The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Agenda 08-04-2020AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 4th, 2020 - 6:15 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Meeting will occur in person with recommended social distancing procedures in place for the Commission, staff, and public. Commissioners: Sam Murdoff, John Alstad, Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, and Alison Zimpfer Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Stafi Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Regular Meeting Minutes — July 7th, 2020 b. Special/Joint Meeting Minutes — July 7th, 2020 C. Citizen Comments D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda E. Consideration to approve agenda 2. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a request for Amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance to Chapter 3.5, Business Base Zoning Districts, Subsection (G) Central Community District and Chapter 4.5 Signs related to transparency of window signage in the Downtown; and Chapter 5.1 Use Table and Chapter 8.4 Definitions as related to Mobile & Manufactured Home/Home Park; and Chapters 3.4 Residential Base Zoning Districts and 5.3, Accessory Use Standards as related to building materials references for accessory buildings. Applicant: City of Monticello 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of the Community Development Director's Report 4. Added Items 5. Adjournment MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, July 7th, 2020 - 6:15 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Sam Murdoff, Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, and Alison Zimpfer Commissioners Absent: John Alstad Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order Sam Murdoff called the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 6:15 p.m. B. Consideration of approvin� minutes a. Re�ular Meetin� Minutes — June 2nd, 2020 PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — J UNE 2N�, 2020. ALISON ZIMPFER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. C. Citizen Comments None. D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda None. E. Consideration to approve agenda ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. 2. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a repuest for Conditional Use Permit for an approximatelv 728 sauare foot residential detached Accessorv Building — Maior in an R-1 (Single-Familv Residence) District. Applicant: Kevin & Sara Haman Steve Grittman introduced the item and noted that a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) was being sought for the construction of a second rear yard garage for parking and residential storage for property located at 10051 Prescott Drive. Grittman provided an overview of the location of the property and the location where the proposed garage would be located. He noted that the staff report incorrectly identified the existing garage as 690 square feet and should be amended to state 770 square feet. The proposed total garage space was just under 1,500 square feet. Grittman noted that the total of garage space with a CUP could be between 1,200 and 1,500 square feet. The CUP standards were reviewed by Grittman and noted compliance with those conditions. Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 Page 1 � 9 Staff recommended approval of the request subject to conditions identified in Exhibit Z. Grittman reviewed each condition, but noted that the applicants were concerned with installing the brick wainscot to the front of the structure. Grittman added that the City seeks to approve accessory structures that are similar in appearance to the principle building. He also noted that the color of the structure should at least be complimentary and he encouraged assessor structures to match wherever possible. It was thought that the siding color would be easier to match, compared to the brick/stone. Sam Murdoff noted that the Planning Commission is familiar with these CUP requests. He noted unfamiliarity with the requirement for the installation of brick wainscot on the front from previous requests for accessory structures and asked if it was forgotten in previous applications. Grittman responded that the standard had applied to recent CUP requests for detached accessory structures and some applicants have proposed it in the past. The most recent request for a CUP for an accessory structure was for an attached garage, where the code did not apply. Grittman stated that the condition was routinely applied to these types of requests if the structure would be visible. He noted that the applicant suggests it is barely visible and would like to avoid such addition to the structure. Andrew Tapper clarified that the brick wainscot was in place to match the principle building. Grittman confirmed and noted that the current Zoning Code requires properties in the R-1 to have a percentage of brick wainscot on the front of their principle structures. It was unclear whether Groveland 2"d Addition was constructed during the time the code for the wainscot on principle structures existed. Sam Murdoff opened the public hearing and invited the applicants to speak first. Sara and Kevin Haman, the applicant, introduced themselves and noted that they have lived in the home since 2001 and have outgrown the current garage space. Sara Haman noted that they have lived in the house for almost twenty years and to find matching siding would be difficult. She noted that they were hoping to go darker gray and something that would be complimentary. She provided samples of the material color. She also stated the desire to not have the brick on the front of the structure and noted a detached accessory structure along Brentwood Drive, a nearby neighborhood, without brick. Charlotte Gabler asked if the existing home was white or gray. Haman responded it's a light gray. Gabler noted similarities when she had to re-side her home and was unable to purchase the exact same color. Gabler had no concerns with the gray coloring. Gabler asked if they were mainly looking for flexibility on the removal of the condition regarding a brick wainscot. Haman's did not believe it would negatively impact the property value and indicated that the visibility is very minimal especially when the leaves on the trees come back They had pictures ready to share with the Planning Commission. They also noted they live on a curve and it would probably be a half of a second view if driving by at 30 mph. Gabler asked if there was alternative option instead of the brick required by code. Grittman explained the code states a masonry finish such as brick, stone, or Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 Page 2 � 9 similar. Gabler asked if there was a similar product to the brick, could that be used. Grittman noted there are a lot of brick veneer products and the codes intent for an aesthetic purpose rather than material style. Haman's reiterated that since the structure would have so little visibility that it not be a requirement of the approval and that it just be vinyl sided. Murdoff asked if the applicants planned to purchase the completely built shed or build it on site. Kevin Haman responded they would build it. Paul Konsor asked if the applicants were able to review and were accepting of the conditions in Exhibit Z. Haman's confirmed. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Murdoff was not inclined to include the brick wainscot front on the proposed structure and noted a development where the City didn't require brick on the fa�ade of a detached accessory structure. Paul Konsor stated they should get clarification on whether it should be required or not for future applications. Because it is such a small portion of brick, Konsor also agreed that the brick wainscot was unnecessary. Angela Schumann stated that there was a recent CUP approval along River Street for a property owned by Buboltz. The detached accessory structure was visible from the street and required to have a brick or stone consistent with their house. There was another CUP approval in River Forest that required the brick wainscot. Schuman noted that there was some subjectivity, but that the code states what is visible from the street will require some similarity in materials. Grittman noted that an alternative would be to have a nominal amount of shrub plantings (possibly evergreen) that would screen the view of the building rather than the brick This planting could be near the front building line or near the proposed structure and block the view from the street. Staff discussed that a variance might need to be sought if the condition was removed. Zimpfer asked how much the brick would cost for the project. Kevin Haman did not have that amount. Zimpfer noted that it would take several years for the shrubs to grow and screen. Grittman stated that the code is written to say that if you plant shrubs for screening, it will take a few years to grow and fully screen. It was noted that screening would fulfill the requirement and more discussion would need to occur if the Planning Commission would only remove the condition for brick wainscot as to whether a variance would be necessary. Murdoff asked for clarification that the code states that accessory structures are required a brick wainscot. Schumann read verbatim of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.11 that requires accessory structures — major in the R-1 to provide 15 percent of the front building fa�ade less the square footage of the garage doors should be covered in brick or stone if visible from the street. Schumann also read the code that stated the Community Development Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 Page 3 � 9 Department may approve optional fa�ade treatments when additional architectural detailing so warrants, but it seems to encourage additional alternatives such as front porches, roof pitch, and other features. Murdoff asked the applicants how they preferred to move forward. Kevin Haman noted that he preferred to plant shrub in the front and that would also help to cover the electrical boxes. Schumann noted that the language in the Zoning Ordinance regarding the building materials came from a desire to have high amenity housing and keeping the housing attractive. Schumann indicated that the standards apply to the existing property, just as they would a new property. SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PG2020-019, ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED 1N EXHIBIT Z OF THIS REPORT WITH THE ADDITION OF COLOR AND TYPE OF BUILDING BE SIlV1ILAR AND/OR COORDINATING AND THAT THEY HAVE A BRICK FRONT OR SHRUBBERY PLANTED. SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit for Garage 10051 Prescott Drive Lot 7, Block 4, Groveland 2"d Addition The e�terior materials used to finish the accessory structure must match the existing home in material type and color, including a wainscot treatment of brick similar to that of the principal building front. 