City Council Minutes 07-22-2002MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, July 22, 2002 - 7 p.m.
Members Present: Roger Belsaas, Roger Carlson, Brian Stumpf and Bruce Thielen.
Members Absent: Clint Herbst
1. Call to order and Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Belsaas called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and declared a quorum present. The
Pledge of Allegiance was said.
2. A. Approve minutes of .Tule 8, 2002 regular council meeting.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 8, 2002
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
B. Approve minutes of Jule 8, 2002 workshop meeting.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 8, 2002
WORKSHOP MEETING. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
Public Works Director, John Simola added a discussion of crosswalk signs and work on the parking
lot behind Loch Jewelers to the agenda. Brian Stumpf added discussion of two fire department
related items to the agenda and Mayor Belsaas added discussion of a letter he had received
regarding garage sales and barking dogs. Brian Stumpf asked Bret Weiss if there was anything new
to add to Item #9, the Front Street Project. Bret Weiss indicated no.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ADD AGENDA ITEM #9 TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.
ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. Citizen comments/petitions, requests and complaints.
None.
Council Minutes - 7/22/02
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Consideration of ratifying new hires. Recommendation: Ratify the new hires as identified.
B. Consideration of appointment of elections judges for 2002 primary election.
Recommendation: Appoint election judges as identified contingent upon completion of
training.
C. Consideration of request for approval of an off-site storage facility - Walt's Pawn & Gun.
Recommendation: Approve the request for off site storage of pawned items contingent
upon storage facility meeting code requirements of the community it is located in.
D. Consideration of establishing a hearing date for an ordinance allowing Sunday liquor license
holders to sell liquor for on site consumption prior to noon on Sundays. Recommendation:
Set a public hearing date to consider an ordinance amendment allowing for amendments to
the Sunday liquor license hours of operation.
E. Consideration of final plat and development agreement for the Morning Glory PUD/Resi-
dential subdivision. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the final plat and
development agreement for the Morning Glory subdivision.
F. Consideration of concept and development stage approval for planned unit development
and preliminary plat for Autumn Ridge. Applicant: Shawn Weinand. Recommendation:
Approve concept and development stage planned unit development and preliminary plat for
Autumn Ridge.
G. Consideration of approving cooperative agreement with Wright County for reconstruction of
CSAH 75 from Washington Street to Otter Creek, Project No. 2000-16C.
Recommendation: Approve the cooperative agreement as drafted, authorize the City
Engineer, City Administrator and Public Works Director to attend the bid opening and to
proceed with the project should the bids come in within 5%-10% of the cost previously
estimated by the City Engineer.
9. Consideration of accepting bids and awarding the contract for the Front Street
Improvements Project No. 2001-06C. Recommendation: Award bid to Schluender
Construction, Inc. in the amount of $197,987.80. Res. No. 2002-45.
Brian Stumpf requested that item #5D be removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
ROGER CARLSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE AMENDED CONSENT AGENDA WITH
THE ADDITION OF ITEM #9 AND THE REMOVAL OF ITEM #51). BRUCE THIELEN
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
01
Council Minutes - 7/22/02
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
Brian Stumpf stated he did not feel the City should allow liquor sales before noon on Sunday. He
questioned whether it was necessary and how it would be policed. License holders would be
limited to a specific number of times that they could request sales before noon on Sunday, most
likely it would be limited to twice a year and each request would have to receive approval by the
City Council. Mayor Belsaas explained that the permit would be for special events and since the
number of permits a license holder could have is limited, he didn't feel the ordinance change would
create a problem. Brian Stumpf felt there was no reason to change the City's ordinance regarding
liquor licenses.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED NOT TO AMEND THE CITY ORDINANCE BY CHANGING
HOURS OF OPERATION FOR SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE HOLDERS. ROGER
CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED WITH ROGER BELSAAS
VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
7. Assessment hearing for Gillard Avenue Pathway and consideration of award of contract for
Gillard Avenue Improvement Project No. 2001-10C.
City Engineer, Bret Weiss reviewed the bids received on the pathway work. The cost of the
pathway work was proposed to be spread over 15 parcels. At 100% of the cost being assessed
the assessment would be approximately $5,135 per parcel. However, at an earlier meeting the
Council determined that 25% of the cost would be assessed and the remaining amount would come
from pathway funds. At 25% the cost per parcel would be $1,283.
Mayor Belsaas opened the public hearing. Jeff Nelson from 9721 Gillard Avenue North asked for
clarification of the maintenance of the pathway as referenced in the City's letter of July 10, 2002.
The Council reaffirmed that the City would not be responsible for snow removal from the pathway.
Mr. Nelson also questioned how the pathway would impact the drainage in the area. Bret Weiss
indicated that with the pathway alignment it would require some retaining wall work to be done and
the engineer felt the drainage would not be a problem.
John Simola spoke on behalf of Rosalind Sandusky, 9751 Gillard Avenue who indicated that she
was in favor of the project but felt the assessment should spread throughout the entire community.
