Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 11-22-2021 SpecialAGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Monday, November 22, 2021— 4:00 p.m. Monticello Community Center AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. 4:00 p.m. East Bertram Planning Area Transportation Design (Bridge Room) 3. 5:15 p.m. Discussion on Budget Priorities (Academy Room) 4. Adjournment ALL BERYRAM i C Fa A 1 N IU F .. LAKES, 'sk do No' 4A j AI J—d zi low V I A IFL p W, p 1p o' I or P 311 p ly d fi L 4LLy" ap Ind! 1;4 4pi it PL w WA, R r% ^^^ -EL CAPSTONE H O M E S November 12, 2021 Angela Schumann Community Development Director 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Preliminary Traffic Letter Ms. Schumann, As requested, please accept a preliminary traffic letter of anticipated traffic needs with the development of a new residential neighborhood on the Schluender land in East Bertram study area. Capstone Homes is excited to be working with the City again to design a new neighborhood and begin offering new homes to the residents of Monticello. We look forward to continued conversations with City Staff and the workshop scheduled on November 22 to identify traffic solutions for the extension of School Blvd. Best, Heather Lorch Land Manager Capstone Homes CAPSTONE HOMES, INC. 14015 SUNFISH LAKE BLVD, SUITE 400 1 RAMSEY, MN 55303 0: 763-427-3090 1 F: 763-712-9060 i I CHAPTER 4: MOBIL17YAND CONNECTIVITY 97 INTRODUCTION The Mobility and Connectivity Chapter outlines the goals, policies and transportation strategies to improve mobility and connectivity in Monticello by continuing to build a safe and efficient multimodal transportation system that strengthens the economy and enhances quality of life. This chapter describes how Monticello can increase access to parks, schools, and other community destinations, especially for bicyclists and pedestrians. It also seeks to enhance access to the local and regional transportation system for Monticello's existing and future commercial and industrial development. Multimodal strategies emphasize an integrated pathway system supporting connectivity between activity nodes. The transportation strategy will be implemented together with the land use plan and growth strategy for the continued growth, development and improvement of Monticello. This chapter provides background information to support the land use goals, policies and strategies outlined in the Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation Chapter. The Mobility and Connectivity Chapter utilizes the previous analysis and outcomes of Monticello Transportation Plan approved in January 2011, with an emphasis to update the overall transportation strategy based on the updated land use strategies from this Plan. Intersection of Chelsea Road and Highway 25 PLANNED STREET NETWORK Monticello's growth strategy balances land use development needs with real estate market demand, and transportation and infrastructure improvement require- ments to ensure an orderly and efficient use of land and resources. It recognizes that there is significant development potential within Monticello's existing munic- ipal boundary and even greater potential in the surrounding Orderly Annexation Area (MOAA). Exhibit 4.1 shows the location of future roadways and the potential interchange study area at Orchard Road. It should be noted that while no new river crossings are depicted on the future roadways map, a future crossing is being studied at the regional level and will need to be integrated into the roadway network in future plan updates. As development occurs over time, a system of collector roadways extending into the MOAA will be needed. In particular, the planned street network in the East Bertram Study Area via the extension of School Boulevard will require careful planning. The need for the planned collector roadways should be periodically evaluated as community needs evolve and growth and development occur. The growth strategy prioritizes development and improvement within the existing City boundaries. This includes an emphasis on development in the downtown through infill mixed-use development, streetscape improvements and transportation system management on State Highway 25. Consistent with the City of Monticello's economic development goals, the transportation strategy also includes continued support for an additional Interstate 94 interchange at Orchard Road, which will provide valuable freeway access for future industrial development and continued growth anticipated in the northwest portion of Monticello. The City will work towards a "Complete Streets" approach for future roadway improvements to ensure that the needs of all roadway users are considered during the planning and design process (see "Complete Streets" on page 8). The City will also evaluate the improvement and intersection management of existing and expanded collector roads throughout Monticello. The subsections below discuss transportation considerations that will influence the development of the future roadway network. 98 MOBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY .. FUTURETRANSPORTATION STUDY AREA . . 