IDC Agenda 12-19-1991
.
.
.
I
AGEN A
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVE OPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, December 9, 1991 - 7:00 AM
City all
MEMBERS: Chairperson Shelley Jo nson, Don Smith, Ron Hoglund,
Lowell Schrupp, Dale Lun witz, Arve Grimsmo, Jay Morrell,
Harvey Kendall, Dennis aylor, Ken Maus, Linda Mielke,
John McVay, Dave Peters n, Tom Pogatchnik, Bob Dawson,
and Candy Benoit.
Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff 'Neill, and Ollie Koropchak.
STAFF:
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 21, 1991 IDC MINUTES.
3. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW AND CCEPT THE MONTHLY IDC FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
4.
CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW PROCE
A. Previous Year Assessmen
B. Consideration To Review
C. Consideration To Review;
D. Prepare 1991 Activity R
E. Prepare 1992 Economic D
F. Approval by City Counci
G. Copies to the HRA, EDA,
S FOR STAR CITY RECERTIFICATION.
s
Suggested New Goals
Preliminary Proposed Budget
port
velopment Work Plan
(February 10, 1992)
and Chamber Board members
5. CONSIDERATION TO ELECT 1992 DC OFFICERS: CHAIRPERSON, VICE
CHAIRPERSON, AND TREASURER.
6. CONSIDERATION OF CHAMBER MEM ER REPRESENTATION TO THE IDC.
7. CONSIDERATION OF AN UPDATE 0 COMMENT ON THE WRIGHT COUNTY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZ TIONAL STATUS.
8. CONSIDERATION OF A PROSPECT PDATE.
a) AROPLAX CORPORATION
b) ROGERS 20,000 SQ FT MAN FACTURE FACILITY
c) METRO NATIONAL DISTRIBU OR FACILITY
d) OTHERS
9. OTHER BUSINESS.
10. ADJOURNMENT.
NO CHAMBER MEETING IN DECEMBER.
CHAMBER RECOGNITION BANQUET, MONO Y EVENING, JANUARY 27, 1992.
.
.
.
MINU
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL
Thursday, November
City
ES
EVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
1, 1991 - 7:00 AM
all
Chairperson Selley Johnson, Don Smi th, Ron
Hoglund, Joh McVay, Arve Grimsmo, Dennis
Taylor, Lowel: Schrupp, Bob Dawson, Linda
Mielke, and Cndy Benoit.
Dale Lungwi tz I Jay Morrell, Harvey Kendall,
Ken Maus, Dav' Peterson, and Tom Pogatchnik.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
Jeff O'Neill
Koropchak.
STAFF ABSENT:
Rick Wolfstel er.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
Chairperson Shelley Johnson c lIed the IDC meeting to order at
7:00 AM.
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 17 1991 IDC MINUTES.
John McVay made a motion to pprove the October 17, 1991 IDC
minutes, seconded by Linda Mi lke, and with no corrections or
additions the minutes were a proved as written.
3 .
CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW
STAT~::E:\i. s.
ACCEPT YEAR-END FINANCIAL
Koropchak briefly reviewed t e financial reports and stated
that the IDC'S combined Wrig t County and Security Financial
balance as of November, 1 91 is $9,267.50 compared to
December, 1990 of $10,273.61. The 1991 Banquet profit was
$5,010.27 compared to 1990 rofi t of $4,354.68. With the
proposed budget partially co pleted, Koropchak asked the IDC
members for suggested ideas i preparation for the 1992 goals
and budget. It was suggest d to continue the research for
journal advertisement for the proposed budget and a committee
of Shelley Johnson, Don Smit , and Koropchak was recommended
to set 1992 IDC goals with eview by the full committee in
December or January.
Members were asked to keep an open ear for a '92 Banquet
speaker and looked at setting a banquet date. The 5th Monday
in calendar year '92 appear' in August and November, the
members will determine the d te within a short time.
.
IDC MINUTES
11-21-91
4.
CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS MAKE
RECOMMENDATION ON THE CHEL EA LAND
STUDY/CONCEPTUAL AREA PLAN.
