Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING – PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September 5, 2023 – 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: Chair Paul Konsor, Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Eric Hagen, Melissa Robeck Council Liaison: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items D. Approval of Agenda E. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes—August 1, 2023 • Regular Meeting Minutes – August 1, 2023 • Special Meeting Minutes–August 15, 2023 F. Citizen Comment 2. Public Hearings A. Consideration of a request for Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Great River Second Addition; Consideration of a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a 138 -unit multi -family residential building in the B-3, Highway Business District Applicant: Briggs Companies 3. Regular Agenda N/A 4. Other Business A. Community Development Director's Report S. Adjournment MINUTES REGULAR MEETING – PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 1, 2023 – 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Chair Paul Konsor, Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck Commissioners Absent: Eric Hagen Council Liaison Present: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard, Jim Thares 1. General Business A. Call to Order Planning Commission Chair Paul Konsor called the regular meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Roll Call Mr. Konsor called the roll. C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items None D. Approval of Agenda ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 1, 2023 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. E. Approval of Meeting Minutes •Regular Meeting Minutes—July 5, 2023 ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 5, 2023 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. F. Citizen Comment None 2. Public Hearings A. Consideration of a request for an Amendment to the Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Planned Unit Development District for proposed amendments to the PUD Design Standards Applicant: Tamarack Land City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. Paul Konsor asked for clarification that the applicant had requested changes to the PUD flexibility from the original approval of the second addition, and staff had proposed standards that do not reflect the applicant's requests. Mr. Grittman cC-larified that the applicant is aware of staff's recommendations, but does not know if all recommendations are agreeable to -suitable ferthe applicant. Melissa Robeck asked what the reason for the proposed changes weFe if the development already received approval. Mr. Grittman said that it was likely that the changing housing environment had caused the applicants to -Feaddress these approved standards in an effort to draw more interest in the development. Teri Lehner asked if the applicants knew how many of each home style would be built in the proposed development, or if they had plans to prevent the entire development being built with the smaller home styles that are proposed. Mr. Grittman deferred to the applicants on the question, but did note this portion of the development is roughly 20% of the total Haven Ridge area. Andrew Tapper mentioned that the applicants are requesting areas of flexibility from the zoning ordinance by way of PUD, and asked what types of enhancements for this development will be offered by the development team. Mr. Grittman noted that the development itself can serve as the enhancement, due to the variety of housing styles and level of affordability included, providing an area of the market not necessarily seen in Monticello for some time. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler questioned whether the lack of garage space in the proposed home designs would lead to future requests for detached structures, due to a need for more storage space. Mr. Konsor opened the public hearing portion of the item. Marc Schulte, landowner, addressed the Planning Commission and the public. He noted that the Haven Ridge project is entering its sixth year; and noted that anything other than a recommendation of approval by the Planning Commission could end the project. Mr. Konsor asked what standards recommended by either the applicant or staff are conflicting with this project proceeding. Mr. Schulte noted that the majority of the applicant's requested standards were proposed by Lennar Corporation,wheFeas I+f those standards were approved as proposed+s, the development would have a builder on -board and the development could then proceed yet this year. Mr. Konsor asked the applicant if they could clarify their initial thoughts on the recommendations staff proposed. Brian Theis, Applicant from Tamarack Land Development, addressed the Planning Commission and the public. Tamarack's role for this development is to provide ready -to -build lots for builders to purchase. In this case, Tamarack partnered with Lennar to be the home builder for this portion of the Haven Ridge development. Mr. Theis noted that at the time of the original second addition approval, there was no builder identified and those original standards were approved without any comment from a builder. Lennar has said that the standards approved in 2022 would not allow them to build homes in the second addition. Mr. Theis also noted that the applicant's proposed standards are intended to set minimums for the developments; it is not the development team's intention to only build homes at the minimum standards set. Mr. Theis mentioned that it would be an intention to introduce more diverse housing options with different minimum standards in the future phases of the development. Staff's recommendation for the amendede# minimum setbacks and minimum square footage of homes were acceptablee4ay with the development team. Mr. Theis did mention that the minimum garage requirement of 480 square feet would create a challenge for the builder to accommodate with the home styles presented. Continuing through staff's recommendations as part of Exhibit Z in the agenda, the development team noted they could accommodate the roof pitch and fagade requirements, but had concerns with the requirements regarding a usable front porch or pergola on all homes, as well as the requirement of keeping the front door no further than 6 feet set back from the front of the garage. Finally, Mr. Theis noted the difficulty to get, and substantial cost difference, in requiring 3" caliper trees versus 2.5" caliper trees at time of planting. Josh Metzer, Lennar Corporation, addressed the Planning Commission and the public. Mr. Metzer provided a spreadsheet for everyone attending the meeting, detailing the design specifications for each proposed home style. One of the main intentions of the proposed home styles is to help with the cost of purchasing a home. With Lennar's average home cost Twin Cities metro -wide being $580,000, the proposed smaller footprint homes would range from an estimated $350,000 to $390,000. Councilmember Gabler mentioned housing market trends and accommodating those trends to provide houses that are currently selling was something for the Planning Commission to consider during their discussion. Melissa Robeck asked if the lots would have houses built on them, and then sold to people. Mr. Metzer said that it depends on the type and level of interest that is drawn by the development. Lennar is prepared to market the lots both ways as necessary. In the event that lots are intended to be sold with homes already built on them, Ms. Robeck asked how Lennar decides which home styles go on which lots. Mr. Metzer said that Lennar's marketing team takes part in the decision, and the intention is not to build only one style of home with the same architectural character. The intention would be to offer multiple home options on those lots. Mr. Tapper entertained the idea of limiting the number lots for homes that would not otherwise meet the minimum square footage requirements. Mr. Metzer responded that it would be in the development team's best interest to let the market make the determination of what, and of how many of each, home styles would be built. Mr. Tapper asked if the applicants had an idea of what a good threshold would be to set on the number of smaller home styles allowed in the second addition. Mr. Metzer said that he could not provide a number at this time. Mr. Tapper expressed concerns that if flexibility in house square footage was allowed for this portion of the Haven Ridge development, it could lead to more requests for future phases of the development. Chief Building Official and Zoning Administrator Ron Hackenmueller mentioned that Edmonson Ridge, a recently approved residential development in town, offers smaller sized homes, as well as larger. Of the 20 lots currently developed, none of them include APP Afthe small home designs approved with the development. Additionally, the approvals included a requirement for a minimum of 440 square feet of attached garage space. Mr. Tapper asked if the Edmonson Ridge lots are sold on a "buy for construction" basis. Mr. Hackenmueller stated that beyond the initial model homes built, the remainder of the lots have been sold prior to the homes being built. Mr. Metzer reiterated that it is the development team's intention to provide a variety of home styles that also offer a variety of architectural designs. Mr. Konsor stated that his confusion in the discussion stemmed from mixed messages from the development team and whether the ability to compromise on the provided conditions in Eexhibit Z is feasible. Mr. Konsor restated that he would still be interested in setting limitations on the second addition of the development to only allow a certain amount of those home designs that are short on the finished square feet requirement and attached garage space. Mr. Konsor also emphasized the importance of having larger garages, so homeowners have the space to store things inside, rather than having them in the yard. Community Development Director Angela Schumann mentioned, for the Planning Commission to keep in mind, what the balance of available residential properties is in the City, whether they be for rent or for sale. A long-standing goal of the City is to continue to provide an abundance of housing opportunities to existing residents, as well as new potential residents looking for a new community to establish in. Mr. Metzer and the Planning Commission agreed to go line -by-line through staff's proposed conditions in exhibit Z, to better refine where the confliction remained with those standards. Mr. Konsor said that he did not have any issues with the proposed home styles as outlined in the spreadsheet handed out by Mr. Metzer, or the standards proposed by the applicant for the most part. He reiterated that he would still want some sort of assurance that the entire development will not be filled up with those smaller home designs. Councilmember Gabler noted that as the standards and conditions were refined during the item discussion, a condition could be added to limit the number of certain home styles in the development. Mr. Tapper said that he would be interested in tabling the agenda item, until City staff and the applicant have a closer consensus of what those standards should be. Mr. Metzer noted that tabling the recommendation of the item would not change what Lennar is requesting in regard to the home designs. From his standpoint, the remaining standards to come to an agreement on are conditions "c" and "d" located within Exhibit Z. Mr. Konsor restated his concerns do not fall within the conditions of approval, but rather the number of smaller homes within this portion of the development. He would be interested in setting some limitations to ensure that type of home variety. Mr. Theis said that his original request for an attached garage minimum was 430 square feet and staff countered with a 480 square feet minimum. The plans presented have a minimum attached garage size of 463 square feet, and would have liked to have the standards reflect as such. Teri Lehner asked staff if the City has ever created limitations on types of homes in a given development, and if that is a feasible thing to monitor. Ms. Schumann said she would have to look back to verify, but added that one of the main challenges with that would be having to tell a potential new resident that they could not build the home of their interest, due to a specific quota set by the City. Mr. Grittman added that typically the builders monitor their lot and home inventory in a given development and adding a limitation as such would require the building department to also monitor the development, so certain quotas are not exceeded. Mr. Grittman also mentioned that some cities have set standards where an identical home style could not be built next to each other within the neighborhood, not that it would be a recommendation from Staff, but as a reference for discussion. Mr. Konsor also stated that tabling the recommendation of this item would benefit the decision at hand, so staff and the applicant can work on coming to terms with the development standards. Mr. Theis noted that tabling the recommendation would affect their plans to grade in the late Summer/Fall, as a goal would be to have homes built and ready to showcase in the Spring. Councilmember Gabler asked if there was an option of having a special meeting later in the month of August, so the applicant could still make the standards Council decision time on August 28, 2023. Ms. Schumann clarified that that was a capability, and returned the question of what it was the Planning Commission would be interested in seeing different at that meeting, compared to what was presented. Mr. Metzer reiterated that if the Planning Commission was willing to amend the condition on garage size from 480 square feet to 463 square feet, the applicant's requests would then be satisfied to proceed with the development. Ms. Robeck noted that seemed like a reasonable compromise. Mr. Theis restated that his request was still for Planning Commission to recommend approval of the standards the applicant originally asked for, with that new minimum standard for the attached garages. Mr. Konsor noted a discrepancy in the information provided related to requested minimum square footages of the homes themselves and asked for clarification. Mr. Metzer clarified that the minimums set by the plans provided were 934 finished square footage, and 1,704 finishable square footage. Mr. Tapper believed that there would be no compromise on design standards between City staff, the Planning Commission and the applicant. The applicant had requested design standards that would allow the development to proceed yet this yea r. Mr. Schulte agreed that the standards requested by the applicant were the only standards that would allow the development to proceed with construction as proposed. Ms. Schumann noted that if it would benefit the Planning Commission and their decision-making, it was possible to hold a special meeting within the next two weeks, to allow time to still meet the second City Council meeting in August. Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Councilmember Gabler and Mr. Konsor agreed that holding a special meeting would be beneficial to the Planning Commission. Ms. Lehner agreed and said that a revised list of standards following the night's discussion would provide clarity. Ms. Robeck concurred. Mr. Konsor proposed that at the next meeting, the conditions in Exhibit Z should include a set quota for the smaller home styles presented, that would not meet normal zoning standards. Mr. Konsor used no more than 20% of lots in the second addition can have a "Crosby" or "Emily" style home, as an example. Mr. Tapper preferred up to 50% of the lots, rather than Mr. Konsor's proposed 20%. Mr. Konsor believed allowing 50% as the limit was too high. Ms. Lehner said that if the development team had an idea of what would be a reasonable percentage of lots to allows those smaller home styles at, the Planning Commission would appreciate that information. Mr. Tapper asked for clarification from the body, that if Staff and the applicant can bring back a proposed limit to the smaller home styles to be built in the second addition, the standards originally proposed by the applicant are sufficient. The Planning Commission concurred. Councilmember Gabler asked the Planning Commission if they thought it is in the City's best interest to dictate which style homes can be built, and where in the community, potentially affecting Monticello's efforts to bring in new residents and new homeowners. Ms. Gabler mentioned this could be part of the discussion at that subsequent meeting. Mr. Konsor asked if there are any conflicts with setting a limitation as discussed. Mr. Grittman did not have any uniform examples of a limitation as such being set, but did mention this is a Planned Unit Development, and a standard like that could be implemented. He did not provide an example of what staff would bring back to the Planning Commission for consideration, as that would need to be further discussed. Ms. Schumann clarified that the Planning Commission is fine with the standards requested by the applicant, so long as the applicant can ensure variety in the development, and not have only those three smaller home designs built on all 59 lots. The Planning Commission concurred. Mr. Konsor reopened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Metzer asked for clarification on when the subsequent meeting would be held. Ms. Schumann said that the meeting could be held on August 8th, 2023 or August 15th 2023, and still be ready to proceed with the City Council at their August 28th meeting. Mr. Schulte noted that tabling action on the item at hand would affect their plan to close on the property within the week. Councilmember Gabler asked if closing on the property prior to receiving official approval by the City Council was the applicant's intention. Mr. Theis said that if the Planning Commission recommended approval, they would proceed with closing on the property and potentially begin grading the site, prior to City Council approval. Mr. Theis reiterated that establishing a threshold on home styles built in the development makes it difficult for not only the development team, but also the potential homebuyers. Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO TABLE ACTION ON THE AGENDA ITEM UNTIL AUGUST 15, 2023 AT 6:00 P.M. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Teri Lehner left at 8:23 p.m., leaving three voting members to carry out the remainder of the agenda. B. Consideration of a reauest for an Amendment to the Monticello Zonine Ordinance related to commercial animal kennels as a principal use, including Use Table, Use Specific Standards and Definitions Applicant: City of Monticello Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. Following some inquiries from community members on the capabilities of bringing an animal kennel facility to Monticello, City staff drafted an ordinance to allow the use within specific zoning districts. The purpose of the proposed use was to allow day care, boarding, and training services for household pets as a principal use in specific commercial and industrial districts. Councilmember Gabler asked if someone wanted to operate a pet grooming business out of their home, would they be considered under the personal service definition or would it be a home occupation. Ms. Schumann clarified that the home occupation would take precedent, and depending on the level of home occupation, the person operating would potentially need a conditional use permit for said home occupation. Mr. Konsor asked if this applies to neighbors assisting each other for short-term animal care during a vacation. Ms. Schumann clarified that it relies more on whether these services are being publicly advertised as commercial business. The City does not intend to monitor their neighbors caring for animals in a short-term, non-public sense. Mr. Tapper asked if a dog is dropped off at an establishment specifically for grooming purposes, and ends up being there all day, is that considered boarding. Ms. Schumann clarified that it would not be considered boarding under the proposed ordinance. Mr. Konsor asked if kennels are already defined within the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Schumann confirmed and added that the current definition only allows it to be in the agriculture -open space district within the City. Mr. Konsor opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. John Gallagher, 404 Underwood Lane, St. Michael, MN, 55376, addressed the Planning Commission. Mr. Gallagher said he attended the public hearing to observe, as he is interested in potentially bringing this use to Monticello. Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED TO COMMERCIAL ANIMAL KENNELS AS A PRINCIPAL USE, INCLUDING USE TABLE, USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS AND DEFINITIONS, BASED ON FINDINGS IN RESOLUTION PC -2023-23. MELISSA ROBECK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. C. Consideration of a request for an Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance related to a correction to the approved language within Ordinance No. 799 as related to R-1, Single -Family Residential District Applicant: City of Monticello Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item. A corrective item, the intent of the agenda item is to correct language for the size of garages in the R-1 Single -Family Residential District in a previous ordinance adopted by the City Council. The corrective ordinance would revise adopted language to match the original intention of the Zoning Ordinance section. Mr. Konsor opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. ANDREW MOVED RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN RESOLUTION PC -2023-24. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. 3. Regular Agenda A. Economic Develooment Toolbox Uodate Economic Development Manager Jim Thares provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. At the meeting, Mr. Thares provided a document listing the assistance opportunities at the local, state, and federal level for businesses in Monticello to utilize as necessary. 4. Other Business A. Community Development Director's Report Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. 5. Adjournment ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. MELISSA ROBECK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:15 P.M. MINUTES JOINT MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Tuesday, August 1, 2023 — 4:45 p.m. Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Chair Paul Konsor, Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner Commissioners Absent: Eric Hagen, Melissa Robeck Councilmembers Present: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz Councilmembers Absent: Lee Martie, Sam Murdoff Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Rachel Leonard, Ron Hackenmueller, Jim Thares, Hayden Stensgard 1. Call to Order Planning Commission Chair Paul Konsor called the joint workshop meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission and City Council at 4:45 p.m. with quorum of both bodies present. 2. Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Proposal Submittal for a Multi -Commercial Project in the B-2 Limited Business District at the Intersection of Chelsea Road and Fenning Ave (Applicant: Division 25, LLC.) Northwest Corner of Fenning Ave. NE and Chelsea Rd., PIDs: 155-011-000171, 155-011-000111 Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview for the purpose of the joint concept meeting. It was mentioned that Concept Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) review is not a formal application. Concept Stage review provides applicants an opportunity to bring a development proposal forward to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and comment, without requiring a formal decision on the proposal. City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission, City Council, and the public. The multi-user commercial development is proposed at the northwest corner of Fenning Avenue and Chelsea Road, adjacent to Interstate 94. The potential first phase of the development totals 9.87 acres, creating eight lots for development within that area. Those eight lots are anticipated to be used by quick service restaurants including coffee, auto services, and a tunnel car wash facility. The primary reason for the PUD zoning proposal is due to the 3 parcels adjacent to Interstate 94 in the plan not having direct access to a public street. Dave Carland and Randy Rauwerdink of Venture Pass Partners, LLC., on behalf of the applicant, provided a brief presentation on the concept proposal to the Planning Commission, City Council, and the public. Mayor Hilgart asked if most of the potential users will be secured by the time the proposal comes back to the City for the formal land use process. Mr. Carland confirmed, and Mr. Rauwerdink added that it will be necessary to have those users secured for platting purposes. Mr. Rauwerdink also mentioned that the development team is in the process of completing a traffic study in the area related to the potential development that is anticipated to be completed in September. Mr. Konsor noted that this was a good site for the potential development and thought the information from the traffic study would be beneficial to proceeding in the land use process. Mayor Hilgart asked if there were any comments within the staff memo provided that the development team had concerns about. Mr. Carland said they did not see any comments that were concerning. Councilmember Tracy Hinz asked if the developers see any obstacles related to the potential development. Mr. Carland said that interest rates and construction costs are the most apparent challenges for development at the moment. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler asked if this concept was considered in any surrounding cities. Mr. Carland said that deciding the location of a commercial development as such is mainly derived from where the larger potential tenants are interested in being located. Councilmember Gabler asked City staff if the potential development will require the City to address the reconstruction of Fallon Avenue earlier than anticipated. Ms. Schumann said that reconstruction Fallon Avenue would not be necessary for this potential development. Andrew Tapper asked if there is any plan to have cohesive architectural design throughout the development. Mr. Rauwerdink said that there is an expectation that building material calculations for the buildings would be consistent with one another, but it is expected that the businesses maintain their brand identity. Mr. Tapper asked where the proposed pylon sign would go, and how many are expected to be within this development. Mr. Rauwerdink said that the main pylon sign for the first phase of development would be along Fenning Avenue, and it would be considered at a future time whether an additional pylon sign would be necessary for future phases. The remainder of the signage on site would be wall signs on buildings, as well as monument signs consistent with the City's zoning ordinance. Mr. Tapper expressed concern that the users will want the largest monument signs allowed by code at each location and that it would be unnecessary to have such. Mr. Carland said that that is something the development team will continue to review as the development proceeds. M. Rauwerdink noted as well that a comprehensive sign plan for the area is a requirement of the Development Stage PUD process, so it will be addressed at that time. Councilmember Hinz liked the effort to have a large amount of greenspace within the development, and emphasized the importance of the area being pedestrian friendly. Mr. Rauwerdink referenced the plans and that they incorporate an internal sidewalk throughout the development area. Councilmember Gabler expressed interest in incorporating trees throughout the development as well as parking lot islands to break up the larger parking areas. Councilmember Gabler also entertained the idea of having a "Welcome to Monticello" sign out towards Interstate 94. 3. Adjournment By two -body consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 5:44 p.m. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 15, 2023 — 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Chair Paul Konsor, Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck Commissioners Absent: Eric Hagen Council Liaison Present: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard 1. General Business A. Call to Order Planning Commission Chair Paul Konsor called the special meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Roll Call Mr. Konsor called the roll. C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items None D. Approval of Agenda ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 15, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. E. Citizen Comment None 2. Public Hearings N/A 3. Regular Agenda A. Tabled - Consideration of a request for an Amendment to the Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Planned Unit Development District for proposed amendments to the PUD Design Standards Applicant: Tamarack Land Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided a brief recap of the August 1 Planning Commission regular meeting, where the original item was tabled, then presented the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. The Planning Commission moved to table action on this item previously, due to their interest in ensuring a variety of establishing a maximum numbeF "{+"^ home designs in the 2nd Addition that exceed^mss" the minimum requirements as proposed by the applicant. Ms. Schumann indicated that since the time of the August 1 meeting, tThe applicant has and staff provided additional information to ensure variety in home designs would be a priority, without having to establish a quota or threshold of sorts. Ms. Schumann reviewed the strategies proposed by the applicant, including anti -monotony code, lots reserved for homes meeting the minimums, and facade elevation variety. Staff recommended approval of the request, subject to the revised conditions identified in Exhibit Z. Revisions to the conditions in Exhibit Z presented for approval were amended of the staff epeFt were derived from the original discussion between the Planning Commission and the applicant at the August 1 regular meeting. Mr. Konsor asked about the original conditions of approval presented on August 1, and if Staff's position on the conditions remained the same or changed. Ms. Schumann clarified that the conditions had been revised based on the August 1 regular meeting discussion and clarify the applicant's request and staff's recommendation. Mr. Konsor asked for clarification on the anti -monotony provisions proposed by the applicant for the vaFiety+R proposed home design elevations f^' the pFepesed heme designs. Ms. Schumann said that each laye t ^f the home plan -s provided includes variations to those home facades, whereas the plan layout of the home would be the same. The,"he design of the homes' facade, such as placement of garage, windows and entry door can vary from one other. Within the variations described above, there is also variation to the fagade's treatment, such as siding, roofing, and other finishing materials including color. Mr. Konsor asked how strictly the anti -monotony plan described in the agenda item is followed. Ms. Schumann deferred to the applicant to answer the question as that is a standard applied by the builder. Mr. Konsor asked if something like that could be included within the conditions of Exhibit Z, to ensure this standard is followed by the builder. Ms. Schumann noted that Planning Commission has the ability to include a condition related to that as part of the decision at hand. Ron Hackenmueller, Chief Building Official & Zoning Administrator, added that the building department has done something similar before, and can manage monitoring something as such, but believed that the builder would stress the anti -monotony program they implement to provide variety in what they have to offer. Teri Lehner noted that she did not have a problem with the proposed amendments and revised conditions of approval. Also, the fact that staff has not historically had precedents set by a development being overwhelmingly filled with smaller home styles, when given the option, made the potential quota condition unnecessary. Melissa Robeck added that the additional home styles provided by the applicant will further help with the variation of home styles in the neighborhood. Andrew Tapper noted that precedents may not have been set on prior developments, due to the builder of the developments. This proposed development is introducing a new, national builder that Monticello has not seen before. Mr. Tapper asked for clarification on why there were 10 lots identified in the agenda that would not have smaller home designs built on them. Ms. Schumann said that the applicant has identified those specific lots due to the grading and configuration of the lots. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler asked what were to happen if a new home design were to be added to the provided designs for the development. Ms. Schumann said that the conditions established as part of the approval allow for new home designs to be included in the development, provided they meet the standards established by this proposed amendment. Paul Konsor asked for clarification on why Staff's recommendation is to not establish home design maximums in the development and if it was related to Staff's inability to monitor the development in that regard. Ms. Schumann clarified that Staff's recommendation was not based on their inability to regulate the development, but rather the strategies proposed for ensuring a variety of homes plans within the development, as well as that design minimums have often been exceeded within -a-, such, but „ the lladk „f histarieal r edeRtS fee Why +ht,'*Mot tie. s aFe ^S+ahGSh.,.J iR the first p ,, ^. Monticello's has REA r e d the PA -t ,RtgaI aRy etheFrecently developed or developing neighborhoods that haS h^^^ develeped. Another reason for Staff's recommendation is the current single-family lot inventory in Monticello, and the lack of sufficient housing opportunities. Additionally, these 59 single-family lots of discussion are a part of a 300 -lot overall residential development, where a variety of housing types is planned and exepcted. TERI LEHNER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-022 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FORTH E HAVEN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION, BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. 4. Other Business N/A S. Adjournment ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:32 P.M. Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 2A. Consideration of a request for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Development Stage Planned Unit Development, and Rezoning to Planned Unit Development District for a proposed 138 unit multiple family residential development. Applicant: Briggs Companies. Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Northwest Associated Consultants09/05/2023 Commission action): (NAC) 09/25/2023 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Chief Building and Zoning Official, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Project Engineer ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat for Great River 2nd Addition 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-25 recommending approval of a Preliminary Plat for Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-25 for a Preliminary Plat for Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-25 for additional information as directed by the Planning Commission. Decision 2: Consideration of a Development Stage Planned Unit Development 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-26 recommending approval of a Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions as listed in Exhibit Y. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-26 for a Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-26 for additional information as directed by the Planning Commission. Decision 3: Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance creating the Great River Planned Unit Development (PUD) District and rezoning from B-3 to Great River (PUD) District For Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2nd Addition. 1 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-27 recommending approval of a zoning ordinance amendment and rezoning from B-3, Highway Business to Great River PUD District for Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions as listed in Exhibit Y. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-27 for a zoning amendment and rezoned to Great River PUD District for Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-27 for additional information as directed by the Planning Commission. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description PID #: Planning Case Number: 2023-022 Outlot B, Great River Addition 155-226-000020 Request(s): Preliminary Plat, Final Plat (Council Action), Development Stage PUD, Rezoning from B-3 to Planned Unit Development Deadline for Decision: October 21, 2023 (60 -day deadline) December 20, 2023 (120 -day deadline) Land Use Designation: Commercial and Residential Flex Zoning Designation: B-3, Highway Commercial Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Attached Residential and Pond East: Vacant Commercial South: 1-94 West: Single -Family and Commercial Project Description: The applicant seeks approval of applications to allow a residential project totaling up to 138 multiple family units, with various parking facilities including a detached garage building sized to 2 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 accommodate work vehicles and recreational equipment storage for residents. Approvals required include platting the parcel from the larger land area, establishment of and rezoning to a PUD District, and Development Stage PUD consideration for the project design and details. The project is planned to be constructed in two phases, with 67 units in the first phase. The project application materials do not specify other first -phase improvements. ANALYSIS: Background The proposed project would be located on the farthest west 6 acres of the 20 -acre site owned by Riverwood Bank, between the north side of 1-94 and 71" Street. The project parcel to be platted would have frontage on both 7t" Street and Elm Street, as well as its exposure to 1-94. The current property is an undivided 20 -acre outlot, guided for mixed uses, and zoned B-3, Highway Business District. At a prior Concept PUD review, City officials expressed general conceptual agreement with the use of this westerly portion for residential uses, preserving the bulk of the property for future commercial. There was some question about the timing and need for additional multiple family units within the community and recognition that the City would be completing an update to its 2020 Housing Report for additional context on demand. Inclusion of residential on this parcel would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's designation of the area for mixed use (Commercial and Residential Flex). To accomplish the proposed development, the applicant must plat the subject parcel, obtain approval of an amendment to the zoning ordinance creating a PUD District (as well as rezoning of the parcel to that new district), and further obtain PUD project approvals. Following concept review, the next stage of review for PUD is the Development Stage approval. Preliminary Plat. The subject property is currently a 20 -acre parcel platted as Outlot B of the Great River Addition. The proposed plat creates one buildable parcel (Lot 1, Block 1), and reserves the remaining 14+ acres as an outlot, designated as Outlot A, both properties now renamed to the Great River 2nd Addition. The development parcel, Lot 1, consists of the westerly 6.0 acres of the platted area at the southeast corner of 7t" and Elm Streets. The parcel has approximately 500 feet of frontage on both streets. Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 Lot Requirements: As a B-3 property, the subject property would be required to have at least 100 feet of street frontage, with no specified minimum lot area. The parcel exceeds the standards of the B-3 District. For the proposed rezoning to PUD, there are no specific parcel dimension standards, and instead are required to be responsive to the development plans of the PUD. Utilities, Grading, Drainage & Stormwater: The City Engineer's office has provided a separate comment letter relating to plat easements for drainage and utilities and street right of way (including accommodation for pathway and sidewalk requirements). The City Engineer's letter also addresses the need for additional clarification on the civil plans, including more detailed information on grading, drainage and Stormwater managements. Access & Circulation: The development site plan illustrates site access at two points, one along 7t" Street and one along Elm Street. In regard to pathway facilities and both internal and external site circulation, the installation of pathway facilities on 7t" Street and Elm Street is required. The City Engineer will determine whether these facilities are to be sidewalk or bituminous pathway. These facilities are considered right of way improvements and are not eligible for park dedication credit. Plat Approval: As discussed in the Staff Recommendation, the applicant may wish to proceed with the plat even if the PUD plans for Development Stage approval are not yet ready for approval. The plat can be processed as proposed, even without the PUD requirements, since it greatly exceeds the B-3 requirements, and could be developed under the B-3 zoning in the event the PUD was not to proceed. If so, the conditions recommended for approval include a requirement that the City Engineer's office is able to confirm that no additional right of way would be necessary for transportation needs, including pathways and/or sidewalk. In addition, the City would reserve the ability to require park dedication as a part of the PUD approvals, since it would be at that stage that a residential project would trigger park requirements. Park Dedication. As noted above, park dedication is a requirement of subdivision for residential plats and by extension residential PUDs. The Park, Arts & Recreation Commission will review this proposed residential plat and PUD on September 21, 2023. 