Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 11-23-2020REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 23, 2020 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from October 26, 2020 • Regular Meeting Minutes from October 26, 2020 • Regular Meeting Minutes from November 9, 2020 • Special Meeting Minutes from November 13, 2020 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. E. Presentation of Architectural Design Award for New Fire Station F. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Holiday Hours - Thanksgiving G. Council Liaison Updates • EDA • CMRP H. Department Updates • COVID-19 Update and Discussion • City Administrator Update • Wright County Sheriff's Office Quarterly Report 2. Consent Agenda — All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-77 accepting a donation of $300 from New Ulm Brewing & Beverage for general Fire Department use E. Consideration to call for a special meeting on Wednesday, December 30, 2020 at 7:30 a.m. for approval of bills F. Consideration of approving adjustments to the MCC Part-time pay schedule to meet minimum wage requirements G. Consideration of approving City Administrator Employment Agreement between the City of Monticello and Rachel Leonard H. Consideration of authorizing expenditures in the amount of up to $7,000 for grant writing services in connection with an application to the MN -DEED Community Energy Transition Grant Program (CET) and further authorizing submittal of a CET Grant application in an amount of $500,000 I. Consideration of authorizing Fire Department to purchase new Command Vehicle (tabled on November 9, 2020) Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-82 accepting public improvements for Featherstone 4th Addition 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of amnrovina a Development Staae Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat for Edmonson Ridge, a 54 lot detached single-family subdivision. Applicant: Shawn Weinand/LSW Investments, LLC B. Consideration of adopting the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: City of Monticello 5. Adjournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, October 26, 2020 — 5 p.m. North Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Bill Fair, Jim Davidson, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Rachel Leonard, Angela Schumann, Ron Hackenmueller, Sarah Rathlisberger, Tracy Ergen, Ann Mosack, Tricia Handorff, Sara Cahill and Jennifer Schreiber 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. 2. 4 p.m. Monticello Community Center Operations Rachel Leonard, Communication & Special Projects Coordinator, presented information regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and associated impact on the Monticello Community Center. At the Council workshop on October 9, staff was directed to review additional options to reduce costs and adapt facility operations assuming long-term, ongoing impacts from COVID-19. Staff presented three options that would help reduce losses at the MCC while maintaining an adequate service level. The three options were: 1) Reduce hours for exempt staff to 32 hours per week; 2) Reduce hours for exempt staff and eliminate Aquatic Supervisor, and 3) Eliminate the Community Center Director position. The most significant cost saving is achieved by eliminating the Community Center Director position, a savings of $96,960. Staff recommended this option but noted all options presented can be implemented. Discussion ensued among City Council. It was noted that the MCC supervisors Tricia Handorff and Sara Cahill are currently handling the day-to-day operations. Although a difficult decision, Councilmembers concurred with the recommendation of staff to eliminate the Community Center Director position. Community Center Director Ann Mosack agreed that the best decision is to keep the exempt employees full time and to eliminate her position for budgetary reasons related to the ongoing pandemic. Councilmember Fair moved to eliminate the Community Center Director position following the personnel policy regarding a severance package of a 30 -day transition period and 30 -day severance pay as is standard procedure. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. 5 p.m. CMRP Engagement Workshop The Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership (CMRP) held a Round 2 in- person engagement session at the Monticello Community Center. All Councilmembers were invited to attend this event from 5 — 6 p.m., before their regular meeting. 4. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6 p.m. City Council Special Meeting Minutes October 26, 2020 Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes October 26, 2020 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, October 26, 2020 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Agenda Councilmember Davidson requested to add discussion Mielke/Jamison property and development proposals west of St. Henry Catholic Church. Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of the agenda with the addition of the above item. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Approval of Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from October 12, 2020 Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of the special meeting minutes as amended. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meeting Minutes from October 12, 2020 Councilmember Fair moved approval of the regular meeting minutes. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments None. E. Public Services Announcements/Updates • General Election Day — November 3, 2020 F. Council Liaison Updates EDA — Councilmember Davidson provided an update on the EDA meeting. The EDA approved several small business grants and the 2020 Comprehensive Housing Needs and Market Demands Study. F. Department Update • COVID-19 update was provided. • City Administrator Update. Jeff O'Neill provided an update on the following: City Council Minutes October 26, 2020 Page 1 1 4 1. DMV will be conducting training on the new MNDrive system. In addition, they are in the final stages of implementing a `take a number' system. • Construction Update. Matt Leonard provided an update on current projects: 1. Closure on Fallon Ave. for the Haven Ridge Development project. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Hilgart moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,036,959.15. B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for city departments. Recommendation: Approved hires for MCC, Streets, and Finance and departures for MCC and Liquor Store. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of approving a closure of the DMV facility from Wednesday, November 11, 2020 through Saturday, November 14, 2020 for the State's transition from MNLARS to MNDrive. Recommendation: Approved the closure. E. Consideration of accepting quote and approving the purchase of an electronic gate system at the city compost facility in the amount of $39,185. Recommendation: Accepted bid and approved purchase of an electronic gate system from TAPCO in the amount of $39,185. F. Consideration of accepting quote and approving the purchase of an asset management software in the amount of $17,000. Recommendation: Accepted quote and approved purchase of an asset management system from Cartegraph in the amount of $17,000. G. Consideration of approving 2021 Wright County Annual Highway Maintenance Agreement. Recommendation: Approved the maintenance agreement. H. Consideration of approving annual Snowplowing and Ice Removal Policy for the 2020-2021 snow season. Recommendation: Approved the Snowplowing and Ice Removal Policy. I. Consideration of a Change Order #2 for Monticello Community Center Roofing Project, City Project No. 200004 for a total amount of $11,703. Recommendation: Approved the change order. J. Consideration of approving an easement agreement for the 2020 Stormwater Improvement Project, City Project 200002. Recommendation: Approved the easement agreement with James and Michelle Montroy for the 2020 Stormwater Improvements project, City Project 200002. City Council Minutes October 26, 2020 Page 2 1 4 K. Consideration of approving a land purchase agreement and easements for the 2020 Stormwater Improvements Project, City Project 200002. Recommendation: Approved purchase agreements for real property and easements with A Glorious Church in a total amount of $163,000 pending land -use approvals for the 2020 Stormwater Improvements Project, City Project 200002. L. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-75 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $22,008.88 to New Look Contracting, Inc. for the 2018 Pedestrian Improvement Project, City Project No. 18C001. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2020-75 accepting improvement and authorized final payment of $22,008.88 to New Look Contracting, Inc. 3. Public Hearin A. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration of adontina Resolution 2020-72 annrovin an assessment roll for delinquent miscellaneous accounts to be certified to the County Auditor for 2021 payable tax year. Jeff O'Neill introduced the item. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Councilmember Hilgart moved to adopt Resolution 2020-72 approving an assessment roll for delinquent miscellaneous accounts. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-73 approving an assessment roll for delinquent utility accounts to be certified to the County Auditor for the 2021 payable tax year Jeff O'Neill introduced the item. Matt Leonard noted that the city received an email from Russell Melton noting an objection to the water meter assessment. The city had not yet received a written letter objecting to the assessment. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Councilmember Hilgart moved to adopt Resolution 2020-73 approving an assessment roll for delinquent utility accounts. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-74 approving an assessment roll for the 2020 Street Improvement Project, City Project No. 200001 Matt Leonard gave a presentation on the 2020 Street Improvement Project and the assessment. The project areas of Meadows/Balbolul/Anders/Wilhem, Cardinal Hills, Oakridge, and Wastewater Treatment Plant were reviewed. The proposed improvements and assessment policy was summarized. The total cost of the project cost of the street project was $1,280,217.61 with 50% being assessed to property owners. The assessment per unit is $1,945.62. There were 329 parcels assessed. Property owners can pay the full assessment amount without interest by November 25, 2020, otherwise it will be certified to the county City Council Minutes October 26, 2020 Page 3 1 4 for taxes payable beginning in 2021. The assessment is proposed for a 10 -year period with 3.5% interest. The assessment amount per unit was significantly lower than the proposed $3,100. This was due to the receipt of lower bids than estimates, lower overhead costs, and additional reconstruction was not needed. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. The following individuals testified: Susan 112 Marvin Elwood Rd. had a question about what needs to take place if she sold her house in a couple of years. Staff responded that most likely she would be required to pay off before the sale of the house. However, this would be negotiated with the sale of the house. Brenda Anderson, Falcon Ave., questioned the reason for resurfacing Falcon Ave. because it wasn't that bad. She expressed concern that some of the problems exist because of the way they plow the street and ice gets built up. With no further testimony, Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Councilmember Hilgart moved to adopt Resolution 2020-74 approving an assessment roll for the 2020 Street Improvement Project, City Project No. 200001. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Added Item• • Discussion on Mielke/Jamison property. Councilmember Davidson reviewed past discussion about the city providing property for a possible development. The developer was encouraged to continue discussions with staff regarding negotiations pertaining to the property. He would like the process to continue so a decision can be made whether the project continues or not. Councilmember Davidson expressed his opinion that the city should first decide what they deem the investment of the land to be. That this should be decided before proposals come forward. Councilmembers Davidson and Hilgart volunteered to meet with staff and the developers to forward the discussion. 5. Adjournment: By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:21 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes October 26, 2020 Page 4 14 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 9, 2020 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: Bill Fair 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Agenda Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the agenda. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Citizen Comments None. D. Public Services Announcements/Updates • City Hall and Public Works office will be closed on Wednesday, November 11 in observance of Veterans Day. Hi -Way Liquors and the MCC will be open normal hours. • The DMV will be closed Wednesday, November 11 through Saturday, November 14 while the State of MN converts from MNLARS to the new MNDrive system. E. Council Liaison Updates • EDA — Councilmember Davidson noted that they approved the last three small businesses, recommended chapter of 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and there was an update provided by WSB. • CMRP — Angela Schumann stated that a workshop was help with the Federal Highway Administration and MnDOT. • IEDC — Angela Schumann commented that the group spent most of their meeting reviewing the hospitality study. • Planning Commission- Councilmember Gabler provided an overview of the meeting: three public hearings and one regular agenda item. F. Debartment Update • City Administrator Update (including COVID Update). Jeff O'Neill provided an update on the following: 1. A number of city staff are quarantined or waiting on test results due to possible COVID-19 exposure. 2. Special meeting on Friday, November 13 on CARES Act funding. Canvassing of election results will also take place at this meeting. 3. The city found significant savings through the Cable Commission in regard to the future new AV equipment. City Council Minutes November 9, 2020 Page 1 1 3 • FiberNet Quarterly Update. Mark Birkholz, Arvig, provided the FiberNet quarterly update which was included in the packet. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the Consent Agenda excluding items F & J. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $966,148.36. B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for city departments. Recommendation: Approved hires for MCC and departures for MCC, Liquor Store, and Parks. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: Approved as presented. D. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be conducted by the Monticello Chamber of Commerce for their annual banquet on December 4, 2020. Recommendation: Approved the temporary charitable gambling permit. E. Consideration of approving an Interim Use Permit to store Public Works equipment for a limited time as a secondary use on private property in the B-3, Highway Business zoning District. Applicant: City of Monticello. Recommendation: Approved an Interim Use Permit for Public Warehousing, Temporary, in the western -most building at 1305 Edmonson Ave. NE, for a period not to exceed 5 years, or when the lease for such storage terminates, whichever is sooner, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z and based on findings in Resolution No. PC -2020-032. F. Consideration of approving a request for a Simple Subdivision and Lot Combination related to City of Monticello stormwater improvements on the A Glorious Church property. Applicant: City of Monticello. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. G. Consideration of approving as assessment agreement for payment of SAC/WAC/Trunk Area Utility Charges for Ultra Machining Company, LLC. Recommendation: Approved the Sewer and Water Availability and Connection and Trunk Area Assessment Agreement with Ultra Machining Company, LLC. H. Consideration of approving a partial release of Development Contract and PUD and partial release of Special Assessment Agreement for Mills Properties, LLC. Recommendation: Approved the Partial Release of Assessment Agreement (SW Quadrant of I-94/CSAH 18) and the Partial Release of Development Contract and Planned Unit Development for Mills Fleet Farm Addition to Monticello as prepared for the subject properties as prepared. I. Consideration of accepting bids and awarding 2020 Stormwater Improvement project. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2020-76 accepting bids and City Council Minutes November 9, 2020 Page 2 13 awarding contract to Jason LLC, for the 2020 Stormwater Improvements project, City Project No. 200003 for a total amount of $462,494.18. J. Consideration of authorizing Fire Department to purchase new Command Vehicle. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. K. Consideration of authorizing an agreement for shared utility services for 207 and 211 Dundas Road. Recommendation: Authorized an agreement for shared utility services for 207 and 211 Dundas Road. L. Consideration to proceed with a Small Area Plan for the Chelsea Commons area. Recommendation: Approved the development of a Small Area Plan for Chelsea Commons using existing staff and city -appointed consultants at a cost not to exceed $45,000. 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion F. Consideration of approving a request for a Simple Subdivision and Lot Combination related to City of Monticello stormwater improvements on the A Glorious Church property. Applicant: City of Monticello. Councilmember Hilgart moved to approve the request for Simple Subdivision and Lot Combination for the subject parcels, contingent on the requirements identified in Exhibit Z, based on findings in Resolution No. PC - 2020 -035. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. J. Consideration of authorizing Fire Department to purchase new Command Vehicle. 3. Adiournment: By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:09 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes November 9, 2020 Page 3 1 3 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Friday, November 13, 2020 — 7 a.m. North Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: Jim Davidson Others: City staff: Jeff O'Neill, Rachel Leonard, Sarah Rathlisberger (on phone), and Jennifer Schreiber 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 7 a.m. 2. 7 a.m. Consideration of canvassing the returns and adopting resolution declaring the results of the 2020 General Election for the City of Monticello offices Jennifer Schreiber presented the resolution canvassing the election results. Councilmember Fair moved to adopt Resolution 2020-78 declaring the results of the 2020 General Election for the municipal offices of the Mayor and Councilmembers: Mayor — Lloyd Hilgart and Councilmembers — Jim Davidson and Sam Murdoff. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. 7:05 a.m. Consideration of adopting resolution allocating Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act funds to certain uses and payment of related bills Sarah Rathlisberger, Finance Director, presented the resolution. She noted the addition of $7,015 for the Cable Commission for the Monticello Community Center's online workout program functionality and a revised resolution was presented. With the addition of this amount, $92,462.89 would be going back to Wright County. There was minimal discussion among Council. Councilmember Hilgart expressed concern that there may be a use for the additional funds. He proposed that these funds be allocated to local businesses. There was agreement among the City Council as long as it was for the businesses that had applied for the grant previously. In addition, they would need to submit a request by noon for processing purposes. Mayor Stumpf moved to adopt Resolution 2020-79 allocating Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act funds to certain uses as presented with the addition of the $7,015 with $92,462.89 being returned to Wright County unless businesses who previously applied and received CARES Act funding request addition funds for economic support as available and that they are submitted by noon on Friday, November 13. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 7:30 a.m. City Council Special Meeting Minutes November 13, 2020 Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes November 13, 2020 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 2A. Consideration of approving payment of bills (SR) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,910,955.11. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: debbie.davidson Printed: 11/17/2020 - 4:1OPM Batch: 00203.11.2020 - 203.11.2020 US Bank Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Moiiii6effo Y Reference Vendor: 4263 CAYAN Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 1613697 (16,268) transactions 10/2020 1,746.77 11/06/2020 609-49754-443980 1613697 10/2020 - (3) machine rental; sevice fee 128.69 11/06/2020 609-49754-424100 Check Total: 1,875.46 Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 11/1/2020 Life Insurance - Nov 2020 2,624.32 11/06/2020 101-00000-217066 Check Total: 2,624.32 Vendor: 5147 MN PEIP Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 1016648 Health Insurance - Dec 2020 39,641.10 11/06/2020 101-00000-217061 Check Total: 39,641.10 Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True UB Sept 2020 5005 - spklr - 822 Hart Blvd. 123.48 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 8631 - Animal Shelter 73.11 11/06/2020 101-42700-438200 UB Sept 2020 5026 - Ellison Park 27.17 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 8905 - PW Office 15.34 11/06/2020 101-43127-438200 UB Sept 2020 5002- spklr- 1510 Hart Blvd 50.67 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 8119 - 303 6th St - Parks new 73.07 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 7224 - WWTP 1,461.68 11/06/2020 602-49480-438200 UB Sept 2020 8394 - spklr - Riverside Cem. 26.49 11/06/2020 651-49010-438200 UB Sept 2020 7256-004 - 130 Brdwy- Stormwtr 12.25 11/06/2020 213-46301-438200 UB Sept 2020 5004 - spklr - 1390 Hart Blvd 248.71 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 7441 - spklr - 200 W. Broadway 11.42 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 14915 - spklr - 4100 1/2 Cedar 10.40 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 8528 - Monti -NSP Sftbll Fields 495.24 11/06/2020 101-45203-438200 UB Sept 2020 8086 - 4th St. Warming House 15.34 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 8177 - Library 213.18 11/06/2020 101-45501-438200 UB Sept 2020 8674 - spklr - 207 Chelsea Rd 20.53 11/06/2020 601-49440-438200 UB Sept 2020 8117 - MCC 629.35 11/06/2020 226-45126-438200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/17/2020 - 4:10 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference UB Sept 2020 8622 - Pioneer Park bathroom 24.82 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 10128 - Prairie Cntr. Bldg. 59.68 11/06/2020 101-41941-438200 UB Sept 2020 8906 - spklr - PW 32.46 11/06/2020 101-43127-438200 UB Sept 2020 5569 - spklr - Meadow Oak Ave 245.43 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 8488 - spklr - Hillcrest Park 53.69 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 15291 - Commuter Lot- Stormwtr 26.25 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 13953 - spklr - Hwy25/SE Brdwy 20.18 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 15064 - spklr -Featherstone Pk 43.35 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 15363 - spklr- Fallon/7th St. 186.10 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 5248 - spklr - Bridge Park E 187.95 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 7885 - DMV/Food Shelf 154.99 11/06/2020 217-41990-438200 UB Sept 2020 15292 - Dwntwn Parking-Strmwtr 12.25 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 5249 - spklr - Bridge Park W 143.94 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 8533 - spklr Chelsea Rd Lft St 53.69 11/06/2020 602-49490-438200 UB Sept 2020 15362 - spklr-Fallon/Chelsea 39.44 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 7256-007 - 103 Pine St- EDA 29.34 11/06/2020 213-46301-438200 UB Sept 2020 5003 - spklr - 1460 Hart Blvd 78.84 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 8621 - spklr- Fenning rnd-a-bt 40.09 11/06/2020 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2020 8903 - PW Shop/Clerical 263.35 11/06/2020 101-43127-438200 UB Sept 2020 8120 - Bldg. Inspec. Garage 29.34 11/06/2020 101-41940-438200 UB Sept 2020 10063 - spklr - Front St. Park 72.23 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 7256-008 - 112 River St. W EDA 29.34 11/06/2020 213-46301-438200 UB Sept 2020 10267 - spklr - Comm. Garden 7.51 11/06/2020 226-45127-438200 UB Sept 2020 5250 - Bridge Park W 47.65 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 8904 - PW Vehicle Storage 9.62 11/06/2020 101-43127-438200 UB Sept 2020 5637 - Meadow Oak Dog Park 6.16 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 7256-003 - MontiArts 29.34 11/06/2020 101-45204-438200 UB Sept 2020 8114 - Hi -Way Liquors 136.67 11/06/2020 609-49754-438200 UB Sept 2020 14522 - spklr - Hillside Cem. 5.35 11/06/2020 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2020 15640 - 103 Chelsea Rd- Fire 562.01 11/06/2020 101-42200-438200 Check Total: 6,138.49 Vendor: 4470 US BANK - BONDS Check Sequence: 5 1664897 GO Bonds 2013B - WWTP - Interest 26,198.75 11/06/2020 602-49480-461100 1664897 GO Bonds 2013B - WWTP - Principal 190,000.00 11/06/2020 602-00000-231200 Check Total: 216,198.75 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 6 11/06/2020 Fastenal -8' cedar tone - mailbox repair 8.67 11/15/2020 101-43120-422990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - gigabit switch 16.99 11/15/2020 702-00000-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - 45 pc. shockwave set; 1 lb. screN 24.17 11/15/2020 101-43120-422990 ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/17/2020 - 4:10 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2020 Grainger -round motor start for shop garage door 26.66 11/15/2020 101-43127-422990 11/06/2020 Fastenal -(4) lime vest 32.02 11/15/2020 101-43120-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings - 3 pk. 25ct. cable ties for C-mas lightE 41.97 11/15/2020 101-43160-421990 11/06/2020 Safeguard Security - 11/2020 security monitoring 44.95 11/15/2020 101-42200-431990 11/06/2020 Dyna - (6) cryobit w/ flats 59.11 11/15/2020 101-43127-421990 11/06/2020 Wine Spectator - online subscription 59.95 11/15/2020 609-49754-443300 11/06/2020 Auto Value - #107-(2) back up alarm & stock 73.98 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Zee Medical - disp. box; burnjel; zee strips - Wal 36.35 11/15/2020 601-49440-421990 11/06/2020 Zee Medical - (2) disp. box; burnjel;(2) zee strip: 57.40 11/15/2020 101-43127-421990 11/06/2020 Monti Napa - (200) trailer wire 117.00 11/15/2020 101-43127-421990 11/06/2020 Border State- (108) 12pk. C batteries 145.80 11/15/2020 101-42200-421990 11/06/2020 Dyna - o -rings buna-n metric 184.71 11/15/2020 101-43127-422990 11/06/2020 Auto Value - (5) LED lights; (2) fuel pump filter, 226.98 11/15/2020 101-43125-422100 11/06/2020 Diamond Drilling (2) concrete/asphalt saw blade 595.88 11/15/2020 101-43120-422100 11/06/2020 Crysteel Truck - #105; 113 - (2) plastic bolt on h 684.53 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Westside Wholesale Tire - #107 (4) tires plow to 1,621.24 11/15/2020 101-43120-440500 11/06/2020 PayPal - ebay Card.com- furnace -not aval. cred 755.68 11/15/2020 101-00000-115030 11/06/2020 Fastenal - (4) split M14; (4) 5/8 P 1.40 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Ebay- metrodcmusic 2pk microphone cable 26.59 11/15/2020 101-45204-421990 11/06/2020 Grainger - test tube rack 45.25 11/15/2020 601-49440-421990 11/06/2020 McMaster -Carr -(10) check valve 70.12 11/15/2020 601-49440-421990 11/06/2020 Ausco - (11) apparel screen; (8) embroidery - sp] 22.00 11/15/2020 101-43120-421990 11/06/2020 Ausco - (11) apparel screen; (8) embroidery - sp] 11.00 11/15/2020 601-49440-421990 11/06/2020 Ausco - (11) apparel screen; (8) embroidery - sp] 11.00 11/15/2020 602-49490-421990 11/06/2020 Ausco - (11) apparel screen; (8) embroidery - sp] 31.00 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Ausco - (11) apparel screen; (8) embroidery - sp] 9.00 11/15/2020 101-43127-421990 11/06/2020 Titan Machine - (2) Lamp - to return 12/2020 bai 103.00 11/15/2020 101-00000-115030 11/06/2020 Amazon - (3) LED work light bar/wiring harness 218.97 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Boyer - steeling wheel; (2) desiccant. 265.55 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 MRWA- membership renewal 8/2020-7/2021 300.00 11/15/2020 601-49440-443300 11/06/2020 Akon - 21'x12' paint/wash bay curtain 564.81 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Force America - granular feedback kit 584.67 11/15/2020 101-43125-422100 11/06/2020 The Business Journal - Annual Subscription (JO; 115.00 11/15/2020 101-41310-443300 11/06/2020 Amazon - Monthly Calendar Desk Mat 11.56 11/15/2020 101-41310-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Stapler 19.58 11/15/2020 101-41310-421990 11/06/2020 Domino's Pizza - Food for Election Workers P1 83.95 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 Domino's Pizza - Food for Election Workers P2 83.95 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 Monticello General Rental - Stanchions for Elect 276.00 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 Jimmy Johns - Lunch Election Workers - P1 95.20 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 Jimmy Johns - Lunch Election Workers - P2 90.73 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 Jimmy Johns - Lunch Election Workers - P1 47.29 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 Target.com - Beverages for City Meetings 23.62 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 USPS - Certified Mail for Elections 6.95 11/15/2020 101-41410-432200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/17/2020 - 4:10 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2020 Walmart - Beverages for City Meetings 27.88 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 Boyer - charged in error. refund coming next mo 576.99 11/15/2020 101-00000-115030 11/06/2020 Auto Value - #110 - hydraulic filter 97.87 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Auto Value - (2) LED light for plow trucks 47.90 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Monti Napa - boxed miniat. LMP 3157 1.07 11/15/2020 601-49440-421990 11/06/2020 Home depot - #105 - composite shim 1.98 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Home depot - #105 - panel light 4.99 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Runnings - (2) 2pk. batteries 10.98 11/15/2020 101-43120-421990 11/06/2020 Auto Value - #116 - headlight 12.99 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Home Depot - plexiglass 6"x9 13.69 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - plexiglass 6"x9 13.69 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings - (6) 50 gal. anitfreeze 14.94 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - 12pk. Sharpie markers 20.98 11/15/2020 101-43110-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - utility scrub brush 15.06 11/15/2020 101-43127-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings - Ratchet Strap 16.99 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Travel Centers of Am- #105 - steering wheel cov 17.77 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Martie's - Tingley overshoes 19.99 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Boyer - #105 - circuit breaker 20.12 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Monti Napa 4105 - (4) 80w-90 qt. 20.32 11/15/2020 101-43125-422100 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (2) sweep brush 22.29 11/15/2020 609-49754-422990 11/06/2020 Auto Value - (6) washer fluid 23.94 11/15/2020 101-43127-421990 11/06/2020 Monti Napa 4105 - (6) hydro fittings 24.24 11/15/2020 101-43125-422100 11/06/2020 Kwik Trip - (11.462) gal. D2 Bio @ $2.189 25.09 11/15/2020 101-45201-421200 11/06/2020 Grainger - (4) 12pk batteries 26.62 11/15/2020 101-43110-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (2) plexiglass Men hndcp - braille 27.38 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon -3 pk. 20 oz. cleaner 29.39 11/15/2020 101-43110-421990 11/06/2020 Fastenal - 500 cable ties 29.70 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Auto Value - #105 - (5) 80W90 gear oil 32.45 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (2) 8' prime Douglas Fir 39.02 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - step stool; gorilla tape; scrub brus 45.88 11/15/2020 101-43127-421990 11/06/2020 Auto Value - #103 -LED light; #105- u -joint 49.94 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (12) 18" round steel stake 51.00 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Royal Tire -ATV MT/DMT; valve stem; dispose 51.84 11/15/2020 101-45201-440440 11/06/2020 Cub - resale- lemons; limes 53.00 11/15/2020 609-49750-425500 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (5) 8' cear tone; 1 lb. trim head sc: 53.33 11/15/2020 101-43120-421990 11/06/2020 Auto Value - #105- (3) wire harness; (3) LED re: 54.92 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Runnings - (2) chamois; grouting sponge; (2) cle 55.16 11/15/2020 101-43120-421990 11/06/2020 FSSoulutions - DOT urine screen- B.R. 56.38 11/15/2020 601-49440-431990 11/06/2020 Fastened -(700) cable ties 56.58 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (5) 4pk. batteries; (4) wiper fluid 60.66 11/15/2020 101-42200-421990 11/06/2020 Auto Value - #110 - automotive V -ribbed; (2) pil 68.97 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Live Laugh Bloom - flowers for funeral 75.00 11/15/2020 101-42200-443990 11/06/2020 AT & T - FirstNet 9/2020 (3) unl. aircards 76.46 11/15/2020 101-42200-432100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/17/2020 - 4:10 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2020 McMaster -Carr -1 gal. lime & rust cleaner; (4) 1 77.12 11/15/2020 601-49440-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings - (2) dual head st. foot; tire repr. kit; et 77.53 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 M & M Express - drive shaft 81.22 11/15/2020 101-43120-422100 11/06/2020 Auto Value - bilevel brush; (6) mini lamp; handl( 81.41 11/15/2020 101-45201-422990 11/06/2020 Royal Tire - Tire mt/dm; flat repair; 89.97 11/15/2020 101-45201-440440 11/06/2020 Amazon - wireless printer/scanner/copier -CART 99.99 11/15/2020 101-42500-421990 11/06/2020 NFPA- guide for Fire & Explosions Investigation 118.95 11/15/2020 101-42200-433100 11/06/2020 Sherwin Williams -(10) 5 gal. br. white 119.07 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 PQL - light bulbs for commuter parking lot 125.43 11/15/2020 101-43120-422990 11/06/2020 Amazon - printer - MCC front counter- CARES 138.90 11/15/2020 702-00000-421990 11/06/2020 Grainger - visor transmitter 140.22 11/15/2020 101-43127-421990 11/06/2020 DISH - 11/1-12/1/2020 service 77.00 11/15/2020 609-49754-432500 11/06/2020 Auto Value - #110- hydro filter; (2) sander lights 145.77 11/15/2020 101-43125-422100 11/06/2020 Home Depot - sledge hammer; tile chisel; (6) pri 157.69 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 PayPal - Milpaws- shank 165.15 11/15/2020 601-49440-422990 11/06/2020 Amazon -(12) 50ct. face masks- CARES 168.60 11/15/2020 101-42500-421990 11/06/2020 CWP - #104 front plow turn hoses 169.06 11/15/2020 101-43125-422100 11/06/2020 Safety Kleen- (8) g. waste combustable liquid 192.91 11/15/2020 101-43127-431990 11/06/2020 CWP - #116 & 109 - hydro. hose; (4) hydro ada] 199.74 11/15/2020 101-43125-422100 11/06/2020 St. Michael Spinal Rehab- Drug Screen- MB; TI 90.00 11/15/2020 101-43120-431990 11/06/2020 St. Michael Spinal Rehab- Drug Screen -BR 120.00 11/15/2020 601-49440-431990 11/06/2020 DSG - (6) repair lid w/ screws for curb box riser 216.52 11/15/2020 601-49440-422990 11/06/2020 Cintas - mat service - #4062397806; 406305108: 214.64 11/15/2020 609-49754-431990 11/06/2020 Sherwin Williams -(20) 5 gal. br. white 238.15 11/15/2020 101-45203-421990 11/06/2020 Boyer - #109- tank air.s; purge valve; service cal 240.31 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Cintas - mat service - #4064353569; 406498835: 255.95 11/15/2020 609-49754-431990 11/06/2020 Martie's - (35) straw bales 262.50 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon -montitor for payroll clerk - CARES 297.00 11/15/2020 702-00000-421990 11/06/2020 Drastic Measure - resale - beer 321.00 11/15/2020 609-49750-425200 11/06/2020 Ameripride - Sept. 2020 uniforms - Parks 143.24 11/15/2020 101-45201-441700 11/06/2020 Ameripride - Sept. 2020 uniforms - Sewer 91.42 11/15/2020 602-49490-441700 11/06/2020 Ameripride - Sept. 2020 uniforms - Water 91.42 11/15/2020 601-49440-441700 11/06/2020 Ameripride - Sept. 2020 uniforms - Streets 224.19 11/15/2020 101-43120-441700 11/06/2020 Ameripride - Sept. 2020 Shop towels 263.57 11/15/2020 101-43127-421990 11/06/2020 Royal Tire - Engine 12- tire mount/dismount 817.11 11/15/2020 101-42200-440500 11/06/2020 Arctic Glacier - resale inv.#3459024806; 25503; 1,531.24 11/15/2020 609-49750-425500 11/06/2020 Ebay- sweetwatersound- loudspeaker system; sp 1,875.00 11/15/2020 101-45204-421990 11/06/2020 Sherwin Williams -(35) 5 gal. Emeral Exsa paint 1,939.70 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Sherwin Williams -(20) 5 gal. white- ballfields 346.60 11/15/2020 101-45203-421990 11/06/2020 Big Lake Lumber - (4) invoices- supplies for 4th 2,604.84 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 WHCE - Sunset Ponds 9/1-10/1/2020 (969) kWI 130.56 11/15/2020 602-49490-438100 11/06/2020 WHCE - DMV 19.95 11/15/2020 217-41990-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE - 2171 W River St 36.45 11/15/2020 101-45201-431900 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/17/2020 - 4:10 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2020 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave NE 19.95 11/15/2020 601-49440-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE - MCC 27.95 11/15/2020 226-45126-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE - 207 Chelsea Rd 32.95 11/15/2020 601-49440-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE - 209 Cedar St 29.95 11/15/2020 601-49440-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE - 132 E. Broadway 29.95 11/15/2020 601-49440-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE - 107 River St. W. 19.95 11/15/2020 101-45201-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE - Hi -Way Liquor - Nov 2020 21.42 11/15/2020 609-49754-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE - MCC - Nov 2020 19.95 11/15/2020 226-45126-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE -200 Dundas Rd. - Nov 2020 29.95 11/15/2020 601-49440-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE -909 Golf Course Rd - Nov 2020 19.95 11/15/2020 101-43110-431900 11/06/2020 WHCE- General Street Lighting 2,098.60 11/15/2020 101-43160-438100 11/06/2020 Stepp Manu. -install ignitor- asphalt patch box to 547.00 11/15/2020 101-43120-440440 11/06/2020 Rogers Radiator Repair- #110 radiator 750.00 11/15/2020 101-43120-422110 11/06/2020 Towmaster- #105 & 104- (2)curb runners 363.26 11/15/2020 101-43125-422100 11/06/2020 CWP - #110- (4) hyro hoses for front plow 368.41 11/15/2020 101-43125-422100 11/06/2020 NBP - cs. suckers; (3) 50 pk. roll pap. towels;(2) 409.87 11/15/2020 609-49754-421990 11/06/2020 Streichers - (72) patches for class A uniforms 432.00 11/15/2020 101-42200-421120 11/06/2020 Home Depot - compression nut 2.22 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - return clamps; tee black -5.05 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (2) 5 pk. acc conduit hanger 5.48 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - (2) hanging file folder frame 15.96 11/15/2020 101-43110-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings - 8 lb. barbed staples 16.99 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Fastenal - (16) springnuts; (4) M16 split; etc. 20.43 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Fastenal - (200) cable ties 26.88 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Fastenal - 7/16x10xl2CrbdSDS Bt 26.94 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon -printer cable; 100 ct. file folders; file o 28.89 11/15/2020 101-43110-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - shockwave mag bit holder; steel ii 29.78 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings -(2) pipe; (3) coupling; hex bushing; el 31.30 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (2) 6x9 plexiglass braille sign; he: 32.73 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot -(2) blk nipple; (2) reducer; (3) con 45.22 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings - (3) 10' pipe; (4) conduit hanger 48.13 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - undercounter filter; ice maker kit; 82.54 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 EATI - LED surface mount lighthead 89.13 11/15/2020 101-43120-422100 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (4) 60' blk. nipple; asst, blk. nippl 94.35 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (30) 60 lb. concrete mix 99.00 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Fastenal - 10' gal. 13/16 SH 14g; misc. nuts; bolt 116.41 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings - (2) vice grip c -clamp; (2) wheel brus] 215.29 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (10) portable LED light; (7) 15' ea 267.71 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Fastenal -(2) drilling bit; hammer bit; (2) sp. pair 305.49 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Home Depot - (17) 16'#2 prime cedar; 5 lb. 3" s 417.64 11/15/2020 101-45201-421990 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 - Recycling 19,240.20 11/15/2020 101-43230-438400 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 - GFEE 3,930.96 11/15/2020 101-00000-208120 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 35.80 11/15/2020 101-43127-438400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/17/2020 - 4:10 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 47.74 11/15/2020 101-45201-438400 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 23.87 11/15/2020 101-45201-438400 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 113.38 11/15/2020 602-49480-438400 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 208.87 11/15/2020 226-45126-438400 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 23.87 11/15/2020 609-49754-438400 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 23.87 11/15/2020 101-45201-438400 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 53.82 11/15/2020 101-45201-438400 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 11.93 11/15/2020 101-45501-431990 11/06/2020 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2020 41,553.64 11/15/2020 101-43230-438400 11/06/2020 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 11.184 gals @ $1.999 22.36 11/15/2020 217-41990-421200 11/06/2020 Holiday - Diesel Fuel 3.897 gals @ $2.189 - Sno 8.53 11/15/2020 101-45201-421200 11/06/2020 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.004 gals @ $1.999 20.00 11/15/2020 217-41990-421200 11/06/2020 Amazon - Mailing Labels 57.39 11/15/2020 226-45122-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Calculator 12.49 11/15/2020 226-45122-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Clocks (2) 39.90 11/15/2020 226-45122-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Envelopes (500) 20.99 11/15/2020 217-41990-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - AA Batteries (48 pk) 30.98 11/15/2020 226-45122-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - File Folders, Planner, Expanding File 53.54 11/15/2020 101-41310-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Calculator Ribbon 6.90 11/15/2020 217-41990-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Ink Cartridge (JC) COVID 20.89 11/15/2020 101-42500-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Highlighters, Post It Notes, Pens, Pap( 42.56 11/15/2020 217-41990-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Hand Sanitizing Wipes 39.99 11/15/2020 101-41310-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Letter Openers (12 pcs) 5.79 11/15/2020 101-41310-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Calculator (CB) 47.00 11/15/2020 101-41520-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Bulletin Board 47.49 11/15/2020 101-41800-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Ink Cartridge (TE) COVID 52.99 11/15/2020 101-42500-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Velcro 20.37 11/15/2020 226-45122-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Microwave, Batteries, Scanner 440.74 11/15/2020 217-41990-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Life Savers Candy (2 bags) 14.98 11/15/2020 101-41310-421990 11/06/2020 Amazon - Paper Plates, Self Adhesive Index Car 44.79 11/15/2020 217-41990-421990 11/06/2020 Bluestone Grill - City Administrator Candidate 1 30.49 11/15/2020 101-41800-443990 11/06/2020 Chattersl - City Administrator Candidate Lunch 45.27 11/15/2020 101-41800-443990 11/06/2020 Cintas - Mop & Towels Service #4061755571, 4 92.54 11/15/2020 226-45126-431990 11/06/2020 Cintas - Mop &Towels Service #4062397770, 4( 139.75 11/15/2020 226-45126-431990 11/06/2020 Cintas - Mat Service #4063051537 10.02 11/15/2020 101-41410-431990 11/06/2020 Cintas - Mat Service #4063051018 29.94 11/15/2020 101-45501-431990 11/06/2020 Cintas - Mat Service #4065656600 31.14 11/15/2020 101-45501-431990 11/06/2020 Cintas - Mop & Towels Service #4064988268, 4 104.34 11/15/2020 226-45126-431990 11/06/2020 Condon Skelly - Renew 1929 Fire Truck Ins 9/2. 138.00 11/15/2020 101-42200-436300 11/06/2020 Cornerstone Cafe - City Administrator Candidat( 57.10 11/15/2020 101-41800-443990 11/06/2020 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 34.75 11/15/2020 217-41990-421990 11/06/2020 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 412.81 11/15/2020 226-45126-421990 11/06/2020 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 27.89 11/15/2020 101-41941-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/17/2020 - 4:10 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2020 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 792.44 11/15/2020 226-45126-421990 11/06/2020 Dacotah Paper - Hand Sanitizer, Bleach, COVID 420.38 11/15/2020 101-42500-421990 11/06/2020 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 97.20 11/15/2020 101-45501-421990 11/06/2020 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 39.14 11/15/2020 101-41941-421990 11/06/2020 Domino's Pizza - Food for Election Workers 19.72 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 11.222 gals @ $1.999 22.43 11/15/2020 217-41990-421200 11/06/2020 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 11.819 gals @ $1.999 23.63 11/15/2020 217-41990-421200 11/06/2020 International Code Council - Code Books (6) 379.62 11/15/2020 101-42400-443500 11/06/2020 Integritprint - A Frame Signs for Elections (4) - ( 581.40 11/15/2020 101-42500-421990 11/06/2020 Integritprint - Corrugated Inserts for Signs (8) - 331.47 11/15/2020 101-42500-421990 11/06/2020 League MN Cities - Adobe Acrobat Pro (11/20 - 75.37 11/15/2020 101-41310-443990 11/06/2020 League MN Cities - Adobe Acrobat Pro (11/20 - 75.37 11/15/2020 101-41410-443990 11/06/2020 League MN Cities - Adobe Acrobat Pro (11/20 - 37.69 11/15/2020 101-41910-443990 11/06/2020 League MN Cities - Adobe Acrobat Pro (11/20 - 37.69 11/15/2020 213-46301-443990 11/06/2020 Martie's - Softner Salt (63 bags) 378.00 11/15/2020 226-45126-422990 11/06/2020 MN GFOA - Annual Membership (LL) 70.00 11/15/2020 101-41520-443300 11/06/2020 MN Dept Labor - Qtr 3 Building Permit Surchar; 5,168.46 11/15/2020 101-00000-208110 11/06/2020 MN Dept Labor - Qtr 3 Building Permit Surchar; -206.74 11/15/2020 101-42400-343000 11/06/2020 Monti Chamber - Lunches Sept & Oct (JT) 30.00 11/15/2020 213-46301-443990 11/06/2020 Monti Chamber - Lunch Oct (DK) 15.00 11/15/2020 101-42200-443990 11/06/2020 Monti Chamber - Chamber Membership - Hi Wa 100.00 11/15/2020 609-49754-443300 11/06/2020 Monti Printing - Fall Newsletter Postage 1,338.19 11/15/2020 101-41310-432200 11/06/2020 Trusted Employees - Background Checks Sept (. 48.00 11/15/2020 609-49754-431990 11/06/2020 Trusted Employees - Background Checks Sept (_ 74.00 11/15/2020 101-41410-431990 11/06/2020 Monti Napa - Deep Cree (2) 15.98 11/15/2020 226-45126-422990 11/06/2020 NBP - Clips, Highlighters, Paper, Vinyl Gloves, 102.53 11/15/2020 217-41990-421990 11/06/2020 NBP - Envelopes, Calculator Paper, Copy Paper 64.87 11/15/2020 217-41990-421990 11/06/2020 NBP - 2021 Calendars for Staff 351.65 11/15/2020 101-41310-421990 11/06/2020 NBP- Wall Calendars (3) 41.97 11/15/2020 226-45122-421990 11/06/2020 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service - CH 30.72 11/15/2020 101-41310-431990 11/06/2020 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service - DMV 30.72 11/15/2020 217-41990-431990 11/06/2020 Recreation Supply - Wall Clocks for Pool Area (: 91.06 11/15/2020 226-45124-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings - Keys for Oakwood Conference Roon 4.47 11/15/2020 101-41310-421990 11/06/2020 Runnings - Tank Flapper - Prairie Center 4.99 11/15/2020 101-45501-422990 11/06/2020 Safe Food Training - Food Safety Manager Certi 175.00 11/15/2020 226-45122-433100 11/06/2020 Straight Talk - UB Phone for Pat Addt'l Minutes 38.98 11/15/2020 702-00000-432100 11/06/2020 Survey Monkey - Subscription Renewal 10/11/21 384.00 11/15/2020 101-41800-443300 11/06/2020 Tech Mate - Power Cord for Laptop 49.99 11/15/2020 101-43110-421990 11/06/2020 ThyssenKripp - Elevator Maint Agreement MC( 444.45 11/15/2020 226-45126-431900 11/06/2020 ThyssenKripp - Elevator Maint Agreement PC ( 212.22 11/15/2020 101-41941-431900 11/06/2020 Home Depot - Paint Rollers 27.01 11/15/2020 226-45126-422990 11/06/2020 Beef O Bradys - City Administrator Candidate L 42.12 11/15/2020 101-41800-443990 11/06/2020 Beef O Bradys - City Administrator Candidate L 50.94 11/15/2020 101-41800-443990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/17/2020 - 4:10 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 9.20 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 9.20 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 10.20 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 10.95 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 10.95 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 6.95 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 27.40 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 10.20 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 10.95 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 20.40 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 10.95 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 USPS - Priority Mail Pkgs to State 10.20 11/15/2020 217-41990-432200 11/06/2020 Verizon - Aug 21 - Sept 20 35.01 11/15/2020 101-43115-432100 11/06/2020 Verizon - Aug 21 - Sept 20 61.03 11/15/2020 101-43120-432100 11/06/2020 Verizon - Aug 21 - Sept 20 35.01 11/15/2020 101-45201-432100 11/06/2020 Verizon - Aug 21 - Sept 20 17.50 11/15/2020 601-49440-432100 11/06/2020 Verizon - Aug 21 - Sept 20 17.51 11/15/2020 602-49490-432100 11/06/2020 Verizon - Aug 21 - Sept 20 180.05 11/15/2020 101-42200-432100 11/06/2020 Night Hawk Security - Monthly Security @ Old 49.95 11/15/2020 101-43110-431900 11/06/2020 Peach Jar - Advertising Visit w/Santa 75.00 11/15/2020 226-45127-434990 11/06/2020 Golden Valley Supply - Ceiling Tile 190.72 11/15/2020 226-45126-422990 11/06/2020 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.466 gals @ $1.999 20.92 11/15/2020 217-41990-421200 11/06/2020 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.834 gals @ $1.999 21.66 11/15/2020 217-41990-421200 11/06/2020 Fastenal - Ninja Ice Gloves (2 pr) 21.18 11/15/2020 101-42400-421990 Check Total: 112,467.21 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 7 00011048898 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - Oct 2020 (1/2) 55.39 11/06/2020 601-49440-443980 00011048898 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - Oct 2020 (1/2) 55.39 11/06/2020 602-49490-443980 Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 110.78 379,056.11 ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. 7 Date: 11/23/20 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/17/2020 - 4:10 PM) Page 9 Accounts Payable CITY' OF Computer Check Proof List by Vendor Moiiii6effo User: debbie.davidson Printed: 11/18/2020 - 11:07AM Batch: 00206.11.2020 - 206.11.2020 AP Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 5582 ACCENT ELECTRIC & AUTOMATION, INC. Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 2422 install stat in baseboard hrt; ballast; (2) LED stril 730.00 11/24/2020 101-45204-431990 Check Total: 730.00 Vendor: 2139 ADVANCED FIRST AID INC Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 1120-734 (2) defibrillation electrode pads 122.00 11/24/2020 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 122.00 Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 3445791 resale - beer 313.95 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 3446007 resale - beer 170.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 3446861 resale - beer 159.80 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 3447077 resale - beer 199.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 842.75 Vendor: 4502 ARVIG Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True 11/8/2020 IT Services - Nov 2020 73.00 11/24/2020 702-00000-431990 309746 10/2020 FNM expenses- buried drops 6,300.00 11/24/2020 656-49877-440100 309746 10/2020 FNM expenses- Border States; Calix; C 10,724.11 11/24/2020 656-49877-422990 Check Total: 17,097.11 Vendor: 5621 BCI CONSTRUCTION Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 11/10/2020 Refund - Grading Deposit Escrow 3,000.00 11/24/2020 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 3,000.00 Vendor: 1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 1700790 Delo Starplex EP 2-1/120# 436.44 11/24/2020 101-43127-421990 Check Total: 436.44 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True 102212800 resale- mix 171.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 102212800 freight 0.79 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 102293600 resale- mix 280.35 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 102293600 resale- condiments 17.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425500 102293600 asst. bags 179.25 11/24/2020 609-49754-421990 102293600 freight 2.19 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 86599200 resale -liquor 2,718.27 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 86599200 resale- wine 298.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 86667200 resale -liquor 1,331.30 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 86707000 resale- wine 580.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 86707000 resale -liquor 3,280.52 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 86707000 freight 45.48 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 955222 freight credit inv. 86485000 -1.55 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 955222 resale - wine credit inv. 86485000 -144.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 8,758.60 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False 151422 resale- soda pop 87.06 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 151423 resale- beer 1,337.55 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 151423 resale- beer n/a 75.30 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 1,499.91 Vendor: 5619 BERTRAM ELECTRIC, INC. Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 21435 city street light added on 3rd street 6,489.00 11/24/2020 101-43160-440990 Check Total: 6,489.00 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 1081203081 resale- wine 1,554.70 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 1081203081 resale- liquor 2,676.16 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 1081203081 resale- mix 93.65 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 1081203081 freight 61.60 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 4,386.11 Vendor: 1791 BULLSEYE COLLECTION AGENCY INC Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 8/31/2020 Collection Services - Commission 92.50 11/24/2020 226-45122-431990 Check Total: 92.50 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2482972 resale- beer 9,926.25 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 9,926.25 Vendor: 1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False 20135 resale- wine 570.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 570.00 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True 00406828 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (581 lbs) 157.27 11/24/2020 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 157.27 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: True 109-03844 resale - beer 12,004.50 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 109-03844 resale - beer n/a 92.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 109-03875 resale - beer 8,695.99 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 109-03875 resale - beern/a 186.10 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 10903829 resale - beer 10,241.90 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 10903829 resale - beer n/a 27.95 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 10903864 resale - beer n/a 160.40 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 10903864 resale - beer 22,304.35 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 1315084 resale - beer 246.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 1315927 resale - beer 472.80 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 1315938 resale - beer credit -277.60 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 1317032 resale - beer credit -52.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 1317703 resale - beer 360.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 54,462.39 Vendor: 5625 DAVID DROWN ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 00000246 2020 Executive Search Fee for City Administratc 21,000.00 11/24/2020 101-41800-431990 Check Total: 21,000.00 Vendor: 5588 DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 20275 SCADA System Improvements (1/2) 4,221.00 11/24/2020 601-49440-430300 20275 SCADA System Improvements (1/2) 4,221.00 11/24/2020 602-49490-430300 Check Total: 8,442.00 Vendor: 5201 DICK FAMILY, INC. Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 1110179 resale- beer 1,579.95 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 1,579.95 Vendor: 5340 DISGRUNTLED BREWING DISGRUNTLED Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 1066 resale- beer 192.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 192.00 Vendor: 5545 DRASTIC MEASURES BREWING, LLC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 894 resale- beer 288.