EDA Agenda 07-22-1997AGENDA
MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Tuesday, July 22,1997 - 7:30 a.m.
City Hall
MEMBERS: Chairperson Ron Hoglund, Vice Chairperson Barb Schwientek, Assistant
Treasurer Ken Maus, Clint Herbst, Roger Carlson, Bill Demeules, and Darrin
Lahr.
STAFF: EDA Treasurer Rick Wolfsteller, Economic Director Ollie Koropchak, and Jeff
O'Neill..
GUESTS: Kevin Doty, Marquette Bank
Tom Lindquist/Carol Vogel, First National Bank of Monticello
Pam Campbell, MCP Design Committee
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE JUNE 19, 1997 EDA MINUTES.
3. CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED DMRF GUIDELINES AND
MOTION TO APPROVE THE GUIDELINES.
4. CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS THE APPLICATION AND
APPROVAL/DISAPPROVAL FORMS.
5. CONSIDERATION TO APPOINT AN EDA REPRESENTATIVE TO THE DESIGN
ADVISORY TEAM.
6. OTHER BUSINESS.
7. ADJOURNMENT.
•
MINUTES
MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Thursday, June 19,1997 - 7:00 p.m.
City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Ron Hoglund, Vice Chairperson Barb Schwientek,
Assistant Treasurer Ken Maus, Bill Demeules, and Damn Lahr.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Clint Herbst and Roger Carlson.
STAFF PRESENT: Treasurer Rick Wolfsteller and Executive Director Ollie Koropchak.
GUEST: Rusty Fifield, Ehlers and Associates, Inc.
Call to order.
Chairperson Hoglund called the EDA meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Consideration to approve the May 28, 1997 EDA Minutes
Barb Schwientek made a motion to approve the May 28, 1997 EDA minutes. Seconded
by Ken Maus and with no corrections or additions, the minutes were approved as written.
3. Consideration to review for approval the proposed guidelines for a commerciaUretail
finance~rogram and the recommendation for council approval thereafter
Rusty Fifield reported on his rationale for the attached-proposed guidelines drafted from
the discussions of the May 28 EDA meeting. The four points being: The assistance and
incentives should address both public objectives and private needs. The programs must
make best use of limited public funds. The programs should not substantially increase the
difficulty of redevelopment for the EDA or the property owner. And lastly, the programs
are targeted at existing buildings and smaller projects. They do not preclude the use of tax
increment financing or other forms of financial assistance.
Rusty continued by outlining and explaining the four proposed funding options: Facade
grants, rehabilitation loan, tax abatement, and fee reimbursement. Tax abatement is a new
program passed by Legislators which allows a taxing jurisdiction to abate (to rebate) said
portion of their taxes. It increases the property owner's cash flow for a short term
EDA members debated over the merits of the tax abatement option and a eed to strike
the "tax abatement" option. One members saw merit to invest in smaller projects and with
•
EDA MIlVUTES
JUNE 19, 1997
people we know. How much of an investment and risk does the EDA want to take? A
meaningful amount without an excessive amount suggested Fifield. One members used
an example: If improvement costs are $80,000 and the EDA has $20,000 invested, the
return is a building with improvements and increased value. Members agreed to a
rehabilitation loan of $20,000 at 2% below prime, 10-year amortization with balloon
payment in five years. Additionally, the investment would foster downtown vitality and
pedestrian traffic. Members a ee the targeted or preference area would be available to
existing buildings in Blocks 35, 36, 51, and 52, Original Plat, City of Monticello.
The front/signage matching facade grant and rear matching facade grant of $2,500 each
could serve to leverage private investment, increase aesthetic appearance, and encourage
private investment and businesses into downtown a reed EDA members. To further
enhance the implementation of downtown revitalization, members to add a side
matching facade grant of $2,500 if applicable. Improvements funded through this
program must meet all MCP Design Guidelines. For new construction projects, Fifield
suggested the use of TIF with an option for the HRA to suggest EDA funds.
One member felt to ask the applicant to borrow money for city fees, bank applications,
and property appraisals for a later repayment didn't make much sense. Members a eed
for a fee reimbursement of city related fees only. Rusty explained a fee reimbursement
rather than fee waiver was politically correct and allowed for accountability.
The program is not to promote a specific business but designed to assist a property owner
(developer) in a certain area. The program is not for equipment financing. It was
anticipated, the lending institution would provide a credit check for the downtown
assistance program EDA members directed Koropchak to draft an application process
and guidelines for adoption by the EDA at their regular July meeting with Council
adoption in August. The guidelines to be drafted per the agreements of the discussions on
the proposed guidelines as submitted by Fifield. Mayor Fair told EDA members, the
sooner the program is implementated, the better.
4. Consideration to determine funding source for the commerciaUretail finance..program and
the recommendation of a re4uest for funds
Recognizing the GMEF cash fund balance of December 31, 1996, was approximately
$275,000 and projected to be approximately $331,000 at year-end 1997, Barb Schwientek
made a motion to allocate $200,000 for the downtown assistance program from the
GMEF as seed money for 1997. The $200,000 seed money to be accounted for
separately. Bill Demeules seconded the motion and with no fiuther discussion, the motion
passed unanimously.
•
2
EDA MINUTES
JUNE 19, 1997
5. Other business.
EDA members were reminded of the joint commission/council meeting scheduled for June
30, 1997, 5:00 p.m, City Hall. Additionally, the EDA agreed to change the time of their
July 22 meeting from 7:00 p.m. to 7:30 a.m
6. Adjournment.
The EDA meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
a~ KG ~~_
Ollie Koropchak, Executive Director
•
•
EDA AGENDA
JULY 22, 1997
3. nsideration to discuss the nronosed DMRF Guidelines and motion to annrove the
guidelines.
A. Reference and Back rg ound:
Based on the agreements of the EDA members on June 19, Rusty Fifield redrafted the
criteria for the Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund (DMRF) and the EDA
Executive Director drafted the proposed guidelines. In light of the recent storm, the City
Mayor suggested the funding program be made available as soon as possible. The Mayor
has reviewed the guidelines with approval and suggested Council approval on July 28. In
the meantime, the enclosed notice was mailed to property owners.
The following individuals have received a copy of the proposed guidelines: Mayor, Jeff
O'Neill, Rita Ulrich, Pam Campbell, Kevin Doty, Tom Lindquist, Carol Vogel, Michael
Schroeder, Rusty Fifield, and Steve Bubul.
Comments received: Straight forward, add DMRFs subordinate to lender, unclear as to
closing documents needed, and MCP Design Committee members comfortable with
design guidelines; however, uncomfortable about monitoring city ordinances and codes,
and comply with all design guidelines, codes, and ordinances may need some discussion.
Two things within the guidelines: First, the addition of the maximum funding amount of
$25,000 per property is to avoid the need for job creation and the subsequent required
reporting to the State. Secondly, the $200,000 must be accounted from the GMEF-
Liquor Fund payback as the State and Federal dollars are tied to restrictions or job
creation. The current amount of Liquor Fund payback just meets the $200,000, this you
will want to note for availability of future funding for the DMRF.
