EDA Agenda 08-21-2001
.
.
.
AGENDA
MONTICELLO F.CONOMIC DEVI(LOPMF.NT AlJTHORITY
Tuesday, August 21,2001 - 4:00 p.m.
City Hall - 505 Walnut Street - Academy Room
MEMBERS: Chair Rill Oemeules, Vice Chair Barb Schwientek, Assist Treasurcr Ken Maus,
Clint Ilerbst, Roger Carlson, Ron Hoglund, and Darrin Lahr.
ST AFF:
Treasurcr Rick Wolfsteller, Exccutive Director Ollie Koropchak, Rccorder Lori
Kraemer.
GUESTS:
Steve Grittman, Northwest Associated Consultants
DA T Chair Pam Campbell
I. Call to order.
2. Consideration to approve the July 19,2001 EDA n1inutes.
3. Considcration or adding or rcmoving agenda items.
4.
Consideration to hear of the interest of Block 35 propcrty owncrs for revitalization of
rear-parking entry area as prcsented by Consultant Grittman and authorization to move
forward.
5. Consideration of Exccutive Director's Report.
6. Othcr Business.
7. Adjournment.
.
.
.
MINUTES
MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Thursday, .July 19,2001 - 4:00 p.m.
City Hall - 505 Walnut Street
Members Present:
Chair Bill Demeules, Vice Chair Barb Schwientek, Assist Treasurer Ken
Maus, Clint Herbst, Ron Hoglund and Darrin Lahr.
Members Absent:
Roger Carlson
Staff Present:
Treasurer Rick Wolfsteller, Executive Director Ollie Koropchak, Recorder
Lori Kraemer.
Guests:
Steve Grittman, Northwest Associated Consultants
Pat Jensen, EDMA Company
Bruce Hamond
Pam Campbell, DA T Chair
1. Call to order.
Chair Demeules called the meeting to order at 4 pm.
2.
Consideration to approve the June 19.2001 EDA minutes.
Ron Hoglund stated that there was an error in item 5 of the minutes, the address listed
should state 207 Pine Street.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY RON HOGLUND AND SECONDED BY CLINT
HERBST TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 19, 2001 EDA MEETING
WITH THE CORRECTION AS NOTED. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Consideration of adding or removing agenda items. None
4. Consideration to hear results of meeting between Block 35 property owners as presented
bv Consultant Grittman and consideration to authorize DMRF funding.
Ollie Koropchak. Executive Director. advised that at the June EDA meeting. Consultant
Grittman presented two design concepts for the rear of the buildings on Block 35. the
objective being to create uniform parking and common trash areas. The EDA suggested a
third option: a rear plaza concept. The EDA to evaluate the potential to participate with
the funding subject to cost estimates and willingness of property owners. Grittman was
directed to meet with property owners. prepare cost estimates. and report back to the
EDA Minutes ~ 07/19101
.
EDA and DA T was invited for input.
Steve Grittman reported on his meeting with two of the business owners, Al Loch and
Marn Flicker. and presented their concept to the EDA. Steve provided drawings for
review as well as estimates provided by WSB showing two possible alternatives.
Grittman stated the difference was adding in concrete sidewalk and curb/gutters or paint
existing pavement and use curb stops. Grittman stated the difference in cost would be
about $25,000. Grittman added that Loch and Flicker expressed a concern regarding
drainage and a general doubt that if this was a feasible project. Grittman discussed their
concept of having remote dumpster locations in the existing parking lot and leave the
linear parking showing the layout they provided which would be essentially the same as
the option Grittman had presented. He noted the problem with having the dumpsters
located in the City parking lot would be that they are somewhat remote, and Flicker had
stated they have semi trailers backing into that area as well which may make access
dit11cult.
Grittman stated he felt comfortable that the business owners liked the design. Koropchak
asked if the other business owners had stated an interest and Grittman stated that
according to both Flicker and Loch, they felt the others were interested and it was more
of a scheduling conflict that kept them from attending their meeting.
.
Barb Schwientek stated a concern with Dominos and if they would be willing to use the
dumpsters as well. Grittman also added that the City wanted the businesses to be part of
an agreement, didn't think the common dumpsters would work but separate containers
within the enclosure would work.
