Loading...
IDC Agenda 05-06-2003AGENDA MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 6, 2003 - 7:00 a.m. Academy Room - 505 Walnut Street MEMBERS: Chair Mary Barger, Vice Chair Tom Lindquist, Bill Tapper, Dick Van Allen, Tom Ollig, Don Roberts, Mike Benedetto, Barb Schwientek, Dan Olson, Kelli Huxford, Tom Feaski, and Lynne Dahl. COUNCIL LIAISON: Mayor Bruce Thielen. STAFF: Rick Wolfstellei-, Jeff O'Neill, John Simola, Fred Patch, and Ollie Koropchak. IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To maintain and increase the industrial tax base and to create jobs in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 7:00 a.m. 1. Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meeting.) 7:02 2. Vote to approve the April 1, 2003 IDC minutes. . 7:05 3. Updates by Mayor Thielen A. Progress on annexation and development of new agreement. B. Status of the Council recommendation to establish a task force for implementation of the Comp Plan. C. Report on the joint meeting of local elected officials held April 26, 2003. D. Other. 7:20 4. Reports: A. Kaltec BRE Visit -Barger/Koropchak B. Economic Development Report -Koropchak. 7:25 5. Discussion on and to continue development of a list of potential tasks to accomplish the goal of the 1DC: To provide a continuous stream of available industrial land with infrastructure potential. A. Review the draft copy of the May 6, 2003 Planning Commission Agenda for industrial related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if necessary. ~~~ ,~~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ; vim- F"i°' 1. Otter Creek Crossing '~' ~'` yv.d.rs'Cr~~e.~_ 2. Gold Nugget Development B. Review IDC goals/projects as prepared by Chair Barger supporting the City Council's Community Vision & Governing Policies. Vote if applicable. 8:00 6. Other Business. Chamber Updates - Feaski. Die-cask Storage Legislation -Huxford. 8:10 7. Adjournment. MINUTES MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, April 1, 2003 - 7:00 a.m. Academy Room - 505 Walnut Street MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Mary Barger, Vice Chair Tom Lindquist, Dick Van Allen, Don Roberts, Mike Benedetto, Dan Olson, Tom Feaski, and Lynne Dahl. MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Tapper, Tom Ollig, Barb Schwientek, and Kelli Huxford. COUNCIL LIAISON ABSENT: Mayor Bruce Thielen. STAFF PRESENT: Ollie Koropchak. IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To maintain and increase the industrial tax base and to create jobs in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meeting.) Chair Barger called the IDC meeting to order at 7:05 a.m. 2. Vote to approve the March 4, 2003 IDC minutes. Don Roberts made a motion to approve the March -l, 2003, IDC minutes. Seconded by Mike Benedetto and with no corrections or additions, the minutes were approved as written. Reports: A. Kaltec Tour - BRE scheduled for Thursday April 3 9.00 a m Koropchak reported that two members of the IDC and four members of the Chamber Board welcomed Kaltec, Inc. to the City of Monticello on March 14. The IDC provided cake and the group toured the facility at 307 Chelsea Road. Lindquist reported the company appears to be quite diversified from high-tech engineering to manufacturing of a forklift attachment. Besides Jason and Bruce Kallevig, there are three employees. With a number of questions being asked by the company officials, a BRE Visit has been scheduled for April 3, 9:00 a.m. Koropchak asked for volunteers, Barger and Olson volunteered. Olson to first check his calendar. B. Economic Development Report -Koropchak. Report accepted as written. 4. Discussion on and to continue development of a list of potential tasks to accomplish the foal of the IDC: To provide a continuous stream of available industrial land with infrastructure potential. A. Review the draft copy of the April 1, 2003 Planning Commission Agenda for industrial related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if necessary. IDC Minutes - 4/1/03 With no related industrial items on the Planning Commission agenda of April 1, 2003, no vote or recommendation was necessary. B. Update and status of the Gold Nugget concept stake PUD following Planning Commission action of March 4 and Council. Revised plan 3/12/03. Koropchak informed members of the conversation between Barger and herself and their plans not to attend the Planning Commission meeting of March 4, based on the IDC recommendation supported by O'Neill. Koropchak did prepare a summary of the recommendations for the commissioners. Due to a last minute illness by O'Neill, Koropchak did attend the meeting. Koropchak noted that the commissioners asked for written reasons supporting the IDC recommendations which for future recommendations will be provided. Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation, the concept stage PUD was revised for the Council meeting of March 12. The overall number of units were reduced from 370 to 304. Single family increased from 170 to 204, quad homes reduced from 68 to 52, and row homes reduced from 132 to 48. The commercial increased from 10 acres to 12.8 and the industrial was reduced from 60 acres to 37.7. Gold Nugget was requested to revise the plan. C. Clarify the intent of the list of recommended actions as prepared by Van Allen to assist in accomplishing the IDC Mission Statement. Does the 2003 IDC Mission Statement need amending`? Chair Barger informed the IDC that she was uncertain to the purpose of the actions prepared by Van Allen and presented at the March meeting. Van Allen said it was intended as a means to measure what's going on: Such as task force, Osowski/Remmele parcels. And was meant as a good tool for future members of the IDC and was not intended to be a part of the IDC Mission Statement. D. Discuss industrial development ideas as suggestions for ~ls/projects within the Community Vision & Governing Policies. Vote if applicable. Koropchak shared the goals prepared by the HRA. The IDC members noted a few items for consideration: 1. Stick to land use plan. 2. Define task force (role and who). 3. Liaison to MDOT Bridge crossing, etc. Benedetto suggested asemi-annual submission of the IDC Mission Statement to keep the Council and IDC members focused. Barger will prepare a list of IDC Goals with input from Lindquist, Benedetto, and Van Allen for review at the May IDC meeting. 6. Updates by Mavor Thielen A. Progress on annexation and development of new agreement. With Thielen and O'Neill absent, no update was given. B. Status of the Council recommendation to establish a task force for implementation of the Comp Plan. With Thielen and O'Neill absent, no update was given. • 7. Other Business. A. Chamber Updates -Feaski. Feaski noted the Golf Outing on May 15 and the need for hole sponsors and golfers, the Chamber had 31,000 hits on their web-site last month for housing, businesses, 2 IDC Minutes - 4/1/03 motels/restaurants, and swan info. They've assisted in lobbying efforts for the TIF extension and Xcel Energy bills, Monti Showcase scheduled for September 28, IDC Banquet speaker selected, and attended the Governor's visit at Xcel Energy and offered to host the Governor's radio show from Monti. 8. Adjournment. Mike Benedetto made a motion to adjourn the IDC meeting. Seconded by Dan Olson and with no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:10 a.m. Recorder • • ~ A.. • BRE VISIT SCHEDULE AND WRITTEN SUMMARY FORM IDC MEMBER INDUSTRY Name Barger and Koropchak Name Kaltec of Minnesota, Inc. Phone FAX E-Mail Mailing Address Primary Contact Bruce and Jason Kallevi~ Phone 763-295-2360 E-Mail Location 307 Chelsea Road FAX Monticello, MN 55362 Date of Visit -April 3, 2003 Time of Visit 9:00 a.m. Summary of Visit: Barger informed Kaltec of the purpose of the BRE visit. Kaltec asked what are other options for communication services? Stating their data line costs are three times as much in Monticello as in Plymouth with a drop in service. Outages, not dependable. Service provider is TDS Telecom, is there no competition? 2. What types of permits are necessary for a business? A permit may be necessary if an existing facility will operate under a new use, signage, or outdoor storage or display. Contact for Building Department, 295-2711. It is suggested to contact the Wright County Sheriff s Department to leave phone numbers for emergency situations. All new businesses must register with the Minnesota Secretary of State's Office. 3. Asked about financing programs? Koropchak explained programs and the need to work through their lender. Kallevig noted they had just changed lenders. Informed of Wright County Partnership programs. 4. The company was to e-mail Koropchak a description of their business for the Monticello Manufacturer's Directory. 5. They asked about ways to network with businesses or promote their business within Monticello. The Chamber of Commerce was mentioned and to check with Van Allen relative to the Wright Technical Industrial Networking Group. Mary Barger was a great mentor. 