B. Alternative Action:
1. A motion to approve the Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund Guidelines.
2. A motion to approve the DMRF Guidelines with modifications.
3. A motion to deny approval of the DMRF Guidelines.
4. A motion to table any action.
EDA AGENDA
JULY 22, 1997
C. Recommendation:
Recommendation is Alternative No. 1 or 2. Please note the City Building Department and
Planning Department have placed a 45-day hold on items relating to bIRA, EDA, IDC,
Parks, and MCP due to the recent storm backup and need for permitting and inspections.
D. Supporting Data:
Copy of the guidelines and mailed notice.
•
•
2
DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO REVITALIZATION FUND GUIDELINES
CITY OF MONTICELLO
250 EAST BROADWAY, P O BOX 1147
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
(612) 271-3208
PURPOSE
The Monticello Downtown and Riverfront Plan provides a guide for development in the
downtown area. As part of its efforts to implement the Plan, the Monticello Economic
Development Authority (EDA) offers financial assistance and incentives to property owners
through a program known as the Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund (DMRF).
The DMRF seeks to promote the revitalization of downtown Monticello by:
* Enhancing storefronts and facades in accordance with the design guidelines in the
Plan.
* Encouraging the rehabilitation of building interiors to bring them into compliance
with local codes and ordinances.
* Enc ura ' n to ovide ace suitable for the o osed use.
o gang budding rehabihtatio pr sp pr p
* Providing funding to close the "gap" between financing needed to undertake the
project and the amount raised by equity and private loans.
* Providing economic incentives to locate businesses in the Downtown.
These guidelines descn'be the funding parameters and eligibility criteria for programs offered by
the EDA. Meeting the eligibility criteria does not entitle an applicant to funding. The distribution
of funds is the sole decision of the EDA.
.~
TARGET AREA
These financial incentives and assistance will be available for existing buildings within the planning
area described in the Downtown and Riverfront Plan. Preference will be given to property
located in Blocks 35, 36, 51, and 52, Original Plat, City ofMonticello.
•
DMRF GUIDELINES
FACADE GRANTS
The EDA may provide matching grants in the following amounts:
* Up to $2,500 for eligible improvements to the front facade and signage.
* Up to $2,500 for eligible improvements to promote improvements to the rear
sections of the buildings.
* Up to $2,500 for eligible improvements to the side facade (if applicable).
To be eligible for grant funds, projects must meet the following criteria:
* Improvements must comply with all applicable design guidelines, codes, and
ordinances.
* The grant will match private investment up to the stated limit.
* Grant funds will be provided after completion of the improvements.
* Applicants will provide the EDA with documentation of the actual cost of the
improvements.
Meeting the eligibility criteria does not entitle an applicant to funding. The di.~tn~bution of grant
funds is the sole decision of the EDA.
REHABILITATION LOAN
The EDA may provide loans for the rehabilitation of existing bufidings. The maximum loan
amount is the lesser of 25% of total cost of improvements or $20,000. To be eligible for
rehabilitation loans, projects must meet the following criteria:
* Improvements must ceinply with all applicable design guidelines, codes, and
ordinances.
* Applicants must provide proof of financing for costs not funded by the grant.
The maximum term of the loan repayment is five (5) years. Loan repayment may
be structured with an amortization schedule of not more than ten (10) years.
•
2
DMRF GUIDELINES
* The interest rate on the loan will be two percent (2%) below the Prime Rate. The
EDA may reduce the interest rate to encourage the reuse of a currently vacant
building, the retention of an existing business, or the creation of a new business.
FEE REIMBURSEMENT
The EDA may grant reimbursement of City fees associated with undertaking improvement and
revitalization projects in the downtown area. The amount of the reimbursement will be the
equivalent often percent (10%) of the total cost of the improvements up to a maximum of $500.
Fees eligible for reimbursement include buildmg permits, other city inspections, and land use
ordinances. To be eligible for fee reimbursement, projects must meet the following criteria:
Projects must comply with all applicable design guidelines, codes, and ordinances.
Reimbursement will be made after completion of the improvements.
Reimbursement will be based on documentation of actual improvement costs and
fees paid.
~VILTM FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
The maximum amount of financial assistance available to each rehabilitation property is an amount
not to exceed $25,000.
NON-PERFORMANCE
Approved DMRF shall be null and void if funds are not drawn or disbursed within 270 days from
date of EDA approval
ORGANIZATION
The Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund is administered by the City of Monticello
Economic Development Authority (FDA), which is aseven-member board consisting of two
Council members and five appointed members. EDA members are appointed by the Mayor and
confirmed by the City Council. Formal meetings are held on a quarterly basis. Please seethe
by-laws of the EDA for more information on the structure of the organization that administers the
Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund (DMRF).
PARTICIPATING LENDING INSTITUTION
Participating lending institution shall be determined by the DMRF applicant.
•
3
DMRF GUIDELINES
2. Participating lending institution shall cooperate with the EDA and assist in carrying out
the policies of the DMRF as approved by the City Council.
3. Participating lending institution shall analyze the fiindmg application and 'indicate to the
EDA the level at which the lending institution will participate in the finance package.
LOAN APPLICATION/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
The EDA desires to make the DMRF application process as simple as possible. However, certain
procedures must be followed prior to EDA consideration of a loan request. Information
regarding the program and procedures for obtaining funding is as follows:
City Staff Duties:
The Economic Development Director, working in conjunction with the Assistant City
Administrator, shall carry out DMRF operating procedures as approved by the EDA and Council.
Staff is responsible for assisting an applicant in the application process and will work with the
applicant in development of the necessary information.
Application Process:
1. The applicant will meet with city staff to obtain information about the DMRF, discuss the
proposed project, and obtain a funding application form and a copy of Section 4 and 5 of
the MCP Design Guidelines of the Monticello Downtown and Riverfront Plan.
Staffwill direct the applicant to contact the MCP Design Advisory Team as a resource for
suggestions and review of improvements which comply with the design guidelines, codes,
and ordinances of the Monticello Downtown and Riverfront Plan.
Staffwill request the applicant contact a lending institution regarding financing needs and
indicate to applicant that further action by the EDA on the potential loan will require
indication of support from a lending institution. _
_ .~
2. The applicant shall complete a DMRF application. Staff will review the application for
consistency with the policies set forth in the Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund
Guidelines.
3. City staffwill accept the findings of a lending institution regarding applicarn credit and
financial viability of the project. EDA approval will require a letter of support from the
lending institution. Upon receipt of the letter of support, City staff shall submit a written
recommendation to the EDA and a decision regarding the application shall be made by the
EDA within 14 days of submittal of the letter of support from the lending institution.
4
DMRF GUIDELINES
4. The EDA shall have authority to approve or deny the financial assistance of the
Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund.
5. The EDA shall not disburse approved DMRF without a written acknowledgment from the
MCP Design Advisory Team that the proposed improvements comply with all applicable
design guidelines, codes, and ordinances.
