The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Agenda 09-01-2020AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September lst, 2020 - 6:15 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Meeting will occur in person with recommended social distancing procedures in place for the Commission, staff, and public. Commissioners: Sam Murdoff, John Alstad, Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, and Alison Zimpfer Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Regular Meeting Minutes — August 4th, 2020 C. Citizen Comments D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda E. Consideration to approve agenda 2. Public Hearings A. Continued Public Hearing — Consideration of a request for Amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance to Chapter 3.5, Business Base Zoning Districts, Subsection (G) Central Community District and Chapter 4.5 Signs related to transparency of window signage in the Downtown; and Chapter 5.1 Use Table and Chapter 8.4 Definitions as related to Mobile & Manufactured Home/Home Park; and Chapters 3.4 Residential Base Zoning Districts and 5.3, Accessory Use Standards as related to building materials references for accessory buildings Applicant: City of Monticello B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Request for Amendment to Planned Unit Development for the Installation of an Accessory Use Photo Studio Building Applicant: Jeff Sell C. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Request for Amendment to Planned Unit Development for the Removal of a Required Fence & Conversion of Self-Storage Space into an Office Use Accessory to the Self-Storage Use Applicant: Keith Burnham D. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Request for Preliminary and Final Plat for a Two-Lot Subdivision in a B-4 (Regional Business) District Applicant: Krishna, LLC 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of the Community Development Director's Report 4. Added Items 5. Adjournment MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 4th, 2020 - 6:15 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Sam Murdoff, John Alstad, Andrew Tapper, and Alison Zimpfer Commissioners Absent: Paul Konsor Council Liaison Absent: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order Sam Murdoff called the Regular Meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 6:15 p.m. B. Consideration of approvin� minutes a. Re�ular Meetin� Minutes — Julv 7th, 2020 JOHN ALSTAD MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — JULY 7TH, 2020. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. b. Special/Joint Meetin� Minutes — Julv 7th, 2020 JOHN ALSTAD MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL/JO1NT MEETING MINUTES — JULY 7TH, 2020. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. C. Citizen Comments None. D. Consideration of addin� items to the a�enda None. E. Consideration to approve a�enda JOHN ALSTAD MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. 2. Public Hearings A. Public Hearin� — Consideration of a request for Amendments to Monticello Zonin� Ordinance to Chapter 3.5, Business Base Zonin� Districts, Subsection (G) Central Communitv District and Chapter 4.5 Si�ns related to transparencv of window si�na�e in the Downtown; and Chapter 5.1 Use Table and Chapter 8.4 Definitions as related to Mobile & Manufactured Home/Home Park; and Chapters 3.4 Residential Base Zonin� Districts and 5.3, Accessorv Use Standards as related to buildin� materials references for accessorv buildin�s. Applicant: Citv of Monticello Planning Commission Minutes — August 4th, 2020 Page 1 � 5 Steve Grittman introduced the item for discussion. He noted the first amendment would add clarity to Accessory Building — Major classification by adding a condition that accessory structures will meet the building materials standards found in Chapter 4. ll(C). This part of the code indicates that certain accessory buildings are required to have additional fa�ade materials based on their location and visibility. Grittman noted that the Planning Commission recently dealt with a request that related to this issue. The second amendment involved the sign ordinance related to window signage and permitting. Grittman stated that window signage is generally allowed without limit or a permit. There is an exception for window signage in the downtown as the intent is to protect the architecture character of the area through window exposure. Staff requested consistency with the code and the downtown plan. A proposed ordinance amendment would require window signage in the Central Community District to have a permit and comply with the Monticello downtown plan. Windows signs in other districts would not be limited or require a permit. The third amendment related to manufactured homes and manufactured home parks. The ordinance currently discusses manufactured homes and manufactured home parks as one. Grittman noted that manufactured homes is a style of building and manufactured home parks relates to land use, which can cause conflicts. Grittman notes that the intent of Section 3.11 and 5.1 is to include manufactured home parks as a land use. Andrew Tapper explained concerns with approving the Zoning Ordinance amendment for requiring a permit for window signage. He noted that his understanding from the Downtown Small Area Study is that the language is intended for exterior finishes, including signage, but not window signage. He reiterated his disagreement with requiring a sign permit for window signage as it is not a part of the cohesiveness of the architecture and overreaching. Sam Murdoff asked if there was a definition for window signage. Angela Schumann noted that the language in the Small Area Plan is broad and that staff have brought forward related ordinances to help achieve the vision of that document. Schumann noted that the Zoning Ordinance does state that window transparency in the Broadway District of the Central Community District (CCD) is a minimum of 50 percent transparency. Schumann noted that the Broadway corridor is intended to be a very customer, walkable, storefront area, where people can see into the store and out. Schumann noted that prominent window signage defeats the purpose of having retail in the downtown. Pine Street and Walnut/Cedar Street are exempt from the proposed downtown ordinance amendment. Schumann noted that there are business owners that don't know that the 50 percent transparency clause exists in the Zoning Ordinance. Schumann noted that if the ordinance passed; the focus of the permit would be to educate property/business owners rather than enforce. Tapper expressed requiring a permit for window signage seemed onerous and would be a business impediment. Tapper noted that his understanding of the Planning Commission Minutes — August 4th, 2020 Page 2 � 5 proposed ordinance would require a permit to place an open sign in the business' storefront window. Schumann noted that staff could tweak the language to be more specific with the Downtown Small Area Study. Grittman provided the window signage definition written into code. Grittman further explained the amendment and noted that City staff can manage the permitting process or fees to make it less onerous on the property/business owner. Sam Murdoff noted that the language, as proposed, may not be the correct trigger to regulate signage. He explained that an enforcement issue may arise and had concerns with property/business owners not knowing about the new ordinance. Murdoff was not opposed to having trigging language to ensure communication with property/business owners, but explained that the proposed language would not be the correct process. Sam Murdoff opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. Grittman asked if the obj ection was the fact that someone would have to get a permit. Murdoff and Tapper agreed. Grittman noted that staff could amend the proposed ordinance to be in compliance with the Downtown Small Area Study and delete the requirement for a permit. Tapper asked if the Downtown Small Area Study was codified and enforceable. Schumann stated it may be more helpful to reference the CCD District code, which requires 50 percent transparency in the Broadway Subdistrict of the CCD. Tapper agreed. John Alstad asked what the intent for the permit would be. Schumann stated that it was for compliance in the beginning, rather than the end. Alstad asked what would occur if a property/business owner requested more than the allowable 50 percent transparency. Grittman responded that a variance would need to be approved. Tapper was concerned with the possibility of the City "picking and choosing" what type of window signs could be allowed and felt it was overreaching to require a permit. Grittman noted that the permit would be evaluated against the code and that the permitting doesn't grant the City any more power generally than what the code already spells out. Grittman provided a verbal amendment of the proposed ordinance amendment. Murdoff asked if that satisfied staf£ Staff noted that the permit requirement would allow staff to address any overuse of window signage prior to installation. Tapper asked if property/business owners would know about the permitting process. Ron Hackenmueller stated it would take a while for them to understand the process and become educated of the permit requirement. Schumann noted that for new businesses or businesses completing rebranding; they would normally complete a sign permit application and a revised sign permit application could include window signage information creating compliance right away. Planning Commission Minutes — August 4th, 2020 Page 3 � 5 Murdoff noted that on the sign permit application it could ask the applicant if they plan to have window signage and the applicant could provide that information voluntarily. Tapper added that instead it could reference the code section. Murdoff asked for a better order of the signage code for window signs ensuring that the maximum area of windows signs is identified first and then that window signs are not considered part of the maximum sign area. Murdoff then discussed the manufactured home parks section of the proposed ordinance amendment. Murdoff was concerned with a potential conflict with Chapter 3.7(I)(1)(b), Performance Based Enhancement District. Grittman noted that cities cannot prohibit manufactured homes where we allow single-family stick-built homes to be constructed. The way the code is written is an illegal clause because it excludes manufactured homes as a building style. Because we allow attached housing in this district, staff wanted to make it clear we are not intending to allow manufacturing home parks. Murdoff thought it was odd to list out the styles of housing and switch to a land use. Grittman stated that the way the clause is written and the way the statute operates, unless we create an exception for manufactured home park land use, we automatically are required to allow manufactured homes unless we exempt out of it. Murdoff asked if that clause could be restructured to separate styles and land use. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE RECONINIENDATION OF SECTION 1(ACCESSORY BUILDING MATERIALS) AND TABLING THE SECTION 2(WINDOW SIGN PERMITTING), AND SECTION 3 AND SECTION 4(MANUFACTURED HOMES AND PARI�S) FOR REVISIONS BASED ON DISCUSSION DURING THE MEETING. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-1 WITH ALISON ZIMPFER VOTING 1N OPPOSITION. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of the Communitv Development Director's Report Angela Schumann provided the Community Development Director's Report. Schumann noted that feedback is being taken from different Boards and Commissions to create a public, draft Comprehensive Plan that can then receive additional engagement from the public in a variety of inedians. She also invited the Planning Commission to participate in a Housing Study Conversation that was being held on August 5, 2020 from 7 to 8 p.m. 4. Added Items None. 5. Adjournment ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:12 P.M. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander Planning Commission Minutes — August 4th, 2020 Page 4 � 5 Approved: September lst, 2020 Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Planning Commission Minutes — August 4th, 2020 Page 5 � 5 Planning Commission Agenda 09/O 1/2020 2A. Continued Public Hearing — Consideration of a repuest for Amendments to Monticello Zonin� Ordinance to Chapter 3.5, Business Base Zonin� Districts, Subsection (G) Central Communitv District and Chapter 4.5 Si�ns related to transparencv of window si�na�e in the Downtown; and Chapter 5.1 Use Table and Chapter 8.4 Definitions as related to Mobile & Manufactured Home/Home Park; and Chapters 3.4 Residential Base Zonin� Districts and 5.3, Accessorv Use Standards as related to buildin� materials references for accessorv buildin�s. Applicant: Citv of Monticella (NAC) A. Property: Planning Case Number: Legal: NA Address: NA 2020-021 REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Amendments to Zoning Ordinance NA NA NA During the regular August meeting, the Planning Commission held a hearing and adopted the first in a series of three amendments intended to clarify various portions of the zoning ordinance. The Commission acted to recommend approval of the ordinance amendments for the accessory building regulations, but tabled action on an amendment relating to the regulation of window signage and an amendment clarifying the provisions for manufactured homes, requesting additional language adjustments. The Commission suggested that window signage not require a permit, but rather provide a reference to the applicable CCD regulations. The Commission also requested a language adjustment within the Performance Based Overlay district which would better clarify that such uses were not permitted within the overlay. Staff has prepared amendments which respond to the requested adjustments, shown in redline on the attached proposed amendment. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC-2020-023, recommending approval of Ordinance Na X, amending the zoning ordinance as noted, based on the findings in the resolution. Planning Commission Agenda 09/O 1/2020 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. PC-2020-023, based on findings to be identified following the public hearing. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution, pending additional information from staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative 1. These are minor amendments which add clarification to the ordinance requirements. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2020-023 B. Draft Ordinance Na X C. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-023 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED TO WINDOW SIGN PERMITTING AND MANUFACTURED HOMES AND PARKS WHEREAS, City staff has identified zoning ordinance language that raises concerns over clarity and applicability related to window sign permitting and manufactured homes and parks; and WHEREAS, City staff has proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance intended to address those concern; and WHEREAS, the amendment would add to the readability of the subj ect ordinance section, increase conformity with the intent of the zoning ordinance generally, and eliminate inapplicable language; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 4th, 2020 and September lst, 2020 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The Zoning Ordinance amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering both the intent and the specific goals and policies for land use in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendments eliminate concerns over applicability and imprecise language. 3. The ordinance incorporates applicable provisions of State law and regulation regarding such uses, thus providing a protection for the public and for the operators of such facilities. 4. The proposed amendment is expected to have no negative impacts on municipal public services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-023 Monticello City Council approves the Zoning Ordinance amendment, based on the findings listed above. ADOPTED this lst day of September, 2020, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING CONINIISSION : ATTEST: Sam Murdoff, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 4.5, SECTION (H) (WINDOW SIGNS IN CCD); TABLE 5-1 (USES BY DISTRICT); AND CHAPTER 3.7, SECTION (�, (MANUFACTURED HOMES AND HOME PARKS) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 4.5 (H) (15) is hereby amended to read as follows: (15) Window Signs. Window si�ns in the CCD zonin� district �'�^" r�^��r� ^ � shall com�ly with the requirements of the a�licable Monticello CCD Si�n re�ulations T'�T��„*�T��„ D'�„ Window si�ns ��*'��r � ��'��*ri�*� �„�' do not require a permit. Window signs are not considered a part of the maximum sign area otherwise allowed under Section 4.5 of this ordinance. Section 2. Section 3.7 (I)(1)(b) is hereby amended to read as follows: (b) By permitting a combination of housing types and styles, including single family, two-family, and multiple family dwellings, � �r�� *��r��"��m� _�r'� ;. Manufactured home parks shall not be permitted in this overlav district. Section 3. Table 5-1, Uses by District, Residential Uses shall be amended as follows: Mobile & Manufactured � Home Park Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor � ��P�`�� 2: .4�PtlC��d�t�� ;��5�� Section 2.4 Specific Revi��t� � r��;�� Po �� ,s� �,r=� r.f�, Subsection (J) Sign Permr�� (� Sign Permits (1) Purpose and Scope This subsection sets out the procedures to follow when requesting a sign permit. (2) Initiation of Proceedings A request for a Sign Permit shall be initiated by application of the property owner or other person having authority to file an application pursuant to Section 23(B), Authority to File Applications. (3) Application (a) All applications for a Sign Permit shall be in accordance with Section 23, Common Review Requirements. (b) In addition to general review requirements, applications for a Sign Permit shall also include at least the following to be considered complete (except as exempted by the Community Development Department): (i) Names and addresses ofthe applicant, owners ofthe sign and lot. (ii) The address(es) at which the sign(s) are to be erected. (iii) The lot, block and addition at which the signs are to be erected and the street on which they are to front. (iv) Type and size of sign (e.g., wall sign, pylon sign). (v) A site plan (or survey if required by the Community Development Department) which is to scale showing the location of lot lines, building structures, parking areas, existing and proposed signs and any other physical features. (vi) Plans, location and specifications and method of construction and attachment to the buildings or placement method on the ground. (vii) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing that the structure is designed for dead load and wind pressure in any direction in the amount required by this and all other laws and ordinances of the City, if required. (viii) Written consent of the owner or lessee of any site on which the sign is to be erected. (ix) Any electrical permit required and issued for the sign. (x) A detailed description of any electronic or electrical components that are proposed to be added to the sign. SIGN PERMIT � Section 2.4(H) All sig�2 requirements can be found in Section 4.5: Si�ns Section 2.3: Common Review Requirements r'�� - �;�f�� €�� Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te �`��"�� s ��1��;��;� ��g� �i�viL3 t��Ei}i1�E5 � :.,'i�� <_ ti� '�' � e"� ,�_ �,« � :��:edures & Requirements ��.rbsection (J) Sign Permits (xi) If the proposed sign is a sandwich board sign to be located in the CCD District, the owner of the sign shall provide a certificate of general liability insurance with minimum coverage of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00) naming the City as an additional insured for the sign to be located upon the public right-of-way within the CCD, Central Community District. (xii) Other information to demonstrate compliance with this and all other ordinances of the City. (4) Review (a) Sign Review Criteria Approval of a Sign Permit application shall be based on the following criteria: (i) Whether the proposed sign is consistent with all the requirements of this ordinance and any other City Code requirements; (ii) Whether the proposed sign is in compliance with the applicable zoning district and overlay district regulations; and (iii) Whether the proposed sign meets all the requirements or conditions of any applicable development approvals or agreements. (b) Sign Review Process (i) The Community Development Department will review all sign permit requests. (ii) Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(K)(4)(a) shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. (iii) Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(K)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. (5) Reasonable Conditions In approving a sign permit, the Community Development Department may impose such reasonable conditions and requirements as it deems necessary and appropriate to ensure continued compliance with a sign permit review criteria. �i�y �t �vior��eeiio �aning t�r�trr��r�4 �:;� `',�� 'r` CN�PT��2 2: .