IDC Agenda 02-03-2004AGENDA -ANNUAL MEETING
• MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Tuesday, February 3, 2004 - 7:00 a.m.
Academy Room - 505 Walnut Street
MEMBERS: 'r Mar Bare ice Chair Tom Lind ai Bill~per 'ck Van Al om Ollig, Don.R~erts,
ike enedetto arb Sc~entel Dan Olson elli Huxford, Tom~aski, an ynne Da
COUNCIL LIAISON: Mayor Bruce Thielen.
STAFF: Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, John Simola, Fred Patch, and Ollie Koropchak.
IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To maintain and increase the industrial tax base and to create jobs in the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
7:00 a.m. l . Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meeting.) ~ ~ b 0 ~ ~
7:02 ~ 2. Vote to approve the December 2, 2003 and January 6, 2004 IDC minutes.
7:05 `'~ ~~ ~~ Annual Meeting:
~~ ~~ ~~' ~~- A. Review and take action to amend or re-affirm the IDC 2003 Action Statement and
l~ ~ "r Organizational and Membership Guidelines. ~'
`~^~CJ B. Acceptance of IDC membership, three-year term -Barger, Van Allen, Olson, and
V
~
~' Schwientek. ~
~
.,~
~ Approve recommendation of the Membership Committee for replacement of
'
~ lender's occupation.
K'" C. Acceptance of Standing Committee Members: President or Chair of Chamber and
J`
/- ~ .
Mayor of Monticello.
~ ,, D. Election of 2004 IDC Officers: Chair, Vice Chair, and Secretary.
~ \/ ~
7:20 4. Follow- up and discussion of the City Council action to authorize a purchase agreement
-~~ for acqu isition of industrial land.
A. Feedback on lobbying the council of benefits to city-owned industrial land.
~neva - c,~`~}ate,"'
~
`~ ~` `~"~ Feedback on Council and Small Group workshop (January 26) for explanation of
~ latest City offer (non-binding letter of intent) and financing options.
~ ~ 4 'n ~ ~~
~
C. Response from Chadwick to City January offer (Option l and 2).
C
D. Input from Tapper and Roberts to JOBZ Tax-Free Zones. - ~`~ '~~"`~s'
-~
E. ,, T
Preparation for Council meeting of February 9, 2004. ~ ~ ~~ ~"t'"~ ~~`~"
a~ ~ ~ a..~ Cry, i 'CL-~,,.~....~ ? 5 `~' "-',Q
7:50 5. Updates by Mayor Thielen:
A. Update on annexation.
B. Meeting of city officials to set 2004 Council's Community Vision & Governing
Policies.
C. Update on the proposed I-94 and County Rd 18 interchange and I-94 realignment
8:05 6. Reports:
A. Economic Development Report -Koropchak.
B. Membership Committee -January 22, 2004.
8:10 7. Review the draft copy of the February 3, 2004 Planning Commission Agenda for industrial
related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if necessary.
8:20 8. Other Business.
Chamber Updates - Feaski.
Next IDC meeting, Tuesday, March 2, 2004, 7:00 a.m.
8:30 9. Adjournment.
~~
MINUTES
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Tuesday, December 2, 2003 - 7:00 a.m.
Academy Room - 505 Walnut Street
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Mary Barger, Vice Chair Tom Lindquist, Bill Tapper, Dick
Van Allen, Mike Benedetto, Dan Olson, and Tom Feaski.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Tom Ollig, Don Roberts, Barb Schwientek, Kelli Huxford, and
Lynne Dahl.
COUNCIL LIAISON ABSENT: Mayor Bruce Thielen.
STAFF PRESENT: Ollie Koropchak.
IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To maintain and increase the industrial tax base and to
create jobs in the City of Monticello, Minnesota.
1. Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meeting.)
Chair Barger called the IDC meeting to order at 7:03 a.m.
2. Vote to approve the November 4 2003 IDC minutes.
TOM FEASKI MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 4, 2003 IDC
MINUTES. SECONDED BY MIKE BENEDETTO AND WITH NO CORRECTIONS
OR ADDITIONS, THE MINUTES WERE APPROVED AS WRITTEN.
;. Follow up and discussion of the City Council action to authorize a purchase agreement
for acquisition of industrial land.
A. Results of meeting between Industrial Group and Chadwick.
Chair Barger reported that the City Council tabled any action on the acquisition of
industrial land until February 9, 2004, in order to first review costs associated with the
proposed I-94/County Rd 18 interchange. They also noted to continue negotiations with
Chadwick. Barger continued stating the Small Group met with the Council prior to the
regular Council meeting. We were looking for more support from the Council and felt
their decision was already made. Since Cotulcil action, the Small Group met with John
Chadwick and he agreed to extend his Letter of Intent through February 10, 2004, with
the right to continue marketing the property. Administrator Wolfsteller prepared a non-
binding Letter of Intent (counter-offer) and this was submitted to Chadwick the
Wednesday prior to Thanksgiving. The following assessment was made: 1. Council
overwhelmed and confused, not against purchase. 2. Need to simply presentation. 3.
Purchase Agreement to progressive and binding for Council. 4. Council not convinced
. government should own and develop land. 5. Financing method unclear.
B. Where to ~o from here.
The IDC agreed to lobby the Council Members individually and to request Council
representation on the Small Group. Members fitrther agreed for the need to first sell the
IllC MINUTES - 12/02/03
Council on the concept and to develop bullet points for lobbying:
• Why city-owned industrial park is good for the community?
