IDC Agenda 10-19-2000•
IDC MEETING
Thursday, October 19, 2000, 7:00 a.m.
City Hall, 505 Walnut Street
with special invitation to
~1
U
Council Member Clint Herbst
Rick Wolfsteller
Jeff O'Neill
John Simola
Fred Patch
1
• AGENDA
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Thursday, October 19, 2000 - 7:00 a.m.
City Hall - 505 Walnut Street -Academy Room
MEMBERS: Chair Tom Ollig, Vice Chair Kevin Doty, Don Smith, Tom Lindquist, Bill Tapper, Dick
Van Allen, Bob Mosford, Don Roberts, Mike Benedetto, Dan Carlson, and Jim
Amundson.
COUNCIL: Mayor Roger Belsaas and Council Member Clint Herbst.
STAFF: Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, John Simola, Fred Patch, and Ollie Koropchak.
Call to Order and Welcome.
2. Consideration to approve the September 21, 2000 IDC minutes.
3. Consideration of updates:
a) Mayor Belsaas -Mayor's report
b) Koropchak -Prospect and BRE
c) Smith, Ollig, or Van Allen -Marketing (Follow-up of IDC Banquet)
4. Continued -Follow-up discussion to the September IDC meeting relative to city engineer
consultant and public relations.
5. Consideration to review approved 2001 water rates and WAC fees and to discuss a proposed
trunk water charge increase. (John Simola)
6. Follow-up on the recruitment of Barb Schweintek as an IDC member and award of Johnson's
appreciation plaque.
7. Continued -Consideration of an update on the progress to actively pursue acquisition of land for
future industrial use.
a) Draft copy of Swap Agreement between City and Chadwick parcel.
8. Other Business.
9. Adjournment. Next IDC meeting, Thursday, November 16, 2000.
1
MINUTES
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Thursday September 21, 2000 - 7:00 a.m.
TDS TELECOM - 316 Pine Street
MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom Ollig, Kevin Doty, Don Smith, Tom Lindquist, Bill
Tapper, Dick Van Allen, Bob Mosford, Don Roberts,
Mike Benedetto, Mayor Belsaas
MEMBERS ABSENT: Dan Carlson, Jim Amundson, Rick Wolfsteller
1. Call to Order:
Chair Tom Ollig called the meeting to order at 7:15 a.m.
2. Consideration to approve the July 20, 2000 and August 17, 2000 minutes:
Motion by Kevin Doty seconded by Mike Benedeto to approve minutes as written.
Motion approved.
3. Consideration of Updates:
Mayor Belsaas reported on the Chadwick parcel in that there is not as much gravel to
mine as thought originally. The swap of property between the land owners and the
City is somewhat on hold and the City is expecting a new proposal from the
• Chadwick owners. The Mayor noted that the Gold Nugget litigation is moving
forward and the there may be some resolution before year end.
Don Smith reported from the Marketing Committee on the IDC Banquet September
26th. To date there are over 100 attendees, he is extremely pleased with the progress
and interest the new location and format have generated. Mayor Colman is not
charging a speaking fee. Don commended Susie from the Chamber for her work and
the professionalism of the invitations. Don was directed to contact Susie at the
Chamber about name tags for the IDC members to ware at the banquet.
The BRE report from Ollie was unavailable and will be reported at our October
meeting.
4. Follow-up discussion from the August meeting relative to the city engineer contracts,
fees and process.
Much open discussion was directed towards the Mayor regarding the concerns IDC
members have about the process, and public relations involving the City Staff and
engineering firm towards developers coming to Monticello. Several instances were
cited where developers of new projects or expansions of existing facilities have
expressed a sense of great frustration in working with the City Staff and engineering
firm. After a very frank exchange of ideas the IDC Chair was directed to invite to our
October meeting Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, Frcd Patch, John Sinlola and Clillt
Herbst to continue this discussion. A letter from the IDC will be sent to each inviting
them to the October meeting.
5. Consideration of accepting the resignation of Shelly Johnson as a member of the IDC
and consideration of replacement.
Motion by Mike Benedetto seconded by Tom Lindquist to accept Shelly's
resignation. After some discussion the IDC Chair was directed to speak with Barb
Schwientek the Monticello/Big Lake Community Hospital Administrator inviting her
to join the IDC. In the event she declines the invitation her council is to be sought to
try and find a replacement.
