Loading...
Planning Commission Agenda 09-03-2019AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September 3rd, 2019 - 6:15 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Paul Konsor, and Alison Zimpfer Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Jacob Thunander, Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Regular Meeting Minutes — August 6th, 2019 C. Citizen Comments D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda E. Consideration to approve agenda 2. Public Hearings A. Continued Public Hearing — Consideration of an amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 Overlay Zoning Districts, Subsection (E) Wild and Scenic Recreational River District for height allowances. Applicant: City of Monticello B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 875 square foot residential detached Accessory Use Structure — Major in an R-1 (Single-Family Residence) District. Applicant: Mick Herold 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration appoint Chairman Sam Murdoff to the Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisory Committee B. Consideration of the Community Development Directors Report 4. Added Items 5. Adjournment MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 6th, 2019 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Paul Konsor, and Alison Zimpfer Commissioners Absent: Sam Murdoff Council Liaison Present Staff Present: 1. General Business A. Call to Order Charlotte Gabler Angela Schumann and Steve Grittman (NAC) John Alstad called the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 6 p.m. B. Consideration of Oath of Office John Alstad read the Oath of Office to Paul Konsor. Konsor agreed to the terms. C. Consideration of approvin� minutes a. Re�ular Meetin� Minutes — Julv 2nd, 2019 MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — JULY 2ND, 2019. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. b. Special Meetin� Minutes — Julv 15th, 2019 (D MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES — 7ULY 15TH, 2019 (I). PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. c. Special Meetin� Minutes — Julv 15th, 2019 (II) MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES — 7ULY 15TH, 2019 (I�. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. D. Citizen Comments None. E. Consideration of addin� items to the a�enda Angela Schumann recommended adding an item into the Director's Report for the Comprehensive Plan. F. Consideration to approve a�enda MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. 2. Public Hearings A. Continued Public Hearin� - Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for a residential detached Accessorv Use Structure — Maior in an R-1 (Sin�le-Familv Residence) District Applicant: Jerome Buboltz Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 1 � 7 Steve Grittman explained the request for CUP for the construction of a garage at 1312 West River Street. The proposed accessory use structure met the code for height, location and use. It was noted that the property does fall within the City's Shoreland regulations. The applicant proposed a 36 by 26 foot garage, which varied from the original submittal. Grittman explained the CUP criteria per the Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommended approval of the application subj ect to the conditions in Exhibit Z. Paul Konsor asked if the structure would have plumbing or electrical. Grittman declined that the structure would have plumbing. Jerome Buboltz, the applicant, indicated that electrical would be outside the doors. Buboltz indicated that the garage would be used to store outdoor equipment. He also noted that he would be residing his house and that the garage would match. Konsor asked if there would be floor drains in the garage. Buboltz declined. John Alstad asked if there would be any vehicle storage in the detached structure. Buboltz declined. Charlotte Gabler asked what the setback of the structure would be. Grittman explained that it was shown at 20 feet of the east property line. Alstad asked the applicant if he was familiar with Exhibit Z comments. Buboltz agreed to the terms. Marc Simpson asked if the existing shed would be torn down first. Buboltz declined, but stated it would be removed once the new shed was constructed. He did not want to store any of his outdoor equipment outside. Candace Johnson, 1233 Sandy Lane, was concerned about the size of the structure. She asked for clarification to the CUP requirements per the zoning ordinance. Johnson was also concerned with a business running out of the structure. Buboltz explained that he would not run a business out of the property and that he was hoping to retire soon. Marc Simpson asked if a home business was something that the city could enforce. Grittman confirmed, but noted that the City is on a complaint basis. Staff commented on Ms. Johnson's concerns. They noted that the application fit all of the criteria for CUP. Staff agreed that the size of the garage was large. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Decision 1. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Use Structure — Major in an R-1 District Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 2 � 7 MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PG2019-023 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE DETACHED ACCESSORY USE STRUCTURE - MAJOR, SUB7ECT TO THE CONDITIONS 1N EXHIBIT Z, AND BASED ON FINDINGS 1N SAID RESOLUTION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. EXHIBIT Z Jerome Buboltz Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Use Structure — Major 1312 West River Street 1. The existing detached accessory building must be removed. 2. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. The accessory building shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials including color, and including the addition of brick to the front fa�ade of accessory structure similar to the of the home. 4. Access to the structure will remain on the property, with no rear yard driveway. 5. A revised certificate of survey and staking of property lines and setbacks will be required at building permit to verify structure size consistent with the provided building plans, setback requirements, including compliance with floodplain, Shoreland, and Mississippi Wild Scenic and Recreational River District setback requirements. 6. No overstory trees should be removed without City administrative approval. 7. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. B. Public Hearin� - Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for Parkin� Stall Desi�n & Preliminarv and Final Plat for Savitski Commercial Applicant: DJ's Properties, LLC Steve Grittman provided the staff report. He indicated that the subj ect property was split up into five parcels and it was intended to replat to make one parcel. Staff originally thought that the parking dimensions would require a Conditional Use Permit, but it was noted that the development would be compliant with that condition. Staff recommended paving and curbing all parking areas. It was noted that the current parking encroaches in the railroad property. It was recommended to remove the paving and restripe. John Alstad asked what types of businesses were surrounding. Grittman noted that there were banks, multitenant offices, multifamily, and single family homes. Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 3 � 7 Paul Konsor asked for when the timelines of the conditions of approval would have to be met. Staff would review at the time of building permits. The CUP's have one year to construction from approval. John Alstad opened the public hearing. Donald Savitski, applicant, introduced himself. He noted that the proposed addition would be 6,100 square feet. Alstad asked why he was moving his business to Monticello. Savitiski noted that his business has been in Monticello for some time, but he also has an Albertville location. He would like to consolidate his business to one location. Alstad asked if the applicant had reviewed the Exhibit Z comments. Savitiski confirmed. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed. MARK SINIPSON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2019-024, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR 414 SOUTH PINE STREET, WITH THE CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED 1N EXHIBIT Z. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. EXHIBIT Z Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review 414 Pine Street Lot 1, Block 1, Savitski Commercial (proposed) 1. Relocate south existing parking area to a point off of the Sth Street right of way, and restripe to 90 degree parking. Staff encourages the applicant to modify the parking to meet setback if possible and add curb — these latter suggestions are advisory only. 2. Eliminate outdoor storage with the note that the applicant proposed to retain firewood storage on the north side of the building within an existing fenced area. Firewood storage is allowed in all zoning districts up to a maximum of ten cords. 3. Eliminate storage sheds. 4. Maintain interior trash handling. 5. Specify areas of possible showroom/retail floor meet: a. Maximum storage area of 35% of building (some shared with retail is acceptable). b. Maximum fabrication area of 40% c. Applicant will prepare floor plan showing compliance. Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 4 � 7 6. Staff encourages the applicant to consider the addition of up to 6 trees to meet total tree planting requirements on site — this suggestion is advisory only. 7. Building materials to match/coordinate color of main building. 8. Lighting - Applicant will prepare a record of existing lighting and any new lighting proposed, consistent with the requirements of the ordinance. 9. Signage — Applicant will prepare a record of existing signage on the property. Additional signage to be reviewed separately if desired. 10. Outdoor sales and display to occur consistent with the allowances for sidewalk outdoor display only. The applicant should define any proposed display on an updated site plan. 11. Compliance with City Engineer letter dated July 24th, 2019. 12. Compliance with MnDOT's comment letter of July 20th, 2019 13. Execution of required plat development and encroachment agreements, as applicable. 