Loading...
Planning Commission Agenda 10-01-2019AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, October lst, 2019 - 6:15 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Paul Konsor, and Alison Zimpfer Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Jacob Thunander, Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Special/Joint Meeting Minutes — August 6th, 2019 b. Regular Meeting Minutes — September 3rd, 2019 C. Citizen Comments D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda E. Consideration to approve agenda 2. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a request for amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 1 Use Standards and related sections as related to tattoo parlor and personal service uses. Applicant: Zachery Barthel 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration to accept the resignation of Planning Commissioner Marc Simpson and call for a special Planning Commission meeting B. Consideration of the Community Development Directors Report 4. Added Items 5. Adjournment MINUTES SPECIAL/JOINT MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, August 6th, 2019 - 4:45 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: John Alstad, Marc Simpson, and Paul Konsor Commissioners Absent: Sam Murdoff and Alison Zimpfer City Council Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Ron Hackenmueller 1. Call to Order Brian Stumpf called the Special/Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council to order at 4:45 p.m. 2. Concept Sta�e Planned Unit Development proposal for a 4 storv, 80-unit residential multi-familv apartment complex Applicant: Kent Kiellber� Steve Grittman introduced the staff report for the item. He noted that the original PUD was in place for the parcel to contain all multi-tenant commercial space. The request was to amend the remaining vacant space of the PUD for a multi-family development. Grittman noted staff concerns with having no direct access from a public street. It contained surface parking and at grade covered parking. He noted the proj ect would use the R-4 zoning. Grittman noted the site sits within a transitional zoning area to the mix of residential and commercial uses. It was noted the parcel is currently zoned B-4. Overall, the Planning Commission and City Council were concerned about access onto School Boulevard. It was noted that a traffic study to determine the amount of traffic would be important for a commercial or residential project. The design of the building was favorable. The boards also discussed the powerline easement. It was noted that the easement does not affect the parcel. Road and trail connections were discussed using this easement. Tom Wasmoen, the applicant's engineer, explained that the drawing was preliminary and could change. He said that he would work on addressing the access and traffic concerns. Grittman summarized the conversations from the boards. The applicant could apply for development stage PUD as a next step. 3. Adiournment Brian Stumpf adjourned the meeting at 5:54 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes (Joint Meeting) — August 6th, 2019 Page 1 � 2 Recorder: Jacob Thunander Approved: September 3rd, 2019 Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Planning Commission Minutes (Joint Meeting) — August 6th, 2019 Page 2 � 2 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September 3rd, 2019 - 6:15 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Sam Murdoff, Paul Konsor, and Alison Zimpfer Commissioners Absent: Marc Simpson and John Alstad Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order Sam Murdoff called the Regular Meeting of Monticello Planning Commission to order at 6:15 p.m. B. Consideration of approvin� minutes a. Re�ular Meetin� Minutes — Au�ust 6th, 2019 SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — AUGUST 6TH, 2019. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. C. Citizen Comments None. D. Consideration of addin� items to the a�enda None. E. Consideration to approve a�enda SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. 2. Public Hearings A. Continued Public Hearin� — Consideration of an amendment to Monticello Zonin� Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 Overlav Zonin� Districts, Subsection (E) Wild and Scenic Recreational River District for hei�ht allowances. Applicant: Citv of Monticello Angela Schumann explained that the item was a continued public hearing from the previous meeting. She noted that the current City regulation for height in the Wild and Scenic District is 35 feet and in the Shoreland District it is 25 feet. Staff recommended to remain consistent with DNR standards to change the City's ordinance to 25 feet in each district. Schumann explained that the DNR has reviewed the proposed changes and sent conditional approval of the ordinance amendment. Planning Commission Minutes — September 3rd, 2019 Page 1 � 4 Sam Murdoff continued the public hearing. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Paul Konsor asked for clarification on why the ordinance amendment was being sought. Schumann noted the goal was to remain consistent with state regulations and to also assist with development projects. Schumann also provided the history of the ordinance with the City of Monticello. Schumann explained that after City Council review, the DNR would have to certify the ordinance. ALISON ZINIPFER MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS 1N THE MISSISSIPPI WILD AND SCENIC RECREATIONAL R1VER OVERLAY DISTRICT AS PROPOSED, BASED ON FINDINGS 1N RESOLUTION PC- 2019-026. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. B. Public Hearin� — Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximatelv 875 square foot residential detached Accessorv Use Structure — Maior in an R-1 (Sin�le-Familv Residence) District. Applicant: Mick Herold Steve Grittman provided the report. He indicated that the applicant was seeking a 875 square foot accessory structure. The maximum size of the structure that could be built with a CUP is 876 square feet. It was noted that the lot was heavily wooded and the view of the proposed structure would not be noticeable. He explained that all of the criteria for a Conditional Use Permit was met and recommended approval with Exhibit Z comments. Sam Murdoff opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to speak first. Mick Herold, the applicant, introduced himsel£ Murdoff asked if the applicant had reviewed the Exhibit Z conditions. Herold confirmed with no issues. Murdoff asked about the removal of trees for the proj ect. Herold indicated a small elm would need to be removed and that was it. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed. ALISON ZIMPFER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2019-027 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PROPOSED APPROXIMATELY 875 SQUARE FOOT STRUCTURE, SUB7ECT TO THE CONDITIONS 1N EXHIBIT Z, AND BASED ON FINDINGS 1N SAID RESOLUTION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. EXHIBIT Z Mick Herold Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building — Major 9721 Gillard Avenue Northeast Planning Commission Minutes — September 3rd, 2019 Page 2 � 4 Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. 2. The accessory building shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials including color. 3. Access to the structure will remain on the property, with no rear yard driveway. 4. An updated certificate of survey illustrating the proposed structure and staking of property lines and setbacks will be required at building permit to verify setback requirements. 5. No overstory trees should be removed without City administrative approval. 6. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. �. � �. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration appoint Chairman Sam Murdoff to the Monticello 2040 Communitv Vision & Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisorv Committee PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO NOMINATE CONINIISSIONER SAM MURDOFF AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATNE TO MONTICELLO 2040 COMMUNITY VISION + COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. ALISON ZIMPFER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. B. Consideration of the Communitv Development Directors Report Angela Schumann provided the Community Development Director's Report. She noted that a special meeting would occur before the October Planning Commission meeting for a Land Use Basic refresher. 4. Added Items t� None. � 5. Adjournment SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 6:41 P.M PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander Approved: October 1, 2019 Attest: Planning Commission Minutes — September 3rd, 2019 Page 3 � 4 Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Planning Commission Minutes — September 3rd, 2019 Page 4 � 4 Planning Commission Agenda 10/O1/2019 2A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a repuest for amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 1 Use Standards and related sections as related to tattoo parlor and personal service uses. Applicant: Zacherv BartheL (NAC) Property: Planning Case Number: PID: 155500114201 Address: 500-560 Cedar Street 2019-030 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance creating an allowance for Tattoo (Body Art) establishments as an allowed use in the Business and CCD Districts Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: 11/03/2019 General Application - Downtown Zoning Designation: The purpose of the "CCD", Central Community District, is to provide for a wide variety of land uses, transportation options, and public activities in the downtown Monticello area, and particularly to implement the goals, obj ectives, and specific directives of the Comprehensive Plan, and in particular, the 2017 Downtown Monticello "Small Area Plan" Comprehensive Plan Amendment and its design and performance standards. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: NA Retail Shopping Center Amendment applies to City of Monticello Multi Family Residential East: Multi Family Residential South: Multi Family Residential West: Retail Commercial/Office Project Description: The applicant proposes to amend the zoning ordinance to incorporate tattoo establishments into the zoning ordinance as an allowed use in the downtown area. The zoning ordinance includes a definition for Tattoo, but Planning Commission Agenda 10/O1/2019 limits it as a use to the B-4, Regional Business zoning district. The proposal is to expand Tattoo (or `Body Art" as it is generally referenced by the Minnesota Department of Health) is included as one of the specified uses under the category of "Personal Services". ANALYSIS For many years, Tattoo was an unregulated service that occasionally raised concerns over health and welfare conditions in the facility or the area in which the facility was located. As such, most cities severely limited the location of tattoo establishments to avoid potential issues. As of 2013, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) established a licensing program and standards, pursuant to legislation passed by the Minnesota legislature in 2010. While Monticello's zoning ordinance defines tattoo and tattooing, it restricts tattooing under the Personal Services land use category to the B-4, Regional Business zoning district. With more comprehensive State regulation in place, it is reasonable to consider expanding the allowance for tattoo facilities (including `Body Art" which is the category used by MDH), to the general Personal Services use. PERSONAL SERVICES: Establishments that primarily engage in providing services generally involving the care of the person or person's possessions. Personal services may include but are not limited to: laundry and dry-cleaning services, barber shops, beauty salons, health and fitness studios, music schools, informational and instructional services, tanning salons, bodv art includin� tattooin�), and portrait studios. TATTOO, TATTOOING: Any method of placing designs, letters, scrolls, figures, symbols or any other mark upon, under or in the skin with ink or any other substance resulting in the coloration of the skin by the aid of needles or any other instruments which puncture any portion of the skin to any degree. BODY ART: Establishments that enga�e in "Bodv art" or "bodv art procedures" includin� phvsical bodv adornment usin�, but not limited to, tattooin� and bodv piercin .� Bodv art does not include practices and procedures that are performed bv a licensed medical or dental professional if the procedure is within the professional's scope of practice. 2 Planning Commission Agenda 10/O1/2019 (21) Personal Services (c) Tattoo � facilities and providers shall be r��*ri�*��' *� *'��'� ^ � required to com�ly with the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health licensin� requirements and re�,ulations, and display evidence of such compliance in a conspicuous location within the establishment. The Zoning District use tables (in part) are included below to provide additional context as to the allowances and requirements of the Personal Services use category: u5es: Brew Pub <10,04fl sq. fc. Brew Pub � I 0,400 sq. ft. Corramercial Day Care Cormmercial Lodging EnterrainmentlRecrea�ion, Indoor Commercial (including theaters) EntertainmentJRecreation Outdoor Commercial Funeral Serviees Personal Services Places of Public Assembly Production 6rewerylTapraom Micra DiseillerylCocktail Raom Professional O�ce -Services an Retail Financial , Bars < I O,C , Bars ? I Qf z10,000 sq. CUP P CUP P CUP ClJ P CUP ` CUP P JP�` CUP* CUP* CUP � f 0.000 sq. CUP P P P P CUP UP CUP CUP CUP � CUP P P P P CUP" - nnt P1CUP'� on PICIJP�` P allowed on ground an ground ;raund ffoor iloor f�oor � P P P UpperFloars preferred UpperFlaors preferred Drive thru by CUP 3 Planning Commission Agenda 10/O1/2019 ■ . - r �. - - • - - � Comrnercia! ilses EntertainmentlRecreation, p P C C C S.�iF)( � 2l Indoor Comr�ercial EntertainmentlRecreatian, C �C C C� 5.2{�F [ � 3} Outdoar Commercial Finaneial Inscitution I P C P 5.2(F}f I4} Funeral Services P P 5.2{�( I 5) Kennels (commercialJ C 5.2(�( I 6� Landscaping ! I�lursery p 5 2{F�t 17} Business Personal Ser�ices G P P P 5.2{F)f2� Production 6rewery ar Micra-Distilles-� without P P 5.2[�(10� Taproom Praduction Brewery or 5 �(�(23) Micro-Distillery with C C C C C ���( I I� Taproom or Coektaif Room Reereational Vehicle Camp � 5 �{�f�41 Site Repair Esu6lishment G P P P P 5.2(J[25] Resrzurants C P P C 5.2(�(2b1 Retail Commercial Lpses (flther) Buildings Less than P P P 5.2(F1[27� I O,UOU 5F Retail Commercial LYses (other} Buildings O�er IO,D00 G P P 5.