Loading...
Planning Commission Minutes 06-05-1990 . . . MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 5, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Dan McConnon, Mori Malone, Richard Martie, Cindy Lemm, Richard Carlson Members Absent: None Staff Present: Gary Anderson, Jeff O'Neill 1. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Dan McConnon at 7:04 p.m. 2. Motion was made by Mori Malone, seconded by Richard Carlson, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held May 1, 1990. Motion carried unanimously with Richard Martie and Cindy Lemm absent. 3. Motion was made by Cindy Lemm, seconded by Mori Malone, to approve the minutes of the special meeting held May 14, 1990. Motion carried unanimously with Richard Martie absent. 4. Public Hearinq--A variance request to allow construction of a qaraqe addition wi thin the side yard setback requirement. Applicant, Ruth A. Anderson. Gary Anderson, zoning Administrator, explained to Planning Commission members and the public Mrs. Anderson's variance request to allow the placement of an existing detached garage with a new attached garage being within two feet of the side property line. With no further input, Chairperson Dan McConnon then turned the meeting to input from the public. Mrs. Anderson was represented by Mr. Mike Bregenzer of Mike's Construction. He explained to Planning Commission members that the front site plan that was submitted with their agenda supplement has now been changed. The new proposed attached garage would be placed in the same place as the existing detached garage. They would not move the proposed new attached garage any farther forward, as there is a big oak tree in the way, and they would not want to remove this tree. Mrs. Lee Trunnel, adjoining property owner to the east of Mrs. Anderson's property, explained to Planning Commission members she and her husband have no objections to Mrs. Anderson's variance request if the attached garage is placed where the existing detached garage currently exists. Page 1 . . . Planning Commission Minutes - 6/5/90 There being no further input from the public, Chairperson Dan McConnon closed the public hearing. A discussion was then held amongst Planning Commission members. The discussion centered around the closeness of the existing detached garage to the property line; and with this being a non-conforming building, should it be allowed to remain that close to the property line. There being no further input from the Planning Commission members, a motion was made by Mori Malone, seconded by Richard Martie, to approve the variance request to allow construction of a garage addition within the side yard setback requirement. Motion carried unanimously. Reason for approval: The hardship was created by the placement of this garage on the property with no other reasonable place for the location of it on the property. 5. Public Hearinq--A variance request to allow a curb cut access within 40 feet from the intersection of two (2) street riqht- of-ways. Applicant, JKMV Partnership and 21st Century Builders. Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, explained to Planning Commission members and the public the applicant's variance request to allow placement of a curb cut wi thin 40 feet from the intersection of two street right-of-ways. The applicants are proposing to construct a curb cut within 10 feet of their property line. Mr. O'Neill explained that a letter which was submitted to Planning Commission members from the Public Works Director, John Simola, explained his concerns with allowing placement of a driveway in this location. Chairperson Dan McConnon then opened the public hearing. Mr. Russ Rosa, architect for the applicants, explained to Planning Commission members that the intent of this curb cut access is to facilitate movement of traffic primarily for shipping and receiving to the rear of these businesses within the strip center. Chairperson Dan McConnon then closed the public hearing and opened the meeting for input from the Planning Commission members. One of the concerns raised by the Planning Commission members was the trees as shown within the boulevard area being too close to the proposed driveway curb cut. Maybe those trees could be removed or placed in a different location to allow for sight distances from this curb cut access. They felt that maybe it could be allowed if it could be narrowed to be an exit only at this location. Page 2 . . . Planning Commission Minutes - 6/5/90 There being no further input from the Planning Commission members, motion was made by Mori Malone, seconded by Cindy Lemm, to approve the variance request to allow a curb cut access within 40 feet from the intersection of two public right-of-ways provided that: 1) this curb cut would start 22 feet from the property line; 2) the curb cut access would be limited to 12 feet in width and would be signed accordingly for an exit only, with people being allowed to turn left or right once exiting from this area; 3) the trees planted in the right-of-way near this curb cut access be removed; and 4) in the event that 5th street is actively used as a public right-of-way via installation of a city street, or if regular or weekly train traffic is established, then the variance is terminated. This statement is to be recorded against the property. Motion carried unanimously. Reason for approval: This approval will not impair the intent of the ordinance, as the curb cut restriction was not intended to apply when one of the right-of-ways is under used and not scheduled for development. 