Planning Commission Agenda 09-03-2019AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, September 3rd, 2019 - 6:15 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Commissioners: Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Paul Konsor, and Alison
Zimpfer
Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler
Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Jacob Thunander, Ron
Hackenmueller
1. General Business
A. Call to Order
B. Consideration of approving minutes
a. Regular Meeting Minutes — August 6th, 2019
C. Citizen Comments
D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
E. Consideration to approve agenda
2. Public Hearings
A. Continued Public Hearing — Consideration of an amendment to Monticello
Zoning Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 Overlay Zoning Districts, Subsection (E)
Wild and Scenic Recreational River District for height allowances. Applicant:
City of Monticello
B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for an
approximately 875 square foot residential detached Accessory Use Structure —
Major in an R-1 (Single-Family Residence) District. Applicant: Mick Herold
3. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration appoint Chairman Sam Murdoff to the Monticello 2040
Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisory Committee
B. Consideration of the Community Development Directors Report
4. Added Items
5. Adjournment
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, August 6th, 2019 - 6:00 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Commissioners Present: Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Paul Konsor, and Alison Zimpfer
Commissioners Absent: Sam Murdoff
Council Liaison Present
Staff Present:
1. General Business
A. Call to Order
Charlotte Gabler
Angela Schumann and Steve Grittman (NAC)
John Alstad called the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 6
p.m.
B. Consideration of Oath of Office
John Alstad read the Oath of Office to Paul Konsor. Konsor agreed to the terms.
C. Consideration of approvin� minutes
a. Re�ular Meetin� Minutes — Julv 2nd, 2019
MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR
MEETING MINUTES — JULY 2ND, 2019. PAUL KONSOR
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0.
b. Special Meetin� Minutes — Julv 15th, 2019 (D
MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL
MEETING MINUTES — 7ULY 15TH, 2019 (I). PAUL KONSOR
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0.
c. Special Meetin� Minutes — Julv 15th, 2019 (II)
MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL
MEETING MINUTES — 7ULY 15TH, 2019 (I�. PAUL KONSOR
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0.
D. Citizen Comments
None.
E. Consideration of addin� items to the a�enda
Angela Schumann recommended adding an item into the Director's Report for the
Comprehensive Plan.
F. Consideration to approve a�enda
MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. PAUL KONSOR
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0.
2. Public Hearings
A. Continued Public Hearin� - Consideration of a request for Conditional Use
Permit for a residential detached Accessorv Use Structure — Maior in an R-1
(Sin�le-Familv Residence) District
Applicant: Jerome Buboltz
Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 1 � 7
Steve Grittman explained the request for CUP for the construction of a garage at
1312 West River Street. The proposed accessory use structure met the code for
height, location and use. It was noted that the property does fall within the City's
Shoreland regulations. The applicant proposed a 36 by 26 foot garage, which
varied from the original submittal. Grittman explained the CUP criteria per the
Zoning Ordinance.
Staff recommended approval of the application subj ect to the conditions in
Exhibit Z.
Paul Konsor asked if the structure would have plumbing or electrical. Grittman
declined that the structure would have plumbing. Jerome Buboltz, the applicant,
indicated that electrical would be outside the doors. Buboltz indicated that the
garage would be used to store outdoor equipment. He also noted that he would be
residing his house and that the garage would match. Konsor asked if there would
be floor drains in the garage. Buboltz declined.
John Alstad asked if there would be any vehicle storage in the detached structure.
Buboltz declined.
Charlotte Gabler asked what the setback of the structure would be. Grittman
explained that it was shown at 20 feet of the east property line.
Alstad asked the applicant if he was familiar with Exhibit Z comments. Buboltz
agreed to the terms.
Marc Simpson asked if the existing shed would be torn down first. Buboltz
declined, but stated it would be removed once the new shed was constructed. He
did not want to store any of his outdoor equipment outside.
Candace Johnson, 1233 Sandy Lane, was concerned about the size of the
structure. She asked for clarification to the CUP requirements per the zoning
ordinance. Johnson was also concerned with a business running out of the
structure.
Buboltz explained that he would not run a business out of the property and that he
was hoping to retire soon.
Marc Simpson asked if a home business was something that the city could
enforce. Grittman confirmed, but noted that the City is on a complaint basis.
Staff commented on Ms. Johnson's concerns. They noted that the application fit
all of the criteria for CUP. Staff agreed that the size of the garage was large.
Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Decision 1. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Use Structure — Major in
an R-1 District
Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 2 � 7
MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PG2019-023
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
THE DETACHED ACCESSORY USE STRUCTURE - MAJOR, SUB7ECT TO
THE CONDITIONS 1N EXHIBIT Z, AND BASED ON FINDINGS 1N SAID
RESOLUTION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED, 3-0.
EXHIBIT Z
Jerome Buboltz
Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Use Structure — Major
1312 West River Street
1. The existing detached accessory building must be removed.
2. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal
property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to
be utilized for commercial purposes.
The accessory building shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in
architectural style and building materials including color, and including the addition of
brick to the front fa�ade of accessory structure similar to the of the home.
4. Access to the structure will remain on the property, with no rear yard driveway.
5. A revised certificate of survey and staking of property lines and setbacks will be required
at building permit to verify structure size consistent with the provided building plans,
setback requirements, including compliance with floodplain, Shoreland, and Mississippi
Wild Scenic and Recreational River District setback requirements.
6. No overstory trees should be removed without City administrative approval.
7. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission.
B. Public Hearin� - Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for
Parkin� Stall Desi�n & Preliminarv and Final Plat for Savitski Commercial
Applicant: DJ's Properties, LLC
Steve Grittman provided the staff report. He indicated that the subj ect property
was split up into five parcels and it was intended to replat to make one parcel.
Staff originally thought that the parking dimensions would require a Conditional
Use Permit, but it was noted that the development would be compliant with that
condition. Staff recommended paving and curbing all parking areas. It was noted
that the current parking encroaches in the railroad property. It was recommended
to remove the paving and restripe.
John Alstad asked what types of businesses were surrounding. Grittman noted that
there were banks, multitenant offices, multifamily, and single family homes.
Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 3 � 7
Paul Konsor asked for when the timelines of the conditions of approval would
have to be met. Staff would review at the time of building permits. The CUP's
have one year to construction from approval.
John Alstad opened the public hearing.
Donald Savitski, applicant, introduced himself. He noted that the proposed
addition would be 6,100 square feet.
Alstad asked why he was moving his business to Monticello. Savitiski noted that
his business has been in Monticello for some time, but he also has an Albertville
location. He would like to consolidate his business to one location.
Alstad asked if the applicant had reviewed the Exhibit Z comments. Savitiski
confirmed.
Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
MARK SINIPSON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2019-024,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SITE
PLAN REVIEW FOR 414 SOUTH PINE STREET, WITH THE CONDITIONS
IDENTIFIED 1N EXHIBIT Z. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED, 3-0.
EXHIBIT Z
Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review
414 Pine Street
Lot 1, Block 1, Savitski Commercial (proposed)
1. Relocate south existing parking area to a point off of the Sth Street right of way, and
restripe to 90 degree parking. Staff encourages the applicant to modify the parking to
meet setback if possible and add curb — these latter suggestions are advisory only.
2. Eliminate outdoor storage with the note that the applicant proposed to retain firewood
storage on the north side of the building within an existing fenced area. Firewood storage
is allowed in all zoning districts up to a maximum of ten cords.
3. Eliminate storage sheds.
4. Maintain interior trash handling.
5. Specify areas of possible showroom/retail floor meet:
a. Maximum storage area of 35% of building (some shared with retail is acceptable).
b. Maximum fabrication area of 40%
c. Applicant will prepare floor plan showing compliance.
Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 4 � 7
6. Staff encourages the applicant to consider the addition of up to 6 trees to meet total tree
planting requirements on site — this suggestion is advisory only.
7. Building materials to match/coordinate color of main building.
8. Lighting - Applicant will prepare a record of existing lighting and any new lighting
proposed, consistent with the requirements of the ordinance.
9. Signage — Applicant will prepare a record of existing signage on the property. Additional
signage to be reviewed separately if desired.
10. Outdoor sales and display to occur consistent with the allowances for sidewalk outdoor
display only. The applicant should define any proposed display on an updated site plan.
11. Compliance with City Engineer letter dated July 24th, 2019.
12. Compliance with MnDOT's comment letter of July 20th, 2019
13. Execution of required plat development and encroachment agreements, as applicable.
14. Other staff comments.
C. Public Hearin� - Consideration of an amendment to Monticello Zonin�
Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 Overlav Zonin� Districts, Subsection (E)
Wild and Scenic Recreational River District for hei�ht allowances.
Applicant: Citv of Monticello
Angela Schumann explained the staff report. She noted that the height allowance
in the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River District is 25 feet. City
Council asked the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing. The
recommendation was to allow 35 feet in both the MWSRRD and Shoreland
District. It was noted that in some areas the shoreland district extends 1,000 feet
past the shoreline. Schumann noted that the code was recodified in 2012, and was
adopted at 25 feet to ease in administration. The item came to light after
consideration for the Headwater's Development proposal for senior living. The 25
feet recommendation is consistent with the DNR standards.
Charlotte Gabler asked if this affects any previous variance approvals. Schumann
indicated that the variance stands, but is unnecessary if the amendment were
approved.
Paul Konsor asked why it was important to amend the ordinance. He also asked if
this was a way to avoid more variance requests. Schumann confirmed and noted
that the proposed ordinance amendment would be consistent with the DNR.
John Alstad opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing
was closed.
Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 5 � 7
Marc Simpson asked how many years the regulations had been in place.
Schumann noted that in the 1970's the creation of the MWSRRD and Shoreland
District were created. Monticello's code was amended in 2011.
Schumann noted that since the staff report was created, staff received preliminary
approval for the request from the DNR.
JOHN ALSTAD TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO TABLE
ACTION ON THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR HEIGHT
REQUIREMENTS 1N THE MISSISSIPPI WILD AND SCENIC
RECREATIONAL RIVER OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR CONSIDERATION AS
NOTED. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED,
3-0.
�,
3. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration of adoptin� Resolution PC-2019-025, a Resolution Findin�
that the Proposed Convevance of Certain Land bv the Citv of Monticello and
Citv of Monticello Economic Development Authoritv is Consistent with the
Citv of Monticello Comprehensive Plan
Angela Schumann provided the staff report. She explained that the conveyance of
property was to facilitate development of a light manufacturing facility. The
building would be 40,000 square feet and create 60 full time jobs. The site located
on Chelsea Road was identified by the company as suitable. The City would then
sell a parcel on Edmonson Avenue for residential development. Staff were
looking for a motion to approve a resolution finding the transfer of land consistent
to comprehensive plan.
Staff recommended approval and noted the increase in tax base and jobs in
support of the Comprehensive Plan.
JOHN ALSTAD MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PG2019-025, A
RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED CONVEYANCE OF
CERTAIN LAND BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND CITY OF MONTICELLO IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED,
3-0.
B. Consideration of the Communitv Development Directors Report
Angela Schumann provided the Community Development Director's Report. She
explained that the Lakota Group and WSB would be completing a visioning
session and comprehensive plan update.
She noted that the Planning Commission should mark their calendars for a
community celebration on Saturday, September 7th. This would be a kick off for
the visioning session.
Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 6 � 7
Schumann also explained a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and City
Council would occur on either September Sth or 6th. A bus tour would also be held
that same day. More information would be distributed when available.