�{F)f27� SF With the addition of the State's licensing program, there would not seem to be any significant concerns related to health or general welfare issues — the common elements on which the City's zoning authority is based. The amendment would clarify the allowances for the use in the City's commercial areas. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1. Add Tattoo establishments as a use included in the Personal Services use category and include references to the State licensing requirements: L Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2019-028 recommending approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment to specifically address Tattoo establishments as an use included in the Personal Services category and allowed where other such uses are allowed, based on the findings in said Resolution � Planning Commission Agenda 10/O1/2019 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. PC2019-028, recommending denial of the Ordinance Amendment, based on findings to be identified following the public hearing. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution, subj ect to additional information from staff or applicant. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment clarifying the status of Tattoo establishments in the Personal Services use category. The use has a rigorous requirement for State licensing and should pose no extraordinary issues for local land use regulation as a result of the licensing program. The applicant's property is located in the Pine Street subarea of the CCD where Personal Services are a Permitted Use and as such, tattoo services in this sub-district would be permitted upon adoption of the proposed amendment. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution No. PC 2019-028 B. Draft Zoning Ordinance Amendment C. Applicant Narrative D. CCD Sub-District Map E. Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts F. Official Zoning Map 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-028 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE TATTOO SERVICES AND ESTABLSHMENTS AS AN INCLUDED PERSONAL SERVICE ALLOWED IN THE SAME COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS AND ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE USE WHEREAS, an applicant has submitted a request to amend the Zoning Ordinance to include Tattoo services as a common Personal Service; and WHEREAS, the effect of the amendment would be to include Tattoo services in any of those areas where Personal Services are otherwise allowed; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has established generally applicable licensing requirements for tattoo establishments and providers; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would incorporate those State requirements into the City's zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the use, under State licensing regulation, would raise no issues for the City with regard to public health or welfare beyond those common to other Personal Service uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October lst, 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The Zoning Ordinance amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering both the intent and the specific goals and policies for land use in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use raises no extraordinary issues for the City's regulation of Personal Services. 3. The ordinance incorporates applicable provisions of State law and regulation regarding Tattoo establishments, thus providing a protection for the public. 4. The proposed use is expected to have no negative impacts on municipal public services. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2019-028 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Zoning Ordinance amendment, based on the findings listed above. ADOPTED this lst day of October, 2019, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING CONINIISSION : ATTEST: Sam Murdock, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 1 AND RELATED SECTIONS, DEFINING AND REGULATING PERSONAL SERVICES AND TATTOO PARLORS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 5.2 (D) — Regulations for Commercial Uses is hereby amended to read as follows: �h (21) Personal Services (c) Tattoo � facilities and providers shall be r��*ri�*��' *� *'��'� ^ � required to com�lv with the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health licensin� requirements and re�,ulations, and display evidence of such compliance in a conspicuous location within the establishment. Section 2. Section 8.4 - Definitions is hereby amended to read as follows: PERSONAL SERVICES: Establishments that primarily engage in providing services generally involving the care of the person or person's possessions. Personal services may include but are not limited to: laundry and dry-cleaning services, barber shops, beauty salons, health and fitness studios, music schools, informational and instructional services, tanning salons, bod.