6. Web site: www.kaltec.com • ~'oG ~ .IH~ Agenda - 5/,/03 ~~ .8' Consideration of Executive Director's Report. a) Legislative Bill -According to John Choi, HRA Lobbyist, the Monticello Special Legislation Bill to extend the 5-year rule for TIF District No. 1-22 is still alive in the Senate Tax Bill, Local Development Session, and will now move on to the Conference Committee. Rep. Bruce Anderson walked away from the bill, either endorsed it nor objected to it. The questions now remaining are: If the Bill will survive the Conference Committee being endorsed by only the Senate and if the Tax Bill will be approved this session? b) Proposed TIF Legislation - 1. Upon subdivision or plat, developer must commit to use of TIF and can not come back to request TIF until two years after approval of subdivision or plat. 2. A waiting period of 180 days (6 mos) to allow opposition to creation of a TIF District. 3. Some adjustments to findings of substandard. Effective date after June 30, 2003. c) Production Stamping, Inc. -Production Stamping now occupies the Fallon Avenue Building (previous Midwest Graphics). They have a local phone number and the entire operation both office and production are here. Upon getting settled, the IDC will host a Open House/Welcome for the company. They bring 35 new jobs to the City of Monticello. Owner: Les Wurm. `~ ' ~' ' ~'~# i.0. .rr ~ `~ ~~''~~,,.,.~ d) Chamber Golf Outing -Through about 75 gratis invitations mailed to developers and industrial contractors, the Marketing Committee has 28 golfers. Thursday, May 15. e) Housing Districts -Median family income restrictions decreased in 2003 from 2002: For 1 to 2 family members - $76,700 to $75,300 and for families of more than 3 - $88,205 to $86,595. f) 2003 HRA Officers: Chair Steve Andrews and Vice Chair Bill Fair. g) Including the 2003 commitments by Council and the HRA the total amount committed for the use of industrial development is $765,000. Council $365,000 and HRA $400,000. h) Balance of Aroplax $21,324 and SMM $26,416 TIF Fund for previous LGA Penalty - available for industrial public improvements. i) 2003 EDA Officers: Chair Bill Demeules and Vice Chair Barb Schwientek. j) The EDA reports a cash balance of $696,970 after disbursement of the Tapper and UMC loans, April 22, 2003. 2002 year-end balance sheet shows assets of $1,357,573. The EDA voted to replace the Liquor Fund with another $70,000 for 2003 effective for tax levy 2004. In 2001, the EDA replaced the Liquor Fund in an amount of $77,000. Initially the EDA received a total of $383,000 from the Liquor Fund to start the local revolving loan program. k) Two leads: 70,000 sq ft sales and manufacturer of boats. 12 acres. 40-50 jobs. Expanding from Maple Lake. Wants freeway visibility. Foam fabricator -Foam packaging materials. 1) Assessment of TIF Contracts for compliance of completion. HRA only. • 1 ~~v ~w1 \+~~~.~ J HRA Agenda - 5/7/03 m) Remmele Building -Talked with Chuck Jungman at the headquarters relative to vacating building. Sti114-5 pieces of equipment in facility. Plan to place sign on building after all employees gone, expected mid June; Listed by C. B. Ellis Richardson, Tom Lelich. Have call in for lead sheet. ~~~o~~ ~~`~ ' ~ 5~~~~5 ~' ~~ t~ d ~ ~-~"~'~ 2 r INDUSTRIAL -IMPROVED Exclusive ce a w~r,~~d Enos REMMELE ENGINEERING 213 Chelsea Road For Sale ADDRESS N/A RENT/MONTH $2,100,000.00 PRICE 49,000 Sq.Ft. AREA UNDER ROOF Monticello CITY _ Wright COUNTY Negotiable DOWN PAYMENT N/A RENT / SQ. FT. / MO. SUBMITTED BY: Tom Lelich 11,887 No No Yes ±150 7760 France Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55435 OFFICE AREA DIVIDE RAIL SPRINKLERS PARKING 1 DOCK 2 GRND.480/277 V 1600 A 3 P 16' OFFICE: Minneapolis/St. Paul LOADING DOORS ELECTRICAL POWER TRUSS HGHT. PHONE: 952-924-4675 9.4 Acres/Irregular I-1 LOT SIZE AND DIMENSIONS MAP PAGE ZONING 04/01/2003 033642 ---------- _- - - Tom Lelich/Dan Terry Blooming ton DATE LISTING NUMBER __ LISTING SALESPERSON(S) OFFICE LAND AND STRUCTURES STRUCTURE: Well-maintained office/production facility built in 1990 with addition in 1996. CONSTRUCTION: Prestress concrete with steel columns, deck and joints with pitch and gravel roof. • OFFICE: Approximately 12,000 sf of air-conditioned space with conference/training rooms, privates, bullpen area, spacious lunchroom, one set of restrooms. MANUFACTURING: Approximately 37,000 sf of "high tech" production area. Fully air-conditioned (t 1 variance), 8" floor, roof top heating units, column bays are 33' x 25' and 33' x 50', extensive metal halide lighting system, restrooms/wash area, floor drains, Metrolift 3-ton bridge crane, buss duct power distribution, compressed air lines, coolant/water lines with drain system. SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES PARKING: Asphalt lot, lighted, space for approximately 150 vehicles UTILITIES: City Water/Sewer Gas - Reliant/Minnegasco Electric - Xcel Energy SECURITY SYSTEM: Silent Knight TERMS AND TAX DATA PRICE: $2,100,000 or $42.85/sf PROPERTY TAXES (2003): $69,921.63 ($1.43/sf) SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: None levied or pending at this time PID#: R155-066-001010 COMMENTS . -Excellent exposure and access to I-94 via Highway 25 exit. - Submit all offers, property will be vacated by 8-01-03. Ca RICHARD ELLIS, INC. • LICENSED REAL ESTATE BROKER fie information above has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While we do not doubt its accuracy, we have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is your responsibility to independently confirm its accuracy and completeness. Any projections, opinions, assumptbns or estimates used are for example only and do not represent the current or future performance of the property. The value of this transaction to you depends on tax and other factors which should be evaluated by your tax, financial and legal advisors. You and your advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of the property to determine to your satisfaction the suitability d the property for your needs. orm u~ ~m oe,. a~oo -~.~~ AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday -May 6, 2003 D ,„ 6:00 P.M. ~"'~ Members: Dick Frie, Richard Carlson Rod Dra sten g ,Lloyd Hilgart, and David Rietveld Council Liaison: Brian Stumpf Staff: Jeff O'Neill, Fred Patch, and Steve Grittman 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of the minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting held April 1, 2003. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 4. Citizens comments. 5. Public Hearing -Consideration of a request for an interim use permit allowin a publi ~,.,•~ school use in the I-1 District. Applicant: Monticello Public Schools ~~~~,,~ Gr~,''Z "$o.~A ~" _ " ~y ~c,~'" `~~` " 6. Public Hearing -Consideration of a request for a variance to the rear yard setbacks to allow construction of a 20' x 26' building addition. Applicant: Michael Renstrom 7. Public Hearing -Consideration of a request for development stage planned unit development allowing 8 single family units in a proposed ~ district. ~~p~licant: Totem Holt~~~ g 8. Public Hearing -Consideration of a request for concept stage planned unit development and preliminary plat approval, and consideration of a request to,rezone from AO to R-lA and - 2A. Applicant: Shadow Creek Corporation '~ `r~^"'`~ ~ ~'~"" ' ~_ 9. Public Nearing -Consideration of preliminary plat approval of the Otter Creek Crossing commercial subdivision. Applicant: Otter Creek LLC 10. Public Hearing -Consideration of a request for a concept stage planned unit development in the R-2 District. Applicant: Richard Carlson 11. Public Hearing -Consideration of a request for development stage planned unit development and preliminary plat approval, along with a request for re-zoning from Agriculture-Open Space to a combination of R-1, single family residential, R-2, single and two family residential, I-1 A, light industrial, and B-2, limited business district. Applicant: Gold Nugget Development Inc. 12. Public Hearing -Consideration of a request for amendment to a commercial planned unit development allowing an expansion to an auto sales area. Applicant: Monticello Ford/Dave Peterson • 13. Adjourn Planning Commission Agenda - 05/06/03 11. Public Hearin: Consideration of a request for development stake planned unit development and preliminary plat approval, along with a request for re-zoning from Agriculture-Open Space to a combination of R-1, single family residential, R-2, single and two family residential, I-lA, light industrial, and B-2, limited business district. Applicant: Gold Nu~~et Development Inc. (NAC) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Gold Nugget Development Inc. is requesting preliminary plat approval of a 220 acre multi-use (residential, commercial, industrial) development to be known as the Featherstone subdivision. The site is located directly south of the Kjellberg East trailer park, abutting Highway 2~ to the West, 85`x' Street to the south, and County R9ad 117 to the east. The project, which went through concept approval in March of 200, consists of 150 acres of residential (single family and townhouse units), 10 acres of commercial, and 60 acres of light industrial use. A 60 acre portion of the site (Phase I) has been annexed into the City and is currently zoned A-O, Agricultural- Open Space, of which a request for a rezone to residential uses is being pursued. The application includes development stage PUD approval of the