4 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 The Community Development Director and Park & Recreation Director recommend cash -in -lieu of land dedication for this project. This recommendation is based on the City's goals for park and recreation in this area of the community, the proximity of the site to existing park facilities, including the Monticello Community Center. The pathway connections required by the plat will support connectivity to these facilities. The staff recommendation is subject to the PARC's review and comment. Land Use and Planned Unit Development Analysis. The proposed project varies somewhat from that proposed at the Concept Stage PUD review, a common occurrence as additional design and engineering analysis is conducted for the project. The plans propose 67 residential units in the first phase, 138 units overall. The applicant proposes that 20% of the units will be income restricted (13-14 of the first phase total), with the remaining unit count at market rate. The following comments reflect the overall project totals, as the phasing has not been specified on the plans. The project design shows 5 levels of housing, with 5 units at a "walk -out" grade facing the corner of 7t" and Elm Streets, which also are accessed via the underground garage level; 28 units on the main grade level accessible from the parking lot (this "first" floor includes 17 "tuck - under" garages in the westerly wing); then 35 units per each of the upper 3 floors, a total of 138 units. The main level and upper three floors each include community room space and other common amenities. Density & Unit Floor Area: The unit breakdown is as follows: 17 studio apts; 34 1BR apts; 53 2BR apts; 34 3BR apts; Total of 249 BR; 138 units. For a six -acre parcel, the resulting density is 23 units per acre, within the expected density for multi -family development. The plans do not specify square footage of the units — thus, staff cannot provide information on consistency with the City's minimum unit square footage requirement per unit. For reference, the R-4 base floor area standard is 800 square feet of floor area average/unit, with no more than 10% of the units as studio units. Parking: A significant component of the project's PUD proposal was the construction of a series of detached garages that would be rented to project tenants for use as storage or shop space, similar to that often available to single family residents, but not to multi- family renters. In the concept drawings, two such structures were included in the parking field south and east of the principal structure. That has been changed to one 5 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 building, with the other location now occupied by a green space for stormwater infiltration. There are a variety of parking options on the project plans. Within the building, the lowest level includes 101 underground garage spaces, accessed via a garage entrance at the northwest corner of the building, from a driveway off of 7t" Street. Also in the main building, 18 "tuck -under" spaces are shown. These spaces are drive-in garages on the main parking level, also fronted by 18 open surface spaces; 1 of these 18 (both garage and open surface) is accessible. In addition to these spaces in the main building, the plan includes a detached garage building, shown with 30 individual bays of varying sizes (the applicant counts some of these as multiple spaces), and described as having a variety of garage door widths and heights. As noted, the purpose of the spaces in this building is to accommodate tenants who desire to drive work vehicles home, or store larger vehicles and equipment not typically available to residents of multi -family projects. As with the "tuck -under" garages in the main building, these garage units each have a single parking space in the open surface lot outside of the garage door access. The site plan shows a total of 157 surface parking spaces (including those mentioned with the garage units above). In addition, the plan shows 6 open surface spaces without direct drive aisle access at east end rank of the detached garage building. The purpose of these spaces is unclear and would appear to be designed to accommodate outdoor storage of equipment as an alternative to the indoor garage storage noted. In all, total parking available includes up to 276 parking spaces. Several of these spaces are available only as tandem spaces and would be dependent upon need to move vehicles that may be obstructing interior garage spaces. These would have to be tandem couplings of assigned spaces to specific renters to ensure access. As such, a parking management plan that assigns outdoor spaces would be necessary to ensure access to the tuck -under and garage parking areas. Counting all available parking (including the detached garage area) results in a parking ratio of approximately 1.1 spaces per bedroom, and exactly 2 per unit. The R-4 code standard is 1.2 spaces per bedroom. There is some question as to whether the detached garage units will be used for passenger vehicle parking, since the intent is to provide those garages for keeping of drive -home commercial vehicles, trailers, or even recreational vehicles, rather than typical tenant parking. In addition, the R-4 zoning standard is 1.1 spaces per dwelling unit maximum uncovered, which will need to be evaluated against final parking totals. 0 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 Further, since several inside spaces require a tandem parking arrangement with an outdoor parking space (as many as 48 such units), tenants of studio or one -bedroom apartments could be consuming 2 spaces of the total count, reducing the ratio available to other tenants. Again, a parking management system would be necessary to resolve concerns in this area. Building Architecture: The building design incorporates the bulk of each wing as a long flat wall with projecting metal balconies, and limited wall articulation at the entry connecting the two wings, as well as at the end of each wing. The roof line is punctuated with small rises over the balcony locations, approximately 2 feet above the otherwise continuous flat roof line. Because the architectural elevations do not include measurements, total height of the building (and the change in elevation along the parapet) are not calculated in this report. The building materials are dominated by a combination of horizontal and vertical steel siding. Brick areas are shown surrounding the main entrance, and at the lower residential level facing the northwest corner. Total percentages of the brick area cannot be determined based on the available drawings. In addition to clarification of building height, final materials and material quantities, staff would recommend that the applicant consider additional architectural detailing for the building. This would include additional wall articulation, more defined roofline articulation or parapet extensions, and/or incorporation of additional wood or stone on the elevations to provide additional visual interest and break-up of the wall planes. Site Planning: The site plan is similar in layout to the Concept review plan, with access from both 7t" and Elm Streets, and a tiered building descending the grade from southeast to northwest. The project proposes a 40 -foot setback from the two public streets, while the comparable R-4 (Multi -Family Residential) District would require a 100 foot setback. While this is one aspect of the PUD flexibility sought by the applicant, staff supports the design as it permits all of the parking to be screened from the streets by the building, leaving the street views of building and landscape only, without parking. The site plan information would benefit by identifying the amount of impervious surface, which appears to be significant. Engineering staff will be reviewing this aspect of the plan. Engineering will also review to ensure that regional ponding is adequate to address stormwater from the project. No ponding is shown on the plan, with the exception of the required infiltration ponding in the midst of the parking field. The plan includes a swimming pool and amenity area just along the south wall of the easterly wing. The site includes little other usable on-site green spaces, due to slopes 7 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 (north and east) or infiltration area in center of parking area. As with other aspects of the plan, the phasing of development for the amenity area is not clear. Pathways along Elm and 7t" Street are also required as part of platting. It is required that pathways be extended along 7t" and Elm Streets along both frontages of the property. The applicant's PUD site plan shall be revised to illustrate internal connections to these sidewalks and to the proposed site amenities. Landscape: There are a number of issues with the Landscaping Plan. Although minor, the plan doesn't match with civil site plan with regard to the garage access, as one example. The plans should be redrawn based on the final civil drawings. Of greater significance, the Landscape Plan includes no treatment at south and east perimeters of site. The boundary to the east will adjoin commercial property, requiring a buffer zone and appropriate landscape treatments per code. Along the freeway boundary, significant landscaping should be provided to buffer views of the freeway, including potential noise, from the residential building as much as possible. In similarly situated projects, berming has been an aspect of freeway -fronting residential and should be considered here. There will be no imminent sound wall construction, as the upgraded freeway construction was recently completed. Overall where it is shown, the plan includes minimal tree planting, and particularly sparse planting in the north and west perimeter slope area. The plan shows 10 overstory deciduous (maple), 12 medium size (birch), 8 ornamental (lilac), 21 evergreen (spruce) — plus 14 "Technto" arborvitae (large shrubs). The plan also shows 6 spruce trees front the site along each street, a span of nearly 500 feet per frontage. The infiltration area in the parking lot area is inconsistent between landscape and civil plans showing different numbers of trees and in differing locations. It will be important to understand what trees can be planted in this space, and where, given that the area is programmed to serve as a stormwater collection space. In addition, the only other planting in this space is shown to be sodded lawn grass — this should also be confirmed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION There are a number of details and recommended changes to the plan set that staff believes are necessary to proceed to a Development Stage PUD approval. These include clarifications of the applicant's phasing plan as related to site amenities and parking facilities, building height and other plan items, as well as recommendations related to building materials and design and significant enhancement to site landscaping. As such, staff recommends tabling action on Decisions 2 and 3 above for the Development Stage PUD and rezoning to PUD. 0 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 Due to timing constraints of the applicant and property owner, it is possible to proceed with approval of the Preliminary Plat (Decision 1), even though the details of the PUD would not be final until a subsequent date, as the plat meets the ordinance standards for subdivision. To accomplish this, the City could approve the Preliminary Plat (and Final Plat at City Council), but withhold approvals for the PUD rezoning and Development Stage PUD. The applicant could record the plat creating the 6 -acre development parcel and the remaining 14 -acre outlot. If the City were to approve the plat only at this time, the zoning would remain B-3. A development agreement would accompany the Final Plat as is typical, but would limit construction activity on the site until the applicant supplements the plans and PUD approvals are granted. This document would serve as a deed restriction to be lifted when the PUD is finally approved — and/or the applicant/owner chooses to proceed with a compliant B-3 project under the current zoning. The Exhibit Z Conditions of Approval are drafted such that the Planning Commission may recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat, with tabling of the Development Stage PUD. If Planning Commission wishes to recommend the Development Stage PUD, a set of recommendations specific to the PUD are provided. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-25, Preliminary Plat B. Resolution PC -2023-26, Development Stage PUD C. Resolution PC -2023-27, Rezoning from B-3 to PUD D. Ordinance No. XXX E. Aerial Image F. Applicant Narrative G. Floor Plans H. Building Elevations Site Plan J. Preliminary Plat K. Draft Final Plat L. Civil Plans, dated August 16, 2023, including: a. Removals and Tree Preservation b. Site Plan c. Grading Plan d. Utility Plan e. Stormwater Management Plan f. Erosion Control Plan g. SWPPP Narrative M. Landscape Plan N. Tree Inventory 0 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 O. MN DOT Preliminary Plat Comment Email, dated August 16, 2023 P. City Engineer's Letter, dated August 25, 2023 Q. Civil Plans with Engineering Comments R. Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 153.043(1) — R-4 Base Zoning District Standards S. Excerpts, Monticello Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3: Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation T. 2020 Monticello Housing Study Executive Summary Y. Plan Clarifications & Recommendations Z. Conditions of Approval — Preliminary Plat 10 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 EXHIBIT Y PLAN CLARIFICATIONS & STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Great River Planned Unit Development/Briggs Monticello Suites - Great River 2nd Addition Zoning Amendment for a PUD District Development Stage PUD 1. Compliance with the conditions in Exhibit Z for approval of the Great River 2nd Addition preliminary plat. 2. Clarify narrative, and match with plans for: i. Unit count ii. Detached Garage Count iii. Phasing 3. Clarify description of building height, materials quantities, and provide additional articulation — both wall and parapet. 4. Clarify management of parking areas and accessibility to tandem garage arrangements. 5. Supplement landscape plan significantly — particularly at perimeter of site — ornamental along 7th and Elm Streets; 6. Provide significant ornamental and buffering landscaping and berming along 1-94 and east buffer boundary. 7. Address open stalls on east end of detached garage — Outdoor storage is not an allowed use in residential areas. 8. Address architecture and features of detached garage buildings — esp. materials and building/garage door height, etc. 9. Address internal pedestrian circulation. 10. Address connections to public trail/sidewalk system. 11. Provide information on unit sizes, and other issues related to City requirements. 12. The residential PUD is subject to Park Dedication requirements as recommended by the PARC and approved by the City Council. 13. Comments and requirements of the City Council related to final plans, and any changes or amendments the Council may require. 14. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 31St 2023. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. Execution of amendment to the development agreement 11 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 incorporating the PUD and governing the PUD in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. 15. Execution of an amended PUD agreement governing the proposed and remaining development in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Briggs Monticello Suites Great River 2"d Addition Preliminary Plat 1. The Zoning Amendment establishing the PUD District, Rezoning of the Subject Property, and Development Stage PUD are tabled until additional plan information can be submitted and reviewed. 2. Approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat are conditioned on agreement to prohibit development of the proposed residential PUD until PUD plans have been submitted and approved by the City, subject to final development agreement and all other requirements and a requirement that the plat shall be developed in accordance with the applicable zoning in effect at the time of development. 3. Sidewalk and/or pathway facilities along Lot 1, Block 1 of the proposed plat as recommended by the City Engineer's office are required right of way improvements and shall be installed by the developer as a requirement of the plat. 4. Approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat are conditioned on verification by the City Engineer that the existing right of way for both 7t" Street and Elm Street will accommodate the installation of pedestrian path and/or sidewalk facilities by the development as required right-of-way improvements. 5. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 31St 2023, as well as comments provided on the civils plans. 6. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. 7. Execution of a development agreement governing the plat in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. 12 Planning Commission Agenda - 09/05/2023 13 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GREAT RIVER 2"d ADDITION, A DEVELOPMENT PARCEL AND OUTLOT: PID: 155-226-000020 WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a multi -family residential project on the above captioned parcel in a PUD District, known as the Monticello Suites PUD District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat the property to accommodate said use; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to develop the property for residential multi -family uses, consistent with the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan and economic development goals of the City for the described property; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for mixed uses as Commercial -Residential Flex in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently being considered for rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District which would control the uses and site development requirements on the property; and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plat would create parcels which are consistent with both the current zoning of B-3, Highway Business and with the proposed zoning of PUD, Monticello Suites PUD District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 5, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The proposed plat provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by accommodating proposed buildings and uses which are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-25 3. The proposed plat creates a parcel that may be utilized for either multi -family development as proposed, or for commercial uses if the residential project does not proceed. 4. The improvements resulting from the plat approval will have expected impacts on public services, including sanitary sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5. The improvements on the site facilitate appropriate development of the subject property, and are consistent with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 6. The plat is consistent with the requirements of both existing and proposed zoning requirements for such parcels, and reserves the remainder of the property for commercial development, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Great River 2nd Addition preliminary plat, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. The Zoning Amendment establishing the PUD District, Rezoning of the Subject Property, and Development Stage PUD are tabled until additional plan information can be submitted and reviewed. 2. Approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat are conditioned on agreement to prohibit development of the proposed residential PUD until PUD plans have been submitted and approved by the City, subject to final development agreement and all other requirements and a requirement that the plat shall be developed in accordance with the applicable zoning in effect at the time of development. 3. Sidewalk and/or pathway facilities along Lot 1, Block 1 of the proposed plat as recommended by the City Engineer's office are required right of way improvements and shall be installed by the developer as a requirement of the plat. 4. Approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat are conditioned on verification by the City Engineer that the existing right of way for both 7t" Street and Elm Street will accommodate the installation of pedestrian path and/or sidewalk facilities by the development as required right-of-way improvements. 5. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 311t, 2023, as well as comments provided on the civils plans. 6. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. 7. Execution of a development agreement governing the plat in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-25 ADOPTED this 5t" day of September, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Z ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD FOR PROPERTY PROPOSED AS THE GREAT RIVER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREAT RIVER 2"D ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a multi -family residential project on the above captioned parcel in a PUD District, known as the Great River PUD District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat the property to accommodate said use; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to develop the property for residential multi -family uses, consistent with the economic development goals of the city for the described property; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for mixed uses as Commercial -Residential Flex in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently being considered for rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District which would control the uses and site development requirements on the property; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat and Development Stage PUD are consistent with the long- term use and development of the property for mixed uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 5, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting proposed buildings to uses and architecture which are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-26 The proposed improvements on the site under the PUD are consistent with the needs of the development in this location, guided and zoned for mix use, including the proposed multi -family development. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sanitary sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4. The improvements on the site facilitate appropriate development of the subject property, and are consistent with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project, including managed public street access, structured parking, modified setbacks, affordable residential development, and provision of options for storage of work vehicles are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, including its most recent Housing Study, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Development Stage PUD for the Great River Planned Unit Development, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Y of the staff report as follows: 1. Compliance with the conditions in Exhibit Z for approval of the Great River 2nd Addition preliminary plat. 2. Clarify narrative, and match with plans for: i. Unit count ii. Detached Garage Count iii. Phasing 3. Clarify description of building height, materials quantities, and provide additional articulation — both wall and parapet. 4. Clarify management of parking areas and accessibility to tandem garage arrangements. 5. Supplement landscape plan significantly — particularly at perimeter of site — ornamental along 7th and Elm Streets; 6. Provide significant ornamental and buffering landscaping and berming along 1-94 and east buffer boundary. 7. Address open stalls on east end of detached garage — Outdoor storage is not an allowed use in residential areas. 8. Address architecture and features of detached garage buildings — esp. materials and building/garage door height, etc. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-26 9. Address internal pedestrian circulation. 10. Address connections to public trail/sidewalk system. 11. Provide information on unit sizes, and other issues related to City requirements. 12. The residential PUD is subject to Park Dedication requirements as recommended by the PARC and approved by the City Council. 13. Comments and requirements of the City Council related to final plans, and any changes or amendments the Council may require. 14. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 31St, 2023. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. Execution of amendment to the development agreement incorporating the PUD and governing the PUD in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. 15. Execution of an amended PUD agreement governing the proposed and remaining development in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. ADOPTED this 5th day of September, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Paul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE GREAT RIVER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO PUD, GREAT RIVER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREAT RIVER 2"D ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a multi -family residential project on the above captioned parcel in a PUD District, known as the Monticello Suites PUD District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat the property to accommodate said use; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to develop the property for residential multi -family uses, consistent with the economic development goals of the city for the described property; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for mixed uses as Commercial -Residential Flex in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently being considered for rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District which would control the uses and site development requirements on the property; and WHEREAS, the companion plat and Development Stage PUD are consistent with the long- term use and development of the property for mixed uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 5, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting proposed buildings to uses and architecture which are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-27 The proposed improvements on the site under the PUD are consistent with the needs of the development in this location, guided and zoned for mix use, including the proposed multi -family development. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sanitary sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4. The improvements on the site facilitate appropriate development of the subject property, and are consistent with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan through its EDA and other agencies. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project, including managed public street access, structured parking, modified setbacks, affordable residential development, and provision of options for storage of work vehicles are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, including its most recent Housing Study, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Zoning Amendment and the rezoning of the subject property to PUD, Great River PUD District, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Y of the staff report as follows: 1. Compliance with the conditions in Exhibit Z for approval of the Great River 2nd Addition preliminary plat. 2. Clarify narrative, and match with plans for: i. Unit count ii. Detached Garage Count iii. Phasing 3. Clarify description of building height, materials quantities, and provide additional articulation — both wall and parapet. 4. Clarify management of parking areas and accessibility to tandem garage arrangements. 5. Supplement landscape plan significantly — particularly at perimeter of site — ornamental along 7th and Elm Streets; 6. Provide significant ornamental and buffering landscaping and berming along 1-94 and east buffer boundary. 7. Address open stalls on east end of detached garage — Outdoor storage is not an allowed use in residential areas. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-27 8. Address architecture and features of detached garage buildings — esp. materials and building/garage door height, etc. 9. Address internal pedestrian circulation. 10. Address connections to public trail/sidewalk system. 11. Provide information on unit sizes, and other issues related to City requirements. 12. The residential PUD is subject to Park Dedication requirements as recommended by the PARC and approved by the City Council. 13. Comments and requirements of the City Council related to final plans, and any changes or amendments the Council may require. 14. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 31St, 2023. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. Execution of amendment to the development agreement incorporating the PUD and governing the PUD in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. 15. Execution of an amended PUD agreement governing the proposed and remaining development in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. ADOPTED this 5t" day of September, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. lLTA [9L1914011110Zw_1►1011►104191► ILTA II 4Is]►1 IN ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 153 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE GREAT RIVER PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO PUD, GREAT RIVER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREAT RIVER 2"D ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section §153.047 — Planned Unit Developments, is hereby amended by adding the following: (_xx_) Great River PUD District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Great River PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for multi -family residential land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Great River PUD District shall be multiple family residential uses on the subject property, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2023, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district shall be reviewed under the requirements of §153.028 (0) - Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to the various residential uses, as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. For the Great River PUD, storage and keeping of commercial vehicles, equipment, and related materials of residents of the district shall be an allowed accessory use within detached garage spaces as approved on the Final Stage PUD plans. No such storage or equipment shall be permitted within the principal residential structure. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Great River PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. (e) In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the R-4 Residential ORDINANCE NO. District shall apply. (f) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the §153.028(0)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B-3, Highway Business District to PUD, Great River Planned Unit Development District: Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2nd Addition Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this day of , 2023 ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, Administrator Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. AYES: NAYS: 1 Monticello Residential Suites Concept 1 Narrative 8-3-23 It is our goal is to provide a new 67 units, four story apartment project in two phases. The Exterior fagade would include a combination of Horizontal & Vertical 5" EDCO Steel siding Powder Coated Aluminum balconies throughout. All Trims including Garage doors, soffit, facia, to include Aluminum Wrap Accents. 148 + covered parking stalls in various options. Tuck Under/Dettached & Underground with EV charging Stations 30 of the 148 Detached Oversized Garages with a mix of cold and heated space. Including a garage door mix of 9x10/10x10/1Oxl2/12xl2 /12x14. Garages will be a mix of 24/48 ft in depth & 10/12/14/24/26 ft wide. All Garages will have openers & keyless entry & power. Proposed objectives are to Design, Construct and Manage 20% of Income Restricted and 80% of Market Rate Apartments in Monticello. To add an element of Superior and forward -thinking design based on the recent economic changes. In the Real estate space buyers today have half of the purchasing power than they did a year ago. Renters & Non -Renters in all levels of the lifecycle space want and need larger cold/heated garage space at their home. Space/Convenience/Affordability and time management in todays hectic demands are some of the reasons for the need of this project in Monticello. Proximity to highway 94, businesses that are local who can service and maintain unsecured personal property for this cliental is why this location is a viable option. These unique garage amenities within this housing community that can become available in 2025 is one of the reasons residents in Minnesota would choose Monticello. Retaining and providing current residents larger garage space needs and wants that are not being met will help accomplish Monticello's housing plan and will continue to see more pressure on the need/want for Oversized garages onsite where they live ... There is no rental housing options currently available in Monticello that offers this amenity. If we proceed now these options for the community will be available in 2025. Thank you for giving us this opportunity to work with and be a part of The City of Monticello Housing Efforts. Monticello Residential Suites Amenities 1. Community Room with kitchen, tables, furniture & Wi-Fi 2. Crafts & Exercise room 3. Elevator 4. 9 -foot ceilings on 1St floor 5. Stainless Steel Appliances 6. Designer Lighting 7. Controlled Entry 8. Surveillance throughout entire community 9. Onsite Management Office 10. Outside Patio 11. Outdoor Screen Porch with a rooftop patio 12. Indoor Parking. Attached & Detached 13. Oversized cold & heated Detached garages. 14. Business Flex Office 15. Yoga/Relaxation room 16. Youth development room 17. Movie Theater 18. Package room 19. Pet Spa 20. High Speed Internet Patrick Briggs i • p FA P1 �� ■ -M. - man, ff r d' IMM t i _ 9 ME j 4006L • 1 L• - t M• �a �j 1 Y dh f� 6 y � , a -a so r 11 n U r IT Aj Jimilp 1 ■m mmmppp'm 4�- Ail ■ ■ M 2 // 3 06 2 4 1 STAIR B :6�"V 27 — Id 1 BEDROOM 2 27 1I 28 11 29 30 1I 31 1 32 33 11 34 1 35 36 11 37 1 38 1I 39 11 40 41 11 42 1 43 1I 44 11 45 1 46 47 11 48 11 4911 50 �� 51 52 SII 53 PARKING 1 / 1/16" = V-0" 53 INDOOR HEATED PARKING STALLS '°I" 12 "II " I " I " I "I"II " I '° "I"I'Il�llll�ll..115116 5 v 28 6 29 7 30 8 31 9 32 10 33 11 34 12 35 48 INDOOR HEATED 13 PARKING STALLS 36 14 37 15 38 �16 39 �17 40 �18 41 19 42 �20 43 21 44 �22 45 23 46 �24 PARKING LEVEL - UNIT MIX 25 STAIR A (5) -UNITS STUDIOS -1 0 47 ONE BEDROOM -1 0 48 TWO BEDROOM -1 M THREE BEDROOM -2 3BEDROOM R CORE 3 BEDROOM 0 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 05 2 STAIR C *o Pwl STAIR 05 B O 2 BEDROOM 17 \ 1 06 06 \ \ 16 2 \ \ \ FIRST FLOOR EGRESS \ 15 \ 1 /16" = V-0" 1 BEDROOM - (::l)—\ \ 14 \ 13 1 BEDROOM V 12 STUDIO \ \ \ 10 \ TUCK UNDER GARAGE\ 1 BEDROOM \ 9 \ 8 �\ A 7 �A 1 BEDROOM \ \ \ 6 \ \ 5 �\ 2BEDROOM 4 �\ 3 �A \ \ 2 �\ STAIR A ONE ACCESIBLE \ PARKING STALL LEVEL 1 - UNIT MIX (27) - UNITS STUDIOS -3 ONE BEDROOM -6 TWO BEDROOM -10 0 THREE BEDROOM -8 17 -TUCK UNDER PARKING GARAGES 06 2 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM -'- STAIR A 1 BEDROOM 1BEDROOM STAIR B 1 BEDROOM 05 2 1BEDROOM E3 BE 2BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM 3BEDROOM STAIR C OD, SECOND - FOURTH LEVEL 1/16" = V-0" LEVEL 2 THRU 4 - UNIT MIX (35) - UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 tsnaas L;omDanies EL. ±950 qV CO APPROXIMATE J LOCAT OF I MAT -0" DINI� C/� STGO �� X0:0•• O x30, J b.' �� Q z Al G,\O\ x� O'' x3pb~ 10 0. O� Q� z O QQ R' P ' /V zS / °x30.0,. �\ / APPROXIMATE z / LOCATION 011,0• OF EL. ±960 / 10i°p110 PROPERTY 0x3p,0 LINE -SEE SURVEY MAIN ENTRY/ OFF E STREET F R / UP ER / PARKIN -SEE RVEY / O ELM ST. DRI ENTRANCE / �cD =- x, v � s b+ x33;0. X/ P\ 00 zsb x30;0., � Iz\, / / FZ. 9s 0 VIvor LGE NF ATION SIN APPROXIMA AREA CATION OF PROPERT E -S E E F� ;g SU Y 60 Ok ° x30:0., 0 4 co �e z\R STSz0.00j0 x30•-0.. p, �eR FBF �COM�OTO�S qRF Op +30;0.. CF F,CF z oka. PARKING STALLS 3 \R %h s, APP ROX/ MATFtOT 464:1„ OI MFRS/O� SF FF F r SUj�VFY Air. ,ATE LOCAL J OF ESTIMATED - BUILDING SETBACK- \ ELEVATION OF ACCE S TO = LOWER LEVEL U ER \ ILDING PAR ING °•x,0..011 \ ±89'-0" A CH. \ 950.0' =950 -0") 1 o°jO U GS AINSI G WALL (p�-p_v � -10 ze 3\R °x3°:0., 0 d 0' a AAF110,01. 3 RR x33:0.. 3 . -0 }"3br PL AREA N �� / O 3 Qv 11:0, p 8:0„ F�-9S0 ^o 50 -OUTDOOR 22 PARKING RF STALLS �0 o Q V \ 2 TRASH w w w w w xe'� ��Qj� ENCLOSURE WWWWWwYwWwWw� 1O, o JNFILTRATION \ w W w w w W W BASIN W w w w w 28 W 6/' 53 -OUTDOOR PARKING Q STALLS W W APPROXIMATE \ w w w w w w \ DETACHED GARAGES -44 W W W LOCATION OF \ w w w w ESTIMATED 40'-0" \ PARKING STALLS TOTAL w w w BUILDING ` \ O ONAL GARAGES CAN BE 44 INDOOR GARAGE PARKING STALLS /"` C \ SETBACK-SEESURVEY \ \ CO BINE C 31 \ \ Mainly Details Architectural Design, PLLC PH 612-382-5682 Suite 213, 1710 North Douglas Drive, Golden Valley, MN 55422 22 was prepared by me or under my direct supervision \ laws of the State of Minnesota. date: Gregg S. Graton, AIA \ .\GSGSig,iture%g0 pg SIGNATURE DATE: Owner: Larry Kasella consultants \ Architectural Design, PLLC. Surveyor: Civil Engineer: Structural Engineer: contractor Contact: Office: Mobile: \ 0 20 CO �/ J CO CO Ln ,z (V, W z \ �4� \ OJ 2m=§ This document is the property of Gregg S. Graton Architect and is intended to be an instrument of service for this project only. 9 ppRO ` Q" z2 Architect. Use infringements will be prosecuted. ki/�jgr� 614` APPROXIMATE 34 -OUTDOOR dimensions. Any and all discrepancies / `0%O//1•/F4 OF PARKINSTALLSG STALLS commencement of work. drawing �S/O� OY 'El' date: 06.26.23 drawing no. revisions: SFF ©00.00.00 A00.00.00 \ S LINE -SEE SURVEY APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF O ESTIMATED 40'-0" BUILDING o k;& 3 - x� SETBACK -SEE SETBACK -SEE � 4U SURVEY w Co BUILDING / SITE PLAN -CONCEPT 'E1' 1/32" = 1'-0" SITE DIAGRAM FROM COUNTY -GENERAL REFERENCE NO SCALE 5068001020 CODE SUMMARY 2020 MNBC CHAPTER 5 MAXIMUM AVERAGE GRADE PLANE -6-0" SO THAT GROUND FLOOR DOES NOT COUNT AS A STORY -GROUP -R -2 -TYPE VA -FOUR STORY MAXIMUM ABOVE GRADE PLANE. MAX. 36,000 S.F PER STORY BASIC ALLOWABLE -(SEE TABLE 506.2) NOTE: TYPE -III A OR B CONSTRUCTION MAXIMUM FIVE FLOORS ABOVE GRADE PLANE -(SEE TABLE 504.4), MAX. 48,000-S.F. III -B OR 72,000 III -A S.F PER STORY BASIC ALLOWABLE -(SEE TABLE 506.2) NOTE -FLOOR AREAS CAN BE INCREASED BY CREATING CONNECTED BUT INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS WITH TWO INDEPENDENT STAIRS EACH BY ADDING 2 HOUR SEPARATION BETWEEN EACH FIRE AREA. SITE PLAN -CONCEPT 'E1' -LEVEL -0 (BELOW GRADE UNDERGROUND PARKING 1/32" = 1'-0" / APPROXI E LOCATION OF ,9/R/V� J���� ESTIMATED S<<r x 30'-0" FS, 0;0 BUILDING / SF�MgTFp \O� SETBACK -SEE SURVEY O� } �O QQ Q - LI V APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPERTY LINE -SEE SURVEY ±348'-6" QI III MIKIr_ ' 5 \ SITE DIAGRAM FROM COUNTY -GENERAL REFERENCE sPi.o NO SCALE NOTE: THIS IS NOT AN ACTUAL SURVEY This drawing was prepared by the architect for preliminary planning purposes only. Actual building locations, property boundaries , setbacks, utilities and easements, are to be determined by surveyor. See Site Survey. LOT 'E' SITE AREA ±6.00 ACRES CONCEPT'E1' -APARTMENT DWELLING UNITS PROPOSED -(5) LEVEL 137 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDINGS 100 UNITS (THREE LEVELS OF APARTMENTS AND TWO LEVELS OF A COMBINATION OF PARKING AND APARTMENT UNITS) 137 / 6.0=22.8 UNITS PER ACRE =137 TOTAL APARTMENT UNITS =101 INDOOR LEVEL (1) HEATED ATTACHED COMMON GARAGE PARKING STALLS =17 INDOOR LEVEL (1) HEATED TUCK UNDER GARAGE PARKING STALLS =44 INDOOR DETACHED GARAGE PARKING STALLS =162 TOTAL INDOOR PARKING STALLS, 162 /137=1.18 163 OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS TOTAL TOTAL PARKING STALLS=321 325/137=2.37 PARKING STALLS PER UNIT UNIT MIX PER BUILDING LEVEL (0)= 5 UNITS STUDIOS -1 ONE BEDROOM -1 TWO BEDROOM -1 THREE BEDROOM -2 LEVEL (1)=27 UNITS STUDIOS -3 ONE BEDROOM -6 TWO BEDROOM -10 THREE BEDROOM -8 17 -TUCK UNDER PARKING GARAGES LEVEL (2)=35 UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 LEVEL (3)=35 UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 LEVEL (4)=35 UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 M N C-0 N O O Cn N M AAINLY DETAIL Mainly Details Architectural Design, PLLC PH 612-382-5682 Suite 213, 1710 North Douglas Drive, Golden Valley, MN 55422 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. date: Gregg S. Graton, AIA certification no. .\GSGSig,iture%g0 pg SIGNATURE DATE: Owner: Larry Kasella consultants Architect: Mainly Details, Architectural Design, PLLC. Surveyor: Civil Engineer: Structural Engineer: contractor Contact: Office: Mobile: project P -2022.028 -Maple Lake -Briggs CO �/ J CO CO Ln 0 E Q 71 (V, W z _ (n O O 2m=§ This document is the property of Gregg S. Graton Architect and is intended to be an instrument of service for this project only. No reproduction is allowed without the written consent of Gregg S. Graton Architect. Use infringements will be prosecuted. The contractor is responsible for the verification of all on-site conditions and dimensions. Any and all discrepancies from that indicated by these documents shall be reported to the general contractor/ owner or architect prior to commencement of work. drawing Concept 'El' date: 06.26.23 drawing no. revisions: ,&00.00.00�.�� SPI .0 ® 00.00.00 ©00.00.00 A00.00.00 ®00.00.00 of: Proposed Plat Description: Ou tlo t B, GREAT RIVER ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota Survey Notes: I. This survey was performed without the benefit of a title report. No search for restrictions or easements was made by the surveyor. We reserve the right to update this survey upon the receipt of title documentation. 2. An official wetland delineation was not requested or performed. J. Subject property is not part of the shoreland district or within a flood plain district as mapped by FEMA. 4. Contours were created using RTK GPS methods. 5. Utilities shown per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 23/772581. Not all utilities may have been located. Locations shall be verified. 6. There may be question whether the street vacation described in Doc. No. 1237796 included the West Half of Minnesota Street. Preliminary Plat of X 0 100 SCALE: I" = 100' ProjectBM: h Eley.• 944.53/ I" 1 %-00.-i!iTF /P%2/lN10 �W 4606 S GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION Storm Sewer STMH l - Rim E/ev.=942.66 STMH 2 - Rim E/ev.=943.62 W Inv.=934.20 E In v. = 934.20 S Inv.=939.47 STMH 3 - Rim E/ev.=946.34 W Inv.=935.52 E Inv.=935.52 S Inv =Not acquired STMH 4 - Rim E/ev.=949.05 W Inv.=937.73 E Inv.=937.73 S Inv =Not acquired STMH 5 - Rim E/ev.=950.39 W Inv.=938.82 E Inv.=938.82 S Inv =Not acquired STMH 6 - Rim E/ev.=95/.35 W Inv.=94/.03 E Inv.=94/.03 S Inv =Not acquired STMH 7 - Rim E/ev.=952.22 STMH 8 - Rim E/ev.=95/.00 S TMH 9 - Rim E/e v. = 945.16 W Inv.=937.33 E Inv.=937.33 SE Inv. = 939.76 STMH l0 - Rim E/ev.=944.69 Storm Sewer CB l - Fl Elev.=945.34 NE Inv.=941.5/ CB 2 - Fl E/ev.=942.3/ N In v. = 935.53 CB 3 - Fl E/ev.=942.27 N Inv.=933.12 S Inv.=933.12 CB 4 - Fl E/ev.=943.24 N Inv.=939.72 CB 5 - Fl E/ev.=945.98 N Inv.=939.78 S Inv.=939.78 CB 6 - Fl E/ev.=946.00 N Inv.=942.57 CB 7 - Fl E/ev.=948.78 N Inv.=945.7/ CB 8 - Fl E/e v. = 950.09 N Inv.=942.89 S Inv.=942.89 CB 9 - Fl E/ev.=951.18 NE Inv.=947.69 CB l0 - Fl E/e v. = 950.72 CB 11 - Fl E/ev=950.75 CB /2 - Fl E/ev.=944.78 CB /3 - Fl E/ev.=945.60 E Inv=94/.67 NE Inv.=941.52 CB /4 - Fl E/ev.=945.41 W Inv.=942.15 CB /5 - Fl E/e v. = 943.92 CB 16 - Fl E/ev.=944.12 CB /7 - Fl E/ev.=944.52 CB /8 - Fl E/ev.=944.86 CB /9 - Fl E/ev.=944.90 CB 20 - Fl E/ev.=944.53 CB 2/ - Fl E/ev.=946.58 CB 22 - Rim E/e v. = 947 05 Sanitary Sewer SMH l - Rim E/e v. = 960.99 NE Inv.=948.30 SE Inv.=949.39 SMH 2 - Rim E/ev.=946.9/ NE Inv.=935.4/ SW Inv.=935.4/ SMH 3 - Rim E/e v. = 942.48 NE Inv.=9/4.58 SW Inv.=9/4.58 SE Inv.=9/4.58 SMH 4 - Rim E/e v. = 943.33 SMH 5 - Rim E/e v. = 943. l7 E Inv.=932.86 W Inv.=932.86 SMH 6 - Rim E/e v. = 945. l7 E Inv.=933.24 W Inv.=933.24 S Inv.=933.24 SMH 7 - Rim E/e v. = 948. l6 E Inv. = 933.79 W Inv. = 933.79 SMH 8 - Rim E/e v. = 950.44 W Inv.=934.7/ S Inv.=934.7/ SMH 9 - Rim E/e v. = 952.28 E Inv.=936.87 S Inv. = 936.87 SMH l0 - Rim E/e v. = 952.29 SMH 11 - Rim E/ev.=949.18 SMH 12 - Rim E/e v. = 944.52 N Inv.=933.13 S Inv. = 933. l3 W Inv.=933.13 SMH l3 - Rim E/e v. = 953.85 N Inv. = 938.03 S Inv.=938.03 SMH 14 - Rim E/e v. = 954.94 N Inv.=938.74 S Inv.=938.74 E Inv=938.74 SMH 15 - Rim E/ev.=947.38 N Inv.=940.42 S Inv.=940.42 ' �` FES J6" CMP Yv1 ,� SMH _/ew 93255 "N r \o ,IN 0 .h�o�°e , �'; RR --�\� \ N 87011'47" W hh �, �, `9Sza�. -, r ./ �/ / , • r _ I 9� TMH .30.00 I ^ \ S 6 Q\�o�`(`� a� /j 4 3TMH 4_ StY l " CMP p/� �¢96�p -�� y 58.6 �t / Drainage and Utility Easement 0 �% �o� 9 (Per GREAT RI VER ADDITION) TION) - - � 0�0 " , . , -,- r , i A t-- r , o�\/ 2 IP /2 =/2°¢O'/ �2 a �St ^ `' ��l :.l _ ' L_ L / .\� / �0 0\ e s e BL BL L=9/./2' i� \ 89/ ���?.' �",� PID: 155-500-1132/3 ��\ G009 /^/ \�z O o s //n / // �� ? 2�'� - IT IRET Properties I (y / �\ / �J `" � \ e �f / TNH X\ 5/ev: \29 3 0 ��j? v t/Ot " i .N -i- r, i A -r -r r-- r, `/ \ \ I l\ll l I h"I \ok5e�� /� `'0� at�r� BI k 1 C0` / / \ \ 7377E lP Y2 \� lP Y2 i I I r' i, T PID: 155-500-1/3209 I IP Y2 ` �\ O� Lot 1 �� \ �� 4 .. i t 0 e <-� h,j et9 / / .`� / o�j //\ 44606\ ?�A�?