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 288.00 Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - City Hall 737.21 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - MCC 563.28 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - Ballfields 20.01 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - DMV 300.92 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - Hi Way Liquor 366.09 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - Fire Hall 431.17 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - Public Works 316.49 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - Parks 115.47 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - Prairie Center 14.31 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone - Sheriff 70.40 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - City Hall 244.90 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - MCC 10.00 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - Ballfields 10.00 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - DMV 41.95 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - Hi Way Liquor 41.95 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - Fire Hall 166.90 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - Animal Shelter 29.95 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - Public Works 69.95 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - Sheriff 41.95 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Internet - MCC @ Prairie Center 40.63 11/24/2020 702-00000-432300 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Cable - Fire Hall 103.85 11/24/2020 101-42200-431990 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Cable - CityHall 12.95 11/24/2020 101-41310-431990 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Cable - MCC 344.06 11/24/2020 226-45127-432500 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Data Hosting 500.00 11/24/2020 702-00000-431900 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Service Contract 250.00 11/24/2020 702-00000-431900 11/8/2020 Nov 2020 - Phone & Internet - Monti Arts 126.11 11/24/2020 101-45204-431990 Check Total: 4,970.50 Vendor: 1662 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMPANY Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 37476 resale - mix 370.50 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 370.50 Vendor: 1219 RONALD G HACKENMUELLER Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: True 11/12/2020 Reimbursement - City Admin Lunch (Used Pers( 41.27 11/24/2020 101-41800-443990 Check Total: 41.27 Vendor: 3553 HARVEST BANK Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 11/2/2020 Interest - 2013A GO Certificates of Indebtednes, 1,470.00 11/24/2020 703-00000-461100 11/2/2020 Principald - 2013A GO Certificates of Indebtedn 70,000.00 11/24/2020 703-00000-231200 Check Total: 71,470.00 Vendor: 5627 INNOVATIVE CONCRETE RAISING Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 2245 mudjacking (4) areas of sidewalk 466.64 11/24/2020 101-43120-440990 Check Total: 466.64 Vendor: 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: True 4414 (2) graves- Deuchler; Sutton 800.00 11/24/2020 651-49010-431150 Check Total: 800.00 Vendor: 1245 JLA INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 69188 dba Hotsy.com- truck & equip. wash bulk; 100' 1 547.70 11/24/2020 101-43127-440100 Check Total: 547.70 Vendor: 2018 JOHNS WELDING LLC Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 5280 (30) picnic table frames 3,700.00 11/24/2020 101-45203-421990 Check Total: 3,700.00 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False 122382 resale - wine credit inv. #1621644 -7.47 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 1676779 resale - liquor 2,785.61 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 1676779 freight 33.37 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 1676780 freight 72.16 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 1676780 resale- wine 2,622.09 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 1677896 resale- liquor 1,876.89 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 1677896 freight 20.86 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 1677897 resale - wine 558.20 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 1677897 resale - mix 28.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1677897 freight 10.43 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 1677898 resale - beer 48.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 16801414 freight 143.02 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 16801414 resale - mix 170.95 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 16801414 resale - wine 5,078.89 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 1680243 freight 17.61 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 1680243 resale- liquor 1,085.50 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 1680244 resale- wine 2,895.55 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 1680244 freight 62.58 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 1680960 freight 16.39 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 1680960 resale- wine 525.72 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 1681413 resale - liquor 2,363.75 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 1681413 freight 28.68 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 1682550 resale - liquor 3,000.63 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 1682550 freight 28.56 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 1682551 resale - wine 3,737.27 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 1682551 freight 67.42 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 27,270.66 Vendor: 1273 KIWI KAI IMPORTS, INC. Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False 107019 resale- wine 1,768.70 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 107019 freight 20.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 1,788.70 Vendor: 3829 STEVE LANGANKI Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: True 1314 (24) porta toilet rental 8/19-10/30/2020; Library; 3,495.91 11/24/2020 101-45201-431901 Check Total: 3,495.91 Vendor: 1902 VICKI LEERHOFF Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True 11/16/2020 Coffee for Elections P2 30.04 11/24/2020 101-41410-443990 11/16/2020 Plugs & Cords for Elections 58.93 11/24/2020 101-41410-421990 Check Total: 88.97 Vendor: 4455 HALLIE LEFFINGWELL Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: True #2 Chalk Chalk Art Project final payment 150.00 11/24/2020 101-45204-431990 Check Total: 150.00 Vendor: 5622 ELIZABETH LINDRUD Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: True 11/10/2020 Mileage Reimbursement - Elections 11.62 11/24/2020 101-41410-433100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 7 Check Total: 11.62 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True 32948 resale - beer 450.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 33101 resale - beer 138.65 11/24/2020 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 588.65 Vendor: 5587 MACQUEEN EMERGENCY Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False 16347 Donation- calibration sys. charge dock; cyl. hold 3,294.87 11/24/2020 101-42200-424100 Check Total: 3,294.87 Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: True 22057034 (896) gal. diesel @ $1.92 1,720.53 11/24/2020 101-43120-421200 22057040 (566) gal. unleaded @ $1.59 899.23 11/24/2020 101-43120-421200 Check Total: 2,619.76 Vendor: 1726 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False INV8161858 Office 365 Upgrade - CARES 7,580.00 11/24/2020 702-00000-431990 INV8171344 Contract Payment 11/16/20 - 12/15/20 CSP ELI] 437.50 11/24/2020 702-00000-424100 Check Total: 8,017.50 Vendor: 5624 KELLI MICHEL Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False 11/6/2020 Refund - Cancelled Membership - Moved 62.85 11/24/2020 226-45127-347900 11/6/2020 Refund - Cancelled Membership - Moved - sales 6.45 11/24/2020 226-00000-208100 Check Total: 69.30 Vendor: 4667 MILLNER VINEYARD, LLC Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 211620-157 resale- wine 473.40 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 473.40 Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: True Nov 2020 Monthly Allocation - Nov 2020 5,275.00 11/24/2020 101-45175-444310 Check Total: 5,275.00 Vendor: 1913 NEW FRANCE WINE Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False 162634 resale- wine 240.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 162634 freight 5.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 8 Check Total: 245.00 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: True 24985 Oct 2020 - Technical Assistance - City Projects 8,115.55 11/24/2020 101-41910-431990 24986 202026 - Nuss Concept - Oct 2020 124.60 11/24/2020 101-00000-220110 24986 202030 - Edmonson Ridge Plat/PUD - Oct 202C 3,523.80 11/24/2020 101-00000-220110 24987 Oct 2020 - Technical Assistance - Meetings 150.00 11/24/2020 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 11,913.95 Vendor: 4472 NOVAK FLECK INC Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 11/4/2020 Escrow Refund - 4191 87th Street NE/Featherstc 2,000.00 11/24/2020 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 2,000.00 Vendor: 5426 NOVEL SOLAR TWO LLC Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: True 1460 Solar Rebate Program - Xcel 31,565.00 11/24/2020 101-41310-443992 Check Total: 31,565.00 Vendor: 5393 OERTEL ARCHITECTS Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False 20-32.1 Monticello Public Works Study 2,335.00 11/24/2020 101-43110-431990 Check Total: 2,335.00 Vendor: 5626 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: False 11/17/2020 Closing on Property @ 101, 107, 121 W Broadw 829,000.00 11/24/2020 213-00000-157010 11/17/2020 Fees - Closing on Property @ 101, 107, 121 W E 7,381.03 11/24/2020 213-00000-157010 Check Total: 836,381.03 Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: True 60495 Labor - photo cell button - Streetscape Lights 190.00 11/24/2020 101-43160-440990 60495 Parts- photo cell button - Streetscape Lights 11.67 11/24/2020 101-43160-440990 Check Total: 201.67 Vendor: 1417 OSC OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: True 8391823 cutting and grinding goggles 14.38 11/24/2020 101-45201-421990 Check Total: 14.38 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 6116759 freight 20.86 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6116759 resale- liquor 1,918.15 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 6116760 resale- wine 569.50 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 6116760 freight 20.18 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 6117596 resale- liquor 3,437.75 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 6117596 freight 38.37 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 6117597 resale - wine 1,925.85 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 6117597 resale -liquor 99.25 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 6117597 resale- mix 31.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 6117597 freight 48.53 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 6119418 freight 29.80 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 6119418 resale - liquor 2,668.92 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 6119419 resale - wine 1,750.25 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 6119419 freight 38.74 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 6120164 freight 37.25 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 6120164 resale liquor 1,655.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 6120998 resale liquor 1,757.70 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 6120998 freight 26.82 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 6120999 freight 5.96 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 6120999 resale- mix 135.78 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 6120999 resale -liquor 99.25 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 619275 freight cr. inv. #6117597 -1.38 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 619275 resale - wine cr. inv. #6117597 -72.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 16,241.53 Vendor: 4962 RENGEL PRINTING COMPANY, INC Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True 125093 Fall/Winter Newletter (7,900) 3,112.92 11/24/2020 101-41310-431950 Check Total: 3,112.92 Vendor: 4981 STEVE SCHILLEWAERT Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False 102028 10/2020 Riverside Cemetery lawn mntc.; Fall ch 4,550.00 11/24/2020 651-49010-431050 102029 10/2020 Hillside Cemetery lawn mntc.; Fall clea 850.00 11/24/2020 101-45201-431050 Check Total: 5,400.00 Vendor: 5211 RANDI ANN SMELSER Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False 11/12/2020 Reimbursement - CatLitter (5) 36.98 11/24/2020 101-42700-421990 Nov 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,575.00 11/24/2020 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,611.98 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False 2013968 freight 18.67 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2013968 resale- liquor 1,907.84 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 2013969 resale- wine 1,946.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 2013969 freight 31.03 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 3,903.54 Vendor: 3486 STATE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CORP Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: True 901696458 (2) cs. graffiti remover; (3) cs. wasp spray; cs. al 1,073.65 11/24/2020 101-45201-421990 Check Total: 1,073.65 Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True 763-271-3257 TDS 101.36 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 763-295-0078 TDS 159.93 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 763-295-2005 TDS 20.34 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 763-295-3714 TDS 344.34 11/24/2020 702-00000-432100 Check Total: 625.97 Vendor: 5314 THE LAKOTA GROUP INC Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: True 19028-15 Monticello Comprehensive Plan - Oct 2020 539.20 11/24/2020 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 539.20 Vendor: 5369 TRAVELERS Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 4481EI159 Prepaid Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 67,347.00 11/24/2020 101-00000-155020 4481EI I59 Prepaid Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 2,222.00 11/24/2020 213-00000-155020 4481EI I59 Prepaid Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 318.00 11/24/2020 217-00000-155020 4481EI159 Prepaid Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 14,055.00 11/24/2020 226-00000-155020 4481EI I59 Prepaid Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 6,415.00 11/24/2020 601-00000-155020 4481EI I59 Prepaid Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 6,673.00 11/24/2020 602-00000-155020 4481EI159 Prepaid Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 6,808.00 11/24/2020 609-00000-155020 4481EI159 Prepaid Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 3,457.00 11/24/2020 652-00000-155020 4481E1159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 328.00 11/24/2020 101-41110-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 85.00 11/24/2020 101-41310-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 28.00 11/24/2020 101-41410-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 93.00 11/24/2020 101-41520-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 28.00 11/24/2020 101-41800-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 41.00 11/24/2020 101-41910-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 2,495.00 11/24/2020 101-42200-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 2,586.00 11/24/2020 101-42400-415100 4481EI I59 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 1,442.00 11/24/2020 101-43110-415100 4481EI I59 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 1,094.00 11/24/2020 101-43115-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 5,492.00 11/24/2020 101-43120-415100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 2,474.00 11/24/2020 101-43125-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 1,282.00 11/24/2020 101-43127-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 4,438.00 11/24/2020 101-45201-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 544.00 11/24/2020 101-46102-415100 4481EI I59 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 741.00 11/24/2020 213-46301-415100 4481EI I59 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 106.00 11/24/2020 217-41990-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 1,485.00 11/24/2020 226-45122-415100 4481EI I59 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 1,085.00 11/24/2020 226-45124-415100 4481EI I59 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 2,116.00 11/24/2020 226-45126-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 2,121.00 11/24/2020 601-49440-415100 4481E1159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 18.00 11/24/2020 601-49441-415100 4481E1159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 2,207.00 11/24/2020 602-49490-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 18.00 11/24/2020 602-49491-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 2,270.00 11/24/2020 609-49754-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 159.00 11/24/2020 652-49880-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 371.00 11/24/2020 652-49881-415100 4481EI159 Work Comp Ins 10/10/20 - 10/10/21 624.00 11/24/2020 652-49882-415100 Check Total: 143,066.00 Vendor: 4656 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC. Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 745352 resale - chocolate cups 49.50 11/24/2020 609-49750-425500 745352 resale - gift bags; bottle wraps 39.60 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 89.10 Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 11/9/2020 PI 42 - UB Nov Billing (3691 pcs) (1/2) 848.93 11/24/2020 601-49440-432200 11/9/2020 PI 42 - UB Nov Billing (3691 pcs) (1/2) 848.93 11/24/2020 602-49490-432200 Check Total: 1,697.86 Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L. Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: True 90258530 Dee 2020 - WWTP Operations & Maintenance 62,250.00 11/24/2020 602-49480-430800 Check Total: 62,250.00 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: True 2612929 resale- soda pop 525.80 11/24/2020 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 525.80 Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: True 267362 resale- liquor 268.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 267362 resale- wine 410.75 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 267362 freight 14.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 692.75 Vendor: 5623 LINDA VOLLBRECHT Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 11/6/2020 Refund - Room Rental Cancelled due to COVID 52.60 11/24/2020 226-45123-347010 11/6/2020 Refund - Sales Tax Room Rental Cancelled due 1 5.40 11/24/2020 226-00000-208100 Check Total: 58.00 Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False 8250 Oct. 2020 Water Testing 240.00 11/24/2020 601-49440-431990 Check Total: 240.00 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False 7305777 resale - wine 1,699.12 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 7305777 freight 20.98 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 7306001 resale - wine 496.00 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 7306001 freight 5.96 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 7306252 freight 5.21 11/24/2020 609-49750-433300 7306252 resale - wine 662.68 11/24/2020 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 2,889.95 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: True 11/13/2020 Court Fines & Fees - Oct 2020 3,122.99 11/24/2020 101-42100-430410 November Nov 2020 - Deputies Contract 124,104.50 11/24/2020 101-42100-430500 Check Total: 127,227.49 Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False 202000000075 202024 - Amendment Misc #A 1442784 46.00 11/24/2020 101-41910-430400 202000000075 202027 - Amendment Misc #A 1443064 46.00 11/24/2020 101-41910-430400 202000000075 201920 - Rezoning Proceedings #A 1445325 46.00 11/24/2020 101-41910-430400 202000000075 201933 - Rezoning Proceedings #A 1445326 46.00 11/24/2020 101-41910-430400 202000000075 202015 - Easement #A 1445327 46.00 11/24/2020 101-41910-430400 202000000075 Cert of Completion #A 1443066 46.00 11/24/2020 213-46301-443990 202000000075 Amended Mortgage #A 1443065 46.00 11/24/2020 213-46301-443990 202000000075 Amended CUP #A 1442786 46.00 11/24/2020 101-41910-430400 202000000075 Vacation #A 1442785 46.00 11/24/2020 101-41310-443990 Check Total: 414.00 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Total for Check Run: 1,531,899.00 Total of Number of Checks: 68 The preceding list of bills payable was reveiwed and approved for payment. Date: 11/23/20 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/18/2020 - 11:07 AM) Page 13 City Council Agenda 11/23/2020 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: List of new/terminated employees Name Alex Hoglund Name Title Parks Worker NEW EMPLOYEES Department Hire Date Class Parks TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Reason New Hire and Terms City Council 2020: 11/16/2020 11/30/20 Temporary Department Last Day Class City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus City property (SR) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 21). Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-77 accepting a donation of $300 from New Ulm Brewing & Beverage for general Fire Department use QS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is being asked to approve a donation of $300 from New Ulm Brewing & Beverage for general Fire Department use. Al. Budget Impact: The donations will be used by Fire Department. A2. Staff Workload Impact: NA B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopting Resolution 2020-77 accepting the contributions and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to deny the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2020-77 1 CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2020-77 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DES ON IL I VALUE New Ulm Brewing & Beverage iMsb $300 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and 16, 'AL kL WHEREAS, the City CouncilVhheby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLy t4Counc onticello as follows: 1. The contributions desbo%ve are hereb ace by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be s d ignated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the mon another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY L PURPOSE/AMOUNT New Ulm Brewing & Beverage I General Fire Department Use/$300 Adopted11 11 the City Council of Monticello this 2 rd of November, 2020. Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 2E. Consideration to call for a special meeting on Wednesday, December 30, 2020 at 7:30 a.m. for approval of bills (SR) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Since the City Council only meets once in December, a special council meeting has been held in the past to approve one last check run for the year. This last check run is necessary to pay vendors in a timely manner and to avoid interest charges, late fees, and/or penalties on bills received after the December meeting and due prior to the first meeting in January. Staff is recommending Wednesday, December 30, at 7:30 a.m. for this meeting Al. Budget Impact: By holding a special meeting, this would avoid the City having to pay some interest or late fees on bills that would be received after the cutoff for the December 14, 2020 Council meeting and due prior to the first Council meeting of 2021 on January 11. A2. Staff Workload: None. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to call for a Special Council Meeting on Wednesday, December 30, 2020, at 7:30 a.m. for the purpose of approving bills. 2. Motion for other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None. City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 2F. Consideration of approving adjustments to the MCC part-time pay schedule to meet minimum wage requirements. (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving adjustments to the Monticello Community Center's (MCC) part-time pay schedule to meet minimum wage requirements. Effective January 1, 2021 the minimum wage requirement will increase from $10.00 to $10.08 per hour for adults and from $8.15 to $8.21 per hour for minors. In response to the upcoming minimum wage increase, pay ranges in grades 1-3 were increased on a graduated basis. All other grades were left unchanged. For comparison purposes the attached document includes the current salary schedule and proposed schedule. Implementation: Employees who are currently making less than the minimum wage will have their rate increased to the new minimums and anyone currently making above the minimum wage will receive a pay adjustment at their next performance review. The following are important to note: • As of 2018 the minimum wage is adjusted for cost of living (COLA) each year. • The MCC part-time pay schedules have not typically been included as part of the City's annual market wage adjustment or COLA. The effective date of the new pay scale will be December 19, 2020 to match the City's payroll schedule. Al. Budget Impact: The minimum wage adjustment is a budgeted item for 2021. The impact on the MCC's budget over the next 12 months is approximately $1,661. B1. Staff Workload Impact: Their will be a short-term increase in staff workload to adjust the pay rates of 21 affected employees. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve adjustments to the MCC pay schedule moving employees to appropriate levels as outline above. 2. Motion to approve alternative action. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff along with the Personnel Committee reviewed the proposed recommendations and recommend Alternative 1 approving adjustments to the MCC salary schedules. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 9 Current vs. Proposed Pay Schedule MCC Part -Time Payscale Current Wage Scale Grade 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 M1 $ 8.15 $ 8.31 $ 8.48 $ 8.65 $ 8.82 $ 9.00 $ 9.18 $ 9.36 $ 10.00 $ 10.20 $ 10.40 $ 10.61 $ 10.82 $ 11.04 $ 11.26 $ 11.49 $ 11.72 M2 $ 8.15 $ 8.31 $ 8.48 $ 8.65 $ 8.82 $ 9.00 $ 9.18 $ 9.36 $ 10.05 $ 10.25 $ 10.46 $ 10.67 $ 10.88 $ 11.10 $ 11.32 $ 11.54 $ 11.78 M3 $ 8.15 $ 8.31 $ 8.48 $ 8.65 $ 8.82 $ 9.00 $ 9.18 $ 9.36 $ 10.10 $ 10.30 $ 10.51 $ 10.72 $ 10.93 $ 11.15 $ 11.37 $ 11.60 $ 11.83 M4 $ 10.25 $ 10.46 $ 10.66 $ 10.88 $ 11.09 $ 11.32 $ 11.54 $ 11.77 $ 12.01 M5 $ 10.45 $ 10.66 $ 10.87 $ 11.09 $ 11.31 $ 11.54 $ 11.77 $ 12.00 $ 12.24 M6 $ 11.00 $ 11.22 $ 11.44 $ 11.67 $ 11.91 $ 12.14 $ 12.39 $ 12.64 $ 12.89 M7 $ 13.00 $ 13.26 $ 13.53 $ 13.80 $ 14.07 $ 14.35 $ 14.64 $ 14.93 $ 15.23 $ 15.54 $ 15.85 $ 16.16 M8 $ 20.00 $ 20.40 $ 20.81 $ 21.22 $ 21.65 $ 22.08 $ 22.52 $ 22.97 $ 23.43 Minor Wages Adult Wages Proposed Wage Scale- Effective 12/19/20 Grade 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 M1 $ 8.21 $ 8.37 $ 8.54 $ 8.71 $ 8.89 $ 9.06 $ 9.25 $ 9.43 $ 10.08 $ 10.28 $ 10.49 $ 10.70 $ 10.91 $ 11.13 $ 11.35 $ 11.58 $ 11.81 M2 $ 8.21 $ 8.37 $ 8.54 $ 8.71 $ 8.89 $ 9.06 $ 9.25 $ 9.43 $ 10.13 $ 10.33 $ 10.54 $ 10.75 $ 10.97 $ 11.18 $ 11.41 $ 11.64 $ 11.87 M3 $ 8.21 $ 8.37 $ 8.54 $ 8.71 $ 8.89 $ 9.06 $ 9.25 $ 9.43 $ 10.15 $ 10.35 $ 10.56 $ 10.77 $ 10.99 $ 11.21 $ 11.43 $ 11.66 $ 11.89 M4 $ 10.25 $ 10.46 $ 10.66 $ 10.88 $ 11.09 $ 11.32 $ 11.54 $ 11.77 $ 12.01 M5 $ 10.45 $ 10.66 $ 10.87 $ 11.09 $ 11.31 $ 11.54 $ 11.77 $ 12.00 $ 12.24 M6 $ 11.00 $ 11.22 $ 11.44 $ 11.67 $ 11.91 $ 12.14 $ 12.39 $ 12.64 $ 12.89 M7 $ 13.00 $ 13.26 $ 13.53 $ 13.80 $ 14.07 $ 14.35 $ 14.64 $ 14.93 $ 15.23 $ 15.54 $ 15.85 $ 16.16 M8 $ 20.00 $ 20.40 $ 20.81 $ 21.22 $ 21.65 $ 22.08 $ 22.52 $ 22.97 $ 23.43 Minor Wages Adult Wages New minimums effective 1/1/21- $10.08 and $8.21 'ositions hildcare Aide Attendant =limbing Wall, Program Asst., Sp. Event Attendant 3uest Service, Event Decorator, Ice Arena Attendant, BF Concession 3uilding Att., FM Cashier, BF Concession Server, Adm Asst. 'rogram Instructor, WSI Aid, Lifeguard _eague Sp., Facility Lead, Fitness Sp, Program Sp, Membership Sp, WSI 3roup Fitness Instructor 'ositions hildcare Aide Attendant limbing Wall, Program Asst., Sp. Event Attendant 3uest Service, Event Decorator, Ice Arena Attendant, BF Concession Att. 3uilding Att., FM Cashier, BF Concession Server, Adm Asst. 'rogram Instructor, WSI Aid, Lifeguard _eague Sp., Facility Lead, Fitness Sp, Program Sp, WSI 3roup Fitness Instructor City Council Agenda: 11/23/20 2G. Consideration of approving City Administrator Employment Agreement between the City of Monticello and Rachel Leonard (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving the attached City Administrator Employment Agreement between the City of Monticello and Rachel Leonard. Based on direction given at a City Council workshop in October, the negotiations team entered into contract negotiations with City Administrator candidate, Rachel Leonard. After some back and forth on terms (start date, salary and benefits, and review schedule) both parties have reached agreement and are satisfied with the terms outlined in the attached contract. Below are highlights of the proposed contract and additional detail regarding the transition: • Annual Salary- $116,312.05 (Step 1 of scale) with opportunity for first potential increase at 6 months. • Leonard will assume the role on December 5, 2020 prior to back -filling her own position. The Communications Coordinator position will be filled as soon as possible after assuming the City Administrator role. • The City shall provide reimbursement up to $800 every three (3) years for the purchase of a cell phone to be used for City business. A monthly cell phone stipend will also be paid matching the non-union stipend amount for voice, text and data. • The contract awards Leonard six (6) months' salary and benefits if the City terminates her employment and she is willing and able to perform the duties. However, in the event Leonard is terminated because of her malfeasance in office, gross misconduct, conviction for a felony, or conviction for an illegal act involving personal gain to Employee, then the City shall have no obligation to pay the termination benefits. • In conjunction with Leonard assuming the City Administrator role on December 5, Jeff O'Neill will assume a new role outside the office as City Administrator, Emeritus (honorary retirement from city administrator duties) thru his last day of work on March 1, 2021. Al. Budget Impact: While the 2020 budget doesn't contain a budgeted amount for overlap in City Administrator salaries, there is money available within the current budget and the 2021 budget to cover the additional cost of overlap during O'Neill's transition into retirement. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve City Administrator Employment Agreement between the City of Monticello and Rachel Leonard. City Council Agenda: 11/23/20 2. Motion to approve City Administrator Employment Agreement between the City of Monticello and Rachel Leonard with modified terms. 3. Motion to deny approval of the City Administrator Employment Agreement. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The negotiations team recommends Alternative #1. The proposed contract was reviewed by the City Attorney and is in line with other City Administrator contracts. Jeff O'Neill has also been consulted with on his new role as City Administrator, Emeritus and is supportive of stepping away from his current duties and allowing Leonard to take the City Administrator reigns on December 5. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Proposed City Administrator Employment Agreement- RL 2 City of Monticello, Minnesota City Administrator Employment Agreement AGREEMENT made this 23th day of November, 2020, by and between the CITY OF Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Employer"), and Rachel Leonard ("Employee"). The parties agree as follows: 1. POSITION. Employer agrees to employ Employee as its City Administrator. Employee agrees to serve as City Administrator in accordance with state statutes, City ordinances and the Code of Ethics of the International and Minnesota City/County Management Associations, and to perform such other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Council shall from time to time assign. 2. PENSION PLAN. Employer shall contribute to PERA as required by State law for Employee or an alternate pension plan, if selected by Employee, authorized by State law. 3. SALARY. Employer shall pay Employee a salary of $116,312.05 per year (step 1, grade 260 of pay equity compensation program) beginning upon commencement of duties on December 5, 2020. Apart from potential annual performance increases, Employee shall be provided compensation increases in an amount equal to the cost of living related increases or adjustments granted to non-union City workforce, or as required to implement modifications to the City pay equity compensation program. 4. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS. Employer and Employee agree that an initial informal check-in meeting will be conducted between the City Council and the Employee at three (3) months for the purpose of providing feedback and discussing expectations for the first 12 months. Formal performance reviews will be conducted on Employee after six (6) months, twelve (12) months, and annually thereafter. The Employer agrees to consider a minimum 1/2 step increase in compensation to the Employee dependent upon the results of the six (6) month performance evaluation. If at six (6) months a'/2 step vs. a full step increase is awarded, the Employer agrees to consider an additional '/2 step increase dependent upon the results of the twelve (12) month performance evaluation. Future increases in compensation will be considered dependent upon the results of performance evaluations annually thereafter. Performance reviews shall be conducted in accordance with specified criteria developed jointly by the Employee and the Human Resources Manager, and City Council. As part of the performance review process the City Council and Employee shall jointly define in writing the goals and performance objectives for the Employee to ensure proper operation of the City and the attainment of the Council's policy objectives, and shall further 1 establish a relative priority among those various goals and objectives. The goals and objectives should generally be attainable within the time limitations as specified and the annual operation and capital budgets and appropriations provided. 5. SENIORITY. For purposes of employment benefits such as Paid Time Off (PTO), and the like, Employee will be given service credit dating back to May 19, 2014 upon his/her first day of employment. 6. PAID TIME OFF (PTO). Effective on their first day of employment as City Administrator Employee shall transition to exempt PTO schedule with annual service credit for time employed as a non-exempt employee. In addition, Employee shall accrue PTO in accordance with the City's personnel policies. 7. HOLIDAYS. Employer shall provide Employee the same holidays as enjoyed by other non-union employees. 8. GENERAL INSURANCE. Employer shall provide Employee the same group medical, dental, life and disability insurance benefits as provided to all other non-union employees. 9. CELL PHONE STIPEND. The City shall provide reimbursement up to $800 every three (3) years for the purchase of a cell phone to be used for City business. The City agrees to provide a monthly cell phone stipend at the same level of non-union City staff to cover the cost of maintaining a plan including, voice, text and data. 10. DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS. Employer shall budget and pay the professional dues and subscriptions for Employee which are deemed reasonable and necessary for Employee's continued participation in national, regional, state and local associations necessary and desirable for Employee's continued professional participation, growth and advancement. 11. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. Employer shall budget and pay necessary and reasonable registration, travel and subsistence expenses of Employee for professional and official travel, meetings and occasions adequate to continue the professional development of Employee and to adequately pursue necessary official and other committees thereof which Employee serves as a member. Employee shall use good judgment in his/her outside activities so he/she will not neglect his primary duties to the Employer. 12. CIVIC CLUB MEMBERSHIP. Employer recognizes the desirability of representation in and before local civic and other organizations. Employee is authorized to become a member of such civic clubs or organizations as deemed appropriate by Employee and Employer; and at Employer's expense. 13. GENERAL EXPENSES. Employer shall reimburse Employee reasonable miscellaneous job-related expenses which it is anticipated Employee will incur from time to time when provided appropriate documentation. 2 14. HOURS OF WORK. It is understood the position of City Administrator requires attendance at evening meetings and occasionally at weekend meetings. It is understood by Employee that additional compensation and compensatory time shall not be allowed for such additional expenditures of time. It is further understood that Employee may absent herself from the office to a reasonable extent in consideration of extraordinary time expenditures for evening and weekend meetings at other than normal working hours. 15. TERMINATION BENEFITS. In the event Employee is terminated by the Employer during such time that Employee is willing and able to perform the duties of City Administrator, then in that event, Employer agrees to pay Employee at the time of receipt of his/her last paycheck a lump sum cash payment equal to six (6) months aggregate salary and to continue to provide and pay for the benefits set forth in paragraph 8 for a period of six (6) months following termination. However, in the event Employee is terminated because of her malfeasance in office, gross misconduct, conviction for a felony, or conviction for an illegal act involving personal gain to Employee, then Employer shall have no obligation to pay the termination benefits. If Employer at any time during the employment term reduces the salary or other financial benefits of Employee in a greater percentage than across-the-board reduction for all non-union employees, or if Employer refuses, following written notice, to comply with any other provisions of this Agreement benefiting Employee or Employee resigns following a formal suggestion by Employer that she resign, then Employee may, at her option, be deemed to be "terminated" on the effective date of Employee's resignation and the Employee shall also be entitled to receive the termination benefits set forth above. If Employee voluntarily resigns her position with Employer, Employee agrees to give the Employer thirty (30) days advance notice. If Employee voluntarily resigns her position with Employer, there shall be no termination pay due to Employee. 16. PERSONNEL POLICIES. Except where specifically abridged or modified by this Agreement, the City's personnel policies as set forth in the City's Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual shall apply to Employee. 17. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of Employer to terminate the services of Employee at any time, for any reason, subject only to the provisions of this Agreement and statutory requirements. Furthermore, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of Employee to resign at any time from her position with Employer, subject only to the provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer has caused this Agreement to be signed and executed on its behalf by its Mayor and Human Resources Manager and Rachel Leonard, and Employee has signed this Agreement, in duplicate, the day and year first written above. EMPLOYER: EMPLOYEE: CITY OF Monticello I� Its Mayor /1 0 Its Human Resources Manager j9 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 2H. Consideration of authorizing expenditures in the amount of up to $7,000 for grant writing services in connection with the MN -DEED Community Energy Transition Grant Program (CET) and also adopting Resolution 2020-80 authorizing submittal of a CET Grant application to MN -DEED in an amount up to $500,000 (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is being asked to authorize expenditures of up to $7,000 for grant writing assistance and further authorize submittal of a Community Energy Transition (CET) Grant Program application to MN -DEED in an amount up to $500,000. The MN -DEED CET Grant Program is a newly created funding assistance initiative to support Minnesota communities where major power generating facilities have recently closed or are scheduled to close in coming years. Grants can be used for a variety of purposes as noted below: The CET grant program assists eligible communities with developing a plan to address the economic and social impact associated with the closing of a local electric generating plant. Plans may include, but are not limited to, researching, planning, and implementing activities designed to: 1. Assist workers at the plant find new employment, including worker retraining and developing small business start-up skills; 2. Increase the eligible community's property tax base; and 3. Develop alternative economic development strategies to attract new employers to the eligible community. Since Xcel Energy's Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) currently pays approximately 55 percent of the City's property taxes, is a major employment hub (approximately 630 workers located at the site) and is facing license expiration in 2030, staff believe the CET grant program may be helpful in preparing for a future without MNGP. More specifically, the grant funds may help in planning and research efforts that support goals of further developing strategies to attract new employers as well as pursuing activities to increase the City's tax base and employment levels. The funds that are available through the competitive CET Grants can be used to complete environmental studies, design road networks and municipal infrastructure services as well as the actual purchase of land related to potential new industrial park development. Funding can also be used to create new marketing materials or hire a lobbying firm to carry the message that the City desires to its legislative representatives and bodies regarding the City's needs. The grant submittal requires a detailed budget and specific multi-year timeline to achieve the various objectives identified as major work elements in the grant. The scoring is based on the following items: Project Scope, Timing, Financing, Economic Impact, Community Impact and Partnerships and Collaboration Staff only recently were able to discuss several potential best project scope components and, as a result, have some general consensus ideas. Staff proposes to focus on finalizing plans for industrial development objectives identified in the draft Monticello 2040 + Comprehensive City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 Plan with additional discussion needed to firm up the additional work scope details. As for the grant writing assistance, it is proposed that staff will seek quotes (professional services) and evaluate them based on criteria including familiarity with MN -DEED grant programs and past experience in completing such applications. The quote proposals will also be rated as to price and familiarity with the City of Monticello and its development conditions and overall objectives. A final note is that the CET Grant application process is competitive and submittals are due on January 4, 2021. Al. STAFF IMPACT: Community Development Department and City Administration staff have a small amount of time committed to the grant submittal effort to date. The CET program was just recently rolled out by MN -DEED and there is more review of the grant application materials that needs to be completed. Given the short time frame to prepare the grant and regular workload items, staff believe it is a wise move to involve a professional grant writer to assist in preparing the grant application. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is a modest budgetary impact related to consideration of the Resolution of support for submittal of an application for the CET program to MN - DEED. In-house staff will be able to complete a portion of the work though it could become a sizable application and it is believed that a professional grant writer could best help complete the submittal document packet. The cost is not expected to exceed $7,000 and could actually be lower. Funding is available in the EDA General Fund budget and the Community Development Department Planning budget. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve expenditures of up to $7,000 from City funds for grant writing assistance and also adopting Resolution 2020-80 further authorizing submittal of a Community Energy Transitions (CET) Grant application to MN -DEED in the amount of up to $500,000 to be used to develop plans and implement strategies for the eventual closure of the MNGP. 2. Motion to deny approval of expenditures of up to $7,000 from City funds for grant writing assistance services and also adopting Resolution 2020-80 further authorizing submittal of a Community Energy Transitions (CET) Grant application to MN -DEED in the amount of up to $500,000 to be used to develop plans and implement strategies for the eventual closure of the MNGP. 3. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. The CET Grant program is a new funding assistance initiative that was recently approved by the legislature. It is intended to help Minnesota communities like Monticello that are faced with the eventual closure of major power generating facilities that play an outsized role in the economic and social fabric of the host locations. It is a competitive program and there are limited funds. Several other host power facility communities that were on the webinar with City staff indicated that they would be submitting application to MN -DEED. If the City Council approves of the grant writing expenditures and the submittal of the CET Grant application, staff can present the preliminary grant application scope to the City Council at a future meeting prior to sending it to MN - Pa City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 DEED on January 4, 2021. Staff would further note that this is just one component of a more comprehensive strategy for Monticello's transition efforts. The comprehensive strategy is a work in progress and will required continued involvement by the City Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2020-80 B. CET Grant Application Forms: https://mn.gov/deed/govern hent/financial- assistance/community-funding/community -ey nergyjsp CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2020-80 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF A COMMUNITY ENERGY TRANSITION (CET) GRANT APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (MN -DEED) IN THE AMOUNT OF $500,000 A& WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is a Community under Minnesota Statute § 116J.55; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Monticello intends to act as the legal Sponsor for project(s) contained in the Community Energy Transition Grant Program to be submitted on January 4, 2021 and that the Mayor is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City of Monticello has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVENbr, f Monticello has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraugr kbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLV> D that upon ap roval o pplication by the state, the City of Monticello may enter into an agre ment with the State of Minnesota for the above referenced project(s), and that the Mayor certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all grant contract agreements., NOWy THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY LVED that the Mayor and the City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project onehalf of the applicant. I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello on November 23, 2020. SIGNED: Mayor WITNESSED: City Clerk (Date) (Date) City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 2I. Consideration of authorizing Fire Department to purchase new Command Vehicle. (MM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Update as of 11/18/20. At the direction of Mayor Stumpf, Chief Mossey contacted the two local dealers to see if they could revisit their quotes and do any better for the pricing of this vehicle. Cornerstone Chevrolet was not willing to move on their price for this vehicle and is $13,336 more than Morries for their Suburban. West Metro was contacted multiple times, and conversations were had that they were going to revisit their numbers but did not sound like they would be able to move much if at all. They currently have not gotten back to us after multiple attempts. One note is that this vehicle's replacement is based on the safety factor. The number one rated vehicle by the NHTSA was the Ford Expedition. We would definitely prefer this vehicle because of that and it is just easier anyway with the lower pricing of all the quotes. City Council is asked to authorize the purchase of a new command vehicle from Morries Buffalo Ford Dealership for a total cost of $65,340.96 Requests for pricing for the vehicle was sent out to 3 dealerships besides the state bid contract. The State Bid pricing was $570 more than Morries Buffalo Ford. Morries also was $5281 cheaper than the next closest bid from a Monticello Dealer. Due to pricing differences we decided to purchase from Morries Buffalo Ford. We also purchased our last utility truck from the same dealership. The details of this purchase were outlined in the agenda item from September 28, 2020 when authorization to proceed with the purchase process of this replacement vehicle. The problem with the current vehicle is it is the smallest and least safe of our fleet, even though it responds to the majority of our calls. It was a standard Chevrolet Trailblazer that was not ever designed for emergency response, other than adding a radio and the light package. Safety is the number one concern of our department with everything we do, and this vehicle should not be the exception. We have been planning to replace this now for many years since the duty officer program started showing such positive results, and the time has come to upgrade to a better and safer response vehicle. During the research part of the purchase process, we evaluated each vehicle by its safety rating first and foremost. The Ford Expedition was not only the least expensive option, but also had a significantly higher overall safety rating than any other comparable size SUV. Because this vehicle is a standard packaged vehicle with no upgraded options, there were no similar pre -owned models available with less than 40,000 miles so we propose to purchase a new model and take advantage of the competitively priced exact model we desire. The existing trailblazer will likely be repurposed amongst other City Departments in need of a smaller transit type vehicle. There has been some desire to use it for the new City Maintenance Position. There have been other departments asking for such a vehicle during budget workshops and this may be able to fulfill that need also. City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 The truck will be ordered with expected delivery in early 2021. The CIP originally identified the cost at $75,000. Through competitive bids we were able to get this entire truck completed for much less than originally figured. Al. Budget Impact: This Fire Department item is included in the proposed 2021 budget as a purchase through the Central Equipment Fund. The Central Equipment Fund is an internal service fund that provides financing for governmental fund (General Fund) capital equipment purchases of $10,000 or more. The Central Equipment Fund recovers equipment costs through annual lease payments from the benefitting department. The annual recovery for this purchase is $12,100. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time necessary to order vehicle and finance department to handle the financial portion of transaction. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize the purchase the 2021 Expedition from Morries Ford 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends Alternative #1 D. SUPPORTING DATA: City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 2J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2020-82 accepting public improvements for Featherstone 4th Addition (ML/RM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The plat of Featherstone 4th Addition included developer construction of public improvements including street, sidewalk, trail, signs, mailboxes, street lights and utilities. Final completion of these public improvements occurred recently and the improvements have been inspected, tested and approved by the engineering department and public works in conformance with the City's standard specifications. Per the development agreement, the developer originally provided a security for these public improvements, to ensure completion, in the amount of $1,079,696.93 that was reduced to $194,312.80 when the improvements were partially complete. It is now recommended to accept these improvements and release the remaining letter of credit for the public improvement work. The developer's contractor, Latour Construction will provide a 2- year warranty bond for the public improvements starting from the date of Council acceptance. It should be noted that erosion control and landscaping securities will continue to be retained at this time. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Impacts to staff workload will be minimal and routine for the project. A. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2020-82 accepting public improvements for the Featherstone 4th Addition plat. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2020-82 at this time B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. C. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2020-82 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2020-82 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FEATHERSTONE 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, pursuant to a contract with the City of Monticello, Latour Construction was awarded the Featherstone 4th Addition public improvement project.; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved and that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the finalpay t on such contract subject to receipt of the following: 1) Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC 1341; �.& 2) Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured; 3) Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the 4) Two year maintenance bond to City Council. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City two years from tie by reasons of the 23rd day of November, 2020. Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk project by the CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 4A. Consideration to approve a Development Stage Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary Plat for a 54 lot detached single-family subdivision. Applicant: Shawn Weinand/LSW Investments (NAC) Property: Legal: The South 933 feet of the East 933 feet of the Northwest Quarter both measured at right angles thereof Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. Address: 8617 Edmonson Ave NE I PID: 213-100- 232400 Planning Case Number: 2020-029 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the guided use of the subject property from "Urban Reserve" to "Places to Live": The Comprehensive Plan amendment request hearing was held by the Planning Commission on November 2n The City Council will consider any applicable Comprehensive Plan amendment with the Rezoning, Final Stage PUD and Final Plat consideration at a later date. Rezoning from Agriculture (Wright County/Township Zoning) to PUD, Planned Unit Development: The Rezoning request hearing was held by the Planning Commission on November 2n The City Council will consider the Rezoning with the Final Stage PUD and Final Plat consideration at a later date. Development Stage Planned Unit Development Preliminary and Final Plat for a 54 -unit single family residential subdivision entitled "Edmonson Ridge." The subdivision is to be comprised of 54 single family residential lots. The City Council will consider the Final Plat with the Rezoning and Final Stage PUD consideration at a later date. Deadline for Decision: December 6th, 2020 Land Use Designation: "Places to Live" (Re -guided from "Urban Reserve") (Proposed) City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 Zoning Designation: Existing: GA (General Agricultural — Wright County/MOAA Zoning), Guided Transition Area (Wright County Long Range Land Use) Proposed: PUD, Planned Unit Development District Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non-residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district N/A AgriculturalNacant Low Density Residential (Featherstone) Monticello Township (Residential & Agriculture) Monticello Township (Residential & Agriculture) Low Density Residential (Featherstone) Project Description: The applicants are proposing to plat (and rezone) 54 detached single-family lots. The current property is located in Monticello Township and the applicant has petitioned for an orderly annexation into the City. The Land Use Map shows the area as "Urban Reserve" and the City will need to process a comprehensive plan amendment changing the land use to "Places to Live". The applicant wishes to rezone the property to Planned Unit Development. The development configuration meets the majority of the base zoning standards found in the City's T -N (Traditional Neighborhood) District and is at a density which meets both the City's R-1 and T -N standards. T -N is a single-family residential district, which allows densities of up to 4.4 units per gross acre. A Homeowners Association would be formed to manage maintenance of some common trail and the neighborhood monument sign at the corner of 85th and Edmonson, and the developer is seeking 2 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 driveways slightly wider than allowed by the T -N District — otherwise the project is generally consistent with the base T -N standards found within the zoning ordinance. ANALYSIS Comments related to the Planning Commission's review and comments on revised plans submitted by the applicant are in bold italics. Council will note that the applicant has also submitted revised preliminary plat and PUD plans to address some of the conditions within Exhibit Z. The revised plans are included in Council's packet. The prior plans can be accessed via the November Planning Commission agenda. Comprehensive Plan Amendment As noted above, the Comprehensive Plan amendment request hearing was held by the Planning Commission on November 2n The City Council will consider any applicable Comprehensive Plan amendment with the Rezoning, Final Stage PUD and Final Plat consideration at a later date. The analysis is included here for context. The subject site is presently guided "Urban Reserve". The City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan anticipates that the community will grow into areas designated as "Urban Reserve" as planned land use areas become fully developed and capacity for future growth is needed. In the case of this parcel, it is directly adjacent to the existing Featherstone development to the west and north and municipal utilities are readily accessible to the site. The specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan call for a variety of housing types that respond to changing demographics and encourage mixed housing styles where appropriate to provide for life -cycle housing choice. The Plan notes that higher density housing is most appropriate where there are available private and public services that will facilitate attractive neighborhoods for those residents. At the boundaries of the community, land transitions to rural open space. In these locations, lower densities are appropriate, as in the case of this proposal, along with attention to the Plan's direction to integrate natural resources into the developed neighborhoods. Connections to the City's parks and open space system through preservation of access to natural features, and trail connections to existing parks facilities, are also encouraged. To accommodate the proposed low-density residential use, the guided use of the subject 20 -acre site must be changed from "Urban Reserve" to "Places to Live". The "Places to Live" land use category designates areas where housing is intended to be the primary use of land. The emphasis of the category is to help ensure that Monticello offers a full range of housing choices, while preserving and enhancing the quality of neighborhoods. While a decision regarding the proposed land use change is considered a policy matter to be determined by City Officials, Staff believes that low density residential use of the property is compatible with uses which are envisioned in the area and with 3 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 the "Places to Live" designation. With 54 units on 20 acres — an average gross density of 2.7 units per acre — the proposed project would qualify as low density, even with the smaller lot configuration. As a comparison, the currently platted Featherstone areas to the north and west, excluding parkland, are developed at approximately 2.0 units per acre. Rezoning The Rezoning request hearing was held by the Planning Commission on November 2n The City Council will consider the Rezoning with the Final Stage PUD and Final Plat consideration at a later date. As noted, the applicant is seeking to have the site zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development upon its annexation into the City. The subject area is guided "Urban Reserve". Many properties in the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area are held in reserve in terms of their designations until the City has determined the proper designation under a development scenario. Concurrent with approval of the Final Plat, the City Council may adopt the rezoning ordinance establishing the PUD Zoning District over the new platted area. Low density residential use of the subject property is compatible with uses which are envisioned in the area. The plat and development standards meet the majority of those for the City's single-family Traditional Neighborhood (T -N) District. A discussion of the PUD zoning follows below. Plan and Plat Review Existing Conditions The project is occurring on a site previously utilized by the City's Public Works Department for storage. The City previously conveyed the property to the developer. It is currently being utilized for agriculture and has a metal shed on the property that will be removed as apart of the project. Streets and Access Primary access to the subdivision is provided from a northerly connection to 87th Street NE and a western access point off of Ebersole Avenue. Because both 85th Street and Edmonson Avenue are designated as collector roadways, no direct access is permitted to those roads due to intersection spacing requirements and proximity to the 85th/Edmonson intersection. As such, the internal connections through the Featherstone development will serve as the exclusive connection points. In a comment from the County's Highway Department, the County is seeking an additional dedication of right of way for Edmonson Avenue, a County road in the area adjacent to this plat. The City believes that the roadway will be turned back to City jurisdiction in the not too distant future, and believes that the dedication area shown on the plat is adequate, with one exception for additional right of way at the corner of Edmonson and 85th. If the County's position prevails, the right of way and trail will be located within 20 feet of the rear of several lots along the east side of the plat. This is still consistent with the T -N District requirement of a 20 foot rear yard setback. C! City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 In follow-up between the County and City Engineer, the County has confirmed that they will accept a 55' right of way width as shown on the proposed preliminary plat, with additional right of way platted at the corner for the potential future need for a roundabout. This will allow the rear yards to remain at approximately 30' in the majority. Council will note that the proposed development plans do not include the upgrade of Edmonson and 85th Street from the current rural to an urban section. The sections in place are consistent with those for Featherstone to the east and north. As discussed previously with the Council, subdivision along collector routes north of School Boulevard are required to complete urban section reconstruction with development, while collector routes south of School Boulevard remain as rural sections. The city will need to develop financing mechanisms and programs to reconstruct these routes in the future. Block Layout The proposed block layout responds well to the site topography and Blocks 1 and 3 meet the maximum 1,320 -foot block length requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. Block 2 exceeds the maximum block length requirements, but the length is broken up by Outlot A and Outlot B which provide trail to access Edmonson Ave, and 85th St. As such, it is consistent with the intent of the subdivision ordinance regulations on block length. In discussing the trail width for the outlots with the developer, it is possible that one of the outlots will be eliminated to meet the required width. The remaining outlot will still accomplish the block length break-up noted above. Lot Sizes & Setbacks The proposed plat has lot sizes that range in area from 6,885 square feet to more than 32,000 square feet. There are two lots proposed which fall under the T -N minimum of 7,500 square feet. The median lot area is approximately 10,600 square feet — again meeting the base density requirement of the T -N District. The largest lots include significant areas of stormwater control. Lot widths range from a minimum width of 54 feet with a few at more than 100 feet. The T -N District minimum lot width is 45 feet. The following table provides a comparison in the design standards for the lots: Standard = T -N District Proposed Plat/PUD Minimum Lot Area 7,500 Median of 10,600 Minimum Lot Width 45' S4'-100' Minimum Front Setback 25' 25' Minimum Rear Setback 20' 30', ROW requirements may adjust some lots along Edmonson to 20' Side Yard Setback Interior 6 7' Side Yard Setback Street 25' 30' The side yard setbacks do provide space to accommodate the required drainage and utility easement around each of the buildings. 