It was also directed that because Shelly was a Charter Member of the IDC a plaque
expressing our appreciation to him for his years of work be purchased and presented.
It was also noted that at the IDC Banquet there should also be some recognition.
6. There being no further business it was motioned by Kevin Doty seconded by Tom
Lindquest to adjourn the meeting.
After the meeting a tour of the TDS TELECOM facilities was given to the members.
7. Next IDC meeting, October 19, 2000.
•
Ollie Koropchak
From: Heidi Peper WHE, Econ Dev Partnership [hpeper@whe.org]
~ent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 9:44 AM
o: 'Ollie Koropchak'
Subject: board spot
Hi Ollie -sorry my earlie message didn't make it ... The management
committee of the Partnership met to discuss board seats that are or will be
vacant at the end of this year. One of those spots needs representation from
a WC city. It was unanimous that we should offer that seat to you and change
our meeting dates so that you would be able to attend board meetings. If you
accept our offer to serve on our board of directors, we would change our
meeting time to 8 am on the 4th Thursday of the month. Please let me know if
you accept our offer. Thanks.
Heidi Peper
Executive Director
EDP of Wright County
763-477-3086
hpeper@whe.org
•
•
3 ~)
~ur~c~a~, November 2, 2000
.J
4
_`
ti ~
b
~.
`' r
v
w
•~.,:
~n
.~
~~~...
`;
M
"..,,r
~~
~~~4oP,ye
0
~ ~
0 1/
~NR~R~
Registration, 7:00 to 9:00 a,m,
Opening Session
Governor Jesse Ventura
Minnesota: World Competitor 9:00 a.m,
"Minnesota: World Competitor, a Leader Among States
and Nations" is one of the four major strategies of Governor
Venture's Big Plan. After launching the Big Plan last year,
Governor Ventura has worked diligently to communicate the
importance of making Minnesota a winner in the global
marketplace. Governor Ventura will present his vision for a
strong economic future for the State and how economic
development and community leaders can be effective
contributors to this vital initiative.
Exhibits, Noon to 6 p,m.
Concurrent Workshops 10:00-11:30 a.m.
EDAM Committee Meeting
The Basic Tools
of Economic Development
Experts in the industry share their knowledge of the five basic
tools in economic development: Business Subsidy Law, Tax
Increment, Tax Abatement, Housing, Industrial Revenue
Bonds, and Minnesota Investment Fund. Great for those new to
economic development or those wanting a quick refresher in
the basics.
Sid Inman
Ehlers & Associates
Paul Steinman.
Springsted Inc., Public Finance Advisors
Workforce Development
for Economic Developers
Workforce Development professionals will describe workforce
development systems tools and the resources that are available to
make economic development professionals more effective in their
business recruitment and busn~ess expansion efforts.
Craig Waldron
City of Oakdale
Qw~~`~PMFti\
5f~i .~tnnuu[
cn~e~otc,L
\O~F E R E'~G/
Smart Growth
The discussion will focus on the practical application of Smart
Gowth principles in Minnesota. The discussion will outline how
Smart Growth projects have been fmanced, who the partners are
and what the outcomes of these projects have been. Observations
on the current status of Smart Growth in Minnesota and where it
may be heading will be offered as well.
Louie Jambois
Department of Trade and Economic Development
Luncheon 11:30 a,m, to 12:30 p,m.
General Session 1:30 to 3:30 p,m,
Governor Ventura launched his Big Plan to focus his
administration on the broad goals he wanted to achieve.
"Minnesota as a World Competitor" will describe the
primary initiatives, including:
- tap the world's interest to the benefit
of their community or company,
compete anywhere in the world with
agricultural products,
- develop a workforce for tomorrow,
- create the best climate to grow business,
use telecommunications for economic development,
- commercialize new technologies,
- benefit from Minnesota tourism efforts, and
- improve the competitive position
of rural Minnesota,
Reception with General Session Question
and Answer Opportunity 3;3p to 5:30 p.m.
Opportunity for conference attendees to ask commissioners
(or their representatives] questions in follow up tothe general
session. The settingwill be informal with refreshments available.
