Loading...
EDA Agenda 04-20-2004 . 1. 2. 3. 4. . 5. AGENDA MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Tuesday, April 20, 2004 - 4:00 p.m. City Hall - Academy Room MEMBERS: Chair Bill Demeules, Vice Chair Barb Schwientck, Roger Carlson, Robbie Smith, Clint Herbst, Ron Hoglund, and Darrin Lahr. STAFF: Treasurer Rick Wolfsteller, Executive Director Ollie Koropchak, Recorder Angela Schumann. GUESTS: Mike PudiI, President, and/or Paul Sheely, Vice President, WSI Industries, Inc. Call to Order. Consideration to approve the January 27,2004 EDA minutes. Consideration of adding or removing agenda items. Consideration to review for discussion the preliminary GMEF application from WSllndustries, Inc. Public Hearing - Consideration to approve or deny GMEF Loan No. 023, a business subsidy, for WSI Industries, Inc. 6. Executive Director's Report. 7. Other Business. 8. Adjournment. . . . . MI NUTES MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Tuesday, January 27th, 2004- 4:00 p.m. Academy Room Members Present: Chair Bill Demeules, Roger Carlson, Clint Herhst, Assistant Trcasurer Ron IlogIund, Darrin Lahr, Robbie Smith Absent: Barb Schwientek Staff Present: Executive Director Ollie Koropchak, Treasurer Rick Wolfsteller, Public Works Director John Simola, and Recorder Angela Schumann Guests: Property owners Alan Loch, Dar Flatten, Karen Schneider, Pam Campbell - DA T, Shiela Stumpf - Proposcd DA T, Marie Flicker - Chamber of Commerce 1. Call to Order. Chair Demueles called the mccting to order at 4:00 p.m. and dcclared a quorum. 2. Consideration to approvc Octohcr 29, 2003 EDA minutes. A MOTION WAS MADE BY HOGLUND TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 2i'\ 2003 EDA MEETING. SMITH SECONDED THE MOTION. HERBST ABSTAINED DUE TO ABSENCE AT SAID MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. 3. Consideration of adding or removing items from thc agenda. None. 4. Consideration to hear from land owners of Block 35 and to determine ifproposed design conccpt meets EDA criteria. Al Loch spoke on behalf on Block 35 landowncrs, providing an update on activity since the last mceting of the EDA. All EDA members receivcd copies of the information prcsented at the July mecting fiJr referencc, including critcria. Thcre were questions at the October meeting regarding whether Block 35 landowners could meet the EDA's criteria and what the next stcps in thc process would bc. Loch has facilitated mcctings with landowners rcgarding the project and meeting the critcria. Loch indicated that landowners were committed to the proposed design, although they would like clarification on some the rcquired criteria. EDA Minutes - 01/27/04 . All property owners have committed to improving building facades via the addition of awnings. Fred Patch has reviewed the fayade improvements as has found nothing out-of.. like.. This requirement rcpresents the largest sharc of criteria commitment. Loch noted that the maintenance agreement requires unrestricted parking space, coordinated trash and snowplowing services, improved landscaping, as well as an agreement recorded against all properties. Loch indicated that property owners can meet snowplowing and common trash requircments. He reported that landscaping has not been discussed due to lack of a final design plan. . Loch rcquested that the EDA define unrestrictcd parking. He stated that there are pre- existing parking agreements with renters. Koropchak noted that the utilization of public dollars to improve the allcy and plaza may require that private parking be open to public (non-restrictive). Lahr indicated that this condition is negotiable. There may bc an option to incorporate pre-existing rental contracts. Karcn Schncider indicated that there is a great deal of concern over giving up private space due to current parking limitations. The EDA did note the recommended plan prepared by Steve Grittman would increase the amount of parking; there are currently only 29 parking spaces available on the site. Koropchak indicated that definition could be made between parking and loading zones in order to retain specified private spaces. Schneider feels that properties need ahility to claim a certain amount of private spaces for feasibility of the project. No dedicated parking may be a hardship. Chair Demueles asked property owners if that condition were removed. did they have any other problems meeting criteria? The property owners present indicated not. Loch proposed a compromise of "designated loading areas". Chair Demueles asked if the HRA has set a precedent for public/private parking on Block 36'1 Lahr suggested that perhaps there may he a diner-ent allocation of funds. Loch also questioned what was meant by the agreement being recorded against each property. Koropchak statcd that the recording is intcnded to reinforce upholding ofthe maintenance agreement. Recording agai nst the property allows the agreement to carry over to each renter and property owner. Loch inquired about the guarantee requirement for the low-interest loan agreement with EDA. Koropchak noted that the EDA may consider a low..interest loan for fa<;ade improvements, with special consideration given to corner block properties. If a loan is given, a guarantee is required. [,och noted that Craig Simonson has drafted a contract, acknowledging that all work will be done at the same time. Loch inquired what the next step in the process would be. Is financing available? Koropchak indicated that information on improvement costs is still needed from property owners and that the EDA still needs to determine funding considerations: public/private ratio and public purpose. . Loch and property owners also discussed the roof water and drainage issue. Schluender Construction has been asked to evaluate properties and provide and estimate. John Simola will also work with properties to provide other recommendations. Schneider inquired whether the improvements would adjust the public/private funding ratio. Koropchak stated that it most likely would. 2 . . . EDA Minutes - 01/27/04 Chair Demueles outlined thc next steps in the process: · Steve Grittman will prepare a final site plan (to scale) incorporating parking recommendations/adjustments, agreed-upon building fayade improvements and landscaping detail. . Property owners to provide building fayade improvement costs. . Property owners to review plan with DA T to gain approval on structure and materials. . City Administrator Wolfsteller indicated that the EDA should determine a ratio of public to private investment, and adjust ratio accordingly in terms of parking considerations. . A formal, binding agreement will be put together upon plan finalization and will need to be presented to the EDA. EDA to provide direction on length of contract. If the City is to provide funding, the commitment needs to be long term, meet criteria while still providing f1exibility, and bind all current and new property owners. In the casc of redevelopmcnt, pro-ratcd amount that needs to be paid back to the city over the contract period. . A covenant may require all property owncrs to agrce to replace and maintain improvements. Loch inquired whether landscaping would be included in agreement? Pam Campbell indicated that it will be addressed in DA T. Property owners will only be required to maintain the landscaping recommcnded by DAT. Landscaping requirements may not be as significant as large trees, etc. Loch indicated that property owners to move forward on the above items within the next month and will have proposal and plan ready t(H April meeting. Koropchak noted that the EDA must consider the following question: if public funding is used, were desired fayade improvements achieved? 5. Consideration of a request from Aroplax Corporation to extend the balloon payment date for GMEF No. 16. Korpochak provided the staff report, stating that Aroplax Corporation has inquired about extending balloon payment purely as an incentive in 2004. Currently, the loan would require refinancing in December. Koropchak statcd that current EDA bylaws do not allow for extensions. llerhst expressed his opinion that the extension may be an opp0J1unity for the city to demonstrate interest in promoting a pro..business climate. Herbst noted that current EDA fund levels may allow the extension. He noted that if the City spends money to get new business it should also make efforts to retain them. Koropchak indicated that Aroplax did not specify an extension length. Lahr inquired what the current interest rate on the loan is. Koropchak stated that the current rate is 6.25% interest rate. Lahr asked if the principal is needed for another project at this point? Koropchak noted that current cash now is good. Lahr noted that if the City extends the loan life, it will continue to earn interest. I lerbst suggested extending the loan period one time pending fund availability 3 . . . EDA Minutes - 01/27/04 and that the current loan is in good standing. Lahr asked whether another loan program is available to Aroplax. Koropchack stated there is not and that an extension would require changing the bylaws. The FDA briefly discussed making the extension callable. FDA directed staff to explore any legal ramifications of the extension and bylaw change. Report on this item at the next meeting and communicate with Aroplex on EDA' s consideration of the matter. Members agreed to table to next meeting. 6. Executive Director's Report. Koropchak outlined the JOBZ program, a newly designated tax-free zone program, noting that it may impact where businesses chose to locate/start their new company. Koropchak indicated that the program will affect the City's marketing strategy. H- Window Building has a user/renter and thcre is possible interest in the Remmele building from a production company. Wolfsteller indicated that a new busincss in the Remmele building would not be assessed for the interchange project as it is too far away from interchange for assessment. None of the City's eurrent models go that far in assessments. 7. Other Husiness. The Tuesday, April 27, 2004 EDA Annual Meeting was noted. 