FORMAL COMMENT AND
USE AND CIRCULATION
At the October IDC meeting,
member wi th a copy of the
Conceptual Area Plan maps
Amendment. The committee
information for discussion a
I
Jeff O'Neill presented each IDC
Land Use and Circulation Study
and a copy of the Ordinance
as asked to review the given
d comment at November meeting.
Mr. O'Neill informed the IDC hat the given plan is the result
of the All-Government Units eeting held last June, of which,
the IDC members attended. H further informed the IDC of the
Housing and Redevelopment A thority's recommendation of the
plan. Their recommendation as that the northerly 80 acres of
the Kline property be retain d for industrial use. This was
to assure that the ci ty m intains an adequate amount of
acreage for future industr al development with a natural
continuation to the south of the existing industrial park.
.
Originally, the planner ru tIed with this area; however,
proposed Multi-Residential s this would be an ideal buffer
between the industrial par ; the school; and the housing
developments, and because a zone change request from a
Residential zone to an Indstrial zone is easier than vice
versa. Mr. 0' Neill said t e Kline property may be a moot
point as the property is in he township not in the city. In
the meantime, the plann I' is considering the HRA' s
recommendation and is reassessing transportation al ternatives.
The IDC questioned if the 80 acres were not earmarked for
industrial development, what are the alternative areas for
future industrial development? Currently, the city has
approximately 200 acres f available industrial zoned
property, the larger parcel being the Hoglund's 72 acres and
the Farm Credi t' s 100 acr s. The Farm Credit property's
recommended zoning is Light ndustrial/Business Campus (I-BC),
this being the best use of the land and of a higher standard,
yet, not real restrictive. The commi ttee questioned the
Krautbauer property at the i tersection of East County Road 39
and 75 which is zoned PZM, and the city's Remmele property
which is in the township and zoned Agricultural. It is
estimated to extend sanitar sewer to this area of the Hoglund
and city's Remmele prope ties would cost approximately
$250,000.
.
The IDC asked if a would request annexation of the
Kline property, what are te quidelines? The Kline property
being within the OAA and abutting the city proper, a developer
would need a plan which dem nstrates that 80% of the property
.
IDC MINUTES
11-21-91
requested for annexation w uld be developed immediately
(water/sewer/roads, etc.) an that the plans were consistent
with city/county plans. Fro the school's prospective, any
proposed industrial land use' to the school's immediate west
and of the northerly 80 acres of the Kline property would be
watched for compliance with ~he proposed BC Ordinance.
Mr. O'Neill reminded the IDe hat this is a conceptual study
and plan which gives ideas f how land uses relate to one
another and is not a zoning pI n which is an enforcement tool.
Some IDC members felt that t spend $8,000 for a conceptual
land use study was one thingut the important need is to tie
down major transportation ro tes with the development of the
school and the housing project's and to obtain roadway easement
rights for those routes. (Ex mple: proposed continuation of
School Road through Kline pro erty and Kjellberg property to
intersect at State Highway 25).
.
IDC members felt the northerl 80 acres of the Kline property
would be more suitable for ndustrial development with the
restrictions set for property development due to the number of
power and gas lines runnin through this property. Mr.
O'Neill responded, that this is not necessarily true as the
proposed Evergreen's deve opment plan utilized those
restrictions with the devel pment of walkways, parks, or
roads. The IDC agreed that ore information to the location
of power and gas lines s necessary before a final
determination could be made. The proposed School Road along
the southerly boundary of the northerly 80 acres of the Kline
property does indicate a ben to connect with the Kjellberg
development and would serve a a speed control. Additionally,
some IDC members expressed th best land use for the Kjellberg
property was industrial fro ted by commerical along State
Highway 25 thereby giving d rect access to the industrial
areas from Highway 25 via he completion of Dundas Road
assisted by state aid and the proposed School Road which could
serve as a natural buffer to southerly 80 acres of the Kline
property.
.
Mr. O'Neill briefly updat d the IDC on the housing
developments stating Briar 0 ks Phase I is proposed for 28
homes next year and Phase II or an additional 60 lots, price
range from approximately $80, 00 and up. Cardinal Hills Phase
I is proposed for 24 homes w"th six now under construction,
price range as first time horn buyers (approximately 70,000) .
Additional phases included approximately 400 lots for
development and may consti t te the need to create a mixed
housing neighborhood. The Evergreen's plat hasn't been
recorded at the county and orne problems exist because of
..._..____ i
.