19 s EXHIBIT 4.1 City of Monticello Boundary Monticello Orderly Annexation Area (MOAA) Monticello Township Boundary Q Parcels Streets - Not Classified a+i+ Railroad Water Bodies Existing Road Classifications Principal Arterial - Interstate Principal Arterial - Other Minor Arterial Major Collector — Minor Collector — Local Future Road Classifications isso Principal Arterial - Interstate loom Principal Arterial - Other Minor Arterial •••• Major Collector ■■■■ Minor Collector .. Local • Future Interchange Future Intersection Note: Future roadway alignments are conceptual and require additional planning and analysis. Future river crossings are being studied by the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 99 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Roadways serve two basic functions: mobility and access. Mobility refers to the ability to travel between places, and access refers to the connection between transportation routes and adjacent land uses. These are competing functions, in that roads designed for one function will often not serve the other effectively. The functional classification system is a hierarchy of roadways based upon the degree to which they provide the mobility versus the access function. The different classifications have different design and operating standards as dictated by their respective functions. A properly designed roadway network has an appropriate mix and integration of the different roadway types, allowing the overall system to operate efficiently and safely. ' The functional classification system organizes a roadway and street network that distributes traffic from local neighborhood streets to collector roadways, then to minor arterials and ultimately the principal arterial system. Roads are placed into categories based on the degree to which they provide access to adjacent land and mobility for through traffic. Functional classification gives an indication of the relative hierarchy of roadways in the transportation network. F14 V, Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation - MnDOT The transportation strategy depicts several planned collector roadways. In general, collectors "collect' traffic from local streets to connect to the arterial roadway network. Exhibit 4.1 illustrates the functional classification of existing and planned roadways in Monticello. This system should be maintained in coordination with MnDOT and Wright County as the planned street network is implemented. ROADWAY JURISDICTION Roadways are classified based on which level of government owns or has jurisdiction over the road. The levels of government which have involvement for roadways within the city are the State of Minnesota (MnDOT), Wright County, the City of Monticello, and Monticello Township. MnDOT maintains the Interstate and Trunk Highway System. Wright County maintains the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) and County Road (CR) systems. The remaining streets (including State Aid streets) located within the city are the responsibility of the City of Monticello. Non -County streets that are on a municipal/township boundary are jointly owned by the City and the Township. These City/Township roads are maintained through agreements between each jurisdiction. Exhibit 4.2 depicts the jurisdictional classification for roadways serving Monticello. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic volumes are monitored and collected to determine roadway utilization and potential capacity issues. Exhibit 4.3 shows existing traffic volumes on major roadways in Monticello as well as 2040 forecast volume ranges as documented in the Wright County Long -Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). In general, capacity is not a concern for most roadways in Monticello. However, the segment of State Highway 25 from School Boulevard north to the river was identified in the Wright County LRTP as exceeding capacity based on 2040 forecast traffic volumes. The Volume to Capacity (v/c) ratio for this segment, or the ratio of traffic volume to roadway capacity, was calculated at 1.28. Roadways with a v/c ratio greater than 1.0 are typically described as exceeding capacity. It should be noted that this analysis is based entirely on traffic volumes and does not account for other roadway characteristics. MnDOT will be a key partner in addressing the safety and mobility issues on State Highway 25 identified during the Comprehensive Plan process. 