Pam CampbelL DA T, asked if they mentioned dumpsters in the City parking lot as she
stated she thought the City's parking lot was not rated to handle that size vehicle which
Grittman concurred. Regarding snowplowing concerns, it was stated that the EDA would
be helping the businesses improve their sites with the idea that the businesses would still
maintain them.
Schwientek asked if an agreement could be drafted based on what was presented and get
together with the owners to get a consensus of agreement. Bruce Hammond stated that
the same type of concept was being done between Locust/Walnut, the businesses got
together and reviewed some concepts and the owners signed off on a letter of intent. the
idea being there is preliminary approval of the owners on that block for moving ahead on
the concept. then coming back to owners with ideas and costs.
Grittman asked about the feelings of the EDA toward the concept presented by the
businesses and his concept of combined. head in parking. They stated they liked it. but
.
2
.
.
.
EDA Minutes - 07/19/01
would like to move the dumpsters avvay from the parking. Regarding the concrete and
curb, the businesses felt that the grade is slight and would not be possible to create a
raised sidewalk as this may create a drainage problem. They suggested to possibly cut
out the existing bituminous and put the concrete there, maintaining the grade. The EDA
suggested to possibly incorporate a barrier such as a small fence and pots to differentiate
the parking. Campbell asked about drainage coming off the roofs as well and what that
may due to the design. Grittman stated the business owners were concerned about having
landscaping too close to the building due to the run off from the roofs. but he stated the
concept most likely accommodates that issue.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BARB SCHWIENTEK AND SECONDED BY RON
HOGLUND TO AUTHORIZE STEVE GRITTMAN TO PREPARE A LETTER OF
INTENT FROM THE EDA TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WOULD
PRESENT THEM WITH THE CONCEPT PROPOSED BY GRITTMAN, LOCH AND
FLICKER TO GET A COMMITMENT FROM THEM TO WORK WITH THE EDA
FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE REALIZATION THAT 75% TO 100%
OF THE COST WOULD MOST LIKEL Y BE PICKED UP BY THE EDA.
GRITTMAN WAS ALSO ASKED TO MEET INDIVIDUALL Y WITH THE OWNERS
WHO COULD NOT ATTEND A JOINT MEETING. Motion carried unanimously.
5.
Consideration ofa request to amend terms of the Loan Agreement for DMRF Loan No.
III between the EDA and VisCom, Inc.
Koropchak advised that Bruce Hamond, VisCom. Inc., is requesting the EDA amend the
terms of DMRF Loan No. 111 and also noted that on November 8, 2000, the DMRF non-
performance date was extended from May 29, 2001 to August 29,2001.
Koropchak attached the amortization schedule based on the loan agreement and a copy of
the loan payment of June 22, 2001, and a note attached to the payment requesting the
amount of the check be applied as interest only for June and July. The Finance
Department suggested not accepting the payment until the terms of the agreement were
reviewed by EDA.
Mr. I-Iamond addressed the EDA and stated he would like to get away from writing a
check every month for $115.78. .and would like the option to either pay one check for th~
year for interest (balloon in 3 years), at end of 3 years paying the balloon, or pay one
check for interest in 6 months and the next check at the end of the year would be principle
for the year. Has no problem paying the interest up-front.
Hoglund questioned re-\vriting the amortization schedule. stating there would be
additional interest. but Hammond did not think it was significant enough. The EDA
,.,
.J
.
.
.
EDA Minutes ~ 07/19/01
stated the loan agreement would have to be amended. Hamond asked if the loan
agreement specified the payment of principle and interest but it was noted that the
agreement stated only the way the loan is to be paid. Ken Maus stated his concern with
additional attorney' s fees for drafting papers. Hamond stated he did not want to go
through an amendment to the agreement, he would rather pay in advance for principle and
interest. City Administrator Wolfsteller stated that would not be a problem as the loan
agreement doesn't state that it can't be done.
No action was necessary, Mr Hamond will make one payment for principle and interest
annually.
