Loading...
Planning Commission Agenda 12-07-20211. Agenda Documents Documents: AGENDA.PCMEETING.120721.PDF ITEM 1 B.EXH A.070621.PCMINUTES.SPECIAL.PDF ITEM 1 B.EXH B.110121.PCMINUTES.PDF ITEM 2A.RUNNINGS PUD AMENDMENT.PDF ITEM 2B.TWIN PINES PUD PLAT.PDF ITEM 3A.113 W BROADWAY EDA ACQUISITION.PDF ITEM 3B.00ELLO EDA ACQUISITION.PDF ITEM 3C.APPOINTMENTS.PDF ITEM 3D.THEPOINTESCOMPASS.PDF ITEM 3E.CDD REPORT.PDF AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, December 7t", 2021 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, Alison Zimpfer, Eric Hagen and Teri Lehner Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Hayden Stensgard, and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Special Meeting Minutes —July 6, 2021 b. Regular Meeting Minutes —November 1, 2021 C. Citizen Comments D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda E. Consideration to approve agenda 2. Public Hearing A. Public Hearing — Consideration of an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for a Retail Building Expansion in the Central Community District (CCD) Applicant: JR & R II LLC B. Public Hearing — Consideration of Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat of Twin Pines Apartments, a 93-unit multi -family residential project in a B-4 (Regional Business) District Applicant: Kjellberg, Kent 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of Adopting Resolution PC-2021-050, a Resolution Finding that the Proposed Acquisition of Certain Land by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority is Consistent with the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan) B. Consideration of PC-2021-051, a Resolution Finding that the Proposed Acquisition of Certain Land (Parcels 213-100-151400 and 213-100-153100) by the City of Monticello is Consistent with the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan) C. Consideration of recommending appointments for expiring terms of Planning Commissioners Paul Konsor and Andrew Tapper D. Consideration to appoint a Planning Commission member to The Pointes at Cedar Compass Committee E. Consideration of the Community Development Director's Report 4. Added Items S. Adjournment MINUTES SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, July 6th, 2021- 7 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Council Present: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Sam Murdoff Commissioners Present: Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, Alison Zimpfer, Eric Hagen Staff Present: Rachel Leonard, Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman 1. Call to Order Paul Konsor called the Special Meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 7:24 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of a Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Proposal for a 200-Unit Multi -Family Residential Development Applicant: Baldur Real Estate, LLC Angela Schumann explained that earlier this spring, this development group submitted plans for a conceptual review of a townhome PUD that showed a 94-unit rental townhouse project on just under 10 acres along Edmonson Avenue NE. The proposed plan received a concept plan review in a joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting, and the applicants subsequently submitted materials for a Development Stage PUD and related approvals, which were to be considered in a public hearing on July 6th, 2021. During the interim period, the applicants decided that the townhouse project could not be completed successfully. Instead, they are seeking a new concept review of a multi -family project on the same general property (the westerly lot line has been adjusted slightly from the original request). As such, the developer and staff have worked to shift the July 6 meeting time from a Planning Commission review of the townhouse project to a joint City Council/Planning Commission discussion of the new multi -family project. Steve Grittman explained that the proposed project consists of 200 units —100 units in each of two buildings. The buildings are both "L"-shaped structures arrayed in the westerly portion of the site, with underground parking at one space per unit and surface parking of 1.25 spaces per unit. The complex would include a separate clubroom building, and likely other site amenities for the future tenants. It should be noted that staff has consistently supported the higher range of densities in the Chelsea Commons area to support business activity and maximize the contribution of those properties to the public infrastructure being constructed. The project area is uniquely situated to accommodate high densities, given the collector roadway status of all four boundaries of the project area. To this end, higher density development has generally been anticipated as the Chelsea Commons Small Area Plan continues its progress. Planning Commission Minutes (Special/Joint Meeting) —July 6th, 2021 Page 1 1 5 The project concept is still in its "first impression" stage. The petitioners have submitted a conceptual site plan and photo -renderings of other similar projects that the applicants would use as architectural models for this project. Naturally, additional detail will be added as the project proceeds to the Development Stage PUD submittal. The benefit of the Concept review at this stage is to provide feedback as to key elements the development team should plan for as they move to more detailed design. Staff suggests a number of items for discussion and detailed in the included report: • Building Layout 0 Building Architecture • Pedestrian Circulation • Parking Supply • Chelsea Common Impacts 0 Grading and Drainage Grittman reiterated that the purpose of the Concept Review is to provide strong guidance and feedback to the development team as they refine their project design and prepare for Development Stage PUD review. Commissioner Konsor stated that it makes sense to put the higher density on the ends. He noted that it would also support the larger project by developing the higher density residential first and would perhaps make more sense to build up the commercial once the residential is in place. He noted that because of the topography and the powerline, the developer is limited. Mark Welch of G Cubed Engineering reminded the group that this is in the early stages architecturally and adjustments could be made at a later date to better fit the needs of the surrounding area. Andrew Tapper asked for the anticipated rent price point. Mr. Welch said that he did not have anything official, but the developer will be looking at a starting rent of around $1,000 - $1,250. Shawn Weinand emphasized the quality of the proposed buildings and that exterior architecture design changes have been discussed with the architect. Mr. Weinand clarified that the fronts of both buildings face Edmonson Avenue. Paul Konsor said that he would like to see the buildings stand out more architecturally; the buildings proposed do not have a "wow" factor he is looking for. Mark Welch responded that he believed that once they have more ways to show the Planning Commission Minutes (Special/Joint Meeting) —July 6th, 2021 Page 2 1 5 exterior of the buildings rather than one preliminary drawing, it will help show the quality and the style. Charlotte Gabler asked how the citizens living in townhomes across the street are going to react to having a large building taking up much of their view to the north. Mr. Welch noted that the change in topography that will take place on the site during the construction of this project will change the way that this building is viewed by the surrounding parcels. Andrew Tapper asked how many residential units in this area will it take to make the project work as whole. Angela Schumann said that 865 units is the conceptual number used in the plan, although the financial analysis is on -going. Andrew Tapper and Charlotte Gabler are cautious at how successful the City will be at not only selling the idea to residents in Monticello, but also selling the individual units to potential new residents and retailers to fill space around this project. Paul Konsor asked about the idea of transitioning this project from an apartment complex to a townhome area. Shawn Weinand said that he would be concerned about the number of units that would take in order to reach the Small Area Plan's units per acre minimum. Charlotte Gabler asked about the potential for one building instead of having two. Mark Welch said that there was a discussion regarding one building on site, but conceptually it did not work. Eric Hagen mentioned that he was not in favor of the townhome idea, but more supportive of the apartment building plans. He also said that the apartment style adds more communal greenspace to the area, and is a good entry point for residents to utilize the proposed Chelsea Commons area. Shawn Weinand noted that this project will be developed in phases, so adjustments needed can be easily approached. Rachel Leonard mentioned that there is a lot of interest from multi -family developers to build throughout the community. This site specifically will benefit the developer and the City beyond another area in the city. Staff is committed to making areas like Block 52 and Chelsea Commons have that distinct appeal that is going to drive people to those areas. Eric Hagen emphasized the appeal that the proposed lake and trails features will add to this proposed development. Hagen also mentioned that he would be in favor of removing some of the parking space, provided the applicant can maintain that parking threshold required by the city. Planning Commission Minutes (Special/Joint Meeting) —July 6th, 2021 Page 3 1 5 Shawn Weinand said that the excessive parking space is for guest to visit residents in the buildings. Mark Welch said that there is the possibility of bringing down the parking per unit ration from 2.25:1 to 1.75:1. Eric Hagen asked if the proposal includes underground parking on site. Mark Welch confirmed. Andrew Tapper said he would rather see as many parking spaces on site as possible, in case there are issues with the smaller lot space and the need for plowing snow, there is room to maneuver. There could be potential for street parking during times of maintenance and that would not be safe given the location of the site. Paul Konsor said that he sees the excess parking being problem because people will park there, though they are not residents, to utilize the proposed park space. Andrew Tapper noted that apartment management will be available to police issues like the one Paul Mentioned. Sam Murdoff said that he does not have a problem with the density of the proposed buildings. Murdoff referenced the park in Maple Grove where there are taller buildings surrounding it, many as tall or taller than 3 stories. The project would be more appealing to him if the buildings had the ability to better screen the area from the commercial buildings behind them. If the lot were to be smaller than proposed, he would be in favor of that as well. That would provide more opportunity for more residential or commercial surrounding Chelsea Commons. Murdoff agreed with Paul Konsor in the fact there is too much open - space parking on site. Removing parking spaces could open opportunity for some commercial or more residential on site. He believes that the exterior of the apartment buildings could benefit from an update architecturally. Eric Hagen said that he agreed with everything Murdoff said, but there is difficulty in making an attempt to appeal to everyone's liking of the exterior of buildings. Mark Welch noted the entrance of the buildings and that the site layout appeals to them being offset on the buildings. He also mentioned that if the building were any higher than the proposed three -stories, the ratio of underground parking to units is difficult to achieve. Sam Murdoff said that he didn't believe the lack of every unit having an underground parking space is a problem. Mark Welch entertained the idea of having garages located on some of the proposed greenspace as an alternative. Paul Konsor said that he did like the look of the entrance provided. Mark Welch said that the plan is to provide more detailed depictions of the site plan in the near future. Mayor Lloyd Hilgart mentioned that he is in favor of this apartment building Planning Commission Minutes (Special/Joint Meeting) —July 6th, 2021 Page 4 1 5 proposal rather than the previous proposal with townhomes on this site. Mayor Hilgart does not see the height of the buildings as an issue, nor does he see the density of the buildings as an issue. He emphasized the importance of having high quality rental units in this area of Monticello. Angela Schumann listed the members of the City Council and Planning Commission for the record. Ms. Schumann also mentioned the public comment received by staff prior to the meeting from the Buchholz Development Group, and that it references their investment into the community, specifically Chelsea Commons, and also noted the 2020 City Housing Study. 4. Adjourn LLOYD HILGART MOVED TO ADJOURN THE SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION. ERIC HAGEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Planning Commission Chair Paul Konsor adjourned the meeting at 8:46 p.m. Recorder: Hayden Stensgard Approved: Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Planning Commission Minutes (Special/Joint Meeting) —July 6th, 2021 Page 5 1 5 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, November 1st, 2021 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Paul Konsor, Alison Zimpfer, Eric Hagen and Teri Lehner Commissioners Absent: Andrew Tapper Council Liaison Absent: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Steve Grittman (NAC), Hayden Stensgard, and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order Paul Konsor called the regular meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 6:20 B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Special Meeting Minutes —July 6. 2021 ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO TABLE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINTUES FROM JULY 6, 2021. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. b. Special Meeting Minutes — September 27, 2021 ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER 27, 2021. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. c. Regular Meeting Minutes — October S. 2021 ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER 27, 2021. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. C. Citizen Comments None D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda None E. Consideration to approve agenda ALISON ZIMPFER MOVED TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 1, 2021, PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. ERIC HAGEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. 2. Public Hearing A. Public Hearing — Consideration of request for Conditional Use Permit for Group Residential Facility, Multi -Family in an R-2 (Single and Two -Family) Residence District. Applicant: Kimber, James & Yassa City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the application and staff report to the Planning Commission and the public. The building that the group home is proposed to be in is zoned R-2 (Single and Two Family) under the City's zoning code. This district allows attached housing, which under state law, makes the district eligible for group home facilities with 7 to 16 residents. Grittman noted the recommendation to remove one of the two entry points to the site to limit congestion on Broadway Street. The applicant has informed staff that the driveways are important to this specific use as one of the entry points is elevated to maximize emergency services. Staff has since updated their report to find this request unnecessary. Staff also made the recommendation to maximize greenspace on the site reach 30% greenspace. If this were a new site that would be the minimum required. Staff received confirmation that the site currently has 26% greenspace. Since the request is an improvement to the existing condition, this is an allowed aspect of the site condition. Staff recommends approval of this conditional use permit with conditions provided in the staff report. Paul Konsor asked what the building is currently being used for. Ron Hackenmueller said that it is currently vacant. Steve Grittman added that the building used to be a funeral home. Paul Konsor asked if there is a necessity to calculate the staff on site regarding the living area minimums for residents. Steve Grittman said if they are a resident on -site, they would need to be counted in the calculations, but since it has been determined that the employees will be on shifts, this is not necessary. If there were plans for staff to be overnight residents, it would apply. Paul Konsor opened the public hearing. Diane Herbst of 301 Front Street asked if the applicant were to change the type of group home from senior living, would it have to be reapproved. Steve Grittman clarified that the conditional use permit is a request for specifically disabled adults and seniors. If this were to be changed it would require an amendment to the conditional use permit. Paul Konsor closed the public hearing segment of this item. There was minimal discussion among commissioners. All were in consensus that this is a good use and fit for the property. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-043, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GROUP RESIDENTIAL FACILITY, MULTI -FAMILY, IN AN R-2, SINGLE AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE, BASED ON THE FINDINGS SAID RESOLUTION WITH CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN EXHIBIT Z. ALISON ZIMPFER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. EXHIBIT Z CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GROUP RESIDENITAL FACILITY FOR UP TO 12 DISABLED ADULT SENIOR RESIDENTS IN AN R-2 DISTRICT 530 WEST BROADWAY The submitted site plan shall be modified to illustrate any possible reduction in impervious surfaces, and replacement with landscaped lawn and trees/shrubs. All applicable State licensing requirements for the proposed "group home" use shall be satisfied. Proof of State licensing shall be provided to the City prior to construction. Recommendations of the City Engineer. 4. Recommendations of Building Department staff. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Request for Amendment to Interim Use Permit to allow Extraction/Excavation of Materials in the B-3 (Highway Business) and B-4 (Regional Business) Districts Applicant: City of Monticello Steve Grittman provided an overview of the application and staff report to the Planning Commission and the public. The amendment is directly related to an expansion of allowances for materials to be removed on the eligible site. As this is an interim use permit, it was granted to operate through to the fall of 2022 with the first phase of construction. With this amendment, it would further extend the interim use permit to the end of 2023. If the completion of the excavation is not completed by that time, the City would have to return to the Planning Commission with an amendment to the date. Grittman noted that there would be no traffic due to this IUP on School Boulevard or Edmonson Avenue. Staff's recommendation is to approve the amendment to the interim use permit. Paul Konsor asked if this amendment were to be approved, would Dundas Road be removed. Steve Grittman replied that to complete the full excavation of the proposed location, Dundas Road would eventually have to be removed; this approval does not grant for that removal, which is a separate process Eric Hagen asked if the removal of Dundas Road would be one the last things removed from the site. Steve Grittman said that it will be based on the contractor's construction schedule. Paul Konsor opened the public hearing, hearing no comment, Paul Konsor closed the public hearing segment of this item. Steve Grittman noted that the City Engineer asked to share with the Planning Commission that Minnesota Department of Transportation review the request, and that there were no objections from the State. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-044, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR EXCAVATION OF AGGREGATE MATERIAL, BASED ON THE FINDINGS SAID RESOLUTION WITH CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN EXHIBIT Z. ALISON ZIMPFER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. EXHIBIT Z Interim Use Permit Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 71h Addition and Outlot C, Monticello Business Center, and unplatted lands PIDs: 155227000010; 155098000030; and 155230000001 1. Inbound trucks to the excavation site utilize the haul route shown in the original IUP submission materials, along Highway 25, to Dundas Road, to Cedar Street, to the site. 2. A return route utilizes Cedar Street to Chelsea Road, to Trunk Highway 25, subject to further review, and amendment if required by the City. 3. The contractor conducts only aggregate resource extraction, and attendant grading activities associated with that activity, and no other uses under this permit. 4. The operation extends from the date of City Council authorization, including any other permitting required to initiate the project, until December 31, 2023. Any further excavation would require an amended IUP during this timeframe, or a new IUP if activity under this permit has terminated. 5. Topsoil pile location approved by the property and seeded and stabilized per the City Engineer's requirements. 6. The operation is limited to 7:OOa — 7:OOp, Monday through Saturday for the period noted in condition 4. 7. The contractors enter into an agreement securing the conditions of the permit as described in the application, including setback, and the City Council's approval of the IUP and provides any securities required by that agreement. 8. Comments and conditions identified by the City Engineer, and other City 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of Tabled Item - Consideration of a request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition for Monticello Meadows, a proposed 200-unit multi -family residential project in a B-4 (Regional Business) District. Applicant: Baldur Real Estate, LLC Steve Grittman provided an overview of the application and staff report to the Planning Commission and the public. Grittman clarified this item was tabled last month due to evolving plans and design work. Much of the changes were to meet the City's expectations and goals for the site. The applicant has since submitted a limited set of revised plans. Grittman noted the added landscaping and changes to the proposed berms along Edmonson Avenue. The applicant has also added definition to the community center proposed on site. Grittman also mentioned that staff recommends covered parking on site and the proposed garages and underground parking result in more than adequate space for parking. Grittman addressed the slope on the backs of the two proposed buildings. Modifications have been made, but staff believes the site would benefit from added design and landscape on the slopes to blend the site in better with the proposed Small Area Plan. Architecturally, staff supports the fronts of the proposed garages, but additional architectural detail to the side and backs of the garages. Staff believes that the community building proposed on site fits the architectural request of the City. Staff does expect adjustments to the large buildings to fit the architectural design for more brick or stone on the facade of the buildings.. Eric Hagen asked for an update on the fire code concerns from last meeting. Steve Grittman said that the final agreement will not require a 360-degree road surrounding both buildings for fire access. Rather, a usable surface for a ground ladder on the back side of the buildings is required. There are other aspects of the fire prevention on site required such as the spacing of the hydrants and the suppression system inside the buildings. Eric Hagen asked about the concerns regarding the stormwater and drainage system on the proposed site. Steve Grittman responded that stormwater and drainage systems are not final, but staff and the applicant are working in that direction. Exhibit Z of the staff report includes a condition requiring as much stormwater as possible to be drained to the proposed lake site. Eric Hagen asked if the grading plan in presentation was the updated version. Steve Grittman said that was correct. Eric Hagen asked about the accessibility on the back end of both buildings and if progress was made to making it accessible. Steve Grittman said that primary pathway on site is expected to connect with the primary pathway of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan, and when it is finalized, it will be accessible. Eric Hagen asked if one of the entrances was configured due to fire access. Steve Grittman said that is an aspect of the proposed design, for service vehicles in general. It is to serve both purposes. Eric Hagen mentioned that one of the staff recommendations from the prior meeting was to open up that area to be able to view the proposed park. Steve Grittman said that this was also a request from the staff. The expectation was to have somewhat of an entry point on site to The Pointes at Cedar. This has been a talking point during discussions between the applicant and staff, but staff understands that with the design process, adjustments like this can be difficult to do. Alison Zimpfer asked if there was one parking space underground for each apartment. Steve Grittman confirmed that that was correct. Alison Zimpfer asked about the necessity of the garages on site. Zimpfer noted that the project on the north end of the Small Area Plan requested garages and were denied. Steve Grittman clarified that this proposal is slightly different than the other project because the other site did not have underground parking in the apartment buildings. An objective for multi -family buildings is to have a 1:1 underground parking ratio for each unit. The proposed garages do not change the parking set up on site, but more so gives residents an added item to rent if a garage was appealing. Alison Zimpfer noted that she could see the garages used for storage due to accessibility of the garages. Zimpfer believes they are quite a distance from the apartment buildings. Steve Grittman said that this has been a concern that has been expressed. Paul Konsor asked how one would define the architecture style to meet staff's expectations, particularly, the prairie style architecture requested for the site. Steve Grittman said that there are number of aspects that reflect prairie architecture. Some examples include horizontal themes to buildings, inclusion of brick or stone on the fagade of buildings, the goal is to reflect natural materials of the area. It is difficult to include everything that would reflect prairie architecture, especially on a four-story building. The community building and the garages do a good job of representing prairie architecture. It is encouraged that projects reflect the Small Area Plan as closely as possible. ALISON ZIMPFER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-038, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER EIGHTH ADDITION FOR MONTICELLO LAKES, A MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, BASED ON THE FINDINGS SAID RESOLUTION WITH CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN EXHIBIT Z. TERI LEHNER [.�04111510 Lille 9:1a011Ire] Lim DISCUSSION: Eric Hagen noted that at the last Planning Commission meeting, he had emphasized a number of conditions in Exhibit Z that the applicant and staff were to agree upon. He believes these conditions are moving in the right direction, and some have been completely resolved. Hagen noted he would prefer to see more brick or stone on the outside of the buildings. He believes the buildings are nice but would benefit more from added stone to help reflect the proposed "biome" of the area. Also, he indicated agreement with staff comments regarding landscaping, Hagen would like to see more prairie grass included in the site design. He wanted to make these points before discussion was closed on the item at hand. Paul Konsor agreed and noted also that the project and the buildings are designed at a high quality, but the architectural design will benefit this project more if it better reflected the prairie style architecture previously discussed. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. ALISON ZIMPFER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-039, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP, CREATING THE MONTICELLO LAKES PUD DISTRICT, AND REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO "MONTICELLO LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT", BASED ON THE FINDINGS SAID RESOLUTION WITH CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN EXHIBIT Z. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0 ALISON ZIMPFER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-040, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR MONTICELLO LAKES, A 200 UNIT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, BASED ON THE FINDINGS SAID RESOLUTION WITH CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN EXHIBIT Z. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-1, WITH PAUL KONSOR VOTING IN OPPOSITION. EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition Preliminary Plat Rezoning to PUD Monticello Lakes, Development Stage PUD 1. Revise the central entrance drive to create an expanded sense of entry and terminal view through the project. 2. Provide an updated site plan showing all amenities proposed by the development team. 3. Supplement the site plan with any proposed additional detail relating to the detached covered parking structures, including building materials, architecture, and other features that fit with the required CC -SAP theming on the site. This would include an emphasis on all four sides of these buildings, including the sides facing Edmonson Avenue. 4. Provide information on site lighting, including photometrics, wall lighting, and pole lighting details and height. Decorative lighting fixtures are encouraged to accommodate the CC -SAP theme. 5. Provide information on site signage. Decorative sign plans and materials are encouraged to accommodate the CC -SAP theme. 6. Revise the proposed grading plans to accommodate the following objectives: a. Maximize capture and pre-treatment of stormwater, directing it to other basin locations along the powerline corridor and/or the northerly abutting gateway, as directed by the City Engineering department. b. Revise the slopes on the outside exposure of the building walls to create an undulating, natural form rather than a straight-line geometric bank, and accommodate access from ground units to the exterior. 7. Compliance with fire code requirements as directed by the City. These recommendations relate to ladder access on the perimeter of the buildings, hydrant spacing and other site circulation and internal building fire code compliance requirements. 8. Revise building architecture to reflect the Chelsea Commons biome for the southern area. Incorporate prairie -style horizontal emphasis as reflected in the Community Building, including varying and interrupted roof planes, significant increase in the use of stone and/or brick above the garage -level exposures, and additional glass where practical as suggested in this report. 9. Modify the landscaping plan significantly to introduce more prairie -specific shrub and perennial species, along with oak clusters of different varieties, with particular emphasis on the outer portions of the project exposed to the common areas of the Chelsea Commons project. a. Landscaping treatments with the Gateway area beneath the powerline shall demonstrate compliance with the Chelsea Commons biome concept. b. With the modified form of the landscape, incorporate a more extensive prairie/oak planting palette throughout the project. c. Landscaping plans should be intentional and consistent with the grading plan. 10. Address all plat recommendations of the City Engineer. 11. Address park dedication recommendations of the Parks, Arts, and Recreation Commission. 12. Work with the City to ensure that connections to the adjoining Gateway and Commons area open spaces and pathways are properly placed for design, function, accessibility. and materials. Direct connections to the Commons should consider concrete pathways. 13. Compliance with the terms of the City's engineering staff letter dated October 26th, 2021. 14. Comments and recommendations of other staff and Planning Commission. B. Consideration of a request for Simple Subdivision and Lot Combination for six parcels located in the R-2 (Single and Two -Family Residence) District. Applicant: Michaelis, Jeff and Joan Steve Grittman provided an overview of the application and staff report to the Planning Commission and the public. Grittman said that each proposed parcel would meet the requirements of the zoning area, the only exception is the driveway arrangement that serves the two homes on the west parcels. One of the conditions staff has required is for the applicant to verify this use under an agreement rather than the verbal agreement used in previous years. This would be to clarify that this is a public right-of-way with a private improvement, so the applicant is responsible for maintaining that driveway. Staff recommends approval of the subdivision and combination. Grittma noted that there was discussion regarding the combination of lots to better square off the parcels, however the applicant has explained that the parcel combining with the north home has been its backyard. Based on the historical use of the parcels, staff finds this to be an acceptable layout. Paul Konsor asked if all the parcels are owned by the applicant. Grittman confirmed. Eric Hagen asked if there was a natural boundary that connects the backyard parcel with the north side home where it cannot join other parcels. Steve Grittman said that it was understood that the parcel has been used as a back yard for that home. Paul Konsor asked if there was a fence to the south separating parcel A and Parcel C on the proposed site plan. Grittman confirmed. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-045, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE SUBDIVISION AND COMBINATION, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION, AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED IN EXHIBIT Z. Alison Zimpfer asked if the applicant does not adjust the lot lines to square off the properties, would that have be called out in the motion. Grittman said it is written in Exhibit Z specifically to make it an option for the applicant to do so, it is not required. ALISON ZIMPFER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4- 0. EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval for Simple Subdivision and Lot Combination 1. If feasible, PID 155015038082, shown as parcel 4 in the staff report illustration, may be added to proposed Parcel C, rather than Parcel A as shown in the applicant's survey of 9-30-21. This condition is optional for the applicant. 2. Staff and applicant verify easement descriptions, and that no existing easements interfere with the final subdivided lots, or that an appropriate vacation hearing is held to address existing easement locations. 3. The applicant enters into a use and maintenance license agreement for the use of the Hennepin Street right of way as private shared driveway between Parcels B and C. 4. The applicant's surveyor prepares the legal descriptions for the required Wright County Certificates of Subdivision and Combination. 5. In the event that the County Surveyor rejects the proposed legal descriptions, the applicant re -apply for Preliminary and Final Plat for the subdivision. 6. Recommendations of the City Engineer. 7. Recommendations of other staff and Planning Commission. 4. Consideration of the Community Development Director's Report 5. Added Items None 6. Adjournment TERI LEHNER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:35 P.M. Recorder: Hayden Stensgard Approved: Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Planning Commission Agenda - 12/07/2021 2A. Public Hearing - Consideration of an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for a Retail Building Expansion in the Central Community District (CCD) Applicant: JR & R II LLC (Runnings Supply, Inc.) Prepared by: Northwest Associated Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Consultants (NAC) Commission action): 12/07/2021 12/13/21 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Chief Building and Zoning Official, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Project Engineer, Fire Marshal ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision: Consideration of a request for an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development to allow a retail building expansion in the CCD, Central Community District. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2021-046, recommending approval of the amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for a retail building addition in the CCD, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z, based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC 2021-046, recommending approval of the amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for a retail building addition in the CCD, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. 2021-046. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Descriptions: Lot 2, Block 1, Kirkman Addition and Outlot C, Kirkman Addition PID's: 155068001020 & 155068000030 Address: 300 West 7t" Street Planning Case Number: 2021-046 Request(s): Planned Unit Development Amendment to allow an addition to a retail building in a CCD, Central Community District. Deadline for Decision: January 7, 2022 (60-day deadline) March 8, 2022 (120-day deadline) 1 Planning Commission Agenda - 12/07/2021 Land Use Designation Zoning Designation Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use Regional Commercial CCD, Central Community, General CCD Sub -District The purpose of the CCD, Central Community District, is to provide for a wide variety of land uses, transportation options, and public activities in the downtown Monticello area, and particularly to implement the goals, objectives, and specific directives of the Comprehensive Plan, and in particular, the 2017 Downtown Monticello "Small Area Plan" Comprehensive Plan Amendment and its design and performance standards. The Zoning Map detail below illustrates the location of the two parcels of land which comprises the Runnings retail store site. -■ Freestanding Sign Overlay District Retail store which offers home and farm supplies as well as recreational equipment; outdoor sales and display. 