It was noted that Sam Murdoff would serve on the Technical Advisory Committee
for the Planning Commission. John Alstad would be an alternative if needed.
Schumann indicated that the City Administrator provides community tours to new
members of the Planning Commission. If interested, members should contact staff
to set a time up.
Schumann explained that the City received an application for a digital billboard.
Staff understand that the request is a permitted use of an existing billboard and
can be replaced. The sign cannot be larger than existing. Discussion occurred
regarding having MnDOT approval and verification of illumination standards
being met.
4. Added Items
None.
5. Adjournment
�
MARC SINIPSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 74:29 P.M. PAUL
KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0.
Recorder:
Approved
Attest:
Jacob Thunander
September 3rd, 2019
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
Planning Commission Minutes — August 6th, 2019 Page 7 � 7
Planning Commission Agenda: 09/03/19
2A. Continued Public Hearin� - Consideration of an amendment to Monticello Zonin�
Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 Overlav Zoning Districts, Subsection (E) Wild and
Scenic Recreational River District for hei�ht allowances. (AS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Planning Commission opened and continued the public hearing on this item in August.
The Commission expressed general support for the amendment, but tabled action to allow
staff to provide the conditional approval letter received from the DNR.
During the June 24th, 2019 City Council meeting and the July 15th, 2019 Planning
Commission meeting it was explained that the current height limit within the city's
Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational Overlay District (MWSRR) ordinance is 25'
for principal structures.
When the MWSRR ordinance was adopted in 1978, the structure height was set at 35', in
accordance with MN Rules for the Wild and Scenic District.
The City recodified its zoning ordinance in 2009-2010. At that time, the Mississippi
Wild and Scenic Recreational River District and Shoreland Ordinance as previously
adopted by the City was incorporated by reference and left unamended. The previous
version of the ordinance adopted by reference included both the MWSRR and Shoreland
District regulations in one ordinance.
However, the MWSRR and Shoreland Districts are two separate sets of statutes and rules.
In 2011, the City began work with the DNR to update the Mississippi Wild and Scenic
Recreational River District and Shoreland ordinances to incorporate the two overlay
districts within the code and separate the regulations. Both the Shoreland and MWSRR
require review and certification by the DNR.
The current MN Rules for MWSRR sets a height allowance at 35' for structures, while
MN Rules for Shoreland height is currently 25' for residential structures. However, in
the 2011-2012 city recodification process for these two ordinances, the principal structure
height for both the MW SRR and Shoreland was set at 25', such that the height allowance
would be consistent between the two districts.
In summary, this 25' standard as noted in the city ordinance is consistent with MN Rules
for the Shoreland District, but 10' lower than the height that would be allowable under
the MWSRR. The consistent 25' standard does not address the variation in distance and
associated uneven impact on parcels within the MWSRR designation versus the
Shoreland District. An ordinance amendment setting height standard based on proximity
to the shore would address this condition.
It is important to note that the Shoreland Overlay District in Monticello includes all land
within 1,000 feet of the Ordinary High Water (OHW) of a lake and 300 feet from a river
or stream, or the landward extent of its designated floodplain, whichever is greater. The
MWSRR applies to a specific geographic area as determined by maps adopted into
Minnesota Rules and is, in the majority, inclusive of the Shoreland Overlay along the
Mississippi River. It appears that in areas outside of the core city as of 1978, the
MSWRR boundary was set by section or quarter section line. As such, portions of the
MWSRR extend as much as 2000' from the Shoreland Overlay boundary, and in some
locations, as little as 200 feet. By considering the amendment, there is an argument that
Planning Commission Agenda: 09/03/19
the ordinance would mitigate some of the inherent inequities that result from the
MWSRR boundary.
Based on this understanding the Council has asked that staff begin to work with the DNR
on an ordinance amendment and that the Planning Commission hold a hearing on an
amendment.
The amendment would require compliance with the 25' height requirement within the
Shoreland Overlay District, consistent with MN Rules for the Shoreland District, while
for areas outside of the Shoreland, but within the MWSRR, allow for heights up to 35'.
The City has received comment from the DNR on the proposed amendment. The DNR
has provided a letter of conditional approval for the proposed amendment. The letter is
attached for reference. Pending action by the Planning Commission and City Council,
staff will provide final ordinance language to the DNR. Certification of the DNR is
required for this ordinance amendment.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment for height
requirements in the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River Overlay
District as proposed, based on findings in resolution PC-2019-026.
2. Motion to recommend denial of the ordinance amendment for height requirements
in the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River Overlay District as
proposed, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission.
Motion to table for additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends approval of the ordinance. The ordinance amendment is
consistent with state rules for height in the MWSRR.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Resolution PC-2019-026
B. Draft Ordinance
C. Draft Ordinance Reference
D. Area Map - Proposed Amendment
E. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, MW SRR Height and Shoreland Height
F. Shoreland Height, MN Rules
G. Wild and Scenic Recreational Height, MN Rules
H. DNR Letter of Conditional Approval
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-026
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING
ORDINANCE REVISING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS IN
THE MISSISSIPPI WILD AND SCENIC RECREATIONAL RIVER (MWSRR)
OVERLAY DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the requirements and intent of the MWSRR regulations
statutes and rules; and
WHEREAS, the required limitations to height for buildings in the MWSRR accommodate
building heights of up to 35 feet; and
WHEREAS, the Shoreland Overlay District, which overlaps portions of the MSWRR
requires building limitations of no more than 25 feet; and
WHEREAS, the portions of the MWSRR which are not also part of the Shoreland Overlay
District are currently subj ect to a height requirement of 25 feet, whereas state rules would
permit the higher 35 foot standard; and
WHEREAS, buildings in the MWSRR which are not also part of the Shoreland Overlay
District are unduly burdened by the lower Shoreland height standards; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello's land use and economic development objectives, as
stated in the Comprehensive Plan and other policy documents, are difficult to achieve when
subj ect to the height limitations noted above; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance protects the Mississippi
River in accordance with both the MW SRR and Shoreland obj ectives; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 3rd, 2019 on the
application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to
present information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff
report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following
Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the intent and requirements of both
the State of Minnesota Shoreland Management Act and the MWSRR rules and
regulations as determined by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-026
2. The proposed amendment continues the City's policy of both protecting the
Mississippi River as a vital natural resource and as an economic development
asset.
3. The proposed amendment is consistent with the plans and policies as stated in the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
4. The proposed amendment will better regulate buildings in those areas where the
Shoreland Overlay District is not applicable.
5. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources had stated its approval of the
proposed amendment and the standards it sets, subj ect to formal DNR process
requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
Monticello City Council approve the amendment to the Mississippi Wild and Scenic
Recreational River Overlay District, establishing a 35 foot height requirement in those areas
of the District that are not impacted by the Shoreland Management regulations.
ADOPTED this 3rd day of September, 2019 by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING CONINIISSION
By:
Sam Murdoff, Chair
ATTEST:
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
2
CITY OF MONTICELLO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
WITHIN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DEFINING AND REGULATING EVENT
CENTERS, PLACES OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY, AND RELATED LAND USES
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 2.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS:
Section 3.7(E)(9) is hereby amended to read as follows:
(9) Building Height
The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the WSRR overlay
district:
(a) The maximum height of principal structures shall not exceed �35 feet e, xceUt
that the maximum hei�ht for principal structures shall not exceed 25 feet
when such structure is subiect to the requirements of the Shoreland Overlav
District, in which case the requirements of the Shoreland District shall
apply.
(b) The maximum height of accessory structures shall not exceed 25 feet.
The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance
as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to
renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended
effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary
corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process,
provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance
as has been adopted.
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage
and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website
after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at
Monticello City Hall for examination upon request.
ATTEST:
Jeff O'Neill, Administrator
AYES:
NAYS:
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
CHAPiER 3: Z�NiIVC; DISTR(CTS
Section 3J Overlay Zoning Districts
Subsection (E) Wild and Scenic Recreational River District
(e) Impervious surface requirements
(i) Impervious surfaces on lots within the WSRR overlay district shall adhere
to the following standards:
L Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the
lot area.
2. When constructed facilities are used for storm water management,
they must be designed and installed consistent with the field office
technical guide of the local soil and water conservation districts.
3. New constructed storm water outfalls to public waters must provide
for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface
debris before discharge.
(ii) The provisions of subdivision (i) above may be varied without a variance
if all of the following criteria and standards are met:
1. All structures and impervious surfaces are located on slopes less than
12 percent. The physical alteration of slopes shall not be permitted
for the purpose of overcoming this limitation.
2. The site development is designed, implemented, and maintained using
the most applicable combination of comprehensive practices that
prevent flooding, pollutant, erosion and sedimentation problems
consistent with Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas: Best
Management Practices for Minnesota, Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency, October 1989, or as amended, which is incorporated by
reference, available at the state law library and not subject to frequent
change.
3. A site development, maintenance, and inspection plan incorporating
the comprehensive practices of this section is submitted and approved
by the city prior to the issuance of an impervious surfacing permit and
the plan is implemented.
4. The city may impose additional conditions determined necessary to
protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
(9) Building Height
The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the WSRR overlay
district:
(a) The ma�mum height of principal structures shall not exceed 3�5 feet ���.e� ��
i�i�t �Fie r�taxirrium hei i�._�princi�ral siructures shail r�oi exceed 2� �ee�
�-ihen such structure is subject to the requirements of the Shoreland Overl��_
District, in which case the requirements of the Shoreland District shall a�lz .
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinan�� Page I 79
- ------- � i �`i I •I�,�'�;,� � N �
�
` ,� a �:zt � ;1^� ¢_ I � ; %"� � �
x
�+�' - �
��.
� �? � v
�`�! I -- "` � � � � �
a = I �' � oi o�
� P� "' `� ' �� �,r -- I'' . ' ' � � . 'c = = m
�'�.. _� � ! . Y . . ' '�. . t 1 �' � � � O LL �
� �a .. . �y,.. � � '.a�.r,w..�i ' � . - f � � � N C C � �/
�.`, ��I���4. y ' ' P� � N w '� 'O 'O M O
,� . ' �` � C � @ m m �
� : � - - f ;� 46`_`e , � �----�--, -� i"�! �� .-r �: 'o o a u
i �� ;� . .-
c ��`•� m � � o o �
'�s� _ � � i� �• ;,,�. a LL � �
hf�.� e�� �' F +ir-�.� �i �' o z in �n _
�� d t . f'�.�^ .. ` � •�� .� J V M � N M
' � � � � .. . i— . .
ff
r � � '�_ �F. �� , _ ks 1" ' t I� � O
� � ..u3' �- y�� �. — _ _ ._.A�..L _ � � I �
� � t ' — =.�_ '1�� i �_ �,i^ +�-�` i_— �
'�( � �; � � 'a� _'.�o � h r' 1.. - - _ � . : . z <
d_ e .: . •
-�°�.�"a,� �N 7 ,� . � � ,.. . ;; y .. - .!�' __. - .i�d, '1�,• , .
� '���4 �„'� � '� 1�� ,��;'�£; � 4, �ia� �• f ' �l'� L., --�i`
! � fi � '� � i_i I ���� • I
0.�a .� � .� . 1 ' ' . _ _ .
yA_..3°.i�+'�k�2� � Y�.Si�._�-�v4F�^.':. '.� � V�. �., � 7 i �. ����
�,n•p+v= '�%.J J" � •��� . .. - ��������
�+,. `�_ � �; �' � � (, -_
� �
,� �1.�, � �� � �
=� .