R-2, townhouse portion of the site and a PUD overlay for the R-1 portion of the site allowing flexibility in lot width requirements. Concerns including site design, buffering between uses, and limiting the use of cul- de-sacs were discussed during concept approval. The applicant has revised the plans to deal with such issues. The following report is Planning Staff's analysis, review, and recommendations regarding the revised plans dated April 14, 2003. Land Use. The land uses proposed for the Featherstone development are reflective of the City's Comprehensive land use plan and have been the subject of numerous discussions between City Staff, the township, and the developer. The project proposes that the subject site be rezoned from its current A-O designation to a mixture of land uses including 60 acres of I-lA (light industrial), 10 acres of B-2 (limited business), approximately 20 acres of R-2 (townhome development), and 130 acres of R-1 (single family detached) development. During the Concept Plan review, the IDC recommended that the land dedicated for industrial use be increased to 65 acres, thereby reducing the commercial land to 5 acres. After some discussion however, it was recommended by the Planning Commission that the land use should remain as is. Preliminary Plat. During concept review, staff recommended a higher amount of detached housing versus the number of attached units. The revised plans have addressed this issue by eliminating a large number of attached townhouse units planned for the north end of the site, replacing them with detached single family lots. Other design issues that have been revised include the removal of "Butt Lots" and elimination of the need for temporary dead end connections. Both the single family lot layout and the townhome lot design generally meet the performance standards for their perspective districts. The following table illustrates Planning Commission Agenda - 05/06/03 these performance requirements, followed by a list of issues and concerns that remain: R-1 Requirements Lot Area 12.000 sf Lot Width 80 feet Front Setback 30 feet Side Setback - House Side l > feet Side Setback - Garage Side 6 feet Rear Setback 30 feet /usable Roof Pitch x/12 Garage Size 4~0 sf House Size 2.000 sf Finished Size 1,00 sf Foundation Size None Garage Location Standard setbacks Landscaping Sod & two trees per lot in new subdivisions or four trees for corner or double fronting lots R-2 Requirements Lot Area 12.000 sf Lot Area per unit / Townhome 5,000 sf Lot Width 80 feet Front Setback 30 feet Side Setback - House Side 10 feet Side Setback - Garage Side 10 feet Rear Setback 30 feet /usable Roof Pitch 3/12 • • The plat provides the frontage of the lot on the street, but does not detail the width of the lot at the 30 foot setback line. Some of single family lots are close to the 80 foot minimum lot width requirement. The R-] District permits averaging, but staff would need to have the lot widths identified to ensure that the minimums and the averaging requirements are met. • Building elevations and floor plans for the townhome units need to be submitted and reviewed. 2 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/06/03 Planned Unit De~~elop»~enl. The application requires Development Stage PUP approval for the 20 acre R-2 (townhome) portion of the project At concept level, the Planning Commission and Planning Staff agreed that this mixture of residential uses was adequate, subject to decreasing the overall ratio of attached townhome units compared to detached single family units. Development Stage PUD provides the level of detail that is necessary to verify that the intent of the PUD ordinance is met. Design, landscaping, building, and open space comments below address the PUD request for the townhouse portion of the project. Circulation /Access. The residential portion of the site shows two access points off of County Road 117 to the east, two access points to the south off of 8~`~' Street and an access to the west connecting the residential portion with the fiiture industrial and commercial uses. The applicant will need permission from the county for the access points onto County Road 117 and MnDOT approval will be needed for the access off of Highway 2~. Some right-of--way may be needed for the realignment of the intersection at 85`x' Street and Highway 25. Additional right of way may also be needed within the commercial and Industrial area to accommodate medians and turn lanes. It should also be noted that funds will be requested for the reconstruction of both Edmonson and 8~`~' Street. Staff is generally comfortable with the meandering street pattern throughout the project. The plan consists of a collector street with an 80 foot right-of--way connecting 85`x' Street to Edmonson Avenue. The future Cedar Street Street extension within the Commercial/Industrial portion of the site is currently shown with a 60 foot right-of--way and should be changed to an 80 foot right-of--way with a 40 (perhaps 44) foot street. The remainder of the minor streets provide fora 60 foot right-of--way width. As requested during the concept stage, the site has eliminated two of the previously proposed cul-de-sacs and lessened the length of the remaining three cul-de-sacs to well under the maximum allowed 600 feet. The plans show landscaped center islands in each of the three cul-de-sacs. The islands meet the design width requirements of 80 feet total radius with a 40 foot radius provided for the landscaped median. The islands are to be platted as outlots. The two landscaped medians located in the R-2 district are to be owned and maintained by the association. The landscaped median in the R-1 district cul-de-sac is to be owned by each of the lots fronting on the cul-de-sac in equal undivided interests. A maintenance plan for this outlot will need to be submitted and approved by the City prior to final plat approval. Staff suggests that the maintenance plan be accomplished through a restrictive covenant agreement where the six lots fronting the cul-de-sac are held jointly responsible for the maintenance of the island which include any costs incurred on the City if forced to maintain it. It has been a general development practice of the City to minimize the need to use spur driveways. Spur driveways make it difficult for City maintenance, garbage, and fire protection vehicles to maneuver. As such. plannin~7 staff encourages the developer to consider a looped road development within the row-townhouse area as opposed to the proposed cul-de-sac and six spurred driveways. The loop would 3 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/06/03 likely be in the shape of a "horseshoe", with the area ad}acent to the street providing some open space. The site plan provides for two future connections to the 20 acre piece of land southeast of the site for future development. The applicant has provided City Staff with an adequate sketch plan of how the site could be developed in a reasonable manner in the future. Park / Ti•ail. The plans show an approximately 17 acre linear park and trail connection running north and south through the center of the site. The subdivision ordinance requires that 10% of the final plats gross area be dedicated for park use. In this case, the dedicated amount exceeds the 15 acres required. In accordance with the suggestions made at concept level, the applicant has revised the plans to include the following; an east/west trail connection along 85`x' street to State Highway 25 and a trail running along the southern portion of the most northern pond rather than the northern portion abutting the trailer park as shown on the concept plan. Upon further review, the Planning Staff suggests the following revisions; character of the linear park should be enhanced by including mounding and increased landscaping, Public Works staff suggests intermittent split rail fence sections be used as delineators from the park to the rear yards as opposed to vinyl bollards. P g g( g shrubs), to improve appearance and lessen noise pollution from the light industrial It vvas suggested in concept review that the parks commission has been looking for an area to develop a larger, active park with ballfields and that the proposed parkland along 8~`h street may be suitable for this purpose. The parks commission has since decided that this may not be the best location for such a park as it would require lighting for ballfields which may conflict with neighboring residential use. The Parks Commission will continue to review the possibilities for the larger southern park and will likely require a small parking lot off of 85`'' street. Building style. The applicant has submitted elevation and floor plans for both the four unit townhomes and the quad homes. The 42 slab on grade quad units consist of 4 units each with 4 different styles that can be combined, depending on the desire of the buyer. The 48 townhome units, located around the northern most cul-de-sac are 2 story with 2 car tuck under garages and 1600 sq. ft. of finished building space. The townhouse plans need to be revised to provide a 74 foot building separation. The buildings appear to meet the building standards as far as roof pitch and building material. Planning staff