5 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 As a noted, the front yard setback will reduce the "face to face" building dimension from 120 feet for a typical R-1 development to 110 feet in this project — a relatively insignificant difference, provided adequate front yard planting and landscape areas are maintained. The driveway depth of 25 feet will still accommodate vehicle parking without extending onto the public boulevard space. However, it is noted that the narrower lots, and potentially 30 foot wide driveways will constrict the availability of on -street visitor parking. Because the streets are public, there will be no common visitor parking areas. Particularly as mailbox clusters are located throughout the project, it will be important to be able to identify available accommodations for visitor parking on - street, as the shorter driveways, narrower lots, and driveway widths combine to limit these locations. Lot Design The following lots have driveway width concerns: Block 1, Lots 7-12 Block 2, Lots 13-21 Block 3, Lots 1-4, 14-19. On some lots, the lot drawings show the driveways appearing to enter the front living space than the garage space. The applicant will need to show the width of the driveways and where they are entering in regard to the garage. Further, the plat needs to demonstrate where on street parking and mailbox clusters would occur. Due to the proximity of the curb cuts, overflow visitor parking site restrictions exist. The site plan has been revised to illustrate proper driveway alignment. The applicant has also provided an illustration demonstrating all on -street parking locations. There are also a few odd shaped lots that present concerns on the angle the driveway comes to the street. Specifically, Lots 2 and 3 on Block 1, Lot 14 on Block 3, and Lot 21 on Block 2 have driveways that enter the street at an angle — perpendicular entrances would be preferred for visibility of vehicles backing out of driveways onto the public street. Finally, the rear lot line configurations for Lots 4, 5, and 6 on Block 3 create some difficult internal corners. These lots should be revised to avoid internal lot corners and straight side lot line layout. The preliminary plat has been revised to correct the lot configurations as recommended. Building Design The applicant is proposing a variety of housing designs with the majority of the homes designed to have two car garages, although several are designed to allow for three car garages. The applicant is proposing multiple home designs to provide a tiering experience for storage space and proposed walkout basements. This will provide a variety of housing designs while maintaining a similar fagade on the outside R City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 of the home except for differences in colors, materials and garage size. The developer will need to provide full floor plans with the Final Stage PUD to verify compliance with the T -N minimum standards of 1,050 square foot foundation and 2000 square feet finishable. The applicant's narrative does note that the units will be sized between 1250 and 3500 square feet. Any units not meeting the 2,000 square foot finishable T -N standard would be considered part of the requested PUD flexibility. To offset this flexibility, the developer is proposing a significant break-up of front facade in terms of material finish and orientation. The zoning ordinance requires a garage of no less than 450 square feet in R-2 district (the T -N district requires a minimum of 480 square feet). The three car garages in the plans will easily meet the minimum. Two car garages should be required to adhere to the R-2 standard of 450 square feet, given the lot size, width, and setback accommodations of the project. Floor plans for the various units are anticipated as a later submission with the final stage PUD to permit verification of this square footage. Easements The applicant's Preliminary Plat shows typical drainage and utility easements along the perimeter of all lots, in addition to covering the existing stormwater pond noted above. The detail shows the easements as 6 feet interior, and 12 feet along streets and at the perimeter of the plat, consistent with City requirements. Sidewalks The applicant has proposed sidewalks along Edmonson Way with a connection to 87th Street to the north and Ebersole Avenue to the west. The applicant also proposes a private wood chip trail through the rear yards of properties on Block 3. This will limit the size of backyards for the property owners in this area and raise the potential for owners' complaints in the future. In addition, there is no sidewalk on 86th Street NE except for the connection to existing sidewalk to the North. Sidewalk installation along at least one side of all local streets is a requirement of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The applicant should remove the private trail through Block 3 and instead provide a sidewalk along the entirety of 86th Street NE connecting to the proposed connection coming off Edmonson Way. The applicant has provided a revised preliminary plat plan package which illustrates the removal of the center trail and the addition of the requested sidewalk. Trails Trail connections to the adjoining Edmonson Avenue and 85th Street NE are proposed within Outlots A & B. These are connections to the trails along Edmonson Avenue and 85th Street NE and are shown to be 10' bituminous trails within 20' wide outlots. Staff has the following recommendations: Public outlots for trails. Staff recommends a minimum of 30 feet width, rather than the 20 feet proposed. The 30 foot width is based on City experience with similar side -yard trails, for maintenance and separation between private and public spaces. 7 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 In the alternative, the applicant may choose to locate one such connecting outlot/trail near the southeast corner of the plat meeting the 30 foot dimension, ensuring convenient pedestrian access to the regional pathway system. 2. Internal trail — HOA owned and maintained - should be eliminated and replaced by public sidewalk along 86th Street as noted above. Final recommendations on pathways and park are subject to the recommendations of the PARC, which will be meeting on November 10th to review the plat. The PARC recommended approval of park dedication as a cash in lieu dedication, to include construction cost credit for the 851h and Edmonson pathways. It is likely that the cost of construction will exceed the required cash in lieu dedication amount of $33,000. Any additional credit will come from the park dedication fund and will be based on actual construction cost. Landscaping A landscaping plan has been submitted for review which includes at least two trees to be planted per lot per typical R-1 single-family standards, as well as a number of other tree planting areas in prominent locations throughout the project. The Zoning Ordinance requires that the trees attributable to the subdivision be planted in the boulevard of each parcel, between the front lot line and the street, or between the sidewalk and the street where sidewalks are included. The Ordinance also states that, for lots with frontage on more than one right-of-way and if no trees are in existence, four trees must be planted per platted lot. For single-family detached and multi -family dwellings with less than 5 units, lots must have 4 aggregate caliper inches (ACI) of canopy trees. The developer should also specify whether any additional individual unit plantings are proposed consistent with the T -N District. The landscaping provisions of the Zoning Ordinance also state that provided trees, shrubs and groundcovers (or grasses) should achieve the following objectives: 1. Establish naturalized woodland areas in large spaces. 2. Establish naturalized areas around stormwater ponds. 3. Establish naturalized woodland areas at the edges of subdivisions, particularly in areas of land use changes or where the subdivision abuts a major roadway, utility line, or railroad. 4. The Parks staff recommends use of native species wherever practical. The Ordinance also stipulates that the landscaping plan must be accompanied by a reliable estimate of installation costs. Specifically, the Ordinance states that subdividers must provide a financial security that guarantees live growth of the plant materials for a two (2) year period from the date of installation. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, the following landscaping -related conditions should be satisfied: 1. The applicant shall be required to provide a financial security which guarantees live growth of the plant materials for a two (2) year period from the date of installation. M. City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 Park Dedication The Subdivision Ordinance specifies a requirement of 11 % of the land area, or an equal contribution based on the land value no later than at the time of final plat. Where the applicants provide a proportion of the land area, the remaining portion would be required as cash, or as credit against the cash contribution, usually in the form of trail construction that is not otherwise required as a part of the street improvements. The plat does not show any dedication of land, but does provide for the construction of two 10' bituminous pathways along Edmonson and 85th Streets. The City has in the past provided construction cost credit for pathways along collector routes in residential areas where internal sidewalks are required and connections between the two systems are provided. The City's Parks Commission will make a recommendation relating to the provision of parkland as a part of the project as noted above. Please see PARC recommendation above in the Trail section. Grading, Drainage and Utilities The proposal has two infiltration basins located in the northwest and the southwest portions of the plat. The following staff comments apply: 1. Conservation Easement signs need to be placed along the basins, subject to the City Engineer's recommendations. 2. Basins will need an access point for Maintenance as required by the City's Public Works department. The City's Engineering Department has provided a comment letter with additional comments. Engineering Issues The acceptability of the proposed right of way, outlots and easements, grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to specific review and approval by the City Engineer, per the requirements of the Engineer's letter dated October 21, 2020. Staff would not that with recent plat submissions, the city has required as a condition of approval the burying of overhead powerlines where possible. For Edmonson Ridge, there are powerlines located along Edmonson Avenue. At the time of this report, staff, the developer, and the utility were discussing the feasibility for undergrounding these lines. Therefore, a condition has been included relating to powerline corridors to allow for continued evaluation. Development Agreement As a condition of final plat approval, the applicants must enter into a development agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by it. This issue must be subject to further comment by the City Attorney Final Plat1PUD If the current requests are approved, the applicant will be required to submit a Final Plat consistent with the conditions approved by the City. A Final Stage PUD will E City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 also be required to be submitted. City Council will review and act on the Final Plat and PUD as part of its regular process. Planned Unit Development As noted, the applicant is seeking flexibility from the typical single-family zoning requirements under what would otherwise be established by the T -N District. Flexibility being requested includes lot areas (two lots at 6,880 square feet compared to the minimum of 7,500 square feet required in the T -N district), and potentially some flexibility from the 2,000 square foot finishable requirement of the district. The applicant has also requested flexibility in the maximum driveway width of the T -N District, which limits widths to 18', as well as some reduction in overall landscaping requirements — although this is subject to a final individual lot planting plan. The flexibility being requested results in a lot density that is still in the low range at 2.7 units per acre. This density meets the T -N District requirement of 4.4 units per acre, and the R-1 District at 3.1 units per acre minimum. The density is greater than the 2.0 units per acre in the neighboring R-1 Featherstone area. For PUD projects, the City is required to find that the flexibility granted to a development project results in design and other improvements or amenities that result in better achieving the City's land use objectives. In this case, it is noted above that the Comprehensive Plan encourages a variety of housing styles and types, which this project clearly provides. In this case, the applicant is suggesting that the enhanced exterior elevation finishes offset the limited flexibility proposed from base standards relating to driveway width, lot area and landscaping. Other potential improvements to enhance the PUD could relate to additional landscape treatments, particularly along the outward edges of the project adjacent to the collector streets. In many similar locations, residents seek to add privacy to their exposed rear yards — a landscape buffer, even including a common fencing plan, would enhance this area of the project. Additional individual lot plantings have also been common in other small lot single- family areas. Similar intensified landscaping would be encouraged at the boundaries of the infiltration ponds — these ponds are located in easements, and often result in confusion by the property owners as to their rights to use or improve those areas. A landscaped buffer at the edge of these ponds, along with the conservation easement signing, could help delineate those boundaries. The applicant is also proposing that a restrictive covenant permitting only black -coated chain link fencing in the project — a consistent fence treatment that should avoid mismatched fencing facing the collector roadways. The applicant has provided a revised landscaping plan which illustrates the addition of a tree per lot in the rear yard. Staff would recommend additional buffer plantings along the stormwater ponds to supplement the tree planting. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item on November 2nd, 2020, holding public hearings on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning to PUD, Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat. 10 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 The Commission had significant discussion regarding the proposed project. During their discussion, the Commission inquired as to the proposed circulation for the development, which relies on street connections through the Featherstone development. Staff noted the existing stub streets designed for this purpose, and the likelihood that the access spacing for 85th and Edmonson as collector routes would prevent additional access to either. The streets proposed are public. The Commission sought additional clarification on garage size, driveway location, and driveway length and width. It was noted by staff that with the conditions in Exhibit Z, the applicant has the ability to address concerns related to both lot and off- street parking. The Commission questioned the applicable standards for the proposed residential development. There was a question as to whether R-1 or T -N standards should apply. In specific, the Commission inquired as to the unit sizes and garage sizes. During the public hearing, applicant Shawn Weinand of LSW Investments, LLC was able to provide additional detail on the proposed unit sizes, stating that while he would like flexibility for unit sizes at 1250 square feet, the majority of the units will be at larger sizes, up to over 3500 square feet. He also requested the ability for a minimum garage size of 440 square feet versus 450. Planner Grittman explained that as a PUD, the city is looking to evaluate whether the specific development design proposed meets the goals of the city as a whole, more so than specific standards of zoning. A resident of the Featherstone neighborhood was also present to address the Commission regarding the requests. Mr. Neil McCarty expressed concern regarding traffic through the Featherstone neighborhood. He also inquired as to whether covenants would be enforced. Staff did note the access spacing issues and briefly discussed likely traffic impact. In addition, staff explained that covenants are private and will be managed by the homeowner's association. Mr. Weinand confirmed an association would be formed. Staff noted that the enforcement of the PUD design standards would be the responsibility of the city. A question regarding the application process was also raised, with staff explaining that a final stage PUD addressing a number of these conditions would be required, along with final plat. Staff further clarified that Exhibit Z should include a requirement that the plat and PUD are contingent on annexation and the the applicable Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning. Following the hearing and additional discussion, the Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning to PUD, Development Stage PUD, and Preliminary Plat, 2-1. Chairman Sam Murdoff voted in dissent, citing concerns regarding the base standards which should be applied to the development. The Commission's motion included the addition of the contingent approval pending annexation, as well as an added condition allowing a minimum garage size of 440 square feet. The draft Planning Commission minutes are included for reference on the full discussion. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 11 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 The Planning Commission recommends Alternative 1 for both decisions below. Decision 1. Preliminary Plat 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No.2020-81 approving the Preliminary Plat for Edmonson Ridge, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z and based on the findings noted in the resolution. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2020-81 for approval of the Preliminary Plat, based on findings stated by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution, subject to additional Information from staff, the applicant, or others as directed. Decision 2. Development Stage PUD Motion to approve the Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Edmonson Ridge, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2020-032 and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny approval of the Development Stage PUD, based on findings stated by the City Council. Motion to table action on the Resolution, subject to additional Information from staff, the applicant, or others as directed. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is supportive of the proposed arrangement, uses and preliminary plat design, contingent on the applicable consideration of a Comprehensive Plan designation for residential for this parcel. With this in mind, Staff recommends approval of the rezoning to PUD and preliminary & final plat, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z, some of which have been addressed by the applicant's revised plans, and based on the findings in the accompanying resolutions for Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2020-81, Preliminary Plat B. Resolution PC -2020-031, Preliminary Plat C. Resolution PC -2020-032, Development Stage PUD D. Subject Site Image E. Applicant Narrative F. Revised Project Plans dated 11/10/20, including: a. Cover Sheet b. Existing conditions c. Preliminary Plat d. Grading Plan e. SWPPP Plan f. Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Plan g. Storm Sewer Plan h. Details i. Landscaping Plan 12 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 G. Exterior Elevations H. Sample Interior Elevations I. Parking Elevations J. City Engineer's Letter, October 21, 2020 K. Wright County Highway Department Letter, November 12, 2020 L. Public Comment Letter M. PUD Zoning Ordinance, Draft N. Planning Commission Minutes, 11/2/2020, DRAFT O. Planning Commission Agenda Item, 11/2/20 Z. Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT Z Development Stage PUD, and Preliminary Plat for Edmonson Ridge Legal Description (lengthy): The South 933 feet of the East 933 feet of the Northwest Quarter both measured at right angles thereof Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota 1. The approval of the Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD is subject to approval of the requested Annexation, rezoning and applicable Comprehensive Plan amendment, and the annexation is processed by the Office of Administrative Hearings per the MORA. Added condition to the Planning Commission Exhibit Z. 2. A sidewalk is built along 86th Street NE connecting to the proposed sidewalk connection from Edmonson Way. Revised plans illustrate the addition of the 86th Street NE sidewalk. 3. The private trail in the middle of Block 3 will be removed. Revised plans illustrate the removal of the trail. 4. Applicant will provide drawings identifying driveway widths and designs that correspond to house styles and elevations. Revised plans have been provided. The driveway and home plan design will be verified at final stage PUD. 5. Applicant shall provide unit floor plans to verify final sizes of attached garages and living space as part of the Final Stage PUD review. 6. The connecting trails to the external collector roads will be platted to 30' in width. The applicant may choose to plat just one such outlot in the southeast corner of the plat to provide convenient pedestrian access to the regional pathway system. The revised plans illustrate the required trail outlot at 30' in width, relocated to access both the 85th and Edmonson pathways, and the removal of one outlot. 7. The infiltration basins will be deeded to the City as a drainage and utility easement with conservation easement signs installed. 13 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 8. The infiltration basins shall have access for maintenance consistent with the recommendations of the City Engineer. 9. The development is subject to the requirements of the City Engineer, per the letter dated October 21, 2020. 10. Landscape treatments are added to delineate the private and public boundaries along the infiltration basin areas. 11. Landscape treatments are added at the perimeter of the platted area adjacent to the rear yards and collector roadways to create a buffer and increase rear yard privacy for residents. A revised landscaping plan has been provided. Additional shrub buffer landscaping is recommended. 12. The applicant enters into a development agreement as a condition of Final Plat and Final PUD approval. 13. The minimum size of attached garages shall be 440 square feet. Condition added by the Planning Commission. 14. The applicant and city continue to evaluate the feasibility and timing of burying powerlines adjacent to the development. 15. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. 14 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2020-81 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR EDMONSON RIDGE, A 54 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to develop property within the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area, subject to annexation, Comprehensive Plan amendment, and rezoning; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat said property into a series of single family lots, outlots for pedestrian trail purposes, public streets and trails; and WHEREAS, the site is guided as "Urban Reserve", pending approval of the proposed amendment to "Places to Live" in the City's Comprehensive PlaVd WHEREAS, the proposed Plat is cot with the long-term use and development of the property for residential uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Plat is consistent with the intent and purposes of the City's residential land use objectives, utNzing Planned Unit Development zoning, subject to conditions recommended by the Planning Commission a V ed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission *ha public hearing on November 2nd, 2020 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all of the comments and the staff rep re incorporated by refe ence the resolution; and HEREAS9 t anning Commissio the City of Monticello makes the following Findin Fact in relat the r endation of approval: 1. e Plat prov an app priate means of furthering the intent of the omprehensiv an for the site by continuing the development plans for residential use 2. The proposed i rovements on the site under the Preliminary Plat are consistent with the needs of the development in this location as a low density residential area. 3. The improvements will facilitate the logical extension of municipal public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and streets which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4.. The Plat is consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the City's zoning regulations. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2020-81 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the City Council approves the Preliminary Plat of Edmonson Ridge, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. The approval of the Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD is subject to approval of the requested Annexation, rezoning and applicable Comprehensive Plan amendment, and the annexation is processed by the Office of Administrative Hearings per the MOAA. 2. A sidewalk is built along 86th Street NE connecting toe proposed sidewalk connection from Edmonson Way. 3. The private trail in the middle of Block 3 will be removed. 4. Applicant will provide drawings identifying driveway widths and designs that correspond to house styles and elevations. 5. Applicant shall provide unit floor plans to verify final sizes of attached garages and living space as part of the Final Stage PUD review 6. The connecting trails to thftxpnlat ternal collecto oad ill be platted to 31' in width. The applicant may choose just one such outlot in the southeast corner of the plat to provide convenient pedestrian access to the re ' nal pathway system. 7. The infiltration basins will be deeded to the JILas a e and utility easement with conservation easement signs installed. 8. The infiltration basins shall have access for maintenl&� consistent with the recommendations of the City Engineer. 9. 10 11 12 The development is subject to the requirements of the City Engineer, per the letter dated October 21, 2020. Landscape treatmN'sare,,ILed to deli to the private and public boundaries along the ' filtration ba.lqq Lan e treatmdde a the perimeter of the platted area adjacent to the IL rear ya d coadways to create a buffer and increase rear yard privacy for Final PUD approval. into a development agreement as a condition of Final Plat and 13. The minimum garage size for all units shall be set at 440 square feet. 14. The applicant and city continue to evaluate the feasibility and timing of burying powerlines adjacent to the development. 15. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. K CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2020-81 ADOPTED this 23rd day of November, 2020, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Brian Stumpf, Mayor 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-031 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR EDMONSON RIDGE, A 54 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to develop property within the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area, subject to annexation, Comprehensive Plan amendment, and rezoning; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat said property into a series of single family lots, outlots for pedestrian trail purposes, public streets and trails; and WHEREAS, the site is guided as "Urban Reserve", pending approval of the proposed amendment to "Places to Live" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed Plat is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for residential uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Plat is consistent with the intent and purposes of the City's residential land use objectives, utilizing Planned Unit Development zoning, subject to conditions recommended by the Planning Commission and required by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 2nd, 2020 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The Plat provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by continuing the development plans for residential use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Preliminary Plat are consistent with the needs of the development in this location as a low density residential area. 3. The improvements will facilitate the logical extension of municipal public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and streets which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4.. The Plat is consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the City's zoning regulations. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-031 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Preliminary Plat for Edmonson Ridge, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. The approval of the Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD is subject to approval of the requested Annexation, rezoning and applicable Comprehensive Plan amendment, and the annexation is processed by the Office of Administrative Hearings per the MOAA. 2. A sidewalk is built along 86th Street NE connecting to the proposed sidewalk connection from Edmonson Way. 3. The private trail in the middle of Block 3 will be removed. 4. Applicant will provide drawings identifying driveway widths and designs that correspond to house styles and elevations. 5. Applicant shall provide unit floor plans to verify final sizes of attached garages and living space as part of the Final Stage PUD review. 6. The connecting trails to the external collector roads will be platted to 30' in width. The applicant may choose to plat just one such outlot in the southeast corner of the plat to provide convenient pedestrian access to the regional pathway system. 7. The infiltration basins will be deeded to the City as a drainage and utility easement with conservation easement signs installed. 8. The infiltration basins shall have access for maintenance consistent with the recommendations of the City Engineer. 9. The development is subject to the requirements of the City Engineer, per the letter dated October 21, 2020. 10. Landscape treatments are added to delineate the private and public boundaries along the infiltration basin areas. 11. Landscape treatments are added at the perimeter of the platted area adjacent to the rear yards and collector roadways to create a buffer and increase rear yard privacy for residents. 12. The applicant enters into a development agreement as a condition of Final Plat and Final PUD approval. 13. The minimum garage size for all units shall be set at 440 square feet. 14. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2nd day of November, 2020, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. K CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-031 MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION LIZ ATTEST: Sam Murdoff, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-032 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR EDMONSON RIDGE, A 54 -LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to rezone its property from Agriculture upon annexation to the City, to PUD, Edmonson Ridge Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, the applicants are seeking a Development Stage PUD approval as reflected by the plans and plat drawing submitted for rezoning, PUD, and Preliminary Plat; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for single family uses under the approved Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the site is proposed to be guided for residential uses under the label "Places to Live" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with the long- term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 4th, 2018 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for single family residential uses is consistent with the City's interest in promoting the long-term planned land uses in the area. 3. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location. 4. The improvements will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project, including incorporation of original building standards and other zoning requirements, are consistent with the CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-032 intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Development Stage PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. The approval of the Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD is subject to approval of the requested Annexation, rezoning and applicable Comprehensive Plan amendment, and the annexation is processed by the Office of Administrative Hearings per the MOAA. 2. A sidewalk is built along 86th Street NE connecting to the proposed sidewalk connection from Edmonson Way. 3. The private trail in the middle of Block 3 will be removed. 4. Applicant will provide drawings identifying driveway widths and designs that correspond to house styles and elevations. 5. Applicant shall provide unit floor plans to verify final sizes of attached garages and living space as part of the Final Stage PUD review. 6. The connecting trails to the external collector roads will be platted to 30' in width. The applicant may choose to plat just one such outlot in the southeast corner of the plat to provide convenient pedestrian access to the regional pathway system. 7. The infiltration basins will be deeded to the City as a drainage and utility easement with conservation easement signs installed. 8. The infiltration basins shall have access for maintenance consistent with the recommendations of the City Engineer. 9. The development is subject to the requirements of the City Engineer, per the letter dated October 21, 2020. 10. Landscape treatments are added to delineate the private and public boundaries along the infiltration basin areas. 11. Landscape treatments are added at the perimeter of the platted area adjacent to the rear yards and collector roadways to create a buffer and increase rear yard privacy for residents. 12. The applicant enters into a development agreement as a condition of Final Plat and Final PUD approval. 13. The minimum garage size for all units shall be set at 440 square feet. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-032 14. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2nd day of November, 2020, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION ON ATTEST: Sam Murdoff, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 Shawn Weinand/LSW Investments, LLC I Request for Comp Plan Arndt, Rezoning, Dev Stage PUD, Plat 8617 Edmonson Avenue NE I PID: 213-100-232400 Created by: City of Monticello EDMONSON RIDGE The property currently located at 8617 Edmonson Avenue NE, Monticello, formerly owned by the City of Monticello and used by the publics works department for storage. This was purchased in February of 2020 by LSW Investments with the intent of developing it into a residential development similar to Autumn Ridge Villas. The property is located in the township currently guided urban reserve and requires annexation. It does fall within the orderly annexation which has been applied for. It would be our intent to build a project with a similar look and feel as the Autumn Ridge Villas, which has turned out to be one of the nicer looking projects in Monticello. This project was designed to cater to an older buyer with an association and a smaller tighter area, with one style of home. In Edmonson Ridge we would like to cater to a mixed group of buyers, using the single family home concept. Still not just a conventional neighborhood but a little more density in a controlled style. We are proposing 3.05 units per net acre, 20 gross acres 17.72 net acres. Standard streets with 39' driveways and a mix of lots that will allow full basement walkouts, 4 level lookouts, 2 stories, and ramblers with full basements or crawlspaces. Two thirds of these homes will have three car garages a few possible four car and the balance with two car. The plans are flexible to try to cater to the step-up buyer who wants something nicer with more footage or not so much, trying to create a sense of neighborhood. If you notice the exterior designs are very similar, no matter the style you pick yet unique. These houses will range from 1250 sq. ft. finished to 3500 plus feet finished depending on the market and the buyers needs. This will not be a fast sell based on Monticello sales and this being an upscale product its probably a 5 -year build. Hopefully not but we have designed this to have flexibility as the market changes and as our buyers needs change as well as costs and interest rates. For the City this is probably in the range of a 20 -million -dollar project. The homes will have similar materials and colors, maybe a selection of 4 different base, accent and trim colors all from the newest color pallets. We will have 1 roof color but mixing the materials as we have done in Autumn Ridge to create unity. We will have possibly 4 different stone selections. We are going to wait on picking colors until next spring/summer as colors are changing and we want to pick from what is the newest or best selections. Each home will have a landscape package to include rock and edging around the foundations, front yard plantings similar to Autumn Ridge and a sprinkler system. Fences will only be allowed after a home is built on both sides but must be black chain link or invisible dog fence and only free-standing basketball hoops permanently mounted in the upper 1/3 of the driveway will be allowed. There will be a boulder wall monument area in the corner of Edmonson and 85th Avenue for the project identification with plantings. The mailboxes will be multi -unit boxes placed throughout the project. The spacing between buildings will be a minimum of 14' that's a 7' side yard setback instead of a 5', nice size front yards with a good selection of large backyards. The trail system will tie to the existing trail on Edmonson and go down to the first intersection, down 85th to the next intersection. There will be two access points into Edmonson Ridge project with sidewalk and trail access through Edmonson Ridge project tying to Featherstone in two locations. The traffic from Edmonson Ridge project should have very little effect on the Featherstone neighborhoods, 85th Avenue or Edmonson. It would be my understanding that Edmonson Ridge project because its guided urban reserve does need a comprehensive plan amendment. We feel we need some flexibility with how we are doing the project and trying to create a little more of a step up house and separate neighborhood identity. We need a rezoning to a PUD at the same time. We are also asking for a development stage PUD and preliminary plat. We hope to start selling out of this project by fall of 2021. Thank you for your consideration. EDMONSON RIDGE MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA R-1 ZONING CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO'S DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX NO. COVER SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE PLAN GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN OVERALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN OVERALL STORM SEWER PLAN DETAILS OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9 10 11-12 13 PROPERTY OWNER LSW INVESTMENTS 4065 CHELSEA RD W MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PH: 763-271-8600 CONTACT: SHAWN WEINAND EM: shawnweinand@gmail.com DEVELOPER SW LAND OR ASSIGNEE 4065 CHELSEA RD W MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PH: 763-271-8600 CONTACT: SHAWN WEINAND EM: shawnweinand@gmail.com CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. N 733 MARQUETTE AVE SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 PH: 612-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER DAVE NASH LICENSE NO. 21836 EM: dnash@alliant-inc.com SURVEYOR PETER GOERS LICENSE NO. 44110 EM: pgoers@alliant-inc.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MARK KRONBECK LICENSE NO. 26222 EM: mkronbeck@alliant-inc.com Ev�Ew ow( NO pNoy FOR 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W C� Q m 0 oc W z County Rd 39 NE 14 O fr Monticello Z J O w F - o z LU 12 PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 '"w r `J w -tit,* Ir�iJ ia: C5 - PROJECT LOCATION Y� m 1G+E MhStINE m m 04 � � 80th S[ HE r �r � VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX NO. COVER SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE PLAN GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN OVERALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN OVERALL STORM SEWER PLAN DETAILS OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9 10 11-12 13 PROPERTY OWNER LSW INVESTMENTS 4065 CHELSEA RD W MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PH: 763-271-8600 CONTACT: SHAWN WEINAND EM: shawnweinand@gmail.com DEVELOPER SW LAND OR ASSIGNEE 4065 CHELSEA RD W MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PH: 763-271-8600 CONTACT: SHAWN WEINAND EM: shawnweinand@gmail.com CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. N 733 MARQUETTE AVE SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 PH: 612-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER DAVE NASH LICENSE NO. 21836 EM: dnash@alliant-inc.com SURVEYOR PETER GOERS LICENSE NO. 44110 EM: pgoers@alliant-inc.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MARK KRONBECK LICENSE NO. 26222 EM: mkronbeck@alliant-inc.com Ev�Ew ow( NO pNoy FOR 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W C� Q o 0 oc W z Z Z O U) o Z J O w F - o z LU 12 J Q F- F - UD H m ♦♦D V/ F— J a Q Z J W cc a 0 Z Q W 0 a H cn H Z W a O J W W 0 0 a F- LU W W W O 0 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 1 SHEET 1 OF 13 - RIM 963.14 RIM 963.74 87TH STREET NORTHEAST --------; r-------- / al BITUMINOUS \ a a G< 961.46 9625 �0 - / / � 961.94 S � ` 964.55 _ M . 963.68 I `RIM 963.42 _RIM 962.81___/ D �t co •• NV 947.83(E) r N BRIM 962.74 / NV 947.80(S) Lo n INV 1 / I 4414 87TH ST. NE 1 4432 87TH ST. (W) o w�� . 963.904462 87TH ST. NE 4482 87TH ST. NE __55 -� / I 4348 87TH ST. NE 4366 87TH ST. NE 14382 87TH ST. NE 1 4396 87TH ST. NE 4300 87TH ST. NE / 4318 87TH ST. NE 14332 87TH ST. NE lo 1 OWNER: DANIEL (OWNER: MATTHEW 1 16 Z m OWNER: SHELLEY OWNER: STEVEN N �, OWNER: BRADY OWNER: TROY AND OWNER: JENITA JO OWNER: ANTHONY W DENNY AND EMDONDI AND KAILA WILLIAMS 1) o o OWNER: DERRICK AND / OWNER: RICHARD OWNER: PROTUS SABATINO NORDIN AND (AND JESSICA NORTON( JACKIE MATTSON 1 TEACHOUT TRUST AND HEATHER �_ PLETCHER 967.62 � 970.48 m o BRIGGS AND CALLIE I MATAGARO JENNIFER PALMER I JOHNSON 60 Q 1 X ° X 967.77 PAULA ZYCHOWSKI / KOBILKA I - - n -/- /1 - r i I-/- i A /� i - i i A r Z 964.40 n f f L A O I/ SCC_ ZI / // // //�/ ��� 1 I �I V L _ / L - / / V L / LU M / L / L / V o 1 CHAIN LINK A Y oO X967.47 X969.88 X969.4rnFENCE---- RIM 956.66 X960.66 964.59 N Q �966 27 Q 1 95 79 RIM 964.30 _ooNV 953.02 X959.54 62.59X-----3 W a X967.08RIM 954.00 956.58 956.76 PLANTER BEDS-- X960.22 NV 948.74 S) 2949.55 1 958.40 959.46 NV 948.72( ) \ 966.75 HIDD 967.46 95 _ X PLANTER BED-- 961.541 ` 9 8. 3 g ol953.36 6 X 90 X956.33 \y956.96 CHAIN-LINK FENCE 959.30 859.08X1 �® 95 X958'7a HED S 964. 0 X /2 INCH8 956.04 76. 957.5 0.2 FT N. OF-- 1 oo oi ii X Q ( 6952.94 959.93 1 1/2 INCH X962.61 p 96 964.13 OPEN BEN 66.52 0 / 9 .66x 954.18 X X956.32 0 957 2 PROP. LINE FIRE PIT N 961.35 962.02 89 0639E 933.0 964.25 '/S X965. 0 3W 966.31 66.81 1 15" RCP---�1444 INCH 954 957.45 957.67 959.21 g 948.29 961.43 X962.71 5 / 957.98 958.16 ,SHED S 4.1 X 962 X96.4 963.97 X965.21 0 J - - - - - X X 1 2 INCH 95 .62 X957. 957.96 958.84 960.43 X I X961.76 .99 X965.75 = 6 1 - - - - - - L - - - - - 949.36 9 5.2 CAP #42299 X958.48 \ NORTH -/ /2 INCH .96 0 1�1X958.29 OF PROPERTY 2 INCH 961.71 \_NORTH LINE CAP #20595 m CO o. m. 9 9. 956.56 --1/2 INCH IRON WITH /2 INCH IRO - LINE CAP #20595 0.3W, OAS ol ° � I D 8666 EBERSOLE AVE. 94 . 0 UNREADABLE CAP UNREAD CAP X960.84 OF THEE SOUTH o � 33 X967.10 2 1 C X961.61 X962.48 963.94 - OWNER: NOVAK-FLECK INC P 4 29 X957.98 1 X961.57 X961.50 X961.40 X964.95 X965.68 X966.08 I X958.58 X959.00 X960.64 X961.06 I X965.9 47 52 956.51 X966. 2 X960.56 o X968.44 GRASS -X968.47 _ 59.96 GRASS 961.08 I � I 1 _ X961.87 X961.35 X n X961.45 - 966.04 / _-_--_---_ m X96248 964.06 io 8648 EBERSOLE AVE. i ------------ ----- Xg61.s6 X9-- X965.23 . X9s7.os I/2 IN X956.44 1X957.5 X958.36 --------------------X-------------- 933 I CAP 42 99------� - X965.86 X966.16 O - - OWNER: BRYCE AND ----�_________________ ----3 # X960.80 961.38 I ----------- ______________ o I c9 X95 60 X960.32 960 63 1 _ X967.57 I KASANDRA PARKER > i X 47.42 954.74 s� 960.32 X X961. 0 X962.61 X X'964.36 g66 X961.73 I 96 .82 X965.44 9 0° I co rn o i �O X960.93 966.01 X966.23 X 6S J 0 1 / X95 54 X961.10 �� 966.58 X967.66 968.11 \`9� rn 956.69 rn 967.09 i CID O N X955.60 1 X961.23 O X9 .73 " \ i t LO X958.70 9.90 X960.88 �0 10" ASH BXE 12 ASHOf I � p) � X 1 962.17 X965.05 16" ELM \ o o i 961.34 " PRU >:D X961.34 X9 .84 967.50 a o 1 954.44 1 18, SPRU 965.22 1964.67 X966.65 X o c 1 / X 47 6 1/2 INCH I X960.23 X960.56 961. 5 1 N 20. 966.15 X966.79 967.0 8634 EBERSOLE AVE. CAP #42299 >�956.48 X957.45 64.31 do X955. 1 X961.24 X961.48 - - " 18 PINE 65.6 0 OWNER: WILLIAM AND/ / X958.29 X959.17 63.8 ////// 964.89 ----- 13" BXE---- 311.7- ---- -- 1- SP_- - - - 966.88 KELLY STEPHENS U X960.75 X966.20 X966.81 N i J Q X967.23 X967.29 968 of I m �� o, 967.98 i X959.7 960.24 962.18 X967.25 967.24 o rn o 00 / 53 95 53.3 X X961.58 X X o ro cD \ X948. METAL BARN z ° ' 968.01 X954.43 X1956.30 94 963. 3 IS ASH J X9 7.94 X961.08 I � o 966.04 O X958.25 X958.39 966.14 966.09 GRASS 12' SPRU Do I ~ i c W X960.65 X 966.36 X966.62 m I� 8620 EBERSOLE AVE. 1/2 1N Lu Lu Ln � 967.a4 968 I 0 ? 4 co 966.32 ^ 7.3x8.3 966.94 CAP # 22 9 N 963.11 0 C X68.12 i OWNER: JUSTIN n J X958.50 X959.29 / I SHED �� X966.72 X I rn O X962.23 X 948.21 X� X19 5.50 962.83 965. 3 962.5 965.71 ----- N 1 966.65 o 5 .27 X95 28 61.99 966.00 ---------------------------------- � AANENSON AND ADDIE n 96463 I �X JOHNSON X957.59 65.74 958.30 o � � � I X 57.94 964.00 965.11 965.38 965.89 � 311.4 X963.44 - - X965.57 X GRAVEL/ ) EM X967.12 i X960.46 / � 1 964.46 ' 966.74 � I / 965.75 X967.66 GRASS 964.6 X966.93 966.57 X958.50 X958.84 X964.45 7 965.69 1 i 7-. 8 X966.96 966.85 oG I PINE o 8608 EBERSOLE AVE. 952.05 94.11 X956.9 958.97 X96 .48 X964.71 965.29 g,4 g9�0 966.53I� 967.10 ` 8" PINE I 966.67 i 948.51X X X959.48 X 6'6 96 . I \ OWNER: BARRY X 51.01 950.83 9 X960 97 965.48 ybb 71. 967.28 EM 12" SPRU z GRASS 965.35 966.25 ` \ .00 o J AND JILL WOLF 1/2 INCH 965.34 �96B.60 \ 6 9 7.27 X967.26 X967.02 o> cn i CAP #42299 X� 59.88 6.01 \ �R� ` --DIRT PILE I Ir, 0 / 964.90 65.88 / g c O 10 SPRU o, I� _ 965.13 6>\ o f ^ o rn 953.66 X950.9 X95 09 X 55.57 X964.42 L 967.07 iS \ X 67.66 0 12" SPRU 0 Xrn 9 �L� \952.91 X 9.70 X958.61 X960.73 X966.19 X966.86 ` ^ X967.19 POST J�Ln X966. X965.48 12" SP / / J X 2.03 X962.81 X965 X967.00 X69 0 -X---'L66.81 965.98 NV 964.03 / W X -X 56.7 \X966.40 X966.24 3 / M X962.18- � X966.90 96659 - - - _ - 965.40 - ol X951..22 / W X 65.81 \ 69 6.59 - - - - 965.75 GRAVEL 9 6. 0 o, T 0 X950.26 X954.5 X9 7.34 X966.69 / I - - i m W 7 960.25 966.01 \ 8592 EBERSOLE 954.4 950.04 X965.30 X966.25 L X966.30 20" ASH / o' M AVE. X -TOE OF SLOPE 963.98 i 966.45 X966.58 Xg66.33� 5" RCP - i T Q �y _ 967.05 966.84 i \ o X962.29 i \ X965.72 956.42 o - X967.10 \ 966.81 967.05 /ROCK PILE 966.74 o X965.32 NV 963 69J//� m N OWNER: 50.42 951.62 x` G of n X 966.75 cn I � Z X966.79 a o 966.83 2 `o NOVAK-FLECK INC Z 949 as r� a 967.00 �� \ GRASS 1 RIM 957.15 54. 2 953.80 X956.29 X958. 8 X966.86 10 966.83 Oj LU o N NV 947.69(E) , X956.78 X 5 950.82 1 965.98 <' \ X9 3.59 / I X966.03 966.81 967.14 966.63 �qq INV 947.58(W) \ - 1/2 INCH IRON W tH X960.9 -_q / X966.41 66.08 X965.33 Xo X964.28 X o n ~ X 964.23 I w In o O Q 958.48 g 7.98\ 957.54 UNREADABLE CAP 6 X967.22 966.02 X X966.31 966.31 864.81 > D o X\ 966.25 a o (p O W N 956.97• 951.24 X9511 / X966.61 966. \-- 964.00 958 957.71 \ 957.23 6.56 00 Q WALL 964.43X BLOCK X965.33 X964.85 o1. 964.43X I o U rLl+CO 8" DIP 956. X95 .22 O \ �\ RIM 957.30 X952.7 C� X966.93 Q G) --------� BITUMINOUS \ X955. X964.9 965.95 X965.48 S Q �4- 4 Q SS < 1 X9 .27 962.66 X965.60 X964.49 o C� Q X965.93 X964.30 8 PVC 9 5 957.80 957.29 950.62 1 0 -- X965.63 I Lu O 86TH STREETO NORTHEAST 9 .31� 5510 9s �� / X966.34 X965.86 I o 958.18 957.72 957.32 95 .38 - PLUG X 95 .51 GRASS 9s X965.28 X964.55 X964.11 \64.83 I rn c-/ Sz X � 95 .41 X9 50 X95 .29 \ X963.1 X965.50 RIM 9s7.60 _ 956 9 94 .82 X953. 965.97 X965.73 o NV 946.28(E) do ><9 28\ 959.90 X965.34 X964.94 X964.47 o1. o O 2 NV 946.24(S) X957.7 X965.38 X965.09 X964.90 z INV 946.14(N) J X957. 2 95 4 949.73 950.18 11 I GRASS X965.32 0 � X X964.65 X949.54 X 63.94 X964.36 X964.42 ol 965.38 c i > y 50.92 964.58 X r7 �p 8562 EBERSOLE - EDGE SOD 1T / / m 957.7 0) 0) 1 --2.00 F T EAST X950.66 \ X9 .43 °o o w AVE. X WATER SP OT OF PRO ERTY X 1.69 / X96 37 X965.05 °o o r 9 5.39 958.06 X965.17 X965.10 X964.92 X964.44 �� O cO 9 2.41 LINE LO n X X964.89 X965.12 X964.23 0 o ° lo 1965.13 OWNER: SH LENDRA RETAINING 0)j 1 \ i i 963.99 X964.92 963 4 � X o 964.37 I--- RAMGOBIN 955.63 WALL 9N.46 X950.33 X \ \� X962.42 X965.27 X965.04 964 LO 950.11 \ X963. 4 SHED 6) X964.87 Q 957.53 12' 952.8 j X950.38 X950.94 X95227 959.92 D W - - - - - - -/- - 954.12 X964.69 X965.19 X965.56 X9 .22 X963.44 o o I -1/2 INCH IRON WITH 1 X956.5 X963.15 X965.36 X965.12 UNREADABLE CAP I X965.04 963.19 - 9 8.11 953.04 X963.90 951.97 X 1 X961. 8 X965.97 X965.68 O 8544 EBERSOLE L 9s1.1a X964.84 AVE. X950.66 X 1.69 X958.69 X962.68 X963.01 0 o 950.80 X 95 .35 964.06 X965.63 963.98 'n � 1 X9 5.47X965.04 X966.00 1 X962.60 W OWNER: 1 J 958.2 953.85 1 X965.06 X965.38 m D NOVAK-FLECK INC X965.55 962.52 I X 964.01 Z T - j X953.10 9 .06 X960.48 X965.92 W L 95 .85 I I X951.3 X964.40 962.22X I o > - - - - - T - _X -1/2 INCH IRON WITH X951.24 X950.99 X952.86 X9 7.39 X965.81 964.05 X962.47 Q 954.6 UNREADABLE CAP X954.46 X 1.73 X963.26 X964.96 X965.90 GRASS �I o I- N W GRASS X964.80 X965.64 X965.36 962 46 to I� �° J __ 9 8.30 952.31 X95 33 X965.53 0 6 m o O C X953.42 X GRASS X 63.92 96206X o 0 X 963.91 954.5 X95 .70 � X951.40 X963.45 W X951.28 X952.70 X956.30 X960.66 9610 X966.0 X965.09 I GRAVEL 8522 EBERSOLE X9s5.3o X965.86 W � � i 954.09 X962.53 --- AVE. I X964.68 I =SHOULDER m 954.37 952.76 958.03 966.01 X964.89 X965.08 0 ". o 962.48 W OWNER: 9 8.2 X 54.16 X X 1 X 963.73 NOVAK-FLECK INC L X951.88 X952.39 X963.41 X 962.37 133 965.25 X9 .42 i PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The South 933 feet of the East 933 feet of the Northwest Quarter both measured at right angles thereof of Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota CERTIFICATION To LSW Investments, LLC; Registered Abstracters, Inc; and First American Title Insurance Company: This is to Certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13 and 16 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on October 25, 2019. Date of Plat or Map: December 6, 2019 \ �rV Dennis B. Olmstead, Professional Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 18425 Email: dolmstead@alliant-inc.com 1. This survey and the property description shown here on are based upon information found in the commitment for title insurance prepared by Registered Abstracters, Inc., as agent for First American Title Insurance Company, file no. T19-10010, dated September 30, 2019. 2. The locations of underground utilities are depicted based on Gopher State One Call, available city maps, records and field locations and may not be exact. Verify critical utilities prior to construction or design. 3. The basis of bearings is Wright County Coordinate System(NAD83 96 adjustment) and the East line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, which is assumed to have a bearing of South 01°36'50" West. 4. All distances are in feet. 5. The area of the above described property is 871,320 square feet or 20.00 acres. 6. There are 0 regular striped parking stalls and 0 handicapped parking stalls. 7. The property lies within Zone X (unshaded - areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Community Panel No. 2705340015B, effective August 4, 1988. 8. There was no observed evidence of recent earth moving work, building construction, or building additions at the time of our field work. 9. Names of adjoining owners are depicted based on Wright County GIS tax information. 10. Originating benchmark is MnDot 8605 H. Elevation = 966.12 (NAVD 88) 11. There are no survey related exceptions set forth in Schedule B, Section Two of the Title Commitment. O SET CAP IRON MONUMENT 18425 • FOUND IRON MONUMENT HYDRANT g WATER VALVE ❑T TELEPHONE BOX SO SANITARY MANHOLE G SIGN OO ❑ CATCH BASIN EM ELECTRIC METER LIGHT O STORM MANHOLE �I POWER POLE I GUY WIRE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE WELL © COMMUNICATION VAULT D SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FO UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC OU OVERHEAD UTILITIES X FENCE G UNDERGROUND GAS CONCRETE LIST OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS VICINITY MAP NO SCALE 1. Fire hydrant located east of the west property line 2. Water spigot located east of the west property line 3. Power poles, guy wires, and overhead utility lines north and west of 85th St. NE and Edmonson Ave. NE rights of way. 4. Edge of sod located east of the west property line. X966. 6 -_ X 5.67 X965.63 - 51.95 X953.3 X954.53 X965.18 N - I X959 11 953.98 X X 61.75 X965.87 X964.70 � 962.43 _ 0 0 0 o o 957.98X X9 .52 /2 INCH IRON WITH 853.20 1 X956.87 X964.30 963.X5(0 1 m X964.39 I- X953.59 CAP 965.11 X953.59 -_�I X952.95 961. X962.99 964.95 964.80 © / J S 962.55 00 X952.22 X OU 64.14 96406 96�U28 X96 OUO X9 OU44 OU X OU OU OU T c0 96 \ 953.83 2.68 RIPRAP ON 954 04 954.78 955.23 956.42 957.83 961.78 X -PROP. LINE / 952.36 u952.50 953.17 O#c 0 - 9s2.42X oU � ou. outou you-ou ou-���okC RIP P---- i / 961.0 9 964.27 965.36 X964. - - - - - X964.10 - 964.260 965.89 S& 964.72 X95221 952.35 X952.76 954.00 X954.41 X954. 55.69 .33 9.64 X X962.41 X - _ - 965.70 965.11 ___ --- --- - - 966.3 BITU (NOUS _ _ _ 955.9 - - - - 967.16 GRAVEL 1 967.04 965.79 X965.60 ---- --- - -- NORTHEAST 955.14 955.8 956.29 GRAVEL 958.09 960 960.42 ST EET ��� X964.88 ��� BITUMINOUS X967.48 'SHOULDER X967.47 0 X - .15 BITUMINOUS 955. 956 85TH , SHOULDER BITUMINOUS 960.721 8 - - 5 X955.44 - 960.41 5.28 _ - - - 966_93 - - - - _ - - - - - - - -- - - - 86 � 965.48 964.83 955.53 956.28 9S$ 958.06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5; 50 X 629�26'�X961.48 N 95504 ---- - ------ ----- �� X964.17 X964.27 X9 ------ --� --- 956. Z 963.09 N rn 954.86 952.10 X952.65 X953.05 X952.84 9 3.93 X954.69 55.91 , 956. 63. 