Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 07-13-2020REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 13, 2020 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Mississippi Room 3:30 p.m. 3:30 p.m. 2021 Budget Workshop Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from June 22, 2020 • Regular Meeting Minutes from June 22, 2020 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates F. Council Liaison Updates • Planning Commission • EDA • CMRP G. Department Updates • COVID-19 Update and Discussion • City Administrator Update • Housing Survey Update • Construction Update 2. Consent Agenda —All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-50 accepting donation of $11,000 from the Ellison Family for Fire Department rehab trailer E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-51 accepting grant from the Central Minnesota Arts Board (CMAB) in the amount of $3,500 F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-52 appointing election judges for the 2020 primary and general elections, including judges for the Absentee Ballot Board G. Consideration of approving a Massage Enterprise License for Massage by Rebecca located at 113 W. Broadway H. Consideration of approving an upgrade to the Laserfiche systems to the Avante System at a cost of $47,399.69 I. Consideration of re -approving the Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement for Camping World First Addition/Maas Addition J. Consideration of approving an amendment to the approved conditions for simple subdivision for Patricia Olson K. Consideration of renewing the letter of agreement with Xcel Energy for emergency response to the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant L. Consideration of approving a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 728 square foot residential detached Accessory Building — Major in an R-1 (Single -Family Residence) District. Applicant: Kevin & Sara Haman 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of authorizing a letter of support for Duffy Development for PUD flexibility as related to a tax credit application for a 53 -unit affordable housing project at 7th Street and Elm Street, Great River Addition B. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-54 expressing support for the proposed use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in the amount of $500,000 for a 53 -unit Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment development by Duffy Development Company Inc. 5. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 13, 2020 — 3:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. 3:30 p.m. 2021 Budget Workshop 3. Adj ournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 22, 2020 — 5 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Bill Fair, Jim Davidson, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None. Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Angela Schumann, Ron Hackenmueller, Tracy Ergen, Rachel Leonard, Matt Leonard, Sarah Rathlisberger, and Jennifer Schreiber 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. 2. 4:30 p.m. City Administrator Executive Recruiter Informational Sessions Tracy Ergen, Human Resources, gave a brief overview. There are two companies being interviewed. Ms. Ergen introduced both before their presentations. They were each allowed 45 minutes. The recruiters that presented were Liza Donabauer, DDA HR Inc. and Sharon Krumpp, Baker Tilley. Following the presentations there was discussion among City Council. There was consensus that either company could complete the task, however, they decided to go with DDA HR Inc. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of selecting DDA HR Inc. to lead the recruitment for City Administrator. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Council Special Meeting Minutes —June 22, 2020 City Administrator REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 22, 2020 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: Councilmember Davidson 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Agenda Councilmember Gabler requested that discussion on Block 52 be added to the agenda. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the agenda with the added item. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Approval of Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from May 26, 2020 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the special meeting minutes of May 26, 2020. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meeting Minutes from May 26, 2020 Councilmember Fair moved approval of the regular meeting minutes of May 26, 2020. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments Scott Cutsforth, 8634 Fairhill Ln, requested that the City Council review the use of recreational vehicles (ATV, golf carts, etc.) on city roads. Staff will review the item and bring back a recommendation. E. Council Liaison Updates • EDA — Councilmember Hilgart noted that the EDA discussed the following at their last two meetings: selection of MSA Professional Services to conduct housing study; COVID-19 Small Business Emergency Grant Program; demolition quote for 300 4th St. E.; TIF pre -application for 53 unit low income housing apartments; approval of four Small Business Emergency Grants; cancellation of lodging study; and prospect list. • Library Board — Councilmember Gabler provided an update and noted that the library has curbside pickup at the Monticello location. They are working on opening. They completed a lighting upgrade and some painting jobs. City Council Minutes —June 22, 2020 Page 1 1 3 F. Department Update • COVID-19 update was provided. • City Administrator Update. Jeff O'Neill provided an update on the following: 1. The annual meeting of the Coalition of Utility Cities is on June 24 at 9 a.m. by Zoom. 2. The ribbon cutting for the new Fire Station will take place with their open house in October. • Construction Update — 1. Briarwood Turn lanes paving was completed. 2. Encouraged residents to sign up for email updates on the 2020 Street Project. 3. The Riverwalk trail retaining blocks have been delivered and installation will begin. 4. The city is working with the project manager for the landscaping project at Fallon Ave. overpass. They are working on irrigation and keeping the plants alive. 5. Chip seal project is scheduled to begin June 29. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $2,419,867.41. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for Finance and terminations for MCC. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-47 accepting donations from SPOE Lawyers ($150), Von Hanson's Meats ($150), Resurrection Church ($25), and Monticello Family Dentistry ($25), to be used for 2021 Walk & Roll event. Recommendation: Resolution approving contributions was adopted. E. Consideration of accepting COVID-19 Preparedness Plan. Recommendation: Accepted the COVID-19 Preparedness Plan. F. Consideration of approving a request for a Simple Subdivision of one existing parcel resulting in two buildable parcels. Applicant: Patricia Olson. Recommendation: Approved the simple subdivision for 224 3rd Street East, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z and based on the findings in Resolution PC -2018-018. G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-49 accepting bids and awarding contract to All Elements Inc. for the Community Center Roofing Project, City Project No. 200004 including the base bid and bid alternate 1 for a total amount City Council Minutes —June 22, 2020 Page 2 13 of $338,236. Recommended: Adopted Resolution 2020-49 awarding contract to All Elements Inc. in the amount of $338,236. H. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-48 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $111,634.82 to Eureka Construction for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2020-48 authorizing final payment to Eureka Construction in the amount of $111,634.81. 3 Add -On Item: • Councilmember Gabler added discussion on the appearance of Block 52. The area looks blighted and the grass needs mowing. Matt Leonard, City Engineer/Public Works Director, will take a look at the area for needs of maintenance. • Councilmember Hilgart requested that Ann Mosack, MCC Director, provide an update on the opening of the MCC. Ms. Mosack gave a brief update with more opening on July 6. 4. Adiournment: By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:09 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes —June 22, 2020 Page 3 13 City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 2A. Consideration of approving payment of bills (SR) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $5,749,472.37. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable To Be Paid Proof List User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 06/30/2020 - 4:29PM Batch: 00202.07.2020 - 202.07.2020 Liquor Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description � ary 0 � Monticello Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3491 3422626 6/16/2020 151.50 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer 3422626 Total: 151.50 3423755 6/23/2020 227.30 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer 3423755 Total: 227.30 3424014 6/24/2020 29.60 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer 3424014 Total: 29.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPA 408.40 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1065 101551300 6/23/2020 19.60 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale- mix 101551300 6/23/2020 0.09 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 101551300 Total: 19.69 84467800 6/16/2020 105.66 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 1 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 84467800 6/16/2020 244.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 84467800 6/16/2020 7,986.46 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 84467800 Total: 8,336.12 84474700 6/16/2020 84.20 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 84474700 6/16/2020 0.53 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 84474700 Total: 84.73 84513600 6/18/2020 2,576.85 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 84513600 6/18/2020 28.29 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 84513600 Total: 2,605.14 84515400 6/17/2020 -897.25 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor credit inv. 0084467800 84515400 6/17/2020 -12.60 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight credit inv. 0084467800 84515400 Total: -909.85 84516500 6/18/2020 118.45 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 84516500 6/18/2020 1.55 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 84516500 Total: 120.00 84518100 6/18/2020 32.55 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 84518100 6/18/2020 2,592.50 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 84518100 Total: 2,625.05 AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 2 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description 84527900 6/18/2020 609-49750-425100 Liquor 84527900 6/18/2020 609-49750-433300 Freight 84527900 Total: 84579700 6/23/2020 609-49750-433300 Freight 84579700 6/23/2020 609-49750-425300 Wine 84579700 6/23/2020 609-49750-425100 Liquor 84579700 Total: BELLBOY CORPORATIO BERNICK'S 1067 102262 CR 6/17/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer 102262 CR Total: 79778 CR 5/20/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer 79778 CR Total: 92979 6/17/2020 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable 92979 Total: 92980 6/17/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer 92980 Total: 276.08 0.00 07/01/2020 resale- liquor 9.45 0.00 07/01/2020 -16.75 0.00 freight 285.53 resale- beer corrected invoice 18.35 0.00 07/01/2020 29.30 0.00 freight 37.50 0.00 07/01/2020 29.30 resale- wine 1,488.28 0.00 07/01/2020 resale- liquor 1,544.13 14,710.54 -44.80 0.00 07/01/2020 resale- beer credit corrected inv. -44.80 -16.75 0.00 07/01/2020 resale- beer corrected invoice -16.75 29.30 0.00 07/01/2020 resale- soda pop corrected inv.79778 29.30 2,970.99 0.00 07/01/2020 resale- beer 2,970.99 Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference False False False False False False False False False AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 96064 6/24/2020 162.72 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale- soda pop 96064 Total: 162.72 96065 6/24/2020 3,728.95 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale- beer 96065 6/24/2020 301.20 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale- beer n/a 96065 Total: 4,030.15 BERNICK'S Total: 7,131.61 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS, LLC 4328 1081145730 6/19/2020 1,643.88 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 1081145730 6/19/2020 683.22 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 1081145730 6/19/2020 42.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale- mix 1081145730 6/19/2020 26.27 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1081145730 Total: 2,395.37 1081145731 6/19/2020 464.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale- beer 1081145731 Total: 464.00 1081145732 6/19/2020 96.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 1081145732 6/19/2020 1.93 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1081145732 Total: 97.93 1081145733 6/19/2020 3.03 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 4 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1081145733 6/19/2020 235.34 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 1081145733 Total: 238.37 1081148458 6/26/2020 104.95 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale- mix 1081148458 6/26/2020 40.43 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1081148458 6/26/2020 750.70 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 1081148458 6/26/2020 2,069.69 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 1081148458 Total: 2,965.77 1081148459 6/26/2020 171.85 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale- beer 1081148459 Total: 171.85 BREAKTHRU BEVERAG 6,333.29 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 4646 2427381 6/18/2020 22,481.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer 2427381 6/18/2020 169.45 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale - beer n/a 2427381 Total: 22,650.45 2428120 6/18/2020 -11.60 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer credit 2428120 Total: -11.60 2430485 6/25/2020 15,555.93 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 5 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 2430485 6/25/2020 195.75 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale - beer n/a 2430485 6/25/2020 59.97 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425500 Miscellaneous Non -Taxable resale -juice 2430485 Total: 15,811.65 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SA 38,450.50 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC 1095 19353 6/10/2020 468.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 19353 Total: 468.00 CARLOS CREEK WINER 468.00 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 1129 112-03474 6/15/2020 23,703.20 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer 112-03474 Total: 23,703.20 112-03488 6/17/2020 4,822.90 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer 112-03488 6/17/2020 136.80 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale - beer n/a 112-03488 Total: 4,959.70 112-03526 6/22/2020 165.95 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale - beer n/a 112-03526 6/22/2020 50,532.55 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer 112-03526 Total: 50,698.50 AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 6 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description 112-03527 0.00 6/19/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer 112-03527 Total: 1,244.25 112-03540 6/24/2020 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable 0.00 112-03540 False 6/24/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer n/a 5,842.10 112-03540 Total: 07/01/2020 112-03546 6/24/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer 5,968.10 112-03546 6/24/2020 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable 0.00 07/01/2020 112-03546 Total: 1246699 resale - beer 6/23/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer 0.00 07/01/2020 False 1246699 Total: 1247327 6/24/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer -43.40 1247327 Total: 07/01/2020 1248432 6/26/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer -43.40 1248432 Total: 76-01030 0.00 6/26/2020 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer credit 76-01030 Total: -83.20 DAHLHEIMER BEVERA Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 1,244.25 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - beer 1,244.25 126.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - beer n/a 5,842.10 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - beer 5,968.10 72.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - beer 90.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - beer n/a 162.00 -43.40 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - beer credit -43.40 -83.20 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - beer credit -83.20 230.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - beer 230.00 1,469.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - beer 1,469.00 88,308.15 AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference DICK FAMILY, INC. 5201 1217000095 6/23/2020 -12.50 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425200 Beer resale- beer credit 1217000095 Total: -12.50 1241000048 6/16/2020 59.60 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425200 Beer resale- beer 1241000048 Total: 59.60 1241000053 6/23/2020 305.30 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425200 Beer resale- beer 1241000053 Total: 305.30 964005122 6/23/2020 228.50 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425200 Beer resale- beer 964005122 Total: 228.50 DICK FAMILY, INC. Tota 580.90 DISGRUNTLED BREWERY, LLC., DISGRUNTLED BREWING 5340 709 6/25/2020 240.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425200 Beer resale- beer 709 Total: 240.00 DISGRUNTLED BREWE 240.00 HAIRLESS DOG BREWING, LLC. 5417 1181 6/15/2020 123.08 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale - beer n/a AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 1181 Total: 123.08 HAIRLESS DOG BREWIN 123.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1263 104517 6/16/2020 -56.05 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor credit inv. # 1555857 104517 Total: -56.05 104742 6/17/2020 -14.63 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor credit inv. #1554822 104742 6/17/2020 -5.51 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine credit inv. #1554822 104742 Total: -20.14 1580962 6/19/2020 5,348.10 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 1580962 6/19/2020 91.43 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1580962 Total: 5,439.53 1580963 6/19/2020 29.50 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1580963 6/19/2020 812.45 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale - wine 1580963 6/19/2020 40.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale - wine n/a 1580963 Total: 881.95 1582208 6/23/2020 39.04 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1582208 6/23/2020 2,835.37 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale -liquor AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 9 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 1582208 Total: 2,874.41 1582209 6/23/2020 78.23 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1582209 6/23/2020 2,847.74 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale - wine 1582209 6/23/2020 142.95 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale - wine n/a 1582209 Total: 3,068.92 1583324 6/24/2020 57.49 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1583324 6/24/2020 5,386.80 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 1583324 Total: 5,444.29 1583325 6/24/2020 32.78 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1583325 6/24/2020 1,411.48 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 1583325 Total: 1,444.26 1583326 6/24/2020 48.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425200 Beer resale- beer 1583326 Total: 48.00 1586297 6/26/2020 5,470.73 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 1586297 6/26/2020 62.80 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1586297 Total: 5,533.53 1586298 6/26/2020 32.78 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1586298 6/26/2020 1,099.80 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 10 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 1586298 Total: 1,132.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS L 25,791.28 KIWI KAI IMPORTS, INC. 1273 93806 6/25/2020 1,605.77 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 93806 6/25/2020 17.50 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 93806 Total: 1,623.27 KIWI KAI IMPORTS, INC 1,623.27 LUCID BREWING, LLC 5457 7279 6/24/2020 230.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425200 Beer resale - beer 7279 Total: 230.00 LUCID BREWING, LLC T 230.00 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP 1303 303289 6/25/2020 1,728.01 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425500 Miscellaneous Non -Taxable resale - cigarettes; juice 303289 6/25/2020 361.31 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale - tobacco; soda pop; barware; etc 303289 Total: 2,089.32 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & 2,089.32 AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 11 0 0 0 0 0 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference MILLNER VINEYARD, LLC 4667 261820-50 6/18/2020 968.40 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 261820-50 Total: 968.40 MILLNER VINEYARD, L 968.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 1427 6047383 6/17/2020 1,608.95 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 6047383 6/17/2020 16.39 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 6047383 Total: 1,625.34 6049167 6/19/2020 2.98 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 6049167 6/19/2020 298.65 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 6049167 Total: 301.63 6049168 6/19/2020 152.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 6049168 6/19/2020 144.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale- mix 6049168 6/19/2020 741.75 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 6049168 6/19/2020 28.31 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 6049168 Total: 1,066.06 6049923 6/23/2020 3.73 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 6049923 6/23/2020 439.70 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 12 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Type PO # Close PO Line # Account Number Description Reference 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 6049923 Total: 443.43 6049924 6/23/2020 13.41 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 6049924 6/23/2020 505.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale - wine 6049924 Total: 518.41 6050766 6/24/2020 1,188.85 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale - wine 6050766 6/24/2020 38.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 6050766 6/24/2020 29.05 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 6050766 Total: 1,255.90 6050785 6/24/2020 2,686.99 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 6050785 6/24/2020 31.96 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 6050785 Total: 2,718.95 6051219 6/24/2020 336.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 6051219 Total: 336.00 6051220 6/24/2020 733.50 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 6051220 Total: 733.50 6051221 6/24/2020 603.60 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 6051221 Total: 603.60 AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 13 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 6052847 6/26/2020 1,526.80 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 6052847 6/26/2020 14.90 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 6052847 Total: 1,541.70 6052848 6/26/2020 229.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425300 Wine resale - wine 6052848 6/26/2020 8.47 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-433300 Freight 2,857.69 0.00 freight False 6052848 Total: 237.47 resale - liquor PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 11,381.99 0.00 07/01/2020 False RUE 38 LLC 4781 8418 6/16/2020 536.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425300 Wine resale wine 8418 6/16/2020 6.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 8418 Total: 542.00 RUE 38 LLC Total: 542.00 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC 3309 1963555 6/18/2020 2,857.69 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 1963555 6/18/2020 31.74 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1963555 Total: 2,889.43 1963556 6/18/2020 33.95 0.00 07/01/2020 False 609-49750-433300 Freight freight AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Invoice Number Invoice Date Account Number Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Description Type PO # Close PO Reference Line # 1963556 6/18/2020 1,768.51 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 1963556 Total: 1,802.46 1965705 6/25/2020 30.81 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1965705 6/25/2020 3,326.18 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 1965705 Total: 3,356.99 1965706 6/25/2020 1,024.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 1965706 6/25/2020 28.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 1965706 Total: 1,052.00 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S W 9,100.88 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 1552 2539565 6/17/2020 723.65 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale soda pop 2539565 Total: 723.65 VIKING COCA COLA BO 723.65 VINOCOPIA 1684 0258227 6/11/2020 123.83 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 0258227 6/11/2020 160.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 0258227 6/11/2020 10.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 15 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 0258227 Total: 293.83 0258591 6/18/2020 16.50 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 0258591 6/18/2020 297.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 0258591 6/18/2020 272.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 0258591 6/18/2020 120.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale- mix 0258591 Total: 705.50 0258598 6/18/2020 505.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale- liquor 0258598 6/18/2020 12.50 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 0258598 Total: 517.50 259017 6/25/2020 120.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425400 Miscellaneous Taxable resale - mix 259017 6/25/2020 18.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-433300 Freight freight 259017 6/25/2020 432.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale - wine 259017 6/25/2020 306.17 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425100 Liquor resale - liquor 259017 Total: 876.17 VINOCOPIA Total: 2,393.00 WINE COMPANY, THE 1572 144769 6/22/2020 400.00 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 609-49750-425300 Wine resale- wine 144769 6/22/2020 9.90 0.00 07/01/2020 False 0 AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 16 Invoice Number Invoice Date Amount Quantity Payment Date Task Account Number Description 609-49750-433300 Freight 07/01/2020 False 144769 Total: resale - wine 409.90 WINE COMPANY, THE T 409.90 WINE MERCHANTS INC freight 1573 0.00 07/01/2020 7288121 6/19/2020 439.68 609-49750-425300 Wine 0.00 07/01/2020 7288121 6/19/2020 5.22 609-49750-433300 Freight 7288121 Total: 444.90 7288351 6/23/2020 640.00 609-49750-425300 Wine 7288351 6/23/2020 14.90 609-49750-433300 Freight 7288351 Total: 654.90 7289109 6/26/2020 12.67 609-49750-433300 Freight 7289109 6/26/2020 442.34 609-49750-425300 Wine 7289109 Total: 455.01 WINE MERCHANTS INC 1,554.81 Report Total: 213,562.97 freight Type PO # Close PO Line # Reference 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - wine 0.00 07/01/2020 False freight 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale - wine 0.00 07/01/2020 False freight 0.00 07/01/2020 False freight 0.00 07/01/2020 False resale- wine The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/13/20 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -To Be Paid Proof List (06/30/2020 - 4:29 PM) Page 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 07/01/2020 - 11:41AM Batch: 00215.06.2020 - 215.06.2020 Xcel/CPE Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Moiiii6effo Y Reference Vendor: 1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 5,647.61 Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 06/30/2020 5863599-6 - Animal Shelter 27.59 06/30/2020 101-42700-438100 06/30/2020 8235331-9 - Prairie Center 55.08 06/30/2020 101-41941-438100 06/30/2020 5828859-8 - Storage Garage 23.03 06/30/2020 101-41940-438100 06/30/2020 5864452-7 - Library 151.90 06/30/2020 101-45501-438100 06/30/2020 5837384-6 - Publc Works 252.38 06/30/2020 101-43127-438100 06/30/2020 6401745330-5 - 349 W Broadway 45.69 06/30/2020 101-45204-438100 06/30/2020 5788570-9 - Hi Way Liquor 117.46 06/30/2020 609-49754-438100 06/30/2020 5804618-6 - Parks (Fallon) 17.06 06/30/2020 101-45201-438100 06/30/2020 8235333-5 - P.C. (U Fab) 32.31 06/30/2020 101-41941-438100 06/30/2020 5843395-4 - DMV 29.00 06/30/2020 217-41990-438100 06/30/2020 5768542-2 - MCC 1,440.10 06/30/2020 226-45126-438100 06/30/2020 5768542-2 - City Hall 62.27 06/30/2020 101-41940-438100 06/30/2020 5820786-1 - Public Works 85.87 06/30/2020 101-43127-438100 06/30/2020 5799425-3 - Public Works 175.90 06/30/2020 101-43127-438100 06/30/2020 5821009-5 - Fire Station 157.91 06/30/2020 101-42200-438100 06/30/2020 5768542-2 - National Guard 31.14 06/30/2020 101-42800-438100 06/30/2020 5768542-2 - Senior Center 23.35 06/30/2020 101-45175-438100 06/30/2020 8000015233-2 - WWTP 2,353.17 06/30/2020 602-49480-438100 06/30/2020 5806932-9 - Parks 19.23 06/30/2020 101-45201-438100 06/30/2020 5799427-9 - Public Works 48.58 06/30/2020 101-43127-438100 06/30/2020 11077481-7 - New Fire Station 373.62 06/30/2020 101-42200-438100 06/30/2020 6402123338-8 - 112 W River St 124.97 06/30/2020 101-45201-438100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/01/2020 - 11:41 AM) Page 1 Check Total: 5,647.61 Vendor: 5188 HEALTHY CONTRIBUTIONS Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 7/1/2020 AARP Supplement/At Your Best 6.65 06/30/2020 226-45122-430900 Check Total: 6.65 Vendor: 5415 MII LIFE INSURANCE INC Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 39471901 FSA Medical 190.00 06/30/2020 101-00000-217300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/01/2020 - 11:41 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/01/2020 - 11:41 AM) Page 2 Check Total: 190.00 Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True 6/17/2020 May Sales Tax - General 83.20 06/30/2020 101-00000-208100 6/17/2020 May Sales Tax - General -0.20 06/30/2020 101-00000-362900 6/17/2020 May Waste Tax - General 110.24 06/30/2020 101-00000-208120 6/17/2020 May Waste Tax - General -2.24 06/30/2020 101-00000-362900 6/17/2020 May Sales Tax - MCC -361.70 06/30/2020 226-00000-208100 6/17/2020 May Sales Tax - MCC -0.30 06/30/2020 226-45122-362900 6/17/2020 May Sales Tax - Water 1,076.19 06/30/2020 601-00000-208100 6/17/2020 May Sales Tax - Water -0.19 06/30/2020 601-00000-362900 6/17/2020 May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 76,203.02 06/30/2020 609-00000-208100 6/17/2020 May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor -0.02 06/30/2020 609-00000-362900 6/22/2020 Hi Way Liquor Sales Tax Accelerated Payment f 68,583.00 06/30/2020 609-00000-208100 Check Total: 145,691.00 Vendor: 4732 MONEY MOVERS, INC. Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True 130009 Fitness Rewards - May 2020 7.00 06/30/2020 226-45122-430900 Check Total: 7.00 Vendor: 3259 MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 6/30/2020 June Cash Receipts - Membership Fee 1,792.94 06/30/2020 226-45127-347910 6/30/2020 June Cash Receipts - NSF Fee -50.00 06/30/2020 226-45122-341081 6/30/2020 June Cash Receipts - Park Rental 102.44 06/30/2020 101-45201-347100 6/30/2020 June Cash Receipts - Programs Non Tax/Lesson 96.00 06/30/2020 226-45127-347930 6/30/2020 June Cash Receipts - Wedding Rental 2,607.68 06/30/2020 226-45123-347570 6/30/2020 June Cash Receipts - Room Rental 905.24 06/30/2020 226-45123-347010 6/30/2020 June Cash Receipts - Charge To Account -433.00 06/30/2020 226-00000-115031 6/30/2020 June Cash Receipts - Sales Tax - General 7.56 06/30/2020 101-00000-208100 6/30/2020 June Cash Receipts - Sales Tax - MCC 391.31 06/30/2020 226-00000-208100 Check Total: 5,420.17 Vendor: 1565 WELLS FARGO CORP TRUST SERVICE Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True 6/19/2020 Additional Investment to 4M 4,500,000.00 06/30/2020 955-00000-104010 Check Total: 4,500,000.00 Vendor: 1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 6/30/2020 51-9391437-3 - Prairie Center 144.03 06/30/2020 101-41941-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505909-4 - DMV/Food Shelf 163.61 06/30/2020 217-41990-438100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/01/2020 - 11:41 AM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6/30/2020 51-6505915-2 - Parks 528.46 06/30/2020 101-45201-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505912-9 - Animal Shelter 93.85 06/30/2020 101-42700-438100 6/30/2020 51-4271112-2- Library 846.26 06/30/2020 101-45501-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505907-2 - Park Lots- auto 69.99 06/30/2020 101-43160-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505907-2 - Parking Lots 58.44 06/30/2020 101-43160-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505905-0 - Water 5,725.91 06/30/2020 601-49440-438100 6/30/2020 51 -6505915 -2 -Ice Rink 33% 87.37 06/30/2020 601-49440-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505913-0 - Fire Station 1,042.79 06/30/2020 101-42200-438100 6/30/2020 51-7780310-4- Bldg.Inspec. G 43.83 06/30/2020 101-41940-438100 6/30/2020 51-0623082-8 - MontiArts 205.46 06/30/2020 101-45204-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505915-2 - NSP- Softball 219.36 06/30/2020 101-45203-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505910-7- Liquor Store 1,362.63 06/30/2020 609-49754-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505906-1 - Sewer 1,318.10 06/30/2020 602-49490-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505915-2 - NSP- consc/sec. 34.15 06/30/2020 101-45203-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505916-3 - Street Lights 12,043.78 06/30/2020 101-43160-438100 6/30/2020 51-0371645-4 - SwanCam 18.65 06/30/2020 101-45201-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505905-0 - Water Solar Rebate 28,951.31 k' -3,633.40 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 6/30/2020 51-6505906-1 - Sewer Solar Rebate 3697.95 kW -521.98 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 6/30/2020 51-4271112-2 - Library Solar Rebate 5,540.89 k` -695.38 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 6/30/2020 ZZZNEP-IMPLEM 51-6505908-3 16.67 06/30/2020 101-42500-438100 6/30/2020 51-6505909-4 - DMV/Food Shelf Solar Rebate 1 -155.51 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 6/30/2020 51-6505910-7 - Liquor Store Solar Rebate 10,59 -1,313.96 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 6/30/2020 51-6505912-9 - Animal Shelter Solar Rebate 34: -49.90 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 6/30/2020 51-6505913-0 - Fire Station Solar Rebate 2197 k -272.54 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 6/30/2020 51-6505915-2 - Solar Rebate 533.29kWh -298.92 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 6/30/2020 51-7780310-4 - Bldg. Inspec. G Solar Rebate 80 -11.67 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 6/30/2020 51-9391437-3 - Prairie Center Solar Rebate 245. -35.88 06/30/2020 101-41310-362140 Check Total: 17,034.20 Total for Check Run: 4,673,996.63 Total of Number of Checks: 8 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/13/20 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/01/2020 - 11:41 AM) Page 3 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.cheney Printed: 07/08/2020 - 12:45PM Batch: 00203.07.2020 - 203.07.2020 AP Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Moiiii6effo Y Reference Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 50081 Manual Air Relief Body Assembly 191.72 07/14/2020 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 191.72 Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 3424959 resale- beer 482.15 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 482.15 Vendor: 4046 AST SPORTS, INC Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 4240 (1) ladies softshell 51.98 07/14/2020 609-49754-421990 4240 utx - embroidery -(1) ladies softshell 10.00 07/14/2020 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 61.98 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True 101529900 freight 0.91 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 101529900 asst. bags 55.00 07/14/2020 609-49754-421990 101529900 resale - olives 16.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425500 101529900 resale - can holders 128.50 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 101551200 asst. bags 111.95 07/14/2020 609-49754-421990 101551200 resale - mix 147.60 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 101551200 freight 1.19 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 101593500 asst. bags 62.92 07/14/2020 609-49754-421990 101593500 resale - mix 90.60 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 101593500 resale - olives 26.50 07/14/2020 609-49750-425500 101593500 freight 0.82 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 84692800 resale - liquor 2,563.53 07/14/2020 609-49750-425100 84692800 resale - wine 398.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425300 84692800 freight 43.01 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 3,646.53 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 98739 resale- beer 3,393.65 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 3,393.65 Vendor: 1084 C/O CSG BROCK WHITE COMPANY LLC Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 14039733 (4) MT threaded aluminum handle 113.96 07/14/2020 101-43120-421990 Check Total: 113.96 Vendor: 1792 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTIONS INC Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 41708 41.71 Ton Red Ball Diamond 869.65 07/14/2020 101-45203-421990 Check Total: 869.65 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 2433557 resale - beer 22,082.59 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 2433557 resale - beer n/a 291.43 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 22,374.02 Vendor: 1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 19440 resale- wine 135.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 135.00 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True 00086497 Monthly Tank Rental 65.00 07/14/2020 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 65.00 Vendor: 1120 CONCRETE PRODUCTS NEW LONDON Check Sequence: l I ACH Enabled: True 224605 ZPARKS-RWLKTR - (24) asst. Fieldstone boulc 3,682.00 07/14/2020 229-45202-453010 Check Total: 3,682.00 Vendor: 4861 CORE & MAIN LP Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False M524875 (6) 5-1/4 Av. box locking lid 165.87 07/14/2020 601-49440-421990 Check Total: 165.87 Vendor: 2935 CUSTOMIZED FIRE RESCUE TRAINING IN( Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False 1703 FIREDN-CARSRU - Feb. & Mar. 2020 SRU cla 800.00 07/14/2020 101-42200-433100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 3 Check Total: 800.00 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True 112-03554 resale - beer 32,199.50 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 112-03554 resale - beer n/a 27.95 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 112-03582 resale - beer 12,013.60 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 112-03582 resale - beer n/a 67.20 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 1189465 resale - beer credit -159.45 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 1203127 resale - beer credit -24.60 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 1247627 resale - beer 230.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 1249827 resale - beer 690.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 155-00041 resale - beer credit -3.71 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 45,040.49 Vendor: 4394 DAXKO, LLC Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 94355 Annual Spectrum Software Fee 10,099.95 07/14/2020 226-45122-430900 Check Total: 10,099.95 Vendor: 2050 DEMVI LLC Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 6/21/2020 Parking Lot Maintenance Agreement - July 2020 162.13 07/14/2020 213-46301-443990 Check Total: 162.13 Vendor: 4232 DIAMOND MOWERS INC Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 179092 (2) double V belt; sheave idler assmbly 231.95 07/14/2020 101-43120-422100 Check Total: 231.95 Vendor: 5201 DICK FAMILY, INC. Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 1241000056 resale - beer 2,384.30 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 964005225 resale - beer 326.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 964005226 resale - beer credit -11.20 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 2,699.10 Vendor: 1147 DOUBLE D ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 25053 W.Bridge Park Bldg. - remove recepticle by sink 128.00 07/14/2020 101-45201-440100 25054 replace (2) Ni -Cor LED fixtures; eyelets; wire m 499.64 07/14/2020 101-43127-440440 25055 Electrical upgrades to blk. 52 old car manu. shop 907.90 07/14/2020 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 1,535.54 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 781278 2019 Annual TIF Disclosure 35.00 07/14/2020 213-46519-435100 781278 2019 Annual TIF Disclosure 35.00 07/14/2020 213-46522-435100 781278 2019 Annual TIF Disclosure 35.00 07/14/2020 213-46524-435100 781278 2019 Annual TIF Disclosure 35.00 07/14/2020 213-46529-435100 781278 2019 Annual TIF Disclosure 35.00 07/14/2020 213-46530-435100 781278 2019 Annual TIF Disclosure 35.00 07/14/2020 213-46534-435100 781278 2019 Annual TIF Disclosure 35.00 07/14/2020 213-46539-435100 781278 2019 Annual TIF Disclosure 105.74 07/14/2020 213-46301-435100 782289 202018 - Holtz PH Ad# 1052718 110.76 07/14/2020 101-41910-435100 782290 Industrial Height PH Ad# 1052721 110.76 07/14/2020 101-41910-435100 782291 202016 -Haman PH Ad# 1052730 119.99 07/14/2020 101-41910-435100 Check Total: 692.25 Vendor: 4191 ELK RIVER GREENHOUSE LLC Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 7/7/2020 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/25 &' 65.00 07/14/2020 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 65.00 Vendor: 1722 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT & SERVIC] Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 16280 hose -suction HD 600/FHD 638.52 07/14/2020 101-43120-422100 16282 sweeper - instl. belt; adj/align; update software; 1,203.50 07/14/2020 101-43127-440440 16285CR return -wear flange; (2) suction liner; liner rear w -751.00 07/14/2020 101-43120-422100 Check Total: 1,091.02 Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False 455775 (2) 3 hyd. meter usg. w/ nst. coup. 2,643.20 07/14/2020 601-49440-422701 456892 resale - (11) LF T10 meter R900I USG 2,674.10 07/14/2020 601-49440-422710 Check Total: 5,317.30 Vendor: 3432 FLAGSHIP RECREATION LLC Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False F4663 (1) digger ground pipe; oil impreg. bearing; retai 119.28 07/14/2020 101-45203-421990 Check Total: 119.28 Vendor: 3748 JEFFREY D GARDNER Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: True 7/7/2020 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 7/2/20 26.00 07/14/2020 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 26.00 Vendor: 3762 GARRETTS DIAMOND CITY BREAD Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 7/7/2020 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/18, 6/: 141.00 07/14/2020 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 141.00 Vendor: 5364 SARAH GOHMAN Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 7/7/2020 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/25 & ' 53.00 07/14/2020 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 53.00 Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: True 60600 June 2020 (312) tickets - 1/2 Water 210.60 07/14/2020 601-49440-432770 60600 June 2020 (312) tickets - 1/2 Sewer 210.60 07/14/2020 602-49490-432770 Check Total: 421.20 Vendor: 1205 GRAINGER INC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False 9566237104 V Belt 15.35 07/14/2020 101-45501-422990 9573262319 V Belt 30.46 07/14/2020 226-45126-422990 9574582954 Refrigerent 124.50 07/14/2020 226-45126-422990 9576678875 Manifold Gauge 90.47 07/14/2020 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 260.78 Vendor: 4972 GUSTAFSON SIGN MAN INC Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False 2802 White Lettering for Steel Doors 50.00 07/14/2020 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 50.00 Vendor: 5417 HAIRLESS DOG BREWING, LLC. Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 1186 resale- beer n/a 153.85 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 153.85 Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True 4737990 chemicals for city wells 6,156.42 07/14/2020 601-49440-421600 4741130 Aluminum Sulfate Liquid - WWTP 6,440.75 07/14/2020 602-49480-421990 Check Total: 12,597.17 Vendor: 5342 HEADWATER HOMES Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False 6/18/2020 Escrow Refund - 8593 Gateway Cir/Carlisle Vill 2,000.00 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 6/18/2020 Escrow Refund - 8595 Gateway Cir/Carlisle Vill 2,000.00 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 6/18/2020 Escrow Refund - 8597 Gateway Cir/Carlisle Vill 2,000.00 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 6/18/2020 Escrow Refund - 8599 Gateway Cir/Carlisle Vill 2,000.00 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 6/18/2020 Escrow Refund - 8601 Gateway Cir/Carlisle Vill 2,000.00 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False Page 6 Check Total: 10,000.00 Vendor: 1239 HOGLUND BUS COMPANY INC Check Sequence: 34 137536 08 Spartan Metro Star- diagnose & repair coolan 178.20 07/14/2020 101-42200-440500 137705 Tender 11- diagnose & repair air line leak 311.85 07/14/2020 101-42200-440500 Check Total: 490.05 Vendor: 1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 35 06/18/20 acct. #1400-017-223-399 fuel slips 5/19-6/18/20 389.27 07/14/2020 101-42200-421200 Check Total: 389.27 Vendor: 5487 JONATHAN HOPKINS Check Sequence: 36 7/7/2020 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/25 30.00 07/14/2020 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 30.00 Vendor: 4745 ILLINOIS CASUALTY COMPANY Check Sequence: 37 LL103171 2020 Acct. # 173222- Liquor Liability Ins. 7/16/2020- 1,479.00 07/14/2020 609-49754-436100 Check Total: 1,479.00 Vendor: 3971 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGINEERS LOCAL Check Sequence: 38 Aug 2020 Health Insurance - August 2020 16,445.00 07/14/2020 101-00000-217061 Check Total: 16,445.00 Vendor: 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC Check Sequence: 39 4236 burial- 6/18/20 Smith 400.00 07/14/2020 651-49010-431150 Check Total: 400.00 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 40 106039 resale- mix credit inv. # 1580963 -16.70 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 106040 resale- wine credit inv. # 1580963 -20.70 07/14/2020 609-49750-425300 1541793 Original inv. 1489788 1/27/20 serv. fee 41.81 07/14/2020 609-49750-443990 1587203 resale- liquor 8,182.46 07/14/2020 609-49750-425100 1587203 freight 104.45 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 1587204 freight 64.08 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 1587204 resale- wine 1,765.80 07/14/2020 609-49750-425300 1587204 resale- wine n/a 207.10 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 7 Check Total: 10,328.30 Vendor: 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False MN190-00101 General EDA- May 2020 340.00 07/14/2020 213-46301-430400 MN190-00156 TIF District 40 (Briggs Housing) - May 2020 240.00 07/14/2020 213-46301-430400 MN190-00159 Block 52 Redevelopment - May 2020 60.00 07/14/2020 213-46301-430400 Check Total: 640.00 Vendor: 5507 NICK LAVRENZE Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False 6/18/2020 Escrow Refund - 9151 Leaf Circle #18-00376 2,000.00 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 2,000.00 Vendor: 3933 CHARLES LONG Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 7/7/2020 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/25/20 79.00 07/14/2020 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 79.00 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: True 30246 resale - beer 813.45 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 30344 resale - beer 379.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 1,192.45 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: True 303394 resale - cooler 46.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 46.00 Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: True 1765 (1000) letterhead & envelopes; 1.25 hr. creative 453.27 07/14/2020 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 453.27 Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 21827774 (500) gal. unleaded @ $1.655 827.56 07/14/2020 101-43120-421200 21827795 (43 1) gal. diesel @ $1.733 746.94 07/14/2020 101-43120-421200 21839795 (650) gal. unleaded @ $1.738 1,129.98 07/14/2020 101-43120-421200 21839812 (485) gal. diesel @ $1.737 842.66 07/14/2020 101-43120-421200 Check Total: 3,547.14 Vendor: 1726 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 417629870 6/19/20 - 7/19/20 - Contract Payment 249.34 07/14/2020 702-00000-441500 417629870 Supply Freight Fee 10.00 07/14/2020 702-00000-441500 Check Total: 259.34 Vendor: 1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY Check Sequence: 49 626707 contract C0560 - repair bad compressor in left cc 921.94 07/14/2020 609-49754-440440 626792 contract C0560 -replace compressor; replace eva 2,882.21 07/14/2020 609-49754-440440 Check Total: 3,804.15 Vendor: 2996 METRO APPLIANCE RECYCLING Check Sequence: 50 581778D Recycling @ 300 4th St E - Appliances, Tires, N 1,561.55 07/14/2020 213-46301-461500 Check Total: 1,561.55 Vendor: 1341 MMKR Check Sequence: 51 48402 Revised Final Billing - Audit Financial Stmts Yr End 12/: 5,504.00 07/14/2020 101-41540-430100 Check Total: 5,504.00 Vendor: 2512 MONTICELLO PLBG HTG AC LLC Check Sequence: 52 21027 18C003- labor- (12) filter replacements 42.50 07/14/2020 400-43300-452010 21027 18C003- parts- (12) filter replacements 153.50 07/14/2020 400-43300-452010 21082 18C003- IT room ventilaton- Fantech equivalent 4,260.00 07/14/2020 400-43300-452010 Check Total: 4,456.00 Vendor: 1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Check Sequence: 53 1261424-00 pipe -injection 50.06 07/14/2020 101-45201-422990 1263327-00 Tire & Wheel Assembly 174.04 07/14/2020 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 224.10 Vendor: 1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC Check Sequence: 54 6134 2019 Annual TIF Reporting - TIF 1-6 105.00 07/14/2020 213-46506-431990 6134 2019 Annual TIF Reporting - TIF 1-19 105.00 07/14/2020 213-46519-431990 6134 2019 Annual TIF Reporting - TIF 1-20 105.00 07/14/2020 213-46520-431990 6134 2019 Annual TIF Reporting - TIF 1-24 105.00 07/14/2020 213-46524-431990 6134 2019 Annual TIF Reporting - TIF 129 105.00 07/14/2020 213-46529-431990 6134 2019 Annual TIF Reporting - TIF 1-30 105.00 07/14/2020 213-46530-431990 6134 2019 Annual TIF Reporting - TIF 1-34 105.00 07/14/2020 213-46534-431990 6134 2019 Annual TIF Reporting - TIF 1-39 105.00 07/14/2020 213-46539-431990 ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 9 Check Total: 840.00 Vendor: 5426 NOVEL SOLAR TWO LLC Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: True 430200705NS2 Solar Rebate Program - April 2020 35,342.92 07/14/2020 101-41310-443992 Check Total: 35,342.92 Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True 19344 18C003 - (5) hbl5369C connectors; (7) cord 16/= 390.43 07/14/2020 400-43300-452010 19345 18C003 - return (8) plug 20A purchased 2/2020 -131.44 07/14/2020 400-43300-452010 60097 make connections at junction box of pump motor 301.13 07/14/2020 601-49440-440600 Check Total: 560.12 Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False 14476 (3.01) LV5 2350 228.76 07/14/2020 101-43120-422400 14482 (3.01) LV5 2350 228.76 07/14/2020 101-43120-422400 14502 (5) LV5 2350 380.00 07/14/2020 101-43120-422400 14517 (3.01) LV5 2350 228.76 07/14/2020 101-43120-422400 14544 (22.06) LV5 2350 1,676.56 07/14/2020 101-43120-422400 Check Total: 2,742.84 Vendor: 5223 OMG MIDWEST, INC. Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False Pay Voucher 1 200001 - 2020 Street Improvements - Pay Voucl 192,469.07 07/14/2020 400-43300-459021 Check Total: 192,469.07 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 6053350 resale- liquor 903.70 07/14/2020 609-49750-425100 6053350 freight 10.49 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 914.19 Vendor: 5454 PROFESSIONAL CLEANING SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 1049 Window Washing - Library 230.00 07/14/2020 101-45501-431100 1050 Cleaning Service - June - Head End 380.00 07/14/2020 656-00000-202099 1050 Cleaning Service - June - Prairie Center 420.00 07/14/2020 101-41941-431100 1050 Cleaning Service - June - Library 1,560.00 07/14/2020 101-45501-431100 Check Total: 2,590.00 Vendor: 2066 PROGRESSIVE BUILDERS Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False 6/18/2020 Escrow Refund - 8700 Ebersole Ave/Featherston 2,000.00 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 10 Check Total: 2,000.00 Vendor: 5431 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False 7/3/2020 Postage for Title & Registration Pkgs DMV June 128.47 07/14/2020 217-41990-432200 7/3/2020 Postage Fee 39.00 07/14/2020 101-41310-432200 Check Total: 167.47 Vendor: 1450 RAILROAD MANAGEMENT CO III LLC Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False 421264 License Fees - Sewer Pipeline Crossing 10/16/2( 258.95 07/14/2020 602-49490-431990 421270 License Fees - 10/17/20 - 10/16/21 License #306 258.95 07/14/2020 263-49200-431990 Check Total: 517.90 Vendor: 1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 6/22/20 Shop #116 recharge A/C 130.00 07/14/2020 101-43120-440500 6/22/20 Shop credit balance use -0.60 07/14/2020 101-43120-440500 Check Total: 129.40 Vendor: 2074 RIVERWOOD BANK Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False 7/7/2020 Facade Improvement Project Grant - Agosto 50,000.00 07/14/2020 213-00000-103010 Check Total: 50,000.00 Vendor: 5400 ROTO -ROOTER PLUMBING & DRAIN Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False 9439379 Basic Sewer Cleaning to Remove Clog @ 25'- F 386.00 07/14/2020 101-41941-440100 Check Total: 386.00 Vendor: 5502 ALEX ROWLAND Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: True 7/7/2020 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 7/2/20 28.00 07/14/2020 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 28.00 Vendor: 1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: True A37279 (25) Prox key fobs-nxt 187.50 07/14/2020 101-42200-421990 A37448 Adjust, Clean, Lubricate Rods, Test - South Entr 120.00 07/14/2020 226-45126-440100 A37492 Install New Top Latch, Labor, Adjustments - AE 130.00 07/14/2020 226-45126-440100 A37549 Install Lever on Electric Room: Labor, Conversi 457.00 07/14/2020 226-45126-440100 Check Total: 894.50 Vendor: 4981 STEVE SCHILLEWAERT Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 62034 June Blight Mowings (2) 200.00 07/14/2020 101-42400-431050 662028 Riverside Cemetery- June 2020 (2) mow; litter 1 2,000.00 07/14/2020 651-49010-431050 662029 June 2020 (3) mow; (2) sprayed; litter pick up 975.00 07/14/2020 101-45201-431050 Check Total: 3,175.00 Vendor: 4194 JENNIFER SCHREIBER Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: True 7/7/2020 Mileage Reimbursement - June/July (111.6 mile; 64.17 07/14/2020 101-41410-433100 Check Total: 64.17 Vendor: 3751 CHRISTINE SCHYMA Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False 7/7/2020 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/25 &' 99.00 07/14/2020 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 99.00 Vendor: 4148 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. #3442 Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False 6382-1 Paint - Prairie Center 238.34 07/14/2020 101-41941-422990 Check Total: 238.34 Vendor: 5211 RANDI ANN SMELSER Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False July 1st Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,575.00 07/14/2020 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,575.00 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False 1968146 resale- liquor 3,211.47 07/14/2020 609-49750-425100 1968146 freight 35.47 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 1968147 freight 1.40 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 1968147 resale- mix 40.12 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 5058837 resale- wine 896.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425300 5058837 freight 15.40 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 4,199.86 Vendor: 4672 SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: False 150010 (2) 501b. Home Lawn Mix w/ Go n Grow; (12) , 1,244.30 07/14/2020 101-45201-421600 150011 (554) 501b. 17-9-7 Lawn Starter 1,139.46 07/14/2020 101-45201-421600 150014 (66) 501b. 8-12-6 Soil Prep Plus 1,538.40 07/14/2020 101-45201-421600 Check Total: 3,922.16 Vendor: 4513 AARON STAEHNKE Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: True 7/7/2020 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/25 & ' 59.00 07/14/2020 226-45127-431992 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 12 Check Total: 59.00 Vendor: 1512 SYLVA CORPORATION INC LB 7958 Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False 63524 (110) CY Softstep Playground surfacing 1,804.50 07/14/2020 101-45201-422500 Check Total: 1,804.50 Vendor: 5422 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LI Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 148873 Pest Control - Ants 35.00 07/14/2020 217-41990-431990 Check Total: 35.00 Vendor: 4859 TRIO SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False 617172 Covid- (6) can liner; (6) latex gloves; (4) paper ti 895.96 07/14/2020 101-42500-421990 617172 (2) hot bev. cups; (2) 12oz. cups; 8oz. styro. cup: 279.43 07/14/2020 101-45201-421990 Check Total: 1,175.39 Vendor: 4656 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC. Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False 673108 resale - barware 68.94 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 677582 resale - barware; bottle holders; bottle stoppers; E 328.54 07/14/2020 609-49750-425400 677582 resale - condiments 159.12 07/14/2020 609-49750-425500 Check Total: 556.60 Vendor: 1188 TWAIT WINES, INC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 3688 resale- wine 252.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 252.00 Vendor: 5505 TWIN STAR EQUIPMENT & MFG. CO. Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False 2401 install utility box - Parks new truckF250 vin #39 12,306.77 07/14/2020 703-00000-165010 Check Total: 12,306.77 Vendor: 1537 UHL COMPANY INC Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: True 24238 Replaced Compressor for Magic Pak Unit @ Foc 1,905.00 07/14/2020 217-41990-440100 61002 Replace Solenoid Valve, Recharge Circuit, Repai 1,875.00 07/14/2020 226-45126-440100 Check Total: 3,780.00 Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False 7/7/2020 PI 42 - UB July Billing (3691 pcs) (1/2) 848.93 07/14/2020 601-49440-432200 7/7/2020 PI 42 - UB July Billing (3691 pcs) (1/2) 848.93 07/14/2020 602-49490-432200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 13 Check Total: 1,697.86 Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L. Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: True 90244374 August 2020 - WWTP Operations & Maintenanc 62,250.00 07/14/2020 602-49480-430800 Check Total: 62,250.00 Vendor: 1555 VONCO II LLC Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 56304 Waste Removal @ 4th Street House 135.00 07/14/2020 213-46301-461500 Check Total: 135.00 Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False 8058 June 2020 water testing 272.00 07/14/2020 601-49440-431990 Check Total: 272.00 Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False 9543 labor - rewire receptacle at Ellison Park Shelter 682.50 07/14/2020 101-45201-431990 9543 parts- rewire receptacle at Ellison Park Shelter 624.09 07/14/2020 101-45201-431990 9558 Labor - Install Receptacle for Heater, Check Lig] 240.00 07/14/2020 101-41940-440100 9558 Parts - Wire, Connectors, Conduit Box, Wire Tie 37.51 07/14/2020 101-41940-440100 Check Total: 1,584.10 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False 7289258 resale- wine 600.00 07/14/2020 609-49750-425300 7289258 freight 7.45 07/14/2020 609-49750-433300 733166 resale- wine credit inv. #7286205 -36.50 07/14/2020 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 570.95 Vendor: 5027 ERICA WITZMANN Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False 6/22/2020 dba-W Photography & Design - columbarium ph 100.00 07/14/2020 651-49010-431990 Check Total: 100.00 Vendor: 2645 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False TIF 1-22 TIF 1-22 Excess Tax Increment Returned to Con 137,813.00 07/14/2020 213-46522-443989 Check Total: 137,813.00 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: True July July 2020 - Deputies Contract 124,104.50 07/14/2020 101-42100-430500 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) 654.50 2,599.25 304.00 3,799.00 2,524.00 2,312.50 274.00 298.75 16,677.50 30,428.00 861,912.77 Check Sequence: 93 07/14/2020 101-42400-322110 Check Sequence: 94 07/14/2020 400-43300-430300 07/14/2020 229-45202-453011 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 07/14/2020 400-43300-459021 07/14/2020 213-46301-431990 07/14/2020 101-43111-430300 07/14/2020 702-00000-431990 07/14/2020 229-45202-453012 07/14/2020 213-46301-431990 ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/13/20 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf Page 14 Check Total: Vendor: 5293 WS & D PERMIT SERVICES 6/26/2020 Refund - Buliding Permit #2020-00513 Check Total: Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 002596-400 40 16C006 - Fallon Ave Improvements - May 2020 R011744-00 25 16C001 BCOL Phase 1 -May 2020 R012792-000 12 19D004 - Headwaters Senior Living Plan RevieN R014321-000 9 201924 - Buchholtz Concept PUD/Monticello A] R014709-000 10 200001 - 2020 Street Improvements - May 2020 R015355-000 5 2020 Economic Development Services - May 2( R015379-000 4 2020 Maps - May 2020 R015380-000 2 2020 GIS Support Services - May 2020 R016082-000 2 200003 - Briarwood Ave Expansion - May 2020 R016234-000 1 Industrial Park Feasibility Study - May 2020 Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/08/2020 - 12:45 PM) 654.50 2,599.25 304.00 3,799.00 2,524.00 2,312.50 274.00 298.75 16,677.50 30,428.00 861,912.77 Check Sequence: 93 07/14/2020 101-42400-322110 Check Sequence: 94 07/14/2020 400-43300-430300 07/14/2020 229-45202-453011 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 07/14/2020 101-00000-220110 07/14/2020 400-43300-459021 07/14/2020 213-46301-431990 07/14/2020 101-43111-430300 07/14/2020 702-00000-431990 07/14/2020 229-45202-453012 07/14/2020 213-46301-431990 ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/13/20 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf Page 14 City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Jack Jones Clerk Amanda Erickson Asst. DMV Manager Jami Johnson Clerk Tim Genung Parks Worker Eric Fischer Water/Sewer Operator Mike Haaland* Street Superintendent Name Oliver Andrews Voluntary * Promotion Department Hire Date Class Liquor Store 6/30/2020 PT DMV 7/6/2020 Temp FT Liquor Store 7/8/2020 PT Parks 7/13/2020 Seasonal Water 7/13/2020 FT Streets 7/18/2020 FT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Reason New Hire and Terms City Council 2020: 7/7/2020 Department Last Day Class MCC 2/22/2020 PT City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 2C. Consideration of approving the sale of Monticello Fire Station surplus property and miscellaneous item from the Parks Department (SR) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to declare certain items as surplus property and authorize the sale or disposal of those items. The Fire Department is disposing of a XTL 5000 Radio from the old fire truck. The Parks Department is selling/disposing of miscellaneous items with nominal value. Al. Budget Impact: Varies by the value of the property. A2. Staff Work Load Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the sale of the items. 2. Motion to deny the sale or disposal of surplus property as recommended. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends Option 1 to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Surplus List -Fire B. Photo C. Surplus List - Park 1 Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department: Fire 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A. B. C. 7. $100 - $1,000 A. XTL 5000 radio with remote head B. C. Date: 7/13/2020 0 Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department: Parks 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A. 1979 Tree spade B. C. 7. $100 - $1,000 A. Toro HC4000 Aerator B. Trac Vac C. Meyers sprayer 8. $0-$100 A. Wood shelving B. Flat Files C. Misc playground equipment D. Blower arm E. Rubber Mats F. Vac hose G. Misc wood Date: 7-9-2020 H. Blower attachment I. Fiberglass signs J. Old Ballet box K. Two pallets of recycle bins L. Cage City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 21). Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-50 accepting donation of $11,000 from the Ellison Family for the Fire Department rehab trailer and a donation of $715.19 from Donna Dunkerson for plants at East Bridge Park JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is being asked to approve a donation of $11,000 from the Ellison Family for the Fire Department rehab trailer and a donation from Donna Dunkerson in the amount of $715.19 for purchase of plants for East Bridge Park. Al. Budget Impact: The donations will pay for expenses of the program. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff will do the work to put on this event. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopting Resolution 2020-50 accepting the contributions and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to deny the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2020-50 CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DES ON I VALUE Ellison Family sh $11,000 Donna Dunkerson AWlants $715.19 WHEREAS, all said contributions are ded to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdict ther alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council here finds that propriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the followine, stated Durpose: I DONOR/ENTITY 1_ _ PURPOSE/AMOUNT Ellisof Family I I moire Department Rehab Trailer/$11,000 Donna Dunkerson Plants for East Bridge Park/$715.19 Adopted by the City Council Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk s 13th day of July, 2020. Brian Stumpf, Mayor City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 2E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-51 accepting a grant from Central Minnesota Arts Board of $3,500 for the Artist in Residency Program (TP) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider a grant contribution from the Central Minnesota Arts Board for the Artist in Residency Grant. Victoria Eidelstein, the artist, will be doing portraits and working the Humans team. Al. Budget Impact: CMAB grant funds will offset the cost of the project. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The Arts Consultant will work with the selected artist to create a public exhibit upon project completion. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2020-51 accepting a grant from Central Minnesota Arts Board for the sum of $3,500 for the Artist in Residency program. 2. Motion to deny Grant. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2020-51 -CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2020 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM CENTRAL MINNESOTA ARTS BOARD IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,500 WHEREAS, The City of Monticello applied for a grant from the Central Minnesota Arts Board for the Artist in Residency Grant; and WHEREAS, The City of Monticello was notified by the Clral Minnesota Arts Board that the city received a grant award for the above project in the amount of $3,500. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBYRESOLVED Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFMONTICELLO: That the City Council authori cepting a grant of $3,500 from Central Minnesota Arts Board. Adopted by the Monticello City Council this 13th day of July, 2026. Its Brian Stumpf, Mayor City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 2F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-52 appointing election iudges to serve for the 2020 primary and general elections, including iudges for the Absentee Ballot Board (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Minnesota Statutes Chapter 20413.21 requires cities to appoint election judges to serve at primary and general elections. A Head Election judge should also be designated as part of the appointment. The appointment of these judges is contingent upon them completing the necessary training, which is required every two years with training sessions taking place in July. We are pleased to report that we have about 30 people that indicated an interest in being an election judge and have completed an application. This list includes people that signed up at caucuses and were provided to us from the County. We request that Council approve all of the names on the list to serve as election judges and Head Judges for 2020. We anticipate needing additional judges for the General election and are recruiting other candidates to serve as election judges, which will be presented for approval at a later date. Several members of city staff will again be assisting with the absentee voting process and are also trained as election judges. With the change in the absentee voting process and the current health pandemic, we anticipate a greater number of voters that opt to vote absentee. Al. Budget Impact: Election judge compensation is included in the 2020 budget. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The City Clerk and Administrative Assistant will be involved with elections to a greater degree than other staff. As it gets closer to the Primary and General Election days, it is anticipated that more time will be spent on elections, including some overtime. It should be noted that State Election Laws mandate certain hours for absentee and regular voting, some of which fall outside of regular city work hours. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2020-52 appointing the 2020 election judges as recommended. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2020-52 and Judge List CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2020-52 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ELECTION JUDGES AND APPOINTING ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 11, 2020 PRIMARY ELECTION AND NOVEMBER 3, 2020 GENERAL ELECTION, INCLUDING JUDGES FOR THE ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello is required by MS 20413.2 1, Sec. 2, to officially approve the appointment of election judges and absentee ballot board members; and 1W WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council' herby adopts the judges listed on the attached Exhibit A, hereto attached, as the official judges for the August 11, 2020 Primary Election and November 3, 2020 General Election with the understanding t t amendments may be necessary to the appointments in order to fill vacancies and meet party rapirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the ity Council of Monticello that the names listed on Exhibit A, hereto attached, are the official tion Judges and that the names on Exhibit A that are highlighted are the official Absentee Ballo d members for the City of Monticello for the 2020 Primary and General Elections. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH10YOF VTICELLO ON THIS 1311' DAY OF JULY, 2020. CITY OF MONTICELLO Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Brian Stumpf, Mayor ELECTION JUDGES - 2020 Election Cycle (Primary/General) as of July 9, 2020 (Absentee Board hiqhliqhted) name address Role Cindy Anderson Monticello Judge Fred Anderson Monticello Judge Marge Arndt Monticello Judge Duane Carlson Monticello Judge Winfred Causby Monticello Judge Julie Cheney Staff/Jud e Deb Cole Staff/Judge Agnes DeMarais Monticello Judge Janet Doucette Monticello Judge Roseann Duran Monticello Head Judge Tracy Er en Monticello Judge Keri Erickson Monticello Judge Rebecca Francisco Monticello Judge Dorothy Frid en Monticello Judge Mark Gilberts Monticello Judge Matt Griswold Monticello Judge Beth Green Staff/Judge Renee Hitter Monticello Lead Judge Bill Hoffarth Monticello Judge Lois Holtberg Monticello Judge Steve Larson Monticello Judge Vicki Leerhoff Staff/Head Judge Rachel Leonard Staff/Head Judge Elizabeth Linrud Staff/Judge Monica Martin Monticello Judge Jo Moyer Judge July Moody Monticello Judge Frank Opay Monticello Judge Joan Opay Monticello Judge Sarah Rathlisber er Staff/Judge Mary Rausch Monticello Judge Michael Schmidt Monticello Judge Jennifer Schreiber Election Admin/Judge Darlene Solberg Monticello Judge Patricia Son'u Thielman Monticello Judge Jacob Thunander Staff/Head Judge Sandy Thurber Monticello Judge Sarah Wiler Monticello Judge Teri Willenbring Monticello Judge City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 2G. Consideration to approve a Therapeutic Massage Enterprise license for Massage by Rebecca at 113 W. Broadway St. (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider a Therapeutic Massage Enterprise Licenses for Massage by Rebecca, 113 West Broadway St. Massage by Rebecca will be renting a space. The license, if approved, will be in effect immediately. The applicant for the business license will also be the sole massage therapist for the establishment. The following items are required for licensing: application completed by the applicant; license fee of $100; completed Background Information and Release Form and fee of $25; a completed Data Practices Advisory Form (Tennessen Warning) and a Certificate of Workers Compensation Insurance and/or Liability Insurance. In addition, an inspection is required by our Building Department. If the City Council denies a license they will need to provide findings of fact on the denial. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time was necessary to review the request and prepare this report. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Therapeutic Massage Enterprise License for Massage by Rebecca, 113 W. Broadway St. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Application APPLICATION FOR 2019-2020 THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE ENTERPRISE LICENSE Date: Application is hereby submitted for a Therapeutic Massage Establishment License within the City of Monticello, in accordance with the Ordinance of said City regulating the same. Enclose with the application: • The license fee of $100 + $50 per Massage Therapist (a separate application must be submitted for each therapist) • A completed and signed "background check authorization" form and copy of driver's license • A certificate of workers' comp. insurance or company name & policy # (if applicable) • A certificate of liability insurance ,--� 1. FULL Name of Business: ' c, 2. Check: Individual Corporation Part 3. Address of the Business to be Licensed: i rnft\.k co rn k) S (0 2- Other 4. Business Phone Number(s): (Qi of (0 t `[ _c/, `t 5. Minnesota Tax Identification No.: �-S!j.5L2/ 6. Federal Tax Identification No. 7. Manager or Owner's FULL Name: Tate+ `�irst MI 8. Manager or Owner's Date of Birth: 9. Manager of Owner's Place of Birth: ff apj2licant is different from Manager/Proprietor, -please-fill out Q's 10 through 15 10. Applicant's Full Name: ► " 1W 174-1 v t I First `JMI yant's Phone Number: Cell Home . _ Applicant's Email Address: 13. Applicant's Home Address: 14. Applicant's Date of Birth: 15. Applicant's Place of Birth: 16. Is Applicant, or has Applicant been known by a name other than the current true legal name, and if so, what name(s),when, and in what capacity or place was such a name used. ow L 17. Are you a U.S. Citizen or resident alien or has the legal authority to work in the United States? ck U 45 &k. 18. The name and street address of the business if it is to be conducted under a designation, name, or style other than the name of the applicant, and a certified copy of certificate as required by Minnesota Statues, Section 333.02. 19. Applicant's Position with Company: CSW NLL r" as 'S 20. List the type, name, and location of every business or occupation Applicant has been engaged in during the preceding five years. 21. Does Applicant have any training or experience in performing massage services, including any certification, degrees, diplomas, or educational coursework. 22. Full Name of Owner of Premises: 23. Address of Owner of Premises: (If different from applicant): 24. Owners Phone Number (If different from applicant): 25. Amount of Investment (buildings, fixtures, furniture, etc): 33. The names, residences and/or business addresses of three (3) persons, residents of the State of Minnesota of good moral character, not related to the Applicant or financially interested in the licensee's premises who may be referred as to the Applicant's character, or in the case where information is required of a manager, the managers character. 355 F4 34. Do you reside in Monticello and have your home as a base for your business: _ ^ 1 Yes No �-% _ Uo MD�� �L � � 1 hereby certify that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that the giving of false information or the failure to give pertinent information constitutes cause for revocation of this permit. Further, I agree to comply_W_Lth all the provjsii Qns of the ordinance under which this license is granted. Applicant's Signature: Date: Return completed application and requested information along with the, fee to: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk, City of Monticello, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: 763-271-3204 Approved by/Date Make check or money order payable to "City of Monticello" OFFICE USE ONLY This license will expire on June 30, 2020 WW wwwwwwJESSICA ROSE MARTIN EAU-TELLEGEN NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA .,�•� My Comm. Exp. Jan. 31, 2021 26. If pkv mership, state names and addresses of all partners. Include a copy of the Partnership Agreement. 27. If corporation, state names, addresses and birthdates of all officers and directors. Include a copy of the Articles of Incorporation and Secretary of State's Certificate of Good Standing. Ordinance doesn't require this? No other persons than those named in this application have any interest in the management and control of such business. 28. Description of services to be provided and of goods, if any, to be sold: 29. Business Hours of Operation: P S 30. Other communities where licenses are or have been he d: 31. Has Applicant previously been denied a license to perform massage services, or had a license revoked or suspended, and, if so, the circumstances of such denial, revocation, or suspension. ,Kc) 32. List below as to whether, within the preceding five (5) years, the applicant, and/or owner of the business has been convicted of any crime relating to theft, damage or trespass to property, sale of a controlled substance, or the operation of business; the nature of any such offense and the penalty assessed. NOS- _ City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 2H. Consideration of authorizing a Laserfiche upgrade to the Avante System at a cost of $47,399.69 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is being asked to authorize an upgrade of the current Laserfiche software to the Avante System at a cost of $47,399.69. This needed upgrade was included in the CIP but not the budget for 2020; however, staff believes the upgrade would increase productivity by enhancing remote work capabilities and improving the city's ability to maintain core functions during emergencies. These capabilities are in addition to other base system enhancement to optimize efficiency in the city's archive and data management systems. Laserfiche is a content management software that allows organizations to create, organize, store, and protect digital documents. The software is available in different systems that offer a variety of functionality options to meet the needs of various organizations. The City of Monticello originally purchased the Laserfiche software in 2005 at a cost of approximately $12,500. This base module provided the City with the United/Team systems which are legacy options and no longer offered. Over the years, some updates have been implemented to slightly improve functionality of the system, but a more robust upgrade is needed. The system is outdated and does not provide the needed functionality, especially during this time of remote/mobile work. As our primary retention source for city records, a significant number of city documents have been scanned and stored in Laserfiche. Although the software is designed to make it easier and more efficient to retrieve historical records, the outdated current system is not easily searchable. The upgrade to the Avante system will allow staff to better utilize the information already stored within Laserfiche as well as reduce the need for scanning since documents will be created in Laserfiche. Laserfiche can also be programmed to integrate with other city systems such as Springbrook, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and PermitWorks. In addition, while the current United system is used for scanning and archiving documents, the ability to use the software for other functions is limited. By upgrading to the Avante system, the city will be able to implement new features to improve staff efficiency. The new functionalities include the ability to workflow tasks, route documents, and implement process automation to everything we do. Specifically, the new system includes: • Mobile App allowing organizations to access the features of the Laserfiche Client via a smartphone or tablet. The app features the ability to: • Remotely capture documents, images, and other content • Search for documents throughout the repository • Start and participate in multi-user business processes • Workflow feature that provides powerful and flexible automation tools that manage the repository, synchronize data with other applications and provide lower level process automation routines that can be called by other applications. City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 • Improve agenda creation and distribution • Improve collaboration among departments as staff can see document status in real-time Forms Essentials feature that provides core features necessary to design processes and forms. • Forms Professional has been added to the current quotes. The option adds features to Forms Essentials such as Data Lookups, Process Reporting, Payment Gateway • Provide electronic forms for all city applications • Provide electronic building permit applications that are fully searchable and integrate various department documents related to a parcel (zoning, permits, assessments, etc.) in one spot for easy access • Improved web portal access for staff and residents for city documents. • Improved Accounts Payable process by allowing for the ability to scan invoices for routing, approval, and payment. • Ability to interface between city's GIS system and Laserfiche. • Ability to allow tracking/auditing/reporting documents received by the city. • Ability to significantly reduce city's reliance on paper. As part of the upgrade, we have included 100 service hours to be provided by our vendor, OPG -3. These hours are a crucial component of the upgrade. The service hours will be used to build programs specific to the City of Monticello and train staff. The software vendor does not offer service, support and training for the outdated module. Al. Budget Impact: The upgrade will be funded through the Cares Act as it meets the qualifying criteria. The upgrade will allow for more efficient and productive mobile work. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff would be involved in training and implementing Laserfiche programs for records management. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the Laserfiche upgrade to the Avante system at a cost of $47,399.69. 2. Deny the upgrade. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. This technology is critical for the city's data retention and retrieval. Staff utilizes Laserfiche on a daily basis to access records and archive information. Unfortunately, the current system makes its use cumbersome and time-consuming. The upgrade will greatly improve connectivity between software systems, making it quicker and easier to store and access documents and information. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. OPG -3 Quote B. Avante Information City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 OPG -3, Inc. 8030 Old Cedar Ave S #205 Bloomington, MN 55425-1215 651.233.5075 Quote ADDRESS ATTN. Jennifer Schreiber City of Monticello 505 Walnut Avenue Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 SALES REP Ivan Franklin ITEM MSE30 Avante LF Server for MS SQL with Workflow MNF16 LF Avante Full Named User with WebAccess, Mobile, Snapshot and Email MATX16 Avante LF Advanced Audit Trail - user match MCNC16 Laserfiche Connector - user match MFRM16 Laserfiche Forms - user match MCS01 Laserfiche ScanConnect MCQ01 Laserfiche Quick Fields MCQC4 Laserfiche Barcode and Validation Package MCQC5 Laserfiche Real Time Look Up and Validation Package MPP1 Laserfiche Starter Public Portal MPFRM Laserfiche Forms Portal Add-on MCA01 Laserfiche Import Agent MSE30B LF Avante Server for MS SQL LSAP, billed annually MNF16B LF Avante Full Named User with WebAccess, Mobile, Snapshot and Email LSAP, billed annually MATX166 Avante LF Advanced Audit Trail LSAP, billed annually MCNCI6B OPC-3 QUOTE # 3983-2 DATE 06/30/2020 EXPIRATION DATE 07/30/2020 QTY RATE AMOUNT 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 20 600.00 12,000.00 20 100.00 2,000.00 20 25.00 500.00 20 50.00 1,000.00 1 165.00 165.00 1 595.00 595.00 1 1,695.00 1,695.00 1 595.00 595.00 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 1 7,995.00 7,995.00 1 1,495.00 1,495.00 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 20 120.00 2,400.00 20 20.00 400.00 20 5.00 100.00 ITEM QTY RATE AMOUNT Laserfiche Connector LSAP, billed annually MFRMI 6B 20 10.00 200.00 Laserfiche Forms Basic LSAP, billed annually MOS01 B 1 33.00 33.00 LF ScanConnect LSAP, billed annually MC001 B 1 120.00 120.00 LF Quick Fields LSAP, billed annually MCQC4B 1 340.00 340.00 LF Barcode and Validation Pkg LSAP, billed annually MCQCSB 1 120.00 120.00 LF Real Tlme Look Up and Validation Pkg LSAP, billed annually MPP1 B 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 LF Starter Public Portal LSAP, billed annually MPFRMB 1 1,600.00 1,600.00 LF Forms Portal Add -On LSAP, billed annually MCA01 B 1 390.00 390.00 LF Import Agent LSAP, billed annually Labor 1 185.00 185.00 LF Install Labor (taxable if applicable) LabSoftw 1 740.00 740.00 Installation of core Laserfiche software, web components, audit web components, workflow components. Testing of all core components, create user, create and test workflow engine, create document and test search database, and run Audit. Checklist of Install and testing of components will be provided after install. Credit Software 1 -25,911.67 -25,911.67 Trade-in Upgrade Software Credit LSAP Credit 1 -3,856.64 -3,856.64 Trade -In Upgrade LSAP credit - fluctuating number UNUSED LSAPS " ProProjScope 100 185.00 18,500.00 LF Professional Services: Future Projects Professional Services Hours, (block of time) will be assigned to projects during kick-off meeting. Project scopes will be delivered for review and signoff before projects are initiated. ........................................................................................................................................................... "' LSAP UPGRADE CREDIT: When purchased we will prorate your TOTAL $47,399.69 current unused LSAPS and credit you for the remainder. (As of today the credit would be $3,856.64 however this changes daily with time.)"" "PLEASE NOTE: Quotes are valid for 30 days" PAYMENT TERMS: Upon purchase 50% down deposit is needed to order the new Laserfiche software/system and balance is due within 30 days from original invoice date. Thanks! We appreciate your business. OPG -3 Inc. Accepted By Accepted Date 00004 0000 -he Avante M Drive your organization forward with: Document imaging • Content management • Business process management V MW MW 1% 4100 4004004040 04000040 000000 000000 • • • • 40400000 40400000 404040000 4040040040 11 000000 0000040 AdIlk Adlbk Adll& 0000.00 0000.00 000000 000000 00.40400 0000040 4000000 000000 •00000.00000 000000 000000 4000000 0000400 00.4000 999909 0.0.00 0.0.00 000000 000000 40.40000 000000 4000000 000000 0400000 00*4000 0000040 0400000 0000400 000000 •00000 •00000 000000 000000 4000000 000000 40000400 0.410•• Run Smarter' Laser is e° ASimple, Elegant Approach to Information Management Twenty years ago, the agile approach to information management hinged on document imaging—the ability to convert paper documents into digital images, saving storage space and retrieval time. Ten years ago, agile organizations made the leap to document management— technology that manages imaged and electronic documents throughout their Life cycles, including capture, filing, access control (security) and archiving. Today, successful organizations need more than document management. They need to optimize the decision-making process by getting the right content—whether structured or unstructured, paper or electronic, audio or video, photograph or e-mail—into the right hands at the right time. 1101-4 U �... _ -I' %.W - jrr Mr+ .0 F� or 41 LP I4� mow... La s e rf i c h e Ava m e is a cutting-edge solution that combines comprehensive content management functionality with business process management (BPM) tools to both manage and process information—turning it into an asset that enables efficiency and smart decision making organization -wide. SPEED DOCUMENT IMAGING LIMIT 15 Converts paper documents into an electronic or digital format. SPEED DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT LIMIT Manages documents (physical or digital) throughout 25 their life cycles. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT SPEED LIMIT Applies workflow technology to content -related 45 processes in order to standardize and optimize them. LASERFICHE AVANTE SPEED LIMIT Manages all organizational content throughout its 65 life cycle, including acquisition, filing, access control, routing (using BPM) and archiving. Pull the information you need from: / Paper and electronic documents / Faxes / Paper and electronic forms / E-mails / Third -party databases and applications Underpin your information governance strategy with comprehensive security features such as: / DoD 5015.2- and VERS -certified records management / Digital signatures / Role -based authorization / Access control / Security watermarks and audit trails Put your information to work with: / Microsoft Office° Integration / Microsoft SharePoint° Integration / Apps for use with iOS and Android TM smartphones and tablets Instantly search and retrieve information in your office, on your mobile device or over the Internet using: / Indexing / Property/metadata search / Full text search / Advanced search / Quick Search toolbar Automate resource -intensive processes by configuring workflows that perform specified actions at appropriate times: / Route a document to a specific user / Populate a field / Send an e-mail / Instruct users on next steps in the process / Exchange information with other business -critical applications Functionality, Meet Flexibility Every organization has its own unique needs. Some are looking for a secure content repository, some need to access information through primary business applications such as GIS or CRM, and some want to enable repeatable processes such as case management, contract management, AP processing and more. Laserfiche Avante is an agile ECM system that can be quickly and easily configured to meet any organization's needs. In addition to industry-leading content management to help you store, retrieve and secure your information, Laserfiche Avante includes sophisticated workflow tools to automate content -centric business processes while enabling increased visibility into performance. Laserfiche Avante empowers your organization to operate more efficiently, effectively and profitably by: ► Managing all organizational content—both structured and unstructured—throughout its life cycle. / Ensuring that information is an asset that is consistent, reliable, useful and available. / Facilitating compliance with failsafe security and auditing features. / Integrating seamlessly with the applications employees use every day. ► Streamlining operations by automating manual, repetitive processes. Workflow = Efficiency With powerful business process management tools, Laserfiche Avante integrates both structured and unstructured content into the flow of your business processes, so you enhance productivity, improve efficiency and minimize overhead. Laserfiche Avante's workflow engine also gives you a platform to map, model and manage your business processes. With reporting features built right in, you can quickly uncover and eliminate bottlenecks within your business processes. / Increase productivity by automating manual, repetitive processes. / Improve visibility into your business processes with easy -to -understand reporting. / Model, execute and manage business processes without writing code. / Kick off business processes directly from the Laserfiche Client, Laserfiche Web Access or Laserfiche Mobile. / Trigger workflows based on actions taken in third -party applications like CRM, GIS, ERP and more. 77�" Easy to Design, Configure and Extend More than just simple workflow automation, Laserfiche Workflow builds on the capabilities of Microsoft .NET to seamlessly integrate with your existing systems, business rules and data. J bas5•k� aFiba tis xro�v�� `e.� trr.RFtr+.o • a{wa4it� . snwruya.`xr � Via`. rrrr 1- 40.A O7r4V4F weer aw t,4MFk 'x.r T.+Mr.yM. � W IrY{Cao• �.54W +rt�M1�Y Vi O .dX �..p04 r L.�r�Y�i•.I� I �rh.�r4hY�rvY� Mt M.s.a i1.3ir Yf111Y kWUQO&K 1 hF pgow 4 �[Yil 7kn0 Built-in activities help you build workflows quickly, while extensible rules and a built-in script editor support custom C# and VB.NET scripting. A graphical Workflow Designer enables you to create workflows by flowcharting your business processes with an intuitive interface for testing, modifying and supporting workflow activities. Laserfiche Workflow builds on the capabilities of Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) so you can extend its functionality to all your line -of -business applications. Government Laserfiche Avante moves government agencies beyond finding and filing. With its powerful workflow engine and ability to integrate with a wide variety of enterprise applications, Laserfiche Avante executes repeatable processes in a consistent manner across the organization, optimizing resource efficiency, cost and service delivery. / Accelerate finance processes, shortening collection times and reducing banking fees. / Eliminate bottlenecks when reviewing, approving and issuing permits, improving customer service. / Simplify contract creation using a master template and clause library. Laserfiche Avante allows us to automate processes and more easily access records. Its capabilities help Thousand Oaks maintain high standards of quality and customer service with fewer employees. ' � Antoinette Mann Deputy City Clerk City of Thousand Oaks, CA If a firm has a process that involves multiple touches, multiple points of entry and time sensitivity, then Laserfiche Avante's workflow capability is a viable solution to streamline the process and gain better control. Using Laserfiche, we've saved more than 72 hours of labor annually just by automating a single business process. Joseph Salpietro President and CEO Xpyria Investment Advisors A1* M-] Financial Services Laserfiche Avante improves productivity at financial services firms, enabling employees to spend less time shuffling paper and more time on the profitable, client -facing activities that deliver results. / Quickly bring new clients onboard by automating the new account opening process. / Automate security and correspondence logs. / Route client documents through the approval process with e-mail notifications to ensure timely action. Higher Education Students have higher expectations of their educational investments than ever before. Top institutions have turned to Laserfiche Avante to cut administrative costs, improve information security and facilitate collaboration by making information more accessible. ► Centrally manage information assets to easily meet recordkeeping requirements, instantly fulfill data and information queries and protect confidential student and faculty files with role -based security. ► Enhance business office efficiency by automating key business processes including AP processing, HR onboarding and contract management. ► Ease information -heavy processes such as financial aid applications or student application forms by automatically routing information to specific reviewers. Previously, sending out a big batch of award letters required the letters to be printed, copied, mailed and filed. When I understood that Laserfiche could send those letters to the students' electronic files with the click of a button, that was a big 'aha' moment for me. Clint LaRue Director of Student Financial Services Oklahoma Christian University As the nation's third largest door manufacturer, Steves and Sons produces 3.5 million doors annually. We needed a way to ensure that, from manufacturing to delivery, everything was documented thoroughly. We leveraged the Laserfiche SDK to ensure top quality manufactured products and protection from invalid damage claims. Mobile integration with our Laserfiche Avante system is quite literally changing the way we do business. Tracy Rickman Application Developer Steves and Sons Commercial As businesses grow and change, so does the amount of information they need to process and manage. Successful businesses count on Laserfiche Avante to satisfy the needs of staff, administrators and IT professionals alike. / Accelerate time -to -market by providing users with efficient tools to replace manual tracking processes. / Enable multiple departments to authorize changes the moment revisions need to occur, eliminating bottlenecks. / Trigger workflow activities from third -party applications. ii What sets Laserfiche apart from other ECM solutions is its ease of administration and use, which is why we chose it when we standardized our entire county. Laserfiche is the best choice for IT professionals, because it offers more functionality, lower overhead costs and an excellent R01. Darlene Hale, IT Director, LaPorte County, IN Laserfiche Avante readily fits into your existing networked environment, without requiring custom programming or extensive hardware and software updates. Developed to support close integration with industry -standard platforms, Laserfiche Avante is compatible with Windows XP through Windows 8 and supports Microsoft SQL Server° and Oracle° database management systems. / Administer your system using the desktop Administration Console, from a browser with the Laserfiche Web Administration Console or a snap -in for Microsoft Management Console (MMC1. / Use of WebDAV technology offers broad interoperability and integration options, as well as support for Microsoft's Web Folders. / Assign access rights and permissions directly to Active Directory groups, and maintain security through Windows Authentication. / Integrate your primary applications into Laserfiche workflows using the Windows Workflow Foundation and .NET. / Drag and drop e-mail from Microsoft Outlook' into Laserfiche, preserving e-mail metadata. Laserfiche Avante Architecture By providing central control alongside local flexibility, Laserfiche Avante enables your organization to establish overarching standards and security policies while at the same time giving individual departments the ability to store information and configure business processes according to their specialized needs. SMARTER OUTCOMES Publication and Distribution ............... VALUABLE CAPABILITIES AGILE FRAMEWORK Enterprise R01 for Risk Management Repeatable Processes Enterprise Personalized Interfaces Value Creation Information Portal Transparent Records Management Business Process Management Enterprise Classification Document Capture and ETL Auditing Enterprise Search and Retrieval Information Life Cycle Management By serving as the universal repository for all organizational content (including paper, forms, audio/video files, e-mail, etc.), Laserfiche Avante provides a single point of control for complete life cycle management. By acting as integrative middleware that links into Legacy systems and Line -of -business applications such as GIS, CRM, ERP and more, Laserfiche Avante allows users to access information in the manner and environment in which they are most comfortable. By enabling shared services, Laserfiche Avante eliminates data silos and automates cross -functional activities, accelerating collaboration and data processing. Laserfiche Avante System Diagram rV-1 Laserfiche Forms FOO Laserfiche Quick Fields r Laserfiche RME Capture Laserfiche Digital Signatures r'1 Secure ❑L �� Search & Retrieve Laserfiche Audit Trail Automate GX 0 Laserfiche Laserfiche Laserfiche Laserfiche Web Access WebLink Plus Mobile FM Laserfiche Agenda Manager Out -of -the -Box Functionality Laserfiche Avante's licensing is based on the number of people who will be using the system—which makes it possible to calculate the cost of most systems by doing little more than counting employees. Named user licenses include everything you need to get started. © Centralize management of multiple types of information, including digitized paper documents, electronic documents, a -mail and AN files. Servers are sold individually and support industry -standard Microsoft° and Oracle' database platforms. iy Give users intuitive, instant access to information. Users each have their own connection through the Laserfiche Client, so they are always able to access their information. Promote constant productivity with Laserfiche Workflow's rules -based routing, e-mail notification and activity monitoring. Add paper documents to your Laserfiche repository with an intuitive scanning interface. Create archival TIFF images of electronic documents, including PDFs, without repetitive printing and scanning. n Protect your information with comprehensive security features. Expand Beyond the Basics Laserfiche Avante's pricing structure makes it simple and affordable to add new features and functionality to your Laserfiche system as your needs change. Laserfiche Records Management Edition'" fully integrates DoD 5015.2 -certified records management with your Laserfiche Avante system. C, Laserfiche Audit TrailT" tracks user actions to ensure information security and simplify regulatory compliance. _,► Laserfiche Quick Fields' provides high-volume document capture and processing tools. ❑v Laserfiche Forms" ensures that appropriate action on submitted forms is taken quickly with user -defined approval processes and task lists. R Laserfiche Web AccessT" provides authorized users with access to your documents over the web, smartphones and tablets. ® Laserfiche Mobile TI for iOS and Android TM smartphones and tablets enables you to capture, upload and securely work with documents inside your Laserfiche repository while on the go. ® Laserfiche WebLinkTM offers a read-only public Web portal with secure, one -touch document publishing. OLaserfiche Plus'" archives documents on CDs, DVDs, USB drives or external hard drives in self-contained repositories that include built-in viewers and search engines. 7 Laserfiche Agenda Manager" automates agenda processes from item submission through publication of the final document. Jh Laserfiche Digital Signatures Automatically sign and validate documents as they are created, reviewed and archived without Leaving the Laserfiche environment. Technology represents one of the most significant investments you make in your organization's success. That's why Laserfiche is committed to constantly improving its product line to help you meet new business challenges. The Laserfiche Software Assurance Plan (LSAP) provides your organization with these enhancements as soon as they're released, along with the technical support and detailed technical material that preserves and extends the value of your Laserfiche investment. LSAP helps you take the guesswork out of budgeting by bundling everything you need to maintain your Laserfiche system into a simple annual payment. It ensures that you have every resource you need to meet technical challenges and expand your Laserfiche infrastructure, including: / Rapid -response technical support. Your Laserfiche reseller will promptly troubleshoot and resolve any issues that arise—before they impact operations or affect staff productivity. / Online support resources. Your staff receives access to the Laserfiche Support Site, where they'll find detailed technical information that helps them optimize system performance and maximize uptime, as well as integrate your document repository with your organization's other line -of -business applications. / The latest hotfixes, updates and patches. These critical items ensure that your Laserfiche system continues to operate at peak efficiency. / New releases. You'll make sure your system stays current, as new releases of your licensed products are included at no additional charge. / An easy path to growth. We're committed to continuously improving and expanding the Laserfiche product line. And as we do, you can credit 100% of the purchase price of your current Laserfiche software toward any new product Line purchases. Solution Exchangc [a.amxN� p.r r.a.-.� I-rMx�r4wTio••.W.,,�...w -,r: I—"Ml 1t dhl"AJ »h 14 AFR nl WpJm ,e l�n 4 ...EW_ NA—both 1­.od -11. IM.•—. 1♦ W our 41Ri l.nLry.,S.ona I .—efw hr I o '.AIIO `II. f—ft 5q — U. I— pl% vCl x'S. Fr l .s I%nU Nuc. W "Ac L. M W 4 mFrrh hm do do 10 dr r hOW FM i r• t&k ffeft%9 M Priwl[ Ir"Od W I Fr t4 n"h n CY. rd.t 4WLhRGS.1G6 T4. I FqW..&Fq a xm rM vr-. qr y.pR: I+. 1e mr. �I .Itll1 YY.n1o,A .•. WO.•1,•i4 Y uotilc✓J `•r�."- .� YcuaR. Fra4�- ..t A. - .. ... to-fY M ... T. _ i x �wr,.-,yw CY..wlrYi.IF aw..wn• Video tutorials provide hands-on .1 $1DN" instruction on how to use Laserfiche most effectively. 71W 0 Concrete examples of how other 4APM w :.... Laserfiche users have optimized L'N6h•F LoQ Q their systems offer inspiration and step-by-step advice. Fra4�- ..t A. - .. ... to-fY M ... T. _ i x �wr,.-,yw CY..wlrYi.IF aw..wn• Video tutorials provide hands-on .1 $1DN" instruction on how to use Laserfiche most effectively. 71W 0 A community of Laserfiche staff, users and resellers can be crowdsourced for Laserfiche best practices and innovative solutions. R_M14.IM.. .. .. . 4APM w L'N6h•F LoQ Q f 1YrYclli 'F e wevna r UpF,Q.dia41•'J t.r urR .crry brf' rwE�41.4`7.nr Q #Y.Nm■ # lli�h•1.f�. ... s f5 � C . ♦ Si2/ihY A community of Laserfiche staff, users and resellers can be crowdsourced for Laserfiche best practices and innovative solutions. With a world-class community, extensive training options and more, Laserfiche provides customers with more than just software—it provides a comprehensive framework for delivering value quickly, easily and without the need to bring in expensive experts at every turn. TRAINING KNOWLEDGE SHARING COMMUNITY / Annual conference / Solution Exchange / Case studies / Certified Professional ; / Integration Marketplace ; / User groups Program (CPP) ; / Laserfiche Answers / Newsletters / Regional workshops / Online support resources Laserfiche is more than software; it's a community that's dedicated to helping organizations work smarter. Drive true organizational agility by leveraging everything Laserfiche has to offer. Join the Laserfiche community Want to learn more? Explore Laserfiche Avante's functionality, discover industry solutions and get customer perspectives at: laserfiche.com/avante Q About Laserfiche Based in Long Beach, CA, with global headquarters in Hong Kong and offices in Shanghai, Toronto, Panama, London, Washington, D.C., and Fort Lauderdale, FL, Laserfiche uses its Run Smarter° philosophy to create • I simple and elegant enterprise content management (ECM) solutions. Since 1987, more than 34,000 organizations worldwide—including federal, • . state and local government agencies and Fortune 1000 companies—have used Laserfiche° software to streamline document, records and business • • 1 process management. 01019 The Laserfiche ECM system is designed to give organizations central 000, control over their information infrastructure while still offering business units the flexibility to react quickly to changing conditions. The Laserfiche 00041 product line—which supports Microsoft° SQL and Oracle° platforms to leverage technology investments—deploys ' • • • your existing rapidly, enhances efficiency and integrates seamlessly with the applications employees day. • • . use every © 2014 Laserfiche. %L • • • • Laserfiche is a division of Compulink Management Center, Inc. Laserfiche®, Run Smarter® and Compulinkaare registered trademarks of Compulink Management Center, Inc. Microsoft®, SharePoint®, Outlook®, Office® and re either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Android'" is a trademark of Google Inc. All other trademarks are properties of their respective other countries. • • • • , • • • • companies. Due to continuing product development, product specifications and capabilities are subject to change without notice. • • • • Run Smarter' City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 2I. Consideration to re -approve the Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement for Camping World First Addition/Maas Addition. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to re -approve the development contract for the Camping World/Maas Addition planned unit development. This is a housekeeping matter related to the timing language for recording stipulated in the agreement. The Final Stage PUD was approved and the site was rezoned to PUD in August of 2017. The PUD zoning and Final Stage PUD stand as approved and does not expire. However, the development contract approved at that time required execution and recording of the contract within 100 days of approval. The developer did not execute the development contract within the 100 days and therefore did not move forward with the projects requiring approval under the PUD. At this time, new management at Camping World would like to proceed with the approved PUD improvements. As such, as an administrative matter, the contract requires re -approval by the City Council. At this time, the developer is not seeking any change to the projects approved under the PUD or the conditions assigned under the approval. The developer has engaged a contractor to reinitiate the required plan revisions and submittals consistent with prior comments and conditions. The project includes the installation of two sanitary dump stations to the site, installation of a 130' flagpole, paving and curbing of additional sales area on the easterly lot including stormwater management, additional site lighting, and exterior improvements to the buildings on the easterly (Maas Addition) property. Council will note that the dump station design is subject to the review of the City Engineer. The development agreement has been revised to delete the condition requiring pumping of the dump stations, as it is now the recommended practice that they be discharged into the city's sanitary sewer system. Camping World will be required to pay all applicable SAC related to these stations. A tracked changes version of the proposed development agreement is included for Council reference. Changes to the approved development agreement include adjustments to the applicable trunk area charges for 2020 rates, as well as clerical changes related to resolutions and ordinance numbers. The applicant will be required to provide landscaping and grading costs for securities to complete the agreement, Other provisions remain substantively similar to the agreement approved in August, 2017. Al. Budget Impact: Execution of the contract in 2020 requires adjustment of the contract to 2020 escrow and trunk charge rates. These changes are reflected in the attached document. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Approximately 6-8 staff hours have been spent in examining prior approvals and revising the contract. City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement for Camping World First Addition/Maas Addition, subject to any revisions required by the City Attorney. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends re -approval of the contract as consistent with the prior approvals. Staff supports continued inclusion of the 100 day provision for recording as a means to move the project forward in a timely manner. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement for Camping World First Addition/Maas Addition B. 2017 Final Stage PUD Plans and Staff Report Dl kk AMENDMENT TO NT CgNTRACT and TAL USE PERMIT Installed Improvements) ■ AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREE CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION / MAAS ADDITWN HI ENDMENT TO DEVELOPIENT CON T V CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT("Agreement") is dated , 20_, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and FRHP LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). RECITALS A. The City and Developer previously entered into a Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit dated November 14, 2016 and filed of record on December 15, 2016, with the Wright County Recorder as Document No. A1332332 concerning the plat of Camping World FirstAddition ("Development Contract") 1 193833v5 B. Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Spirit"), is the owner of property legally described as Lot 1, Block I Maas Addition, Wright County, Minnesota, with a street address of 3887 Chelsea Road ("MA Addition") C. Developer transferred all right, title and interest in Lot 1, Block 1, Camping World First Addition, Wright County, Minnesota, with a street address of 3801 Chelsea Road to Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, pursuant to a Special Warranty Deed dated December 29, 2016, recorded January 11, 2017 as Wright County Document No. A 13 34431 ("CWF Addition") D. Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, Camping World First Addition are collectively re ed to as t " operty". E. t, as landlord, and CWI, Inc., a Kentucky corporati and Camping Worl V Ow Sales, LLC, a Minnesota lid liability company, as tenants, entered i a Lease Agreement ed December 29, 201 the Subject Property. CWc., Camping World RV LC and irit subsequently enter nto a Memorandum of Lease for the Subj t Property dated December 2 2016 and recorded January 2017 as Wright County Docurment No. A 34432. id Memorandum o ase grants tenants se term 0 0 years, withthree Successive periods of years each. F. The CWF Addition currently operates a recreational Vehicles Sales/Display and Auto Repair and service operation. The MA Addition is currently a large parking lot with two existing buildings located thereon. G. Developer, on behalf of Spirit, has requested an amendment to the Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and are seeking Planned Unit Development approval to accommodate the expansion of the CWF Addition (consisting of approximately 8.85 acres) by occupying the MA Addition (consisting of approximately 6 acres) to function cooperatively and support the main sales facility at the CWF Addition (the "Development"). H. Pursuant to City Code, Chapter 2, Section 2.4, a PUD agreement may be approved by a simple majority of the City Council after a public hearing was held on April 4t1i, 2017 and continued to 2 193833v5 July 11, 2017, and recommendation of the Planning Commission. The Developer shall follow the procedures and requirements of the PUD Development and the Development Contract. A PUD agreement shall be memorialized with an Amendment to the Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit, executed by the City and Developer, and recorded against the Subject Property. I. Except as otherwise specifically amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Development Contract are incorporated herein and shall remain in full force and effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors and assigns and shall be recorded against the Subject Property in the office of the Wright County Recorder as promptly as possible after it has been ex t e parties. AM M"M NOW, THEREFORE, THE TIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONDITIONS OF OVAL. The City hereby apWes this Agreement the Planned Unit Deve pment ("PUD") conditioned upfthe DI per entering inta� Agreeme furnishing the sec required by it, and recording this Agreeme t upon SubjectPropertyw he County Recorder egistr of Titles within oIs n dyed (100 s aft e City Council app d the Developi'l�it. OF The City hereby grants approval to the Planned Unit Development provided the Development is consistent with the conditions of this Agreement and the specific City conditions, requirements and PUD flexibility as set forth in City Resolution 2017-054, adopted by the Monticello Council on August 14th, 2017, and subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff Report dated August 14th, 281-X2017. The City hereby grants approval to the rezoning of the Subject Property pursuant to Resolution No. PC -2017-016 as adopted by the Planning Commission on July 11, 2017, and per Ordinance No. 663 as adopted by the City Council on August 17th, 2017, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other City requirements which are in effect. 2. CONDITION FOR SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS. No changes or amendments to the PUD Agreement shall be approved, nor shall construction commence for such additional land uses, until 193833v5 an amendment of the PUD Agreement is processed and approved, subject to the requirements of the Monticello Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, including the submission of site plans, final grading and drainage plans, final utility plans, and final landscaping plans. 3. ZONING. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Subject Property shall be subject to the zoning regulations for the Planned Unit Development District and in accordance with the plans as identified in Section "4" of this Agreement. 4. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the plans listed below ("Plans"). The Plans shall be as approved with conditions by the City of Monticello 17. TheanPl s shall not be attached to this Agreement. The Plans maysprepared,1 su to City approval, after entering the Agreement, but befre commencement of any work or on the IP Sub t Property. If the Plans vary fro written trs of this Agreem the plans shall con The Plans are: A. Certificate of Survey Parking Lot Expansior Camping Worl B. Existing Topography and Removals Plan C. Grading, Construction, Drainage and Erosi ontrol Plan D. Details Plan (2 pages) Opp -E. Stormtech SC -740 Chamber System tail an F. SC -740 Chamber System Standard ross Sec ion Plan G. SC -740 Isolator Row Details Plan H. Stormwater Management Plan I. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan J. Site Plan (with waste water dump stations) K. Landscaping Plan L. Sign & Flag plan M. Pylon Sign Detail Plan N. Monument Sign Detail plan O. Fence Detail Plan P. Photometric Plan Q. ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Plan 5. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following as required to be built within the Development as improvements in accordance with the Plans, as approved with conditions by the City of Monticello on August 14t`, 2017: 4 193833v5 A. Parking Lots B. Concrete Curb and Gutter C. Street lights D. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control E. Landscaping F. Underground Utilities G. Setting of Iron Monuments H. Surveying and Staking The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City Code and the approved Plans. The Developer will not perform any heavy construction between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. The Developer mmq§ sha 1 submit plans and specification ermit which&eer prepared by a competent registered professional engine to the City for approval by the C which approval shall be provided on the M4 conton that such mitta mply with the Plans and this Agreement.Le Developer shall instruct its engineer or a separ to third -p Mnsultant to pro adegle field inspection ersonnel to assure an 1 acc ble level of lity control. The Developer shall provide fdr on -sit oject management t{ia a Co ction Superintendent. In addition, the Developer shall provide a Construction Project Manager and De ment Construction>anager to oversee the ►Development and be responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer, or its engineer or General Contractor shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 6. SANITARY SEWER TRUNK CHARGE. The MA Addition is subject to a charge for Sanitary Sewer Trunk expenses in the amount of $10,914.4084.80, which includes all platted lots within the Development, payable at the time of Final Stage PUD approval or building or grading permit for the proposed improvements on the MA Addition. The fee is calculated as follows: $3,8983 .00/gross acre x 2.8 gross acres = $10,914.409- 4W 193833v5 7. WATER TRUNK CHARGE. The MA Addition is subject to a charge for Water Trunk expenses in the amount of $6,865.60, which includes all platted lots within the Development, payable at the time of Final Stage PUD approval or building or grading permit for the proposed improvements on the MA Addition. The fee is calculated as follows: $2.882252.00/gross acre x 2.84 gross acres = $8,184.8860 8. STORM SEWER CHARGE. The MA Addition is subject to a charge for Storm Sewer Trunk expenses in the amount of $11,659,209- -.40, which includes all platted lots within the Development, payable at the time of Final Stage PUD approval or building or grading permit for the propoWd improvements of the MA -h -Addition. amendment. The fee is calculated as follows: 44 $4,164.00 543/gross acre x 2 9. development: SP IAL IS. The i A. Implementation of the recommendations listed in Resolution 42017-054XX, adopted August 14th, 2017. 14th, 2017. B. Implementation of all the conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff Report dated August C. Meet the architectural materials requirements of the pylon sign standards, including wrapping sign support pole with materials consistent with the building finishes. D. Applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the monument encroachment into the Chelsea Road right of way. E. Verify that the revised landscaping plan meets code requirements by providing quantity and size for existing landscaping and supplementing planting on site to meet code, if required. F. Demonstrate FAA review and approval for flagpole as required. 6 193833v5 G. Comply with the comments of the City Engineer per the checklist included with the staff report of July 11th, 2017 and letter dated July 17', 2017 H. Developer shall execute and record a stormwater maintenance agreement. I. Location of the proposed RV dump stations is subject to the review and comment of the City Engineer relative to the location of existing municipal utilities and connections. Tanks must be located 12' from the property lines and may not encroach into drainage and utility easements. j. RAI clump stations are not allov�,ed to discharge into the City's sanitary sewe system and will be required to be pttnipe4. M.!L__Al its for RV d tations shall be obtained. . All site lightin all compl t ty of Monticello code requireme 1�L. Applicant sha ter into a evelopment agree t for the proposed ed unit development. �M. The Develo all furnish the City with a cash security, or letter of c t, in the form attached hereto from a bank, ("Security") in the amount of $ for installation of site landscaping in compliance with the approved Grading and Landscaping Plarl 0-.N. The Developer shall pay the cost for the preparation of record construction drawings and City base map upgrading by the City Engineer as part of the Administrative / Engineering Fee. Ph. 0. The Developer must obtain a sign permit from the City prior to installation of any signs for the development. 10. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. A. The Developer shall also furnish the City with a Security for $8,400.00 for grading in compliance with approved Plan "H". This amount was calculated as follows. $3,000/acre X 2.8 acres = $8,400.00 GRADING/EROSION SECURITY: 7 193833v5 Erosion Control/Grading Certification $ 8,400.00 B. The Developer shall also furnish the City with a Security for $(To be provided by developer) for landscaping in compliance with approved Plan 'W'. This amount was calculated as follows. C. The amount of the security includes all of the security requirements set forth in the preceding sections of this Agreement, and was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Site Landscaping provide estimated landscaping costs X 125% SUB -TIP TOTAL: CONSTRUCTION $Developer to $ $ D. This breakdown is for h>itorical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of curity. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator, which consent shall not be unreasonably wit . T]down urity s be for n automatically rene ' term. Individual se ty instruments may for shterms p ed are replace least y (30) days prior t eir expiration. The City may the upon five (5) ness ys' prior written no to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement. Amounts drawn shall not exceed the amounts necessary to cure to the default. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied in accordance with the Plans, the security shall be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed and all financial obligations to the City satisfied. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 193833v5 11. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Agreement which must be furnished to the City prior to Final Stage PUD approval or building or grading permit: City Engineering Expenses, escrow 3% Grading & Restoration (Developer to provide estimatedrgrading cost) 12. City Administration Expenses, escrow Administration, Legal, Planning Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge Water Trunk Charge Storm Sewer Charge (Base) Total Cash Requirements to the City Areral la d regul s, i ding but not and environmen egulation t ity determine $ 2,000.00 $10,914.40°,'� 84-90 $8184.88 $11,659.209;920:40 $XX, XXX.M" 07&88 Development complies wi11 city, ,d to, subdivision ordinances, zoning the Development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the Development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the Subject Property or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the Subject Property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Subject Property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. Any transfer of an ownership interest in the Subject Property is an assignment of the rights and obligations herein to the subsequent owner. 9 193833v5 Agreement. C. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Developer under this D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal actiont1% o is Agree jbe a waiver De perd the City from claims made by third 1prties, including but no aMM andployees property owners, tenants, contractors, subcontractors, and materialmen, for damages sustained, costs incurred or injurieulting from the Developer's negligent, reckless or willful misconduct. The Developer will indemnif City and its officers, agents, and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, including reasonabl en ine� Bring ari torney's fees, which the City pay or incur in consequence of such claim cept if caused by City negligence, reckless or willful misconduct. G. In addition to all legal or equitable remedies, breach of any material term of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 10 193833v5 I. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the development, commercial general liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its contractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The insurance may be provided by a single policy or multiple policies including excess of or umbrella policies and shall have limits for bodily injury and death not less than $1,000,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $2,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an ad 1tiona insured on the policies, wandthVeveloper shall file with the Ci Ancing coverage prior to the City releasing the Plat for recording or issuing any p 'ts. In the event the City has A ' not received this prior to the start of construction, the Developer shall halt all work until a certificate has been provided to the City. The City shall be listed as an additional insured on all po 'es. The certificate I shall provide that the City must be given advance written noticJeth ca lation of the ins ura e. J. f Each right, power or remedy herein cd upon the City is cumulati e and in ad ' 'on to every other rightwer or remedy, expless or impw or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. The Developer will pay in full all invoices submitted to it by the City within sixty (60) days after receipt which reasonably evidence those costs incurred in the drafting, enforcement and supervision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering, planning, and attorney's fees. If the invoices are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work until the invoices are paid in full. Invoices not paid within sixty (60) days shall be subject to an eight percent (8%) per annum interest charge. 11 193833v5 L Developer shall be responsible for all snow removal from sidewalks and trails on developed and vacant lots and outlots to the extent that City Ordinance requires snow removal from the Subject Property. Developer shall be responsible for ensuring that all vacant lots comply with the City's Code regarding nuisances. intentionally left pages follow.] 12 193833v5 Signature page to Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement (SEAL) ST OF MINNESOTA C TY OF WRIGHT The foregoing instrument N , 20 , by of the City of Monticello, a Minne to the authority granted by its City CITY OF MONTICELLO In Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator J1 ;ed before me this _ #nd by Jeff O'Neill, corporation, on beha: Notary Public day of Mayor and the corpora 13 193833v5 Signature page to Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement STATE OF COMM#4- 4 The fore oing instrument was 2017, by Brent Moody, the Chief Opi Minnesota limited liability company, c DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ DEVELOPER: FRHP LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC Brent Moody, Chief Operating and Legal Officer xledged before me this day of and Legal officer of FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC, a If of the limited liability company. 14 193833v5 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SPIRIT REALTY, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, fee owner of all or part of the Subject Property, more particularly described in the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement, does hereby join in, affirms and consents to the granting of the Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement. ST, CO Dated this day of , 2017. SPIRIT REALTY, L.P A Delaware limited partnership . By: SPMIT GENERAL OP HThmiptedility Its general partner a Delaware company IP Vice The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Boyd Messmann, the Executive Vice President of Spirit General OP Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the general partner of Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 15 193833v5 LESSEE'S CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CWI, INC., a Kentucky corporation, which has a lease holder's interest in all or part of the Subject Property, more particularly described in the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement, pursuant to that certain Lease with Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, dated December 29, 2016, and said Memorandum of Lease dated December 29, 2016, recorded January 11, 2017, as Wright County Document No. A1334432, or good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, affirms and consents to the granting of the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement. Dated this day of , 2017. STATE OF ( ss. COUNTY OF CWI, Inc. A Kentucky corporation In Brent Moody, Chief Operating and Legal Officer The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Brent Moody, the Chief Operating and Legal officer of CWI, INC., a Kentucky corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 16 193833v5 LESSEE'S CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CAMPING WORLD RV SALES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, which has a lease holder's interest in all or part of the Subject Property, more particularly described in the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement, pursuant to that certain Lease with Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, dated December 29, 2016, and said Memorandum of Lease dated December 29, 2016, recorded January 11, 2017, as Wright County Document No. A1334432, or good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, affirms and consents to the granting of the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement. Dated this day of , 2017. STATE OF ( ss. COUNTY OF CAMPING WORLD RV SALES, LLC, A Minnesota limited liability company Brent Moody, Chief Operating and Legal Officer The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2017, by Brent Moody, the Chief Operating and Legal officer of Camping World RV Sales, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 17 193833v5 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT TO: City of Monticello Dear Sir or Madam: No. _ Date: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2 , of (Name of Bank; b) Be accompanied by an affidavit signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello certifying that is in default of the Development Contract with the City of Monticello and that five (5) business days prior written notice has been given by the City to the Developer with respect to the existence of such default, and such default has not been cured. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank), on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. 1m Its 18 193833v5 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE LIABILITY & WORKERS' COMPENSATION This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed below. PROJECT: CERTIFICATE HOLDER & ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Monticello ADDRESS: ARCH/ENGR: INSURED: ADDRESS: AGENT: ADDRESS: WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE—/—/ INSURANCE COMPANY: COVERAGE -Workers' Compensation, Statutory. Employers' Liability Limit $ Each Accident $ Disease Policy Limit $ ($500,000 Policy limit applies to both accident and disease) GENERAL LIABILITY EXPIRATION DATE Disease Employee Limit POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE / / EXPIRATION DATE INSURANCE COMPANY: ( )Claims Made ( )Occurrence ( )Owner's & Contractors Protective LIMITS: General Aggregate Limit (Other Than Products -Completed Operations) $ Products -Completed Operations Aggregate Limit $ Personal & Advertising Injury Limit $ Each Occurrence $ ( ) Other 19 193833v5 COVERAGE PROVIDED Operations of Contractor: Yes Operations of Sub -Contractor (Contingent): Yes Does Personal Injury Include Property Damage Liability Includes Claims Related to Employment: Yes Completed Operations/Products: Yes. Contractual Liability (Broad Form): Yes EXCEPTIONS: Damage Due to Collapse No Government Immunity is Waived Yes No. No Property Damage Liability Includes Damage Due to Blasting Yes No No Damage Due to Collapse Yes No No Damage To Underground Facilities Yes No No Broad Form Property Damage Yes No. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE: / / EXPIRATION DATE: INSURANCE COMPANY: ( )Any Auto ( )All Owned Autos ( )Hired Autos ( )Non -Owned Autos LIMITS: ( )Scheduled Autos Bodily Injury $ Each Person / $ Each Occurrence OR Combined Single Limit $ Property Damage $ Each Occurrence UMBRELLA EXCESS LIABILITY POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE:—/—/-- EXPIRATION DATE: INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITS: Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage $ Each Occurrence $ Aggregate COVERAGE PROVIDED: Applies in excess of the coverages listed above for Employers' Liability, General Liability, and Automobile Liability: Yes No Are any deductibles applicable to bodily injury or property damage on any of the above coverages? Yes No If So, List Amount $ AGENT CARRIES ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE: Yes No Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 days' notice to the parties to whom this certificate is issued. Dated at: MN License # Authorized Insurance Representative On: an 20 193833v5 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT , a , which holds a mortgage on the on the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development, agrees that the Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgages. Dated this day of , 2017. STATE OF COUNTY OF By: Its And: Its )ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by and and ,a DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ Notary Public day of on its behalf. [print name] [print name] 20 , the of 21 193833v5 City Council Agenda — 08/14/2017 20. Consideration to aDDrove a request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development a request for Final Stage Planned Unit Development for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Auto Repair — Minor, and Accessory Office and Retail Uses in a B-3 (Highway Business) District, including allowance for 130' flag pole height, amendment to Development Agreement for Camping World First Addition and License Agreement for sign encroachment. Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 1 Maas Addition, together with Lot 1, Block 1 Camping World First Addition PID: 155225001010,155243001010 Planning Case Number: 2017-011 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Final Stage PUD Rezoning to PUD District Deadline for Decision: Applicant request to table to July Planning Commission meeting Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: B-3, Highway Business District The purpose of the B-3 district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District Current Site Use: Vehicle Service and Vehicle Sales/Display Surrounding Land Uses: North: I-94 East: Multi -tenant Commercial South: Vacant Commercial Land West: Motorsports Dealership City Council Agenda — 08/14/2017 ANALYSIS The applicant, Camping World/FRHP Lincolnshire, LLP, is seeking Final Stage PUD approval and rezoning to PUD for the uses and site layout as proposed with their Development Stage PUD application, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 28',2017. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Development Stage PUD, subject to a list of conditions which the City Council approved on July 28th, 2017, with some modification. To follow is a summary of the conditions assigned to the Development Stage PUD approval by the City Council, along with an analysis of the resolution of the conditions for Final Stage approval to -date. 1. Meet the architectural materials requirements of the pylon sign standards. Current plan revised to meet area and height requirements; sign requires that the support pole be wrapped with materials consistent with building finishes. Compliance reviewed at sign permit application. 2. Enforce the requirements for monument sign relocation at 3810 Chelsea Road, by moving the sign out of the right of way; or if location is approved by the City, the applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the encroachment. Applicant shall enter into a License Agreement for the sign encroachment. License agreement attached. Provide curbing around the entire paved area, consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance. Addressed. Shown on revised plans. 4. Revise landscaping plan to provide quantity and species for proposed landscaping along south portion of the site. Applicant proposes to retain existing boulevard trees. No additional plantings proposed. Applicant shall verify that existing landscaping complies with base landscaping standards, which require 10 ACI of overstory trees per acre and 2 shrubs per 10 feet of building perimeter on site, and shall plant on the PUD site to meet the standard if not compliant. 5. Provide materials and height detail for proposed ornamental fence. Provided and shown on revised plans. 6. Accommodate the proposed flagpole height of 130 feet. 2 City Council Agenda — 08/14/2017 Shown on plans. 7. Locate the flagpole at a distance from the east and north property line a distance of 30' Addressed. Shown on revised plans. 8. Demonstrate FAA review and approval for flagpole as required. Applicant to provide this verification. 9. Upgrade the existing buildings with exterior architectural treatments to meet/exceed the requirements for commercial buildings within one year. Addressed. Applicant proposes to finish the buildings with EIFS materials in brand -consistent colors. Areas where existing garage doors are in place are not proposed to change. Metal roof not proposed for change. 10. Revise site and building plans to illustrate consistency in proposed improvements. Addressed Revised plans are consistent with one another. 11. Comply with the comments of the City Engineer per the checklist included with the staff report of July 11 th, 2017. Applicant shall be required to enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement for the proposed system and shall be subject to resolution of any remaining items on the stornwater checklist as noted by the City Engineer. 12. Verification by staff of the proper utility services and location/circulation improvements and compliance with staff recommendations related to the proposed dump stations, to be included in the Final Stage plans and approval. The applicant has included in their final stage site plan the location of two 2,000 gallon RV dump stations, one on the primary lot, and one on the former Bedrock site. These facilities are subject to the review and comment of the City Engineer and Water & Sewer Superintendent, including those comments detailed in the letter dated July 1911, 2017. These stations will not be allowed to discharge into the City's sanitary sewer system and will be required to be pumped. Further, final location of these facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the City relative to the location of existing municipal utilities and connections. 13. Applicant shall enter into a development agreement for the proposed planned unit development. 3 City Council Agenda — 08/14/2017 A draft amendment to development agreement is included for Council review and approval. It should be noted that FRHP Lincolnshire, the original property owner and current applicant for the Camping World PUD, has since sold the underlying property to Spirit Realty, LP which leases the property back to Camping World. The development agreement incorporates this assignment. If substantive changes to the agreement are made, the development agreement may require additional review and approval. Based on the above, staff has prepared a revised list of conditions applicable to the Final Stage PUD approval, attached as Exhibit Z. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2017-54, approving Final Stage Planned Unit Development and Rezoning to Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block Camping World First Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition. 1. Motion to deny adoption Resolution No.2017-54, approving Final Stage Planned Unit Development and Rezoning to Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block Camping World First Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition. 2. Motion to table action, subject to additional information to be submitted by the applicant and/or staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Alternative #1 above, subject to those conditions identified in Exhibit Z. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution No. 2017-54 B. Ordinance No. 663 C. Aerial Site Image D. Applicant Narrative E. Final Stage PUD Plans, including: a. Site Plan b. Existing Topography c. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan d. Details e. Site Plan f. Photometric Plan F. Building Elevations G. Pylon Sign Detail H. Monument Sign Detail I. Flagpole Structural M City Council Agenda — 08/14/2017 J. City Engineer's Letter, July 17th, 2017 K. Stormwater Checklist L. Certificate of Survey M. Amendment to Development Agreement, draft N. License Agreement, draft Z. Conditions of Approval Exhibit Z Camping World PUD 3801, 3887 Chelsea Road Lot 1, Block 1 Camping World First Addition Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition 1. Meet the architectural materials requirements of the pylon sign standards, including wrapping sign support pole with materials consistent with the building finishes. 2. Applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the monument encroachment into the Chelsea Road right of way. 3. Verify that the revised landscaping plan meets code requirements by providing quantity and size for existing landscaping and supplementing planting on site to meet code, if required. 4. Demonstrate FAA review and approval for flagpole as required. 5. Comply with the comments of the City Engineer per the checklist included with the staff report of July 11th, 2017 and letter dated July 17th, 2017 6. Developer shall execute and record a stormwater maintenance agreement. 7. Location of the proposed RV dump stations is subject to the review and comment of the City Engineer relative to the location of existing municipal utilities and connections. Tanks must be located 12' from the property lines and may not encroach into drainage and utility easements. 8. RV dump stations are not allowed to discharge into the City's sanitary sewer system and will be required to be pumped. 9. All required permits for RV dump stations shall be obtained. 10. All site lighting shall comply with City of Monticello code requirements. 11. Applicant shall enter into a development agreement for the proposed planned unit development. 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-54 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO PUD FOR FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CAMPING WORLD PUD DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to rezone its property along Chelsea Road, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1 Camping World First Addition, together with Lot 1, Block 1 Maas Addition, from B-3, Highway Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for retail recreational vehicle sales and service and related accessory uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 4th, and continued hearing on July 11th, 2017 on the Development Stage PUD and rezoning and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the applicant has revised and submitted Final Stage PUD plans in accordance with the Development Stage PUD, subject to those remaining conditions as identified in the staff report of August 14th, 2017, and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for retail vehicle sales, display and service is consistent with the direction of the Comprehensive Plan for "Places to Shop". 3. The plan, through PUD, results in a project that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the application of the standard zoning regulations. 4. The plan results in development that is compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-54 5. The improvements proposed for the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance. 6. The improvements will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 7. The PUD flexibility for the project, including site coverage, building materials, display, and signage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Final Stage PUD for the Camping World PUD District, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Meet the architectural materials requirements of the pylon sign standards, including wrapping sign support pole with materials consistent with the building finishes. 2. Applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the monument encroachment into the Chelsea Road right of way. 3. Verify that the revised landscaping plan meets code requirements by providing quantity and size for existing landscaping and supplementing planting on site to meet code, if required. 4. Demonstrate FAA review and approval for flagpole as required. 5. Comply with the comments of the City Engineer per the checklist included with the staff report of July 11th, 2017 and letter dated July 17th, 2017 6. Developer shall execute and record a stormwater maintenance agreement. 7. Location of the proposed RV dump stations is subject to the review and comment of the City Engineer relative to the location of existing municipal utilities and connections. Tanks must be located 12' from the property lines and may not encroach into drainage and utility easements. 8. RV dump stations are not allowed to discharge into the City's sanitary sewer system and will be required to be pumped. 9. All required permits for RV dump stations shall be obtained. 10. All site lighting shall comply with City of Monticello code requirements. K CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-54 11. Applicant shall enter into a development agreement for the proposed planned unit development. ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL LO -A 3 Brian Stumpf, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 663 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE CAMPING WORLD PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO CAMPING WORLD PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION, TOGETHER WITH LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MAAS ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MON,]ELL0 HEREBY ORDAINS: i Section 1. Section 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Dev hereby amended by adding the following: (XX) Camping World PUD Distric (a) Purpose. ThV07F of provide for thelopir. ' District for vehicle sales, — Zoning Ordinance is PUD District is to tate subject to the commercial land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Camping World PUD District shall be vehicle sales, display, and vehicle service and repair — minor and major, as found in the B-3, Highway Business District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated August 14th, 2017, and development agreement dated August 14th, 2017, as may be amended. The introduction of ay other use from any district, including Conditional Uses in the B-3 District, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to retail uses, and as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. Accessory buildings on the site may be utilized for indoor uses for enterprises of commercial tenants which are identified as permitted principal uses in the B-3, Highway Business District. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Camping World PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development ORDINANCE NO. 663 agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the B-3, Highway Business District shall apply. (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (P)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amendment to rezoned the following described parcels from B-3, Highway Business District to Camping World PUD, Planned Unit Development District: Lot 1, Block 1, Camping World First Addition, and Lo ock 1, Maas Addition. *1 Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. 161 Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordi%necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerkler directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. 14r Secti This Ordinance shall take effec Wd be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publicatiop. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available onlin* at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Montic4 City Council this day of , 2017. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. 663 AYES: NAYS: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC.- Request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) & Develop Stage PUD Lt 1, Blk 1 Maas Add n; Lt 1, Blk 1 Camping World First Add I PID 155-225-001010; 155-243-001010 Created by: City of Monticello Revised — August 4, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Camping World — PUD Application Narrative — Lot 1, Block 1 Maas Addition, PID 155-225-001010 I Lot 1, Block 1 Camping World First Addition, PID 155-243-001010 Camping World has purchased the Bedrock Motors site on the south side of the freeway at 3887 Chelsea Road in Monticello, MN. The applicant has applied for this PUD to clarify the use of the property and to seek approval of various elements necessary to their business that either exceed or vary from the current zoning regulations. They desire to increase the paved area, install additional storm water infrastructure utilizing underground infiltration, install additional site lighting to match the existing on the site, install new graphics to an existing monument sign at Chelsea Road, install a new 130' flag pole and install a new 32' tall 200 sq ft pylon sign which will replace an existing pylon sign in the same location. They also intend to add a combination of both chain link and ornamental iron fencing to surround the site, including gates at all existing remaining entrances. They also intend to add an access across the property line to their adjacent property at the NW corner of the parcel. They also have submitted a landscape plan for review. They have submitted a land use application. The paving plan exceeds the current allowable impervious area. This deviation is necessary for the applicant to increase their ability to have more inventory available for sale. Increased inventory will directly impact the applicant's ability and need to add additional jobs in the community. The grading and construction plans for the site illustrate the new storm water infrastructure, paving and curbing proposed for the parcel. All newly paved areas will include curb and gutter to comply with city code. The plan also indicates closing the access and removing the curb cut at the SE corner of the parcel. They are looking at options to change the exterior of the existing building to comply with city zoning requirements. We will be achieving this by installing an EIFS finish on the side walls of the buidlings. Camping World is also submitting site plans with waste water dump stations for RV dumping. These will be contained in tanks and pumped into truck when full. They will not be connected to the city sewer system. The applicant does not anticipate any platting associated with this application. It is their intention to maintain these as separate parcels. The existing buildings at 3887 Chelsea Road (former Bedrock Motors) are being used for pre -delivery inspections and for detailing; little customer traffic is anticipated in this area. The existing building at 3801 Chelsea Road will continue to be the primary customer destination. There is no screening for trash containers planned or anticipated on the parcel at 3887 Chelsea Road (former Bedrock Motors). All trash generated at this location is deposited in containers at the main location on the adjacent property. The new pylon sign proposed does comply with the city code. Several items that are within the Project Narrative requirements do not apply to this project as it is not a development project. Those items include: (1) whether the applicant will be the builder or if the land will be sold to other builders (2) Phasing (3) Plans or documents for Homeowner's Association (4) Possible negative impacts to surrounding property and mitigation measures, and (5) A statement of the proposed use of the lots, stating type of residential buildings with number of proposed dwelling units and type of business or industry to reveal the effect of development on traffic, fire hazards, etc. We acknowledge that there may be additional fees from the City of Monticello such as trunk charges, landscape security deposits, sign permits, etc. Contacts for this project are as follows: Owner: Camping World and Good Sam Melissa Nance Director of RE and Development 250 Parkway Drive, Suite 270 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 847-229-6755 Local Representative: Kinghorn Company 21830 Industrial Court Rogers, MN 55374 763-428-8088 Civil Engineer: Hakanson Anderson Charles Christopherson 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 763-427-5860 0 z Cn X W Ln O LCA I) 7) T) O Lri Q E n n, / LCA L U W O �00� o � Cl- Q) I 0-0 0 0 Q .. six L----- 955------------------�---�----------bt---------�---------�---------- 955-------0---------�� / \\ I-----------------956--------------------95-------------------------- .e ------ 957------------------------ ---------------------------- - -----------q57-------- --------------- - - I 1 \;% I \sem r....���—����—���--���------�--- R� III \\ \ \ 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -��� ------------------------------95-6957--------------------------- - I\ — -, C ,9,V ------ ---------------------- - - - - — — — — — — / LO 6 �\ \ I \ _ -- I I \ �\---------------955------ ------ G G G I j I I SAWCUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE E.O.F. \ I CURB \gym�� 1 955.7 o LT, `01\ \ �/ L �'/� g�5'1• 5 `; I > 1 W \ L \`\\ \ \ 1 954.69 • ( g57.'�3 0 \ I Z a' \ L ` g 1 SB B8 1 a I III 1 5 \ 955.50 rn SB B7 tA I �� I • ' ° ° A \ / •I r I III t °� � h ° / • I`_ 4 A e 0) \\x i a v / 08 1954 REQ _ D 11 g d 95 g50�6 fi V / ii s\ \ \ \ S6`�--------- In 00 V / v 100 1 100 4 10 100 W / i4/ •i%�// \ �./ I 956.43 ♦♦ SB 610 ♦ / \\� ` \ S66B9to 100 too S8 '\\` \ \\ 00 100 ♦00 DRAINAGE AND 0040 �Q ��; ► /// \\\I\\\ \\ UTILITY EASEMENT --957--- ♦♦ e� 1 \\\`\ \ 1 _ _ /' ---�� - \\``a\ \ 1 /'� \\ ♦� ♦� �� a-epe�----___ /, `°�\ REMOVE♦♦' \ \\ BITUMINOUS00 teeter 9s, - \ \ I PAVEMENT ♦'' _ (TY P .) / I'� Gas Metereter / w(L 0111 yh '/00 ///♦♦' ,/ . /\ \\;\\ 9ss\ ,�' \\ \ \`,��\\II \\ 11 11 ♦♦''♦ � � v gu\\d\n9 F� 95�• `!Y � \\�\�� \\ 10- \\\ \ \ \ ► \ ♦♦� ♦ �� \st\n9 �� \ \`\ \ V \\ I 1 � \ \ \/ \\ �� `� r- \ I 1\\ \ \ \\ \ ♦ ♦' oa I I '� BAR �= r_B„R I 1 � 1 1 I ``a \\ ` \\ � ♦' � a F�o95 \0 T -BUR CB 13i I 1 I \`` \ \ \ ♦ ♦ ♦/ \ \` 1 1 1 \ RE,952kr8 \\\ 111 \04) 0 .7 �P� II 1 ``\ \\ \ \\ �����♦ / ♦ I \ ce g5 I \\ \\\� \\ \ /// \ /�� •�\E (56g \ \ R Ng48 60 I I I �\ \ 1 / / gb ' e S ° r ° \\ \\\` SAWCUT \�---- ----- \ \ I \ I I 01 \ , BITUMINOUS \\ PAVEMENT ---958--------- e 40♦ n \I `\ ♦♦ ---955-------- \ 15 0 \ MH 6 asaap ,12 8 _ Stoll', es \ g5$2 ` v REQ ,9478a v \ / e '8): g 47 50 p 1 1 _ \E 5i�_ -- 9 Stori4 iii rn �` rn MH = _= 1 / 1 — Ri`-•&S6- N Meter - u —__ III III CIENTgt°rn 40---- At I 7 > '- E _ 946.77 8 \\ J iii iii I / E,95 980 g1 ro/ > IE SSS )-946.18 \ \ nl Post / R g4 0 6. 1 I 905 IEO 2.28 \iii v II 00 °st Post '� nce N)' g.2 ce (SW) ­99.46.7g \ N _ — / II nce P �` Fence \ Fe // \\E `SE) -g4 0 an 5 _�_- '!E(N4y)_ 1 9 CB — — — — II' III 1 Fe l� 4 4" 4 �q I llo� 4„ q" c+ ?\E-(1,, _ 3 US\Hess III II \ -OUR FO-BUR-p_BUR FO -BUR FO -BUR F /��UR FO -BUR \�\�� R 0 -BUR FO -BUR FO -BUR _FD -BUR �-FO-BUR FO -BUR FO -BUS FO- - SFO /�'R FO -BUR 1`\` >> - IE=952.50� B 5\9n j I \ \ ce P°st/ vv , 957 ence`�P°st CB 55,42 \ - /II \_ ._Fen CLEAR A;QJD"� F E,9 FO -BUR BUR \ San MH ��rr \ 5 RE=956.18 >> -___ {i ' - - - _ _ __ _ y�S _ — » ------ —�! L---- -- —------- - ---� ------------------------------------------------ ---------------------- —---------------------------------- ---------- > -------------------- ---- ---`------------ .�=fir �' �'� `� G R C1 B TREE �'� E ------------------ — — ---- - — _ --- -------------- ---- » 36" RCP _ _ » D » » » » » » » » >> \ 0 RE=95388 \ \ \ _ > Storm MH 36" RCP \ 36" R >> >> » » » >> \ >> Stor H >> \ San MH � � � IE (N)=948.78 � \ \ 36" RCP \ gS E (S� 950.88 RE=957.22 58 G 1 9 CHELSEA ROAD � IE (S)=948.48 g _ I _ ��9 > RE -957 93 i S, \ o IE N 948.73 6 `\ I \ 5 > > IE(SE) 445.07 I�(W/E)=944.18 \ \ \ IE (WEE)=942.73 CB I \\\\ ` /�/ son W �/ ,/ N 9 / / A ` RE=956.08 RE' n ra SAWCUT AND REMOVE / 58 \, CONCRETE CURB I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I TAE H a k a n s nn A n d e rs o n am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CAMPING WORLD EAST of the State of MI ta. DRAWN BY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 lef t J/_�) — 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 PARKING LOT EXPANSION 11M01HY A. (ZINS CHECKED BY: Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CJJ www.hakanson—anderson.com GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE REMOVAL OF UTILITIES AND LIGHTING AS NEEDED. 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY SHEET AND REMOVALS PLAN C1 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA OF C8 SHEETS 3395.05 DATE REVISION 4 7 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW 4/26/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW 6 15 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW 7 7/17 1 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW 7118417 REVISED TOTAL SHEETS 8/3/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW CONCRETE CURB I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I TAE H a k a n s nn A n d e rs o n am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CAMPING WORLD EAST of the State of MI ta. DRAWN BY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 lef t J/_�) — 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 PARKING LOT EXPANSION 11M01HY A. (ZINS CHECKED BY: Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CJJ www.hakanson—anderson.com GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE REMOVAL OF UTILITIES AND LIGHTING AS NEEDED. 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY SHEET AND REMOVALS PLAN C1 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA OF C8 SHEETS 3395.05 U) CD Z 0 Q CD LO O Ln Ln 0 Ln W Q r) / -1t LCA U W 0 �00� o / C\I � 0-0 0 C7) U Q .. \\ / v 0 GL= GL=957.75 \ / 955.38 I \ \\ I %------955-- \\ I 1 GL= \ I 954.72 I s, 1 I \ A I I I I j n GL=95; Pot I i IGL=954.05 \ g- I I (MATCH �I EXISTING) I \ \ \ s __- GL_95 I I GL=954.39 I \\ \\ �6' GL= 9. LO I I I \\ `9\ 6 m - - - - I I' GL= 1 \ 't ss G j I I GL= 953.861 \p\r 9 1 954.06 \GL=953.421 \ '• ° I\ I - (MATCH. m 1 \ j p EXISTING)' \ I \ I GL=955.28 I \ $3 y rn \ 0\\ \ S v �, \ ° \\\ \ \ •/ 85715 I ili L ``\ `�, tS I / 4 ° I 1, ii1. A\ to \ v to \ \ L pi s I i ° % CBI 4 g6 % . /. a° \I, \ I ,\ \ k (V,' ;�'' 954.35 �„ \ i� v �\ \ i " \ v / w\\ Cl- \ \\ 1 \j\\ RE,952�ag2 DCCEDi I I `,\\ 17 \ 1 CB g2 65 I \ \ \ RE g4a?5 I I I \ \ \ElN g4a 6o I I I \ J J I I \ I I \\ '� If I \------- I v to 0 I / I / I / v I -----------955-------- \ / / IE N ='952.23 dE 946.71 >> JE(�E�-946.18 --� IE(SW228 _ I4NW)- 946.7- 946.18 9 San MH \\ 5 RE=956.18 )) I > - E- 5.6\13 Bus`n5 9� ess u 952.50 » >> ----- v ----- >> » ---------a 36" RCP - - - >> v > San MH - Storm MH 36" RCP RE=957.22 > RE -957 03- IE(NW)=945.17 > N Cs ' IERE=956 08 I- _ _ bb] 16 UUN-C;K�1L UUKb ANU GUTTER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 SEE NOTE 02 957.26 j / \ hh / 1 rn 1 \ I \`��\ I // I\ uI \\\\ \ a I \ \` \ 9M 957.34 \1\ \ I \ 1\ \ 1 T T -BUR T_ RTk GL=`\ I \\ 957.03 a' \ GL= \ 957.34 ;�`;\ ► / -moi`► � \�\ \ 32 \ 1`\\ \ jH I \ G) GL=955.6£ N ------ / / - (MATCH " Storm5-7 40 �/ A / RE g g49gID h 1pos EXISTING) OP o LEGEND D PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PER � C3 PROPOSED TIPOUT CURB PER 3 C3 SILT FENCE PER 2 C3 DRAINAGE ARROW GL= PROPOSED GUTTER LINE ELEVATION 908.55 BIT= PROPOSED BITUMINOUS ELEVATION 908.55 GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO IMPORTING OR EXPORTING MATERIAL FROM THE SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 6002 OR 6003. 2. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ROUGH GRADING. 5 6 3. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES PER C3 AND C3 AT ALL CATCH BASINS THAT MAY RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE. 4. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE PERFORMED DAILY IF SEDIMENT IS TRACKED OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OR ONTO ANY CITY STREETS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES). STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHENEVER ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY SEEDING INFORMATION AND APPLICATION RATES ARE TABULATED ON SHEET C4. 6. SEE SHEET C5 FOR STORM SEWER INFORMATION. 7. SEE SHEET L1 FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN. 8. SEE SHEET C8 FOR THE SANITARY SEWER DUMP STATION AND SIGN LOCATIONS. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 LOCATION AND INVERT OF EXISTING STORM SEWER STUB SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. A MANHOLE MAY BE NECESSARY IF THE ANGLE OF THE PIPE HAS TO BE REVISED. 20 DROP THE BACK OF THE CURB TO ALLOW STORMWATER TO FLOW THROUGH THE CURB. 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 3395.05 DATE REVISION I hereby certify that prepared by me or am a duly Licensed of the State of this plan, specification, or report was under my direct supervision and that I Professional Engineer under the laws ECAMPING Mt. DESIGNED BY: TAE Hakanson A Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson-anderson.com WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C2 of C8 SHEETS 4 7 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW 4/26/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW DRAWN BY: TAE 6 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW 7 7 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW 7 7/1 8 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CHECKED BY: CJJ 8/3/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEWTIMOTHY 3395.05 w Q w 0 Ln 0 Ln / 7) L) 0 T) w Q �n Q/ 00 cn 't~ U N w 0 0 N Q) N 0-) -0 U GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND SOILS NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION". 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE RECOMMENDED IN THESE PLANS, THE GRADING SUBGRADE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL. THE FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN 8" TO 10" LOOSE LIFTS, AND COMPACTED TO 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. 3. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOILS ENCOUNTERED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL, SILT, DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE "REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW" PREPARED BY AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. AND DATED MARCH 2, 2017 FOR ADDITIONAL SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. 5. PROVIDE A SAW CUT WHEN PLACING NEW PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO INPLACE PAVEMENT AND AT TERMINI OF CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE A UNIFORM JOINT. 6. BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE ITEMS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPEC. 2104.3. 7. USE TACK COAT BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS MIXTURES. THE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF 0.05 GAL/SY TO 0.07 GAL/SY BETWEEN BITUMINOUS LAYERS. THE APPLICATION RATES ARE FOR UNDILUTED EMULSIONS. 8. PERFORMANCE GRADED (PG) ASPHALT BINDER PG 58S-28, SPEC. 3151, SHALL BE USED FOR ALL BITUMINOUS MIXES ON THIS PROJECT. SPECIFIC PG GRADES SHALL BE LISTED AT THE END OF THE MIX DESIGNATION NUMBER SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTION. 9. THE BITUMINOUS MIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFICATIONS 2360 AND 3139. 10. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 4" OF TOPSOIL AND SOD. GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MN/DOT EROSION CONTROL HANDBOOK. 2. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACQUIRE THE NECESSARY MPCA NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) PRIOR TO GRADING AND REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. BMP'S SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE HIS OPERATION TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED AREA AT ANY GIVEN TIME. 5. BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR. OBSERVATIONS SHALL BE RECORDED IN THE INSPECTION LOG. 6. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILE A NOTICE OF TERMINATION WITH THE MPCA AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN APPROVED. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 TYPE 1 INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE PONDING OF WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION. 02 TYPE 2 INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL CASTINGS RECEIVING RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT AREA. 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA240B) BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 2" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEB240B) 10" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION PLASTIC ZIP TIES (50LB TENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8" DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW Z Z �w D oM w cV H 0 0 NO SCALE POST LENGTH, 5 FT. MIN. AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" WIDTH MACHINE SLICE 8"-12" DEPTH 8612 CONCRETE CURB 6" AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 D 6.00% i a 899 12" INTAKE B612 CONCRETE CURB 6„� AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 N � C° a 1.a i M a 12” TIPOUT STANDARD MACHINE SLICED 3 C3 2 SILT FENCE DETAILS C3 TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW (SEE SPEC. 3886) 949.75 CONCRETE CURB DETAILS NO SCALE 34.12" LO cV cfl 6.375" 3.63" 17.63" OPEN BOTH SIDES NI o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® o 0 0 0 0 0 --- ® o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 HDPE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3886 2" DIAMETER HOLES T TOP VIEW L SEDIMENT CONTROL AL SLOT FOR LOCKING TAB BARRIER FRAME SIDE VIEW SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER FRAME STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TYPE 1 O f ); DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report wasDESIGNED prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Mi ta. BY: TAECAMPING Hakanson Andersonam Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION D SHEET C3 OF C8 SHEETS 4 7 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW 6 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW DRAWN BY: TAE 7/7/17 REVISED DETAIL 7 C3 7/18/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW IIM01HY A. (ZIIJIIA� Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CHECKED BY: CJJ \ A D A C �RR 35-1/4' 43" OFRAME 945.75 2X3 HDPE FRAME INSERT LEGEND PLAN 952 -- EXISTING CONTOUR CASTING TO BE SET C BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION ON 4 CONCRETE WEIR DETAIL EMERGENCY 952 PROPOSED CONTOUR INSTALL INFRA SHIELD CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V OVERFLOW PROPERTY LINE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL C3 PORTS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LINE 4" MIN 2NGMAX ) G GAS MAIN ENCASE WITH CONCRETE MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48' DIA COLLAR CRETEX TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" P—OH OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 6" OPENING P—BUR BURIED ELECTRIC 6 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TYPE 2 02 T—BUR BURIED TELEPHONE *15" 24" 9' FO—BUR BURIED FIBER OPTIC C3 POST—CURB ------------------------ EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER m CONCRETE CONNDOGCTIOOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER � _� � *48" P >> EXISTING STORM SEWER SEWER *DIMENSION VARIES p MEQ R STRUCTURE EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING UTILITY POLE RCP PIPE a EXISTING UTILITY PEDESTAL � EXISTING LIGHT POLE -6-EXISTING HYDRANT AND CBASE TORETE TBE CH BCARSIEXMANHOLE NOTES: >< EXISTING WAT E R M A I N VALVE TYPE 4336 OR APPROVED EQUAL 1' IN ERT TO OUTLET. EGROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH O EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE ® ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN REQUIRED. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF EXISTING SIGN PRE–� CCAASTING SHALL BEST CONCRETE LNEENAHIN CRR4D,33442E WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006E THE EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING, THE CASTING SHALL BE PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER NEENAH R -3508-A2. >> PROPOSED STORM SEWER SEWER Title: Basin — DETAIL NUMBER Standard Plate LibraryCatch T3--"W—SHEET Manhole NUMBER City of Monticello Dote: Plate No. 03-05 SOIL BORING �� Revlsed:03-17 4003 \ DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report wasDESIGNED prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Mi ta. BY: TAECAMPING Hakanson Andersonam Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION DETAILS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C3 OF C8 SHEETS 4 7 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW 6 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW DRAWN BY: TAE 7/7/17 REVISED DETAIL 7 C3 7/18/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW IIM01HY A. (ZIIJIIA� Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CHECKED BY: CJJ 3395.05 U) Q w 0 Ln O L0 Un O w Q EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL QUANTITIES Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 MN/DOT SPECIFICATION APPLICATION RATE or CA -25 Riprap Bedding SOD TYPE LAWN 3878 Geotextite fabric Original 2700 SQ YD FERTILIZER TYPE 1 grade 300 LBS/ACRE 167 LBS 0 SECTION B—B 2573 N/A (not to scale) SILT FENCE 3886 Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates 1604 LIN FT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE o p Original N/A 1 EACH Geotextile fabric SECTION A—A grade (not to scale) NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trapping device �c Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates I A A o \ B Q o o E C) o o o O w �o of Q A o ~/ 24' min. B Cf)v X 1 / Slope away from w highway i 50' min. Match or Right of Way Existing Grade PLAN Title: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 06-14 6002 -- Revised. 03-15 —15 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL QUANTITIES ITEM MN/DOT SPECIFICATION APPLICATION RATE APPROXIMATE QUANTITY SOD TYPE LAWN 3878 N/A 2700 SQ YD FERTILIZER TYPE 1 3881 300 LBS/ACRE 167 LBS STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 2573 N/A 8 EACH SILT FENCE 3886 N/A 1604 LIN FT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2573 N/A 1 EACH GENERAL NOTES: 1. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL DUMP STATION SEPARATION DISTANCES AND DIMENSIONS AND REVISE AS NEEDED TO MEET ALL CODES. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 SIGN A SHALL BE PART #DUMPSTATIONSIGN AS PROVIDED BY WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, LLC (DBA RVPARKSUPPLIES.COM), VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON OR APPROVED EQUAL. 02 DUMP STATION LID SHALL BE PART #METALDUMPSTATIONLID AS PROVIDED BY WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, LLC (DBA RVPARKSUPPLIES.COM), VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON OR APPROVED EQUAL. 03 CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL DUMP STATION. PATCH BITUMINOUS TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AND GRAVEL BASE SECTIONS. ® CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SUPPLY. EXISTING 12' MIN —.---\-CONST PAVED ROADWAY 50' WMMN TIRV VD OVE12L4P WITY SPILCES .: STAIeES STRAP CONNECTORS CONSTRUCTION MAT END OVERLAP INTERLOCK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS END OVERLAP\ MATS, WOVEN OR TRM DISTURBED AREA, CONSTRUCTION SITE, STABILIZED STORAGE AREA OR STAGING AREA PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: SIDE /OVERLAP Mud Mat Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 06-14 6003 DUCTILE IRON DUMP STATION LID WITH FOOT PEDAL CAST INTO SLAB C roncT 0QOOF DRANT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (3 —SIGN AT ✓ANIZED ITH HOSE T I I 27" DIAMETER MANWAY I I I I 2,000 GALLON PLAN VIEW SEPTIC TANK 8.3% 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC MALE— ADAPTOR (SCREW X SOLVENT SLIP WELD) 6" (3 LAYERS) 4" SCHEDULE 80 4" FERNCO POLYSTYRENE PVC PIPE INSULATION COUPLING 2' MIN. (ALL EDGES) 8.3% 00 It 7" CONCRETE PAD 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC RISER CAST INTO COVER PROFILE VIEW NEENAH R-1733 FRAME WITH SOLID COVER. COVER SHALL HAVE TWO C.I. LIFT HANDLES, 1/4" POLYISOPRENE GASKET AND THE WORDS "SANITARY SEWER". (2) 2" CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS 27" DIA. CONCRETE PIPE RISER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006 DUMP STATION DETAIL 2,000 GALLON PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK REVISION v e e DESIGNED BY: TAE v o e CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION DETAILS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA v e e ADDED SHEET PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW v a e E8/3/117 v e e Date 3/6/17 UTLic. No. 43362 CHECKED BY: CJJ v o e a a e PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: SIDE /OVERLAP Mud Mat Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 06-14 6003 DUCTILE IRON DUMP STATION LID WITH FOOT PEDAL CAST INTO SLAB C roncT 0QOOF DRANT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (3 —SIGN AT ✓ANIZED ITH HOSE T I I 27" DIAMETER MANWAY I I I I 2,000 GALLON PLAN VIEW SEPTIC TANK 8.3% 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC MALE— ADAPTOR (SCREW X SOLVENT SLIP WELD) 6" (3 LAYERS) 4" SCHEDULE 80 4" FERNCO POLYSTYRENE PVC PIPE INSULATION COUPLING 2' MIN. (ALL EDGES) 8.3% 00 It 7" CONCRETE PAD 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC RISER CAST INTO COVER PROFILE VIEW NEENAH R-1733 FRAME WITH SOLID COVER. COVER SHALL HAVE TWO C.I. LIFT HANDLES, 1/4" POLYISOPRENE GASKET AND THE WORDS "SANITARY SEWER". (2) 2" CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS 27" DIA. CONCRETE PIPE RISER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006 DUMP STATION DETAIL 2,000 GALLON PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws ta. of the State of M��_Er 11-0 DESIGNED BY: TAE Hakanson Andersonam Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION DETAILS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C4 OF C8 SHEETS ADDED SHEET PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW DRAWN BY: TAE E8/3/117 Date 3/6/17 UTLic. No. 43362 CHECKED BY: CJJ 3395.05 U w w O cn J Q w 0 Ln 0 LO / Ln 0 LO M ro / w Q / N w 0 ADS 315ST WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER FOUNDATION STONE FOR SCOUR PROTECTION 24" CPP HEADER ROW WITH 10" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (7 TOTAL STUBS) GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONS PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 AND 4022. STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 4003. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 PLACE GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC ON THE TOP AND ON ALL SIDES OF THE ANGULAR STONE. DO NOT PLACE FABRIC UNDER THE ANGULAR STONE. �2 SEE SHEETS C5 AND C6 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS FOR THE STORMTECH CHAMBER. 03 STRUCTURE SHALL INCLUDE A 6" CONCRETE WEIR PER 4' CLEAN, CRUSHED, - ANGULAR STONE (2 12" STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) 51" (TYP.) APPROVED SUBGRADE CHAMBERS PLACED 57" ON CENTER (6" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) EDGE OF INFILTRATION AREA — — T__ — — — STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON–WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 274.2' ADS 315ST WOVEN 18" CPP HEADER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER 10" INSPECTION 2 52' ROW WITH 8" CPP FOUNDATION STONE FOR PORT PER(_3'C5 STUBS TO CHAMBERS SCOUR PROTECTION (TYP.) C5 (14 TOTAL STUBS) u u e L• LE 20 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET PARKING LOT SECTION VARIES CHAMBERS PLACED 69" ON CENTER (18" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) CHAMBER SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 02 —952.75 '952.25 949.75 —949.00 12" STORMTECH— SC-740 END CAP (TYP.) CHAMBER SYSTEM PLAN VIEW 02 18" RCP OUTLET PIPE CONCRETE COLLAR PAVEMENT CONCRETE SLAB 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS FLEXSTORM CATCH IT PART# 6215NYFX WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 10" (250 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 1OP35STIF INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTEREE ON CORRUGATION CREST a 01 u n EN n n x J STM/MH #4 48" DIA. (R-1733) RIM=955.73 (N)INV=949.75 (S)INV=950.22 24" CPP HEADER ROW WITH 10" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (7 TOTAL STUBS) CB/MH #5 (3 60" DIA. (R -3360–A) RIM=954.38 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP 0 14, RIM 19 Ed 9 VAN MIN 0, 1, 17 .. .-ROM MANHOLE TO CHAMBER CB/MH #7 (R–3360–A) .,. .75 SUk11P=945.75 ►TH CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 15" (375 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE PART# 2715AG 101 P SOLID COVER: 1599CGC GRATE: 1599CGS 10" (250 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER SC -740 10" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report wasDESIGNED prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws ta. of the State of M_�� BY: TAE Hakanson A Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors y 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION ROM CNIA SHEET C5 OF C8 SHEETS 6415417 ADDED SHEET IN NA 111 DRAWN BY: TAE lIMUIHT A. 1131015 Date 3/6/17 UT Lic. No. 43362 ME —► im,r"•:►:•:mevsimm ■ /,ilk �• • • . ► 1 _._._._._ ► ._._._. �--■ .►��������� 04 10 E4 r4A I IN NA 40 C, • 10. • • • .•A,• •A,. GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONS PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 AND 4022. STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 4003. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 PLACE GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC ON THE TOP AND ON ALL SIDES OF THE ANGULAR STONE. DO NOT PLACE FABRIC UNDER THE ANGULAR STONE. �2 SEE SHEETS C5 AND C6 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS FOR THE STORMTECH CHAMBER. 03 STRUCTURE SHALL INCLUDE A 6" CONCRETE WEIR PER 4' CLEAN, CRUSHED, - ANGULAR STONE (2 12" STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) 51" (TYP.) APPROVED SUBGRADE CHAMBERS PLACED 57" ON CENTER (6" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) EDGE OF INFILTRATION AREA — — T__ — — — STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON–WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 274.2' ADS 315ST WOVEN 18" CPP HEADER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER 10" INSPECTION 2 52' ROW WITH 8" CPP FOUNDATION STONE FOR PORT PER(_3'C5 STUBS TO CHAMBERS SCOUR PROTECTION (TYP.) C5 (14 TOTAL STUBS) u u e L• LE 20 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET PARKING LOT SECTION VARIES CHAMBERS PLACED 69" ON CENTER (18" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) CHAMBER SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 02 —952.75 '952.25 949.75 —949.00 12" STORMTECH— SC-740 END CAP (TYP.) CHAMBER SYSTEM PLAN VIEW 02 18" RCP OUTLET PIPE CONCRETE COLLAR PAVEMENT CONCRETE SLAB 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS FLEXSTORM CATCH IT PART# 6215NYFX WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 10" (250 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 1OP35STIF INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTEREE ON CORRUGATION CREST a 01 u n EN n n x J STM/MH #4 48" DIA. (R-1733) RIM=955.73 (N)INV=949.75 (S)INV=950.22 24" CPP HEADER ROW WITH 10" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (7 TOTAL STUBS) CB/MH #5 (3 60" DIA. (R -3360–A) RIM=954.38 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP 0 14, RIM 19 Ed 9 VAN MIN 0, 1, 17 .. .