100 MOBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY RIGHT OF WAY Roadways require different right of way (ROW) widths depending on several factors, including: • Functional Classification • Existing/Forecast Average Daily Traffic (AADT) Volumes • Number of Lanes • Roadway Context (Urban or Rural Section) • Presence of Turn Lanes • Multimodal Facilities • Maintenance/Snow Removal • Drainage/Storm water Management Table 4.1 shows the City of Monticello ROW guidelines for various roadway types. As the Comprehensive Plan is implemented, the City should preserve the appropriate width for future roadway construction/ reconstruction. If sidewalk/trail facilities are included, additional ROW may be required. It is advisable for the City to purchase ROW for future roadways as early as practicable. This helps to limit future high costs and unforeseen purchase issues as on-going development occurs in the areas of the roadways. ACCESS MANAGEMENT AND ROADWAY SPACING In order to function effectively, adequate spacing must be maintained within the network of roadways that make up the functional classification system. While arterials such as Highway 25 and County Highway 75 are generally spaced five to ten miles from other arterials, collector roadways should be spaced roughly one-half mile to one mile apart. Access management should be employed to ensure that access to each planned land use is provided by the appropriate type of roadway and at the appropriate spacing. The proposed extensions of the existing Highway 25 frontage roads are one example of providing connectivity to commercial destinations through a combination of functional classification and access management. Table 4.2 shows City of Monticello access spacing guidelines. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN TABLE4.1: CITY OF MONTICELLO RIGHT-OF-WAY GUIDELINES Functional•g PrincipalType Arterial* Arterial* .. Collector* Collector* Classification AADRequired* No Direct No Direct No Direct Principal Arterial 30,000+ 4 -Lane Divided 150 to 200 ft State Highway 25 Minor Arterial 15,000 - 30,000 4 -Lane Divided 120 to 150 ft School Boulevard Major Collector 7,500- 18,000 4 -Lane Undivided 100 ft 7th Street East 10,000 - 25,000 4 -Lane Divided 120 ft I NA Speed, Traffic Commercial 2,000 - 8,000 2 -Lane 80 ft I Chelsea Road Minor Collector 4,000 -16,000 3 -Lane 80 ft I NA Volume, Sight Volume, Sight Driveways Access 7,500 - 8,000 4 -Lane Undivided 100 ft NA Local 0-9,000 2 -Lane 60 ft River Street *Additional Right -of -Way width should be obtained for the addition of left and/or right turn lanes. TABLE4.2: CITY OF MONTICELLO ACCESS SPACING GUIDELINES of Access PrincipalType Arterial* Arterial* .. Collector* Collector* Residential No Direct No Direct No Direct No Direct As Required Driveways Access Access Access Access Based on: Based on: Based on: Based on: Speed, Traffic Speed, Traffic Speed, Traffic Speed, Traffic Commercial No Direct Volume, Sight Volume, Sight Volume, Sight Volume, Sight Driveways Access Distance, etc. Distance, etc. Distance, etc. Distance, etc. (1/8 to 1/4 mile) (Min. 500 ft) (Min. 200 ft) (Min. 100 ft) Low Volume Residential 1/8 Mile 1/4 Mile 1/8 Mile 1/8 Mile 1/16 Mile Streets High Volume Residential 1/4 Mile 1/4 Mile 1/4 Mile 1/8 Mile 1/16 Mile Streets High Volume Residential 1/2 Mile 1/2 Mile 1/4 Mile 1/4 Mile 1/4 Mile Streets (<1,000 ADT) *Additional Right -of -Way width should be obtained for the addition of left and/or right turn lanes. i I CHAPTER 3: ND USE .. GROWTH AND ORDERLYANNEXATFON 47 GROWTH STRATEGY MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) The Low -Density Residential designation corresponds to the majority of Monticello's single-family residential neighborhoods. These areas are characterized by subdivisions of detached homes, usually on lots from 7,000 to 14,000 square feet. Housing in this designation includes single-family detached residential units as well as detached accessory structures. Other compatible uses, such as schools, nursing homes, private parks and religious facilities may also locate in this designation. Residential • Single -Family • Other Low -Density Residential uses Public/institutional • Schools Recreational • Parks/Playgrounds Open Space • Sensitive Habitat MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 4D � OF gyp 1;n 4* eee6eE Primary Mode Vehicular (slow speeds) Secondary Mode Pedestrian paths !1 and trails C�O Bicycle facilities and parking Transit or Shuttle Service • Density - 3-6 units/acre (Low -Density Residential) • Height - 1-2 stories • Lot Area - 6,000-14,000 sq. ft. per unit DEVELOPMENT •' ♦1 2018 Correlating J Zoning District R -A Residential Amenities District R-1 Single -Family Residence District MIXED NEIGHBORHOOD (MN) The Mixed Neighborhood designation applies to areas of the City intended for mixed land use types including single-family detached housing, duplexes, townhomes, and medium - density multi -family buildings as well as small scale commercial uses. Residential densities in these areas generally range between 8 and 12 units per acre, corresponding to site area allowances of 3,500-5,400 square feet per unit. These areas are residential in character but could also have neighborhood serving commercial uses that provide for the sale of goods and services generally needed on a day-to-day basis. The character of these areas is defined by the limited scale of businesses operating in these designations and may include local services, offices, small-scale retail stores and childcare centers. Other compatible uses, such as schools, nursing homes, fraternal organizations, private parks and religious facilities may also locate in this designation. Residential • Single -Family Residential • Two -Family Residential • Multi -Family Residential • Senior Living Facility Commercial • Small Scale Office/ Retail • Daycare Centers • Personal Service Public/institutional • Schools Recreational • Parks/Playgrounds Open Space • Sensitive Habitat MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN Primary Mode Vehicular (slow speeds) Secondary Mode R. Pedestrian paths /1 and trails C�b Bicycle facilities and parking f Transit or Shuttle Service • Density - 8-12 units/acre (Low -Mid Density Residential) • Height - 1-2 stories • Lot Area - 3,500-5,400 sq. ft. per unit n2018 Correlating �♦ Zoning District TN Traditional Neighborhood District R-2 Single and Two Family Residence District R-3 Medium Density Residential District B-1 Neighborhood Business District t 11 EAST BERTRAM STUDY AREA An area of unincorporated land exists along 90th Street NE between the western municipal boundary and Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. This Study Area represents an ideal residential growth location given available land, its proximity to existing City services, and the amenity and natural open space buffer of Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. As growth occurs, a new school campus is likely to be needed. The extension of School Boulevard to 90th Street NE will also provide greater access to this area. A new school campus could be located in close to proximity to Bertram, one possibility is near the School Boulevard extension to serve as a western anchor and complement the existing High School campus on the eastern end of School Boulevard. It is anticipated that single-family and mixed -residential neighborhoods would fill in around this school and create a new western enclave in Monticello. Small locally -serving commercial uses could also be located in this area to provide nearby goods and services and establish the area as a complete neighborhood unit. Neighborhood scale parks and open spaces would also be included as part of new developments. Given the amount of vacant land and close proximity to open space amenities, this area has the potential to become a premier residential neighborhood within Monticello. Prior to any proposed development, the extension of utilities, the transportation network and resources conservation priorities will need to be discussed and addressed. Residential Growth Residential development is projected in this area over time as a primary or secondary growth area, as a result of proximity to utilities, transportation improvements or other factors. Future development may include a range of housing types and mixed densities consistent with the Mixed Neighborhood designation, such as small -lot single family homes, attached townhomes and traditional single-family units. Some limited, small-scale commercial retail, service, and institutional uses can also be expected to serve this growth. New School A new school site has been identified as a potential need with continued growth and development of the City. A new school or educational campus within this Study Area would serve as a community center and focus of activity for the new neighborhood. The extension of School Boulevard and new roadways will better define potential location for a school. Ultimately, the School District will determine the need and location for a new school(s) based upon its facility planning needs. Resource Conservation Future development in East Bertram should also address natural resource conservation needs. Some natural resource areas may provide buffers or screening to adjacent land uses and could be designed as an integral part of the development as an amenity or passive park feature. Conservation style development techniques should be utilized whenever appropriate. Transportation/Connectivity The extension of School Boulevard is a primary transportation improvement priority for this area. It is expected that this extension would link to 90th Street NE. A detailed transportation study including a proposed roadway network and new intersections will be required for future development. Trails and related facilities are an important consideration and should be extended to connect Bertram Chain of Lakes with these new neighborhoods and other parts of Monticello. Utilities/Infrastructure Accommodating existing regional -scale utility infrastructure, while also extending local utilities are both important considerations in facilitating new development. Appropriately sized utility infrastructure is a critical component for long term capital planning and serving this new development. Green infrastructure techniques, such as bioswales, bioretention and biofiltration, to manage stormwater runoff should be applied to all new development in this study area. New housing and neighborhoods should take on a sustainable approach to land planning and development. Ideally, a master plan for the East Bertram Study Area would guide phased development over time as market demand for residential and other uses evolve over time. A comprehensive utility and infrastructure plan and consistency with the MOAA Agreement will also be needed when proposed development and annexation requests come forward. Utilization of existing power line easements should also be considered as opportunities for trails, wildlife corridors, and buffer areas between divergent land uses. 88 49<�« «� LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION EAST BERTRAM STUDY AREA FUTURE LAND USE FRAMEWORK CONCEPT PLAN ONLY The land use diagram provides a conceptual plan consistent with the FLUM and City's growth policies in the Comprehensive Plan. It provides more detail in consideration of other factors likely to impact future development. This area is considered a long term growth objective for the city. Although opportunities should always be pursued. Additional detailed study will be necessary prior to or concurrent with any development proposals. Key Factors 0 Existing Utility Easements — The existing overhead power lines present a major impediment to development within the area. The approach shown in this framework prioritizes the alignment of new streets, trails, and buffers along the easements in order to maximize contiguous tracts for development and enable a more cohesive neighborhood fabric. The easements should be used for trail/greenway corridors. QRoad Network— Existing collector streets have been extended to help create a connected block and street network that is well integrated with the rest of the City. Streetscape design will define the character of these new areas of the City and is an important consideration. OEducational Campus — The inclusion of a site that is suitable for a future school or campus is a key consideration for future planning. The site shown is approximately 70 acres. QCommercial Opportunity Sites—Several sites have been identified that may have increased viability for neighborhood -serving retail, service, and/or commercial uses. © Conservation Neighborhoods — Conservation neighborhoods may be appropriate in the western portions of the study area as a way to help manage growth and provide a suitable transition to adjacent natural areas to the west. t= Q EXHIBIT 3.10 School Blvd ,North,. + iI PO 3 MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 89 Planning Concept Study Area LJ Parcels Buildings 0 Streets +14+ Railroad 11111 Existing Utility Corridor Water Bodies Wetlands/Natural Areas Parks/Open Space Estate Residential Single -Family Residential Mixed Neighborhood Mixed -Density Residential Commercial/Residential Flex Public/Institutional OEM Potential New Street Potential Connections • • • Potential Pathways F y ,ice' yew ;y �.+ • •Rt School Blvd ,North,. + iI PO 3 MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 89 \I IT J W r , m gq Ie D CE IyI Mo ------------ ffin �,. t ti- �z+K ,.�' «� L-E-� Fes. � � g 1.°x•4 -�� � � CD All + � .:%+ � �� + � •*_' � �� m -fid'. v o 0 `0 `0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 �D m m co m m m rn D D Q m C ci 70 �0 0 0 0 � � CL cri 0 0 0- C� v Q Qsk) S' TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS November 12, 2021 To: Heather Lorch, Capstone From: Katherine Schmidt, PE Re: Trip Generation Study for Monticello-Schluender Residential Development — Monticello, MN Per your request, SZ Traffic Solutions, LLC has conducted a trip generation analysis for the proposed Montiecello-Schluender Residential Development in Monticello, MN. The proposed development will include approximately 300 single family homes. The site is adjacent to the south side of 90th Street NE, is east of Chamberlain Ave NE and west of Prescot Dr, and is located to the north of School Boulevard (see attached Figure 1). School Boulevard currently terminates to the south of the southeast corner of the subject property, and is planned to connect to 901h Street NE via two potential routes. For one route, the alignment of School Boulevard turns north through the subject property bifurcating the site into two parcels; and for the second route it would continue to the west along the southern property line separating the site from the proposed Middle School site to the south and connect to 9011h Street NE at approximately Chamberlain Ave NE (see Figures 2 and 3). In either case, access to the school property and to the subject site would need to be provided. This memorandum documents the anticipated site generated traffic and based on the site traffic suggests potential reclassification of School Boulevard, as well as, the classification of the access roads within the site. Trip Generation The trip generation for the proposed residential development has been estimated based on the methodology described by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in Trip Generation, 10th Edition. The Single Family homes correspond to ITE Land Use Code 210. Table 1 summarizes the findings. Table 1 Trip Generation Land Use Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Enter Exit Single Family Homes (300) 2,832 Trips 56 Trips 166 Trips 187 Trips 110 Trips TOTAL 2.832 Trips 222 Trips 297 Trips As shown in Table 1, the site is estimated to generates 56 entering and 166 exiting trips during the morning traffic peak, 187 entering and 110 exiting trips during the afternoon traffic peak hour, and 2,832 trips per day. The daily trips can help determine the classification of the roadways providing access to the site. Roadway Classification Roadway classification is based on several factors including (but not limited to) the relationship between mobility versus access, and the