14. Other staff comments. C. Public Hearin� - Consideration of an amendment to Monticello Zonin� Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 Overlav Zonin� Districts, Subsection (E) Wild and Scenic Recreational River District for hei�ht allowances. Applicant: Citv of Monticello Angela Schumann explained the staff report. She noted that the height allowance in the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River District is 25 feet. City Council asked the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing. The recommendation was to allow 35 feet in both the MWSRRD and Shoreland District. It was noted that in some areas the shoreland district extends 1,000 feet past the shoreline. Schumann noted that the code was recodified in 2012, and was adopted at 25 feet to ease in administration. The item came to light after consideration for the Headwater's Development proposal for senior living. The 25 feet recommendation is consistent with the DNR standards. Charlotte Gabler asked if this affects any previous variance approvals. Schumann indicated that the variance stands, but is unnecessary if the amendment were approved. Paul Konsor asked why it was important to amend the ordinance. He also asked if this was a way to avoid more variance requests. Schumann confirmed and noted that the proposed ordinance amendment would be consistent with the DNR. John Alstad opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 5 � 7 Marc Simpson asked how many years the regulations had been in place. Schumann noted that in the 1970's the creation of the MWSRRD and Shoreland District were created. Monticello's code was amended in 2011. Schumann noted that since the staff report was created, staff received preliminary approval for the request from the DNR. JOHN ALSTAD TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO TABLE ACTION ON THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS 1N THE MISSISSIPPI WILD AND SCENIC RECREATIONAL RIVER OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR CONSIDERATION AS NOTED. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. �, 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of adoptin� Resolution PC-2019-025, a Resolution Findin� that the Proposed Convevance of Certain Land bv the Citv of Monticello and Citv of Monticello Economic Development Authoritv is Consistent with the Citv of Monticello Comprehensive Plan Angela Schumann provided the staff report. She explained that the conveyance of property was to facilitate development of a light manufacturing facility. The building would be 40,000 square feet and create 60 full time jobs. The site located on Chelsea Road was identified by the company as suitable. The City would then sell a parcel on Edmonson Avenue for residential development. Staff were looking for a motion to approve a resolution finding the transfer of land consistent to comprehensive plan. Staff recommended approval and noted the increase in tax base and jobs in support of the Comprehensive Plan. JOHN ALSTAD MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PG2019-025, A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN LAND BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND CITY OF MONTICELLO IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. B. Consideration of the Communitv Development Directors Report Angela Schumann provided the Community Development Director's Report. She explained that the Lakota Group and WSB would be completing a visioning session and comprehensive plan update. She noted that the Planning Commission should mark their calendars for a community celebration on Saturday, September 7th. This would be a kick off for the visioning session. Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 6 � 7 Schumann also explained a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and City Council would occur on either September Sth or 6th. A bus tour would also be held that same day. More information would be distributed when available. It was noted that Sam Murdoff would serve on the Technical Advisory Committee for the Planning Commission. John Alstad would be an alternative if needed. Schumann indicated that the City Administrator provides community tours to new members of the Planning Commission. If interested, members should contact staff to set a time up. Schumann explained that the City received an application for a digital billboard. Staff understand that the request is a permitted use of an existing billboard and can be replaced. The sign cannot be larger than existing. Discussion occurred regarding having MnDOT approval and verification of illumination standards being met. 4. Added Items None. 5. Adjournment � MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 74:29 P.M. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. Recorder: Approved Attest: Jacob Thunander September 3rd, 2019 Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 7 � 7 Planning Commission Agenda: 09/03/19 2A. Continued Public Hearin� - Consideration of an amendment to Monticello Zonin� Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 Overlav Zoning Districts, Subsection (E) Wild and Scenic Recreational River District for hei�ht allowances. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Planning Commission opened and continued the public hearing on this item in August. The Commission expressed general support for the amendment, but tabled action to allow staff to provide the conditional approval letter received from the DNR. During the June 24th, 2019 City Council meeting and the July 15th, 2019 Planning Commission meeting it was explained that the current height limit within the city's Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational Overlay District (MWSRR) ordinance is 25' for principal structures. When the MWSRR ordinance was adopted in 1978, the structure height was set at 35', in accordance with MN Rules for the Wild and Scenic District. The City recodified its zoning ordinance in 2009-2010. At that time, the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River District and Shoreland Ordinance as previously adopted by the City was incorporated by reference and left unamended. The previous version of the ordinance adopted by reference included both the MWSRR and Shoreland District regulations in one ordinance. However, the MWSRR and Shoreland Districts are two separate sets of statutes and rules. In 2011, the City began work with the DNR to update the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River District and Shoreland ordinances to incorporate the two overlay districts within the code and separate the regulations. Both the Shoreland and MWSRR require review and certification by the DNR. The current MN Rules for MWSRR sets a height allowance at 35' for structures, while MN Rules for Shoreland height is currently 25' for residential structures. However, in the 2011-2012 city recodification process for these two ordinances, the principal structure height for both the MW SRR and Shoreland was set at 25', such that the height allowance would be consistent between the two districts. In summary, this 25' standard as noted in the city ordinance is consistent with MN Rules for the Shoreland District, but 10' lower than the height that would be allowable under the MWSRR. The consistent 25' standard does not address the variation in distance and associated uneven impact on parcels within the MWSRR designation versus the Shoreland District. An ordinance amendment setting height standard based on proximity to the shore would address this condition. It is important to note that the Shoreland Overlay District in Monticello includes all land within 1,000 feet of the Ordinary High Water (OHW) of a lake and 300 feet from a river or stream, or the landward extent of its designated floodplain, whichever is greater. The MWSRR applies to a specific geographic area as determined by maps adopted into Minnesota Rules and is, in the majority, inclusive of the Shoreland Overlay along the Mississippi River. It appears that in areas outside of the core city as of 1978, the MSWRR boundary was set by section or quarter section line. As such, portions of the MWSRR extend as much as 2000' from the Shoreland Overlay boundary, and in some locations, as little as 200 feet. By considering the amendment, there is an argument that Planning Commission Agenda: 09/03/19 the ordinance would mitigate some of the inherent inequities that result from the MWSRR boundary. Based on this understanding the Council has asked that staff begin to work with the DNR on an ordinance amendment and that the Planning Commission hold a hearing on an amendment. The amendment would require compliance with the 25' height requirement within the Shoreland Overlay District, consistent with MN Rules for the Shoreland District, while for areas outside of the Shoreland, but within the MWSRR, allow for heights up to 35'. The City has received comment from the DNR on the proposed amendment. The DNR has provided a letter of conditional approval for the proposed amendment. The letter is attached for reference. Pending action by the Planning Commission and City Council, staff will provide final ordinance language to the DNR. Certification of the DNR is required for this ordinance amendment. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment for height requirements in the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River Overlay District as proposed, based on findings in resolution PC-2019-026. 2. Motion to recommend denial of the ordinance amendment for height requirements in the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River Overlay District as proposed, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. Motion to table for additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approval of the ordinance. The ordinance amendment is consistent with state rules for height in the MWSRR. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution PC-2019-026 B. Draft Ordinance C. Draft Ordinance Reference D. Area Map - Proposed Amendment E. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, MW SRR Height and Shoreland Height F. Shoreland Height, MN Rules G. Wild and Scenic Recreational Height, MN Rules H. DNR Letter of Conditional Approval CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-026 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REVISING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS IN THE MISSISSIPPI WILD AND SCENIC RECREATIONAL RIVER (MWSRR) OVERLAY DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the requirements and intent of the MWSRR regulations statutes and rules; and WHEREAS, the required limitations to height for buildings in the MWSRR accommodate building heights of up to 35 feet; and WHEREAS, the Shoreland Overlay District, which overlaps portions of the MSWRR requires building limitations of no more than 25 feet; and WHEREAS, the portions of the MWSRR which are not also part of the Shoreland Overlay District are currently subj ect to a height requirement of 25 feet, whereas state rules would permit the higher 35 foot standard; and WHEREAS, buildings in the MWSRR which are not also part of the Shoreland Overlay District are unduly burdened by the lower Shoreland height standards; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello's land use and economic development objectives, as stated in the Comprehensive Plan and other policy documents, are difficult to achieve when subj ect to the height limitations noted above; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance protects the Mississippi River in accordance with both the MW SRR and Shoreland obj ectives; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 3rd, 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the intent and requirements of both the State of Minnesota Shoreland Management Act and the MWSRR rules and regulations as determined by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-026 2. The proposed amendment continues the City's policy of both protecting the Mississippi River as a vital natural resource and as an economic development asset. 