2. No e�terior lighting be attached to the garage that will glare onto adjoining property. The disturbed areas of the site shall be seeded or sodded within one (1) calendar year of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 4. The City Engineer review the plans and address any drainage concerns. The applicants shall adhere to any follow up recommendations by the City Engineer. 5. The applicant is responsible for any and all damage that may happen to any utilities during construction of the project. 6. No business or home occupation shall be allowed in either the attached or detached garage. 7. The applicant shall provide an updated survey with the building permit. 8. The applicant obtains a building permit prior to construction. Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 Page 4 � 9 B. Public Hearin� — Consideration of a request for variance to the required 10' side vard setback in the Mississippi Wild Scenic Recreational River District in the R-1 (Sin�le-Familv Residence) District. Applicant: Chris Holtz Steve Grittman introduced the request for variance to side yard setback to accommodate a house and garage/storage addition (two levels) for property located at 305 Riverview Drive. The property is located in the R-1 District and the MWSRR District. The current side yard setback in the MWSRR is 10 feet. Grittman provided the site aerial and survey. A unique aspect of the property is a shared driveway with the easterly property exists along the lot line. The proposed expansion would occur on the west side of the parcel and it was noted that a significant slope exists downward from the addition to the driveway. The garage addition on the upper level would face south, with the lower level garage facing east. Grittman noted that an updated survey was received later that day and shows that the applicant plans to add driveway space that veers off near the intersection and provides driveway and a parking pad for the upper level garage. Staff acknowledged that they initially didn't realize the proposal included two levels and have worked with the applicant to shift the upper building to the east to minimize the setback encroachment and to modify the lower level floor plan so that they are not exceeding the standard threshold for accessory garage space of 1,200 square feet. Grittman further added that the applicant was able to modify the original application from an approximately 3.3 to 3.5 foot encroachment to a 1.9 foot encroachment or an 8.1 foot setback. Grittman reviewed the e�terior elevations and interior footprint of the building with the Planning Commission. He noted that the encroachment was only at a small notch near the center of the proposed expansion. Grittman noted that the home sat on an angle to the lot line. He also discussed the proposed lower level in detail, noting that a one stall garage would be included and a walled off storage space accessible by a service door. Walling off the two spaces maintains the requirement for maximum garage space to be under 1,200 square feet. Grittman reviewed the variance criteria for approval of an application. The applicant suggested that the steep slope in grade from west to east inhibits the ability to construct an expansion in a number of ways. Another aspect that complicates access and construction is the shared driveway. It was noted that access to the lower level is limited and there currently is no garage for the property. Grittman explained that the revised survey submitted shows an impervious surface coverage of 24.9 percent including a 9 foot driveway breaking from the driveway to the upper level. Staff would continue to work with the applicant to ensure there is less than 25 percent impervious surface coverage. This is also noted as important by the DNR and they commented they were not concerned with the side yard setback request. Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 Page 5 � 9 Staff recommended approval of the variance, but noted that it would be possible to build an expansion without encroaching in the setback area. Grittman noted that the variance criteria has changed to considering if the proposal is a reasonable use of property rather than if it is capable of ineeting code. Grittman also stated that the average setback of the proposed project is consistent with the code. The small corner of the proposed living space is the only area that is encroaching. The structure meets the side yard setback from the front proposed garage space and also meets the setback for the rear portion of the addition. Paul Konsor asked for clarification if the impervious surface totaled 24.9 percent. Grittman stated that the most updated survey indicated that amount. Konsor noted that the DNR mentioned that the total impervious surface coverage in the MWSRR should not exceed 20 percent and the City requires less than 25 percent. Grittman explained that the 25 percent was written into the code and it was believed the DNR misquoted the code in their response. Konsor asked how the DNR communicates to the City on applications. Grittman explained that they did respond via email confirming they were acceptable of the project moving forward. They did not receive the revised survey. Konsor asked if removing the existing shed would help lower the impervious surface on the lot. Schumann stated that the existing shed is 95 feet, but the impervious calculation includes a wood deck which is typically considered pervious. Staff would need to look closer at these numbers as they likely hover between 20 and 25 percent total impervious. Konsor also asked if gravel is considered impervious surface. Grittman confirmed that gravel is considered impervious and noted staff should confirm with the surveyor to understand what was measured as impervious. It was noted that the shed was counted towards the impervious surface coverage. Charlotte Gabler has a question regarding tree preservation on the site. Schumann noted the ordinance does apply, but the trees on site do not meet the protection ordinance. Schumann noted that staff would verify, but it was thought that properties in the MWSRR have tree protection ordinances in addition and staff will verify. Grittman added that the updated survey showed that three oak trees at 18 (x2) and 22 inches were being removed. Sam Murdoff opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to speak first. Chris Holtz, the applicant, stated that the surveyor did include the existing gravel driveway as impervious surface area. Holtz noted that in meetings with staff, he explained that it could be removed and replaced with additional lawn space, but that the proposal still meet the 25 percent impervious surface maximum. His plan was to remove a portion of the gravel driveway, the chain link fence, shrubs, and small trees to make a larger front yard, which would lower the impervious surface coverage. The applicant noted that he cannot remove the shed as he will be using it as a dog house. He added that the proposed storage in the lower level addition would be used for the items stored currently in the shed. Murdoff clarified that the applicant was going to remove part of the existing driveway. Holtz confirmed that gravel would be removed and that an apron would probably be installed to the lower level for easy access to yard equipment. Holtz Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 Page 6 � 9 explained that the proposed addition would clean up the whole front end of the house and property. Charlotte Gabler expressed her excitement for the project and asked if the applicant was saw the requirements of the conditions of approval in Exhibit Z. Holtz confirmed. Andrew Tapper asked if the applicant was able to discuss his plans with his neighbors, especially to the west. Holtz declined, but noticed that the western property was fenced and should not be an eye-sore. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Murdoff expressed his appreciation for the project, but noted the high amount of variances that have been received for MWSRR. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PG2020-020 APPROVING THE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE HOLTZ HOME ADDITION AT 305 RIVERVIEW DRIVE, BASED ON FINDINGS 1N SAID RESOLUTION, AND PURSUANT TO THE CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED 1N EXHIBIT Z. ALISON ZIMPFER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Holtz Side Yard Setback Variance 305 Riverview Drive Legal: Lot 2, Manhattan Lots 1. The applicant verifies the final setback encroachment by survey, consistent with the assumptions made in this report. 2. The applicant verifies by survey compliance with the maximum impervious surface requirements of the MWSRR ordinance. 3. The applicant verifies the e�terior materials to be used are consistent with the materials used on the existing principal structure. 4. The applicant's final plans retain a maximum of 1,200 square feet of garage space as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance. 5. The existing shed is converted to non-storage purposes to maintain compliance with the accessory building regulations. 6. Incorporation of the City Engineer's comments as noted in this report. 7. Comments and recommendations of other staff or Planning Commission. Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 Page 7 � 9 C. Public Hearin� — Consideration of a request for an Amendment to Monticello Zonin� Ordinance to Chapter 3.6, Industrial Base Zonin� Districts, related to maximum hei�ht of a structure. Applicant: Citv of Monticello Steve Grittman reminded the Planning Commission that they recently reviewed a proposed CUP to the height of a structure in an industrial district. The current code limits industrial building height to 30 feet. Grittman noted that the City has received other requests at a staff level, where taller industrial buildings are desired. Grittman noted that dragging people through the CUP process for what has become the standard for industrial building seemed to be excessive. When the City updated its Zoning Ordinance several years ago, it was noted that one of the objectives was to minimize the number of CUPs. The proposed amendment would allow industrial buildings to be constructed at 45 feet, with a CUP for larger structures. Grittman provided a survey of height requirements of industrial buildings in neighboring communities. Staff believed that the 45 foot height would accommodate requests for building height in the industrial district. Staff also ran the request by the Fire Department to ensure there would be no issues with the additional height. They expressed satisfaction with the code increase as proposed. Grittman provided conte�t of other buildings in the City. Staff recommended approval of the request. Sam Murdoff asked why other communities have different height maximum requirements for different industrial districts. Grittman was unsure, but it would be possible that they may have existing structures that tall given the city. Paul Konsor asked if a property was located in the MWSRR would they be restricted by the height requirement of that district. Grittman confirmed. Charlotte Gabler asked if the height increase would help businesses, notably in Otter Creek, from having additional indoor storage space. It was noted the high expense of expanding, but not a large impact would likely exist, but it could help limit outdoor storage. Andrew Tapper asked if the amendment would impact any current CUPs. Grittman explained that it e�tinguishes the need for a CUP for an existing 45 foot structure. The CUPs run with the land, but no longer are relevant to the site. Tapper also recognized an inconsistency with the staff report and the draft ordinance regarding industrial buildings with CUP's shadow casting on residential structures. Grittman confirmed that it was intent to remove that section due to the 200 foot buffer requirement. A building of 45 feet or under with a 200 foot buffer would not cast a shadow that far regardless. Grittman stated that a building would have to be larger than an estimated 90 feet (and seek a CUP) for a Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 Page 8 � 9 shadow to be present. A CUP would be required for buildings taller than 45 feet and there would be discretion on the request. Sam Murdoff opened the public hearing. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed. SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION PG2020-021 TO RECONIN�ND APPROVAL OF AN UPDATE TO THE CITY' S ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A BUILDING HEIGHT OF 45 FEET AND FOUR STORIES 1N THE 1NDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, WITH NO CHANGE TO THE ALLOWANCE FOR GREATER HEIGHT BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of the Communitv Development Director's Report Angela Schumann provided the Community Development Director's Report. Schumann confirmed with the Housing Study consultant that the scope would cover affordable housing in all levels and look at comparable cities. Schumann encouraged the Planning Commission to participate in the survey available on the City's website. The study and engagement will be completed by MSA Professionals. 4. Added Items None. 5. Adjournment PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:36 P.M ALISON ZIMPFER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARR�D, 4-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander Approved: August 4th, 2020 Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 Page 9 � 9 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, July 7th, 2020 — 4:30 p.m. North Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Council Members Present: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Lloyd Hilgart, and Charlotte Gabler Council Members Absent: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Commissioners Present: Sam Murdoff, Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, and Alison Zimpfer Commissioners Absent: John Alstad Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order Acting Mayor Lloyd Hilgart called the Joint Meeting of the Monticello City Council and Planning Commission to order at 4:30 p.m. 2. Regular Agenda A. Concept Sta�e Planned Unit Development proposal for a 53-unit multifamilv housin� development. Applicant: Duffv Development Companv, Inc Steve Grittman explained that a land use submittal was received for Duffy Development Company, Minnetonka, for a Concept Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) to construct a 53-unit affordable workforce housing project along 7th Street and Elm Street. Grittman noted that the applicant was seeking preliminary comments on their concept design to assist them during a competitive application process through the State's low income tax credit program. Grittman also stated that the applicant was seeking three flexibilities from the base zoning code, which included a reduction in front setback, reduction in parking count, and relaxation in minimum unit square footage size. It was noted that if their application to the State was successful, they would return for land use consideration in 2021. Grittman explained that the parcel is currently zoned B-3 (Highway Business District) and would need to be rezoned to R-4 as the base zoning code for the PUD District. A mix of unit counts from one to three bedrooms would be proposed along with surface and underground parking. It was remarked that other land use application considerations would be required in the future including Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and Preliminary and Final Plat. City Council & Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 (Joint Meeting) Page 1 � 3 Grittman reviewed staff's preliminary comments and issues as it related to land use, parking and circulation, building height and architecture, site planning, connectivity and open space, landscaping and buffering, civil site design, and board review. Jeff Von Feldt, applicant from Duffy Development, introduced himself and provided an overview of the project. Von Feldt noted that they own and manage a variety of Housing Tax Credit properties in the Twin Cities area. Their closest developments are in Big Lake, Elk River, Maple Grove, and Minnetonka. Von Feldt reviewed the Housing Tax Credit Program in detail. He explained that a funding gap existed with the project and that they would seek City assistance in the form of TIF, and financial commitment from the city in the form of PUD flexibility from zoning ordinance requirements. He also explained the unit types proposed, noting that all of the units would offer universal design, and that the project would include housing for transitional long term homeless. Council member Lloyd Hilgart expressed concern regarding the timing of the project. He noted that the city is currently undertaking a housing study, which will be important to understanding needs in various segments of the market. He noted that as particularly important given the influx of multi-family that has been approved or constructed within last year. Council member Hilgart also noted that he has some concern with the project location, noting that the remnant commercial parcel may not be a truly viable parcel for commercial. Planning Commissioner Paul Konsor reviewed statements within the housing study, noting the need for addition single-family housing and concern whether this housing type was needed at this time. Council member Gabler inquired as to the funding mix proposed, including the use of tax increment financing. Mr. Von Feldt clarified that the TIF would satisfy one component of the project scoring, with the PUD flexibility satisfying a separate scoring component. The city could choose to provide additional funding, but Duffy is requesting the PUD flexibility at this time as the financial commitment for that specific component. Commissioner Gabler stated some concern with the timing of the proposal. Planning Commission Chair Sam Murdoff noted that he was generally supportive of the location as a transition location for housing between the residential in the area and the commercial east along 7th Street. He did note that for families, he would be inclined to have the unit sizes closer to the 900 square foot requirement. 3. Adjournment Recorder: Angela Schumann Approved: August 4th, 2020 City Council & Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 (Joint Meeting) Page 2 � 3 Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director City Council & Planning Commission Minutes — July 7th, 2020 (Joint Meeting) Page 3 � 3 Plaiuung Commission Agenda 08/04/2020 2A. Public Hearin� — Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zonin� Ordinance related to accessorv buildin� materials, window si�n permittin�, and manufactured homes and parks. Applicant: Citv of Monticella (NAC) Property: Planning Case Number: Legal: NA Address: NA 2020-021 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: ANALYSIS Amendments to Zoning Ordinance NA NA � Over the past several months, there have been projects and research related to various aspects of the zoning ordinance, through which the Community Development Department has discovered language that should be modified to better reflect the City's requirements, and/or, better direct ordinance users to the proper and complete information. There are three such amendments being proposed by staf£ (1) An amendment to the Accessory Buildings — Major section of the code (Section 5.3). This section provides a list of conditions that are referenced from the Accessory Building use table which are applied to accessory buildings. Readers of this section of the code could infer that no other standards apply to such building, however, the building materials section of the ordinance includes a specific requirement for such buildings. This amendment adds a reference to that section (Section 4.11) to highlight