anticipated travel demand measured in terms of average daily traffic (ADT). The Table below from the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan summarizes the City's Guidelines. The roadway classification then is used to determine access spacing, right of way needs, trail and sidewalk requirements, pavement design, etc. The City of Monticello has established standards for design based on the classification in their subdivision standards. The Table on the following page has been reproduced from these standards. Currently, School Boulevard in the vicinity of the site is planned as a major collector which presumes a 4 - lane roadway with at least 7,500 ADT and requires a minimum of 100 feet of right way. As mentioned earlier, School Boulevard will terminate at 90th Street NE. The current vacant land that would put traffic onto School Boulevard include subject property and the future Middle School. The subject property would send some traffic to 90th Street and some traffic to School Boulevard. For planning purposes, it is assumed the Monticello-Schluender site will send 2,500 ADT to School Boulevard, and the school will send 1,300 ADT to School Boulevard for a total of 3,800 ADT. This is far less than would be traveling on a Major Collector. If the alignment of School Boulevard follows the first path, through the subject site and to 90th Street NE, the Middle School access would create a new intersection with a local access road for the school from the west, and the Monticello-Schleuender site would access from at least two new streets 21 Page Monticello-Schluender Residential, Monticello Right -of -Ways Classification AA M Principal ArterlaI 30,000+ 4 -Lane Divided 150 to 200 ft State Highway 25 Minor Arterial 15.000 - 30,000 4 -Lane Divided 124 to 150 ft School Boulevard Majflr Collector 7,504 - 18,000 4 -Lane Undivided 100 ft 7th SUeet East 90.000 - 25,000 4 -Lane Divided 120 ft NA 2,440 - 8,000 2 -Lane 80 ft Chelsea Road Minor Collector 4,000 -16,000 3 -Lane 80 ft NA 7,500 - 8,000 4 -Lane Ondivided 100 ft NA Local 0-9.000 2 -Lane 50 ft River St.eet The roadway classification then is used to determine access spacing, right of way needs, trail and sidewalk requirements, pavement design, etc. The City of Monticello has established standards for design based on the classification in their subdivision standards. The Table on the following page has been reproduced from these standards. Currently, School Boulevard in the vicinity of the site is planned as a major collector which presumes a 4 - lane roadway with at least 7,500 ADT and requires a minimum of 100 feet of right way. As mentioned earlier, School Boulevard will terminate at 90th Street NE. The current vacant land that would put traffic onto School Boulevard include subject property and the future Middle School. The subject property would send some traffic to 90th Street and some traffic to School Boulevard. For planning purposes, it is assumed the Monticello-Schluender site will send 2,500 ADT to School Boulevard, and the school will send 1,300 ADT to School Boulevard for a total of 3,800 ADT. This is far less than would be traveling on a Major Collector. If the alignment of School Boulevard follows the first path, through the subject site and to 90th Street NE, the Middle School access would create a new intersection with a local access road for the school from the west, and the Monticello-Schleuender site would access from at least two new streets 21 Page Monticello-Schluender Residential, Monticello Street Design Eps 119kpariamlegal.comiap V sxpart-requas(s11421be06-tr1 tri 4 c2 b -83c5 -79V c785ea47; dovrrnlaad 1+14!21.9TGAM tittps)iexpartamlegal.boudapi+ekpori-T quests+1421beO&bltr1-4c2b-83c5-79"c785ea47Jdownraad1 16130 Design Element Mirror Major A irtor Local Cul-de, Pathway Private Arterial Coflecfor Collector Streets Sacs Common Access" lg t- -way w1 150 ft. ft. 84 - 104 ft. 84 ft. 60 ft. 34 ft. 30 ft. Paving width— 52 ft. 52 ft_ 44 ft_ 32 ft_ 32 t .14 5 10 ft. 20 ft_ Maximum gfade 7.L5�% apo{ 8r°��o/ I iRimum glade /�7.-5% �7.5C�°1/fir /�$C°lpo� �8% 0-50% ().5% 0.5% 0.5 fP 0.5% /�8 0.5% 0.519 Cross grade 2 - 3% crown 2% max 2-3% crown Design section 10 ton 9 ton 9 ton 9 tort 9 ton WA 9 ton Minimum angle 9.0 90 84 70 70 NIA 70 intersection Minimum curb radius 65 ft. 50 R. 35 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. - 20 ft. Grades for 25 feet 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% before intersection Site triangles (distance along sides 694130 ft_ 490130 ft_ 490}30 ft_ 250!30 ft_ 25030 WA 250}30 ft. of) through ft. s1rvet/stop street Horizontal align (mire. 700 ft_ 500 ft. 300 ft_ 200 ft. 75 ft_ WA 100 ft. radius of centedlne) Vertical curves (min. 650 ft_ 475 ft. 325 ft_ 250 ft. 100 ft. WA 300 ft. sight distance) Required Required Required Sidewalk See Pathway on both on both on beth raqulred above sides sides sides on single design side notations (VOTE: Alternate nght, f -way width requirements may be allowed for speafic thoroughfares based ort anticipated traffic volume, planned function of street, jurisdiction of street, topography, and character of abutting land use. Increased width will be set by the City