��PtIC�iT1t�lii �� F��t�+��S Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedur� ��ro �� r� ��r�� re� Subsection (K) Temporary Use Perms�� (6) Effect of a Sign Permit Approval ��) �g) (a) The issuance of a Sign Permit shall authorize only the installation or replacement of signage approved by the Community Development Department. (b) A Sign Permit, including any conditions, shall run with the land and shall not be affected by a change in ownership. Time Limit (a) Failure to install the approved signage within six months of the date of approval will invalidate the permit. (b) Upon written request, one extension of six months may be granted by the Community Development Department ifthe applicant can show good cause. Amendments All requested amendments to an existing sign permit shall be processed in the same manner as a new application. (9) Appeal The applicant for a Sign Permit may appeal the decision of the Community Development Department to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals per Section 2.4(H). (I� Temporary Use Permits (1) Purpose and Scope This subsection sets out the procedures to follow when requesting a Temporary Use permit. (2) Initiation of Proceedings A request for a Temporary Use Permit shall be initiated by application of the property owner or other person having authority to file an application pursuant to Section 23(B), Authority to File Applications. (3) Application (a) All applications for a Temporary Use Permit shall be in accordance with Section 2.3, Common Review Requirements. TEMPORARY USE PERMIT Decisitt� Section 2.4(H) Page 4=�' City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance ��`�� : ��i��i'�� i�1��1��5 ��ction 3.5 Business Base Zoning Districts ��.absection (� Central Community District Buildin�s adjacent to sin�le family. Building side walls adjacent to single family residentially zoned properties, or directly across a public street from such properties, shall have side wall heights of no greater than the horizontal distance to the nearest single-family structure. Buildings abutting single family residentially zoned properties shall have roofs sloping toward the abutting single family use, or shall employ at least one ofthe transitional features in Section 4.7 of this ordinance. f. Buildin� materials. Building materials for all uses shall be predominantly glass, brick, natural or cultured stone, or equivalent masonry materiaL Materials for lapped siding, board-and-batten, or shake exteriors shall be composite, maintenance free materials, and shall be limited in overall exterior use to: o Residential structures, no more than 30 percent of building exterior. o Commercial and other structures, no more than 15 percent of building exterior may be comprised of architectural metal, which shall be integrated into the building design. o Mixed use buildings shall comply with the commercial building requirements. 3. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS a. CharacterAreaStandards i. Broadwav • All buildings should have a storefront or entrance on Broadway. Buildings shall be oriented toward the front of the lot, with a maximum 10' setback. Setbacks may be increased to accommodate outdoor seating or activity spaces approved by Planning Commission during site plan review. Such spaces shall be improved with enhanced paving and landscaping materials and other elements. Storefronts facing any public street shall consist of a minimum of 50% window/door transparency on ground floor. Buildings shall be between 2-4 stories, additional stories may be authorized by conditional use permit. Single-story buildings may be approved through site plan review by the Planning Commission and City Council where multiple stories are impractical for the specific use. In such cases, the building architecture should incorporate a fa�ade that mimics multiple stories through additional window openings or similar features. Buildings shall have a maximum width of 60 feet, or shall be articulated by setback, materials or window treatments roofline variation, or other design methods to reflect the appearance of separate buildings, in approximately 30- 60' increments. �i�y o� �Von�eeiio �aning �r�trr��r�4 .� 6s�ge f i 'i` ��P�� 3: �C3►�iiP�t� �1S°1`�i�iS Section 3.5 Business Base Zoning Districts Subsection (� Central Community District Ground floor commercial buildings which front on public streets or open space shall not be entirely comprised of office uses, but shall include other retail, hospitality or entertainment uses. • Sidewalks and/or pathway connections shall be provided for all development projects. ii. Walnut/Cedar • Features such as upper balconies, dormers, courtyards, porches and dooryards shall be incorporated for residential uses. Buildings shall be between 2- 4 stories; additional stories may be authorized by conditional use permit. Single-story buildings may be approved through site plan review by the Planning Commission and the City Council where multiple stories are impractical for the specific use. In such cases, the building architecture should incorporate a fa�ade that mimics multiple stories through additional window openings or similar features. Buildings shall be oriented toward Walnut and Cedar Street and toward front corners where applicable. iii. Pine Street • Buildings shall be between 2-4 stories; additional stories may be authorized by conditional use permit. Single-story buildings may be approved through site plan review by the Planning Commission and the City Council where multiple stories are impractical for the specific use. In such cases, the building architecture should incorporate a fa�ade that mimics multiple stories through additional window openings or similar features. • Buildings shall be oriented to Pine Street with secondary entrances located on side or interior facades. Corner properties shall have dual orientation. b. Use Tvpe Standards i. Residential • Single/Two Family: Where permitted, the requirements of the R-2 District will apply. • Townhouse o Permitted where the subject property has no direct frontage on Broadway or Wa1nuUCedar. o Must preserve open space to coordinate with public spaces. o Building heights up to 25 feet or 2 stories above grade. o Setbacks — 15 feet from abutting single family, minimum of 8 feet from public street. Interior side setbacks may be zero. o Variable roofline and front building walls. i�� i i � �;�Ft� �t iYie;nticeif� �onrr�g �raincrnte �`�:��""�� w �ti�F��-lii�� i°��5 Section 4.5 Signs Subsection (H) General Provisions (12) Height The top of a wall sign, including its superstructure, if any, shall be no higher than the roof of the building to which such sign may be attached. (13) Landscaping A site plan shall be submitted as a part of any application for a freestanding sign which includes plans for the landscaping of the area near the sign, and which demonstrates that the sign will complement the existing or proposed general site landscaping of the property. (14) Vehicle Fuel Facilities Signs for vehicle fuel facilities shall be regulated by the sign provisions for the zoning district in which the facility is located, except that within a freestanding sign, an area not to exceed si�teen (16) square feet shall be allowed for continuous display (no flashing, scrolling or other animation) of electronic or non-electronic changeable copy identifying current fuel prices in accordance with Minnesota state statutes section 239.751. (15) Window Signs Window signs are not considered a part of the maximum sign area otherwise allowed under Section 4.5 of this ordinance and do not require a permit. (16) Changeable Copy Signs (a) Changeable copy signs are subject to the following additional regulations: (i) Signs must be permanently anchored to the structure. (ii) Signs must be incorporated within the overall sign structure for both monument and pylon signs and must be consistent in design with the sign structure. (b) Within commercial and industrial districts and for civic and institutional uses including, but not limited to, public school facilities, hospital and medical facilities, municipal facilities and places of public assembly, one (1) changeable copy sign shall be allowed per site provided that the area of the sign not exceed twenty-five (25) percent ofthe allowable sign area or fifty (50) square feet, whichever is less, for a freestanding or wall sign. The area of this sign shall be counted against the maximum sign area for the building, except where the property owner has agreed to forgo the use of temporary signs in accordance Section 4.5(I)(2) in which case the area ofthe changeable copy sign shall be allowed in excess of the maximum sign area. �r�r at �vior��rceiio �aning t�r�t�r�c�r�4 �::� r3�g� � 1 � ��t��-�� : zc��r�� is��i��-s Section 3J Overlay Zoning Districts ��bsection (1) Per formance Based Enhancement District (4) LED Illumination Section 4.S�II)�7): In the Freeway Bonus Sign District, unshielded LED (Light Emitting Diode) Illuminated Si�ns illumination may be used pursuantto the regulations found in Section 4S(H)(7). (H) DW: Drinkin� Water Supplv Mana�ement Area RESERVED (I) Performance Based Enhancement District (1) Purpose The purpose of the Performance Based Enhancement Overlay District is to provide for by-right development flexibility and enhancement in exchange for meeting special design controls and/or protecting sensitive natural features. The district is intended to create a reasonable balance between the interests of a property owner seeking more development options on a property and the interests of the surrounding property owners in the following ways: (a) By encouraging a more creative approach in commercial and housing developments that will result in quality living environments through innovative design and aesthetic controls; (b) By permitting a combination of housing types and styles, including single family, two-family, and multiple family dwellings, with the exception of manufactured homes; (c) By allowing flexibility in design by permitting cluster developments and a variety of architectural styles and treatments; (d) By allowing flexibility in setback and height restrictions; (e) By providing an eff�icient use of land resulting in more cost eff�icient installation of utilities, streets, and other facilities; (f) By encouraging the preservation of common open space, recreational facilities, natural features such as woodland, wetland, and flood plain; (g) By contributing to the tax base of the community without making undue demands on the community services; (h) By providing the means for greater fle�bility in environmental design than is provided under the strict application of the Monticello zoning ordinance and �i�y o� ��on�eelio �aning �r�trr��r�4.� 6s�ge 1�S'i` ��P�� 3: �C3►�iiP�t� C31S°1`�1�iS Section 3J Overlay Zoning Districts Subsection (1) Performance Based Enhancement Distr�� subdivision ordinance while at the same time preserving general welfare of the City of Monticello and its inhabitants. (2) District Application The provisions of Section 3.7(I) shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Monticello that are denoted on the official zoning map as being within the performance based enhancement overlay district. (3) Relation to Underlying Zoning District The performance based enhancement district provides different opportunities based on the underlying zoning district as follows: (a) R-1 and R-2 Base Zoning Districts Properties with a base zoning district classification of R-1 or R-2 within the performance based enhancement district can provide a harmonious mixture of different residential land use types to best utilize the development potential of the land given the natural environment and existing/future adjacent land uses. (i) Uses in general Uses shall be governed by the regulations for the R-2 zoning district as outlined in Tables 5-1, 5=4 and 5=6. (ii) Allowed Density 1. The base density shall be governed by the regulations for the underlying zoning district. 2. Adjustments to the allowed base density shall be permitted in accordance with the provisions of the performance based enhancement district, but in no case shall the maximum density of the underlying zoning district be exceeded. 3. Allowed percentage reductions to base density requirements shall always be calculated off the standard base density for the underlying zoning district, with the sum of all allowed reductions being used to calculate the final allowed density. (iii) Lot Standards 1. Minimum lot size shall be equivalent to the required square feet per unit following execution of all permitted density adjustments outlined in Section 3.7(�(4). 2. Minimum lot width shall be based on the required minimum lot size per the following table: r'�� s �;�f�� €�� Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te eHAPrE� s: usE sraNDAaas Section 5. I Use Table ��ubsection (A) F�rplanation of Use Table Structure � � . .- . � -. �.. . . . . -. -. • . -. Residential Uses 5.2(C1( I 1 Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(Cl(21(al - Duplex p C 5.2(Cl(21(bl - Townhouse C p 5.2(Cl(21(cl - Multiple-Family C P C C 5.2(Cl(21(dl Detached Dwelling p p p p p p None Group Residential P P P P P 5 2(C1(31 Facility, Single Family Group Residential C C C 5.2(C1(31 Facility, Multi-Family Mobile & Manufactured C C C P C 5.2(Cl(41 Home / Home Park Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p None (public) Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5 2(D1(11 (private) Assisted Living Facilities C P C C P 5•2(Dl(21 Cemeteries C C C C C C C 5•2(Dl(3l Clinics/Medical Services C p p C None Essential Services p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p None Hospitals C p p C 5.2(D1(41 Nursing/Convalescent C C C C C C C C C P P 5.2(Dl(51 Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P P P P P P P P P �} p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2(D1(61 Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5•2(Dl(71 Schools, K-12 C C C C C C � � 5.2(Dl(81 Schools, Higher Education None C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2(Dl(91 �„aa��a t1� ti°i(3tFUCCBBi7 L�ir11i� i�i`C3tYtua€: '' �'ii��.—B .�.�I ��P�� : 115� S°1`.�P�fCi��i�S Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (C) Regulations for Residential Us�� (i) No overnight facilities are provided for the children served. Children are delivered and removed daily. (ii) All state laws and statutes governing such use are strictly adhered to and all required operating permits are secured. (b) Group Residential Facility, Multi-Family (i) Group Residential Facility, Multi-Family shall require authorization through a conditional use permit following the provisions of Section 2.4(D) of this ordinance, subject to the following conditions: 1. Density of residents shall equal no more than one person per 520 square feet of total net livable area in the principal dwelling. 2. Living accommodations for on-site resident staff shall be deducted from the principal dwelling square footage for purposes of determining density in (1) above. 3. The property shall be developed to provide 2 off-street parking spaces for staff and one space per 3 residents for visitors. 4. Parking areas shall be paved with concrete or bituminous surface, and shall meet all other standards of parking lot design in this ordinance, with the exception that the use shall be exempt from curb requirements. 5. The property shall maintain a minimum of 30% landscaped green space based on the gross area of the property. 6. The building shall be designed and constructed to be consistent with the architectural character of the neighborhood in which it is located. (4) Manufactured Homes / Manufactured Home Park (a) Manufactured Homes in General All manufactured homes within the City of Monticello shall be built in conformance with the manufactured home building code and comply with all provisions of this ordinance. (b) Manufactured Home Parks Development of new manufactured home parks shall be encouraged to use the planned unit development (PUD) process to allow the City to vary or modify the strict application and requirements for manufactured home parks to more readily accommodate this type of development. However, absent development through a PUD, the following requirements shall apply: (ii) In General: 1. The minimum total manufactured home park area shall be five acres. 2. Each designated mobile home site shall not be less than 2,500 sf. r'�� .��°�s �;�f�� Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te Section 3.7L): Floodplain Distr•ict ��i�°�� : t15� s��i`��i�5 Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (C) Regulations for Residential Uses 3. Notwithstanding the type of development concept used, the maximum density shall be thirteen (13) manufactured homes per acre. 4. Manufactured homes shall be the only permitted dwelling type in a manufactured home park. 5. No tents shall be used for other than recreational purposes in a manufactured home park. 6. There shall be no outdoor camping anywhere in a manufactured home park. 7. Laundry and clothing shall be hung out to dry only on lines located in Council approved areas established and maintained exclusively for that purpose. 8. Adequate storm shelters for all residents of the manufactured home park shall be provided on-site. 9. No part of any manufactured home park shall be used for non- residential purposes, except such uses that are required for the direct servicing and well-being of park residents and for the management and maintenance of the park. 10. All manufactured homes must be securely anchored in a manner which meets shoreland district requirements (if within a shoreland district) and applicable state requirements for resisting wind forces. (iii) Grading, Drainage and Groundcover: L Condition of soil, ground water level, drainage, topography shall not create hazards to the property or the health and safety of the occupants. 2. The ground surface in all parts of every manufactured home park shall be graded and equipped to drain all surface water in a safe, efficient manner. 3. Exposed ground surfaces in all parts of every manufactured home park shall be paved or covered with stone, screening or other solid material, or protected with a grass that is capable of preventing soil erosion and of eliminating objectionable dust. 4. No portion of a manufactured home park shall be subject to unpredictable or sudden flooding. (iv) Setbacks and Lot Requirements 1. Manufactured homes shall be separated from each other and from other buildings and structures by at least fifteen feet. 2. An accessory structure such as an awning, cabana, storage cabinet, carport, windbreak, and porch which has an opaque top or roof, shall, for purposes of all separation requirements, be considered to be part of the manufactured home. However, applicable building code separation requirements shall still apply as applicable. ��r �t �vior��ceiio �anin� t�r�t�n��q::: 6�� .�� P�� : 115� S°1`.�P�fCi��i�S Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (C) Regulations for Residential Us�� 3. There shall be a minimum distance of twenty feet between the manufactured home stand and abutting park street; 4. All manufactured homes, off-street parking spaces, and structures shall be located at least thirty feet from any property boundary line abutting upon a public street or highway and at least thiriy feet from other property boundary lines; 5. Each manufactured home site shall have frontage on an approved roadway and the corner of each manufactured home site shall be marked and each site shall be numbered. 6. Dedicated storage area(s) and building(s) shall be for the sole use of the residents of the manufactured home park and are not available for use by non-residents. (v) Screening and Open Space 1. All manufactured home parks located adjacent to residential, recreational, commercial or industrial land uses shall provide screening such as fences, shrubs, trees along the properiy boundary line separating the park and such uses, and shall be maintained by the State license holder in a neat and orderly manner. 2. A minimum of 2,000 sf for every acre, or part thereof, in a manufactured home park shall be provided for definable play areas and open space. Such areas of open space and play area shall not be areas included within any setback nor shall they include any areas of less than twenty feet in length or width. (vi) Parking Each manufactured home site shall be served by two (2) off-street parking spaces for automobiles. (vii) Utilities 1. All manufactured homes shall be connected to a public water and sanitary sewer system or a private water and sewer system approved by the State Department of Health. 