those additional requirements. This change does not alter any standards of the ordinance. The proposed language would read as follows: Section 5.3 D)(2)(a) (iii) Accessory Buildin�s, Major, shall be rec�uired to meet the buildin� materials standards as found in Cha�ter 4. ll C� as a�licable. Plaiuung Commission Agenda 08/04/2020 (2) An amendment to the Sign Ordinance section of the zoning ordinance which currently exempts any window signage from a permitting requirement. While most signs require permits from the City to ensure consistency with applicable standards, window signs were exempted from that standard when the sign ordinance was last updated, since the City did not count them against any zoning ordinance limitation. Businesses are free to fill their window spaces with signage without concern over maximum allowable sign area or other regulation. However, when the city's Downtown Small Area Plan was adopted, a series of regulatory additions were adopted as a part of that Plan. One of these was a set of restrictions to window treatments and signage in the downtown (CCD) zoning district. While the proposed language does not change the exemption that window signs get from the maximum area requirement, such signs would now require a permit to ensure that they meet the guidelines identified in the Small Area Plan, as exemplified by this clause: Visual Identity Many successful retail streets have recognizable visual themes that make them memorable and vivid. Th e buildings in downtown Monticello vary greatly in style, size and condition. Treatments of windows, signage and displays varies greatly as well. Patterns that establish a sense of identity are lacking. Strategy recommendation • Businesses on Broadway Street could agr�ee to use signage improvements as an initial vehicle for improving the perceived condition of the district, and presenting some common visual elements (color, pattern, shape, creativity, etc) that build a sense of identity The proposed language would read as follows: Section 4.5 (H) (15) Window Signs. Window signs are not considered a part of the maximum sign area otherwise allowed under Section 4.5 of this ordinance. Window si�ns in the CCD zonin� district shall rec�uire a�ermit, and shall com�lv with the rec�uirements of the Monticello Downtown Plan. Window si�ns in other zonin� districts � do not require a permit. (3) The third topic relates to Manufactured Homes, and upon review, the ordinance's tendency to discuss Manufactured Homes (the actual units) with Manufactured Home Parks (those developments that provide individual home site specifically for Manufactured Homes). A manufactured home is a construction style — the City cannot prohibit such a home in any district where it would allow typical construction methods, or "site-built" homes, provided the manufactured 2 Plaiuung Commission Agenda 08/04/2020 home meets all of the applicable zoning regulations that apply to the site built structure. Therefore, if the manufactured home includes the Zoning district's minimum width and size requirements, requisite masonry material on the fa�ade, the required roof pitch, and the minimum materials standards (for example), the City must permit the manufactured home to be located on the subject property. Manufactured Home Parks, on the other hand, are a land use that are specifically built to provide sites for manufactured homes. This use has a series of standards for development, including a specific zoning district under which the park can be created. The standards in the sections of the ordinance referring to Manufactured Home Parks should be distinct from any general reference to individual manufactured homes. Thus, two specific citations in the ordinance are being amended to clear up that confusion, both of which would be left to refer to manufactured home parks only. The proposed language would read as follows: Section 3.7 (I)(1)(b) By permitting a combination of housing types and styles, including single family, two-family, and multiple family dwellings, with the exception of manufactured home parks; and Table 5-1, Uses by District Mobile & Manufactured � Home Park As discussed, these amendments are primarily housekeeping changes to add clarity and better represent the Comprehensive Plan direction and common practice. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC-2020-022, recommending approval of Ordinance No. X, amending the zoning ordinance as noted, based on the findings in the resolution. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. PC-2020-022, based on findings to be identified following the public hearing. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution, pending additional information from staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Plaiuung Commission Agenda 08/04/2020 Staff recommends Alternative 1. These are minor amendments which add clarification to the ordinance requirements. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2020-022 B. Draft Ordinance No. X C. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-022 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED TO ACCESSORY BUILDING MATERIALS, WINDOW SIGN PERMITTING, AND MANUFACTURED HOMES AND PARKS WHEREAS, City staff has identified zoning ordinance language that raises concerns over clarity and applicability related to accessory building materials, window sign permitting, and manufactured homes and parks; and WHEREAS, City staff has proposed a series of amendments to the zoning ordinance intended to address those concerns; and WHEREAS, the amendments would add to the readability of the subject ordinance sections, increase conformity with the intent of the zoning ordinance generally, and eliminate inapplicable language; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 4th, 2020 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The Zoning Ordinance amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering both the intent and the specific goals and policies for land use in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendments eliminate concerns over applicability and imprecise language. 3. The ordinance incorporates applicable provisions of State law and regulation regarding such uses, thus providing a protection for the public and for the operators of such facilities. 4. The proposed amendment is expected to have no negative impacts on municipal public services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-022 Monticello City Council approves the Zoning Ordinance amendment, based on the findings listed above. ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 2020, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMIV�SSION : ATTEST: Sam Murdoff, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 5.3 SECTION (D) (ACCESSORY BUII,DING MATERIALS); CHAPTER 4.5, SECTION (H) (WINDOW SIGN PERMITTING); TABLE 5-1 (USES BY DISTRICT; AND CHAPTER 3.7, SECTION (�, (MANUFACTURED HOMES AND HOME PARKS), THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 5.3 (D)(2)(a) — Accessory Buildings Major, is hereby amended to add the following: (iii) Accessorv Buildin�s, Major, shall be required to meet the buildin� materials standards as found in Chapter 4.11 C) as a�licable. Section 2. Section 4.5 (H) (15) is hereby amended to read as follows: (15) Window Signs. Window signs are not considered a part of the maximum sign area otherwise allowed under Section 4.5 of this ordinance. Window si'e� the CCD zonin� district shall rec�uire a�ermit, and shall com�lv with the rec�uirements of the Monticello Downtown Plan. Window si�ns in other zoning districts � do not require a permit. Section 3. Section 3.7 (I)(1)(b) is hereby amended to read as follows: (b) By permitting a combination of housing types and styles, including single family, two-family, and multiple family dwellings, with the exception of manufactured home parks; Section 4. Table 5-1, Uses by District, Residential Uses shall be amended as follows: Mobile & Manufactured � Home Park Section 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, Section 6 ATTEST: � provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. � Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, Administrator � AYES: NAYS: � �� : �i�rss�f�� s��r��s Section 4. I I Building Materials Subsection (C) Residential District Requirements (2) New materials In recognition of the ever-changing marketplace for new finishing materials, the Community Development Department may authorize the use of materials not listed herein if it is determined that such a material is substantially similar or superior to one or more of the approved building materials. (C) Residential District Requirements (1) All Residence Districts No metal siding shall be permitted wider than 12 inches or without a one-half (1/2) inch ar more overlap and relief. (2) R-1 and R-2 Districts A minimum of 15% of the front building fa�ade of any structure in the R-1 or R-2 Districts, less the square footage area of the garage doors, shall be covered with brick or stone. Any attached or major detached accessory building that can be seen from the street shall meet this same standard. Structures with front facades covered by at least 70% stucco or real wood may reduce the brick or stone coverage to 5%. The Community Development Department may approve optional facade treatments when additional architectural detailing so warrants. Such detailing may include usable front porches, e�traordinary roof pitch or other features. (3) R-A and T-N Districts A minimum of 20% of the front building fa�ade of any structure in the R-A or T- N zoning district, less the square footage area of the garage doors, shall be covered with brick or stone. Any attached or major detached accessory building that can be seen from the street shall meet this same standard. Structures with front facades covered by at least 70% stucco or real wood may reduce the brick or stone coverage to 10%. (4) R-3 District and other Districts with Multiple Family Housing A R-3 District and other districts with multiple family housing shall be subject to building material standards as follows: all building walls facing a public street shall be covered with stone, brick, cultured masonry simulating brick or stone, or other enhanced materials acceptable to the City Council to an e�tent not less than 20% of the exposed wall silhouette area. In addition, multiple family structures of thirteen (13) or more units shall, when lap horizontal siding, be constructed of heavy gauge steel or cement-board, with no use of vinyl or aluminum permitted. �i�y �t �vior��eeiio �aning t�r�trr��r�4 �:;� r3�g� .