The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Agenda - 01/04/2022AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 4th, 2022 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, Alison Zimpfer, Eric Hagen and Teri Lehner Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Hayden Stensgard, and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Regular Meeting Minutes— December 3, 2021 C. Citizen Comments D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda E. Consideration to approve agenda 2. Public Hearing A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for Cross Access and Preliminary and Final Plat of Deephaven 3rd Addition in the B-4 Regional Business District. Applicant: Deephaven Development, LLC 3. Regular Agenda A. Introduction of Fire Marshal Dan Klein B. Consideration of the Community Development Director's Report 4. Added Items 5. Adjournment MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, December 71", 2021 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, Alison Zimpfer, Eric Hagen and Teri Lehner Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Ron Hackenmueller and Hayden Stensgard 1. General Business A. Call to Order Chairperson Paul Konsor called the regular meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 6:03 p.m. B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Special Meeting Minutes —July 6, 2021 ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FROM JULY 6, 2021, PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 5-0. b. Regular Meeting Minutes —November 1, 2021 ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FROM NOVEMEBR 1, 2021, TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 5-0. C. Citizen Comments D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda Angela Schumann noted that Councilmember Gabler requested an update on the Monticello Lakes project and added that staff was prepared to discuss. Item was added as item "4A" to the agenda. E. Consideration to approve agenda ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA FOR THE DECEMBER 7, 2021, REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ALISON ZIMPFER SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 5-0. 2. Public Hearing A. Public Hearing — Consideration of an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for a Retail Building Expansion in the Central Communitv District (CCD) licant: JR & R II LLC City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the item to the Planning Commission and the public. The expansion of the Runnings Supply building along 7t" Street West will be along the West side of the building roughly 14,000 square feet. Grittman noted that this is the second amendment to this specific PUD. Because this building is in the CCD, there is a height standard that applies to this expansion, but the applicants are looking for flexibility in this. Staff finds this to be a reasonable request due to this building not being in the center of the CCD district. Andrew Tapper asked where the applicant will be able to meet condition seven (7) in Exhibit Z that calls for additional landscaping. Steve Grittman clarified that the perimeter areas along 7th street are possible spaces for additional landscaping. The added landscaped required in Exhibit Z is not expected to be at a massive scale. Chairperson Paul Konsor opened the public hearing. Jack Grausam, District Manager at Runnings Supply made the comment that there is a fire hydrant directly behind the building and there is a pathway to it. He understands if the added fire hydrant required by staff was still necessary, but wanted everyone to be aware of the one directly behind the building. Mr. Konsor asked what that fire hydrant meant for the condition in Exhibit Z that required the addition of a hydrant. Mr. Grittman clarified that the added fire hydrant would be necessary to fight fire on the northwest end of the building. Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing. ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2021-046, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A RETAIL BUILDING ADDITION IN THE CCD, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT Z, BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. ALISON ZIMPFER SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 5-0. EXHIBIT Z Planned Unit Development Amendment Runnings Supply, Inc. Lot 2, Block 1, Kirkman Addition and Outlot C, Kirkman Addition 300 West 7th Street 1. The site plan shall be modified to illustrate the intended design of the parking area with the removal of the 18 referenced stalls and the possible addition of a row -end parking island. 2. The applicant shall confirm on their site plan all locations of intended outdoor display and sales area, which shall not exceed code allowances of 30% of the floor area and shall not reduce the minimum amount of required parking on the site. 3. The proposed fire lane shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire Marshal. At minimum, widening of the lane is required to 24 feet, and turning movement/access for City fire apparatus is demonstrated. An additional hydrant will be required along the north side of the building, and other requirements of the City's fire officials are addressed. 4. Fencing around the west perimeter of the outdoor storage area shall match the existing opaque materials. 5. For the portion of the outdoor storage area which extends north of the front building line of the store, decorative fencing as noted in this report (similar to that utilized by Walmart as example) shall be provided. 6. The height of the building addition (15' - 8") is acknowledged as being acceptable (via the flexibility granted via PUD processing). 7. The applicant will be required to provide additional landscaping for the additional building perimeter, per code requirements. 8. The applicant shall confirm that no changes to existing trash/recycling handling activities are anticipated. 9. No new site signage is included with this project. 10. Issues related to site grading, drainage and utilities shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. B. Public Hearing— Consideration of Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, Develoament Stage Planned Unit Develoament and Preliminary Plat of Twin Pines Apartments, a 93-unit multi -family residential project in a B-4 (Regional Business) District Applicant: Kjellberg, Kent Mr. Grittman provided an overview of the item to the Planning Commission and the Public. This was brought to the Planning Commission at a prior time, but this is a new review of the similar plans due to the expiration of prior approvals. Staff recommends approval as it is a good fit from a land use standpoint and is consistent with the prior approval of this similar project. Mr. Konsor asked about the trash enclosure and if that would take up a parking space or more. Mr. Grittman clarified that the trash enclosure is already shown on the parking plan under the residential part of the building and that it still meets the minimum parking on site. Mr. Konsor asked about the driveway design and if there would be a buffer for the adjacent homes to avoid car lights shining into homes. Community Development Director Angela Schumann noted that there is a berm located on the East side of the proposed building that would provide coverage. Eric Hagen asked if this parcel is guided commercial/residential flex for land use. Mr. Grittman confirmed and added that when this was originally approved it was guided commercial. Alison Zimpfer asked about the applicants looking for flexibility on the roofing and if staff okay with said request. Mr. Grittman responded that original recommendation was for a pitched roof. The flat roof has grown more in contemporary uses for buildings like the one proposed, so it is not a significant request. Mr. Tapper asked how the traffic will be flowing the correct way once this apartment is completed and filled. Mr. Grittman clarified that there will be directional signage at the entrance. Mr. Tapper asked for clarification on the parking supply. Mr. Grittman said that studies are changing from a per unit count for parking needs, to a per bedroom count, and the plans show a 1.1:1 parking to bedroom ratio, which is adequate to meet demand in staff's view. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler asked about the added traffic that will be on School Blvd. because of this project and if staff thought about how that would factor into The Pointes at Cedar Project. Ms. Schumann said that staff is aware of the level of service and operational requirements for School Blvd. The traffic memo provided by the applicant provides the necessary information if improvements were needed. Ms. Gabler asked if this was the architectural plans were finalized. Mr. Grittman confirmed and noted they are very similar to the previous submittal. Mr. Konsor asked when the traffic memo for this project was completed. Ms. Schumann said it was completed with the original submittal in 2019, however the applicant was asked to reverify the information and have since confirmed the memo is still valid. Teri Lehner raised the concern about pedestrian access on the site and from School Blvd. Mr. Grittman pointed out the pedestrian walkway on the site and the connection to the sidewalk on School Blvd. in the site plan. Mr. Konsor opened the public hearing and with no public comment, closed the public hearing portion of this item. Ms. Gabler asked about the requirements in an R-4 district on brick or stone on the exterior of the building and if they met the requirements. Mr. Grittman confirmed. Ms. Gabler asked if a lighting plan for the parking lot was included in the plans. Mr. Grittman said they did not provide one and it would be a condition of approval. Mr. Hagen raised concerns about the project and how the area this project is in has changed since last submitted. Mr. Hagen noted he would rather see this as commercial or a combination, rather than all residential on this property. There could be potential for this residential area taking potential residential area away from The Pointes at Cedar. Mr. Tapper said that this area and The Pointes at Cedar are two separate things servicing different groups of demographics. He indicated that he did not really see this affecting The Pointes at Cedar. Ms. Zimpfer noted that if this property were to be all commercial, it brings the added struggle of trying to find business to fill that property, while there are commercial areas vacant already in Monticello. Mr. Grittman added that if the thought that this project would take residential away from The Pointes at Cedar, the same argument could made about if commercial space were to go on this property. He noted that the City needs additional residential density in the area to support the commercial at The Pointes. ZIMPFER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2021-047, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF REZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM B-4 TO TWIN PINES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED 4-1 WITH HAGEN VOTING AGAINST. ZIMPFER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2021-048, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR TWIN PINES, A 93-UNIT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN SAID RESOLUTION. KONSOR SECONDED, MOTION CARRIED 4-1 WITH HAGEN VOTING AGAINST. ZIMPFER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2021-049, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE TWIN PINES ADDITION, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT Z, KONSOR SECONDED, MOTION CARRIED 4-1 WITH HAGEN VOTING AGAINST. EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Kjellberg/Firm Ground PUD Rezoning, Development Stage PUD, Preliminary Plat Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 6` Addition 1. Site plan additions are made per the staff report (primarily signage and sign monumentation) to reinforce the entry and circulation to the residential area. 2. The Preliminary and Final Plat are found consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, including verification that all easements and association maintenance aspects of the mixed -use Outlot A area are addressed. 3. The Preliminary and Final plat shall include all easements, including perimeter easements per the direction of the City Engineer. 4. The applicant is required to supply a cross -parking agreement with the adjacent office building over Outlot A. Submittal of association and/or common area easement documents is required. The documents shall be subject to the review and comment of the City Attorney. 5. Each of the underground parking spaces are included in the rent set for specific units. 6. The property owner submit the required petition for vacation of drainage and utility easements over Outlot A, to be re-established on the plat per the City Engineer's direction. 7. The approved PUD provides attached or internal trash handling, rather than the detached trash enclosure area per a revised building plan and narrative. 8. The landscaping plan is revised consistent with any changes to the site plan to maintain plant quantities and buffering. 9. The circulation routes through the project are reviewed to ensure safe travel for residents and commercial tenants in all areas of the project site, including directional signage related to discouraging traffic through the veterinary office building to the west. 10. The grading and drainage plans are revised to preserve usable patio and green space in the south courtyard, rather than being sloped or utilized for stormwater retention. 11. The site plan is revised to comply with the comments of the fire department staff for code compliance, circulation and public safety aspects. 12. The applicant prepare and submit signage plans that incorporate existing signage, provide for consolidated entrance monument signage and avoid additional freestanding sign displays. 13. The applicant prepare and submit lighting plans, including attention to existing commercial site lighting that acknowledges the change in use and residential needs of the property. 14. The applicant provides amended plans consistent with the requirements of the City Engineer's letter, dated December 2nd, 2021. 15. The applicant enters into a PUD and Plat development agreement at the time of final plat. 16. The applicant complies with additional conditions as recommended by other City staff and Planning Commission. Commissioner Zimpfer left the meeting at 7:35, leaving 4 eligible voters to complete the agenda. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of Adopting Resolution PC-2021-050, a Resolution Finding that the Proposed Acquisition of Certain Land by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority is Consistent with the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan) Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview of the item to the Planning Commission and the public. Schumann noted that this purchase of the land will be carried out by the Monticello EDA. The intent of the block following the purchase and redevelopment would be a commercial and residential mixed use. TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2021-050, FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LAND BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN). LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. B. Consideration of PC-2021-051. a Resolution Findine that the Proaosed Acquisition of Certain Land (Parcels 213-100-151400 and 213-100-153100) by the City of Monticello is Consistent with the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan) Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. This acquisition is intended to provide for a new public works facility and to provide better service to municipal utilities as Monticello continues to grow. Staff supported this agenda item as it is consistent with