She noted she has a sprinkler system in her yard and wanted to know how it is handled if property is
damaged during the course of construction. Brian Stumpf pointed out that this improvement was
petitioned for by the property owners and while the property owners are being assessed 25% of the
cost, the taxpayers are picking up the 75%.
Kevin Fair, 9681 Gillard Avenue, expressed his concern about snowplowing. He felt that in the
course of removing the snow from the road it would end up on the trail since the trail is only five feet
off the road. If that is the case he felt it would be very difficult for the property owners to maintain
Council Minutes - 7/22/02
the trailway. He suggested the cost of clearing the snow from the pathway also be assessed. Bruce
Thielen noted that John Gurney had contacted him and expressed this same concern. John Simola
explained that the City clears only the main corridors. This includes the pathways around the
schools, the pathway along School Boulevard and a segment of trail along TH 25 from Kjellberg's
park. He added that most communities select which segments to maintain and it is usually based on
usage. The Public Works Department will monitor this. John Simola added that if the snow crowds
the blacktopped surface of the road it would have to be pushed off.
Bret Weiss showed the Bruggeman development area and the points of access. He noted that if this
development goes through it could bring traffic up to 3000 ADT. Design standards for roadway
width is 32' and Gillard is 24. He added that there is 100' of right of way and the road could be
widened on the township side. If the City in the future entertained plans to widen the road, it could
impact the pathway. Bret Weiss felt Gillard Avenue should be able to handle the traffic and even if
there was another access from the Bruggeman development, drivers would prefer Gillard because it
is a straight shot to County Road 39. He explained that when the street was constructed there was
no assessment to the properties on the township side of Gillard Avenue. Mayor Belsaas then closed
the public hearing.
Mayor Belsaas stated that he saw no reason to change what the. Council did at the previous meeting.
Bret Weiss stated that if there were people in opposition to the assessment, they needed to give
notice to the Council at this time and file an appeal in District Court within 30 days.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE
ASSESSMENT FOR THE GILLARD AVENUE PATHWAY PROJECT AT 25% OF THE
CONSTRUCTION COST OR $1,283 PER PARCEL AND AWARD THE CONTRACT TO
SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,178. BRIAN STUMPF
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Res. #2002-43.
8. Assessment hearing for delinquent utilities and consideration of certifying delinquent utility
accounts to the County Auditor.
City Administrator, Rick Wolfsteller, briefly explained the assessments for delinquent utilities. Brian
Stumpf asked at what point is the property notified that water will be turned off.. Rick Wolfsteller
noted that for commercial accounts it was when the unpaid amount reached $500.
Mayor Belsaas opened the public hearing. No one present spoke for or against the proposed
assessment. Mayor Belsaas then closed the public hearing.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO ADOPT THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FORDELINQUENT
UTILITY CHARGES AS PRESENTED. ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Res. #2002-42.
11
Council Minutes - 7/22/02
9. Consideration of accepting bids and awarding the contract for the Front Street
Imarovements. Proiect No. 2001-06C.
Inc 1 udt d with consent agenda. Res. #2002-45
10. Consideration of development stage planned unit development and preliminary and final
plat approval allowing 11 single family residential units in an R-3 District. Central
Minnesota Housing Partnership.
This item had been discussed at a special meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission held at
5:30 on July 22, 2002. The Planning Commission felt comfortable that what was being proposed
was similar to the concept stage PUD. Originally the units were to be 1,008 sq. ft with 9' of
separation between the units. It was also noted that in order to qualify for funding the price needed
to be in the $124,000-$126,000 range. The Planning Commission felt the need to increase livable
area by requiring a full basement or at least partial basements in the facilities. This would decrease
the square footage from 1008 to 936 on the main floor and the loss of footage on the main floor
would be offset by the basement area. Jeff O'Neill showed the design and layout of the units. He
indicated that the Planning Commission also wanted to the retain the greater landscaping plan which
also requires an irrigation system. The Planning Commission wanted something affordable but
aesthetically pleasing. The units are two bedroom units with a two car garage. It was noted that
there was a list of conditions that the Planning Commission had included in their approval of the
development stage PUD. There were no revisions to these conditions other than adding the
requirement for a full/partial basement in the units. Sheri Harris stated that if the cost of the units gets
above $126,000 they can't get the gap funding that they need. While they are not certain of the
exact amount these changes will add, they believe they will be between $123,000 to $125,000 per
unit. Although the Planning Commission wanted full basements, they gave them the latitude to go
with a partial basement.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD ALLOWING 11
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED TOWNHOMES, ALONG WITH APPROVAL OF THE
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT WITH THE MOTION BASED ON THE FINDING
THAT THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT UNDER THE PUD REQUIREMENTS IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, CONSISTENT
WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WILL NOT RESULT IN A DEPRECIATION
OF ADJOINING LAND VALUES. APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. Establishment of homeowners association or other format for assuring long term maintenance of the
PUD. The association or agreement/covenants must include the following items:
5
Council Minutes - 7/22/02
• Snow Removal
• Mowing of common area and maintenance of landscaping.