,�� � ' , ► ,��
�� 1 �� _,��. • _ _ !�
° �` .a�,;
� s �, � � - � . - � • i .
� �� � � � �� . __ , �.� �� ' '� � � � � : � i
� � — =�a�� � �, � � � � �� � h
£ �': `_ , � .
� � �
f��-.. �° --- - - �.r � .• �p I .•,r'
m - �- �i" 1' "_ .'- . ° � �i
r �� +y', I , � � � N� �" _ _ _ �i l_
.. � f . I F � •�� � �
� � � d : Y�. � � � � ""'1
.. - __ , ' , "ai, ,.: �, .� 1 _ . � _ �'�'�. . �.Z- .
_ i. �.� I - '� �..
/�� � � � ' ! . . • . ` �- - - - - •
�� -_ _ �°-_. . - n ��i y'r�''/ _ .^'�p� ' • a+ I, . �• ++
: �� - - � �l". � ✓ � A . �.-� _ JI C>
f.�` r� s � .� �., 'tiJ. � �. . /� N
� �-
� ���n� �j �� ,.. . - .a' r ^ ' a� .p.. Q
r � � �r ' S`.�°' ",�°t�°';^ i� . i � v
_ . € ,er i� 1� G � ' 'n,4,e� � � . _ � _ • - .
Y +n djt{�.:,f��i f 4_. .- . . � ti :� � .� Y
1 � .�^�: �� . ' �� ' � �Y�— G1 c
F�a" ,�t �'�l��.Ji�, � , � . 4•: " } I�� ' � � ' N �
� �
�' , �
�
.. �� • .f f �� ,_a . _ �: �z
«
.
. ,
.
� � � x:��� �, .. � � o�
. _._
„ ; � � � o
, _ 1' '�. , _,��
!C
� �
. � � �'.; : .� , i . � v u
. � �I - �' _ . - . m
0
. . i� ` � q'�. , I . �I �:��, . � � �
. . `r . , -. a - � b .�, r - �+ p
_ ' " I � �I � � � 1, �:.�. :��� I — �� � �
" \ • � � O
. ,� " . .__. �• i�.'�La�^' .... � O
�
. Il '!: . i - n.�Y 5.�� ♦ _ •� M
' . �` \.. -
� . 1�.{'{� 1� T
� , r _ �� � � � �I� `� �tT_�.��' i
r -.-� � � I�-' . �'. �� ., � �� I-• � y:.
.ri'
_ a�
.;
� ,
�
; , _
„ � -
� -�.
�. ��,� - �: �
,, '�j . ' ^� �-.f • � ,�,��. _-, ' � ' _ - ----'�: . C
r 4� �%." • ' "�`,•l+�. - �. � r. � ��. ,�.o..� 3
� ' � � �� i � ,., �� _ ��� m
�d 'A' ' 1
'"r'ti.:�� +,' / v. ✓ � :i. � `? -- ' � ' . • . r r .�ii. "R�
,I /,� � �'' ���,�• -/ R�M ... �'. � ',a �` ; yr `� ' Si� � �
� . ,: � }\� �i._ �!,
�_�� !ir iyl � - � ' �.
�� � ���I*•� _ � .� 1. , 4. � � ��_ .
� �: .� � _ �ti t� _' 'b,% .
/ � s t"� � � , � �� j 1 ^� �.
..�; � � , • • . �_ ,� � � ' .L
-/� �� ' � y .' � . �. v
- � � • r .,���: " � .�— � ��' � ., ui, ',� ~i�: . • �i� ' F -
� ` '•s «.� , ,�,�r. _ _1% . � �'- '- , ' �` � - f+�
� . �* �4- .. ' ' '�'•
.
.. �-.�� '�, y �'''k � ��t ib " '" �' �' � -.;.
rt �''��, „ . ,�' ,
r . _ °�' . •. t � �� e ,� �
,
t1►; ` �'� Y ,. ,. _ � ,.�' ,
�r ' ' � Yi� � � yu,.i • � • • . � r �=, �
_ ^ 1! � �.�
r ti�- N�. .� R_. `�: ♦! ' .'4 �l_ �� O
�ii ���^�'� . _ ':� . � w 1.' _„ � - ��• � � " s�s' � �
�1�. �l: � i ti , ��► ��•�,� ' •./' T',"'C • _ ��' _•�
"�`="l - �. . . - - . � � . -C; � - � . : r " .. - - o
��/ � �E ,;'�- y r. ' .,� • �,a �
� � y
. � �1'�, _;�_ , '' �,' � � �
�
CHAP1"ER 3: ZONtNG D1S7'RICTS
Sedion 3.7 Gverlay Zoning Disirict�
Subsectiori (E) Wild and Scenic Recreatiorial River Uistrict
(e) Impervious surface requirements
(i) Impervious surfaces on lots within the WSRR overlay district shall adhere
to the following standards:
1. Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the
lot area.
2. When constructed facilities are used for storm water management,
they must be designed and installed consistent with the field office
technical guide of the local soil and water conservation districts.
3. New constructed storm water outfalls to public waters must provide
for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface
debris before discharge.
(ii) The provisions of subdivision (i) above may be varied without a variance
if all of the following criteria and standards are met:
1. All structures and impervious surfaces are located on slopes less than
12 percent. The physical alteration of slopes shall not be pern�itted
for the purpose of overcoming this limitation.
2. The site development is designed, implemented, and nlaintained using
the most applicable combination of comprehensive practices that
prevent flooding, pollutant, erosion and sedimentation problems
consistent with Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas: Best
Management Practices for Minnesota, Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency, October 1989, or as amended, which is i�lcarporated by
reference, available at the state law library and not subject to frequent
change.
3. A site development, maintenance, and inspection plan incorporating
the comprehensive practices of this section is submitted and approved
by the city prior to the issuance of an impervious surfacing pernlit and
the plan is implemented.
4. The city may impose additiona] conditions determined necessary to
protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
(9) Building Height
The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the WSRR overlay
district:
(a) The inaximum height of principa] structures shall not exceed 25 feet.
(b) The maxinlum height of accessory structures shall »ot exceed 25 feet.
City of /�ontrcello 7_onir�g Grdincnce Pag� �%9
CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 3. 7 Overlay Zoning Districts
Subsection (F) Shoreland C)istrict
(c) Non-residential District Lot Standards
(i) Minimum lot standards for non-residential zoned properties shall be as
dictated by the requirements for the underlying zoning district
classification.
(ii) All structures and sepric systems within non-residential districts shall
comply with the structural setback standards for such features as listed in
Tables 3-24, 3-25 and 3-26.
(d) Bluff Impact Zones
Structures or facilities, except stairways and landings, must not be placed
within bluff impact zones.
(e) Height of Structures
(i) No structures, e�cept for churches and non-residential agricultural
structure�s, shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height.
(ii) Detached accessory structures shall not exceed fifteen (l5) feet in height.
(t) iJses Without Water-Oriented Needs
Uses without water-oriented needs are encouraged to locate on lots or parcels
without public water frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public
water frontage, must either be setback double the normal ordinary high water
level setback or be substantially screened fi-om view from the water by
vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions.
Gty of P�ionticello Zcning Ordinonce Page 201
2 REVISOR 6105.011 0
C. Placement of structures. Structures shall not be located on slopes greater than
13 percent unless such structures can be screened and sewage disposal system facilities can
be installed so as to comply with the sanitary provisions in part 6105.0120.
Where a floodplain ordinance exists, no structure shall be located in the floodway of a
stream as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 103F.111, subdivision 5, and furthermore
shall be placed at an elevation consistent with any such applicable floodplain management
ordinances. Where no floodplain ordinances exist, the elevation to which the lowest floor of
a structure, including a basement, shall be placed, shall be detennined after an evaluation of
available flood information and shall be consistent with the statewide standards and criteria
for management of floodplain areas of Minnesota.
D. Structure height shall not exceed 35 feet.
Statutory Authority: MS s 104.34; 103F.321
Published Electronically: June 11, 2008
Copyright G2008 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of'Minnesota. All Rights Reserved.
8 REVISOR 6120.3300
D. Steep slopes. Local government officials must evaluate possible soil
erosion impacts and development visibility from public waters before issuing a permit
for construction of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures, or other
improvements on steep slopes. When determined necessary, conditions must be attached
to issued permits to prevent erosion and to preserve existing vegetation screening of
structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters,
assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation.
E. Proximity to unplatted cemeteries and significant historic sites. No structure
may be placed nearer than 50 feet from the boundary of an unplatted cemetery protected
under Minnesota Statutes, section 307.08, unless necessary approval is obtained from the
Minnesota State Archaeologist's Office. No structure may be placed on a significant historic
site in a manner that affects the values of the site unless adequate information about the site
has been removed and documented in a public repository.
F. Proximity to roads and highways. No structure may be placed nearer than 50
feet from the right-of-way line of any federal, stat�e, or county highway; or 20 feet from the
right-of-way line of any town road, public street, or others not classified.
G. Height. All structures in residential districts in cities, except churches and
nonresidential agricultural structures, must not exceed 25 feet in height.
H. Accessory structures and facilities. All accessory structures and facilities,
except those that are water-oriented, must meet or exceed structure setback standards. If
allowed by local government controls, each residential lot may have one water-oriented
accessory structure or facility located closer to public waters than the structure setback if
all of the following standards are met:
(1) The structure or facility must not exceed ten feet in height, exclusive of
safety rails, and cannot occupy an area greater than 250 square feet. Detached decks must
not exceed eight feet above grade at any point.
(2) The setback of the structure or facility from the ordinary high water level
must be at least ten feet.
(3) The structure or facility must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed
from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks,
color, or other means acceptable to the local unit of government, assuming summer, leaf-on
conditions.
(4) The roof may be used as a deck with safety rails, but must not be enclosed
or used as a storage area.
(5) The structure or facility must not be designed or used for human
habitation and must not contain water supply or sewage treatment facilities.
Copyright OO 2015 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved.
�DEPARTMENT OF
NATU RAL R ESOU RCES
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Ecological and Water Resources
16543 Haven Rd.
Little Falls, MN 56345
August 2, 2019
Angela Schumann
Community Development Director
505 Walnut St.
Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Conditional Approval of City of Monticello's Wild & Scenic River Ordinance Amendment
Dear Ms. Schumann,
Thank you for sending your proposed Wild & Scenic River ordinance amendment to the DNR for
conditional approval review. I am pleased to inform you that the proposed amendment is substantially
compliant with the statewide WSR Rules (MR 6105.0010 — 6105.0250) and the rules specific to the
Mississippi River (MR 6105.0800 — 6105.0960), and hereby approved, provided all of the conditions of
approval in this letter are met.
Ordinance Evaluation
We have reviewed the following ordinance sections, received on July 16, 2019 that you propose to
amend Chapter 3 Section 3.7 Subsection E. paragraph 9. Building height.