3. The proposed amendment is consistent with the plans and policies as stated in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposed amendment will better regulate buildings in those areas where the Shoreland Overlay District is not applicable. 5. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources had stated its approval of the proposed amendment and the standards it sets, subj ect to formal DNR process requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the amendment to the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River Overlay District, establishing a 35 foot height requirement in those areas of the District that are not impacted by the Shoreland Management regulations. ADOPTED this 3rd day of September, 2019 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING CONINIISSION By: Sam Murdoff, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DEFINING AND REGULATING EVENT CENTERS, PLACES OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY, AND RELATED LAND USES Section 1. Section 2. Section 2. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: Section 3.7(E)(9) is hereby amended to read as follows: (9) Building Height The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the WSRR overlay district: (a) The maximum height of principal structures shall not exceed �35 feet e, xceUt that the maximum hei�ht for principal structures shall not exceed 25 feet when such structure is subiect to the requirements of the Shoreland Overlav District, in which case the requirements of the Shoreland District shall apply. (b) The maximum height of accessory structures shall not exceed 25 feet. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor CHAPiER 3: Z�NiIVC; DISTR(CTS Section 3J Overlay Zoning Districts Subsection (E) Wild and Scenic Recreational River District (e) Impervious surface requirements (i) Impervious surfaces on lots within the WSRR overlay district shall adhere to the following standards: L Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the lot area. 2. When constructed facilities are used for storm water management, they must be designed and installed consistent with the field office technical guide of the local soil and water conservation districts. 3. New constructed storm water outfalls to public waters must provide for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge. (ii) The provisions of subdivision (i) above may be varied without a variance if all of the following criteria and standards are met: 1. All structures and impervious surfaces are located on slopes less than 12 percent. The physical alteration of slopes shall not be permitted for the purpose of overcoming this limitation. 2. The site development is designed, implemented, and maintained using the most applicable combination of comprehensive practices that prevent flooding, pollutant, erosion and sedimentation problems consistent with Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas: Best Management Practices for Minnesota, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, October 1989, or as amended, which is incorporated by reference, available at the state law library and not subject to frequent change. 3. A site development, maintenance, and inspection plan incorporating the comprehensive practices of this section is submitted and approved by the city prior to the issuance of an impervious surfacing permit and the plan is implemented. 4. The city may impose additional conditions determined necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. (9) Building Height The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the WSRR overlay district: (a) The ma�mum height of principal structures shall not exceed 3�5 feet ���.e� �� i�i�t �Fie r�taxirrium hei i�._�princi�ral siructures shail r�oi exceed 2� �ee� �-ihen such structure is subject to the requirements of the Shoreland Overl��_ District, in which case the requirements of the Shoreland District shall a�lz . City of Monticello Zoning Ordinan�� Page I 79 - ------- � i �`i I •I�,�'�;,� � N � � ` ,� a �:zt � ;1^� ¢_ I � ; %"� � � x �+�' - � ��. � �? � v �`�! I -- "` � � � � � a = I �' � oi o� � P� "' `� ' �� �,r -- I'' . ' ' � � . 'c = = m �'�.. _� � ! . Y . . ' '�. . t 1 �' � � � O LL � � �a .. . �y,.. � � '.a�.r,w..�i ' � . - f � � � N C C � �/ �.`, ��I���4. y ' ' P� � N w '� 'O 'O M O ,� . ' �` � C � @ m m � � : � - - f ;� 46`_`e , � �----�--, -� i"�! �� .-r �: 'o o a u i �� ;� . .- c ��`•� m � � o o � '�s� _ � � i� �• ;,,�. a LL � � hf�.� e�� �' F +ir-�.� �i �' o z in �n _ �� d t . f'�.�^ .. ` � •�� .� J V M � N M ' � � � � .. . i— . . ff r � � '�_ �F. �� , _ ks 1" ' t I� � O � � ..u3' �- y�� �. — _ _ ._.A�..L _ � � I � � � t ' — =.�_ '1�� i �_ �,i^ +�-�` i_— � '�( � �; � � 'a� _'.�o � h r' 1.. - - _ � . : . z < d_ e .: . • -�°�.�"a,� �N 7 ,� . � � ,.. . ;; y .. - .!�' __. - .i�d, '1�,• , . � '���4 �„'� � '� 1�� ,��;'�£; � 4, �ia� �• f ' �l'� L., --�i` ! � fi � '� � i_i I ���� • I 0.�a .� � .� . 1 ' ' . _ _ . yA_..3°.i�+'�k�2� � Y�.Si�._�-�v4F�^.':. '.� � V�. �., � 7 i �. ���� �,n•p+v= '�%.J J" � •��� . .. - �������� �+,. `�_ � �; �' � � (, -_ � � ,� �1.�, � �� � � =� . ,�� � ' , ► ,�� �� 1 �� _,��. • _ _ !� ° �` .a�,; � s �, � � - � . - � • i . � �� � � � �� . __ , �.� �� ' '� � � � � : � i � � — =�a�� � �, � � � � �� � h £ �': `_ , � . � � � f��-.. �° --- - - �.r � .• �p I .•,r' m - �- �i" 1' "_ .'- . ° � �i r �� +y', I , � � � N� �" _ _ _ �i l_ .. � f . I F � •�� � � � � � d : Y�. � � � � ""'1 .. - __ , ' , "ai, ,.: �, .� 1 _ . � _ �'�'�. . �.Z- . _ i. �.� I - '� �.. /�� � � � ' ! . . • . ` �- - - - - • �� -_ _ �°-_. . - n ��i y'r�''/ _ .^'�p� ' • a+ I, . �• ++ : �� - - � �l". � ✓ � A . �.-� _ JI C> f.�` r� s � .� �., 'tiJ. � �. . /� N � �- � ���n� �j �� ,.. . - .a' r ^ ' a� .p.. Q r � � �r ' S`.�°' ",�°t�°';^ i� . i � v _ . € ,er i� 1� G � ' 'n,4,e� � � . _ � _ • - . Y +n djt{�.:,f��i f 4_. .- . . � ti :� � .� Y 1 � .�^�: �� . ' �� ' � �Y�— G1 c F�a" ,�t �'�l��.Ji�, � , � . 4•: " } I�� ' � � ' N � � � �' , � � .. �� • .f f �� ,_a . _ �: �z « . . , . � � � x:��� �, .. � � o� . _._ „ ; � � � o , _ 1' '�. , _,�� !C � � . � � �'.; : .� , i . � v u . � �I - �' _ . - . m 0 . . i� ` � q'�. , I . �I �:��, . � � � . . `r . , -. a - � b .�, r - �+ p _ ' " I � �I � � � 1, �:.�. :��� I — �� � � " \ • � � O . ,� " . .__. �• i�.'�La�^' .... � O � . Il '!: . i - n.�Y 5.�� ♦ _ •� M ' . �` \.. - � . 1�.{'{� 1� T � , r _ �� � � � �I� `� �tT_�.��' i r -.-� � � I�-' . �'. �� ., � �� I-• � y:. .ri' _ a� .; � , � ; , _ „ � - � -�. �. ��,� - �: � ,, '�j . ' ^� �-.f • � ,�,��. _-, ' � ' _ - ----'�: . C r 4� �%." • ' "�`,•l+�. - �. � r. � ��. ,�.o..� 3 � ' � � �� i � ,., �� _ ��� m �d 'A' ' 1 '"r'ti.:�� +,' / v. ✓ � :i. � `? -- ' � ' . • . r r .�ii. "R� ,I /,� � �'' ���,�• -/ R�M ... �'. � ',a �` ; yr `� ' Si� � � � . ,: � }\� �i._ �!, �_�� !ir iyl � - � ' �. �� � ���I*•� _ � .� 1. , 4. � � ��_ . � �: .� � _ �ti t� _' 'b,% . / � s t"� � � , � �� j 1 ^� �. ..�; � � , • • . �_ ,� � � ' .L -/� �� ' � y .' � . �. v - � � • r .,���: " � .�— � ��' � ., ui, ',� ~i�: . • �i� ' F - � ` '•s «.� , ,�,�r. _ _1% . � �'- '- , ' �` � - f+� � . �* �4- .. ' ' '�'• . .. �-.�� '�, y �'''k � ��t ib " '" �' �' � -.;. rt �''��, „ . ,�' , r . _ °�' . •. t � �� e ,� � , t1►; ` �'� Y ,. ,. _ � ,.�' , �r ' ' � Yi� � � yu,.i • � • • . � r �=, � _ ^ 1! � �.� r ti�- N�. .� R_. `�: ♦! ' .'4 �l_ �� O �ii ���^�'� . _ ':� . � w 1.' _„ � - ��• � � " s�s' � � �1�. �l: � i ti , ��► ��•�,� ' •./' T',"'C • _ ��' _•� "�`="l - �. . . - - . � � . -C; � - � . : r " .. - - o ��/ � �E ,;'�- y r. ' .,� • �,a � � � y . � �1'�, _;�_ , '' �,' � � � � CHAP1"ER 3: ZONtNG D1S7'RICTS Sedion 3.7 Gverlay Zoning Disirict� Subsectiori (E) Wild and Scenic Recreatiorial River Uistrict (e) Impervious surface requirements (i) Impervious surfaces on lots within the WSRR overlay district shall adhere to the following standards: 1. Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the lot area. 2. When constructed facilities are used for storm water management, they must be designed and installed consistent with the field office technical guide of the local soil and water conservation districts. 3. New constructed storm water outfalls to public waters must provide for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge. (ii) The provisions of subdivision (i) above may be varied without a variance if all of the following criteria and standards are met: 1. All structures and impervious surfaces are located on slopes less than 12 percent. The physical alteration of slopes shall not be pern�itted for the purpose of overcoming this limitation. 2. The site development is designed, implemented, and nlaintained using the most applicable combination of comprehensive practices that prevent flooding, pollutant, erosion and sedimentation problems consistent with Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas: Best Management Practices for Minnesota, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, October 1989, or as amended, which is i�lcarporated by reference, available at the state law library and not subject to frequent change. 3. A site development, maintenance, and inspection plan incorporating the comprehensive practices of this section is submitted and approved by the city prior to the issuance of an impervious surfacing pernlit and the plan is implemented. 4. The city may impose additiona] conditions determined necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. (9) Building Height The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the WSRR overlay district: (a) The inaximum height of principa] structures shall not exceed 25 feet. (b) The maxinlum height of accessory structures shall »ot exceed 25 feet. City of /�ontrcello 7_onir�g Grdincnce Pag� �%9 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3. 