C\l
U)
0>
o
o
..-
..
Q)
E
o
:I:
Ol
e:
'US
"-
:J
Z
>.
"-
......
(/)
:J
"0
e:
Q)
Ol
"-
ctl
...J
>.
"-
Q)
>
......:.,
Q5
...
ea
:J
cr
"-
Q)
a.
C\I
C\I
U)
U)
q
..-
w
-
o
a.
o
"-
"0
ctl
Q)
Ul
:J
ctl
U
:Q
:J
o
~
>.
ctl
"0
"-
Q)
a.
Cij
Ol
o
o
o
o
...:
Q)
Ul
:J
.~
=
"-
.E
a.
o
-0
(ij
"-
Q)
>
o
,S
"0
Q)
==
:J
(/)
Q)
"-
'0
a.
o
....
"0
~
3=
g
C\l
0>
0>
..-
~
Ci5
:J
"0
,S
"-
o
-
Ul
Q)
...
ttl
....
-
o
Ol
e:
'i::
:J
t5
:J
"-
Ci5
Q)
a:
u
z
a:
w
3:
w
en
C\I
0>
I
U
Q)
o
I
'<t
o
e:
o
a.
:J
"0
Q)
Ul
ctl
m
..
..
..
.
T
Average Cost
Quarterly Quarter Dollar Percent
Customer Tvpe Usaqe 1993 Increase Increase
Small Business 420 cf $ .50 $7.50 $0.00 0.0%
Older Couple 790 cf $ .00 $9.15 $0.15 1.7%
Family of 5 3,175 cf $2 .00 $22.35 $1.35 6.4%
Small Restaurant 9,575 cf $4 .80 $46.35 $4.55 10.9%
Large Car Wash 23,360 cf $8 .20 $94.65 $11 .45 13.8%
with Station & Store
Laundry (coin oper.) 46,805 cf $15 .70 $176.90 $23.20 15.1%
. Very Large Restaurant 72,045 cf $22 .30 $265.1 0 $35.80 15.6%
Nursing Home 178,135 cf $44 .40 $636.45 $192.05 43.2%
Theatre (summer months * 240,400 cf $70 .80 $1,090.40 $386.60 54.9%
with air conditioning)
Theatre (winter months) 7,300 cf $3 .90 $38.30 $3.40 9.7%
Very Large Industry 1,593,502 cf $3,27 .20 $5,590.25 $2,315.05 70.7%
* Note: Extremely high due to air conditioner malfunction.
.
WATERINC: 04-Dec-92
.
(')0)'01:
=II: ~ Cr5 ,2
I: 0) >- CD
~>.oCD
2~mO
:;;: 0)
'0>-2
'Om(/)
<(a.
o
'<t
to
w-
o
....
co
(')
C\I
""
w-
o
co
oi
en
(')
w-
,...
(X)
w-
en
10
C\I
co
en
'<t
w-
i
O'l
o
ci
o
co
""
w-
C\I
(')
CO)
w-
.
~ ~ 8/ 0 0 0 0 ,... "" 10 ....J
Cll 0 0 co "" en .... ,... <(
0) -
0 '<t ..- ~ 10 III co ~ I-
>- I-
co C\I C\I en ,... en co 0
C\I "" O'l co '<t co I-
~ (') CO) ex)
~ co
-< ~
VJ ~ ~I 0 0 0 0 0 0) 10
;:l -
0 0 0 C\I ,... ..- c: '<t
~ CO) en en co 0 ~
~ '0 co '<t en 0 "" Z m
~
CO) 10 '<t 0 10
;:l C\I ,... (')
CI C\i
E::
"I:t ~ ~ ~I 0) 0 0 0 '<t "" 0
== -
0 c: 0 "" 10 co .... ""
~ r-. ;:l 0 ex) ,... en ~ ~ ""
'0 Z "" "" C\I en 0
~ ~ u c: ....
co 0 CO) '<t ex)
~ C\I ,... 10
. ~ ....
~
"'
~ ~ ~I 0) 0) 0 0 "" 0) 0
::E = a I: I: "" 0 10 c: 0 C
~ 0 0 "! (') ,... 0 ~ 0
~ t) z Z 10 0 co Z '<t .;;;
,... ,... 0 CO) C\I f..)