suggests that the blank side of the townhouse buildings include windows or some type of facade treatment to enhance appearance. Landscaping. The applicant has submitted a landscaping plan which generally meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The R-1 district provides for two boulevard trees per lot (four on a corner lot) at 2" diameter. The boundary of the site appears to be sufficiently buffered from both the trailer park to the north as well as along 85`h and Edmonson Streets. Discussions were raised during concept review as to how to most efficiently buffer the residential portion of the site from the industrial/commercial portion of the site to the west. The applicant is proposing a dense mixture of lantin s includin River Birch Scotch Pine and Mu ho Pine 4 Planning Coimnission Agenda - 05/06/03 uses. Staff is comfortable with the landscaping plan however, it should be noted that as the industrial lots develop, they will be required to add their portion of the required ~0 foot landscaped buffer between the industrial and residential uses, which include 160 planting units per 100 feet of abutting property line. It should also be noted that a grading plan and landscaping plan will need to be developed that results in a "wet" pond, with plant materials that can tolerate periodic inundation. Signage. The site plans show two monument signs, one located at the western access off of 85`x' street and the other at the northern most access off of Edmonson Avenue. Plans for these signs are to be submitted and reviewed by City Staff and should meet the requirements of Section 3-9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Gradin,~ Plan. The submitted grading plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Utility Plan. Plans for sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer for the subject site have been submitted. Ponds need to have street exposure for aesthetic and access/maintenance reasons. All utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Decision l : Development Stage PUD Motion to approve the development stage PUD allowing 20 acres of the low density residential site to be utilized for townhome development based on a finding that the overall density and land use pattern is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Motion to recommend denial of the development stage PUD allowing 20 acres of the low density residential site to be utilized for townhome development based on a finding that the overall density and land use pattern is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Motion to table the request for further study. Decision 2: Rezoning from AO to R-1, R-2, I-1, and B-2 Motion to recommend approval of the Rezoning from AO to R-1 for the single family portion of the site, R-2 for the townhouse portion of the site, I-1 for the industrial portion of the site, and B-2 for the commercial portion of the site based on a finding that the proposed zoning would reflect the intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan. • 5 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/06/03 2. Motion to recommend denial of the Rezoning based on a finding that the proposed zoning does not consistent with the intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Motion to table the request for further study. Decision 3: Preliminary Plat for Featherstone Motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Featherstone, and mixed use development, based on a finding that the land use pattern is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions; The developer verifies that all R-1 single family lots meet the minimum 80 foot lot width requirement, or that the averaging allowances of the district are met. 2. Permission must be obtained from Wright County for the access points onto County Road 117. 3. Access approval must be granted by MnDOT for access off of Highway 25. 4. Funds will be required for the reconstruction of both Edmonson and 85`x' Street. 5. Additional right-of--way may be needed for the realigmnent of the intersection of 85`h street and highway 25. 6. Additional right-of--way may be needed near the intersections in the ~ Commercial/Industrial portion of the site to accommodate medians and turn lanes. 7. The future Cedar Street extension in the Industrial/Commercial portion of the site needs to be revised to include an 80 foot right-of- way and 40 foot street. 8. Maintenance of the two landscaped center islands located in the townhouse section of the site is to be provided via the association 9. A maintenance plan for the landscaped center island located in the R- 1 portion of the site is to be submitted and approved by the City. 10. Townhouse building to building separation needs to be 74 feet. 11. Need to add character to linear park areas, including mounding and increased landscaping. 6 • • • Planning Commission Agenda - 05/06/03 • 12. Intermittent split rail fence sections are to replace the white vinyl bollards to be used to delineate the park from the rear yards. 13. The three landscaped center islands are to be platted as outlots. 14. The landscaped median in the R-1 disriict cul-de-sac is to be owned by each of the lots fronting on the cul-de-sac in equal undivided interests. 15. Ponds need to have street exposure for aesthetic and~y~ access/maintenance reasons. 16. A portion of pond bottom to be lined so that it holds water. The balance planted with plant materials that can tolerate periodic inundation. 17. The southern park will need to be reviewed by the Parks Commission as to whether to require a small parking lot off of 85'x' Street. r~ 18. The applicant is to look into adding windows or some other form of building treatment to the side elevations of the four unit townhouse buildings to add to the character and visual appearance of the buildings. 19. As developed, the industrial lots are to provide their portion of landscaping in the required 50 foot landscaped buffer between industrial and residential use. 20. Plans for the two proposed monument signs are to be submitted and reviewed by City Staff. Signs should not be located in a center island median. 21. The submitted grading plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 22. All utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 23. A revised set of preliminary plat drawings is prepared and submitted, demonstrating compliance with the adopted plat conditions. • 2. Motion to recommend denial of the Preliminary Plat for Featherstone, based on a finding that proposed plat is not consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance or the land use pattern of the Comprehensive plan. 3. Motion to table the request for further study. 7 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/06/03 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of each of the requests, with the recommended conditions. Although there are numerous specific recommendations, it is staff s opinion that the plat is laid out in a manner that the conditions will affect only slightly, if at all. The site has been the subject of considerable discussion between the City and the developer, including a concept plan review by the Planning Commission and City Cowlcil. The proposed plat, with the recommended conditions, closely reflects the intent of these discussions and should meet the City's zoning and subdivision regulations, as well as the Comprehensive Plan and Parks Master Plan. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Exhibit A -Site Location Exhibit B -Site Plan Exhibit C -Preliminary Plat Exhibit D -Preliminary & Site utility Plan Exhibit E -Landscape Plan Exhibit F -Townhouse building elevation plan Exhibit G -Townhouse building layout Exhibit H -Quadhome building elevation plan Exhibit I - Quadhome building layout • 8 I r~ n ~~ I I r• n ~~ ~ I~ I ~ ~ I c~ ~ I I ov ~ ~ --- -- --~ ~ L--------- ~ ~ ~ ~ ( I ~ 86TH STREET ~ ~ ~ r , II 1 I~,~ I I 1 V,~ 1~~ I C I 1 ~ .'` ~ n I ~, I I n I n I I l n ~I ~ ' ~ I'I ~-<~'~ I ~-\ ~~ I ~.< ~,' III ~-~ ~~ I -J ~ I-JI i JJ I ~ I ~ lil J-~ --- -- _ _L_.L_-- I ( --~-- -- --~11L- -- --~ SECTION 22 SECTION 23 TOWNSHIP 121 N, RANGE 25 W NI { s '. ,. ~/ ~, ~ ~ i/ LOCATION MAP NO SCALE ----- \ - - - _ -- ~ \ j cn 4 ~ ~\\ .~ \ \ ~ ~ I ~~ i ~® (~ \ ~ I - ] o _ .III ~ %~. \ / r~ o III ~ ,• ~ I O ,' i \J , ~ ,~\ \ cal ~ - / '`-" - u - i I I a m \ ~\` \ /' ~ I ~ w M = o N ~ ~ ~ u7 ~ 00 N i t Z ~ N ~~ ~ / N U I ~ ~ ~ J CSI ~. C~ _ ~ , v = !F ° ~ }, x I ~ t< -~-< n ~ I Z ~ ~ , _s _ ~.~ I I' lal ~, ~. r '~ ` ~~ 1 ~- 1 ~'. _ .. ... ... ........ 1 ~ .._ -.. .I ~a 111 '. I .-_ ..-_., - .. III ` Q Q f-- LL. C ~: t 0 ~ rn t.w ~ , w = = N Z Ow U j~ Z W U wU w vui o ~^r z ~z '^ag ~a n . p J U ~ Q~~W s C =w~i r w~~J ` oZZ~ yy ~7I A 7 ~ a1~W T W W T t 9 ~ ~ Z a ~ e u ~U U o~or w ~z F- UZZ O JJ~U fa~w momma w aw ~~mo w~°a z V~jNaU ~ W aU = VIUI QJy JJ ~ WFa-H xWw w UINUO 1 ~~ t ;' • • ~ _~ Q W •. \ w z 0 a 4 _~, 1 _ ., cti ,% _ _ ~ r ~. E N N ~ '~ n `` -• ~•. ~ rr; -~.. ~~ _ _ `~` ~,. ~. ~.. v r~ m _ ((~~ N .. ~- ... V ~ ~n J N ~ ~ _ ~ Q ~ ~ N O Z J J ~ a_ z = °n \ 7.96 0 ~l - ... ~ v .. _ , ..... ..... ._ ~. n 1 I ~ - J ~ )I 1 ` n J.. . .. ... .. r7 (n '+Y x i ~ ' ~~ o tt (n ~~ .. - .__.~_.-^-- ... ~ .._ t ~ ~~ `_ Zz-~_ *c------ --_ . ~` ~, --- - "-- ___ _` ~_:.. ,_ U Q ~ .