�.3.� �f�� 4: Ff�ifs��i� s7"��i�� Section 4. I I Building Materials Subsection (D) Business District Requirement� Natural wood or species that is resistant to decay may be permitted where approved by the City Council. (5) Roofing Materials Roofing materials in residential districts, including for principal and accessory buildings, shall consist of shingles made of asphalt, fiberglass, durable rot- resistant wood (such as cedar), stone (such as slate) or architectural metal (including steel and copper). Heavy gauge steel or copper may be used for standing-seam roofing. Steel may be used only when designed to resemble traditional residential architectural roofing materials. (D) Business District Requirements In all Business Zoning Districts (see table 3-1), the following building materials standards shall apply. (1) No galvanized or unfinished steel, galvalum, or unfinished aluminum buildings, except those specifically designed to have a corrosive designed finish such as"corten" steel, shall be permitted in the districts listed herein. (2) Buildings in these zoning districts shall maintain a high standard of architectural and aesthetic compatibility with conforming surrounding properties to ensure that they will not adversely impact the property values of the abutting properties and shall have a positive impact on the public health, safety, and general welfare, insofar as practicable. (3) E�erior building finishes in the districts subject to this Section shall consist of materials compatible in grade and quality to the following: (a) Brick (b) Natural Stone (c) Decorative rock face or concrete block (d) Cast-in-place concrete or pre-cast concrete panels (e) Wood, provided that the surfaces are finished for exterior use and wood of proven e�terior durability is used, such as cedar, redwood, or cypress (t� Glass (g) Exterior Insulated Finish systems, where said system is manufactured to replicate the look of one of the approved building materials in this section (h) Stucco i�� s.�� ;�Ft� �t iYie;nticeif� �onrr�g �raincrnte CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table o f Permitted Accessory Uses (3) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures • • • � .- . � -. �.. . . . . -. -. • . -. minorsory Building — P P P P P p p p p p P P P P P P 5.3 D I ( 1( 1 majorsory Building — P P P P p p p C p P P P P P P P 5.3(D1(21 Adult Use — accessory C 5.3(Dl(31 Agricultural Buildings p 5,3(D1(41 Air Conditioning Units P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.�� Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) P P P P P P P P 5.3(Dl(51 Automobile Repair — Major C 5.3(Dl(6l Automobile Repair — Minor C C 5.3(Dl(7l Boarder(s) p p p 5,3(D1(81 Bulk Fuel Sales/Storage p p p C C C 5.3(D1(91 Cocktail Room (Retail Sales Accessory to Micro- C C C C C C Distillery) 5.3(�( I 0� Co-located Wireless Telecommunications C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Antennae 4.13(E1 Columbarium (Accessory P P P P P P P use to Cemeteries) 5.3(�( I I� Commercial Canopies P P P P P P P P 5.3(D�(12� Commercial Transmission/ Reception Antennae/ C C C C C C Structures 4. I�D� Donation Drop-off Containers P P 5.3(D�(13� Drive-Through Services P P P C P P P 5.3(�(14� EntertainmentlRecreation C C C C 5.3(�(15� — Outdoor Commercial Fences or Walls p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p 4.3 Greenhouse/Conservatory P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p 5.3(D�(16� (non-commercial) Heliports C C C C C 5.3(D�(17� Home Occupations p p p p p p p p p p 5.3(D�(18� Indoor Food / p p p p p p p p 5.3(D�(19� Convenience Sales Pa�e 4 I� �f�y �f'll�ontieeffo Zonrng Ordincrnee eF7APTER S: USE STA�lDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Speci fic Standards for Certain Accessory Us�,�, (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessorv Uses (1) Accessory Building — Minor (a) Minor accessory buildings do not require a building permit, but shall comply with all applicable zoning regulations. (b) In the M-H district, one minor accessory building for storage of equipment and refuse is permitted for each manufactured home provided the accessory building can meet all required setbacks, and is designed of weather resistant material that will enhance the general appearance of the lot. (2) Accessory Building — Major (a) In all residential districts except M-H, the following shall apply: (i) Size i�� i � �;�Ft� �t iYie;nticeif� �onrr�g �raincrnte Cl��'i`�� : i15� Si��fi��t�C35 Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards S�absection (D) Additional Speci fic Standards for Certain Accessory Uses 1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: a. 1,200 square feet; or b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. 2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a ma�mum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: a. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. b. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. c. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. d. The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. (ii) Private Garages 1. Private garages shall be used by the family or families residing upon the premises, except as follows: a. One-half of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if sufficient off-street parking in full compliance with this ordinance is provided elsewhere on the property. b. All of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if the available garage space does not exceed two spaces. 2. No business, service, or industry shall be carried on within a private garage; 3. Private garages shall not be used for the storage of more than one (1) commercial vehicle owned or operated by a resident per dwelling unit. �r�r at �viorr�ceiio �aning t�r�t�r��r�4 �::� r3�g� �,r i � ��P�� : 115� S°1`.�P�fCi��i�S Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Speci fic Standards for Certain Accessory Us�,�, (b) In the M-H district, the following shall apply: (i)Accessory storage buildings in manufactured home parks, if not reviewed and approved as part of a PUD, shall be conditionally permitted subject to the following additional requirements: 1. The storage building and any accompanying outdoor storage area shall be for the sole use of the residents of the manufactured home park and shall not be used by non-residents. 2. Accompanying outdoor storage areas shall be fully screened from surrounding manufactured home units and adjacent properties. (c) In all business and industrial districts, commercial or business buildings and structures for a use accessory to the principal use is permitted provided that: (i) In all districts except I-2, such use sha11 not exceed thiriy (30) percent of the gross floor space of the principal use. (ii) In the I-2 district, such use shall not exceed forty (40) percent of the gross floor space of the principal use. (3) Adult Use/Accessory Activities provided that: (a) Activities classified as obscene as defined by Minnesota Statute 617241 are �Statute 617.241 not permitted and are prohibited. (b) An adult use which does not qualify as an accessory use shall be classif�ied as an adult use/principal. (c) Adult use/accessory activities shall be prohibited from locating in any building which is also utilized for residential purposes. (d) Adult use/accessory activities shall comprise no more than ten (10) percent of the floor area of the establishment in which it is located or shall comprise an area no greater than 100 sq ft of floor area in which it is located, whichever is smaller. (e) Adult use/accessory activities shall be restricted and prohibited from access to minors by the physical separation of such items from areas of general public access: (i) Movie Rentals. Display areas shall be restricted from general view and shall be located within a separate room, the access of which is in clear view and under the control of the persons responsible for the operation. (ii) Magazines. Publications classif�ied or qualifying as adult uses shall be covered with a wrapper or other means to prevent display of any material other than the publication title. r°a�� t� c�� viont�ceil- Cvrring tJrc�rr�crr�ee ��P�`�� 2: .4�PtlC��d�t�� ;��5�� Section 2.4 Specific Revi��t� � r��;�� Po �� ,s� �,r=� r.f�, Subsection (J) Sign Permr�� (� Sign Permits (1) Purpose and Scope This subsection sets out the procedures to follow when requesting a sign permit. (2) Initiation of Proceedings A request for a Sign Permit shall be initiated by application of the property owner or other person having authority to file an application pursuant to Section 23(B), Authority to File Applications. (3) Application (a) All applications for a Sign Permit shall be in accordance with Section 23, Common Review Requirements. (b) In addition to general review requirements, applications for a Sign Permit shall also include at least the following to be considered complete (except as exempted by the Community Development Department): (i) Names and addresses ofthe applicant, owners ofthe sign and lot. (ii) The address(es) at which the sign(s) are to be erected. (iii) The lot, block and addition at which the signs are to be erected and the street on which they are to front. (iv) Type and size of sign (e.g., wall sign, pylon sign). (v) A site plan (or survey if required by the Community Development Department) which is to scale showing the location of lot lines, building structures, parking areas, existing and proposed signs and any other physical features. (vi) Plans, location and specifications and method of construction and attachment to the buildings or placement method on the ground. (vii) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing that the structure is designed for dead load and wind pressure in any direction in the amount required by this and all other laws and ordinances of the City, if required. (viii) Written consent of the owner or lessee of any site on which the sign is to be erected. (ix) Any electrical permit required and issued for the sign. (x) A detailed