The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023AGENDA REGULAR MEETING – PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, October 3, 2023 – 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center SPECIAL MEETING –JOINT MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Monticello Community Center – North Mississippi 4:30 p.m. Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Submittal for the proposed municipal Public Works facility Commissioners: Chair Paul Konsor, Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Eric Hagen, Melissa Robeck Council Liaison: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items D. Approval of Agenda E. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes—September 5, 2023 F. Citizen Comment 2. Public Hearings A. Consideration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 Square Feet in the R-2, Single & Two -Family Residential District. Applicant: Linn D. Jenson B. Consideration of a Request for Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 Square Feet in the R-1, Single -Family Residential District. Applicant: Chip Bauer Construction, Inc. C. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, including Section 153.067 – Off -Street Parking, related to Parking Area Surfacing Materials; Section 153.068 – Off -Street Loading Spaces, related to Surfacing Materials; Section 153.070 – Building Materials, related to 1-2, Heavy Industrial District Building Materials and Finishing Standards; Section 153.092 — Accessory Use Standards, related to Accessory Use Outdoor Storage Standards. Applicant: Tim Flander/Big Bear Holdings, LLC. D. Consideration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Cross/Joint Parking Easement in the Riverfront Sub -District of the Central Community District (CCD). Applicant: City of Monticello E. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.012 — Definitions, as related to Public Building and Uses and Including Community Event Center. Applicant: City of Monticello Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.060 — Landscaping and Screening, for Standards Relating to Native Landscapes. Applicant: City of Monticello 3. Regular Agenda A. Tabled — Consideration of a Request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a 150 -unit Multi -Family Residential Building in the B-3, Highway Business District and Rezoning from B-3, Highway Business District to Great River PUD District. Applicant: Briggs Companies B. Consideration of Adopting Resolution PC -2023-34, Finding the Proposed Acquisition of Certain Land by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority is Consistent with the City of Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan (Comprehensive Plan). 4. Other Business A. Planning Commission Terms B. Community Development Director's Report S. Adjournment MINUTES REGULAR MEETING – PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September 5, 2023 – 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Eric Hagen, Melissa Robeck Commissioners Absent: Chair Paul Konsor, Teri Lehner Council Liaison Present: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard 1. General Business A. Call to Order Vice Chair Andrew Tapper called the regular meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 6:01 p.m. B. Roll Call Mr. Tapper called the roll. C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items Community Development Director Angela Schumann added an item for discussion related to Mr. Konsor's future role on the Planning Commission given the information on his 2024 schedule conflicts. This item was to be discussed prior to the Community Development Director's report. D. Approval of Agenda ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 5, 2023 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. E. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes—August 1, 2023 ERIC HAGEN MOVED APPROVE THE AUGUST 1, 2023 JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES. MELISSA ROBECK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. • Regular Meeting Minutes – August 1, 2023 ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 1, 2023 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES WITH THE PROPOSED REDLINES AS POSTED IN THE AGENDA. MELISSA ROBECK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. • Special Meeting Minutes – August 15, 2023 ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 15, 2023 SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES WITH THE PROPOSED REDLINES AS POSTED IN THE 2. AGENDA. MELISSA ROBECK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. F. Citizen Comment None Public Hearings A. Consideration of a reauest for Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Great River Second Addition; Consideration of a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a 138 -unit multi -family residential building in the B-3, Highway Business District Applicant: Briggs Companies City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. This project was one that the City Council and Planning Commission had the opportunity to review in a concept meeting earlier in 2023. The applicant proposed a 138 -unit multi -family building in a phased project on the corner of 71" Street West and Elm Street. Following review of the application materials submitted, Staff was comfortable proceeding with approval of the preliminary and final plat of the Great River 2nd Addition, subject to the conditions in exhibit z of the staff report. Staff recommended tabling the development stage PUD and rezoning the parcel from B-3, Highway Business District, to Great River PUD, until the clarifications are made for items listed in exhibit y of the staff report. It was Staff's belief that there was not enough information related to the development itself to proceed with the planned unit development portion of the request. In regard to the preliminary and final plat, the proposed plat would create a 6 -acre lot related to the development proposal, along with a 14 -acre outlot. Mr. Tapper asked how the phases of the development would look. How many units are on the first phase, as well as the second phase. Mr. Grittman noted that was something that would need to be clarified by the applicant. Mr. Tapper asked for clarification on the proposed setbacks. Mr. Grittman stated that some of the setbacks can be met per the R-4 zoning district standards, but as part of the PUD request, the applicant is proposing flexibility towards the front yard setback. Eric Hagen asked if it was typical to have parking surround the on-site stormwater infiltration. Mr. Grittman clarified that it is not out of the ordinary. Mr. Hagen asked if there would be any conflict between the proposed trees planted and the retaining wall that is going to be put in place. Mr. Grittman noted that the design laid out for the retaining wall is fairly common and should not conflict with any tree plantings in the vicinity. Mr. Tapper asked if there was sufficient room for a berm along the south property line adjacent to Interstate 94. Mr. Grittman said that is a component of the development design that will need to be clarified by the applicant. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler asked if there was a determination between whether a trail or sidewalk would be installed as part of the platting of the property. Community Development Director Angela Schumann said that the type of pathway along Elm Street and 7t" Street West will be determined by the engineering department working with the development team. Mr. Tapper opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Tapper closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-25 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE GREAT RIVER 2ND ADDITION, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT Z. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO TABLE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-26 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AS DIRECTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND AS IDENTIFIED IN EXHIBIT Y. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO TABLE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-27 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AS DIRECTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND AS IDENTIFIED IN EXHIBIT Y. SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. 3. Regular Agenda N/A 4. Other Business Added Item Ms. Schumann explained that Planning Commission Chair Paul Konsor has informed Staff and the Commission that he will likely miss the winter meetings in 2024, and asked that the Commission consider his future role on it, and whether they would be interested in naming a new chair or even seek a replacement. Mr. Hagen expressed his interest in tabling action on the item, as one of the Planning Commissioners is not present to provide feedback. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO TABLE DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM, UNTIL ALL COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENT TO PROVIDE NECESSARY FEEDBACK. MELISSA ROBECK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. A. Community Development Director's Report Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. 5. Adjournment ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:04 P.M. Planning Commission Agenda —10/03/2023 2A. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 Square Feet in the R-2, Single & Two -Family Residential District. Applicant: Linn D Jensen Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Stephen Grittman, City Planner 10/03/2023 Commission action): 10/23/2023 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Community & Economic Development Coordinator ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for total Accessory Structure Space exceeding 1,200 square feet in area. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-28 recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit for accessory structures exceeding 1,200 square feet on an R-2, Single and Two -Family Residential lot, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z and based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-28 recommending denial of the proposed Conditional Use Permit for accessory structures exceeding 1,200 square feet, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-28. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 3, Par West PID #: 155-048-003010 Planning Case Number: 2023-34 Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for accessory structures exceeding 1,200 square feet Deadline for Decision: November 6, 2023 (60 -day deadline) January 5, 2024 (120 -day deadline) Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning Designation: R-2, Single and Two -Family Residential 1 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Two -Family Residential and Attached Garage Surrounding Land Uses: North: Single -Family Residential East: Single -Family Residential South: Single -Family Residential West: Public Park Project Description: The existing structure is a two-family unit. The applicant proposes construction of an attached garage of 400 square feet, adding to the existing 880 square feet of attached garage, for a total of 1,280 square feet of garage area on the parcel. A 16' x 12' detached shed is also present on the property, bringing the total proposed accessory structure square footage to 1,472 square feet. The zoning ordinance permits a total of 1,200 square feet of combined attached and detached accessory building area on the parcel, with an additional 300 square feet allowed by Conditional Use Permit, and a maximum overall total of 1,500 square feet. ANALYSIS Zoning. The subject site is zoned R-2 Single and Two -Family Residential District and is currently utilized as a two-family dwelling. Under the current ordinance, a total of 1,200 square feet of accessory structure area in total is permitted, with an additional 300 square feet allowed by Conditional Use Permit, and a maximum overall size of 1,500 square feet. The ordinance does not include a distinction by unit for accessory use square footage. As such, although there are two units on the site, the total square footage allowance applies to the parcel as a whole. Within the R-2 district, garages are an allowed accessory use and structure. The limitation for such structures is that the garage is limited in use to personal residential storage (and parking). The applicant indicates that the new garage would be used for personal hobby use. No commercial use is permitted per Zoning Ordinance requirements. Setbacks. The following table illustrates that the proposed accessory building, to be located on the north side yard of the existing structure, will meet the required setbacks: 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 Curb Cut Access. The proposal indicates an overhead garage door would be installed in the front -facing wall toward Kevin Longley Drive. However, no driveway or other site improvements are shown to provide vehicle access to the new garage. It is noted that the current driveway as constructed consists of approximately 46 feet in width along the roadway access — well in excess of the maximum of standard width of 30 feet, and of 28 feet at the curb. As such, it is expected that the new garage will be accessed only sparingly, and no additional driveway is constructed. Should a driveway be considered at a future point, an amendment to the conditional use permit would be required to evaluate the site and proposal. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Accessory Building CUP Requirements. The zoning ordinance lays out the following criteria for accessory structures: 1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.3(D)(2)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: 1,200 square feet; or b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. Staff Comment: As the proposed garage square footage and the total combined attached and detached accessory buildings on the site is proposed to be greater than 1,200 square feet, a CUP has been applied for. The proposed garage is attached, and therefore no issues are raised with the rear yard coverage. The livable space of the principal building is more than 2,800 square feet, thus the garage square footage is well within the allowances. 2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section 5.3(D)(2)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: Required Proposed Compliant Front Yard 30 feet, and no closer than the Principal Building Continues existing building line of principal building -30.3 feet Yes Side Yard (north) 10 feet —100 feet Yes Side Yard (south) 20 feet (corner lot) NA Yes Rear Yard 30 feet —50 feet Yes Curb Cut Access. The proposal indicates an overhead garage door would be installed in the front -facing wall toward Kevin Longley Drive. However, no driveway or other site improvements are shown to provide vehicle access to the new garage. It is noted that the current driveway as constructed consists of approximately 46 feet in width along the roadway access — well in excess of the maximum of standard width of 30 feet, and of 28 feet at the curb. As such, it is expected that the new garage will be accessed only sparingly, and no additional driveway is constructed. Should a driveway be considered at a future point, an amendment to the conditional use permit would be required to evaluate the site and proposal. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Accessory Building CUP Requirements. The zoning ordinance lays out the following criteria for accessory structures: 1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.3(D)(2)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: 1,200 square feet; or b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. Staff Comment: As the proposed garage square footage and the total combined attached and detached accessory buildings on the site is proposed to be greater than 1,200 square feet, a CUP has been applied for. The proposed garage is attached, and therefore no issues are raised with the rear yard coverage. The livable space of the principal building is more than 2,800 square feet, thus the garage square footage is well within the allowances. 2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section 5.3(D)(2)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 a. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. Staff Comment: The applicant has stated in their narrative that the garage will be used for hobby use of classic automobile repair. As a condition of approval, no commercial business will be allowed in the new garage or existing garage. b. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. Staff Comment: The lot is approximately .6 acres in size. The parcel is easily of sufficient size to accommodate this addition. While a portion of the property is encumbered by a power line easement along the west boundary, the proposed building does not occupy any of that easement. C. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. Staff Comment: The new garage will be 400 square feet, 20 feet by 20 feet as stated in the applicant's narrative and as a part of the building plans. The setbacks and lot size aspects of the project will have no impact on these elements. d. The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. Staff Comment: The existing building is lapped residential siding, and the proposed plans show a similar material. The applicant should verify that the addition will match the existing structure in color and any other aspects. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the CUP with the Conditions listed in Exhibit Z. As discussed in this report, the lot is of sufficient size and width to easily accommodate the proposed building, staying well within the allowable impervious surface requirements and setback requirements listed in the code. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-28 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Existing Site Structure Drawing 4 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 E. Certificate of Survey with Proposed Conditions F. Existing Home Fagade Image G. Garage Design Packet H. Citizen Comment, Dated September 24, 2023 Z. Conditions of Approval 5 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Conditions Use Permit for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 square feet 212/214 Kevin Longley Drive 1. Confirmation of the building material and color to match design and materials on the proposed structure to the principal building. 2. No additional driveway construction will be undertaken without amendment to the Conditional Use Permit, as the existing condition is a legal nonconforming width. 3. In keeping with requirements of the City regulations, the accessory building will be used for personal residential storage and parking only (including hobby car repair); no commercial activity may occur in the building. 4. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-28 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXPANSION OF ATTACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING SPACE IN AN R-2 (SINGLE- AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT LOT 1, BLOCK 3, PAR WEST PID 155-048-003010 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct an attached garage addition to an existing two-family structure in the side yard portion of the subject property for storage of private residential storage and recreational use; and WHEREAS, the proposed total accessory building space would exceed the standard area of 1,200 square feet; and WHEREAS, accessory building space, when exceeding 1,200 square feet, requires a Conditional Use Permit, and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Single and Two -Family Residence (R-2) and, which allows such use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Low Density Residential" for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting the proposed structure and location of the structure on the subject property, along with limited access via the existing driveway only; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 3rd, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed structure will be in compliance with maximum square footage requirements, which require accessory structures and floor space to total no more than 1,500 square feet. 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the attached structure addition is architecturally similar to the principal structure in roofline and fagade appearance, subject to appropriate conditions of approval. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-28 3. The parcel is a lot which will accommodate the accessory space without crowding the subject property or neighboring parcels. 4. The large side yard, and lack of adjoining properties in the immediate vicinity of the addition minimizes the potential for negative impacts. 5. The building will be constructed so as to be consistent with the use and building massing of other two-family structures common in the community and in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for an expanded garage, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: 1. Confirmation of the building material and color to match design and materials on the proposed structure to the principal building. 2. No additional driveway construction will be undertaken without amendment to the Conditional Use Permit, as the existing condition is a legal nonconforming width. 3. In keeping with requirements of the City regulations, the accessory building will be used for personal residential storage and parking only (including hobby car repair); no commercial activity may occur in the building. 4. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this Yd day of October, 2023 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: Paul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 Consideration of CUP for Accessory Structure Created by: City of Monticello PID: 155048003010: 212 Kevin Longley Drive S-30-2023 CUP Request— 212/214 Kevin Longley Drive, Monticello MN 55352 This CUP request if for a garage addition (20'X20'), to the existing home. I intend to heat and insulate the garage to use for my hobby of repairing Classic Cars, for my personal use. I would line to maintain the detached, back yard, shed to store my mower and other lawn maintenance equipment. Dayle Veches and Wayne Kalla, Monticello Building inspector measured the back yard shed and it is 16'X1 2' = 192 Sq. Ft. Thank you, Linn Jensen L� PFA 15�sf YU 4 55 2892sf 37 AGE $$8#f 33• 37 15 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR DAYLE VECHES CONS'TRUCT'ION, INC. 4 \ � f s "N, } I \ \ f I \ II \ V ` � 100 ; � ti • S \ 4 /AV CHAIN LINK FENCE (Typ•) o MZ 4 X31 -�M , PROPOSED-- 6 GARAGE 1 i ox ' 9_r. PAVERS _ �' �_ {:�\ � o ti� i 5 s `-•.• .' ';' �� 0� ° 930.0 0 SIDEWALK �f j eyA/ 9 I SGS \ r 9�l M SIDEWALK f `. LIGHT P01E 30.7 n FBF 93 \ I 31.1 I ! 'sr � �� 931.8 �� .'�• V +931.3 Q� 3.2q- A ,�. 1 0� 1 Cb 4 ` 931.5 h UTILITY RISER 2 g32 � SURVEYORS NOTES: 1. BUILDER AND/OR OWNER SHALL VERIFY THAT SOIL COND177ONS ARE SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION � 2. BUILDER AND/OR OWNER SHALL VERIFY PROPOSED GARAGE FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY MEYER—ROHUN LAND SERVICES OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING EXCAVATION. 3. THIS SURVEY IS PROVIDED ONLY FOR USE BY THE CLIENT NAMED HEREON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED GARAGE SHOWN HEREON. 4. TITLE DOCUMENTA77ON WAS NOT PROVIDED BY THE CUENT. EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN ONLY ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT. EASEMENTS / ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. 5. BENCHMARK: MnDOT MONUMENT #94 2. ELEVATION = 924.42 (NAVO 88) N:\Carlsnn Prnjects\23236 - L1 B3 Par Wesfl2323GAwg LOT 1 BLOCK 3 PAR WEST WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Address: 212 Kevin Longley Drive, Monticello, MN 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET + 963,`' DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVA77ON REVISED 09/26/2023 - CHANGED DIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED GARAGE I hereby certffy that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date O 171202.3 Trace C. McCoy License No. 44531 . 4— Prairie pq material G wilting Type here to search WSB 6 t. S.AW W. 7 WEE . 4— Prairie pq material G wilting Type here to search WSB 6 t. S.AW W. . 4— Prairie pq material G wilting Type here to search WSB 6 t. WEE 1meq unee:Ck2020 lmev merb—ul*e tomprwjhL Un.bedSwt Te— mcy Repp apFub6em Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design ID: 320359121502 Estimate ID: 95423 Estimated Price: $7,760.79 "Today's esrimofed price. Future pricing may go up or down- Tax, labor, and delivery nor Included. How to recall and purchase your design at home: Am� � ti'}1. ❑n Menards.com, enter "Design &Buy" in the search bar OR 2. Select the Garage Designer 3- Recall your design by entering Design ID: 320359121502 4- Follow the on-screen purchasing instructions . Design&Buy GARAGE How to purchase your design at the store: 1, Enter Design ID: 320359121502 at the Design -It Center Kiosk in the Building Materials Department 2- Follow the on-screen purchasing instructions Floor type (concrete, dirt, gravel) is NOT included in estimated price. The floor type is used in the calculation of materials needed. Labor, foundation, steel beams, paint, electrical, heating, plumbing, and delivery are also NOT included in estimated price. This is an a tvmate. It is only for general price information- This is not an offer and there can be no legally binding contract between the parties based on this estimate- The prices stated herein are subject to change depending upon the market conditions. The prices stated on this estimate are not firm for any time period on less specifically written otherwise on chis form. The availability of materials is subject to inventory conditions- MENARDS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS INCURRED SY THE GUEST WHO RELIES ON PRICES SET FORTH HEREIN OR ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY MATERIALS STATED HEREIN. All information on this Form, other than price, has been provided by the guest and Menards is not responsible for any errors in the information on this estimate. including but not limited to quantity, dimension and quality. Please examine this estimate carefully- MENARDS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS.ORAL, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE BEING CONSIDERED BY THE GUEST. BECAUSE OF WIDE VARIATIONS IN CODES, THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE RECIUIREMENTS, THE PL ANS AND/OR DESIGNS PROVIDED ARE NOT ENGINEERED- LOCAL CODE OR ZONING REGULATIONS MAY REQUIRE SUCH STRUCTURES TO BE PROFESSIONALLY ENGINEERED AND CERTIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION For other design systems search "Design & Buy" on Mena►ds.com Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design ID: 320359121502 Estimate ID: 95423 Estimated Price: $7,760.79 '%day's estimated price. Future pricing may go up or down. Tax, labor, and delivery not included. T 2V 1 Design&Buy GARAGE X1 1' 0 2' 1 6110" 2' 1 1'3' � For other design systems search "Design & guy" an Menards.com 7 Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design D 354121502 Deign & Bu� Estimatea ID: : 9 95423 rs7 Estimated Price: $7,760.79 GARAGE 'Today's estimated price- Future pricing may go up or down. Tax, ichor, and delivery not inrtuded- Dimensions Wall Configurations *Some items like wainscot, gutter, gable accents, are not displayed if selected. ENDWALL 6 24"W x 24"H 1LLD -WEN® Vinyl Slider 24"W x 24"H JELD-WEN® Vinyl Slider For other design systems search "Design & Buy" on Menards.com 7-7 SIDEWALL D Commander® 36W x 80H Primed Steel 6 -Panel 24"W x 24"H JELD-WEN® Vinyl Slider Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design ID: 320359121 S02 Estimate ID: 95423 Estimated Price: $7,760.79 'Today's estimated price. Future pricing may go up or dawn. Tax, labor, and delivery not included. SIDEWALL C Ideal Door® 4 -Star 16'x 7' White Select Value Insulated For other design systems search "Design & Buy" on Menards.com Design&Buy- GARAGE 20' ENDWALL A Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design 10: 320359121502 Estimate !D: 95423 Estimated Price: $7.760.79 • Today 's estimated price ruture pricing may go up or down. Tax, labor, and delivery nal included. Materials Building Info Building Location Zip Code: Building Width: Building Length: Building Height: Curb: Concrete Block Rows: Concrete Block Type: Foundation Type: Wall Framing Stud, Roof Framing: Truss Type- Roof Pitch' Eave Overhang: Gable Overhang: Custom Garage Plan: Wall Info Siding Material Types: Vinyl Siding- Vinyl Corner Trim Color: Accent Material Type: Wainscot Material Type; WaH Sheathing: House Wrap: Gable Vents: For other design systems search "Design & Buy" on Menards.com Design&Buy- GARAGE 55362 20' 20' 9' Concrete Block 1 Row 4 x 8 x 16 Standard Thickened Slab 2 x 4 Truss Construction Common 6/12 Pitch 24" 12" No I do not need a custom building plan Vinyl Concordm Double 4, Color: Linen Linen None None 7/16 x 4 x 8 OSB(Oriented Strand Board) Kimberly-Clark BLOC K-ITS9'x75'House Wrap None Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design ID: 320359121502 Estimate ID: 95423 Estimated Price: $7,760.79 "Foday's emrrroted price Future pricing inoy go Wp ordAwn. Tar, fabm. anddelivery not incfud8d.. Raaf info Roof Sheathing: Roofing Material Type: Architectural Roofing: Roof Underlayment: Ice and Water Barrier Fascia Material Type; Fascia: Soffit Material Type: Soffit: Gutter Material Type: Ridge Vent: Roof Vents: Openings Service Door: Overhead Door: Overhead Door Trim Type: Vinyl Trim Color' Windows: Windows: Windows: Open end: For other design systems search "Design & Buy" on Menards.eam Design&Buy- GARAGE 1/2 x 4 x 8 OSB(Oriented Strand Board) Architectural Shingle Owens Cornings Tru Definition* Durations Limited Lifetime Warranty Architectural Shingles (32.8 sq. ft.), Calor: Estate Gray Owens Corning V ProArmor(m Synthetic Roofing Underlayment 42" x 286' (1,000 sq. ft.) Owens Corning WeatherLockb G Granulated Self -Sealing Ice and Water Barrier 3' x 66.7'(200sq_ft) Textured Aluminum Fascia 6" x 12' Aluminum Rustic Fascia, Color_ White Aluminum Soffit 16" x 12' Aluminum Vented Soffit, Color White None None None CommanderO 36W x 80H Primed Steel 6 -Panel Ideal Door 4 -Star 16' x 7' White Select Value Insulated Vinyl White 24"W x 24"H JELD -WE INS Vinyl Slider 24"W x 24"H JELD -WEN N Vinyi Slider 24"W x 24"H JELD -WEN S Vinyi Slider Open End Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design ID: 320359121502 Estimate ID: 95423 Estimated Price: $7,760.79 'Today's esf4mafed price. Fuh ire pacing may go up or down. rax, labor, and deNvery nal inchided Additional Options Ceiling Insulation* Wall Insulation: Ceiling Finish: Wall Finish: Mounting Blocks: Hydronic Radiant Heat: Anchor holt: Framing Fasteners: Sheathing Fasteners: Roofing/Shingle Fasteners: Truss Fastener: Overhead Opening Hardware: For other design systems search "Design & guy" on Menards.com Design&Buy- GARAGE None None None None No No Grip Fasts 1/2 x 10 HDG Anchor Bolt w/ Nut & Washer Grip Fast 3 x .120 28° Wire Bright Smooth Shank Clipped Mead Framing Nail - 2,000 Count Grip Fast 2-3/8 x .113 28` Wire Bright Ring Shank Clipped Head Framing Nail - 2,500 Count Grip Fast IV 1-1/4 Electro -Galvanized Coil Roofing Nails - 7,200 Count FastenMaster S TimberLOKa 5/15 x 6 Hex Drive Black Hex Head Timber Screw - 50 Count No Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design ID: 320359121502 �� Estimate ID: 95423 Estimated Price: $7,760.79 GARAGE 'rodoy's estimated price. Future pricing may go up or down. Tax, labor, and delivery not included. Helpful Hints for Garage Construction • Studs are estimated 16 inches on center with single treated bottom plate and double top plate_ • For 10- and 12 -foot -tall buildings studs should be cut for an approximate 10- or 12 -foot plate height. • If steel is estimated [Pro -Rib or Pro -Snap], the steel lengths should be verified based off the actual framing. Plate height (stud length), truss heel and other Framing should be confirmed. Steel is estimated to the inch, make sure the lengths are accurate based on final overall building design. • Trusses included are estimated at 2 feet on center spacing. The design is based on the zip code provided, design and loading should be verified. • Trusses should not be cut or modified with the exception of trimming the truss tails to the correct overhang_ • The bottom chord is designed to support standard ceiling and insulation materials. • Dropped end trusses are estimated with 18 inch and 24 inch gable overhangs. E •s. tic WIN Menards Building Checklist Planning ■ Get a permit. Check restrictions, building codes or local zoning to make sure your design complies with all requirements. ■ Contact local utilities to ensure construction will not disturb any electrical, cable or plumbing. ■ If necessary, hire a professional to help with planning and construction. • Consider site conditions including soil type, grade, and runoff before finalizing your design. ■ Material estimates provided can be changed to meet your needs. • Menards offers professional delivery of materials. Delivery is extra based on the distance from your local Menards store to your building site. • Practice good safety habits, use PPE including eye protection & dust masks during construction. • Make sure to follow good building practice and all manufacturer's instructions. Use all the hardware and fasteners recommended. For other design systems search "Design & Buy" on Menards.com Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design ID: 320359121502 71=*rTM Estimate ID: 95423 Design & Bu Y Estimated Price: $7,760.79 GARAGE •Today% estimated prove. Future pricing may gn up or dovvrt 'Tax, lohorr, and deh very not included. ioo TM1aSS 1rv5s Iype Oty Ply OTREC4805177 Tl COMMON 9 1 Jap RMansnae I onali F.F .-A %bnUtaCtP-42. EOW C4rf, Mit RNn 1161 S Alp 11 20L'l Pony 6 PD 3 A"b 1'1 2022 47ew I nnu Wee I nr Ml- Auu 29 DU 116 F: Paoa1 IO VI laux I pgeDVIA I ZCZnb4R NNdT o-20VmYrc2"71t 4SD2UADK%gaWN9_ti I USylNbe •�-o-o s -3n 1a -o -a I ta-a-tis_ __ �o-o-a _a2-o-a� o -o-3 a 4-8-�: a 12 7 0-4-'M 4". 3X$4 1.0.0-2! 2D -D-0 10-0- 0 ' 10-0-0 Sea* - I' 1 PI r& Offset% (X. Y)- V'62.9.o-t-8], [5'P2.9.D'1-6[, 16'64-O,E09e1 °AEr Loading (psn Spacing 2.0-0 CBI DEFL ,n iloey IIdefI Ltd PLATES GRIP TCLL 1roafl 420 Pl a to UrlP ID OL 1.15 TC 064 Vert;LL} -0,16 511 7999 240 rNT20 197!144 Snow {ParPgt 418J500 Lumber WL 1.15 BC I 978 VeMCT1 -0.33 B-14 7118 180 TCOL 75 Rep Stress Inor YES WB 0.80 Har=;CTI 0 n$ F. nia nra SCLL 0a Code IRC20 11VTP12914 MatrMS SC01. too 41V&Ignt t55 1b FT - 1594 LLOVISER BRACIINO TOP Lir ORD 2x4 SPF NU.2 TOP CHORV Strirmi-al weed 9ltenthmq dlrecuy applied ew 3-T-2 0t our"M S. SOT 014R D ZC4 SPF No.2 BOT CHtl RC I a Id figalwo o r REBS 2x3 SPF SWd M,Tex rwcnmmengs fnar StablliPers and required fro" bracing Be REACTIONS ( blsme] 2-136$lo-b8_ p"In 0 -Z -6j" 6-136E![l 3-S. {min. p•.7•Sy :19 lea tlu hllq truss eme"on" ip accordance with Staodlzer Niax Hartz 2- 7s TLC 15) ngtal4ation guide. Max Ucrxt 2-78{LC 14), 13-184LC 151 Mau Orae �16031LGB2rf5031LC 221 FORCES Oa) IAMB. Comp (Max Ten A4I forces 2501ib) or le sa ex sept when grown To CHtlni) 2-"15=G-�'65195d.1'ri5--�181r154.3-18=20411159,3.17-149Q 108. 4-17-•13291120. a-18--13'291120.4 18=1 49417 08. S 193 2041 1169, 19120--21131J154. 6.20= ZZ5%M S4 BOT CHORD : 6--9:71rJ51.68---A&1031 WEBS 3 -Ss -8687136, 4 -SITS¢, y$}99&1135 NOTES 11 u n n Alan cid mot live loads nave "e con4 dered for this eestg M. 21 Wend' ASOE 7-15' VuQt I15mph ;& second gustl VacdRHlm ph, TCDL -4 2psT' SCD L-5 0061; n -251t: Cat It• E9p S: Enclosed: MWFRS 4ehve4ope) extener zone and G:. Exterrori 2E)'w 0-a to 1-0-0. Interior i t} 1 0•0to 7-o-0. Edcn or(2R) 7-40 to 13.60. Interior 11113.0-0 to 49.60" ErTenor;7.E1 I2b-"to ZZ, (> 41 We! Ca rntlleVef 1&0 and ng rlf rti ekposed _ and vertical left and right expos eo:" for mm aberg and fore&% &MWFRS ler reaGteins 7.5 sn own; Lumber❑L7L-13 plate griO1 p OL -.60 31 TOLL' A5 CE 7- 16 -P -12.a put iroot LL' Lum DOL -1 15 Plate DqL-I 151_ Pg -cu -t1 pct; Ps -41.6 pot I L u m DOL -1 15 P4 Ate DOL -1 157 IB'1 0: Rough Cat B; Pully Exp.! C&-0.9•, Ls-f.O(Y 47--"1 l0 a1 Roof tlesrgn snow Toad has bear mauced to ace—nr for slope 57 Una alan cod s' Ida tlS na+ne peen C.qn srtleretl Tor ttlis tlesrgn 81 r%toss has peen dealgnedfor greater of min tar#Ilve road of 12 9 p51 or 1 t19 lilt eabx root goad of 41.6 pvf or overhangs non concurrentwlp+ other i,,e goads. 74 Tn1a Stoat ria, been aesFgned 147 a la a psi bottom chard Irv& goad �onca-c�.r err wlln any Other erre Ieaua. BI ^ Tris truss has been dexon&G toa rive Ipad of 29 {tp'Sf on Ime bottom „hard n an area3 whe e a rectangle 105-00 hot by 2 0D. OU wide win pr pttween t•te bottom r -ho d anu any ptner re -7 01 Provide p1 CCha' cml conn Schon ;by atr am' of truss td dCanr,q plate: Cd 091o4e awit harand l ng iN ib Jp ll*at J otter 2 and T8 113 uW IR at j int 6 701 Thos truss I%des'gnea -n acc ardancc w,rh the 2018 International R&adenvaI Code seFih on%R502 11 1 and RWZ 10 2 and referenced stand ami ANSIIf PI 1 LOAD CASE(S) Standard For other design systems search 'Design & buy" on Menards"cam Date: 9/06/2023 - 2:36 PM Design Ip: 320359121502 Design & Buy Estimate Ip: 95423 Estimated Price: $7,760.79 GARAGE 'Today's esrtmored price. future pricing may go up or down. Tax, labor, and delivery not included. Job TrUSS Truss Type Dty Ply OTRF-CO793344 T1E COMMON 2 1 Jo4 Relerence((optional) 65�lresr Man ulaclu tHv. Eau 01aw, WI Run- 8 S7 S Auq 11 M22Pnm' 867OS auv Inc Sun J- 25 r3'M-of P,,pe IQ•vC4ovu e%uy179 hd"03Z2 20KwYaGv'r?vU Ub560B7WC ST 511 EOwi37oJ Um•38gOS .rl�a7 a 0.4-X: 2.0-0 10.0.0 EMI: 10.40 z -0-o 3x1. 5x6. 9oc4• 20.0.0 Scale a 1 42 Pi ate Offsets 1x. Y [2,.Ed ge D -0-4L [10--Edq e, 15-0. 4L L7&630, 0-30] 11 Loading TOLL (roof) Snow (PSIPg) TOOL BCLL SOUL (pst) 35-0 34 7150-0 T 0 00^ 70 U Spacing 2.40 Plate Grip OCL 1 15 Lumber DOL 1 15 Rep Stress Incr YES Code IRC20161TPI 2014 FSI TC SO 11116 Matrx 0.34 011 0'I I VKFL Verr(LL) VeMCT) HwZ CT) In 11001 udea Ud nm - nla 999 his - nla 999 0-00 22 n1a n1a PLATES GRI! MT20 1971144 Weight, 761b FT = 15% LUMBER BRACING TOP CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 TOP CHORD Structural Wood 9ll eath Ing directly so piked or S•D-0 oc purlln s. BOT CHORD tlr4 SPF N0.2 ROT CHORD OTFIERS at4 SPF Stud M+T eir recommends that Sea bl l iters and required cross prat ng pe REACTIONS Air ben rings 20.0-0. installed dun ng trust erecrion, .n accord ante wrth Stab, Iaer (Ib) Max Hone 2- 7L4 (LC 15), 19--74 (LC 15) Instal laton siode. Max Uplift Ail uplift 100 (Ib) or I"S AtJolMS) 2, 14. IR, 13- 14. 15. 17116. 19- 22 Max Grµ A1I ra•cb ons 250 (Ib) or lass. at d NMs) 75 except 2--405 (LG 2), i W405 iLC 2), 12=409 (LC 22), 13.261 ILC 22).14-339 (LC 22), 16=339 (LG 21), 17=2S1 ILC 21), 1S=409(LG 211- 19=708 ILC 2), Z2-455 ILC 2) FORCES (rb) - NTML Com o4MO1t. fen - Allro WS 250(Ib) or less eXcept Wnen 511oµ'1. µF65 578=296185, 378=334180- 7-14= 4-2 95W. 9-12=•334!60 NOTES 11 llnb alanpea mof 'We 'pads haVe been r invaered for this CIESIgn 71 ulnnd• ASCE 7-15; Volt -II 5mpn (3-SeConp qu Sty Vs5GY3'1m pn- TOOL =4 7p 5s.: SOUL -S Opss; n=75fr Gst fF' F><p t3: FNF neJ osed� M1R5(envelppe) @ktenar aG zone no C Corher(3E) -2.0.0 to 1-0.0• ELxtenor{2N)'t-0-0 to 7-o-0, Conler(a R) 7 -"to 13-1}0, Exten or(2N) 13.0 -Oto 19-0-0. Comer; 3E) 19-010 to22-3-D Pone- carni ft iev leand nght exposed -.end vertical left and riy p ht exposed-.(-- C for members and forces & VIOWRS for maction . shown: Lumpl ger DOL- 1.615 ate grip DOt- l 60 31 Truss designed for word loads ,n the plane of me truss On' y. For scuds exposed to vend ( no" a+ to the face). see Standard Industry Gable End Dew lz as appllc able, or consult qualified 17u? wing designer as per AI%SIITFI 't 41 TL'LL' ASCE 7- 16,. Pr -35-0 pcf (roof LL: turn 001= 1. t5 Plate DOL=1.15); Pg=50.0 pill, Ps -34.6 pst {Lwm DO 15 Rate DOL=1.15): Is --1 0: Rough Cat B; Fully Exp Oe=0 9; Cse 1.00; Ct=1 10 5) Rovl design an ow load has been reduced to account for slope 61 ilnaalanped snow Ia os have "en Wnsi d erect for this des+gn 7) This truss has been des!4ned fpr greater of min roof IIve load vs. 12-0 psf or 1. DO tim es rix root Icad of 34.6 pst on overhangs non- cdncu rrerrt wth other Ilve Ioads- 6) All plates are 1.5x 4 MT20 unless othe"I se inwestea 9) Gable requires corroo nuous ottcm chord aeari ng 10) "a 1) &$twos spaced at 2-o-0 oc 'III 7hls truss has been de u9nad for a 11).D pit bot[pm Chard INe load nnneon current with any other I've Ina as. 12) ' Th+s truss has been de&gn ed for a I ve +om ci of 20 Opst on the bottom ch wd n ail areas where a reetan gre 3-0&150 tall by 2-00100 wide will 111 between the bottom chard and any other mem Pers 731Provide mechanical can n ection (by ethers) of truss to bean nq plate capable of wMVrandi mi; 1001b upiA nIoi nth s) Z 10, 18, 17, 16, 14. 13, 12, 2, 70 141 This truss Is 1j" fined in a=Ord once with th@ 20161ntema t ons! Res dentia! God@ septlprv5 R502 17.1 and RW; z-10.2 and referenced standard AN Sift PI I LOAD CASE(8) Standard For other design systems search "Design & Buy" on Menards-cam Date: 9/07/2023 - 8:39 AM Design ID: 320357900502 Estimate ID: 95580 Estimated Price: $8,732.03 •Todoys estimated price. Future pricing moy go up or dawn. %x, tabor, and delivery not inrlvded 2.K.. �---Si-}i For other design systems search "Design & euy" on Menards.com Design&Buy GARAGE Wali Root Openings Additional Cphons Back - Approxkmate Coiling Height is 'J'8 - 3D Vie -%v Estimated Price: $8,269.61 v Foundation/Frost Wall • Select the FoundationlFrost Wall type for your building, the selection will be included on the Custom Garage Plan if selected. • Standard 8x8x16 Concrete Construction Blocks and mortar will be included in the estimate if the concrete block option is selected. • Concrete for floor materials, thickened slab or poured footings is not estimated. Curb Select your curl) Concrete Block V Concrete Block Rows Select your Concrete Block Rows 1 Row Concrete Block Type Select your Concrete Rlock Type 4 x S x 16 Standard Y Foundation Type Select your Foundalion Type Thickened Slab V Wall Framing Stud Select your Wall Framing Stud 2 x 4 Roof Framing Select your Roof Framing Truss Construction Truss Type Select your Truss Type Common Root Pitch Select your Roof Pitch 6112 Pitch Eave Overhang Select your Eave Overhang 24" Gable Overhang Select your Gable Overhang 24" Custom Garage Plan Would you like to apt For a Custom Plan? 0 Yes Cs7 No Y V Y V Y V P Poured Concrete Block Hayden 5tensgard From: Beth beck Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2023 9:14 AM To; Development Services Subject: Conditional Use Permit hearing Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed I am replying to a letter I received about a conditional use permit for Lot 1, Block 3, Par West, 212 Kevin Longly Dr My name is Beth Heck, I live at 106 Marvin Elwood Rd My home is across the park from this location. I have no problem with their proposed structure. Beth Heck Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 2B. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Request for Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 Square Feet in the R-1, Single -Family Residential District. ADDlicant: Chia Bauer Construction. Inc. behalf of John and Tara Thurber. Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Stephen Grittman, City Planner 10/03/2023 Commission action): 10/23/2023 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Community & Economic Development Coordinator ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for total Accessory Structure Space exceeding 1,200 square feet in area. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-29 recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure space exceeding 1,200 square feet on an R-1, Single - Family Residential lot, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z and based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-29 recommending denial of the proposed Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure space exceeding 1,200 square feet, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Lot 8, Block 2, Eastwood Knoll PID #: 155-089-002080 Planning Case Number: 2023-035 Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure area exceeding 1,200 square feet Deadline for Decision: November 6, 2023 (60 -day deadline) January 5, 2024 (120 -day deadline) Land Use Designation: Low -Density Residential Zoning Designation: R-1, Single -Family Residential 1 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 Overlays/Environmental Required Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Single -Family Residential and Attached Garage Surrounding Land Uses: Yes Side Yard (west) North: Single -Family Residential —15 feet East: Single -Family Residential Side Yard (east) South: Single -Family Residential NA West: Single -Family Residential Project Description: Construction of an attached garage expansion of 528 square feet, NA adding to the existing 840 square feet of existing attached garage, for a total of 1,368 square feet of garage area. The zoning ordinance permits a total of 1,200 square feet of combined attached and detached accessory structure area, with an additional 300 square feet allowed by Conditional Use Permit, and a maximum overall size of 1,500 square feet. ANALYSIS Zoning. The subject site is zoned R-1 Single Family Residence District. Within the R-1 District, garages are an allowed accessory use and structure. The limitation for such structures is that the garage is to be limited in use to personal residential storage (and parking). The applicant indicates that the new garage would be used for expanded personal use and storage of residential equipment. No commercial use is permitted per Zoning Ordinance requirements. Setbacks. The following table illustrates that the proposed accessory building, to be located on the west side yard of the existing structure, will meet the required setbacks: Site Layout and Access. The proposed addition extends the existing side -loaded garage toward the side property line, resulting in a setback from that side of approximately 15 feet or more. The existing driveway will continue to provide access to the garage as extended. Because the 2 Required Proposed Compliant Front Yard 30 feet, and no closer than the Principal Building Continues existing building line of principal building -45 feet+ Yes Side Yard (west) 10 feet —15 feet Yes Side Yard (east) 10 feet (corner lot) NA Yes Rear Yard 30 feet NA Yes Site Layout and Access. The proposed addition extends the existing side -loaded garage toward the side property line, resulting in a setback from that side of approximately 15 feet or more. The existing driveway will continue to provide access to the garage as extended. Because the 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 backing maneuver for vehicles exiting the new garage will be complicated by the reduced area, the applicant will need to be aware that the pavement for the driveway may not be extended any closer than 3 feet to the side lot line. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Accessory Building CUP Requirements. In addition to the requirements above, the zoning ordinance also lays out the following criteria for garages and other accessory structures: Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.3(D)(2)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: 1,200 square feet; or b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. Staff Comment: As the proposed garage, at 1,368 square feet, is greater than 1,200 square feet, a CUP has been applied for. The proposed garage is attached, and therefore no issues are raised with the rear yard coverage. The livable space of the principal building at 1,842 square feet is more than the size of the expanded garage area, on the ground floor level alone. 2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section 5.3(D)(2)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. Staff Comment: The applicant has stated in their narrative that the garage will be used for personal residential storage. As a condition of approval, no commercial business will be allowed in the new garage or existing garage. b. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. Staff Comment: The lot is approximately .4 acres in size. The parcel is easily of sufficient size to accommodate this addition. Because the parcel sits on the inward side of a curved street, there is limited rear yard open space, however, the proposed garage addition does not impact that yard. Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 C. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. Staff Comment: The new garage will be a total of 1,368 square feet. The setbacks and lot size aspects of the project will have no impact on architectural or neighborhood character elements. The applicant indicates that the front fagade of the building will be enhanced. d. The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. Staff Comment: The existing building is lapped residential siding and masonry wainscot. The proposed plans show a similar material and pattern. The applicants further indicate that the house will be resided in its entirety, with new windows, so all exterior building materials will match. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the CUP with the Conditions listed in Exhibit Z. As discussed in this report, the lot is of sufficient size and width to easily accommodate the proposed accessory building expansion, staying well within the allowable requirements as listed in the code. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-29 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Certificate of Survey with Existing Conditions E. Certificate of Survey with Proposed Conditions F. Building Elevations and Floor Plans Z. Conditions of Approval 4 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Conditions Use Permit for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 square feet 2471 Eastwood Lane 1. No additional driveway construction will be undertaken any closer than 3 feet from the side property line. 2. In keeping with requirements of the city regulations, the accessory building will be used for personal residential storage and parking only; no commercial activity may occur in the building. 3. All exterior building materials will be consistent with the existing structure. 4. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-29 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXPANSION OF ATTACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING SPACE IN AN R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT LOT 8, BLOCK 2, EASTWOOD KNOLL PID 155-089-002080 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct an addition to an existing attached garage structure in the side yard portion of the subject property for storage of private residential storage and recreational use; and WHEREAS, the proposed total accessory building space would exceed the standard area of 1,200 square feet; and WHEREAS, accessory building space, when exceeding 1,200 square feet, requires a Conditional Use Permit, and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Single -Family Residence (R-1) and, which allows such use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Low Density Residential" for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting the proposed structure and location of the structure on the subject property, along with access via the existing driveway; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 3rd, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed structure will be in compliance with maximum square footage requirements, which require accessory structures to total no more than 1,500 square feet. 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the attached structure addition is architecturally similar to the principal structure in roofline and fagade appearance, subject to appropriate conditions of approval. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-29 3. The parcel is a lot which will accommodate the accessory space without crowding the subject property or neighboring parcels. 4. The large side yard, and large residential properties in the immediate neighborhood minimizes the potential for negative impacts. 5. The building will be constructed so as to be consistent with the use and building massing of other single-family structures common in the community and in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for an expanded garage, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: 1. No additional driveway construction will be undertaken any closer than 3 feet from the side property line. 2. In keeping with requirements of the city regulations, the accessory building will be used for personal residential storage and parking only; no commercial activity may occur in the building. 3. All exterior building materials will be consistent with the existing structure. 4. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. ADOPTED this Yd day of October, 2023 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: Paul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 Consideration of CUP for Accessory Structure Created by: City ofMonticeIIo PID: 155089002080: 2471 Eastwood Lane ❑_. F -I - 55 F1 .1 September 12, 2023 To Whom It May Concern: Subject Property: 2471 Eastwood Lane Monticello, MN 55362 Client: John and Tara Thurber Purpose: CUP application. Notes; We are requesting to add 528 sq ft of garage space as drawn and submitted. The existing garage is 840 sq ft. Total garage space after addition would be 1,368 sq ft. Our home foundation is 1,842 with a total finished living space of 3,966. Sq ft. We are asking the planning commission to approve and recommend the addition to the subject property. We believe the new renovation will blend into the existing home design and enhance its overall appearance. As the home sits in one of the more desirable locations within the city proper, its clientele ask for more amenities and with that, a need to accommodate those clientele's upscale requests. Each design element of the addition has been carefully reviewed to be sure of its overall appearance in the community and representation of the city. We have carefully designed the addition to accommodate all setbacks and egress requests made and will follow those directions forward. Finally, the home will have new siding along with new windows, exterior doors and stonework to further enhance its elevations. Kind Regards, Roman "Chip" Bauer Chip Bauer Construction, Inc. Chip Bauer Construction, Inc. / 9113 Kadler Ave. NE / Monticello, MN 55362 / ph. 763-295-5970 N. 763-271-2707 Certificate of Survey r �a� 9�a.q� zT a e7av-ac e Faah PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 2?63,t,3 ,�JnFoofi:?9 ;, Sly em . 60J-0 Lowest Floor Top of Block Garage Slab ME3 "" G Elevation: 963.3 /,�G -Tod C3(o�w i nE j FO RD Elevation: 971,3 6156 Kalenda Court, #202 Elevation: 971.0 Albertville, Minnesota 55301 Lookout Elevation: qRR 11 /Be nchrnark -� 967.894- 96 .50 -+- N 88°02, 18 E 30, `� 30 + 969.70 968.74156-15 964.23 962.10 ��. 963 35 I 0.32 -To. 60.61 0) r __�-- ;7►- 18 % �,� ®9613.59 12 6 I ,'ry'`' F 963 3 9 I -1'-� 965-78 �0��9 X1.76 _ � 963, .3•rc_ + 969. 969.3 �;t> + 96/ 70' + 64.3317-c '�°` ��° 965.72 969.16 I 9 9.�5 0 ° �� (��. / 961 1 969.24 ._ � r4-- o / 965.UC1 I + 970.25 I 96 �° �oaoJ{0J� ?JU ^967.49 60'^ �0pQ`�969 5 968-10 0 960 65.670 I0(0�116 / 970.66 +_I9 �� + 969.25 � ° 96�-68 � 965.P / o � r ^� T 969.30�6 o 979'20 970.03(_10 I _i- t.l� Q�o�~�/e1' n� yip + a' 966.84 ervices 970.48 I +970.11 �� / 96 7'%l 967.11 / 61 �t 969.9 ` 968.37x` O� 69.8 --- 69.9 968.35 Benchmark- - 969.32 - P. / _....._��. � 969.70" �f 970.50 / 1 INCH = 30 FEET 969.34 � ® --� J 6 - -m�-' f--- NOTE: CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS M AS -BUILT FOR FOUNDATION -- APPROVED a� �•reSS , �L`��l \ �.c��c�cx� DATEC� Lot 8 , Block 2 EASTWOOD KNOLL WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Subject to easements of record, if any. LEGEND • = Iron monument found 0 = Iron monument set and marked with license No. 18420. x 800.0 = Denotes existing elevation 00.0 - Denotes proposed elevation from grade or development plan = Denotes drainage & utility easement = Denotes drainage arrow ® = Denotes offset iron Bearings shown are assumed Boo.ou = Dema��J Asbu%> f Eleva-il BOOK PAGE I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Steven G. Seeger, MN License 'No. 18422 4/24/98 Date/q/Qfl H0 anson AndeAssoc Inc. Enpheers, Surveyors & Landscape Architects 3601 Thurston Avenue, Andra, Mnnesota 55303 612-427-5860 FAX 612-427-0520 103 Pine St, H., Nonticello, M viesota 55362 612-295-5800 FAX 612-295-4489 Job No.: M2683.01 r- n -- / L — / 1 \ / l V V /P %2" 15233 PID: 155-089-002090 N 88002'18" E 156.15 th line of Lot BdBlock 2 BL SBL II I s6L sBFloo I II IN I Certificate of Survey for � 30 V roqadoChip Bauer 3 6 * _ - - Lot 8, Block 2, EASTWOOD KNOLL 15 JJ Cit of Monticello Wri ht Count Minnesota 15233 aLay , g y Property Description (Warran t v Deed — Doc. No. 7860/7): Lot 8, Block 2, EASTWOOD KNOLL, Wright County, Minnesota. 0 0 o / pp rainage &Utility Easement .1 //� \� (Per EASTWOOD KNOLL) I 1 U) I .0- 2 o LR ' I 8 I ° 10 Deck I c l 910 .1 k0 Existing l 13m QHouse #2471 / R, Chip Bauer L8 B2 EASTWOOD KNOLL 2471 Eastwood Ln. Monticello, MN 55362 Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota X p DATE: 9/11/23 DESIGN BY: DRAWN BY: CK CHECKED BY: CEG/CAW DWG FILE: 23-0362COS FILE NO.: 23-0362.00 6918 Shed 1 ^ l0 6 F7 970. / o J I Denotes watervalve n g,8 28.9 a� � �X — � rn Denotes telephone pedestal ❑1v Denotes cable television box 9.90 4 Denotes light pole LS 15233 Denotes Dennis Taylor, LS Existing House I I #2429 Denotes chainlink fence Drainage and Utility Easements are - — — OHE - Denotes overhead electric o — — — — — — Denotes easement I^o• I Denotes existing adjoinersSBL t-JIL — Denotes building setback line 12 103 I I II C I 97416 1 910.5 972 /D: 155-089-002080 `L �- Area: 20,517Y- S. F — X00 \\' (0.477- Ac.) .0 °j Existing ° / ,2 Garage d 0 o GFE=97/.2 -?o d a 0 / 1\0 /l �00, / /I °k 0 �O o 97/.2 IVY / 910.8 970.9 910.1 701 971.3 � 9706 L I' 970.0 / IP / "k OHE OHE - OHE 0 20 15233 IlOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE — —� I /P %2" Project BM SCALE: 1" = 20' 15233 Elev.• 970.00 / I I / I I \ I to /P%2" 15233 �\ I /P %2" \ O 15233 Survey No tes: L This survey was performed without the benefit of a title report. No search for restrictions or easements was made by the surveyor. We reserve the right to update this survey upon receipt of title documentation. 2. No excavation or construction can begin until this plan is approved by the local building inspector. J. The purpose of this survey is for a proposed garage addition. 4. Bearings shown per the plat of EASTWOOD KNOLL. REFERENCE BENCHMARK MNDOT Geodetic Monument "8680 BX" Elevation = 965.20 feet (NA VD 88) PROJECT BENCHMARK Top back of curb at the southerly extension of the West line of the subject property Elevation = 970.00 feet (NAVD 88) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES Total lot Area = 20,517Y- S.F. House Area = 2,7047- S.F. Deck Area = 165Y- S F. Shed Area = 125Y- S.F. Proposed Addition = 52JY- S.F. Drive wav/Wa/k/Pads Area = 2.390'/- S.F. Total Impervious Area = 5,9077- S.F. (28.89') SETBACKS ZONING 30' Fron t R-2 30' Rear l0' Side PROPOSED ADDITION ELEVA TION Garage Floor Elev = 971.2 (Match Existing) LEGEND: Chip Bauer L8 B2 EASTWOOD KNOLL 2471 Eastwood Ln. Monticello, MN 55362 Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota • Denotes found iron monument DATE: 9/11/23 DESIGN BY: DRAWN BY: CK CHECKED BY: CEG/CAW DWG FILE: 23-0362COS FILE NO.: 23-0362.00 ® Denotes set lath DESCRIPTION ■ Denotes catch basin Denotes manhole N Denotes watervalve — Denotes power pole ❑T Denotes telephone pedestal ❑1v Denotes cable television box *t Denotes light pole LS 15233 Denotes Dennis Taylor, LS Denotes bituminous surface Denotes concrete surface d d " d d o Denotes chainlink fence Drainage and Utility Easements are - — — OHE - Denotes overhead electric shown thus: — — — — — — Denotes easement Denotes existing adjoinersSBL t-JIL — Denotes building setback line 12 12'---I-----L--- N.T.S. Being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, and 12 feet in width and adjoining plat boundary and street lines, unless otherwise indicated on plat. VSHEETS Chip Bauer L8 B2 EASTWOOD KNOLL 2471 Eastwood Ln. Monticello, MN 55362 Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC, LAND SURVEYINGCity MIAPPINGGINEERING 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Craig A. Wensmann Date: 9/20/23 Lic. No. 47466 DATE: 9/11/23 DESIGN BY: DRAWN BY: CK CHECKED BY: CEG/CAW DWG FILE: 23-0362COS FILE NO.: 23-0362.00 REV N0. DATE DESCRIPTION Certificate of Survey m m c� m O O K oC v ROOF VENTS AS REQ'D m N -_ PER CODE D15CLAIMER EXISTING 3045 IN PREPARATION OF TH15 PLAN EVERY o 3048 HOUSE ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO AVOID I MISTAKES. DESIGNER CANNOT GUARANTEE L, AGAINST HUMAN ERROR. CONTRACTOR TO 13 I VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS 8 I AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. I THESE DESIGNS, CONCEPTS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF NEW ADDITIONII'-0" EXISTING EXISTING I I NEW I'_6" SERVICE AND A5 SUCH REMAIN THE HOUSE GARAGE I I ADDITION EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF COUNTRY LUMBER ® ® ®®® ® ® ( I AND ARE NOT TO BE COPIED WITHOUT THE MUMU MUMU® ®® m m I I m WRITTEN CONSENT OF COUNTRY LUMBER. ® ®M ® UM® ®U I I ®®® ® MUMU®® I I Z 9'-0" x 6'-0"\-I6-0" x 6-0" MATCH EXIST. {O OVHD. DR, OVHD. DR. SIDING t TRIM LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION I/6 I' -O" 1/6"= 1'-0 z C. U 3 DC� Lu °o < o m z� p UN NEW -E 15TING— V m N m _ ADDITION= GARAGE 10" — �rL �J n I. G.. NEW N ADDITION --- -- E45TING EXISTING GARAGE HOUSE MATCH EXISTING I FRONT ELEVATION 51DING d TRIM n FLOOR DRAIN n FLOOR DRAIN TO DRAIN TO I I TO DRAITO A II DAYLIGHT II N N I I EXISTING FOOTINGS t FOUNDATION I I N H u REMOVE EXISTING TOP CR5. BLK. I II = NEW II ADDITION I CRS. G" CONC. BLK. 4 CR5. 8" CONG. BLK. I UNIXCAVATED I G" x 8" CONC. FTG. I q I v I CRS. G" CONC. Bl -K. I 4 CR5. 8" CONC. BLK. I G" x 8" CONC. FTG. I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -10 )12" 9'-3" 2'-9" 18'-3" '-10 1/2' 3G'-0" BASEMENT PLAN 1/4"= P-0" 2 OF 4 EXISTING HOUSE 7'-G" I I G' -G" I 12'-0" FLOOR PLAN 837 SFT. (EXIST. GARGE) 528 SFT. (NEI/ GARAGE) 1 /4'= I'-0" dS z � o N EX15TING 3 GARAGE EXISTING ROOFTRU55E5 N cV N @ 2'-0" O.C, � M N z I REMOVE EXIST. z d5 3 OVHD. DR. I I --------------- I r REMOVE EXIST. 1 I GVHD. DR. CONTROLJOINT @ CLG. I I I i I I I I REMOVE EXISTING I EXISTING I I I I GARAGE I ROOF I I I STRICT. TRU55— AGAINST EXIST,_— v NEW UDDER LACCESS T2 REMOVE EXISTING b o ADDITION -j B005-0. WALL o °" ROOM -IN -ATTIC_ NEW ROOF TRUSSES ADDITION _ F0x8-0� @ 2'-0" O.C, �_0"x8'0"---------I ¢ v OVHD. DR. I I OVHD. DR. I -v 1 2-11 7/8" LVL ) 1 2-11 7/8" LVL I 7'-G" I I G' -G" I 12'-0" FLOOR PLAN 837 SFT. (EXIST. GARGE) 528 SFT. (NEI/ GARAGE) 1 /4'= I'-0" ENGINEERED ROOF TRU55E5 W/ ENERGY HEEL @ 2'-0" O.C. 1/2" 05B BD. 5HTG. 15$ FELT ICE d WATER SHIELD ASPHALT SHINGLES 24 SUBFASCIA ALUM. 50f FIT $ FASCIA CONT, SOFFIT VENT 1 0" 14'-0" RIGID WIND WASH BARRIER AIR CHUTE 12 I I 8 F.V. I — I I I I Ij I II I II I II I it I II 3/4" T8G OSB I it I it I II I L. REMOVE EXISTING 518° GYP BD. CLG. p p ROOF IN THIS AREA VAPOR BARRIER p R-44 INSUL. p 2xG @ I G" O.C. p R-19 FIBERGL. INSUL p VAPOR BARRIERp -REMOVE EXISTING 7/10 OSB 5HTG. WALL 112' GYP. BD WALLS b 6 MAINT, FREE SIDING p p REMOVE EXISTING 2xG TREATED SILL PLATE p TOP CRS. BLK. 112'0 ANCHOR BOLT 4" CONC. p @ 6'-0° O.C. FLR. SLAB EXISTING SILL SEALER CONC. SLAB GRADE I CRS. G" CONC. BLK. 4 CRS. 8" CONC. BLK. EX15T. FOOTINGS 4 20" x 8' CONC. FTG. FDN. 4 BUILDING SECTION SEE BUILDERS SPECIFICATION FOR BUILDING MATERIALS 3/8"= 1,-0" OF 4 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 2C. Public Hearing - Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage. Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance. including Section 153.067 — Off -Street Parking, related to Parking Area Surfacing Materials; Section 153.068 — Off -Street Loading Spaces, related to Surfacing Materials; Section 153.070 — Building Materials, related to 1-2, Heavy Industrial District Building Materials and Finishing Standards; Section 153.092 — Accessory Use Standards, related to Accessory Use Outdoor Storage Standards. Applicant: Tim Flander/Big Bear Holdings, Inc. Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Stephen Grittman, City Planner 10/03/2023 Commission action): 10/23/2023 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Economic Development Manager ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance relating to building materials, surfacing, and outdoor storage in the 1-2, Heavy Industrial District. 1. Motion to recommend approval of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, including amendments to those Sections as recommended by the Planning Commission, and to direct staff to prepare a Resolution including findings for approval made by the Planning Commission and an ordinance for Council consideration. 2. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-30 recommending denial of the proposed amendments, based on findings in the Resolution and any additional findings made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: NA PID #: NA Planning Case Number: 2023-36 Request(s): Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance revising standards in the I- 2, Heavy Industrial District as related to building materials, 1 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 parking surfacing requirements, outdoor storage surfacing and outdoor storage area. Deadline for Decision: November 6, 2023 (60 -day deadline) January 5, 2024 (120 -day deadline) Project Description: The applicant is seeking a series of amendments to the performance standards requirements in the 1-2, Heavy Industrial District. The proposed amendments would make the following changes to the District requirements: A. Add finished metal exteriors to the list of building materials allowed, including the street -facing fagade of the principal building. The current standard requires masonry finishes, which include stone, brick, or treated metal finishes effecting a stucco look, among other allowances. B. Add Class V gravel and recycled asphalt millings as a suitable finished surface material to the requirements applicable to both loading areas of the site and to the outdoor storage areas of the site. C. Modify the parking surfacing requirements to replace the requirement for paving to read "improved surface". Commission will note that this proposed amendment is not specific to the 1-2 District and would apply to all zoning districts except as otherwise noted. D. Increase the allowable amount of outdoor storage area on 1-2 properties from the current maximum of 100% of the building square footage to 200%. As amendments to the ordinance, if adopted, these standards would apply to all 1-2 zoned areas of the community. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Guidance and C Ordinance Requirements. The proposed amendments would revise a number of the current zoning standards within the 1-2 zoning district. The proposed amendments relate to allowable materials (both building fagades and surfacing requirements) and to site usage (amount of outdoor storage area). The current zoning ordinance language and requirements for industrial districts have evolved over several years as the City's pursuit of industrial development has evolved in both quantity and focus in support of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The current zoning regulations reflect two primary 2040 Plan goals for the City's industrial and economic development efforts. 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 First is the goal of providing an increasing and stable tax base. The Monticello 2040 Plan's Economic Development chapter specifically cites a goal of tax base expansion for the community. This goal is reflected in the interest to maximize investment in both the value and the size of industrial buildings. Larger and more valuable buildings lead directly to a higher tax base and better utilize the community's investment in street and utility infrastructure. The higher tax base also helps ensure a reliable and predictable source of funding for municipal services for all taxpayers. Property tax base stability is of vital interest to the City's taxpayers and overall economic vitality. Second is the goal of utilization of industrial land for the creation and retention of employment. The promotion of employment opportunities, and the continued growth of livable wage employment is also specifically cited in the 2040 Plan. To support the 2040 Value of a vital economy, the Plan supports "Monticello as a strong and growing regional employment center including a variety of economic sectors." The City goals as identified in the 2040 Plan balance the goal of providing a variety of industrial land uses with the goal for those uses to maximize tax base and employment opportunity. Goal 1: Tax Base. The code has been modified over the years to increase the requirements for building materials in support of increasing tax base goals. The standards evolved from permitting fully metal -clad pole (or "post -frame") buildings, to a requirement that the street - facing frontages include enhanced material or architectural features, to the most recent amendment which requires all industrial buildings to be constructed of masonry -like materials or their equivalent, such as the application of a stucco -like finish to metal post -frame buildings. The proposed amendment would revert to the prior standard in which fully metal exteriors were allowed with street -front enhancements. Likewise, the City has adopted limitations on outdoor storage areas. These ordinances are intended to maximize the use of industrial parcels for building, rather than unimproved storage areas. As suggested above, building values are the large majority of parcel valuation. In addition, the extension of utility and street improvements to serve development sites has significant cost. To address the goal of maximizing parcel usage for tax base and employment, the City amended what had previously been a nearly unlimited allowance for outdoor storage in the 1-2 District to create the current standard at an area equal to that of the building coverage. This relationship was chosen to reflect the interest in having the indoor building activity be the clear principal use of Monticello industrial land, whereas outdoor storage is accessory — defined as incidental to the principal use. The City, including its Industrial and Economic Development Committee (IEDC), reaffirmed these code standards as recently as one year ago. Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 The applicant points to other existing industrial sites in the City's industrial areas as examples of sites that it wishes to emulate. While these sites do indeed exhibit a variety of building materials and outdoor storage quantities and surfacing, the majority are legally non -conforming to the current code. Further, the Commission should consider that the applicant proposes to develop on a vacant site, under which the opportunity exists to comply with the current code, rather than a previously developed site in which existing conditions are a consideration. The City faces a limited supply of available industrial properties with street and utility access. The regulations limiting outdoor storage are directly designed to promote the most efficient use of the remaining industrial land supply before significant financial investments are necessary to serve new future industrial areas. With regard to surface materials, the applicant states that the requirement for asphalt paving is unsuitable for the needs of the intended property use, which includes the operation of large tracked equipment and/or loader buckets scraping materials from the ground, resulting in damage to asphalt -paved surfacing. This problem is acknowledged as a limitation of asphalt as a surfacing material. Nonetheless, concrete surfacing can be applied that avoids many of these shortcomings and meets the ordinance requirement. While it is certainly more expensive, it is also more durable. Goal 2: Employment. The companion goal for industrial development is the provision of job opportunities in the City, expanding the supply and diversity of valuable employment for local residents. The City's investments in industrial development, including infrastructure, economic development promotion, financing, and other aspects are all based on an understanding that these investments are yielding increases in employment. While some outdoor storage is seen as a reasonable, but accessory, aspect of certain types of industrial use, the greatest employment generator — and specifically for higher -wage jobs — is expanded buildings and indoor job creators. Thus, the limitation on outdoor storage supports both the tax -base objective and the employment objective. Once again, it is clear that other developed parcels in the City's industrial zones are used and accommodate larger outdoor storage areas, just as the applicant notes. However, those users reflect development under past code regimes, and as the industrial land supply has shrunk, the City's interest in preserving those areas for larger buildings (and the higher employment that comes with them) has resulted in amendments to the zoning ordinance for industrial districts which are consistent with the City's development goals. As a technical notation, circulation areas necessary for drive aisles and fire lanes within a site would not be included in the overall calculation of square footage of the outdoor storge area. 4 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative 2, denial of the proposed amendments. The standards as now written reflect the interests and direction of the 2040 Monticello Vision + Plan, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the codes that were adopted in furtherance of those planning policies. There is no doubt that the code standards establish design standards which are limiting to some types of industrial businesses, even those proposing to locate within existing industrial districts which previously allowed the suggested standards. While the City encourages all manner of industrial enterprises, it balances that interest with the reality that land supply is not unlimited, and that the City has and will expend significant funds in opening and serving those limited remaining parcels. To that end, the 2040 Plan states the following goal and policy statements: Economic Development Goal: Redevelopment and Reinvestment Redevelopment of vacant and underutilized parcels consistent with meeting the City's economic development, land use and community design objectives. Policy 5.4: Employment Generating Land Use Design & Regulations Maintain land development regulations which support economic growth, expansion into other economic sectors, and foster achievement of the City's economic development objectives. Amending the codes as requested has been seen as inconsistent with the City's goals and needs. As such, staff's recommendation is to retain the current standards. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-30 B. Applicant Narrative and Requested Text Amendment Language C. Excerpts, Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan D. Official Monticello Zoning Map E. Concept Site Plans Provided by Applicant 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-30 Motion By: Seconded By: RECOMENDING DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REVISING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS RELATED TO PARKING, SURFANCING AND BUILDING MATERIALS, SPECIFIALLY INCLUDING SECTION 153.067 — OFF-STREET PARKING, RELATED TO PARKING AREA SURFACING MATERIALS; SECTION 153.068 — OFF-STREET LOADING SPACES, RELATED TO SURFACING MATERIALS; SECTION 153.070 — BUILDING MATERIALS, RELATED TO I-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT BUILDING MATERIALS AND FINISHING STANDARDS; SECTION 153.092 — ACCESSORY USE STANDARDS, RELATED TO ACCESSORY USE OUTDOOR STORAGE STANDARDS WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to revise certain sections of the zoning ordinance regulating required surfacing for circulation and outdoor storage in the I-2, Heavy Industrial District; and WHEREAS, the applicant's proposed amendments further include modifications to the building facade materials requirements in the I-2, Heavy Industrial District; and WHEREAS, the applicant's proposed amendments further include modifications to the required surfacing of parking areas, generally applicable in several zoning districts of the City of Monticello; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are inconsistent with the City's economic development objectives identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan document Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan; and WHEREAS, the specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan include those which encourage a focus on the development of stable tax base and long-term employment opportunities in the City's Industrial areas; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would reverse both the language and the objectives of recent amendments meant to accomplish these goals of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 3rd, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of denial: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-30 1. The proposed amendments are inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan). 2. The proposed amendments would tend to negatively impact potential property valuation and employment density on properties subject to the amendments, counter to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The limited supply of industrial land in the community reinforces the City's interest in efficient and dense development of existing industrial areas. 4. The costs of providing infrastructure to both existing and new industrial areas supports the public's interest in efficient and dense development of industrial property. 5. The proposed amendments would result in site improvements that are inconsistent with the code -compliant land uses in the area in which they are located. 6. The impacts of the improvements that result from the amendments would be inconsistent with the interest in providing both valuation and employment - dense industrial development. 7. The planned amendments do not meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council denies the Zoning Ordinance Amendments as proposed: ADOPTED this Yd day of October, 2023 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION U51a ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 September 5th, 2023 Big Bear Holdings Application Amendment to Ordinance: Text Amendment or Variance Application -The text language of the proposed text to be added, amended, or deleted in this ordinance is within each code below, written in Red in Bold Text Amendment / Variance Application Items: 1) Exterior architectural standards. Developer requests the use of finished steel for the primary component of the exterior of the building. Similar to the most recent addition to the industrial park with Monticello Plumbing & Heating, 211 Dundas Rd. An image is below. They used a tan colored - finished steel and have an improved more architectural presence along Dundas which includes a cultured stone base along the bottom of the building with an overhanging roof line above the door that matches the roof to add architectural interest. We request the same requirements acknowledging the need for an enhanced fagade that extends five (5) feet from the principal structure with a 15% minimum in class A products, stone / glass / brick etc. We request this as it is the most suitable to match the surrounding buildings, this type of metal has proven itself for durability, and provides a quality appearance with the addition of the stone, glass, and fagade articulation, that pronounces the front of the building and the primary entrance. EL 2) Off Street Loading Spaces- Drive Aisle - Outdoor Storage (combined). Both the off street loading spaces, drive aisles, and the outdoor storage have an improved surface of asphalt or concrete. We request that an improved medium of class 5 or recycled asphalt be an allowed surface as the asphalt and concrete are not suitable for the principle use of the property. The primary use is a landscape company that will be loading and unloading via skid loaders and front end loaders. Asphalt does not withstand well the loading and unloading of equipment, the tight turning radius of truck and trailers that the narrow site allows, and the loading and unloading of materials while using a machine such as a skid loader or a yard loader. Class 5 and more recently recycled asphalt has been used through out the Monticello industrial park for years and has worked well for its users. It provides a compacted base that functions well that allows the turning and loading to take place both for trucks and trailers as well as machines without damage to any of the surface or to unnecessary wear on the tires or tracks of the machines. The immediate neighbor to the South, Norland Truck has nearly an acre of outdoor storage, drive lanes, and loading/unloading areas that is composed of class 5 which has worked very well over the years. Across the street to the east was Dakota Supply Group, now Hoglund Body and equipment, who has 0.6 acres of gravel that allows for the loading/unloading, drive lanes, and outdoor storage. JME two lots away has 10 acres that is primarily gravel. The medium has worked well in reducing unnecessary repairs to the surface and strain on vehicles & machines. We request that the front parking lot and primary drive aisle to the street be paved with asphalt as that is a straight shot to get behind the primary structure without turning. Then from a fenced and gated line at the rear of the building back be recycled asphalt or class 5. This will fully screen the medium from Fallon Ave and allow the developer to utilize the benefits of this improved medium. Below is an aerial concept with the area to be screened via a fence that would separate the class 5 / recycled asphalt medium from the asphalt and provide full screening from Fallon Ave. CONCEPT DATA .... Fe ce ------------------ -------- - ----- C) i Mastercraft Outdoors Concept Plan A Monticello, MN �• Pmo0 IO: 155 COIG10 3) Outdoor Storage Allowance: The outdoor storage allowance in the 1-2 district is 100% of the principal structure. We are looking at a 7,200 sf building in the front. We request a ratio of 2 to 1. The building will be used for office, warehousing, and equipment service / shop. The majority of the vehicles with trailers will be parked outside. A crew cab short bed truck with a 14 ft dump trailer is 40 ft long. Allowing some space for movement on all side of the truck we prefer 12' wide parking spaces. Master Craft Outdoors runs 5 trucks. The additional space would be used for the outdoor storage of materials. This extra space would allow room for onsite movement without congestion and alleviate any accidents on site cause by loading / unloading or movement from the shop to the yard. Exterior Architectural Standards: (3) In the Heavy Industrial (1-2) districts, the following building material standards shall apply: (a) Exterior building finishes shall not consist of galvanized or unfinished steel, or unfinished aluminum. Exterior finishes may consist of finished steel. ! our 0 5 (b) Any exterior wall adjacent to a public street must have a higher level of aesthetics. This could be accomplished by architectural design features, increased use of stone and/or brick across 15% of the fagade area, combination of glass and architectural or finished metals, or a wall plane articulation across 15% of the fagade area. Such articulation must extend at least five feet from the primary building line of the principal building structure. (c) Exterior building finishes shall consist of materials compatible in grade and quality to the following: 1. Brick; 2. Natural stone; 3. Decorative rock face block or burnished block; 4. Glass; 5. Stucco or substantially similar finish product; 6. Exterior Insulated Finish systems. where said system is manufactured to replicate the look of one of the approved building materials in this section; 7. Cast n place concrete or pre -cast concrete panels; 8. Textured finishes on metal panels to simulate stucco or other similar treatments; 9. Commercial -grade siding made of cement board, composition board, or other durable material, not including vinyl. (F) Institutional requirements. All institutional uses shall adhere to the building materials requirements spelled out for commercial districts in § 153.070(D) above. § 153.068 OFF-STREET LOADING SPACES. (A) Purpose. The regulation of loading spaces in these zoning regulations is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right-of-way and so to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for off-street loading and unloading from motor vehicles in accordance with the utilization of various parcels of land or structures. (B) Location. (1) All required loading berths shall be off-street and located on the same lot as the building or use to be served. (2) The location of required loading births shall be such that circulation occurs within the designated site or property and does not depend upon a public street or alley. (3) All loading berth curb cuts shall be located at a minimum 50 feet from the intersection of two or more street rights-of-way. This distance shall be measured from the property line. (4) No loading berth shall be located closer than 50 feet from a residential district unless within a structure. (5) Loading berths shall not occupy the front yard setbacks. (6) Loading berths located at the front or at the side of buildings on a corner lot shall only be permitted if the following conditions can be met: (a) Loading berths shall not conflict with pedestrian movement. (b) Loading berths shall not obstruct the view of the public right-of-way from off- street parking access. (c) Loading berths shall comply with all other requirements of § 153.067. (d) All screening requirements of § 153.060(1) are met. (7) Each loading berth shall be located with appropriate means of vehicular access to a street or public alley in a manner which will cause the least interference with traffic. (C) Surfacing. All loading berths and accessways shall be improved with not less than six-inch class five base and two-inch bituminous surfacing to control the dust or use a class five or asphalt milling base with an approved dust control program and drainage according to a plan submitted to and subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. (D) Accessory use, parking and storage. Any space allocated as a required loading berth or access drive so as to comply with the terms of these zoning regulations shall not be used for the storage of goods, inoperable vehicles, or snow shall not be included as part of the space requirements to meet the off-street area. (E) Screening. All loading areas shall be screened and landscaped in compliance with § 153.060(1), of this chapter. (F) Size. Unless otherwise specified in these zoning regulations, the first loading berth shall be not less than 55 feet in length, and all loading berths shall be not less than 30 feet in length. All loading berths shall be not less than ten feet in width and 14 feet in height, exclusive of aisle and maneuvering space. (G) Number of loading berths required. The number of required off-street loading berths shall be as follows: (1) Manufacturing, fabrication, processing, warehousing, storing, retail sales, schools and hotels. For such a building 5,000 to 100,000 square feet of floor area, one loading 55 feet in length and one additional berth for each additional 100,000 square feet or fraction thereof, plus one berth 30 feet in length for each 35,000 square feet of floor area or fraction thereof. (2) Auditorium, convention hall, exhibition hall, sports arena or stadium. Ten thousand to 100,000 square feet of floor area, one loading berth; for each additional 100,000 square feet of floor area or fraction thereof, one additional loading berth. § 153.067 OFF-STREET PARKING. (A) Purpose. The regulation of off-street parking spaces in these zoning regulations is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right-of-way and to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for off-street parking of motor vehicles in accordance with the utilization of various parcels of land or structures. (B) Application of off-street parking regulation. The regulations and requirements set forth herein shall apply to all off-street parking facilities in all of the zoning districts of the city. (C) Change in use or occupancy. (1) Change in use or occupancy of land. (a) Any change of use or occupancy of land already dedicated to a parking area, parking spaces, or loading spaces shall not be made, nor shall any sale of land, division, or subdivision of land be made which reduces area necessary for parking, parking stalls, or parking requirements below the minimum prescribed by these zoning regulations. (b) Off-street parking spaces and loading spaces or lot area existing upon the effective date of this chapter as denoted in § 153.004 shall not be reduced in number or size unless said number of size exceeds the requirements set forth herein for a similar new use. (2) Change in use or occupancy of a building. Any change of use of occupancy of any building or buildings, including additions thereto, requiring more parking area shall not be permitted until there is furnished such additional parking spaces as required by these zoning regulations. (3) Site plan drawing necessary. In all zoning districts, all applications for a building permit or prior to a change in use for an existing building or as required for a certificate of occupancy in all zoning districts shall be accompanied by a site plan drawn to scale and dimensioned indicating the location of off-street parking and loading spaces in compliance with the requirements set forth in § 153.067. (D) Prohibited uses related to off-street parking. (1) Required accessory off-street parking spaces in any district shall not be utilized for open storage, sale, or rental of goods; or storage of inoperable vehicles and/or storage of snow. (2) For single-family and two-family dwellings, off-street parking of passenger, small construction, emergency or any other commercial vehicles in the rear yard is prohibited as illustrated in Figure 4-11 and in Table 4-9. (3) Except for temporary uses as permitted by § 153.093 and trailers parking in a designated loading area, no vehicle may be parked and used for storage of items in any district. (E) Standards applicable to all uses. (1) Location of required parking. (a) Required accessory off-street parking shall be on the same lot under the same ownership as the principal use being served except under the provisions of § 153.06-1(G)(3), subject to the public improvement project exception as regulated by § 153.106(D)(1). (b) Except for single, two-family, townhouse dwellings and parcels in the CCD, head -in parking directly off of and adjacent to a public street with each stall having its own direct access to the public street shall be prohibited. (c) Except in the case of single, two-family, and townhouse dwellings, parking areas shall be designed so that circulation between parking bays or aisles occurs within the designated parking lot and does not depend upon a public street or alley. (d) Except in the case of single, two-family, and townhouse dwellings and parcels in the CCD, parking area design which requires backing into the public street is prohibited. (e) All accessory off-street parking facilities required by this chapter shall be located and restricted as follows: 1. For single-family and two-family dwellings, the part of a paved driveway within boulevard portion of the street right-of-way shall only be used for parking in a manner that does not block any public sidewalk or pathway. 