�includin� tattooin�), and portrait studios. Section 3. Section 8.4 — Definitions is hereby amended to add the following: BODY ART: Establishments that engage in providing "Body art" or "body art procedures" including physical body adornment using but not limited to, tattooing and body piercing. Body art does not include practices and procedures that are performed by a licensed medical or dental professional if the procedure is within the professional's scope of practice. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ATTEST: � Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: 2 Hello city of Monticello, before I launched into Dark Horse Vapery and The Nordic Brewing Co., I used to own Empire Tattoo and have been Tattoo Artist for 12 years. I would like to open a private by appointment only licensed studio space within all of the extra-unused space I have at the Hillside Mall. This would be a private area licensed through the department of health and I would not be doing any advertising or having any signage. My hopes are to work with 1 or possibly 2 clients a week. As you all know I am very busy with my other company projects. To establish this use, the zoning ordinance would require amendment, as tattoo parlors are currently restricted to B-4 (Regional Business) Districts. The amendment would need to permit tattoo studios/parlors within the CCD (Walnut & Cedar sub-district), in which the space is located. As the city considers an amendment, it may also review the potential to allow the tattoo studio use in other commercial districts. Thank you for the consideration and all the help thus far! Sincerely: Zachery M. Barthel CH�PT�� 3: Zt��it�6�` L7iST�tiCTS Section 3.5 Business Base Zoning Districts S�sh�e�ti�a� (� �'Pr�trc�l Community District �'.:i1�� u ..� .s ,;��s'`. - � ��- . ,�ra - X :, r� ��, y� p r,, � ,� � / � � m � � �� �P �.�t�J� . �` '�f�t f!� � �,.. a. M� �� �* ��$g� :'� ".'}.,�,e� ,� '� �4' js ,� � .,v St'o�.y1 ��: �Kj � '�t' � '�'f . �� �� f ''� � f v�'`� �'F P� �� 4 � r t�M. ,�. "�r L I�I � � � �p�•4 � � ��e rt "'F� ��u . � '^ � . 4 �'. l d 41F y'�i i�� }1� .� �j'� �A`� .� I ��:.. �� �' � O �, d �:' �� '� iyi, } .+} t :. �y ik ' f � � ` � , ;�- �,� � " � � � ` � � ��� II a � � rPl., ��.� > r .;k ¢ 1Y` r � q�P �, .. ` ' � '' � � _ $F'�f � , [ � `y4 ,� � �d.,:. '�:� b � "� � 3 � ,�'�► r � ; �'�4 -��f �,� '���� 's�a ,'W'- � . � �y � : i , � tr � M �p S+v - ��'+ 'F . V � dM ' tr � �.. .:� W � � y� e�, ;* i ��� Y. 'M r rr Yr � 'A�' �� % ►� ' �- L ,M1r . !Y { y"" � � +,#� � � �S''o�v,��, �� "� �+ �,�y� h� ' � '�"..,1 � � � .�1 ,��' `re'� � �l�a. r �' ,. -" x "� ` S� , � . �_� ! }�.-1,�� o� . � . ym ' a` �, s � � , / � k� '�.�a„ !+�. � �� � � .-�.'r � Tir� ��~ tyl�C..'� ! �tc+4r �' y � ,� 's+.i.'�., � 4,: Fx':.j�, � 1 +� � � r,l[L L,�� f .+i[ 1`�y µ-�'�� 3y.,� ��y�� {� lyE � A �i � � � � y�q�`A � � . y � ' y �k,� A�T' 1S �� $� t Ji''� rx ��. �Jf�ti� 4i 4SI�.�W q�a,. V r.� ��1�, s ..,� � ' � ., y i� � 4` ,.4 �4 _j � ` .�{ �{Pd . , 1a i9' ar �' � . ��`�r, yT r ,� 'n�,.�i `+. ++F' a� � ���' v�, �-�r..R � f _ � •. ; e �� ' . � a7 ��a'. t �" l i ' � � - a°'� fig � �� y�� °� � � � j� r�,r ��t � � :F'� • � � . 1 . �i ' o uyn '`" L`'� �%� � fY'S .�� � .,.. .. 1 !� ,�_� '� � ,�� �y ,, a z.._ � �,�:��t; . �,� � ,`� � � �.. h � v � , •'� � •{ - �� F F�� �' � � � . �� � wy . : � •� . , �re��: . w �''M k � .y�� r ,���e � i . . � �Ea. "t� .. `1G:'. y *' 1 _:� 'i !3. . @�� t b.��' i#�.i are. ,� �P ' �' � '�' ,�. ;°3 +� ':o. �', �^- .. ,� , �, ` � ,-°' �ar. i �'�" �"�`a` +�,1 f S�a �' �''' , V�;,�� f �F . � � y �,� v � � i � �8a r I �W F�� ,. .' , � � r . � � �1 � � L � i'_ ''" I ;_ .,: � `_; fi '� .. "-',. •a � �,.., '� � �SrRer� .'' `�'h.... � � d�� . � i . ,., ` � � B � �s SR�y� - � . . . _ -�'. � d [; ! t` � A �.' 3` '9 � 4 �� { - ,�'�h , 1 r*��4y,., . , jf � � . S c��7 � . t� +�# �; ' +� �r t' ty, F4 �! � �n'.bl ` � .. 4 � � s.� �� ��jyi . Sl � y 4Y+ � � �t t ... � � �� Rf �� �we� � R+� f � � e_ ,� l� � � � `� s� . e J. , +�`� Yr`A. 'F ' ,� '� �'" ��y T � — .�'��r�� . E C -�y. _ . � � � J l °- �S=" � r" ,•�-- ��; � `'� ,�. -. • 't�,r . ffi",my r °� 't, r,,.y' �+. _ i k•�•,� �ry?; j � s. - +yL v f . ra+* T �'.'..r � A ��A, . �,. � �"`�� . h� js `�� f`�F }, �� .:,` � . � - � � ��� .,; :�r .�. M k .wr r �+.� +��� � ■ �, . �s �, •� :a .. � � °tioa� . � �`w� ' f � .. � �- �� e� a 1 " ,� r e . a+.y�, . �� � ,.. d �. �� � s'� a�..: � � � � .� � `� '.�.�s '� .ti � ;; :. r� ; .y+ *r. � } �� ..�• � .�.� �+,� j , �' '�f. '-� .. �•,'�e� . �• v+. �' �r tt "� W .f � � �3r ,'�y�,�„ y�,� �� �� �,�^{V; � � ,� r _ . � as ,* "" a � � °'��c d` , � p+o-a '';^�R '� N, t ' � ``,' '!r- ,w� ° �i � y�� �.. � g�� � �5 !a .,; I . � t�c' � ' � f . . f' fsu. �.'