~ ~ ~ F+ 1 ~ s i; F, ~) t~ it j`, #~ ~~ ~~i ~ u u g~ ,- a *a w », .+ • • • f J ~; t ~ i ~~ I I I I~ I I (.I ip i i I~ I ~'n I I I lid j I I;'~ 111 ~ _ t III ~~ a,~ Ili I,I I .. ~ -_ t -41 ~ i ~ III I ~~ `~ M -- ' r I. ~~ I~ g m D m N O Z m ~~ g :s~i:jl f9ti+"R`Y ;I: ;ia 'E tic r9~oga ~~. t ~!i'iP Si FY'f 's` ; ` ~g ~~~ ""y a~ :4''9j~la:~ t7~~~~~:S80~ixi ~~3'9P.~ _ r F t j, t i ' + c; i+p ~?~;{ijf 1~ YPi ri7 ~)~ JP~l+ Lf sa ~+ C :4~ tf4 t~ `~ i~ ~~. y. i~ j• P + + y '7; ,~ •, --_ v _ _',` __ ~~ ~~ - - ., ~ ~ ~ , _ ~~ ~ ~\ O ~, \\'`./CV~ ~ \\'~/\+/' \{°~.`'C (qtr-, ~.~. " ~ I .o \ a ~~ ~ ;a ~I ((~ ,. ®~ ~~ 1~ ~ ~ ~\ ~~ ~ + ~ , ~ la C r I D r v n z -~ n 7 r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; t- mac. y ~ ~ I L ~ ~ N~ ~ \ - .;)~ ~~ ~ ~ I N ~ I I ` ~~o w I I r i _., .- ~. \` \~ ~ _ _ ~ ~~f F:i __.___._ ._... .. .ZI H r .,. . - N m ~ ~, I ~ _. - ---- ~, w rn Cv` I n s". cn ~~ ~ - -- - ~ ~ .. ~ .1. __~_ r .ti . 1 C. ~ I L L ~ ~ I ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ CO ~ w I ~' \~. _' I I 'h a~ ~. b ~ i~eLl'3 ~ n~ l ~`~' ~ o g D A ~ x H O ~ ~ ~ ~ > H J ~ 11 >, F, ~ $~~a m w:..~ ~ 6 v v~ Z~~~ gg~__~ m N~o~ a~~~ ~~~~ ~"m~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~_~ ~z~~ ~~gg~~ =8 ~_~ ~~ l9 ~ iFY~t m o ~ I~ l ~~~ ~ ~ g f o ~~ ,< m . !~ ° _~ Ir, ~ I _~ o~ ~ ~. C ~ ~ ~ ~ I a a~ ~ f ~~ $ ~a~ -, u wN... ~ J ~~ C z D -< ~, ZI 0 N C7 D "U m v r D Z l]1a~ \ ~ ~ : . _ . \~\!` y I' ~~~ y I ~~ <~ ~ i c. ~: / , J. ~ t~ ~ ~~ r I~ 1 `J9 / f1 N 0 .~ _ ... .~~. A y g €', m ~' ml yK S~ ~; 2~ k b + 0 E K O ~ i / \ ~ -... _ / ~~:( Ir ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~_ f - -~- - - -- ,r I I I j I I 'C' I~t I I I I I ~. i 1 1 I i _ I ~ ~ ~ I 1 J w U N !!. Ffi' ~ I! I ^. r r Q ~Y ~ a alt [~ }. (( (3i ~ !I ~E t dE x ~ ~ } d F p#' ~~,,•`ft' If~ !~i ~ - ~ di r. i id bt - ,~ Etd d`r, 2j~ ~ly1S ~t 1 b' ~~~-~` .'.'.. ~ ;..a ~; k~ ~ ~i J? is ~a Tll i?E a~ ~i::•d ai / j'L ly ~, N !i ~ s ` 4T! ,glMa t5 id l'! dil~ ! si ~~~~-' al , 2.1~-'I ° "~r';Ville ~~; g. 3ts'_sE ~ed. (! Ea.jSi .. -~i F i ° S n X il>y °a.~ ~:~° I ~I~ i X a F S ~ __ ___-_-_._ - -_ _.._ ` 3 3 333 33 3'3 3 3 ~ 33 ~ 33 ' 8 8 8 88 F ~ ~ ~~ ~~ z . - _. -~-t- ° i I ~ 1 1 ~ ~'I~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ bm CSf~ K W a .. ~ ~ .i. k , ~ ~,'. ~ ~ Y g ~ ~~ k C O Y ~ ~ J ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~I N~ > ~ ~ ~::1 :~.; _ g ~ ~' ~ ~ 6 i ~ Si ^{^{ ~ i ~ ~~ 666 I ~~ ~~ ~ j q ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ }a ~ s u Z •y 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ @ S w ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~ i i ~. ~ ~' ~ ~ E g `d d~~ ~ ~ -' ~ c ~ J !E id ! ` ET fi'd 4 i ` . . - .n, -I- A I +~- k;El~ - ~ : - d ~~~~ ~(- t` N . (S1I3NL0 AB 03N0530 3B Ot) 1N317f1N0lY __ -._ _ __ - . _ } J a .~ ..-.W -_ ___ . ^~ ~, O l_ o i . ~^ ^ z Q = - I ~,M - _ - ,I~,~ X~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ m rn ~ ~ t^ n~ ,^^ °1 I W ` ~p% Z sl O .. .. - I o: . - ~. TJ 1 '11 W 3 1 ~~ O r: ~.• C7 yy,~,,, •li ry ~~ ~ II d 1 ~ ,_ O. O n ~ Fri ! .,^ ^'"I ~ ~ (~ I II Zn ' ca 'y i _. / !, Y ~ ~ __ - ~ .. o In n q# r~ 1 I s i ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~^^ 111 r -a~ `~~~~ ~ O _~ N ~ / ~ ~ r ~ o - - - - -- _ -" ~•I ! `• 1 _ I ~Ld ~ : ~ ~ ~ n yz, r> I \~,• `~' 1 1-1 ~ ~ ^ J I:l ~ ^ c~ __ ~ n: , .. CS'C' .. .1 " ^ ~ ~ i N ~ -. 1 n \ I n '.... / ~ a , ~ w-- ~, o ::`, '-- ~ O S , ~ ~/ I ~ ,gyp P, ~~ .. ~'. _ ~~// I rl ~ ~` / a '.\~ If I Q O O ~f\ ~ i /~ I Q 1L w °~ ._ ~ •~ III \ a 4 3 'E ~7 ,aY '!j{~ N [}e o Ei' > ~~~ m !~. W 0 0 u ~¢ n rZ s .Q , *a • '+..' • ~ ~ ~ ~; *• •. _ * D ` _ Fic r ~ + 2' 3', k~ ~ , . II~~ ~ !~~ .~~~ ~I >: ,, ~-~ ~ i _~~ : , .., . Y:. ~ ~~ i aj1 I f~} I ~ ~~ i l -~ ` \ . ~: ~-;. '\ ; ~_ ~ j , \, I~' ; ~\ .. I , \w I ~ Y I ' .~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ \ \ I 1i ' I ~ ~ \ \ ; ~ \ \ I \ 1 I I I O ` C ` \ \ / ~ I I r y '\. ~ ~ k ,. a e \ k ~ i I `\ ~°~' \~ f ~ `` \~~ I ~ / I I I ~ ~ 571tEEt p \ A l '~~ \ / ~ ` ~ ~ ~ \ ~ Ch~Ar \ r~ I ' v ' ~~ ' A ~~ /~ hq ~s, ~ \ I ~ ~ ~N I ~1 •~ A \ A ' c ~ //~ `\ I I~ ~~ ~ 2 \ I Y ' // \' 1 ~ i I / \ ' `1 ~ \. i.\~~t~ ' I ~ g I I ! ~ I .-~. ~ . \ ~ 'r r~ i'~. S ~ I j; II f~ ^IA ~~.Y "l ~ 1 I I I~ 0 G c- \ I ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ r U i O 1 I ____ _____.. _~_-_-- i I III I Z I I .c I I ~ I ~ , __- '-'-~ ~ 1 A I ~ fj m I~. [i c"' R m D ~_ Rm F A ~N ~O Z m rn R ~~ k A~ g I s8, i n3 ~~pp`~ d~C ~~Bi ~~ I A a~ i e i 1~~f ~" ~ 6 ~~~Y N ~ y~f a p;;~ ci ~i n ~a~ ~ 4¢ Rq~ R a ~ s°;7 •~R r, a b a 9 Y ~~~r ~~ ~ I ~ X I ii ' pI ~•k.' n, ~ ~ I I I I I I `-0 i ~ ,'y .~~%r~^ __ _N _ '3'N 3f1N3AY NOSONOYY03 s~ f ...,. f -- .~ r ~ . ._ 1 i ' ~ i ~g ~ ' ' ----- -- --~ g ' cO •.i i.I-~ , u, ~:, -~__ ... _._. - ~ni" ii,s'eii6 La"f. .. _ rn ~ I I "~ Y. ~' L•~ j ~• r ~ Y -~~~) -j--Y9:~~ _ -- f"_-~- .. \ o, i j t~-S' Y 'JU1© '_x? I I W r !R i i i~ c r ~ 'n , ~ _~_ _.~ _. o.. . ^.._ -- -) i 1 1•i _ m ~ 1 m j. ~ "DOl6 ~X3 I I I I lJ. ti .111111 ' ~. I i~: - r~ ~ ~ I ,, n I •- I ~ . ,. 1, ' 1 I Yr a J I `^ ' I II PI _._._..... I i l. :. ,, a , J ~ I tl e • . ,j ~~ , r. rc u~ I In l ~ I ~ I U `, O I I :\\ rl I n r ~~ of j y 0><$ ~/It //~~ '~'1n n 'ry!~~ r I ~' U Ob ~~~ ~. rv ~ _'Tt I I ____.__ __.I r Q~~. ~ /'•\ 'rte ~'\ V _ri / nr ~- '- --- ~ I (>0 I i'2 I ~ N / ,, ~ ;,~` \,\ // ,•,,: -~ r C II III I - - -- I C I, ~-! •\ ,~ I / ~/ / \Y / \\\ ^'- / / / Y/~ I/ --' r ~n 3 l3 a15 i I Z . • I ~ ~ i p~'': 1 '~~., ,~ I ~I I '~' _ fio~w (v`y~ /,~ /~' ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I y ~f i i 'ri.~ I I r~ ~~ ; I d~~s \ L. 3 33at5^ ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ 1 i ~ I O ~- . ' I _.. ... _ < ~ r f I ~ 4J ' _ _ _.__. _. M ' I I 1 _ H, rpr s MrCI" _11_a' r. _ I 0 I ' '1 r7 I ~l I \ ~ ~ l r' N _ - .`~ y^~ I ~n t0 '3 1 , 1- ~Y ' 'r ii ~=' U ° r j/ I op ~~ e~ I I ~ m b r> h i !t! I ...~ I ~ c _. I ~ ~ °~' ._..... .___.. __- -......~J ~ " Ir ~ ~:..~+ ~'` •\ ~ ~ N 133x1 yrn ~~Ir . I ` I I r ~ ~ - ~ u ~ b ~ I I z ~ ~ -~_ n " Q - l _~ ~-> • ill _ -~ -~„_~- ;, ~ - ~ .~ I I I a ..........~„ I ' rU ~/~ - • b r ~ ~~ ~ / I •; ~ I ,~ _ .~ .___-L I ~ I r \ `, ~ f \., ~ .fit , '~,. ~ I .a... r~~~ I~ ~ ~ j ' Io.~, - --.. I _ ~b 1 I i ~ II '" ~ '1~ r~\~c_ -~ ~ , I` I ", ,n ~ n IA I I W~ .~` (I (I 1O r ,, ~W ~- I I 1 ~ ~ _ I I I ~ 'I ~~~ I i -n Ix I I ~ \ rv ~\ ~ '- 7 V! I Ip _ ~,~ a .~R , rv \\ rv Q'ry r ~- .. ~ / ~ I I 3 IF°~+ . _~ -' ,` ' ;r ~ ~ tih . rJ ~ \ ; ~ \\\ 0.01 ~ rv 'o ) ~' ~J~ I ~ . k '~ \\'' b~. / T \.\ \\\\ ti 8 ~ ~ r rv N / ~ I I I 1 1 a % o fin. / ,\• ~ i r 5 \ ~ •~.m / _ ~ _ I~ /\ i eL uia~i !yt~ 'R, ~. i v, ~ .?rrfirny _~I ;qf l 1 I ,\ a o ~~ ,~ ~~ y x i < ~ I F i `\ ~ ~' b~r Y ~ ' ~.l' \ I ~ r r~ J` 1 t I .~ s' y j ~ l.r.... •I.~ \ , `b \ yts ,~ _.b~i .I° ^ /, ,1 `, b Il 1 ~ ' ' ! `\ ~ ~ - fir, .b ---~ ~. K / ,~~ ~ ~ I 1 , ` ~ ~ I 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ \ ~~` _ - I ~ I i e t33ats~ 1_.._~f I\ \"'~?~~ r , " f\,` r<' I~ ` I I ;ai I ~ _ •\ - I ~3a Ida ~9 i -;• - Y Y ~ ~ .: ~ t 4~ 3 - r- S~i ~ I I 1t ,, Ka ~ ~ , 1 "5 i KI1l '_, ~; r ~s ~ I RI } ~g J F I 1 Y ~ 1-~~~. %%/ ~ '~ ~ ~= ~ ~~ I I ~I [ h~ '~ t Y l1: ~ ; t I ~ !'.,L! € I ~ ~ ~ f _ ~ , \ I d~ ~ (+ j 1 I t=/r,,i . ~ ~ ,- . I ~. y ~ Ya 9 4P8 K V ~ . '. y " a .I I VJT ~;-. ~~>¢ r a -~1I(( ~U/ I I I ~ ~: i~YK `' a ':~-~-fT`~s 4~~_-'a _ ~ J~~n 3 3 ro :etj ~I Fi95 S~P~r ~~ g~ \A~96 .FI! pp!~ i5 8 ~ o~ iJ .~ II~ ~,~ C ~~''~ •~Q -; ~! a n w ?. •* t *# ~ ~ i 1~ ~ I'o3a T'LLIMI 31Ya 26QlIfIB 3WOH W015ln. •~ui xo~73-xvnols V ~ 1~ 1--y .~~.~. V 1 r , ~i F(F-~--~~F1-~~-1 ~F 1- -~ ~l~ ~j~ ti ~ E•+ ,~YQ ,~ I ii9NVNJ 2FJd ~ A~U`JCi ~SNvHJ U(i iJVl1 _ ~ Y Ol 1791'9(IS 36 TIIM M31h321 Mdld 2t3L~Y 34YW '31Y0 'i/3X18 I539NYW7 JNY M31/~~ NY-Id WOlk! (l.hfY dl) 031Y:710NI 5Y 6391iYFi7 HLIM 65TJIMYaIa 363{L ,3/.OiiddY 3M/I ~ w ~~W QOQa LL z~U _O uWLL Ip~? 4 `}J n10~ ~~a,> affa I/ >~~n> °weQ zwz~ vwUQ QoQQ `u ~i~wz ~ QawO T/LLIHI 31YU ~31A31 UIB 31"ICJFi W015(rJ, ~~~~-xenox ~ ' '31y0 rv W '' z z ? L ~ a ;~ a o ~ x T r , F+-1 ~ ~ r , F+i ~ v ~ f\i ~ / ~ Q ~ z_ ~ n O ~ _ n ai J1 H d i' ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~ N N J ~~ ~ O ~- ~ ~ O_ ~ ~~ QZ V O y Ol 1'Jgf'9f16 3G TIIM M21/~3M Ny1d 2k31dy 30V1- ~~ S39NVMYJ JNy 'M3V~3L1 Nyld WO>~ (JJJy dU Q31y710N 6y 6a91dyH7 HlIM £91JIMIy2iQ 3S3d1 ~Oilddy aNV U1 J w WJ ~~ w <.;Q ~~U LPUZ ~WU NUU ~UV ?,~,o0p ~~jlL oJIJWUI Kw<LL O°'~ ~~W U~ N } Q m ~~~U ulU DUI QaO~ OrtiO ~OJw ttUyy uiwWW ww1~JZ LI i(dZ JZ~U' ~f~~ ~~~w ~xw0 WI-ZwCI (]`~q~w-- w~GJ ~ I ~ I ... Lnl~i~ 1~ ~Ji lwiY ~QU]U. ~../ ~1 ~ ~~ W -~ ~~ ~ /--1 W 7 1 \J _ /-i a i ;~ _Q R'i I~~ (~( ~h J1 O W~ q ~ ; o 1-° ~~...1 ~ mr? H A b N S r r 0 O N i N Y ~ ~o$~ ~T~~ ~~~~~ C Om~~ ~~-n~ l7rn 1r~ ~y. Xm 3 ~~yrn.. ~ ~ Hyi m~;~ ~~ym z~-Cr ~b7 $ ~ ~ g~~~ Nny1N~ ~m~~ o ~ ~ ~~~g ~' ~ ~~m~ vA J~..{ T (~ '`b Nr ~rN rn~p O~p11 ~p~~1IIO '~L-1 CSJ nn~ (~nN Ofll~ V ~ Z~~ mN 1/HE APPROVE THESE DRAWIN69 wiTH GMMI6E5 AS an.