6. The EDA shall not disburse approved DMRF (grants and reimbursement) without certified
documentation of the actual costs of the improvements and completion of the
improvements.
7. The EDA shall not disburse the approved DMRF (loan) without proof of financing for
costs not funded by the grant and execution of the loan closing documents.
ORIGINAL FUNDING
SOURCE -Economic Development Authority, Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund
AMOUNT - $200,000 (For Year Ending December 31, 1997).
The EDA shall disburse needed funding amounts from the payback account of the Liquor Fund of
the GMEF at such time approved fixndmg is disbursed.
REPORTING
Staff shall submit quarterly summaries and/or an annual report detailing the status of the DMRF.
FUND GUIDELINE MODIFICATION
At a minimum, the EDA shall review the Fund Guidelines on an annual basis. No changes to the
DMRF guidelines shall be instituted without prior approval of the City Council.
_ -LOAN ADMINISTRATION
1. City staff shall service and monitor all loans, matching grants, and fee reimbursements.
2. All loan documents shall include at a minimum, a note and mortgage.
dmrf guidelines 7/97
5
612-835-3166 HOISINGTON KEGLER
Creutiva Solutionx for Land Planning and Design
286 P02 JUl_ 21 '97 12:33
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
21 July 1997
Ms. Ollie Koropchak
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9245
RE: Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund Guidelines
Dear Ollie,
Rusty Fifteld and I met last Friday to review the DMRF Guidelines. We did not identify any matters
of substance in our review, but offer the following comments:
• At one time, we had discussed a grant that would be used for or to defray the costs of
architectural services. The intention was to encourage the use of profession design assistance,
a step that we believe would enhance the quality of the rehabilitation efforts. The amount we
discussed was limited to $2,500. While adherence to the Design Guidelines is desired,
professional design expertise might be seen as a way to truly enhance the project. If this
approach is used, a registered architect should be required.
• When rehabilitation occurs, a project might include modifications to the site. Therefore,
Section 3 of the Design Guidelines should be provided to applicant, with the intention being
that. even project elements that are not funded by DMRF must comply with the Design
Guidelines.
The use of MCP Design Advisory ?eam to "review" a proposed project is good. Some level
of review of the completed improvements should be required -- that is, the Design Advisory
Team should examine the completed work and acknowledge that the work meets the Design
Guidelines before funds are disbursed. This ensures conformance to the Design Guidelines
and allows the Design Advisory Team to better understand their work (learning for their next
review and even helping to shape the Design Guidelines to work better in the next project).
These are likely minor items. The revitalisation fund should be a great opportunity for those looking
to invest in Monticello's downtown.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
i ingt n oe r oup Inc.
Michael Schroeder
•
7300 Metm Boukward. Suim 525, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439
(612) 835-9960 Fax (612) 835.3160
•
COMING SOON!
ARE YOU INTERESTED IN A NEW BUILDING FACADE OR
OTHER REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS?
AS AN INCENTIVE THE MONTICELLO EDA OFFERS'I'HESE
• FUNDING ASSISTANCE OPTIONS:
MATCHING FACADE GRANTS
LOW INTEREST-RATE REHABILITATION LOANS
FEE REIMBURSEMENT
CALL OLLIE AT 271-3208 CITY HALL
(Improvements must comply with the MCP Design Guidelines
of the Monticello Downtown and Riverfront Plan.)
followuig un terms of priorities annd stail:
High Priority Items and Staff Responsibilities.
- Building Reconstruction:
Plan Review Housing -Gary
Plan Review Commercial -Fred
Planning/Zoning - Fred/Jeff
Roving inspections building and planning - Fred/Jeff
Scheduled Inspections -Rick (part time inspector)
Public Information -Answering Calls -From routine to complex - Fred/Jeff
Type and process all building permits -Wanda
Schedule all building inspections and related paperwork -Wanda
Planning Department paperwork and phones -Wanda
. Coordination ofVolunteers - Wanda and other Clerical Staff:
Additional Special Meetings preparation and minutes - Karen/others
To assist with recording and invoicing of storm related building permits, Michelle Hertv.
has been hired for 4 hours per day. In addition we recommend another temporary part
time employee be added for clerical assistance in the building department (perhaps
afternoons).
- Highway 25 Realignment - Rick/JefI7Dan Wilson
- High School/Trunk Storm sewer project - Bret/Jeff
- Resurrection Church - BretlJeff
- Reforestation Program - RFP only -Jeff
- Klein Farms, Cardinal Hill 6 -Jeff
- Planning Cases -Klein Farms Estates, Shermer Plat, Cardinal Ponds, all other planning
applications. Steve Grittman/Jeff-Bret Weiss
- Annexation Cases -Art Anderson, Orin Thompson -Steve Grittman/Jeff
- Relocation of City Hall -Rick (perhaps with assistance from Dan Wilson?)
- Budget preparation -Strategic Plan finalization incluiiing approval of governance model.
Items on 45 day Hold
- IDC/1-IRA/EDA/MCP initiatives that need staff support or input generated by the HRA or
IDC that are not storm related should be put on hold.
- National Guard Training and Community Center
- Parks Commission items.
Reforestation planning beyond collection of proposals.
Any conferences or seminars.
_ = Any initiatives listed as priorities by Council that are not listed in the priority group
above.
- Newsletter
- Homestead project
EDA AGENDA
JULY 22, 1997
4. Consideration to discuss the a~lication and apnro_ vaUdisa~roval forms
A. Reference and Background:
Enclosed for your review is the proposed application and approvaUdisapproval forms.
Hopefully, the guidelines and application are straight forward for the applicant to proceed.
The intent of the approvaUdisapproval form is for administrative purposes and record
keeping. In review with Attorney Bubul, it is my attempt to use the approvaUdisapproval
form as the closing document if in the event the applicant only applies for grant funding.
Also enclosed is the proposed Design Advisory Team Review form as prepared by Pam
Campbell or the Design Committee. I have enclosed a copy of the Design Guidelines from
the Monticello Downtown and Riverfront Plan, Draft II. Please note Section 6.0,
Oversight of the Design Guidelines.
No action is required of this item, however, please add comments or suggestions.
•
•
DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO REVITALIZATION FUND
Monticello Economic Development Authority - 271-3208
250 East Broadway, P O Boz 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
FUND APPLICATION
I. Basic Information:
Name of Applicant/Property Owner _
Address of Applicant/Property Owner
Telephone Number of Applicant/Property Owner
Social Security of Applicant/Property Owner
Tax ID# of Applicant/Property Owner
II. Nature of Revitalization Fund Request:
Street Address of Revitalization Property
PID Number of Revitalization Property
Legal Description of Revitalization Property -Block
Lot(s)
Revitalization Property is currently:
Occupied Unoccupied Prospective Occupant
If applicable, Name of Occupant (Business) ar Prospective Occuparn (Business)
If applicable, brief description of the nature of the business of the occupant:
•
Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund
Fund Application
III. Type of Revitalization Fwnd Request:
~~
A. Facade Grants
1. Front Facade and Signage Grant (Matching funds of up to $2,500)
Amount of Request $
Amount of Equity $
Projected Cost of Improvements $
Amount of Private Loans $
Brief description of the improvements for which applicant is seeking funds:
2. Rear Facade Grant (Matching funds of up to $2,500)
Amount of Request $
Projected Cost of Improvements $
Amount of Equity $ Amount of Private Loans $
Brief description of the improvements for which applicant is seeking funds:
3. Side Facade Grant (if applicable) (Matching funds of up to $2,500)
.