6 . New Planninq Commission member interviews. The Planning Commission members interviewed the three applicants which were present, Marie Lindenfelser, Bruce Thielen, and Jon Bogart. After conducting the interviews, the Planning Commission members chose not to make a decision at this time. They thanked the applicants for applying for the position and will make their decision at a later date. The applicants were informed that the City Council would be considering the Planning Commission recommendation for their choice as the new Planning Commission member and would make their decision at the June 11, 1990, City Council meeting. 7 . Continued public hearinq--Consideration of an ordinance amendment to off-street parkinq requirements. Applicant, City of Monticello. Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, apologized for not having the agenda item ready for considering possible ordinance amendments. He is currently working with the City's consulting engineering firm and the Public Works Department to make a recommendation for the Planning Commission members to consider an ordinance amendment to the off-street parking requirements. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission members to continue the public hearing until the next regularly scheduled meeting. Page 3 . . . Planning Commission Minutes - 6/5/90 Additional Information Items 1. A variance request to allow construction of a porch addition within the front yard setback requirement. Applicant, Ronald Reinking. Council action: No action necessary, as the request did not come before them. 2. A conditional use request to allow a day care (headstart program) in an R-2 (single and two family residential) zone. Applicant, First Baptist Church/Wright County Communi ty Action Headstart Program. Council action: Approved as per Planning Commission recommendation. 3. Consideration of approval of a preliminary plat entitled Kirkman Addition. Applicant, The Lincoln Companies. Council action: Approved as per Planning Commission recommendation. 4. Consideration of a rezoning request of land south of the realigned 7th Street right-of-way from PZM (performance zone mixed) to B-3 (highway business) zoning. Applicant, The Lincoln Companies. Council action: Approved as per Planning Commission recommendation. 5 . Consideration of a conditional use permit which would allow retail/commercial activity in a PZM zone. Applicant, JKMV Partnership/21st Century Builders. Council action: No action required, as the request was continued. 6. Consideration of a variance request which would allow less than the minimum parking lot setback or variance request which would allow less than the minimum number of off-street parking spaces for commercial use in a PZM zone. Applicant, JKMV partnership/21st Century Builders. Council action: No action required, as the request was continued. 7. Consideration of a zoning ordinance amendment convenience food parking requirement. Applicant, Builders. Council action: Approved as per Commission recommendation. reducing Shingobee Planning 8 . Consideration of adopting an ordinance amendment which would allow operation of a prototype furnace using rubber products as a fuel in an I-I (light industrial) zone. Applicant, Ray Schmidt. Council action: No action required, as the request was continued. Page 4 Planning commission Minutes - 6/5/90 . 9 . Consideration of a conditional use permit which would allow operation of a prototype furnace using rubber products as a fuel. Applicant, Ray Schmidt. Council action: No action required, as the request was tabled. 10. A variance request to allow no concrete curbing or curb barrier within five feet of a lot line in certain areas of a parking lot, and a request to allow additional driveway within 125 feet of an existing driveway. Applicant, Dean Hoglund/ Ken Schwartz. Council action: No action required, as the request did not come before them. 11. A zoning amendment to amend the entire section of Chapter 18, Flood Plain Management Ordinance. Applicant, City of Monticello. Council action: Approved as per Planning Commission recommendation. 12. Consideration of an ordinance amendment to off-street parking requirements. Applicant, City of Monticello. Council action: No action required, as the request was continued. . 13. A continued conditional use request to allow retail commercial activities as listed in Chapter 12, Section 2, B-2 (limited business district) of this ordinance, in a PZM (performance zone mixed) zone. Applicant, JKMV Partnership/21st century Builders. Council action: Approved as per Planning Commission recommendation. 14. Continued consideration of adopting an ordinance amendment which would allow operation of a prototype furnace using rubber products as a fuel in an I-I (light industrial) zone. Applicant, Ray Schmidt. Council action: Approved as per Planning Commission recommendation. 15. Consideration of a continued conditional use permit which would allow operation of a prototype rubber burning furnace incidental to a principal use as a conditional use in an I-I (light industrial) zone. Applicant, Ray Schmidt. Council action: Approved as per Planning Commission recommendation. 16. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission members was to set the next tentative date for the Monticello Planning Commission meeting for July 5, 1990, 7:00 p.m. 17. Motion was made by Mori Malone, seconded by Richard Martie, to adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, . ~~~ Gar Anderson Zoning Administrator page 5