2 Planning Commission Agenda - 12/07/2021 Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial and Multi -Family Residential East: Grocery Store (Cub Foods) South: Interstate 94 West: Vacant Commercial Project Description: Runnings Supply, Inc. is proposing to construct a 13,962 square foot building addition on the west side of their existing 90,133 square foot retail store. Including the proposed building expansion, the building would measure 104,095 square feet in size. The building expansion is proposed in an area of the site presently devoted to outside storage. As a result, the size of the outdoor storage area is proposed to be reduced from 17,850 square feet to 14,850 square feet. Additionally, the proposed building expansion would result in the loss of 18 off-street parking spaces. ANALYSIS Planned Unit Development Amendment. In this case, the purpose of the PUD amendment is to accommodate a proposed expansion to the of the Runnings retail building located at 300 West 71" Street. The Planned Unit Development originated under a conditional use permit with the original site development including cross parking and access. Site Access and Circulation. No changes to site access have been proposed. The expanded retail building would continue to be accessed from the north via two entrances along 7t" Street West. As a result of the proposed building expansion, a relatively minor change in site circulation is proposed. To accommodate semi -truck maneuvers around the proposed building addition, it will be necessary to remove 18 parking spaces located in the northwest corner of the site. The Fire Department staff have noted that changes will be required to demonstrate that the City's fire apparatus can follow the same path for firefighting access to the rear (southwest) corner of the site. As a part of this change, the access road will need to be expanded from the illustrated 20 feet to a minimum of 24 feet in width, and an additional hydrant on the north side of the building will be necessary. These and other related changes are a requirement of the City's fire code and operations. While the site plan notes that 18 stalls are to be removed, Staff recommends that the site plan be modified to illustrate the intended design of the parking area with the removal of the 18 Planning Commission Agenda - 12/07/2021 referenced stalls. As now shown, the dead-end aisle design is not revised, and creates an issue for parking access to the westerly rank of parking stalls. Off -Street Parking. As indicated, the applicant is proposing to remove 18 existing off-street parking stalls. In consideration of the proposed building expansion, it is important to determine whether an adequate amount of parking will remain on the site. A total of 354 off-street parking spaces presently exist on the site. With the elimination of 18 stalls, a total of 336 spaces will remain. According to the Zoning Ordinance, retail uses within CCD zoning districts must provide at least one off-street space per 350 square feet of floor space. In this regard, the proposed 104,095 square foot building must provide a minimum of 298 spaces. Thus, an adequate off-street parking supply will still exist following removal of the 18 spaces. Also, to be recognized is that the Runnings store is party to a cross access and parking agreement with the adjacent Cub Foods grocery store (in the event overflow parking becomes necessary). Outdoor Sales & Display/Fencing. The applicant has indicated that the existing outdoor sales and display area on the site is to be slightly reconfigured and reduced in size from 17,850 square feet (70' x 225') to 14,850 square feet (45' x 330'). The Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum of 5% of the gross principle use floor area in outdoor sales and display as an accessory use. Additional area may be accommodated by CUP. Therefore, the continued sales and display area would be a considered a component of the amendment consideration. The applicant has further indicated that the outdoor sales and display area will be secured via 100 percent opaque PVC fencing on the north, south and west sides, and a vinyl -coated chain - link fence on the east side. In consideration of the configuration change, some concerns exist related to the visibility and appearance of the outdoor sales area. Whereas the existing outdoor sales area is located south of (or behind) the front building line of the store, the reconfigured sales and display area will extend 90 feet north of the front building line and be visible to store customers. To minimize the visual impacts of the outdoor sales area, the following are recommended as conditions of PUD amendment approval: 1. For the portion of the outdoor sales area which extends north of the front building line of the store, decorative fencing, the type of which is found to be acceptable to the City, be provided. In this regard, a wrought iron -like fence, similar to that erected by Walmart for their storage area adjacent to School Boulevard, would be considered appropriate. 4 Planning Commission Agenda - 12/07/2021 Runnings has also previously had a rotating outdoor display area located within the parking stalls fronting 7t" Street. The current site plan does not detail that area. If the applicant intends to continue use of that area, the applicant is required to define that sales and display area, limiting the display area consistent with code allowances. The sales and display area may not reduce the required amount of parking (298 spaces). Landscaping. No changes to site landscaping have been proposed as part of the PUD amendment application. With the building addition, the applicant will be required to provide additional landscaping for the additional building perimeter, per code requirements. Maximum Height. Within CCD zoning Districts, a minimum principal building height of 18 feet and maximum principal building height of 50 feet is required. Greater structure heights are however, allowed by conditional use permit or as part of PUD amendment processing. The submitted building elevations illustrate a proposed building addition height of 15' - 8 which is well -within the maximum height requirement of the Ordinance, but less than the minimum 18-foot height requirement. While the proposed building addition height is less than the minimum requirement imposed in the CCD District, Staff feels such addition is compatible with the existing structure (which measures approximately 23 feet in height). Therefore, as a condition of PUD amendment approval, it is recommended that the height of the building addition be acknowledged is being acceptable (via the flexibility granted via PUD processing). Finish Materials. According to the Ordinance, buildings in CCD Districts must adhere to the following material requirements, per Section 3.5(G).2: Building materials for all uses shall be predominantly glass, brick, natural or cultured stone, or equivalent masonry material. Materials for lapped siding, board -and -batten, or shake exteriors shall be composite, maintenance free materials, and shall be limited in overall exterior use to: • Residential structures, no more than 30 percent of building exterior. • Commercial and other structures, no more than 15 percent of building exterior may be comprised of architectural metal, which shall be integrated into the building design. • Mixed use buildings shall comply with the commercial building requirements. According to the submitted building elevations, the proposed building addition is to be finished in concrete masonry units (CMU's) and will be painted to match the existing structure. In this regard, the building addition satisfies the building material requirements of the Ordinance. Lighting. The applicant has indicated that no changes to existing site lighting is planned. 5 Planning Commission Agenda - 12/07/2021 Trash/Recycling. Neither the submitted site survey or site plan depict a trash handling/recycling location. In this regard, no changes to existing trash/recycling handling activities are anticipated. This should, however, be confirmed by the applicant. Signage. The applicant has suggested that no new signage will accompany the proposed building addition. Grading, Drainage and Utilities. The applicant has indicated the no changes to the existing amount of impervious service area is proposed. If any drainage issues/concerns presently exist on the site, the planned unit development amendment process does provide the City with an opportunity to address such issues. Issues related to site grading, drainage and utilities should be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City Staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development Amendment, as proposed by the applicant at 300 West 71h Street, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2021-046, Planned Unit Development Amendment B. Aerial Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Site Survey —Existing Conditions E. Site Survey —Proposed Expansion F. Building Elevations G. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts Z. Conditions of Approval 0 Planning Commission Agenda - 12/07/2021 EXHIBIT Z Planned Unit Development Amendment Runnings Supply, Inc. Lot 2, Block 1, Kirkman Addition and Outlot C, Kirkman Addition 300 West 7t" Street 1. The site plan shall be modified to illustrate the intended design of the parking area with the removal of the 18 referenced stalls and the possible addition of a row -end parking island. 2. The applicant shall confirm on their site plan all locations of intended outdoor display and sales area, which shall not exceed code allowances of 30% of the floor area and shall not reduce the minimum amount of required parking on the site. 3. The proposed fire lane shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire Marshal. At minimum, widening of the lane is required to 24 feet, and turning movement/access for City fire apparatus is demonstrated. An additional hydrant will be required along the north side of the building, and other requirements of the City's fire officials are addressed. 4. Fencing around the west perimeter of the outdoor storage area shall match the existing opaque materials. 5. For the portion of the outdoor storage area which extends north of the front building line of the store, decorative fencing as noted in this report (similar to that utilized by Walmart as example) shall be provided. 6. The height of the building addition (15' - 8") is acknowledged as being acceptable (via the flexibility granted via PUD processing). 7. The applicant will be required to provide additional landscaping for the additional building perimeter, per code requirements. 8. The applicant shall confirm that no changes to existing trash/recycling handling activities are anticipated. 9. No new site signage is included with this project. 10. Issues related to site grading, drainage and utilities shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-046 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR AN EXPANSION TO THE RUNNINGS RETAIL FACILITY REVISING THE SITE AND BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL IN THE CCD ZONING DISTRICT PID: 155-068-001020 & 155-068-000030 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct an expansion of the current commercial building for the applicant's retail business; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned CCD, Central Community District, and is subject to a previously approved Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of Regional Commercial for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking the amendment to accommodate a revised building and site layout; and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided materials otherwise documenting compliance with the terms of the applicable zoning regulations and consistent with existing improvements; and WHEREAS, the uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the CCD zoning district; and WHEREAS, the uses will not create any unanticipated changes to the demand for public services on or around the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 71", 2021 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-046 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the CCD, Central Community Zoning District. 2. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed expansion of the building and change to storage area meets the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, subject to the flexibility granted under the PUD and the conditions attached to this PUD Amendment resolution. 5. Impacts on public utilities or other services, primarily firefighting access, are addressed as a result of the proposed amendment and the conditions cited herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment for an expansion to the existing building and related necessary site improvements, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. The site plan shall be modified to illustrate the intended design of the parking area with the removal of the 18 referenced stalls and the possible addition of a row -end parking island. 2. The applicant shall confirm on their site plan all locations of intended outdoor display and sales area, which shall not exceed code allowances of 30% of the floor area and shall not reduce the minimum amount of required parking on the site. 3. The proposed fire lane shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire Marshal. At minimum, widening of the lane is required to 24 feet, and turning movement/access for City fire apparatus is demonstrated. An additional hydrant will be required along the north side of the building, and other requirements of the City's fire officials are addressed. 4. Fencing around the west perimeter of the outdoor storage area shall match the existing opaque materials. 5. For the portion of the outdoor storage area which extends north of the front building line of the store, decorative fencing as noted in this report (similar to that utilized by Walmart as example) shall be provided. 6. The height of the building addition (15' - 8") is acknowledged as being acceptable (via the flexibility granted via PUD processing). 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-046 7. The applicant will be required to provide additional landscaping for the additional building perimeter, per code requirements. 8. The applicant shall confirm that no changes to existing trash/recycling handling activities are anticipated. 9. No new site signage is included with this project. 10. Issues related to site grading, drainage and utilities shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. ADOPTED this 71h day of December, 2021 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION : Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 Request for Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development LOT 2, BLOCK 1 AND OUTLOT C, KI RKMAN ADDITION 1 155068001020, 155068000030 1 300 7th St W Created by: City of Monticello Your Home, Farm & Outdoor Store Project Summary - PUD Amendment Running Supply, Inc.(JR&R II, LLC) is proposing to construct a 13,962 square foot building Addition on the west side of their existing retail store. This addition will cause for the reconfigure of the existing 17,850 sq ft (70'x225') Secured Outdoor Storage Area. The proposed storage area would be narrowed from 70' to 45' wide and lengthened from 225' to 330' reducing the outside secured storage to 14,850 Sq ft. Fencing will match the existing Vinyl Coated Chainlink on the East side of the storage area and 100% Opaque PVC Fence on the South, North and West Sides. The reconfiguration of the storage area will cause for the loss of 18 parking spaces. Currently on the subject property there are 354 parking spaces and this proposal would reduce the number to 336. Off-street parking required for the gross floor area of the existing building and the addition is 297 parking spaces. Runnings has in the past and wishes to continue to apply for an annual permit for an outdoor greenhouse and retails sales during the summer months. According to store sales, the busiest store hours are on Fridays between 2:00 pm and 7:00 pm. A vehicle count using the outside cameras yielded 48 parking spaces used. Saturdays at noon in the other busiest time which shows 60 parking spaces used. Store employees on any given day are between 20 to 25. The building addition is expected to increase shoppers by 10% to 15%. Using this information, the store would require a minimum of 97 parking spaces. Based on the remaining number of spaces (354) and the fact that there is a cross access and parking agreement with the Cub Foods property, Runnings feels that there are more than enough spaces to accommodate traffic for the retail store. The project will also delineate a Fire Lane on the West Side of the Addition with the parking lot and exterior lighting to the north of the existing retail store to remain as -is, with plans to potentially resurface the lot with this project. There will be no new impervious surface created. The location of the proposed addition is currently surface with concrete and a smaller building addition that will be demolished. There will be no changes to the landscaping plan. There will be no changes to the site utility plan. Thank you for your consideration Respectfully, Chad Weyh, Construction/Maintenance Manager 901 N. Highway 59 • Marshall, MN 56258.507-532-9566 • www.runnings com <<- • N73 � 35 CN LE „ R, 3° °° D—$•3 '21 LZ 6 /iL n n DRAINAGE AND — — UTILITY EASEMENT I I � 0 D OR EL C F, �=195.19 DRAINAGE AND — — UTILITY EASEMENT SITE SURVEY EXISTING CONDITIONS S 89.56'55"W 296.67 EX ST NIS BU U NIS (REFERRED TO AS K—MART BUILDING" IN DECLARATION OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS, DOC. NO. 470483) n N I b DRAINAGE AND — I O UTILITY EASEMENT I Z 6 �� � 8 S 89.37' 19" E 18.00 FI nT / L_ I Sao N PLAN 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN FEET w what's 13MO 11. Call b*ftyou III g PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 1 AND OUTLOT C, KIRKMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD AND ON FILE IN THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS OFFICE IN AND FOR WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. BENCHMARK ELEVATION = 936.80 TOP NUT HYDRANT AT NE QUADRANT OF 7TH ST AND LOCUST 6 Bearings are Referenced to "Grid North" of the NAD83 /,'' N 64.05'07" W Wright County Coordinate System (1996 Adj.) 2.14 O LEGEND CIO o �\ O Denotes a placed 1/2 Inch x 15 Inch Rebar Ln with a Plastic Cap Stamped 42302 • Denotes Found Iron Monument Jn T Unless Otherwise Noted Li L _ U (AZ 89°05 29" 890.95) Denotes Record Distance and/or Direction o' 00 L,L__��r Lq N 89.37' 19" W LO 40.00 — I I w LLd I L O O low I u7 v v v << < �> W 3 (1 v I f A v DRAINAGE AND — — 6 O UTILITY EASEMENT / i \ DRAINAGE AND — Z EASEMENT FOR STORM WATER PONDING _ _ — — — UTILITY EASEMENT 6 — i AND STORM DRAIN PER DOC. NO. 528880 — S 79.48,38» E 17902 N IT 7 DRAINAGE AND — — UTILITY EASEMENT A=22.23'46" R=854.93 L=334.18 lI v I �_I I �—� i C— FI F� v v /—� i vUo S'`t g�pce 194� o tv 1t� I C E * CO 4v M E D I N architects ,, inc rRIDGELINE G R O U P ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 30692 HIGHWAY 58 BLVD RED WING, MN 55066 (651) 764-9521 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MARK A SCHOENFELDER DATE November 15, 2021 Up. NO. 42302 ENIIIIIIIIIIIII u O rT1 V 1 l O M PROJECT #: 621040 DRAWN BY: MAS CHECKED BY: MAS PRELIM DATE: BID SET DATE: PERMIT SET DATE: REVISION: PRINTED: SITE SURVEY C2,00 « =a• 35 �L LL L 6 L 18 r 17 �I 3 I �I I � n I— DRAINAGE AND — — REM VE UTILITY EASEMENT © I I 18 PAF KING 1 I SPA ES 1 I 4 0 2 1 4 I I I � I I I I I i 1 S I { 00 0 3 8 00 If'i �rJ� u76.2'— LLIJJ ` I Q o� � I I II • n•Qt�tll co • • '����/ • 1 0 /� I I� 0 • A � PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMMENDMENT RUNNINGS PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION �=195.19 R=550.00 — b « � DRAINAGE AND — — UTILITY EASEMENT AR A OF ANC ERMIT FC SU MER RE SALES/GAR[ CENTER 1 SPACE 7TH STREET S 89°56'55"W 296.67 LOT AIN i O 00 777777777777 0 Ln 00 w J W O O W� P/J r 0 o a T EX ST NG BU U NG (REFERRED TO AS X—MART BUILDING" IN DECLARATION (D / OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS, DOC. NO. 470483) OR EL I \ LL ti o m ®® 2 _ _ L 0 LO I I W J W O O J L� VV V ITING vG V < 1 — <-4 N w -- o(o DRAINAGE AND — I O UTILITY EASEMENT I Z 20 20 - S 89*37' 19" E $ 18.00 n1 �T / � N �0 — N 64'05'07" W 2.14 I I I /1 T -I <' L,L_��r \ LO KEY NOTES: O THICKENED EDGE CONCRETE O2 BOLLARD O REMOVE EXISTING FENCE ® FENCE (TO MATCH EXISTING) O RELOCATE SALT SHED © RELOCATED SALT SHED O REMOVALS IN BUILDING ADDITION AREA ® REMOVE BOLLARD PLAN 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN FEET ti w what's 11MO 11. Call b*ft you dig PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 1 AND OUTLOT C, KIRKMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD AND ON FILE IN THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS OFFICE IN AND FOR WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. N PROJECT SITE SUMMARY N O O Zoning: CCD Central Community District Z Sub -District Pine Street \ Freeway Overlay District Gross Lot Area: 357,544 Sq. Ft. (8.21 Acres) Parking: N 89*37' 19" W 40'00 _ Existing Floor Area 90,133 Sq. Ft. Building Addition Floor Area 13,962 Sq. Ft. Total Floor Area 104,095 Sq. Ft. I , L Required Parking 1 Space Per 350 Sq. Ft. of Floor Space 104,095/350 = 297 Parking Spaces Existing Parking on Property 354 Spaces (D)TRUCK D C `4- O L Proposed Parking 336 Spaces I LO v w 3 (1 vV A 04 DRAINAGE AND — — 6 UTILITY EASEMENT � \ \ � \ � i � / �— � Z EASEMENT FOR STORM WATER PONDING _ _ z i — _ _ — \ DRA ITY EASEMENT , 6 — i — AND STORM DRAIN PER DOC. NO. 528880 — 1 79.02 � — — — — � 48 •� 3 �,E N 7 4�'3 %` DRAINAGE AND --� UTILITY EASEMENT A=22°23'46" R=854.93 L=334.18 \ I -T- F-� A _TT- I II 11 A / A N I/1 AI v I L_i I /—\ i L_ FI ��F� v v /—\ i vUo S'`t BENCHMARK ELEVATION = 936.80 TOP NUT HYDRANT AT NE QUADRANT OF 7TH ST AND LOCUST L Bearings are Referenced to "Grid North" of the NAD83 Wright County Coordinate System (1996 Adj.) LEGEND O Denotes a placed 1/2 Inch x 15 Inch Rebar with a Plastic Cap Stamped 42302 • Denotes Found Iron Monument Unless Otherwise Noted (AZ 89.0529" 890.95) Denotes Record Distance and/or Direction PROPERTY INFORMATION 300 7TH STREET MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PID(s) 155068001020 155068000030 OWNER INFORMATION JR&R II LLC 901 HIGHWAY 59 MARSHALL, MN 56258-2744 gipce 1949 0 tv CE M E D I N architects ,1 inc rRIDGELINE G R O U P ENGINEERS (t PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 30692 HIGHWAY 58 BLVD RED WING, MN 55066 (651) 764-9521 Ml- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MARK A SCHOENFELDER DATE November 4. 2021 LIC• NO. 42302 O I� I� 0 I~� w 1� V1 w 0 � w � 0 M PROJECT #: 621040 DRAWN BY: MAS CHECKED BY: MAS PRELIM DATE: BID SET DATE: PERMIT SET DATE: REVISION: 11-30-21 PRINTED: SITE SURVEY C I'a 0 PREFINISHED 1"ITL. FLASHING T.O. CMU EL. 115 -8 CMU (PAINT MATCH EXIST.) DOWNSPOUT 6" BOLLARD T.O. SLAB EL. 100 -0 ob---------------- i, STOREFRONT rL---------------------------------------------------------------------- J-1 T.O. FOOTING --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------j EL. q6 -8 L_ .� NORTH ELEVATION SCALE.- iro• . r-m• rL----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------rL---------------- EL. q6 -8 L--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------L---- - - - - - - - - - - - - .� SOUTH ELEVATION -: xaF� iro• . r-m• =\/I! T rL-----------------------------------------T L---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------J T-----------------------------------Ll L-----------------------------------------1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ EXISTING 17q'-O" PROPOSED ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING WEST ELEVATION xaF, ve• . r_m• DESIGNED DJM DRAWN NES CHECKED DJM PROJECT 21-054 REVISIONS I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. (architectural only) DAVID J. MEDIN License No. gag5 Date Nov OB/ 2021 Z Z LU z O LU IF O architects,, inc. 203 n.w First Ave. Favilault 1v1NS5o21 507/334-2252 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 19009 ©All drowings and content copyright DJ r ledin Architects, Inc. CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses 9 , . ' - -. Indoor Storage P P P P p P 5.3 D 20 Incidental Light p p p p P 5.3(D)(21) Manufacturing Machinery/Trucking :�iEc 5.3(D)(22) Repair & Sales Office P P P P P P none Off-street Loading p p C P P P P P P P 4.9 Space Off-street Parking P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.8 Open Sales P h C C C 5.3(D(23) Operation and storage of agricultural P 5.3(D)(24) vehicles, equipment, and machinery Outdoor Seating — Accessory to restaurant, bar, production brewery with P\C P\C P\C P\C 5.3(D)(25) taproom, microdistillery with cocktail room, and/or brewpubs Outdoor Sidewalk Sales & Display P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(26) (businesses) Residential 5.3(D)(27)(a) Outdoor Storage P P P P P P P P P P Industrial 5.3 D 27 b Park Facility Buildings & P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(28) Structures (public) Private Amateur 4.13(B Radio P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Private Receiving Antennae and P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p 4.13(C) Antenna Support Structures City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 415 CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (26) Outdoor Sidewalk Sales and Display Outdoor sidewalk sales and display areas associated with legally permitted retail uses shall: (a) Not encroach into areas necessary for the safe ingress and egress into the retail structure; (b) Maintain a minimum pedestrian walkway of at least five feet in width along the front of the display; (c) Take place only on an improved dustless surface; (d) May not take up required parking; (e) The area of the site devoted to sidewalk sales and display under this section shall not exceed five (5) percent of the gross floor area of the principal use. Sidewalk sales and display which exceed five (5) percent of the gross floor area of the principal use may be allowed by conditional use permit. (27) Outdoor Storage (a) In all zoning districts, all materials and equipment, except as specifically denoted in this ordinance, shall be stored within a building or fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties except for the following: (i) Clothes line pole and wire. Section 4.8: Off- (ii) Recreational equipment and vehicles, subject to off-street parking Street Parking regulations in Section 4.8 of this ordinance. (iii) Construction and landscaping material currently being used on the premises. (iv) Off-street parking of passenger vehicles, emergency vehicles and -small commercial vehicles in residential areas, unless otherwise required to be screened according to Section 4.8 of this ordinance. (v) Propane tanks, fuel oil tanks, and other similar residential heating fuel storage tanks which do not exceed 1,000 gallons in capacity and shall not be located within five (5) feet of any property line. (vi) Wood piles in which wood is stored for fuel provided that not more than 10 cords shall be stored on any property. A cord shall be 4'x4'x8'. (vii) All wood piles shall be five (5) feet or more from the rear and side yard property lines and shall be stored behind the appropriate setback line in front yards. (viii) Solar energy systems. (ix) Wind energy conversion systems. (b) In the I-1 and I-2 districts, the following shall apply: City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 431 Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 2B. Public Hearing — Consideration of Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat of Twin Pines Apartments, a 93-unit multi -family residential project in a B-4 (Regional Business) District. Applicant: Kjellberg, Kent Prepared by: Northwest Associated Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Consultants (NAC) Commission action): 12/07/2021 12/13/2021 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Chief Building and Zoning Official, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Project Engineer, Fire Marshal ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of a recommendation for a rezoning of the subject property from B-4, Regional Commercial to PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2021-047 recommending approval of rezoning of the subject property from B-4 to Twin Pines Planned Unit Development District, based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC 2021-047 recommending approval of rezoning of the subject property from B-4 to Twin Pines Planned Unit Development District, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. 2021-047 Decision 2: Consideration of a recommendation for a Development Stage Planned Unit Development to accommodate a 93-unit multiple family residential project on the subject property as an amendment to the existing PUD. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2021-048 recommending approval of a Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Twin Pines, a 93-unit multi -family residential project, subject to the Conditions in Exhibit Z, and based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC 2021-048 approval of a Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Twin Pines, a 93-unit multi -family residential project, subject to the Conditions in Exhibit Z, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. 2021-048 Decision 3: Consideration of a recommendation for a Preliminary Plat modifying the current Outlot into a buildable parcel as a part of the Planned Unit Development District. Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2021-049 recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat of the Twin Pines Addition, subject to the Conditions in Exhibit Z, and based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC 2021-049 recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat of the Twin Pines Addition, subject to the Conditions in Exhibit Z, and based on findings in said resolution. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. 2021-049 REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: PID: 155-221-000010 Legal: Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 6t" Addn. Planning Case Number: 2021-047 Deadline for Decision: January 7, 2021(60-day deadline) March 8, 2021 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: Commercial -Residential Flex Zoning Designation: B-4, Regional Business, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Vacant Outlot as future phase of Commercial PUD Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial East: Medium Density Residential South: Powerline Easement/Manufactured Home Park West: Commercial Project Description: The project consists of site and building improvements resulting in a 93-unit multi -family residential development, four stories of units over an underground parking garage, surface parking, and private open space. 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Plan /Land Use: The site was initially anticipated to develop as a series of commercial buildings which would share parking and a single access point to School Boulevard. The initial concept was approved under a Conditional use Permit for Planned Unit Development and the plan for the PUD envisioned as many as three additional commercial buildings around the perimeter of the site and a central parking area. The applicants now seek to utilize the south portion of the site for multi -family residential of 93 total units on 4 floors of residential use, with both an underground parking garage and a surface parking lot. Access would continue to be provided to the site through an existing parking lot (primarily anticipated to be the easterly of the two access aisles). The proposed use previously included an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan reguiding this portion of the development for residential uses. Since that time, the City has adopted a new Land Use Plan designating the site as Commercial -Residential Flex, which accommodates the proposed mix of land uses. The City previously approved the development stage PUD, plat, and land use requirements in January of 2020. Due to concerns related to impacts from the Covid-19 issue which arose soon thereafter, further plan approvals were withheld by the applicants. The applicants now seek to renew those approvals and proceed with the project. As a PUD, the expectation is that the overall development design would show a superior alternative to a "standard" R-4, Multi -Family Residential design. The R-4 District, which would be the base district underlying the PUD zoning, incorporates a heavy emphasis on architecture, site planning, and green space as a baseline requirement for considering the conversion of land from commercial to residential. The applicants have worked through a series of alternative solutions to these issues. The current version makes only small changes to the primary access location along School Boulevard. This was recommended during the Concept review, as opposed to a realigned entrance. Residential traffic entering the site will travel through the existing commercial parking lots (it is expected that the primary access route would be through the office lot to the east, rather than the veterinary clinic lot to the west). Traffic would then enter the surface parking lot provided for the residential building, or choose to utilize the down -ramp aisle leading to the underground parking on the east side of the building. As a part of those prior approvals, the applicants would sign the traffic routing to encourage tenants of the multi -family facility to avoid use of the veterinary clinic parking area to the west. This design, together with the signage improvements, will work to address that property owner's concerns. It is noted that the original PUD continues to control, with joint access through the entire site, and no changes in those rights are made as a result of this approval. Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 Staff's original concerns with the parking and access related to the sense of residential entry. Those concerns were addressed with changes to the pavement surfaces, monumentation, and landscaping at the entrance to the project area, south of the commercial parking lots. The applicants will be required to submit additional signage detail reinforcing both the traffic patterns and the entrance monumentation as a part of the condition of approval and final stage review. Ordinance Requirements & PUD Flexibility: Parking, Access and Circulation. Parking is an area of flexibility being sought by the use of PUD on this project. The ordinance would expect a standard minimum supply of 2.25 parking spaces per residential unit, with no more than 1.1 spaces per unit uncovered (the remaining required to be covered/underground). The proposed parking for the 93 unit building is 76 spaces underground, and 80 spaces attributable to the residential building as surface parking, a total of 156 spaces or 1.7 spaces per unit. In reviewing parking supply for multi -family buildings of this type, staff has researched expected parking demand, and has found that spaces -per -bedroom to be a more reliable predictor of overall parking usage. Approximately .9 to 1.0 spaces per bedroom has been shown to provide reasonable parking supply for multi -family buildings of this type. The proposed building contains 47 one -bedroom or studio units, 42 two -bedroom units, and 12 3-bedroom units, a total of 143 bedrooms. Applying these parking numbers to the proposed building, the applicants propose 1.09 parking spaces per bedroom. While this does not meet the general code requirement, it would be expected to adequately serve the project. One issue of note would be that there are fewer underground spaces than units, so some residents will not have access to underground parking. The applicant has indicated a willingness to provide a cross -easement for parking with adjacent commercial office building parking lot. For overnight parking, this should provide an effective measure if the need becomes evident. Staff would therefore recommend a requirement for the cross -parking agreement proposed between this project and Outlot A, which surrounds the commercial office building. One final aspect of this parking count: it is common that apartment managers will make underground parking available as an option to tenants that choose to pay an additional fee. This arrangement would not be workable on this site if the underground garage fails to fill up — too many residents would be seeking surface parking, which would have very little, if any, available overflow. As such, an operational requirement, to be included in the development agreement, would be that each of the underground spaces are included in the rent set for specific units so the parking generated by the project does not attempt to occupy the commercial parking lots. Finally, it is noted that pedestrian connections to this site will be of paramount importance, given that the relatively dense site will rely on adjacent trail amenities to support access to adjacent public park facilities. Access to parkland to the east and south (including Pioneer Park 4 Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 and Featherstone Park, as well as the future park/water feature The Pointes at Cedar area being contemplated to the north) will be important considerations for a successful residential environment. Landscaping. As noted above, landscaping and green space are a potential issue on this site, given the limited land area (especially in the north entry area of the project). The applicants have provided an extensive landscaping plan for the site, exceeding the minimum requirements of the code. The landscape plan indicates that all but one of the trees in the existing boundary plantings along the east border abutting the Autumn Ridge Townhomes will be removed, due primarily to required grading in that area. However, the planting plan shows an increase in overall replaced trees in that area, with 22 trees being removed, but as many as 40 new trees in that area. In the event that there are significant changes to the site plan due to other review notes, the landscaping plan would need to be revised to demonstrate compliance with these notes. Lighting. The applicant's submission does not include a lighting plan. This plan should be submitted for review as a part of any Final PUD package. Staff would note that care should be taken to minimize parking lot lighting on the residential building, and this may include consideration of existing parking lot lighting in the commercial areas of the site. A photometric plan should take this into consideration. Signage. No signage plan has been submitted at this point. Staff notes that each of the two existing buildings has a freestanding monument -style sign in the front yard along School Boulevard. Staff would require a coordinated sign plan to avoid additional free-standing signs in this space. Building Design. The plans show a four-story building from grade at the front (north) elevation. The same elevation from grade is maintained around the building, with the exception of the lower -level access to the garage parking area on the east. If there is to be exposed areas of the lower garage level, staff would recommend that the approved exterior finish materials be extended to the finished grade, rather than exposed concrete block or other exposure. The proposed materials consist of a combination of brick along the first floor exposure, and extending up the stairwell columns, with a variety of cement -board panels on the remainder of the building. A contrasting ribbed cement board panel extends around most of the upper parapet of the building. The R-4 District requires at least 20% of the front exposure to consist of "enhanced materials" (such as brick), with cement board as a qualifying alternative material on the remainder of the building. The proposed building exceeds these minimum standards. In addition, the R-4 District requires a minimum "articulation" of at least 3 feet across the span of the primary roof line. The applicants have met this standard by including a series of vertical 5 Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 columns that extend above the main roof parapet, and a corner architectural feature at the northwest corner that extends to this additional elevation. The building height overall is not shown on the plans, but appears to be approximately 40 feet to the main parapet. This should be confirmed with the applicants. The exterior finish includes suspended balconies for each unit. The materials are not specified, but are presumed to be a finished metal. This should be verified as well. The applicant will also need to supply final square footage calculations for each of the proposed 93 units. The current R-4 standards require a minimum of 900 square feet total. The applicants will need to verify whether the units will meet the standard, or the level of flexibility under PUD that is requested. Utilities, Grading and Drainage. The City Engineer has provided comment on the grading, drainage, and utilities for the project in the Engineer's Letter dated December 2nd, 2021. Fire Code. At the time of this report, the Fire Department's comments were not available. The applications are therefore subject to the comments of the City's Fire Marshal. Accessory Use Requirements Trash Handling. The applicants have shown an exterior trash enclosure near the south end of the easterly office building. This enclosure is intended to handle trash for the commercial use. The applicants indicate that the trash handling for the proposed residential project will be indoors, consistent with other residential projects in the City. Plat Standards Preliminary/Final Plat. The project requires a plat to convert the current Outlot into a numbered lot and block for the development parcel, with an outlot remaining to serve the existing commercial office building. The applicant has provided a preliminary plat drawing which illustrates the replatting of Outlot A into a lot and block of approximately 2.5 acres and an outlot surrounding Lot 1, Block 1 of Twin Pines First Addition. The plat is subject to the City Engineer's review comments. The Plat does not appear to alter the boundaries of the existing lots. However, as a part of the plat review, it will be important to reconfirm the required cross -easements for access and other services throughout the site. Required plat perimeter easements are not shown. The preliminary plat is required to be revised to illustrate the required easements per the City Engineer. A vacation of the drainage and utility easement over the current outlot will also be required. The applicant shall petition for this vacation as part of the platting process, with new easements as required by the Subdivision Ordinance to be platted. As noted previously, the project anticipated joint access, parking, and utility services for commercial uses. The introduction of a residential use into the commercial PUD and/or its 0 Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 management association will require review to ensure that the site continues to be properly managed over the longterm. Therefore, a condition requiring the submittal of association and/or common area easement documents is required. The documents shall be subject to the review and comment of the City Attorney. Park Dedication As a residential subdivision, the development is subject to park dedication requirements. As of the time of this report, the PARC Commission had not yet met to provide a recommendation on dedication requirements for the new application. The PARC Commission had recommended a cash -in -lieu dedication with the 2019 approvals. Given the site layout and constraints, a cash dedication is likely to be recommended by staff to the Commission, in addition to the pedestrian connections noted earlier in this report. This will be verified prior to the final plat and PUD approvals. Under State Statute 462.358, with platting or replatting, the City has the option of either requiring a land dedication for park, or the City can collect park dedication fees for purchase of park land at another location — referred to as "cash in lieu". The Park, Arts, & Recreation Commission's consideration is related to a recommendation for this allocation. Under Minnesota statutes, the City may set this fee to be equal to the value of raw land no later than at the time of final plat — this is the value of raw land that is immediately developable, but is not yet actually developed. At this time, only residential plat projects are subject to park dedication in Monticello. Dedication is currently set at 11% of the land or cash - in -lieu equivalent. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION With the proposed conditions identified in Exhibit Z, staff believes that the application is consistent with the prior approvals considered by the City Council in January of 2020. As such, staff recommends approval of Alternative 1, for approval of each of the three decisions for Zoning Ordinance Amendment/Rezoning, Development Stage PUD, and Preliminary Plat for Twin Pines Addition. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2021-047, Rezoning to PUD B. Resolution PC-2021-048, Development Stage PUD C. Resolution PC-2021-049, Preliminary Plat D. Ordinance No. XXX E. Aerial Image F. Project Narrative and Revised Narrative G. Preliminary Plat H. Site & Civil Plans Floor Plans J. Building Elevations K. Parking Plans 7 Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 L. Plan Response Letter M. City Engineer's Letter, dated December 2nd, 2021 Z. Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Kjellberg/Firm Ground PUD Rezoning, Development Stage PUD, Preliminary Plat Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 6` Addition 1. Site plan additions are made per the staff report (primarily signage and sign monumentation) to reinforce the entry and circulation to the residential area. 2. The Preliminary and Final Plat are found consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, including verification that all easements and association maintenance aspects of the mixed -use Outlot A area are addressed. 3. The Preliminary and Final plat shall include all easements, including perimeter easements per the direction of the City Engineer. 4. The applicant is required to supply a cross -parking agreement with the adjacent office building over Outlot A. Submittal of association and/or common area easement documents is required. The documents shall be subject to the review and comment of the City Attorney. 5. Each of the underground parking spaces are included in the rent set for specific units. 6. The property owner submit the required petition for vacation of drainage and utility easements over Outlot A, to be re-established on the plat per the City Engineer's direction. 7. The approved PUD provides attached or internal trash handling, rather than the detached trash enclosure area per a revised building plan and narrative. 8. The landscaping plan is revised consistent with any changes to the site plan to maintain plant quantities and buffering. 9. The circulation routes through the project are reviewed to ensure safe travel for residents and commercial tenants in all areas of the project site, including directional signage related to discouraging traffic through the veterinary office building to the west. 10. The grading and drainage plans are revised to preserve usable patio and green space in the south courtyard, rather than being sloped or utilized for stormwater retention. 11. The site plan is revised to comply with the comments of the fire department staff for code compliance, circulation and public safety aspects. 0 Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/2021 12. The applicant prepare and submit signage plans that incorporate existing signage, provide for consolidated entrance monument signage and avoid additional freestanding sign displays. 13. The applicant prepare and submit lighting plans, including attention to existing commercial site lighting that acknowledges the change in use and residential needs of the property. 14. The applicant provides amended plans consistent with the requirements of the City Engineer's letter, dated December 2nd, 2021. 15. The applicant enters into a PUD and Plat development agreement at the time of final plat. 16. The applicant complies with additional conditions as recommended by other City staff and Planning Commission. 10 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-047 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE "TWIN PINES PUD DISTRICT", AND REZONING A PARCEL FROM B-4, REGIONAL BUSINESS TO TWIN PINES PUD DISRICT WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to replat and develop an outlot to create a multifamily residential development and parking and access; and WHEREAS, the is consistent with the land use designation for a portion of the property as Commercial -Residential Flex, and the applicant seeks to rezone the land consistent with the proposed plat; and WHEREAS, the PUD rezoning accompanies requests to plat and develop the parcel; and WHEREAS, subject to approvals for the land use and plat actions, the proposed PUD zoning is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for residential uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of the PUD zoning regulations, subject to conditions recommended by the Planning Commission and required by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 71", 2021 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The zoning amendment provides an effective means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by providing for the development of multifamily and commercial uses in appropriate locations. The proposed improvements on the site under the development plans are consistent with the needs of the land uses in this location. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-047 3. The improvements will facilitate the logical application of existing municipal public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4. The development plan proposed with the amendment is consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the City's zoning regulations. The amendment provides an opportunity to support mixed uses that will facilitate a variety of land uses in the immediate area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the PUD zoning ordinance and rezones the subject property to the Twin Pines PUD District. ADOPTED this 71" day of December, 2021, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Paul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-048 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FOR THE TWIN PINES ADDITION PUD DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to subdivide and develop a previously platted outlot to create a multifamily residential development and an outlot to be reserved for future commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted requests zone the land consistent with the proposed plat to a PUD zoning district; and WHEREAS, the PUD rezoning incorporates a request for PUD Development Stage review and approval; and WHEREAS, subject to approvals for the land use and plat actions, the proposed Development Stage PUD is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for residential uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Development Stage PUD is consistent with the requirements of the proposed zoning, subject to conditions recommended by the Planning Commission and required by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 7t", 2021 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The PUD provides an effective means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan designation of the site as Commercial -Residential Flex by providing for the development of multifamily and commercial uses in appropriate locations. The proposed improvements on the site under the PUD are consistent with the needs of the development in this location. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-048 3. The improvements will facilitate the logical application of existing municipal public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4. The PUD is consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the City's zoning regulations. 5. The PUD provides an opportunity to support district -wide and common improvements that will facilitate a variety of land uses and public spaces in the immediate area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Development Stage PUD for Twin Pines PUD District, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. Site plan additions are made per the staff report (primarily signage and sign monumentation) to reinforce the entry and circulation to the residential area. 2. The Preliminary and Final Plat are found consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, including verification that all easements and association maintenance aspects of the mixed -use Outlot A area are addressed. 3. The Preliminary and Final plat shall include all easements, including perimeter easements per the direction of the City Engineer. 4. The applicant is required to supply a cross -parking agreement with the adjacent office building over Outlot A. Submittal of association and/or common area easement documents is required. The documents shall be subject to the review and comment of the City Attorney. 5. Each of the underground parking spaces are included in the rent set for specific units. 6. The property owner submit the required petition for vacation of drainage and utility easements over Outlot A, to be re-established on the plat per the City Engineer's direction. 7. The approved PUD provides attached or internal trash handling, rather than the detached trash enclosure area per a revised building plan and narrative. 8. The landscaping plan is revised consistent with any changes to the site plan to maintain plant quantities and buffering. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-048 9. The circulation routes through the project are reviewed to ensure safe travel for residents and commercial tenants in all areas of the project site, including directional signage related to discouraging traffic through the veterinary office building to the west. 10. The grading and drainage plans are revised to preserve usable patio and green space in the south courtyard, rather than being sloped or utilized for stormwater retention. 11. The site plan is revised to comply with the comments of the fire department staff for code compliance, circulation and public safety aspects. 12. The applicant prepare and submit signage plans that incorporate existing signage, provide for consolidated entrance monument signage and avoid additional freestanding sign displays. 13. The applicant prepare and submit lighting plans, including attention to existing commercial site lighting that acknowledges the change in use and residential needs of the property. 14. The applicant provides amended plans consistent with the requirements of the City Engineer's letter, dated December 2nd, 2021. 15. The applicant enters into a PUD and Plat development agreement at the time of final plat. 16. The applicant complies with additional conditions as recommended by other City staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 7t" day of December, 2021, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Z Paul Konsor, Chair 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-048 ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-049 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE TWIN PINES ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to subdivide an previously platted outlot to create a multi- family residential parcel; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted requests to rezone the land consistent with the proposed plat; and WHEREAS, subject to approvals for the land use and zoning actions, the proposed Plat is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for residential and commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Plat is consistent with the requirements of the proposed zoning districts, subject to conditions recommended by the Planning Commission and required by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the proposed Plat is consistent with the City's subdivision ordinance, subject to those recommendations of the City Engineer for easement and recommendations for park dedication; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 7t", 2021 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The Plat provides an effective means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by provided for the development of multifamily and commercial uses in appropriate locations. The proposed improvements on the site under the Preliminary Plat are consistent with the needs of the development in this location as parcels in the area. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-049 3. The improvements will facilitate the logical application of existing municipal public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4. The Plat is consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the City's zoning regulations. 5. The Plat provides an opportunity to support development that will facilitate a variety of land uses and public spaces in the immediate area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Preliminary Plat for the Twin Pines Addition, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. Site plan additions are made per the staff report (primarily signage and sign monumentation) to reinforce the entry and circulation to the residential area. 2. The Preliminary and Final Plat are found consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, including verification that all easements and association maintenance aspects of the mixed -use Outlot A area are addressed. 3. The Preliminary and Final plat shall include all easements, including perimeter easements per the direction of the City Engineer. 4. The applicant is required to supply a cross -parking agreement with the adjacent office building over Outlot A. Submittal of association and/or common area easement documents is required. The documents shall be subject to the review and comment of the City Attorney. 5. Each of the underground parking spaces are included in the rent set for specific units. 6. The property owner submit the required petition for vacation of drainage and utility easements over Outlot A, to be re-established on the plat per the City Engineer's direction. 7. The approved PUD provides attached or internal trash handling, rather than the detached trash enclosure area per a revised building plan and narrative. 8. The landscaping plan is revised consistent with any changes to the site plan to maintain plant quantities and buffering. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-049 9. The circulation routes through the project are reviewed to ensure safe travel for residents and commercial tenants in all areas of the project site, including directional signage related to discouraging traffic through the veterinary office building to the west. 10. The grading and drainage plans are revised to preserve usable patio and green space in the south courtyard, rather than being sloped or utilized for stormwater retention. 11. The site plan is revised to comply with the comments of the fire department staff for code compliance, circulation and public safety aspects. 12. The applicant prepare and submit signage plans that incorporate existing signage, provide for consolidated entrance monument signage and avoid additional freestanding sign displays. 13. The applicant prepare and submit lighting plans, including attention to existing commercial site lighting that acknowledges the change in use and residential needs of the property. 14. The applicant provides amended plans consistent with the requirements of the City Engineer's letter, dated December 2nd, 2021. 15. The applicant enters into a PUD and Plat development agreement at the time of final plat. 16. The applicant complies with additional conditions as recommended by other City staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 7t" day of December, 2021, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. to] ►1110aIXil1/_1►1►11►cctto] LTA 11[►�1Eel 01 Z Paul Konsor, Chair 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-049 ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE TWIN PINES PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-4, REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO TWIN PINES PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: LOT 1 BLOCK 1; TWIN PINES ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: (--) Twin Pines PUD District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Twin Pines PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for multiple family residential land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Twin Pines PUD District shall be multiple family residential uses as found in the R-4, Medium -High Density Residential District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2022, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to residential uses as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Twin Pines PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the R-4, Medium -High Density Residential District shall apply. (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner ORDINANCE NO. of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (P)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B-4, Regional Business District to Twin Pines PUD District, Planned Unit Development: Lot 1, Block 1, Twin Pines Addition Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2022 ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor W Request for Rezoning to PUD, Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat Created by: City of Monticello Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 6th Addition 1155221000010 1 !'FIRM OROUN� architecture I planning I interior design "Your well-built project begins and endures on Firm Ground" November 19, 2021 City of Monticello Community Development Attn: Angela Schumann 505 Walnut Street, Suite Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Angela, For your review are Firm Ground's application items for the property described in the attached Land Use Application form. These responses have been reviewed and updated from the applicant's first PUD Development Stage submission from November of 2019. • A listing of contact information including name(s), address(es) and phone number(s) of: the owner of record, authorized agents or representatives, engineer, surveyor, and any other relevant associates Owner of record: Kent Kjellberg 1000 Kjellberg's Park Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: 763-295-2931 Email: Kiellbergspark&gmail.com Owner's Development Consultant: Christopher Haas 2680 Sneling Ave N, Suite 100 Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: 612-810-4227 Email: c.haasgkwcommercial.com Owner's representative (Architect) Tom Wasmoen 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, MN 55405 Phone: 612-819-1835 Email: twasmoen(cfirmgroundae.com Civil Engineer & Surveyor Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com rkFIRM GROUND architecture I planning I interior design Civil Site Group Patrick Sarver 4934 W. 351h Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Phone: 612-615-0060 Email: psarver(ccivilsitegroup.com A listing of the following site data: Address, current zoning, parcel size in acres and square feet and current legal description(s); o Address: site does not have a street address; it is located on School Boulevard immediately east of the Walmart located at 9320 Cedar Street. The Parcel ID is 155221000010 o Current zoning: B-4 o Parcel size: 152,151.33 square feet, 3.49 acres o Current partial legal description: Sect-14 Twp-121 Range-025 MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 6TH OUTLOT A • A narrative explaining the applicant's proposed objectives for the PUD amendment, and public values that the applicant believes may be achieved by the project The applicant seeks to build a 93-unit apartment building that offers a modern, comfortable and convenient lifestyle for renters in Monticello. With the consistently full occupancy of the nearby Monticello Crossings, we believe that another multi family development of this scale would be a benefit to the community as another distinctive living option. We are proposing a mix of studios, I bedroom, 2-bedroom and 3-bedroom units. Most units will either be 1 bedroom or 2 bedrooms. Main access to the building will occur at the main entrance under a covered drop off that faces north. This is accessed from a driveway from School Boulevard to the north that also serves the existing businesses in the parcels on the interior borders of the property in question. A green space will project north from this covered drop off that will give the building an enhanced sense of arrival. The site access between these two parcels (one of which is also owned by Mr. Kjellberg) and the proposed development will be designed to maximize ease of access and efficiency. Ramp access to the below grade parking level is located on the eastern half of the building while surface parking will be provided in front of the building. Pedestrian pathways will be provided across the site to connect all the Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com rkFIRM GROUND architecture I planning I interior design entrances as well as outdoor amenity space. This site design will facilitate a distinguished and attractive living destination while also accommodating and strengthening the adjacent businesses. The design intent of the new building is to apply the latest technology, materials and trends in lifestyle housing in an appealing combination that will capture a certain timelessness and be fresh and attractive for years to come. Materials will be selected for their durability, constructability and textural appeal. A combination of brick, glass, and fiber cement siding will create an interesting fagade and low maintenance exterior finishes. The proposed material palette is both contemporary and dignified. Dark grey brick and rhythmic white paneling are accented by areas of the warmer sandstone -textured fiber cement and sleek vertical ribbed fiber cement. It is important to create a dynamic and balanced facade with the way in which the materials accent each other. The proposed site plan aims to create a sense of arrival and entry while minimizing the impact on the existing businesses and parking lots. The specialty pavement radius and signage/landscape feature at the north end of the parcel will create an efficient and safe means of navigating to the businesses and apartment building. The center of the radius carries the potential of establishing an attractive and dignified arrival to the development. This sense of entry is reinforced with the canopy over the main pedestrian entrance to the proposed building. Overall, this site plan minimizes wasteful and costly demolition of the existing pavement on site, creates a compact surface parking lot dedicated to residents and facilitates ample space for a surface pond feature at the southern low point of the site for stormwater. We believe this layout reinforces the destination of an attractive, modern building while also proving highly practical and responsible. 93 units in the project allow us to dedicate space to a club room and lounge for social activities to support the creation of a sense of community. These rooms will provide comfy and cozy space, filled with natural light and a hearth to create a focal point and sense of place. The mailboxes will be incorporated into the area to further create opportunities for spontaneous social interactions and tables, chairs and a coffee server will be located in this area to give people a reason to tarry in the space a bit longer and enjoy the company of their neighbors. Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com rkFIRM GROUND architecture I planning I interior design Exterior space will include a patio with built in BBQ grills, trellis or other space defining elements that make the patio both attractive and useful. This space is envisioned as another bustling social gathering space for residents and friends to unwind and relax with one another. With an attractive contemporary building and units design, this proposed project has the potential to be a popular addition to Monticello's renter housing market. We believe it will enhance Monticello's businesses by attracting younger renters and families to the community who seek modern housing amenities in a growing and charming community near the Twin Cities. • A listing of general information including the number of proposed residential units, commercial and industrial land uses by category of use, public use areas including a description of proposed use, and any other land use proposed as part of the PUD o 93 proposed residential uses o The sole proposed use for this site is the 93 unit apartment building with associated resident amenities and parking. We are also proposing re -calibrating parking for the existing businesses on the north part of the land to work concurrently with our site circulation and access as shown in our Civil plans. • Calculation of the proposed density of the project and the potential density under standard zoning regulations, including both gross density and net density, accounting for developable and undevelopable land. Undevelopable land shall include all wetlands, floodplains, sensitive ecological areas identified in the Natural Resource Inventory, slopes greater than 18%, poor soils and areas of concentrated woodlands o While a survey or soil borings has not yet been completed at this stage, we do not anticipate any undevelopable land on the parcel o The survey calculates a parcel area of 3.49 acres, with which our proposed 93 units provides a unit density of 26.65 units/acre, which doe exceed the R-4 maximum density of 25. We are seeking flexibility to allow this additional unit/acre ratio. • Outline a conceptual development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the project, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed (including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas) Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com rkFIRM GROUND architecture I planning I interior design o Ideally, we'd be targeting an early spring (2022) construction start assuming final City approvals and final plat happen at the January and February City Council meetings. Typically for a project of this size, we'd expect a 12 month construction timeframe. • A listing of the areas of flexibility from the standard zoning sought through the use of PUD design. o Following the R-4 zoning standards, we believe we will meet building setback and design standards. We'd be seeking flexibility with regards to the density as discussed above, as well as the parking standards. We have proposed 93 units in order to maximize the economics of a multi -family building at this site. Similar to our 2019 PUD application, we would not be able to achieve the parking requirement of 2.25 stalls/unit and are seeking flexibility to provide 1 stall per bedroom instead. o We would be seeking flexibility regarding roof design- it is our understanding that a pitched 5:12 roof is required. To achieve the aesthetic we have envisioned, we would ask for flexibility to have a flat roof with parapets. Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com !'FIRM OROUN� architecture I planning I interior design "Your well-built project begins and endures on Firm Ground" November 19, 2021 City of Monticello Community Development Attn: Angela Schumann 505 Walnut Street, Suite Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Angela, For your review are Firm Ground's application items for the property described in the attached Land Use Application form. These responses have been reviewed and updated from the applicant's first PUD Development Stage submission from November of 2019. • A listing of contact information including name(s), address(es) and phone number(s) of: the owner of record, authorized agents or representatives, engineer, surveyor, and any other relevant associates Owner of record: Kent Kjellberg 1000 Kjellberg's Park Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: 763-295-2931 Email: Kiellbergspark&gmail.com Owner's Development Consultant: Christopher Haas 2680 Sneling Ave N, Suite 100 Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: 612-810-4227 Email: c.haasgkwcommercial.com Owner's representative (Architect) Tom Wasmoen 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, MN 55405 Phone: 612-819-1835 Email: twasmoen(cfirmgroundae.com Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com rkFIRM GROUND architecture I planning I interior design Civil Engineer & Surveyor Civil Site Group Patrick Sarver 4934 W. 351h Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Phone: 612-615-0060 Email: psarver&civilsitegroup.com A listing of the following site data: Address, current zoning, parcel size in acres and square feet and current legal description(s); o Address: site does not have a street address; it is located on School Boulevard immediately east of the Walmart located at 9320 Cedar Street. The Parcel ID is 155221000010 o Current zoning: B-4 o Parcel size: 152,151.33 square feet, 3.49 acres o Current partial legal description: Sect-14 Twp-121 Range-025 MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 6TH OUTLOT A • A narrative explaining the applicant's proposed objectives for the PUD amendment, and public values that the applicant believes may be achieved by the project The applicant seeks to build a 93-unit apartment building that offers a modern, comfortable and convenient lifestyle for renters in Monticello. With the consistently full occupancy of the nearby Monticello Crossings, we believe that another multi family development of this scale would be a benefit to the community as another distinctive living option. We are proposing a mix of studios, 1 bedroom, 2-bedroom and 3-bedroom units. Most units will either be 1 bedroom or 2 bedrooms. Main access to the building will occur at the main entrance under a covered drop off that faces north. This is accessed from a driveway from School Boulevard to the north that also serves the existing businesses in the parcels on the interior borders of the property in question. A green space will project north from this covered drop off that will give the building an enhanced sense of arrival. The site access between these two parcels (one of which is also owned by Mr. Kjellberg) and the proposed development will be designed to maximize ease of access and efficiency. Ramp access to the below grade parking level is located on the eastern half of the building while surface parking will be provided in front of the building. Pedestrian pathways will be provided across the site to connect all the Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com rkFIRM GROUND architecture I planning I interior design entrances as well as outdoor amenity space. This site design will facilitate a distinguished and attractive living destination while also accommodating and strengthening the adjacent businesses. The design intent of the new building is to apply the latest technology, materials and trends in lifestyle housing in an appealing combination that will capture a certain timelessness and be fresh and attractive for years to come. Materials will be selected for their durability, constructability and textural appeal. A combination of brick, glass, and fiber cement siding will create an interesting fagade and low maintenance exterior finishes. The proposed material palette is both contemporary and dignified. Dark grey brick and rhythmic white paneling are accented by areas of the warmer sandstone -textured fiber cement and sleek vertical ribbed fiber cement. It is important to create a dynamic and balanced facade with the way in which the materials accent each other. The proposed site plan aims to create a sense of arrival and entry while minimizing the impact on the existing businesses and parking lots. The specialty pavement radius and signage/landscape feature at the north end of the parcel will create an efficient and safe means of navigating to the businesses and apartment building. The center of the radius carries the potential of establishing an attractive and dignified arrival to the development. This sense of entry is reinforced with the canopy over the main pedestrian entrance to the proposed building. Overall, this site plan minimizes wasteful and costly demolition of the existing pavement on site, creates a compact surface parking lot dedicated to residents and facilitates ample space for a surface pond feature at the southern low point of the site for stormwater. We believe this layout reinforces the destination of an attractive, modern building while also proving highly practical and responsible. 93 units in the project allow us to dedicate space to a club room and lounge for social activities to support the creation of a sense of community. These rooms will provide comfy and cozy space, filled with natural light and a hearth to create a focal point and sense of place. The mailboxes will be incorporated into the area to further create opportunities for spontaneous social interactions and tables, chairs and a coffee server will be located in this area to give people a reason to tarry in the space a bit longer and enjoy the company of their neighbors. Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com rkFIRM GROUND architecture I planning I interior design Exterior space will include a patio with built in BBQ grills, trellis or other space defining elements that make the patio both attractive and useful. This space is envisioned as another bustling social gathering space for residents and friends to unwind and relax with one another. With an attractive contemporary building and units design, this proposed project has the potential to be a popular addition to Monticello's renter housing market. We believe it will enhance Monticello's businesses by attracting younger renters and families to the community who seek modern housing amenities in a growing and charming community near the Twin Cities. <<Additions to narrative, December 2, 2021>> Furthermore, City staff has requested some clarification to be included in this narrative regarding some site design elements, which are described here. On the northeast portion of the developed area, there is a trash enclosure indicated south of the Kjellberg Office Building. This trash enclosure is solely for that existing office building- it is indicated on the removals plan as being relocated to accommodate our new site circulation for access to the apartment building. This trash enclosure will be built to match its existing state. The proposed apartment building has two dedicated trash rooms for its residents: one on the first floor and one in the parking garage level. Staff has also requested, in writing, confirmation that the property lines as shown on the civil plans and plat documents will not change. The plat document proposes official and binding property lines if approved, so this text is meant to serve as further written confirmation of that fact that they will not move. Finally, please note on the submitted civil site plan that there is a "No Entry" sign located on the west side of the curved stamped pavement area between the apartment development and existing veterinarian office to discourage residents from using that parking lot for site circulation. <<End of additions to narrative>> • A listing of general information including the number of proposed residential units, commercial and industrial land uses by category of use, public use areas including a description of proposed use, and any other land use proposed as part of the PUD Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com rkFIRM GROUND architecture I planning I interior design o 93 proposed residential uses o The sole proposed use for this site is the 93 unit apartment building with associated resident amenities and parking. We are also proposing re -calibrating parking for the existing businesses on the north part of the land to work concurrently with our site circulation and access as shown in our Civil plans. • Calculation of the proposed density of the project and the potential density under standard zoning regulations, including both gross density and net density, accounting for developable and undevelopable land. Undevelopable land shall include all wetlands, floodplains, sensitive ecological areas identified in the Natural Resource Inventory, slopes greater than 18%, poor soils and areas of concentrated woodlands o While a survey or soil borings has not yet been completed at this stage, we do not anticipate any undevelopable land on the parcel o The survey calculates a parcel area of 3.49 acres, with which our proposed 93 units provides a unit density of 26.65 units/acre, which doe exceed the R-4 maximum density of 25. We are seeking flexibility to allow this additional unit/acre ratio. • Outline a conceptual development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the project, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed (including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas) o Ideally, we'd be targeting an early spring (2022) construction start assuming final City approvals and final plat happen at the January and February City Council meetings. Typically for a project of this size, we'd expect a 12 month construction timeframe. • A listing of the areas of flexibility from the standard zoning sought through the use of PUD design. o Following the R-4 zoning standards, we believe we will meet building setback and design standards. We'd be seeking flexibility with regards to the density as discussed above, as well as the parking standards. We have proposed 93 units in order to maximize the economics of a multi -family building at this site. Similar to our 2019 PUD application, we would not be able to achieve the parking requirement of 2.25 stalls/unit and are seeking flexibility to provide 1 stall per bedroom instead. Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com rkFIRM GROUND architecture I planning I interior design o We would be seeking flexibility regarding roof design- it is our understanding that a pitched 5:12 roof is required. To achieve the aesthetic we have envisioned, we would ask for flexibility to have a flat roof with parapets. Firm Ground Architects 275 Market Street, Suite 368 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 612.819.1835 info@firmgroundae.com www.firmgroundae.com PRELIMINARY PLAT: TWIN PINES FIRST ADDITION \9s4 L ♦ / sss` �, 12„ 1 �� 99 L- CB � 49y C �oJ �''9J, cgs 9 s2 , a i < �' \ rn RJR \ 0 Tc, sss2 O r0 n TCc9, • G \ _ l A ' Boa / / v / 9s6 ss 9 X / R M19 9666g \ a 6 TC<g646C'9 /Invx9339S1 6 > / (Re�prcis CFO X � V Qlj ' � TC"96323 cu �/ rn " / / TCL,9 ��o 'n,� 965 68 / NCO fa -962 83 � � � rner //in 96435 NI \ 96 65 I / , R 1 (0t- 64� a / `�' � °�nv9�s�` -Drainage and Utility co � Easement over all of 4° / 9ss o° °� rn� OUtIOt A � 5 � E / i -� �� i -" DIP o <n SYN \ \�� �~� T�9S4/8 4„ L� / Z, �A C8R q„ T Y R OT \ g„ rn SMH 62 / IJ / s/ �\��^(� \`J��sssy�3` t \ N,3 4900 AN /� 5A3 o �Fe \ \ '' 23„w \ (Pe420�NJ ° I m / \ _ / ✓ / N 68� \ . , / g _J I/V NOTE c / j ��° \cry I i� / ° �VDE CO S RiM / a C o sss r% / rn 4" _ ( 9666F •+. ^i T P\ °4� Cl�ge A , 50 rn i\ \'J� �E \ ^ e ` o I h s5849 /n 468 a \, �p h(v�5g�y/6( \ t� i� ti` Q I I a R�oros) s( T' o < / / / ^ / / 6� S9 of, rJ' g .10 8 0/1 14 R 9' �\aS2/V Y9 7 96s 46 �h 6'O�M55 I9 .0co)\o�0 / 231 I� 3 v 967 40 m f y 69 I I re / (- - S�3 9\ �e w 900 z T�u9B5a°>° \ °nc/os 6�9\O�1FN4j60�Xg 5 I�N16I�II \ 3�qZ,—o w 221, w \ rn fo / 24. 