the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Konsor asked why this location and this size of property specifically for a public works facility. Ms. Schumann said that public works has done studies on the capability of servicing Monticello and in the future as Monticello continues to grow, this area will be best to serve future parts of Monticello. Mr. Tapper asked if the land would have to be annexed as it is not currently in the City of Monticello. Ms. Schumann confirmed. KONSOR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2021-051, FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LAND BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN). LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. C. Consideration of recommending appointments for expiring terms of Planning Commissioners Paul Konsor and Andrew Tapper Ms. Schumann noted that at the end of the year, Commissioners Paul Konsor and Andrew Tapper have terms expiring. In order to be reappointed for another term, a nomination for both will be needed in order for City Council to move forward with nominations on December 13, 2021. HAGEN MOVED TO NOMINATE COMMISSIONER PAUL KONSOR FOR A THREE- YEAR TERM TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2022. LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0 WITH WINIrAC 00340MV-1 :1rauu►1e1 HAGEN MOVED TO NOMINATE COMMISSIONER ANDREW TAPPER FOR A THREE- YEAR TERM TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2022. KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0 WITH ANDREW TAPPER ABSTAINING. D. Consideration to appoint a Plannine Commission member to The Pointes at Cedar Compass Committee Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. The Compass Committee was formed to provide broad feedback to City and WSB as The Pointes at Cedar projects begin. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO APPOINT ALISON ZIMPFER TO THE POINTES AT CEDAR COMPASS COMMITTEE AND HAVE ANDREW TAPPER ACT AS AN ALTERNATE. ERIC HAGEN SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. E. Consideration of the Community Development Director's Report Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided the Director's Report to the Planning Commission and the public. The Monticello Lakes project has been approved for Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat by the City Council. The applicants have since provided and application for Final Stage PUD and Final Plat along with revised plans. The majority of the conditions of approval have been met. Ms. Schumann also described the yearly work plan for the Planning Commissioners as 2021 is ending. 4. Added Items A. Monticello Lakes Staff Update It was understood that Ms. Schumann provided an update on this item in the Community Development Director's Report (Item 3E). 5. Adjournment ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE DECEMBER 7, 2021, REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. ERIC HAGEN SECONDED THE MOTION, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. Planning Commission Agenda - 01/04/2022 2A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for Cross Access and Preliminary and Final Plat of Deephaven 3rd Addition in the B-4 Regional Business District. Applicant: Deephaven Development, LLC Prepared by: Northwest Associated Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Consultants (NAC) Commission action): 1/04/2022 1/24/2022 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Project Engineer ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat for Deephaven3, creating four buildable parcels for development. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2022-001 recommending approval of a Preliminary Plat of Deephaven 3, based on findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC 2022-001 recommending denial of a Preliminary Plat of Deephaven 3, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. 2022-001 Decision 2: Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for Cross Access for Deephaven Third Addition 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2022-002 recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Cross Access for Deephaven 3, based on findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC 2022-002 recommending denial of a Conditional Use Permit for Cross Access for Deephaven 3, based on findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. 2022-002 Planning Commission Agenda - 01/04/2022 REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description (current): Outlot A, Deephaven 2 PID: 155-258-000020 Planning Case Number: 2021-045 Request(s): The applicants seek to subdivide the subject property into four buildable parcels for future commercial development. Deadline for Decision: February 6, 2022 (60-day deadline) April 7, 2022 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: Commercial and Residential Flex Zoning Designation: B-4, Regional Business District The purpose of the "B-4" Regional Business District is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District Current Site Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial (Super 8 and Best Western) East: Commercial (Pro Tech Restoration) South: Commercial and Multi -Family Residential West: Commercial Retail Project Description: The applicants seek to subdivide the subject 6.97-acre property into four commercial lots ranging in size from 2.2 to 2.4 acres. Future commercial uses on the platted lots will be limited to those permitted in the applicable B-4 Zoning District. Those requiring a conditional use permit will require additional application and review. 2 Planning Commission Agenda - 01/04/2022 The applicants also seek a conditional use permit to approve a shared access configuration proposed between Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1 of the plat, and Lot 4 of this plat and Lot 1, Block 1 of the original Deephaven Plat. ANALYSIS: Access. The subject site is bordered on the north, east and west by public roadways. As shown on the Preliminary Plat and Access exhibit, access to Lot 1 will be provided via two existing access points along Cedar Street, one of which is shared with Lots 2 and 3 to the north. The Preliminary Plat and Access exhibit illustrates a centrally located curb cut along Chelsea Road (to access Lot 3) and a shared access along Edmonson Avenue (to access Lot 4). While the proposed access locations appear well -planned, it is unclear if a shared access easement exists or is planned along Edmonson Avenue. As a condition of Preliminary/Final Plat and Conditional Use Permit approval, a shared access easement should be created which corresponds to the proposed shared driveway access. Lot access issues should be subject to further comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Lot Sizes. In the B-4 zoning district, lots have no minimum width or square footage standards. Instead, lots are allowed to be created that meet the specific needs of the proposed user, providing adequate support facilities can be provided, such as parking, green and pedestrian spaces, and other ancillary improvements. Development on lots is also limited by the required drainage and utility easements, which are required along the perimeter and as required by the City Engineer. Proposed lots within the subdivision range from 1.4 to 2.23 acres in size and appear to have ample width and depth to accommodate future commercial development and applicable B-4 District setback requirements. Parks / Open Space. The subject property lies within the boundaries of the Chelsea Commons Small Area Plan. One of the objectives of the Area Plan is the creation of a "gateway plaza" in the southeast corner of the Cedar Street/Chelsea Road intersection (see conceptual illustration below). A 50 foot by 50 foot outlot was reserved from the original plat for this purpose. Planning Commission Agenda - 01/04/2022 Gateway Plaza Appropriately, the Preliminary/Final Plat illustrates =the 2,500 square