Councii upon recommendatien of the Planning Commission and City Engineer. Street design requirements may be altered based on existing topographic conditions as approved by the City Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and City Engineer. Based on future roadway functionai classification *As measured from face of cufb to face of curb_ **The City Council may choose to approve private common access for PUO, townhouse development, and the like, where appropriate. Standards far said access, however, shall comply wlth minimums as outlined for minor streets (except ROW) and all other provisions as required by the Council_ intersections from School Boulevard. In this scenario, at the school intersection north into the site School Boulevard would carry only 2,500 ADT which seem more appropriate for a local street design. A local street design would allow for narrower lanes and a more curvilinear alignment, calming traffic and creating a neighborhood feel, and would require less right of way allowing the developer to be more creative with neighborhood trails and other amenities. 31 Page Monticello-Schluender Residential, Monticello If the alignment of School Boulevard follows the second path, continuing westward along the southern property line and terminating at 901h Street NE at approximately Chamberlain Avenue NE, access to the Monticello-Schuender residential development could occur from two new intersections with School Boulevard, each handling approximately 1,250 ADT of the site traffic. After the western site access the remaining traffic on School Boulevard would be school traffic of approximately 1,300 ADT, again School Boulevard through this section may be better designated as a local street. Slower speeds near the Middle School and in the vicinity of the residential development seem more suitable for the area. In conclusion, the development trip generation suggests less traffic than originally considered for this area. Regardless of the alignment option selected the roadway should be designed with lower speeds and should favor neighborhood quality versus mobility. Please contact Katherine Schmidt at.katie@s2traffic or 952-212-7625 with any questions. 41 Page Monticello-Schluender Residential, Monticello 0,,Beacon fright County, MN Dateseared4!T{F I Last Data Upkm&yd� 4fT202I &Mil AM OevekWed by4--$ ScIY- ier Vicinity Map rXrIkWM Legermd Roads — CSAHCL C7YCL — Ml1NEL P RYVATEC L — TWPCL Hlghmays — Ynterslate — State Hwy — US Hwy CI tyfTowrnfdp ilmFts ❑ { ❑ t Parcrls Tarrem 51 Page Monticello-Schluender Residential, Monticello Access Through Site from Comp Plan � J- (D j North City of Monticello Boundary Monticello Orderly Annexation Monticello Township Boundart Parcels Streets - Not Classified 4"4, Railroad Water Bodes Existing Rood C1aSVfKODOnS iiiiiiiii Principal ArtenaI - Interstate r_ Principal ArtenaI - Other Minor Arterial — Major Collector — Minor Collector Local Future Rood Clossikowns ria Principal Arterial Interstate 9111 Principal Arterial - Other Minor Artenal sees Major Collector ..•• Minor Collector Local • Future Interchange Future Intersection Note. Future roadway olgnments conceptual and tequee additional planning and acrolysis. Future rives crossings are Ming studied by the Central Mississippi Rivet Regional Planning Partnership, 61 Page Monticello-Schluender Residential, Monticello P. I ESTAZF. flALTOV Wyk AV �c�vac� av�AE LAE'1[SF. UL spm ; l l SIHu4E `` FAM1L,4 M.4X5t] I�E�aE�E�DQNb6D CIIAMBtiD_1.1�1t1 fl�h.YlE. �,� � y� �FlST11RE SGRObL WO Feu. EfJIC� �'1y Krim NGkak�DC.4Eb6b SAVANISA SLH06t LiL ZED7K r+ixsa w usEri►Eaot��en � --� --- ,� �, PAYiC: SVA _xC 7 SGUESflL uta. Puuu t• i ! Second Option Connect to 90th Street at Chamberlain 71 Page Monticello-Schluender Residential, Monticello i ENVIMMEU7 CLAPTE / LLLS4�daM ��bL LA1SD[LATbR . _ — SAVANISA SLH06t LiL ZED7K r+ixsa w usEri►Eaot��en � --� --- ,� �, PAYiC: SVA _xC 7 SGUESflL uta. Puuu t• i ! Second Option Connect to 90th Street at Chamberlain 71 Page Monticello-Schluender Residential, Monticello Future System Analysis Table 5-12: Recommended Access Spacing Guidelines (1) Subject to Access Committee staff review (2) Any spacing deviations shall have a detailed traffic study completed by the requesting agency, and approved by the county engineer (3) Conditional secondary access is defined as right-in/out (with raised median) WRIGHT COUNTY ®©®n LONG RANGE 5-30 Functional Typical Intersection Spacing (2) Signal Primary Full Movement Conditional Secondary Class Area or Facility Type (1) Functional Spacing Private Access Category Class Intersection Intersection (3) v 1 High Priority Interregional Corridors UIF Freeway Interchange Access Only Principal 1A -F Full Grade Separation Interchange Access Only Arterials 1A Rural, Exurban & Bypass 1 Mile 1/2 Mile Interim Only By Dation Only evi By Deviation Only Q 2 Medium Priority Interregional Corridors 2A -F Full Grade Separation Interchange Access Only 2A Rural, Exurban & Bypass 1 Mile 1/2 Mile STRONGLY DISCOURAGED $ Etion or yxce p v Principal B Deviation OnlyDeviation Only Urban 1/2 Mile 1/4 Mile STRONGLY DISCOURAGED 13y Exception or O2B Arterials A Urbanizing B Deviation