Koropchak also advised that Hamond is requesting an extension to September/October
for the exterior of his project. The contractor will finish this project with another project
in that area if that one is approved by the City. Koropchak asked if 6 months would be
sufficient and Hammond stated that it was.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KEN MADS AND SECONDED BY RON HOGLUND
TO EXTEND THE NON-PERFORMANCE DATE OF AUGUST 29, 2001 TO MAY
29,2002 FOR DMRF NO. III (MATCHING GRANT) BETWEEN THE EDA AND
VISCOM, INC. Motion carried unanimously.
6.
Consideration to review for discussion the preliminarv GMEF loan application for
EDMA Companv. Pat Jensen, Applicant.
Koropchak introduced Pat Jensen, the President and 51 % owner of EDMA Company.
The company is six years old and leases space in Eden Prairie. The company is a small
machine shop which does engineering, design, machining, and assembly. This business
will occupy 5,000 sq ft of the proposed 10,000 sq ft metal building with rock front. The
remaining 5,000 sq ft will house a new business specializing in maintenance of and
leased indoor-storage of recreational trailers. The company requires no outside storage.
The proposed builder is Unlimited Trades of Rogers, MN. Request is for a $30,000 real
estate loan. The Prospect Team of Kevin Doty, Ron Hoglund, Brad Barger, and
Koropchak visited the existing plant in June.
The company has a Purchase Agreement with Carl and Eric Bondhus for a lA-acre parcel
to the north of Lake Tool. The project will create 3 new jobs for the City of Monticello
within two years. Koropchak worked with Mr. Jensen's lender as well who is working
with SBA.
The EDA advised Koropchak to add in the late payment policy for the attorney when he
completes the loan agreement. No action was necessary.
4
.
.
.
EDA Minutes - 07/19/01
L
Consideration to approve or denv GMEF Loan No. 019 for EDMA Company.
After review and discussion of the preliminary application from EDMA Company, the
EDA was asked to consider approval or denial of the request for a $30,000 GMEF loan.
The lender, Western Bank, has provided a copy of the Bank's commitment letter which is
subject to SBA approval and other information.
The City Council will consider ratification of the EDA' s action for compliance of the
EDA-GMEF Business Subsidy Criteria on July 23, 200 I. If approved, the GMEF will be
disbursed at the closing date yet to be determined. After the EDA reviewed the
application it was found that the applicant meets all necessary criteria.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DARRIN LAHR AND SECONDED BY BARB
SCHWIENTEK TO APPROVE GMEF LOAN NO. 019 FOR LLC DBA EDMA
COMP ANY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,000, WITH THE TERMS OF 20 YEARS,
4.75% INTEREST, BALLOON IN 5 YEARS AND A LOAN FEE OF $200.
COLLA TERAL, GUARANTEES AND OTHER CONDITION REQUIREMENTS TO
BE DETERMINED AND PREPARED BY THE GMEF ATTORNEY. THE GMEF
LOAN APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO SBA APPROVAL AND COUNCIL
RATIFICATION OF EDA ACTION. Motion carried unanimously.
8.
Consideration of Executive Director's Reoort.
Koropchak provided the report. Schwientek asked about the status of the Chamber
building facade improvements and Koropchak stated that Drayna was very busy at this
time had not begun the work. They were authorized to go ahead with the paint on the
McCarty building as well.
a.
b.
SchliefHouse - Closed on Contract for Deed on June 19,2001.
TIF Dist. No. 1-12 (Aroplax) - Payment received on TfF loan with City.
225 Front Street - copy of appraisal for land only.
Integrated Recycling Technologies ~ closed on the project at the 2151 Century
Bank in Rogers on June 29, 2001.
Red Wing Foods - Koropchak stated her understanding that the company has
elected not to purchase the H- Window or Fay Mar building.
EDMA Corporation - small machine shop in Eden Prairie has purchased
agreement with Carl/Eric Bondhus for construction of a ] 0,000 sq. ft. building. 3
ne\>v johs to Monticello. Prospect team visited company.
Production Stamping - is still holding ofT to see how economy is.
International Cup - Lead from Ron Hoglund, referred to Fay Mar building for
c.
d.
e.
1'.
<1
O.
h.
5
.
.
.
9.
10.