foot outlot (Outlot A of Deephaven) in this location which is intended to accommodate the future creation of the plaza. The plaza design itself is a component of the landscape architecture design work for the public portions of the Pointes at Cedar area, currently proceeding on a separate track. Pedestrian connections to the plaza area will be addressed in detail as part of future site and building plan review procedures. To this end, pedestrian easements will be required to connect the corner plaza and the public and residential portions of the Deephaven area. Shared Access Easements._ Appropriately, the proposed subdivision anticipates a shared access arrangement between lots as a 50-foot wide, ingress and egress easement overlays portions of Lots 1, 2 and 3 as well the abutting lot to the south. The applicant previously recorded a cross access agreement for this drive with the plat of Deephaven. The applicant should verify that the easement is still accurate as drafted, or in the alternative, correct the legal descriptions and record the amendment. As previously indicated, a shared access configuration is also proposed between Lot 4, Block 1 of Deephaven 3rd Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, Deephaven. it is unclear if a shared access easement presently exists along Edmonson Avenue. Based on the site plan provided with the Deephaven multi -family project, it is also unclear how the proposed shared access impacts the prior proposed sidewalk for the multi -family project in this area. Grading, Drainage and Utility Easements. As shown on the Preliminary/Final Plat drawing, a 20-foot-wide drainage easement intersects proposed Lot 3, Block 3 and ultimately connects to a storm pond located within the abutting parcel to the south. As a condition of Preliminary/Final Plat approval, all proposed easements should be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Grading plans for each lot will be reviewed at the time of development for each lot. 4 Planning Commission Agenda - 01/04/2022 STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Based on the preceding review, City Staff recommends approval of the Deephaven 3 Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for shared access, as proposed by the applicant, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2022-001, Preliminary Plat B. Resolution 2022-002, Conditional Use Permit for Shared Access C. Aerial Image D. Applicant Narrative E. Existing Conditions F. Preliminary Plat G. Final Plat H. Access Points I. Site Plan, Deephaven Multi -Family J. Comments from Engineering Department Z. Conditions of Approval 5 Planning Commission Agenda - 01/04/2022 EXHIBIT Z Preliminary Plat of Deephaven 3 and Conditional Use Permit for Shared Access 1. Evidence (or updated easement language) is provided for the required shared access easement corresponding to the proposed shared driveway access along Cedar and along Edmonson Avenue. 2. Easement provisions are made for the required pedestrian connections from the plaza outlot to the public and residential areas as required by the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. 3. Lot access issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 4. All proposed easements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. Considerations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2022-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DEEPHAVEN 3" ADDITION WHEREAS, Buchholz Construction has requested platting of a 4-lot commercial property project to be known as Deephaven Third Addition; and WHEREAS, the site has previously been platted as Outlot A of Deephaven 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, the plat is subject to a Conditional Use Permit for cross parking and access, sharing parking and access facilities with Deephaven and Deephaven 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, the platted lots will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, including the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the plat pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 4, 2022 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B-4, Regional Business District, as well as the PUD District affecting the residential areas in the project. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed shared access and parking arrangements meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, and are consistent with the applicable land use policies and ordinances. 5. The proposed plat is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding commercial properties, and instead is expected to encourage future commercial development on the lots of Deephaven 3rd Addition. 6. Approval of the plat will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the proposed Preliminary Plat for Deephaven 3rd Addition be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. Evidence (or updated easement language) is provided for the required shared access easement corresponding to the proposed shared driveway access along Cedar and along Edmonson Avenue. 2. Easement provisions are made for the required pedestrian connections from the plaza outlot to the public and residential areas as required by the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. 3. Lot access issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 4. All proposed easements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. Considerations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 4th day of January, 2022 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Paul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2022-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROSS ACCESS AND SHARED PARKING FOR LOTS IN DEEPHAVEN, DEEPHAVEN 2ND ADDITION, AND DEEPHAVEN 3" ADDITION WHEREAS, Buchholtz Construction has requested platting of a commercial property, with a Conditional Use Permit to allow cross access between Deephaven (a residential project), Deephaven Second Addition (a commercial project), and Deephaven Third Addition (4 commercial lots), and cross parking between the commercial parcels; and WHEREAS, the site has adequate areas for parking to accommodate both existing and anticipated parking demand; and WHEREAS, the cross access between the subject property is required to facilitate internal vehicle circulation for businesses in the area without traffic demand on the public streets; and WHEREAS, the cross parking facilitates joint and shared parking uses between the commercial portions of the development area; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for Condition Use Permit pursuant to the regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 4, 2022 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B-4, Regional Business District, as well as the PUD District affecting the residential areas in the project. 2. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed shared access meets the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, pursuant to the conditions attached to the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The proposed cross access is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding commercial properties, and instead may encourage future commercial development in the lots of Deephaven 3rd Addition. 6. Approval of the CUP for cross access will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. 7. Parking will be adequate based on the available and future off-street parking on the property, and enhanced by the shared parking allowances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the proposed Conditional Use Permit be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. Evidence (or updated easement language) is provided for the required shared access easement corresponding to the proposed shared driveway access along Cedar and along Edmonson Avenue. 2. Easement provisions are made for the required pedestrian connections from the plaza outlot to the public and residential areas as required by the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. 