Loading...
City Council Minutes 05-12-1999 Joint Board of ReviewMINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOARD OF REVIEW Wednesday, May 12, 1999 - 7 p.m. Council Present: Roger Belsaas, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen Council Absent: None A special meeting of the City Council was held for the purpose of conducting the annual Board of Review regarding valuations far taxes payable in 2000. County Assessor Jerry Kritzek reported that the average county-wide increase in 1999 valuations was 5%. Appeals can be made to the Wright County Board of Equalization on June 16, 1999, by calling the Wright County Auditor's Office for an appointment. 155-014-001120 -Owner requested that valuation be decreased. Increase was due to county-wide square footage rate increase. A MOT10N WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMFF TO LEAVE THE VALUATION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASSESSOR. Motion carried unanimously. 2. 155-021-002470 - Uwner requested that valuation be decreased. Increase was due to county-wide square footage rate increase. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMFF AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO LEAVE THE VALUATION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASSESSOR. Motion carried unanimously. 3. 155-015-032061 -Buyer of property requested that valuation be decreased. Increase was due to county-wide square footage rate increase. No action was required by Council since the person requesting the valuation change was not yet the owner of the property. 4. 155-059-002040 -Appeal of valuation was presented in writing. Increase was due to county-wide square footage rate increase and a deck addition. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER BELSAAS TO LEAVE THE VALUATION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASSESSOR. Motion carried unanimously. 5. 155-093-001 1 10 -Owner questioned if the valuations were going to increase S% every year, and also questioned whether townhames should be valued similarly. The assessor noted that the valuation would depend on size, similar grade of building, etc. No action was requested. Page 1 Special City Council Minutes Board of Review - 5/12/99 b. 155-093-001120 -Owner requested that valuation be decreased to more closely match the neighboring townhome which is very similar. The assessor recommended that the valuation be decreased from $130,900 to $122,000. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO DECREASE THE VALUATION TO $122,000 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASSESSOR. Motion carried unanimously. 7. 155-0$9-001040 -Owner requested that valuation be decreased due to discrepancy in square footage. The assessor noted that he could reduce the square footage of the open entry way from the second story square footage by 200 sq Ft, which would reduce the valuation to $257,400. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO DECREASE THE VALUATION TO $257,400 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASSESSOR. Motion carried unanimously. S. 155-019-005050 -Owner requested that valuation be decreased to match similar homes in the area. Increase was due to county-wide square footage increase; however, Council tabled action on this parcel until later in the meeting to allow the owner time to locate the assessing information for a comparable home in the area. 9. 155-037-002020 and 155-037-011020 -Owner requested that combined valuation of townhoune and garage be reduced. Increase was due to county-wide square footage increase; however, the assessor recommended that due to the lack of similar home sales in the area, he could review the entire townhouse complex and return to Council with a recommendation. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ASSESSOR TO REVIEW THE TOWNHOME COMPLEX AND RETURN TO COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION. Motion carried unanimously. 10. 155-037-002050 and 155-037-011050 - No action was required, as this unit will be reviewed by the assessor as noted in #9 above. 11. 155-010-0450b0 -Owner requested clarification of whether the age of a building is considered in the valuation. It was noted that depreciation is included when assessing buildings. No action was requested. Page 2 Special City Council Minutes Board of Review - 5/ 12/99 12. 155-081-001010 and 155-092-001010 -The assessor noted that the valuation of the building was included with the wrong lot and should be corrected. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN "TO DIRECT THE ASSESSOR TO MAKE THE CORRECTION TO THE VALUATIONS OF THESE PARCELS AS NOTED. Motion carried unanimously. 13. 155-105-004130 -Owner requested that valuation be decreased due to purchase price of $127,500 last year and a 1999 valuation of $143,300. In addition, he noted that the valuation includes a fireplace, which the home does not have. The assessor noted that the blueprint included a fireplace, but if it was not installed, it should be deducted from the valuation. He recommended that the area behind the garage be reviewed and a deduction be made for no fireplace. It was the consensus of Council that the assessor review the valuation of this parcel and return with a recommendation. 14. 155-014-001060 ~ Owner requested that valuation be decreased due to loss of trees from the 7/1/97 wind storm. It was noted that the valuations do not include trees. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO LEAVE THE VALUATION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASSESSOR. Motion carried unanimously. 15. 155-070-002130 -Owner requested that valuation be decreased due to purchase price last year of $170,000 and 1999 valuation of $196,800. The assessor explained that after reviewing the property, he was unable to recommend any reductions, as the grade of the home was correct and the valuations and sales in the neighborhood are comparable. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO LEAVE THE VALUATION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASSESSOR. Motion carried unanimously. 16. 155-014-001100 -Owner requested that valuation be decreased from $204,600 to more closely match a recent appraisal showing the value at $1$0,000. The assessor noted that comparables used in the appraisal were in Otsego, which is far enough away to affect the valuation. The proximity of the wastewater treatment plant and whether it had a negative effect on the neighborhood was also discussed. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO LEAVE THE VALUATION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASSESSOR BUT DIRECT 'T'HE ASSESSOR TO MONITOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS Page 3 Special City Council Minutes Board of Review - S/12/99 SALES OCCUR FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE ADJUSTMENTS. Voting in favor: Bruce Thielen, Brian Stumpf, Roger Belsaas, Roger Carlson. Opposed: Clint Herbst. Motion carried. 17. 155-014-001070 -Owner declined discussion of his property. 18. 1 SS-016-000010 -Owner requested that valuation be decreased due to development of the surrounding area. The assessor noted that 40% of the value is the river lot and that the valuation has increased less than 2% for two years. He also noted that the grade of the home had been reduced from grade 6 to 5; however, he suggested that he could again review the parcel if the Council desired. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER CARLSON AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO AUTHORIZE THE ASSESSOR TO AGAIN REVIEW THE VALUATION OF THIS PARCEL AND RETURN WITH A RECOMMENDATION. Motion carried unanimously. 8. Continued discussion of 155-019-OOSO50 -The assessor noted that the comparable home found in the neighborhood was 22 sq ft smaller and 1 S years older than the parcel in question, which would account for the difference in valuation. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO LEAVE THE VALUATION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASSESSOR. Motion carried unanimously. A MO"PION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Motion carried unanimously. !'~:. ~~ Takerben Doty Deputy City Clerk Approved by Jeff O'Neill, Deputy City Administrator -J Page 4