-ROM MANHOLE TO CHAMBER CB/MH #7 (R–3360–A) .,. .75 SUk11P=945.75 ►TH CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 15" (375 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE PART# 2715AG 101 P SOLID COVER: 1599CGC GRATE: 1599CGS 10" (250 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER SC -740 10" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report wasDESIGNED prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws ta. of the State of M_�� BY: TAE Hakanson A Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors y 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER SYSTEM DETAILS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C5 OF C8 SHEETS 6415417 ADDED SHEET 7/18/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW DRAWN BY: TAE lIMUIHT A. 1131015 Date 3/6/17 UT Lic. No. 43362 CHECKED BY: CJJ 3395.05 ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER SYSTEMS PLEASE NOTE: 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR #4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR NO. 4 (AASHTO M43) STONE". 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR'A' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6" (150 mm) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS PERIMETER STONE (SEE NOTE 6) EXCAVATION WALL (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) 12" (300 mm) MIN \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\ \\\ \\ \\ SC -740 END CAP SUBGRADE SOILS (SEE NOTE 4) PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) \ *TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVED INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY OCCUR, INCREASE COVER TO 24" (600 mm). (150 mm) MIN NOTES: 1. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS", OR ASTM F2922 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYETHYLENE (PE) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 3. "ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS" TABLE ABOVE PROVIDES MATERIAL LOCATIONS, DESCRIPTIONS, GRADATIONS, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FOUNDATION, EMBEDMENT, AND FILL MATERIALS. 4. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 5. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 6. ONCE LAYER 'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER 'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER'C' OR'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. R„ rl �n mm� nnini 30" (760 mm) (450 mm) MIN* 8 (2.4 m) MAX DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mm) MIN 12" (300 mm) TYP 0 ti 1 U W O co 0 w 0 > 0 Z O U W �U) V �JJ V ) O U 0 Q 0 Z Q U) :, 00 Lu 0 Lm 0 6 E: ui 2i w U) w 0 a z 0 0 LU U z a 0 a r 0, CD U C) = U w U 2 J O U 3: O cy) � Lu coN � N in rn 000 < .0 O o0 0 00 O O 00 3: rn z_ 0 0 00 SHEET Z O U W z O U O O a_ 0 z Q 0 LO Lu Lu J J Q U) W W z c -q � zz ww zw (D Q� U)D Lu C) 0 W w� Uw wLu =O wo >z �< ZZ LU Uo w� 0�J a-LLJ _J cD �w U Lu(n) °< r W W J 2 in � Q OU �a OQ � J W J W < Z_ U W Z W wg Z c� (� J ww0 �0 o U)� W Q U �O Ov Z< OJ J U W Z 0 � 0 < W 0 W 2 � � U � a ww O 0 z .-. DU) 0 U <S 00 0a wW 0= o'~ 0�< wQ z� Ow Q� �co �Z LU LL 00 z� z� oW Lu 0z Lu (D <Z LU Ca oz Lu CD aw a-C)ww a_F_ zcf) ww Lu= m� <LL0 (D Z J m Qcl) ry, Z 00 ct)a -U) �ry C6 OF C8 AASHTO MATERIAL COMPACTION /DENSITY MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLASSIFICATIONS SS CATI N O S REQUIREMENT FINAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'D' STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE 'C' LAYER TO THE BOTTOM ANY SOIL/ROCK MATERIALS, NATIVE SOILS, OR PER PREPARE PER SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S PLANS. D OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR UNPAVED FINISHED ENGINEER'S PLANS. CHECK PLANS FOR PAVEMENT N/A PAVED INSTALLATIONS MAY HAVE STRINGENT GRADE ABOVE. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS. MATERIAL AND PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. MAY BE PART OF THE 'D' LAYER BEGIN COMPACTIONS AFTER 12" (300 mm) OF AASHTO M145' MATERIAL OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REACHED. INITIAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'C' GRANULAR WELL -GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES, <35% A-1, A-24, A-3 COMPACT ADDITIONAL LAYERS IN 6" (150 mm) MAX STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE EMBEDMENT FINES OR PROCESSED AGGREGATE. LIFTS TO A MIN. 95% PROCTOR DENSITY FOR C STONE (, B LAYER) TO 18, (450 mm) ABOVE THE OR WELL GRADED MATERIAL AND 95% RELATIVE TOP OF THE CHAMBER. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE MATERIALS CAN BE USED IN LIEU AASHTO M43' DENSITY FOR PROCESSED AGGREGATE SUBBASE MAY BE A PART OF THE 'C' LAYER. OF THIS LAYER. 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57, 6, 67, 68, 7, 78, 8, 89, MATERIALS. ROLLER GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT 9,10 NOT TO EXCEED 12,000 lbs (53 kN). DYNAMIC FORCE NOT TO EXCEED 20,000 lbs (89 kN). EMBEDMENT STONE: FILL SURROUNDING THE AASHTO M43' B CHAMBERS FROM THE FOUNDATION STONE ('A' CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE NO COMPACTION REQUIRED. LAYER) TO THE 'C' LAYER ABOVE. 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 FOUNDATION STONE: FILL BELOW CHAMBERS AASHTO M43' PLATE COMPACT OR ROLL TO ACHIEVE A FLAT A FROM THE SUBGRADE UP TO THE FOOT (BOTTOM) CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 SURFACE. 2 3 OF THE CHAMBER. PLEASE NOTE: 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR #4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR NO. 4 (AASHTO M43) STONE". 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR'A' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6" (150 mm) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS PERIMETER STONE (SEE NOTE 6) EXCAVATION WALL (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) 12" (300 mm) MIN \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\ \\\ \\ \\ SC -740 END CAP SUBGRADE SOILS (SEE NOTE 4) PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) \ *TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVED INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY OCCUR, INCREASE COVER TO 24" (600 mm). (150 mm) MIN NOTES: 1. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS", OR ASTM F2922 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYETHYLENE (PE) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 3. "ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS" TABLE ABOVE PROVIDES MATERIAL LOCATIONS, DESCRIPTIONS, GRADATIONS, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FOUNDATION, EMBEDMENT, AND FILL MATERIALS. 4. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 5. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 6. ONCE LAYER 'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER 'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER'C' OR'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. R„ rl �n mm� nnini 30" (760 mm) (450 mm) MIN* 8 (2.4 m) MAX DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mm) MIN 12" (300 mm) TYP 0 ti 1 U W O co 0 w 0 > 0 Z O U W �U) V �JJ V ) O U 0 Q 0 Z Q U) :, 00 Lu 0 Lm 0 6 E: ui 2i w U) w 0 a z 0 0 LU U z a 0 a r 0, CD U C) = U w U 2 J O U 3: O cy) � Lu coN � N in rn 000 < .0 O o0 0 00 O O 00 3: rn z_ 0 0 00 SHEET Z O U W z O U O O a_ 0 z Q 0 LO Lu Lu J J Q U) W W z c -q � zz ww zw (D Q� U)D Lu C) 0 W w� Uw wLu =O wo >z �< ZZ LU Uo w� 0�J a-LLJ _J cD �w U Lu(n) °< r W W J 2 in � Q OU �a OQ � J W J W < Z_ U W Z W wg Z c� (� J ww0 �0 o U)� W Q U �O Ov Z< OJ J U W Z 0 � 0 < W 0 W 2 � � U � a ww O 0 z .-. DU) 0 U <S 00 0a wW 0= o'~ 0�< wQ z� Ow Q� �co �Z LU LL 00 z� z� oW Lu 0z Lu (D <Z LU Ca oz Lu CD aw a-C)ww a_F_ zcf) ww Lu= m� <LL0 (D Z J m Qcl) ry, Z 00 ct)a -U) �ry C6 OF C8 COVER ENTIRE ISOLATOR ROW WITH ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE 8'(2.4 m) MIN WIDE STORMTECH HIGHLY RECOMMENDS FLEXSTORM PURE INSERTS IN ANY UPSTREAM STRUCTURES WITH OPEN GRATES CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLE SUMP DEPTH TBD BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER (24" [600 mm] MIN RECOMMENDED) INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE STEP 1) INSPECT ISOLATOR ROW FOR SEDIMENT SC -740 CHAMBER 24" 24" (600 mm) HDPE ACCESS PIPE REQUIRED USE FACTORY PRE -FABRICATED END CAP PART #: SC740EPE24B SC -740 ISOLATOR ROW DETAIL NTS A. INSPECTION PORTS (IF PRESENT) A.1. REMOVE/OPEN LID ON NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN A.2. REMOVE AND CLEAN FLEXSTORM FILTER IF INSTALLED A.3. USING A FLASHLIGHT AND STADIA ROD, MEASURE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT AND RECORD ON MAINTENANCE LOG A.4. LOWER A CAMERA INTO ISOLATOR ROW FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT LEVELS (OPTIONAL) A.5. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. B. ALL ISOLATOR ROWS B.1. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF ISOLATOR ROW B.2. USING A FLASHLIGHT, INSPECT DOWN THE ISOLATOR ROW THROUGH OUTLET PIPE i) MIRRORS ON POLES OR CAMERAS MAY BE USED TO AVOID A CONFINED SPACE ENTRY ii) FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY IF ENTERING MANHOLE B.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. STEP 2) CLEAN OUT ISOLATOR ROW USING THE JETVAC PROCESS A. A FIXED CULVERT CLEANING NOZZLE WITH REAR FACING SPREAD OF 45" (1.1 m) OR MORE IS PREFERRED B. APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC UNTIL BACKFLUSH WATER IS CLEAN C. VACUUM STRUCTURE SUMP AS REQUIRED STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS, GRATES, FILTERS, AND LIDS; RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIONS. STEP 4) INSPECT AND CLEAN BASINS AND MANHOLES UPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. NOTES 1. INSPECT EVERY 6 MONTHS DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. ADJUST THE INSPECTION INTERVAL BASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS. 2. CONDUCT JETTING AND VACTORING ANNUALLY OR WHEN INSPECTION SHOWS THAT MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY. CONCRETE COLLAR PAVEMENT CONCRETE SLAB 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS FLEXSTORM CATCH 11 PART# 6212NYF>� WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 6" (150 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 6P26FBSTIP INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTEREE ON CORRUGATION CREST OPTIONAL INSPECTION PORT // I I_� \\ 7/ 7/ \�//\\ \�//\\ 7/ 7/ \�//\\ 7/ 7/ \�//\\ \�// SC -740 END CAP TWO LAYERS OF ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 315WTK WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN FOUNDATION STONE AND CHAMBERS 5'(1.5 m) MIN WIDE CONTINUOUS FABRIC WITHOUT SEAMS ►TH CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 12" (300 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE PART# 2712AG61 P* SOLID COVER: 1299CGC* GRATE: 1299CGS 6" (150 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER * THE PART# 2712AG61PKIT CAN BE USED TO ORDER ALL NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR A SOLID LID INSPECTION PORT INSTALLATION SC -740 6" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL NTS O ti U U) z O U co w 0 V U W 1 00 O C`7 O Lu U Lu O Lm 0 J N mC) co Z ":I- co <_Nt w0ti D coco Q O J O O J_ pp � 2 z ui 2i w co coU) Lu Q z a 0 0 LU U z Q > 0 a N � N oco Q co 0 00 co o 0 0op z CL'o, 0 co co SHEET z 0 U co z 0 U 0 0 _ C� Z_ O Lo _ W_ Lu J J Q _ ry W W zC/) �z zw w:�i zw 0Q� �55 wp 0w wry U) U ww =0 Io wo >—z <Q zZ wz co w� 0�J _D UJ c� �w U � Lu C6 °Q rw W J 2 m � Q OU �a oQ r J W J W Q U'W ZW Lu 2i zco (� J WW 00 Lu W Q � U �o ov zQ OJ I—J U Q wo !?� Z 00 LU Uj � U �a ww 00 z OU Qo 00 oa ww o= o'~ 0�< _Q z� ow Q=) 2 c �z w 00 z� z� Ow Lu oz w� wz Qw m z 00 Qw _o ww 0� �_ zcn ww Lu= m� QO Z J m Qcl) ry, Z 00 U)a U) =w a I,,� �I I,,,,,,,� b I I,� b I I,� b I I I I,� /�I I,� /�I I,� /�I I,� /�I I,� /�I I,� //\\\//\\\//\\\�//\\\�//\\\�//\\\�//\\\�//\\//\\\//\\\�//\\\�//\\\�//\\\�// \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ // I1, //1 � I /o//o/I�I�/o/� /o,/o,/o,/o,/o,/o,/� /o/o/o/o/o/o/o/ ////\I�,�/� \/I�,� / /� /o/o/o\ / \I/��� -//Il � I; -I I;-I�I I 1I I I; -I I; -I I;-oI I; -I I; -I I; -I I /\/\/\/\"/\\�,�/\\�//\\�// /\\//\\//\\///\/ / / - \\ / / /I�/�/�/�/ /\/\/\/\/�/�/�/ \/\\/\\// \\ \ / ,�� ,�� ,� %\11 2-- 24" 24" (600 mm) HDPE ACCESS PIPE REQUIRED USE FACTORY PRE -FABRICATED END CAP PART #: SC740EPE24B SC -740 ISOLATOR ROW DETAIL NTS A. INSPECTION PORTS (IF PRESENT) A.1. REMOVE/OPEN LID ON NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN A.2. REMOVE AND CLEAN FLEXSTORM FILTER IF INSTALLED A.3. USING A FLASHLIGHT AND STADIA ROD, MEASURE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT AND RECORD ON MAINTENANCE LOG A.4. LOWER A CAMERA INTO ISOLATOR ROW FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT LEVELS (OPTIONAL) A.5. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. B. ALL ISOLATOR ROWS B.1. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF ISOLATOR ROW B.2. USING A FLASHLIGHT, INSPECT DOWN THE ISOLATOR ROW THROUGH OUTLET PIPE i) MIRRORS ON POLES OR CAMERAS MAY BE USED TO AVOID A CONFINED SPACE ENTRY ii) FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY IF ENTERING MANHOLE B.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. STEP 2) CLEAN OUT ISOLATOR ROW USING THE JETVAC PROCESS A. A FIXED CULVERT CLEANING NOZZLE WITH REAR FACING SPREAD OF 45" (1.1 m) OR MORE IS PREFERRED B. APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC UNTIL BACKFLUSH WATER IS CLEAN C. VACUUM STRUCTURE SUMP AS REQUIRED STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS, GRATES, FILTERS, AND LIDS; RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIONS. STEP 4) INSPECT AND CLEAN BASINS AND MANHOLES UPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. NOTES 1. INSPECT EVERY 6 MONTHS DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. ADJUST THE INSPECTION INTERVAL BASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS. 2. CONDUCT JETTING AND VACTORING ANNUALLY OR WHEN INSPECTION SHOWS THAT MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY. CONCRETE COLLAR PAVEMENT CONCRETE SLAB 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS FLEXSTORM CATCH 11 PART# 6212NYF>� WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 6" (150 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 6P26FBSTIP INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTEREE ON CORRUGATION CREST OPTIONAL INSPECTION PORT // I I_� \\ 7/ 7/ \�//\\ \�//\\ 7/ 7/ \�//\\ 7/ 7/ \�//\\ \�// SC -740 END CAP TWO LAYERS OF ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 315WTK WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN FOUNDATION STONE AND CHAMBERS 5'(1.5 m) MIN WIDE CONTINUOUS FABRIC WITHOUT SEAMS ►TH CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 12" (300 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE PART# 2712AG61 P* SOLID COVER: 1299CGC* GRATE: 1299CGS 6" (150 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER * THE PART# 2712AG61PKIT CAN BE USED TO ORDER ALL NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR A SOLID LID INSPECTION PORT INSTALLATION SC -740 6" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL NTS O ti U U) z O U co w 0 V U W 1 00 O C`7 O Lu U Lu O Lm 0 J N mC) co Z ":I- co <_Nt w0ti D coco Q O J O O J_ pp � 2 z ui 2i w co coU) Lu Q z a 0 0 LU U z Q > 0 a N � N oco Q co 0 00 co o 0 0op z CL'o, 0 co co SHEET z 0 U co z 0 U 0 0 _ C� Z_ O Lo _ W_ Lu J J Q _ ry W W zC/) �z zw w:�i zw 0Q� �55 wp 0w wry U) U ww =0 Io wo >—z <Q zZ wz co w� 0�J _D UJ c� �w U � Lu C6 °Q rw W J 2 m � Q OU �a oQ r J W J W Q U'W ZW Lu 2i zco (� J WW 00 Lu W Q � U �o ov zQ OJ I—J U Q wo !?� Z 00 LU Uj � U �a ww 00 z OU Qo 00 oa ww o= o'~ 0�< _Q z� ow Q=) 2 c �z w 00 z� z� Ow Lu oz w� wz Qw m z 00 Qw _o ww 0� �_ zcn ww Lu= m� QO Z J m Qcl) ry, Z 00 U)a U) =w U) z Q w I w Cn LO 0 LO Ln O Ln w Q Q/ 00 Un N � U III O CI - o / N 0-0 0 C7) U Q .. J Ifii M \ \ \ REFERENCE NOTES: 10 SEE SHEET C4 FOR ADDITIONAL DUMP STATION DETAILS. FINAL LOCATION OF DUMP STATION SHALL BE VERIFIED BY OWNER. �2 CONSTRUCT 4" STEEL BOLLARDS IN 12" DIAMETER \\ CONCRETE FOOTINGS AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT DUMP STATION LID AND YARD HYDRANT. EPDXY 15' MIN. COAT STEEL BOLLARD (SAFETY YELLOW). 2,000 GALLON \ \ \ DUMP STATION #1 0O 'V7 \ \ 4 Existing Building 3801 Chelsea Rd. W PROPOSED PYLON SIGN W11 RL[VI %J V EXISTING FLAG POLE 15' MIN. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 30' MIN. (49' SHOWN) \ \ \ C \ CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION HA I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the lawsMEMEN of the State =M'ta. ETAE r f-0 DESIGNED BY: TAE Hakanson A Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION SITE PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C8 of C8 SHEETS / 8/3/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW DRAWN BY: 30' MIN. (49' SHOWN) \ \ \ C \ CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION HA 50 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 30' MIN. PROPOSED FLAG POLE 2,000 GALLON DUMP STATION #2 10 DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the lawsMEMEN of the State =M'ta. ETAE r f-0 DESIGNED BY: TAE Hakanson A Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION SITE PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C8 of C8 SHEETS / 8/3/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW DRAWN BY: Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 - / -- 50 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 30' MIN. PROPOSED FLAG POLE 2,000 GALLON DUMP STATION #2 10 DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the lawsMEMEN of the State =M'ta. ETAE r f-0 DESIGNED BY: TAE Hakanson A Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION SITE PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C8 of C8 SHEETS - 8/3/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW DRAWN BY: Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 - 50 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 30' MIN. PROPOSED FLAG POLE 2,000 GALLON DUMP STATION #2 10 DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the lawsMEMEN of the State =M'ta. ETAE r f-0 DESIGNED BY: TAE Hakanson A Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION SITE PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C8 of C8 SHEETS 7 1 8 1 7 ADDED SHEET 8/3/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW DRAWN BY: Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CHECKED BY: CJJ 3395.05 w n Q U U) 0 z Q J Ln O LO LO O LO W Q E n W Q/ Ln M N [-- W I D O O / N � Q) 0-0 0 0-) U Q .. 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET DATE I REVISION 873-717 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of M�r e.seta. �1 Date Lic. No. 43362 DESIGNED BY: TAE DRAWN BY: TAE CHECKED BY: CJJ END FENCE AT EXISTING FENCE BLACK CHAINLINK FENCE Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET L1 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA OF L1 SHEETS 3395.05 z g C) Fy w 0 I- 0 0_ I 0 0 w U Q) F- 0 o+ o EQ 0-0 n N 0 • o �0 CAMPING WORLD SITE LIGHTING MONTICELLO, MN 0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-� 0.0 \ b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o $.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o $.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0\�-o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0\ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 (1. 0.1 0.2 0. ' 3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ` 0\0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 `0.2 `0.4 00../ / 1.0 � \ 0.7 `0.7 `0.5 0.2 0.1 `0.1 `0.1 `0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0. 0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 . 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0.2 0.9 1. 4 4.9 3.1 4.1 O. 3. 2.3 1.2 `0.5 `0.2 `0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 09 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0.2 1.0 2 1 29. 11.5 4.8 8. '2 .3 1.4 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EXISTIN/G� A IS NG \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0.2 0.7 2/. 2 .6 5 0 i2. `G.8 7. '2 .8 6.3 il.s 29. .2 1.1 0.4 `0.2 `0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 9,4 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 `0.2 1.0 2. ,9 / 44.2 `3.9 .7 `3.3 7.9 8.5 1 .6 6.4 26.7 ' .8 49.4 \ \ 24,y 1.7 1.2 `0.5 `0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0\'0. 00 ` .0 �Q.O '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 ,� / EXISTING y' \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.1 .1 0.2 0.9 2. /2 41.1 27.9 17.9 `4.1 9.8 8.1 7.1 8.4 10.1 12.7 32.9 72.6 58.9 ' 'b\5 6. `2.6 1.0 `0.4 0.2CH0.1 AIN LINK 0.1 `0.1 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 ' .0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 \ `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 EXIS ING A \RIGHT NF XISTIN WAY FENCE , \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 .1 0 `0.2 0.7 i p 93. 60.7 16.7 ` 0.7 8.2 6.9 4.0 3.7 5.0 6.6 6.7 9.5 15.0 16.6 23.4 26.5 58.6 7 '�:0 4. 1.8 1 0.6 0.2 `0.1 `0.1 0.1 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 .1 0 0.2 1.0 2 �8 3 4 58. 23. `3.9 8.1 6.2 3.4 1.8 1.5 2.1 3.2 5.1 7.1 9.4 10.5 1 .3 13.0 31.8 61.8 41.7 24.0 ' ` .8 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Co�00 0.0 0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0\�0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 EXISTING '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 '0.1 .1 b 0.2 1.0 3 2 3.0 .8 1 6 `3.9 9.6 7.0 .5 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.3 '2.2 3.8 G.0 7.2 '7. 0.0 13.8 14.2 18.0 26.9 67.5 .0 .1 1.7 1.0 '0.4 `0.2 `0.1 '0.1 '0.1 '0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0`0.0 `0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0----&.o `0.0 '0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 EXIST �G � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 .1 0 `0.3 0.7 2 104 60.2 `6.5 0.0 7.8 6.9 3.6 .8 0.7 0.5 0.4 `0.5 0.8 1.3 2.1 3.2 3 .9 ' 1 9.8 12.6 30.1 50.3 33.9 31.7 .5 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 / EXIS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 .1 0.2 i.l 2. / 40. 53.3 20.9 `3.7 8.0 '6.1 3.6 i.8 .8 0.5 0.9 0. 0 5 .8 i.5 3.0 4.1 3.0 ' 7 i2.7 i2.1 i5.0 29.1 79.0 89.6 30.`2.8 1.3 0.6 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.08 -.II 0.0 \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 .1 `0.2 1.0 3 / 5 6 26. 15. ` 3.9 10.2 7.5 3.8 1.7 0 8 .5 0.4 0. 0 5 .8 2.0 4.6 i . 9 1 9.6 13.6 19.3 30.6 26.5 43.4 6 9 1.8 1.2 `0.6 `0.2 `0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EXISTI AC EXISTING '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.1 '0.1 '0.1 .1 0.2 0.7 i.9/ / .3 2 1 `1.9 9.7 `9.0 5.3 3.1 1.4 0 8 .5 0.4 0.4 0. ' 5 0.7 1.6 4.7 15. 6. 9.3 11.2 12.5 12.0 27.0 63.4 '55.9 `28 23.4 i.9 `0.6 '0.2 `0.1 '0.1 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 `0.0 XISTIN \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 `.2 0.2 1.0 l9 30.9 49.9 .5 4.3 10.1 9.9 7.3 5.2 2.8 1.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 0. .5 0.8 1.0 1.9 1.3 ° 3.8 °5� ` 7 9.0 i3.4 i5. i8.9 ` .4 49.7 5 . 10.3\i. 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.1 `0.1 0.2 `0.4 `0.9 2 / 56.2 26.9 15.2 ` 3.3 10.3 9.3 8.4 8. .8 4.1 1.8 1.1 0.9 `0.8 `0.7 0 ' .5 0.6 0.7 `0.4 8.6 9.4 9.8 `2.0 17.9 .6 36.2 1�.6 i5. i.l 0.3 ' .1 `0.1 `0.1 `0.0 `0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 `0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' EXI I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 `0.1 0.2 ' .2 `0.5 `0.8 / 3. 66. 18.3 ` 0.7 7.8 8.0 8.6 15.6 32 7 ' 6.2 8.9 3.6 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.2 0.7 0. `0. o P ' .6 6.2 6.4 9.2 1 .5 7.5 16.9 22.1 17.Q 1.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 / 2 MAC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 ' .3 0.9 0.7 i .6 4 9 21. `3.4 8.7 6.6 5.2 7.7 22. .0 8.6 12.1 4.5 3. ' .2 4.1 3.0 i.7 i.l 0.8 0.8 i.2 i.8 2.9 0.� i.9 / 4.1 7.3 i1.8 i5.4 29.9 59.8 18 6 2.9 29.9 '0.4 `0.3 '0 .2 0.1 O.i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 / EXISTING C ( Y� CHAIN ,PLpINK 0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.1 0.5 `0.9 S.7 ' .9 .9 ` 1.2 8.9 7.3 4.2 3.4 7.1 20. 4 .4 12.3 5.0 5. ' .2 7. 5.1 2.4 1.3 1. 1.2 2.0 3.5 9.0 6. EXISTING 0.1 ° Oa `0.3 0.7 1.8 8.8 13.7 28.6 83 127 2 3.1 3.3 1. ' .6 ' 5.0 0.3 0.2 ll.lL-1C6 1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 OW, TF�N�E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AC 2 EnL MAC 0.0 0.0 0.0 ` .1 `0.2 0.8 2 / / 4.9 6.0 6.4 .7 5.8 6.4 4.3 3.1 2.6 3.8 8. i .7 2.0 6.5 5.3 10.0 ' 6.1 26.9 10.8 4.7 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.7 s 81ST1N. 0.1 ° 0 1 0.2 0.9 i.0 2.8 'G.6 i0.7 21.4 50.6 �`19 0 3. ' .7 2.9 4.9 3.5 lE]OF 7, i.8 0.9 %9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BUILDING US ` MAC PROPERTY LINE 0.0 0.0 ` .0 0.1 0.2 i3. i0. i0.2 .l 6.3 5.6 5.1 4.0 3.5 3.7 3.9 5.1 5 5 .5 4.2 5.7 i .9 6. �1 i7 2• 6.2,• .5 4. .7 5.2 4.2 7. ' .1 ° .1 0.9 0. ` .8 2.2 4.8 6.9 il.l `22.8 12 7 8.2 i0.5 23.7 A i1.2 3. i.s 2.2 4.9 L 3.8 i.9 0.2 0.2 Mi.AC' 0 1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ 3801 Chelsea Rd. W. I 2 I M.AC 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.7 .9 49. 5.2 i0.2 6.0 7:3 7. �0- `G.r2-`4.-9- 4.a 3f 'S. ' .2 45 7.9 `G.3 3.2 i3.5 'S.5 3. ' 0 0.9 0� 0.7 0.9 `2.1 4.9 `G.5 i1.2 `23.4 23 9 i6.0 i9.0 31.0 72.6 'G5.7 27.9 9.5 8.0 11.5 A5.1 3.3 i.8 1.9 0.7 0.5 X0.6 0.1 0.1 TrtT_ 0.1 `0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1/ 0.5 2.9 1 .2 32.1 11.7 8.0 9.5 13.8 27. 2 3 6.9 4.3 2.7 2.2 2.6 3. ' 9 5.0 i5.6 i0. 7. 7. .76 36.9 7.7 ° a`9 1. i.8 1.0 2.1 4.9 `6.9 19.2 49 39.3 12.6 15.0 8.0 19.1 13.1 9.5 i9.1 59.6 i05 59.0 i5.p oEa 5.0 2.7 2.8 2.5 i0.2 0.3 0.2 O.1MA1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 / ° G, E BITUMIN QS 2 ` '0.0 b.0 0,.0 0.0/ 0.1 0.2 i.2 5.1 33.1 27.6 9.7 6.8 '12.7 72. 6 .4 7.3 9.9 2.7 2.6 2.7 3.4 5.3 'G.7 'G.8 'G.7 'G. ' 4 6.� 34.2 36.6 7.9 4.8 .6 a° 3'8 ° i9.9 39. 8 ° 3 7 `2.8 `0.8 `0.9 1.9 6.3 13.3 37. 42 2 `29.4 10.7 11.5 11.9 10.1 'G.3 11.9 27.6 40.4 32.1 17.3 20.7 47.9 � 23.7 ' 2.5 2.5 3.6 2.1 2.1 8�p.4 '0.7- '0.2 0.1 o.1 ' 0 POSOlb FLAFRLE / \ EXISTING a \ - 2 0.0 0�0\ 0.0� 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 i. 4.1 `9.7 `G.7 6.1 14.4 51.2 9 .6 0.6 10.3 4.9 3. .3 4.0 4.5 5.3 'S.7 5.0 4.7 ' .8 3.q *13.0 *13.3 'S.9 3.7 .3 4.0° 8.6 9.1 \ 0'1 i.3 r i.9C.J 1.6 `0.8 `0.8 i.8 3.7 5.2 8.5 18.6 `7 9 '15.2 8.7 8.2 8.9 6.9 5.0 5.9 i0.3 i6.7 '16.1 9.9 15.4 40.5 71.6 45.4 19.2 12.2 20.2 6.8 5.0 2.6 1.7 3.6 2. ' .1 2 `2.2 `0.1 '0.0 '0.0 00 O.POO `0.\`0.0 `0.1 `0.1 0.2 0.5 4.8 7.2 12.9 24.0 63.9 5.3 8.7 ' 6 5.2 5. .2 9.6 8.5 6.1 4.5 3.4 2.7 .7 4.4 4.4 2.5 .6 ° 'T.3 ° 3.7° `.9M °r i`.5 1.7 1.1 1.0. 1. 3.9 5.6 9.2 22.8 1'24 18.9 7.4 5.9 4.8 3.5 3.6 .7 12.4 22.1 `23.6 i5.7 8.9 i0.0 i5.4 i9.2 il.l i7.7 48.3 81.1 53.0 `21.8 10.9 1 i1.7 .2 2.5 .2 `0.5 0.�lANI G 4 J Q 0.0� \ \� 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 i.l 4.5 '13.3 '13.2 i7.9 S i .9 10.9 6.9 6.0 5 1.8 28.8 33. 15 '.3 4.9 3.5 '2.1 i.9 .2 '2.0 i.7 i.6 '2.2 .2 a3.6 2.9 ^+e2 ° 3.8 `2.7 i.6 1.2 i 2.0 4 6.Ov i1.0 41. ' E+ 36.1 8.6 'S.5 4.0 `2.1 `2.2 .3 i6.4 49. 5},6 `22.1 9.7 7.5 9.0 9.5 8.2 7.1 ' 4 i8.5 27.5 27.1 i5.2 i5.9 40.9 1 55.2 i0.9 0.5 0.1 0.0 `0.0 '0.0 0.0 b.Q\ ` .0 0.1 0.1 0.1 b.3 0 5. 35.6 31.5 18.6 13.3 1 7.0 5.1 4. 9 6 8.9 69.3 69. 41 0 ' .3 5.1 3.5 2.8 '2.6 3.1 1.8 1.2 1.9 2.6 .7 10.7 ' . 11.0 9.5 4.1 3.1 2.6 `2.5 `2.6 ` .9 4.5 `G.0 11.3 34.9 ' 3 30.6 7.9 5.1 3.5 i.8 1.8 .6 14.3 48. 52.59 `20.1 7. 5.0 5.5 6.1 5.6 5.9 9.6 15.5 17.7 i5. ' S 9.5 `20.8 39.3 41.2 17.0 5.1 i.3 '0.1 '0.0 ,0\�\\\\ a ° A 0.0 0\ 0.0 0� 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 3.8 A79.9 19.3 13.8 10.2 6.7 4.9 4. 9 2 3.4 89. 8. 5 .1 9.3 5.3 4.9 4. 5.2 8 4.1 1.3 1.2 2.3 .3 21. A� 0 2 9 4.5 4.5 5. 8.3 7.6 5.6 .0 5.4 7.8 17.1 6 2 19.2 G.2 4.2 3.3 1.6 1.8 .2 10.5 25.3 26.6 12.7 5. 2.9 2.5 2.7 3.3 5 5 12.5 30.5 38.5 20.3 10.5 8.4 11.1 3. 0.3 5.8 2.7 1.0 '0.2 '0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 \b�0 �. \ b.2 0.5 P 1 9.4 27.1 19.0 10.9 9.1 6.0 5.5 8 8 5.1 43.2 59. 2 .3 5.9 G.2 7. 1 .9 13.5 1.9 1.9 2. ° 8 3.9 ° A ' 9. 3.3 4.2 5 2 .3 8.4 12.6 G.8 G.8 9.5 20.6 9 5 16.7 6.5 4.6 3.1 1.5 1.5 .0 6.7 10.6 11.0 7.9 3. 1.8 1.2 1.2 1.7 4 2 12.9 40.6 49 Y 26.9 10. 7.2 7.2 7.5 5.6 3.2 1. 0.6 0.2 0.1 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 .0 0. 0 0.1 0.3 1.9 4.9 3.2 20.0 15. .8 11.1 8.5 8.6 8.7 10.3 i4. i .s 5.5 10 3 1 .0I A 3.0 1.9 2.3 2.7 ° 1. ° 3 d 9 3.2 2.6 2.9 3.6 6.9 S' 23. 8 8.4 12.6 40. B 35.7 8.2 5.2 3.5 1.6 1.5 .9 6.6 10.2 11.0 7.5 3. 1.7 1.0 1.0 1.4 3 9 12.5 34.5 44.9 22.2 8.9 4.0 3.3 3.8 3.9 2.1 1.1 10.5 '0.1 '0.1 \\ 1 EXI TI�1, ° e I b.o b.o b.o b.o 0. 0.0 b.1 �b.5 .9 10.5 28.1 41 9 2 .6 9.9 10.8 10.0 11.0 10.3 7.9 6.3 5 .3 4.1 7.5 10 7 .6 .1 27.9 3.1 2.3 3.5 4.2 3.3 1.8 b.9 °b.4 ° 0.9 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.8 2.9 4.3 15.1 8.3 37 5 9. 8.7 12.1 36.8 6`9 31.6 7.5 5.0 3.4 1.6 1.7 .2 12.1 33.9 37.9 15.9 5. 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.9 2 9 7.2 14.6 16.3 11.4 4.8 2.3 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.1 1 1 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 0.0 0.1 b.2 3.1 .0 6 .0 7.4 16.2 16. 13.3 11.5 9.9 7.8 5.4 3.8 4.0 7.1 9. .4 16.0 2.7 3.3 6.5 7.3 6.9 2.9 1.2 b.5 b.4 0.7° .2 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.9 2.5 6.5 10.9 11.9 7.0 7.2 7.1 8.0 16.2 5 3 13.6 5.9 4.0 3.1 1.5 1.5 .8 12.1 34. 377 15.2 5. 1.9 0.9 0.8 1.3 2 6 5.5 9.8 10.2 8.5 4.1 1.9 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 \ a I > ��m�rq&o.o •' b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.1 0.3 0.9 1 .5 17. .3 5.0 47.3 45. 1 .5 12.5 10.9v 8.5 6.3 5.7 8.2 .5 6.81 .1 5.8 3.5 7.1 1 .4 2.0 6.6 2.0 b.8 b.6 In 7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.3 2.1 3.1 3.6 3.9 5.3 6.2 8.3 17.3 3 14.0 6.1 4.1 3.0 1.5 1.6 .3 12.9 36.8 39.6 17.0 5. 2.0 1.0 0.9 1.9 2 8 7.0 14.3 15.9 11.1 4.5 1.9 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2y 0.1 0.1 . o b.0 b.0 0.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.1 b.1 b.9 1.7 .8 9. 5 8.9 17.3 10.7 8.2 9.5 11.6 13.4 2 .9 16.A 4.4 9.8 3 .9 9.6B)2.4 9.9 2. .9 b.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 .5 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.9 2.5 4.8 6.3 11.8 38.6 0 2.1 7.7 5.0 3.3 1.6 1.5 .0 6.9 11.9 12.1 8.4 3. 1.7 0.9 0.8 1.3 3 7 12.1 33.6 43.9 21.3 7.3 2.2 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1' 0.1 0.0 / (�,\� 1 EXI TIN B �.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 �Ot0 0. b.o !o � 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.7 5.0 .5 61.1 70.7 32. 1 .5 3.4 12.8 14.7 15.8 /24.1 3.13 '26.8 4.6 9.7 2 . 6.4 27.2 9.1 2. .1 .8 0.7 0.8 '0.8 '0.8 '0.7 '0. '0 7 .7 '0.6 0.9 2.0 4.2 6.0 11.9 39.6 1 6 2.9 7.8 5.0 3.2 1.5 1.5 .0 6.5 10.9 10.6 7.8 3. 1.6 10.8 '0.7 1.1 3 2 11.4 38.0 46.9 23.8 6.8 2.0 '0.6 '0.3 '0.2 '0.1 '0.1 '0.1� 0.0 0.0 � �• A , I 1 / b.0 b.0 .0 b.0 b b. b b. b.0 0 b.0 b.1 b.1 b.2 1.2 2.0 X4.1 1.2 49. 3 .9 8.6 18.2 17.1 1//4.71 17.9 37)0 15.3 3.2 4.9 1 .4 4.9 11.1 1. .3 1.2 '.1 2.9 2.5 1.5 1.2 1.0 +0 .5 0.7 1.8 3.6 5.1 8.3 18.2 1 0 4.6 6.2 4.2 2.9 1.5 1.7 .6 9.5 18.8 19.9 11.6 4. 1.8 0.9 0.7 1.0 2 6 8.2 24.8 32.1 14.5 5.5 1.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 D.o D.o D.o D.o b. o 0.0 D.o b.0 b.0 .0 b.l_ b.119.1 b.l b.2 5 1.3 2. 1 .2 4 .7 8.7 55.6 20. d3 .8 12.7 2.9 3.2 5 3 .6 5.0 2.6 1. 2.1 3.0 6. 9.0 8.8 4.2 2.5 1.8 0.9 0. 0 7 .7 3.5 4.7V 7.2 15.9 51.1 3.4 5.6 3.8 2.9 1.4 1.5 .3 15.0 48. 5& 19.6 5. 1.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 1 5 3.6 6.2 7.3 5.5 2.5 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.9 1 '0.2 10.1 D.o D.o D.o D.o 0. 0.0 D.o D.o D.o b.o b.o 0.1 411!�1 01 0.2 b. 6 1.2 6 61.1 29. /1 8 ' .� 69.1 29.9 3.2 2.7 3.8 3.7 '2.4 1. '.5 3.7 6 26. 10.2 4.8 2.9 1.3 0.6 0.9 2. 2 5.9 11.1 34.8 2 0.0 7.0 4.7 3.0 1.3 1.4 .9 13.2 48. 53.2 19.2 5. 1.7 0.7 0.5 0.7 12 2.2 3.7 4.2 3.2 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.8 2.5 1.8 '0.5 10.3 FD a 1 Is B B b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 .0 b.0 b.0 0.0 b. b.o b.l 0.1 0.1 0.1 b.2 b. 6 1.9 1 .5 78. 27.6 2.8 1.9 2.8 3.9 4.5 3.3 2 .9 4.7 7.6 33. 13 2 .3 3.5 1.5 0.9 1.2 2.5 4.8 'G.7 11.9 42.4 ' 2 2 7.9 4.7 3.0 1.3 1.2 .1 8.6 21.3 22.9 10.7 4. 1.9 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.l 2.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.3 2.3 7.9 23 .3 23.9 2.9 0.8 EXISTING b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o D.0 0� b.o o b.o b. 0.1 0.1 0.1 b. 1, i.1 2.5 .6 8 8.7 .9 2.0 1.7 5.2 7.0 7.2 5.8 5.2 5.4 7.9 21. 3 .1 7.6 10.6 3.3 1.9 1.5 2.2 4.1 6.5 8.0 12.1 25.5 1 1.1 6.5 5.5 3.5 2.3 1.1 0.9 .8 4.1 6.8 6.8 5.1 2. 1.5 1.0 0.9 1.3 2 9 3.3 2.7 3.0 8.2 23 A 21.6 13.7 23.3 57.6 75.2 38.3 3.1 1.0 XISTING 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 R 0 o. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 3.0 4.1\ 6.0 X12. 5.5 1.6 6.6 9.7 13. 10.9 9.1 9.1 7.3 6.3 1 .4 .7 4.6 2.8 8 5. 0.4 13.0 2.7 17.0 29.5 1 6 6.3 2.7 2.0 1.7 1.0 1.2 .8 3.1 9.1 9.5 9.0 9. 4.2 2.6 3.1 10.6 0 29.6 19.2 25.8 62.0 75.1 37.5 19.2 12.5 19.3 16.9 11.6 G 2.5 1.0 FF OF BITUM7NUUS EXISTING b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 .0 b.0 .0 b.1 b.1 b.3 b.8 1.6 2.1 3.3 1.5 .1 18.7 40.2 33. 1 .0 4.2 12.0 10.5 8.9 7.6 5. 9 2.5 2.0 2. 9 3 .8 3.5 =29.� 33.1 74.0 6.3 .4 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.6 2.9 .1 5.9 4.6 G.1 1 4 45.3DG�23.3 13.6 26.2 G2.9 72.6 31.6 13.3 13.6 21.2 18.0 12.1 7.8 G.9 9.3 9.6 7.9 1 2.3 1.2 R XISTING XISTING b.6--b.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.o D.a� o D.o D.o D.o b.o D.o D.z 0 0.8 0.8 b.5 0.5 i 8 4 .9 .3 7.4 10.9 9.4 8.6 5.e .7 2.7 2. 4.4 .0 22.2 X4.1 1.6 38.6 9 .4 4.3 4.s 4.7 4.1 6.5 59.0 24.7 16.8 31.7 69 1 65.2 23.4 11.3 12.5 17.8 15.9 11.3 7.9 7.2 oa a 6.1 5.5 6.4 EDA.w 5.s 1.9 1.1 E ISTI IXISTING E ISTING � BlTuwmous \ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 .2 3 .4 0.4 0.4 0.2 o.s 2. 5.8 ' .9 .0 4.8 27.7 15. 7 11.6 9.1 7.9 5.s 4. .0 .3 18.3 44. 47.6 27.7 30.2 52.5 s 21.0 6. 61.3 2s.s 17.4 39.1 z 60.7 24.z 13.z 19.s 16 6 15.6 11.7 6.8 '.8 7 5.8 5.5 5.4 4.7 3.4 1.3 0.7 / EXI ELSEA R�' b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b. b.2 .2 b.2 .1 b.1 b.2 .5 1.3 2.4 6.1 1.1 48.6 42. 29 3 S. 3.3 10.8 9.7 8.9 7.2 6.2 15.4 18.6 6.6 21.4 37.2 .2 3.4 64.9 49.6 20.0 11.3 15.3 0.7 27.1 23.2 15.1 11.0 11 4 10.6 7.6 5.0 4 7 3ng7 �� GE 3.7 4.2 6.3 '6.4 5.9 3.2 1.3 0.6 O pFFICE/GAR, FT b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b. b.1 b.1 �0.1 b.1 b. 0.6 1.5 7.5 8 11 ' .1 21.8 17.0 13.9 11.5 10.6 9.6 8.0 9. 12.0 5.2 28.7 65.7 1.3 1.2 13.8 14.2 11.4 9.5 12.4 2.3 47.1 49.9 29.5 11.9 9. 7.7 5.1 3.5 2. SINGLE STOP INZ AREA=6 X97 6.2 12.7 13.8 12.3 5.8 1.8 0.7 XISTI XISTING EX STING MB BUILDING FGO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.0 0.1 0.1 b.l b.G/ b.0 b.1 b.1 0.8 1.3 8. 3 63.7 49.3 22. 17 1 .2 12.6 11.6 12.3 13.5 16. , 39.5 9 8.6 8.8 7.6 8.0 10.5 0.3 50.6 53.0 31.9 9.5 G. 4.1 2.9 1.3 0 Cp CRE1E 3 6.1 19.3 45.0 56.9 43.6 13.4 I 2.9 1.0 \ � V r� EXISTING 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 b.1 b.2 b.e 1.7'-3.3 9.s 1 51. 4 '3 1 .6 9.1 15.0 15.9 7-3 29.3 58.0 4 6.6 6.4 5.8 5.2 5.5 7.0 1.7 20.7 22.8 19.0 6.7 4. 2.7 1.9 0.7 b. b.2 0.2 0.2 0.9 1. `.4 6.6 16.5 64+C 63.4 15.7 { 3.2 1.0 EXIS EDGE OF BITUMINGUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 .0 b.o b 1 1 b.1 b.z b.8 1.8 4.7 17. 4 ' .1 8.a 26.3 20 19.0 5.8 21.8 36.4 .3 .3 6.2 4.6 3.7 3.7 4.5 .7 8.7 9.9 9.0 6.5 3. 2.7 1.6 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.1 3.2 6 ®NCR 56.3 68.6 54.9 15.5 6 3.1 1.0 EXIS I CB® 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 b.0 b. b.1 1 ' .1 0.2 1.2 1.7 4.2 15. 9.1 75.4 66. 28.6 8.5 30.6 63.3 .1 0.2 8.6 6.0 4.9 4.3 5.8 .2 8.9 13.7 16.3 15.4 7. 4.1 2.4 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 2.2 .7 B.fl Go 19.7 21.3 19.1 7.6 3 2.1 0.7 � TI A E ISTING b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o o b. 0.1 0.1 0.2 i.1 2.0\ .8 13.6 9.7 0.8 40.1 1 .0 6.6 3.6 8.3 4.6 4.7 7.3 11.2 14.6 35.7 49.4 812.8 i4 8 6.3 3.5 i.3 0.9 0.2 0.1 a.1 a.1 0.2 0.6 i.3 `2.z 3.6 7.2 7.1 7.1 3.s 2 i.3 0.5 EXISTING M I GNc b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b. b.o '.o b.1 b. .1 0.1 0.2 b.9 i.7 6.s o. 9.0 31. 9.z 9.6 3s.7 i1.6 4.9 5.6 io.e iz3 19.6 41.3 55.0 48.7 17 9 7.7 4.1 1.6 0.6 `0.2 `0.1 `0.1 `0.1 0.2 OpMD 3 `2.1 3.3 3.6 3.2 `2.1 1I 0.9 `0.5 EXISTING b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o o b. b 0.0 0.1 0/1 w\ b.1 0.2 lousi YI6n 2 i 3 3.0� .9 .1 47-9 15.3 7.2 12.6 27.9 37.3 27.1 29.7 32.7 27.1 13.6 6.5 3.7 1.7 0.6 0.3 *0 .2 0.1 0 .2 0. 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.8 OI 0.5 0.3 EXISTING b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o o b. b.1 b.1 \b.y b.2 b.s i.3 .9 5.6 z. 4 3. 3. .6 z 9.3 73.7 65.5 49.5 2s.1 9.4 4.s 2.4 i.1 b.s b.2 o b.3 b.3 b.9 b.3 b.3 b b.2 *0 .2 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 0.0 .0 0. -m ' 1 b.1 \ b.3 i i.1 i.3 ' 7 0.8 0. op27.1 3384rTU6EXISTING 38.6 i1.9 3.7 i.6 b.7 b.3 b.2 mo.1 SINPRiNTSP �Rq3 oR°GF A ate. b.1 b.1 b.1 b.l b.1 b b.1 b.1 C1.6111 \ F°o r� b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 '.1 0.2 0.5 b/9� 0.s b.3 b.2 b.2 0.2 0.7 I.s 2.s 3.-2- i1 '11.1 .4 2.5 i.0 E&L6 OF b.3 0.1 .1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 0.0 \ BITUMINNU 3 yEDGE GE EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE LETTER FIXTURE MOUNTING LAMP LENS/ MANUFACTURER & REMARKS TYPE TYPE 0. 0.3 DIFFUSER CATALOG NUMBER 0.2 A SITE POLE 1000W - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE 1.2 1.3 LIGHTING 22'-0" POLE METAL HALIDE 0.3 MHLDFT1000 0.1 0.1 STANDARD 2'-0" FOUNDATION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,p HILA DINGU 0 (DOUBLE HEADS) `0.0 `0.0 B SITE POLE 1000W - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE LIGHTING 22'-0" POLE METAL HALIDE MHLDFT1000180 STANDARD 2'-0" FOUNDATION RETE CURB (DOUBLE HEADS) C SITE POLE 1000W - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE LIGHTING 22'-0" POLE METAL HALIDE .0 b.o MHLDFT1000 0.0 0.0 STANDARD 2'-0" FOUNDATION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 (FOUR HEADS) 0.1 0. 0.1 AC FLOOD LIGHT SURFACE 40OW - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE ' 3 'CURB 0.2 METAL HALIDE 0.1 MHHR40OMH '. MAC FLOOD LIGHT SURFACE 150W - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE 0. 0.0 0. 0` 0.0 METAL HALIDE .0 b.o MHHR150MH b.o .0 b.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. '0.1 0. 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 V '0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 C ON 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.1 .5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,p HILA DINGU 0 `OI `0.0 `0.0 RETE CURB C .0 b.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 `0.1 `0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 ' 3 'CURB 0.2 0.2 0.1 '. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0` 0.0 0.0 .0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o b.1 0.1 0.1 b.1 a. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.1 b.1 b.l b.l b.1 b.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. '0 b.o 0.0 .0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o b.1 b.1 b.o b.o b.o b.o ox --o-.D- 'o.o 'ox ox o.l .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.o 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � .o b.o 0 .0 b b 0 0.0 \ CONCRETE \ CURB b.o o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o o o b.o b.o.0 \ CO/VC .0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.o 0.0 b.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.o 0.\ 0.0_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G�R�o o b.o b.o b.o o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,0 0.0 0.0 0.00. b.o b.o b.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.o�.0 0.0 1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E-1.00 SCALE: 1"=60'-O" N KEYED NOTES: 01 ADD CUSTOM CUT OFF SHIELD. O2 EXISTING TYPE 'MAC' FIXTURE MOUNTED ON FLAG POLE AT 4'-0" ABOVE GRADE. TILED AT 90°. ELECTRICAL SHEET INDEX 1<1A 11A © Copyright 2017 LA(PB Zr7glrreers, Anc. Rochester, MN 507-424-6840 St. Paul, MN 651-633-1223 www.lkpb.com CAMPING WORLD SITE LIGHTING 3801 CHELSEA ROAD W. MONTICELLO, MN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DATE: _/_/17 REG. No.: 23791 RENEWAL DATE: 06/30/18 ALLEN V. THEISEN DRAWING HISTORY: NO ISSUE DATE ISSUE FOR PERMIT O O V O March 03 2 2017 lz 0 0 °RcoNsI-- This document may be an electronic file or may be printed from an electronic file provided to the user. It is the sole responsibility of the user to ensure that the content and quality is consistent with the content and quality of the paper documents on file at LKPB This Sheet may be a Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet. Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. scale: AS NOTED drawn by: TVB checked by: AVT date: _/_/17 project contact: DONOVAN GESKE (donovan.geske@lkpb.com) project no: 2017. .00 sheet title sheet number E-1.00 F I FO, (;nlnr 1 7 North Building - SE Elevation North Building - NW Elevation South Building - NE Elevation Existing metal rnnf c+nffi+ Q. South Building - SW Elevation 10'-0" PYLON CABINET ELEVATIONS 11/4" =11-011 SQUARE FOOTAGE: Proposed = 10.0' x 20.0' = 200 Total SF SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Manufacture new pylon cabinet as shown and described. 2. Manufacture new steel support structure as per engineering to support new pylon cabinet. 3. Dig new foundation as per engineering for new steel support structure. 4. Embed new steel structure in below grade concrete footer and allow recommended time for concrete to cure. 5. Install new pylon cabinet to steel support structure. 6. Connect to electrical primary provided by clients certified electrician. 7. Confirm proper illumination prior to departing site. DESCRIPTION: 1. Cabinet is double face extruded aluminum with retainer system. 2. Cabinet is internally illuminated with LED power strips. 3. Faces are flexible vinyl with digitally printed graphics. 4. Steel support structure will be as specified by engineering. 5. Steel structure will be embedded in below grade footer as per engineering. COLOR SCHEDULE: 0 White 3M Panagraphics III Vinyl Substrate Q Pantone 2945-C I As Per Art To Be Provided - Gloss Black Enamel Paint IIT0000000 GE LED Power Strips THE BION OF PERFORMANCE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1077 West Blue Heron Blvd., Riviera Beach, FLA 33404 Phone: (561)863-6659/(800)772-7932 Fax: (561)863-4294 NORTHEAST DIVISION 707 Commerce Dr., Concord, INC 28025 Phone: (704)788-3733 / (800)772-7932 Fax: (704)788-3843 www.atlassignindustries.us This design / engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications may be duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. © Copyright 2017 S.O. No. 77166 Sheet No. 001 Date 0310212017 Path Camping World 1 MN 1 Monticello PM S. Hunt Drawn By D. Rodgers Scale As Shown Revision 1 04119117 By DR Revision 2 09119116 By DR Revision 3 010116 By AA Revision 4 010116 By AA Revision 5 010116 By AA Revision 6 010116 By AA Approved by: Date: Q APPROVED AS SHOWN Q APPROVED AS NOTED Q CORRECT & RESUBMIT UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. rrLISTED 00 - imp ,� «�- Approved by: Date: Q APPROVED AS SHOWN Q APPROVED AS NOTED Q CORRECT & RESUBMIT 218' SCOPE OF WORK: COLOR SCHFAULE: 1. Manufacture new Myon cabinet tr shownandr engineer 2 Menufadure new Moral support structure as per engineetlag L____jWbite 3M Persians III Vlaryl Substrate toaupporl Crew pylon cabinet ® Pentane 294SC 1h PerAd To Be Provided G. Gig new fountla5on as per engineering for new sleet support sbuctum. As shown 4. Embed new sled strucum in below gods concrete footer and allow ® Gloss Black Enamel Not commended time for concaele to mre. GELFDPower Selps S. Install new pylon cabinet he steel suppotl structure. 6. Conned W electrical primary provided by dents cKfied electrician. _ 7. Confirm proper Illumination prior to assorting site. DESCRIPTION: 1, Cabinet Isdoublelecxminated duminumowe strips. system. 2 Faces; hIs Internally Illuminated with LED power strips. 3. Padres are flexroleortM toreoyl win digwflU can spllyecified printed graphics. engine 4. Sleet suppwlswillbeemboddes In balm graingineering. 5. SIeeI simclum will be embedded In below gaatle footer as per engneedag. FULLNEW 1116"=1'A" CORPORATE HFADOUARTERS w xwawrwnmxc�i�ml NORIHFASf DIVISION m.ntmaP TAM Ai Mi w www.v<mlenmduMes.us mnmsy,lwpmnlnphmiwarmmsbn Mmnwee uo�rymomMomavP,wnacem"phevm xemmmovonea"op. Nopidamtn waspeormuooeimso�aoymh4nieoua ninlm usseynomrtvu o ®cw�nwmn 30 Gvwlto Woaltll MRlmonymep PM S.Nvnl Drawn By o.Roduare Snlp As shown Rclolonl 94119111 91 BE RpwslvnR Aevislon 3 Anitlanq Rvlislon 5 _ iinlslov6 e Monticello, MN ((U� asa�oogr"oa�i6s 9M�c eppavm q' � "®a Archived: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:03:28 AM From: Walter Kucharyszyn Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 9:29:43 AM To: Angela Schumann Cc: Melissa Nance Subject: RE: Camping World Importance: Normal Angela, That's correct. Thank you, Walter K_. From: Angela Schumann [mailto:Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 9:22 AM To: Walter Kucharyszyn Subject: RE: Camping World Walter, To confirm: Camping World will meet sign ordinance standards for a pylon 32' in height and 200 square feet in area. Camping World would like to seek allowance under the PUD for a flag 130' in height. Proposed locations as per plans. Angela Schumann, AICP Community Development Director City of Monticello www.ci.monticello.mn.us 763-271-3224 Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government office is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Walter Kucharyszyn Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2017 11:17 AM To: Angela Schumann <Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us> Subject: Camping World Angela, I spoke with Melissa and we will adhere to the pylon sign requirements. However, we still would push for the flag. Thank you, Walter K Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note' 4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone NOTE: The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, we request that you (i) not read, use or disseminate the information, (ii) advise the sender immediately by reply email and (iii) delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that may affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by FreedomRoads, LLC or any of its affiliates for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. NOTE: The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, we request that you (i) not read, use or disseminate the information, (ii) advise the sender immediately by reply email and (iii) delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that may affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by FreedomRoads, LLC or any of its affiliates for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. v M N L.L N � O U j 00 bo M Ch co T-11 3/8" Cut Size (VIF) 7'-8"V.0. (VIF) PROPOSED FACE REPLACEMENTS 1 314" =1'-0" SCOPE OF WORK: Manufacture and install replacement faces in existing monument sign as shown. NOTE: Verify all dimensions in field prior to production. DESCRIPTION: 7328 LD white acrylic with exterior surface applied vinyl graphics. EXISTING CONDITIONS I NTS SQUARE FOOTAGE: Proposed = 4.0'H x 8.01 = 32.0 SF COLOR SCHEDULE: 0 7328 White Q 3M 3630-167 Bright Blue Vinyl PROPOSED COMPOSITE I NTS THE BION OF PERFORMANCE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1077 West Blue Heron Blvd., Riviera Beach, FLA 33404 Phone: (561)863-6659/(800)772-7932 Fax: (561)863-4294 NORTHEAST DIVISION 707 Commerce Dr., Concord, INC 28025 Phone: (704)788-3733 / (800)772-7932 Fax: (704)788-3843 www.atlassignindustries.us This design / engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications may be duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. © Copyright 2017 S.O. No. 70860 Sheet No. 2 Date 31312017 Path Camping World 1 MN 1 Monticello PM S. Hunt Drawn By C. Barbato Scale As Shown Revision 1 09109116 By DR Revision 2 09119116 By DR Revision 3 010116 By AA Revision 4 010116 By AA Revision 5 010116 By AA Revision 6 010116 By AA Approved by: Date: Q APPROVED AS SHOWN Q APPROVED AS NOTED Q CORRECT & RESUBMIT UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. LISTED imp Approved by: Date: Q APPROVED AS SHOWN Q APPROVED AS NOTED Q CORRECT & RESUBMIT STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Project: Camping World Flag Pole & Footing 38011 Chelsea Rd Monticello, MN Project Number. 7166 J°mp aced For. Symonds Flags and Poles, Inc 7514 Pebble Drive, Building #30 Port Worth, Texan 78118 Date: October 2016 Prepared By... Ryan Hazelwood, EIT Reviewed By., OF David A. Auer, PE, SE pre,, '� � ✓ Ensign Engineering `r,V 45 West 10000 South, Suite 500 I hereby carttry that this glair, ;>,pecift-aflon. or Sandy, Utah 84070 report was prepared by meor wader my direct P; (801) 265-052 supervision app that 6 �-,m a dusIV Ut—m.sad Professional Enoincer tinder the taws of the F, (801) 255-4449 State of i €nftesrta. DaWd B. AIW i't ntName: ... �� erlsrgrteng.cot� ,+ Prolod. Cori"pino w41ir1 R19 Pot A € Morl _ _ r'ix ocl ita - 7166 _. . �! �i i4 R ■1i N ByF VA* Haw0m)od, E17 C a"xknd By OAA G S G Lula- 010aer 2016 �ro4tR6 u1 {MG.�Y.Yr,�E3 - i„EN�RA4 ir�dM?CT lNFt1RMl�iMC7�M Plowc,l Camplks0 World Flap Pala R. Fooling €pro ttct Addr68s: 3601 Cholsaa Rd MNonffoollo, 6mN Latitude: 46 2N Nrrk1bikrprrolimotol Lwgltudu}-03:401 'Nswt{Approximalol. CAmil. Symonds Faag3 and Po4t, Inc ;;trtr tteRi C:ok%" rrls tar 130' Rag Pow row%som Type PwAtro Type F tri FC*i!N 'iI.2w 06FlMk to Frrlal' ii _.. ari. M&MR&AMWIRAMA CONCREYE & $MOMNrORCiNG STEEL SKCIFCCA IONS! roollntls d FC o Wali[nv Wall. 3.000 Ina c3ratGEwomm t,OM PA Sirils#3k1 Afla $ psi O"mingf.9how Waft 4.000 psi Nfwnwd Relltllttvino Saw ASTM A M6 Grode Citb ASTM A700 i3{arlo.60 Weldable Nbar fs to 1A umd hhero wed% urlr spe ged on 8 Li tmo d4meftnts Vw uidod Wuu railmm: ASTM A165 - FlAt sh"t.n. not Polls dS wast lormu HOuth. ",�'',t✓ce 500 1 '.Swt1y-. Uta4l(14 70 1 i801 g 2[ r5 05 19 I.. &I A iRO COM Vnx-two Troyes: r4 POW__ DesignCmdo: 2015RIC INArt#rlh/1`001.OiT i�,F916► 1dAD5, Wirm apetrd: 115 nvph.- 3 towntt! Gust -.. In'xprk::xRu::._ C sags RePM r wpony �rraatan p fws Dew RA Redo" t P10iowl 3tlltt>i:+r:s" NA. .... ... ......_ Alk.. obleBeoinlgPre.swro _ Mo. pat Pa%mva Neswre 750 plip Adivo Ptossura: 45PIA _ Al Mttent Pt"Aure: ~ . 60 . lrsl r tlietent.ofFk*m.It 0.25. row%som Type PwAtro Type F tri FC*i!N 'iI.2w 06FlMk to Frrlal' ii _.. ari. M&MR&AMWIRAMA CONCREYE & $MOMNrORCiNG STEEL SKCIFCCA IONS! roollntls d FC o Wali[nv Wall. 3.000 Ina c3ratGEwomm t,OM PA Sirils#3k1 Afla $ psi O"mingf.9how Waft 4.000 psi Nfwnwd Relltllttvino Saw ASTM A M6 Grode Citb ASTM A700 i3{arlo.60 Weldable Nbar fs to 1A umd hhero wed% urlr spe ged on 8 Li tmo d4meftnts Vw uidod Wuu railmm: ASTM A165 - FlAt sh"t.n. not Polls dS wast lormu HOuth. ",�'',t✓ce 500 1 '.Swt1y-. Uta4l(14 70 1 i801 g 2[ r5 05 19 I.. &I A iRO COM Ensi n Enginenring PrpjAct Tide Flag � a 45 West 1tk3 ) South, Suite 500 bigineer: Aksx 4fawkins € f*ct 10. Sarirly, LUh 139030 Pidject besec. Flagpole Pr (801) 255,6529 General Section Property Calculator Ffnad Section f'ra es TOM Area %-40+ 1PA2 Calculated final CA instance rMM Datum: X C Rlst. 0.0 iii Y og 61st. 10 in Edge Distances. from CG.: R-,-T%L-XCAN?R 0NV2G>grwi;Fk cif' ING:itss 2645.Bu?P.n.a sp..Yaar'S.M6 flu +x 9.if in r -x 40 fay +1' 8.0 in x •Y 1 } {... Slfi 6ili1fi Ixx� _ 1,eltu.ltlirl"4 IYy a 1,38q.161104 � Sxx : _ Y 153.352 V3 fffj Sxx' +Y 153,352 W3 Syy -Xy,r .. 5'3.352: @ yy - #X it ciff3 153352 Hn " r xx 4.137 in ryy 4W In General 8bapes c.1 Rados - 9,OOtl In Thickness 0.375 in Row1on 0 doe CCW Area - 20,764 inq %cg n O.Ow In txx- 806.6311n t Sxx µ 69.626 W3 Rxx, 6,233 in YCg = qM in Ift . 8W.631 10M Syy - 69.w io?9 Ryy = 8,.233 in 'Glrc . 2 rltld is _ 7.ft in - ;fhfcliness 6.31..5 in its tatkxi ' SI r 1F1N Asea 2 16,062 fn12 ftcq r ti.ODD in Ixx U 372.760 in"4 Sxx = 53.251 fe3 Rxx x 4.8199 Ycg = 01000 in f}y = 372,760 In'14 SW z $3.261 ln"3 m 4.819ira Giro : 3 ITact 4s tt .. .rs.315 in 7 hfi kness Q,375 in; Rntatlo 4 = q d—ft ccw Area 12.223 in°2 XCO w U00 in Ixx r 164.673 leo Sxx - 30.631 W3 PA 7 .3.671 in YCO 2 "GO 4 t64,673 In'14 Syy = 34.637 i1A3 Ryy - 301 in Circ : 4 _-..__, _ _.__, ,_.. Radius = . 3.313 iri __ f iii kness #f.316 Axea 7,364 inA2 XCO* q„fl00 in Ixat - 36,M iW4 Sxx = 111.896 ifoa Pxx 2.214 in Yca2 g 0.000 it 4y = WON InA 4 Sip/ rt 10,890 W3 = 2.214 in gn h:- 130 ft Uj en 18 in 10.75 in 1-1 30 fr h3; 4 0 ft W 2 - 14 in W,J;. 6.625 )!; h2 4 , 0 ; Fr h, 4 20 ft V,f,lo Hedaht 110�e Widths Pute Height's Wind Loads on Pole (Per NAAMM EIP1001-07) ENSIGN Wisld VOOCity ASCE 7-10 (frpb) Ad3kisted to ASCE 7-05 Czar t .14 Gust EffOct Factor Recommended for Flag poles Ci3lclllatiolls for h -- 120 S z 4 d 4- -7- 4 e ` 129 0.82 deq4'- *V F -d 4)—" , C d4- 0.82 900 2,01. 1 14 C d4'm if C deq4� 0.4 0.45 else f C deq4> I. 101 1.10 else C deq4 2 P4:. 0. 00256-V , C d4' C K4, U-24.8 A 4.. h 4' W 4. 11 , 0 4 ft 2 m b4- A 4' P -i psf, 2, 4. 32.9kip ft Ave Heiqbt above Ground fft) Draq Coefficient E'P' OOI Table 3.2.4 110ight Coefficient FGIOOI Eq. 2 Wind Pressure (psf) FPIOOi Eq. I Mea of Lole Moment at Base rest,.)Iting from ; I "Ll -x ; '-,ri : ) Calculations tot, 1) = 90 2 3M 90 01. Ave Height above Ground (ft) w 129 Q. 5 deql'" V -d 1.3 W daq.35MWIS MY Cuefficien! PP1001 MW 3.2.4 3) 1.45 Olve if C el.10 WQ else d3' 045 C (Jeq3 1 12� Y5 L) 2.01 900 a -10379 H.eiqht Coefficient FG1001 Eq, 2 —1 W -C h3 �- it. 89911, Wind prensure Qsf) PD0 PI1 tq� I A 3 :w h 3' w 3 - 35,8333 ft 2 M by- NY 13 Ps, z 3 . 41.601 A ip f t Calculations for h — a0 Sement 2 z'" "T" w2 1.1667 129 dV WO d2" deq2 2) 0-45 else if C deQ >1.10 3.10 u1se "cit -ON5 C deq2 112 900 Ft 2 0.0025&V C G- 11 .3911 2 A?:. It "2' 4C), 64;6'1 tt 2 0}132.. A 2 ' P 2 P"3 t - 7, 2. ? 6. 1,i 956 kip f t: Area of Pole MomenL at base resulting from segment 3. AV* Height above Ground (ft) Drag Coefficient M001 Table 3.2.4 Reight Coefficient FG1001 Eq. 2 Wind pre5sure jP6f) FV10,01 Ej. 1. Area of Pole Moment at Base re5ulting from ueqment 2. I Ur -, ?"OG ! 13 Al :4 ki-O, 'lift, Calculations for Ii T-, 1.5 Seqment I z ft W 129 -0,22�,'3 V- d1 1.3 C dI- 0.45 2 0. 00256- v C dl -C hl - G 8.9 2 A t. h w,-45 tt 2 M b I:w A I' P 1. Pst-ZIM6.0493kip ft Ave fieiqli� above Ground (tt) coeql <0 D .45 vOq COeff-icjerlt, PPIUOI Table 3.2.4 0.145 else if `d I>1.:10 1.10 el'se C deql M bpfzile•- M b4 +M b3 + M b2 + R b I - 10 7. 114 3 k ip t t Height Coefficient F01001 Eq. 2 Tf 7,06.41 Ch - 0.86 Wind Ptessure (p5r) FPIDDI Eq, I Area of Pole Moment at Base resulting from Segment I, Wind Loads on Ua_q_(Pr NAAW4 / FPI001-01) H .3 0 f t,f 60 f1:. Z; Flag Geometry 9.5 , hf .01 900 ft ;.21 gh Heit, Coeie fficnt FG1001 Eq. 2 I A H wf -1800ft Area of Flag jbr 2 W -0.0014 V .,.• 4f " 'C lif. Foxce on Flag FG1001 Eq. 5 Polye,itey Flag - Worst Case HY, Ei. w 17' z f . 80 537 kip ft. Mome-nt at, Brixc Kbtoteil :' M +11hPI 197 , 68 k_ip t -r bf a , Morner)L at El�ase of Sregmerit 2 1121M A 4- P 4 ps f h I )+A 3' v 3 P:i f - ( z 3- h 1) 4% A 2' P 2 pst. ( z 2- h 1) + W F�(2f - h 1)- 1?2. 5-124 k 1p 1-1: Engin Er4ineenng 4S West 10NO South, Suite 500 Sandy, Utah W70 P: [801] 2MA0529 E N S I G P: [801] ME Pole Footing Embedded in Soil Desuip'lon, W-Tittellf) Code R910rencos Galculifions per Land Combinations I.Jacd : ASCE 7-10 Generali Wormation P616'F-o'j'p4of-Sha'-pe' ' rlcve NO" Djarneler—, ....... Calculate Min, Depth tot Mkmatife Mouijie3 No Weral RWraint at Ground Surface Allow Passiva Max Passive controlliho Values Gom,Vnp Load CoWnalkxi; *Dt0.60W44j Lateial Lood Mowint NO GroqfwJ Sufface Romraint pfMstiref at In a" Adual fillowaWe 54.0 in 2,50,0 Pct 1.500.0 p5f 2.346 k 187,50 k�ft 90.01 plif 94137 PSI NOWA Title, Fja0KqB Envinep; Ryan flazetwood Priigl Desm fla%ioie Fia-cOMO-Wli pfolect III Vot*W Lo*d (k) k k k k k k A ID*L*H 0000 0.01)0 0.13 00 02 1 Mo iotLfOi 0.000 O.ODG 0.13 0.0 roofing Base Area 1.000 I5M4 M'2 0.000 Maximum Wpmssuro 0.13 00 kst 0.0 Applied qao +D*0.75Du40.750L+H 03500 0.000 1.4I*r*JConc*ft**d Lod, tk) 00 Dishuted Loadii, jk") 1,00 D ' Ned LoW k 0.400 to U:WW1.1ye k 1,000 kffl 1.. --On 187.540 kM S:Bjww k +D+9J0E4H Wo W:Mnd 1. 167 k 0,07110 Wft E , Fadh4uake k 1"100 W H'L4tWWEWtft k 8525 Nyt Lo ld ftfiance otim TOP of Load otim "unit aurfarA 9mund suffam 118.4) ft Mo A BOTTOM of Lobd abm* gumvid suifue to pfolect III Vot*W Lo*d (k) k k k k k k A ID*L*H 0000 0.01)0 0.13 00 02 1 Mo iotLfOi 0.000 O.ODG 0.13 0.0 0.0 1.000 +D*S4)4 0.000 0,000 0.13 ok 0.0 1.000 +D*0.75Du40.750L+H 03500 0.000 0.13 00 0,0 1,00 4D#0.7W40.760S+f,f 000 0.400 11.13 0.0 &D 1,000 4D+(),60W+j1 2,346 187.540 11-36 940.8 971.4 I.ODD +D+9J0E4H 0.000 O.ODD 0.13 0.0 00 1,00( i D i VALt # 01501-445OW4 H 1"100 140.625 10.25 851.0 8525 1.000 Eftswi Er4 n rang Ptgw Title Flagpole 45 WODI 100 South, Ssiste w Engineer: Cyan Haretwraxl pl*ct 10: 5amy Wh $407 4 Ptalect Dow fla41Gole E S I P: 180il 255-0529 w wr,enskner caarr xr+e SiAMLrhMd rn �SNKitF1E;�RPkfs Pole Footing Embedded in Soil En(:FACAW, MC. 1 2926.OUM15.TEAI OO 1025 851.0 852.5 asuni liwa: Wwi lla 0,13 8.0 r *p.75UL.+i1,?5GS•ii4M+H 1.160 140.625 +1a*0.75DL*0.75GS40-W50E*H 0.000 OMO +(fe60D#0.64W40,60H 2:846 t87;500 P0.60040.7%.460H 0,000 0000 En(:FACAW, MC. 1 2926.OUM15.TEAI OO 1025 851.0 852.5 1,000 0,13 8.0 0.0 LMO 1118 940,6 90+1 IM 013 0.0 0.0 I.ODO I IXA 20'4', 10 11 !,4 wa.r!" Moment at Base 2f St-gLnent Moment at, Bas(,'�It�'SJT2LYlt 4 14t -1a p's I - ( 7.4 - 1 h n -1) + W f 1k'7 -1i . -I'l p rt 4 a 2 )�ction Pladutus of..Each SE- Out ErietCalc) 3 In 3 Bendimetre? 4 S 30. 6'x'1 in 3 bi 25.1284 k-1li M 2 72 2 7,,62. 14 Sj M 3 ksi -wof .2-- 14,,2071 ksi Allowable factored st rengtti per 1 21 .3-q3tt kSj S I S 2 18. 4448 k8i 4 C'c3do is -1? k -,O for 36 ksi steel At maximova wi nd, the pole with attacbed flag would not fall. However, tile flag is not expected to nta%y attached with winds exceeding 50 tip13. Calculations without the flag follow. The asauritptioTi is that the flag wil, I rip from tile pole before It is able to transfer maximum. load to the pole. FLAG SHAILL BE, RFMOVF.D M -FORE WIND SPET,,MS RNACH 75 MPH. moment at use wigiout rrilaq M btatalwo e 14 bpole - 107.143 kip f t Monvent at Base of Seqtnent 2 witbout L7L�j M i- A4''4p5r'(2 h +A Per.1 z3- 111) +A2P pof,( z2- h,)- 63.0451 kijp f: 2.. 4- 1) 3- P3' 2 Moment at Base of secimerit 3 witbout Flau M_3wof- AA ��,rrs�'(2 - h - h;�,)+Ayp '- 11 22. 9bi 0 k ip tt 4 1 3 PSf- 1V. h 3 " . 211 MomeriL at. Base of S€�qLfLe_nL4 :!tt,tji(yut I-ja M 4 wo f'- A 4' P 4 PSf 4- h C it 2- h3)-2.74l4kjP ft Se,nclin. �jt,,M,s WIT)IOUT F14AG M btotalwof 14. 3454 ksi -wof .2-- 14,,2071 ksi S 2 F'Wof 8 - 9898 kvi 4wof 3.0192ksi S4 lia�tid S)Lc,s Shol I Hat Exceed 32 ksA] jnLmts for Ertercalr Polo Footinq ?4 kip OCASW—�O.Q211-- - 2 V6 T W; V6 Back Calcul at od Equivalent Pressure of Knewale Adjusted ;a A 1-10 Flag Wind Load increased 0) ASCE 7-10 Loadinq FOUNDATION SLEEVE W/ TAMPED SAND ra FOOTINGOIAMETER FOOTING I boreby ceirtN fl"Pt this- Plein. spedkAdon, or roport was pi-ptrod by fm of under my dired t. ail IhSt I RM a duly Ucet' sod i g In eer un der the laws of the SW6 of Min"01ma. 0av1d 8. After Print Name: to a lid ucen" # GPLE WARNING: FLAG MUST BE REMOVED IF WINDS WILL EXCEED 75 MPH ELEVATION 3V x W FLAG MAX. 6 518" DIA. X 318" THICK X -0' TALL SECTION 10 314" IIIA. X 3W THICK X -40' TALI: SECTION 14* 01k X 3/8* THICK X -4V TALL SECTION 18" DIA. X 30 THICK X -40'TALL SECTION CAMPING WORLD 1-W r„ , ,3801 Chelsea Road SK' Monticello, MN 6536;Z E N S I G N"q­ WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. July 19, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Camping World Development Stage PUD Dump Station Proposal Review City Project No. 2017-011 WSB Project No. 2596-410 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the dump station proposal submitted by Kinghorn Company on July 10, 2017 and offer the following comments. 1. The location, size, material and circulation pattern of the proposed dump stations shall be shown on the site plans. 2. Clarify if the proposed dump station #1 will be open to the public and not just for Camping World customer use. The applicant has identified that dump station #2 at the former Bedrock Motors site, will be for detail personnel use only. Hours of operation will be from Sam to 5pm Monday through Saturday. 3. The applicant is proposing to pump and haul sewage from the dump station off site, which is preferred by the City. 4. Will water be needed for the operation of the proposed dump tanks? If so, the civil plans should identify how this will be accomplished. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02596-410\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-Schumann-Camping World 071917.docz July 19, 2017 Page 2 WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\02596-410\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-Schumann-Camping World 071917.docz CITYOF City of Monticello — Stormwater Site Plan M011t1Ce�0 Review A Stormwater Management Plan is required for: - Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times. - The construction of any new public or private road; or - Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property. Submittals Received Date Camping World East Author 6-15-17 Stormwater Management Plan Parking Lot Expansion 6-15-17 Plan Set Hakanson Anderson Between 3801 and 3936 ❑X ❑ Address: Chelsea Road West Permit No: adjacent lots PID: Date Approved: 0 Date Received: proposed new construction Si ature: • Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and existing 0 Area of construction Site Size (acres): 4.359 Disturbance(acres): Not provided Existing 3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation Proposed 3.794 (2.276 new Impervious (acres): 1.518 Im ervious (acres): impervious) A Stormwater Management Plan is required for: - Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times. - The construction of any new public or private road; or - Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property. Submittals Received Date Document Author 6-15-17 Stormwater Management Plan Hakanson Anderson 6-15-17 Plan Set Hakanson Anderson • Each lot corner ❑X ❑ • Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on 0 ❑ adjacent lots General Site Plan Yes 4 No 1. Scale of Survey. Minimum scale 1" = 50'. Maximum size plan sheet 24" x 36" ❑X ❑ 2. Survey signed by a registered survey with elevations in NGVD-1929 datum for the following locations: • Each lot corner ❑X ❑ • Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on 0 ❑ adjacent lots • Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage floor of 0 ❑ proposed new construction • Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and existing 0 ❑ construction • Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction ❑X ❑ 3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation 0 ❑ would be finish grade. Also, no retaining wall is allowed to be built on private property October 2016 4. Retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height have been designed and certified by a 0 ❑ licensed professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired 5. All drainage and utility easements are shown? ❑X ❑ 6. Easements are clear of any encroachments? 0 ❑ 7. New curb cuts proposed? N ❑ 8. If new curb cut is proposed, stamp all survey maps with the curb cut stamp. Also, write a note on the Residential Plan & Routing Approval form reminding the builder that a curb N N cut permit is required if the driveway is moved or a new driveway is added 9. Low floor a minimum of 4.25' (feet) above the sanitary sewer invert elevation ❑X ❑ Comments: - The 100 year HWL for the parking area should be represented on the planset (i.e. 955.25 feet at the east and west inlets to the infiltration system). - The existing contours on the east boundary of the property should be added to Sheet C2. - The planset included details for operation and maintenance of the infiltration system. There is a detailed description of cleaning out the isolator row areas with a jetvac. It is unclear if the ports and jets are adequate for cleaning out the other chambers in the system. This should be considered and added to the plans. - Details for all MH structures were not provided. ErosioiOediment Control Plan Yes No 1. SWPPP notes provided on the plan ❑ 0 2. Temporary stabilization measures provided 0 N 3. Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1 ❑ ❑ 4. Perimeter Control i.e., Silt Fence, Filter Log, etc. ❑ N 5. Phasing for sites that are > 1 acre ❑ N 6. CB Inlet Protection ❑ N 7. Dewatering ❑ N 8. Sediment control 0 N 9. Waste control ❑ N 10. Concrete washout ❑ N 11. Rock entrance ❑ N 12. Street sweeping schedule ❑ N 13. Permanent restoration plan ❑ N 14. Erosion protection at all outlet pipes ❑ N 15. SWPPP includes an erosion and sediment control inspection schedule and person ❑ N responsible for maintenance Comments: - Silt fencing is shown on Sheet C2 however the silt fence is required along the entire curb line and encompass the entire grading area. - Details for a rock construction entrance was provided, however it is not shown on the plans. -SWPPP not provided. When submitted, include missing erosion and sediment control requirements as demonstrated above and follow the SWPPP checklist that the City provided for your use. Stormwater Management Plan EnEw— Yes 4 No 1. Delineation maps for existing and proposed conditions 0 ❑ 2. Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events with an MSE3 type distribution. October 2016 • 2 year 24 hr. (2.84"), 10 year 24 hr. (4.22"), 100 (6.87), 10 -day snowmelt (7.2") ❑ • Modeled direct connected impervious separate ❑X ❑ 3. Off-site drainage included ❑X ❑ 4. Wetlands shown on plans and wetland permitting completed ® ❑ 5. Pretreatment ❑X ❑ 6. Skimmer structures provided on the outlets of all ponds. ❑ ❑ 7. Soil borings ❑X ❑ 8. Design Infiltration Rate Determination — Geotechnical Report or Infiltration Testing ® ❑ provided 9. Seasonal High Water Elevation ❑ 10. Open channel flow calculations ❑ 11. Storm sewer calculations — 10 year event ❑ ❑X 12. Narrative describing the following: Existing conditions consist of open fields, an existing parking lot, and two a. Existing Conditions: existing buildings. Drainage flows to the north part of the lot. Proposed conditions include the addition of a large parking lot and underground infiltration system. The outlet for the infiltration system will connect into the b. Proposed Conditions: existing storm sewer system to the south. Stormwater management includes the addition of an infiltration system to meet volume reduction requirements. c. Stormwater Management for Proposed A downstream regional pond provides rate control for the Site: site. Comments: -The downstream rate control pond was designed for this site to have a composite curve number of 87. The submitted HydroCAD model has a composite CN value of 93. (4.359 ac with CN=98 and 3.794 ac with CN=61) - The stormwater report indicated that there is 2.317 acres of new impervious area created for this project. The HydroCAD model input shows 2.276 acres of new impervious area modeled. This discrepancy should be corrected. - Storm sewer calculations were not provided, however all of the drainage for the site is routed through the underground infiltration system via sheet flow. The only proposed stormsewer (the 18" connection to Chelsea Road) was modeled in HydroCAD and provides adequate capacity for the 10 year event. Water Quality and Volume Reduction "The City of Monticello has adopted MPCA Minimal Impact Design Standards in Chapter 4 of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.10. MIDs Infiltration design criteria as described in the MPCA Stormwater Manual shall be followed for the proposed project " Yes 4 No 1. Volume control provided as per the City's Engineering Design Standards and MIDS (1.1" ❑X ❑ over new impervious surface) 2. Impervious area equal to or greater than the net increase in impervious surface is routed ❑X ❑ through infiltration BMP 3. Sequencing provided for alternatives where infiltration is infeasible ❑ ❑X 4. Required Volume Reduction: 9251 cu. Ft. 5. Provided Volume Reduction: 9330 cu. Ft. 6. Separation to groundwater and/or bedrock is a minimum of 3 feet from bottom of X ❑ infiltration BMP 7. Drawdown time for infiltration BMP is within 48 hours ❑X ❑ 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria ❑X N 9. If infiltration of 1.1" is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? ❑ ❑X Comments: October 2016 -Volume reduction and water quality standards are met with the proposed underground infiltration system. - The infiltration provided (9330 cubic feet) is proposed between 949.75 feet and 950.20 feet. In order to verify that 950.20 feet is the correct elevation to use for this calculation, a detail for the outlet control structure (STM MH#4) is needed. Rate Control Yes 4 No 1. Peak Proposed Discharge Rates < Existing ❑ 2. Existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 year storm? ❑X ❑ 3. Existing infrastructure and EOF for proposed 100 year peak discharge rate? ❑ 4. Proposed flow patterns do not create flooding impacts for structures adjacent to the ❑X ❑ property? Comments: - Rate control is met at the regional pond downstream of the site. However, the composite CN for the development needs to be equal to 87 for compliance with the pond design. Freeboard. Yes No 1. Building Opening: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ® ❑ • 2' above EOF of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ❑ ❑X • 2' above the 100 -yr flow elevation of a swale or channel at the point where the Swale ❑ ❑ channel is closest to the building 2. Low Floor Elevation: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of major basins ❑ ❑ • 2' above EOF of major basins ❑ ❑ • For landlocked basins: 2' above the HWL from back to back 100 -yr rainfalls or 2' above the HWL from the 100 -yr 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. Starting elevation of the basin/waterbody prior to runoff is one of the following: o Existing Ordinary High Water level established by the Minnesota Department ❑ ❑ of Natural Resources o Annual water balance calculation approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Local observation well records, as approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Mottled soil ❑ ❑ October 2016 \ k \R�S956.16 \\ O CB 10' 9 O- ,� F, oA \ �/ / ---F \ k 959.18 0 ^ / -7- fl- of fl - Certificate of Survey _ C, LU V 1/0 A 036 ,,� / \ -_ _957- - �\ /^ E Ig \ 59�+ North Propane Tank / 8 \\ \O y\R&/ 15 HDPE 15" HDPE 1 -CB CC foo/o ` Camp/tng ? NRE=956.09 I �te RE=956.11ToN 2„ \I � Ox' s' 9h / /l ��9 a/ •r � // � - � \ � � / ^N" ••,. \ \ 11/ � � \ ..• e \ o`> / / \ �1 �V \ ° ::-.`: s. / men °9e "o, N,O / �' �J - 1��� V \ Y:.: \ GFF, 9\ / TRF t '0C, C/ • s57.�ss Ox / / / / T \ / 9 FT ti/i o O i iC i \ . f\ \J /1 T I T � F- D- T ?, �•4 s�, TMH l O P 6p \ ` ^ \ \ - i �I \ L - - �• ? PI N Iq t of Chainlink Fence i9 / �h I n� i �J I F.''w:: / ODITj J/ c6 / I CB 1 i ��� �`�� F\9s� �o •.: •.. / l / l/ RE=956.03 / RE=956.08 GF , a.;'• / / .69 \\ \ \ /� u' O / Drainage &Utilit Easement per \ I �/ A F-\ FI\ I T I /1 I\ I h � � � ���� 9SS� X63Ij // �� // play of 9frT1� STREET 2ND ADDITION _L I V� /-\ LJ LJ I �/ I V ss,s� .:..�= ": / + I \ �957��2Z2 / x\6.0140" 369 Northe t 1j( - South line of Block 1, Lot 1 GFF� '''' =` ti< / / 1 4 » �o er/ n Existing Building ss, ':' I 12 0 t y li e / / %% 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITION ao':64 9S 3801 Chelsea Rd. W 68 A Of ' �.;{�• I I // \ \� \ \ \ / MggS q8� ck / - o ,6 \ : • y 957- _G D r S75'22 20 E - / / •��� ��� - - - _X - - - � - - - - - - - -_ - - - I / EIeC h^ y•• -�-- I - M \ \ � 956 - � ` _ �/ Per plot & utillt � � � \7\ \ e " / i s:.. L rn I 1 of yE North line of Bloc 1, Lot 1, - / / - Cabinets ,j N / I o �_ i MgqS q��/T ent \��� �\ � - 4,70 90TH STREET 3R ADDITION r p San M v o _ N 6 4� ,o �OTr T 6 1 M' �;.• RE=9 4.36 O 4" ' I I- - - l� /\ l� l� T n I\ I I $ w o ,\,9 r ]� �: I I \ L_ L_ I / �i \ LJ /-\ LJ LJ I �/ I V I c ~ :,' ' ' \ �'�'.=;;rti UR Loo '..:.;f; ' � _ ,.: ;" � \ I � , 4s9 1-N 692 �lv�� �� \�� , , 956 I I'`'�'. 4':. J \ I 2 2 p.,w - - 9 IooLID 12 00 )- N \ \ �tJ� - Z 1 ( • i. /) ., \ 955.50 N 0 0 J I �� c6 \ I - - _ se Bi I I G \ L a'no 0 \ t 8 \ J p / / CB �`:*' .' ` • • ro ^. r �' "` ? / RE=954.96 I h- - \ FES _� !I� RE=955.00 G N IE=950.79 i I p� I �� h 'j am/ ;'"' `•' //;'•.` �Oco \ -O \ 0) 8889 // \I lr Oc thke9s0 ePR \\ ( m I I \ `58 p / J p \ I\ 6 o p aci 0 \ I\ A A A ^ � \ SB 82 / STRF 7 Ster/ �'N `' °��\ J \ ° w \ a' ',/ V Q \ I rn \00 Q aE ~ \I V I FT3Rot 7 e O \ \ T \ \ �cn6 \ \� / / �/ HOZ �rn \a wQ \ �V/ �z I� 6„ c, 90 f \ \\ \ 95 i o N 0- 0 \ ° i H m cP, LD of / 0] \ E /off' \\ I �S \' \w� I 8 ,% s 958.52 0 �I: =Q \ o I I -ssamM o Ia- \ / w o �� \ °0 12 Storm MH ` \ \ I _ \ a- I / I ° \ /\ f1 f1 I T I /1 I\ w Q 1 G RE=957.81 D Ston T 6� \ \ \ ��i� \Or0/ !f I o ` - 990 c IJ �3 p \ / \ LJ LJ l I l U I v Cn I L 7 / _ I I- \ I I o/ot no9e / / i / / - _ CV a o Q San MH X00 / C I °f 9 c� / a \ o O I O - 0 M \ / G RE=957.49 D \ i \ O jh �t///f / / \ / _ \ - w O c a 9S _ I - - (((��� I 6 :.: s ce S R \ \ c STRy Fo / / \ \ \ 955 / \ V I O a _ _ _ ° �s REB=�6 S ��\9s6'si4\ `� S .33 \ \ess3 SFT 3Rpe�t / l 2 IN, //� \\ I IZ i 0 Q �se663 956 / !gp�er/ rn,,� I \ 1Oiy l / \ \ / 9yk \ I C St \ CB \ / \ Y�� to 956.43 I�� ---- Fy1 \ R o�� \ L/ RE=953.10 I - - - SB B-4 - e�R G J RF S ;tylO 1� 1 �� \� � �s\s��/ 20.0Y 24 LL \ \\ I / / \ \\ \ - li I /-ss7_ _ G 40 11 �S V 1 i \ \ a __954 - Son 1 1 \ I / / \ \ m MH S \\ \ D 29'• 1 Sg \ m CB I V / 1 \ I `^O RE=956.13 C� 2 RCA \ / m / / \ G U ` U a / RE -952.37 H / +� \ 1 1 I \ �D �,, \ \ I� GB I I II I8" l' 1 1 \ I 8" m 24" RCP ' \ 6„ 952.65 I I I \/ I / / _ - _ - - - - - - - - - \ P -BUR I O (n I S \ \ \ \ I I Gas Meter-, o - A/C POUR I I O Q SSonD \ \ V I I Elec. Meter - \ 7 \ C Q Storm MH 9 3 6 gSH \ �eG \ \ - - V / I I I I I I A/C r \\ \ " oBUR- Elec. Meter \ \ \ - � 954.65 G S 4.38 \ �� - - \ _ / / _ I \ \ GP \ O FOUR G 696 /\� r� \ \ \ \ \ I I / / P -BUR AAA- ? o •` \9S) w J "k" F 8' / \ \ 90J \ I I 9h� FES \ ''� \ o� °9e N / I I i IE=949.45 c� � Existing Building �, t 955 - - - // �� I I / / aFFE=95s.04% w � 870 ---- _ r O I 00v Ov `n/ON V/ Storm MH / / I T - - - - o,��\ : CB T �U - J - - - - - 95�)� \ f ....: E=956.05 I R 8\aD 1 / \ 3887 Cheisea Rd. W ' 'M Valve MH I _ SRF,9Miy �\ �\ 12\ _ RE=956.41 �� S \ 36 /1 9S>�N C@ San MH I \ V 957- - J I / f\ r RE=956.52 I I \ I cL 958 / V I \ / I I / N 4 40.00 12 I 41, 38 , \ � S�5 24'49 »E co 00 r O -I O N \ 8'9 a\>'1000 DETAIL00 r� NOT TO SCALE N N O 2010 I \ I ter/y 986 / D 79, ,' �v \ o r Elec. Meter / o, i� OA/ STe o f t c �Q. 00 m J� \ I + 90•• / 8„ Ij9jss o' t / ^� Droi \ I N '\1 / Ren M� --/ 4„ _ PernP/ t `� Utilit q,0,64 at _ RF\9sso \ S 9os y�cP / /P {` °f MgqS �� ement 6 \ \ 4" DI TION \ Existing Buildin I _ 83.3-- 4" 3.3 Jnr, ^N \\ \ D Sto \\ 4" Fence Post er / I FFE=958.26 s6 A/ r -- -- - m �9 \� RE -951 E Fence Post F0, \ r Fence Post an sco ed �/ /^ / c v DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: s'�\ /��`�5�598j22 36 @"R 4 �� / '�6„ �%�/ 2 , RCP o / \ Landscaped- The andscaped-The part of Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 3rd Addition, which lies northeasterly of vacated Chelsea Court as dedicated in 90th Street Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. AND Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 2nd Addition, except that part platted as 90th Street 3rd Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. AND That part of Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 3rd Addition, Wright County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying Southwesterly of the Northeasterly line of Chelsea Court as depicted on the record plat of 90th Street Addition, said Wright County, Minnesota. F -10f, Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. World NOTES: 1. The underground utilities shown have been located from visible evidence, field markings per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 162571745, 170450252 and 170450253 and available mapping. The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated although he does certify that they are located as accurately as possible from information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. Prior to any excavation, contact Gopher State One Call for an on-site location (651-454-0002). 2. The professional surveyor has made no investigation or independent search for easements of record, encumbrance, restrictive covenants, ownership title evidence, or any other facts that an accurate and current title search may disclose. 3. Area of combined property is 633,409 sq. ft. or 14.54 acres. 4. This lot is in Section 10 Township 121 Range 25 5. Benchmarks; MnDot "Monticello MRC RM1" - Elevation=958.82 MnDot "8605 T" - Elevation=951.19 N 50 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND • = Iron monument found O = Iron monument set and marked with license No. 18420. x 800.0 = Denotes existing elevation soo.o = Denotes proposed elevation from grade or development plan = Denotes drainage & utility easement cD O Denotes drainage arrow ® = Denotes offset iron Bearings shown are assumed -800.0.x= Denotes proposed contour Mro from development or grading plan ffo-0-61 = Denotes as -built elevation - SF = Proposed Silt Fence 9S6, - \ J. 19 4 49 »E F0 @OR 0 4„ / - Gas Meter Area w/ sign /\ \ / I 6" ` - - 958 - oo /N Z__ / _958 - \ 441.38 4" R�"5\ z/ 12 D2 » _ _ / RE\ m MH y / / I i� I `�� Star x`49 c �e ossI 1l m \ \ 960.18 \ \ - - / RE, 5 88 ` F U 2 D \S \ \ TNH - 958 - , - 6 - t 95� N�h M \ I \ of % Oq 36" RC t Fence Post F \ co / V 9S) /' R Fem1celPost \ \ S \ \ \ \\ e•y RES thw�rl1957.701 95My7N.�7p/ sRErn,36" �H42 CP\ 8toMR\ SEE DETAILie otnfBlo'ssck - ss3Mggs l �I / \ 958.80 / \ TNH \ \925 ii X L=18.86` \ R=710.00 X1'31'18" \ = Denotes soil boring (by others) GOPHER:. --.STATE ONE GALL CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 6fi1a61-dCO2 • VetrV18p?252.1158 GlOabr MH www,"rwawlean 111 org z O w Ld Q 0 L O E � c O C: L ° O L o M a'°° O y O 0 T° E > °' > O ° c Q° -cn.S (a °�_� E 0 C � c J O rOn " _0a� o N ° ° c� CL 4- 0 O m (n •-O a0 a• T oN N L w -�•Lw:�r_ t O L a L O O Z ca OCL O N >,3:U,) -°m c a� ° J Z O O M 0 M o /1 ' w ` L04 o V) `/J 00 J � m °o T�r- Z) 3 c I rN I��E -0I� o c ° U J o Q U C LL _05 � o 3 C < a� LO W o I V M� U � I M (D O M 0fNf O Lr) II cD O LQ O Lo Q Mro 0 :2 0 O O M M m �1 0 w Z W m Z W o Y 2 O J Q w U Q p Z LLJ a FM4 v z O w Ld Q 0 L O E � c O C: L ° O L o M a'°° O y O 0 T° E > °' > O ° c Q° -cn.S (a °�_� E 0 C � c J O rOn " _0a� o N ° ° c� CL 4- 0 O m (n •-O a0 a• T oN N L w -�•Lw:�r_ t O L a L O O Z ca OCL O N >,3:U,) -°m c a� ° J Z O O M 0 M o /1 ' w ` L04 o V) `/J 00 J � m °o T�r- Z) 3 c I rN I��E -0I� o c ° U J o Q U C LL _05 � o 3 C < a� LO W o I V M� U � I M (D O M 1 U Z z 0 Of w 0 Z Q Z 0 V) Z Q Y 2 N Q Q 2 0 O �+ b.0 4--1 �1 4-4 a FM4 v 1 U Z z 0 Of w 0 Z Q Z 0 V) Z Q Y 2 N Q Dl kk AMENDMENT TO NT CgNTRACT and TAL USE PERMIT Installed Improvements) ■ AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREE CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION / MAAS ADDITWN HI ENDMENT TO DEVELOPIENT CON T V CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT("Agreement") is dated , 20_, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and FRHP LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). RECITALS A. The City and Developer previously entered into a Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit dated November 14, 2016 and filed of record on December 15, 2016, with the Wright County Recorder as Document No. A1332332 concerning the plat of Camping World FirstAddition ("Development Contract") 1 193833vl B. Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Spirit"), is the owner of property legally described as Lot 1, Block I Maas Addition, Wright County, Minnesota, with a street address of 3887 Chelsea Road ("MA Addition") C. Developer transferred all right, title and interest in Lot 1, Block 1, Camping World First Addition, Wright County, Minnesota, with a street address of 3801 Chelsea Road to Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, pursuant to a Special Warranty Deed dated December 29, 2016, recorded January 11, 2017 as Wright County Document No. A 13 34431 ("CWF Addition") D. Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, Camping World First Addition are collectively re ed to as t " operty". E. t, as landlord, and CWI, Inc., a Kentucky corporati and Camping Worl V Ow Sales, LLC, a Minnesota lid liability company, as tenants, entered i a Lease Agreement ed December 29, 201 the Subject Property. CWc., Camping World RV LC and irit subsequently enter nto a Memorandum of Lease for the Subj t Property dated December 2 2016 and recorded January 2017 as Wright County Docurment No. A 34432. id Memorandum o ase grants tenants se term 0 0 years, withthree Successive periods of years each. F. The CWF Addition currently operates a recreational Vehicles Sales/Display and Auto Repair and service operation. The MA Addition is currently a large parking lot with two existing buildings located thereon. G. Developer, on behalf of Spirit, has requested an amendment to the Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and are seeking Planned Unit Development approval to accommodate the expansion of the CWF Addition (consisting of approximately 8.85 acres) by occupying the MA Addition (consisting of apporximately 6 acres) to function cooperatively and support the main sales facility at the CWF Addition (the "Development"). H. Pursuant to City Code, Chapter 2, Section 2.4, a PUD agreement may be approved by a simple majority of the City Council after a public hearing was held on April 4t1i, 2017 and continued to 2 193833v1 July 11, 2017, and recommendation of the Planning Commission. The Developer shall follow the procedures and requirements of the PUD Development and the Development Contract. A PUD agreement shall be memorialized with an Amendment to the Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit, executed by the City and Developer, and recorded against the Subject Property. I. Except as otherwise specifically amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Development Contract are incorporated herein and shall remain in full force and effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors and assigns and shall be recorded against the Subject Property in the office of the Wright County Recorder as promptly as possible after it has been ex t e parties. AM M"M NOW, THEREFORE, THE TIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONDITIONS OF OVAL. The City hereby apWes this Agreement the Planned Unit Deve pment ("PUD") conditioned upfthe DI per entering inta� Agreeme furnishing the sec required by it, and recording this Agreeme t upon SubjectPropertyw he County Recorder egistr of Titles within oIs n dyed (100 s aft e City Council app d the DevelopWt. OF The City hereby grants approval to the Planned Unit Development provided the Development is consistent with the conditions of this Agreement and the specific City conditions, requirements and PUD flexibility as set forth in City Resolution 2017- , adopted by the Monticello Council on August 14th, 2017, and subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff Report dated August I e, 2017, 2017. The City hereby grants approval to the rezoning of the Subject Property pursuant to Resolution No. PC -2017-016 as adopted on July 11, 2017, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other City requirements which are in effect. 2. CONDITION FOR SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS. No changes or amendments to the PUD Agreement shall be approved, nor shall construction commence for such additional land uses, until an amendment of the PUD Agreement is processed and approved, subject to the requirements of the 193833v1 Monticello Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, including the submission of site plans, final grading and drainage plans, final utility plans, and final landscaping plans. 3. ZONING. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Subject Property shall be subject to the zoning regulations for the Planned Unit Development District and in accordance with the plans as identified in Section "4" of this Agreement. 4. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the plans listed below ("Plans"). The Plans shall be as approved with conditions by the City of Monticello on August 14t1i, 2017. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. The Plans may be prepared, subject to roval, after entering the Agreement, fore commencement of any work or on the Subject Prope e Plans vary from the written to is Agreement, I the plans shall control. The Plans are: A.)A. Certificate of Survey Parking Lot Expansion for Camping Worl B. Existing Topography and Removals Plan C Grading, Construction, Drainage and Erosilontrol Plan Details Plan (2 pages)' E. Stormtech SC -740 Chamber Syste Details Plan F. SC -740 Chamber System Standard Cross Section Plan i G. SC -740 Isolator Row Details Plan H. Stormwater Management Plan I. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan J. Site Plan (with waste water dump stations) K. Landscaping Plan L. Sign & Flag plan M. Pylon Sign Detail Plan N. Monument Sign Detail plan O. Fence Detail Plan P. PhotometricPlan Q. ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Plan 5. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following as required to be built within the Development as improvements in accordance with the Plans, as approved with conditions by the City of Monticello on August 14t1i, 2017: D. Parking Lots 4 193833v1 F. Concrete Curb and Gutter G. Street lights H. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control I. Landscaping J. Underground Utilities K. Setting of Iron Monuments L. Surveying and Staking The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City Code and the approved Plans. The Developer will not perform any heavy construction between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for permit which have been prepared by a competent registered I professional engineer to the city for approval by the Ci ineer which approval shall be provided on the condition that such submittals comply with the Plans and this Agreement. The Developer shall i4truct its engineer or a separatethird-party consyltant to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an 00 � 00 acceptable level of quality control. The Developer shall provide for on-site project management via a i Construction Superintendent. In additio the Developer shall provide a (atruction Project Manager and Development Construction ager to see the Developmeii, nd be responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Dev r and the Developer's contractor. The Developer, or its engineer or General Contractor shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 6. SANITARY SEWER TRUNK CHARGE. The MA Addition is subject to a charge for Sanitary Sewer Trunk expenses in the amount of $9,284.80, which includes all platted lots within the Development, payable at the time of Final Stage PUD approval or building permit for the proposed improvements on the MA Addition. The fee is calculated as follows: $3,316.00/gross acre x 2.8 gross acres = $9,284.80 193833v1 22. WATER TRUNK CHARGE. The MA Addition is subject to a charge for Water Trunk expenses in the amount of $6,865.60, which includes all platted lots within the Development, payable at the time of Final Stage PUD approval or building permit for the proposed improvements on the MA Addition. The fee is calculated as follows: $2,452.00/gross acre x 2.84 gross acres = $ 6,865.60 8. STORM SEWER CHARGE. The MA Addition is subject to a charge for Storm Sewer Trunk expenses in the amount of $9,920.40, which includes all platted lots within the Development, payable at the time of Final Stage PUD approval or building permit for the proposed improvements on the MA Additi e fee is 9. S IA] development: A. August 14th, 2017. low - 14th, 2017. Ca) K 2.8 gros res = $9,920.40 following special provisions shall appl, R ■ a '� Implementation of the recommendations listed in Resolution #2017-OXX, adopted Implementation of all the conditions of Etit 21the Staff Report dat f ugust Meet the architectural materials requirements of the pylon sign standards, including wrapping sign support pole with materials consistent with the building finishes. D. Applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the monument encroachment into the Chelsea Road right of way. E. Verify that the revised landscaping plan meets code requirements by providing quantity and size for existing landscaping and supplementing planting on site to meet code, if required. F. Demonstrate FAA review and approval for flagpole as required. G. Comply with the comments of the City Engineer per the checklist included with the staff report of July 11th, 2017 and letter dated July 171, 2017 6 193833v1 H. Developer shall execute and record a stormwater maintenance agreement. I. Location of the proposed RV dump stations is subject to the review and comment of the City Engineer relative to the location of existing municipal utilities and connections. Tanks must be located 12' from the property lines and may not encroach into drainage and utility easements. J. RV dump stations are not allowed to discharge into the City's sanitary sewer system and will be required to be pumped. Al its for RV d tations shall be obtained. r% All site lightin all comply wit ty of Monticello code requireme M. Applicant sha ter into a development agree t for the proposed ed unit development. N. The Develo all furnish the City with a cash security, or letter of c t, in the form attached hereto from a bank,"Securit n the amoullt of $ for gradin installation of site landscaping in compliance wi the approved Grading and Landscaping Pla O. The Developer shall pay the cost for the preparation of record construction drawings and City base map upgrading by the City Engineer as part of the Administrative / Engineering Fee. P. The Developer must obtain a sign permit from the City prior to installation of any signs for the development. 10. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. A. The Developer shall also furnish the City with a Security for $8,400.00 for grading in compliance with approved Plan "H". This amount was calculated as follows. $3,000/acre X 2.8 acres = $8,400.00 7 193833v1 GRADING/EROSION SECURITY: Erosion Control/Grading Certification $ 8,400.00 B. The amount of the security includes all of the security requirements set forth in the preceding sections of this Agreement, and was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Site Landscaping provide estimated landscaping costs X 125% SUB -TOTAL OTHER COSTS: Site Grading CONSTRUCTION $Developer to W $IF,400.00 C. this breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use oft curity. Th nk shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator, whi consent shall not be unreasonably withlWd. The security shall be for an automatically renewing term. Individual security instruments may The Fm rshorter terms prd�ided ay draw down tcur violatiorig the term the t least thirty (30) days prior teir (5 siness days' prior written no'ce to Amounts drawn shall not exceed t mounts necessary to cure to the default. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied in accordance with the Plans, the security shall be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed and all financial obligations to the City satisfied. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 8 193833v1 11. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Agreement which must be furnished to the City prior to release of the Plat for recording and execution of this Agreement by the City: City Engineering Expenses, escrow 3% Grading & Restoration City Administration Expenses, escrow Administration, Legal, Planning Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge . Water Trunk Charge Storm Sewer Charge (Base) Total Cash Requirements 31. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to he City that the co , state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, or or ronmentall regulations. If the City determines that th the lty may, at its option, reAse to allow consTruction st� ion or development woJ $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $9,284.80 $6,865.60 $9,920.40 $30,070.80 �pment complies with all city, lbdivision ordinances, zoning -velopment does not comply, in the Development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the Subject Property or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the Subject Property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Subject Property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. Any transfer of an ownership interest in the Subject Property is an assignment of the rights and obligations herein to the subsequent owner. 193833v1 Agreement. C. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Developer under this D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action t is Agreement shal1b, a waiveAite . De4per d the Citfficers, agents, and employees h ess from claims made by third parties, including but notother pro My owners, tenants, contractors, subcontractors, and materialmen, for dam4ageined, costs incurred or injuries ulting from the Developer's negligent, reckle or willful mihe De per will indemnify City and its officers, agents, and employees all costs, dxpenses, ncluding reasonabl engineering ering and attorney's fees, which t ity may pay or incur in consequence of such claim cept if in— —Y caused by City negligence, reckless or willful misconduct. G. In addition to all legal or equitable remedies, breach of any material term of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 10 193833v1 I. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the development, commercial general liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its contractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The insurance may be provided by a single policy or multiple policies including excess of or umbrella policies and shall have limits for bodily injury and death not less than $1,000,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $2,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an ad in 1tlona sured on the poFi cies, and thVeveloper shall e with the CiMencing coverage prior to the City releasing the Plat for record' g or isV ng any p 'ts. In the event the City has 40 not received this prior to the start of construction, the Developer shall halt all work until a certificate has been provided to 4 City. The City shall be listed as an shall provide that the City must be given advance Each right, power or remedy herein ad ' 'on to her right, power or remedy, express or im insured on all po 1 'es. The certificate the cancellation of the insurance. upon the City is cumulative and in orJreafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. The Developer will pay in full all invoices submitted to it by the City within sixty (60) days after receipt which reasonably evidence those costs incurred in the drafting, enforcement and supervision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering, planning, and attorney's fees. If the invoices are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work until the invoices are paid in full. Invoices not paid within sixty (60) days shall be subject to an eight percent (8%) per annum interest charge. 11 193833v1 L Developer shall be responsible for all snow removal from sidewalks and trails on developed and vacant lots and outlots to the extent that City Ordinance requires snow removal from the Subject Property. Developer shall be responsible for ensuring that all vacant lots comply with the City's Code regarding nuisances. intentionally left pages follow.] 12 193833v1 (SEAL) i Signature page to Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement ST OF MINNESOTA C TY OF WRIGHT The foregoing instrument , 20 , by of the City of Monticello, a Minne to the authority granted by its City i CITY OF MONTICELLO In Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator n lged before me this day of nd by Jeff O'Neill, Mayor and orporation, on behal the corpora Notary Public 13 193833v1 Signature page to Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement STATE OF COUN"' The fore oing instrument was 2017, by Brent Moody, the Chief Opi Minnesota limited liability company, c i� DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ DEVELOPER: FRHP LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC Brent Moody, Chief Operating and Legal Officer xledged before me this day of and Legal officer of FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC, a If of the limited liability company. 14 193833v1 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SPIRIT REALTY, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, fee owner of all or part of the Subject Property, more particularly described in the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement, does hereby join in, affirms and consents to the granting of the Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement. ST. CO Dated this day of , 2017. SPIRIT REALTY, L.P A Delaware limited partnership ■ - By: SPIRIT GENERAL OP HOLDINGS, LLC Its general partner a Delaware limited liability company IP Executive Vice President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Boyd Messmann, the Executive Vice President of Spirit General OP Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the general partner of Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 193833v1 LESSEE'S CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CWI, INC., a Kentucky corporation, which has a lease holder's interest in all or part of the Subject Property, more particularly described in the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement, pursuant to that certain Lease with Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, dated December 29, 2016, and said Memorandum of Lease dated December 29, 2016, recorded January 11, 2017, as Wright County Document No. A1334432, or good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, affirms and consents to the granting of the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement. Dated this day of , 2017. STATE OF ( ss. COUNTY OF CWI, Inc. A Kentucky corporation In Brent Moody, Chief Operating and Legal Officer The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Brent Moody, the Chief Operating and Legal officer of CWI, INC., a Kentucky corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 1938330 LESSEE'S CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CAMPING WORLD RV SALES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, which has a lease holder's interest in all or part of the Subject Property, more particularly described in the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement, pursuant to that certain Lease with Spirit Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, dated December 29, 2016, and said Memorandum of Lease dated December 29, 2016, recorded January 11, 2017, as Wright County Document No. A1334432, or good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, affirms and consents to the granting of the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and Conditional use Permit and Planned Unit Development Agreement. Dated this day of , 2017. STATE OF ( ss. COUNTY OF CAMPING WORLD RV SALES, LLC, A Minnesota limited liability company Brent Moody, Chief Operating and Legal Officer The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Brent Moody, the Chief Operating and Legal officer of Camping World RV Sales, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 1938330 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT TO: City of Monticello Dear Sir or Madam: No. _ Date: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2 , of (Name of Bank; b) Be accompanied by an affidavit signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello certifying that is in default of the Development Contract with the City of Monticello and that five (5) business days prior written notice has been given by the City to the Developer with respect to the existence of such default, and such default has not been cured. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank), on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. lm 193833vl Its CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE LIABILITY & WORKERS' COMPENSATION This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed below. PROJECT: CERTIFICATE HOLDER & ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Monticello ADDRESS: ARCH/ENGR: INSURED: ADDRESS: AGENT: ADDRESS: WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE—/—/ INSURANCE COMPANY: COVERAGE -Workers' Compensation, Statutory. Employers' Liability Limit $ Each Accident $ Disease Policy Limit $ ($500,000 Policy limit applies to both accident and disease) GENERAL LIABILITY EXPIRATION DATE Disease Employee Limit POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE / / EXPIRATION DATE INSURANCE COMPANY: ( )Claims Made ( )Occurrence ( )Owner's & Contractors Protective LIMITS: General Aggregate Limit (Other Than Products -Completed Operations) $ _ Products -Completed Operations Aggregate Limit $ Personal & Advertising Injury Limit $ Each Occurrence $ 193833v1 ( ) Other COVERAGE PROVIDED Operations of Contractor: Yes Operations of Sub -Contractor (Contingent): Yes Does Personal Injury Include Property Damage Liability Includes Claims Related to Employment: Yes Completed Operations/Products: Yes. Contractual Liability (Broad Form): Yes EXCEPTIONS: Damage Due to Collapse No Government Immunity is Waived Yes No. No Property Damage Liability Includes Damage Due to Blasting Yes No No Damage Due to Collapse Yes No No Damage To Underground Facilities Yes No No Broad Form Property Damage Yes No. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE: / / EXPIRATION DATE: INSURANCE COMPANY: ( )Any Auto ( )All Owned Autos ( )Hired Autos ( )Non -Owned Autos LIMITS: ( )Scheduled Autos Bodily Injury $ Each Person / $ Each Occurrence OR Combined Single Limit $ Property Damage $ Each Occurrence UMBRELLA EXCESS LIABILITY POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE:—/—/ EXPIRATION DATE: INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITS: Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage $ Each Occurrence $ Aggregate COVERAGE PROVIDED: Applies in excess of the coverages listed above for Employers' Liability, General Liability, and Automobile Liability: Yes No Are any deductibles applicable to bodily injury or property damage on any of the above coverages? Yes No If So, List Amount $ AGENT CARRIES ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE: Yes No Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 days' notice to the parties to whom this certificate is issued. Dated at: MN License # Authorized Insurance Representative 193833vl On: IM IU [I] 497111ff.T" Do : [I] WWWOM\ly 0Ie11 I TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT , a , which holds a mortgage on the on the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development, agrees that the Development Contract and Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgages. Dated this day of , 2017. STATE OF COUNTY OF By: Its And: Its )ss. [print name] [print name] The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by and the and River, a national banking association, on behalf of the bank. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 1938330 of First national Bank of Elk LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT is made, executed and entered into this day of , 2017, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota ("City") and FRHP Lincolnshire/dba CAMPING WORLD ("Camping World"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City is the owner of a certain tract of undeveloped land ("Property") WHEREAS, "Camping World" desires to obtain a license over and across the Property to use a portion of the Property for the purpose of a commercial monument sign (the "Improvements") to their residence that abuts the Property. WHEREAS, the City is amenable to the granting of the license hereinafter set forth, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter described. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the payment of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration to the City in hand paid, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and upon mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. The City does hereby grant to "Camping World" a non-exclusive, non- transferable license to construct, maintain, and utilize the Improvements over and across the Property legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to and by reference made a part of this License Agreement: Exhibit "A" - Legal description of Property. Exhibit `B" - Depiction of Improvements. Exhibit "C" - Description of permitted uses. 3. Premises to be Used. The City agrees to allow "Camping World" to construct/install the Improvements on a portion of the Property as depicted in Exhibit `B". The design and construction of the Improvements may be modified by the City at any time for safety reasons. The legal description of the Property is attached as Exhibit "A". 4. Construction. "Camping World" shall be obligated at its sole cost and expense to construct/install the Improvements in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations. 5. Conditions. The City and "Camping World" agree that "Camping World" will use the Property subject to the following conditions: 105061 A. "Camping World" acknowledges that "Camping World" has inspected the Property and is fully satisfied with its physical condition and agrees to accept the Property in its present "as is" condition. Neither the City nor any representative of the City has made any warranties or representations upon which "Camping World" relies with respect to the physical condition of the Property. B. "Camping World" accepts the Property subject to such conditions, restrictions, and limitations, if any, that presently appear of record in regard to the Property. C. "Camping World" accepts the Property subject to any applicable health, life, safety, fire, or zoning ordinances, codes, regulations or statutes of the City, the County of Wright, the State of Minnesota, or any other governmental body now existing or which may hereinafter exist by reason of any legal authority during the term of this License Agreement. D. "Camping World" accepts the Property and is satisfied as to the boundary lines and contents of its premises and likewise satisfied with the sufficiency of the present title of the City. 6. Term. The term of this License Agreement shall be for five (5) years and will begin on the 14th day of August, and will end on the 31 st day of July, both dates inclusive, unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided. ("Initial Term".) Thereafter, this License Agreement shall renew automatically, for five year periods ("Renewal Terms"), until either party terminates the License Agreement by giving the other party ninety (90) days advance written notice. 7. Termination. The City may immediately terminate the conditions of the License Agreement if, in the sole discretion of the City, the Property is deemed to be unsafe or the City should require the use of the Property. In the event the City terminates the License Agreement because of safety concerns, "Camping World" shall forfeit their interest in its entirety and comply with the requirements set forth in Section 16 when vacating the premises. 8. Use. "Camping World" use of the Property is non-exclusive. "Camping World" may use the Property during the term of this License Agreement for the nonexclusive uses set forth in Exhibit "C." 9. Repair and Maintenance. The City and "Camping World" agree that "Camping World" will be responsible for any and all repair and maintenance of the Improvements to the Property during the term of this License Agreement. Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, keeping the Property clean of snow, litter or trash. The City shall be allowed unrestricted access to the Property for any purpose including, but not limited to, maintaining or installing utilities on the Property. 10. Indemnification. "Camping World" agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City from and against all liability, damages, penalties, judgments, or claims of whatever nature arising from injury to person or property sustained by anyone arising out of Camping World" use and occupancy of the Property and will at "Camping World" own cost and expense defend any and 112013 2 all suits or actions (just or unjust) which may be brought against the City or in which the City may be impleaded with others upon any such above-mentioned matter, claim, or claims. This indemnification in no way limits "Camping World" obligation to maintain a blanket or other general liability insurance policy for the benefit of the City. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement will include indemnity against all costs, expenses, and liabilities incurred in or in connection with any such claims or proceedings brought thereon and the defense thereof. 11. Liability Insurance. "Camping World" will, at "Camping World" sole cost and expense, provide and maintain during the term of this License Agreement a blanket or general liability insurance policy against claims for personal injury, death, or property damage occurring in connection with the use and occupancy of the Property, said policy will have limits of not less than One Million and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit. 12. Requirement for All Insurance. All insurance policies (or riders) required by this License Agreement will be (i) taken out by "Camping World" and maintained with responsible insurance companies organized under the laws of one of the states of the United States and qualified to do business in the State of Minnesota, (ii) will contain a provision that the insurer will not cancel or revise coverage thereunder without giving written notice to "Camping World" as an insured party and to the City as an additional insured at least thirty (30) days before cancellation or revision becomes effective, (iii) will name "Camping World" as an insured party and "City of Monticello" as an additional insured, (iv) will be in accordance with specifications approved by the City Administrator for the City, and (v) will be evidenced by a Certificate of Insurance listing "City of Monticello" as an additional insured which will be filed with the City. 13. Assignment and Subletting. "Camping World" will not by operation of law or otherwise assign or sublet or permit the Property as depicted and described in this License Agreement to be used by others without the City's prior written consent in each instance. 14. Default. If "Camping World" at any time defaults in the observance of any of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this License Agreement, including any exhibits thereto, the City will immediately notify "Camping World" of "Camping World" failure to observe such terms, covenants, and conditions. Upon such notice being given by the City, this License Agreement will wholly cease and terminate and "Camping World" will have no rights or interests whatsoever to further use or occupy the Property. The City may reenter and recover possession of the Property either with the consent and cooperation of "Camping World" or, if such consent and cooperation are withheld, may recover possession thereof and reenter in the manner prescribed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 566 on Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer, as such Chapter may be amended, supplemented, or replaced from time to time, with the City thereby being entitled to such rents, costs, and attorney's fees as allowed by law. 15. Surrender of Possession. "Camping World" agrees that at the expiration or cancellation of this License Agreement, "Camping World" will yield up possession of the Property together with all improvements to the Property in a good, operable fashion. Upon surrendering possession of the Property, "Camping World" agrees to remove all personal property belonging to "Camping World". 112013 16. Successors and Assigns. The City and "Camping World" agree that this License Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto in accordance with the terms and conditions of this License Agreement and any statutes, regulations, ordinances, or city code provisions applicable thereto. 17. Written Notices or Other Correspondence. Any written notice or other correspondence to be provided by and between the City and "Camping World" in accordance with this License Agreement will be either hand delivered or mailed by registered or certified mail to the following addresses: CITY: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 CAMPING WORLD: 18. Waiver of Default. Any waiver by the City of a default under the provisions of this License Agreement by will not operate or be construed as a waiver of a subsequent default by "Camping World". No waiver will be valid unless in writing and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk on behalf of the City. 19. Invalidity of Provisions. If any term or provision of this License Agreement or any application hereof to any person or circumstance is to any extent found to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this License Agreement or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable will not be effected thereby and each term and provision of this License Agreement will be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 20. Entire Agreement. This instrument herein contains the entire and only agreement between the parties and no oral statements or representations or prior written matter not contained in this instrument will have any force and effect. This License Agreement cannot be modified in any way except by writing executed by both parties. 21. Governing Law. This License Agreement will be governed exclusively by the provisions hereof and by the laws of the State of Minnesota, as the same from time to time exists. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF MONTICELLO 112013 4 By: Mayor By: City Administrator By: Its: THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 MKB 112013 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description To be provided by applicant. 98111 EXHIBIT "B" Depiction of Premises and Location of Property To be provided be applicant. 98111 EXHIBIT "C" Use of Premises For use and maintenance of a commercial monument sign. City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 2J. Consideration of annroving an amendment to the annroved conditions for simple subdivision for Patricia Olson. (NAC/AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Earlier this spring, Patricia Olson applied for a subdivision of her property at the following location: Legal: Lots 6 and 7, Block F, Monticello (original plat) Address: 224 Yd Street East, Monticello, MN The Planning Commission considered the application at its June 2nd meeting, forwarding a recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the City Council. The City Council approved the subdivision at its June 22nd Council meeting on its consent agenda. The original staff report recommended, as a part of its Exhibit Z conditions, that two existing structures be moved to other locations, as they would result in encroachments over the new property line being created as a result of the subdivision. The two structures, shown on the applicant's survey, are a play structure that lies on both sides of the proposed boundary line, and a clothesline, the posts for which appear to be directly abutting the new property line, and are almost certain to extend across the line as a part of the upper portion of the structure. In a review meeting staff, the applicant and a family member representative discussed the staff recommendation. The applicant indicated that she did not wish to move these items, but the accompanying family member indicated that they could do so if required. Neither the applicant nor the family member spoke during the Planning Commission meeting. As such, the staff recommendation was adopted by the Planning Commission, and then by the City Council as a part of its approval of the subdivision on the consent agenda. Subsequently, the applicant has raised concerns with the conditions requiring removal of the encroaching structures. She is seeking a revised City Council approval, deleting the subject conditions. It is staff's position that the encroachments could potentially create title issues for the applicant and could interfere with conveyance of the property either now or in the future. Moreover, similar conditions have been made of previous subdivisions, and compliance with all zoning requirements are a condition of the exception to the requirement for a full plat: Section 152.007 (2) Division of one previously platted parcel into no more than two buildable parcels, both of which will be in full conformance with all applicable zoning regulations, and for which no public right- of -way, easements, or other drainage concerns are evident to the Zoning Administrator. Nonetheless, if the City Council agrees that the encroachment condition should be removed from the subdivision approval, a revised Resolution is provided as an exhibit to this supplemental report. Staff has noted in the resolution that the applicant should provide written verification with a title company that the remaining encroachments will not interfere with recording and conveyance of the parcel(s) in question. EDA Agenda: 11/18/15 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the amended conditions of approval for the simple subdivision for 224 3rd Street East. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the modified conditions for the subdivision. The Council previously approved the simple subdivision based on findings that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The modifications to the conditions address the applicant's concern, while addressing the potential for conveyance issues due to the encroachments. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2020-53 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Site Survey E. City Engineer's Comment Letter, dated May 2W', 2020 Z. Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT Z (revised) Simple Subdivision 224 Yd Street East Lots 6 and 7, Block F, Monticello (original plat) Amended conditions of approval for the proposed Simple Subdivision: I The play stmetwe will need to be r-emoved or- moved to eomply with the City's sethaek of six feet ftem the side a -ad r-eaf- pr-epei4-f lines, a -ad 20 feet fr-em the right of way along Palm Street. 2. The twe existing eleths line peles that will be abutting the side pr-epeAy line shall be movedto eomply with t —11' 'baek of six feet ftom the side and r -ear- pr-opel4y line�, and 20 feet ffem the right ef way aleng Palm Street. Altema ively, the eiese line ean removed eompletely. 1. Provide a legal description of required easements for recording. 2. The applicant provides written title verification that the remaining structure encroachments will not interfere with recording or conveyance of the resulting parcels. 3. In the event the County rejects the descriptions of the metes and bounds subdivision, the applicant will need to re -apply and utilize a formal plat process. 4. Payment of any applicable trunk fee or other fees resulting from the subdivision including, but not limited to sewer, water, and stormwater. 5. A required park dedication fee shall be paid by the applicant if it is determined that this fee has not yet been paid. 6. Compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer regarding easements, grading, drainage, and utilities. 7. Recommendations of other staff and Planning Commission, as applicable 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2020-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO APPROVING REVISED CONDITIONS FOR THE SIMPLE SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK F, MONTICELLO (ORIGINAL PLAT) WHEREAS, the applicant is the owner of two parcels of Lots 6 and 7, Block F, Monticello (original plat); and WHEREAS, the subject property is currently combined s a single parcel; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to re -subdivide the s t parcel into two lots for the purpose of conveying one parcel, wi an existing residenti cture, to a third party; and WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R- , and the proposed ill continue to meet the applicable zoning requirements; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdi ' ' n qualifie r a simple subdivision process under the terms of the Monticello Sub v1 dinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Com sion c sidered the mer at its regular meeting on June 2" d, 2020, and the applicant and members of the public e provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the comments of the Planning Commission and staff report and approved t\toval. on on June 22nd, 2020; and WHEREAS, sub the City Council has received comments from the applicant relating to the roved on June 22nd, 2020 related to property line encroachments; and WHEREAS, the City Council has on July 13th, 2020 considered an amendment to those conditions, and .4 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision creates lots that will continue to meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed subdivision qualifies as a "simple subdivision" under the terms of the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance for purposes of processing. 4. The proposed subdivision will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the proposed subdivision is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the amended conditions found in Exhibit Z of the staff report on the matter, as follows: 1. Provide a legal description of required drainage and utility easements for recording. 2. In the event the County rejects the descriptions of the metes and bounds subdivision, the applicant will need to re -apply and utilize a formal plat process. 3. The applicant provides written title verification that the remaining structure encroachments will not interfere with recording or conveyance of the resulting parcels. 4. Payment of any applicable trunk fee or other fees resulting from the subdivision including, but not limited to sewer, water, and stormwat 5. A required park dedication fee shall be paid by the applican is determined that this fee has not yet been paid. 6. Reapportionment of applicable levied special assessments. 7. Compliance with the requ' nts of the City Engineer regarding eas nts, grading, drainage, and utilities. 8. Recommendations of other staff and Planning Commission, as applicable. W ADOPTED t ' of July, 2020, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk 2 Brian Stumpf, Mayor Patricia Olson I Request for Simple Subdivision Created by: City of Monticello Legal: Lots 6&7, Block F Original Plat of Monticello I P I D: 155-010-071060 Jacob Thunander From: Patricia Olson Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 9:18 AM To: Jacob Thunander Subject: Re: Land Use Application Good morning Jacob, It's quite simple, not sure why I had to do all this. I currently have a family that rents the house, have been there since 2001. At the 224 E. 3rd St. location They want to purchase the house. But as it stands, it is tied into 2 lots. I simply wanted to know where the lot line is for just the house, since they do not want to buy both lots. And I don't want to sell the lot in between the house located at 224 E. 3rd St and 212 E. 3rd St. I want this recorded as 3 separate lots. Actually just know where the lot ends for 224, for no other reason but to sell them the house and lot that it sits on. If you have any more questions, you can contact me by email or by phone Thank you for reaching out and helping me with this process. Patricia Olson -----Original Message ----- From: Jacob Thunander <Jacob.Thunander@ci.monticello.mn.us> To: Cc: Angela Schumann <Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us> Sent: Mon, May 4, 2020 12:19 pm Subject: Land Use Application Patricia, Thank you very much for submitting a Land Use Application for 224 E 3rd Street, Monticello. Would you be able to write a short narrative explaining your proposed lot split information and anything relevant that would help the City as they review the application? Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Jacob Thunander Community and Economic Development Coordinator City of Monticello http://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/ 763-271-3206 Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government office is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and may be disclosed to third parties. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED: Lots Shu and Seven of Block 'F* In IM Towrsite of Monticello, according to Uv plat by John O. Haven an file and of "cod In the office of the register of deeds of said Wright County, Minnesota. NOTES: 1) This survey was performed without the beneM of a title commitment. There may or may not be easements encumbering or bermeflOkmg the subject: properly. The legal description as shown hereon was obtained from Document No. 703132. 2) Benchmark: Top no of tin hydrant located in the noritonst quadrant of the Intersection of Palm Street and 3rd Srnel East as shown hereon. Elevation- 929.92 feet (NAW 19M datum) 3) Overall Ana: 21826± SgFt 0.50t Acres Area of Forest A: 10963± SgFt 0.251 ides Area d Forest B: 10963± SgFt 0.253 Aeras 4) Gopher one d - Ticket No. 200991449. Location of utilities W Wng on or serving the surveyed property as determined by observed evidence and nes kh s by utility compares and other appropriate sources (an above hrnon), sublet to this following metc5one. A. utility operations do nes consistently respond to loeats requests though the Gopher State Ons Call service for boundary purposes such as fids. B. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REOUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT (661) 464.0002. C. The seed location of underground features cannot be accurately depicted without eaeavistion or 'potholing. 5) Curr Zonirhg: R-2 Single and Tido Family Residential Setbacks: Front - 30 feet or "Block Average' Interior gide - 6 feet Street Side - 20 feat Rear - 30 fest PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OF PARCEL A: Lot 7, Block F, TownsUe of Monticello, according to the recorded Phil by John O. Haven thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OF PARCEL B: Lot S. Block F. Townstls of Montloetio, accading to Us recorded Plat by Jon O. Haven U»rsol. Wright County. Minnesota. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY w.s r P � f \ F7P 12043 P r� / / a7. / 0272 / 40 ere i / Edge of BNerarmois 0dveway----•. i / yam. 28 ! Li T 8 i JY ! � % lilll ! No. PARCELA x10963 34RR rr i " \ / MAIrV llaoaok Luo aI / Cower sai m ! --Char Un k Faros ,� fwdwwobw p Wood Fends- •�•., / / \ 1 lam XV !/ LOT 3 W11 craw . \ Xa" onyx XMA / I LEGEND 0 Found bon Monument O Set Iron Monument 1141226 O Gas Meter m Water Geta Valve IN Utility Pedestal -O- Parer Pole CE Electric Meter ® Sanitary Sealer Manhole C' Storm Sewer Manhole iB Curb Stop b Fire Hydrant ❑ Catch Basin x Spot Elevation (-j Dec lupus Tree and Size PIP Found bol Pipe T— TMephona/Cable Line G Gas Line > — Sanitay Sewer lime —> —> —> —> - Storm Sewer Line W— Wetemmain Lkro _.. _ CLIENT: PROJECT LOCATION: rrenoyceray avasas•vrvls Pon, aSpon coos 375 SPRUCE AVENUE NORTH tin t ea a able t r .W Larded ym undo as �� TrH aavtSloNs ceatea by: GEw x. WEBS °apse° iaserrodernnanalavavWrand PROJECT NUMBER: 20036 P.O. BOX 323 Patricia Olson -4 ► 212E 3rd Street PID NO: 155010071060 taaeefasaWilamarrr. No. DwTt ail SURVEYING 1.1,C MAPLE LAKE, MN 55358 f� I c 320-401-1118 Monticello, MN 55362 224 3rd Street E cherlr E. Webb. Jr. SHEET: t OF 1 Monticello, MN 55362 ±Joan.. No. 412M CITY OF Mont C o May 20, 2020 Re: Olson Lot Split City Project # 2020-015 OFFICE: 763-295-2711 FAX: 763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street Suite 11 Monticello, MN 55362 The Engineering Department has reviewed the survey dated 04/16/2020 as prepared Webb Surveying and offers the following comments: General Comments 1. Please add drainage and utility easements to survey and provide legal descriptions for the easements. The subdivision ordinance requires "(C) Width and location. An easement for drainage and utilities at least six feet wide shall be provided along each side line of each lot and an easement of 12 feet wide shall be provided along the front and rear line of each lot." 2. A proposed grading and drainage plan will be required for lot 7 at the time of development. The City is not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please contact the Engineering Department with any questions. Sincerely, Ryan Melhouse Engineering Technician www.ci.monticeIIo.mn.us City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 2K. Consideration of renewing a letter of agreement with Xcel Energy for emergency response to the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (DK) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Monticello Emergency Management Department is requesting City Council to renew the agreement that allows emergency response to the plant. This agreement outlines how the fire, public works, and emergency management departments respond to emergencies at the plant. It also discusses the duties of the PIO (Public Information Officer). This agreement is renewed every three years. There were only minor changes to the agreement. There is a copy of the changes and explanation for each attached. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: None B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the letter of agreement with Xcel Energy for emergency response to Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommend Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Copy of Letter of Agreement B. Changes LETTER OF AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA AND NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY FOR THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES TO THE MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Pursuant to the terms of this Letter of Agreement ("Agreement"), the City of Monticello, Minnesota (City), the Fire Department of the City of Monticello ("Fire Department"), and Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation ("NSPM") (together, "Parties," and each a "Party"), agree to provide emergency response services to the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ("MNGP") as follows: The Parties will respond to an incident at MNGP consistent with requirements outlined in Xcel Energy Offsite Nuclear Emergency Plan, Document No. FP -EP -PLAN -1, Rev. 9 (08/07/2019) ("Offsite Plan") and the Monticello Emergency Plan, Rev. 53 (03/26/2019) ("Monticello Plan") (together, "Plans") and any revisions to the Plans, provided that NSPM provides a copy of the revised Plans to the City and Fire Department within 30 days of the date of the revised Plans. 2. Each Party has reviewed the Plans and understands its responsibilities pursuant to the Plans. The Parties have equipment, agreements and procedures to respond to an emergency at MNGP and are prepared to and will respond to a request for assistance as set forth in the Plans. 3. The Parties have mutually adopted and agree to use the Emergency Action Levels as specified in the Plans. 4. The Parties agree that they will respond to a Hostile Action Based (HAB) event consistent with the terms of the MNGP Radiological Emergency Preparedness Hostile Action Based Events Plan Supplement adopted by the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM). 5. The Fire Department will provide fire and rescue service to MNGP. The Fire Department will coordinate with other local fire departments to the extent necessary and consistent with the Plans. If the Fire Department requires assistance to respond to an event at MNGP, include a HAB event, the Fire Department will be supplemented by resources available to the Fire Department pursuant to the North Suburban Mutual Aid Agreement and the Minnesota Fire and Rescue Mutual Aid Plan. The Parties will ensure that the agencies called upon to assist participate in the training, exercises and drills required under the Plans for these agencies. The Fire Department will be the lead fire agency for all emergencies in the City of Monticello. For a HAB event, the Fire Department will deploy a representative to the Incident Command Post dependent upon type, location, and scope of the incident, once scene safety is established. 6. The MNGP Fire Brigade Leader will work with the Fire Department Leader to provide local coordination of firefighting and non -firefighting activities. Non -firefighting tasks may Page 1 of 3 include actions such as spraying water to contain radiological releases or directing water to plant locations for refilling/cooling purposes. In all cases, such operations may begin only when the radiological and security threats are mitigated to ensure the safety of both plant personnel and fire fighters. 7. The Monticello Public Works Department, in coordination with the Wright County Sheriff and County Engineering Department, will control traffic out of and into effected areas to the extent feasible and consistent with the MNGP Plan. 8. The City has agreements in place to call upon resources of other agencies to assist in the response to a HAB event. 9. The City shall designate personnel to facilitate communication between the responding organizations, members of the media, and the general public. Authorized individuals are the Public Information Officer, the City of Monticello Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Emergency Manager, and City Administrator. 10. NSPM will respond to an emergency at MNGP as outlined in the Plans. NSPM will support emergency response services provided by the City and the Fire Department, and all other law enforcement and emergency services providers, including providing training, drills and exercises. The City and Fire Department agree to participate in the training, drills and exercises. 11. NSPM shall ensure prompt access to MNGP to the Fire Department and other City emergency response personnel in accordance with plant procedures. 12. This Agreement shall become effective on the date of the last signature by the authorized representatives of the Parties. The Agreement may be amended with mutual consent of the Parties. Any party may withdraw from the Agreement by providing one hundred twenty (120) days' written notice of intent to withdraw from the Agreement to the other party. Agreed to: Brian Stumpf Mayor City of Monticello Date Dan Klein Date Fire Marshal / Emergency Manager City of Monticello Page 2of3 Mike Mossey Fire Chief City of Monticello Date Thomas A. Conboy Date Site Vice President Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Page 3of3 LETTER OF AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA AND NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY FOR THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES TO THE MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Pursuant to the terms of this Letter of Agreement ("Agreement"), the City of Monticello, Minnesota (City), the Fire Department of the City of Monticello ("Fire Department"), and Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation ("NSPM") (together, "Parties," and standardizeeach a "Party"), agree to provide emergency response services to the Monticello Nuclear language Generating Plant ("MNGP") as follows: The Parties will respond to an incident at MNGP consistent with requirements outlined in Xcel Energy Offsite Nuclear Emergency Plan, Document No. FP -EP -PLAN -1, Rev. 9 updated (08/07/2019) ("Offsite Plan") and the Monticello Emergency Plan, Rev. 53 (03/26/2019yevisions ("Monticello Plan") (together, "Plans") and any revisions to the Plans, provided that NSPM provides a copy of the revised Plans to the City and Fire Department within 30 days of the date of the revised Plans. 2. Each Party has reviewed the Plans and understands its responsibilities pursuant to the Plans. The Parties have equipment, agreements and procedures to respond to an emergency at MNGP and are prepared to and will respond to a request for assistance as set forth in the Plans. New sentence 3. The Parties have mutually adopted and agree to use the Emergency Action Levels as specified in the Plans. Previously part of paragraph 2. 4. The Parties agree that they will respond to a Hostile Action Based (HAB) event consistent with the terms of the MNGP Radiological Emergency Preparedness Hostile Action Based Events Plan Supplement adopted by the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM). 5. The Fire Department will provide fire and rescue service to MNGP. The Fire Department will coordinate with other local fire departments to the extent necessary and consistent with the Plans. If the Fire Department requires assistance to respond to an event at MNGP, include a HAB event, the Fire Department will be supplemented by resources available to the Fire Department pursuant to the North Suburban Mutual Aid Agreement and the Minnesota Fire and Rescue Mutual Aid Plan. The Parties will ensure that the agencies called upon to assist participate in the training, exercises and drills required under the Plans for these agencies. The Fire Department will be the lead fire agency for all emergencies in the City of Monticello. For a HAB event, the Fire Department will deploy a representative to the Incident Command Post dependent upon type, location, and scope of the incident, once scene safety is established. 6. The MNGP Fire Brigade Leader will work with the Fire Department Leader to provide local coordination of firefighting and non -firefighting activities. Non -firefighting tasks may Page 1 of 3 include actions such as spraying water to contain radiological releases or directing water to plant locations for refilling/cooling purposes. In all cases, such operations may begin only when the radiological and security threats are mitigated to ensure the safety of both plant personnel and fire fighters. 7. The Monticello Public Works Department, in coordination with the Wright County Sheriff and County Engineering Department, will control traffic out of and into effected areas to the extent feasible and consistent with the MNGP Plan. 8. The City has agreements in place to call upon resources of other agencies to assist in the response to a HAB event. 9. The City shall designate personnel to facilitate communication between the responding organizations, members of the media, and the general public. Authorized individuals are the Public Information Officer, the City of Monticello Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Emergency Manager, and City Administrator. Paragraph 9 wording changed to reflect addition of PIO position. 10. NSPM will respond to an emergency at MNGP as outlined in the Plans. NSPM will support emergency response services provided by the City and the Fire Department, and all other law enforcement and emergency services providers, including providing training, drills and exercises. The City and Fire Department agree to participate in the training, drills and exercises. 11. NSPM shall ensure prompt access to MNGP to the Fire Department and other City emergency response personnel in accordance with plant procedures. Removed word "withdrawal" 12. This Agreement shall become effective on the date of the last signature by the authorized representatives of the Parties. The Agreement may be amended with mutual consent of the Parties. Any party may withdraw from the Agreement by providing one hundred twenty (120) days' written notice of intent to withdraw from the Agreement to the other party. Added numerical form of 120 Removedysentence "The agreement shall continue in full force and effect for all other Parties that have not submitted a notice of intent to withdraw from the Agreement" Agreed to: Brian Stumpf Date Mayor City of Monticello Signatures updated to new personnel. Dan Klein Date Fire Marshal / Emergency Manager City of Monticello Page 2of3 Mike Mossey Fire Chief City of Monticello Date Thomas A. Conboy Date Site Vice President Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Page 3of3 City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 2L. Consideration to approve a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 728 square foot residential detached Accessory Building — Maior in an R-1 (Single -Family Residence) District. Applicant: Kevin & Sara Haman (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 7, Block 4, Groveland Second Address: 10051 Prescott Drive, Monticello, MN Planning Case Number: 2020-016 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for a garage space exceeding 1,200 square feet total. Deadline for Decision: July 20, 2020 (120 days: September 18, 2020) Land Use Designation: Places to Live Zoning Designation: R-1 Single Family Residence District The purpose of the "R-1" single family district is to provide for low density, single family, detached residential dwelling units and directly related complementary uses. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: N/A Current Site Use: Single-family home with attached garage Surrounding Land Uses: North: R-1 Single -Family Residence District East: R-1 Single -Family Residence District South: R-1 Single -Family Residence District West: A -O Agricultural Open Space District Project Description: The applicants are proposing to construct a detached garage on the rear of the property located at 10051 Prescott Drive. The new garage will be 26' x 28' for a total of 728 square feet. The property has an existing single-family home and an attached 690 square foot garage. The total square footage for the garage spaces will be 1,418 square feet. 1 City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 ANALYSIS Zoning. The subject site is zoned R-1 Single -Family Residence District. Within the R-1 district, detached garages are an allowed accessory use. Setbacks. The following table illustrates that the proposed accessory building will meet the required setbacks: Lot Area and Width. The subject site is approximately 17,280 square feet in area; has a lot width of approximately 80 feet. This exceeds the standards for the R-1 district. Easements. The subject site has a six-foot drainage and utility easement along the side property line; and a 12 -foot easement along the rear property line. The proposed garage will not encroach into the easements. Maximum Building Height. The maximum accessory building height in the R-1 district is 15 feet as measured to the mean height of a pitched roof. The proposed building has a height of 14 feet 11 3/8 inches to the mean spot on the roof. The accessory building height is compliant with the City's standards. Building Type and Design. The applicants have submitted a narrative stating that the building will use a gray vinyl siding to match the existing home, or a darker gray vinyl to complement the existing home. No brick is proposed. As a condition of approval, the materials used to finish the garage must match the existing home in material type and color. Staff would recommend that a matching brick wainscot be used. Site Lighting. The building plans that have been submitted do not show any exterior lighting. As a condition of approval, staff is recommending that any exterior lighting be added to the structure only such that it does not glare onto adjoining property. Landscaping / Site Restoration. The applicants have not submitted a landscaping / site restoration plan. As a condition of approval, the disturbed areas of the site shall be seeded or sodded within one year of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Curb Cut Access. The applicants are not proposing to make any changes to the curb cut access or driveway areas. Grading and Drainage Plan. The pitched roof will direct stormwater to the north and south of the structure. As a condition of approval, the City Engineer shall review the plans to ensure proper drainage of the site; the applicants shall adhere to any follow up recommendations by the City Engineer. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit application requires that the City find that conditions can be established to ensure that all of the following criteria will always be met: 2 Required Propos d Compliant Front Yard Behind Principal Building Behind Principal Building Yes Side Yard north 6 feet 6 feet Yes Side Yard south 6 feet > 6 feet Yes Rear Yard 6 feet 12 feet Yes Lot Area and Width. The subject site is approximately 17,280 square feet in area; has a lot width of approximately 80 feet. This exceeds the standards for the R-1 district. Easements. The subject site has a six-foot drainage and utility easement along the side property line; and a 12 -foot easement along the rear property line. The proposed garage will not encroach into the easements. Maximum Building Height. The maximum accessory building height in the R-1 district is 15 feet as measured to the mean height of a pitched roof. The proposed building has a height of 14 feet 11 3/8 inches to the mean spot on the roof. The accessory building height is compliant with the City's standards. Building Type and Design. The applicants have submitted a narrative stating that the building will use a gray vinyl siding to match the existing home, or a darker gray vinyl to complement the existing home. No brick is proposed. As a condition of approval, the materials used to finish the garage must match the existing home in material type and color. Staff would recommend that a matching brick wainscot be used. Site Lighting. The building plans that have been submitted do not show any exterior lighting. As a condition of approval, staff is recommending that any exterior lighting be added to the structure only such that it does not glare onto adjoining property. Landscaping / Site Restoration. The applicants have not submitted a landscaping / site restoration plan. As a condition of approval, the disturbed areas of the site shall be seeded or sodded within one year of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Curb Cut Access. The applicants are not proposing to make any changes to the curb cut access or driveway areas. Grading and Drainage Plan. The pitched roof will direct stormwater to the north and south of the structure. As a condition of approval, the City Engineer shall review the plans to ensure proper drainage of the site; the applicants shall adhere to any follow up recommendations by the City Engineer. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit application requires that the City find that conditions can be established to ensure that all of the following criteria will always be met: 2 City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 (i) The conditional use will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Staff Comment: The conditional use is expected to increase property values for the applicant as well as neighboring property. (ii) The conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working near the use. Staff Comment: The accessory structure will be constructed according to building code and not endanger persons or property in the area. (iii) The conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property for permitted uses predominant in the area. Staff Comment: With the exception of the area to the west, the surrounding area is fully developed. The area to the west is accessible from other rights-of-way in the area. (iv) The conditional use will not pose an undue burden on public utilities or roads, and adequate sanitary facilities are provided. Staff Comment: The proposed garage will presumably have electricity and no running water / sewer. The project is not expected to have an impact on utilities or roads. (v) The conditional use can provide adequate parking and loading spaces, and all storage on the site can be done in conformance with City code requirements. Staff Comment: No parking or loading space is proposed. (vi) The conditional use will not result in any nuisance including but not limited to odor, noise, or sight pollution. Staff Comment: The garage will not create any odors or noise. The garage will be located in the rear corner of the property and will have minimal visibility from the street. (vii) The conditional use will not unnecessarily impact natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, and shorelines; and all erosion will be properly controlled. Staff Comment: No impact to natural features is expected with this project. (viii) The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined in Chapter 5 for the proposed use. StaffComment: In review of the remaining provisions of Chapter 5, the project will be compliant with the City's requirements. Accessory Building CUP Requirements. In addition to the requirements above, the zoning ordinance also lays out the following criteria for accessory structures: (i) Size Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.3(D)(2)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: 3 City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 a. 1,200 square feet; or b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. Staff Comment: Because the garage is greater than 1,200 square feet and exceeds the footprint of the home, a CUP has been applied for. 2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section 5.3(D)(2)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: a. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. Staff Comment: The applicant has stated in their narrative that the garage will be used for storage of personal property. As a condition of approval, no commercial business will be allowed in the new garage or existing garage. b. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. StaffComment: The lot is 0.24 acres and is pie shaped with the backyard being larger than the front yard. The backyard area is of sufficient size to accommodate this accessory structure. C. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. Staff Comment: The new garage will be 728 square feet. Staff feels that this is not an unreasonable size that it will impact surrounding properties. d. The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. Staff Comment: The applicant has stated their intent to provide lapped siding similar to the principal building in compliance with this requirement. In similar applications, the City has applied a requirement that includes brick or stone front materials, to match the existing home. The applicant suggests that the front of the structure will have some visibility, although limited, from the street. The City has waived the brick requirement only when the building is not visible. Although visibility is limited, this requirement should apply as it has for similar applications. This will also be a condition of approval. Planning Commission Review & Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed and held a public hearing on this item during their regular meeting on July 7th, 2020. During the public hearing, the applicant clarified that the siding color for the proposed structure may not be an exact match to the shade of grey for the home siding, due to the age of the home siding. Staff indicated that the ordinance requires major accessory structures to be constructed to an architecturally similar style and appearance and that some slight variation may be accommodated. The applicant further indicated that as C! City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 the visibility of the garage from the street will be limited, their preference is not to install the required brick or stone. The existing homes does include brick on the facade. They had no issues with the other conditions in Exhibit Z. No other public was present to address the Commission on the item. The Commission discussed the conditions related to the siding color and brick coverage requirements. While the Commission has some inclination not to require the brick, it was recognized as a code requirement and no variance had been requested. As such, the Commission's motion for recommendation included a modified set of conditions which would allow some flexibility in plantings or architectural treatments to meet the conditions. Following the discussion, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the CUP. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval, Alternative #1, with amended conditions from the original staff report. 1. Motion to approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit for Detached Accessory Building — Major at 10051 Prescott Drive, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of this report and based on findings in Resolution PC -2020-019. 2. Motion to deny. 3. Motion to table action. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on staff review of the plans submitted by Kevin and Sara Haman dated March 30, 2020, planning staff recommends approval of said plans with the conditions as listed in Exhibit Z. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2020-019 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Site Survey E. Building Elevations F. Building Floor Plans Z. Conditions of Approval 5 City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit for Garage 10051 Prescott Drive Lot 7, Block 4, Groveland 211 Addition AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION The exterior materials used to finish the accessory structure must be similar and/or coordinating to the existing home in material type and color, including a wainscot treatment of brick similar to that of the principal building front or additional landscaping to screen the view of the structure. Original condition: The exterior materials used to finish the accessory structure must match the existing home in material type and color, including a wainscot treatment of brick similar to that of the principal building front. 2. No exterior lighting be attached to the garage that will glare onto adjoining property. 3. The disturbed areas of the site shall be seeded or sodded within one (1) calendar year of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 4. The City Engineer review the plans and address any drainage concerns. The applicants shall adhere to any follow up recommendations by the City Engineer. 5. The applicant is responsible for any and all damage that may happen to any utilities during construction of the project. 6. No business or home occupation shall be allowed in either the attached or detached garage. 7. The applicant shall provide an updated survey with the building permit. 8. The applicant obtains a building permit prior to construction. T CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-019 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE IN AN R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT 10051 PRESCOTT DRIVE, LOT 7, BLOCK 4, GROVELAND 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct an attached garage structure in the rear portion of the subject property for storage of private residential storage and lawn equipment; and WHEREAS, the proposed attached garage space would exceed the standard garage area of 1,200 square feet with a total of 1,418 square feet; and WHEREAS, garage space, when exceeding 1,200 square feet, requires a Conditional Use Permit, and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Single -Family Residence (R-1) and, which allows such use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Places to Live" for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting the proposed structure and location of the structure on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7, 2020 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the attached garage will be in compliance with maximum square footage requirements, which require a maximum square footage for attached and detached accessory structures of 1,500 square feet. 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the attached garage addition is architecturally similar to the principal structure in roofline and fagade appearance, subject to appropriate conditions of approval. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-019 The parcel is a lot which will accommodate the accessory space without crowding the subject property or neighboring parcels. 4. The building will be constructed so as to be consistent with the use and building massing of other single family structures common in the community and in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for an attached garage, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: 1. The exterior materials used to finish the accessory structure must be similar and/or coordinating to the existing home in material type and color, including a wainscot treatment of brick similar to that of the principal building front or additional landscaping to screen the view of the structure. 2. No exterior lighting be attached to the garage that will glare onto adjoining property. 3. The disturbed areas of the site shall be seeded or sodded within one (1) calendar year of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 4. The City Engineer review the plans and address any drainage concerns. The applicants shall adhere to any follow up recommendations by the City Engineer. 5. The applicant is responsible for any and all damage that may happen to any utilities during construction of the project. 6. No business or home occupation shall be allowed in either the attached or detached garage. 7. The applicant shall provide an updated survey with the building permit. 8. The applicant obtains a building permit prior to construction. ADOPTED this 7t' day of July, 2020 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: Sam Murdoff, Chair 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-019 ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Kevin & Sara Haman I Request for Conditional Use Permit Created by: City of Monticello Legal: Lot 7, Block 4, Groveland 2nd Addition I PI D: 155-132-004070110051 Prescott Drive Conditional Use Permit Narrative This accessory structure will be used for storage of our boat, tools, lawn mowers, etc.. The structure will be 26 x 28. The roof pitch will be 5/12 in accordance with code and have architectural shingles. The siding will be vinyl and will either be the same light gray color as our house or a different complimentary darker gray color. The soffit, facia, trim and doors will be white to match our house. There are multiple reasons which make this structure obscure from street view, therefore, I do not intend to include brick on the front. The reasons are as follows: Our house sits on a pie shaped lot. The narrow side of our lot adjoins the road at the east side of our property. Access to this structure will be along the North side of our property as the structure will be located in the furthest most Northwest corner of our property. Both of our neighbors have fences. The distance between our garage and the northern neighbor's fence is 21' leaving a very limited viewing window of the structure from the street. In fact, at the street, the full "face" of this structure can only be seen for 19'along the street. As you can see from the pictures, we live on a curve so people driving by should be watching the road to make the curve and will doubtfully even know it is there. Additionally, as you can see from the pictures there is a bit of a hill and side hill between the street and the proposed structure and between our garage and the fence which would also obscure at least a portion of the brick if not all of it. Finally, the four spaced out green utility boxes are less attractive than a structure without brick. -Al 10 :!;ir Z! Ll -rr r � � �- - �- _ � — � - }'S � I _— ' � k '-- I 'r I. ' � Y _ + `� �� k it _ — �: ~�-' Y'l''�F• � � I ' ' ��:� li � � I i'4 - _ I' � � r � _ _ �� t -i�.; _ d �� r � � ' �T � � �2 _� �. ' k�_ 4 �f l} vr� �'�+- _�' h� '� .� •`mow. s '4 ~ ' ti %.ri.�._•r f.�f f.��� s�,.,�: . ��� � ry� '�Y�i-� '''�4'•t'� � +�' tis • �" � '�� '{� `��` :�;'�� 1 �lSr�'11 '�'fl a. �r��:'JYL. �:�irr 41 '/L�'��. }.�' V -V X/ -V NIMI N I LIV/7IV -L I I\LE GVHD. DR. SIDING � TRIM LEFT ELEVATION 1 /8" = 1 '-0" 12 12 SIDING � TRIM BEAR ELEVATION 1 /8" = 1 '-0" PnnG 1/PK ITC, AC, PPr) In FRONT ELEVATION I v -v n i v -v i v -v n i v -v OVHD. DR. OVHD. DR. RIGHT ELEVATION MAINTENANCE FREE SIDING � TRIM 11411= 1 '-0" WIMI IV I LIV/7IV -L I I\LL SIDING � TRIM 1 /8" = 1 '-0" D15CLAIMER IN PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN EVERY ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO AVOID MISTAKES. DESIGNER CANNOT GUARANTEE AGAINST HUMAN ERROR. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. THESE DESIGNS, CONCEPTS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH REMAIN THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF COUNTRY LUMBER AND ARE NOT TO BE COPIED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF COUNTRY LUMBER. OF 3 00 N N �9 O O c� cy) cy) O O r Ln O O rn O z cv � U 0 OF 3 20-0" 2x6 WALLLS GARAGE 0 4" CONC. FLK. SLAB co W/ 6x6-10/ 10 W.W.M. N N 67 �'-0" x 10'-0" — — — F'-0" x 10'-0" — — — OVID. DR. I I OVID. DK. R.O. 38"x 82 1 /2" X o N 3/OI R.O. 10'-0" x 101-0 2-1 1 7/8" MLI CONT. R.O. 10'-0" x 10'-0" N METIOD PFI NARROW WALL BRACING SEE DETAIL PG. S 1 7'-0" 121-011 7'-0" 7r 7r 20-0" FLOOR PLAN 728 SFT. (GARAGE) 0 co N 1/411= 1 '-0" o iI = X I N o STORAGE 0 o I ROOF TRUSSES N — — �� @ 2'-0" O.C. GARAGE 0 4" CONC. FLK. SLAB co W/ 6x6-10/ 10 W.W.M. N N 67 �'-0" x 10'-0" — — — F'-0" x 10'-0" — — — OVID. DR. I I OVID. DK. R.O. 38"x 82 1 /2" X o N 3/OI R.O. 10'-0" x 101-0 2-1 1 7/8" MLI CONT. R.O. 10'-0" x 10'-0" N METIOD PFI NARROW WALL BRACING SEE DETAIL PG. S 1 7'-0" 121-011 7'-0" 7r 7r 20-0" FLOOR PLAN 728 SFT. (GARAGE) 0 co N 1/411= 1 '-0" BUILDING SECTION @ GABLE END DROPPED TOP CHORD GABLE TRUSS SEE BUILDERS SPECIFICATION FOR BUILDING MATERIALS 3/811= 1'-0" BUILDING SECTION SEE BUILDERS SPECIFICATION FOR BUILDING MATERIALS 3/8,1= 1 '-0° EXTENT OF HEADER WITH DOUBLE PORTAL FRAME (TWO BRACED WALL PANELS) EXTENT OF HEADER WITH SINGLE PORTAL FRAME (ONE BRACED WALL PANEL) 2'- 18' FINISHED WIDTH OR OPENING FOR SINGLE OR DOUBLE PORTAL TENSION STRAP PER TABLE 602.10.6.4 (ON OPPOSE SIDE OF SHEATHING) q00000000 IL IF NEEDED PANEL SPLICE EDGES SHALL OCCUR FASTEN TOP PLATE TO AND BE ATTACHED TO HEADER WITH TWO ROWS COMMON BLOCKING = WITHIN 24" OF WALL OF 6D SINKER NAILS AT 'L MID -HEIGHT. ONE ROW 3" O.C. TYP OF 3" O.C. NAILING IS MIN. 7 / 16" WOOD p REQUIRED IN EACH PANEL STRUCTURAL PANEL Lu TYPICAL PORTAL FRAME SHEATHING CONSTRUCTION lo N b MIN. DOUBLE 2x4 POST ° ° ° ° (KING AND JACK STUD). NUMBER OF JACK STUDS PER TABLES R502(I) (2) MIN. 1000 LB HOLD-DOWNS (EMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE AND NAILED INTO FRAMING) MIN. (1) 5/8" DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLT INSTALLED PER 8403. I.6 WITH 2"x2"x3/16" PLATE WASHER METHOD PFG PORTAL FRAME GARAGE 51 SEE BUILDERS SPECIFICATION FOR BUILDING MATERIALS 3/8"= 1'-0° OF I 000 0o a MIN3"x l l I/4"NET HEADER o 00 000 ° ° ° ° ° STEEL HEADER PROHIBITED ° ° ° ° ° °°° ° ° ° °° °°° FASTEN SHEATHING TO HEADER WITH 8D COMMON OR GALVANIZED BOX NAILS IN 3" GRID PATTERN AS SHOWN. HEADER TO JACK -STUD STRAP PER TABLE 8602. 10.6.4 ON BOTH SIDES IF OPENING OPPOSITE SIDE OF SHEATHING MIN. DOUBLE 2x4 FRAMING COVERED WITH MIN. 3/8" THICK WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING WITH SD COMMON OR GALVANIZED BOX NAIL AT 3" OC. IN ALL FRAMING (STUDS. BLOCKING AND SILLS) TYP. MIN. LENGTH OF PANEL PER TABLE 8602.1 0.5 MIN. (2) 4200 LB STRAP -TYPE HOLD-DOWNS (EMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE AND NAILED INTO FRAMING) City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 4A. Consideration of authorizing a letter of support for Duffy Development for PUD flexibility as related to a tax credit application for a 53 -unit affordable housing proiect at 7tn Street and Elm Street, Great River Addition (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider authorizing a letter of support for the pending application by Duffy Development to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for the current affordable housing tax credit funding cycle. The letter of support relates to specific requests for PUD flexibility from zoning code requirements, which the applicant would use to demonstrate city financial support for the project as part of the tax credit application process. Duffy Development is proposing a 53 -unit apartment building at the southeast corner of 7th Street West and Elm Street. All (100 %) of the units in the building would be rented to households with qualifying income levels. Rents for the units will be set and based on 50% of the area median income. To make its project feasible, Duffy Development seeks to use the Federal Section 42 Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program as the major source of funding for its project proposal. The process requires an application through the Minnesota Housing Tax Credit program. The program is extremely competitive. To support a more competitive application, Duffy is seeking flexibility in three specific areas of the zoning code under a future formal PUD application. If the Council supports these concepts, Duffy can essentially monetize these into quantifiable amounts and score points in an area of the application for local contributions to the project. To be clear, this request is not a direct fee waiver. Rather, the request is to allow relief from strict code adherence which results in savings in development cost for the project. The areas of PUD flexibility are described below. Reduced front yard setback. The current requirement for front yard setback is 100 feet; the developer requests that be reduced to 40 feet. Allowing the reduction of setback provides the ability to tuck the surface parking behind the building and facilitate underground parking. • The applicant's narrative indicates that the cost of land for the proposed project is at a purchase price of $3.50/square foot. A reduction in setback will allow a reduction in purchase of approximately 18,000 square feet, a savings to the project and cost contribution of $63,000. The setback reduction allows the applicant to make use of the site topography, placing a large share of parking underground, which is consistent with city goals for multi -family housing. In addition, the setback reduction encourages a building forward site design, placing surface parking behind the front line of the building, also a desired site design characteristic. 2. Waiver of the parking requirements. The current ordinance requirement is City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 2.25 spaces per unit, with 1.15 spaced required to be covered. The applicant is requesting a reduction in unit count overall, with a net reduction of 8 stalls underground. • At an approximate development cost of $23,000 per stall, that is a cost contribution consideration of $184,000. As noted above, the city's ordinances are directed at achieving the majority of parking underground for multi -family projects. Flexibility in this standard is consistent with past multi -family projects, where parking requirements have been reduced (such as the Briggs project) but also in financial support. The EDA used pooled affordable housing funds to support underground parking at the Rivertown Suites project. Waiver of the 900 square foot minimum unit size. The 9 one -bedroom units are proposed at approximately 750 square feet in area. • At an estimated construction cost of $75.00/square foot, the reduction in square footage from 900 square feet to approximately 750 square feet for the 9 one -bedrooms is just over $100,000. • The city has previously approved unit size reductions in each of the last four multi -family projects it has considered, including Monticello Crossings, Rivertown Suites, Twin Pines and Deephaven. The amount of reduction from 900 square feet has varied across these projects. In summary, these three areas of flexibility would result in an ability to demonstrate $347,000 in local financial support through PUD flexibility. The developer has submitted a Concept Stage PUD proposal for purposes of gaining feedback on the project and the areas of requested flexibility. The Planning Commission and City Council met on July 7th, 2020 to review the Concept PUD. The staff memorandum providing an overview of the Concept PUD is attached as supporting data. Although there was general preliminary support for the PUD flexibilities noted above, direction as related to support for the overall project was mixed. It was noted that the city had consistently reduced unit size in prior projects, and that underground parking is preferred. Discussion on the flexibilities was limited, as much of the discussion focused on the land use, site and affordability component of the project. Comments from the Commission and Council included both concern and support for conversion of the proposed project site from commercial to residential through Comprehensive Plan Amendment. In addition, there was concern expressed with the potential for this project to compete with the recently approved multi -family projects in other areas of the community. The site configuration also created questions for the Commission and Council, as an approximately 1 acre commercial parcel would be platted and remain vacant behind the proposed apartment building. Members were unsure about the viability of the parcel for commercial purposes. In summary, there was not consensus among the members present regarding the proposed project. During the Concept PUD meeting, it was noted that to City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 better understand the current housing market, as well as housing projections and trends, the city is currently undertaking a housing study. The last housing study was completed in 2017. The developer understands the lack of consensus and comments provided, but has asked that the Council consider the letter of support as they continue to consider their next steps. Duffy Development also seeks the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to help close the gap in the project development costs. The EDA administers the city's TIF programs, including TIF Districts created in support of affordable housing. On June 10th and June 24th, the EDA met to review the proposal in terms of the potential use of TIF. Ultimately, citing the EDA's goals for affordable workforce housing, the EDA adopted a resolution expressing preliminary support for the establishment of a Housing TIF District. The City Council is required to act to establish a TIF District, and as such, a similar resolution is the subject of an additional report on this agenda. If the Council supports this project, it could use also additional tools to assist the developer in their application, including direct fee waivers on development costs such as park dedication, SAC/WAC, and/or trunk fees. Al. Budget Impact: There is no direct impact to the city budget for authorizing this letter. The flexibility requested is not a direct fee waiver. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Limited to the preparation of this report, including background research, at approximately 4 hours. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize a letter of support for Duffy Development for PUD flexibility as related to a tax credit application for a 53 -unit affordable housing project at 7th Street and Elm Street, Great River Addition , subject to language review by the City Attorney based on the outcome of Council's discussion. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Affordable housing in support of attracting and retaining workforce has been a priority of the EDA in its past and current workplans. The 2017 housing study notes that over 46% of Monticello residents who rent housing pay over 30% of their income in housing costs, a much higher rate than owner -occupied residents (19%). The report notes that at present 26% of Monticello's multi -family housing is considered affordable through federal or state programs. However, the number does not include recently constructed or approved multi -family projects. Overall, the report cites the need to keep affordable housing in balance in the community. In addition, it is noted that the impact of recent approvals and construction of multi- family units is unknown in terms of both demand and rental rates. Approximately 400 multi -family units have been constructed, approved or are in some stage of consideration by the city within the last 3 years. However, projects including required affordable units represent less than 2.5% of these approved units. In addition, this 400 -unit supply does City Council Agenda: 07/13/2020 not include any fixed rent affordable projects. The Duffy project also includes 5 units for mobility -limited or disabled residents and 7 units for long-term homeless transitioning. The current Comprehensive Plan and the draft Land Use Strategies for Monticello 2040 cite the need for a full range of life -cycle housing options, including both multi -family and affordable housing. The housing study update is being undertaken to determine the existing and projected mix and balance of housing in relationship to these goals. However, staff recognizes that this project presents a number other considerations outside of the need for affordable housing, including those related to land use for site location and design. Given the limited discussion on the requested PUD conditions, and that the Commission and Council indicated concerns that will only be addressed with a formal land use application process, authorization of a letter of support at this time may be premature. The City Attorney has advised against a letter of support unless the PUD requests are minor and/or there is strong support for the overall project. If Council elects to proceed, staff would recommend working with the City Attorney on the supporting letter language. In summary, this item represents a policy consideration with a number of facets for the City Council. It is important that the Council provide direction to the developer as it will help the developer determine next steps in their process. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft Letter of Support B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Site Plans E. Building Elevations F. Applicant Presentation, 7/7/20 G. Staff Memorandum, Concept PUD Submittal H. 2017 Housing Study I. 2008 Comprehensive Plan, Excerpts J. Monticello 2040 Vision, Excerpts July 14', 2020 Mr. Jeff Von Feldt Duffy Development Corporation, Inc. 12708 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 400 Minnetonka, MN 55305 RE: Proposed Monticello Apartments Dear Mr. Von Feldt, On July 7ti', 2020, the City of Monticello City Council and Planning Commission considered a request for Concept Stage Planned Unit Development for the proposed 52 -unit Duffy Monticello apartment project. The proposal includes 53 units, with 100% of the units proposed as affordable housing. The concept proposal included a request for consideration of the following three areas of planned unit development flexibility: Front yard setback reduction from 100 feet to approximately 40 feet. Reduction in the total number of required underground parking stalls; approximately 8 stalls. 3. Reduction in the minimum required unit size for one -bedroom units. The flexibility requested would allow the developer construction and land cost savings, providing support to the application for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's application for low income tax credits. During their discussion regarding the concept proposal, the Planning Commission and City Council offered general preliminary support for the PUD flexibility noted. The Commission and Council indicated remaining questions and concerns regarding demand, location and site design for the project, which will be considered as part of the required formal land use applications. As the project moves from concept to formal land use applications, it is therefore understood that the developer intends to bring forward these areas of PUD flexibility. While there is no guarantee that the planned unit development will be approved, the preliminary comments of the Planning Commission and City Council indicate support specific to the requested PUD flexibility. Sincerely, Brian Stumpf Mayor Duffy Development Company, Inc I Request for Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Legal: Outlot B, Great River Addition I PID: 155-226-000020 Created by: City of Monticello June 10, 2020 City of Monticello Community Development PUD — Concept Proposal Narrative Duffy Development Company, Inc. is proposing the development of a 53 -unit multifamily housing development in Monticello. The site, located at the northwest corner of 7th Street West and Elm Street, will encompass approximately 2.66 acres and is proposed to have driveway access off of 7th Street West. The housing proposal will provide 53 units of workforce housing with rents that will serve households with incomes at or below 50% of the area median income. This housing is primarily meant to serve a family of four that would have an income of approximately $62,000 or less. Rents would range from $875 for a one -bedroom to $1,200 for a three-bedroom unit. As proposed currently, the building would have 9 one -bedroom units, 24 two-bedroom units and 20 three-bedroom units. Property amenities would include an on-site playground, underground parking, a community room, a fitness room and on- site management and a secured entrance. Unit amenities would include a full appliance package with in -unit washer and dryer, walk-in closets and balconies/patios. The building will be constructed using the guidelines of "Green Communities" providing for healthy, efficient and environmentally responsible homes. The site is currently owned by Riverwood Bank, here in Monticello, and is a small portion of 20 acres they own along the freeway. The land is currently zoned B-3, Highway Business District. The zoning is described "...provide for limited commercial and service activities..." and could have uses such as automobile dealerships or hotels. Because of the current zoning, we are requesting a change in the zoning of this parcel and asking for a Planned Unit Development under the R-4 zoning. The current zoning of B-3 does not have density requirements as it is not meant for residential housing. The R-4 zone does have a density requirement of 10 — 25 units per acre. In this case, with 2.66 acres, the density is proposed at approximately 20 units per acre. The timing of this development is as follows: July, 2020 — submittal of funding application to Minnesota Housing. The main funding source is the Housing Tax Credit program. December, 2020 — Funding awards are announced. If funded, the development moves on to design and City approvals. If not funded, the project either waits to apply in the summer of 2021 or does not move forward at all. March — May, 2021— City entitlement process. Official City review and approval of development plan and possibly TIF support. August, 2021— Close on financing and begin construction. Approximately 12 -month construction schedule. August, 2022 — Construction complete and leasing begins. December, 2062 —Affordability requirements expire. The Concept Plan is presented as a site plan and a building elevation. Regarding the flexibility requested. We would like to request flexibility to the R-4 zoning in the following ways: 1. Request a reduced front yard setback. The current requirement for front yard setback is 100 feet and we request that be reduced to 40 feet which is consistent with the R3 Multi -Family District. As a comparison, The B-3 zoning only requires a 30 -foot setback. As an example, a three-story hotel could be constructed (conditional use) within 30 feet of the property line at 7th Street West and 20 feet of the property line at Elm Street. Allowing the reduction of setback provides the ability to tuck the surface parking behind the building and creating more inviting curb appeal. 2. Request a waiver of the parking requirements. We request the City allow 1:1 parking in the covered parking garage. If I am reading the code correctly, it currently requires 1.15 covered parking stalls per unit. For a 53 -unit building, it would require an additional eight covered parking stalls. In our properties, each unit receives an underground parking stall included in their rent. Our experience in this type of housing confirms our request that no more than two stalls per unit (1 covered and 1 surface) overall, are required. 3. Request a waiver of the 900 square foot minimum. We have 9 one -bedroom units proposed in this building. The typical one -bedroom unit in our designs is closer to 750 square feet and we would ask that this be allowed in this design. A quick review of similar properties shows Monticello Crossing one -bedrooms at 761 square feet and Rivertown Residential Suites from 710 to 806 square feet. We request flexibility in the minimum per code. The zoning code allows for PUD Options for Multi -Family Buildings and we would like to suggest we can provide improved landscaping, all garage parking underground, increase use of brick and a very attractive building as you can see by the color elevation. Workforce and affordable housing development is a complicated and competitive process. It requires the developer to complete a very thorough application to Minnesota Housing, the State's housing finance agency. Multiple steps must be achieved before an application can be submitted and applications can only be submitted once per year. It is vital that all aspects of the application are accounted for. A City's support for the development is critical. If nothing else, a support resolution by the City Council goes a long way in the eyes of the State. The City has taken a helpful step. In 2017, a housing study was generated by WSB. The study suggests the need for approximately 220 units of rental housing by 2021 and is states Monticello should make efforts to increase affordable rental housing inventory. One of the ways to do that is by the use of the Low-income Housing Tax Credit program. The program funds are awarded by score. The higher the score, the better the chance of receiving the funding. We do our best to create the most competitive housing development without promising more than we can deliver just to score points. Other than a resolution of support noted above, we are asking the City for two other levels of support that will help with the scoring process. 1. We are asking the City EDA to consider Tax Increment Financing to help fill a gap in our funding. Although it is very early in the process, we are asking the EDA to consider a TIF award in the amount of approximately $500,000. This will fill a need in the "Readiness to Proceed" scoring category. 2. We would like to ask the City to consider the waiver of fees or the waiver of development requirements that will save costs to the overall development process. Items 1, 2 and 3 above, if approved would provide cost savings. Item 1 would allow us to save on the cost of the land. At $3.50 per square foot purchase price, reducing the setback by 60 feet would be a net savings of approximately 18,000 square feet of space and about $63,000 of cost. Item 2 would allow the savings of eight underground parking stalls at about $7,000 per stall. This totals $56,000. Item 3 would provide construction savings of approximately 150 square feet by nine units. A Total of about 1,350 square feet. Construction costs assume approximately $75/foot. Therefore, a total savings in this category of just over $100,000. All together the proposed waivers will net savings of $219,000. This, in and of itself, would be very helpful and would score 2 points in the "Other Contributions" scoring category. We would be happy to describe the financing in more detail if requested. 