\_ 44606 IP Y2" Bruce &Marilyn Springb� g 0 P Area: 6.00% Ac. y( �g / - \ ��`� 44606_ •-� �h / / - FES; 16 GMP I / 0 �� PID: If SO Monticello Dew 959.01 � // \ s � TNH Elev �OSt� � -��VMh, N 84 '" EK / 8 Dc / H El e �9Ej+ \ N`Q4 CB IPg5 " 33.0 a 4606 96 ' �0v /// o°��oc� U Utility Eosemefoot gt and \ \ z`�,-Z�2s�46��- °p �N 88°54'50" E (per Doc. No. 5676/8 IP Y2"� 1\ tatus unknown > 44606 _ R'496.00 - 235 J`\\� �,' i� `� ` L/ S ol �E. \oQ 44606 952. l0 4460 Q / a PID: 155-226-000020 � , R/ve�Bank 95b' O n \9286 \ S r,r� i� 9,) \ S / s '01, Outlot A \ \ � // // r\ Area: 14.16Y- Ac. r\ En H /5 -6- Fence 22325 \ a" //n - • 7377,6 o e hHes / w \ \ter/\///7e of OU t SAt h� c ortheOSter/y 41_ o /r/terstote t 94 Map symbol & soil name Hydrologic group Water table depth (in) 1377E: Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes A >80 13776: Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes A >80 D67A: Hubbard loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes A >80 406: Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B >80 s Data from USDA Web Soil Survey I hereby certify that a boundary survey has been completed for the preliminary plat of GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota. Signed: �. Craig A. Wensmann Date: 7/5/23 Lic. No. 47466 CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Bearings are based on the plat of GREAT RIVER ADDITION. For the purpose of this plat, the East line of Outlot B is assumed to bear South 0 degrees 22 minutes 05 seconds West l- TNH _ j"946 2P1D:155-068-0000/0 Beep in /P Y2" lP Y2 Open 13637 t:I T IP Y it $ 8995, en CB \ V °33 .82 R=�07.3i - IP /P Open Opt948.16e .r \I/P Y2- 950 i I 406 I I m /3 I. � 0 q) I el- O v - I c� IN1 to o I�I v Drai ge and Utility Easement (Per EAT RI VER ADDI TION h & KZ R AN ADDI TION) " 14 .L ,40.2 �7 lP Y2„ 1632/ / / / r, / / A A A " I K IP Y2" moo Open \ \ 0.9 8 I 2 ?A, r, r, , -,- , ,. 0,, 11 11\1 open H 79 °4527" wIN,. BOGART. PEDERSON & ASSOC/ATE Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: -/2�--------+/2- NOT TO SCALE Being 12 feet in width and adjoining lot lot lines unless otherwise indicated on the plat. DATE: 6/28/23 FIELD DATE: June 27th, 2023 BK/PG: 86.23/Pg. 61&62 DRAWN BY: CK CHECKED BY: CAW DWG FILE: 23-0250 Prelim FILE NO: 23-0250.00 REVISIONS: 8-14-23 add trees, scale, north arrow I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: �. Craig A. Wensmann Date: 7/5/23 Lic. No. 47466 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 for Pat Briggs GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION/ City of Monticello INC, I Wright County, MN • Denotes found iron monument Denotes found cast iron monument ® Denotes Y2 inch x 14 inch iron monument with a plastic plug stamped R.L.S. 47466 to be set LEGEND: within one year of platting date )gff Denotes found PK nail Denotes catch basin ❑E Denotes electrical cabinet ® Denotes water service REFERENCE BENCHMARK: ® Denotes fiber optic marker First top nut hydrant SE'ly of the intersection of Elm St. and 7th St. W. Denotes sanitary manhole Elevation = 948.18 feet (City Datum) Denotes watervalve -7C)7 Denotes sign CT) Denotes power pole PROJECT BENCHMARK: Top nut hydrant in the NW'ly quadrant of Denotes guy wire Elm St. and 7th St. W. L , Denotes telephone pedestal Elevation = 944.53 feet (City Datum) Denotes fiber optic vault Denotes hydrant OWNER: Riverwood Bank ® Denotes beehive catchbosin 1421 E 7th St © Denotes bo/lard Monticello, MN 55362 *c Denotes light pole (763) 295-2265 Denotes tree, coniferous DEVELOPER: Denotes tree, deciduous Briggs Companies Denotes flared end section c/o Patrick Briggs - Denotes culvert P.0 Box 719 Big Lake, MN 55309 LS 16321 Denotes David Thorp, LS (612) 919-1561 LS 13637 Denotes Paul Thorp, LS LS 44606 Denotes Kyle Klosen, LS LS 15233 Denotes Dennis Taylor, LS SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS: Bogart, Pederson &Associates, Inc. Denotes bituminous surface 13076 First Street Becker, MN 55308-9322 763-262-8822 Denotes concrete surface TOTAL AREA: 20.16'/- Acres Denotes gravel surface EXISTING ZONING: B-3 Highway Business Denotes wood fence District Denotes chainlink fence PROPOSED ZONING: Planned Unit - - Denotes overhead electric Development (PUD) - - - Denotes easement Denotes major contour Denotes minor contour - Denotes sanitary sewer Denotes storm sewer Denotes waterline DENOTES BUILDING SETBACKS: - Denotes existing odjoiners 30' Side - SBL - Denotes building setback line 40' Street/Highway l- TNH _ j"946 2P1D:155-068-0000/0 Beep in /P Y2" lP Y2 Open 13637 t:I T IP Y it $ 8995, en CB \ V °33 .82 R=�07.3i - IP /P Open Opt948.16e .r \I/P Y2- 950 i I 406 I I m /3 I. � 0 q) I el- O v - I c� IN1 to o I�I v Drai ge and Utility Easement (Per EAT RI VER ADDI TION h & KZ R AN ADDI TION) " 14 .L ,40.2 �7 lP Y2„ 1632/ / / / r, / / A A A " I K IP Y2" moo Open \ \ 0.9 8 I 2 ?A, r, r, , -,- , ,. 0,, 11 11\1 open H 79 °4527" wIN,. BOGART. PEDERSON & ASSOC/ATE Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: -/2�--------+/2- NOT TO SCALE Being 12 feet in width and adjoining lot lot lines unless otherwise indicated on the plat. DATE: 6/28/23 FIELD DATE: June 27th, 2023 BK/PG: 86.23/Pg. 61&62 DRAWN BY: CK CHECKED BY: CAW DWG FILE: 23-0250 Prelim FILE NO: 23-0250.00 REVISIONS: 8-14-23 add trees, scale, north arrow I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: �. Craig A. Wensmann Date: 7/5/23 Lic. No. 47466 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 for Pat Briggs GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION/ City of Monticello INC, I Wright County, MN GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Briggs Companies, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability Company, owner of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: Outlot B, GREAT RIVER ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION, and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by the plat. In witness whereof said Briggs Companies, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability Company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of Patrick Briggs, Chief Officer 13 STATE OF MINNESOTA, 0 100 COUNTY OF (SCALE IN FEET) LEGEND: This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by by Patrick Briggs, Chief SCALE: I INCH = 100 FEET • Denotes found iron monument Den® otthzinch c 14 in pOfficer. Bearings are based on the plat of GREAT RIVER pipe wiaplast plug stamped ADDITION. For the purpose of this plot, the East R.L.S. 47466, unless otherwise line of Outlot B is assumed to bear South 0 noted, to be set within one year Notary Public, County, Minnesota degrees 22 minutes 05 seconds West of platting date Signature Q Denotes found cast iron monument )(PK Denotes found PK nail My Commission Expires Drainage and Utility Easements are LS 16321 Denotes David Thorp, LS (Printed Name) shown thus: LS 13637 Denotes Paul Thorp, LS kil K LS 44606 Denotes Kyle Klasen, LS I, Craig A. Wensmann, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am aduly - — — — — — — — — — — LS 15233 Denotes Dennis Taylor, LS Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all Ip Y2 — — — — — Denotes easement mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be N 85°09'/0" W Inch NOT TO SCALE Denotes existing adjoiners correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the 53./ 44606 Being 12 feet in width and adjoining lot lot lines date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. \ / unless otherwise indicated on the plat. `Y. � ' Craig A. Wensmann, Land Surveyor v // P %2 \ Minnesota License No. 47466 �� `` �'� Inch 6'� P /2 \ 44606 STATE OF MINNESOTA �- ` / / r `44606 ,i \ \ — N 87011'47" W 00 COUNTY OF ', `, V ` - \¢\ 30 / S 0 \ r . The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of k9 / Drainage and Utility Easement 20 by Craig A. Wensmann Land Surveyor, Minnesota License Number 47466. / / o� (Per GREAT RIVER ADDITION) — - CITY OF MONY/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN VICINITY MAP Sec. 10 & 11, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 Wright County, MN %% / o�� N lP %2 �— — =12°40'/ �� 4, `, \ r / % / E0 °rthe Inch lP %2 L=9/./2 ��9 �O/?i' ��s \ n ., r, n r— r, Notary Public, County, Minnesota (, <;v� \ / hog\ / \\fie o °Stery //44606 4ch�vo / '2 ,Q �),` ,/ i� /r ' ��� Signature r , ° / \ �t / het\� 04, \ / / /98?09. A\/,— r, n v e9 B / 00 OO / I i 1-11 L11 i r -i i <�r� Block 1 // / lP �2\� \ IP �2 v .. L_ i L_ L/ �Pch2 M Commission Expires �� / ° / \ Inch ! Inch T �� r , Y P / \ �� / \ �� a Open K IP %2 (Printed Name) -, ` / p"�' / _\ O� ? \/ �A -/ Inch Beep in IP %2 —/ P �2 — 44606 2 44606 s0. .—. — IInch �37 — — — — Con c. Inch 13637 CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION / F, / 'Q� IP %2 o i n — Open / / �9 Inch N 84 59 04 E Be it known that at a meeting held on this day of , ;,`_� K / /P %2 ��` / 60 44606 33.03 I 14=11`bl'59 0 20 the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, did hereby r Inch Lot 1 oh°' // oo ocw 12 foot Drainage and O a X20 0 /P %2 69 � review and approve this plat of GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION lP /2 X44606 / o tc Utility Easement �� X9'46" CO N 88054'50" E Inch L=97.69j. IP %2 Inch ^� / o�c yo r ` r 43, 4 Open S 89°53'44" E 300.82 R=507.31 Inch 44606 / �t �o , r A (per Doc. No. 5676/8) IP /2 \ ,� 8=496.00 — 235.25 r' `' *Status unknown Inch --- 1632/ IP /P/2 1233 --- In Chairperson Secretary \ \ �/ 44606 Inch r lP /2 �\ N 5/ w I P h Open �Inch r 36" Inch I „ „ v P Y // / Qt°Qa 44606 44606/nchl IIP %2 22 Open p CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA \ 4 �-6,/4 Open �I Open 9 60 / o This plat of GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of 28p Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of `? 20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Outlot A Mayor City Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY ENGINEER This plat was reviewed and recommended for approval this Wright County Engineer day of , 20 L x,,55/a o L6 a; 223'25,,, Z I o o o h �woll — • 6 I �� 413 3 \\\� -ri~I� N I to � �- oQ a SoUt I LQ o N hweSter/y //7e o v� o I z `u I °0 out/°t B o o � I � I Drainage and Utility Easement Northeost r� (Per GREAT RIVER ADDI TION q6 (Per 98 I I /I & KIRKMAN ADDITION) Of ��� ° 33 33 9 / terstate 94 — �j II I 0 L 40--,9 / WRIGHT COUNTY LAND RECORDS IP Y2 _ _ \ Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to /nchOpen _ 34 48` r �� � IP /2 ii i ii ii i ii iii Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of 20 - • ` — — _ _ Inch ' L / L / ` / " N 7g 5`3.94 - ' Ope- 4527'1 W Wright County Land Records Administrator WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this day of 20 at o'clock .M. and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. Sleeve as Document No. Wright County Recorder BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOC/AYES, INC. MONTICELLO SUITES BRIGGS COMPANIES ELM STREET & 7TH STREET WEST CITY OF MONTICELLO,, SHERBURNE COUNTY, MN CIVIL & SURVEY PLANS PREPARED BY: Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CaCI= •L cam:) Glearwate: ,. Ee�ker .. J Sa l:d a Sil�+er:Cret"t 1J mwl ' AUGUST, 2023 PRELIMINARY PLANS PROJECT LOCATION r- LJ SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA VICINITY MAP NO SCALE Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title Co Cover C1 Removals and Tree Preservation C2 Site Plan C3 Grading Plan C4 Utility Plan C5 Stormwater Management Plan C6 Erosion Control Plan C7 SWPPP Narrative C8 City Details C9 Site Details REV DATE DESCRIPTION NO. - 08/16/2023 DRAWINGS ISSUED TO CITY PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ARE QUALITY LEVEL D. QUALITY LEVEL D PROVIDES THE MOST BASIC LEVEL OF INFORMATION. IT INVOLVES COLLECTING DATA FROM EXISTING UTILITY RECORDS. RECORDS MAY INCLUDE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS, DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICES MAPS, EXISTING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DATABASES. CONSTRUCTION PLANS. ETC. � � s \ s E -- 's, --s / \9 \ SM\ *t llp STMH 3 FSI ,A - 19 6 / ° / \\ \ \ \ Q, - / AUL PROTECT TREES ON BOUNDARY WITH\ _� OROGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE \ S`� S STMH 4 K �— s c� 'o s _ s �S �\ FES 36" CMP S Sr" \ \ Elev.• 932.55 s � D673 � � zll/ / IQ s9 \ \ \ SMH 8 FES 18" CMP / s \ 9si De v.• 958.62 / / 78' CURB CUT / \ / S 8L \ SBL / / / FES 18" �P Dev.• f9.01 K / / 958 \ \ S94 -%( \ \ \ MAINTAIN MN`DOT FZNCE \ se / ` 61 Sed \ seg sec sec / / — m LEGEND: EN 0 REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION (AS INDICATED). REMOVE EXISTING TREES (AS INDICATED) REMOVE FEATURE (AS INDICATED) SALVAGE (AS INDICATED) SAW -CUT DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES: 0 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 1. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM OR COORDINATE ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS FROM EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING, AS WELL AS TO ALL ON-SITE AMENITIES. THESE CONNECTIONS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SANITARY SEWER, UNDERGROUND GAS, ETC. 2. THE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY CONNECTIONS (UNDERGROUND GAS, WATERMAIN, AND STORM SEWER) MAY REQUIRE A PERMIT FROM THE CITY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ELEVATIONS AT PROPOSED CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO FOR ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS, SERVICE TERMINATIONS AND REMOVALS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS WITH THE UTILITY PROVIDERS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS/DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND WORK WITHIN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAYS. 5. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND TREES (NOTED AND NOT NOTED) TO REMAIN AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR DAMAGES TO ANY FEATURES TO REMAIN. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 �o 0 O M O O 0 L0 N O M N ' I O v N M O m U) z o 0 co m 0 Lu z00 «w N Q W � O N Z Y Ll a g U IU m z � Lu 0 Q Lu O U> III Q W 0' 2 > J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN O v N M O U) z o 0 M L� W z00 «w N Q W � O N W H W Y� a g U IU m u � Lu 0 Q Lu O "ZJ ZwQ Lu C-4 CZ'N ♦^ wwZ deo /c/j�) V♦ � � 2 Z:)ZZ (1) N OM V 0w0 CDo OQ �J� CD F_ MryJ� Z>> OJ W oV i w �H V) to W W F_z � Q a— O G JO Lu U U_ V z(D O Or - 2 c 2m SHEET NO. I z p > Lu O V„ U Lu t1A � i LLJ cl \ \ j IIII � - s S- -_ s - \ �\ \ FES 36" CMP s STh, \\ \ `rev.• 932.55 l D679 o VORTH INFILTRATION BASIN \ \ \ \ \ v \► �� ------STMH 4 / I r11 J I. W UKIVt LNI KHIVI,t( I YY.) \ \ FES /8" CMP / /�� °, s z V 'p�� y De v.• 958.62 I / V / o�VATION OF ACCESS TO LOWER LEVEL �UNDER R=20; - -_- _ F zeR z _ BUILDING PARKING - R=20' ^ / ° O R=20' R-20' ., L=31.4' L=_32.9' SOL � 23.3' RETAINING L J SBL max, WALL R=20' SBL / L=25.1' O °xso: ZQR / 17 ^o "d 3>° 3p. O L=12.5' R=5' / �p" L=10. \ 16.3' L=24.0' / , R=5 O� s>.° 1 o)AROEA' / / ^ a (J�/ LEVEL 0 ENTRY33 �(ERHEAD DOOR / .[ /�J /,� =89' 0" ARCH. (950.0' =950'-0•) USGS) \ ELM ST DRIVE ENTRANCE (TYP.) / W L= '.0 / j/ �0� / R=5' T z4 \ / �` R=4' L=9.8' / '0*a°:. L-11.1' O O O O O ADA RAMP o R-20 a'co. 26.OUTDOOR O Y • • . . / / PARKING ^ O • O • • / STALLS PLAY / 4 / AREA / �� 38 DOOR 22 PARKING STALLS \ \ / n gRkFsse R=5' \ RAIN TURRET L--Ri.s' V \X , srq� NO F 2 L=7.s' / ol </ B612 CURB & GUTTER ^m \ 2 \ co \2\3\ Se< , z ENCLOSURE a TRASH 780 8p 0'\ \ \ M \ CENT � RAL INFILTRATION BASIN �/S F // RP/IN TURRET \ L=28.1' \ \ L=7.9' L=11.9' E ' ^ o RAIN TURRET NO \ \ \ \ \ ze \ W y\W W W y R-5 � �O Or ch 1?0 L=19.5' NG \ � •, // //// / p'S�T \ \ R=5' \ \ g Las 6e< v PARKING STALLS TOTAL W W/ / / R=5' 6' \ aalNDooRGARAGEPARKINcsrALLs OPTIONAL GARAGES CAN BE o R=5' CONFIGURED TO BE l / 3, / EAST INFILTRATION BASIN L=7.9'o COMBINED /✓ "�/ // /• \ \ S L=7.9' \ 9( \ O IL=7.0' C / / / \ V Sed 406 � \ � O S L=8.T \ /L � / / se � / I/ co / sk m ,z pro' V \ \ \ \ 34 -OUTDOOR \\ �Bt PARKING \ STALLS `� / Set / \ 7-9 \ \ R=5 R=15' / �- L=19:8' /� 1-94 LEGEND: N po PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED GRAVEL SURFACING 0 40' A a a PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT SCALE: 1" = 40' W W W W W W W W W W W W W PROPOSED TURF ESTABLISHMENT W W W W W W W z } O � 0 U o U) w Lu U) o �2 U) z Q 0 W o CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612 p 0 PROPOSED SIGN SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO FACE OF CURB. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO BACK OF CURB. 2. ALL CONCRETE RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS. 6. SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 7. LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED TO RECEIVE A CERTAIN SEED MIX SHALL BE MIXED WITH SEED MIX 25-131. 9. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: LOT'E' SITE AREA±6.00 ACRES CONCEPT'E1' -APARTMENT DWELLING UNITS PROPOSED -(5) LEVEL 137 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDINGS 100 UNITS (THREE LEVELS OF APARTMENTS AND TWO LEVELS OF A COMBINATION OF PARKING AND APARTMENT UNITS) 137 / 6.0=22.8 UNITS PER ACRE =137 TOTAL APARTMENT UNITS =101 INDOOR LEVEL (1) HEATED ATTACHED COMMON GARAGE PARKING STALLS =17 INDOOR LEVEL (1) HEATED TUCK UNDER GARAGE PARKING STALLS =44 INDOOR DETACHED GARAGE PARKING STALLS =162 TOTAL INDOOR PARKING STALLS, 162 /137=1.18 163 OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS TOTAL TOTAL PARKING STALLS=321 325/137=2.37 PARKING STALLS PER UNIT IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS -PAVEMENT 107,800 S.F. -BUILDING 46,715 S.F -GRASS 106,644 S.F. -TOTAL 261,159 S.F. % IMPERVIOUS 59.1% UNIT MIX PER BUILDING LEVEL (0)= 5 UNITS STUDIOS -1 ONE BEDROOM -1 TWO BEDROOM -1 THREE BEDROOM -2 LEVEL (1)=27 UNITS STUDIOS -3 ONE BEDROOM -6 TWO BEDROOM -10 THREE BEDROOM -8 17 -TUCK UNDER PARKING GARAGES LEVEL (2)=35 UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 LEVEL (3)=35 UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 LEVEL (4)=35 UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 w0 IY Z ' N U Q o m Lo �o O N I I z O U N M m m ♦ V^ z w O O �z m 0 W z °° op N Q W Z Z Y O (D m z L W X Q �W O"ZJWN cL Q W 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN z O U N M w 9)/ ♦ V^ z w O O �z LoV lfj -'j- W � z °° op N Q W LL N W1 W YA li5; Q m .. L W X Q �W O"ZJWN ZwQ Q'N wwZ (neo V♦ DZU) �M V LuZ LL CD O Q �J� 0-1 O~ coJ� Z>> QUW OJ W �V �H SHEET NO. C2 Q W Ln z w w �z 0 U V) O t1A JO Lu U o U cn V a--+ z O _D � cc� G m O U SHEET NO. C2 Q W Ln \ Is, SMH 4 LEGEND: N� \ s TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE z } 7 \ s EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (PER DETAIL) \\ \ FES 36 " CMP s s U) o IMH 2 STM.. Kiev.• 932.55 0 40' Lu \ D s \ \ ASF GRADING LIMITS AND PROPOSED cn \\ TEMPORARY SILT FENCE cn \ / U NORTH INFIL. BASIN \ \ FIBER -LOG ROLLS SCALE: 1" = 40' EOF=945.80 Q `- \\ TREATMENT VOL.=2,284 C.F. \ \ \\ i;�°o�r s / \ P,•i PROPOSED RIP RAP � 067B\ � X 980.50 TC NEW TOP -BACK OF CURB ELEVATION M Lu X 980.50 FL NEW FLOW LINE OF CURB ELEVATION o 946.20 FG \ \ \ Q 9a� EOF=945.80 \ \ ` X 980.50 SW NEW SIDEWALK ELEVATION /� � / '�• 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP \' \ o 91.1 X 980.50 TP NEW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION w O ,C/�` � g s STMH 3 ' -/ _ X 980.50 TG NEW TOP OF GRAVEL ELEVATION z O RA 2!i r 9 49 4g 4j \ 46 AUL ��� \ \ \ \ \ s STMH 4 X 980.50 FG NEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION o U z S 950.00 FG \ \ 6 \ \ X 980.50 EX EXISTING ELEVATION C° o S MH 7 o N cZ! may^ 960 \ S 984 PROPOSED CONTOUR /E-/ \ / \iso \ \ CB PROPOSED SLOPE m FES l8" CMP / / 950.50 FG \ 9si \ \ LU Co Elev.• 958.62 z Z Y - O E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW °o z Lw I / / ya 950.00 FG .o° °1° CB 8 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER- HIGH FLOW Fw-- < w O w 951 948.4 TC 948.40 FL Q w (Y = > J 949.70 TC 0 0 U 0 LL AR 952` \- -\_ - 949.20 FL OROS S - - - - N m C, < V< FQgA ` \ 950.00 TW o \ � 955 3 FG 961.00 SW gRgcFF � 6R�o FRT 953 ` SB 1` L 953.00 TW L� ° 01, 9'SQ ?90 950.33 TC. °j� 961.00 TP 1 �0 954 SB 949.72 TC 949.83 FL / / \ \ C , ` 961.00 SW 9 \ F�®Q%� 949.22 FL SBL `v / 1 / � � 4d O 6 957 00 TW w �1 �2 X950.00 TC / 1 957.00 FG \ � O� S \ 0 951.50 T 949.50 FIL 961.00 SW 961.00 FG 959.95SW� 982 950 GRADING GENERAL NOTES 950.00 TC,, / 960.15 SW 959.45 F� 950.50 TC s� X949.50 FL / : ( , �y ,\ 959.65 FL p� O 950.00 FL h 950.35 TC / / V \ �d ❑ / / � 959.95 SW 960.88 SW 950.50 TC � 949.85 FL 0959.45 FL 950.00 FL 955.00 TW / / \ / �� 959.80 TC �� Y0�� �° 9570 / \ \ \ 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS L �/ / / \ 888.30 FL o ° a ?oo p�p IN THE FIELD REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEER '` Tv 960.25 TC / / / J'T (zoo � BEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. O 959.75 FL / /'�� �/ c rn p p 960.88 SW 961.00 SW y S2 / // \ IS,o / / \ �< < y � 954.20 TC �� g�3 / \ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS / / Sr° �\° o n . 953.70 FL WORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY ? 959.13 TC I o 96o.oasw ClSo gyp // �' COMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND J /959.00 FG /'�� 958.63 FL W� 960.05 SW / COMMENCING WORK. �/ / 961.50 TC 1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP (EA.) / 961.001- i / 959.44 FL ^. \° ` 959.95 SW / 960.00TC ` \ 959.45 FL o/ 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT SILT AND DEBRIS / 959.50 FL �� F� 959.50 TC F( mO rn 'lob 09 / 960.00 FG / ?o, 959.00 FL °go gs9 EOF-955.80 yy� / RUN-OFF DURING GRADING OPERATIONS (I.E. SILT FENCE, STRAW BALES, ETC.). / 960.70 TC 1� ` \ \ ``9S / 954.00 TC / / 953.50 FL 960.20 FL r 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH 961.10 TC 960.60 FL / 1 �� ``� s\ r GRADING PLAN, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TO F r ( F 4 , °� 959.50 TC 960.25 FG t� •, / / 960.47 TC \''0% 959.45 TC . 959.00 FL gSs 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP REMAIN. MEET EXISTING GRADES ALONG STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, AND DRIVEWAY / 959.97 FL tel° 958.95 FL gsa ENTRANCES. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENTS THAT REMAIN TO THEIR ORIGINAL IF NOT 961.00 TP , O g 58.00 TC 957.77 TC / F` F(oyo mss` 57.50 FL F(, 957.27 FL / r BETTER CONDITION. NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE 960.50 TC '66 2% F / / v960.00 FL 958.99 958.99 TC (?0 o gs / / PROJECT. \\ \ \ 96p 961.50 TC � , 956 958.49 FL / r 961.00 FL F V CENTRAL INFIL. BASIN ` I° ° r/ 5. TURF ESTABLISHMENT AREAS SHALL RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH AS MEASURED IN \ \ A a (750FL ssl.00Tc s � o EOF=958.00 F F( / PLACE OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE 880.80 FL TREATMENT VOL.= 10,236 C.F. 956.00 Tc � � ` s gs � ` (1.0% zoo � 1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP zio 961.0 / TC 957.50 FL\ ` s \ / 957.50 TC / CONTRACTOR. ALL GRADED SLOPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 5:1 SHALL BE 960.55 TC &5". 958.00 TC r957.00FL / HYDROSEEDED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETED, OR MULCHED TO HELP STABILIZE THE 0 � � \ \ \ 960.05 FL 960.50 FL 956 ` \S8 957.50 FL / \ \ 960.87 TC r / SLOPES BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. \ \ 960.37 FLS S 960.50 TC 1\9` 958.55 TC EOF=958.00 / rr \ 6( \ 960.00 FL F(0g° `` 958.05 FL �` r / 6. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE TOP OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. \ \ o / / r ELEVATION OF FLOW LINE IS 6" BELOW TOP OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. \ \ O Se F �� 9S9 ° c4 /r r EAST INFIL. BASIN \ ( ' e r / 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT, \960.90 TC N °° 858.20 Tc � � � // EOF=955.80 \ 960.40 FL 4 960.21 TC 960.07 TC 958.70 FL 'v ° 958.75 TC •�.rr m`O / TREATMENT VOL.=2,416 C.F. FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BE \95Sk FL � ^ ^ �= r DONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. \ 959.71 FL \ o 4 958.25 FLS / T rr /r IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL AS 95935 C\ / r REQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALS \ S 9 F 958.85 FL \ e� s�00 (? 959.80 TC F( o rah r/ SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT. \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ ,r(°S° \ Se 959.30 FL 1'So •• r// 3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 8. IT IS INTENDED THAT EARTHWORK (CUT VS. FILL) BALANCE ON SITE. THE CONTRACTOR 960.00 TP SHALL SUBMIT THE QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AND AMOUNT OF ANTICIPATED GRADE 958.50 TC / 3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP \ 958.00 FL / ADJUSTMENT FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF FOUR WEEKDAYS PRIOR 959.35 TC/ // TO MAKING ADJUSTMENTS. ALL GRADE ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE \� \ 958.85 FL �� / / ENGINEER. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR WORK ASSOCIATED 959\ \ \ a 959.20T\ seg \ WITH GRADING ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EARTHWORK \ \ ^ 958.70 FL OPERATIONS, STORM SEWER PIPING AND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS, CONSTRUCTION Seg N o / SURVEYING FOR ADJUSTING FEATURE LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY, SILT FENCE, ETC. \ \ 960.00 T. \\ F(0 ° �° �� �a / /r // 9. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE 5 ° AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -SEED OR RE -SOD ALL APPLICABLE 960.48 TC /r r AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE \ \� 959.98 FL T� se /r // ENGINEER. \ o / 959.74 TC 10. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE, OR OTHER 95925 TC ./ POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET \.24 FL 958.75 FL / HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS 959.43 TC / ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO 958.93 FL / - THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR /.94 PIPING OR SIMILAR) 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES, PIPING, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL NOT BE \ \ REMOVED UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. zN O v Lu N M IT �z v / ` 0 O O - o L0 WZ ♦^ °° �op N Q W � O N WH W YLu � a Q U w� .. - � w mQ � LL. O"ZJwN ZKQ Q'N w W Z -1-F V) Z:)ZZ O Q w O � LL CO O(n 0J� O~ 0006 Z>> QUW of O C)C -H WE SHEET NO. C3 W I I I Lu w �z 0 u z OLu J z U u a) Q z� V v O C)C -0 o m U SHEET NO. C3 W I I I FES 18" CMP Ele v.• 958.62 Off/ a N W \\ 7 LEGEND: �T \ SMH 4 << PROPOSED STORM SEWER �K s I PROPOSED WATER LINE s z } / * C \ \ / s > PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER v \ 7 \ s a U / s I -I PROPOSED FITTING ~ IMH 2 / \\ \ FES 36 " CMP � _ U 0 Kiev.• 932.55 s 0 40' W D w PROPOSED WATER SERVICE 0 U) LO \\ s PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE / \ U SCALE: 1" 40' EOF=945.80 NORTH INFIL. BASIN s PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE = a `- \\ 0 / TREATMENT VOL.=2,284 C.F. �\ PROPOSED FLARED END SECITON \ �\ D673 0 PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE M LU PROPOSED CATCH BASIN N 9a� \ EOF=945.80 \ \ ` ►� PROPOSED GATE VALVE & BOX 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP PROPOSED HYDRANT 944 % '/�, W o �( , 1, 9 s4j 94s 94 �\ FST\ STMH 3 v e PROPOSED CLEANOUT z 949 Qg \ B \ \ � �: O••� PROPOSED RIP RAP cM.l STMH 4 � •��•�• � g � EXTEND 8" SDR -26 SANITARY \ 6 \ U Lo O SERVICE 20 LF @ 0.50% MIN. \ N / / /00 \ CONNECT TO BUILDING. / \ O N \ ` \ sk `95.9 \ 1 CB RIM -958.70 E INV. -955.70 / 3 FES / INV.=954.50 / / / / / / / \ �2 CBMH \ � � RIM=958.75 W INV.=955.00 NE INV.=955.00' CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE S INV.=945.00 8 CBMH / \ RIM=949.50/ \W INV. =945.50 / //NJ NV.=945.50 / / •950 / 31 LF 16-0 RCP @ 1.02 / / / / / / 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / 6 STMH RIM=955.50 N INV.=951.50 / / / / 1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP EAST INFIL. BASIN EOF=955.80 TREATMENT VOL.=2,416 C.F. 3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP UTILITY GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL UTILITY RELOCATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS WORK AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND COMMENCING WORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH GRADING PLAN AND EXISTING UTILITIES, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TO REMAIN. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AS EXISTING IN THE FIELD AND AS REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEER BEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5. WATER LINE SHALL BE A MINIMUM 8.0 FEET DEPTH UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON PLANS. 6. VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING SANITARY LINE AT POINT OF CONNECTION WITH NEW SANITARY LINE PRIOR TO INSTALLING ANY NEW UTILITIES. 7. ALL CROSSING ELEVATIONS OF NEW UTILITIES & SIZES OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES ARE BASED ON ASSUMED ELEVATIONS AND SIZES PROVIDED BY THE SURVEY. 8. ALL SANITARY SERVICE PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SDR -26 PVC. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING TWO CONSECUTIVE PASSING BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS FROM THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE. 10. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY CONCRETE PAVEMENT WHICH IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED WATER, SANITARY, STORM SEWER SERVICE INSTALLATION. 11. FOR WATER SERVICE LINES #12 AWG SOLID COPPER CLAD STEEL (CCS) WIRE WITH 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) INSULATING JACKET, COLOR BLUE. 12. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER. NO DEWATERING IS EXPECTED FOR THIS SITE DUE TO SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR PAVEMENT REMOVAL, UTILITY INSTALLATION, AND REPLACEMENT AS NEEDED. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM FINAL ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 15. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE OVER 18" IN DIAMETER SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES: 16.1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 16.2. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS: 16.3. FERNCO, "CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS" OR "LARGE -DIAMETER WATERSTOPS" 16.4. PRESS -SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS" OR APPROVED EQUAL 17. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR). 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND GUTTER. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCH BASINS TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING. ' I z O U N M O m m m w 0 - 0 Lu Zw «w N Q Lu Z Z Y O (�0 U W r` Z W coQ F LL LU O"ZJ U Q W 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN z O U N M O z00 w 0 - M Ln W Zw «w N Q Lu 0�o N WH U) Ycl) a Q U W r` .. - W coQ F LL LU O"ZJ Z�Q WN Q'N LU LuZ W u) op F__N rQ1'� /c/p� V♦ > Z ?ZZ O M V L�WO loo O � J� O ~ MryJ� Z> > QUW OJ W �V �H SHEET NO. r� z Lu w �z 0 U V) O JO U o U z ILD oc O 2 5O L W 'i.- 0 U SHEET NO. r� / )e'K / N O m 755�,MH UL NORTH INFIL. BASIN EOF=945.80 \ �\ / TREATMENT VOL.=2,284 C.F. \ \\ LEGEND: N AREA CN =�oo�paPROPOSED RIP RAP - io>oo • o > BUILDING � U X 980.50 TC NEW TOP -BACK OF CURB ELEVATION 106,644 0 TOTAL WEIGHTED 261,159 83 X 980.50 FL NEW FLOW LINE OF CURB ELEVATION0 40' 0 0 6929 3173 TOTAL: X 980.50 SW NEW SIDEWALK ELEVATION 10236.5 or - LL" NORTH INFIL. BASIN 955 518 X 980.50 TP NEW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION SCALE: 1" = 40' zz z REGIONAL POND 904 Q X 980.50 TG NEW TOP OF GRAVEL ELEVATION 2160 1380 TOTAL: cCw0 i) 2284.0 X 980.50 FG NEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION EAST INFIL. BASIN 955 309 J 0 X 980.50 EX EXISTING ELEVATION W o 1106.5 ~ N 984 PROPOSED CONTOURCD 0 CO F- PROPOSED SLOPE 2416 COMBINED VOLUME E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=945.80 \ 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP \ \ \ \ /916- 9 / �b0 941 4S 946 i 949 94g \ n SBL, •950 / �4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP EAST INFIL. BASIN EOF=955.80 TREATMENT VOL.=2,416 C.F. C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / / / old i / / / / / / / L � DRAINAGE NOTES: GENERAL DESCRIPTION: THE MONTICELLO SUITES CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 -LEVEL APARTMENT WITH OUTDOOR AND INTERIOR PARKING. THE SITE IS 6.0 ACRES. THERE IS 107,800 S.F. OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT AND THE BUILDING IS AROUND 46,715 S.F. SITE ENTRANCES ARE LOCATED ON 7TH STREET WEST AND ELM STREET. SOILS AND INFILTRATION ACCORDING TO THE WEB SOIL SURVEY, THE EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS ON THE SITE IS A 20 INCH LAYER OF SANDY LOAM WITH GRAVELLY COARSE SAND. WITH EXCAVATING THE TOP LAYER OF SOIL, THE BASINS WILL INFILTRATE INTO THE COARSE SAND (HSG) A WITH AN ASSUMED INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR. RATE CONTROL A REGIONAL POND HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR 7TH STREET WEST AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE EXISTING OUTLET B WAS DESIGNED TO UTILIZE A CN OF 89. THE FOLLOWING CURVE NUMBERS AND AREAS WERE USED TO VERIFY THE PROPOSED CN IS LESS THAN THE PREVIOUS CN DESIGN OF 89. TYPE AREA CN PAVEMENT 107,800 98 BUILDING 46,715 98 GRASS/PERVIOUS 106,644 61 TOTAL WEIGHTED 261,159 83 ALL STORM WATER IS DIRECTED TO THE STORM SEWER WITHIN 7TH STREET WEST TO OUTFLOW TO THE REGIONAL POND. VOLUME RETENTION THREE INFILTRATION BASINS ARE PROPOSED ON SITE TO PROVIDE VOLUME CONTROL FOR A 1.1 INCH STORM. WITH 14,163 S.F. OF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, 14,163 C.F. (525 C.Y.) OF VOLUME IS REQUIRED TO BE HELD WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASINS. THE COMBINED VOLUME OF THE BASINS TO THE INITIAL OUTLET IS 14,936.5 C.F. (553 C.Y.) THE FOLLOWING TABLE ADDS TOGETHER THE VOLUMES OF THE BASINS. WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. N O N C) 0 z U` 0 O O L0 N O M N CONTOUR AREA VOLUME BETWEEN CENTRAL INFIL. BASIN 955 1356 0 0 956 3504 2430 W 957 5763 4633.5 Cf) 957.5 6929 3173 TOTAL: LLI 10236.5 or - LL" NORTH INFIL. BASIN 955 518 O"z zz 956 1290 904 00 Cf)V♦ 956.8 2160 1380 TOTAL: cCw0 i) 2284.0 Lu EAST INFIL. BASIN 955 309 J 0 0 0 956 1904 1106.5 956.5 3334 1309.5 TOTAL: 2416 COMBINED VOLUME 14936.5 WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. N O N C) 0 z U` 0 O O L0 N O M N zN ' I �: N M V ♦ z 0 0 m M LO'zt W m z00 �o? N Q Lu Cf) ofco N LU W H m 0 LLI or - LL" .. D'Q w �_ U) X �,L w O"z zz w" �N Y -i O 00 Cf)V♦ //)� =0Z oN cCw0 i) [LA coF- Lu 0_j� z>> �Uw of W �V J 0 0 0 0 U LL zN O U N M V ♦ z 0 0 M LO'zt W z00 �o? N Q Lu Cf) ofco N LU W H wY� or - LL" .. D'Q w �_ U) X �,L w O"z Z(YQJ w" �N QC� } w F- w w Z 00 Cf)V♦ //)� =0Z oN cCw0 i) [LA coF- MO 0_j� z>> �Uw OJ W �V �� () V) W LU ~z Q O JO Lu U U_ V z� O 2m SHEET NO. z Q J 1 z W U +-+ W toz 0 a� oc U Lu o Q o U V) s SMH 3 s T Is, 0 FES 18 CMP / El e v.• 958.62 1 / kf IK w /� y y ROCK CONSTRUCTION IT s NORTH INFIL. BASIN EOE=945.80 �\ \ TREATMENT VOL.=2,284 C.F. � F / SF 240 S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET _ ?/// ol / REGIONAL POND I / T UL K �— s s � � �\ s� � s \ \ FES 36" CMP STMH \\ \Elev.• 932.55 D67F F=945.80 '•' C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP \_STMH 3 � INSTALL 432 LF \ 6 STMH 4 \ OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE SMH 7 / / 9S2 950 s / 95119 \ � / / / -ss / /4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / / / / —1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP -EAST INFIL. BASIN EOF=955.80 TREATMENT VOL.=2,416 C.F. S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET -INSTALL 20 LF OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOG C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP --3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP INSTALL 20 LF OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOG wj_w"« INSTALL LF �/'/ / // OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE DIN \L LEGEND: ASF d°ice 984 0 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N) GRADING LIMITS AND PROPOSED TEMPORARY SILT FENCE FIBER -LOG ROLLS PROPOSED RIP RAP PROPOSED CONTOUR EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER- HIGH FLOW EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 0 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE CONSTRUCTION/GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. 2. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S STORM WATER PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 3. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR GRADING OPERATIONS AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE PERMIT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY MEASURABLE RAINSTORM. DAMAGED SILT FENCE OR OTHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR PRACTICES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DEVICES SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. 5. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION. 6. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND THE MPCA. 7. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE DISTURBANCE OF ANY AREAS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL TRIBUTARY DISTURBED AREAS ARE RESTORED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING SILT FENCE AND BALES, UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT VEGETATION IN SAID AREAS. 9. ALL SOILS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER OFF-SITE AREA SHALL BE REMOVED DAILY. 10. THE SITE SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES FOR THE PROJECT MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION. 11. ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED AND VEGETATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE TO MN/DOT 2575. 12. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITH MN/DOT SEED MIX, MULCHED, FERTILIZED & DISK ANCHORED, PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: STANDARD SEED MIX 25-131: 220 LB/AC. INFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX 33-261: 35 LB/AC. FERTILIZER 22-5-10: 350 LB/AC. MULCH TYPE 3: 2 TONS/AC. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BMP'S SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON PLANS DURING PHASING ON PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH MPCA, CITY INSPECTOR AND DEVELOPER REQUEST. APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES • SILT FENCE: 3,428 LF • BIOLOG: 80 LF • ROCK CONSTRUCTION: 1 EACH • INLET PROTECTION: 12 EACH • EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N): 290 S.Y. • RIP RAP (CLASS 2) 18 C.Y. Z } O � �° U 0 (n W Lu U) 0 �2 U) z 0 of Z N � p o ° o O Lu co zN I z O v N M O m V) m U) z w C) 0 �z m 0 W Q op zop N Q Z Z Y - O U U > cU r� mX Z OfQ W H LL O U Q W 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN z O v N M O V) ate+ U) z w C) 0 �z M Ln W � Q op zop N Q N WH U) Ycl) a a U > cU r� mX .� OfQ W H LL O "ZwQ ZJ WN of wwz W c~/)� ~ rQ1'� /c/p� V♦ > Z �ZZ � �M V W 0 LL r.p O(n OJ� Oti MryJ� Z > > QUW OJ W �V �H SHEET NO. a J a— _j O z 0 O V) W z V) ate+ Lu w �z 0 Q �--+ V) O CSA JO U o U U z(D Oor- � m `- U SHEET NO. a J a— _j O z 0 O V) W STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE: GENERAL INFORMATION THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT NO. MN R1000001 FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PROJECT NAME: MONTICELLO SUITES LOCATION: ELM ST & 7TH ST W, MONTICELLO MN SHERBURNE COUNTY LAT/LONG: 45.301553, -93.809709 DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 -STORY APARTMENT BUILDING, GARAGE, ASPHALT PARKING, GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION, AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. PROJECT CONTACTS PAT BRIGGS AND THE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP PREPARATION: 5.97 SWPPP PREPARER: CHRISTOPHER DAHN 0.00 -BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES TRAINING: ENGINEER AND SWPPP DESIGNER (EXP 2025) ADDRESS: 13076 FIRST STREET 3.55 BECKER, MN 53308 TELEPHONE: 763-262-8822 EMAIL; CDAHN@BOGART-PEDERSON,COM OWNER: °° 2 N OWNER CONTACT: PAT BRIGGS ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 719, BIG LAKE, MN 55309 TELEPHONE: (612)-919-1561 EMAIL; PAT@THEBRIGGSCOMPANIES.COM CONTRACTOR (TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR): BUSINESS NAME Z OWNER NAME Y MAILING ADDRESS w N �N CITY w w z TELEPHONE Z EMAIL � CONTACT NAME p LLJ MAILING ADDRESS 0' CITY J TELEPHONE 0 EMAIL 0 LL ESTIMATED DATES OF CONSTRUCTION: START DATE _/ / (TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR) COMPLETION DATE _/ / (TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR) PERMANENT STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS SEE THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION. CONTACT BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES FOR REPORT. PROPOSED FLOW RATE IS LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTING THE WATER NORTH TO A REGIONAL POND PREVIOUSLY SIZED. VOLUME CONTROL IS PROVIDED THROUGH 3 INFILTRATION BASINS ON SITE TO CONTAIN 1.1 INCHES OF RAINFALL OVER THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. SOIL GROUP: A/B DESCRIPTION OF EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITY: EROSION CONTROL CONSISTS OF SILT FENCE PERIMETER CONTROL, TURF ESTABLISHMENT THROUGH SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLACEMENT. CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 5.97 ACRES PRE -CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.00 ACRES POST CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.55 ACRES NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.55 ACRES RECEIVING WATERS: STORM WATER FROM THIS SITE WILL BE DISCHARGED TO THE CITY STORM SEWER WHICH IS DISCHARGED INTO A REGIONAL POND. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THE PLAN SHEETS OF THIS PLAN SET INDICATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: • THE PROJECT LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. • LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. • LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., BUFFER ZONES, WETLANDS, ETC.). • STEEP SLOPE LOCATIONS. • LOCATIONS OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT. • THE DETAIL SHEETS INDICATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT. • IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DOWN GRADIENT SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOG INSTALLATIONS ARE TO BE INPLACE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. TOPSOIL IS TO BE WINDROWED ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND PLACED AS SLOPE DRESSING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE GRADING OPERATIONS, AS THE GRADING OPERATIONS PROCEED. TOPSOIL PLACEMENT ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES THOUGH THE WETLANDS AREA IS TO BE SPREAD BY A LOW IMPACT CRAWLER TRACTOR OPERATING UP AND DOWN THE SLOPES SO AS TO PROVIDE TRACK PRINTS PARALLEL WITH THE CONTOURS. INSTALLATION OF MN/DOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES ADJACENT THE WETLANDS AREA. ALL TEMPORARY SOILS STOCKPILES WILL REQUIRE AN EFFECTIVE MEANS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL SUCH AS AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET COVERING OR SILT FENCE INSTALLATION ALONG THE TOE OF SLOPE. ALL COMPLETED SWALES SLOPES AND BOTTOMS NOT DRAINING TOWARDS WETLAND AREAS ARE TO BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION WILL BE REQUIRED IN AREAS WHERE GRADING OPERATIONS ARE SUSPENDED OR CEASED FOR A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS OR GREATER. A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE PROJECT ENTRANCE ON ELM STREET. STREET SWEEPING OF THE PAVED SURFACES WILL BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. TIMING OF EROSION CONTROL: SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOGS WILL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. RIPRAP AND FILTER BLANKET WILL BE PLACED AT THE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE OUTLET PLACEMENT THE CONTRACTOR MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION WHEREVER CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT OCCUR FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 7 DAYS. STABILIZATION WORK MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN 200 FT OF A PUBLIC WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETING CONSTRUCTION DURING PERIODS OF "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" FOR TIME PERIODS DECLARED BY THE DNR. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DISTURBED AREA UNTIL VEGETATION IN ESTABLISHED ONCE VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE SILT FENCE AND ANY OTHER TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL THAT IS NOT BIODEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED. STREET SWEEPING TO BE PROVIDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER. THE CITY REQUIRES STREET SWEEPING TO OCCUR WITHIN 8 HOURS OF NOTICE FROM THE CITY. APPLYING MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE STABILIZATION IN ANY PART OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE. BLANKETS OR OTHER APPROVED, BY THE ENGINEER, METHOD SHALL BE USED. u�y�xars.��r_vu>t•ranrrana►�y�_zar►•irri� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AND SCHEDULING THE WORK OF ALL OPERATIONS, INCLUDING SUBCONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES, SUCH THAT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE FULLY EXECUTED FOR EACH OPERATION AND IN A TIMELY MANNER OVER THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. OPERATORS HAVE DAILY ACCESS TO THE PROJECT SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION UNTIL THE ENTIRE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND N.O.T HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A TRAINED INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON THE PROJECT. THAT INDIVIDUAL IS TO BE IDENTIFIED AT THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND LISTED IN THE MINUTES THEREOF. THE APPOINTED INDIVIDUAL IS TO PERFORM A ROUTINE INSPECTION OF THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. A INSPECTION FORM WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ARE TO BE NOTED ON THE INSPECTION FORM AND CORRECTED BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY. PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED WHEN THEY ARE NO LONGER EFFECTIVE OR WHEN THE SEDIMENT REACHES ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. TRAINING DOCUMENTATION: SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, REVISING, AMENDING, AND INSPECTING (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR) NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OVERSEEING & INSPECTING DATE OF TRAINING NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING CONTENT OF TRAINING TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING BMP INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR) NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OVERSEEING & INSPECTING DATE OF TRAINING NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING CONTENT OF TRAINING TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING POLLUTION PREVENTION FERTILIZERS ARE TO BE APPLIED ONLY IN THE AMOUNTS AS SPECIFIED AND WORKED INTO THE SOIL TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO STORMWATER RUNOFF. ONSITE REFUELING OPERATIONS ARE TO BE CONDUCTED WITH CARE. ANY INADVERTENT SPILLAGE OF FUEL OR CHEMICALS IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS MAJOR SPILLS ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE MPCA 24 HOUR NOTIFICATION NETWORK AT 800 422 0798. ALL VEHICLES ON-SITE ARE TO BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND SUBJECT TO ROUTINE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EFFORTS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF LEAKAGE AND OR SPILLS. l.�:ir_� 3r�ya�irr_va-�►��c��r:�yzyurri�y_v��r.>t 3��:z.�•a.�az.�r�yrr�a�u>taairiaz.��ra �sa���a:��-� �_�y CONCRETE BATCH TRUCKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DISCHARGE DRUM AND CHUTE WASHOUT DIRECTLY ON THE GROUND. A PORTABLE WASHOUT RECEPTACLE IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE LOCATION AS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. FINAL STABILIZATION FINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS WHEN 70 PERCENT OF THE PERVIOUS AREA IS COVERED WITH UNIFORM, PERMANENT VEGETATION. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND THE NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT PLAN DESCRIPTION TITLE LOCATION EROSION CONTROL DETAILS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C8 -C9 EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONS EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONS C6 24 HOUR MPCA EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 651-649-5451 800-422-0798 ESTIMATED QUANTITIES THE FOLLOWINGUIRED FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL UANITITES IS AN ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY AMOUNT REQUIRED Q BMP'S AT THE START OF THE PROJECT. THIS ESTIMATE IS PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ANY ADDITIONAL AND/OR REPLACEMENT BMP'S QUANTITIES WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY QUANTITIES AT START OF PROJECT: ITEM UNIT ESTIMATED INITIAL QUANTITY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT EA 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER EA 12 TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT EA 1 TEMPORARY PUMP SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE EA 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS LF 80 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 3,428 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N) SY 290 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. PREVENTION OF SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, AND STORM AND SANITARY SEWERS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 1.02 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM. MINNESOTA PERMIT NO: MN R100001. 1.03 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. B. DO NOT BEGIN CLEARING, GRADING, OR OTHER WORK INVOLVING DISTURBANCE OF GROUND SURFACE COVER UNTIL APPLICABLE PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED; FURNISH ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED TO OBTAIN APPLICABLE PERMITS. 1. OBTAIN AND PAY FOR PERMITS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. C. TIMING: PUT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IN PLACE PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF SURFACE COVER AND BEFORE PRECIPITATION OCCURS. D. EROSION OFF SITE: PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL AND DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT ON OTHER PROPERTIES CAUSED BY WATER LEAVING THE PROJECT SITE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT. 1. PREVENT TRACKING OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC ROADS OUTSIDE SITE. 2. PREVENT MUD AND SEDIMENT FROM FLOWING ONTO PAVEMENTS. E. SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF SITE: PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF THE PROJECT SITE, INCLUDING RIVERS, STREAMS, LAKES, PONDS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, STORM SEWERS, AND SANITARY SEWERS. 1. IF SEDIMENTATION OCCURS, INSTALL OR CORRECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY AT NO COST TO OWNER; REMOVE DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS; COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. F. MAINTENANCE: MAINTAIN TEMPORARY PREVENTIVE MEASURES UNTIL PERMANENT MEASURES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE: WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE GEOTEXTILE RESISTANT TO COMMON SOIL CHEMICALS, MILDEW, AND INSECTS; NON -BIODEGRADABLE; IN LONGEST LENGTHS POSSIBLE; FABRIC INCLUDING SEAMS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM AVERAGE ROLL LENGTHS: 1. AVERAGE OPENING SIZE: 20 U.S. STD. SIEVE, MAXIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4751. 2. PERMITTIVITY: 0.05 SEC^ -1, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4491. 3. ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANCE: RETAINING AT LEAST 70 PERCENT OF TENSILE STRENGTH, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4355/D4355M AFTER 500 HOURS EXPOSURE. 4. TENSILE STRENGTH: 100 LB -F, MINIMUM, IN CROSS -MACHINE DIRECTION; 124 LB -F, MINIMUM, IN MACHINE DIRECTION; WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632. 5. ELONGATION: 15 TO 30 PERCENT, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632. 6. TEAR STRENGTH: 55 LB -F, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4533. 7. COLOR: MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD, WITH EMBEDMENT AND FASTENER LINES PREPRINTED. 8. SILT FENCE POSTS: ONE OF THE FOLLOWING, MINIMUM 5 FEET LONG: a. STEEL U- OR T -SECTION, WITH MINIMUM MASS OF 1.33 LB PER LINEAR FOOT. b. SOFTWOOD, 4 BY 4 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION. C. HARDWOOD, 2 BY 2 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: FILTER LOGS SHALL CONSIST OF TYPE WOOD FIBER BIOROLLS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPEC. 3897. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. SHALL BE SILTSOXX PERIMETER CONTROL BY FILTREXX, INC., OR EQUAL. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. DROP-IN SEDIMENT FILTER UNIT THAT INSERTS INTO THE INLET. 1) SHALL BE FLEXSTORM PURE: PERMANENT INLET FILTER BY ADS, INC., OR EQUAL. (a)PROVIDE CURB OPENING PROTECTION FOR EXISTING INLETS WITH CURB OPENINGS. D. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 1. ROCK SHALL BE CLEAN 1 TO 2 INCH WASHED ROCK. E. TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 1) SHALL CONSIST OF A UNIFORM WEB OF INTERLOCKING STRAW OR WOOD FIBERS SANDWICHED BETWEEN AN ATTACHED TOP AND BOTTOM LAYER OF NET BACKING. 2) THE NETTING SHALL BE BIODEGRADABLE CONTAINING SUFFICIENT UV STABILIZATION FOR BREAKDOWN TO OCCUR WITHIN A NORMAL GROWING SEASON. 3) STAPLES USED TO ANCHOR THE BLANKETS SHALL BE U -SHAPED, 11 GAUGE OR HEAVIER STEEL WIRE HAVING A SPAN WIDTH OF 1 INCH AND A LENGTH OF 8 INCHES OR MORE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM AFTER BENDING. 4) THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE: (a)GEO-SYNTHETICS, INC., - LANDLOK 52. (b)NORTH AMERICAN GREEN - S150. (c)OR EQUAL. b. BONDED FIBER MATRIX. 1) THE FIBERS SHALL BE COMPOSED OF 100% WOOD OR WOOD BY-PRODUCTS. A MINIMUM OF 25% OF THE FIBERS SHALL AVERAGE 10.16 MM (0.4 INCHES) IN LENGTH AND 50% OR MORE SHALL BE RETAINED ON A CLARK FIBER CLASSIFIER 24 MESH SCREEN. FIBERS SHALL BE COLORED WITH A WATER SOLUBLE, NON-TOXIC DYE, TO AID IN UNIFORM APPLICATION OVER THE SITE. 2) THE BINDER SHALL BE A HYDRO COLLOID BASED (GUAR GUM) WITH ADDED SLOW-RELEASE AND AGRICULTURAL BASED FERTILIZERS. THE BINDER SHALL NOT DISSOLVE OR DISPERSE UPON REWETTING. 3) THE BFM SLURRY SHALL DRY TO FORM A CRUST APPROXIMATELY 3-6 MM (1/8 TO 1/4 INCHES) THICK ADHERING TO THE SOIL SURFACE. 4) THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE MATRIX SHALL BE 12% +/- 3% BY WEIGHT. 5) THE MATRIX SHALL CONSIST OF MATERIALS THAT ARE 100% BIODEGRADABLE AND 100% BENEFICIAL TO PLANT LIFE. 6) THE MATRIX SHALL PROVIDE 100% CONTINUOUS COVERAGE AND SHALL HAVE NO HOLES GREATER THAN 1MM IN SIZE. 7) THE HYDRATED MIXTURE DENSITY SHALL BE APPROXIMATED BY A SLUMP TEST PRIOR TO APPLICATION. 8) THE BFM MULCH: WATER RATIO SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. THE MINIMUM BFM MULCH TO WATER RATIO IS 50LBS BFM MULCH AND 100 GALLONS WATER. THE WATER RATE WILL VARY BETWEEN 100 GALLONS AND 125 GALLONS PER 50LBS, DEPENDING ON WHICH OF THE PRODUCTS IS USED. 9) THE BONDED FIBER MATRIX MULCH PRODUCTS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE. (a)ECOAEGIS - MANUFACTURED BY CANFOR. (b)SOIL GUARD - MANUFACTURED BY MAT, INC. (c)CONWED 3000 - MANUFACTURED BY CONWED FIBERS, INC. F. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEWN INTO A BAG USING A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE AND HIGH STRENGTH THREAD. a. SEAMS SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE WIDTH STRENGTH OF 60LB/INCH AS PER ASTM D4883 AND MEET OR EXCEED THE FOLLOWING. 1) GRAB TENSILE OF 205 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4632. 2) PUNCTURE OF 110 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4833. 3) FLOW RATE OF 95 GAL/MIN/SF AS PER ASTM D 4491. 4) PERMITTIVITY OF 1.5 SEC -1 AS PER ASTM D 4491. 5) MULLEN BURST STRENGTH OF 350 PSI AS PER ASTM D 3786. 6) AOS% OF 80% US SIEVE AS PER ASTM D 4751. 2. SPOUT LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A 4 INCH DISCHARGE HOSE WITH STRAP TO TIE UNIT CLOSED. 3. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. DIRTBAG. 1) ACF ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2831 CARDWELL ROAD, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23234, 800-448-3636. b. DANDY DEWATERING BAG. 1) DANDY PRODUCTS, INC., P.O. BOX 1980, WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43086, 800-591-2284. c. OR EQUAL. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 PREPARATION A. SCHEDULE WORK SO THAT SOIL SURFACES ARE LEFT EXPOSED FOR THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF TIME. B. THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OPERATOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER PERMIT NO. MN R100001. C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AND SIGN THE NOTICE OF INTENT, OBTAIN THE OWNER'S SIGNATURE, AND SUBMIT TO THE MPCA. 1. PROVIDE A SIGNED COPY TO THE OWNER. 3.03 INSTALLATION A. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 1. THE ROCK AREA SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES DEEP, EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE EGRESS AREA AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 50FT LONG, HOWEVER, LONGER ENTRANCES MAY BE REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY CLEAN THE TIRES. 2. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF MUD FROM THE UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE ROCK. B. TEMPORARY SILT FENCES: 1. STORE AND HANDLE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4873. 2. USE NOMINAL 30 INCH HIGH BARRIERS, MINIMUM 60 INCH LONG POSTS SPACED AT 6 FEET MAXIMUM SPACING. 3. EMBED BOTTOM OF FABRIC IN A TRENCH ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE, WITH 6 INCHES OF FABRIC LAID FLAT ON BOTTOM OF TRENCH FACING UPSLOPE; BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT. 4. MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT. a. STEEL POST = 24 INCHES, MINIMUM. b. WOOD POST = 18 INCHES, MINIMUM. 5. DO NOT SPLICE FABRIC WIDTH; MINIMIZE SPLICES IN FABRIC LENGTH; SPLICE AT POST ONLY, OVERLAPPING AT LEAST 18 INCHES, WITH EXTRA POST. 6. FASTEN FABRIC TO WOOD POSTS USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: a. FOUR NAILS PER POST WITH 3/4 INCH DIAMETER FLAT OR BUTTON HEAD, 1 INCH LONG, AND 14 GAGE, 0.083 INCH SHANK DIAMETER. b. FIVE STAPLES PER POST WITH AT LEAST 17 GAGE, 0.0453 INCH WIRE, 3/4 INCH CROWN WIDTH AND 1/2 INCH LONG LEGS. 7. FASTEN FABRIC TO STEEL POSTS USING WIRE, NYLON CORD, OR INTEGRAL POCKETS. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: 1. PERIMETER CONTROL SHOULD BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO THE BASE OF THE SLOPE OR OTHER DISTURBED AREA. 2. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE PERIMETER CONTROL ON 10 FT CENTERS, USING 2 IN BY 2 IN BY 3 FT WOODEN STAKES. IN THE EVENT STAKING IS NOT POSSIBLE, I.E., WHEN PERIMETER CONTROL IS USED ON PAVEMENT, HEAVY CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL BE USED BEHIND THE PERIMETER CONTROL TO HELP STABILIZE DURING RAIN EVENTS. D. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTERS. 1. DROP-IN SEDIMENT TRAP. a. PLACE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. E. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. F. TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 1. PLACE AT ANY AND ALL FINISH SLOPES THAT ARE STEEPER THAN 10H:1 V. 2. SEED AND FERTILIZE PER SPECIFICATION 32 9219 PRIOR TO INSTALLING TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 3. BONDED FIBER MATRIX. a. INSTALL THE BFM AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM GUIDELINES. 1) THE BFM SHALL BE APPLIED WITH HYDRAULIC SPRAY EQUIPMENT BY A MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFIED APPLICATOR. 2) APPLICATION SHALL BE DONE AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PROJECTED RAINFALL TO ALLOW THE BFM MULCH ADEQUATE TIME TO DRY. 3) THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN TWO STAGES (ONE-HALF RATE) WITH AMPLE TIME TO DEWATER THE FIRST APPLICATION. 4) THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED FROM AT LEAST TWO ALTERNATE DIRECTIONS, PREFERABLY 90 DEGREES APART, IF POSSIBLE, TO ENSURE ALL SOIL FACES ARE COVERED. 5) THE INSTALLATION RATE OF THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE 3500 LBS PER ACRE, MINIMUM AND 100% COVERAGE. 4. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. a. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 3.04 MAINTENANCE A. INSPECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES WEEKLY, WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE END OF ANY STORM THAT PRODUCES 0.5 INCHES OR MORE RAINFALL AT THE PROJECT SITE, AND DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. B. REPAIR DEFICIENCIES IMMEDIATELY. C. TEMPORARY SILT FENCES: 1. PROMPTLY REPLACE FABRIC THAT DETERIORATES UNLESS NEED FOR FENCE HAS PASSED. 2. REMOVE SILT DEPOSITS THAT EXCEED ONE-THIRD OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. 3. REPAIR FENCES THAT ARE UNDERCUT BY RUNOFF OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED, WHETHER BY RUNOFF OR OTHER CAUSES. D. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT. 1. PERIODIC ADDITION OF ROCK, OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF PAD SHALL BE PROVIDED AS VOIDS BECOME FILLED WITH SOIL. E. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. REPLACE THE UNIT WHEN 1/2 FULL OF SEDIMENT OR WHEN SEDIMENT HAS REDUCED THE FLOW RATE OF THE PUMP DISCHARGE TO AN IMPRACTICAL RATE. F. PLACE SEDIMENT IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS ON SITE; DO NOT REMOVE FROM SITE. 3.05 CLEANUP A. REMOVE TEMPORARY MEASURE AFTER PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. B. WHERE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY MEASURES WOULD LEAVE EXPOSED SOIL, SHAPE SURFACE TO AN ACCEPTABLE GRADE AND FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT GROUND SURFACES. END OF SECTION MISSISSIPPI RIVER (IMPAIRED WATER) SITE LOCATION 1 MILE RADIUS IMPAIRED WATERS MAP RI . 7.,r qf. hAarttic�ge r nµntry [I uh f3ialr COLirse Rd 0.5 MI r - O�"•s - e� �L a �tiapfiaii AVE Brldpvlew k.,: Morlticello Z >_O F- a U E O 0 o U) w Lu D 0 U) U) U) C� Z_ 0 w N � o Q N 0 0 00 0 WO IY Z ' M 2 2 C, 0 O N o :2U a 0 co o 0 co zN Lu V) w O v N M IT Z O m 00 o 0 - co Loj- �A WZ °° 2 N co m 0 Lu W Yco a QU w� .� - Z Z Y - O w N �N U w w z U) op ~ Z >�ZJw Z�M?Z0 � V p LLJ Q w 0' 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN Lu V) w O v N M IT Z O ♦♦^^ z 00 o 0 - co Loj- �A WZ °° 2 N Q W �o N W H W Yco a QU w� .� - Of w mQ F LL O Z J zw< w N �N U) w w z U) op ~ rQ1'� V) >�ZJw Z�M?Z0 � V "nwo0� O N� I..I. "~ ryV >O Z>QM OHJ O UW SHEET NO. C7 Lu a z V) Lu V) w z ate+ Z O Q �--+ V) t1A - J p w U O U a) T z� O N� I..I. SO G co O U SHEET NO. C7 Lu a z V) Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY Or CA -25 Rlprap Bedding g ,ss ,; Geotextile fabric Original grade HORNTAL °. _ IZO 0 0 0 o Z CONCRETE CURB LD >- (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) AND GUTTER SECTION B -B U REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION (not to scale) O Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates W o DIVIDER PLATE 3"R ° 1 2 ~ 1 y / ° Q Cn 3"R Q SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT 3 6" 13 1/2 ~ EXPANSION d JOINTS Original Cn U STREET CSLOPE 3R4" Fr EXPANSION Geotextile fabric SECTION A -A grade Z - BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT - INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT ,_ AIMIN" "�_-_ JOINTS 6,A B B (not to scale) of o TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND LINE" 7" ,, ` _ ` / m ° a °Q a ° a° ° 5' NOTED. GhannelZe runoff t0 Sediment Sediment Trapping Device °° a a ° trapping device w N - HORIZONTAL / �� , °a ° ° ° ° a I � _ ` TRACER WIRE SPLICE LINE / MNDOT SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H °° a ° ° Q ICONCRETE -- CURB BOX STANDPIPE OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 P I PERMITTED, THE FORM GUTTERSLOE SE 0 4 4 o.0 7 CU YDS /LIN FT (6612) MAY BE TILTED 8612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 21.1 FT CU. YDS. B612 T CONCRETE 0 BE EXPANSION EXPANSION POURED INTEGRALLY LA M CD i O I IWITH COPPER STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE 12' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 CURB JOINTS JOINTS -CLAD TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY I DIVIDER PLATE 3"R W Z POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKETPOLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE I TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CIN CONTRACT 1 6 1/2 " �C Cl) � -) � _j o CONTRACT I 3"R 3� 13 1 2 6~ / PLAN j �O N SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT OR �' / o / Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates CD U Q o co LU 0 — — - 1" COPPER WATERMAIN SLOPE 3/4"/FT / A A 66 co COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY 2" MIN 2 7" / \� / o ) F B o O N POLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT i B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER Q / o o E E o / o 0 0 0 0 0 i } m SANITARY SERVICE O MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER 2" HORIZONTAL LINE / 1g VARIAB LE " �/4 PER /MIN " �. F?—�� 4 l 0 � / �c o 0 0 o Q / o 00 0 6i W J _ Z Y LL' z LLI � U MNDOT © SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0582 CU YDS / LIN FT (B618) 7" MIN. 7" �_ g L ��a��� �� _ - W o o �o 0 3 o o I— (n Q W (D W Q Q Q (� Q w MAY BE TILTED 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 17.2 Fr / CU.YDS. (6618) o o 12~ CD 3/4 " / PER FT 3~ WIDTH VARIES 1 5' MIN. 18" z 0 24' min. B " X / Slope away from 1/2 R 1/2 R 3~ 3' 7" , o~ SECTION 13-13SECTION A—A w , highway HORIZONTAL 50 J LINE ° min. - Match or Right of Way 2'- 0" Existing MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Grade PLAN =moi Title: Tracer Wire Standard Plate Library Developments) Title: Concrete Curb & Gutter Standard Plate Library for Streets Title: Commercial Driveway Standard Plate Library Entrance Title: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance O Q O Monticello City Of Date:Plate No. Cit of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 City Of Monticello iCellO Date: Plate No. 03-05 � City Of Monticello Date: Plate No.03-08 06-14 3005 - -- -- 5005 - 008 -_ 6 002 Revised:03-15 Revised: 03-15 � - _- Revised: 03-15 i Revsed: 03-15 zN M O U N O C/ ` M 0 �� W ZCO �C? N Q LU of N WH W Y�C'o QU W~ CO OU W� O"zJ WN Z�Q N ' EXIST NG CURB W W Z U)� Z W I-� OVERFLOW IS %z OF ''^^ � HOZ �N THE CURB BOX HEIGHT CD V♦ C/) LL LL(D Of J (DF_ z�i NO PARKING SIGN MODIFIED) R7 -81M 121Nx18IN 181N - - WHITE ON BLUE ON BLUE , R7-8bP 121Nx6IN WHITE ON BLUE 60" GROUND LINE r—FINISHED GROUND LINE SITE ACCESSIBLE SIGN 3/81N DIA. BOLT WITH WASHER & LOCKWASHER NOTE: 1. ALL POSTS AND ANCHORS SHALL BE 12 GAUGE WITH HOLES ON ALL FOUR SIDES 2. LEAVE 1 TO 2 HOLES EXPOSED ABOVE FINISHED GROUND LINE FOR CONNECTIONS OF POST TO ANCHOR 3. SIGNS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 1. THE SEDIMENT LOGS SHALL BE TRENCHED 4" INTO THE GROUND AND SHALL BE STAKED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS OR 2"X 2" WOOD STAKES. 2. SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF LOGS. STAKED AND ENTRENCHED 10" DIA. SEDIMENT LOG FILTERED RUNOFF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET EDIMENT-LADEN RUNOFF COMPACTED SOIL TO PREVENT PIPING SEDIMENT LOG INSTALLATION PEX-"SILT STOP" FABRIC PROPOSED EMBANKMENT SILT FENCE DETAIL (NTS) COMPACTED SUBGRADE EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF 4" CONCRETE 8" DIA. REINFORCING STEEL SPACED AT 181N ON CENTER EACH WAY d / , d d e e °> G o 2 A a 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE SIDEWALK N.T.S. NOTE: SEE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON LOCATION OF INLET STRUCTURES, EMERGENCY OVERFLOW, ELEVATIONS, ETC. 12" CONTROL BLANKET (STRAW, CATEGORY 3N) FLARED END SECTION (PER UTILITY PLAN) EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF COMPACTED SUBGRADE SEEDING WITH SEED MIX 33-261 (35 LB/AC) 4" OF TOPSOIL UNCOMPACTED SUBGRADE 2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE \8\ CLASS AGGREGATE \ \ E BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION N.T.S. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (PER GRADING PLAN) SLOPE PER GRADING 5' MIN. \ —TACK COAT 12" RIP RAP (PER GRADING PLAN) I SITE SIGNAGE I TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES I INFILTRATION BASIN I N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. 6" PVC DRAINTILE 6" PVC WYE. CONNECT CONNECTION 3>_0>, DRAINTILE TO DIRECT LINE NO BENDS GREATER AND CAP WYE OPENING TO THAN 45° SHALL BE ALLOW FUTURE CONNECTION ALLOWEDLq FACE OF CURB DIRECTION OF FLOW NOTE: Lj VANE GRATE SHOWN CATCHBASIN CASTING NEENAH R3067V OR EQUAL WITH VANE GRATE, 3" RADIUS CURB BOX. INSTALL R3290A CASTING IN DRIVEWAYS AND VALLEY GUTTERS. INSTALL R3067VB FOR LOW POINTS. MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH RING. 1 RING WITH MORTAR = 0.2'. 6" CONCRETE COLLAR REQUIRED AROUND THE CASTING AND ALL ADJUSTMENT RINGS. 6" PVC DRAINTILE CONNECTION.) T ONLY PLASTIC SHIMS SHALL BE ALLOWED IF NEEDED. [ MORTAR SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED UNDERGROUND UTILITY MORTAR WHICH MEETS OR EXCEEDS ASTM C270 AND ASTM C387. DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE OUTSIDE AND THE INSIDE. r1 I A K I 24" x 36" PRECAST o AF O 0 o SECTION ZX 3' CATCH BASIN N.T.S. 0 I N NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ALLOWED. - GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW GUTTER GRADE. 10' TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. VARIABLE TOP OF CURB z 6 1/2" 5" MIN 3"GROUT P) MINIMUM 0 VARI 12"- � 2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKES @ 4' —16" O C) O O.C. 0 ° O 01 1/21N X 1 1/21N v / ` 4'-0" MIN. a a Qa d � ° p SIGN POST m CONCRETE INLET BACK of CURB AND RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET MAY VARY WITH SITE ENTRAINED (5% TO 8.5% BY VOLUME). MANUFACTURED AND DESIGNED 10' MINIMUM O CONDITIONS. TO ASTM C858. Q W - O FINISHED GROUND LINE Z Y BACKFILL (� 7\777 �\ INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE ,\ INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE DISSIPATOR. STANDARD HOOK. //-\ /771/\ �/. � LU 3. FIBERGLASS TOP GRATE (32 LBS, 1-1/2" THICK) - 1,760 LB 0-i BURY BOTTOM 1 3/41Nx 1 3/41N EXISTING GROUND �� 2 / 6" OF FABRIC ANCHOR 0 3D VIEWS INSTALLATION NOTES 0 LL PROPOSED EMBANKMENT SILT FENCE DETAIL (NTS) COMPACTED SUBGRADE EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF 4" CONCRETE 8" DIA. REINFORCING STEEL SPACED AT 181N ON CENTER EACH WAY d / , d d e e °> G o 2 A a 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE SIDEWALK N.T.S. NOTE: SEE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON LOCATION OF INLET STRUCTURES, EMERGENCY OVERFLOW, ELEVATIONS, ETC. 12" CONTROL BLANKET (STRAW, CATEGORY 3N) FLARED END SECTION (PER UTILITY PLAN) EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF COMPACTED SUBGRADE SEEDING WITH SEED MIX 33-261 (35 LB/AC) 4" OF TOPSOIL UNCOMPACTED SUBGRADE 2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE \8\ CLASS AGGREGATE \ \ E BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION N.T.S. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (PER GRADING PLAN) SLOPE PER GRADING 5' MIN. \ —TACK COAT 12" RIP RAP (PER GRADING PLAN) I SITE SIGNAGE I TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES I INFILTRATION BASIN I N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. 6" PVC DRAINTILE 6" PVC WYE. CONNECT CONNECTION 3>_0>, DRAINTILE TO DIRECT LINE NO BENDS GREATER AND CAP WYE OPENING TO THAN 45° SHALL BE ALLOW FUTURE CONNECTION ALLOWEDLq FACE OF CURB DIRECTION OF FLOW NOTE: Lj VANE GRATE SHOWN CATCHBASIN CASTING NEENAH R3067V OR EQUAL WITH VANE GRATE, 3" RADIUS CURB BOX. INSTALL R3290A CASTING IN DRIVEWAYS AND VALLEY GUTTERS. INSTALL R3067VB FOR LOW POINTS. MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH RING. 1 RING WITH MORTAR = 0.2'. 6" CONCRETE COLLAR REQUIRED AROUND THE CASTING AND ALL ADJUSTMENT RINGS. 6" PVC DRAINTILE CONNECTION.) T ONLY PLASTIC SHIMS SHALL BE ALLOWED IF NEEDED. [ MORTAR SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED UNDERGROUND UTILITY MORTAR WHICH MEETS OR EXCEEDS ASTM C270 AND ASTM C387. DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE OUTSIDE AND THE INSIDE. r1 I A K I 24" x 36" PRECAST o AF O 0 o SECTION ZX 3' CATCH BASIN N.T.S. 0 I N NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ALLOWED. - GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW GUTTER GRADE. 10' TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. VARIABLE TOP OF CURB z 6 1/2" 5" MIN 3"GROUT P) MINIMUM 0 VARI 12"- � 0 —16" O C) ° VARIES 0 ° I I 5" MIN 3,> v / ` 4'-0" MIN. a a Qa d � ° Lu m NEENAH R-4342 CASTING OR EQUAL. NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ALLOWED. MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH RING. 1 RING WITH MORTAR = 0.2'. 6" CONCRETE COLLAR REQUIRED AROUND ALL ADJUSTMENT RINGS. ONLY PLASTIC SHIMS SHALL BE ALLOWED IF NEEDED. MORTAR SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED UNDERGROUND UTILITY MORTAR WHICH MEETS OR EXCEEDS ASTM C270 AND ASTM C387. 6" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB. TOP OF BARREL SECTION UNDER TOP SLAB TO HAVE FLAT TOP EDGE SEALED WITH 2 BEADS OF RAMNEK OR APPROVED EQUAL. EXTERNAL WRAP (GATOR WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL) REQUIRED ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE PROFILE GASKETS PER ASTM C443 **DOG HOUSES MUST BE GROUTED BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURE. PIPE SHALL BE CUT OUT 2" FROM INSIDE FACE OF WALL. MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS 6" FOR STRUCTURES 14' IN DEPTH OR LESS. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. REINFORCE IN ACCORDANCE OF MNDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011E. GROUT BOTTOM CATCH BASIN MANHOLE IN GREENSPACE N.T.S. Z >- a0- U 0 O 0 0 (n w W D 0 fn U) 0 Z_ Q 0 LLJ o Q N 0 O 0 PLAN VIEW CURB -CUT (WIDTH VARIES) SPECIFICATIONS O C) 1. STEEL REINFORCED, COLD JOINT SECURED MONOLITHIC CONCRETE 00 PLAN VIEW NOTES STRUCTURE (1,030 LBS). CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM v / ` 1. INLET WIDTH AND DISTANCE BETWEEN BACK OF CURB COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4,500 PSI AT 28 DAYS. CONCRETE AIR Lu m CONCRETE INLET BACK of CURB AND RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET MAY VARY WITH SITE ENTRAINED (5% TO 8.5% BY VOLUME). MANUFACTURED AND DESIGNED Lu CONDITIONS. TO ASTM C858. Q W - DISTANCE VARIES 2. CONCRETE BASE EXTENDS BEYOND THE FILTER WALL Z Y OF THE RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET TO SERVE AS A SPLASH 2. THREE-POINT PICK USING RECESSED LIFTING POCKETS WITH A (� U INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE ,\ INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE DISSIPATOR. STANDARD HOOK. Z � LU 3. FIBERGLASS TOP GRATE (32 LBS, 1-1/2" THICK) - 1,760 LB 0-i U> Lu RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET CONCENTRATED LOAD OR 409 LB/SQ-FT UNIFORM LOAD. 0' 2 (CONCRETE BASE INCLUDED) - 0 0 0 3D VIEWS INSTALLATION NOTES 0 LL 1. INSTALL THE CLASS 5 BASE (COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD O0w0 �J� PROCTOR). THE DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB MAY VARY MryJ� Z >> QUW BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS, BUT CONSIDERATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE W �V -� SLOPE OF THE INLET AND BASIN SIDE SLOPES ADJACENT TO THE RAIN 0 POSITION RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET SO PRIMARY,; GUARDIAN TURRET. POSITION RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET SO PRIMARY OUTLET ALIGNS WITH TOE OF BASIN SIDE SLOPE OUTLET ALIGNS WITH TOE OF BASIN SIDE SLOPE TO AVOID SOIL CO TO AVOID SOIL INTERFERENCE WITH FILTER` INTERFERENCE WITH REMOVABLE FILTER WALL. EXCAVATE 1'10" r'r BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION (I.E. THE BIORETENTION OVERFLOW ELEVATION) TO ACCOMMODATE THE 1' PONDING DEPTH, 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE, AND 4" RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET BASE U T-10" (INCLUDED). THEREFORE, THE TOP OF THE CLASS 5 COMPACTED BASE IS PRECISELY 1'4" BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION. THE INLET TO THE RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET WILL BE 10-1/2" ABOVE THE TOP OF THE ELEVATION VIEW CONCRETE BASE AND 1-1/2" BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION TO r� ACCOMMODATE A SLOPED INLET FROM THE GUTTER TO THE RAIN INLET INSURMOUNTABLE CURB i - GUARDIAN TURRET. RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET (CONCRETE BASE INCLUDED) RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET INLET , 2. SET RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET ON THE PREPARED CLASS 5 BASE. TOP FIBERGLASS GRATE - GUTTERLINE --- - - - HIGH VOLUME OVERFLOW 3. INSTALL FRAMING FOR INLET BETWEEN RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET AND 6., All° 5 j— L- THE TOP OF THE CURB ON THE STREET SIDE AND THE TOP OF THE RAIN ------ a—�—------\- — — -- _ _ — ----iF GUARDIAN TURRET ON THE BIORETENTION SIDE. SITE SPECIFIC ° _ 5" V-3.5" r 1'-1.75" BASIN BOTTOM --------------------- 1-p• 4. INSTALL EXPANSION/CONTRACTION JOINT MATERIAL ORA SHEET OF - 10.5" PRIMARY POLY TO SERVE AS A BOND BREAK BETWEEN RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET SITE SPECIFIC ' 5.5" REMOVABLE OUTLET FILTER WALL I F AND CONCRETE INLET BEFORE POURING INLET. I 4" 5. SIDE CURBS OF THE POURED INLET MUST HAVE AN - of INSURMOUNTABLE PROFILE TO PREVENT WATER FLOW FROM / III CLASS 5 AGGREGATE - 6" ELEVATION VIEW NOTES OVERTOPPING THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE INLET. 1. THE TOP OF THE CLASS 5 BASE (COMPACTED TO 95% L STANDARD PROCTOR) IS PRECISELY 1'4" BELOW THE 6. REMOVABLE FILTER WALL SHOULD BE INSTALLED WITH FILTER GUTTERLINE ELEVATION. FABRIC ON THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET. SUBSOILS RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPED BY: REV BY DATE DESCRIPTION AK6XA IN VAM PRETREATMENT CHAMBER A MDH ,,,,6/2022 TURRET- 1' CISTRET u Iff ;1k jRR-01AN BIORETENTION PONDING DEPTH. 1 MANUFACTURED BY: UBPA1811M&U,6UI,OIBAlDU868UU4 _ tone PRETREATMENT FOR BIORETENTION SWorks SCALE VARIABLE � ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST/CAST STONE TYPICAL DETAIL Rain Gardens " Swales " Filtration Basins - Infiltration Basins CIATION www.RainGuardian.biz NOSPATENT 8501,016 AND 8,858,804 rvanorvn va CERTco"c"ere ASSOCASPTANT Z >- a0- U 0 O 0 0 (n w W D 0 fn U) 0 Z_ Q 0 LLJ o Q N 0 O 0 zN z O C) N M 00 m v / ` M O Lu m 0 Lu CD 00 N Q W - Z Z Y O (� U IU mQ Z � LU 1= LL 0-i U> Lu Q W 0' 2 > J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN z O C) N M 2 /) v / ` M O Lu Lu M LID V Lf),I- WZ ♦ ^ CD 00 N Q W � O N W H Ly W Y� g U IU mQ .. � LU 1= LL 0-i ZwQ wN Q'N U) I j UJ Z U) °D rQ1'� V/^) U � � 2 DZZ U) 'co, OM V LL O0w0 �J� O~ F - MryJ� Z >> QUW OJ W �V �� SHEET NO. z 2 /) Lu Lu z 0 ) U ' V / fl. J O Q J 0 w Lu Uu o Lu z (D 0 oc CO U SHEET NO. TREES, DECIDUOUS (�) SIENNA GLEN MAPLE 2.5" BB (10 QTY) RivER BiRc+� 12FT BB (12 QTY) EN VORY 51LK JAPANESE LILAC 2.0" BB (8 TY) TREES, CONIFEROUS BACK Nies sPRucE SFT BB (r QTY) .w. COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 6FT BB (15 QTY) TECHNITO ARBORVITAE 5FT BB (14 QTY) SNRUBS, DECIDUOUS 0 0 0 0 O 0 VORY HALO DOGWOOD #5 (42 QTY) ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA #3 (lq QTY) LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA #3 (12 QTY) ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD #5 (�, QTY) COMPACT AMERICAN VIBURNUM #5 (7 QTY) RED PRINCE WEIGELA #3 (8 QTY) M155 KIM LILAC #5 (1� QTY) SNRUBS, CONIFEROUS TAUTON YEW #5 (28 QTY) PERENNIALS FRANCES XLLIArIS HOSTA #1 (64 QTY) KARL FOERSTER GRASS #I (12( QTY) STELLA D ORO DAYLILY #1 (10cl QTY) 0 AUTUMN Lor SEDUM #1 (20 QTY) ME ROCK MULCH 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET � JZ NOTES r- -�N No. Date Description REVISIONS fit Greenscape La vuolscaPe • c rri o ati ow • Turf landscape Plan SCALE DRAWN BY CFECKED BY DATE DATE OF PRNT MONTICELILO SUITES HWY 94 AND ELM STREET MONTICIELLO, MN, 55362 Powered by DynaSCAPE® Tree In tory CLW forL) V) w 0 GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION City of Monticello,, Wright County, Minnesota For the purposes of this tree survey, the tree may exhibit one or more of Notes: w the characteristics within each of the L Some trees surveyed near the Q condition categories as described below: property lines are not on the o subject property. See map view. Good: X The tree is mostly vertical, 2. Tree diameter as listed in the comprised of one or more main attached chart indicates a L' o stems, is mostly symmetrical, does measurement of the tree trunk in not exhibit storm damage, does inches at a point five feet above not exhibit evidence of disease. natural grade. Fair: m < 0 0 The tree is most/ vertical, J. Owner shall preserve existing trees. 04 o comprised of one or more main Any removals shall be shown on oN v > N stems, may exhibit some future site plans. Before any C) asymmetrical growth from grading, demolition, or other 0 N crowding, may have minor storm disturbances, tree protection needs 00 m to be installed. O damage, does not exhibit evidence m m w 0 50 of disease. Lw J o Poor: 4. Trees under 6 inches in diameter z Y z The tree may be noticeably were not included in the inventory, N Q w CD w SCALE: 1 = 50 � leaning, comprised of one or more other than those shown. o 0 o U o LE main stems, exhibits asymmetrical growth from crowding, sustained 5. According to the City of Monticello o T T Denotes Limits of Investigation Boundarymajor storm damage, or appears preliminary plot requirements, a 3: co 9 / diseased. survey of tree coverage may 6 - � Denotes Tree, Coniferous exempt trees that are invasive as a� o r - defined by the Department of a Denotes Tree, Deciduous Natural Resources. a� L v o -� > 0 _ �, z 4001 Denotes Tree Identification Number 6. Several Siberian Elm trees were vi °� + : c identified during the on—site tree � ° o investigation. These trees are not � +' o r°n E J shown on the survey or listed in 1b the the attached charts. Siberian Elm (Ulmus pumila) is considered an +' v c a invasive terrestrial plant on the ,� Q .0 v o � a 00 ca Minnesota Department of Natural Q i c 1 Resources website. v QJ o m Cn o tJia t 0 Q' a o co o z Li N � M � Z CP ♦^ 1 00 ♦n 0000 01 LO(.0 W W Ln N z1 0 W H W Y W W M c� z w N Z w 0000 v� W 1 D� } ww �� Q ♦V/�� �(� �N �WZ J 07 a z—a- < .. W Q>Q ow �\ _J \ �4\ \ L V � z O I F— Q / I \ O C U o �- o +� z p o � O U = v LJ O w o v > � ~ o U_ Q U W VSHEETS Tree No. Species DBH (Inches) Condition Stems 4276 Cedar 6 Good 1 4277 Cedar 8 Good 1 4278 Cedar 8 Good 1 4279 Ash 5 Good 3 4281 Basswood 3 Good 1 4282 Hackberry 2 Good 1 4283 Maple 3 Good 1 4284 Basswood 2 Good 1 4285 Maple 2 Good 1 4286 Basswood 2 Good 1 4287 Maple 3 Good 1 From: Cruikshank, Thomas (DOT) To: Hayden Stensaard Cc: Angela Schumann; Peterson. Keith (DOT) Subject: RE: City of Monticello, MN I Application for Preliminary Plat Date: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 10:23:37 AM Attachments: imaae001.Dna image002.pnno Hi Hayden, We would have no substantive concerns with this plat. Only couple of things to pass along are that no stormwater can flow into the ROW — we would like to review any site/development plans when they are presented to the City. Also, if these are developed for residential property we like to see some kind of berming or fencing to mitigate noise from 194. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Tom Cruikshank Principal Planner I District 3 3725 12th Street North, St. Cloud, MN 56303-2107 Phone: (320) 223-6526 1 Cell: (320) 267-9859 Email: thomas.cruikshankPstate.mn.us dm, DEPARTMENT OF IL TRANSPORTATION From: Hayden Stensgard <Hayden.Stensgard@ci.monticello.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 12:47 PM To: Cruikshank, Thomas (DOT) <Thomas.Cruikshank@state.mn.us> Cc: Angela Schumann <Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us> Subject: City of Monticello, MN I Application for Preliminary Plat This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. Good afternoon Tom, The City of Monticello received an application for preliminary plat adjacent to State right -of way. Please find the attached for formal review and comment. Thank you, Hayden Stensgard Community & Economic Development Coordinator City of Monticello, MN Direct: 763-271-3206 CITY OF i Mnt 0 CRC 1&.,no Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government offices is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and may be disclosed to third parties. wsb August 25, 2023 Matt Leonard City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary/Final Plat and Civil Plans — Engineering Review City Project No. 2023-22 WSB Project No. 022968-000 Dear Mr. Leonard: We have reviewed the Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans submittal dated August 16, 2023. The applicant proposes to construct a new 50 -unit four story apartment project including a 70 -stall detached garage complex with a mix of cold and heated spaces. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Monticello's general engineering and stormwater treatment standards. We offer the following comments regarding these matters. City staff will provide additional comments under separate cover. Preliminary/Final Plat & General Comments 1. City staff and Fire Marshall will provide comments under separate cover. 2. With final plat submittal, provide a sheet with hatching for differing pavement types (streets, concrete walk, bituminous trails, etc.). Provide signing and striping sheet(s). 3. The building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements. 4. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments on the plans have been summarized in this review letter. Existing Conditions & Demolition Plans (Sheet C1) 5. The existing site and demolition plans will also need to include existing utility locations, pipe sizes, pipe material types, structure rim/invert elevations, etc. 6. Add more items to the legend including the linetypes for the various elements on the plans such as property lines, easement lines, setback lines, property corners, utility linetypes, etc. 7. Show a 2' strip of bituminous replacement adjacent to curb removals/replacement. 8. Show more contour labels for the areas south of the lot. K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review August 25, 2023 Page 2 Site Plan (Sheet C2) 9. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures and required turnaround space as required by the Fire Marshall. Fire truck circulation will also need to accommodate the City's ladder truck. 10. Provide a pedestrian path along Elm Street and 7th Street adjacent to the development site. Also a pedestrian path is to be installed along the south side of 7th Street to or at a minimum, a connection to the adjacent existing sidewalks should be provided. 11. Show any proposed signage and lighting units on site plan. Add stop signs at the exit points of the site. 12. Turn off existing contouring on site plan for clarity. 13. Confirm whether or not there will be a monument sign and show location on plan. 14. Provide additional dimensioning examples of parking spaces. It appears there are at least two size variations proposed. 15. Provide more specific hatching in the legend for the various pavement types (i.e. 4" versus 6" concrete, standard versus heavy duty bituminous pavement, etc.) Grading & Drainage Plan (Sheet C3) 16. Label more of the proposed contours and the location of all EOF's. Locations of EOF's or other concentrated discharge point over vegetated areas will require a permanent energy dissipation/stabilization method such as rip -rap or permanent turf reinforcement matting. 17. Within handicapped accessible spaces or routes within the parking areas, the grade cannot exceed 2.0%. Provide more grading detail, spot elevations, or note(s) to reinforce this requirement. 18. With final construction plans, provide more spot elevations along curb lines, requisite with what would be required for a surveyor to provide construction staking. 19. Include additional drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runoff within vegetated areas. 20. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures. Utility Plan (Sheets C4) 21. Show more clearly (with thicker lines) where the water/sewer service extensions are located on the plan; currently, they are difficult to distinguish from the existing linework. 22. It is not clear what the existing valve configuration and hydrant location is with the existing water service, review and correct the plans. 23. Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will be required to apply for a permit from DLI, provide copies to the City. 24. Hydrant locations shall be reviewed and approved of by the City Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250' overlapping influence radius (maximum 400' spacing) is required along roadway (hose length). Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. 25. The watermain connections to the building shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV on the plan (if required). K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review August 25, 2023 Page 3 26. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet. 27. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of: a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5'. e. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details. f. The City will require televising for sanitary and storm sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the City for review. Stormwater Management & Modelling (Sheet C5) 28. Provide the hydroCAD calculations with the final submittal to verify drainage areas, impervious and treatment capacity. 29. This site was designed to drain to the regional stormwater pond on the north side of 7th St. The pond will provide rate control for the site based on a curve number of 89. Complete, the site is shown to have a curve of 89 meeting requirements. 30. Sheet 5C references web soil survey for soils information, please Include soil borings to verify soil types and infiltration rates for the site along with separation from the ground water. Soils borings should be a minimum of 5' below the bottom of the proposed infiltration basins. 31. The new site will need to provide onsite volume control for runoff of 1.1" over the new impervious area, Pre-treatment measures are required prior to discharging to the volume control BMPs. a. Verification of soil infiltration rates is required. b. When designing an infiltration practice for volume control and water quality management, on-site testing and detailed analysis are strongly encouraged in order to determine the infiltration rates of the proposed infiltration facility. Documented site-specific infiltration or hydraulic conductivity measurements (double -ring infiltrometer) completed by a licensed soil scientist or engineer is required. 32. An operation and maintenance plan for all stormwater BMPs is required and should be submitted with the stormwater report for review. 33. The site is outside of the DWSMA and is not subject to requirements of the City's Wellhead Protection Plan. 34. Pretreatment, in the form of ponds, forebays, filter strips, or other approved methods, shall be provided for all infiltration areas. Currently rain guardian turrets are shown. K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review August 25, 2023 Page 4 Additional pretreatment will be required for the central infiltration basin to prevent maintenance issues in the future. CBMH 2 and 7 should be 4 foot sumps per City standards. 35. Provide a stabilized EOF route for the central infiltration basin. c. Emergency Overflows (EOFs) shall be sized with a minimum bottom width of five feet and 4:1 side slopes. Label all EOF locations on the plans. d. The maximum flow depth in EOFs shall be less than equal to one foot as calculated for a 100 -year back-to-back storm event. e. At least two feet of vertical separation is required from an area's emergency overflow elevation to the lowest opening of a building. Current plans show garage FIFE of 960 and an EOF elevation of 958. 36. For basins with a suitable outlet, freeboard will be two -feet above the HWL determined by modeling the 100 -year critical event. Verify HWL have a minimum of 2' from all structures. Erosion Control & SWPPP Plans (Sheets C6 & C7) 37. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future full plan set submittals. In progress, a more detailed review of erosion/sediment control and SWPPP will be conducted with future submittals. 38. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review (if required due to disturbance limits), prior to construction commencing. 39. Label redundant perimeter control around the stormwater treatment areas. Silt fence should be double layered to a 3 foot minimum separation and 5 foot maximum separation. Show a row of silt fence or bio -roll at the bottom of the slope around the perimeter of the infiltration areas. 40. Change line type or color on erosion control plan show erosion control BMP's clearly show up. Currently they blend into the contour lines. 41. Erosion control blanket is required for slopes 4:1 or greater. Construction Notes & Standard Details Plans (Sheets C8 & C9) 42. The pavement design/typical section shall be designed to meet the City's standard, at minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site and may need to include a thicker aggregate section and/or a sand section here the fire truck access route is intended. Provide details for the various pavement sections. 43. Provide details for the proposed stormwater treatment areas. A 4" layer of basic "topsoil" is not typically recommended with infiltration basins, reference the MN Stormwater Manual for preferred soil types and specifications. 44. Provide specific details for each of the control structures proposed. K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review August 25, 2023 Page 5 45. Some details appear to be very light in color and may be difficult to read on printed hard copy, please review. 46. Use City details in all cases where practicable. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal. Traffic & Access 47. Five spaces must be dedicated as Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant in the indoor heated lot to meets the required amount for lots with a total of 101-150 parking spaces. Four spaces must be dedicated as ADA compliant in the outdoor lot to meet the required amount with a total of 76-100 parking spaces. Accessible parking spaces and aisles must meet all ADA requirements. 48. The site would generate approximately 227 daily trips, 19 AM peak hour trips and 20 PM peak hour trips. The existing Average Daily Traffic on 71h Street is 5300 and on Elm Street is 1550. The addition of the proposed traffic should not have an impact on roadway capacity or operations. 49. Provide a pedestrian path along Elm Street and 7th Street adjacent to the development site. Also, to provide connectivity, a pedestrian path is to be installed along the south side of 7th Street to or at a minimum, a connection to the adjacent existing sidewalks should be provided. 50. Provide a sight line exhibit at 71" Street access and show that intersection/driveway sight distances will be met. Wetlands & Buffers 51. A wetland delineation should be completed and submitted to the Local Government Unit (the City of Monticello) for review and approval. There is a mapped National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetland at the east side of the parcel. 52. If wetland impacts are proposed, a replacement plan must be submitted to the City of Monticello for Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) review. 53. The City has wetland buffer and setback rules that are based on the functional quality of the wetlands. If wetlands are identified on site, wetland buffers and setbacks will be required. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 612-419-1549 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB L Jim Stremel, P.E. Senior Project Manager K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx MONTICELLO SUITES BRIGGS COMPANIES ELM STREET & 7TH STREET WEST CITY OF MONTICELLO,, SHERBURNE COUNTY, MN CIVIL & SURVEY PLANS PREPARED BY: Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CaCI= •L cam:) Glearwate: ,. Ee�ker .. J Sa l:d a Sil�+er:Cret"t 1J mwl ' AUGUST, 2023 PRELIMINARY PLANS PROJECT LOCATION r- LJ SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA VICINITY MAP NO SCALE Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title Co Cover C1 Removals and Tree Preservation C2 Site Plan C3 Grading Plan C4 Utility Plan C5 Stormwater Management Plan C6 Erosion Control Plan C7 SWPPP Narrative C8 City Details C9 Site Details REV DATE DESCRIPTION NO. - 08/16/2023 DRAWINGS ISSUED TO CITY PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ARE QUALITY LEVEL D. QUALITY LEVEL D PROVIDES THE MOST BASIC LEVEL OF INFORMATION. IT INVOLVES COLLECTING DATA FROM EXISTING UTILITY RECORDS. RECORDS MAY INCLUDE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS, DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICES MAPS, EXISTING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DATABASES. CONSTRUCTION PLANS. ETC. � � s \ s E -- 's, --s / \9 \ SM\ *t llp STMH 3 FSI ,A - 19 6 / ° / \\ \ \ \ Q, - / AUL PROTECT TREES ON BOUNDARY WITH\ _� OROGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE \ S`� S STMH 4 K �— s c� 'o s _ s �S �\ FES 36" CMP S Sr" \ \ Elev.• 932.55 s � D673 � � zll/ / IQ s9 \ \ \ SMH 8 FES 18" CMP / s \ 9si De v.• 958.62 / / 78' CURB CUT / \ / S 8L \ SBL / / / FES 18" �P Dev.• f9.01 K / / 958 \ \ S94 -%( \ \ \ MAINTAIN MN`DOT FZNCE \ se / ` 61 Sed \ seg sec sec / / — m LEGEND: EN 0 REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION (AS INDICATED). REMOVE EXISTING TREES (AS INDICATED) REMOVE FEATURE (AS INDICATED) SALVAGE (AS INDICATED) SAW -CUT DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES: 0 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 1. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM OR COORDINATE ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS FROM EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING, AS WELL AS TO ALL ON-SITE AMENITIES. THESE CONNECTIONS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SANITARY SEWER, UNDERGROUND GAS, ETC. 2. THE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY CONNECTIONS (UNDERGROUND GAS, WATERMAIN, AND STORM SEWER) MAY REQUIRE A PERMIT FROM THE CITY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ELEVATIONS AT PROPOSED CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO FOR ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS, SERVICE TERMINATIONS AND REMOVALS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS WITH THE UTILITY PROVIDERS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS/DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND WORK WITHIN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAYS. 5. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND TREES (NOTED AND NOT NOTED) TO REMAIN AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR DAMAGES TO ANY FEATURES TO REMAIN. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 �o 0 O M O O 0 L0 N O M N ' I O v N M O m U) z o 0 co m 0 Lu z00 «w N Q W � O N Z Y Ll a g U IU m z � Lu 0 Q Lu O U> III Q W 0' 2 > J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN O v N M O U) z o 0 M L� W z00 «w N Q W � O N W H W Y� a g U IU m u � Lu 0 Q Lu O "ZJ ZwQ Lu C-4 CZ'N ♦^ wwZ deo /c/j�) V♦ � � 2 Z:)ZZ (1) N OM V 0w0 CDo OQ �J� CD F_ MryJ� Z>> OJ W oV i w �H V) to W W F_z � Q a— O G JO Lu U U_ V z(D O Or - 2 c 2m SHEET NO. I z p > Lu O V„ U Lu t1A � i LLJ cl \ \ j IIII � - s S- -_ s - \ �\ \ FES 36" CMP s STh, \\ \ `rev.• 932.55 l D679 o VORTH INFILTRATION BASIN \ \ \ \ \ v \► �� ------STMH 4 / I r11 J I. W UKIVt LNI KHIVI,t( I YY.) \ \ FES /8" CMP / /�� °, s z V 'p�� y De v.• 958.62 I / V / o�VATION OF ACCESS TO LOWER LEVEL �UNDER R=20; - -_- _ F zeR z _ BUILDING PARKING - R=20' ^ / ° O R=20' R-20' ., L=31.4' L=_32.9' SOL � 23.3' RETAINING L J SBL max, WALL R=20' SBL / L=25.1' O °xso: ZQR / 17 ^o "d 3>° 3p. O L=12.5' R=5' / �p" L=10. \ 16.3' L=24.0' / , R=5 O� s>.° 1 o)AROEA' / / ^ a (J�/ LEVEL 0 ENTRY33 �(ERHEAD DOOR / .[ /�J /,� =89' 0" ARCH. (950.0' =950'-0•) USGS) \ ELM ST DRIVE ENTRANCE (TYP.) / W L= '.0 / j/ �0� / R=5' T z4 \ / �` R=4' L=9.8' / '0*a°:. L-11.1' O O O O O ADA RAMP o R-20 a'co. 26.OUTDOOR O Y • • . . / / PARKING ^ O • O • • / STALLS PLAY / 4 / AREA / �� 38 DOOR 22 PARKING STALLS \ \ / n gRkFsse R=5' \ RAIN TURRET L--Ri.s' V \X , srq� NO F 2 L=7.s' / ol </ B612 CURB & GUTTER ^m \ 2 \ co \2\3\ Se< , z ENCLOSURE a TRASH 780 8p 0'\ \ \ M \ CENT � RAL INFILTRATION BASIN �/S F // RP/IN TURRET \ L=28.1' \ \ L=7.9' L=11.9' E ' ^ o RAIN TURRET NO \ \ \ \ \ ze \ W y\W W W y R-5 � �O Or ch 1?0 L=19.5' NG \ � •, // //// / p'S�T \ \ R=5' \ \ g Las 6e< v PARKING STALLS TOTAL W W/ / / R=5' 6' \ aalNDooRGARAGEPARKINcsrALLs OPTIONAL GARAGES CAN BE o R=5' CONFIGURED TO BE l / 3, / EAST INFILTRATION BASIN L=7.9'o COMBINED /✓ "�/ // /• \ \ S L=7.9' \ 9( \ O IL=7.0' C / / / \ V Sed 406 � \ � O S L=8.T \ /L � / / se � / I/ co / sk m ,z pro' V \ \ \ \ 34 -OUTDOOR \\ �Bt PARKING \ STALLS `� / Set / \ 7-9 \ \ R=5 R=15' / �- L=19:8' /� 1-94 LEGEND: N po PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED GRAVEL SURFACING 0 40' A a a PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT SCALE: 1" = 40' W W W W W W W W W W W W W PROPOSED TURF ESTABLISHMENT W W W W W W W z } O � 0 U o U) w Lu U) o �2 U) z Q 0 W o CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612 p 0 PROPOSED SIGN SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO FACE OF CURB. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO BACK OF CURB. 2. ALL CONCRETE RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS. 6. SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 7. LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED TO RECEIVE A CERTAIN SEED MIX SHALL BE MIXED WITH SEED MIX 25-131. 9. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: LOT'E' SITE AREA±6.00 ACRES CONCEPT'E1' -APARTMENT DWELLING UNITS PROPOSED -(5) LEVEL 137 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDINGS 100 UNITS (THREE LEVELS OF APARTMENTS AND TWO LEVELS OF A COMBINATION OF PARKING AND APARTMENT UNITS) 137 / 6.0=22.8 UNITS PER ACRE =137 TOTAL APARTMENT UNITS =101 INDOOR LEVEL (1) HEATED ATTACHED COMMON GARAGE PARKING STALLS =17 INDOOR LEVEL (1) HEATED TUCK UNDER GARAGE PARKING STALLS =44 INDOOR DETACHED GARAGE PARKING STALLS =162 TOTAL INDOOR PARKING STALLS, 162 /137=1.18 163 OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS TOTAL TOTAL PARKING STALLS=321 325/137=2.37 PARKING STALLS PER UNIT IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS -PAVEMENT 107,800 S.F. -BUILDING 46,715 S.F -GRASS 106,644 S.F. -TOTAL 261,159 S.F. % IMPERVIOUS 59.1% UNIT MIX PER BUILDING LEVEL (0)= 5 UNITS STUDIOS -1 ONE BEDROOM -1 TWO BEDROOM -1 THREE BEDROOM -2 LEVEL (1)=27 UNITS STUDIOS -3 ONE BEDROOM -6 TWO BEDROOM -10 THREE BEDROOM -8 17 -TUCK UNDER PARKING GARAGES LEVEL (2)=35 UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 LEVEL (3)=35 UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 LEVEL (4)=35 UNITS STUDIOS -4 ONE BEDROOM -9 TWO BEDROOM -14 THREE BEDROOM -8 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 w0 IY Z ' N U Q o m Lo �o O N I I z O U N M m m ♦ V^ z w O O �z m 0 W z °° op N Q W Z Z Y O (D m z L W X Q �W O"ZJWN cL Q W 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN z O U N M w 9)/ ♦ V^ z w O O �z LoV lfj -'j- W � z °° op N Q W LL N W1 W YA li5; Q m .. L W X Q �W O"ZJWN ZwQ Q'N wwZ (neo V♦ DZU) �M V LuZ LL CD O Q �J� 0-1 O~ coJ� Z>> QUW OJ W �V �H SHEET NO. C2 Q W Ln z w w �z 0 U V) O t1A JO Lu U o U cn V a--+ z O _D � cc� G m O U SHEET NO. C2 Q W Ln \ Is, SMH 4 LEGEND: N� \ s TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE z } 7 \ s EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (PER DETAIL) \\ \ FES 36 " CMP s s U) o IMH 2 STM.. Kiev.• 932.55 0 40' Lu \ D s \ \ ASF GRADING LIMITS AND PROPOSED cn \\ TEMPORARY SILT FENCE cn \ / U NORTH INFIL. BASIN \ \ FIBER -LOG ROLLS SCALE: 1" = 40' EOF=945.80 Q `- \\ TREATMENT VOL.=2,284 C.F. \ \ \\ i;�°o�r s / \ P,•i PROPOSED RIP RAP � 067B\ � X 980.50 TC NEW TOP -BACK OF CURB ELEVATION M Lu X 980.50 FL NEW FLOW LINE OF CURB ELEVATION o 946.20 FG \ \ \ Q 9a� EOF=945.80 \ \ ` X 980.50 SW NEW SIDEWALK ELEVATION /� � / '�• 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP \' \ o 91.1 X 980.50 TP NEW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION w O ,C/�` � g s STMH 3 ' -/ _ X 980.50 TG NEW TOP OF GRAVEL ELEVATION z O RA 2!i r 9 49 4g 4j \ 46 AUL ��� \ \ \ \ \ s STMH 4 X 980.50 FG NEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION o U z S 950.00 FG \ \ 6 \ \ X 980.50 EX EXISTING ELEVATION C° o S MH 7 o N cZ! may^ 960 \ S 984 PROPOSED CONTOUR /E-/ \ / \iso \ \ CB PROPOSED SLOPE m FES l8" CMP / / 950.50 FG \ 9si \ \ LU Co Elev.• 958.62 z Z Y - O E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW °o z Lw I / / ya 950.00 FG .o° °1° CB 8 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER- HIGH FLOW Fw-- < w O w 951 948.4 TC 948.40 FL Q w (Y = > J 949.70 TC 0 0 U 0 LL AR 952` \- -\_ - 949.20 FL OROS S - - - - N m C, < V< FQgA ` \ 950.00 TW o \ � 955 3 FG 961.00 SW gRgcFF � 6R�o FRT 953 ` SB 1` L 953.00 TW L� ° 01, 9'SQ ?90 950.33 TC. °j� 961.00 TP 1 �0 954 SB 949.72 TC 949.83 FL / / \ \ C , ` 961.00 SW 9 \ F�®Q%� 949.22 FL SBL `v / 1 / � � 4d O 6 957 00 TW w �1 �2 X950.00 TC / 1 957.00 FG \ � O� S \ 0 951.50 T 949.50 FIL 961.00 SW 961.00 FG 959.95SW� 982 950 GRADING GENERAL NOTES 950.00 TC,, / 960.15 SW 959.45 F� 950.50 TC s� X949.50 FL / : ( , �y ,\ 959.65 FL p� O 950.00 FL h 950.35 TC / / V \ �d ❑ / / � 959.95 SW 960.88 SW 950.50 TC � 949.85 FL 0959.45 FL 950.00 FL 955.00 TW / / \ / �� 959.80 TC �� Y0�� �° 9570 / \ \ \ 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS L �/ / / \ 888.30 FL o ° a ?oo p�p IN THE FIELD REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEER '` Tv 960.25 TC / / / J'T (zoo � BEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. O 959.75 FL / /'�� �/ c rn p p 960.88 SW 961.00 SW y S2 / // \ IS,o / / \ �< < y � 954.20 TC �� g�3 / \ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS / / Sr° �\° o n . 953.70 FL WORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY ? 959.13 TC I o 96o.oasw ClSo gyp // �' COMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND J /959.00 FG /'�� 958.63 FL W� 960.05 SW / COMMENCING WORK. �/ / 961.50 TC 1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP (EA.) / 961.001- i / 959.44 FL ^. \° ` 959.95 SW / 960.00TC ` \ 959.45 FL o/ 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT SILT AND DEBRIS / 959.50 FL �� F� 959.50 TC F( mO rn 'lob 09 / 960.00 FG / ?o, 959.00 FL °go gs9 EOF-955.80 yy� / RUN-OFF DURING GRADING OPERATIONS (I.E. SILT FENCE, STRAW BALES, ETC.). / 960.70 TC 1� ` \ \ ``9S / 954.00 TC / / 953.50 FL 960.20 FL r 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH 961.10 TC 960.60 FL / 1 �� ``� s\ r GRADING PLAN, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TO F r ( F 4 , °� 959.50 TC 960.25 FG t� •, / / 960.47 TC \''0% 959.45 TC . 959.00 FL gSs 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP REMAIN. MEET EXISTING GRADES ALONG STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, AND DRIVEWAY / 959.97 FL tel° 958.95 FL gsa ENTRANCES. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENTS THAT REMAIN TO THEIR ORIGINAL IF NOT 961.00 TP , O g 58.00 TC 957.77 TC / F` F(oyo mss` 57.50 FL F(, 957.27 FL / r BETTER CONDITION. NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE 960.50 TC '66 2% F / / v960.00 FL 958.99 958.99 TC (?0 o gs / / PROJECT. \\ \ \ 96p 961.50 TC � , 956 958.49 FL / r 961.00 FL F V CENTRAL INFIL. BASIN ` I° ° r/ 5. TURF ESTABLISHMENT AREAS SHALL RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH AS MEASURED IN \ \ A a (750FL ssl.00Tc s � o EOF=958.00 F F( / PLACE OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE 880.80 FL TREATMENT VOL.= 10,236 C.F. 956.00 Tc � � ` s gs � ` (1.0% zoo � 1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP zio 961.0 / TC 957.50 FL\ ` s \ / 957.50 TC / CONTRACTOR. ALL GRADED SLOPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 5:1 SHALL BE 960.55 TC &5". 958.00 TC r957.00FL / HYDROSEEDED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETED, OR MULCHED TO HELP STABILIZE THE 0 � � \ \ \ 960.05 FL 960.50 FL 956 ` \S8 957.50 FL / \ \ 960.87 TC r / SLOPES BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. \ \ 960.37 FLS S 960.50 TC 1\9` 958.55 TC EOF=958.00 / rr \ 6( \ 960.00 FL F(0g° `` 958.05 FL �` r / 6. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE TOP OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. \ \ o / / r ELEVATION OF FLOW LINE IS 6" BELOW TOP OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. \ \ O Se F �� 9S9 ° c4 /r r EAST INFIL. BASIN \ ( ' e r / 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT, \960.90 TC N °° 858.20 Tc � � � // EOF=955.80 \ 960.40 FL 4 960.21 TC 960.07 TC 958.70 FL 'v ° 958.75 TC •�.rr m`O / TREATMENT VOL.=2,416 C.F. FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BE \95Sk FL � ^ ^ �= r DONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. \ 959.71 FL \ o 4 958.25 FLS / T rr /r IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL AS 95935 C\ / r REQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALS \ S 9 F 958.85 FL \ e� s�00 (? 959.80 TC F( o rah r/ SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT. \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ ,r(°S° \ Se 959.30 FL 1'So •• r// 3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 8. IT IS INTENDED THAT EARTHWORK (CUT VS. FILL) BALANCE ON SITE. THE CONTRACTOR 960.00 TP SHALL SUBMIT THE QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AND AMOUNT OF ANTICIPATED GRADE 958.50 TC / 3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP \ 958.00 FL / ADJUSTMENT FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF FOUR WEEKDAYS PRIOR 959.35 TC/ // TO MAKING ADJUSTMENTS. ALL GRADE ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE \� \ 958.85 FL �� / / ENGINEER. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR WORK ASSOCIATED 959\ \ \ a 959.20T\ seg \ WITH GRADING ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EARTHWORK \ \ ^ 958.70 FL OPERATIONS, STORM SEWER PIPING AND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS, CONSTRUCTION Seg N o / SURVEYING FOR ADJUSTING FEATURE LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY, SILT FENCE, ETC. \ \ 960.00 T. \\ F(0 ° �° �� �a / /r // 9. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE 5 ° AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -SEED OR RE -SOD ALL APPLICABLE 960.48 TC /r r AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE \ \� 959.98 FL T� se /r // ENGINEER. \ o / 959.74 TC 10. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE, OR OTHER 95925 TC ./ POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET \.24 FL 958.75 FL / HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS 959.43 TC / ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO 958.93 FL / - THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR /.94 PIPING OR SIMILAR) 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES, PIPING, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL NOT BE \ \ REMOVED UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. zN O v Lu N M IT �z v / ` 0 O O - o L0 WZ ♦^ °° �op N Q W � O N WH W YLu � a Q U w� .. - � w mQ � LL. O"ZJwN ZKQ Q'N w W Z -1-F V) Z:)ZZ O Q w O � LL CO O(n 0J� O~ 0006 Z>> QUW of O C)C -H WE SHEET NO. C3 W I I I Lu w �z 0 u z OLu J z U u a) Q z� V v O C)C -0 o m U SHEET NO. C3 W I I I FES 18" CMP Ele v.• 958.62 Off/ a N W \\ 7 LEGEND: �T \ SMH 4 << PROPOSED STORM SEWER �K s I PROPOSED WATER LINE s z } / * C \ \ / s > PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER v \ 7 \ s a U / s I -I PROPOSED FITTING ~ IMH 2 / \\ \ FES 36 " CMP � _ U 0 Kiev.• 932.55 s 0 40' W D w PROPOSED WATER SERVICE 0 U) LO \\ s PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE / \ U SCALE: 1" 40' EOF=945.80 NORTH INFIL. BASIN s PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE = a `- \\ 0 / TREATMENT VOL.=2,284 C.F. �\ PROPOSED FLARED END SECITON \ �\ D673 0 PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE M LU PROPOSED CATCH BASIN N 9a� \ EOF=945.80 \ \ ` ►� PROPOSED GATE VALVE & BOX 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP PROPOSED HYDRANT 944 % '/�, W o �( , 1, 9 s4j 94s 94 �\ FST\ STMH 3 v e PROPOSED CLEANOUT z 949 Qg \ B \ \ � �: O••� PROPOSED RIP RAP cM.l STMH 4 � •��•�• � g � EXTEND 8" SDR -26 SANITARY \ 6 \ U Lo O SERVICE 20 LF @ 0.50% MIN. \ N / / /00 \ CONNECT TO BUILDING. / \ O N \ ` \ sk `95.9 \ 1 CB RIM -958.70 E INV. -955.70 / 3 FES / INV.=954.50 / / / / / / / \ �2 CBMH \ � � RIM=958.75 W INV.=955.00 NE INV.=955.00' CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE S INV.=945.00 8 CBMH / \ RIM=949.50/ \W INV. =945.50 / //NJ NV.=945.50 / / •950 / 31 LF 16-0 RCP @ 1.02 / / / / / / 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / 6 STMH RIM=955.50 N INV.=951.50 / / / / 1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP EAST INFIL. BASIN EOF=955.80 TREATMENT VOL.=2,416 C.F. 3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP UTILITY GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL UTILITY RELOCATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS WORK AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND COMMENCING WORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH GRADING PLAN AND EXISTING UTILITIES, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TO REMAIN. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AS EXISTING IN THE FIELD AND AS REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEER BEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5. WATER LINE SHALL BE A MINIMUM 8.0 FEET DEPTH UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON PLANS. 6. VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING SANITARY LINE AT POINT OF CONNECTION WITH NEW SANITARY LINE PRIOR TO INSTALLING ANY NEW UTILITIES. 7. ALL CROSSING ELEVATIONS OF NEW UTILITIES & SIZES OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES ARE BASED ON ASSUMED ELEVATIONS AND SIZES PROVIDED BY THE SURVEY. 8. ALL SANITARY SERVICE PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SDR -26 PVC. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING TWO CONSECUTIVE PASSING BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS FROM THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE. 10. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY CONCRETE PAVEMENT WHICH IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED WATER, SANITARY, STORM SEWER SERVICE INSTALLATION. 11. FOR WATER SERVICE LINES #12 AWG SOLID COPPER CLAD STEEL (CCS) WIRE WITH 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) INSULATING JACKET, COLOR BLUE. 12. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER. NO DEWATERING IS EXPECTED FOR THIS SITE DUE TO SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR PAVEMENT REMOVAL, UTILITY INSTALLATION, AND REPLACEMENT AS NEEDED. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM FINAL ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 15. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE OVER 18" IN DIAMETER SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES: 16.1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 16.2. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS: 16.3. FERNCO, "CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS" OR "LARGE -DIAMETER WATERSTOPS" 16.4. PRESS -SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS" OR APPROVED EQUAL 17. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR). 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND GUTTER. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCH BASINS TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING. ' I z O U N M O m m m w 0 - 0 Lu Zw «w N Q Lu Z Z Y O (�0 U W r` Z W coQ F LL LU O"ZJ U Q W 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN z O U N M O z00 w 0 - M Ln W Zw «w N Q Lu 0�o N WH U) Ycl) a Q U W r` .. - W coQ F LL LU O"ZJ Z�Q WN Q'N LU LuZ W u) op F__N rQ1'� /c/p� V♦ > Z ?ZZ O M V L�WO loo O � J� O ~ MryJ� Z> > QUW OJ W �V �H SHEET NO. r� z Lu w �z 0 U V) O JO U o U z ILD oc O 2 5O L W 'i.- 0 U SHEET NO. r� / )e'K / N O m 755�,MH UL NORTH INFIL. BASIN EOF=945.80 \ �\ / TREATMENT VOL.=2,284 C.F. \ \\ LEGEND: N AREA CN =�oo�paPROPOSED RIP RAP - io>oo • o > BUILDING � U X 980.50 TC NEW TOP -BACK OF CURB ELEVATION 106,644 0 TOTAL WEIGHTED 261,159 83 X 980.50 FL NEW FLOW LINE OF CURB ELEVATION0 40' 0 0 6929 3173 TOTAL: X 980.50 SW NEW SIDEWALK ELEVATION 10236.5 or - LL" NORTH INFIL. BASIN 955 518 X 980.50 TP NEW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION SCALE: 1" = 40' zz z REGIONAL POND 904 Q X 980.50 TG NEW TOP OF GRAVEL ELEVATION 2160 1380 TOTAL: cCw0 i) 2284.0 X 980.50 FG NEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION EAST INFIL. BASIN 955 309 J 0 X 980.50 EX EXISTING ELEVATION W o 1106.5 ~ N 984 PROPOSED CONTOURCD 0 CO F- PROPOSED SLOPE 2416 COMBINED VOLUME E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=945.80 \ 4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP \ \ \ \ /916- 9 / �b0 941 4S 946 i 949 94g \ n SBL, •950 / �4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP EAST INFIL. BASIN EOF=955.80 TREATMENT VOL.=2,416 C.F. C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / / / old i / / / / / / / L � DRAINAGE NOTES: GENERAL DESCRIPTION: THE MONTICELLO SUITES CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 -LEVEL APARTMENT WITH OUTDOOR AND INTERIOR PARKING. THE SITE IS 6.0 ACRES. THERE IS 107,800 S.F. OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT AND THE BUILDING IS AROUND 46,715 S.F. SITE ENTRANCES ARE LOCATED ON 7TH STREET WEST AND ELM STREET. SOILS AND INFILTRATION ACCORDING TO THE WEB SOIL SURVEY, THE EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS ON THE SITE IS A 20 INCH LAYER OF SANDY LOAM WITH GRAVELLY COARSE SAND. WITH EXCAVATING THE TOP LAYER OF SOIL, THE BASINS WILL INFILTRATE INTO THE COARSE SAND (HSG) A WITH AN ASSUMED INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR. RATE CONTROL A REGIONAL POND HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR 7TH STREET WEST AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE EXISTING OUTLET B WAS DESIGNED TO UTILIZE A CN OF 89. THE FOLLOWING CURVE NUMBERS AND AREAS WERE USED TO VERIFY THE PROPOSED CN IS LESS THAN THE PREVIOUS CN DESIGN OF 89. TYPE AREA CN PAVEMENT 107,800 98 BUILDING 46,715 98 GRASS/PERVIOUS 106,644 61 TOTAL WEIGHTED 261,159 83 ALL STORM WATER IS DIRECTED TO THE STORM SEWER WITHIN 7TH STREET WEST TO OUTFLOW TO THE REGIONAL POND. VOLUME RETENTION THREE INFILTRATION BASINS ARE PROPOSED ON SITE TO PROVIDE VOLUME CONTROL FOR A 1.1 INCH STORM. WITH 14,163 S.F. OF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, 14,163 C.F. (525 C.Y.) OF VOLUME IS REQUIRED TO BE HELD WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASINS. THE COMBINED VOLUME OF THE BASINS TO THE INITIAL OUTLET IS 14,936.5 C.F. (553 C.Y.) THE FOLLOWING TABLE ADDS TOGETHER THE VOLUMES OF THE BASINS. WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. N O N C) 0 z U` 0 O O L0 N O M N CONTOUR AREA VOLUME BETWEEN CENTRAL INFIL. BASIN 955 1356 0 0 956 3504 2430 W 957 5763 4633.5 Cf) 957.5 6929 3173 TOTAL: LLI 10236.5 or - LL" NORTH INFIL. BASIN 955 518 O"z zz 956 1290 904 00 Cf)V♦ 956.8 2160 1380 TOTAL: cCw0 i) 2284.0 Lu EAST INFIL. BASIN 955 309 J 0 0 0 956 1904 1106.5 956.5 3334 1309.5 TOTAL: 2416 COMBINED VOLUME 14936.5 WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. N O N C) 0 z U` 0 O O L0 N O M N zN ' I �: N M V ♦ z 0 0 m M LO'zt W m z00 �o? N Q Lu Cf) ofco N LU W H m 0 LLI or - LL" .. D'Q w �_ U) X �,L w O"z zz w" �N Y -i O 00 Cf)V♦ //)� =0Z oN cCw0 i) [LA coF- Lu 0_j� z>> �Uw of W �V J 0 0 0 0 U LL zN O U N M V ♦ z 0 0 M LO'zt W z00 �o? N Q Lu Cf) ofco N LU W H wY� or - LL" .. D'Q w �_ U) X �,L w O"z Z(YQJ w" �N QC� } w F- w w Z 00 Cf)V♦ //)� =0Z oN cCw0 i) [LA coF- MO 0_j� z>> �Uw OJ W �V �� () V) W LU ~z Q O JO Lu U U_ V z� O 2m SHEET NO. z Q J 1 z W U +-+ W toz 0 a� oc U Lu o Q o U V) s SMH 3 s T Is, 0 FES 18 CMP / El e v.• 958.62 1 / kf IK w /� y y ROCK CONSTRUCTION IT s NORTH INFIL. BASIN EOE=945.80 �\ \ TREATMENT VOL.=2,284 C.F. � F / SF 240 S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET _ ?/// ol / REGIONAL POND I / T UL K �— s s � � �\ s� � s \ \ FES 36" CMP STMH \\ \Elev.• 932.55 D67F F=945.80 '•' C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP \_STMH 3 � INSTALL 432 LF \ 6 STMH 4 \ OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE SMH 7 / / 9S2 950 s / 95119 \ � / / / -ss / /4 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / / / / —1 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP -EAST INFIL. BASIN EOF=955.80 TREATMENT VOL.=2,416 C.F. S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET -INSTALL 20 LF OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOG C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP --3 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP INSTALL 20 LF OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOG wj_w"« INSTALL LF �/'/ / // OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE DIN \L LEGEND: ASF d°ice 984 0 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N) GRADING LIMITS AND PROPOSED TEMPORARY SILT FENCE FIBER -LOG ROLLS PROPOSED RIP RAP PROPOSED CONTOUR EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER- HIGH FLOW EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 0 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE CONSTRUCTION/GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. 2. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S STORM WATER PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 3. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR GRADING OPERATIONS AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE PERMIT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY MEASURABLE RAINSTORM. DAMAGED SILT FENCE OR OTHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR PRACTICES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DEVICES SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. 5. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION. 6. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND THE MPCA. 7. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE DISTURBANCE OF ANY AREAS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL TRIBUTARY DISTURBED AREAS ARE RESTORED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING SILT FENCE AND BALES, UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT VEGETATION IN SAID AREAS. 9. ALL SOILS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER OFF-SITE AREA SHALL BE REMOVED DAILY. 10. THE SITE SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES FOR THE PROJECT MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION. 11. ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED AND VEGETATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE TO MN/DOT 2575. 12. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITH MN/DOT SEED MIX, MULCHED, FERTILIZED & DISK ANCHORED, PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: STANDARD SEED MIX 25-131: 220 LB/AC. INFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX 33-261: 35 LB/AC. FERTILIZER 22-5-10: 350 LB/AC. MULCH TYPE 3: 2 TONS/AC. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BMP'S SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON PLANS DURING PHASING ON PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH MPCA, CITY INSPECTOR AND DEVELOPER REQUEST. APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES • SILT FENCE: 3,428 LF • BIOLOG: 80 LF • ROCK CONSTRUCTION: 1 EACH • INLET PROTECTION: 12 EACH • EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N): 290 S.Y. • RIP RAP (CLASS 2) 18 C.Y. Z } O � �° U 0 (n W Lu U) 0 �2 U) z 0 of Z N � p o ° o O Lu co zN I z O v N M O m V) m U) z w C) 0 �z m 0 W Q op zop N Q Z Z Y - O U U > cU r� mX Z OfQ W H LL O U Q W 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN z O v N M O V) ate+ U) z w C) 0 �z M Ln W � Q op zop N Q N WH U) Ycl) a a U > cU r� mX .� OfQ W H LL O "ZwQ ZJ WN of wwz W c~/)� ~ rQ1'� /c/p� V♦ > Z �ZZ � �M V W 0 LL r.p O(n OJ� Oti MryJ� Z > > QUW OJ W �V �H SHEET NO. a J a— _j O z 0 O V) W z V) ate+ Lu w �z 0 Q �--+ V) O CSA JO U o U U z(D Oor- � m `- U SHEET NO. a J a— _j O z 0 O V) W STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE: GENERAL INFORMATION THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT NO. MN R1000001 FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PROJECT NAME: MONTICELLO SUITES LOCATION: ELM ST & 7TH ST W, MONTICELLO MN SHERBURNE COUNTY LAT/LONG: 45.301553, -93.809709 DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 -STORY APARTMENT BUILDING, GARAGE, ASPHALT PARKING, GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION, AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. PROJECT CONTACTS PAT BRIGGS AND THE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP PREPARATION: 5.97 SWPPP PREPARER: CHRISTOPHER DAHN 0.00 -BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES TRAINING: ENGINEER AND SWPPP DESIGNER (EXP 2025) ADDRESS: 13076 FIRST STREET 3.55 BECKER, MN 53308 TELEPHONE: 763-262-8822 EMAIL; CDAHN@BOGART-PEDERSON,COM OWNER: °° 2 N OWNER CONTACT: PAT BRIGGS ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 719, BIG LAKE, MN 55309 TELEPHONE: (612)-919-1561 EMAIL; PAT@THEBRIGGSCOMPANIES.COM CONTRACTOR (TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR): BUSINESS NAME Z OWNER NAME Y MAILING ADDRESS w N �N CITY w w z TELEPHONE Z EMAIL � CONTACT NAME p LLJ MAILING ADDRESS 0' CITY J TELEPHONE 0 EMAIL 0 LL ESTIMATED DATES OF CONSTRUCTION: START DATE _/ / (TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR) COMPLETION DATE _/ / (TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR) PERMANENT STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS SEE THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION. CONTACT BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES FOR REPORT. PROPOSED FLOW RATE IS LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTING THE WATER NORTH TO A REGIONAL POND PREVIOUSLY SIZED. VOLUME CONTROL IS PROVIDED THROUGH 3 INFILTRATION BASINS ON SITE TO CONTAIN 1.1 INCHES OF RAINFALL OVER THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. SOIL GROUP: A/B DESCRIPTION OF EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITY: EROSION CONTROL CONSISTS OF SILT FENCE PERIMETER CONTROL, TURF ESTABLISHMENT THROUGH SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLACEMENT. CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 5.97 ACRES PRE -CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.00 ACRES POST CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.55 ACRES NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.55 ACRES RECEIVING WATERS: STORM WATER FROM THIS SITE WILL BE DISCHARGED TO THE CITY STORM SEWER WHICH IS DISCHARGED INTO A REGIONAL POND. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THE PLAN SHEETS OF THIS PLAN SET INDICATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: • THE PROJECT LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. • LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. • LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., BUFFER ZONES, WETLANDS, ETC.). • STEEP SLOPE LOCATIONS. • LOCATIONS OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT. • THE DETAIL SHEETS INDICATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT. • IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DOWN GRADIENT SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOG INSTALLATIONS ARE TO BE INPLACE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. TOPSOIL IS TO BE WINDROWED ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND PLACED AS SLOPE DRESSING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE GRADING OPERATIONS, AS THE GRADING OPERATIONS PROCEED. TOPSOIL PLACEMENT ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES THOUGH THE WETLANDS AREA IS TO BE SPREAD BY A LOW IMPACT CRAWLER TRACTOR OPERATING UP AND DOWN THE SLOPES SO AS TO PROVIDE TRACK PRINTS PARALLEL WITH THE CONTOURS. INSTALLATION OF MN/DOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES ADJACENT THE WETLANDS AREA. ALL TEMPORARY SOILS STOCKPILES WILL REQUIRE AN EFFECTIVE MEANS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL SUCH AS AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET COVERING OR SILT FENCE INSTALLATION ALONG THE TOE OF SLOPE. ALL COMPLETED SWALES SLOPES AND BOTTOMS NOT DRAINING TOWARDS WETLAND AREAS ARE TO BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION WILL BE REQUIRED IN AREAS WHERE GRADING OPERATIONS ARE SUSPENDED OR CEASED FOR A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS OR GREATER. A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE PROJECT ENTRANCE ON ELM STREET. STREET SWEEPING OF THE PAVED SURFACES WILL BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. TIMING OF EROSION CONTROL: SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOGS WILL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. RIPRAP AND FILTER BLANKET WILL BE PLACED AT THE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE OUTLET PLACEMENT THE CONTRACTOR MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION WHEREVER CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT OCCUR FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 7 DAYS. STABILIZATION WORK MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN 200 FT OF A PUBLIC WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETING CONSTRUCTION DURING PERIODS OF "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" FOR TIME PERIODS DECLARED BY THE DNR. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DISTURBED AREA UNTIL VEGETATION IN ESTABLISHED ONCE VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE SILT FENCE AND ANY OTHER TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL THAT IS NOT BIODEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED. STREET SWEEPING TO BE PROVIDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER. THE CITY REQUIRES STREET SWEEPING TO OCCUR WITHIN 8 HOURS OF NOTICE FROM THE CITY. APPLYING MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE STABILIZATION IN ANY PART OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE. BLANKETS OR OTHER APPROVED, BY THE ENGINEER, METHOD SHALL BE USED. u�y�xars.��r_vu>t•ranrrana►�y�_zar►•irri� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AND SCHEDULING THE WORK OF ALL OPERATIONS, INCLUDING SUBCONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES, SUCH THAT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE FULLY EXECUTED FOR EACH OPERATION AND IN A TIMELY MANNER OVER THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. OPERATORS HAVE DAILY ACCESS TO THE PROJECT SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION UNTIL THE ENTIRE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND N.O.T HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A TRAINED INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON THE PROJECT. THAT INDIVIDUAL IS TO BE IDENTIFIED AT THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND LISTED IN THE MINUTES THEREOF. THE APPOINTED INDIVIDUAL IS TO PERFORM A ROUTINE INSPECTION OF THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. A INSPECTION FORM WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ARE TO BE NOTED ON THE INSPECTION FORM AND CORRECTED BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY. PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED WHEN THEY ARE NO LONGER EFFECTIVE OR WHEN THE SEDIMENT REACHES ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. TRAINING DOCUMENTATION: SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, REVISING, AMENDING, AND INSPECTING (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR) NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OVERSEEING & INSPECTING DATE OF TRAINING NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING CONTENT OF TRAINING TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING BMP INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR) NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OVERSEEING & INSPECTING DATE OF TRAINING NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING CONTENT OF TRAINING TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING POLLUTION PREVENTION FERTILIZERS ARE TO BE APPLIED ONLY IN THE AMOUNTS AS SPECIFIED AND WORKED INTO THE SOIL TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO STORMWATER RUNOFF. ONSITE REFUELING OPERATIONS ARE TO BE CONDUCTED WITH CARE. ANY INADVERTENT SPILLAGE OF FUEL OR CHEMICALS IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS MAJOR SPILLS ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE MPCA 24 HOUR NOTIFICATION NETWORK AT 800 422 0798. ALL VEHICLES ON-SITE ARE TO BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND SUBJECT TO ROUTINE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EFFORTS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF LEAKAGE AND OR SPILLS. l.