2\ X95 ° 87 i X958.7 960.53 g 1 44 1 \ u964.56 X X965.56 X965.01 953.10 X952.98 981,74 i T1�964.06' X965.29 964.78 X965.56 Xg 65.78 T 0 19 1.8 950.54 951.98 u952.84 X X953.00 X953.31 X95 .71 X954.48 X9 5.66 X956.82 963.48 962.31 X cv X948.87 `-SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 AFIELD _ `� p 30 60 120 OF SEC. 23, T. 12/, R. 25 ENTRANCE 9 4.95 961.60 1 X I 961.25 SCALE IN FEET i 965.10 _„_ „ c E Q N Ln O N O N O O z > co O E O O v X N N O O N X N O E C= 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com LU � Q p o oc W z z Z O U) o z J O w F - z W 12 J Q H H m D U) F- a. a oC Q z J W cc a 0 z Q LU 0 a F- cn F - z LU 2 a O J W W O O a F - Q J a o� Q z J W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 3 SHEET 3 OF 13 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com LU 0 a o oC w Z z Z O U) o Z J O W o Z LU 12 J Q F— F— Cl) H m H a J a oc Q z J W cc a 0 z Q LU 0 Q H H z LU a O J W W 0 0 a Z Q J a LU H Cn I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 2 SHEET 4 OF 13 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com LU C� Q o 0 oc w Z z Z O cn C Z J O w o Z LU 12 J Q H H m Cn Z � a J J a a � J O Q 1= Z ~ Z 2 O J V LU Z CC O a - o C/) z 0 Q 1= LU LU o z � a C/) w Z a LU z 2 a a O p J LU > w Z- 0 p o a a c� I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 5 SHEET 5 OF 13 EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: 1. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) REFER TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DEFINED IN THE MPCA's "PROTECTING WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AREAS" AND THE MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING HANDBOOK. 2. ALL BMP'S SELECTED SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE TIME OF YEAR, SITE CONDITIONS, AND ESTIMATED DURATION OF USE. 3. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 4. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 5. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NO DISTURBANCES BEYOND THIS BOUNDARY. 6. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES, GRASS AND OTHER VEGETATIVE COVER TO HELP FILTER RUNOFF. 7. ESTABLISH A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOILS. PLANT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH DENSE GRASS FILTER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO MINIMIZE WEED GROWTH. 8. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP's) SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES AND THEY SHALL BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 9. SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED AT DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER OF DISTURBED AREAS AND STOCKPILES. PROTECT ADJACENT WATERBODIES, PONDS, WETLANDS, AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES FROM SEDIMENTATION AND STORMWATER RUNOFF. 10. THE BMP'S SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT MORE BMP'S WILL BE NECESSARY TO ENSURE ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON THE SITE. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND/OR CLIMATIC EVENTS AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BMP'S OVER AND ABOVE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES. 11. THE BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. SILT FENCES SHALL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED AT SEDIMENT BUILDUP OF 1/3 OF THE FENCE HEIGHT. 12. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OCCUR IN INCREMENTS OF WORKABLE SIZE SUCH THAT ADEQUATE BMP CONTROL CAN BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. THE SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA SHALL BE EXPOSED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE TIME. 13. OPERATE TRACK EQUIPMENT (DOZER) UP AND DOWN EXPOSED SOIL SLOPES ON FINAL PASS, LEAVING TRACK GROOVES PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. DO NOT BACK -BLADE. LEAVE A SURFACE ROUGH TO MINIMIZE EROSION. 14. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED FROM EROSION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF GRADING IN THAT AREA. TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH SHALL COVER ALL EXPOSED SOILS IF GRADING COMPLETION IS DELAYED LONGER THAN 7 DAYS. PERMANENT SEED AND MULCH OR SOD IS REQUIRED WITHIN 3 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING. 15. GENERAL TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MN STATE SEED MIX 22-112 ® 40 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL. PERMANENT SEED SHALL BE MN STATE SEED MIX 25-151 ® 120 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL (CHECK PLANTING DATES PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL). MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 (CLEAN OAT STRAW) ® 2 TONS PER ACRE AND DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR APPROVED EQUAL. FERTILIZER SHALL BE 10-10-10 NPK PER ACRE (UNLESS P RESTRICTIONS APPLY) AND INCORPORATED INTO THE SEED BED. 16. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. 17. ALL CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER, AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED AND COMPLY WITH THE MPCA AND CITY OF MONTICELLO RULES AND REQUIREMENTS. DEWATERING: 1. IF UTILITY INSTALLATION WORK ENCOUNTERS GROUNDWATER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PLAN TO THE CITY AND PROJECT ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. THE PLAN AT MINIMUM SHALL BE A DEWATERING PLAN INCLUDING WATER ROUTING, STORAGE, AND DISCHARGE LOCATION. 2. IF ANY TEMPORARY DEWATERING IS REQUIRED ONSITE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF STORMWATER OR GROUND WATER BY USE OF PUMPS AND HOSES TO ACCEPTABLE DISCHARGE POINTS APPROVED BY THE CITY AND PROJECT ENGINEER. 3. ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT ALONG EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER THAT HAS COLLECTED AS A RESULT OF DISCHARGING DEWATERING HOSES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF AFTER EACH DISCHARGING EVENT. EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES 1. THE CONTRACTOR MUST EMPLOY SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. a. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS THAT ARE DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK -CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. b. IF THE DOWN GRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED (BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENT), THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING, AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3 IN THE GENERAL PERMIT. 2. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS AND BE LOCATED UPGRADIENT OF ANY WATERBODIES OR WETLANDS. THE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICE MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REINSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES THAT HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY THAT REQUIRES REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REINSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 4. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G., CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MNDOT ENGINEER). THE CONTRACTOR MUST DOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP. 5. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN ANY NATURAL BUFFERS, SURFACE WATERS, OR DITCHES UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. 6. WHERE VEHICLE TRAFFIC LEAVES ANY PART OF THE SITE (OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE): a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. EXAMPLES OF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) ROCK PADS, MUD MATS, SLASH MULCH, CONCRETE OR STEEL WASH RACKS, OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS. b. THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF SUCH VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET (SEE ITEM 9.2 IN THE GENERAL PERMIT). 7. THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14 OF THIS PERMIT. 8. THE CONTRACTOR MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION IN THE INFILTRATION AREAS AND, UNLESS INFEASIBLE, PRESERVE TOPSOIL. MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA OF THE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTED. 9. IF THE CONTRACTOR INTENDS TO USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE TREATMENT. CHEMICALS MAY ONLY BE APPLIED WHERE TREATED STORMWATER IS DIRECTED TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM WHICH ALLOWS FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. b. CHEMICALS MUST BE SELECTED THAT ARE APPROPRIATELY SUITED TO THE TYPES OF SOILS LIKELY TO BE EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND TO THE EXPECTED TURBIDITY, PH, AND FLOW RATE OF STORMWATER FLOWING INTO THE CHEMICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM OR AREA. c. CHEMICALS MUST BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, AND WITH DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR PROVIDER SUPPLIER OF THE APPLICABLE CHEMICALS. / 1. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION, SILT FENCE/PERIMETER CONTROL SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN TO INTERCEPT RUNOFF. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS INDICATED ON THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND ANY ADDITIONAL AREAS AS REQUIRED BASED ON MEANS, METHODS AND SEQUENCES OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATIONS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN RE -VEGETATED. CONTRACTOR MAY REMOVE NECESSARY SILT FENCING/FILTERS TO CONSTRUCT ROADWAYS, WHILE MAINTAINING ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL IN ADJACENT AREA. 4. SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED TO ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF 6" OF TOPSOIL FOR DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE -VEGETATED. 5. SOIL SURFACES IN PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREAS COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT OR DEEP RIPPING TO AN 18" DEPTH. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE SITE GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION AND PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION SO CANAFTER DISTURBANCE. AREASHAT THATHWILLENERAL NOT BEITE SUB ECTBTOMULCHED CONSTRUCTIONANDRTRAFFICESSHALLLOBE SEEDED (MN WINTER STABLIZATION: STATE SEED MIX 22-112 ® 40 LBS/AC) AND MULCHED OR SODDED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF GRADING CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS IN THE CASE WHERE THE ONSET OF WINTER DOES BEING DISTURBED. NOT ALLOW FOR COMPLETION OF MASS GRADING AND FINAL SOIL STABLIZATION IN THE FALL: 1. MASS GRADING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PLANNED AND PHASED IN A MANNER TO AVOID ANY UNNECESSARY SOIL DISTURBANCE PRIOR TO WINTER SHUT DOWN. 2. ALL FINAL GRADED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED PERMANENTLY BY GRADING CONTRACTOR WITH SEEDING, MULCHING, BLANKET, ETC. IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR LEAVING THE SITE AT WINTER SHUT DOWN. EROSION CONTROL RESPONSIBLE PARTIES 3. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT ALL TEMPORARY OR INCOMPLETE GRADING AREAS INCLUDING ALL STOCKPILES ARE STABILIZED WITH OWNER/DEVELOPER: SWPPP INSPECTOR: BEFOREALEAVING THE MNY SEEDING(SITE AT WINTER HSTATE SEEDIUT22-1DOWN? ®40/AC, MULCH (MNDOT TYPE 1) SHAWN WEINAND TBD 4. ALL SIGNIFICANT DRAINAGE SWALES (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT) SHALL BE STABILIZED LSW INVESTMENTS LLC WITH MNDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET BY GRADING CONTRACTOR PRIOR 4065 CHELSEA RD W TO LEAVING THE SITE AT WINTER SHUT DOWN. MONTICELLO, MN 55362 763-271-8600 ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: SPENCER TOLLIVER TBD ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S MARQUETTE AVE, SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 stolliver@alliant-inc.com 612-383-2228 SILT FENCE 4,775 LF INLET PROTECTION 20 EA ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EA EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 2,025 SF DITCH CHECKS (SEDIMENT LOG) 120 LF DISTURBED AREA / IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY: DISTURBED AREA 18.77 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 0.73 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 8.15 AC NET CHANGE IMPERVIOUS +7.42 AC INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE POLLUTION PREVENTION 1. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT A TRAINED PERSON (AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.b OF THE GENERAL PERMIT) WILL ROUTINELY INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. FOLLOWING AN INSPECTION THAT OCCURS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT, THE NEXT INSPECTION MUST BE CONDUCTED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE RAINFALL EVENT. 2. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN 24 HOURS IN WRITING AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY SHALL INCLUDE: a. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS b. NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS c. FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED d.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES) e.DATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH (0.5 INCHES) IN 24 HOURS. RAINFALL AMOUNTS MUST BE OBTAINED BY A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF YOUR LOCATION OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES. f. IF ANY DISCHARGE IS OBSERVED TO BE OCCURRING DURING THE INSPECTION, A RECORD OF ALL POINTS OF THE PROPERTY FROM WHICH THERE IS A DISCHARGE MUST BE MADE, AND THE DISCHARGE SHOULD BE DESCRIBED (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, FLOATING, SETTLED, OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS) AND PHOTOGRAPHED. g.ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. 3.INSPECTION FREQUENCY ADJUSTMENT a.WHERE PARTS OF THE PROJECT SITE HAVE PERMANENT COVER, BUT WORK REMAINS ON OTHER PARTS OF THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR MAY REDUCE INSPECTIONS OF THE AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER TO ONCE PER MONTH. b. WHERE CONSTRUCTION SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE THE SITE MUST BE INSPECTED DURING NON -FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH FOR A PERIOD OF TWELVE (12) MONTHS. FOLLOWING THE TWELFTH MONTH OF PERMANENT COVER AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, INSPECTIONS MAY BE TERMINATED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS ONCE AGAIN INITIATED UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR IS NOTIFIED IN WRITING BY THE MPCA THAT EROSION ISSUES HAVE BEEN DETECTED AT THE SITE AND INSPECTIONS NEED TO RESUME. c.WHERE WORK HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, THE INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE MUST BEGIN WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER RUNOFF OCCURS AT THE SITE OR 24 HOURS PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMPS, AS WELL AS ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS, UNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT OR THE PROJECT HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION, AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS DURING ALL ROUTINE AND POST -RAINFALL EVENT INSPECTIONS. ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED BELOW. THE CONTRACTOR MUST INVESTIGATE AND COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS: a. ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES ONE-THIRD (1/3) OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR THEREAFTER AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. b. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS MUST BE DRAINED AND THE SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES ONE-HALF (1/2) THE STORAGE VOLUME. DRAINAGE AND REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. c. SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES, WETLANDS AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, MUST BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION DURING EACH INSPECTION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. THE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS. d. CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS MUST BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF-SITE SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO PAVED SURFACES. TRACKED SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES BOTH ON AND OFF SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. e.STREETS AND OTHER AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT MUST BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF-SITE ACCUMULATIONS OF SEDIMENT. IF SEDIMENT IS PRESENT, IT MUST BE REMOVED IN A MANNER AND AT A FREQUENCY SUFFICIENT TO MINIMIZE OFF-SITE IMPACTS (E.G., FUGITIVE SEDIMENT IN STREETS COULD BE WASHED INTO STORM SEWERS BY THE NEXT RAIN AND/OR POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS). PERMANENT BMP DESCRIPTION: TWO SEPARATE INFILTRATION BASINS ARE USED TO TREAT THE RUNOFF FROM THE ADDED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. THE ROADS COLLECT STORMWATER VIA CURB AND GUTTER INTAKES AND THE DITCH WITHIN THE EDMONSON AVENUE R/W AND 85TH ST NE R/W DRAINS TO BASIN 2. IMPAIRED WATERS MAP MANAGEMENT MEASURES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE: 1. STORAGE, HANDLING, AND DISPOSAL OF CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, AND WASTES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING TO MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE TO STORMWATER OF ANY OF THE PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, OR WASTES. PRODUCTS OR WASTES WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER ARE NOT HELD TO THIS REQUIREMENT: a.BUILDING PRODUCTS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS MUST BE UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS OR PROTECTED BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. b. PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICALS, AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS MUST BE UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS OR PROTECTED BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. c. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) MUST BE PROPERLY STORED IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE. d. SOLID WASTE MUST BE STORED, COLLECTED AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035. e.PORTABLE TOILETS MUST BE POSITIONED SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. SANITARY WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041. 2.FUELING AND MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT OR VEHICLES; SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONDUCT FUELING IN A CONTAINED AREA UNLESS INFEASIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. § 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE. 3. VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING: IF THE CONTRACTOR WASHES THE EXTERIOR OF VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT ON THE PROJECT SITE, WASHING MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA MUST BE CONTAINED IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 4.CONCRETE AND OTHER WASHOUTS WASTE: THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THE CONTAINMENT MUST BE DESIGNED SO THAT IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY THAT REQUIRES SITE PERSONNEL TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES FOR DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE AND OTHER WASHOUT WASTES. FINAL STABILIZATION THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. FINAL STABILIZATION IS NOT COMPLETE UNTIL ALL REQUIREMENTS OF ITEMS 13.2-13.5 BELOW: 13.2 PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER. 13.3 PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED. 13.4 PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS (CATCH BASINS, DITCHES, CULVERTS) PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT). 13.5 PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE IN PLACE. SEDIMENT BARRIERS BIOROLL 2. SILT FENCE (MnDOT 3886) INLET PROTECTION DEVICES I. WIMCO (CG -3290 PER CITY DETAIL) 2. INFRASAFE STORM DRAIN/CULVERT ANTI -TRACKING CONTROL I. 2" CRUSHED CLEAR ROCK GRADING ACTIVITY CONCRETE WASHOUT IS DONE BY TRUCK WITH A MOBILE WASHOUT SYSTEM PROVIDED AND COMPLETED BY THE CONCRETE CONTRACTOR. TEMPORARY SEED MIX I. MN STATE SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) 2. MN STATE SEED MIX 22 -III (OATS COVER CROP) PERMANENT SEED MIX/STABILIZATION MN STATE SEED MIX 25-151 (HIGH MAINTENANCE TURF) 2. SOD USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP NOT TO SCALE ACTIVE SWPPP LEGEND Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 375 Forada sandy loam, 0 to 2 1.8 percent slopes 7.6% 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 12.0 percent slopes 50.9% 13778 Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 7.2 30.7% 1975 Oylen sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 2.5 10.8% Totals for Area of Interest 23.5 100.0% USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP NOT TO SCALE ACTIVE SWPPP LEGEND 94, APR MAY JUN JUL AUG d 6 8C OCT NOV DEC � i y h , v'd ➢ r et< 25 SILT FENCE ° W q' F_ Q Z W :2 Z O iybn lb " TEMPORARY MULCH COVER 9 Caunt y tub PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: = M county Road 39 NE Cre OI1t1C 0 C�unfy Road 19 NW 4 W. Z.0� t� _ TEMPORARY HYDROMULCH R4+rr�' NBtVer f82W Ave n ¢�. 71h s F EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ryuy. M Rrsern�w - fR ❑r Aly Sys ROCK DRIVEWAY / ROCK PADS °Rn m School Blvd - ¢�; = d ¢ 5 90th Si NE �.� �__-__ w .'d79.11 .. PROJECT SITE DITCH CHECKS (SEDIMENT LOG) m S - �}h 3t NE - y SOD z �0 m z L �Ry ¢ v 6 0 Ca L - _52 J 1033 N 25 o - - -72 r& S1 NE til county Road 37 NE 375 ff fi 60th St Nl='---------- xINK - USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP NOT TO SCALE ACTIVE SWPPP LEGEND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR SILT FENCE 0 W G F_ Q Z W :2 TEMPORARY MULCH COVER PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 TEMPORARY HYDROMULCH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ROCK DRIVEWAY / ROCK PADS INLET PROTECTION DEVICES DITCH CHECKS (SEDIMENT LOG) SOD STOCKPILES NOTE: CONTRACTOR, GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR SWPPP INSPECTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com J Q F_ F_ M� W ♦♦D V/ H W Q F_ J 0 a z Z Q J z a Z J 0 W CC a z W o > z W Q I= 0. W z 0 a 0 F^_ I- C F J z J W 0 2 a a I= 0 W J Q W > W cc 0 M o 0 a cn I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 2,R0l3662,F0NAtYRMW(G04ffER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY �W V a � ISSUE O 10/7/20 N W Z z Z 0 V) O Z J 0 W G F_ Q Z W :2 J Q F_ F_ M� W ♦♦D V/ H W Q F_ J 0 a z Z Q J z a Z J 0 W CC a z W o > z W Q I= 0. W z 0 a 0 F^_ I- C F J z J W 0 2 a a I= 0 W J Q W > W cc 0 M o 0 a cn I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 2,R0l3662,F0NAtYRMW(G04ffER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 1�6 SHEET 6 OF 13 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W 0 a o oC w z z Z O U) o z J O W � z W 12 J Q F— F— Cl) H m H a J a > z Q J z a z J O W CC a z LU 0 > z w Q oc a LU z 0 Q O F J z J wO 15a a w O F- LU Q W 0 � 0 O F— a. a cn I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 2,RI9l3E62k 1IAaRMN(G0 HER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 7 SHEET 7 OF 13 DISTURBED AREA, CONSTRUCTION SITE, STABILIZED STORAGE AREA OR STAGING AREA 102 Mss O O O EXISTING PAVED 12' MIN CONSTRUCTION MATS, WOVEN OR TRM ROADWAY 50' MIN END OVERLAP 18' MIN SIDE OVERLAP TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES 0 0 STRAP CONNECTORS CONSTRUCTION MAT END OVERLAP INTERLOCK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) EXISTING CURB OF IT 0*5 PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG-23'HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. ' FOR THE NEW R-3290—VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. DEFLECTOR PLATE — OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON—GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH—FLOW FABRIC OVERFLOW OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD NU NU I TACHMENT HOOK T FABRIC SLEEVE R MRDOT SPECIAL OVISION 3886 MOIj SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 oar . x LL� a "c '='1Qo oB,�, w!. a� iLLn Ea Emergency spillway crest / /et Pi e Anti seepage collar (typ.) TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN WITH OUTLET PIPE Emergency spillway crest / et Perforated Standpipe Pi e Anti seepage collar (typ.) TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN WITH STAND PIPE OUTLET Emergency spillway Perforate standpipe 3/4" rock cone T_ T 1/3 Z 1 i D 1" holes spaced 8" to 10" on center NOTE: D = diameter of standpipe equal to diameter of pipe. Pipe material must be rigid STAND PIPE DETAIL Mud Mat Entrance Inlet Protection Inlet Protection Residential Building AStandard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Grate Inlet Cover Standard Plate Library Erosion Control Standard Plate Library City y Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Cit of Monticello Date: 06-14 Plate "°. Cit of Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate Na. CityOf Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate Na. 03-05 Revised: 06-14 6003 Revised: — 6004 Revised* — 6005 Revise d: — 6006 J) Q11 03-15 03 15 03 15 I. ROCK WEEPER MNDOT TYPE 9 MULCH 6-12" (tY" WASHED ROCK) >1.5 DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ANCHORED IN 6" X 6" TRENCH WITH 6", 11 GAUGE METAL STAPLE DOWNSTREAM STAPLES AT 4' INTERVALS SIDE OF FABRIC AT 2' INTERVALS II. BIO WEEPER MNDOT TYPE 9 MULCH 6-12" (1 Y2" WASHED ROCK) >1.5 DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW .III; -111 TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ANCHORED IN 6" X 6" TRENCH Z STAPLE DOWNSTREAM WITH 6", 11 GAUGE METAL SIDE OF FABRIC AT 2' STAPLES AT 4' INTERVALS INTERVALS 6" DIAM. WATTLE WITH MINIMUM 24" SURVEY LATH STAKED 2' O.C. ALONG WATTLE LENGTH Title: Ditch Check Rock IZStandard Plate Library Weeper Bio Log City of Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate No. � Revised: 6008 6008 6' TO ]' DIA. ROLL ENCLOSEDIN J PLASTIC OR POLYESTER NETTING TYPE 2-BIOROLL DITCH CHECK USE ON ROUGH GRADED AREAS 1" X 2" X 18" LONG WOODEN STAKES AT 1, 0" SPACING MAXIMUM. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE BIOROLL AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. gIOROLL PROVIDE 8" TO 10" OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH. 45' FLOW ~ 8' - 10' EMBEDMENT DEPTH BIOROLL STAKING DETAIL NOTE WHEN MORE THAN I BIOROLL/COMPOST LOG IS NEEDED, OVERLAP ENDS A MINIMUM OF 6' AND STAKE Title: Bio Log Staking Standard Plate Library Straw or Wood Bio Roll City of Monticello Date: 03-08 1 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6009 ,.IN—E—SEFONE -UNG SDwNET;N D1NG NEOESSMrnP Li ONOF ONE. FE—DE—DSEED N.,, �,DEEFxN.,,�,w,DE N NDx , �P _D_ 'INDEDD" 'TNEDo��EPDNrDN�rxErNE . DRrxE sr=1,",.rE�`11 o:o­"u���s�O.D� ,r�O' sraaEs�s..xEs soa�a�aox M;Dv;zi�1 P°Ms°�`.,G S——NE.—LO. oTM oFrxE—rEO so�RwNN. a. NourNEsvwxE,s lalDwwi 0x ls.l xonaoxrusrncxossrxF ssDRE. svwxErs mu uxxouwNN awFmrNwrE of vnwusEsauw�rs uusr DE srnxEO w rxiwvaowruresr rsls �`izwnNove—D'�D� DEac x:rE�E;,r`xE�"aNDs:s:D�D".FErxo�r�"ru�EDDv;x�x r r�EDD NDISNiNG�EsrnE,wxxnxaPawtiwniE a�P �,ov nva��sr�ilxaaucx ovEm,wrED uan.uwawmamr,rl�raPnNrncnoss EN,we va0aex�rDI'u:rxs euwKITS _ FsrnnEON srucE �ENGms DnEnrEnrruNs l,s"", w,v De xecFsssnvro Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library Stapling Patterns & Installal City of Monticello Date: I Plate No. Revised:03-08 03-15 6011 Temporary Sediment Basin 03-07 1 6007 03-15 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com J Q F_ H m Cn J a J W a o Z Q J z a Z J O W CC a Z W 0 > Z W Q a W Z Q0 0 V F J Z J W O 2 a a x p W J Q W > W O F_ a cn I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed e,RI9l3E62k 1IAaRMN(G04HER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY Ev F enc DATE 0 ii uV V mm II `4 C ii 2 Q, a PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 I I I 3 ii a A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Emergency spillway crest / /et Pi e Anti seepage collar (typ.) TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN WITH OUTLET PIPE Emergency spillway crest / et Perforated Standpipe Pi e Anti seepage collar (typ.) TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN WITH STAND PIPE OUTLET Emergency spillway Perforate standpipe 3/4" rock cone T_ T 1/3 Z 1 i D 1" holes spaced 8" to 10" on center NOTE: D = diameter of standpipe equal to diameter of pipe. Pipe material must be rigid STAND PIPE DETAIL Mud Mat Entrance Inlet Protection Inlet Protection Residential Building AStandard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Grate Inlet Cover Standard Plate Library Erosion Control Standard Plate Library City y Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Cit of Monticello Date: 06-14 Plate "°. Cit of Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate Na. CityOf Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate Na. 03-05 Revised: 06-14 6003 Revised: — 6004 Revised* — 6005 Revise d: — 6006 J) Q11 03-15 03 15 03 15 I. ROCK WEEPER MNDOT TYPE 9 MULCH 6-12" (tY" WASHED ROCK) >1.5 DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ANCHORED IN 6" X 6" TRENCH WITH 6", 11 GAUGE METAL STAPLE DOWNSTREAM STAPLES AT 4' INTERVALS SIDE OF FABRIC AT 2' INTERVALS II. BIO WEEPER MNDOT TYPE 9 MULCH 6-12" (1 Y2" WASHED ROCK) >1.5 DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW .III; -111 TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ANCHORED IN 6" X 6" TRENCH Z STAPLE DOWNSTREAM WITH 6", 11 GAUGE METAL SIDE OF FABRIC AT 2' STAPLES AT 4' INTERVALS INTERVALS 6" DIAM. WATTLE WITH MINIMUM 24" SURVEY LATH STAKED 2' O.C. ALONG WATTLE LENGTH Title: Ditch Check Rock IZStandard Plate Library Weeper Bio Log City of Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate No. � Revised: 6008 6008 6' TO ]' DIA. ROLL ENCLOSEDIN J PLASTIC OR POLYESTER NETTING TYPE 2-BIOROLL DITCH CHECK USE ON ROUGH GRADED AREAS 1" X 2" X 18" LONG WOODEN STAKES AT 1, 0" SPACING MAXIMUM. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE BIOROLL AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. gIOROLL PROVIDE 8" TO 10" OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH. 45' FLOW ~ 8' - 10' EMBEDMENT DEPTH BIOROLL STAKING DETAIL NOTE WHEN MORE THAN I BIOROLL/COMPOST LOG IS NEEDED, OVERLAP ENDS A MINIMUM OF 6' AND STAKE Title: Bio Log Staking Standard Plate Library Straw or Wood Bio Roll City of Monticello Date: 03-08 1 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6009 ,.IN—E—SEFONE -UNG SDwNET;N D1NG NEOESSMrnP Li ONOF ONE. FE—DE—DSEED N.,, �,DEEFxN.,,�,w,DE N NDx , �P _D_ 'INDEDD" 'TNEDo��EPDNrDN�rxErNE . DRrxE sr=1,",.rE�`11 o:o­"u���s�O.D� ,r�O' sraaEs�s..xEs soa�a�aox M;Dv;zi�1 P°Ms°�`.,G S——NE.—LO. oTM oFrxE—rEO so�RwNN. a. NourNEsvwxE,s lalDwwi 0x ls.l xonaoxrusrncxossrxF ssDRE. svwxErs mu uxxouwNN awFmrNwrE of vnwusEsauw�rs uusr DE srnxEO w rxiwvaowruresr rsls �`izwnNove—D'�D� DEac x:rE�E;,r`xE�"aNDs:s:D�D".FErxo�r�"ru�EDDv;x�x r r�EDD NDISNiNG�EsrnE,wxxnxaPawtiwniE a�P �,ov nva��sr�ilxaaucx ovEm,wrED uan.uwawmamr,rl�raPnNrncnoss EN,we va0aex�rDI'u:rxs euwKITS _ FsrnnEON srucE �ENGms DnEnrEnrruNs l,s"", w,v De xecFsssnvro Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library Stapling Patterns & Installal City of Monticello Date: I Plate No. Revised:03-08 03-15 6011 Temporary Sediment Basin 03-07 1 6007 03-15 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com J Q F_ H m Cn J a J W a o Z Q J z a Z J O W CC a Z W 0 > Z W Q a W Z Q0 0 V F J Z J W O 2 a a x p W J Q W > W O F_ a cn I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed e,RI9l3E62k 1IAaRMN(G04HER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 SHEET 8 OF 13 A�N ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W C'3 a p o � w z z Z O U) o Z J O W � z LU 12 J Q H H m D U) ~ Z J Q a a � z oc z Q J LV F- LU � Q a 0 0 Z Z Q Q LU oc LU a � H W cn cn H >- z 1= W Q a z O Q J cn W J > J W Q O � O W a O I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 SHEET 9 OF 13 Al ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com LU C� Q o 0 oc w z z Z o c o z J 0 w � z LU 12 J Q H H m Cn H a J a oc Q z J W a 0 z z Q 1� LU a LU LU Z C/) LU a 0 O C/) W J > J W Q D � W a O I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DESIGNED: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: DATA DN ST 219-0117 rt SHEET 10 OF 13 1'- 0° OR 5' IN BACK OF CURB IF CONCRETE WALK OR BITUMINOUS PATH PRE HYDRAFINDER PRESENT FLAG WATEROUS MODEL 6] HYDRANT YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG w TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. j AFTER BACK -FILL EXISTING OR FUTURE STREET � BREAKOFF FLANGE CURB OR GUTTER UNE 1° TO 2° MAXIMUM u ABOVE BURY LINE (FINISHED GRADE) FINISHED GRADE Q VALVE BOX AS WATERMMN SPECIFIED 1" TO 2" 2 LAYERS OF � 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 10' POLY (4 mil) u W I L 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PR � �z UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH 1/4 "STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR A MINIMUM OF 1 C.Y. OF 1 n P 1-1/2" CLEAR STONE i WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. MEGALUG OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG GATE VALVE TEE1 THRUST MEGALUG1 BLOCKING BLOCKING BEHIND BELOW GATE THRUST HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE VALVE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15"x 15°x 4'� BEHIND TEE rne: Standard Plate Library Typical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revi�ed:03-05 ,Zoo 1 03-17 T EXISTING (OR FINISHED) GRADE PLUGGED END 4' NOTES: 1. RE -USE EXISTING AIR BLEED ONES AND PLUGS 1' CORPORATION STOP ON PROPOSED SLABS. INSTALLATION TO BE MADE AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. FURNISH NEW GASKETS WHERE REQUIRED. 2. NEW LINES WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNR PRICE BID FOR 1' COPPER AND 1" CORPORATION STOP. AIL OTHER WATERMAIN WORK TO BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 1" COPPER PLUGGED END AIR BLEED DETAIL STEEL T - STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2' REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK VALVE BOX. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF VALVE BOX INSTALUTION (INCIDENTAL) 4' NOTE: GROUND LINE � IF GATE VALVE BOXES ARE EXTENDED, THERE SHALL BE A GATE VALVE NUT EXTENSION TO WITHIN ].5' OF FINISHED GRADE AND ATTACHED TO THE GATE VALVE NUT 2 I VALVE BOX 1/2" RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN THE GATE VALVE AND MIN J.5 ' COVER (UNLESS GATE VALVE ADAPTOR OTHERWISE NOTED) 1/4" STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS 1/2 CU. YD. GRAVEL MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL WATERMAIN GATE VALVE WATERMAIN VALVE BOX INSTALLATION Title: Air Bleed Detail And Standard Plate Library Valve Box Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 2003 2003 Cn5cc MEGALUG MEGALUG WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL POLY P UG TEE AND BEND BEND PLUG NOTES: 1. THRUST BLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1/7 qRD OVER. PIPE SIZE BEARING AREA 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE B 4.0 SO FT WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 PSI. B" 6.0 SO FT 10'- 12' 12.0 SQ FT 3. THRUST BLOCKS BEARING ARCA TO BE POURED 16 20.0 SQ FT AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE USED FOR 12. OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 FT. OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS Title: Standard Plate Library Blocking for Watermain City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -� Revised: 2002 - — 03-17 O i A.:,, L m y I a a M xp o �� oa 5 O o �2 N Y o w r=1=—I �L a a w rrc Z po <J O a Of W z F Y O � LL ma O J o �3 Title: Standard Plate Library Riprap Detail City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4009 4009 03-15 O TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 1008 OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 21°5) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95R OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95Y. OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT _F 0- •:: GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2E GRANUUR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE. AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Title: :Standard Plate LibraryTypical Trench Compactionand Class B Beddinity of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 03-15 1007 IT STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK CURB STOP. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF CURB STOP INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) 4 STREET o 4 12' a 12' AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED GROUND UNE 11'- 0' 11'- 0' GROUND LINE 2' L CURB BOX WITH 1'- 1 1/4 "STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD 7'- 6" MIN COVER 1' CORP. COCK BRICK 1' COPPER 1" COPPER BRICK 4' X 8" X 2" WATERMAIN 4" X 8' X 2" CAP CURB STOP WITH BLANK SWG (TYPICAL) NOTE: ATTACH SHUT OF ROD TO CURB STOP SEE SPEC. rile: Typical Water Standard Plate Library Service City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate "°• Revised: 2006 2006 � � CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) "CRETEX OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT ALL MANHOLES WITH ADJUSTING RINGS INSIDE DROP SECTION MIN 4' -MAX 12" SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) 27 DIA 8 MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CUSS II e CIRCULAR REINF I LATEST REVISION � 5 48' DIA USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS � STEPS AT 16" OC� 8' "CRE -SEAL'; RESEAL', OR APPROVED EQUAL o B" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE MAX. 24" Q 1'- 0° OR 5' IN BACK OF CURB IF CONCRETE WALK OR BITUMINOUS PATH PRE HYDRAFINDER PRESENT FLAG WATEROUS MODEL 6] HYDRANT YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG w TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. j AFTER BACK -FILL EXISTING OR FUTURE STREET � BREAKOFF FLANGE CURB OR GUTTER UNE 1° TO 2° MAXIMUM u ABOVE BURY LINE (FINISHED GRADE) FINISHED GRADE Q VALVE BOX AS WATERMMN SPECIFIED 1" TO 2" 2 LAYERS OF � 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 10' POLY (4 mil) u W I L 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PR � �z UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH 1/4 "STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR A MINIMUM OF 1 C.Y. OF 1 n P 1-1/2" CLEAR STONE i WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. MEGALUG OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG GATE VALVE TEE1 THRUST MEGALUG1 BLOCKING BLOCKING BEHIND BELOW GATE THRUST HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE VALVE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15"x 15°x 4'� BEHIND TEE rne: Standard Plate Library Typical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revi�ed:03-05 ,Zoo 1 03-17 T EXISTING (OR FINISHED) GRADE PLUGGED END 4' NOTES: 1. RE -USE EXISTING AIR BLEED ONES AND PLUGS 1' CORPORATION STOP ON PROPOSED SLABS. INSTALLATION TO BE MADE AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. FURNISH NEW GASKETS WHERE REQUIRED. 2. NEW LINES WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNR PRICE BID FOR 1' COPPER AND 1" CORPORATION STOP. AIL OTHER WATERMAIN WORK TO BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 1" COPPER PLUGGED END AIR BLEED DETAIL STEEL T - STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2' REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK VALVE BOX. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF VALVE BOX INSTALUTION (INCIDENTAL) 4' NOTE: GROUND LINE � IF GATE VALVE BOXES ARE EXTENDED, THERE SHALL BE A GATE VALVE NUT EXTENSION TO WITHIN ].5' OF FINISHED GRADE AND ATTACHED TO THE GATE VALVE NUT 2 I VALVE BOX 1/2" RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN THE GATE VALVE AND MIN J.5 ' COVER (UNLESS GATE VALVE ADAPTOR OTHERWISE NOTED) 1/4" STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS 1/2 CU. YD. GRAVEL MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL WATERMAIN GATE VALVE WATERMAIN VALVE BOX INSTALLATION Title: Air Bleed Detail And Standard Plate Library Valve Box Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 2003 2003 Cn5cc MEGALUG MEGALUG WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL POLY P UG TEE AND BEND BEND PLUG NOTES: 1. THRUST BLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1/7 qRD OVER. PIPE SIZE BEARING AREA 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE B 4.0 SO FT WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 PSI. B" 6.0 SO FT 10'- 12' 12.0 SQ FT 3. THRUST BLOCKS BEARING ARCA TO BE POURED 16 20.0 SQ FT AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE USED FOR 12. OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 FT. OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS Title: Standard Plate Library Blocking for Watermain City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -� Revised: 2002 - — 03-17 O i A.:,, L m y I a a M xp o �� oa 5 O o �2 N Y o w r=1=—I �L a a w rrc Z po <J O a Of W z F Y O � LL ma O J o �3 Title: Standard Plate Library Riprap Detail City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4009 4009 03-15 O TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 1008 OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 21°5) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95R OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95Y. OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT _F 0- •:: GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2E GRANUUR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE. AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Title: :Standard Plate LibraryTypical Trench Compactionand Class B Beddinity of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 03-15 1007 IT STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK CURB STOP. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF CURB STOP INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) 4 STREET o 4 12' a 12' AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED GROUND UNE 11'- 0' 11'- 0' GROUND LINE 2' L CURB BOX WITH 1'- 1 1/4 "STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD 7'- 6" MIN COVER 1' CORP. COCK BRICK 1' COPPER 1" COPPER BRICK 4' X 8" X 2" WATERMAIN 4" X 8' X 2" CAP CURB STOP WITH BLANK SWG (TYPICAL) NOTE: ATTACH SHUT OF ROD TO CURB STOP SEE SPEC. rile: Typical Water Standard Plate Library Service City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate "°• Revised: 2006 2006 � � CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) "CRETEX OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT ALL MANHOLES WITH ADJUSTING RINGS INSIDE DROP SECTION MIN 4' -MAX 12" SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) 27 DIA 8 MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CUSS II e CIRCULAR REINF I LATEST REVISION � 5 48' DIA USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS � STEPS AT 16" OC� 8' "CRE -SEAL'; RESEAL', OR APPROVED EQUAL o B" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE CVARIABLE MAX. 24" Q 6' MIN PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION WITH INVERT �5 AT 12° OC EACH WAY STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE T EXISTING (OR FINISHED) GRADE PLUGGED END 4' NOTES: 1. RE -USE EXISTING AIR BLEED ONES AND PLUGS 1' CORPORATION STOP ON PROPOSED SLABS. INSTALLATION TO BE MADE AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. FURNISH NEW GASKETS WHERE REQUIRED. 2. NEW LINES WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNR PRICE BID FOR 1' COPPER AND 1" CORPORATION STOP. AIL OTHER WATERMAIN WORK TO BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 1" COPPER PLUGGED END AIR BLEED DETAIL STEEL T - STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2' REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK VALVE BOX. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF VALVE BOX INSTALUTION (INCIDENTAL) 4' NOTE: GROUND LINE � IF GATE VALVE BOXES ARE EXTENDED, THERE SHALL BE A GATE VALVE NUT EXTENSION TO WITHIN ].5' OF FINISHED GRADE AND ATTACHED TO THE GATE VALVE NUT 2 I VALVE BOX 1/2" RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN THE GATE VALVE AND MIN J.5 ' COVER (UNLESS GATE VALVE ADAPTOR OTHERWISE NOTED) 1/4" STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS 1/2 CU. YD. GRAVEL MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL WATERMAIN GATE VALVE WATERMAIN VALVE BOX INSTALLATION Title: Air Bleed Detail And Standard Plate Library Valve Box Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 2003 2003 Cn5cc MEGALUG MEGALUG WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL POLY P UG TEE AND BEND BEND PLUG NOTES: 1. THRUST BLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1/7 qRD OVER. PIPE SIZE BEARING AREA 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE B 4.0 SO FT WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 PSI. B" 6.0 SO FT 10'- 12' 12.0 SQ FT 3. THRUST BLOCKS BEARING ARCA TO BE POURED 16 20.0 SQ FT AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE USED FOR 12. OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 FT. OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS Title: Standard Plate Library Blocking for Watermain City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -� Revised: 2002 - — 03-17 O i A.:,, L m y I a a M xp o �� oa 5 O o �2 N Y o w r=1=—I �L a a w rrc Z po <J O a Of W z F Y O � LL ma O J o �3 Title: Standard Plate Library Riprap Detail City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4009 4009 03-15 O TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 1008 OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 21°5) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95R OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95Y. OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT _F 0- •:: GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2E GRANUUR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE. AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Title: :Standard Plate LibraryTypical Trench Compactionand Class B Beddinity of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 03-15 1007 IT STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK CURB STOP. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF CURB STOP INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) 4 STREET o 4 12' a 12' AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED GROUND UNE 11'- 0' 11'- 0' GROUND LINE 2' L CURB BOX WITH 1'- 1 1/4 "STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD 7'- 6" MIN COVER 1' CORP. COCK BRICK 1' COPPER 1" COPPER BRICK 4' X 8" X 2" WATERMAIN 4" X 8' X 2" CAP CURB STOP WITH BLANK SWG (TYPICAL) NOTE: ATTACH SHUT OF ROD TO CURB STOP SEE SPEC. rile: Typical Water Standard Plate Library Service City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate "°• Revised: 2006 2006 � � CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) "CRETEX OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT ALL MANHOLES WITH ADJUSTING RINGS INSIDE DROP SECTION MIN 4' -MAX 12" SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) 27 DIA 8 MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CUSS II e CIRCULAR REINF I LATEST REVISION � 5 48' DIA USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS � STEPS AT 16" OC� 8' "CRE -SEAL'; RESEAL', OR APPROVED EQUAL o B" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE CVARIABLE MAX. 24" Q 6' MIN PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION WITH INVERT �5 AT 12° OC EACH WAY STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE NOTES: 01 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. Q2 IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24° INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. rile: Standard Sanitary Standard Plate Library � Manhole MEGALUG MEGALUG WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL POLY P UG TEE AND BEND BEND PLUG NOTES: 1. THRUST BLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1/7 qRD OVER. PIPE SIZE BEARING AREA 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE B 4.0 SO FT WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 PSI. B" 6.0 SO FT 10'- 12' 12.0 SQ FT 3. THRUST BLOCKS BEARING ARCA TO BE POURED 16 20.0 SQ FT AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE USED FOR 12. OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 FT. OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS Title: Standard Plate Library Blocking for Watermain City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -� Revised: 2002 - — 03-17 O i A.:,, L m y I a a M xp o �� oa 5 O o �2 N Y o w r=1=—I �L a a w rrc Z po <J O a Of W z F Y O � LL ma O J o �3 Title: Standard Plate Library Riprap Detail City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4009 4009 03-15 O TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 1008 OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 21°5) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95R OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95Y. OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT _F 0- •:: GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2E GRANUUR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE. AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Title: :Standard Plate LibraryTypical Trench Compactionand Class B Beddinity of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 03-15 1007 IT STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK CURB STOP. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF CURB STOP INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) 4 STREET o 4 12' a 12' AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED GROUND UNE 11'- 0' 11'- 0' GROUND LINE 2' L CURB BOX WITH 1'- 1 1/4 "STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD 7'- 6" MIN COVER 1' CORP. COCK BRICK 1' COPPER 1" COPPER BRICK 4' X 8" X 2" WATERMAIN 4" X 8' X 2" CAP CURB STOP WITH BLANK SWG (TYPICAL) NOTE: ATTACH SHUT OF ROD TO CURB STOP SEE SPEC. rile: Typical Water Standard Plate Library Service City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate "°• Revised: 2006 2006 � � CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) "CRETEX OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT ALL MANHOLES WITH ADJUSTING RINGS INSIDE DROP SECTION MIN 4' -MAX 12" SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) 27 DIA 8 MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CUSS II e CIRCULAR REINF I LATEST REVISION � 5 48' DIA USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS � STEPS AT 16" OC� 8' "CRE -SEAL'; RESEAL', OR APPROVED EQUAL o B" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE CVARIABLE MAX. 24" Q 6' MIN PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION � � CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) "CRETEX OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT ALL MANHOLES WITH ADJUSTING RINGS INSIDE DROP SECTION MIN 4' -MAX 12" SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) 27 DIA 8 MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CUSS II e CIRCULAR REINF I LATEST REVISION � 5 48' DIA USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS � STEPS AT 16" OC� 8' "CRE -SEAL'; RESEAL', OR APPROVED EQUAL o B" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE CVARIABLE MAX. 24" Q 6' MIN PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION WITH INVERT �5 AT 12° OC EACH WAY STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE NOTES: 01 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. Q2 IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24° INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. rile: Standard Sanitary Standard Plate Library � Manhole City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 3001 Revised: 03-15 N O N O Z A D A 35-1/4" 43" O � PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' � BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION O INSTALL INFRA SHIELD CURB IN FRAME AND CURB BOX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) STANDARD CASTING -NEENAH R -3067-V rn EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL v / ADJUSTING RINGS 4° MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE � MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48° OW COLOR CRETEX TYPE 11 WITH 24'x 36" 6" OPENING +15" 24' 9" a� O � CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE Ci DU CD I +48" P AND PIPE CONNECTION +DIMENSION VARIES •� BASED ON STRUCTURE DIAMETER I� RCP PIPE \ CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX O TYPE 433B OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE 0 -) REQUIRED. V/ CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 0 PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 40061. O THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. N CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEE AH R -3508-A2. X Title: Standard Plate Library Catch Basin Manhole E City of Monticello Date: Plate No. � 03-05 � Revised: 4003 4003 STEEL T- TYLE FENCE POST PAINTED GREEN WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND A MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK THE SERVICE STUB TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE DEPTH OF COVER OVER INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) 4" OR 6" PVC TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT 4" FIELD CONDITIONS MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED AND SHALL HAVE CLASS "B" BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER is 6" SEE JOINT DETAIL BELOW MIN R 4. PLACE NEARLY HORIZONTAL FOR LOW 12 BASEMENTS AND SHALLOW SEWER AS DRAINAGE AND DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER UTILITY EASEMENT GROUND , LINE TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR LESS 2' NOTES: 5 PVC = POLY-WNri CHLORIDE SDR 26 DEPTH OF COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS INCLUDING NECESSARY FIELD CONDITIONS BENDS AND SPECIAL FITTINGS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE RID PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4" OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPEN54TION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 4" OR 6" PVC 45'BEND WYE ELEV TO BE SET BY THE ENGINEER -CONTRACTOR 4" / L" i0 VERIFY PRIOR TO BURY MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED AND SHALL HAVE CUSS °B" BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER CONCRETE ENCASEMENT _ (TYPICAL) SEE DETAIL BELOW FOR B" CAULKING BETWEEN MIN - DISSIMILAR PIPES TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER ADAPTER TO BE RESILIENT TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR MORE ASTM C425-64 TYPE III OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR DISSIMILAR PIPES '�•� CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYPICAL) PVC WE �---- VCP TO PVC FERNCO ENCASED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING VCP SEWER MAIN (INCIDENTAL). CONCRETE ENCASEMENT� • DETAIL • \ (TYPICAL) `THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Service Connection City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 3004 03-15 Al TYPICAL HOLE LOCATIONS 4" DIA 4' DIA 120' 9P 160' CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE WITH PROTECTIVE WRAP PVCPP WITH PROTECTIVE WRAP 6" B/C� BITUMINOUS SURFACE AGGREGATE BASE Q1.51 GRANULAR SUBGRADE 1' 4� ® 4" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC TYPICAL ENCASED WITH COARSE AGGREGATE(MNDOT 3149.2H). INSTALL WHERE CLAY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE, LOW POINTS IN ROADWAY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Title: Standard Plate Library Perforated P.E. Pipe With Fabric City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 4006 4006 STREET BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT INSTALLED AS PER Cltt CONTRACT TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND UNE I TRACER WIRE SPLICE I CURB BOX STANDPIPE I I COPPER -CUD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE I 2' SPOOL COPPER -CIAO STEEL AWG 12 TRACER WIRE 30 NIL HIGH DENSITY ' GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY I PO ME GREEN COLORED JACKET POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET I TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE I TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT CONTRACT ; \ 1 COPPER WATERMAIN COPPER -CUD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY PoLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT SANDARY SERWCE MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER Title: Tracer Wire Standard Plate Library (New Developments) City of Monticello Date: o3—os Plate "°• R8V1SOd:03-15 3005 NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS 24' OR LARGER SHEET PILING AS SHOWN SHALIS L BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO FLARED END. NUTS AND BOLTS ON TRASH GUARD MUST REMAIN EXPOSED. 12" 4000 PSI CONCRETE (TYP) TIE LAST 3 JOINTS ON i� -I IN AND OUREI �) (3) 1 1/4 'HOLES USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT 5/8' TIE FOR PIPES 12' TO 2J' PLAN 3/4' PE FOR PIPES 30' TO 66' 1" TIE FOR PIPES OVER 30' 4000 PSI CONCRETE (3) 1 1/4 "HOLES USE (3) 1' BOL AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT /4 REBPR EACH FACE - (lYP) I1 I SHEET PILING NTERLOCK _�4 REBAR EACH FACE w 10 GAUGE MINIMUM - L OUTSIDE WIDTH OF END I f SEC110N PLUS 4'- 0 PROVIDE OPENING WHEN POURING CONCRETE TO ATTACH TRASH GUARD ELEVATION Title: Standard Plate Library Piling for Flared End Section City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 4008 4008 :2 � CASTING [ADJUSTING RINGS 4' MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME &COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD o z 8" CAST -IN-PLACE PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP � ® CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE � CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 4' TO 10• (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED a y BY ENGINEER o CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON � OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION O S PL STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS—I—PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. Q MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT e" ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MANHOLE MANHOLE; MAY BE USED OR ': PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH © GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY BASIN BASIN TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT DIA IA CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer City of Monticello Dote: Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4001 03-17 J 35 1/4 43' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH LA0. R -306]-V PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALMORRIS Mill 111112111111 L INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12° MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE 5• COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 24" FINISH 11 GRADE 2 2" 5' ' 34 4' MIN 1r¢. 