2. In the case of single-family dwellings, parking shall be prohibited in any portion of the rear yard. In the case where the only attached or detached garage on a property is located in the rear yard, parking may be allowed in designated driveways leading directly into a garage, or on one open surfaced space located on the side of a driveway away from the principal use as shown in Table 4 and Figure 4-11. Said extra space shall be surfaced as required by Table 4-9 and r-'iqure 4-11. 3. In the case of single-family dwellings, parking in the side yard shall be allowed on a surfaced space as shown in Table 4-9 and Figure 4-11. (f) All parking must occur on a paved improved surface except as may be permitted by this chapter. (27) Outdoor storage. (a) In all zoning districts, all materials and equipment, except as specifically denoted in this chapter, shall be stored within a building or fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties except for the following: 1. Clothes line pole and wire. 2. Recreational equipment and vehicles, subject to off-street parking regulations in § 153.067. 3. Construction and landscaping material currently being used on the premises. 4. Off-street parking of passenger vehicles, emergency vehicles and small commercial vehicles in residential areas, unless otherwise required to be screened according to § 153.067. 5. Propane tanks, fuel oil tanks, and other similar residential heating fuel storage tanks which do not exceed 1,000 gallons in capacity and shall not be located within five feet of any property line. 6. Wood piles in which wood is stored for fuel provided that not more than ten cords shall be stored on any property. A cord shall be four -feet by four -feet by eight - feet. 7. All wood piles shall be five feet or more from the rear and side yard property lines and shall be stored behind the appropriate setback line in front yards. 8. Solar energy systems. 9. Wind energy conversion systems. (b) In the 1-1 and 1-2 districts, the following shall apply: 1. When abutting a zoning district or use other than industrial, the outdoor storage use shall require authorization through a conditional use permit following the provisions of § 153.028(D). 2. The storage area shall be located within the rear yard, except that an outdoor storage area may also include that area between the front building line and the rear yard along the interior lot side. Storage may not be located beyond the side building line on the street side of a corner lot. On a double -fronting lot, outdoor storage may be located in the side yard only. 3. In the 1-1 District, outdoor storage shall be limited to 50% of the gross square footage of the principal building. Storage may be increased up to 100% of the gross square footage of the principal building by conditional use permit. 4. In the 1-2 District, outdoor storage shall be limited to an area not to exceed 200% of the gross square footage of the principal building. 5. In the 1-1 District, outdoor storage areas shall meet the minimum building setback from all side and rear property lines per the requirements of this chapter and when adjacent to zoning districts or uses other than industrial, shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from the adjacent property line. 6. In the 1-2 District, outdoor storage shall be setback ten feet from all side and rear property lines and when adjacent to zoning districts or uses other than industrial, shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from the adjacent property line. 7. The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring uses and from the public right-of-way in compliance with this section. a. In the 1-1 district, screening shall consist of masonry walls or fencing constructed of wood or vinyl and shall provide for 100% opacity. Such fences or walls shall meet all other requirements of § 153.062. b. In the 1-2 District, metal fences may be permitted when the materials have been recycled and reprocessed to resemble new building materials and are designed for use as a fencing material, and when such materials are designed to resemble allowed materials as listed in § (J)(1). c. Additional landscaping of one evergreen tree per six feet of linear fenceline is required to be planted along the exterior of outdoor storage area in conformance with § 153.060. Trees may be staggered along fenceline. d. Fences and walls shall not exceed 15 feet in height as measured from the existing grade to the top of the fence panel. e. Height of storage may not exceed the screening wall or fence, or the height of required landscaping. 8. Outdoor storage shall be allowed only on improved surface of Class 5, Recycled Asphalt, asphalt or concrete. Monticello SION 114 1� i I CHAPTER 5: IC DEVELOPMENT 775 INTRODUCTION The Economic Development Chapter outlines the goal and policies of Monticello to achieve its long term economic development objectives. One of the top priorities is to allow for expansion and diversification of the community's employment and tax base. Over time, Monticello will need to increase tax revenue due to the planned future closure of Xcel MNGP. In addition to objectives related to expanding employment opportunities and tax base growth, the economic development chapter also provides direction for business growth to meet the needs of commerce, industry and the residents well into the future. Strategies include providing a range of "life -cycle" housing options, transportation improvements, and development of a skilled, regional workforce to keep employment strong. The Economic Development chapter is organized into the following sections: • Market Overview • Economic Snapshot • Workforce Development • Workforce Housing • Economic Development Issues and Opportunities • Goals, Policies, and Strategies Ire*The City takes a proactive role in economic development efforts related to business assistance, retention and attraction. The City's economic development toolbox includes the following: Land acquisition and assembly assistance • Site readiness assistance • Construction of public improvements • Brownfield remediation • Financial subsidies including tax increment financing, tax abatement, and a revolving loan program. The level of assistance offered is based on how the project meets the City of Monticello's goals for continued economic development and diversification. These goals are geared toward providing for the replacement of the tax base and employment opportunities as a result of the pending closure of the Xcel Nuclear Generating Plant (Xcel MNGP) but also for the continued creation of a diverse economy for the community and region. MARKET OVERVIEW Located in the northeast section of Wright County, Minnesota, the City of Monticello is located 50 minutes from Minneapolis and 30 minutes from St. Cloud. This regional positioning allows it to draw from the benefits of both areas. The City of Monticello is served by Interstate 94 (1-94) from the east and west, and State Highway 25 from the north and south. This location allows companies currently located in the community easy access to markets across the state and country. Both roadways are rated as ten -ton roads allowing for use as commercial transportation corridors. A second full access interchange with 1-94 was constructed on the east side of the City of Monticello in 2006. Since that time the City has seen an increase in commercial construction including Mills Fleet Farm, Home Depot, Runnings (formerly K -Mart), Super Target, and an Aldi to name a few. The City of Monticello also has access to the Northstar Commuter Rail located 4 miles away at the Big Lake Train Station. The City is also advocating for a future additional interchange with 1-94 to be located in the northwest region of the community. Monticello is also involved with ongoing discussion for a new bridge across the Mississippi River to allow for greater access to the Highway 10 corridor. Monticello is served by two airports. The Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport is located 47 miles away and boasts a runway length of 10,000 feet. That airport provides service to major airlines including American, United, and Delta and provides charter, commercial, freight, and jet services. The St. Cloud Regional Airport is located 23 miles away and provides a runway length of 7,000 feet. The airport provides charter, jet, and general aviation services and provides service to Allegiant and Sun Country Airlines. 116 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Todd. j • . Morrison 1 Pine Mille Lacs Kanabec �r Benton ,I _ Stearns � •' 4 1 Sherburne Isanti Chisago zi a''� •, _ ` ` Anoka a e r- s� Kandiyohi;+r Wright 9 r + + .d' ? 1.+: r Hennepin Ramsey rr r Renville '� �r McLeod Carver v Dakota v Scott * -Sibley Le Sueur'F ti Nicollet`• a ` ti Rice MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN I� EXHIBIT 5.1 City of Monticello Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area St. Cloud Metropolitan Area I� Minnesota Counties Roadways Water Bodies Population Data City of Monticello -13,439 Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area - 3,629190* St. Cloud Metropolitan Area -199,801 `Includes Monticello S—US, Census S,,—(2018). American Community Survey t-yearestimNes Wisconsin O Goodhue North Wabasha r' 117 Growing Population As of the 2010 Census, the City of Monticello's population was 12,759. The 2017 population total was 13,747 which represents a 7.7% population increase from 2010 — 2017. The 2025 population estimate is 14,875 showing growth at a slightly higher pace than the growth experienced during 2010-2017. While this projection is a positive outlook for Monticello, it is difficult to understand what the long term effects will be following the 2020 Covid-19 Pandemic and if the economy will be slow to recover and result in slower growth than what is currently projected for 2025. TABLE 51- COMMUNITY POPULATION COMPARISON Community Monticello 010 12,759 13,747 Percent Growth 010 7.7% 14,875 Projected Percent Growth 8.2% Big Lake 10,060 10,931 8.7% 11,980 9.6% Becker 4,538 4,838 6.6% 5,180 7.1% Albertsville 7,048 7,415 5.2% 7,834 5.7% Otsego 13,571 16,746 23.4% 20,374 21.7% Buffalo 15,471 16,186 4.6% 17,002 5.0% *Projections provided based on forecasting of American Community Serving (ACS) data Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Economic Development Factors In terms of factors influencing growth and development in 2020, the commitment to the tenets of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles are seen as a growing trend nationally. According to a 2020 Urban Land Institute (ULI) study, the level of awareness of ESG is skewed generationally. Millennials drive ESG with 55 percent indicating that they factor ESG policies and performance into their investment decisions — a far greater percentage than for Generation X (25 percent) and Baby Boomers (11 percent). This suggests that the power of ESG to influence capital deployment will be rising over time, qualifying it as an emerging trend. In the same ULI study, a large industrial real estate investment trust indicated that they too have seen that ESG has attracted a more diverse set of investors, that ESG aids in overall recruiting talent, and helps generate community support for proposed industrial projects. Along with a heightened focus on ESG, adoption and utilization of wireless technology will drive commercial and industrial growth as the technology is utilized in factory automation, remote supervision and control of machines and manufacturing process automation. The City of Monticello has made strategic investments in fiber optic service offerings for the business community with the development of the FiberNet system. This fiber network was developed by the City to allow for the provision of high-speed broadband access for businesses. The system is operated by Arvig Communications. TDS Telecom and Charter Communications provide similar broadband service within the community. FiberNet Monticello is an all fiber optic delivery system providing service up to one Gigabit of synchronous dedicated access. Additionally, Special Service Level Agreements (SLA) packages can be arranged for businesses ensuring continuous ultra -high-speed service. Fulfilling the City of Monticello's economic development objectives will require a large land supply dedicated to industrial and employment generating uses. The City has designated approximately 1,800 acres of land for these uses as part of the land use plan contained within this Plan. W4�&.1 Most o Vision: To be a provider of quality, innovative communication services ho o with integrity and accountability. FiberNet Monticello, Source: www.fibernetmanticello.com/about/vision-mission-values/ 118 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP - INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATIONS Diversifying Local Economy Prior to 2020, the City has completed a number of economic development projects including the Dalheimer Beverage and Bondhus Corporation expansions, and the Monticello RV Center. Together those projects have provided additional jobs and tax base for Monticello. A major issue facing the community on the diversification of the local tax base is the suitability of land for future development. The City of Monticello completed an industrial park land absorption study in 2019 that indicated that the community did have a limited supply of industrial property available for development. The City of Monticello has a very diverse employment base even when the nuclear generating station is included in the overall employment numbers. This diversity will help the community as it works to replace the positions lost with the decommissioning of the Xcel MNGP. Monticello's top industries by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes includes Retail Trade, Health Care & Social Assistance, Professional, Scientific, & Tech Services, Real Estate Rental & Leasing, Construction, and Manufacturing. Together those industries account for over 50% of the City's employment base. CentraCare - Monticello, Source: City of Monticello TABLE 5.2: TOP MONTICELLO EMPLOYERS Employer.. ..Employee Electric Power Generation 700 Xcel Energy Nuclear 221113 Power (Xcel MNGP) Monticello ISD #888 611110 Public School System 576 CentraCare Health 62210 General Medical -Surgical 500 System Hospital Cargill Kitchen 42440 Egg based food products 433 Solutions Walmart Store 452311 Supercenter Discount Retail 325 Store Ultra Machine 339112 Precision Manufacturing 200 Corporation Home Depot 452311 Supercenter/Discount Retail 160 Store Target Store 452311 Supercenter/Discount Home 150 Store WSI/Polaris 336310 Precision Machining, Engine 130 Pa its Cub Foods Grocery 445110 Supermarket Grocery Store 100 Bondhus 332216 Tools/Wrenches/Screwdrivers 103 Dahlheimer 424810 Beer Distributor 96 Beverage Genereux-Westland 337212 Cabinets/Cabinet Parts 67 Distribution Suburban 333914 Lubrication/Filter System 65 Manufacturing Components Production Stamping 336370 Metal Stamping Fittings/ 62 Gaskets/Parts Twin Cities Die Cast 331523 Aluminum/Magnesium Die 62 Casting Camping World 441210 Camping Vehicle Sales 55 Aroplax Plastic Injection Molded Parts 52 Karlsburger Foods 311421 Soup, Sauce and Base Foods 49 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 94 0 LARGEST EMPLOYERS LOCATION MAP Provided in Table 6.3 below are the top 15 taxpayers within the City of Monticello from 2016 to 2018 as well as their tax capacity impact on the City. The tax capacity shown is based on its taxable market value multiplied by its class rate. TABLE 5.3:2016 - 2018 TOP MONTICELLO TAX PAYERS Business Name Total Tax Capacity Business Name Total Tax Capacity 2017 Business Name Total Tax Capacity 2016 2018 Northern States Power Co. (Xcel Energy) $16,294,278 Northern States Power Co. (Xcel Energy) $16,970,092 Northern States Power Co. (Xcel Energy) $15,913,229 Iret Properties $295,132 Iret Properties $295,132 Wal-Mart $206,950 Mills Fleet Farm $251,524 Wal-Mart $202,950 Target Corporation $200,250 Wal-Mart $196,510 Target Corporation $199,250 Monti -Big Lake Community Hospital $146,880 Target Corporation $195,510 Monti -Big Lake Community Hospital $145,440 Home Depot $131,450 Monti -Big Lake Community Hospital $145,440 Home Depot $129,280 Spirit Master Funding $102,521 Home Depot $127,190 Mills Fleet Farm I $128,368 AX TC Retail $101,626 Clear Creek Land Company $119,976 Minnegasco Inc $102,521 Minnegasco Inc. $78,294 Monti -Big Lake Community Hospital $109,980 Spirit Master Funding $101,626 Tapper's Holdings LLC $77,636 Spirit Master Funding $102,515 AX TC Retail $81,858 WSI Industries $77,252 AX TC Retail $101,634 Centerpoint Energy $77,252 Iret Properties $75,782 Centerpoint Energy $95,184 Tapper's Holdings LLC. $77,636 RCE Property LLC $73,250 Tapper's Holdings LLC. $77,638 Anderson Companies LLC. $73,250 BBF Properties $71,558 WSI Industries $77,252 BBF Properties I $70,318 UMC Real Estate $66,250 SCF RC Funding IV LLC. $73,250 Bluffs in Monticello LLC. $69,224 I BNSF Railway Company $63,676 Monticello's Total Tax Capacity $29,528,145 Monticello's Total Tax Capacity $27,583,160 Monticello's Total Tax Capacity $25,891,898 Northern States Power Co. Percentage of Tax Capacity 55.18% Northern States Power Co. Percentage of Tax Capacity 61.52% Northern States Power Co. Percentage of Tax Capacity 61.46% 122 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Pending Closure of Xcel Nuclear Generating Plant (Xcel MNGP) Monticello has taken a proactive approach to assessing and diversifying its tax base. Monticello's largest taxpayer, Xcel Energy, had previously planned for its nuclear power generation plant in Monticello to be decommissioned in 2030. However, it recently submitted a new long-term resource plan to the Minnesota utility regulators stating its intention to extend the license ten more years to 2040. Recognizing that the future is uncertain with respect to the Xcel generating facility, the City of Monticello is actively working to diversify its tax base and increase employment with additional commercial and industrial businesses. This is important as not only is Xcel Energy the largest employer within the community, it is also the largest tax payer in Monticello. Looking long-term, Monticello will have to seek other sources of revenue such as increased property taxes as the pending closure of Xcel nears. The City of Monticello collects approximately 30% of the total tax capacity generated within its municipal boundary. The remaining two thirds of the taxes are distributed to Wright County and the School District with the remaining ten percent being distributed to special taxing districts. The total net tax capacity for 2018 was $29,528,145. The City of Monticello collected approximately 30% of that amount resulting in $8,858,443 being collected by the City. In the same year Xcel had a tax capacity of $4,888,283 which amounted to 55% of the City's total annual tax base in 2018. The amount Xcel pays has been decreasing since 2016 due to changes in the formula for the determining of property valuations for generating stations. The percentage has also been decreasing due in part to the overall increase in tax capacity in Monticello as a result of recent development projects. This scenario is expressed in Table 6.4. In total Northern States Power has approximately 450 acres currently under site control with frontages on Interstate 94 as well as the Mississippi River. The land use for Xcel MNGP is reserved exclusively for their facility since they have now requested licensing through the year 2040. Monticello Mall, Source: Monticello Chamber of Commerce Brochure (1980s) Xcel Energy Facility, Source: Monticello Chamber of Commerce Brochure (1980s) MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 123 ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT 2020 The City of Monticello has been very successful in creating a strong and diversified economy by retaining jobs and employers. This success has allowed Monticello to begin the process of supplementing tax revenue to reduce the negative impacts from the eventual closure of the Xcel MNGP. The full build -out of the City owned Otter Creek Industrial Park will help this effort. The City of Monticello must also consider the future locations for new industrial uses and the timeline for those sites to be available for development. In 2020, the City of Monticello completed a feasibility study for the development of a number of areas focusing on the potential costs of the new development. One of the issues facing Monticello will be the speed at which sites may be available for development. Many companies have an expectation that sites are or can be readily available to allow for a fast turn -around of a project. If a community does not have sites available, they may lose the opportunity for new development. In addition to the attraction and retention of businesses, Monticello has also identified the importance of redevelopment to improve the image of the community. Key sites for redevelopment in the downtown are identified in the Downtown Small Area Plan. The plan notes that redevelopment may occur in quarter block increments, with revitalization also playing a role in the success of downtown. 1,412 6,332 6,359 2017 MONTICELLO INFLOW/OUTFLOW JOB COUNTS M Live outside the City of Monticello but Employed Inside 2017 U.S. Census and American Community Survey M Employed and Live in the City of Monticello Live in the City of Monticello but Employed Outside TABLE 5.5: CITY OF MONTICELLO OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY VALUE Housing022025* Percent <$50,000 177 4.8% 126 3.1% T $50,000 - $99,999 98 2.6% 48 1.200 $100,000 - $149,999 249 6.7% 129 3.2% $150,000 - $199,999 988 26.6% 744 18.3% $200,000- $249,999 989 26.6% 1,120 27.6% $250,000- $299,999 708 19.0% 1,017 25.1% $300,000- $399,999 411 11.0% 687 16.9% $400,000- $499,999 76 2.0% 141 3.5% $500,000- $749,999 20 0.5% 39 1.0% $750,000- 0 °' 0.0,0 0 0.0°% $999,999 $1,000,000 - 0 0.0% 0 0.001. $1,499,999 $1,500,000 - $1,999,999 4 0.1010 6 0.10", $2,000,000+ 0 0.0% 0 0.0% *Projections provided by ESRI forecasting of American Community Serving (ACS) data 124 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TABLE 5.6: WRIGHT COUNTY OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY VALUE Housing020 Percent 2025* Percent <$50,000 1,524 3.7% 1,096 2.5% $50,000 - $99,999 928 2.3% 523 1.290 $100,000 - $149,999 2,492 6.1% 1,361 3.1% $150,000 - $199,999 6,934 17.0% 4,951 11.290 $200,000- $249,999 7,960 19.5% 7,905 17.9% $250,000- $299,999 7,646 18.7% 9,295 21.1% $300,000- $399,999 7,473 18.3% 10,244 23.2% $400,000- $499,999 2,915 7.1% 4,309 9.8% $500,000- $749,999 2,073 5.1% 3,098 7.0% $750,000- $999,999 583 1.4% 870 2.0% $1,000,000 - $1,499,999 191 0.50/. 243 0.6% $1,500,000 - 34 0.111. 46 0.1% $1,999,999 $2,000,000+ 138 0.3% 184 0.4% 'Projections provided by ESRI forecasting of American Community Serving (ACS) data The City will need to evaluate opportunities for reinvestment and revitalization of the community in all areas. While this plan focuses growth in the core of the city, the plan also stresses the need to support reinvestment and improvements to keep existing residential, commercial and industrial areas strong. As buildings or neighborhoods throughout Monticello age, a mix of public and private investment will be needed to maintain the character and appearance of the city. The City of Monticello will strongly encourage reinvestment in the oldest residential neighborhoods surrounding downtown and along the river. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT The City of Monticello's strategy for workforce development is to enhance the skills of people already in working in Monticello, as well as provide tangible and relevant skills to those looking for employment. Continuing education opportunities and partnerships are both needed to implement this strategy and help Monticello residents, and potential future residents, find a range of education and training opportunities to meet their professional goals. An inadequate workforce development and training program will lead to people looking for jobs elsewhere. The is evident by the number of people living in Monticello but leaving the City to work. Workforce development also affects the Monticello's ability to retain and attract new employees. This can be accomplished by ensuring a quality educational system, lifecycle housing opportunities, strong relationships with existing businesses to assist in the promotion of employment opportunities, and the continued growth of livable wage employment opportunities. Currently, there are 6,332 employees that work in the City but live elsewhere. In addition, an almost equal amount of residents, 6,359, leave the City on a daily basis to work somewhere else. The City has the potential to capture dollars from people outside of Monticello who work in the City. This will help drive the local economy but the City must also understand the need to retain these employees and attract them to Monticello by offering a wide range of housing options. Prior to planning for future housing options it's important to have a clear understanding of the existing housing stock in the community. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 125 The flow of employees to jobs outside of the City, or into the City while living in a different area occurs for several reasons. Attracting employees can be the result of livable wage positions that may not be available in the areas that they live. It can also be a result of the employee being attached to their existing community because of the school system, family, or other personal reasons. Another issue that can affect the attraction of employees to a community is the availability of housing to meet their needs. As families move through their career paths and family status, their housing needs change and will rely on communities to provide that lifecycle housing. WORKFORCE HOUSING As a city actively developing, Monticello is taking a careful yet proactive approach to planning land use and density to ensure adequate amounts of land are guided to provide opportunities for a full range of "life cycle" housing options. The City is especially looking for opportunities to develop a range of life-cyle and "step- up" housing options as a way to attract new industrial development and jobs that offers higher paying wages. Existing Housing Value Assessment The measure of affordability of a housing unit compares housing cost to gross household income. The general standard is that housing is affordable if housing expenses equal 30% or less of a person's gross household income. Tables 6.5 and 6.6 demonstrates the value of the City of Monticello's housing stock in comparison to the entirety of Wright County. Notably, 46% of the City of Monticello's housing stock is valued between $150,000 - $250,000 compared to 29% of Wright County housing stock of the same value (refer to Table 6.5 and 6.6). This aligns with the data that suggests housing prices are increasing in Monticello compared to the County. It is important that a range of affordable housing stock in the community is maintained while also providing housing products in the higher values as well. Affordable Workforce Housing The City completed (2020) a comprehensive housing study that assesses the housing needs for the community. It is imperative that any successful economic development policies and strategies allow for the development of life -cycle housing to allow for the continued growth of the community. The policies and strategies from the housing study have been incorporated into this plan. A generally accepted standard is that in order to develop new affordable housing, the development needs to be a minimum of eight units per acre. Based on the City's future land use plan 986 acres would allow for residential development at eight units or more per acre. While the City has created a land use plan that permits areas at greater density, barriers to development of affordable housing still exist. Some of these barriers are beyond the City's control including, but not limited to: • Steady increases in land prices and State and County tax structures • Increase in construction costs. When combined with land prices, it becomes more difficult to provide affordable units through new construction. • Property constraints from wetlands, woodlands, soils, poor access or others. • Availability of regional public transit options within the City. The goals, policies, and strategies section includes specific efforts to pursue as it relates to offering a range of affordable housing options. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES In the next 20 years the City will face a variety of issues as well as opportunities related to economic development. Many of these issues are larger in scale and will require regional and state partners to address them, especially as related to transportation and infrastructure. Tax Base Diversification One of the primary issues facing the City will be sourcing new tax revenue and normalizing the City's financial system. The City's tax base relies heavily on the Xcel MNGP which is a finite revenue stream and will eventually be gone. Communities with diverse tax bases are resilient to shifts and fluctuations in the economy more so than communities that have a single large taxpayer or a majority of businesses in a single industry or sector. When the generating station is excluded from the equation, the City's largest single taxpayer makes up only 2.3% of the total tax capacity. This allows the city to have significant stability as it replaces the Xcel MNGP taxes. However, this diversity requires the community to look to multiple projects to help fill the pending gap but also allows for the development of industry clusters to provide both tax base and employment opportunities. 126 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Workforce Development The success of workforce development requires that the City develop a plan for development and training of the required work force. Creating and maintaining strong relationships with businesses is critical to identify needs and assist with the coordination between the training institutions to teach the required skills. This will also help identify potential funding sources further strengthening those relationships. The attraction of new livable wage employment opportunities is important to allow for the continued success of the local economy as well as attraction of new businesses and employment opportunities. The retention of existing businesses and employees in the community will maintain a workforce and help attract the needed workers to fill these positions. Workforce Housing The City has a limited number of step-up type housing and senior housing units. The community does have a significant number of "entry" level housing which limits the community's ability to retain residents that seek housing units with a greater level of amenities. These residents, while working in Monticello, live in the surrounding communities resulting in the City losing the opportunity to benefit from the retail spending and additional tax base of higher value homes. In addition to the shortage of move up housing, the City also has a limited number of senior housing opportunities. This limited supply results in older residents staying in their homes and those homes not being available for new residents. If the older residents move to another community for housing, Monticello loses their retail activity which is generally higher than younger residents further reducing growth and economic stability. The city also has a limited number of multi -family units to allow for the workforce required for the jobs that are being created through the expansion and attraction of businesses. As people are changing or beginning their careers, finding affordable housing is a pressing need and can be a primary factor in their success or failure. Regardless of the success of creating employment opportunities, if workers cannot live in the community and become part of the socio-economic fabric of the community, then the success will be short lived. Transportation Improvements Monticello will continue to plan for the completion of its comprehensive roadway and pathway system. Transportation costs are a major factor for businesses evaluating new locations. A well-maintained transportation network connected to the larger regional network will be critical for attracting new business and diversifying to warehousing and distribution sectors. The continued planning and development of the transportation system improvements including a potential interchange with major transportation arteries will also allow for the continued growth of Monticello. The City will also need to commit resources to the continued maintenance of the existing infrastructure to support the local economy. Bridge Traffic Presently, State Highway 25 is the only river crossing in the City and greater region. A new bridge crossing would help alleviate traffic congestion on Highway 25 and also provide options for emergency access. However, Highway 25 results in motorists traveling through the City's downtown that serve as possible customers for local businesses. Transportation improvements could alleviate some congestion and also improve east/west walkability through downtown Monticello. A new bridge in the region is a long term improvement and requires considerable investment and additional study, but would also will reduce the amount of traffic flowing through downtown, especially on the weekends. Monticello needs to continue to be an active member in the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning group as they work towards siting and eventually development of a new river crossing to maximize the benefit to the City. COVID-19 Pandemic Response The City proactively responded to the business community to support business operations during the global COVID-19 pandemic. The City approved temporary loan forbearance requests and an emergency grant program to assist those businesses with outstanding loans that have been negatively affected by the pandemic. This loan forbearance helped to ensure employers continue to retain employees. The long-term effects of the pandemic will not be known until after adoption of this plan. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 127 AREAS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOCUS AND INVESTMENT The following areas represent opportunities in the city to help drive economic growth and further support the community's goals related to economic development. 1. Industrial Land: This comprehensive plan designates approximately 1,600 acres of land for industrial uses, including land within the Northwest area, south along Highway 25, and in the Otter Creek Business Park. In 2020, the City completed an industrial feasibility study evaluating these areas in greater detail for their industrial potential. In alignment with the goals and policies of this chapter, the City should actively pursue the development of additional industrial land through business attraction. 2. Oakwood Industrial Park: In alignment with the goals for advancement of living wage employment and intensification of tax base, there is opportunity to convert some parcels within Oakwood Industrial Park to light manufacturing from their current heavy industrial uses and/or convert large areas of unused land or outdoor storage. The City should explore opportunities to use State redevelopment grants and rehabilitation programs for these sites. 3. 1-94 Interchange and Highway 25 Interchange Area: The land uses and parcel configurations in these key intersection areas may not be optimal. The City should be prepared to work with property owners and developers as market opportunities arise to better align these visible areas for future reinvestment and/or redevelopment. 4. Downtown: The Downtown area, identified as Downtown Mixed Use in this plan, represents a focused opportunity area. This includes specific attention on the Walnut Corridor, Block 52, Block 34, and the Northeast corner of Cedar Street and Broadway. Opportunities for improvement include land uses consistent with the Downtown Small Area Plan as well as streetscape, landscape and circulation improvements. 5. Mixed Neighborhood Areas: The City should work to maintain the oldest residential neighborhoods in areas adjacent to the Downtown. Efforts should be made to maintain housing choices, redevelopment where appropriate, the introduction of neighborhood centers and the possible introduction of local specialty retail where appropriate. 6. Highway 25 Corridor South: There are a number of areas and sites that could present reinvestment and/or redevelopment opportunity along Highway 25 south between 1-94 and School Boulevard. The Economic Development Authority (EDA) should continue to work with property owners on their desire to sell, redevelop and reinvest in their sites for commercial development. Downtown Monticello Monticello Crossing Apartments Carlisle Village Townhomes, Source: City of Monticello 128 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY FOCUS AREAS �--7l12'o� All AOrL A ,'r: .1176 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS Listed below are the economic development goals which were informed by the Community Vision. For the complete set of policies and strategies for the goals refer to the Implementation Chapter. GOAL 1: BUSINESS ATTRACTION AND RETENTION A successful business attraction and retention program that attracts new businesses and retains existing businesses. NAGOAL 2: TAX BASE EXPANSION stable and expanding tax base that diversifies the city's economy and creates a sustainable employment to offset the eventual closure kGOA: Xcel Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. L DOWNTOWN VITALITY rant and thriving Downtown that contributes to the City's economic development and housing objectives. GOAL 4: REDEVELOPMENT AND REINVESTMENT rcels consistent with meeting the City's economic development, land use and community design objectives. :GAL 5: LIFE -CYCLE HOUSING ce o w� e a commum wi a wide variety of housing options that includes workforce, starter, step up, and senior housing to allow for new and existing residents to remain and age in the community. GOAL 6: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT A workforce development and training program that provides the skills and knowledge needed for a wide range of jobs and opportunities. GOAL 7: PROMOTION AND PARTNERSHIPS Collaborative Partnerships and the Promotion of Monticello Economic Development Projects, Programs and Activities. GOAL 8: OPPORTUNITY FOCUS AREAS Reinvestment, redevelopment and overall improvement of the opportunity focus areas within the City. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 131 IMPLEMENTATION CHART: LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION SHORT- I LONG- ONGOING THEME TERM TERM • Policy 1.5. Sustainable Land Use Strategy 1.5.5 - Consider incentives such as Planning and Development fee reductions or low-interest loan programs for incorporation of green energy or sustainability O practices in commercial and industrial site and building design. • Policy 1.6: Design Improvements Strategy1.6.1-Target existing residential and Amenities neighborhoods, commercial areas or corridors ((( and other mature areas of the City with quality ))) Encourage and Implement of life improvements such as sidewalk and O streetscape, landscape and urban trail connections, urban design elements and design improvements and amenities signage to make these areas more attractive in previously developed areas within and livable. the City as a means to support reinvestment and maintain Strategy -Consider design enhancements with publicc improvement projects undertaken O property values. within the existing city boundary. • • POIICy 1.7: Zoning to Strategy 1.7.1- Use Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Manage Growth and building height standards in commercial, Use zoning regulations to focus industrial, and mixed-use areas to control the the City's growth, improve the intensity of development. Use residential density O downtown, create complete standards (units/acre) in residential and mixed - use areas to control the intensity and encourage neighborhoods, achieve specific types of residential development. compatibility between adjacent uses, address land use conflicts, Strategy 1.7.2- Review and amend the promote employment and economic vitality, and protect the health commercial, industrial and residential development regulations and standards in the O and safety of the city's residents, zoning code as necessary to reflect the intent 1J1 and implement the goals and policies of the workers and visitors. Comprehensive Plan. Strategy 1.7.3 - Use technology to achieve more efficient land use patterns and more sustainable development. For example, this would include the use of smart parking systems to reduce the land area required for surface parking, and ensuring city-wide access to high speed broadband and wireless technology to facilitate working from home and telecommuting. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHART: LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION SHORT- I LONG- ONGOING THEME TERM TERM MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN Policy 5.4. Employment Strategy5.4.1- Utilize and maintain higher Generating Land Use Design floor area ratio and building height allowances & Regulations in certain industrial areas for manufacturing and Maintain land development warehouses than for other building types, due to regulations which support economic their unique function and space requirements. O Since the higher permitted FARs, standards shall growth, expansion into other be established to ensure that such buildings are economic sectors, and foster maintained as warehouses and not converted to achievement of the City's economic uses generating significantly higher development objectives. traffic volumes. Strategy5.4.2- Maintain a land use strategy for industrial and employment focused land that is consistent with the Economic Development Chapter. Strategy5.4.3- Continue to support quality site design for industrial uses as an investment in the community and employment districts, including O materials, landscaping and architecture. Strategy5.4.4 - As a means to attract and retain quality employees, develop employment centers which are supportive of quality of life needs of employees. Encourage the provision of O outdoor and indoor employee -serving amenities O in the City's workplaces, such as parks and plazas, outdoor seating areas, fitness facilities, bicycle storage areas and showers and related facilities. Strategy5.4.5 - Where high-quality natural amenities exist within or adjacent to developing industrial uses, integrate these areas into O ((c site design to support high-quality industrial JJl development. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN W 1 0 --- - - --- _ _ ------ -- _--- _ - -- - - - - ---- _ - - - - IINFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN i I i i \\-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------�/ I I I IASPHALT PARKING LO I o 0 I 15.0' I GRAVEL STORAGE AREA c a I I I I PROPOSED 60'X 120' BUILDING I 0 Mastircraft0ha# !:m door Concept Plan A 4 Monticello, MN fT Parcel ID: 155249001010 46 I 30.0' i CONCEPT DATA Gross Site Area: 1.44 Ac ± Proposed Zonina: 1-1 Front Setback: 30' Side Setback: 15' Rear Setback: 15' 0 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' M �73 1 (.D� Z D J_ m C� X EO �w/ LL F— D LL IL 50.0' ---------------------------------------------------------------- - \` I 1` INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN ---------------------------------------------- ASPHALTIPARKING GRAVEL STORAGE AREA o 3 / G v C � O a /11e n d c FUTURE 60'X 120' BUILDING mi Aastlrcrafte.t PROPOSED 60'X 120' BUILDING door Concept Plan B 4 Monticello, MN fT Parcel ID: 155249001010 46 30.0' CONCEPT DATA i Gross Site Area: Proposed Zoning: Front Setback: Side Setback: Rear Setback: 1 1.44 Ac ± 1-1 30' 15' 15' 0 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 2D. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Cross/Joint Parking Easement in the Riverfront Sub -District of the Central Commun District (CCD). Applicant: City of Monticello. Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Community Development Director 10/03/2023 Commission action): 10/23/2023 Additional Analysis by: Public Works Director/City Engineer, Community & Economic Development Coordinator ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Cross/Joint Parking Easement in the Riverfront Sub -District of the Central Community District (CCD). 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-31 recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Cross/Joint Parking within Block 51, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z and based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-31 recommending denial of the proposed Conditional Use Permit, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-31. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Lengthy Legal, Block 51 PID #: 155010051110 and 155010051111 Planning Case Number: 2023-37 Request(s): Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Cross/Joint Parking Easement in the Riverfront Sub -District of the Central Community District (CCD). Deadline for Decision: November 18, 2023 (60 -day deadline), January 17, 2024 (120 -day deadline) Land Use Designation: Downtown Mixed Use Zoning Designation: CCD, Central Community District (Riverfront Sub -District) 1 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Mixed Commercial/Parking Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial East: Mixed Uses (Block 52 Redevelopment) South: Commercial West: Commercial/Multi-family Residential Project Description: The project redevelops existing green space in the rear portions of the parcels to improve and establish a parking lot that will serve the existing parcel and be available for public use. ANALYSIS: The consideration is for shared parking serving the existing buildings in the subject area, as well as to accommodate general public use of the proposed parking lot. Additional parking is proposed to occur at the rear of two parcels. The first parcel, which is currently occupied by a salon use, fronts and gains its primary entrance from Walnut Street. The second parcel is owned by the City of Monticello and is currently occupied by an occasional store. The L-shaped parcel is located at the corner of Walnut and River Street and has a driveway access from River Street. On -street parking is available along Walnut Street, which is currently undergoing reconstruction. With this project, an additional 6 parking spaces are proposed in the rear of the two parcels. Three of these spaces will be on the salon parcel, three on the occasional store parcel. The proposed parking area will be accessible via a new access from the current parking area being reconstructed directly to the south. The installation of the access to the parking area will result in the loss of 3 stalls in that lot, but an additional 3 stalls created overall in the block area. The plan provided for the initial 6 -space parking area also illustrates the configuration of potential future parking, which would require an amendment to the conditional use permit. The smaller detached accessory structure on the City -owned parcel will be removed, with the larger detached garage remaining. The parking lot itself would be curbed, paved and striped to create the 6 spaces in accordance with code requirements. As a condition of approval, landscaping or a solid fence to screen the westerly -facing parking is recommended given the residential use on the adjacent parcel. If landscaping is used to screen, the landscaping should be consistent with the screening 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 landscaping installed with the parking area to the south. No additional lighting is planned at this time. The proposed parking lot development will provide additional spaces in support of the existing businesses and increase conformity for parking for the existing buildings through both the cross and joint use of the stalls. In addition, the redevelopment of Block 52 — including the redesign of Walnut Street — is intended to increase visitor use of the area for both existing and new businesses. This project and the CUP that facilitates it is an aspect of the City's provision for those needs. The zoning ordinance parking regulations allow property owners to share access and parking facilities to increase efficiency of the available parking lot areas by Conditional Use Permit. The CUP is recorded to document the allowance. In addition, an easement agreement will be prepared and executed which creates the cross -access permissions between the property owners and the City. The easement will establish the ability for the public to use these stalls. When reviewing Conditional Use Permits, the City's general standard is whether or not the proposed use is consistent with the existing and proposed uses and character of the neighborhood. In this case, the improvements create cross and joint parking and expand parking supply in direct support of revitalization of the area. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION The Comprehensive Plan, and most specifically, the Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan, emphasize the use of cross and joint use parking facilities, along with the aesthetic improvements of public areas as key to increasing the attraction of the downtown area to visitors and new development. This proposed project is an example of the City's pursuit of these goals, fully consistent with the Comprehensive Plan objectives. Staff recommends approval of the CUP, with the comments herein and the conditions included in Exhibit Z of this report. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-31 B. Aerial Site Image C. Parking Plan Z. Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit for Cross/Joint Parking PID #: 155010051110 and 155010051111 1. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff as related to coordination with Downtown Roadway & Pedestrian Improvement Plans. 2. Installation of landscaping screening or fenceline screening adjacent to the westerly -facing parking stalls. 3. Execution of a cross -access and parking agreement that provides for the shared public use of the stalls. 4. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. 4 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-31 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROSS/JOINT PARKING EASEMENT IN THE RIVERFRONT SUB -DISTRICT OF THE CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT PID #: 155010051110 and 155010051111 WHEREAS, the City, on behalf of the subject property owners, has submitted a request to construct a joint parking lot with cross -access in the rear yard portion of the subject properties; and WHEREAS, the proposed parking facility would improve the subject area and increase parking supply in the immediate area; and WHEREAS, provision of cross and joint parking requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, and WHEREAS, the site is zoned CCD, Central Community District, which allows and encourages such use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Downtown Mixed Use" for the area; and WHEREAS, the provision of joint parking, and the increase in efficiency of parking in the downtown area, is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Downtown Small Area Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 3rd, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that provide for increased and improved parking in an area where parking demand is, and is likely to be, significant. 2. The conditions of approval require that the improvements, including landscaping, screening, and other elements will contribute to the compatibility of the parking area with surrounding uses. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-31 3. The cross -use of the access and parking in this area can be done only through an agreement with all of the parties due to limited public street access. 4. The parking lot implementation meets the relevant goals and objectives of the applicable plans for the downtown. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for a cross/joint use parking facility and access to said parking, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: 1. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff as related to coordination with Downtown Roadway & Pedestrian Improvement Plans. 2. Installation of landscaping screening or fenceline screening adjacent to the westerly -facing parking stalls. 3. Execution of a cross -access and parking agreement that provides for the shared public use of the stalls. 4. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2023 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 1►[�7►��[�I��l1I_1►1►11►[e��]►�1► I[►Y.y[�7► By: Paul Konsor, Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 Consideration of a CUP for Cross Easement for Joint Parking in the CCD 15 501005 1110, 15501005 1111 Created by: City of Monticello � - %44% . ~ � CO IV ®Cb f - q� & 0� +. dares. . - % % Ex he\ �� e �4/ 2 o « � �•- WA L N U T STREET OFF-STREET PARKING STUDY M O N TI C E L L O | � CO � � e,l� o r Montcdo � m r1w1w BOLTON & M E N K Gm People Gm Solutions. Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 2E. Public Hearing - Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.012 — Definitions, as related to Public Building and Uses and Including Community Event Center. Applicant: City of nnf%n+„-oiin Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Stephen Grittman, City Planner 10/03/2023 Commission action): 10/23/2023 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Parks & Recreation Director ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance relating to Community Center uses and definitions. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-32 recommending approval of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance for definitions relating to Public Buildings and Uses based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-32 recommending denial of the proposed amendment, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-32. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: NA PID #: NA Planning Case Number: 2023-33 Request(s): Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Deadline for Decision: November 6, 2023 (60 -day deadline) January 5, 2023 (120 -day deadline) 1 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 Project Description: The Monticello Community Center provides space for a variety of public, quasi -public, and private uses. The proposed amendment seeks to add definition and clarity to the allowed uses under the term "community center", which is currently undefined, and the allowable uses within the public building. ANALYSIS Current Language and Uses. The Monticello Community Center is located in the CCD District on land that was acquired by the City of Monticello approximately 25 years ago. As a part of the development of the Community Center, a series of collective, but not necessarily related, uses were anticipated and incorporated within the project and site. These include space for the Monticello City Offices, public recreation space (including pool and gym), Army National Guard training and office space, Senior Citizen gathering space, various meeting and activity rooms, and a large assembly space to host City public meetings, private events, and several other large community events. In support of a variety of these uses, the Community Center includes concessions, management offices, and a commercial kitchen. The commercial kitchen facilities are currently utilized for a variety of in-house activities. However, the facilities are currently unused and underutilized for periods of time and could be made available to private entities that would take advantage of the equipment for off-site events and distribution or sale of products. The Community Center would rent the kitchen facilities for specific times and these specific uses when available. In evaluating this use, it was determined that the proposed use of the commercial kitchens within the building was not unlike the other rental activity already occurring within the building in terms of land use impacts and would be considered as allowable within the context of current uses and accessory uses within the building. However, the City's zoning regulations do not have a current definition for what constitutes a "Community Center". The MCC was developed and currently is permitted under the broader definition of "Public Building or Use" and is therefore a Permitted Use in the Walnut/Cedar subdistrict of the CCD. The Community Center qualifies in most respects as a public building, but the extent of the private use occurring within the building is less clear. "Public Building or Use" is defined as follows: PUBLIC BUILDING OR USE. Any facility, including but not limited to buildings and property that are leased or otherwise operated or funded by a governmental body or public entity. This definition is quite broad on one hand, and inadequately descriptive on another. While the City is clearly the funding and ownership party for the Community Center, there are already several private or quasi -public entities that regularly use specific portions of the building. To 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 10/03/2023 add clarity to this description, staff proposes an amendment to the ordinance adding a new definition for "Community Center". This definition is intended to both expand the understanding of what is permitted in the MCC, including private space rentals, but also keep other non-public entities from opening a "Community Center' in inappropriate locations due to the current lack of clarity. The additional text would amend the Definitions section of the Zoning Ordinance to add as a sub -definition of "Public Buildings or Use": COMMUNITY CENTER. A Public Building or Use that provides a variety of services and facilities for both public and private activities, including the following: City offices; US or State of Minnesota Military offices; recreation facilities and classes; public assembly uses; senior citizen community rooms and activities; event center gatherings; and support facilities for any of the above. Individual public spaces and/or facilities within a Community Center may be used, leased or rented to other entities, including private individuals or groups as an incidental and accessory aspect of such space or facility, at the discretion of the public agency owner/manager. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the amendment. As discussed in this report, the amendment will help define and limit the application of this specific use in the community and further the purpose of the Monticello Community Center by facilitating efficient use of the building and facilities, without compromising the internal compatibility, and mix of activities. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-32 B. Draft Ordinance No. XXX CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-32 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED TO THE DEFINITION OF "COMMUNITY CENTER" AS A PUBLIC BUILDING WHEREAS, the City of Monticello operates a variety of buildings for the purposes of providing public services to the community; and WHEREAS, the Monticello Community Center is one of the public buildings providing those services; and WHEREAS, facilities within the Monticello Community Center can be used, and are often utilized, by private individuals or entities in support of endeavors that serve the public good, and assist with economical operation of the Community Center; and WHEREAS, utilization of the Community Center facilities enhances the efficient use of such facilities and spaces, and is in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the current zoning ordinance does not define the uses allowed in, or the nature of, a "Community Center"; and WHEREAS, such a definition is important to both clarify and, when necessary, limit the use or establishment of such a facility; and WHEREAS, adding the definition serves both to benefit the ongoing management of the Monticello Community Center and clarifying allowances for future consideration; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 3rd, 2023 on the application and the applicant City of Monticello and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The zoning amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by accommodating the use of public property for compatible private activities that are important for the local economy. 2. The proposed amendment makes no other changes to the nature of uses that would otherwise make use of the Public Building in question. 3. The change in zoning language will continue to accommodate reasonable and efficient future use of the public facilities. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-32 4. The change in language will have no expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5.. The private uses resulting from rental transactions are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the proposed zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the zoning amendment to establish a definition of Community Center as defined in the companion ordinance. ADOPTED this Yd day of October, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION an ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 ORDINANCE NO.8XX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE XV, LAND USAGE, CHAPTER 153.012 - DEFINITIONS FOR PUBLIC BULDINGS AND USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. § 153.012 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended to add the following definitions: PUBLIC BUILDING OR USE. Any facility, including but not limited to buildings and property that are leased or otherwise operated or funded by a governmental body or public entity. COMMUNITY CENTER. A Public Buildinz or Use that provides a variety ofservices and facilities for both public and private activities, including the following: Ciiy oxices; US or State of Minnesota Military offlices; recreation facilities and classes; Public assembly uses; senior citizen community rooms and activities; event center gatherings; and support facilities for any of the above. Individual public spaces and/or facilities within a Community Center may be used, leased or rented to other entities, including private individuals or groups as an incidental and accessory aspect ofsuch space or facility, at the discretion of the public agency owner/many, ear. SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Chapter 153, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall. Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Passed by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, this day of , 2023. Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Planning Commission Agenda: 10/03/23 2F. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.060 — Landscaping and Screening, for Standards Relating to Native Landscapes. Applicant: City of Monticello Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Community Development Director 10/03/2023 Commission action): 10/23/2023 Additional Analysis by: City Attorney, Park and Recreation Director, City Planner, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Chief Building and Zoning Official ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt Resolution PC -2023-33 recommending approval of amendments to Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.060 — Landscaping and Screening, for Standards Relating to Native Landscapes, including Definitions, based on findings in said Resolution. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution PC -2023-33 recommending approval of amendments to Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.060 — Landscaping and Screening, for Standards Relating to Native Landscapes, including Definitions, based on findings in said Resolution. 3. Motion to table action for additional information. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Planning Commission is asked to consider amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance to address natural landscaping provisions enacted during the 2023 legislative session. The law adopted by the legislature effectively authorizes "managed natural landscapes" on any privately owned property. At present, City ordinance permits "native" landscaping on commercial, industrial, civic, or institutional uses with submission of an alternative landscaping plan. Native landscapes are allowed for residential properties only in other circumstances specifically allowed by the ordinance and approved by the Community Development Department. To comply with the new law, amendments are proposed to Section 153.060 - Landscaping and Screening section of the Monticello Zoning ordinance. Managed natural landscapes are defined within the new law and require both an intentional planting plan and on-going maintenance. As defined, these landscapes may include both native Planning Commission Agenda: 10/03/23 and non-native species. Importantly, the managed landscapes cannot include noxious weeds, which is consistent with the City's public nuisance ordinance. The amendments proposed include the following: • Addition of definitions for these landscape features consistent with the language as adopted by the legislature. • Allowance for managed natural landscapes with submission of an alternative landscaping plan. Plan submission allows staff to review the proposal for conformance to the definitions, provision for on-going maintenance, and stormwater and drainage considerations. The Community Development Department must approve the plan if it is consistent with the statute. The proposed ordinance includes a reference to resources for this type of landscaping, as well as a recommendation that the property owner meet with staff prior to plan preparation as a means to provide additional guidance. • Managed landscapes must be consistent with the other landscaping ordinance standards, including required screening and perimeter buffering, as well as base code standards for minimum site plantings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City staff recommend adoption of the proposed amendments. The amendments are consistent with recently enacted state law. In addition, allowance for more natural landscapes is in direct support of one of the three guiding themes of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan - Sustainability. The 2040 Plan integrates sustainability strategies across its planning spectrum, including private development. The 2040 Plan's Implementation Chapter cites a specific strategy for incorporation of sustainable design considerations throughout the development process. The conversion or increased practice of natural landscapes across all land use types supports sustainability through reduced water consumption and chemical application, as well as benefits to wildlife and pollination. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-33 B. Ordinance No. XXX C. MN Law 0734-0 D. League of MN Cities — Focus on New Laws for Managed Natural Landscapes E. Board of Soil and Water Pollinator Resource Guide F. Excerpt, Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan G. Excerpt, Monticello City Code — Public Nuisance 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-33 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO MONTICELLO CITY CODE XV, LAND USAGE SECTIONS 153.012 — DEFINITIONS AND 153.060 — LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE FOR MANAGED NATURAL LANDSCAPES WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has enacted § 412.925 allowing any privately owned lands or premises to install and maintain a managed natural landscape; and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend its regulations in conformance to the newly enacted legislation; and WHEREAS, the installation of managed natural landscapes supports the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan's goal for sustainability through reduced water consumption and chemical application, as well as benefits to wildlife and pollination; and WHEREAS, Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 3rd, 2023 on the application and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed ordinance amendment furthers the intent and the specific goals, policies and strategies of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan comprehensive plan for sustainability. 2. The proposed ordinance is expected to have no negative impacts on municipal public services. 3. The proposed ordinance provides conformity between City Code and State of Minnesota statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2023 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-33 1/[�7►��[�il]�e1►1�11►[e��Ii11/114[.Y.y[�1►1 Z ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 ORDINANCE NO.8XX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE XV, LAND USAGE, CHAPTER 153.012 - DEFINITIONS AND 153.060 — LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING, MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. § 153.012 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended to add the following definitions: MANAGED NATURAL LANDSCAPE. A planned, intentional, and maintained planting of native or nonnative ,grasses, wildflowers, forbs, ferns, shrubs, or trees, including but not limited to rain gardens, meadow vegetation, and ornamental plants. Managed natural landscapes does not include turf -grass lawns left unattended for the purpose of returning to a natural state. MEADOW VEGETATION. Grasses and flowering broad -leaf plants that are native to, or adapted to, the state of Minnesota, and that are commonly found in meadow and prairie plant communities, not including noxious weeds. ORNAMENTAL PLANTS. Grasses, perennials, annuals, and groundcovers purposefully planted for aesthetic reasons. RAIN GARDEN. A native plant garden that is designed not only to aesthetically prove properties, but also to reduce the amount of stormwater and accompanying pollutants from entering streams, lakes, and rivers. TURF -GRASS LAWN COVER. A lawn comprised mostly of grasses commonly used in regularly cut lawns or play areas, including but not limited to bluegrass, fescue, and ryegrass blends, intended to be maintained at a height of no more than eight inches. SECTION 2. § 153.060 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING is hereby amended as follows: (C) General requirements for landscaping. (7) Ground cover when no landscaping or site plan is required. All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with approved site or landscaping plans shall be seeded or sodded with lawn cover, except for managed natural landscapes as defined in Minn. Stat. § 412.925. Other gExceptions to this criterion may be approved by the Community Development Department as follows: For- eemmer-cial, in&str-ial, and institutional;��at�� Community Development Depat4meat. (ab) Undisturbed areas containing existing viable natural vegetation which can be maintained free of foreign and noxious plant materials. (be) Areas designated as open space or future expansion areas properly planted and maintained with prairie grass. (cd) Use of mulch materials such as bark, rock mulch over four mil poly, and wood chips in support of shrubs and foundation plantings. (F) Alternative landscaping plan. (1) Purpose. In cases where development conditions require a deviation from the landscaping standards in this section or the tree protection standards in § 153.061, Tree Protection, an alternative landscaping plan shall be required. Submission of an aAlternative landscaping plan shall be required may also be pr -o ide l for managed natural landscape na4w landseaping for- eemmer-eial, in&s4ial, eivie, and instittifienal use uses where the use of native pla-pAings represents eensisteney with the goals of the eempr-ehensive plan. An altemative !a-ndseaping plan shall indiea4e how eemplianee with the standafds in this ehapter- is impossible practicable-. Nothing in § 153.060(F) shall prohibit a development configuration that meets or exceeds the landscaping and tree protection standards in this chapter, or the allowances of Minn. Stat. § 412.925. (2) Justification. Alternative plans, materials, or methods may be justified due to: (a) Natural conditions, such as streams, natural rock formations, or topography; (b) The likelihood that landscaping material would be ineffective at maturity due to topography, placement, or other existing site conditions; (c) Lot size or configuration; (d) The presence of utility or other easements; (e) The potential for interference with public safety; a -ad (f) Installation and maintenance of managed natural landscapes; and (gf) Other situations where strict adherence to the landscaping or tree protection standards in this Chapter are determined to be impractical by the Community Development Department. (3) Allowable deviations. The Community Development Department shall approve any managed natural landscape that satisfies the definition thereof in Minn. Stat. § 412.925. The Community Development Department may also approve any alternative landscape plan if it meets the purpose and intent of § 153.060, Landscaping and Screening, or § 153.061, Tree Protection, as appropriate. Allowable deviations from the standards of this section include, but are not limited to the following: (a) Reduced planting rates due to public facilities. An adjustment to planting locations or reduction of up to 20% in the type or total number of required caliper inches may be W allowed when underground connections to public facilities, public utilities, or public easements or right-of-way cause difficulty in meeting the required standards. (b) Reduction in standards due to nature of parcel. A reduction in the count, spacing, or species variety standards by up to 20% may be allowed where the reduction is desirable in terms of protection of existing natural resources, better consistency with the goals of the comprehensive plan, or a site design that exceeds the quality of what would otherwise result under a strict application of the standards in this chapter, in the opinion of the Community Development Department. (c) Installation of managed natural landscapes and/or a native landscapes restoration plan. 1. Installation of a managed natural landscape shall be allowed when in conformance with the definitions of Minn. Stat.. 412.925. 2. Managed natural landscapes shall not be exempt from any applicable minimum planting requirements of this ordinance for required site landscaping, perimeter buffer yard, required screening, and vehicular use area plantings. 3. For managed natural landscapes, property owners are encouraged to review Minnesota Board of Soil and Water Conservation natural landscape resources and meet with representatives of the Community Development Department prior to developing the alternative landscaping plan. 4. For native landscape restoration, aA reduction of up to 10% in the type or total number of required caliper inches may be allowed where the reduction is desirable as an incentive to encourage the use of native plantings and/or the restoration of native plantings on lands dedicated for open space. (d) Planting on adjacent or alternative sites. In cases where required plantings cannot be easily sited on the subject parcel, alternative locations on adjacent or nearby parcels may be proposed. (4) Alternative landscape plan informational requirements. Alternative landscape plans shall provide the same information required by a general landscape plan as outlined in § 153.060(D). SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Chapter 153, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall. Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Passed by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, this day of , 2023. ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk 2 Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor 01/18/23 REVISOR MS/AD 23-02533 rhrs llloconlant can be made amailwhlc Printed�� in altcrnalivc linvnalP alum rcw"i State of Minnesota Page M, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NI*NFTV-TJ1IRD SESSION H. F. No. o. 73 4 01?:3CU11 Anihored by Iiansen. R.. Klcvom: PnrselI Nei son. Nf._ Pischer and (10kcrs The WWI was read for the 111rs1 11 flit and relcrrrd to tha Coal lnnice 1x1 state and I.rxoI t,owmment 1,inanre and Policy WI -27C013 Adoptiarn orRepon Plated an the [irnclal Register Rind h)i the Seeond Time I I A hill for an act 1 2 relating to local government; requiring cities to allow native landscapes on private I s land; prohibiting certain vegetation overgrowth within cities; proposing coding 1 4 for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 412. 1 5 BE 1T ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: I n Section 1. 1412.9251 NATIVE LANDSCAPES. 1 7 ta) A statutory city or ]tome rule charter city shall allow an owner. authorized agent, or I is authorized occupant of any privately owned lands or premises, to install and maintain a I Q inanag2ed natural landscape. For purposes of this section, the ten -ns are defined as follows: I 1(j ( 1) "managed natural landscape" means a planned, intentional, and maintained planting 1 11 of native or nonnative grasses. wildflowers, forts, ferns. shrubs, or trees. including but not 1 12 limited to rain gardens, meadow vegetation, and ornamental plants. Managed natural 1 1.3 landscapes does not include turf i rass lawns left unattended for the uurnose of returnina to 1 14 a natural state: 11s (2) "meadow vegetation" means grasses and flowering broad -leaf plants that are native I Ia to, or adapted to, the state of Minnesota, and that are commonly found in tneadom- and 1 17 prairie plant communities, not including noxious weeds. Noxious weed shall have the I I4 meaning assigned by section 18.77, subdivision 8; 1 11) {3) "ornamental plants" means grasses, perennials, annuals,"ornantental plants" means grasses, perennials, annuals, andgrotntdcoyers 1 y purposefully planted for aesti►etic reasons, for aestitietic reasons; Secimr) l 41/18/23 RFV1SOR MS/AD 23-02533 z 1 (4) "rain garden" means a native plant garden that is designed not only to aesthetically imErove properties, but also to reduce the amount of storm water and accomeanyingpoIIuta nts + from entering streams, lakes, and rivers; and 7 a (5) "turf -grass lawn" means a lawn comprised mostly of grasses commonly used in s regularly cut lawns or play areas including br,t not limited to bluegrass, fescue, and rve rass blends, intended to be maitttained at a height of no more than eight inches. (b) Managed natural landscapes may include plants and grasses in excess of eight inches 9 in height and that have gone to seed, but may not include any noxious weeds and must be 2 t+ maintained. 