description of any electronic or electrical components that are proposed to be added to the sign. SIGN PERMIT � Section 2.4(H) All sig�2 requirements can be found in Section 4.5: Si�ns Section 2.3: Common Review Requirements r'�� - �;�f�� €�� Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te �`��"�� s ��1��;��;� ��g� �i�viL3 t��Ei}i1�E5 � :.,'i�� <_ ti� '�' � e"� ,�_ �,« � :��:edures & Requirements ��.rbsection (J) Sign Permits (xi) If the proposed sign is a sandwich board sign to be located in the CCD District, the owner of the sign shall provide a certificate of general liability insurance with minimum coverage of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00) naming the City as an additional insured for the sign to be located upon the public right-of-way within the CCD, Central Community District. (xii) Other information to demonstrate compliance with this and all other ordinances of the City. (4) Review (a) Sign Review Criteria Approval of a Sign Permit application shall be based on the following criteria: (i) Whether the proposed sign is consistent with all the requirements of this ordinance and any other City Code requirements; (ii) Whether the proposed sign is in compliance with the applicable zoning district and overlay district regulations; and (iii) Whether the proposed sign meets all the requirements or conditions of any applicable development approvals or agreements. (b) Sign Review Process (i) The Community Development Department will review all sign permit requests. (ii) Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(K)(4)(a) shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. (iii) Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(K)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. (5) Reasonable Conditions In approving a sign permit, the Community Development Department may impose such reasonable conditions and requirements as it deems necessary and appropriate to ensure continued compliance with a sign permit review criteria. �i�y �t �vior��eeiio �aning t�r�trr��r�4 �:;� `',�� 'r` CN�PT��2 2: .��PtIC�iT1t�lii �� F��t�+��S Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedur� ��ro �� r� ��r�� re� Subsection (K) Temporary Use Perms�� (6) Effect of a Sign Permit Approval ��) �g) (a) The issuance of a Sign Permit shall authorize only the installation or replacement of signage approved by the Community Development Department. (b) A Sign Permit, including any conditions, shall run with the land and shall not be affected by a change in ownership. Time Limit (a) Failure to install the approved signage within six months of the date of approval will invalidate the permit. (b) Upon written request, one extension of six months may be granted by the Community Development Department ifthe applicant can show good cause. Amendments All requested amendments to an existing sign permit shall be processed in the same manner as a new application. (9) Appeal The applicant for a Sign Permit may appeal the decision of the Community Development Department to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals per Section 2.4(H). (I� Temporary Use Permits (1) Purpose and Scope This subsection sets out the procedures to follow when requesting a Temporary Use permit. (2) Initiation of Proceedings A request for a Temporary Use Permit shall be initiated by application of the property owner or other person having authority to file an application pursuant to Section 23(B), Authority to File Applications. (3) Application (a) All applications for a Temporary Use Permit shall be in accordance with Section 2.3, Common Review Requirements. TEMPORARY USE PERMIT Decisitt� Section 2.4(H) Page 4=�' City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance ��`�� : ��i��i'�� i�1��1��5 ��ction 3.5 Business Base Zoning Districts ��.absection (� Central Community District Buildin�s adjacent to sin�le family. Building side walls adjacent to single family residentially zoned properties, or directly across a public street from such properties, shall have side wall heights of no greater than the horizontal distance to the nearest single-family structure. Buildings abutting single family residentially zoned properties shall have roofs sloping toward the abutting single family use, or shall employ at least one ofthe transitional features in Section 4.7 of this ordinance. f. Buildin� materials. Building materials for all uses shall be predominantly glass, brick, natural or cultured stone, or equivalent masonry materiaL Materials for lapped siding, board-and-batten, or shake exteriors shall be composite, maintenance free materials, and shall be limited in overall exterior use to: o Residential structures, no more than 30 percent of building exterior. o Commercial and other structures, no more than 15 percent of building exterior may be comprised of architectural metal, which shall be integrated into the building design. o Mixed use buildings shall comply with the commercial building requirements. 3. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS a. CharacterAreaStandards i. Broadwav • All buildings should have a storefront or entrance on Broadway. Buildings shall be oriented toward the front of the lot, with a maximum 10' setback. Setbacks may be increased to accommodate outdoor seating or activity spaces approved by Planning Commission during site plan review. Such spaces shall be improved with enhanced paving and landscaping materials and other elements. Storefronts facing any public street shall consist of a minimum of 50% window/door transparency on ground floor. Buildings shall be between 2-4 stories, additional stories may be authorized by conditional use permit. Single-story buildings may be approved through site plan review by the Planning Commission and City Council where multiple stories are impractical for the specific use. In such cases, the building architecture should incorporate a fa�ade that mimics multiple stories through additional window openings or similar features. Buildings shall have a maximum width of 60 feet, or shall be articulated by setback, materials or window treatments roofline variation, or other design methods to reflect the appearance of separate buildings, in approximately 30- 60' increments. �i�y o� �Von�eeiio �aning �r�trr��r�4 .� 6s�ge f i 'i` ��P�� 3: �C3►�iiP�t� �1S°1`�i�iS Section 3.5 Business Base Zoning Districts Subsection (� Central Community District Ground floor commercial buildings which front on public streets or open space shall not be entirely comprised of office uses, but shall include other retail, hospitality or entertainment uses. • Sidewalks and/or pathway connections shall be provided for all development projects. ii. Walnut/Cedar • Features such as upper balconies, dormers, courtyards, porches and dooryards shall be incorporated for residential uses. Buildings shall be between 2- 4 stories; additional stories may be authorized by conditional use permit. Single-story buildings may be approved through site plan review by the Planning Commission and the City Council where multiple stories are impractical for the specific use. In such cases, the building architecture should incorporate a fa�ade that mimics multiple stories through additional window openings or similar features. Buildings shall be oriented toward Walnut and Cedar Street and toward front corners where applicable. iii. Pine Street • Buildings shall be between 2-4 stories; additional stories may be authorized by conditional use permit. Single-story buildings may be approved through site plan review by the Planning Commission and the City Council where multiple stories are impractical for the specific use. In such cases, the building architecture should incorporate a fa�ade that mimics multiple stories through additional window openings or similar features. • Buildings shall be oriented to Pine Street with secondary entrances located on side or interior facades. Corner properties shall have dual orientation. b. Use Tvpe Standards i. Residential • Single/Two Family: Where permitted, the requirements of the R-2 District will apply. • Townhouse o Permitted where the subject property has no direct frontage on Broadway or Wa1nuUCedar. o Must preserve open space to coordinate with public spaces. o Building heights up to 25 feet or 2 stories above grade. o Setbacks — 15 feet from abutting single family, minimum of 8 feet from public street. Interior side setbacks may be zero. o Variable roofline and front building walls. i�� i i � �;�Ft� �t iYie;nticeif� �onrr�g �raincrnte �`�:��""�� w �ti�F��-lii�� i°��5 Section 4.5 Signs Subsection (H) General Provisions (12) Height The top of a wall sign, including its superstructure, if any, shall be no higher than the roof of the building to which such sign may be attached. (13) Landscaping A site plan shall be submitted as a part of any application for a freestanding sign which includes plans for the landscaping of the area near the sign, and which demonstrates that the sign will complement the existing or proposed general site landscaping of the property. (14) Vehicle Fuel Facilities Signs for vehicle fuel facilities shall be regulated by the sign provisions for the zoning district in which the facility is located, except that within a freestanding sign, an area not to exceed si�teen (16) square feet shall be allowed for continuous display (no flashing, scrolling or other animation) of electronic or non-electronic changeable copy identifying current fuel prices in accordance with Minnesota state statutes section 239.751. (15) Window Signs Window signs are not considered a part of the maximum sign area otherwise allowed under Section 4.5 of this ordinance and do not require a permit. (16) Changeable Copy Signs (a) Changeable copy signs are subject to the following additional regulations: (i) Signs must be permanently anchored to the structure. (ii) Signs must be incorporated within the overall sign structure for both monument and pylon signs and must be consistent in design with the sign structure. (b) Within commercial and industrial districts and for civic and institutional uses including, but not limited to, public school facilities, hospital and medical facilities, municipal facilities and places of public assembly, one (1) changeable copy sign shall be allowed per site provided that the area of the sign not