Each topic will have a designated area that people can visit to ask
questions of the cornnussioners. (Topics: Trade, Best Climate to
Grow Business, Conumeteialization of 'New Technologies,
Telecomnlunicadons, Agrictdture_ Tuiu i,~m, apd Developing the
workforce for Tomonot,~)
3z~
~~~
l~ovember 3, 240Q
Registration, 7:30 to 9:00 a.m.
Exhibits, 7:30 a.m, to 3:30 p.m,
Concurrent Workshops, 9:00 to 10:15 a.m.
Bringing Metro Growth to Rural Minnesota
As Minnesota's economy continues its phenomenal growth,
metro-based companies are looking at every option to meet
the demands of a continually -expanding economy. One of
those options is an expansion into locations outside the Twin
Cities. This approach fits perfectly with the new statewide
goal of achieving better diversity in rural Minnesota. Hear
from several companies that have successfully made the
transition to an additional location -and hear what they need
from community and economic developers to create this
win-win situation for companies and greater Minnesota cities.
Doug Swenson
ADC Telecommunications
Steve Haron
'''win City Die Casting
~ay Ellers
Twin City Die Casting
Oscar Carlson
American Spirit. Graphics
Maximizing Community
and Economic Opportunrtles
through 7eiecommunicatlons
Learn about the increasingly essential .link between the
availability o€ advanced telecommunications and successful
communityand economic development efforts. Case studies
will highlight the Southwest TNT project and Kandilink, a
business with heavy reliance on telecommunications, and
Ely's partnership with regional organizations to fund a fiber
connection, which resulted in attracting a major call center to
the community.
Steve Roe
Kandilink
Bill Henning
City of Ely Economic Development
,Bill Coleman
nmmunity Technology Advisor`
Duane Northagen
Iron Range Economic Alliance
oti~~~~PMFti\
J~fh ~nnua[
L,f2f2e~ Q ~~
~Q~F E R EEG/
Regional Promotion
& Networking opportunities
Learn about a few of the regional economic development
partnerships that have focused on opportunities: that are
mutually beneficial to their respective members.' Projects
ranging from cooperative advertising partnerships to the
creation of a regional legislative agenda have expanded the
impact that member organizations could not have
accomplished individually.
Pam Bishop
Economic Partners for Southeast Minnesota
David Piggott
Metro East Development Partnership
Economic Development and Workforce
Councils - A Partnership that Works
Learn. what economic development and workforce councils
have in common and what tools each organization brings to
the table. Learn Grout successful projects, utilizing the
partnership between the Workforce Council, Technical
College, Economic Development Agency, and the company
Kathy Zavala
.Stearns-Benton Employment and Training Council
Jeff Schlingman
St. Cloud Area Economic Development Partnership.
Jane Carter
South Central Technical College
Gail Dodson
Crysteel Manufacturing
Break 10:15 to 14:30 a.m.
Friday continued on page 4 ~.~~`°P'"Fti
o r
;~ ,.
oNr`F`
`'i
~~
•
•
v
x Z .~
~ a
~
a
~
~
y -~
y
' ~ `~ a
~
~
~ 3 ~
~ ~
E v ~
o ~ v
~ W ,y b 0. ~
v 3 ~ ~
= E c
T1 C C 'n v
U
1~1/
_ V A O
2 ~ ,
pA U
~. G ..O U C rti Q ~-~ U ~..~
w' 3 .ro ~ o ~ ~ ~ ro ~ u- cJ
~
!~1 ~p ~
-ti o 'U~'
a~
`' is ~
~ a
o O
~,~
~ j. a ~ . C
0 3
.~ ~
~ ,~
~
a cn
E F.
~ a ~
~ a,
c
O ~ ~
_
o ~
~ ~ ~ ro ~ u > ~
~ c
y N
'
_~
b
~ ~
0.
C
~
rts C r y
'
u
_
~
'TJ -O
~~•V
a~
~ v
U v
X
C ' GA
v
t^ rtt O 7
m ~~ -~, O
~
Q = .