~, INDICATED OP ANY) PROM PLAN REVIEW ANY GNAN6E5 MADE APTER PLAN REVICW YULL BE 9UB.IaGT TO A 91YSt~ D ~~ ppP A~ ~~ N ~~~~ ~ a ~ Z N _ ~ / \ Y~i? w~~w ~ F~ ~ ~~ A L J ~ I i ~ i ~ P b~ Z~ ~ ~ b xuX ax ~AN~ ~_ d~bQ ^°~~:~ Z N DATE. nom. NOVAK- 'GlSSTOM H DATE D6i OR 4 y Z „ c~ u O r 1~ ~ ~ rn ~ y d ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ i ~ . ~J` ~--a • ~ C'~ U (~ U. d~ O 9 N APPROVE Ta•ese~v~ GNM/BCy As IGATm (IP ANY) PROM PLAN REVIB'l ANY GHAN5E5 ~~ ADE AFTER PLAN REVIEW WILL CE ~IH.JEiGT TO A CHPN6@ C+RDP? FEE 1'PR GH~N6E. ~~ O }F 4 G J _~~E +AN i z1 rmP N I PLAN ~GVIEI DATE m N A P/A~ FIr1 REG. RCT. RF4 RET N D i D r NH zI N i i§ H C\ ~~~ N-p~ Y ~ ~~z h Srn~~ m 2 rn mtl~0 ~ ~D~ ~~Z-qil zr-[ 1 p ~~iit7i (~ j ~~~- ~T~O r h Om~rn (~j~ l to p ~Y~ ~~~ c ~~~~ ,- ( d~~ h T~ ~,NmDN rn~p Z O~ OOA~ ~~ m`~ ~30 ~~in -I ~1Y ~~n~ zn ~rn ~iN DATEi DATE. A ~ ~_ O n =Y D mA Ai Oi Ag ~~ m N N ~~ Y ~~ a r M~ N ~ b a z r-i a a -~J I I /-lW ~465~ GSMT. 2'-1' f 2-7650 FXD. I,-q ~ a O n ~ ti h ~ _ ROOF TRU55E5 _ • 74' O.G. ~_ a u.IN ~ ~' 0 ~ a !- ~ (\ 1 A JI ~ Y U ~ N mm IJ ~ C r \ /w' ~ ~ 1 e. ~~ .,e ~ b' PATIO D~~ ° ~ O ~ t II ~ I\ II U T ~ \ \ / I /11 \ \. o ~ u ~ ~ n 1' m ~ ~ ~ Z ul ,D r \ I I o lAi \ I ~ ~ _ ~ -3~ \ `~ ~ a A u " II ~ N I ~ A 3 OO \ \ ss -+ \ O ~ m i / V ~I to rn \ \ ~ ~ ii ROOF TRUSSES _ N ~ ~` \\ 77F00 II _ • 74" O.G. u 11 v ~ y~ --S \\ 11 n Ld O I ~ ~ ~ / ® u'o ® \ ii ~ / y 1 _ / ~/ I ii ~r // a 1 al ~A 1 fn Z ~ ~ S~ ~, / f Ti a~ '-UO O uN - b ~ 3,-b. _ 53 R a I NI ~ ~~ u ` ° -T I'lTl ~ -{ ~ rn ~ W Oil !~- r '~ rnQyl~ ~r~~ i~ r-~ No\JII~`D~'I 11111~~~ AI I ~tl7 \li ~1~ 6 ~~ I u \ z ~ // ~--~ y m i .~ ~: ~ ,. - L C ~ \ \ i \ / ~ z L-J T-b' u \ ii /// IDnOr~~ 53R NQi \ > ~ u \~\ O \ o " VI ~ 1 II m I ~n A O ~ b O• I' r 0 ' , A.._ ~~~' ~ I1 ~I I P m ~ / ~~ 7C / I I I ~ I I ~,-b. 10,-4• I I I 1 ~ 7' .~ \` I I I I I I i I I I I I I I 4'-I' Tn a `" 5'14: / U)O ~ `/ 7 5!R ~~ ~„~:,~ c.~o / n ~~ ~; c r -' I /~~ ~~ ~ IZ I ~ ~® 1 ~ i ~~ ~ mI m~ ~ b i~ T I~I -,, 5 ~ b ~ 0 sss Wo \ ~ ~, \ '~ N ~ h \ ~T \ C\ 1 _ I I A 1 I / i ~ _ ~ it-- 0 I~ (\ rn ROOF TRIH5e5 • 74° O.G. Ot ~ ~/ T t, ' F / \ / ~ ~ O Inn ~i ~ D ~~ Z ~ yy t~mTl~ :U -nr gg Y ZI~ -Crn~ gg ~j~ ~Oz ~ ~ It ~a~~ ~ a m s ~ / \ ~ ~ l r~or ' z ~~mz ( Q O Z I N m ~ ~ ril~ ~ rnN ~ Kri o z ~ ~ ~. ~ a Y ~ "' ~ M~.~.I 1~ r~ D fn ~iiT7i ~ g i ~;ng~~-11 Y m OrnOn ~ ~Ap Pty>in ,-U zQ rn ~~ O ~ ~ / \ i ~ A~~~ C ~ uy, N(F 1~ o0 .4 'I /~ ~~ ~ r ~ rn-(~m ~~~~ .AZ~O ~ ni1~'n ~A Xll~u ~N u ~p 'O.+ '~~I I ~ I I /\ o ~ ~ ~'% n-<~ ~~~ u ~, CrJ ~ ~ o ~~ ~y w,~ti~l ~~, a; z ~~ ~ I ~~~ I ~ ~ ~ 'j~- ~ ~ NrnD~' rn~0 00~(~j .. _Op0 dZ f~tlN r I 7$I I \/ ~ 3 ~Y~ d , 'x' ~m~ =1~ ~~~ NNN~ 4\ `~ XT ~ Ai . O Lp ~~ DMZ =~-, ~~ C / \ . m~.a Y~~ Z jz \ / z rn~ rm r rnN \ 1 1'E: APPROVe T}!3E DRAWIN63 WITH GHAN6C5 I9 ~ DATE ~~ PLAN P/A. FIt1 tDIGATED (IF ANr) FiO~-1 PLAN RtYIEw. AHr GHANbES , . NOVL~iI{-FLECK INC. IEw IHm AL Rec. REr. IADe APTGR PLAN REVICW WILL HC 511B.JeGT TO A I~ GHAN6E ORDER PEE PL9Z GHANBE. ~ DATES 'GU9TOM HOMe EUILD@i' euc»eiumlz rooo•a DATE REG. RET. ~ _,i. P 9'p,n b' ~~ IJ ' CopylYt ileQ~ ~~ VI/ 7-2650 GSMT, f 2-2650 FXD. IJ O ~ O ~ I-rl 1 Ind m ~. I ~ ~ Ap ~a e g,-~. 5'-I' ti ~ ROOF TRU55E9 ,~ ~! s 24' O.G. ' t07~ p m oT ~ -ail ~ A ~ N D ~ C Dr /J P~ N -I ~ Z ~\ j i~ N Q A \ 5-0~ I IJ 5- /illl\.~/ 3 m \\ / \~ 11 I 6' PATIO DR.~ b' PATIO DR. ~5 50 SLDR 20 6 S.H. 55 ~ c~ \ :. N ~ /// ~~ II~ I O® n m / / 'W ~ J I // p A I Q /// ice/ I II ,\ ZW ~JI IN m N I~ / IV\I ~ ____ ~/ 1~ ~I II ~~ ' ~y~IT~ ~ iA \ ii O ~ \I b I \1 ~ 5'-6' i / \ \ ~ II ~ ~ 1 I m z I i,°i / III -_ I ~z I / / u, ~' III g /// ~ 1 ~ o - l^- - / 9. ROOF TRU99E9 II m// Ao I n ~ ~ II I \ A A ~ 6 z ~rZ~ it ~ -'rn oA r ; nl ~ / ~ / II 5 (11 F.F. ,~ 0• ~ ® O 6I ~ /~ tPpp:a -~ II 1 o LINEN N~ ~~~ aO T ~ ~ I; n l ~/ n•-4• A m z r^~a 2•-b` / II ~ ~ ~ - ~ o ~ 3 0 I II y;-y I~ r D o ~~ i, 'n rn rn /I'\ REFRIb. ~ O N I~ I I \\ DN C. .I - ~ ~~ ~ ` \~ o ,„o / I ,1 ~~..~ d ®~\\ ~q~ 9640 II DR I A ~,~ ~ Z r7 II L---- '~ ~ ~ I r m~~'Uae i o'o Y IA I ~~__IE-~ / 5 -1~ -.- I t 1 I og r-------- I m n 1 I ~: 1 I 1 I .n ~ ~ m ~ ~ I~ I 1 I - T o~ ~i A \ ~ \ \ ~ \ I I~ Ib I I 1 I I I I I N~ %~ ><~ N~ 0 - ~ \ A I' ~° I ~ I I n ~~_I. ~ \ x l \ _.~j I I I I v f I 2 1 I I A ~ O D \1 G~ A I I I ~ ~ I aW N(1 ~ ~~ ~ N~ I ~ r k~ • ~ n1~ D I I N I I • N ~, (~ a~ I I ~ ( A ROOF 7RU59E3 i ( I ` ~jj ~ U ~ ~ • 24' O.GO.G. i I I 2•_q• ~ t r I I 1 1 `~ 7 . 24'-O' ~-_---- I ---b I ~,~ 'y z fD O a N Q d ~ ~ r x 'tn ~ •~ ~ ~ z -. ~ ~ V1 APPROVE THESE DRAWIN I / \ / \ ~ - \' / \ / F-y N \ / \ / ~ \ ./. \ / I~ `~ G / \ / ~ \ ?C ~ s ~ 8 / \ ~~ i a~ „ ~ c ~Z a~ a tir..l 8 o ~ .. nJ,±c ,C I ~ ~~I I ~$I ----J- r uumu~ mmmn mui P,i„n OOOmO n(\ In u~ to o3~i2v -I xI tJ A to ~ ~-I , 10 ~j ip Z mmm\~ ~ -IJ - ,I~ ~~ ~ ~ U'.L a~ c -V 41x0 h IJ'~ \ I~ n I.= m' 7, i~ zm~r O r m I- YY~~ . ~~rn= Yo-m^ K~my y3Ay Amlz ~rrn~ ~~~ ~=z ~rn~' ~Zz nj0 In n ii I U ~~N ~ A~ Am71~ jrnm~ mQr~~Z ~~ .Or~i OX tril v \ j ~ mss; ~~ _ vrn;0rt r~~Drn ( rn~~ni2 ~ ~pY~ z~~r ~g0 ~v x ~1 p, l7iDNN D~ - u'~ 3~DN iZ~2 m~~ (~ z~r~ N~ D OO ~ I ~Drnf,l T ((~~ Nrn Y'^ `nrn0 2 ~~II DUpA (1 (1 ,Q 1 p30 C~ (~ N yy DyP ~I =~(,C rz $ ~ ~ 0 m v Nr- -' i Z~A ~p 0 z ~rn r = rn~ N ANE APPRCNE 7HE9E DIRAWINbS WITH GFjNJ6@4 ~NDIGATED (IF ANY) RROr~ PLAN REVIEW. ANY GH MADE AP2Tt PLAN REVIEW WILL DE 9U6.nGT TO ^1:01X) GFIANEE OR4ER FEE PEg3 GHAN6E. vATE~ DATE. y~l ~ _ . ~ g . ~~ ~ ~ S ~ A HA i ~ \ / U F L+J ~ L J LL b j • . U DATE 4FG RET. u:.Sn W•~:~n; n.~l~, I.m~,;~~,lunannm~~.: HIf1GlIri IN InIM\IN!:,m;7_I nMl Vri Ike. Id Oil: f11. 29 21NIf fk•nrl Ov 'IA~tilm Illsnn' .__._.--_ -_--__._ Cupy6'ri LeQ~' - 2a.-0. ra --------~ \ I x'------T \ I '= I 1 RooF TRUSSES _ 14 I 1 • 24' O.G. I ~y u I I I ~ ~' I _ I Ip m I 1 I A I I $ I ~ A I 1 I ~ = ~~ j I I rm p ~ / m ~ ~ I l u y ~ / z m I u v R / "' / I ~ V 72~C / ~~ I N I I I I ~ x o n I ~ I I A s I 22'-0• L------ --•~ / I .I L d ti1~v ~ rn - J> ~ A ?.. x rn ~ ' N ;,-- ~, o \'~ IJ ~'~ L1 ~:?, \ =A iz~~ ~ / ~NIJ / - __ IttI - <~j ` ~I ~ (=1 ~ ~N~I RANGE ~R ( li \\ ~n A ® ~,- ~ ~- 9• \ 01p - / _ O .i- // I PANTRY / (\ ~ ~ W r / -t- ---- III ~\ O ~ _ y it / /' '~ O 0 r / / \ / / I Ir u~ iu X \\ ~ O LI ~ .~.I I Fey ~ UI ~\ 1\ Or \~ T I A ~;IA ~Wn~1~ ~' \ t~ ~ . ~S ~i x \ \ rP ~ II®~ I L----- 11~ J \ ~~ \\ \~ Z II ~ S d R WO I \ . =~ 1 .- Z II I / - (ll II P b'-b• b._2. to ~~d~{// ~ ~ II ~ DpP O'O ~ r^u ~ ^' N-'-'O O ROOF TRU95C5 II~ mN / O SNO ~ r N 5 / R ~ ~24" O.G. ji -Olp ~ ~~ylroT O fn ~ (n~~ A d ------ II ~~_ \ a ~ m \ \ • / I~ ~ \\ \ m~~ s k _ 4'-g' 1 ~' S / II ~ o I~ \ O u ~_ / II ~ ~0 DA ~~ 0 z '~ ®~ ~ ` zI / II / / CY ~ ON m rn T ~ ~ ~ II 3~ z~ 0 ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~~ d~ ~ ~ / 5050 SLDR. 6• e...,.. ____ ~A I~ ~m 00 ti i Yr O ~U r `..~ ^~ -'3 ~ Z ~ ~O~y pm ~ Dmr~iF ~r iingr~0 Y nN ~ ~ ~ ~ _ m VT ~ -I o ~1 R1 d o -/~ h ~ / r ~ Or~i~rn rn~Sn ~ < S zm~ A ~ 3 3~ m~ym r j A A bN ~ a N. 1 .~ ry ~ ~ D ~ m y O n Nr rn 'x ~(• ~ p z 01 p 8 ~ ~P ~ ~Q Y r Z Z u' U~yNN D _ Zm N fn ~~ ~u ~ x` ~ ~ 11 f ~ m~ N C AOD~ iz O z ~~ ~ ~ N ~' V -Z O ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ A TY ~ 'J N O ~ ~ ~ Nm~N ~~~ A ~ A~ A u / \ / ~ Y-~i ~ / \ / N / ~ / ~ ~ / ~ / r . z t ~, L ' w d ~i . '". M xr b~ a A ' \ \ 1 y \ _ \ / '''u 4 \ / ~ / \ Z ~rn~~ O ..2yyo~ rn y?O-I <~7< Y-AY AZ3? "~N~~ O t7 Zw K m'~-'-' T30 pD~ A~. f^nK~ rn (~~A S rn May 2, 2003 Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Deputy City Administrator City of Monticello SOS Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Initial Comment Letter Featherstone (Gold Nugget) City of Monticello Project No. 2003-03C WSB Project No. 1160-79 Dear Mr. O'Neill: We have completed an initial review of the preliminary plat documents submitted by Pioneer Engineering and have outlined the principle issues that should be addressed prior to the preliminary plat approval. Those issues are noted as follows: EXISTING CONDITIONS Topo should be provided a distance of 300 feet beyond all boundaries. This is important information in order to make sure that there are no drainage facilities, drainage issues, or other concerns that may be a detriment to the project that would need to be addressed at this stage of the project. 2. There is a 50-foot proposed UPA easement along the north side. The developer should provide information as to what the current status of the easement is, and whether or not this is a realistic proposed easement width. PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposed right-of--way width for future Cedar Street and the stub street to Trunk Highway 25 should be widened to a minimum of 80 feet. In addition, the intersections with 85`h Street and the stub street to Trunk Highway 25 should be addressed to see if a widened right-of--way is necessary to accommodate turn lanes or possible median improvements. The location of future driveways at the intersection locations will be important information to include in the preliminary plat documents so that median improvements can be addressed to accommodate the future traffic volumes. 2. City staff and the developer should work with the Kjellberg's Mobile Home Park to address an acceptable location for the termination of Cedar Street. (': I N7,A'U!)N'.1'11'F_M1,f{'iu50?03-lu.d..c Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Deputy City Administrator May 2, 2003 Page 2 Street A will include both residential and industrial property accesses. The street width and the transition from industrial to residential property should be addressed. 