exceed twenty-five (25) percent ofthe allowable sign area or fifty (50) square feet, whichever is less, for a freestanding or wall sign. The area of this sign shall be counted against the maximum sign area for the building, except where the property owner has agreed to forgo the use of temporary signs in accordance Section 4.5(I)(2) in which case the area ofthe changeable copy sign shall be allowed in excess of the maximum sign area. �r�r at �vior��rceiio �aning t�r�t�r�c�r�4 �::� r3�g� � 1 � ��t��-�� : zc��r�� is��i��-s Section 3J Overlay Zoning Districts ��bsection (1) Per formance Based Enhancement District (4) LED Illumination Section 4.S�II)�7): In the Freeway Bonus Sign District, unshielded LED (Light Emitting Diode) Illuminated Si�ns illumination may be used pursuantto the regulations found in Section 4S(H)(7). (H) DW: Drinkin� Water Supplv Mana�ement Area RESERVED (I) Performance Based Enhancement District (1) Purpose The purpose of the Performance Based Enhancement Overlay District is to provide for by-right development flexibility and enhancement in exchange for meeting special design controls and/or protecting sensitive natural features. The district is intended to create a reasonable balance between the interests of a property owner seeking more development options on a property and the interests of the surrounding property owners in the following ways: (a) By encouraging a more creative approach in commercial and housing developments that will result in quality living environments through innovative design and aesthetic controls; (b) By permitting a combination of housing types and styles, including single family, two-family, and multiple family dwellings, with the exception of manufactured homes; (c) By allowing flexibility in design by permitting cluster developments and a variety of architectural styles and treatments; (d) By allowing flexibility in setback and height restrictions; (e) By providing an eff�icient use of land resulting in more cost eff�icient installation of utilities, streets, and other facilities; (f) By encouraging the preservation of common open space, recreational facilities, natural features such as woodland, wetland, and flood plain; (g) By contributing to the tax base of the community without making undue demands on the community services; (h) By providing the means for greater fle�bility in environmental design than is provided under the strict application of the Monticello zoning ordinance and �i�y o� ��on�eelio �aning �r�trr��r�4.� 6s�ge 1�S'i` ��P�� 3: �C3►�iiP�t� C31S°1`�1�iS Section 3J Overlay Zoning Districts Subsection (1) Performance Based Enhancement Distr�� subdivision ordinance while at the same time preserving general welfare of the City of Monticello and its inhabitants. (2) District Application The provisions of Section 3.7(I) shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Monticello that are denoted on the official zoning map as being within the performance based enhancement overlay district. (3) Relation to Underlying Zoning District The performance based enhancement district provides different opportunities based on the underlying zoning district as follows: (a) R-1 and R-2 Base Zoning Districts Properties with a base zoning district classification of R-1 or R-2 within the performance based enhancement district can provide a harmonious mixture of different residential land use types to best utilize the development potential of the land given the natural environment and existing/future adjacent land uses. (i) Uses in general Uses shall be governed by the regulations for the R-2 zoning district as outlined in Tables 5-1, 5=4 and 5=6. (ii) Allowed Density 1. The base density shall be governed by the regulations for the underlying zoning district. 2. Adjustments to the allowed base density shall be permitted in accordance with the provisions of the performance based enhancement district, but in no case shall the maximum density of the underlying zoning district be exceeded. 3. Allowed percentage reductions to base density requirements shall always be calculated off the standard base density for the underlying zoning district, with the sum of all allowed reductions being used to calculate the final allowed density. (iii) Lot Standards 1. Minimum lot size shall be equivalent to the required square feet per unit following execution of all permitted density adjustments outlined in Section 3.7(�(4). 2. Minimum lot width shall be based on the required minimum lot size per the following table: r'�� s �;�f�� €�� Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te eHAPrE� s: usE sraNDAaas Section 5. I Use Table ��ubsection (A) F�rplanation of Use Table Structure � � . .- . � -. �.. . . . . -. -. • . -. Residential Uses 5.2(C1( I 1 Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(Cl(21(al - Duplex p C 5.2(Cl(21(bl - Townhouse C p 5.2(Cl(21(cl - Multiple-Family C P C C 5.2(Cl(21(dl Detached Dwelling p p p p p p None Group Residential P P P P P 5 2(C1(31 Facility, Single Family Group Residential C C C 5.2(C1(31 Facility, Multi-Family Mobile & Manufactured C C C P C 5.2(Cl(41 Home / Home Park Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p None (public) Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5 2(D1(11 (private) Assisted Living Facilities C P C C P 5•2(Dl(21 Cemeteries C C C C C C C 5•2(Dl(3l Clinics/Medical Services C p p C None Essential Services p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p None Hospitals C p p C 5.2(D1(41 Nursing/Convalescent C C C C C C C C C P P 5.2(Dl(51 Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P P P P P P P P P �} p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2(D1(61 Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5•2(Dl(71 Schools, K-12 C C C C C C � � 5.2(Dl(81 Schools, Higher Education None C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2(Dl(91 �„aa��a t1� ti°i(3tFUCCBBi7 L�ir11i� i�i`C3tYtua€: '' �'ii��.—B .�.�I ��P�� : 115� S°1`.�P�fCi��i�S Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (C) Regulations for Residential Us�� (i) No overnight facilities are provided for the children served. Children are delivered and removed daily. (ii) All state laws and statutes governing such use are strictly adhered to and all required operating permits are secured. (b) Group Residential Facility, Multi-Family (i) Group Residential Facility, Multi-Family shall require authorization through a conditional use permit following the provisions of Section 2.4(D) of this ordinance, subject to the following conditions: 1. Density of residents shall equal no more than one person per 520 square feet of total net livable area in the principal dwelling. 2. Living accommodations for on-site resident staff shall be deducted from the principal dwelling square footage for purposes of determining density in (1) above. 3. The property shall be developed to provide 2 off-street parking spaces for staff and one space per 3 residents for visitors. 4. Parking areas shall be paved with concrete or bituminous surface, and shall meet all other standards of parking lot design in this ordinance, with the exception that the use shall be exempt from curb requirements. 5. The property shall maintain a minimum of 30% landscaped green space based on the gross area of the property. 6. The building shall be designed and constructed to be consistent with the architectural character of the neighborhood in which it is located. (4) Manufactured Homes / Manufactured Home Park (a) Manufactured Homes in General All manufactured homes within the City of Monticello shall be built in conformance with the manufactured home building code and comply with all provisions of this ordinance. (b) Manufactured Home Parks Development of new manufactured home parks shall be encouraged to use the planned unit development (PUD) process to allow the City to vary or modify the strict application and requirements for manufactured home parks to more readily accommodate this type of development. However, absent development through a PUD, the following requirements shall apply: (ii) In General: 1. The minimum total manufactured home park area shall be five acres. 2. Each designated mobile home site shall not be less than 2,500 sf. r'�� .��°�s �;�f�� Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te Section 3.7L): Floodplain Distr•ict ��i�°�� : t15� s��i`��i�5 Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (C) Regulations for Residential Uses 3. Notwithstanding the type of development concept used, the maximum density shall be thirteen (13) manufactured homes per acre. 4. Manufactured homes shall be the only permitted dwelling type in a manufactured home park. 5. No tents shall be used for other than recreational purposes in a manufactured home park. 6. There shall be no outdoor camping anywhere in a manufactured home park. 7. Laundry and clothing shall be hung out to dry only on lines located in Council approved areas established and maintained exclusively for that purpose. 8. Adequate storm shelters for all residents of the manufactured home park shall be provided on-site. 9. No part of any manufactured home park shall be used for non- residential purposes, except such uses that are required for the direct servicing and well-being of park residents and for the management and maintenance of the park. 10. All manufactured homes must be securely anchored in a manner which meets shoreland district requirements (if within a shoreland district) and applicable state requirements for resisting wind forces. (iii) Grading, Drainage and Groundcover: L Condition of soil, ground water level, drainage, topography shall not create hazards to the property or the health and safety of the occupants. 2. The ground surface in all parts of every manufactured home park shall be graded and equipped to drain all surface water in a safe, efficient manner. 3. Exposed ground surfaces in all parts of every manufactured home park shall be paved or covered with stone, screening or other solid material, or protected with a grass that is capable of preventing soil erosion and of eliminating objectionable dust. 4. No portion of a manufactured home park shall be subject to unpredictable or sudden flooding. (iv) Setbacks and Lot Requirements 1. Manufactured homes shall be separated from each other and from other buildings and structures by at least fifteen feet. 2. An accessory structure such as an awning, cabana, storage cabinet, carport, windbreak, and porch which has an opaque top or roof, shall, for purposes of all separation requirements, be considered to be part of the manufactured home. However, applicable building code separation requirements shall still apply as applicable. ��r �t �vior��ceiio �anin� t�r�t�n��q::: 6�� .