~ v C
H C ~ w
O
%
Q < L.
f~-. = b
A
M
O
~ D
~ ~
~
~ p
n 3
v, '~
A ~ o
.~., ~
H
3 }~
•
C
t
~~~
• CURRENT NEW RATES
RATES (Effective 1/1/2001)
Trunk Water Charge: $ 950 per acre Being Reviewed
Water Rates, 1998: 0 - 500 cu ft $ 7.50 $ 8.25
over 500 $ 0.45 per 100 cu ft $ 0.50
Water Shut Off, Then Turned On: $ 20 + delinquency No Change
Water Connection Permit: $ 50 No Change
Water Access Charge: 1" line $ 525 + materials $ 625 + materials
1 '/4" $ 775 + materials $ 922 + materials
1 ~~" $ 950 + materials $1,131 + materials
2'~ $1,200 + materials
$ l ,428 + materials
3" $1,550 + materials
$1,845 + materials
4" $2,050 + materials
$2,440 + materials
6" $2,575 + materials
$3,064 + materials
8" $3,425 + materials
$4,076 + materials
Water Main Tapping -New Services:
" $ 200 each + materials No Change
(1
only)
Water Availability Charge $ 12/year $ 24/year
(for those who have city water (billed in July)
available but choose not to hook up)
S~
Cash Flow Analysis
Water Trunk Fee
City of Monticello
WSB Project No. 1010.97
Beginning Balance
Annual House
Hook up Fees
Annual Acres
Proposed Trunk Fee
Annual Fee Multiplier
$o
101
$500 per house
60
$905 per acre
4.00%
Water Trunk Fund Annual
Year Description Expenditures i Debt Service Trunk Main i Hook Up Fee 's Trunk Fee 's Balance Debt Transfer
Beginning Balance $0 $0
1999 $0 $40,000: $50,500: $54,300 ~ $64,800 $0
2000 Well and Pumphouse $515,000 $50,000 $41,600 $52,520 $56,472 $82,192 $0
2001 10 year bond @ 6% $63,194 $43,264 $54,621: $58,731 $89,086 $0
2002 And $100K Cash $63,194 $44,995: $56,806: $61,080 $98,784 $0
2003 $63,194 ~ $46,794 $59,078 ~ $63,523 $111,397 $0
2004 Water Tower $2,086,693 ~ $63,194 € $48,666 ~ $61,441 $66,064 ~ $127,043 $0
2005 10 year bond @ 6% $346,775: $50,613: $63,899: $68,707 ($137,740) ($137,740)
2006 $346,775 $52,637 $66,455: $71,455 € ($399,242) ($261,503)
2007 $346,775 $54,743 $69,113 $74,313 ($657,334) ($258,092)
2008 $346,775 $56,932 `•. $71,877: $77,286: ($911,879) ($254,545)
2009 $346,775 $59,210: $74,752: $80,377: ($1,162,734) ($250,855)
2010 Well and Pumphouse $553,694: $346,775 ~ $61,578 € $77,742: $83,592: ($1,409,753) ($247,019)
10 year bond @ 6% $358,829: $64,041 $80,852 $86,936 {$1,664,834) ($255,082)
$358,829 $66,603 $84,086: $90,413: ($1,915,766) ($250,932)
2 $358,829 $69,267: $87,450: $94,030 ($2,162,382) ($246,616)
2014 $358,829 ~ $72,038: $90,948: $97,791 ': ($2,404,509) ($242,127)
2015 $75,247: $74,919 ' $94,586 $101,703 '•. ($2,358,387) $46,122
2016 $75,247: $77,916: $98,369 $105,771 ': ($2,307,410) $50,977
2017 $75,7_47: $81,033: $102,304: $110,002 ($2,251,384) $56,026
2018 $75,247: $84,274: $106,396 ~ $114,402 ($2,190,107) $61,277
2019 $75,247 ' $87,645 ` $110,652 $118,978 ($2,123,370) $66,738
2020 Well and Pumphouse $744,118 € $75,247 $91,151: $115,078 i $123,737 i ($2,050,952) $72,417
2021 10 year bond @ 6% $101,126: $94,797: $119,681: $128,687: ($1,998,507) $52,445
2022 $101,126: $98,589 $124,468: $133,834 ? ($1,939,919) $58,588
2023 $101,126: $102,532: $129,447: $139,187 ($1,874,943) $64,976
2024 $101,126: $106,633 `:. $134,625 $144,755 ($1,803,322) $71,621
2025 $101,126 $110,899 $140,010 $150,545 ($1,724,792) $78,530
2026 $101,126 $115,335: $145,610: $156,567 i ($1,639,075) $85,717
2027 $101,126 ' $119,948: $151,435 [ $162,830: ($1,545,885) $93,190
2028 $101,126: $124,746: $157,492 i $169,343 ' ($1,444,922) $100,963
2029 Well and Pumphouse $970,905: $101,126: $129,736: $163,792: $176,116: ($1,335,875) $109,047
2030 10 year bond @ 6% $233,072: $134,925: $170,343 $183,161 ($1,350,368) ($14,493)
2031 $131,946 $140,322: $177,157 ': $190,488 ($1,254,992) $95,376
2032 $131,946: $145,935 ' $184,243: $198,107 € ($1,150,522) $104,469
2033 $131,946 ~ $151,773 € $191,613 i $206,031: ($1,036,597) $113,926
2034 $131,946 $157,844 $199,277 $214,273: ($912,836) $123,761
2035 $131,946: $164,157 $207,249: $222,844: ($778,847) $133,989