Amount of Request $,
Amount of Equity $
Brief description of the i~rovements for which applicant is seeking funds:
Projected Cost of Improvements $
Amount of Private Loans $
i z
•
Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund
Fund Application
B. Rehabilitation Loan (Maximum amount is the lesser of 25% of total cost of the
improvements or $20,000)
Amount of Request $ Projected Cost of Improvements $
Amount of Equity $
Brief description of the improvements for which applicant is seeking funds:
C. Fee Reimbursement (Reimbursement of City fees in an amount equivalent of
10% of the total cost of the improvements up to a maximum of $500)
Amount of Request $
IV. Lender Information:
Name of Participating Lender
Contact Person
Amount of Private Loans $
Projected Cost of City Fees $
Telephone number
Uwe certify that all information provided in this application >, true and correct to the best of
my/our knowledge. - • --
Signature of Applicant/Property Owner
Date
• ,
APPROVAL/DISAPPROVAL FORM
Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund
Economic Development Authority
in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota
Letter of Support from participating lending institution (Attached)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL:
DMRF NUMBER
GRANTEE/BORROWER
ADDRESS
Matching Grants
Amount of Front Facade and Signage Matching Grant _
Approved Disapproved
Amount of Rear Facade Matching Grant
Approved
Amount of Side Facade Matching Grant
Approved
Fee Reimbursement
Amount of Fee Reimbursement
Approved
Disapproved
Conditions for Disbursal of Matching Grant or Reimbursement Funds:
Acknowledgment of compliance with all design guidelines, codes, and ordinances (attached)
Certified documentation of actual cost of improvements (attached)
Certified evidence of completion of improvements (attached)
Rehabilitation Loan -' '"
Amount of Rehabilitation Loan
Fixed Interest Rate
Approved
Term
Disapproved
Conditions for Disbursal of Loan Funds:
Acknowledgment of compliance with all design guidelines, codes, and ordinances (attached)
Proof of financing for costs not funded by grant (attached)
Execution of loan closing documents
Disapproved
Disapproved
•
APPROVAL/DISAPPROVALFQRM
Downtown Monticello Revitalization Fund
APPRO VAL/DISAPPRO VAL
A MOTION WAS MADE BY EDA COMMISSIONER TO
(APPROVE -DISAPPROVE) DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO REVITALIZATION FUNDS IN
THE AMOUNT OF DOLLARS
AND CENTS TO PROPERTY OWNER
FOR PID# THIS DAY OF ,
19 SECONDED BY EDA COMMISSIONER
YEAS:
NAYS:
DISBURSAL OF APPROVED GRANT AND/OR REIMBURSEMENT
DMRF DISBURSED , 19
EDA TREASURER
DISBURAL OF APPROVED LOAN
DMRF DISBURSED , 19
EDA TREASURER
Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
BY CHECK NO.
BY CHECK NO.
ABSENT:
Uwe hereby accept the terms and conditions stated above for disbursal of funds by the Economic
Development Authority in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota.
DATEI;~:
_ ,r
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GRANTEEBORROWER
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA.
Its
Its Executive Director
2
~~~~
Design Advisory Team Review
Team Members
Date
Property Owner
Building Address,
Sketch of Proposed Facade Improvements:
Improvements in conformance with the Design Guidelines:
Improvements in non-conformance with the Design Guidelines:
Design Advisory Team Recommendation:
Comments:
•
When we assemble the picture it seems very real, and it might be interpreted
by some as exactly what will happen. But conditions will surface that could
not have been predicted during the course of planning downtown that might
cause an adjustment to the plan. If we think about how downtowns evolve,
nothing happens overnight. This is the intention of this plan: to allow down-
town to grow and change in ways that are dynamic and responsive rather than
ways that are prescriptive. Every project must be considered as a part of the
whole to ensure it fits the patterns of downtown, but some latitude should be
afforded the individual or group that is undertaking the project. This is where
we ultimately develop a richness and chazacter for downtown Monticello remi-
niscent of the great towns we all know.
Design Guidelines
So even as the picture seems so real, it can only be a guide. If downtown is
allowed to grow and change according to the plan, new buildings will be built
that fit overall patterns but still express their own individuality; old buildings
will be restored to mark downtown with an integrity of early Monticello; pub-
lic spaces will result that focus on the activities of the people of the communi-
ty; and downtown will have a life that springs from the way people do business
in Monticello.
While not every aspect of development is controlled, and rightly so, the aim of
this plan is the restoration of the authenticity of Monticello. It was pointed out
by many members of the community during formal interviews and casual con-
versations that the current rules discourage appropriate business activities, pre-
vent downtown businesses from making improvements that would help their
business, and keep worthy businesses from locating in downtown.
The need for rules must be recognized, however; this plan establishes "rules"
that'must be interpreted by the community. In "enforcing" rules for the down-
town and riverfront, the most important rule is the Vision statement. In
reviewing proposals for the downtown and riverfront, the first criteria is
whether the proposal meets the community's intentions as gauged by its vision.
The Guiding Principles aze the second measure of a proposal's acceptability to
the downtown and riverfront. Finally, design guidelines are used to direct a
proposal to the best possible "fit." Ultimately, these "rules" might be codified;
but to .begin, the plan expects the downtown and riverfront to evolve based on
the sensibilities of a small town rather than by legislation.
Design guidelines for Monticello's downtown and riverfront aze orgainzed to
address the overall structure of the downtown and riverfront; the design of
public spaces in the downtown and riverfront; the confiugration of sites; the
design of new. buildings; the integrity of existing buildings; and oversight of
the guidelines. The design guidelines for Monticello's downtown and river-
front are:
1.1 Create a downtown and riverfront area for Monticello that has a strong
relationship to community patterns, features, and the idea of a small
town in the country.
• Development shall occur within the existing grid of the local streets.
. The Mississippi River shall be one of the primary focal points of
1.0
The Structure of
Downtown
A New Bridge
Revibl~Ytg AMpNkelb's Downfavn and Rh~aftatf ~~'~
Pagrx~c ~ ;
downtown, with elements of the river drawn through downtown to
strengthen downtown's connection to the river.
• Terminal street views shall focus on a significant built or natucal fea-
ture (a building, pavilion, garden, the river; not a parking lot).
• Community and civic facilities shall be prominent elements of the
downtown.
•
~!
A New Br(dge
~~'~ ReNlalmngMantlcffio'sDawntownandRlvrrfiont
Page
1.2 Create a variety of uses to attract people throughout the day and night,
for activities of commerce, culture, community and civics.