�� P�� : 115� S°1`.�P�fCi��i�S Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (C) Regulations for Residential Us�� 3. There shall be a minimum distance of twenty feet between the manufactured home stand and abutting park street; 4. All manufactured homes, off-street parking spaces, and structures shall be located at least thirty feet from any property boundary line abutting upon a public street or highway and at least thiriy feet from other property boundary lines; 5. Each manufactured home site shall have frontage on an approved roadway and the corner of each manufactured home site shall be marked and each site shall be numbered. 6. Dedicated storage area(s) and building(s) shall be for the sole use of the residents of the manufactured home park and are not available for use by non-residents. (v) Screening and Open Space 1. All manufactured home parks located adjacent to residential, recreational, commercial or industrial land uses shall provide screening such as fences, shrubs, trees along the properiy boundary line separating the park and such uses, and shall be maintained by the State license holder in a neat and orderly manner. 2. A minimum of 2,000 sf for every acre, or part thereof, in a manufactured home park shall be provided for definable play areas and open space. Such areas of open space and play area shall not be areas included within any setback nor shall they include any areas of less than twenty feet in length or width. (vi) Parking Each manufactured home site shall be served by two (2) off-street parking spaces for automobiles. (vii) Utilities 1. All manufactured homes shall be connected to a public water and sanitary sewer system or a private water and sewer system approved by the State Department of Health. 2. All installations for disposal of surface storm water must be approved by the City. 3. All utility connections shall be as approved by the City. 4. The source of fuel for cooking, heating, or other purposes at each manufactured home site shall be as approved by the City. 5. All utilities shall be underground; there shall be no overhead wires or supporting poles except those essential for street or other lighting purposes. r'�� .� a � �;�f�� Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te Cf-l�il�i`E� S: i�5� Si��f��t�L35 Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (D) Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses 6. No obstruction shall be permitted that impedes the inspection of plumbing, electrical facilities, and related manufactured home equipment. 7. The method of garbage, waste, and trash disposal must be approved by the City. 8. Owner shall pay any required sewer and connection fees to the City. (viii) Lighting: 1. Artificial light shall be maintained during all hours of darkness in all buildings containing public toilets, laundry equipment, and the like. 2. The manufactured home park ground shall be lighted as approved by the City from sunset to sunrise. (D) Re�ulations for Civic and Institutional Uses (1) Active Park Facilities — Private Private park facilities must be operated only for the enj oyment and convenience of the associated residents and their guests. (2) Assisted Living Facilities (a) The development must be contained on an independent parcel; 30% of the parcel must be preserved as open space at least 2/3rds of which shall be useable. (b) To continue to qualify for the senior citizen housing classification, the owner or agent shall annually file with the Community Development Department a certified copy of a monthly resume of occupants of such a multiple dwelling, listing the number of tenants by age. (c) One (1) off-street loading space shall be provided in compliance with Section 4.9, Off-Street Loading Spaces. (d) Elevator service shall be provided to each floor level which contains senior housing units. (e) The site of the main entrance of the principal use is served or is located within four hundred (400) feet of regular transit service. (f) Efficiency units shall be a minimum floor area of 440 square feet, and shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the total number of apartments in a multiple dwelling. �r�y o� �Von�ceiio �aning �r�tlr��r�4.,� ��ge .� 1 � Planning Commission Agenda — 08/04/20 3A. Communitv Development Director's Report COVID-19 City of Monticello Information Resource: https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/covidl9 Council Action on/related to Commission Recommendations • Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 728 square foot residential detached Accessory Building - Major in an R-1 (Single- Family Residence) District. Applicant: Kevin & Sara Haman Approved by the City Council with the Planning Commission's modified conditions on July 13th, 2020 • Consideration of a request for an Amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance to Chapter 3.6, Industrial Base Zoning Districts, related to maximum height of a structure. Applicant: City of Monticello Approved by the City Council on the consent agenda on July 27`h, 2020. Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan The first draft chapters of the Comprehensive Plan - Land Use, Growth, Annexation, and Mobility and Connectivity - were reviewed for preliminary feedback by the Monticello Planning Commission and City Council in a joint session on July 27th, 2020. Representatives from the Monticello Township Board were also present. Planning Commissioners are encouraged to provide comments and feedback as the drafts continued to be refined. The EDA and PARC have met to provide guidance on priorities for the development of the Economic Development and Park, Pathway and Open Space chapters respectively. Housing Study MSA Professionals continue in their work on the updated Housing Study for the community. The housing study is expected to be completed at the end of August. This important document will be a resource for the City and present specific goals and strategies related to housing within Monticello for the years to come. Project consultant MSA will be housing a housing conversation roundtable on Wednesday, August Sth from 7-8 PM. The conversation will be via Zoom meeting. Please find the following link to register: htt�s://tinyurl.com/�yp3wlwu CMRP Updates City staff presented a formal overview of CMRP's organizational and Framework 2030 work to-date in 2020. Click here to view the presentation and to view links to community survey feedback and all Factbook Briefings, including the most current on Land Use. �. � � � �� _,,�� . � � ,,� � � � . � �, � . e;, � _. . "- .. fi. �� . !a . �,. . . �. * R ' P ' T£ - �. � �� "� �` - � ► � � �''� � ; .. �, � , �, , � , _. - . �� , �� 4 � � � " �# � ' �� - . � - � �� _ _ � � �� 4 � � fi, , « � �,. � � � F; � � , -.. _ - � , • ��"4 � � � �R, � '� 4 .�, `"�, _� � , � �, ;� F � ;� � � :�� o � � R � Sk '� � � ` r �_^ .� � ,.. '�, � , _ . . - � � � n� � � r4 ._ � .. �, � � r � .,� ; � � ��. � � � ; � � � � ,,. � . . . , , � ,., , � � � � � �� * � � � �� ; � � � � • � � � ! a s � �� _ ° , , � � *� `- �r�. :� t�'� �'�� y,,� . � �; � � � "�' ..,� '"�i '� �1- „ � ,�� ,_ � r � � �� - — �''�"` � �. �� . � � • � �� ,,�, -� �. �� , � �. �. � � . �� 7 � �� ►�i'�' �' ,�► � r � *�` � " ; , . .�'. � � � ` �,-; �. � � �� ` ` j� ' ,�� ;_ - � . �� 4 � � �� - .. � � \ "11 � �\. � ` t \ � � :1 � � dll � � � � � ��. ��••� �. �'� ' .,.y� ' .:..k` � ' �. . �+ ..� 't ,. � �, �' ` ��€� �� [ ►. ,.� �}' �� " �� . � s �" � � � . . ~ , . �, '`_ * . . ' �1 . ` � \! � �� :� � �� ' 1 _ _ � �' . . . �`� � ` � � �� , � . l w\ ' , • � � � � . . r . � � . � +� i Y. �-� �� - y��... ��* § � . . . � :, ` . �►s � � �/ � � � � ,��I��`�.� a ��`� � ♦ � � '� � '� �x �, _ _ � .�'7� ''�"Y � �� ,� � , ° �Y� �`�� , _r �� _ - � � �� x,. , - � , � �� , a.,� � � � ._. �."= t � v a � � ., i. � • ... ' _ . � � a.�-- . �' ��R` � �4�' ."� � . � �, �� ti ` . .' _a i `.4',it.' � �:y;,f/ �,�. �� ` 1' 1 '1� �` . - ��✓a�� .��"`MY� �� r�`,y+. ro � �� , , y7A '� �a � N' ' � � ��..� . � ��► t1t.'��l�V ��'' ii � '` � . � k �" � `it� ��y� � � � ,. ��y � �$ � �,� � ar+��` a��'`�"' ,� � ' '� � � t �� '�.,, �t�'' ' ' �`�ir� ,�.� - a . ..�� .i��.� �`� � + _ ��i Li4. ., �''� � � :.�,,� ■ � =a.., ` t. �,.s� +��,L'� ,,� ,�� ' '� � � �r j� . �`� � � • ��y �i A "�� \' � � lA�+y' ■ ■ ,��P• `'� �.,�� :�Y. �'�� '�� R �+ �. i �` � �* ' � � �y� s � �� . � �r- 1 V'i .�� a` � ,., ,` ��• � � � 1, `��' ��"�. ��?��.=�i! � ' ��.....� �` � ��, �■,; � �� ,.� �, -�, �,,�-'�•i _ � ' � � - . l: . �_ _ � -i �� ._.,•�,�; _ �,-�. C�'�.�..:_�� :.� _ , �.,,,� — � �� _\�Y. �. \w��* �'b � ` �':�1► :�, � �, r .. — , _ . Cr y"�� a�► -�'� 11� � : '�'o � E �" �� Y � �r, � � ■ � .,� � __� y � .��Fi� . T '� ', �!•` .;: � ` �'�.��"! _ � yra� -�" �. � ■ � � � ,�,i�� '� , � v�, ' . � �+��;�` ',��, y y�� j� : � ` ■ 0. ! � Jtl y`� �#. $ 1, � �' ~^ �� ,,, � � •J �� ,1 io `i�� '` ' 'iI �� ! . � + T a, � R'y i� ,�� ..__ d •. � "' ' l l a r +'o I:'�1� �� '��:.. �� `}'-'.,+?�� 5 1 �y'� � - ` , t�y i'�A` �7•�y�.;,. :�*ais��... -��:;�� .� �' � A ��,� � ` � ��` __ e • �.�4 � ar�^�r � �� _ � . �: � �' O� .�.,� �4 '.,. 'ar ' -`.4. �.... i � � . =��\�� .� � �. .� 1 � .; �ur� � 1,�� "� 1 ',� �L � � _ ,'* ''r ..,�'� _�yi�.:.�i 'q �� ra � �,�� i� � ♦ ��: �`�� +�„� �1��E �=�.��,� ��:�j��. .o..- �,�.-Z � ` ..� � l'��'�►�'� �, `!�� l♦ `.�.�� "' �i `��. � � 7" � , +, . `� �' t . �}-"�r = '� 4 �� iF . F�,� ,, `` � � . •. w I11� ?� - - AI � ,� _��+✓-. - .� �� _� -..i�►.: �` `"" $. 'a',, F s .,,,� , - +. ;.�.— ,�,. � . � �`+� Y � �. . . � � ,�- _ . � i �„!, � �, .� '�'� � ° '�"�'� � '�, IK•�e�Y�.: .r-�, a�� /�'� � �'+�' �,. . `ta� �'— �-C �� '/.�� ` y +'- !� �� ' � . � • �^, 1 � . � , . � � 1j�, _. �a - - - ti,. _ �� j �,N `C _� r��/ f±►„„*Y , � , l :.\. �� r.., ,�., � . . _ . � �s r� � � Na' . �v.� `�- � iF�iT.• _'.�t _ . �... �. t i�" � ` V ..� . � ��. �''i��Fl.�S'�t ,r� �,.\ ��`.. , Ir� ry a., �� ,r�'I' � �.,�`�,,,. �. �'�.,,�J�� .r.ir+�� s '�, `,�� . "rG