2036 $131,946 $170,724 $215,539 $231,757 ($634,221) $144,626
2037 $131,946: $177,553 ' $224,160: $241,028 ($478,532) $155,689
2038 $131,946 € $184,655: $233,126 ~ $250,669: ($311,337) $167,195
2039 Well and Pumphouse $1,304,815 $131,946: $192,041 ~ $242,452 $260,695 ($132,177) $179,160
2040 10 year bond @ 6% $177,324 [ $199,722 € $252,150 `•. $271,123: $14,049 $132,177
:7
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WATER RATE SURVEY
2000
r
h
•
RESIDENTIAL 5/8"
(199G) WATER ' ' WAG 'METER
CITY POPULATIQN RATES _ Fl~.~ ' FEE::
BECKER 1,284 $4.25 sere. chg. $600.00 $225.00
$1.04/1,000 gal.
BIG LAKE 3,637 NON RESPONSIVE NON RESPONSIVE NON
RESPONSIVE
BUFFALO 7,722 $2.35/1,000 gal. $750.00 $76.00
(for the first 100,000 gallons)
$2.15/1,000 gal. thereafter
*minimum $20.00
DELANO 2,945 $6.45/1st 3,000 gal. $2,200.00 $145.00
$2.15/1,000 gal. thereafter
ELK RIVER 12,811 $4.44 serv. chg. $300.00 $66.00
$1.11/1,000 gal. + $1,050.00 conn. fee
MAPLE GROVE 43,542 $9.00/ 0 - 10,000 gallons $1,300 $110.00
$0.90/1,000 gal. thereafter
MONTICELLO 5,527 $7.5010 - 500 cu. ft. $525.00 $108.05
OR $7.50/ 0 - 3,750 GAL.
$0.451100 cu. ft. thereafter
OR $0.60/1,000 GAL. THEREAFTER
PLYMOUTH 57,391 $0.70/1,000 gal. $630.00 $131.00
(for 0 - 12,500 gallons)
$0.80/1,000 gal.
(for 12,501 - 35,000 gallons)
$1.50/1,000 gal.
(for over 35,000 gallons)
ST. BONIFACIUS 1,192 $8.25/first 5,000 gal. $650.00 $225.00
$2.50/1,000 gal. thereafter
WAITE PARK 5,476 $1.20/1,000 gal. $500.00 $182.50
(for first 10,000 gallons)
$1.50/1,000 gal. therafter
U
COUNCIL UPDATE
Council Agenda - 10/09/2000
Interceptor Sewer Project through the Bondhus Property between CSAH 7~ and I-9~t
The City Engineer and City staff have been working with Mr. Bondhus to acquire the necessary
easement to construct the trunk sanitary sewer from CSAI-I 75 through the Bondhus property to the
south side of the Burlington Northern Railroad. NIr. Bondhus was opposed to the project moving
ahead as he felt it was not necessary at this time. I-Ie also felt that the Monticello School District did
not feel any urgency in completing the pond to act as a biology or nature center. We did receive
word from the school district through Mike Benedetto that the board were not in any hurry to have
the pond constructed. Consequently, we are making plans at this time to have the existing
excavation filled and the area dressed up and re-seeded. This project, as well as the overall project
serving the future proposed industrial park on the Chadwick property. was a topic of discussion at
the last industrial development committee meeting. City staff laid out ultimate plans for the new
trunk line crossing I-9~4 and servin~~ the southeastern portiun of the comnuulity, as well as the new
industrial park area and acting as a reliever for the trunk sanitary sealer at Washington Street and the
Burlington Northern Railroad. The consensus at tl7e (ndustrial Development Committee iVleeting,
Whlcll WSS attended bV ,101111 B0nC1hLiS, W1S that the aClUal prO~ect COLIId wait bLit t11~1t file Clt\' SIlOUId
move forward in completing file plal7S a17d Obtalilm`~ the ease171entS hilt Walt 017 Installation ulltll the
need is eminent. Mr. Bondhus did not appear to have a problem with the sug~~estions from the
Industrial Development Committee to obtain easements and have the plans drawn as lone as the
installation was not ~~oin~z forward. Consequently. that is our current plan, that the CiCv Engineer
will draft plans and determine the size of the easements and we will make every attempt to obtain
those easements but the actual construction will wait until the need is eminent [f anv of the Council
has a problem with us proceeding under this scenario please petition the item to the agenda and eve
can discuss it at the meeting. otherwise, we will proceed as proposed.
