Loading...
1-4-89 Jt Fire Board Minutes . MINUTES MONTICELLO JOINT FIRE BOARD January 4, 1989 - 7:00 p.m. Individuals Present: Fire Department Representatives Scott Douglas, Marn Flicker, George Liefert, and Fire Chief, Willard Farnick: Township Representatives Ted Holker and Ken Scadden, along with City Administrator, Rick Wolfsteller. The purpose of the joint meeting was to discuss the Monticello Township's share of the fire department budget for 1989 and the recent purchase by the City of Monticello of a new aerial ladder pumper fire truck. It was noted that with the inclusion of the new fire truck within the formula established for the cost sharing between Monticello Township and the City of Monticello, the $280,340 truck would increase the Township's annual contribution to the fire department by approximately $4,700 per year. . Mr. Ted Holker, Township Board Member, informed the group that at the present time the Township did not feel the new aerial ladder truck would be used within the township and should not be included in the formula to determine the cost sharing arrangement. Fire department members noted that although the fire truck does contain an aerial ladder system, it is still mainly a pumper fire truck and was necessary to replace the 1962 pumper owned by the City. Normally in the past, the City's pumper truck was always used as a standby piece of equipment during a township fire but was available if needed. It was felt by the fire department members that a standby pumper is still necessary and that the Township should not just consider this new fire truck as being an aerial ladder truck usable only in the city limits. Again, the Township representatives felt the truck would not be necessarily used within the township: and their indications at this time are that they would rather not see the truck used at all for any townShip fire. Although the fire department could make arrangements with the Township that would prohibit the use of the new truck within the township, it was pointed out that there could be a liability question by having the equipment available and not responding to a fire. Fire Chief, Willie Farnick, expressed serious concern over not being able to use the piece of equipment if the department felt it was necessary and would rather see the Township not take this approach. The discussion by the group then turned to the idea that the Township should consider this new aerial truck as being a replacement pumper, which it is, and possibly the average price for the pumper fire truck only could be included within the contract. Using this approach, it was estimated that the new pumper truck by itself without the ladder would still have cost approximately $150,000 to $180,000. If within the formula a value of $150,000 was used, this would somewhat lower the Township's cost sharing arrangement. Using this approach, a separate agreement, if necessary, could still be completed to cover the use of the aerial ladder portion of the truck at a much smaller per fire charge if it was used within the township. . 1 . . . Joint Fire Board Minutes - 1/4/89 Mr. Ted Holker also noted that he felt the Township would feel more comfortable with the City being responsible for the cost of the new aerial ladder truck, and in the future the Township being responsible for replacement of their pumper or a new water truck if necessary. This was primarily because he felt the township residents would be more agreeable to paying for a water truck which is necessary within the township or the replacement of their own pumper rather than contributing toward the cost of what they felt is really a City fire truck. Although this idea was not discussed in detail, this arrangement maybe could be a reasonable approach if the Township was serious about replacing at their own cost a new tank truck, etc. Finally, fire department members noted that the new aerial ladder truck should be looked at as more than just a rescue vehicle, as the ladder portion is also meant to be able to direct water from a higher elevation. The new truck is still primarily a replacement pumper which was needed by the fire department. Although no decisions were made on a firm recommendation to the Township Board, it was noted that the city Administrator and representatives of the Fire Board will attend the Township's Board meeting on January 17 to discuss with the full Board options that are available. Gilf.!e~ City Administrator 2