8. Adjournment. A MOTION WAS MADE TO ADJOURN AT 5:45 PM BY LAHR, SECONDED BY SMITH. MOTION CARRIED. Angela Schumann, Recorder 4 . . . EDA Agenda - 04/20/04 4. Consideration to review for discussion the preliminarv GMEF application from WSI Industries, Inc. A. Reference and Backl!round: GMEF Loan Application: See Attachment A. Request is for a $350,000 real property acquisition and development loan. Project Summary: WSI Industries, Inc. is a public held company. Thc company does precision machining and assemblies specializing in avionics and aerospace, computer, defensc, powcr systems, medical, etc. Corporate awards and recognition include Rockwell Collins, IBM, BFG Aerospace, Polaris Industries, and Raytheon. WSI was established in 1950. Taurus Numcric Tool, a Division of WSI, currcntly resides and leases space in Osseo, MN. WSI has a Purchase Agreement on the vacant manufacturing building located at 213 Chelsea Road (former 49,000 sq ft Remmele building.) The company has out~grown its facility in Osseo and plans to move into thc Monticello facility over the next six months. The closing date is anticipated the first week in May. See Attachment B. Projected job and wage goals. See Attachment C. Letter of Commitment from Dan Poppe, Excel Bank. Mike Pudil is President, CEO and Paul Sheely is Vice President, CFO. Mr. Pudil has ties to Monticello as he was Vice President of Remmele Engineering when Remmele builtin Monticcllo around 1990. So he's familiar with the building as well as myself and many ofthc manufacturing owners of Monticello. He served on the Board of Directors for UMC and resigned when he became President of WSI. The FDA should review the preliminary application for compliance with the EDA~GMEF Business Subsidy Criteria. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS: Real Estate Acquisition TOTAL $1,900,000 $1,900,000 . . . EDA Agenda - 04/20/04 GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND GUIDELINES PUBLIC PURPOSE CRITERIA: Must comply with four or more of the criteria listed below, criteria #1 bcing mandatory. 1. Job Goal: 46 full-time jobs to the City of Monticcllo within two years of the benefit datc. Wage Goal: At least 90% of the ncwjobs must pay a wage of the higher of$9.00 per hour, or at least 160% of the federal minimum wage, cxclusive of benefits, for individuals over the age of 20 during the term of the assistancc. See Attaehmcnt B. Annual reports are requircd until termination date. Failurc to meet job and wage goals require partial or full payment of the assistance plus interest. 2. Increascs thc community tax base: Occupics a vacant building and retains the $1,914,000 - 2004 Estimatcd Market Value. 3. Factors: 'fa assist a new manufacturing business to expand thcir operations. Other factors for consideration but no limited to: Naturc of business (manufacturing), potential adversc environmental cffcct (none), and compatibility to thc comprehensive plan and zoning policy (ycs, acccptable in 1-1 zone.) 4. Used as a sccondary source to supplement conventional financing. The GMEF is a secondary source of financing for the real estate. 5. Used as gap financing Used to encouragc growth and job creation within Monticello. 6. Used to assist other funds: Primary convcntionallender. GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND POLICIES I. BUSINESS ELIGIBILITY Industrial business: Yes. 2 . . . IV. EDA Agenda - 04/20/04 Located within city limits: Yes, Zoned I-I. Credit worthy existing business: Yes, Sce Exhibit C. $10,000 loan per each job created. $10,000 X 46 = $460,000. Or $5,000 per every $20,000 increase in property market valuation, whichever is higher. Criteria: $460,000 II. FINANCING METHOD: Companion Oireet Loan: All such loans may be subordinated to the primary lender if requested by the primary lender. The GMEF is leveraged and the lower interest rate of the GMEF lowers the effective interest rate on the entire project. Criteria: The GMEF takes a second position on the real estate mortgage. III. USES OF PROCEEDS: Real property acquisition and development. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: Loan Size: Maximum not to exceed 50% of the remaining revolving loan fund balance. Cash balance as of April I ,2004, estimated $750,000. Request: $350,000. Criteria: $375,000. Recommended: $350,000. Remaining balance thereafter, $400,000. Leveraging: Minimum 60% private/public non-GMEF Maximum 30% public (GMEF) Minimum 10% equity of ED A loan Proposed Lender GMEF Eq ui ty TO"rAL $1,360,000 (71.5%) $ 350,000 (18.4%) $ 190,000 (10%) (54% to EDA) $1,900,000 (99.9%) 3 . EDA Agenda - 04/20/04 Loan Term; Real estate property maximum of 5-year maturity amortized up to 30 years. Balloon payment at 5 years. Recommended: Amortization consistent with lender, 25 years. Balloon payment in year 5. Interest Rate; Fixed rate not less than 2% below Minneapolis prime rate. Prime rate per National Bank of Minneapolis on date of EDA loan approval. Prime rate April 20, 2004. _' Recommendation at meeting: fixed rate. Loan Fee: Minimlilll fee of $200 but not to exceed 1.5% of the total loan project. Paid by applicant to the EDA within five working days after City Council approval of GMEF loan. Non-refundable. Loan fee may be incorporated into project costs. EDA retains the right to reduce or waive loan fee or portion of loan fee. Options: Minimum fee of $200 or not to exceed 1.5% of GMEF loan ($5,250), due and payable not later than April 30, 2004. . Recommended: Minimum fee of $200, due and payable not later than April 30, 2004. Prcpayment Policy: No penalty for prepayment. Deferral of Payments; 1. Approval of the EDA membership by majority vote. 2. Extend the balloon if unable to refinance, verification letter trom two lending institutions subject to Board approval. Late Payment Policy: Failure to pay principal or interest when due may result in the loan being immediately called. Interest limitation on guarantced 10anWot applicable. Assumability of loan; Nonc. Business equity requircments:Subject to type of loan; Board of Directors will determine case by case, analysis under normal lending guidelines. . 4 EDA Agenda - 04/20/04 . Collateral: Personal and/or corporate guarantees (requires unlimited personal guarantees) as per the GMEF attorney. As this is a public held company, no personal guarantees will be requested. NC)I1-performance: An approved GMEF loan shall be null and void iffunds are not drawn upon or disbursed within 180 days from datc of EDA approval. April 20, 2004 EDA approval - loan becomes null and void October 20, 2004. Non-performance extension: Not applicable. Legal Fees: Responsibility of the GMEF applicant. B. Recommendation: . Recommendation is to review this information prior to thc EDA meeting for discussion and potential questions. Consideration to approve or deny GMEF Loan No. 023 is the next agenda item. c. Supporting Data: Preliminary GMEF application, job and wage-level goals, Excel Bank Letter of Commitment, and a portion of the Jinancials. Annual Report Fiscal 2003 (2002 and 2003) and quarterly February 2004 available at EDA meeting. Also on file is a copy of the Purchase Agreement, Article of Incorporation, Certificate of (rood Standing. . 5 03/29/2004 15:19 ..,~ ..I.~.,. ,,,--.,y., ",__. 7534284300 TAURUS NUMERIC TOOL PAGE 02 ~~O&lr . . . GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND 505 wALNUT SlREET, SUITE 1 MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY APPliCATION FOR LOAN APPLICANT: \IJ S~ :rN D\) S,....\t!5.s. $.~ c:.. FIRM OR TRADE NAME: BUSINESS ADDRESS: 1'8\'5>\ ~~~ ..0 CITY/STATE: D'Sseo /fI\N ZIP CODE: 5~3(.q TELEPHONE: (BUS) '7&"....,nt .....,'SO& (HOME) DATE EST ABLlSHED: I CfSO EMPLOYER IDN "'" - Ow'? I (.f:) 7 SOLE PROPRIETOR -2L CORPORATION _ PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT NAME M \...:.~ - AJ^''P/ .p~ .s~...L..,'1" TITLE {. N.e$ GIII.O \J P/ i:.I=O OWNERSHIP % - PROJECT LOCATION: .z,,, C'ieL-~.e.c> Mo..a,.,c.FI' 0 )C NEW LOCA nON )( EXISTING BUSINESS TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE: S I, qoo I 000 PROPOSED USES: REOUEST: AMOUNT OF LOAN $ ~ ClIClO MATURITY & TERMS REQUESTED 5 VI( ~...a APPLICANT'S EQtnTY ..1)-c:er ~~ LOAN PURPOSE At -.pl. IT. o,..a 0 F LAND EXISTING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CAPITAL WORKING CAPITAL OTHER TOTAL USES: $ \ '1or:? COD PROPOSED BEGINNING DATE: ~t$lo'" ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: ' 61S/o'" I TITLE TO PROJECT ASSETS TO BE HELD BY: 15- OPERATING ENTIT"'y"- ALTER EGO PARTICIPATING LENDER: e)(~i. &ANa-::.. $0 So""TH $''''1"#+ SI M,NA.l6'IP<<Js '" 1J l> (Name) (Address) , ftttJ PoEfe- ~ :t38 -2P~'7 (Contact Person) (Telephone #) 'PRESENT # OF'IT EMPLOYEES ~lt? PROJECTED # OF FT EMPLOYEES (within 2 years) 50 PROJECTED AVERAGE WAGE PER HOUR: ,,,. Q:) ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFORMATION: APPLICANT SIGNATURE: iiI? DATE SIGNED: :J /ZlljO,,/ -PJ O. .s.g vJS;s:. ~O\1 S"1<<, ';'5 _ r f:\oll iek\oll ie\wordoroc\edaa2endas. G MEForelimA 00. frm 03/29/2004 15:19 7534284300 l.~! ':/i1!ldf.l il"~iIiI!IIID:~,i,;ljjIlIllllftjH-1 ..~ r- .- TAURUS NUMERIC TOOL ~E .3 ~o.~ .~ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Economic Development Director Phone: Fax: Email: (763) 271-3208 (763) 295-4404 011 ie. koroncbakri/:c i. mOil lice tlo-Illll _ us CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA ~ JOB AND WAGE LEVEL - EXISTING JOBS ~ Please indicate number of current employees at each level and indicate the corresponding benefit level. Number of Jobs Hourly Wa'i!..e Level Hourly Value of V oluntarv Benefits ($) <:&..S1'"t""'i\oT&.1:)) Full-time Part-time (Exc\. benefits) .-- Less than $7.00 $7.00 to $7.99 $8.00 to $9.99 $10.00 to $1 1.99 ) II 5 . 1 I JiL $]2.00 to $13.99 fI ,. So $ 3. C,b " 3. "8 , :1. 7(0 oI~~ ., "'I. OC> $14.00 to $15.99 $16.00 to $17.99 $18.00 [0 $19.99 $20.00 to $21.99 $22.00 and higher ~~ . JOBSWAGE.2004 Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite I, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 . (763) 295-2711 . Fax: (763) 295-4404 Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362. (763) 295-3170. Fax: (763) 271-3272 A p r, 14. 