OnlyDeviation Only 2C Urban Core 300 - 600 feet dependent upon block length 1/4 Mile Permitted Subject to Conditions 3 High Priority Regional Corridors Access Category Not Applicable for Study Area 4 Principal Arterials in Primary Trade centers Access Category Not Applicable for Study Area .d 5 Minor Arterials 0 5A Rural/Urban Mobility Corridor 1/2 Mile 1/4 Mile 1/2 Mile Permitted Subject pA to Conditions 5B Urbanizing Arterial 1/4 Mile 1/8 Mile 1/4 Mile By Exception or Minor Arterials Deviation Only 5C Urban Core Arterial 300 - 600 feet dependent upon block length 1/4 Mile Permitted Subject to Conditions v 6 Collectors 6A Rural Collector 1/2 Mile 1/4 Mile 1/2 Mile :3 6131 Rural/Urbanizing Collector 1/4 Mile 1/8 Mile 1/4 Mile Permitted Subject (j Collectors to Conditions 6132 Local Collector 1/8 Mile NA 1/4 Mile 6C Urban Core Collector 300 - 600 feet dependent upon block length 1/8 Mile 7 Specific Access Plan 7 All All By Adopted Plan (1) Subject to Access Committee staff review (2) Any spacing deviations shall have a detailed traffic study completed by the requesting agency, and approved by the county engineer (3) Conditional secondary access is defined as right-in/out (with raised median) WRIGHT COUNTY ®©®n LONG RANGE 5-30 Existing Conditions Principal Arterials • Connect major activity centers • Provide significant continuity at a regional level • Serve long distance trips • Provide limited access and high speeds • Serve regional or statewide travesheds • Example: I-94, TH 55, US Hwy 12 MinorArterials • Connect key activity center • Provide continuity on a sub -regional level • Serve medium to long distance trips • Provide limited access and high speeds • Serve regional travelsheds • Example: TH 55, TH 24, County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 6, CSAH 19, CSAH 35, and CSAH 39 Collectors • Connect local activity centers to arterials • Provide increased continuity at a local level • Serve short to medium length trips • Balance emphasis of access and mobility • Provide access to localized areas • Example: CSAH 18, CSAH 37, County Road (CR) 117 Local Routes • Connect neighborhoods, businesses and schools • Provide access to higher -order roadways • Provide lowest degree of continuity • Allow closely spaced access points • Provide direct access to property • Serve limited travelsheds WRIGHT COUNTY ©® LONG RANGE 2-7 �T STEARNS � LTi South Have Ann rr Cok Clearwater • , 1 SHERBURNE it • 111 r. Monticello 106 a 14 Maples 6* Lake 1a • 15 11 y, ato 12 1z Montrose Howard Lake Waverly J— ,; -• . L MCLEOD CARVER Otsego •117 ® 2 17 ® g 16 4.�.• m 137 Ib rtvill 1 C is Dayton St. M' ell 117 4 Hanover 120 1 y�l.6 HENNEPIN Cok Clearwater • , 1 SHERBURNE it • 111 r. Monticello 106 a 14 Maples 6* Lake 1a • 15 11 y, ato 12 1z Montrose Howard Lake Waverly J— ,; -• . L MCLEOD CARVER WRIGHT COUNTY MOSDO LONG RANGE TRANSD"PTATirnni of n 0 1 Wright Count MINNESOTA Otsego •117 ® 20 17 ® g 16 4.�.• m 137 Ib rtvill 1 C is Dayton St. M' ell 117 4 Hanover 120 1 y�l.6 HENNEPIN WRIGHT COUNTY MOSDO LONG RANGE TRANSD"PTATirnni of n 0 1 Wright Count MINNESOTA Principal Arterial - Interstate Principal Arterial -Other 39 39 Minor Arterial ® Major Collector 25 - o_ ..� �� 1— �;� m�?y Minor Collector 94 Future Minor Arterial Future Major Collecto r Future Minor Collect Future Local ar.• +7Proposed Changes 1iA ! �37i �� ` I�, •V'� 1101 \ Local • � ' `` it1 ' � �A vyoad Symbols sa Interstate ,im` _ ; .r �3 *� \ � .•-' � � �► )1I 36 55 State Highway �1r , o ��07. lir i � Ar . County State Aid Highway • �1 ���:, �, County Road 35 � 1 35 figure 5-2 u Future Functional Functional Classification Changes (Northeast) • 75 STEARNS 24 1 94 • AADT < 500 $ 500-2,000 2,000 - 5,000 South Hayp—n 24 - ,� �� 5,000 - 10,000 5, • • . 10,000 - 15,000 55MILi� 39 39 AADT > 15,000 19 101 - Future Alignment z 6 S 25 18 94 ad Symbols Annandale ss • ' � . 3s a2 sa Interstate [` ®� 36 ss State Highway z s®®® { ount3 State Aid High 37 1 County Road ■ � is • 35 38 � �i i20 �� .i.■C�■■� z5 figure 4-1 �i - , • ear 2040 AADT ■ 13 17 raffic Forecast CoColumn�1�■�' ■�� �2� AADT < 500 500-2,000 2,000 - 5,000 5,000 - 10,000 10,000 - 15,000 AADT > 15,000 Future Alignment Road Symbols 94 Interstate 55 tate Highway ounty State Aid Highway County Road igure 4-2 ear 2040 AADT raffic Forecast 0 11 r 1■ I�■ ION AADT < 500 500-2,000 2,000 - 5,000 • 5,000 - 10,000 _ ����o � 10,000 - 15,000 ,,- r :`,��1•:" AADT > 15,000 25.� 1194J�■ IM Source: MnDOT (2016) 55 1p�M 55 Md,-,j..g, ■�� � I � Im 1 ■ 2W1, In � 4 OHIO%�■ W■■ L Road Symbols sa Interstate ss State Highway County State Aid Highway County Road 1 Figure 2-13 Existing Average Daily Traffic 91 0 1 2 Ij OU rAs 'A )T� �j 101 MM AADT < 500 500-2,000 2,000 - 5,000 5,000 - 10,000 10,000 - 15,000 AADT > 15,000 urce: MnDOT (2016) I Symbols Interstate I Ss State Highway County State Aid Highway County Road Figure 2-14 Existing Average Daily Traffic (Northeast) 25 W AADT < 500 500-2,000 2,000 - 5,000 5,000 - 10,000 10,000 - 15,000 AADT > 15,000 Source: MnDOT (2016) I Symbols Interstate �7tNe W6�4 � /tl ss State Highway �` County State Aid N;::;'■ rI _ County Road �. _ �` 5 �■�� � 25 55 'Figure 2-15 _ Existing Average Dailv Traffic Bu