.
.
IDC MINUTES
11-21-91
liens against the property nd unknowns of the title. It
appeared to the IDC that the roposed residential land use and
planned developments for the future were in good shape and
therefore it may be wise to safe guard land for industrial
use.
Based on the above discussio 5, it was the general consensus
of the IDC that the northerl 80 acres of the Kline property
be considered for industria use and governed by the BC
Ordinance.
The IDC did not make commen on the proposed Be Ordinance
Amendment.
5.
CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS ANNU L BRE SURVEY AND TEAM VISITS.
One IDC member expressed hi feeling that the industrial
businesses seem to be a world apart from the rest of the
community and questioned if the IDe could actually do anything
about it? One example give was the industrial businesses'
small participation in the United Way Fund Drive. Besides the
geographic division by the freeway, Koropchak noted that a
great percentage of the top company owners or managers of
industrial businesses do no reside wi thin our communi ty;
therefore, little personal c ntact is made in Monticello as
management returns to their re pective homes and they continue
involvement of organizations and activi ties wi thin their
communities.
Koropchak stated that AME Read Mix, Dahlheimer's, Hoglund Bus
Company, and Hoglund Transportation Company have been added to
the survey list. The IDC mem ers suggested Koropchak assign
IDC members to the BRE ind strial visits and notiEy the
members of the date of visit. BRE surveys are due at the
Department of Trade and Econo ic Development on January 15.
6. CONSIDERATION OF A PROSPECT U
a)
Aroplax Corporation - Ko opchak reported the source of
the total project ($925,000) now includes a
reduction in the Bank/SB dollars with the addition of
the $200,000 Economic Re overy Grant application to the
state, an additional request of $25,000 GMEF for a total
of $55,000, and the original TIF injection of $70,000.
This will reduce Aroplax's annual debt service by some
$13,000 to $14,000. Thi suggestion by BDS, Inc. is to
have Monticello I s financi 1 proposal competitive wi th the
Brooklyn Park financial ,proposal. BDS, Inc will make
arrangements for Mr. Pels ring and Koropchak to meet with
the state officials for p eliminary review of the project
.
.
.
IDC MINUTES
11-21-91
and request for $200,000 within the next coming week. If
the dollars are funded b. the Federal government the city
retains the total princilpal and interest payback, and if
funded by State the c ty retains the first $100,000
principal and interest : payback. Koropchak received a
call from Paul Schoen asking for available storage space
for the used presses pur! hased currently by the company.
Suggestions were M&P Transports, Bridge Water Telephone,
and Clow Stamping. Mr. erry Schoen is out-of-town until
December 2. A letter of intent has been prepared and an
attempt to tie down the roject in Monticello is proposed
by BDS and Koropchak.
b) Molded Packaging Produ ts Company - According to Deb
Palmquist, the company has not narrowed the list of
twenty-five potential 10 ations and their site selection
process may have slowed down due the economic status of
our country. John Mc. ay expressed he has heard no
additional information n the process either.
c)
Wafer Manufacturing Com any - Enclosed is a copy of the
letter from Mr. Towers which outlines the consultants
progress for site locati n of this Phase I 450,000 square
foot development, Phase II 300,000 square feet. The
consul tant anticipates nother six to eight weeks to
review all proposals pr'or to any site eliminations.
d) Metro National Distrib tion Warehouse/Office This
privately owned company lans to construct a 60,000 sq ft
facili ty. The company ha three major internal decisions
to be made prior to s rious consideration of a site
location. Koropchak inf rmed the Chief Financial Officer
of the available REA fun s and noted the city nor Bridge
Water has ever applied for the funds. The telephone
company being the applic nt and borrower for the $100,000
interest free loan.
e) Annandale Investor - This Annandale investor works with
businesses interested n leasing facilities and he
becomes the lessor. H is currently working with a
couple of clients and wi 1 contact Monticello before the
holidays.
f)
Maintenance Repair/Offi e Facility This company
represented by a contra tor continues to look at other
alternative options for site location. The contractor
and company are looking or 15 acres for outdoor storage
and the construction of three buildings which total no
more than 20,000 sq ft. he outdoor storage would be for
milling equipment, pavem nt equipment, water tanks, etc.