4 MIN 5 4' CONCRETE COLUft Notes: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLOR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Catch Basin City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4002 03-17 R W 60. R 12' OR 14' 30', 32' OR 36' FACE TO FACE ® VARIES MODIFIED DESIGN D CURB GUTTER 6° � SVOPi i 4.00R 2.007 2.00% A'� F -W A� 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, ANO MULCH OR SOD 10 (TYPICAL) 2' 1 1/2 "TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE TACK COAT MNDOT 235] 2° TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON-WEMING COURSE 6" CU55 V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6' BEHIND CURB) 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION URBAN RESIDENTIAL 01 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB AND SIDEWALK/TRAIL. THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL COND IONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. © STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ® 6" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CUY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE PLATE 400fi FOR DETAILS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Street Residential (Minor) City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Reviaed:03-17 5002 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W O LL.I Z Z Z J O w 0 Z W J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 STEEL T- TYLE FENCE POST PAINTED GREEN WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND A MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK THE SERVICE STUB TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE DEPTH OF COVER OVER INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) 4" OR 6" PVC TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT 4" FIELD CONDITIONS MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED AND SHALL HAVE CLASS "B" BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER is 6" SEE JOINT DETAIL BELOW MIN R 4. PLACE NEARLY HORIZONTAL FOR LOW 12 BASEMENTS AND SHALLOW SEWER AS DRAINAGE AND DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER UTILITY EASEMENT GROUND , LINE TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR LESS 2' NOTES: 5 PVC = POLY-WNri CHLORIDE SDR 26 DEPTH OF COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS INCLUDING NECESSARY FIELD CONDITIONS BENDS AND SPECIAL FITTINGS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE RID PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4" OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPEN54TION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 4" OR 6" PVC 45'BEND WYE ELEV TO BE SET BY THE ENGINEER -CONTRACTOR 4" / L" i0 VERIFY PRIOR TO BURY MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED AND SHALL HAVE CUSS °B" BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER CONCRETE ENCASEMENT _ (TYPICAL) SEE DETAIL BELOW FOR B" CAULKING BETWEEN MIN - DISSIMILAR PIPES TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER ADAPTER TO BE RESILIENT TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR MORE ASTM C425-64 TYPE III OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR DISSIMILAR PIPES '�•� CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYPICAL) PVC WE �---- VCP TO PVC FERNCO ENCASED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING VCP SEWER MAIN (INCIDENTAL). CONCRETE ENCASEMENT� • DETAIL • \ (TYPICAL) `THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Service Connection City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 3004 03-15 Al TYPICAL HOLE LOCATIONS 4" DIA 4' DIA 120' 9P 160' CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE WITH PROTECTIVE WRAP PVCPP WITH PROTECTIVE WRAP 6" B/C� BITUMINOUS SURFACE AGGREGATE BASE Q1.51 GRANULAR SUBGRADE 1' 4� ® 4" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC TYPICAL ENCASED WITH COARSE AGGREGATE(MNDOT 3149.2H). INSTALL WHERE CLAY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE, LOW POINTS IN ROADWAY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Title: Standard Plate Library Perforated P.E. Pipe With Fabric City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 4006 4006 STREET BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT INSTALLED AS PER Cltt CONTRACT TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND UNE I TRACER WIRE SPLICE I CURB BOX STANDPIPE I I COPPER -CUD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE I 2' SPOOL COPPER -CIAO STEEL AWG 12 TRACER WIRE 30 NIL HIGH DENSITY ' GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY I PO ME GREEN COLORED JACKET POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET I TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE I TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT CONTRACT ; \ 1 COPPER WATERMAIN COPPER -CUD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY PoLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT SANDARY SERWCE MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER Title: Tracer Wire Standard Plate Library (New Developments) City of Monticello Date: o3—os Plate "°• R8V1SOd:03-15 3005 NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS 24' OR LARGER SHEET PILING AS SHOWN SHALIS L BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO FLARED END. NUTS AND BOLTS ON TRASH GUARD MUST REMAIN EXPOSED. 12" 4000 PSI CONCRETE (TYP) TIE LAST 3 JOINTS ON i� -I IN AND OUREI �) (3) 1 1/4 'HOLES USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT 5/8' TIE FOR PIPES 12' TO 2J' PLAN 3/4' PE FOR PIPES 30' TO 66' 1" TIE FOR PIPES OVER 30' 4000 PSI CONCRETE (3) 1 1/4 "HOLES USE (3) 1' BOL AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT /4 REBPR EACH FACE - (lYP) I1 I SHEET PILING NTERLOCK _�4 REBAR EACH FACE w 10 GAUGE MINIMUM - L OUTSIDE WIDTH OF END I f SEC110N PLUS 4'- 0 PROVIDE OPENING WHEN POURING CONCRETE TO ATTACH TRASH GUARD ELEVATION Title: Standard Plate Library Piling for Flared End Section City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 4008 4008 :2 � CASTING [ADJUSTING RINGS 4' MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME &COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD o z 8" CAST -IN-PLACE PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP � ® CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE � CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 4' TO 10• (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED a y BY ENGINEER o CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON � OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION O S PL STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS—I—PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. Q MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT e" ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MANHOLE MANHOLE; MAY BE USED OR ': PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH © GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY BASIN BASIN TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT DIA IA CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer City of Monticello Dote: Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4001 03-17 J 35 1/4 43' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH LA0. R -306]-V PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALMORRIS Mill 111112111111 L INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12° MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE 5• COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 24" FINISH 11 GRADE 2 2" 5' ' 34 4' MIN 1r¢. 4 MIN 5 4' CONCRETE COLUft Notes: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLOR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Catch Basin City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4002 03-17 R W 60. R 12' OR 14' 30', 32' OR 36' FACE TO FACE ® VARIES MODIFIED DESIGN D CURB GUTTER 6° � SVOPi i 4.00R 2.007 2.00% A'� F -W A� 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, ANO MULCH OR SOD 10 (TYPICAL) 2' 1 1/2 "TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE TACK COAT MNDOT 235] 2° TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON-WEMING COURSE 6" CU55 V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6' BEHIND CURB) 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION URBAN RESIDENTIAL 01 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB AND SIDEWALK/TRAIL. THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL COND IONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. © STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ® 6" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CUY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE PLATE 400fi FOR DETAILS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Street Residential (Minor) City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Reviaed:03-17 5002 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W O LL.I Z Z Z J O w 0 Z W J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 TYPICAL HOLE LOCATIONS 4" DIA 4' DIA 120' 9P 160' CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE WITH PROTECTIVE WRAP PVCPP WITH PROTECTIVE WRAP 6" B/C� BITUMINOUS SURFACE AGGREGATE BASE Q1.51 GRANULAR SUBGRADE 1' 4� ® 4" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC TYPICAL ENCASED WITH COARSE AGGREGATE(MNDOT 3149.2H). INSTALL WHERE CLAY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE, LOW POINTS IN ROADWAY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Title: Standard Plate Library Perforated P.E. Pipe With Fabric City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 4006 4006 STREET BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT INSTALLED AS PER Cltt CONTRACT TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND UNE I TRACER WIRE SPLICE I CURB BOX STANDPIPE I I COPPER -CUD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE I 2' SPOOL COPPER -CIAO STEEL AWG 12 TRACER WIRE 30 NIL HIGH DENSITY ' GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY I PO ME GREEN COLORED JACKET POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET I TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE I TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT CONTRACT ; \ 1 COPPER WATERMAIN COPPER -CUD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY PoLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT SANDARY SERWCE MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER Title: Tracer Wire Standard Plate Library (New Developments) City of Monticello Date: o3—os Plate "°• R8V1SOd:03-15 3005 NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS 24' OR LARGER SHEET PILING AS SHOWN SHALIS L BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO FLARED END. NUTS AND BOLTS ON TRASH GUARD MUST REMAIN EXPOSED. 12" 4000 PSI CONCRETE (TYP) TIE LAST 3 JOINTS ON i� -I IN AND OUREI �) (3) 1 1/4 'HOLES USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT 5/8' TIE FOR PIPES 12' TO 2J' PLAN 3/4' PE FOR PIPES 30' TO 66' 1" TIE FOR PIPES OVER 30' 4000 PSI CONCRETE (3) 1 1/4 "HOLES USE (3) 1' BOL AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT /4 REBPR EACH FACE - (lYP) I1 I SHEET PILING NTERLOCK _�4 REBAR EACH FACE w 10 GAUGE MINIMUM - L OUTSIDE WIDTH OF END I f SEC110N PLUS 4'- 0 PROVIDE OPENING WHEN POURING CONCRETE TO ATTACH TRASH GUARD ELEVATION Title: Standard Plate Library Piling for Flared End Section City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 4008 4008 :2 � CASTING [ADJUSTING RINGS 4' MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME &COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD o z 8" CAST -IN-PLACE PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP � ® CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE � CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 4' TO 10• (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED a y BY ENGINEER o CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON � OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION O S PL STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS—I—PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. Q MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT e" ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MANHOLE MANHOLE; MAY BE USED OR ': PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH © GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY BASIN BASIN TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT DIA IA CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer City of Monticello Dote: Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4001 03-17 J 35 1/4 43' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH LA0. R -306]-V PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALMORRIS Mill 111112111111 L INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12° MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE 5• COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 24" FINISH 11 GRADE 2 2" 5' ' 34 4' MIN 1r¢. 4 MIN 5 4' CONCRETE COLUft Notes: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLOR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Catch Basin City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4002 03-17 R W 60. R 12' OR 14' 30', 32' OR 36' FACE TO FACE ® VARIES MODIFIED DESIGN D CURB GUTTER 6° � SVOPi i 4.00R 2.007 2.00% A'� F -W A� 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, ANO MULCH OR SOD 10 (TYPICAL) 2' 1 1/2 "TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE TACK COAT MNDOT 235] 2° TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON-WEMING COURSE 6" CU55 V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6' BEHIND CURB) 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION URBAN RESIDENTIAL 01 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB AND SIDEWALK/TRAIL. THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL COND IONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. © STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ® 6" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CUY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE PLATE 400fi FOR DETAILS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Street Residential (Minor) City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Reviaed:03-17 5002 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W O LL.I Z Z Z J O w 0 Z W J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 STREET BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT INSTALLED AS PER Cltt CONTRACT TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND UNE I TRACER WIRE SPLICE I CURB BOX STANDPIPE I I COPPER -CUD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE I 2' SPOOL COPPER -CIAO STEEL AWG 12 TRACER WIRE 30 NIL HIGH DENSITY ' GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY I PO ME GREEN COLORED JACKET POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET I TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE I TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT CONTRACT ; \ 1 COPPER WATERMAIN COPPER -CUD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY PoLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT SANDARY SERWCE MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER Title: Tracer Wire Standard Plate Library (New Developments) City of Monticello Date: o3—os Plate "°• R8V1SOd:03-15 3005 NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS 24' OR LARGER SHEET PILING AS SHOWN SHALIS L BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO FLARED END. NUTS AND BOLTS ON TRASH GUARD MUST REMAIN EXPOSED. 12" 4000 PSI CONCRETE (TYP) TIE LAST 3 JOINTS ON i� -I IN AND OUREI �) (3) 1 1/4 'HOLES USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT 5/8' TIE FOR PIPES 12' TO 2J' PLAN 3/4' PE FOR PIPES 30' TO 66' 1" TIE FOR PIPES OVER 30' 4000 PSI CONCRETE (3) 1 1/4 "HOLES USE (3) 1' BOL AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT /4 REBPR EACH FACE - (lYP) I1 I SHEET PILING NTERLOCK _�4 REBAR EACH FACE w 10 GAUGE MINIMUM - L OUTSIDE WIDTH OF END I f SEC110N PLUS 4'- 0 PROVIDE OPENING WHEN POURING CONCRETE TO ATTACH TRASH GUARD ELEVATION Title: Standard Plate Library Piling for Flared End Section City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 4008 4008 :2 � CASTING [ADJUSTING RINGS 4' MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME &COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD o z 8" CAST -IN-PLACE PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP � ® CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE � CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 4' TO 10• (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED a y BY ENGINEER o CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON � OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION O S PL STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS—I—PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. Q MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT e" ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MANHOLE MANHOLE; MAY BE USED OR ': PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH © GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY BASIN BASIN TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT DIA IA CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer City of Monticello Dote: Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4001 03-17 J 35 1/4 43' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH LA0. R -306]-V PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALMORRIS Mill 111112111111 L INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12° MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE 5• COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 24" FINISH 11 GRADE 2 2" 5' ' 34 4' MIN 1r¢. 4 MIN 5 4' CONCRETE COLUft Notes: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLOR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Catch Basin City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4002 03-17 R W 60. R 12' OR 14' 30', 32' OR 36' FACE TO FACE ® VARIES MODIFIED DESIGN D CURB GUTTER 6° � SVOPi i 4.00R 2.007 2.00% A'� F -W A� 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, ANO MULCH OR SOD 10 (TYPICAL) 2' 1 1/2 "TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE TACK COAT MNDOT 235] 2° TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON-WEMING COURSE 6" CU55 V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6' BEHIND CURB) 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION URBAN RESIDENTIAL 01 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB AND SIDEWALK/TRAIL. THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL COND IONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. © STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ® 6" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CUY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE PLATE 400fi FOR DETAILS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Street Residential (Minor) City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Reviaed:03-17 5002 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W O LL.I Z Z Z J O w 0 Z W J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS 24' OR LARGER SHEET PILING AS SHOWN SHALIS L BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO FLARED END. NUTS AND BOLTS ON TRASH GUARD MUST REMAIN EXPOSED. 12" 4000 PSI CONCRETE (TYP) TIE LAST 3 JOINTS ON i� -I IN AND OUREI �) (3) 1 1/4 'HOLES USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT 5/8' TIE FOR PIPES 12' TO 2J' PLAN 3/4' PE FOR PIPES 30' TO 66' 1" TIE FOR PIPES OVER 30' 4000 PSI CONCRETE (3) 1 1/4 "HOLES USE (3) 1' BOL AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT /4 REBPR EACH FACE - (lYP) I1 I SHEET PILING NTERLOCK _�4 REBAR EACH FACE w 10 GAUGE MINIMUM - L OUTSIDE WIDTH OF END I f SEC110N PLUS 4'- 0 PROVIDE OPENING WHEN POURING CONCRETE TO ATTACH TRASH GUARD ELEVATION Title: Standard Plate Library Piling for Flared End Section City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 4008 4008 :2 � CASTING [ADJUSTING RINGS 4' MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME &COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD o z 8" CAST -IN-PLACE PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP � ® CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE � CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 4' TO 10• (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED a y BY ENGINEER o CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON � OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION O S PL STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS—I—PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. Q MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT e" ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MANHOLE MANHOLE; MAY BE USED OR ': PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH © GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY BASIN BASIN TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT DIA IA CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer City of Monticello Dote: Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4001 03-17 J 35 1/4 43' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH LA0. R -306]-V PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALMORRIS Mill 111112111111 L INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12° MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE 5• COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 24" FINISH 11 GRADE 2 2" 5' ' 34 4' MIN 1r¢. 4 MIN 5 4' CONCRETE COLUft Notes: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLOR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Catch Basin City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4002 03-17 R W 60. R 12' OR 14' 30', 32' OR 36' FACE TO FACE ® VARIES MODIFIED DESIGN D CURB GUTTER 6° � SVOPi i 4.00R 2.007 2.00% A'� F -W A� 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, ANO MULCH OR SOD 10 (TYPICAL) 2' 1 1/2 "TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE TACK COAT MNDOT 235] 2° TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON-WEMING COURSE 6" CU55 V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6' BEHIND CURB) 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION URBAN RESIDENTIAL 01 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB AND SIDEWALK/TRAIL. THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL COND IONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. © STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ® 6" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CUY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE PLATE 400fi FOR DETAILS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Street Residential (Minor) City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Reviaed:03-17 5002 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W O LL.I Z Z Z J O w 0 Z W J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 � CASTING [ADJUSTING RINGS 4' MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME &COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD o z 8" CAST -IN-PLACE PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP � ® CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE � CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 4' TO 10• (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED a y BY ENGINEER o CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON � OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION O S PL STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS—I—PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. Q MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT e" ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MANHOLE MANHOLE; MAY BE USED OR ': PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH © GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY BASIN BASIN TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT DIA IA CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer City of Monticello Dote: Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4001 03-17 J 35 1/4 43' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH LA0. R -306]-V PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALMORRIS Mill 111112111111 L INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12° MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE 5• COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 24" FINISH 11 GRADE 2 2" 5' ' 34 4' MIN 1r¢. 4 MIN 5 4' CONCRETE COLUft Notes: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLOR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Catch Basin City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4002 03-17 R W 60. R 12' OR 14' 30', 32' OR 36' FACE TO FACE ® VARIES MODIFIED DESIGN D CURB GUTTER 6° � SVOPi i 4.00R 2.007 2.00% A'� F -W A� 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, ANO MULCH OR SOD 10 (TYPICAL) 2' 1 1/2 "TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE TACK COAT MNDOT 235] 2° TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON-WEMING COURSE 6" CU55 V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6' BEHIND CURB) 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION URBAN RESIDENTIAL 01 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB AND SIDEWALK/TRAIL. THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL COND IONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. © STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ® 6" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CUY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE PLATE 400fi FOR DETAILS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Street Residential (Minor) City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Reviaed:03-17 5002 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W O LL.I Z Z Z J O w 0 Z W J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 J 35 1/4 43' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH LA0. R -306]-V PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALMORRIS Mill 111112111111 L INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12° MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE 5• COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 24" FINISH 11 GRADE 2 2" 5' ' 34 4' MIN 1r¢. 4 MIN 5 4' CONCRETE COLUft Notes: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLOR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Catch Basin City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 4002 03-17 R W 60. R 12' OR 14' 30', 32' OR 36' FACE TO FACE ® VARIES MODIFIED DESIGN D CURB GUTTER 6° � SVOPi i 4.00R 2.007 2.00% A'� F -W A� 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, ANO MULCH OR SOD 10 (TYPICAL) 2' 1 1/2 "TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE TACK COAT MNDOT 235] 2° TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON-WEMING COURSE 6" CU55 V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6' BEHIND CURB) 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION URBAN RESIDENTIAL 01 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB AND SIDEWALK/TRAIL. THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL COND IONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. © STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ® 6" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CUY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE PLATE 400fi FOR DETAILS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Street Residential (Minor) City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Reviaed:03-17 5002 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W O LL.I Z Z Z J O w 0 Z W J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 R W 60. R 12' OR 14' 30', 32' OR 36' FACE TO FACE ® VARIES MODIFIED DESIGN D CURB GUTTER 6° � SVOPi i 4.00R 2.007 2.00% A'� F -W A� 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, ANO MULCH OR SOD 10 (TYPICAL) 2' 1 1/2 "TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE TACK COAT MNDOT 235] 2° TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON-WEMING COURSE 6" CU55 V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6' BEHIND CURB) 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION URBAN RESIDENTIAL 01 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB AND SIDEWALK/TRAIL. THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL COND IONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. © STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ® 6" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CUY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE PLATE 400fi FOR DETAILS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Street Residential (Minor) City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Reviaed:03-17 5002 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W O LL.I Z Z Z J O w 0 Z W J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com W O LL.I Z Z Z J O w 0 Z W J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 J Q 5� Q J a oc Q Z J W a In Z Q W F— SLw I / Z 5W a O W W a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT LA0: 219-0117 11 SHEET 1 1 OF 13 1 H 12" yI 3/4 " /PE I^yI 1/2 " R /2 R " 3� 3 7" 2'- 0" MODIFIED DESIGN "D" 5'- 0(TYPICAL) STANDARD FRAME & BOX FOR B618 CURB & GUTTER 4: 7 MAk 2.0 % 4: MAk o 3- SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2.8) 6" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MODIFIED) 12• SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MODIFIED DESIGN b" CURB & 8618 u GUTTER (TYPICAL_ SEE ABOVE) 0 PLAN FABRIC IF DIRECTED BY ENGINEER TIP/� 0" MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PIATES. aa0000000e MATCH MODIFIED DESIGN CURB & GUTTER (TYPICAL) 3. MODIFY SURFACING. BASE. AND SUBGRADE DESIGN BASED ON '3'- B. 8618) (TOTAL) '`--- NOTE: STORM SEWER TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS INCLUDES A 0.10' DEPRESSION FROM THE PROPOSED GUTTER GRADE. THE CONCRETE CURB SHOULD BE TRANSITIONED FROM THE PROPOSED GUTTER GRADE TO THE CASTING ELEVATION 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CENTER OF THE CASTING. Title: Concrete Curb & Gutter Standard Plate Library at Catch Basin City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised:5004 - - 03-15 1 O N O N O rn/ ALL UCAYi1770N & BACKRLL TO COMPLY WDH CITY EXCAVA77ON ORDINANCES AND REQUIRE EXCAVABON PERMIT FROM PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE t— UTIUTY EASEMENT P/L 12 11•_13• LOT STAKE za «x 6' 6' i STREET TYPICAL TYPICAL . - nazw "� LOPE uIu°c wx u MN �i ar crcnu +� EASEMENT INSTALLATION O v DRAINAGE & UTIUtt SEWER AND WATER STUBBED 11' INSIDE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT UNE (%) TELEPHONE, N OR FIBER PHONE. N OR FIBER +� PEDESTAL EDESTAL O E C. CENTERLINE (�J IN THE EVENT OF A HYDRANT S JOINT TRENCH AT A PROPERTY CORNER. MOVE SEE DETAIL ABOVE ELEC. TRANS. AND PEDESTALS BACK F TO MAINTAIN 10' CLEAR SPACE _ F t' I� PROPERTY UNE at 6• CONCRETE POSSIBLE '. SIDEWALK '•.', if(DRANT O TREE PIANTING AREA ---STREET LIGHTING TREET UGHTIN EET LIGHTING - BACK OF CURB O ALL ROAD CROSSINGS TO BE RIGID NMC CONDUITS N X R/W TO R/W WHERE SIDEWALK OR PATHWAY IS INSTALLED. Title: Standard Plate Library Joint Trench Utility for New Residential Developments City of Monticello Date: 03-08 Plate No. —'' Revised:7002 03-15 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY HORIZONTAL (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION DIVIDER PLATE 3•R 3"R 31' SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT 6" 13 1/2 OR SLOPE 3/4}-/R 2- MIN rZ• 7•I y i e HORIZONTA UNE MNDOT (D SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0474 CU YDS / UN R (8612) MAY BE TILTED 8612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 21.1 R CU. YDS. B612 DIVIDER PLATE 3•R 1 .. 6 1/2 • 3"R 3� o SLOPE -0.06 R/R 13 1/2 6" - SLOPE 3/4'/FF I�.I1 D 2- MIN r2• 7•� :. P, / / 8 HORIZONTA UNE / 0 / MNDO SLOPE 006 FT/FTNORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE N0. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER MAY BE TILOTED IS PERMITTED, RIE FORM CONCRETE - 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 18 2 CU 17.2 FT / U (8618) .YDS. (8618) 12• 3/4 / PER R 3• 1/2 - R 1/2 ' R 3 7-E . HORIZONTAL—,,110 UNE _____ I" 2—O___� MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Title: Standard Plate Library Concrete Curb & Gutter for Streets City of Monticello Date: 03-0Plate No. 5 - - --- Revised: 5005 03-15 NOTE: ALL WOOD SHALL BE CEDAR OR TREATED MAILBOX HEIGHT & OFFSET TABLE O HEIGM 1 OFFSET 2 • CURB & GUTTER DESIGN (IN) (IN) B6 41 - 42 11 MoD b" 44 - 45 15 MAILBOX NOTFC. 10TOP OF CURB TO FLOOR OF MAILBOX Q BACK OF CURB TO FRONT OF MAILBOX, FOR INSTALLATIONS IN RURAL LOCATIONS OFFSET ADS 4- Q FROM OF MAILBOX 9"-12- FROM BOX) EDGE OF TURNOUT OR USABLE SHOULDER 30 PROVIDE YELLOW 3- ROUND REFLECTOR ON APPROACH SIDE OF POST (FIRST POST ONLY FOR TWO POST INSTALLATIONS) ®PROVIDE 3- SEPARATION BETWEEN MAILBOXES 6- SQUARE CEDAR OR TREATED --\O WOOD POST //—BRUMINQUS ROADWAY `T..) �ulx'�///\// .'. \//\\//\\//\\//\\� MODIFIED b' CURB 8 GUTTER C-) NOTE: MINIMUM 3 MAILBOXES TO MAXIMUM 8 MAILBOXES NOTE: 1 MAILBOX TO MAXIMUM 2 MAILBOXES ON SINGLE POST ON DOUBLE POST INSTALLATION INSTALLATION HSB HSE NSE HSN SE NNSE NSE NSE B8E NSE x x x x x x x x x x ADS ADS ABS ADS ABS ADS ADS ABS BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ Title: Mailbox Detail Standard Plate Library New -Residential City of Monticello Date:03-07 Plate No. Re1TIsed03-15 5014 PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 2.0% MIN. PAD WIDTH = 40', 48' 2.0% PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 70' PAD 2s' FINISH GRADE o 'n � N GRADING GRADE 0.0% 0 BASEMENT FLOOR LOOKOUT PAD FINISH GRADING G/R, 0.0% T 0 1T.%1IK9 0la41I7 VARIES CONTRACTION JOINT (SAWED OR PREFORMED) ON 16' OR WIDER DRIVE 3/8 " x 1' FORMED CONTRACTION 3/8 " z 1" FORMED CONTRACTION JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER X261" EXPANSION JOINT CONTRACTION JOINTS EXPANSION JOINT PLAN WHERE SIDEWALKS EXIST OR STEEL TO BE USED WHEN 6• ARE PROPOSED, THE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY SLAB IS NOT POURED SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE INTEGRAL WITH GUTTER SIDEWALK. MAINTAIN 2% SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE THROUGH DRIVEWAY. .. 113.5' 7- PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY SHALL BE FROM BACK OF CURB SECTION Title: Standard Plate Library Residential Driveway Entrance City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 5007 Street Sign � i TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL: ALUMINUM SHALL BE: 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30" .100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE OVER 30" SIGNS SHALL BE NOTCHED FOR USE WITH E-450 BRACKETS 2-3/8" O.D. 9" STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL HAVE 6" UPPER CASE LETTERS WHITE ON GREEN HIGH INTENSITY GRADE SHEETING WITH WHITE SERIES E BORDER o ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, n SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. BOULEVARD GRADE 11111111-IIIIIII-IIIIIII eq a —1111111;�11AIlll_IIIIIIII II�(IIIIIII IIIIIII ^° `� (Ih 3� TUBULAR POSTS SPECIFICATIONS (IIIIIII —1111 ° 4 (III ILII IIIIII— q IIIIIII—(IIIIIII TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC =ILII III° CONTROL SIGNS, SHALL VARY IN LENGTH, SHALL HAVE A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI- ROTATION IIIIIII — DEVICE TO PREVENT TUBE FROM TURNING, SHALL BE a 2-3/8" O.D., SHALL BE GALVINIZED AND SHALL HAVE lllllll 4 A WEIGHT OF 2LB./FT. CONCRETE GROUTL{III ILLI NOTE: CONCRETE GROUT TO BE MIXED THOROUGHLY WITH WATER BEFORE INSTALLATION NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET NAME SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Traffic Sign Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. - -_=-� 03-05 Revised: 5017 03-15 3 O IY V — SETBACK O m 15' VARIES VARIES FINISH GRADE GRADE SETBACK m 15' ------VARIES VARIES VARIES 25'WISH GRADE GRADE 3 O G_ U SETBACK m 70' 15' ---VARIES— —VARIES PAD ,fINISH GRADE N TOPSOIL �SUBGRADE RADIN�GIADE -I i :.T__TZTt #'kl I AQ HOLD DOWN DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 15" RCP © 0.0 I I\I\/=Q Tin F L 0 W EXPANSION JOINT (TYPICAL) REMOVE CROWN TYPE B6 CONCRETE IN 50' CURB & GUTTER TI P GUTTER OUT Ir -A A e FLOW B-618 - 3' WIDE B-624 - 4' WIDE 3' MIN. SLOPE 3/4 "/FT. SECTION A—A Title: Typical Concrete Standard Plate Library Valley Gutter City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -�� Revised`03-15 5009 C 0 4x4 TREATED POST N E 3" WIDE BY 30" LONG BROWN ALUMINUM SIGN WITH 1-1/2- V HIGH WHITE LETTERING 31" A T I O N 4'-0" A R E A 17" GRADE SET POST IN QUICKCRETE FAST -SETTING CONCRETE OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIN 12" DIA HOLE 4'-0" Title: Standard Plate Library Conservation Easement Post Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. -__-> Revised: 03-15 5020 CASTING PER CITY DETAIL OCS OVERFLOW GRATE RIM=951.50 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS2) NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINTS 7' 6' 2% MAXIMUM pROpER� UNE CROSS SLOPE 6 3" 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date:Plate No. Revised:03-05 5012 —�-- 03-17 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 BITUMINOUS TRAIL DESIGN OA - PATHWAY WIDTH 10 ft © - SHOULDER WIDTH 1 ft MIN. 3' TO 6' A O 4: 7 MAk 2.0 % 4: MAk 3- SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2.8) 6" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MODIFIED) 12• SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 6- MINIMUM SCARIFY AND RE COMPACT (SUBGRADE PREP) FABRIC IF DIRECTED BY ENGINEER NOTES: 1. TRAIL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PIATES. 2. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOMES AND CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS. 3. MODIFY SURFACING. BASE. AND SUBGRADE DESIGN BASED ON IXPECTED VEHICULAR USE AND SUBGRADE SOILS. Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Trail Section City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. �' -- --_ 5 013 Revised: -- - _ 03-15 O N O N O rn/ ALL UCAYi1770N & BACKRLL TO COMPLY WDH CITY EXCAVA77ON ORDINANCES AND REQUIRE EXCAVABON PERMIT FROM PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE t— UTIUTY EASEMENT P/L 12 11•_13• LOT STAKE za «x 6' 6' i STREET TYPICAL TYPICAL . - nazw "� LOPE uIu°c wx u MN �i ar crcnu +� EASEMENT INSTALLATION O v DRAINAGE & UTIUtt SEWER AND WATER STUBBED 11' INSIDE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT UNE (%) TELEPHONE, N OR FIBER PHONE. N OR FIBER +� PEDESTAL EDESTAL O E C. CENTERLINE (�J IN THE EVENT OF A HYDRANT S JOINT TRENCH AT A PROPERTY CORNER. MOVE SEE DETAIL ABOVE ELEC. TRANS. AND PEDESTALS BACK F TO MAINTAIN 10' CLEAR SPACE _ F t' I� PROPERTY UNE at 6• CONCRETE POSSIBLE '. SIDEWALK '•.', if(DRANT O TREE PIANTING AREA ---STREET LIGHTING TREET UGHTIN EET LIGHTING - BACK OF CURB O ALL ROAD CROSSINGS TO BE RIGID NMC CONDUITS N X R/W TO R/W WHERE SIDEWALK OR PATHWAY IS INSTALLED. Title: Standard Plate Library Joint Trench Utility for New Residential Developments City of Monticello Date: 03-08 Plate No. —'' Revised:7002 03-15 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY HORIZONTAL (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION DIVIDER PLATE 3•R 3"R 31' SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT 6" 13 1/2 OR SLOPE 3/4}-/R 2- MIN rZ• 7•I y i e HORIZONTA UNE MNDOT (D SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0474 CU YDS / UN R (8612) MAY BE TILTED 8612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 21.1 R CU. YDS. B612 DIVIDER PLATE 3•R 1 .. 6 1/2 • 3"R 3� o SLOPE -0.06 R/R 13 1/2 6" - SLOPE 3/4'/FF I�.I1 D 2- MIN r2• 7•� :. P, / / 8 HORIZONTA UNE / 0 / MNDO SLOPE 006 FT/FTNORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE N0. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER MAY BE TILOTED IS PERMITTED, RIE FORM CONCRETE - 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 18 2 CU 17.2 FT / U (8618) .YDS. (8618) 12• 3/4 / PER R 3• 1/2 - R 1/2 ' R 3 7-E . HORIZONTAL—,,110 UNE _____ I" 2—O___� MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Title: Standard Plate Library Concrete Curb & Gutter for Streets City of Monticello Date: 03-0Plate No. 5 - - --- Revised: 5005 03-15 NOTE: ALL WOOD SHALL BE CEDAR OR TREATED MAILBOX HEIGHT & OFFSET TABLE O HEIGM 1 OFFSET 2 • CURB & GUTTER DESIGN (IN) (IN) B6 41 - 42 11 MoD b" 44 - 45 15 MAILBOX NOTFC. 10TOP OF CURB TO FLOOR OF MAILBOX Q BACK OF CURB TO FRONT OF MAILBOX, FOR INSTALLATIONS IN RURAL LOCATIONS OFFSET ADS 4- Q FROM OF MAILBOX 9"-12- FROM BOX) EDGE OF TURNOUT OR USABLE SHOULDER 30 PROVIDE YELLOW 3- ROUND REFLECTOR ON APPROACH SIDE OF POST (FIRST POST ONLY FOR TWO POST INSTALLATIONS) ®PROVIDE 3- SEPARATION BETWEEN MAILBOXES 6- SQUARE CEDAR OR TREATED --\O WOOD POST //—BRUMINQUS ROADWAY `T..) �ulx'�///\// .'. \//\\//\\//\\//\\� MODIFIED b' CURB 8 GUTTER C-) NOTE: MINIMUM 3 MAILBOXES TO MAXIMUM 8 MAILBOXES NOTE: 1 MAILBOX TO MAXIMUM 2 MAILBOXES ON SINGLE POST ON DOUBLE POST INSTALLATION INSTALLATION HSB HSE NSE HSN SE NNSE NSE NSE B8E NSE x x x x x x x x x x ADS ADS ABS ADS ABS ADS ADS ABS BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ Title: Mailbox Detail Standard Plate Library New -Residential City of Monticello Date:03-07 Plate No. Re1TIsed03-15 5014 PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 2.0% MIN. PAD WIDTH = 40', 48' 2.0% PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 70' PAD 2s' FINISH GRADE o 'n � N GRADING GRADE 0.0% 0 BASEMENT FLOOR LOOKOUT PAD FINISH GRADING G/R, 0.0% T 0 1T.%1IK9 0la41I7 VARIES CONTRACTION JOINT (SAWED OR PREFORMED) ON 16' OR WIDER DRIVE 3/8 " x 1' FORMED CONTRACTION 3/8 " z 1" FORMED CONTRACTION JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER X261" EXPANSION JOINT CONTRACTION JOINTS EXPANSION JOINT PLAN WHERE SIDEWALKS EXIST OR STEEL TO BE USED WHEN 6• ARE PROPOSED, THE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY SLAB IS NOT POURED SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE INTEGRAL WITH GUTTER SIDEWALK. MAINTAIN 2% SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE THROUGH DRIVEWAY. .. 113.5' 7- PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY SHALL BE FROM BACK OF CURB SECTION Title: Standard Plate Library Residential Driveway Entrance City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 5007 Street Sign � i TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL: ALUMINUM SHALL BE: 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30" .100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE OVER 30" SIGNS SHALL BE NOTCHED FOR USE WITH E-450 BRACKETS 2-3/8" O.D. 9" STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL HAVE 6" UPPER CASE LETTERS WHITE ON GREEN HIGH INTENSITY GRADE SHEETING WITH WHITE SERIES E BORDER o ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, n SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. BOULEVARD GRADE 11111111-IIIIIII-IIIIIII eq a —1111111;�11AIlll_IIIIIIII II�(IIIIIII IIIIIII ^° `� (Ih 3� TUBULAR POSTS SPECIFICATIONS (IIIIIII —1111 ° 4 (III ILII IIIIII— q IIIIIII—(IIIIIII TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC =ILII III° CONTROL SIGNS, SHALL VARY IN LENGTH, SHALL HAVE A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI- ROTATION IIIIIII — DEVICE TO PREVENT TUBE FROM TURNING, SHALL BE a 2-3/8" O.D., SHALL BE GALVINIZED AND SHALL HAVE lllllll 4 A WEIGHT OF 2LB./FT. CONCRETE GROUTL{III ILLI NOTE: CONCRETE GROUT TO BE MIXED THOROUGHLY WITH WATER BEFORE INSTALLATION NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET NAME SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Traffic Sign Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. - -_=-� 03-05 Revised: 5017 03-15 3 O IY V — SETBACK O m 15' VARIES VARIES FINISH GRADE GRADE SETBACK m 15' ------VARIES VARIES VARIES 25'WISH GRADE GRADE 3 O G_ U SETBACK m 70' 15' ---VARIES— —VARIES PAD ,fINISH GRADE N TOPSOIL �SUBGRADE RADIN�GIADE -I i :.T__TZTt #'kl I AQ HOLD DOWN DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 15" RCP © 0.0 I I\I\/=Q Tin F L 0 W EXPANSION JOINT (TYPICAL) REMOVE CROWN TYPE B6 CONCRETE IN 50' CURB & GUTTER TI P GUTTER OUT Ir -A A e FLOW B-618 - 3' WIDE B-624 - 4' WIDE 3' MIN. SLOPE 3/4 "/FT. SECTION A—A Title: Typical Concrete Standard Plate Library Valley Gutter City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -�� Revised`03-15 5009 C 0 4x4 TREATED POST N E 3" WIDE BY 30" LONG BROWN ALUMINUM SIGN WITH 1-1/2- V HIGH WHITE LETTERING 31" A T I O N 4'-0" A R E A 17" GRADE SET POST IN QUICKCRETE FAST -SETTING CONCRETE OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIN 12" DIA HOLE 4'-0" Title: Standard Plate Library Conservation Easement Post Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. -__-> Revised: 03-15 5020 CASTING PER CITY DETAIL OCS OVERFLOW GRATE RIM=951.50 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS2) NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINTS 7' 6' 2% MAXIMUM pROpER� UNE CROSS SLOPE 6 3" 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date:Plate No. Revised:03-05 5012 —�-- 03-17 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY HORIZONTAL (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION DIVIDER PLATE 3•R 3"R 31' SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT 6" 13 1/2 OR SLOPE 3/4}-/R 2- MIN rZ• 7•I y i e HORIZONTA UNE MNDOT (D SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0474 CU YDS / UN R (8612) MAY BE TILTED 8612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 21.1 R CU. YDS. B612 DIVIDER PLATE 3•R 1 .. 6 1/2 • 3"R 3� o SLOPE -0.06 R/R 13 1/2 6" - SLOPE 3/4'/FF I�.I1 D 2- MIN r2• 7•� :. P, / / 8 HORIZONTA UNE / 0 / MNDO SLOPE 006 FT/FTNORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE N0. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER MAY BE TILOTED IS PERMITTED, RIE FORM CONCRETE - 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 18 2 CU 17.2 FT / U (8618) .YDS. (8618) 12• 3/4 / PER R 3• 1/2 - R 1/2 ' R 3 7-E . HORIZONTAL—,,110 UNE _____ I" 2—O___� MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Title: Standard Plate Library Concrete Curb & Gutter for Streets City of Monticello Date: 03-0Plate No. 5 - - --- Revised: 5005 03-15 NOTE: ALL WOOD SHALL BE CEDAR OR TREATED MAILBOX HEIGHT & OFFSET TABLE O HEIGM 1 OFFSET 2 • CURB & GUTTER DESIGN (IN) (IN) B6 41 - 42 11 MoD b" 44 - 45 15 MAILBOX NOTFC. 10TOP OF CURB TO FLOOR OF MAILBOX Q BACK OF CURB TO FRONT OF MAILBOX, FOR INSTALLATIONS IN RURAL LOCATIONS OFFSET ADS 4- Q FROM OF MAILBOX 9"-12- FROM BOX) EDGE OF TURNOUT OR USABLE SHOULDER 30 PROVIDE YELLOW 3- ROUND REFLECTOR ON APPROACH SIDE OF POST (FIRST POST ONLY FOR TWO POST INSTALLATIONS) ®PROVIDE 3- SEPARATION BETWEEN MAILBOXES 6- SQUARE CEDAR OR TREATED --\O WOOD POST //—BRUMINQUS ROADWAY `T..) �ulx'�///\// .'. \//\\//\\//\\//\\� MODIFIED b' CURB 8 GUTTER C-) NOTE: MINIMUM 3 MAILBOXES TO MAXIMUM 8 MAILBOXES NOTE: 1 MAILBOX TO MAXIMUM 2 MAILBOXES ON SINGLE POST ON DOUBLE POST INSTALLATION INSTALLATION HSB HSE NSE HSN SE NNSE NSE NSE B8E NSE x x x x x x x x x x ADS ADS ABS ADS ABS ADS ADS ABS BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ Title: Mailbox Detail Standard Plate Library New -Residential City of Monticello Date:03-07 Plate No. Re1TIsed03-15 5014 PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 2.0% MIN. PAD WIDTH = 40', 48' 2.0% PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 70' PAD 2s' FINISH GRADE o 'n � N GRADING GRADE 0.0% 0 BASEMENT FLOOR LOOKOUT PAD FINISH GRADING G/R, 0.0% T 0 1T.%1IK9 0la41I7 VARIES CONTRACTION JOINT (SAWED OR PREFORMED) ON 16' OR WIDER DRIVE 3/8 " x 1' FORMED CONTRACTION 3/8 " z 1" FORMED CONTRACTION JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER X261" EXPANSION JOINT CONTRACTION JOINTS EXPANSION JOINT PLAN WHERE SIDEWALKS EXIST OR STEEL TO BE USED WHEN 6• ARE PROPOSED, THE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY SLAB IS NOT POURED SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE INTEGRAL WITH GUTTER SIDEWALK. MAINTAIN 2% SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE THROUGH DRIVEWAY. .. 113.5' 7- PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY SHALL BE FROM BACK OF CURB SECTION Title: Standard Plate Library Residential Driveway Entrance City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 5007 Street Sign � i TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL: ALUMINUM SHALL BE: 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30" .100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE OVER 30" SIGNS SHALL BE NOTCHED FOR USE WITH E-450 BRACKETS 2-3/8" O.D. 9" STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL HAVE 6" UPPER CASE LETTERS WHITE ON GREEN HIGH INTENSITY GRADE SHEETING WITH WHITE SERIES E BORDER o ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, n SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. BOULEVARD GRADE 11111111-IIIIIII-IIIIIII eq a —1111111;�11AIlll_IIIIIIII II�(IIIIIII IIIIIII ^° `� (Ih 3� TUBULAR POSTS SPECIFICATIONS (IIIIIII —1111 ° 4 (III ILII IIIIII— q IIIIIII—(IIIIIII TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC =ILII III° CONTROL SIGNS, SHALL VARY IN LENGTH, SHALL HAVE A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI- ROTATION IIIIIII — DEVICE TO PREVENT TUBE FROM TURNING, SHALL BE a 2-3/8" O.D., SHALL BE GALVINIZED AND SHALL HAVE lllllll 4 A WEIGHT OF 2LB./FT. CONCRETE GROUTL{III ILLI NOTE: CONCRETE GROUT TO BE MIXED THOROUGHLY WITH WATER BEFORE INSTALLATION NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET NAME SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Traffic Sign Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. - -_=-� 03-05 Revised: 5017 03-15 3 O IY V — SETBACK O m 15' VARIES VARIES FINISH GRADE GRADE SETBACK m 15' ------VARIES VARIES VARIES 25'WISH GRADE GRADE 3 O G_ U SETBACK m 70' 15' ---VARIES— —VARIES PAD ,fINISH GRADE N TOPSOIL �SUBGRADE RADIN�GIADE -I i :.T__TZTt #'kl I AQ HOLD DOWN DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 15" RCP © 0.0 I I\I\/=Q Tin F L 0 W EXPANSION JOINT (TYPICAL) REMOVE CROWN TYPE B6 CONCRETE IN 50' CURB & GUTTER TI P GUTTER OUT Ir -A A e FLOW B-618 - 3' WIDE B-624 - 4' WIDE 3' MIN. SLOPE 3/4 "/FT. SECTION A—A Title: Typical Concrete Standard Plate Library Valley Gutter City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -�� Revised`03-15 5009 C 0 4x4 TREATED POST N E 3" WIDE BY 30" LONG BROWN ALUMINUM SIGN WITH 1-1/2- V HIGH WHITE LETTERING 31" A T I O N 4'-0" A R E A 17" GRADE SET POST IN QUICKCRETE FAST -SETTING CONCRETE OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIN 12" DIA HOLE 4'-0" Title: Standard Plate Library Conservation Easement Post Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. -__-> Revised: 03-15 5020 CASTING PER CITY DETAIL OCS OVERFLOW GRATE RIM=951.50 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS2) NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINTS 7' 6' 2% MAXIMUM pROpER� UNE CROSS SLOPE 6 3" 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date:Plate No. Revised:03-05 5012 —�-- 03-17 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 NOTE: ALL WOOD SHALL BE CEDAR OR TREATED MAILBOX HEIGHT & OFFSET TABLE O HEIGM 1 OFFSET 2 • CURB & GUTTER DESIGN (IN) (IN) B6 41 - 42 11 MoD b" 44 - 45 15 MAILBOX NOTFC. 10TOP OF CURB TO FLOOR OF MAILBOX Q BACK OF CURB TO FRONT OF MAILBOX, FOR INSTALLATIONS IN RURAL LOCATIONS OFFSET ADS 4- Q FROM OF MAILBOX 9"-12- FROM BOX) EDGE OF TURNOUT OR USABLE SHOULDER 30 PROVIDE YELLOW 3- ROUND REFLECTOR ON APPROACH SIDE OF POST (FIRST POST ONLY FOR TWO POST INSTALLATIONS) ®PROVIDE 3- SEPARATION BETWEEN MAILBOXES 6- SQUARE CEDAR OR TREATED --\O WOOD POST //—BRUMINQUS ROADWAY `T..) �ulx'�///\// .'. \//\\//\\//\\//\\� MODIFIED b' CURB 8 GUTTER C-) NOTE: MINIMUM 3 MAILBOXES TO MAXIMUM 8 MAILBOXES NOTE: 1 MAILBOX TO MAXIMUM 2 MAILBOXES ON SINGLE POST ON DOUBLE POST INSTALLATION INSTALLATION HSB HSE NSE HSN SE NNSE NSE NSE B8E NSE x x x x x x x x x x ADS ADS ABS ADS ABS ADS ADS ABS BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX BOX \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ Title: Mailbox Detail Standard Plate Library New -Residential City of Monticello Date:03-07 Plate No. Re1TIsed03-15 5014 PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 2.0% MIN. PAD WIDTH = 40', 48' 2.0% PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 70' PAD 2s' FINISH GRADE o 'n � N GRADING GRADE 0.0% 0 BASEMENT FLOOR LOOKOUT PAD FINISH GRADING G/R, 0.0% T 0 1T.%1IK9 0la41I7 VARIES CONTRACTION JOINT (SAWED OR PREFORMED) ON 16' OR WIDER DRIVE 3/8 " x 1' FORMED CONTRACTION 3/8 " z 1" FORMED CONTRACTION JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER X261" EXPANSION JOINT CONTRACTION JOINTS EXPANSION JOINT PLAN WHERE SIDEWALKS EXIST OR STEEL TO BE USED WHEN 6• ARE PROPOSED, THE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY SLAB IS NOT POURED SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE INTEGRAL WITH GUTTER SIDEWALK. MAINTAIN 2% SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE THROUGH DRIVEWAY. .. 113.5' 7- PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY SHALL BE FROM BACK OF CURB SECTION Title: Standard Plate Library Residential Driveway Entrance City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 5007 Street Sign � i TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL: ALUMINUM SHALL BE: 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30" .100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE OVER 30" SIGNS SHALL BE NOTCHED FOR USE WITH E-450 BRACKETS 2-3/8" O.D. 9" STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL HAVE 6" UPPER CASE LETTERS WHITE ON GREEN HIGH INTENSITY GRADE SHEETING WITH WHITE SERIES E BORDER o ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, n SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. BOULEVARD GRADE 11111111-IIIIIII-IIIIIII eq a —1111111;�11AIlll_IIIIIIII II�(IIIIIII IIIIIII ^° `� (Ih 3� TUBULAR POSTS SPECIFICATIONS (IIIIIII —1111 ° 4 (III ILII IIIIII— q IIIIIII—(IIIIIII TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC =ILII III° CONTROL SIGNS, SHALL VARY IN LENGTH, SHALL HAVE A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI- ROTATION IIIIIII — DEVICE TO PREVENT TUBE FROM TURNING, SHALL BE a 2-3/8" O.D., SHALL BE GALVINIZED AND SHALL HAVE lllllll 4 A WEIGHT OF 2LB./FT. CONCRETE GROUTL{III ILLI NOTE: CONCRETE GROUT TO BE MIXED THOROUGHLY WITH WATER BEFORE INSTALLATION NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET NAME SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Traffic Sign Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. - -_=-� 03-05 Revised: 5017 03-15 3 O IY V — SETBACK O m 15' VARIES VARIES FINISH GRADE GRADE SETBACK m 15' ------VARIES VARIES VARIES 25'WISH GRADE GRADE 3 O G_ U SETBACK m 70' 15' ---VARIES— —VARIES PAD ,fINISH GRADE N TOPSOIL �SUBGRADE RADIN�GIADE -I i :.T__TZTt #'kl I AQ HOLD DOWN DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 15" RCP © 0.0 I I\I\/=Q Tin F L 0 W EXPANSION JOINT (TYPICAL) REMOVE CROWN TYPE B6 CONCRETE IN 50' CURB & GUTTER TI P GUTTER OUT Ir -A A e FLOW B-618 - 3' WIDE B-624 - 4' WIDE 3' MIN. SLOPE 3/4 "/FT. SECTION A—A Title: Typical Concrete Standard Plate Library Valley Gutter City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -�� Revised`03-15 5009 C 0 4x4 TREATED POST N E 3" WIDE BY 30" LONG BROWN ALUMINUM SIGN WITH 1-1/2- V HIGH WHITE LETTERING 31" A T I O N 4'-0" A R E A 17" GRADE SET POST IN QUICKCRETE FAST -SETTING CONCRETE OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIN 12" DIA HOLE 4'-0" Title: Standard Plate Library Conservation Easement Post Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. -__-> Revised: 03-15 5020 CASTING PER CITY DETAIL OCS OVERFLOW GRATE RIM=951.50 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS2) NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINTS 7' 6' 2% MAXIMUM pROpER� UNE CROSS SLOPE 6 3" 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date:Plate No. Revised:03-05 5012 —�-- 03-17 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 2.0% MIN. PAD WIDTH = 40', 48' 2.0% PAD WIDTH = 40'. 48' 70' PAD 2s' FINISH GRADE o 'n � N GRADING GRADE 0.0% 0 BASEMENT FLOOR LOOKOUT PAD FINISH GRADING G/R, 0.0% T 0 1T.%1IK9 0la41I7 VARIES CONTRACTION JOINT (SAWED OR PREFORMED) ON 16' OR WIDER DRIVE 3/8 " x 1' FORMED CONTRACTION 3/8 " z 1" FORMED CONTRACTION JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT JOINT TO BE SEALED WITH HOT POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER POURED CONCRETE JOINT SEALER X261" EXPANSION JOINT CONTRACTION JOINTS EXPANSION JOINT PLAN WHERE SIDEWALKS EXIST OR STEEL TO BE USED WHEN 6• ARE PROPOSED, THE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY SLAB IS NOT POURED SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE INTEGRAL WITH GUTTER SIDEWALK. MAINTAIN 2% SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE THROUGH DRIVEWAY. .. 