• How to finance the acquisition and improvements? An investment for the future.
• High cost of infrastructure discourages privately-owned parks.
• Along-term vision.
• Research competition.
Tapper noted with the American industries going to China, we need to look to the future
and what's next? Large buildings may not be the need. Feaski sees a successful and
desired industrial market at 10,000 to 25,000 sq ft, outside dumpsters, and asteam-line
Planning/Council process. Shawn Weinard still appears interested in swapping the
Monticello Commerce Center for the City/Remmele parcel. Theundeveloped land of the
Monticello Commerce Center is proposed to be assessed for the interchange. Mike
Benedetto and Tom Feaski volunteered to lobby Council members. It was suggested to
start with Mayor Thielen and Council member Brian Stumpf and to involve Rick
Wolfsteller. Van Allen volunteered to lobby Carlson.
4. Updates by Mayor Thielen:
A. Pro ress of annexation agreement and future township/city council meetings.
With the absence of Wolfsteller and Thielen, Koropchak noted the meeting between the
City, Township, and representatives from St. Michael and Frankfort was held as
scheduled. The visiting representatives shared their annexation experiences and
suggested the use of the word "merger" rather than annexation. Koropchak asstuned
Wolfsteller was at the Wright County Board meeting this morning as the Board will
consider a resolution opposing Monticello's annexation.
B. Meeting of city officials to set 2003 Council's Communty Vision & Governing
Policies.
Not scheduled.
C. Update and progress on the proposed I-94 and County Rd 18 interchange and I-94
realignment.
Traffic Study, estimated interchange costs, and sources of funds under study.
5. Keports:
A. Economic Development Report.
The IDC accepted the report as written. Additionally, Koropchak noted the January IDC
meeting is the annual meeting. Those individuals whose terms expire December 31 are
Mary Barger, Dick Van Allen, Dan Olson, and Barb Schwientek. Chamber
representative is either Chamber President or Chair. Election of officers are also held at
the annual meeting.
Van Allen reported he toured Cargill Kitchens in Big Lake and noted the review process
time by the City to accommodate the developer's desired shipment date. Additionally,
Van Allen reviewed the Performance Measure of the Big Lake Industrial Park.
B. Marketing Subcommittee.
Tom Lindquist reported the Marketing Committee partnered with the Chamber for
design and placement of a billboard along I-94 near Albertville. The billboard will
promote the Trumpeter Swans.
2
IDC MINUTES - 12/02/03
6. Discussion on and to continue development of a list of potential tasks to accomplish the
oal of the IDC: To rovide a continuous stream of available industrial land with
infrastructure potential.
A. Review the draft coRy of the December 2 2003 Planning Commission Agenda for
industrial related items Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if
necessary.
With no industrial items on the Planning Commission Agenda of December 2, 2003, no
discussion or action was required.
Other Business.
Chamber Updates -Chamber Chair Feaski gave the following update: Home for the
Holidays is December 5; billboard promoting the trumpeter swans expected to be up
within a week; Chamber Banquet scheduled for January 24 includes silent auction and
casino night. This the Chamber's biggest fund-raiser.
Adjournment.
TOM LINDQUIST MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE IDC MEETING.
SECONDED BY DAN OLSON AND WITH NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE IDC
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:40 A.IvI.
•
fJ~ e ~~
chak Recorde~
Ollie Korop ,
MINUTES -ANNUAL MEETING
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Tuesday, January 6, 2004 - 7:00 a.m.
Academy Room - 505 Walnut Street
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chair Tom Lindquist, Bill Tapper, Mike Benedetto, Barb
Schwientek, Kelli Huxford, and Lynne Dahl.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Mary Barger, Dick Van Allen, Tom Ollig, Don Roberts, Dan
Olson, and Tom Feaski.
COUNCIL LIAISON ABSENT: Mayor Bruce Thielen.
STAFF PRESENT: Jeff O'Neill and Ollie Koropchak.
IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To maintain and increase the industrial tax base and to
create jobs in the City of Monticello, Minnesota.
1. Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meeting.)
In the absence of the IDC Chair, Vice Chair Tom Lindquist called the IDC meeting to order at
7:00 a.m.
2. Vote to approve the December 2, 2003 IDC minutes.
No action taken due to a lack of quorum.
Schwientek and Tapper indicated they would not be present at the February IDC meeting.
Feaski will also be absent.
3. Annual Meeting:
A. Review and take action to amend or re-affirm the IDC 2003 Action Statement and
Organizational and Membership Guidelines.
B. Acceptance of IDC membership, three-year term -Barger, Van Allen, Olson, and
Schwientek..
B. Acceptance of Standing Committee Members: President or Chair of Chamber and
Mayor of Monticello.
C. Election of 2004 IDC Officers: Chair, Vice Chair, and Secretary.
Tapper asked if he was off the IDC due to poor attendance and if Ollig is still on a leave of
absence?
No action was taken on A., B., or C. due to a lack of quorum. The Membership Committee
of Barger, Lindquist, and Olson will meet sometime before the February IDC meeting.
1
IDC Minutes - 01/06/04
•
4. Follow-up and discussion of the City Council action to authorize a purchase agreement for
acquisition of industrial land.