Next Steps
Following are the steps for completing and receiving final DNR approval for your ordinance amendment:
1. The city council adopts the amendment
2. Email the completed Ordinance Processing Checklist (attached) and the documents identified on
the checklist within 10 days of city council adoption to:
a. James Bedell Area Hydrologist (iames.bedell@state.mn.us)
b. Ordinance.review.dnr@state.mn.us
3. We will review the amendment adopted by the city council for consistency with the rules.
4. If the adopted amendments are consistent with the rules, I will send you a"final approval"
letter. State rules require DNR final approval of Wild & Scenic ordinances and amendments for
those ordinances to be effective.
Revised 10/12/2018
A Wild & Scenic ordinance is an important land use regulation that helps to protect surface water
quality, near shore habitat, and shoreland aesthetics of Minnesota's wild and scenic rivers. We
appreciate your efforts to protect these resources for all present and future Minnesotans. James Bedell
is available to help the city administer the ordinance and to consult with you on other water-related
projects and their implementation.
Sincerely,
j; _ ,:st�;='z-1
Tim Crocker
Region 3 North District Manager
Attachments:
Proposed Ordinance with DNR comments
Ordinance Processing Checklist
James Bedell, DNR Area Hydrologist
Ordinance.review.dnr@state.mn.us
Revised 10/12/2018
Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019
2B. Public Hearin� — Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for an
approximatelv 875 sauare foot residential detached Accessorv Use Structure —
Maior in an R-1 (Sin�le-Familv Residence) District. Applicant: Mick Herold
Property:
Planning Case Number:
PID 155-061-002030
Legal: Lot 3, Block 2 Sandburg East
Address: 9721 Gillard Avenue Northeast
2019-029
A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND
Request(s):
Deadline for Decision:
Land Use Designation:
Zoning Designation:
Overlay Zoning:
Current Site Use:
Conditional Use Permit for a detached Accessory Use
Structure — Major in an R-1 District
September 21, 2019
Places to Live
R-1 (Single Family Residential)
The purpose of the "R-1" single family district is to
provide for low density, single family, detached
residential dwelling units and directly related
complementary uses.
�
Single Family Residential
Surrounding Land Uses: R-1 (Single Family Residential) in all directions.
Project Description:
The applicant is seeking to construct a detached accessory structure on the property.
The proposed structure is proposed at approximately 875 square feet in area on the
ground floor. The plans provided a gable roof design with trusses. As designed,
there is no usable second story area, and the building appears to be approximately 14
feet 3 and 3/8 inches in height overall, or approximately 11 feet measured to the
midpoint of the roof (as height is defined by the city code). The existing house
foundation is a total of 1,500 square feet with an attached garage of 624 square feet.
ANALYSIS
Conditional Use Permit. Specific Zonin� Requirements. The zoning ordinance lists
the following specific standards for these uses (with staff comments included):
Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019
(2) Accessory Building - Major
(a) In all residential districts except M-H, the following shall apply:
(i) Size
1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section
5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed ten
percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall
any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed
the following maximum area, whichever is less:
a. 1,200 square feet; or
b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint.
The applicant has proposed an approximately 35' x 25' detached accessory
building in the rear yarc� The total combined area of the attached garage
and detached accessory building would be 1,499 square feet, or
approximately 299 square feet in area above the mcrximum 1,200 square
foot permitted accessory use - major building in the R-1. As such, a
conditional use permit is requirec�
The proposed structure is well under 10 percent of the rear yarc� The rear
yard is estimated at over 29, 000 square feet, outside of required setbacks.
2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section
5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage
of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use permit when the
following conditions are found to exist:
(a) Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of
residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling and
no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes.
The plans detail a building footprint of 875 square feet, with a gable
roof design. As noted above, the peak of the roof would be
approximately 14 feet 3 and 3/8 inches in overall height, with a side wall
height of about 11 fee� As such, no second story would be possible, or
factor into the square footage calculation.
Th combined proposed 875 square foot structure and existing attached
structure of 624 feet total 1,499 square feet, just under the allowable
1, 500 square foot thresholc�
The applicant has indicated that the garage would be used for storage of
bikes, lawn care equipment, a boat, a snowblower, an ATV and grills.
Accessory buildings are restricted to uses that are accessory to the
residential use of property - no business activity is to occur in such
structures. That requirement should be included as a condition of
approva�
2
Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019
(b) The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient
size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot.
An aerial image estimation of the rear yard is over 29, 000 square feet.
The structure will be located behind the rear building line of the
principal structure. The proposed project would utilize less than 10
percent of the rear yard, leaving the balance as open space.
The proposed detached structure is proposed to be located along the
northwest interior side yard property lin� The included survey does not
list the proposed setback, but the proposed location seems to be about 75
feet from the rear yard property line, and approximately 75 feet from the
principal structure.
Per the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, the setbacks for accessory
structure on the interior and rear side are 6 feet setback and 6 feet
between structures. The survey suggests the proposed side setback
would be approximately 17 feet from the north property line.
The applicant will be required to verify setbacks by locating and staking
property corners and supplying a new certificate of survey for the
proposed structure.
(c) The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on
the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding
property.
The applicant has proposed a structure that is less than 10 percent of the
rear yarc� The proposed plan, although it requires the Conditional tlse
Permit review, appears to meet the requirement of the ordinance, given
the large property on which it is to be locatec�
(d) The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal
building in architectural style and building materials.
The applicant has proposed to use horizontal siding and shingles that
are expected to be similar to the house in appearance and color. The
proposed building is consistent with these requirements.
(ii) Private Garages
1. Private garages shall be used by the family or families residing upon the
premises, except as follows:
(a) One-half of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-
residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-
Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019
commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if sufficient off-street parking in
full compliance with this ordinance is provided elsewhere on the property.
(b) All of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents
of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles,
trailers, or equipment if the available garage space does not exceed two
spaces.
2. No business, service, or industry shall be carried on within a private garage;
3. Private garages shall not be used for the storage of more than one (1) commercial
vehicle owned or operated by a resident per dwelling unit.
The applicant has indicated in their narrative that the space would only be
used for personal storag�
Overlay Zoning Districts. The property is located approximately 800 feet from the
shoreline of the Mississippi River. As this distance, the property is not within the 300
foot Shoreland Overlay District. The boundary line for the Mississippi River Wild
and Scenic Recreational River Overlay District lies just north of the subject property
according to the City's zoning map.
As such, the parcel in question is subject only to the R-1 zoning regulations, and is
not impacted by the Overlay zoning requirements.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Decision 1. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Use Structure — Major in an
R-1 District
L Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2019-027 recommending approval of the
Conditional Use Permit for a proposed approximately 875 square foot structure,
subj ect to the conditions in Exhibit Z, and based on findings in said resolution.
2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. PC 2019-027, recommending denial
of the Conditional Use Permit based on findings to be stated at the public hearing.
3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC 2019-027 subject to submission of
additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the CUP, based on findings that the building meets the
intent and the specific standards of the Zoning Ordinance. As noted, the applicant is
well below the threshold for structures being less than 10 percent of the rear yard, and
the proposed building plans clarify size, design, usage, and height, all consistent with
ordinance requirements.
�
Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019
D. SUPPORTING DATA
A. Resolution PC-2019-027
B. AerialImage
C. Applicant Narrative
D. Building Elevations
E. Setback Illustration
F. Site Images
G. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpt
Planning Commission Agenda — 09/03/2019
EXHIBIT Z
Mick Herold
Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building — Major
9721 Gillard Avenue Northeast
1. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal
property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is
to be utilized for commercial purposes.
2. The accessory building shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in
architectural style and building materials including color.
Access to the structure will remain on the property, with no rear yard driveway.
4. An updated certificate of survey illustrating the proposed structure and staking of
property lines and setbacks will be required at building permit to verify setback
requirements.
5. No overstory trees should be removed without City administrative approval.
6. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission.
�
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-027
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
A DETACHED RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY USE STRUCTURE — MAJOR IN
AN R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT
ADDRESS: 9721 GILLARD AVENUE NORTHEAST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 3 AND 4, BLOCK 2 SANDBURG EAST
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct a detached accessory use —
maj or structure in the rear portion of the subj ect property for storage of private residential
storage and lawn equipment; and
WHEREAS, the site is zoned Single-Family Residence (R-1) and, which allows such use by
Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan designation of "Places to Live" for the area; and
WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting the proposed structure and
location of the structure on the subj ect property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 3rd, 2019 on the
application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to
present information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff
report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following
Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the accessory use structure -
major is in compliance with maximum square footage requirements, which
require a maximum square footage for attached and detached accessory structures
of 1,500 square feet.
2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the accessory use structure -
major is architecturally similar to the principal structure in roofline and fa�ade
appearance.
3. The parcel is an oversized lot which will accommodate the accessory building
without crowding the subject property or neighboring parcels.
4. The building is proposed to be located in a wooded area that will buffer views of
the building from neighboring property.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-027
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
Monticello City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Use Structure
— Maj or, subj ect to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below:
1. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal
property of the occupant of the principal dwelling and no accessory building space is
to be utilized for commercial purposes.
2. The accessory building shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in
architectural style and building materials including color.
Access to the structure will remain on the property, with no rear yard driveway.
4. An updated certificate of survey and staking of property lines and setbacks will be
required at building permit to verify setback requirements.
5. No overstory trees should be removed without City administrative approval.
6. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission.
ADOPTED this 3rd day of September, 2019 by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING CONINIISSION
By:
Sam Murdoff, Chair
ATTEST:
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
2
� �,. { : S �i a.. � � . �, '� u -. ..
N . �-:_,�r. �� � -:,� y ... w ... .
a enr
O �} ��:�� ; �•. �� p �� �,: �. �� �� � ". � �' :i�,�h _ � . .� �� . � �F
.. . �= ���.r � . . -� :v' >. L �,� u�.., ��
� ` �� . �'�GC^`+ � �' ' � s `k� 4J 4 t � - .r � . - % . - ..
O e— , � � ��y °FY. ��y 4 � ; C7 �, � �, � z , fr�.��..,,'.. �
> . ,
� � � � t � � � �.� � ..� � ,. . G7 ��,�\ �", � .. �
U � � �. �� . �..� i .. {�r,•1. � ° �' � . n� '`
i � �y `,' e., s�� t''} 4"'} � . v-,` � � . �" . rt _°
� �� �:�'� � _ ���;� ; ._ � � r � ' :.� � �]' � " � _
. 2 , •�; �
� ,��� �;� rv : d � :. � —� � ,;�' �""h � �- -� ��;� � ',�.�
a`�i "` �- r. �' � �- � f�` �de+; f , ., �' . - �. ' �` r
L .4 y y� ,-�i � '` . •_`. � ',�.� i ,7�. y�` ' � t. � �3f � � �
U t � ��i ^� u; �.tik •, +� �,.�.�� �, , 'oa, ,�,� .. ;e��
� a
�� � ca'�� G �
�� -�„ . �'hg, . "� � '�p . ,. � -.� �� .�-� .
P`
�*.. 'y.+7e ^ �O '� ., � � �
� # �1 ''�! �:M �1 � �i , � �: �µ f � '� . ...� �
.._� ` ":-1� : � ..
i
:;_.� r ¢,.,,� �� " °� '� � � � � . � � � ' . p �S
,+a {''1 � ��`'-�. � �� ,� --u,+• _ � ...� y � _ • � .. ¢
-.�.�,',�-` �� " � �r�` .. N�;�, �i R _ ,, N
,
, �+
. Q ��� �,,,� �'. ,�r � ". � .;� � . � � . , ,
� , �� �
� _
�' � k. �. � , ,: +�°r:. � � � _ -� � �y
� �� �,� x.. .. r � � � I � � ,�,� N� �,� ,. � ,�,
ea� � � c°7 'ti.. ��" .. :5 �A.