.
.
.
IDC MINUTES
11-21-91
Inorder to comply with he City's Ordinance for outdoor
storage, the company wo Id need to obtain a conditional
use permit.
g) G & G Oil Company - Encl sed is a copy of the letter from
Mr. Speck noting the com any is no longer in the position
to pursue their reloca! ion plans as the project was
contingent on the sale of their current property which
fell through. In addit.on, he thanked the all persons
for their time, and cknowledged the courteous and
professional treatment eceived.
h) Confidential Office/Di tribution/Warehouse This a
regional company is 100 ing to relocate their business
under one roof and has e pressed interest in a Monticello
location. The contact as been pursued through an IDC
member.
I) John McVay expressed h has been unable to reach the
Micro Tech Company and oropchak noted the out of state
betting facility has be n placed on hold.
7.
OTHER BUSINESS.
The Chamber meeting is
Legion. Program is
scenarios on Illiteracy
8. ADJOURNMENT.
at 11: 50 AM at the American
Coffield, two improvisation
Workplace.
The IDe meeting adjourned at 8:30 AM.
.
.
.
STAR CITY REC RTIFICATION
A.
PREVIOUS YEAR ASSESSMENT.
1) 1990/91 BRE Surveys
2) Self-Assessment Surveys
(December 19th)
3) 1991 Economic Developme
4) 1991/92 BRE Local Surve
t Work Plan by IDC Subcommittee
(January 3th)
Y IDC and Chamber Board members
B.
CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW SUGG STED NEW GOALS.
1) Assignment of IDC membe to an industrial business
2) Creation of ~ S number of recrui ted new industrial
jobs
Encourage the creation
Continue research for J
Analysis Labor Supply:
a) Assess 90/91 BRE S rveys
b) On BRE Visits (Ask Why the Problem)
c) Research and Esta 1 ish a network wi th avai lable
Technical Training and Programs
Research the possi ility to develop a cooperative
work plan between the IDC/School for Industiral
Career Opportuniti s In Monticello
Research the need 0 update the 1988 Labor Survey
to review the City's Capital Improvements Plan.
Industrial relate areas: Upgrade of Fallon
Avenue, Fallon venue Bridge, Dundas Road
Extension, School Road Extension (Right of Way
Easements), Hoglun Property Development (7 Street
Extension and need to upgrade railroad)
When and costs
Report on HRA, EDA, and UDAG Funds
3)
4)
5)
jobs
advertisement
d)
6)
e)
Need
a)
b)
c)
7) Develop critena and reco nize a Local Entrepreneur of the
Year at the IDC Banquet and an IDC Volunteer.
8) Review the process and a alyze the Wright County Economic
Development Plan for co ment and support.
C. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW PREL MINARY PROPOSED BUDGET.
1) Proposed Budget Enclose.
D. PREPARE 1991 ACTIVITY REPORT.
E. PREPARE 1992 ECONOMIC DEVELO MENT WORK PLAN.
1) IDC final review January 16, 1992; EDA, January 28; HRA,
January 15 or February ; and Chamber Board, January 9.
F.
APPROVAL OF THE 1992 ECONO IC DEVELOPMENT WORK PLAN AND
PRESENTATION OF 1991 ACTIVIT REPORT.
1) Approval by City Counei , February 10, 1992.
2) Submitted to the MN Dept of TED, February 15, 1992.
G.
FINAL COpy TO IDC, HRA, EDA, AND CHAMBER BOARD.
MONTICELLO I DUSTRIES
Attached letter mailed on 12/4/91 0:
.
FULFILLMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
JACK PEACH
406 E. 7TH ST.
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-2929
FINGERHUT CORPORATION
DAN JACKSON
PO BOX 10
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-4599
ELECTRO INDUSTRIES, INC./
MEGA PRODUCTS
WILLIAM AND MERRILYN SEEFELDT
2150 WEST RIVER STREET
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-4138
CLOW STAMPING COMPANY
RICK CLOW
218 CHELSEA ROAD
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-5050
.
BONDHUS CORPORATION
JOHN BONDHUS
1349 HART BLVD.
PO BOX 660
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-2162
SMA ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTION
ARLAN WILLE
113 CHELSEA ROAD
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-4367
M & P TRANSPORTS, INC.