7 Overlay Zoning Districts Subsection (F) Shoreland C)istrict (c) Non-residential District Lot Standards (i) Minimum lot standards for non-residential zoned properties shall be as dictated by the requirements for the underlying zoning district classification. (ii) All structures and sepric systems within non-residential districts shall comply with the structural setback standards for such features as listed in Tables 3-24, 3-25 and 3-26. (d) Bluff Impact Zones Structures or facilities, except stairways and landings, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. (e) Height of Structures (i) No structures, e�cept for churches and non-residential agricultural structure�s, shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. (ii) Detached accessory structures shall not exceed fifteen (l5) feet in height. (t) iJses Without Water-Oriented Needs Uses without water-oriented needs are encouraged to locate on lots or parcels without public water frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public water frontage, must either be setback double the normal ordinary high water level setback or be substantially screened fi-om view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. Gty of P�ionticello Zcning Ordinonce Page 201 2 REVISOR 6105.011 0 C. Placement of structures. Structures shall not be located on slopes greater than 13 percent unless such structures can be screened and sewage disposal system facilities can be installed so as to comply with the sanitary provisions in part 6105.0120. Where a floodplain ordinance exists, no structure shall be located in the floodway of a stream as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 103F.111, subdivision 5, and furthermore shall be placed at an elevation consistent with any such applicable floodplain management ordinances. Where no floodplain ordinances exist, the elevation to which the lowest floor of a structure, including a basement, shall be placed, shall be detennined after an evaluation of available flood information and shall be consistent with the statewide standards and criteria for management of floodplain areas of Minnesota. D. Structure height shall not exceed 35 feet. Statutory Authority: MS s 104.34; 103F.321 Published Electronically: June 11, 2008 Copyright G2008 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of'Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 8 REVISOR 6120.3300 D. Steep slopes. Local government officials must evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development visibility from public waters before issuing a permit for construction of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on steep slopes. When determined necessary, conditions must be attached to issued permits to prevent erosion and to preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation. E. Proximity to unplatted cemeteries and significant historic sites. No structure may be placed nearer than 50 feet from the boundary of an unplatted cemetery protected under Minnesota Statutes, section 307.08, unless necessary approval is obtained from the Minnesota State Archaeologist's Office. No structure may be placed on a significant historic site in a manner that affects the values of the site unless adequate information about the site has been removed and documented in a public repository. F. Proximity to roads and highways. No structure may be placed nearer than 50 feet from the right-of-way line of any federal, stat�e, or county highway; or 20 feet from the right-of-way line of any town road, public street, or others not classified. G. Height. All structures in residential districts in cities, except churches and nonresidential agricultural structures, must not exceed 25 feet in height. H. Accessory structures and facilities. All accessory structures and facilities, except those that are water-oriented, must meet or exceed structure setback standards. If allowed by local government controls, each residential lot may have one water-oriented accessory structure or facility located closer to public waters than the structure setback if all of the following standards are met: (1) The structure or facility must not exceed ten feet in height, exclusive of safety rails, and cannot occupy an area greater than 250 square feet. Detached decks must not exceed eight feet above grade at any point. (2) The setback of the structure or facility from the ordinary high water level must be at least ten feet. (3) The structure or facility must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the local unit of government, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. (4) The roof may be used as a deck with safety rails, but must not be enclosed or used as a storage area. (5) The structure or facility must not be designed or used for human habitation and must not contain water supply or sewage treatment facilities. Copyright OO 2015 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. �DEPARTMENT OF NATU RAL R ESOU RCES Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Ecological and Water Resources 16543 Haven Rd. Little Falls, MN 56345 August 2, 2019 Angela Schumann Community Development Director 505 Walnut St. Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Conditional Approval of City of Monticello's Wild & Scenic River Ordinance Amendment Dear Ms. Schumann, Thank you for sending your proposed Wild & Scenic River ordinance amendment to the DNR for conditional approval review. I am pleased to inform you that the proposed amendment is substantially compliant with the statewide WSR Rules (MR 6105.0010 — 6105.0250) and the rules specific to the Mississippi River (MR 6105.0800 — 6105.0960), and hereby approved, provided all of the conditions of approval in this letter are met. Ordinance Evaluation We have reviewed the following ordinance sections, received on July 16, 2019 that you propose to amend Chapter 3 Section 3.7 Subsection E. paragraph 9. Building height. Next Steps Following are the steps for completing and receiving final DNR approval for your ordinance amendment: 1. The city council adopts the amendment 2. Email the completed Ordinance Processing Checklist (attached) and the documents identified on the checklist within 10 days of city council adoption to: a. James Bedell Area Hydrologist (iames.bedell@state.mn.us) b. Ordinance.review.dnr@state.mn.us 3. We will review the amendment adopted by the city council for consistency with the rules. 4. If the adopted amendments are consistent with the rules, I will send you a"final approval" letter. State rules require DNR final approval of Wild & Scenic ordinances and amendments for those ordinances to be effective. Revised 10/12/2018 A Wild & Scenic ordinance is an important land use regulation that helps to protect surface water quality, near shore habitat, and shoreland aesthetics of Minnesota's wild and scenic rivers. We appreciate your efforts to protect these resources for all present and future Minnesotans. James Bedell is available to help the city administer the ordinance and to consult with you on other water-related projects and their implementation. Sincerely, j; _ ,:st�;='z-1 Tim Crocker Region 3 North District Manager Attachments: Proposed Ordinance with DNR comments Ordinance Processing Checklist James Bedell, DNR Area Hydrologist Ordinance.review.dnr@state.mn.us Revised 10/12/2018 Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019 2B. Public Hearin� — Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximatelv 875 sauare foot residential detached Accessorv Use Structure — Maior in an R-1 (Sin�le-Familv Residence) District. Applicant: Mick Herold Property: Planning Case Number: PID 155-061-002030 Legal: Lot 3, Block 2 Sandburg East Address: 9721 Gillard Avenue Northeast 2019-029 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Overlay Zoning: Current Site Use: Conditional Use Permit for a detached Accessory Use Structure — Major in an R-1 District September 21, 2019 Places to Live R-1 (Single Family Residential) The purpose of the "R-1" single family district is to provide for low density, single family, detached residential dwelling units and directly related complementary uses. � Single Family Residential Surrounding Land Uses: R-1 (Single Family Residential) in all directions. Project Description: The applicant is seeking to construct a detached accessory structure on the property. The proposed structure is proposed at approximately 875 square feet in area on the ground floor. The plans provided a gable roof design with trusses. As designed, there is no usable second story area, and the building appears to be approximately 14 feet 3 and 3/8 inches in height overall, or approximately 11 feet measured to the midpoint of the roof (as height is defined by the city code). The existing house foundation is a total of 1,500 square feet with an attached garage of 624 square feet. ANALYSIS Conditional Use Permit. Specific Zonin� Requirements. The zoning ordinance lists the following specific standards for these uses (with staff comments included): Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019 (2) Accessory Building - Major (a) In all residential districts except M-H, the following shall apply: (i) Size 1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: a. 1,200 square feet; or b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. The applicant has proposed an approximately 35' x 25' detached accessory building in the rear yarc� The total combined area of the attached garage and detached accessory building would be 1,499 square feet, or approximately 299 square feet in area above the mcrximum 1,200 square foot permitted accessory use - major building in the R-1. As such, a conditional use permit is requirec� The proposed structure is well under 10 percent of the rear yarc� The rear yard is estimated at over 29, 000 square feet, outside of required setbacks. 2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: (a) Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. The plans detail a building footprint of 875 square feet, with a gable roof design. As noted above, the peak of the roof would be approximately 14 feet 3 and 3/8 inches in overall height, with a side wall height of about 11 fee� As such, no second story would be possible, or factor into the square footage calculation. Th combined proposed 875 square foot structure and existing attached structure of 624 feet total 1,499 square feet, just under the allowable 1, 500 square foot thresholc� The applicant has indicated that the garage would be used for storage of bikes, lawn care equipment, a boat, a snowblower, an ATV and grills. Accessory buildings are restricted to uses that are accessory to the residential use of property - no business activity is to occur in such structures. That requirement should be included as a condition of approva� 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019 (b) The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. An aerial image estimation of the rear yard is over 29, 000 square feet. The structure will be located behind the rear building line of the principal structure. The proposed project would utilize less than 10 percent of the rear yard, leaving the balance as open space. The proposed detached structure is proposed to be located along the northwest interior side yard property lin� The included survey does not list the proposed setback, but the proposed location seems to be about 75 feet from the rear yard property line, and approximately 75 feet from the principal structure. Per the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, the setbacks for accessory structure on the interior and rear side are 6 feet setback and 6 feet between structures. The survey suggests the proposed side setback would be approximately 17 feet from the north property line. The applicant will be required to verify setbacks by locating and staking property corners and supplying a new certificate of survey for the proposed structure. (c) The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. The applicant has proposed a structure that is less than 10 percent of the rear yarc� The proposed plan, although it requires the Conditional tlse Permit review, appears to meet the requirement of the ordinance, given the large property on which it is to be locatec� (d) The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. The applicant has proposed to use horizontal siding and shingles that are expected to be similar to the house in appearance and color. The proposed building is consistent with these requirements. (ii) Private Garages 1. Private garages shall be used by the family or families residing upon the premises, except as follows: (a) One-half of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non- residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non- Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019 commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if sufficient off-street parking in full compliance with this ordinance is provided elsewhere on the property. (b) All of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if the available garage space does not exceed two spaces. 