• A range of uses and activities shall occur in downtown, including
commerciaUretaiI, office, public/civic, housing and recreation/enter-
tainment uses.
• A guide for uses shall be established, but flexibility should be allowed
for uses that enhance the goal of an active and vital downtown envi-
ronment.
1.3 Develop a downtown and riverfront area that is compact and walkable,
-- with a density of development and a level of activity that set it apart
from the rest of the community.
• Buildings shall be placed near the street to create a strong edge to the
street, a sense that you are passing something, and an opportunity to
see into a building from the sidewalk or see the activity of the street
from the building.
• Land resources shall be shared wherever possible to allow for a greater
amount of development in a limited space (for example, providing for
joint use parking, shared loading and service areas, and "regional"
stormwater management).
• Clustering of buildings shall be encouraged to allow people to walk
easily from one use to another; stand-alone uses and uses that are ori-
ented strongly to the automobile shall be discouraged.
• Downtown shall be as comfortable for pedestrians as it is convenient
for cars, recognizirrg that, once the car is parked, the driver becomes a
pedestrian.
• A pedestrian system shall be developed to reach all uses in downtown
and form a strong connection to surrounding neighborhoods.
1.4 Structure the street system to accommodate downtown traffic and
"through" traffic, to support businesses, improve circulation, and main-
tain a "downtown" character.
• Walnut Street and "cross" streets shall be oriented to pedestrians but
shall accommodate vehicle traffic.
• Pine Street shall be oriented to vehicles but shall accommodate pedes-
trians.
• Broadway shall be balanced in its orientation to pedestrians and vehi-
cle traffic.
• The entrances to downtown shall be marked to announce one's arrival
in downtown.
1.5 Explore a range of transportation modes to manage traffic in downtown
Monticello.
• Walking and biking shall be accommodated in downtown and at every
site in downtown.
• Regularly schedule community "circulator" service shall be explored
as a way of moving people into and out of downtown without their
cars.
• A trolley on the railroad tracks should be considered to provide for a
unique attraction and as a method of community transportation.
1.6 Recognize patterns that are appropriate to varying downtown "districts"
in an effort to create development that "fits" the context of each district.
• "Districts" shall be established to guide the general use and character
of development in the downtown and riverfront area.
• The following "districts" might be established:
Riverfront Specialty retail, eating establishments,
lodging, entertainment, multi-family
residential, office; upper level resi-
dential or office; two story buildings;
river orientation; emphasis on public
areas surrounding buildings (rather
than parking lots)
Broadway - "Downtown" Small and mid-sized retail, specialty
retail, personal and business services,
eating establishments, lodging, enter-
tainment and office; upper level resi-
dential or office; two story buildings;
orientation to Broadway
Broadway - "East and West" Single family residential; strong
emphasis on restoration of existing
older homes
Walnut Small and mid-sized retail, personal
and business services, eating estab-
lishments and office; upper level resi-
dential or office; two story buildings
encouraged; orientation to Walnut
Street
Pine Mid-sized retail and office; two story
buildings encouraged; orientation to
Pine Street
Seventh Street Larger scale retail and service, auto-
oriented retail and service, drive-
. through restaurants, lodging; orienta-
tion to Seventh Street
Transitional Small office, personal and business
services, multi-family residential and
single family homes
Neighborhood Predominantly single family homes
following existing patiems of the area
Industrial Sunny Fresh operations only; transi-
tion to Civic/Institutional, Walnut or ,_ ,
A New Bridge
Revffaltr6g ManNaUo's Dbrmtwm auxl RMvhwit ~'^~
Page-ax~ ; Zl
•
2.0
The Design of
Public Spaces
Park and Open Space
Civic/Institutional
Transitional if Sunny Fresh ceases
operation
Parks, cemeteries, outdoor public
spaces and gathering spaces
Municipal and county facilities
(except maintenance operations), pub-
lic meeting spaces, community activi-
ty spaces, educational facilities,
churches, outdoor gathering spaces
2.1 Develop a streetscape that yields a hierarchy and organization of down-
town streets, that generates and authentic identity, and results in an
attractive environment for people (those in cazs and those on foot).
Downtown streets shall be designated with front yards according the
following hierarchy:
•
A New Bridge
ReNfalFdt-gManUcd/o's Dox~ttrnm and RNeAront
Page~s'1~ ~ Z~
Broadway
River Street
Walnut Street
Pine Street
Seventh Street
Cross Streets
(For example, a building at the comer of Broadway and Walnut Street
would have Broadway as its front yard, as that street is listed higher in
the list. This should not be construed to mean that a building cannot
be designed to address two streets.)
• Recognize that some downtown streets will be oriented to vehicle traf-
fic, but will still accommodate pedestrians; and that some streets will
be oriented to pedestrians but still accommodate vehicles.
• Utilize materials that reflect local elements and culture to provide the
sense of Monticello in every street.
• Use elements that yield a more pedestrian scale, even at streets that are
oriented to vehicles (pedestrian-scale street lights, for example).
• Develop a pattern of street tree planting for all downtown streets to
create identity and consistency in downtown, but still allowing for
diversity in the streetscape.
• Provide pedestrian amenities, such as benches and trash receptacle, at
regular interval and key locations at all downtown streets.
• Provide elements that inform the community of events and happenings
in the Monticello community at likely gathering places.
• Develop a system of consistent maintenance for all public and private
spaces in downtown (rather than relying on the individual property or
business owners to keep their sidewalks and sites maintained).
2.2 Build a complete network of sidewalks in downtown and extend side-
walks into nearby neighborhoods to create a wallcing/strolling downtown
environment.
Build sidewalks with widths appropriate to levels of pedestrian traffic.
Build sidewalk connections from the sidewalk to the front door of
every building in downtown, especially those that are separated from
the sidewalk by parking areas.
• Develop sidewalks on both sides of all downtown streets and on at
least one side of all streets leading into neighborhoods
2.3 Establish spaces for community gathering that are oriented to important
civic, community and natural features.
• Develop West Bridge Park to accommodate significant and scheduled
downtown gatherings; focus efforts at East Bridge Park on becoming a
more passive escape from the activities of downtown.
• Develop a gathering space at a new City Hall to function as a
Monticello "town square."
• Develop a space in downtown that can accommodate a farmers mar-
ket.
• Allow for some downtown streets to be closed for larger community
gatherings and events.
• Utilize similar patterns and materials in the public gathering spaces as
found in the streets to make the gathering spaces feel like a natural
extension of the street.
2.4 Develop a street system to appropriate to a downtown environment.
• Maintain a regular spacing of streets and a grid patterns of streets and
blocks in downtown.
• Use traffic calming techniques to keep speeds of traffic at safe levels
and to encourage the use of "streets" by pedestrians.
• Allow and encourage on-street parking on downtown streets to
achieve traffic calming, to create a more active street environment, and
to make a better transition between traffic and pedestrians.