A. Follow-up of second meeting between Industrial Group and Chadwick.
Koropchak reported the Small Group including Mayor Thielen met with Chadwick and Billouta
on December 19, 2003. Chadwick presented acounter-offer. Major points within
Chadwick's counter-offer included: increased per sq ft acquisition cost, changed infrastructure
costs and assessment ratios, advanced closing date, and extended time for mining and hauling.
The Small Industrial Group set January 8, 2004, at 4:00 p.m. to review the City's prepared
response prior to submission to Chadwick.
B. List of bullet points for lobbying.
Chair Barger preparing the bullet points.
C. Lobby efforts and next scheduled Small Group meeting and Council workshop.
At the December 19 meeting, Mayor Thielen suggested a closed workshop with Council
members at 5:00 p.m. prior to the Council meeting of January 26, 2004. Mayor Thielen felt
Council members would be more at ease to ask questions in a closed session. Wolfsteller to
check with the City Attorney on legality of a closed meeting. According to the Attorney, a
closed meeting of the full Council for this purpose is illegal. Closed workshop only for purpose
of litigation. Given this information and without list of bullet points, Benedetto, Feaski, and Frie
will be notified of plans for lobbying individual Council members after the January 8 Small
Group meeting. Koropchak distributed a report from the Economic Development Partnership
of Wright County listing Wright County cities who owned industrial land and the acreage.
Updates by Mayor Thielen:
A. Update on annexation.
In the absence of Mayor Thielen, Deputy Administrator O'Neill reported that the City is
preparing a pamphlet of questions and answers most frequently asked about annexation. The
pamphlet will be mailed to residents within the proposed 11,000 acre annexation area. As part
of the mediation process and beginning in late January, three to four meetings will be scheduled
between the city and township to negotiate an agreement.
B. Meeting of city officials to set 2003 Council's Community Vision & Governing Policies.
None.
C. Update on the proposed I-94 and County Rd 18 interchange and I-94 realignment.
O'Neill reported on January 12, 2004, the Council will be asked to authorize completion of a
benefit analysis for the proposed interchange which is anticipated to take about four to six
months. Because MDOT has not determined if the realignment of I-94 will go over or under the
railroad tracks nor has the proposed folded interchange at County 18 been approved and the
City not received the completed appraisal for ready mix facility; interchange development costs
remain a moving target and are difficult to estimate. Initially, the City was hopeful to begin
construction of the interchange in 2004, but realistically it now appears 2005.
2
IDC Minutes - 01/06/04
6. Reports:
A. Economic Development Report.
Koropchak reviewed the written report which was acceptable to those present.
7. Review the draft co~y of the January 6, 2004 Planning Commission Agenda for industrial
related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if necessary.
In a housing mix study completed, the City of Monticello had a little higher than average of
attached homes except for St. Michael which has 12.5% attached homes and 87.3%
detached single family homes.
Given the Planning Commission will discuss an acceptable mix of single family and attached
housing in low density residential districts, O'Neill distributed tables showing the development
project housing mix for low density areas as of January 5, 2004 and the proposed phasing
inventory for 2004. The January 5, 2004 table identified 9 residential developments for a total
of 1,425 units (detached single family 875 and town homes 550) fora ratio of 1.59:1. The
proposed phased 2004 table identified the same 9 residential developments for a total of 710
units (detached single family 411 and town homes 299) for a ratio of 1.37:1. The City defines
low density residential development as three units per gross acre and/or four units per net acre.
A guide ratio of 2:1. Through the use of a PUD and a large area development, the definition
has been construed differently by some developers resulting in higher density. The question is:
What is the proper mix? Lindquist said he would not invest in an expensive home with town
home development around the fringes but instead would select a lot with direct access to a
detached single family development. Developers are looking for a fast turn-around of their
investment, complete the project, and leave the community. The City needs to plan for
development which benefits the community long-term. Benedetto noted that if not for open
enrollment, the Monticello School District would have a declining enrollment while neighboring
school districts are growing. Town home developments attract retirees and low-incomes. The
Planning Commission will discuss this issue of an acceptable mix of housing at their regular
meeting tonight at 6:00 p.m. Additionally, O'Neill informed the IDC that a contractor is
submitting a revised village concept (commercial, housing, recreational mix) for the Schluender
property. This village concept defined in the Guide Plan is a mixed commercial, high density
neighborhood use with some detached single-family housing on the fringe.
8. Other Business.
O'Neill reported that the Parks Commission is introducing a park dedication fee for
commercial development but not for industrial development.
U
3
IDC Minutes - 01/06/04
Chamber Updates - Koropchak reminded IDC members to sign-up and support for the
upcoming Chamber Banquet on January 24 at Silver Springs Golf Course. Casino Night and
Silent Auction.
9. Adjournment.
With no further discussion, the IDC meeting adjourned at 8:50 a.m.
~~ ~ d~ ~ CJ~-~
Recorder
•
4
3 A.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
2003 ACTION STATEMENT
Mission Statement
To maintain and increase the industrial tax base and to create jobs in the City of Monticello,
Minnesota.
Purpose
To operate as an independent lobbying organization structured to influence and assist industrial
development in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota. In the broadest context focus on
overall industrial development and developers.
Goals and Direction
1. To provide a continuous stream of available industrial land with infrastructure potential.
2. To review and assess the implementation of the industrial marketing plan developed in
conjunction with the HRA for the City of Monticello.
3. To rate the effectiveness of the use of the industrial marketing plan.
4. To assign time and effort when and where it is deemed necessary to accomplish industrial
- development.