2004 11: 18 AM . EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No. 2079 P. 9/22 Coverage Analysis based on market rents: Office 12.000 sf @ $6.00 psf (net) Manufacturing 37,000 sf @ $3.00 psf (net) Market Rents DSR (20 yr amort.l5.2%) DSCR ~ $ 72,000 ;'ll $111.000 $183,000 $123.000 1.49x Proiect Analvsis WSllndustries, Inc. currenUy leases their production facility located in Osseo. Minnesota that houses its production and Is also its headquarters. The facility is approximately 28.000 square feet and is leased until February 2004 with an option to renew for an additional year. The Company has renewed the lease for another year, to February 2005, This will allow them to continue production and gradually move into the new facility. They are scheduled to close on the new facility May 1, 2004. Monthly rent Is approximately $9,600 plus operating expenses and taxes. In addition, the company also leases a storage facility under an operating lease that expires in July 2004. with monthly rent of $2,013. The company will not renew the lease on the storage facility when it expires In July. The company plans to relocate its headquarters and production facility to the proposed location. The new facility Is located in Monticello, MN. Property Data: Property Address: Sources and Uses of Funds Option 1 (Bank financing only) Sources: Bank Loan Cash Equity (20%) Total Sources . Year Bui~: Total Square Feet: Lot Size: Parking: Location: 213 Chelsea Road Monticello. MN 1990 with addition in 1996 Office 12,000 sf Production 37.000 sf Total 49,000 sf 9.4 acres Asphalt lot, lighted, space for approximately 150 vehicles Excellent exposure and aceess to 1-94 via Highway 25 exit $1.520.000 380.000 $1,900.000 Uses: Purchase Price $1,900,000 T etal Uses $1,900,000 Option 2 (Bank financing and subordinate financing from the City of Monticello) Sources: Uses: Bank Loan (1S1 REM) $1,360,000 Purchase prtce $1.900,000 City Monticello (2nd REM) 350.000 Cash Equity (10%) 190,000 Total Sources $1,900,000 Total Uses $1.900,000 . Guarantor Analvsis Nla 8 Apr. 14. 200411:18AM EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No. 2079 p, 10/22 . Overall Risk Analvsis The company has been in business for over fifty years and has survived both macro and micro challenges over time. Strengths - Strong proactive manaaement Long time in business Strong balance sheet, leverage 0.60x with $900M In liquidity as FYE 8-31.03; and for the 6-month period ending 2-29.04 leverage is O.54x with $1.2M In liquidity. Improved profitability. The company was able to return to profitability during FY 2003 as a resutt of improved margins and exiting low margin business. Strong coverage ratios as of: 6-months endinQ FYI: 8-31-03 2-29-04 EBITDA/lnterest Expense 10.45x 16.16x EBITDAlCML TO 1.76x 5,1 Ox (annualIZed ESITDA) Total DebtlEBITDA 1.38x 1.63x (annllIIIzedEBITDA) - Sufficient historical and pnrforma cash flow to support the companies existing debt service requirements and the proposed mortgage. Six.month annualized EBITDA, less annualized dividends. provides a 1.58x coverage; pro-forma 2004 EBITDA provides a 1.21 x coverage (this includes the borrower carrying both facilities during FY 2004); and pro-fonna 2005 EBITDA provides for a 3.29x coverage (this includes six- months of carrying both facilities until the old lease expires in February 2005). . Weaknesses and MitigatolS _ Concentrations within industry segments and with individual customers (Polaris Industries (73%) and Rockwell Collins (10%)). Payment risk is mitigated by the financial strength of both customers. Polaris has reported sales growth for the nine-month period ending 9-30-03 on the two product lines (A TV and Victory motorcycle) in which WSI manufactures parts for. Polaris has been in business for almost 50 years and Rockwell for 70 years. The loss of revenue risk, associated with the concentrations, in the event Poiaris or Rockwell took their business elsewhere is mitigated, for the RVeR. by the asset-based loan stNcture. This risk Is mitigated for both the RVeR and the term debt by the recent new business awarded to the company by Polaris (S4.5MM in revenue for FY 2005), and the concentration with Rockwell decreasing to 5% In FY 2004 and 6:4% In FY 2005, Non-recourse facility Company will be carrying two facilities (Osseo and Monticello) until February 2005. Mitigated by the company's pro fonna cash flow which shows sufficient cash flow to service both debt service requirements on the new facility and lease payments on the existing facility. Six-month annualized EBITDA, less annuailzed dividends, provides a 1.58x coverage; pro-forma 2004 EBITDA provides a 1.21x coverage (this includes the borrower carrying both facilities during FY 2004); and pro-fonna 2005 EBITDA provides for a 3.29x coverage (this Includes six-months of carrying both facilities until the old lease expires in February 2005). Outstandina Documentation or Recortina Excectlons None Leaa' Counsel Todd Iliff . Participation Nla 9 I I I I I A p r. 14. 2004 11: 19 AM EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No.2079 P. 11/22 -. - Analvst Recommendation Relationshio Manaaer Recommendation ",/ ~ n"i L(. i '/. .-1 II resident Chances} Additional Reauirements: Attachments: -Historical Financial Statement Spreads .profQnna Financial Statement Spreads -WSI Jndustries, Inc Credit Display dated 12.11..Q3 . . 10 03/29/2004 16:19 7634284300 - I .'~::::".".~Lllt.I"; '.......""...:.;,i.~~._ M'___Y .'/ -- TAURUS NUMERIC TOOL PAGE 04 i ~. . . ~ w . . AUTHORIZATION RELEASING INFORMATION TO: EExt' PI- &N \:::- Name of Financial Institution So So~n+ ~J X11-t ..:s't Street (VI /NiVeJtf/ot.-I 5 City #ltJ State ~..yo Z- Zip . I hereby authorize any person to furnish to the Monticello Economic Development Authority, 250 East Broadway, PO Box 1147, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, any and all financial records, reports, statements, or other documentation or information in their possession regarding: wss:. ~~~'t$.S :p..1L Developer's name(s) \ g lS \ "TE'?J211Of1.L- I<.b Developer's address o sseo /V1 tJ . 95;.J1.9 Upon presentation of this authorization or an exact copy thereof, you are directed to permit the personal review, copying, or photostating of such records, information, and evidence and provide same to the Monticello Economic Development Authority. I, the undersigned, acknowledge the said above information may become public. This authorization shall be valid the entire term of the loan. Dated: S/.ar(ort A>~. Wu: :;tNDvS,.ctce..s :::I)Jc:::.... /' ~ [J0l' . One copy for each principal of a partnership or corporation as well as the entity itself. Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362.8831. (763) 295-2711 · Fax: (763) 295-4404 Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362. (763) 295-3170' Fax: (763) 271-3272 ~ "Excellence in Machining, Assembly & Manufacturing Technologies. . . Since 1950" TAURUS DIVI.S.ION Supplier of the Year Certified Supplier Certified Supplier STAR Program Supplier Qualified Supplier From Taurus' beginning in 1977, we have built our business and reputation on producing high quality parts and assemblies, delivered on time, for a competitive price. We Specialize in the Following Distinct Industries . Avionics & Aerospace . Computer . Defense . Marine . Medical . Power Systems . Radar & Microwave Components . Specialized Equipment Corporate Awards & Recognition ~l Rockwell Collins IBM _ BFG Aerospace fi'-r-1 Polaris Industries Raytheon Overview of Tier One support & Services . Design, Prototype, Pre-production & Production . Tooling & Fixture Design and Build . Batch, Repetitive Batch & Continuous Run Production . Stand Alone Machines, Flexible Cells, Dedicated Cells & High Speed FMS System . Continuous Process Optimization for Production Work Repetitive Work Stored "On Line" & Processed by a Robotically Accessed Pallet Rack System Servicing a Row of High Speed Machining Centers . Repetitive Set-up Virtually Eliminated . Flexible Scheduling . "lights Out" Manufacturing High Speed Spindles . High Removal Rates . Economical "Hog Outs" . Superior Thin Wall Quality . ~, ..~ @ INDUSTRIES www.wsiindustries.com TAURUS NlJMER1C TOOL 18151 Territorial Road. Osseo, MN 55369 · TEL: (763) 428-4308 · FAX: (763) 428-4300 @2002 WSI Industries. All Rights Reserved. All Trademarks are property of their respective companies. Printed in the USA. " AVIONICS, AEROSPACE & DEFENSE "Excellence in Machining, Assembly & Manufacturing Technologies. . . Since 1950" -. !~~!!~~o ~~!s!~~tense Matkets Capabilities · High Speed FMS System Provides Flexible Scheduling and Virtually No Set-up for Repetitive Work · Dedicated & Flexible Machining Cells · Thin Walls & Deep Cavities . Complex "Hog Outs" . Prototype "Hog Outs" · "Cockpit" Quality Aviation & Military Finishes · Surface Finish- Cosmetics, Aesthetics & Functionality . Assembly Operations WSI has been working in the avionics, aerospace & defense industries for almost 50 years. State-of-the-art equipment and manufacturing processes tailored to the requirements of the aerospace, avionics & defense markets, ensure we are able to manufacture parts in the optimum manner. This allows us to provide the highest quality part, delivered on time, for a competitive price. - I - -- @ INDUSTRIES www.wsiindustrieS.com TAURUS NUMERIC TOOL 18151 Territorial Road · Osseo, MN 55369. TEL: (763) 428-4308 · FAX: (763) 428-4300 i(!2002 WSI Industries. All Rights Reserved. All Trademarks are property of their respective cornp,mies. Printed In the lJSA. EQUIPMENT, FACil:.,ITIES & CAPABILITIES / ' "Excellence in Machining, Assembly & Manufacturing Technologies. . . Since 1950" · cat TAURUS DIVISION 18 Horizontal Machining Centers (1) Toyoda FH630 HMC (2) Mod Seiki MH40 HMC (4) Toyoda FA450111 (1) Mazak H400N HMC (4) Toyoda FH45 HMC (2) Okuma & Howa Millac 4H HMC (2) Mazak HTC400 HMC (1) Niigata PN40 HMC (1) Matsuura HMC600 High Speed Flexible Manufacturing System (FMS) Mazak FMS With 3 High Speed HMC's and Robotically Accessed Pallet System . 