,... ~ c:
VJ ::)
~ 0 ,... -
~
U E
~
~ ~I 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0) 0 0)
a c: c: c: ,... co c: 0 c:
0 0 0 ~ I'-:. 0 "". g
-5 z z Z 10 co Z CO) '5
'<t en 0 c:
co 0
.... f..)
~
'Cij
0
-
0)
::)
"0
.c:
.!2' C\I
.c: en
I
CI) >- f..)
0) Ol '0 CD 0)
~ c: 0 E 0
iii Cil "w .c: 0 0) I
0) <.5 ~ ,!2' u.. ~
a. .c: ::) ~
<( l- E z :r: .c: ><
CI) w
~ >- .Q >< .Q .Q 0) w
0) Cll 0 CD ~ W (/)
E ~ 0) u.. 0) CI) u..
f..) f..) f..) '0 c: >- I- ::>
0 0) '~ ~ ".-:; 0) E 0 :i: c: 0 l-
t) Ol c: 0) c: E (/)
:g 0 ~ 0 0 .c: ~ c: Z
. ::) 0 f..) Q) ::) ::l
U a: ::E U3 ::E :r: ::E en a.. en . u
TABLE 5
.
SEWER RATE WORKS ~EET
BUDGET FOR OPERATION & MAINTAINENCE
1. COLLECTION SYSTEM
2. PLANT & LAB
TOTAL
~f~~t~~i~
.;.:.; 386..1:55..00.;.
........, --... .._"" .......
$450,480.00
1993
PERCENT
0.143
0.857
3. CREDITS/DEBITS
SPECIAL REVENUES
EXCESS REVENUES OVER EXPNES LAST VR
TOTAL
EXPENES OVER REVENUE
TOTAL
................$..........................................
......-- .. -.. ..
.._-.... .. - .. .
...,.... .... . .
:;::::;:::::::::. ..lj:i4:AA4~~t
::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::jo~OO:::
$7,400.00
:::::::::::::i:::::i:::'::::::::::$O~OO:::
$7,400.00
4. USER FEES REQUIRED
o & M BUDGET
CREDITS
USER FEES REQUIRED
A. COLLECTION SYSTEM
.B. PLANT & LAB
TOTAL
UNIT COSTS
1. FLOW=100% COL. + 40% PLANT & LAB
COSTS: 100%
40%
TOTAL
ESTIMATED BILLABLE FLOW GALS.
ESTIMATED BILLABLE FLOW CU.FT.
COST/100 CU. FT.=
$450,480.00
$7,400.00
$443,080.00
$63,268.34
.$379,811.66
$443,080.00
$63,268.34
$151,924.66
$215,193.00
j:::/:?O"~o.jt
24533333.33
$0.877
2. BOD=30% PLANT & LAB
COSTS: 30%
ESTIMATED LBS. BOD
COST/LB BOD
.3. TSS = 30% PLANT &LAB
COSTS: 30%
ESTIMATED LBS. TOTAL 8.S.
COST/LB. TSS
$113,943.50
: :::::/))>::::t\~~~~f
$0.160
$113,943.50
. ..,..............,..........
.' .......................5'' '2' "3" '7' '0" 0" '.'.
"........... . .
. ...........' .. ..
:::::::;:::::::::::::::;:.....:.....::.....:::
$0.218
.
INDUSTRIAL LOADING EST.
....... .. ................
FLOW MG ><>J!~:~f$$~I(BOD LBS <:::>~1:$.,~f).:
REVENUE $31,056.79
$43,916.56
$21,431.04
-...................,.,.
TSS LBS ::::::::;:;:;::::;:;," 8' "5" 0': .~v
-:-:-:':';':':-:<<-.. ,",., .... .<~.;.
RESIDENTIAL, COMM. & INSTITUTIONAL LOA ING EST.
FLOW TOTAL BILLABLE FLOW ALL USER IN MG
lESS IN DUSTRIAL FLOW EST.
= RES. COMM. & INST. FLOW
ESTIMATED REVENUE $184,136.21
BOD
TOTAL BOO =
LESS IND. BOD
= RES. COMM. & INST. BOD
ESTIMATED REVENUE
TSS
.
TOTAL TSS =
LESS IND. TSS
=RES. COMM. & INST. TSS
ESTIMATED REVENUE
$70,026.94
$92,512.46
184
26.555
157.445
713500
275000
438500
523700
98500
425200
TOTAL RES. COMM. & INST. REVENUE
RATE
RATE = REVENUE I RES. COMM. & INST. FLO
.