3A,
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
ORGANIZATIONAL AND MEMBERSHIP GUIDELINES
[. Meetin~Time and Place: Regular meetings are held the first Tuesday of each month at
7:00 a.m. in the Monticello City Hall, Academy Room. Special meetings may be called
by the Chairperson and Executive Director.
II. Objective: As written and adopted by the Annual Industrial Development Committee
Action Statement.
III. Committee Size: While there is no set or definite size established, it is generally
understood that the committee will not exceed 16-18 members.
IV. Make-up the Committee: Committee members must either work or reside in the
community of greater Monticello. Individuals who are involved in an occupation or
profession that provides services to the community of Monticello but is not headquartered
within the community may also serve as members of the committee.
Standin~~Committee Members:
President or Chair of the Monticello Area Chamber of Commerce.
Mayor of the City of Monticello. Non-voting.
City Staff Members: Non-voting.
Administrator of the City of Monticello.
Assistant Administrator of the City of Monticello.
Economic Development Director of the City of Monticello.
Chief Building Official of the City of Monticello.
V. Officers: The Chairperson, the Vice Chairperson, and the Secretary shall be elected
annually at the January meeting. Length of office term shall not exceed three consecutive
years.
Minutes of each meeting are the responsibility of the Secretary. Committee
correspondence are the responsibility of the Economic Development Director.
VI. Length of Membership Term: Members shall serve for three year terms on a three year
rotating basis so that approximately one-third of the membership expires each year.
Individuals wishing to continue serving on the committee may so indicate prior to the
expiration of their term. Any member wishing to relinquish his/her position on the
Industrial Development Committee may do so by submitting a letter of resignation.
VII. Filling a Vacant Position: A list of potential committee members shall be kept by the
Executive Director. The Industrial Development Committee must confirm all new
members by a majority vote.
IDC ORGANIZATIONAL/MEMBERSHIP GUIDELINES.
PAGE 2
VIII. Membership Attendance: In order to make a positive contribution to the committee,
each member is expected to attend at least 75% of the meetings in any given year. A year
is defined as beginning on the 1st of January and ending the 31 th of December.
3 R.
2003 IDC Monthly Attendance
This is prin ted only as an informative report relative t o the I DC Guidelines
knowing individuals participate in other functions of the IDC.
No
Jan Feb Mar Aur May Jun Jul Auk Sep Oct Nov llec
Mtg
Ollig A A A A LOA P
Van Allen P P P P P P P P P P P
Doty A
Lindquist P P P P P P A P P A P
Tapper P P A A A P A A A P P
Roberts P A P P P A P A P P A
Benedetto P P P P P A A A P P P
Barger P P P P P P A P P P P
Schwientek P A P A P P P A P P A
Olson P P P P P P P P P P P
Huxford P A P A A A A A P P A
Dahl P P P P P A P P P A
Chamber A A P P P P P P P P P
Council
Liaison
A
A
P
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
P =PRESEN T
A= ABSENT
30~C.
IDC MEMBERSHIP
2003
VOTING MEMBERS
TERM MEMBERS
December 2003 Mary Barger
Dick Van Allen
Dan Olson
Barb Schwientek
December 2004 Tom Lindquist
Tom Ollig
Don Roberts
Lynne Dahl
December 2005 Bill Tapper
Mike Benedetto
Kelli Huxford
Standing Member Tom Feaski
.NON-VOTING MEMBERS
City Council Liaison Bruce Thielen
Executive Director Ollie Koropchak
Support Staff Rick Wolfsteller
Jeff O'Neill
Fred Patch
John Simola
OCCUPATION
Industrial, Manufacturer
Industrial, Manufacturer
Service, Insurance
Health Care
Service, Lender
Service, Utility
Industrial, Manufacturer
Service, Print/Marketing
Industrial, Manufacturer
Education
Service, Utility
Service, Lender
Chamber Chair
Mayor
IDC Agenda - 02/3/04
6A. Executive Director's Report:
A. Jobz Minnesota -Attached is a brochure prepared by MEED marketing the newly designated
tax-free zones program. The ten tax-free zones are located in the Greater Minnesota and
exclude the 11 metro-counties. St. Cloud `s Fingerhut site and two downtown sites also
received designation. The program is modeled after the State of MI and PA programs.
However, the PA designations include both Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. In lieu of the City
looking to acquire land for industrial development, do you think this program has an impact on
the success of Monticello's potential? I did fax this to Don Roberts, Sunny Fresh, and Bill
Tapper, Genereux Fine Wood Products, for input. This is the program used to keep Polaris
and Anderson from expanding to WI. The intent of the program was for distressed areas in
Greater MN.
B. Demographic Change in MN -Attached info for your information. A. and B. were topics of
discussion at the EDAM Conference I attended last week.
C. United Properties -January 8 met with an individual (marketing, planning, and development)
looking along the I-94 corridor for 50 to 500 acres to purchase for future light industrial
development. Monticello the farthest out. They need to purchase land for .25 to .50 psf prior to
infrastructure improvements in order to snake numbers work. Example of parks developed:
Lake Elmo 125 acres (purchased land in 1970 and infrastructure improvements mid 1990's,
park filled in four years. Mendota Heights 250 acres, Shakopee 112 acres (lost General Mills
or was it Motors to WI). Sites suggested Osowski, Pauman, Gold Nugget, and informed of
city's negotiations and asked about potential partnership with city. Mailed info. His perspective:
With the demand for residential development, land prices have sky-rocketed and City's cave-in
to development pressure and re-zone industrial land to residential and commercial zoning.