3. Lot access issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 4. All proposed easements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. Considerations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 0' day of January, 2022 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Paul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Request for Conditional Use Permit for Cross Access, Preliminary Plat and final Plat Created by: City of Monticello Outlot B, Deephaven 1155265000010 Project Narrative: This project is the third phase in the Deephaven development. It currently consists of a 6.97 acre outlot that was created in the plat of Deephaven 2. This outlot is surrounded by public roadways along the west, north, and east boundaries of the property. The south boundary adjoins an existing commercial lot and a +/- 165 unit multifamily residential housing development. This phase of the Deephaven development will consist of the creation of 4 new lots ranging in area from 1.4 acres to 2.2 acres. Each lot will serve as a new commercial site. Access to these lots will be via one of the proposed access points along the adjacent public roadways that are depicted in the plans for this project or via the existing shared access drive that connects to Cedar Street on the west side of the development. Stormwater lines, sanitary sewer lines and watermain line serving these lots have been installed during the last two phases of this development. Since the exact used for each lot is not known at this time an individual detailed grading, drainage, and utility plan set will be prepared to meet the proposed uses for each lot as they are sold. MAPPING LEGEND STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT WATER VALVE LIGHT POLE UTILITY POLE UTILITY PEDESTAL UTILITY METER TREE BURIED ELECTRIC LINE BURIED TELEPHONE LINE BURIED GAS LINE OVERHEAD POWER LINE WATER LINE STORM SEWER PIPE SANITARY SEWER PIPE CONIC. CURB 8t GUTTER PROPERTY LINE SURVEYED MAJOR CONTOUR SURVEYED MINOR CONTOUR COUNTY LIDAR CONTOUR CONCRETE BITUMINOUS T-BUR - _G_G -OHP—OHP —960 RIM-- 960.85— -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RIM= 960.84 NV W= 9�3.84 NV E= 953.94 ID C '0 I C 19/"/ A 5 I / // RIM= 961.76 66 NV W= 954.66 :NV E= 954.76 Benc ark I sr THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITitASiMENTS TO BE DEDICATED AS PART OF THIS PLAT ARE SHOWN AS THUS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: REAR LOT LINE *, 1 661 SIDE LOT LINE _N — 1 6 6 L ROAD R/W J DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET LEGEND OF PROPERTY BOUNDARY SYMBOLS 0 IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED "DELEO 40341"TO BESET 0 FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 SET MAGNETIC "PIK" NAIL * GOVERNMENT SECTION CORNER MONUMENT Survey Datum is based on INGS Control Station "8605 J" Northing - 216092.167 Easting - 522403.197 Elevation- 959.25 HORIZONTAL DATUM: Wright County Coordinates (NAD83, 2007 Adjustment) VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 960,' �=.roe. --- RIM= 961.12 6f. 4 Air vah 6" Gate v 16- Gate'valve (I 'b RIM= 960.84 - c". RIM= 960.15 962- -North Quarter corner of Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 (Cast Iron Monument) % % C%CK I 4 96, 164.60- 604-:"' V.. % t26 :21 JF � - - - % - X % ti.' 'I 20 foot wide Permanent Easement for drainage and utility purposes per Doc. No. 697451 0 FI: -64.07 9. Benchmark 6 North -South Quarter Section Line Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 tw: E-L Z uo CD r- 96& - - - - - - 1 968- Is I 'k ou Drainage y and Utility Easement per DE PHAVEN J 7 Access Drive 964 49.07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - —0HP 0HP_0HP_0HP 0HP-�-0HP—ONP-0HP 0H,_=(�7.HF1--P---1—O"_"P_ '7 N 89'00'49" E 1003.40 .... r N89-00-47-E (CEDAR STREET ADDITION) RIM= 963.43 :Z INV= 950.7ii Cultivated field I I I I I FFE = 967.9,/ Z cutt 1. _N PROJECT BENCHMARKS B.M. # Elev. Description Location 1 965.15 Top Nut of Hydrant 760'So. of Chelsea Rd & Cedar St, East side of Cedar St 2 963.22 Top Nut of Hydrant 350'So. of Chelsea Rd & Cedar St, East side of Cedar St 3 964.14 Top Nut of Hydrant NE Quadrant of Chelsea Rd & Cedar St 4 962.17 Top Nut of Hydrant 300' East of Cedar St & Chelsea Rd &, South side of Chelsea Rd 5 964.01 Top Nut of Hydrant 2 O'West of Edmonson Ave NE & Chelsea Rd &, South side of Chelsea Rd 6 967.33 Top Nut of Hydrant 300'South of Chelsea Rd & Edmonson Ave NE, East side of Edmonson Ave NE Note: All elevations listed were cletermied via GPS/RTK methods and are based on the datum of NAVD 88 Area Tabulation Parcel Sq. Ft. Acres Lot 1 72,291 1.660 Lot 2 74,052 1.700 Lot 3 96,404 2.213 1 Lot 4 60,984 1.400 Total 303,731 6.973 / I ;q: $_ E Shop -964, en FFE964.8 FFE = 963.5 FFE = 964.3 ------------------------------------ - - 964 --------- Ab 962, South Quarter corner of Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 (Cast Iron Monument) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Outtot A, DEEPHAVEN 2, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. SURVEYOR'S NOTES: The utilities shown hereon represent those identified during the field survey operations and the record drawings provided by the utility owner for this project, if any. Utilities were physically marked via Gopher State One Call. Ticket Number 192685020. Kramer Leas DeLeo, P.C. makes no warranties as to the locations, depths, or types of any utilities within the area shown hereon. User(s) of this map, survey, or plan are responsible for locating all utilities prior to any excavation, tunneling, drilling, or driving of objects into the ground. This survey was performed in conjunction with First American Title Company's Commitment for Title Insurance dated 04-02-2018 as provided by the client. Owner of Record: Deephaven Development, LLC Et Valley View Townhomes, LLP c/o Mark Buchholz 4379 33rd Avenue South, Suite 121, Fargo, ND 58104 (701) 371-1646 mdbuchhoLz@gmaiL.com Developer Date Buchholz Construction (Mark Buchholz) 4379 33rd Avenue South, Suite 121, Fargo, ND 58104 (701) 371-1646 mdbuchhoLz@gmaiL.com THE NORTH -SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SEC. 14, TWR 121, RNG. 25 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 00^00' 32" WEST 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET Vicinity Map 0 Project Location Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 SCHOOL BLVD Z 2: NO SCALE SEC 14, TW 121, RNG 25 ---------- LU O LU LU M U) _J Z LU 0 9 W U) Z 0 U) 5: LU Of ci Z Z 2 O� co 04 0 5; c:) EL X 0 X C4 (D LU W Lu a. >- 1'- 0 0 U) =1 >LU o F- X 0 C14 >: D U) LU U) LU > WLLI < =) W Z Z cl) >. _J 0 -2 a LL Z 0 LU IX LU _J LU LU < IL 0 Q� Z Lo Z W 0 LU LU 0 W 1: LLI >. 2 _J LL F_ 0 Z LL M LU LU < _J - LU EL I._ 1: LU < (D LU (L E 73 LU IX :3 Lu U) M 0 r- E M Z Z .2) ca N D W W CD co 0 Z 1i L Z Z 10 I LU 0 Lo C3• 0 C, C\1 Z 0 U) Lu co 0 W z Z Z W LU Z _< LI.J LU Z C) >_ Lu co I&C Z LLI > 4-J tt In 04-J kn Ln N on LLJ 4- 0 LLJ Vi 0 'Z; 4-J U (a 4-J o 4_5 L_ :3 C:) Ln 0 4 4-J X- - C:) 4-J Z .r- -0 CD = 'r.- 0 on rq 0 Ln 0 Zo U C'4 0 CA r— on 2 0 0 0 Lu 0 U E Q) 0 -0 0 E U 0 r� _J MAPPING LEGEND STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT WATER VALVE LIGHT POLE UTILITY POLE UTILITY PEDESTAL UTILITY METER TREE BURIED ELECTRIC LINE BURIED TELEPHONE LINE BURIED GAS LINE OVERHEAD POWER LINE WATER LINE STORM SEWER PIPE SANITARY SEWER PIPE CONIC. CURB 8t GUTTER PROPERTY LINE SURVEYED MAJOR CONTOUR SURVEYED MINOR CONTOUR COUNTY LIDAR CONTOUR CONCRETE BITUMINOUS T-BUR — _G_G -OHP—OHP —960 RIM-- 960.85— - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RIM= 960.84 NV W= 9�3.84 NV E= 953.94 ID cl, 46 .3 C J 5 I / // FRIM= 961.76 66 :NV W= 914.66 B.c ark I V E= 954.76 THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITitASiMENTS TO BE DEDICATED AS PART OF THIS PLAT ARE SHOWN AS THUS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: REAR LOT LINE *, 1 661 SIDE LOT LINE 1 66 L ROAD R/W J DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET LEGEND OF PROPERTY BOUNDARY SYMBOLS 0 IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED "DELEO 40341"TO BESET 0 FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 SET MAGNETIC "PIK" NAIL * GOVERNMENT SECTION CORNER MONUMENT Survey Datum is based on INGS Control Station "8605 J" Northing - 216092.167 Easting - 522403.197 Elevation- 959.25 HORIZONTAL DATUM: Wright County Coordinates (NAD83, 2007 Adjustment) VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 960,' �=.roe. --- RIM= 961.12 44 6 � 6"Airvah Gat v 16" Gate .' valve (I 'b RIM= 960.84 - _01" RIM= 960.15 962- -North Quarter corner of Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 (Cast Iron Monument) % C%CK I 4 96, 164.60- 6).94,: Vt. t.26 M'tw WA 1JF 964 ..X % ti.' 