2. All installations for disposal of surface storm water must be approved by the City. 3. All utility connections shall be as approved by the City. 4. The source of fuel for cooking, heating, or other purposes at each manufactured home site shall be as approved by the City. 5. All utilities shall be underground; there shall be no overhead wires or supporting poles except those essential for street or other lighting purposes. r'�� .� a � �;�f�� Yie;n�icet"s"� �onir�g �rcr'ir�crr�te Cf-l�il�i`E� S: i�5� Si��f��t�L35 Section 5.2 Use-Speci fic Standards Subsection (D) Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses 6. No obstruction shall be permitted that impedes the inspection of plumbing, electrical facilities, and related manufactured home equipment. 7. The method of garbage, waste, and trash disposal must be approved by the City. 8. Owner shall pay any required sewer and connection fees to the City. (viii) Lighting: 1. Artificial light shall be maintained during all hours of darkness in all buildings containing public toilets, laundry equipment, and the like. 2. The manufactured home park ground shall be lighted as approved by the City from sunset to sunrise. (D) Re�ulations for Civic and Institutional Uses (1) Active Park Facilities — Private Private park facilities must be operated only for the enj oyment and convenience of the associated residents and their guests. (2) Assisted Living Facilities (a) The development must be contained on an independent parcel; 30% of the parcel must be preserved as open space at least 2/3rds of which shall be useable. (b) To continue to qualify for the senior citizen housing classification, the owner or agent shall annually file with the Community Development Department a certified copy of a monthly resume of occupants of such a multiple dwelling, listing the number of tenants by age. (c) One (1) off-street loading space shall be provided in compliance with Section 4.9, Off-Street Loading Spaces. (d) Elevator service shall be provided to each floor level which contains senior housing units. (e) The site of the main entrance of the principal use is served or is located within four hundred (400) feet of regular transit service. (f) Efficiency units shall be a minimum floor area of 440 square feet, and shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the total number of apartments in a multiple dwelling. �r�y o� �Von�ceiio �aning �r�tlr��r�4.,� ��ge .� 1 � Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 2B. Public Hearin� — Consideration of a request for an amendment to a Planned Unit Development for the Installation of an Accessorv Use Photo Studio Buildin�. Applicant: Jeff Sell/West Metro. (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, Carcone Addition & Lot 1, Block 2, Carcone Addition PIDs: 155-217-001010 & 155-217-002010 Address: 1001 State Highway 25 South & 103 Sandberg Road Planning Case Number: 2020-020 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: Amendment to Planned Unit Development September 28, 2020 (extended to November 27 — 120 days) Places to Shop B-3 Highway Business District The purpose of the `B-3" (Highway Business) district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District Automobile Sales I-94 Automobile Dealerships Childcare Facility Vacant Commercial Project Description: The project adds an accessory building to the southwest corner of the westerly parcel (of two used for this dealership). The building would be located near the south boundary line where there is currently a dumpster enclosure, constructed of wood fencing material. The Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 south boundary is shared with a parcel owned by the Cornerstone auto dealership, south of which is a commercial daycare facility. The applicants have stated that the accessory building — at 30' square (900 square feet), would replace the dumpster enclosure, which would be moved to another location, perhaps off-site. The accessory building would be constructed specifically to house a photography facility that the dealership uses to market its vehicles. The structure is prefabricated with an internal turntable, on which the vehicle sits and is photographed automatically. The building is a metal-sided and metal-roofed structure, proposed to be located 6 feet from the west and south property lines. ANALYSIS Planned tlnit Development Amendmen� The purpose of the PUD amendment in this case is to accommodate the installation of an accessory building. The applicant wishes to remove the trash enclosure and add the accessory building in its location. Accessory buildings are permitted uses in the B-3 District. Site Access. The accessory building would be accessed through the entrance off of Sandberg Road. The proposed accessory building would not require a change in the site's primary entrance. There is no public access to the proposed building; entrance to the building is intended to be by staff only. There is no issue with the site access. Off-Street Parkin�. The intended use of the accessory use building does not show a need for an increase in off-street parking needs. The use of the building is primarily contained within the business and the applicant has stated no indication to offer the service to the public. If the applicant offers the service to the public the demand for the service may require an adjustment of the parking requirements. Setbacks. The applicable setbacks for accessory buildings is at least six feet from all lot lines. The submitted survey shows compliance with these requirements. The existing concrete pad under the trash enclosure currently encroaches into these setbacks, apparently up to the adj oining property lines. This encroaching portion of the concrete pad should be removed as a part of the project, along with any other site encroachments, and replaced with landscaping and appropriate stormwater drainage control as directed by the City Engineering staff. 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 Maximum Heigh� Detached accessory structures shall not exceed fifteen feet in height. The proposed building height is not specified on the submitted plans, but appears to meet the height standards at approximately 12 feet. Trash Enclosure. The location of the accessory use is in the current site of the trash enclosure in the southwest corner of the property. The trash handling equipment is proposed to be relocated off-site. The applicant should plan for any zoning approvals related to another site location if necessary. In the alternative, a detached enclosure could be located elsewhere in the side yard of the property. The applicant should specify an alternative consistent with these requirements. Finish Materia� The proposed building is metal sided and the applicant has indicated it will match the building to the other buildings on the property in color, using white siding with black trim. According to the Ordinance, buildings in B-3 Districts must adhere to the following material requirements, per Section 4.11 (D): (2) Buildings in these zoning districts shall maintain a high standard of architectural and aesthetic compatibility with conforming surrounding properties to ensure that they will not adversely impact the property values of the abutting properties and shall have a positive impact on the public health, safety, and general welfare, insofar as practicable. ii. Metal exterior finishes shall be permitted only where coordinated into the overall architectural design of the structure, such as in window and door frames, mansard roofs or parapets, and other similar features, and in no case shall constitute more than 15% of the total exterior finish of the building Metal exterior finishes are permitted where they coordinate with the overall architectural design of the structure, and don't exceed 15% of the exterior finish. Under the PUD, the applicant seeks flexibility from this standard, suggesting that the structure is a prefabricated unit sold by the photography vendor, and no site-built structure meeting the City's exterior standards is possible, given the technology used in the structure. In PUD flexibility requests, the City is required to find that the proposed proj ect is consistent with the goals and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, even while it may not meet the specific standards of the zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to address this aspect of the request. One option discussed by staff is to consider the building an interim improvement, and consider any PUD Amendment to be an Interim Use Permit, pending alternative construction, or relocation to a conforming building or site. The applicant has Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 suggested that the structure may be temporary, moving to another site or building long-term. If this interim option is considered as an acceptable alternative, the Planning Commission should specify a duration of the Interim Use Permit. Gradin�, Draina�e and tltilities. The submitted plan does not have grading, drainage and utility plans and any construction would be subj ect to review and comment by the City Engineer. For the purposes of the PUD Amendment request, the City Engineer has made the following comments: 1. Building is currently shown outside of the drainage and utility easement, if the building location changes further review may be necessary. 2. Design drainage around new building so that it does not impact adjacent properties. 3. Provide drainage arrows and percent slope on plans submitted for building permit. In summary, the proposed accessory building photo studio would be a reasonably expected use in a B-3 business district. The use is compatible with the surrounding area which includes a commercial auto sales lot and childcare center. However, the applicant has requested flexibility from the commercial building materials standard, which may be considered as part of an interim condition by the City. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2020-024, recommending approval of the amendment to the PUD, based on findings in the resolution, and incorporating the conditions in Exhibit Z of this report. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2020-024, based on findings to be identified at the hearing. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution, pending additional information from applicant or staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the site plan and PUD amendment with the conditions identified in Exhibit Z attached to this report. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2020-024 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative 0 Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 D. Site Survey E. Site Images Z. Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 Exhibit Z Amendment to Planned Unit Development Lot 1, Block 1, Carcone Addition & Lot 1, Block 2, Carcone Addition 1001 State Highway 25 South & 103 Sandberg Road The trash handling equipment shall be relocated to an area attached to, or within, the principal building, or in a reasonable location that is not in a yard adj oining a public street. 2. The applicant will construct the building to meet setback requirements of 6 feet from both side and rear property lines. The applicant removes concrete pad encroaching into the 6 foot setback area, and replaces it with landscaping required by Chapter 4.1 of the zoning ordinance. 4. The applicant shall submit a building permit for the accessory building which will indicate the location and materials utilized in the construction of the building. The applicant executes a revised development agreement specifying the term of an interim use permit under the PUD and the termination date of such permit. 6. The accessory use building shall be subj ect to the review and requirements of the City Engineer, including those within the report dated 9/1/20 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-024 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE WEST METRO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ADDING AN ACCESSORY BUILDING TO THE SITE WITHIN THE WEST METRO PUD ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct an accessory building for use as an automated photography studio for the applicant's vehicles for sale; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned B-3, Highway Commercial, and is subject to a previously approved Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Places to Shop" for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking flexibility from the building materials standards of the B-3 District as a part of an interim use on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided materials otherwise documenting compliance with the terms of the applicable zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B-3 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the uses will not create any unanticipated changes to the demand for public services on or around the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September lst, 2020 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B-3, Highway Business Zoning District. 2. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-024 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed accessory building meets the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, subj ect to the flexibility granted under the PUD and the conditions attached to this PUD Amendment. No impacts on public utilities or other services are foreseen as a result of the proposed amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Planned Unit Development for a photo studio accessory building, subj ect to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: The trash handling equipment shall be relocated to an area attached to, or within, the principal building, or in a reasonable location that is not in a yard adj oining a public street. 2. The applicant will construct the building to meet setback requirements of 6 feet from both side and rear property lines. The applicant removes concrete pad encroaching into the 6 foot setback area, and replaces it with landscaping required by Chapter 4.1 of the zoning ordinance. 4. The applicant shall submit a building permit for the accessory building which will indicate the location and materials utilized in the construction of the building. The applicant executes a revised development agreement specifying the term of an interim use permit under the PUD and the termination date of such permit. 6. The accessory use building shall be subj ect to the review and requirements of the City Engineer, including those within the report dated 9/1/20. ADOPTED this lst day of September, 2020 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING CONINIISSION : 2 Sam Murdoff, Chair CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-024 ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director � .r , � I� `�. -'y �� f� �'} 1�.:4�i��4 � �� - ,-: i o ; + � � � ' " i f'� '" �iL ��i�l'4��1�1 �` o — � � ls�ada3� ,. � - � �,�": �a ��d� sdwoHl w ' f � � � � U � '' r r N _. � � � �� '` ; � . � `I . ` �� ' �"� ',r� - °� � ° r�r ��P¢ �� J � � � , � � � �'., . .: P Q�� ''7 CC7 r �� • i n� r � ' `�� ;'' N . - /� �% } C � („) , w' ..' * � .a. '�O� a t'°i ; . � - r , !�i � � � �.. �� . � Q �� :�� . � � �r � _• r � �� '� ' , ,,' ,�,� � R � � fl � �f' v � " - . u� � ' �. �"„� ' ,�v� a, tL � � ,., , � . � .r. � -�- -„' � . ;� � ��U� w - rr ' t,? � ! s , � �_ _ • , N �} • , `'�' a�-� � °` +�,� � _ .,, t� ��a� '+ � y�.. o f � � r, _ � . � } � t � ~ ` • - " p� ►�' , + � � � . .. 'F� � i i Q :� ti � ' r�:. �'� �i ', � .-� � -t- - f� _ 4'} r � .: ■{- �; ,� :f ,yr �: t, � � P� � ',� � �w �- � , � �� ' � C� d . � =jy *, * y � � Q t7'Q� `_ . +I � � ° �S #� .. ._.\ �� r:. ..q .,.,. ' O. 1� F � \ - ti'� , �Ir . , v �, �: , , 1 � �� ' �� J �.�� ' � � *-�� '� ,,� * �r. ~ v�j; r� .. " i .y""�..�, .. ` .tF R � I°" . � u-s � ` ,, j � � �� ' .� � ; `�' �- '�� r1 ' . , �" , :, p r � __ +i ��µ��." ` � ± f' r r`'` �p � � � �� - �� {�. !��r�� v 5' '` �.� .. tiwr�,� _ . > ,. ��•� � �, s �� . �- ,p � � , F �G� � � ,t rr. _ � . O . . G Q ' - r � * � , ar'�• �� ` y'� -f� f� � , F� � ,.�it �r�...ny . � r � , � ''� �� , �tg �•� ' '�` . � � � .•�.•k�s . � , p I',�.�` i' ',^ y:t�r:.� Lfi . cN.9�t ` F,'�+lru'94q��, I . V� �' I i ar t�d r.xtor ..1N �� 4 e— �� I, �r rr ■ � � � KI �. R�I � i' I � :Liy QO !� � .!ILIIFI.I�MI►U� JCJ�QQI' �� _ . ` 114 F NKt.. . .. � +i � � _ . � � *+� rFr� � ,a ,� ��' ^ � �i � "' �.--G N _ osi - � � +-+ {+� r � �`u.; r, ,�� , ,� � �,.y . . i . � �,r �� .. —� '�.�j ;.� : � , � s•��..� .__ � - �� r� .. ,.. ..ti.� � � � - 4y �. � � :'' !� r � G w.... _ � . � Q � ��j 5i� � ` �� ,��_ �. + � � {.� u7 ' �� Q • �� + o � ,u7 �:' � r �ry - � O w � .. � r s..r7 - a lfy � w. � V ; � r" -•� L u y � r a� i�' �f MAF2V11��R❑ v' U �' r*� � ,�,` ,; r � � � �� 1�_ . Q r�� •' � -. i-� V � : �i` � F � � � f`� ' � � c�l �f � � m N . t!` f �^� I� ' � > O'• `� . 4 �� , �� " � � �. c-I ia7 � � � � t c -lC7 � +�• � . F � � �, � o °rl r � ,�_— � � �. 4 ,,� � o � �. ,._r - � I �1� � �, � W � j( O'� � 4 4 `�1F 7..r,`.` a .� . ,_. � w c ` � c� ` 4�� r'� Q p � r . S�A � � . ti � L +' +'� � k' 1 J � � �� :� � `P:: O � � � �C1J� rj .- � - �r s � , � � r-, Y _ i� ' � � r �,� N � � , �, .. O t � � � . � (6 � � � � 4 ; ��`� � � ' �' i N U �` � • � � � ��l` l/ 0� • c r [� �' — � �� , . a� . - . ` i o 'r` F sv �`� m� �'� R � � � oo �. �" i_� .�� f�-�-��" t'� '� yZ ,�r PLPC�c C7 r�' r' M` � � � � i+ ��,. � "'� �.-� r . � . - . . � � � �',R� : (� . � � J `� �t J+ �r, � � � i ' . � � � � j _ � . �, INEST M ET R � �� BUICK �Lr�� Photo Studio Project Plan 07/30/2020 Overview We are applying to install a photo studio building next to our detail center/car wash across the road from our main dealership lot. The location will allow us to wash cars and pull them directly into the studio. The photo studio will streamline our vehicle photo process by allowing us to take photos whenever needed, as opposed to our current process of using a third party to take photos of our vehicles three days a week. The photo studio would improve our photo quality and appearance and would also save us time and money by taking our photo process in-house. Dealermade is the company who will be installing the photo studio. You can find their website at www.dealermade.com. Building The building is metal-sided and has 30'x30' dimensions. We are planning on matching the building to the colors of other buildings on the property, white with black trim. i `.�:'li�� klkx�rk I �4�obl.•�4�Ik�� lind�n.nr �ria.hldr � ��; �\ 1 �� : � � � �� . f'P:n� InnhNnnS�n Ih�ev�cai��r:�5' �}uakr.rl;r.vr � I � � � � � � ' t�_ i �i �..:� is.i�,�.� i�,l� �.Intcldur Ei•�r�remi .. �� "— _. - _ - � � ��' � I � � POURlNG A SLAQ FaR THE METAL BUILDING WE SUGGEST THE FC7LL�WIIVG f]IMENSI�NS H�VNEVER CHECK WITH Y�l1R CC]NTRACTOR RN[7 THE C9TY F4R YC3UR L{]CAL REC�iIJIREMENTS. CONCRETE PAa SUGGESTIONS Pour con�rete fi' (inches} wider and ionger [30` fi" x 3U' 6�) that the building size (3�f`x30'] lrh�s vwll create a fi� overpaur area araund the outside perimeter ta div�rt water. The Foot�er q1' fram o�ater edgej sfi�ruld tae 12' deep x 1' wide vr the depth re�quireci by local code for a fovt�ng and anchar bolt pl�cement. The entryfexi� ramp shos�ld be 4' deep and 12' vnde. S �� -1r a' , +a• � rima ' cnarnRr �i7[ ,�]P � w � s"� G' rlVf.RPQ�UR s�tv c�awr� i�'1� �� . sa"xi�' roat� rc�a �aG+u cc�pEs1 sr► rmrrs ►ao w�et+ue ��LIMs. 7 CY'!'MMf �fl�� :A1L 1/' I %Cla° VIt� I�E0.L"� iT -c� .... .r..w �[x ��.�t v:.;r�G flOD[ . �, •; •,�t �I� � � ; `� 4 6" !- FIY Y-0" { � � !/% % � r�ar�ta ��t�, t�r r.�r..�`ui. +.�•�r .r�.a�... wi �.t. r ^+w [• ur [+�. � �;.1��+� 4 :i r�0.�Fi�i[ 1k. i�b Yi.-;. . . � y� +. � . a � . � � � _ � �� .� � � 4;AI� A � �. �C'e� 1 �. . �04ITl�C ilt6i" '[L- +. . . olll i'i� �Br. r �. +,1 �'..: 5 ..ti .. " 1F111W 2rf��y l:C �iYlr..• .� ` .��+�- RECESSE❑ SLAB IJSE Tli'E 3�0'X30' SLA6 EC3GIES ,45 THE BASIS C7F YOUR MEASUREMEfjJT. Ev�EASUFiE 13' C]FF �ACK EDGE OF SLAB AND 13' L7F� LEFT E[�GE C]F SLAB TC] QBTAIf�Y TFiE CEMTER MARK FC]R THE 18' 3" D9AMETER AREA THAT SHOULD 8E RECE55ED SY 5' 7I8" . THEN INCLUDE THE RECE55 FC]R THE MCJT4R I�l THE BACYS LEFT THAT MEASURES 3' 4" WI�E 8Y 3` 6' DEEP, RLSG C�NSI�ER �RRINAGE REQUIREMEhJTS. 4 � Fl F1IATIC]M A sn�nwswo cuoouaeL wawn: 1g' pIhMF �CA 4RR[3lJ5EL �.1IX1N1F0 ,^.M TFE FLC9R. �T WILL 9E CEHfERED 1]' OFF 71VE 30.Ck 3LRB f�0'IANO 13 3�fLE6iGtApipp wl—Ilp 9VfR5�ehflN'�MP. [R 1iTLILN6 k AECESlEO AREA FQk CNGIXIEI: �P6LX�C� SWE 3[i'%3tl •!'3' �WAEiERAE�ES£M! FOu4�Oh ilflPl L}iR' CFFP GOR CNiOWSFI Ylll3 nroroR ` i �� i �',�� EL�VAtIQN Q� � I — I�,�.p�' �I t]:�.n ,,.. � �� C�,��i � 4 .. G. . � 25-.J - ��--_-�--=--------�-----= I �I � �sr, n I ► F L�O R P LAN ��E��M � ELEGTRICAL LDAQ� L�:if)H b(]1{jY{ BlJILC3ING LDAf� CALCULATI�NS 1. Circuit C]rte =17.'5 amp LE� lighting �onsist4ng af7 �xtures. 2.0 amps p�r fixture x i lights -14.0 amps Cameras �5}. tablet (1}. computers �ly ,[]5 per charging unit x 7= 3.5 amps 2. Circuit iw� � 15.0 am�a LE� lighting cansisting of 7 fixtu�res. 2.[� amps per fixture x 7 lights =14.0 amps 1 Fan =1.