7A INIIN, 11*0 MECH. \ OFQ \ \ ELECT. ct 5-0 TR m \ P / � LOBBY $RGROUN GARAGE \ \ 13 / \ \ 12 r� -SITE FLAN / SCALE: I" = 40'-0" 115,958 S.F. \ \ 2.66 ACRES \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ pR of. THIO Z L \ \ I \ ■ r r � s -min 0 0 Z W Q (Z Q U) 0 N w J 0 N 0 0 0 w 0 J Eao■■■■■■■ EMMEMEMEME c■■■■■■■■■ Cm"MOM■■■■ 71'44' DECORATIVE GRILL ASPHALT SHINGLES uec.vnn ive a.nii nes - --- - - - VINYL SHAKE SIDING ix[ PRE -FIN. MTL WRAPPED TRIM ona� 3 - _ APPED FASCIA WRAPPED TRIM . CORNER TRIM - 'L WINDOW TRIM - ) 911 -M_ L VINYL SIDING - VINYL WINDOWS - STONE CAP - BRICK VENEER - Duffy Development Company, Inc.... STONE SILL SOLDIER COURSE HEADER W/ CIVIL ITH STREET ELEVATION SCALE: ve' - '-o' MONTICELLO RPRRTMENTS M 0 NTI CELLO, M N IXL PRE -FIN. MTL WRAPPED FASCIA — IX8 PRE -FIN. MTL WRAPPED TRIM PREFABRICATED SUSPENDED'DECKS ITH STREET ELEVATION SCALE: ve' - '-o' MONTICELLO RPRRTMENTS M 0 NTI CELLO, M N Duffy Development Company, Inc. Monticello Apartment oncept Review Currently own 21 and manage 1.8 Housing Tax Credit properties in the Twin Cities The Crossing in Big Lake — 71 Units The Depot in Elk River— 53 Units Coachman Ridge in Elk River — 53 Units m Owner — first property developed Under Section 42done in1992 Strong community relationships ff Duffy Development Comparisons Minnetonka Duffv Development Comparisons VE a Duffy Development Comparisons The Depot Elk River T M C V—" -. �, ltd, LiL Dkr�TIL Monticello Apartments 91111[=1110 Monticello Apartments MUNTIC1110 APARTMENTS MONT11[[101 MN FRCHITECTS COLE GROUP JA 21E5 Port A3Mnu&& SL" IW - 8t 0 luQd. MM 5W+ Monticello Apartments Proposed Rents One Bedroom - $875, HPH units @ $86 Two Bedroom - x1,075, HPH units @$126 Three Bedroom - x1,200, HPH units @ $110 Monticello Apartments Housing Tax Credit Program Federal program of the Internal Revenue Service Passed on to States for administration purposes Awarded to developers based on a competitive process Monticello request is for X1.3 Million in credits Minnesota has approximately $5 Million in credits for Greater MN State estimates close to 7o applications for Housing Tax Credits Extremely competitive!! Monticello Apartments Housing Tax Credit Program The tax credits produce equity for construction The credits are utilized annually over Zo years. Credits are sold to a third -party investor $1.3M award for 10 years = $13,000,000 Investor partner buys credits for cash at a present value Credits are currently worth approximately $.86/$1.00 Generates approximately $11.2 M for construction The Zo-year credit creates 40 years of affordable housing Monticello Apartments EDA Financial Discussion Sources and Uses of Funds Development Expenses Amount Land $ 405,000 Hard Construction Costs $ 9,734,400 Professional Fees $ 11519,600 City Development Fees $ 454,000 Other Soft Costs $ 471,000 Financing Costs $ 631,082 Capitolized Reserves $ 275,000 Total Construction Sources $ 13,500,682 Development Sources Amortizing First Mortgage (GMHF) $ 1,825,DD4 Limited Partnership Equity (Tax Credits) $ 11,178,882 City TIFIFee Waivers $ 495,8D4 Total Permanent Sources $ 13, 500, 682 Monticello Apartments Application scoring and City support (2categories) Readiness to Proceed Funding gap compared to total development costs Can receive up to 16 points in competition scoring TIF support fills funding gap and allows maximum points possible Other Contributions Non-financial support compared to total development costs Can receive up to 10 points in competition scoring Fee waivers and development flexibility create value Goal is to achieve 3.5% of non-financial support ($473,000) Monticello Apartments Other Contributions Continued Fee waivers and development flexibility create value Waive setback requirement - $52,000 Allow one covered space vs. 1.15 - s184,000 Allow less than goo square foot minimum - ssoo,000 Can receive up to Zo points in competition scoring Goal is to achieve 3.5% of non-financial support ($473,000) Monticello Apartments Questions NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Angela Schumann Mayor Stumpf and Monticello City Council Monticello Planning Commission FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: June 29, 2020 RE: Monticello — Duffy Development Multi Family Project— Concept PUD Review NAC FILE NO: 191.07 — 20.05 PLANNING CASE NO: 2020-017 PROPERTY ID: 155-226-000020 Application and Project Description. This memorandum reviews the elements of a proposed concept plan for a Planned Unit Development on the parcel bound by 7th Street to the north, Elm Street to the west, vacant commercial property to the east, and 1-94 to the south. The development parcel consists of approximately 2.66 acres out of a total of 20 acres, all of which is currently zoned and guided for commercial use. The 20 acre parcel currently has no development upon it. The eastern boundary of the site abuts the Runnings retail property. North of 7th Street is a mix of medium density residential development and other vacant land zoned and guided for residential use. Access to future development on the subject property is provided from 7th Street. The applicants have proposed the conversion of the northwest corner of the property to residential use, leaving a strip of the primary parcel along 1-94 for further commercial development. The proposed project consists of a 53 unit multi -family building. The site plan shows one access point from 7th Street. The proposal comes from Duffy Development, and is designed to provide "workforce" housing for families making generally less than about $62,000 (family of four). There is a sliding scale of income qualification, dependent on family size. The income limitations are set by the State of Minnesota's tax credit program, from which the applicants will qualify for financing that infuses equity into the project, facilitating feasibility. The applicant's narrative describes the tax credit program, and the timing. At this stage, the applicants are seeking comments from the City, and some confidence that the City will support the plan, after which the applicants will seek the tax credits in a competitive process. In support of their tax credit application, the applicant's narrative describes three primary PUD flexibility areas for which they are seeking specific direction from the city. These are a reduction in front setback, reduction in parking count, and relaxation in minimum unit square footage size. If the Commission and Council find these areas of flexibility to be acceptable, these items would be considered the same as a monetary contribution commitment by the city and will allow the applicant to score additional points in their application to MHFA. If successful in procuring the credits, the applicants will return next spring (2021) for more formal zoning approvals. The property is currently zoned B-3, Highway Business District. However, the developers are asking for the parcel to be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, utilizing the R-4, Medium -High Residence District as the baseline zoning for comparative purposes. The structure would include (in concept form) 9 one -bedroom units, 24 two-bedroom units, and 20 three-bedroom units. The remainder of the site consists of parking and open space, including underground parking below the building area. The multi -family housing project would provide 46 uncovered, on grade parking stalls, with an additional 38 stalls of parking underground. The underground parking would be accessible from an easterly entrance off 7t" Street. To facilitate this layout, and to retain as much commercial land along 1-94 as possible, the applicants are seeking flexibility from the extensive setbacks that would otherwise apply to R-4 development. The typical requirements would be 100 feet for building front setbacks, and 40 feet on a corner side yard. The proposed site plan anticipates moving toward 7t" Street to a setback of approximately 50 feet. It is important to note that no parking or other hard surfaced areas would be located in this setback, consistent with the R-4 standard. The city's zoning ordinance states a density for the R-4 district of 10-25 units per acre. With the parcel size of 2.66 acres, the residential density is approximately 19.9 units per acre. For the project to proceed, there are a series of City approvals that will be required: o PUD Concept Review (the subject of this report). The project requires a PUD as it proposes to develop a combination of separate land parcels and a mix of land uses that will share access to School Boulevard. In addition, certain aspects of site design may require flexibility. Further approvals would include the following: o Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment reguiding the proposed residential parcel from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live"; o Preliminary and Final Plats incorporating the residential and remaining commercial parcels, and resubdividing the property for the proposed commercial and residential uses; o Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District; The current proposal is for a PUD Concept Plan review, which is not a formal zoning application, but is intended to provide the applicant an opportunity to get City feedback on a potential development proposal prior to more formal zoning review and the extensive supporting materials that such reviews require. The Planning Commission and City Council will have the opportunity to review the project, ask questions of the proposer, and provide comment as to the issues and elements raised by the project. Again, the applicant is also looking for specific feedback in the three areas of PUD flexibility noted in their narrative. The neighboring property owners have been notified of the meeting, but it is not a formal public hearing. This memorandum provides an overview of the project and will serve as an outline for the discussion. No formal approval or denial is offered for a Concept Review. However, it is vital that Planning Commission and City Council members engage in a frank and open discussion of the project benefits and potential issues. The Concept Review process is most valuable when the applicants have the opportunity to understand how the City is likely to look at the project and the potential issues it presents. In this way, the subsequent land use and development details can be more finely tuned to address City policy elements. PUD Concept Review Criteria. The first stage consists of an informal Concept Plan review which is separate from the formal PUD application which will follow the Concept Review step. The Ordinance identifies the purpose of Planned Unit Development as follows: (1) Purpose and Intent The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non- residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district. The City reserves the right to 2 deny the PUD rezoning and direct the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable zoning district. PUD Concept reviews are to proceed as follows: (a) PUD Concept Proposal Prior to submitting formal development stage PUD, preliminary plat (as applicable) and rezoning applications for the proposed development, the applicant may, at its option, prepare an informal concept plan and present it to the Planning Commission and City Council at a concurrent work session, as scheduled by the Community Development Department. The purpose of the Concept Proposal is to: 1. Provide preliminary feedback on the concept plan in collaboration between the applicant, general public, Planning Commission, and City Council; 2. Provide a forum for public comment on the PUD prior to a requirement for extensive engineering and other plans. 3. Provide a forum to identify potential issues and benefits of the proposal which can be addressed at succeeding stages of PUD design and review. The intent of Concept Proposal review is to consider the general acceptability of the proposed land use, and identify potential issues that may guide the City's later consideration of a full PUD application. The City Council and Planning Commission meet in joint session to provide feedback to the developer, and may include an opportunity for informal public comment as they deem appropriate. Staff Preliminary Comments and Issues. For this proposal, the primary considerations evident at this point in the process include the following elements: Land Use. As stated above, the proposed land use is currently zoned B-3 Highway Business District, and guided "Places to Shop" (Commercial). The property has long been expected to develop as commercial property, given the high levels of commercial use along 7t" Street to the east, and the 1-94 exposure. Monticello's code states that B-3 property can be rezoned for multiple family residential uses if it is not in a prime commercial area. Given that the applicants have illustrated a site plan which retains the 1-94 exposure for commercial uses, does the City consider this site 2.66an important component of its commercial land inventory? If not, multiple family residential may be considered a reasonable use given the mix of other uses in the immediate area, including townhomes to the north, and other multi - residential to the northeast. 3 In evaluating past requests for rezoning of commercial property to R-4, the city has looked to its policy discussions held at the time of the adoption of the R-4 district, which suggest that rezoning be considered when factors such as access, surrounding land use, inventory, etc. support the conversion. While the real estate market had significantly slowed during the last several years, commercial development continued in some measure, occurring almost exclusively in more easily accessible areas. The proposed site would appear to be a reasonable candidate for non-commercial uses. City officials need to determine if they consider this property non -prime commercial area in order to be amended. As a part of this consideration, the City's new Community Vision document, and the companion Future Land Use Strategies document (in draft form), both speak to the opportunities for additional multiple family housing, as well as the importance for options available to workforce families. The draft Land Use Strategies document under guides the subject site as a Commercial and Residential Flex use, which presumes a mix of the two land uses, more than likely accomplished through planned unit development. It is noted throughout both documents that housing choice is changing, driven by both generational changes and lifestyle choices. Rental options — particularly those available to young families in transition, and those seeking proximity to walkable, mixed use areas, are important components of the City's makeup. Trends in other areas support the continued increasing demand for Monticello as well. The applicants have suggested that they may also acquire the adjoining 1-94 frontage parcel as a part of a future project. At this time, there is no development plan for that additional parcel, although the applicants suggest that either commercial or residential may be part of a future proposal. That being said, the current concept PUD discussion only involves the 7t" Street frontage parcel, and the current Concept request is not dependent on the other parcel land use or development. ii. Parking and Circulation. The plan relies on underground parking for a significant portion of the parking supply. Because underground parking is expensive, it's inclusion in a project that ill be affordable to workforce families is an important factor. In past multi -family housing proposals, the city has been consistent in looking for under -building or underground parking as a requirement supporting rezoning to R-4. The total parking provided in the concept is 84 stalls, or 1.6 stalls per unit, which is less than the 2.25 required by ordinance. The plan proposes .87 stalls per unit uncovered. The uncovered calculation meets the maximum requirement of 1.1 spaces uncovered. 12 One of the objectives of the R-4 district was to reduce the visual impact of large multi -family parking lots along the main access road. As noted, the applicants have located all surface parking away from the exposure from adjacent roadways. This design, coupled with the underground parking supply, mitigates the loss of setback area along 7t" Street. iii. Building Height and Architecture. The applicants have provided preliminary details relating to building design at this stage. Staff would note that the R-4 zoning district encourages certain specific elements related to roof line, building materials, and overall design. The supplied concept drawings show a varied roof line and wall faqade facing 7t" Street. The applicant is seeking some flexibility with the roof line, as they are proposing a mix of roof slopes, between 4:12 (the dominant roof slope) and 6:12 present in the gable ends. The R-4 District specifies a minimum 5:12 roof slope, and as such, the PUD component would be necessary to facilitate the proposed design. The proposed building is 3 stories of residential use (just 2 stories on the lower west end), which would be expected to rise to approximately 50 feet in height over the lowest grade. On the west side of the building, the at -grade floor includes parking garage, consistent with the intent of the R-4 District standards. Building materials are illustrated in this submission, and include a mixture of masonry and vinyl siding. PUD design is expected to exceed the basic district standards in exchange for the flexibility offered under the PUD process. The applicants have worked toward this aspect with a secondary roofline above the 2nd story, enhancing the design with an articulated building wall and balconies, all of which add interest and shadowing to the building. The developer is also proposing the introduction of PUD flexibility with regard to the minimum unit size for units, with some units proposed as under the 900 square foot minimum. It is noted that the building does include a number of 3 bedroom units. iv. Site Planning. A preliminary site plan is provided as a part of the PUD Concept plan. Staff notes that specific requirements for open space and extensive setback regulations apply in the R-4 District. If the applicants propose to vary from the base zoning standards, they should provide rationale that supports the variation, and note the additional amenities or elements of the site plan that balance the proposed flexibility. Civil plans are yet to be developed, and these are likely to result in modifications to the site plan as the project proceeds through PUD review. a. The zoning requirements for the setback standards need to be taken into consideration. As noted above, the applicants are hoping to utilize PUD to 5 flex the front setback requirement, but will meet the other required setbacks. The R-4 setback standards are as follows: i. 100 feet, front side ii. 40 feet, corner side iii. 40 feet, rear iv. Clear open space from ROW - 60 feet, v. Clear open space from property line - 40 feet. V. Connectivity and Open Space. Based on the site plan and concept narrative provided by the applicant, the amount of open space was not detailed, although the plan shows open common space in the courtyard on the south side of the building. Stormwater management requirements will impact usable open space. To meet the zoning standards, the applicant must propose at least 500 square feet of common open space per dwelling unit. The high amount of impervious surface (driveways, parking, sidewalks and principal buildings) appears to limit usable green space available to future residents of the project. Maximizing the utility and attractiveness of the open space on the site would be an important design consideration as the project moves forward, both as a component of residential environment and to meet the City's intended amenities requirement under a PUD option. a. Trails. As a residential project, it would be important to provide connections for residents to nearby amenities, such as schools, shopping and the downtown. 7th Street was constructed with a pathway on the north side of the roadway, extending to Elm Street east to Minnesota Street. Residents of this development would have to cross 7t1 Street, walk east, and re -cross 7th Street. More current trail planning has incorporated a policy of sidewalk and/or pathway on both sides of major (collector and arterial) roadways. The applicant will therefore be required as part of platting to include pathway along their frontage on the south side of 7th Street and along Elm. Connections in the pathway system north of 7th Street along Elm are also being explored. In support of continued efforts to complete gaps in its pathway system, the city may initiate a pathway improvement project in the area and assess the cost per current city policy. It may also be possible to utilize TIF to complete an extension of the system along Elm with this development. Further, the property owner should be aware that an extension of the pathway westward along the south side of 7th Street will be required as part of any future development. Similar to Elm Street, the city may also initiate a pathway connection project in the area and assess the cost per current city policy. n b. Parks. The property would require platting and is therefore subject to park dedication requirements. Country Club Park is approximately'/4 mile from the site, within the 1/2 mile distance standard identified in the Park and Pathway Plan However, it is noted that this park may have some limitations for this development due to current lack of trail connections and that it is interior to the Country Club neighborhood, vi. Landscaping and Buffering. The project will be subject to a buffer requirement between the commercial and residential properties, requiring specific additional setbacks and landscaping to screen and buffer the differing land uses. It would be expected that the development provide enhanced landscaping features as part of any PUD flexibility. vi. Civil Site Design. The City Engineer has provided a separate comment letter regarding utility, access and stormwater issues. vii. Board Review. The EDA has been asked to consider a preliminary resolution of support for the concept in anticipation of the developer's tax credit application. The EDA adopted a resolution of support of the development and use of TIF assistance to fill an identified funding gap of $500,00, citing the need for workforce housing in the community, and noting that 100% of the units will be affordable. The City Council will also be asked on July 13th, 2020 to consider a resolution of support for establishment of a TIF district, as well as a letter or resolution of support for the flexibilities noted in this report. If the project is successful in its tax credit application, the EDA and City would have a series of required formal considerations and applications in relationship to the TIF District and the land use proposals. The PARC will review a future subdivision request for recommendation on park dedication requirements. Summary. As noted, the Planning Commission and City Council provide comment and feedback to the developer at the Concept Review level. City officials should identify any areas of concern that would require amendment to avoid the potential for eventual denial, as well as any elements of the concept that the City would find essential for eventual approval. Specific comment should address the following potential issues, with the notation that the applicant is looking for specific direction with regard to the Commission and Council's support of PUD flexibility for parking, unit size and front setback. Those items are listed in bold below. 7 1. Overall Land Use — Is the site appropriate to change from commercial to residential? Existing and in -process Comprehensive Planning elements encourage the additional introduction of new housing styles and affordability levels to meet the increased diversity of housing demand. The current zoning code also encourages R-4 zoning in non -prime commercial areas. 2. Density — The density is below the City's maximum R-4 threshold, but relies on PUD flexibility to moderate setbacks, open space, and other features such as roofline and minimum unit size for single bedroom units. 3. Setback — The site plan demonstrates compliance with minimum setbacks with the exception of the front setback. Again, the 50' setback proposed is moderated by parking located behind/central to the site. 4. Unit Size - The applicant proposed flexibility in the minimum unit size for its single bedroom units. 5. Building Design and Materials — The building architecture and materials appears to be consistent with the intent of the R-4 District standards, with the consideration of a variable mix of roof slopes and enhanced materials. 6. Parking Supply- and the access locations of the covered parking garage. 7. Landscaping, green space, setbacks, and other site plan improvements — How adequately does the plan provide access to trails and open space? 8. Circulation and Access — Consider conceptual changes to the entry drives to accommodate internal emergency vehicle circulation. 9. Engineering comments and recommendations. The notes listed above acknowledge that a significant amount of detail will be added as the project proceeds to a more advanced stage of review. SUPPORTING DATA A. Aerial Site Image B. Applicant Narrative C. Site Plan D. Building Elevations E. City Engineer's Comment Letter F. R-4 Zoning Standards G. 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan, Excerpts H. Monticello 2020 Vision Statement, Excerpts I. Link to 2017 Housing Study J. Link to June 10th EDA Staff Reoort and Applicant Presentation n. 75 0 U z W m U) 0 00 z U) 0 a W z z 2 0 0 co W F - Z) U) T W Z) z W a a z W X 0 wsb July 2, 2020 Matt Leonard City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Duffy Affordable Apartment Complex Concept Stage PUD Plan Review City Project No. 2020-017 WSB Project No. R-016386-000 Dear Mr. Leonard: We have reviewed the conceptual stage PUD site plans dated June 12, 2020. The applicant proposes to construct a 53 -unit multifamily affordable housing development. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Monticello's general engineering and stormwater treatment standards. We offer the following comments regarding these matters. 1. Streets and utilities shall be designed in accordance with the applicable City Subdivision Ordinances and the City's General Specifications and Standard Details Plates for Street and Utility Construction. 2. The proposed driveway access is located approximately 290 feet from Elm Street. Street access spacing, grades, and sight lines will be reviewed with future submittals. 3. The site would generate approximately 338 daily trips, 24 AM peak hour trips and 30 PM peak hour trips. The existing Average Daily Traffic on 7th Street is 5300 and on Elm Street is 1550. The addition of the proposed traffic would not have an impact on roadway capacity or operations. 4. A pedestrian path will be required along Elm Street and 7th Street adjacent to the development site. Also, to provide connectivity, a pedestrian path is to be installed along the south side of 7th Street to the existing sidewalk at Minnesota Street. 5. Below are General Stormwater Requirements for the Site: a. The applicant will be required to submit a stormwater management plan for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements in the City's Design Manual b. This site was designed to drain to the regional stormwater pond on the north side of 7th St. The pond will provide rate control for the site based on a curve number of 89. c. The new site will need to provide onsite volume control for runoff of 1.1" over the new impervious area, Pre-treatment measures are required prior to discharging to the volume control BMPs. K:\016386-000\Admin\Docs\2020-06-12 Submittal\_2020-06-25 LTR Duffy Apt Concept Plan - WSB Plan Review.docx Duffy Affordable Apartment Complex Concept Stage PUD — WSB Engineering Plan Review July 2, 2020 Page 2 d. An operation and maintenance plan for all stormwater BMPs is required and should be submitted with the stormwater report for review. e. The site is outside of the DWSMA and is not subject to requirements of the City's Wellhead Protection Plan. 6. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 7. A utility plan shall be provided showing the existing and proposed sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer serving the site. Watermain looping may be required through the site to provide adequate fire flow supply. Additional utility stubs to adjacent properties may also be required to accommodate future looping connections. 8. The building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements. 9. A more detailed review of the development plans will be completed when the applicant submits complete civil plans and a stormwater management report. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Feel free to contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions or comments regarding the engineering review. Sincerely, WSB L James L. Stremel, P.E. Senior Project Manager Monticello Population Growth (2010-2018) 14,000 13,8C 13,6C 13,4C 13,2C 13,OC 12,800 12,60 12,40 12,20 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Regional Population Growth (2010-2018) 25% Median Age 31.4 bd Monticello 2010 33.6 Monticello 2017 37.9 bd Minnesota Average 2017 ate°ty pe ava pec �J ora 0J� �aQ e&�; 4" deo oJc cey Monticello Generations (2017) . Gen Z (After 2001)14 and younger . Millennial (1981-2000)15-34 . Gen X (1965-1980) 35-54 . Baby Boomers (1946-1964) 55-74 . Silent (1927-1945)75-84 . GI Gen (1901-1926) 85+ 3% 3% CITY OF MONTICELLO Languages Spoken in Monticello 2010 10 2017 . English as Primary Language . Other as Primary Language Monticello Race/Ethnicity (2017) . White . Hispanic . African American . American Indian - Asian . Two or More Races Population Growth by Race/Ethnicity (2010-2017) 2010 a 2017 12000 10000 800 600 In 0 aoo N N—N en —N- 200 a N In M 0 Educational Attainment (25 and Older) 9th Grade or Below • ♦ 9th to 12th Grade (No Diploma) . High School Graduate Some College (No Degree) Associate's Degree . Bachelor's Degree Graduate/Professional Degree Monticello Household Income (2017) 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% o% 2010 Monticello Average $64,141 2017 Monticello Average $66,478 2017 Minnesota Average $68,388 000 �Co ��� eco,�qq c� �o �° R° Cj c ac o 0 0 o O p O 00 wr 00 00 00 00 Oo Oo 00 000 Oo COMMUNITY VISION (JANUARY 2020) 10 (� NATIONAL TRENDS "MACRO TRENDS" A Ab Itm More people are Declining Desire for choosing homes with smaller Home Mixed Use + lots and lower Ownership Walkability maintenance Alternative Transportation Makes Travel Increasing Rents and Housing Costs due to low vacancy, high land costs, and limited construction 00l Missing Middle Housing Limited construction duplexes, fourplexes and bungalow courts HOUSING Ongoing Concerns for a Recession IMI Decrease in Bricks and Mortar Retail E-commerce has reduced demand for retail space 6 Warehousing E-commerce has increased demand for warehousing, which require a large amount of space a Labor Market is Tightening Competition for skilled labor is tight TRANSPORTATION + INFRASTRUCTURE Dog Parks Dog parks are one of the fastest growing types of parks i More Kids Playing Sports Participation is higher than ever. %I.1 /I% Passive Recreation Desire for more passive parks and nature -based parks ECONOMY 1 PARKS Reliance on Social Media Three-fourths of Americans Autonomous Damaging Vehicles Extreme Weather driverless cars is happening are coming more frequently. automation and internet through their mobile New Tech Alternative Transportation Makes Travel demand for walkable communities Easier is driving change in infrastructure TRANSPORTATION + INFRASTRUCTURE Dog Parks Dog parks are one of the fastest growing types of parks i More Kids Playing Sports Participation is higher than ever. %I.1 /I% Passive Recreation Desire for more passive parks and nature -based parks ECONOMY 1 PARKS Reliance on Social Media Three-fourths of Americans use social media Increasing Automation Mobile Tech Software, industrial Most Americans access the automation and internet through their mobile robotics will continue device, especially low-income, to impact our lives youth, and people of color TECHNOLOGY It Q Increasing Increasing Obesity Levels Health Care Children are Costs becoming more The cost of health obese care continues to rise HEALTH REGIONAL TRENDS Source: Minnesota Compass, http.//www.mncomposs.org/trends/overview Median household income is $65,600 in Minnesota, up $1,300 from the previous year and on par with median household income before the Great Recession of 2008. Housing prices have been rising throughout the State including Monticello. The City has a desire to increase housing supply and provide a range of housing types in the City. HOUSEHOLD INCOME Minnesota is home to some of the largest racial gaps in employment in the nation, ranking among the bottom ten states in employment between Caucasians and other ethnic groups. Monticello is becoming more ethnically diverse which in turn should lower the disparity in racial gaps in employment. RACIAL DISPARITIES ' p,:! Almost 600,000 Minnesota households are cost -burdened or pay 30% or more of their income for housing. People whose housing costs exceed this are likely to struggle to pay for other basic needs, forcing difficult trade-offs. However, Monticello's local average annual income of $66,478 is slightly below this. HOUSING A r 78% of adults in Minnesota are working, equivalent to pre -recession levels. Only neighboring North Dakota has a higher proportion of adults working in the labor force. At 68%, Monticello is below the State average of working adults. The City will seek to increase this through Comprehensive Plan implementation. JOBS + WORKFORCE (� Quick Poll HOUSING OPTIONS The need for additional housing options came up in early conversations with community members and was confirmed by the third quick poll - 72 percent of respondents believe there is a need for more housing options. The quick poll asked for more detail on the type of housing options community members would like to see. Step-up single-family housing was the top ranked choice, followed by single-family starter homes. Empty nester/senior housing, apartments, and attainable housing also ranked highly. GROWTH The final quick poll asked community members how much growth is appropriate for Monticello to achieve by 2040, and what that growth should look like. Though responses were varied, the quotes below provide a representative sample of the responses received. "More affordable smaller houses." "Keep Monticello growing!" `A boardwalk along the river with shops, bars, coffee shops, etc." "Minimal growth, focused on upper end housing and retail." "I see a lot of growth in the next 20 years. I would like to see more housing subdivisions, schools, retail opportunities, industrial development and parks." "More stores and services to keep my money in the city." "More apartment buildings would be ideal to attract younger people who can't afford a house to move back to the area." "We need a youth focused hang out spot." Fr F 1IF Monticello X) 2040 VISION + PLAN Fill in the blank and give us your perspective on the lssuek End appartun fries facing AdOn tice176, now end in the lutblef ,via' k r V �`� Today, kloltticutlo I, TeOerm„hcNio I, The o4om ch.apg, k whet metes lKno kletgleek lk Monlicerlo unique. to the 2640.1 `:WIl Will In the 7040, I hose II Mort•�.tvs�ttri �l:_ — ..-... Ta tlx H. vte n«dw would meta h Oven Ixttcr. .. - -. -- • • - ! "� nor 11 pa„u Photos from the September Celebration Event at Music on the Mississippi COMMUNITY VISION (JANUARY 2020) 26 rhe biggest chn,len9* •.� Yom' Today, Mnatleenp is fedrlg Monlicetlph -.-• -�~� N whel nukes Is what makes Mwnlcoll4 -aide Monik»110 onlpie. In the 2040,1 hope it WHO To Ya it. we need to More NWre • eultl mhke it 1t n bene' would "'ke It even Sett” `t1 inenWWtto is The biggest cnnnetgc tmd ' The biggest chtlkctlge Tetley. Menlltelo Is IMir.g Menrtmld 6 hieing Monticello is J' N. naso in - - -- In She 2040. I hgpc 11 wtll T III It, we need to To IL. ---- Photos from the September Celebration Event at Music on the Mississippi COMMUNITY VISION (JANUARY 2020) 26 VALUE STATEMENTS These statements are informed by community feedback and reflect the aspirations of the community. A safe, clean, and beautiful community supported by caring and helpful residents. A network of parks, open space and trail connections that provide recreation opportunities. An inclusive community welcoming people of all ages, races, religions and ethnic backgrounds. A diversified and strong local economy competitive at regional, state and national levels. A vibrant downtown that embraces the River and provides a focal point for the community. A healthy community focused on physical and mental health and wellness of its residents. A range of attainable housing options in terms of type, cost, and location. A respected school and education system serving the community. A balanced land use and transportation framework that provides options and connectivity. A thriving arts and culture scene that reflects the creativity of the community and supports a sense of place. 55 CITY OF MONTICELLO DOWNTOWN FOCUS The preferred scenario envisions Monticello in 2040 as an environmentally and economically sustainable community that has experienced strong, balanced growth. A primary focus of this scenario is development and improvement of the Downtown through infill mixed-use development, streetscape improvements and transportation system management on Highway 25 to the extent possible. In this scenario Downtown has become the focus and thriving district of the city with new mixed-use, specialty retail and commercial uses, as well as public art installations. This has resulted in a multi -use arts district with enhanced streetscape and pedestrian amenities. Entertainment uses, co -working spaces, restaurants and cafes have also filled in and are thriving. Downtown has also helped spur the development of an outer core area with some new multi -family residential uses. NEW SCHOOL A new school site area is identified in the northwestern portion of the city near Bertram Lakes Regional Park. It is anticipated that residential neighborhoods as described above would fill in around this school and create a new western neighborhood in the city. A small commercial area could also be located here to provide nearby goods and services and complete the neighborhood unit concept. INDUSTRIAL AND EMPLOYMENT A new industrial and employment area is also beginning to develop to the northwest part of the city around the Interstate interchange with Orchard Road. This area has the potential for a range of employment generating uses through a variety of research and development, green technology, manufacturing and warehousing and distribution uses. Another option is for a solar energy generating facility or other renewable energy generating facility, or a combination of renewable energy and employment uses. A small amount of regionally -oriented interchange commercial uses would also be developed here. 60 LAND USE Grow inward by concentrating development activities within the existing city boundaries. Focus on revitalizing downtown and encourage mixed-use development throughout the community in planned areas. Preserve open spaces and sensitive natural areas. Grow into the Orderly Annexation Area when development is proposed or planned, and serviced by available infrastructure systems. COMMUNITY VISION (JANUARY 2020) I HOUSING Create opportunities to retain residents through step-up housing, senior housing and offering a variety of housing types (small lot single-family, townhomes, condominiums, single -story). Find the missing middle. Develop residential densities in the 10-18 units per acre range. Develop middle density housing around the core of downtown and other select areas and focus the highest densities in mixed use projects in the downtown and other focus areas up to 25 units per acre. Encourage and increase the level of home ownership in the city. TRANSPORTATION Complete the planned street network to create alternative options for vehicle traffic. Lobby and continue to support a future Interstate 94 interchange location at Orchard Road. Explore options to improve circulation and safety in the downtown with transportation system management. Create a "complete streets policy" for new and modified streets that balances the needs of automobiles with the needs of bicyclists, pedestrians, and people of all physical abilities. Encourage connectivity throughout the city with a focus between residential neighborhoods, parks, schools and commercial centers. 69 CITY OF MONTICELLO City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 g:' . WSB Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who participated in the development of the Monticello Housing Study, including the Monticello City staff, Wright County Assessor's Office and the various realtors in the community. Completed in coordination with: A BWSB & Associates, Inc. 1 I Page A MontiUcello WSB PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF RESEARCH Housing is an important component of all communities. Housing quality, availability, affordability and diversity enhances the quality of life, supports economic development, and contributes to a community's sense of place. WSB & Associates, Inc. was engaged by the City of Monticello to conduct a Housing Study to assess the housing market conditions and provide recommendations for housing needs within the City of Monticello. The market analysis focused on the housing needs within the City of Monticello including market rate, subsidized, and move - up housing for various age categories including owner -occupied and renter occupied housing options. Monticello's Housing Market Study ("Study") should be used as a reference to guide planning efforts, financial initiatives and strategies, and provide direction to the City regarding the approach it should take; the types of housing opportunities the City should promote, and the roles in providing those opportunities. This Study is intended to be flexible to meet unforeseen housing needs and future land use decisions. It should be noted that the findings presented in this report should not be used to determine the market feasibility of any single development or project; rather, it is designed to be abroad analysis of the entire Monticello housing market and is intended to guide planning efforts, especially as they relate to future land use designations. The Study contains data from both primary and secondary research. Primary research includes interviews with local officials, and the real estate community. Secondary research data includes data from the US Census, American Community Survey, Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), Wright County, Business Analyst', and other local planning agencies. Secondary research is always used as a basis for analysis and is carefully reviewed along with other factors that may impact projections. All the information on pending developments was gathered by WSB & Associates, Inc. and is accurate to the best of our knowledge. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS This section looks at the demographic characteristics that underlie the need for various types of housing in Monticello. The U.S. Census and Business Analyst served as the primary sources for the demographic overview. While population projections are an effective planning tool when used correctly, their accuracy is dependent on several factors including assumptions for birth rates, death rates, migration, and economic conditions. Assumptions are based on past trends and the best information available at the time, but assumptions do not always remain true, and unexpected changes can occur. Therefore, Monticello should use the population projections presented in this Market Study as a general guide and not as an absolute certainty. Moreover, the City should periodically review and update the population projections based upon new conditions. WSB & Associates, Inc. determined the Study Area to be used as comparison points. The area was based on geographic and man-made boundaries, community orientation, our knowledge of the area, and the dictates of the proposal. Considering these factors, we determined a Study Area to include the cities of Monticello, Big Lake, Buffalo, Elk River, Becker, and Rogers. In addition, Wright County and the State ' Business Analyst is a data processing service that uses ESRI technology, U.S. Census data, and American Community Survey data. 2 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB of Minnesota are also included as part of the analysis in the report. Though outside the scope of this report, it is important to note that surrounding communities' populations and available housing stock may affect Monticello's housing market. Figure 1: City of Monticello, MN HISTORIC POPULATION CHANGE The total population of Monticello has grown substantially since the 1980s. Between 1980 and 2010, the City has grown by 597% adding 10,929 new residents, accounting for 18% of the study areas total growth. During the last U.S. Census period (2000-2010), Monticello saw a 38% growth with the addition of 4,891 new residents. Please refer to Table 1-A for further details. 3 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSS Table 1-A: POPULATION CHANGE 1980.2010 Monticello's age distribution has remained relatively consistent from 2000 to 2010 with the largest age group being 25 to 34 in both census periods. The percentage of people 19 and younger decreased from 33.7% to 32.8% while the percentage of those 65 and older increased from 8.9% to 9.8%. Keeping with national trends, the median age increased in Monticello from 2000 to 2010 from 29.8 to 31.6. Please refer to Table 2-A for further details. Table 2-A: MONTICELLO HISTORIC AGE DEMOGRAPHICS 2000-2010 2000 2010 Change Number % Number US Census Total Population 1980-1990 100.0 1990.2000 2000-2010 Under 5 years Place 1980 1990 2000 2010 No. % No. % No. % Monticello 1,830 4,941 7,868 12,759 3,111 170.0% 2,927 59.2% 4,891 62.2% Big Lake 2,210 3,113 6,063 10,060 903 40.9% 2,950 94.8% 3,997 65.9% Buffalo 4,560 6,856 10,097 15,453 2,296 50.4% 3,241 47.3% 5,356 53.0% Elk River I 6,785 11,143 16,447 22,974 4,358 64.2% 5,304 47.6% 6,527 39.7% Becker I 601 902 2,673 4,538 301 50.1% 1,771 196.3% 1,865 69.8% Rogers 652 698 3,588 11,197 46 7.1% 2,890 414.0% 7,609 212.1 A WSB Study Area 16,638 27,653 46,736 76,981 11,015 66.2% 19,083 69.0% 30,245 64.7% Total Wright County 58,681 68,710 89,986 124,700 10,029 17.10% 21,276 30.90% 34,714 38.50 Minnesota 3,806,10 4,075,907 4,375,09 4,919,47 269,804 7.10% 299,19 7.30% 544,38 12.40 3 9 9 2 0 % Source: U.S. Census Bureau Monticello's age distribution has remained relatively consistent from 2000 to 2010 with the largest age group being 25 to 34 in both census periods. The percentage of people 19 and younger decreased from 33.7% to 32.8% while the percentage of those 65 and older increased from 8.9% to 9.8%. Keeping with national trends, the median age increased in Monticello from 2000 to 2010 from 29.8 to 31.6. Please refer to Table 2-A for further details. Table 2-A: MONTICELLO HISTORIC AGE DEMOGRAPHICS 2000-2010 2000 2010 Number % Number % Total Population 7,868 100.0 12759 100.0 Under 5 years 799 10.2 1292 10.1 5 to 9 years 725 9.2 1101 8.6 10 to 14 years 610 7.8 969 7.6 15 to 19 years 511 6.5 823 6.5 20 to 24 years 547 7 731 5.7 25 to 34 years 1,571 20 2255 17.7 35 to 44 years 1,215 15.4 1991 15.6 45 to 54 years 719 9.1 1505 11.8 55 to 59 years 271 3.4 490 7.0 60 to 64 years 202 2.6 395 3.1 65 to 74 years 316 4 584 5.0 75 to 84 years I 260 3.3 394 3.0 85 years and over 122 1.6 229 1.8 Median age (years) 29.8 (X) 31.4 ( X ) Source: U.S. Census Bureau �01[�o 4 1 P a g e A WSB POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS Population projections are an effective planning tool when used correctly. They are based upon assumptions for birth rates, death rates, migration, and economic conditions. In 2010, the U.S. Census reported Monticello's population as 12,759. Monticello's estimated population was 13,568 in 2016, and is projected to increase to 14,383 in 2021. Again, it is impossible to know with certainty what Monticello's future population will be, but it is reasonable to believe that any future population increases resulting from new housing development or redevelopment in Monticello will be offset (to some extent) by population trends resulting from an aging population and diminishing household size. However, based on available data, Monticello's population will likely see a continued increase through year 2021. It is anticipated that Monticello will account for 18.8% of the Study Area's population growth between 2016 and 2021. Monticello's expected rate of population change is roughly equal to the County and double the State. Refer to Table 1-B: Projected Population Change: 2010-2021 for additional information. The City of Monticello has developed its own projections based on building permits and certificates of occupancy over the past two years. The Minnesota State Demographer's 2015 Annual estimate was utilized as base reference point. It indicated the City had 13,311 residents at the end of 2014. During the 2015-2016 time -frame, the City issued permits for 307 additional housing units. Using ESRI's estimated household size of 2.72, this yields an estimated population of 14,146 at the end of 2016. In recognition of the trend of increasing household size and the moderate pace of new residential development and household formation in the City, the projections for the 2017-2021 period indicate an increase of 893 people (2.74 persons per 326 new units or 65 +/- units per year). The annual population increase of 179 is sixteen (16) people higher than ESRI's annual projections based on U.S. Census Bureau data estimates. Again, ESRI's figures appear to have under -accounted for the sizeable number of new units in the community during 2015-2016. Basically, ESRI does not factor in the steady recovery in building permit issuance in this period and applies its projections to a lower beginning population figure than a more realistic number. Refer to Tables 1-C and 2-C for more information. 5 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB TABLE 1-13: PROJECTED POPULATION CHANGE: 2010-2021 Change U.S. Census Bureau 2010-2016 2016-2021 Place 2010 2016 2021 No. % No. % Monticello I 12,759 13,568 14,383 _ 809 6.3% 815 6.0% Big Lake I 10,060 10,629 11,080 569 ' 5.7% 451 4.2% Buffalo I 15,453 16,093 16,699 640 4.1% 606 3.8% Elk River 22,974 23,984 24,891 1,010 4.4% 907 3.8% Becker I 4,538 4,858 5,253 320 7.1% 395 8.1% Rogers 11,197 12,675 13,844 1,478 13.2% 1,169 9.2% Study Area Total 76,981 81,807 86,150 4,826 6.3% 4,343 5.3% 1 Wright County 124,700 132,801 140,895 8,101 6.5% 8,094 6.1% Minnesota 4,919,479 5,541,669 5,720,647 622,190 12.6% 178,978 3.2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The City of Monticello has developed its own projections based on building permits and certificates of occupancy over the past two years. The Minnesota State Demographer's 2015 Annual estimate was utilized as base reference point. It indicated the City had 13,311 residents at the end of 2014. During the 2015-2016 time -frame, the City issued permits for 307 additional housing units. Using ESRI's estimated household size of 2.72, this yields an estimated population of 14,146 at the end of 2016. In recognition of the trend of increasing household size and the moderate pace of new residential development and household formation in the City, the projections for the 2017-2021 period indicate an increase of 893 people (2.74 persons per 326 new units or 65 +/- units per year). The annual population increase of 179 is sixteen (16) people higher than ESRI's annual projections based on U.S. Census Bureau data estimates. Again, ESRI's figures appear to have under -accounted for the sizeable number of new units in the community during 2015-2016. Basically, ESRI does not factor in the steady recovery in building permit issuance in this period and applies its projections to a lower beginning population figure than a more realistic number. Refer to Tables 1-C and 2-C for more information. 5 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB TABLE 1-C: MONTICELLO HOUSING PERMITS & POPULATION FORECAST CALCULATIONS Year: Single -Family Single -Family Multifamily Total 14,146 15,039 Detached Attached 13,568 14,383 163 2010 2 0 0 2 2011 2 0 0 2 2012 22 0 0 22 2013 49 3 0 52 2014 70 3 0 73 2015 38 6 136 180 2016 61 0 66 127 Average Total 244 12 202 458 65.2 per year POPULATION FORECAST CALCULATIONS Time -Frame New Housing Average HH Size New Residents 2014 Pop End of 2016 Pop Units (Permits x HH Size) 2015-2016 1 307 2.72 835 13,311 14,146 ' Time -Frame New Housing Average HH Size New Residents 2016 Pop End of 2021 Pop Units (Permits x HH Size) 2017-2021 326 (65.2 x 5) 2.74 893 14,146 15,039 Source: City of Monticello, Minnesota State Demographer TABLE 2-C: POPULATION PROJECTION DIFFERENCE HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS AND FORECASTS In 2010, the US Census reported 4,693 households in Monticello and 3,164 families. A household refers to a housing unit occupied by at least one person. A household can involve a family living in a housing unit or it can involve unrelated people sharing an apartment or housing unit. A family refers to a household consisting of a householder and one or more other people related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. In the future, it is likely that the percentage of married couples without children living with them will increase. The percentage of single parent households will also increase. Family households with no spouse present accounted for approximately 30% of the family households in Monticello in 2010. The average household size in Monticello in 2000 was 2.64 persons compared to 2.68 in 2010 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. These figures were projected to increase, according to ESRI, to 2.72 in 2016 and 2.74 by 2021. According to the American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, Monticello has seen a decrease in family households, a decrease in households with children under the age of 18, and an increase in non -family households (see Table 1-D: Household Occupancy Characteristics for further details). These trends held true from 2009-2014 aside from an outlying year (2014 - highlighted in gray on Table 1-D) when there was an increase in family households, an increase in families with children, and a decrease in nonfamily households. This may have been caused by an increased availability of single- family housing units. These trends have implications for the demand of future housing types in Monticello. Since the average household size is projected to decrease and the trend of family households has been decreasing, a shift in demand will likely occur less for 3-4 bedroom, single-family homes and more for smaller housing units, and multi -family units. 6 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB 2016 2021 Annual Growth City of Monticello 14,146 15,039 179 ESRI 13,568 14,383 163 Difference 578 656 16 Source: ESRI forecasts, The City of Monticello HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS AND FORECASTS In 2010, the US Census reported 4,693 households in Monticello and 3,164 families. A household refers to a housing unit occupied by at least one person. A household can involve a family living in a housing unit or it can involve unrelated people sharing an apartment or housing unit. A family refers to a household consisting of a householder and one or more other people related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. In the future, it is likely that the percentage of married couples without children living with them will increase. The percentage of single parent households will also increase. Family households with no spouse present accounted for approximately 30% of the family households in Monticello in 2010. The average household size in Monticello in 2000 was 2.64 persons compared to 2.68 in 2010 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. These figures were projected to increase, according to ESRI, to 2.72 in 2016 and 2.74 by 2021. According to the American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, Monticello has seen a decrease in family households, a decrease in households with children under the age of 18, and an increase in non -family households (see Table 1-D: Household Occupancy Characteristics for further details). These trends held true from 2009-2014 aside from an outlying year (2014 - highlighted in gray on Table 1-D) when there was an increase in family households, an increase in families with children, and a decrease in nonfamily households. This may have been caused by an increased availability of single- family housing units. These trends have implications for the demand of future housing types in Monticello. Since the average household size is projected to decrease and the trend of family households has been decreasing, a shift in demand will likely occur less for 3-4 bedroom, single-family homes and more for smaller housing units, and multi -family units. 6 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB TABLE 1-D: HOUSEHOLD OCCUPANCY CHARACTERISTICS - 2009-2014 2014 68.8 43. Source: American Community Survey 5 -year Estimates Between 2010 and 2016, the number of new households (4,693 and 4,936 respectively) has grown proportionally to the increase in population (12,759 and 13,568 respectively) suggesting stability in household size (see Table I -E: Historic and Projected Households: 2010-2021). The number of households in Monticello is projected to increase by 5.3% by 2021 accounting for 18.2% of the study area's projected household growth. Place Monticello Big Lake Buffalo Elk River Becker Rogers Study Area Total Wright County Minnesota 1-E: HISTORIC AND PROJECTED HOUSEHOLDS: 2010-2021 Family Family with Children Nonfamily 1 -person 2 -person 3 -person 4 -or -more -person 2009 72.2% 47.0% 27.8% 22.0% 29.8% 18.8% 29.4% 2010 69.6% 46.4% 30.4% 25.1% 25.8% 18.6% 30.6% 2011 68.5% 45.3% 31.5% 25.8% 26.9% 16.9% 30.9% 2012 66.8% 43.8% 33.2% 26.5% 25.3% 19.1% 29.1% 2013 ' 66.2% 42.3% 33.8% 27.0% 27.0% 16.4% 29.6% 2014 68.8 43. Source: American Community Survey 5 -year Estimates Between 2010 and 2016, the number of new households (4,693 and 4,936 respectively) has grown proportionally to the increase in population (12,759 and 13,568 respectively) suggesting stability in household size (see Table I -E: Historic and Projected Households: 2010-2021). The number of households in Monticello is projected to increase by 5.3% by 2021 accounting for 18.2% of the study area's projected household growth. Place Monticello Big Lake Buffalo Elk River Becker Rogers Study Area Total Wright County Minnesota 1-E: HISTORIC AND PROJECTED HOUSEHOLDS: 2010-2021 _TABLE Change US Census 2010-2016 2016-2021 2010 2016 2021 No. % No. % 4,693 5,136* 5,399 443' 8.6% 263 4.9% 3,377 3,566 3,720 189 5.6% 154 4.3% 5,700 5,872 6,058 172 3.0% 186 3.2% 8,080 8,452 8,780 372 4.6% 328 3.9% 1,526 1,635 1,772 109 7.1% 137 8.4% 3,748 4,232 4,610 484 12.9% 378 8.9% 27,124 28,893 30,339 1,769 6.1% 1,446 4.8% 44,473 46,817 49,383 2,344 5.3% 2,566 5.5% 2,087,227 2,176,475 2,258,733 89,248 4.3% 82,258 3.8% *The 200 occupied units of the new IRET Apartment Complex were accounted for here. Note: There is potential for household growth to exceed these projections based on the housing market's recovery from the Great Recession. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts, WSB & Associates 7 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB AGE COMPOSITION & IMPACT ON HOUSING In addition to knowing how many people currently live and will likely live in Monticello, an understanding of the population's age composition can help the City plan for and provide necessary and desired services for its residents. The following provides an overview of the existing age composition of Monticello's residents and the anticipated changes in age composition that will occur through the year 2021 (see Table 1-F: Age Composition 2010-2021). Composition will remain relatively consistent outside of a slight decrease in the 25-34 age category (by 2.1%) and slight increase in the 55-64 age category (by 2.5%) which reflects aging baby boomers and a smaller succeeding generation. Extrapolating further past year 2021, Monticello can expect a surge of 7,438 residents entering the over - sixty -five (65) age group as is indicated by the red box in Table I -F. The age cohort closest to age sixty- five (65) typically is comfortable downsizing their living situation. This is a substantial number of households who will be causing the demand in housing types to change in Monticello for future years as current projections do not have a corresponding offset in future age groups. TABLE 1-F: AGE COMPOSITION 2010-2021 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts HOUSING SUPPLY Number and Types of Housing Units The US Census indicates that there were 4,693 households in Monticello in 2010: 1,749 more units than identified in 2000 (2,944). Data describing the household type, as shown below in Table I -E, was only available as an estimate. The most recent data is from the 2014 American Community Survey. Roughly, 54.5% of the housing units in 2014 were single-family detached houses: this is considerably lower than Wright County (76.4%) and lower than the State of Minnesota (67.2%). In 2014, roughly 18.2% of the housing units in Monticello were single-family attached units (townhouses): this is almost double the figure for Wright County (9.8%) and much higher than the State (7.5%). In 2014, the City also had a considerably higher percentage of multi -family housing than Wright County but was consistent with the State of Minnesota. Refer to Table I -G: Housing Supply by Type - 2014, for more information. 8 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSS 2010 2016 2021 Age I Number % Number % Number % Age 0-4 I 1,292 10.1% 1,206 8.90% 1,293 9.00% Age 5-9 I 1,101 8.6% 1,150 8.50% 1,226 8.50% Age 10 -14 I 969 7.6% 1,033 7.60% 1,163 8.10% Age 15 -19 I 823 6.5% 924 6.80% 949 6.60% Age 20 - 24 I 731 5.7% 901 6.60% 903 6.30% Age 25 - 34 I 2,255 17.7% 1,968 14.50% 2,246 15.60% Age 35 - 44 I 1,991 15.6% 2,065 15.20% 2,157 15.00% Age 45 - 54 I 1,505 11.8% 1,771 13.10% 1,682 11.70% Age 55 - 64 I 885 6.9% 1,240 9.10% 1353 9.40% Age 65 - 74 584 4.6% 751 5.50% 836 5.80% Age 75 - 84 394 3.1% 372 ' 2.70% 404 2.80% Age 85+ 229 1.8% 185 1.40% 171 1.20% Median Age 31.6 33.1 32.3 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts HOUSING SUPPLY Number and Types of Housing Units The US Census indicates that there were 4,693 households in Monticello in 2010: 1,749 more units than identified in 2000 (2,944). Data describing the household type, as shown below in Table I -E, was only available as an estimate. The most recent data is from the 2014 American Community Survey. Roughly, 54.5% of the housing units in 2014 were single-family detached houses: this is considerably lower than Wright County (76.4%) and lower than the State of Minnesota (67.2%). In 2014, roughly 18.2% of the housing units in Monticello were single-family attached units (townhouses): this is almost double the figure for Wright County (9.8%) and much higher than the State (7.5%). In 2014, the City also had a considerably higher percentage of multi -family housing than Wright County but was consistent with the State of Minnesota. Refer to Table I -G: Housing Supply by Type - 2014, for more information. 8 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSS TABLE 1-G: HOUSING SUPPLY BY TYPE - 2014 Housing Type Monticello Monticello Wright County Wright County State State 2021 Units % Units % Units % Single -Family 2,663 54.5% 37,715 76.4% 1,589,773 67.2% Detached Single -Family 889 18.2% 4,863 9.8% 176,173 7.5% Attached 2-4 Unit Multi- 123 2.5% 799 1.6% 104,411 4.4% Family 5+ Unit Multi- 787 16.1% 3,609 7.3% 410,648 17.4% Family Mobile Home 422 8.6% 2,335 4.7% 82,441 3.5% Other - 0.0% 50 0.1% 703 0.0% Total Units 1 4,884 100% 49,371 100% 2,364,149 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates Comparison and Forecast of Owner -Occupied and Renter -Occupied Units It is important to have a balance of owner -occupied and renter -occupied units. In general, many communities strive to have roughly 65-70% of their housing units owner -occupied and 30-35% renter occupied. In 2010, approximately 68% of the housing units in Monticello were owner -occupied; this is slightly lower than Wright County (75%), and about the same as the State of Minnesota (68%). During 2016, the City of Monticello's housing occupancy ratio (owner: renter) has changed slightly, with 69% of the housing units being owner occupied and 25% being renter occupied. In 2021, the housing occupancy ratio is forecasted to remain consistent with past trends. Refer to Table 1-H.• Housing Tenure by Type - 2010, for additional information. Please be aware that there is roughly a 6% gap between owner occupied housing units and renter occupied housing units; this gap will be addressed in the following section. TABLE 1-H: HOUSING TENURE - 2010 Vacancies 2021 Renter Occupied Housing Units % 2010 2016 2021 26.2% 25.3% 24.9% 14.9% 15.8% 15.9% 24.0% 24.8% 24.9% Today, the City of Monticello faces an overall housing vacancy rate of 6.0%, which is 3.4% lower than the vacancy rate for Wright County, and 5.2% lower than that of the State. Monticello's vacancy rate has increased by 0.4% since 2010 and is projected to increase by 1% in 2021 which will still be significantly lower than the County and State. Both the County and State are projected to remain consistent through year 2021. The increase of vacant housing units in Monticello can partly be explained by the fact that the number of housing units in the City increased by nearly 6% from 2010-2016, and the housing market experienced a significant decline. Please see Table 1-1 for further details. 9 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB Owner Occupied Housing Units % Location: 2010 2016 2021 Monticello I 68.2% 68.7% 68.1% Wright County 75.8% 74.7% 74.7% State of MN 64.9% 64.0% 63.9% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts Vacancies 2021 Renter Occupied Housing Units % 2010 2016 2021 26.2% 25.3% 24.9% 14.9% 15.8% 15.9% 24.0% 24.8% 24.9% Today, the City of Monticello faces an overall housing vacancy rate of 6.0%, which is 3.4% lower than the vacancy rate for Wright County, and 5.2% lower than that of the State. Monticello's vacancy rate has increased by 0.4% since 2010 and is projected to increase by 1% in 2021 which will still be significantly lower than the County and State. Both the County and State are projected to remain consistent through year 2021. The increase of vacant housing units in Monticello can partly be explained by the fact that the number of housing units in the City increased by nearly 6% from 2010-2016, and the housing market experienced a significant decline. Please see Table 1-1 for further details. 9 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB TABLE 1-I: VACANT HOUSING FORCAST & COMPARISION — 2010-2021 Year City Vacant Units City Percent Vacant County Percent Vacant State Percent Vacant 2010 I 280 5.6% 9.2% 11.1% 2016 I 315 6.0% 9.4% 11.2% 2021 391 7.0% 9.4% 11.2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The rental housing average vacancy rate is low in Monticello but is projected to increase indicating a demand for addition rental units at all levels of affordability. Table 2-1 indicates specific vacancy rates for eight of the rental properties in the City. TABLE 2-I: RENTAL APARTMENTS — VACANCIES AND RATES Value of Housing The median value of owner -occupied housing units in Monticello in 2016 was $179,095 and is projected to increase by $30,314 in 2021. Most housing in Monticello is valued in the range of $150,000 to $199,999, which is consistent with the County and State. In comparison to low and moderate valued housing, there is a relatively limited choice of higher valued housing units in Monticello. Only 16.5% of owner -occupied housing units have a value of $250,000 or greater compared to 38.8% in the County and 36.7% in the State. The median value of owner -occupied housing in Wright County was $216,395 and $205,288 in the State of Minnesota. Monticello needs to focus on later -stage housing opportunities to meet the demand for higher valued housing units. Refer to Table I -J.• Owner -Occupied Housing by Value -2016 for additional information. Table 24 illustrates the affect that the Great Recession had on housing values in Monticello. Note that median sale price fell below median appraised value in mid -2007, then recovered and surpassed appraised value in 201 Ito regain a more traditional relationship. Data from Table 24 came from the Wright County Assessor. MontiUcello lO1Page WSB Vacancy Rates Ridgemont Apartments 0.0% $566-$610 River Park View Apartments 0.0% 30% of income Ridgway Apartments 2.3% $460-$725 Hillside Terrace 0.0% 30% of income Cedar Crest Apartments 0.0% 30% of income Broadway Square 0.0% 30% of income 7th Street Townhomes 6.7% $825 Monticello Crossings* 1.0% $925 - $2,210 Monticello Village 3.3% $1,018—$1,610 Average Vacancy Rate 1.5% * 202 -unit IRET Apartment Complex built in 2016 Source: WSB & Associates Phone Interviews Value of Housing The median value of owner -occupied housing units in Monticello in 2016 was $179,095 and is projected to increase by $30,314 in 2021. Most housing in Monticello is valued in the range of $150,000 to $199,999, which is consistent with the County and State. In comparison to low and moderate valued housing, there is a relatively limited choice of higher valued housing units in Monticello. Only 16.5% of owner -occupied housing units have a value of $250,000 or greater compared to 38.8% in the County and 36.7% in the State. The median value of owner -occupied housing in Wright County was $216,395 and $205,288 in the State of Minnesota. Monticello needs to focus on later -stage housing opportunities to meet the demand for higher valued housing units. Refer to Table I -J.• Owner -Occupied Housing by Value -2016 for additional information. Table 24 illustrates the affect that the Great Recession had on housing values in Monticello. Note that median sale price fell below median appraised value in mid -2007, then recovered and surpassed appraised value in 201 Ito regain a more traditional relationship. Data from Table 24 came from the Wright County Assessor. MontiUcello lO1Page WSB Value Less than $50,000 $50,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 to $249,999 $250,000 to $299,999 $300,000 to $399,999 $400,000 to $499,99 $500,000 to $749,999 $750,000 to $999,999 $1,000,000 or More Median Value Source: ESRI Forecasts $210,000 $200,000 $190,000 $180,000 $170,000 $160,000 $150,000 $140,000 $130,000 TABLE 1-J: OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING BY VALUE - 2016 City Units City % Wright County % State % 411 11.4% 6.5% 6.5% 240 6.7% 4.8% 9.4% 407 11.3% 11.8% 14.7% 1282 35.5% 21.4% 17.9% 672 18.6% 16.7% 14.7% 269 7.5% 11.5% 10.3% 217 6.0% 13.2% 12.2% 65 1.8% 6.4% 6.1% 18 0.5% 4.5% 4.9% 22 0.6% 1.8% 1.9% 5 0.1% 1.4% 1.3% $179,095 $216,395 $205,288 CHART 24 MONTICELLO HOUSING VALUES THOUGH THE GREAT RECESSION 11i413Ii413Bi4139413[l4911114�411V Median Sale Median Appraised Owner Monthly Costs as Percentage of Household Income Housing decisions should not be based solely on the value of housing, but also the cost of housing expenses in relation to household income. In general, housing costs (taxes, insurance, principal, interest, etc.) should not exceed 30% of total household income. In 2014, only 19% of homeowners in Monticello had monthly costs that were more than 30% of their household income, compared to 27% in Wright County and 29% in the State of Minnesota (see Table 1-K• Owner Monthly Costs as Percent of Household Income -2014). These figures suggest that housing was more affordable in Monticello than in Wright County and the State of Minnesota in 2014 possibly due to age and livability of housing units. This is an important strength for the City as it continues to grow and evolve into a regional center linking the Twin Cities Metro with the St. Cloud MSA. Monticello should consider a goal to maintain appropriate amounts of affordable housing to mitigate the negative impacts of a housing price correction like that seen during the Great Recession (2007-2010). This will allow for the community to see steady and modestly increasing home values and reduce the 11 IPage A MontiUcello WSS likelihood of rapidly increasing home prices causing homeowners to be required to spend a larger portion of their income on housing. While the provision of affordable housing is one side of the coin, the City should also incorporate a plan to encourage the development and attraction of livable wage employment opportunities in the City. TABLE 1-K: OWNER MONTHLY COSTS AS PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME - 2014 Percent of Household Income City Units* City % County % State % Less than 20% 1,286 47.0% 39.0% 41.3% 20.0 to 24.9% 611 22.3% 18.9% 17.8% 25.0 to 29.9% I 611 11.4% 14.8% 12.3% 30.0 to 34.9% I 169 6.2% 7.6% 7.9% 35.0% or More I 361 13.2% 19.6% 20.8% Total I 2,738 100% 100% 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey *Housing Units with a Mortgage Contract Rent In 2014, rental housing units accounted for roughly 25% of the occupied housing units in Monticello. In 2014, roughly 88% of units had a monthly rent of $500 or more, which is higher than Wright County (87%), and the State of Minnesota (79%). See Table I -L: Renter -Occupied Housing Units by Gross Rent - 2010, for additional information. Monthly Rent Less than $200 $200 to $299 $300 to $499 $500 to $749 $750 to $999 $1000 to $1,499 $1,500 or more No Rent Paid Median Rent Paid TABLE 1-L: RENTER -OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY GROSS RENT - 2014 Total Specified Units 1 1,175 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey 7,106 100% 590,136 100% Renter Monthly Costs as Percentage of Household Income In 2014, 46.5% of renters paid over 30% of their household income in rent (see Table I -M.• Gross Rent as Percent of Household Income - 2014). This number is slightly lower than Wright County (47.7%) but higher than the State of Minnesota (46.1 %). This suggests that there is not an abundance of affordable rental units in Monticello and efforts should be made to decrease rental costs. MontiUcello 121Page WSB City County i State Units % Units % Units % 23 2.0% 141 2.0% 24,764 4.2% 57 4.9% 233 3.3% 31,166 5.3% 66 5.6% 582 8.2% 68,601 11.6% 367 31.2% 2136 30.1% 159,802 27.1% 322 27.4% 2012 28.3% 139,386 23.6% 306 26.0% 1514 21.3% 105,182 17.8% 34 2.9% 188 2.6% 34,297 5.8% 0 0.0% 300 4.2% 27,938 4.7% $773 $778 $747 Total Specified Units 1 1,175 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey 7,106 100% 590,136 100% Renter Monthly Costs as Percentage of Household Income In 2014, 46.5% of renters paid over 30% of their household income in rent (see Table I -M.• Gross Rent as Percent of Household Income - 2014). This number is slightly lower than Wright County (47.7%) but higher than the State of Minnesota (46.1 %). This suggests that there is not an abundance of affordable rental units in Monticello and efforts should be made to decrease rental costs. MontiUcello 121Page WSB TABLE 1-M: GROSS RENT AS A PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME - 2014 Percent of Household Income Units Percent Wright County State Less than 10% 0 0.0% 3.2% 3.5% 10 to 14.9% I 73 6.2% 8.1% 8.2% 15 to 19.9% I 205 17.4% 13.6% 12.3% 20 to 24.9% 262 22.3% 13.1% 12.5% 25 to 29.9% 72 6.1% 9.1% 11.4% 30 to 34.9% I 194 16.5% 9.7% 8.8% 35 to 39.9% I 86 7.3% 8.1% 6.1% 40 to 49.9% I 102 8.7% 9.8% 8.1% 50.0% or More I 164 14.0% 20.1% 23.1% Not Computed 17 1.4% 5.2% 6.0% Total Specified Units 1,175 100% 100% 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey Age and Maintenance of Housing Stock In 2014, roughly 39% (1,910 units) of the City's units were constructed before 1990 (greater than 27 years old). Just 5.4% of the housing units in Monticello were built before 1939. Monticello has a relatively new housing stock in comparison to Wright County and the State of Minnesota, with 60.8% of housing units being built since 1990 compared with 50.4% for the County and 29.0% for the State. TABLE 1-N: YEAR STUCTURE BUILT Year Structure Built Monticello Units 2010 or later 0 2000 to 2009 I 1,697 1990 to 1999 I 1,277 1980 to 1989 I 748 1970 to 1979 I 654 1960 to 1969 I 63 1950 to 1959 96 1940 to 1949 86 1939 or Earlier 263 Total Specified Units 4,884 Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey MontiUcello Percent Wright County State 0.0% 0.7% 0.8% 34.7 32.2% 14.6% 26.1% 18.5% 13.6% 15.3% 12.2% 13.0% 13.4% 16.0% 15.6% 1.3% 4.9% 9.8% 2.0% 4.1% 10.4% 1.8% 2.3% 4.8% 5.4% 9.2% 17.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 131Page WSS LIFE -CYCLE HOUSING AND PROFILE OF HOUSEHOLDS The housing needs of a community relate to the demographic profile of the household. Typically, households move through several life -cycle stages; including entry-level households, first time homeowners, move -up buyers, empty nesters/young seniors, and senior citizens. The following describes each of these household types and the effect that they have on housing demands in Monticello. Entry -Level Households People in the 18 to 24 -year-old age group typically leave their childhood home and establish their own household. They often rent a house or an apartment because they generally do not have the income and savings needed to buy a home. In addition, many people in this age group move frequently, so they are hesitant to buy a house. They are also more likely to share housing with other unrelated people of similar age. The entry-level household population in Monticello will fluctuate annually. Many Monticello residents that graduate from high school move to other communities to attend a university or to pursue other job opportunities. In the long term, unless current conditions and trends change, Monticello is projected to see a 0.5% decrease in the 15 to 24 -year-old age group by year 2021 (Table 1-T). Job opportunities aimed at retaining this age cohort need to be strongly considered. Nevertheless, there will always be a strong need to provide affordable housing for people of all ages. First -Time Homeowners First time homeowners are typically in their 20s and 30s. They are usually "move -up" renters, meaning they "move up" from an apartment to a home. They are often married with young children, but increasingly, first time homeowners are single. They are prone to moving within several years of buying their first home for several reasons; including, increased salaries allow them to move to more expensive housing, children may require larger housing, and job opportunities may require that they move to another community. Monticello is projected to see a 0.3% increase in the 20-442 age group by year 2021 (Table I- T), which could translate into an increased demand for lower -end housing units. Move -Up Buyers Move -up buyers are typically in their 30s and 40s. They move up from the smaller, less expensive house that they had previously purchased. From an economic growth perspective, this is an important age group of people. Typically, move -up buyers have children in school and an established career. They are less likely to move to another community and start over. Also, professionals who are moving to a community to advance their career are generally looking to move to a more expensive house than what they had in their previous community. Monticello is projected to see a 0.5% decrease in the 25-543 age group by the year 2021 (Table I -F). This is 0.3% lower than the study area average of a 0.8% decrease. This may be an indicator that there is a shortage of available units for move -up buyers. Monticello must continue to 2 People in their 40s were included due to U.S. Census age groups. 3 People in their 20s and 50s were included due to U.S. Census age groups. MontiUcello 141Page A WSS ensure that it has adequate choices for those who are looking for move -up housing that will satisfy their needs until they are in their 50s and beyond. Empty Nesters and Young Seniors Empty nesters and young seniors are generally in their 50s, 60s, and early 70s. Often, their children have moved out of their house and left them with a larger house than needed. Empty nesters and young seniors often want to live in a smaller home, like a townhouse or patio home, that has less maintenance. The baby boom generation in Monticello is projected to increase by 0.6% by year 2021 (Table 1-F). A notable increase in apartment rentals in Monticello by members of this population segment is likely to occur. A large portion of these individuals will likely desire higher -end apartment complexes with quality amenities so they can maintain their current lifestyles. Senior Citizens This age group is generally in their late 70s and older and are often looking for low maintenance or assisted living housing. As the population ages, Monticello must continually ensure that it has adequate housing to meet the needs of seniors. The City is projected to see a 0.1% decrease in the 75 and older age group by year 2021 (Table 1-F). Monticello should continue to strive to be a senior -friendly community that values the contributions of seniors, promotes positive intergenerational interactions, considers the needs of seniors in community planning, supports the efforts of seniors to live independently, and acknowledges the role that family, friends, and neighbors play in the life of seniors. Special Needs Housing for those with special needs includes housing for those with mental and/or physical disabilities or health issues and those who need temporary or transitional housing. The number of people with special housing needs is expected to increase as the population of Monticello continues to age and grow. Senior Housing Market Monticello City staff members have identified a need for senior housing market analysis. Based upon population growth forecasts, household forecasts, and the current age of householders, we can extrapolate what the senior housing market will require. Table 1-0: Senior Housing Projections 2010-2021 illustrates how the change in the sixty-five and older population will affect the number of occupied housing units. By year 2021, Monticello will need 940 units suitable for senior residents to meet demand, which is an increase of 136 units from 2010. We consider senior housing to be any housing unit (affordable, renter, duplex, patio house, etc.) that meets the needs of residents sixty-five (65) and older. MontiUcello 151Page A WSS TABLE 1.0: SENIOR HOUSING PROJECTIONS — 2010-2021 Year 2010 2016 2021 Total Population 12,759 13,568 14,383 Total Occupied Units I 4,693 4,936 5,199 65+ Population I 1,207 1,308 1,411 65+ Population Percent I 9.5% 9.6% 9.8% Units Occupied by 65+ Population I 804 871 940 Percentage of Units Occupied by 65+ Population 1 17.1% 17.7% 18.1% Source: U.S. Census, ESRI Forecasts, WSB & Associates AFFORDABLE HOUSING Affordable housing is important to a strong economy and a healthy community. Increasingly, housing is not affordable for many working families and the lack of affordable housing for people of all ages and incomes causes families stress, dampens productivity and stifles job growth. Various organizations define "affordable housing" in many ways. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) generally defines housing as affordable if it costs less than thirty (30) percent of a household's income. However, HUD's Section 8 Income Guidelines are the basis for most affordable housing programs. Section 8 guidelines define low and moderate incomes on a sliding scale, depending on the number of persons in the family. For example, a four -person household is considered "moderate income" if their family income is eighty (80) percent of the area's median family income. Most housing affordability programs and data place emphasis on creating owner -occupied units at eighty (80) percent of the median family income (moderate income) and rental units at fifty (50) percent of the median family income (low income). Since low income persons are typically renters, the definition of "low income" is tied to the number of persons in each unit. This study identifies "affordable owner occupied units" as those affordable for moderate income families (eighty (80) percent of median income). Affordable rental units are based on fifty (50) percent of the median income and reflected on a per capita and per family basis. It is very important to note that the definition of "affordable" in terms of a dollar amount will continue to change as the cost of living increases and interest rates change. Therefore, the City should periodically review income/housing statistics and update the definition as warranted. Factors such as interest rates will impact housing affordability in both a positive and negative manner. Income by Age of Householder Looking at income data is also important when predicting future housing demands in the City of Monticello. In 2010, the median household income in Monticello was $68,135 ($67,963 in the County) and the largest employment industries were educational, health and social services, manufacturing, and retail trade. By 2016, the median household income increased significantly to approximately $76,954 ($73,798 in the County) and the top employment industries were the same. Monticello's median household income is projected to increase to $85,218 by 2021 ($83,257 in the County) according to ESRI Business Analyst. MontiUcello 161Page WSB Income distributions as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau can be compared to affordability standards to determine how many households and families in the City of Monticello may require affordable housing. Table I -P: Monticello Affordable Housing Units Requirements - 2016 & 2021 depicts the number of households (renter and owner) that may require affordable housing (based on family income). The gray shaded area indicates family incomes of 80% or less of the median household income ($61,449 in 2016 and $68,174 in 2021). The red box indicates family incomes of 50% or less of the median household income ($38,406 in 2016 and $42,609 in 2021). By 2021, 2,214 owner households may require affordable housing, and 1,629 renter households may require affordable housing. TABLE 1-P: MONTICELLO AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS - 2016 & 2021 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The following table illustrated the maximum affordable housing costs for renters and owners based on median income. A direct relationship exists between monthly affordable housing costs and median income. Steps should be taken in Monticello to keep housing costs affordable as housing values increase such as maintaining current affordable housing stock and assuring opportunities for the construction of new affordable housing units. TABLE 1-Q: MAXIMUM AFFORDABLE HOUSING COSTS (RENTER & OWNER) - 2016 & 2021 2016 Renter 2021 Owner Annual Household Number of Households % of Total Number of Households % of Total Income $76,811 $85,218 $76,811 $85,218 Less than $15,000 378 7.7% 411 7.9% $15,000 to $24,999 I 286 5.8% 271 5.2% $25,000 to $34,999 332 6.7% 316 6.1% $35,000 to $49,999 543 11.0% 631 12.1% $50,000 to $74,999 834 16.9% am 512 9.8°JL $75,000 to $99,999 887 18.0% 937 18.0% $100,000 to $149,999 1,262 25.6% 1,564 30.1% $150,000 to $199,999 341 6.9% 472 9.1% $200,000 and over 74 1.5% 85 1.6% Total Households 4,937 100% 5,199 100% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The following table illustrated the maximum affordable housing costs for renters and owners based on median income. A direct relationship exists between monthly affordable housing costs and median income. Steps should be taken in Monticello to keep housing costs affordable as housing values increase such as maintaining current affordable housing stock and assuring opportunities for the construction of new affordable housing units. TABLE 1-Q: MAXIMUM AFFORDABLE HOUSING COSTS (RENTER & OWNER) - 2016 & 2021 MontiUcello 171Page WSB Renter Owner Year 2016 2021 2016 2021 Median Income $76,811 $85,218 $76,811 $85,218 Affordable Income: 50% Renter, 80% Owner $38,406 $42,609 $61,448.80 $68,174.40 30% of Affordable $11,522 $12,783 $18,434.64 $20,452.32 Income Monthly Housing Cost I $960 $1,065 $1,536.22 $1,704.36 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts MontiUcello 171Page WSB OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS This section analyses the City of Monticello's owner occupied housing market. Analyzed in this section are single-family home resale trends, home foreclosures, actively marketing subdivisions, pending subdivisions, interviews with local real estate professionals and others involved in the local housing market to gain their feedback on existing market conditions and trends. The Wright County Assessor's Office provided data on resale trends. The following are key findings regarding the owner -occupied housing market. Home Resale Trends The average resale price of single-family homes in Monticello in 2016 was $202,073 and there were 342 sales. This was an increase in price from 2015 ($169,025 and 266 sales). While some of the price changes from year to year can be attributed to the age and quality of the homes sold during a year, an interview with a realty expert indicated the average resale price likely bottomed out in 2011 and slow price appreciation is expected to continue to bring prices back to a more market -neutral level. Median sale price is often a more reliable measure of price trends. In Monticello, the median sale price of single- family homes increased from $171,500 in 2015 to $185,269 in 2016, which reflects an increase of 8% for that period. TABLE 1-R: RE -SALE TRENDS OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES Year Number of Sales Median Sale Price Average Sale Price 2015 266 $171,500 $ 169,025 2016 342 185,269 $ 202,073 Source: Wright County Assessor's Office; WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 1-S shows the number of home sales in 2016 by the decade the homes were built. In 2016, 181 of the 342 (52.9%) single-family homes sold were built during year 2000 or later. Similarly, Table 1-N showed that approximately 34.7% of Monticello's owner -occupied single-family homes were built after 2000. Only 11.7% of the sales in 2016 were homes built prior to 1980. This highlights the relatively large supply of newer homes available to potential new residents moving to the community. Table I -S also highlights how the median sale price decreases as the homes get older. Most homes sold in Monticello in 2016 for under $170,000 were built before 1980. Homes priced above $180,000 were generally built since 2000. TABLE 1-S: HOME SALES BY DECADE BUILT 2016 Decade I Number of Sales Percentage Median Sale Price 1970 and Older I 27 7.9% $151,509 1971-1980 13 3.8% $166,000 1981-1990 I 23 6.7% $157,500 1991-2000 I 98 28.7% $181,467 2001-2010 I 132 38.6% $193,951 2010-2016 49 14.3% $221,050 Total: I 342 100.0% Source: Wright County Assessor's Office �01[�o 18Page A WSB Foreclosures Beginning in the middle of the last decade, home foreclosures began to have a significant impact on housing markets across the nation. Initially, most foreclosures occurred among buyers with lower credit ratings who had sub -prime mortgages. Gradually, foreclosure activity increased as jobs plummeted and home prices sank precipitously. Foreclosures have gradually decreased over the past few years as housing markets have stabilized. Table I -T presents foreclosure data for Wright County and Minnesota. The data are considered "Sheriff's Sales Foreclosures" and was compiled by the Minnesota Homeownership Center and published on their website. There were 7,212 foreclosures in Minnesota in 2015. This was down from 8,313 in 2014 and significantly lower than 11,834 in 2013. Wright County had 205 foreclosures in 2015, down from 240 in 2014 and 372 in 2013. Wright County has maintained a higher foreclosure rate than Minnesota. The foreclosure rate, as shown in Table 1-T, is defined as the number of foreclosed mortgages as a percent of total residential parcels. In 2015, Wright County's foreclosure rate was 0.49% compared to 0.40% in Minnesota. Foreclosures have hindered Wright County's housing market as they have other areas of the State. Out of 87 counties in the State, only 6 had a higher foreclosure count than Wright County. Those counties were Saint Louis, Washington, Dakota, Anoka, Ramsey, and Hennepin. TABLE 1-T: HOME FORECLOSURES WRIGHT COUNTY, 2013 to 2015 Sources: Minnesota Homeownership Center, HousingLink Single -Family Listings Based on a review of various Realtor websites, there were 77 single-family homes actively listed for sale in Monticello in November 2016. The homes were unevenly distributed by price range; weighted heavier toward higher priced homes. Only two (2) homes were priced below $120,000 and 68 priced $150,000 or higher listed for sale. Four (4) homes were listed for sale between $100,000 and $150,000. The average list price of homes on the market was $271,759 in November 2016. While homes typically sell for less than the list prices, the current prices suggest that Monticello should continue to see appreciation in home prices since the low point in 2011. Existing Lot Supply There are currently a limited number of lots available to accommodate new single-family homes in Monticello. The City is experiencing a shortage in buildable lots as bank owned lots have been purchased and developed. As of the end of 2016, there are a total of 74 single-family lots and sites that can accommodate up to 101 multi -family units. Permit numbers have steadily recovered from the 2010 and 2011 low point (two single family permits issued each year) to the issuance of 61 single-family permits in 2016. Prior to the recession, the City issued more than 300 permits annually. During that time (2002- 2007) housing lots were selling in the $70,000490,000 range. The sale price of lots fell by more than 80% after the recession. Bank foreclosures of developers resulted in existing lots becoming bank owned 191Page A MontiUcello WSB Wright County Minnesota Year Number of Foreclosures Foreclosure Rate Number of Foreclosures Foreclosure Rate 2013 372 0.89% 11,834 0.64% 2014 240 0.57% 8,313 0.46% 2015 205 0.49% 7,212 0.40% Sources: Minnesota Homeownership Center, HousingLink Single -Family Listings Based on a review of various Realtor websites, there were 77 single-family homes actively listed for sale in Monticello in November 2016. The homes were unevenly distributed by price range; weighted heavier toward higher priced homes. Only two (2) homes were priced below $120,000 and 68 priced $150,000 or higher listed for sale. Four (4) homes were listed for sale between $100,000 and $150,000. The average list price of homes on the market was $271,759 in November 2016. While homes typically sell for less than the list prices, the current prices suggest that Monticello should continue to see appreciation in home prices since the low point in 2011. Existing Lot Supply There are currently a limited number of lots available to accommodate new single-family homes in Monticello. The City is experiencing a shortage in buildable lots as bank owned lots have been purchased and developed. As of the end of 2016, there are a total of 74 single-family lots and sites that can accommodate up to 101 multi -family units. Permit numbers have steadily recovered from the 2010 and 2011 low point (two single family permits issued each year) to the issuance of 61 single-family permits in 2016. Prior to the recession, the City issued more than 300 permits annually. During that time (2002- 2007) housing lots were selling in the $70,000490,000 range. The sale price of lots fell by more than 80% after the recession. Bank foreclosures of developers resulted in existing lots becoming bank owned 191Page A MontiUcello WSB and ultimately being developed quickly. Many of the approved single family pre -plats were not completed due to the diminished demand for new homes. Refer to Table 1-U for full details. TABLE 1-U: AVAILABLE PLATTED & UTILITY SERVICED LOTS Development Featherstone Hunters Crossing Hillside Farm Spirit Hills Sunset Ponds Carlisle Village Autumn Ridge Eastview Club West Pine View Total Source: City of Monticello Single Family Lots Multi Family Lots 15 0 22 0 0 5 21 0 7 17 0 79 1 0 7 0 1 0 74 101 In mid -2016, the average price of a lot was about $20,000. As the housing market has improved and lot prices have increased due to the limited supply, it has allowed for an increase in prices for new single family lots. The new housing price situation is further aggravated by the limited number of remaining small home builders which have either closed or changed professions due to the recession and is now resulting in higher construction costs. According to a Monticello realty expert, another critical factor impacting the demand for single family homes is the degree to which first-time home buyers are riddled with college debt and unable to afford the price of a new home. The interest rate for new home loans has increased slightly from an all-time low of 3.4% during the depths of the recession to approximately 4.25% in late 2016. Monticello's average re -sale price currently sits in the five to seven percent range and is expected to go up. There are no major complaints or concerns among current homeowners looking to move up into more expensive homes. However, Monticello currently lacks availability of lots that are attractive for higher end housing. The community should focus on the development or attraction of a high-end housing development. The two -major upper -bracket areas (Carlisle Village and Briar Oakes Boulevard) have limited availability of undeveloped lots and are surrounded by agricultural uses. City -annexed land west of Monticello provides development opportunities but is unattractive to developers looking to build higher -market homes due to the lack of natural amenities and features generally associated with high end housing areas. Single-family Housing Permits The City of Monticello issued sixty-one (61) building permits in 2016. This number is up 38.6% from 2015 when forty-four (44) permits were issued (6 attached and 38 detached). To meet demand, the City will need to continue this trend. Please refer to Table I -C for additional information. MontiUcello 201Page WSS RENTAL HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS Affordable Rental Housing This section of the report analyses the affordable rental housing market in Monticello. The analysis includes data collected from Affordable Housing Online. All the properties in this section are general occupancy. As shown in the demographic and housing stock overview sections, there are approximately 1,175 renter households in Monticello which is down 127 households from 2010. The overwhelming majority of renters live in larger multifamily properties. There are approximately 2,923 renters (24% of total population) living in Monticello. As of 2014, 25% of total Monticello households were renter -occupied, compared to 15.6% for Wright County, and 28% for the State of Minnesota. Properties that include units assisted by federal programs were surveyed as part of this analysis. In total, eight (8) properties with 322 units were surveyed. Twenty-six (26) percent of the City's rental units are federally subsidized. Monticello's federally assisted affordable rental housing stock includes properties financed through the following programs: TABLE 1-V: FEDERALLY ASSISTED AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING STOCK Program I Properties Units Section 8 I 2 74 LIHTC I 3 102 RD 515 I 6 189 Total 9 307 Note: The total does not necessarily equal the sum of each program as some properties may participate in multiple funding programs Source: Affordable Housing Online The average number of units per property for affordable rentals in Monticello is 34. The largest federally assisted affordable rental community in Monticello is Ridgemont Apartments at 48 units and the smallest is Hillside Terrace II at 12 units. Two apartment properties provide housing for seniors totaling 59 units. All 307 units include some form of rental assistance (like Section 8) to make rent more affordable for very low income families. In Monticello, a family of four must earn $42,900 or less to qualify for Section 8 housing. See Table I- W.