D. Also noted in the Tribune is the Governor's idea for incentives such as paying relocation
expenses for the executives ofbio-science companies. As you recall Minneapolis, St Paul, and
Rochester received bio-science designation due to close proximity to medical research.
E. The Governor's economic development priority is to invest in a cluster that has strong presence
in Minnesota. A meeting is scheduled in St. Cloud on Feb 4: Can the St Cloud area participate
in the Governor's Bioscience Initiative? Representatives of the St. Cloud Area Bioscience
Initiative will give the presentation.
F. Block 52 -Met with the developer for Walgreens. No options on properties except for
Johnson's. Looking at building size configurations to fit various site configurations. Advised of
TIF deadlines: Bond refinancing May 1 and expenditures by June 30, 2004. The Council
approved zero lot setbacks on Highway 25 for Block 52.
G. Wright County Partnership and myself setting up tour with MEED Commissioner Mark Kramer
of Wright County industries. Target date February 9.
H. Industrial updates:
Production company with 40 jobs -average wage $18.50. No decision but serious about
Monticello. Looking at Remmele building.
Small fabricating company with 7 jobs at about $20 per hour -Called and talked about potential
of city-owned industrial park. Some interest. Timing may be issue.
Custom Sheet Metal -Called and talked about potential city-owned industrial land.
H-Window -Real estate agent has production company looking to lease building. Has inquired
to building plans and w/s information at City Hall. I believe it's for the entire building. Won't
give name of company at this point.
I. Chadwick parcel -The City submitted an option a. and option b. to Chadwick on January 22.
This is the 2-3 revised letter of intent to purchase. Chadwick on vacation til January 26. Four
individuals (Barger, Frie, Van Alle ,and Benedetto) are lobbying the council members
individual) for the ur ose o W, ro~ ~
y p p g: ~he benefits of City-owned land for industrial
development. The Small Group will host a workshop with Council members at 5:30 p.m. and
6:30 p.m. on January 26 for purpose of updating and answer/question period relative potential
acquisition of land. The Council tabled any action to purchase from the December 8, 2003, to
February 9, 2004 meeting.
J. Marketing Committee -Need to schedule meeting. F-.~.Q~ A( R~,'3 ~ SJ~r+~-
K. Community Profile -Letters were mailed to businesses for update of number of jobs and wage
levels as well as to appropriate organizations. Last update 2000.
•r
~. ,,
^• ,.:
F
0 'j.
h
^~
~:;7
f' ~
w
z
3
C vii
c
__ GJ
v a
o ~
~
~ a o
ooN~
E~ ~ E
~ ~
o p C `+-
~, y o
0
~ ~~
~
~ ,a
i
~ ~
C
?~ +,
~ ~~ 7 C
E o
~ -° v > ~
v
C
v
v ~ ~ ~
~
~ c ~ y c ~ a~
~
~
a~ L+ c b9
o c o 0
~' U >' ~
a~ ~ a E ~~'
r ~ ~
ro o
X ~ T
~ O
v r ~ '~
~ ~
~'
~ ~
n v ~ v
° ~ v a~
c
C ~ o
N ~ 5 ~
O
~ ~ ~
[ ~
3 0 ~
~~ s '"
V ~
0
N
c
"c
C
>,
O
a
'~7
=Y
C
~.
a
I~,
V
V
Q
A
3
+.~ u..
~ ~ ~ ~ U
G C
~ ~ E 3 N ~
~ v
~ O
~ N
c ~ ~
~
~ ca ~ '-
oO
~ ro >
ro
> ~
o o ~
~
~ ,~
~ ~
~ v o ~
a ~ o
~ ~
N u
~ ~ O ~
• ~ -
•
... `
N ~ O O
3
L y
~ ~ ~
~
C N
o ~ :c ~, ~
~ v
C a; o ,~ u ~ v
~ `n ~, `~' ~ K+ G
~ v, u ~ ~ c ~
~' ~ ~ ~ o O v
E
~
C
x• ~ o
rtf ~~~
~ N N N ~'
it
~ p
C ~ v ~
C ~ C
'~' ~ ~
c ~ N ,'~,
N > ~ ~ ~ n -c
•
0 00~~ ~ov
.. e. U ~ ~ a '!.'
~a
F- °
N
•O C_
~ I ~
W `°
,Z
0
a
~Z
- o
v o
> c
.~~~ ~' o
Co u
G ~
N ,~
~ ~ ~
~'~ N
t.,
~ d ~
~ O
~ ~ ~
d ~
~,~
o ~ ~
C ~ ~
~~
~~..
~~
`'
k`Yu
M-
r,
a.