EOA Minutes - 07/19/01
I.
lease or sale. Company decided Monticello was too far out.
Industrial Molded Rubber - Plymouth light rubber coating mfg. Lead from Xcel
Energy. Decision on hold.
Quick TIF 2000 is here so will begin working on that.
Tax increment for first half of 200 I available but have questions of the county.
Notification of Fay Mar MACA penalty - upon receiving TI, it may be beneficial
to payoff debt and decertify district.
Previous St. Henry's site - it appears the concept present by John Komarek is not
materializing as Tom St. Hilaire is presenting a new concept to the Planning
Commission.
Marketing Committee meeting July 26 at 7:30 a.m.
LEAD - 60,000 sq ft building - Olson General Contractors. Company is located
in a community that may not re-zone property for this company to expand; if not
they will have to look elsewhere.
HRA - looking at increasing wages. Checking on other cities at this time.
J.
k.
1.
m.
n.
o.
p.
Other Business. None
Ad i ournment.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY RON HOGLUND AND SECONDED BY CLINT
HERBST TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 5:30 PM. Motion carried.
Recorder
6
.
.
.
EDA Agenda - 8/21/01
4.
Consideration to hear of the interest of Block 35 propertv owners for revitalization
of rear-parking entry areas as presented by Consultant Grittman and authorization
to move forward.
A. Reference and Backeround:
At the July EDA meeting, the commissioners were presented with two options for
revitalization of the rear-parking area of the northerly half of Block 35 including common
trash containers. Mr. Grittman had Inet with AI Loch and Marn Flicker who voiced
concerns about drainage problems from roof run-oft~ the trash containers in public
parking lot appeared too br away for practical use, and did not care for the plaza concept
and suggested painting the parking areas. As some commissioners did not favor painting
the parking area, it was suggested Grittman research an alternative. Two cost estimates
were presented: First, with no concrete sidewalk or curb - approximately $50,000.
Secondly, with concrete sidewalk and curb - approximately $75,000. The EDA
recomlnended Mr. Orittman meet with the property owners or tenants and the public
works department for additional input and to obtain a commitment from property owners
of interest to participate (to draft an agreement for participation and long-term
maintenance.) Based on the owner's consensus, the EDA agreed to provide a letter of
intent to work with the property owners [(11' revitalization of the rear-parking entry area of
Block 35 including common trash containers. Additionally, the EDA offered financial
assistance in the amoLlnt of 75% to 100% of the cost to develop.
Mr. Grittman will report to the EDA of his second meeting with the property
owners/tenants of 11l0ck 35. l1ased of those results, the FDA should be prepared to
authorize moving fiJrward and to define the next steps such as design and site plans.
Attached is the current balance of the DMRF.
B. Alternative Action:
I. A motion to authorize development of design and site plans for the revitalization
of the northerly half of 810ck 52 including rear-parking entry area and common
trash containers.
2. A motion to authorize other ...................
3. A motion to table any action.
4. Record - unable to obtain a consenSllS of interest to participate from property
owners and/or tenants.
F:DA Agenda - 8/21/01
.
c.
Recom mcndation:
I f property owners are committed to enhancing the rear area of their property with the
financial assistance of the EDA, the recommendation is alternative no. 1 or 2.
D. Supportinl! Data:
Current balance of the DMRF.
.
.
2
.
.
.
MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMI<~NT AUTHORITY
DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO REVITALIZA TION FUND
August 17,2001
Fund Balance, December 31, 1997
$199,000.00
Revenues
^ppropriations
TOTAL REVENU ES
o
$199,000.00
Expenditures
DMRF 10L Kathy Froslie, 2-6-98
S-31-98
DMRF 102, Steve Johnson
DMRF 103, Kathy Froslie, 2-6-98
DMRF 104, Rich Cline, 10-11-98
11-24-9S
DMRF 105. ^' Loch, 11-6-98
DMRF 106. Dan Olson. 7-27-98
DMRF 107, Steve Johnson
DMRF lOS, Bruce Ilammond 6-11-99
DMRF 109, Dorothy Topel 7-12-99
DMRF 110, Ileaton
DMRF Ill, IIamond 8-29-0 I committed
Loan 4-10-01 (5.5%,5-04)
Claybaugh 3-00
4-00
Legal (Loan document)
DMRF 112 Thickpenny S-O 1
DMRF 113 Chalnber of COInmerce committed
Permit and McCarty wall committed
TOTAL EXPENDITlJRES
$ 2,500.00
$ 2,500.00
$ 500.00
$ 2,394.13
$ 180.12
$ 2,610.00
$6,814.13
$ 5,411.80
$ 2,011.74
$ 9,500.00
$10,644.00
$ 810.50
$ 1,240.00
$ 200.00
$ 7,085.75
$ 2,365.57
$ 1,500.00
$ 58,267.74
Fund Balance, ^ugust I 7, 200 I
$140,732.26
.