22 Vertical Machining Centers & Lathes (2) Hwacheon Sirius-2 H S VMC (2) Fadal VMC6030 (4) 25,000 RPM Micro Drilling (4) Fadal VMC4020 VMC (1) Okuma Howa Millac 4VA VMC (1) Mod Seiki MVJr (2) Chiron FZ12W (2) Bridgeport CNC Mill (2) Toyoda FV45 VMC (1) Methods Slant Jr (1) Miyano BND34 82, Bar Feed Capabilities Materials: Aluminum, brass, stainless steel & performance plastics. Quantities: Prototype (including limited dimension drawings), batch, repetitive batch & production Expertise: Avionics, aerospace, defense, microwave/radar & medical. Hogouts & castings. Assembly: Electro-mechanical & cryogenic. Enaineerinq: design, tooling, fixturing & process optimization. Size: Machining cube: 1" to 3' cube. - Quality Assurance (5) Brown & Sharp CMM (2) Sheffield RS30 CMM DCC (1) Mitutoyo CV500 w/Automatic Contour Measuring Engineering & Manufacturing Software PRO-E MasterCam CAD KEY E Business-Vantage . -- INDUSTRIES www.wsiindustries.com TAURUS NUMERIC TOOL 18151 Territorial Road. 08880, MN 55369. TEL: (763) 428-4308. FAX: (763) 428-4300 1CJ200? WSI Industries. All Rights Reserved. All Trademarks are property of their respective companies. Printed In the USA. . SHAREHOLDER LETTER WSI Industries FY2003 Annual Report To Our Shareholders: Two years ago we embarked on a radical strategic initiative to change the direction of WSI Industries, At that time we had three goals in mind; 1. To achieve profitability on a consistent basis. 2. To reduce our debt Structure and improve our financial condition. 3. To focus our efforts on the Taurus Numeric Tool Division which would provide a solid base for long term growth. Today, a little less than 2 years after we restructured the Company and changed it's,direction, we are pleased to report on our accomplishments. · Sales increased 28% over fiscal 2002 at the Taurus Division. · Profitable results were generated for a fifth consecutive quarter. · Gross Margin of 19.3% for fiscal 2003 was the highest in over 10 years. · Our Financial Condition has improved: Long-Term Debt reduced to $648,000 versus $4,111,000 of2 years ago. Debt to Equity ratio is down to 9% - its lowest level in almost 20 years. Net working capital at the end of fiscal 2003 was at $2,139,000 as compared to $1,179,000 at the end of fiscal 2002. This improvement was due in large measure to the Company generating $1,100,000 in cash in fiscal 2003, and using those funds to pay down debt. Current assets to current liabilities ratio improved to 2.89 to 1.0. Inventory was reduced by 21 % resulting in an annualized inventory turn of 13 times. . A further sign of WSI's strength and improved business outlook came this past June as the Board of Directors voted to reestablish the Company's dividend program - a program that had been dormant since 1991. Since June 2003, the Company has paid 2 quarterly dividends at an annualized rate of $.15 per share. It will be our objective to reward our shareholders with cash dividends as well as increasing share appreciation, while at the same time maintaining our strong fmancial position. Our initiatives have resulted in a stronger WSI. Today, we have the fmancial wherewithal to provide an opportunity for continued growth. Our actions have enabled us to focus all of WSI's resources on our Taurus Division whose sales grew 28% in FY 2003 despite the continued softness in the aerospace and avionics markets. Our vision going forward consists of a strategy of diversi:fYing our cUstomer base while also expanding our manufacturing capabilities to meet the increasingly global requirements of our business. We will accomplish this by placing a renewed emphasis on fmding customers in industries that are compatible with our core competencies. We will also continue to concentrate on improving our operations and fmding the most cost effective method of sourcing. Our strength comes from our employees who pride themselves on their dedication to serving the needs of our customers with innovative manufacturing process solutions. Without the commitment that our employees have, the positive results achieved would not have been possible. Once again, it has been demonstrated that our strongest asset is our organization consisting of excellent employees. Thank you! We look forward to a successful future and appreciate the continued support of our shareholders and valued customers. . Sincerely, '" d ~-,~ President & Chief Executive Officer ~" 'WSI INDUSTRIES, INC. . ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31,2003 INFORMATION REQUIRED IN REPORT PART I Item 1. Business WSI Industries, Inc. (the "Company") makes its periodic and current reports available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.wsci.com. Overview The Company was incorporated in Minnesota in 1950 for the purpose of performing precision contract machining for the aerospace, communication, and industrial markets. The maj or portion of Company revenues are derived from machining work for the aerospace/avionics industry and recreational vehicles markets. On February 15, 1999, the Company purchased Taurus Numeric Tool, Inc. ("Taurus"). Taurus is a precision contract machining company that sells primarily to the recreational vehicle and aerospace and avionics markets.. . On August 6, 1999, the Compauy purchased Bowman Tool & Machiniug, Inc. ("Bowman"). Bowman is a precision contract machining company serving the agriculture and construction industries. On February 22,2002, the Company completed the asset sale of Bowman Tool & Machining, Inc. to an affiliate of the prior owner. Contract manufacturing constitutes the Company's entire business. Products and Services The Company manufactures metal components in medium to high volumes requiring tolerances as close as one ten-thousandth (.0001) of an inch. These components are manufactured in accordance with customer specifications using materials generally purchased by the Company, but occasionally supplied by the customer. Sales and Marketing . The major markets served by the Company have changed in the past several years because of the Company's decision to sell the Bowman division in fiscal 2002 and concentrate its focus on its Taurus operation. Sales to the agricultural industry were 36% and 21 % of total Company sales in fiscal years 2001 and 2002, respectively. Sales to the recreational vehicle market totaled 12%, 37% and 74% in fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively. Sales to the aerospace/avionics/defense markets totaled 19%, 17% and 15% in fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Sales to the construction/power systems market totaled 19% and 10% in fiscal 2001 and 2002, respectively. With the sale of Bowman Tool assets described above, the Company is no longer in the agriculture or construction/power systems markets. 2 -~~\,,: . The Company has a reputation as a dependable supplier capable of meeting stringent specifications to produce quality components at high production rates. The Company has demonstrated an ability to develop sophisticated manufacturing processes and controls essential to produce precision and reliability in its products. Seasonality Seasonal patterns in the Company's business are reflections of the Company's customers seasonal patterns since the Company's business is that of a provider of manufacturing services. Customers Sales in excess of 10 percent of fiscal 2003 consolidated sales were made to Polaris Industries, Inc. and related entities in the amount of $8,034,000 or 74% of Company revenues. Backlog . Approximate dollar backlog at October 15,2003, August 25,2002 and August 26,2001 was $1,899,000, $2,634,000 and $13,108,000 respectively. Backlog is not deemed to be any more significant for the Company than for other companies engaged in similar businesses. The above backlog amounts are believed to be firm, and no appreciable amount of the backlog as of October 15,2003 is scheduled for delivery later than during the current fiscal year. The October 15, 2003 backlog date and the end of year August dates for 2002 and 2001 are believed to be comparable. Backlog continues to decrease from year to year as customer order schedules are tighter. The decrease in the level of backlog is not indicative of future yearly sale increases or decreases. In addition a significant portion of the decrease from 2001 to 2002 relates to the sale of the Bowman Tool assets, and the business that they corresponded to, as described in the overview section above. Competition Although there are a large number of companies engaged in machining, the Company believes the number of entities with the technical capability and capacity for producing products of the class and in the volumes manufactured by the Company is relatively smaIl. Competition is primarily based on product quality, service, timely delivery, and price. Research and Development; Intellectual Property No material amount has been spent on company-sponsored research and development activities. Patents and trademarks are not deemed significant to the Company. Employees At August 31, 2003, the Company had 40 employees, none of whom were subject to a union contract. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good. Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales . The Company has no operations in any foreign country. In 2003,2002 and 20tH, sales to companies in Mexico amounted to $693,000, $1,686,000 and $2,623,000, respectively. 3 Item 2. Properties . The Company leases a production facility located in Osseo, Minnesota that houses its production and is also its headquarters. The facility is approximately 28,000 square feet and is leased until February 2004 with an option to renew for an additional year. Monthly rent is approximately $9,600 plus operating expenses and taxes. The Company considers its manufacturing equipment, facilities, and other physical properties to be suitable and adequate to meet the requirements of its business. Item 3. Legal Proceedings The Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None. PART IT Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters The common stock of the Company is traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market System under the symbol "WSCI. " . As of November 10,2003 there were 521 shareholders of record of the Company's common stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales price information for our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Smal1Cap Market. Stock Price High Low FISCAL 2003: First quarter Second quarter Third quarter Fourth quarter $ 1.58 1.30 1.24 3.00 $ .60 .90 .99 1.15 FISCAL 2002: First quarter Second quarter Third quarter Fourth quarter $ 2.90 1.94 2.20 1.50 $ 1.00 .90 1.25 1.00 The Company announced a quarterly dividend program in June 2003 of$.0375 per share. The first . dividend was paid August 8, 2003. A second dividend of$.0375 per share was paid November 14,2003. 