$346,675.61
$1.65
PER 100 CU FT
~
. , .' ~
~ ,
L.~~--F"A.r" "~~""-~"_
~
MONTICELLO
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295~2711
Metro: (612) 333~5739
Fax:- (612) 295-4404
November 16, 1992
Dear IDC Member:
.
Plans have been made with Mr. Joe LaValle of Remmele Engineering,
Inc. to tour their expanded facil ty on Friday, November 20, 1992.
The ()ne~hour scheduled event will begin at 7:30 a.m with a brief
overview of Remmele's history and an eye-opening cup of coffee and
rolls. The tour will follow.
P lease make every effort to att nd thereby aff irming the IDC I S
support and appreciation of emmelers investment into our
community. Please meet at the Remmele facility located at 213
Chelsea Road, Oakwood Industrial Park.
Sincerely,
~
Ollie Koropchak
Economic Development Director
.
u Q) .... I to ,.... ,.... I"- to
Q) C)Q) (f) 0 0 ,.... "It
C .... :t "It 0> N ..;
..0 l'IS Q) ,....
Ec3!;Q "It "It "It "It "It
(l)- V} V} V} V}
. o ....
U .$!
ra
3:
.
M
~
~
.
*
Z
o
~~
:Sz
O:;:l
U~
~:s
~O
~U
~~
~~
cnz
~~
~
.... ....
Q) Q)
:ta..
Q)t)
CI) 0
cU
::E
.... ....
Q) 0
aiLL
3:t)
o
U
-(>')....
CI) ..... 0-
00_
o >.1.1.
Ci5=o
:t E 0
Q)l'IStO
Cl)l.LtO
,....
t)LL
oU
UO
>::0
<5....
Q)
0...
(f)t;:
-0
0_
>.1.1.
=U
Eo
l'ISo
1.1.,....
N
-j
.~ 0
55 ad
u
.~ E
a: :J
.!;I
0>
N
ci
N
~
0>
o
C")
,....
C5
o
o
N
(I)-
<0
o
,....
N
(I)-
i
Q)
c
o
Z
i
<1>
C
o
Z
j
uti
01"-
o (f)
,....(f)
-
N"'"
N ^
""':
,....
(f)-
--
o
I"-
(f)
~
,....
o
to
N
C")
(f)
,....
N
(I)-
<0
I"-
(f)
,....
LO
<0
"It
,....
V}
00
<D
N
N
(I)-
Q)
c
o
Z
13'0
00
00
,.... 00
o..t
0>1"-
(/)- ~
o
..... .....
o 0
00
00
,....00
-
00 "It
01"-
,.... 0
(1)--
o
'0
co
<D
0>
a
to
ci
,....
'^
(f)
C\l
V
C\l
(I)-
(f)
<D
10
,....
LO
<D
v
,....
(/)-
co
l"-
v
C\l
(/)-
Q)
c
o
Z
'On
00
00
,....~
o "It
01"-
~ ~
o
..... .....
o 0
00
00
,....co
-
COv
,....1"-
,.... 0
(1)--
o
13
co
<D
en
(5
10
o
,....
u.
<1>
C
o
on
o
co
"It
r-:
....
~
o
.....
o 0
o
co
'<:I:
l"-
S
v
o
N
,....
I"-
<D
<D
N
(f)-
to
,....
to
,....
<5
o
o
,....
(/)-
o
10
u;
,....
(f)-
.....0
00
00
OtO
:!::I"-
o ....
N Q)
ui E;
'0'0
00
00
.......0
oui"
(f)1"-
W. 0
-
,....
o
q
v
13'0
00
00
....... 0
-
o "It
~ 0
~-
.......
o
to
--
o
o
o
to
-
o
to
.....:
ffl
to
.......
co
N
(f)-
to
<D
,....
-
o
o
o
,....
V)
o
C")
<D
,....
(/)-
<1>
c
o
Z
'On
00
00
,....q
LO"It
(>') ....
(/)-~
o
1313
00
00
:!::q
tOv
~ 0
(1)--
.......
o
to
'0
o
o
10
(5
10
I"-
(I)-
CI)
-
CI)
o
o
>.
1;
(f)
m
en
,....