JAY MORRELL
1401 FALLON AVENUE
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-3122
.
THE H-WINDOW COMPANY
STEVE LEMME
1324 OAKWOOD DRIVE
PO BOX 206
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-5305
RAINBOW ENTERPRISES
ANDY ANDERSON
108 CHELSEA ROAD
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-1100
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR COMPANY
GREG TOBIAS
1281 SOUTH CEDAR STREET
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-4343
ABK, INC.
JERRY ANDRUSKO
PO BOX 657
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-2133
SUNNY FRESH FOODS
COURTNEY ALLEN
206 WEST 4TH ST., PO BOX 428
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-5666
NORTHERN STATES POWER
NUCLEAR PLANT
DOUG ANTHONY
BOX 600
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-1005
TIRE SERVICE EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC
RAY SCHMIDT
201 CHELSEA ROAD
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-4650
JONES MANUFACTURING
ED JONES
PO BOX 126
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-3246
BRIDGE WATER TELEPHONE COMPANY
BOB RIERSON
316 PINE STREET, PO BOX 298
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-2974
NSP TRAINING CENTER
BOB MCGILLIC
2100 WEST RIVER STREET
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-4141
.
.
.
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIES
PAGE 2
NSP SERVICE CENTER
BOB CLARK
118 DUNDAS ROAD
PO BOX 386
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
TAPPER'S INC.
d.b.a. GENEREUX FINE WOOD
PRODUCTS/WESTLUND DISTRIBUTION
WILLIAM AND BARBARA TAPPER
212 CHELSEA ROAD
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
REMMELE ENGINEERING
PLANT 20
JOE LAVALLE
213 CHELSEA ROAD
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
AME READY MIX
RICHARD MARTIE
PO BOX 247
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-5172
HOGLUND BUS COMPANY, INC.
WAYNE HOGLUND
PO BOX 249
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-5119
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTION
GREG DAHLHEIMER
PO BOX 336
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-3347
HOGLUND TRANSPORTATION, INC.
GORDON AND JEANINE HOGLUND
118 EAST OAKWOOD DRIVE
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
295-3604
11/27/91
.
.
.
LOCAL QUESTIONS CONTINUED.
Because you and your business ar important to the Monticello
Industrial Development Committee (IDC), we are asking for
suggestions on how we may improve ur communications with you and
better serve your needs.
In the past few years, the IDC has osted a Business Retention and
Expansion (BRE) Breakfast which ha been fairly well attended by
the industrial businesses; however, at this time we ask you to give
us further direction by responding to the following questions.
1.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE BRE BREAKFAST CONTINUE?
NO.
IF YES, WHAT IS THE BEST TIME OF THE YEAR?
SUMMER FALL WINTER.
2.
SUGGESTIONS FOR THE BRE PROG
S?
SPRING
YES
WOULD ANY OF THE INFORMATION I EMS LISTED UNDER QUESTION 39 OF
PAGE 12 BE OF INTEREST AS A P OGRAM? YES NO
IF YES, PLEASE LIST IN ORDER F PRIORITY.
3. IN COOPERATION WITH THE ECONO IC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, WOULD
YOUR COMPANY BE WILLING TO OST OTHER INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS
REPRESENTATIVES AND THE ID MEMBERS ON A TOUR OF YOUR
FACILITY? YES NO.
IN COOPERATION WITH THE ECONO IC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, WOULD
YOUR COMPANY BE WILLING TO H ST A LARGER GROUP SUCH AS THE
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ON A TO R OF YOUR FACILITY? YES
NO.
IF YES, WHAT IS THE BEST TIME OF THE YEAR?
SUMMER FALL WINTER.
SPRING
IF YES, WHAT IS THE BEST TIME OF THE DAY? EARLY MORNING
(7: 00 OR 7: 30 am) MORNlNG LUNCH- AFTER LUNCH
____ LATE AFTERNOON~30 OR 5:00 PM).
14
.
.
.
LOCAL QUESTIONS CONTINUED.
4.
!
I
FOR FUTURE PLANNING, WOULD YOU CONSIDER HOSTING A TOUR OF YOUR
FACILITY TO A SMALL GROUP OE INTERESTED AND SELECTED HIGH
SCHOOL STUDENTS? _YES _ NO.