10 (c) Except as part of a managed natural landscape as defined in this section, any weeds I 1 or grasses growing upon any lot or parcel of land in a city to a greater heigltt than eight 2 12 inches or that have gone or are about to go to seed are prohibited. Scmiltl 1 LMCLEAGUE or MINNESOTA CITIES Focus on New Laws: Managed Natural and Native Landscaping Permitted in Cities July 7, 2023 Cities must now allow managed natural landscaping to be installed and maintained on all parcels. Effective July 1, 2023, municipalities are required to allow property owners and occupants to install and maintain managed natural landscapes. Chapter 62 (HF 1830*/SF 1426) is the omnibus state government finance bill that was signed into law on May 24, 2023. Article 3, section 9 creates a new provision of law as Minnesota Statutes, section 412.925: • Subpoint (a) requires all statutory cities or home rule charter cities to allow an owner, authorized agent, or authorized occupant of any privately owned lands or premises to install and maintain a managed natural landscape and defines a number of associated. • Subpoint (b) states that managed natural landscapes may exceed 8 inches in height and be allowed to go to seed, but must be maintained and cannot include noxious weeds. Subpoint (c) states that weeds and grasses that are not part of a managed natural landscape cannot exceed 8 inches in height or be allowed to go to seed. City ordinances that are not consistent with this change would not be enforceable and may need to be amended or repealed. Managed natural landscape defined "Managed natural landscape" is defined as a planned, intentional, and maintained planting of native or nonnative grasses, wildflowers, forbs, ferns, shrubs, or trees, including but not limited to rain gardens, meadow vegetation, and ornamental plants. Managed natural landscapes does not include turf -grass lawns left unattended for the purpose of returning to a natural state. The bill permits landowners to maintain managed natural landscapes in excess of 8 inches in height. However, weeds or grasses that are growing on land in a city, are taller than 8 inches, have gone to seed, and are not a part of a managed natural landscape are prohibited. The law went into effect July 1, 2023, and supersedes any local regulations requiring residents to maintain a managed turf -grass lawn. Lawn law history Minnesota is not the first state to pass legislation loosening local requirements with respect to residential lawns. In 2009, the Florida Legislature passed Florida Statutes 373.185, establishing a definition for "Florida -Friendly Landscaping" in the interest of preserving water and protecting local wetlands and waterfronts from lawn care runoff. This legislation encouraged, but did not require, local government authorities to consider permitting Florida -friendly landscaping, including the use of more native plants and grasses in residential yards. Similarly, in 2021, Maryland passed House Bill 322, which prohibited homeowners' associations from imposing unreasonable limitations on low -impact landscaping. The Minnesota bill follows the nationwide trend, but expands its authority significantly by not merely encouraging the use of native plants and grasses, or limiting only homeowners' associations from restricting such landscaping choices, but requiring cities to allow them and setting height requirements for turf -grass surfaces. Next step for cities The League recommends that cities and their attorneys review their local codes and ordinances to determine whether they have contradictory policies on the books. Read more news articles Your LMC Resource Craig Johnson IGR Representative (651) 281-1259 or (800) 925-1122 cjohnson@lmc.org Amber Eisenschenk Research Manager (651) 281-1227 or (800) 925-1122 aeisenschenk@lmc.org Planting for Pollinators Principles and Design for Residential Pollinator Habitat Monarch butterfly l Checkerspot butterfly Carpenter bee Rusty patched bumblebee r� Small Mining bee I W, • I8i-colored � . Sweat bee i YOUR YARD CAN BEE THE CHANGE! J -So 77q -A M11 OWE14 E EkVIRONMENT TRUST FUND B W S R� Planting for Pollinators Principles and Design for Residential Pollinator Habitat This resource was developed to accompany the state of Minnesota's Lawns to Legumes Program but can be used for anyone interested in creating and managing pollinator habitat. mot BWSR (�Z.t ENVIQONMENT ►NPM►TVR►L REWURCES TRUST FUND The Lawns to Legumes program A new state funding and technical assistance program designed to help establish residential pollinator habitat In support the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee and other pollinators. Goals: 1. Create critical pollinator habitat in residential yards. Z. Build public support for high-quality residential pollinator habitat. The good news is our mandate to provide critical habitat for the Rusty -Patched Bumblebee will also support Minnesota's other pollinators and wildlife, and improve air, soil and water quality. Creating and maintaining enough high quality plantings to support declining pollinator populations is an enormous effort. We need to change public perception of residential landscapes. We want Minnesotans to embrace pollinator habitat in our yards! Before you begin a pollinator planting project... You may have heard that native plantings are a lot of work to create and establish. This can be true, but this work is also enormously rewarding. Consider the following: • This type of project involves a time commitment. Creating and especially MAINTAINING your project will take time, especially in the beginning while your plants are becoming established. • Your commitment to maintain your planting promotes this effort in your community. You are demonstrating residential pollinator habitat to your neighborhood. • Your efforts add up! As a part of this statewide campaign to help protect Minnesota's pollinators, more people who build habitat connection in their neighborhoods means pollinators don't have to travel as far to find resources that they need to survive. Some messiness is OK ... when its well-planned and intentional. It is important to know your aesthetic goals before you begin a planting. Projects should be planned to ft into the context of their surroundings. When planting for pollinators, however, keep in mind that what we might think is messy is important for their survival. This includes diverse wildflowers, as well as a variety of nesting habitat (dead stems, brush, wood, rocks or rock piles, and areas with bare ground). • Are you ready to accept a slightly less groomed yard if it has clear environmental benefits? • What type of habitat will you provide? • How large will your project be? } �R What about stings? Is pollinator habitat dangerous? Wild native bees are unlikely to sting unless threatened. Wear your shoes ... the most threatening thing you can do is It's easy to confuse bees -mostly very docile, with social wasps -often aggressive if they have a nest nearby. Your planting is most likely to attract bees, butterflies, and moths. Wasps are less likely to visit, but if you do see them that's not a bad thing! Many wasps are important predators of garden pests. What if I am not a homeowner? You don't have to be a homeowner to participate in this program! The funding was allocated to residential properties (unfortunately this doesn't include businesses. schools or churches). But there are ways to participate even if you don't own your land. If you rent your home: Ask your landlord for permission to create a Pocket Planting. You will need to assure them that you will be responsible for the maintenance of the planting. The benefits to your landlord are reduced lawn maintenance and beautification of their property. Use a Community Garden plot: Planting flowering habitat in your plot not only helps pollinators but is beneficial for vegetable plots as well, since flowering habitat can help increase vegetable pollination rates. You will need to check if the garden is zoned for residential use. Help a neighbor. Maybe there is someone in your neighborhood who you could partner with to create pollinator habitat in their yard? • Plant in pots! You can create a garden on a balcony or outside an apartment with large pots. There are flowering perennial plants that will overwinter in pats with some protection, as well as annuals that are good foraging for pollinators. Be sure to protect your potted garden from wind so that pollinators can access it! We need YOU! Create pollinator plantings and contribute to the health and survival of our pollinators! t Why plant for Pollinators? Pollinators play an essential role in food production as well as maintaining healthy ecosystems. There are more than 450 native bee species in Minnesota, along with hundreds of species of flower -visiting butterflies, moths, beetles and native flies. The decline of pollinators and other beneficial insect populations worldwide and in here in Minnesota has led to significant concern by conservation professionals, legislators and the public. Contributors to pollinator decline include: • Habitat Loss • Pesticides: including Insecticides, Fungicides, and Herbicides • Parasites and Pathogens ■ Climate Change Planting habitat for pollinators and protecting it from pesticides is one of the easiest ways for you to help pollinators! Additional benefits include: habitat for other species, stormwater infiltration, soil microbial health, and carbon sequestration. And there are benefits for human communities, too, as we increase our opportunities to enjoy, examine, and engage with the natural world around us. AW ■- N!n .4 y L71 This guide is intended to help you, plan, install and maintain pollinator habitat in your yard. our hope is that there is new and helpful information for anyone planning a pollinator habitat project from life-long gardeners to those new to gardening. Thanks for helping pollinators! _A�_Ap" What Type of Project is Right for You? Pollinator Needs + Fast Facts r�- Goals + Assessing Site Conditions Planting Design: Creating a Sense of Order Plant Selection + Establishment 10-15 Managing Landscapes for Pollinators Outreach and observation 20-22 The Details: Project Descriptions Links + Additional Resources 31-32 The most important pollinator habitat you can create is one that fi is your lifestyle for so you can maintain long-term. Providing native perennial habitat and nesting resources will best support Minnesota pollinator populations. Planning how you can best maintain your project will help ensure success. See the chart below to decide what type of project works best for you and your neighborhood. Guide to Project Types: 1 trams can all Po"' pockets of flowering trees pollinator pollinator habitat:* and shrubs: lawn:* meadow: p23 p25 p27 p29 native plants shrubs and trees pollinator native plants potted potted lawn from seed seeds or potted a C) •■■ �.■■•■•. •. ••■■. U • sod removal or • dig holes 'over -seed or solarization or ro plant trees/shrubs • p • remove lawn and • sheet mulching or • sheet mulching re -seed • remove lawn & re -seed • hand weed, • hand weed, u especially • some may need especially in first • hand weed aggressive ro in first few years winter protection few years perennial weeds, vfrom rabbits • over seed to promote especially • divide plants as more flowers in first few years cc they outgrow their • prune annually E space • raise mower height • mow twice yearly to control annual weeds. • easier to maintain • best habitat value • easiest to maintain • can be difficult to for the least amount successfully establish of effort • adds habitat value in a dense turf lawn N + neat appearance • most work to maintain °'- • a great way to start • less habitat value o gardening! ■ best for smaller lots + than a native planting • best habitat value preference for a • recommended for managed look • less mowing than a •best for larger lots beginners! traditional lawn EI Typical turf lawns and foundation plantings don't support pollinator needs. • Native Plants: Wild bees, butterflies, and other native pollinators prefer native plants. Studies have found that native plants in residential gardens help enhance wild bee populations and diversity. (Pardee.2014) Blooms Through the Season: there are few or no blooming plants in many yards, and many that only provide a brief time period of bloom like the ones in this yard. (see below) Since residential landscaping often focuses on non-native plants (like hostas and daylilies), most yards do little to support butterfly caterpillars or specialist bees. see appendix Plant Lists • Nesting: Many nesting needs are overlooked or eliminated due to the way we manage our yards. Ground nesting and cavity nesting bees need specific conditions to survive and reproduce (e.g., access to soil, dead wood, and dead stems). see Xerces Society Nesting fact sheet • Protection from Insecticides and Fungicides: Most of us wouldn't intentionally spray bumble bees or butterflies with insecticides, but may use chemicals harmful to pollinators without making a connection to the harm These fips will help keep you and your pollinators happy and safe in your yard: ■ Be Calm: Remember, bees don't want to sting you! They only sting if they feel threatened, particularly when their nests are in danger. Don't swat at them, just remain calm and slowly move away. • Wear your shoes! Especially if you have a bee lawn you may have pollinators underfoot. Avoid walking barefoot through this part of your yard. • Plant away from doors: There is less chance of a negative encounter if your pollinator habitat is not in a highly trafficked area. • Avoid strong scents and bright colored clothes You are more likely to be visited by bees or wasps if you look and smell like a flower while you are in your garden. • Observe: Now that you are more comfortable around them, notice that they are not very interested in you, just your flowers. !VI Pollinator Needs: Food Minnesota's State Bee * Rusty -Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis Most of its native prairie habit is now formed or developed, contributing to its current endangered species status. Urban habitat has become increasingly important for the Rusty -Patched Bumblebee. m r p•`r�- J .. _.. Th d' 't f ,Ta. In . native plants + rfi Y. _1`1in this garden .rte` .�Y supports a .. ,t ; wide range of,. e.1 -, ti.�►► OL �• pollinators with • ,:' ;:T1 ,r: ` food... .''�*+;'}►��",��'� • `= 1Y ti ', Ar hic do Ink- �� .. F.i'� w r i •��1 .,�-�,��'•/ / L •ice f Ai y rti VIA JIM T .7+� _, �`• t i, +R4ry. - ti rlc�►" .� _ 41 Be; ed ...and shelter opportunities with stems and bunch grasses for nesting. � y �'4 C <h✓ kvspe bun . ilusry pai[hrd IIW- •' 6urnhlebee M�� bee 8i-cok.cd '. Sr,wl bee Pollinator foraging ranges vary by size and species, typically larger species have increased ranges. Planting a diverse range of flowers supports small specialist species .!lffr,.........r�1111' i last year's stem stubble supports cavity nesting bees Human expectations of an attractive yard can conflict with the nesting and overwintering needs of pollinators. Try to create some specific habitat for pollinators to nest and overwinter in. ) 41 Pollinators need ample habitat for shelter, nesting and overwintering. This includes dead stems of flowering plants, branches of flowering shrubs and trees, bare ground, leaf litter, dead wood and unmown grassy areas (that ideally include native bunch grasses). Ground nesting bees need bare or sparsely vegetated soil that is loose and well drained and in a sunny location. Jr 1 w Irl L l tPhil crevices + bare earth: support ground nesting needs Factors such as square footage, function, existing plant communities, soil moisture levels, weed pressure, hardiness zone, and local ordinances should be considered when designing habitat plantings. Always protect pollinator habitat from insecticide and fungicide use to prevent harmful exposure. PRIORITIZE THESE Low Pesticide Risk Connection to other Habitat Plant Diversity Access to Water and Nesting , MAKE DESIGN DECISIONS Planting Size Plant for Specific Pollinators or Generalists f Aesthetics Blooms through the seasons THINK LONG TERM Regular Maintenance Habitat Value 4I Outreach Project Lifespan LTJ Development, roads and tilled fields have decreased food and nesting sources for many pollinator species. Creating habitat corridors that connect existing natural areas and quality habitat is key to supporting pollinators in Minnesota. Your yard can be an important part of these corridors! Imagine your neighborhood from a pollinator's perspective: How far does a pollinator need to fly from its nest to food and water sources? R wide range of habitat will support small bees that have short flight distances as well as larger pollinators. Resource availability throughout the year + How you can help winter spring summer fall spring -fall overwintering early pollen and nectar abundant pollen. nectar abundant pollen and nectar wa'er habitat + nesting habitat and nesting habitat + overwintering habitat so c 1 J Leave flower stalks provide critical plant for continuous leave plant provide clean. Intact over the early blooms bloom to create material, leaves. shallow, water winter. Prune back such as willows, consistent rood stems. woody debris close to food In early spring to fruit trees, and resources in your yard to and nests heights of t3" to 24" spring wildflowers provide shelter for the winter Cues of Care: Carefully planned additions to the landscape help indicate that a garden is intentional and maintained. Include Signs Features %.I =U IIU Borders • Create Borders by mowing edges or creating pathways with mulch or ground cover in the areas immediately adjacent to sidewalks, driveways, and property lines. • An Orderly Framework prevent plants from obstructing traffic and falling into the neighbors' properties or onto the sidewalk. This framework also shows tidiness and human intention. • Add Architectural Features and human elements such as fences, lawn ornaments, wildlife houses and feeders, and keep features well maintained. • Include Signs to communicate with your neighbors about your project and promote pollinator and natural habitats. see sign option feaWred in the appendix Avoid plants treated with Neonic insecticides and other harmful pesticides Ful Where you buy your plants Is very important. Some nurseries treat their plants with insecticides and fungicides that can be harmful to pollinators in your garden. • Ask about pesticide use and see the MN DNB's list of native plant retailers. seeWildones and DNR resources lists in appendix • Select plants based on site conditions such as soil type, sun exposure, and moisture levels. A good retailer can help you choose your plants if you know your garden's conditions. see planting templates in appendix • Choose high-quality native plants that will supply pollinators with abundant nectar and pollen, see plant lists in appendix • Support entire Recycles by including food plants for caterpillars (such as milkweed) and nesting plants for bees (such as native plants with pithy stems). • Buy locally Produced Native Plants: this helps protect nearby native plant communities and provides plant species that are sure to be compatible with local insect populations. see plant lists and Wild fines resources list in appendix Most pollinators have adapted with native plant communities. Native plantings provide the best support for native pollinator species. Choose a range of native plants based on the following considerations: Continuous Plan for continuous bloom throughout the growing season this Blooms helps ensure pollinators have food when they need it, and allows them to conserve energy by not having to travel long distances when blooms are scarce. Include an assortment of flower colors, sizes, shapes and scents to attract a Variety of pollinators see planting templates in appendix • Group plants together to help pollinators find and access resources more easily. It also creates a sense of order in your planting. flowering trees and shrubs are an excellent way to • Best Selections: A number of sources provide information on provide continuous blooms specific plant species that provide excellent pollen and nectar when there are limited resources for native bees, monarchs, and other pollinators. early season options for see plant lists in appendix pollinators There are many options for residents who want to convert lawns to pollinator habitat but don't have time or expertise with yardwork. You may be able to hire a professional to help install and /or maintain your project. • Sustainable Lawn Care: Look for companies that specialize in sustainable practices and have an understanding of good pollinator habitat. • see Wild Ones resources list ■ Weeding Assistance: If you choose to plant a pollinator garden, plan for weekly weeding, especially in the first year. For a sural,l garden this is typically 1/2 hour of weeding each week. You can hire gardeners to weed your planting, typically on a bimonthly or monthly schedule. ,y Some gardeners offer ala carte weeding or installation as needed. • Design Assistance: landscape architects and garden designers can create plans for pollinator plantings and plant lists for your specific site and needs. • see Wild Ones resources list u Some landscape design businesses also offer maintenance services. • Avoid maintenance contracts that include insecticide or fungicide use. For any type of project, you will need a strategy to remove the current vegetation. There are many ways to accomplish this task, some might work better for your project than others: Remove Existing `\ Vegetation Herbicide Application followed by tilling can be used for preparing a garden bed, but several rounds of herbicide and tilling may be needed for sufficient control. This is not beneficial to soil health. There are other methods to prepare your planting: Alternatives to Herbicides: The xerces Society has developed a guide to organic site preparation methods such as the use of clear plastic to control weeds solarization shown below for instructions: see appendix • Sod Removal: it is a good idea to cutaway the sod prior to planting to effectively remove weed roots and seeds. This can be accomplished with sod cutters, sod kickers or shovels for smaller areas. sod kicker shown below • Sheet Mulching: Layering cardboard and mulch to suppress existing vegetation is a way to make pollinator bed prep easier. Renaissance Soils sheet mulching instructions: see appendix Save your soil! Site Preparation Preventing erosion and preserving soil moisture are important to the health of your new planting. Assemble Plants,` ` all the materials you will need ahead of time, and have a plan for where you will install each plant. Protect Your Soil • Prevent soil erosion and loss of soil moisture. Don't remove existing vegetation until you are ready to plant. This shouldn't be more than a few days, and ideally is the same day. ■ Erosion control may be needed for areas with steep slopes. Containerized plants can be installed directly into erosion fabric by Gutting holes for planting. Avoid synthetic fibers. • Weed Suppression Mat (below) Paper or natural fiber fabric can be helpful for weed control, but make sure to provide nearby areas of open soil for nesting habitat. • Mulch: If you choose not to use a weed suppression fabric, plan to mulch your plants immediately after planting. This prevents new weed seeds from sprouting and conserves soil moisture for your plants. • apt for un -dyed mulch as if is less likely to contain chemicals which might harm pollinators. W _ IL 41k r* Ali AIL .- ;4�L a Preparing an area for sowing seed requires more weed control than site prep for containerized plants. Small seedlings can't compete with weeds the way larger plants do. Careful preparation can create the best conditions for your newly seeded garden. Prepare for Seeds Herbicide application followed by tilling can be used for preparing a garden bed, but several rounds of herbicide and tilling may be needed for sufficient control. If you want to avoid herbicides see the folowing options: Alternatives to Herbicides: • Solarization: The Xerces Society has developed a guide to organic site preparation methods such as the use of clear plastic to control weeds solarization shown below instructions: see append ix. Sheet Mulching: Layering cardboard and mulch to suppress existing vegetation is a way to make pollinator bed prep easier, unlike the method for containerized plants, the cardboard and mulch will need to be removed before seeding. Renaissance Soils sheet mulching instructions. see appendix • If you till your soil, Cover crops are a good option prior to planting, and can be grown over the spring, summer, and early fall to prepare the soil for seeding in the late fall (an excellent time to seed wildflower plantings) Planting Tips Contoinerized plants, trees and shrubs are planted in similar ways. The most important elements of planting are digging o large enough hole for your plants, and planting at the right depth. rs � Containerized plants, not seeds, are the best choice for new gardeners and smaller gardens. They allow more control over layout and design of your garden, mature and bloom faster and have a higher survival rate. Here are some important planting tips: • Dig a hole as deep and 2-3 sizes wider than the pot. • Remove the pot, • Loosen roots and remove any roots that have grown in a circle around the base of the plant, • The soil level should be just below the flare of the tree or shrub and the base of I your plant. I o Mulch around the plant, but don't place mulch against the stem or trunk • Water immediately after planting, then once a week for the first summer. 4 •7r� It can take much longer to establish native plants from seeds, and it can be difficult for new gardeners to distinguish weedy plants from desired species. Plants in containers tend to be the best choice for smaller plantings. However, seed mixes can be a cost efficient way to introduce diversity in larger pollinator plantings. Sowing Seeds Planning to seed a large pollinator meadow? Include some of these annual species attractive to pollinators: alyssum, basil, borage, calendula, coleus, crocus, cosmos, dill, pansy, hyacinth, lavender, melon, nasturtium, nicotiana, partridge pea, snapdragon, sunflowers, verbena, zinnia • Buy Locally Produced Native Seeds This helps protect nearby native plant communities and provides plant species that are sure to be compatible with local insect populations. see Wild Ones resources list in appendix • Sow in Late Fall, Spring, or Early Summer Many native seeds need exposure to winter conditions to help break their dormancy. • Ensure Good Seed to Soil Contact spread seeds on top of the soil surface and lightly rake them into the soil to achieve good soil contact. Be careful to plant the tiny flower seeds near or on top of the soil surface. A common mistake is to plant native seed too deep. • Atter Sowing Lightly pack the soil surface. You do not need to provide native plant seedlings with supplemental watering as long as they receive about one inch of rainfall a week. • Do Not Fertilize Native plants are well -adapted to poor soils, if necessary, amend with 112 " of compost annually. Management can be one of the most important factors in a planting's long- term success. • Allow Bare SOIL Keep an area in a well -drained, ideally south -facing planting bed bare and mulch free to support ground nesting pollinators -they make up 80% of native bees. • Mulch Sparingly If if is needed for weed suppression and erosion control, only apply mulch the first few years until plants fill in and are established. One exception to this rule: you can mulch thickly around the border of your planting to define the edge. see page 8, Planting Design: Creating a Sense of order Habitat Create Overwintering Area$ Leave some woody debris near your planting Management and leave plant material standing through the winter. ■ Leave Standing Stems over the Winter When cutting back wildflower stems in the fall. Leave standing stubble 12"-18" tall to provide nesting sites for sterni -nesting bees to lay their eggs in. This stubble will break down naturally with time. Incorporate clean water in your yard by adding bird baths, saucers, water features, or rocks with shallow indentations, and change the water frequently to prevent mosquito larvae from hatching. Bee Lawns and mow -able pollinator friendly plant species need specific management techniques. • Adjust Mowing Frequency and Timing Wait to mow until lawns are 41/2" high and raise the mowing height to 3" or higher. Allow dandelions and clover to flower in turf areas. u This is especially importanf early in fhe season when pollinator food sources are limited. • Overseeding: Scalp your lawn: cut grass to 1 " height or less and broadcast a specific bee lawn mixture of flowers such as White Dutch clover, Creeping Thyme, Bee Lawn Self heal and Ground Plum and Violets. Management „ Alternately, many of these flowering species can be added as containerized plants. ■ Aeration or Compost Addition can aid seed -to -soil contact and germination rates. Broadcast 112" of compost across the whole yard and seed into that layer. Use approximately 6 yards of compost for a standard sized yard (>4,000 ft7) . • Limit Herbicide Use Pian to spot weed manually if needed, herbicides will negatively affect your flowering lawn species. • Skip the Fertilizer Bee lawns with clover shouldn't need additional fertilizer as clover fixes nitrogen in soils. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) can help prevent and reduce pesticide applications by correctly identifying pests and determining acceptable thresholds for economic and aesthetic loss. • Use a Tiered Approach If management is needed, use non -chemical methods first, such as mechanical, cultural, and biological controls. • C hoose Least Toxic Options + Timing If these methods are unsuccessful and pesticide use is warranted, select the least toxic option, follow pesticide labels exactly, and avoid applications when pollinators are active. Integrated Pest Management: see appendix - e • Don't Spray! These are plantings for insects. Think of the larger ecosystem benefits that your planting offers: besides supporting pollinators, you are �r providing food for birds, other beneficial animals like amphibians and bats, and supporting cleaner air and water. Integrated • Choose Disease and Pest Resistant Plants Native plants and proven Pest cultivars tend to have less disease issues than non-native hybrids, leading to Management fewer long-term maintenance issues. • Avoid Pesticides Opt for plants that have not been treated wifh systemic insecticides and other pesticides. Ask your nursery if any insecticides have been used. • Use a Tiered Approach If management is needed, use non -chemical methods first, such as mechanical, cultural, and biological controls. • C hoose Least Toxic Options + Timing If these methods are unsuccessful and pesticide use is warranted, select the least toxic option, follow pesticide labels exactly, and avoid applications when pollinators are active. Integrated Pest Management: see appendix - e One of the most rewarding parts of a pollinator plantings is observing the different types of insects that benefit from a project. Record Keeping: consider documenting the seed mixes and plants that were used for a project. Record the timing of planting and management and observations about insects that used the plantings. • Phenology: note seasonal variations in plant emergence, first pollinator C sightings and climatic changes. What's Goin�q On In There . Spur Community Action: Your project can be a catalyst for engaging the public in the larger pollinator conversation. This can promote community support for your efforts as well as inspire of hers to take action on this issue. Alt A lze #, • Tell Your Story -There are many programs to track your habitat efforts: » Bumble Bee Watch » Monarch Larva Monitoring Project » Monarch Watch D Journey North >> Minnesota Bee Atlas . Imo. .. 1 i Talk to your neighbors about your project, increase awareness of declining pollinator populations and the Important role of urban habitat creation and connections. • Neighborhood Conversations: Research has shown that changes in landscapes are more likely to be accepted if neighbors are demonstrating the new practices. I ■ Signs: pollinator gardens and plantings are likely to attract attention 1 from neighbors and passersby. This can be an opportunity to educate EnCOUra ing and inform your community of the purpose of the pollinator habitat, and Conversations possibly spark interest in others to create their own. • Social Media: provides instant exposure that promotes your project and promotes the larger conversation of critical pollinator habitat. ■ Host a Native Plant Garden Tour and share what you have learned! ■ Start a Native Plant Swap in your community, via social media or create an in-person event. Local politicians, land managers, community planners, educators, landscape business and parks staff might not realize how important pollinator habitat is. Your efforts can make a difference in local ordinances and regulations. � • Pollinator Initiatives: Many community groups, conservation organizations, state and local agencies, and universities have extensive information about pollinator efforts and other forms of outreach. • Encourage your city or organization to sign a resolution supporting pollinators, some examples are the Xerces Society's Bee City, USA and Bee Scale Up Campus, USA programs. Your Efforts ■ Social Media can be a platform for showing support for greater community efforts in support of pollinator habitat. Promote your project to community leaders and ask them to support similar efforts. ■ A Press Release can provide exposure of your project to the public who might not be reached by social media, agencies, and companies near and far. For home gardens, local newsletters or newspapers can inform your neighbors of your project. • Public Events, workshops and summits can be great places to talk about ways to increase the impact of creating pollinator habitat and share information and best practices. A boulevard or alley can be a good way to begin creating pollinator habitat on a residential lot. Start small and expand the areas over time. Ask for help: sustainable landscape experts, master gardeners, wafer stewards or neighborhood gardeners might have suggestions for their favorite native plants. • Start Small and add to your garden over time. Its important to plan a garden that you will have enough time to maintain. Plan for a half an hour of maintenance a week for the first growing season. • Create Borders to help prevent the landscape from looking untidy. Mulch, edging, stones or low ground covers work well to create a border. • Be Patient. It often takes a while for native plants to look their best, but when they do, it's worth it! ■ Choose Plants and Layout Carefully. Keep taller plants to the back of plantings. Smaller cultivars of native plants may be appropriate. As with all pollinator plantings, try to provide blooms throughout the season. see planting design templates in appendix • Check with Your City to ensure that your plan meets vegetation ordinances. Pocket Planting: Native Plants A boulevard or alley can be a good way to begin creating pollinator habitat on a residential lot. Start small and expand the areas over time. Ask for help: sustainable landscape experts, master gardeners, wafer stewards or neighborhood gardeners might have suggestions for their favorite native plants. • Start Small and add to your garden over time. Its important to plan a garden that you will have enough time to maintain. Plan for a half an hour of maintenance a week for the first growing season. • Create Borders to help prevent the landscape from looking untidy. Mulch, edging, stones or low ground covers work well to create a border. • Be Patient. It often takes a while for native plants to look their best, but when they do, it's worth it! ■ Choose Plants and Layout Carefully. Keep taller plants to the back of plantings. Smaller cultivars of native plants may be appropriate. As with all pollinator plantings, try to provide blooms throughout the season. see planting design templates in appendix • Check with Your City to ensure that your plan meets vegetation ordinances. The best ways to start a small pollinator bed are either removing sod or existing vegetation by hand or sheet mulching. See tips and timelines below to choose the method best for you. -Sheet Mulching is a good option for converting turf or existing plants that don't have deep roots. Most weeds and seeds can be suppressed with sheet mulch, but avoid this option for areas with tree seedlings, or plants like quack - grass, lily of the valley, snow on the mountain or creeping bellflowers. quack grass: roots and plant creeping bellflower: plant + rhizomes lily of the valley snow on the tree seedlings mountain SHEET MULCHING TIMELINE: determine prepare site chose plants if you haven't water weekly wait to cut back cut back stems planting size, using sheet and layout already, until plants are stems or remove to a variety shape and mulching acquire plants established plant material of heights for location method create holes in to provide next diverse stem sheet mulch and pian to plant pull weeds year's nesting nesting species to suppress plant into them. within a few weekly habitat weeds or Or wait until days so they enjoy seeing the lawn,this spring to plant. don't dry out first pollinators process will or become of the season? take a few root -bound months 1 Year 1 Year 2 ------------------------- ---- 6 ----V_ ------------------- ----- 8.5------V Spring June to August Autumn hrs May to early lune Summer Autumn hrs April -May total time total time • Hand Digging will be most successful for areas with existing deep rooted plants (see above). It is the fastest timeline for installing a pollinator bed, but the most physical labor. Be sure to remove all the root material if you have the plants pictured above. They will resprout from any root fragment. HAND DIGGING TIMELINE: determine using a shovel acquire plants water weekly wait to cut back cut back stems planting sire, or garden fork or seed until plants are stems or remove or remove plant shape and (best for deep established plant material material location rooted plants), plant within until spring to dig, lift, shake a few days so mulch around provideover- enjoyseeing the chose plants and remove they don't dry your plants wintering habitat first pollinators of and layout existing plants. out or become {leaving some for pollinators the season root -bound bare soil} or rake smooth. pull weeds iAn Year 1 --------------------------------------------------------14.5 ----- ----- Spring May to early June Summer Autumn hrs May i 5 total time 4 Trees and 5 25 Native flowering trees and shrubs can offer a lot of benefits to pollinators, both as food sources and habitat. • The early spring blooms of flowering shrubs and trees are a great way to provide food for pollinators when resources are limited. ■ Choose native shrubs and trees when possible. • Wait to prune shrubs until offer blooming. Prune for nesting, leave some woody debris and allow some old canes of currants and raspberries to remain. • Pruning is a once o year task that keeps shrubs and small trees looking their best. Not sure how to prune your trees and shrubs? Hire a professional or consult UMN Extension for tips. - _ SN- lL wt's'}i, rr . _e- �- W Top Ten Shrubs/ Trees for Native Bumblebees: Wild Currant Ribes spp Serviceberry Amelanchier spp Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis Native Bush Honeysuckle Dervilla spps. Plums and cherries Prunus species Willows Salix spp. 5pirea Spiraea spp. American basswoodTil ia americana Lead Plant Amorpha canescens Cranberry Vaccinium macrocarpon plant f sts; see appendix hr Flowering Trees and Shrubs h1 =15min=m0 7 r �� .�� rR•• ,+ r.r y ail. Ras bevies. area bee,- _ � •, ,,�;,• •day- ��:. Plant them %, ►�+# against a J y sunny wall to contain their r► _� ,: , spreading , yr habit.7. 00 ■ • � ii., ; it . 1 The primary pollinators of *' ►+ Blueberries are native bees! ` +R ' r �`�'� a Support them; i year-round fory�?r' more fruit. jell Ike ap- ,`1' I, A small i "' Bonus: Serviceberry's ]; ,• p2.� 5erviceberry ��•.'�� ;��, T fall color is stunning! free shares a +� woodland with Oaks and Aspen L. 41 Z. SPRING BLOOMS j !� r FALL COLOR 26 4 -� This project type varies in time and investment. A pollinator lawn could be as simple as allowing existing clovers and violets to flower, but it is most beneficial to seed a specific pollinator lawn - mixture. • Choose Carefully: would your neighbors prefer a more managed look? Maybe a pocket planting would be a better option. ■ Seed into an Existing Yawn this is more challenging but can be done. Follow the steps in these partner groups' Maintenance guidance. see Appendix: Pollinator Lawn fact sheets =Success ■ Pick the right Flowers you may need a seed mixture that is right for the condition, of your yard. Some plants do better in shade, others full sun. Your soil conditions can also determine what will grow successfully in your yard. j ■ Maintenance Determines Success see lawns require specific management to benefit pollinators. (See timelines on Signsnext page.) Guidance for creating a Pollinator lawn from Metro Blooms and the Pollinator Friendly Alliance can help you install your own project. Alternatively, some garden design and lawn care companies can help you establish your flowering lawn, see Appendix Bee Lawn fact sheets AIIOW LAWN TO FLOWER TIMELINE: raise mower blade to 3" wait to mow until lawn is >3" high. 1 Year i -------------- ---- ❑ May -June hfs additional time ■ Install ❑ Pollinator Lawn -Starting from no lawn or completely replacing your lawn see Appendix: Pollinator Lawn fact sheets INSTALL A POLLINATOR LAWN TIMELINE: remove existing areate with a shovel or machine for water weekly if your Bee Lawn is vegetation using better germination rates. until plants are a clover mixture, recommended established no need to methods spread seed at recommended rates fertilize. (see appendix) raise mower alternately, mix seed into compost and blade to 3"and get your soil apply to desired areas. wait to mow tested to see if See Pollinator Friendly Alliance Fact when blooms are fertilization is time varies: Sheet present (every 2 necessary. 3 hrs 3 2 ..5 34 ] months irrs Irr; min hrs May to early June Summer Autumn hand weed as needed. herbicides are not recommended they will kill your flowering plants. 1 Year 1 -- ]15 ------------- hrs May 15 total lime • Civerseeding Existing Lawn allows flexibility but may be more difficult to establish. OVERSEEQING TIMELINE: mow your aerate with a shovel or machine for water weekly if your Bee Lawn is hand weed as yard to 1" bettergermination rates. until plants are a clover mixture, needed. established no need to take to spread seed at recommended rates fertilize, herbicides are not remove lawn raise mower recommended clippings alternately, mix seed into compost and blade to Yand get your soil they will kill your apply to desired areas. wait to mow tested to see K flowering plants - See Pollinator Friendly Alliance Fact when blooms fertilization is Sheet are present necessary. (every 2 weeks) QO 1 Year 1 --------------------------------------------------------]15-----------11 Maytoearty]une Summer Autumn hrs May 15 total time One of the most beneficial project types for multiple reasons, large native plantings requires space, time to establish and regular maintenance to succeed. • Consider Your Site: Most native wildflowers need full sun conditions, but there are woodland species with pollinator benefits too. Assess your soil type and moisture level, Site Preparation is Key: It is important to provide the best possible r .YrJ'. '` ' �•� site preparation to prevent failure due to weed pressure, low seed Maintenance germination and preventable maintenance issues. =Success • Pick the Right Seeds "Local eco -type" seeds are the best possible choice for your seeding project, ft is also important to plan the species make-up and amount of seed for each species. • Maintenance Determines Success Native plantings require specific management to become established enough to suppress weed species and to regenerate year after year (See timelines on next page.) �� . � r The best ways to start a large pollinator planting are either removing vegetation using solarization, herbicide or manual removal. Tips and timelines below. ■ Solarization is a good option for converting turf or existing plants without using herbicides. It is important to follow the directions carefully to ensure success. See Xerces site prep fad sheet -appendix SOLARIZATION- NATIVE PLANTING TIMELINE: determine prepare site using chose seed and manage mow regularly monitoryour switch to a planting size, solarization or layout your to 5-8" height p!anting for biennial mowing shape and alternate method planting: to suppress pollinator species system location seed according to you will flowering to suppress weeds xerces Establishing need weeds consider enjoy seeing the research or lawn,this Pollinator to mow citizen science first pollinators of seed mixtures process will take a Meadows fact once your rake away thick applications to the season! and site few months sheet in appendix plants have mowing debris share your findings conditions reached 5-8" � 1 1 year 3 Year 2 ------------------------ ----- la ----------------- ---------- ------ 8.5 ------ --- Spring June to August Oct -pec hrs May to June Summer April- Oct hrs May 15 total time total time Herbicide or Hand Digging will be most successful for areas with existing deep rooted plants (see below). It is the fastest timeline for installing a pollinator bed, but the most physical labor. Be sure to remove all the root material if you have the problematic weeds pictured below. Herbicide might be the most time efficient method, reed canary grass rhizome and plant smooth brome bull thistle crown vetch barberry HERBICIDE OR HAND DIGGING NATIVE PLANTING TIMELINE: determine prepare site chose seed and manage your mow regularly monitor your planting size, using herbicide layout planting: your to 12"height planting for shape and or alternate will need to to suppress pollinator species location method to Seed according mow once flowering suppress weeds to xerces your plants weeds consider Research Establishing have reached citizen science seed mixtures Pollinator 12" rake awaythick applications to and site Meadows fact mowing debris share your findings conditions sheet See appendix ---- ---------- ---------- Winter Fajl to early Spring siberian elm box elder switch to a biennial mowing system enjoy seeing the first pollinators of the season! An Ah Year 1 ------------------------- ZO------------ Summer Summer -Autumn hrs May 15 total time Links allinator Needs: niversity of Minnesota Bee Lab Ips://www.beelob.0 m n.ed u / linnesota DNR Resources fps://www.dnr.state.mn.us/pollinator-resources/index.htrni Hssessing Site Conditions: Xerces Society Habitat Assessment Guides ht tps.