9;ti g65 -5-3 96h V/ \6 X ds T LC/ o N� SPP/ R,� >> M /nv=95 a68/8 T / / / / / �6 �� 96292 CIR v Y jo, o�h \ \ / X S P V d /ISMH R < 0m=96 a 6 X/ I9 26 �� N sc0 Z S , EJ 96S�2 / y6278 I X I gcy8\ I / / S�'\ i \ A \ Rim,H98 / I 0� / 200 „/ 60 X I I _ I \ \ I 90� / / � 1 m � PF� 5 / 41' '{ ��6`h2� \ �Ig\6\9 \ a6g52 J I ( - \\ I I ❑T \— I / x /� rn 2� `° 06 e X x�65 / ^N66o �5„ SP� 6\ k5 / X'r2�'1 \---963- xI SP�7�o /xg60 �5")SSPR/ 6 14 // \ 6/ X \ o/ry Ib I -t A XP Ix 95abl S6 \ �}' < r < 5 40,E I I \ ' � - / I�l� '// 0�0'F X962 / \\ 9677` 4 SP g\ 95960 < / 3 i5 X�62 I 1 95957 k S028 XcO-\ e�4"ISPPo Z I X 96\55 9 X y9 5a U\X9h9c \ 4 SP / Xa 373 0%\ \ \ a g62 L6 6 9y9 �'S 96L U� X 95,, uy& v\ \ J/ / I c�9y6 /0 6 '139 I e 6 C anl;�7/ .I.. 552� PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 6th Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. Abstract Property Parcel 2: Non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress as contained in Reciprocal Driveway Easement and Maintenance Agreement dated September 12, 2011, reorded January 26, 2012, as Document No. A1193270. Wright County, Minnesota Abstract Property DATE OF PREPARATION: 11-15-2019 OWNER/APPLICANT: Kjellbergs Business Center Incorporated BENCHMARKS: Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut hydrant located on School Blvd, having an elevation of 968.10. AREAS: OUTLOT A= 43,307 Sq. Ft. or 0.9942 Acres Lot 1 = 109,630 Sq. Ft. or 2.5106 Acres Total = 152,937 Sq, Ft. or 3.512 Acres FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 270534 0015 B ,effective date of August 4, 1988. Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET C�OVRO SRO�e M O M IP ,ivil Engineering • Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O ,'I- LO LO N Z Ln i C r ■� Z � o O C CD (0 V co L_ 4- 0 O fn co �Q) V � ■ CV O LU W U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Y L. S LIEN DATE 11-15-19 LICENSE No. 44565 QA/QC FIELD CREW . DRAWN BY JRN REVIEWED BY UPDATED BY 1 /.-\ VICINITY MAP 1 Linetype & Symbol Legend SITE FO FIBER OPTIC SIGN ❑a AIR CONDITIONER Qu UTILITY MANHOLE Gas GASMAIN ® BOLLARD QS SANITARY MANHOLE WATERMAIN © ELECTRIC MANHOLE " SANITARY SEWER STORM MANHOLE n STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN ° FLAG POLE HU FLARED END SECTION" ® ROOF DRAIN TEL TELEPHONE LINE GAS VALVE ❑T TELEPHONE BOX ELE ELECTRIC LINE REVISION SUMMARY TELEPHONE MANHOLE HANDICAP SYMBOL CTV CABLE LINE DATE DESCRIPTION x CHAINLINK FENCELINE ® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER �O' HYDRANT 11 WOODEN FENCELINE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL Ow WATER MANHOLE oo— GUARDRAIL © CABLE TV BOX g WATER VALVE a CONCRETE SURFACE ELECTRICAL METER -0- POWER POLE © GUY WIRE PROJECT NO.19332 PAVER SURFACE GAS METER CONIFEROUS TREE PRELIMINARY PLAT • FOUND IRON MONUMENT BITUMINOUS SURFACE O SET IRON MONUMENT 0 DECIDUOUS TREE 0 CAST IRON MONUMENT GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE SURFACE V1 0 ■ COPYRIGHT 2019 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. MONTIC LLO, MINN SOTA ISSUED FOR: CITY R SU MITTAL Culver's Sherwin-Williams pplebees Grill + Bar Paint Store am 25 to r / Chiba Buffet Aspen Dental Buffalo Wild Wings r I r" J f 191118q, 0 SITE LOCATION MAP AlN ARCHITECT: FIRM GROUND 275 MARKET STREET, STE. 368 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 PHONE: 612-819-1835 WWW.FIRMGROUNDAE.COM ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-615-0060 SURVEYOR: CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-615-0060 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: TBD ALDI 9 Dollar Tree Walmart Bakery / ft%, 5cbool Blvd Monticello Pet Hl (Pita] C�1 Walmart Supercenter I / I / / / a / / 4 0t.. 777 Mille en Belinda van Beek 4 Q SITE LOCATION DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER: Owner of record: Kirk Kjellberg 1000 Kjellberg's Park Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: 763-295-2931 Email: Kjellbergspark@gmail.com Owner's Business Partner Angie Wehmhoff 1000 Kjellberg's Park Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: 763-272-3387 Email: angiewehmhoff@hotmail.com Owner's Development Consultant: Christopher Haas 2680 Sneling Ave N, Suite 100 Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: 612-810-4227 Email: c.haas@kwcommercial.com SHEETINDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C0.0 TITLE SHEET V1.0 SITE SURVEY C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C4.0 UTILITY PLAN C5.0 CIVIL DETAILS C5.1 CIVIL DETAILS L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1-1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILS SW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS SW1.2 SWPPP - DETAILS SW1.3 SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1.4 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1.5 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS 0 0 0 Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 FIRM GROUNE) Cl) FM z w FM 2 a a FM z 0 2 Q0 C`7 L0 CU') G J LU O J m O O U U) N CD M L0 L0 CZ G 00 6L LU W Z 2 J W a_ LLJ LU J J Y O O O T— I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Mayhew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION TITLE SHEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. J 11/8/2021 1:38:16 PM ©COPYC 0 0 0 RIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP IK \\'96 SI9 96, M /(q00 cas B/o A scvsss35s33 46j/c /1 2,3 -e / . 9r '`oc, G,q�. T • 6552 , � � � I CIO Tc, 9s56a Z O sss0 Z�0 '9s4g8 9UX l sMN a 9 O 7. Rim�451 9s4.9s .00 TC_9646J�/9339iR /> l�\ f 17 ya C!/,g6 �Ords� p nna aa,a a r r r r al h m s I F u ti a \ T- <r , .. � C— T h h 9 ........... .................. ^ Te,...........:.�.�.�.�..::�.:::�.:}:: -.fin A��'n om _��h,965g '.�=96 63.23 ..................................83 .................... B 2. f$�1::i:i??;::;7 n e .9ss 60 a �u'� / nerfall ,��',..�c3� > / ,n M 96 �. 1?i?}:'::.: Opp. _9res 64.35 J �.\....:: ` 0J No. '11 s 1� �� /�Rom\ -� /! e !r ��sss g3z gent vl /9° / N. -964 (C :. e9*.'` Y0 / _.J, �0 oo`°. 1�_/ pCC _ Sidewalk 2S O1 I k/ M na g6 g { r0 Doc. Nok101 en?entPer / FF` 3 n� \ S05 02 f SASS /15 �� /E 96j45 ^Q �� \ `r n C' 8" DIP 31 LOs? �Q ) Parcel ID /°ICa°". ,e t' o b; 155207001010 LV .. c3� �c1/ / / &„ sMy - 4° L0C `o - �6 Property Address ! M ( / %C, 9 4465 : a'a952.001 0 41' P y h 9320 CEDAR ST �\„ / / �ti N MONTICELLO �V a �l=` /w (��a R 4 �r 966 s„ AN .' S $MH ro`Z ' ....4i , ��/� �V �nvys08g N� 0 0.0 ' 1��0 • 0 0) . a m �0 9 .3 �'-95 a \ w � 9 in;_ °pf „ '. T o b F �u o Q 23 W (P 9as.20f �7 c , Fe. tea, p p er R NI 9s>5o o/ • a2 3 ; �� N 6°`O'�) t/ S o Gj r �o Ch Q v'.c�i n`� 966.72 .......... a m „ a c l a o / i a S s O n 0 < G7.5 ,ri .�. ......% o / 965 - 4. ^:` ., 9666 -� Sp a .. TMH= T - ,v �. Ci'ige �-��j i`y - 6 { CBR 968.16 ,� Y. ��a ""•'�} j 46* F' 7 ......... . s � s( � (R N z' M M k fill a �i ° ! Gi 5g, X \f�� m �s l Parcel ID R^� gb i .... .'�` emu' oag�595' 4Z.3 /(0 a•S / 155147000010 0 s67.40 4764 TNH- S Trash 3"E r �g / w 96672F! r �g0 X9653 ,569 a �6g8q 547 nCI osure X a X96��9 t 17" SPR Z� 9 14 VJ o '(0 o a 3" �IAK Zcc V a / 965 33 v I / / 969 q9 00 ti Q X 9 / 4.6.6 'X X1185 8" /PIN 9� 96� \ / \ X I'� / r� , a i� l e / r- �� �� 1/ i, r- � , -,- r- r� T o J� oD� CBR )) ..... .... ci ,i .i a-, v �_ .i .i ,i �_ , v , �_ a , 7„ PIN �/ 6 $ Z lnR. ,.-958>8 III"`aaa <i �U T / \ / g63 _ X 96292 / X5" ASH Z/ I I �1(Rec�) �(b I / 0 X / O / I g662 I / 0 46,E ys M 4„ B S (O X 962?9 V rn s� / ca 16" BA Zr' I Z /'24X /X9 ( ainage and Utility Easement Over t aN �,� s3o X96" / 6" PR 1. a All of Outlot A (Per Plat) Ell] r �nvg ei 4 uo/ CBRN / 1 (� ,Zk9 Rimo=963.2 -�) iS) SP,R Z I M Z $MFI I l a' I 1 X46 // Im�56.03(5� -, ( In ohs° 1 O) / (Records) I (7 i J 7 , X S °, rsr• 25, 1 $PR ,2 / MN 965 2 g62.78 I 9�g1 I / / 6,� rt� Jam/ I 963�0 Ri52 \ / �90i X 9 I X X I „ cs m�.Op TNI/ X / ° s46 /5„ 6PR Z/ / 5 PR Z/ ( H X �/ / \ \ \ \ �S6rJ•---X 652� v`�9y 966-ea 5„ SD` X 9 5� S �R Z CO K 60 X 5� SP r0" NC) `_ .•�� l.i i iX ID"iSPR , �' /^N ` i"'IN 9 X3°0 / I 4\ I 7 SP�t o `' / r' r' com_ 1 y5 I 6 ! o � g95� X <�'/ / ' X '5 I // g�96� S6 \ / / 'I5„ SyR'Z I IX 9590,\ 400 �r r 1Z / JI \ 0�0/� �\ X962cA 10�lT� ,� 4"ISP ! 36 959.60 ( 6029 X �^ X � S� /R63s � \ / X \I ) 959.57 9 J J 28 Sys (R�o X 4'I SPf�t Z I 4611 045 X°s ST b d ) X 961hh (R 97 .\ 9 V� / h9y9 \ J 9 X9hg \ ab ) r(sFII 4'\SP � / X GNU \ $T \ � /yU X 959. � \ \ v . / // � \....9 T / �gb Oyu \ O 959 \ ��3 69 22a g5 hU X \ X 9 \9 / /� � 9bIN 0yU GNU v \04 / 95e�° O 5960 \ O 9 % SMH \ S Rm=9,:9.77/ /X96920 hg2'` O U _v958.7 Inv�937.17 / X95,, V V DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Parcel 1: Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 6th Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. Abstract Property Parcel 2: Non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress as contained in Reciprocal Driveway Easement and Maintenance Agreement dated September 12, 2011, reorded January 26, 2012, as Document No. A1193270. ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Notes (numbered per Table A) 1. Bearings are based on the Wright County Coordinate System (1986 Adjustment). 2. Site Address: 4134 School Blvd Monticello MN 55362. 3. This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 270534 0015 B, —� effective date of August 4, 1988. 4. The Gross land area is 196,028 +/- square feet or 45.002 +/- acres. 5. Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut hydrant located on School Blvd, having an elevation of 968.10. As shown hereon. 6. The current Zoning for the subject property was not provided. Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 9. The number of parking stalls on this site are as follows: 68 Regular + 4 Handicap = 72Total Parking Stalls. 11. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our abilitybased on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility 9 9 p Y companies, plans provided b client markings b utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities P , P P Y 9 Y Y PP 9 for this site. However, lackingexcavation the exact location of underground features cannot be accurate) completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed 9 Y, P Y Y P information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. 13. The names of the adjoining owners of the platted lands, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from Wright County GIS. SURVEY REPORT 1. This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Servion Commercial Title, as agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, File No. 059394, dated October 14, 2019. We note the following with regards to Schedule B of the herein referenced Title Commitment: a. Item no.'s 1-9, 12, 14, 16 and 17 are not survey related. b. The following are numbered per the referenced title Commitment: 10. Terms, conditions, obligations and easement for ingress and egress purposes as contained in Reciprocal Driveway Easement and Maintenance Agreement dated September 12 2011 recorded January26 2012 as Document No. A1193270. As shown heron over the middle portion ofproperty. P J 11. Drainage and utility easement as shown on the recorded plat of Monticello Business Center Sixth Addition. As shown hereon over all of Outlaot A and part of Lot 1. 13. Storm drainage easement for in favor of the City of Monticello as contained in Quit Claim Deed recorded April 28, 1997, as Document No. 616770. This easement does not appear to affect subject property. 15. Terms and conditions of and easement for public sidewalk purposes in favor of the City of Monticello as contained in Grant of Permanent Easement dated June 12, 2006, recorded June 28, 2006, as Document No. A1015455. 2. Conflicts such as (but not limited to): encroachments, protrusions, access, occupation, and easements and/or servitudes: [A] Storm information shown in the undeveloped area was taken from a site utility plan prepared by Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC, dayed June 4, 2007. ALTA CERTIFICATION To: Firm Ground: This is to certify that this.4nap or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly ed and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 13 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on 10-08-2019. Dated this th of October, 2019. Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET G R O V P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com N to IUD Z 0 O Q c.i O LL 2 LO O Ln L0 Z O O_ M O C C 00 (0 00 0) U) W Y (0 LO ti N W ~ Z W d U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NESOTA. RORY L. SYNSTELIEN DATE 10-11-19 LICENSE No. 44565 VICINITY MAP Linetype & Symbol Legend SITE Fo FIBER OPTIC SIGN ❑A AIR CONDITIONER UTILITY MANHOLE GAS GASMAIN ® BOLLARD QS SANITARY MANHOLE WATERMAIN © ELECTRIC MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER ST STORM MANHOLE G7 >> STORM SEWER ® CATCH BASIN o- FLAG POLE OHu OVERHEAD UTILITIES Q FLARED END SECTION ® ROOF DRAIN TEL TELEPHONE LINE GAS VALVE ❑T TELEPHONE BOX ELE ELECTRIC LINE REVISION SUMMARY �T TELEPHONE MANHOLE HANDICAP SYMBOL CTV CABLE LINE DATE DESCRIPTION x CHAINLINK FENCELINE ® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER e(� HYDRANT 10-24-19 Title Commitment WOODEN FENCELINE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL Qw WATER MANHOLE oo— GUARDRAIL © CABLE TV BOX g WATER VALVE a CONCRETE SURFACE OE ELECTRICAL METER POWER POLE © GUY WIRE PROJECT NO.: 19332 PAVER SURFACE GAS METER - CONIFEROUS TREE ALTA/NSPS LAND • FOUND IRON MONUMENT BITUMINOUS SURFACE O SET IRON MONUMENT TITLE SURVEY 0 DECIDUOUS TREE G CAST IRON MONUMENT GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE SURFACE V1 0 ■ COPYRIGHT 2019 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ' " 1 r i i Y i IJroperTy Haaress / / 4/ / / - �_ / /, 65 SAN 5 , > �\9520o r 7 9320 CEDAR STa�ITT M ONTI CELLO \°��a l 66 $ �sA I / -� ° gr / /M� �� 96 z Q\°/ / d ° d V' hV / \ � 7L. i � /\ I, ° y d ° / ` � W / vi co`OR%mo t• � / / " Q / i v 1 - / \ 1 / I C as d TNry+ / T / j968.16 Z ° , M-964.06/ qtW/ REMOVE EXISTING / PAVEMENT .1 I I Il \ M I / I nv, 9. V �(s"' REMOVE EXISTING PAV / AND BASE MATERIAL A I I / I= PARKING SIGNS, TYP. l MAILBOX. REMOVE & RELOCATE. COORDIN TEI � WITH OWNER. Parce Td,s Envc os 15514 REMOVE AND SALVAGE 966.72 v EXISTING HYDRANT / REMOVE EXISTING v� SMH 66C�OSU CURB AND Rlm,964 V % GUTTER, TYP. lnV'95?� 4 REMOVE A ND SALVAGE EXISTING HYDRANT I a Oila % 3" OAK Z / EXISTING TREES TO / J h /� o Z REMAIN, PROVIDE i j ��2 / 7 / TREE PROTECTION REMOVE EXISTING / ( xg6( / / // ;' FENCING, TYP. xg6 X/ // $ STORM PIPE 0)8" PAN Z xg6 / rn 6" SPR Z c8R L V1 V L L - V L - 1 7" PIN Z n 4 r- i` i` r- n l -l- r - �l 1 I / � � � / - � / � / v � � l I I I g63 " 6�.9z X 5" �1­11 Z i i REMOVE EXISTING TREE Qa vv I & BALL ROOT, TYP. CONSTRU vfION LIMIT �c! / / / // // x �5 �� %V I I 4" BAS Z � 1 I x /�� rn / / 6"EASz1 /I / I V � / X�6� (/ P(ainage /bnd Utility, -Easement Over xg6� 6" SPA z / All of 0/tlot A Oer Plat) [11 CBR m=963.03 4)" /// / II I // / I REMOVE EXISTING / s SPR Z� / sMN CATCH BASIN �3.80 0)I I I x X2 �' / I Rim=963.44 \ I lw aver 25- deep N 6" /PR Z S (. s, e) rn \1 / / 962.7s' I I I A / / / A x� jo SPR Z / /* R 2. \v/ X96 sil 66a0 /5" sPR z / s.�o // / II I � � � � � I " // /i Il �\ \\ �\\ II \ \ 1 5" SPIR/ z H 1/ ❑ X96\\ �\ �\ \ �` "66,g \ Xge�52 / x\ / REMOVE EXISTING rn I � 66a " / I 5 R Z/ STORM PIPE V 965 x �2 1 5SPR 964- - - - - - - - - - / �' x96, / ------ / / 5"/SPR Z 0 / / / ^ / _ / 963 X / l l- -ll / / 1 /r / lr / / /// l l / l ln\ l 15" S¢R Z / / / / / / \l / / / / / i , n A l l l I /-1 L/ L/ l y l �/ l v I / / A,) CEO 961 - - 4. x xo5 96 i I 5� SPR Z ' / / ,4.'� 4. 4. /� 5" SPR Z I"PRIz //j I REMOVE EXISTING TREE \ ZO & BALL ROOT, TYP. \ REMOVE EXISTING ,,I 961 CATCH BASIN ' I \\4" S�R z� I/ \� g6o25 x REMOVE EXISTING J� 4" SPR Z STORM PIPE / / CBR /N Rim=963.77 / 4" SPR Z EXISTING CATCH BASIN Rim=963.73 �\ V '\ TO REMAIN, PROTECT FROM DAMAGE EXISTING STORM PIPE TO REMAIN, PROTECT OF=958.33 FROM DAMAGE967 REMOVAL NOTES: 1. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 3. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 5. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF -SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 6. ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 7. EXISTING ON -SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 8. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 11. PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 12. SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 13. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 14. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 15. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 16. STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. CITY OF MONTICELLO REMOVAL NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 REMOVALS LEGEND: --------- - _--------- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL E==ZH REMOVAL OF ALL BASE ERIAL, INCLUDING BITACONC.,AND GRAVEL PVMTSTAND REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT. TREE PROTECTION TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS 0 � 0 N Know what's below. 1" = 30'-0" Callbefore you dig. 15'-0" 0 30'-0" 11/8/2021 1:38:37 PM 0 0 0 R 7 H 0 q � (KFI M (CD M P Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 FIRM GROUNE) & 011gi ,'-I s N Q0 (y) L0 O J LU Z J m O vJ'U'^^ N CO M L0 CL0 G 00 6L LU IlI Z J W � lY a_ LLJ m J LU O O T_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION REMOVALS PLAN C1 0 ■ COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. zZ ; 6°32� d� W� � SEE ETAIL 1 FOR NORTH WALNNECTION VIEW%~' NN s s.a9 �120. s R "$�a.sl d [ �• �R 45FQ MATCH EXISTIN �'�L> j s\ 964 �ATCH tXf�.1ll�'6s�y(R ✓ R'm, \/ � SA TYP. ' °ids) a° / / s� ,a 4 ' inv o9e3 PVMT, TYP. N ° ° ° b / qJ cb 966.12 �5 CONC. WA�,/ P / �` �, MATCH EXISTING / v �AS' v �P' / �� / �, C&G, TYP.3" LOC SMH 4" LOC or*v11-965.01 4 d MATCH 03 - PVIJ ,0 TyP. r°B612 C&G, g(RecO ds - NP3° / Rt » / 23"W � 6.16 / Y e ic95 Ing55Q li FFE_ E 1 " = 40'-0" I / /- 20'-0" 0 40'-0" / / / MATCH EXISTING PVMT, TYP. R / nv>gs0 �6(N co '�° O / O NORTH SIDEWALK CONNECTION �'i4-STONE / % 1 4, MINI -COLUMN -` LL B612 C&G, ` / / o, MATCH EXISTING TYP. = % `� / PVMT, TYP. Q 2� MATCH EXISTING ' o 0 /PVMT ` C&G, TYP. I Parcel ID BIT. PVMT.�! N 2 1551470C Rim=964.06 TYP (BR 4-STONE GO0 �28 �' MINI -COLUMN S *w / cc TRASH ENCLOSURE, Wi "NO EXIT" Q `SEE ARCH. / IGNAGE IGN 4•'7 / (5) ST 5po-1 71 1 1 1,[ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S� ,N PVMT. STRIPING 90' Ca 450, TYP. Qom• SPE IALT R5 / �10JSTgC`S PAVEMENT S / @9'` it % » v COD - O C$R \ '> / / 93 S8F/�\ �•01 ��0 i:T1^ / Ij Inv>g568ecordsCIO ' / CO WA / P. � 9 � ,11 l � 233 � CONSTRUCTION LIMITS / �e�� �� SSF 6'� F \ S9 'CF oeey 2 ALL PARKING AREAS WILL BE COVERED BY ASSUMED CROSS ACCESS PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT. N1 TURNING MOVEMENT ;ITY OF MONTICELLO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: / is �Fo oOl / SITE LAYOUT NOTES: a ssss - �rOR°� ��� �� ��� 20 (CROUHO SRO�e C7 m Oo \ p Civil Engineering , Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 FIRM GROUNE) r ♦ � <<1� O♦ Cl) G FM z W C.0 N M L0 N � co z (y) z O J LU O � Q U J W _ J m ~ U J O Q J o LU O 2 Q J > W ° VW U FM o 0 z0 r �O U w SNOW REMOVAL: O d ALL SNOW SHALL BE PUSHED TO LANDSCAPED AREA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS TRASH REMOVAL: PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY / VV SF M 128 ° TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR AT THE EXISTING LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL, TYST Fg � RI,„_ssa.ao 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH ENCLOSURE AREAS, COORDINATE WITH UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FP. � o IF-sz 0 Inzs• dip E) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED T0, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. MINNESOTA. s 22' R36.0' S UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE DELIVERIES: / SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE / z / CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE / MAILROOMS , ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. COORDINATE WITH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. DATE 11/8/21thew R. Pavek LICENSE NO. 44263 0 a o0 963SF �T°�F B .PVMT., / 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TYP STREET OPENING PERMIT. ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY � s iso / \ \� TRgSN B612 C&G �eF TYP,. / �� 1 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF gs33 60, eep qN \ / ❑T SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. SITE PLAN LEGEND: / zeFO 4� 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND \ /ss3S� / OUTDOOR . e o - 0 1 / APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEE � AMENITY eFO ¢030� �2.�. SPACE 43 / -� 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & s'SS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL. \ ' / ARCHITECT. HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & 30 0 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. 40, / LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL. WALKWAY / / / PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT - - PROPERTY LINE PATIO, TYP. PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. M M M M M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS / REQUIREMENTS -SEE DETAIL. CURB AND GUTTER -SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE -SEE PLAN TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS j V / OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. SITE AREA TABLE: ` / / 10. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES -SEE DETAIL. t t* TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS / SITE AREA CALCULATIONS / / 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ` / 3'/ EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED CONDITION t C / 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. BUILDING COVERAGE 13,843 SF 7.1% 42,128 SF 21.5% ` I IMPROVEMENTS. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN � � \ \ NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ALL PAVEMENTS 40,220 SF 20.5% 74,220 SF 37.9% 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. ST = STOP ALL NON -PAVEMENTS 141,965 SF 72.4% 79,680 SF 40.6% _ INFILTRATION BASIN 1 CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY � � J BOT-954.33 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. TOTAL SITE AREA 196,028 SF 100.0% 196,028 SF 100.0% `©- _ I / TOP=957.33 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. O EOF=958.33 Ifl 1 -YR HWL= 7.7 16. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 0 • 00 95 0 N IMPERVIOUS SURFACE VOL=(954.33-956.13)=10,941 CF o � / VOL-(9564.13-957.33)=20,298 CF 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. EXISTING CONDITION 541063 SF 27.6/ EOF=958.33 - SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. Know what's b@IOW. 1" = 30'-0" PROPOSED CONDITION 1161348 SF 59.4% DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 62,285 SF 31.8% Call before you dig. 15'-0" 0 30'-0" 11/8/2021 1:38:52 PM RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. css s 9 �1Z 20 o l Rinti \ ca a.gs 0 �+'i Inv>gg(Recods r i �-Cor � ner fall in M 964.35 { P 3' LOC / y I V /cow o H 'V � Rm'g65.01 �I OC ��`ti - A) O•00 Inds 30 9 W 23,R Inv 4 0(w (Per ece2,d(s)) O 4 N ) �I0` FFE, 3 E m 966 >z ❑T LEI W O ° sss ss � b o Rim,95 � e. /nvg55849 (Records) 1U 'o 0 2 o Parcel ID 4 155147000010 M , Rim: \ » 10eoords) OPERATIONAL NOTES: DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP I PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN C200 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP IK CONSTRUCTION LIMITS LL 811 / 962.52 v / MATCH a`O TNH- 96,PO / 963., / M / Cr 962.► / MATCH ` / C5 / 960.49*% MATCH I / //g? \ / Rey J MATCH 7/ Q d d P d / 0, / / A �i / / / C'l d ° ° TNry= / T / LL a OAS 1A I / �g ��> \�A 962 64 C 961.26 - MATCH CID I -Y I / aai CeR Rim-- I/nv,gs6s(Reoords SMH Rit%j..80 /nv Over 25- deep iN S. E T `- INFILTRATION BASIN 1 �956 I / BOT=954.33 95> TOP=957.33 958 / EOF=958.33 959 100-YR HWL=957.70 VOL=(954.33-956.13)=10,941 CIF I/ IVOL=(956.13-957.33)=20,298 CIF MATCH EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 CITY OF MONTICELLO GRADING NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW -LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 7. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 11. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS. 13. TOLERANCES 13.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.2. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 14. MAINTENANCE 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. GRADING PLAN LEGEND: EX. T CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL ""'-41.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS 891.00 ME SPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING GB GRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=1135.52 0 `a a Know what's below. Call before you dig 4 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 N 29" / 21 1:39:01 PM (CROUHO SRO�e (7m Oo M p Civil Engineering , Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 LLI O FIRM GROUNE) Cn FM z w FM 2 am a 0 J J W U H z O 2 N CO LO LO J LU Z G J m J O O U U) N CO M LO LO 00 6L LU Ill Z J Ill Y Q a_ VJ LLJ m J J O O O T_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION GRADING PLAN I ■ COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP IK 155207001010 a j \ ,�\` /� � ^ �/ ��196418 ' 11 Property Address 964. / / / :65 a / \ N 9320 CEDAR ST °� ° ` / / �/ a �\ ` F MONTICELLO / i tl �� - 11 I � " ?Z%xo It" � Q. J 44� If A �o /� l / / I Cib At�" / o� zj/ / ^ \ ®\F F CR2 01 s 1N+ / T / Cl / / qB App ^ N 966.16 / ' / / ' �y 4% �Co C) MAKECONNECTION T EXISTING/ `-O/ // /} �� MAKE CONNECTION TO JAI. � / 4 ^\ / ij O l EXISTING WATER MAIN STUB, SANITARY SEWER STUB EX IE (NE/SW)=959.77(AB) COORD. WITH CITY (FIELD VERIFY)PROPOSED HYDRANT PROP IE (SW)=959.77°�F``\ / AND VALVE, TYP. 1 `` COORDINATE WITH CITY FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING INVERTS PRIOR TO EXISTING MHO CONSTRUCTION RIM=963.82 �\ If' I R 4� EX IE=95J'1,� LF 8" PVC SDR 26 �0 ` PR IE- 5� 9.17'', q(m--ssa.os/ / SA ARY SERVICE ° ` '� 22 / @ 2.00% I 1 / CB 2 ' 4 1=965.18 I E=961.50 7„ 87LF18"HD E STORM @ 1.00% `O (0 / ALV AN VALVE BOX v 1 I rn ^ 1 / / 1 / CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ♦ / 6�a / JC lur- 01INI 1 UL5 /S �sy ''QF <oa \,/ r> \ e Xe6 / I ' t + fl, , y X e �A I I , , E dpp r eep ,eof / COORDINATE ANY REQUIRED STORM PUMPING SYSTEM w/ MECHANICAL ENGINEER z9 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION / ssa � I \ I I 8'/ g62� ALL FINAL UTILITY SIZES, MATERIALS, LOCATION, AND 9 \ / // I I CONNECTIONS TO BE F. \ �.�0 // / I I VERIFIED BY A MECHANICAL TRgsti ENGINEER AND COORDINATED WITH CIVIL , X96\\ \�\ PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. \\ 965 964 = / STUB BLDG SERVICE TO 5' 63 _ �/ /� BLDG. COORC * W/ MECH'L PRI CONSTRIL IE= I > ----------- 961 --/\5 I I ^ X 4 14 LF 10" SCH 40 PV I 9 l STORM @ 2.00' / I IX / I I� °k \ \ w\ X 10� RECONFIGURE EX CBMH TO OS OS 1 CASTING R-4342 PROP. RIM=956.13 EX IE(S)=951.78 (FIELD VERIFY) ^Inv 9 01 ° > \ > \ 966 811 SAN r� I 1 O / �So �� 1 I 6gEjz E / 'oI I 1 I / (� / / 4 1 caR R, S8. Ilnvag58 r�Re�ords� I I 1 1 I I I CBMH 22 RIM=961.59 IE=957.23 SUMP=953.23 over 25' deep (N, 5, E J /r1%Ir_r1%r>,r_ )1', I / �N 76 LF 21" HDPE CURB CUT STORM @ 2.93% 0 / FES 20 0 /W/ RIPRAP / / / / E / IE=955.00 n' // / / ! i N / . / I j l 4� V / DAYLIGHT BLD I I I / STORM IE=955.00 1 I 959.60 959.57 I/ I J INFILTRATION BASIN 1 I / BOT=954.33 TOP=957.33 / EOF=958.33 ` 100-YR HWL=957.70 VOL=(954.33-956.13)=10,941 CIF EOF=958.33 / VOL=(956.13-957.33)=20,298 CIF GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE -USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 181, VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE -DRILLED. 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. CITY OF MONTICELLO UTILITY NOTES: 1. THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED THAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS. ELEVATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. RIPRAP SHALL BE GROUTED PER CITY SPECIFICATIONS. UTILITY LEGEND: CATCH BASIN MANHOLE ►/ GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT I WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER FES AND RIP RAP 0 fl 0 AllN Know what's below. 1" = 30'-0" Call before you dig. 15-0" 0 30'-0" 11/8/2021 1:39:11 PM \UH00SRO�e C7 m Oo M p Civil Engineering , Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 FIRM GROUNE) & 011gin"-rs N CO M 'L0 L J 00 6L LU W 2 Z J W a_ LLJ J J LU O O O T_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION UTILITY PLAN C400 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. THIS OCCURS ONLY WHERE MULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALK LEAVE TOP OF MULCH DOWN 1" M FROM TOP OF WALK / FINISHED,GRADE ° d ° TOOLED CONTROL JOINT SEE DETAIL (TYP.) LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC WITH 3" WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED EDGE 5" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE TO AN ON -SITE A.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED. 2. SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. 3. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 4. SEE CONCRETE JOINT DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS. 5. 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS. CONCRETE WALK/PAD N T S (PRIVATE PROPERTY) 1.5" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B) NOTE: SECTION IS FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION. COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT N T S TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) 2" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B) 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE (MNDOT 3138) 3" RADIUS CORNERS 8 12 1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER 112" RADIUS 6 3/4"l1' 0.5% SLOPE -CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPE FINISHED GRADE GUTTER (T.O. GUTTER) WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB. SEE PLAN FINISHED GRADE NOTES: v 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT G,��cd ° n 10'-0" O.C. +/- a a ° 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON o �o SOIL CONDITIONS /tea C CLASS V AGGREGATE SUBBASE SEE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL (6" MIN.) B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER N T S METAL SEWER CASTING REFER TO STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPE MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE. STORM SEWER PIPE - SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION, INVERT, AND SIZES BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH CATCH BASIN N T S "RIM ELEVATION" PRECAST COVER - 8" THICK STEPS - INSTALL ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE @ 16" O.C. RUBBER GASKET - TYP AT ALL JOINTS PRECAST CONCRETE SECTION GROUT SHELF AND CHANNELS DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB (BOC) TO CENTER OF PIPE: 4' DIA. MH - 9" IN FROM BOC 5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BOC 6' DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BOC T DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BOC 8' DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BOC COVER SHALL BE STAMPED METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TO "STORM SEWER" STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPE MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND l ALONG OUTSIDE. SIN DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB (BOC) TO CENTER OF PIPE: 4' DIA. MH 9" IN FROM BOC 5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BOC U DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BOC T DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BOC 8' DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BOC STORM MANHOLE N T S PRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTION STEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE GROUT SHELF AND CHANNELS BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH HYDRANT MARKER HYDRANT, HEIGHT VARIES I m TRAFFIC FLANGE FINISH 2" ABOVE GRADE REFER TO DETAIL $ GRADE \ C5.0 I Lu Lu 0 z U z I � 4" x 4" VERTICAL BLOCK 4" x 4" - THRUST BLOCKI I 8" CONCRETE -\-� 2-3/4" TIE RODS LTHRUST BLOCKS 1 CU. YD. GRAVEL 3/4"+ COVER WITH POLYETHLENE FIRE HYDRANT N T S PLUGGED CROSS A, PLUGGED TEE lll lllll-lu- I-I llll �- 111=ll1=ll1=ll1 PLUGGED CROSS TEE 1/4" PLYWOOD OVER FACE Al I OF BOLTS PLUG OR CAP NOMINAL FITTING SIZE (INCHES) TYE, WYE, PLUG, OR CA 90' BEND, PLUGGED CROSS TEE PLUGGED ON RUN 45' BEND 22.5° BEND 11.25' BEND Al A2 4 1.0 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.0 - - 6 2.1 3.0 4.3 3.0 1.6 1.0 - 6 3.8 5.3 7.6 5.4 2.9 1.5 1.0 10 5.9 8.4 11.8 8.4 4.6 2.6 1.2 12 8.5 12.0 17.0 12.0 6.6 3.4 1.7 14 11.5 16.3 23.0 16.3 8.9 4.6 2.3 16 15.0 21.3 30.0 21.3 11.6 6.0 3.0 18 19.0 27.0 38.0 27.0 14.6 7.6 3.6 20 23.5 33.3 47.0 33.3 18.1 9.4 4.7 24 34.0 48.0 68.0 48.0 26.2 13.6 6.8 NOTES: 1. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING TO BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH. 2. KEEP CONCRETE CLEAR OF JOINT AND ACCESSORIES. 3. IF NOT SHOWN ON PLANS, REQUIRED BEARING AT FITTING SHALL BE AS INDICATED ABOVE, ADJUSTED IF NECESSARY, TO CONFORM TO THE TEST PRESSURE(S) AND ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING STRESS(ES). 4. BEARING AREAS AND SPECIAL BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN ON PLANS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER BEARING AREAS AND BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN THIS STANDARD DETAIL, 5. ABOVE BEARING AREAS BASED ON TEST PRESSURE OF 150 P.S.I. AND AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING STRESS OF 2000 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. TO COMPUTE BEARING AREAS FOR DIFFERENT TEST PRESSURES AND SOIL BEARING STRESSES, USE THE FOLLOWING EQUATION: BEARING AREA = (TEST PRESSURE/150) X (200/SOIL BEARING STRESS) X (TABLE VALUE). THRUST BLOCK N T S 6" RADIUS 12" DIAMETER 6" LINE WIDTH 3" LINE WIDTH 5-6" SQUARE OVERALL 18" RADIUS ALL COLORS TO MATCH ADA STANDARD COLORS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAVEMENT MARKING ADJUST TOP TO 1/2" BELOW FINISHED PAVEMENT GRADE OR 1" BELOW FINISHED TURF GRADE. SET SO AS TO PROVIDE 12" OF UPWARD ADJUSTMENT. z J a Lu I- FLu LD -LL J Lu DLu Zo ww ou- 0 a r AS REQUIRED GATE VALVE BOX N T S DIA + 3' COVER SHALL BE O O O STAMPED WITH "WATER" (CRY11SR (KFI m Oo M P Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture FINISH GRADE 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 VALVE BOX civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 GATE VALVE REFER TO DRAWINGS Irk G R O U N D FOR SIZES �Fuilii2cts �& Ilgiii-, WATERMAIN G� CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK MATERIAL V-6" (MIN) NOTES: 71.II-I I nnn7E 1. INSULATION BOARD TO BE CLOSED CELL. EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM MEETING ASTM 578, TYPE VI, 40PSI COMPRESSING STRENGTH (ASTM D1621) 0.1%MAX. WATER ABSORPTION (ASTM C272). 2. BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND INSULATION MUST BE FINE SAND FREE FROM ROOT, ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR OTHER INJURIOUS MATERIALS. 3. OVERLAP ALL INSULATION BOARD JOINTS. UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAIL N T S EXTEND POST PAST TOP OF POST GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP. OF 2) METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO MN STATE CODE V THICK IRD (USE 2-2" MASTIC ALL JOINTS aTION BOARD DOWN EPTH. GREEN POWDER COATED STEEL SQUARE POST AS SPECIFIED z z c� 6" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINTED WITH 1 Lu in COAT OF APPROPRIATE PRIMER AND TWO COATS �2Lo SIGN ENAMEL. FILL ANNULAR SPACE WITH GROUT. o ¢ COVER WITH YELLOW "IDEAL SHIELD" PLASTIC O p N COVER. Wm 10 DEGREE SLOPE MATERIAL VARIES -SEE PLAN ° d 1 INCH SILICONE RUBBER -_ ° -_ -_ OR ASPHALTIC CAULKING III -III ° III-III=III= COMPOUND -I I -I I I I-� I FILL ANNULAR SPACE TO 1 INCH M -I I II I II I II I d d, I II I I= I- - FROM TOP WITH SILICA SAND III -III , - 1/4" METAL PLATE WELDED TO II II I II I ° I III � III BOTTOM OF 6" PIPE Ed I I=I I ° ,d ° -_ I I= III -I CONCRETE FOOTING AS SPECIFIED _ -I NOTE: 1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED. 2. VERIFY POST PAINT COLOR WITH LANDSCAPE - V-6" ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POST N CO M L0 Z 2 V/ O 6L W W Lj Z J W W m J O O O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS C500 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. N T S N T S 11/8/2021 1:39:16 PM L 12" Bc/4 but not less than 6" 6" L Bc/4 but not less than 6" _II —III-6 Compacted Backfill Bc - 0 513 ill 2000# Concrete O 1513c l — - LOAD FACTOR 2.3 Bc+12" Minlll "Bc" Denotes outside CLASS A diameter of pipe Concrete Backfill to 0.5 of outside diameter with shaped bedding. Compacted Backfill 0:5B& + i t Course Filter Aggregate ++++++++++ ++—IIIII- MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod. ==111=III=1 1= I- LOAD FACTOR 1.9 Bc+12" Min. Bc" Denotes outside 111-111 CLASS B diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material _ Compacted Backfill _II�IIIII,_ LOAD FACTOR 1.5 "Bc" Denotes outside CLASS C-1 diameter of pipe Hand shaped from firm undisturbed soil Compacted Backfill c + + + ll l l l- Course Filter Aggregate ++ +�+ + + + —Ijl- MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod. -11 CI-11I-11 CI I- I- LOAD FACTOR 1.5 "Bc" Denotes outside CLASS C— 2 Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NTS + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 12" - + Jill + + + + + + + + + + I; -I + + + + + + + + I- =1 + + + Bc + + + +I + + + + + + + + + + + + l 6„ — + + + + F Compacted - Backfill Min.=Bc+12 "Bc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe Compacted Backfill Granular Borrow (MnDOT Spec. 3149A modified) PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + =1 + + + + + + + + + + + + 1= Bedding —1 + + + + + + Bc + + + + + + 1= + + + + + + + + I— ;I + + + + + + + + + + I; Foundation —I �V/a�a0,le/ "Bc" Denotes outside Minimum diameter of pipe 2d+Bc+12" 12" C.� Course Filter Agg. (MnDot Spec. 3149H Modified) PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN POOR SOILS PIPE BEDDING - PVC NTS COVER SHALL BE STAMPED "SANITARY SEWER" METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TO STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPE MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE. MIS PRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTION 27" " SIN ti STEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE SIN r RUBBER GASKET -TYP 1 MIN. 12 AT ALL JOINTS SLOPE AT 2 IN./FT. (TYP) Lu a RUBBER BOOT CIO ILOW RUBBER ' BOOT BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH SLOPE @ 2 IN./FT. TYP) ul\uul IV I/L rIrL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE N T S ADJACENT CURB, SEE SITE AND GRADING PLANS GRASS PRE-TREATMENT STRIP OR PRE-TREATMENT STRUCTURE, SEE UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE PLANS --FEE -III III IIIII _� UNDISTURBED UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOILJI I 1 1111 NET LESS EROSION BLANKET IN BOTTOM OF I 1 BASIN. SLIT BLANKET TO ALLOW PLANT MATERIAL SURFACE IF PLUG PLANTING IS TO BE USED, SEE GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS MIN. PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 24" WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE (BY VOLUME): 70% HOMOGENOUS CONSTRUCTION SAND 30% ORGANIC COMPOST CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING 3H:1 L MAX. 7 r 24" CONSTRUCTION SAND (UNDER ROCK WINDOW ONLY) COVER SHALL BE STAMPED METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TO "STORM SEWER" STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPE MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE. 27' i PRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTION 0 CD STEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB •, (BOC) TO CENTER OF PIPE: 4' DIA. MH - 9" IN FROM BOC 5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BOC 6' DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BOC T DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BOC T DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BOC 1 , g VARIABLE MIN. m Q of GROUT SHELF AND CHANNELS ' BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" ..O SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH STORM MANHOLE N T S SIDE SLOPE TREATMENTS, SEE GRADING OR LANDSCAPE PLANS SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DEPTH 6-811 CRUSHED ANGULAR RIP RAP IN BOTTOM OF BASIN PLANT MATERIAL, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST OVER EXCAVATE DOWN TO SUITABLE SOILS. FIELD VERIFY WITH SOILS ENGINEER TYPICAL SECTION VIEW 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL DOWN -GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS. 3. PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 4. INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE. 5. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER THE PRACTICE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROM CLOGGING. 6. PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 7. PLANT ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE. 8. CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA. 9. IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 10. PLANT AND/OR ROCK MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE. 11. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED. BIO-INFILTRATION BASIN (RAIN GARDEN - TYP.) GENERAL NOTES 1. IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION. 2. GRADING OF BIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW -COMPACTION EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS. 3. ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CROUHO SRO�e C7 M Oo M p Civil Engineering . Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 FIRM GROUNE) N CO M L0 LO z V/ O 6L LU W 2 z J W o� ow0 J J LLI 0 0 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS N T S 11/8/2021 1:39:21 PM C501 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP MONTI CELLO / ° / ; i/� ,a ^' ; �`' 9909� "T-�,<� ! \ PLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITE ec 0 /\ �� o / \/ � SYM QUANT. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT COMMENTS ° / 0 7/ �Fe v �� k, �� DECIDUOUS TREES (15 966.,2 NRM 5 NORTHWOOD RED MAPLE Acer rubrum Northwood 2 CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM X° ° I7 1 SHL 7 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos'Skycole' 2" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM RB 5 RIVER BIRCH Betula ni ra 2" AL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM 9 C S G U HB 5 COMMON HACKBERRY Celtis occidentalis 2" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM EKC 7 ESPRESSO KENTUCKY COFFEETREE G mnocladus dioicus'Espresso' 2" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM / I Y p 4e .1 / / ///V4� /1 / / 29 TOTAL ORNAMENTAL TREES /� ^ PFC 10 PRAIRIEFIRE FLOWERING CRAB Malus'Prairiefire' 2" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM < I 96Sso /� o ^ �// / 4. 96 66 �� ABS 14 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchier x grandiflora'Autumn Brilliance (tree form)' 2" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM / a � I T � C.� `` / � cRge ap ' �- \ � � Malus'S Tin Snow' " sss p� SSC 12 SPRING SNOW FLOWERING CRAB p g 2 CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM RBC 3 RED BARON FLOWERING CRAB Malus'Red Baron' 2" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM TH 21 THORNLESS HAWTHORN Crataegus crus-galli'Inermis' 2" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM / v / PD 4 PAGODA DOGWOOD Corpus alternifolia 2" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM 7� -RRD yR Q / I 64 TOTAL 9 co W EVERGREEN TREES I �I BHS 3 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glauca'Densata' UHT. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM 2 - RB / / I� /� / 1 1- HL I CBS 3 COLORADO SPRUCE Picea pungens UHT. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM / I I WP 2 WHITE PINE Pinus strobus 6' HT. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM TR c`to �Q 8 TOTAL E CLO RE CSR/ �I o 10 / IHD - / SL ND / R�3B2 / TH 1t'V�CCL� / '� / 11 DKL D I - SCE ING / I I I SHRUBS - DECIDUOUS & EVERGREEN /1 - EC 11 -�/DN 1 -SHL ,� BS I I // MJ 9 MEDORA JUNIPER Juniperus scopulorum 'Medora' 36" HT. CONT. ssa.os / ��o� 4 -DKL / `7` "DFG ' " 3 - MO ^ �- `2 3 1 // // AC 50 ALPINE CURRANT Rlbes alpinum 24" HT. CONT. 7 - RRD IS - / ! / DKL 72 DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringa meyerl Palibin 24" HT. CONT. I / / co 3- 5-DFG r `" / rn / f, TY 29 TAUNTON YEW Taxus x media'Tauntonii' 24" HT. CONT. DHW 53 DARK HORSE WEIGELA Weigela florida'Dark Horse' 24" HT. CONT. t / 10- D _ 1'SH � / LDN 69 LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK Physocarpus opulifolius'Donna May' 24" HT. CONT. v II / / I 1 - NRM / / 3 DKL I 'r /E IST G AH 34 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA Hydrangea arborescens'Annabelle' 24" HT. CONT. 3 SC 5 - i / — - 6 5 - Dk<L /1 - �HL I SGJ 108 SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus x pfitzeriana'Sea Green' 24" HT. CONT. / l 1 CJL 22 CHARLES JOY LILAC Syringa vulgaris'Charles Joy' 24" HT. CONT. 1 ISLAND 1: // R h ISLAND 8: -3 - RRp - IHD 91 IVORY HALO DOGWOOD Corpus alba'Bailhalo' 24" HT. CONT. 215 SF I AND 2:' - H 90 SF rn DN 40 DIABOLO NINEBARK Physocarpus opulifolius'Monlo' 24" HT. CONT. LO / 0) 1411 SHL 225 S 1 -NRM 1 -NRM I_rA95 ff9: / / / DBGS 1 DWARF BLUE GLOBE SPRUCE Picea pungens'Globosa' 24" HT. CONT. 7 RRD 5 -KL / % / DKR 24 DOUBLE KNOCKOUT ROSE Rosa x'Radtko' 24" HT. CONT. 5 DKL / / 7 - LDN 1, I / / LLH 13 LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA Hydrangea paniculata'Jane' 24" HT. CONT. 1 / 5- L 4-LDN/ / // / / 615 TOTAL \sue\sal I f 20 IHD 1 / 1 -NRM 6 RRD 3 - TH 1 / ISLAND 7:, I LAN 5: / �T, 95 SF / 7- PERENNIALS &GRASSES / 15 /� 390 S BES 18 BLACK-EYED SUSAN Rudbeckia hirta 1 GAL. CONT. V / 6 - AH 1 -NRM 1 / 1 I R BSJ 3 BLUE STAR JUNIPER Juniperus squamata'Blue Star' 1 GAL. CONT. / CWL 58 CATMINT'WALKER'S LOW' Ne eta x faassenii'Walker's Low' 1 GAL. CONT. • 1 1 _ISLAND 6: RETAINING 8 - LD' j / / I j� I p 3SJ TS°j TR 225 SF / DFG 15 DWARF FOUNTAIN GRASS Pennlsetum alopecuroldes Hameln 1 GAL. CONT. ,/ l ,83 r /� a 7- - WALL 1 / I 20 "�� i s2 08 l / 1 / KFG 24 KARL FOERSTER GRASS Calamagrostis x acutiflora'Karl Foerster' 1 GAL. CONT. 18 - RRD MO 15 'MILLENIUM' ONION Allium 'Millen ium' 1 GAL. CONT. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -EKC / �BFO\ i _SSE / 5 - 24- / I NEH 16 'NORTHERN EXPOSURE' CORAL BELL Heuchera'Northern Exposure' 1 GAL. CONT. _ sss, ' Mq�N �. -A 1 / 5 - H6o I 1 RRD 91 'ROSY RETURNS' DAYLILY Hemerocallis'Rosy Returns' 1 GAL. CONT. / �� /rl�oeay �� 240 TOTAL 8-N H I 1 - DNEFi KL ISLAND 10: I I� S/o 1, \MM8 R REST \ \ 4 / 185 SF-- LO - SG \ (4- / R. 3-TH sr � °REST , I� / ® 6-LDN .' LANDSCAPE NOTES: LEGEND , / 9,TY// s 3-SS �/ ss Fl I 'Sz ° \ 1 ISHL t SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH, SAMPLES REQUIRED / 662�/ f 1. WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH -MJ MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS OF PROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLAN 3 - SSC I /, 1 / / SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH. ROCK MULCH/RIP-RAP, SAMPLES REQUIRED �eFO 1 6 - RRq / PROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLAN - / 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH TO OUTER / 2 DN I „4 ° 6 -DHW {TOR A- \ j / EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH /i-EKC/ I 6 _ �sF I°F I l LAWN -SOD S 3' CB SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. -BH/ 1 - B�S / / ' ' ' ' * * ` SEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 34-262 WET PRAIRIE, PER / 3. IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO 2�-ABS H ...... . COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES '.'.'.'.'.'.'. MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) / < \ o r 6 - DKL / ❑ �6 - SG,� \ � \ `—,�2eFO 1, �\ �/- B PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 1" DIA. ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP OVER FILTER FABRIC, SAMPLES REQUIRED. PROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLAN / 18 _A /9630 / 12 - DKR ,I J / ; , , ;+ ;± 11 CJL 4. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF `4-TH \ / i� 7 DKL / �o`v NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM i15 -IHD 3 - SSC / - L I y /1 - D DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR s'ss N./ // ��� \ // 5 -LDN ; ; ; . ; T* +, ; ;, ,1 + / ��� MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE / / ��� / �� / 6- E$ /.'.'. /' ' // / PERIOD. PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE �o �° / 3 - ABS// AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES A$S "'9 ; ro;/; ' ' / 5. UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS / 6 -DKL SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN,HE PLAN , SHOWN ON THE 1 EKC SHALL GOVERN. T CV 15 SGJ 6. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE _ / .. / ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE I I � ----- 961 — / _ .,.,. ,. �,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS -SEE PLANT / .>�... ' ' ,/; ' ' ' ' /; MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL 1 ,^ 5 - PFC / _ /; ; ' ; ;; , , r.'.;; ; SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES / 6+ / ' / a a II rn 15 IHD 5 PF \ z \\ +'+'J( j ';�'',' ; / GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 3- F ; '.{.7. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER 1 \ 21 -A \ \' ' ' '' 'l' ' I; / TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT I I 17 -LDN 1 - RB / SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES 1 - EKC DRAWINGS. / I 15 - SGJ /: ': jlaiL..... j'+_;,�, ; 1.'.;{; ' ' / 8. COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD 3 - TH ., I (, ; PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEE I h I UTILITIES LIGHTING FIXTURES DOORS AND WINDOWS CONTRACTOR SHALL ' STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES ; ..f..., 2 - ABS APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. / I \ 3 - TH' ' ' ' J ' ' '/' ' ' ' PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT I 115 - IHD �� a \+�.'F?D.'' ��'' /\ SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES 11 CJL 9. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL `c';.�;''' ACCEPTANCE. EDGING 1 - �I�C ,�..... Y ,,,,, / ...... , 1 - RB 10. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE IY 15 -�GJ + "v CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. DECORATIVE BOULDERS (ROUNDED & BLOCK STYLE), 18"-30" DIA. H'; \; ; ; ' .. INFILTRATION BASIN 1 16 - IHD ; ' ' 11. SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED A+ BOT=954.33 TOFY=957.33 FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 12. REPAIR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER IRRIGATION SYSTEM DAMAGED FROM �1007Y-R HWL=957.70 V�SL—(954.33-956.13)-- 10,941 CIF LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. \ \� \� 13. PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM EOF=9 8.33 �/�VOL=(956.13-957.33)=20,298 CIF U SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE \� SEE LEGEND FOR PLANT TYPES \\\ 17 -S'OJ / L\\ WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE a• N \ \ 96 I / 1 - KC AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SEE SHEET L1.1 FOR REQUIRED PLAITING CALCULA TIONS \\ ^ / j // W SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB. Know what's below. 1" = 30'-0" 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM Call before you dig. 15'-0" 0 30'-0" INLCUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 11/8i2021 1:39:33 PM CROUHO sRoge CM M Oo M p ;ivil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 FIHM GROUNE) a r c h ite�3inee rs Q� � G� W N M LO N LO Z cy") LO 0 Z J O � LU U Q J _j W _ a J m ~ U J O Q J ZO W Y O �a J J C/) W 0 �m U o 2 J W WP: Y O O z o U LLI O d I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Patrick J. Sarver DATE 11/04/19 LICENSE No. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP ' PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll 0 ■ © COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. REQUIRED LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS (ZONE: PUD- "ALL OTHER RESIDENTIAL") FORMULAS TOTAL REQUIRED (ASSUME 2" CAL. EA. AT INSTALL) TOTAL PROVIDED (EA.) SITE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS (MULTI -FAMILY (5+ UNITS)) REQ'D: 16 ACI CANOPY TREES (3 EVERGREEN) PER 1 ACRE & 2 SHRUBS PER 10' PROPOSED BLDG. PERIMETER REQ'D OV E RSTO RY TR E ES 2.77 ACRES X 16 ACI = 44 / 2 CAL. IN. EA. = 22 - 8 EVRGRN 14 14 REQ'D EVERGREEN TREES 8 REQ'D 8 8 EQ'D SHRUBS (AROUND PROPOSED BLDG. PERIMETER)* 1000 LF / 10 = 100 X 2 200 200 *Existing Buildings already include foundation/perimeter plantings; no additional counts PERIMETER BUFFER REQUIREMENTS (ALL OTHER RESIDENTIAL) *DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL SITE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS NORTH BOUNDARY (B-4): TYPE B, OPTION 2 BUFFER (218 LF) - excludes drive aisles OVERSTORY 218 LF /100 LF = 2.18 X 2 ACI = 4.36 / 2 ACI 2.18 2 UNDERSTORY 14 ACI X 2.18 = 30.52 ACI = 15.26 15.26 15 SHRUB 35X 2.18 76.3 76 SOUTH BOUNDARY (B-4): TYPE B, OPTION 2 BUFFER (350 LF) OVERSTORY 350 LF / 100 LF =3.5 X 2 3.5 4 UNDERSTORY 14ACI X3.50=49ACI /2=24.5 24.5 25 SHRUB 35 X 3.5 123 123 WEST BOUNDARY (B-4): TYPE B, OPTION 2 BUFFER (330 LF) OVERSTORY 330/100LF=3.30X2ACI =6.6/2=3.3 3.3 3 UNDERSTORY 14ACI X3.30=46.2/2ACI =23.1 23.1 23 SHRUB 35X 3.30 115.5 116 EAST BOUNDARY (R-3): N/A, NO BUFFER REQ'D* (380 LF) *Overflow Perimeter Buffer Plants added to East Boundary from North & West Perimeter TOTAL PERIMETER BUFFER COUNTS (N,E,S,W COMBINED) TOTAL OV ERSTO RY TREES (N, E, S, W) - see above - 8.98 9 TOTAL UNDERSTORY TREES (N, E, S, W) - see above - 62.86 63 TOTAL SHRUBS (N, E, S, W) - see above - 314.8 315 VEHICULAR USE AREA LANDSCAPING (COUNTS TOWARDS TOTALSITE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS) INTERIOR PARKING REQUIREMENTS ISLAND TREES 1 PER ISLAND X 10 ISLANDS 10 10 ISLAND SHRUBS 25% X TOTAL ISLAND SF = 2565 X 25% = 641.25 SF REQ'D; ASSUME 3' DIA. SHRUB TYP. = 7 SF; 532.5 / 7 = 76 (S DIA. SHRUBS) 76 76 PERIMETER VEHICULAR USE REQUIREMENTS OVERSTORY TREES 8 ACI PER 100 LF OF LANDSCAPE STRIP = 243 LF / 100 = 2.43 X 8 = 19.44 / 2 ACI = 9.72 9.72 10 EXISTING ON -SITE TREES EXISTING TREES TOTAL TREES EXISITING 25 TOTAL TREES REMOVED 24 TOTALTREES REMAINING (CREDIT) 1 1 VEHICULAR USE AREA LANDSCAPE CALCS INTERIOR PARKING REQUIREMENTS ISLANDS (ISLAND N SF OF EACH ISLAND 1 215 2 225 3 205 4 640 5 390 6 225 7 195 8 90 9 195 10 185 TOTAL SF OF ISLANDS 2565 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TOTALS: TOTAL SITE COUNTS REQUIRED PROVIDED OVERSTORY TREES (TOTAL SITE REQ'D) 5.72 6 PERIMETER BUFFER OVERSTORYTREES 8.98 9 TOTAL EXISTING TREES (CREDIT) 1 1 TOTAL OVERSTORY TREES REQ'D 13.7 14 TOTAL EVERGREEN TREES 8 8 TOTAL UNDERSTORY TREES 62.86 63 SHRUBS (SITE REQ'D) 276 300 PERIMETER BUFFER SHRUBS 314.8 315 TOTAL SHRUBS REQ'D 590.8 615 FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTURE 18" - VERIFY W/ PLAN SLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAx.5:1 MIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TO VERIFY W/ GRADING PLAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FINISHED GRADE -_ STAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT WATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED -I I II I II I COMPACTED SUBGRADE AGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIP N T S PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLON STRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZING METHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR. TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE V-2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE COMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP. CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IF NON -BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK EXISTING GRADE SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS THREE TIMES WIDTH�OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT OF ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING N T S PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE FOR SPECIES) PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT EXISTING GRADE SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON THREE TIMES WIDTH- LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OF ROOTBALL OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTING N T S SIZE VARIES SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEM ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT EXISTING GRADE SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT PERENNIAL BED PLANTING N T S IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWER CONNECTIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 4. SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND METERING FACILITIES. 6. IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1%" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE. 7. ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 8. ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE. 9. ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0" BEYOND PAVEMENT. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO 2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED. 12. FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION. 13. BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS. 14. ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR. 15. GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 16. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON -SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 17. CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE. RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USE MOISTURE -PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES. 18. AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE. 19. ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE. 20. USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS. 21. A SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON -SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION. 22. ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN. 23. ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX. 24. THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE. Q 0 � Know what's below. Call before you dig. C00 ASH30eR�I C� G Oo M FP Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 IrkFIRM GROUND - _ _. _ - 'yhneers O J J LU (M) FM z �0 U Lu O d N CO CM u7 Ln J LU z m J 0 0 U W N O M L0 LO z 00 1Z LU W 2 m z J W 0- LU J J LU O O O T_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Patrick J. Sarver DATE 11/04/19 LICENSE NO. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILS L 1 0 1 11/8/2021 1:39:36 PM COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP A AY 9 ti� � / I I I I Boa / IT / '0/U % °/if / a rn I °' I /y��/ / % / �� `O� ,���° // ; INLEl1 P TE6-T 6Ale ♦ I s opis� TOH ASII� /� TYIPif 411, CI At 4 if / / / / / �• ;♦ I "0'/ /< 4 �•''•��' Par 1 16 /� � / / / • ;••. z3 155 dim=ssa.os/ / / s ••••• • 1 rn / / // 49,2 if _ / / I / // / vy 9s6.72 1 SMH ;c>966 C%)C/1 / .9 / / < an my if 4 x96k , co O) (D / / 0)a / / 3" OAK Z / / / / if / if % x�l�� 8" PIN Z x rn / r- i\ i\ /� r- n l -l- r- r� / if / 17" PIN Z6" SPR Z I I /^ L1 / \/ ♦/ l/V L— �/ ♦/ V \/ L— l V l L— l I � Rim X g6n'S'S � i I / I 956 /iR°coryy� 5" H Z CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 4" BAS Z x96 /�� ry 0) 6" BAS z / PERIMETER EROSION / ' v CONTROL AT / 9// ainage /bnd Utll Its//basement Over 6" SPA z/// ,CONSTRUCTION i 0 LIMITS, TYP. of of /der a t L11 J BR im=963.03 4" MAP Z s" SPR z I/ sMH 6d80 BR ' � l j � Rim=9 0)II I xg6 // // I INLET PROTECTION AT ti l^" 25• °gyp �N el 6" SPR Z CATCH BASINS BEING S REMOVED /r 5" SPR Z c'D \° g6 a9 / / x -O 0 / \ X / / -O �' h�9 / / ssi �o / / I I � � � 1 \ / / �i � � 5" SPR Z / // /1 I / if 1 5" SqR zo / 1 1, g6,5� \ �g \ 52 / / / / / / ❑T \ / l if � �8i l if � vJ 5" SPR Z� CV / �� / \ \ 965 — — / / / 1 / 1 5" ISPR / �) /� / rn / �if \ Q5� / \ \ \`---- // / x9i / 5- SPR Z / / / 4 963 / rn / n r� r� l -l� l I l l / ?ti X l I- -I I / 1 / 1 1 1 1 l/ l I I 15" SA Z 9---- 962 �i1 y X i 6 I ---------- 961 --/ 5 / I I .✓ ♦ / < / < / 1 L— 4 x g6/ I I P I I 5/ SPR z l / � / � /'� / 4. x 4.� < J / % / / ^ / if p I • / /// 1/ v 1 \ \\ / ifI 5" SPR Z / / I I 596 SPR Z X / I x� 981�` \ / \ I ♦ I j i I 95 0 c Ro \\ X g62 J, 4" SPR Z /I 0 1\ / 959.60 959.57 X X \ g6 • I I � vJ � 4" SPR Z I 41) p5 \ im=963. ♦ // J ,596g % ha$ \\ \\ �\\ LL 4" SPR Z / / INFILTRATION BASIN 1 Rim=963.73 \ // / BOT=954.33 \ � � / TOP=957.33 EOF=958.33 xg ��` �\\` \/ / ; / / 100-YR HWL-- 957.70 % \ \ I / ♦ VOL=(954.33-956.13)=10,941 CIF\� EOF— 958.33 ` �' f , VOL=(956.13-957.33)=20,298 CIF 4 / / 155207001010 Property Address 9320 CEDAR ST 1 d° l MONTI CELLO s/ Al / o \n/KKKKK_�/ IL s, 4" LOC =9ss.o1 0 � SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF MONTICELLO EROSION CONTROL NOTE,' 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND: -------- 1125-------- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL DRAINAGE ARROW ............``........ SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 7z- 27zz7:� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 � 0 �p0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. Ag�l 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" 11/8/2021 1:39:45 PM CROVRO SRO�e C7 m (CD M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 FIRM GROUNE) G� Cl) FM z W N co M L0 N � co z L U) L0 O LU O � U Q J W _ a J m~ U J O Q J z LU O �a J J m Wo `�LLJ V o J LU U) FM 0 ZO o U LLI O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SWPPP -EXISTING CONDITIONS swi 0 ■ © COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP IK Property Address 9320 CEDAR ST MONTI CELLO01 d�Q 511 TNY= / T / 96P.16 / `�� `p / �► e ' c� • 4 v CONSTRUCTION LIMITS I / I INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS, TYP I VV I / §01:1 0// / f / 964.06/ I 9 966 \\ \ 963 \ O sss sss 967 05 a I \ F® 96.0 \ x o ti x �o \ x \ x � E 99 2 X \ x ,)60 _ 4" LOC / =965.01 / I I I 'PERIMETER EROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. SMH Rim=g63.80 1n, over pg• deep iN S E ❑ \ INFILTRATION BASIN 1 BOT=954.33 TOP=957.33 EOF=958.33 100-YR HWL=957.70 VOL=(954.33-956.13)=10,941 CF VOL=(956.13-957.33)=20,298 CF r � / ' I /4. 1 v SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF MONTICELLO EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND: ----- 1125 -- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL DRAINAGE ARROW ■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■ SILT FENCE/BIOROLL- GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE K-7zz- 2� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET I 0 �pa Know what's below. Call before you dig. Q 1" = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" 11/8/2021 1:39:51 PM (CROUHO sRoge C7 m (CD M p Civil Engineering , Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 w O FIRM GROUNE) N CO c'7 L0 CU') G O J LU z G J m O U U) N CO M L0 L0 00 I.L LU MW W z J p J W wy' LL a_ LLJ LU J J 0 O O r I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Mayhew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SWPPP- PROPOSED CONDITIONS swimi © COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP =RFLOW IS/2 OF THE CURB K HEIGHT =RFLOW AT TOP OF FER ASSEMBLY ISTING CURB, PLATE, BOX, ID GRATE .TER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" I -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT 3H-FLOW FABRIC NO I E5: 1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEM AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT. 3. REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ERO-4C. CURB INLET FILTER N T S 30' FROM EDGE OF ROAD TO FRONT OF SPEED BUMP 35' R Q 0 I Q 0 C N 7 C A LU TO CONSTRUCTION Z I AREA U) I p Z C� PLAN 35' R z TO CONSTRUCTION AREA 6" MIN CRUSHED STONE X LU EXISTING 75' MINIMUM UNDISTURBED FINISHED GRADE 1 GEOTEXTILE FILTER F-FABRIC I I 4" HIGH, 18" WIDE /_SPEED BUMP ROADWAY PROFILE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. 2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS N T S 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH rr r r r r r r r r ®O y r r I p:f 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND'B'. OVERLAP END OF r rr TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. r r r 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. EROSION BLANKET 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. _o T TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE 00 ILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED ILLER AS SPECIFIED FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO EMBED ROLL. DIRECTION OF FLOW WOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897. 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/811 . 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. SEDIMENT BIO-ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG N T S SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4" WIRE HOOKED ONTO - PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. METAL POST AS SPECIFIED. FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CLIPS 12"O.C. IIIANCHOR FABRIC SOIL, TAMP BACKFILLH CARRY WIRE SUPPORT =NET DOWN INTO TRENCH z N � SEDIMENT FENCE N T S DIRECTION OF FLOW METAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C. MAX. 0 0 0 Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 - U LLI 0 ��`FIRM GROUND ar ufiiiGc[s cl) FM z w FM 50 am a N C0 (y) L0 J LU z J m J O U 07 N C0 M L0 L0 Z 1' � 0 O 6L LU W 2 Z J p J W a_ o� LLJ m J LU O O O T_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION SWPPP - DETAILS N T S SW1 02 11/8/2021 1:39:56 PM ' © COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP GENERAL SWPPP REQUIREMENTS AND NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SWPPP THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL 5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14) 6. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE 7. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 8. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE 9. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES 10. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES 11. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S 12. INSTALL STREET SECTION 13. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 14. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS 15. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH 16. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND 17. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.) 18. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. RECORDS RETENTION: THE SWPPP ORIGINAL OR COPIES INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT. 1. THE FINAL SWPPP; 2. ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT; 3. RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION ( SEE SECTION 11 INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE); 4. ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND 5. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON -SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE: 4.1. NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER SECTION 21 OF THE PERMIT. 4.2. DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING. 4.3. CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING. 5. FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (0 & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS SWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6): 1. ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.13 OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS. 2. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER. 3. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL. BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7): 1. PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8): 1. BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED. 2. PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING). 3. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE. 4. FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD. 5. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 6. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK -DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES 7. PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. 9. PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11. SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9): 1. PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER. 2. IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3. 3. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK -CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. 4. A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER. 5. PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 6. PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET. 7. PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G., CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER. 9. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINS ALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10): 1. PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT -LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACE WATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. 2. IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL -WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. 3. PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN -DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. 4. IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11): 1. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.13, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS. 2. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS. 3. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6. PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA. 4. DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS. 5. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS. 6. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. 7. PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. 8. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.13. 9. PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS: a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; OR b. WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; OR c. WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE: a. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; AND b. NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; AND c. ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; AND d. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); AND e. DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES; AND f. IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); AND g. ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12): 1. PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER. 2. PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. 3. PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM -BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE. 4. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035. 5. PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041. 6. PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE. 7. PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY. PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13): 1. PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE. 2. PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT. 3. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER. 4. PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED. 5. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. 6. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON -SITE IN PLACE. 7. FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET' TO THE HOMEOWNER. 8. FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. SEED NOTES: ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINAL STABILIZATION AND TO ALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET. SEED • TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. MULCH • IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH) SLOPES • 3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH • SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. • SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS. TRAINING SECTION 21 DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E. TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPP TRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN DATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011 TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12 RE -CERTIFICATION: 2/27/20 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2023 AREAS AND QUANTITIES: SITE AREA CALCULATIONS BUILDING COVERAGE ALL PAVEMENTS ALL NON PAVEMENTS TOTAL SITE AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONDITION 13,843 S F 7.1 % 40,220 SF 20.5% 141,965 SF 72.4% 196,028 SF 100.0% EXISTING CONDITION 54,063 SF 27.6% PROPOSED CONDITION 116,348 SF 59.4% DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 62,285 SF 31.8% EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES DISTURBED AREA 148,627 SF 3.41 SILT FENCE/BIO-ROLL ±1530 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 SF INLET PROTECTI0N DEVICES 7 EA OWNER INFORMATION OWNER: KIRK KJELLBERG 1000 KJELLBERG'S PARK MONTICELLO, MN 55362 763-295-2931 CONTACT: PROPOSED CONDITION 42,128 SF 21.5% 74,220 SF 37.9% 79,680 SF 40. 6% 196,028 SF 100.0% NOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP CONTACT PERSON CONTRACTOR: SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING: ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A PERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT. TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPP PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER): CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE: ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST ATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT NARRATIVE: PROJECT IS A DEVELOPMENT OF AN NEW MULTI RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT BUILDING AND SURFACE PARKING LOT. SITE, UTILITY, GRADING, AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR. NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE: PRESERVING A 50' NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WATER BODIES ARE NOT LOCATED ON SITE. INFILTRATION NARRATIVE: INFILTRATION IS PROVIDED AS PART OF THE PROJECT'S PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE: SOILS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT. SOILS HAVE BEEN ASSUMED TO NOT BE CONTAMINATED. SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED): THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ONE MILE OF ANY SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER BODIES. IF THE PROJECT WAS LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE, BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC: PERMANENT SEED MIX • FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX. •• AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE. •• DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE. • MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. co,�yo R H (KFI a o o� Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 U W 0 d ��`FIRM GROUND GROUND LnuinII-r CV (fl (`7 Ln Lo z LLI J U z O 2 J m O U W z 0 2 N CD m L0 LC) z O J V/ 6L LLJ MW 2 W z J p J 2 W Y 0- w LLJ o�o m J _J LIJ O O O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SWPPP - NARRATIVE 11/8/2021 1:40:01 PM SW1 03 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT PROJECT NAME: MONTICELLO APARTMENTS PROJECT LOCATION (BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURS. INCLUDE ADDRESS IF AVAILABLE.) ADDRESS: SCHOOLL BLVD CITY OR TOWNSHIP: MONTICELLO STATE: MN ZIP CODE: 55362 LATITUDE/LOGITUDE OF APPROXIMATE CENTROID OF PROJECT: 45.283610 N,-93.800461 E METHOD OF LAT/LONG COLLECTION (CIRCLE ONE): GPS ONLINE TOOL SGS TOPOGRAPHIC ALL CITIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: MONTICELLO ALL COUNTIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: WRIGHT ALL TOWNSHIPS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: NA PROJECT SIZE (NUMBER OF ACRES TO BE DISTURBED): 2.77 PROJECT TYPE (CIRCLE ONE): RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION RE & RD CONSTRUCTION OTHER (DESCRIBE): XXXXX CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (TO THE NEAREST TENTH ACRE) EXISTING AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 1.24 POST CONSTRUCTION AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 2.67 TOTAL NEW AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 1.42 RECEIVING WATERS WATER BODY ID I NAME OF WATER BODY I WATER BODY TYPE I SPECIAL WATER? (Y/N) DATES OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 05/20 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 10120 SOILS INFORMATION IMPARIED WATER (Y/N) MAP UNIT SYMBOL MAP UNIT NAME 1377B DORSET-TWO INLETS COMPLEX, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INFORMATION DESCRIBE THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WHAT WILL BE BUILT, GENERAL TIMELINE, ETC): A NEW MULTI RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT BUILDING, SURFACE PARKING LOT, AND STORMWATER BASIN WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. DESCRIBE SOIL TYPES FOUND AT THE PROJECT: PER WEB SOIL SURVEY, SOILS HAVE BEEN ASSUMED TO HAVE A HYDROLOGIC DESIGNATION OF "B" SOILS. SITE LOCATION MAP - ATTACH MAPS (U.S. GEOLOGIC SURVEY 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS OR EQUIVALENT) SHOWING THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL RECEIVING WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS, DRAINAGE DITCHES, STORMWATER PONDS, OR BASINS, ETC. THAT WILL RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT. USE ARROWS SHOWING THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND DISTANCE TO THE WATER BODY. ar III - - + 24° I ~hillI H... i w I - 9ClhS1 NE -- - KU -- ---- CIO 65th Si N E < - - 4 Z. GENERAL SITE INFORMATION (III.A) 1. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICIES (BMP'S). INCLUDE THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION AND PROCEDURES USED TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY. (III.A.4.A) THE PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY TWO (W) MAIN BMP'S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION DEVIDES WILL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SITE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILITZED. 2. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A TABLE WITH THE ANTICIPATED QUANITITIES FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (III.A.4.13) SEE PAGE SW1.3 3. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A SITE MAP THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING FEATURES (III.A.3.B-F): EXIST AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST -CONSTRUCTION STORMRWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND SOIL TYPES. • EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST -CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS. • LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTRUBED. • LOCATION OF AREAS OF PHASED CONSTRUCTION. • ALL SURFACE WATERS AND EXISTING WETLANDS WITHIN ONE MILE FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE (IDENTIFIABLE ON MAPS SUCH AS USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAPS OR EQUIVALENT. WHERE SURFACE WATERS RECEIVING RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT FIT ON THE PLAN SHEET, THEY MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH AN ARROW, INDICATING BOTH DIRECTION AND DISTANCE TO THE SURFACE WATER. • METHODS TO BE USED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA 4. WERE STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL REVIEW OF THE PROJECT? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE HOW THESE MEASURES WERE ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP. (III.A.6) N/A 5. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED IN A KARST AREA SUCH THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES WOULD BE NECESSARY OT PROJECT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN MINN. R. CHAPTERS 7050 AND 7060? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE THE ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO BE USED. (III.A.7) N/A 6. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A CALCEREOUS FEN LISTED IN MINN. R. 7050.0180, SUBP. 6 B? YES OR NO IF YES, A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO APPLICATION FOR THIS PERMIT. (PART I B.6 AND PART III.A.8) 7. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A WATER THAT IS LISTED AS IMPAIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS, TURBIDITY, DISSOLVED OXYGEN OR BIOTIC IMPAIRMENT? USE THE SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT: WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER/STORMWATER-C.HTML N/A IF NO, SKIP TO TRAINING DOES THE IMPAIRED WATER HAVE AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDL) WITH AN APPROVED WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY? NO IF YES: A. LIST THE RECEIVING WATER, THE AREAS OF THE SITE DISCHARGING TO IT, AND THE POLLUTANT(S) IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL. B. LIST THE BMP'S AND ANY OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL. IF THE SITE HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE IMPAIRED WATER AND THE WATER FLOWS TO THE IMPAIRED WATER BUT NO SPECIFIC BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL, THE ADDITIONAL BMPS IN APPENDIX A (C.1, C.2, C.3 & (CA -TROUT STREAM)) MUST BE ADDED TO THE SWPPP AND IMPLEMENTED. (III.A.7). THE ADDITIONAL BMPS ONLY APPLY TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT THAT DRAIN TO ONE OF THE IDENTIFIED DISCHARGE POINTS. N/A 8. IDENTIFY ADJACENT PUBLIC WATERS WHERE THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) HAS DECLARED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMES N/A SELECTION OF A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (III.D.) 1. WILL THE PROJECT CREATE A NEW CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE ACRE? YES OR NO IF YES, A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF ONE INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE CUMULATIVE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE (SEE PART III.D OF THE PERMIT) THROUGH INFILTRATION UNLESS PROHIBITED DUE TO ONE OF THE REASONS IN PART III.D.1.J. IF INFILTRATION IS PROHIBITED IDENTIFY OTHER METHOD OF OTHER VOLUME REDUCTION (E.G., FILTRATION SYSTEM, WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN, REGIONAL PONDING OR EQUIVALENT METHOD 2. DESCRIBE WHICH METHOD WILL BE USED TO TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT (III.D): • WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN • INFILTRATION/FILTRATION • REGIONAL PONDS • COMBINATION OF PRACTICES INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE METHOD SELECTED. SEE PART III.D OF THE PERMIT FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH METHOD. INFILTRATION / FILTRATION / REGIONAL PONDING CALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN THE SITE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT AND PART OF THIS SWPPP AS ATTACHMENT D. 3. IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENT FOR THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME, DESCRIBE WHY. THIS CAN INCLUDE PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT, SUCH AS GRASSES SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS, WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO TREAT RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. (III.C) IT IS FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME. 4. FOR PROJECTS THAT DISCHARGE TO TROUT STREAMS, INCLUDING TRIBUTARIES TO TROUT STREAMS, IDENTIFY METHOD OF INCORPORATING TEMPERATURE CONTROLS INTO THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. N/A EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES (IV.B) DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION BMP'S EXPECTED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCITON: 1. DESCRIBE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) BEFORE WORK BEGINS. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT ATHE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE. 2. DESCRIBE METHODS OF TEMPORARILY STABILIZING SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES (E.G., MULCHES, HYDRAULIC TACKIFIERS, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.): TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES. 3. DESCRIBE METHODS OF DISSIPATING VELOCITY ALONG STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND AT CHANNEL OUTLETS E.G. CHECK DAMS SEDIMENT TRAPS RIP RAP ETC.): SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL. 4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS (NOTE THAT MULCH, HYDRAULIC SOIL TACKIFIERS, HYDROMULCHES, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SOIL STABILIZATION METHODS FOR ANY PART OF A DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE) FINAL STABILIZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD 5. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS (E.G., RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, ETC.) RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS 6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO PROMOTE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL ON THE SITE PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE (E.G., DIRECT STORMWATER FLOW TO VEGETATED AREAS): DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILIZED 7. FOR DRAINAGE OR DIVERSION DITCHES, DESCRIBE PRACTICES TO STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE OR POINT OF DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATER. THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO SURFACE WATERS AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED FOR ALL DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL, IMPAIRED OR "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS". ALL OTHER REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER, PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. N/A, NO DITCHES ON SITE 8. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION (E.G., CONSTRUCTION PHASING, MINIMIZING SOIL DISTURBANCE, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, SLOPE DRAINING/TERRACING, ETC.): OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZING SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE. 9. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN APPENDIX A PART C.3 REGARDING MAINTAINING A 100-FOOT BUFFER ZONE OR INSTALLING REDUNDANT BMPS FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO SPECIAL WATERS). N/A 10. IF APPLICABLE, DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE TO PROTECT PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO INFILTRATION AREAS. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICIES (IV.C) DESCRIBE THE METHODS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT IMPACTS TO SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS 1. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL: SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE 2. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SOIL STOCKPILES: SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY 3. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION: SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS 4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VEHICLE TRACKING AT CONSTRUCTION EXITS AND STREET SWEEPING ACTIVITIES: THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 5. DESCRIBE METHODS, IF APPLICABLE, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHEN EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA: SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING TO PROTECT INFILTRATION AREAS. 6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOP SOIL (UNLESS INFEASIBLE) AT THIS SITE: LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED 7. DESCRIBE PLANS TO PRESERVE A 50-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROJECT'S SOIL DISTURBANCE AND A SURFACE WATER OR PLANS FOR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE: DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. PROJECT WILL NOT DISTURB WITHIN 200 FEET OF WETLAND. 8. DESCRIBE PLANS FOR USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) SEE PART IV.C.10 OF THE PERMIT: N/A 9. IS THE PROJECT REQUIRED TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DUE TO 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION OR 5 ACRES OR MORE IF THE SITE IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE (OR ATTACH PLANS) SHOWING HOW THE BASIN WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.0 OF THE PERMIT. N/A DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (IV.D) 1. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE MEASURES TO BE USED TO TREAT/DISPOSE OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER AND METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION OR SCOUR OF DISCHARGE POINTS (SEE PART IV. D OF THE PERMIT): N/A 2. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE USE OF FILTERS FOR BACKWASH WATER? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE HOW FILTER BACKWASH WATER WILL BE MANAGED ON THE SITE OR PROPERLY DISPOSED (SEE PART III.D.3. OF THE PERMIT): N/A ADDITIONAL BMP'S FOR SPECIAL WATERS AND DISCHARGES TO WETLANDS (APPENDIX A, PARTS C AND D) 1. SPECIAL WATERS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE TO SPECIAL WATERS? NO 2. IF PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, THEN OTHER TREATMENT SUCH AS GRASSED SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED. N/A 3. DESCRIBE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE TO A SPECIAL WATERS, AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS FOR AREAS THAT DRAIN FIVE OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. N/A 4. DESCRIBE THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER ZONE TO BE USED (NOT LESS THAN 100 LINEAR FEET FROM THE SPECIAL WATER). N/A 5. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL ENSURE THAT THE PRE AND POST PROJECT RUNOFF RATE AND VOLUME FROM THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS REMAINS THE SAME. N/A 6. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN THE TEMPERATURE OF TROUT STREAM RECEIVING WATERS RESULTING IN THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS. N/A 7. WETLANDS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE STORMWATER WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO A WETLAND (E.G., CONVERSION OF A NATURAL WETLAND TO A STORMWATER POND)? YES OR NO IF YES, DESCRIBE THE WETLAND MITIGATION SEQUENCE THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART D OF APPENDIX A. N/A INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (IV.E) DESCRIBE PROCEDURES TO ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE: • ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND • WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND WITHIN (7) DAYS AFTER THAT INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS. INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST" 1. Describe practices for storage of building products with a potential to leach pollutants to minimize exposure to stormwater: ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE 2. Describe practices for storage of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemical, and landscape materials: ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZED EXPOSURE 3. Describe practices for storage and disposal of hazardous materials or toxic waste (e.g., oil, fuel, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum -based products, wood preservative, additives, curing compounds, and acids) according to Minn. R. ch. 7045, including restricted access and secondary containment: ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 4. Describe collection, storage and disposal of solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035: ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTER WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS 5. Describe management of portable toilets to prevent tipping and disposal of sanitary wastes in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7040: SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER. 6. Describe spill prevention and response for fueling and equipment or vehicle maintenance: EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS. 7. Describe containment and disposal of vehicle and equipment wash water and prohibiting engine degreasing on the site: ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE 8. Describe storage and disposal of concrete and other washout wastes so that wastes do not contact the ground: ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE. FINAL STABILIZATION (IV.G) 1. DESCRIBE METHOD OF FINAL STABILIZATION (PERMANENT COVER) OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS: FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. 2. DESCRIBE PROCEDURES FOR COMPLETING FINAL STABILIZATION AND TERMINATING PERMIT COVERAGE (SEE PART IV.G.1-5): UPON STABILIZATION DESCRIBED ABOVE, THE CONTRCTOR AND OWNER SHALL MUTUALLY TRANSFER THE NPDES PERMIT TO THE NEXT OWNER WITH DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING THE NATURE OF TERMINATION PROCEDURE. DOCUMENTATION OF INFEASIBILITY: (IF APPLICABLE) 0 0 0 c7 a o U FP Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 IrkFIRM GROUND _11-- _ _ - 'yhneers Lu O d N CO CM LO L[) O J W I= O m O O U W N O M L0 LO 00 1Z LU W mz J W Y Q W LU J O O O T_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY WPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1 04 11/8/2021 1:40:06 PM COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORM NOTE: THIS INSPECTION REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL APOLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED ON AUGUST 1, 2013. THE COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE; IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE(S) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. FACILITY INFORMATION SITE NAME: FACILITY ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: INSPECTION INFORMATION ATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM ATTACHMENT C - ABOVE -GROUND FACILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE INSPECTOR NAME: PHONE NUMBER: 2 DATE (MM/DD/YYYY): TIME: AM / PM IS THE INSPECTOR CERTIFIED IN SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND IS IT DOCUMENTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)? IS THIS INSPECTION ROUTINE OR IN RESPONSE TO A STORM EVENT: RAINFALL AMOUNT (IF APPLICABLE): IS THE SITE WITHIN ONE AERIAL MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER? IF YES, FOLLOW APPENDIX A AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS NOTE: IF N/A IS SELECTED AT ANY TIME, SPECIFY WHY IN THE COMMENT AREA FOR THAT SECTION. 3 EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.B) Y N N/A 1. SOIL STABILIZATION WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR 14 DAYS? (7 DAYS WHERE APPLICABLE) ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. HAS THE NEED TO DISTURB STEEP SLOPES BEEN MINIMIZED? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. ALL DITCHES STABILIZED 200; BACK FROM POINT OF DISCHARGE WITHIN 24 HOURS? (NOT MULCH) ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. ARE THERE BMP'S FOR ONSITE STOCKPILES? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. ARE APPROPRIATE BMP'S INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS/OUTLETS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. DO PIPE OUTLETS HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION? ❑ ❑ ❑ COMMENTS: SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.C) Y N N/A 1. PERIMETER CONTROL INSTALLED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. PERIMETER CONTROL TRENCHED IN WHERE APPROPRIATE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER MAINTAINED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3.1. IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. INLET PROTECTION ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND CULVERT INLETS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. VEHICLE TRACKING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AT ALL SITE EXITS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS STAKED AND MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. ARE ALL INFILTRATION AREAS PROTECTED WITH A PRETREATMENT DEVICE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. DO ALL STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROLS? ❑ ❑ ❑ COMMENTS: MAINTENANCE -EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (PART IV.E.) Y N N/A 1. ARE ALL PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED AREAS MAINTAINING 90% GROUND COVER? ❑ ❑ ❑ EROSIONOBSERP El ❑ ❑ 3. PERIMETER -- El ❑ ❑ 4. ARE INEET PROTECTION DEVICES MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY? COMMENTS: ALL STORMWATER RETENTION, DETENTION AND TREATMENT BASINS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO DETERMINE THAT BASIN RETENTION AND TREATMENT CHARACTERISTICS ARE ADEQUATE. A STORAGE TREATMENT BASIN WILL BE CONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENT HAS DECREASED THE WET STORAGE VOLUME BY 50 PERCENT OR DRY STORAGE VOLUME BY 25 PERCENT OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN VOLUME. BASED ON THIS INSPECTION, IF A STORMWATER BASIN REQUIRES SEDIMENT CLEANOUT, THE BASIN WILL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN CONTOURS AND VEGETATED STATE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE INSPECTION DATE. ALL OUTLET STRUCTURES, CULVERTS, OUTFALL STRUCTURES AND OTHER STORMWATER FACILITIES FOR WHICH MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN MUST BE INSPECTED IN THE SPRING, SUMMER AND FALL OF EACH YEAR. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE INSPECTION DATE, ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS MUST BE REMOVED SUCH THAT EACH STORMWATER FACILITY OPERATES AS DESIGNED AND PERMITTED. CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF LITTER AND VEGETATIVE DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS KEPT CLEAR, INLET AREAS KEPT CLEAN, AND UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION REMOVED. EROSION IMPAIRING THE FUNCTION OR INTEGRITY OF THE FACILITIES, IF ANY, WILL BE CORRECTED, AND ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF THE FACILITIES MUST BE REPAIRED. VOLUME CONTROL FACILITIES AND CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED EVERY THREE MONTHS DURING THE OPERATIONAL PERIOD (BETWEEN SPRING SNOWMELT AND FIRST SUBSTANTIAL SNOWFALL) AND MONITORED AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS OF 1 INCH OR MORE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS CLEAR OF LITTER AND DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE CLEAR, INLET AREAS ARE CLEAN, UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION IS REMOVED AND THERE IS NO EROSION IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF A FACILITY. IF SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED IN A INFILTRATION FEATURE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INSPECTION DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS MUST BE REMOVED, THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS MUST BE RESTORED, AND ANY SURFACE DISTURBANCE MUST BE STABILIZED. INSPECTION MUST ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT TRAPS AND FOREBAYS ARE TRAPPING SEDIMENT AND THAT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE STORAGE VOLUME REMAINS, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS STABLE (I.E., NO EROSION IS OBSERVED), AND INLETS AND OUTLET/OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS WITH NO EROSION. MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES USED MUST PROTECT THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE PRACTICE BY LIMITING SOIL COMPACTION TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE (E.G., BY USING LOW -IMPACT EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT). 0 0 0 U FP Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 IrkFIRM GROUND - _ _. _ - 'yhneers OTHER 1. ARE ALL MATERIALS THAT CAN LEACH POLLUTANTS UNDER COVER? Y N ❑ ❑ N/A ❑ w 2. HAS ACCESS BEEN RESTRICTED TO ONSITE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 3. DOES ON -SITE FUELING ONLY OCCUR IN A CONTAINED AREA? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0- ARE ALL SOLID WAS I ES BEING PROPERLY DISPOSED 01F' El El El 5. IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA COMPLETELYCOISITAINED? fi. IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA MARKED WITH SIGN? ❑ ❑ ❑ COMMENTS: Y N N/A 7. WERE ANY DISCHARGES SEEN DURING THIS INSPECTION, SEDIMENT, WATER, OR OTHERWISE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 7.1. IF YES, STATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE. PHOTOGRAPH THE DISCHARGE AND DESCRIBE THE DISCHARGE (COLOR, ODOR, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, ETC). HOW WILL IT BE REMOVED? HOW DID THE DISCHARGE HAPPEN? HOW MUCH WAS DISCHARGED? HOW WILL IT BE STOPPED, AND HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO STOP? IS THE DISCHARGE GOING INTO AN ADJACENT SITE? WAS THE DISCHARGE A SEDIMENT DELTA? IF YES, WILL THE DELTA BE RECOVERED WITHIN 7 DAYS? 8. WILL A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE UTILIZED IN THIS PROJECT AS REQUIRED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.D OF THE PERMIT? DESCRIBE: Y N N/A 9. IS ANY DEWATERING OCCURRING ON SITE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 9.1. IF YES, WHERE? WHAT BMP IS BEING USED? HOW MUCH WATER IS BEING DEWATERED? IS THE WATER CLEAR? WHERE IS THE WATER BEING DISCHARGED TO? Y N N/A 10. IS A COPY OF THE SWPPP LOCATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE? 11. HAS THE SWPPP BEEN FOLLOWED AND IMPLEMENTED ON SITE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. IS A SEDIMENTATION BASIN REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT? ❑ ❑ ❑ 12.1. IF YES, ARE THEY MAINTAINED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT? ❑ ❑ ❑ 13. IS THE TOPSOIL ON THIS PROJECT BEING PRESERVED? ❑ ❑ ❑ 13.1. IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE TOPSOIL IS BEING PRESERVED. IF NO, EXPLAIN WHY IT WAS INFEASIBLE. Y N N/A 14. ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION? ❑ ❑ ❑ 14.1. DO ALL INFILTRATION AREAS HAVE PRETREATMENT DEVICES? ❑ ❑ ❑ 15. DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION, REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDED DATE OF COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: 16. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP: 17. POTENTIAL AREAS OF FUTURE CONCERN: 18. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS DISCLOSURES: • AFTER DISCOVERY, THE PERMIT REQUIRES MANY OF THE DEFICIENCIES THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THIS CHECKLIST BE CORRECTED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME. SEE PERMIT FOR MORE DETAILS. • THIS INSPECTION CHECKLIST IS AN OPTION FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTION SITES. LARGE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND LINEAR PROJECTS REQUIRE MORE EXTENSIVE/MORE LOCATION SPECIFIC INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. • THE PERMITTEE(S) IS/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMP'S AS WELL AS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S UNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT ACCORDING TO PART II.B.5., OR THE PROJECT HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. U) FM z w FM 5 a a CO CM LO Ln O J LU I- Z O J 100 O U W V W W m J J W N O M LO Z O LU J U_ Z O Y Q W ry 120 LU J LU O O O T_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 11/8/21 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:JS REVIEWED BY: MP PROJECT NUMBER: 19332 REVISION SUMMARY WPPP - ATTACHMENTS ■ 11/8/2021 1:40:11 PM SW15 0 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP II\ 2 REFERENCE SECOND FLOOR 1 /16" = V-0" .E N 0 U J N 00 U E C Oaa U) lO FN ouq u4 6 c a v EN°o N o� 1 REFERENCE FIRST FLOOR 1/16" = 1'-0" Ilo E4�[0 l )� 7 PLAN 275 Market Street, Ste. 368 Minneapolis, MN 55405 612.819.1835 www.firmgroundae.com I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota Thomas P. Wasmoen M M/D D/YYYY 20891 Date License No. PARTNERS/CONSULTANTS OWNER TWIN PINES LLC 4300 School Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 PROJECT TWIN PINES APARTMENTS SCHOOL BLVD MONTICELLO, MN PROJECT NO. 19.055 DRAWN BY R. NICHOLS CHECKED BY T. WASMOEN © COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRMGROUNDAE INC. R LION ON # ISSUE/REVISION DATE City Submittal 111.08.2021 SHEET TITLE FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER C101 FIRM GROUND hitects & engineers FIRM G R O U N D 1,1111111111 1,1111111111 1,1111111111 ii 01 91111111•i l�IIIIIt! A 110 11 FIRM G R O U N D 111 011 111 MEN ipm! 11111111111 Iiiiii'liM 111111111,1111 illllll�lll' .�..r..._.. lip, ��illllll IIIII I�� ME n 1111-1101101 UP NO S��' ►!� ►� A l le 11 iE N 0 U J N 00 U E C Oaa Sao lO FN ouq u4 6 c a Iq« N o� oar 0 PARKING GARAGE 1 /16" = V-0" PARKING REQUIREMENTS: At 2.25 STALLS/UNIT- 207 REQUIRED NOTE: ONLY 1.1 STALLS/UNIT ARE ALLOWED TO BE UNCOVERED= 101 ALLOWED ON GRADE SEEKING FLEXIBILITY TO ALLOW FOR 1 STALL/BEDROOM: (42) 1 BEDROOMS + (42) 2 BEDROOMS + (4) 3 BEDROOMS (5) STUDIOS= 143 STALLS PROPOSED: 76 BELOW GRADE STALLS 80 ON GRADE STALLS 156 TOTAL STALLS 275 Market Street, Ste. 368 Minneapolis, MN 55405 612.819.1835 www.firmgroundae.com I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota Thomas P. Wasmoen M M/D D/YYYY 20891 Date License No. PARTNERS/CONSULTANTS OWNER TWIN PINES LLC 4300 School Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 PROJECT TWIN PINES APARTMENTS SCHOOL BLVD MONTICELLO, MN PROJECT NO. 19.055 DRAWN BY R. NICHOLS CHECKED BY T. WASMOEN © COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRMGROUNDAE INC. �j a ONE LION G # ISSUE/REVISION DATE City Submittal 11.08.2021 SHEET TITLE UNDERGROUND PARKING PLAN SHEET NUMBER N C 100 PLAN FIRM GROUND hitects & engineers CivilSite G R O U P Memorandum TO: Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello www.ci.monticello.mn.us 763-271-3224 FROM: Will Bruestle Civil Site Group DATE: November 17, 2021 RE: Twin Pines Apartments Below are the written comments regarding the Twin Pines Apartments project. We have included our response below each question in bold red. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Will Bruestle Civil Site Group wbruestle(@civilsitegroup.com 218-209-7942 www.CivilSiteGroul).com 4931 West 35"' Street • Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota • 55416 (612) 615-0060 Traffic Memo The applicant has provided an estimate of the average daily traffic and peak hour traffic\ generated from the entire site as developed. The existing access from School Boulevard will be utilized. It appears that the existing turn lane configurations on School Blvd have adequate capacity to accommodate the projected volumes from the proposed site. The City is reviewing intersection controls along the School Boulevard corridor to determine if and when any modifications are needed. Future special assessments may apply to the property for future improvements. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. Preliminary and Final Plat 2. Monticello Business Center 7th Addition already exists as the Aldi site, therefore the plat name will need to be renamed. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. 3. The proposed site is currently platted as Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 6th Addition plat, which includes a blanket drainage and utility easement over the Outlot. The easements will need to be vacated with required easements for the utilities dedicated on the final plat. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. EASEMENTS REFLECT VACATION AND DEDICATION. 4. The drainage and utility easements shown on the plat needs to be revised to remove the easement where the courtyard is located, as that area is no longer being used as an infiltration basin. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. EASEMENTS UPDATED TO NO LONGER INCLUDE COUTYYARD AREA. 5. The applicant shall enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement with the City to maintain the infiltration basin and storm sewer system and drainage and utility easements do not need to be platted for these areas. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. Preliminary Civil Plans Site Plan 6. The applicant should consider creating a separate drive aisle to the proposed apartment building in lieu of accessing the building through the existing parking lots. See planning report. CSG RESPONSE: SEPARATE DRIVE AISLE NOT FEASABLE. SITE UPDATED TO CREATE MORE PEDESTRIAN ACCESSABLE ROUTES. 7. A sidewalk should extend from the proposed apartment building to the existing pathway along School Blvd. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. SITE PLAN UPDATED TO INCLUDE CONNECTING PATH FROM EXISTING APARTMENT TO SIDEWALK ALONG SCHOOL BLVD. 8. Show handicap parking stalls compliant with ADA regulations. 4931 West 361 Street • Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota •55416 • www.civilsitegroup.com Matt Pavek, PE • 763-213-3944 Patrick Sarver, PLA • 952-250-2003 CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. SITE AND GRADING PLAN UPDATED TO INCLUDE ADA PARKING STALLS COMPLIENT WITH ADA GRADING REQUIREMENTS. 9. The civil and architectural site plans should be consistent. The elevations and grades are not the same between the plans. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. Utility Plan 10. The watermain should be looped within site as identified in the original preliminary plat or the applicant shall provide documentation that there is adequate pressure and fire flow to serve the site. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. UTILITY PLAN UPDATED TO SHOW LOOPED WATERMAIN 11. A wet -tap connection to the existing watermain does not appear to be needed for the watermain extension. The existing hydrant is being removed, therefore a gate valve should be installed and the watermain extended. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. UTILITY PLAN UPDATED TO SHOW REMOVAL OF EXISTING HYDRANT AND INSTALLATION OF GATE VALVE AT CONNECTION POINTS TO EXISITNG WATERMAIN(S). 12. Label the connections needed, gate valve and watermain service size and length of water service. CSG RESPONSE: CONNECTIONS AND GATE VALVLES FOR THE PROPOSED "LOOPED" WATERMAIN TO MATCH EXISTING WATERMAIN SIZE. PROPOSED BUILDING SERVICE TO BE SIZED MY MECHANICAL. 13. Identify proposed fire hydrant locations. The plans identify that existing hydrants will be salvaged and reinstalled, but do not show the new hydrant locations. CSG RESPONSE: UTILITY PLAN UPDATED SHOWING PROPOSED LOCATION FOR HYDRANT TO BE REINSTALLED. 14. The building department will then review the proposed fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. A turning radius template drawing for the ladder truck shall be provided. CSG RESPONSE: SHEET C2.0 UPDATED TO INCLUDE VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT 15. Identify irrigation stub locations and submit an irrigation plan to the building department with the building permit. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. RESPONSIBILITY OF ARCH/CONTRACTOR. 16. Confirm that the 8-inch sanitary sewer size is adequate per Ten State Standards. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. FINAL SIZE TO BE DESIGNED BY MECHANICAL. 17. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction CSG RESPONSE: CITY NOTE ADDED TO SHEET C4.0 4931 West 351 Street • Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota •55416 • www.civilsitegroup.com Matt Pavek, PE • 763-213-3944 Patrick Sarver, PLA • 952-250-2003 Grading Plan 18. Label the % grade for the parking lot. CSG RESPONSE: GRADING PLAN UPDATED TO INCLUDE % GRADE IN PARKING LOT. 19. Show the rim and invert elevations of the storm sewer. CSG RESPONSE: STORM RIM AND INVERT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET C3.0 20. Riprap shall be grouted per City general specifications. CSG RESPONSE: NOTE ADDED TO SHEET C4.0 21. Verify that the 959.50 EOF elevation is accurate as the surrounding contour elevations appear higher to be higher. Landscaping will need to be modified/removed to not block the EOF route. CSG RESPONSE: EOF UPDATED. PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE OVER EXISTING STORM PIPE RUNNING FROM SITE SOUTH TO REGIONAL POND 22. Provide trench drain design and information on the storm sewer pumping system. The pumping system will need to comply with the Building Code. CSG RESPONSE: TRENCH DRAIN ELIMINATED. GRADING UPDATED. 23. Confirm all roof drainage is being directed to the infiltration basin. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. RESPONSIBILITY OF ARCH. 24. Provide documentation that retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height are certified by a professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired. A fence or railing is required along the top of the wall. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. RESPONSIBILITY OR ARCH/STRUCTURAL 25. The City's Wellhead Protection Plan identifies this site within the "low vulnerability" DWSMA, but it is outside of the Emergency Response Area (ERA), therefore infiltration is allowed. Residential uses typically do not pose a risk of potential contaminants and will be reviewed at the time of proposed development submittal. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. 26. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. 27. Verify landscaping on the west side of building will not block the drainage Swale. CSG RESPONSE: DRAINAGE SWALE NO LONGER PROPOSED. Stormwater Management Plan 28. Provide modeling calculations for the 10-day snowmelt (7.2") event. CSG RESPONSE: 10-DAY SNOWMELT EVENT ADDED TO HYDROCAD CALCULATIONS AND STORMWATER REPORT. 29. Provide soil borings to confirm soil type, infiltration rates, and groundwater elevation. Confirm that there is a 3-foot separation between the bottom of the infiltration areas and the groundwater elevation. CSG RESPONSE: RESPONSIBILITY OF OWNER/DEVELOPER. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL. 4931 West 351 Street - Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota •55416 - www.civilsitegroup.com Matt Pavek, PE - 763-213-3944 Patrick Sarver, PLA • 952-250-2003 30. Pretreatment for runoff to infiltration basin is required. A 4-foot sump manhole is required at the last structure (CBMH 22) before entering the infiltration basin. CSG RESPONSE: UTILITY PLAN UPDATED TO INCLUDE SUMP AT CBMH 22. 31. According to the City's design guidelines, the maximum size slope for the infiltration basin should be 4:1, see Detail 4 on page C5.1. CSG RESPONSE: PLANS SHOW PROPOSED SLOPES FOR INFILTRATION AT 3:1. 32. Provide a detail for outlet control structure for pond. CSG RESPONSE: STORM MANHOLE DETAIL ADDED TO SHEET C5.1 33. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design for the 10- year storm event including the trench drain design. CSG RESPONSE: CURRENTLY BEING WORKED ON. WILL BE INCLUDED IN FINAL STAGE PUD. Water Quality and Volume Reduction 34. Applicant is required to infiltrate 1.1" over the net new impervious area. Required Infiltration Amount 10,665 cf Proposed Infiltration Amount 11,687 cf CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. HYDROCAD CALCULATIONS REFLECT REDESIGN. 35. The infiltration ponding depth proposed is from elevation 956.5 to 958.3 or 1.8 ft. An infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr has been assumed in the HydroCAD model. In a 48 hr period, the amount of drawdown equates to 1.8-feet given the infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr. As shown, the basins will drawdown within a 48-hour period. Geotechnical borings need to be submitted to confirm soil type, infiltration rates, and groundwater elevation. Confirm that there is a 3-foot separation between the bottom of the infiltration areas and the groundwater elevation. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. Rate Control 36. The site will utilize the regional basin for rate control. The regional basin assumed that this site would have a curve number of 72, the actual curve number for this development is 83. Therefore, the site has provided rate control for the difference between curve number 72 and 83. The difference was determined by the applicant as a 100-yr rate of 4,413 cf/acre. Applying this to the entire site identifies that 19,409 cf of storage is required for rate control on this site. This storage volume is met in the infiltration basin. The rate control requirement has been met with the proposed pond and the regional pond. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED. Freeboard 37. Given the low opening for the garage is a 960.33 the EOF should be identified as 1.5' below that elevation at 958.83. CSG RESPONSE: PROPOSED EOF IS 2 FEET BELOW LOW OPENING 38. The FFE of 971.00 is more than the required 2 feet above the HWL of 959.78, however the underground parking area has an opening elevation of 960.33 which does not meet freeboard requirements of 2-feet above the HWL. Consider installing a berm to mitigate this. If this cannot be mitigated, the development agreement will include language indemnifying the City from any damages arising from the design and construction of the site and structure and that the property 4931 West 35t° Street • Suite 200 St. Louis Park • Minnesota •55416 • www.civilsitegroup.com Matt Pavek, PE • 763-213-3944 Patrick Sarver, PLA • 952-250-2003 owner shall be responsible for any and all flooding and associated property damage to the structure, appurtenances and tenants' property for not meeting the freeboard requirement. CSG RESPONSE: PROPOSED ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LOW FLOOR ELEVATION AND HWL IS 2.63 FEET. 4931 West 351 Street • Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota •55416 • www.civilsitegroup.com Matt Pavek, PE • 763-213-3944 Patrick Sarver, PLA • 952-250-2003 2 0 U 0 z W m 0 00 M a LO LO W J 0 EL a w z z 0 0 M W H Z) w Z) z w Q Q z W x 0 wsb December 2, 2021 Matt Leonard City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Kjellberg Twin Pines Apartments Development Stage PUD, Preliminary and Final Plat Plan Review City Project No. 2019-027 WSB Project No. R-014468-000 Dear Mr. Leonard: We have reviewed the Kjellberg Twin Pines Preliminary Plat submittal dated November 8, 2021, that included preliminary civil site/grading plans and stormwater management plan as prepared by Civil Site Group. The engineering plans and documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Monticello's general engineering and stormwater treatment standards. We offer the following comments regarding these matters. ('Pnpral 1. Add a note to the plans referencing the City Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Preliminary and Final Plat 2. Monticello Business Center 7th Addition already exists as the Aldi site; therefore, the plat name will need to be renamed Complete. 3. The proposed site is currently platted as Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 61h Addition plat, which includes a blanket drainage and utility easement over the Outlot. The easements will need to be vacated with required easements for the utilities dedicated on the final plat. Applicant noted receipt of these comments in their response dated January 22, 2020 and stated "easements reflect vacation and dedication." 4. The drainage and utility easements shown on the plat needs to be revised to remove the easement where the courtyard is located, as that area is no longer being used as an infiltration basin. It appears this has been done, but the easements should also be added to the Utility Plan. 5. The applicant shall enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement with the City to maintain the infiltration basin and storm sewer system and drainage and utility easements do not need to be platted for these areas. Applicant noted receipt of these comments in their response dated January 22, 2020. 6. A minimum of a 12' drainage and utility easement should be added around the perimeter of the lot. K:\014468-000\Admin\Docs\2021-11-16 Submittal\_2021-12-02 Twin Pines Apts Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx Kjellberg Twin Pines Apartments — WSB Engineering Review December 2, 2021 Page 2 7. Provide confirmation that the easement on the adjacent property to the south allows for grading of the EOF. Also, provide notification to the adjacent property owner of any work occurring within the prescribed easement. Existing Site & Removal Plan (C1.0) 8. The plan notes to remove and salvage the existing hydrants. It is not clear whether the salvaged hydrants will be used onsite. The City's preference is that new hydrants are used with the proposed improvements. Site & Paving Plan (C2.0) 9. The applicant should consider creating a separate drive aisle to the proposed apartment building in lieu of accessing the building through the existing parking lots. See planning report Applicant noted that a separate drive aisle is not feasible, but the site was updated to create more pedestrian accessible routes. 10. A sidewalk should extend from the proposed apartment building to the existing pathway along School Blvd. Applicant noted the site plan was updated to include a connecting path from the existing apartment to sidewalk along School Boulevard. 