� � - �}+ ~ � �� "�i{�'� �x � $ �� Y �A ra �� ;; a ; �+ J # � oi � : ,� 'r g� • ' � r • . � ,a� � �. � a � � �3 's--� � ,>4r� }F ` i � L m � = �4 � +'��� � ,fi,f � Sa ar 7�vr ro( { �r' � ��r• ��T � t°�k -.w.. . n _ '+� �,�, *� .� � h -,n. T3 � �.. ��i �� , � ^ � .. "�s .., _ �. z� � t a 'k +�f' �, .,� ! ' y. � �" " �- ; i '�•}� "� 3 t; � m � � �. �„y a� �J 'K.w . � .- ' :4 � G . h���'� . '1 �� , 3'$ �� m � '� m � .s � � .. . ; .r � �-. ��i; . . � ' ' f. `5...: .. }' . ; S �,. �. S . . � w' r�. � �i. ��� �t,. : •' a",y. r�rp F ,�� k � ;...��`1 i � ,� ra 4-j.� �. `� s � � � 1 g`�r '� � _ J I._1 � � �,s � _ ; � � �. Yy e4��; - Z �� 37}� 46+ y� �� r� = � E� � p � . '� � , g y 2e � � � .. ii � « U ' � r F . - � � F�� � � b`ti. ! A� �" .s u7 t: ? �� � �a a r�,� • y '�- � o m � -'��,.� c+ ;�, °� � « „ � � `� � � � � y . il1 r _._-�w�� . � �n V r n Y � ��... �. � �:.� _ � � _ �Ax �x�� :.� U � �su�. .'� L.L. � .. . . , .v�Al ::�...4a'.a� ,_ U M :.j vj /1�OIlUC�'r`iU �Ui'Ytis� UiC`iilFi7IF%f' Cf-l�il�i`E� S: i�5� Si��f��t�L35 Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Scrbsection (F) Regulations for Commercial Uses (b) Street-level floor planning designed to accommodate use by or conversion to future use as retail land uses. (19) Offices (Commercial) In the CCD, the following conditions shall apply: (a) Building architecture shall be designed to reflect retail street-level architecture as defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and detailed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment entitled "Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan." (b) Street-level floor planning designed to accommodate use by or conversion to future use as retail land uses. (c) Parking areas shall be situated so as to minimize their exposure to public areas, or shall be landscaped and screened to minimize large expanses of open pavement. (20) Offices (Professional) Including Financial Institutions In the CCD, the following conditions shall apply: (a) Building architecture shall be designed to reflect retail street-level architecture as defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and detailed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment entitled "Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan." (b) Street-level floor planning designed to accommodate use by or conversion to future use as retail land uses. (c) Parking areas shall be situated so as to minimize their exposure to public areas, or shall be landscaped and screened to minimize large expanses of open pavement. (d) Parking supply shall be calculated at the same rate as retail sales. (21) Personal Services (a) In the B-1 district, the following shall apply: (i) Outdoor lighting shall be restricted to be consistent with the hours of operation, within one half hour of open and close times. (ii) Hours of operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. �i�y o� �Von�eeiio �aning �r�trr��r�4.� 6s�ge .�� � ���P��� �: 115� S°1`.�P�fCi��i�S Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (F) Regulations for Commercial Us,:�� (b) Establishments engaged in dry cleaning shall be held to the following requirements: (i) Dry cleaning processing shall be restricted to the B-4 district. (ii) Dry cleaning operations shall be self-contained in terms of noise and fumes with no venting to outside of building. (iii) Dry cleaning facilities shall have direct access to major thoroughfare via driveway or frontage road. (c) Tattoo parlors shall be restricted to the B-4 district. (22) Places of Public Assembly In the CCD, the following conditions shall apply: (a) Building architecture shall be designed to reflect retail street-level architecture as defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and detailed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment entitled "Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan." (b) Site planning shall minimize parking lot development adjacent to public areas in the district, including streets, pathways, and open spaces. (23) Production Breweries and Micro-Distilleries with Accessory Taproom or Cocktail Room Production Breweries and Micro-Distilleries with Accessory Taproom or Cocktail Room shall be allowed by conditional use permit in the CCD, B-3 and B-4 Districts, provided that: (a) The owner of the brewery qualifies for and receives a brewer license and a malt liquor wholesale license from the State of Minnesota, according to Minn. Statutes Section 340A.301. (b) The Brewery or Micro-Distillery includes an accessory brewer's taproom or cocktail room for the on-sale of products produced on-site, and such room shall require the applicable license from the City of Monticello, according to City Code Section 3-1-13. (c) On-site sale of beer in the form of growlers shall require a Brewery License for Off-Sale of Ma1t Liquor, according to City Code Section 3-1-13. Off-sale hours of sale must conform to hours of sale for retail off-sale licensees in the City of Monticello. r'��� .