//xerces.org/pol I ina t or -c on5erva t io n / habi t at -a ssessmen t -guides/ Xerces Society Pollinator -Friendly Parks Guides https://xerces.orglpublications/g u idelines/po Ilina tar -f de n d ly- parks Planting Design Examples: Metro Blooms Garden Awards Archive https://metroblooms.org/aword_yecir/201 S/ L Plant lists: Blue Thumb Plant Finder http://bluethumb.org/plants/ BWSR h t t ps://bwsr.s tate.m n. us/pol lina tor-toolbox-selec t ing-plants-and-seem-mixes Xerces Society Pollinator -Friendly Plant Lists hitps://xerces.org/pollinalor-conservrot-ion/plant-Ilsts/ A Plant Suppliers: DNR Native Plant Suppliers and Landscapers in MN h t t ps://www.d nr.state.mn. u s/gardens/n o t i vepla n l s/s u ppl iers.h t m l Site Preparation: Xerces Society Organic Site Preparation ht t ps://xefces.org/g uidelines-organ is-si te-preparo lion/ Lawn to Wildflowers haps://l awntow ilditowers. org/ Managing landscapes for Pollinators: Bee Lawns - University of Minnesota Bee Lab https!llwww.beelob.umn.edu/wild-bees/v iId-bees-flowers/kneelawn Blue Thumb Pollinator -Friendly Lawn h t t p://www.bl u e-thumb.org/turta l temat ives/pollinotor-friendly-bee-law n/ Managing Landscapes for Pollinators: Integrated Pest Mgmf ,7 MP Managing Landscapes for Pollinators Community Outreach: land managers, community planners, educators, landscape Contributors CONTENT DAN SHAW, MN BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES LORINDA BALFANZ, MN DEPARTMENT OFADMINISTRATION ALI BOESE, MN BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES SARAH FOLTZ-JORDAN, XERCES SOCIETY GRAPHIC DESIGN AND LAYOUT ALI BOESE, MN BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES SPECIAL THANKS TO HEATHER HOLM FOR SHARING HER POLLINATOR IMAGES USED IN THIS BOOK! htips://www.pollinalorsnativepicints.com/about-the-oLrihor.htmi r rt. � w i �= y A � , �vw 8 Photo Credits `i A Page., Cover collage, Ali Boese Intro Red Admirals at Berger Bank, Beltrami county BWSR staff Why Plant for Pollinators -clockwise from top left -1 &2 Rich Harrison, 3 & 7 Heather Holm, 4,6 & 9 Ali Boese, 5 BWSR staff, 8 Candy Sorikoda 1, Rusty Patched Bumble Bee, Heather Holm, Typical Turf Yard, Ali Boese 2. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee, Heather Holm , Plants, Trees and Shrubs, Ali Boese 3. Best Pollinator garden, Metro Blooms 4. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee, Heather Holm Stem Nesting diagram, Heather Holm. Ground Nesting Bee, Heather Holm 5. no photos 6. Base image, Google Earth, Ground Nesting Bee, Heather Holm, Goldenrod and Bumble Bee, Rich Harrison 7. no photos S. An Orderly Planting, Ali Boese 9. Non -Native pollinator plants, Ali Boese 10. Plants, Trees and Shrubs, All Boese 11. Maintenance, Ali Boese 12, Cardboard layer, BWSR staff, Sod Kicker BWSR staff 13. Volunteer planting, Pollinator Friendly Alliance, Landscape Fabric, Dan Schutte 14, Solarization, The Xerces Society, Cardboard layer, BWSR staff 15. Planting Event, Pollinator Friendly Alliance, Planting Details, Ali Boese 16, An Orderly Planting, Ali Boese 17. Johnson High School, Rich Harrison, Ground Nesting Bee, Heather Holm 18. clockwise from top left: Valets, Lily Shaw. Pollinator lawn, Ali Boese, Pollinator Swath, BWSR staff 19. Best Pollinator garden, Metro Blooms 20. Pocket Planting with Sign, Ali Boese 21. Volunteers, Metro Blooms 22. Pollinator Outreach, I & 2 Pollinator Friendly Alliance 23. Pocket Planing, Metro Blooms 24. Flowering Trees and Shrubs, Ali Boese 25. Flowering Trees and Shrubs, Ali Boese 26. PoilinatorSwath,BWSR staff 27. Pollinator Lawn, Ali Boese 28, no photos 29. Wild Lupine Prairie, Paul Erdmann 30. BWSR staff 31. Monarch Caterpillar, BWSR staff 32, Goldenrod and Bumble Bee, Rich Harrison 33. Swamp Milkweed and Beetle, Ali Boese Back cover collage, Ali Boese w" r33 .. _Wx S � Page: eft NATIVE PLANTS FOR POLLINATORS Findthesedownloadabie links on MN SWSR's Lawns to Legumes website. c SELECTED NON-NATIVE PLANTS FOR POLLINATORS XERCES GREAT LAKES POLLINATOR PLANT LIST i) QUESTIONS TO ASK YOUR NURSERY- POLLINATOR FRIENDLY ALLIANCE FACT SHEET WILD ONES - NATIVE PLANT NURSERIES ARID LANDSCAPE SERVICES gift W RENAISSANCE SOILS- MAKING A NEW GARDEN BED WITH MULCH G RENAISSANCE SOILS- MAKING A NEW GARDEN BED WITH COMPOST a) POLLINATOR FRIENDLY ALLIANCE - BEE LAWN FACT SHEET G BLUE THUMB -DIY BEE LAWN FACT SHEET a) BWSR POCKET GARDEN TEMPLATE - Boulevard, Sunny and Dry Soil 0) BWSR POCKET GARDEN TEMPLATE - Shade Garden, Moist to Dry BWSR POCKET GARDEN TEMPLATE - Rain Garden, Sunny, Moist Soil XERCES SOCIETY -NESTS FOR NATIVE BEES -FACT SHEET XERCES SOCIETY -ESTABLISHING POLLINATOR MEADOW FROM SEED -FACT SHEET M INSECTfQELI14 QqA BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR MN YARDS AND GARDENS MN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE h. l!r•i(IV Checkerspot butterfly Carpenter l bee Rusty patched bumblebee t Small Mining bee Bi -colored Sweat bee YOUR YARD CAN BEE THE CHANGE! Foraging ranges vary by size and species, plant a diversity of native plants to support small and specialist pollinator populations. GOALS, POLICIES AND STRATEGIES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THEMES The goals, policies and actions related to overarching themes of sustainability, community health or sense of place are identified by an icon with the implementation chart displayed later in the chapter. LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION The Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation Chapter presents the goals, policies, and strategies to achieve the land use vision. They are organized into six major topic areas discussed in further detail within Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan. • Growth and Change Complete Neighborhoods • Successful Commercial Centers and Corridors Revitalized Mixed -Use Downtown • Active Employment Centers • A Preserved Natural Environment Collectively these policies and strategies provide the guidance needed to achieve Monticello's land use vision and development character. They provide the foundation to protect and strengthen neighborhoods, foster a revitalized downtown and active employment centers, promote and protect the River, and conserve the open spaces and natural areas valued so highly by residents. Since these policies were prepared in tandem with those addressing mobility and connectivity, they ensure that economic centers, neighborhoods, and valued natural areas and open space will remain accessible and connected. MOBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY The Mobility & Connectivity Chapter presents the goals, policies, and strategies to implement the vision and complete the mobility network. For organizational purposes, the goals policies and strategies are divided amongst five topics described within Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan. • Planned Street Network • Complete Streets • New Interstate 94 Interchange • Downtown Transportation • Connectivity Exhibit 4.6 in Chapter 4 illustrates the strategies geographically. COMMUNITY CHARACTER, DESIGN AND THE ARTS Monticello will focus on its community design and arts goals related to the following topics discussed in further detail within Chapter 5 of the Comprehensive Plan. • Urban Design and Placemaking • Site Design and Architecture • Downtown Design • Design to Promote Economic Activity • Arts, Culture and Equity Source: Downtown Public Art, Source: City of Monticello 192 IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION CHART: LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION SHORT- I LONG- ONGOING THEME TERM TERM -!� IMPLEMENTATION Policy 1.4. Adequacy Strategy 1.4.1- Utilize collection of fees, of Infrastructure special assessments, developer -funded improvements, and other methodsensure Allow new development to occur that new development pays the cost of the O O only when the public facilities utility and capital improvement and service and utilities needed to serve needs it generates. development are available or will be financed by the development Strategy 1.4.2 -Update the City's trunk fee development through the payment of fees or analysis to align the costs of with the fees necessary to support development, and O funded improvements. to develop possible incentive options or tools to This includes demonstrating support desired development. that future tax revenues and/or development fees will support the Strategy 1.4.3 - Allow development in future life -cycle maintenance or the MOAA only when City serviced utility infrastructure is provided, the development replacement costs of meets the intent of the Joint MOAA, and the new Infrastructure. development is consistent with vision of the Comprehensive Plan. Strategy 1.4.4 - Update comprehensive utility plans for city and growth areas; incorporate into O annual capital improvement planning. Policy1.5: Sustainable Land Use Planing and Development Strategy 1.5.1- Incorporate sustainable design considerations throughout the developments planning and review process. Incorporate sustainability into land use planning decisions Strategy 1.5.2- Continue to include regulations and procedures to the greatest in the zoning code to permit and allow extent feasible. community gardens and small-scale urban O farming in residential neighborhoods and other appropriate locations. Strategy 1.5.3 - Continue to allow or conditionally allow residentially O scaled wind and solar renewable energy �s systems on private property as accessory uses. Strategy1.5.4- Utilize green infrastructure techniques, such bioswales, bioretention and biofiltration, to help manage stormwater in new and existing residential neighborhoods and non- residential development. -!� IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION CHART: LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION SHORT- I LONG- ONGOING THEME TERM TERM I I Policy 2.1. Neighborhood Strategy2.1.1- Adopt zoning regulations Diversity & Life -Cycle Housing • • that allow for a wider diversity of housing types, identify character defining features and O O • • • • • - • Sustain a diverse array of encourage a center of focus for • - - • • - neighborhood character and each neighborhood. • • • • . - housing types throughout . • • • • • - - • • • Monticello. These will range from • • - - • - . • estate residential to established Strategy2.1.2- Encourage opportunities for residents to stay in Monticello, with additional O �a - • - - • • - • • • • - • traditional neighborhoods, to options for estate residential, senior living, and • • . - • • • • • new planned subdivisions and other life -cycle options. Strategy2.1.3 - Amend zoning regulations as • • • . - - • • - conservation development, and • . - • - • • - - • • neighborhoods oriented around r or actiity rthat • .. •• • necessary to allow for small -lot single family homes, neo -traditional housing styles, cottage O • ' -•• • - • , , • The unique design elements homes, accessorydwellingunits (ADUs), and - • • . • • . • define each neighborhood should mansion style condos. . • • • • be protected and enhanced in the future including its housing stock, Strategy 2.1.4 - Encourage housing options which incorporate Universal Design to promote O (0) parks and public infrastructure. housing equity in choice. Strategy2.1.5 - Consider allowing Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). O Monticello's neighborhoods help define the city's form and sense of place. The city's neighborhoods will continue to evolve in the years ahead. In areas where the basic development pattern is already established continued reinvestment in the housing stock and infrastructure is encouraged with an emphasis on sustainable design in terms of private property improvement and investment, as well as capital improvements. In the outlying areas of the city where the development pattern is still evolving, new neighborhoods will be safe, healthy, attractive with a diverse population and housing stock. The planning objective for all Monticello residential areas is to make each neighborhood "complete" — with a variety of housing choices, proximity to neighborhood- scaled commercial services, community services, and neighborhood parks that serve as an identifiable center and gathering place for its neighbors and future residents. MONTICELLO 2040 COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODSCHAPTER MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN PUBLIC NUISANCES § 91.01 GENERAL POLICY. It is determined that the uses, structures, activities, and factors described with this subchapter, if allowed to exist, will tend to be harmful to the public welfare, safety, and morals. No person shall maintain or permit to be maintained any public nuisance identified within this subchapter on property in the city that is owned, leased, rented, occupied, or otherwise in the control of the person. (Prior Code, § 7-1-1) § 91.02 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this subchapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. Where terms are not defined this subchapter but are defined in the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) or elsewhere in the city code, the terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them as stated in those codes. PREMISES. Include any yard, lot, parcel, sidewalk, boulevard, street, highway, alley, park, playground, restaurant, cafe, church, school, any car or other motor vehicle, parking lot, drive-in, building used for business, commercial, or industrial purposes, washroom or lavatory, apartment hallway, or other location whether public or private in the city. PUBLIC NUISANCE. Whoever by act or failure to act does any of the following is guilty of maintaining aPUBLIC NUISANCE: (1) Annoy, injure, or endanger the safety, health, comfort, or repose of the public; (2) Offend public decency; (3) Unlawfully interfere with, obstruct, or tend to obstruct or render dangerous for passage, a lake, navigable river, bay, stream, basin, public park, square, street, alley, or highway; and (4) In any way render a considerable number of persons insecure in life or in use of property. (Prior Code, § 7-1-2) § 91.03 NUISANCES UNLAWFUL. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or association to maintain any public nuisance defined in this subchapter and it shall further be unlawful to do any act that is defined as a public nuisance in this subchapter. (Prior Code, § 7-1-3) Penalty, see § 91.99 § 91.04 PUBLIC NUISANCE. (A) Misdemeanors. The following nuisances are declared to be misdemeanors: (1) Unwholesome substance that is brought in, deposited, left, dumped, or allowed to accumulate within the city; (2) Junk vehicles: a JUNK VEHICLE is a vehicle without a valid current license, or without a valid current registration (if applicable), or which is apparently inoperable located outside an enclosed building in a residential area including, but not limited to, automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, snowmobiles, trailers, all -terrain vehicles, and watercraft; (3) Pest harborage: (a) All exterior property shall be free from rodent harborage and infestation; (b) Boxes, lumber, scrap metal, and similar materials shall not be allowed to accumulate outside a structure in a manner that attracts an infestation of pests; and (c) Materials permitted and approved for exterior storage shall be neatly stacked. (4) Garbage and rubbish: (a) All household garbage, offal, dead animals, animal and human waste, and waste materials; (b) Accumulations of litter, glass, scrap materials (such as wood, metal, paper, and plastics), junk, combustible materials, stagnant water, plastic bags, or trash; and (c) Accumulations of clothing and any other items not designed for outdoor storage. (5) Non -trash items; (a) Accumulations of wood pallets; (b) Accumulations of vehicle parts or tires; (c) All construction and building materials unless the materials are being used at the time in the construction of a building, in which case the construction must be permitted and on a continuous uninterrupted basis; (d) All appliance or appliance parts; (e) All indoor or upholstered furniture of a type of material which is deteriorated by exposure to outdoor elements; and (f) All other non -trash items which: 1. Are of a type or quantity inconsistent with the normal and usual use; 2. Are of a type or quantity inconsistent with then intended use of the property; or 3. Are likely to obstruct or impede the necessary passage of fire or other emergency personnel. (6) Fertilizer and burial of waste: (a) No person shall leave, deposit, or cause to be placed on any private ground any garbage; and (b) Sewage, waste, debris, carcass, or other substance or matter which is offensive or unhealthy by decomposition unless the same be buried at least three feet under the surface of the ground; provided, that the use of manure and phosphorous fee fertilizer in the normal course for agriculture or horticulture is permitted. (7) Engaging within the city in any trade or employment which is hurtful to the inhabitants or dangerous to the public health, or injurious to neighboring property, or from which obnoxious odors arise, or undue noise emanates, and specifically no person shall operate a dump or garbage dumping area or rendering plant except the specific activity be authorized by the issuance of a permit as hereinafter provided; (8) Causing or permitting garbage, tin cans, or refuse to be thrown or scattered upon any street, alley, highway, parkway, boulevard, or real estate; (9) Causing or permitting detached structures not requiring a building permit that do not conform to the following requirements: (a) All such detached structures shall be constructed of uniform building grade material; (b) All sides, roof, and floor shall be securely fastened to the interior frame of the detached structure; (c) All surfaces of the detached structures shall be stained, sealed, or painted; (d) Exterior metal surfaces shall be treated with materials designed to resist corrosion; (e) Structures that do not have slab floors shall have a rodent barrier that extends eight inches under the surface of the ground along the perimeter of the outside wall of the structure; (f) All the detached structures shall be permanently anchored to the ground; (g) Storage sheds erected after the adoption of the zoning ordinance shall meet district setback requirements; and (h) Detached structures shall be erected in the side or rear yard of any residence. (10) Consumption of beer, wine, or liquor in public except as provided by law; (11) Strewing, scattering, littering, throwing, or disposing of any garbage or refuse onto any premises except into receptacles provided for such purposes; (12) Marking with ink, paint, chalk, or other substance, or posting handbills on, or in any other manner defacing or injuring any public or private building or place within the city, or marking, defacing, or injuring fences, trees, lawns, or fixtures appurtenant to or located on the site of the buildings, or posting handbills on the fences, trees, or fixtures, or place a sign anywhere on any site except as permitted by the owner thereof; (13) Lingering about the doorway of any building, or sitting or lingering upon the steps, window sills, railing, fence, or parking area adjacent to any building in a manner as to obstruct or partially obstruct ingress to or egress from the building or in a manner to annoy the owner or occupant; (14) Obstructing pedestrian or vehicular traffic or otherwise causing an obstruction or interference with premises or rendering any premise dangerous for passage except in cases of emergency; (15) Failing or refusing to vacate or leave any premises after being requested or ordered, either orally, in writing, or by posted sign, to do so by the owner, agent, manager, or person in charge thereof, or by any law enforcement agent or official, and also the return at any time thereafter to any such premises after having been so requested or ordered to vacate or leave the premises; (16) Maintaining nuisance vegetation as follows: (a) In any area the existence of any noxious or poisonous vegetation such as poison ragweed or other poisonous plants, or any weed, grass, brush, or plants which are a fire hazard or otherwise detrimental to the health or appearance of the neighborhood; (b) In any area within 100 feet of the nearest building, the existence of weeds or grass in excess of eight inches in height or any accumulation of dead weeds, grass, or brush; or (c) In any area on an occupied lot, the existence of weeds or grass in excess of eight inches in height or any accumulation of dead weeds, grass, or brush. (17) All other conditions or things that are likely to cause injury to the person or property of anyone; and (18) Dense smoke, noxious fumes, gas, soot, or cinders in unreasonable quantities. (B) Petty misdemeanors. The following nuisances are declared to be petty misdemeanors: (1) Racing the motor of any motor vehicle so as to cause unnecessary and unreasonable noise; (2) Causing, producing, or creating any unnecessary and unreasonable notice by shouting, mechanical means, the blowing of motor vehicle horns, or any similar noise; (3) Improper or annoying use of spot lights onto persons or premises; (4) Using profane, abusive, indecent, or threatening language in public; and (5) Occupying a standing motor vehicle in an area generally reserved for parking or occupies a standing motor vehicle while the vehicle is double parked. (Prior Code, § 7-1-4) (Ord. 602, passed 10-13-2014) § 91.05 EXCEPTION. The provisions of this subchapter do not apply to the hauling or accumulation or spreading of manure for the purposes of agriculture provided the public health, safety, and welfare is not adversely affected thereby. (Prior Code, § 7-1-5) § 91.06 ABATEMENT. (A) Notice. Whenever the officer who is charged with enforcement determines that a public nuisance is being maintained or exists on premises in the city, the officer shall notify the owner and occupant of the premises of the fact and order that the nuisance be terminated and abated. The owner of the property will be determined as shown by the records of the office of the County Recorder. The notice shall be served in person or by regular mail. If the premises is not occupied and the owner is unknown, the notice may be served by posting it on the premises. The notice shall specify the steps to be taken to abate the nuisance and the time, not exceeding five business days for any grass or weed nuisance and not exceeding 20 days for all other nuisances, to either correct the violation or appeal to the City Council for a determination that the complained of activity does not violate the subchapter. (B) Accelerated abatement. For second or successive violations concerning grass, weeds, and other vegetation in a calendar year, the city will, without additional notice, correct the conditions creating the violations and assess the cost therefor against the property. (C) Recovery of cost. The owner of the premise on which a nuisance has been abated by the city shall be personally liable for the city's cost of abatement, including administrative costs. As soon as the work has been completed and the cost determined, the city shall prepare a bill for the cost and mail it to the owner. Thereupon, the amount shall be immediately due and payable to the city. (D) Assessment. If the nuisance is a public health or safety hazard on private property, the growth of weeds on private property or outside the traveled portion of streets, or unsound or insect -infected trees, the City Clerk shall, on or before September 1 next following abatement of the nuisance, list the total unpaid charges along with all other charges as well as other charges for current services to be assessed under M.S. § 429.101, as it may be amended from time to time, against each separate lot or parcel to which the charges are attributable. The City Council may then spread the charges against the property under that statute and other pertinent statutes for certification to the County Auditor and collection along with current taxes the following year or in annual installments, not exceeding ten, as the Council may determine in each case. (Prior Code, § 7-1-6) (Ord. 602, passed 10-13-2014) Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 3A. Tabled - Consideration of a Request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a 150 -unit Multi -Family Residential Building in the B-3, Highway Business District and Rezoning from B-3, Highway Business District to Great River PUD District. Applicant: Briggs Companies. Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Stephen Grittman, City Planner 10/03/202 Commission action): 10/23/2023 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Chief Building and Zoning Official, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Project Engineer ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of a Development Stage Planned Unit Development 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-26 recommending approval of a Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 1 of Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-26 for a Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 1 of Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-26 for additional information as directed by the Planning Commission. Decision 2: Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance creating the Great River Planned Unit Development (PUD) District and rezoning from B-3 to Great River (PUD) District for Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2nd Addition. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-27 recommending approval of a zoning ordinance amendment and rezoning from B-3, Highway Business to the Great River PUD District for Lot 1, Block 1 Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-27 for a zoning amendment and rezoned to Great River PUD District for Lot 1, Block 1 Great River 2nd Addition, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-27 for additional information as directed by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Outlot B, Great River Addition PID #: 155-226-000020 Planning Case Number: 2023-022 Request(s): Development Stage PUD, Rezoning from B-3, Highway Business to Planned Unit Development Deadline for Decision: October 21, 2023 (60 -day deadline) December 20, 2023 (120 -day deadline) Land Use Designation: Commercial and Residential Flex Zoning Designation: B-3, Highway Business District Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Attached Residential and Pond East: Vacant Commercial South: 1-94 West: Single -Family and Commercial Project Description: The applicant seeks approval of applications to allow a residential project totaling up to 150 multi -family units, with various parking facilities including a detached garage building sized to accommodate work vehicles and recreational equipment storage for residents. Approvals required include creation of and rezoning to a PUD District, and Development Stage PUD consideration for the project design and details. The project is planned to be constructed in two phases, with approximately two-thirds of the units constructed in the first phase within the easterly wing, along with the central common area. The westerly wing includes the remaining units and a series 2 Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 of tuck -under garage spaces. Both phases include underground parking on the lowest level below each building wing. ANALYSIS: Project Status. The applicant's original application included a subdivision component by Preliminary Plat of the subject property into a 6 -acre development parcel and a 14 -acre outlot retained by the current property owners. The application further included a request for PUD zoning and Development Stage PUD approval for the 6 -acre parcel. The latter zoning portions of the request required a significant amount of additional detail for recommendation on the Development Stage PUD. As such, the Planning Commission agreed to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat, but tabled action on the zoning requests. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat at its meeting on September 25, 2023, with the applicant acknowledging that the property continued to be zoned B-3, subject to further review and consideration of the PUD zoning. The PUD zoning portion of the project is again in front of the Planning Commission, with two motions under consideration: (1) Development Stage PUD, and (2) Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance establishing the Great River PUD Zoning District and rezoning the 6 -acre to PUD district. If approved, the applicant would then be required to submit a Final PUD request to the City Council, at which time the rezoning to PUD would be considered by Council. Background. The proposed project would be located on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Great River 2nd Addition, the farthest west 6 acres of the 20 acres owned by Riverwood Bank, between the north side of 1-94 and 7t" Street West. The project parcel has frontage on both 7t" Street West and Elm Street, as well as its exposure to 1-94. The current property is guided in the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan for mixed uses as "Commercial -Residential Flex", and is zoned B-3, Highway Business. At a prior Concept PUD review, City officials expressed general conceptual agreement with the use of this westerly portion for residential uses, preserving the bulk of the property for future commercial. There was some question about the timing of additional multi -family units within the community and recognition that the City would be completing an update to its 2020 Housing Report for additional context on demand. Inclusion of residential on this parcel would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's designation of the area for mixed use (Commercial and Residential Flex). To accomplish the proposed development, the applicant recently received plat approval, and now must obtain approval of an amendment to the zoning ordinance creating a PUD District Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 through rezoning of the parcel to that new district, and further obtain PUD project approvals. Following concept review, the next stage of review for PUD is the Development Stage approval. The proposed project varies somewhat from that proposed at the Concept Stage review, a common occurrence as additional design and engineering analysis is conducted for the project and the applicant seeks to address the feedback received during the Concept review. A significant component of the project's PUD proposal was the construction of a series of detached garages that would be rented to prospective tenants for use as storage or shop space, similar to that often available to single-family residents, but not to multi -family renters. In the concept drawings, two such structures were included in the parking field south and east of the principal structure. That has been changed to one building, with the other location now occupied by a green space for stormwater infiltration. Park Dedication. Park dedication is a requirement of platting for residential plats. The Park, Arts & Recreation Commission reviewed this item on September 21, 2023, and recommended a cash payment in lieu of land dedication. This recommendation is based on the proximity of the site to existing park facilities, including the Monticello Community Center. The pathway connections required by plat will support connectivity to these facilities. The park dedication requirement is applied at the time of zoning approval for the project as a residential development, pursuant to the terms of the Development Contract regulating the plat approvals. Land Use and Planned Unit Development Analysis. The plans propose approximately 100 residential units in the first phase, 150 units overall, increased from the initial application showing 137 units. The applicant proposes that a portion of the units will be income restricted, with the remaining unit count at market rates. All surface parking and other site work would be completed with the first phase of construction, along with a portion of the detached garage building. Covered parking associated with the westerly wing units, and a portion of the detached garage building are proposed to be constructed with the second phase. The project design shows 5 levels of housing, with 7 units at a "walk -out" grade facing the corner of 7t" and Elm Streets, which also are accessed via the underground garage level; 23 units on the main grade level accessible via the common area from the parking lot. This "first" floor includes 17 "tuck -under" garages in the westerly wing; then 40 units per each of the upper 3 floors (rather than the previous 35), a total of 150 units. The main level and upper three floors each include community room space and other common amenities. 4 Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 The bedroom count breakdown in the 150 units is as follows: 16 studio apts; 70 1BR apts; 43 2BR apts; 21 3BR apts; the total is 238 BR. For a six -acre parcel, the resulting density is 25 units per acre, within the expected density for multi -family development. The R-4 District, for comparative purposes, requires that the average unit size must be at least 800 square feet per unit. In this project, the average unit size is nearer to 900 square feet per unit, and many of the 1BR units are more than 800 square feet as shown. Parking: There are a variety of parking options on the project plans. Within the building, the lowest level includes 97 underground garage spaces, accessed via a garage entrance at the northwest corner of the building, from a driveway off of 7t" Street. Also in the main building, 18 "tuck -under" spaces are shown. These spaces are drive-in garages on the main parking level, also fronted by 18 open surface spaces; 1 of these 18 (both garage and open surface) is accessible. In addition to these spaces in the main building, the plan includes a detached garage building, shown with 30 individual bays of varying size, and described as having a variety of garage door widths and heights. As noted, the purpose of the spaces in this building is to accommodate tenants who desire to drive work vehicles home, or store larger vehicles and equipment not typically available to residents of multi -family projects. As with the "tuck -under" garages in the main building, these garage units each have a single parking space in the open surface lot outside of the garage door accesses. The site plan shows a total of 157 surface parking spaces (including those mentioned with the garage units above). In all, total parking available includes up to 311 parking spaces (covered and surface), plus an additional 14 parallel parking spaces at the south perimeter of the site. The applicant has indicated that the detached garage units will be used for passenger vehicle parking, as well as keeping of drive -home commercial vehicles, trailers, or even recreational vehicles, rather than typical tenant parking. As noted previously, several of these spaces in the area of the detached garage are available only as tandem spaces and would be dependent upon need to move vehicles that may be obstructing interior garage spaces. These would have to be tandem couplings of assigned spaces to specific renters to ensure access. As such, a parking management plan that assigns outdoor spaces would be necessary to ensure access to the tuck - under and garage parking areas. Counting all available parking (including the detached garage area) results in a parking ratio of approximately 1.3 spaces per bedroom, and 2.1 per unit. The parking supply should be adequate and exceeds the code minimum of 1.2 spaces per bedroom. The applicant has provided a parking assignment plan which illustrates the allocation of parking spaces by unit type and indicates 60 of the surface spaces would remain open and unassigned. This should accommodate variations in unit occupancy. Attention to the parking allocation as 5 Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 an ongoing management responsibility should ensure reasonable use of the parking supply without concern for overflow onto the adjacent streets. Finally, there are 3 parking spaces adjoining the access to the underground garage which would not appear to easily serve the tenants of the building and should be eliminated as parking. Building Architecture: The building design incorporates the bulk of each wing as a long flat wall with projecting metal balconies, and projecting wall articulations at the entry connecting the two wings, as well as at the end of each wing. The roof line is punctuated with small rises over the balcony locations, approximately 2 feet above the otherwise continuous flat roof line. Total height of the building from the public street perspective is approximately 52 feet for the five exposed levels, and approximately 42 feet from the interior of the site for the four exposed levels. These heights do not include the change in elevation along the parapets over the balcony areas. Roofline caps of some dimension and extension from the building would be recommended to add further interest to the fagade. One discrepancy along the front building roofline (facing the public street sides) is that the elevation drawings show a raised parapet over the balconies and corner projection, but the perspective sketches of that view does not include that parapet detail. It is presumed that the variation will be included in the final building plan, and a condition reflecting this detail is included in the staff's recommendation. The building materials are dominated by a combination of horizontal and vertical steel siding. Brick areas are shown surrounding main entrance, and at the lower residential level facing the northwest corner. Total percentages of the various materials are identified by the applicant's updated plans as follows: Principal Building: Detached Garage Building: 65% Onyx and White Steel Siding 21% Cedar Tone Steel Siding 14% Cultured Stone 38% Onyx and White Steel Siding 44% Cedar Tone Steel Siding 18% Cultured Stone It is noted that these percentages do not include doors, windows, or other glass exposures. Site Planning: The site plan is similar in layout to the Concept review plan, with access from both 7t" and Elm Streets, and a tiered building descending the grade from southeast to northwest. The project proposes a 40 -foot setback from the two public streets, while the comparable R-4 (Multi -Family Residential) District would require a 100 -foot setback. This is one aspect of the PUD flexibility sought by the applicant. Staff supports this design since it permits all of the parking to be screened from the streets by the building, leaving the street views of building and landscape only, without parking. The design places the building at the street -front, a more favorable design than parking -forward sites. Moreover, an aspect of the R-4 district 0 Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 requirements is a 40 -foot green space adjoining the street side of the building, with which this design complies. The site plan information would benefit by identifying the total amount of impervious surface, which appears to be significant. Engineering staff will be reviewing this aspect of the plan. Engineering will also review to ensure that regional ponding is adequate to address stormwater from the project. An extensive series of infiltration ponding is shown on the plan, which dominates much of the available green space. The plan includes a swimming pool and amenity area just along the south wall of the easterly wing. The site includes little other usable on-site green spaces, due to slopes (north and east) or infiltration areas as noted. The phasing plan of development for the amenity area indicates that these and other site amenities will be developed with the initial construction. This is a condition of approval for the PUD. The plans have been updated to show sidewalk routing within the project along the amenity area to the east, and extending out to 7th Street. In addition, sidewalk flanks the parking area along the southwest wall of the building. Because the westerly building wing includes the series of tuck -under garage doors and external parking spaces fronting each garage, there is no pedestrian circulation along this section. The plans also show sidewalk in the public right of way along Elm Street and pathway along 7th Street. The 7th Street pathway construction anticipates the removal of the existing boulevard trees. The staff recommendation is a 6' sidewalk rather than bituminous pathway. Landscape: The landscape plan has been updated to significantly increase tree plantings along the Elm Street frontage and especially along the 7th Street frontage. The 7th Street tree planting helps to mitigate the boulevard trees being lost to the pathway construction. The plan shows a variety of shrub and perennial plantings as foundation landscaping around the building, with turf lawn as the primary groundcover. The applicant should reconsider some of the material choices along the north wall of the building given that this area will receive little or no direct sun, and some of the plant selections could suffer in that location. Because of the significant amount of infiltration occupying green spaces along the west (Elm Street) boundary, the corner of Elm and 7th Street, the east (commercial property) boundary, and the internal parking area, landscaping may be affected by stormwater collection and occasional inundation. No details have been provided on the infiltration basin landscape. Ensuring that these areas are treated and maintained will be necessary. Along the east boundary, the site will abut land that continues to be planned and zoned for commercial uses. This boundary requires a "Type B" Buffer, with size and planting as follows: 7 Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 TYPE B —AESTHETIC BUFFER Option 1 (20 feet width) Option 2 (10 feet width) Plus fencing This perimeter buffer functions as an 8 ACI of canopy trees + 2 ACI of canopy trees + intermittent visual obstruction from the 10 ACI of understory 14 ACI of understory ground to a height of at least 20 feet, and trees + 15 small shrubs trees + 35 small shrubs creates the impression of special per 100 linear feet per 100 linear feet separation without eliminating visual contact between uses. The current separation is more than 20 feet in width and includes 36 ACI (18 trees at 2" caliper inches) over the 500 foot property line. The zoning ordinance for perimeter buffer requires that when development occurs adjoining undeveloped land, the requirement is to plant one-half of the buffer, with the remaining planting occurring on the adjoining parcel. As such, the standard requirement for this site would be 20 caliper inches of canopy trees and 25 caliper inches of understory trees (plus significant shrub planting). The plan includes only the overstory tree planting and should be supplemented significantly to meet the buffer standards. The other landscape comment relates to the south boundary adjoining the 1-94 frontage. The plan shows a very narrow grass strip along this boundary, and no additional plantings. MnDOT recommends berming or fencing in these areas to mitigate noise and negative visual impacts. The applicant is relying on the completed detached garage building as a principal shield from freeway impacts, as well as smaller berm areas in the southwest and southeast corners of the site. As freeway construction in this area is substantially complete for the foreseeable future, no noise wall is likely from MnDOT, since the residential development here is a new project. Berming would certainly help to buffer some visual impacts, although the limited space would restrict the ability to berm more than a few feet. Staff would recommend that the green space boundary in this area be maximized in width, and if no reasonable berm installed, planting a dense planting of the Black Hills Spruce and Blue Spruce used elsewhere on the site. These plantings should be spaced no more than 15 feet apart, to eventually grow into a reasonable visual screen. While landscaping has extremely limited value in noise reduction, the visual mitigation is still valuable, particularly since the berm and/or garage buildings will only screen the lowest portions of the main structure. Finally, staff would recommend additional ornamental plantings around the amenity areas, including those spaces adjacent to the pool, play, and pet run areas, with an emphasis on 0 Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 plantings between the amenities and units that face those common spaces. Plantings should be designed to screen and buffer the activity spaces from the adjoining private living spaces. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The updated plans include a significant level of additional detail and clarity over the prior PUD submission. The plans show a great degree of compatibility with the R-4 District and in many cases the site planning exceeds R-4 standards, subject to some additional enhancements, specifically including the landscape plan. As such, staff recommends approval of on Decisions 1 and 2 above for the Development Stage PUD and rezoning to PUD, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z. The proposed use of the site for residential purposes is consistent with the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan document guidance, which supports mixed use development on the property. The multi -family use also provides a transition between the commercial uses existing and expected to the east and the existing lower -density residential uses to the west and northwest. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-26, Development Stage PUD B. Resolution PC -2023-27, Rezoning to Great River PUD District C. Ordinance No. XXX D. Aerial Image E. Project Narrative F. Applicant Comment Response Letter, dated September 19, 2023 G. Civil Plan Set, Including: a. Removals and Tree Preservation Plan b. Phasing Plan c. Site Plan d. Dimension Plan e. Grading Plan f. Utility Plan g. Stormwater Management Plan h. SWPPP Narrative i. Erosion Control Plan j. Fire Truck Turn Radius Exhibit H. Stormwater Management Plan I. Stormwater Treatment Operation and Maintenance Plan J. Landscape Plan K. Architectural Renderings, Elevations & Floor Plans L. Building Materials Detail 0 Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 M. Tree Inventory N. Parking Management Plan 0. Site Lighting Information P. City Engineer's Letter, dated August 25, 2023 and September 28, 2023 Q. Department of Building Safety & Code Enforcement Comments R. MnDOT Comment Email, dated Z. Conditions of Approval 10 Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Briggs Monticello Suites Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2"d Addition Development Stage PUD, Zoning Amendment and Rezoning to Great River PUD District 1. The Development Stage PUD is conditioned on adoption of the Zoning District amendment and Rezoning to Great River PUD District. 2. Approval of the residential PUD and associated zoning amendments are subject to approval and execution of final development agreement, or amended development agreement. 3. Sidewalk and pathway facilities as recommended by the City Engineer's office are required right of way improvements and a requirement of the PUD and prior approved plat. Six-foot width sidewalks are required along the 7t" Street and Elm Street frontages of the development parcel. 4. The PUD is subject to Park Dedication requirements as recommended by the PARC and approved by the City Council. 5. Removal of the 3 parking spaces adjoining the garage entry and demonstrate adequate planting room adjacent to the south 14 parallel parking stalls. 6. Final building plans to include the raised parapet sections along all facades as shown in the building elevation drawings and roofline cap extensions to add dimension to the building exterior. 7. Exterior resident site amenities including the pool, pet run and playground area are be developed with the initial construction. 8. The landscape plans are revised to show additional plantings along the east boundary to comply with the buffer requirements as noted in this report. 9. The landscape and grading plans are revised to maximize the green space along the south boundary with 1-94, the berms added to the plan are retained, and evergreen tree plantings consistent with this report are added to the south boundary to create a visual buffer between the site and the freeway. 10. Additional landscaping is provided to enhance the amenity areas, as well as to screen the activity areas from the private living spaces of the adjoining units. 11. All landscape areas, including the berm and buffer plantings noted in this report, are irrigated to help ensure survival. 11 Planning Commission Agenda - 10/03/2023 12. The applicant continues to work with the City on final parking management and other details and incorporates additional comments into the Final PUD plans as required. 13. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 25, 2023 and September 28, 2023. 14. Comments of the Department of Building Safety & Code Enforcement as provided in their comments of September 27, 2023. 15. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. 16. Execution of an amended PUD agreement governing the proposed and remaining development in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. 12 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD FOR PROPERTY PROPOSED AS THE GREAT RIVER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREAT RIVER 2"D ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a multi -family residential project on the above captioned parcel in a PUD District, known as the Great River PUD District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat the property to accommodate said use; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to develop the property for residential multi -family uses, consistent with the economic development goals of the city for the described property; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for mixed uses as Commercial -Residential Flex in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently being considered for rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District which would control the uses and site development requirements on the property; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat and Development Stage PUD are consistent with the long- term use and development of the property for mixed uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 5, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting proposed buildings to uses and architecture which are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-26 The proposed improvements on the site under the PUD are consistent with the needs of the development in this location, guided and zoned for mix use, including the proposed multi -family development. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sanitary sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4. The improvements on the site facilitate appropriate development of the subject property, and are consistent with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project, including managed public street access, structured parking, modified setbacks, affordable residential development, and provision of options for storage of work vehicles are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, including its most recent Housing Study, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Development Stage PUD for the Great River Planned Unit Development, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. The Development Stage PUD is conditioned on adoption of the Zoning District amendment and Rezoning to Great River PUD District. 2. Approval of the residential PUD and associated zoning amendments are subject to approval and execution of final development agreement, or amended development agreement. 3. Sidewalk and pathway facilities as recommended by the City Engineer's office are required right of way improvements and a requirement of the PUD and prior approved plat. Six-foot width sidewalks are required along the 7t" Street and Elm Street frontages of the development parcel. 4. The PUD is subject to Park Dedication requirements as recommended by the PARC and approved by the City Council. 5. Removal of the 3 parking spaces adjoining the garage entry and demonstrate adequate planting room adjacent to the south 14 parallel parking stalls. 6. Final building plans to include the raised parapet sections along all facades as shown in the building elevation drawings and roofline cap extensions to add dimension to the building exterior. 7. Exterior resident site amenities including the pool, pet run and playground area are be developed with the initial construction. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-26 8. The landscape plans are revised to show additional plantings along the east boundary to comply with the buffer requirements as noted in this report. 9. The landscape and grading plans are revised to maximize the green space along the south boundary with 1-94, the berms added to the plan are retained, and evergreen tree plantings consistent with this report are added to the south boundary to create a visual buffer between the site and the freeway. 10. Additional landscaping is provided to enhance the amenity areas, as well as to screen the activity areas from the private living spaces of the adjoining units. 11. All landscape areas, including the berm and buffer plantings noted in this report, are irrigated to help ensure survival. 12. The applicant continues to work with the City on final parking management and other details and incorporates additional comments into the Final PUD plans as required. 13. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 25, 2023 and September 28, 2023. 14. Comments of the Department of Building Safety & Code Enforcement as provided in their comments of September 27, 2023. 15. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. 16. Execution of an amended PUD agreement governing the proposed and remaining development in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 1► [�7►�I[�1��1»_1►1►11�[et��l► lul[•Y•y[�1►1 MI - ATTEST: Paul Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE GREAT RIVER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO PUD, GREAT RIVER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREAT RIVER 2"D ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a multi -family residential project on the above captioned parcel in a PUD District, known as the Great River PUD District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat the property to accommodate said use; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to develop the property for residential multi -family uses, consistent with the economic development goals of the city for the described property; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for mixed uses as Commercial -Residential Flex in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently being considered for rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District which would control the uses and site development requirements on the property; and WHEREAS, the companion plat and Development Stage PUD are consistent with the long- term use and development of the property for mixed uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 5, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting proposed buildings to uses and architecture which are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-27 The proposed improvements on the site under the PUD are consistent with the needs of the development in this location, guided and zoned for mixed use, including the proposed multi -family development. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sanitary sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4. The improvements on the site facilitate appropriate development of the subject property, and are consistent with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan through its EDA and other agencies. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project, including managed public street access, structured parking, modified setbacks, affordable residential development, and provision of options for storage of work vehicles are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, including its most recent Housing Study, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Zoning Amendment and the rezoning of the subject property to PUD, Great River PUD District, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. The Development Stage PUD is conditioned on adoption of the Zoning District amendment and Rezoning to Great River PUD District. 2. Approval of the residential PUD and associated zoning amendments are subject to approval and execution of final development agreement, or amended development agreement. 3. Sidewalk and pathway facilities as recommended by the City Engineer's office are required right of way improvements and a requirement of the PUD and prior approved plat. Six-foot width sidewalks are required along the 7t" Street and Elm Street frontages of the development parcel. 4. The PUD is subject to Park Dedication requirements as recommended by the PARC and approved by the City Council. 5. Removal of the 3 parking spaces adjoining the garage entry and demonstrate adequate planting room adjacent to the south 14 parallel parking stalls. 6. Final building plans to include the raised parapet sections along all facades as shown in the building elevation drawings and roofline cap extensions to add dimension to the building exterior. 7. Exterior resident site amenities including the pool, pet run and playground area are be developed with the initial construction. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-27 8. The landscape plans are revised to show additional plantings along the east boundary to comply with the buffer requirements as noted in this report. 9. The landscape and grading plans are revised to maximize the green space along the south boundary with 1-94, the berms added to the plan are retained, and evergreen tree plantings consistent with this report are added to the south boundary to create a visual buffer between the site and the freeway. 10. Additional landscaping is provided to enhance the amenity areas, as well as to screen the activity areas from the private living spaces of the adjoining units. 11. All landscape areas, including the berm and buffer plantings noted in this report, are irrigated to help ensure survival. 12. The applicant continues to work with the City on final parking management and other details and incorporates additional comments into the Final PUD plans as required. 13. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 25, 2023 and September 28, 2023. 14. Comments of the Department of Building Safety & Code Enforcement as provided in their comments of September 27, 2023. 15. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. 16. Execution of an amended PUD agreement governing the proposed and remaining development in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 1► [�7►�I[�1��1»_1►1►11�[et��l► lul[•Y•y[�1►1 MI - ATTEST: Paul Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 153 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE GREAT RIVER PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO PUD, GREAT RIVER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREAT RIVER 2"D ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section §153.047 — Planned Unit Developments, is hereby amended by adding the following: (_xx_) Great River PUD District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Great River PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for multi -family residential land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Great River PUD District shall be multiple family residential uses on the subject property, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2023, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district shall be reviewed under the requirements of §153.028 (0) - Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to the various residential uses, as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. For the Great River PUD, storage and keeping of commercial vehicles, equipment, and related materials of residents of the district shall be an allowed accessory use within detached garage spaces as approved on the Final Stage PUD plans. No such storage or equipment shall be permitted within the principal residential structure. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Great River PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. (e) In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the R-4 Residential ORDINANCE NO. District shall apply. (f) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the §153.028(0)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B-3, Highway Business District to PUD, Great River Planned Unit Development District: Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2nd Addition Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this day of , 2023 ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, Administrator Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. AYES: NAYS: , I o 41- q 11 I. I I "$ Fl 94 - `dr�r _. 94 Monticello Residential Suites Development 1 Narrative 9-19-23 It is our goal is to provide a new 150 units, four story apartment project in two phases. Level 0 has 7 units, Level I has 33 units, level 2 has 40 units, level 3 has 40 units, level 4 has 30 units. The Exterior facade would include a combination of Horizontal & Vertical 5" EDCO Steel siding, Cultered Stone, Powder Coated Aluminum balconies throughout. All Trims including Garage doors, soffit, facia, to include Aluminum Wrap Accents. 162 + covered parking stalls in various options. Tuck Under/Detached & Underground with EV charging Stations. 46 of the 148 Detached Garages with a mix of cold and heated space. Including a garage door mix of IOx8HIOx12/1Ox14/12x12 /12xI4/16x10 Garages will be a mix of 20/24/48 ft in depth. All Garages will have openers & keyless entry & power. Proposed objectives are to Design, Construct and Manage 20% of Income Restricted and 80% of Market Rate Apartments in Monticello. To add an element of Superior and forward -thinking design based on the recent housing study zoom meeting & economic changes. In the Real estate space buyers today have half of the purchasing power than they did a year ago. Renters & Non - Renters in all levels of the lifecycle space want and need larger cold/heated garage space at their home. Space/Convenience/Affordability and time management in today's hectic demands are some of the reasons for the need of this project in Monticello. Proximity to highway 94, and local businesses who can service and maintain unsecured personal property such as boats/Snowmobiles/campers/recreational trucks & cars for this cliental is why this location is a viable option. It is also viable for many of our residents that work in the construction industry that need larger space to park their company vehicle & or trailer in covered indoor space. This location is also in alignment to help revitalize the downtown business. This location is within walking & Biking distances of downtown. Density in this region of Monticello will be the key to the local business success. These unique garage amenities within this housing community that can become available in 2025 is one of the reasons residents in Minnesota would choose Monticello. Retaining and providing current residents larger garage space needs and wants that are not being met will help accomplish Monticello's housing plan and will continue to see more pressure on the need/want for larger garages onsite where they live ... There is no rental housing options currently available in Monticello that offers this amenity. If we proceed now these options for the community will be available in 2025. Thank you for giving us this opportunity to work with and be a part of The City of Monticello Housing Efforts. Monticello Residential Suites Amenities 1. Community Room with kitchen, tables, furniture & Wi-Fi 2. Crafts & Exercise room 3. Elevator 4. 9 -foot ceilings on 1St floor 5. Stainless Steel Appliances 6. Designer Lighting 7. Controlled Entry 8. Surveillance throughout entire community 9. Onsite Management Office 10. Outside Patio 11. Outdoor Screen Porch with a patio 12. Indoor Parking. Attached & Detached 13. Business Flex Office 14. Yoga/Relaxation room 15. Youth development room 16. Movie Theater 17. Package room 18. Pet Spa 19. High Speed Internet Patrick Briggs TO: Hayden Stensgard & Matt Leonard, City of Monticello FROM: Patrick Briggs & Chris Dahn, Bogart, Pederson & Associates DATE: September 19, 2023 RE: Briggs Apartment Rezone/PUD/Preliminary/Final Plat/Civil Plans — Engineering 8-9-23 Memorandum//Staff & PC/CC review Delivery by Dropbox City Project No. 2023-22 WSB Project No. 022968-000 Thank You for reviewing the Briggs Apartment Site Development stage Site Plan/ Rezone/Cup/PUD/Planning Commission & Preliminary & Final Plat and Civil plans. Briggs & BPA has reviewed the comments from the city's preliminary plat review and the city engineer's review in the Planning Commission Agenda, dated 09/05/2023. We offer the following response to comments and recommendations that have been made in the review. Comments on the plan have been tabulated and responded to below. Exhibit Y Development Stage PUD Comments 1. Compliance with the conditions in Exhibit Z for approval of the Great River 2nd Addition preliminary plat. Response: Comment noted. 2. Clarify narrative, and match with plans for: a. Unit count b. Detached Garage Count c. Phasing Response: Comment noted, these items have been added to the civil plans. 3. Clarify description of building height, materials quantities, and provide additional articulation — both wall and parapet. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com • Response: The updated Architectural plan covers these items except for Material Quantities. This portion will be completed by the end of the day today. 4. Clarify management of parking areas and accessibility to tandem garage arrangements. Response: The Parking Plan request will be completed by the end of today 5. Supplement landscape plan significantly — particularly at perimeter of site — ornamental along 7th and Elm Streets; Response: The Updated Landscaping plan covers these items. 6. Provide significant ornamental and buffering landscaping and berming along 1-94 and east buffer boundary. Response: The Updated Landscaping plan covers these items. Including the parking structure 7. Address open stalls on east end of detached garage — Outdoor storage is not an allowed use in residential areas. Response: The open stalls have been removed and replaced with an expanded garage and lengthened parking stalls. 8. Address architecture and features of detached garage buildings — esp. materials and building/garage door height, etc. Response: The updated Architectural plan covers these items 9. Address internal pedestrian circulation. Response: Additional sidewalk and trails are now provided. More information provided below. 10. Address connections to public trail/sidewalk system. Response: Additional sidewalk and trails are now provided. More information provided below. 11. Provide information on unit sizes, and other issues related to City requirements. BPA Response: The updated Architectural plan covers these items 12. The residential PUD is subject to Park Dedication requirements as recommended by the PARC and approved by the City Council. Response: Comment noted. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com 13. Comments and requirements of the City Council related to final plans, and any changes or amendments the Council may require. Response: Comment noted. 14. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 31 st, 2023. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. Execution of amendment to the development agreement incorporating the PUD and governing the PUD in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. Response: Comment noted, See comments/responses below. 15. Execution of an amended PUD agreement governing the proposed and remaining development in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. Response: Comment noted. Conditions of Approval for Preliminary Plat 1. The Zoning Amendment establishing the PUD District, Rezoning of the Subject Property, and Development Stage PUD are tabled until additional plan information can be submitted and reviewed. Response: Comment noted. 2. Approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat are conditioned on agreement to prohibit development of the proposed residential PUD until PUD plans have been submitted and approved by the City, subject to final development agreement and all other requirements and a requirement that the plat shall be developed in accordance with the applicable zoning in effect at the time of development. Response: Comment noted. 3. Sidewalk and/or pathway facilities along Lot 1, Block 1 of the proposed plat as recommended by the City Engineer's office are required right of way improvements and shall be installed by the developer as a requirement of the plat. Response: Additional sidewalk and trails are now provided. More information provided below. 4. Approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat are conditioned on verification by the City Engineer that the existing right of way for both 7th Street and Elm Street will accommodate the installation of pedestrian path and/or sidewalk facilities by the development as required right-of-way improvements. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com Response: Additional sidewalk and trails are now provided. More information provided below. 5. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer in the letter dated August 31st, 2023, as well as comments provided on the civils plans. Response: Comment noted, See comments/responses below. 6. Comments and recommendations of other staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing. Response: Comment noted. 7. Execution of a development agreement governing the plat in accordance with the standard requirements and the additional recommendations noted in this report. Response: Comment noted. City Engineering Comments Preliminary/Final Plat & General Comments 1. City staff and Fire Marshall will provide comments under separate cover. Response: Comment noted, Additional fire truck turning information is provided. 2. With final plat submittal, provide a sheet with hatching for differing pavement types (streets, concrete walk, bituminous trails, etc.). Provide signing and striping sheet(s). Response: Additional hatching and pavement information is now provided. 3. The building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements. Response: A fire department exhibit including the hydrant locations and turning movement of a firetruck is now included in the plans. 4. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments on the plans have been summarized in this review letter. Response: Comment noted, These have been updated as well. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com Existina Conditions & Demolition Plans (Sheet C1 5. The existing site and demolition plans will also need to include existing utility locations, pipe sizes, pipe material types, structure rim/invert elevations, etc. Response: The existing conditions referenced for the civil design now includes the utility information in the plan. The preliminary plat includes the rim and invert information in a table. 6. Add more items to the legend including the linetypes for the various elements on the plans such as property lines, easement lines, setback lines, property corners, utility linetypes, etc. Response: The legend for existing elements is now included in the removals plan. 7. Show a 2' strip of bituminous replacement adjacent to curb removals/replacement. Response: There is now a 2' strip of replaced asphalt called out. 8. Show more contour labels for the areas south of the lot. Response: Additional contour labels are now shown for reference. Site Plan (Sheet C2) 9. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures and required turnaround space as required by the Fire Marshall. Fire truck circulation will also need to accommodate the City's ladder truck. Response: A turning movement for a ladder truck is now included in the plans. There are no concerns. 10. Provide a pedestrian path along Elm Street and 7th Street adjacent to the development site. Also a pedestrian path is to be installed along the south side of 7th Street to or at a minimum, a connection to the adjacent existing sidewalks should be provided. Response: These 2 pedestrian paths are now included with more sidewalk in the site for circulation. 11. Show any proposed signage and lighting units on site plan. Add stop signs at the exit points of the site. Response: Stop signs, light pole locations, and ADA signs are now included. 12. Turn off existing contouring on site plan for clarity. Response: These contours are no longer visible on the site plans. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com 13. Confirm whether or not there will be a monument sign and show location on plan. Response: A monument sign is proposed at the north corner of the lot. The location has changed and is outside of the easement. 14. Provide additional dimensioning examples of parking spaces. It appears there are at least two size variations proposed. Response: Additional information is now provided for the parking spaces. Parallel parking is now also provided. 15. Provide more specific hatching in the legend for the various pavement types (i.e. 4" versus 6" concrete, standard versus heavy duty bituminous pavement, etc.) Response: Additional information and hatching variations are now included. Sidewalk/concrete has 2 depths, all bituminous pavement will have the same thickness. Grading & Drainage Plan (Sheet C3) 16. Label more of the proposed contours and the location of all EOF's. Locations of EOF's or other concentrated discharge point over vegetated areas will require a permanent energy dissipation/stabilization method such as rip -rap or permanent turf reinforcement matting. Response: The proposed contours are now more detailed. EOFS of all low points are now shown. Flexamat block is now utilized at the western swale. 17. Within handicapped accessible spaces or routes within the parking areas, the grade cannot exceed 2.0%. Provide more grading detail, spot elevations, or note(s) to reinforce this requirement. Response: ADA areas have looked at further and more detailed is shown along the accessible routes. Of note, the north corner within the pedestrian ramp has a flowline slope between 4 and 8% due to the steepness of the road, this will be further looked at for the next submittal. 18. With final construction plans, provide more spot elevations along curb lines, requisite with what would be required for a surveyor to provide construction staking. Response: More spot elevations and slopes are present on the grading plan for additional detail. 19. Include additional drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runoff within vegetated areas. Response: Additional slope arrows are now provided. 20. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com Response: Sizes of proposed structures are now included. They are all able to be 48". Casting information is now also included. Utility Plan (Sheets C4) 21. Show more clearly (with thicker lines) where the water/sewer service extensions are located on the plan; currently, they are difficult to distinguish from the existing linework. Response: Thicker lines are now used for the utility lines and the contours lightened. 22. It is not clear what the existing valve configuration and hydrant location is with the existing water service, review and correct the plans. Response: This orientation has been updated and matches with the as -built plans. 23. Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will be required to apply for a permit from DLI, provide copies to the City. Response: Comment noted. This will be provided. 24. Hydrant locations shall be reviewed and approved of by the City Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250' overlapping influence radius (maximum 400' spacing) is required along roadway (hose length). Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. Response: This is now shown in the fire department exhibit. An additional hydrant is now included within the site. 25. The watermain connections to the building shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV on the plan (if required). Response: Comment noted. The location of the PIV is now indicated on the plans. 26. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet. Response: Dimensions have been added, the services are approximately 17 feet apart. The new crossing water main is now shown as well. 27. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of: a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5'. e. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details. f. The City will require televising for sanitary and storm sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the City for review. Response: These notes have been added to the utility plans. Stormwater Management & Modelling (Sheet C5) 28. Provide the hydroCAD calculations with the final submittal to verify drainage areas, impervious and treatment capacity. Response: Hydrocad calculations have been made and should be included in the submittal. Please contact BPA if it wasn't provided/recieved. The peak elevations and other information are shown in the storm water management plan. 29. This site was designed to drain to the regional stormwater pond on the north side of 7th St. The pond will provide rate control for the site based on a curve number of 89. Complete, the site is shown to have a curve of 89 meeting requirements. Response: Comment noted. The combined CN is still below 89. 30. Sheet 5C references web soil survey for soils information, please Include soil borings to verify soil types and infiltration rates for the site along with separation from the ground water. Soils borings should be a minimum of 5' below the bottom of the proposed infiltration basins. Response: Currently, soil borings have not been completed but are scheduled. Please consider approval of plan being contingent on receiving soil borings that are consistent with the current design assumptions. 31. The new site will need to provide onsite volume control for runoff of 1.1" over the new impervious area, Pre-treatment measures are required prior to discharging to the volume control BMPs. a. Verification of soil infiltration rates is required. b. When designing an infiltration practice for volume control and water quality management, on-site testing and detailed analysis are strongly encouraged in order to determine the infiltration rates of the proposed infiltration facility. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com Documented site-specific infiltration or hydraulic conductivity measurements (double -ring infiltrometer) completed by a licensed soil scientist or engineer is required. Response: Comment noted, the stormwater management plan has been updated to have a double ring infiltrometer test be completed after the basins have been final graded. 32. An operation and maintenance plan for all stormwater BMPs is required and should be submitted with the stormwater report for review. Response: This is now included. 33. The site is outside of the DWSMA and is not subject to requirements of the City's Wellhead Protection Plan. Response: Comment noted. 34. Pretreatment, in the form of ponds, forebays, filter strips, or other approved methods, shall be provided for all infiltration areas. Currently rain guardian turrets are shown. Additional pretreatment will be required for the central infiltration basin to prevent maintenance issues in the future. CBMH 2 and 7 should be 4 foot sumps per City standards. Response: New sumps and forebays are proposed around the site. A pretreatment measure is present on all inlets unless it is discharge from an upstream infiltration basin. A forebay for all the rain turrets is now proposed on the central and west basin. 35. Provide a stabilized EOF route for the central infiltration basin. a. Emergency Overflows (EOFs) shall be sized with a minimum bottom width of five feet and 4:1 side slopes. Label all EOF locations on the plans. b. The maximum flow depth in EOFs shall be less than equal to one foot as calculated for a 100 -year back-to-back storm event. c. At least two feet of vertical separation is required from an area's emergency overflow elevation to the lowest opening of a building. Current plans show garage FFE of 960 and an EOF elevation of 958. Response: These requirements have been incorporated into the design for the emergency overflows of the basins. The garage elevation has been raised half a foot. 36. For basins with a suitable outlet, freeboard will be two -feet above the HWL determined by modeling the 100 -year critical event. Verify HWL have a minimum of 2' from all structures. Response: The basins are now modeled in HydroCAD. All buildings are at least 2' higher than the 100 -year peak elevation. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com Erosion Control & SWPPP Plans (Sheets C6 & C7 37. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future full plan set submittals. In progress, a more detailed review of erosion/sediment control and SWPPP will be conducted with future submittals. Response: Comment noted. 38. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review (if required due to disturbance limits), prior to construction commencing. Response: An NPDES permit is required and will be provided prior to any construction on site. 39. Label redundant perimeter control around the stormwater treatment areas. Silt fence should be double layered to a 3 foot minimum separation and 5 foot maximum separation. Show a row of silt fence or bio -roll at the bottom of the slope around the perimeter of the infiltration areas. Response: Redundant perimeter controls have been added around the infiltration basins. Due to the small bottoms of the basins, it is not feasible to put additional BMPs at the bottoms of the smaller basins. The largest west basin does incorporate the additional BMPs. Additional erosion and sediment control measures have been added throughout the site. 40. Change line type or color on erosion control plan show erosion control BMP's clearly show up. Currently they blend into the contour lines. Response: The colors of the erosion control have been changed to be more clear on the plans. Proposed contours lines have been lightened. 41. Erosion control blanket is required for slopes 4:1 or greater. Response: Erosion control blanket is now proposed in areas with 5:1 and greater slopes. Construction Notes & Standard Details Plans (Sheets C8 & C9) 42. The pavement design/typical section shall be designed to meet the City's standard, at minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site and may need to include a thicker aggregate section and/or a sand section here the fire truck access route is intended. Provide details for the various pavement sections. Response: A geotechnical report is unavailable currently. The final pavement section will be determined through this report. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com 43. Provide details for the proposed stormwater treatment areas. A 4" layer of basic "topsoil" is not typically recommended with infiltration basins, reference the MN Stormwater Manual for preferred soil types and specifications. Response: This detail has been updated to be in line with the MPCA example and more information on notes is provided. 44. Provide specific details for each of the control structures proposed. Response: All control structures are standard storm manholes. The only change from the detail is the HAALA pond skimmer grate which is called out in the utility plan. If a change is needed, please note. 45. Some details appear to be very light in color and may be difficult to read on printed hard copy, please review. Response: This has been revised. 46. Use City details in all cases where practicable. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal. Response: City details are now included for all relevant details. Traffic & Access 47. Five spaces must be dedicated as Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant in the indoor heated lot to meets the required amount for lots with a total of 101-150 parking spaces. Four spaces must be dedicated as ADA compliant in the outdoor lot to meet the required amount with a total of 76-100 parking spaces. Accessible parking spaces and aisles must meet all ADA requirements. Response: 4 spaces are now proposed outside. Additional ADA stalls are present within the building. 48. The site would generate approximately 227 daily trips, 19 AM peak hour trips and 20 PM peak hour trips. The existing Average Daily Traffic on 7th Street is 5300 and on Elm Street is 1550. The addition of the proposed traffic should not have an impact on roadway capacity or operations. Response: Comment noted. 49. Provide a pedestrian path along Elm Street and 7th Street adjacent to the development site. Also, to provide connectivity, a pedestrian path is to be installed along the south side of 7th Street to or at a minimum, a connection to the adjacent existing sidewalks should be provided. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com Response: These sidewalk and trail connections are now proposed. 50. Provide a sight line exhibit at 7th Street access and show that intersection/driveway sight distances will be met. Response: A 30' sight triangle is now included in the site plan. No sight obstructions are included in this area. Wetlands & Buffers 51. A wetland delineation should be completed and submitted to the Local Government Unit (the City of Monticello) for review and approval. There is a mapped National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetland at the east side of the parcel. Response: This has been investigated through the wetland report conducted by John Anderson. No wetland areas are present on the proposed site or the lot. 52. If wetland impacts are proposed, a replacement plan must be submitted to the City of Monticello for Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) review. Response: No impacts to wetlands are proposed. 53. The City has wetland buffer and setback rules that are based on the functional quality of the wetlands. If wetlands are identified on site, wetland buffers and setbacks will be required. Response: See above. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (763) 262-8822. Thank you for providing review comments for this project. Sincerely, Briggs Companies Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. Christopher J. Dahn, P.E. Bogart, Pederson & Assoc Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Fax:763-262-8844 Becker, MN 55308 Toll free: 888/210-8301 www.bogart-pederson.com MONTICELLO RESIDENTIAL SUITES CIVIL & SURVEY PLANS PREPARED BY: Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0 - U Fairhaven s .t South Haven ' f ss - M,apie LakF SS Frencr'_= Buffalo ass Knapp ?J kvdhIand Cakato ,_ Nlaverty ,�. Montrnse Stackhdm Rice -Lake z ao W in step :a BRIGGS COMPANIES ELM STREET & 7TH STREET WEST CITI(OF14ONTICELL0I WRIGHTCOUNT( Bc}LaF:e - Bailer r;b� EIF. River z Gtsego oaytnr. - -ville ra .. ss Greenfe,d Reckfaro aF;�Rc.O�ca ;Ec�r�;H Loreto Delano Mec : i Independence •--t ?dna' � �- – Maple P'airi .............................. 