2. No business, service, or industry shall be carried on within a private garage; 3. Private garages shall not be used for the storage of more than one (1) commercial vehicle owned or operated by a resident per dwelling unit. The applicant has indicated in their narrative that the space would only be used for personal storag� Overlay Zoning Districts. The property is located approximately 800 feet from the shoreline of the Mississippi River. As this distance, the property is not within the 300 foot Shoreland Overlay District. The boundary line for the Mississippi River Wild and Scenic Recreational River Overlay District lies just north of the subject property according to the City's zoning map. As such, the parcel in question is subject only to the R-1 zoning regulations, and is not impacted by the Overlay zoning requirements. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Use Structure — Major in an R-1 District L Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2019-027 recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a proposed approximately 875 square foot structure, subj ect to the conditions in Exhibit Z, and based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. PC 2019-027, recommending denial of the Conditional Use Permit based on findings to be stated at the public hearing. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC 2019-027 subject to submission of additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the CUP, based on findings that the building meets the intent and the specific standards of the Zoning Ordinance. As noted, the applicant is well below the threshold for structures being less than 10 percent of the rear yard, and the proposed building plans clarify size, design, usage, and height, all consistent with ordinance requirements. � Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019 D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2019-027 B. AerialImage C. Applicant Narrative D. Building Elevations E. Setback Illustration F. Site Images G. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpt Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019 EXHIBIT Z Mick Herold Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building — Major 9721 Gillard Avenue Northeast 1. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. 2. The accessory building shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials including color. Access to the structure will remain on the property, with no rear yard driveway. 4. An updated certificate of survey illustrating the proposed structure and staking of property lines and setbacks will be required at building permit to verify setback requirements. 5. No overstory trees should be removed without City administrative approval. 6. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. � CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-027 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DETACHED RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY USE STRUCTURE — MAJOR IN AN R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT ADDRESS: 9721 GILLARD AVENUE NORTHEAST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 3 AND 4, BLOCK 2 SANDBURG EAST WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct a detached accessory use — maj or structure in the rear portion of the subj ect property for storage of private residential storage and lawn equipment; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Single-Family Residence (R-1) and, which allows such use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Places to Live" for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting the proposed structure and location of the structure on the subj ect property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 3rd, 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the accessory use structure - major is in compliance with maximum square footage requirements, which require a maximum square footage for attached and detached accessory structures of 1,500 square feet. 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the accessory use structure - major is architecturally similar to the principal structure in roofline and fa�ade appearance. 3. The parcel is an oversized lot which will accommodate the accessory building without crowding the subject property or neighboring parcels. 4. The building is proposed to be located in a wooded area that will buffer views of the building from neighboring property. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-027 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Use Structure — Maj or, subj ect to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: 1. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. 2. The accessory building shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials including color. Access to the structure will remain on the property, with no rear yard driveway. 4. An updated certificate of survey and staking of property lines and setbacks will be required at building permit to verify setback requirements. 5. No overstory trees should be removed without City administrative approval. 6. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 3rd day of September, 2019 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING CONINIISSION By: Sam Murdoff, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 � �,. { : S �i a.. � � . �, '� u -. .. N . �-:_,�r. �� � -:,� y ... w ... . a enr O �} ��:�� ; �•. �� p �� �,: �. �� �� � ". � �' :i�,�h _ � . .� �� . � �F .. . �= ���.r � . . -� :v' >. L �,� u�.., �� � ` �� . �'�GC^`+ � �' ' � s `k� 4J 4 t � - .r � . - % . - .. O e— , � � ��y °FY. ��y 4 � ; C7 �, � �, � z , fr�.��..,,'.. � > . , � � � � t � � � �.� � ..� � ,. . G7 ��,�\ �", � .. � U � � �. �� . �..� i .. {�r,•1. � ° �' � . n� '` i � �y `,' e., s�� t''} 4"'} � . v-,` � � . �" . rt _° � �� �:�'� � _ ���;� ; ._ � � r � ' :.� � �]' � " � _ . 2 , •�; � � ,��� �;� rv : d � :. � —� � ,;�' �""h � �- -� ��;� � ',�.� a`�i "` �- r. �' � �- � f�` �de+; f , ., �' . - �. ' �` r L .4 y y� ,-�i � '` . •_`. � ',�.� i ,7�. y�` ' � t. � �3f � � � U t � ��i ^� u; �.tik •, +� �,.�.�� �, , 'oa, ,�,� .. ;e�� � a �� � ca'�� G � �� -�„ . �'hg, . "� � '�p . ,. � -.� �� .�-� . P` �*.. 'y.+7e ^ �O '� ., � � � � # �1 ''�! �:M �1 � �i , � �: �µ f � '� . ...� � .._� ` ":-1� : � .. i :;_.� r ¢,.,,� �� " °� '� � � � � . � � � ' . p �S ,+a {''1 � ��`'-�. � �� ,� --u,+• _ � ...� y � _ • � .. ¢ -.�.�,',�-` �� " � �r�` .. N�;�, �i R _ ,, N , , �+ . Q ��� �,,,� �'. ,�r � ". � .;� � . � � . , , � , �� � � _ �' � k. �. � , ,: +�°r:. � � � _ -� � �y � �� �,� x.. .. r � � � I � � ,�,� N� �,� ,. � ,�, ea� � � c°7 'ti.. ��" .. :5 �A. � ,y � � �. � � y _= �, N. � R�—Y`.�� `-'7 � „u � `'� . - •'7 1G � N- � i e"- � � Z •�, � ; _ . � _ � '�. :'�a`� � ,,,: � � � y �' �., � e�x �° ,. � �'� `� „�� � � e 3 x . ' � i � ,�_ � �fir��� �� x �'� � '- °'�'•� `� r7� � - : . � J �. _ ,�\Y . y _ � ;- , h�� �' ' � � � .+�" � �� �e, y�, �cJ � �^ . � ��� �y �,� �,, 'R• �1�5�'; f . .. . � +M.:� , ' • . 'ti.' �„ . . . � . � ' �'��� � W ` -. Z w � �nr �na a�d��i� c� �M _ � .P ._ , ��,�.- ,.�.a � ry . �� �" �:, �- ++�NN� F:-;�r�'�: . a� A � _ Q � �arr.��� � � p� ���y�' �� , r�'�' _ ''"�; � �E ��'°�` � �,. � �,... .1 K r � ` � '" `� -� �� �' , � ,� p � ' � '�� a9� � � �� �"'� ;� � "" y�' t�^ • �i� , � � �r � # � ! � �� ,�.��` � (n' ti ! • C�t M,, � C+ 1 �_ �'�' `- � ..r 4±F' �r � �.� , -'`�1 �� w k��- 'w:? �" !� � � � Y� ' .Y ��-^ � �'� � . ,�'r-« - ,./ ��. � t� � . � ' i ''–� .�- � '�e- � p: �=. �. o, «�, � �e. . ¢; .� p',�; �#� �ry� t�" � : � '� L_� � �' v"��� °�x: "� a� �K �, � �Af y�;� �--� � �, � �s � �, � ' � ;. F °y �. ��-, � �,,. � � � •�' +� � � � ! � ."-. Y � ��. �'���� S #�*`[ �"'' �_r✓ "& 1 K � �. � 3 S $f a' . � � �� �1 � 4 �� ..> �� { r - � � :F� Si � '" � ��"� �` .� � ., ..-s— v q � e � r''•�` € � �=' � ,�� v � ���'� /'� �' \ { 2. '�t� L.L � 'a� 1 � ' �4 .::YI A ��l T�� � - �x L.L � 'W .' # � � Nit .a, �4 '� ` �. � �w F .�� ' �a' .� � . - �i � �. � r M � % mw � ?�^ � � �`". I s ' � � � � r�ri�' ,E'�. ;� ` �� � p x" aY wx.u, '� � � �, 3` ` �s � '.�""r'` � �' �.� ' • � -� , ••� � � � x ��, �.. .��i�y�: ,�y� N O `� S � �5r � � �' �� .r1 . � � ]i V s � RT� C� ._.vBi . � O ;; ". � � � �". �F��: . �' 4'�� ^ '�+—� , � � ��s �� � : � �: �r. �� � � �:�, � 0 1 i� ----- ' �� • � '� •� �F � ��= � , _ O � ,,. "'' - , � � ,� � # � __,� � � �� � �f, ��' ��. �,�-"�- =�:�, � . � �. � �, � Q R„ � ; � * � 'J�,,,, �,. ,� : �`'. � �' �, � 5 � � , � � ��, ! �- _ i �� 0 � � � �` � �� � [:��� �—� .��' f y , U — �ti �.* ds � �� � ��,.� ► ti, � ` ��` � � � , � +� .�.. ,� �': . � � a ; � - �' �"'. * . 1.�� �; �,r� `� � � - . � ��'� � �� 3- >,.. . . W t . ; , O � _-_ � : � `�w,,� � �° '' ^ � ��:' � �� � F � ���� � ' a �"� �Q " �". ,�y �. d' , , � � � � � �'4�' � { '�` .� .., ` y . � 44.- "''�'.'' . -� }-� ,, �+1''`� � � � (n N y� '. r ', � �, yF.., .. � E ;ls .x � � � '��'' ' '� �, , � � �+'� �� � — _ � � � � _ '� � � .` � V k ' `F` '���` � a,; � , �E y. � .. � ����� `a^d.. a � . d° �� '� � � � N � 'i' � � `�, � a,t'y � � � — r� � �� � • � N ;�� �.�, , �� r ��' � b�`' �- '� �.. ,��'" -. �� n� '� *� ' � ,�� x� �f l �.*;' � U � ��;;. " i �' .' �..� � � e- � O p !� �',... � u� 0 { � .. . .. � � � �: �'� W � � t "� ,��. � ,� ���: �. � F , N � �n � � �.y,� a'� ' q � � �' � � �_ � � /y z _ � _ „r, .y` a � }` dfi� � ii ' � �!1 �F R � ��jT � i� N ca � �:, � '� �, �, �.. + � � z � "'�i r� r � � , � Ci ., :., : , . . . _ �'"�t ': d , � - U � �� ����� � �*� �. �* `� � � �� .s � � � ���1z +, � � �. � �>�: �i 3 .� �O �.�^ � �-- � -i ,h �" �—'� 'c , b [Y "�r�� r C � ; � � r � i �,. � , J � -F ''x Proposed work- Storage building in rear of property 25'x35' and 15' tall to peak. Building to match exterior color of existing home. Current Home has a standard 2 Car garage. This new Storage building will be used to store, bikes, Lawnmower,Snowblower,ATV, Boat,grills, etc. This will allow us to be able to actually park both vehicles in our garage. e� rr..�o� oN CONTRACT012: ' s ��' � � F���'.7 l'umbe'r �o<�K D t FIOMEOWNE�:MICKFIAROLD D[SCLIIM4 WLIABILIT5WH.1TSOE\2kFCRW}YQkROR40FAVV"KI�DTHtTMA}gE FOLND N VYI'L1NS V1PL�NSFURNISHEDBI'FOLEILL�IRER:1RElA1THOUT D� lt �entel' � OI L`� �I.Y l\_4RRaIJ1YRLLIAVCLOLSIILSLPL�SaRLilILSOLLRLSPO�S1➢ILIIYOLSIIL Offce:1�2019G4-G291 I a��. (}��i� 9hH-99�� �� e � rr..�o� oN CONTRACT012: �� s �r.�n - �.� ��nni . .,r >nau �+���.