���: �;�f�� �� �Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te Planning Commission Agenda — 10/O1/19 3A. Consideration to accept the resi�nation of Plannin� Commissioner Marc Simpson and call for a special Plannin� Commission meetin�. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission is asked to consider posting for candidates interested in serving on the Commission. The posting is in advance of the anticipated vacancy on the Commission, which is pending the resignation of Commissioner Simpson later this year. To prepare for that vacancy, staff would like to post the opening, with interviews to be held in late November, 2019. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to post an opening on the Monticello Planning Commission. 2. Motion of other. C. SUPPORTING DATA: Planning Commission Agenda - 10/O1/19 3B. Communitv Development Director's Report Council Action on Commission Recommendations • Continued Public Hearing — Consideration of an amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 Overlay Zoning Districts, Subsection (E) Wild and Scenic Recreational River District for height allowances. Applicant: City of Monticello Approved on consent agenda on September 23''d 2019 • Public Hearing — Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 875 square foot residential detached Accessory Use Structure — Major in an R-1 (Single-Family Residence) District. Applicant: Mick Herold Approved on the consent agenda on September 9th, 2019. Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan Update Please see attached update on previous, current and upcoming Monticello 2040 activities. Planning Commission members will also be asked to complete Sounding Board cards as part of the October meeting. MN APA Planning Conference The Community Development Director will be attending the state planning conference from September 25-27th. An update on seminars and information of note will be provided as part of the November agenda. Chelsea to School Boulevard Planning Planning Commissioners are asked to watch their email for a potential Commission- Council j oint workshop date related to land use planning concepts for the commercial area between Chelsea Road and School Boulevard, between Cedar Street and Edmonson Avenue. Commissioners may recall that a developer has proposed a residential multi- family use in the area. Since that time, staff and NAC have been working on further developing a land use concept for the area. The goal is to have a workshop to gain additional direction from the Planning Commission and City Council on this mixed-use concept in October, prior to a regular City Council meeting. The concept presented as part of the packet for the developer's concept stage submittal is attached for reference. Please see the most recent City Council Connection and Highlights for other important news: https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/vertical/sites/%7B46185197-6086-4078-ADDC- OF3918715C4C%7D/uploads/Additional Information(13).pdf CITY QF �:�� �Dr1t1C��a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan The kick-off events for Monti2040 were a success! Thanks to all who attended the introductory Technical and Community Advisory Committee meetings September 6t" and 7t"! We had great attendance on the community bus tour (see pic at right) and although it was a cold and drizzly day, great feedback was received at the Music on the Mississippi event on Saturday. There are now Monticello 2040 Sounding Boards located around town. The Sounding Boards teature tour key questions to help us better understand Monticello's strengths, challenges, vision, and values. There are Sounding Boards located in each of the 5 school faculty rooms, the MontiArts building, the Monticello library, City Hall, and Bluestone Grill! Staff will also be working with two Monticello classrooms on a Sounding Board exercise this month. In addition, the Sounding Board is available in digital form at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/montisurvey1. Quick polls will also pop up from time to time on the City's Monti2040 webpage. The swans have even gotten in on the 2040 act! We are also looking forward to two upcoming planning events for Monticello 2040: TAC/CAC Pep Rally Event: To be scheduled the week of October 16tn Community Workshop Events: the next visit by the Lakota Group, is set for October 315t_ November 2nd. This visit will include: o Stakeholder meetings o Joint TAC/CAC worksession o Community open house at the MCC (the craft show will be held at MCC the same day for a big crowd!). o We are also hoping to hold an Urban Land Institute forum — Navigating Your Competitive Future, which features a developer and development professional roundtable to offer additional insight into Monti2040 planning. , . � i � 'i � ., ... �■■�i�' � - : ` •',� - '� !► .. ►