3
v
v ~ ~
ti w `~ 3
~ ~ c ti
3 ~ ~a ~
c
~ c c =
~, ~ w = o
L
m
O ~ ~ N
' v
~ vc L
v
~ ~ ~ c
N ~' ~ ~ a~
C u v v ~
" ~ a
~
~ ~, o v
S ~
m 3 v
~ a~ ~ ~
N N ~y U O
rt rC o ~ bq
~ v~ ~c+'
O o
~' ffi~
'~ '~~
v
o
. ;
,
O o
o ~~
~ ~, .~_
c ~
of v~ +~ ~ M
v v ~ °o
c
v = o a N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
c ~ > ~
~ O ~ ~ ~
h T' O ~
O Q ~ U O
O bQ ~ +~+ y
~ N N ~
o ~ c ~ •c
c ~ ~' u a ~
C + Q. ~O-' C
~~•>uw~
~ee see
G1 N
~' ~ ~
~ ~ o
r ~
~ ~
++ `
.~ ~ •
~ ~ o ~
~ C
C ~ *~'
~ 'G
~ ~ Z Q
~ ,~ ~
4~ 0 ~
c
o v c ~
m
C ~ O ~
~~ ~v~i
e®e
L j vii
~ ~
~ c
v >, ~
C ~
C ~ T
+' c
G
vi ~ ~ 7
~ ~
~ ~ ~ C
O
0
c ~
v~ ~~
530
P®P
V
3
Q
Nw [~w•
"~ ~ ;
o '~~
0
w
•
e~ W
r? ~ N ~ 0
W o ~ a ~-
~ ~ E
V
d~~ ~ yN N~ V
~~~\ y >.-. ...N ~
°$~ ~ N~
~
' '" t!1 'vim ~
_
~ ^ ~ o G~
N C
C
~i
~J^
`~ E ~'~ ~ ~ ~n
.
^-
-
`o v
~ o c
U 7 ~ m
~
O VII G ~ u, ~
y ~ o v~ oo C.
~ o~
Y g
N
0
m N
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
~ -o 0 o m m o o w m
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
w~ 37 ~ o p o ~ ~ vi
O fO 0 0' W ^' ~ W n
9 w o' w O N m ~ ~. ~
~ ^000 000 '~ m 000 ~ O
~ ca N D W ~ N W O
N p' Ai c ~ N c
m n ~ ~
N ~ W '~
L O +~ O
O ~
o ~
N ~
n
O
Od
O
ono
f~
O ~p
in ''`~'
•~_~r,
0
n
2
rr
a f D t~C
~- .~
~ ~ ~
~ N ~
0
f_ ~ N
.y
O
~ = C
~, ~ ~
C n O
C lD ~
~:
rt ~
S ~ N
~ rt O
~, 'C
o r°n 3
'^ ~ c
+~ < ~
~ A
Q' ~ O
~ @.
N = ri
~. O ~
~~
A+
N ~
~G
n~O
W _•
N~
lD 7
fD ,_,
~- o
~ N
~ N
C
~ ~
~ ~
/ g O ~' ~ 0 rT
`Z (D
~ { E~ ~t N~~ O
~
~ ~ _ 3 ~ o
1
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ lD A+ e-r
3~~ m ~
~4~
i ¢ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ Q
+
~ ~f ~~~r r
i ~
~
~ ~
~v
i
7 A
Y
~ ~ O vii ?' ~
.;. .;.
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ 2 0
~ '~ S ~
~ ~ ~ 'D
`G
( ,,t ~
0 lD
,~ o ~
~ ~
0 0 a+
n
~
~ rn
o ,
~° ~
~ ~
rn
_ __
.
~ _.~s_
-
rn o -
rn
~ ~
~ ~
~ _
' ~ o
?~
+ 3 ~ ~ ~ r O ~
~
N .
`__. ~ „
~ .
_. r
~ ~ 3
7 C 3 C C .fir A+
a
C 3
rr ~
rr a
--I ~
'*+ ~ ~ ~
-i
~'
~ ~ ~ ~ rn 3, ~C
o U 3 ~
~ fD ~ ~
3 n
- --
-, -
~ - ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ k O ~'
irl
'a
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ r O
s
~' y
~
S ~
-' n
~ O
O
co ~
fD
o ~
~ (~
~
~ 3
~ ~ O O
_
~ ~
rn fD
~
°
V
N
~. -`"
~ ~
~ a ~
o
cue ,.~ w ~ n -o ~ -a
a ~ Z
~
<
~
~
a °
~
r°
0 0 -o a+
~
~ -i
m
C
U7 ~ (D Q7
(D X
o N O
a
iA
V7 fA W W
W b`>
S S 8
... .,
~ .,
~~ .,
;o .:. ~
a 3
~~ ~ ~
_ ~ a
Ai
c N L
oo
!~ N ~n
go ~ ~
~o E
~ ~
~ ~
~
$~ 3 "~ gO
' 3 ~ r
4
~ n
o~
In ~ ~ .~.
"°
N~
' a tNn
ua
O 8
O b
' ~
N N
O ~
~`
~ ~
O ~•fi
U ~,QP,
UQ ~
N
W
A ~
O
P.
„
S
fD
a
Q ~ Q
a A _
~
o
3 "'
N
~ {{p
DD~
~ O
7 ~ C
fH
' W p
8
~ ~
(p 'D
G _•
~_ fOD
- 7
~
8 w
~ ~ N w
p• ~ 3` °
~ ~ j
N n
5..., V+
r;'~
O
N =.
O
C<
~ y
~'. O
~° O ~
~
g
A
' ~
~ ~
3
a A
`
O
_ '
2'~
~a _
o
~
_„
x >. _
c N 0 O ~ ~ N O
-< ~ D n ~ ~ o
°~ ~ Z ~ ~
o O ro
__ ~
~ o
_ '~
~
~ m
~
~~ s
o ~ ~ Q yy~
~
~ w <
c X N
o ~ ?' ~
T C
U7 ~ O
o ~ ~
T ~
il)
r"F
bs y+ ~ fn v+ ~+
~ V
,P N G~
S ~ 8 8 8 8
3.~ ~ 3
'D ~
7 ~ N O
~~
N C N ~
O O .~+
~ ~ O
Y~
~ y
~ ~~
O f ~
~ <~
~ T ~
~ ~s
3 `~ ~
N 7
O
A
8 ~^
~ wo
~ ~.