3.1 Establish common setback and lot coverage standards for each "district"
to ensure compatible and maximum development in downtown
Monticello
• Setbacks (minimum distance from aright-of--way in which no struc-
ture may encroach) and build-to lines (a line measured from the right-
of-way which at least 70 percent of the primary structure must touch)
for downtown "districts" are established as follows:
lZiverfront Build-to line: 0 feet
Broadway - "Downtown" Build-to line: 0 feet
Broadway - "East and West" Setback: Average of adjacent
structures, but no less
than 25 feet
Walnut Build-to line: 0 feet
Pine Setback: 20 feet
Seventh Street Setback: 20 feet
Transitional Setback: Average of adjacent
structures, but no less
than 20 feet
3.0
The Configuration of Sites
A New Bridge
RerRaQ~MonOcrQo's Duxntown aid RNehonl ~^-~
r~B~~ ~1q
•
A New Bridge
ReWfalf~rgMardkeOoY Damfown and Rherhad
Page,X~ f •- ~ '
Neighborhood Setback: Average of adjacent
strictures, but no less
than 20 feet
Industrial Setback: 20 feet for office use
related to industrial use;
50 feet for all other
uses and structures
Park and Open Space does not apply
Civic/Institutional Build-to line: 25 feet
• Street frontage "build-out" (that portion of the primary street frontage
which must be occupied by the primary structure at the build-to line or
which must have a portion of any building that meets the setback line)
is established for each district as follows:
Riverfront
Broadway - "Downtown"
Broadway - "East and West"
Walnut
Pine
Seventh Street
Transitional
Neighborhood
Industrial
Park and Open Space
Civic/Institutional
75 percent
100 percent, except that pedestrian pas-
sages and plaza spaces developed in
concert with buildings are exempt
does not apply
60 percent
20 percent
20 percent
does not apply
does not apply
does not apply
does not apply
40 percent
• Standards for minimum lot coverage by structures, in order to ensure
the best use of limited available land in downtown, are established as
follows (plazas, outdoor gathering or sales area are not included in
minimum coverage calculation):
Riverfront
Broadway - "Downtown"
Broadway - "East and West"
Walnut
Pine
Seventh Street
Transitional
Neighborhood
Industrial
Park and Open Space
Civic/Institutional
30 percent
30 percent, except that pedestrian pas-
sages and plaza spaces developed in
concert with buildings are exempt
does not apply
30 percent
20 percent
20 percent
does not apply
does not apply
25 percent
does not apply
exempt (to ensure these buildings can
remain prominent relative to other
downtown development and to allow
outdoor public spaces to be created on
these sites)
• Building footprint size and `bay width" (the width of a storefront or
segment of a continuous facade at which building must be divided) for
the primary structure on each site is as follows:
Riverfront 2,000 square feet minimum; 7,000
square feet maximum
25 foot to 40 foot bays
Broadway - "Downtown" 2,000 square feet minimum; 10,000
square feet maximum
20 foot to 50 foot bays
Broadway - "East and West" does not apply
Walnut 2,000 square feet minimum; 8,000
squaze feet maximum
25 foot fo 50 foot bays
Pine 3,500 square feet minimum; 7,000
square feet maximum
.-- requirement for bays does not apply
Seventh Street 3,500 square feet minimum; 65,000
square feet maximum
requirement for bays does not apply
Transitional maximum footprint no larger than 130
percent of the average of other struc-
tures within 250 feet of site
Neighborhood maximum footprint no larger than 115
percent of the average of other struc-
tures within 250 feet of site
Industrial does not apply
Park and Open Space does not apply
Civic/Institutional does not apply
3.2 Make buildings the focus of Monticello's downtown and riverfront, not
pazking azeas.
• Locate parking behind or beside buildings, with no more than 25 per-
cent of required pazking in a side yard in the Walnut, Broadway -
"Downtown" and Riverfront Districts, and no more than 75 percent in
a front yazd in the Pine and Seventh Street Districts).
• Prohibit pazking areas adjacent to intersections of streets.
• Require separation of parking areas from buildings and public side-
walks for landscaping and buffering.
• usual separation between parking areas and public rights-of--way shall
use landscape materials or ornamental fences (no berms such that a
screen that is at least 50 opaque is present in all seasons to a height of
28 inches to 36 inches).
3.3 Create parking to accommodate anticipated and realistic demands, with-
out overbuilding pazking facilities.
• Encourage development of joint-use pazking facilities, balancing use
A New Bridge
RMfaltrhgMonOaAos D and RNafiw-f
Page x+F?j : 3 ~
on a day-today and hour-to-hour basis to achieve the highest possible
use of each parking space created.
• Create pazking for office uses at rates between 3 and 4 spaces per 1000
square feet gross floor area; create parking for retail uses at rates
between 4 and 5 spaces per 1000 square feet gross floor area.
• Discourage development that would exceed or require normal peak
parking demand in order to keep development density intense.
• Include on-street parking that fronts each site in the calculation of
pazking provided for that site.
• Provide employee parking in remote areas to allow customer parking
nearest to the destination; prohibit employees from parking on down-
town streets.
• Create preferential parking zones in neighborhoods, if necessary.
3.4 Develop each site to facilitate traffic movement and reduce conflict
points.
~~~ • Provide full access to sites using cross streets; limit access to sites on
Pine Street to right in/out.
• Allow limited pazking lot access from Walnut and River Street.
• Allow pazking lot circulation at ends of parking aisles to utilize cross
streets, if necessary.
3.5 Establish continuity in the patterns of site development to maintain
coherency and cohesiveness in downtown.
• Establish a common palette of materials for sites in downtown (light-
ing, paving, landscape, signs, etc.)
Require that pazking lots be 25 percent shaded by trees within 10 yeazs
of development.
• Use landscaping or ornamental fencing to block view of bumpers and
grills of cars parked in lots adjacent to any public street.
• Use indigenous or proven native plant materials, focusing on species
related to the river or savanna environments.
• Encourage signs to be a part of the building rather than the site; allow
pylon signs for development on Pine Street and between Seventh
Street. and I-94 only.
4.0 4.1 Develop a unified character for all built elements of downtown to yield
The Design of Buildings the sense of a true downtown district.
• Formula and "corporate" architecture, franchise patterns and buildings
that are designed as signs shall be prohibited; building design shall
rely on "found" chazacter rather than introduced chazacter.
• New development shall be compatible with the intentions of the guide-
lines for each district, achieving compatibility though similar scale,
massing, bulk and detail.
• Buildings shall be organized with axes perpendicular to streets .
• Each building shall be encouraged to explore some level of individual
expression in order to reflect the sense of a downtown district rather
A New Bridge
~''"~ ReMhRbng Mar-UceOo's Downtown and R/mlraH
Page =s~ • ~~
than a strip center.
• Generally, commercial buildings (retail and office uses) in the
Riverfront, Broadway -"Downtown" and Walnut Districts shall have
flat roofs.
• No building shall exceed a height greater than three stories plus the
roof, except that buildings in the civic/institutional district may have
elements that exceed three stories.
• Awnings shall be allowed to be continuous only "storefronts" occupied
by a single tenant; awnings shall not be allowed to extend across the
face of more than one building, even if the buildings are occupied by
the same tenant.