�:ir_� 3r�ya�irr_va-�►��c��r:�yzyurri�y_v��r.>t 3��:z.�•a.�az.�r�yrr�a�u>taairiaz.��ra �sa���a:��-� �_�y CONCRETE BATCH TRUCKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DISCHARGE DRUM AND CHUTE WASHOUT DIRECTLY ON THE GROUND. A PORTABLE WASHOUT RECEPTACLE IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE LOCATION AS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. FINAL STABILIZATION FINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS WHEN 70 PERCENT OF THE PERVIOUS AREA IS COVERED WITH UNIFORM, PERMANENT VEGETATION. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND THE NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT PLAN DESCRIPTION TITLE LOCATION EROSION CONTROL DETAILS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C8 -C9 EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONS EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONS C6 24 HOUR MPCA EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 651-649-5451 800-422-0798 ESTIMATED QUANTITIES THE FOLLOWINGUIRED FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL UANITITES IS AN ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY AMOUNT REQUIRED Q BMP'S AT THE START OF THE PROJECT. THIS ESTIMATE IS PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ANY ADDITIONAL AND/OR REPLACEMENT BMP'S QUANTITIES WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY QUANTITIES AT START OF PROJECT: ITEM UNIT ESTIMATED INITIAL QUANTITY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT EA 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER EA 12 TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT EA 1 TEMPORARY PUMP SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE EA 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS LF 80 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 3,428 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N) SY 290 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. PREVENTION OF SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, AND STORM AND SANITARY SEWERS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 1.02 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM. MINNESOTA PERMIT NO: MN R100001. 1.03 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. B. DO NOT BEGIN CLEARING, GRADING, OR OTHER WORK INVOLVING DISTURBANCE OF GROUND SURFACE COVER UNTIL APPLICABLE PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED; FURNISH ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED TO OBTAIN APPLICABLE PERMITS. 1. OBTAIN AND PAY FOR PERMITS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. C. TIMING: PUT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IN PLACE PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF SURFACE COVER AND BEFORE PRECIPITATION OCCURS. D. EROSION OFF SITE: PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL AND DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT ON OTHER PROPERTIES CAUSED BY WATER LEAVING THE PROJECT SITE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT. 1. PREVENT TRACKING OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC ROADS OUTSIDE SITE. 2. PREVENT MUD AND SEDIMENT FROM FLOWING ONTO PAVEMENTS. E. SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF SITE: PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF THE PROJECT SITE, INCLUDING RIVERS, STREAMS, LAKES, PONDS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, STORM SEWERS, AND SANITARY SEWERS. 1. IF SEDIMENTATION OCCURS, INSTALL OR CORRECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY AT NO COST TO OWNER; REMOVE DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS; COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. F. MAINTENANCE: MAINTAIN TEMPORARY PREVENTIVE MEASURES UNTIL PERMANENT MEASURES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE: WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE GEOTEXTILE RESISTANT TO COMMON SOIL CHEMICALS, MILDEW, AND INSECTS; NON -BIODEGRADABLE; IN LONGEST LENGTHS POSSIBLE; FABRIC INCLUDING SEAMS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM AVERAGE ROLL LENGTHS: 1. AVERAGE OPENING SIZE: 20 U.S. STD. SIEVE, MAXIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4751. 2. PERMITTIVITY: 0.05 SEC^ -1, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4491. 3. ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANCE: RETAINING AT LEAST 70 PERCENT OF TENSILE STRENGTH, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4355/D4355M AFTER 500 HOURS EXPOSURE. 4. TENSILE STRENGTH: 100 LB -F, MINIMUM, IN CROSS -MACHINE DIRECTION; 124 LB -F, MINIMUM, IN MACHINE DIRECTION; WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632. 5. ELONGATION: 15 TO 30 PERCENT, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632. 6. TEAR STRENGTH: 55 LB -F, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4533. 7. COLOR: MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD, WITH EMBEDMENT AND FASTENER LINES PREPRINTED. 8. SILT FENCE POSTS: ONE OF THE FOLLOWING, MINIMUM 5 FEET LONG: a. STEEL U- OR T -SECTION, WITH MINIMUM MASS OF 1.33 LB PER LINEAR FOOT. b. SOFTWOOD, 4 BY 4 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION. C. HARDWOOD, 2 BY 2 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: FILTER LOGS SHALL CONSIST OF TYPE WOOD FIBER BIOROLLS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPEC. 3897. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. SHALL BE SILTSOXX PERIMETER CONTROL BY FILTREXX, INC., OR EQUAL. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. DROP-IN SEDIMENT FILTER UNIT THAT INSERTS INTO THE INLET. 1) SHALL BE FLEXSTORM PURE: PERMANENT INLET FILTER BY ADS, INC., OR EQUAL. (a)PROVIDE CURB OPENING PROTECTION FOR EXISTING INLETS WITH CURB OPENINGS. D. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 1. ROCK SHALL BE CLEAN 1 TO 2 INCH WASHED ROCK. E. TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 1) SHALL CONSIST OF A UNIFORM WEB OF INTERLOCKING STRAW OR WOOD FIBERS SANDWICHED BETWEEN AN ATTACHED TOP AND BOTTOM LAYER OF NET BACKING. 2) THE NETTING SHALL BE BIODEGRADABLE CONTAINING SUFFICIENT UV STABILIZATION FOR BREAKDOWN TO OCCUR WITHIN A NORMAL GROWING SEASON. 3) STAPLES USED TO ANCHOR THE BLANKETS SHALL BE U -SHAPED, 11 GAUGE OR HEAVIER STEEL WIRE HAVING A SPAN WIDTH OF 1 INCH AND A LENGTH OF 8 INCHES OR MORE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM AFTER BENDING. 4) THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE: (a)GEO-SYNTHETICS, INC., - LANDLOK 52. (b)NORTH AMERICAN GREEN - S150. (c)OR EQUAL. b. BONDED FIBER MATRIX. 1) THE FIBERS SHALL BE COMPOSED OF 100% WOOD OR WOOD BY-PRODUCTS. A MINIMUM OF 25% OF THE FIBERS SHALL AVERAGE 10.16 MM (0.4 INCHES) IN LENGTH AND 50% OR MORE SHALL BE RETAINED ON A CLARK FIBER CLASSIFIER 24 MESH SCREEN. FIBERS SHALL BE COLORED WITH A WATER SOLUBLE, NON-TOXIC DYE, TO AID IN UNIFORM APPLICATION OVER THE SITE. 2) THE BINDER SHALL BE A HYDRO COLLOID BASED (GUAR GUM) WITH ADDED SLOW-RELEASE AND AGRICULTURAL BASED FERTILIZERS. THE BINDER SHALL NOT DISSOLVE OR DISPERSE UPON REWETTING. 3) THE BFM SLURRY SHALL DRY TO FORM A CRUST APPROXIMATELY 3-6 MM (1/8 TO 1/4 INCHES) THICK ADHERING TO THE SOIL SURFACE. 4) THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE MATRIX SHALL BE 12% +/- 3% BY WEIGHT. 5) THE MATRIX SHALL CONSIST OF MATERIALS THAT ARE 100% BIODEGRADABLE AND 100% BENEFICIAL TO PLANT LIFE. 6) THE MATRIX SHALL PROVIDE 100% CONTINUOUS COVERAGE AND SHALL HAVE NO HOLES GREATER THAN 1MM IN SIZE. 7) THE HYDRATED MIXTURE DENSITY SHALL BE APPROXIMATED BY A SLUMP TEST PRIOR TO APPLICATION. 8) THE BFM MULCH: WATER RATIO SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. THE MINIMUM BFM MULCH TO WATER RATIO IS 50LBS BFM MULCH AND 100 GALLONS WATER. THE WATER RATE WILL VARY BETWEEN 100 GALLONS AND 125 GALLONS PER 50LBS, DEPENDING ON WHICH OF THE PRODUCTS IS USED. 9) THE BONDED FIBER MATRIX MULCH PRODUCTS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE. (a)ECOAEGIS - MANUFACTURED BY CANFOR. (b)SOIL GUARD - MANUFACTURED BY MAT, INC. (c)CONWED 3000 - MANUFACTURED BY CONWED FIBERS, INC. F. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEWN INTO A BAG USING A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE AND HIGH STRENGTH THREAD. a. SEAMS SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE WIDTH STRENGTH OF 60LB/INCH AS PER ASTM D4883 AND MEET OR EXCEED THE FOLLOWING. 1) GRAB TENSILE OF 205 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4632. 2) PUNCTURE OF 110 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4833. 3) FLOW RATE OF 95 GAL/MIN/SF AS PER ASTM D 4491. 4) PERMITTIVITY OF 1.5 SEC -1 AS PER ASTM D 4491. 5) MULLEN BURST STRENGTH OF 350 PSI AS PER ASTM D 3786. 6) AOS% OF 80% US SIEVE AS PER ASTM D 4751. 2. SPOUT LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A 4 INCH DISCHARGE HOSE WITH STRAP TO TIE UNIT CLOSED. 3. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. DIRTBAG. 1) ACF ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2831 CARDWELL ROAD, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23234, 800-448-3636. b. DANDY DEWATERING BAG. 1) DANDY PRODUCTS, INC., P.O. BOX 1980, WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43086, 800-591-2284. c. OR EQUAL. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 PREPARATION A. SCHEDULE WORK SO THAT SOIL SURFACES ARE LEFT EXPOSED FOR THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF TIME. B. THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OPERATOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER PERMIT NO. MN R100001. C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AND SIGN THE NOTICE OF INTENT, OBTAIN THE OWNER'S SIGNATURE, AND SUBMIT TO THE MPCA. 1. PROVIDE A SIGNED COPY TO THE OWNER. 3.03 INSTALLATION A. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 1. THE ROCK AREA SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES DEEP, EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE EGRESS AREA AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 50FT LONG, HOWEVER, LONGER ENTRANCES MAY BE REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY CLEAN THE TIRES. 2. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF MUD FROM THE UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE ROCK. B. TEMPORARY SILT FENCES: 1. STORE AND HANDLE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4873. 2. USE NOMINAL 30 INCH HIGH BARRIERS, MINIMUM 60 INCH LONG POSTS SPACED AT 6 FEET MAXIMUM SPACING. 3. EMBED BOTTOM OF FABRIC IN A TRENCH ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE, WITH 6 INCHES OF FABRIC LAID FLAT ON BOTTOM OF TRENCH FACING UPSLOPE; BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT. 4. MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT. a. STEEL POST = 24 INCHES, MINIMUM. b. WOOD POST = 18 INCHES, MINIMUM. 5. DO NOT SPLICE FABRIC WIDTH; MINIMIZE SPLICES IN FABRIC LENGTH; SPLICE AT POST ONLY, OVERLAPPING AT LEAST 18 INCHES, WITH EXTRA POST. 6. FASTEN FABRIC TO WOOD POSTS USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: a. FOUR NAILS PER POST WITH 3/4 INCH DIAMETER FLAT OR BUTTON HEAD, 1 INCH LONG, AND 14 GAGE, 0.083 INCH SHANK DIAMETER. b. FIVE STAPLES PER POST WITH AT LEAST 17 GAGE, 0.0453 INCH WIRE, 3/4 INCH CROWN WIDTH AND 1/2 INCH LONG LEGS. 7. FASTEN FABRIC TO STEEL POSTS USING WIRE, NYLON CORD, OR INTEGRAL POCKETS. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: 1. PERIMETER CONTROL SHOULD BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO THE BASE OF THE SLOPE OR OTHER DISTURBED AREA. 2. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE PERIMETER CONTROL ON 10 FT CENTERS, USING 2 IN BY 2 IN BY 3 FT WOODEN STAKES. IN THE EVENT STAKING IS NOT POSSIBLE, I.E., WHEN PERIMETER CONTROL IS USED ON PAVEMENT, HEAVY CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL BE USED BEHIND THE PERIMETER CONTROL TO HELP STABILIZE DURING RAIN EVENTS. D. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTERS. 1. DROP-IN SEDIMENT TRAP. a. PLACE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. E. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. F. TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 1. PLACE AT ANY AND ALL FINISH SLOPES THAT ARE STEEPER THAN 10H:1 V. 2. SEED AND FERTILIZE PER SPECIFICATION 32 9219 PRIOR TO INSTALLING TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 3. BONDED FIBER MATRIX. a. INSTALL THE BFM AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM GUIDELINES. 1) THE BFM SHALL BE APPLIED WITH HYDRAULIC SPRAY EQUIPMENT BY A MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFIED APPLICATOR. 2) APPLICATION SHALL BE DONE AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PROJECTED RAINFALL TO ALLOW THE BFM MULCH ADEQUATE TIME TO DRY. 3) THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN TWO STAGES (ONE-HALF RATE) WITH AMPLE TIME TO DEWATER THE FIRST APPLICATION. 4) THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED FROM AT LEAST TWO ALTERNATE DIRECTIONS, PREFERABLY 90 DEGREES APART, IF POSSIBLE, TO ENSURE ALL SOIL FACES ARE COVERED. 5) THE INSTALLATION RATE OF THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE 3500 LBS PER ACRE, MINIMUM AND 100% COVERAGE. 4. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. a. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 3.04 MAINTENANCE A. INSPECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES WEEKLY, WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE END OF ANY STORM THAT PRODUCES 0.5 INCHES OR MORE RAINFALL AT THE PROJECT SITE, AND DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. B. REPAIR DEFICIENCIES IMMEDIATELY. C. TEMPORARY SILT FENCES: 1. PROMPTLY REPLACE FABRIC THAT DETERIORATES UNLESS NEED FOR FENCE HAS PASSED. 2. REMOVE SILT DEPOSITS THAT EXCEED ONE-THIRD OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. 3. REPAIR FENCES THAT ARE UNDERCUT BY RUNOFF OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED, WHETHER BY RUNOFF OR OTHER CAUSES. D. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT. 1. PERIODIC ADDITION OF ROCK, OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF PAD SHALL BE PROVIDED AS VOIDS BECOME FILLED WITH SOIL. E. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. REPLACE THE UNIT WHEN 1/2 FULL OF SEDIMENT OR WHEN SEDIMENT HAS REDUCED THE FLOW RATE OF THE PUMP DISCHARGE TO AN IMPRACTICAL RATE. F. PLACE SEDIMENT IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS ON SITE; DO NOT REMOVE FROM SITE. 3.05 CLEANUP A. REMOVE TEMPORARY MEASURE AFTER PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. B. WHERE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY MEASURES WOULD LEAVE EXPOSED SOIL, SHAPE SURFACE TO AN ACCEPTABLE GRADE AND FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT GROUND SURFACES. END OF SECTION MISSISSIPPI RIVER (IMPAIRED WATER) SITE LOCATION 1 MILE RADIUS IMPAIRED WATERS MAP RI . 7.,r qf. hAarttic�ge r nµntry [I uh f3ialr COLirse Rd 0.5 MI r - O�"•s - e� �L a �tiapfiaii AVE Brldpvlew k.,: Morlticello Z >_O F- a U E O 0 o U) w Lu D 0 U) U) U) C� Z_ 0 w N � o Q N 0 0 00 0 WO IY Z ' M 2 2 C, 0 O N o :2U a 0 co o 0 co zN Lu V) w O v N M IT Z O m 00 o 0 - co Loj- �A WZ °° 2 N co m 0 Lu W Yco a QU w� .� - Z Z Y - O w N �N U w w z U) op ~ Z >�ZJw Z�M?Z0 � V p LLJ Q w 0' 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN Lu V) w O v N M IT Z O ♦♦^^ z 00 o 0 - co Loj- �A WZ °° 2 N Q W �o N W H W Yco a QU w� .� - Of w mQ F LL O Z J zw< w N �N U) w w z U) op ~ rQ1'� V) >�ZJw Z�M?Z0 � V "nwo0� O N� I..I. "~ ryV >O Z>QM OHJ O UW SHEET NO. C7 Lu a z V) Lu V) w z ate+ Z O Q �--+ V) t1A - J p w U O U a) T z� O N� I..I. SO G co O U SHEET NO. C7 Lu a z V) Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY Or CA -25 Rlprap Bedding g ,ss ,; Geotextile fabric Original grade HORNTAL °. _ IZO 0 0 0 o Z CONCRETE CURB LD >- (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) AND GUTTER SECTION B -B U REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION (not to scale) O Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates W o DIVIDER PLATE 3"R ° 1 2 ~ 1 y / ° Q Cn 3"R Q SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT 3 6" 13 1/2 ~ EXPANSION d JOINTS Original Cn U STREET CSLOPE 3R4" Fr EXPANSION Geotextile fabric SECTION A -A grade Z - BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT - INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT ,_ AIMIN" "�_-_ JOINTS 6,A B B (not to scale) of o TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND LINE" 7" ,, ` _ ` / m ° a °Q a ° a° ° 5' NOTED. GhannelZe runoff t0 Sediment Sediment Trapping Device °° a a ° trapping device w N - HORIZONTAL / �� , °a ° ° ° ° a I � _ ` TRACER WIRE SPLICE LINE / MNDOT SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H °° a ° ° Q ICONCRETE -- CURB BOX STANDPIPE OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 P I PERMITTED, THE FORM GUTTERSLOE SE 0 4 4 o.0 7 CU YDS /LIN FT (6612) MAY BE TILTED 8612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 21.1 FT CU. YDS. B612 T CONCRETE 0 BE EXPANSION EXPANSION POURED INTEGRALLY LA M CD i O I IWITH COPPER STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE 12' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 CURB JOINTS JOINTS -CLAD TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY I DIVIDER PLATE 3"R W Z POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKETPOLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE I TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CIN CONTRACT 1 6 1/2 " �C Cl) � -) � _j o CONTRACT I 3"R 3� 13 1 2 6~ / PLAN j �O N SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT OR �' / o / Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates CD U Q o co LU 0 — — - 1" COPPER WATERMAIN SLOPE 3/4"/FT / A A 66 co COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY 2" MIN 2 7" / \� / o ) F B o O N POLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT i B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER Q / o o E E o / o 0 0 0 0 0 i } m SANITARY SERVICE O MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER 2" HORIZONTAL LINE / 1g VARIAB LE " �/4 PER /MIN " �. F?—�� 4 l 0 � / �c o 0 0 o Q / o 00 0 6i W J _ Z Y LL' z LLI � U MNDOT © SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0582 CU YDS / LIN FT (B618) 7" MIN. 7" �_ g L ��a��� �� _ - W o o �o 0 3 o o I— (n Q W (D W Q Q Q (� Q w MAY BE TILTED 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 17.2 Fr / CU.YDS. (6618) o o 12~ CD 3/4 " / PER FT 3~ WIDTH VARIES 1 5' MIN. 18" z 0 24' min. B " X / Slope away from 1/2 R 1/2 R 3~ 3' 7" , o~ SECTION 13-13SECTION A—A w , highway HORIZONTAL 50 J LINE ° min. - Match or Right of Way 2'- 0" Existing MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Grade PLAN =moi Title: Tracer Wire Standard Plate Library Developments) Title: Concrete Curb & Gutter Standard Plate Library for Streets Title: Commercial Driveway Standard Plate Library Entrance Title: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance O Q O Monticello City Of Date:Plate No. Cit of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 City Of Monticello iCellO Date: Plate No. 03-05 � City Of Monticello Date: Plate No.03-08 06-14 3005 - -- -- 5005 - 008 -_ 6 002 Revised:03-15 Revised: 03-15 � - _- Revised: 03-15 i Revsed: 03-15 zN M O U N O C/ ` M 0 �� W ZCO �C? N Q LU of N WH W Y�C'o QU W~ CO OU W� O"zJ WN Z�Q N ' EXIST NG CURB W W Z U)� Z W I-� OVERFLOW IS %z OF ''^^ � HOZ �N THE CURB BOX HEIGHT CD V♦ C/) LL LL(D Of J (DF_ z�i NO PARKING SIGN MODIFIED) R7 -81M 121Nx18IN 181N - - WHITE ON BLUE ON BLUE , R7-8bP 121Nx6IN WHITE ON BLUE 60" GROUND LINE r—FINISHED GROUND LINE SITE ACCESSIBLE SIGN 3/81N DIA. BOLT WITH WASHER & LOCKWASHER NOTE: 1. ALL POSTS AND ANCHORS SHALL BE 12 GAUGE WITH HOLES ON ALL FOUR SIDES 2. LEAVE 1 TO 2 HOLES EXPOSED ABOVE FINISHED GROUND LINE FOR CONNECTIONS OF POST TO ANCHOR 3. SIGNS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 1. THE SEDIMENT LOGS SHALL BE TRENCHED 4" INTO THE GROUND AND SHALL BE STAKED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS OR 2"X 2" WOOD STAKES. 2. SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF LOGS. STAKED AND ENTRENCHED 10" DIA. SEDIMENT LOG FILTERED RUNOFF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET EDIMENT-LADEN RUNOFF COMPACTED SOIL TO PREVENT PIPING SEDIMENT LOG INSTALLATION PEX-"SILT STOP" FABRIC PROPOSED EMBANKMENT SILT FENCE DETAIL (NTS) COMPACTED SUBGRADE EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF 4" CONCRETE 8" DIA. REINFORCING STEEL SPACED AT 181N ON CENTER EACH WAY d / , d d e e °> G o 2 A a 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE SIDEWALK N.T.S. NOTE: SEE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON LOCATION OF INLET STRUCTURES, EMERGENCY OVERFLOW, ELEVATIONS, ETC. 12" CONTROL BLANKET (STRAW, CATEGORY 3N) FLARED END SECTION (PER UTILITY PLAN) EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF COMPACTED SUBGRADE SEEDING WITH SEED MIX 33-261 (35 LB/AC) 4" OF TOPSOIL UNCOMPACTED SUBGRADE 2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE \8\ CLASS AGGREGATE \ \ E BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION N.T.S. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (PER GRADING PLAN) SLOPE PER GRADING 5' MIN. \ —TACK COAT 12" RIP RAP (PER GRADING PLAN) I SITE SIGNAGE I TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES I INFILTRATION BASIN I N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. 6" PVC DRAINTILE 6" PVC WYE. CONNECT CONNECTION 3>_0>, DRAINTILE TO DIRECT LINE NO BENDS GREATER AND CAP WYE OPENING TO THAN 45° SHALL BE ALLOW FUTURE CONNECTION ALLOWEDLq FACE OF CURB DIRECTION OF FLOW NOTE: Lj VANE GRATE SHOWN CATCHBASIN CASTING NEENAH R3067V OR EQUAL WITH VANE GRATE, 3" RADIUS CURB BOX. INSTALL R3290A CASTING IN DRIVEWAYS AND VALLEY GUTTERS. INSTALL R3067VB FOR LOW POINTS. MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH RING. 1 RING WITH MORTAR = 0.2'. 6" CONCRETE COLLAR REQUIRED AROUND THE CASTING AND ALL ADJUSTMENT RINGS. 6" PVC DRAINTILE CONNECTION.) T ONLY PLASTIC SHIMS SHALL BE ALLOWED IF NEEDED. [ MORTAR SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED UNDERGROUND UTILITY MORTAR WHICH MEETS OR EXCEEDS ASTM C270 AND ASTM C387. DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE OUTSIDE AND THE INSIDE. r1 I A K I 24" x 36" PRECAST o AF O 0 o SECTION ZX 3' CATCH BASIN N.T.S. 0 I N NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ALLOWED. - GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW GUTTER GRADE. 10' TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. VARIABLE TOP OF CURB z 6 1/2" 5" MIN 3"GROUT P) MINIMUM 0 VARI 12"- � 2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKES @ 4' —16" O C) O O.C. 0 ° O 01 1/21N X 1 1/21N v / ` 4'-0" MIN. a a Qa d � ° p SIGN POST m CONCRETE INLET BACK of CURB AND RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET MAY VARY WITH SITE ENTRAINED (5% TO 8.5% BY VOLUME). MANUFACTURED AND DESIGNED 10' MINIMUM O CONDITIONS. TO ASTM C858. Q W - O FINISHED GROUND LINE Z Y BACKFILL (� 7\777 �\ INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE ,\ INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE DISSIPATOR. STANDARD HOOK. //-\ /771/\ �/. � LU 3. FIBERGLASS TOP GRATE (32 LBS, 1-1/2" THICK) - 1,760 LB 0-i BURY BOTTOM 1 3/41Nx 1 3/41N EXISTING GROUND �� 2 / 6" OF FABRIC ANCHOR 0 3D VIEWS INSTALLATION NOTES 0 LL PROPOSED EMBANKMENT SILT FENCE DETAIL (NTS) COMPACTED SUBGRADE EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF 4" CONCRETE 8" DIA. REINFORCING STEEL SPACED AT 181N ON CENTER EACH WAY d / , d d e e °> G o 2 A a 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE SIDEWALK N.T.S. NOTE: SEE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON LOCATION OF INLET STRUCTURES, EMERGENCY OVERFLOW, ELEVATIONS, ETC. 12" CONTROL BLANKET (STRAW, CATEGORY 3N) FLARED END SECTION (PER UTILITY PLAN) EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF COMPACTED SUBGRADE SEEDING WITH SEED MIX 33-261 (35 LB/AC) 4" OF TOPSOIL UNCOMPACTED SUBGRADE 2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE \8\ CLASS AGGREGATE \ \ E BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION N.T.S. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (PER GRADING PLAN) SLOPE PER GRADING 5' MIN. \ —TACK COAT 12" RIP RAP (PER GRADING PLAN) I SITE SIGNAGE I TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES I INFILTRATION BASIN I N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. 6" PVC DRAINTILE 6" PVC WYE. CONNECT CONNECTION 3>_0>, DRAINTILE TO DIRECT LINE NO BENDS GREATER AND CAP WYE OPENING TO THAN 45° SHALL BE ALLOW FUTURE CONNECTION ALLOWEDLq FACE OF CURB DIRECTION OF FLOW NOTE: Lj VANE GRATE SHOWN CATCHBASIN CASTING NEENAH R3067V OR EQUAL WITH VANE GRATE, 3" RADIUS CURB BOX. INSTALL R3290A CASTING IN DRIVEWAYS AND VALLEY GUTTERS. INSTALL R3067VB FOR LOW POINTS. MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH RING. 1 RING WITH MORTAR = 0.2'. 6" CONCRETE COLLAR REQUIRED AROUND THE CASTING AND ALL ADJUSTMENT RINGS. 6" PVC DRAINTILE CONNECTION.) T ONLY PLASTIC SHIMS SHALL BE ALLOWED IF NEEDED. [ MORTAR SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED UNDERGROUND UTILITY MORTAR WHICH MEETS OR EXCEEDS ASTM C270 AND ASTM C387. DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE OUTSIDE AND THE INSIDE. r1 I A K I 24" x 36" PRECAST o AF O 0 o SECTION ZX 3' CATCH BASIN N.T.S. 0 I N NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ALLOWED. - GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW GUTTER GRADE. 10' TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. VARIABLE TOP OF CURB z 6 1/2" 5" MIN 3"GROUT P) MINIMUM 0 VARI 12"- � 0 —16" O C) ° VARIES 0 ° I I 5" MIN 3,> v / ` 4'-0" MIN. a a Qa d � ° Lu m NEENAH R-4342 CASTING OR EQUAL. NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ALLOWED. MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH RING. 1 RING WITH MORTAR = 0.2'. 6" CONCRETE COLLAR REQUIRED AROUND ALL ADJUSTMENT RINGS. ONLY PLASTIC SHIMS SHALL BE ALLOWED IF NEEDED. MORTAR SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED UNDERGROUND UTILITY MORTAR WHICH MEETS OR EXCEEDS ASTM C270 AND ASTM C387. 6" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB. TOP OF BARREL SECTION UNDER TOP SLAB TO HAVE FLAT TOP EDGE SEALED WITH 2 BEADS OF RAMNEK OR APPROVED EQUAL. EXTERNAL WRAP (GATOR WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL) REQUIRED ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE PROFILE GASKETS PER ASTM C443 **DOG HOUSES MUST BE GROUTED BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURE. PIPE SHALL BE CUT OUT 2" FROM INSIDE FACE OF WALL. MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS 6" FOR STRUCTURES 14' IN DEPTH OR LESS. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. REINFORCE IN ACCORDANCE OF MNDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011E. GROUT BOTTOM CATCH BASIN MANHOLE IN GREENSPACE N.T.S. Z >- a0- U 0 O 0 0 (n w W D 0 fn U) 0 Z_ Q 0 LLJ o Q N 0 O 0 PLAN VIEW CURB -CUT (WIDTH VARIES) SPECIFICATIONS O C) 1. STEEL REINFORCED, COLD JOINT SECURED MONOLITHIC CONCRETE 00 PLAN VIEW NOTES STRUCTURE (1,030 LBS). CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM v / ` 1. INLET WIDTH AND DISTANCE BETWEEN BACK OF CURB COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4,500 PSI AT 28 DAYS. CONCRETE AIR Lu m CONCRETE INLET BACK of CURB AND RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET MAY VARY WITH SITE ENTRAINED (5% TO 8.5% BY VOLUME). MANUFACTURED AND DESIGNED Lu CONDITIONS. TO ASTM C858. Q W - DISTANCE VARIES 2. CONCRETE BASE EXTENDS BEYOND THE FILTER WALL Z Y OF THE RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET TO SERVE AS A SPLASH 2. THREE-POINT PICK USING RECESSED LIFTING POCKETS WITH A (� U INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE ,\ INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE DISSIPATOR. STANDARD HOOK. Z � LU 3. FIBERGLASS TOP GRATE (32 LBS, 1-1/2" THICK) - 1,760 LB 0-i U> Lu RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET CONCENTRATED LOAD OR 409 LB/SQ-FT UNIFORM LOAD. 0' 2 (CONCRETE BASE INCLUDED) - 0 0 0 3D VIEWS INSTALLATION NOTES 0 LL 1. INSTALL THE CLASS 5 BASE (COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD O0w0 �J� PROCTOR). THE DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB MAY VARY MryJ� Z >> QUW BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS, BUT CONSIDERATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE W �V -� SLOPE OF THE INLET AND BASIN SIDE SLOPES ADJACENT TO THE RAIN 0 POSITION RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET SO PRIMARY,; GUARDIAN TURRET. POSITION RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET SO PRIMARY OUTLET ALIGNS WITH TOE OF BASIN SIDE SLOPE OUTLET ALIGNS WITH TOE OF BASIN SIDE SLOPE TO AVOID SOIL CO TO AVOID SOIL INTERFERENCE WITH FILTER` INTERFERENCE WITH REMOVABLE FILTER WALL. EXCAVATE 1'10" r'r BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION (I.E. THE BIORETENTION OVERFLOW ELEVATION) TO ACCOMMODATE THE 1' PONDING DEPTH, 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE, AND 4" RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET BASE U T-10" (INCLUDED). THEREFORE, THE TOP OF THE CLASS 5 COMPACTED BASE IS PRECISELY 1'4" BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION. THE INLET TO THE RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET WILL BE 10-1/2" ABOVE THE TOP OF THE ELEVATION VIEW CONCRETE BASE AND 1-1/2" BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION TO r� ACCOMMODATE A SLOPED INLET FROM THE GUTTER TO THE RAIN INLET INSURMOUNTABLE CURB i - GUARDIAN TURRET. RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET (CONCRETE BASE INCLUDED) RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET INLET , 2. SET RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET ON THE PREPARED CLASS 5 BASE. TOP FIBERGLASS GRATE - GUTTERLINE --- - - - HIGH VOLUME OVERFLOW 3. INSTALL FRAMING FOR INLET BETWEEN RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET AND 6., All° 5 j— L- THE TOP OF THE CURB ON THE STREET SIDE AND THE TOP OF THE RAIN ------ a—�—------\- — — -- _ _ — ----iF GUARDIAN TURRET ON THE BIORETENTION SIDE. SITE SPECIFIC ° _ 5" V-3.5" r 1'-1.75" BASIN BOTTOM --------------------- 1-p• 4. INSTALL EXPANSION/CONTRACTION JOINT MATERIAL ORA SHEET OF - 10.5" PRIMARY POLY TO SERVE AS A BOND BREAK BETWEEN RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET SITE SPECIFIC ' 5.5" REMOVABLE OUTLET FILTER WALL I F AND CONCRETE INLET BEFORE POURING INLET. I 4" 5. SIDE CURBS OF THE POURED INLET MUST HAVE AN - of INSURMOUNTABLE PROFILE TO PREVENT WATER FLOW FROM / III CLASS 5 AGGREGATE - 6" ELEVATION VIEW NOTES OVERTOPPING THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE INLET. 1. THE TOP OF THE CLASS 5 BASE (COMPACTED TO 95% L STANDARD PROCTOR) IS PRECISELY 1'4" BELOW THE 6. REMOVABLE FILTER WALL SHOULD BE INSTALLED WITH FILTER GUTTERLINE ELEVATION. FABRIC ON THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET. SUBSOILS RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPED BY: REV BY DATE DESCRIPTION AK6XA IN VAM PRETREATMENT CHAMBER A MDH ,,,,6/2022 TURRET- 1' CISTRET u Iff ;1k jRR-01AN BIORETENTION PONDING DEPTH. 1 MANUFACTURED BY: UBPA1811M&U,6UI,OIBAlDU868UU4 _ tone PRETREATMENT FOR BIORETENTION SWorks SCALE VARIABLE � ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST/CAST STONE TYPICAL DETAIL Rain Gardens " Swales " Filtration Basins - Infiltration Basins CIATION www.RainGuardian.biz NOSPATENT 8501,016 AND 8,858,804 rvanorvn va CERTco"c"ere ASSOCASPTANT Z >- a0- U 0 O 0 0 (n w W D 0 fn U) 0 Z_ Q 0 LLJ o Q N 0 O 0 zN z O C) N M 00 m v / ` M O Lu m 0 Lu CD 00 N Q W - Z Z Y O (� U IU mQ Z � LU 1= LL 0-i U> Lu Q W 0' 2 > J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN z O C) N M 2 /) v / ` M O Lu Lu M LID V Lf),I- WZ ♦ ^ CD 00 N Q W � O N W H Ly W Y� g U IU mQ .. � LU 1= LL 0-i ZwQ wN Q'N U) I j UJ Z U) °D rQ1'� V/^) U � � 2 DZZ U) 'co, OM V LL O0w0 �J� O~ F - MryJ� Z >> QUW OJ W �V �� SHEET NO. z 2 /) Lu Lu z 0 ) U ' V / fl. J O Q J 0 w Lu Uu o Lu z (D 0 oc CO U SHEET NO. Open Space -- Increased open space areas per unit beyond code minimums of 10% or more Parking -- All required garage parking attached to principal building Building Materials Increased use of stone, brick beyond Increased use of stone, brick beyond front, or on other exterior walls front, or on other exterior walls Architecture Extensive use of ornamental Extensive use of ornamental features, building and/or roofline features, building and/or roofline articulation, fenestration and articulation, fenestration and building wall undulation atypical of building wall undulation atypical of other buildings in similar zoning other buildings in similar zoning districts districts Site Work Use of decorative paving materials in Use of decorative paving materials in parking, sidewalks, etc.; Extensive parking, sidewalks, etc.; use of ornamental site lighting or Extensive use of ornamental site similar features. lighting or similar features. Housing for Seniors Accommodations to design and Accommodations to design and restricted to 55 years of age density through PUD process only density through PUD process only or more (1) Medium -High Density Residence District (R-4). The purpose of the "R-4", Medium -High Density Residential District is to provide for medium to high density housing in multiple -family structures of 13 or more units per building, and at densities of between ten and 25 units per acre. The district is intended to establish higher density residential opportunities in areas appropriate for such housing, to be determined by the city on a case by case basis. This district is intended to provide exclusively multiple - family housing as defined in this chapter, as opposed to lower density housing types such as townhouses, two-family homes, or single-family homes. The City of Monticello shall zone land to the R-4 District only when, in its sole discretion, all aspects of the property support the potential uses of the R-4 district, including location, private and public services, and compatibility with existing and future land uses in the area. In making a determination as to the suitability of a site for R-4 rezoning, the city will prioritize the following site and area factors: (1) Replacement land uses. R-4 zoning fits the following zoning categories and circumstances: (a) Land already zoned for R-3 — Medium Density Residential District (b) Land currently zoned for commercial uses, but which would not be considered "prime" commercial and critical to "Successful Commercial Centers and Corridors" consistent with the City's 2040 Vision + Plan. (2) Proximity to other residential neighborhoods. (a) R-4 zoning may be allowed in proximity to other medium to high density residential areas, however the nature and concentration of existing multi -family structures shall be carefully considered to avoid an over concentration of these uses. (b) R-4 zoning may be allowed in proximity to lower residential uses, if it is determined that the high density site can address the site and area factors provided here. (3) Architectural compatibility and building massing. (a) In the vicinity of lower density residential areas, R-4 District buildings need to be lower profile with regards to size and mass, or need to be screened or buffered by distance and natural features. (4) Requirement for adequate public facilities. High density residential development shall be located to provide for the following essential services and amenities: (a) Access to public parks, pathways, and open space, without overburdening them. R-4 development may be required to provide additional facilities to meet the city's open space planning policies. (b) Connection to public utilities. (c) Access to major streets, or at the very minimum, avoidance of traffic generation that would utilize local streets in lower density residential areas. (d) Proximity to commercial and/or medical services. (5) Minimum and maximum density: 10 units minimum — 25 dwelling units maximum per acre. TABLE 3-9: R-4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS R-4 District Multi -Family (13+ units/building) Base Lot Area 30,000 sf. Gross Density 10-25 du/acre Max Density w/o PUD NA Net lot area per du Max 1,750 sf/du Front setback 100 feet Corner side setback 40 feet Interior side setback 30 feet Rear setback to building 40 feet Clear open space setback from ROW 60 feet Clear open space setback from Property Line 40 feet - no more than 50% of any yard facing a street covered with parking/drive aisles Buffer Req. to Single-family C buffer Common open space per du 500 sf/du Landscaping 2 ACU 2,500 sf. open space + 4 shrubs /10 feet bldg. perimeter Parking requirements 1.2 spaces/bedroom, with max 1.1 space/du uncovered Architecture 20% street min frontage covered with enhanced materials, horizontal siding of steel or cement -board only (no vinyl or aluminum) Roofs 5:12 pitch, plus roof ridge line articulation of 3 feet min. or roofline or building line articulation, including flat and/or varied rooflines, parapets, canopies or other similar features which increase architectural interest and variability. Unit square feet 800 sf. Minimum finished floor area per unit average, with no more than 10% of the units as studio units. Garages Attached or Underground Detached accessory garages allowed only after base requirements are met; requires authorization through Conditional Use Permit Garage Setback May not access street directly — must be served by interior driveway Garage Doors Must include glass and decorative panels if visible from public street or adjoining residentially zoned property Landscaping Increased landscape quantities and/or sizes beyond code minimums; Special landscape features including water features, recreational structures, patios, etc. Open Space Increased open space areas per unit beyond code minimums of 10% or more Parking All required garage parking underground Building Materials Increased use of stone, brick beyond front, or on other exterior walls Architecture Extensive use of ornamental features, building and/or roofline articulation, fenestration and building wall undulation atypical of other buildings in similar zoning districts Site Work Use of decorative paving materials in parking, sidewalks, etc.; Extensive use of ornamental site lighting or similar features. Housing for Seniors restricted to 55 years of Accommodations to design and density through PUD age or more process only INTRODUCTION The Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation Chapter outlines the goals, policies and land use strategy that will guide future land use development and decision- making in the community as well as in the Orderly Annexation Area (MOAA). The MOAA is included in this land use plan to help plan for and ensure orderly and efficient growth, and to protect and maintain the MOAA until that growth occurs. This Chapter also serves to inform other aspects and chapters of the Comprehensive Plan, including transportation and mobility, housing, community facilities and parks and open space. Overall, the Future Land Use Plan will help define the pattern and location of development in the City for the next 20 years. Monticello desires a balanced land use pattern to ensure a stable and growing tax base that promotes economic diversity and resiliency to changes in the local, regional, state and national economy. The Future Land Use Plan describes a strategic, recommended pattern of land uses in the City and MOAA. The strategy also emphasizes the improvement and enhancement of Monticello's downtown and surrounding traditional neighborhood blocks, the repositioning of the City's commercial areas to take advantage of emerging economic opportunities, and the diversification of the tax base through ongoing economic development efforts that promote job growth and expand existing employment centers. The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) illustrates land use planning according to specific land use categories. In addition, this Chapter is an important tool for achieving Monticello's environmental sustainability and public health goals. Specific policies and strategies are included that advance an efficient land use and transportation pattern to reduce greenhouse gases and promote clean air and water, provide new mobility options, support local businesses, and is accessible and inclusive of persons of all ages, races and physical capabilities. This Chapter supports goals for economic sustainability consistent with the Economic Development Chapter. This Chapter also integrates transportation strategies recommended in the Mobility and Connectivity Chapter with an aim toward implementing a complete multi -modal transportation system. This Chapter introduces concepts that reinforce goals and strategies for other chapters of the Monticello 2040 Plan, including Parks, Pathways and Open Space and Community Character. TABLE 31- EXISTING LAND USEACREAGES (WITHIN CITYBOUNDARIES) CategoriesLand Use Acreage Residential (Single -Family, Twin and Townhomes, Multi -Family, Manufactured) 3,479 Agriculture 1,078 Vacant (Only Commercial and Industrial Designated Land) 1,112 Infrastructure (Railway, ROW, Utility) 465 Open Space (Natural Resources, Parks and Open Space) 457 Commercial 425 Industrial 194 Source: City of Monticello Geographic Information System (GIS) 2019 Existing Land Use Data Downtown Monticello Looking East on West Broadway Street 48 LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION FUTURE LAND USE MAP DEVELOPMENT RESERVE A Development Reserve land use designation applies to a significant portion of the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area (MOAA). The Development Reserve includes 3,100 acres on the Future Land Use Map. The purpose of this designation is to serve as a growth reserve that maintains lands for agricultural, rural residential or other similar permitted uses until such time those lands are developed for other uses. Future uses could include residential, commercial or industrial development. As described previously, the Development Reserve is a long-term tertiary growth objective for the City. Future development and change of use would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS Monticello has approximately 3,484 acres of land currently used for residential purposes. The majority of this land, 3,127 acres or roughly 90%, is developed with single-family homes. The remaining 357 acres accommodates a limited variety of attached single- and multi -family housing types, including townhomes, duplexes, multi -story apartment buildings, and manufactured homes. There are approximately 4,496 acres of land designated for residential use on the Future Land Use Map, including 3,374 acres for single-family homes and 1,122 acres for a variety of mixed and multi -family style housing types. This acreage is projected to accommodate the existing uses and future anticipated housing needs in the City over the next twenty years consistent with the Primary Growth Strategy. This acreage does not include the 49 acres of Downtown Mixed - Use and 174 acres of Commercial/Residential Flex (both described in the following section on commercial land use) which also have potential to contain future residential development. The Future Land Use Plan establishes six different residential designations to achieve a variety of housing and neighborhood character that differ between housing type, scale and form, and density. Three designations allow and encourage a range of new single-family, multi -family and mixed housing types and densities. The purpose of the residential designations is to characterize and preserve neighborhoods, promote a range of housing types and housing stock diversity, continue to provide areas for single-family homes, and encourage the infill development of small -lot single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums, senior housing and mixed or alternative styles of multi -family development. TABLE 3.2: FUTURE LAND USE RESIDENTIAL ACREAGES CategoriesLand Use ag Estate Residential 1,102 Low -Density Residential 2,198 Traditional Residential 74 Mixed Neighborhood 635 Mixed -Density Residential 348 Manufactured Home 135 Low -Density There is ample available land that could be developed for low-density, single- family residential uses and create new neighborhoods. Two land uses, Estate Residential and Low -Density Residential, will guide new single-family residential neighborhoods in the City. By 2040, the Comprehensive Plan envisions low density single-family uses and conservation style development in these areas of the City and contiguous to the MOAA. Generally, an average density of 4 housing units per acre characterizes single-family neighborhoods but these areas could likely be developed between 3-6 units per acre depending on utility infrastructure, sensitive natural resources, conservation style development, developer preferences and project specifics. Other types of single-family housing styles, including small -lot development and attached single-family homes is encouraged in this and other residential land use designations. Eastwood Knoll Residential Property, Source: City of Monticello 56 LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION The Missing Middle Housing consists of multi- unit housing types such as duplexes, fourplexes, bungalow courts, and mansion apartments no bigger than a large house, These housing types are often integrated into blocks with primarily single-family homes, provide diverse housing choices and generate enough density to support transit and locally -serving commercial amenities. Although many of these are a common feature in pre-war building stocks, these housing types have become much less common. Ul—K - wNN V5E cOURTVARD euNGnLau ccvRT TWPLEx/ APARTMENT` DE.AcwED .. D1P�" rcuRP�Ex Hp1,I51NG----------- MI551NG MIDDLE Source: Opticos Design, Inc. Traditional Residential and Mixed Neighborhood Two new designations have been applied to both older and newer areas of the City in effort to capture correlating neighborhood types and compatibility with existing uses while allowing opportunities for development, improvement and growth. The existing neighborhoods surrounding and emanating from the downtown are designated as Mixed Neighborhood to recognize this area's potential for additional density and mixed housing types with neighborhood scaled commercial uses and services. Commercial uses are considered minor and are only intended for small, neighborhood serving uses. They should only be located on minor arterials or higher street classification. There may be other locations appropriate for these designations. A smaller Traditional Neighborhood designation has been applied to portions of the riverfront and properties along River Street and Broadway Avenue where the street network and land parcels similar to older, traditional neighborhoods with residential -scaled streets, sidewalks, large street trees and mature housing stock. Mixed -Density Residential A Mixed -Density Residential designation encourages a wide range of housing types, densities and residential development between 8-25 dwelling units per acre. This designation applies primarily along the 7th Street corridor, south along State Highway 25, and other pockets of the City where higher densities and mixed housing types is encouraged, such as near the Downtown. The broad density range promotes a wide variety of housing types including small lot single-family, apartments, condominiums, and townhomes. This designation may be allowed in proximity to other medium to high density residential areas, however the nature and concentration of existing residential uses shall be carefully considered to avoid an over concentration of these uses. For example, there may be some locations more appropriate for small -lot single family development, and others where a four-story multi -family building is the best choice. This will be determined by the parcel size, surrounding land uses, and the existing form and scale of the neighborhood. In locations where the Mixed -Density Residential designation is applied adjacent to the low-density residential uses, new residential development should be of similar mass, scale and architectural character to existing neighborhoods. Manufactured Home Two manufactured home neighborhoods exist in Monticello. These include the West Side Park and River Terrace along River Street and Kjellberg's Manufactured Home Park along State Highway 25 in the southern part of the City. The intent of the designation is to recognize and maintain these neighborhoods as locations for manufactured housing types. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 57 TABLE 3.7 FUTURE LAND USE ACREAGES Note: This acreage includes both developed and undeveloped land within the City and MOAA. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 63 COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL FLEX (CRF) The purpose of the Commercial Residential Flex designation is to provide limited locations where commercial and residential uses may be allowed and located in close proximity to each other. Mixed-use buildings are typically not appropriate in this designation although they may be considered at discretion of the City. Rather, the intent is to provide locations where a range of compatible uses can be established close to one another. This is a hybrid designation that allows a range of uses including residential, professional office, personal and professional services, hotels, retail and restaurants, entertainment uses and educational services. The goal is to create an urban mix of uses and provide the opportunity for inventive, flexible development standards characteristic of an urban lifestyle center. Commercial • Office/Retail • Professional Service • Restaurants • Hotels • Entertainment Residential • Mixed -Density Residential • Senior Living Facility Public/institutional • Educational Centers Recreational • Plaza • Public Space • Parks/Playgrounds Primary Mode Vehicular with access to collectors and arterials Transit or shuttle service Secondary Mode Pedestrian -friendly streetscape Bicycle facilities and parking • PUD Standards • Density (Low to High Density Residential) • Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.30-0.50 '♦1 2018 Correlating J Zoning District PUD Planned Unit Development MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 79 CITY OF MONTICELLO Housing Needs & Market Demand Executive Summary Mo ce noOF GENERAL HOUSING CONDITIONS ABOUT THE MONTICELLO HOUSING MARKET: Monticello has several strengths as a community that drive the housing market - it is well positioned within the region with easy access to transportation, has amenities that attract a wide range of household types, and - especially when compared to the larger Metro - many housing options that are relatively more affordable. Though Monticello has housing that is relatively affordable when considering incomes for the larger region, overall incomes for residents of the City are less than in studied regional peer communities, Wright County, and the 1 1 -County Metro. But there are differences between income by tenure (rent vs. own). In the ownership market, many homes that would be considered "affordable" to moderate -income residents are disproportionately purchased by households with that can easily afford them - spending much less than they could potentially afford. This indicates that these households are actively seeking out housing that is extremely affordable to them - as they have the choice to purchase in other areas, but are attracted to the City for its combination of amenities and affordability. Even with these existing homes, values and costs of housing have been increasing quickly, doubling in value since 2010, with cost per square foot increasing more quickly than regional peer communties. For renters who are residents of the City, most are much lower-income than their owner counterparts. Through this study, residents frequently discussed two disparate themes - one that there is a perception of an excess of affordable housing in the City, the other being that there is a lack of affordable housing that needs to be addressed through new development. Data for the City implies a middleground: there are many units with rents between what would be colloquially considered "affordable" and "luxury" rental housing. In general, rents are increasing in line with incomes - though there are many major occupation groups with incomes that do not support the levels of rent that exist in the City. Overall, the City could add up to 265 income - restricted units that would serve residents already living in the City that don't currently have access to housing affordable to them. Overall, vacancy in the market is tight and decreasing. Bringing new units online can help to relax the tension and increasing cost in the market, but new units are needed that serve residents of all incomes, not solely low- or high-income households. Though the City does not act as a master developer of housing, housing supply that meets the needs of local employers and employees should remain a top consideration in zoning updates, regulation and fees, and providing incentive to increase specific types of housing stock, whether entry-level or step-up. GENERAL CONDITIONS IMPACTING THE HOUSING MARKET: • Recent increase in average household size indicates more households with young children (p• 6) • Aging households are the fastest increasing demographic since 2010 (p. 7) • Aging households will be a significant portion of households through 2050 (p. 10) • Households with children will continue to increase, driving need for larger units (p. 10) • Monticello residents have lower average incomes compared to peer communities (p. 11) • Monticello residents have lower degrees of educational attainment compared to the County (p. 12) • Common occupation groups in the City indicate a need for affordable housing, especially for entry-level positions (p. 14) • Large shares of residents (42% as of 2015) commute into metro counties daily for work. Forty-eight percent of survey respondents indicated Twin Cities or a suburb as place of employment (p. 15) • Housing unit production has not kept pace with new households moving to the area, decreasing vacancy and increasing cost (p. 17) City of Monticello Housing Needs and Demand OWNER 8c RENTAL FINDINGS MAJOR OWNERSHIP MARKET FINDINGS • Though the majority of ownership housing is single-family detached, there are also many attached ownership units (p. 48) • Owners make up a smaller portion of the overall housing market than in most regional communities (p. 50) • The majority of owners in Monticello (53%) have incomes above the median for the entire Metro region ($103,400 in 2020) (p. 51) • Most homeowners can comfortably afford their current housing costs (p. 55) • There is an ample supply of homes affordable to households at 50% AMI - though 4 out of 5 are owned by higher -income households (p. 55) • Though affordable homes exist in the market, residents still identified the largest negative aspect of the market as lack of affordability, with more than half of survey respondents indicating that affordable housing is becoming harder to find (p. 55) • There are generally more affordable ownership opportunities in the city core, though attached ownership units are affordable in many areas (p. 57) • Many households are remaining in their housing longer than the 7 -year national average (p. 58) • Since 2014, home costs have drastically outpaced income growth, reducing affordability and access for potential homebuyers (p. 59) • The median home cost has more than doubled since 2010 (p. 59) • Cost per square foot has increased more in Monticello than in peer communities studied (p. 60) • The median starter home in the City is approximately affordable to households earning 80% AMI and above (p. 61) • Monticello has the current highest Sales:List price ratio among peer communities (p. 65) • There is an opportunity for missing middle townhouse redevelopment in the core city (p. 67) MAJOR RENTAL MARKET FINDINGS: • There is good geographic distribution of rental units throughout the City (p. 26) • Renter households have been increasing slightly as a total percentage of City households since 2010 (p. 29) • Lower-income households are much more likely to be renters (p. 29) • Rental housing in the City is easily accessible within the region, with good access and amenities (p. 30) • Monticello has the 2nd highest rate of renter households among peer communities studied (p. 30) • Rates of cost burden is much higher for renter than owner households (p. 31) • There are significant housing gaps at both the top and bottom of the rental housing market (low- and high-cost) (p. 32) • There is a lack of units appropriately priced for low-income households already living in the City (265 units), indicating need for subsidized, income -restricted units (p. 32) • Most renters that are housing cost burdened pay more than 50% of their income toward housing costs (p. 33) • There are very few rental options in 2-4 unit structures in the City (p. 36) • New units are needed to bring the vacancy rate back to healthy and balanced levels (p. 39) • 3+ bedroom units will be needed at all price points for projected household growth (p. 40) • Fiber internet is a key rental amenity that is attractive to households throughout the region (p. 41) • Housing subsidies (both local and state/ federal) will be needed to offset increasing construction costs and ensure lower-income households can afford rental costs (p. 44) Executive Summary 4 UNIT DEMAND This study projects the need for net new housing of various types through 2025, including units to accomodate growth and units to restore healthy vacancy rates. Two growth scenarios are offered - above (2.4%) and below (1.7%) Monticello 2040 projections. New - Housing Demand - New Affordable 93 units New Mid -Level 75 units New High Market 19 units Demand Demand Demand Additional Need for 52 units Additional Need for 32 units Additional Need for 19 units Vacancy Vacancy Vacancy Total Affordable 145 units Total Mid -Level Need 107 units Total High Marker 38 units Need Need Total Unit Need = 290 units New - D- - New Affordable 127 units New Mid -Level 102 units New High Market 25 units Demand Demand Demand Additional Need for 54 units Additional Need for 34 units Additional Need for 20 units Vacancy Vacancy Vacancy Total Affordable 181 units Total Mid -Level Need 136 units Total High Market 45 units Need lNeed L AL Total Unit Need = 362 units Unit need is also calculated for senior and aging households as part of this study. Due to Monticello's amenities within the region, slightly higher rates of in -migration are projected for senior households. All demand calculations and recommendations are found on pages 96-108 of the full study. City of Monticello Housing Needs and Demand Planning Commission Agenda — 09/05/23 4A. Community Development Director's Report Council Action on/related to Commission Recommendations • Consideration of a request for an Amendment to the Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Planned Unit Development District for proposed amendments to the PUD Design Standards Applicant: Tamarack Land Approved on the City Council consent agenda following discussion on August 28, 2023. • Consideration of a request for an Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance related to commercial animal kennels as a principal use, including Use Table, Use Specific Standards and Definitions. Applicant: City of Monticello Approved on the City Council consent agenda on August 14, 2023. Companion City Code amendments also approved on the consent agenda. • Consideration of a request for an Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance related to a correction to the approved language within Ordinance No. 799 as related to R-1, Single -Family Residential District. Applicant: City of Monticello Approved on the City Council consent agenda on August 14, 2023. Twin Pines Multi -Family The developer of the proposed Twin Pines project requested a 6 -month extension of their final plat approval. The City Council approved the extension on August 14, 2023. The new deadline for recording is February 28, 2024. Cannabis Legalization Information The City Council held a workshop on August 14, 2023 to discuss the recently adopted legislation for cannabis. A copy of the staff presentation is included for reference. The Council's workshop included discussion on four primary topic areas. A summary of the Council's direction and more recent action is provided below. • Public Use of cannabis and Wright County's ordinance prohibiting use in public places Council considered a proposed Wright County ordinance prohibiting cannabis and low -potency hemp products in public places for comment. The City of Monticello is within the jurisdiction of the ordinance. No comment was desired. Wright County adopted the ordinance on August 15, 2023. The draft ordinance is attached for reference. • Proposed Joint Powers Agreement for the administration, registration and enforcement of cannabis -related businesses The Council indicated interest in understanding more about Wright County's policies regarding cannabis sales prior to final decision on whether to participate. Planning Commission Agenda — 09/05/23 • Interim ordinance prohibiting cannabis business operations within the City of Monticello Staff's recommendation during the workshop was to proceed with an interim ordinance to allow adequate study and code development in relationship to the new law. Council's general consensus was to proceed with drafting of a proposed ordinance for hearing. On August 28, 2023, the City Council held a hearing on the interim ordinance and adopted said ordinance unanimously. A copy of the ordinance is attached for reference. Link to staff report: Agenda - 08/28/2023 (monticello.mn.us) • Municipal sales During the workshop, Council indicated support for the current staff recommendation, which is to continue to evaluate the potential sale of products at the municipal liquor store, but not to sell allowable products or consider a municipal dispensary at this time. It is anticipated that Council and Planning Commission will hold a joint workshop in November or December to begin evaluation of land use implications and provide direction on code development for cannabis uses as allowed by statute. To begin preparation, reference materials from the League of MN Cities, along with excerpts from the state statute are attached for Commission's review. Downtown Improvement Progress Council approved a contract with Meyer Contracting, Inc. on August 7, 2023 for the Downtown Roadway & Pedestrian Improvement project. The contractor will be working to complete as much of the project this construction season as possible, with the remainder of the work to be completed in 2024. View the full report here: Agenda - 08/07/2023 (monticello.mn.us) Construction continues on the private Block 52 development. The staff team has been working with the developer to finalize their landscaping and retaining wall plans in accordance with their approved PUD. Project Update List September's updated project listing is attached. 2 3 annabis Law City Council August 2023 .P, N- What does the new law do? • Legalizes adult -use cannabis • Possession • Home growing • Use • Manufacturing • Sale • Establishes a regulatory framework for consumer cannabis and hemp • Taxation structure including local government cannabis aid ig Key Dates August 1, 2023 • Those 21 years of age or older may, use, possess and transport specifically defined limits of cannabis on private property and residence, and premises licensed to permit on-site consumption • Grow up to 8 cannabis plants on private property, with restrictions • 2024 • Majority of rulemaking • January, 2025 (intended timeline) • Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) established • OCM issues licenses for specifically defined cannabis businesses • Local retail registration required • Cannabis and hemp -derived consumer products may only be sold in businesses licensed by the OCM ig Current City Ordinances • Cannabinoid Products Ordinance (Ordinance No. 788) • Edible cannabinoids remain legal with new requirements • City ordinance remains in place until OCM begins issuing licenses • Businesses must register with MN Dept. of Health by October 1, 2023 • Interim Ordinance for Moratorium (Ordinance No. 783) • Remains in place until August 22, 2023 • Intention is to address low -potency hemp uses along with cannabis uses, including manufacturing and distribution, as we research cannabis uses ig Definitions • Cannabis • "Adult -use cannabis product" means a cannabis product that is approved for sale by the office or is substantially similar to a product approved by the office. Adult -use cannabis product includes edible cannabis products but does not include medical cannabinoid products or lower -potency hemp edibles. • "Cannabis product" means any of the following: (1) cannabis concentrate; (2) a product infused with cannabinoids, including but not limited to tetrahydrocannabinol, extracted or derived from cannabis plants or cannabis flower; or (3) any other product that contains cannabis concentrate. (b) Cannabis product includes adult -use cannabis products, including but not limited to edible cannabis products and medical cannabinoid products. Cannabis product does not include cannabis flower, artificially derived cannabinoid, lower -potency hemp edibles, hemp -derived consumer products, or hemp -derived topical product ig ig Definitions • Lower -Potency Hem r • "Lower -potency hemp edible" means any product that: (1) is intended to be eaten or consumed as a beverage by humans; (2) contains hemp concentrate or an artificially derived cannabinoid, in combination with food ingredients; (3) is not a drug; (4) consists of servings that contain no more than five milligrams of delta -9 tetrahydrocannabinol, 25 milligrams of cannabidiol, 25 milligrams of cannabigerol, or any combination of those cannabinoids that does not exceed the identified amounts; (5) does not contain more than a combined total of 0.5 milligrams of all other cannabinoids per serving; (6) does not contain an artificially derived cannabinoid other than delta -9 tetrahydrocannabinol; (7) does not contain a cannabinoid derived from cannabis plants or cannabis flower; and (8) is a type of product approved for sale by the office or is substantially similar to a product approved by the office, including but not limited to products that resemble nonalcoholic beverages, candy, and baked goods. General City FAQs • Cities may not prohibit the possession, transportation, or use of cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products authorized by the new law. • Cities may not require additional licenses other than the cannabis licenses issued by the OCM. • OCM will forward applications for cities to certify whether the proposed cannabis business complies with local zoning ordinance and with the state fire and building code. The OCM may not issue a license to a cannabis business that does not meet local zoning and land use laws. • OCM will provide the city with 30 days to provide input on the application; opportunity to provide any additional information relevant to the OCM's decision on license, including but not limited to identifying concerns about the proposed location of a cannabis business. • Before a cannabis business begins retail sales, required to register with the city in which it is located. • Cities with retail registration process required to conduct compliance checks on retail cannabis businesses. • Cities may impose an initial retail fee of $500 or up to half the amount of the applicable initial license fee charged by the OCM, whichever is less. • Cities that issue cannabis retailer registrations may, by ordinance, limit the number of licensed cannabis businesses to no fewer than one registration for every 12,500 residents. • County registration provision City Discussion & Discussion: Short Term • Public Place Use • County Ordinance • Interim Ordinance for Prohibition of Operation of Cannabis Businesses • Wright County Joint Powers Agreement • Municipal Sales • Long -Term: City ordinance development 0- - ig 11 CXHMAS1S SN®P Public Place Use Wright County will hold a hearing on August 15, 2023 for consideration of adopting an ordinance that will be applicable within the legal boundaries of Wright County, including the municipalities, prohibiting the following: (A) No person shall use cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products in a public place or a place of public accommodation unless the premises is an establishment or an event licensed to permit on-site consumption of adult -use cannabis flower and adult use cannabis products. See State Legislation Article 4, Sec. 19 codified as Minn. Stat. 152.0263, Subd. 5, or successor statute. (B) No person shall vaporize or smoke cannabis flower, cannabis products, artificially derived cannabinoids, or hemp -derived consumer products in any location where the smoke, aerosol, or vapor would be inhaled by a minor. See State Legislation Article 1, Sec. 9 codified as Minn. Stat. 342.09, Subd. 1 (b)(9) or successor statute. ig Public Place Use • Within the proposed Wright County ordinance "Public Place" is defined as: A public park or trail, public street or sidewalk, any enclosed, indoor area used by the general public, including, but not limited to, theaters, restaurants, bars, food establishments, places licensed to sell intoxicating liquor, wine, or malt beverages, retail businesses, gyms, common areas in buildings, public shopping areas, auditoriums, arenas, or other places of public accommodation. • Authority to enact a county -wide ordinance is under the public health authority as articulated in Minn. Stat. 145A.05. • Staff supports the County ordinance and is seeking Council direction on any position of the City for representation at the public hearing. ig Interim Ordinance • Cities may adopt an interim ordinance if: • It is conducting studies and/or has authorized a study to be conducted. • Has held or has scheduled a hearing for the purpose of considering adoption or amendment of reasonable restriction on the time, place, and manner of the operation of a cannabis business as defined in the new law. • Before adopting an interim ordinance, the city must hold a public hearing on the issue. The interim ordinance may be in place until Jan. 1, 2025. • Does not apply to the sale or production of low -potency hemp edible products. • Staff recommends adoption of the interim ordinance and study on the new law, including: • Review the proposed joint powers agreement for administration, registration and enforcement, and Wright County's role absent a joint powers agreement, including County attorney and sheriff's office • City limitations and restrictions as allowed by statute, including direction on the desired number of licenses (no less than 1 per 12,500) and buffer allowances • Understanding of cannabis business licensures as allowed by the new law, along with recommended land use and zoning regulations • Role of Office of Cannabis Management as related to local regulation and enforcement ig Joint Powers Agreement • Delegates administration, registration review and enforcement for cannabis businesses to Wright County • County's ordinances would apply in the City; does not preclude the City from adopting ordinances for number of registrations or buffers City retains zoning authority The more restrictive ordinance would be enforced City will retain local cannabis aid; County retains registration fee Items for addition discussion include: • Consent to ordinances • Compliance and enforcement Staff recommendation is to indicate interest in learning more, but with discussion on County's policy direction and enforcement. ig ria � 4 Staff recommendation is to indicate interest in learning more, but with discussion on County's policy direction and enforcement. ig I1 Municipal I Sales Municipal Liquor • Edible cannabinoid products allowed to be sold at exclusive liquor stores, including municipal liquor stores. • The ability of cities to sell cannabinoid products at a liquor store is unique to Minnesota and may create new and complex coverage and liability questions around these products. • The League and the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) are working on guidance for cities considering selling cannabinoid products at their municipal liquor stores. • Current staff recommendation is to defer sale at this time. Municipal Cannabis Retail Store • The new law authorizes cities to operate a municipal cannabis retail store. Current staff recommendation is to defer due to the legal and insurance ramifications. ig COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE No.: 23-3 ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE OF CANNABIS AND CANNABIS DERIVED PRODUCTS IN PUBLIC PLACES THE COUNTY BOARD OF WRIGHT COUNTY HEREBY ORDAINS: ARTICLE I — CHAPTER 97 CANNABIS REGULATION Sec. 1. Create CHAPTER 97 — CANNABIS REGULATION and insert the following: 97.01. PURPOSE, INTENT AND STATUTORY AUTHORITY (A) Statement of Purpose andlntent. This Ordinance is adopted by the Wright County Commissioners for the purpose of protecting public health and safety by the use of Cannabis and cannabis derived products in public places and places of public accommodation within Wright County. By enacting 2023 Session Law, Chapter 63, H. F. No. 100 [hereinafter referred to "State Legislation"], the Minnesota Legislature passed the adult -use cannabis bill. Under that bill, the adult use, possession and personal growing of cannabis became legal on August 1, 2023. State legislation authorizes adoption of a local ordinance establishing a petty misdemeanor offense for public use of cannabis. See State Legislation Article 4, Sec. 19, Minn. Stat. 152.0263, Subd. 5, or successor statute. Wright County (hereinafter "the County") recognizes the risks that unintended access and use of cannabis products and exposure to cannabis and its effects present to the health, welfare, and safety of youth and thee�public in Wright County. State legislation authorizes adoption of ordinances to regulate actual or potential threats to the public health. See Minn. Stat. 145A.05, subds. 1 and 7. The County wishes to be proactive in protecting public health and safety by enacting regulations that will mitigate threats presented to the public and public health by the public use of cannabis. (B) Statutory Authority. This Ordinance is enacted pursuant to 2023 Session Law, Chapter 63, H. F. No. 100 [hereinafter referred to "State Legislation"]; State Legislation Article 1, Sec. 1 Minn. Stat. 342.01; State Legislation Article 1, Sec. 9 Minn. Stat. 342.09 Subd. 1(b) or successor statute; State Legislation Sec. 9 Minn. Stat. 342.09, Subd. 1 (b)(9) or successor statute; State Legislation Minn. Stat. 342.09 Subd.l(a)(7) or successor statute, and State Legislation Article 4, Sec. 19 Minn. Stat. 152.0263, Subd. 5, or successor statute; and Minn. Stat. 145A.05. 97.02 DEFINITIONS Except as may otherwise be provided or clearly implied by context, all terms shall be given their commonly accepted definitions. The following words, terms, and phrases, when used in this ordinance, shall have the meanings ascribed to them except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. (A) Adult -use cannabis flower. "Adult -use cannabis flower" means cannabis flower that is approved for sale by the office or is substantially similar to a product approved by the office. Adult -use cannabis flower does not include medical cannabis flower, hemp plant parts, or hemp - derived consumer products. (B) Adult -use cannabis products. "Adult -use cannabis products" means a cannabis product that is approved for sale by the office or is substantially similar to a product approved by the office. Adult -use cannabis product includes edible cannabis products but does not include medical cannabinoid products or lower -potency hemp edibles. (C) Cannabis flower. "Cannabis flower" means the harvested flower, bud, leaves, and stems of a cannabis plant. Cannabis flower includes adult -use cannabis flower and medical cannabis flower. Cannabis flower does not include cannabis seed, hemp plant parts, or hemp -derived consumer products. (D) Cannabis plant. "Cannabis plant" means all parts of the plant of the genus nus Cannabis that isrig or has not been harvested and has a delta -9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis. (E) Cannabis product. "Cannabis product" means any of the following_ (1) cannabis concentrate; (2) a product infused with cannabinoids, including but not limited to tetrahvdrocannabinol, extracted or derived from cannabis plants or cannabis flower: or (3) any other product that contains cannabis concentrate. (F) Hemp derived consumer products. (1) "Hemp derived consumer products" means a product intended for human or animal consumption, does not contain cannabis flower or cannabis concentrate, and: (i) contains or consists of hemp plant parts; or (ii) contains hemp concentrate or artificially derived cannabinoids in combination with other ingredients. (2) Hemp -derived consumer products does not include artificially derived cannabinoids, lower -potency hemp edibles, hemp -derived topical products, hemp fiber products, or hemprg ain. (G)Lower-potency hemp edible. A "lower -potency hemp edible" means any product that: (1) is intended to be eaten or consumed as a beverage by humans; (2) contains hemp concentrate or an artificially derived cannabinoid; in combination with food ingredients; (3) is not a drug; (4) consists of servings that contain no more than five milligrams of delta -9 tetrahydrocannabinol, 25 milligrams of cannabidiol, 25 milligrams of cannabi eg rol, or any combination of those cannabinoids that does not exceed the identified amounts; (5) does not contain more than a combined total of 0.5 milligrams of all other cannabinoids per sendM (6) does not contain an artificially derived cannabinoid other than delta - 9 tetrahydrocannabinol; (7) does not contain a cannabinoid derived from cannabis plants or cannabis flower; and (8) is a type of product approved for sale by the office or is substantially similar to a product approved by the office, including but not limited to products that resemble nonalcoholic beverages, candy, and bakedog ods. (1) Public place. A "public place," means a public park or trail, public street or sidewalk, any enclosed, indoor area used by the general public, including, but not limited to, theaters, restaurants, bars, food establishments, places licensed to sell intoxicating liquor, wine, ormalt beverages, retail businesses, gyms, common areas in buildings, public shoppingareas, reas, auditoriums, arenas, or other places of public accommodation. (1) Place of public accommodation. "Place of public accommodation" means a business, refreshment, entertainment, recreation, or transportation facility of any kind, whose goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations are extended, offered, sold, or otherwise made available to the public." (J) Exceptions to public place or place of public accommodation. "A public place" or "a place of public accommodation" does not include the following: 1. a private residence, including the individual's curtilage or yard. 2. a private property, noteg nerally accessible by the public, unless the individual is explicitly prohibited from consuming cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products on the property by the owner of the property; or 3. on the premises of an establishment or event licensed to permit on-site consumption. (1) Smoking. "Smoking" means inhaling, exhaling, burnin , or r carrng any lighted or heated cigar, cigarette, pipe, or any other lighted or heated product containing cannabis flower, cannabis products, artificially derived cannabinoids, or hemp -derived consumer products. Smoking includes cgMing or using an activated electronic delivery device for human consumption through inhalation of aerosol or vapor from the product. 97.03 JURISDICTION This Ordinance shall be applicable within the legal boundaries of Wright County. 97.04 PROHIBITED ACTS (A) No person shall use cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp - derived consumer products in a public place or a place of public accommodation unless the premises is an establishment or an event licensed to permit on-site consumption of adult -use cannabis flower and adult use cannabis products. See State Legislation Article 4, Sec. 19 codified as Minn. Stat. 152.0263, Subd. 5, or successor statute. (B) No person shall vaporize or smoke cannabis flower, cannabis products, artificially derived cannabinoids, or hemp -derived consumer products in any location where the smoke, aerosol, or vapor would be inhaled by a minor. See State Legislation Article 1, Sec. 9 codified as Minn. Stat. 342.09, Subd. 1 (b)(9) or successor statute. 97.05 PENALTY (A) Criminal Penalty. A violation of this ordinance chapter shall be a petty misdemeanor having a fine payable up to $300. Nothing in this ordinance prohibits the County from seeking prosecution for an alleged violation. 97.06 SEVERABILITY If any section or provision of this ordinance is held invalid, such invalidity will not affect other sections or provisions that can be given force and effect without the invalidated section or provision. 97.07 EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage_ and publications as required by law. ADOPTED by the Wright County Board of Commissioners this day of 2023. Darek Vetsch Chair, Wright County Board of Commissioners ATTEST: Lee Kelly Wright County Administrator CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 808 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE OPERATION OF CANNABIS BUSINESSES The City Council of the City of Monticello does ordain: SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. A. By enacting 2023 Session Laws Chapter 63, the Minnesota Legislature enacted Minn. Stat. chapter 342, legalizing adult -use cannabis and permitting the operation of cannabis businesses and the sale of cannabis flower and cannabis products for human consumption. This law creates a new agency, the Office of Cannabis Management, to regulate the sales of cannabis products. B. The new law does enact some requirements for production, labeling, and testing, and sale of cannabis products at the state government level. However, the new law creates uncertainty that will need to be resolved by the passage of further regulations by the Office. C. The new law establishes that the sale of cannabis products are still subject to local planning and zoning restrictions, and must comply with local zoning code. The new law provides no guidance on how cities are to zone the new businesses, leaving it to local control. D. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 342.13, the City is authorized to adopt an interim ordinance protecting the planning process and the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. Under Section 342.13, such ordinance may remain in effect until January 1, 2025. E. Pursuant to its general police powers, including but not limited to, Minn. Stat. § 412.221, subd. 32, the City may enact regulations regarding to promote the health, safety, order, convenience, and the general welfare of the City. This power permits the City to implement a moratorium to study the sales, testing, manufacturing, and distribution of cannabis products to determine if regulations are necessary for the sake of good order of the City. F. The City Council finds that it is necessary to study the application of 2023 Session Laws Chapter 63, and the products, uses, and businesses related thereto, in order to assess the necessity for and efficacy of regulation and restrictions relating to the sales, testing, manufacturing, and distribution of cannabis flower, cannabis products, and lower -potency products including through zoning ordinances, in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of its residents. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS: The following terms when used in this ordinance shall mean: Official controls. "Official controls" or "controls" means ordinances and regulations which control the physical development of the city or any part thereof or any detail thereof and 227566v1 implement the general objectives of the comprehensive plan. Official controls include ordinances establishing zoning, subdivision controls, site plan regulations, sanitary codes, building codes, and official maps. Cannabis Business. "Cannabis Business" has the meaning given in Minn. Stat. § 342.01, subd. 14. Cannabis Flower. "Cannabis Flower" means the harvested flower, bud, leaves, and stems of a cannabis plant. Cannabis Product. "Cannabis Product" means a product infused with cannabinoids extracted or derived from cannabis plants or cannabis flower, including but not limited to tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). SECTION 3. INTENT AND AUTHORIZATION: A. It is the intent of this ordinance to allow the City of Monticello time to complete an in-depth study concerning adoption of revisions of the City's official controls for the manufacturing, testing, distributing, and selling of Cannabis Flower and Cannabis Products, and the operation of Cannabis Businesses. B. City staff is directed and authorized to conduct a study of the City's official controls that may need to be adopted or amended to protect the public health, safety, and welfare as they relate to the manufacturing, testing, distributing, and selling of Cannabis Flower and Cannabis Products, and the operation of Cannabis Businesses. SECTION 4. TEMPORARY PROHIBITION: A. Pending the completion of the above referenced study and the adoption of appropriate official controls, the following is prohibited within the City: The manufacturing, distributing, and selling of Cannabis Flower and Cannabis Products, and the operation of any Cannabis Business. B. This moratorium does not apply to the selling, testing, manufacturing, or distributing of THC Products related to the Medical Cannabis Program as administered by the Minnesota Department of Health, provided that such activity is done in accordance with the regulations and laws of Minnesota regarding Medical Cannabis. SECTION 5. ENFORCEMENT. The City may enforce this Ordinance by mandamus, injunctive relief, or other appropriate civil remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Administrator, in consultation with the City Attorney, to initiate any legal action deemed necessary to secure compliance with this Ordinance. A violation of this Ordinance is also subject to the City's general penalty in City Code § 10.99. 