�D amps CIRCUITS F�R STLJDIa 3 [Three} Dedicated circuits 115� 25amp br�ak�rs 10 GA wires PLACEMENi 4" x 4" �unctian f�ax lQcated autside studio strueture la' abaUe the f�c�or near cr�ntrol panel 3.Circuifi Three =14.6 arrrp Power entry daor �onsisting ofi 1 door. 3.8 am� fLaadJ Ca�ousel matar consist of one 3�4 hp 115� 1 PH Mlotor N� (Na Load� = 8.4 amp � {Loadj =10.8 amp 5U (Startup) =16.2 amp Location 103 Sandberg RD Monticello, MN 55362 The intended location for the building is next to our detail center/car wash across the street from our main dealership lot (1001 MN-25, Monticello MN 55362). To make room for the studio, we will remove the dumpster enclosure in the proposed location. We have two options on handling the garbage going forward. The first option would be to move the dumpster a% mile away to where we have a parking lot leased where we store some of our vehicles. The address of that location is 3939 Chelsea Rd W, Monticello, MN 55362. We would take a van to the dumpster whenever needed. The second option would be to move the dumpster directly to the north of the studio building. We are also planning on rotating the orientation of the small, white storage shed 90 degrees to align with the side of the photo studio. . ��. �� 4 - �'- � `� f;`+ � o}. .. �� '._.�.�.,7 iin 4 ��{'�� . � � ri, ' ' . � �*x � , � I� ` � � + [ � � ''' _� i i `:Sti' � 4�,, * .� r. � �• _ � ,�� . •t � ��;I I _ �� '�'�Y . _ � � cf C �i .,. � � ,r � . t- � � s�� ¢�; _ ,� �' � — � ; � � � � i� �,,�•: - �j� w� ��n`��:a ' . _ -� i k �� rs — �l ��- �;� �,�,�� ° _ r �`w' � � � � � �. ,�� p ,�� ~� a� � � ��r�� ' r � � ��="� �`,;�= �� . � — �� + � � � ' � � � �� . '�� ^ � � i �';� � � , ��a � . � � � �� . A� r. ' � � � _ � a, � 5,. :',�. `. .. `�. . �� _:�.. Y '� �� . f„� _•�� Photos The new photo studio will allow us to upload photos to our inventory instantly. It will also allow us to offer our customers an interactive 360° view of the exterior and interior of the vehicle. See an example here: https://dealermade.com/vehicles/used-2019-blue-tovota-4runner-4d- sport-utility-trd-pro-black-�raphite-20055a r�.- _ ��. ` __ Q � � � a �� V � � � � �� ~I Mt ` �' ''�.� '� �' k' � � ? � �� q� #� o�, � � o ,� ,� < ab ,� � �; � � � � s �� ' � �� a o �y �a � � a �"' � � � � �� 0 �' � � � �� £�+�ff 9A '° ---- - ��'T__,..'_ __—__—__ '— 9� s� `` '`� • o �� $.�TdI?1Q ,� �o� � k;�. �° g � _ _ Zf"LL M „6fJ,F O S .' '3 � scx a`+� � � 9 9 � °� � —� - - � � -- _ ----- tia �1� f � a � ,' � e r � , � ,„ � U / g� SSfi � / . r� � � ~ r(`V ,l� � / ' [Sc � F � � V �C�`�� '1� `$` / � � ' : � � � � � g a � 3 �i � �~ r � i/ � '�'� a `� � � � � �� 4' � � «f � � '�� x �e z'o 1 �p4e� g6 ' � � �R ' < r �- A� �f w � < � ,� a � m4 1A �1 �P < _ a � a � � � i� - � m a . � I � "" - U A `� fy 9�'i °� � � � � � � 1;L`I.f N " � �� f l!Y'9L 'K ,'y�a 6''�h , �' �p . V� ` 4b*��'/�� '� �� 6L� �a �' `� 9S'F � � � � h A � h ti � n � y i 5 m �� 4 ab��i' � '' n �� h b�ti a � � ^ m A e y � � V � E" °� 3 4 ! ;i�R: � � �i; . f� �,, �' � �,�:: �. : '.i`'� _j'�f ��. � � �` M�$'" . �' � - �•. .F T ��s � ��Y # t �� t, � + � { ��' �,�� • C' . - �1 � , 4i; .� ��,'�.°cu. ., 7 - • '� � '�•'! � r , fi� ;�' " , ie �•.�':� , ,' �s' ;�' s� � .'�r�+. y . �,-. �. � �+r 7r, w��.: v � � �� `'� V 1 '��M � .. I� . . .�� .• I i �� .� . � 1 . , F' �� . , ' i � . _ " i . ' - - 4 .'�. . ' . . ' . . •�'s ?�•�;. v. - �c. ._ s• .�' { tr�;•. '.. , , . �u4 . . . -'. , '� F ` ".. �I � e � ;: � , � •, R � . � , , ?�•� : , , f, , a : � .« � ;f.� . .� •. ' `,r, y�' � � . 'u •'�� , r4 , r e'. - i' .�. , rr' � y J�� , . '� .. . � . t ,�i.[��a. :4 � ._� '�;: k . '� `� h � t ^'�`� [ Y �` J � . 4 � ...'y �, .f. 2 r f h ' ' . . � � � � �.� � � _ � ll . k :s{ . . � 4* � u6�y:.i�. � - ' 1 �-- , 7��" ' ' C Y . � . i . ' n . 7} � �if ti�'{� �'�< � �� • � 1 , ,�. . i �.y. , }'. - . . • ' � ` t .�q,�' � � }{ �] � �� P,tL ,� r� ��. p � � � � s � •t ,p� } � �y� � - )yr ' ��l-�� 4 h .M t�+ � ' � S, , A 1� � T� `� � ' 1 y �d '�" i ' � 1 t ti' � '4� 3 it � 'i � � . �;. � � Ln z ,y ' S � ' . ` 4 . :.. � -.: + `1� " �ti�e J r A . �p� .y'� x` �. y .'` � ti>. r � � . �. 3' � i� � r ; � �� d �� 4;,fi� � ` ` t� u � �.1Y�� w w�� : ` � � . :t: � �'f.. . � �n'i''.� � .':� n 4 4, � 1. 7 ! . �3� � .�l ��'��! :,� v � : ° ` ` : x t' � r � � ' i , " . � E �. � . 5 � � � y 4,:� i�,��' ` '. �� ' � � � sY ` , �i, � } 1 � � � t . . � � �Y y S j �J. � .i� � 4 +� ''1 � � 4 �� ' i ;. . �: . �� .,. ��j, 3 �� , � �.' , � .3 � . • � � . ; , 4 � ..w � � i � ` y r, + f >'.. �f :e L' �" r�q ��. 3{' 6 ,� Y � 5. i y, ,� ,`� `' ,.1� � F r � � ,`� °: � ,; . .�,� r l � J' �� ..' r N., �. 4 i t' .y . i,; ,`; p �a� ' ` r.� � f � •1 �; s ' , � � a,. . � 4 ` x , Y t � 3•ry E y Kry� ��. }� S i y�_ � d� .�,pi 5� �t ;y~ 1,.4 �' f� �. tl z} � . `` ` i�;p E �. ;! S . �, i i r' � �.i � � ' , 1, .F i, t '4,� : t�, r. . � ��y � �:.; ti �� ' � f�' e , c4 � � � `�i. 4'; ' �3r�rot��R�� (.� k.. � � . �' . :f �,�,. . . Yi i °�� ` . ,. 4� y�; � I!. �: . � � ..--n .r. . .+I , :,*^� , � "�� ,� ��: . ` r �,. , t�. �Yh.. i. M VP� � � ? . i°4 �� ^i^� 1. . . .M:.. � h�f ��'�n �,� � y-� 5 f � 3��C�? '•�,r� � ��` .._ ,� -�� M � � �,� � . . .`�.�:.`�_. : t"� ..� ,. a' � � 5� �1 �- , C,; Ia;, f CC' . i.. 1� i 'y'°!. � ' '', • `: •-y' ` tR'; , •.. ' � � a.` , ` , �, t ;'_ �` ,�". + �; � 4. ,_ y �i' �A . � . ;�.; �Y:.� � . . . f�� i._� y f� y` `� { �r �`: ' w.'ti��r . p � � . . . ., � R 1 �. ! � . ; �. ` � . . � t � �'�4 ,i.Y,� . ` aC � } 1'. : "'� 1` y �.ep ' $Si'f'tl„ k .. ' a � f ��'�- . � � '�� r � - � � y ' { � L��i. �:i �:� '�� ,_ ^r� � �. � . bf o n,� e! r9L2f' !�'€ ,� Y ' F r ��, ' Y} f_;� k' ��,:� d Y��' i ? ,;�,m ,.Y , �i�^?g� '"�� "� ��`�'',�.'� • � a fi �y � r .� , r�,�. � - �' ` �:` y a -:� � a�+�zar,•_. . � y' ,_ � '� x,, �.:�.. .� � ��= a � yh�" �. ��e r"_ ;. ' n"- E � .'; � � 05 e { ��t �� #� ;.�� - y�'- ' J �fM � a..1��/""��W+♦} Y �Y' �� l�+ 1,� A �� 5 pk�y �[��y, �� ab�!7r i . P . +F" � �� ' rr � - , T . . , - ' f � `{, , . . . . . . �; ; w +.>4 � s�� }, ,� °;a � � � � . w t} . :: �:� � � .� . , , , ,; . $ :� ..,: , � t � ; f , �r. � �.� �,,� �' ��.� �� , . . ' � qY+y � i�C �1� !, h w�, f� �y3'Ty� ix � � �'"' � e,d'� `'�wt �: '`'� � 4 �}f � k .1i F�a� �h.�}+ `a .S. . . . i�.i�.t��4 � .. �`}� �ya Y'� k -, y s � - r'a � b ` � q'lk ��;s: � xo a `i� �.` f �. 5� fti L-c�{"�� iM,��• d :` �; �+ a t.`,. , . "j'1 1 S � Y,�h � 1 G�' +f' 9: . � V.f°� ;�l i .�_,�, �`f9'4 il �;.9 ;. . . 1�f, ry .y�i?'Pi�k•�... . . j��* �� '�, �*� ii t � ` . . , h �P�� ' ;� ; �: ,�. � ' ' , . `� � .. ,x , ' S�'�_ � . ! ". 1 . .�.! . � 1 �;' , _y� ��;._ . ; ss , � ,. .lw� . � _ b � � .� � �' �a . ,� �kA: j � � �G` . i � `� -} � i, �Z,i � TM�� . , . . , � �'� �,s'��H�'^r� . � . � .. . .. . .t :l � �. �� s i -t i � . 6, , , . ��y: , ;� ,+�: ' \ � u ` t 1 � ` 7, . � e: M � � A ,��'sP�}�+�� t E� , .�� s � Z 4 � � .. � �e h� ++5 t � � �I y.� . :1 lA . ro . �n. . � , . �}. . ,7^, �.. � � :r'(�+C ii '� �' � �. � 4 , � ��`` J.: � ,4 A F�^ {� ��^��t� � � 9 +�r. � �..' `+..• � _�.A ` ft `t�� "}��.�,��, t. ��'�"� v � /�� !.- + } � "�`4.�, rF�-'t�* 4� �` f � / �4 �ti , ,[ t <.&",4 'tt4y� L ��L:�4 �'�� p� .. '4 � { �.. . � ! . ,.: y r '{. l'�� }CE�r , � ` �I .� j. ,�( � . +[ v'�4 [ � .' 4 . �ys� � { . . ' ...-'. +-4� {' a � S } �� F �' ~ �� . �� w ¢� � ��J�� '� LF� ,1�:, .� f � . � � k , �, � ��, ca` . E F '�� 4 :Qa � . .�%j � r� `� . ,. -�r � � � R +, � 4 1f f' l i � ' �lr !r�'t R j ��. �.. 1 ��_�. � . , � � � � d .n, . .,, . � . }'�. . e' � r.Y .� ; . ., ,� , . •... ��.� ` , 1 �"Mz��. �_� . /�, J<,� "- . 4 �t� . Y e t � 4 a� '� �'. . � � � . .. � y �r,, � . _ i' '► �� ,� 4� i� ,'�• -- ' � �.y�'� ''�. .�'�'��h � S�.'r�- r � � � .. '�1 �`�� + ,n! �t a,f . :+ . + I 1'> $ . �S Y� ,'i t ��+�'° f 1 4 r't {�� . � � 6r ` . �. � �� ' f I'. I ' � 1' 'i ' � X. ' �`� �z „y:.' � � M.' i{. �" �.. _ r � �'ti' � �• ". i : � � � 4,�; i _h� �, T � �' . . : . - ----`." _ /,� 1' r r ;! ' Y K - `� . KS,. }�•"'�,y� A�y�� . . . �. `�i 1f- �r - � �' .1 K � � - V w � t . �. ..'_ � , j ' . _ .. � - +�.5,�.�w- ,� . ..� f._x'V . �..... ... .R�-�_ �� ' , i . ; f 't �._ s"e .`_� Y . � . . - _ - 4 _"�,'#r _ "'" 1 .y d � �`, 4, 1� • � '� -- � �� '.� �� i,tS. `� . . . e . . . '. . � ,.. b` . � : �. t: . . � .. 1'' y� J � . . - � v l �. ; .-. � �- . � ] . - �. -� '— _ � • �;� ' _ , �_��'�� , � `;` � - j - � � f � � - '�".�, * �� _ ��,; . —�.'�� - � . _ , , � �� ; � � `� ,' ,�� :, ,, , . n , ..,:• "! - �"�.�y 4 ' �-�+� , +,,r'� ' � � , • • � - �. --� � � � # 1y . , y `� ��y� , � � � j . _ — = '�I� — � _ L Y . _ .r �I , � �._ �� ' �. . �� . -� . . . , �` �' ' � . _ --; �• � �` Y,p �k.� .. �� . , . ;�. ,: a, � 1 � �� t� . d�. �'��'.��. - -�-a..�.�. � �. ,i 4 t.: `� ' � , '.;;' .', + � f �.�s , � "� � _ ` 1 � , r _ 1, ��ii� � 4 �� k vi 4 � � ¢ } �� r - 7 '� "�" ? ' � j f S 't � , . 9,� �j �� 9� � r -'-� ��. � , �. £ � .' �.� �: � .w _ - . . " � ` 1 � k '. �, �F.. ,, � �ar � <_ � '� •` '` � � � ^ � ' � `i ' Y -. � ' ` 1. ` � � � ��\ ! ;�� S ! l � �� F i ��y� � '�r�'' �� . . ti � � � I ' .. T � �' �a 4 ti ri i �\ ��`v � q'y. �- 'i _- —__ _ . . � � '. 5. �. "� � � i � � � . . � . ' . .! ��>. . �� '�y'�,.�. 4 • . _ _-.- � �. . • 4Tr h - C�`� �''4��: � 1 S`: '" F f � .,i ~ ��'y �. _ rr � T { .�,,iv� . • . 4 "�`�40��k : �= � �I� `.ty ., "�� '"4. � .- ._..- --- — '"' --� �- - . . , . . V��,�,��' �,+. .. � ' � .. � -� j . . y`— . � . - ' . , ,. ,� . 'S � .� �.... ��"� ` <.�...� „ � ' � � � . . . . � �. . .� , . ,` + . q �•{� �� 1 .1. � . � ... � ,�- � .s, — . . , n..��<�: �� ; , ' r , { ,e �.,�. - , �� w J r� � � � f - "• � � +; � i k �' �I i@", :.�. Y� �!• _ �6�' ut�".; _ +� � � �� ''t �--� �k�>+i� � � 1 r _ � �.. .'iw - Y'�:r, . ��: �r; �� t �;�=__ ._; p a'`w � - - "+e+a:.. ..r .:.. - � . � �'� �� -. � +�l ^„ ' ' .,. ��.��- F �' _ - .�,- `' � . . . .. .t •._� ., a: � � �` � . *�, ,� ;� . � ,rr �� . , . : �;.. :;,� _ t,: � �..,� - , . ,, �. ; ... . e� -„a _ - � i s ,�,,� . _ , y z � y'�. � . � . � �� y�^ � '��^` .d+ r, � .. � _�'�i.ti� � i.t � `�� . -,`f,p,� �-�.- Y �c��i .. � � ��... 4 �' � �v �y o^ "'�'`�iY�� i�"•°� !��C' ti } ^._ W 1�� G-ti,�y�s} +�!��r� �,," ,� b^� +�•rA�,,, a- � f ', �, �'�'r � Y"�� r ,� ... r �-- rs +�� t � ' :#..., - ��i�� r }J9�Ah � , � � ��,. .. , Fr� ,: t'� b • +,�. ' � - x - ` �` ; .k ..�.s,. �aM � 3�t= . e �a r,-, 1� r e� ��1��71� , .,�� ; `y . R r y � �;� ;€,�'�,q� `�` a..;� , � �� u �, .� ;�. , � ` 4.. ��+ ��r,��.,�",, _ . �r ,� r`� , ;. „ k �� y�z � -.. :�4'�� E , ��j i '�' '�, ;`r�f $� �• `'+� � T."'�'�, +a ' '1��.. - � `'��ti j+�, > '� } '� �- � ��k"�'' � �� ."�I � '�S: t `� � ��MF� � �� µ�� s �;e .J� � �fl� �� s ,a 4 � �y�,,'�t� � � F, k+ ,�:. �:t,`: "�.�3R��, ��` ; . ! _ ,� . x "1' , _g�,sa .� `�' �i ;° f . � ��fy �P.� i�{��, R +•"f'� �� .�1 ,...•S • �� .,� ti`.� +t i•� � t �. :-�T� �� r y-; y d'9' ,y ° � � Oi. - 2y t � . � h" � �".�i ��n '�'� r4t ° �, t. . . ��: , .�� . � ;r 4,� , . . �„ , ; �� ;�, ' �` �� . �-" _ �� =� �. � � � - „ a x; 9� � d��"�J=e� r�i�� ,a '� �." � E �T�i � .�}+ `i � 1 .t {��{1 , 'S 'C 'j' � y" 1 .rs� t p� l � `, 3' ( i' '' ` ,{'��} �F"'.fi s i y`y � ',r,�� it �.,.� . . s Y � r .� - ^ f'f � wv'YR� > �� r , �' '�* i +$--� • x � 1 0 y . �� itrr� �` f �Oir #.Z �� '��`�{ '�S� 4. �- wD k e� �,. �, f�yi. .'�z y6' �'� r i�'` ; 1; � ��,� asi �!'� ��tp .. __�'k� :b'!�.'�WAn,ir,.. �. � . .. �''�.� �: .. - t_:_ � : _ . R5'�.a� ti� :n . ... . �� 1 �; ..,� �r{`' �, � h� , � � �. � , � � � �� , � �� Vl? �F. �.w 'L � B�I� _. - .; � o- � . .._ Y:iiL9k�c�3a:2r. .� . , __ . . �`�rr..*�t, ., �".34 .,ax ��°R��.a..-� .t.i.' Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 2C. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Repuest for Amendment to Planned Unit Development for the Removal of a Required Fence & Conversion of Self-Stora�e Space into an Office Use Accessorv to the Self-Stora�e Use Applicant: Keith Burnham, Affordable Stora�e. (NAC) Property: Planning Case Number: Legal: 3936 Chelsea Road West Lot 11, Block 4, Groveland Addition 2020-024 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: PUD Amendment to previously approved Planned Unit Development December 9, 2020 Places to Shop B-3, Highway Business District NA Self — Storage (under development) Mixed Use — Commercial Vacant/Commercial Single Family Residential Vacant Commercial Project Description: The applicant received a PUD approval in the summer of 2017, with a phasing plan and approval for certain delayed site improvements, including fencing, building materials, and paving, among others. The applicant then received an Adjustment to the PUD to accelerate the phasing of the approved buildings, and delay fencing and final landscaping improvements until construction on Phases 2 and 3 are complete. In this proposed PUD Amendment, the applicant is seeking removal of the fence from the site/landscape plan, and the addition of an on-site office location in the first building, which had originally contained only an unstaffed entry lobby. Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 ANALYSIS The City Council approved the Development Stage PUD for the self-storage proj ect in August of 2017, with a series of conditions as adopted by the Planning Commission. The Adjustment was approved by the City Council in September of 2018. The PUD Adjustment made no real substantive changes to the PUD, however, dates specified for completion of the fencing and landscaping were moved from September 15th of 2018 to September 15th of 2020. The original dates were established as phasing of the buildings was initially expected to take several years, and the site amenities were considered important to establish and maintain an attractive site while much of the building area stood vacant pending construction. The Adjustment acknowledged that construction of the buildings was on a significantly faster track, and holding final site landscaping and fencing until near completion was reasonable to avoid construction conflicts. It is common that such amenity improvements are among that last phases of site construction. Fencin�. The current PUD Amendment asks for removal of the fence condition altogether. The applicant argues that the fences applied to other properties in the area suffer from collision and damage, in turn defeating the aesthetic purpose they are intended to serve. For Affordable Storage, the fence was an aesthetic addition to the site, rather than a security provision — the applicant suggested at the time that security would not be an issue, and has reiterated that position with this new application. As such, the question for the Planning Commission and City Council is whether the aesthetic aspect of the fence was a key component in approving the PUD, essentially a site planning improvement that weighted the proj ect toward meeting the requirement for enhanced site and building design in exchange for the flexibility otherwise provided by PUD zoning. The fence was designed as a"wrought iron" design between masonry pillars every 100 feet along the Innsbrook and Chelsea Road frontages. The fence was intended to supplement the proposed landscaping in screening the self-storage buildings' visual impact from the street. In substitute for the fence, the applicant has redesigned the landscape plan to add a 2- foot tall natural boulder wall along the majority of the Chelsea Road frontage. This wall would support the landscape plantings above the wall, adjacent to the drive aisles, and permit the flattening of the area adj acent to the current pathway, replacing a sloped and mulched area with a more level sodded grass area. In this way, the applicant suggests that the wall replaces the "structural" element previously created by the fence and pillars, and results in a more attractive and maintainable landscape, both above and below the wall. 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 In addition to the boulder wall, the applicant is proposing to add ornamental boulders to a portion of the landscaped area, and 6 additional spruce trees along the common boundary with the RVi center, creating a more recognizable edge between the two properties. Landscape/Groundcover. The applicant also requests a slight adjustment in the ground cover portion of the landscaping along the western boundary shared with the RVi center. On the RV side of the shared property line, the City approved a rock mulch cover, based on the applicant's request that plant materials would be difficult to maintain in this area as RV units extended over the area. In this application, Affordable Storage is requesting a similar treatment, replacing the previously approved sod with rock mulch to match the RV ground treatment. Office Space. The final aspect of the Amendment is to remodel a portion of the initial entry building to add a staffed office space. This request was based on the applicant's experience with this and other installations. Clarifying that the office space is used as an administrative area for the Affordable Storage use (rather than a leased office to a non-affiliated business), there would be no issues with this change. Such offices are common to these businesses, and a small parking area has already been made a component of the site improvements. It is noted that the applicant will need to work with the City to provide appropriate utility services to such a space. The Conditions of Approval would change as follows: 1. Redesign of the site plan to accommodate 24 feet of width for all drive aisles. 2. Provision for pavement markings and bollards in the center aisle area to ensure protection of building corners due to the curved aisle design. 3. Rock mulch in the planting areas to be larger irregular materials to protect pathway. 4. Transition grading between phases. 5. No outdoor storage permitted. 6. No use of future phase areas until such phase is developed in accordance with the approved plan. 7. Provide signage plans in compliance with Sign Ordinance requirements by separate permit. 8. Site lighting in compliance with City ordinances. 9. Compliance with City Engineer's report dated July Sth, 2017. 10. Execution of development agreement. 11. Grading and restoration of the site to be completed with first phase. 12. Utilities, including curb and gutter, completed for Phases 1 and 2 with the first phase of development. 13. The fence, as proposed at the August 2017 Planning Commission meeting, would be deleted and replaced with the improvements shown on the landscapin� plan dated 8/10/20, includin� the 2-foot tall boulder wall and other additions Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 � �� D'�� ,��' �'��T-�� ;� *'�� r'�� In the alternative, the Commission may require a reduced fencing component, concentrating on the corners of the site in question. 14. Building elevations and materials for buildings facing Chelsea Road and Innsbrook Drive shall be as shown in the Planning Commission packet of August 1, 2017, and building elevations revised to clearly detail material and facades for all building within the proj ect. 15. �e Approval of the landscaping plan dated 8/10/20 to �"��*r�*� *'�� „r�„��' � include a timeline for landscaping � cor�o,,,�.o,- � c� �n� Q�,- ��,o �..,�.,,,,.o „��,o ,ao..o�„r,,,o„� ,- as required bV CitV > > � Council resolution. 16. Site ��'� plan subject to the City Engineer's comments and those of the Fire Department as related to the northerly access. 17. Modifvin� the ori�inal landscapin� plans to replace sod with rock mulch alon� the westerlv common boundarv with the RVi center as illustrated on the landscape plans dated 8/10/20. Staff believes that the request is reasonable, and consistent with the original intent of the PUD, with the noted change to the fence construction. As an alternative, the Commission could consider removing the bulk of the fencing from the Innsbrook and Chelsea frontages, but retaining sections as aesthetic enhancements to the landscape, particularly at the proj ect corners. At the time of the initial PUD approval, it was believed that enclosing the site with fence and landscaping would leave a more ordered looking and secure site. Modification of these improvements should be considered in view of the interest in ensuring that PUD development includes sufficient amenities to justify flexibility from zoning requirements in other areas. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS L Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC-2020-025, approving an Amendment to the PUD for Affordable Storage, subj ect to the amended conditions in Exhibit Z, including amending the fence condition to delete the fence and replace with the improvements shown on the landscaping plan dated 8/10/20, including the 2-foot tall boulder wall and other additions. (Alternative: Adopt Resolution No. PC-2020-025, approving an Amendment to the PUD for Affordable Storage, subject to the amended conditions in Exhibit Z, including amending the fence condition to require a reduced fencing component, concentrating on the corners of the site in question utilizing the prior approved fence and post material design.) 0 Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. PC-2020-025, based on findings to be adopted and identified by the Planning Commission following the public hearing. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution, subj ect to additional information from applicant and/or staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Resolution as noted in Alternative 1, modifying conditions with the details relating to the fencing and landscaping, and adding a condition related to improvements and use of the office space. It should be noted that at present, the applicant is in conformance with the other prior approved conditions of the PUD. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2020-025 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Revised Site Plan, dated 8/10/20 E. Revised Landscaping Plan, dated 8/10/20 F. Revised Grading Plan, dated 8/10/20 G. Approved Site Plan H. Approved Landscaping Plan I. Approved Fence Design Z. Revised Conditions of Approval 5 Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 EXHIBIT Z Affordable Storage PUD Adjustment 3936 Chelsea Road West Lot 11, Block 4, Groveland Addition 1. Redesign of the site plan to accommodate 24 feet of width for all drive aisles. 2. Provision for pavement markings and bollards in the center aisle area to ensure protection of building corners due to the curved aisle design. 3. Rock mulch in the planting areas to be larger irregular materials to protect pathway. 4. Transition grading between phases. 5. No outdoor storage permitted. 6. No use of future phase areas until such phase is developed in accordance with the approved plan. 7. Provide signage plans in compliance with Sign Ordinance requirements by separate permit. 8. Site lighting in compliance with City ordinances. 9. Compliance with City Engineer's report dated July Sth, 2017. 10. Execution of development agreement. 11. Grading and restoration of the site to be completed with first phase. 12. Utilities, including curb and gutter, completed for Phases 1 and 2 with the first phase of development. 13. The fence, as proposed at the August 2017 Planning Commission meeting, would be deleted and replaced with the improvements shown on the landscapin� plan dated 8/10/20, includin� the 2-foot tall boulder wall and other additions �g , �, ''� . In the alternative, the Commission may require a reduced fencing component, concentrating on the corners of the site in question, utilizing the prior approved fence and post design. 14. Building elevations and materials for buildings facing Chelsea Road and Innsbrook Drive shall be as shown in the Planning Commission packet of August 1, 2017, and building elevations revised to clearly detail material and facades for all building within the project. 0 Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/2020 15. �e Approval of the landscaping plan dated 8/10/20 to ' � include a timeline for landscaping �^r D�,^�o ,;� �rr;�,. ''n, 4^�,a � cor�o,,,�.o,- � c� �n� Q�,- ��,o �..,�.,,,,.o „��,o ,ao..o�„r,,,o„� ,- as required by City > > � Council resolution. 16. Site �� plan subject to the City Engineer's comments and those of the Fire Department as related to the northerly access. 17. Modifvin� the ori�inal landscapin� plans to replace sod with rock mulch alon� the westerlv common boundarv with the RVi center as illustrated on the landscape plans dated 8/10/20. 18. The developer shall enter into an a�reement for the PUD Amendment. 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-025 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE AFFORDABLE STORAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVISING THE SITE, USE, AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AFFORDABLE STORAGE PUD ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to revise certain aspects of an existing self-storage proj ect, including the addition of a staffed office, additions to the landscaping, and modifications or removal of an approved fence; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development, and is subject to a previously approved Planned Unit Development ordinance; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Places to Shop" for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided updated plans illustrating the changes dated 8/10/20; and WHEREAS, the uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the underlying zoning district; and WHEREAS, the uses will not create any unanticipated changes to the demand for public services on or around the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September lst, 2020 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the Affordable Storage PUD Zoning District. 2. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-025 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The plan amendments meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, subj ect to the fle�bility granted under the PUD and the conditions attached to this PUD Amendment. Changes to utility services are expected to have no unanticipated impacts on public utilities or other services as a result of the proposed amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Planned Unit Development Amendment for Affordable Storage, subj ect to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Redesign of the site plan to accommodate 24 feet of width for all drive aisles. 2. Provision for pavement markings and bollards in the center aisle area to ensure protection of building corners due to the curved aisle design. 3. Rock mulch in the planting areas to be larger irregular materials to protect pathway. 4. Transition grading between phases. 5. No outdoor storage permitted. 6. No use of future phase areas until such phase is developed in accordance with the approved plan. 7. Provide signage plans in compliance with Sign Ordinance requirements by separate permit. 8. Site lighting in compliance with City ordinances. 9. Compliance with City Engineer's report dated July Sth, 2017. 10. Execution of development agreement. 11. Grading and restoration of the site to be completed with first phase. 12. Utilities, including curb and gutter, completed for Phases 1 and 2 with the first phase of development. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-025 13. The fence, as proposed at the August 2017 Planning Commission meeting, the fencing would be deleted and replaced with the improvements shown on the landscapin� plan dated 8/10/20, includin� the 2-foot tall boulder wall and other additions. In the alternative, the Commission mav require a reduced fencin� component, concentratin� on the corners of the site in question. 14. Building elevations and materials for buildings facing Chelsea Road and Innsbrook Drive shall be as shown in the Planning Commission packet of August 1, 2017, and building elevations revised to clearly detail material and facades for all building within the project. 15. Approval of the landscaping plan dated 8/10/20 to include a timeline for landscaping as required bv Citv Council resolution. 16. Site and fencing plan subject to the City Engineer's comments and those of the Fire Department as related to the northerly access. 17. Modifvin� the ori�inal landscapin� plans to replace sod with rock mulch alon� the westerlv common boundarv with the RVi center as illustrated on the landscape plans dated 8/10/20. 18. The developer shall enter into an a�reement for the PUD Amendment. ADOPTED this lst day of September, 2020 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING CONINIISSION : ATTEST: Sam Murdoff, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director O � � � U � � ++r� � � �,/ r�`ry-�rp��l� K�y�* �� •�� !� C - ' � '1''�_ +D�'� • �v, `� L.�'�'� - '�i,_� Y '�1iH l- � ' _ - �' . , a�.,Y. " ,r `�kww ,�: � .:�J I t ^° r � ; � � � .� — , ° � . . ' � � i r ��'�" � � r � xt � .; ,,.,,,� � U � .�y, � . � �� ,ty . . '+i+ir�Nr,r,�1 � �f .. S� � f ¢: nt ., !R: � � � � J' � �. ,�- ��►,. , .,�, ., 6, � �i .; � : ,, ' E ' Ki � rtf� � � ' [7 1 � . QL� ��3�Q��S ' is �x �crv-., a �!�'� � �a�e�, n��, ' , . i . � ' r !�lY c � ' W ; . v w+�.�..a ; � rr , r.' --- � .. .;�� _ � -_ : * � . � � ; .. � _ � . � � ��. __ � �- - ., . .. v = ' � ' � � � 1 � �� . . , _ r y��`_��.�. � � (��, .�,� . �r�~ �� ,� � � � ,� � ..� �'� , '� i � 7e�'1 �f oi['•��' `S' � � ,iyetV C7 �' � '� .�r, �r�i.3+°`�,_ `- � . �' � �y�^ . j� ' . . � �� -, �� .. - �,�...�.. � � �, •� � � • , .. � ; . ,.�.__ � MARVIN�R� . _,.. - : o -- 00 - N— N J �ry r �, 0., `} - M � �' � � � F r �' ¢ �ry � ��'I� �,� � , �--+ r � � rr' Y� • .,�i � � � -• � � �:r,u"''f irn'I � � p � � � � � 1� C 6= ` � � I �— , . � ` . ^Ll � �..._ � � �,� � � ��, ^ ^, f— � [}11 'i!i ..f_a- f �.� �, y ��. 1 L �� !� O > � � — •L � r.�, � ' - 1 > � �-- a �L� - � � . � O � � . � � . , gn `a_ . � rr Q , � ,_�-} p � 3 ° k � �.: ,� � � � � � � . �, � � : � - ` � � ' `, `i c, - � �. ,r� � � � � , - ,� `� , ., _ �t . J 4� � ` /� . , � r-I � �� L�" + � � � 1'�'� � � � . � '' �� ' , " � , .� ;i `� u? � � R f � + r, � .. � �, c� � o�, -� ,;i{l,, � ,s �:n Z � GEd . ;t. . P . a �, � ��. �� , {� � �,- . �� p,.a � �: ,� C . � �� o � �'. � � � � �" e �+ . m ;!J � l,(} lCr. 1 f �.�r^ - [ •. �--� � 'P ;� � ' �� i� T ;�� . � `9 '_ � - i - �--� � , r - u'3Y � .� , �' • �r - ' � ; � � ' �� r�- � * .' a ��` ¢ � � i uM7�a .� f '- �� E� , � � .�. � � � � � .+h. . `� ' � : d'1�" . �. ,�- ��t � i , ¢ _ , � � �. / .:I : �: . � � � , � ,� � ; ,!�'__-_�.. ..u� , a t:a � i , s t � _ <��' t T � %�, � � � � ��;�. N p ". , �� i,.�; ;� , ' , ,�+ . ,,�� +� s , j�= Q � a �`�/ f r ��if + � { �f i � ::;. �P1 � 4' t ��-' C17 Q� . �� f �:�� aj..i ., \ P F'* } � . � � !( � r' �� 1 r�l� � ' � 1 .��` , �' ` �� O +' ��rf'�i� 1.� �D h ° ' � � � rt r .�- � � . j �'` r rf ,, N � a. �r�. % (V , r �i�' :, ^ !� , I � Q � �� - �r r � V � . % '►,,(�} ; x � ` �., � � '�"" Y`ik� u��7f.rl ��CI �. f�, _ f S�3 �j. � � � � � 'ri -w � � F � � 6' a � ,�� ,. � ruQs � r- .'� ` • � ' f . � � Q` �f` . '�' � � ' � •• f+ � f t L�1 . � Y � C6 0 °`� � �'u�,�� ' i`�rr . � i . ` �,� � � �, �_ . � _ ;: ' � I `'" �' � � �s'? I ' , �r � Q �' �' 4 O � '� . � r j �/� �,. �,;� ' . � � C'�� . '�� i�. � 6 ��¢'� ��jv� �Y '`,� r �YY O O oaa,. .]� i ., ' • �" , �4,i'� {n ,p� � , .,, � . . �--+ 00 � '�` � � '� E { . �r � •f � Q7 � ` �F �'� ��Q� � � ' r � _ .� '� CL6 rj �j Jr.,. �.ae '. ✓ • , yi t . �Q a # „ ..., . i rl 4�n�, �j 5' .�`, � / !' ` rr � . � J �+'�� d, -� �'p�l� , �r - s � � ' . . �°� ��,� , � � + • �. � c� � av . � p� �„ i �, , � T�' . "' O � , �► ` t "' ,�, j 5'�y� �;, , � ' �,r - ,. . �-- �� U � '�`. r `:, �= � °� _ City of Monticello, Affordable Storage Monticello has been a very successful project, and the final building phasing has been completed 2 years earlier than originally anticipated. This was our first Storage Facility Project, and we have realized what works well, and what doesn't work. I made a mistake in planning for a perimeter fence, and we ask that the perimeter fence be completely removed from the plans as shown. The attached photo shows the widest portion of the property facing Chelsea Rd. The fence would be installed between the walking path and our facility, a general area where both the City and our snow contractor blows/piles snow. Looking at a similar fence on the same block, it has various sections that have been smashed in, bent, or tipped over as the result of snow. That property would look better with no fence. Further, we have demonstrated since our first building opened for rent in January 2018, that we do not have a security problem. We have been open for over two and a half years, have 390 tenants, and have had only 3 police calls. Many local gas stations or box stores have more than that in 1 week. Our site is well lit, and has security cameras placed throughout the facility, and a security gate at the front entrance. We also have a lot of natural barriers, like 2 ponds along Innsbrook Dr on both sides of our entry gate, as well as a steep slope that will be intensively landscaped between our perimeter curb and Chelsea Rd. We just received approval from the City of St. Michael for a new 10 acre storage project, and we do not have a fence. We learned from our mistakes. Removing the fence on the NW side of the project will allow us the room to plant some additional evergreen trees. That area was scheduled for sod, but we ask to change to stone mulch to tie into the RV dealers stone mulch, it will be seamless. We have added some large outcropping boulders to be placed in the landscape beds along Chelsea Rd between building 1 through 7. Because of the steep grade between building 7 through 17, we would like to add approximately 350 ft of 2' tall boulder wall to help retain the bank, and landscaping. This will also make maintenance of the new sod along the city walking path much easier due to softening the grade. Finally, we ask for your permission to have an on-site office. We are not changing the footprint of the existing building. The new office will be located in building 1 facing the parking stalls. The office will allow us to better serve our customers, and it is an added security feature. As we continue to grow, and look at additional Monticello property, we may elect to have our permanent offices elsewhere, but would like to have that option. Thank you for your consideration, Keith Burnham �uo� ruedmo�-u�Pqwnqry)qi�o; , ZNO� S6Z-E9L weywiy� �ia}� ZJESS i\'W `o��a�uuoW LL9[ x'o80J �77 �s�1,il�d�i�d S� — Of1d Z98S9 NW 'oNeopuopy 7seM peoy eesle4a 9SBS 1�3!'Otld 1N3W3AOtldW1 3115 e8e�o;S �IeS e14�P�a{!b' - -----� �,vm3 � .� �— � eococ o�^n � � "",��,��'°n�,w,`� �; - _ ��a o�� a�o- `� £�Y��`GN"� a_ � aa�W�' ¢ �No'� ��6�03 oa�' a��o<�'o - ��¢ _ ,`��w�o :��o�oa� �oa'wwwo __:�o� ¢�04 " o�` >Y`�'�o�Ga�opm �Q3 a£� `�¢ -- - - �� __ GpJ `03� � p�=-o�V aG� _ __ ��¢ ��o `Ga �`Gai<�moo� im'^��p �z�G3o��oi oe<��000N�� a_�.m��.<��a�� / �: / �Pn= '" _c�.�'n0� / // �.�� _@ OS �e a3v o �as �e aixxr T � o T � �� V �vs�rea „ g N � a — � _ W — N — J — LL Ox Nc�NN�Nwoa W a a 2 c,c,oc,c,u�c,� �� ' I O�n 0000000 00 0 Ory 0 r� . � ,/ � � � / // �� II �uo� ruedmo�-u�Pqwnqry)qi�o; , ZNO� S6Z-E9L weywiy� �ia}� ZJESS i\'W `o��a�uuoW LL9[ x'o80J �77 �s�1,il�d�i�d S� jJtl1S IVNIj - U!)d Z98S9 NW 'oNeopuopy 7seM peoy eesle4a 9SBS 1�3!'Otld 1N3W3AOtldW1 3115 e8e�o;S �IeS e14�P�a{!b' ��mm�4 �a<d3` _ 4 mc�m mc� 4 �'¢ o �nc_c__m ut_r_ .V mm X"v — -----� �,vm3 � .� �- � eococ o�^n� � "",��,��'°n�,w,`� �; OS �e a3v O I ^ as �e aixxr V � � o T � �� V �vs�rea „ g N (7 � g _ ¢ _ H - N - - J - LL - - _ x r�c�ri+��rnwoa 111 Zo00000000 oIJ � NI �a� m�i., I n�s I�os �uo� ruedmo�-u�Pqwnqry)qi�o; , ZNO� S6Z-E9L weywiy� �ia}� ZJESS i\'W `o��a�uuoW LL9[ x'o80J � 11 �03IZi1 ldO2[d C!X ' ' '_ `a� ' ' - ' '_ __-' '_ '_ o�p 0 � - H � o � `5 � ° o ��s s � �" �€. a� $ 7 ��m� °a> ° �4 — m�� N�a� m��., a�s �os jJtl1S IVNIj - U!)d Z98S9 NW 'oNeopuopy 7seM peoy eesle4a 9SBS 1�3f07id 1N3W3/�07idW1311S a6eao�S �IaS alq�pao�itl — -----� �,�„3 � � —a�z�— � eococ o�^n� � ^�� ;�� ; /� �� . �, ��.A��.. ��= � :�� . . � ?Y;+��. ' �' � , OS �e a3v � Na as �e aixxrx� ° o T � 'a`' �� I 1 a g ` / U �Vsz/ea y ` v N (7 � g _ ¢ _ H - N - - J - LL - - _ x r�c�ri+��rnwoa 111 Zc,c,oc,c,u�c,� �� t c moasa�uedmoo-unyumq�ya�ary ZSOZ'SGZ-E9G wr.4wnq y)�ay Z9£SS NLY `�[I�°U�°W LL91 xoeOd �'I'I `S�LL2I�d0?Id fl�l 3 _ a � a « �n rnnnnrr�n��r� � � � � �" a � ,g ' < g 2 99 � w a w w &m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm W a z o 6 J � F - �� ` � og�s UR � NI �:8� m°'�� 39V1S 7VNIj - 0!)d Z96S9 NW 'o��eopuo{�y �seM peoa ees�ey� 9EBE 1�3fOHd 1N3W3A07idW1 311S e8e�o3S {IeS e14EP�alIF/ k o�w� 3�a`o �40- � a - �Na�4 _ _ a.Zoo o��;o �o a o =�e_ � �w= - ��°�o� ��: N=aE�p =a ^ - �, �� pa . `��o.�m� a�=o<N� > -��' sa-�w�o -"�a - � c � 8 � 3 Y; i�� 5 � � �.��-.�r �� ¢ `� 5 '" G' � ..Y S ,��.:� d � 5 wa op' � .00 ��N�.�3n.�_...�.��.<>sar_ — — — — — — _� 'JN(YH3N!'JN3 �(NJ .� � �— .�,� � n ,: ,� e "" „ ,�, w ,�,�.� .�.w a '° ��. OS �e anrJ� OS /e � OS .ie �aN O V i << sZ ao � : _ _ ��¢ - �o . _ � pa°o � � � 's' p m a �z _ �; k� U�F N� � �pQ Q �OZQ - � �Y t � g �ap <Ea � _zQ Qa �F po� � 2o�z a� � �� ¢� m m � t'� � 5� 5 ss pz � � 3 - - ` 8n z� _ �� _ _ � � N o �� w„�8 � � _ � � � �d ? k a , W ks � " T �< a� V � s£ d�r� a �� m S _ _" _ _ N�P�Ea yOO O� e'OFO� eO�"OmO�ODO¢OO��-O-O°OOOO�O� DOo O as � z g �a Q �E ¢ gZ'� ap � Q w o� F � N J �a�� z LL �a� x ��3Gwov W Zoo��o� moo medwaaweyam9ry'�41!aX , ZSOZ-56Z-f9L wew�^s �nrax Z9E55 NW `�llauyuoy� LG9I zoff Od J71 <�`�I.L(1.1(1�C((I � L9E55 NW '�IIB�17�aW JsaM Peoa aesleUO 9&88 1�3POHd 1N3W3AOHdW1 3115 e8e�o}S �IaS 814EP�al�b' r aa.virs p- —� 'JN/II33NI�N.� LA(J :19 ¢Aviftl! — w �- �v � n-ct-� .� � �.e�r� � e � � ��b�� ; m m m m m a� a a a _ _ . _ _� - _ �rn ee _ �.,n�� _ _ r-_sa �"- $^ f'SE _ � a -- Pa -- �- _ ' _. _ _ = 4 � �_ $ _ � fi a _ _ _ _ � rc � m m � � a a o s -_ - ' Q - '_ " _ - E _ _ _ €Ev _ _ Q _ - �g _ z?v _ _ � � � � ' �Va- _ x� � - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ �8 - _ Q- - �� _ _ �E^ _ b��' _ _ - - -_- _ _ Jd c� - _ 3 _ _ - � - _ __ __ _ _ � - m u o n u x n �n � � _ - - a �o � - _ _ _ _ � - u a a�iv_ �'g � m m _ m 'n .^ c o� 5� z� �= u� a n o s s.,e_ «a o.. =5.._ i m � f 1 e g �� '� � t � � ! e .y. �� I� � � �' e g �� R � � � � � 1 !i t � } � eP = 1« : j�� : 7 n '6 Y � � � � _ Eo s �Q z�w !P � =�S L� z _o C�'V � � ��'z' W J � � � awx G w � �am � � <' t� iF'��;, azz oa� oam „ , �g i i R�� . 3 � , €$ � � m � � _ a � � 'a.� i��'; o�� / �, Q ��W o � -� �"',; w� oQw o . s � �`�_-\ �s\\ �i � � � . �� a �. � z \ ; � ,�,1,1� � aoQa � �m �� P� � ��°� � . � ��\"°�'°s\ � Q� �W U Q Q ZO � o � Z 00 a =� � �" � � z9^� �s�� <; o ql .o� m.:�.� OS /e mv o l, ` os �e a� r � � V u sz eo � , y ug f7 Z 6 �Q Q as ¢ S�a � W g :z - J �p�o_ i g V o5o a3o�, O c��5�y��. 111 Z�� w_ Q �� \ v�¢KU VV � OC�jC O � ��O � OP' `��"< �'� � Q' o ��, �;�/ � \, �r. �� Y� � e�� , � Z�-\\ �o,��\ �� "N � � � � � � � �,�`� �� ';.��j� � � �\ � ,� ^ �':�.�� s\ S-� �r� � � � e � ; � k � ;°Y! �N \ \��,s \o�o� , s \ l� I V Q \ nm \\ // .� �� / Y/I/�\ � ��.� dZw^ �8- ') T� \ � � Q C9 J \� '' CJ 1- � C¢J �/ y.� � N'' % x� OC��R '�� s�� '\ \ sm� �p��\ \� ��.� rV \ e \ ov* =m 2 P`.\,\ ` }i 4� ( + � \� ��\ m x �'� � - f 3 \ �LL� P T\ `� 1 � � v P\ .02! � \ ,��/ � �4 + � �20 oN\�m �\� �� - �P\ ` �P\\�� k�. .1 ��-rT � _ �. � o - o o w - � £°€ � os€ o � mW. `ga gos �: `3,_s�. ;,' . '• ; }�E 1 �: ; • �� •, Z� � �l1,:. �s r` ':�� '-' - ` `�� .. . . -'��►� ,�7 . � ■�� ■ ��1��_.—_ „� �„�� , , ��„�,,,,,,, ;,,,,, � � �tt � �„ .,,, ��.=�o� _ � �:� °� .��'�� JIIi�, ;�� r��11 � W H o z W °� U Z O � � � � � � � � NL� XU mQ X(n c-J X� � � — �`"� � (V ' � � � � � N � � N r- � U � N L.L � � � .� � � � � L � � O U N N N �- �-- c0 i�- I� cQ x x X X N N N N (V � c- �- c- r- '/� N N N N y, X X X X `+"� CV N CV N O.= r � r- N N N N � --- - F�° F�= F�E I� � � � n � :-� � �, ';, ,� � � :�. � � �� #� . ��.a �t� �' �`" :'i `' -��" ' .�`��„". �t :=.i�! . � `y� " -"�. �` :� "-�� 1 �� w� . �,�-�` ,�Y,�„ �,, " ,�" �,, '�� '�,�� ,:,: �" ��. , ?''� l � `i rr �' ,�. =� �` - ,fi- "� '� : `''� ' R ��; , 5 � Y � �R� j �., . � ' .. 'y�7�� " �.;�''t , . �� '+� ±�" �i � � F'� ?�4'•`i P , � s + ' �3�.e�r=;?:,� +' � � ' , _ �.:". -��' � ..� - - ' r =-- ',�. EXAMPLE STONE FENCE POST ai�,i i C F+ i �. ,�7 ��L �� , ►. a.� - r�v� , �, � � ��. ' �.� e�, r � � [ r :+ � ' y��'�tr!`.. � i7k ��• . �� : � ~ �!"'°'y � ��"."r, .�..ti� �"'.,'""'"'""""":.�"� �.�..�.,,,� ��I ��'��:� � e { . .. . . % . . a 4 ! .. . •�ief� � ' ,r ; ' � �#,�'S.?'."'-� �_ F `' — ,. :.'F� � - - �� s. "4.;- . �'�~ � � �., .. - '; � , K �„ � , ' ' .'� . , - - �;.., ' - � ' f . . ✓ +i` r Z .� ,.� �. �k� .'1' lr .. {.. 7. . h �"e? � - .. �f _�i ._.. i�. ,� . , +w AF ,.4 L . '� ryk� :." " . . h.. . ,w � �!� . � !�e � fi v ��.. . .. �' , . � �. . M } � *' �� - � � v' y. y,c �'rt l +� :`S' . . '�1�� "A, r.°_� �� - . .. �i�. ... . - - . . , . .. . . S^ , .. �t �.�� . . � . � . .. - r :,' ' . .' � . � . . . 4 � f � „, ', ti ^ty,� �': . .. ` � �: . �. ��T� , -��.+V� -. !"'��: i.,�� q�r��'$1#e.;f_ . at . . _.. . '4 1 1 rk;�y , i'k , w, �l � t � ., � - . . . ,�. . . �y . , > �x �' � .. � - r .,. y � ` � ,� , "� SP .. �, 7 . . 1 .. y , ., � � + � -.. 3 ' ��` :: , _ . .. Y�I' ' � 1 � } . . p `f� . -- . ,., '�✓.1� . " 'i . � 1 t � � i ' ' t '� 1 k � t ti ' i �LFJ �F�1 t �y�..,.�� ` �y � �� '�' .._ 31�, �5��' �•-�� . ��N . .,. � 1� 'e a ,a�1�6 `w 1 k}��Y, r �y �� +k�y°'.�� -r W�" � �'3.='� '�` W.�.'i y � ��'e�`;r'�` 1�7X�� . : � y �d.i'�A.kvN ..�Y�..0 ��.�- . r. ,: � •^ '�°�x ' a ... ..`. . -� i �. � .:. 1 � 'F � +, ,..,. .�._li�it"� .��`i.i�c � .� �i��.'�' �r�_A.. �'. ._ n •�_. .... �t�. � ..s . ��4 .i.:�.� l:_ '1� � Planning Commission Agenda 09/O 1/2020 2D. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Request for Preliminarv and Final Plat for a Two-Lot Subdivision in a B-4 (Re�ional Business) District Applicant: Krishna, LLC. (NAC) Property: Planning Case Number: Legal: Lot 2, Block 1, Jefferson Commons 3rd Addition Address: NA 2020-023 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: Subdivision/Replat of a single 4.58 acre parcel into two replatted lots in the B-4, Regional Business District, proposed as Krishna Commercial December 12, 2020 Places to Shop B-4, Regional Business The purpose of the `B-4" regional business district is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. NA Vacant Single Family Residential Vacant Commercial Vacant Commercial Commercial Recreation/Indoor Project Description: The applicant proposes to subdivide an existing commercial parcel and relocate the existing access drive to the new common property line. After subdivision, the applicant has discussed development of the easterly 2.01 acre parcel for commercial use, which would be subject to a separate future application. Planning Commission Agenda 09/O 1/2020 ANALYSIS The subdivision of the proposed 4.58 acre parcel would create two separate commercial parcels. The westerly parcel would be 2.57 acres in area, with approximately 327 feet of frontage along the north side of School Boulevard. The easterly parcel would be 2.01 acres in size, and have 315 feet of frontage. As noted above, the site is zoned B-4, Regional Business. In the B-4 District, there are no minimum lot width or area requirements. The primary consideration is whether the proposed lot(s) will be able to accommodate a typical commercial development without the need for extraordinary zoning flexibility or variances. For comparison, the parcels that contain the Applebee's and Culver's restaurants in the Jefferson Commons development area are both less than 1.5 acres in area. The proposed 2+ acre parcels should easily accommodate a commercial development. The applicant proposes to utilize the easterly 2.01 acre parcel (Lot 2) for a childcare/preschool development that will be brought forward later for review. The applicant has been working with staff to develop a site plan for that parcel, and is awaiting plat approval before finalizing that plan and application. Childcare is a permitted use in the B-4 District, but a conditional use permit may be required due to the required shared access for the two parcels. The applicant has provided a site plan for reference, but which is not part of the formal review at this time. As a part of the current subdivision, the applicant is seeking a reduction in size of the currently-platted drainage and utility easements that encumber a significant portion of the east and north boundaries of the site. The e�sting easement width is 100 feet, protecting a maj or sanitary sewer utility. The applicant has sought a reduction of that easement to a total of 60 feet to make better use of the remaining property by giving him additional options for building placement and has communicated with the City Engineer on the appropriate dimensions after vacation. The easements are proposed to be vacated in full and then re-established as proposed on the final plat. The City Council has called for the hearing for the vacation of easements for September 28, 2020. The existing site is relatively flat and was provided with street construction and utility services at the time of the original development by the City of Monticello several years ago. No new streets or utilities are required to accommodate this plat, and grading will reflect the specific needs of the users on each of the two new parcels. As a part of the plat approval, the applicant will be required to relocate the current access point to a shared position along the new boundary line between the two parcels. That construction would occur concurrent with development of the first of the two lots, presumably with the construction of the daycare/preschool use. 2 Planning Commission Agenda 09/O 1/2020 It should be noted that the parcel is currently held by the State of Minnesota through the tax forfeiture process. Wright County administers the forfeiture and sale process for the state. The applicant is considering the purchase of the property through Wright County. The City Council authorized a six-month hold on the sale of the parcel to allow the applicant time to work through due diligence items, including the platting process. With the sale of the parcel, prior special assessment amounts will be paid to the city as part of the sale proceeds. However, unpaid interest from the date of tax forfeiture (2016) to present has not been included in the property sale price at the county. Therefore, any approval of the preliminary and final plat is contingent on the applicant obtaining fee title to the property and payment of any unpaid interest for the School Boulevard construction project assessment. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS L Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2020-026 for approval of the Preliminary Plat for Krishna Commercial, based on the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of this report, as well as on the findings in said Resolution. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. PC 2020-026, for approval of the Preliminary for Krishna Commercial, based on findings to be identified by the Planning Commission following the public hearing. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution, subj ect to additional information from the applicant or staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the Resolution, recommending the Preliminary Plat to the City Council, with the conditions noted in Exhibit Z. The two parcels should be well sized to accommodate future commercial development consistent with the requirements of the land use plan and zoning district. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2020-026 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Preliminary Plat E. Final Plat F. Site Plan — Concept G. City Engineers Letter - August, 2020 Z. Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Agenda 09/O 1/2020 EXHIBIT Z Preliminary and Final Plat Krishna Commercial Lot 2, Block 1, Jefferson Commons 3''d Addition (Replatting to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Krishna Commercial) 1. City Council final action on vacating the 100' utility easements in place, and replacing them with the proposed easements on the Preliminary Plat drawing dated 08/10/20. 2. Location of the driveway curb cut at a shared access location, and appropriate zoning approvals related to that construction. 3. The city waives the requirement for fee title property owner signature for application (as the parcel is tax forfeit), with the condition that the applicant obtain fee title to the property prior to filing of the final plat. 4. The applicant shall pay any required special assessment interest for prior city improvement projects as part of the property acquisition. 5. Execution of a development agreement related to the plat development. 6. Comments/Requirements of the City Engineer and other staff, including those related to right of way width for School Boulevard and any required easement for the existing trail. 7. Comments and recommendations of the Planning Commission. 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2020-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF KRISHNA COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, the applicant is the applicant and prospective owner of a parcel currently platted as Lot 2, Block 1, Jefferson Commons 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, the subject property is currently platted as a single parcel; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to subdivide the subject parcel into two lots for the purpose of commercial development; and WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned B-4, Regional Business, and the proposed lots will meet the applicable zoning requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the matter at its regular meeting on September lst, 2020, and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision creates lots that will continue to meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed subdivision will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. 4. The commercial development of the subj ect parcels is feasible given common commercial lot sizes. 5. The plat requires no new public streets or utilities, and can accommodate right-of- way, and other public improvements in the area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the proposed plat is hereby recommended for approval, subj ect to the conditions found in Exhibit Z of the staff report on the matter, as follows: 1. City Council final action on vacating the 100' utility easements in place, and replacing them with the proposed easements on the Preliminary Plat drawing dated August 10, 2020. 2. Relocation of the driveway curb cut to a shared access location, and appropriate zoning approvals related to that construction. 3. Comments/Requirements of the City Engineer and other staff. 4. Comments and recommendations of the Planning Commission. ADOPTED this lst day of September, 2020, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION : ATTEST: Sam Murdoff, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 �,�°''�" L� � � � � p� d. ,� ., �' � � r7 h ,., y � ',3 ,� � w T .q"' '4� �;. � � � � '•. �" �, ;�. - • a�� n,� �' s:�.-' •:v � _ . . �'� u�' R _ � � �'�f , �'�� o "�'` - � �� , � �� F� ' �, �. �- �; � �'� - �C ■ '�"`,�, * c � � �j_�_ � 1 , `:�yI . �.. tli� � . � _ ,}��.' . �,. '� . � Y � ,' '��;. � ..r! �; . a . + �. � �� ;� � � � ` �� ` 'f f � ,� � i"/�` . � �� bNb . �� . � _ , . �. -� � �� - � �� =f `� � r : o � � � �� o �. . �-,. � '� � N '� � � � CO � � +� � ..,r , . � � . � O f'6 O � u7 ' � � Q � � 2 a O °'"E * �c U � ' '` � o U /}� � Q �, �7 U} �V � � _ N . ' 4.! � �� L � 1^ i^I�T� ��, R� � 7 i � � ia � Q � .....`T�� a � � � � ° r''� � ',:� '� ,� � � {� �� .-��f �w. � �, •. � — Q f `r.} , . �'.. t, ;a. -•`.+► i ;: .,s , �_ ' `' ,. ,; ! • + • � r � 1 r T.. '� h �• i�� , . � ��'.� : � � 1 *" � . . ; � �: L � 1 . � � t ♦ ��' r �i � � ��_. ` �' _ . . 1 ; . f :. F � � # �' +�' �•PI w�t 0 0 � �,� : �--� � ' „ C !i E � F 1� � F � (j � . � " r� ��" ' �� „"� . !'t� `. p � � �' � N O p �, � OC L � _ . r , � a _ � *rRl r � ' � . . � r. r 0 � � " '�e,: l . ,_ �. � ....� � '� r .. � � `� � . , � .< < 0 u , t� � .. � � � � � � , � � N ' � �F. < _ � ;� ' ', J .. .�, �-+ m. ' y � p "''� � � r, • �' � � � � . � �� /�' � , � ,�� t�i�._` � U � �*: '� ,rr , i� �,� *'T "._,:�� "� '��.. _ � r Krishna, LLC 6060 Lanewood Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55446 August 10, 2020 City of Monticello Attn: Jacob Thunander, Comm. Dev. Coordinator 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55376 Re: Krishna Commercial Narrative We are looking to acquire the existing commercial property on the north side of School Boulevard, located immediately east of the River City Extreme business. The existing property is currently platted as Lot 2, Block 1, Jefferson Commons Third Addition. The existing property is tax-forfeit and is currently owned by Wright County. We have been coordinating with city staff regarding acquisition of this property and process necessary to accommodate the transaction. We are also coordinating with the city EDA for assistance in this process. We are looking to acquire the property and prepare for future site development with a Goddard School early childhood education facility. The facility would accommodate a maximum of 144 students and employ approximately 25 people. Additional information about Goddard School operations will be provided at the time of future site development. The existing property is larger than our needs for a Goddard School facility, therefore we are requesting subdivision of the existing larger parcel into two smaller parcels. We are proposing the subdivision be processed by final plat with the name Krishna Commercial. The future Goddard School development is proposed on the easterly of the two lots. See Concept D dated 08/07/2020 submitted with the subdivision land use application. We are requesting approval of the Krishna Commercial subdivision such that we can market and sell the remaining westerly lot to other commercial users. It is understood that access to the two lots is to be shared with one access from School Boulevard. It is understood that a Conditional Use Permit will be required at the time of site development that will address shared access items. Schedule for site development of the easterly lot with a future Goddard School building and site improvements is anticipated to be 2021. We currently have another Goddard School project under construction in Albertville that is scheduled to open for business late 2020. Market conditions will ultimately dictate schedule for the Monticello site. Please contact me with any questions. Vikram Aggarwal krishna.11c.mn(a�qmail.com 612-812-0372 () L� lYld AtlYNIW/73tld zg - - �aal3ie�5 ]��3n 3ie�5 ]�i�vOZiaOH os � o3:r�3H� a J Z W O ; —�—�—�—�—�—�—� OS A8 03N�1530 ^ � � 0 � M �a �A8 03dtld3dd � \ . ¢ � ^ e�osew�yy ropaoguopy o �� p^I8 looyag xxxxx ensaz N a oz�.a��o S os ,�e wHvao ��„ ° � � � �-�yt'Cti � 0 � � m a� � l b'1'JL-13WW0`J b'NHSItUI ^p•w� n.m�s w, n un w� z x.o ��a,.3 m,b..w�a a.w�;i N�w a�o i iWi 3 oi <i eo � am �.. ��.w � � w .W �v a��a �. �s,�sNoisn3a oz/o�/ao 3 eo �' o am., ,e •„o.�e�.m +�we .,,w nw �ri.., �v i a � w m � s . u § �g�;$��s;,�� , < � _ � � o _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8 8 �wwwww d a a __ o � - W W (7 � w i - � J � I = (n o O 0 � � � � a U = OC _ x � U 3' Q o' Q � a U�o 0 o Q__ �� 4 W ¢ 4 ~ G 1 m� o O a i J -.i N w a . o' e N �� b-H SONOd �312fINNd� a roo�a � r. e� s�vnner s�e - t o; i �.oz � � i os os a�j5 O4 h �` I yR N n I 3 aw ��M I �" O � � � im y �I O r i > n � � � m � -M6£SSOS-@€YO€-----------J ____________________ e � �P � U Iry � �w � I O �� w� g I i I I a I I U ` I N � I Vi Z � � v � � o � � � . � � �: s "' � �� m ��,`k Z o � NN � 0 0 � %�N � � � N �� e � � �5 y � w ��: \ m ¢ Y V \ -� ,OZ \ -----------------------------\� 9S"804 3,bS,SO.ON . . .., ,10� .,.., ,_.. Z NJ0�9 �OOV O2fIH1 SNOWWO� N052f3�2f3(` ��, � -e m 7 r � _ E - z: a � f�E z° S �xsia a � � . �;,€� £ C ` Y qg�',�,�N� €.: W �� _ . fr �`=Ed:� e a € afrE3"�M t � £EpEyJ 3 _� E��° � I E_a`� � t �w_�'= s C ;'figa �„ -=E" R� E9 ¢�g�g W g�aeE 7N a� �L&frs S Y�� t� vl z� �€ I� JLL x4 9 - � <J==a ` x a kz " £s€s"`a s kz �� a _ x ea ��=�8: 8 e; _ � _ a G`., f _�EE'€ G`� � � U � k�� ' i �:F=- � ;� ��a � �� .�� ,��,�,....� �<�;�� -- �� '��%��v �=%C� a�� O �� 1 ;O '�, � � � �- _ a .ss....aa s �, h� " ---s�'oos-- i ' y I 1 � > / -- � y� b � �� — L__—__�-. z � _, � �� ; x _ _ _ = _ ____bs__ � � cn - , ° I " c� I-----------��-----------I --- - � I —1 � U) � ,� -_ — , �� ; �- �i..i �, i r.> i$ya ; c� �----- � _ �z �� :� � C� '_ `; ._ _� � ----a � � �' — --�� P I �_�--�a c — �� o c ,_ , --armc--��- � o � �� ` �, _ O � U � � �� O �I C� � I �� I � m I ,, y ^ ` � <_ \ e$� � �� '----� l,') �_ �� I� � � � � „ � Li �. ----------------------------------, O p-�s�eo>--- �- � . S.S0.00 N �_J F_ f� J O E S � € ^ �I � � �� i�ea�as��,z��eous�n ZL£0-Zl8-Zl9 �emix.Y9y uiu y�n 94655 NYl `4��o�^[d �,�� aua� poomaue7OE05 �11 `b'NHSI?I?I '�, :� � a Nrx le�nw� r�oaeuupy 'otleapuo�y PM6 MoyaS XXXX 1D3!'OHd 1N3W3AOHdWI 3115 iooH�s aavaaoo - GGN m a Q Z _ Y o66 _ Q -waa - w w a a �� a �"" a� <a; '�` - <N� ��< < aW _Z960 9°�aae�� 3J ____� �W � yau� � I� ` 4aw t QS A6 Q3MJ3HJ 3'MS MIInN 3M5 MIAtlZN'OH � u�tsaaazis�� as aeo�nrs3a n � �utBHHut�uH ]IAIJ :�9 a3rxt3w n \ 0 ,x .�, ;y,o 0 as .�e H.u�a � �w��vr n.w�s w� m+w w� i ..w.+..�,e�, ��„aw« as,.� .ww e,� � wu, oz co eo �w w � u� xa �p nw ww�xw�kvw � � G � , s9 — --° --- —, ----------a ------- e �--�z�j�= � � b "� 4 �� 0 6°°� - I� o � o � � � I � oo� ��N m om� � o � I d - � os�� „ �oz�� Q � c� Do � Q � i ��a � �i Q« -1��_ . i �� I ��N I i o� �� o- �� 0 \ � r i � ^ ' � i ----j--�----'----_-----'— -- --r —m----J �- ^ �<y� i� _ _- ___ ___t� ____� `�o= L- i e �oe I i �i �I f�g��i ii a �, i � � �i i I i i i i i r i � z � � r�" i ► i _ i Q i i w � � i w � � Q i �� i a�� i N�U' � N i � � � ` � i o � J � n � i� � i n � � � i i � i� � � � � N I li �\ � � OZ ��- � � � i � � i � � � CITY OF -� �V'i n l+c a ote August 21, 2020 Re: Krishna Commercial Plat City Project # 2020-023 OFFICE:763-295-2711 FAX:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street� Suite 1 � Monticello, MN 55362 The Engineering Department has reviewed the Plat dated 8/14/20 as prepared Meyer Rohlin and offers the following comments: General Comments 1. Easement vacation to be contingent on approved final plat being recorded with Wright County. 2. Developer is responsible to verify if any private utilities are located within the vacated easement. Developer provided updated preliminary plat on 8/24/20 showing that there are no private utilities in the portion of easement being vacated. 3. Developer to provide 7.5' trail easement along School Blvd. Along the east 100' of the plat the trail will taper from 7.5' to 0'. 4. Following the access spacing guidelines from the 2011 Transportation Plan only 1 shared access will be allowed for the two proposed lots. 5. If the development proposal has 1 acre or more of new impervious surface volume control (infiltration) will be required for stormwater management. 6. If the development proposal will disturb 1 acre or more an NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) will be required. 7. A more detailed review of the development plans will be completed when the applicant submits civil plans. The City is not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please contact the Engineering Department with any questions. Sincerely, i�'GC�t�,L�dr.,� Matt Leonard City Engineer www.ci.monticello.mn.us Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/20 3A. Communitv Development Director's Report COVID-19 City of Monticello Information Resource: https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/covidl9 Council Action on/related to Commission Recommendations None at this time. Staff held the first of the three proposed zoning amendments, the amendment for accessory structure requirements, to allow the window sign and manufactured home amendments to come forward for recommendation. Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Since the time of the joint Commission/Council meeting in July, the Lakota Group/WSB and city staff team have been busy working on the Monti2040 Plan. A few important engagement highlights: 1. Stakeholder meetings were held in late May and early June to gather additional feedback on the Land Use and Mobility chapters of the plan 2. An online community workshop and survey on the Land Use and Mobility chapters was available from 7une to August 3. A July meeting with Planning Commission, City Council and the Monticello Township Board was held to review the Land Use and Mobility chapters 4. July meetings with the EDA and PARC were held to help define direction of the Economic Development and Park, Open Space and Pathway chapters 5. A series of quick polls were posted and sent in August to help provide direction for the upcoming Parks, Economic Development and Community Identity chapters With comments and ideas coming in from the above, the team has prepared public drafts of the Land Use and Mobility chapters, which are available at ci.monticello.mn.us/2020update. Between August 29th-August 31st, the TAGCAC, PARC and EDA will receive the Parks and Economic Development Chapters for review. The TAGCAC will be invited to attend the PARC and EDA meetings to share comments and ideas alongside those boards. 1. Parks Chapter Comments: Special Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission (PARC) Meeting at 8 AM on Wednesday September 2"a 2. Economic Development Chapter Comments: EDA Workshop at 4:30 PM on Wednesday, September 9tn The Lakota/WSB team is also currently drafting the last two chapters of the plan: Community Facilities, and Community Identity. The goal will be to have all six chapters of the Monti2040 Plan ready for public review and comment by mid-September. Please Planning Commission Agenda — 09/O 1/20 stay tuned for a video explaining what Montice11o2040 is and imagining Monticello at 2040 if the components of the plan come to fruition. Housing Study MSA Professionals has completed a draft of the 2020 Housing Report, which staff received on August 26th. Staff will begin their review and provide comments to MSA. Presentation of the report is anticipated at the EDA meeting on September 9t'', 2020 at 6 PM. The Planning Commission is asked to attend to hear the presentation. CMRP Updates At the regular August Partnership meeting, regional planning consultant Planning Next provided an overview of the Round 1 Engagement Analysis. The full report is attached for reference. Also included are overview slides from the August Partnership presentation which detail the main themes resulting from the community engagement. In addition to the Round 1 Engagement summary, a one-piece graphic depicting the Technical Analysis from Round 1 has also been completed and is attached. The Commission can watch the August 27th meeting in full by clicking on the agenda link at the CMRP website: https://re�ionalplannin�partnership. or�/about-the-partnership/a�endas-and-notes/ 2 � � ,� 2030 �r� .� n R K partneringforthe future 1 r`i �1 �\ DRAFT, Version 1.0 � 8/13/2020 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT ROUND ONE The following draft report is for the review and discussion of the CMRP Partnership during its meeting on August 27, 2020 from 7:30 to 9:00 AM. Table of contents 1. Introduction and Back r� o� 1.1. Proiect Back�round 1.2. En��ement Overview 1.3. Stakeholders. Survevs and Questions 1.4. Navi a� t� 2. Overarchin� Themes 3. Question-by-Question Analysis 4. Stakeholder Group Analvsis The following presents a summary of the stakeholder activity from the first round of community engagement in support of the Framework 2030 planning project. The Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership engaged key stakeholders in spring and early summer 2020. 