Planning Commission Minutes 04-14-1987
.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, April 14, 1987 - 7:30 p.m.
Members Present: Richard Carlson, Jim Ridgeway, Joyce Dowling, Barbara
Koropchak, Richard Martie.
Members Absent: None.
Staff Present: Gary Anderson.
1. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Richard Carlson at
7:30 p.m.
2. Motion by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Barbara Koropchak, to approve
the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1987.
3. A request for a partial subdivision of a residential outlot, Outlot H,
Meadow Oak Addition, to be known as the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition.
Applicant, Dickman Knutson.
.
Mr. Dickman Knutson was present and gave a brief history of the Meadow
Oak Development from its initial concept to what it is today. Meadow
Oak was originally owned by three partners with 40 percent Dickman
Knutson, 30 percent Jim Boyle, and 30 percent Robert Bemboom.
Mr. Knutson bought out the other two partners on the Meadow Oak Second
Addition to be platted Outlot G, Meadow Oak Third Addition to be
platted Meadow Oak Fourth Addition Outlot H, and the Meadow Oak Estates,
and the Meadow Oak Estates Second Addition Outlot C, and Meadow Oak
Estates Third Addition Outlot D around June 1, 1985. In doing so,
Mr. Knutson became the fee title owner to the existing platted subdivisions
and the four remaining outlots. In this process, Mr. Knutson, through
his mortgage holder, Midwest Federal, will assume the financial
responsibility for these two platted subdivisions and the four unplatted
outlots. Mr. Knutson explained his request for the partial subdivision
of Outlot H to be known as the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition. Mr. Knutson
explained that as part of development he has only eight lots remaining
in the Meadow Oak Second Addition, and the Meadow Oak Third Addition
is currently Outlot G and has 13 of the 15 lots sold. Conceivably,
he would like to start with the partial platting of the Outlot H,
to be known as the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition by platting only 14
of the proposed 29 lots total. Mr. Knutson used the rationale for
his request in that as part of the development it would cost only
approximatelY $70,000 to put in the utilities and the hard surfacing
of the street and curb and gutter for these 14 lots in comparison
to approximately $225,000 to put in the entire water and sewer utilities,
curb and gutter, and hard surfaced street into the whole 29 lots
in Outlot H to be known as the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition. with
an already outstanding balance of $750,000 owed to Midwest Federal,
Mr. Knutson would have to go out and borrow additional money to put
in the entire Meadow Oak Fourth Addition. In doing so, the mortgage company
.
-1-
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes - 4/14/87
would look more favorably at lending Mr. Knutson $70,000 than they
would at lending to him the entire $225,000.
Chairperson Richard Carlson opened the meeting for comments from
the public. Ms. Lynn Clark, representing Mr. Jim Boyle as an owner
of Wayzata Realty, was present to explain her standpoint at representing
her client, Mr. Boyle. Ms. Clark indicated they were not in objection
to the proposed 15 lots that Mr. Boyle was presenting, but they were
in objection to not being able to market the adjoining outlot, which
is Outlot I, without any utilities extended to the edge of their
outlot between Outlot I and Outlot H. She eluded to the outstanding
assessments that were put on Outlot I. Those being substantial,
and with the market that we are in, no time would be better than
now to try and market the property if water and sewer utilities were
stubbed in to the property line between Outlot H and Outlot I. Ms. Clark
went on further to explain that the City Attorney, Mr. Gary Pringle,
has had planning development experience in a previous project in
which he was involved. She would like to have the Planning Commission
consider extending services to Outlot H and assess them to Mr. Knutson.
If not, they hoped there could be a possible compromise to this project.
Mr. Knutson would like to show for the record that Ms. Lynn Clark
does not represent his company anymore after tonight's Planning Commission
meeting, as she was also representing Mr. Knutson in a one-time total
land liquidation of all properties owned by Mr. Knutson and Mr. Boyle.
Chairperson Richard Carlson then closed the meeting for comments
from the public and asked for comments from Planning Commission members.
Hearing no comments, he then asked for a motion.
Motion by Richard Martie, seconded by Jim Ridgeway, to approve the
request for a partial subdivision of a residential outlot, Outlot H,
Meadow Oak Addition, to be known as the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition
with the following conditions.