~ ua
N ~ O
~ `~ ~
~~ a
N
O
~_
2~
~ 3
~ o
.7
W ~
V N
~ _sh+
r~
~~
c
O
M
O
3
0
7
C1 k
~~
~~ ~ ° ~
~~ N
N O ~ ~~~-",`s
o
8~ ~ ~ ~
(i ~ S •~ ~
o. ~,, A~
TS() t 1
~!Q C 1/
r <., !'1
a Z
~_ ~ a
~ a ~_ `ni
O L'
H
s
y
O
"'~
~~
O
V1 R~1
O
..
~``
`~
•~
~v
y
r-1
LJ
Demographic Change In
Minnesota
Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer
Mn Dept of Administration
January 2004
Minnesota Grew Faster Than Its
Neighbors ApI r-i1-2000 to July 2002
Wisconsin I _ __ ~t.a%
Iowa j ! oo ax
South Dakota j ~ uaX
4.3%~ NOrtfiUta.~
Minnesota j+n•;
UnitetlStates ----.- ~zsx
-2% -1% 0% 1% 2% 3%
Percent Change 2000.2002
to 'F3,
Minnesota Growing But More
Slowly
• Population growth in 9Os exceeded 1.2% per
year adding 54,400 per year
• Last year population grew by 0.7% adding
34,7000
• Biggest change is migration, which is driven
by the economy
• Last year lost net 7,700 to domestic
migration; gained 14,600 international
migrants
The Growth Collar Grew rapidly In The 90s
While Growth Was Modest Elsewhere
Mpls + SL Paul
Older Ikveloped
Suburbs
Growth collar
Rest of Ne State
4.6 %
1
~!1
h ~''~:a
f
j ' w
~>
+
Twin Cities Area Counties In The Top
100 Growth Counties Nationally
National Rank 2000-02 Growth
Scott, Mn 8th 6.4%
Sherburne, Mn 29th 5.1%
Wright, Mn 42nd 4.6%
Isanti, Mn 84th 3.7%
St. Croix, Wi 90th 3.7%
census Bureau ear ores. Dory 2 orr»r mumiss n, rns 5 ware ar.a maes me liar
•
•
2
From April 2000 to July 2002,
Minnesota added 105,000
People. 44% of the increase
Was in minority persons.
Newly released data from the Department of
Homeland Security shows 13,522 legal
immigrants from 160 countries arrived in
Minnesota in 2002 -the highest number of
legal immigrants since 1982 and 2,000
more than in 2001. Total immigrants to the
U.S. in 2002 were nearly 600 less than for
2001.
Minnesota Is Becoming More Diverse
Twin City = t7.9x .
Metro t5.9%
9.7%
f --'~-""?`1 ss% ®200 Labor Force
Minnesota 11.9% ^2000 Total
sax ^ ~g90 Total
. z~.2%
U:S. 90.9%
24.4%
0% to% 20% 30% 40%
Percent Minority
Projections For 2010--Population
• Projected 2010 population for the state is
5,452,500. In 2000 we had 4,919,479.
• Projected increase for the decade is
533,000 people or 11
• Through July 2003, we increased by
140,000 or 2.8%. We are about 20,000
under our projected track for the decade.
3
Projection For 2010--Households
• Projection for 2000 is 2,182,200, an
increase of 287,100 or 15.1 % for the
decade.
• Biggest increases will be in married
couples without children, up 23%, and
people living alone, up 21 %.
• These two groups will account for more
than 80% of the change.
Projections for 2010-Labor Force
• Labor force will increase to a range of 2,891,900
and 3,112,800, increases of between 7% and
1 s°i°.
• Uncertainty about labor force growth results from
uncertainty about migration and labor force
participation, especially over 60.
• Most growth will be among 45 to 64 (increase of
32% to 39%). Age 24 to 44 will see a decline as
much as 10%.
r:
•
Projected Labor Force--2003
3500060
30D0000 +Census
{'1-Serles A
2500000 -LrSerlas B
-x-Series C
2000000 +Serfes o
1500000
looooo0
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Slab Damopraplwr pm~acUOna
Some Sources of Demographic
Information
• State Demographer
http://www.demography.state. mn.us/
• Census Bureau http://www.census.aov/
• Legislative District profiles
http://www.demography.state. mn.us/LegProf/
i
4
• 1 _ 1 , V L~~S2.
~i 1~-
CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTHLY BUILDING DEPARTMENT REPORT
December 2003
PERMITS 8. USES
'
I'1~12~117:S ISti1 1~.U
/l ES'/U E.\'77:1 L I his
::\lontlt Ssunc Month
Lust 1'csu' Lust 1'car
'fo Uatc This fear
"fo Dute
Nu
b
m
er
\'ulu
ti -(0 2I >49
108
a
un
Pee. $3.889.7-! 1.00 $1.496.016.0 0 $26.36-1.209.00 $37.277.62.;.00
tiurchar $71.685.65 $22.021.22 $-t2d.l(19.1(1 ~•,oU-1.~5
$4- )
ges $1,803.45 $751.92 $13.623.44 $13.283.71
CO
1l
IIE
C
,
,
R
I.•I /.