� ,y � � �. � � y _= �,
N. � R�—Y`.�� `-'7 � „u � `'� . - •'7 1G �
N- � i e"- � �
Z •�, � ; _ . � _ � '�. :'�a`� � ,,,: � � � y �' �.,
� e�x �° ,. � �'� `� „�� � � e 3 x
. ' � i � ,�_ � �fir���
�� x �'� � '- °'�'•� `� r7� � -
: . � J �. _ ,�\Y . y _ � ;-
, h�� �' ' � � � .+�" � �� �e, y�, �cJ � �^ . � ��� �y �,� �,, 'R• �1�5�';
f . .. . � +M.:� , ' • . 'ti.' �„ . .
. � . � ' �'��� �
W ` -.
Z w � �nr �na a�d��i�
c� �M _ � .P ._ , ��,�.- ,.�.a � ry . �� �" �:, �- ++�NN� F:-;�r�'�: .
a� A � _
Q � �arr.��� � � p� ���y�' �� , r�'�' _ ''"�; � �E ��'°�` � �,. � �,... .1
K
r � ` � '" `� -� �� �' , � ,� p
� ' � '�� a9� � � �� �"'� ;� � "" y�' t�^ • �i� , � � �r � # � !
� �� ,�.��` � (n' ti ! • C�t M,, � C+ 1 �_ �'�' `- � ..r 4±F' �r
� �.� , -'`�1 �� w k��- 'w:? �" !� � � � Y� ' .Y ��-^ � �'�
� . ,�'r-« - ,./ ��. � t� � . � ' i ''–� .�- � '�e-
� p: �=. �. o, «�, � �e. . ¢; .� p',�; �#� �ry� t�" � :
� '� L_� � �' v"��� °�x: "� a� �K �, � �Af y�;�
�--� � �, � �s � �, � ' � ;. F °y �. ��-,
� �,,. � � � •�' +�
� � � ! � ."-. Y � ��. �'���� S #�*`[ �"'' �_r✓ "& 1 K � �. � 3 S $f a' .
� � �� �1 � 4 �� ..> �� { r - � � :F� Si � '" � ��"� �` .�
� ., ..-s— v q � e � r''•�` € � �=' � ,�� v � ���'�
/'� �' \ { 2. '�t� L.L � 'a� 1 � ' �4 .::YI A ��l T�� � - �x
L.L � 'W .' # � � Nit .a, �4 '� ` �. � �w F .�� ' �a' .� � . - �i
� �. � r
M � % mw � ?�^ � � �`". I s ' � � � � r�ri�' ,E'�. ;�
` ��
� p x" aY wx.u, '� � � �, 3` ` �s � '.�""r'` � �' �.� ' • �
-� , ••� � � � x ��, �.. .��i�y�: ,�y�
N O `� S � �5r � � �' �� .r1 . � � ]i V s � RT� C� ._.vBi .
� O ;; ". � � � �". �F��: . �' 4'�� ^ '�+—� ,
� � ��s �� � : � �: �r. �� � � �:�,
� 0 1 i� ----- ' �� • � '� •� �F � ��= �
, _
O � ,,. "'' - , � � ,� � # � __,�
� � �� � �f, ��' ��. �,�-"�- =�:�, � . � �. �
�,
� Q R„ � ; � * � 'J�,,,, �,. ,� : �`'. � �' �, � 5 �
� , � � ��, ! �-
_ i ��
0 � � � �` � �� � [:��� �—� .��' f y ,
U — �ti �.* ds � ��
� ��,.� ► ti, � ` ��` � � � , �
+� .�.. ,� �': .
� � a ; � - �' �"'. * . 1.�� �; �,r� `� � � - . � ��'� � ��
3-
>,..
.
.
W t . ;
,
O � _-_ � : � `�w,,� � �° '' ^ � ��:' � �� � F � ���� � ' a
�"� �Q " �". ,�y �. d' , , � � � � � �'4�' � { '�` .� .., ` y . � 44.- "''�'.'' . -�
}-� ,, �+1''`� � � �
(n N y� '. r ', � �, yF.., .. � E ;ls .x
� � � '��'' ' '� �, , � � �+'� �� � — _ � � � � _ '�
� � .` � V k ' `F` '���` � a,; � , �E y. � ..
� �����
`a^d.. a � . d° �� '� � �
� N � 'i' � � `�, � a,t'y � � � — r� � �� � •
� N ;�� �.�, , �� r ��' � b�`' �- '� �.. ,��'" -. �� n� '� *�
' � ,�� x� �f l �.*;' �
U � ��;;. " i �' .' �..� � � e-
� O p !� �',... � u�
0 { � .. . ..
� � � �: �'� W � � t "� ,��. � ,� ���: �.
� F ,
N � �n � � �.y,� a'� ' q � � �' � � �_ �
�
/y z
_ � _ „r, .y` a � }` dfi� � ii ' � �!1 �F R � ��jT � i� N
ca � �:, � '� �, �, �.. + � � z �
"'�i r� r � � , � Ci ., :., : , . . . _ �'"�t ': d , � -
U � �� ����� � �*� �. �* `� � � �� .s � � � ���1z
+, � � �. � �>�: �i 3 .�
�O �.�^ � �-- � -i ,h �" �—'� 'c , b [Y "�r�� r C � ; � � r � i �,. � ,
J � -F ''x
Proposed work-
Storage building in rear of property 25'x35' and 15' tall to peak. Building to match exterior color of
existing home.
Current Home has a standard 2 Car garage. This new Storage building will be used to store, bikes,
Lawnmower,Snowblower,ATV, Boat,grills, etc. This will allow us to be able to actually park both
vehicles in our garage.
e� rr..�o� oN CONTRACT012: ' s ��' � � F���'.7 l'umbe'r
�o<�K
D t FIOMEOWNE�:MICKFIAROLD D[SCLIIM4 WLIABILIT5WH.1TSOE\2kFCRW}YQkROR40FAVV"KI�DTHtTMA}gE
FOLND N VYI'L1NS V1PL�NSFURNISHEDBI'FOLEILL�IRER:1RElA1THOUT D� lt �entel'
� OI L`� �I.Y l\_4RRaIJ1YRLLIAVCLOLSIILSLPL�SaRLilILSOLLRLSPO�S1➢ILIIYOLSIIL
Offce:1�2019G4-G291 I a��. (}��i� 9hH-99��
�� e � rr..�o� oN CONTRACT012: �� s �r.�n - �.� ��nni . .,r >nau �+���.[7 �,umb�ii�
�oi�K o�nv >
� FIOMEOWNER� MICK FIAROLD DISCLIIMS VVLI.IBILITS WH:ITSOE\EkFCR \N}�EkRORS(JFAVV"KI�'DTH. TM:\}�yE
N �� - Y tti FOLND N VYf'LANS V1PL�NSFURNISHP�BYPOLESLL�IRER.AREUITHOUT D� lt �entel'
OI L`� �1 l\_4RRaIJ1YRLLIAVCLOLSIILSLPL�SaRLilILSOLLRLSPO�S1➢ILIIYOLSIIL
Offce:1�2019G4-G291 I a��. (}��i� 9hH-99��
I. 25�_��� I,
i o°
N
A � a
rn n
D ��
� c�
C1 �
O �
z rn
� �
z �
rn �
;n
— m
N � X
X �
0 �
� � �
D �
Z m
Cl �
_ �
O y
� �
rn
O ➢
� z
a
�
�n
rn
D
y� ie��
0
0
o ,'
m ti
O y
O ;i
� i�
�� e ` rr_.o� oN CONTRACTOfZ: i' s v�. � � r� n�r< F���.y l'umbe'i�
� FIOMEOWNER� MICK FIAROLD DISCLIIMS VYLI. BILITS WH1T5)E\EkFCR_ N} EkRORS(JF VV"KI�'DTH.�TM:\}�yE
r 1\ �� - Y tti FOLND N VYf'LANS V1PL�N�SFURNISHP.�BIPOLESLL�IRER.AREUITHOUT D� lt �entel'
W OI L`� rl l\_4RRaIJ1YRLLI CLOLSIILSLPL�SaRLilILSOLLRLSPO�S1➢ILIIYOLSIIL
Hll UVFR(�T lTl1RnV1l� R(1FTHFSF�I>NC Offce:l�2019G4G_91 -.(}��9hY99��
-,.--.- - -._._____.__.
� .
�� �
'�.
�
1
\ a
— —/VP• O Z —
� tiw_....•_ _:: � .-. —
- --• � ` .. � � �6U:•O�Z: ` � '
. °r
' o %
k
� w x v.
m S
� G ��tfl.eD �. f�u,Eir�v�_ �. —
--� _ �
� _ --�- --------__ _.. _.. _
� �.v.�����.
�
SURVEY MAP
" 34
•4 . - . +� _` - � ..�
. 't �5 � �' � , ,. .i��.. �.
� • 11,�... -; � � , .. ,�
� . ,� ' . � �%., • � 'J �
� �
,� �,.' � � ,q, • % � � � � r � � , �"" .
�►! � .y �3�° . \ L� � � � , ��„I` `�, r `� '`.%�� � . . , � -
L � 3t�i*�►� , d*~' '�`�� . :�,' . °
' xg , �, , . ^�t t� �� s►`�'�:'q''
�. � �,.,� '1 . �4v; � ,a � .• r � � ���� • �("j..
� , �' +t `�' 1• �,` M
�K �� ..�y�' � i�� '+:•}�, ,' . k .' .. . . i .:\ 4 ��'-.
F �f�,r"'�' .� ' . .
f y � �'; ��� _ �^`.� ��y:.
� �. L`{ i�� �1� � � . ��~ � t X �� -� C'
. . � ` I �`�. . ( F�. .. �, �� �.. .:t .. ���� . lal: ' �� �Lr. .
d� �i 1 �'� �� � �r
.: "`"'�; ` . . . .�� � µ ' . . •. i #s � ,;'F� ; � � � r,�,y �;� � .
`° a -� - ^� r +` ����� � � .� • ���„`�,� � �� f � �
e`' '�` ,�� y . � '����s ' t� s �'� ,`j��
. ,7' � 1 _ d � • 3 �+• # a tk � , ���/y•a [ � I�`
4 S � � 1
� �r�`�., ��r:r�?�� �A . R • i V°��J�� i��
1 A �_'iq• .: Y.�`
"�'. - :� , ,z�-,;.. ; ;: a >4, �
' _ '.� .� J�` - _ �- F , � J .
±` ' y •� `� z . �;4 i` ���_',�,.
y� : ,� '"'9. \ �" '. r
�� y` � � � �: ��}y�1 � kn, �� '� �, � l 'a � � s �
�' �� " .l
�� y�L7 } "fiT �-�•__
. . - �—"LS, � ' '� ^ )f f
� q
• � t� . � A_+�i,y A: w y.�`„ � � r+�114'. .
�S � 9
> ' ,M 4 l - - Y L -'� � � . .-� il, i
� S" 1 � � �: '.`i �} �`.1� �ld��r�.�� . �� !-� .?�.-.