4. The current City policy on townhome area streets is to make sure that an adequate turnaround or loop street is available for garbage collection. In addition, stub streets cannot exceed 150-200 feet of depth in order to satisfy fire department requirements. On previous projects we have encouraged providing loop streets as opposed to turnarounds because we would prefer to not have garbage trucks backing up in residential areas. It is appropriate to develop an official policy on this issue. It appears that the northerly towi~llome area could be revised to a loop street scenario which would address our concerns. ~. The proposed townhome separation is only 68 feet, which is less than our minimum on private street areas of 74 feet. 6. Overhead electric is shown along 85r~' Street. It would be our reconunendation that the utility be relocated, or preferably, buried. 7. The engineer should provide a soil analysis of the site for review. STREET DETAILS The proposed street section depends on the underlying soils and will be dependent on the actual soil survey. 2. The collector street section is not adequate as is currently proposed. The bituminous path should be 2 inches of bituminous, 6 inches of Class 5, and 12 inches of granular. GRADING PLAN The collector street design through the center of the project should be evaluated for street width. Sidewalk should be proposed on both sides of that street. 2. All cul-de-sac islands should include a 40-foot internal radius and that island area should be an outlot assigned to the adjoining lots. The developer should make sure that utilities are not placed within the island if they intend to landscape the island azea. • 3. The lateral park area should be improved with berming and landscaping to create a separation from the adjoining lots. (': I LPIN/JUI PS.TL;Agp10 i(I?ll3-ju. J ~c Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Deputy City Administrator May 2, 2003 Page 3 • 4. It will be necessary to develop an attractive pond design and vegetation plan that will involve some lining of the stormwater basin area and other vegetation to create attractive stormwater basins. 5. It will be necessary to develop a future profile of 85`x' Street and determine the potential reconstruction cost for the Developer's Agreement. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN The design of the utilities should be completed to City standards. Currently, the plan does not address spacing guidelines, storm sewer design, and sanitary sewer issues. MISCELLANEOUS 1. All street width dimensions should be noted as face of curb to face of curb. 2. No street widths will be allowed less than 24 feet. 3. The City must have access to all storm manholes in the rear lot areas with an acceptable stable subgrade to support a large truck. This will involve Class ~ with topsoil and seed on the surface. In addition, access to all stormwater basins will require a 30-foot easement area. 4. The path in the south park area should be connected directly to the path along 8~`" Street and not zig zag through the park area. The path to the north, which will be used to access the stormwater basin, should be a 7-ton design with a 10-foot width to accommodate City maintenance vehicles. 6. A parking lot will be required for the park area on the south side. The remainder of the park should be graded at a 2% slope to accommodate future park development. 7. This plat needs to be submitted to Mn/DOT and Wright County to provide comments. As is apparent from my comments, there are still issues that we feel should be addressed prior to approving the preliminary plat. Addressing these issues in conjunction with the Planning Commission review will allow the Planning Commission to review the actual lot configuration and design issues prior to sending this plat forward to the City Council. (' ^, N7NU011'.1177x61/'IO50?03-/u.d~K Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Deputy City Administrator May 2, 2003 Page 4 • Please give me a call at (763) 287-7190 if you have any questions or comments regarding this information. Sincerely, WSB do Associates, Lac. Bret A. Weiss, P.E. City Engineer cc: John Simola, City of Monticello Steve Grittman, NAC Horst Grazer, Gold Nugget Development Paul Cherne, Pioneer Engineering sb • • (': I H7NUUN:Sl771,411'Y1511?II3yu.Ju~~ Planning Commission Agenda - 05/06/03 9. Public Hearing -Consideration of preliminaryplat approval of the Otter Creek Crossing commercial subdivision Applicant• Otter Creek LLC (JO) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Review of the Otter Creek Crossing plat has been delayed pending completion of land acquisition of the roadway (Chelsea) need to serve the plat. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to open public hearing and table consideration of preliminary plat request. 2. Motion to approve with conditions that it must meet city platting standards and on the condition that the roadway access ownership has been resolved. 3. Motion to deny preliminary plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends alternative 1. This request will be on the agenda as soon as the land for roadway is under control by the developer of City. SUPPORTING DATA Reduced copy of plat ~ v ~ ~'. • • Y W~ WU ~Z U~ WO ~' U 0 ~~ 0 Y U D Q 2 U Z D W ~~ O~~ Q J a Q z J W F e "• L a ~ r ~ 5°g°8o~ So °~~°E°e6e"ate -° ° " x s -E•~ ~~ sIC ae ~a°~~ ~~.~ ~ a ~ ~~b~xg~gz~.~:~~saassps"s3o-pW ~ s~ ~ ~_-y°er~€ £ ~.FS °~¢8~oe €~~~~Sr88°8ii •• a.--'i$ s ,~° g 8'"~ bS,3~e. jQ„N o ~ D5~ g °g a~-°; xsgi~°°S;s d - °~ ~ ~~gaa5sgg~'~ °~ a~ SQ-5g;pfi5_ym- ~a °c, °c~o>< a _E w „3 a'-,sr ~zin - ~"$° ~~., af~S~s x_~s 5.°, S~~L~$Vs_°~' E ~•~ ~ e y-" ~8~a ~~ .~1 ~ ~fr~$ ~~~°~aa .aka°'~~W~ E<~'s"~ewa ~ x B c ~:~~~~~g~ o €g 5 ,,77 yP ~ O e~ Na$O"° 11 I - L Y rceay a =9'•~9$~~.e ~ ~S~PE:.e ~.~~ § Ci frra ~- XssS '~5~2~ ;~-gJOES.a ~s ~:_ a 8~g E ~ $ 3g- ~ ~ °~ o~ sM ~~~g~~;'~~~'~a-~~sra$ ~~~~~5~-Ws z x 9-g 9 3~ ~ - ~'~"~.~.~ F" 5g oa°°~B.cm~a~~SAa~~sx;7~efrE-~~8..u° 5 ee ~~r ~ ~ p. ag ,r x~°~h.ax~5 5 ~. °R -§°~ ~ f~~g~1~°sss sg=~ ~E4ae ~ Q ~~~ s ~' ya YE- a~ :~ ~$ $°~'s gra- y ~~ ~3i W$~W~ a~sW~ ~~',.°ga{~i g- U ~ ~y a" s" sa ~ '3 3 a ~o~~x~xe~g ~ fn aa~s£a N~`~a"~8°e~§ a°~ I~~•=~E. E~ W ~ ~ ~ E em ~ ~< ~~ ~ Fi f E ~ $ ~g ~E'.$~ R s w ~g .az ~g7ogp~ g~~5ab"^s~:.e9~.-~Sa° ° ~ .N; "a ~= ~g ~fi B~sE~~x~fi y' E ~Eo ~ Q- ~N ~ S~ ~ESmS.$~jE~''~°n~~~~~°~a ~w ~~8,i y,~ ~ 1. - N ~s v b ~$ °b ~ q~mE ~'E `855 •9 'G` I ~ °' sP'~`8g 8e«~5.~8~E 5~ s~2 san a W e o d .s°8 b _ ~ x~ S 8°a,i~a5=g6 ~n E ;.~5 8RO1~ ~ tin - ~'° ;+~ ~ m rn~ o€ $ ~s~~b.,~ sc'a.~$;s~ p d$ ,,~<~ a S b _~ s~ 4= x~$~„~~ € fi sa°~ ..-~' s'"°• a s"- ~ ~-sue ~ ~~ y ~ `~ a~`oM , .s ~ a .r o d _~ ~ ~gg~6~° -~_ 3~a 8 3 E. , d' ~, ~ d s g ar.a-a° Z ~& ~ ~~ 8~s~a^.-~'~a sdo-~'.°:csEs; y~ 3 a i ~ ~a x n a- = a"'o~" ssga - s- a a .~,~"sr p °b o LLg €~ a ~~~~aa~~~~ _- N- -- o w a -- - - - ---- - -- $ ~ ' m > Z 3~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y~ ~~ ~ ~ g ~~ °:~ p ~ A A A I A I I A I I I I I I N Y I I Y I I I I I N I I I N I I N I N N I I N I • o o k o m:~eomia~o~aa~na.~.x.Ismelc6t~x•d8oa94~6R~t®~omnCeojon ~I / ,~, Dy `~ ~ I ~ O• I / ~• ~~ W ~O Nttj vM } ~~ ~\ I ~ ~,. W ~= N vhn~ ;n v~ ~~~~ h~'oN ~~~N , m U 1 ~~P~r,~~~PS 0~ ti~ ~ `O ~~~~~~ \ ~1~0 ~h~`~k 0~ ~ti.1ti 9ti ` \ \ ~ /~ I 6 \ I ~c/~ \~ `~\ ~ ~q/~ % ~°S ~yl~ / ~ d. 7C ~ 1 \~ ~e • , .`. ,/ . ..., \ w / I ~ ~ ~~ ~ tin ~~~ \:~ 6`/Q~\~ x"~~ ~/,~ ~Ob~i{J `~n°u /, / \ _.... •...~ ,..,, ... _. .... ... n~~`' \~~ . ~ ~ ° i n s ~ \ \ ,\ ~ ~•. __..` k ~_ 1 1 n '~~: ~ ` ~ ' \\ \ r \~ ` ~~ 0330) M„[6,Zf.68N €_ ___..--, i ~~''' \~, ~ - ~ (Sb'3YY) M„LZ,8F88N ,, ~ J 33 5'l FzZ / ! r ,.... ~~ ,,... .,ti', .. f^ ", .. .._ .;• .' / ;.,..-' ` \~ ~. f ~` , XMS `ZX3N lMlg~ - ~~ __`~ i ~ ., . ~/ f~ ' ~t~~oo:: era / _ ~. (033U) M,OL,/C6iN ~~ ' i / .~... .... / -..,._. .-.-' Q. `•. \ . IP ~ ~'F ~r _- (030}9Z S 1 ~. I ' , ;,A B SY3W) YB 0 ,. ~ t x _ .... . .. ~~ 1 ..... ,... ,... ...... R~. ~- ~` ! ' J o~ e / . 'O J 1 \ --~. / ~ \~. ` I~ ;+t \ \ `~9\~yo, ?Ig'0~ re`s I I t . ~ ~~yy () `"` e ~~~._~ ~~g~ 1 ~° ~~ ""~ ~ ~ ~aa ~ , ,.. ~ _`; ~~ ~~~ ~~ .~ ~ TWO s~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ a .-- u I A4 gga o N } a~ ~~ w °~ d Z ~,N <~+ Q'~z5~ rc c)~Ns Y r~~. ~ y W ~ `o U ~« ~~~_~, ~ZWV~ 0 N J J M U '`3~ •; U 2 ~ ~3 U ~ c ~.~ •°~~ w m 8 ~~~~ $°s~ ~~~ o mn a~~ atl~ o g z rc sa~$ ~ 5~~= fi O $a~° T~N + Y $~~ ~ ~ Ba-^ ~ rang ~ o ZN O W K ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ s~~ 4 ~yE g ~~ C ~a ~r ,_ ~z,,.. „o,, n b~' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City of Monticello Planning Corn~nission on May 6, 2003 at 6 PM, in the Monticello City Hall to consider the following matter: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration ofa request for preliminary plat approval of the Otter Creek Crossing commercial subdivision. Location: West quadrant of Interstate 94 and 90`h Street NE. (A co~rplete legal description can be viewed at Monticello City Hall) Applicant: Otter Creek, LLC Written and oral testi~r~ony will be accepted on above subject, and all persons desiring to be heard on referenced subject will be heard at this greeting. Note: Decisions of the Planning Commission will be subject to the approval or denial of the City Council and will be considered at one of the following City Council meetings: Monday, May l2, 2003 or Tuesday, May 27, 2003 (due to the Memorial Day holiday) at 7 p.ir., at the Monticello City Hall. Jeff O eputy City Administrator ._ r~^~M .