By: John E. Simola
Public Works Director
~i
OCT-18-2000 10 38
~y~B
& Associates, Inc.
October 18, 2000
Mr. Jeff O'Neill
WSB 8 ASSOCIATES INC.
8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350
Minneapolis, MN 55426
tel: 763-541-4800
fax: 763-541-1700
Deputy City Administrator/Community Development Director
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Avenue, Suite 1
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Re: Preparation of Standard Specifications and Design Standards Manual
WSB Project No. l I60-381
Dear Mr. O'Neill:
7635411700 P.01i02
B.A. Mittelsceadt. P.E
Btet A. Weise, P.E.
Peter R willenbcing, Y.B.
Donald W, Sterna, P E.
Ronald B. Bray, P.E.
I am writing this letter as a response to our recent discussions about the preparation of a Standard
Specification and Design Standards Manual in an effort to streamline the development process
within the City of Monticello. The development of these two manuals should eliminate the
confusion related to the expectations of the City design standards. A brief description of each of
these documents aze described as follows:
Standard Specifuation -- The standard specification is intended to be used for all
improvement type projects that would involve the extension of utilities and street
construction. This specification would include standard bidding documents, contracts,
general conditions, detail plates, and construction standards. This document would be
updated on a yearly basis and would be distributed to companies doing business within the
City ofMonticello, and could be purchased by Contractors working in the City of Monticello
for a nominal cost. Private engineers could simply write supplemental specifications to the
general specification. The City can be more comfortable that our specifications and
standazds are incorporated. This would also reduce the review time from an engineering
standpoint. A draft copy of the specification will be provided for your review and comment
by November 1. We have provided draft details to John Simola for his review. We would
intend to utilize this document starting with the 2001 construction season.
• Design Standards Manual -- This manual is intended to be used by all engineers and
planners working in the City of Monticello on private development work and site plan
preparation. The manual will explain our trunk fee programs, design guidelines and other
specific design related information. This guide will also include all standard detail plates and
other City specific information. This guide is not intended to replace standard ordinances;
however, it should summarize the requirements in one Iocation and make it easier for the
• developers to move their projects forward. It is intended that this guide would be available
Minneapolis St. Cloud
1>~finso'trttwe Engrieten Planters F:~wpwtN~tiao-se~toi~ogo.wpa
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
OCT-18-2000 10 39 WSB 8 ASSOCIATES INC. 7635411700 P.02i02
Mr. Jefj~'O'Neill
City of ManticeUo
October l8, 2000
Page 2
for staffreview in early December and would be available for City Council review at their
first meeting in January.
We are hopeful that the preparation of these documents will aid developers in the development of
plans within the City of Monticello. Please provide me with any information you or the rest of the
Monticello staff would like to have included in the Design Guide so it can be incorporated in to the
draft document. We are very excited about the opportunity to develop these documents and are
optimistic that this will prove to be one more step of streamlining the development process within
the City of Monticello.
Please contact me at (763) 277-5790 if you have any questions or comments regazding the
development of these documents.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, InG
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
City Engineer
cc: Rick Wolfsteller, Administrator
John Simola, Public Works Director
Steve Grittman, NAC
bba/jw
Enclosure
•
•
•
Ft\WPWIIVII 16Q38110170ojo.wpd
TOTAL P.02