11. Update parking lot to show the correct number of Handicap parking stalls in compliance with ADA regulations. 12. Note the location of pedestrian curb ramps and add the appropriate details onto the details sheets. 13. Add the notation for the signs on the plan view to correspond with what is noted in the legend. 14. If tip -out curb is proposed, note these locations on the plans. 15. Coordinate civil and architectural plans to match, currently grades are different. 16. Add an item in the legend for the specialty pavement and a typical section on the details page. Add a detail for the edging as well, if applicable. 17. It is not clear where the heavy-duty pavement is located (item in legend). Add the hatching to the plan per the geotechnical evaluation and a typical section on the details sheet. Grading Plan (C3.0) 18. The City's Wellhead Protection Plan identifies this site within the "low vulnerability" DWSMA, but it is outside of the Emergency Response Area (ERA), therefore infiltration is allowed. Residential uses typically do not pose a risk of potential contaminants and will be reviewed at the time of proposed development submittal. 19. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. Kjellberg Twin Pines Apartments — WSB Engineering Review December 2, 2021 Page 3 20. Label the % grade for the parking lot. The percent grades within the handicapped parking and access isle area cannot exceed 2.0%, note on plans accordingly and confirm the grading in and areas meet this requirement. Similarly, the cross slope on pedestrian routes cannot exceed 2.0%, note the cross slope on the plans. Note the percent grade of the parking entrance driveway and in the rear patio area. Complete. 21. Riprap shall be grouted per City general specifications. Note the quantity proposed at each location. Complete. 22. The EOF for the pond is called out as 958.33, please provide information on grading off the site to the south as this limit is cut off on the grading plan. Complete. 23. Provide trench drain design and information on the storm g system. The pumping system will need to comply with the Building Cc( Complete. 24. Confirm all roof drainage is being directed to the infiltration basir, Complete. 25. Provide documentation that retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height are certified by a professional engineer and a buildinn narmit has been acquired. A fence or railing is required along the top of the wall Complete. 26. Verify landscaping on west side of building will not block drainage swale 27. Retaining walls over 4' in height will require a fence or railing, provide standard details. 28. The grading in and around the handicapped spaces cannot exceed 2.0% in grade, show additional grade percentages and/or provide note(s) to this affect. Utility Plan (C4.0) 29. The watermain should be looped within site as identified in the original preliminary plat or the applicant shall provide documentation that there is adequate pressure and fire flow to serve the sit(- Complete. 30. The building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation and will provide comments separately from this letter. The fire hydrant spacing will need to meet current building code. 31. Identify irrigation stub locations and submit an irrigation plan to the building department with the building permit. Show the proposed stub location on the Utility and Landscape Plans. 32. Show the drainage and utility easements on the Utility Plan 33. Label the size and type of the proposed watermain loop. Note the sizes of the valves on the plan and class of pipe proposed. 34. Note the location of the post indicator valve (PIV). 35. A wet -tap connection to the existing watermain does not appear to be needed for the watermain extension. The existing hydrant is being removed; therefore, a gate valve should be installed and the watermain extended. Complete. Kjellberg Twin Pines Apartments — WSB Engineering Review December 2, 2021 Page 4 36. Identify fire hydrant locations, currently plan states exis'' rainctallarl hi it nlan rinac not chrnni tha naXni Innatinnc Complete, but the City's preference is that new hydrants are used for the proposed developments. 37. Where sanitary or storm sewer crosses the watermain, note "Maintain 18-Inch Separation, 4" Rigid Insulation" at each location. 38. The sewer service and storm sewer pipe crossing appear to be in conflict. Review all conflict points and adjust grades as necessary. 39. The proposed sanitary sewer line is at a slight skew to the existing main alignment. If possible, this proposed like should have the same alignment as the existing, otherwise a manhole may be required at the connection point. 40. The existing sanitary manhole on the easterly entrance appears to be located where the new curb is proposed. Consider moving the curb to avoid conflict with the manhole casting. 41. Confirm that the 8-inch sanitary sewer size is adequate per Ten State Standards. 42. Note the pipe material types and strength designation for sanitary sewer pipes (i.e. PVC SDR 35). 43. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of: a. The City of Monticello shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be done in accordance with the City of Monticello standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5'. e. The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warrant for the utility system provide report and video files to the City for review. Civil Details Plans (C5.0, C5.1) 44. Use the City standard details for the proposed utility work including sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, or other items to the greatest extent practicable. 45. Provide a detail for the proposed retaining walls and safety fence. SWPPP (SW1.0 - SW1.5) 46. Either add a note or clarify the legend that the perimeter control shall be comprised of silt fence. 47. Show the location of the stabilized construction entrance. Kjellberg Twin Pines Apartments — WSB Engineering Review December 2, 2021 Page 5 48. Add BMP such as silt fence or bio-roll at the bottom perimeter of the infiltration basin. 49. Show the hatching on the plan view for the erosion control blanket locations. 50. A full review of erosion/sediment control will be conducted with the final plat submittal. Show hatching on plan where this will be required. Traffic & Access 51. The applicant has provided an estimate of the average daily traffic and peak hour traffic generated from the entire site as developed. The existing access from School Boulevard will be utilized. It appears that the existing turn lane configurations on School Blvd have adequate capacity to accommodate the projected volumes from the proposed site. The City is reviewing intersection controls along the School Boulevard corridor to determine if and when any modifications are needed. Future special assessments may apply to the Applicant noted receipt of these comments from their response dated January 22, 2020. Stormwater Management Plan ?. Provide modeling calculations for the 10-day snowmelt (7.2") event. CN's should br, modified in this model event to PR to simulate no infiltration/frozen conditions. 53. Provide soil borings to confirm soil type, infiltration rates, and groundwater elevation. Confirm that there is a 3-foot separation between the bottom of the infiltration areas and the groundwater elevation. 54. , retreatment for runoff to infiltration basin ._ ._ _.. UU. I IUVIUU __ 111U1 IL UUVIUU c curb cut before entering the infiltration basin. 55. According to the City's design guidelines, the maximum side slope for the infiltration basin should be 4:1, see Detail 4 on page C5.1. The current plan shows slopes at a 3: -hich is steeper than allow" 56. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design for the 10-year storm event including the trench drain design. Water Quality and Volume Reduction: 58. The infiltration ponding depth proposed is from elevation 954.33 to 956.13 or 1.8 ft. An infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr has been assumed in the HydroCAD model. In a 48 hr period, the amount of drawdown equates to 1.8-feet given the infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr. As shown, the basins will drawdown within a 48-hour period. Geotechnical borings need to be submitted to confirm soil type, infiltration rates, and groundwater elevation. Confirm that there is a 3-foot separation between the bottom of the infiltration areas and the groundwater elevation. Kjellberg Twin Pines Apartments — WSB Engineering Review December 2, 2021 Page 6 Rate Control: 59. The site will utilize the regional basin for rate control. The regional basin assumed that this site would have a curve number of 72, the actual curve number for this development is 83. Therefore, the site has provided rate control for the difference between curve number 72 and 83. The difference was determined by the applicant as a 100-yr rate of 4,413 cf/acre. Applying this to the entire site identifies that 19,409 cf of storage is required for rate control on this site. This storage volume is met in the infiltration basin. The rate control requirement has been met with the proposed pond and the regional pond. The site utilizing the regional pond for overall rate control, therefore alternate ponding fees for the site are applicable. Freeboard: 60. The EOF of 958.33 provides the required freeboard of at least 1.5ft to the building low opening of 960.33. 61. The FFE of 971.00 and low opening elevation of 960.33 are more than the required 2 feet above the HWL of 957.70. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Feel free to contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions or comments regarding the engineering review. Sincerely, WSB ;�L� James L. Stremel, P.E. Senior Project Manager Planning Commission Agenda: 12/07/21 3A. Consideration of Adopting Resolution PC-2021-050, a Resolution Finding that the Proposed Acquisition of Certain Land by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authoritv is Consistent with the Citv of Monticello Comarehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan) Prepared by: Community Development Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Director 12/07/2021 Commission action): NA Additional Analysis by: City Administrator, Economic Development Manager, Community & Economic Development Coordinator ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt Resolution PC-2021-050 finding that the proposed acquisition of certain land by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority is consistent with the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan). 2. Motion of other. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Planning Commission is asked to consider a recommendation finding that the acquisition of 113 West Broadway by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority is in conformance to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The acquisition includes a commercial building/property on a single parcel. It is being acquired for the direct purposes of supporting redevelopment on Block 52 as envisioned by the Downtown Small Area Plan. The property is located in the center portion of the block fronting Broadway and TH 25. A map illustrating current City/EDA ownership of parcels on Block 52 is attached for reference. The parcel is guided "Downtown Mixed Use" within the current Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The Comprehensive Plan adopts the Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan as the guiding document for downtown development and land use. The Downtown Small Area Plan specifically recommends leveraging the public property on this block to "create a new signature development with market rate housing and a destination restaurant or entertainment use overlooking the park and river." The plan views the area as key to the success of downtown revitalization, suggesting as an immediate Next Step and Implementation measure to "Aggressively market development opportunities such as Block 52." Planning Commission Agenda: 12/07/21 The acquisition site is currently zoned CCD, Central Community District, which is the City's downtown zoning district. There are zoning standards in place specific to the downtown which will be applicable to this project. The EDA plans to work with a developer and the City (which owns the Walnut Street public parking lot) to develop a project which maximizes the community's connection to the Mississippi River, ideally a mixed -use project including both residential and commercial components. The EDA considered entering into a purchase agreement on the subject property at its regular November meeting, which is contingent on the Planning Commission's finding. The Commission's role is to provide a report to the EDA on the conformance of the acquisition to the adopted Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City staff supports Alternative #1 above. Acquisition of this property by the EDA is a key step in moving forward with redevelopment on Block 52 as outlined within the Downtown Small Area Plan and Comprehensive Plan. Acquisition of the parcel by the EDA is in clear support of the Downtown Small Area Plan's goals for revitalization on the block, as the property connects the downtown directly to the river and future redevelopment on the site supports the plan's four main goals: 1. Become a River Town 2. Improve the Pine Street experience for all 3. Focus on small and medium investments 4. Shift the center of downtown to Broadway and Walnut SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2021-050 B. Aerial Image C. City/EDA Property Ownership Map D. Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan and Downtown Small Area Plan, Excerpts 2 MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-050 A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LAND FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") proposes to purchase certain property (the "Property") located at 113 West Broadway Street in the City of Monticello (the "City"), for the purposes of eventual redevelopment; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.356, subd. 2, requires the City Planning Commission (the "Planning Commission") to review the proposed acquisition or disposal of publicly -owned real property within the City prior to its acquisition or disposal, to determine whether in the opinion of the Planning Commission, such acquisition or disposal is consistent with the City's comprehensive municipal plan (the "Comprehensive Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed acquisition of the Property and has determined that the Property is located in the downtown area of the City, is zoned Central Community District, and is designated for mixed commercial and multifamily residential uses within the Comprehensive Plan and the City's downtown small area plan, and that the Authority's purpose is to redevelop the Property consistent with these uses, and that the proposed acquisition is therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, that the acquisition of the Property by the Authority is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will promote the redevelopment of a portion of the downtown area of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be communicated to the Board of Commissioners of the Authority. Adopted this 1st day of November, 2021, by the Monticello Planning Commission. Chair, Monticello Planning Commission 518049v1 MNI NIN325-38 107 '�x• 218' 709 rl N 44 CIV I r4` o� i A / v t CV 14 B. a , Y 1 Lo AN. ;.. y City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan IVIUI ILII.CIIV, MN Prepared for: The City of Monticello ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 Prepared by: Cuningham Group Architecture, Inc. Tangible Consulting Services CLININGHAM Moriilao 6 e o V P Background and Purpose The purpose of this Plan is to attract and direct investments on the core blocks of Downtown Monticello, MN over the next 10 years. The Plan advocates for solidifying Downtown as the heart of the community with a series of coordinated public and private investments. Together, these investments will create a human -scaled environment that encourages gathering, socializing, visiting and enjoying on a daily basis - throughout the year. The improvements outlined in this Plan aim to build on the unique qualities of Monticello to make the Downtown yet more attractive to those who have chosen to live and do business in the community. Specifically, the Plan seeks to promote Broadway Street as a storefront district with restaurants and specialty retail, celebrate the River for its recreational, connective and economic qualities, reinvigorate a downtown housing market with multiple, appropriately scaled, infill projects, and improve the experience of Pine Street for all users. The plan is ambitious, but achievable. Over time and upon completion, the plan would usher in up to 500 new units of downtown housing, new restaurants overlooking the river, and unique retail and services on Broadway. Momentum can be established in the next few years. Primary projects to be completed within five years include: redevelopment of Block 52, Walnut Street connection to River Street and infill housing on Walnut Street. Implementation of this Plan will create two legacies. The first will be a revitalized Downtown with an economy and attractions that benefit all residents of Monticello. Equally important, however to the physical improvements described above will be the legacy of new partnerships and civic cooperation that are essential to and will result from coordinated actions. The ideas set forth in this Plan come from the vested interest of the Monticello community through a broad public outreach effort. The realization of these ideas rely on a coordinated, cooperative, and active public sector working in tandem with an entrepreneurial private sector The result will be a lively Downtown for all in Monticello, a place that embodies both its history and future aspirations. Goals � 000 00 weodtlw FFU E] I,. .�� 4 Improve Pine Street for All Users C DTI ` " Shift the Center of Town to Walnut and Broadway Encourage Small and Medium Scaled Investments "` _X NOTE:7his illustration depicts new deveopment on both private and public properties. The plan does not i Tu compel private property owners to change anything regarding how they use their land. Rather, the Plan is a /i� t. guide for change if the property owner chooses to do so. Please see page —for an illustration of the Master Plan as it applies to publicly held properties only. The City will endeavor to work with' existing business who wish to remain, revitalize and expand in the downtown.- City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Downtown is For Everyone Downtown Monticello is and shall remain the heart of the community. It is the birthplace of the City and the focus of civic activity. This Plan builds off those foundational qualities with a clear vision for the future of the core blocks of Downtown. The vision includes a commitment to retaining Broadway as Monticello's Main Street, supporting existing businesses, improving connections to and relationship with the River, and creating new downtown housing opportunities along Walnut and Cedar Avenues for existing and new Monticello residents. The Plan envisions a Downtown that is lively throughout the day and into the evening, 12 months of the year. A downtown that serves many purposes for many people - including dining, recreation, celebrating, gathering, shopping and living. Illustrative Master Plan The Plan above describes a potential long term build out of the core blocks of Downtown Monticello. Character Areas Similar to the Embracing Downtown Plan, the Plan divides the study area into four different character Areas. The purpose of this is to create sub -areas in downtown, each with its own identity and purpose and direction. The character areas are developed based on their context and their future role in the downtown. Typically each character area is a mix of uses, but also has a dominant use. Character Area: Riverfront A redesigned Park with an amphitheater and better relationship to Downtown will help connect the River to Downtown Character Area: Walnut Street and Cedar Street Walnut and Cedar Streets will fill in with new housing (2-4 stories) that adds to the market strength of downtown and provides additional housing choices for new and existing residents of Monticello. Their intersections with Broadway will be improved to make it easier to walk to the Riverfront Character Area: Broadway Monticello's Main Street will transition over time from a street with primarily services, to one with unique retail and restaurants. t Character Area: Pine Street (TH 25) The community will reclaim Pine Street by maintaining it's width and adding pedestrian amenities and local serving commercial uses. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Frameworks Land Use, Open Space and Transportation are the three frameworks that organize and define the physical environment. As with systems in the human body, each must function independently - and together with - the others. If one fails, they all fail. This is why it is important to understand frameworks as individual systems that must function as part of a single Downtown. The Plan is also divided into frameworks in order to allow different agencies, departments, and investors act in concert with each other. This will help ensure public and private investments are coordinated, less risky, and more publicly acceptable. Framework: Open Space and Parks (Primary recommednations) • Improve Riverfront Parks to accommodate more programming and events • Redesign Walnut Street and River Street to allow for park extention during events • Convert vacant lots on Broadway to small pocket parks • Utilize River islands for additional natural park space • Create pedestrian refuges or enhanced building entry ways on the corners of blocks along Pine Street • Enliven open spaces with public art wherever possible Framework: Access and Circulation • Emphasize connectivity throughout the Core, with pedestrian and bike friendly streets, a complete sidewalk system, and connectivity to the in -town neighborhoods. • Promote a "complete streets" policy that balances the needs of all users in the Downtown. • Manage and improve the grid system to support connectivity and access throughout Downtown • Work with MnDOT to improve Pine Street for users of Downtown Monticello, including additional signals, maintaining the River Street signal and supporting an additional river crossing • Improve pedestrian crossings of Broadway at Walnut and Cedar to improve access to the Riverfront • Reconnect Walnut Street with River Street Framework: Development and Land Use • Riverfront District with destination restaurant and entertainment uses, as well as housing • Broadway District with shopfront retail and restaurant uses beneath housing and offices • In -town neighborhoods extend to Walnut and Cedar Street with new infill housing 2-4 stories (apartments and townhouses) Additional recomendations are included in the Framewoirks Section pages 25-32 9 Open Space and Parks J 7� Access and Circulation Development and land Use :N Immediate Next Steps and Implementation 1. Improve the physical environment with streetscape, benches, programming, and art. 2. Bolster Broadway with a facade improvement program and retail recruitment. 3. Aggressively market development opportunities such as Block 52 and infill housing on Walnut and Cedar Street 4. Enact the appropriate policies, programs and incentives that enable the type of development described in the Plan. How is This Plan Related to the Embracing Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan? In 2010, the City of Monticello completed the "Embracing Downtown Plan". The full area considered to be "Downtown Monticello"extends from Interstate I-94 to the Mississippi River, and generally from Cedar Street to Maple Street. The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. Changes in the retail marketplace overall, and more specifically market changes and reinvestments in downtown Monticello, have created a need to develop a new planning perspective for the core blocks of the downtown. This document therefore is an update to the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan and to the Embracing Downtown Plan for the Downtown. This Plan will replace the Embracing Downtown plan as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Riverfront Perspective from Walnut street, looking across a redesigned West Bridge Park Riverfront Character Area: The and recomendations guidelines on this page pertain to the area colored on this diagram Despite being a town born on the River, the Downtown does not take great advantage of its unique location. Broadway is a block removed from the Riverfront and the main connection to the River, Walnut Street, ends in a staircase. The entry experience to Monticello from the north is mundane with vacant properties and a thick wall of trees that obscures potential views to public spaces and Downtown. The Riverfront Character Area will become a proud new public gathering space for Downtown Monticello that compliments Broadway and the full Monticello Park System. The Plan recommends redesigning the riverfront parks so they are more visible, accessible, active and flexible and promoting development that takes advantage of access to the river. A new park will be capable of handling larger crowds for events, and will be more accessible and usable on a daily basis with additional amenities and features designed for everyday use. The Plan promotes access to the riverfront by extending Walnut Street to connect to River Street. It will be designed as a multi- use street that can be closed for farmers markets, gatherings, and other events. The Plan recommends and leveraging public property of Block 52 to create a new signature development with market rate housing and a destination restaurant or entertainment use overlooking the park and the river. Public parking is maintained on Block 52 and added to River Street. existing _r Bridge Park River St Block 52 Broadway Site Sections Through Block 52 and West Bridge Park 0 Redesign Riverfront parks to © Encourage new housing include more active events and surrounding the riverfront programming in West Bridge Park parks on vacant and (amphitheater, water feature, underutilized parcels concessions) and passive uses in Maintain and improve the east bridge park. 0 intersection at River Street 0 Add parking and sidewalks to and Pine Street. River Street 0 Improve the underpass of OStreet Reconnect Walnut Street to River design Pine Street at the River. with a that allows Walnut Street be for © Consider a seasonal bridge to used to the island to provide events and park expansion. additional recreational OWork with the private sector to activity to east and west create a signature development Bridge park on Block 52, with market rate housing and a restaurant that overlooks the Park Precedent Images City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas Broadway Perspective on Broadway, looking west with a pocket park across the street Broadway Character Area: The and recomendations guidelines on this page pertain to the area colored on this diagram Broadway - west of Pine Street - has remained physically intact as Downtown's primary storefront district. Broadway is relatively well -maintained and home to several services and community anchors such as the Cornerstone Cafe. However, with growth of retail along the highway and elsewhere in town, Broadway is no longer a competitive location for general retail. The Plan recommends re -positioning the center of Downtown from the Pine/Broadway intersection to the Broadway/Walnut intersection. This will be partially accomplished with intersection improvements that make it easier to cross Broadway at Walnut Street. This should include curb extensions, fewer through lanes, clearer crosswalks, blinkers and eventually as warranted, a four-way stop sign. These improvements will increase the flow of pedestrian and bike traffic to the river and in between stores on both sides of Broadway. Small pocket parks can be developed on vacant lots mid -block on Broadway. These spaces can serve as convenient pedestrian connections between parking areas mid bloc and the sidewalks on Broadway. In addition, they can be small plazas with seating for resting, gathering, and even restaurants if the buildings next to them can be opened up to the pocket parks. Existing Proposed Pedestrian 75 Feet 63 Feet Crossing width Across Broadway East -bound Left Turn Lane Stacking Capacity 8 Cars 21 Cars 0 Existing Conditions Modify striping and median on Broadway 0 create a safer pedestrian environment. Small pocket parks on vacant properties that 0 offer respite from Broadway and pedestrian connections to parking in the middle of the block Curb extensions at Walnut and Broadway to 0 provide space for landscaping, seating, and gathering ONew development that replicates the storefront scale currently present on Broadway. New buildings should have flexible interiors so a main street scale can be accomplished in larger buildings. © Facade improvement programs that improve signage, awnings, and general appearance of existing storefronts on Broadway - - - - - - - - ---'---------- - —----------""�� '� ° — — — - - - - -------------- ~ II c ---- --------------u a New development along Broadway is encouraged if it replicates the scale of existing Proposed Lane _ buildings and shopfronts. Buildings up to four stories, with storefronts located on the Configurations on sidewalk and doors every 45' feet will fit in comfortably with existing buildings. Allowances Broadway w for 10 foot setbacks from the sidewalk to create additional pedestrian amenities (such as seating) are appropriate. The Plan does not recommend additional widening of Broadway. Instead, the Plan recommends working with partners to find other measures to mitigate congestion. ------------------------- r 000�o ----oo oo�o a—---------------H c y--------------- U a City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas Block 52 Active Frontage Flexible Frontage (either Active or Residential) Frontage And Ground Floor Uses Active frontages (high transparency) and uses (retail and restaurants) should be located on Broadway, Walnut, and the west half of River Street. The remainder of the block is flexible - it can have either residential or active frontages. Block 52 (Public ownership in blue) Block 52 is a key block in the Downtown. It is highly visible and it sits on the West Bridge Park. The site slopes approximately 15' from Broadway to River Street. Broadway and Walnut contain mercantile buildings of varying quality. River Street has vacant parcels and underutilized buildings. Building Setback l� Pocket Park & Open Space Setbacks, Pocket Parks & Open Space Buildings should define the perimeter of the Block. Minor setbacks (5'-10') for overhangs, seating, and display of goods is permitted on Broadway and Walnut. A more generous setback is permitted on Pine due to traffic volumes and access. Attached corner plazas are encouraged on the northwest corner of the block and permitted on the northeast and southeast corners. Surface Parking Access Way Parking & Servicing Access to mid block parking is encouraged on Pine Street and Walnut St. Parking should have minimal exposure to Broadway, River or Walnut St but should be large enough to replace the existing public parking lot on the block and should be expandable if the south side of the block redevelops. Careful consideration should be given to visibility and access to parking from Pine St since that will be the primary access as the site will be approached from the Bridge. Extra signage or a turning lane may be required. %\ 00 E► Bred -� C a� dy ■ Options The two illustrations above show potential options for development on Block 52 - both adhering to the guidelines. The top illustration shows new development on Broadway, articulated at a Main Street scale, with a corner plaza and a covered pass through as a form of pocket park. The bottom illustration shows a single corner development on Broadway, with a pocket park. Approaching Downtown from the Bridge Block 52 is the Gateway Block to Downtown from the Bridge. It is important to create an easy way for visitors to access mid -block parking as they approach downtown. The image to the left shows the approach - with enhanced landscaping, a turn lane, and clear signage to direct drivers to parking mid -block. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas N COMMERCIAL DESIGNATIONS There are four commercial and mixed land use designations as follows: Community Commercial A Community Commercial designation applies to existing commercial uses along State Highway 25, School Boulevard and Chelsea Road, as well as other small pockets of Monticello that include existing shopping centers, retailers and entertainment uses. The intent of Community Commercial is to provide locations for everyday retail goods and services generally oriented to a city-wide basis. Regional Commercial A Regional Commercial designation applies to areas targeted for uses that serve the traveling public and larger retail uses and commercial development intended for a regional market. This designation is generally applied to various areas along the Interstate 94 corridor with high visibility. The development character of the regional commercial development will continue to be auto -oriented, large format commercial uses such as `big -box' uses and other uses that require a large parking area. Looking to the future, opportunities for connectivity and design linkages between such development and nearby uses and neighborhoods will be emphasized. Downtown Mixed -Use The Downtown Mixed -Use category identifies and designates the downtown area as a primary development focus for downtown intended to improve, revitalize and redevelop Downtown Monticello as envisioned in the 2017 Downtown Small Area Plan. The goal is to transform downtown into a thriving commercial area with new mixed -use, specialty retail and restaurant uses with enhanced streetscape and pedestrian amenities. Entertainment uses, co -working spaces, boutiques and cafes are also envisioned. New downtown development should also embrace and be oriented towards the river whenever possible. Commercial/Residential Flex The Commercial/Residential Flex designation encourages the mix of flexible and compatible development of commercial, office, retail and residential uses in limited areas of the city on the same or adjacent properties. The purpose of this designation is to give the city and property owners flexibility for future land use based on market demand. The Commercial/Residential Flex designation is applied to a few of the remaining large vacant parcels in the City including the parcels located south of Chelsea Road and north of School Boulevard and centered along Dundas Road. This designation is also applied to parcels located between Interstate 94 and 7th Street West. These properties may be developed as commercial, residential, or mixed land uses under the city's PUD zoning, subject to review and approval of the City. u)" Required Retail Frontage Small Retail Opportunities Commercial Mixed -Use Multi -Family Housing Public Employment Park/OpenSpa Cemetery TABLE 3.3.- FUTURE LAND USE COMMERCIAL ACREAGES Source: Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan (2017) 60 (« LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION DOWNTOWN MIXED -USE (DMU) The Downtown Mixed -Use designation applies to the area of Monticello commonly known as the Downtown and further identified in the 2017 Downtown Monticello "Small Area Plan". This designation includes a commitment to retain Broadway as Monticello's Main Street, supporting existing businesses, improving connections to and relationship with the River, and creating new downtown housing opportunities along Walnut and Cedar Avenues. The purpose is to create a Downtown that is lively throughout the day and into the evening at all times of the year. Typically uses include retail, restaurants, local serving offices and services, as well as residential uses above the ground floor. Some ground floor residential uses may be allowed along Walnut, Cedar, 3rd or 4th Streets among others, subject to the location and discretion of the City. Commercial • Retail • Offices • Personal Services • Professional Services • Restaurants/Cafes • Recreation and Entertainment Residential • Multi -Family Residential Recreational • Parks/Playgrounds Primary Mode Pedestrian -friendly streetscape AVehicular (slow speeds) Secondary Mode Bicycle facilities and parking 11 Transit or shuttle service • Density - 25+ units/acre (Medium to High Density Residential) ~ 2018 Correlating • Floor Area Ratio Zoning District (FAR) 0.50 to 4.0 CCD Community • Height - Commercial District Up to 6 stories • Lot Area - N/A I««�1 («(« LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION Industrial and Employment Generating Areas The City uses three zoning districts to classify its industrial land based on use and locational aspects. Three new land use designations have been created based on these districts. The existing zoning district standards and their basic hierarchy is expected to remain, with development standards and use restrictions tailored to accommodate the particular needs of different industry types. However, the City may need to amend the zoning code to accommodate a range of new and modern industrial and employment generating uses, with consideration for any specific operational characteristics associated with such uses. The City should also continue to address potential impacts from industrial uses to nearby non -industrial uses. This is implemented through the zoning and the development review process, as well as the zoning ordinance performance standards that reduce the potential for land use conflicts. Strategies to reduce impacts related to vehicle storage, excessive dust and noise, landscaping and screening, and exterior lighting requirements can be included. Downtown Monticello The strategy for Downtown will rely on the City's Downtown Small Area Plan. Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan to achieve the vision of the Downtown will require a consistent approach between both planning documents. However, the Downtown Plan is the guiding document. Adjustments, as needed, to the existing zoning code will be one of the first steps. A significant catalytic project is needed to change perceptions of the Downtown. It is recommended that the City concentrate public investments in areas of the Downtown where a new sense of place can emerge. The City should actively promote and work towards a catalytic development project to help create a sense of place in the Downtown. This could include the Walnut Street corridor streetscape plan and connecting Walnut Street to River Street. New development projects, in particular Block 52, would make an exciting statement to the Mississippi riverfront and enliven this part of the Downtown. A new streetscape and new development along Walnut Street will reinforce the character of the corridor and connect the Downtown core near the riverfront to the Monticello Community Center, Cargill and other activity generators south of the Downtown. Mixed Neighborhoods & Commercial/Residential Flex Districts The Comprehensive Plan includes a new land use designation labeled Mixed Neighborhood. The purpose of this designation is to recognize areas of Monticello where a mix of residential housing types is the predominant use but could also have neighborhood serving commercial development that provides goods and services generally needed on a day-to-day basis. Commercial uses would typically be very small up to 1,000 square feet, while other areas near East Bertram designated MN may have larger neighborhoods which necessitate larger neighborhood centers. The City will need to amend the Zoning Code accordingly to accommodate such uses. Another new land use designation included in the Comprehensive Plan is referred to as Commercial/Residential Flex (CRF). The purpose of the Commercial/ Residential Flex designation is to give the City and property owners flexibility for future land use based on the economy and market demand. This designation allows a mix of flexible and compatible uses, such as commercial, office, retail and residential, in limited areas of the City on the same or adjacent properties. Development and improvement of properties designated as CRF will be implemented through the City's Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning process, subject to review and approval of the City. 190 IMPLEMENTATION Planning Commission Agenda: 12/07/21 3113. Consideration of Adopting Resolution PC-2021-051, a Resolution Finding that the Proposed Acquisition of Certain Land by the City of Monticello is Consistent with the Citv of Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan) Prepared by: Community Development Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Director 12/07/2021 Commission action): NA Additional Analysis by: City Administrator, Public Works Director/City Engineer ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt Resolution PC-2021-051 finding that the proposed acquisition of certain land by the City of Monticello is consistent with the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan). 