- Federally Assisted Units by Property for details. TABLE I -W: FEDERALLY ASSISTED UNITS BY PROPERTY Name Sec 8 LIHTC RD 515 Senior Broadway Square - - 28 Cedar Crest Apartments 38 - Hillside Terrace -- Monticello I 36 - Hillside Terrace II - 12 Ridgeway Apartments - 44 - River Park View Apartments 31 31 31 Ridgemont Apartments - 48 - Source: Affordable Housing Online Note: Not all unit counts are available from HUD MontiUcello 21 JPage WSB Photographs of Monticello Apartment Buildings Image 2: River Park View Apartments Image 1: Ridgemont Apartments 0644w—, Image 3: Hillside Terrace Image 6: Ridgeway Apartments MontiUcello Image 4: Cedar Crest Apartments Image 5: Broadway Square 221Page A WSS Image 8: 7th Street Townhomes Image 7: Monticello Crossings a - - There are currently three future housing development sites that have been identified in Monticello. Site A is an 11.93 -acre area located at 506 Territorial Road and is the site of the historic registered Rand House which was the home of the Minnegasco founders. This site is zoned low density residential (R-1) and performance-based overlay and may be used for the development of a senior housing apartment complex with sixty to eighty units (60-80) in addition to forty (40) patio homes. The Rand House would be used as a community center and guest home for the development. Rezoning this area using the planned unit development (PUD) process may be the best option to allow for this higher density development. The uniqueness of the property and the City's need for additional senior housing units could be used to justify the PUD. Also, we believe the proposed housing development is consistent with the purpose of the performance based enhancement district. Site B is a 6.4 -acre area located north of the lake on the corner of Elm Street and 7t' Street West. It is zoned for medium density residential (R-3) and may be used for multifamily, senior, or market -rate development. It is within proximity to the Cub Food Store and the Community Center. The site's southern exposure to the wetland pond offers an attractive natural amenity. Finally, Site C is located at the corner of Locust Street and 31 Street West and has already been approved for the construction of a twenty-three (23) unit three story residential development. As stated earlier in the "Senior Housing Market" section, from 2010-2021 Monticello will need to construct 136 new senior housing units to meet the forecasted demand. Sites A and B have both been identified as ideal locations for senior housing development. Depending on the number of units permitted on each of these sites, and on how many senior housing units have been constructed from 2010-2016, Monticello may need to identify more sites suitable for senior housing. i a Monticello 231Page A WSB Image 9: Site A � Monticello Image 10: Site B Image 11: Site C 241Page A WSB DEMAND ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS This section of the report utilizes data collected in the previous sections to calculate demand for owned and rental housing in Monticello through 2021. Housing Demand Analysis Demand for additional housing in Monticello will primarily come from household growth. Replacement of older homes will contribute to the need for additional residential development, as will pent-up demand. Table 1 X outlines our calculations for owner and rental housing demand in Monticello from 2017 to 2021. TABLE 1-X: POTENTIAL HOUSING DEMAND OVER NEXT 5 YEARS 2017 to 2021 A. Household growth* I 500 B. Replacement Demand I 10 C. Total housing growth (A+B) I 510 Range to occur over next 5 years: D. Percent rental demand 30% to 35% E. Rental housing demand (C x D) 153 to 179 F. Pent-up rental demand 64 64 G. Total rental housing demand (E+F) 217 to 243 H. Percent owner demand 1 65% to 70% I. Total owner housing demand (C x H) 1332 to 357 * Includes projected growth for Monticello (263 households) and one-fifth the growth in the remainder of the market area (237) Sources: US Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts, WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 1-E shows that Monticello is projected to add 263 households between 2016 and 2021 and the remainder of the market area is projected to add 1,183 households. We estimate that Monticello can capture one-fifth of the demand in the remainder of the market area, or 237 households, by providing greater housing choices to retain and attract some potential residents who otherwise would live in the surrounding areas. Thus, an additional 500 housing units would need to be developed from 2017 to 2021 to satisfy projected household growth in Monticello. Replacement demand is generated from the loss of housing or the need to replace housing units that are physically or functionally obsolete. A review of Monticello's housing stock from the U.S. Census revealed that there are about 340 housing units built prior to 1950. It can be assumed that these homes' values are decreasing at a faster rate relative to other types of housing. Most of these homes are in good condition', and we estimate that 0.5% percent per year should be removed annually from the housing supply because of obsolescence, which equates to two units every year or ten units over the next five years. A healthy rental market is expected to have a vacancy rate of about 5% to allow for sufficient consumer choice and unit turnover. With pent-up demand (a shortage of units), persons who would normally form 4 Good condition meaning that these homes do not need renovated or demolished. 251Page A Monticello WSB their own rental households, instead decide to move in with other persons in a housing unit, live with their parents, or live in housing outside of the area and commute to jobs. In 2016, Monticello had an estimated 1,300 rental households, of which 20 units (1.5% from Table 2-1) were vacant. This percentage is well below the stabilized vacancy rate. In order to bring the overall vacancy rate to a balanced 5%, about 64 additional rental units would need to be added to the city. Based on demographic and market trends, we project 30% to 35% of the housing demand from household growth and replacement -need in Monticello between 2017 and 2021 will be for rental housing. There is a total of demand for approximately 217 to 243 rental households (about 44 to 49 annually). This demand is for all types of rental housing — from subsidized and market rate general occupancy housing to senior housing. An estimate of 65% to 70% of housing demand in Monticello between 2017 and 2021 is projected to be for owner -occupied housing. This equates to demand for 332 to 357 households from 2017 to 2021 (66 to 71 homes annually.). This would equate to the projected demand for single-family homes and townhomes. These demand projections are based upon the housing market's behavior over that last ten years. During this time, we experienced the market correction of 2009-2013 which greatly impacted the calculations causing the projections to be historically low. It can be anticipated that if the housing market continues its recovery, the demand for both rental -occupied and owner -occupied households will be greater than the projections. It can be further extrapolated that in response to the increased regulations on mortgages, and the high rates of student debt, the demand for rental housing will dramatically increase. Other Housing Recommendations Projected demand for new housing products in Monticello through the remainder of the decade from current and future residents is outlined on the preceding pages. In addition, there are other programs that Monticello can implement to assist in meeting local housing needs and improving the quality of the existing stock. The key programs/initiatives that Monticello should pursue are outlined below. • Monticello needs to closely monitor rental vacancy rates and availability as new rental properties are added to the community. The addition of the 202 -unit Monticello Crossing apartment complex has set a precedent with 200 of its units being occupied during a very short timeframe. This indicates a clear pent-up demand that should continue to increase at the housing market recovers from the correction. • Monticello should also work towards converting vacant housing units into renter -occupied to reach 30-35% of total housing units. In its current state, the rental housing inventory sits at 25% of total housing units. As seen in Table 1-1, the City is projected to have seventy-six (76) additional vacancies. • Monticello needs to maintain its low housing costs and low percentage (19%) of residents paying more than 30% of their monthly household income on housing to reduce the negative impacts from another housing correction like 2006-08. This percentage is much lower than county and state averages (27% and 29% respectively). • Monticello should make efforts to increase affordable rental housing inventory so they are available for younger generations of citizens as well as baby -boomers and empty -nesters. The latter two cohorts of residents are downsizing their living spaces and need affordable places to 261Page A Monticello WSS live. Combining affordable housing options with job opportunities could lead to an increase in 19 -24 -year-old residents. • Monticello should also ensure an adequate amount of higher -end rental units for higher -income individuals looking to retire and downsize their living quarters. While these individuals are looking for smaller spaces, they are not willing to surrender the amenities to which they have grown accustom. • With the expected increase in the percentage of residents over the age of sixty-five (65), Monticello needs to increase their stock of senior housing units. Refer to Table 1-0 for projected figures. • Monticello should consider the development of housing in the downtown area to accommodate young seniors and millennial residents. Both cohorts share the same preference for areas that are rich with amenities and walkable, and housing properties that have lower maintenance requirements. Providing residents with downtown housing options is critical if the city wishes to achieve population age diversity and a complete life -cycle housing environment. t'ly. rvj;: of x P v IT Figure 3-2: Land Use Plan Map 3-4 1 Land Use City of Monticello w a o a c m F j ' 3-4 1 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-3: Land Use Plan - Places to Live •+ � Sil t • Firs! Lake r�� � ) Lake �"5 Lake ■ ' r I i T 4 925 05 1 'T° NIIBs � Cw 5a�p¢; �t]}A, 53obvvc C[ww'. R1�[ Ccrn(•�mdR56 s.i�vrnla }�.-b i.?008 � I The remainder of this section describes the categories used in the Comprehensive Plan in greater detail. Places to Live The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create and sustain quality places for people to live in Monticello (see Figure 3-3). This category designates areas where housing is the primary use of land. The emphasis behind Places to Live is to help ensure that Monticello offers a full range of housing choices, while preserving and enhancing the quality of neighborhoods. Although a single land use category, Places to Live does not suggest housing is a homogenous commodity or that any type of housing is desirable or allowed in any location. When someone says "house" the most common image is a single family detached dwelling. This housing style is characterized by several features. There is a one-to- one relationship between house and parcel of land - the housing unit is located on a single parcel. The house is not physically attached to another housing unit. The housing is designed for occupancy by a single family unit. The typical neighborhood in Monticello is made up exclusively of single family detached homes. The primary variables become the design of the sub- division, the size of the lot and the size and style of the dwelling. Many older neighborhoods in Monticello (north of Interstate 94) were built on a traditional grid street system. Over the past thirty years, development patterns have moved to a new suburban curvilinear 2008 Comprehensive Plan Land Use 1 3-5 pattern, characterized by curvilinear street layout with the use of cul-de-sacs. A variety of factors, including consumer preference and housing cost, have increased the construction of attached housing in recent years. Duplexes, twin homes quads and townhomes are common examples of this housing style. Although the specific form changes, there are several common characteristics. Each hous- ing unit is designed for occupancy by a single family. The housing units are physically attached to each other in a horizontal orientation. Places to Live will include some neighborhoods de- signed to offer a mixture of housing types and densities. Mixed residential neighborhoods create a pattern of that combines single-family detached housing with a mixture of attached housing types. Using good design and planning, these mixed residential neighborhoods can achieve a higher density without compromising the overall integrity of the low-density residential pat- tern. This integration strengthens neighborhoods by increas- ing housing choice and affordability beyond what is possible by today's rules and regulations. It also avoids large and separate concentrations of attached housing. It enhances opportunities to organize development in a manner that preserves natural features. A complete housing stock includes higher density residential areas that consist of multi -family housing types such as apartments and condominiums. In the near term, the Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate expanding the existing supply of higher density hous- ing. It is likely that Monticello will need additional higher density housing to: ► Provide housing suited to the needs of an aging population. ► Facilitate redevelopment in the Downtown or in other appropriate locations of the community. ► Provide housing needed to attract the work force required to achieve economic development goals of the City. Higher density residential land uses should be located where the setting can accommodate the taller buildings and additional traffic. Policies - Places to Live The Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the following objectives for residential land use in Monticello: 1. Provide a range of housing choices that fit all stages of a person's life -cycle (see below). 2. Support development in areas that best matches the overall objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Develop quality neighborhoods that create a sense of connection to the community and inspire sus- tained investment. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain the quality and integrity of existing neighborhoods by encouraging the maintenance of property and reinvestment into the existing housing stock. Changes in housing type should be allowed only to facilitate necessary redevelopment. 4. Create neighborhoods that allow residents to maintain a connection to the natural environment and open spaces. 5. Seek quality over quantity in residential growth. Achieving the objectives for quality housing and neighborhoods may reduce the overall rate of growth. 6. Reserve areas with high amenities for "move up" housing as desired in the vision statement. These amenities may include forested areas, wetland complexes, adjacency to parks and greenways. Some of the City's policy objectives require further explanation. Life Cycle Housing Housing is not a simple "one size fits all" commodity. Monticello's housing stock varies by type, age, style and price. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the characteristics of the housing stock based on the 2000 Census and recent building permit trends. The concept of life cycle housing recognizes that hous- ing needs change over the course of a person's life (see Figure 3-4). Young adults may not have the income capacity to own the typical single family home. This 3-6 1 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-4: Life Cycle of Housing Supply segment of the population often seeks rental housing. Families move through different sizes, styles and prices of housing as family size and income changes over time. With aging, people may desire smaller homes with less maintenance. Eventually, the elderly transition to hous- ing associated with options for direct care. As noted in the Vision Statement, Monticello's population will continue to become more diverse. This diversity will be seen in age, race, culture and wealth. These factors will influence the housing needs of Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes these differences and seeks to create a balanced housing supply that encourages people to move to and stay in Monticello. This balance may not be achieved solely by market forces guided by this Land Use Plan. Actions by the City may be needed to promote the creation of housing in underserved segments of the market. Neighborhood Design A priority for the community is diversification of the housing stock by providing more "move up" housing. In this context, the term "move up" housing refers to larger homes with more amenities in structure and setting. This type of housing may not be exclusively single-family detached or low density. Attached forms of housing with medium or high densities may meet the objectives for move up housing in the appropriate loca- tions. In this way, the objectives for move up housing and life cycle housing are compatible and supportive. While every community wants a high quality housing stock, this issue has particular importance in Mon- ticello. It is a key to retaining population. Without a broader variety of housing options, families may encouraged to leave Monticello to meet their need for a larger home. It is a factor in economic development. One facet of attracting and retaining professional jobs is to provide desirable housing alternatives. It must be recognized that creating move up housing requires more than policies in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for achiev- ing the desired results. The desired outcomes require private investment. This investment occurs when demand exists or the City can provide an incentive to attract investment. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Land Use 1 3-7 City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 4B. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-54 expressing support for the proposed use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in the amount of $500,000 for a 53 -unit Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment development by Duffy Development Company, Inc. (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff is asking the City Council to consider adopting Resolution 2020-54 expressing support of the potential use of TIF assistance to help fill a $500,000 funding gap in Duffy Development's affordable housing proposal. Duffy Development, Minnetonka, MN, recently submitted an affordable housing TIF pre - application seeking assistance to support development of a 53 -unit apartment that would utilize the Federal Section 42, Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program as the major source of funding for the proposal. Often this type of housing is referred to as workforce or affordable housing and is aimed at serving a lower income demographic segment. For the tax credit funding, the household income is based on the 11 -County Twin Cities metro area at 60 percent of median household income as an eligibility -criteria; rather than just Wright County income data. A family of four could earn approximately $60,000 and qualify for the proposed housing. Though this is a preliminary proposal review, the City Council is required to act to establish a new TIF District. The proposed development site is at the far west end of the Riverwood Bank parcel on 7th Street West. Duffy Development has entered into a purchase agreement with Riverwood Bank for an initial purchase of 2.66 acres and an option to acquire an additional 1.51 acres abutting 1-94 for future commercial or residential development in a later phase. Both purchase parcels also border Elm Street. TIF District administration, including those in support of affordable housing, was assigned to the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) by the City Council several years ago. While the City Council approved a new 25 -year affordable housing TIF District in the summer of 2018 for the Briggs apartment development, prior to that, it had been approximately 16 years since the last affordable housing TIF District had been created. There are currently five (5) housing TIF Districts in the City. Of those, three (3) are approaching their decertification dates. The EDA is also able to retain excess increment from the four older districts with the potential to provide assistance to future affordable housing developments that may or may not involve the creation of a new TIF Districts. The City's 2017 Housing Study found that there was a demand for 230 new multi -family units during the timeframe 2017-2021. It also found that 24 percent of the households in City fall in a low to moderate income category (these are households that would qualify to live in affordable housing units). The 24 percent figure was then extrapolated to the new total unit demand resulting in a need for approximately 55 units of affordable housing during the timeframe from 2017-2021. The recently completed Briggs apartment project, which received TIF support, was required to create 10 affordable units. This would indicate that there may yet be an unmet need for about 45 affordable units in the community. On June 10th and June 24th, the Economic Development Authority met to review the proposal in terms of the potential use of TIF. At the June 10 meeting, Jeff Von Feldt, Duffy City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 Development, presented the concept development proposal to the EDA as a preview. The review included an overview of Duffy Development's previously completed affordable housing development projects in the Twin Cities metro area as well as the target market, the proposed funding mix, and the timeline of the application submittal and review by Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). Mr. Von Feldt stated that the identified funding gap was $500,000, or approximately 3.7 percent of the total $13,500,000 investment. At the June 24th, 2020 regular meeting, the EDA again considered Duffy Development's request for TIF assistance reviewing the proposal information along with data from a recently completed market study paid for by Duffy Development. Mr. Von Feldt also noted the highly competitive nature of the LIHTC process and the point scoring system. He indicated that a resolution of support by the EDA would demonstrate evidence of local commitment and be viewed favorably by MHFA in its consideration of Duffy Development's tax credit funding application. To score sufficient points, Duffy Development is proposing to develop a building that would rent 100 % of the units to households with qualifying income levels; with rents set based on 50 percent of area median income (using I I -County metro data). Also, up to seven (7) of the units would be reserved for households transitioning from homelessness to permanent housing. Duffy Development has engaged a social services agency to provide counseling and other assistive services for homeless clients in their other properties and intends to use that service model in this proposal. A TIF run created by Northland Securities was also reviewed indicating sufficient increment capture over an approximately 16 to 17 -year timeframe. Ultimately, citing the EDA's goals for affordable workforce housing, the EDA adopted Resolution 2020-07 expressing preliminary support for the establishment of an Affordable Housing TIF District. The EDA vote approving the resolution was 6-1 with Commissioner Lloyd Hilgart voting in dissent. A TIF run, completed by Northland Securities, is attached for review. It projects that using an estimated taxable market value of $5.5 million dollars, the development would generate tax increment in excess of the amount requested by Duffy Development. Northland's projections show that $500,000 in net present value (npv) increment could be achieved in about 16 to 17 years. Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is a limited staff impact in considering the TIF application from Duffy Development. The review and organization of the application materials that occurs during the creation of the staff report is part of in-house staff duties. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: This is a pre -application concept review by the City Council. There is a very modest budget impact (normal duty staff time) due to the consideration of the TIF pre -application for City Council direction regarding next steps. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2020-54 expressing support for potential use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) assistance to fill a funding gap in the amount of $500,000 for a proposed 53 -unit Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment development by Duffy Development Company. 2. Motion to deny. 2 City Council Agenda: 7/13/2020 3. Motion to table. 4. Motion of other as determined by the City Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff will defer to the City Council in the consideration of Resolution 2020-54 expressing support for the use of TIF assistance for the Duffy Development affordable housing proposal. While technically this consideration by the City Council is an initial pre -application step and concept review, it is still a critical decision point for Duffy as it needs to show community support in order to submit a competitive application to MHFA. The MHFA tax credit funding application submittal deadline is July 16, 2020. If Duffy Development misses on this deadline, they will have to wait a full year until the next tax credit funding cycle. If Duffy Development is successful in obtaining the LIHTC funding, then they will continue on with the next TIF consideration steps with the EDA and City Council as outlined in the EDA's TIF Guidelines in the spring of 2021. Construction on any approved project would likely not occur until early August 2021 and take at least 12 months. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2020-54 B. TIF Spreadsheet C. Duffy Development TIF pre -application submittal D. Proposed Sources and Uses E. EDA TIF Guidelines F. 2017 Housing Study G. EDA Resolution #2020-7 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2020-54 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED USE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT BY DUFFY DEVELOPMENT COMPAN�, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") and City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") have received a request to assist an entity to be formed by Duffy Development Company, In . 1W "Developer") with certain costs of construction of an approximately 53 -unit afford ultifamily rental housing development in the City (the "Project"); and , WHEREAS, in 2017, the City engaged WSB to conduct a comprehensive housing market study, which was completed in July of 2017 and provides recommendations on the amount and type of housing that could be built ince City to satisfy demand from current and future residents through 2021, and which showed a demand for affordable rental housing in the City; and WHEREAS, a stated goal of the thoty's 2020 Economic Development Work Plan is to act as a paeitthe ting affor e housing develop for the community; and A WHEREAS,ces the Developer's applic*n for low-income housing tax credits in connectioProject is predicated on local support of the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Developer ha estedat the City and Authority indicate their support of the use of tax increment for the WHEREAS, City uth staff have reviewed the proposal and recommend that the Board of Commissione port use of tax increment for the Project in an amount estimated at approximately $5 00; an WHEREAS, uthoi'Rradopted a resolution on June 24, 2020, expressing its support for the use of tax incre r the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello that: 1. The City Council supports the Project and the use of tax increment financing for the Project in the estimated amount of $500,000; provided, however, that authorization of tax increment financing for the Project is solely within the discretion of the City and of the Authority following all legally required proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statues 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended, including (i) a public hearing and approval by the City Council of the City; (ii) a determination, based on an analysis performed by the City's municipal advisor, that tax increment financing assistance is necessary for the Project; (iii) verification of development financing need, based on an analysis performed by the City's municipal advisor, that substantiates that "but for" the use of tax increment financing, the Project would be unable to proceed; and (iv) the negotiation of a development agreement including (among other things) the conditions under which the City or the Authority will provide financial assistance. 2. The City Council supports the Developer's application to MHFA for tax credits for the Project. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello this day of July, 2020. ATTEST: City Clerk 2 Mayor Preliminary for Discussion Purposes Only City of Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 (Housing) Duffy Housing Project Projected Tax Increment Cash Flow TIF District Year Taxes Payable Year Taxable Market Value (TMV) 6 Tax Capacity Less Base Tax Capacity 4 Captured Tax Capacity 3 Original Tax Rate 2 Captured Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Less State Fee Available Tax Increment Financing TIF for City Admin Costs Net Available TIF Present Value of Net Available TIF s 1 2023 5,500,000 53,500 (2,363) 51,137 96.44% 49,317 (178) 49,139 4,914 44,226 41,130 2 2024 5,555,000 53,638 (2,363) 51,274 96.44% 49,450 (178) 49,272 4,927 44,345 80,770 3 2025 5,610,550 53,776 (2,363) 51,413 96.44% 49,584 (179) 49,405 4,941 44,465 118,973 4 2026 5,666,656 53,917 (2,363) 51,554 96.44% 49,719 (179) 49,540 4,954 44,586 155,793 5 2027 5,723,322 54,058 (2,363) 51,695 96.44% 49,855 (179) 49,676 4,968 44,708 191,281 6 2028 5,780,555 54,201 (2,363) 51,838 96.44% 49,993 (180) 49,813 4,981 44,832 225,484 7 2029 5,838,361 54,346 (2,363) 51,983 96.44% 50,133 (180) 49,953 4,995 44,957 258,452 8 2030 5,896,744 54,492 (2,363) 52,129 96.44% 50,274 (181) 50,093 5,009 45,084 290,228 9 2031 5,955,712 54,639 (2,363) 52,276 96.44% 50,416 (181) 50,235 5,023 45,211 320,857 10 2032 6,015,269 54,788 (2,363) 52,425 96.44% 50,559 (182) 50,377 5,038 45,339 350,380 11 2033 6,075,422 54,939 (2,363) 52,576 96.44% 50,704 (183) 50,521 5,052 45,469 378,837 12 2034 6,136,176 55,090 (2,363) 52,727 96.44% 50,851 (183) 50,668 5,067 45,601 406,270 13 2035 6,197,538 55,244 (2,363) 52,881 96.44% 50,999 (184) 50,815 5,082 45,734 432,713 14 2036 6,259,513 55,399 (2,363) 53,036 96.44% 51,148 (184) 50,964 5,096 45,867 458,204 15 2037 6,322,108 55,555 (2,363) 53,192 96.44% 51,299 (185) 51,114 5,111 46,003 482,778 16 2038 6,385,329 55,713 (2,363) 53,350 96.44% 51,452 (185) 51,267 5,127 46,140 506,468 17 2039 6,449,183 55,873 (2,363) 53,510 96.44% 51,606 (186) 51,420 5,142 46,278 529,306 18 2040 6,513,674 56,034 (2,363) 53,671 96.44% 51,761 (186) 51,575 5,157 46,417 551,323 19 2041 6,578,811 56,197 (2,363) 53,834 96.44% 51,918 (187) 51,731 5,173 46,558 572,549 20 2042 6,644,599 56,361 (2,363) 53,998 96.44% 52,077 (187) 51,890 5,189 46,701 593,014 21 2043 6,711,045 56,528 (2,363) 54,165 96.44% 52,237 (188) 52,049 5,205 46,844 612,744 22 2044 6,778,156 56,695 (2,363) 54,332 96.44% 52,399 (189) 52,210 5,221 46,989 631,767 23 2045 6,845,937 56,865 (2,363) 54,502 96.44% 52,562 (189) 52,373 5,237 47,135 650,108 24 2046 6,914,397 57,036 (2,363) 54,673 96.44% 52,727 (190) 52,537 5,254 47,283 667,793 25 2047 6,983,541 57,209 (2,363) 54,846 96.44% 52,894 (190) 52,704 5,270 47,433 684,844 26 2048 7,053,376 57,383 (2,363) 55,020 96.44% 53,062 (191) 52,871 5,287 47,584 701,285 1,328,996 (4,784) 1,324,212 132,421 1,191,790 TOTAL = Key Assumptions for Cash Flow: 1 Taxable market value (TMV) annual growth assumption = 1.00% 2 Original Tax Capacity Rate estimated based on Taxes Payable Year 2020. 3 Election for captured tax capacity is 100.00% 4 Base Tax Capacity is calculated based on a TMV = $315,070. This is based on 3.5 acres of PID 155226000020. 5 Present value is calculated based on semi-annual payments, 4.00% rate, and date of 1/1/2022. 6 TMV is calculated based on 53 housing units at an estimated average value of $103,774 per unit. 7 Tax Capacity is calculated based on 4d classification. NORTHLAND PUBLIC FINANCE Monticello TIF 1-42 PRELIMINARY 6/22/2020 CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUSINESS SUBSIDY APPLICATION BUSINESS ASSISTANCE .FINANCING Legal name of applicant: Address: Telephone nuinber: Name of contact person: REQUESTED INFORMATION -7D � Addendum shall be attached hereto addressing in detail the following: 1. A map showing the exact boundaries of proposed development, 2. Give a general description of the project including size and location of building(s); business type or use; traffic information including parking, projected vehicle counts and traffic flow; timing of the project; estimated market value following completion. 3. The existing Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use designation and zoning of the property. Include a statement as to how the proposed development will conform to the land use designation and how the property will be zoned. 4. A statement identifying, how the increment assistance will be used and why it is necessary to undertake the project. 5. A statement identifying the public benefits of the proposal including, estimated increase in property valuation, new jobs to be created, hourly wages and other community assets. G. A written description of the developer's business, principals, history and past projects I understand that the application fee will be used for EDA staff and consultant costs and may be partially refundable if the request for assistance is withdrawn. Refunds will be made at the discretion of the EDA Board and be based on the costs incurred by the FDA prior to withdraw of the request for assistance. If the initial application fee is insufficient, I will be responsible for additional deposits. SIGNATURE Applicant's Date: CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Application for Business Assistance Financing GENERAL INFORMATION: Business Name: t)Q "y( 'ba i J o y -y,, V C.p. ��. Date: 61 -ZOZ Q Address: V ?,-1 DP-,) 0 dui 1A kJ 4CC, M k voh Ju V" Type (Partnership, etc.): 60 V- Q o N--15- 'o V-11, Authorized Representative: J e.k:�- Y 6v� Phone: C6 Z- Cj14'A e 6-1(1 Description ofBusiness: c0-0 �pg_t-26 N`ur �. Legal Counsel: e -�) t h\LCA ;� 14d \�-- R Address: 1L vD VJ 0\ e � Phone: (01 Z- O,Q�S �KO SSV® FINANCIAL BACKGROUND: 1. Have you ever filed for bankruptcy? 2. Have you ever defaulted on any loan commitment? �J ID 3. Have you applied for conventional financing for the project? . \; C-" e, g� 0 V1 "P- Gj 49 4. List financial references: a. Y)0„) al Ck e w u-4 0r n ak' y' . b. V 0c,-yY�' cY '16 +� C. 2 5. Have you ever used Business Assistance Financing before? f 1 as If yes, what, where and when? W e use, ti ro Cotn�g -,y& vv, A" -Q Q C-0 uv'V; cC &Yv� ' PROJECT INFORMATION: 1. Location of Proposed Project: -1 1; tA- U ac ' A C�A S t 2. Amount of Business Assistance requested? 1, 15(30 6 ®CO 3. Need for Business Assistance: Q \DoJ 4. Present ownership of site: �'l 5. Number of permanent jobs created as a result of project? 6. Estimated annual sales: Present: Future: 16 U) d l>0 C 7. Market value of project following completion:�V��� 8. Anticipated start date: S'U 1me"r d b -')' Q FINANCIAL INFORMATION: 1. Estimated project related costs: a. Land acquisition b. Site development c. Building cost d. Equipment e. Architectural/engineering fee f. Legal fees g. Off-site development costs Completion Date: 3 ;. • 2. Source of financing: a. Private financing institution b. Tax increment funds c. Other public funds d. Developer equity PLEASE INCLUDE: 11 Preliminary financial commitment from bank. 2. Plans and drawing of project. 3. Background material of company. 4. Pro Fon-na analysis. S. Financial statements. C. Statement of property ownership or control. 7. Payment of application fee of $ 10,000. Development Expenses Monticello Workforce Apartments EDA Financial Discussion Sources and Uses of Funds Amount Land $ 406,000 Hard Construction Costs $ 9,734,000 Professional Fees $ 1,519,600 City Development Fees $ 464,000 Other Soft Costs $ 471,000 Financing Costs $ 631,082 Capitolized Reserves $ 275,000 Total Construction Sources Development Sources $ 13,500,682 Amortizing First Mortgage (GMHF) $ 1,826,000 Limited Partnership Equity (Tax Credits) $ 11,178,882 City TIF/Fee Waivers $ 495,800 Total Permanent Sources $ 13,500,682 EDA - TIF Criteria Monticello CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 1. PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA 1:01 Tax increment financing proposals must meet a public purpose in addition to increasing tax base; which can include but are not limited to, the creation of livable wage jobs, removal of blight, and environmental clean up. 1:02 The EDA will utilize Tax Increment financing (TIF) to support the community's long-term economic, redevelopment, and housing goals stipulated in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. TIF proposals will be considered under the Comprehensive Plan and City Code in effect at the time the TIF proposal is received. 1:03 The EDA shall use the following guidelines when evaluating a TIF request. A. All TIF requests shall meet the "but for" test. The "but for" test means that the project would not develop solely on private investment in the reasonable future. The developer shall provide findings for the "but for" test. B. TIF will not be provided to projects that have the financial feasibility to proceed without the benefit of the subsidy. In effect, TIF will not be provided solely to broaden a developer's profit margins on a project. C. TIF requests should create the highest feasible number of jobs on site from date of occupancy where deemed appropriate. D. For manufacturing and warehousing TIF requests, at least 90% of the jobs created must pay at least 160% of the federal minimum wage requirements for individuals over the age of 20 during the term of the assistance. In the case of a recipient with existing jobs, the EDA may determine that the wage goal is satisfied if wages are increased to at least the minimum specified in this paragraph. Annual written reports are required until termination date. Failure to meet the job and wage level goals require partial or full repayment of the assistance with interest. E. In the case of a recipient with existing jobs, the EDA may determine that the wage goal is satisfied if wages are increased by a specified amount over the federal minimum wage. Annual written reports are required until termination date. Failure to 1 EDA - TIF Criteria meet the job and wage level goals require partial or full repayment of the assistance with interest. F. TIF requests should result in a substantial increase in property value and/or property taxes. F. TIF requests should facilitate redevelopment or elimination of "substandard" or "blighted" areas where deemed appropriate. G. TIF requests should facilitate the "clean-up" of environmentally unsound property where deemed appropriate. H. TIF requests should increase housing options for area residents where deemed appropriate. 2. TIF APPROVAL CRITERIA 2:01 All new projects considered by the EDA should meet the following minimum approval criteria. However, it should not be presumed that a project meeting these criteria will automatically be approved. Meeting these criteria creates no contractual right on the part of any potential developer or the EDA. 2:02 Prior to approval by the EDA, the developer shall provide any and all applicable and required market and financial documentation, appraisals, soil boring, information provided to private lenders for the project, and other information or data as requested. 2:03 A recipient of TIF must make a commitment to continue operations at the site where the subsidy is used for at least five years after the benefit date. 2:04 The EDA may determine job creation or retention is not a goal of the subsidy. In those cases, the recipient must instead meet at least one of the following minimum requirements (in addition to all other criteria in this document other than those relating to jobs and minimum wages): A. To remove blight and encourage redevelopment in the commercial and industrial areas of the City in order to encourage high levels of property maintenance and private reinvestment in those areas; or B. The proposed subsidy must result in improvements to public infrastructure or public facilities, including without limitations, sewers, storm sewers, streets, parks, recreational facilities, and other City facilities; or C. The proposed subsidy must remove physical impediments to development of land, including without limitations poor soils, bedrock conditions, steep slopes, or similar geotechnical problems. 3. PROCEDURES 2 EDA - TIF Criteria 3:01 Meet with appropriate Staff to discuss the scope of the project, define public assistance requested, identify public participation eligibility, and other information as may be necessary. 3:02 The request shall be reviewed by Staff on a preliminary basis as to the feasibility of the project. 3:03 The project concept shall be placed on the EDA agenda for concept review. The applicant will make a presentation of the project. Staff will present its findings. 3:04 If EDA concept review is positive, Staff will provide the City Council with an informational concept review. 3:05 The City will hold all required public hearings. 3:06 The applicant will execute and submit the Preliminary Development Agreement accompanied by a deposit per approved fee schedule. 3:07 Building and site plans will be required to be submitted to the Community Development Department. 3:08 If Planning and Zoning Commission action is required, it will be necessary for the applicant, at this time, to make application to the Commission. 3:09 Staff will authorize the following steps: A. Preparation for establishment of the Tax Increment Finance District and the Tax Increment Financing Plan if required. B. Preparation of the Purchase and Development Contract or Private Redevelopment Contract (Subsidy Agreement) based upon agreed terms. 3:10 When action is required for the Tax Increment Finance District and Plan, Purchase and Development Contract or Private Redevelopment Contract, or Zoning/Ordinance; the EDA, Planning Commission and City Council shall take appropriate action such as public hearings and consideration of approvals. 3:11 Building permit will be issued after the Tax Increment Finance District and Plan is approved by the City Council, the Purchase and Development Contract or Private Redevelopment Contract is executed by the developer and EDA, and the Building Permit Fees are paid. 3:12 Generally Tax Increment Financing projects take between six to eight weeks from time of authorization to begin drafting plan and contract. History: Public Hearing and Adoption the 8th of September 1999 Public Haring and Adoption of Amendments the 4th day of October 2000 Public Hearing and Adoption of Amendments the 5th of May 2004 Public Hearing and Adoption of Amendments the 3rd day of May 2006 Public Hearing and Adoption the 12th day of November 2008 k EDA - TIF Criteria Public Hearing and Adoption the 23rd day of March 2009. City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 g:' . WSB Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who participated in the development of the Monticello Housing Study, including the Monticello City staff, Wright County Assessor's Office and the various realtors in the community. Completed in coordination with: A BWSB & Associates, Inc. 1 I Page A MontiUcello WSB PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF RESEARCH Housing is an important component of all communities. Housing quality, availability, affordability and diversity enhances the quality of life, supports economic development, and contributes to a community's sense of place. WSB & Associates, Inc. was engaged by the City of Monticello to conduct a Housing Study to assess the housing market conditions and provide recommendations for housing needs within the City of Monticello. The market analysis focused on the housing needs within the City of Monticello including market rate, subsidized, and move - up housing for various age categories including owner -occupied and renter occupied housing options. Monticello's Housing Market Study ("Study") should be used as a reference to guide planning efforts, financial initiatives and strategies, and provide direction to the City regarding the approach it should take; the types of housing opportunities the City should promote, and the roles in providing those opportunities. This Study is intended to be flexible to meet unforeseen housing needs and future land use decisions. It should be noted that the findings presented in this report should not be used to determine the market feasibility of any single development or project; rather, it is designed to be abroad analysis of the entire Monticello housing market and is intended to guide planning efforts, especially as they relate to future land use designations. The Study contains data from both primary and secondary research. Primary research includes interviews with local officials, and the real estate community. Secondary research data includes data from the US Census, American Community Survey, Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), Wright County, Business Analyst', and other local planning agencies. Secondary research is always used as a basis for analysis and is carefully reviewed along with other factors that may impact projections. All the information on pending developments was gathered by WSB & Associates, Inc. and is accurate to the best of our knowledge. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS This section looks at the demographic characteristics that underlie the need for various types of housing in Monticello. The U.S. Census and Business Analyst served as the primary sources for the demographic overview. While population projections are an effective planning tool when used correctly, their accuracy is dependent on several factors including assumptions for birth rates, death rates, migration, and economic conditions. Assumptions are based on past trends and the best information available at the time, but assumptions do not always remain true, and unexpected changes can occur. Therefore, Monticello should use the population projections presented in this Market Study as a general guide and not as an absolute certainty. Moreover, the City should periodically review and update the population projections based upon new conditions. WSB & Associates, Inc. determined the Study Area to be used as comparison points. The area was based on geographic and man-made boundaries, community orientation, our knowledge of the area, and the dictates of the proposal. Considering these factors, we determined a Study Area to include the cities of Monticello, Big Lake, Buffalo, Elk River, Becker, and Rogers. In addition, Wright County and the State ' Business Analyst is a data processing service that uses ESRI technology, U.S. Census data, and American Community Survey data. 2 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB of Minnesota are also included as part of the analysis in the report. Though outside the scope of this report, it is important to note that surrounding communities' populations and available housing stock may affect Monticello's housing market. Figure 1: City of Monticello, MN HISTORIC POPULATION CHANGE The total population of Monticello has grown substantially since the 1980s. Between 1980 and 2010, the City has grown by 597% adding 10,929 new residents, accounting for 18% of the study areas total growth. During the last U.S. Census period (2000-2010), Monticello saw a 38% growth with the addition of 4,891 new residents. Please refer to Table 1-A for further details. 3 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSS Table 1-A: POPULATION CHANGE 1980.2010 Monticello's age distribution has remained relatively consistent from 2000 to 2010 with the largest age group being 25 to 34 in both census periods. The percentage of people 19 and younger decreased from 33.7% to 32.8% while the percentage of those 65 and older increased from 8.9% to 9.8%. Keeping with national trends, the median age increased in Monticello from 2000 to 2010 from 29.8 to 31.6. Please refer to Table 2-A for further details. Table 2-A: MONTICELLO HISTORIC AGE DEMOGRAPHICS 2000-2010 2000 2010 Change Number % Number US Census Total Population 1980-1990 100.0 1990.2000 2000-2010 Under 5 years Place 1980 1990 2000 2010 No. % No. % No. % Monticello 1,830 4,941 7,868 12,759 3,111 170.0% 2,927 59.2% 4,891 62.2% Big Lake 2,210 3,113 6,063 10,060 903 40.9% 2,950 94.8% 3,997 65.9% Buffalo 4,560 6,856 10,097 15,453 2,296 50.4% 3,241 47.3% 5,356 53.0% Elk River I 6,785 11,143 16,447 22,974 4,358 64.2% 5,304 47.6% 6,527 39.7% Becker I 601 902 2,673 4,538 301 50.1% 1,771 196.3% 1,865 69.8% Rogers 652 698 3,588 11,197 46 7.1% 2,890 414.0% 7,609 212.1 A WSB Study Area 16,638 27,653 46,736 76,981 11,015 66.2% 19,083 69.0% 30,245 64.7% Total Wright County 58,681 68,710 89,986 124,700 10,029 17.10% 21,276 30.90% 34,714 38.50 Minnesota 3,806,10 4,075,907 4,375,09 4,919,47 269,804 7.10% 299,19 7.30% 544,38 12.40 3 9 9 2 0 % Source: U.S. Census Bureau Monticello's age distribution has remained relatively consistent from 2000 to 2010 with the largest age group being 25 to 34 in both census periods. The percentage of people 19 and younger decreased from 33.7% to 32.8% while the percentage of those 65 and older increased from 8.9% to 9.8%. Keeping with national trends, the median age increased in Monticello from 2000 to 2010 from 29.8 to 31.6. Please refer to Table 2-A for further details. Table 2-A: MONTICELLO HISTORIC AGE DEMOGRAPHICS 2000-2010 2000 2010 Number % Number % Total Population 7,868 100.0 12759 100.0 Under 5 years 799 10.2 1292 10.1 5 to 9 years 725 9.2 1101 8.6 10 to 14 years 610 7.8 969 7.6 15 to 19 years 511 6.5 823 6.5 20 to 24 years 547 7 731 5.7 25 to 34 years 1,571 20 2255 17.7 35 to 44 years 1,215 15.4 1991 15.6 45 to 54 years 719 9.1 1505 11.8 55 to 59 years 271 3.4 490 7.0 60 to 64 years 202 2.6 395 3.1 65 to 74 years 316 4 584 5.0 75 to 84 years I 260 3.3 394 3.0 85 years and over 122 1.6 229 1.8 Median age (years) 29.8 (X) 31.4 ( X ) Source: U.S. Census Bureau �01[�o 4 1 P a g e A WSB POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS Population projections are an effective planning tool when used correctly. They are based upon assumptions for birth rates, death rates, migration, and economic conditions. In 2010, the U.S. Census reported Monticello's population as 12,759. Monticello's estimated population was 13,568 in 2016, and is projected to increase to 14,383 in 2021. Again, it is impossible to know with certainty what Monticello's future population will be, but it is reasonable to believe that any future population increases resulting from new housing development or redevelopment in Monticello will be offset (to some extent) by population trends resulting from an aging population and diminishing household size. However, based on available data, Monticello's population will likely see a continued increase through year 2021. It is anticipated that Monticello will account for 18.8% of the Study Area's population growth between 2016 and 2021. Monticello's expected rate of population change is roughly equal to the County and double the State. Refer to Table 1-B: Projected Population Change: 2010-2021 for additional information. The City of Monticello has developed its own projections based on building permits and certificates of occupancy over the past two years. The Minnesota State Demographer's 2015 Annual estimate was utilized as base reference point. It indicated the City had 13,311 residents at the end of 2014. During the 2015-2016 time -frame, the City issued permits for 307 additional housing units. Using ESRI's estimated household size of 2.72, this yields an estimated population of 14,146 at the end of 2016. In recognition of the trend of increasing household size and the moderate pace of new residential development and household formation in the City, the projections for the 2017-2021 period indicate an increase of 893 people (2.74 persons per 326 new units or 65 +/- units per year). The annual population increase of 179 is sixteen (16) people higher than ESRI's annual projections based on U.S. Census Bureau data estimates. Again, ESRI's figures appear to have under -accounted for the sizeable number of new units in the community during 2015-2016. Basically, ESRI does not factor in the steady recovery in building permit issuance in this period and applies its projections to a lower beginning population figure than a more realistic number. Refer to Tables 1-C and 2-C for more information. 5 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB TABLE 1-13: PROJECTED POPULATION CHANGE: 2010-2021 Change U.S. Census Bureau 2010-2016 2016-2021 Place 2010 2016 2021 No. % No. % Monticello I 12,759 13,568 14,383 _ 809 6.3% 815 6.0% Big Lake I 10,060 10,629 11,080 569 ' 5.7% 451 4.2% Buffalo I 15,453 16,093 16,699 640 4.1% 606 3.8% Elk River 22,974 23,984 24,891 1,010 4.4% 907 3.8% Becker I 4,538 4,858 5,253 320 7.1% 395 8.1% Rogers 11,197 12,675 13,844 1,478 13.2% 1,169 9.2% Study Area Total 76,981 81,807 86,150 4,826 6.3% 4,343 5.3% 1 Wright County 124,700 132,801 140,895 8,101 6.5% 8,094 6.1% Minnesota 4,919,479 5,541,669 5,720,647 622,190 12.6% 178,978 3.2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The City of Monticello has developed its own projections based on building permits and certificates of occupancy over the past two years. The Minnesota State Demographer's 2015 Annual estimate was utilized as base reference point. It indicated the City had 13,311 residents at the end of 2014. During the 2015-2016 time -frame, the City issued permits for 307 additional housing units. Using ESRI's estimated household size of 2.72, this yields an estimated population of 14,146 at the end of 2016. In recognition of the trend of increasing household size and the moderate pace of new residential development and household formation in the City, the projections for the 2017-2021 period indicate an increase of 893 people (2.74 persons per 326 new units or 65 +/- units per year). The annual population increase of 179 is sixteen (16) people higher than ESRI's annual projections based on U.S. Census Bureau data estimates. Again, ESRI's figures appear to have under -accounted for the sizeable number of new units in the community during 2015-2016. Basically, ESRI does not factor in the steady recovery in building permit issuance in this period and applies its projections to a lower beginning population figure than a more realistic number. Refer to Tables 1-C and 2-C for more information. 5 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB TABLE 1-C: MONTICELLO HOUSING PERMITS & POPULATION FORECAST CALCULATIONS Year: Single -Family Single -Family Multifamily Total 14,146 15,039 Detached Attached 13,568 14,383 163 2010 2 0 0 2 2011 2 0 0 2 2012 22 0 0 22 2013 49 3 0 52 2014 70 3 0 73 2015 38 6 136 180 2016 61 0 66 127 Average Total 244 12 202 458 65.2 per year POPULATION FORECAST CALCULATIONS Time -Frame New Housing Average HH Size New Residents 2014 Pop End of 2016 Pop Units (Permits x HH Size) 2015-2016 1 307 2.72 835 13,311 14,146 ' Time -Frame New Housing Average HH Size New Residents 2016 Pop End of 2021 Pop Units (Permits x HH Size) 2017-2021 326 (65.2 x 5) 2.74 893 14,146 15,039 Source: City of Monticello, Minnesota State Demographer TABLE 2-C: POPULATION PROJECTION DIFFERENCE HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS AND FORECASTS In 2010, the US Census reported 4,693 households in Monticello and 3,164 families. A household refers to a housing unit occupied by at least one person. A household can involve a family living in a housing unit or it can involve unrelated people sharing an apartment or housing unit. A family refers to a household consisting of a householder and one or more other people related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. In the future, it is likely that the percentage of married couples without children living with them will increase. The percentage of single parent households will also increase. Family households with no spouse present accounted for approximately 30% of the family households in Monticello in 2010. The average household size in Monticello in 2000 was 2.64 persons compared to 2.68 in 2010 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. These figures were projected to increase, according to ESRI, to 2.72 in 2016 and 2.74 by 2021. According to the American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, Monticello has seen a decrease in family households, a decrease in households with children under the age of 18, and an increase in non -family households (see Table 1-D: Household Occupancy Characteristics for further details). These trends held true from 2009-2014 aside from an outlying year (2014 - highlighted in gray on Table 1-D) when there was an increase in family households, an increase in families with children, and a decrease in nonfamily households. This may have been caused by an increased availability of single- family housing units. These trends have implications for the demand of future housing types in Monticello. Since the average household size is projected to decrease and the trend of family households has been decreasing, a shift in demand will likely occur less for 3-4 bedroom, single-family homes and more for smaller housing units, and multi -family units. 6 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB 2016 2021 Annual Growth City of Monticello 14,146 15,039 179 ESRI 13,568 14,383 163 Difference 578 656 16 Source: ESRI forecasts, The City of Monticello HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS AND FORECASTS In 2010, the US Census reported 4,693 households in Monticello and 3,164 families. A household refers to a housing unit occupied by at least one person. A household can involve a family living in a housing unit or it can involve unrelated people sharing an apartment or housing unit. A family refers to a household consisting of a householder and one or more other people related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. In the future, it is likely that the percentage of married couples without children living with them will increase. The percentage of single parent households will also increase. Family households with no spouse present accounted for approximately 30% of the family households in Monticello in 2010. The average household size in Monticello in 2000 was 2.64 persons compared to 2.68 in 2010 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. These figures were projected to increase, according to ESRI, to 2.72 in 2016 and 2.74 by 2021. According to the American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, Monticello has seen a decrease in family households, a decrease in households with children under the age of 18, and an increase in non -family households (see Table 1-D: Household Occupancy Characteristics for further details). These trends held true from 2009-2014 aside from an outlying year (2014 - highlighted in gray on Table 1-D) when there was an increase in family households, an increase in families with children, and a decrease in nonfamily households. This may have been caused by an increased availability of single- family housing units. These trends have implications for the demand of future housing types in Monticello. Since the average household size is projected to decrease and the trend of family households has been decreasing, a shift in demand will likely occur less for 3-4 bedroom, single-family homes and more for smaller housing units, and multi -family units. 6 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB TABLE 1-D: HOUSEHOLD OCCUPANCY CHARACTERISTICS - 2009-2014 2014 68.8 43. Source: American Community Survey 5 -year Estimates Between 2010 and 2016, the number of new households (4,693 and 4,936 respectively) has grown proportionally to the increase in population (12,759 and 13,568 respectively) suggesting stability in household size (see Table I -E: Historic and Projected Households: 2010-2021). The number of households in Monticello is projected to increase by 5.3% by 2021 accounting for 18.2% of the study area's projected household growth. Place Monticello Big Lake Buffalo Elk River Becker Rogers Study Area Total Wright County Minnesota 1-E: HISTORIC AND PROJECTED HOUSEHOLDS: 2010-2021 Family Family with Children Nonfamily 1 -person 2 -person 3 -person 4 -or -more -person 2009 72.2% 47.0% 27.8% 22.0% 29.8% 18.8% 29.4% 2010 69.6% 46.4% 30.4% 25.1% 25.8% 18.6% 30.6% 2011 68.5% 45.3% 31.5% 25.8% 26.9% 16.9% 30.9% 2012 66.8% 43.8% 33.2% 26.5% 25.3% 19.1% 29.1% 2013 ' 66.2% 42.3% 33.8% 27.0% 27.0% 16.4% 29.6% 2014 68.8 43. Source: American Community Survey 5 -year Estimates Between 2010 and 2016, the number of new households (4,693 and 4,936 respectively) has grown proportionally to the increase in population (12,759 and 13,568 respectively) suggesting stability in household size (see Table I -E: Historic and Projected Households: 2010-2021). The number of households in Monticello is projected to increase by 5.3% by 2021 accounting for 18.2% of the study area's projected household growth. Place Monticello Big Lake Buffalo Elk River Becker Rogers Study Area Total Wright County Minnesota 1-E: HISTORIC AND PROJECTED HOUSEHOLDS: 2010-2021 _TABLE Change US Census 2010-2016 2016-2021 2010 2016 2021 No. % No. % 4,693 5,136* 5,399 443' 8.6% 263 4.9% 3,377 3,566 3,720 189 5.6% 154 4.3% 5,700 5,872 6,058 172 3.0% 186 3.2% 8,080 8,452 8,780 372 4.6% 328 3.9% 1,526 1,635 1,772 109 7.1% 137 8.4% 3,748 4,232 4,610 484 12.9% 378 8.9% 27,124 28,893 30,339 1,769 6.1% 1,446 4.8% 44,473 46,817 49,383 2,344 5.3% 2,566 5.5% 2,087,227 2,176,475 2,258,733 89,248 4.3% 82,258 3.8% *The 200 occupied units of the new IRET Apartment Complex were accounted for here. Note: There is potential for household growth to exceed these projections based on the housing market's recovery from the Great Recession. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts, WSB & Associates 7 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB AGE COMPOSITION & IMPACT ON HOUSING In addition to knowing how many people currently live and will likely live in Monticello, an understanding of the population's age composition can help the City plan for and provide necessary and desired services for its residents. The following provides an overview of the existing age composition of Monticello's residents and the anticipated changes in age composition that will occur through the year 2021 (see Table 1-F: Age Composition 2010-2021). Composition will remain relatively consistent outside of a slight decrease in the 25-34 age category (by 2.1%) and slight increase in the 55-64 age category (by 2.5%) which reflects aging baby boomers and a smaller succeeding generation. Extrapolating further past year 2021, Monticello can expect a surge of 7,438 residents entering the over - sixty -five (65) age group as is indicated by the red box in Table I -F. The age cohort closest to age sixty- five (65) typically is comfortable downsizing their living situation. This is a substantial number of households who will be causing the demand in housing types to change in Monticello for future years as current projections do not have a corresponding offset in future age groups. TABLE 1-F: AGE COMPOSITION 2010-2021 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts HOUSING SUPPLY Number and Types of Housing Units The US Census indicates that there were 4,693 households in Monticello in 2010: 1,749 more units than identified in 2000 (2,944). Data describing the household type, as shown below in Table I -E, was only available as an estimate. The most recent data is from the 2014 American Community Survey. Roughly, 54.5% of the housing units in 2014 were single-family detached houses: this is considerably lower than Wright County (76.4%) and lower than the State of Minnesota (67.2%). In 2014, roughly 18.2% of the housing units in Monticello were single-family attached units (townhouses): this is almost double the figure for Wright County (9.8%) and much higher than the State (7.5%). In 2014, the City also had a considerably higher percentage of multi -family housing than Wright County but was consistent with the State of Minnesota. Refer to Table I -G: Housing Supply by Type - 2014, for more information. 8 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSS 2010 2016 2021 Age I Number % Number % Number % Age 0-4 I 1,292 10.1% 1,206 8.90% 1,293 9.00% Age 5-9 I 1,101 8.6% 1,150 8.50% 1,226 8.50% Age 10 -14 I 969 7.6% 1,033 7.60% 1,163 8.10% Age 15 -19 I 823 6.5% 924 6.80% 949 6.60% Age 20 - 24 I 731 5.7% 901 6.60% 903 6.30% Age 25 - 34 I 2,255 17.7% 1,968 14.50% 2,246 15.60% Age 35 - 44 I 1,991 15.6% 2,065 15.20% 2,157 15.00% Age 45 - 54 I 1,505 11.8% 1,771 13.10% 1,682 11.70% Age 55 - 64 I 885 6.9% 1,240 9.10% 1353 9.40% Age 65 - 74 584 4.6% 751 5.50% 836 5.80% Age 75 - 84 394 3.1% 372 ' 2.70% 404 2.80% Age 85+ 229 1.8% 185 1.40% 171 1.20% Median Age 31.6 33.1 32.3 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts HOUSING SUPPLY Number and Types of Housing Units The US Census indicates that there were 4,693 households in Monticello in 2010: 1,749 more units than identified in 2000 (2,944). Data describing the household type, as shown below in Table I -E, was only available as an estimate. The most recent data is from the 2014 American Community Survey. Roughly, 54.5% of the housing units in 2014 were single-family detached houses: this is considerably lower than Wright County (76.4%) and lower than the State of Minnesota (67.2%). In 2014, roughly 18.2% of the housing units in Monticello were single-family attached units (townhouses): this is almost double the figure for Wright County (9.8%) and much higher than the State (7.5%). In 2014, the City also had a considerably higher percentage of multi -family housing than Wright County but was consistent with the State of Minnesota. Refer to Table I -G: Housing Supply by Type - 2014, for more information. 8 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSS TABLE 1-G: HOUSING SUPPLY BY TYPE - 2014 Housing Type Monticello Monticello Wright County Wright County State State 2021 Units % Units % Units % Single -Family 2,663 54.5% 37,715 76.4% 1,589,773 67.2% Detached Single -Family 889 18.2% 4,863 9.8% 176,173 7.5% Attached 2-4 Unit Multi- 123 2.5% 799 1.6% 104,411 4.4% Family 5+ Unit Multi- 787 16.1% 3,609 7.3% 410,648 17.4% Family Mobile Home 422 8.6% 2,335 4.7% 82,441 3.5% Other - 0.0% 50 0.1% 703 0.0% Total Units 1 4,884 100% 49,371 100% 2,364,149 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates Comparison and Forecast of Owner -Occupied and Renter -Occupied Units It is important to have a balance of owner -occupied and renter -occupied units. In general, many communities strive to have roughly 65-70% of their housing units owner -occupied and 30-35% renter occupied. In 2010, approximately 68% of the housing units in Monticello were owner -occupied; this is slightly lower than Wright County (75%), and about the same as the State of Minnesota (68%). During 2016, the City of Monticello's housing occupancy ratio (owner: renter) has changed slightly, with 69% of the housing units being owner occupied and 25% being renter occupied. In 2021, the housing occupancy ratio is forecasted to remain consistent with past trends. Refer to Table 1-H.• Housing Tenure by Type - 2010, for additional information. Please be aware that there is roughly a 6% gap between owner occupied housing units and renter occupied housing units; this gap will be addressed in the following section. TABLE 1-H: HOUSING TENURE - 2010 Vacancies 2021 Renter Occupied Housing Units % 2010 2016 2021 26.2% 25.3% 24.9% 14.9% 15.8% 15.9% 24.0% 24.8% 24.9% Today, the City of Monticello faces an overall housing vacancy rate of 6.0%, which is 3.4% lower than the vacancy rate for Wright County, and 5.2% lower than that of the State. Monticello's vacancy rate has increased by 0.4% since 2010 and is projected to increase by 1% in 2021 which will still be significantly lower than the County and State. Both the County and State are projected to remain consistent through year 2021. The increase of vacant housing units in Monticello can partly be explained by the fact that the number of housing units in the City increased by nearly 6% from 2010-2016, and the housing market experienced a significant decline. Please see Table 1-1 for further details. 9 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB Owner Occupied Housing Units % Location: 2010 2016 2021 Monticello I 68.2% 68.7% 68.1% Wright County 75.8% 74.7% 74.7% State of MN 64.9% 64.0% 63.9% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts Vacancies 2021 Renter Occupied Housing Units % 2010 2016 2021 26.2% 25.3% 24.9% 14.9% 15.8% 15.9% 24.0% 24.8% 24.9% Today, the City of Monticello faces an overall housing vacancy rate of 6.0%, which is 3.4% lower than the vacancy rate for Wright County, and 5.2% lower than that of the State. Monticello's vacancy rate has increased by 0.4% since 2010 and is projected to increase by 1% in 2021 which will still be significantly lower than the County and State. Both the County and State are projected to remain consistent through year 2021. The increase of vacant housing units in Monticello can partly be explained by the fact that the number of housing units in the City increased by nearly 6% from 2010-2016, and the housing market experienced a significant decline. Please see Table 1-1 for further details. 9 1 P a g e A MontiUcello WSB TABLE 1-I: VACANT HOUSING FORCAST & COMPARISION — 2010-2021 Year City Vacant Units City Percent Vacant County Percent Vacant State Percent Vacant 2010 I 280 5.6% 9.2% 11.1% 2016 I 315 6.0% 9.4% 11.2% 2021 391 7.0% 9.4% 11.2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The rental housing average vacancy rate is low in Monticello but is projected to increase indicating a demand for addition rental units at all levels of affordability. Table 2-1 indicates specific vacancy rates for eight of the rental properties in the City. TABLE 2-I: RENTAL APARTMENTS — VACANCIES AND RATES Value of Housing The median value of owner -occupied housing units in Monticello in 2016 was $179,095 and is projected to increase by $30,314 in 2021. Most housing in Monticello is valued in the range of $150,000 to $199,999, which is consistent with the County and State. In comparison to low and moderate valued housing, there is a relatively limited choice of higher valued housing units in Monticello. Only 16.5% of owner -occupied housing units have a value of $250,000 or greater compared to 38.8% in the County and 36.7% in the State. The median value of owner -occupied housing in Wright County was $216,395 and $205,288 in the State of Minnesota. Monticello needs to focus on later -stage housing opportunities to meet the demand for higher valued housing units. Refer to Table I -J.• Owner -Occupied Housing by Value -2016 for additional information. Table 24 illustrates the affect that the Great Recession had on housing values in Monticello. Note that median sale price fell below median appraised value in mid -2007, then recovered and surpassed appraised value in 201 Ito regain a more traditional relationship. Data from Table 24 came from the Wright County Assessor. MontiUcello lO1Page WSB Vacancy Rates Ridgemont Apartments 0.0% $566-$610 River Park View Apartments 0.0% 30% of income Ridgway Apartments 2.3% $460-$725 Hillside Terrace 0.0% 30% of income Cedar Crest Apartments 0.0% 30% of income Broadway Square 0.0% 30% of income 7th Street Townhomes 6.7% $825 Monticello Crossings* 1.0% $925 - $2,210 Monticello Village 3.3% $1,018—$1,610 Average Vacancy Rate 1.5% * 202 -unit IRET Apartment Complex built in 2016 Source: WSB & Associates Phone Interviews Value of Housing The median value of owner -occupied housing units in Monticello in 2016 was $179,095 and is projected to increase by $30,314 in 2021. Most housing in Monticello is valued in the range of $150,000 to $199,999, which is consistent with the County and State. In comparison to low and moderate valued housing, there is a relatively limited choice of higher valued housing units in Monticello. Only 16.5% of owner -occupied housing units have a value of $250,000 or greater compared to 38.8% in the County and 36.7% in the State. The median value of owner -occupied housing in Wright County was $216,395 and $205,288 in the State of Minnesota. Monticello needs to focus on later -stage housing opportunities to meet the demand for higher valued housing units. Refer to Table I -J.• Owner -Occupied Housing by Value -2016 for additional information. Table 24 illustrates the affect that the Great Recession had on housing values in Monticello. Note that median sale price fell below median appraised value in mid -2007, then recovered and surpassed appraised value in 201 Ito regain a more traditional relationship. Data from Table 24 came from the Wright County Assessor. MontiUcello lO1Page WSB Value Less than $50,000 $50,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 to $249,999 $250,000 to $299,999 $300,000 to $399,999 $400,000 to $499,99 $500,000 to $749,999 $750,000 to $999,999 $1,000,000 or More Median Value Source: ESRI Forecasts $210,000 $200,000 $190,000 $180,000 $170,000 $160,000 $150,000 $140,000 $130,000 TABLE 1-J: OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING BY VALUE - 2016 City Units City % Wright County % State % 411 11.4% 6.5% 6.5% 240 6.7% 4.8% 9.4% 407 11.3% 11.8% 14.7% 1282 35.5% 21.4% 17.9% 672 18.6% 16.7% 14.7% 269 7.5% 11.5% 10.3% 217 6.0% 13.2% 12.2% 65 1.8% 6.4% 6.1% 18 0.5% 4.5% 4.9% 22 0.6% 1.8% 1.9% 5 0.1% 1.4% 1.3% $179,095 $216,395 $205,288 CHART 24 MONTICELLO HOUSING VALUES THOUGH THE GREAT RECESSION 11i413Ii413Bi4139413[l4911114�411V Median Sale Median Appraised Owner Monthly Costs as Percentage of Household Income Housing decisions should not be based solely on the value of housing, but also the cost of housing expenses in relation to household income. In general, housing costs (taxes, insurance, principal, interest, etc.) should not exceed 30% of total household income. In 2014, only 19% of homeowners in Monticello had monthly costs that were more than 30% of their household income, compared to 27% in Wright County and 29% in the State of Minnesota (see Table 1-K• Owner Monthly Costs as Percent of Household Income -2014). These figures suggest that housing was more affordable in Monticello than in Wright County and the State of Minnesota in 2014 possibly due to age and livability of housing units. This is an important strength for the City as it continues to grow and evolve into a regional center linking the Twin Cities Metro with the St. Cloud MSA. Monticello should consider a goal to maintain appropriate amounts of affordable housing to mitigate the negative impacts of a housing price correction like that seen during the Great Recession (2007-2010). This will allow for the community to see steady and modestly increasing home values and reduce the 11 IPage A MontiUcello WSS likelihood of rapidly increasing home prices causing homeowners to be required to spend a larger portion of their income on housing. While the provision of affordable housing is one side of the coin, the City should also incorporate a plan to encourage the development and attraction of livable wage employment opportunities in the City. TABLE 1-K: OWNER MONTHLY COSTS AS PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME - 2014 Percent of Household Income City Units* City % County % State % Less than 20% 1,286 47.0% 39.0% 41.3% 20.0 to 24.9% 611 22.3% 18.9% 17.8% 25.0 to 29.9% I 611 11.4% 14.8% 12.3% 30.0 to 34.9% I 169 6.2% 7.6% 7.9% 35.0% or More I 361 13.2% 19.6% 20.8% Total I 2,738 100% 100% 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey *Housing Units with a Mortgage Contract Rent In 2014, rental housing units accounted for roughly 25% of the occupied housing units in Monticello. In 2014, roughly 88% of units had a monthly rent of $500 or more, which is higher than Wright County (87%), and the State of Minnesota (79%). See Table I -L: Renter -Occupied Housing Units by Gross Rent - 2010, for additional information. Monthly Rent Less than $200 $200 to $299 $300 to $499 $500 to $749 $750 to $999 $1000 to $1,499 $1,500 or more No Rent Paid Median Rent Paid TABLE 1-L: RENTER -OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY GROSS RENT - 2014 Total Specified Units 1 1,175 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey 7,106 100% 590,136 100% Renter Monthly Costs as Percentage of Household Income In 2014, 46.5% of renters paid over 30% of their household income in rent (see Table I -M.• Gross Rent as Percent of Household Income - 2014). This number is slightly lower than Wright County (47.7%) but higher than the State of Minnesota (46.1 %). This suggests that there is not an abundance of affordable rental units in Monticello and efforts should be made to decrease rental costs. MontiUcello 121Page WSB City County i State Units % Units % Units % 23 2.0% 141 2.0% 24,764 4.2% 57 4.9% 233 3.3% 31,166 5.3% 66 5.6% 582 8.2% 68,601 11.6% 367 31.2% 2136 30.1% 159,802 27.1% 322 27.4% 2012 28.3% 139,386 23.6% 306 26.0% 1514 21.3% 105,182 17.8% 34 2.9% 188 2.6% 34,297 5.8% 0 0.0% 300 4.2% 27,938 4.7% $773 $778 $747 Total Specified Units 1 1,175 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey 7,106 100% 590,136 100% Renter Monthly Costs as Percentage of Household Income In 2014, 46.5% of renters paid over 30% of their household income in rent (see Table I -M.• Gross Rent as Percent of Household Income - 2014). This number is slightly lower than Wright County (47.7%) but higher than the State of Minnesota (46.1 %). This suggests that there is not an abundance of affordable rental units in Monticello and efforts should be made to decrease rental costs. MontiUcello 121Page WSB TABLE 1-M: GROSS RENT AS A PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME - 2014 Percent of Household Income Units Percent Wright County State Less than 10% 0 0.0% 3.2% 3.5% 10 to 14.9% I 73 6.2% 8.1% 8.2% 15 to 19.9% I 205 17.4% 13.6% 12.3% 20 to 24.9% 262 22.3% 13.1% 12.5% 25 to 29.9% 72 6.1% 9.1% 11.4% 30 to 34.9% I 194 16.5% 9.7% 8.8% 35 to 39.9% I 86 7.3% 8.1% 6.1% 40 to 49.9% I 102 8.7% 9.8% 8.1% 50.0% or More I 164 14.0% 20.1% 23.1% Not Computed 17 1.4% 5.2% 6.0% Total Specified Units 1,175 100% 100% 100% Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey Age and Maintenance of Housing Stock In 2014, roughly 39% (1,910 units) of the City's units were constructed before 1990 (greater than 27 years old). Just 5.4% of the housing units in Monticello were built before 1939. Monticello has a relatively new housing stock in comparison to Wright County and the State of Minnesota, with 60.8% of housing units being built since 1990 compared with 50.4% for the County and 29.0% for the State. TABLE 1-N: YEAR STUCTURE BUILT Year Structure Built Monticello Units 2010 or later 0 2000 to 2009 I 1,697 1990 to 1999 I 1,277 1980 to 1989 I 748 1970 to 1979 I 654 1960 to 1969 I 63 1950 to 1959 96 1940 to 1949 86 1939 or Earlier 263 Total Specified Units 4,884 Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey MontiUcello Percent Wright County State 0.0% 0.7% 0.8% 34.7 32.2% 14.6% 26.1% 18.5% 13.6% 15.3% 12.2% 13.0% 13.4% 16.0% 15.6% 1.3% 4.9% 9.8% 2.0% 4.1% 10.4% 1.8% 2.3% 4.8% 5.4% 9.2% 17.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 131Page WSS LIFE -CYCLE HOUSING AND PROFILE OF HOUSEHOLDS The housing needs of a community relate to the demographic profile of the household. Typically, households move through several life -cycle stages; including entry-level households, first time homeowners, move -up buyers, empty nesters/young seniors, and senior citizens. The following describes each of these household types and the effect that they have on housing demands in Monticello. Entry -Level Households People in the 18 to 24 -year-old age group typically leave their childhood home and establish their own household. They often rent a house or an apartment because they generally do not have the income and savings needed to buy a home. In addition, many people in this age group move frequently, so they are hesitant to buy a house. They are also more likely to share housing with other unrelated people of similar age. The entry-level household population in Monticello will fluctuate annually. Many Monticello residents that graduate from high school move to other communities to attend a university or to pursue other job opportunities. In the long term, unless current conditions and trends change, Monticello is projected to see a 0.5% decrease in the 15 to 24 -year-old age group by year 2021 (Table 1-T). Job opportunities aimed at retaining this age cohort need to be strongly considered. Nevertheless, there will always be a strong need to provide affordable housing for people of all ages. First -Time Homeowners First time homeowners are typically in their 20s and 30s. They are usually "move -up" renters, meaning they "move up" from an apartment to a home. They are often married with young children, but increasingly, first time homeowners are single. They are prone to moving within several years of buying their first home for several reasons; including, increased salaries allow them to move to more expensive housing, children may require larger housing, and job opportunities may require that they move to another community. Monticello is projected to see a 0.3% increase in the 20-442 age group by year 2021 (Table I- T), which could translate into an increased demand for lower -end housing units. Move -Up Buyers Move -up buyers are typically in their 30s and 40s. They move up from the smaller, less expensive house that they had previously purchased. From an economic growth perspective, this is an important age group of people. Typically, move -up buyers have children in school and an established career. They are less likely to move to another community and start over. Also, professionals who are moving to a community to advance their career are generally looking to move to a more expensive house than what they had in their previous community. Monticello is projected to see a 0.5% decrease in the 25-543 age group by the year 2021 (Table I -F). This is 0.3% lower than the study area average of a 0.8% decrease. This may be an indicator that there is a shortage of available units for move -up buyers. Monticello must continue to 2 People in their 40s were included due to U.S. Census age groups. 3 People in their 20s and 50s were included due to U.S. Census age groups. MontiUcello 141Page A WSS ensure that it has adequate choices for those who are looking for move -up housing that will satisfy their needs until they are in their 50s and beyond. Empty Nesters and Young Seniors Empty nesters and young seniors are generally in their 50s, 60s, and early 70s. Often, their children have moved out of their house and left them with a larger house than needed. Empty nesters and young seniors often want to live in a smaller home, like a townhouse or patio home, that has less maintenance. The baby boom generation in Monticello is projected to increase by 0.6% by year 2021 (Table 1-F). A notable increase in apartment rentals in Monticello by members of this population segment is likely to occur. A large portion of these individuals will likely desire higher -end apartment complexes with quality amenities so they can maintain their current lifestyles. Senior Citizens This age group is generally in their late 70s and older and are often looking for low maintenance or assisted living housing. As the population ages, Monticello must continually ensure that it has adequate housing to meet the needs of seniors. The City is projected to see a 0.1% decrease in the 75 and older age group by year 2021 (Table 1-F). Monticello should continue to strive to be a senior -friendly community that values the contributions of seniors, promotes positive intergenerational interactions, considers the needs of seniors in community planning, supports the efforts of seniors to live independently, and acknowledges the role that family, friends, and neighbors play in the life of seniors. Special Needs Housing for those with special needs includes housing for those with mental and/or physical disabilities or health issues and those who need temporary or transitional housing. The number of people with special housing needs is expected to increase as the population of Monticello continues to age and grow. Senior Housing Market Monticello City staff members have identified a need for senior housing market analysis. Based upon population growth forecasts, household forecasts, and the current age of householders, we can extrapolate what the senior housing market will require. Table 1-0: Senior Housing Projections 2010-2021 illustrates how the change in the sixty-five and older population will affect the number of occupied housing units. By year 2021, Monticello will need 940 units suitable for senior residents to meet demand, which is an increase of 136 units from 2010. We consider senior housing to be any housing unit (affordable, renter, duplex, patio house, etc.) that meets the needs of residents sixty-five (65) and older. MontiUcello 151Page A WSS TABLE 1.0: SENIOR HOUSING PROJECTIONS — 2010-2021 Year 2010 2016 2021 Total Population 12,759 13,568 14,383 Total Occupied Units I 4,693 4,936 5,199 65+ Population I 1,207 1,308 1,411 65+ Population Percent I 9.5% 9.6% 9.8% Units Occupied by 65+ Population I 804 871 940 Percentage of Units Occupied by 65+ Population 1 17.1% 17.7% 18.1% Source: U.S. Census, ESRI Forecasts, WSB & Associates AFFORDABLE HOUSING Affordable housing is important to a strong economy and a healthy community. Increasingly, housing is not affordable for many working families and the lack of affordable housing for people of all ages and incomes causes families stress, dampens productivity and stifles job growth. Various organizations define "affordable housing" in many ways. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) generally defines housing as affordable if it costs less than thirty (30) percent of a household's income. However, HUD's Section 8 Income Guidelines are the basis for most affordable housing programs. Section 8 guidelines define low and moderate incomes on a sliding scale, depending on the number of persons in the family. For example, a four -person household is considered "moderate income" if their family income is eighty (80) percent of the area's median family income. Most housing affordability programs and data place emphasis on creating owner -occupied units at eighty (80) percent of the median family income (moderate income) and rental units at fifty (50) percent of the median family income (low income). Since low income persons are typically renters, the definition of "low income" is tied to the number of persons in each unit. This study identifies "affordable owner occupied units" as those affordable for moderate income families (eighty (80) percent of median income). Affordable rental units are based on fifty (50) percent of the median income and reflected on a per capita and per family basis. It is very important to note that the definition of "affordable" in terms of a dollar amount will continue to change as the cost of living increases and interest rates change. Therefore, the City should periodically review income/housing statistics and update the definition as warranted. Factors such as interest rates will impact housing affordability in both a positive and negative manner. Income by Age of Householder Looking at income data is also important when predicting future housing demands in the City of Monticello. In 2010, the median household income in Monticello was $68,135 ($67,963 in the County) and the largest employment industries were educational, health and social services, manufacturing, and retail trade. By 2016, the median household income increased significantly to approximately $76,954 ($73,798 in the County) and the top employment industries were the same. Monticello's median household income is projected to increase to $85,218 by 2021 ($83,257 in the County) according to ESRI Business Analyst. MontiUcello 161Page WSB Income distributions as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau can be compared to affordability standards to determine how many households and families in the City of Monticello may require affordable housing. Table I -P: Monticello Affordable Housing Units Requirements - 2016 & 2021 depicts the number of households (renter and owner) that may require affordable housing (based on family income). The gray shaded area indicates family incomes of 80% or less of the median household income ($61,449 in 2016 and $68,174 in 2021). The red box indicates family incomes of 50% or less of the median household income ($38,406 in 2016 and $42,609 in 2021). By 2021, 2,214 owner households may require affordable housing, and 1,629 renter households may require affordable housing. TABLE 1-P: MONTICELLO AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS - 2016 & 2021 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The following table illustrated the maximum affordable housing costs for renters and owners based on median income. A direct relationship exists between monthly affordable housing costs and median income. Steps should be taken in Monticello to keep housing costs affordable as housing values increase such as maintaining current affordable housing stock and assuring opportunities for the construction of new affordable housing units. TABLE 1-Q: MAXIMUM AFFORDABLE HOUSING COSTS (RENTER & OWNER) - 2016 & 2021 2016 Renter 2021 Owner Annual Household Number of Households % of Total Number of Households % of Total Income $76,811 $85,218 $76,811 $85,218 Less than $15,000 378 7.7% 411 7.9% $15,000 to $24,999 I 286 5.8% 271 5.2% $25,000 to $34,999 332 6.7% 316 6.1% $35,000 to $49,999 543 11.0% 631 12.1% $50,000 to $74,999 834 16.9% am 512 9.8°JL $75,000 to $99,999 887 18.0% 937 18.0% $100,000 to $149,999 1,262 25.6% 1,564 30.1% $150,000 to $199,999 341 6.9% 472 9.1% $200,000 and over 74 1.5% 85 1.6% Total Households 4,937 100% 5,199 100% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts The following table illustrated the maximum affordable housing costs for renters and owners based on median income. A direct relationship exists between monthly affordable housing costs and median income. Steps should be taken in Monticello to keep housing costs affordable as housing values increase such as maintaining current affordable housing stock and assuring opportunities for the construction of new affordable housing units. TABLE 1-Q: MAXIMUM AFFORDABLE HOUSING COSTS (RENTER & OWNER) - 2016 & 2021 MontiUcello 171Page WSB Renter Owner Year 2016 2021 2016 2021 Median Income $76,811 $85,218 $76,811 $85,218 Affordable Income: 50% Renter, 80% Owner $38,406 $42,609 $61,448.80 $68,174.40 30% of Affordable $11,522 $12,783 $18,434.64 $20,452.32 Income Monthly Housing Cost I $960 $1,065 $1,536.22 $1,704.36 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts MontiUcello 171Page WSB OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS This section analyses the City of Monticello's owner occupied housing market. Analyzed in this section are single-family home resale trends, home foreclosures, actively marketing subdivisions, pending subdivisions, interviews with local real estate professionals and others involved in the local housing market to gain their feedback on existing market conditions and trends. The Wright County Assessor's Office provided data on resale trends. The following are key findings regarding the owner -occupied housing market. Home Resale Trends The average resale price of single-family homes in Monticello in 2016 was $202,073 and there were 342 sales. This was an increase in price from 2015 ($169,025 and 266 sales). While some of the price changes from year to year can be attributed to the age and quality of the homes sold during a year, an interview with a realty expert indicated the average resale price likely bottomed out in 2011 and slow price appreciation is expected to continue to bring prices back to a more market -neutral level. Median sale price is often a more reliable measure of price trends. In Monticello, the median sale price of single- family homes increased from $171,500 in 2015 to $185,269 in 2016, which reflects an increase of 8% for that period. TABLE 1-R: RE -SALE TRENDS OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES Year Number of Sales Median Sale Price Average Sale Price 2015 266 $171,500 $ 169,025 2016 342 185,269 $ 202,073 Source: Wright County Assessor's Office; WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 1-S shows the number of home sales in 2016 by the decade the homes were built. In 2016, 181 of the 342 (52.9%) single-family homes sold were built during year 2000 or later. Similarly, Table 1-N showed that approximately 34.7% of Monticello's owner -occupied single-family homes were built after 2000. Only 11.7% of the sales in 2016 were homes built prior to 1980. This highlights the relatively large supply of newer homes available to potential new residents moving to the community. Table I -S also highlights how the median sale price decreases as the homes get older. Most homes sold in Monticello in 2016 for under $170,000 were built before 1980. Homes priced above $180,000 were generally built since 2000. TABLE 1-S: HOME SALES BY DECADE BUILT 2016 Decade I Number of Sales Percentage Median Sale Price 1970 and Older I 27 7.9% $151,509 1971-1980 13 3.8% $166,000 1981-1990 I 23 6.7% $157,500 1991-2000 I 98 28.7% $181,467 2001-2010 I 132 38.6% $193,951 2010-2016 49 14.3% $221,050 Total: I 342 100.0% Source: Wright County Assessor's Office �01[�o 18Page A WSB Foreclosures Beginning in the middle of the last decade, home foreclosures began to have a significant impact on housing markets across the nation. Initially, most foreclosures occurred among buyers with lower credit ratings who had sub -prime mortgages. Gradually, foreclosure activity increased as jobs plummeted and home prices sank precipitously. Foreclosures have gradually decreased over the past few years as housing markets have stabilized. Table I -T presents foreclosure data for Wright County and Minnesota. The data are considered "Sheriff's Sales Foreclosures" and was compiled by the Minnesota Homeownership Center and published on their website. There were 7,212 foreclosures in Minnesota in 2015. This was down from 8,313 in 2014 and significantly lower than 11,834 in 2013. Wright County had 205 foreclosures in 2015, down from 240 in 2014 and 372 in 2013. Wright County has maintained a higher foreclosure rate than Minnesota. The foreclosure rate, as shown in Table 1-T, is defined as the number of foreclosed mortgages as a percent of total residential parcels. In 2015, Wright County's foreclosure rate was 0.49% compared to 0.40% in Minnesota. Foreclosures have hindered Wright County's housing market as they have other areas of the State. Out of 87 counties in the State, only 6 had a higher foreclosure count than Wright County. Those counties were Saint Louis, Washington, Dakota, Anoka, Ramsey, and Hennepin. TABLE 1-T: HOME FORECLOSURES WRIGHT COUNTY, 2013 to 2015 Sources: Minnesota Homeownership Center, HousingLink Single -Family Listings Based on a review of various Realtor websites, there were 77 single-family homes actively listed for sale in Monticello in November 2016. The homes were unevenly distributed by price range; weighted heavier toward higher priced homes. Only two (2) homes were priced below $120,000 and 68 priced $150,000 or higher listed for sale. Four (4) homes were listed for sale between $100,000 and $150,000. The average list price of homes on the market was $271,759 in November 2016. While homes typically sell for less than the list prices, the current prices suggest that Monticello should continue to see appreciation in home prices since the low point in 2011. Existing Lot Supply There are currently a limited number of lots available to accommodate new single-family homes in Monticello. The City is experiencing a shortage in buildable lots as bank owned lots have been purchased and developed. As of the end of 2016, there are a total of 74 single-family lots and sites that can accommodate up to 101 multi -family units. Permit numbers have steadily recovered from the 2010 and 2011 low point (two single family permits issued each year) to the issuance of 61 single-family permits in 2016. Prior to the recession, the City issued more than 300 permits annually. During that time (2002- 2007) housing lots were selling in the $70,000490,000 range. The sale price of lots fell by more than 80% after the recession. Bank foreclosures of developers resulted in existing lots becoming bank owned 191Page A MontiUcello WSB Wright County Minnesota Year Number of Foreclosures Foreclosure Rate Number of Foreclosures Foreclosure Rate 2013 372 0.89% 11,834 0.64% 2014 240 0.57% 8,313 0.46% 2015 205 0.49% 7,212 0.40% Sources: Minnesota Homeownership Center, HousingLink Single -Family Listings Based on a review of various Realtor websites, there were 77 single-family homes actively listed for sale in Monticello in November 2016. The homes were unevenly distributed by price range; weighted heavier toward higher priced homes. Only two (2) homes were priced below $120,000 and 68 priced $150,000 or higher listed for sale. Four (4) homes were listed for sale between $100,000 and $150,000. The average list price of homes on the market was $271,759 in November 2016. While homes typically sell for less than the list prices, the current prices suggest that Monticello should continue to see appreciation in home prices since the low point in 2011. Existing Lot Supply There are currently a limited number of lots available to accommodate new single-family homes in Monticello. The City is experiencing a shortage in buildable lots as bank owned lots have been purchased and developed. As of the end of 2016, there are a total of 74 single-family lots and sites that can accommodate up to 101 multi -family units. Permit numbers have steadily recovered from the 2010 and 2011 low point (two single family permits issued each year) to the issuance of 61 single-family permits in 2016. Prior to the recession, the City issued more than 300 permits annually. During that time (2002- 2007) housing lots were selling in the $70,000490,000 range. The sale price of lots fell by more than 80% after the recession. Bank foreclosures of developers resulted in existing lots becoming bank owned 191Page A MontiUcello WSB and ultimately being developed quickly. Many of the approved single family pre -plats were not completed due to the diminished demand for new homes. Refer to Table 1-U for full details. TABLE 1-U: AVAILABLE PLATTED & UTILITY SERVICED LOTS Development Featherstone Hunters Crossing Hillside Farm Spirit Hills Sunset Ponds Carlisle Village Autumn Ridge Eastview Club West Pine View Total Source: City of Monticello Single Family Lots Multi Family Lots 15 0 22 0 0 5 21 0 7 17 0 79 1 0 7 0 1 0 74 101 In mid -2016, the average price of a lot was about $20,000. As the housing market has improved and lot prices have increased due to the limited supply, it has allowed for an increase in prices for new single family lots. The new housing price situation is further aggravated by the limited number of remaining small home builders which have either closed or changed professions due to the recession and is now resulting in higher construction costs. According to a Monticello realty expert, another critical factor impacting the demand for single family homes is the degree to which first-time home buyers are riddled with college debt and unable to afford the price of a new home. The interest rate for new home loans has increased slightly from an all-time low of 3.4% during the depths of the recession to approximately 4.25% in late 2016. Monticello's average re -sale price currently sits in the five to seven percent range and is expected to go up. There are no major complaints or concerns among current homeowners looking to move up into more expensive homes. However, Monticello currently lacks availability of lots that are attractive for higher end housing. The community should focus on the development or attraction of a high-end housing development. The two -major upper -bracket areas (Carlisle Village and Briar Oakes Boulevard) have limited availability of undeveloped lots and are surrounded by agricultural uses. City -annexed land west of Monticello provides development opportunities but is unattractive to developers looking to build higher -market homes due to the lack of natural amenities and features generally associated with high end housing areas. Single-family Housing Permits The City of Monticello issued sixty-one (61) building permits in 2016. This number is up 38.6% from 2015 when forty-four (44) permits were issued (6 attached and 38 detached). To meet demand, the City will need to continue this trend. Please refer to Table I -C for additional information. MontiUcello 201Page WSS RENTAL HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS Affordable Rental Housing This section of the report analyses the affordable rental housing market in Monticello. The analysis includes data collected from Affordable Housing Online. All the properties in this section are general occupancy. As shown in the demographic and housing stock overview sections, there are approximately 1,175 renter households in Monticello which is down 127 households from 2010. The overwhelming majority of renters live in larger multifamily properties. There are approximately 2,923 renters (24% of total population) living in Monticello. As of 2014, 25% of total Monticello households were renter -occupied, compared to 15.6% for Wright County, and 28% for the State of Minnesota. Properties that include units assisted by federal programs were surveyed as part of this analysis. In total, eight (8) properties with 322 units were surveyed. Twenty-six (26) percent of the City's rental units are federally subsidized. Monticello's federally assisted affordable rental housing stock includes properties financed through the following programs: TABLE 1-V: FEDERALLY ASSISTED AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING STOCK Program I Properties Units Section 8 I 2 74 LIHTC I 3 102 RD 515 I 6 189 Total 9 307 Note: The total does not necessarily equal the sum of each program as some properties may participate in multiple funding programs Source: Affordable Housing Online The average number of units per property for affordable rentals in Monticello is 34. The largest federally assisted affordable rental community in Monticello is Ridgemont Apartments at 48 units and the smallest is Hillside Terrace II at 12 units. Two apartment properties provide housing for seniors totaling 59 units. All 307 units include some form of rental assistance (like Section 8) to make rent more affordable for very low income families. In Monticello, a family of four must earn $42,900 or less to qualify for Section 8 housing. See Table I- W.- Federally Assisted Units by Property for details. TABLE I -W: FEDERALLY ASSISTED UNITS BY PROPERTY Name Sec 8 LIHTC RD 515 Senior Broadway Square - - 28 Cedar Crest Apartments 38 - Hillside Terrace -- Monticello I 36 - Hillside Terrace II - 12 Ridgeway Apartments - 44 - River Park View Apartments 31 31 31 Ridgemont Apartments - 48 - Source: Affordable Housing Online Note: Not all unit counts are available from HUD MontiUcello 21 JPage WSB Photographs of Monticello Apartment Buildings Image 2: River Park View Apartments Image 1: Ridgemont Apartments 0644w—, Image 3: Hillside Terrace Image 6: Ridgeway Apartments MontiUcello Image 4: Cedar Crest Apartments Image 5: Broadway Square 221Page A WSS Image 8: 7th Street Townhomes Image 7: Monticello Crossings a - - There are currently three future housing development sites that have been identified in Monticello. Site A is an 11.93 -acre area located at 506 Territorial Road and is the site of the historic registered Rand House which was the home of the Minnegasco founders. This site is zoned low density residential (R-1) and performance-based overlay and may be used for the development of a senior housing apartment complex with sixty to eighty units (60-80) in addition to forty (40) patio homes. The Rand House would be used as a community center and guest home for the development. Rezoning this area using the planned unit development (PUD) process may be the best option to allow for this higher density development. The uniqueness of the property and the City's need for additional senior housing units could be used to justify the PUD. Also, we believe the proposed housing development is consistent with the purpose of the performance based enhancement district. Site B is a 6.4 -acre area located north of the lake on the corner of Elm Street and 7t' Street West. It is zoned for medium density residential (R-3) and may be used for multifamily, senior, or market -rate development. It is within proximity to the Cub Food Store and the Community Center. The site's southern exposure to the wetland pond offers an attractive natural amenity. Finally, Site C is located at the corner of Locust Street and 31 Street West and has already been approved for the construction of a twenty-three (23) unit three story residential development. As stated earlier in the "Senior Housing Market" section, from 2010-2021 Monticello will need to construct 136 new senior housing units to meet the forecasted demand. Sites A and B have both been identified as ideal locations for senior housing development. Depending on the number of units permitted on each of these sites, and on how many senior housing units have been constructed from 2010-2016, Monticello may need to identify more sites suitable for senior housing. i a Monticello 231Page A WSB Image 9: Site A � Monticello Image 10: Site B Image 11: Site C 241Page A WSB DEMAND ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS This section of the report utilizes data collected in the previous sections to calculate demand for owned and rental housing in Monticello through 2021. Housing Demand Analysis Demand for additional housing in Monticello will primarily come from household growth. Replacement of older homes will contribute to the need for additional residential development, as will pent-up demand. Table 1 X outlines our calculations for owner and rental housing demand in Monticello from 2017 to 2021. TABLE 1-X: POTENTIAL HOUSING DEMAND OVER NEXT 5 YEARS 2017 to 2021 A. Household growth* I 500 B. Replacement Demand I 10 C. Total housing growth (A+B) I 510 Range to occur over next 5 years: D. Percent rental demand 30% to 35% E. Rental housing demand (C x D) 153 to 179 F. Pent-up rental demand 64 64 G. Total rental housing demand (E+F) 217 to 243 H. Percent owner demand 1 65% to 70% I. Total owner housing demand (C x H) 1332 to 357 * Includes projected growth for Monticello (263 households) and one-fifth the growth in the remainder of the market area (237) Sources: US Census Bureau, ESRI forecasts, WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 1-E shows that Monticello is projected to add 263 households between 2016 and 2021 and the remainder of the market area is projected to add 1,183 households. We estimate that Monticello can capture one-fifth of the demand in the remainder of the market area, or 237 households, by providing greater housing choices to retain and attract some potential residents who otherwise would live in the surrounding areas. Thus, an additional 500 housing units would need to be developed from 2017 to 2021 to satisfy projected household growth in Monticello. Replacement demand is generated from the loss of housing or the need to replace housing units that are physically or functionally obsolete. A review of Monticello's housing stock from the U.S. Census revealed that there are about 340 housing units built prior to 1950. It can be assumed that these homes' values are decreasing at a faster rate relative to other types of housing. Most of these homes are in good condition', and we estimate that 0.5% percent per year should be removed annually from the housing supply because of obsolescence, which equates to two units every year or ten units over the next five years. A healthy rental market is expected to have a vacancy rate of about 5% to allow for sufficient consumer choice and unit turnover. With pent-up demand (a shortage of units), persons who would normally form 4 Good condition meaning that these homes do not need renovated or demolished. 251Page A Monticello WSB their own rental households, instead decide to move in with other persons in a housing unit, live with their parents, or live in housing outside of the area and commute to jobs. In 2016, Monticello had an estimated 1,300 rental households, of which 20 units (1.5% from Table 2-1) were vacant. This percentage is well below the stabilized vacancy rate. In order to bring the overall vacancy rate to a balanced 5%, about 64 additional rental units would need to be added to the city. Based on demographic and market trends, we project 30% to 35% of the housing demand from household growth and replacement -need in Monticello between 2017 and 2021 will be for rental housing. There is a total of demand for approximately 217 to 243 rental households (about 44 to 49 annually). This demand is for all types of rental housing — from subsidized and market rate general occupancy housing to senior housing. An estimate of 65% to 70% of housing demand in Monticello between 2017 and 2021 is projected to be for owner -occupied housing. This equates to demand for 332 to 357 households from 2017 to 2021 (66 to 71 homes annually.). This would equate to the projected demand for single-family homes and townhomes. These demand projections are based upon the housing market's behavior over that last ten years. During this time, we experienced the market correction of 2009-2013 which greatly impacted the calculations causing the projections to be historically low. It can be anticipated that if the housing market continues its recovery, the demand for both rental -occupied and owner -occupied households will be greater than the projections. It can be further extrapolated that in response to the increased regulations on mortgages, and the high rates of student debt, the demand for rental housing will dramatically increase. Other Housing Recommendations Projected demand for new housing products in Monticello through the remainder of the decade from current and future residents is outlined on the preceding pages. In addition, there are other programs that Monticello can implement to assist in meeting local housing needs and improving the quality of the existing stock. The key programs/initiatives that Monticello should pursue are outlined below. • Monticello needs to closely monitor rental vacancy rates and availability as new rental properties are added to the community. The addition of the 202 -unit Monticello Crossing apartment complex has set a precedent with 200 of its units being occupied during a very short timeframe. This indicates a clear pent-up demand that should continue to increase at the housing market recovers from the correction. • Monticello should also work towards converting vacant housing units into renter -occupied to reach 30-35% of total housing units. In its current state, the rental housing inventory sits at 25% of total housing units. As seen in Table 1-1, the City is projected to have seventy-six (76) additional vacancies. • Monticello needs to maintain its low housing costs and low percentage (19%) of residents paying more than 30% of their monthly household income on housing to reduce the negative impacts from another housing correction like 2006-08. This percentage is much lower than county and state averages (27% and 29% respectively). • Monticello should make efforts to increase affordable rental housing inventory so they are available for younger generations of citizens as well as baby -boomers and empty -nesters. The latter two cohorts of residents are downsizing their living spaces and need affordable places to 261Page A Monticello WSS live. Combining affordable housing options with job opportunities could lead to an increase in 19 -24 -year-old residents. • Monticello should also ensure an adequate amount of higher -end rental units for higher -income individuals looking to retire and downsize their living quarters. While these individuals are looking for smaller spaces, they are not willing to surrender the amenities to which they have grown accustom. • With the expected increase in the percentage of residents over the age of sixty-five (65), Monticello needs to increase their stock of senior housing units. Refer to Table 1-0 for projected figures. • Monticello should consider the development of housing in the downtown area to accommodate young seniors and millennial residents. Both cohorts share the same preference for areas that are rich with amenities and walkable, and housing properties that have lower maintenance requirements. Providing residents with downtown housing options is critical if the city wishes to achieve population age diversity and a complete life -cycle housing environment. t'ly. rvj;: of x P v IT CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 2020-07 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED USE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT BY DUFFY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "AUTHORITY") and the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") have received a request to assist an entity to be formed by Duffy Development Company, Inc. (the "Developer") with certain costs of construction of an approximately 53 -unit affordable multifamily rental housing development in the City of Monticello (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, in 2017, the City engaged WSB to conduct a comprehensive housing market study, which was completed in July of 2017 and provides recommendations on the amount and type of housing that could be built in the City to satisfy demand from current and future residents through 2021, and which showed a demand for affordable rental housing in the City; and WHEREAS, a stated goal of the Authority's 2020 Annual Economic Development Work Plan is to act as a partner in creating affordable housing development for the community; and WHEREAS, the success of the Developer's application for low-income housing tax credits in connection with the Project is predicated on local support of the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that the Authority indicate its support of the use of tax increment for the Project; and WHEREAS, Authority staff has reviewed the proposal and recommends that the Board of Commissioners support the use of tax increment for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority that: 1. The Board of Commissioners supports the Project and the use of tax increment financing for the Project; provided, however, that authorization of tax increment financing for the Project is solely within the discretion of the City and of the Board of Commissioners following all legally required proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statues 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended, including (i) a public hearing and approval by the City Council of the City; (ii) a determination, based on an analysis performed by the City's municipal advisor, that tax increment financing assistance is necessary for the Project; (iii) verification of development financing need, based on an analysis performed by the City's municipal advisor, that substantiates that "but for" the use of tax increment financing, the Project would be unable to proceed; and (iv) the negotiation of a development agreement including (among other things) the conditions under which the City or the Authority will provide financial assistance. 2. The Board of Commissioners supports the Developer's application to MHFA for tax credits for the Project. 3. The Board of Commissioners recommends that the City Council of the City adopt a resolution supporting the Developer's application to MHFA for tax credits for the Project and expressing support for providing tax increment financing assistance to the Developer for the Project. Adopted by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority this 24th day of June, 2020. ATTEST: 2 Presiden FRAM �2030 .W n R K partnering for the future 1 r 0 \ 1 To: Partnership Re: Framework 2030 Project Update Date: May 28, 2020 This is the first of what we intend to be regular updates to the Partnership highlighting completed, in -progress, and planned (short term) tasks for the Framework 2030 planning project. See below for contact information if you have questions. The project timeline has been revised and is included on the final page of this memo. Brackets "[#.#]" indicate task item reference from Regional Planning Scope. Component 1: Preparation Completed • Orientation and project preparation o Plan, study, and data library [1.3] o Regional tour (consultants) [1.1] o Partner / consultant one-on-one interviews [1.1] • Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o New brand and logo [1.4] o Key messages and Frequently Asked Questions [1.5] o Project communications plan [1.5] o Press Release #1 [1.6] o Project webpage [1.6] o Outreach portal [1.6] o Organization chart [1.6] Component 2: Engagement Completed • Stakeholder engagement planning o Stakeholder mapping exercise [2.1] o Engagement planning matrix [2.1] o Tailored online survey development [2.1.1] o Physical survey and discussion kits [2.1.1] o Stock engagement invitation letters [2.1.1] • Stakeholder engagement execution Framework 2030 Project Update Page 1 of 3 Partner workshop (April 30 Virtual session) [2.1.1] Initial survey invitation distribution (500+ entities, organizations, or individuals)[2.1.1] Initial feedback review [2.1.1] Next 30 days • Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o Continued website updates [1.6] o Revised FAQs [1.6] • Round 1 Stakeholder engagement execution [2.1.1] o Ongoing monitoring of submissions [2.1.1] o Midstream reporting to Liaison Team [2.1.1] o Continued sharing of engagement invitations and coaching [2.1.1] o Review and refinement of messages and invitation process [2.1.1] o Maintenance and monitoring of submissions [2.1.1] • Round 2 Stakeholder engagement planning o Round 2 definition and planning [2.1.2] 30-60 days • Round 1 stakeholder engagement execution [2.1.1] o Databasing and theming of input [2.1.1] o Reporting and sharing of central findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [2.1.1] • Round 2 stakeholder engagement planning [2.1.2] o Round 2 definition and planning [2.1.2] o Key questions (analysis integration) [2.1.2] o Threshold decision on how to proceed [2.1.2] o Material development [2.1.2] • Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o Press release #2 [1.5] Component 3: Analysis Completed • Baseline conditions and trends analysis [3.1] o Plan audit and review [3.1] o Policy matrix [3.1] o Research and analysis along three tracks (demographics, economics, and place -based conditions) [3.1] o Factbook Briefings prepared to date: April 6 -People, April 16 -Prosperity, April 24 -Place [3.1] o Briefing of Partners during April 30 session, see meeting Presentation. with Briefing highlights starting on page 7 [3.1] Next 30 days • Baseline conditions and trends analysis [3.1] o Findings briefings (Market deep dive and COVID impacts pre -assessment, regional interdependence, other topics to be identified) [3.1] Framework 2030 Project Update Page 2 of 3 o Consolidation of all findings into master briefing deck [3.1] o Presentation of master briefings deck on project website [3.1] • Growth Management and Land Use Analysis [3.2] o Research and analysis process and outline [3.2] o Policy evaluation and matrix [3.2] o Focused Planning Area consolidated zoning, development character, future land use mapping [3.2] o Growth capacity analysis [3.2] • Economic Analysis [3.3] o Initial assessment of economic development ecosystem [3.3] o Information interviews [3.3] 30-60 days • Growth Management and Land Use Analysis [3.2] o Sharing of initial findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.2] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.2] • Economic Analysis [3.3] o Sharing of initial findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.3] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.3] • Framework development [4.1] o Initial concept development and discussion [4.1] First Last Affiliation Position Email Kyle May Planning NEXT Project Consultant kyle(cDplanning-next.com Anne Carroll Carroll, Franck & Assoc Process consultant carrfran(@gmail.com, 651-690-9162 Marc Schneider Sherburne County Liaison Team lead Marc.Schneider(cDco.sherburne.mn.us 763-442-1285 Framework 2030 Project Update Page 3 of 3 The information below was prepared for the elected body of each member of the Partnership, to ensure they are fully apprised of and have the chance to contribute to the Partnership's work. Partnership I What is now the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership was first formed in 2016 focused on transportation issues, and in 2019 re -constituted itself to collaborate on regional planning and economic development. The Partnership is committed to "creating a shared regional vision and goals, then working together to accomplish them." Learn more, stay updated, and participate via the Partnership's website: https://regionalplanningpartnership.org/. The Partnership's structure is illustrated and described in the graphic below. Partners Liaison Team (Planners) Provides input and recommendations to the Partnership and receives and acts on their direction. Administrators Provide input, action items, and information to the Partnership and receive and act on their direction. Consultants Offer expertise and guidance to the Partnership and receive and act on their direction. July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 1 Partner communities anticipate significant growth and development in the coming decades, and in late 2019 the Partnership launched Framework 2030 -- the region's first collaborative planning and economic development effort. Partners are collaborating on this project to optimize regional and local benefits so we can maintain a high quality of life for area residents, businesses, and visitors. This means access to nature, development that brings high -paying jobs and other amenities to the region, the range of housing that people need, and a robust infrastructure that supports critical transportation, technology, and utility requirements. Each of the communities within the Partnership has its own unique history, vision, and values, and each retains local control over land use and economic development. At the same time, the Partnership understands that robust growth presents challenges and opportunities that require regional coordination. Planning and improvements developed from a regional perspective have the potential to create incredible, dynamic, and long-lasting benefits that support the region long into the future. The anticipated land use and economic development framework will provide critical guidance to support that success. As a collaborative regional project, Framework 2030 will: • Engage the public in a conversation about the future vision for the region and its communities • Create a unified set of regional goals, policies, and priorities that position Partners for success • Develop strategies to leverage opportunities that benefit all the communities of Sherburne and Wright Counties The focused planning area for Framework 2030 includes the three cities/four townships in Sherburne and Wright Counties as shown on the map below. Planning Area FRAME f30 July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 2 Progress Update To: Partnership Re: Framework 2030 Project Update Date: July 2, 2020 This is the second of what we intend to be regular updates to the Partnership highlighting completed, in -progress, and planned (short term) tasks for the Framework 2030 planning project. See below for contact information if you have questions. The project timeline has been revised and is included on the final page of this memo. Brackets "[#.#]" indicate task item reference from Regional Planning Scope. Component 1: Preparation Completed Orientation and project preparation o Plan, study, and data library [1.3] o Regional tour (consultants) [1.1] o Partner / consultant one-on-one interviews [1.1] Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o New brand and logo [1.4] o Key messages and Frequently Asked Questions [1.5] o Project communications plan [1.5] o Press Release #1 [1.6] o Project webpage [1.6] o Outreach portal [1.6] o Organization chart [1.6] Component 2: Engagement Completed Stakeholder engagement planning o Stakeholder mapping exercise [2.1] o Engagement planning matrix [2.1] o Tailored online survey development [2.1.1] o Physical survey and discussion kits [2.1.1] o Stock engagement invitation letters [2.1.1] Stakeholder engagement execution o Partner workshop (April 30 Virtual session) [2.1.1] o Initial survey invitation distribution (500+ entities, organizations, or individuals)[2.1.1] o Initial feedback review [2.1.1] o Midstream reporting to Liaison Team [2.1.1] o Continued sharing of engagement invitations and coaching [2.1.1] o Review and refinement of messages and invitation process [2.1.1] o Maintenance and monitoring of submissions [2.1.1] July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 3 Next 30 days • Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o Continued website updates [1.6] o Revised FAQs [1.6] • Round 1 Stakeholder engagement execution [2.1.1] o Ongoing monitoring of submissions [2.1.1] • Round 2 Stakeholder engagement planning o Round 2 definition and planning [2.1.2] • Round 1 stakeholder engagement execution [2.1.1] o Databasing and theming of input [2.1.1] o Reporting and sharing of central findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [2.1.1] 30-60 days Round 2 stakeholder engagement planning [2.1.2] o Round 2 definition and planning [2.1.2] o Key questions (analysis integration) [2.1.2] o Threshold decision on how to proceed [2.1.2] o Material development [2.1.2] Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o Press release #2 [1.5] Component 3: Analysis Completed Baseline conditions and trends analysis [3.1] o Plan audit and review [3.1] o Policy matrix [3.1] o Research and analysis along three tracks (demographics, economics, and place -based conditions) [3.1] o Factbook Briefings prepared to date: April 6 -People, April 16 -Prosperity, April 24 -Place [3.1] o Briefing of Partners during April 30 session, see meeting Presentation, with Briefing highlights starting on page 7 [3.1] • Market Area Analysis [3.3] o Sharing of initial findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.3] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.3] • Economic Analysis [3.3] o Sharing of initial findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.3] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.3] July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 4 • Baseline conditions and trends analysis [3.1] o Findings briefings (Market deep dive and COVID impacts pre -assessment, regional interdependence, other topics to be identified) [3.1] o Consolidation of all findings into master briefing deck [3.1] o Presentation of master briefings deck on project website [3.1] • Growth Management and Land Use Analysis [3.2] o Research and analysis process and outline [3.2] o Policy evaluation and matrix [3.2] o Focused Planning Area consolidated zoning, development character, future land use mapping [3.2] o Growth capacity analysis [3.2] Economic Analysis [3.3] o Initial assessment of economic development ecosystem [3.3] o Information interviews [3.3] • Baseline Analysis Infographic [3.3] Next 30 days • Growth Management and Land Use Analysis [3.2] o Sharing of deep -dive briefings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.2] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.2] 30-60 days • Framework development [4.1] o Initial concept development and discussion [4.1] First Last Affiliation Position Email Kyle May Planning NEXT Project Consultant kyle(cDplanning-next.com Anne Carroll Carroll, Franck & Assoc Process consultant carrfranC>gmail.com, 651-690-9162 Marc Schneider Sherburne County Liaison Team lead Marc.Schneider(cDco.sherburne.mn.us 763-442-1285 Factbook Briefings: Highlights From April through July 2020, the consulting team presented in-depth and relevant information from the baseline conditions and trends analysis work in this first phase of the project. Below are highlights from each of those briefings. For more information: • Complete Factbook Briefings to view online or download • Infographic with this summary information to view, download, and share July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 5 People (April 9, 2020) g * Demographic conditions and tren ds of I People the reg fonafpop u�atfon Download presenutiom htt s: b ItLV2n Wsl Signi�cant, but unevenly distributed, population growth 300,000 Regional Population Over Time 2050-270,000 2040 250,000 +4 2010 2018 i2EG14NAL PLAN N I N G AREA 200,000 5herbumeand Wright Counties Regkmal Pop. Change 1000 Gro -fn rare From 0XV k]urbm's 1ne 150,000 sfars rare t+fr#rk 2990 100,000 M0 50,000 +Sherbume County +Wright County Regional PlanningArea 0 Of Of 0 so "W Shrinking household +105% +60 +30% size, but faster family formation and growth Househoids with Persons living Hou5Ao0s with compared to state one ormore people atone, +5,500 chhdren under 65+1+8,700 18,+6,000 Young for Minnesota, but aging faster than the state's rate of change 20% Regional Age Distribution .18% (2000 - 2018) . 166 +12,000 * #p Inemme In rivAdenea over 55 229 Inerense In rGsidenis 1 e1 under 34, +24,5QQ 2% ■ RP. 2000 ■ FRA. 2018 M ME ME No ■:: dttc.2000 ■faro-. ..8 I I 0�6 0 ro 5 5 to 9 10 to 14 25 to 19 20 ro 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 td 54 55 In 59 50 ro 54 55pfas +260% KEY FIN DINt: Change in Hispanic & Increasing racial and ethnic diversity, but Latinx Population still more homogeneous than the state �ncreaseof5,000res"rdents from 1000, +779 for the state July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 6 Prosperity (April 16, 2020) ity Levels of persona prosperity and economic ]Prosperperformance across the p�atamng area Download presentation: https-1b1t.LV2V€OsNI MEQ' FINPFN' Shuts in employment by industrio I sector, overall growth is 60P,, totoIjobs, and the number of business establishments ;151 69;364 + *I Number of Business Total Regional Jobs Regional GDR Growth Establishments* increase of 10,500 jobs $8.2 biiiion in 2018, up $21 biibn Wrthin the two -county reg ion from 2009 frorn2010 for the two -county `An esmbfishmentis a sin4dehersrnessthotmay have any numberaf empfoyees regfon L 1, T , r. 5,981 La kkM1 k 9,203 2i Ld p Wpaawr ccuNTY--"'---- 9 +510 Change in Median Household income From 2000 to 2018, increase from $55, 000 to $84, 000 I KEY FINDING SHERISuiiNE COUNTY ostregioiralemptOyeesCOM mute in from outside the region, and mastregionai residents commute to work outside Res d@nts who €ommute 9,203 Into the FPA` for work .sjpi Residents who five and work in the FPA* Residents who €ommute 1r4,(- outs idetheFPA' for work 'Forused P arming Arev (FPA) - big Lake, Becker, Morxkdfo, and Silver Creek Twps. & the nares of Recker, Big toW, oradMonVre6 FIN'' Nigher Ieve Is o f personal and fam ily pro s p erity compared to the state; consistent Levels o f educatioiial attainment Regional Educational Attainment (2018) 3 ° REGIONALPLANNINGARU(RPA) 25,E Sherburne and Wrot Counties 20% — 15% RPA 10% state 546 — m 1 July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 7 Place (April 24, 2020) place -based eondltfons and trends focusing Place I on mobfbty, land use, and bottling Download presentation! httpsaNtjW31bd1Tq targe Focused Planning Areo {FPA) - twice the size of Minneapolis & St. Paul combine) Ronye o f place -types from urban to ruroI Spokane, WA 1,366miles ' . Becke. rwn Fargo, ND r, 198 Milos r�}, �� If 6eeker i r S 11 ver Grmek Txy LA4• r4�rir 4[ara aFr� WRIGHT COUNTY G) #Aonth�ccllo Tru p. 201 q.i. Focused Planning Area Aim osttake the size of the cities of Mfnneapoits & St. Iaaui comb fned SHER8URNE CO.UNTY i yirn+nl.r�rr I B I g L a k a T w p, Chicago, IC 500 Miles Kl=Y FINDING Regional, mufti -modal connectivity including bike trails and rail othertypes KEY FIN DING. 17,523 units Majority of housing between 10-30 (20% of housing) years oid, predominantly of a single type I I Elk Riap- Chi€ago, IL _ 492 miles .- 1 39,000 Average Vehicles Cross over the M 1V Hjghway 25 bridge dally Age of Housing Stock (Regional Planning Area, 2018) $h9J't1'lfrii9 ■ Wright P YI S#a+e Plumes kuili between 1 I I Wo a 3008 i I C.FwedlnF 7%N rhe Srafk 1 k 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I II I■■ �1 I 1INo iron BWft1939 8udit1940 Badt1950 Barlt1960 DfAt1970 Bift1900 9udt19909ur,t2000 9urlt2oi0 9uik20l4 or earlier to 2949 to 1959 to 1964 to 1979 Do 2989 to 2999 to 2609 to 2013 or iatw 3596 3096 2596 2096 E% 106 596 096 July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 8 Additional briefings Highlights from the remaining briefings will be available in the next month or two. • Market (presented May 28, 2020) • Economic Performance (presented June 25, 2020) • Land Use (to be presented July 23, 2020) Engagement Update Process, Content As noted above, there is strong stakeholder engagement for each of the major phases of Framework 2030. Round 1 engagement supported Baseline Conditions and Trends Analysis, gathering big -picture ideas about the region and communities today and in the future. These results are being used to shape the next phase of the planning project, focusing on growth, land use, and economic analysis. Round 1 engagement was originally intended to be both in-person and online, but COVID guidelines moved it all online. It ran from early April through 30 June 2020, seeking input from a wide variety of key stakeholders throughout the region via four surveys: community members, employees of private businesses and public entities, organizations (businesses, nonprofits, and other), and elected and appointed officials throughout the region. The questions were qualitative and covered a variety of topics; below are some examples: • Community: When you talk with people who aren't from your local community or town, what do you say makes your community special, unique, or important to you/your family? What makes you optimistic about the future? What are your greatest concerns or questions? • Region: What will make this region attractive for people to stay or move here? What is needed to meet the region's future employment, educational, housing, or transportation needs of the region? In what ways might you help the region continue to be attractive and appealing to current and future residents? What are some key business and economic development priorities in the future? What are critical barriers or challenges to strong business growth and development in this region? What is one example of a major opportunity, project, or initiative that we can only accomplish if public entities work together and with private organizations across the region? • Demographics: These varied by respondent group, but generally included Zip Code, city or township, length of residence in the region, type of organization, and similar. Results Round 1 stakeholder contributions on the four surveys are currently being analyzed and results will be presented to the Partnership at the July 23 meeting and posted on the website. These will directly shape the next phase of Framework 2030, (Growth, Land Use, and Economic Analysis). Total responses are as shown below. • Employees (of public, private, nonprofit organizations): 553 • Community members: 707 + 430 employees who also contributed to embedded community survey = 1,137 • Organizations (private, nonprofit, public): 96 • Elected and appointed officials: 80 July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 9 Budget: The Partnership's fiscal year is the calendar year, but since the work is funded by Partners, the Joint Powers Agreement stipulates that the Partnership set its budget for the next year in July so that Partners have sufficient time to include those funds in their own budget processes. At the July 25, 2020 meeting the Partnership will review and adopt a revised 2020 budget and a 2021 workplan and budget. Framework 2030: The next phase (Growth, Land Use and Economic Analysis) began this month with the analysis of stakeholder contributions, and Round 2 engagement will start in late August or early September. We will continue inviting contributions via online surveys, and plan to hold some in-person engagements alongside scheduled meetings of Partners' elected and appointed bodies. Date: Name of elected body: Motion: Following the presentation of information about the Framework 2030 regional planning process and the opportunity to ask questions and/or provide feedback, we concur that we understand the work being done and have contributed to the project in a meaningful way. Action (mark with an X): Passed Failed July 2020 CMRP Update and Request for Resolution of Understanding Page 10 A ID W 4■ . «� .. 2 . �' � Iva � ' �� pGChfC n � � � ��� �- •�`_ f. 2% �.¥. -. - ,.. , IN %�I _ e rm&� Ik� z '�X - �«, 'Pe do �� � • \� �� �\ \ ,�� � /j Thur\ day, April 9, 2 020 Framework 2030 is an initiative of the Mwem P um %A% ow. ��.��. ..,.,%.. .,� ■v■■G&. &%A.. ... . %A.%. � �L r � . %_ To find out more about Framework 2030 Dlease visit: WW W.ncguui■dIPla n■■■■|gPartnership.org/ rd■n ework2O3O C - Introduction The following is a briefing from the conditions and trends research for Framework 2030 The analysis is organized around three topics: People, Prosperity, and Place Framework 2030 and COVID-19 These are challenging times for our communities and region. We are working diligently to meet our obligations while protecting everyone. Even as we act on critical current needs, we recognize the need to work together to plan the future. With significant growth and development projected for the region, the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership recently launched Framework 2030 -- a collaborative effort to develop our region's first-ever strategic land use and economic development plan. a - • LIJSt Claud Sherburne a n n n o n e x a °�t z z a140, �. • There are two research definition areas a based on the available data o'''''t°`'nt W Minneapolis Regional Planning Area (RPA) SHERBURN • Most of the available information is at the county level, UJ_ 5 d Dunes so the analyses below are for Wright and Sherburne Z seee counties. - Z Z • Focused Pla n n i n Area (FPA) s .., e.ee eigLak g a 5,I .e,«eek MonUJ 0 • When possible, analyses will focus on the jurisdictions that are members of the Central Mississippi River Larger rir ip at '� Regional Planning Partnership. -'end of presentation Regional Factbook Topics Coming soon... tAfi PEOPLE Demographic conditions and trends Key topics: • Population • Household size and makeup • Race and ethnicity • Age, health & wellness PROSPERITY Personal and economic vitality Key topics: • Economy & employment • Personal prosperity • Education & lifelong learning P LAC E Coming soon... Place -based conditions and trends Key topics: • Community character and development patterns • Land use and zoning • Mobility • Housing With additional topics added throughout the research and analysis ... E � KEY HIGHLIGHTS.,., • Significant population growth, but not evenly distributed across the region • Shrinking household size, but faster family formation and growth compared to state • Young for Minnesota, but aging faster tha the state's rate of change • Increasing racial and ethnic diversity, but still more white than the state g!. .11 tot ..PPOP �lot -i t POPULATION • Fastest growing region in Minnesota • 2nd and 3rd fastest growing counties, trail only Scott County (south metro) • The seven fastest growing counties in state surround the Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro Area • Population increase not evenly distributed across the region • Communities in the southeast of Wright and Sherburne Counties are growing the fastest me +71,573 Regional Pop. Change From 2000 to 2018, four times faster growth compared to the state 8=0 !rlrl &60 /U al Pen_ ChanaQ Vi Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 1: PEOPLE I Thursday, April 9, 2020FRA�r,r 2030 partnering for the future 1 ■ V 11 State Population Change by County (2010 - 2018) NUMBER 2&3 Fastest Growing Minnesota Counties Perriant -8.3 -8.3 -B.3 -8.1 -B.1 - -6.9 -6.9 -0, 5.1 fd -4.50 - 1.8 ■ -a - 4.8 4.8 - 8.7 08.7-14 Regional Population Change by Census Tract (2010 - 2018) 5.1% 5.4% 3.9% 1.7% 6.0% 1 Becker 5.1 Big Lake 3.7%° 11.5% 1.8°° Monticello 10.5% -0.5% 5.3°/ 2.5% 31. . 0 6.5% 10.3%. 15.8% . 2.9% 1 7.3% 15.9% 1.7% HOUSEHOLDS • Significant growth in households • Region added 26, 000 from 2000 to 2018 • 50% increase, 14% state, faster than population increase • Faster growth in family households • 30% increase in households with children under 18, decrease of 1% in the state • Households with a member over 65 — the fastest growing segment • 105% growth, 8,700 new households +25,973 New Households From 2000 to 2018, a 50% increase compared to 14% for the state Fastest Growing Household Types • +105% Households with one or more people 65+ +8,700 C2� • TO % Persons living alone +5,500 Households with children under 18 +6,000 AGE • Younger than the state, but aging faster • Regional median age, 36.2 years, Minnesota, 37.9 • 12% increase, four years from 2000 (2.5years increase Minnesota) • Significant growth in over -65 cohort • 13,000 more residents above retirement age • One in five residents over 65 • Younger cohorts growing slower me 36.2 Region's Median Age Increasing four years from 2000 • 1 in 5 Residents is over 65 Fastest growing cohort regionally (+100%), outpacing state (+40%) 20% Regional Aga Distribution 18% 2000-2018 16% ---- -- 14% +30% 12% Increase in residents under 34, +24,500 10% Compared to 5% for the State w 6% 4% 2% 0% - ------- 11r I 0 RPA, 2000 0 RPA, 2018 M ■M ■t ■M 0 to 5 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 to 19 State, 2000 ■M ■M 20 to 24 25 to 34 S M 35 to 44 +12900, Increase in resides over 65 --------------- --------------- 45 to 54 65 plus OF I DIVERSITY • Growth in share residents of color • From 3 to 6 % of overall population • More racially homogeneous than the state overall (83% white, 17% people of color) • Significant growth in Hispanic and Latinx community • Tripled from 2000, up 5,000 residents • 3% of overall population • Growth in residents born abroad • +250% increase from 2000 • Largest share from Latin America, fastest growing from Africa +260% Change in Hispanic & Latinx Population Increase of 5, 000 residents from 2000, +77% state Regional Race Distribution and Change M white 2000-2018 + 10, 000 +136% (Change in the number of residents of color) +1,900 Residents +170% +2,000 +250 +2,900 +220 0 Black or African American Some other race People of color Asian Two or more races 10111211: k VN Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 1: PEOPLE I Thursday, April 9, 20201 RAir,r OK 203`0 partnering for the future 1 r w I■ a Questions? . . Do you have questions about the findings ideas for future areas of research and analysis? Contact the planning team through email, r(=!aidnalplanningpartnership@gmail.com k Don't forget to share the presentation with your networks or anyone else you think would be interested. 0 Additional Information 20FRA1411L F 30 lyl , K partnering for the future W `i A little more about FRA • Our communities anticipate significant growth over the coming decades E There are many dynamic forces (internal ancF external) that may impact our quality of life, place, and opportunity We have an opportunity to act and take advantage of this time and energy 1. 203 0 Who's involved? Led by the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership • Cities of Becker, Big Lake, and Monticello; Becker, Silver Creek, Monticello, and Big Lake townships; and Sherburne and Wright counties • Coalition formed in 2016 focused on transportation issues • Partnerships evolving focus on regional challenges and opportunities 1% + Ifto . C l e a r L a z e T w n. Clear L — to Cie e n Ser Creek Twp. L I.". Mari a State Park AILJi Twp. Maple I/,1 . plee L 4 'nIGHT COUNTY Becker T LP Becker I -- S S h e r 6 u n e N a t i o n a l Wild life Ref u g e SHERBURNE COUNTY S a in d Dunes J C: �-ro _�. Tw,- I l Big Lake T \p. Big Lak Mohticello Regional Context St Cloud Sherburne County Montice!Ilo Twp ie tle Wright County )F I Minne P US t M chael Buffalo The Planning Area la Interstate City of Becker S US Highway City of Monticello State Highway City of Big Lake Participating 7ownsh1ps Park Land D Surrounding Counties Mississippi River Other Cities Open Water F F 2030 R Alyl 6.ARK partnering for the future IV NM 1 ■ The Project • Four components to the work plan What are the goals for the project? Through the planning project, the Partnership will work to: • Reach consensus on major 1. Preparation opportunities and choices that 2. Engagement benefit the region, and successfully collaborate to maximize benefit and 3. Analysis minimize risk; 4. Framework Development • Position Partners to be leaders and shape their own futures individually • Integrate the intuition of the public and and collectively, and; stakeholders with strong technical Support connectivity within the analysis region, and between the region and beyond. COMPONENT 1 Preparation Kick-off the project Develop a strategy for promoting the plan and motivating participation Create a plan for community engagement I Air'IFwnxr' COMPONENT 3 Technical Analysis Research key challenges and opportunities facing the region WQIT, UQ21A►IV) Community Engagement Think big about the future of the region and its communities Get the conversation started and think about our goals for the future Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 1: PEOPLE I Thursday, April 9, 2020 Affirm our goals and build actions for reaching our goals Identify priorities and implementation strategies 2030 FRAMITA `K partnering for the future 1 V How can you get involve • Access the project website www.RegionalPlanningPartnership.org// Framework2030 • On the website you can ... • Find out more about the project; • Share your ideas through a community survey, and; • Contact the planning team with any questions or idea 6 �t M1. di: JV"Ll IL AID UP W.* - 'i F -i- ��y �-yi •i }+ partnering r It to ITA r* Toind out more, ,lease visit:P ww.RegionalPlanningPartnersnIp.vrg, r{ r r 7- " *rig 6�� ork2030 J •y + 10 6�� ork2030 + 10 JL OP 6�� ork2030 AID IL W.*A - r partnerin IN 'kX# o 5 Thursday, April 16, 2020 Framework is an initiative of the �x'7 ff I�ea 5 R 9 , �# To find out more about Framework 2030, please visit: WWw.nuguuiidIPlan,,,,igPartnershlp.urg Fra,nework203O Introduction The following is a briefing from the conditions and trends research for Framework 2030 The analysis is organized around three topics: People, Prosperity, and Place Framework 2030 and COVID-19 These are challenging times for our communities and region. We are working diligently to meet our obligations while protecting everyone. Even as we act on critical current needs, we recognize the need to work together to plan the future. With significant growth and development projected for the region, the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership recently launched Framework 2030 -- a collaborative effort to develop our region's first-ever strategic land use and economic development plan. a • LIJSt Claud Sherburne a n n n o n e x a °�t z z a140, �. • There are two research definition areas a based on the available data o'''''t°`'nt W Minneapolis Regional Planning Area (RPA) SHERBURN • Most of the available information is at the county level, UJ_ d Dunes so the analyses below are for Wright and Sherburne � seee counties. Z Z siver creak Big LI elg yak • Focused Planning Area (FPA) a SI—Creek ul �_ QUJ Mont cello -[ • When possible, analyses will focus on the jurisdictions that are members of the Central Mississippi River Larger NTY -p at' 10 Regional Planning Partnership. -end of presentation Regional Factbook Topics 0 0 Itle Now ava'lable online PEOPLE Demographic conditions and trends Key topics: • Population • Household size and makeup • Race and ethnicity • Age, health & wellness PROSPERITY Personal and economic vitality Key topics: • Economy & employment • Personal prosperity • Education & lifelong learning Coming soon... P LAC E Place -based conditions and trends Key topics: • Community character and development patterns • Land use and zoning • Mobility • Housing With additional topics added throughout the research and analysis ... PROSPvRll I KEY HIGHL • Shifts in employment by industrial sector, overall growth in GDP, total jobs, and the number of business establishments • Most regional employees commute in from outside the region, and most regional residents commute to work outside • Higher levels of personal and family prosperity compared to the state; consistent levels of educational attainment ;r4 1 AN C PROSPERIT I ECONOMY EMPLOYMENT 4 • Regional GDP $8.2 billion in 2018 50%i Change in GDP 2010 to 2018 • $2.1 billion increase from 2010 • 2018: Number 12 and 13 ranked counties in terms of economic output in the state 40% • Over 10,500 jobs have been added since the recession or 2008/2009 • Regional job growth is outpacing household growth (Households measure the population divided by the number 30% of occupied housing units, i.e., families, roommates, etc.) • 7 of the top 10 regional employers are public entities 20% +36% I Change in Regional GDP $0 Billions Wright County County $3 $5 $8 TopRegional10 1 Elk River ISD* 1,445 Public School System 2 Buffalo -Hanover -Montrose ISD 782 Public School System 691364 ,ft 3 Wright County 763 County Government A Total Regional Jobs 4 St. Michael -Albertville ISD 725 Public School System Increase of 10, 500 from 2009 5 Xcel 700 Energy Production 6 Sherburne County 697 County Government Job Growth from 2009 7 Walmart 675 Retail O O �O �O s Big Lake ISD 649 Public School System 17 O 26 9 CentraCare Health 600 Hospitals/Clinics Sherburne County Wright County 10 Monticello ISD 576 Public School System *ISD: Independent School District **Reflecting full-time employment t G ED J Becker Aft Big Lake Elk River As Monticello � v 46 a Buffalo Albertville o' ° �. a • . o - o dp- - I Ilk '� _ °;; --f 14 • Major Jobs Clusters Regional Employment Clusters (2017) Where Region Residents Work(2017) P v 111 rte! W l o C �4 a I p ❑ 7,122 - 8,308 Jobs ❑ 5,935 - 7,121 Jobs, G ❑ 4,T48 - 5,934 Jobs ❑ 3,562 - 4,747 Jobs ❑ 2,375 - 3,561 Jobs ❑ 1,188 - 2,374 Jobs n v ❑1-1,1BT Jobs co Maple Ramsey k, Andover Blaine Plymouth q I Ros'evflle(r, T r— "i�linneapol"s St12- Loui Park , � m St. Paul 1 Edina ! s2 s5 Richfiel 5 J — --. - Prairiel Inve` Grove Bloomington Ea an I L s 1 s T C-:3 ED Woodbury I Arts, entertainment, Finance, insurance, real recreation, accommodation estate, and rental and and food services, 6.5% leasing, 6.5% Construction, 9.8% Manufacturing, 16.2% Wholesale trade, 3.8% Transportation and Agricu... warehousing, and utilities, forest... 5.6% fishing and huntin... Public and Professional, scientific, administration, mining, management, administrative, 3.2% 1.5% Educational, health and social and waste management services, Other services (except public services, 21.1% Retail trade, 11.5% 8.9% administration), 4.2% Information, 1.1% 30 Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 2 PROSPERITY I Thursday, April 16, 2020 FRAMEwnKR partnering for the future V V 11I I 50,000 An is a single 45,000 Number of Business Establishments(2008 - 2018) business,shment that may have any number of employees 40,000 35,000 Wright County ti 30,000 , cb ��o Ohh h��� h��1- �� h 1ti �ti ti tih � ti ti ti ti 25,000 20,000 ■ 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 50,000 X00 OO) Sherburne County oo ti� 3ti �o° 45,000 0 ��'� 0` 41 p� ,�'L to,' �� 40,000 ,y��oy �o��'` 1'y�O hyo, �,� ,�A '� 3 lip" 3 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 2008 2009 2010 2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 PROSRrR-I I ECONOMY & E • Growing sectors of the economy (as measured by the number of business establishments) will require different building forms • Some construction businesses may have been 01 1 WIN . 11 replaced by self-employed workers b • Professional and financial services may be underreported due to self-employment A Change in the Number of Establishments by Sector(2008 - 2018) Sherburne Establishment Change Wright Establishment Change -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 -50 0 50 100 150 Natural Resources and Mining Natural Resources and Mining Construction Construction - . 10 -Year Change � 10 -Year Manufacturing Manufacturing Trade, Transportation and Utilities Trade, Transportation and Utilities Information Information Financial Activities Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Professional and Business Services Education and Health Services Education and Health Services Leisure and Hospitality Leisure and Hospitality Other Services Other Services Public Administration Public Administration 4 Change 20C I ECONOMY& EMPLOYMENT • Most regional employees commute in from outside the region, and most regional residents commute to work outside • Job growth particularly in Sherburne has been fueled largely by workers from outside the county • Average commute time N30 minutes one way, 10 minutes higher than state average Sherburne Count • Workers gommuting into Wright County r -sidents ho also irk in th ;ounty 1,394 Bij Lake 17,922 4 Residents who commute outsidb,the,- county for work '.. 5r61G e .- * Elk Rice , o, 45,545 Maple c PROSPER -11 I PERSONAL PROSPERITY • Regional median household income $15,000 higher than the state • 50% increase from 2000, outpacing the state's growth, 45% • Rates of poverty lower than the state average • Higher rates of home ownership (82%) compared to the state 63% • 40% of renters pay more than 35% of income for rent, i.e., they are cost -burdened 11 x83,850 Median Household Income 45' Distribution of Individual Income 40% 2018 35% 30% 0 0 25% Change in Median 20' Household Income 15% From 2000 to 2018, increase from $55k to $84k 10% 5% 0% 0 Regional Planning Area State Less than $14,999 $15,000-24,999 $25000-34999 $35,000-49,999 $50,000-74,999 $75,000-99,999 $100,000+ PROSPrR-I' LIFELONG LEARNING 35% Regional Educational Attainment • Levels of educational attainment 2018 30% reflective of state averages 25% • Slightly lower percentage of college degrees 20% • High HS graduation rates >90% 0 � • 6/ of UM -Twin Cities students from the Region 15% RPA State • Slightly lower preschool enrollment 5% • 6% under thea e of 3, 7%state o 1 g o, Less than 9th to High Some Associate Bachelor's Graduate 9th grade 12th grade, school college, no degree degree or no diploma graduate degree professional (includes degree equivalency) D a 01 F1 ' k '�rl.A+��• o Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 2 PROSPERITY I Thursday, April 16, 2020 1 RAMFwnP`K partnering for the future 1 r w I ■ Additional Information 20FRA1411L F 30 lyl , K partnering for the future W `i A little more about FRA • Our communities anticipate significant growth over the coming decades E imft• There are many dynamic forces (internal and- P, that may impact our quality of life., � place, and opportunity • We have an opportunity to act and take advantage of this time and energy � 203 Who's involved? Led by the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership • Cities of Becker, Big Lake, and Monticello; Becker, Silver Creek, Monticello, and Big Lake townships; and Sherburne and Wright counties • Coalition formed in 2016 focused on transportation issues • Partnerships evolving focus on regional challenges and opportunities 1% + Ifto . C l e a r L a z e T w n. Clear L — to Cie e n Ser Creek Twp. L I.". Mari a State Park AILl ion Twp. Maple I/,1 . plee L 4 'nIGHT COUNTY Becker T LP Becker I -- S S h e r 6 u n e N a t i o n a l Wild life Ref u g e SHERBURNE COUNTY S a in d Dunes J C: �-ro _�. Tw,- I l Big Lake T \p. Big Lak Mohticello Regional Context St Cloud Sherburne County Montice!Ilo Twp ie tle Wright County )F I Minne P US t M chael Buffalo The Planning Area la Interstate City of Becker S US Highway City oFMonticello State Highway City of Big Lake Participating 7ownsh1ps Park Land D Surrounding Counties Mississippi River Other Cities Open Water F F 2030 R A1V1 6.ARK partnering for the future IV NM 1 ■ The Project • Four components to the work plan What are the goals for the project? Through the planning project, the Partnership will work to: • Reach consensus on major 1. Preparation opportunities and choices that 2. Engagement benefit the region, and successfully collaborate to maximize benefit and 3. Analysis minimize risk; 4. Framework Development • Position Partners to be leaders and shape their own futures individually • Integrate the intuition of the public and and collectively, and; stakeholders with strong technical Support connectivity within the analysis region, and between the region and beyond. COMPONENT 1 Preparation Kick-off the project Develop a strategy for promoting the plan and motivating participation Create a plan for community engagement I Air'IFwnxr' COMPONENT 3 Technical Analysis Research key challenges and opportunities facing the region WQIT, UQ21A►IV) Community Engagement Think big about the future of the region and its communities Get the conversation started and think about our goals for the future Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 2 PROSPERITY I Thursday, April 16, 2020 Affirm our goals and build actions for reaching our goals Identify priorities and implementation strategies 2030 FRAMFwnR`K partnering for the future 1 ■ to How can you ge involv'' s a • Access the project website www.ReqionatPtanningPartnership.org/ Framework2030 s` • On the website you can ... h_ • Find out more about the project; •Share your ideas through a community survey, and; • Contact the planning team with any questions or idea A■ %. ® • �� ` . %• . . • � a �a UP .■ . , W 4■ -lip - � �.. �� ��� � ■ « �' � � � � �- *� _ f• . % �.1� \�� � - ¥ z �X - « partnering WW to I t I TA To find o n t m o red please visit, e ionalPlanningPartnership.org/pt jefts7F . -t 10, -- 0.4f-,. ,� � . � ewo r k 2 0 3 O - A ID W 4■ . ' 2 . Iva � ' �� pGChfn h � � � ��� �- •�`_ f. 2% �.¥. IN � � a ��- �� 'Pe do � • ,�� �\ w � �.4 � 2. ■ . f . 2`�. �� - �� 'Pe do �� � \� �� \ • ,�� �\ � �.4 /j ' - � . 4r� . � ■ � � � �. a '0 /\ ) Ad ,el � Pr Thursday, April 23, 2020 Framework 2030 is an initiative of the ..S.5%A%IN .,.,�. .,c ,■■&. &.mm . GAN � � , -- vG�. .- - -air �L r � . V - To find out more about Framework 2030 Dlease visit: WW W.ncguui■dIPla n■■■■|gPartn ers hip.urg/rd■|■ework2O3O C - Introduction The following is a briefing from the conditions and trends research for Framework 2030 The analysis is organized around three topics: People, Prosperity, and Place Framework 2030 and COVID-19 These are challenging times for our communities and region. We are working diligently to meet our obligations while protecting everyone. Even as we act on critical current needs, we recognize the need to work together to plan the future. With significant growth and development projected for the region, the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership recently launched Framework 2030 -- a collaborative effort to develop our region's first-ever strategic land use and economic development plan. a - • LIJ St Cloud Plann inga :�hrbu��,°�t z a is There are two research definition a areas based on the available data o Wright County W Minneapolis • Regional Planning Area (RPA)_- Wiltllife Retuge SHERBURN is Most of the available information is at the county level, UJ,.. so the analyses below are for Wright and Sherburne a - a�� °e= counties. Z � eee Z • Focused PlanningZ <r..k B1gLak Area e Big Lak Si_Jreek • When possible, analyses will focus on the jurisdictions W that are members of the Central Mississippi River pp Larger NTma Y p at OU Regional Planning Partnership. 'L ­'end of presentation Regional Factbook Topics • Now available Now available online online PFnPLF Demographic conditions and trends Key topics: • Population • Household size and makeup • Race and ethnicity • Age, health & wellness PROSPERITY Personal and economic vitality Key topics: • Economy & employment • Personal prosperity • Education & lifelong learning P LAC E Place -based conditions and trends Key topics: • Community character and development patterns • Land use and zoning • Mobility • Housing With additional topics added throughout the research and analysis ... KEY HIGHLIGHTS • Large Focused Planning Area (FPA) - twice the size of Minneapolis & St. Paul combined • Range of places from urban to rural • Regional, multi -modal connectivity including bike trails and rail • Majority of housing between 10-30 years old, predominantly of a single type A& COMMUNITY CHARACTER • Focused Planning Area (FPA) has diverse characters and distinct places • Three cities and four townships, each with a unique 201 Sq.Mmim characterand defining places • Character Map describes the types of built Focused Planning Area Almost twice the size of the cities of and natural environments in the FPA Minneapolis & St. Paul combined • Character areas are defined by areas of similar activity, style, and physical organization • Richer character types are defined within categories, such as a natural area vs. a public park Character M�ap 0 L a k e M a r i a State Park Silver Creek Twp. WRIGHT COUNTY Becker Twp. 4 . 0 0 0 . . . 0 • • • • 0 SHERBURNE COUNTY M o n t i c e l l o T w p. B i g Lake Twp . . • Rural MA Land near the edge of a community or in unincorporated areas that are primarily large - lot residential or in agricultural use. Public and private parks, recreational open space, or undeveloped natural areas that are permanently protected from development by the city, state, county, or some other authority. 10 • , .. • • Residential Development areas composed primarily of neighborhoods with a mixture of housing \ options for the community. Larger maps available at the end of presentation Characterimillp .• io Becker Twp. .• lk"N .• SHERBURNE COUNTY • • • • • • Big Lake Twp. • • • • Lake Maria zs tate Park 10 S i l v e r C r e e k T w p. • WRIGHT COUNTY •' Monti c e l l o Twp. Commercial Development areas including a wide range of retail and service uses located along major corridors, in small neighborhood nodes, and as part of regional destinations. Znstitutira Land and buildings used by public agencies, churches, hospitals, libraries, airports, public and private schools, public safety facilities, and other similar institutions. Employment centers containing both large, single use office sites and small, neighborhood scale office buildings with minor integration of commercial or light / limited industrial uses. Larger maps available at the end of presentation Character SHERBURNE COUNTY i . Industrial Areas designated to accommodate an array of operations from low -impact clean uses such as assembly, processing, and manufacturing and larger, intense operations including factories and plants. Small nodes of mixed-use development that provide employment opportunities and goods and services within walking distance to surrounding neighborhoods. Larger maps available at the end of presentation LAND USE ZONING • Land use is expressed in two ways in communities: • The Existing Land Use -How the property is being used today • The Planned Future Land Use -the expected or encouraged future use of that property (they maybe the same) • Zoning is legally defined use of property • City, township, and county can have different zoning districts • Properties may not conform to the underlying zoning for a number of reasons (pre -date the code, variance, etc.) ~ 3 3% Agricultural Land Use Both today and planned for the future is Land Use Classifications Existing Land Use Map L Agricultural to i Becker Twp. mLL� s Open Space/ Parks 5 a n d Residential (Low Density) Residential (Med Density) SHERBURNE COUNTY F Residential (High Density) B i g L a k e T p. Office / Business School Institutional Lake Maria zs Public -Owned tate Park to � � y Silver Creek Twp . � , � Commercial a Industrial WRIGHT COUNTY Note: Existing Land 25 Use represents what X M o n t i c e l l o T w p., activity exists on the _ _ property today �o Becker Twp JLake Maria III tate Park A i Iver Creek Twp. WRIGHT COUNTY Future Land Use Map SHERBURNE COUNTY M o n t i c e l l o T w p. Big Lake Twp. Note: Future Land Use is the activity that is expected or encouraged on the property in the future r i r Agricultural Open Space / Parks Residential (Low Density) Residential (Med Density) Residential (Lakeshore) Business / Industry Institutional Public -Owned Commercial Town Center Transit -Oriented Dev. Mixed -Use / Growth Industrial Heavy Industrial GLACE I MOBILITY Robust regional bike & trail network • Local trail network extends hundreds of miles with direct links to national routes like the Mississippi River Trail Direct rail access for people and freight • Northstar commuter line connects region to downtown Minneapolis • BNSF freight line provides connection to major cities across the nation Focused Planning Area sits at a major crossroads • 1-94, US 10 and MN Highway 25 intersect within the FPA 39,000 Average Vehicles Cross over the MN Highway 25 bridge daily 46,500 Average Vehicles Travel daily on this segment of 1-94 /� Sherbu ne National ,A' Spokane, YY/'"'► Wildlife Refuge 1366 miles - - - R 0 SHERBURNE COUNTY ea L�kB / -- Becker Twp . --.Zim mean n - J Sand) Dunes min. to �St. o Becker /L-n�w 1 lfi9i B i g Lake T w p. Big Lak 5 iIv r Creek TwP- — I SS tatt te Park \ ss Monticello \� I 15 i i M/ntice110 p WRIGHT COUNTY 55 C+ d J T':� Buffalo _ -ft 45 min. to` Minneapolis t M�chael / Elk Rive C icago, IL 4 2 mil s Regional Contecc Regional Connectivity • FPA contains one river crossing — Highway 25 Each community is connected by at least one major roadway (1-94, US 10, MN Highway 25) • Wnw!"I'm 00 Safe Routes to School Cities of Becker, Big Lake, and Monticello have plans in place A& HOUSING 'Ad • Majority of housing built between 1990-2010 in Regional Planning Area (RPA) $2211400 • N30% of homes built between 2000-2009, RPA Median Home Value N5% built after 2010 Slightly higher than the state, $211,800 • 80% of total units are single-family homes Median: Midpoint of all values, with half above and half below • Most units are owner -occupied • Over 80% of units are owner -occupied with very low vacancy rates (<1Y.) Age of Housing Stock(Regional Planning Area, 2018) Sherburne Wright 51% 1 1 I State Homes built between I I 1990 & 2009 1 Compared to 27% for the State 1 1 . 1 � � I 1 � � I 1 1 I ■■ ■ - W■■ ■■ Built 1939 Built 1940 Built 1950 Built 1960 Built 1970 Built 1980 Built 1990 Built 2000 Built 2010 Built 2014 or earlier to 1949 to 1959 to 1969 to 1979 to 1989 to 1999 to 2009 to 2013 or later 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% II:XIj M ■ [1 1 Single Family Detached 67,253 Units 80% (of all housing units) Other —�—� 17, 523 Units 20% Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 3: PLACE I Thursday, April 23, 2020 10 to 19 units, 2% 2 to 9 units, 2% 20 or more units, 6% 1 -unit, attached, 7% Manuf. Home, 3% 2030 FRAM.wIII RK partnering for the future V V 11I I REAL ESTATE • Home values slow to recover following 2008 National Recession • "Double dip"' decrease in home values and median sales price with trough in 2012, $138k median sale prices (24% decrease from 2008) • RPA averaged a 7% increase in median sales price each year after trough in 2012 • Consistent with the growth average for the seven -county region (Hennepin, Anoka, Ramsey, Dakota, Scott, Sherburne, and Wright Counties) +$104K Change in Median Sales Price (2012 - 2019) $350,000 Median Home Value(1996 - 2020) $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 � Wright County � Sherburne County $100,000 Seven County Region National Recession $50,000 o°° o°° O°° o°` o°` o°` o°` o°` O°` o°° o°° o°° Ok Ok o°` o°` Q° Ok o°` Ok Q° Ok O k O°` 006 001 ��� 000 000, OOti OOti 003 00�` 006 006 001 00`b 000 01ti 01R Otih O,y6 011 0ti6 O,0• 1 1 ti 1 ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti 1 ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti Questions? • Do you have questions about the findings or ideas for future areas of 40 research and analysis? Contact the planning team through email, " regionalplanningpartnership a@gmail.com Don't forget to share the presentatio with your networks or anyone else yo think would be interested. low Becker Twp. Kqq1r.1r.1v1v4M&TVJL Rural Open Space Residential Commercial Institutional Employment ■ Industrial Town Center FF 2030 R A IT16.-.WOPK purtnerrng forthe future I r V h I■ Big Lake Twp. �•� �r:r�a•��a �■ U, Rural Open Space Residential Commercial Institutional Employment ■ Industrial Town Center FRAR11, � 2030 1v1hi--.-W0PK l artnering for the futureN It I ■ Monticello Twp. FF 2030 R A IT16.-.WOPK purtnerrng forthe future I r V h I■ r.1KU4..y,.1�.� Rural Open Space Residential Commercial Institutional Employment ■ Industrial Town Center FF 2030 R A IT16.-.WOPK purtnerrng forthe future I r V h I■ 10 Silver Creek Twp. L a k e M a r i a State Park 39 WRIGHT COUNTY SHERBURNE COUNTY Be c k e r T w p. M on t i c e l l o T w p. �� 39 Silver Creek Twp. Character Types Rural Open Space Residential Commercial Institutional Employment ■ Industrial Town Center F R A 2030 rr� .WOOK l partnering for the futureN It I ■ Additional Information 20FRA1411L F 30 lyl , K partnering for the future W `i A little more about FRA 2030 41 Our communities anticipate significad growth over the coming decades There are many dynamic forces E' IM ht,0 imft• M. (internal and external) that may impact our quality of life, place, and opportunity • We have an opportunity to act and to advantage of this time and energy 0 Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 3: PLACE I Thursday, April 23, 2020FRAMr R``K partnering for the future 1 r w I■ a C l e a r L a z e T w n. Clear L — to Cie e n Ser Creek Twp. L I.". Mari a State Park AILl ion Twp. Maple I/,1 . plee L 4 'nIGHT COUNTY Becker T LP Becker I -- S S h e r 6 u n e N a t i o n a l Wild life Ref u g e SHERBURNE COUNTY S a in d Dunes J C: �-ro _�. Tw,- I l Big Lake T \p. Big Lak Mohticello Regional Context St Cloud Sherburne County Montice!Ilo Twp ie tle Wright County )F I Minne P US t M chael Buffalo The Planning Area la Interstate City of Becker S US Highway City oFMonticello State Highway City of Big Lake Participating 7ownsh1ps Park Land D Surrounding Counties Mississippi River Other Cities Open Water F F 2030 R A1V1 6.ARK partnering for the future IV NM 1 ■ The Project • Four components to the work plan What are the goals for the project? Through the planning project, the Partnership will work to: • Reach consensus on major 1. Preparation opportunities and choices that 2. Engagement benefit the region, and successfully collaborate to maximize benefit and 3. Analysis minimize risk; 4. Framework Development • Position Partners to be leaders and shape their own futures individually • Integrate the intuition of the public and collectively, and; and stakeholders with strong Support connectivity within the technical analysis region, and between the region and beyond. COMPONENT 1 Preparation Kick-off the project Develop a strategy for promoting the plan and motivating participation Create a plan for community engagement I Air'IFwnxr' COMPONENT 3 Technical Analysis Research key challenges and opportunities facing the region WQIT, UQ21A►IV) Community Engagement Think big about the future of the region and its communities Get the conversation started and think about our goals for the future Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 3: PLACE I Thursday, April 23, 2020 Affirm our goals and build actions for reaching our goals Identify priorities and implementation strategies 2030 FRAMITA `K partnering for the future 1 V How can you geti*nvo • Access the project website www.Regional V IanningPartnership.or 1;ramawnrk7n-,%n • On the website you can ... • Find out more about the project; • Share your ideas through a community survey, and; • Contact the planning team with any questions or idea d IL AID UP W.* - 'i F -i- ��y �-yi •i }+ partnering r It to ITA r* Toind out more, ,lease visit:P ww.RegionalPlanningPartnersnIp.vrg, r{ r r 7- " *rig 6�� ork2030 J •y + 10 6�� ork2030 + 10 JL OP 6�� ork2030 A ID W4■ - l� 2 . A Iva partnie h � � ��� �- •�`_ f. 2% �.¥. IN � � a T h u r s'a'ay M a y 28, 2020 Ir do • \\ /j wax . . Framework 2030 is an initiative Of the .. a.....��.��. ....,�. ..� ,v■,g�. .�....... . �.�n � �L r � . %_ TO find out more about Framework 2030 lease visit: wwyv. Ke g|-u■■d | P l a n ■■| n g Pd rt n e rs h i p. u rg / rd ■I■ e wo r k 2 O 3 O � 11-V 7 -4%L. C Introduction The following is a briefing from the conditions and trends research for Framework 2030 This presentation is part of a "deep dive" series that will focus on the regional market, interdependence, and land use and growth Framework 2030 and COVID-19 These are challenging times for our communities and region. We are working diligently to meet our obligations while protecting everyone. Even as we act on critical current needs, we recognize the need to work together to plan the future. With significant growth and development projected for the region, the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership recently launched Framework 2030 -- a collaborative effort to develop our region's first-ever strategic land use and economic development plan. a W Planning Context a Z E Z 4 =of • There are two research definition areasCL a based on the available data o W • Regional Planning Area (RPA) • Most of the available information is at the county level, LU so the analyses below are for Wright and Sherburne counties. z • Z Focused Planning Area (FPA) MMI CL • When possible, analyses will focus on the jurisdictions W that are members of the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership. L& St Cloud :3herburne County Wright County Minneapolis SHERBURN -'end of presentation fps -a �- x�� o �` i 1�• i FN Deing�nMarket The market area can be different than the geography, and typically varies for types of activities such as work, events, and certain types of shopping and dining Three ways of determining geographic market area: • Commuting • Distance/drive-times • Cell phone location data 1 oLv � Impact of COVID-19 Understanding the geographic scope of the market area will be useful as you begin the process of economic recovery and contemplate key gateways, marketing efforts, and potential new development opportunities C lear La4e Tw n. Clear L — to Ser Creek Two, L I.". Mari a State Park AILl lon Twp. Maple I/,1 . piee L 4 'nIGHT COUNTY Becker Tw LP Becker I S h e r 6 u n e N a t i o n a l Wild life Ref u g e SHERBURNE COUNTY i -=mm - n S a n d Dunes J l I Big Lake T \p. Big Lak E11, E: . ir T�.-�', Elk Rive Monticello Regional Context St Cloud ZS ,� Sherburne County Montice!Ilo Twp ie tville Wright County )F I [� Minne P US t M chael Buffalo Focused Planning Area 0 Participating Townships 0 Surrounding Counties Other Cities Park Land Mississippi River Open Water city of Becker City of Monticello City of Big Lake interstate to US Highway as State Highway F R F 2030 1V1.RK partnering for the future I r V It I ■ MARKET AREA I Commuter Shed • Most regional employees commute in from outside the region, and most regional residents commute to work outside • Job growth particularly in Sherburne has been fueled largely by workers from outside the county Average commute time minutes minutes higher than state average The arrows do not indicate direction of movement Sherburne County Residents who Workers commuting into the county z Becker 4 4 _{ Wright County commute outsidtPIWal Residents county for work who also 35,612 work in the county 8,39 , t Big Lake � Elk Rice 45,545 ED J G w� ° t�eE ° Becker Big Lake - Elk River -� M n i Ilo o t ce P ° Buffalo R e - Albertville dIlkp- I '� _ °;; ��°4 • Major Jobs Clusters Regional Employment Clusters (207) Where Region Residents Work(2017) O a ., tD g„r�f 0 C I p ❑ 7,122 - 8,398 Jobs ❑ 5,935 - 7,121 Jobs , G ❑ 4,748 - 5,934 Jobs ❑ 3,562 - 4,747 Jobs ❑ 2,375 - 3,561 Jobs ❑ 1,188 - 2,374 Jobs n ❑ 1 - 1,187 Jobs ca 0 Maple Ramsey k, Andover Blaine Plymouth q I Ras�euflle(r W< ,b 12 280 r— "i�linneapoGs St ZPI-ark � m St. Paul 1 Edina ! s2 s5 Richfiel 5 J — --. - Prairiel Inve` Grove Bloomington Ea an I L s 1 s N a to T C-:3 ED Woodbury I MARKET ARE" � Distance vs. Drivemtime • Distance: Measured as the radius from a point • Drive -time: Based on a algorithm embedded i mapping software from the point`' - • No rules of thumb exist on right measures or scales • Both approaches have tradeoffs • Analysis depends on what you want to know and why -- • This analysis uses the Watmart address in Monticello because of the typical geographic reach of those stores �* '•3'^' '` � 4. .�..� n+r ����.1w �Yr�- 4 ■ w� ,.dF,: ,.� �ti. -! iJM: :�,� i�,ef� m t ' dW •o .. .... ,111L � .. j $yN � {:. I 1 .5. is ; .. � .i': :} .Y y w � �—b 3" .L• � � .%. rimy r • r+ y it -} � ..' .-.•�-rr � _ T- 'rte ��'- .0 �fk:ti � � p" adz` t - 'Tr. - JIF Am City � i � '� JIB .;JM.. �� • ' � . r _ 1 .. '1•I I1• 1fff Monticello s Y •�Qj INTERSTATE - i► 94= `* ,. 40v, Ww Y j�Y, �Ye • } -µ7 y +_. , .,F S .rr"r •rry �'.Y1��` 30 Regional Factbook Briefings VOL 4: MARKET I Thursday May 28, 2020 FRAMiFWnRK partnering for the future 1 r to h I r �s � "P° _ r�.-?Q,7tl1.� -.f � i'�I � � Fs �: •sI.3F.3fY-i?�IR"S�F i� •jY { � Y - A `' A It 2 miles 55 Iry MARKET AREA Y+� 2 -mile Sales Capacity :p Surplus in retail & restaurant sales beyond what the population two miles away can support based on its income capacity 5 -mile Sales Capacity 5 miles ��.�_ = 0 = M Surplus in retail & restaurant sales 6 10 miles than the population five miles away Source: NP calculations based on ESRI datasets I i \ • ,p�f 1 Vdf a n— — 2 3 h � � 1 iii.-.. bUft r.iY 15 min �4 anrr ps3r3SW -Cut 1 I VA , I ',',I Elff, 4 1 Drive Time 10 -minute Sales Capacity Surplus of retail & restaurant sales beyond what the 10 -minute drive time population can support Source: NP calculations based on ESRI datasets So What? • No individual community within the planning area has enough population or income to sustain the present level of economic activity on its own • The restaurant and retail base depends on the economic health and viability the broader region f rr, l lap' 10 ter. , ;_. 4 t x pi MAL" --t Ri Cell Phone Location Data • Geolocation data gathering process • Based on pings to cell towers • Data is anonymous and not downloadable • Source used (UberMedia) allows for tracking across days, time of day, number of visits, location two hours before arriving • Planning team simplified the requests for this exercise, M explained for each exhibit Walmart • This anal sis uses the Walmart address in Used as point of y reference for Monticello because of the typical geographic analysis reach of those stores )any sarCell Sauk Rapid;:, St JOSWp C#I-ud gv Cold Spring �n Valley Monticello Fo e G� D'..."Im Pricceton Becker lea{ater 74 Sherburne National _ FOCUSED PLANNING AREA �ieru e Big Lake 9 Cambridge Isar%li _ High concentration of visitors from this area Elk River Ann iMa ie Buffalo Itchfield �D Dassel Albertville �x LEGEND 1 visit Up to 100 visits Coon Rapids lu Maple Grove " Minneapolis MARKET AREA Geolocati*on Map shows any visitor at least once over the course of one to the designated location (Monticello Walmart) The red spots show the starting locations for visitors Source: NP calculations based on ESRI datasets Parent Sartell �4� Brickton MARKET AREA Sauk Rapids DuOm Princeton S1 Cloud as Santiago Cable Briggs Lake herburne ake W tional �a FOCUSED PLANNING AREA St Augusta Clear -Lak= Zimmerman CIe2: -,eater 04 L ake Elk River Fai rhauen ilver Creek ,ello South Haven �. Annandale ss Map' ' ake LEGEND 1 visit Up to 100 visits Albert of e S. r, F ,jet W"'D Geolocati*on Bradfard Dxlip Crown G} St Francis f Now then Dak Gr-0VQ Ra mseyr is Andav Anaka Rogers Coon Rap This map shows any visitor at least once over the course of one month (randomly selected June 1 to July 12019) to the designated location (Walmart) Residents and workers in Partnership communities are important sources of trip generation Source: NP calculations based on ESRI datasets snernurne .