• Parking stalls, drive maintenance.
• Regulations governing fences, storage buildings,
• Maintenance of exterior of building
B. Required use of pre -finished siding.
C. Completion of all site improvements and home improvements as identified in the approved plans.
D. Landscaped plantings and/or screening fence to be provided along the western boundary of the site
along with installation of landscaped plantings as shown in the attached supporting documentation.
E. Landscaping plan should include installation of an irrigation system.
F. Side yard lot lines to follow a building wall thus giving all side yard space to the homeowner opposite of
the building wall.
G. Approval of grading and drainage plans by the City Engineer.
In
H. Curb and gutter included with the alley.
Removal of existing driveways.
J. No accessory buildings.
K. Units to have a frill/partial basement with ingress/egress windows.
ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11. Consideration of establishing procedure for selecting firm to provide legal services for the
City.
The City Administrator indicated that five firms had been requested to submit proposals for legal
services and three firms had responded. The Council needed to indicate how they wanted to
proceed on this. There was discussion on the services provided by the current firm and whether
there was any improvement in their response time. It was questioned whether the firm had ever
been sent a letter listing specific concerns and asking for improvement on those. If not, it was felt
that this should be done. The Council was informed that the present city attorney was going to be
leaving the firm and going into practice on his own. The firm he was leaving was not interested in
taking on the city and since the Council would prefer to deal with a larger firm that would have the
expertise needed, it was felt that the present legal counsel would not be considered further. It was
noted that the current attorney may be retained to continue with litigation in process. The Council
felt they would interview the three firms at a special meeting of the City Council.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO HAVE THE FULL CITY COUNCIL CONDUCT THE
INTERVIEWS OF THE THREE SELECTED LEGAL FIRMS AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF
0
Council Minutes - 7/22/02
THE CITY COUNCIL SET FOR AUGUST 12, 2002 AT 5:00 P.M. BRUCE THIELEN
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Added Items:
Crosswalk - John Simola brought a sample of crosswalk sign currently being utilized by some cities.
However it was noted that the signs has not been approved by the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices Committee. Officials are trying to get this sign approved by the Committee but there is set
procedure that needs to be followed to do so. Utilizing the sign without following the specified procedures
would place the full liability on the city. He noted that later this year or early next year the results of the
various entitites experimenting with the use of this sign would be submitted to the MMUTCD Committee.
John Simola recommended that the City not install this type of sign at this time.
Parking Lot Improvements - John Simola informed the Council that they are looking at making an
improvement to the public parking lot located on Block 35, behind Loch Jewelers. The parking lot is in very
bad shape and needs to be replaced. The original parking lot improvements were made in the 1970's and
the downtown businesses were assessed for the improvement. The engineer is preparing a report outlining
the cost for the work. It was suggested that the cost of replacing the parking lot be assessed. Staff was
requesting that the Council authorize setting a public hearing on the proposed improvement.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE PUBLIC PARKING LOT LOCATED IN BLOCK 35 AT THE NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING PROVIDED NOTICE REQUIREMENTS COULD BE MET. ROGER CARLSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Fire Department Issues - Brian Stumpf noted that there is problem at the southeast corner of the fire hall
building with people cutting across there to get to the bike park. The Fire Department was requesting that
some kind of fencing be put in place to correct the situation. There is some fencing remaining from the bike
park installation that could be used. Fred Patch and Brian Stumpf will meet and work out the placement of
the fencing. Brian Stumpf also noted an item for the Police Commission agenda relating to unauthorized
vehicles in the parking lot at the Fire Hall. John Simola suggested that a sticker identifying the vehicle as an
authorized vehicle would aid the sheriff in enforcement of the parking restrictions. City Administrator, Rick
Wolfsteller indicated that a Police Commission meeting was set for July 31.
Complaints - Roger Belsaas indicated that he had received a letter from a resident concerning garage sales
and problems with barking dogs. He expressed concern that there may not be enough clout in the animal
control ordinance to resolve the problem and suggested that it be looked at.
Autumn Ride - Jeff O'Neill indicated that the access to County Road 117 from the proposed plat was
being reviewed by the County and there is a possibility that only one access will be allowed. Bret Weiss
indicated that he felt that two accesses are appropriate and warranted. The County would not okay it
unless the speed limit was 45 mph. Bruce Thielen asked if the County would do a speed study. The
VA
Council Minutes - 7/22/02 r
Council felt the speed limit in this area would have to be looked at especially when the Gold Nugget
property developed.
12. Approve payment of bills for July.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR JULY. BRUCE
THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
13. Adjourn.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ADJOURN AT 8:05 P.M. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED
THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Recording Secretary
0
U