'I 20 foot wide Permanent Easement for drainage and utility purposes per Doc. No. 697451 0 FI: -64.07 9. Benchmark 6 North -South Quarter Section Line Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 tw: U0 . . ........... I J� I' - e-1 I . ................ . . . 0 r- ......... EL Z 11 -06, CD U" Is I 50 33 and Utility ment per DEEPHAVEN-- ". Drainage 7 Access Drive 49.07 % 964 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _0HP_0HP-0HP _0HP OHP oll-��.Hl .17 N 89'00'49" E 1003.40 .... RIM= 963.4A Z N89-00-47-E (CEDAR STREET ADDITION) INV= 950.78 Cultivated field I I I I I FFE = 967.9,/ Z CuttivaLw I I— PROJECT BENCHMARKS B.M. # Elev. Description Location 1 965.15 Top Nut of Hydrant 760'So. of Chelsea Rd & Cedar St, East side of Cedar St 2 963.22 Top Nut of Hydrant 350'So. of Chelsea Rd & Cedar St, East side of Cedar St 3 964.14 Top Nut of Hydrant NE Quadrant of Chelsea Rd & Cedar St 4 962.17 Top Nut of Hydrant 300' East of Cedar St & Chelsea Rd &, South side of Chelsea Rd s 1 964.01 ITop Nut of Hydrant 270' West of Edmonson Ave NE & Chelsea Rd &, South side of Chelsea Rd 6 1 967.33 ITop Nut of Hydrant 300'South of Chelsea Rd & Edmonson Ave NE, East side of Edmonson Ave NE Note: All elevations listed were cletermied via GPS/RTK methods and are based on the datum of NAVD 88 Area Tabulation Parcel Sq. Ft. Acres Lot 1 72,291 1.660 Lot 2 74,052 1.700 Lot 3 96,404 2.213 1 Lot 4 60,984 1.400 Total 303,731 6.973 Shop -964, en FFE = 964.8 FFE = 963.5 FFE = 964.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 964 --------- Ab 962, South Quarter corner of Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 (Cast Iron Monument) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Outtot A, DEEPHAVEN 2, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. SURVEYOR'S NOTES: The utilities shown hereon represent those identified during the field survey operations and the record drawings provided by the utility owner for this project, if any. Utilities were physically marked via Gopher State One Call. Ticket Number 192685020. Kramer Leas DeLeo, P.C. makes no warranties as to the locations, depths, or types of any utilities within the area shown hereon. User(s) of this map, survey, or plan are responsible for locating all utilities prior to any excavation, tunneling, drilling, or driving of objects into the ground. This survey was performed in conjunction with First American Title Company's Commitment for Title Insurance dated 04-02-2018 as provided by the client. Owner of Record: Deephaven Development, LLC Et Valley View Townhomes, LLP c/o Mark Buchholz 4379 33rd Avenue South, Suite 121, Fargo, ND 58104 (701) 371-1646 mdbuchhoLz@gmaiL.com Developer Date Buchholz Construction (Mark Buchholz) 4379 33rd Avenue South, Suite 121, Fargo, ND 58104 (701) 371-1646 mdbuchhoLz@gmaiL.com THE NORTH -SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SEC. 14, TWR 121, RNG. 25 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 00^00' 32" WEST 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET Vicinity Map 0 =n XCHELSEARD LUNDAR� Z Z 0 Z 0 SCHOOL BLVD Z 2: NO SCALE SEC 14, TW 121, RNG 25 Lu O Lu Lu M U) _J Lu 0 K W U) Z 0 U) 5: W O Z 1- 2 04 T_ 0 — O� CO c:) EL > 4) Lu X C14 -_ Lu 0 LU o > F-- n C14 W W U) LLI LLI > a < Z Z cl) >. _J 0 -cl LL Z2 0 LU 0 IX W_J W Lu IL 0 Z :) Z W 0 W W 0 W M Lu >. 1-- LL F_ 0 Z LL W W < _J _J Lu EL I._ 1: W < W (L E 7a-) IX Lu = Lu U) 0 cc r- E Z Z cc C�4 U) C) Ir" r14 co 0 Z Lu Z Z 10 LU CL 93 0 Lo 0 V) C'4 Z 0 0 LU Z Z Z LU LU LU Z I _< LLI LU CD X Z 0 Lu co gild Z LLI > 4-J tt In 04-J kn C14 on LLI V) 4- 0 LLI'Z; C C) 0 a) 4 -1 U (a 4-J *4mj 4-J _ :3 L_ Ln 0 6 • r— 4-J In C:) 4-J Z CD = 'r.- C) on rq 0 C) U� �:: 0.0 0 %0 4-- :E C4 0 kn 4—J ma U Ln 4-0 3:3 co :3 0 4) 0 O0 L: 0 ILL. L) U MLn 4-- -0 0 (L) 4-J (a EV U 0 _J DEEPHAVEN 3 av, 3 ---------- '3! OC R-46;8%81C&!B� L�22�� 7 CH� � 82 - 02 27_ W 222 11 so/ /r \ J /, 3":t 24 Apple. 46M 964.,o 2 1.700 Acres A / 9. ^ LOT I C! 41 A 2 T --- — --- — --- — --- — --- — --- Future S88*4724'W 643.05 - - - - - - - - - - LLMBEL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t-o, 23.59 Appx. Location of ICI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Building I. II Min. FFE = 964.00 Apits. Location of Future Building 3 4 I 13 Min. FFE 966.00 13 1 1.400 Acres 2.213 Acres BLOCK 1 ... ............ . % 2 5.81 '_16 T] 1 42.0.47 - - - - - - L '16&PE 135*59 . . . . J L - - - - - 4 -4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -North Quarter comer of Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 (Cast Iron Monument) A: 1" F�ARK C K 1 0 z :y X Cs� OL, ioD z P;rlgn—' No. n— BLOCK ONE o Future Entrance 0— N 88'49 21" E 831.87 9ate• Not Tangent %a. — Una oc - - -- - -- - -- - - I arB. IS 9?1ft Sec. 14, Vp. 121, 7 ry j �/ :... �z IC 33 eel C K E Av g - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — t En istinronce 1.660 Acres F — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — j 4 /?• 4 .... _.4 . IN 89 W 49" E 266.20 33 XK BL_CK LOIo X* n; -14 Tii Q, 81 Z I --------------------------------- r ------- ---------------------- ------------- * ------------------------ ------------------------ j - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N 89'OY 49r E 1003.40 z N 89-0947- E (CEDAR STREETADDITION) NOT P�'ITCD z NU PLKITED CE.D. R '-ST: Vicinity Map 01,1711a. A THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS TO =n BE DEDICATED AS PART OFTHIS PLATARE SHOWN AS THUS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: REAR LOT LINE DUN LEGEND OF PROPEffrY BOUNDARY SYMBOLS 17; ------------ 7 0 IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED 'DELE040341"TO BE SET 00— ,I 0 FOUND IRON MONUMENT SIDE ri LOT South Quarter comer of 2. No -E GOVERNMENT SECTION CORNER MONUMENT 0 60 120 LINE Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 THE NORTH -SOUTH QUARTER — (Cast Iron Monument) - SEC 14,11121,RNG21 SECTION LINE OF RT KL— SEC. 14. TWP. 121, RING. 25 Note: KRAMER LEAS IDELEO The Underlying property defined by this plat of DEEPHAVEN 2 is subject to a blanket ASSUMED TO BEAR SCALE IN FEET nket NORTH 00-00- 32' WEST ROAD arM is URVEYIN a • E Nal NENING - PLANNING temporaryeasement for public pathway or trail. P,rpoaft per document number 1432430. a RAINE R . T. CLOUD 1 INCH = 60 FEET DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEE, Sheet No. 2 of 2 Sheets N WARNERT RETAIL SECOND ADDITION RIM= 959.93 LOT 2 INV W- 955.6\ INV S= 955.73 / RIM= 959.89 / NV 956.09 Easterly line of Cedar Street f/k/a / Old State Highway No. 25 / / / RIM- 960 88 INV= 947.8 SHELF- 948. I ss OMMERCIAL PLAZA 25 ST MIT #3 (48") W/ INLET CASTING AND GRATE / RIM 962.00 INV S 957.75 (15" HDPE) INV NE 957.75 (21" HDPE) LOT 4 / o / / / S / C-) / / L CIC NUMBER 25... CHELSEA COMMONS... LOT 4 \ \ BLOCK 1 \ COMMERCIAL COURT I R&M g60940. 84 / INV- 947. SHELF=947. / / BM 2/� LOT 5 RIM=R1h7 P1 NV- 946.'