5.
e)
t)
g)
. h)
i)
j)
k)
.
EDA Agenda - 8/21/01
Consideration of Executive Director's Report.
a) VisiCom, Inc. - Copy of letter and invoice to Mr. Hamond based of the EDA
motion of July 19,2001. No payment has been received.
b) Integrated Recycling Technologies, Inc. - GMEr No. 018 in the amount of
$72,500 closed (disbursed) on June 29, 2001. Building construction underway
along Fallon A venue. r nvoice for amortization schedule from Ehlers.
c) EDMA Company - Approved GMEF No. 019 in the amount of $30,000
anticipated to close on August 30 or 31,200 I. Building and site plans at city for
review. Copy of paid application fee.
d) GMEF No. 007 - Standard Iron. Rusty Oemeules has requested a letter of
satisbction for payment in full 1'()r this loan. Will write today. The EDA shared a
first position on the Horizontal Center with the County and the Initiative Fund.
The EDA loan was ballooned in seven years and the County and Initiative Fund
pay-otT is 10 years. The County and Initiative Fund could amend the UCC filing.
WI HA Company - Plans have been submitted to the city for a 16,000 sq n
addition to their existing 10,000 sq ft building.
H- Window - Two leads for this building.
Fay-Mar Building - Production Stamping took a second look. No room to
expand. I believe ray-Mar leases 2,500 sq ft in Big Lake.
Production Stamping taking a wait and see approach.
Red Wing Foods - May construct a 27,000 sq ft building. Undecided.
O'Connor house - Court hearing rescheduled from August 3 to September 19.
Block 36 - Working on TIF Agreement with Pluth tew Amoco site and O'Donnell
for attorney building. Joint parking agreement among property owners for
northerly block, construction by Mike Cyr. City sold lot to Fluth.
I) DMRF No. 112 - Mr. Thickpenny submitted invoices and evidence of payment on
August 16. I will review and authorize reimbursement to Thickpenny upon
written review by DA T for completion of design as approved.
August 6, 2001
MONTICELW
VisiCom, Inc.
Bruce and Cynthia Hamond
P. O. Box 488
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Bruce and Cindy:
At the Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) meeting of July 19,2001; the
commissioners approved an annual payment of principal and interest for DMRF Loan No. 111
between the EDA and VisCom, Inc. This resulted hom your request to make one payment
annually.
.
Attached is an invoice in the amount of $1 ,389.36 for the principal and interest due for the period
June 1, 2001 through May 31, 2002. Please submit the payment due to the Monticello EDA,
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362. Also attached is your check No. 3418 dated
June 22, 2001 in the amount 01'$100 for interest only.
Your next annual principal and interest payment will be due June 1, 2002. Should you have any
questions, please call me at 763-271-3208.
Sincerely,
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
(:)~ \~~v,-.9~
Ollie Koropchak
Executive Director
c:
DMRF No. 111 File
Kevin Doty, First Minnesota Bank ~
.
S 0-'1
Monticello City BalI, 505 Walnut Street, Suite I, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 . (763) 295-2711 . Fax: (763) 295-4404
Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362. (763) 295-3170. Fax; (763) 271-3272
CITY OF MONTICELLO
505 W~lnut Street · Suite 1
Monticello, MN
55362
[ DATE I NUMBER J
INVOICE 8/13/01 9086758
PAYMENT DUE 9/13/01
(1 % interest per month will be charged
after due date.)
Make checks payable to City of Monticello.