-\ p �.: �,a2,. �.-�.�' `i,`y� "i` W �
.,'r:r i • .� ` 'Ir i � . y� � ` �� ,�
�4 r � � �d S ;'
s _ ��� �
� � ..:' � ,. . � � . �'' I yy 51 � � �
E.�. � ,Al_ � `'� _ 5 . _ . .� �'L ` ..n . . �
� �� ����
` � � � '
.:iy I„c.'.3 �y .c�¢��x � 7 ,
� � ,: `� . �..
z� `� � •. � �
i ,� ��•� , M��_!¢�,�Mp•�'
�+ 4 � ' _'i,� r ., . 1a
, r •�; . t�^' . a �X,, •�
.�i',.. .'. • . ,`"
• '� '
,M1. + a
� �'��.�.,M �J:,`1'►.•.
. "- � "y'
: .` �, �,�'r,. "'"'
4( . 4'i
��� � �� �~��',L., "
tiy�� '� . •� r•�
��1
Zi .-�� ��t
__ ��+w �'���, .
r�:� R !� =�`���,�( ;, ` "��
4 - � , ':� }�i. .
YF „ �
� i �-�I � 'kY� + X .�
� � r p-y,�,
� � .; 4 M ��Jq� f � �.
. S �y ) �{ �d
� f ' � • � .. '.t� _ i �7'�4Y�f1Y, .. _ �/� .',
:.�_ �, _. k , � � ,�
-�'j � �� ��t, �t
J�
',,' ;��� f�` �,��,�,. ;* '� � r'-
y �
��'�L �'�:�. �-,.�_� �:�',`�,,�e`. - .
�� "-'�'-��,.,!y s���., t1: .� ��_ ..,w, �'�
'�0= � •a�° ��; - r[
F...�� � T� ` �
t;,�. , �. a., f
,'�T�'.�'�4�'� - � ,�
•i�;r� .�; �` �;. , .
r • ��i� %";�jC �: s� yt.�►
>`' �' s (�. ., `� � E _
,
`. �: �.
Ey��'''� x,�' :'�a�,, : -t � x. � '� >
"�'� d r r � e
4 �;� ,
( fr ' Y
'�ix -�r� '� ��'�►'r � , . r
• �s%� , �'� s�- ` i�' ' +r � �::: s �*�• ��' ti<.- • ,;�5..
. � �� � i , • � � ,
� ' a , a ��� � . � �� , �{...;�. { ��,�j'x" a' � ' . .
'` 'll �/ y � ' � ,y7{ . �� � T'�• V2 �
'�� f'r l' Y'*� -� � jP �,�- !`..
i
�� ��� ���' y,l �� `� �•
� �Y �+ � � � � 9 �� `
i �'a' �r`
• '�r /! � '. �
' `�,�," y; ',�' T '� '�%'�
�'�, j � ��'� t � � � ,:
, �1��_
.�*
' , ' w ��� �' �t'�
I � �.
�.
� �►;��� • �'� i
{. ,�� �.
` _ 'vy►• .°'- ,�.����,„ , . ' .,.� t`��� `,
� �^�., , { �-t
r� �
�,�,,i �;�; ����� pf .:,�� -� ` ��i � I' � fi � �`
�`' �r,�b +, � � �,�� �`1
a ' �, P
" ,3 �,e ..��l;, � + tii'!�`;
��
•�'l` 1►:. � � � � ' ^. : � �t�,.
�,. .�,� � s;. .7� ;: '•�� . �i.� , �
��� ,
i-,. . �'' ..�,i , '�+ `" �.`i
�f t� }
\ ` .' `}� '• - }� �� .s�� �
a-,� _ F,... . .
� � r kR
� 4 y al. ' . - .. ., .
�y � P T -
e ��►.�
, ��� � . 3 �� � j�1 � �' �
_ `t. }�� ` � �_ r :i
��,�� � �� �� ..� � � � ��.
N� �`� , ,� , . � `�y `�, ' ' � .+��, 1 1 _
1 \ +� � I `�i,�
_ ,� . `�... .r'1,.. 1�?�1i41���,.1�: . ■ Y
- ��L ��'t�;�,� ' �
,�`�C _ ' f^ ... ^ b. '� ti ��� �
5 •_��- iM. �tk ..w�� �` f i i F a'�,5+;..
. . �i� v xx ; � j� � �
Sx+ � � �
i.!' � :,�"'M` 'c+. i� I N : ."i`1{��¢� _ S� l
f � `.: � -'.�+.,� � :: �
'9s 4 �-.�s —�.
�_ , ,,,,,,_ w`._:• �' � � . . y I
� "1 '�t .# ' �'(( N .�
'� t "- � aif�l�a ��Y }��/�% .
� -� � �� � �.,� : ;;11 '�T2#�R 'rewt ',�Y^i�
�� , • , � t . � � � 1 ..� { �F' .' �'�.- - k' R i.
t t�i�1 ' ... "`�1��' '�'�"�1` X � �:'�k'y . t � � ; j�' y_
�✓ ,< Y , � � ,- .�' �����.. �� � , . . � � � `?�
� �!� �•� � > ' T �. .
�':� h .y�� ' �4^...� �i�. ,��, '• y t� (J ..��,
�; _ . �: � 3 . . •_,�:. _ ;ti i.; ' ��. , � b ... .:
r ' : �+ � �y` s ?
� �t ��� .� � , . � L`. � y, ,� �, ,
� ,f - .
` � � ^ " :�.�;- � ' �� . '`�
r
`� � '�:�� .�' . .. . �;. � � � • «
�' - a '�_ ' ��� ��.�+� '��i�'a17�q��. _ � ,
-. �`� ..��� ���
7'f h j." '� ?� � �: � a��t ti(�vk� r a:' �' ,
� f II � � �. a ` � ",� '>, g �
y ��;��t''.� �'+�' �,�
�r 'i� '.t�. - -.., �r � 'i /('; ' �-•. � ��'•. � , •� �.f
� ; � x �' n � ��F . . �Z �
�'� I �- � . �,�.• h .�,,,a.� � - .
�'�� ` ✓' ° r, I "d � ,'�ti/, r . .. � � �,�
,r 1 ^��� _,« � � � '� � ��` . �.
i �. . . _ � , '} .
{" � t �� �� �' � P 'F�Y : i r i'
a.< t F� t' .� ,t +^ ` t �
- � � � �R..
f � � � t .. i �t�� � � � ��J�':.�''r��1'�r�� �ro ,-}��, ��� ��'t-�
.r" 1 4 ('�'s. . � y '�42. '( r !y � ,4�. 4 y ^�� ' �
7 • � y � . , .+ . MPk�� M .. . � r � �'d i. �� 1 � �
� �r%a+� � 7e!',.�N��i ,k�` :��� r� �;�,�",�,i�\'��'f�
�r �.3 4 •�'f 'f� �" , •.�r' !�'�. � ��_ . ��1�5'Y�. �'+ �'.L vl:�. �
�. ,+! � �r �{. � , _ . tia �' '�
Yp . . ��•t' f��' f� :�.. ! �, �tt, t t 1 �;.� �,�i
. s � r ,��. � M �. ' ` 1 = ��'S s
J•; F r yf � a� ,, yF� v� .s�"� 1� .J
i �' .,�" �� '�;� � �P � r� � ��'� �� �' � f
'+%6` , q R � � � : f 1 i�l �e /�i�� .�'#1f . � x, ''��� �1�
}, > r ♦ : � 0 ,� .y , �+ S� r. � � , j , ,�,�sd � �.
� .�,���� s!!"' - � L �' :� � � `�• 1.� � • � ,•
a-�Y!' �/. �� � � �•:.
�.,�iq �r���`S4Fi�� ��:�+ ���`1`^.r� !� �'S '� '�i
,r, � _ � •; L � - - ' '..: + y �!Za.. � �n,'� � �i� .
� • ��t/ y ^.-�w �. �P a� ,� '��,�r �Y .s .r,+� -�s�' '- F:�� �
�l f f !3� f "� �.
1""�.-i� •7 Y��A�� . � •a�, 1�: A � r�:��"�+S > '+ ^ �..A.
�'}Y�Y �.r �lr� `„ z..t►r � . . ���%r,'�'�';��'�' �` 't�� - � .
� • r �. > �.. ,, �.�.. . � � ,� 4 .
� � }y R J, , ti .. Y_ R.�_"j �• Nij : ..�
l`yN � `-/, " .�'4-i.'�X
; . � � - ���
—...
' P �': r ,ers-J�r,= -
�yl*. 4 �_
� • F��,, • c( � `1 �
�' . �� � ��.R.�� \ � �{ '�
1
� -� - s ;_ � ;�.:.t� -� x
3 _ -. _ t. L
_ _ e-. .. / � e�
, . . . .� . ' . �..'.
s�. :.
Cf-l�il�i`E� S: i�5� Si��f��t�L35
Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards
�;,.sbsection (B) General Standards and Limitations for Accessory Uses and Structures
(b) Be customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to the
principal use and structure;
(c) Be subordinate in area, e�ent, and purpose to the principal use or structure;
(d) Be owned or operated by the same person as the principal use or structure;
(e) Be located on the same lot as the principal use or structure, subj ect to the
Public Improvement Project Exception as regulated by Section 62 (D)(1);
(f) Not be constructed or established prior to the time the principal use or
structure is constructed or established, subject to the Public Improvement
Project Exception as regulated by Section 62 (D)(1);
(g) Together with the principal use or structure, not violate any standards of this
Ordinance;
(h) Not be located within platted or recorded easements or over underground
public utilities;
(i) An accessory building sha11 be considered an integral part ofthe principal
building if it is connected to the principal building either directly or by an
enclosed passageway. Such accessory buildings shall adhere to requirements
for the principal building.
(j) If a principal building is proposed to be removed with no immediate
replacement, all accessory structures shall also be removed.
(k) Not constitute a combination use, which is the combination of two principal
uses (combination uses will not meet the above standards in terms of being
subordinate or providing service to the principal use).
(3) Location of Accessory Uses or Structures
Except for fences and walls, the following standards shall apply to all accessory
structures:
(a) All accessory structures, except as may be specifically denoted, shall be
located at least six (6) feet from all lot lines, and at least the minimum
distance from public rights-of-way as denoted in the individual zoning district
regulations. All such structures must meet applicable building codes related
to fire separation distance.
�i�y �t �vior��eeiio �aning t�r�trr��r�4 �:;� r3�g� s,r�s �
���P�`�� S: 115� S°T.��i3�i�I7S
Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards
Subsection (C) Table o f Permitted Accessory Uses
(i) A side yard setback of twenty (20) feet shall be maintained from property
lines abutting public streets.
(b) Detached accessory buildings shall be six (6) feet or more from any other
building or structure on the same lot.
(c) Detached accessory structures shall not be located beyond the front building
line established by the principal structure, with the exception of commercial
canopies and signs, which must adhere to regulations of this ordinance.
(4) Maximum Height
(a) Detached accessory buildings shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height
except in the I-1 and I-2 districts.
(b) No accessory structure shall exceed the height of the principal structure unless
specifically allowed by this ordinance.
(5) Maximum Number of Accessory Structures
In all residential zoning districts, the following limitations on accessory structures
shall apply:
(a) No more than one (1) private, detached major accessory building may be
erected for each dwelling;
(b) No more than one (1) private, detached minor accessory building may be
erected for each dwelling;
(c) Additional major or minor accessory buildings may be erected if approved via
a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 2.4(D).
(6) Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings Opt Out
The City of Monticello opts-out of the requirements of Minnesota Statute
§462.3593, which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care
Dwellings.