THE OBJECTIVE WOULD BE TO ACQUAINT MONTICELLO JUNIOR AND
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTi~ WITH CAREER OPPORTUNITIES
AVAILABLE WITHIN OUR COMMUN TY AND TO ASSIST INDUSTRIAL
BUSINESSES WHICH MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY IN RECRUITING OR
RETAINING SEMI-SKILLED OR SKI LED POSITIONS.
5. HOW MIGHT THE IDC IMPROVE THEI R ANNUAL RECOGNITION/FUNDRASIER
BANQUET?
6 .
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE ROLE OF THE IDC SHOULD BE?
7.
HOW MIGHT THE IDC BETTER MEET THE NEEDS OF YOUR COMPANY?
8.
THE IDC MEETS ON THE THIRD THURSDAY OF EACH MONTH AT 7:00 AM
IN THE CITY HALL. WOULD YOU I E INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THIS
COMMITTEE AS AN INDUSTRIAL BU~ INESS REPRESENTATIVE? YES
NO.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL' 95-2711, OFFICE OF THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR.
THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING tiN THE 1991/92 BRE SURVEY.
15
.
.
.
GOAL:
OBJECTIVE:
TASKS:
IDC MEMBER B E VISITS
To bridge the gap
the community.
the industrial businesses and
1.
2.
I
To create a s nse of community belonging.
To increase t e industrial business' awareness
of IDC and co munity activities.
To increase the IDC's awareness of the
industrial bu iness operation and needs.
To increase I C membership involvement within
our organizat on.
To obtain an industry I s insight as obtained
from an IDC members in addition to the
industry's i sight as obtained from city
staff.
3.
4.
5.
1.
Assign industries 0 IDC members.
2 .
Periodical calls,
assigned business
at Perkins or lunc
the IDC).
visits, or a tour of your
uring the year. (Maybe coffee
at the River Inn, reimbursed by
3.
Promote, invite, nd accompany assigned business
representative to the BRE Breakfast, the IDC
Banquet, and other IDC functions.
4. Encourage, invi t, and/or accompany assigned
business represent tive to a Chamber meeting or as
appropriate, a Rot ry or other commmunity meeting.
5. Every other month the IDC Agenda will include a
report of findings or information as the result of
your networking.
6. Some structured qu stions will be made available to
IDC members as Ie d-in questions which will serve
beneficial to the DC.
7. IDC members may wo k individually or in pairs if so
desired.
"----
.
.
.
1992 PROPOSED IDC ASSIGN D INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS
SHELLEY JOHNSON
I
JACK PEA H, FULFILLMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
KEN MAUS
1'- 'A '{ 'vv\ 0'<'''' .. \ t
DAN JACK ON, FINGERHUT CORPORATION
ED JONES JONES MANUFACTURING
HARVEY KENDALL
RON HOGLUND
ANDY AND RSON, RAINBOW ENTERPRISES
BOB MCGI LIC, NSP TRAINING CENTER
RICHARD ARTIE, AME READY MIX
LOWELL SCHRUPP
RICK CtO , CLOW STAMPING
JOHN MCVAY
DAVE PETERSON
JOHN BOND US, BONDHUS CORPORATION
STEVE LE ME, THE H-WINDOW COMPANY
\<..~ Y\, \f't\ ~c s
GREG TO lAS, AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR
COMPANY
DENNIS TAYLOR
DON SMITH
JERRY AND ABK, INC.
COURTNEY LLEN, SUNNY FRESH FOODS, INC.
TOM POGATCHNIK
DALE LUNGWITZ
NY, NSP NUCLEAR PLANT
RAY SCHMIDT, THE TIRE SERVICE EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTU ING COMPANY, INC.
LINDA MIELKE
WILLIAM A D BARB TAPPER, TAPPER'S INC.
d.b.a. GENEREUX FINE WOOD
PRODUCTS/ ESTLUND DISTRIBUTION
ARVE GRIMSMO
CANDY BENIOT
JOE LAVAL E, REMMELE ENGINEERING PLANT 20
BOB RIERSON, BRIDGE WATER TELEPHONE
COMPANY
MARY MICKE
WILLIAM ND MERRILYN SEEFELDT, ELECTRO
INDUSTRIE /MEGA PRODUCTS
CYNDIE JOHNSON
BOB CLARK NSP SERVICE CENTER
OLLIE KOROPCHAK
ARLAN WIL IE, SMA ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTION
JAY MORRE L, M & P TRANSPORTS, INC.