4 :~- WSIINDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2003, AUGUST 25, 2002 AND AUGUST 26, 2001 2003 2002 2001 Net sales (Note 9) $ 10,792,650 $ 12,948,068 $ 20,877,181 Cost of products sold 8.703.970 11.347 .924 17.022.938 Gross margin 2,088,680 1,600,144 3,854,243 Selling and administrative expense 1,511,458 1,750,883 4,228,849 Loss (gain) on sale of equipment and building 9,972 (123,279) Fair market value impairment of equipment 150,859 Loss on sale of subsidiary assets 2,505,919 Interest and other income (87,984) (27,838) (32,945) Interest expense 123.343 363.063 820.949 .- 1.556.789 4.592.027 5.044,433 ., Income (loss) before income taxes 531,891 (2,991,883) (1,190,190) Income tax expense (benefit) (Note 7) 178.522 (2.179.119) 3.000 Net income (loss) $ 353.362 $ (812.764) $ (1.193.190) Basic earnings (loss) per share $ .14 ~ (.33) $ ( .48) Diluted earnings (loss) per share ~ .14 $ (.33) $ C481 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 2.473.535 2.465.229 2.465.229 Weighted average number dilutive common shares outstanding 2.485 961 2 465.229 2.465 229 See notes to consolidated [mancia1 statements. . 18 . Part L Financial Information Item I. Financial Statements WSI INDUSTRIES, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS February 29, August 31, Assets ~ 2003 ( unaudited) Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,185,188 $ 891,218 Accounts receivable 1,272,207 1,530,811 Inventories 680,553 606,262 Prepaid and other current assets 55,037 75,747 Deferred tax assets 169.387 169.387 Total Current Assets 3,362,372 3.273.425 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 1.464,044 1. 718,599 Deferred tax assets 1. 750.290 1.813.270 Intangible assets, net 2.368.452 2.368.452 . $ 8.945.158 U.173.74~ LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities: Trade accounts payable Accrued compensation and employee withholdings Miscellaneous accrued expenses Current portion of long-term debt Total Current Liabilities $ 444,764 $ 403,277 291,985 384,857 145,215 150,289 203,551 195,720 1.085.515 1.134.143 544.236 648.008 Long term debt, net of current portion Stockholders' Equity: Common stock, par value $.10 a share; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2,553,629 shares and 2,551,129, respectively Capital in excess of par value Retained earnings Total Stockholders' Equity 255,363 1,829,84 I 5.230.203 7.315.407 $..8.945.158 255,113 1,826,901 5.309.581 7.391.595 $...9.173.746 See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements . 3 - WSI INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES - CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERA nONS (Unaudited) 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended February 29, February 23, February 29, February 23, 2004 2003 2004 2003 Net sales $ 2,615,666 $ 2,359,109 $ 5,421,727 $ 4,793,402 Cost of products sold 2,207.463 1.947.275 4,602.867 3,920.105 Gross margin 408,203 411,834 818,860 873,297 Selling and administrative expense 340,788 310,382 658,677 689,251 Interest and other income (30,334) (43,375) (45,779) (62,349) Interest and other expense 15,043 38,701 31 ,026 79.683 Earnings from operations before income taxes 82,706 106,126 174,936 166,712 Income tax expense 27.116 38,200 62,977 60,135 Net earnings $ 55.590 $- 67.926, L._U 1.959 $ 1 06.)1~ ..... -.-.. Basic earnings per share .$ .02 L.._. .03 ~....~,04 $ .04 Diluted earnings per share $ .02 $ .03 $ .._..M $ .04 Cash dividend per share $ .017..5. $ $ .075 $ Weighted average number of common shares 2.552.008 2.465.229 -.---25 51. 5 69 2.-465.22.2 Weighted average number of common and dilutive potential common shares 2.62~8..81 2..12.5.229 2.628.038 2.465.229 See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. . 4 Apr. 14. 200411:16AM EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No. 2079 P. 2/22 . COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE Date: April 14, 2004 .Relationship Manager: Natalia Armitage o-J,~ C. Customer Name: Address: WSllndustrles, Inc. 18151 Territorial Road Osseo, MN 55369 ;f' Risk Rating; 4A Purpose of Presentation: -Approve a new $1,520M eRE loan for acquisition financing on a 49,000 sf Industrial building located at 213 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN -Amend financial covenants -Cross default proposed facility w~h existing Revolving Credit facility Relationship: Existing customer Customer since: December 4, 2002 Project Location: 213 Chelsea Road Monticello, MN .., PropOsed Credit Borrower: WSllndustries, Inc. Amount Option 1: 51,520,000 Option 2: $1,360,000 (The company ;s currentiy wor1<lng with the City of Monticello to provide up to S350M, 3.25%, CRE loan secured by a 2nd REM on the subject property. In the event that the City of Monticello's 2nd REM financing Is provIded, the Borrower's equity in the project will be reduced from 20% to 10% and the Bank's loan amount will be reducecl from 80% of the purchase price to 72% of the purchase price) Loan Type: Ballooning commercial real estate term loan Term: 10 years Advance Formula: The lesser of i} 80% of the appraised value; or ii} 80% or the purchase price Cash Investment: Option 1: $380,000. (20% of purchase price) Option 2: $190.000. (10% of purchase price if the City of Monticello provides low interest rate subordinate financing described above) Amortization: 25 years Payment Requirement: Monthly payment will be a fixed principal and interest payment based on the loan rate and a 25 year amortization. JI Interest Rate: The 5-year US Treasury CMI index + 2.50% fixed for 5 years (currently at 5.20%) and re- priced at the then 5-year US Treasury CMI index + 2.50% for an addnional5 years. 0.50% (S8,400) First real estate mortgage and assignment of leases and rents on land and improvements located at 213 Chelsea Roael. Monticello. MN. N/a (Publicly traded company) " Acquisition financing on a 49,000 sf industrial building located at 213 Chelsea Ro~d, Monticello, MN. The borrower IS outgrown their existing facility in Osseo, MN. They plan to rslocate their headquarters and production operations to the proposed facility in Monticello, MN. Fee: Security: . Guaranty: Purpose: . I I i 1 ; I I Apr. 14. 200411:16AM EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No. 2079 P. 3/22 . Current Proposed Proposed Net commitment change commitment ParticiDations commItment WSI Industrlll. Inc. Proposed eRE loan $-().. $1.520.000 $1.520,000 $-O~ $1,520.000 Une of Credit (Note #200350) $1,000,000 ~- $1.000.000 $-0- $1 000000 ACH EXDosure (#201990\ $125.000 $-0- $125,000 $125,000 Total $1125.000 $1,520.000 $2,645,000 $-0- $2 645 000 Related Loans Nons $-0- $-0- $-0- $-0- $.0- Subiect to LLL" $1,000000 $1.520000 $2,520 000 $-0- $2,520,000 *ACH Exposure is not included in LLL Deposit Account Information: Acccunt# 200360 200370 200410 TOTAL Account Type Checking Checking Savings YTD Averace Collect Balances $ 393,248. $ 16,809. $1.097,216. 51.507,273. General Conditions: Appraisal; To be completed by J. Scott Renne Environmental: Phase I to be completed by Peer Environmental To be provided by Title Company satisfactory to the bank insuring the bank's priority lien position . Title: Inspection: Cash Investment: Officer site visit Lease Requirement: Option 1: $380,000. (20% of purchase price) Option 2: $190.000. (10% of purchase price if the City of Monticello provides the subordinate finanCing) Nla. OWner occupied building -Interest and principal to be billed monthly -Corporate accounts to be maintained at Excel Bank 1 % on annual principal reductions in excess of 10%. Annual audited financial statements (within 90 days) and monthly interim financial statements (within 30 days) Special Conditions: Pre-payment Penalty: Reporting: . 2 . A p r. 14. 2004 11: 16 AM EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No. 2079 P. 4/22 Covenants: With the building acquisition. we will add a minimum DSCR to the existing covenants. In addition, we will need to amend three of the exisijng covenants (Debt/TNW, Current Ratio and CAPEX) as outlined below to allow for the building acquisition. Covenant Measured: Existina Prooosecl Actual Actual Proforma Proforma Covenant Covenant ~ 2/29104 8131/04 8131105 l1ncludi/19 ~:~~ BJdi Acal Min.NW Quarterly S6,650M S6,650M $7,392M $7,315M S7,012M $7.299M Debt/TNW Quarterly <1.0x < 1.75x .60x .54x 1.47x 1.24.1 Current Quarterly ~ 1.901 ~ 1.751 2.671 3.10x 2.07x 2.48x Ratio Maximum Annually ~ S750M 5 S850M $161M 140M S850M $124M CAPEX'" Min OSCR Annually Nla > 1.0Ox 1.39x 2.4Ox 1.21x 3.29x (FYE '04) ~ 1.25x (FYE 'D51 thereafter)) "'CAPEX covenant is net of 2004 building acquisKlon .In addition to the financial covenants outlined above, the proposed facility will be cross defaulted with the Borrower's revolving credit facility (Note #200350). . Definitions: 1) Net Worth - as defined in the Loan Agreement Is the aggregate of capital and surplus of the Borrower, all determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 2) Tangible Net Worth - as defined in the Loan Agreement is net worth less any intangible assets including patents. trademarks. trade names, copyrights. licenses, goodwill. and deferred charges. 3) Debt Service Coverage Ratio (OSeR) . defined as EBITDA less Distributions/P&1. )j' . Reoavment Sources: Prima/y: Cash flow from operations Secondary: Refinance by another lender Tertiary: Uquidation of collateral Risk Ratine Rationale A "4A" risk rating Is appropriate based on the following: . Considerably improved financial posltlon of the Company, The Company has returned to profitability, reduced debt substantially and improved financial ratios as of FYE 2003. . Strong balance sheet. leveraged at 0.60x at FYE 8.31.03 and 0.54x at the sixth-month interim period ending 2.29-04. . Good liquidity and wort<ing capital position with $900M in cash at FYE 8-31.03 and $1.2MM at the sixth. month interim period ending 2-29--04. . Strong collateral margin wfth no outstandlngs on the line of credtt for the past 12 months - The company's management is experienced. proactlve and dynamic and has taken appropriate steps to reposition the company to face the challenges of an economy in recession as well as risks associated with concentrations - within industry segments and with individual customers - as are typically found In the borrower's business - The facility is non-recourse 3 . . '/ I Apr. 14. 