(C) Table of Permitted Accessorv Uses
(1) Listed Accessory Uses
Table 5-4, lists the allowed types of accessory uses and structures within each
zoning district. If a specific accessory use is allowed in a district, the column
underneath the district is marked with a"P." If a specific accessory use is
Section 2.4LD):
Conditional Use
Permits
r'��� ���: �;�f�� �� �Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards
Subsection (C) Table o f Permitted Accessory Uses
(3) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures
• • • �
.- . �
-. �.. .
. . . -.
-. •
.
-.
minorsory Building — P P P P P p p p p p P P P P P P 5.3 D I
( 1( 1
majorsory Building — P P P P p p p C p P P P P P P P 5.3(D1(21
Adult Use — accessory C 5.3(Dl(31
Agricultural Buildings p 5,3(D1(41
Automated Teller
Machines (ATMs) P P P P P P P P 5.3(Dl(51
Automobile Repair —
Major C 5.3(Dl(61
Automobile Repair —
Minor C C 5.3(Dl(7l
Boarder(s) p p p 5.3(Dl(81
Bulk Fuel Sales/Storage p p p C C C 5.3(D1(91
Cocktail Room (Retail
Sales Accessory to Micro- C C C C C C
Distillery) 5.3(�( I 0�
Co-located Wireless
Telecommunications C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
Antennae 4.13(El
Columbarium (Accessory P P P P P P P
use to Cemeteries) 5.3(�( I I�
Commercial Canopies P P P P P P P P 5.3(�(�2�
Commercial Transmission/
Reception Antennae/ C C C C C C
Structures 4. I�D�.
Donation Drop-off
Containers P P 5.3(�(13�
Drive-Through Services P P P C P P P 5.3(D�(14�
EntertainmentlRecreation C C C C 5.3(�(15�
— Outdoor Commercial
Fences or Walls p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p 4.3
Greenhouse/Conservatory P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p 5.3(D�(16�
(non-commercial)
Heliports C C C C C 5.3(D�(17�
Home Occupations p p p p p p p p p P 5.3(D�(18�
Indoor Food / p p p p p p p p 5.3(�(19�
Convenience Sales
IY"ei�� ade,� t' :,,;y� f�j ii�itiT3U�:EiiiS C�iitit� �Jit`JitFt7tF%f'
eF7APTER S: USE STA�lDARDS
Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards
Subsection (D) Additional Speci fic Standards for Certain Accessory Us�,�,
(D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessorv Uses
(1) Accessory Building — Minor
(a) Minor accessory buildings do not require a building permit, but shall comply
with all applicable zoning regulations.
(b) In the M-H district, one minor accessory building for storage of equipment
and refuse is permitted for each manufactured home provided the accessory
building can meet all required setbacks, and is designed of weather resistant
material that will enhance the general appearance of the lot.
(2) Accessory Building — Major
(a) In all residential districts except M-H, the following shall apply:
(i) Size
1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section
5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed
i���� ��� �;�Ft� �t iYie;nticeif� �onrr�g �raincrnte
Cl���'i`�� �: i15� Si��fi��t�C35
Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards
S�absection (D) Additional Speci fic Standards for Certain Accessory Uses
ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located,
nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory
building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less:
a. 1,200 square feet; or
b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint.
2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section
5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a ma�mum square
footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use
permit when the following conditions are found to exist:
a. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of
residential personal property of the occupant of the principal
dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for
commercial purposes.
b. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of
sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open
space on the lot.
c. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse
effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use
of the surrounding property.
d. The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the
principal building in architectural style and building materials.
(ii) Private Garages
1. Private garages shall be used by the family or families residing upon
the premises, except as follows:
a. One-half of the private garage spaces on the premises can be
rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger
vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if
sufficient off-street parking in full compliance with this ordinance
is provided elsewhere on the property.
b. All of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to
non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles
and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if the
available garage space does not exceed two spaces.
2. No business, service, or industry shall be carried on within a private
garage;
3. Private garages shall not be used for the storage of more than one (1)
commercial vehicle owned or operated by a resident per dwelling
unit.
(b) In the M-H district, the following shall apply:
�i�y o� �Von�eeiio �aning �r�trr��r�4.� 6s�ge �f�s'i`
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/03/19
3A. Consideration to appoint Chairman Sam Murdoff to the Monticello 2040
Communitv Vision & Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisorv Committee (AS)
The Planning Commission is being asked to formally appoint a member to serve on the
Monticello 2040 Community Vision + Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC). As noted at the August meeting Chairman Sam Murdoff has been
asked to serve as the official representative, pending Commission appointment.
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will provide guidance on matters related to
current planning context, public facilities, infrastructure, and public services. The TAC
will meet approximately once per month during the two-year planning effort.
Other bodies proposed for representation on the sub-committee include the City Council,
Planning Commission, EDA and Parks & Recreation Commission.
There will also be a Community Advisory Committee formed to gain broad-based
feedback and ideas for the planning effort. The CAC will be responsible for
communicating plan concepts to their representative groups and boards, encouraging and
promoting event and community meeting attendance.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to nominate Commissioner Sam Murdoff as the Planning Commission
representative to Monticello 2040 Community Vision + Comprehensive Plan
Technical Advisory Committee.
2. Motion of other.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff defers to the PC on matters of appointment.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
TAGCAC Prospectus
•
ontice �
- VlS14N + �PLAN -
The Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan process will build on the commitment and enthusiasm that
community members have for Monticello. The process will involve events and activities
designed to spark dialogue and generate ideas and consensus on how Monticello will grow and
develop over the next 20 years.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUMMARY
Advisory Committee Roles and Responsibilities
The Technical and Community Advisory Committee are proposed to guide the creation and
development of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan Update. The Committees will meet on a
continual basis during the planning process to help craft the long-term vision for Monticello,
define Comprehensive Plan objectives, review public input, and shape specific elements of the
Comprehensive Plan.
The Committees' primary role is to provide a means for which the community's concerns can be
conveyed to the planning consulting team as the Comprehensive Plan evolves, and to provide
critical review of the planning direction at certain points and milestones during the planning
process. The Advisory Committees will also provide the framework within which community
feedback will be transmitted between key project participants and stakeholder groups,
particularly with the City of Monticello acting as the point of contact between the Advisory
Committees and the planning consulting team. The planning consulting team includes the
Lakota Groups of Chicago, Illinois and WSB of Minneapolis.
Advisory Committee Composition
Each of the two committees should ideally be comprised of representatives from different
stakeholders and stakeholder groups.
The first group, the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), will provide guidance on matters
related to current planning context, public facilities, infrastructure, and public services. The TAC
will be responsible for in-depth review of the plan documents as they develop and act as
liaisons back to their representative boards regarding the plan.
The Community Advisory Committee (CAC) will provide structured guidance and feedback and
serve as the "Plan Champions." The CAC will be responsible for communicating plan concepts
to their representative groups and boards, encouraging and promoting event and community
meeting attendance. Importantly, the CAC will provide feedback on the big-picture concepts
that will shape the vision and comprehensive plan.
Potential committee membership and make-up is provided below, with other representatives to
be included as appropriate.
Technical Advisory Committee
❑ City Council (2)
❑ Planning Commission (1)
❑ Economic Development Authority (1)
❑ Parks and Recreation Commission (1)
❑ Monticello Independent School District Administration (1)
Community Advisory Committee
❑ Members from TAC
❑ Monticello Residents (3) (including one each from Monticello School District Monticello
Township and Shelburne Township areas)
❑ Wright County Commissioner (1)
❑ Industrial & Economic Development Committee (1)
❑ Township Board Representative (1)
❑ SHIP/Health Care Representative (1)
❑ Business Community Representative/ Chamber of Commerce Board Member (1)
❑ Youth Representative (1)
Other Groups/Organizations to Consider for Representative Participation
❑ City of Monticello — including representatives such as the Mayor and staff from key
departments
❑ Central Mississippi Regional Planning Partnership (formerly Highway 25 Coalition)
❑ Library Board
❑ Independent Educational Providers/Resources
❑ CentraCare – Monticello and other Community Health/Wellness Institutions
❑ State Health Institutional Provider/Representative
❑ Monticello Arts Initiative
❑ Civic Organizations
❑ Local Corporations and Significant Employers
❑ Wright and Sherburne County Representatives
❑ Churches and Religious Institutions
❑ Non-Profits, Advocates, Foundations, and other Community Organizations
❑ Financiallnstitutions
❑ Local Developers, Brokers, or Investors
Page 2
Advisory Committee Tasks
Members of the Advisory Committees are asked to commit to the following tasks. Please keep
in mind that the Vision and Comprehensive Plan process will be flexible and the following
meeting and event schedule may be adapted as need arises.
Phase 1 – Community Visioning
❑ Joint Technical & Community Advisory Committee Kick-Off (Meeting #1, Team
Visit #1) — a two (2) hour meeting scheduled for Friday, September 6t" from 4:30-
6:30 PM at the Monticello Community Center.
❑ TAC/CAC/City Council & Planning Commission Community Bus Tour – Scheduled
for Friday, September 6t" from 6:30-8:30 PM. Meet at the Community Center
❑ Community Kick-Off Celebration (Meeting #2, Team Visit #1) – informal meeting to
help launch the project, create awareness, and introduce the Comprehensive Plan
process to the community. Scheduled for Saturday, September 7t" from 3– 7 PM at
West Bridge Park. Kick-Off Celebration attendance is optional but recommended for
Advisory Committee members.
❑ Community Workshop 1(Meeting #4, Team Visit #2) – a two (2) hour interactive
workshop scheduled for early/mid-October (tentative) with community stakeholders to
review the planning process and gather feedback to help inform future vision and
development scenarios. Workshop attendance is optional but recommended for
Advisory Committee members.
❑ Joint Advisory Committee Meetings (Meeting #3, Team Visit #2) —meetings
scheduled for early/mid-October (tentative) to review issues raised at the Community
Workshop, provide direction and discuss progress to date.
❑ Technical Advisory Committee Review of Draft Vision Report (November 2019) — a
review of initial Vision Report findings in advance of the following Joint Advisory
Committee Meeting.
While the Advisory Committee will provide comments on deliverables throughout the
planning process, all deliverables will remain in draft form throughout the course of the
project and will not be revised without first receiving consent from the City. Two (2) to
four (4) hours may be required to review the Draft Plan and associated materials.
❑ Advisory Committee Meeting (Meeting #5, Team Visit #3) —meetings scheduled at a
date and time to be decided to formally present draft vision and development
recommendations and acquire feedback.
❑ Community Workshop 2(Meeting #6, Team Visit #3) – a two (2) hour interactive
workshop scheduled at a date and time to be decided with community stakeholders to
review and gather feedback on draft vision and development scenario recommendations.
❑ Technical Advisory Committee Review of Second Draft Vision Report (Winter
2019/2020) — a final review of the revised Vision Report findings in advance of the
following Public Review period and Municipal Work Session ahead of Vision Plan
adoption.
Page 3
Phase 2– 2040 Comprehensive Plan
❑ Advisory Committee Meetings (Meeting #7, Team Visit #6) —meetings scheduled for
Spring 2020 (tentative) to review Draft Comp Plan planning strategies and associated
concepts.