[7 �,umb�ii� �oi�K o�nv > � FIOMEOWNER� MICK FIAROLD DISCLIIMS VVLI.IBILITS WH:ITSOE\EkFCR \N}�EkRORS(JFAVV"KI�'DTH. TM:\}�yE N �� - Y tti FOLND N VYf'LANS V1PL�NSFURNISHP�BYPOLESLL�IRER.AREUITHOUT D� lt �entel' OI L`� �1 l\_4RRaIJ1YRLLIAVCLOLSIILSLPL�SaRLilILSOLLRLSPO�S1➢ILIIYOLSIIL Offce:1�2019G4-G291 I a��. (}��i� 9hH-99�� I. 25�_��� I, i o° N A � a rn n D �� � c� C1 � O � z rn � � z � rn � ;n — m N � X X � 0 � � � � D � Z m Cl � _ � O y � � rn O ➢ � z a � �n rn D y� ie�� 0 0 o ,' m ti O y O ;i � i� �� e ` rr_.o� oN CONTRACTOfZ: i' s v�. � � r� n�r< F���.y l'umbe'i� � FIOMEOWNER� MICK FIAROLD DISCLIIMS VYLI. BILITS WH1T5)E\EkFCR_ N} EkRORS(JF VV"KI�'DTH.�TM:\}�yE r 1\ �� - Y tti FOLND N VYf'LANS V1PL�N�SFURNISHP.�BIPOLESLL�IRER.AREUITHOUT D� lt �entel' W OI L`� rl l\_4RRaIJ1YRLLI CLOLSIILSLPL�SaRLilILSOLLRLSPO�S1➢ILIIYOLSIIL Hll UVFR(�T lTl1RnV1l� R(1FTHFSF�I>NC Offce:l�2019G4G_91 -.(}��9hY99�� -,.--.- - -._._____.__. � . �� � '�. � 1 \ a — —/VP• O Z — � tiw_....•_ _:: � .-. — - --• � ` .. � � �6U:•O�Z: ` � ' . °r ' o % k � w x v. m S � G ��tfl.eD �. f�u,Eir�v�_ �. — --� _ � � _ --�- --------__ _.. _.. _ � �.v.�����. � SURVEY MAP " 34 •4 . - . +� _` - � ..� . 't �5 � �' � , ,. .i��.. �. � • 11,�... -; � � , .. ,� � . ,� ' . � �%., • � 'J � � � ,� �,.' � � ,q, • % � � � � r � � , �"" . �►! � .y �3�° . \ L� � � � , ��„I` `�, r `� '`.%�� � . . , � - L � 3t�i*�►� , d*~' '�`�� . :�,' . ° ' xg , �, , . ^�t t� �� s►`�'�:'q'' �. � �,.,� '1 . �4v; � ,a � .• r � � ���� • �("j.. � , �' +t `�' 1• �,` M �K �� ..�y�' � i�� '+:•}�, ,' . k .' .. . . i .:\ 4 ��'-. F �f�,r"'�' .� ' . . f y � �'; ��� _ �^`.� ��y:. � �. L`{ i�� �1� � � . ��~ � t X �� -� C' . . � ` I �`�. . ( F�. .. �, �� �.. .:t .. ���� . lal: ' �� �Lr. . d� �i 1 �'� �� � �r .: "`"'�; ` . . . .�� � µ ' . . •. i #s � ,;'F� ; � � � r,�,y �;� � . `° a -� - ^� r +` ����� � � .� • ���„`�,� � �� f � � e`' '�` ,�� y . � '����s ' t� s �'� ,`j�� . ,7' � 1 _ d � • 3 �+• # a tk � , ���/y•a [ � I�` 4 S � � 1 � �r�`�., ��r:r�?�� �A . R • i V°��J�� i�� 1 A �_'iq• .: Y.�` "�'. - :� , ,z�-,;.. ; ;: a >4, � ' _ '.� .� J�` - _ �- F , � J . ±` ' y •� `� z . �;4 i` ���_',�,. y� : ,� '"'9. \ �" '. r �� y` � � � �: ��}y�1 � kn, �� '� �, � l 'a � � s � �' �� " .l �� y�L7 } "fiT �-�•__ . . - �—"LS, � ' '� ^ )f f � q • � t� . � A_+�i,y A: w y.�`„ � � r+�114'. . �S � 9 > ' ,M 4 l - - Y L -'� � � . .-� il, i � S" 1 � � �: '.`i �} �`.1� �ld��r�.�� . �� !-� .?�.-. -\ p �.: �,a2,. �.-�.�' `i,`y� "i` W � .,'r:r i • .� ` 'Ir i � . y� � ` �� ,� �4 r � � �d S ;' s _ ��� � � � ..:' � ,. . � � . �'' I yy 51 � � � E.�. � ,Al_ � `'� _ 5 . _ . .� �'L ` ..n . . � � �� ���� ` � � � ' .:iy I„c.'.3 �y .c�¢��x � 7 , � � ,: `� . �.. z� `� � •. � � i ,� ��•� , M��_!¢�,�Mp•�' �+ 4 � ' _'i,� r ., . 1a , r •�; . t�^' . a �X,, •� .�i',.. .'. • . ,`" • '� ' ,M1. + a � �'��.�.,M �J:,`1'►.•. . "- � "y' : .` �, �,�'r,. "'"' 4( . 4'i ��� � �� �~��',L., " tiy�� '� . •� r•� ��1 Zi .-�� ��t __ ��+w �'���, . r�:� R !� =�`���,�( ;, ` "�� 4 - � , ':� }�i. . YF „ � � i �-�I � 'kY� + X .� � � r p-y,�, � � .; 4 M ��Jq� f � �. . S �y ) �{ �d � f ' � • � .. '.t� _ i �7'�4Y�f1Y, .. _ �/� .', :.�_ �, _. k , � � ,� -�'j � �� ��t, �t J� ',,' ;��� f�` �,��,�,. ;* '� � r'- y � ��'�L �'�:�. �-,.�_� �:�',`�,,�e`. - . �� "-'�'-��,.,!y s���., t1: .� ��_ ..,w, �'� '�0= � •a�° ��; - r[ F...�� � T� ` � t;,�. , �. a., f ,'�T�'.�'�4�'� - � ,� •i�;r� .�; �` �;. , . r • ��i� %";�jC �: s� yt.�► >`' �' s (�. ., `� � E _ , `. �: �. Ey��'''� x,�' :'�a�,, : -t � x. � '� > "�'� d r r � e 4 �;� , ( fr ' Y '�ix -�r� '� ��'�►'r � , . r • �s%� , �'� s�- ` i�' ' +r � �::: s �*�• ��' ti<.- • ,;�5.. . � �� � i , • � � , � ' a , a ��� � . � �� , �{...;�. { ��,�j'x" a' � ' . . '` 'll �/ y � ' � ,y7{ . �� � T'�• V2 � '�� f'r l' Y'*� -� � jP �,�- !`.. i �� ��� ���' y,l �� `� �• � �Y �+ � � � � 9 �� ` i �'a' �r` • '�r /! � '. � ' `�,�," y; ',�' T '� '�%'� �'�, j � ��'� t � � � ,: , �1��_ .�* ' , ' w ��� �' �t'� I � �. �. � �►;��� • �'� i {. ,�� �. ` _ 'vy►• .°'- ,�.����,„ , . ' .,.� t`��� `, � �^�., , { �-t r� � �,�,,i �;�; ����� pf .:,�� -� ` ��i � I' � fi � �` �`' �r,�b +, � � �,�� �`1 a ' �, P " ,3 �,e ..��l;, � + tii'!�`; �� •�'l` 1►:. � � � � ' ^. : � �t�,. �,. .�,� � s;. .7� ;: '•�� . �i.� , � ��� , i-,. . �'' ..�,i , '�+ `" �.`i �f t� } \ ` .' `}� '• - }� �� .s�� � a-,� _ F,... . . � � r kR � 4 y al. ' . - .. ., . �y � P T - e ��►.� , ��� � . 3 �� � j�1 � �' � _ `t. }�� ` � �_ r :i ��,�� � �� �� ..� � � � ��. N� �`� , ,� , . � `�y `�, ' ' � .+��, 1 1 _ 1 \ +� � I `�i,� _ ,� . `�... .r'1,.. 1�?�1i41���,.1�: . ■ Y - ��L ��'t�;�,� ' � ,�`�C _ ' f^ ... ^ b. '� ti ��� � 5 •_��- iM. �tk ..w�� �` f i i F a'�,5+;.. . . �i� v xx ; � j� � � Sx+ � � � i.!' � :,�"'M` 'c+. i� I N : ."i`1{��¢� _ S� l f � `.: � -'.�+.,� � :: � '9s 4 �-.�s —�. �_ , ,,,,,,_ w`._:• �' � � . . y I � "1 '�t .# ' �'(( N .� '� t "- � aif�l�a ��Y }��/�% . � -� � �� � �.,� : ;;11 '�T2#�R 'rewt ',�Y^i� �� , • , � t . � � � 1 ..� { �F' .' �'�.- - k' R i. t t�i�1 ' ... "`�1��' '�'�"�1` X � �:'�k'y . t � � ; j�' y_ �✓ ,< Y , � � ,- .�' �����.. �� � , . . � � � `?� � �!� �•� � > ' T �. . �':� h .y�� ' �4^...� �i�. ,��, '• y t� (J ..��, �; _ . �: � 3 . . •_,�:. _ ;ti i.; ' ��. , � b ... .: r ' : �+ � �y` s ? � �t ��� .� � , . � L`. � y, ,� �, , � ,f - . ` � � ^ " :�.�;- � ' �� . '`� r `� � '�:�� .�' . .. . �;. � � � • « �' - a '�_ ' ��� ��.�+� '��i�'a17�q��. _ � , -. �`� ..��� ��� 7'f h j." '� ?� � �: � a��t ti(�vk� r a:' �' , � f II � � �. a ` � ",� '>, g � y ��;��t''.� �'+�' �,� �r 'i� '.t�. - -.., �r � 'i /('; ' �-•. � ��'•. � , •� �.f � ; � x �' n � ��F . . �Z � �'� I �- � . �,�.• h .�,,,a.� � - . �'�� ` ✓' ° r, I "d � ,'�ti/, r . .. � � �,� ,r 1 ^��� _,« � � � '� � ��` . �. i �. . . _ � , '} . {" � t �� �� �' � P 'F�Y : i r i' a.< t F� t' .� ,t +^ ` t � - � � � �R.. f � � � t .. i �t�� � � � ��J�':.�''r��1'�r�� �ro ,-}��, ��� ��'t-� .r" 1 4 ('�'s. . � y '�42. '( r !y � ,4�. 4 y ^�� ' � 7 • � y � . , .+ . MPk�� M .. . � r � �'d i. �� 1 � � � �r%a+� � 7e!',.�N��i ,k�` :��� r� �;�,�",�,i�\'��'f� �r �.3 4 •�'f 'f� �" , •.�r' !�'�. � ��_ . ��1�5'Y�. �'+ �'.L vl:�. � �. ,+! � �r �{. � , _ . tia �' '� Yp . . ��•t' f��' f� :�.. ! �, �tt, t t 1 �;.� �,�i . s � r ,��. � M �. ' ` 1 = ��'S s J•; F r yf � a� ,, yF� v� .s�"� 1� .J i �' .,�" �� '�;� � �P � r� � ��'� �� �' � f '+%6` , q R � � � : f 1 i�l �e /�i�� .�'#1f . � x, ''��� �1� }, > r ♦ : � 0 ,� .y , �+ S� r. � � , j , ,�,�sd � �. � .�,���� s!!"' - � L �' :� � � `�• 1.� � • � ,• a-�Y!' �/. �� � � �•:. �.,�iq �r���`S4Fi�� ��:�+ ���`1`^.r� !� �'S '� '�i ,r, � _ � •; L � - - ' '..: + y �!Za.. � �n,'� � �i� . � • ��t/ y ^.-�w �. �P a� ,� '��,�r �Y .s .r,+� -�s�' '- F:�� � �l f f !3� f "� �. 1""�.-i� •7 Y��A�� . � •a�, 1�: A � r�:��"�+S > '+ ^ �..A. �'}Y�Y �.r �lr� `„ z..t►r � . . ���%r,'�'�';��'�' �` 't�� - � . � • r �. > �.. ,, �.�.. . � � ,� 4 . � � }y R J, , ti .. Y_ R.�_"j �• Nij : ..� l`yN � `-/, " .�'4-i.'�X ; . � � - ��� —... ' P �': r ,ers-J�r,= - �yl*. 4 �_ � • F��,, • c( � `1 � �' . �� � ��.R.�� \ � �{ '� 1 � -� - s ;_ � ;�.:.t� -� x 3 _ -. _ t. L _ _ e-. .. / � e� , . . . .� . ' . �..'. s�. :. Cf-l�il�i`E� S: i�5� Si��f��t�L35 Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards �;,.sbsection (B) General Standards and Limitations for Accessory Uses and Structures (b) Be customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to the principal use and structure; (c) Be subordinate in area, e�ent, and purpose to the principal use or structure; (d) Be owned or operated by the same person as the principal use or structure; (e) Be located on the same lot as the principal use or structure, subj ect to the Public Improvement Project Exception as regulated by Section 62 (D)(1); (f) Not be constructed or established prior to the time the principal use or structure is constructed or established, subject to the Public Improvement Project Exception as regulated by Section 62 (D)(1); (g) Together with the principal use or structure, not violate any standards of this Ordinance; (h) Not be located within platted or recorded easements or over underground public utilities; (i) An accessory building sha11 be considered an integral part ofthe principal building if it is connected to the principal building either directly or by an enclosed passageway. Such accessory buildings shall adhere to requirements for the principal building. (j) If a principal building is proposed to be removed with no immediate replacement, all accessory structures shall also be removed. (k) Not constitute a combination use, which is the combination of two principal uses (combination uses will not meet the above standards in terms of being subordinate or providing service to the principal use). (3) Location of Accessory Uses or Structures Except for fences and walls, the following standards shall apply to all accessory structures: (a) All accessory structures, except as may be specifically denoted, shall be located at least six (6) feet from all lot lines, and at least the minimum distance from public rights-of-way as denoted in the individual zoning district regulations. All such structures must meet applicable building codes related to fire separation distance. �i�y �t �vior��eeiio �aning t�r�trr��r�4 �:;� r3�g� s,r�s � ���P�`�� S: 115� S°T.��i3�i�I7S Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table o f Permitted Accessory Uses (i) A side yard setback of twenty (20) feet shall be maintained from property lines abutting public streets. (b) Detached accessory buildings shall be six (6) feet or more from any other building or structure on the same lot. (c) Detached accessory structures shall not be located beyond the front building line established by the principal structure, with the exception of commercial canopies and signs, which must adhere to regulations of this ordinance. (4) Maximum Height (a) Detached accessory buildings shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height except in the I-1 and I-2 districts. (b) No accessory structure shall exceed the height of the principal structure unless specifically allowed by this ordinance. (5) Maximum Number of Accessory Structures In all residential zoning districts, the following limitations on accessory structures shall apply: (a) No more than one (1) private, detached major accessory building may be erected for each dwelling; (b) No more than one (1) private, detached minor accessory building may be erected for each dwelling; (c) Additional major or minor accessory buildings may be erected if approved via a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 2.4(D). (6) Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings Opt Out The City of Monticello opts-out of the requirements of Minnesota Statute §462.3593, which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings. (C) Table of Permitted Accessorv Uses (1) Listed Accessory Uses Table 5-4, lists the allowed types of accessory uses and structures within each zoning district. If a specific accessory use is allowed in a district, the column underneath the district is marked with a"P." If a specific accessory use is Section 2.4LD): Conditional Use Permits r'��� ���: �;�f�� �� �Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table o f Permitted Accessory Uses (3) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures • • • � .- . � -. �.. . . . . -. -. • . -. minorsory Building — P P P P P p p p p p P P P P P P 5.3 D I ( 1( 1 majorsory Building — P P P P p p p C p P P P P P P P 5.3(D1(21 Adult Use — accessory C 5.3(Dl(31 Agricultural Buildings p 5,3(D1(41 Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) P P P P P P P P 5.3(Dl(51 Automobile Repair — Major C 5.3(Dl(61 Automobile Repair — Minor C C 5.3(Dl(7l Boarder(s) p p p 5.3(Dl(81 Bulk Fuel Sales/Storage p p p C C C 5.3(D1(91 Cocktail Room (Retail Sales Accessory to Micro- C C C C C C Distillery) 5.3(�( I 0� Co-located Wireless Telecommunications C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Antennae 4.13(El Columbarium (Accessory P P P P P P P use to Cemeteries) 5.3(�( I I� Commercial Canopies P P P P P P P P 5.3(�(�2� Commercial Transmission/ Reception Antennae/ C C C C C C Structures 4. I�D�. Donation Drop-off Containers P P 5.3(�(13� Drive-Through Services P P P C P P P 5.3(D�(14� EntertainmentlRecreation C C C C 5.3(�(15� — Outdoor Commercial Fences or Walls p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p 4.3 Greenhouse/Conservatory P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p 5.3(D�(16� (non-commercial) Heliports C C C C C 5.3(D�(17� Home Occupations p p p p p p p p p P 5.3(D�(18� Indoor Food / p p p p p p p p 5.3(�(19� Convenience Sales IY"ei�� ade,� t' :,,;y� f�j ii�itiT3U�:EiiiS C�iitit� �Jit`JitFt7tF%f' eF7APTER S: USE STA�lDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Speci fic Standards for Certain Accessory Us�,�, (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessorv Uses (1) Accessory Building — Minor (a) Minor accessory buildings do not require a building permit, but shall comply with all applicable zoning regulations. (b) In the M-H district, one minor accessory building for storage of equipment and refuse is permitted for each manufactured home provided the accessory building can meet all required setbacks, and is designed of weather resistant material that will enhance the general appearance of the lot. (2) Accessory Building — Major (a) In all residential districts except M-H, the following shall apply: (i) Size 1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed i���� ��� �;�Ft� �t iYie;nticeif� �onrr�g �raincrnte Cl���'i`�� �: i15� Si��fi��t�C35 Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards S�absection (D) Additional Speci fic Standards for Certain Accessory Uses ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: a. 1,200 square feet; or b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. 2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a ma�mum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: a. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. b. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. c. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. d. The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. (ii) Private Garages 1. Private garages shall be used by the family or families residing upon the premises, except as follows: a. One-half of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if sufficient off-street parking in full compliance with this ordinance is provided elsewhere on the property. b. All of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if the available garage space does not exceed two spaces. 2. No business, service, or industry shall be carried on within a private garage; 3. Private garages shall not be used for the storage of more than one (1) commercial vehicle owned or operated by a resident per dwelling unit. (b) In the M-H district, the following shall apply: �i�y o� �Von�eeiio �aning �r�trr��r�4.� 6s�ge �f�s'i` Planning Commission Agenda - 09/03/19 3A. Consideration to appoint Chairman Sam Murdoff to the Monticello 2040 Communitv Vision & Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisorv Committee (AS) The Planning Commission is being asked to formally appoint a member to serve on the Monticello 2040 Community Vision + Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). As noted at the August meeting Chairman Sam Murdoff has been asked to serve as the official representative, pending Commission appointment. The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will provide guidance on matters related to current planning context, public facilities, infrastructure, and public services. The TAC will meet approximately once per month during the two-year planning effort. Other bodies proposed for representation on the sub-committee include the City Council, Planning Commission, EDA and Parks & Recreation Commission. There will also be a Community Advisory Committee formed to gain broad-based feedback and ideas for the planning effort. The CAC will be responsible for communicating plan concepts to their representative groups and boards, encouraging and promoting event and community meeting attendance. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to nominate Commissioner Sam Murdoff as the Planning Commission representative to Monticello 2040 Community Vision + Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisory Committee. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff defers to the PC on matters of appointment. D. SUPPORTING DATA: TAGCAC Prospectus • ontice � - VlS14N + �PLAN - The Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan process will build on the commitment and enthusiasm that community members have for Monticello. The process will involve events and activities designed to spark dialogue and generate ideas and consensus on how Monticello will grow and develop over the next 20 years. ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUMMARY Advisory Committee Roles and Responsibilities The Technical and Community Advisory Committee are proposed to guide the creation and development of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan Update. The Committees will meet on a continual basis during the planning process to help craft the long-term vision for Monticello, define Comprehensive Plan objectives, review public input, and shape specific elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The Committees' primary role is to provide a means for which the community's concerns can be conveyed to the planning consulting team as the Comprehensive Plan evolves, and to provide critical review of the planning direction at certain points and milestones during the planning process. The Advisory Committees will also provide the framework within which community feedback will be transmitted between key project participants and stakeholder groups, particularly with the City of Monticello acting as the point of contact between the Advisory Committees and the planning consulting team. The planning consulting team includes the Lakota Groups of Chicago, Illinois and WSB of Minneapolis. Advisory Committee Composition Each of the two committees should ideally be comprised of representatives from different stakeholders and stakeholder groups. The first group, the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), will provide guidance on matters related to current planning context, public facilities, infrastructure, and public services. The TAC will be responsible for in-depth review of the plan documents as they develop and act as liaisons back to their representative boards regarding the plan. The Community Advisory Committee (CAC) will provide structured guidance and feedback and serve as the "Plan Champions." The CAC will be responsible for communicating plan concepts to their representative groups and boards, encouraging and promoting event and community meeting attendance. Importantly, the CAC will provide feedback on the big-picture concepts that will shape the vision and comprehensive plan. Potential committee membership and make-up is provided below, with other representatives to be included as appropriate. Technical Advisory Committee ❑ City Council (2) ❑ Planning Commission (1) ❑ Economic Development Authority (1) ❑ Parks and Recreation Commission (1) ❑ Monticello Independent School District Administration (1) Community Advisory Committee ❑ Members from TAC ❑ Monticello Residents (3) (including one each from Monticello School District Monticello Township and Shelburne Township areas) ❑ Wright County Commissioner (1) ❑ Industrial & Economic Development Committee (1) ❑ Township Board Representative (1) ❑ SHIP/Health Care Representative (1) ❑ Business Community Representative/ Chamber of Commerce Board Member (1) ❑ Youth Representative (1) Other Groups/Organizations to Consider for Representative Participation ❑ City of Monticello — including representatives such as the Mayor and staff from key departments ❑ Central Mississippi Regional Planning Partnership (formerly Highway 25 Coalition) ❑ Library Board ❑ Independent Educational Providers/Resources ❑ CentraCare – Monticello and other Community Health/Wellness Institutions ❑ State Health Institutional Provider/Representative ❑ Monticello Arts Initiative ❑ Civic Organizations ❑ Local Corporations and Significant Employers ❑ Wright and Sherburne County Representatives ❑ Churches and Religious Institutions ❑ Non-Profits, Advocates, Foundations, and other Community Organizations ❑ Financiallnstitutions ❑ Local Developers, Brokers, or Investors Page 2 Advisory Committee Tasks Members of the Advisory Committees are asked to commit to the following tasks. Please keep in mind that the Vision and Comprehensive Plan process will be flexible and the following meeting and event schedule may be adapted as need arises. Phase 1 – Community Visioning ❑ Joint Technical & Community Advisory Committee Kick-Off (Meeting #1, Team Visit #1) — a two (2) hour meeting scheduled for Friday, September 6t" from 4:30- 6:30 PM at the Monticello Community Center. ❑ TAC/CAC/City Council & Planning Commission Community Bus Tour – Scheduled for Friday, September 6t" from 6:30-8:30 PM. Meet at the Community Center ❑ Community Kick-Off Celebration (Meeting #2, Team Visit #1) – informal meeting to help launch the project, create awareness, and introduce the Comprehensive Plan process to the community. Scheduled for Saturday, September 7t" from 3– 7 PM at West Bridge Park. Kick-Off Celebration attendance is optional but recommended for Advisory Committee members. ❑ Community Workshop 1(Meeting #4, Team Visit #2) – a two (2) hour interactive workshop scheduled for early/mid-October (tentative) with community stakeholders to review the planning process and gather feedback to help inform future vision and development scenarios. Workshop attendance is optional but recommended for Advisory Committee members. ❑ Joint Advisory Committee Meetings (Meeting #3, Team Visit #2) —meetings scheduled for early/mid-October (tentative) to review issues raised at the Community Workshop, provide direction and discuss progress to date. ❑ Technical Advisory Committee Review of Draft Vision Report (November 2019) — a review of initial Vision Report findings in advance of the following Joint Advisory Committee Meeting. While the Advisory Committee will provide comments on