1.1 Project Background The Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership (CMRPP) anticipates significant growth and development in the coming decades. Partners are collaborating on Framework 2030, a planning and economic development project, to optimize regional and local benefits so we can maintain a high quality of life for area residents, businesses, and visitors. Framework 2030 has the following major planning elements and associated engagement: • Baseline Conditions and Trends Analysis, Engagement Round 1: Gather big-picture ideas about our community and the region today and in the future (spring and early summer 2020) FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 1 of 21 • Growth, Land Use and Economic Analysis, Engagement Round 2: Gather feedback on key concepts and specific actions for possible inclusion in the planning framework (late summer/fall 2020) • Action Planning, Engagement Round 3: Gather final feedback on prioritization of draft framework elements including key findings and recommendations (late fall/early winter 2020) This regional effort includes Sherburne and Wright counties, with a focused planning area as outlined below. 4i'�eIGHT ��JFRTi' � . r � �,,�+, >ry.. •y.ai��r: � 1.2 Engagement Overview :nae G3r n a p. s I�:.ns,� wio�niii. a.mu�m I�j , . .�{ �:ti,�sr.y+ �"'� °s,�.�,.=,t�t�rws ArFw t x.n 53iER�CJR�hiE GG?LAHTY Round 1 engagement was conducted during COVID-19 public health restrictions, so engagement was exclusively online. There were four surveys, with "big-picture" questions tailored to the following stakeholder groups: • Community members • Employees of public, private, and nonprofit organizations • Leaders of public, private, and nonprofit organizations • Elected and appointed officials Outreach and recruitment were done using a"network" approach: asking direct connections to invite and encourage people in their networks to participate and further spread the word. Invitations were sent by Partnership members and staff, community connections, social media, and other means. FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 2 of 21 1.3 Stakeholders, Surveys and Questions In advance of the first round of engagement, the Partners met to discuss and determine the targets for stakeholder outreach. In advance of the first round of engagement, the Partners met to discuss and determine the targets for stakeholder outreach. The table below shows Round 1 results by those stakeholder clusters. ICON STAKEHOLDER GROUP TOTAL PARTICIPANTS TOTAL COMMENTS LINK TO COMPILATION � i � Round 1 Communitv- �� Community Members 500 2� 564 Comailation with word clouds.pdf I� Employees of public, private, Round 1 Emalovees- � and nonprofit organizations 553 * ��056 Comailation with word clouds.pdf � �, Leaders of public, private, c Round 1 Oreanizations � � V 5 69 - �ompilation with �/�, and nonprofit organizations word clouds.pdf � Round 1 Elected and appointed ( Elected-Aaaointed � officials � V 961 Officials - Compilation with word clouds.pdf TOTALS: 1, 2 2 5 7,149 *There is a small overlap between employees and community members. Survey Development and Distribution The surveys were tailored to people in each of the four groups, and all included multiple-choice and open-ended questions about each respondent's background, community, and their vision for the future.The analysis within this report focuses on the open-ended received by each of the four groups. To see the questions included in the tailored surveys, please refer to the compilation links in the table above. FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 3 of 21 1.4 Navigation Following this introduction there are three additional sections that present the major themes revealed through the first round of engagement. Please refer to the table of contents for quick navigation. In section 3. Question-by-Question Analysis, hyperlinks provide a quick link to each of the specific question prompts. The initial round of stakeholder outreach and engagement generated more than 7,000 responses to its 18 open-ended question prompts. The focus of these prompts varied from assessments of the region's current condition to ideas to improve the region in the future. Planning NEXT reviewed each of the responses and developed a responsive categorization scheme. Based on this thorough reading and review, several overarching themes have been identified. These themes are not intended as final or entirely inclusive, but rather provide a high-level perspective on what was shared through the thousands of responses. KEY Umbrella TopiC (key word capturing large segments of the feedback) Sub-topic (major sentiments within the topic) - Themes (subjective statements elaborating on the sub-topic) Community • Connections to people and place - Strong ties between families and their neighbors and community. • Small town feel - Expressed across numerous scales from the rural to the neighborhoods to the cities. Definition is relative but the sentiment is commonly expressed. As compared to other parts of the larger metropolitan area. • Organizations and civic infrastructure - Thick web of civic networks and organizations. Opportunities to get involved across myriad causes in service to the local community. • Education - Foundation for community building and connections. Opportunities to continue to grow, improve and expand opportunities. • Networking our assets or thinking regionally - What's thought of as ours. The opportunity to build a bigger backyard by thinking regionally and sharing amenities and advantages. • Regional identity - Establishing a unique and compelling identity that positions the region competitively and clearly articulates our assets and advantages. Opportunity • Economic expansion and diversification - Growing the base of jobs, diversity of employers, and opportunities for locals. • Land planning and management - Achieve broad or specific community goals through clear articulation of land policy; preserving open spaces, building strong neighborhoods, investing in downtowns. • Vibrant places and spaces - Building lively and active spaces that bring the best of what we experience elsewhere. FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 4 of 21 • Youth - Investing in the next generation to make leaving a difficult choice. Location • Advantage - Opportunities to capture the best aspects of the rising tide, build the peripheral community we want and limit what we don't. • Demand - Growth pressures creeping from the Twin Cities create opportunities and challenges. • Assets, amenities, and resources - Proximity to the full spectrum of "places" from the city to the wild. Part of the identity of the region. • Regional connections and access - Provided through the physical connections like I-94, US10, NorthStar. Opportunities to better connect internally. Growth • Housing - Questions abound. The location, density and affordability are all primary considerations. The demand, however, is present and growing. • Connections - Building on the region's internal connections, physical and non-physical. Investing in projects with a strong return on investment that create a strategic advantage. • Economic Expansion - Growth of the local economy is measured in jobs, wages, and variety. Considers improving options for locals. • Special projects - Some projects are regional in scope and will require strong leadership, collaboration, and fair funding models. Examples include a hockey arena, new multi-use trails, and a new bridge across the Mississippi River. Leadership • Collaboration - Demonstrated and appreciated through the initial work of the CMRP. Opportunity to deepen, formalize, and extend to other sectors including private, philanthropic, etc. Working together and demonstrating results key to establishing the identity of the region. • Governance - Responsible, effective, and forward-thinking. • Strategic thinking - Coordinated responses that connect vertically (local to regional goals) and horizontally (community by community goals). • Proactivity - Managing transitions and mitigating disruption. FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 5 of 21 The following section is organized by the 18 unique questions that were shared with the various stakeholder groups during the Framework 2030 Community Engagement Round 1. For each question prompt, this analysis indicates which stakeholder groups were asked to respond along with the total number of responses. Themes or representative responses were derived by the Planning NEXT after reading and categorizing the input. These statements are not organized by frequency and do not represent an order or hierarchy. They are representative responses to help the reader better understand the 7,000+ comments received during round 1. A full database of all responses is also available for reading and review. EXAMPLE KEY #. Question prompt posed during the round STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTEDS / COMMUNITY/ EMPLOYEES [Responding stakeholders] TOTAL RESPONSES: #[All collected comments to the prompt] REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Themes from the pool of responses that cover the depth and breadth of comments _�. �.t:'�=�_e: �:�a.i;�:�_ :`�x�rraple ��ot�e� ir�r�fr �he f �' rf�C}�7�"�S'. -Errl��oy�e �'�Sp�r��r�t Expository Prompts from the Round I Stakeholder Survey (Click for direct link to content) A. In what ways mi h�t you help the re�ion continue to be attractive and appealin� to current and future residents? B. Please use the space below for any other ideas about the future of your community or the re i� C. Thinkin� about the communitv where vou work, what makes it special or unique? D. What are critical barriers or challen�es to stron� business �rowth and development in this re i� E. What are critical barriers or challen�es to stron� �rowth and development in this re�ion? F. What are some ke�priorities? G. What are the leadership requirements or dvnamics that affect future economic development? H. What is needed to meet the re�ion's future employment, educational, housin�, or transportation needs? I. What is one example of a major opportunityyproject, or initiative that we can only accomplish if public entities work to�ether and with private or�anizations across the re�ion? J. What is one example of a major opportunityyproject, or initiative that we can only accomplish if public, private, and nonprofit or�anizations across the re�ion work to�ether? K. What makes you feel connected to your communit� FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 6 of 21 L. What makes you optimistic? M. What role mi�ht vou plav in advancin� that kind of collaborative re�ional effort? N. What will make this re�ion attractive for people to stay or move here? O. What would help vou feel more connected to vour communitv? P. What are your �reatest concerns or questions? Q. When vou talk with people who aren't from the communitv where vour or�anization is located (or the area you serve), what do you tell them makes the community special, unique, or important? R. When vou talk with people who aren't from vour local communitv or town, what do vou sav makes your community special, unique, or important to you/your famil� FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 7 of 21 A. In what ways might you help the region continue to be attractive and appealing to current and future residents? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTEDS / COMMUNITY/ EMPLOYEES TOTAL RESPONSES: 722 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Advocate for expanded amenity offerings and public space _r,..,.,.s-,__: ,;:a.� _;—_ programming 'r$4� �C7�i��7�J�Q ��] �l�)�f� • Look for deficits (what do we have to leave the region for?) �� f�� • Protect our sensitive environmental areas as central assets ��j�,�� y�� y�� ,��P • Promote action and vibrancy ��f ��+��'� • Identify physical opportunity areas (ex: community downtowns) ,��.7��,�� • Help foster a civically minded collection of communities • "Be a good neighbor" and do our part • Look for opportunities to be involved in the community • Contribute to a more open and welcoming community • Spread community highlights to others and Tell the story of each community to better expose shared assets • Support local businesses that add to the community fabric • Support our local school districts • Advocate for "thoughtful planning' • Better understand the future housing needs of the region • Invest in enabling infrastructure like roads and high speed internet CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: A. Hel�pdf FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 8 of 21 e. Please use the space below for any other ideas about the future of your community or the region. STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTEDS / COMMUNITY/ EMPLOYEES / ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL RESPONSES: 330 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Feature a wider variety of food options and amenities ��'�'``°'�°-- `°', <��Tr o Enhance quality of life and vibrancy through �r�� '� �� t � programming '�� '�'�`�� • Build a regional hockey complex or arena �'�s'��° '��'�t �� • Leverage natural resources like trails and campsites ��'��'�t' �� '� �� o Create more trail connections for walking, bikes, and ��+��'��° `�� ATVs ��r��'r �a �c�art�p��h �h�rr o Create a broader definition of "our community" ��'� ��'��' �� • Maintain the places that we've built rather than abandoning them -Cc�rxrrfrrzrr�rty Res�or�der�� • Be more proactive in the face of growth trends • Invest in enabling infrastructure like high speed internet • Embrace diversity in various forms (demographic, economic, housing, etc.) as an advantage to and hedge against uncertain future • Plan with a vision o Answering the question, who are we today? o Who do we want to become? CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: B. Other.pdf C. Thinking about the community where you work, what makes it special or unique? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: EMPLOYEES TOTAL RESPONSES: 802 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Community character juxtaposed with the south / north (Twin Clties and St. Cloud) • Close knit, strong community connections • Variety of place types / neighborhoods • Continued growth in the region • Local school districts are a selling point • Access and location within the broader mega-region _,.'°�t:'r�_� ��li�=�-� e��rr�� #ow�r i�� vf��e fi�rr`ri� �I�� f� �ri� �r�y �f7?�f7�t��S, " -�rr'tp�oye� f��s�o��tl�r�C FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 9 of 21 • Beautiful natural resources like our lakes and parks CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: C. Unique.pdf D. What are critical barriers or challenges to strong business growth and development in this region? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: Elected TOTAL RESPONSES: 65 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • The dissolving discourse especially as experienced on social media platforms • Non-networked partners in the region o Unshared assets o Lack of communication and recognition • Supply of skilled labor or labor in general (workforce limitations) • Unmet housing needs and existing deficits in the market • Economic red tape (perceived or real) • Economic identity crisis around "who do we want to be? What is our vision?" • Transportation connections and other inefficiencies CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: D. Challen�es.pdf L,...r,�€:�_� ��.!:.._� :`f� vv�'f� �fw��rs b� a c�al��rrge ic� ��#r�c� ��o�ir��sses t� �he ar�a, ��C�'�� Qf ��7� corr��et�tiorr �r�m oih�r �c�rr+mr�rrrtre�. " -��ect�d �t�rcra� f��spvr��er�t E. What are critical barriers or challenges to strong growth and development in this region? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: Organizations TOTAL RESPONSES: 39 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Limited resources or overlapping fundraising needs • An identity crisis about our future vision "Who does this region want to become?" • Future tax issues • Disjointed or non-strategic land planning CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: E. Challen�es Growth.pdf _-,.�.,,_, : o-:o..�.��@� :r�c��C��7� �l��? t��' �vai��ble lar�d �or I]�'�1TElf�pl7?�f7t ��l7 lTii��t �h� rr��eds �or� �usir�� Wf�{J af�e ��c�,kir�t,�' �C7 �� }��_ r, -Or�a�r�zatre�rr ��spc�r��ferat FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 10 of 21 F. What are some key priorities? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTED / ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL RESPONSES: 111 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Highlight our destination assets =��..r,•�=`_=: �;:o--i.=s�= • Investing / protecting our green spaces and natural resources �r�� '��' �� • Build greater, broader employment opportunities ��'�� '�� f�''��}�' • Expand live /work potential within the region (bring workers ��'� �� - 3¢ home) • Invest in enabling infrastructure (including technology) -��t�� +�� +�� • Move up value chain when it comes to business investment • Build a strong and productive future use for Sherco site and other redevelopment areas that plays on the region's strengths • Focus on small businesses • Sticking to a vision-led plan • Addressing existing housing supply and the housing needs • Leveraging our existing transportation corridors and exploring new connections o River crossing CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: F. Priorities.pdf G. What are the leadership requirements or dynamics that affect future economic development? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTED TOTAL RESPONSES: 100 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Foster the next generation of leaders and continue to expand the pool of candidates • Willingness to make small bets • Stick to the vision o Decision making that factors in both short-term and long-term considerations • More engagement with small business owners • Offer real estate programs that address incubation / launching / scaling • Improve external communication about the region �<<..r.,`r�_�= ,u;� �:e i :fr��i�ify �� c�r��a�� t��7��",��i�1D� b��+V�Bd? garrer�rrxrer�.�, f��rsirr��s �r�d,�r�r�j�r��fr�S. �, -L�lecteo' C7ff�cr�� e�por+�erat FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 11 of 21 o Who are we? o Why here? o Sell the region o Speaking in common regional voice • Foster a sense of real collaboration CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: G. Leadershi�pdf H. What is needed to meet the region's future employment, educational, housing, or transportation needs? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: COMMUNITY/ ELECTED / EMPLOYEES / ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL RESPONSES: 914 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Investment in youth facilities and family focused activities • Increased openness to newcomers • Greater business and amenity diversity • Fostering a business friendly environment • Economic growth preference for small business • Expanding small business • The need to address future tax deficits • Competing for higher salary employers • Maintaining a fair, competitive tax rate • Investing in broadband access and new technology • Creating a post secondary option • Continuing to invest in high quality local schools • Fiscal responsibility • Strategic development • "Leaders with a modern vision" • Offering a variety of housing price points, types, and opportunities • Bridge over Mississippi (river crossing) • Leveraging Northstar as a way to strengthen regional connectivity • Enhancing public transit and multi-modal travel • Strategic investment in the road network CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: H. Need.pdf _,. .,:'��__: '_ ^..�.:,__v :`P��fic trarrsp�rt��r'orr i�ra� cvrr�r�ct� a!f t�� tc��r+,� rr� �'�c�rC��, �� -�arr�rnurr��}r �'e�ss,00r��e.r�t FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 12 of 21 1. What is one example of a major opportunity, project, or initiative that we can only accomplish if public entities work together and with private organizations across the region? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTED TOTAL RESPONSES: 43 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Fully leveraging the river • Tech sector development (i.e. Google Datacenter) • Increasing "value-add" industries or businesses • Investing in key enabling infrastructure like high speed internet, transportation corridors, and others • Specific examples: o Hockey arena o Rail Park o River crossing o New interchange (third in Monticello) o Data center(s) o Great river parkway CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: I. Collaborate.pdf :_��..i.•'r�__ �;:0_I;. _ :`,� var�� f��t� ai f�b e� �r o�h�� rr�h s,��i t�7��F7�f. " -�i�e��d Offrc�a} �'es�Oo.