❑ Community Workshop #1 (Meeting #8, Team Visit #6) – a two (2) hour interactive
workshop with community stakeholders to review Draft Comprehensive Plan strategies
with the community at large. This Open House will also include topic and issue stations
for participants to circulate around and to provide input on specific Comprehensive Plan
elements as desired. A main emphasis of this community meeting is to educate the
community on comprehensive planning goals and opportunities and to validate their
adherence with the "Vision for Monticello." Tentatively scheduled for Spring 2020.
❑ Advisory Committee Review of Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Late Spring 2020)
— a review of the Draft Comp Plan Report in advance of the following Joint Advisory
Committee Meeting. Two (2) to four (4) hours may be required to review the Draft Plan
and associated materials.
❑ Advisory Committee Meeting (Meeting #9, Team Visit #7) — a two (2) hour meeting
scheduled for Summer 2020 (tentative) to review Draft Comp Plan planning strategies
and associated concepts, and brainstorm and provide feedback on Plan implementation
strategies.
❑ Community Open House/Interactive Forum (Meeting #10, Team Visit #7) – a two (2)
hour interactive open house to review the draft Comp Plan with the community and help
to educate residents on the comprehensive plan goals, strategies, and proposed
Monticello Vision. Tentatively scheduled for Summer 2020.
❑ Final Advisory Committee Review of Proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Summer
2020) — a final review of the revised Comprehensive Plan report in advance of formal
Municipal review and adoption.
Time Commitment
In all, Advisory Committee members will be expected to attend and review:
❑ Approximately ten (10) meetings and workshops, potentially totaling ten (10) to twenty
(20) total hours if all workshops and open houses are attended in addition to standard
meetings.
❑ Four (4) drafts of plan documents totaling eight (8) to sixteen (16) total hours.
Total time commitment for Advisory Committee participation over the course of the
planning process, including workshop attendance, is approximately eighteen (18) to
thirty-six (36) hours.
To ensure efficient transmission of information and to avoid duplicative feedback, all Advisory
Committee comments on the project deliverables should be provided directly to the City. City
staff will then consolidate all comments and contact Advisory Committee members as needed to
clarify issues or resolve any conflicts. One set of comments for each draft deliverable will then
be presented to the Lakota Group and the planning team. Copies of this one set of comments,
Page 4
will also be provided to both Advisory Committees, so everyone understands which comments
were provided to Lakota.
Page 5
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/03/19
3B. Communitv Development Director's Report
Council Action on Commission Recommendations
• Consideration to approve a request for Conditional tlse Permit for a detached
Accessory tlse Structure - Major in an R-1 (Single-Family Residence) Distric�
Applicant: Jerome Buboltz
City Council approved the request on August 26th, 2019 on the consent agenda.
• Consideration to approve a Preliminary and Final Plat and Development
Contract for Savitski Commercial Applicant: DJ's Properties, LLC
City Council approved the requests on August 26th, 2019 on the consent agenda.
• Consideration to approve a request for Conditional tlse Permit for a 92 unit
Multi family/Assisted Living Facility in the R-4 (1Vledium-High Density
Residence) Distric� Applicant: Monticello Senior Housing Owner, LLC-
Michael Hoagberg
City Council approved the CUP on August 12th, 2019 in a 4-1 decision.
Detached Accessory Structure Information
�During the August Planning Commission meeting, it was requested that staff provide
information on recent Detached Accessory Structure-Maj or information. Please find
attached a map illustrating 2017-2018 CUP approvals and details. The recent Buboltz
CUP request was the first for 2019.
Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan Update
Planning Commissioners should be aware of the following meetings and events related to
the Visioning component of the Comp Plan project. Chair Sam Murdoff will be
representing the Commission on the TAC. However, all Planning Commissioners are
encouraged to attend the Friday bus tour and Music on the Mississippi event on Saturday.
Friday, September 6th, 2019
• 7 AM - 9 AM: Joint Planning Commission/Council meeting at MCC
• 4:30-6:30 PM: Joint TAGCAC meeting at Prairie Center
• 6:30-8:30 PM: TAC/CAC/Commission/Council Bus Tour
Saturday, September 7th, 2019
• 3 PM - 7 PM: Encore Music on the Mississippi and Community Vision
Celebration at West Bridge Park
Great River Regional Trail
Please see attached flyer and invite.
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/03/19
Planning Commission Training
Please see attached for Government Training Services sessions. Please contact Jacob
Thunander or myself if interested in attending any session.
Please see the most recent City Council Connection and Highlights for other
important news:
https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/vertical/sites/%7B46185197-6086-4078-ADDC-
OF3918715C4C%7D/uploads/Council Connection(1).pdf
2
O
�
0
N
G1
U
U
�
G1
t
U
N
N
0
a
�
V
�
�
0
N
O
.�
�
�
O
N
U
a
�
v
t
U
N
N
0
a
�
V
n
r-I
0
N
T
nq
H
i
F �Lr'� `�r R � � +�,� f ��� �..�.,, �; ��� : �_" ������ �� � fM
'�\ �'� ��",. � µ �' . � i6 ��y 'Klr
`��� ��` "`'�j� '4 e p y�,�, I i* � ('_ �"
+G,. �" . [T.^: j "' �a ��y.�'+La.i� 4 ' � PF ,�I�� � � � �v��, �y ��{'
� . '�Fa �� y. �
• � �� ��', .. �'p; �"#,�'� �. - 4 '�' ''�§. �,. �ix .tl`� 4 �, �'��..y,,, �
y�' �+ ��:� .:�� � a ��,,�0. .y�$ � � �,y��.... �1"' 'l�
,��" . t . ,,y�. ��`r y !�-
,. �.' +e 1:4 ��, f �' ' .'� �IF � ^�� � �'� � ��` 4
!� � �: f� " ;�wr .t .� �. �1s: l� r� y��� ��� „f ..;�
�i' �� � . �� 14�h•� _ �� '� .v �� ~' �:� ��� � `- i y �, �
�
� �
�p"` ��• ��'�' �l;�' . ��I ..��. �.:�� ' ` �� �
i � ' �- � `
� 1 - � �
� �, �,� � � � • � '4 � „ � � - 1�..
�_ i � � r . ��ps 4k � � .�+' �
� � � I I � � �• � � �,� � +'' � �� Lrc��'" '��~�` � ��
�� . s�- . r! � �'�. i � - �--. �.� „��� -1� . . � - ..
_ �"— � . . e � ` . � a .�ta ,� � � �.
: A - w- f%' t .. .. ��� t ,f
' �lF.�,�,. °,�/� :a ' � ���� j � �� �� W• ,� ��i _ �� . �,+_ . �. `..�
x ,� .� } �
. � r ,.�� ,,_,� � i- �.��r "q�'�''.; N ��
- » �� � � � � -- V� � } — `' r � r; � +' �r^�`� , � q � ' ��'•!�
� { �`
. •" �. i
f � _ , � � - ,� � � � - � �;
`•,.�1...,,�' � � r �:��+ �"- �, « �, � � � � +� r.
, �-, -�� '� 'r� ; � �? ��' , i �i �k�
�� '� � _ � �� J
�' _ t - 1 ; � , .. = x, .� �-° �. > � +.
' , �� �_ .. r'.w ,' . � A ..... 1 �
� " �
' •> � � j� I + .. : ' '►Ar.��'-: �.
� � , � -,� � - ,. , ir� :r . . �`; -
��. -� r, ' � K - • �
�. �.P r e, _ :r �• � � +� � „,
..a+''; r'�
� ..1 . '� �.'. _. - y . .�. # `s r�'.
� � �' .� C�:y ` 1��' I� . - '����+' ,�j '� � _ i,�� 7�:.4 +
� t y ' ' Y, � - ` ,.1, I r r w " � . � � ''��p,:;
� r v �
� � w �--� � � !'� � "* ., �
,�,�� � r � �r 4' ..�
' . �6 k r'� � � , � ,_ � - ` � � � i�'��:�`+'. .,
�
�
p�
m
r
V
N
�
if
i
� -, . _ .... . ,��. ,. __ '_ � � jij
� . .� _ .. ^_...:'._'_. ' ,.. . . ...._._. . .� . � � �i
^ rw
.�e�w: `�- :�,+� w..�.... ..i --�._.
�,, � -' i' ; .'xt�` f: fJStJ ()��JfJ �
,.5, :.. r� +s^ -."9.�#► �.• . •!+►�i•
� , , ir `�,
F� ��. . , - r
, � � `�i ��� 9 � � � � +
_ _� � �
l�*"CJ'� � � �.. �*`�, � �• �%�" _ ��
t � � � , f � ��
� ` �
�' • ►''' �f'" � I'` � �"�' t.�"` ��,
� } � � ' '�a= •,,
� ' � Y'�` �:r � � _ .
��
� . '`i�,�? � , ,.. _, :r i�!'.
��"'�' '� , _
_a /d r_ � 7'J 1 �
Y
� e
�
� �7r
_ �
%
�
�
�
�
�
� �
�
+; O
��
L ^
{n Q
++ ^
� O � X
M O � O
� LL V i
++ � � Q
.� � � �
L L Vi
� � L �
O
�O � � O
O
� c�6 a N
2 Q � -a
� � � �
U
� � +�+ f0
X X � 41
W W � �'
N
N
� �
�
� �
�._�!n L
O Q-
� O � X
� �O � O
� � � Q
c � ; co
L L Vi
� � L �
O
�O � � O
� V U M
� co Q �
2 Q � -a
C C � �
.� .� � L
�n �n +� �p
X X � �
W W o �
��F,p►T RI VFR�P
FG�
02
�
�
�
� �
• •
�
• •
/ •
Wright County, in partnership with the cities
of Clearwater, Monticello, and Otsego, is
planning a regional trail along the Mississippi
River.Attend the Open Houseto learn about
the project and provide your input.
�r �r
� � �� z�
��
Monncello
health
Jacob Thunander
From: Land Use Planning <events@mngts.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 12:35 PM
To: I n fo
Subject: Jeff Back to Land Use school! Register now for September workshops
i::�- _�..° =��-� uu u� �u � �: �
i� � _ y �-�
� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
j �n a ena c�un ies.
�
i�
To Learn More About these Courses, Click Below!
This workshop is an abbreviated version of the Basics of
Planning & Zoning, covering the essential information needed
to understand planning, zoning and subdivision regulations.
Participants will learn how planning and zoning tools can assist
in development and redevelopment, as well as understand the
roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders involved
in the planning process. Topics covered include:
• Introduction to land use planning
• Tools used for planning and zoning
• Planning exercises
• Procedures in the planning process.
• Discussion and questions.
-
�_�_ _� � ._._� •. - _� _,� � � . e �F .
This workshop provides of overview of public engagement and
why it is critical to success of planners and policymakers. It
overviews the different techniques, when to provide them, and
tips for handling difficult situations.
z
��:�.� �>a �n a.v. i. �n . . . . �i . �.:. :'a tib a,'a,b' a� s% . �. � �r' . wd `'o.r'a,� . sn �D pt' ad . . � �r" . e;� :
1w_C] � TI E RN EY Sourcewell :
V Formerly NJPA
� ��
educationa/ events
Engage. Inspire. Inform.
GTS Educational Events � 1380 Energy Lane, Ste. 206, St. Paul, MN 55108
Unsubscribe infoCc�ci.monticello.mn.us
Uqdate Profile � About Constant Contact
Sent by events@mngts.org in collaboration with
Constan� Cantact�, . �
Try email marketing for free today!