N
il
~
un
'`1
\'al
i ~ ~( G~ 59
uat
"It
Ic $ 115.000.00 $37.360.00 $13.784.8G3.U0 $12,267.6 10.00
es
Surchar $2.2<IG.SI
$1,08) 78
' .
$118.319.53
$1(14,968.17
~" $57.50
$18.68
$5.571.95
$4.189.38
~
N
b
um
er
V
l
i 0
O
O
I
a
ual
t,n
Ftcs $0.00 $(-.UU $O.UU $500.00
~UI'Chaf $0.00 $U.00
$O. QO
$2 3.00
Le$ $0.00 $0.01) $0.00
$Q.JU
PL C'
l /lll
\'G
,
r
N
l
.
unt
'cl
Pees 32 12 219
274
Surrha
~ $-1.-119.00 $1.305.00 $2 3.550.00 $36.358.00
r~
rs $ 16.00 $G.UO $129.50
$188.50
N
b
um
er
I:. 40 19 )t
)8
302
"•
S
h $3.711.50 $ I,U I0.UU $19.030.00 $22,442.00
urt:
:tn_cs $20.00 <,-
$) ~0
$148.50
$153.5(1
v r
ucRs
N
untbrr
V
l
i U 0 I I 12
a
u:u
"It
I~ $UA0 $0.00 $38.700.(10 $5.3.500.00
"'
S
h $0.00 $O.UO $9G3.1> $950.25
urc
aree' $p.UO $0.(10 $39.43 $20.50
'IY)"I'.U. b 1'1:12\II"I'S
T(Yf
'
'
'
~ 114 SG 1182 I IS6
:\I. \
;U_l
:\
I
IO\
'f0'1':\1
I~la'S $ •J,llll-1,7x1.00 $ 1,533,-116.(111 $ x11,187,772.(111 S 39,599,263.110
.
I'O'1':\1. Sl~lt('ll:1RC1iS S 82,142.66
$ 1,89695 $ 25,4311.011
$ 790.10 $ 585,971.78
$ 1'),112.82 S :188,745.87
S 17,83GA9
I'I
:R~11'1' \
'
'
' h l:h,S (\l'~ 113EK TO D.~"I'G
•
;\
1
l
RG
Single family Number Permit/I'lun Clc Surchsu•-;t: \':tluation 'I'bis 1'eur Lust fear
Du
,l
"I'
i
I-l S $2Q370.48 $541.58 $I.?Gd.139.U(1 151 184
l
ex
tt
n
untes
"I'
i
l U $(1.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 19
r
l,
ex 3 $15.693.96 $110.73 $281.415,00 3 0
(~uaJ d-Flex
~i
l
' 20 $34A31.96 $1.1176.76 $2.155,048.00 -l8 2U
u
ti-I
amil~
C U $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 U 0
ommercial
I
l
'i I $1.35094 $ 37SU $75.UUOAO 2> 32
n~
usu
^1
R
Ci
~ U $U.OU $0.00 $U.O(1 U U
es.
ar:I~
es
P
bli
IIIJ U $U.UU
$0•!10
$0.00
18
32
u
c
~ss.
1 LTER 0 $11A0 $UA0 $0.00 0 0
:
.1 Tlv;\%RER4 /R
D
lli
ttc
ngs
C
i
l 9 $1.189.21 $44.;8 $88,739.00 206 187
onunerc
:l
In
lusu'i
l I $391.57 $20.00 $4(1.000.(1!1 3.1
33
t
a U $UAU $0.00 $0.00 I 0
\II T
.
he`
,llECl/
l r\'lG
I L 32 $4.459.00 $16.00 NA 27-1 259
r
-
\II T
.
~ I,es .
•I CCESSOR 1' 40 $3.751.50 $20.00 Nil 3(12 298
:
STRUCTURES
S
i
--
nuning Pools
D
~ U $UAU $U.0(I $U.0O 2 3
`c
,
1/OI'I
\'C 0 $0.00 $UA0 $U.UO 76 IU4
,
,
PERdI/T
B1L U $U.UU $0.00 $0.00 I U
LI30; I RD PEXr1//T
11
DE
' U $0.UU $0.00 $U.UU U ll
,
0LITly'\ U $O.UO $0.00 $0.00 II II
l~0'I':\LS 114 582,142.66 $1,896.95 $-I,OOa,7Jl.0U l1SG 1182
~.
• AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday -February 3, 2004
6:00 P.M.
DRAFT
Members: Dick Frie, Richard Carlson, Rod Dragsten, Lloyd Hilgart, and David
Rietveld
Council Liaison: Glen Posusta
Staff: Jeff O'Neill, Fred Patch, Steve Grittman - NAC, and Angela
Schumann
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of the minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting held January 6th,
2004.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
4. Citizen comments.
5. Consideration of a request for development stage planned unit development for common
signage and a conditional use permit for open or outdoor rental as an accessory use in the
B-3/Highway Business District.
Applicant: Glen Posusta
6. Consideration of a request for development stage PUD for a town home development and
preliminary plat of Hunters Crossing residential subdivision.
Applicant: Bison Development/Sylvia Development
7. Consideration of a request for a conditional use permit for the expansion of a religious
institution in the P-S/Public-Semi-Public District.
Applicant: Resurrection Lutheran Church
8. Discussion of ordinance amendment regarding fan lots.
9. Adjourn