WAYNE HOG UND, HOGLUND BUS COMPANY, INC.
GREG DAHL EIMER, DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTION
GORDON A D JEANINE HOGLUND, HOGLUND
TRANSPORT TION, INC.
AND ALL 0 HERS.
mm.. I
_.
, ~
. MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL EVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
YEAR END FINANC AL COMPARISON
MARCH 19 7 MARCH 1988 JANUARY 1989
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
CHECKING ACCOUNT $ 159. $ 284.88 $ 314.05
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
MONEY MARKET $ 3,560. $ 5,702.96 $16,296.97
SECURITY FINANCIAL
MONEY MARKET $ 3,366. $ 3,534.60 $ 3,693.86
YEARS TOTAL BALANCE $ 7,086. $ 9,522.44 $20,304.88
DECEMBER 1989 DECEMBER 1990 NOVEMBER 1991
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
CHECKING ACCOUNT $ 24. $ 86.15 CLOSED
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
MONEY MARKET $ 7,957. $ 6,104.95 $ 6,237.40
SECURITY FINANICAL
MONEY MARKET $ $ 4,082.51 $ 3,030.10
4ItEARS TOTAL BALANCE
$10,273.61 $ 9,267.50
.
,. "
. 199
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL EVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
PROPOSED ,BUDGET
1990 ACTUAL 1991 PRO OSED 1991 ACTUAL 1992 PROPOSED
BALANCE $11,903.80 $10,273. 1 $10,273.61 $ 9,267.50
REVENUE:
Banquet $ 6,650.00 $ 7,000. $ 7,000.00 $ 8,000.00
300.00(89) 75. 75.00(90)
City Contrib $ 5,400.00(89) $ 5,650. $ 5,650.00(90) $ 5,950.00(91)
Chamber Contr $ 2,800.00(89) $ 2,800. $ 2,800.00(90) $ 2,800.00(91)
Interest $ 373.28 $ 400. $ 374.67 $ 400.00
Video Contr $ 3,425.00
TOTAL REVENUE $27,427.08 1 $29,598.28 $26,417.50
EXPENDITURES:
Salary $13,719.87(89) $13,215. $13,215.96(90) $14,576.69(91)
Banquet $ 2,370.32 $ 2,000. $ 1,989.72 $ 2,250.00
Appraisal $ 400.00 $ 0 $ 0 0
Travel Exp $ 20.00 $ 200.' $ 0 0
Prospects S 310.34 $ 500. S 160.70 S 500.00
. Membership $ 95.00 $ 200. $ 95.00 $ 95.00
Seminars $ 0 $ 250. $ 0 0
Marketing Pro $ 0 $ 1,000. $ 4,700.00 $ 1,500.00
BRE $ 160.00 $ 500. 0 $ 169.40 $ 500.00
MISCELLANEOUS $ 72.35 $ 1,000.00 $ 0 $ 1,000.00
Service Chg $ 5.00 25. 0 $ 0 0
TOTAL EXPEND $17,152.88 $18,890. 6 $20,330.78 $20,421.69
BALANCE $10,273.61 $ 7,307.65 $ 9,267.50 $ 5,995.81
.
i
III , .' ~
~ ,
~
MONTICELLO
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
Fax:. (612) 295-4404
Senator Betty Adkins
1655 Kadler Avenue Northeast
St. Michael, MN 55376
Dear Senator Adkins and Family:
December 6, 1991
On behalf of the Monticello Industria Development committee and myself,
I wish to express our deepest sympath to you and your family on the loss
of Susan and Ryan. It becomes diffic It at times for the human mind to
understand such losses, but somehow a d somewhere in time we're able to
accept and within our hearts we cheri h the good times and the memories.
.
May the Spirit of peace be with your family.
Respectfully,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
($).90 . .Q.; ~~~ ~~
Ollie Koropchak
Economic Development Director
.