~_..~ ~, ~ -:. _: 1 ! ~~f I _..-- / i ~~~~ , ~ ~! ~ \~~ L u ~ ~i; ( ~- ;/r-, ~J J\ /~ ~~~~ i~ ~^ ;i ~, t' fig ~I~ i~ .co ~ ~ I ~. ti~ ~ • ~ r ~ 1 / / ~ ~ :~ _',~ •' ~ ,,:, `~ ~,~, 1 ~ ~ f `~~~~~~ l / ~ ~~ / ~ ~ ~ V_ m ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~' ,- 1 / ~~ ~ ~~~`. ~ ..~ o ~ ~ 1 ~. r I ~ a ~ rr~ % ~ ~ / •/ t ' z~ m ~6 t ~^ ~ i~ s : ~ ~8.~ ~~ ~A ~ r yv ~ of ~~ ~~ a/ 0?TER CREEK CROS51NG5 . 1 ro~nC[LLq r+uou rN. _ w VUW ~~ R1O01~ ~.r ~' w ~.r ~~ _" ~~ y~ ~T lllE ~ r `'r'r" ...... auw ~. I w~° +~`w ~1 R~~ kiR~~ wrrw.r.M+•~.rr ~rw/ T HrN 7:X 11'D~~4'7 ..I ~ocs.w otmuron ~I /~ 5 Q ~'_ t 7p Y ~Q i ag ~ ~r J ~; m 6~ »nnwx~ rjsn~ muu _.- ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ! ._ .. ~ _ T ~ I _ _ L_T _ 1r...~-~.. ` ! I >/ I a !! I ! I ~i --~ -~_ / ~i i b P ~ / ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~/ ~ ~ ! / \~ ~ / / -- ---~ r~ • • / \ ` j ~~ J \ /~ r /! ~_,! b a I I. I. III I e ICI i ilk J S .LIS3IHY~ Too/TOO[~j ....................a,L't oisistlnx x?x.............. CST.T.C£6ZS6 Yd3 LS,~£T .Zo ~/ i~~ I iii ~ i~~ ~ ~ j' I 1 ~'~/ _ ~ t 7 l' ' 0 sb s 0 J LL J 0~ F- F U~ ,~~ ~a ~O ~` 5 s k, 8 R ~i .Y ~°a°y~m~~„N£~«bY HW bN$Y ~o'~~goa~a H~B`o m~.8 ~~.~R«R ~ ~o~as b~W~ 0 ~' W$oc ~..6 Zdc°~,°8a~o bS5°yw~t~o yry H ° ~1L~uG••P~S~ ~$~~LJrO Y«o~W$0 V 5r o.snntt~YYS_bc«:. itEvTN~~~$~Hoo•E~H,e_'«~.£s N ~G bmw Oi95°«vy;.~`'Z°' ~ awo bm HqE oESd w ~ EE.gaL~„ ado g ``~-~ ,~~ EE n~ r ~ ~ 3 Rx..~,a'~c°,aob E~S~=~i~a5~8~Em g§bL~~ «~ o~~~n«C`=BOHY Py ~C~L~°$WVG Sa ° VI ° '1 GG Y p2~ ~ ~~ o~3a~.~g~~~'Eo~~a~mapg~€bo~a~~~s~~~ SH ba+,~8~e°~•~ Sao $: R.a~~~ Eo«6R~gB~s ~.a ~~SE°:~°8°~'°DVpB~oy~=g°`~°pa~^~55°$£eE~°~ d o~ EYPb b~O ~3E~~ry~~a=En ~~~YYRRU$~~zz ~~t~~€c6 }r~c~Pv'b.~O~~. ~ ~.°- c4b~onsv~$... E.°.o`oewSwo Rw6~EvS ~~v56~n°~3~ a 8 ~ Z - o~ I ' I / Z / I / U i ~ .'~~ /2 i ~/~ ~ I/ / Z ~f ~ ~ / ~~ / ~ I / // / / / / _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ W --- ~ ,~, ~.. ' ~ -- •-- ~ / 4, °i ~ ~ ;. , ,; '~ ~ ~ .,o ~.` ~~~ M. W T. i X W / / \ ,,\ .. \ ~~.' Z 0 X w z z_ Q n T,TTa ~.:~.-~-- <' ^;, ~ ~~\ .' ~ ~ ~ ^~ ~ .b ~\~ .\ ,,, ;;; ~~/ II:~ ~~ fi ~_ ~. ~: \,\ f c ~ ~~ \~1 \ ~ \~ R ~~\ ~~ ~ ~~ ,; ~ ~ ,~ i I l` - ~p~yq~pL~'/~ \ \~~ fl~i e Il ~b ~ N IY \\ \ V~ \ ~\~. ~~ ~/;-mss, ~~~ ~~~~,. ~~•., iii/ ~ s ~R J ~ ~'.;. / I ~~^'j // / ~ ~ ~/~~ ~ I -~ ~ ~ \ ~~ :< \ ~- !6 fifi a 1'/ s ~ IT! :R • • N M O Z o~ Q m W= Zx Z W Q Z N O O ~~~~ U v N ~ W$^'~ W o~~ ~C~..r~JJ \ ~ F-ZU~ FO U J M U ~~ 3UZ O ~~ L CJ ~ ,., ,~ ~,~ 3~E W^° m d ~ ~~~~ YYxx~ipp~`` [~S ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~e,~, ~~~~ ea ~~a~ Y O ~~~ 5 ~~~~ ~? ~~ 9~~ ~ 3 ~ ~~~ ~~E 8 ~b • ANNEXATION CRITERIA Staff Recotmiendatian ID Approx. Acreage Comp Plan Guided Concept Plan Preliminary Plat Utilities 0 MW Johnson +~ Shermer ~ +~ Farr x 0 Jim Shultz '~ _. +~*. Ken Shultz '~ "~+~' ; Ken Shultz ~ Future Future ~ Future 0 Chris Klein 00 Loren O'Brien 0 Gold Nugget " Gold Nugget o Gold Nugget Groveland Iv ~ Chadwick ~ 1 27.06 (R-1) Approved Pending eed Study 2 21.47 (R-1) A roved A roved vailable 3 38.96 (R-lA) Pending Pending le 4 39.78 (R-1 A) A roved A roved vailable 5 - 17.39 Med. Den. Attach Pending Pending vail.able 6 34.55 (R-1 A) Pendin Pendin vailable 7 107.40 Ind / R-1 Not Cont guous Yet 8 39.60 (R-1 A) Not Cont guous Yet 9 67.55 (R-1) Not Cont uous Yet 10 37.ss (R-1) None Available None Availabl Available 11 56.72 (R-1) None Available None Available Available 12 39.96 (R_1) Under bevel t 13 ~ 40.35 (R-1) Under bevel t t Avail. 14 ~ 31.03 Ind t Avail. 15 ~ 26.27 (R-1) A roved A roved vailable 1s I so.so Ind ~ Approved Pending vailable + =Proceed with annexation by Ordinance or Joint Resolution 0 =Wait for development of potential new MOAA Agreement or completion of necessary studies/plarmin~v • PARK DEDICATION FEES SURVEY OF 4/15/03 ~" -~' Albertville 763-497-3384 $1,500/unit for residential/ $5,000/acre for comm. &ind. $875/per unit; 10% land value -Council makes determination Becker 763-261-4302 on cash/land Big Lake 763-263-2107 1,400 er lot residential; no charge on comm. or ind. 0..~ acre o. lane iur eacF~ 75 peopie. A single family lot is 3.5 people; two-family lot is 6 people; Cash in lieu of land is $250/single family lot, $500 for two family lot; $125 for a one bedroom unit plus $75 for each additional bedroom. In addition there is a $250 surcharge per unit which is above and Buffalo 763-682-1181 be and and land or cash dedication $2,200/unit residential; $10,000/acre commercial/$3,GG0/acre Champlin 763-421-8100 industrial $1,615/unit residential; $3,000/acre commercial; $2,000/acre Elk River 763-441-7420 industrial $2,600/unit residential; $5,000/acre industrial; $6,500/acre Maple Grove 763-494-6000 freeway-commercial $800/per unit; on apartments $800/unit plus $50 for all Rockford 763-477-6565 bedrooms over one No commercial or industrial park dedication $825/unit residential; $2,500/acre commercial; $5,000/acre Rogers 763-428-2253 commercial 000 unit residential; $3,000/acre commercial/ $2,000/acre St. Michael 763-4997-2041 industrial; $2,000/acre public/institutional 0 t l< ~~o e S ~ C,Q ~J~f 5 uAr t /lore. - Cor~,~~~~~~~1:~~1'u so`i.~ l ~ f~%~~. - ~6~ooo~Ac~e V t~ '~ °Z.~ QOO ~ ~C ~'2 ~2r Oeo~/}~ t' 1 ~ ceu5 ~~,o l ~3,ooo/Lo~Me2c+~ G~a~.P~, $t.M~;~l..o~e~1' ~«C~~uP~ s~ • The Monticello Industrial Development Committee would like to submit the following recommendations for goals/projects within the Community Vision framework. First and foremost, our mission is to maintain and increase the industrial tax base and to create jobs in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. We realize the economy has slowed industrial development. Yet we believe in the very near future, Monticello will become a prime industrial area and we want to be able to supply the future land needs. Recommendations: We would like to see the planning/zoning commission, as well as city council, preserving as much industrial land as possible. We recognize that often developers drive projects and may have their own visions. However, we recommend that all current industrial sites remain zoned as industrial or I-1 A. Changing the zoning to a P.U.D or commercial development erodes the limited industrial land we currently have available. Establish a task force for implementation of the comp plan. We recommend using people outside of city hall to do the research. This may or may not provide a different perspective for the community. 3. Once long term planning has been adopted, keep to these plans. This will be our best avenue for shaping the community. 4. The IDC has long been a proponent of purchasing land for a city owned industrial park. We believe this will provide a great opportunity for our city to attract prime businesses to our area. The purchase of the land today will reap many benefits for our community in the years to come. 5. We recommend that the city appoint a liaison to attend the MNDOT bridge crossing meetings. This addition of a new bridge across the Mississippi will have a tremendous effect on our community. These recommendations are respectfully submitted by the IDC. • c 7 ~R~' ~g~ S~ . "~ ~~ ~ "Che Monticello hldustrial Development Committee would like to submit the following recommendations for goals/projects within the Community Vision framework. First and foremost, our mission is to maintain and increase the industrial tax base and Co create jobs in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. We realize the economy has slowed industrial development. Yet we believe in the very near firture, Monticello will become a prime industrial area and we want to be able to supply the fiiture land needs. ~eCOnlmenClatlO[1S: 1. We would like to see the planning/zoning commission, as well as city council, preserving as much industrial land as possible. We recognize that often developers drive projects and may have their own visions. However, we recommend that all cun-ent industrial sites remain zoned as industrial or I-IA. Changing the zoning to a P.U.D or commercial development erodes tl;e limited industrial land we currently ~' have available. ~~rr~ ~_ C,~ ~. Establish a task force for implementation of the comp plan. We recommend using ~ people ol~tside of city hall to-do the research. This mz~ nr may not provide a different ~e~n~-~~+9' ~' perspective for tl~-eennmunity. ~.~-ed~e~- 3. Once long term planning has been adopted, keep to these plans. This will be our best .~~„ avenue for shaping the community. ~..0-~..9~ ~-+- "~ `'^P `~~"og, 4. The IDC has long been a proponent of purchasing land for a city owned industrial ~" park. We believe this will provide a great opportunity for our city to attract prime businesses to our area. The purchase of the land toda ill reap many benef s for our community in the ears to come ~ '~ ~ Q~-~ -~ y . T .. - 5. We recommend that the city appoint a liaison to attend the MNDOT bridge crossing meetings. This addition of a nevv bridge across the Mississippi will have a tremendous effect on our community. These recommendations are respectfully submitted by the IDC. c~.~ c~'~ 'Cry` \ - . 9.~~ ~i~i~`b v ~( ~y9~ ~ I'C r~ ` " `''~' ~~~ ~~ "~ ~~~