-, MARKET Akr. � Optimal Market Geospace • This map shows the "optimal geospace" – or the regional market area – based on a proprietary algorithm that looks at distribution and location generation of most visitors CIe (B Ann -arida I-@ • It clearly indicates that the Partnership communities are critical sources of trip generation (and potential customers) to designated location A;ato Source: NP data request Vista by UberMedia 9, 4V 0 T,jgnn t irLiml I i E'uFfalf —. ss E IIS Fri ver r,rA.1 OOf I -VI apse U I UWP 1� Conclusions While a substantial number of the region's residents work in neighboring counties, and a substantial number of local workers come into the region from outside of it, the retail and restaurant sectors depend on the region's Ing residents for their viability. If growing the amenity base (and tax base) is desired, it will require thinking about the size of the geographic market, connectivity across the to market, and the economic wellbeing of the resident population. Natinnal 47 MARKET AREA Optimal Market Geospace ove M Additional Information 20FRA1411L F 30 lyl , K partnering for the future W `i A little more about FRA Our communities anticipate significant growth the coming decades E There are many dynamic forces (internal and externarl that may impact our quality of life, place, and opportunity We have an opportunity to act and take advantage of this time and energy �9& 203 a 0 Ived .7 Who's invo Led by the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership • Cities of Becker, Big Lake, and Monticello; Becker, Silver Creek, Monticello, and Big Lake townships; and Sherburne and Wright counties • Coalition formed in 2016 focused on transportation issues • Partnership's evolving focus on regional challenges and opportunities .V C l e a r L a z e T w n. Clear L — 10 F1 Becker T r� \ Becker S h e r 6 u n e N a t i o n a l Wild life Ref u g e SHERBURNE COUNTY Z-�mm - n S a n d Dunes J rC J Big Lake TW Ell, P, T:�f Big Lak 1 za _ \ Elk Rive Silver Creek Two, L a k e Maria State Pa r \ 2s o r I r n a T w p. Monticello Regional Context St Cloud 2s ,�� Sherburne County AIL, or Twp. Maple I Monticello Twp. pie L e / 1 G H T COUNTY e tville WrghtCounty ss gu ffaIo Twp. Minnie ,p,US Buffalo t M chael \ The Planning Area IV Interstate City of Becker to us Highway City of Monticello zOs State Highway City of Big Lake Participating 7ownsh1ps Park Land D Surrounding Counties r Mississippi River Other Cities Open Water F R F 2030 1V1. A RK partnering for the future I r V It I ■ The Project • Four components to the work plan What are the goals for the project? Through the planning project, the Partnership will work to: • Reach consensus on major 1. Preparation opportunities and choices that 2. Engagement benefit the region, and successfully 3. Analysis collaborate to maximize benefit and 4. Framework Development minimize risk; • Position Partners to be leaders and • Integrate the intuition of the public and shape their own futures individually stakeholders with strong technical analysis and collectively, and; • Support connectivity within the region, and between the region and beyond. COMPON ENT 1 Preparation Kick-off the project Develop a strategy for promoting the plan and motivating participation Create a plan for community engagement !1i 1 COMPONENT 3 Technical Analysis Research key challenges and opportunities facing the region MEMO] 91A01 W� Community Engagement Think big about the future of the region and its communities Get the conversation started and think about our goals for the future Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 2 PROSPERITY I Thursday April 16, 2020 Affirm our goals and build actions for reaching our goals Identify priorities and implementation strategies � 2030 FRAir�FW�RK partnering for the(uture 1 ■ V 111 How canYou get involve • Access the project website www. Reg ionalPlanning Partnership. Fra mework2030 • On the website you can ... • Find out more about the project; • Share your ideas through a community survey, and; • Contact the planning team with any questions or idea �_ a A■ %. ® • �� ` . %• . . • � a �a UP .■ . , W 4■ -lip - � �.. �� ��� � ■ « �' � � fp � � �- *� _ f• . % �.1� \�� - ¥ z �X - « partnering WW to I t I TA To find o u t more, please visit.. � e | t s. , nalPlanningPartnership.org/piujuc � ewo r k 2 0 3 O - � - �� . 2 .- � ewo r k 2 0 3 O - A ID W4■ - l� 2 . A Iva partnie h � � ��� �- •�`_ f. 2% �.¥. IN �S'� - � � a ■ 1pe do �� � • \� �� �\ \ ,�� � �.4 /j wax . . T h u r sMy June 2 5, 2020 Framework 2030 is an initiative Of the a......# .#..p .p.lo lo....,%...Lw- A,vP,CIL . %"ssss...v, . ".%. � �L r � . %_ TO find out more about Framework 2030 lease visit: wwyv. Ke g|-u■■d | P l a n ■■| n g Pd rt n e rs h i p. u rg / rd ■I■ e wo r k 2 O 3 O � 11-V 7 -4%L. C Introduction The following is a briefing from the conditions and trends research for Framework 2030 This presentation is part of a "deep dive" series focusing on the regional market, economic performance, and land use and growth Framework 2030 and COVID-19 These are challenging times for our communities and region. We are working diligently to meet our obligations while protecting everyone. Even as we act on critical current needs, we recognize the need to work together to plan the future. With significant growth and development projected for the region, the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership recently launched Framework 2030 -- a collaborative effort to develop our region's first-ever strategic land use and economic development plan. CIedr La-.�e Twn. I i Clear L 10 e n �l Ser Creek Twp. Lake ..ria State Park H.IC for Tw p. luaple I/./<�r"vI — pie L I e T / SIGHT COUNTYI 55 Becker Tw L LP Becker I ; S h e r 6 u In e N a t i o n a l Wild life Ref u g e SHERBURNE CO NTY In -. — S a n d e D u n e s — T. I J Big Lake T \p. Big Lak E I I F.' .1 c r Tw r, Elk Rive WOM Monticello � I ky-\ _Lj Regional Planning Area St Cloud ZS Sherburne County Montice!Ilo Twp e tville NrightCo ii B u f f a l o T w p- Minneapolis t BuffalM chael os Focused Planning Area *Sometimes abbreviated to FPA in the briefing 0 Participating Townships 0 Surrounding Counties Other Cities Park Land Mississippi River Open Water city of Becker City of Monticello City of Big Lake interstate to US Highway as State Highway FR -� F 2030 llyfl.-INAPK partnering for the future I r V 11 I ■ w. AX .71 - .-*•`. _.. :ia.w Q0.'-.. • .-."!" ,A.- . ropera ue na - _ S _ .tib � ^ h ►r • The planning team examined property values from Minnesota interactive property tax database `r JK • Data available from 2017 thru 2019 r } • Why analyze property values? r J� • Property value performance can be an indicator of investor, interest and economic activity•-- • There are references throughout to the Focused` 4 ,f` ManningArea (FPA), please see the previous page for a � ,w a map Rr, PROPERTY VALUE I TOTAL EST. MARKET VALUE $4. 1 9s 2017 REGIONAL PROPERTY VALUE $4.54s 2018 $4.86g 2019 Total regional property value +16°io Increase in total estimated property market value across the region, 2017-2019 PROPERTY VALUE I GROWTH RATES PERCENT CHANGE PROPERTY VALUES, 2017-19 25% 21% Two community's property 20% 17% values are growing faster 0 16% than the region: Big Lake, 13/ 15% 15/0 14% 15 0 0 14% Monticello 12% 12% 10% Property values in the Focused Planning Area are 5% growing faster than the two counties as a whole 0% Becker Becker Big Lake Big Lake Monticello Monticello Silver REGION Sherburne Wright TWP TWP TWP Creek PROPERTY VALUE I COMPARISON ACROSS CLASSES COMPARISON OF GROWTH RATES ACROSS CLASSES 2017-19 Residential Homestead Total Residential Total Regional Property Value Residential Land Industrial Residential Non -Homestead Total Commercial Agricultural Commercial Land - 3% s% Share of property value growth that is residential 19% o g/ 1160500 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 205 • $580m of the regional property value growth is residential • Commercial land value growth lags agricultural land value Commercial values growing at 1/2 rate of total property values PROPERTY VALUE I RESIDENTIAL LAND VALUES RESIDENTIAL LAND VALUE GROWTH RATES, 2017-19 25% 20% ° 21° ° Residential land 20% 17% value increases 15% 15% vary across the 12% Focused Planning 10% 8% 10% Area 7% 5% 0% Becker Becker TWP Big Lake Big Lake TWP Monticello Monticello Silver Creek REGIONAL TWP RESIDENTIAL LAND PROPERTY VALUE I COMMERCIAL LAND VALUES COMMERCIAL LAND VALUE GROWTH RATES, 2017-19 25% 20% 20% 15% 10% 8% 5% 4% 0.2% 0.2% o% — Becker Becker TWP Big Lake Big Lake TWP Monticello 18% 12% 3% Monticello Silver Creek REGION TWP COMM LAND Growth share of total value classified commercial At 3% • Very small share of the overall property growth in the FPA is commercial • Over half of the commercial land value growth in the FPA occurred in Monticello, slowest growing in terms of value s. abs and Business Perf- - w---~ The planning team examined regional data from � the Minnesota Quarterly Census of Employment � Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 5: ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE Thursday June 18, 2020 5 fit � FRAMiFW�R2030 K partnering for the future 1■ V 111 TA JOBS& BUSINE..-- I JOB GROWTH 13,200 13, 000 121800 12,600 12,; 12,400 12,200 12,000 2015 JOB GROWTH IN THE FPA 12,927 12,997 2016 2017 2018 2019 New jobs added from 2015-2019 +750 +g% JOBS & BUSINE.L., I INDUSTRY MIX REGIONAL INDUSTRY MIX, 2019 6,000 Share of jobs in trade 5,000 and transportation (includes retail) 4,000 % O 3,000 37 2,000 1,400 1,000 676 247E 1 67 0 Construction Education and Financial Information Health Activities Services 2,116 1,610 Includes retail 4,815 440 706 53 -0 Leisure and Manufacturing Natural Other Services Professional Trade, Hospitality Resources and and Business Transportation Mining Services and Utilities JOBS & BUSINE! I EMPLOYMENT CHANGE REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT CHANGE BY SECTOR, 2015- 2019 Construction Education and Health Services -C8 Financial Activities Information Leisure and Hospitality Manufacturing Natural Resources and Mining -65 Other Services Professional and Business Services Trade, Transportation and Utilities -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 263 300 JOBS& BUSINr...-- I ESTABLISHMENT GROWTH REGIONAL BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT CHANGE, 2015-2019 11100 Change in the number of business establishments 1,050 (2015-19) + 19 O 1,000 O 900 893 L-019( 2015 919 2016 963 2017 1,064 1,02 Establishment growth outpacing growth in employment by 13 points over the same period 2018 2019 JOBS & BUSINESS I ESTABLISHMENT GROWTH 1,000 :11 .11 X11 200 0 2015 ■ Construction ■ Financial Activities REGIONAL ESTABLISHMENT GROWTH BY INDUSTRY ■ Leisure and Hospitality ■ Natural Resources and Mining ■ Professional and Business Services 2016 2017 ■ Education and Health Services Information ■ Manufacturing ■ Other Services 0 Trade, Transportation and Utilities 2018 2019 68% of establishment growth has come from construction JOBS & BUSINESS I WAGE GROWTH REGIONAL WAGES GROWTH (2015-19) $goo Change in wages paid by 0 $6so establishments in the FPA from 2015 to 2079 $661 $660 $640 87M $636 $620 +15% 603 $hoo $579 $580 $574 $560 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 JOBS & BUSINESS I WAGE GROWTH $51,000 $50,000 $49,000 $48,000 $47,000 $4E $46,000 2015 REGIONAL AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGES $50,895 2016 2017 2018 2019 Growth in annual average wages Growth in total wages in the region driven by growth in jobs not by higher average wages The total wage base (sum of all wages) grew by 15%, average wages by 9% JOBS & BUSINE.I., I WAGE GROWTH $90,000 $80,000 $78,998 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGES BY INDUSTRY $58,899 $46,259 Construction Education and Financial Health Services Activities $29,662 $16,713 $63,225 $35,156 $28,228 $59,010 $56,356 $50,895 Information Leisure and Manufacturing Natural Other Services Professional Trade, Total, All Hospitality Resources and and Business Transportation Industries Mining Services and Utilities Additional Information 20FRA1411L F 30 lyl , K partnering for the future W `i A little more about FRA Our communities anticipate significant growth the coming decades E There are many dynamic forces (internal and externarl that may impact our quality of life, place, and opportunity We have an opportunity to act and take advantage of this time and energy �9& 203 a 0 Ived .7 Who's invo i A � Led by the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership 704qft • Cities of Becker, Big Lake, and Monticello; Becker, Silver Creek, Monticello, and Big Lake townships; and Sherburne and Wright counties • Coalition formed in 2016 focused on T transportation issues • Partnership's evolving focus on regional challenges and opportunities C l e a r L a z e T w n. Clear L — 10 F1 Becker T r� \ Becker S h e r 6 u n e N a t i o n a l Wild life Ref u g e SHERBURNE COUNTY Z-�mm - n S a n d Dunes J rC J Big Lake TW Ell, P, T:�f Big Lak 1 za _ \ Elk Rive Silver Creek Two, L a k e Maria State Pa r \ 2s o r I r n a T w p. Monticello Regional Context St Cloud 2s ,�� Sherburne County AIL, or Twp. Maple I Monticello Twp. pie L e / 1 G H T COUNTY e tville WrghtCounty ss gu ffaIo Twp. Minnie ,p,US Buffalo t M chael \ The Planning Area IV Interstate City of Becker to us Highway City of Monticello zOs State Highway City of Big Lake Participating 7ownsh1ps Park Land D Surrounding Counties r Mississippi River Other Cities Open Water F R F 2030 1V1. A RK partnering for the future I r V It I ■ The Project What are the goals for the project? Through the planning project, the • Four components to the work plan Partnership will work to: • Reach consensus on major 1. Preparation opportunities and choices that 2. Engagement benefit the region, and successfully 3. Analysis collaborate to maximize benefit and minimize risk; 4. Framework Development • Position Partners to be leaders and • Integrate the intuition of the public and shape their own futures individually stakeholders with strong technical analysis and collectively, and; • Support connectivity within the region, and between the region and beyond. COMPON ENT 1 Preparation Kick-off the project Develop a strategy for promoting the plan and motivating participation Create a plan for community engagement !1i 1 COMPONENT 3 Technical Analysis Research key challenges and opportunities facing the region MEMO] 91A01 W� Community Engagement Think big about the future of the region and its communities Get the conversation started and think about our goals for the future Affirm our goals and build actions for reaching our goals Regional Factbook Briefings I VOL 5: ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE ; Thursday June 18, 2020 Identify priorities and implementation strategies 2030 FRAMEWORK partnering for the future 1 ■ V 111 How canYou get involve • Access the project website www. Reg ionalPlanning Partnership. Fra mework2030 • On the website you can ... • Find out more about the project; • Share your ideas through a community survey, • Contact the planning team with any questions �_ a A■ %. ® • �� ` . %• . . • � a �a UP .■ . , W 4■ -lip - � �.. �� ��� � ■ « �' � � fp � � �- *� _ f• . % �.1� \�� - ¥ z �X - « partnering WW to I t I TA To find o u t more, please visit.. � e | t s. , nalPlanningPartnership.org/piujuc � ewo r k 2 0 3 O - � - �� . 2 .- � ewo r k 2 0 3 O - ,yGNT COGy�. f9r R 5 G4/`r Monticello Monthly Report 2020 Wright County Sheriff's Office Sheriff Sean Deringer 3800 Braddock Ave. NE, Buffalo, MN 55313 1-800-362-3667 Fax:763-682-7610 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident 911 Abandoned Total: 4 06/08/20 09:58 911 Abandoned 2020041941 06/14/20 18:17 911 Abandoned 2020044032 06/15/20 14:58 911 Abandoned 2020044245 06/19/20 01:17 911 Abandoned 2020045246 911 Abandoned; Domestic Disturbance Total: 1 06/01/20 22:29 911 Abandoned: 2020039940 Domestic Disturbance QPpFE55I0NA�rS -• on 1 1 Case Number Codes How Reported 911 911ABANDON 911 911ABANDON 911 ABANDON 911 911ABANDON WP20014696 911 911ABANDON; 911 Abandoned; Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral Total: 1 06/08/20 20:49 911 Abandoned; 2020042164 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20015529 911 911ABANDON; 911 Hang-up Total: 32 06/01/2012:15 911 Hang-up 2020039724 06/04/2012:06 911 Hang-up 2020040724 06/04/20 18:45 911 Hang-up 2020040881 06/05/20 12:54 911 Hang-up 2020041065 06/05/20 15:46 911 Hang-up 2020041119 06/08/20 11:51 911 Hang-up 2020041989 06/08/20 22:03 911 Hang-up 2020042185 06/08/20 23:35 911 Hang-up 2020042206 06/09/20 13:52 911 Hang-up 2020042348 06/09/20 19:39 911 Hang-up 2020042440 06/11/2019:49 911 Hang-up 2020043052 06/12/20 12:09 911 Hang-up 2020043226 06/12/20 16:21 911 Hang-up 2020043333 06/15/20 21:15 911 Hang-up 2020044366 06/16/20 19:30 911 Hang-up 2020044631 06/17/20 08:00 911 Hang-up 2020044723 06/17/20 11:28 911 Hang-up 2020044775 06/17/20 16:33 911 Hang-up 2020044849 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 HANgG1U1P 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 HANgG1U1P 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 HANgG1U1P 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 Hang-up WP20015934 911 HAN P 911 HANGUP 911 HANgG1U1P 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP Page 1 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/18/20 11:57 911 Hang-up 2020045057 911 HAN911 GUP 06/18/20 21:48 911 Hang-up 2020045226 Domestic Disturbance WP20016593 2020039815 911 HAN911 GUP 06/19/20 22:04 911 Hang-up 2020045587 911OPEN11 06/01/20 18:38 911 Open 911 HAN911 GUP 06/20/20 00:24 911 Hang-up 2020045627 911 HAN911 GUP 06/20/20 23:31 911 Hang-up 2020045930 Line 2020040061 911 911 HAN911 GUP 06/21/20 00:58 911 Hang-up 2020045951 911OPEN 06/02/20 15:20 911 Open 911 HAN911 GUP 06/21/2018:35 911 Hang-up 2020046132 911 HAN911 GUP 06/26/20 08:57 911 Hang-up 2020047567 Line 2020040435 911 911 HAN911 GUP 06/26/20 12:15 911 Hang-up 2020047629 911 OPEN 06/05/20 16:41 911 Open 911 HAN911 GUP 06/27/20 00:46 911 Hang-up 2020047886 911 HAN911 GUP 06/27/20 20:40 911 Hang-up 2020048167 Line 2020041302 911 HAN911 GUP 06/27/20 23:36 911 Hang-up 2020048220 911 OPEN11 06/06/20 07:01 911 Open 911 HAN911 GUP 06/28/20 02:39 911 Hang-up 2020048261 911 HAN911 GUP 06/30/20 16:26 911 Hang-up 2020049020 Line 2020041696 911 911 HAN911 GUP 911 Hang-up; Check Welfare Total: 1 06/18/20 12:31 911 Hang-up; Check 2020045070 911 Open Line 2020041731 911 HANGUP; 911 Open Line Total: 60 06/01/20 14:45 911 Open Line 2020039767 911 911OPEN 06/01/20 16:36 911 Open Line 2020039815 911OPEN11 06/01/20 18:38 911 Open Line 2020039863 911 911 OPEN 06/02/20 10:45 911 Open Line 2020040061 911 911OPEN 06/02/20 15:20 911 Open Line 2020040157 911OPEN11 06/03/20 13:55 911 Open Line 2020040435 911 911 OPEN 06/05/20 16:41 911 Open Line 2020041141 911 911OPEN 06/06/20 05:02 911 Open Line 2020041302 911 OPEN11 06/06/20 07:01 911 Open Line 2020041313 11 911 OPEN 06/07/20 13:33 911 Open Line 2020041696 911 911OPEN 06/07/20 15:19 911 Open Line 2020041731 911OPEN11 06/07/20 15:59 911 Open Line 2020041742 911 911 OPEN 06/08/20 11:13 911 Open Line 2020041966 911 911 OPEN 06/08/20 11:41 911 Open Line 2020041986 1 911 OPEW 06/08/20 15:25 911 Open Line 2020042051 911 911 OPEN Page 2 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes Reported 06/08/20 16:45 911 Open Line 2020042089 ggHow 911OPEN11 06/08/20 19:57 911 Open Line 2020042151 911 911 OPEN 06/08/20 22:23 911 Open Line 2020042188 911 911 OPEN 06/09/20 11:50 911 Open Line 2020042316 g 911OPEN11 06/10/20 14:16 911 Open Line 2020042618 911 911 OPEN 06/10/20 16:06 911 Open Line 2020042669 911 911OPEN 06/10/20 17:33 911 Open Line 2020042702 911OPEN11 06/11/20 13:06 911 Open Line 2020042905 911 911 OPEN 06/11/20 16:21 911 Open Line 2020042974 911 911OPEN 06/13/20 08:55 911 Open Line 2020043576 911 OPEN11 06/13/20 12:31 911 Open Line 2020043626 911 911 OPEN 06/14/20 00:51 911 Open Line 2020043847 911 911 OPEN 06/14/20 10:02 911 Open Line 2020043903 g 911OPEN11 06/14/20 13:10 911 Open Line 2020043950 911 911 OPEN 06/14/20 16:52 911 Open Line 2020044012 911 911OPEN 06/15/20 15:36 911 Open Line 2020044258 911OPEN11 06/15/20 16:25 911 Open Line 2020044282 911 911 OPEN 06/17/20 17:48 911 Open Line 2020044886 911 911OPEN 06/17/20 18:00 911 Open Line 2020044889 911OPEN11 06/18/20 16:04 911 Open Line 2020045133 911 911 OPEN 06/18/20 19:43 911 Open Line 2020045204 911 911OPEN 06/19/20 08:26 911 Open Line 2020045274 911 OPEN11 06/19/20 13:41 911 Open Line 2020045380 911 911 OPEN 06/19/20 19:15 911 Open Line 2020045509 911 911OPEN 06/20/20 15:37 911 Open Line 2020045770 911OPEN11 06/21/20 18:43 911 Open Line 2020046137 911 911 OPEN 06/22/20 14:19 911 Open Line 2020046374 911 911 OPEN 06/22/20 16:51 911 Open Line 2020046433 1 911 OPEW 06/22/20 18:22 911 Open Line 2020046455 911 911 OPEN 06/23/20 10:26 911 Open Line 2020046590 911 911 OPEN 06/24/20 06:57 911 Open Line 2020046830 1 911 OPEW 06/24/20 13:24 911 Open Line 2020046931 911 911 OPEN 06/24/20 16:44 911 Open Line 2020046999 911 911 OPEN Page 3 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Agency Assist Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes Reported 06/24/20 17:47 911 Open Line 2020047026 ggHow AGASSIST 06/02/20 19:10 Agency Assist 2020040231 Agency Assist 911OPEN11 06/25/20 10:15 911 Open Line 2020047202 911 AGASSISTne 06/03/20 19:20 Agency Assist 2020040536 Agency Assist 911 OPEN 06/26/20 08:11 911 Open Line 2020047557 911 AGASSISTne 06/09/20 01:34 Agency Assist 2020042219 Agency Assist 911 OPEN 06/26/20 09:49 911 Open Line 2020047583 g AGASSIST 06/10/20 11:31 Agency Assist 2020042585 Agency Assist 911 OPEN11 06/27/20 17:53 911 Open Line 2020048098 911 AGASSISTne 06/10/20 13:51 Agency Assist 2020042610 Warrant - Arrest 911 OPEN 06/27/20 19:27 911 Open Line 2020048135 911 AGASSISTne 06/12/20 22:13 Agency Assist 2020043484 Agency Assist 911OPEN 06/28/20 11:59 911 Open Line 2020048369 AGASSIST 06/17/20 11:06 Agency Assist 2020044767 Agency Assist 911OPEN11 06/28/20 20:46 911 Open Line 2020048519 11 AGASSISTne 06/23/20 11:25 Agency Assist 2020046612 Agency Assist 911 OPEN 06/29/20 19:55 911 Open Line 2020048758 911 AGASSISTne 06/30/20 15:35 Agency Assist 2020049000 Agency Assist 911OPEN 06/30/20 10:17 911 Open Line 2020048888 AGASSIST 911OPEN11 06/30/20 14:18 911 Open Line 2020048976 911 911 OPEN 06/30/20 15:46 911 Open Line 2020049008 911 911 OPEN 911 Open Line; Medical - Overdose - Poisoning Total: 1 06/23/20 13:20 911 Open Line; Medical 2020046648 Medical - Overdose - PoisoninVP20017104 911 911 OPEN; Abandoned Vehicle Total: 3 06/09/20 09:59 Abandoned Vehicle 2020042286 Abandoned Vehicle WP20015556 Phone ABANDVEH 06/14/20 14:53 Abandoned Vehicle 2020043973 Abandoned Vehicle WP20016133 Phone ABANDVEH 06/19/20 09:13 Abandoned Vehicle 2020045293 Parking WP20016617 ne ABANDVEH Abuse Total: 1 06/26/2017:04 Abuse 2020047727 Abuse WP20017426 Phone ABUSE Agency Assist Total: 10 06/01/20 17:35 Agency Assist 2020039835 Agency Assist WP20014669 ne AGASSIST 06/02/20 19:10 Agency Assist 2020040231 Agency Assist WP20014798 AGASSISTne 06/03/20 19:20 Agency Assist 2020040536 Agency Assist WP20014908 AGASSISTne 06/09/20 01:34 Agency Assist 2020042219 Agency Assist WP20015535 ne AGASSIST 06/10/20 11:31 Agency Assist 2020042585 Agency Assist WP20015649 AGASSISTne 06/10/20 13:51 Agency Assist 2020042610 Warrant - Arrest WP20015657 AGASSISTne 06/12/20 22:13 Agency Assist 2020043484 Agency Assist WP20015960 ne AGASSIST 06/17/20 11:06 Agency Assist 2020044767 Agency Assist WP20016429 AGASSISTne 06/23/20 11:25 Agency Assist 2020046612 Agency Assist WP20017081 AGASSISTne 06/30/20 15:35 Agency Assist 2020049000 Agency Assist WP20017853 ne AGASSIST Alarm Total: 3 Page 4 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/11/2019:10 Alarm 2020043039 Alarm WP20015815 911 2020043061 06/20/2011:05 Assault 2020045697 06/22/2012:04 ALARM 06/12/20 21:42 Alarm 2020043466 Alarm WP20015957 Phone ASSAULT1 Assault WP20016749 ALARM 06/16/20 21:26 Alarm 2020044655 Alarm WP20016388 911 ASSAU Medical - Psychiatric - WP20017432 ALARM Animal Total: 11 06/01/2012:45 Animal 2020039732 Animal WP20014629 911 ANIMAL 06/03/20 21:21 Animal 2020040576 911 ANIMAL 06/04/2012:24 Animal 2020040732 Animal WP20014971 911 ANIMAL 06/04/2015:36 Animal 2020040800 Animal WP20014996 911 ANIMAL 06/06/2014:59 Animal 2020041444 Animal WP20015237 Phone ANIMAL 06/08/2012:23 Animal 2020042000 Animal WP20015465 911 ANIMAL 06/09/2019:23 Animal 2020042432 Animal WP20015598 Phone ANIMAL 06/17/2016:45 Animal 2020044855 Animal WP20016455 Phone ANIMAL 06/18/2016:22 Animal 2020045142 Animal WP20016566 Phone ANIMAL 06/25/2013:31 Animal 2020047278 Phone ANIMAL 06/26/2011:41 Animal 2020047612 Animal WP20017392 Phone ANIMAL Animal - Abuse Total: 2 06/03/20 10:53 Animal - Abuse 2020040374 Animal - Abuse WP20014846 Phone ANABUSE 06/19/20 16:34 Animal - Abuse 2020045432 Animal - Abuse WP20016667 ANABUSE Animal - Barking Dog Total: 1 06/30/20 09:42 Animal - Barking Dog 2020048878 Animal - Barking Dog WP20017808 ANBARKhone Animal - Bites - Attacks Total: 2 06/17/20 20:08 Animal - Bites - Attacks 2020044923 Animal - Bites - Attacks WP20016483 Phone ANBITE 06/26/20 19:10 Animal - Bites - Attacks 2020047783 Animal - Bites - Attacks WP20017446 Phone ANBITE Assault Total: 7 06/05/2013:39 Assault 2020041081 06/06/20 08:21 Assault 2020041325 06/10/2015:26 Assault 2020042651 06/11/20 20:06 Assault 2020043061 06/20/2011:05 Assault 2020045697 06/22/2012:04 Assault 2020046323 06/26/2017:35 Assault 2020047743 Assault WP20015103 ASSAULT1 Disorderly WP20015200 Phone ASSAU Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20015673 hone ASSAU PT Domestic Disturbance WP20015821 ASSAULT1 Assault WP20016749 ASSAULT Civil Child Custody WP20016973 PT hone ASSAU Medical - Psychiatric - WP20017432 ASSAULT1 Page 5 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported Burglary Total: 2 06/01/20 23:29 Burglary 2020039953 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20014699 BURG Phone 06/30/2018:55 Burglary 2020049067 Burglary WP20017867 BURG Phone Check Welfare Total: 29 06/02/20 02:11 Check Welfare 2020039981 Check Welfare WP20014710 Phone CHKWELF 06/02/20 10:04 Check Welfare 2020040047 Check Welfare WP20014731 Phone CHKWELF 06/02/20 11:45 Check Welfare 2020040086 Check Welfare WP20014746 Phone CHKWELF 06/06/20 15:25 Check Welfare 2020041461 Check Welfare WP20015242 Phone CHKWELF 06/06/20 21:27 Check Welfare 2020041556 Check Welfare WP20015282 911 CHKWELF 06/07/20 14:39 Check Welfare 2020041712 Check Welfare WP20015347 Phone CHKWELF 06/07/20 20:37 Check Welfare 2020041821 Check Welfare WP20015385 911 CHKWELF 06/08/20 15:59 Check Welfare 2020042060 Check Welfare WP20015486 Phone CHKWELF 06/09/20 19:02 Check Welfare 2020042427 Check Welfare WP20015596 911 CHKWELF 06/09/20 22:23 Check Welfare 2020042486 Check Welfare WP20015611 911 CHKWELF 06/12/20 20:16 Check Welfare 2020043428 Check Welfare WP20015946 Phone CHKWELF 06/13/20 13:44 Check Welfare 2020043648 Check Welfare WP20016013 Phone CHKWELF 06/18/20 11:06 Check Welfare 2020045045 Check Welfare WP20016525 Phone CHKWELF 06/18/20 11:31 Check Welfare 2020045049 Check Welfare WP20016528 Phone CHKWELF 06/18/20 14:22 Check Welfare 2020045098 Check Welfare WP20016548 911 CHKWELF 06/19/20 16:15 Check Welfare 2020045424 Check Welfare WP20016663 911 CHKWELF 06/20/20 13:05 Check Welfare 2020045724 Check Welfare WP20016759 Phone CHKWELF 06/22/20 00:21 Check Welfare 2020046222 Check Welfare WP20016934 Phone CHKWELF 06/22/20 16:23 Check Welfare 2020046417 Check Welfare WP20017009 911 CHKWELF 06/23/20 07:38 Check Welfare 2020046554 Check Welfare WP20017060 Phone CHKWELF 06/23/20 20:55 Check Welfare 2020046773 Check Welfare WP20017133 Phone CHKWELF 06/24/20 12:56 Check Welfare 2020046923 Check Welfare WP20017186 Phone CHKWELF 06/25/20 10:40 Check Welfare 2020047215 Check Welfare WP20017279 Phone CHKWELF 06/25/20 11:20 Check Welfare 2020047230 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017289 CHKWEPhone LF 06/25/20 15:20 Check Welfare 2020047331 Check Welfare WP20017315 Phone CHKWELF 06/26/20 11:30 Check Welfare 2020047608 Check Welfare WP20017389 911 CHKWELF 06/26/20 20:54 Check Welfare 2020047809 Check Welfare WP20017459 Phone CHKWELF 06/26/20 22:42 Check Welfare 2020047851 Check Welfare WP20017479 Phone CHKWELF 06/28/20 15:55 Check Welfare 2020048433 Check Welfare WP20017663 Phone CHKWELF Page 6 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported Check Welfare; Domestic Disturbance Total: 1 06/11/20 03:21 Check Welfare; 2020042809 Domestic Disturbance WP20015732 Phone CHKWELF; DOMESTIC Citizen Aid Total: 18 06/01/20 15:39 Citizen Aid 2020039793 Citizen Aid WP20014654 Phone CITAID 06/02/20 13:52 Citizen Aid 2020040134 Citizen Aid WP20014766 Phone CITAID 06/02/20 23:47 Citizen Aid 2020040286 Citizen Aid WP20014815 Phone CITAID 06/03/20 11:49 Citizen Aid 2020040391 Citizen Aid WP20014855 Phone CITAID 06/04/20 17:16 Citizen Aid 2020040845 Citizen Aid WP20015015 Phone CITAID 06/06/20 13:52 Citizen Aid 2020041422 Citizen Aid WP20015229 Phone CITAID 06/06/20 16:23 Citizen Aid 2020041478 Citizen Aid WP20015251 Phone CITAID 06/08/20 04:17 Citizen Aid 2020041886 Citizen Aid WP20015413 911 CITAID 06/12/20 11:09 Citizen Aid 2020043204 Citizen Aid WP20015871 Phone CITAID 06/13/20 01:04 Citizen Aid 2020043530 Citizen Aid WP20015976 Phone CITAID 06/19/20 21:46 Citizen Aid 2020045576 Citizen Aid WP20016705 911 CITAID 06/20/20 17:34 Citizen Aid 2020045808 Citizen Aid WP20016791 Phone CITAID 06/23/20 10:54 Citizen Aid 2020046603 Citizen Aid WP20017076 Phone CITAID 06/24/20 06:00 Citizen Aid 2020046824 Citizen Aid WP20017150 Phone CITAID 06/25/20 19:16 Citizen Aid 2020047416 Citizen Aid WP20017333 911 CITAID 06/25/20 22:43 Citizen Aid 2020047482 Citizen Aid WP20017354 911 CITAID 06/27/20 08:27 Citizen Aid 2020047924 Citizen Aid WP20017502 Phone CITAID 06/30/20 14:25 Citizen Aid 2020048978 Citizen Aid WP20017839 Phone CITAID Civil Complaint Total: 30 06/01/20 15:33 Civil Complaint 2020039788 Civil Complaint WP20014650 Phone CIV 06/03/20 15:00 Civil Complaint 2020040459 Citizen Aid WP20014878 Phone CIV 06/05/20 10:54 Civil Complaint 2020041026 Civil Complaint WP20015082 Phone CIV 06/08/20 11:10 Civil Complaint 2020041964 Civil Complaint WP20015451 911 CIV 06/11/20 15:34 Civil Complaint 2020042953 Civil Complaint WP20015790 CIV 06/12/20 13:45 Civil Complaint 2020043275 Civil Complaint WP20015900 911 CIV 06/12/20 16:07 Civil Complaint 2020043325 Citizen Aid WP20015924 911 CIV 06/13/20 15:53 Civil Complaint 2020043692 Civil Complaint WP20016030 Phone CIV 06/13/20 21:27 Civil Complaint 2020043795 Civil Complaint WP20016072 Phone CIV 06/14/20 14:17 Civil Complaint 2020043965 Check Welfare WP20016129 Phone CIV Page 7 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/14/20 22:06 Civil Complaint 2020044090 Civil Complaint WP20016181 911 CIVPR02fficer 06/03/20 08:50 Civil Process CIV 06/16/20 08:36 Civil Complaint 2020044440 Civil Child Custody WP20016317 Civil Process Phone Officer CIVPROC CIV Civil Process 06/16/20 22:15 Civil Complaint 2020044670 Civil Complaint WP20016399 CIVPROpfficer Phone Civil Process 2020040694 CIV CIVPROC 06/18/20 15:35 Civil Complaint 2020045119 Civil Child Custody WP20016563 Phone CIVPROC 06/05/20 10:05 Civil Process 2020041016 CIV 06/19/20 23:34 Civil Complaint 2020045617 Civil Complaint WP20016718 Phone CIVPROOfficer CIV 06/22/20 17:42 Civil Complaint 2020046447 Harassment WP20017023 Phone CIV 06/22/20 19:05 Civil Complaint 2020046468 Civil Complaint WP20017031 Phone CIV 06/23/20 12:08 Civil Complaint 2020046629 Civil Complaint WP20017091 Phone CIV 06/24/20 09:48 Civil Complaint 2020046862 Civil Complaint WP20017162 Phone CIV 06/24/20 16:50 Civil Complaint 2020047002 Civil Complaint WP20017206 911 CIV 06/25/20 08:13 Civil Complaint 2020047177 Civil Complaint WP20017268 Phone CIV 06/25/20 15:38 Civil Complaint 2020047340 Civil Child Custody WP20017318 Phone CIV 06/26/20 14:15 Civil Complaint 2020047662 Civil Complaint WP20017405 Phone CIV 06/26/20 15:35 Civil Complaint 2020047688 Civil Complaint WP20017414 Phone CIV 06/28/20 09:49 Civil Complaint 2020048325 Civil Complaint WP20017632 911 CIV 06/28/20 10:10 Civil Complaint 2020048337 Civil Complaint WP20017634 911 CIV 06/28/20 20:33 Civil Complaint 2020048516 Civil Complaint WP20017685 Phone CIV 06/29/20 10:14 Civil Complaint 2020048620 Vulnerable Adult WP20017716 Phone CIV 06/29/20 12:05 Civil Complaint 2020048636 Citizen Aid WP20017724 Phone CIV 06/30/20 08:00 Civil Complaint 2020048859 Civil Complaint WP20017799 Phone CIV Civil Complaint; MVA - No Injuries Total: 1 06/26/20 14:59 Civil Complaint; MVA - 2020047678 Citizen Aid WP20017411 Phone CIV; MVA Civil Process Total: 20 06/01/20 10:05 Civil Process 2020039682 Officer CIVPROC 06/02/20 13:16 Civil Process 2020040120 CIVPR02fficer 06/03/20 08:50 Civil Process 2020040347 CIVPROOfficer 06/03/20 09:20 Civil Process 2020040350 Officer CIVPROC 06/03/20 14:00 Civil Process 2020040439 CIVPROpfficer 06/04/20 09:43 Civil Process 2020040694 CIVPROC 06/04/20 17:37 Civil Process 2020040851 Officer CIVPROC 06/05/20 10:05 Civil Process 2020041016 CIVPR02fficer 06/08/20 10:07 Civil Process 2020041948 CIVPROOfficer Page 8 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # 06/15/20 11:45 Civil Process 2020044187 06/17/20 08:03 Civil Process 2020044724 06/22/20 15:53 Civil Process 2020046412 06/23/20 10:18 Civil Process 2020046588 06/23/20 16:04 Civil Process 2020046700 06/23/20 17:46 Civil Process 2020046726 06/24/20 15:16 Civil Process 2020046968 06/24/20 15:31 Civil Process 2020046977 06/25/20 12:17 Civil Process 2020047250 06/26/20 15:47 Civil Process 2020047692 06/30/20 17:52 Civil Process 2020049048 Commercial Fire Alarm Total: 5 06/14/20 09:07 Commercial Fire Alarm 2020043889 06/14/20 19:34 Commercial Fire Alarm 2020044054 06/15/20 05:11 Commercial Fire Alarm 2020044114 06/19/20 17:39 Commercial Fire Alarm 2020045465 06/30/20 19:16 Commercial Fire Alarm 2020049073 Commercial General Alarm Total: 14 06/01/20 01:34 Case Number Codes How Reported Commercial General 2020039633 06/03/20 14:38 Commercial General 2020040451 06/04/20 00:32 Commercial General 2020040618 06/04/20 17:50 CIVPROCfficer Commercial General 2020040858 06/09/20 17:08 Commercial General 2020042403 06/14/20 09:04 Commercial General 2020043888 06/15/20 04:19 CIVPR02pfficer Commercial General 2020044112 06/22/20 05:54 Commercial General 2020046241 06/25/20 05:28 WP20017126 Commercial General 2020047154 06/26/20 04:00 CIVPROC Commercial General 2020047533 06/28/20 18:47 Commercial General 2020048489 06/28/20 20:07 Commercial General 2020048510 06/30/20 03:00 Officer Commercial General 2020048828 06/30/20 16:58 Commercial General 2020049036 Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported CIVPROppCfficer CIVPROCfficer Officer CIVPROC CIVPR02pfficer CIVPROCfficer Civil Process WP20017126 Officer CIVPROC CIVPR02pfficer CIVPROCfficer Officer CIVPROC CIVPR02pfficer CIVPROCfficer Phone ALARM Commercial Fire Alarm WP20016168 Phone ALARM Commercial Fire Alarm WP20016195 Phone ALARM Commercial Fire Alarm WP20016677 Phone ALARM Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20014588 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20014874 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20014935 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20015019 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20015589 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20016103 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20016192 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20016941 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20017260 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20017370 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20017678 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20017683 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20017791 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WP20017860 Phone ALARM Page 9 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported Court Order Violation Total: 3 06/20/20 20:10 Court Order Violation 2020045860 Court Order Violation WP20016813 Phone COV 06/22/20 16:50 Court Order Violation 2020046432 Court Order Violation WP20017018 Phone COV 06/23/20 21:48 Court Order Violation 2020046786 Civil Complaint WP20017138 COV 911 Criminal Damage to Property Total: 9 06/03/20 11:15 Criminal Damage to 2020040382 06/05/20 11:58 Criminal Damage to 2020041045 06/13/20 03:42 Criminal Damage to 2020043549 06/17/20 14:58 Criminal Damage to 2020044825 06/19/20 22:33 Criminal Damage to 2020045598 06/22/20 16:38 Criminal Damage to 2020046422 06/23/20 11:29 Criminal Damage to 2020046616 06/24/20 16:41 Criminal Damage to 2020046998 06/28/20 15:33 Criminal Damage to 2020048425 Disabled Vehicle Total: 9 06/01/20 11:30 Disabled Vehicle 2020039707 06/01/20 13:16 Disabled Vehicle 2020039735 06/01/20 14:22 Disabled Vehicle 2020039760 06/06/20 17:46 Disabled Vehicle 2020041499 06/09/20 06:28 Disabled Vehicle 2020042237 06/15/20 13:50 Disabled Vehicle 2020044227 06/28/20 19:07 Disabled Vehicle 2020048496 06/28/20 19:18 Disabled Vehicle 2020048498 06/28/20 20:48 Disabled Vehicle 2020048520 Disorderly Total: 2 Civil Complaint WP20014849 Phone 2020041015 CDP Criminal Damage to Property WPRK20015098DP 2020041606 Criminal Damage to Property WP20015981 911 2020041892 CDP Criminal Damage to Property WP20016447 2020041985 Domestic Disturbance CDP Civil Complaint WP20016710 911 CDP Criminal Damage to Property WP20017016 Phone CDP Criminal Damage to Property WP20017084 CDP Criminal Damage to Property WP20017205 Phone CDP Criminal Damage to Property WP20017662 Phone CDP Disabled Vehicle WP20014624 Phone DISABL 911 DISABLVEH DISABLVEHne DISABLVEHne DISABLVEHne DISABLVEHne DISABLVEH DISABLVEHne DISABLVEHne 06/26/20 05:00 Disorderly 2020047538 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017371 DISORD911 06/27/20 20:32 Disorderly 2020048163 Indecent Exposure WP20017577 DISORD Phone Domestic Disturbance Total: 22 06/05/20 10:03 Domestic Disturbance 2020041015 06/07/20 02:11 Domestic Disturbance 2020041606 06/08/20 06:04 Domestic Disturbance 2020041892 06/08/20 11:40 Domestic Disturbance 2020041985 Domestic Disturbance WP20015078 DOMESWU Disorderly WP20015303 DOMESTIC Civil Child Custody WP20015416 ne DOMESTPIC Domestic Disturbance WP20015459 DOMESTIC Page 10 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call 06/09/20 07:59 Domestic Disturbance 06/09/20 21:55 Domestic Disturbance 06/11/20 22:31 Domestic Disturbance 06/13/20 20:57 Domestic Disturbance 06/14/20 16:02 Domestic Disturbance 06/15/20 07:50 Domestic Disturbance 06/15/20 11:59 Domestic Disturbance 06/16/20 18:24 Domestic Disturbance 06/16/20 18:35 Domestic Disturbance 06/21/20 23:02 Domestic Disturbance 06/23/20 18:57 Domestic Disturbance 06/27/20 02:49 Domestic Disturbance 06/27/20 12:24 Domestic Disturbance 06/27/20 13:40 Domestic Disturbance 06/27/20 15:11 Domestic Disturbance 06/27/20 18:02 Domestic Disturbance 06/27/20 21:41 Domestic Disturbance 06/28/20 22:07 Domestic Disturbance Drugs Total: 4 06/18/20 22:30 Drugs 06/23/2017:32 Drugs 06/23/20 20:09 Drugs 06/25/20 06:20 Drugs CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 2020042257 Domestic Disturbance WP20015547 Phone DOMESTIC 2020042477 Domestic Disturbance WP20015608 DOMESTICone 2020043101 Domestic Disturbance WP20015834 911 DOMESTIC 2020043786 Disorderly WP20016066 DOMESVP 2020043989 Court Order Violation WP20016139 DOMESTICone 2020044124 Domestic Disturbance WP20016199 Phone DOMESTIC 2020044192 Domestic Disturbance WP20016219 Phone DOMESTIC 2020044610 Domestic Disturbance WP20016373 DOMES91 TIC 2020044613 Domestic Disturbance WP20016377 911 DOMESTIC 2020046210 Domestic Disturbance WP20016930 DOMESTIC 2020046750 Domestic Disturbance WP20017122 DOMES91 TIC 2020047907 Domestic Disturbance WP20017495 911 DOMESTIC 2020047994 Domestic Disturbance WP20017520 DOMESTIC 2020048020 Domestic Disturbance WP20017531 DOMES91 TIC 2020048049 Unwanted Person WP20017539 11 DOMESTIC 2020048103 Check Welfare WP20017554 9 DOMESTIC 2020048185 Domestic Disturbance WP20017585 DOMES91 TIC 2020048540 Domestic Disturbance WP20017696 911 DOMESTIC 2020045229 Drugs WP20016595 Phone DRUGS 2020046723 Drugs WP20017114 911 DRUGS 2020046763 Drugs WP20017130 Phone DRUGS 2020047158 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017261 Phone DRUGS Drugs; CSC Sex Offense Total: 1 06/06/20 19:58 Drugs; CSC Sex 2020041537 Domestic Disturbance Dumping Total: 1 06/07/20 20:51 Dumping 2020041826 Dumping Extra Patrol Total: 1 06/03/20 21:42 Extra Patrol Fight Total: 3 06/03/2018:08 Fight 06/08/20 21:07 Fight 2020040586 2020040511 Disorderly 2020042170 Fight WP20015275 911 DRUGS; CSC WP20015389 DUMPING one XP Phone WP20014899 911 FIGHT WP20015523 FIGHT Phone Page 11 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/30/2015:35 Fight 2020049001 Fight WP20017852 Phone FIGHT Fire - Electrical Total: 1 06/04/20 20:31 Fire - Other 2020040903 06/18/20 21:11 Fire - Electrical 2020045217 Fire - Electrical 1 WP20016588 FELECT91RIC Fire - Gas Leak Total: 1 FIREWORKS 06/12/20 15:57 Fire - Gas Leak 2020043320 Fire - Gas Leak WP20015921 911 Fire - Other 2020040969 Fire - Other FGASLEAK Fire - Grass Total: 1 06/16/20 13:46 Fire - Grass 2020044527 Fire - Grass WP20016350 911 FGRASS Fire - Other Total: 8 06/02/20 13:25 Fire - Other 2020040124 Criminal Damage to Property WP20014761 WP20015163 Phone FO 06/05/20 21:49 06/04/20 20:31 Fire - Other 2020040903 WP20015169 911 911 FIREWORKS 06/05/20 22:16 FO 2020041249 06/05/20 06:48 Fire - Other 2020040969 Fire - Other WP20015060 Phone FIREWORKS 06/07/20 22:46 Fireworks 2020041851 FO WP20015398 06/05/20 22:08 Fire - Other 2020041248 Fire - Other WP20015172 Phone 06/13/20 20:41 Fireworks 2020043783 Fireworks WP20016065 FO 06/14/20 15:44 Fire - Other 2020043983 Fire - Other WP20016136 06/15/20 20:57 911 2020044363 Fireworks WP20016293 911 FO 06/22/20 13:00 Fire - Other 2020046340 Fire - Other WP20016979 2020044372 Phone WP20016297 Phone FO 06/28/20 00:45 Fire - Other 2020048242 Fire - Other WP20017608 WP20016795 Phone FO 06/20/20 20:45 06/29/20 21:11 Fire - Other 2020048783 Fire - Other WP20017778 Phone FIREWORKS 06/20/20 22:18 FO 2020045911 Fire - Structure Total: 2 g�1 06/06/20 01:27 Fire - Structure 2020041288 Fire - Structure WP20015187 FSTRUCTURE 06/23/20 03:04 Fire - Structure 2020046540 Fire - Structure WP20017054 911 FSTRUCTURE Fireworks Total: 15 06/05/20 20:50 Fireworks 2020041218 Fireworks WP20015163 Phone FIREWORKS 06/05/20 21:49 Fireworks 2020041241 Fireworks WP20015169 911 FIREWORKS 06/05/20 22:16 Fireworks 2020041249 Fireworks WP20015174 hone FIREWORKS 06/07/20 22:46 Fireworks 2020041851 Fireworks WP20015398 Phone FIREWORKS 06/13/20 20:41 Fireworks 2020043783 Fireworks WP20016065 911 FIREWORKS 06/15/20 20:57 Fireworks 2020044363 Fireworks WP20016293 911 FIREWORKS 06/15/20 21:38 Fireworks 2020044372 Fireworks WP20016297 Phone FIREWORKS 06/20/2017:46 Fireworks 2020045814 Fireworks WP20016795 911 FIREWORKS 06/20/20 20:45 Fireworks 2020045872 Fireworks WP20016824 hone FIREWORKS 06/20/20 22:18 Fireworks 2020045911 Fireworks WP20016829 Phone FIREWORKS 06/21/20 20:52 Fireworks 2020046170 Fireworks WP20016917 911 FIREWORKS 06/25/20 22:15 Fireworks 2020047469 Fireworks WP20017353 911 FIREWORKS Page 12 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/26/20 22:03 Fireworks 2020047833 Fireworks WP20017472 FIREWORKS 06/26/20 22:43 Fireworks 2020047852 Fireworks WP20017478 911 FIREWORKS 06/27/20 21:42 Fireworks 2020048186 Fireworks WP20017590 911 FIREWORKS Fireworks; Extra Patrol Total: 1 06/27/20 18:35 Fireworks; Extra Patrol 2020048112 Fireworks Found Person Total: 3 WP20017557 Phone FIREWORKS; XP 06/19/20 20:42 Found Person 2020045548 Found Person WP20016698 911 06/10/20 11:53 Gopher State One 2020042589 06/22/20 18:19 Gopher State One 2020046454 FNDPERS 06/21/20 11:38 Found Person 2020046020 Found Person WP20016861 911 06/05/20 09:25 Harassment 2020041001 Harassment 06/09/20 23:10 Harassment 2020042493 FNDPERS 06/21/20 15:58 Found Person 2020046096 Found Person WP20016891 Phone FNDPERS Fraud - Checks - Cards Total: 5 06/11/20 10:50 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2020042859 Fraud - Checks - Cards WP20015752 Phone H FRAUDCppone 06/12/20 14:45 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2020043296 Fraud - Checks - Cards WP20015911 FRAUDC H 06/20/20 17:49 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2020045816 Theft - Identity Theft WP20016796 one FRAUDCH 06/22/20 07:11 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2020046248 Fraud - Checks - Cards WP20016948 Phone H FRAUDCpone 06/22/20 11:42 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2020046313 Fraud - Checks - Cards WP20016969 FRAUDC H Fraud - Forgery Total: 1 06/15/20 14:59 Fraud - Forgery Fraud - Internet Total: 2 06/11/20 13:54 Fraud - Internet 06/30/20 17:21 Fraud - Internet Funeral Escort Total: 1 06/06/20 09:04 Funeral Escort 2020044247 Fraud - Forgery WP20016241 Phone FRAUDF RCS 2020042923 Fraud - Internet WP20015778 Phone FRAUDINT 2020049042 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017863 FRAUDINTne 2020041330 Gopher State One Total: 3 06/03/20 11:27 Gopher State One 2020040385 06/10/20 11:53 Gopher State One 2020042589 06/22/20 18:19 Gopher State One 2020046454 Harassment Total: 6 06/03/2019:56 Harassment 2020040548 Harassment 06/05/20 09:25 Harassment 2020041001 Harassment 06/09/20 23:10 Harassment 2020042493 Harassment 06/18/2011:49 Harassment 2020045056 Harassment Ph FUNERAL one GOPH Phone GOPH Phone GOPH Phone WP20014911 11 HARASS WP20015074 HARASShone WP20015614 HARASShone WP20016533 HARASS Page 13 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/24/20 20:06 Harassment 2020047084 Court Order Violation WP20017238 911 HARASS 06/28/2014:06 Harassment 2020048400 Harassment WP20017657 Phone HARASS Info Total: 10 06/01/20 15:01 Info 2020039773 Phone INFO 06/03/20 07:16 Info 2020040333 Phone INFO 06/03/20 17:38 Info 2020040501 Phone INFO 06/06/20 17:21 Info 2020041491 Phone INFO 06/09/20 07:03 Info 2020042244 Phone INFO 06/09/20 17:10 Info 2020042404 Phone INFO 06/10/20 17:10 Info 2020042695 Phone INFO 06/17/20 14:22 Info 2020044813 Phone INFO 06/23/20 16:29 Info 2020046711 Phone INFO 06/26/20 09:24 Info 2020047575 Info WMC120017382 INFO Intoxicated Person Total: 2 06/09/20 23:21 Intoxicated Person 2020042495 Intoxicated Person WP20015616 911 INTOXPgER 06/19/20 23:18 Intoxicated Person 2020045610 Intoxicated Person WP20016715 INTOXPER Juvenile - Complaint Total: 10 06/02/20 22:53 Juvenile - Complaint 2020040274 Juvenile - Complaint WP20014812 hh JUVCOMPone 06/09/20 16:15 Juvenile - Complaint 2020042392 Juvenile - Complaint WP20015585 JUVCOMhone 06/10/20 13:55 Juvenile - Complaint 2020042612 Juvenile - Complaint WP20015658 Phhhone JUVCO 06/13/20 15:50 Juvenile - Complaint 2020043690 Juvenile - Complaint WP20016028 JUVCOMPone 06/15/20 22:20 Juvenile - Complaint 2020044381 Juvenile - Complaint WP20016299 JUVCOMhone 06/17/20 16:40 Juvenile - Complaint 2020044854 Juvenile - Complaint WP20016454 Phhhone JUVCO 06/24/20 22:47 Juvenile - Complaint 2020047115 Juvenile - Complaint WP20017250 JUVCOMPone 06/26/20 11:02 Juvenile - Complaint 2020047604 Juvenile - Complaint WP20017388 JUVCOM11 06/27/20 08:50 Juvenile - Complaint 2020047925 Check Welfare WP20017503 JUVCON11 06/28/20 16:47 Juvenile - Complaint 2020048457 Juvenile - Complaint WP20017668 JUVCOMPI Juvenile - Party Total: 1 06/12/20 21:44 Juvenile - Party 2020043468 Juvenile - Party WP20015953 Officer JUVPARTY Littering Total: 2 06/10/20 15:54 Littering 2020042663 Littering WP20015677 LITTER Phone 06/23/20 07:52 Littering 2020046556 Littering WP20017062 LITTER Phone Page 14 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported Lock Out - Lock In Total: 1 06/27/20 20:52 Lock Out - Lock In 2020048173 Lock Out - Lock In WP20017581 911 LOCK Lost - Found Property Total: 7 06/07/20 15:38 Lost - Found Property 2020041737 Lost - Found Property WP20015352 Medical - Back Pain 2020043978 06/20/20 07:52 Medical - Back Pain 2020045659 06/21/20 08:07 Medical - Back Pain 2020045982 LOSTPROP 06/09/20 14:12 Lost - Found Property 2020042353 Lost - Found Property WP20015575 2020047384 LOSTPROP 06/11/20 06:01 Lost - Found Property 2020042813 Lost - Found Property WP20015733 LOSTPROP 06/14/20 09:04 Lost - Found Property 2020043886 Lost - Found Property WP20016104 LOSTPROP 06/16/20 21:33 Lost - Found Property 2020044658 Lost - Found Property WP20016395 LOSTPROP 06/19/20 22:36 Lost - Found Property 2020045599 Lost - Found Property WP20016714 LOSTPROP 06/27/20 12:55 Lost - Found Property 2020048004 Lost - Found Property WP20017526 LOSTPROP Medical - Abdominal Pain Total: 1 06/15/20 14:53 Medical - Abdominal 2020044242 Medical - Abdominal Pain WP20016237 MABDO1 9 Medical - Allergies - Stings Total: 2 06/01/20 17:44 Medical - Allergies - 2020039838 Medical - Allergies - Stings WP20014670 Phone MALLERGI 06/30/20 14:05 Medical - Allergies - 2020048972 MALLERGIES Medical - Back Pain Total: 5 06/08/20 17:36 Medical - Back Pain 2020042110 06/10/20 13:30 Medical - Back Pain 2020042608 06/14/20 15:20 Medical - Back Pain 2020043978 06/20/20 07:52 Medical - Back Pain 2020045659 06/21/20 08:07 Medical - Back Pain 2020045982 Medical - Bleeding - Lacerations Total: 2 06/01/20 15:19 Medical - Bleeding - 2020039782 06/25/20 17:34 Medical - Bleeding - 2020047384 Medical - Breathing Problems Total: 8 06/01/20 06:38 Medical - Breathing 2020039645 06/01/20 19:35 Medical - Breathing 2020039885 06/04/20 19:47 Medical - Breathing 2020040898 06/07/20 09:06 Medical - Breathing 2020041638 06/07/20 23:10 Medical - Breathing 2020041855 06/09/20 21:20 Medical - Breathing 2020042466 06/12/20 15:57 Medical - Breathing 2020043319 MBACK Phone 911 MBACK 911 MBACK 911 MBACK 911 MBACK MBLEEDING MBLEEDING Medical - Breathing Problems WP20014597 11 MBREA HING MBREATHING MBREATHING MBREATHING Medical - Breathing Problems WP2001540211 MBREA HING MBREATHING MBREATHING Page 15 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident 06/13/20 10:16 Medical - Breathing 2020043595 Medical - Breathing Problems; Check Welfare Total: 1 06/25/20 15:08 Medical - Breathing 2020047327 Medical - Chest Pain Total: 1 06/20/20 14:40 Medical - Chest Pain 2020045751 Medical - Childbirth - Obstetrics Total: 1 06/10/20 20:59 Medical - Childbirth - 2020042766 Medical - Choking Total: 1 06/02/20 05:50 Medical - Choking 2020039994 Medical - Diabetic Total: 2 06/13/20 21:38 Medical - Diabetic 2020043802 06/25/20 17:58 Medical - Diabetic 2020047391 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet Total: 14 06/01/20 07:07 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020039648 06/02/20 00:20 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020039965 06/03/20 07:51 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020040337 06/05/20 03:15 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020040961 06/07/20 12:15 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020041676 06/10/20 14:43 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020042627 06/12/20 13:10 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020043257 06/14/20 05:13 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020043870 06/14/20 14:38 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020043971 06/14/20 15:04 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020043974 06/14/20 15:31 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020043981 06/16/20 00:31 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020044402 06/19/20 13:47 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020045382 06/26/20 16:30 Medical - Fall Under 6 2020047713 Medical - Heart Problems Total: 1 06/18/20 18:46 Medical - Heart 2020045183 Case Number Codes How Reported MBREATHING MBREATHING; 911 MCHESTP Medical - Psychiatric - WP20015715 911 MCHILDBIRTH MCHOKING MDIABETTIC MDIABETIC Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WP20014599 911 MFALL 911 MFALL Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WP20014833 911 MFALL 911 MFALL Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WP20015333 Phone MFALL 911 MFALL 911 MFALL 911 MFALL 911 MFALL MFALL Phone 911 MFALL 911 MFALL 911 MFALL 911 MFALL M H EART 11 Medical - Overdose - Poisoning Total: 2 g 06/07/20 04:43 Medical - Overdose - 2020041615 Medical - Overdose - PoisoninWP20015310 MOVERDOSE Page 16 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes gHow Reported 06/17/20 21:11 Medical - Overdose - 2020044938 Medical - Overdose - Poisonin�VP20016497 MOVERDOSE Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral Total: 12 06/10/20 05:02 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020042516 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20015627 911 MSICK 06/04/20 06:30 MPSYC 06/12/20 12:36 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020043242 Medical - Breathing Problems WP20015887 911 MSICK 06/04/20 17:18 Medical - Sick MPSYC 06/12/20 21:59 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020043477 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20015958 911 06/05/20 16:04 Medical - Sick 2020041126 MPSYC 06/14/20 15:48 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020043985 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20016138 911 Medical - Sick 2020042860 911 MPSYC 06/16/20 03:00 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020044413 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20016308 911 911 MPSYC 06/16/20 20:02 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020044636 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20016381 911 MSICK MPSYC 06/16/20 21:32 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020044657 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20016390 911 MSICK 06/22/20 15:04 Medical - Sick MPSYC 06/16/20 22:45 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020044675 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20016400 911 06/26/20 16:45 Medical - Sick 2020047721 MPSYC 06/19/20 11:15 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020045333 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20016629 911 Medical - Sick 2020048070 911 MPSYC 06/23/20 18:08 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020046735 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20017117 911 911 MPSYC 06/27/20 15:29 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020048058 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20017541 MPSYCHhone 06/30/20 20:23 Medical - Psychiatric - 2020049089 Medical - Psychiatric - WP20017872 911 MPSYC Medical - Seizure Total: 2 06/11/20 20:22 Medical - Seizure 2020043065 MSEIZURE 06/15/20 19:27 Medical - Seizure 2020044342 Medical - Seizure WP20016282 911 MSEIZURE Medical - Sick Total: 12 06/03/20 12:50 Medical - Sick 2020040411 911 MSICK 06/04/20 06:30 Medical - Sick 2020040651 911 MSICK 06/04/20 17:18 Medical - Sick 2020040846 911 MSICK 06/05/20 16:04 Medical - Sick 2020041126 911 MSICK 06/11/20 10:52 Medical - Sick 2020042860 911 MSICK 06/12/20 22:52 Medical - Sick 2020043494 911 MSICK 06/14/20 01:23 Medical - Sick 2020043851 911 MSICK 06/21/20 20:11 Medical - Sick 2020046160 911 MSICK 06/22/20 15:04 Medical - Sick 2020046391 911 MSICK 06/26/20 16:45 Medical - Sick 2020047721 911 MSICK 06/27/20 16:25 Medical - Sick 2020048070 911 MSICK 06/30/20 04:48 Medical - Sick 2020048837 911 MSICK Medical - Stroke Total: 3 06/06/20 17:11 Medical - Stroke 2020041485 911 MSTROKE Page 17 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # 06/16/20 14:11 Medical - Stroke 2020044531 06/27/20 20:43 Medical - Stroke 2020048169 Medical - Trauma Total: 3 06/15/20 17:21 Medical - Trauma 2020044302 06/25/20 07:22 Medical - Trauma 2020047170 06/25/20 20:13 Medical - Trauma 2020047434 Medical - Unconscious - Fainting Total: 4 06/08/20 15:32 Medical - Unconscious - 2020042054 06/16/20 11:01 Medical - Unconscious - 2020044482 06/19/20 20:03 Medical - Unconscious - 2020045532 06/26/20 23:01 Medical - Unconscious - 2020047857 Medical - Unknown Total: 1 06/25/20 18:22 Medical - Unknown 2020047398 Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 911 MSTROKE 91 MSTROKEI Medical - Unknown; 911 Text Total: 1 06/26/20 15:55 Medical - Unknown: 911 2020047697 Medical - Unknown Missing Person Total: 6 06/02/20 08:55 Missing Person 2020040030 06/05/20 16:27 Missing Person 2020041134 06/07/20 17:23 Missing Person 2020041773 06/08/20 18:59 Missing Person 2020042136 06/10/20 10:39 Missing Person 2020042572 06/11/20 10:03 Missing Person 2020042846 Motorist Aid Total: 7 06/02/20 18:13 Motorist Aid 2020040211 06/05/20 12:40 Motorist Aid 2020041058 06/11/20 17:29 Motorist Aid 2020042997 06/14/20 15:28 Motorist Aid 2020043980 06/18/20 14:25 Motorist Aid 2020045099 06/25/20 12:16 Motorist Aid 2020047249 06/27/20 14:06 Motorist Aid 2020048028 Motorist Aid; MVA - No Injuries Total: 1 06/27/20 17:43 Motorist Aid; MVA - No 2020048092 911 MTRAUMA 911 MTRAUM1A MTRAUMAI MUNCONSCIOUS PhonMUNCOIOUS MUNCONSCIOUS MUNCONSCIOUS MUNKNOWN WP20017498 Phone MUNKNOWN; Juvenile - Complaint WP20014725 Phone MISSPEp Missing Person WP20015128 MISSPE Rhone Juvenile - Runaway WP20015366 hone MISSPER Missing Person WP20015509 hone MISSPER Juvenile - Complaint WP20015642 MISSPER Check Welfare WP20015747 hone MISSPER ne MOTORAID Motorist Aid WP20015094 MOTORAI D ne MOTORAID ne MOTORAID MOTORAI D ne MOTORAID ne MOTORAID Phone MOTORAID; MVA Page 18 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported MVA - Hit & Run Total: 7 06/01/20 14:57 MVA - Hit & Run 2020039771 Citizen Aid WP20014644 2020048062 MVA - Injuries WP20017542 Phone MVAINJ911 06/30/20 16:00 MVA - Injuries 2020049011 MVA - Injuries WP20017856 MVAHR 06/01/20 16:06 MVA - Hit & Run 2020039802 MVA - No Injuries 2020041102 911 WP20015109 911 MVAHR 06/05/20 13:35 MVA - Hit & Run 2020041080 MVA - Hit & Run WP20015101 MVA - No Injuries 2020041224 MVA - No Injuries WP20015165 MVAHR 06/07/20 13:40 MVA - Hit & Run 2020041697 MVA - Hit & Run WP20015339 06/07/20 17:20 MVA - No Injuries 2020041771 MVA - No Injuries WP20015364 MVAHR 06/14/20 19:54 MVA - Hit & Run 2020044058 MVA - Hit & Run WP20016170 911 MVA 06/08/20 21:05 MVA - No Injuries 2020042168 MVAHR 06/22/20 08:15 MVA - Hit & Run 2020046262 MVA - Hit & Run WP20016947 MVA 06/09/20 06:49 MVAHR 06/24/20 19:39 MVA - Hit & Run 2020047073 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017235 MVA MVAHR MVA - Injuries Total: 3 06/23/20 15:03 MVA- Injuries 2020046680 MVA- No Injuries WP20017107 2020040818 MVAINJ911 06/27/20 15:46 MVA - Injuries 2020048062 MVA - Injuries WP20017542 Phone MVAINJ911 06/30/20 16:00 MVA - Injuries 2020049011 MVA - Injuries WP20017856 MVAINJ MVA - No Injuries Total: 19 06/04/20 16:07 MVA - No Injuries 2020040818 MVA - No Injuries WP20015005 Phone MVA 06/05/20 14:56 MVA - No Injuries 2020041102 MVA - No Injuries WP20015109 911 MVA 06/05/20 21:03 MVA - No Injuries 2020041224 MVA - No Injuries WP20015165 MVA 06/07/20 17:20 MVA - No Injuries 2020041771 MVA - No Injuries WP20015364 911 MVA 06/08/20 21:05 MVA - No Injuries 2020042168 MVA - No Injuries WP20015522 MVA 06/09/20 06:49 MVA - No Injuries 2020042241 MVA - No Injuries WP20015542 Phone MVA 06/13/20 12:44 MVA - No Injuries 2020043634 MVA - No Injuries WP20016008 MVA 06/13/20 15:02 MVA - No Injuries 2020043670 911 MVA 06/19/20 16:45 MVA - No Injuries 2020045438 MVA - No Injuries WP20016671 911 MVA 06/22/20 20:21 MVA - No Injuries 2020046485 MVA - No Injuries WP20017036 Officer MVA 06/24/20 08:44 MVA - No Injuries 2020046846 MVA - No Injuries WP20017157 MVA 06/25/20 13:39 MVA - No Injuries 2020047284 MVA - No Injuries WP20017304 MVA 06/25/20 13:58 MVA - No Injuries 2020047288 MVA - No Injuries WP20017306 911 MVA 06/26/20 16:41 MVA - No Injuries 2020047719 MVA - No Injuries WP20017422 911 MVA 06/27/20 11:46 MVA - No Injuries 2020047980 MVA - No Injuries WP20017517 MVA 06/27/20 16:17 MVA - No Injuries 2020048069 MVA - Hit & Run WP20017545 MVA 06/29/20 15:42 MVA - No Injuries 2020048683 MVA - No Injuries WP20017744 911 MVA 06/29/20 20:35 MVA - No Injuries 2020048771 MVA - No Injuries WP20017774 MVA 06/30/20 17:06 MVA - No Injuries 2020049038 MVA - No Injuries WP20017861 MVA Page 19 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Neighborhood Dispute Total: 4 WP20016690 Parking 06/01/20 22:45 Neighborhood Dispute 2020039948 Theft - From Vehicle 06/13/20 21:15 Neighborhood Dispute 2020043792 Neighborhood Dispute 06/19/20 19:45 Neighborhood Dispute 2020045522 Neighborhood Dispute 06/28/20 12:29 Neighborhood Dispute 2020048377 Neighborhood Dispute Noise Total: 2 2020048729 06/13/20 22:17 Noise 2020043815 Noise 06/20/20 01:45 Noise 2020045646 Noise Off -Road Vehicle Complaint Total: 2 Case Number Codes How Reported WP20014695 Parking 2020042688 NEIGHBDISP WP20016070 NEIGHBDISP WP20016690 Parking 06/20/2010:41 NEIGHBDISP WP20017647 Parking 06/22/20 06:19 NEIGHBDISP WP20016076 NOISE WP20016732 NOISE 06/07/20 20:46 Off -Road Vehicle 2020041824 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint WP20015390 ORV Phone 06/21/20 16:22 Off -Road Vehicle 2020046102 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint WP20016894 ORV Phone Ordinance Violation Total: 3 06/04/20 08:23 Ordinance Violation 2020040683 Ordinance Violation 06/16/20 09:33 Ordinance Violation 2020044452 Ordinance Violation 06/21/20 14:51 Ordinance Violation 2020046075 Ordinance Violation Parking Total: 4 06/10/2016:50 Parking 2020042688 Parking 06/12/2013:12 Parking 2020043259 Parking 06/20/2010:41 Parking 2020045692 Parking 06/22/20 06:19 Parking 2020046244 Parking Phone Call Total: 2 06/05/20 12:48 Phone Call 2020041064 06/29/20 18:35 Phone Call 2020048729 Phone Call; Info Total: 1 06/01/20 16:31 Phone Call; Info Probation Check Total: 5 06/03/20 21:24 Probation Check 06/10/20 17:16 Probation Check 06/19/20 19:10 Probation Check 06/19/20 19:31 Probation Check 06/25/20 14:55 Probation Check 2020039813 2020040578 2020042698 2020045506 2020045520 2020047318 W PRK20014955 ORDINANCE WP20016321 ORDINANCE WP20016879 ORDINANCE WP20015689 PARKING WP20015892 PARKING WP20016748 PARKING WP20016943 PARKING PH Other PH Other Other PH; INFO PROB Officer PROB Officer Officer PROB PROB Officer PROB Officer Page 20 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported Public Works - Utilities Total: 1 06/10/20 15:31 Public Works - Utilities 2020042656 Public Works - Utilities WP20015675 911 PWUTIL Repossession Total: 1 06/29/20 02:42 Repossession 2020048579 REPO Residential General Alarm Total: 4 06/03/20 12:30 Residential General 2020040401 Residential General Alarm WP20014860 Phone SIA 06/02/2019:02 SIA Area Watch 2020040226 DUI WP20014800 ALARM 06/14/20 20:20 Residential General 2020044062 Residential General Alarm WP20016172 Phone SIA 06/09/20 06:34 SIA Area Watch ALARM 06/20/20 07:33 Residential General 2020045658 Residential General Alarm WP20016736 SIA Area Watch Phone SIA ALARM SIA Area Watch 06/25/20 00:44 Residential General 2020047133 Residential General Alarm WP20017254 SIA Phone SIA Area Watch 2020042642 ALARM SIA Residential Medical Alarm Total: 3 06/12/20 10:54 Residential Medical 2020043200 Residential Medical Alarm WP20015868 Phone ALARM 06/15/20 14:05 Residential Medical 2020044232 Residential Medical Alarm WP20016234 Phone ALARM 06/30/20 09:56 Residential Medical 2020048883 Residential Medical Alarm WP20017809 Phone ALARM Robbery Total: 1 06/17/2002:06 Robbery 2020044702 Threats WP20016408 11 ROBBER Search Warrant Total: 2 06/16/20 07:54 Search Warrant 2020044430 Search Warrant WCID20016314 Officer SEARCH WT 06/24/20 19:07 Search Warrant 2020047059 Search Warrant WCID20017226 Officer SEARCH WT SIA Area Watch Total: 7 06/02/2011:10 SIA Area Watch 2020040071 SIA 06/02/2019:02 SIA Area Watch 2020040226 DUI WP20014800 SIA 06/04/2010:31 SIA Area Watch 2020040703 SIA 06/09/20 06:34 SIA Area Watch 2020042238 SIA 06/09/20 14:48 SIA Area Watch 2020042366 SIA 06/10/20 09:12 SIA Area Watch 2020042551 SIA 06/10/20 15:15 SIA Area Watch 2020042642 SIA SIA Business Walk Through Total: 1 06/12/20 11:46 SIA Business Walk 2020043220 SIA SIA City Council - City Hall Total: 2 06/08/20 17:30 SIA City Council - City 2020042108 SIA Officer 06/22/20 17:29 SIA City Council - City 2020046441 SIA Officer Page 21 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident SIA Community Presentation Total: 2 06/03/20 18:53 SIA Community 2020040524 06/10/20 16:53 SIA Community 2020042690 SIA Other Total: 3 06/04/20 13:03 SIA Other 06/14/20 12:25 SIA Other 06/17/20 15:03 SIA Other SIA Parks Total: 11 06/02/20 01:26 SIA Parks 06/02/20 14:05 SIA Parks 06/04/20 08:16 SIA Parks 06/05/20 11:35 SIA Parks 06/06/20 10:33 SIA Parks 06/06/20 11:06 SIA Parks 06/07/20 10:10 SIA Parks 06/11/20 10:45 SIA Parks 06/23/20 15:11 SIA Parks 06/24/20 01:39 SIA Parks 06/25/20 08:16 SIA Parks SIA School Check Total: 1 06/24/20 11:31 SIA School Check SIA Water Patrol Total: 1 06/30/20 10:36 SIA Water Patrol Sign - Signal Repair Total: 9 06/02/20 18:39 Sign - Signal Repair 06/12/20 20:54 Sign - Signal Repair 06/13/20 07:27 Sign - Signal Repair 06/13/20 07:29 Sign - Signal Repair 06/13/20 17:27 Sign - Signal Repair 06/13/20 21:14 Sign - Signal Repair 06/13/20 21:49 Sign - Signal Repair 06/14/20 22:33 Sign - Signal Repair 2020040745 2020043938 2020044828 2020039971 2020040137 2020040681 2020041037 2020041353 2020041368 2020041648 2020042858 2020046684 2020046815 2020047178 2020046898 2020048895 2020040218 2020043448 2020043558 2020043560 2020043728 2020043791 2020043805 2020044094 Case Number Codes How Reported SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIGNREPfficer SIGNREP11 SIGNREPhone SIGNREPhone SIGNREP11 SIGNREPfficer SIGNREPhone SIGNREPhone Page 22 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call 06/18/20 12:20 Sign - Signal Repair Soliciting Total: 3 06/02/2012:53 Soliciting 06/02/2014:17 Soliciting 06/18/2011:14 Soliciting Squad Damage Total: 2 06/09/20 22:18 Squad Damage 06/16/20 14:34 Squad Damage Stolen - Property Total: 1 06/22/20 11:21 Stolen - Property CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 2020045066 Suspicious - 2020039972 hone Suspicious - 2020040332 06/03/20 18:55 S I G N REP 2020040111 Soliciting WP20014757 hone 06/04/20 02:32 Suspicious - 2020040637 SOLICIT 2020040141 Soliciting WP20014771 hone 2020041540 06/09/20 18:10 Suspicious - SOLICIT 2020045047 Soliciting WP20016526 hone Suspicious - 2020043526 06/13/20 06:12 SOLICIT 2020042485 Squad Damage WP20015609 2020044347 06/16/20 14:13 Suspicious - 2020044533 SOD -DAMAGE 2020044536 Squad Damage WP20016361 Suspicious - 2020046172 06/22/20 09:49 Suspicious - SOD -DAMAGE 2020046306 Stolen - Property WP20016965 STOLPROne P Suspicious - Circumstances Total: 28 06/01/20 16:46 Suspicious - 2020039819 06/02/20 01:30 Suspicious - 2020039972 06/03/20 07:09 Suspicious - 2020040332 06/03/20 18:55 Suspicious - 2020040526 06/03/20 18:56 Suspicious - 2020040527 06/04/20 02:32 Suspicious - 2020040637 06/04/20 08:44 Suspicious - 2020040686 06/06/20 20:20 Suspicious - 2020041540 06/09/20 18:10 Suspicious - 2020042414 06/10/20 01:01 Suspicious - 2020042509 06/13/20 00:44 Suspicious - 2020043526 06/13/20 06:12 Suspicious - 2020043556 06/15/20 19:47 Suspicious - 2020044347 06/16/20 14:13 Suspicious - 2020044533 06/21/20 14:53 Suspicious - 2020046077 06/21/20 20:55 Suspicious - 2020046172 06/22/20 09:49 Suspicious - 2020046278 06/22/20 15:09 Suspicious - 2020046393 06/23/20 01:35 Suspicious - 2020046533 06/23/20 14:35 Suspicious - 2020046669 06/24/20 22:54 Suspicious - 2020047118 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20014663 91 SUSPCIRC DUI - MVA WP20014706 C SUSPCIRhe Disorderly WP20014829 SUSPCIPCon Suspicious - Circumstances WP20014904 SUSPCIg911 RC Stolen - Vehicle WP20014905 SUSPCIRC Suspicious - Circumstances WP20014942 SUSPCI911 RC Suspicious - Circumstances WP20014958 SUSPCIPCne Suspicious - Circumstances WP20015276 Phone SUSPCIPhe Suspicious - Circumstances WP20015593 SUSPCIPCon Suspicious - Circumstances WP20015623 SUSPCIgPhone Suspicious - Circumstances WP20015974 C SUSPCIRhone Suspicious - Circumstances WP20015986 SUSPCIPC Suspicious - Circumstances WP20016284 SUSPCIPCne Civil Complaint WP20016351 Phone Phe SUSPCIRC Commercial Burglary WP20016881 SUSPCIPCon Suspicious - Circumstances WP20016918 SUSPCI911 RC Suspicious - Circumstances WP20016953 Phone Phe SUSPCIRC Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017004 SUSPCIPCon Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017052 SUSPCI911 RC Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017103 Phone Phe SUSPCIRC Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017252 SUSPCIPCon Page 23 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/25/20 15:57 Suspicious - 2020047346 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017319 Ph Phone 2020040266 06/03/20 21:17 Suspicious - Person - 2020040574 06/03/20 21:22 SUSPCIRC 06/26/20 16:15 Suspicious - 2020047706 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017420 he 2020040907 06/08/20 01:13 Suspicious - Person - 2020041872 06/09/20 15:21 SUSPCIRCon 06/27/20 07:31 Suspicious - 2020047920 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017500 Suspicious - Person - 2020043463 06/14/20 02:44 Suspicious - Person - 2020043861 06/14/20 13:54 SUSPCIRCne 06/29/20 12:24 Suspicious - 2020048638 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017726 Suspicious - Person - 2020045115 06/18/20 21:06 Suspicious - Person - 2020045215 06/20/20 23:28 SUSPCIRCne 06/30/20 01:25 Suspicious - 2020048821 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017788 Suspicious - Person - 2020046813 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20016837 SUSPPVhone SUSPCI911 RC 06/30/20 11:33 Suspicious - 2020048924 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017821 hne Phone SUSPPV SUSPCIRC 06/30/20 23:25 Suspicious - 2020049130 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20017885 SUSPCIRC Suspicious - Circumstances; Court Order Violation Total: 1 06/11/20 08:18 Suspicious - 2020042829 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20015740 11 SUSPCI C; COV Suspicious - Circumstances; Dispatch - CAD - Addressing Problems Total: 1 06/06/20 22:28 Suspicious - 2020041573 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20015290 Phone SUSPCIRC; DISPCAD Suspicious - Person - Vehicle Total: 25 06/01/20 14:27 Suspicious - Person - 2020039763 06/01/20 16:18 Suspicious - Person - 2020039806 06/02/20 11:10 Suspicious - Person - 2020040072 06/02/20 21:50 Suspicious - Person - 2020040266 06/03/20 21:17 Suspicious - Person - 2020040574 06/03/20 21:22 Suspicious - Person - 2020040577 06/04/20 15:19 Suspicious - Person - 2020040793 06/04/20 20:43 Suspicious - Person - 2020040907 06/08/20 01:13 Suspicious - Person - 2020041872 06/09/20 15:21 Suspicious - Person - 2020042378 06/10/20 20:20 Suspicious - Person - 2020042762 06/12/20 21:34 Suspicious - Person - 2020043463 06/14/20 02:44 Suspicious - Person - 2020043861 06/14/20 13:54 Suspicious - Person - 2020043958 06/17/20 19:05 Suspicious - Person - 2020044908 06/18/20 15:15 Suspicious - Person - 2020045115 06/18/20 21:06 Suspicious - Person - 2020045215 06/20/20 23:28 Suspicious - Person - 2020045929 06/21/20 19:32 Suspicious - Person - 2020046149 06/24/20 00:58 Suspicious - Person - 2020046813 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20014641 SUSPPVhone Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20014660 SUSPPVPhone Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20014739 SUSPPV 11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20014808 SUSPPVPhone Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20014921 SUSPPVg11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20014923 11 SUSPPV Extra Patrol WP20014994 SUSPPV911 SUSPPVg11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20015410 11 SUSPPV Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20015581 SUSPPVhone Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20015711 SUSPPVPhone Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20015952 11 SUSPPV Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20016092 SUSPPV911 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20016127 SUSPPVg11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20016477 SUSPPV 11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20016555 SUSPPV11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20016586 SUSPPVhone Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20016837 SUSPPVhone Drugs WP20016910 SUSPPV911 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017148 11 SUSPPV Page 24 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # 06/24/20 14:37 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017780 Suspicious - Person - 2020046956 06/29/20 16:25 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017803 Suspicious - Person - 2020048695 06/29/20 21:41 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017874 Suspicious - Person - 2020048794 06/30/20 08:50 WP20015676 Suspicious - Person - 2020048869 06/30/20 20:31 WP20015903 Suspicious - Person - 2020049093 Final Incident Case Number Codes gHow Reported Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017195 SUSPPV 11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017748 Officer 2020039676 SUSPP Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017780 Phone Phone SUSPPV11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017803 SUSPPVhone Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017874 THEFT 2020042653 SUSPPV11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle; Dispatch - CAD - Addressing Problems Total: 1 06/19/20 12:33 Suspicious - Person - 2020045358 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20016641 Phoe SUSPPV; DIWPCAD Theft Total: 12 06/01/20 09:43 Theft 2020039676 Theft WP20014607 Phone Phone THEFTVEH 06/10/20 15:29 THEFT 2020042653 06/12/2014:06 WP20015676 Theft 2020043282 Theft WP20015903 911 THEFTVEH 06/20/20 01:59 Theft - From Vehicle 2020045649 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20016734 THEFT 06/13/20 00:02 Theft 2020043518 Theft WP20015969 Theft - From Vehicle Phone Civil Complaint WP20017087 Phone THEFT 06/13/20 04:30 06/23/20 16:44 Theft 2020043552 Theft WP20015984 911 THEFTA10 06/24/20 12:18 THEFT 2020046911 06/13/2018:29 WP20017180 Theft 2020043745 Theft WP20016050 Theft - From Vehicle Phone Phone THEFT 06/28/20 10:14 06/15/2015:33 2020048340 Theft 2020044257 Theft WP20016245 Phone THEFTVEH 06/29/20 17:00 Theft - From Vehicle 2020048702 THEFT WP20017750 06/17/2012:29 Theft - Gas Drive Off Total: 1 Theft 2020044792 Theft WP20016437 06/28/20 01:22 Phone 2020048250 911 THEFT 06/19/2011:47 THEFTGAS Theft 2020045347 Theft WP20016634 Phone THEFT 06/21/2015:09 Theft 2020046086 Theft WP20016885 Phone THEFT 06/22/20 13:35 Theft 2020046357 Commercial Burglary WP20016988 Phone THEFT 06/29/2013:53 Theft 2020048658 Theft WP20017734 Phone THEFT 06/29/2014:11 Theft 2020048662 Theft WP20017737 Phone THEFT Theft - From Vehicle Total: 9 06/01/20 13:48 Theft - From Vehicle 2020039746 Citizen Aid WP20014635 Phone THEFTVEH 06/10/20 15:29 Theft - From Vehicle 2020042653 Theft - From Vehicle WP20015676 Phone THEFTVEH 06/20/20 01:59 Theft - From Vehicle 2020045649 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20016734 911 THEFTVEH 06/23/20 11:34 Theft - From Vehicle 2020046619 Civil Complaint WP20017087 Phone THEFTVPh 06/23/20 16:44 Theft - From Vehicle 2020046714 Theft - From Vehicle WP20017113 THEFTA10 06/24/20 12:18 Theft - From Vehicle 2020046911 Theft - From Vehicle WP20017180 THEFTVhHone 06/24/20 17:15 Theft - From Vehicle 2020047011 Theft - From Vehicle WP20017210 Phone THEFTVEH 06/28/20 10:14 Theft - From Vehicle 2020048340 Theft - From Vehicle WP20017635 Phone THEFTVEH 06/29/20 17:00 Theft - From Vehicle 2020048702 Theft - From Vehicle WP20017750 THEFTVpH ne Theft - Gas Drive Off Total: 1 06/28/20 01:22 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2020048250 911 THEFTGAS Page 25 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Theft - Identity Theft Total: 2 06/05/20 15:40 Theft - Identity Theft 2020041118 Theft - Identity Theft 06/11/20 08:12 Theft - Identity Theft 2020042827 Theft - Identity Theft Case Number Codes How Reported WP20015120 THEFTIDhone WP20015739 THEFTIDhone Theft; Search Warrant Total: 1 06/04/20 18:18 Theft; Search Warrant 2020040872 Stolen - Vehicle WP20015022 Phone THEFT; SEARCH WT Theft - Shoplifting Total: 12 06/01/20 14:12 Theft - Shoplifting 2020039755 Theft - Shoplifting WP20014638 Phone 911 THEFTSHOne 06/05/20 13:47 Theft - Shoplifting 2020041084 Suspicious - Circumstances WP20015104 911 WP20014658 Phone THEFTSHOne 06/11/20 13:19 Theft - Shoplifting 2020042910 Theft - Shoplifting WP20015773 Phone 2020040016 Traffic - Complaint WP20014722 Phone THEFTS%ope 06/15/20 18:28 Theft - Shoplifting 2020044323 Theft - Shoplifting WP20016272 Phone 06/02/20 14:14 Traffic - Complaint 2020040140 Traffic - Complaint WP20014770 THEFTS 06/15/20 20:35 Theft - Shoplifting 2020044359 Theft - Shoplifting WP20016289 911 T THEFTSHOP 06/16/20 10:11 Theft - Shoplifting 2020044462 Theft - Shoplifting WP20016326 THEFTS%ope 06/24/20 13:13 Theft - Shoplifting 2020046927 Theft - Shoplifting WP20017188 THEFTSHOne 06/25/20 13:37 Theft - Shoplifting 2020047282 Theft - Shoplifting WP20017303 THEFTSHOne 06/26/20 16:09 Theft - Shoplifting 2020047702 Theft - Shoplifting WP20017419 THEFTS%ope 06/28/20 11:40 Theft - Shoplifting 2020048362 Theft - Shoplifting WP20017642 THEFTSHOne 06/30/20 09:25 Theft - Shoplifting 2020048875 Theft - Shoplifting WP20017805 THEFTSHOP 06/30/20 12:52 Theft - Shoplifting 2020048945 Theft - Shoplifting WP20017829 THEFTS%ope Threats Total: 6 06/01/2015:04 Threats 2020039775 Threats WP20014647 Phone 911 THREATS 06/05/20 08:59 Threats 2020040995 Threats WP20015070 911 WP20014658 Phone THREATS 06/06/2011:01 Threats 2020041365 Threats WP20015211 Phone 2020040016 Traffic - Complaint WP20014722 Phone THREATS 06/11/20 02:09 Threats 2020042806 Threats WP20015729 Phone 06/02/20 14:14 Traffic - Complaint 2020040140 Traffic - Complaint WP20014770 THREATS 06/13/2019:45 Threats 2020043773 Threats WP20016061 911 T THREATS 06/20/20 20:47 Threats 2020045874 Neighborhood Dispute WP20016818 THREATSone Tow Total: 1 06/15/20 09:03 Tow 2020044137 Phone TOW Traffic - Complaint Total: 30 06/01/20 15:47 Traffic - Complaint 2020039794 Traffic - Complaint WP20014655 911 T 06/01/20 16:08 Traffic - Complaint 2020039804 Traffic - Complaint WP20014658 Phone T 06/02/20 08:05 Traffic - Complaint 2020040016 Traffic - Complaint WP20014722 Phone T 06/02/20 14:14 Traffic - Complaint 2020040140 Traffic - Complaint WP20014770 Phone T Page 26 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/02/20 23:00 Traffic - Complaint 2020040276 Traffic - Complaint WP20014813 911 T 06/03/20 11:21 Traffic - Complaint 2020040383 Traffic - Complaint WP20014850 911 T 06/03/20 14:24 Traffic - Complaint 2020040446 Traffic - Complaint WP20014871 Phone T 06/03/20 20:42 Traffic - Complaint 2020040559 Assault WP20014916 911 T 06/04/20 22:28 Traffic - Complaint 2020040934 Traffic - Complaint WP20015047 Phone T 06/05/20 09:14 Traffic - Complaint 2020041000 Phone T 06/06/20 13:16 Traffic - Complaint 2020041410 Traffic - Complaint WP20015226 911 T 06/06/20 14:07 Traffic - Complaint 2020041429 Traffic - Complaint WP20015234 Phone T 06/07/20 00:52 Traffic - Complaint 2020041595 Traffic - Complaint BP20005061 911 T 06/08/20 07:59 Traffic - Complaint 2020041905 Traffic - Complaint WP20015422 Phone T 06/08/20 13:47 Traffic - Complaint 2020042025 Traffic - Complaint WP20015472 Phone T 06/08/20 19:03 Traffic - Complaint 2020042140 Traffic - Complaint WP20015508 Phone T 06/08/20 21:23 Traffic - Complaint 2020042175 Traffic - Complaint WP20015524 911 T 06/09/20 20:09 Traffic - Complaint 2020042444 Traffic - Complaint WP20015601 911 T 06/10/20 17:40 Traffic - Complaint 2020042703 Phone T 06/12/20 12:50 Traffic - Complaint 2020043249 Traffic - Complaint WP20015890 911 T 06/16/20 16:08 Traffic - Complaint 2020044566 Traffic - Complaint WP20016363 Phone T 06/17/20 22:25 Traffic - Complaint 2020044957 911 T 06/19/20 17:05 Traffic - Complaint 2020045451 Traffic - Complaint WP20016675 Phone T 06/19/20 19:00 Traffic - Complaint 2020045502 Traffic - Complaint WP20016688 911 T 06/24/20 17:13 Traffic - Complaint 2020047010 Traffic - Complaint WP20017208 Phone T 06/25/20 21:40 Traffic - Complaint 2020047460 Traffic - Complaint WP20017349 911 T 06/26/20 17:18 Traffic - Complaint 2020047733 Traffic - Complaint WP20017428 911 T 06/27/20 15:22 Traffic - Complaint 2020048055 Traffic - Complaint WP20017540 Phone T 06/27/20 18:48 Traffic - Complaint 2020048120 Traffic - Complaint WP20017558 Phone T 06/30/20 19:22 Traffic - Complaint 2020049074 Traffic - Complaint WP20017869 Phone T Traffic - Hazard Total: 1 06/04/20 14:07 Traffic - Hazard 2020040766 Traffic - Hazard WP20014984 Phone THAZARD Traffic Stop Total: 209 06/01/20 13:39 Traffic Stop 2020039744 Officer TS 06/01/20 13:55 Traffic Stop 2020039749 Traffic Stop WP20014636 Officer TS 06/01/20 14:22 Traffic Stop 2020039761 Traffic Stop WP20014640 Officer TS Page 27 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/01/2014:36 Traffic Stop 2020039765 Officer TS 06/01/2019:59 Traffic Stop 2020039893 Officer TS 06/02/20 10:48 Traffic Stop 2020040063 Officer TS 06/02/2012:22 Traffic Stop 2020040099 Officer TS 06/02/20 17:15 Traffic Stop 2020040191 Traffic Stop WP20014787 Officer TS 06/02/20 17:35 Traffic Stop 2020040195 Officer TS 06/02/2017:51 Traffic Stop 2020040201 Officer TS 06/02/2019:09 Traffic Stop 2020040230 Officer TS 06/02/20 23:00 Traffic Stop 2020040275 Officer TS 06/03/20 13:14 Traffic Stop 2020040425 Traffic Stop WP20014863 Officer TS 06/03/20 13:46 Traffic Stop 2020040433 Officer TS 06/03/2016:39 Traffic Stop 2020040487 Officer TS 06/04/20 00:59 Traffic Stop 2020040622 Traffic Stop WP20014937 Officer TS 06/04/20 01:44 Traffic Stop 2020040630 Officer TS 06/04/2012:54 Traffic Stop 2020040742 Officer TS 06/04/20 15:43 Traffic Stop 2020040803 Traffic Stop WP20014998 Officer TS 06/04/20 16:19 Traffic Stop 2020040821 Officer TS 06/04/20 16:27 Traffic Stop 2020040824 Traffic Stop WP20015007 Officer TS 06/04/2016:38 Traffic Stop 2020040829 Officer TS 06/04/2017:00 Traffic Stop 2020040838 Officer TS 06/04/20 19:13 Traffic Stop 2020040890 Officer TS 06/05/20 06:55 Traffic Stop 2020040970 Officer TS 06/05/20 20:11 Traffic Stop 2020041206 Officer TS 06/05/20 22:59 Traffic Stop 2020041263 Traffic Stop WP20015180 Officer TS 06/07/20 13:54 Traffic Stop 2020041702 Officer TS 06/08/20 17:44 Traffic Stop 2020042114 Officer TS 06/09/20 07:03 Traffic Stop 2020042245 Officer TS 06/09/20 16:01 Traffic Stop 2020042389 Officer TS 06/09/20 21:53 Traffic Stop 2020042476 Officer TS 06/09/20 22:59 Traffic Stop 2020042491 Traffic Stop WP20015613 Officer TS 06/10/20 00:55 Traffic Stop 2020042507 Officer TS 06/10/20 07:33 Traffic Stop 2020042530 Officer TS 06/10/20 11:52 Traffic Stop 2020042588 Officer TS Page 28 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/10/20 12:30 Traffic Stop 2020042597 Traffic Stop WP20015654 Officer TS 06/10/20 12:52 Traffic Stop 2020042604 Officer TS 06/10/20 16:42 Traffic Stop 2020042683 Officer TS 06/10/20 18:27 Traffic Stop 2020042721 Officer TS 06/10/20 18:51 Traffic Stop 2020042731 Officer TS 06/10/20 18:52 Traffic Stop 2020042732 Traffic Stop WP20015697 Officer TS 06/10/20 19:07 Traffic Stop 2020042737 Traffic Stop WP20015700 Officer TS 06/10/20 19:26 Traffic Stop 2020042743 Officer TS 06/10/20 20:19 Traffic Stop 2020042761 Officer TS 06/11/20 10:58 Traffic Stop 2020042862 Traffic Stop WP20015754 Officer TS 06/11/20 11:05 Traffic Stop 2020042866 Officer TS 06/11/20 11:22 Traffic Stop 2020042872 Officer TS 06/11/20 11:46 Traffic Stop 2020042875 Traffic Stop WP20015760 Officer TS 06/11/20 12:56 Traffic Stop 2020042903 Officer TS 06/11/20 13:06 Traffic Stop 2020042904 Traffic Stop WP20015771 Officer TS 06/11/20 13:40 Traffic Stop 2020042918 Traffic Stop WP20015776 Officer TS 06/11/20 14:03 Traffic Stop 2020042926 Officer TS 06/11/20 14:37 Traffic Stop 2020042935 Officer TS 06/11/20 15:39 Traffic Stop 2020042956 Officer TS 06/11/20 15:58 Traffic Stop 2020042966 Traffic Stop WP20015794 Officer TS 06/11/20 16:11 Traffic Stop 2020042968 Officer TS 06/11/20 16:36 Traffic Stop 2020042982 Officer TS 06/11/20 16:49 Traffic Stop 2020042985 Officer TS 06/11/20 18:13 Traffic Stop 2020043013 Traffic Stop WP20015809 Officer TS 06/11/20 18:24 Traffic Stop 2020043020 Officer TS 06/11/20 19:30 Traffic Stop 2020043047 Officer TS 06/11/20 19:44 Traffic Stop 2020043050 Drugs WP20015819 Officer TS 06/11/20 22:10 Traffic Stop 2020043094 Officer TS 06/12/20 10:47 Traffic Stop 2020043197 Traffic Stop WP20015866 Officer TS 06/12/20 12:13 Traffic Stop 2020043227 Traffic Stop WP20015881 Officer TS 06/12/20 12:14 Traffic Stop 2020043229 Officer TS 06/12/20 12:22 Traffic Stop 2020043235 Officer TS 06/12/20 12:23 Traffic Stop 2020043236 Traffic Stop WP20015884 Officer TS Page 29 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/12/20 16:09 Traffic Stop 2020043329 Officer TS 06/12/20 19:17 Traffic Stop 2020043406 Officer TS 06/13/20 02:30 Traffic Stop 2020043541 Officer TS 06/13/20 03:02 Traffic Stop 2020043546 Officer TS 06/13/20 12:20 Traffic Stop 2020043619 Officer TS 06/13/20 12:37 Traffic Stop 2020043629 Officer TS 06/13/20 12:42 Traffic Stop 2020043633 Officer TS 06/13/20 13:17 Traffic Stop 2020043642 Officer TS 06/13/20 13:57 Traffic Stop 2020043652 Traffic Stop WP20016015 Officer TS 06/13/20 14:07 Traffic Stop 2020043653 Traffic Stop WP20016016 Officer TS 06/13/20 14:17 Traffic Stop 2020043654 Traffic Stop WP20016017 Officer TS 06/13/20 14:38 Traffic Stop 2020043660 Officer TS 06/13/20 18:26 Traffic Stop 2020043743 Officer TS 06/13/20 18:56 Traffic Stop 2020043756 Officer TS 06/13/20 19:09 Traffic Stop 2020043762 Officer TS 06/13/20 19:50 Traffic Stop 2020043774 Officer TS 06/14/20 08:58 Traffic Stop 2020043884 Officer TS 06/14/20 10:34 Traffic Stop 2020043913 Officer TS 06/14/20 10:44 Traffic Stop 2020043917 Officer TS 06/14/20 11:42 Traffic Stop 2020043927 Traffic Stop WP20016118 Officer TS 06/15/20 07:56 Traffic Stop 2020044126 Officer TS 06/15/20 21:16 Traffic Stop 2020044368 Officer TS 06/15/20 21:57 Traffic Stop 2020044376 Officer TS 06/15/20 22:55 Traffic Stop 2020044391 Officer TS 06/16/20 02:12 Traffic Stop 2020044411 Traffic Stop WP20016307 Officer TS 06/16/20 02:17 Traffic Stop 2020044412 Officer TS 06/17/20 13:41 Traffic Stop 2020044807 Officer TS 06/17/20 13:48 Traffic Stop 2020044808 Officer TS 06/17/20 14:48 Traffic Stop 2020044823 Officer TS 06/17/20 16:35 Traffic Stop 2020044852 Officer TS 06/17/20 16:38 Traffic Stop 2020044853 Officer TS 06/17/20 18:16 Traffic Stop 2020044895 Traffic Stop WP20016470 Officer TS 06/17/20 18:29 Traffic Stop 2020044899 Traffic Stop WP20016473 Officer TS Page 30 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/18/20 01:12 Traffic Stop 2020044978 Officer TS 06/18/20 16:50 Traffic Stop 2020045154 Officer TS 06/18/20 19:12 Traffic Stop 2020045193 Officer TS 06/18/20 19:22 Traffic Stop 2020045198 Officer TS 06/18/20 19:36 Traffic Stop 2020045201 Officer TS 06/18/20 19:38 Traffic Stop 2020045203 Officer TS 06/18/20 19:44 Traffic Stop 2020045206 Officer TS 06/19/20 07:44 Traffic Stop 2020045273 Traffic Stop WP20016611 Officer TS 06/19/20 14:50 Traffic Stop 2020045395 Officer TS 06/19/20 17:46 Traffic Stop 2020045466 Traffic Stop WP20016678 Officer TS 06/19/20 17:51 Traffic Stop 2020045467 Officer TS 06/19/20 21:12 Traffic Stop 2020045558 Officer TS 06/20/20 01:37 Traffic Stop 2020045642 Officer TS 06/20/2014:00 Traffic Stop 2020045738 Officer TS 06/20/2015:24 Traffic Stop 2020045767 Officer TS 06/20/2015:26 Traffic Stop 2020045768 Officer TS 06/20/20 16:46 Traffic Stop 2020045793 Officer TS 06/20/2017:29 Traffic Stop 2020045806 Officer TS 06/20/2017:58 Traffic Stop 2020045820 Officer TS 06/20/20 18:48 Traffic Stop 2020045833 Officer TS 06/20/2019:29 Traffic Stop 2020045847 TS 06/20/20 19:40 Traffic Stop 2020045849 Traffic Stop WP20016809 Officer TS 06/21/20 01:09 Traffic Stop 2020045953 Officer TS 06/21/2010:08 Traffic Stop 2020046000 Officer TS 06/21/20 12:11 Traffic Stop 2020046027 Officer TS 06/21/2014:26 Traffic Stop 2020046065 Officer TS 06/21/20 14:48 Traffic Stop 2020046074 Officer TS 06/21/20 16:33 Traffic Stop 2020046104 Traffic Stop WP20016897 Officer TS 06/21/20 18:16 Traffic Stop 2020046127 Traffic Stop WP20016904 Officer TS 06/22/20 10:54 Traffic Stop 2020046293 Traffic Stop WP20016958 Officer TS 06/22/2011:06 Traffic Stop 2020046300 Officer TS 06/22/20 11:15 Traffic Stop 2020046302 Officer TS 06/22/2011:21 Traffic Stop 2020046305 Officer TS Page 31 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/22/20 22:57 Traffic Stop 2020046516 Drugs WP20017049 Officer TS 06/23/20 09:10 Traffic Stop 2020046568 Traffic Stop WP20017067 Officer TS 06/23/2017:21 Traffic Stop 2020046721 Officer TS 06/23/20 22:34 Traffic Stop 2020046794 Officer TS 06/23/20 23:05 Traffic Stop 2020046799 Officer TS 06/23/20 23:10 Traffic Stop 2020046800 Officer TS 06/24/20 02:07 Traffic Stop 2020046818 Officer TS 06/24/2013:53 Traffic Stop 2020046937 Officer TS 06/24/20 22:10 Traffic Stop 2020047108 Officer TS 06/24/20 22:28 Traffic Stop 2020047111 Officer TS 06/24/20 23:57 Traffic Stop 2020047128 Officer TS 06/25/20 00:12 Traffic Stop 2020047129 Officer TS 06/25/20 11:06 Traffic Stop 2020047223 Officer TS 06/25/20 11:26 Traffic Stop 2020047234 Officer TS 06/25/20 14:18 Traffic Stop 2020047298 Traffic Stop WP20017307 Officer TS 06/25/20 17:13 Traffic Stop 2020047377 Officer TS 06/25/20 18:43 Traffic Stop 2020047404 Warrant - Arrest WP20017338 Officer TS 06/25/20 21:58 Traffic Stop 2020047464 Officer TS 06/26/20 01:29 Traffic Stop 2020047520 Officer TS 06/26/20 06:22 Traffic Stop 2020047543 Officer TS 06/26/20 06:33 Traffic Stop 2020047545 Officer TS 06/26/20 12:43 Traffic Stop 2020047636 Officer TS 06/26/20 14:35 Traffic Stop 2020047668 Traffic Stop WP20017408 Officer TS 06/26/2016:58 Traffic Stop 2020047726 Officer TS 06/26/20 18:31 Traffic Stop 2020047765 DUI WP20017441 Officer TS 06/26/20 19:10 Traffic Stop 2020047784 Drugs WP20017448 Officer TS 06/26/20 20:31 Traffic Stop 2020047802 Warrant - Arrest WP20017458 Officer TS 06/26/20 20:55 Traffic Stop 2020047810 Officer TS 06/26/20 21:46 Traffic Stop 2020047825 Officer TS 06/26/20 21:48 Traffic Stop 2020047826 Traffic Stop WP20017469 Officer TS 06/26/20 22:19 Traffic Stop 2020047841 Officer TS 06/26/20 22:20 Traffic Stop 2020047843 Officer TS 06/26/20 22:25 Traffic Stop 2020047844 Officer TS Page 32 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/26/20 22:32 Traffic Stop 2020047847 Officer TS 06/26/20 22:38 Traffic Stop 2020047849 Officer TS 06/26/20 22:41 Traffic Stop 2020047850 Officer TS 06/26/20 23:53 Traffic Stop 2020047870 Officer TS 06/27/20 12:47 Traffic Stop 2020047999 Officer TS 06/27/20 13:11 Traffic Stop 2020048009 Officer TS 06/27/20 14:20 Traffic Stop 2020048032 Officer TS 06/27/20 15:09 Traffic Stop 2020048048 Officer TS 06/27/20 17:05 Traffic Stop 2020048079 Officer TS 06/27/20 17:20 Traffic Stop 2020048082 Officer TS 06/28/20 00:09 Traffic Stop 2020048233 Officer TS 06/28/20 00:21 Traffic Stop 2020048239 Officer TS 06/28/20 01:08 Traffic Stop 2020048246 Traffic Stop WP20017611 Officer TS 06/28/20 01:57 Traffic Stop 2020048257 Officer TS 06/28/20 14:41 Traffic Stop 2020048415 Officer TS 06/28/20 15:45 Traffic Stop 2020048428 Officer TS 06/28/20 16:34 Traffic Stop 2020048449 Officer TS 06/28/20 17:07 Traffic Stop 2020048461 Traffic Stop WP20017670 Officer TS 06/28/20 17:37 Traffic Stop 2020048467 Officer TS 06/28/20 18:13 Traffic Stop 2020048480 Officer TS 06/28/2018:20 Traffic Stop 2020048481 Officer TS 06/28/20 19:39 Traffic Stop 2020048502 Officer TS 06/29/20 12:56 Traffic Stop 2020048646 Officer TS 06/29/20 13:12 Traffic Stop 2020048651 Traffic Stop WP20017730 Officer TS 06/29/20 13:27 Traffic Stop 2020048654 Officer TS 06/29/20 14:14 Traffic Stop 2020048664 Officer TS 06/29/20 14:54 Traffic Stop 2020048667 Officer TS 06/29/20 15:21 Traffic Stop 2020048679 Officer TS 06/29/20 17:07 Traffic Stop 2020048705 Traffic Stop WP20017755 Officer TS 06/29/20 17:58 Traffic Stop 2020048715 Officer TS 06/29/20 18:21 Traffic Stop 2020048718 Officer TS 06/29/20 21:11 Traffic Stop 2020048782 Traffic Stop WP20017777 Officer TS 06/30/20 02:31 Traffic Stop 2020048826 Officer TS Page 33 of 34 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 06/30/20 04:32 Traffic Stop 2020048835 Warrant - Attempt Unwanted Officer 06/20/20 12:42 WP20015841 Unwanted Person TS Person 06/30/20 08:50 Traffic Stop 2020048868 Unwanted Officer 06/24/20 18:38 2020045720 Unwanted Person TS 06/30/20 10:30 Traffic Stop 2020048894 Traffic Stop WP20017811 Officer Person WP20016852 UNWANphPhge 2020046741 TS Person 06/30/2011:56 Traffic Stop 2020048928 Officer UNWANTED 2020047048 Unwanted Person TS 06/30/20 12:05 Traffic Stop 2020048932 Traffic Stop WP20017823 Officer TS 06/30/2016:31 Traffic Stop 2020049023 Officer TS 06/30/20 21:54 Traffic Stop 2020049109 Officer TS 06/30/20 23:53 Traffic Stop 2020049139 Officer TS Traffic Stop ; Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral Total: 1 06/15/20 22:52 Traffic Stop ; Medical - 2020044390 Traffic Stop WP20016301 Officer TS; MPSYCH Trespass Total: 1 06/25/20 19:24 Trespass 2020047418 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WP20017339 TRES Phone Unwanted Person Total: 7 06/06/20 06:36 Warrant - Attempt Unwanted Person 06/12/20 01:27 Warrant - Attempt Unwanted Person 06/15/20 22:02 Warrant - Attempt Unwanted Person 06/20/20 12:42 WP20015841 Unwanted Person 06/21/20 06:23 Person Unwanted Person 06/23/20 18:28 Unwanted Person 06/24/20 18:38 2020045720 Unwanted Person Warrant - Arrest Total: 1 06/06/20 08:20 Warrant - Arrest Warrant - Attempt Total: 6 06/04/20 11:01 Warrant - Attempt 06/10/20 12:13 Warrant - Attempt 06/14/20 20:07 Warrant - Attempt 06/20/20 21:13 Warrant - Attempt 06/21/20 17:25 Warrant - Attempt 06/30/20 13:33 Warrant - Attempt Total Records: 954 2020041308 Unwanted Person WP20015195 UNWAAED 2020043131 Domestic Disturbance WP20015841 UNWANTED 2020044378 Unwanted Person WP20016298 Phone UNWANTED 2020045720 Civil Complaint WP20016756 UNWANTh 2020045972 Unwanted Person WP20016852 UNWANphPhge 2020046741 Unwanted Person WP20017119 Phone UNWANTED 2020047048 Unwanted Person WP20017224 UNWANTEune 2020041324 Warrant - Arrest 2020040714 2020042591 2020044060 2020045885 2020046117 Warrant - Arrest 2020048961 Warrant - Arrest WP20015202 WARREOTicer WATTEMPT WATTEMpPT er WATTEMPT p WATTE P�er WP20016901 WATTEMPTer WP20017836 WATTE M PT Page 34 of 34