200411:17AM EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No. 2079 P. 5/22 . Lack of consistent earnings and cash flow coverage of debt service prohibit a 3 rating at this time. . Customer concentration with Polaris (73%) and Rockwell (10%). _ Sufficient historical and pro-forma cash flow to support the companies existing dabt sarviea requirements and the proposed mortgage. . Six-month annualized EBITDA, less annualized dividends, provides a 1.58x coverage; pro-forma 2004 EBITDA provides a 1.21x coverage (this includes the borrower canying both facilities during FY 2004): and pro-forma 2005 EBITDA provides for a 3.29x coverage (this includes six. months of canying both facilities until the old lease expires in February 2005). . Policy Comoliance Exceptions to POlicy: None Exceptions to Guidelines: 1) LTV exceeds the guideline maximum of 75%. Mitigated by the property being owner occupied and the Company showing sufficient historical and proforma cash flow to service the prapOliied debt at 80% L TV. Proforma 2004 E81TDA of $737M provides a DSCR of 1.21 x (including both facilities) based on the companies existing debt service requirements and the proposed mortgage amortized over 20 yeats (although the bank is proposing a 25 year amortization). pro-forma FY 2005 EBITDA of $1,902M provides for a DSCR of 3.29x coverage (includes 6.months of carrying both facilities) . EBITDA Less: Dividends Cash Available for DS Annualized 6-month period endlnlJ FebrualV 29.2004 $1,000M ( 382M) $ 818M Pro-forma ~ $ 737M ( 383M) $ 354M Debt Service Requirements: Proposed mortgage (20 yr amort /5.2%) P&I $ 123M Existing CML T 196M Interest 72M TotalDSR $ 391M $ 31M (3 mos) 196M 66M $ 293M 1.21x DSCR 1.58x Pro-fonna 2005 $1,902M ( 400Ml $1,502M $ 123M 268M 66M $ 457M 3.29x 2) Proposed pricing and fee do not meet guidelines for a 4A credit. Excel Bank matched a competitive offer In order to get the deal. LTV: ~80% CREDIT ANALYSIS erooertv OwnershiD and Manaaement The proposed facility will be 100% owner occupied by WSllndsutries, Inc. WSllndustries, Inc. perfonns precision contract machining for the aerospace. communications and industrial markeis. The major portion of the company's revenues is derived from machining work for the aerospace/avionics industry and recreational vehicles markets. The common stock of the Company is traded on the NASDAO Small Cap Market System under the symbol WSCr. As of March 30, 2004 the stock was trading at $2.60 with a 52-week high of $3.49 and a 52-week low of $0.99. Market capitalization is . reported at $6.64 million. The stock is thinly traded with nominal activity. 4 Apr. 14. 200411:17AM EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No. 2079 p, 6/22 . Management: Chairman: George J. Martin President CEO & Director: Michael J. Pudil VP Treasurer and Assistant Secy.; Paul D. Sheely Secretary: Gerald e. Magnuson George J. Martin (65) has seNed as the Chairman of the Board since July 1993. ~rior to that, he served as the company's CEO from December 1983 to January 1985. Mr. Martin was the President, CEO and Chairman of PowCon. Inc., a manufacturer of electronic welding systems from 1987 to October 1995 where he now serves as an independent consultant. Michael J. Pudll. (54) has been the President CEO and Director of the company since November 1993. Prior to that Mr. Pudil worked for Remmele Engineering, Inc. ("Remmele") for 9 years. Remmele is a contract manufacturer primarily involved in machining metal. Mr. Pudil served as the General Manager and VP and General Manager of the Production Division. Paul D. Sheely (43) joined the company in 1998 as VP of Finance. From 1996.1998 he served as the CFO of Grasbey Medical. Inc., a medical device manufacturer of volumetric infusion pumps. Gerald E. Magnuson (72) has served as the Secretary since 1961 and as a Director from 1962 to 2001. He is a retired partner of the law firm of Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L,P., Minneapolis, MN. Leas. AnalYSis N/a. WSllndustries, Inc. will occupy 100% of the building. . Summary Financial Results - WSllndustries, Inc.: (OOO's) 1999 2000 ZQQ1 2002 2003 Revenue $21,550 '$32,157 2$20,877 3$12,948 3$10.793 EBITDA $2,299 4$3,545 5$2,046 6$1,153 7$1.296 EBITDA Margin 10.67% 11.02% 9.80% 8.90% 12.01% Net Income $261 $639 ($1,193) ($813) $453 Bank Debt $9.882 $7.949 $3.430 $1,025 $844 Total Debt $16,261 $14,486 $8,586 $2,860 51.782 TNW $2,507 $2,627 $1 An $2,375 $2,965 DebtfTNW 6.49x 5.51x 5.81x 1.20x 0.61x EBITDA I Interest Expense 4.78x 3.55x 2.49x 3.18x 10.45x EBITDA I DS 1.05x 2.87x 0.70x 1.57x 1.76x . 1The 49% increase in revenues was due primarily to a full year of operations of the Taurus Numeric Tools. Inc. ("Taurus") and Bowman Tool & Machining, Inc. ("Bowman"). Taurus is a precision contract machining company serving the aerospace and avionics industry. Bowman is a contract machining company serving the construction industry. Taurus was acquired on February 15, 1999 and Bowman was acquired on August 6, 1999. Bowman has since been sold in response to Deere & CO,'s ("Deere") decision to move its construction equipment manufacturing faciilty to Mexico. Xfhe decline in revenues is due to Deere's decision to consign raw materials for Its manufacturing program. This change reduced revenues by 113. Economy related factors were responsible for the remaining contraction In revenues. 3 The decline in revenues is due the Bowman sale in FebNary 2002 and thus the inclusion of only a half. year Bowman sales in 2002 operations versus a full year In 2001 and versus .0- Bowman sales in 2003 versus half-year Bowman sales In 2002. ~ s A p r. 14, 2004 11: 17 AM EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No. 2079 P. 7/22 . jExcludes a $396M gain on sale of assets. $353M gain from elimination of pension plan and $248M In severance costs. $Excludes 5123M gain on sale of assets and $151 M due to fair market value impairment of equipment 6Excludes 52,506M lOSS on sale of assets (Bowman sale) 7Excludes 51 OM loss on sale of assets Interim Results: Net sales were $2,616,000 for the quarter ending FebMJary 29.2004. an increase of 11% or $257,000 from the same period of the prior year. Year to date sales in flscal2004 were 55,422,000 compared to $4,793,000 in the prior year. The increase in sales for the quarter, as well as the six months. came from an increase in sales to the Company's recreational vehicle market Gross margin decreased to 16% for the quarter ending February 29, 2004 versus 17% in the year ago period. The slight decrease in gross margin is attributable to higher levels of productlon supply and repair expenses. Year to date gross margins were 15% and 18% for the six-month periods ending February 29,2004 and February 23,2003. . Selling and administrative expense of $341,000 for the quarter ending February 29, 2004 was $30,000 higher than in the prior year period due to higher professional service costs, Yearto date selling and administrative expense of 5659,000 was 530.000 lower than the comparable prior year period. Selling and administrative expense for the six~month period ending February 23. 2003 was negatively affected by $60,000 of costs associated with a proxy contest that the Company was involved In. The proxy contest was resolved with all costs incurred by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2003 Interest expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 was $15,000, which was 524,000 less than the second quarter of fiscal 2003 amount of $39,000. The decrease Is attributable to reduced levels of debt for the Company -long-term debt at February 29, 2004 was $748,000 compared to 51,213,000 at February 23, 2003. Year to date interest expense is also down for the same reason. The Company recorded income tax expense at an effective tax rate of 33% and 36% for the quarter and six months ended February 29, 2004. For the quarter and six months ended February 23, 2003, the Company recorded Income tax expense of 36%. Liquidity and Capital Resources On February 29, 2004, working capital was 52,277,000 compared to $2,139.000 at August 31, 2003. The ratio of current assets to current Iiabilltit$ at February 29, 2004 was 3.10 to 1.0 compared to 2.89 to 1,0 at August 31,2003. The Company's cash balance increased $294,000 during the first six months primarily from collections of accounts receivable. The Company renewed its $1,000.000 revolving credit facility with the bank. Interest on the new agreement is at the bank's prime rate. No amounts have been borrowed sInce the closing of the original agreement in December 2002. . On each of November 13, 2003 and February 6, 2004, the Company paid quarterty dividends of $.0375 per share. The dividend payments for the 2004 fiscal year have totaled 5191,000. It is the Company's belief that its intemally generated funds, as well as its line of credit, will be sufficient to enable the Company to meet its working capital requirements during fiscal 2004. 6 . . . A p r. 14. 