• Detail shall be integral to the building, not elements that are applied to
a standard building shell (such as a clock tower or dormers with no
usable space behind).
4.2 Require the use of quality building materials and methods to create an
enduring stock of downtown buildings.
• Materials shall be durable;-easily maintained, attractive at close dis-
tances (for people walking on sidewalks or driving slowly on the
street, for example); materials shall be scaled to pedestrians when
structures are within 10 feet of a public right-of--way or a walkway that
is intended for public use (avoiding the use of "jumbo" brick in these
circumstances).
• Brick, stone, wood, EIFS or high quality precast concrete aze accept-
able finish materials; high quality metal (matte finish preferred) or
synthetic siding may be acceptable if used in combination with other
acceptable materials; wood frame or masonry construction is accept-
able.
• Transparent glass shall be used at the majority of street level windows;
mirrored glass at street level is not acceptable.
• Canvas awnings or extension of the roof material for awnings is
encouraged; nylon awnings or other synthetic materials, as well as
those awning structures meant to be illuminated from within, are not
acceptable.
4.3 Develop buildings that relate to people at all publicly visible sides; elim-
inate a "back door" appearance for service areas and rear entrances from
pazking lots.
• Facades facing streets or public walkways shall be articulated with
windows and doors resulting in a minimum of 40 percent window or
door azea at street level (sidewalk to 12 feet high); windows shall have
a generally vertical orientation.
• Entries shall be the highlight of the building.
• Mechanical systems shall be integrated into the design of the building.
• Trash storage areas shall be completely enclosed and incorporated as a
part of the building.
• Only those entrances that aze unlocked during regular business hours
may be considered public entrances.
• Signs shall be incorporated into the building facade, windows or
awnings up to a maximum of 1 square foot of sign area per linear foot
A New Bridge
Revlbaring MmtlceOo's Da~mfo~m and Rlverfmnt ~''`~
Pagearx 3 ; 32]
of street facade (at the front yard); signs that extend more than 12"
beyond the plane of the building facade or signs that extend beyond
the roof line aze not allowed, except that signs that project over the
sidewalk are allowed up to a maximum size of six square feet (marquis
excepted); signs that are within or a part of a window must maintain
70 percent clear area in the surface of the window; one sign will be
allowed for each usable public entry (signs that aze a part of an awning
or within or part of a window are encouraged and shall not be counted
in determining the number of signs allowed).
• Tenant signage for multi-tenant buildings shall occupy an area no lazg-
er than 3 square feet per tenant at each public entrance.
•Non-illuminated temporary signage shall be permitted for any tenant
of a building up to 6 square feet of sign face per tenant. Temporary
signage .shall not be attached to the building and, if placed in a public
right-of--way, shall maintain a minimum of 6 feet clearance for pedes-
trians. Such temporary signage shall be placed only during operating
hours.
~- • Temporary signage may be attached to the inside face of any window
at street level, provided that such signage does not obscure more than
50 percent of the total window area and does not remain in place
longer than 21 days (leasing or for sale signs exempt from time limita-
tlnnc),
• All buildings must be identified at each public entrance with its full
street address, in numbers and letters no smaller than 2 inches in
height and no larger than 4 inches in height. This signage shall not be
included in the total signage allowed.
' S.0 5.1 The Department of Interior "Standazds for Rehabilitation," which are
The Re-Use of Buildings universally recognized as guides for the conservation and preservation of
the heritage of a place, shall apply to the re-use of any structure within
the downtown area. The re-use and rehabilitation of a structure shall be
measured for appropriateness by means of the following tests, and may
apply equally to the development of new buildings in downtown:
• Use: A property should be used for its historic purposes, or a re-use
which requires minimal change to its character defining elements.
• Character: Historic character should be preserved by retaining historic
architectural features, rather than altering or replacing them.
• Authenticity: Changes that create a false sense of history, or copy ele-
ments from nearby or similar buildings shall not be undertaken. Each
property is a unique example of physical features, time and use.
• Evolution: Changes that have acquired historic significance in their
own right shall be retained and preserved.
• Distinctive features, finishes and craftsmanship that characterize the
property shall be preserved.
• Preservation: Deteriorated features shall be repaired rather than
replaced. If replacement is necessary, it should be selective rather than
total, and be substantiated by documented evidence of what was
authentically present.
A New Bridge
~^~ RevlbflrlngMa+lkd/o'SDOwnlownandRhaerhorrt
Page~~`_~~
• Cleaning: Use the gentlest means possible, avoiding chemical treat-
ments and absolutely avoiding any sandblasting.
• Archeological resources shall be protected and preserved, with mitiga-
lion techniques employed if resources must be disturbed.
• New work: Additions or alterations shall not destroy the historic
materials that chazacterize the property, and shall be differentiated
from the old, and yet be compatible with the massing, size, scale and
architectural features of the original structure.
• Reversibility: New work shall be applied such that, if removed in the
future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and
environment will be maintained.
5.2 The Department of Interior "Standards for Rehabilitation" and the
Guidelines which accompany them are the starting point for storefront
and downtown building design. However, in terms an approach (for
example, "where does one start?"), a process might be defined for re-
use. Restoration and renewal work shall follow these steps:
• Historic pictures and/or research to determine authenticity of work is
the most important starting point, thus avoiding guesswork, false
application of history or a restoration theme. It also helps all parties
visualize what is possible.
• In some cases, apply for Historic Structures Report grant to do a com-
plete analysis.
• Study and articulate what is original, what is not, what should be
retained and what is the character of the place.
• Develop a design concept based on this data and the use/re-use.
• Deal with code and technical matters as required using the appropriate
specialists.
5.3 In downtown, the two-level, two-use nature of some buildings is impor-
tant, thus each can be thought of as a "storefront" and an "upstairs,"
which may require dual re-use considerations, accessibility solutions and
other factors that might affect the re-use. Frequently the second level
fronts are less changed or easier to restore than the storefronts below.
• Image: The whole building works as the signature of the business(es)
present, and is one lazge "sign" of its presence, nature and viability.
• Storefronts: Maximize transparency, remembering that this is the
advertising of the inside, it is inviting and provides light outwazd in
the evenings.
• Signboazds: Typically signboazds are located just above the transpar-
ent storefronts. Small and interesting is better, with small spotlights
for illumination. No backlighted plastic signs shall be allowed.
Projecting signs (those that overhang the sidewallc) are acceptable as
described in Section 4.3.
• Awnings: Real, operable, fabric (canvas or stabilized natural fabric)
are encouraged if originally present or on new constriction. They pro-
vide shade, rain protection, assist in store/business recognition and
sign Iocations, and are a variable that is visually interesting. Awnings
~-
A New Bridge
Revlfa/trtrgAfadlaflo'S Down6owr-arMRlvrr/ront ~"-"`~ c
Pagexz?) :1'S
must not be regularized too much, nor become fixed or backlighting.
Awnings on re-use projects shall conform to the description in Section
4.1 and 4.2.