J ( CUSTOMER ACCOUNT 5858
Phone: (763) 295-2711
F~x: (763) 295-4404
CUSTOMER. ADDRESS
VISI COM INC
PO BOX 488
ATTN: BRUCE & CYNTHIA HAMOND
MONTICELLO MN 55362
Ct'. . :rl~.J'.
. 'Ii), J
TO ENSURE PROPER CREDIT,
PLEASE RETURN PINK COpy
WITH PAYMENT
DHRF LOAN III ANNUAL PRINCIPAL
6/1/01 - 5/31/02
250.10101.18601
820.95
XAGRE-EDA
DHRF LOAN 111 ANNUAL INTEREST
6/1/01 - 5/31/02
250.10101.36601
568.41
XAGRE-EDA
.
TOTAL
1,389.36
.
~~)
.
Monticello HRA
505 Walnut Avenue, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
August 10, 2001
MC100-01
Invoice # 18637
GENERAL
Professional Services
7/11/01 MTR
MTR
MTR
~OA -7/15/01 MTR
7/23/01 MTR
7/25/01 MTR
7/26/01 MTR
MTR
\ ~ \ 9G
~o .
u."*
")'~ . ~\ .~\~q
Meeting and HRA meeting ..... .", ~ . ~ v 17
Run numbers for scattered sit~ housin!L- --.a u ~ S g "2.. "'?\ q 0
Run numbers for Walnut housing '::l'"'3. ~ ~ ~ . '"\
Amortization - Recycling tech loan ';). ':i 0 . ""~ 'S e \. '?J' ~ l:\
Meeting with Hans Hagen ? \ ~. '-l \.. ~ go "3. . ~ I q'fJt
Work on payg and loans update "'<Q"" (s _. -.A. '1. \ '!1. "-\ <. ""I> b I . 10 { q- <r
Rerun Amoco '1' J:~ \. ? ~
Finish runs/PA YG updates ..... \-\ (1... ~ ~ aJ-
~\~. 4ta~o\. 'b\C\9
Total Due This Month:
Status of Account:
.
Current
$1,187.50
30 Days
$0.00
60 Days
$0.00
90 Days
$0.00
Hours Amount
3.00 375.00
0.50 62.50
0.50 62.50
1.00 125.00
1.00 125.00
1.25 156.25
0.50 62.50
1.75 218.75
9.50 $1,187.50
120+ Days
$0.00
Total
$1,187.50
PLEASE KEEP WHITE COPY FOR YOUR FILE AND REMIT PINK COPY WITH PA YMENT TO:
.
.
EHLERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
3060 Centre Pointe Drive
Roseville, MN 55113-1105
651.697.8500
s ~')
.
.
.
G,W\e~
Nt)
O\~
s.\)'\\\~ ~~~ Lo~
o
rl
LO
...;;f
--
')
\''\
~ \
;;:: ~
~~ UJ
~ ~
o
z ~
~ ill
(j) n
Z ~
CJ.l '"
>--, '" lf1
Z~<J\
CJ.l1; iJ..l
~".,>
.....J~2
.....J "';' Cl
o u;<fJ
U r.;\s:i;s
~~~f.R
o ~jj
~~i:~
U t-;-r.<; ,
~~~~
L... "'......<fJ
;;r: 0......1<
".,nS:I:
~~I(')U
.~ J :.
-~\( ',1H
cG
D '"
;::) ",;
-<:
r<", -'
...J
0
tA- 0
,~ !
~:
~
~i
'~i
~: 0
\ ~, -
,'1 IJ1
~ J
":\
". ~
.~ -
'- -
.~ 1 -
~ \:t t.l]
I~ -
0
n.J
J ..
.... cO
'"
~~,o ['-
0 ~~~ r1"'I
~ 1I5- t.l]
-,,-gj J., -
h~ ...:::
R ~~ c-- [j
",; \ :;:~ It
Cl ~~,~ ~ -
~~ "' 0 [j
"'w =C ::;. 0
~~ w
p... r-< ' ;;::. . .
.'
1I'/")I1.I,vl 'I') I lll'lr^ 1~1I1~] ,}
\
CVuu
S Q..)