��er�t J. What is one example of a major opportunity, project, or initiative that we can only accomplish if public, private, and nonprofit organizations across the region work together? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL RESPONSES: 29 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Attracting major external development / investment into the region • Regional community-focused assets like trails, recreation centers, etc. • Major transportation projects require the region to speak with a unified voice • Specific examples: o Regional visitor's center o Industrial park in Becker o Regional economic roundtable _,. `.r�.'�'-- ��:s. �.: _ - :f,�'�af�1� �(��t1s ara rmpr�vir�g t�+� ��c�� ar+r� r�s� c�f fhe f��v�r. -�r�arrizatr'orr �'�s�a�r��erat FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 13 of 21 o Xcel and SherCo plant transitions and redevelopment opportunities CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: J. Collaborate Comm.pdf K. What makes you feel connected to your community? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTED TOTAL RESPONSES: 90 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Opportunities to forge connections between people and organizations • Community events and programs • High levels of civic engagement as indicated by volunteering, service organizations, etc. • Faith-based organizations and connections • Sense of community connection and relationships CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: K. Connected.pdf L. What makes you optimistic? �� •.F:'�'_� �:�LI,=:{�_ :r��r�a��m�rr� �r� ��c�� 1+�r��r �,��rt+�r�r��s, ,. -�'1ect�d Offrcra� ��p�n�ferat STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: COMMUNITY/ ELECTED / EMPLOYEES / ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL RESPONSES: 1,050 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Community's willingness to investment in new amenities for '-"`'`��F''-- `�'- `�-��C- residents like parks, trails, and unique assets like splash pad �f ��}�� '�� '��'� and others ��'�� '��'�� • Community events and activation of places and spaces �'�'�'�� • Protection and access to natural areas and assets specifically ��'� �� t�� f� �� the Mississippi River and Sherburne reserve �� '��' . • Natural assets are a regional draw and can be further leveraged '�� • Attractive and sought-after communities demonstrated by their growth in population and property values o Individual investments into personal property o Young families moving in and raising children • Strong community connections • Ability for the communities to maintain their scale, charm and character in comparison to other fast-growing parts of the region FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 14 of 21 • Presence of major employers lends stability to local economy, however tenuous • Google's planned investment is a grand demonstration of the area's potential • Capacity, infrastructure, and location are all in the region's favor o Businesses choosing to grow in the region • Growth, generally, as a positive indicator for the region • Strong school districts • Strong healthcare institutions including hospitals, urgent care, primary care, etc. • Deliberate and proactive land planning o Leveraging capacity and growth energy to achieve positive fiscal and quality of life returns o Strong and stable leadership • Increasing property values • Location and access can't be created • Very small set of the overall responses reported "very little" or "nothing" (<4% of total) CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: L. Optimistic.pdf M. What role might you play in advancing that kind of collaborative regional effort? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTED / ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL RESPONSES: 66 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Positive communication about the process and, eventually, the ;;-.`.•r,__ ,�;, i�.,�_ plan or framework '°��.�� ,�� ,�� }�� • Advocating for key elements such as greenspace, trails, or ��,�� °' other recommended regional actions • Working with the community to continue to elicit feedback and _Le��t�,� �i{�(�t�� ,�� ideas as the movement grows • Serving as a champion of the plan • Working to build greater unity across governments, communities and regional organizations CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: M. Role.pdf FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 15 of 21 N. What will make this region attractive for people to stay or move here? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: COMMUNITY/ ELECTED / EMPLOYEES / ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL RESPONSES: 1,189 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Investing in education and local schools as a central driver of opportunity and community value _.,...r:'r�_� �.�u;e��- • Expand access to amenities that leverage key community �i��r�� f�C�,' �f�,�� assets like the river, downtowns, etc. ��,�� ,�� f o Recreation is a focus and strategic investments ��,� ��, ��,��,�� 3 include trails, community centers, and a hockey arena / center o Include the arts and leisure activities -Em�iQy�e Re�s�ar��d�r�t o Recognize and leverage unique assets with the river as a primary focus, but also including the lakes, Sherburne Wildlife Management Area, etc. • Having a place for and growing more local dining, retail and service options, especially in downtowns o Generally increasing the vibrancy and activity at the community centers o Also considering entertainment and programing for community spaces; Ways to pull the community together more often and use the spaces we invest in • Turn the outside-in - Natural assets are tremendous and unique • Downtowns as the community's neighborhood • Invest in beautification initiatives • The combination of high quality of life and affordability is hard to find in the larger region especially moving south into the metro o Maintaining low relative tax rates and strong fiscal management • Maintaining the charm, character and uniqueness of the communities while using the growth energy to achieve broader community goals o Individual property maintenance is a key component of community character/value • Working to preserve the rural character outside the cities and maintaining the "small town" appeal of Becker, Big Lake and Monticello • Maintaining a safe community with a low crime rate • Improving access and variety of regional job opportunities o Investing in enabling infrastructure especially high-speed internet o Fostering small business especially those that help the community achieve other goals (vibrant downtowns, more jobs, etc.) • Continuing to manage growth with strong land planning and development review • Diversify the housing stock and provide options for each stage of life in the region o Broaden the spectrum of available housing while finding appropriate locations for each type • Access to the metro FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 16 of 21 CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: N. Attract.pdf O. What would help you feel more connected to your community? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTED TOTAL RESPONSES: 55 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • More programming and activities that help bring the community and region together including events, entertainment, etc. • More vital and vibrant downtowns that feel, and are, shared across the region • Greater community participation across the board • Better harmony achieved through real deliberation and discourse CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: O. More Connected.pdf P. What are your greatest concerns or questions? ::�;.r:'�'-_ �-,..c-�--_ :ff�Cr��d e�v�r�� o�,�c�rt�rrr��r��s irr �h� C�i�fT?�1f7��r', ,} -��ected C��craf f�es�n.r��der�t STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: COMMUNITY/ ELECTED / EMPLOYEES / ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL RESPONSES: 1,225 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Conservation of natural resources and protection from pollution • Lack of variety in public space, activities, programming, community facilities • Need for enhanced vibrancy in our major corridors and downtown areas • Livability (clean, safe) • "Creating a welcoming community" • Growth that threatens our small town feel • Lack of restaurant and amenity choices within the region • Inability to attract and sustain local businesses • Limited access to high speed internet and other technology • Rapid population growth that stresses our infrastructure capacity • Overcrowded school districts ;..�.,r,°i �_� ��:�_� ��_ :`Too ,r�� c�rowtJ� ��ra� �Ci aS �J� CGf?�f�'7�flt7l�� f��f �17�'. '. -�Qra�rr�urrrty �es��vra�d�r�t FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 17 of 21 • Educational funding being distributed in an inequitable way • High taxes and irresponsible spending • Short-sighted land-use and development decisions • Lack of follow through from local leadership • Limited housing options that span a range of price points • Housing density that changes community feel • Traffic congestion • Lack of public transit options • Loss of agricultural areas diminishes the character of the region CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: P. Concerns.pdf Q. When you talk with people who aren't from the community where your organization is located (or the area you serveJ, what do you tell them makes the community special, unique, or important? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL RESPONSES: 120 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • Each community's proximity to nature • Each community retains its small town feel while still being close to the larger metros areas • Supportive community • Business opportunity that is found within the community • The local school districts are an asset • Local leadership is accessible and supportive • Location is advantageous • Northstar is an asset that provides greater connectivity CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: Q. Share Unique.pdf ;.��.r;'r�_�� „��:��_ :`�afe �arrrmr�rr��}� �r��r ��1�� h�C�IS �`� �'�iS� t�r�rr �,��f�r�ra irr. �� -C)r?��r�rza#i�rr �es��v�a��r�t R. When you talk with people who aren't from your local community or town, what do you say makes your community special, unique, or important to you/your family? STAKEHOLDER GROUP(S) RESPONDING: ELECTED TOTAL RESPONSES: 141 REPRESENTATIVE RESPONSES: • All necessary amenities can be found within the town a�� ..;.'�°_ � �� t �;..�-__ :`�xc�lf�r� t ��r�C� ar� �f recr�a�r�� p}�or�ur��i�r� s, " -��e�t�a' ��cr�� e��a��d�ra# FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE ,.,,.�, ,,, us.. �� .,, « o Community, recreational amenities, and art o Excellent park system, lakes, and trails • Each community is civically engaged and features a unique spirit • Each community features a small town feel / rural atmosphere • Good local schools • The close proximity / access to the larger cities nearby CLICK HERE FOR A LINK TO ALL COMMENTS: R. Unique Comm.pdf FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 19 of 21 The following section provides an analysis of the question responses to the Framework 2030 Round 1 survey organized by four stakeholder groups shown below. Planning NEXT reviewed all comments received by each group to identify shared and unique themes. The following table provides a high-level review of each group. They are representative responses to help the reader better understand the 7,000+ comments received during round 1. A full database of all responses is also available for reading and review here: https://re�ionalplannin�partnership.or�/framework2030. Summary of Themes from the Stakeholder Groups cRoss COMMUNITY ELECTED OFFICIALS EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATIONS CUTTING (2�564 responses) (961) (3,056) (569) TOPICS Misc. • Preferring change or • Need for improved • Thoughtful planning • Ability to create growth that is organic regional collaboration and mindful or partnerships rather than considerate between • Retaining small town competition development government, feel business and • Networking regional nonprofits • Increased access to assets and amenities high-speed internet to broaden citizen's • Leadership that can view of "my execute on vision community" goals • Leadership that is • Communities working forward thinking together to improve vision guided the region • Stronger civic • Small town feel engagement • Have supportive, welcoming community Housing • Well-planned growth • Understanding • Ensure housing is that meets housing profile and affordable community character limitations and helps achieve common goals FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 20 of 21 cRoss COMMUNITY ELECTED OFFICIALS EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATIONS CUTTING (2�564 responses) (961) (3,056) (569) TOPICS Economy • Desire for • Focus on job growth • Increase community • Grow business and locally-focused or to provide local vibrancy through attract good paying "authentic" shops employment opt. events, activities, and jobs and restaurants that art add to the vibrancy • Growing business and and character of facilitating local job • Expanding the job place growth pool Transport ,:; • Addressing current • Proximity and access • Capitalize on -ation and .� relativ� and emergent traffic to work and the advantageous Mobility issues metro areas location • Emphasis on public transit and other multi-modal options Assets • Desire for a clean, • Building vibrancy • Expand restaurant • Make the area a and safe community that through events, and business options destination Amenities has plenty of amenities, art and activities and investment in places • Quality local school programming districts • Quality schools and • Building a vibrant districts that are well downtown funded and reinforce atmosphere replete youth opportunity with restaurants, and long-term shops and property value entertainment • Outdoor recreational opportunities FRAMEWORK 2030 � Stakeholder Engagement Report: ROUND ONE � DRAFT � Page 21 of 21 N � o a . .. . _ d a O � ?. . Q�=' � A £ u�a � . " c� �' .. . " m O L a C � � � a d,� V O= � �.O'�� =�a ° � �°'�a � a�� z j � M d� �, Q-�� Q = a+ � �a ' 1�.. N � m . w u�= z _ � a�„ a�_ �y� � d a •- � ¢ � �' � r , ��'4 � - � °up'� r � 'o � N U C � � � o `�`-- a° 6 • d � Q � rn N C • 6 a a � � C � � U � O � d I _ � !, O M o � �_.. k 1 0 � L N o m N�; AI �y�.- �'" � o� o 6 �' tr. f' � U i L _,: ./ .� C N p F � , �� '-I� , a�`i +�, � o� /f F�, � �, I �> a v � .._%i, �� 4 I � o � � � � c� o�/ 6�. -. i��i ° um, o .� . +3.� a".�`+ } 6 � - � m :' -- -- - r � v c z � r� i ,�� I � � 'p C'� Q N i p N� °' 3� � ;, a I " � � � v 6 � � s�' N �� j/ V 3 e' I � �� O � o .� � � �^, � - 4' C 6 � O � N _ m m �v �v ,-, ,-, � o ro 0 N °° jf Tj bD � i � 7 � u 0 N �n C � 7 � O w- � � {[n =.] O - "� ' �7 N � � �n � "—_ '. — �i .O +'' p � N � [n � �_ p� � C � �.. Z � `I�'."' _ � Y 'a p � .. � � J a=a � � a0 � � -O � � Q m `m m ...........................................y ..�................................................................................................................. � N u � c a � O a O � v C 3 O Ol a � O O N � � a � m � E � H c' �� 6 H C � N � � N o •� � a � � -° d "- 0 � N ;� E t � � C L o 3�" -� m �� L (V O P'1 a� o � � • p ro s o N�� N ip > {� R � O T O � o N .� N o �� va N � � ^ o � = O O o M000 v N ` � O � � � O v � � c � E H N � N * o � � � � � N = ,�`, a = d C � � 0 Nws o 0 � O N 3 - O `� ` d� � � ^�R=a � N -� Z W � , � d d y � � .. .. � 3 E� E y E L _ �_� a3 a� v o � o � aLL aLL �� •� � 3LL 3 3 w m'^ o �' m � � y � � � - _ a v ' � . C d N�� K� K 3 K O Q j� � C � C +-�+ �' � o O � O � M � � O m� m Y o � d� _ O N A\ � � ° � 3 v� ; °� � � � � � � � � � : �m 0 N C � C �.�+ ¢ � 0 .� U w N C O � � �ry. [l7 - Ab b O +Y {� yj dpo . r �46p�6 y�6 (jjss y�6 M � � � � � � , 6 O � a�i d i - a � � N � N O C � � � V 'a 0 0 � � � 6 � �oV m�� m � ,o 6 N y� �.� 6 o,� E � � = 6 O O � a v � w � a � "C -O +-�+ � ry = � � . 3 'i� � .�� ,_�..,� o o � o E o m /� € �, a \ g� � y� � a � 7}�/ ? i N d � � � � �n a V : 01� �w o > asi i � N Q o C o -C /� `� �`o � C a � '= 6 6 V 1\ � U 6 _ �� C � � � C a=i N � � O Yl O ry — N S ' ' N � -O 6 � � T _ � � � o � � 6 � N 'a � -C ,L .N � � �n C C � ° 3 '°- �n � � � m �" ■N o m Q Q 0 N L�� 6 �g lie 6 O �a � �' T T � u > � ` a O o d a O 'sD 3 a o � `� i M �-C � m o a N a �' a� o � � � C � /1 � o � �o � Q � i O O a�_, (� Q � .. �� ii d � � I � p6j � V O � j a � I—� ■ N U,�r• � � ~ a o � � � C � � N 2 N O i m �n � u � ya I � VI ■ � � � O m 1� �O � � I w �� —¢ •o � C � W Cv � O W•- � �� a�v: V p� O� � � � F ^ i�:� o + � � � id �n'- �P`� o C •= y� � .. � c a ��S- f >a "o �o ��p�'� � o � C�a-.��. p°'�i a � d' � �� a � o a o � + 3 �.: � � : � O N � ' � a � � � ��G � � � �� _ � _ �a � o � o =a°o� � 0 3�0 � �n.- fy• �;� � � �� f �F�ry � a� �� ~ ��.� d x�. � � �� oo� � � ', ¢ N ♦ v+=do • . a �f ^ T � o r o C a+ o0 m + "- • o IC R m c� � � � # o��o C' ♦ i+ L J_ � Oi � 2 c � � � � � � � "w�� "��o "�Q � o u o � � f. f. f. f. f. � N V � n � � � '3 C � a � V N ; y * N -a� � N � .�. a a ' z . - %� � d Z .�`. a m � o R � � � -� W 'o � V ++ � '^ a, � � i � > � .�a �E � 3 w ". � f0 3 � a �o�L M�/�= R�o " � Y - � �o� �a�; W i �� m` � 3 O V�a �°' ��G7 yoa� O a a o �_ C O d m� � " C � `^ 'a `° � . � O � C - -a � R O o� M v eo � ` s _ � �= a � _ �'r 3 �' V � `� ct �.° �w �n "�i � a ¢ _ o o° T M �n _ � V' � y O C w ai /� V ' 6 ��i . a . q _ a � a " o � c v�, � � � : o � E m a rr .a z > �i � � � ,,,� v � � ~ � � � o a � R � � oi w `� i m y� 'G � 'o o�n � � � a � 3 d� a'^ o N' O o � E ry � �n 'a �, � � -a v -a � � :; _ +z.� m �n � G� � a � � � � � �, a � � 6 3� � � c� L=* d� 6 O J N'c� N ai � " d m V1 � d� f0 N R� N x - � R � m o ° � a +� a � � 'G � °' s a ° O ++ o c' E >� i' .a-i � � ° O H a � � = o -� � C�� c c � �a � a, R ¢ �'` G7 ^ a s a � � a,� oa a � �� 0'i�aa � : ; � 3 ��G�� ,� o � 3 y '° a m m =� r� N R�� a € rn N�.� � ♦ 'i e - �� o � ° d m °° 3Y a� �'G J E� J d O.' � � � � � n �„ti � � V a � a � � X 6 C C -.� � � � d '� Q� p O a° o� ss.�� ..��•�,.� . r 'v� E . a � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . z � � �'�o 'G 0� �� aL+ d.� J�, G7 PI : � v6 -ao3� 3 R�� " � � o' M�� i 0 R N�� i?j�-o� P sas � _ 6 � Jd � 1/� ry � o �/�� L% ,d,� � � %G d \ 's-' � a y�9 �^N m� V� C1 3� � S� o /i°o o c "' bs y.7, + > o R C a, � 4 l -n " O 4 �j �� L Q 3 a� a� � c a L '�' ��""�i 4�/a� � i¢ N i= 0 3 P- s�o�� a � � Z� � Q. i- w d'� �a � -a `�' � � ' �:r � ��O o r �'1 6 T ^ - q�/,( �J. � e dG a o d i %/� - � �� N T n-� s�'{d "A o o o � L �� id o�� PS� � r . sa w E�C N GGo �a�'i C „-sd 6y0 1 2 m �- ��1d J +n �'� � 'p�"4 y � � w� � � � � V ry �0�6 � " p € Y' � C%�b � v� a j, A b0 b0 �a� � 6G �Ja ) � 2 H .� � V G p b�✓p V L� � � ��b � N 6 „e �`o' �:J C N �n 7 „-� � Y'� � ��d £ � C /�'�q � ,6 � � C a��i � �- � g � �.- o y�y O � u �n � �o .a � .�o �n �'^ o 0 0 0 � o � � a� � Ol � rv rv ti ti r J y�j �0 � � � S�G/ .3 � � c p m � 6 Q u-�a d2�i O o� • L y� 6 E� � O N N N .°.`. .rd46 �b = C m o G rn 3 a� a� m� G s � � m° s�� E o� c�"J°°�+ o � V a � � � i �a � �' m � �n r � �-�o;s w .� � 3 a 1 �, a ,d �� O �, � o o'o � G p V T M 3 � A, �'v 6> �/� L R � '^ �+-c., � m o ' � W V i+ 3 °' � � V a' ^� .� N _. . _ . . - �'2 � �� /�/� d=� o N o o�� s s � p� C W � G7 o a' °� �' p� � o, o, w 3 .�, .�, .�, .�, .�, .�, .�, .�, � o n.� � R�G g� •N 3 N°' o � � o � � f. f. f. a°��' � y�� m o, .g � v �� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I� �" 1 ' � � -�` _ � , � � � o � 34 i' o O \ 1-�� I�" P �. f I �, v N Yl 6 'a �} H �1 � ,� 5 -1 � � b4 % � 6 � � , 4�� j a;`�i �� .i � 3° � +� a € � � a � o � o ffi �.i<�;�`i� : �'..,, � � �R a � o .� � � � - 6j � � r 3 -. . � LLl f 1`�� `•""-o � d 5 R a m n �,= N � L �� ' o • r;. � � �' } i , sv � � �J � � � o ❑ a ,� � � '" � % ° '� f �_ � T� "c. � � m �v � p � u m'� E r, � o �` -. . .�,'fJ ,- � a�� ^ a '�- a d ~ � R � � � _ � •� w w _. �3 E � � o m � �=� �'.�-'' � ' . 3 3 � � a .s°'. o '^ , o �-� • y '� � .� i/y} � � � o � � � � � c' � v " o,� o a o � � ..�; �E�� 0 0 T � 3 0 - a.�, 6 � a~, � � � � Es _ � d o � - '��j �,� � I � r � ? �i � $' 'o, •� -n o � o •- � ''- o ��. o '� � o n"':� - -� ,� � b � � a u o $ .ti � rv z .__ � � a�� I.. t I�;^., B� n 3± p� N�n ,. � a o �.I � ' _, � : �oo�»o � _ :� ��/ � _ : � _ � �, � E � � � a o �1 � � �� - � � �` d �. � � o y :.....�� U � w �. 1 °J � .� -n � � ~ a ''�`� V �` 13 a a � � _ . a� � � �, `� •- � m � � � N v� A . .� y V �k Q _. . � � � .....� , o Q � R � - o a y . �1 'L . .� ? m ,� , o a v � u a o � � . ,..� � c � ., � = N 3u ,� : "1'-- c m y� � �� - � � � � � � � .�-. o � � - � l^9� . ,a • � u ''-�' £ . � � � 1A � {n � � d - � o s � d � , a C iR �� g� � .� w � � m a + � �� a � ---I .p �n •� � s 'o !'` � � �' � ?� , . ' °' N = " � a - '' � « . a -c ¢ � �� N 3 � O � � O � � O � Q I b``sr our p, � Es� s`��on po � , U��09� a �aaaap a �� 9�,� ay� �a �,� � S/� � O � O M O N � O � U � � � O U L � � � 4A � 0 L �--� c/') '.7 ca L1 O � � � � ` 41 � L O N � � O � � a"'' � � L � O v SZ L Q c6 O L �7 � � m U C V � ca �1 L � U L � � � O U � O N �L 0 � � L � � U � Q � t1,p t1A .� O 4A � � � � 0 U :� � � � s U L � � i C � GJ N � 00 • • • • • •