2004 11: 18 AM EXCEL BANK MINNESOTA No. 2079 P. 8/22 Pro Formas The borrower has provided pro fonna 1inancial statements for FYE 8-31-04 and FYE 8-31-05 which include the proposed building acquisItion. Fiscal year 2004 pro fonnas result in a break-even year on 511,204M in annual revenue. POlaris represents 80% of pro forma revenue (AN's at 45% and motorcycles at 55%) and Rockwell represents approximately 5% of pro fonna revenue. Included In 2004 pro forma revenue is approximately $900M in a new Polaris part the company has taken on, the crankcase project. FY 2004 expenses include the relocation expense to the new facility. FY '04 includes $311M of expense related to relocation and the costs of owning neasing 2 buildings at the same time, resulting in the ~reak-even year. However, the direct operations are profitable In 2004 excluding the relocations items. Fiscal year 2005 pro formas result in $686M In net profit on S1S,S09M in annual revenue. Polaris represents 78% of pr forma revenue (A TV's at 50% and motorcycles at 50%) and Rockwell represents approximately 6.4% of pro forma 2005 revenue. Increased sales are the result of the POlaris crankcase project which increases to $3.1 MM in revenue In FY 2005 and a new assembly project on the A TV head with Polaris which accounts for $1.4MM of the 2005 pro forma revenue. The new assembly work for Polaris is work Polaris used to do themselves upon receipt of the A TV heads from WSI. They have now given the assembly work to WSI. Includedln FY '05 pro forma expenses is $109M which Is the cost of renijng the old OsSElO facility until the lease expires. Pro forma CAPEX totals $2,750M and include the building acquisition at $1.9MM; S50M of closing costs related to the new building; 2 new pieces of equIpment for the Polaris crankcase project totaling $650M; and $150M of equipment they may need for the new building. Coveraqe Analysis This facility will be an owner occupied building. WSI Industries, Inc. will own and occupy 100% of the building. WSllndustries, Inc.: EBITDA Less: Dividends Cash Available for DS Annualized 6-month cenoe! endina Februarv 29. 2004 51,OOOM ( 382M) S 618M Pro-fonna 2QQL $ 737M ( 383M) $ 354M Debt ServIce Requirements: Proposed mortgage (20 yr amort I 5.2%) P&I $ 123M Existing CML T 196M Interest 72M Total DSR $ 391M $ 31M (3/l101) 196M 66M $ 293M DSCR 1.58x 1.21x 7 Pro-forma m $1.S02M ( 400M) $1,502M S 123M 268M 66M $ 457M 3.29x . . . EDA Agenda - 04120/04 5. Public Hearin2: _ Consideration to aporove or deny GMEF No. 023. a business subsidy. for WSI Industries. Inc. A. Reference and Back2:round: After review and discussion ofthe preliminary application from WSI Industries, Inc., the EDA Chair should open the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARrNG The business subsidy notice appeared in the local newspaper April 15.2004, for compliance of the Minnesota Statutes 2000, 116J.994: Before granting a business subsidy that exceeds $100.000 for a local government grantor, the grantor must provide public notice and a hearing on the subsidy. Please open the public hearing for comments. The EDA is asked to consider approval or denial of the request for a $350,000 GMEF loan. The lender, Excel Bank, has provided the Bank's commitment letter and a letter stating WSI is an existing credit worthy business. First, the EDA needs to determine if this GMEF loan application from WSI will encourage economic development. Secondly. the EDA must determine if the preliminary real property acquisition and development loan application complies with the EDA Business Subsidy Criteria _ GMEF Guidelines. Lastly, the EDA must determine the amount, terms, and fee of the loan for approval. The City Council will consider ratification ofthe EDA's action fiJr compliance of the EDA- GMEF Business Subsidy Criteria on April 26, 2004. If approved, the GMEF will be disbursed at the closing date anticipated for the first week in May. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Prior to closing the public hearing, please publicly identify and summarize the terms orthe business subsidy for approval to WSI by the Authority: ..-.-- B. Alternative Action: 1. A motion to approve GMEF Loan No. 023 for WSI in the amount of $350,000 with term and conditions as recommended at the meeting. Collateral, guarantees, and other EDA Agenda - 04/20104 . Collateral, guarantees, and other condition requirements to be determined and prepared by the GMEF attorney. The GMEF loan approval subject to Lender commitment, credit worthiness letter and Council ratification of ED A action. 2. A motion to deny GMEF Loan No. 023 for WSI. 3. A motion to table any action. c. Recommendation: Recommendation is for Alternative No.1 at $350,000 with terms and conditions as recommended at the meeting. Approval subject to Council ratification of the EDA action. The suggested amount of $350,000 was recommended by the Economic Development Director and supported by the City Administrator to encourage a quality manufacturer to acquire a vacant building, EDA funds available, meets EDA guidelines, and TIF not applicable. D. Supporting Data: Public Hearing Notice. . . 2 . I r ~ ~ - - ~ . . .....~.. ..." .......... '....IUIIUc:;;U LV all UIUUf,;r~ upon return 01 the documen1s in good condition within ten days after receipt of bids. Contractors who do not submit bids will receive refund of one half of their deposit for plans and specifications that are returned within ten days after receipt of bids. Subcontractors or suppliers may purchase the entire set of plans and specifica- tions for a non-refundable cost of $50 plus shipping and handling. Subcontractors or suppliers who desire Individual plan sheets or speclflca.tions may purchase copies at the non-refundable cost of reproduction and delivery. Complete Construction from: Architects Rege oj Youngquist, Inc. 5217 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55416 Plans and Specification Deposit of $100.00 BID WAIVER Bids may not be withdrawn within thirty days after the scheduled closing time for receiving bids. The Independent School District 882, Monticello, Minnesota, reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any irregularities in bids. Independent School District No. 882 Monticello, Minnesota By: Mary M. Micke, Clerk (April 8, 15,2004) NDTICE DF PUBLIC HEARING ECDNOMIC DEVELDPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FDR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO' COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA . NOTICE .IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, April 20, 2004, at approximateiy 4:00 p.m., at the City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Academy Room, Monticello, Minnesota, regarding a proposed business subsidy to be grant- ed by the Economic Development Authority to WSllndustries, Inc. (the "Recipient") under Business Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.994. The pro- posed subsidy involves a low interest rate loan to assist with the real estate acqui- sition of a manufacturing facility by the Recipient in the City of Monticello. Proposed amount of the subsidy is $350,000. Information about the proposed business subsidy is available tor inspection at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their views orally or in writing. BY ORDER OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -Ollie Koropchak, Executive Director (April 15, 2004) MONTICELLO TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT NDTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization of the TownShip of Monticello of Wright County, Minnesota will meet at the Office of the Clerk in said Township, at 9:00 a.m., on TueSday, the 27th day of April, 2004 for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of said township for the year, 2004. All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment, or who wish to complain that the property of another is assessed too low, are hereby noti- fied to appear at said meeting, and show cause of having such assessment cor- rected. No complaint that another person is assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed, or his agent, shall have been notified of such complaint. Given under my hand this 15th day of March, 2004. -Darlene Sawatzke, Clerk of the Town of Monticello (April 15, 22, 2004) . SILVER CREEK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Local Board of Appeai and Equalization of the TownShip of Silver Cr€ek of Wright County, Minnesota, will meet at the Office of the Clerk in said Township, at 1 :00 p.m., on Wednesday, the 28th day of April, 2004 for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of said township for the year 2004. All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment, or who Wish to complain that the property of another is assessed too iow, are hereby notified to appear at said meeting, and show cause of having such assessment cor- rected. No complaint that another person is assessed too low will be acted upon untii the person so assessed, or his agent, shall have been notified of such complaint. Given under my hand this 29th day of March, 2004. -Sandra M. Forsman, Clerk of tile Township of Silver Creek (April 15, Z2, 2004) NDTlCE OF HEARING DN IMPRDVEMENT PRAIRIE RDAD RECDNSTRUCTIDN PROJECT NO. 2003-02C TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Monticello will meet in the council chambers of city hall at 7 p.m. on April 26, 2004 to consider the making of an improvement on Prairie Road from CSAH 75 to the proposed plat of Timber Ridge 3rd Addition by the reconstruction of the roadway to an urban roadway sec- tion with concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, extension of sanitary sewer and water- main to serve the Timber Ridge development, storm sewer improvements and other appurtenant Work pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ~ 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the property abutting Prairie Road and the proposed Timber Ridge development. The estimated cost of thl' Imnrnv..m..nt I" 1ll71::.., ,,,,,^ Lance Lindstrom from Silver Cree~ TownShip noted that his comments relalec to agenda item #11 which dqait with th( proposed MnDOT options for a 1_ 94/Highway 10 connection. He stated he has a signed petition tha1 sets out theil opposition to MnDOT's proposal. Mayol Thielen directed that the petition be lefl with city staff. 5. Consent Agenda A.Conslderatlon of ratifying new hires for the liquor store. Recommendlltion: Approve the new hires as Identified. B. Approval of beer license for Montloello Lions for River Fest Celebration. Recommendation: Approve a temporary license for the Lions Club for River Fest activities on July 10-11, 2004. C. Approve renewal of charitable gam- bling licenses for Monticello Lions Club. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving renewal of charitable gambiing license for. the Monticello Lions Club for gambling activities at Monticello Country Club, Hawks Sports Bar and Grill and River City Lanes. D. Consideration of authorizing expen- diture for representatives of Fire Department to attend a vendors expo. Recommendation: Authorize an expendi- ture of up to $1,000 for representatives of the Fire Department to attend the vendors expo at the FDIC Conference in Indianapolis. E. Consideration at authorizing adver- tisement for bids for a new fire tanker. Recommendation: Authorize the Monticello Joint Fire Board to proceed with advertisement for bids for a new 3,000 gal- lon tanker truck. F. Consideration of adopting a resoiu- tion in support of DNR grant for dock installation at West Bridge Park. Recommendation: Approve a resoiution authorizing the City of Monticello to enter into an agreement with the DNR for instal- lation of a fishing pier at West Bridge Park. G. Review well head protection delin- eation and consideration of forwarding to Minnesota Department of Health. (Agenda Item #12)-Recommendation: Review the draft report and authorize its submittal to the Minnesota Department of Health. ROGER CARLSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE ADDITION OF AGENDA ITEM #12 AS 5G. ROBBIE SMITH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANi- MOUSLY. 6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion. None. 7. Public Hearing on vacation of drainage and utility easements for Lots 5 & 6 and 7 & 8, Block 3 of the Meadows 2nd Addition. Deputy City Administrator, Jeff O'Neill explained that as part of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of two 4 unit structures on these combined lots, the interior drainage and utility easements on Lots 5 and 6, and Lot 7 and 8, Block 3. of the Meadows 2nd Addition were to be vacated. The City Ilas complied with tile requirements for posted and published notice of tile hearing for the easement vacation. Mayor Thielen opened tile public hear- Ing on the easement vacation. Mike Schneider from Homestead Multi-Family Development Corporation spoke to. the Council. He stated that when the adminiS- trative lot combination was approved in January, the City required that a develop. ment agreement be drafted to cover this development. Mike Schneider stated tile development agreement spelled out charges for trunk sanitary sewer, trunl< water, trunk storm sewer and park and pathway fees. He questioned whether these charges were appropriate since these lots were already platted and would have paid these charges wilen the plat of the Meadows 2nd Addition was approved. He did not feel because platted lots were combined that there stlOuld be additionai Chllr~~.S~. ~,. , i (, i ( [, I, ~" l r LJ: t; t. r ~ . . . EDA Agenda - 04/20104 6. Executive Director's Report. a) Job and Wage Level Survey - Forty-two businesses were mailed ajob and wage level form to complete and return by March 1,2004. Twenty-nine have becn returned after a second mailing was sent March 24 with a deadline date of April 15. The number of jobs will be used to update the Monticello Community Profile. The wage levels will be calculated to determinc dollars available for spending in our community, one economic bcnefit resulting from thc successful recruitment of industrial and commercial busincsses. b) Minnesota Business Assistance Forms - Any business who receives assistance from the City, HM, or EDA must account for jobs committed within the Loan Agreement or Private Development Contract. This a part of the Minnesota Business Subsidy Law. The reports are due each April 1. Job creation is reported untilneithcr the jobs are created or until two years of benefit datc whichever is first. The EDA in April will review a loan to EDMA for non- compliance of job creation. Completed forms mailed March 22 to MN DEED. '['he year-end progress report for the State/City Grant then loan to UMC was also completcd and mailed.. c) HRA Annual meeting in April - Landmark Square II TIF assistance approved at $352,500 and Block 52 redevelopmcnt, proposed Walgreen's. Not at meeting, still working on Purchase Agreements.. I've been invited to the Waverly Planning and Zoning and EDA meeting on April 14 to talk about the practical application ofTIF. I'll join Dan Greensweig, State Auditor's Office, previous lIRA attorney. 2003 TIF Report Information and Forms arrived. Must be completed and submitted to State Auditor's Office by August 1.2004. d)EDA Annual meeting in April 27 - Block 35 Improvements and other items. e) Marketing Committee - Chamber Golf Outing is May 20 - gratis invitations were mailed to 75 developers, builders, etc. Survey to local manufacturers to list preferred five industrial magazincs read is ready to mail right after Council's authorization to purchase land. t) I ,cads - March 26 - Meeting with a manufacturing business who is interested in the EDA loan and Monticello location. (Acquisition of Remmelc building). March 17 - Visited a Monticello manufacturer looking to expand in fall 2004. March 24 - Metal fabricator looking to relocate from metro. Wants to lease 10,000 sq ft. Currently 6 jobs. Suggested: Standard Iron and Kaltac. EDA loan for M&E. March 18 - ll- Window building had an offer which was turned down. Knut Flakk, Norway, stopped by my office to visit. March 25 - Toured Monticello with United Propcrtics. Looking for large track ofland for future Business Park development. Some interest in shared marketing with City on Chadwick property. He suggested Chelsea Road not run parallel to Interstate, particularly, if additional car, boat, etc dealers are allowed. He believes this will EDA Agenda - 04/20/04 . devalue city property and not suitable for Business Park development. Looked at Gold Nugget, Pauman, and Osowski. Another meeting scheduled f()f April 14. 17,000 sq ft for Industrial eleaner of eloths - County lead. Other commercial leads g) Development ofIndustrial Parks - Jeffrey Peterson, First American Exchange; Chuck Van Heel, Allied Properties; and Steve Schwanke, RLK. April 16, 11:30, Russell's, St. Michael, $30. h) The proposed date of the Industrial Banquet is Tuesday, June 22,2004. i) Attached is thc job and wage report for the companies with current TIF or loan assistance. j) Letter of Request for HRA audited or unaudited financial statements. k) Council tabled action to approve a Purchase Agreement for the Chadwick property because the Agreement was not finished and Chadwick will agree to 2: 1 ratio for Chelsea Road improvements if freeway land is commercial. Small Industrial Group, City Attorney, City Engineer, and staffwill meet April 14. Hopefully back on the Council agenda for April 26. . . 2 03/16/04 TOE 15:45 FAX 7632715249 UMC. INC. If&I uu,", \j -; , "', I . I w.....'.....--. .' '.- . . . . . , , . . . , ! .. .", DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Economic Development Director Phone; fa:\;; Email ; (763)271-3208 (763) 295-4404 oil iC.koronchnktci':c.:i. mOll til;l;.':lIo. I1m.lIS MONI1CELW CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA II JOB AND WAGE LEVEL - EXISTING JOBS ::J] Please indicate number of current employees at each level and indicate the corresponding benefit level. Number of .lobs Hourlv Wage Hourlv Value Level of Voluntary Bcnetits (S) FLlll-timc Part.,.time (Excl. benefits) . ..(;;;Y '2- Less than $7.00 ^' JA ~- \ $7.0010 $7.99 sO.'7S ----, ~ \ $8.00 to $9.99 "O.QO -- -- I ._$ $10.00 to $11.99 -2. 2,\ S ;2. $12.00 to $13.99 ":l.t:!> J'2 g $14.00 to $1 5.99 -'.3 . I~ -- r3 ~ $16.00 to $] 7.99 _,yS7 ;23 .f1Y I 1 . .)l18.00 to $19.99 ~ 3' ""l ;i fq .J 'T."" g- o $20.00 to $21.99 ~8' e S22.00 and higher ~S'.:l.S \Q\ \0 Company Name U fV'I C- -=ro'1 c. . .cmsw AGE-20W Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite I, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 · (763) 295-2711 . Fax: (763) 295-4404 Office of Public Works. 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362. (763) 295-3170. Fax: (763) 271-3272 ~ ' " ~ i\. '?-'ls -0'3, ~.,\~ 'l-'"";l..\"''- b4 '-.t. '). '7 '\ ":l " "l- .5 l\ - ":l "3 - (':) -::L. \?- . g -5 ? '\) MONTICELLO ~R\A- V\- '? - b ~ ~ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ~.~ ~ ~ ~ Economic Development Director \...- t>>l ..-- t) tr1-, "':J l) - ./ S ~ CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA ~6~R\<'t.~O .- Phone: Fax: Email: (763) 271-3208 (763) 295-4404 nil ie. kOl"onch akrihi. monticelln.mn.lIs II JOB AND WAGE LEVEL - EXISTING JOBS II Please indicate number of current employees at each level and indicate the corresponding benefit level. Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831' (763) 295-2711 . Fax; (763) 295-4404 A""'_~ ^< Dn1.1:~ \llMlro ana n^lf ('nnw. Rri Mnnti""lln MN :'i:'iln2. (763) 295-3170. Fax: (763) 271-3272 J1 .., " , , .. w....".......... " - '. < , ',', \ "'1 "1 '\ ""r' , ) i' f 'l MONTICELW '\) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Economic Development Director Phone: Fax: Email: (763) 271-3208 (763) 295-4404 nil ie.koronchakru:ci. montice !lo. mn. us CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA II Number of Jobs Full-time . l ~ 7 \'2- L\ 1-\ -, S\o Company Name . JOBSW AGE.2004 s~ JOB AND WAGE LEVEL - EXISTING JOBS II Please indicate number of current employees at each level and indicate the corresponding benefit level. Hourly Wage Level Hourly Value of Voluntary Benefits (S) Part-time (Excl. benefits) "__L_ o Less than $7.00 $7.00 to $7.99 $8.00 to $9.99 l $10.00 to $11.99 \,15 \. 5 ].. \.1.\B 2. It- 3.35 lt5\ ~,105 $12.00 to $13.99 $14.00 to $15.99 \ $16.00 to $17.99 $18.00 to $19.99 $20.00 to $2 I .99 $22.00 and higher \,5 T Clppe..~ :",' I-rtc. c\Dn:~~(~~~~~U(ts Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 . (763) 295-2711 . Fax; (763) 295-4404 nf'f;^Q ^f P"hl;r Wnrlr< Q()Q nnlf r()l1T~'" ReI.. Monticello. MN 55362. (763) 295-3170' Fax; (763) 271-3272 ..~ ,# , I . I w....-..-....--................... ,. . - . . . - . . . . , . . \ . , . . , ' " ,\ ! ! 1: J! r l ',) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Economic Development Director Phone: Fax: Email: (763) 271-3208 (763) 295-4404 ollie.koropchakta-:ci. monticello. om, us MONTICELW CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA II JOB AND WAGE LEVEL - EXISTING JOBS II Please indicate number of current employees at each level and indicate the corresponding benefit level. Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 . (763) 295-271] . Fax: (763) 295-4404 HT 1 IH\A ,......_1.c.,.....,~__~..~ T....J ......~~...~__11~ '\6.....1 ~~'1t::., ..''''7t:..''J.\ ..,(loCi: "::tl"7(). -.:;...."'. f'7t;.':l\ 1"71_1.17'1