� SHELF= 947.A BLOCK 1 LLJ LOT 4 BIL0 K 1 o LOT 2 LOT 3 \ \ I Q S L-V E F O X �/ I 0 BM-3 \ RIM- 960.15 / \, PAF INV N= 956.15 V INV S 955.75 \ c� INV E= 950.20 Permanent Easement for street, South line of the North 586.37 feet of the N1/2 NW1/4 \ 0 INV W 950.15 utility�,, and drainagqe purp es per "hoc. No. 845h54 � I RIM- 959.70 S-88°47' 24" W 837-.9-7 ;s (j INV 955.90 \ 6-1 g (12" RCP) - r✓wll L� UUILUI A FEE 963.5 FFE 964.8 INV W 961.08 (15" RCP) INV S 961.08 (15" RCP) I y ST MIT (48") W/ INLET CASTING AND 966.30 IRIM INV N 961.41 (15' R � � I I J I � I I � II FUTURE DRIVEWAY F 1PVC INLET RIM 964.30 INV N 960.30 (12" HDPE) INV S 960.30 (12" HDPE) PVC INLET RIM 964.30 INV N 959.93 (12" HDPE; INV S 959.93 (12" HDPE) PVC INLET RIM 964.30 INV N 959.56 (12" HI INV S 959.56 (12" HI FIRE HYDRANT {- E.C. ELEV 96z W E S 0 25 50 100 SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET MBN ENGINEERING MECHANICAL * ELECTRICAL * CIVIL 503 7TH ST. N, SUITE 200 FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.478.6336 FAX: 701.478.6340 BUCHHOLZ PROPERTIES DEEPHAVEN I MONTICELL03 MINNESOTA Gp� FOQ' MBN JOB #: 19-200 DATE: 12-16-21 FA 3 0 5 0 7; Ci im PROPERTY INFORMATION MONTICELLO APARTMENTS - MONTICELLO, MN OWNER - BUCHHOLZ CONSTRUCTION SITE DATA ZONING TOTAL LOT AREA APARTMENTS LOT AREA TOTAL UNITS OCCUPANCY DENSITY = R-4 = 16.36 ACRES = 8.49 ACRES = 165 = R-2 = 19 UNITS / ACRE ZONING CRITERIA GROSS DENSITY 10-25 DU/ACRE FRONT SETBACK 100, CORNER SIDE SETBACK 40' INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK 30' REAR SETBACK 40' CLEAR OPEN SPACE SETBACK FROM R.O.W. 60' CLEAR OPEN SPACE FROM PROPERTY LINE 40' COMMON OPEN SPACE PER UNIT 500 SF/DU PARKING REQUIREMENTS 2.25 SPACES/DU MAX UNCOVERED PARKING 1.1 SPACES/DU UNITS PROVIDED C° 1° O� "V " BUILDING #1 18 27 6 51 BUILDING #2 24 33 6 63 BUILDING #3 18 27 6 51 TOTAL 60 87 18 165 SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA 369,998 SF TOTAL BUILDING AREA 69,192 SF TOTAL SIDEWALK AREA 3,598 SF TOTAL DRIVELANE AREA 82,550 SF TOTAL POND AREA 44,278 SF TOTAL GREEN SPACE AREA 170,680 SF GREEN SPACE PER UNIT (165 UNITS) 1,034 SF/UNIT TOTAL % PERVIOUS AREA 46% PARKING 14 SUMMARYCO CO °oo� °oo� BUILDING 1 (51 UNIT) 3 79 53 2 137 BUILDING 2 (63 UNIT) 3 60 63 2 128 BUILDING 3 (51 UNIT) 3 45 53 2 103 TOTAL 9 184 169 6 368 IV ' 1 SITE PLAN I I A001 SCALE:1 "=50'-0" I r- I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RHET ARCHITECTURE RHET ARCHITECTURE, LLC 27 11 th ST. S. FARGO, N D 58102 OFFICE PHONE: 701.715.8232 WEB: WWW.RHET-ARCH.COM I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature: �►V ►ASS Date: 04/30/2021 REG. NO.: 50755 PROJECT: MONTICELLO APARTMENT 63 PLEX MONTICELLO, MN GENERAL CONTRACTOR: BUCHHOLZ CONSTRUCTION ATTN: MARK BUCHHOLZ PHONE: 701.371.1646 EMAIL: mdbuchholz@gmail.com CD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 04/30/2021 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE All plans, specifications, computer files, field data, notes and other documents and instruments prepared by RHET ARCHITECTURE, as instruments of service shall remain the property of RHET ARCHITECTURE. RHET ARCHITECTURE shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright thereto. PROJECT N0: 20-100606 DRAWN BY: BH CHECKED BY: RF DRAWING TITLE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN A002 nJ< C I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 5 CITY OF 111o December 17, 2021 Re: Deephaven 3 City Project # 2021-045 OFFICE:763-295-2711 FAX:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street Suite 11 Monticello, MN 55362 The Engineering Department has reviewed the Preliminary Plat and access points drawing dated 12/1/21 as prepared by MBN Engineering, and KLD Surveying and offers the following comments: General Comments 1. Provide 12' drainage and utility easements along rear lot lines. 2. Provide drainage and utility easement for underground stormwater chambers in block 1. 3. Provide updated trail layout for Deephaven 1 and the future driveway along Edmonson. 4. A stormwater maintenance and cross utility agreement will be needed for each lot in Deephaven 3. 5. Provide cross access easements as needed. Will internal cross access easement connect from Cedar to Edmonson? 6. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review prior to any construction. 7. A utility plan shall be provided showing the existing and proposed sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer serving the site at time when building plans are available for each lot. 8. The building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements when building plans are available. 9. Update stormsewer layout on existing condition sheet, the stormsewer shown connecting to Deephaven 2 does not reflect the asbuilt conditions. 10. A more detailed review of the development plans will be completed when the applicant submits complete civil plans and a stormwater management report for each individual site. The City is not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please contact the Engineering Department with any questions. Sincerely, Ryan Melhouse Project Engineer www.ci.monticello.mn.us Planning Commission Agenda — 01/04/22 3113. Community Development Director's Report Council Action on/related to Commission Recommendations Consideration to approve an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for a Retail Building Expansion in the Central Community District (CCD) Applicant: JR & R II LLC Approved on the consent agenda on December 13th, 2021. Consideration to approve a Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat of Twin Pines Apartments, a 93-unit multi -family residential project in a B-4 (Regional Business) District Applicant: Kjellberg, Kent Approved on regular agenda on December 13th, 2021. Monticello Lakes Update On December 131h, 2021 the City Council approved a request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, Final Stage Planned Unit Development, Final Plat, and Development Agreement for Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition for Monticello Lakes, a proposed 200-unit multi -family residential project in a B-4 (Regional Business) District. Planning Commission Appointments City Council approved the appointments of Commissioners Konsor and Tapper for new three-year terms on the Commission on December 13th, 2021. Planning Commission Workplan Update - 2022 A draft update to the 2021-2025 Planning Commission Workplan has been prepared for Planning Commission review and comment. As noted previously, the Planning Commission's Workplan was drafted in 2021 following the adoption of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The Workplan uses the Monticello 2040 Plan as its foundation. The Workplan spans a 5-year period between 2021 and 2025, recognizing that many of the workplan items are on -going efforts or require multi- year focus. The workplan provides important direction on projects, training, and information necessary to support the Commission's role as the City's planning agency. The 2022 Workplan update removes completed items from the 2021 document. The workplan items remaining are those that were incomplete as of the end of 2021 or are those which require on -going effort and attention. Commission's comments on the draft workplan are welcome. A worksheet for comments has been prepared and return is requested by January 14tn For Commission's reference in developing comments or suggestions relating to the workplan, the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan can be found at: https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/274/Monticello-2040 Planning Commission Agenda — 01/04/22 The Pointes at Cedar Project Updates As work continues on various components of The Pointes, staff will prepare a monthly update on planning and board activities related to the project. The summary will be posted to The Pointes project page on the City's website, and provided in monthly board agenda packets. Included is the first such update for the month of December. Council Updates Highlights: https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/Blog.aspx?CID=3 2 CITY OF Monticello Monticello Planning Commission 2021-2025 Workplan 2022 UPDATE - DRAFT The