1. That prior to recording of the partial final plat for Outlot H
to be known as the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition, an approved grading/drainage
plan be submitted to the City.
2. Prior to recording of the final plat for part of Outlot H to
be known as Meadow Oak Fourth Addition, an agreement be signed
between the developer and the City that no proposed platted lots
in the remaining part of Outlot H to be known as Outlot A be
sold to any individual until that part of Outlot H to be known
as Outlot A has all utilities installed, curb and gutter installed,
and the recording of this part of Outlot H to be known as Outlot A
with the completion of the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition.
Motion carried unanimously.
4.
A request for open discussion on a proposed concept plan for unplatted
property. Applicant, Jim Boyle.
Ms. Lynn Clark, owner of Wayzata Realty, representing Mr. Jim Boyle,
was present to ask for input from Planning Commission members on
-2-
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes - 4/14/87
the proposed platting of unplatted industrial property just to the east
of Fallon Avenue across the road from the currently existing Oakwood
Industrial Park. Her initial request stemmed from previous conversations
with City staff on proposed platting of portions of approximately
50 acres within this park of unplatted property. She indicated on
her proposed drawing the different types of ways to subdivide parts
of the unplatted property into blocks with separate lots on them.
She indicated she had discussions with our Consulting Planner, John
Uban, in regards to the proposed designs which did show up on the
proposed subdivided site plan layout map. Planning Commission members,
at this early stage, did not approve or deny her proposed platting
of this unplatted property into industrial lots and blocks. The
general consensus of the Planning Commission members present was
that the concept for it was of good planning and further planning
was needed to put it into a preliminary form for them to review at
a later date. Commission members did recognize the merits of good
quality development for this to be done at all. Ms. Clark indicated
that the high priority on her list is to get into a good, sound development
project for part or parts of this unplatted industrial property.
Additional Information Items
1. Conditional use request, Tom Holthaus. Request approved with conditions.
zoning Administrator Anderson indicated to Planning Commission members
there were a couple other conditions which were added as part of
the original six which were recommended from the Planning Commission
members. They were as follows:
1. The developer has to pay the full cost of putting in a right-hand
turn lane.
2. The developer will share on a 50/50 basis with the City are-alignment
of Otter Creek Road from Sandy Lane to West county Road 39 or
West Broadway.
2. Public hearing for annexation of the Monticello Orderly Annexation
Area will be held on April 21, beginning at 1:30 p.m. in the Monticello
Township Hall Chambers.
Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated to Planning Commission members
that there was no further input on this other than when the dates
were and if there is any additional information on this and was of
interest to Planning Commission members, it would be submitted to
them prior to the public hearing date.
3. Motion by Jim Ridgeway, seconded by Joyce DOWling, to set the next
tentative date for the Monticello Planning Commission meeting for
May 12, 1987, 7:30 p.m.
-3-
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes - 4/14/87
4. zoning Administrator Anderson asked Chairperson Richard Carlson if
he could explain a couple other requests which will be forthcoming
and would be submitted just as information. They are as follows:
1. Amending the Monticello City Ordinance to not allow barbecue
grills to be used on balconies of apartment buildings. This
request was brought up to Zoning Administrator Anderson from
Monticello Fire Chief, Willard Farnick, for their information
at the suggestion of Zoning Administrator Anderson for the Planning
commission members just to acknowledge receipt of this, and he
would establish further information on this proposed ordinance
amendment to be presented to them for the next Planning Commission
meeting for their review, May 12, 1987, 7:30 p.m.
2. The other topic brought up was a proposed ordinance amendment
that would require all plumbers in the City of Monticello to
be licensed to do plumbing work. zoning Administrator Anderson
indicated to Planning Commission members that a petition for
this ordinance amendment request is being formulated and will
be before them at the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission
meeting May 12, 1987, 7:30 p.m. The whole intent of it is that
plumbers that are licensed within the City of Monticello are
paying the dues to the State of Minnesota for being licensed.
They are training the people that work for them to become licensed
in the plumbing field, and they would like anyone else that works
with it to do the same.
5. Motion by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Barbara Koropchak, to adjourn
the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
4~~
Gary Anderson
zoning Administrator
-4-