2 227566v1 SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and shall remain in effect until January 1, 2025, or until the adoption of the official controls being studied, whichever occurs first. PASSED this 28th day of August, 2023 by the City Council for the City of Monticello. CITY OF MONTICELLO Lloyd'ga ay ATTEST: jJn4niferhr ib r, City Clerk AYES: Gabler, Hilgart, Martie and Murdoff NAYS: None Councilmember Hinz absent 227566vl LALEAGUE C MINNESOTA CITIES Adult -Use Cannabis: What Cities Need to Know Published: June 12, 2023 A new law enacted at the end of the 2023 legislative session legalizes adult -use cannabis in Minnesota and establishes a regulatory framework over the cannabis industry. Since the enactment of the law, the League of Minnesota Cities has been researching and collecting information from state agencies and stakeholders to answer questions pertaining to local regulatory authority, law enforcement, taxing, and employment. Read the full bill The following frequently asked questions (FAQs) aim to provide information to cities about the new law to assist local governments in making decisions related to the law. The League will continually update this information as necessary. Get answers to FAQs regarding the new law on adult -use cannabis General information Q1. What does the new law do? Q2. How much cannabis can aperson legally -possess? Q3. Are cannabis products legal under federal regulations? _Q . Can a person grow their own cannabis? Q5. Does the Clean Indoor Air Act apply to cannabisproducts? Q6. What types of licenses will the OCM issue? Q7. Can cannabis start to be sold now? Q8. Under the new law, where can adult -use cannabis be sold? Q9. Could my city's municipal liquor store sell adult -use cannabis? -10. Can my city have a municipal cannabis retail store? Taxation and revenue Q11. How will these new products be taxed? Q12. Can our city impose its own cannabis tax? Q13. Do sales taxes apply? Q14. Who receives taxes collected from the sale of cannabis products? Q15. What is considered a "taxable cannabis product retailer?" Q16. How much revenue will cities receive from the local government cannabis aid fund? Q17. When will cities receive revenue from the local government cannabis aid account? Enforcement and public safety Q18. How is the new law enforced? Q19. What are penalties for someone selling edible cannabis products that do not meet the state's requirements? Q20. Can a person still be charged with possession of cannabis products? Q21. Can a person still be charged with sale of cannabis products? Q22. Can a person be charged with a crime for cultivating cannabis? Q23. Can a person be charged with a crime for using cannabis in public? Q24. How do our officers determine if a driver is under the influence of adult -use cannabis? Q25. Is it a crime to use cannabis products while operating a motor vehicle? Q26. Is it a crime to possess cannabis products in a motor vehicle? Q27. Could cities prohibit the sale of adult -use cannabis entirely? Q28. Is our city required to adopt regulations under the new law? Q29. Are prior convictions for cannabis use expunged and what is the city's role in that process? City regulation Q30. Can the city require sellers to have a city -issued license? Q31. When is our city required to issue retail registration to a cannabis retail business? Q32. Can a retail registration issued by our city be transferred? Q33. Is our city required to conduct compliance checks on businesses with a cannabis retail registration? Q34. Can our city charge a fee for a cannabis retail registration? -35. Can my city limit the number of cannabis retailer licenses issued in our city? Q36. How does this impact my city's existing license for THC products? Q37. Which state agency is charged with regulating edible cannabinoid products until the OCM begins licensing cannabis products? Q38. What changes have been made to the edible cannabinoid law adopted in 2022? Q39. Can edible cannabinoid products be sold for on-site consumption? Q40. Will I be able to prohibit cannabis eventsin my city? Q41. How does this impact my city's existing THC license program? Q42. How does the new law impact my city's existing THC moratorium? Q43. Can the city's zoning regulation restrict where a business can operate? Q44. Can cities adopt a moratorium prohibiting the sale, manufacturing, or distribution of adult -use cannabis to study the issue? Q45: What if mycity has complaints about a licensed cannabis business? Q46: Can a city deny a liquor license if they find that the business is selling cannabis or low - potency hemp products without a license? Q47. Can a city suspend or revoke a tobacco license if they find that they are selling cannabis or low -potency hemp products without a license? City employment and personnel issues Q48. Does the new law allowing adult -use cannabis change anything about how we do drug testing for CDL holders? Q49. Does the new law change anything related to employees who carry a firearm? Q50. Besides positions requiring a CDL or carrying a firearm, are there any other positions which are not affected by the new law? Q51. Can we still prohibit employees from being under the influence of cannabis while at work? Does the League have a model policy with updated language? Q52. If an employee is injured while being under the influence of cannabis at work, are they still entitled to workers' compensation benefits? Q53. Can employees be in possession of edibles or other cannabis products while at work? Q54. Do we need to change anything in our collective bargaining agreement (CBA) regarding discipline of employees who use cannabis products? Q55. Can employees use cannabisproducts off-duty? Q56. How does this impact the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act? Q57. Should mycity continue to include cannabis as a pre-employment panel screen for my_ non-DOT/safety-sensitive employees? General information Q1. What does the new law do? Al. The new law legalizes the possession, use, manufacturing, and sale of certain cannabis products within the state. It establishes the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM), which is charged with, among other things, enforcing an organized system of regulation for the cannabis industry and the hemp consumer industry. The law also: • Establishes labor standards for the use of cannabis and hemp products by employees and testing of employees. • Establishes expungement procedures for certain individuals previously convicted of a crime related to cannabis. Possession, use, and home growth under this new law will be legal beginning Aug. 1, 2023, and legal sales are expected to begin in January of 2025. Various other effective dates are noted throughout these FAQs as they apply. Access the Office of Cannabis Management's website Return to top of page Q2. How much cannabis can a person legally possess? A2. This law allows a person of 21 years of age or older to: • Use, possess, or transport cannabis paraphernalia. • Possess 2 ounces or less of cannabis flower in a public place. • Possess 2 pounds or less of cannabis flower in a person's residence. • Possess or transport 8 grams or less of adult -use cannabis concentrate. • Possess or transport edible products infused with a total of 800 milligrams or less of tetrahydrocannabinol. • Give away cannabis flower and products in an amount that is legal for a person to possess in public. The law authorizes an individual to use adult -use cannabis flower and adult -use cannabis products: • In a private residence including the individual's curtilage or yard. • On private property, unless the owner of the property prohibits the use of the products. • On the premises of an establishment or event licensed to permit on-site consumption. Return to top of page Q3. Are cannabis products legal under federal regulations? A3. Marijuana remains a Schedule I drug under federal law, meaning it is illegal, with limited exceptions, to grow, process, sell or possess marijuana from a federal standpoint. Return to top of page Q4. Can a person grow their own cannabis? A4. The law authorizes a person to cultivate up to eight cannabis plants, of which four or fewer may be mature, flowering plants provided that it is in an enclosed, locked space that is not open to public view. Return to top of page Q5. Does the Clean Indoor Air Act apply to cannabis products? A5. A person may not use cannabis flower, cannabis products, or hemp -derived consumer products in a manner that involves the inhalation of smokes, aerosol, or vapor at any location where smoking is prohibited under the Clean Indoor Air Act. Return to top of page Q6. What types of licenses will the OCM issue? A6. The OCM will issue the following types of licenses: • Cannabis microbusiness. • Cannabis mezzobusiness. • Cannabis cultivator. • Cannabis manufacturer. • Cannabis retailer. • Cannabis wholesaler. • Cannabis transporter. • Cannabis testing facility. • Cannabis event organizer. • Cannabis delivery service. • Lower -potency hemp edible manufacturer. • Medical cannabis cultivator. • Medical cannabis processor. • Medical cannabis retailer. Return to top of page Q7. Can cannabis start to be sold now? A7. Cannabis will not be able to be sold until the Office of Cannabis Management is established and able to issue licenses. Communication from state agencies indicate an intended timeline of January 2025 for when sales will be live to the public. Before beginning sales, a cannabis retailer must obtain a local retail registration. Any business attempting to sell cannabis products before licenses are issued should be reported to the Department of Health. Return to top of page Q8. Under the new law, where can adult -use cannabis be sold? A8. Cannabis products and hemp derived consumer products may only be sold in business with a license issued by the OCM. Return to top of page Q9. Could my city's municipal liquor store sell adult -use cannabis? A9. The law adds edible cannabinoid products as an item allowed to be sold at exclusive liquor stores, including municipal liquor stores. The ability of cities to sell cannabinoid products at a liquor store is unique to Minnesota and may create new and complex coverage and liability questions around these products. The League and the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMC1T) are working on guidance for cities considering selling cannabinoid products at their municipal liquor stores. This information will be updated when such guidance is drafted. Return to top of page Q10. Can my city have a municipal cannabis retail store? A10. The new law authorizes cities to operate a municipal cannabis retail store. This is a unique opportunity for Minnesota cities and more research is needed to determine the legal ramifications of such an operation. Return to top of page Taxation and revenue Q11. How will these new products be taxed? All. A tax equal to 10% of gross receipts from retail sales of taxable cannabis products will be imposed on any taxable cannabis product retailer that sells cannabis products to customers. Return to top of page Q12. Can our city impose its own cannabis tax? Al2. Cities are prohibited from imposing a tax solely on the sale of taxable cannabis products. Return to top of page Q13. Do sales taxes apply? A13. The state sales tax and local sales taxes apply to cannabis and hemp -derived cannabinoid products. Return to top of page Q14. Who receives taxes collected from the sale of cannabis products? A14. Revenues from the retail sales of cannabis products will be divided, with 80% going to the general fund and 20% to the local government cannabis aid account. Cities will receive 50% of the amount certified to the local government cannabis aid account. Return to top of page Q15. What is considered a "taxable cannabis product retailer?" A15. A taxable cannabis product retailer is a retailer that sells any taxable cannabis products. This includes a cannabis retailer, cannabis microbusiness, cannabis mezzobusiness, and lower - potency hemp edible retailer. Minn. Stat § 295.81, subd. 1(s). Return to top of page Q16. How much revenue will cities receive from the local government cannabis aid fund? A16. Half of the amount certified in the cannabis local government aid fund will go to cities. Cities will receive a distribution proportional to the number of cannabis businesses located in the city as compared to the number of cannabis businesses in all cities. Return to top of page Q17. When will cities receive revenue from the local government cannabis aid account? A17. The gross receipts tax goes is effective for gross receipts received after June 30, 2023. The law requires the Department of Revenue to certify the amount to be paid to each city by Sept. 1, 2024, and every year after, and the full amount must be paid on Dec. 26, 2024, and every year after. Return to top of page Enforcement and public safety Q18. How is the new law enforced? A18. All licensing issues will be enforced by the Office of Cannabis Management. Until the OCM is up and running, the currently legal hemp -derived edible products under Minn. Stat. § 151.72 will be temporarily regulated by the Department of Health, which is taking over the enforcement of edible cannabis products previously done by the Board of Pharmacy. Local law enforcement may still enforce illegal possession or use crimes where applicable. Access the Department of Health's site on the temporaryregulation of lower -potency hemp edibles Return to top of page Q19. What are penalties for someone selling edible cannabis products that do not meet the state's requirements? A19. If a retailer is found to be selling edible cannabis products that do not meet state requirements, the Department of Health may embargo the products and potentially destroy the products with the retailer paying for all court costs and fees, storage, and other proper expenses. Return to top of page Q20. Can a person still be charged with possession of cannabis products? A20. Beginning Aug. 1, 2023, the following actions are considered cannabis possession crimes: Possession of cannabis in the first degree. (Punishable by imprisonment for not more than five years or payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both). o More than 2 pounds but not more than 10 kilograms of cannabis flower. o More than 160 grams but not more than 2 kilograms of cannabis concentrate. o Edible cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products infused with more than 16 grams but not more than 200 grams of THC. Possession of cannabis in the second degree. (Punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year or payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both). o More than 1 pound but not more than 2 pounds of cannabis flower in any place other than the person's residence. • More than 80 grams but not more than 160 grams of cannabis concentrate. o Edible cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products infused with more than 8 grams but not more than 16 grams of THC. • Possession of cannabis in the third degree. (Punishable by imprisonment for not more than 90 days or payment of a fine of not more than $1,000, or both). • More than 4 ounces but not more than 1 pound of cannabis flower in any place other than the person's residence. o More than 16 grams but not more than 80 grams of cannabis concentrate. o Edible cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products infused with more than 1,600 milligrams but not more than 8 grams of THC. • Possession of cannabis in the fourth degree. (Punishable as a petty misdemeanor). o More than 2 ounces but not more than 4 ounces of cannabis flower in any place other than the person's residence. o More than 8 grams but not more than 16 grams of cannabis concentrate. o Edible cannabinoid products infused with more than 800 milligrams but not more than 1,600 milligrams of THC. Return to top of page Q21. Can a person still be charged with sale of cannabis products? A21. Beginning Aug. 1, 2023, the following actions are considered cannabis sale crimes: • Sale of cannabis in the first degree. Punishable by imprisonment for not more than five years or to a payment of a fine of not more than $10,000 or both if a person unlawfully sells more than 2 ounces of cannabis flower; more than 8 grams of cannabis concentrate; or edible cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products infused with more than 800 milligrams of THC: o To a minor and the defendant is more than 36 months older than the minor. o Within 10 years of two or more convictions of sale in the second or third degree. • Within 10 years of a conviction of first degree • Sale of cannabis in the second degree. May be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both if an adult: o Unlawfully sells more than 2 ounces of cannabis flower; more than 8 grams of cannabis concentrate; or edible cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products infused with more than 800 milligrams of THC: ■ In a school zone, a park zone, or a drug treatment facility; or ■ Within 10 years of a conviction of sale of cannabis in the first, second, or third degree. o Unlawfully sells cannabis flower, cannabis concentrate, edible cannabis products, lower- potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products to a minor. • Sale of cannabis in the third degree. An adult may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $1,000, or both, if the adult unlawfully sells: o More than 2 ounces of cannabis flower. o More than 8 grams of cannabis concentrate. o Edible cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products infused with more than 800 milligrams of THC. • Sale of cannabis in the fourth degree. An adult is guilty of a petty misdemeanor if they unlawfully sell: o Not more than 2 ounces of cannabis flower. o Not more than 8 grams of cannabis concentrate. o Edible cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products infused with not more than 800 milligrams of THC. A sale for no remuneration by an individual over the age of 21 to another individual over the age of 21 is not unlawful as cannabis sale in the fourth degree. • Sale of cannabis by a minor. A minor is guilty of a petty misdemeanor if the minor unlawfully sells: o Not more than 2 ounces of cannabis flower. o Not more than 8 grams of cannabis concentrate. o Edible cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products infused with not more than 800 milligrams of THC. A minor is guilty of a misdemeanor if the minor unlawfully sells: o More than 2 ounces of cannabis flower. o More than 8 grams of cannabis concentrate. o Edible cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products infused with more than 800 milligrams of THC. Return to top of page Q22. Can a person be charged with a crime for cultivating cannabis? A22. Beginning Aug. 1, 2023, the following are crimes related to the cultivation of cannabis. • Cultivation of cannabis in the first degree. A person is guilty of cultivation of cannabis in the first degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if the person unlawfully cultivates more than 23 cannabis plants. • Cultivation of cannabis in the second degree. A person is guilty of cultivation of cannabis in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both, if the person unlawfully cultivates more than 16 cannabis plants but not more than 23 cannabis plants. Return to top of page Q23. Can a person be charged with a crime for using cannabis in public? A23. Beginning Aug. 1, 2023, a city may adopt an ordinance establishing a petty misdemeanor offense for a person who unlawfully uses cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products in a public place other than the following. • A private residence including the person's curtilage or yard. • Private property not generally accessible by the public, unless the person is explicitly prohibited from consuming cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products on the property by the owner of the property. • The premises of an establishment or event licensed to permit on-site consumption. Return to top of page Q24. How do our officers determine if a driver is under the influence of adult -use cannabis? A24. Officers will need to use the same process for determining if a person is under the influence of cannabis while operating a vehicle as they would have prior to the new law being enacted. Return to top of page Q25. Is it a crime to use cannabis products while operating a motor vehicle? A25. It is a misdemeanor for a person to use cannabis flower, a cannabis product, a lower - potency hemp edible, a hemp -derived consumer product, or any other product containing an artificially derived cannabinoid in a motor vehicle when the vehicle is on a street or highway. Return to top of page Q26. Is it a crime to possess cannabis products in a motor vehicle? A26. Beginning Aug. 1, 2023, a person may be charged with a misdemeanor if they possess cannabis products in a motor vehicle on a street or highway if the products meet any of the following conditions: • Do not meet the packaging requirements set in statute. • Have been removed from the packaging in which they were sold. • Are in packaging that has been opened, or the seal has been broken. • Are in packaging in which the contents have been partially removed. It is not considered a crime if the cannabis products are in the trunk of the vehicle or in another area of the vehicle not normally occupied by the driver and passengers if the vehicle is not equipped with a trunk. A utility compartment or glove compartment is deemed to be within the area occupied by the driver and passengers. Return to top of page Q27. Could cities prohibit the sale of adult -use cannabis entirely? A27. Cities may not prohibit the possession, transportation, or use of cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or hemp -derived consumer products authorized by the new law. Return to top of page Q28. Is our city required to adopt regulations under the new law? A28. Cities are not required to adopt any new regulations under the new law. However, they will be required to register retail sellers and perform compliance checks. Return to top of page Q29. Are prior convictions for cannabis use expunged and what is the city's role in that process? A29. Certain cannabis -related convictions will be expunged by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Upon receipt of a notice of expungement, cities are required to seal all records related to the expungement, including the records of the person's arrest, indictment, trial verdict, and dismissal or discharge of the case. Certain felony convictions will be reviewed by the Cannabis Expungement Board to determine what, if any, action should be taken related to a prior conviction. Cities will be required to provide the Cannabis Expungement Board free access to records held by law enforcement agencies or prosecuting authorities. Return to top of page City regulation Q30. Can the city require sellers to have a city -issued license? A30. A city may not require additional licenses other than the cannabis licenses issued by the OCM. However, the OCM will forward applications to cities for them to certify whether the proposed cannabis business complies with local zoning ordinance and, if applicable whether the proposed business complies with the state fire and building code. The OCM may not issue a license to a cannabis business that does not meet local zoning and land use laws. In addition, upon receipt of an application for a cannabis license, the OCM will contact the city in which the business would be located and provide the city with 30 days in which to provide input on the application. This is the city's opportunity to provide the OCM with any additional information it believes is relevant to the OCM's decision on whether to issue a license, including but not limited to identifying concerns about the proposed location of a cannabis business, or sharing public information about the applicant. Before a cannabis business begins making retails sales, it will be required to register with the city in which it is located. Return to top of page Q31. When is our city required to issue retail registration to a cannabis retail business? A31. A city is required to issue a retail registration to a cannabis microbusiness with a retail operations endorsement, cannabis mezzobusiness with a retail operations endorsement, cannabis retailer, medical cannabis retailer, or lower -potency hemp edible retailer that: • Has a valid license issued by the OCM. • Has paid the registration fee. • Is found to be in compliance with the requirements of the applicable state laws through a preliminary compliance check performed by the city. • Is current on all property taxes and assessments at the location where the retail establishment is located. Return to top of page Q32. Can a retail registration issued by our city be transferred? A32. Retail registration may not be transferred. Return to top of page Q33. Is our city required to conduct compliance checks on businesses with a cannabis retail registration? A33. Cities will be required to conduct compliance checks on retail cannabis businesses with a retail registration by the city. The OCM will develop standardized forms and procedures for these compliance checks. Return to top of page Q34. Can our city charge a fee for a cannabis retail registration? A34. city may impose an initial retail fee of $500 or up to half the amount of the applicable initial license fee charged by the OCM, whichever is less. The city may also charge a renewal retail registration fee of $1,000 or up to half the amount of the applicable renewal license fee charged by the OCM, whichever is less. Return to top of page Q35. Can my city limit the number of cannabis retailer licenses issued in our city? A35. A city that issues cannabis retailer registrations may, by ordinance, limit the number of licensed cannabis retailers, cannabis mezzobusinesses with a retail operations endorsement, and cannabis microbusinesses with a retail operations endorsement to no fewer than one registration for every 12,500 residents. In addition, if a county has one active registration for every 12,500 residents, a city within the county is not obligated to register any additional cannabis businesses. Return to top of page Q36. How does this impact my city's existing license for THC products? A36. It appears that cities may continue to license edible cannabinoid products until the OCM begins issuing licenses. Those businesses that sell edible cannabinoid products to consumers must register with the Minnesota Department of Health by Oct. 1, 2023. However, once the OCM begins issuing lower -potency hemp edible retailer licenses, cities are likely preempted from continuing to issue their own licenses and would begin registering retailers through the city's cannabis retailer registration process. Return to top of page Q37. Which state agency is charged with regulating edible cannabinoid products until the OCM begins licensing cannabis products? A37. The Minnesota Department of Health is now charged with the regulations of edible cannabinoid products until the OCM begins issuing licenses. Learn more on the Minnesota Department of Health website. Return to top of page Q38. What changes have been made to the edible cannabinoid law adopted in 2022? A38. The new law allows for the continued sale of certain edible cannabinoid products with new limitations including: • Manufacturers must have each batch of products tested to certify they comply with the standards adopted by the Minnesota Department of Health. • Manufacturers must disclose information regarding foreign materials applied or added to the products. • Labels must contain a batch number. • Beverages cannot contain more than two servings per container. • Edible cannabinoid products may not contain artificially derived or synthetic cannabinoids. • Edible cannabinoid products, other than beverages, must be displayed behind a checkout counter. • Retailers must verify age of purchaser. Return to top of page Q39. Can edible cannabinoid products be sold for on-site consumption? A39. Until the OCM begins issuing licenses, the on-site consumption of edible cannabinoid products is limited to those businesses with an on -sale liquor license issued under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340A. In addition, the following conditions must be met: • Products must be served in original. • Products may not be sold to an intoxicated customer. • Products must not be permitted to be mixed with alcoholic beverages. • Products removed from packaging must remain on premises. After the OCM is set up, it will issue on-site consumption endorsements for cannabis license holders. Return to top of page Q40. Will I be able to prohibit cannabis events in my city? A40. The new law authorizes temporary cannabis events lasting no more than four days. To be approved for a cannabis event license, applicants must obtain any necessary permits or licenses issued by a local unit of government. Cities may not prohibit cannabis events, but they may set standards which the event organizer must meet. Cities may also permit on-site consumption for events but are not required to. Return to top of page Q41. How does this impact my city's existing THC license program? A41. Local THC licenses may continue until the OCM begins issuing its own licenses, which state agencies anticipate beginning in January of 2025. When the OCM licensing begins, cities will need to follow the retail registration procedures outlined in the law. Return to top of page Q42. How does the new law impact my city's existing THC moratorium? A42. The new law does not affect a current moratorium. If a city adopted a moratorium on low - potency edibles, it remains in place and will expire as noted when it was adopted. Return to top of page Q43. Can the city's zoning regulation restrict where a business can operate? A43. Cities are allowed to adopt reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner of the operations of a cannabis business provided that such restrictions do not prohibit the establishment or operation of cannabis businesses. Cities may prohibit the operations of a cannabis business within 1,000 feet of a school, or 500 feet of a day care, residential treatment facility, or an attraction within a public park that is regularly used by minors, including a playground or athletic field. The OCM will develop model ordinances for reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner of a cannabis business. Return to top of page Q44. Can cities adopt a moratorium prohibiting the sale, manufacturing, or distribution of adult -use cannabis to study the issue? A44. Cities may adopt an interim ordinance if: • It is conducting studies. • Has authorized a study to be conducted. • Has held or has scheduled a hearing for the purpose of considering adoption or amendment of reasonable restriction on the time, place, and manner of the operation of a cannabis business as defined in the new law. Before adopting an interim ordinance, the city must hold a public hearing on the issue. The interim ordinance may be in place until Jan. 1, 2025. The authority for an extended moratorium does not apply to the sale or production of low -potency hemp edible products. Return to top of page Q45: What if my city has complaints about a licensed cannabis business? A45. The OCM will establish an expedited complaint process to receive, review, and respond to complaints made by cities about a cannabis business. The OCM will be required to respond to the complaint within seven days and perform any necessary inspections within 30 days. If certain cannabis businesses are deemed by the city to pose an immediate threat to the health or safety of the public, the OCM must respond within one business day. Return to top of page Q46: Can a city deny a liquor license if they find that the business is selling cannabis or low -potency hemp products without a license? A46. Yes. The new law prohibits a retail license from being issued to a person who has had a license or registration issued under ch. 342 or Minn. Stat. § 151.72, subd. 5b revoked; has been convicted of an offense under Minn. Stat. § 151.72, subd. 7; or has been convicted under any other statute for the illegal sale of marijuana, cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower - potency hemp edibles, hemp -derived consumer products, or edible cannabinoid products and the sale took place on the premises of a business that sells intoxicating liquor or 3.2% malt liquor. Return to top of page Q47. Can a city suspend or revoke a tobacco license if they find that they are selling cannabis or low -potency hemp products without a license? A47. Yes. The new law allows a tobacco license to be suspended or revoked if the licensee has a registration or licensed under ch. 342 or Minn. Stat. § 151.72, subd. 5b revoked; is convicted of an offense under Minn. Stat. § 151.72, subd. 7; or has been convicted under any other statute for the illegal sale of marijuana, cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, hemp -derived consumer products, or edible cannabinoid products and the sale took place on the premises of a business that sells tobacco. A city must provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing before suspension or revocation. Return to top of page City employment and personnel issues Q48. Does the new law allowing adult -use cannabis change anything about how we do drug testing for CDL holders? A48. No, cities with positions requiring an employee to hold a commercial driver's license (CDL) will recall these positions are regulated by federal law, and those regulations are supervised by the Federal Department of Transportation (DOT). Federal law preempts state law related to cannabinoid use; in fact, the DOT states in its DOT Recreational Marijuana Notice that it does not authorize the use of Schedule I drugs, including marijuana, for any reason. As a result, cities should continue to follow their drug -testing procedures related to CDL holders and may enforce prohibitions against any use of cannabinoids for CDL holders, regardless of state law protections. Cities can find more information on existing drug testing policies in the LMC Drug and Alcohol Testing Toolkit, starting on page 22. An updated model Non -DOT Drug, Alcohol and Cannabis Policies will be available once legal consultants have reviewed. Return to top of page Q49. Does the new law change anything related to employees who carry a firearm? A49. No. Public safety employees who carry a firearm cannot lawfully use marijuana under federal law. Federal law prohibits cities from providing firearms or ammunition to an employee it knows or has reason to think is using marijuana. Although there is a legal difference between marijuana products and hemp products, it may not be possible to differentiate the products in a drug test. Officers should be mindful of any substance they ingest because they are ultimately responsible if those products lead to a positive marijuana test. Return to top of page Q50. Besides positions requiring a CDL or carrying a firearm, are there any other positions which are not affected by the new law? A50. Yes. The law excludes the following seven position classes from the law's changes: 1. A safety -sensitive position, as defined in as defined in Minn. Stat. § 181.950, subd. 13. 2. A peace officer position, as defined in Minn. Stat. § 626.84, subd. 1. 3. A firefighter position, as defined in Minn. Stat. § 299N.01, subd. 3. 4. A position requiring face-to-face care, training, education, supervision, counseling, consultation, or medical assistance to: 1. Children. 2. Vulnerable adults, as defined in Minn. Stat. § 626.5572, subd. 21. 3. Patients who receive health care services from a provider for the treatment, examination, or emergency care of a medical, psychiatric, or mental condition. 5. A position funded by a federal grant. 6. Any other position for which state or federal law requires testing of a job applicant or employee for cannabis. 7. A position requiring a commercial driver's license or requiring an employee to operate a motor vehicle for which state or federal law requires drug or alcohol testing of a job applicant or employee. Return to top of pagc Q51. Can we still prohibit employees from being under the influence of cannabis while at work? Does the League have a model policy with updated language? A51. Yes, employers can continue to prohibit employees from being under the influence of cannabis products, while at work. For employers, a key focus will be workplace safety with the consideration that cannabis is more difficult to detect and test than alcohol. Employers may continue to maintain drug-free policies at the workplace and discipline employees who use cannabis during working hours or who report to work impaired. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, employers are required to furnish a workplace free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause serious physical harm. This provision of the Act is typically used in accident cases where toxicology screens are positive. OSHA's new electronic recordkeeping rule, clarified on Oct. 11, 2018, states "If the employer chooses to use drug testing to investigate the incident, the employer should test all employees whose conduct could have contributed to the incident, not just employees who reported injuries," with respect to using drug testing to evaluate the root cause of a workplace incident that harmed or could have harmed employees. Thus, a non -DOT drug and cannabis -city testing policy with protocols following this guidance is important. Under the new law, employers can enact and enforce work policies prohibiting the use, possession, and impairment of cannabis while at work or operating employer vehicles, equipment, and machinery. It is difficult to test for cannabis to determine if an employee is currently under the influence due to the drug's ability to be detectable for weeks after it is used. With the prohibitions on disciplining employees other than those listed in Q3, employers will be in a difficult position to take action against an employee who tests positive for cannabis. A best practice is for cities to train supervisors about the behavioral signs and symptoms of drug and cannabis use as well as how to document observations of potential impairment so should a situation occur in the workplace, supervisors can effectively respond and document what they observed leading to the situation. An updated model Non -DOT Drug, Alcohol and Cannabis Policies will be available once legal consultants have reviewed. Return to top of pagc Q52. If an employee is injured while being under the influence of cannabis at work, are they still entitled to workers' compensation benef its? A52. While each case is very fact -specific, the general rule is that if the injury was intentionally self-inflicted or the intoxication of the employee is the proximate cause of the injury, then the employer is not liable for compensation. The burden of proof of these facts is upon the employer. Return to top of page Q53. Can employees be in possession of edibles or other cannabis products while at work? A53. Cities may enact policies prohibiting employees from bringing cannabis products, including edibles, to work. A best practice is for cities to train supervisors about the behavioral signs and symptoms of drug and cannabis use as well as documenting observations of potential impairment so should a situation occur in the workplace, supervisors can effectively respond and document what they observed leading to the situation. Return to top of page Q54. Do we need to change anything in our collective bargaining agreement (CBA) regarding discipline of employees who use cannabis products? A54. Maybe. If cities have policies within their CBAs that relate to cannabis use and discipline, cities should consult with their city attorney to determine if any changes are needed. CBAs may address cannabis and cannabis testing, but the CBAs must at least meet the minimum employee rights guaranteed by the statute. Ensure your city's drug and cannabis -testing policies have been updated and your supervisors are trained on the behavioral signs and symptoms associated with impairment as well as documenting observations of potential impairment. If the CBA includes language that policy changes need to be negotiated, then there would need to be a meeting with the union if the city's policy changes. Return to top of page Q55. Can employees use cannabis products off-duty? A55. It depends. See Q1, Q2, and Q3 for a list of employees who can be prohibited from using cannabis products both on and off duty due to federal or state regulations. Other employees would be able to use cannabis products while they are off duty, if they are not impaired at work. If there are any questions regarding whether an employee could be prevented from using cannabis products while off-duty, please consult your city attorney before any action is taken. In addition, the law prohibits an employer from taking adverse employment action against an employee who is a patient in the state's medical cannabis program unless a failure to do so would violate federal or state law or regulations, or cause an employer to lose a monetary or incensing -related benefit under federal law or regulations. Return to top of page Q56. How does this impact the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act? A56. It does not. The Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988 (DFWA) requires federal grantees and contractors to implement a drug-free workplace policy and establish a drug-free awareness program as a precondition for receiving a federal grant or a contract. However, the DFWA does not require covered employers to test employees for drugs or terminate them for drug-related violations, so the new Minnesota state law does not impact the DFWA directly. Minnesota law allows employers to prohibit employees from bringing legal cannabis products to work and permits employers to prohibit employees from being under the influence while at work. It would be best practice for cities with drug-free work policies to keep those in effect. If a city wishes to do so, it can update its policy to include lawful cannabis products within its scope. An updated model Non -DOT Drug, Alcohol and Cannabis Policies will be available once legal consultants have reviewed. Return to top of page Q57. Should my city continue to include cannabis as a pre- employment panel screen for my non-DOT/safety-sensitive employees? A57. The new Minnesota law prohibits an employer from refusing to hire an applicant simply because of a positive cannabis drug test. There are exceptions for positions where such testing and denial of job offer is required under applicable federal or state law. Cities will want to refer to the Qa, which provides a list of positions excepted from cannabis testing prohibitions. Practically speaking, if a position is not excepted, cities will need to determine whether they want to continue to test for cannabis in light of the limitation of the testing and confer with their city attorney before taking an action as a result of a positive test. Return to top of page Your LMC Resource Research & Information Service staff members are ready to help you apply their broad knowledge to the issues you're dealing with today. Access online form to submit a question, or call us: (651) 281-1200 or (800) 925-1122 Project Name Deephaven Apartments Deephaven Project Type Residential Address/Location 1255 Edmonson Ave NE Description 3 apartment buildings totalling 165 units a - Date 1/30/2020 Progress Report Completed „ Take 5 Car Wash Commercial 4008 Deegan Court New construction car wash (4,146 sq ft) 9/27/2021 Completed Monticello Lakes Apartments Residential Southeast area of The Pointes at Cedar 2100 unit multi -family apartments 12/13/2021 Under Construction Runnings Expansion Commercial 3007th St Expansion of current facility(13,962 sq ft) 12/13/2021 Completed Twin Pines Apartments Residential South Side of School Blvd. East of Wal-Mart 96 multi -family unit apartment building 2/28/2022 Yet to Break Ground Block 52 Redevelopment Mixed -Use NE Corner of Highway 25 and Broadway St 87 multi -family units with rougly 30,000 sq ft of 1st floor commercial 9/30/2022 Under Construction Featherstone 6th Addition Residential North of 85th St NE and West of Highway 25 21 Single-family lots with commercially guided outlots for future development 8/24/2022 Under Construction Tesla Stations at Cub Foods Commercial 206 7th St W Installation of 8 charging ports in the Cub Foods parking lot 7/12/2022 Completed Taco Bell Remodel Commercial 124 7th St E Remodel of existing building and expansion of 724 sq ft 9/30/2022 Completed Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Residential South of Farmstead Ave and West of Fallon Ave NE 59 Single -Family Lot Development Reapproved 8/28/2023 Grading Commenced Headwaters West Development Residential Along South side of 7th St W between Elm St and Golf Course Rd 302 apartment unit& 60 townhome Senior 55, Development 9/26/2022 Townhomes Under Construction Sunny Days Therapy Commercial Along South side of 7th St E West of Old McDonald's Location Development of an Occupational Child Therapy Facility 8/22/2022 Under Construction Camping World Commercial 3801 Chelsea Rd W Installation of an attached paint booth (1,100 sq ft) 8/22/2022 Under Construction Electro Industries Expansion Industrial 2150 River St Expansion of current facility (4,300 sq ft) 9/26/2022 Yet to Break Ground Wiha Tools USA Industrial Along South Side of 7th St E across from Wright St and Ramsey St New construction light manufacturing (72,540 sq ft) 11/28/2022 Under Construction Kwik Trip #345 Commercial 9440 State Highway 25 Expansion of current facility (520 sq ft) 1/23/2023 Completed Scooter's Coffee Commercial 100 7th St W. New Construction of Drive -Through Coffee Shop 1/23/2023 Completed Cargill Kitchens Solutions Industrial 206 W. 4th St. Replacement of Outdoor Storage Tanks 4/24/2023 Completed Deephaven3 Commercial Southeast corner of Cedar St and Chelsea Rd New Construction of a Clinic/Medical Service Facility(10,000 sq ft) N/A Under Construction