Monticello Planning Commission is established to advise the Mayor, Council and Community Development Department in matters concerning planning and land use matters; to review and make recommendations regarding the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan, subdivision and zoning ordinances and other planning rules and regulations; to establish planning rules and regulations; and to conduct public hearings. Purpose Statement: The Planning Commission will support efforts to implement the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The Planning Commission will work collaboratively with the City Council, other City boards and commissions, and community stakeholders in its work to achieve the Plan and the strategic goals of the city. Organizational & Training Activities: • Continue to support regional planning as identified by the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 1.10.1- Consider the outcomes of regional planning initiatives and participate in processes resulting from the efforts of the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership. • Initiate and/or facilitate organizational projects in support of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 1.1.1 - Facilitate biannual meetings to serve as a "Development Forum" with interested property owners, realtors, builders and developers to discuss long-term planning, real estate market conditions. ■ Strategy 1.1.2 - Develop and publish a 'Development Opportunity Map' for use by the public, property owners and development community that identifies vacant and potential development opportunity sites, as well as pending and approved projects with the City and MOAA. Comprehensive Plan Activities: • Support the implementation of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan through implementation of the Goals, Policies and Strategies identified within the Plan. • Support the priority projects set by the City Council, including the small area planning for Chelsea Commons (now The Pointes at Cedar) area and reinvestment in Block 52 in Downtown Monticello. 11Page Zoning Ordinance/Map Activities: Complete the recodification of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, including consideration of amendments as recommended in the Goals, Policies and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. o Review and revise the zoning ordinance consistent with the 2021-2022 Zoning Ordinance Strategy priorities set by the Planning Commission. • Consider amendments to the Monticello Official Zoning Map in support of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan guided land use, including, but not limited to the following. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 2.7.1 - Amend the Zoning Map to be consistent with the Future Land Use Map and identify areas where mixed -density residential uses are appropriate. Subdivision Ordinance Activities: • Complete a review and amendment of the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance, including consideration of amendments as recommended in the Goals, Policies and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan as follows. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 2.5.1- Implement measures to slow down or "calm" traffic on local streets by using design techniques and measures to improve traffic safety, provide eyes on the street, and enhance the quality of life in Monticello's neighborhoods. Strategy 3.8.2 - Require pedestrian and bike connections in new commercial development. ■ Strategy 6.5.1- Conduct regular review of parkland allocation and ensure sufficient amount of land is designated for parks and recreation activities in the City as the population increases. Research & City Department Update Topics As resources and time allow, the Planning Commission will consider research and information related to the following topic areas. Topic INSERT Status of municipal infrastructure Tree preservation —Zoning ordinance section 4.2 21Page Monticello Planning Commission Workplan Worksheet in Staff have prepared a draft 2021-2025 Planning Commission Workplan, which has been updated in draft form for 2022. To assist in finalizing the 2022 Update to the Planning Commission Workplan, please provide input on the following areas: Comprehensive Plan Please list below any specific Monticello 2040 Goals, Policies or Strategies for which you believe additional focus is required. Zoning Code Sections Please list below any areas within the zoning code for which you would like additional information/study as the city works through recodification in 2022. Other —Training and Information Please list any other areas of focus or training which interest you. Please e mail your responses to Angela Schumann by January 14t", 2022 at angela.schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us. 11Page Project Updates December 29, 2021 Zoning Work Group The Zoning Work Group is charged with supporting development of a zoning ordinance specific to The Pointes at Cedar. Zoning provides the standards for the types of uses and site design that will occur in the project area. The Group held its first meeting on December 1 and provided NAC, the City's planning consultant for the project, with images reflecting places and spaces they liked to visit and spend time in as a baseline for planning. For the Zoning Work Group's next meeting on December 28, they will use those images to identify specific characteristics for building materials, landscaping, signage and design for The Pointes. The guidance will help NAC begin drafting ordinance language for discussion. Compass Committee The Compass Committee is helping create and guide the public spaces at the center of The Pointes. The Compass Committee met for the first time on December 15. After introductions and a presentation by the project team, committee members were led through an imagining exercise to think about what should be included to make the Pointes at Cedar a welcoming place for the entire community. Recurring themes: Diversity of place - Include physical spaces that promote a mix of uses ranging from quiet and contemplative spaces for yoga, meditation and sitting quietly on a bench, to a public stage that allows for local performances of music, theatre, and art. All ages venue - Focus on promoting multi -generational use of this public gathering place in a way that encourages people of different ages to meet and enjoy this place together. Ideas to accomplish this focused on programing and events that bring in a mix of cultures and generations, including a food truck event, an annual pond hockey tournament that includes different ages playing at the same time, outdoor films, and pairing activities together such as coffee and a book club or a "paint and sip" event. Access and opportunity - Important to provide resources and amenities to assure all are welcome and can fully utilize the Pointes at Cedar. The committee will meet next on February 16, 2022. 11Page Board & Commission Updates The City Council approved a request for a 200-unit multi -family residential project known as Monticello Lakes, proposed in the southeast corner of The Pointes at Cedar. Construction of the project is anticipated to begin in early 2022. There was no other formal city board or commission activity on The Pointes for the month of December. General Project Updates (City Staff and consultants) City staff and project consultants WSB (consultant for the Grading, Park & Open Space and Landscaping) and NAC (consultant for The Pointes Small Area Plan and The Pointes Zoning Ordinance) meet each month to work through a variety of planning and design topics related to the next phase of work on The Pointes. The joint meetings allow for communication on the work of the Compass Committee and Zoning Work Group. This month, the staff and consultant team discussed the December 15 Compass Committee meeting, utility relocation coordination, and opportunities for additional public engagement. 2 1 P a g e