113.5' 7- PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY SHALL BE FROM BACK OF CURB SECTION Title: Standard Plate Library Residential Driveway Entrance City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 5007 Street Sign � i TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL: ALUMINUM SHALL BE: 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30" .100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE OVER 30" SIGNS SHALL BE NOTCHED FOR USE WITH E-450 BRACKETS 2-3/8" O.D. 9" STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL HAVE 6" UPPER CASE LETTERS WHITE ON GREEN HIGH INTENSITY GRADE SHEETING WITH WHITE SERIES E BORDER o ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, n SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. BOULEVARD GRADE 11111111-IIIIIII-IIIIIII eq a —1111111;�11AIlll_IIIIIIII II�(IIIIIII IIIIIII ^° `� (Ih 3� TUBULAR POSTS SPECIFICATIONS (IIIIIII —1111 ° 4 (III ILII IIIIII— q IIIIIII—(IIIIIII TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC =ILII III° CONTROL SIGNS, SHALL VARY IN LENGTH, SHALL HAVE A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI- ROTATION IIIIIII — DEVICE TO PREVENT TUBE FROM TURNING, SHALL BE a 2-3/8" O.D., SHALL BE GALVINIZED AND SHALL HAVE lllllll 4 A WEIGHT OF 2LB./FT. CONCRETE GROUTL{III ILLI NOTE: CONCRETE GROUT TO BE MIXED THOROUGHLY WITH WATER BEFORE INSTALLATION NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET NAME SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Traffic Sign Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. - -_=-� 03-05 Revised: 5017 03-15 3 O IY V — SETBACK O m 15' VARIES VARIES FINISH GRADE GRADE SETBACK m 15' ------VARIES VARIES VARIES 25'WISH GRADE GRADE 3 O G_ U SETBACK m 70' 15' ---VARIES— —VARIES PAD ,fINISH GRADE N TOPSOIL �SUBGRADE RADIN�GIADE -I i :.T__TZTt #'kl I AQ HOLD DOWN DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 15" RCP © 0.0 I I\I\/=Q Tin F L 0 W EXPANSION JOINT (TYPICAL) REMOVE CROWN TYPE B6 CONCRETE IN 50' CURB & GUTTER TI P GUTTER OUT Ir -A A e FLOW B-618 - 3' WIDE B-624 - 4' WIDE 3' MIN. SLOPE 3/4 "/FT. SECTION A—A Title: Typical Concrete Standard Plate Library Valley Gutter City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -�� Revised`03-15 5009 C 0 4x4 TREATED POST N E 3" WIDE BY 30" LONG BROWN ALUMINUM SIGN WITH 1-1/2- V HIGH WHITE LETTERING 31" A T I O N 4'-0" A R E A 17" GRADE SET POST IN QUICKCRETE FAST -SETTING CONCRETE OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIN 12" DIA HOLE 4'-0" Title: Standard Plate Library Conservation Easement Post Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. -__-> Revised: 03-15 5020 CASTING PER CITY DETAIL OCS OVERFLOW GRATE RIM=951.50 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS2) NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINTS 7' 6' 2% MAXIMUM pROpER� UNE CROSS SLOPE 6 3" 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date:Plate No. Revised:03-05 5012 —�-- 03-17 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 Street Sign � i TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL: ALUMINUM SHALL BE: 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30" .100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE OVER 30" SIGNS SHALL BE NOTCHED FOR USE WITH E-450 BRACKETS 2-3/8" O.D. 9" STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL HAVE 6" UPPER CASE LETTERS WHITE ON GREEN HIGH INTENSITY GRADE SHEETING WITH WHITE SERIES E BORDER o ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, n SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. BOULEVARD GRADE 11111111-IIIIIII-IIIIIII eq a —1111111;�11AIlll_IIIIIIII II�(IIIIIII IIIIIII ^° `� (Ih 3� TUBULAR POSTS SPECIFICATIONS (IIIIIII —1111 ° 4 (III ILII IIIIII— q IIIIIII—(IIIIIII TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC =ILII III° CONTROL SIGNS, SHALL VARY IN LENGTH, SHALL HAVE A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI- ROTATION IIIIIII — DEVICE TO PREVENT TUBE FROM TURNING, SHALL BE a 2-3/8" O.D., SHALL BE GALVINIZED AND SHALL HAVE lllllll 4 A WEIGHT OF 2LB./FT. CONCRETE GROUTL{III ILLI NOTE: CONCRETE GROUT TO BE MIXED THOROUGHLY WITH WATER BEFORE INSTALLATION NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET NAME SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Traffic Sign Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. - -_=-� 03-05 Revised: 5017 03-15 3 O IY V — SETBACK O m 15' VARIES VARIES FINISH GRADE GRADE SETBACK m 15' ------VARIES VARIES VARIES 25'WISH GRADE GRADE 3 O G_ U SETBACK m 70' 15' ---VARIES— —VARIES PAD ,fINISH GRADE N TOPSOIL �SUBGRADE RADIN�GIADE -I i :.T__TZTt #'kl I AQ HOLD DOWN DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 15" RCP © 0.0 I I\I\/=Q Tin F L 0 W EXPANSION JOINT (TYPICAL) REMOVE CROWN TYPE B6 CONCRETE IN 50' CURB & GUTTER TI P GUTTER OUT Ir -A A e FLOW B-618 - 3' WIDE B-624 - 4' WIDE 3' MIN. SLOPE 3/4 "/FT. SECTION A—A Title: Typical Concrete Standard Plate Library Valley Gutter City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -�� Revised`03-15 5009 C 0 4x4 TREATED POST N E 3" WIDE BY 30" LONG BROWN ALUMINUM SIGN WITH 1-1/2- V HIGH WHITE LETTERING 31" A T I O N 4'-0" A R E A 17" GRADE SET POST IN QUICKCRETE FAST -SETTING CONCRETE OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIN 12" DIA HOLE 4'-0" Title: Standard Plate Library Conservation Easement Post Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. -__-> Revised: 03-15 5020 CASTING PER CITY DETAIL OCS OVERFLOW GRATE RIM=951.50 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS2) NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINTS 7' 6' 2% MAXIMUM pROpER� UNE CROSS SLOPE 6 3" 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date:Plate No. Revised:03-05 5012 —�-- 03-17 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 3 O IY V — SETBACK O m 15' VARIES VARIES FINISH GRADE GRADE SETBACK m 15' ------VARIES VARIES VARIES 25'WISH GRADE GRADE 3 O G_ U SETBACK m 70' 15' ---VARIES— —VARIES PAD ,fINISH GRADE N TOPSOIL �SUBGRADE RADIN�GIADE -I i :.T__TZTt #'kl I AQ HOLD DOWN DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 15" RCP © 0.0 I I\I\/=Q Tin F L 0 W EXPANSION JOINT (TYPICAL) REMOVE CROWN TYPE B6 CONCRETE IN 50' CURB & GUTTER TI P GUTTER OUT Ir -A A e FLOW B-618 - 3' WIDE B-624 - 4' WIDE 3' MIN. SLOPE 3/4 "/FT. SECTION A—A Title: Typical Concrete Standard Plate Library Valley Gutter City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 -�� Revised`03-15 5009 C 0 4x4 TREATED POST N E 3" WIDE BY 30" LONG BROWN ALUMINUM SIGN WITH 1-1/2- V HIGH WHITE LETTERING 31" A T I O N 4'-0" A R E A 17" GRADE SET POST IN QUICKCRETE FAST -SETTING CONCRETE OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIN 12" DIA HOLE 4'-0" Title: Standard Plate Library Conservation Easement Post Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. -__-> Revised: 03-15 5020 CASTING PER CITY DETAIL OCS OVERFLOW GRATE RIM=951.50 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS2) NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINTS 7' 6' 2% MAXIMUM pROpER� UNE CROSS SLOPE 6 3" 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date:Plate No. Revised:03-05 5012 —�-- 03-17 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 C 0 4x4 TREATED POST N E 3" WIDE BY 30" LONG BROWN ALUMINUM SIGN WITH 1-1/2- V HIGH WHITE LETTERING 31" A T I O N 4'-0" A R E A 17" GRADE SET POST IN QUICKCRETE FAST -SETTING CONCRETE OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIN 12" DIA HOLE 4'-0" Title: Standard Plate Library Conservation Easement Post Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. -__-> Revised: 03-15 5020 CASTING PER CITY DETAIL OCS OVERFLOW GRATE RIM=951.50 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS2) NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINTS 7' 6' 2% MAXIMUM pROpER� UNE CROSS SLOPE 6 3" 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date:Plate No. Revised:03-05 5012 —�-- 03-17 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 CASTING PER CITY DETAIL OCS OVERFLOW GRATE RIM=951.50 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS2) NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINTS 7' 6' 2% MAXIMUM pROpER� UNE CROSS SLOPE 6 3" 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date:Plate No. Revised:03-05 5012 —�-- 03-17 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 STAKES NOT RECOMMENDED UNLESS THE TRUNK PRUNING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONY BROKEN, EASILY WAIVERS 3"-5". DEAD, OR DAMAGED LIMBS AND SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPEARANCE OF THE TREE. TRUNKS OF THIN BARK SPECIES TO BE WRAPPED FOR WINTER MONTHS OR FALL PLANTINGS. ADJUST TREE SO THAT ROOT FLARE STANDS LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ROPES AND WIRES 3"-4" LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS HOLDING THE BURLAP IN PLACE, PULL BURLAP BACK DOWN TO EXPOSE TOP OF BALL. ROTOTILLED AREA -12" DEPTH r r\' 2 TO 5 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER FIRM SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING Title: Typical Tree Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-15 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6012 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W a V 0 0 LLJ Z Z Z 0 �wJ � / O Z J O LSI 0Z W 12 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA J a H m a J a oc a Z G J W cc CL 0 Z a W 0 a L) ■ Z W 2 CL 0 IJ W I W J � a � W a o hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of DAVE NASH, PE 11/10/20 21836 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 10/7/20 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 11/10/20 PRELIM. PLAT RESUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: ST PROJECT NO: 219-0117 12 SHEET 12 OF 13 POND SEED MIX (SEE LEGEND) 2;7/ -WB 7-( 1–RF i v 1–RM 1–KC –RF 4–BH CKTU___`Q I I I I 10 11 IIII I I L_ L- L 3–CH I I 23 I I I IL L I I I A I I 12 L- I 22 L 3–FM r--� I 3–CM 2–KC J A E MONSON WAY -- - 3–RB _ T 0 , 1–RM 1–RF , , � I I J 1—RM 21 -J r - °ins \ / J L_ -J 7 4—SS 7 � > 1 –RM 1 –RM 3–CH I 1 , 1–FM IPP, 1 –SS \ \\ 1–KC '��in� , \ 4–RB \1–SS J I �\ \� 1—CM I �, 4 �� � a r --J LI ' �_ \ \ - 1 –RF I \ w, L------- I , I -------------- k 3–BH C 1 v 3–FM v 1 –WB -- 11 3–CM 17 I r - I i , I I i i W ----1 –RM - ----- 1 –FM JI 1 - 1–RB _J I L- 3 -WB 2 L -- 12 W I I I I > I ,, -- ------ Q 16 r --J V r- L- r LU O 1—WB— Y -� 1 '-2—CM L-- 1 L- W rJ I I- 4 —BH I I I , L71 r - -J � , 01 2–CH / 15 – 0 1 –RB r -------L 3–FM , 1–WB– 1–SS�1 FM\\lu�f 1 SS 1–RM � 1 –WB , •, � 47'SS 19 14 4–WB I 18 E 3–CH 15 --_1_–RF ^ 17 16 ' / I I IL / 3–RB / 0 1–RM ,' / e < 1–RM , 2–BH F2� 4–CM 13 ' 3–CH ' v 1–RF / / A 3–KC 3–FM / / / 4 N o TH ST NE / V i /40 / 1–RM 0 12 1–RF 2–BH 6 , i POND SEED MI8 9 1 10 ^� � 1–RF (SEE LEGEND) 1–RM ; > � 1 –CM 1–CM 2 SS A –RM 1–RF 1–BH –KC 1–RM v 1–RF ' 0 ° li; C) 2–FB ° O 1 –BH Il�i� O = _ 1–SS 1–RM 1–RF 8–SSD , „ ., 85TH ST NE 1–RF 1–RF LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE PER CITY OF MON ITCELLO CODE QUANTITY KEY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE / ROOT TYPE NOTES OVERSTORY TREES 14 RB River Birch Betula nigra 2.0" cal. B&B StraightTrunk, NoV-Crotch 14 CH Common Hackberry CeItis occidentalis 2.0" cal. B&B Straight Trunk, No V -Crotch 14 KC Kentucky Coffeetree 'Espresso' Gymnocladus dioica 'Espresso -J FS' 2.0'' cal. B&B Straight Trunk, No V -Crotch 15 WB Whitespire Birch Betula populifolia'Whitespire' 2.0" cal. B&B Straight Trunk, NoV-Crotch 15 FM Fall Fiesta Maple Ace rsaccharum'Bal ISta' 2.0" cal. B&B Stra ight Tru n k, NoV-Crotch 16 RM Crimson King Maple Acer pIata noides'Crimson King' 2.0'' cal. B&B StraightTru nk, No V -Crotch 88 TOTAL EVERGREEN TREES 15 BF Swiss Stone Pine jAbies balsamea 8' ht B&B Ful I Form 15 BS Black Hills Spruce Picea glauca densata 8' ht B&B Fu1I Form 30 TOTAL SHRUBS 2 1 FB Fire Ball Euonymus Euonymus alatus'Select' 45 con t. Min.5 canes at ht. spec. PERENNIALS& ORNAMENTAL GRASSES 8 1 SSD Stella Supreme Daylily HemerocalIis'Ste Ila Supreme' 1 gal cont. ADDITIONAL PUD TREES (RED) QUANTITY KEY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE/ROOT TYPE NOTES OVERSTORY TREES 14 RB River Birch 113etula nigra #25 Cont. Clump Straight Trunk, No V -Crotch 14 CH Red Sunset Maple lAcer rubrum'Franksred' #25 Cont. Straight Trunk, No V -Crotch 1 NOTE: TREE STAKING OPTIONAL GUYING PLAN PRUNE DEAD AND BROKEN BRANCHES 16" POLY STRAP 40 MIL. 1-1/2" WIDE 3 -GUY CABLES DOUBLE STRAND 14GA. WIRES AT ONE FLAG PER WIRE 120' SPACING REMOVE ROPE AND BURLAP MULCH - 4" DEEP FROM UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL DOUBLE SHREDDED 18• MACHINE EDGE V -DITCH AROUND MULCH ALL TREES IN SODDED AREAS ROOTBALL MIN. 3 -GUY STAKES AT 120' SPACING PLANTING SOIL 2'X2"X24" WOOD STAKE AT AN ANGLE -III IIIIII- PRUNE DEAD AND BROKEN BRANCHES 4" DEPTH HARDWOOD MULCH OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC PLANTING SOIL, SEE PLANTING NOTES DRAINAGE MOUND III�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII�IIIII SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL IIIIII III NOT TO SCALE 1111111111 1111111111111111 -RF 111 111 _ 1 111 111 PLANTING LEGEND: 1111-1 1111111 I I I-111-111-111-111 I I I I -111-I 11- 111111 111 OVERSTORY TREES I 1 1 1 PREPARE 111 111 111 T 1 111 2" CAL. B&B, SINGLE TRUNK, NO V–CROTCH AREA 3 ES THE WIDTH OF ROOTBALL CONIFEROUS TREES TREE PLANTING DETAIL 8' HT. B&B, FULL FORM 1 NOT TO SCALE POND AREA SEED MIX: MN STATE SEED MIX 33-361 LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND AVOID DAMAGE TO UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. 2. INSTALL 4" MIN. TOP SOIL TO ALL SOD, SEED AND SHRUB AREAS. FINE GRADE ALL SOD AND SEED AREAS. INSTALL 12" PLANTING SOIL TO ALL PERENNIAL AREAS. 3. STAKE OR MARK ALL PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. HAVE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE APPROVE ALL STAKING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4. ALL SHRUB AREAS UNLESS SPECIFIED AS OTHER, TO BE BED MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER FILTER W FABRIC, UNLESS SPECIFIED AS OTHER. POLY–EDGER TO BE VALLEY VIEW BLACK DIAMOND OR APPROVED EQUAL. z 5. INSTALL 4-6" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ROOT SAUCER OF ALL TREES ISOLATED FROM PLANT BEDS. Q 6. PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE 1:1:1 CONSISTING OF 33% SELECT LOAMY TOPSOIL, 33% PEAT MOSS, 33% PIT RUN SAND. z O 7. COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL WORK FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING AT THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS (n PROMPTLY (AS PER DIRECTION OF OWNER). z O 8. ALL MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. W 9. ALL TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH BROWN CREPE TREE WRAP. APPLY WRAP IN NOVEMBER AND REMOVE IN APRIL. 10. MAINTAIN ALL PLANT MATERIALS, INCLUDING WATERING, UNTIL THE TIME OF ACCEPTANCE. 11. COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 12. STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES OPTIONAL: MAINTAIN PLUMBNESS OF TREES FOR DURATION OF WARRANTY PERIOD. 13. SWEEP AND WASH ALL PAVED SURFACES AND REMOVE ALL DEBRIS RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS. 14. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE WRIGHT COUNTY SOIL & EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS FOR DISTURBED AREA STABILIZATION. TREE REQUIREMENTS: 1. PER CHAPTER 4, SECTION 4.1, SUBSECTION C.2.A OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, DECIDUOUS FO &vEj0 ONLY CANOPY OR SHADE TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2.0) CALIPER INCHES IN SIZE AT THE TIME OF PLANTING, AS DETERMINED IN THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. 2. PER CHAPTER 4 SECTION 4.1 SUBSECTION C.2.13OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE �" F O�GONSZ P EVERGREEN CANOPY TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET IN HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL AT THE TIME NOS OF PLANTING. N 3. PER CHAPTER 4, SECTION 4.1, SUBSECTION C.2.I.III OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, WHEN 40 OR MORE TREES ARE REQUIRED ON A SITE, AT LEAST FOUR DIFFERENT SPECIES SHALL BE UTILIZED, IN ROUGHLY EQUAL PROPORTIONS. SPECIES PROVIDED = 8 4. PER CHAPTER 4, SECTION 4.1, SUBSECTION H OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS REQUIRE 4.0 AGGREGATE CALIPER INCHES PER LOT. REQUIRED PLANTINGS ON CORNER LOTS SHALL BE DOUBLE THE LISTED REQUIREMENTS (8.0 ACI OF CANOPY TREES) NON–CORNER LOTS = 54 54 LOTS X 4 CALIPER INCHES = 216 INCHES 0 25 50 100 CORNER LOTS = 5 5 LOTS X 8 CALIPER INCHES = 40 INCHES TOTAL REQUIRED CALIPER INCHES = 256 INCHES SCALE IN FEET CALIPER INCHES PROVIDED = 256 INCHES 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com �W Q V H 0 O W Z z Z O V) O z J O w_ C U G � Q Z LU M I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL LA the laws of the MINNESOTA J a G a a a 5Z G J W cc a 0 z a 'W V V♦ H z z LU a a a O w a W a V W 0 z a � hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed VDSCAPFur14eHITECT State of MARK KRONBECK, PLA Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DN DRAWN: BD PROJECT NO: 219-0117 13 SHEET 13 OF 13 Q J m 0 Nd� �J39b'll0� ozoUeua N0110(1&W9 QIOM MS a az 4;.4 r @3 al $ b � � EB w 8 8g 2 oz ga �z 0 B B ®pp a � � a q !77 -- ` �' - '� -- - V�� _ -_. � ll �� M T`� ��._ j'� � Y . . if 9C".{:i I 3 �, 3 �, FAM m^ �� Pr fly , / aR a I -. _ e ter_, , � `bf� ii ,e i� -'''>, 3 'I, of 13 ` Wednesday, November 11, 2020 11:58:49 AM - Window 2 0 0 (7 z LU M U) 0 00 a a M z �i J 0 IL a LU z z 0 0 M W U) U) W D z LU a Q z LU X 0 wsb October 21, 2020 Mr. Matt Leonard City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Edmonson Ridge Preliminary Plat & Plan — Engineering Review City of Monticello Project No. 2020-029 WSB Project No. R-017007-000 Dear Mr. Leonard: We have reviewed the revised civil plans and preliminary plat dated October 7, 2020 as prepared by Alliant Engineering. The applicant proposes to construct 50 single family lots within 40 acres of land. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Monticello's general engineering and stormwater treatment standards. We offer the following comments regarding engineering and stormwater management matters. Preliminary Plat (Sheet 3) 1. The applicant dedicated an additional 22' of right-of-way adjacent to Edmonson Avenue and 85th Street. The ROW width of Edmonson Avenue (CR 117) will be reviewed by Wright County with plat submittals. 2. Separate trail easement legal descriptions and exhibits should be provided for separate recording with the County. 3. Outlots A and B for the public trails are required to be 30' wide following the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Overall Site Plan (Sheet 4) 4. Include in the legend the various hatching patterns for the proposed hard -cover areas. 5. With final plat submittal provide a removals/demolition plan. 6. Extend trail along 85th Street to Ebersole Avenue to create a looped trail/sidewalk system. 7. Install stop sign at Eakern/87th as well as Eversole/85tH K:\017007-000\Admin\Docs\2020-10-12 Submittal\_2020-10-21 Ltr-m-leonard Weinan PUD & Prelim Plat - WSB Response.do- Edmonson Ridge Preliminary Plat & Plans — Engineering Review October 21, 2020 Page 2 Local City streets are required to have sidewalks along 1 side. Add sidewalk along 86th/Eakern between Edmonson Way. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet 5) The proposed contours along the side -yard swales shows grading towards the building pads in many locations, refine the contouring to provide dedicated side -yard swales. 10. Backyard drainage swales shall have a minimum 2% grade. Correct those that are flatter, including the ditch along Edmonson Avenue, and note percent grade and add directional arrows. 11. The grading between Lot 1 Block 1 and Lot 19 Block 3 appears to be very flat. Review grading and improve proposed grading in this area. 12. With final plat submittal provide the following: a. Provide profile views of the streets with vertical curve design information and proposed grades. Minimum street profile grade shall be no less than 0.5%. b. Provide alignment stationing on the plan view and horizontal curve information. c. Draintile (rigid PVC) will not be required for street subgrade but will be required in locations where sump pumps are proposed to be connected. Include tracer wire and cleanouts every 200 feet. See City detail plate No. 4011 and Appendix D of the City's general specifications. d. Provide profile drawings of the trail. Grading should indicate a cross slope on all walkways. Cross slope shall be a minimum of 1.5% but no more than 2.0%. e. Show mailbox cluster locations on the plans. f. Note approximate driveway percent grades. SWPPP & Details (Sheet 6-8) 13. A NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 14. A detailed review of the SWPPP will be conducted with final plat/construction plan review. Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Utility Plan (Sheet 9) General 15. The building department will review the hydrant location/spacing and emergency vehicle access/circulation and provide comments separately from this letter. K:\017007-000Wdmin\Docs\2020-10-12 Submittal\_2020-10-21 Ltr-m-leonard Weinan PUD & Prelim Plat - WSB Response.do- Edmonson Ridge Preliminary Plat & Plans — Engineering Review October 21, 2020 Page 3 16. With final construction plans, provide confirmation of of MDH (watermain) and MPCA (sanitary sewer) plan review and permitting. 17. Reference that plans should comply with the requirements in the City General Specifications on the Cover Sheet. 18. Show/note drainage and utility easements. Sanitary Sewer/watermain 19. Provide dimension note for 10 -foot separation between the watermain and sanitary sewer. Add a dimension note(s) on the plan view. 20. Identify tracer wire for the watermain. 21. If applicable, the sanitary sewer risers shall be placed at the property line and not at the main. 22. Connections to existing watermain shall be made using a new gate valve, show the symbol in the correct location on the plan. 23. Sanitary sewer inverts do not appear to match asbuilt plans, review and correct. 24. With final plat submittal provide the following: a. Provide profile view of watermain and sanitary sewer and label pipe type, strength class, and percent grade. b. Private utility conduit crossings shall be shown for the joint trench. Add Detail 7002 to details sheet. The location of the City's Fibernet conduits also need to be added to the plans. c. Power lines along Edmonson Avenue and 85th Street will be required to be buried with the project. d. Clearly show the construction limits on the pertinent sheets. e. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. f. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. g. Provide a street lighting plan. Show streetlights on utility plan. h. Provide sewer stub invert elevations for each lot. i. Where sanitary or storm sewer cross the watermain, note "Maintain 18 -Inch Separation, 4" Rigid Insulation". K:\017007-000Wdmin\Docs\2020-10-12 Submittal\_2020-10-21 Ltr-m-leonard Weinan PUD & Prelim Plat - WSB Response.do- Edmonson Ridge Preliminary Plat & Plans — Engineering Review October 21, 2020 Page 4 Storm Sewer Plan (Sheet 101 25. The city design manual indicates the minimum storm sewer pipe diameter is 15 inches. Please revise segment CB203 to CBMH2O2. 26. The last structure in the street prior to discharging to the infiltration basins should have a 4 -foot deep sump, according to the City Design Manual. 27. Catch basins should have a minimum depth of four feet to prevent freezing. Please review system and revise accordingly. 28. Provide capacity value on the Storm Sewer Schedule for each pipe segment. 29. All FES 24 inches in diameter and greater should include sheet piling as per the City detail. 30. It appears there is a low point proposed at CB 111, but no catch basin is provided on the other side of the street, review and confirm low point location. 31. On the storm sewer schedule, the pipe slope is listed with unit of "W', but it appears this should be "ft/ft" based on the values shown. 32. With final plat submittal provide the following: a. Profile views of the proposed storm sewer with the street profile sheets and label pipe type, strength class, and percent grade. b. Note the quantity and class of rip -rap at each location. Provide a general note that all rip -rap; shall be grouted per City Standard Specifications. Standard Details Plan (Sheet 11) 33. Include typical section/insets for proposed ponding/infiltration basins. 34. Add specific details for the control structures. Stormwater Management 35. Provide HydroCAD modeling for the 10 -day snowmelt condition as identified in the City's Design Manual. 36. Demonstrate that drainage from subwatershed PR -2 will drain to Infiltration Basin 2 and not the ditch along 85th ST. 37. Post development peak runoff rates are met for the 2 -yr, 10 -yr, and 100 -yr storm events through the use of onsite ponding. 38. Volume control is met onsite through 2 infiltration basins. The total impervious amount of 347,093 requires a retention volume of 31,817 cf. The Basin 1 provides 30,008 cf and Basin 2 provides 48,603 cf of storage. The combined volume is in excess of the required amount. K:\017007-000Wdmin\Docs\2020-10-12 Submittal\_2020-10-21 Ltr-m-leonard Weinan PUD & Prelim Plat - WSB Response.do- Edmonson Ridge Preliminary Plat & Plans — Engineering Review October 21, 2020 Page 5 39. The infiltration volume is required to drawdown in 48 hrs. The applicant is assuming an infiltration rate of 0.8 in/hr. Basin 1 has an infiltration depth of 1 foot and Basin 2 has an infiltration depth of 4.5 feet. The maximum infiltration depth that will draw down within 48 hours is 3.2 feet according to the assumed infiltration rate. Please revise the infiltration depth for Basin 2. Additionally, the soil boring information in the location of Basin 2 indicates clay type soils. 40. Geotechnical information can be used for preliminary design purposes; however, infiltration testing of the constructed systems will be required to confirm drawdown. 41. Soils that have infiltration rates greater than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. 42. Conservation easements and posts should be placed over infiltration basins, following the City's Design Manual. Wetland & Environmental 43. The applicant has indicated that there are no wetlands onsite. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Sincerely, WSB L James L. Stremel, PE Senior Project Manager K:\017007-000\Admin\Docs\2020-10-12 Submittal\_2020-10-21 Ltr-m-leonard Weinan PUD & Prelim Plat - WSB Response.do- JNT Y OA � z = m November 12, 2020 O Mathew Leonard X855 Monticello City Engineer 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Wright County Highway Department RE: REVISED Preliminary Plan Review — Edmonson Ridge 3600 Braddock Ave NE Plat No. 20.10 Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph: (763)682-7383 Dear Mr. Leonard, Fax: (763)682-7313 Per our conference call on November 5, 2020. Wright County is issuing this revised preliminary VIRGIL HAWKINS, P.E. plat review letter for the proposed Edmonson Ridge development along CR 117. Highway Engineer CHAD HAUSMANN, P.E. 1) It is our understanding that no access to CR 117 is requested as part of this plat. Assistant Highway Engr. 2) STEVE MEYER Si�ay five (65) feet of right of way shall be dedioated as Pat4 of the projeet with the Maintenance shifted to the atAe., est edge of the doth,,.. .. right „vay. Superintendent a. Revised — Fifty -five (55) feet of dedicated right of way is acceptable. It is JEREMY CARLSON, P.L.S. consistent with development to the north; however, it does limit design Right -of -Way Agent options in the future. SARA BUERMANN, P.E. b. Addition - Wright County's Long -Range Transportation Plan will be Traffic Engineer amended to show CR 117 as a future turn back to the City of Monticello. c. Addition - Right of way should be dedicated at the corner of CR 117 and 851h St NE to accommodate the footprint of a single lane roundabout. 3) Any proposed work within the CR 117 right of way will require a Right of Way permit. 4) No increase to the peak runoff to the CR 117 right of way should result from this development project. Please provide a copy of the final drainage analysis. Please contact us at 763-682-7383 if you have any questions or need further clarification. Sincerely, Scwal C 3 ue4-nww/vv Sara Buermann, PE Traffic Engineer Cc: Virgil Hawkins, County Engineer Chad Hausmann, Assistant County Engineer Ryan Melhouse, City of Monticello Engineering Dave Nash, Alliant Engineering, Inc. Steve Jobe, County Surveyor Eric Stennes, Assistant County Surveyor An Equal Opportunity Employer Jacob Thunander From: Joey Herbst <joeyherbst@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 6:13 PM To: Community Development Subject: Re: 8617 Edmonson Ave NE Hello I wanted to place my opinion on the choice to what happens to this property. We live at 8522 Ebersole and the view is incredible and we ( and our neighbors ) love this neighborhood. We dont want to see it become crowded and noisy since that is why we moved out here in the first place. We have talked about this and think that this would also devalue the value of the properties that we own along this area. Thank you for your time! On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:49 PM Community Development <Community.Developmentgci.monticello.mn.us> wrote: Joey, I see your response, but your original first message is in white text. Can you please re -send me a new email so that we can include that in the Planning Commission report? Thank you, Jacob Thunander Community and Economic Development Coordinator City of Monticello www.ci.monticello.mn.us 763-271-3206 Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government office is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and may be disclosed to third parties. ORDINANCE NO. 750 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE EDMONSON RIDGE PUD DISTRICT AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO THE EDMONSON RIDGE PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: 14 (XX) Edmonson RPUD Districil (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Edmonson Ridge PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the ct for resitial land uses. Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Edmonson Ridge PUD District shall be single family residential uses as found in the TN, Traditional Neighborhood District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2020, as may be ISamend 14 O� (c) Accessory ccessory uses shall be those listed in the TN, Traditityl Neig borhood District, and as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans, and as specifically regulated by ,Lrestrictive covenant as recorded against the lots zoned Edmonson Ridge PUD District. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Edmonson Ridge PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the TN, Traditional Neighborhood District shall apply. (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an ORDINANCE NO. 750 amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (P)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels to Edmonson Ridge PUD, Planned Unit Development District: Lots 1-12, Block 1, Lots 1-28, Block 2, Lots 1-19, Block 3, and Outlot A, all in Edmonson Ridge. 140 Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to r�ilake the chan es required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renu4ering process, provided that such changes tain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publicatiom.Mike ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website afte licatiOn. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online a t Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this �ay of , 2020. ATTES' Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor 2 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, November 2nd, 2020 - 6:15 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Sam Murdoff, Paul Konsor, and Andrew Tapper Commissioners Absent: John Alstad and Alison Zimpfer Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Ron Hackenmueller, and Scott Ruhland (Lakota Group) 1. General Business A. Call to Order Sam Murdoff called the Regular Meetin of the Lcello Planning Commission to order at 6:15 p.m. B. Consideration of approvin2liNtes a. Regular Meeting Minutes — Octobt 5th 2020 PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO APPROVE THE RE AR MEETING MINUTES — OCTOBER, 5TH, 2020. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MO ION. MOVIED, CARRIED, 3-0. C. Citizen Comments None.. ,I D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda N/A A E. Consideration to approve agenda ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS IT STANDS. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. 2. Public earings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to "Places to Live", Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary and Final Plat for a 54 lot detached single-family subdivision Applicant: Shawn Weinand/LSW Investments, LLC Steve Grittman reviewed the land use application request and provided the location of the proposed residential development. He noted that it is a 20 acre parcel that is located at the intersection at 85th Street North East and Edmonson Avenue and adjacent to the Featherstone development. The proposed plan would connect by streets with Featherstone with access only provided by interior streets. Grittman provided a site plan and noted that the lots were proposed to be single family residential, but would require a Planned Unit Development as it varies from the standard Monticello Zoning Code. The report uses the T -N (Traditional Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 1 114 Neighborhood Residence) District as a baseline, but the report also references the R-1 (Single Family Residence) District and R-2 (Single and Two -Family Residence) District zoning standards to understand how this proposal fits in the context of what our current zoning might require and also seeing how the applicant is seeking PUD flexibility from base standards. The median lot size is 10,600 square feet, which is smaller lots than the R-1, but slightly larger than the T -N. The project is slightly denser than Featherstone, but the City still considers the proposal to be low density. The proposal indicates a range of lot sizes from 6,800 square feet to 30,000 square feet. It was noted that the larger lots would be encumbered by drainag onds. Grittman noted the review requirement fo Grittman also noted that the proposal included a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "Urban Reserve" to "Places to Live". He stated that also on the agenda was an item to consider adoption of an updated Comprehensive Plan. The draft plan guides the land as "Mixed Neighborhood". A mixed neighborhood would include single family as well as some rafito high density attached housing. Grittman noted that the proposed plat and PUDWould not be in conflict with the proposed Comprehensive Plan. He also added that the PUD aspect is met in at least one way by providing an alternative housing design not commonly seen in the community. I Grittman provided a review of the staff report and kibit Z comments, including those related to driveway design, parking availability and landscaping recommendations. Staff recommended approval of the land use application. b&j Rk Sam Murdoff asked if Featherstone is'a PUD. Grittman confirmed and stated that it was created that way primarily because the larger Featherstone project anticipated a mix of housing and.commercial development in the area. The R-1 standards are used for the current single-family Featherstone development and one of the standards have been flexed. Murdoff was concerned about having the evelopment without any major road outlet. Grittman demonstrated access to the site and noted that people could get to the collector system fairly quickly without having to wind very far through the Featherstone neighborhood. Murdoff asked if the Featherstone development was designed to handle additional traffic with a development of this parcel. Grittman confirmed that the access points in Featherstone -were specifically designed to allow access to the proposed property development. The designation for the proposed development parcel was not made prior to the platting of Featherstone, but Grittman thought that it was generally an expectation that this property would develop as residential, but the density was not determined by the Comprehensive Plan or at the time of the Featherstone project. Grittman thought that there would not be an undue burden on the roadways on Featherstone. Murdoff asked for an estimate on projected vehicle trips on the roadway. Grittman suggested less than a total of 400 trips including the existing and that traffic would likely distribute evenly north and west. Angela Schumann also noted that because 85th Street and Edmonson Avenue are considered collector routes, the access spacing would be problematic to include Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 2 114 additional access to either collector road. It was noted that there has been some discussion of a future roundabout at 85th Street and Edmonson Avenue and that the proposed development would accommodate such improvement if desired. Paul Konsor asked what is proposed for Block 3, Lot 19. Grittman noted that it is a different house design than what is seen for most of the proposed development. Grittman assumed a three -stall garage with a larger structure. Elevations were shown to the commission. Konsor asked for clarification on the number of proposed garage stalls per lot as there were discrepancies between the applicant's submittal and the staff report. Grittman noted that it was not known from the plans submitted and that the Exhibit Z conditions would require clarification. Grittman noted that the issue for staff is that most h the driveways appear to be narrow and appear to be drawn to the wrong side of the structure on the plat. Staff presume that there are more two stall garages than the applicant was planning, but clarification was needed. Murdoff wondered if this information was typically required to be cleared up in advance of the meeting. If the Planning Commission made a recommendation on the decisions for the application, the application would not be further considered by the board, presuming the applicant can meet the conditions assigned to the proposal. Grittman noted that it was not necessary to have that information to move the plat forward, but that it would need to be clarified as there is enough room to do it. Grittman explained that the final layout for each unit design may change after approval of the Preliminary Plat, as often times developers build as requested. Some property owners may have different needs for garage stall spaces. However, Grittman noted that the standards would need to be figured out in advance so that we are not dating utility or parking along streets problems. Judgements can be mads development is constructed. Sam Mu11f opend4he public hearing and invited the applicant to speak first. Grittman quickly added tflat one additpnal item was to be added to the conditions, requiring that this approval is conditional upon approval of the annexation. Shawn Weinand, the applt, asked staff to show all of the drawings of the architecture. He noted that there are four different styles of homes. Weinand noted that they tried to create a similar exterior so that it would create a neighborhood feel, but also have flexibility so that there was different floorplans and variety of buyers. Homes would range from a two to six bedroom home. Weinand explained that what made this project unique was the architecture and that he wanted to have a similar feeling as in Autumn Ridge Villas. He explained that they are trying to create a single family home that is on a little smaller of a lot, with a bigger driveway, and public streets. Weinand noted that it was unknown at this time what lots would accommodate which size garage. He noted that a majority of two stall garages would be located in the center due to the size of the lots. The perimeter of the project would be primarily three stall garage. He noted that they have found out through the Autumn Ridge project that people prefer a larger garage. The houses range on main level from 1,500 square feet to 2,100 square feet. The applicant requested a minimum finished square footage of 1,250 square feet to allow flexibility by the buyers. The lots would run an estimated $45,000 Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 3 114 more than Autumn Ridge. Weinand noted they are trying to develop a unique, step-up housing and sell out within five years. Weinand noted that they are making all changes or saw no issues with the concerns of staff. He noted that ample driveway and public street parking would be provided. Weinand noted that he would like to request that the minimum square footage of the garages be set at 440 square feet rather than 450 square feet due to dimensional issues. He expected that very few of the garages would be less the 24 feet in width. He noted that the development would more than compliment neighboring development. He added that each house would be landscaped. An association would be formed, but would not manage the lawn or snow removal of the driveway. Covenants would be set in place to help keep a clean neighborhood. A mix of ages was envisioned for this neighborhood. Weinand noted he had copies of thekhanges proposed by staff. Weinand noted on proposed Lot 4, 5, and 6 Block 3 a drain pipe and easement existed causing the shape of the lot to be as noted. He would work with his development team on alternatives, but welcomed staff commendation. Murdoff asked what zoning dithe developer would like to utilize as a base for the PUD flexibility. Weinand that he was seeking a PUD to create a feeling of a controlle eighborhoo with some continuity and some architectural control. 'V Paul Konsor asked for clarification on any homeowner's association. Weinand noted that there would be an association only to control the architecture and the covenants, but generally not for maintenance. If a monument sign was constructed, an association would be minimal to maintain. Weinand confirmed there would be an official homeowner's association to control the covenants. Konsor also asked if the applicant would like to amend his application to include an adjustment to the minimum garage square footage. Weinand noted that he didn't see that condition until today and as part of the PUD he requested that it be changed to 440 square feet. Konsor noted a concern with the clashing of step-up ousing with a smaller garage square footage. Weinand noted that he actually had 0 square feet on plans he submitted. Murdoff asked for clarification on lot sizes for the proposed development. Tapper noted that the numbers would shift because of the shifting of outlots, but that the median lot size would not change much. Tapper asked if most of the large lots included the drainage ponds. Grittman confirmed. Weinand asked staff if the zoning they were comparing it to was 7,500 square feet for lot size. Grittman confirmed it was 7,500 square feet in the T -N and there are only a couple below that number. Tapper asked for a neighborhood that was comparable to a T -N District. Grittman noted the entry portion of Carlisle Village from Country Road are similar to the T -N size. Sunset Ponds also has T -N similar properties. Charlotte Gabler asked about park dedication. Schumann explained that the overall park dedication recommendation would come from the Parks, Arts, and Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 4 114 Recreation Commission on November 10. She noted that staff look at the half mile spacing requirement for parks and noted the proximity to a linear park found at Featherstone. In addition, staff comments regarding the sidewalks was to ensure good connections especially to the Featherstone development and that park. Finally as part of the park dedication requirement, the applicant is proposing two, ten foot bituminous pathways along Edmonson Avenue and 85th Street. Gabler asked for clarification on park design envisioned in Featherstone. Schumann noted that a tot lot/playground has already been constructed. She noted that an amenity that is often requested is natural pathways and they would be incorporated into the park while also incorporating stormwater ponds and views in this area. 1&& Murdoff asked if the developer looked at a different plat configuration. Weinand noted that the design proposed was the rost efficient, best flow, and use of property. Tapper noted that curved streets also serves as a traffic calming measure. Weinand also added that they were working with two existing streets and had to follow drainage of streets. The contour of the two surrounding neighborhoods also needed to be followed. Sewer and water were also stubbed in from those streets. 4 Murdoff asked the applicant for more information on the fimshab square footage of space exceptions they were proposing. Weinand noted that that finishable square footage of space for the two or three stall garages were very similar. The base square footage is 1,650 square feet, but they want flexibility on this request. The 3 or 4 level split, is about 1,540 squoe feet with potential for an additional 600 to 1,000 square feet to finish off. If a finished basement was added to the two or three stall garages, it was estimated that 3,200 to 3,600 square feet of finished square feet. On the 2 story with tuck under garage, it was estimated at 2,200 square feet with expansion of an office or loft area that could go up to 2,500 square feet. There would be plenty of expansion room if desired. He also explained that these homes provided steep roof pitches. Weinand noted the importance of bringing step-up housing to the community and the importance of having higher lot and home prices in the community. Schumann clarified the T -N and R-1 district standards for finished and finishable square footage. She asked if Murdoff was looking for how many lots would meet or exceed the finishable square footage of 2,000 square feet or better. Weinand noted that if they have a crawl space, they might have something that is not finishable of more than 1,250, but that would be rare. He was asking for flexibility in the PUD for this section of the code to bz-flexible to the market demand. Schumann noted the importance of looking at the grading plan and the building design standards on that grading plan for look out or walk out homes. Weinand encouraged the Planning Commission to see how Autumn Ridge Villas is developing. Neil Mccarty, 4462 87th Street NE, noted concerns of the proposed new development especially as it relates to increased traffic in the Featherstone subdivision and why additional access points couldn't directly serve the proposed neighborhood. Mccarty also had questions regarding enforcement of covenants. Murdoff responded that the proposed development would have an association that would enforce covenants. Ron Hackenmueller noted that there is the zoning Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 5 114 ordinance that is enforced by the City and the covenants are enforced by the developer. Angela Schumann noted that Edmonson Avenue on the east portion of this development is a County right of way and that they have control on access management. She added that there are access spacing guidelines in place for both 85th and Edmonson. Schumann noted spacing would be difficult and subject to review by the City Engineer, who did not comment on an access issues in their comment letter. Grittman noted that the typical County road spacing is a quarter mile, but sometime is down to an 1/8 of a mile (660 feet). The distance between 85th and 87th Street is 1,100 feet, but that you could not have an access that would maintain a road at 660 feet from both streets. Mccarty also suggested that the Commission have ?he most complete and any revised information about the development prior to making any decisions. Schumann noted the application's for which the public hearing was held and the planning process. She mentioned that the City Council would review any recommendation for approval of the discussed land use application. If approved by City Council, the applicant would be required to file for Final Plat and Final Stage Planned Unit Development which is also subject to approval of the City Council. 4 1 Schumann noted that one additional comment letter was submitted from a property owner in the Featherstone development. That letter was included in the agenda packet. Schumann summarized concerns of density and property value. Hearing comments, the public hearing was4losed. Murdoff echoed concerns and wanted clarification on driveway size, minimum finishable and finished square feet, and size of house on lot. Tapper responded that the developer indicated he is not sure what the future holds and a buyer will want. Tapper asked the developer if these homes would be built on specification. Weinand declined, but noted a certain amount of specification is used. Murdoff suggested minimum standards for lot size categories. Gabler explained that the PUD would utilize the base zoning standards of the R -I and T -N. Murdoff indicated that he wasn't comfortable not knowing which zoning designation standards to utilize for the development. Grittman explained that a PUD has to stand on its own and that staff present comparable districts to understand what the contexut that we are not granting variances to the R- I or T -N District. The City wou view this project as a standalone project with its own zoning district. The Planning -Commission role is to understand if the project does a better job of meeting the City's development goals than a standard zoning district would. Grittman noted that zoning districts can be useful comparatives and put projects into context, but not the standard that is applied to a PUD. Grittman reiterated staff's recommendation of approval and felt that it meets the development goals set forth by the City. Konsor asked if there are still guidelines that would be followed under the PUD, such as setbacks. Grittman confirmed there are functional guidelines. Grittman further responded to the question of knowing whether each lot would be up to the standard that the City is trying to achieve. We are trying to identify what the minimum standard that we expect the applicant to achieve and be comfortable with. It would be assumed that the market would also Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 6 114 play a role so that someone that pays more for a lot is going to put a larger home on it. It was acknowledged by Grittman that this is not always the case. Schumann added that the elevations that the applicant included are the standard. The elevations including the types of materials, the amount of materials, orientation of materials, the breakup of the facades, quality of the materials, and the number of materials that provide visual interest are used as a guidebook. Decision 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-029, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE GUIDED USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "URBAN RESERVE" TO "PLACES TO LIVE", BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS INCORPORATED IN EXHIBIT Z WITH THE ADDITION OF THE CONTIGENCY OF ANNEXATION AND THE GARAGE SPACE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 440 SQUARE FEET. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 2-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF VOTING IN OPPOSITION. � Decision 2. ANDREW TAPPER RECOMMENDING AP TO PUD, PLANNED UN FINDINGS NOTFjQ IN Tl THE MOTION. N&ION OPPOSITION. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-030, OF REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 3LOPMENT DISTRICT, BASED ON THE OLUTION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED ED, 2-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF VOTING IN Decision 3. Preliminary Plat ANDREW TAPPER MOVED OPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-031, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DMONSON RIDGE, BASED ON THE FINDINGS NOTED IN THE OLUTION AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS INCORPORATED IN IBIT Z WITH THE ADDITION OF THE CONTIGENCY OF ANNEXATION'AND THE GARAGE SPACE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 440 SQUARE FEET. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 2-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF VOTING IN OPPOSITION. Decision 4. Development Stage PUD ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-032, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR EDMONSON RIDGE, BASED ON THE FINDINGS NOTED IN THE RESOLUTION AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS INCORPORATED IN EXHIBIT Z WITH THE ADDITION OF THE CONTIGENCY OF ANNEXATION AND THE GARAGE SPACE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 440 SQUARE FEET. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 7 114 MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 2-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF VOTING IN OPPOSITION. EXHIBIT Z Comprehensive Plan Amendment to "Places to Live", Rezoning to PUD, Development Stage PUD, and Preliminary Plat for Edmonson Ridge Legal Description (lengthy): The South 933 feet of the East 933 feet of the Northwest Quarter both measured at right angles thereof Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The approval of the Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD is subject to approval of the requested Annexation, rezoning and applicable Comprehensive Plan amendment, and the annexation is processed by the Office of Administrative Hearings per the MOAA. A sidewalk is built along 86th Street NE connecting to the proposed sidewalk connection from Edmonson Way. The private trail in the middle of Block will be removed. S� Applicant will provide drawings'' entifying widths and design at correspond to house styles and elevations. 7111 Applicant shall provide unit floor plans to IR space as part of the Final Stage PUD review. L, V, attached garages and living The connecting trails to the external collector roads wime platted to 30' in width. The applicant may choose to plat just one such outlot in the southeast corner of the plat to provide convenient pedestrian acce*to the regional pathway system. 7.infiltration basins will be deeded to City as a drainage and utility easement with nservation easement signs installed. 8. The infiltration basins shall have access for maintenance consistent with the recommendations of the City Engineer. Ivik 9. The development is subject to the requirements of the City Engineer, per the letter dated October 21, 2020 10. Landscape treatments are added to delineate the private and public boundaries along the infiltration basin areas. 11. Landscape treatments are added at the perimeter of the platted area adjacent to the rear yards and collector roadways to create a buffer and increase rear yard privacy for residents. 12. The applicant enters into a development agreement as a condition of Final Plat and Final PUD approval. Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 8 114 13. The minimum garage size for all units shall be set at 440 square feet. 14. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. B. Consideration of an Interim Use Permit for Monticello Public Works for Public Warehousing, Temporary Applicant: City of Monticello Steve Grittman explained the request for Interim Use Permit by the City of Monticello. He reminded the Commission that the Zoning Ordinance was recently amended to add public temporary storage as a secondary use of property and was allowed with an Interim Use Permit in the B-3, or I-2 districts. This would allow the City of Monticello Public Works to haSa location for temporary storage until they can accommodate storage space through new construction or otherwise. The proposal is for storage to occur at the Custom Canopy site along Edmonson Avenue, zoned B-3 (Highway Business). Grittman highlighted the building that is being considered to being used for the storage. The City would use the building for seasonal equipment storage, but could be utilized for other storage uses. They anticipate a relatively low volume of traffic coming and going from this site and would comply with the terms of the permit/ordinance. Following the comple 'on of the IUP, the property would return to its typical B-3 uses. Staff recommended approval of the application with conditions identified in Exhibit Z. Grittman noted at the previous Planning Commission meeting there was concerns of the types of storage especially hazardous materials and if it would raise concerns for surrounding properties. Staff specifically added Item 3 of Exhibit Z to addresthose concerns. Grittman noted that some of the materials may be classified as hazardous materials by the PCA, but there are storage handling requirements for that material. lqr Sam Murdoff opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. PAUL KONSOR MOVED 10 ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-033, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR PUBLIC WAREHOUSING, TEMPORARY, IN THE WESTERN -MOST BUILDING AT 1305 EDMONSON AVE. NE, FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED 5 YEARS, OR WHEN THE LEASE FOR SUCH STORAGE TERMINATES, WHICHEVER IS SOONER. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. EXHIBIT Z Interim Use Permit for Public Warehousing, Temporary 1305 Edmonson Ave. NE PID 155500142401 The term of the Interim Use Permit shall be five years from the date of City Council approval, or upon termination of the City's lease for the property, whichever is sooner. Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 9 114 2. The Interim Use Permit grants no additional rights to use the property for leased warehousing/storage beyond the applicable zoning regulations for the property. 3. The City/tenant shall at all times maintain stored materials and equipment in accordance with all applicable zoning, building, and fire codes, including the provisions of the zoning ordinance authorizing the Interim Use Permit. 4. Comments and recommendations of other staff. C. Consideration of a Request for Adoption of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan Applicant: City of Monticello Angela Schumann introduced the item for recommendation of adoption of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. JThe Planning Commission is asked to consider comments that were received prior to the public hearing including those in the packet and those comments received during the meeting. Schumann noted that the Comprehensive Plan is the City's long range plan and the blueprint for how it will grow ovehhe next twenty years. The need to update the City's Comprehensive Plan was amplified by changes throughout the community itself as well broader land use patterns occurring across the nation. Changes in technology, commercial real estate, the impacts of the pandemic, how we move goods and services, and how we transition from energy based economy and tax base were considered when developing the draft plan. Schumann stressed the amount of stakeholders that were engaged with the plan from the start. Schumann introduced Scott Ruhland from the Lakota Group to provide information on the planning process. 00116Riihhand, the Lakota Group, introduced himself and noted that the plan pro s taken 15 months to develop the updated draft Comprehensive Plan. He noted that the consultant and City have been able to stay on schedule even with the pande ic. The consultants confirmed that they were able to gather a lot feedback fr he community on the plan. Ruhland noted that the project was broken into two phases: visioning and comprehensive plan update. He noted that the consultants wanted to get a feel for the community and to understand what direction the community wanted to go as far as the improvement and development of Monticello over the next twenty years. Community engagement was provided multiple days and in-person and virtual/online opportunities. Ruhland reviewed the approved vision statement, community value statements, and preferred growth scenario with the Commission. Ruhland highlighted extensive community engagement opportunities throughout phase two: comprehensive plan update. Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 10 114 He explained the foundation of the plan is the land use chapter and provided the big picture items that came out of the land use strategies and vision. Ruhland noted that the three themes of the plan are community health, sustainability, and sense of place. Ruhland provided key highlights from each of the proposed draft chapters. Each chapter will have goals, policies, and strategies to achieve the comprehensive plan vision. These will all be included under an implementation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Andrew Tapper noted that he also serves on the IEDC and they recently discussed the completion of a new hotel and hospitality stud He asked where a hotel fits in with the land use classifications. Ruhland noted that the Comprehensive Plan designations are looked at from a high level and the zoning will allow specific uses. The updated Comprehensive Plan give ideas of the types of uses that should locate in the land use categories that have been developed. Ruhland noted for hotels the Comprehensive Plan would be ideal in Regional Commercial, Employment Campus, and Commercial Residential Flex. It was noted that once adopted, the Zoning Ordinance would need tocleaned up to make it consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Ruhland also po ed out in the implementation chapter it includes the la se designations with the corresponding zoning district. Sam Murdoff opened up the public hearing. 1+4 Mike ScOleider, 453 135th Avenue, Foley, explained that he was concerned with property he owns that is between East Broadway and I-94, across from Meadow Oak Drive. He noted that the colors of the land use designations were difficult to tell without a large map. He felt that the designation for Employment Campus for his property does not fit, and felt that a Community Residential Flex would be a N tter fit. He noted the surrounding residential to the parcel and that the ployment Campus seemed too industrial for the area. He noted that the City s been concerned about residential along the interstate, but noted land along f Course Road and near the interstate on the east side of town was designated tial and felt it was a similar parcel to his own. Discussion regarding that particular parcel occurred. Gabler asked if moving that designation to the Commercial and Residential Flex was a better designation and allowed for more discussion. Tapper also asked if determining a designation would discourage people from developing it for a different use. Schumann noted that staff would convey how the parcel was designated and it's intended use, but that a comprehensive plan amendment could always be applied for. Staff agreed that this parcel was difficult to identify a particular designation. Ruhland understood the conflict with the land Schneider noted on the east parcel adjacent to the interstate and being designated residential. Grittman noted concerns with Schneider's parcel being residential and noted a change to the designation to the Commercial and Residential Flex would be more difficult to deny a project that is residential even if it's not a good fit for the parcel. He noted leaving the parcel as Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 11 1 14 Employment Campus gave the City more discretion on the development of that parcel. Schneider indicated that he has owned the land for 15 years and that the economy continues to change. He noted that the flex district would allow some flexibility and felt that having it designated as employment campus would further dissuade people in developing the parcel. He understood the ability to later apply for a Comprehensive Plan update, but noted that the time to make changes would be prior to adoption of the plan rather than amending the new plan. Through the Commercial Residential Flex, it was noted that a Planned Unit Development would be required and allow the City more discretion. 1 PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE ADOPTION OF THE MONTICELLO 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BASED ON FINDINGS IN RESOLUTION PC -2020-034, SUBJECT TO THOSE COMMENTS OR REVISIONS AS STATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE VN. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. 3. Regular Agenda � 1^ A. Consideration of a reauest for a Simple Subdii Combination in a R-1 (Single Family Residence) District to enable a lot line adjustment for public stormwater improvements Applicant: City of Monticello Steve Grittman provided an overview of the item ab*rovided the location of the land use request. Grittman indicated that the proposal is to shift the subdivision line just east of the church's parking lot so that the (expandable) stormwater pond and lift station could be on a single parcel. Grittman provided the recommended proposed adjustment. Grittman noted that the site meets the conditions in the code and that an exception to the platting requirement exists that would accommodate the simple subdivision and lot combination. It is also consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the subdi n is to improve City utility and stormwater management in that region. Staff recommended approval with conditions as displayed in Exhibit Z. F Sam Mur ff asked why the City is having to improve stormwater management in that area. Charlotte Gabler indicated that the pond was incorrectly built from twenty plus years ago. She indicated that a trail easement would also be gained along that area along County Road 39. Murdoff asked if part of the issue due to the development of the senior housing project. Gabler indicated that this is something that has been in the works for the past 1.5 years and that calculations were wrong. Flooding issues predated the development of the senior housing facility. Murdoff thought that part of the senior housing design was that it could pump water to that stormwater pond. Grittman noted that the senior housing project has to retain its own stormwater, but eventually it would go that direction. There is no increase in that pond from the senior housing project. Angela Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 12 114 Schumann added that stormwater management is individual to each developed site. Murdoff raised concerns with why the City would want to change the lot line and ownership to include the existing stormwater pond. Grittman noted that the area is in the City's easement and that the pond is the City's. Rather than expanding the easement, it makes more sense that the City has fee title to its facilities. Schumann added that it is a policy decision that has recently been made that in many cases rather than just drainage and utility easements, developers are asked to put regional ponds in outlots so that they become the property of the City, as the City has to maintain the overall regional stormwater, tem. Paul Konsor asked if the current owners have to sell or convey the land to the City. Grittman noted that the property owners are co -applicants and that they would convey that part of the parcel to the City. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO T RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-35, RECOMMENDING APPRO F THE SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND LOT COMBINATION FOR THE SU CT PARS S, CONTINGENT ON THE REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED . ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THEASMOTIO IED, 3-0. IT Z Simple Subdivision and tot Comb 'on 300 Riverview Drive jrPIDs155500182202 and 155500201 1. Conveya f Par B to the City upon approval and recording of the ivision. IL it Concu ecording of Lot Combination and incorporated easements as proposed. 3. omments and recommen ions of other Staff. B. Consideration of the Communitv DevelODment Director's Report Angela Schumann added more information about stormwater management. She noted thaMhe City is part of a group paying close attention to County owned, Ditch 33. Sht-explained that the ditch manages County stormwater, but impacts the development potential in the city, especially on the east side of town. She encouraged the Commission to watch the discussions happening at the County, Township, and City level regarding Ditch 33. Schumann provided the Community Development Director's Report as included in the packet. 4. Added Items None. Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 13 114 5. Adjournment SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:34 P.M. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander Approved: December 1st, 2020 Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 14 114 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 4B. Consideration of a Request for Adoption of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to consider adoption of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. As part of its review, the Council is also asked to consider the comments of the public received prior to and during the required public hearing for the Comprehensive Plan. A Comprehensive Plan is the city's guide for growth and development. A Comprehensive Plan should be reflective of the community's vision and articulate goals for how Monticello will progress over time. Generally, cities update their plans approximately every ten years, to better address changes which may impact future growth. Even with a ten-year update timeline, most Comprehensive Plans purposely look out over a long-range planning horizon, most often twenty years. This long-range span allows a city the opportunity to think in the broadest terms about its future. Monticello last updated its Comprehensive Plan in the period between 2006-2008. In Monticello's case, the need to update the Comprehensive Plan was amplified by significant changes on the horizon, which include major transportation and utility infrastructure improvements, tax base and land use transitions as related to the nuclear power plant, and land use questions related to the changing nature of development patterns. The City of Monticello authorized an update to the Comprehensive Plan in June of 2019. The process for updating the plan, known as Monticello 2040, was designed as a two-step planning process. The first step was to thoroughly engage the community in developing a Community Vision. Throughout the second half of 2019, using a variety of platforms and tools, a vision for the future of the community took shape. The visioning process fleshed out ideas and issues residents and stakeholders identified as those that will shape the community over the next 20 years. The community then worked through scenarios to capitalize on the opportunities and address the challenges. The visioning process concluded with a final vision statement, a set of guiding value statements, and a preferred growth scenario. The Vision phase was highly participatory and future -forward. The City adopted the Monticello 2040 Community Vision in February of 2020. After completion of the Visioning component, the groundwork was set for developing the Comprehensive Plan. The Monticello 2040 Plan uses the vision, values, and preferred growth scenario as the platform to guide land use, transportation, community facilities, parks and open space, and other community elements over the next 20 years. The Plan lays out these physical characteristics of growth, as well as the Goals, Policies, and Strategies required to accomplish the Community Vision. City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 The draft Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan is the result of the cumulative efforts of many stakeholders, who have contributed their thoughts and ideas over the past year. The importance of public participation throughout both phases cannot be understated. Engagement was the underpinning of the project and woven throughout, and the Plan document reflects the numerous community touch points and resulting feedback. The engagement activities are summarized within the plan document. A Community Advisory Committee (CAC) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) were also formed to help champion public engagement and provide feedback throughout the process. The TAC received content and material throughout the full plan drafting process. In response, the TAC has delivered feedback on the development of the various plan chapters to staff and the project consulting team. The city's various boards and commissions also participated actively in the development of the Monticello 2040 Plan. In July and September of 2020, the Planning Commission and City Council met with the Lakota Group/WSB consulting team to provide specific direction for the preparation of the Plan. The EDA and PARC also held meetings in mid to late 2020 for the purpose of providing direction and reviewing draft chapter materials. The IEDC also had an opportunity to review and comment on the Economic Development Chapter. In October of 2020, the following chapters, including their respective implementation Goals, Policies and Strategies, were posted to the City's website: Land Use, Growth & Annexation, Mobility & Connectivity, Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Economic Development, Parks, Pathways & Open Space, Community Character, Design & The Arts. With these chapters, a Community Feedback Guide was offered to solicit comments from community stakeholders. A Community Workshop was held on October 22nd, 2020 to inform and solicit additional comment. Multiple attendance platforms were offered to enhance participation opportunity. Comments received through the Feedback Guide and workshop have been incorporated within the draft Plan chapters presented to the Planning Commission for public hearing. The Lakota Group has made some minor clerical and grammatical corrections to the public hearing draft, which are reflected in the version now presented to the City Council for adoption. In addition, staff noted errors in park and open space land use designations which have been corrected on both the Land Use Map as well as the various maps in the Parks, Pathways and Open Space Chapter. A summary of those changes is attached. Lakota has also noticed that there are some minor legend and route coding errors within the Park Chapter which require correction; these can be made in the final version prepared for posting. Board Review and Recommendation EDA: The Economic Development Authority reviewed the public hearing draft of the Economic Development Chapter and the related Goals, Policies and Strategies from the 2 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 Implementation Chapter during their October 28th, 2020 meeting. The EDA unanimously recommended the adoption of the Economic Development Chapter of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan, including the Economic Development Goals, Policies, and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter. The EDA did not recommend any further changes to the document. Planning Commission: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan on November 2nd, 2020. Prior to the hearing, the Commission received one letter of public comment on the Future Land Use Map. During the hearing, the Commission received testimony from the author of the letter of public comment. The letter and draft minutes are attached for reference. The Commission recognized the complexity of the parcel and potential use, but did not recommend a change from the proposed land use designation of Employment Campus. Following the public hearing, the Commission recommended adoption of the Comprehensive Plan as presented. At the time of the Planning Commission's consideration, they did not have the PARC recommendation below. PARC: The Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission reviewed the public hearing draft of the Parks, Pathways and Open Space Chapter and the related Implementation component at a special meeting on November 10th, 2020. The PARC also reviewed the Community Character, Design and The Arts Chapter for comment at that time. Following review, the PARC unanimously recommended adoption of the Parks, Pathways and Open Space chapter of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan, including the Goals, Policies, and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter, subject to those revisions or additions requested by the PARC as follows: 1. Addition of language relating to the evolution of Swan Park 2. Addition of existing and planned pathways throughout BCOL on maps in the chapter 3. Adjust Mississippi River legend and map color for differentiation purposes, Exhibit 6.9 4. On the Future Land Use Map, illustrate the city -owned Walnut Street parcel as City Parks & Recreation (PR), rather than Downtown Mixed -Use (DMU) City Council is asked to comment on any of these recommended changes by PARC as part of their motion, specifically item 4. The PARC's recommendation for the Walnut Street parcel is based on the ability to use this parcel for park and art related purposes on an on-going basis. If a development -related proposal was made to the city, the super - majority required to re -guide the parcel was viewed as a means to ensure the proposed use is supportive to the goals of the downtown. Any changes to the Comprehensive Plan requested as part of Council's motion will be made and a final version of the full document prepared. 3 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 The Comprehensive Plan is a critical tool for guiding the future of Monticello, providing the framework for community growth and setting the course for achieving the City's stated vision and goals. Pending adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the city would immediately begin working on implementation as outlined within the plan itself. Like the development of the Monticello 2040 Plan itself, this will require the involvement of the city's multiple boards, commissions, staff and stakeholders. Goals from the plan will set the foundation for many of the city's activities, including budgeting, capital improvement planning. As a matter of practice, Council agenda staff reports will include the item's relationship to the Monti2040 plan as part of analysis for each item. Regular reviews of the Comprehensive Plan would also be incorporated into board and commission annual workplans and activities. In terms of outreach and communication, the City website would be updated to reflect the adopted plan. The Monti2040 video will continue to be promoted and distributed. In addition, staff will communicate the adoption to the community through various formats and outlets. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommends Alternative 1 below. Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan requires a super -majority vote of the City Council. 1. Motion to adopt resolution 2020-83 for the adoption of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan, based on findings in said resolution, subject to those comments or revisions as stated by the City Council. 2. Motion to deny adoption of resolution 2020-83 for the adoption of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative 1 above. Staff believes the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan is reflective of the direction provided by the boards and commissions of the City, and of the many stakeholders who have provided input. This recommendation is subject to any revisions requested by the City Council, including the land use designation for two noted parcels as follows: 1. Walnut Street parcel, City -owned 2. CSAH 75 parcel, privately owned Adoption of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan will provide a foundation for decision-making for the future of the community. As noted, it becomes a critical tool for moving the community forward toward its shared vision. 4 A SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2020-83 City Council Agenda: 11/23/2020 B. Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Draft 1. Executive Summary & Introduction 2. Monticello Today & Tomorrow 3. Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation 4. Mobility & Connectivity 5. Economic Development 6. Parks, Pathways & Open Space 7. Community Character, Design & Open Space 8. Community Facilities & Infrastructure C. Monticello 2040 Communi . Vision D. Public Comment Letter E. Land Use Designation Consideration Parcels a. Walnut Parcel b. East Broadway Parcel F. Summary of Corrections to Hearing Draft G. Planning Commission Minutes, 11/2/20 - DRAFT 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2020-83 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MONTICELLO 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, A COMPILATION OF POLICY STATEMENTS, GOALS, STANDARDS, AND MAPS FOR GUIDING THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 462.355 provides that the planning agency for the municipality shall prepare a comprehensive municipal plan and shall periodically review the plan; and W WHEREAS, the City of Monticello adopted a Comprehensive Plan in 2008; and WHEREAS, it is in the City's best interest to reevalua comprehensive plan and consider and analyze changes that have occurred over the ye7Wnd WHEREAS, the City of Monticello authorized thiew and to of its Comprehensive Plan in 2019; and I W WHEREAS, the proposed Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan reflects a community planning process conducted in the years 2019 and 2020 involving elected officials, appointed officials, city staff, community organizations, the public at large, developers, and other stakeholders; an WHEREAS, the City, through its g Comm on and other committees and groups, has undertaken a thorough anal of changes occurring since the last Comprehensive Plan and studied projected fu development, and anticipated demands regar ing public infrastructure, facilities se es, and; WHEREAS,he proposed Monticello 040 Comprehensive Plan is a planning tool iN to guide the future Band development of the City of Monticello; and S, the att d 2040 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Monticello has been prepa or revie d approval by the City Council, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 2nd � 2020 on the draft Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan is adopted and is effective as of the date of this resolution. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2020-83 ADOPTED this 23rd day of November, 2020, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk 1 MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Brian Stumpf, Mayor Angela Schumann Comunity Development Director Cityof Monticello Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Angela, October 28, 2020 The land on the north side of East Broadway and south of I-94 across from Oak Meadow Drive (PID 213-000-183101 and PID 213-000-184203) is in an area surrounded by residential neighborhoods. On the proposed Land Use Plan, the area is designated as Employment Campus, a designation that allows Advanced Manufacturing, Renewable Resources and Industrial Engineering Facilities. Employment Campus does not blend well with a residential neighbohood. There have been those associated with the city that have expressed feelings that there should be no residential development along I-94. Yet, on the future Land Use Plan, an area between T'' street and I- 94, one half mile in length, has residential friendly designation. Also there already is residential development next to I-94 for nearly 2 miles. Residential development exists next to freeways all over the USA. Comunity and Residential Flex would be a much better land use designation for this property because it would allow for more residential friendly uses such as Office/Retail, Professional Service, Hotel, as well as Mixed Density Residential. Please consider this at the next public meeting regarding the Future Land Use Plan on November 2, 2020. Sincerely, Mike Schneider Walnut Street Parcel 3 N t4 izM---O nticelloCITY OF K-11131� wk, 4;I 1in=188 ft N A November 17, 2020 Map Powered By DataLink wsb� �o 9.6 I,. Ln rn rn rn rn rn' o •. t Vo 252 cn'n- d 12 2520 25 4 0 2gpS �7 Z6Q8= T+ r� 2504 �(71 As :. a 95TH ST N � o GS- 0 co s O I" . - 0 4 LE Jrn 885 ° co g .er m op o a • 'w, ?' G 9251 N 250.8 cfl .N A N 2 s Ni- s-.. ry 2. E'D�dAK LN!NE _ TF IS • + _ 1 s� norm,�All 643 \ • -9721 � � y' 9691. C',9681 i58$: O 9661,.-k` 9651 t 59..E . 9631 :. ' C.0a, 96 96 95 a 95TH ST N � o GS- 0 co s O I" . - 0 4 LE Jrn 885 ° co g .er m op o a • 'w, ?' G 9251 N 250.8 cfl .N A N 2 s Ni- s-.. ry 2. E'D�dAK LN!NE _ TF IS • + _ 1 s� norm,�All 643 \ Summary of Edits for City Council Review Version (Changes made to Public Hearing Draft) 11-23-20 • Future Land Use Map and Park Chapter Exhibit 6.1: o Corrected land use designation for four private property parcels near the river and River Street, a small residential area in Cardinal Hills, and the private multi- family property along 7t" Street — incorrectly designated as open space or park. ■ Acreage counts have been updated in graphics/text for these changes • Park Chapter o BCOL Regional Park has been hatched to illustrate both open space and park character. o Note/asterisk has been added to Park Chapter Exhibit 6.1 addressing private recreation areas. o Other park -related parcel corrections where parks were incorrectly labeled/shown. For example, the special use facility, Moose Sherritt Ice Arena, was drawn northwest of the school when it is located to the southeast. o Park updates to Exhibit 6.1 as noted above were made to all of the other exhibits in the Parks Chapter. • Reordering of the implementation section • Addition of headers (pg. 74-75) • MontiArts quick edit for spelling (pg. 169) MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, November 2nd, 2020 - 6:15 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Sam Murdoff, Paul Konsor, and Andrew Tapper Commissioners Absent: John Alstad and Alison Zimpfer Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Ron Hackenmueller, and Scott Ruhland (Lakota Group) 1. General Business A. Call to Order Sam Murdoff called the Regular Meetin of the Lcello Planning Commission to order at 6:15 p.m. B. Consideration of approvin2liNtes a. Regular Meeting Minutes — Octobt 5th, 2020 PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO APPROVE THE RE AR MEETING MINUTES — OCTOBER, 5TH, 2020. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MO ION. MOVIED, CARRIED, 3-0. C. Citizen Comments None.. ,I D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda N/A A E. Consideration to approve agenda ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS IT STANDS. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. 2. Public earings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to "Places to Live", Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary and Final Plat for a 54 lot detached single-family subdivision Applicant: Shawn Weinand/LSW Investments, LLC Steve Grittman reviewed the land use application request and provided the location of the proposed residential development. He noted that it is a 20 acre parcel that is located at the intersection at 85th Street North East and Edmonson Avenue and adjacent to the Featherstone development. The proposed plan would connect by streets with Featherstone with access only provided by interior streets. Grittman provided a site plan and noted that the lots were proposed to be single family residential, but would require a Planned Unit Development as it varies from the standard Monticello Zoning Code. The report uses the T -N (Traditional Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 1 114 Neighborhood Residence) District as a baseline, but the report also references the R-1 (Single Family Residence) District and R-2 (Single and Two -Family Residence) District zoning standards to understand how this proposal fits in the context of what our current zoning might require and also seeing how the applicant is seeking PUD flexibility from base standards. The median lot size is 10,600 square feet, which is smaller lots than the R-1, but slightly larger than the T -N. The project is slightly denser than Featherstone, but the City still considers the proposal to be low density. The proposal indicates a range of lot sizes from 6,800 square feet to 30,000 square feet. It was noted that the larger lots would be encumbered by drainag onds. Grittman noted the review requirement fo Grittman also noted that the proposal included a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "Urban Reserve" to "Places to Live". He stated that also on the agenda was an item to consider adoption of an updated Comprehensive Plan. The draft plan guides the land as "Mixed Neighborhood". A mixed neighborhood would include single family as well as some rafito high density attached housing. Grittman noted that the proposed plat and PUDWould not be in conflict with the proposed Comprehensive Plan. He also added that the PUD aspect is met in at least one way by providing an alternative housing design not commonly seen in the community. I Grittman provided a review of the staff report and kibit Z comments, including those related to driveway design, parking availability and landscaping recommendations. Staff recommended approval of the land use application. b&j Rk Sam Murdoff asked if Featherstone is'a PUD. Grittman confirmed and stated that it was created that way primarily because the larger Featherstone project anticipated a mix of housing and.commercial development in the area. The R-1 standards are used for the current single-family Featherstone development and one of the standards have been flexed. Murdoff was concerned about having the evelopment without any major road outlet. Grittman demonstrated access to the site and noted that people could get to the collector system fairly quickly without having to wind very far through the Featherstone neighborhood. Murdoff asked if the Featherstone development was designed to handle additional traffic with a development of this parcel. Grittman confirmed that the access points in Featherstone -were specifically designed to allow access to the proposed property development. The designation for the proposed development parcel was not made prior to the platting of Featherstone, but Grittman thought that it was generally an expectation that this property would develop as residential, but the density was not determined by the Comprehensive Plan or at the time of the Featherstone project. Grittman thought that there would not be an undue burden on the roadways on Featherstone. Murdoff asked for an estimate on projected vehicle trips on the roadway. Grittman suggested less than a total of 400 trips including the existing and that traffic would likely distribute evenly north and west. Angela Schumann also noted that because 85th Street and Edmonson Avenue are considered collector routes, the access spacing would be problematic to include Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 2 114 additional access to either collector road. It was noted that there has been some discussion of a future roundabout at 85th Street and Edmonson Avenue and that the proposed development would accommodate such improvement if desired. Paul Konsor asked what is proposed for Block 3, Lot 19. Grittman noted that it is a different house design than what is seen for most of the proposed development. Grittman assumed a three -stall garage with a larger structure. Elevations were shown to the commission. Konsor asked for clarification on the number of proposed garage stalls per lot as there were discrepancies between the applicant's submittal and the staff report. Grittman noted that it was not known from the plans submitted and that the Exhibit Z conditions would require clarification. Grittman noted that the issue for staff is that most h the driveways appear to be narrow and appear to be drawn to the wrong side of the structure on the plat. Staff presume that there are more two stall garages than the applicant was planning, but clarification was needed. Murdoff wondered if this information was typically required to be cleared up in advance of the meeting. If the Planning Commission made a recommendation on the decisions for the application, the application would not be further considered by the board, presuming the applicant can meet the conditions assigned to the proposal. Grittman noted that it was not necessary to have that information to move the plat forward, but that it would need to be clarified as there is enough room to do it. Grittman explained that the final layout for each unit design may change after approval of the Preliminary Plat, as often times developers build as requested. Some property owners may have different needs for garage stall spaces. However, Grittman noted that the standards would need to be figured out in advance so that we are not dating utility or parking along streets problems. Judgements can be mads development is constructed. Sam Mu11f opend4he public hearing and invited the applicant to speak first. Grittman quickly added tflat one additpnal item was to be added to the conditions, requiring that this approval is conditional upon approval of the annexation. Shawn Weinand, the applt, asked staff to show all of the drawings of the architecture. He noted that there are four different styles of homes. Weinand noted that they tried to create a similar exterior so that it would create a neighborhood feel, but also have flexibility so that there was different floorplans and variety of buyers. Homes would range from a two to six bedroom home. Weinand explained that what made this project unique was the architecture and that he wanted to have a similar feeling as in Autumn Ridge Villas. He explained that they are trying to create a single family home that is on a little smaller of a lot, with a bigger driveway, and public streets. Weinand noted that it was unknown at this time what lots would accommodate which size garage. He noted that a majority of two stall garages would be located in the center due to the size of the lots. The perimeter of the project would be primarily three stall garage. He noted that they have found out through the Autumn Ridge project that people prefer a larger garage. The houses range on main level from 1,500 square feet to 2,100 square feet. The applicant requested a minimum finished square footage of 1,250 square feet to allow flexibility by the buyers. The lots would run an estimated $45,000 Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 3 114 more than Autumn Ridge. Weinand noted they are trying to develop a unique, step-up housing and sell out within five years. Weinand noted that they are making all changes or saw no issues with the concerns of staff. He noted that ample driveway and public street parking would be provided. Weinand noted that he would like to request that the minimum square footage of the garages be set at 440 square feet rather than 450 square feet due to dimensional issues. He expected that very few of the garages would be less the 24 feet in width. He noted that the development would more than compliment neighboring development. He added that each house would be landscaped. An association would be formed, but would not manage the lawn or snow removal of the driveway. Covenants would be set in place to help keep a clean neighborhood. A mix of ages was envisioned for this neighborhood. Weinand noted he had copies of thekhanges proposed by staff. Weinand noted on proposed Lot 4, 5, and 6 Block 3 a drain pipe and easement existed causing the shape of the lot to be as noted. He would work with his development team on alternatives, but welcomed staff commendation. Murdoff asked what zoning dithe developer would like to utilize as a base for the PUD flexibility. Weinand that he was seeking a PUD to create a feeling of a controlle eighborhoo with some continuity and some architectural control. 'V Paul Konsor asked for clarification on any homeowner's association. Weinand noted that there would be an association only to control the architecture and the covenants, but generally not for maintenance. If a monument sign was constructed, an association would be minimal to maintain. Weinand confirmed there would be an official homeowner's association to control the covenants. Konsor also asked if the applicant would like to amend his application to include an adjustment to the minimum garage square footage. Weinand noted that he didn't see that condition until today and as part of the PUD he requested that it be changed to 440 square feet. Konsor noted a concern with the clashing of step-up ousing with a smaller garage square footage. Weinand noted that he actually had 0 square feet on plans he submitted. Murdoff asked for clarification on lot sizes for the proposed development. Tapper noted that the numbers would shift because of the shifting of outlots, but that the median lot size would not change much. Tapper asked if most of the large lots included the drainage ponds. Grittman confirmed. Weinand asked staff if the zoning they were comparing it to was 7,500 square feet for lot size. Grittman confirmed it was 7,500 square feet in the T -N and there are only a couple below that number. Tapper asked for a neighborhood that was comparable to a T -N District. Grittman noted the entry portion of Carlisle Village from Country Road are similar to the T -N size. Sunset Ponds also has T -N similar properties. Charlotte Gabler asked about park dedication. Schumann explained that the overall park dedication recommendation would come from the Parks, Arts, and Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 4 114 Recreation Commission on November 10. She noted that staff look at the half mile spacing requirement for parks and noted the proximity to a linear park found at Featherstone. In addition, staff comments regarding the sidewalks was to ensure good connections especially to the Featherstone development and that park. Finally as part of the park dedication requirement, the applicant is proposing two, ten foot bituminous pathways along Edmonson Avenue and 85th Street. Gabler asked for clarification on park design envisioned in Featherstone. Schumann noted that a tot lot/playground has already been constructed. She noted that an amenity that is often requested is natural pathways and they would be incorporated into the park while also incorporating stormwater ponds and views in this area. 1&& Murdoff asked if the developer looked at a different plat configuration. Weinand noted that the design proposed was the rost efficient, best flow, and use of property. Tapper noted that curved streets also serves as a traffic calming measure. Weinand also added that they were working with two existing streets and had to follow drainage of streets. The contour of the two surrounding neighborhoods also needed to be followed. Sewer and water were also stubbed in from those streets. 4 Murdoff asked the applicant for more information on the fimshab square footage of space exceptions they were proposing. Weinand noted that that finishable square footage of space for the two or three stall garages were very similar. The base square footage is 1,650 square feet, but they want flexibility on this request. The 3 or 4 level split, is about 1,540 squoe feet with potential for an additional 600 to 1,000 square feet to finish off. If a finished basement was added to the two or three stall garages, it was estimated that 3,200 to 3,600 square feet of finished square feet. On the 2 story with tuck under garage, it was estimated at 2,200 square feet with expansion of an office or loft area that could go up to 2,500 square feet. There would be plenty of expansion room if desired. He also explained that these homes provided steep roof pitches. Weinand noted the importance of bringing step-up housing to the community and the importance of having higher lot and home prices in the community. Schumann clarified the T -N and R-1 district standards for finished and finishable square footage. She asked if Murdoff was looking for how many lots would meet or exceed the finishable square footage of 2,000 square feet or better. Weinand noted that if they have a crawl space, they might have something that is not finishable of more than 1,250, but that would be rare. He was asking for flexibility in the PUD for this section of the code to bz-flexible to the market demand. Schumann noted the importance of looking at the grading plan and the building design standards on that grading plan for look out or walk out homes. Weinand encouraged the Planning Commission to see how Autumn Ridge Villas is developing. Neil Mccarty, 4462 87th Street NE, noted concerns of the proposed new development especially as it relates to increased traffic in the Featherstone subdivision and why additional access points couldn't directly serve the proposed neighborhood. Mccarty also had questions regarding enforcement of covenants. Murdoff responded that the proposed development would have an association that would enforce covenants. Ron Hackenmueller noted that there is the zoning Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 5 114 ordinance that is enforced by the City and the covenants are enforced by the developer. Angela Schumann noted that Edmonson Avenue on the east portion of this development is a County right of way and that they have control on access management. She added that there are access spacing guidelines in place for both 85th and Edmonson. Schumann noted spacing would be difficult and subject to review by the City Engineer, who did not comment on an access issues in their comment letter. Grittman noted that the typical County road spacing is a quarter mile, but sometime is down to an 1/8 of a mile (660 feet). The distance between 85th and 87th Street is 1,100 feet, but that you could not have an access that would maintain a road at 660 feet from both streets. Mccarty also suggested that the Commission have ?he most complete and any revised information about the development prior to making any decisions. Schumann noted the application's for which the public hearing was held and the planning process. She mentioned that the City Council would review any recommendation for approval of the discussed land use application. If approved by City Council, the applicant would be required to file for Final Plat and Final Stage Planned Unit Development which is also subject to approval of the City Council. 4 1 Schumann noted that one additional comment letter was submitted from a property owner in the Featherstone development. That letter was included in the agenda packet. Schumann summarized concerns of density and property value. Hearing comments, the public hearing was4losed. Murdoff echoed concerns and wanted clarification on driveway size, minimum finishable and finished square feet, and size of house on lot. Tapper responded that the developer indicated he is not sure what the future holds and a buyer will want. Tapper asked the developer if these homes would be built on specification. Weinand declined, but noted a certain amount of specification is used. Murdoff suggested minimum standards for lot size categories. Gabler explained that the PUD would utilize the base zoning standards of the R -I and T -N. Murdoff indicated that he wasn't comfortable not knowing which zoning designation standards to utilize for the development. Grittman explained that a PUD has to stand on its own and that staff present comparable districts to understand what the contexut that we are not granting variances to the R- I or T -N District. The City wou view this project as a standalone project with its own zoning district. The Planning -Commission role is to understand if the project does a better job of meeting the City's development goals than a standard zoning district would. Grittman noted that zoning districts can be useful comparatives and put projects into context, but not the standard that is applied to a PUD. Grittman reiterated staff's recommendation of approval and felt that it meets the development goals set forth by the City. Konsor asked if there are still guidelines that would be followed under the PUD, such as setbacks. Grittman confirmed there are functional guidelines. Grittman further responded to the question of knowing whether each lot would be up to the standard that the City is trying to achieve. We are trying to identify what the minimum standard that we expect the applicant to achieve and be comfortable with. It would be assumed that the market would also Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 6 114 play a role so that someone that pays more for a lot is going to put a larger home on it. It was acknowledged by Grittman that this is not always the case. Schumann added that the elevations that the applicant included are the standard. The elevations including the types of materials, the amount of materials, orientation of materials, the breakup of the facades, quality of the materials, and the number of materials that provide visual interest are used as a guidebook. Decision 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-029, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE GUIDED USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "URBAN RESERVE" TO "PLACES TO LIVE", BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS INCORPORATED IN EXHIBIT Z WITH THE ADDITION OF THE CONTIGENCY OF ANNEXATION AND THE GARAGE SPACE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 440 SQUARE FEET. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 2-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF VOTING IN OPPOSITION. � Decision 2. ANDREW TAPPER RECOMMENDING AP TO PUD, PLANNED UN FINDINGS NOTFjQ IN Tl THE MOTION. N&ION OPPOSITION. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-030, OF REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 3LOPMENT DISTRICT, BASED ON THE OLUTION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED ED, 2-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF VOTING IN Decision 3. Preliminary Plat ANDREW TAPPER MOVED OPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-031, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DMONSON RIDGE, BASED ON THE FINDINGS NOTED IN THE OLUTION AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS INCORPORATED IN IBIT Z WITH THE ADDITION OF THE CONTIGENCY OF ANNEXATION'AND THE GARAGE SPACE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 440 SQUARE FEET. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 2-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF VOTING IN OPPOSITION. Decision 4. Development Stage PUD ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-032, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR EDMONSON RIDGE, BASED ON THE FINDINGS NOTED IN THE RESOLUTION AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS INCORPORATED IN EXHIBIT Z WITH THE ADDITION OF THE CONTIGENCY OF ANNEXATION AND THE GARAGE SPACE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 440 SQUARE FEET. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 7 114 MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 2-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF VOTING IN OPPOSITION. EXHIBIT Z Comprehensive Plan Amendment to "Places to Live", Rezoning to PUD, Development Stage PUD, and Preliminary Plat for Edmonson Ridge Legal Description (lengthy): The South 933 feet of the East 933 feet of the Northwest Quarter both measured at right angles thereof Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The approval of the Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD is subject to approval of the requested Annexation, rezoning and applicable Comprehensive Plan amendment, and the annexation is processed by the Office of Administrative Hearings per the MOAA. A sidewalk is built along 86th Street NE connecting to the proposed sidewalk connection from Edmonson Way. The private trail in the middle of Block will be removed. S� Applicant will provide drawings'' entifying widths and design at correspond to house styles and elevations. 7111 Applicant shall provide unit floor plans to IR space as part of the Final Stage PUD review. L, V, attached garages and living The connecting trails to the external collector roads wime platted to 30' in width. The applicant may choose to plat just one such outlot in the southeast corner of the plat to provide convenient pedestrian acce*to the regional pathway system. 7.infiltration basins will be deeded to City as a drainage and utility easement with nservation easement signs installed. 8. The infiltration basins shall have access for maintenance consistent with the recommendations of the City Engineer. Ivik 9. The development is subject to the requirements of the City Engineer, per the letter dated October 21, 2020 10. Landscape treatments are added to delineate the private and public boundaries along the infiltration basin areas. 11. Landscape treatments are added at the perimeter of the platted area adjacent to the rear yards and collector roadways to create a buffer and increase rear yard privacy for residents. 12. The applicant enters into a development agreement as a condition of Final Plat and Final PUD approval. Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 8 114 13. The minimum garage size for all units shall be set at 440 square feet. 14. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. B. Consideration of an Interim Use Permit for Monticello Public Works for Public Warehousing, Temporary Applicant: City of Monticello Steve Grittman explained the request for Interim Use Permit by the City of Monticello. He reminded the Commission that the Zoning Ordinance was recently amended to add public temporary storage as a secondary use of property and was allowed with an Interim Use Permit in the B-3, or I-2 districts. This would allow the City of Monticello Public Works to haSa location for temporary storage until they can accommodate storage space through new construction or otherwise. The proposal is for storage to occur at the Custom Canopy site along Edmonson Avenue, zoned B-3 (Highway Business). Grittman highlighted the building that is being considered to being used for the storage. The City would use the building for seasonal equipment storage, but could be utilized for other storage uses. They anticipate a relatively low volume of traffic coming and going from this site and would comply with the terms of the permit/ordinance. Following the comple 'on of the IUP, the property would return to its typical B-3 uses. Staff recommended approval of the application with conditions identified in Exhibit Z. Grittman noted at the previous Planning Commission meeting there was concerns of the types of storage especially hazardous materials and if it would raise concerns for surrounding properties. Staff specifically added Item 3 of Exhibit Z to addresthose concerns. Grittman noted that some of the materials may be classified as hazardous materials by the PCA, but there are storage handling requirements for that material. lqr Sam Murdoff opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. PAUL KONSOR MOVED 10 ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-033, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR PUBLIC WAREHOUSING, TEMPORARY, IN THE WESTERN -MOST BUILDING AT 1305 EDMONSON AVE. NE, FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED 5 YEARS, OR WHEN THE LEASE FOR SUCH STORAGE TERMINATES, WHICHEVER IS SOONER. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. EXHIBIT Z Interim Use Permit for Public Warehousing, Temporary 1305 Edmonson Ave. NE PID 155500142401 The term of the Interim Use Permit shall be five years from the date of City Council approval, or upon termination of the City's lease for the property, whichever is sooner. Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 9 114 2. The Interim Use Permit grants no additional rights to use the property for leased warehousing/storage beyond the applicable zoning regulations for the property. 3. The City/tenant shall at all times maintain stored materials and equipment in accordance with all applicable zoning, building, and fire codes, including the provisions of the zoning ordinance authorizing the Interim Use Permit. 4. Comments and recommendations of other staff. C. Consideration of a Request for Adoption of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan Applicant: City of Monticello Angela Schumann introduced the item for recommendation of adoption of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. JThe Planning Commission is asked to consider comments that were received prior to the public hearing including those in the packet and those comments received during the meeting. Schumann noted that the Comprehensive Plan is the City's long range plan and the blueprint for how it will grow ovehhe next twenty years. The need to update the City's Comprehensive Plan was amplified by changes throughout the community itself as well broader land use patterns occurring across the nation. Changes in technology, commercial real estate, the impacts of the pandemic, how we move goods and services, and how we transition from energy based economy and tax base were considered when developing the draft plan. Schumann stressed the amount of stakeholders that were engaged with the plan from the start. Schumann introduced Scott Ruhland from the Lakota Group to provide information on the planning process. 00116Riihhand, the Lakota Group, introduced himself and noted that the plan pro s taken 15 months to develop the updated draft Comprehensive Plan. He noted that the consultant and City have been able to stay on schedule even with the pande ic. The consultants confirmed that they were able to gather a lot feedback fr he community on the plan. Ruhland noted that the project was broken into two phases: visioning and comprehensive plan update. He noted that the consultants wanted to get a feel for the community and to understand what direction the community wanted to go as far as the improvement and development of Monticello over the next twenty years. Community engagement was provided multiple days and in-person and virtual/online opportunities. Ruhland reviewed the approved vision statement, community value statements, and preferred growth scenario with the Commission. Ruhland highlighted extensive community engagement opportunities throughout phase two: comprehensive plan update. Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 10 114 He explained the foundation of the plan is the land use chapter and provided the big picture items that came out of the land use strategies and vision. Ruhland noted that the three themes of the plan are community health, sustainability, and sense of place. Ruhland provided key highlights from each of the proposed draft chapters. Each chapter will have goals, policies, and strategies to achieve the comprehensive plan vision. These will all be included under an implementation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Andrew Tapper noted that he also serves on the IEDC and they recently discussed the completion of a new hotel and hospitality stud He asked where a hotel fits in with the land use classifications. Ruhland noted that the Comprehensive Plan designations are looked at from a high level and the zoning will allow specific uses. The updated Comprehensive Plan give ideas of the types of uses that should locate in the land use categories that have been developed. Ruhland noted for hotels the Comprehensive Plan would be ideal in Regional Commercial, Employment Campus, and Commercial Residential Flex. It was noted that once adopted, the Zoning Ordinance would need tocleaned up to make it consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Ruhland also po ed out in the implementation chapter it includes the la se designations with the corresponding zoning district. Sam Murdoff opened up the public hearing. 1+4 Mike ScOleider, 453 135th Avenue, Foley, explained that he was concerned with property he owns that is between East Broadway and I-94, across from Meadow Oak Drive. He noted that the colors of the land use designations were difficult to tell without a large map. He felt that the designation for Employment Campus for his property does not fit, and felt that a Community Residential Flex would be a N tter fit. He noted the surrounding residential to the parcel and that the ployment Campus seemed too industrial for the area. He noted that the City s been concerned about residential along the interstate, but noted land along f Course Road and near the interstate on the east side of town was designated tial and felt it was a similar parcel to his own. Discussion regarding that particular parcel occurred. Gabler asked if moving that designation to the Commercial and Residential Flex was a better designation and allowed for more discussion. Tapper also asked if determining a designation would discourage people from developing it for a different use. Schumann noted that staff would convey how the parcel was designated and it's intended use, but that a comprehensive plan amendment could always be applied for. Staff agreed that this parcel was difficult to identify a particular designation. Ruhland understood the conflict with the land Schneider noted on the east parcel adjacent to the interstate and being designated residential. Grittman noted concerns with Schneider's parcel being residential and noted a change to the designation to the Commercial and Residential Flex would be more difficult to deny a project that is residential even if it's not a good fit for the parcel. He noted leaving the parcel as Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 11 1 14 Employment Campus gave the City more discretion on the development of that parcel. Schneider indicated that he has owned the land for 15 years and that the economy continues to change. He noted that the flex district would allow some flexibility and felt that having it designated as employment campus would further dissuade people in developing the parcel. He understood the ability to later apply for a Comprehensive Plan update, but noted that the time to make changes would be prior to adoption of the plan rather than amending the new plan. Through the Commercial Residential Flex, it was noted that a Planned Unit Development would be required and allow the City more discretion. 1 PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE ADOPTION OF THE MONTICELLO 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BASED ON FINDINGS IN RESOLUTION PC -2020-034, SUBJECT TO THOSE COMMENTS OR REVISIONS AS STATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE VN. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. 3. Regular Agenda � 1^ A. Consideration of a reauest for a Simple Subdii Combination in a R-1 (Single Family Residence) District to enable a lot line adjustment for public stormwater improvements Applicant: City of Monticello Steve Grittman provided an overview of the item ab*rovided the location of the land use request. Grittman indicated that the proposal is to shift the subdivision line just east of the church's parking lot so that the (expandable) stormwater pond and lift station could be on a single parcel. Grittman provided the recommended proposed adjustment. Grittman noted that the site meets the conditions in the code and that an exception to the platting requirement exists that would accommodate the simple subdivision and lot combination. It is also consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the subdi n is to improve City utility and stormwater management in that region. Staff recommended approval with conditions as displayed in Exhibit Z. F Sam Mur ff asked why the City is having to improve stormwater management in that area. Charlotte Gabler indicated that the pond was incorrectly built from twenty plus years ago. She indicated that a trail easement would also be gained along that area along County Road 39. Murdoff asked if part of the issue due to the development of the senior housing project. Gabler indicated that this is something that has been in the works for the past 1.5 years and that calculations were wrong. Flooding issues predated the development of the senior housing facility. Murdoff thought that part of the senior housing design was that it could pump water to that stormwater pond. Grittman noted that the senior housing project has to retain its own stormwater, but eventually it would go that direction. There is no increase in that pond from the senior housing project. Angela Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 12 114 Schumann added that stormwater management is individual to each developed site. Murdoff raised concerns with why the City would want to change the lot line and ownership to include the existing stormwater pond. Grittman noted that the area is in the City's easement and that the pond is the City's. Rather than expanding the easement, it makes more sense that the City has fee title to its facilities. Schumann added that it is a policy decision that has recently been made that in many cases rather than just drainage and utility easements, developers are asked to put regional ponds in outlots so that they become the property of the City, as the City has to maintain the overall regional stormwater, tem. Paul Konsor asked if the current owners have to sell or convey the land to the City. Grittman noted that the property owners are co -applicants and that they would convey that part of the parcel to the City. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO T RESOLUTION NO. PC -2020-35, RECOMMENDING APPRO F THE SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND LOT COMBINATION FOR THE SU CT PARS S, CONTINGENT ON THE REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED . ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THEASMOTIO IED, 3-0. IT Z Simple Subdivision and tot Comb 'on 300 Riverview Drive jrPIDs155500182202 and 155500201 1. Conveya f Par B to the City upon approval and recording of the ivision. IL it Concu ecording of Lot Combination and incorporated easements as proposed. 3. omments and recommen ions of other Staff. B. Consideration of the Communitv DevelODment Director's Report Angela Schumann added more information about stormwater management. She noted thaMhe City is part of a group paying close attention to County owned, Ditch 33. Sht-explained that the ditch manages County stormwater, but impacts the development potential in the city, especially on the east side of town. She encouraged the Commission to watch the discussions happening at the County, Township, and City level regarding Ditch 33. Schumann provided the Community Development Director's Report as included in the packet. 4. Added Items None. Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 13 114 5. Adjournment SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:34 P.M. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander Approved: December 1st, 2020 Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Planning Commission Minutes — November 2nd, 2020 Page 14 114 Monticello Council Connection November 23, 2020 Transactions October 2020, the DMV processed 10,045 transactions 27 less than October 2020. DMV year -to date revenue is $671,772.94 an increase of $7,640.12 or 1.2% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 DMV Revenue Comparison Oct 2011 Oct 2012 Oct 2013 Oct 2014 Oct 2015 Oct 2016 Oct 2017 Oct 2018 Oct 2019 Oct 2020 DMV YTD Revenue Comparison $800,000 5671,773 $700,000 $600,000 $600,196 $478,856 $488,177 $500,000 $402,598 $396,681 $428,340 $400,000 $310,155 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Oct 2011 Oct 2012 Oct 2013 Oct 2014 Oct 2015 Oct 2016 Oct 2017 Oct 2018 Oct 2019 Oct 2020 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 DMV YTD Transaction Comparison Oct 2011 Oct 2012 Oct 2013 Oct 2014 Oct 2015 Oct 2016 Oct 2017 Oct 2018 Oct 2019 Oct 2020 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 10/30/2020 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 $ 403,520.92 $ 413,534.20 $ 453,978.47 10.0% 9.8% Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 390,050.52 408,769.22 445,332.30 9.4% 8.9% Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 473,811.33 477,467.15 663,855.30 39.3% 39.0% Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 467,192.12 489,072.87 631,721.78 30.5% 29.2% May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 549,206.70 560,332.38 785,494.64 41.0% 40.2% Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 561,287.34 588,209.75 656,099.21 12.1% 11.5% Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 563,935.31 571,270.49 620,426.16 660,202.41 7.0% 6.4% Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 497,201.21 544,029.21 602,951.70 597,700.58 -1.0% -0.9% Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 501,126.67 481,663.70 496,193.64 553,001.20 11.8% 11.4% Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 461,549.38 467,600.32 501,342.95 605,830.73 22.3% 20.8% Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 495,519.24 527,900.06 562,628.37 - -106.6% -100.0% Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 629,143.57 652,695.25 656,366.61 - -100.6% -100.0% Total $ 4,067,185.19 $ 4,351,038.78 $ 4,476,911.24 $ 4,652,921.53 $ 4,845,781.08 $ 5,045,614.65 $ 5,165,741.40 $ 5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 5,760,181.65 $ 6,090,227.96 $ 6,377,295.00 $ 6,053,216.62 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $ 306,377.43 $ 330,046.31 $ 287,067.04 $ (324,078.38) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% 5.6% 5.7% 4.7% -5.1% $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Monthly Hi -Way Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 ■ 2020 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 10/30/2020 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 $ 198,202.11 $ 197,270.15 $ 221,209.18 Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 187,042.58 196,211.84 222,640.46 Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 233,971.24 232,963.84 332,798.19 Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 224,348.27 244,892.28 323,605.96 May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 306,245.55 304,724.08 436,582.76 Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 309,163.93 335,878.00 378,351.43 Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 315,848.83 314,343.95 352,522.92 380,390.43 Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 268,173.42 292,626.23 335,258.06 331,928.29 Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 270,898.13 257,557.44 262,477.64 298,017.83 Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 228,484.62 230,112.85 246,829.33 304,015.53 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 222,993.99 238,870.03 259,282.44 - Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 271,457.72 281,924.05 283,831.51 - Total $ 2,066,536.61 $ 2,187,948.04 $ 2,289,800.74 $ 2,328,734.96 $ 2,483,194.18 $ 2,539,167.70 $ 2,604,942.46 $ 2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 2,933,853.13 $ 3,074,408.23 $ 3,252,142.09 $ 3,229,540.06 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $ 165,459.25 $ 140,555.10 $ 177,733.86 $ (22,602.03) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% 6.0% 4.8% 5.8% -0.7% Monthly Beer Sales .2008 $500,000 ■ 2009 $450,000 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 $400,000 ■ 2012 $350,000 $300,000 _ ■ 2013 $250,000 ■ 2014 __ ■ 2015 $200,000 ■ 2016 $150,000 ■ 2017 $100,000 ■ 2018 $50,000 ■ 2019 $ ■ 2020 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 12.1% 12.1% 14.1% 13.5% 42.7% 42.9% 35.1% 32.1% 43.1% 43.3% 13.7% 12.6% 8.9% 7.9% -1.1% -1.0% 13.8% 13.5% 24.9% 23.2% -108.5% -100.0% -100.7% -100.0% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 10/30/2020 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 $ 133,589.33 $ 142,171.51 $ 156,618.77 10.2% 10.2% Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 128,952.50 142,327.58 148,178.03 4.1% 4.1% Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 151,716.52 159,432.14 222,258.49 39.4% 39.4% Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 136,883.13 147,197.73 193,843.09 31.7% 31.7% May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 160,936.65 170,109.40 238,076.67 40.0% 40.0% Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 168,769.36 166,679.78 190,517.50 14.3% 14.3% Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 160,220.37 170,108.99 178,157.56 192,891.98 8.3% 8.3% Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 144,263.78 164,013.08 180,017.57 178,691.20 -0.7% -0.7% Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 143,252.37 147,649.35 153,415.28 168,453.24 9.8% 9.8% Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 145,864.34 150,852.02 161,850.02 196,727.06 21.5% 21.5% Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 149,468.96 167,360.12 181,489.37 -100.0% -100.0% Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 213,217.73 229,121.92 236,248.55 -100.0% -100.0% Total $ 1,129,350.74 $ 1,214,816.54 $ 1,251,447.54 $ 1,343,108.97 $ 1,396,520.80 $ 1,506,776.00 $ 1,546,117.83 $ 1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 1,739,562.18 $ 1,909,952.97 $ 2,019,096.49 $ 1,886,256.03 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ 114,654.14 $ 170,390.79 $ 109,143.52 $ (132,840.46) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% 7.1% 9.8% 5.7% -6.6% $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 rt Monthly Liquor Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov I� Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 ■ 2020 UI Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov I� Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 ■ 2020 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 10/30/2020 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 $ 60,047.20 $ 61,183.52 $ 62,895.50 2.8% 2.8% Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 58,664.45 62,027.36 58,391.94 61,207.21 4.8% 4.8% Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 64,286.75 74,221.20 70,209.75 91,704.66 30.6% 30.6% Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 69,415.79 93,299.96 83,324.61 96,264.97 15.5% 15.5% May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 82,724.29 61,684.97 67,148.30 84,611.53 26.0% 26.0% Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 58,623.08 61,777.09 62,727.56 62,892.81 0.3% 0.3% Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 64,034.24 64,494.29 64,596.65 62,399.50 -3.4% -3.4% Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 66,304.12 67,701.51 64,188.91 64,865.71 1.1% 1.1% Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 68,220.79 59,923.84 62,984.34 67,867.49 7.8% 7.8% Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 70,516.61 70,894.54 77,535.39 86,852.18 12.0% 12.0% Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 109,969.88 107,567.02 105,744.41 -100.0% -100.0% Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 129,536.28 124,115.79 120,746.12 115,969.12 -100.0% -100.0% Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 889,082.47 $ 894,150.95 $ 904,385.10 $ 894,004.50 $ 741,561.56 Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (38,649.37) $ 5,068.48 $ 10,234.15 $ (10,380.60) $ (152,442.94) Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -4.2% 0.6% 1.1% -1.1% -17.1% $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Jan Monthly Wine Sales Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 ■ 2020 NCITY OF ontic�llo MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER Transactions and visits Year to date (10.31.20), the MCC processed 21,183 transactions compared to 64,298 transactions last year. Year to date membership visits are down by 60,443, totaling 51,245 visits. Member visits are up by 696 visits for the month of October compared to last month. Members are at a total of 3,789 compared to 4,761 last year at this time. We have had 92 members renew and 75 new membersjoin in October. 856 members are on a COVID temporary membership freeze and 14 members have canceled their membership in October. The MCC year to date revenue is down from the previous year by $730,160, totaling $669,572. Cost of operating the facility is $506,288 through the month of October 2020. Bottom line as of 10.31.20 was $163,284. Revenue, transactions, member visits and memberships are down due to the COVID-19 shut down of the community center and the delay of the city's lease payment to the MCC. MCC 10/31 YTD Activity 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 MEN M YTD Transactions YTD Member Visits ■ 2018 ■ 2019 ■ 2020 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 MCC 10/31 YTD Revenue ■ 2018 ■ 2019 ■ 2020 MCC 10/31 Members ■ 2018 ■ 2019 ■ 2020 Council Connection — 11/23/2020 CITY Uf Monticello COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • Sept. 24. 2020 -Remote MN -DEED COVID-19 Conference Call • Sept. 28, 2020 - Attended Rotary Club Meeting • Sept. 29, 2020 - Meeting with Development Prospect • Oct. 1. 2020 - Remote MN -DEED COVID-19 Conference Call • Oct. 5, 2020 - Attended Rotary Club Meeting • Oct. 6, 2020 - Participated in CMRP Framework 2030 Community Feedback Session • Oct. 6-7, 2020 - Participated in City Administrator Interview process • Oct. 8, 2020 - Remote MN -DEED COVID-19 Conference Call • Oct. 9, 2020 - Prospect Meeting via Conference Call • Oct. 12, 2020 - Attended Rotary Club Meeting • Oct. 12, 2020 - Attended EDAM Gov't Relations Committee Meeting via Zoom • Oct. 14, 2020 - Attended Wright County Workforce Pathways Meeting via Zoom • Oct. 15, 2020 - Remote MN -DEED COVID-19 Conference Call • Oct. 19, 2020 - Attended Rotary Club Meeting • Oct. 22, 2020 - Remote MN -DEED COVID-19 Conference Call • Oct. 22, 2020 - Attended Monticello 2040 + Comp Plan Workshop via Go -To • Oct. 26, 2020 - Attended Rotary Club Meeting • Oct. 29, 2020 - Remote MN -DEED Conference Call • Oct. 29, 2020 - Meeting with Development Prospect - PG#1 • Oct. 29, 2020 - Meeting with Development Prospect - PG#2 • Nov. 2, 2020 - Attended Rotary Club Meeting • Nov. 5, 2020 - Remote MN -DEED COVID-19 Conference Call • Nov. 9, 2020 - Attended Rotary Club Meeting via Zoom • Nov. 10, 2020 - MN -DEED Energy Transitions Webinar • Nov. 12, 2020 - Remote MN -DEED COVID-19 Conference Call • Nov. 16, 2020 - Attended Rotary Club Meeting Council Connection — 11/23/2020 • Nov. 16, 2020 — Phone Conference with Development Prospect • Nov. 19, 2020 — Meeting with Development Prospect EDA Emergency Small Business Grant Program Update: A total of 38 grants were approved by the EDA to assist businesses that were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic starting in June 2020 and ending on October 28, 2020. The grants were in the amount of $5,000. The total amount of grant funding distributed was $190,000. The funding source was the CARES Act dollars that were provided to the City. The City allocated $200,000 to the EDA via resolution at the July 27, 2020 meeting. The grantees consisted of restaurants, hair salons, message therapy salons, chiropractors, dentists, niche retail businesses, micro -brewery pubs, hotels and specialty service businesses. The funds were able to be used for general working capital purposes such as inventory, payroll, rent, mortgage payment, utility payments, internet service, minor facility repairs and purchase of PPE and sanitation products and regular supplies. Almost all of the grantees experienced negative employee impacts (only a few did not reduce the number of employees) compared to the time frame prior to the COVID-19 shutdowns that occurred in March 2020. All of the businesses indicate a reduction in gross revenue with some seeing decreases of 45 percent compared to a similar timeframe in 2019. The Chamber of Commerce was one of the grantees as they too have been negatively impacted by a loss of networking and fundraising opportunities as well as some members not renewing their membership. The Chamber of Commerce's $5,000 award is the only grant that had to be sourced from the local GMEF program due its organizational status (like Chambers nationwide) which is ineligible to receive CARES Act funding assistance. The extra CARES Act economic assistance grant funding, approved by the City Council on November 13, 2020, was distributed to the six restaurants and the two microbrewery pubs who had previously received help, providing them each an additional $11,556.61 to be used in a similar manner as the EDA's $5,000 grant awards. All grant recipients must provide proof of expenditures documentation to City staff by early 2021. Jill Agosto Building Facade Improvement Project: This project is nearly complete. The EDA approved a $50,000 Facade Grant to Ms. Agosto to redo the front facade of her commercial office building located at 142 West Broadway on June 24, 2020. The fagade upgrade was completed based on the plans and renderings provided to the EDA by Cuningham Architects, Minneapolis. The total building improvement upgrades were approximately $115,000 +/-. With this as the first completed fagade improvement project in Block 35, it may spur other nearby property owners to make investments into their buildings as well in 2021. The EDA reviews each fagade improvement grant application submittal on a case- by-case basis as to the quality of the proposal and the benefits it offers to the overall Fagade Improvement Program goals and objectives. Please see the before and after photos of the Agosto Building. A ik 4M it\1100h LAWBUILDING, Council Connection — 11/23/2020 OF M04ieflo COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Monticello Community Garden For the past 11 years, a small parcel of land behind the Monticello Community Center has been transformed into the Monticello Community Gardens. Each year, the garden is consistently filled (or close) to capacity. This year was no exception and in fact we had a waiting list! There were twenty-nine plots that measured approximately 15 x 20 feet and were $30 to rent for the season. Throughout the growing season, from mid-May to mid-October, gardeners were encouraged to plant and maintain organic produce and donate their surplus produce to the local food shelf. The City of Monticello provided gardening supplies stored in an on-site shed, access to water, and general maintenance of the overall space. The garden project is managed by the Community Development Department by the Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Jacob Thunander. Staff will release a survey to 2020 gardeners to gather thoughts and recommendations for next year's program. Monticello Planning Commission Vacancy With the election of Sam Murdoff to the City Council, a vacancy will be created on the Planning Commission. Staff has posted the opening and will work with the Commission and Council to fill the position. Council members are encouraged to talk with their friends and neighbors who are Monticello residents about any interest in the position. CMRP Updates Given the Council's discussion regarding the last CMRP meeting with representatives from Federal Highway Administration and MnDOT, staff has included the background information from the presentation. As noted, CMRP Partners were interested in hearing more about the process and funding potential for improvements which might benefit the region, such as a future bridge crossing. The discussion yielded a good deal of information on the need for regional collaboration. The Partners will be meeting on December 3rd as their next regular meeting. They will be discussing the organizational goals as well as progress on the Framework 2030, CMRP's regional planning and economic development project. Also included for Commission's reference is a guide to Framework 2030 work products and resources. FRAM6.. � 2030 WnRK partnering for the future 1 r V �� Bit To: Partnership Re: Framework 2030 Project Update Date: November 10, 2020 This is the third of what we intend to be regular updates to the Partnership highlighting completed, in -progress, and planned (short term) tasks for the Framework 2030 planning project. See below for contact information if you have questions. The project timeline has been revised and is included on the final page of this memo. Brackets "[#.#]" indicate task item reference from Regional Planning Scope. Component 1: Preparation Substantive preparation creates a strong foundation for this complex process. This component orients the Consultant and Partnership to the planning process, reviews existing plans and relevant information, and builds a solid foundation for stakeholder and public engagement. Completed • Orientation and project preparation o Plan, study, and data library [1.3] o Regional tour (consultants) [1.1] o Partner / consultant one-on-one interviews [1.1] • Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o New brand and logo [1.4] o Key messages and Frequently Asked Questions [1.5] o Project communications plan [1.5] o Press Release #1 [1.6] o Project webpage [1.6] o Outreach portal [1.6] o Organization chart [1.6] 30-90 days • Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o Continued website updates and monitoring [1.6] Component 2: Engagement Stakeholder engagement runs concurrently with other activities and ensures that stakeholders in the Partner Framework 2030 Project Update Page 1 of 5 communities and others throughout the region who want to participate in the process have the opportunity to do so. The approach will be developed in coordination with the Process Consultant and reflected in the Engagement Design and Implementation Plan and to ensure that work is complementary and efficiently managed. Partnership staff and members will have important responsibilities for conducting engagement, with substantial support from the Consultant, Process Consultant, and other Partner entities. Completed • Stakeholder engagement planning o Stakeholder mapping exercise [2.1] o Engagement planning matrix [2.1] o Tailored online survey development [2.1.1] o Physical survey and discussion kits [2.1.1] o Stock engagement invitation letters [2.1.1] • Round 1 Stakeholder engagement execution [2.1.1] o Partner workshop (April 30 Virtual session) [2.1.1] o Initial survey invitation distribution (500+ entities, organizations, or individuals)[2.1.1] o Initial feedback review [2.1.1] o Midstream reporting to Liaison Team [2.1.1] o Continued sharing of engagement invitations and coaching [2.1.1] o Review and refinement of messages and invitation process [2.1.1] o Maintenance and monitoring of submissions [2.1.1] • Round 1 stakeholder final engagement reporting [2.1.1] o Prepare full comment compilations [2.1.11 o Preparation of summary report [2.1.11 o Presentation to partners [2.1.11 o Integration with initial Framework vision and strategies [2.1.11 • Round 2 stakeholder engagement planning and preparation [2.1.2] o Final online survey design [2.1.21 o Phase design and material preparation [2.1.2] ■ Information boards ■ Individual participant packages ■ Directions for meeting hosts o Continued sharing of engagement invitations and coaching [2.1.2] o Review and refinement of messages and invitation process [2.1.2] o Maintenance and monitoring of submissions [2.1.2] • Round 2 stakeholder engagement execution o Facilitation of in-person events [2.1.2] o Monitoring of online survey [2.1.2] • Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o Press release #2 [1.51 o Engagement Round Talking Points [1.51 Next 30 days • Round 2 stakeholder engagement execution [2.1.2] Framework 2030 Project Update Page 2 of 5 o Continued sharing of engagement invitations and coaching [2.1.2] o Maintenance and monitoring of submissions [2.1.2] o Work session with Partnership [2.1.2] 30-90 days • Round 2 stakeholder final engagement reporting [2.1.1] o Preparation of summary report [2.1.1] o Compilation assembly o Presentation to partners [2.1.1] • Round 3 Stakeholder engagement planning [2.1.3] o Round 3 definition and planning [2.1.3] • Project communications and outreach planning [1.5] o Press release #3 [1.5] Component 3: Analysis This phase includes data collection and analysis of existing conditions, opportunities, and challenges. Completed • Baseline conditions and trends analysis [3.1] o Plan audit and review [3.1] o Policy matrix [3.1] o Research and analysis along three tracks (demographics, economics, and place -based conditions) [3.1] o Factbook Briefings completed [3.1] o Briefing of Partners during April 30 session, see meeting Presentation, with Briefing highlights starting on page 7 [3.1] • People / Demographics Analysis [3.3] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.3] o Sharing of initial findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.3] • Prosperity / General economic and personal prosperity analysis [3.3] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.3] o Sharing of initial findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.3] • Place Analysis o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.3] o Sharing of initial findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.3] • Market Area Analysis [3.3] o Sharing of initial findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.3] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.3] • Economic Performance Analysis [3.3] o Sharing of initial findings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.3] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.3] Framework 2030 Project Update Page 3 of 5 o Final assessment of economic development ecosystem [3.3] o Information interviews [3.3] • Growth Management and Land Use Analysis [3.2] o Research and analysis process and outline [3.2] o Policy matrix [3.1] o Focused Planning Area consolidated zoning, development character, future land use mapping [3.2] o Growth capacity analysis [3.2] o Sharing of deep -dive briefings with Liaison Team then Partnership [3.2] o Refinement, focus and key questions (engagement integration) [3.2] • Baseline Analysis Summary Infographic [3.3] 30-90 days • Target analysis based on engagement round 2 [3.2] Component 4: Framework Development This includes developing the elements of the draft and final Planning Framework as well as an implementation strategy. Completed • Framework development [4.1] o Initial concept development and discussion [4.1] o Discussion with partners outline for Framework development [4.1] Next 30 days • Framework development [4.1] o Refinement of concept based on round 2 [4.1] o Continued coordination with Liaison Team on topics and direction [4.1] o Work session with Partnership [2.1.2] 30-90 days • Draft of final framework [4.2] o Prepare detailed content outline [4.2] o Prep report template [4.2] • Prepare Action Plan [4.3] o Draft and share [4.3] o Share and revise action set [4.3] First Last Affiliation Position Email Framework 2030 Project Update Page 4 of 5 Kyle May Planning NEXT Project Consultant kyle(cDplanning-next.com Anne Carroll Carroll, Franck & Assoc Process consultant carrfran(cDgmail.com, 651-690-9162 Marc Schneider Sherburne County Liaison Team lead Marc.Schneider(@co.sherburne.mn.us 763-442-1285 Framework 2030 Project Update Page 5 of 5 Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership Workshop Date: 22 October 2020 7:30-9:00 am, Sherburne County Government Center, Maple Room <under COVID-19, meetings are either in-person or virtual; see Agenda for dial -in information> Introduction 1. Welcome, Partnership introductions, housekeeping 2. FHWA/MnDOT presentation and discussion Past and current regional studies, planning efforts u. State and federal funding outlook c Realities of corridor planning MEPA/NEPA process Considerations, options As usual for CMRP workshops, presentation is recorded and notes aren't taken There are 7 Q&A breaks in the presentation Everyone will be muted until these breaks Hold your questions until the breaks or Use the chat function; put ??? before your Ll_���� ts Chat question and facilitator will address at breaks Presentation + speaker notes will be posted on website Recording will be posted on website For clarity and accuracy, Q&A sections will be cut from the recording Q&A content will be organized, clarified, expanded as needed, and inserted into the recording as new slides with no audio Claudia Dumont, MnDOT Project Manager, MnDOT District 3 E-mail: claudia.dumont@state.mn.us Philip Forst, Federal Highway Administration Environmental Specialist E-mail: phil.forst@dot.gov Past, current regional studies, planning efforts 1. Past and current regional studies, planning efforts 2. State and federal funding outlook 3. Realities of corridor planning 4. MEPA/NEPA process 5. Considerations, options 2017-18 Transportation Study Provided valuable information on traffic movements, volumes, projected volumes Identified potential corridors from a traffic perspective only Examined if -then scenarios for shifting traffic off TH 25 Transportation study is only one data set needed for decisions Regional decisions must address bigger -picture land use planning, and social, economic, and environmental factors Planning studies/Framework 2030 Enable region to define needs Framework 2030 defines common vision and strategies for regional planning and economic development, and steps to collectively advance those In contrast, MEPA/NEPA process Defines the transportation issues, needs, and infrastructure needed to support land use and economic development plan (vehicles, bikes/peds, transit, etc.) Note: Need/desire for economic development is not sufficient "purpose and need" for the NEPA process. NEPA can be a tool to define and address the transportation performance problems impeding an established land use and economic development plan from adequately functioning. Factbook data: potential source for possible later transportation studies New / stronger regional relationships Defines and agrees on: Relevant, aspirational vision for the region Regional strategies for land use, economic growth, and interconnections Overarching regional economic and land use strategy that combines the plans of Partner communities into a consolidated future land use diagram Implementation recommendations that build on the region's challenges, opportunities, and capacities Positions the Partnership to collectively address regional challenges and opportunities Question: We did the traffic study in 2017-18, with the traffic changes due to COVID, would a new study be in order, or beneficial? Answer (MnDOT): Right now we're experiencing some weird things in our entire transportation system with people working at home. We expect it to rebound over time and those traffic numbers in 2017-18 will be good again -- it will just take awhile for the numbers to go back up. Those numbers should be updated at some point, but I don't think there's going to be a huge change. Question: How far did the 94/10 study get in the process? Answer (MnDOT): It got all the way through. We have a signed EIS, but we don't have funds for construction. Follow up about what happened with the lawsuit: Nothing. It became a non -issue because we didn't have funding for the physical construction. Without funding, it became moot. State and federal funding outlook 1. Past and current regional studies, planning efforts 2. State and federal funding outlook 3. Realities of corridor planning 4. MEPA/NEPA process 5. Considerations, options Available Funding Isn't Meeting Projected Needs $45 $40 $5 $0 $25 $20 $ 15 10 $5 $0 MnDOT Forecast Revenues 2018 - 2037 $Billions ■feeds ■ Revenue ■ Gap MnDOT bonds have 20 -year payback MnDOT policy limits debt service on trunk highway bonds to 20% of annual MnDOT revenues FY 2020 debt service was $213 million, which is 14-15% of annual revenues; this pays off bonds from 2000, and pays down later bonds FY 2023 debt service will be $250 million The real cost of bonding: $100 million in bonds sold today will cost $150 million by the time the debt service is paid Debt service limits constrain future MnDOT spending Learn more: Download Complete Financial Snapshot, Feb 2020 Source web page: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/funding/ • While total revenue is projected to increase, inflation decreases buying power $1,600 WN $1,200 I 11,000 $200 ■ Projected Reven uo ■ Projected Pu rnh a 5 i ng Power Adj u 5ted for I n fl ation 2018 201? 2020 20'1 2Y'1 2•323 2.72.1 2025 2026 2027 2029 2029 2030 2031 2032 2433 2034 2035 2036 2037 Question: When MnDOT spoke with this group in 2017-18, you mentioned MnDOT's focus was on maintaining existing infrastructure, not new infrastructure. Has that changed at all? Answer (MnDOT): No, it hasn't. Question: As we're talking about new infrastructure here, what does that mean in MnDOT terms? Answer (MnDOT): The bottom line is that any funding for this new connection would have to be local, because we just don't have the revenues to fund something like a new corridor. Question: When a bonding bill is passed and individual projects are put in there, does that basically force MnDOT's hand to reallocate funds differently from what you have in your needs assessment? Answer (MnDOT): In some cases that's correct. In the current bonding bill (passed by the MN Legislature just last week in special session) there was some money allocated to study Highway 10 in the Wadena area. We don't have an extra $40-50 million in our budget to build a project there so we are not sure what's going to happen -- we're trying to sort that out. It also depends on the source of the bonds. Trunk highway bonds are a direct hit to MnDOT's budget. General obligation (G.O.) bonds are from the general fund and have a different payback. Continued on next page Question: How do the federal BUILD funds and other grants work? Aren't some of those earmarked for particular projects? Answer (MnDOT): Yes, that's correct. In the last several years I've submitted three federal BUILD -type grant proposals for the I-94 corridor; we weren't successful in any of those. Federal grants are only a small piece of what's needed to complete a project. Using the $25 million example for the project noted earlier, if you get a grant for that much you still have to find funds for the rest of the project, and those would have to come from another source -- they wouldn't come from MnDOT. Question: Is it correct that if a MnDOT project gets federal 3UILC grant it forces MnDOT's hand to reallocate those funds, not necessarily based on need, but rather on the fact that you got either state bonding money or federal BUILD grants? Answer (MnDOT): That's correct Question: How would that kind of (grant -based) process work, under what conditions or circumstances, any recent examples, and so on? Answer (MnDOT): MnDOT has a Corridors of Commerce program. The legislature made bonding dollars available for projects that fit the C of C criteria. The 94 expansion between St Michael and Albertville got some of those funds. The funds weren't quite enough to fully fund that project, so the district had to defer some other projects in order to pull funds forward to make that happen. We were just informed that the Highway 23 North gap between Richmond and Paynesville (which was a District 8 project out of the Willmar office) is short $12-13 million and now they're saying, Well, we applied for the project, but it's in your district so you (District 3) have to find the money. District 3 doesn't have it, so we'll have to defer projects here in our district -- pavement, safety, intersection improvements -- to make up those gaps. Our revenues are fixed except for these special programs that get launched through bonding efforts or if specific federal grants would come in like a grant. Continued on next page Comment: When some projects pop up and MnDOT has to find the money by taking it from another project, it's not a win-win scenario by any means. We as elected officials have to be willing to fund these needs, and talk with the public about this. They understand -- they want their roads to be in good shape, they want their commute time to be less. And without funding the needs, it's going to be very challenging; it's not fair to ask other entities to give up their funding to fund another project, because they're all important. 100 75 so 5 0 -5 -50 -75 -100 -125 -150 Federal Highway Trust Fund revenues come from federal gas taxes, which are dropping; absent an infusion from other sources, funds won't be available 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 Source: The Highway Trust Fund and Treatment of Surface Transportation in the Budget. Congressional Budget Office, January 2020 Graph below shows declining availability of federal funds for highway and bridge projects, nationally "Advanced construction funds" are state/local costs that are eligible for federal funds, but for which no federal funds are currently available 70 $60 $50 a a° $40 c 0 $30 $20 $10 $0 Primate & other Funds 1 Local Funds State Funds Advanced Construction Funds Federal Funds Sources: American Road and Transportation Builders Association and Federal Highway Administration Continued on next page Question: Are the one-time BUILD grants outside of these federal funds (from the previous slide)? Answer (FHWA): Yes, the BUIL grants are outside the federal funds (red bars from previous slide). BUILD grants came out of the general fund. If you look back at the USDOT discretionary grant programs over time, you'll see the funding source is a mixed bag. Some discretionary grant programs used dollars from the general fund whereas other grant programs used federal Highway Trust Fund dollars. • Follow up question: So the previous graph doesn't include all federal funds, just the majority? • Answer (FHWA): Correct, the red bars reflect a majority of the federal funds -- the value of the federal formula funds plus the value of any discretionary grant program that used Highway Trust Fund dollars. The INFRA discretionary grant program and the bridge bundling program used Federal Highway Trust Fund dollars. The TIGER and BUILD discretionary grant programs used general fund dollars. Follow up: It seems like the trend going forward is sort of a money grab from different pots, while in the past you could count on the Highway Trust Fund as the primary source. Answer (FHWA): That's correct. Unless there's a change in something like the federal gas tax or a regular series of infusions from the General Fund, we would anticipate this downward trend continuing not only in the Highway Trust Fund balance, but also in its purchasing power (as was explained for MnDOT funds). Question: Are these issues related to what we hear about there being a huge national need for much more infrastructure investment? Answer (FHWA): Over the years, FHWA has begun advocating for a performance-based approach to the condition of the transportation system, in part because the trends were becoming apparent -- so we're advocating for good system condition and reliability. The federal aid highway program has not taken away the ability to do capacity expansion, but we have encouraged more focus on the system being in good repair, and a performance-based approach to solutions that make the dollars stretch as far as they can while providing adequate system performance. Answer (MnDOT): We've been building highways and bridges for a very long time, and a lot of them are nearing the end of their useful lifespans. Parts of the Interstate system were built in the 1970s, and at 50 years old they will need significant repairs. With declining federal and state funding plus inflation, we have some real problems facing us in the future. Question: What I'm seeing and hearing is that, as elected officials, when we look at these downward funding trends, without going back and advocating for increases in federal and state gas taxes, it's going to continue to be a challenge. Expecting this all to fix itself without being willing to fund the needs ... we're all leaving [federal and state transportation agencies] short of funding that you need to do your jobs. What kind of increase in gas tax are we talking about that would begin to make progress in our highway system and for our state. Answer (MnDOT): MnDOT leadership is running scenarios about we could do with increases, but the problem isn't just the gas tax and license tab sales. Cars are becoming much more fuel efficient and the vehicle trend is away from fossil fuel, so we need to find other ways to fund transportation other than relying on the gas tax. Follow up comment: We need to be on top of that as well -- also with cars that are getting gas mileage -- the whole system needs a good look. We as electeds have to be willing to advocate for what the needs are to continue to make progress. Question: Is MnDOT capable of using public-private partnerships for projects? Answer (MnDOT): Yes. It's something that our management has been promoting, however it's hard to come up with those types of projects because they tend to be very focused in a specific area. We had one instance in the state where a large company contributed toward the construction of an interchange because it provided access to their site. As far as the freeway system or other roads, I think you'd be looking at a toll system, and we haven't had much interest in that in this state. Continued on next page Question: Is it safe to say that we, as units of government, have failed to budget properly to resolve both growth and maintenance of existing systems. These charts and projections seem untenable when combined with revenue sources. Answer (MnDOT): Yes. You nailed it. It's a lot more exciting to have funding for a new project than maintain something you already have. Further MnDOT clarification about who owns/maintains something with private funding: It would go back to MnDOT because you couldn't expect a company to have the resources to plow or maintain a ramp, bridge, etc. -- they would have contributed something toward it, not fully funded it themselves. Follow-up participant clarification: So similar to a business building on a road and they have to build in turn lanes to enhance the current road to meet their business needs, they don't own the road but they do help pay for some of the upgrades. MnDOT: Correct. Realities of corridor planning 1. Past and current regional studies, planning efforts 2. State and federal funding outlook 3. Realities of corridor planning 4. MEPA/NEPA process 5. Considerations, options Successful corridor projects with clearly defined needs State and federal funding provided during decades of huge transportation investments TH 610, 11 mi: studies began in the 1970s, construction began in the 1980s with projected completion c. 2025 TH 371, 5.2 mi: Studies began in the 1970s; completed, including bridge, in TH 15, 9.2 mi: Studies began in the 1970s; completed in 1995 These state/federally funded corridor projects made connections to regional networks Carlo: • � ,Staten c:sego , ma nit Ramsey AI 'z Ham =oke Albe.rty a Andover c5 St M &ael fir. r Rogers -t; B line ... �` Coon Reids, � Maple Grove, MN 6}0 f b fiifo reenfld ,`. rli _ �kf4rd, Corcoran E d Brooklyn Park ,, r _ Maple Grove - shorevl -Ali ` +nTH 6101 -. W -Twin Citidsetrol ! _ Rosevill _Minneapolis, I+ r =1 Baxter, MN 56425 Hrainerd TS a -- I TH 371, Brainerd Minnesota 371 ❑ bypass Unsuccessful / stalled 1-94/TH 10: started in 1997 to improve safety and support regional needs; completed EIS and identified preferred corridor in 2007; lawsuit by local property owners stalled project; MnDOT recently notified jurisdictions of no foreseeable funding, freeing land for other uses TH 41 river crossing: started in 2002 to improve safety, allow travel during flooding, and support regional needs; multijurisdictional partnership established common goals, completed EIS, and identified preferred corridor in 2015; no foreseeable funding St. Cloud Area Planning Organization, new river crossing: pushed since late 1990s; no studies due to competing regional needs Conclusion: Even with demonstrated need and completed process, there are no funding guarantees Only foreseeable source of funds for this corridor is local Total costs for a future river crossing corridor are likely $135-$165 million In today's dollars, based on per -mile costs for similar corridors Using estimated corridor lengths from 2017-18 transportation study (2.5-5 miles) Actual costs depend on numerous, unknown factors Costs would include multiple studies, engineering, land acquisition, and construction of roadway, bridge, ramps/access to local roads Costs are driven by final corridor route and roadway/bridge specifications Other unknowns include environmental issues, landowner impacts, land acquisition costs, archeological discoveries, geotechnical issues, legal challenges, etc. Requirements for CMRP to proceed Generational commitment Powerful and sustained regional collaboration and planning, strong and persistent public trust, and substantial investments of financial and political capital $1-3 million for planning + a reasonable path through the state/federal Question: With the need to focus on regional significance for these large corridors. Would it be accurate to say that focusing on the improvement of commercial freight traffic would be a more viable angle for state and federal partnerships vs. local traffic solutions? Answer (MnDOT): I wouldn't focus it solely on freight, because you have lots of residents in your area, you are already working on a regional solution, and freight is just one component. You need to focus on the long term. You may get a freight facility and then they might go out of business, so you don't want to "hang your hat" on just one thing. You want to have that regional or more "global" perspective. Question: If there's $1-3 million for the planning and EIS and one was already completed on the 1-94/10 study, would that have to be redone? Answer (MnDOT): That project (94/10) happened so long ago the environmental documents aren't valid anymore. We would need to revisit all the assumptions that were made and see if it still made sense to fund this corridor. Traffic patterns have changed. I know that if you're using the Google maps app in your car, it will route you through Monticello instead of on TH 24 -- so for all practical purposes the 1-94/10 study is not valid anymore. Question: For the bonding bill just signed that includes bonding for the Becker Industrial Park, that is projected to be one of the largest industrial parks that I'm aware of in the state. It's a great opportunity for our region and for the state. It's going to change the traffic patterns, along with our being the fastest-growing area, I get concerned that we're not putting enough emphasis on the need to address what these growth patterns are going to do for our area. It will increase truck traffic and residential traffic because more people are moving out here. How does that change MnDOT's thoughts on this just being a local issue? Answer (MnDOT): When you mention that the Becker area is poised to have one of the largest industrial areas in the state, that really highlights the need to do good land use planning -- because the land use planning feeds into the transportation needs, which we can pull into those studies and figure out the best solution for this area. So MnDOT is aware of the changes going on, but a lot more information is needed before any decisions are made and anything moves forward. Continued on next page Question: Could you draw parallels or comparisons between the 1-94 efforts of that committee, and if there were any lessons learned 5-6 years ago when it wasn't even on MnDOT's radar to go to 6 lanes and now look what we have? What can be learned from that process that can be applied to this situation? Answer (MnDOT): Regarding number of lanes, there was a study done back in the 1990s showing the need for additional capacity on 1-94, and actually that showed the need for 5 lanes between Maple Grove and Rogers, and we're actually just now getting a 4th. For extending capacity out to the west, the 1-94 Coalition had worked toward expansion for quite awhile, and the piece from St Michael to Albertville was funded through the Corridors of Commerce program, so that was a special allocation. The section from Rogers to St Michael was an earlier bonding bill for expansion. The section from Monticello to Clearwater was different because we don't have the same capacity needs, but needed to maintain 2 lanes of traffic in each direction during construction. Because of the amount of temporary widening that would need to be done, it got a little bit political because it looks bad to build temporary widening and then tear it out and not give travelers that extra lane. So there were a lot of different factors at play in those projects, and they were also established transportation corridors. 1-94/10 stalled because of the budget that was required to deliver it. One of the most recent estimates -- from a number of years ago -- was about $132 million, which with inflation would be about $200M, and we just don't have funding available for that long of a connection any more. Follow up question: Would it be plausible to think that if the need were demonstrated -- it is a state need -- and if this group stayed together with the same focus the 1-94 coalition had, that politically enough pressure could be brought to bear to create legislation or a bonding bill? There's obviously huge state benefit here and the locals need to support it as well. If this group stays and works together to create that kind of momentum, that we could accomplish the same thing? Answer (MnDOT): It's possible. The 1-94/10 project had a different focus. That was trying to carry trucks and recreational traffic from the Metro to northern Minnesota, and provide freight connections for those really long trips -- because TH 24 was very congested -- and still is. But businesses along TH 24 didn't want to lose the income generated from the people coming through, but they also didn't want the traffic. This is still an issue. MEPA/NEPA process 1. Past and current regional studies, planning efforts 2. State and federal funding outlook 3. Realities of corridor planning 4. MEPA/NEPA process 5. Considerations, options Path to decide MEPA/NEPA: Minnesota National Environmental Policy Act what, if Studies are sequential anything, is built Note: Process requirements, details, and timing depend on the project; this is a summary and should not be relied on for any formal action or decision Land Use Planning Study y Time: 2-3 years Cost: $200K -400K F- p Planning and Environmental Linkage Study Time: 1-3 years Cost: $200K -800K Tier I Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Time: 2 years Cost: $1.5-2.5M 0 Tier II nvironmental Document(s) Time: 1-3 years Cost: Scope - dependent yl LJ Physical Construction Time: Scope - dependent Cost: Scope - dependent O Land Use Planning Study What do I get from a land use planning study? A common regional vision, strategies, and implementation plans for multi- generational development with minimal waste If jurisdictions align local plans accordingly, the result is a mutually beneficial regional land use plan How does it feed the next step in the process? Assists in defining traffic analysis zones Anticipates origins -destinations What does it take to move to the next step? Resolving differences and conflicting stakeholder priorities A regional land use plan that all buy into Total time expended from start of land use study: 1-2 years Anticipated cash outlay since start of land use study: $0.2-0.4M When finished, Framework 2030 positions the Partnership to align local plans, which creates a solid basis for defining regional transportation needs ❑2 Planning and Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study Lifespan: 5 years after FHWA final concurrence What is it? Any type of transportation planning study conducted at corridor or subarea level that links planning information directly to NEPA, with FHWA involvement Most helpful when: Project funding is reasonably expected, problem is not well defined, and solutions are not identified PEL studies identify: Transportation problems to be addressed + evaluation criteria Environmental setting and preliminary impact assessment Stakeholder/public/resource agency concerns Initial alternatives to be vetted, followed by a reasonable set of alternatives to move forward into NEPA -- no preferred alternative is identified PEL studies do not: Guarantee federal funds Reduce the level of NEPA analysis required Total time expended from start of land use study: 2-5 years Anticipated cash outlay since start of land use study: $0.4-1.2M -3, Example of PEL-level of detail for a corridor 2- A �X i 4>" 1 �' ❑2 Planning and Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study Lifespan: 5 years after FHWA final concurrence How is a PEL different than a Feasibility or Corridor Study? PEL incorporates NEPA principles and the information is readily transferable into a later, more streamlined NEPA process At defined milestones, FHWA issues concurrence Develops environmental data to screen alternatives based on environmental laws and transportation needs Uses an endorsed framework to coordinate technical work such as travel demand, purpose and need development, public and resource agency outreach, and more Total time expended from start of land use study: 2-5 years Anticipated cash outlay since start of land use study: $0.4-1.2M N Tier I Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Lifespan: 3 years after Record of Decision issued What is it? Study that broadly analyzes transportation and environmental issues Continues broad engagement from PEL How does it feed the next step in the process? Tier I EIS results in a preferred build *corridor* (or no -build option) Provides environmental clearance for corridor location and access point locations (not for physical construction) What does it take to move to the next step? Adequate public and resource agency engagement Fulfilling MEPA and NEPA requirements. Issuance of a Record of Decision (ROD) by the lead federal agency Total time expended from start of land use study: 4-7 years Anticipated cash outlay since start of land use study: $1.9-3.7M 0 Tier II Environmental Document(s) Lifespan: 3 years after decision document issued What is it? Study that analyzes transportation and environmental issues for specific designs; requires construction funding to be reasonable foreseeable Continues broad engagement from Tier How does it feed the next step in the process? Selects a preferred alternative for physical construction Provides environmental clearance for physical construction What does it take to move to the next step? Lead federal and state agencies issue decision documents State plans updated, with dedicated project funds Project proposer obtains all necessary permits Let contract for physical construction Total time expended from start of land use study: 5-10 years Anticipated cash outlay since start of land use study: $2.4-5.3M Further elaboration (FHWA): For the Planning and Environmental Linkage (PEL) study, once it's completed and receives FHWA concurrence, has a 5 -year life span. So it's an opportunity to apply NEPA principles in a very structured framework -- so the Partnership can work together, engaging the public and resource agencies, and have a lower level of investment than jumping into a Tier I or II EIS, while still making progress on transportation needs, considering the pros and cons of various corridors, and determining which corridors are unreasonable (clearly would not meet "purpose and need" -- it wouldn't have the chance of moving the performance numbers in the right direction to address the defined transportation problems). Question: In looking at this project, would the work we are doing now with Framework 2030 be considered pre -step 1 in this process? Answer (FHWA): Effectively, yes, because Framework 2030, combined with updates from the Partners to their land use plans and having that commonly agreed to land use vision, would allow the definition of traffic generators. From there, we can see how those traffic generators affect the existing network, define transportation problems, and have a jumping off point to define and address those problems. Further clarification: Aligning land uses across jurisdictions to create a commonly agreed -to land use plan is required to generate good traffic numbers and traffic modeling -- which we need to see the appropriate range of solutions and work together to get to that one solution to the corridor location that will be workable for all. Example (Anne Carroll): For my work on TH 41 in the Shakopee area, one of the things they did, similarly to CMRP, is form a coalition to resolve hugely complex issues across federal and state regulations, which they accomplished because of the relationships they had created. In spite of clearly identified need and federal and state approval, in the end there was still no money. Clarification (FHWA): The 1-94/10 project was a Tier 11; the Highway 41 project in Shakopee was a Tier I Continued on next page Reminder/clarification that this is a "corridor" project, not a bridge project. Using the 2017 initial traffic study as a baseline, the corridor could be 2.5-5 miles long, including on/off access and connections to local streets. Question: When we first started this process I don't think the Becker industrial park potential was even in the thought process, though we all knew we were trying to grow our commercial and industrial base. This is a big deal for the industrial park and what Becker is going to be able to do now. Is there anything there that changes what we're needing to address with our traffic patterns and so on. I am concerned that we need to take this seriously to be successful. Answer (FHWA): As you go through the spectrum of studies and see the number of years at the bottom of each slide, at each stage we use the best available information. So as traffic changes locally, if you were to go through that entire spectrum or only part, one of the things that should be asked at every stage is whether that traffic has changed -- whether it be numbers, origins and destinations, or both. It's important to update the studies to be sure that what you have on the table is a viable solution. These are living documents that are updated as regions and projects change. However, traffic numbers are not generally updated in advance of seeing the actual network effect. We typically use the best available data at the time from the traffic counts. Sometimes a sensitivity analysis might be done to see how things might change in given scenarios, but we typically use the actual number, then forecast those numbers 20 years out. Elaboration (Anne Carroll): One of the things that can bring this kind of effort to its knees is major conflict among jurisdictions. Building consensus, relationships, public support and trust is absolutely essential. The challenge is financial; with the bleak federal and state projections, it's essential to understand those from the beginning and plan accordingly and intentionally. Considerations, options 1. Past and current regional studies, planning efforts 2. State and federal funding outlook 3. Realities of corridor planning 4. MEPA/NEPA process 5. Considerations, options Short/mid-term options -- Framework 2030 and your work together as a Partnership position you well to: Work toward a regional vision and continue engaging stakeholders Collaborate to achieve your land use and economic development priorities Find short/mid-term solutions to regional transportation challenges, such as local road system upgrades that address regional needs, reduce current problems, and complement a possible future river crossing Roles and responsibilities if a corridor is pursued: As public agencies, MnDOT and FHWA staff will continue working with the Partnership as you consider options -- understanding that MnDOT's priority is maintaining the integrity of existing facilities vs. system expansion MnDOT would address implications for other roadways (1-94, TH 10, TH 25, etc.) Other relevant agencies would be involved, such as US Army Corps of Engineers, US Fish & Wildlife, Mn DNR; state, federal, and Tribal agencies for historical and archaeological clearances, etc. Question: How could the Partnership prevent the stalling or failure of this project -- after hearing about those other projects that went through the process in good faith, got to the end, and then were dead. Certainly you can't remove all risk, can't eliminate all the unknowns, but what are optimal pathways forward for the Partnership? Answer (FHWA): Thinking about the spectrum of studies and understanding that the ones we execute are situation -dependent, the important thing is to keep doing what you've been doing. That's been a challenge with some of the groups on other projects we've mentioned today -- they hadn't all gotten together for that common vision, they hadn't arrived at a land use plan that was mutually viable. The important thing is to keep going on that front, keep working together -- it's a living conversation that we have here, and part of that is, what do you want to accomplish for your reputational and financial outlay for these studies? That, relative to what you see as your funding realities. Those are not the "be all, end all," but they can help inform a discussion with the parties at the table today about the right mix of studies. That feeds a discussion of the pros and cons, as opposed to jumping to a single answer. Further clarification that many of these studies have both legal and practical expiration dates, which informs discussion of start and end dates for these, plus a realistic look at where the funds are coming from -- then deciding how to proceed. It is so important to bring many jurisdictions and public perspectives to the table so you minimize the surprises. There are many unknowns you can't address in advance (like what's under ground that's not recorded), but you can listen to and try and address priorities and conflicts, build on commonalities, find agreement and leverage that. Continued on next page Question: What are the top 2-3 factors considered when deciding on the location of a new river crossing? Answer (FHWA): For a NEPA process today, when alternatives are being defined and vetted, a lot comes down to how well the transportation problem is defined, then balancing the acceptable performance of a given alternative against the social, economic, and environmental impacts. Those help define what a location is most viable option -- so not just best performance, but what performance can you achieve for something you can actually afford. Further clarification that route decisions lean into land use, and doing things in order. So going from Framework 2030 into a deeper and more intense land use conversation among the jurisdictions that takes awhile -- then you have clarity around intended future land use at a regional level. Then the transportation analyses work from that regional land use. Question: What percentage of travel/traffic do you think would be reduced by adding another river crossing? Answer (MnDOT): We have no way of forecasting that until land uses are well defined, and even then it's just a forecast. Continued on next page Comment: When we ask how we get to success and what to avoid, we (Wright Co planning) have land use plans, we have a Monticello orderly annexation area, we have a transition area, 1-94 and 10 are established, we have a Highway 55 corridor that was going to be improved and we have a mapping ordinance on that -- but it's not happening, and I've had to tell property owners for numerous years now what they can and cannot do with their property. I'm glad we did not have the (1-94)/Hwy 10 corridor that's now not taking place -- it sounds like for this transportation issue we need to get this land use stuff resolved, done, and agreed upon so we can focus on the environmental planning, and financing, the bonding, whatever the processes are done. I can't speak for the County board members, but as an office we don't have an appetite for a large area that might have extra restrictions or a future potential area when we don't have clear-cut goals or consensus on where this crossing is going to take place. My impression was that it was the Monticello area; if it's now going out to the Silver Creek or Clearwater area again, I don't know how we get this figured out. Response (Anne Carroll): You raise exactly the points that have to be made. Consensus must be reached on regional land uses among the jurisdictions (different from a formal, cross -jurisdictional agreement) and where they abut -- then going through a study process before any commitments are made on routes. When route decisions are made through a collaborative process, they aren't imposed on anyone. Follow-up comment: So maybe the two years of meetings on route consensus were putting the cart before the horse; it was pretty clear there were limited options. Everyone only has so many resources; there can't be a multiyear conceptual land use discussion when patterns are established -- the river, I- 94, Highway 10, traffic studies, the cities are there, everyone has land use plans... agreements, consensus, building relationships, that's great this is coming out of that, but if that's the first step then it needs to be done. It can't go year after year after year. Response (Anne Carroll): That's the purpose of Framework 2030, which is yielding that cross - jurisdictional look at commonalities, conflicts, and a land use "framework" and the issues to be addressed in the next steps. Continued on next page Follow-up answer (MnDOT): It sounds like Wright County may have a better -defined land use plan, which is good. I think the issues in Sherburne County are much different and more fluid, especially with the amount of undeveloped land between Highway 10 and the river -- they have work to do to determine what their land use looks like and how the transportation network will serve that development. They have to get that done before we can talk about corridors. The corridors identified in the 2017-18 traffic studies were just what -if scenarios; there was no science or environmental review behind them -- just lines on paper. The reason they were focused on Monticello was only because the City was driving that study, and when they didn't like some of the options that were thrown out there, everything basically came to a halt. That's when everyone realized these issues were much bigger than the City, the work needed to include the cities across the river, and the corridor has to serve everybody and be mutually inclusive. So they brought in Anne Carroll as the process consultant and re-formed as the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership, changing its focus away from solely transportation to regional land use and economic development planning. The work on Framework 2030 has included a lot of basic self-discovery for the Partners. If you look at the Factbooks, they cover what our population looks like and where it's centered, here's where people are working and not working, where they're commuting, where there is developable land. So they've learned a lot about themselves as communities and as a region, which is necessary before they can decide what they want to look like in the future -- then determine how transportation supports that. They're doing great work, it's a long process, and you can't jump to those corridors because there was nothing behind them. Doing the transportation study before land use was sorted out was premature. The Partnership/ Framework 2030 has a well-defined geographic area and they're looking at issues within that. (FHWA) looks at this large defined area with multiple jurisdictions as regional, and as you saw with the funding projections and how few projects actually make it to physical construction, working together regionally for one desired outcome is your best chance to find a solution that works well for all of you. Even if it doesn't come to fruition, you still have a bigger -picture land use vision, goals, and strategies to help with your day-to-day activities. It's great that this group has come together and is doing useful work. Claudia Dumont, Project Manager MnDOT District 3 E-mail: Claudia. Dumont@state.mn.us Philip Forst, Environmental Specialist Federal Highway Administration E-mail: phil.forst@dot.gov