• Upper facade: Restore typical historic window patterns discovered in
old photos, restore top of wall detail or overhanging cornice work
which acts as the eye-catching finale to the storefront.
• Windows: Restore original (in whole or in part) or replicated windows
by conforming to sizes, profiles and divisions as observed from his-
toric photographs or drawings.
• Backsides of buildings: The aesthetic is different from the front, but
no less important. Usually simple and direct, this look, when cazefully
maintained, provides more of sculptural interest and intrigue (with
many ups and downs, ins and outs) than the street side.
• Energy conservation: Much restoration is also good for utility reasons
as well as for energy conservation. Window work is a first priority,
especially to reduce leaky conditions (infiltration). Frequently, exist-
ing windows can be rebuilt and refitted with weatherstripping and will
have years of good service. Attic or roof spaces are the other high pri-
ority. Wall azeas may not have a high proportion of exposure to the
outside, so may not require as much attention.
• Airlock/-vestibules: These are good for energy conservation and com-
fort reasons, but can be poorly designed with the facade ^: storefront
restoration. Airlocks and vestibules require extra care and considers
tion.
• Authentic materials: The very same materials as used originally are
best, but door and window materials may be painted metal instead of
wood so long as the size, shape and placement in opening are kept as
original. This is not automatic, and should be reviewed critically for
' approval. '
• Paint colors: Even though changeable, colors ought to be selected
from historic analysis of what is found at each site and architectural
feature. If not, then downtown trends will develop, or it will become
only a matter of individual (or committee) taste, rather than being
based on understandable principles. It is possible to develop a down-
town "palette" of colors, from which owners can make selections (thus
• being "pre-approved").
5.4 In the event that a historic building is relocated into downtown, care
should be exercised to make it fit the patterns of its new district.
• Downtown should never become the home for any old building from
the area which might face extinction. Buildings in downtown must fit
the use and character of downtown; therefore the "zoo effect" of
orphan old buildings must be avoided.
• If buildings are relocated into downtown, they shall conform the the
patterns of the underlying district (as described above).
6.0
Oversight of 6.1 )n order for these Design Guidelines to be effective in maintaining con-
' Design Guidelines sistency with the community's visions for its downtown and riverfront, a
A New Bridge
ReNhSdng ManflaeUo's Damtown arb R/wfiant
Page st- ~ .~ L
body must be charged with their oversight.
• The MCP Design Committee (or a subcommittee of the Design
Committee) is most knowledgeable about these Design Guidelines as
it is the group charged with creating them. It is logical to assume that
their continued input is a benefit to the downtown and riverfront as the
area moves through revitalization efforts.
• As an advisory committee, the MCP Design Committee could report
to the Planning Comnssion relative to any project undertaken in the
downtown and riverfront area. This process should be identified as a
regular part of the planning review process for projects within down-
town.
As the City considers assistance to developers of projects within
downtown, the MCP Design Committee could act as an advisory com-
mittee to the Economic Development Authority (the City body having
jurisdiction over the assistance that might be provided to developers).
Assistance should be tied to satisfaction of the Design Guidelines (as
well as conformance to the_vision and guiding principles for the down-
town and riverfront area).
6.2 Development projects need to be signaled early enough for the MCP
Design Committee to meet with potential developers to review the inten-
tions of the Design Guidelines.
The City's development process should include steps related to the
involvement of the MCP Design Committee for review of a develop-
ment plan.
• Meetings with developers should occur as one of the first steps in the
development process, allowing the developer to create plans that rec-
ognize the direction of the design guidelines.
• For any project that requires review by the Planning Commission, the
MCP Design Committee should prepare a written review of the plan,
identifying areas of conformance and/or nonconformance with the
design guidelines.
' For any project that requires assistance from the EDA, the MCP
Design Committee should prepare a written review of the plan, identi-
fying areas of conformance and/or nonconformance with the design
guidelines. `
b.3 The MCP Design Committee should establish a subcommittee that is
appointed by the City Council for a designated term to provide legitima-
cy, credibility and stability for implementation of these Design
Guidelines.
• In addition to the MCP Design Committee, members of a subcommit-
tee for design review should include representatives from the Planning
Commission and the Economic Development Authority.
• Terms of subcommittee members should coincide with terms of the
Planning Commission and EDA, with minimum terms of two years
and a maximum of three years. Terms of the members of the subcom-
A New Bridge
RevRa/h~gMar~lmlo'sDowntaimardRNafra~! ~'^~
Page-~x3 : 31
mittee should be staggered. For this subcommittee, there should be no
limit to the number of terms an individual may serve.
•
~~ .
A New Bridge
~'~~ ReNtaltdng tuoMkefla's t)arvnta-rn an0 Rtwlmnt
Page ~ _'~O`
EDA AGENDA
J[ILY 22, 1997
5. Consideration to aQpoint an EDA representative to the Design AdvisorXTeam.
A. Reference and Background:
As you will note in Section 6.3, Oversight of the Design Guidelines, it is suggested that an
EDA representative serve on the Design Advisory Team. An EDA appointment made at
this time would be with the assumption the Monticello Downtown and Riverfront Plan is
adopted as proposed. The term of this appointment as outlined would coincide with term
of the EDA member, with minimum term of two years and a maximum of three years.
No recommendation for the appointment is given. However, I believe Commissioner
Hoglund is a member of the MCP Design Committee.
6. Other Business:
Enclosed for your information is a copy of the check showing the balloon payment made
by Tapper's Inc. for GMEF Loan No. 001.
1
THIS WCUAtENT HAS AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK PRINTED ON TILE BACK; ABSENCF.OF THIS FEATURE W ILL INDICATE A corr.
U Marquette Bank,N.A.~~FO~ 479 5 9 3 0 2 7 6
osto 8200 Golden Valley Road 75-1238
Remitter 9 ~ 9
Minneapolis, MN 55427-4478 Date 3uly lei. 1997
Tappet's Revalvirg Laen
PAY TO THE
ORDER OF ~ig7 of lionticello ~ 72,g7b.91
I'
.•.
S
UVOuV°UV ~~0~~[r-~1 o LL,~
CASHIER'S CHECK
PURCHASER'S RECEIPT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SAVE THIS COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS
Marquette
U Bank,N.A.~~~
WE AvE CREDITED YO RICHE
CHECKING CREDIT
MEMORANDUM
UNT FOR:
Date, ~
'% ~ ~~-
m
~/ / //
•
x:09 LO L664 7~:
30
Marquette CHECKING DEBIT D~J- ~~
Bank,N.A.I~.,.~ MEMORANDUM
WE H VE CHARGED YOUR CHECKIIyIG ACCOU ;T FOR:
~- f ff ~ b-
- ~ i
AUT OR ED BY: JACCT ~ Q ~
," Y ' `^ DO NOT FAIL TO MAKE THIS ENTRY..IN-YOUR REGISTER. •,r - .' r
`i W ~'~
~Z ~~J x
t ` ~/~ ~ / I ~~J~ Dehtte N 94919 ~ .~
x:0910 ~6647~: 53
•,