deliverables throughout the planning process, all deliverables will remain in draft form throughout the course of the project and will not be revised without first receiving consent from the City. Two (2) to four (4) hours may be required to review the Draft Plan and associated materials. ❑ Advisory Committee Meeting (Meeting #5, Team Visit #3) —meetings scheduled at a date and time to be decided to formally present draft vision and development recommendations and acquire feedback. ❑ Community Workshop 2(Meeting #6, Team Visit #3) – a two (2) hour interactive workshop scheduled at a date and time to be decided with community stakeholders to review and gather feedback on draft vision and development scenario recommendations. ❑ Technical Advisory Committee Review of Second Draft Vision Report (Winter 2019/2020) — a final review of the revised Vision Report findings in advance of the following Public Review period and Municipal Work Session ahead of Vision Plan adoption. Page 3 Phase 2– 2040 Comprehensive Plan ❑ Advisory Committee Meetings (Meeting #7, Team Visit #6) —meetings scheduled for Spring 2020 (tentative) to review Draft Comp Plan planning strategies and associated concepts. ❑ Community Workshop #1 (Meeting #8, Team Visit #6) – a two (2) hour interactive workshop with community stakeholders to review Draft Comprehensive Plan strategies with the community at large. This Open House will also include topic and issue stations for participants to circulate around and to provide input on specific Comprehensive Plan elements as desired. A main emphasis of this community meeting is to educate the community on comprehensive planning goals and opportunities and to validate their adherence with the "Vision for Monticello." Tentatively scheduled for Spring 2020. ❑ Advisory Committee Review of Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Late Spring 2020) — a review of the Draft Comp Plan Report in advance of the following Joint Advisory Committee Meeting. Two (2) to four (4) hours may be required to review the Draft Plan and associated materials. ❑ Advisory Committee Meeting (Meeting #9, Team Visit #7) — a two (2) hour meeting scheduled for Summer 2020 (tentative) to review Draft Comp Plan planning strategies and associated concepts, and brainstorm and provide feedback on Plan implementation strategies. ❑ Community Open House/Interactive Forum (Meeting #10, Team Visit #7) – a two (2) hour interactive open house to review the draft Comp Plan with the community and help to educate residents on the comprehensive plan goals, strategies, and proposed Monticello Vision. Tentatively scheduled for Summer 2020. ❑ Final Advisory Committee Review of Proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Summer 2020) — a final review of the revised Comprehensive Plan report in advance of formal Municipal review and adoption. Time Commitment In all, Advisory Committee members will be expected to attend and review: ❑ Approximately ten (10) meetings and workshops, potentially totaling ten (10) to twenty (20) total hours if all workshops and open houses are attended in addition to standard meetings. ❑ Four (4) drafts of plan documents totaling eight (8) to sixteen (16) total hours. Total time commitment for Advisory Committee participation over the course of the planning process, including workshop attendance, is approximately eighteen (18) to thirty-six (36) hours. To ensure efficient transmission of information and to avoid duplicative feedback, all Advisory Committee comments on the project deliverables should be provided directly to the City. City staff will then consolidate all comments and contact Advisory Committee members as needed to clarify issues or resolve any conflicts. One set of comments for each draft deliverable will then be presented to the Lakota Group and the planning team. Copies of this one set of comments, Page 4 will also be provided to both Advisory Committees, so everyone understands which comments were provided to Lakota. Page 5 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/03/19 3B. Communitv Development Director's Report Council Action on Commission Recommendations • Consideration to approve a request for Conditional tlse Permit for a detached Accessory tlse Structure - Major in an R-1 (Single-Family Residence) Distric� Applicant: Jerome Buboltz City Council approved the request on August 26th, 2019 on the consent agenda. • Consideration to approve a Preliminary and Final Plat and Development Contract for Savitski Commercial Applicant: DJ's Properties, LLC City Council approved the requests on August 26th, 2019 on the consent agenda. • Consideration to approve a request for Conditional tlse Permit for a 92 unit Multi family/Assisted Living Facility in the R-4 (1Vledium-High Density Residence) Distric� Applicant: Monticello Senior Housing Owner, LLC- Michael Hoagberg City Council approved the CUP on August 12th, 2019 in a 4-1 decision. Detached Accessory Structure Information �During the August Planning Commission meeting, it was requested that staff provide information on recent Detached Accessory Structure-Maj or information. Please find attached a map illustrating 2017-2018 CUP approvals and details. The recent Buboltz CUP request was the first for 2019. Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan Update Planning Commissioners should be aware of the following meetings and events related to the Visioning component of the Comp Plan project. Chair Sam Murdoff will be representing the Commission on the TAC. However, all Planning Commissioners are encouraged to attend the Friday bus tour and Music on the Mississippi event on Saturday. Friday, September 6th, 2019 • 7 AM - 9 AM: Joint Planning Commission/Council meeting at MCC • 4:30-6:30 PM: Joint TAGCAC meeting at Prairie Center • 6:30-8:30 PM: TAC/CAC/Commission/Council Bus Tour Saturday, September 7th, 2019 • 3 PM - 7 PM: Encore Music on the Mississippi and Community Vision Celebration at West Bridge Park Great River Regional Trail Please see attached flyer and invite. Planning Commission Agenda - 09/03/19 Planning Commission Training Please see attached for Government Training Services sessions. Please contact Jacob Thunander or myself if interested in attending any session. Please see the most recent City Council Connection and Highlights for other important news: https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/vertical/sites/%7B46185197-6086-4078-ADDC- OF3918715C4C%7D/uploads/Council Connection(1).pdf 2 O � 0 N G1 U U � G1 t U N N 0 a � V � � 0 N O .� � � O N U a � v t U N N 0 a � V n r-I 0 N T nq H i F �Lr'� `�r R � � +�,� f ��� �..�.,, �; ��� : �_" ������ �� � fM '�\ �'� ��",. � µ �' . � i6 ��y 'Klr `��� ��` "`'�j� '4 e p y�,�, I i* � ('_ �" +G,. �" . [T.^: j "' �a ��y.�'+La.i� 4 ' � PF ,�I�� � � � �v��, �y ��{' � . '�Fa �� y. � • � �� ��', .. �'p; �"#,�'� �. - 4 '�' ''�§. �,. �ix .tl`� 4 �, �'��..y,,, � y�' �+ ��:� .:�� � a ��,,�0. .y�$ � � �,y��.... �1"' 'l� ,��" . t . ,,y�. ��`r y !�- ,. �.' +e 1:4 ��, f �' ' .'� �IF � ^�� � �'� � ��` 4 !� � �: f� " ;�wr .t .� �. �1s: l� r� y��� ��� „f ..;� �i' �� � . �� 14�h•� _ �� '� .v �� ~' �:� ��� � `- i y �, � � � � �p"` ��• ��'�' �l;�' . ��I ..��. �.:�� ' ` �� � i � ' �- � ` � 1 - � � � �, �,� � � � • � '4 � „ � � - 1�.. �_ i � � r . ��ps 4k � � .�+' � � � � I I � � �• � � �,� � +'' � �� Lrc��'" '��~�` � �� �� . s�- . r! � �'�. i � - �--. �.� „��� -1� . . � - .. _ �"— � . . e � ` . � a .�ta ,� � � �. : A - w- f%' t .. .. ��� t ,f ' �lF.�,�,. °,�/� :a ' � ���� j � �� �� W• ,� ��i _ �� . �,+_ . �. `..� x ,� .� } � . � r ,.�� ,,_,� � i- �.��r "q�'�''.; N �� - » �� � � � � -- V� � } — `' r � r; � +' �r^�`� , � q � ' ��'•!� � { �` . •" �. i f � _ , � � - ,� � � � - � �; `•,.�1...,,�' � � r �:��+ �"- �, « �, � � � � +� r. , �-, -�� '� 'r� ; � �? ��' , i �i �k� �� '� � _ � �� J �' _ t - 1 ; � , .. = x, .� �-° �. > � +. ' , �� �_ .. r'.w ,' . � A ..... 1 � � " � ' •> � � j� I + .. : ' '►Ar.��'-: �. � � , � -,� � - ,. , ir� :r . . �`; - ��. -� r, ' � K - • � �. �.P r e, _ :r �• � � +� � „, ..a+''; r'� � ..1 . '� �.'. _. - y . .�. # `s r�'. � � �' .� C�:y ` 1��' I� . - '����+' ,�j '� � _ i,�� 7�:.4 + � t y ' ' Y, � - ` ,.1, I r r w " � . � � ''��p,:; � r v � � � w �--� � � !'� � "* ., � ,�,�� � r � �r 4' ..� ' . �6 k r'� � � , � ,_ � - ` � � � i�'��:�`+'. ., � � p� m r V N � if i � -, . _ .... . ,��. ,. __ '_ � � jij � . .� _ .. ^_...:'._'_. ' ,.. . . ...._._. . .� . � � �i ^ rw .�e�w: `�- :�,+� w..�.... ..i --�._. �,, � -' i' ; .'xt�` f: fJStJ ()��JfJ � ,.5, :.. r� +s^ -."9.�#► �.• . •!+►�i• � , , ir `�, F� ��. . , - r , � � `�i ��� 9 � � � � + _ _� � � l�*"CJ'� � � �.. �*`�, � �• �%�" _ �� t � � � , f � �� � ` � �' • ►''' �f'" � I'` � �"�' t.�"` ��, � } � � ' '�a= •,, � ' � Y'�` �:r � � _ . �� � . '`i�,�? � , ,.. _, :r i�!'. ��"'�' '� , _ _a /d r_ � 7'J 1 � Y � e � � �7r _ � % � � � � � � � � +; O �� L ^ {n Q ++ ^ � O � X M O � O � LL V i ++ � � Q .� � � � L L Vi � � L � O �O � � O O � c�6 a N 2 Q � -a � � � � U � � +�+ f0 X X � 41 W W � �' N N � � � � � �._�!n L O Q- � O � X � �O � O � � � Q c � ; co L L Vi � � L � O �O � � O � V U M � co Q � 2 Q � -a C C � � .� .� � L �n �n +� �p X X � � W W o � ��F,p►T RI VFR�P FG� 02 � � � � � • • � • • / • Wright County, in partnership with the cities of Clearwater, Monticello, and Otsego, is planning a regional trail along the Mississippi River.Attend the Open Houseto learn about the project and provide your input. �r �r � � �� z� �� Monncello health Jacob Thunander From: Land Use Planning <events@mngts.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 12:35 PM To: I n fo Subject: Jeff Back to Land Use school! Register now for September workshops i::�- _�..° =��-� uu u� �u � �: � i� � _ y �-� � — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — j �n a ena c�un ies. � i� To Learn More About these Courses, Click Below! This workshop is an abbreviated version of the Basics of Planning & Zoning, covering the essential information needed to understand planning, zoning and subdivision regulations. Participants will learn how planning and zoning tools can assist in development and redevelopment, as well as understand the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders involved in the planning process. Topics covered include: • Introduction to land use planning • Tools used for planning and zoning • Planning exercises • Procedures in the planning process. • Discussion and questions. - �_�_ _� � ._._� •. - _� _,� � � . e �F . This workshop provides of overview of public engagement and why it is critical to success of planners and policymakers. It overviews the different techniques, when to provide them, and tips for handling difficult situations. z ��:�.� �>a �n a.v. i. �n . . . . �i . �.:. :'a tib a,'a,b' a� s% . �. � �r' . wd `'o.r'a,� . sn �D pt' ad . . � �r" . e;� : 1w_C] � TI E RN EY Sourcewell : V Formerly NJPA � �� educationa/ events Engage. Inspire. Inform. GTS Educational Events � 1380 Energy Lane, Ste. 206, St. Paul, MN 55108 Unsubscribe infoCc�ci.monticello.mn.us Uqdate Profile � About Constant Contact Sent by events@mngts.org in collaboration with Constan� Cantact�, . � Try email marketing for free today!