2. Motion of other. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Planning Commission is asked to consider a recommendation finding that the acquisition of parcels 213-100-151400 and 213-100-153100 by the City of Monticello is in conformance to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The acquisition of the two vacant and undeveloped parcels is intended to facilitate the development of a new Public Works facility. The parcels are 19 and 50 acres, respectively. The properties are located outside of the current municipal boundary, but within the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area and within the "Primary Growth Area" of the city. Parcel 213-100-151400 is guided "Mixed Density Residential" within the current Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. Parcel 213-100-153100 is guided "Mixed Neighborhood" within the Monticello 204 Vision + Plan. Recognizing the need to provide basic municipal services to the community, the Comprehensive Plan identifies that public and institutional uses may be permitted in many zoning districts. The corresponding zoning ordinances for both guided land uses include the R-2 and R-3 Districts, which both allow "Public Buildings and Uses" as conditional uses within the districts. The Comprehensive Plan specifically requires the City to regularly conduct evaluations and needs assessments of the Public Works facility and other City buildings. Following a recent evaluation of the condition of the existing Public Works building and the costs to repair and expand that building, the City Council reached a consensus that a new facility and site are needed. The timing for development and construction is currently unknown. However, to continue meeting Goals citied in the Community Facility and Infrastructure portion of the Planning Commission Agenda: 12/07/21 Monticello 2040 Plan, which cites the need for well -maintained City facilities and regularly maintained infrastructure, consideration of a Public Works new site is necessary. The City's Capital Improvement Plan also includes the development of a Public Works Facility as a financial planning priority. City officials and staff have carefully considered multiple sites for the future development of a new Public Works facility over the last 15 years. This included evaluation of the city's growth patterns, service needs, adjacent land uses, size of site for initial and future growth, and travel times for the efficiency of Public Works/Engineering vehicle travel. The parcels proposed for acquisition met all parameters for the siting of a Public Works facility, as it the location is ideally situated for adequate access to the Monticello community via School Boulevard and the ability to adequately buffer the site from adjacent uses. The land area to be acquired is of sufficient size to consider the final configuration needed for the Public Works facility and allows for the remaining land to be developed consistent with the comprehensive plan. Further, the corresponding zoning following annexation is consistent with the Monti 2040 Plan and supports the siting of the facility at this location. The City considered entering into a purchase agreement on the property at its regular November 8th meeting, which is contingent on the Planning Commission's finding. The Commission's role is to provide a report to the City on the conformance of the acquisition to the adopted Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City staff supports Alternative #1 above. Acquisition of this property by the City is consistent with the Monticello 2040 Plan's goals of providing continued efficient municipal services to the community. The current Public Works site has outlived its useful life and the City's Capital Improvement Plan anticipates its relocation and expansion. As the City continues to grow, selecting a site is critical to future planning and service. The parcels proposed for acquisition are centrally located within the community, provide adequate space for growth and site buffering, and the proposed use is consistent with the recommended comprehensive plan guidance and corresponding zoning. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2021-051 B. Aerial Image C. Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan, Excerpts D. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts E. Council Report, 11/8/21 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-051 A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LAND FOR BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is proposing to acquire certain property identified by parcel identification numbers 213-100-151400 and 213-100-153100 ("Property") pursuant to the terms of the proposed purchase agreement ("Purchase Agreement") between the City of Monticello ("Buyer") and Ocello, LLC ("Seller"); and WHEREAS, the Buyer desires to convey the Property and the Seller desires to purchase the Property under the terms of the Purchase Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council has identified the relocation of a municipal Public Works Facility within its adopted Capital Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed property acquisition is intended to facilitate the Monticello Comprehensive Plan's goals for efficient municipal services and facility evaluation and maintenance; and WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 462.356, subd. 2, requires that the Planning Commission review the City's proposed acquisition of real property for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, and to report to the City Council in writing its findings; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: 1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.356, subd. 2., the Planning Commission finds that the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property under the Purchase Agreement is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. ADOPTED this of Monticello, Minnesota. day of , 2021, by the Planning Commission of the City CITY OF MONTICELLO -32 218778v1 ATTEST: Angela Schuman Community Development Director 21s77sv1 r ' 1 1. I SCHOOL BLVD C9� • Q� t F t I f .; .' •,�• 88TH=ST NE _Q �Q w "r -u+ ui UJI PVE=NE =87TH S_T_'NE-w GROWTH STRATEGY MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP MIXED NEIGHBORHOOD (MN) The Mixed Neighborhood designation applies to areas of the City intended for mixed land use types including single-family detached housing, duplexes, townhomes, and medium - density multi -family buildings as well as small scale commercial uses. Residential densities in these areas generally range between 8 and 12 units per acre, corresponding to site area allowances of 3,500-5,400 square feet per unit. These areas are residential in character but could also have neighborhood serving commercial uses that provide for the sale of goods and services generally needed on a day-to-day basis. The character of these areas is defined by the limited scale of businesses operating in these designations and may include local services, offices, small-scale retail stores and childcare centers. Other compatible uses, such as schools, nursing homes, fraternal organizations, private parks and religious facilities may also locate in this designation. Residential • Single -Family Residential • Two -Family Residential • Multi -Family Residential • Senior Living Facility Commercial • Small Scale Office/ Retail • Daycare Centers • Personal Service Public/institutional • Schools Recreational • Parks/Playgrounds Open Space • Sensitive Habitat Primary Mode Vehicular (slow speeds) Secondary Mode R. Pedestrian paths /1 and trails C�b Bicycle facilities and parking f Transit or Shuttle Service • Density - 8-12 units/acre (Low -Mid Density Residential) • Height - 1-2 stories • Lot Area - 3,500-5,400 sq. ft. per unit �2018 Correlating Zoning District TN Traditional Neighborhood District R-2 Single and Two Famil Residence District R-3 Medium Density Residential District B-1 Neighborhood Business District MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN MIXED -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR) The Mixed -Density Residential designation applies to areas of the City where mixed housing types and medium to high density housing are appropriate. Housing types could include attached housing such as apartments, townhomes, condominiums and multi -family buildings. It may also includes areas appropriate for small -lot single-family homes and cottage homes. Densities generally range between 8 to 25 units per acres corresponding to site area allowances of 1,700-5,000 square feet per unit. Allowed density is dependent on adjacent land uses, existing building form and character and other factors. Higher densities are permitted at the discretion of the City. These areas have mixed housing types and reflect a denser, more urban environment. Buildings in these areas are generally between two to five stories and may have surface parking. Other compatible uses, such as schools, nursing homes, parks and religious facilities may also locate in this designation. Residential Medium to High Density (Residential characterized by a wide mix of housing types) • Senior Living Facility Public/institutional • Schools Recreational • Parks/Playgrounds Open Space • Sensitive Habitat Primary Mode Vehicular (slow speeds) Secondary Mode Pedestrian paths and trails Bicycle facilities and parking Transit or Shuttle Service • Density - 8 - 25+ units/acre 2018 Correlating (Medium to High Zoning District Density Residential) R-3 • Height - Medium Density 1-5 stories Residential District • Lot Area - R-4 Medium -High Density 1,700-5,000 Residence District sq. ft. per unit LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION COMMUNITY FACILITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS Listed below are the Community Facilities and Infrastructure goals which were informed by the Community Vision. For the complete set of policies and strategies for the goals refer to the Implementation Chapter. GOAL 1: COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES Well maintained City facilities and services distributed equitably to all residents of Monticello. GOAL 2: EDUCATIONAL AND HEALTH FACILITIES A collaborative relationship with the School District, CentraCare Hospital and other educational and health service providers to ensure comprehensive health and education service in Monticello. GOAL 3: PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION A collaborative environment with non-profit organizations, childcare facilities, and social services as a commitment to meet community needs. GOAL 4: UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE A complete and well -maintained utility system providing service to all residents and extended into the Orderly Annexation Area only when development occurs, pays for the extensions and the development site is incorporated into the city boundaries. GOAL 5: MAINTENANCE AND FUNDING Regularly maintained utilities and infrastructure in the City and a variety of mechanisms established for ongoing maintenance funding. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 183 IMPLEMENTATION CHART: COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE SHORT- I LONG- ONGOING THEME TERM TERM Policy 1.1. City, Library and Senior Facilities and Services Continue to provide, improve and promote City-wide facilities and public services including the community/recreation center, senior center, library services, and other Strategy 1.1.1- Continue to invest in and strengthen the Monticello Community Center as a major downtown asset and center for the community. O ((( ))) . . . Strategy 1.1.2 - Regularly conduct evaluations and needs assessments of the Public Works facility and other City buildings. facilities and programming for O the community. Policy 1.2 - Sustainable Measures in City Facilities Strategy 1.2.1- Consider cost-effective energy efficiency retrofits on City buildings in order to reduce both greenhouse gas emissions and y Consider energy efficiency operating costs. measures and use of on -site renewable energy for all City facilities. Strategy 1.2.2 - Reduce energy consumption of municipal streetlights by converting existing lamps to LED, induction, or other more efficient O O "smart' lighting technology. Strategy 1.2.3- Support efforts to install solar recharging stations for hybrid and electric O vehicles and other efforts to provide plug-in recharging stations. Strategy 1.2.4- Continue evaluating possible solar, wind and other renewable energy sources 0 4for City facilities. Strategy b2.5-Evaluate alternative fuel/ electric vehicles for City use. O �a O 61NITICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN .(« IMPLEMENTATM CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section S. i Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Use Types "P" = Permitted .. Conditionally. Permitted • , "I" = Interim Permitted Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(C)(2)(a) - Duplex p C 5.2(C)(21(b) 5.2(C)(21(c) 5.2(C)(21(dl - Townhouse C p - Multiple -Family C P C C Detached Dwelling p p p p p p None Group Residential P P P P P 5 2(C)(3) Facility, Single Family Group Residential C C C 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Multi -Family Mobile & Manufactured Home Park C C C P C 5.2(C)(4) Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities (public) P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p None Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5.2(D)(1) (private) Assisted Living Facilities C P C C P 5.2 D 2 Cemeteries C C C C C C C 5.2 D 3 Clinics/Medical Services C p p C None Essential Services p p p p p p p p p p p p p C p p None 5.2(D)(4) Hospitals C p p Nursing/Convalescent C C C C C C C C C P P 5.2(D)(5) Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2 D 6 Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5.2 D 7 Public Warehousing I I I 5.2(D)(8) Temporary Schools, K-12 C C C C C C I I 5.2 D 9 Schools, Higher None Education C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2 D 10 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 359 CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.2 Use -Specific Standards Subsection (D) Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses (ii) Site planning shall minimize parking lot development adjacent to public area in the district, including streets, pathways, and open spaces. (7) Public Buildings or Uses: (a) When abutting a residential use in a residential use district, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type `B") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. (b) Conformity with the surrounding neighborhood is maintained and required setbacks and side yard requirements are met. (8) Public Warehousing, Temporary (a) The use shall be allowed by Interim Use Permit, with a termination date of no later than five (5) years from the date of approval. (b) The interim use shall apply to public storage of equipment only, and shall not apply to any private entity, either during or after the term of the permit. (c) The use, if not allowed as a permitted principal use, may be a "Secondary Use" allowed on the property, separate and unrelated to the principal use. (d) The use shall occupy indoor storage only, in one or more existing buildings, and shall not include outdoor storage. (e) The use shall otherwise meet all zoning and building code standards. (f) The use shall not interfere with other permitted, conforming private uses of the property, nor with the provision of public services to the property or the neighborhood in which it is located. (g) No signage shall be allowed identifying the use, other than permitted directional signage on the property. (9) Pre-K-12 Schools (public or private): (a) Educational institutions on parcels exceeding 20,000 square feet in area shall be located with direct frontage on, and access to, a collector or arterial street. (b) The buildings are set back from adjoining residential districts a distance no less than double the adjoining residential setback. Page 376 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Agenda: 12/07/21 3C. Consideration to appoint Paul Konsor and Andrew Tapper to new 3-Year terms on the Planning Commission. (AS) ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: 1. Motion to nominate Commissioner Paul Konsor for a three-year term to the Planning Commission, effective January 1, 2022. 2. Motion of other. Decision 2: 1. Motion to nominate Commissioner Andrew Tapper for a three-year term to the Planning Commission, effective January 1, 2022. 2. Motion of other. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Commission is asked to recommend appointment or action for expiring commission terms. Commissioner Konsor and Tapper's terms end December 2021. Both Commissioners have indicated a willingness to serve another three-year term. As such, Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the appointment. Current terms for the Commission are as follows. Planning Commission Andrew Tapper 3 yr 12/2021 (3-year staggered terms) Paul Konsor 3 yr 12/2021 Alison Zimpfer 3 yr 12/2022 Teri Lehner 3 yr 1212023 Eric Hagen 3 yr 12/2023 Council Charlotte Gabler liaison Commission recommendations on appointments will be considered for ratification by the City Council on December 13, 2021. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff defers to the Planning Commission on matters of appointment. SUPPORTING DATA: A. City Code - Planning Commission PLANNING COMMISSION § 32.001 NAME OF THE COMMISSION. The name of the organization shall be the Monticello Planning Commission. (Prior Code, § 2-1-1) § 32.002 AUTHORIZATION. (A) The authorization for the establishment of this Commission is set forth under M.S. Ch. 462, Municipal Planning Enabling Act, as it may be amended from time to time. (B) The Planning Commission is hereby designated the planning agency of the city pursuant to the Municipal Planning Act. (Prior Code, § 2-1-2) § 32.003 MEMBERSHIP. The Planning Commission shall consist of five members appointed by the City Council. All members shall be residents of the city and shall have equal rights and privileges. (Prior Code, § 2-1-3) § 32.004 TERM OF OFFICE. (A) Appointments. All members shall be appointed for three-year terms ending on December 31 of a given year; however, the term may be terminated earlier by the City Council. Terms shall be staggered so that no more than two members' terms shall expire in a given year. The terms are to commence on the day of appointment by Council. Every appointed member shall, before entering upon the discharge of his or her duties, take an oath that he or she will faithfully discharge the duties of office. (B) Renewals. When an expiring member's term is up, such member may be reappointed by Council with the effective date of the new term beginning on the first day of the next year following the expiration. (Prior Code, § 2-1-4) § 32.005 ATTENDANCE. It is the City Council's intention to encourage Planning Commission members to attend all Planning Commission meetings. Should any Planning Commission member be absent for more than three meetings in a calendar year, that member may be subject to replacement by the Council. (Prior Code, § 2-1-5) § 32.006 VACANCY. Any vacancy in the regular or at -large membership shall be filled by the City Council, and such appointee shall serve for the unexpired term so filled. (Prior Code, § 2-1-6) § 32.007 OFFICERS. (A) Elections. The City Planning Commission shall elect at its January meeting from its membership a Chair, Vice Chair, and a Secretary who shall serve for a term of one year and shall have powers as may be prescribed in the rules of the Commission. (B) Duties of Chair. The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Planning Commission and shall have the duties normally conferred and parliamentary usage of such officers. (C) Duties of Vice Chair. The Vice Chair shall act for the Chair in his or her absence. (D) Duties of Secretary. (1) A Secretary may be appointed who is not a member of the Planning Commission but can be employed as a member of city staff. (2) The Secretary shall keep the minutes and records of the Commission; and with the assistance of staff as is available shall prepare the agenda of the regular and special meetings for Commission members, arrange proper and legal notice of hearings when necessary, attend to correspondence of the Commission, and handle other duties as are normally carried out by a Secretary. (Prior Code, § 2-1-7) § 32.008 MEETINGS. (A) The Planning Commission shall hold at least one regular meeting each month. This meeting shall be held on the first Tuesday. Regular meeting times shall be established by the Commission and approved annually with the regular meeting schedule of Council and Commission. Hearings shall be heard as soon thereafter as possible. The Planning Commission shall adopt rules for the transaction of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings, which record shall be a public record. The meeting shall be open to the general public. (B) In the event of conflict for a regularly -scheduled meeting date, a majority at any meeting may change the date, time, and location of the meeting. (C) Special meetings may be called by the chair or two members of the Planning Commission together, as needed, and shall be coordinated with city staff. (Prior Code, § 2-1-8) § 32.009 QUORUM. A majority of all voting Planning Commission members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. (Prior Code, § 2-1-9) § 32.010 DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION. (A) The Commission has the powers and duties assigned to it under M.S. Ch. 462, Municipal Planning Enabling Act, as it may be amended from time to time, by this code, and state law. (Prior Code, § 2-1-10) (B) The Planning Commission shall act as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals for the Monticello zoning ordinance and shall act according to procedures as established by the Monticello zoning ordinance. § 32.011 AMENDMENTS. This subchapter may be amended as recommended by the majority vote of the existing membership of the Planning Commission and only after majority vote of the City Council. (Prior Code, § 2-1-11) § 32.012 COMPENSATION. Compensation of members of the Commission shall be as set forth in city code for fee schedule. (Prior Code, § 2-1-12) (Ord. 336, passed 11-22-1999; Ord. 337, passed 1-10-2011; Ord. 593, passed 3-10-2014; Ord. 607, passed 1-26-2015) Planning Commission Agenda — 12/07/21 3D. Consideration to appoint a Planning Commission member to The Pointes at Cedar Compass Committee ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1. Motion to appoint Commissioner and Commissioner as alternate to serve on the Compass Committee for the Professional Engineering, Park & Open Space Planning and Landscape Architecture Services project. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND On November 81", the City Council selected WSB to complete the Grading, Park and Open Space & Landscape Architecture project for The Pointes at Cedar. A steering committee is being formed to support the City and WSB on this project. The group will include a cross-section of community representation for purposes of continuing to guide the project for the benefit of the community and region. The Planning Commission is asked to continue their role in in the project, appointing a representative to the Compass Committee. Commissioner Zimpfer, who served previously on the proposal selection team, has expressed interest in serving on this committee. Staff would recommend that Planning Commission also appoint an alternate to the committee for coverage purposes. An informational flyer on the Compass Committee is attached for reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Commission's continued involvement as The Pointes at Cedar SAP is implemented. Staff defers to the Commission on appointments. SUPPORTING DATA A. Compass Committee Information Compass Committee Imagining I Guiding I Connecting t Monticello Overview The Pointes at Cedar, formerly known as Chelsea Commons, reimagines how a large land area in the core of Monticello will develop over time. It takes into consideration the changing ways people want to live, work, and play, creating a unique place which combines economic development opportunities, residential living, and public recreation. The Pointes at Cedar is intended to accelerate quality private development in the area and act as a catalyst for additional growth and community connection. As representatives of the community, The Pointes at Cedar Compass Committee will provide strategic guidance, feedback, and act as community liaisons throughout the design process. The committee will represent the community's vision, needs, and provide insight on challenges and issues. As liaisons and voice to the greater community, the committee will communicate accurate information to the community they represent, as well as direct feedback to the appropriate channels. The purpose of the Compass Committee is to serve as a voice for the community and provide lived experiences and expertise as individuals who live, work, and play in Monticello. Committee Member Responsibilities Each member of the Compass Committee agrees to: 1. Attend as many of the meetings identified below as able and participate in discussions by sharing ideas and expertise. 2. Be a voice to advance the broader interests of the community. 3. Routinely report back to their organization or community with accurate project details and updates. 4. Report feedback from the community and direct feedback to the group. 5. Listen to and respect the viewpoints of other committee members. Membership Membership is intended to represent the diversity of interests and stakeholders that live, work, and play in Monticello. Meetings Anticipate nine meetings - approximately one every other month beginning in December 2021. Planning Commission Agenda—12/07/21 3E. Community Development Director's Report Council Action on/related to Commission Recommendations A. Public Hearing — Consideration of request for Conditional Use Permit for Group Residential Facility, Multi -Family in an R-2 (Single and Two -Family) Residence District. Applicant: Kimber, James & Yassa Approved on November 22" d City Council consent agenda. B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Request for Amendment to Interim Use Permit to allow Extraction/Excavation of Materials in the B-3 (Highway Business) and B-4 (Regional Business) Districts Applicant: City of Monticello Approved on November 22" d City Council consent agenda. C. Consideration of Tabled Item - Consideration of a request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition for Monticello Meadows, a proposed 200-unit multi -family residential project in a B-4 (Regional Business) District. Applicant: Baldur Real Estate, LLC Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD approved on the November 22" d regular City Council agenda. The approvals were conditioned on a modified set of Exhibit Z conditions 9attached), including an added Council condition for the addition of brick/stone on the community building and garage facades. D. Consideration of a request for Simple Subdivision and Lot Combination for six parcels located in the R-2 (Single and Two -Family Residence) District. Applicant: Michaelis, Jeff and Joan Approved on November 22" d City Council consent agenda. Planning Commission Workplan Update - 2022 A draft update to the 2021-2025 Planning Commission Workplan has been prepared for Planning Commission review and comment. Last month, a status update on the existing plan was provided. The Planning Commission's Workplan was drafted in 2021 following the adoption of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The Workplan uses the Monticello 2040 Plan as its foundation. The Workplan spans a 5-year period between 2021 and 2025, recognizing that many of the workplan items are on -going efforts or require multi -year focus. The workplan provides important direction on projects, training, and information necessary to support the Commission's role as the City's planning agency. Planning Commission Agenda—12/07/21 The 2022 Workplan update removes completed items from the 2021 document. The workplan items remaining are those that were incomplete as of the end of 2021 or are those which require on -going effort and attention. Commission's comments on the draft workplan are welcome. Staff would request any feedback or comments no later than December 30t". Pending any other workshops prior to the regular meeting, staff would also propose a short workshop to review the workplan and comments in January. For Commission's reference in developing comments or suggestions relating to the workplan, the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan can be found at: https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/274/Monticello-2040 The Pointes at Cedar Project Updates On November 8t", the City Council authorized a contract with WSB and associated to complete the Grading, Park and Open Space and Landscaping Architecture planning for The Pointes at Cedar. As noted in item 3D, a Compass Committee is forming to provide citizen input into that process. The Zoning Ordinance Work Group has also begun their work. The first meeting of the group was held on December 111. Progress was made in determining a direction for ordinance format. The next meeting of the Work Group is December 1st Staff is hoping to provide a digest of meeting summaries to keep City boards and commissions up to date on project happenings. Census Data Recently released Census data on Monticello's population is attached for reference. The information comes from the State Demographer's office. Council Updates Highlights: https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/Blog.aspx?CID=3 CMRP Updates The City of Monticello provided an update on community and economic development initiatives to the CMRP on December 1st. A copy of that presentation is attached. 2 CITY OF Monticello Monticello Planning Commission 2021-2025 Workplan 2021 UPDATE The Monticello Planning Commission is established to advise the Mayor, Council and Community Development Department in matters concerning planning and land use matters; to review and make recommendations regarding the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan, subdivision and zoning ordinances and other planning rules and regulations; to establish planning rules and regulations; and to conduct public hearings. Purpose Statement: The Planning Commission will support efforts to implement the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The Planning Commission will work collaboratively with the City Council, other City boards and commissions, and community stakeholders in its work to achieve the Plan and the strategic goals of the city. Organizational & Training Activities: • Complete the Basics of Land Use and My Roles as a Planning Commissioner through Fusion Learning Partnership. • Continue to support regional planning as identified by the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 1.10.1- Consider the outcomes of regional planning initiatives and participate in processes resulting from the efforts of the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership. • Initiate and/or facilitate organizational projects in support of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 1.1.1 - Facilitate biannual meetings to serve as a "Development Forum" with interested property owners, realtors, builders and developers to discuss long-term planning, real estate market conditions. ■ Strategy 1.1.2 - Develop and publish a 'Development Opportunity Map' for use by the public, property owners and development community that identifies vacant and potential development opportunity sites, as well as pending and approved projects with the City and MOAA. Comprehensive Plan Activities: • Support the implementation of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan through implementation of the Goals, Policies and Strategies identified within the Plan. • Support the priority projects set by the City Council, including the small area planning for Chelsea Commons (now The Pointes at Cedar) area and reinvestment in Block 52 in Downtown Monticello. 11Page Zoning Ordinance/Map Activities: Complete the recodification of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, including consideration of amendments as recommended in the Goals, Policies and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. o Review and revise the zoning ordinance consistent with the 2021-2022 Zoning Ordinance Strategy priorities set by the Planning Commission per Attachment A. • Consider amendments to the Monticello Official Zoning Map in support of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan guided land use, including, but not limited to the following. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 2.7.1 - Amend the Zoning Map to be consistent with the Future Land Use Map and identify areas where mixed -density residential uses are appropriate. Subdivision Ordinance Activities: • Complete a review and amendment of the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance, including consideration of amendments as recommended in the Goals, Policies and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan as follows. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 2.5.1- Implement measures to slow down or "calm" traffic on local streets by using design techniques and measures to improve traffic safety, provide eyes on the street, and enhance the quality of life in Monticello's neighborhoods. Strategy 3.8.2 - Require pedestrian and bike connections in new commercial development. ■ Strategy 6.5.1- Conduct regular review of parkland allocation and ensure sufficient amount of land is designated for parks and recreation activities in the City as the population increases. Research & City Department Update Topics As resources and time allow, the Planning Commission will consider research and information related to the following topic areas. Topic Status of municipal infrastructure Tree preservation —Zoning ordinance section 4.2 21Page DATE: September 30, 2021 TO: Rachel Leonard, City Administrator City of Monticello FROM: Susan Brower ivinnesota State Demographer SUBJECT: 2020 Census Population and Household Counts Here are the April 1, 2020 counts from the U.S. Census Bureau: Total Population: 14,455 Household Population: 14,300 Group Quarters Population: 155 Total Housing Units: 55664 Occupied Housing Units (Households): 5,485 Vacant Housing Units: 179 These data are provided as a courtesy by the State Demographic Center. The State Demographic Center cannot make any changes to these numbers. Questions about the accuracy or quality of these numbers should be directed to the Census Bureau. If you have any questions or comments about using or interpreting these counts, the State Demographic Center is here to help. Please contact the State Demographic Center by mail at 300 Centennial Office Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155, phone (651) 201-2474 or send an e-mail to local. estimates (2state.mn.us. Community Update: Rachel Leonard, City Administrator CMRCENTRAL MISSISSIPPI RIVER REGIONAL PLANNING PARTNERSHIP City of Monticello Monticello: Housing Construction Monticello is striving for balanced life -cycle housing throughout the community. We continue to experience the greatest pressure for multi -family development; however, we've been encouraged by additional phases of existing neighborhoods and conceptual proposals for new single-family developments. Single -Family Homes • Haven Ridge Phase 1: 27 units • Featherstone 5th Addition: 26 units • Edmonson Ridge: 54 units Featherstone & Edmonson Ridge Multi -Family Homes • Willows Landing: 92 senior living units, Headwaters Development • Stoneybrook: 28 twin -home units • Deephaven: 165 market -rate rental units o Phase 1 completed in July 2021 o Phase 2 permit issued in July 2021 o Phase 3 permit issued in August 2021 Monticello: HousingProposals We have a mix of housing projects currently moving through the approval process, including market rate, affordable, and senior projects. Projects Pending Approval: • Haven Ridge 2nd Addition: 47 single-family units • Headwaters West: 60 twin -home units and 108 apartment units (senior project with an affordable component) • Twin Pines: 93 multi -family units • Monticello Lakes: 200 multi -family units CMRRL��,--_T,-R,A L MISSISSIPPI RIVER AL PLANNING PARTNERSHIP Monticello: Commercial Development Monticello is experiencing commercial development that encompasses new construction, business expansion, and new use of existing buildings. New Construction • Due North Car Wash: 8,208 sf state-of-the-art car wash • Storage Link: 84,300 sf of new storage buildings • Healing Moments Counseling: 5,000 sf counseling facility • Take 5 Car Wash*: 4,000 sf facility for nationwide car wash brand CMRRL��,--T,ORN_,,,,1L,,NN AL MSSISSIPPI RIVER ING PARTNERSHIP Business Expansions • Aldi: 963 sf addition to facilitate drive-up/pick-up • Runnings: 13,000 sf addition • Rustech Brewing: 2,000 sf expansion in their building Change in Use • Hammer's Hair Lounge • Cocktails on Broadway • Northern Lights Gifts • Ped-a-Go Electric Bikes • Monticello DMV • Lazydays RV: Reuse of 45,000+ sf existing building Monticello: Mixed Use Development Downtown: Block 52 One of the most visible city blocks, it was identified for revitalization and a signature project. The City and EDA acquired about 80% of the block & have a preliminary development agreement for a new vertical mixed use project. The initial indication is for approximately 90 upper -floor residential units and about 30,000 sf of main floor commercial. E Downtown Monticello r 3 � Block 52' CMRPL',,-.,T',.o,A,,,, MISSISSIPPI RIVER L PLANNING PARTNERSHIP The Pointes at Cedar t..- The Pointes at Cedar reimagines how aFB central 100 acres will develop over ✓e, ` time. It's focused on creating a unique place that combines economic development } ` �✓k y opportunities, residential living, and w public recreation. J,r" -Li r It's intended to accelerate quality ' private development in the area and act r� as a catalyst for additional growth and community connection."� n, The Pointes is centered around interconnected lakes bordered by and spaces. The pathways public public spaces will be bounded by a mix of commercial and residential spaces.1I;' Monticello: Industrial Development Similar to commercial development, Monticello has experienced industrial growth that combines new construction with expansions by existing businesses. Current • UMC Expansion: 58,000 sf expanded/new building • Xcel Energy Cooling Towers: 2 towers completed in 2021, 2 anticipated in 2022 • Nuss Truck & Equipment: 30,000 sf building • Jensen Manufacturing Expansion: 7,500 sf Pending • Project Suburban: 21,400 sf expansion at current site in 2022 • Project Stallion: 35,000 sf expansion, 15 jobs • Project Shepherd: 21,500 sf expansion, 5 jobs • Project Integrity: 65,000 sf new construction Other • Shovel Ready Site Certifications: Completing applications to certify 3 City/EDA sites in Otter Creek Business Park. CMREL��,-.,T�,A L MISSISSIPPI RIVER ONAL PLANNING PARTNERSHIP Monticello: Infrastructure and Other Efforts Infrastructure • Streets: 2022 project includes mill and overlay as well as ongoing efforts to fill sidewalk and pathway gaps throughout the city. • Public Works Facility: Property purchase in 2021, design in 2022, and anticipated construction in 2023. • Utility Comprehensive Plans: Completing updated water & sewer plans in 2021 using 2040 Comp Plan projections. Updates to CIP and additional analysis for future development in 2022. Other efforts • Community Energy Transition Plan: Received $500,000 grant for strategic transition planning focused on reducing reliance on Xcel Energy. • Downtown Facade Improvement Program: EDA program focused on downtown block. Allows grants of $50,000 with 5% owner contribution. First building complete and two more applications under review. • MontiArts Initiative: Ongoing placemaking efforts focused on the downtown area. In 2021 new sculptures, murals, and events added using grants and volunteer efforts. CMR1 CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI RIVER REGIONAL PLANNING PARTNERSHIP