9 Watertown Long Gror�a - WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA DEVELOPMENT STAGE APPLICATION 09/26/2023 PROJECT LOCATION lk� I hisk r- ,MN - t. DATE Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title CO Cover C1 Removals and Tree Preservation C2 Phasing Plan C3 Site Plan C4 Dimension Plan C5 Overall Grading Plan C6 Grading Plan C7 Utility Plan Cg Stormwater Management Plan C9 Erosion Control Plan C10 SWPPP Narrative C11 Site Details C12 Site Details C13 City Details C14 City Details C15 City Details C16 City Details C17 Fire Department Exhibit ^Ok O _ - UJI Z - y� Z VICINITY MAP REV NO. DATE DESCRIPTION - 08/16/2023 DRAWINGS ISSUED TO CITY 1 09/19/2023 REVISED PER CITY REVIEW 2 09/26/2023 SOUTH BERM REVISIONS PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ARE QUALITY LEVEL D. QUALITY LEVEL D PROVIDES THE MOST BASIC LEVEL OF INFORMATION. IT INVOLVES COLLECTING DATA FROM EXISTING UTILITY RECORDS. RECORDS MAY INCLUDE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS, DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICES MAPS, EXISTING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DATABASES, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, ETC. IT � O 943.33 \ K �- S s � � • FES 36" CMP S - S R'm=945.34 Elev.- 932.55 S \ N 5/ \� RimInv.= 933. l27 S - Rim- 6.9/ - c5` \� \ � S Inv -9 / \ic Rim =942.66 S \ \\ Rim=943. 17 8" S im 45. 4 - \ 36„ \ Inv.=932.86 W I S Ver ) \ Rim=943.62 S+ / W Inv.=934.20 E Inv.=934.20 \S lnv.=939.47 vNu•( IQ 8" PVC SDR 35 Sani. \ 9 9sz \ * \ Rim S h location of trail Inv.=942.57 V � Rough 9 \ �9 �9 Rim=946.34 5 � 9Q Inv.=935.52 _ AUL REMO ALL TREES T H WA R PROPOSED P H. \ v �� \� `s 30" RCP -�� S -Rlm=949.05 IQ =773 \ 9s 9� Baa Rim=948.1 9 Qn S Inv. -933.799 T Rim=950.44 / S MAINTAIN & PROTECT HYDRANT & VALVES_945.98 v - n. 5 = 4 W lug Inv.=945. \ 12 52 --�-_- -- -__ 80' CURB CUT & 2' WIDE ASPHALT SAW -CUT & REMOVAL S S - 30" RCP / SBL \ FES l8" CMP �/ // / / � El ev.• 958.62 SSL \ / \ SBL / 60 S 4P Fmi 0/-V CP \ / / AP 83' LONG, 2' WIDE ASPHALT SAW -CUT & REMOVAL 'K / TNH Elev.• 96/.341 / Alp \ \ -%t / \ \9 19 19 AP 19 \ 9S9 \ \ \ MAINTAIN MNDOT FENCE \ \9S S� Sat Sec Set / 9S6' a 0 N LEGEND: N REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION (AS INDICATED). Z O w REMOVE EXISTING TREES AS INDICATED ~ v z 0 40' 0 Z v � X REMOVE FEATURE (AS INDICATED) U) w 2 U) W W SCALE: 1" = 40' Z o m SALVAGE (AS INDICATED) O < w O o 0� U) SAW -CUT EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND: Q Cl) N 0 Cl) N 0 Cl) N 0 ® Denotes catch basin 0 m rn N ❑E Denotes electrical cabinet o 0 0 ® Denotes water service ® Denotes fiber optic marker ZZ N Denotes sanitary manhole M g g 0 z o ►� Denotes watervalve Denotes sign N U Denotes power pole J 0 o E-- Denotes guy wire 0 Lu o N ❑T Denotes telephone pedestal ® Denotes fiber optic vault m Denotes hydrant m m 0 LU O Denotes beehive catchbasin z Y � O B Denotes bollard U LU Denotes P light ole 9 0 0 0 U 0 LLL 110- Denotes flared end section Denotes culvert U 00 LS 16321 Denotes David Thorp, LS 16 LS 13637 Denotes Paul Thorp, LS 0 a� LLC) LS 44606 Denotes Kyle Klasen, LS E � LS 15233 Denotes Dennis Taylor, LS x,03 � N 0 z Denotes bituminous surface C U) -0 \RC1 O L J 0 Denotes concrete surface N a E cv _0cv E L O Q Denotes gravel surface +J O o T Q ( t ��- Denotes wood fence �EQ c U M S Denotes chainlink fence 0 0 - - Denotes overhead electric U) p - - - - - - Denotes easement '2 a) C Denotes major contour 0) M U) 0 Denotes minor contour Denotes sanitary sewer - Denotes storm sewer Denotes waterline Z N Denotes existing adjoiners O V - SBL - Denotes building setback line Z o Denotes building setback line w/ LO LL L v W C Z °° N Q � wN DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES: W W L r Q U W.. 1. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM OR COORDINATE ALL V > co X O U wu- UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS FROM EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS TO THE (9 Z _J W N PROPOSED BUILDING, AS WELL AS TO ALL ON-SITE AMENITIES. THESE CONNECTIONS O Z W Q of NW INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SANITARY SEWER, UNDERGROUND GAS, Q U) wwz U) 0.0 > Z W I_ ETC. D z z � 'CO, O 2. THE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL O 0 � � CDF_ STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY CONNECTIONS 06 mQ Z-% S / \ \ R in=944 5 N�lnv.=94/.5/ v / \ Rim=46.9/ \ /7935.4/4. \ s / / s, \ 8" Soni. Rim O.Z. NE lnv.=94/. Inv. Stub (Veri1 WM O / � SBL s \ \ FES 18" CMP / Dew 958.62 � / 8" CMP \ ❑M / 959.0/ `\ / o / a 0 N / LEGEND: N S - F------, � FES 36" CMP s PHASE 1F PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT O H Elev.• 932.55 S L ------J U w Z \ Rim=942.27 a O W O \Inv.=93312 V) Rim --942.66 IL - - - - - - J PHASE 2 PROPOSED PET / PLAY AREA > \ 0 40' 0 U) v 0� cn L g U) LU LU \ \ Rim=943/7O p _ M v. 36„ \ \ In=932.86 °a SCALE: 1i� 40 w PROPOSED 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK L Rim=94362 0 W lnv.=934.20 � 0 � O \ E Inv.= 934.20 D67F S Inv=939.47 PROPOSED 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT \. , a 8" PVC SDR 35 Soni. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612 Rim= CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - D412 � env.=942.57 Rough location of trait _ PROPOSED SIGN ` PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - Rim=949.05 1,V.=937.73 30"RCP SITE PLAN NOTES: Rim=950.44 1. PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING DIMENSIONS AND AISLE WIDTHS ARE SHOWN TO FACE OF CURB. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO BACK OF CURB. 2. ALL CONCRETE RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS. 6. SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 7. LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED TO RECEIVE A CERTAIN SEED MIX SHALL BE MIXED WITH SEED MIX 25-131. 9. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: LOT'E' SITE AREA +6.00 ACRES CONCEPT'E1' -APARTMENT DWELLING UNITS PROPOSED -(5) LEVEL 150 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDINGS -UNIT COUNT LAND AREA=150 / 6.0=25.0 UNITS PER ACRE • 99 INDOOR PARKING STALLS +(17) TUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS=116 • DETACHED GARAGE STALLS=46 • TOTAL INDOOR PARKING STALLS=162 -INDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=162 /150=1.08 • OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS=184 -OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=184 /150=1.22 -OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS PER BEDROOM=184 / 235=0.78 • TOTAL PARKING STALLS=346 -TOTAL PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=346 /150=2.31 -TOTAL PARKING STALLS PER BEDROOM=346 / 235=1.47 Oof i Hd N U Qo ED LO N O N i U o ° m L 0 7v E 14 m \� a°i�J V CL >' L� (n O (� E E -O ac D >' m 2 O L Q t m c o "g N U) o rsla)_�O�coU)0-U 0 zN O v N M rn m m U) z C) 0 - m 0 Uj ao N Q LU z z Y - O c� U z-_ w� z w mQ Hw O 0Q W 0Z 2 > J 0 0 0 0 0 E_ i U o ° m L 0 7v E 14 m \� a°i�J V CL >' L� (n O (� E E -O ac D >' m 2 O L Q t m c o "g N U) o rsla)_�O�coU)0-U 0 zN O v N M rn -PAVEMENT 117,009 S.F. U) z C) 0 - -BUILDING 53,115 S.F LO L0O lfj � W CI)Z ao N Q LU 0�O N WH WY� a Q U z-_ w� .. - w mQ Hw O "ZJ Z�Q w N Q'N WLwLZ U)op ~N rQ1'� /c/p� V♦ >Zw ?ZZ OM V Li o O0 �J� O~ MryJ� _j Z>> QUw OJ W �V �H IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS -PAVEMENT 117,009 S.F. -BUILDING 53,115 S.F -GRASS 91,035 S.F. -TOTAL 261,159 S.F. LU z % IMPERVIOUS 65.1% UNITS FOR REFERENCE ONLY (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURAL) UNIT MIX PER BUILDING J (n � (LEVEL 0) 7 UNITS 7 BEDROOMS W (LEVEL 1) 33 UNITS 2) 40 UNITS 45 BEDROOMS 57 BEDROOMS _ Z O U (LEVEL z (LEVEL 3) 40 UNITS 79 BEDROOMS Q 4 - (LEVEL 4) 30 UNITS 47 BEDROOMS w (TOTAL) 150 UNITS 235 BEDROOMS z LU U o � 00 U 2 0 CL J O LU U m O z O U SHEET NO. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 C2 IT S ,UL K - -_ s S s FES 36" CMP - `s R/'m=945.34 % \ ev S - \ NAInv Rim=942.27 - / \Inv.=933.12 S \ Rim PED. RAMP W/ TRUNCATED DOMES /7935.41 / / / Rim --942.66 / 4.4 S \ S \ \\ Rim=943.17 / MONUMENT SIGN ? _ Inv.=932.86 Rim . \ 36" \ NE lnv.=94/. v. Stub (Verify) Rim=943.62 NORTH INFILTRATION BASIN S / \ W Inv.=934.20 E Inv.= 9J4.20 D67F WM - SInv=939.47 BOULDER RETAINING WALL �\ \ � • • / � � (SEE GRADING PLAN) 8" PVC SDR 35 Soni. \ �\ CPSBLQ Rim= Inv.=942.57 Rough location of trail Rim=946.34 _ O / ' / \ \ \s\� \ Inv.=935.52 / AUL / / R1m=94324\ \ J` S / N Inv.=939.72 \ 30" RCP - Rim=949.05 / / y PATIO PADS/ C lnv.=937.73 PATIO PADS \ _ \ \ � Rim=948.16 30" RCP Rim -9 5 /�` \ 10' WIDE ASPHALT PATH ��=�= l Inv. -93379 &I / Inv.=93324 \ \ \ It PED. RAMP W/ TRUNCATED DOMES 80 LF OF 2' WIDE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT - B" P �26 SITE ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED APARTMENT / Stu Inv. �ry _ ` N -939.8 / (150 UNITS TOTAL) � S /n v. Stub-- 39J6_ I " DIP CL 52 I / BIKE RACK T H l8 \ w/ 8" plug SeL I2" DIP CL 52 WM - - - / ELECTRICAL BIKE RENTAL AREA GATE 10' WIDE ASPHALT PATH \ / CHANGING ROOM, SHOWER, & BATHROOM BUILDING \ TRASH ENCLOSURE AREA / SBL \ \ / 30' SIGHT TRIANGLE \ FES 18" CMP // / Q i \ Elev. 958.62 / % b a 4 LOCKER LOCATION RETAINING WALL SBL T \BL BL STOP SIGN \ / \ WEST INFILTRATION BASIN / a%• S � // / / \ \ / 6' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 0 0 / / PED. RAMP W/ TRUNCATED DOMES B � BOLLARDS O o� 0 o POOL / SPLASH PARK LOCATION / o 8" CMP - \ ❑M / / o ADA PARKING SIGNS 959.0/ `\/ / // � &RAMP (TYP.) BOULDER RETAINING WALL D412 CURB & GUTTER & \*' // (SEE GRADING PLAN) MOTORCYCLE PARKING a C a / EDGE OF PHASE 1 & 2 3' CURB CUT Cit, GATE 0 0 6' HIGH ORNAMENTAL FENCE B612 CURB &GUTTER \ 83' LF OF 2' WIDE // y ASPHALT REPLACEMENT / SITE ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL) 17 / 4' HIGH BLACK CHAIN LINK FENCE o 4/ STOP SIGN � © _ PET AREA W/ PEA GRAVEL STAIRS (SEE GRADING PLAN) / PLAY AREA LIGHT POLE LOCATION a• D412 CURB & GUTTER & / 6" CONC. PAVEMENT' MOTORCYCLE PARKING B612 CURB & GUTTER / d / 4' HIGH BLACK CHAIN LINK FENCE T H El e v: _ � K / PET AREA W/ PEA GRN\ EL POLE LOCATION RAIN TURRET d ` CENTRAL INFILTRATION BASIN \ \ S64 2 B612 CURB & GUTTER \ \ ' 4HIGH BLACK CHAIN LINK FENCE 29 \ L � � � � � � / RAIN TURRET \ \ TRASH ENCLOSURE AREA PED RAMP \ \ / 24_ ASPHALT PAVEMENT SO00,'/EAST INFILTRATION BASIN G Sec 46ST AGFAq \ \ X44 ' s ST RkiN PET AREA W/ PEA GRAVEL Sec SOT q4Sp2� 09 SeL 40� EXTENDED PARKING �t / B612 CURB & GUTTER \\ SeL \ \ Set LIGHT POLE LOCATION �4- 9 \ a 0 N LEGEND: LEGEND: PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED PET / PLAY AREA d4 a a a a PROPOSED 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK a PROPOSED 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - D412 PROPOSED SIGN Q PROPOSED LIGHT POLE SITE PLAN NOTES: 0 40' SCALE: 1" = 40' 1. PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING DIMENSIONS AND AISLE WIDTHS ARE SHOWN TO FACE OF CURB. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO BACK OF CURB. 2. ALL CONCRETE RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS. 6. SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 7. LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED TO RECEIVE A CERTAIN SEED MIX SHALL BE MIXED WITH SEED MIX 25-131. 9. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: LOT'E' SITE AREA±6.00 ACRES CONCEPT'E1' -APARTMENT DWELLING UNITS PROPOSED -(5) LEVEL 150 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDINGS -UNIT COUNT LAND AREA=150 / 6.0=25.0 UNITS PER ACRE • 99 INDOOR PARKING STALLS +(17) TUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS=116 • DETACHED GARAGE STALLS=46 • TOTAL INDOOR PARKING STALLS=162 -INDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=162 /150=1.08 • OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS=184 -OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=184 / 150=1.22 -OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS PER BEDROOM=184 / 235=0.78 • TOTAL PARKING STALLS=346 -TOTAL PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=346 / 150=2.31 -TOTAL PARKING STALLS PER BEDROOM=346 / 235=1.47 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS -PAVEMENT 117,009 S.F. -BUILDING 53,115 S.F -GRASS 91,035 S.F. -TOTAL 261,159 S.F. % IMPERVIOUS 65.1% UNITS FOR REFERENCE ONLY (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURAL) UNIT MIX PER BUILDING (LEVEL 0) 7 UNITS 7 BEDROOMS (LEVEL 1) 33 UNITS 45 BEDROOMS (LEVEL 2) 40 UNITS 57 BEDROOMS (LEVEL 3) 40 UNITS 79 BEDROOMS (LEVEL 4) 30 UNITS 47 BEDROOMS (TOTAL) 150 UNITS 235 BEDROOMS CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 Z O ~ w O J LL LU � N M rn z 00 _ � m O00U U) z O C) 0 U) M L0 LO 0� °° dao N U (n 0 w c� E � WH WYu -0 a.� Q J� o z LU 0 U U E zw< (YQ'N wN cv a) _0 -J ��♦/^� V♦ U) w 0- w cnw0 LLo U)>1M_ L O 0 J� O~ MryJ� U Z C) Lu U7 m = � LU O Q (n O � w O �- CU c O 0 10� N) O O U LU Q o N 0 N Cl) N 0-0-0 M _ U)wU N O O O O i r N N U Q ED S LU L0 o O CO I�: m m Z Q w 0' 0 0 0 DO 0 Y 2 0 LU � 0 0 O J LL LU � N M rn z 00 _ � m O00U U) z C) 0 N� M L0 LO 0� °° dao N Q WLU c� E � WH WYu -0 a.� Q J� o z U) w � 0-0 zw< (YQ'N wN cv a) _0 -J ��♦/^� V♦ ZzzL �Zz aEEC = cnw0 LLo U)>1M_ L O 0 J� O~ MryJ� Z> > QUW OJ w W �V � LU O Q (n O D L o0 �- CU c O z U O p O O U 0-0-0 M _ U)wU G7 0 zN O v LU � N M rn z U) z C) 0 M L0 WZ �A °° dao N Q WLU tY � N WH WYu ll� a.� Q mX .. w Q Hw O zw< (YQ'N wN WwZ Wop ��♦/^� V♦ ZzzL �Zz (nN tri V cnw0 LLo OQ 0 J� O~ MryJ� Z> > QUW OJ w W �V � SHEET NO. LU � z Q LU O �z U a- z LU _o .�CLcn O LU U O LU 00 V) U i7i J LU - p[ O U o0 O z O U SHEET NO. a 0 N W N N N CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612 D `2 °2 N w am rn CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - D412 0 0 0 PROPOSED SIGN Q PROPOSED LIGHT POLE SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING DIMENSIONS AND AISLE WIDTHS ARE SHOWN TO FACE OF CURB. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO BACK OF CURB. 2. ALL CONCRETE RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS. 6. SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 7. LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED TO RECEIVE A CERTAIN SEED MIX SHALL BE MIXED WITH SEED MIX 25-131. (Y OI N CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED LEGEND: OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT pa PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT O ~ w O V SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING. cn z U) O L' L O U) PROPOSED PET / PLAY AREA 0 40' U 0 o � v UJ W H � O O U) j g a N O w 0- w °a a a a a PROPOSED 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SCALE: 1" = 40' Z -UNIT COUNT LAND AREA= 150 / 6.0=25.0 UNITS PER ACRE w O U J • 99 INDOOR PARKING STALLS +(17) TUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS=116 � w O • DETACHED GARAGE STALLS=46 0 � U) a • a PROPOSED 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT m w -INDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=162 /150=1.08 V U) w O • OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS= 184 m W N N N CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612 D `2 °2 N w am rn CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - D412 0 0 0 PROPOSED SIGN Q PROPOSED LIGHT POLE SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING DIMENSIONS AND AISLE WIDTHS ARE SHOWN TO FACE OF CURB. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO BACK OF CURB. 2. ALL CONCRETE RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS. 6. SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 7. LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED TO RECEIVE A CERTAIN SEED MIX SHALL BE MIXED WITH SEED MIX 25-131. (Y OI N CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT Q S JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD O V SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING. cn z ED L0 o W Lu N W H � O O 0. Q j CONCEPT'E1' -APARTMENT DWELLING UNITS PROPOSED LEVEL 150 APARTMENT BUILDINGS N Of Lu -(5) UNIT V Z -UNIT COUNT LAND AREA= 150 / 6.0=25.0 UNITS PER ACRE O U J • 99 INDOOR PARKING STALLS +(17) TUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS=116 I.L w w z • DETACHED GARAGE STALLS=46 m • TOTAL INDOOR PARKING STALLS=162 m w -INDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=162 /150=1.08 V U) w O • OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS= 184 m 0 Lu -OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=184 / 150=1.22,,..11tt co Z 5;z Q -OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS PER BEDROOM=184 / 235=0.78 W U w z z Y O c� -TOTAL PARKING STALLS PER BEDROOM=346 / 235=1.47 z IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS c� -PAVEMENT 117,009 S.F. Q W 0Z 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 E_ O U � N i� E c: iC 0 _j \� : V Q L�O O -0 (a aE E O Ec �0 L y �. Q CL m c C5O og N U) 0 0- O `�° U)0 -c cn 9. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT z JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD O V SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING. cn z SITE PLAN INFORMATION: o W W H Lu W LOT'E' SITE AREA±6.00 ACRES 0. Q j CONCEPT'E1' -APARTMENT DWELLING UNITS PROPOSED LEVEL 150 APARTMENT BUILDINGS Of Lu -(5) UNIT V Z -UNIT COUNT LAND AREA= 150 / 6.0=25.0 UNITS PER ACRE O U J • 99 INDOOR PARKING STALLS +(17) TUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS=116 I.L w w z • DETACHED GARAGE STALLS=46 • TOTAL INDOOR PARKING STALLS=162 w -INDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=162 /150=1.08 V U) w O • OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS= 184 O Q 0 J 0� -OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=184 / 150=1.22,,..11tt co Z 5;z Q -OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS PER BEDROOM=184 / 235=0.78 W U w • TOTAL PARKING STALLS=346 -TOTAL PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=346 / 150=2.31 -TOTAL PARKING STALLS PER BEDROOM=346 / 235=1.47 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS -PAVEMENT 117,009 S.F. -BUILDING 53,115 S.F -GRASS 91,035 S.F. -TOTAL 261,159 S.F. Lu z % IMPERVIOUS 65.1% UNITS FOR REFERENCE ONLY (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURAL) UNIT MIX PER BUILDING J (n (LEVEL 0) 7 UNITS 7 BEDROOMS W O (LEVEL 1) 33 UNITS 45 BEDROOMS _ Z U (LEVEL 2) 40 UNITS 57 BEDROOMS (LEVEL 3) 40 UNITS 79 BEDROOMS Q (LEVEL 4) 30 UNITS 47 BEDROOMS w (TOTAL) 150 UNITS 235 BEDROOMS 0 cn O Lu U o V 00 u J— O W p[ > U m 4- 0 z O u 2i SHEET NO. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 r� N N co O a0 0 co LC) � lf)� Z °D �op N [Y O W Y U� mX Lu" w N U)op I_ N u) O Q. N LL M 0 0ti O w �2 z Q J _O V) z Lu rlFES l8" CMPev: 958.62 \ WEST INFIL. BASIN - 100 -YEAR HWL: 955.90 TREATMENT VOL.=5,329 C.F./j \� o a 0 N �S O� \ R'm=945.34 - N .5/ Rim -6.9/ lnv-9 7 NORTH INFIL. BASIN - 100 -YEAR HWL: 946.20 TREATMENT VOL.=726 C.F. 10'X 140' STANDARD FLE AMAT (OR EQUAL)/ F �a AUL \\� �9S\\ \.9 sem 9 \9SS\ 9S9 S - •S FES 36" CMP S - � Elev.• 932.55 S \ Rim=942.27 - f / \� Inv=933/2 S \ Rim -942.66 Rim=943/7 a H `\ lnv=932.86 36 As 946 \ �� Rim=94362 W Inv.=934.20 \ E In v. = 934.20 947 \S lnvD63=939.47 / /u•( EOF=946.\\ p 8 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 IP -RAP \ •1 8" PVC SDR 35 Sani. �L 94 g4 94j ° • \\ , \ CP 94j'94s � . .. ., ` \``\ �� •lam �G fit � '�C ` � Rim= \ \ OF=958.50 '9SS `9S8 Inv.=942.57 V \�� \ Rim= 46.34 _ s\� \ Inv.=935.52 \ S 30" RCP ------- --� S Rim=948.16 - Inv. -93379 / I.- Rough location of trail Rim=949.05 =93 7.73 Rim= 50.44 Inv.=34. 9J4.,7 C \ SL / \ / / 951 -950 / / / / / 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / / C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP EAST INFIL. BASIN 100 -YEAR HWL: 956.26 TREATMENT VOL.=1,952 C.F. h10 /--2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP -406 / mo / rn / SBL o / / 4 - LEGEND: 984- E. 0. F. 84E.O.F. PROPOSED RIP RAP PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SLOPE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW GRADING GENERAL NOTES: 0 40' SCALE: 1" = 40' 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEER BEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS WORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND COMMENCING WORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT SILT AND DEBRIS RUN-OFF DURING GRADING OPERATIONS (I.E. SILT FENCE, STRAW BALES, ETC.). 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH GRADING PLAN, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TO REMAIN. MEET EXISTING GRADES ALONG STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, AND DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENTS THAT REMAIN TO THEIR ORIGINAL IF NOT BETTER CONDITION. NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT. 5. TURF ESTABLISHMENT AREAS SHALL RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH AS MEASURED IN PLACE OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL GRADED SLOPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 5:1 SHALL BE HYDROSEEDED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETED, OR MULCHED TO HELP STABILIZE THE SLOPES BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE TOP OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ELEVATION OF FLOW LINE IS 6" BELOW TOP OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT, FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL AS REQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT. 8. IT IS NOT INTENDED THAT EARTHWORK (CUT VS. FILL) BALANCE ON SITE (DUE TO BASEMENT PARKING EXCAVATION). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AND AMOUNT OF ANTICIPATED GRADE ADJUSTMENT FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF FOUR WEEKDAYS PRIOR TO MAKING ADJUSTMENTS. ALL GRADE ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR WORK ASSOCIATED WITH GRADING ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EARTHWORK OPERATIONS, STORM SEWER PIPING AND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS, CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR ADJUSTING FEATURE LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY, SILT FENCE, ETC. 9. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -SEED OR RE -SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. 10. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE, OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR) 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES, PIPING, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. 12. ALL ACCESSIBLE ACCESS ROUTES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 2% CROSS SLOPE AND 8.3% STEEPNESS WITHIN RAMPS. ADDITIONAL ADA STANDARDS ARE TO BE FOLLOWED. z 0 F-wu) O O U o � (n W H > W U) U � W O CL W Z 0 m W = CO F- � w O 0 0� U) Oof ddd N 2 2 0 0 0 z rn o co O N O U E ° �E�° 14 \Q) : V -'' 2 L� 0-0 N (� E E O ac N N OL �. Q a m c UO pN U) o 0- las0co _"U)0 -U G7 0 zN O v LU � N M rn m z C) 0 - M L� W cn J Z00 �0? N LU z Q z z _ O LD LU z �mQ W I.- LL O c� Q W (Z' 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL O U E ° �E�° 14 \Q) : V -'' 2 L� 0-0 N (� E E O ac N N OL �. Q a m c UO pN U) o 0- las0co _"U)0 -U G7 0 zN O v LU � N M rn z z C) 0 - M L� W cn J Z00 �0? N Q z Q N WHWY'c") J a QU LU .. - �mQ W I.- LL O Z "J ZwQ WN Q' 64 Cp LLI wLLuZ 00 Wop �C♦j^) V♦ � � 2 Z:)ZZ (1) 'CO, OM V W O LL CO O0 �J� O~ MryJ� Z>> QUW OJ W �V V �H SHEET NO. C5 LU � z cn J � +_j z Q Q Wp J zQ z W 0- aA 0 O < W U o DC V J 00 U +_j� Q J J Ur - p[ 0 W U U m O 0 z O U 2 SHEET NO. C5 a \` /// ,942• \ Rim; 3.22 Ind 11 cmp fES 3 932 55 Ele\�rnvg42.65 _ 17 trail Rim�932.86 of (� I Inv.�g3 Rough IpC°tion !L / \_943.62 I 943.85 TC \ y � \ _ 943.85 FIL \ / \ \ Rimg 4 20 678 944.30 TC 36' RGP \ / ES11nv,939.47 / 944.30 FL 944.41 TP Sani. 0 Rir0-944351 5.°1° FL a. % \ VC SDR 35 V Rim'949'73 RGP NE 9 945.05 15 TC Q` ° ?�o �� S \ \ \ _ 8 P / R m;942.57 Inv�g37 30 945.15 FL //6.02 TIP g334 591 - / 946.06 TP 4 944 943.05 TP\ - 36' Rim,g35 52 3D . RCP . i �� g5D 44 \ \ In R�In .093 <v \ �\ 6 949.10 TP 949.95 TC Z NORTH INFIL. BASIN / 946 948' 948.30 TC O e • \ \ Rim g33.79 94830 FL 949.45 FL 100 -YEAR HWL: 946.20 945.75 FG o v.' S 943.25 TP " EOF=946.50 8 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 948.25 TC 949.85 TC \ / TREATMENT VOL.=726 C.F. T � _ 948.50 TP g4- - / , /� /� \ S 947.75 FL 950.10 TCT 949.35 FL 994.°75 FG ,,,,////'v/ 948.42 TC 949.60 FL 943.80 TP � S � X948.66 TC 948.42 FL 947.50 SW_ �, � � � 948.16 FL • 943.54 TP � 950.45 TPI � 947.75 FG \f - / O°p 948.61 TC o, 950.16 TP 943.74 TP �iS` \� \ 9 948.11 FL s O b\ • 947 �:.�,• 947.75 FG 944.75 TP I I \ �j\ 1 I 948.85 SW 2.1% o ° • ° oN� p 946 •po'�o \ U , - 948.95 TC LL _ e e 945 945 ��• \ ._ - \ �P C1' S2 W 948 70 FL 9 .50 SW .� ° 948.45 FL 949.65 TC 950.61 TP -946 • \ \� 946.05 TP o" EOF=949.00 949.00 TC 949.50 TW 1 949.55 FL 948.00 BW 947 948.50 FL - - a 949.00 TC 949.75 TC - °a �J� 949.90 SW o t / J JJJ !f 945 948.50 FL 949.75 FL J Jy 948.50 TW m' g N _ / / y 948.00 BW N In 944.95 TP 950.00 FG 948.50 TW X946 949.15 5 TC ° a �4q S� 950.25 TC 948.00 BW \ \ 948.65 FL 949.75 FL / JJ�J .. 4 AFL 1 J J JJ 950 imp 2 - - _ _ _ g 949.63TC 950.00 FG / JJ J 949.50 TW F meg- 4 - 947 - - - - - - 49.9 - - - - - °vr u.949.34 TC 949.25 FL / Jay J 948.00 BW FE=950 00 \ _^ 33 948 946.25 TIP 0 .%$ CC _ 949.13 FLS 949.75 TC / J 948.50 TW N 093 a 950.62 SW<iJy 949.90 SW B - - - 948.84 FL 10' X 140' STANDARD FLEXAMAT (OR EQUAL 880.50 sw ✓J 948.00 BW-®y4y.90 sW 950.00 sw - - 949 _ ssz.00 TW 949.60 TC // JJ _ 949.90 SW v 949.85 TC 949.08 TC 949.10 FL SBl M 949.33 TC J 949.08 FL _ 949.70 TC A 949.35 FL o 2°� 949.17 TC 949.75 TC 948.83 FL J 9 951 ° 949.17 FL58 949.75 FL R 2 949.85 TC 949.20 FL `� /� e , 949.90 SW 952.00 FG - �C SD 3.i /� 952 _ �\ \949.85 950.10 TC I° \ yo / SBL -955.00 TW L 949.60 FL 950.17 TC- rn y o s \ 953 949.85 SW 949.67 FL 95 954 950.35 TC \ / 20 TC 949.85 FL 950.55 SW cn �� 949.70 FL 951.46 TW °° 955 0 �9 950 950.50 FTC L ` co 3'� 950.00 FL PROPOSED 956 / J OScn-N-pp .� O� p,Ll LVA 1 FFE P96RTMENr - 950.45 TC J J J J.J i <v 949.90 SW _ PRpP ` `N\'�S _ GgRgGE F 1.00 949.95 FL / J JJ 5� V FEzz950 �957.00TW y �1 00 950.50 TC �J 950.00 FL 950.50 TC / `VJ 957.00 TW 958.50 FG C \ 950.00 FIL 950.00 BW 953.00 TW J $ X1954.00 FG / J J J 960.00 FG F ° �`► I\ J FE=961.Op g52 a 955.12 SW J J�J ^ \ tl' `rte 955.00 SW? J 961.00 SW o G 8 STEPS W/ 1' � 957.00 TW 960.80 SW , 956.80 FG 4�,i 953.00 BW 960.55 SW 961.00 SW . - 1 956.80 FG 960.86 SW ° M 960 TREAD, 6" RISERS 960.80 SW / , EOF=955.80/ 961.00 SW I ' o O O 953 \ ��.� 960.65 SW �irn ° O 960.60 SW VVWWW�� 960.80 SW O 961.00 SW / 958.00 TWA 960.50 SW 960.68 SW O ri 957.00 BW 950.86 TIP • 960.45 SW O 960.80 SW FFE_ 956.00 FG a 959.00 FG °a 961 ° ° , 954 / ° • . POOL (BY OTHERS) .O0 P `� , e • ° 960.12 SW O °' �Q ' • e S 18 2 / 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP ?o, , , 01 4 960.10 TW a4 ° 960.82 SW 955/ / FE , 958 ° =y° 960.10_TW / 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP E1ev' 961.00 SW e o° ° � O 959.60 BW ° , ° , • 955.35 SW 959.60 BW CM 960.62 SW 961.00 FL , ; ° ° . �° 960.10 TW 960.55 SW e 955.25 TC 955.50 TC / 960.68 SW ? "� ° 959.52 SWC O e . 954.75 FL / So 960.10 BW 960.50 FG ° 955.00 FL 960.18 FL .7% 959.52 FLT°° L�l W 955 yy , l 960.40 SW • , , ^ � Q 960.62 SW o m gSs / ?00 960.25 TC I ,o � ° �� •� / / y �► ° Wv., vp 960.02 SW °° 959.40 FG 10 10% 955.00 FL •'�' y 959.75 FL ° ^ 959.52 FL O o ° 960.00 SW I e TC 955.50 FL ® ° S 956.50 FG e ° 960.10 SW °°�� 956.00 SW • 96 O� 959.85 TC , ° \ � / 959.60 FL e aw ° _ le 950.00 FG Q 955.90 SW 956.10 SW � / / , / EOF=955.80 ° , 960.02 SW � 959.90 SW � � , 959.50 TC 959.60 TC „(( .4 ° \ �y 960.29 TC ` , ( 959.52 FL 57.50 FG 957.99 TW 959.79 FL 959.25 FL 959.35 FL 959.20 TP 9959.52 SW9.52 FL 960.00 SW -J , 957.65 e • 958.00 SW SW �o° 956 /\ 958.62 SW / 957.00 BW F ' M ® 3 70 959.20 TP 959.50 FLS ° r 959.90 SW 958.50 SW �`'� FL 2.0% 959.77 TC e. 7% p< 958.10 SW 959.27 FL 959 959.80 SW 959.51TC _ 959.30 FL 959.36 FG 958.90 TC �o \\ LL 959.01 FIL N 959.79 SW N 958.40 FL WEST INFIL. BASIN 959.90 TC ° 959.29 FL 958.80 TC ° 958.00 TC 100 -YEAR HWL: 955.90 �� 959.40 FL 959.48 TC 958.30 FL 957.50 FL TREATMENT VOL.=5,329 C.F. / 959.63 TC 959.48 FL 959.33 TC / 959.13 FL ?20 958.83 FLS° • �• / / ^ gyp 79° FL 0.7% 959.05 TIL 3.0% 958..55 FL/956.85 FL / 2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 4 0 959.50 TC W� o° hyo 959.00 FL ~ �• 959.13 TC 958.25 TC / :7 yy 959.90 TC e' 958.63 FL 957.75 FL �9 8 958.65 TC 8\1 CO S 957.80 TC 3. %o 957.30 FL J ,� 959.40 FL 1�• 958.15 FL o / / 960.16 TC o 957.85 TC ® 959.66 FL 2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 988 FL 0.5% 959.00 TC e 957.35 FL EAST INFIL. BASIN 959.00 FG yy 959.50 TC 956 958.50 FL o / / ° 959.00 FL -955 955 %�•i N / 1 00YEAR HWL: 956.26 ' -x-958 957 958 ^ '• •/ 957.50 TC / / TREATMENT VOL.=1,952 C.F. 959.8 TC 31% �� ?00 959 957.00 TC / / 953.75 FG y i /..• 9 957 95 \° 57.00 FL 956.50 FL 959.80 FL ^ y o'v 8 / / / / ° • • rn u. !•. ' 955 955 ss rn Ft- 2' 4 • / / 956.25 FG 960.35 TC e p • `� 12 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 LL FL 1.0% X956 EOF=958.00 0 .• S / / 959.85 FL RIP -RAP IN FORT 960.00 TC 957 �••••�• •,•959.50 FL FL 0.9 % 958 • ;i �1 •0 959.20 SW o e ° , i9 958.00" TWA 960.05 TC 959.77 TC 95.8 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP b \ / cr 957.00 BW °\° 959.27 FL _ 958.00 TC 959.32 SW / .-.� 959.80 FL Nb 958.25 TC �`YO "l rn / / 2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / ° m °i 1 957.75 FIL 2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP .! ^ \957.50 FL 950.37 TC CENTRAL INFIL. BASIN 's° \ � 550.12 FL °\° 100 -YEAR HWL:958.37 FL 0. 7% 958.27 TC \ 960.05 TC 1? °, / 958.88 TC 957.50 TW �° o� o ti� ,TREATMENT VOL.=7,626 C.F. 957.77 FL 959.55 FL 958.38 FL e, • 957.00 BW 958.45 TC •� / ° 960.25 TC Qv e� 0 960.75 TC 959.15 TC 957.95 FL - / 955.00 SW 959.00 FG , ^ /'• 960.50 FL 958.65 FIL LL / V 959.75 TC 960.00 FL VV 959.25 FL / <3�0 e ` LL 959 /� / 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / 959.12 SW 4 EOF=959.00 961.00 TIP° B 955.30 TC 959.82 SW ° F< 958.80 FIL /7 ' �.�, 955.21 TC FL 2.0% a , ° 961.26 TC ° _ < ?Oo F 960.76 FL , e ° 960.60 TC 958.71 FL \ 558.57 TC 958.10 TC / / LEGEND: 959.60 TC ° !?2 0 �° ° `�� • 960.10 FL 960.50 TP 959.95 TC ti 958.17 FL 957.60 FL ^ / v 961.50 TC ° e 42.00 960.55 TIP T / 960.60 TC 959.10 FL 59.95 C 961.00 FL �7 959.45 FL <11 960.10 FL 555.30 TC F 559 45 FL 959.93 TC ° eW • � 960.15 TC / 958.80 FL 080 ° `960.69 FL )60.69 TC 959.43 FL 959.65 FL �` A / 960.90 SW / ,F� 4Io •a �NDppR ° 3?°�0 &50-0 960.15 TC--"° 555.78 TC o GARq � �a / y':, PROPOSED RIP RAP 960.15 FL 959.28 FL o 2Q GE P LL F(?.0 958.45 TC �•,o•.� of 960.76 SW ' g, / 961.00 TC i STALLS P1, 26 STARK�NG 2.8 % 957.95 FL 959.70 TC V 960.50 FL 960.50 TP '�< 960.66 TC tilEj' qLL / X980.50 TC NEW TOP -BACK OF CURB ELEVATION 960.16 FL 60.10 FL F� 40% 955.30 FL \ i 958.23 FL 966.50 FG SB X90 � ° 959.20 FL STALLS � P2� 560.50 TP 9 60 TC 955.80 TC 958.73 TC NEW FLOW LINE OF CURB ELEVATION 961.00 SW 963.50 FG / 960.80 TC 961.05 TC 3 0/ FF = T STALLS I � / X 980.50 FL 960.43 TC E 960.50 3.1% \ IV / L964\S 966 9 S 964 963 962 B 960.3 �FL� y 960.55 FL 959.93 FIL - _ s /� �, / / X 980.50 SW NEW SIDEWALK ELEVATION X966.50 FG --959.69 TC o 959.70 TC FL 1.3% i 1 W 959.20 FL SBL o� - - 959.19 FL 959.83 TC SBL 960.50 TP 960.90 TC / / / X 980.50 TP NEW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION '/\° 955.33 FL\ SBL 960.40 FL F WN SBL 2.1% F/2 X980.50 TG NEW TOP OF GRAVEL ELEVATION 960 � SBL � 4 seL 96`3, 50 FG / o 1 / � / X98050 BW NEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION s . EOF=959.00 - FL 1.3 % ° BL SBI_ 960.50 TP J I 560.45 TC /m / 960.40 TC "' 10 960.32 TPJ I seL 955.55 FL SBL SBL1 X980.50 TW NEW TOP OF OF WALL ELEVATION 959.90 FL _ _ - \1° / / 959.20 FG 959.58 TC 959.00 FG FL1,4% �ry FLS / / X980.50 FG NEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION 959.08 FL EOF=958.50 960.05 FL j 960.55 TC 31 j x 980.50 Ex EXISTING ELEVATION 958.5 TL 95 -9S -_954 _9,55 956 -957 cgs 958.50 FL '� 960.50 FG----- - - - - - - 1�\° sss.7sTc / 984 PROPOSED CONTOUR _ 960.00 TC - - - _ 959.50 FL -----_ - - - - - FL 959.25 FL - - - - - 9,5/ 95 958.50 FG N 96 0 FG 8.50 TC 988.00 FL � PROPOSED SLOPE 959.50 FG 950.25 TC - _959.75 FL 555.50 FG 959.50 FL E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 955-- 955 0 30' SCALE: 1" = 30' Z O ~ W � 100 F- O U o � (n W > W U) U 0� D Ln 0'- 2 W 0� U 0- W Z p m W = 0 � p W O O O Q N N N Q 2 2 � N O O O O c r N N z O Z � O C> O N i m Co m 0 W L Z Y O J 00 04 0 0 0 0 0 LL L U O O N L 0 ^ LO E'c': ° ( , U O `v O 4) v -0J z CL N C L _U O '` � c O Cw J Q E E C >' a� co 1 Q O Q- (p C 0 O Q 0- O C6 _ Q U) 0- U) O zN O v N M v / ` O O M L0O lfj � WZ 00 Q op LU �O N N W H Wy',g a m > � XQ .� W H W Z O"J WN ZwQ Q'N w�wZ -1-F Z V/) ?>ZWZ�~�M OQ 0Wp LLCO MryJ� �J� O~ W �V Z>> OJ QUW �w SHEET NO. C6 LU � z Q L.L. O z U z zQ Q LU CL cn O z ,`7/ O oc J LU - p[ O U m O z O5 U L SHEET NO. C6 \ \ FES l8" CMP Elev.- 958.62 \ WEST INFIL. BASIN - 100 -YEAR HWL: 955.90 TREATMENT VOL.=5,329 C.F./j FES 18" CMP -\ / Elev.- 959.01 \ // CONNECT TO EX. 8" DIP WM. INSTALL 8"X6" TEE FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERTS 4/m=960.99 6" GV �\\ In v. =948.30 Inv.=949.3 <'• y�2 T °K 109 CBM RIM -958.38 8 \ DIA: 48"00 _CAST R -3067 -VB\ ` =943.33 �o\ \ N;Rm=945.34 Inv=941.5/ 1 \ / Rim=i46.91 - ln� 935.41 NORTH INFIL. BASIN 100 -YEAR HWL: 946.20 TREATMENT VOL.=726 C.F. R` NE I / /� n tc / 112 STMH RIM=946.00 DIA: 48"0 / CAST: PS SW INV.=942.942.50 NE =942.50 10'X 140' STANDARD FLE AMAT (OR EQUAL)/ FA / AUL a o 4 10 REUIUNAL PUND I / / T UL / K �- 5 S - \ FES 36" CMP Elev. • 932.55 \ Rim=942.27 Inv.= 933. 12 \m=942.66 \ \ Rim=943.17 \ \ Inv.=932.86 CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB (FIELD VERIFY LOCATION & INV.) / SW INV.=941.75 \ \ Rim=94J.62 2 / Inv.94.20 E y� \ E Inv.= 9J4.20 D673 \ \S lnv.=939.47 EOF=946.50 - \ 8 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 8" PVC SDR 35 Soni. �s \ \ . Inv-9Z-9ZCONNECT TO EX. 8" STUB Rim=94 \ EXTEND 8" SDR -26 SANITARY SERVICE 20 LF @ 0.50% MIN. -CONNECT TO EX. 8" PLUG Inv -942 57 Rim=946.34 Inv. =935.52 CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB Rim=948.1 (FIELD VERIFY LOCATION & INV.) Inv. -933799 S INV.=940.00 _ � T S Rough location of tra/l Rim=949.05 / Inv.=93773 Rim=950.44 til / /• 104 CBMH / RIM=949.25 \ / DIA: 48"0 951 / CAST: R -3067 -VB -950 / W INV.=945.25 SW INV.=945.25 / n SV / 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / /--103 STMH RIM=955.50 DIA: 48"0 / CAST: PS48-58S / NE INV.=951.50 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP EAST INFIL. BASIN 100 -YEAR HWL: 956.26 TREATMENT VOL.=1,952 C.F. C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP X / �-6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / 102 FES 4UV / NV.=954.25 / / m / / 0 / m / 4- LEGEND: w S O. -40i :000°o i 0 40' SCALE: 1" = 40' PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATER LINE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED FITTING PROPOSED WATER SERVICE PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE PROPOSED FLARED END SECITON PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED GATE VALVE & BOX PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED CLEANOUT PROPOSED RIP RAP UTILITY GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL UTILITY RELOCATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS WORK AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND COMMENCING WORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH GRADING PLAN AND EXISTING UTILITIES, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TO REMAIN. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AS EXISTING IN THE FIELD AND AS REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEER BEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5. VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING SANITARY LINE AT POINT OF CONNECTION WITH NEW SANITARY LINE PRIOR TO INSTALLING ANY NEW UTILITIES. 6. ALL CROSSING ELEVATIONS OF NEW UTILITIES & SIZES OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES ARE BASED ON ASSUMED ELEVATIONS AND SIZES PROVIDED BY THE SURVEY. 7. ALL SANITARY SERVICE PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SDR -26 PVC. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING TWO CONSECUTIVE PASSING BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS FROM THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE. 9. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY CONCRETE PAVEMENT WHICH IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED WATER, SANITARY, STORM SEWER SERVICE INSTALLATION. 10. FOR WATER SERVICE LINES #12 AWG SOLID COPPER CLAD STEEL (CCS) WIRE WITH 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) INSULATING JACKET, COLOR BLUE. 11. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER. NO DEWATERING IS EXPECTED FOR THIS SITE DUE TO SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR PAVEMENT REMOVAL, UTILITY INSTALLATION, AND REPLACEMENT AS NEEDED. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM FINAL ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 14. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE OVER 18" IN DIAMETER SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES: 15.1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 15.2. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS/PRODUCTS: 15.3. FERNCO, "CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS" OR "LARGE -DIAMETER WATERSTOPS" 15.4. PRESS -SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS" OR APPROVED EQUAL 16. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR). 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND GUTTER. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCH BASINS TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING. 18. THE CITY SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS. ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. 19. THE CITY, OR AGENTS OF THE CITY, ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD ARE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MEET THE CITY'S STANDARDS. 20. ALL WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. COPIES OF ALL TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY (PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, CITY ENGINEER), THE OWNER, AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 21. WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 7.5'. 22. TRACER WIRE INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS. SEE THESE STANDARDS FOR FURTHER DETAILS. 23. THE CITY WILL REQUIRE TELEVISING FOR SANITARY AND STORM SEWER PIPE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR THE UTILITY SYSTEM; PROVIDE REPORT AND VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. Z O ~w O LU U o � (n W > W U) U � W U 0- W Z p m W = � H 0 � O O M o U J LON O N i U O O N L �Ec° 14 \Q) a°i-0J V O O -0 (>3 E E -O N >, M =1O L y } M�' p CL t m C C5O -g 1 N '0 0 � O O N Q O (10 M _ 0-W D zN 0C14 LU Cl) rn m z ao 0 lb m D W Z 00 �op N W Z Z W _ O U U CU r` Z �mQ W I- LL O"J O WN Q' 64 WLWLI Z W J 0 0 0 0 > Z ?ZZ 0 IL i U O O N L �Ec° 14 \Q) a°i-0J V O O -0 (>3 E E -O N >, M =1O L y } M�' p CL t m C C5O -g 1 N '0 0 � O O N Q O (10 M _ 0-W D zN 0C14 LU Cl) rn z z ao 0 M L� W Z 00 �op N Q W �o N WH W Y� a g U CU r` .� �mQ W I- LL O"J Z ZwQ WN Q' 64 WLWLI Z W 00 W o0 F__N rQ1'� /C/p� V♦ > Z ?ZZ OM V U) LU O li � 00 Oo O F_> 06 _j Z> QUW O J W V)O -H V) LU z Q W O �z U LU Q 0 CL cn O LU U V)O N J J LU - p[ O U m O z O U SHEET NO. C7 I \ \ lo \ WEST INFIL. BASIN - 1 00 -YEAR HWL: 955.90 TREATMENT VOL.=5,329 C.F./j FES /8" CMP / E/ev.• 959.0/ \ / 4 )e'K 10,895 SQ. FT. (PER.) \ 9 NORTH INFIL. BASIN—\ 100 -YEAR HWL: 946.20 TREATMENT VOL.=726 C.F. i _LE AMAT (OR EQUAL / .0 12,193 SQ. FT. (PER.) 2 C.Y. OF CLASP 2 ,IP -RAP IN FOR'B/ 10,381 SQ. FT. (IMP.) /'Al 000-0 -1,365 SQ. FT. (PER.) Se< \ \ \S194 -EOF=959.00 1'K FES J6" c„ Elev.- 932.55 \ \ Rim=942.27 /Inv =933.12 / \ Rim -942.66 P6 \ \\ Rim=9 \ `e EOF=946.50 8 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP e �• oe �h 293 SQ. FT. (IMP.), 946 8 726 SQ FT (IMP ) X947\ PR( -.POSED AP TML -"'T (150 UNITS TOTAL) p _ Rpp / 00 22 SQ. FT. (IMP.) Gq� O7p 9pgRT -955.80 gGFF F967.00 FNT FFF, 95.00 967 C.Y. OF CLP.,382 RIP -RAP 00 \ P3 252 SQ. FT. (PER.) �o 863 SQ. FT. (PER.) U898 SQ. FT. (PER.) I,/ l E_A 431 SQ. FT. (PER.) s� �� 12,925 SQ. FT. (IMP.) 1,091 SQ. FT. (PER.) i\ \ 6,631 SQ. FT. (PER.)iM `oar 1,487 SQ. FT. (PER.) -950 � 951 / rn 952 / / 955' / 9ss _-6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP .. 'Q56. / •b° / ss / / IEOF=955.80 / P2 / 2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP ! EAST INFIL. BASIN / 100 -YEAR HWL: 956.26 / TREATMENT VOL.= 1,952 C.F. o / / /2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / 9,579 SQ. FT. (PER.) 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP 240 SQ. FT. (PER.) \ 255 SQ. FT. (PER.) / F - �o / / / / / / LEGEND: E.O.F. PROPOSED RIP RAP EMERGENCY OVERFLOW AREA TYPE BOUNDARY SUBCATCHMENT BOUNDARY DRAINAGE NOTES: 0 40' SCALE: 1" = 40' GENERAL DESCRIPTION: THE MONTICELLO SUITES CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 -LEVEL APARTMENT WITH OUTDOOR AND INTERIOR PARKING. THE SITE IS 6.0 ACRES. THERE IS 117,009 S.F. OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT AND THE 2 BUILDINGS MAKE UP AN AREA AROUND 53,115 S.F. THE SITE ENTRANCES ARE LOCATED ON 7TH STREET WEST AND ELM STREET. SOILS AND INFILTRATION ACCORDING TO THE WEB SOIL SURVEY, THE EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS ON THE SITE IS A 20 INCH LAYER OF SANDY LOAM WITH GRAVELLY COARSE SAND. WITH EXCAVATING THE TOP LAYER OF SOIL, THE BASINS WILL INFILTRATE INTO THE COARSE SAND (HSG) A WITH AN ASSUMED INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR. A DOUBLE -RING INFILTROMETER TEST IS REQUIRED TO BE CONDUCTED BY A LICENSED SOIL SCIENTIST OR ENGINEER TO VERIFY INFILTRATION RATES OF EACH INFILTRATION BASIN AFTER BASINS HAVE BEEN GRADED. RATE CONTROL A REGIONAL POND HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR 7TH STREET WEST AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE EXISTING OUTLET B WAS DESIGNED TO UTILIZE A CN OF 89. THE FOLLOWING CURVE NUMBERS AND AREAS WERE USED TO VERIFY THE PROPOSED CN IS LESS THAN THE PREVIOUS CN DESIGN OF 89. TYPE AREA CN PAVEMENT 117,009 98 BUILDING 53,115 98 GRASS/PERVIOUS 91,035 61 TOTAL WEIGHTED 261,159 85 ALL STORM WATER IS DIRECTED TO THE STORM SEWER WITHIN 7TH STREET WEST TO OUTFLOW TO THE REGIONAL POND. HDYROCAD CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN DONE FOR THE PROPOSED SITE TO DETERMINE THE PEAK ELEVATIONS AND FLOW RATES OUT OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS. (CONTACT BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES FOR THE REPORT IF NEEDED.) THE PEAK ELEVATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS ARE LESS THAN 1 FOOT OVER THE EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS. EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS ARE ONLY UTILIZED FOR 100 -YEAR STORM EVENTS. WATER IS DIRECTED TO STORM SEWER MANHOLES BELOW THE OVERFLOWS. VOLUME RETENTION FOUR INFILTRATION BASINS ARE PROPOSED ON SITE TO PROVIDE VOLUME CONTROL FOR A 1.1 INCH STORM. WITH 170,124 S.F. OF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, 15,594 C.F. (577 C.Y.) OF VOLUME IS REQUIRED TO BE HELD WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASINS. THE COMBINED VOLUME OF THE BASINS TO THE INITIAL OUTLET IS 15,633 C.F. (579 C.Y.) THE FOLLOWING TABLE ADDS TOGETHER THE VOLUMES OF THE BASINS. WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. z O ~ w O Lu O U 0 > U) W �_ > LU W D U 0 � W O 0- W Z 0 m W = o � o W o 0 0 Q N N N 0 (D 0) N O O O Oof i Hd N � p o o U L0 O o OLuol N CONTOUR AREA VOLUME BETWEEN CENTRAL INFIL. BASIN N M 955 551 Lr) m 956 2499 1525 M L� a) -0 J 957 4582 3541 m 0 957.5 5661 2561 TOTAL: U > aEE�= 7626 Z NORTH INFIL. BASIN Y 945 307 (D w w z W S 946 1145 726 TOTAL: C� Q W 726 2 WEST INFIL. BASIN 0 0 953 982 0 LL U c D 'F �H 954 2403 1693 w 955 3927 3165 Q Lu 955.5 4727 2164 TOTAL: 5329 EAST INFIL. BASIN O 954 187 O 955 1674 931 G 955.8 3207 1952 TOTAL: 1952 COMBINED VOLUME 15633 WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. z O ~ w O Lu O U 0 > U) W �_ > LU W D U 0 � W O 0- W Z 0 m W = o � o W o 0 0 Q N N N 0 (D 0) N O O O Oof i Hd N � p o o U L0 O o OLuol N zN 00 _ ° U m Lu N M o� z Lr) m C) 0 iv E c o m M L� a) -0 J J� o z a, a� - 0 m 0 uJ •• _U J m N (� O —J U > aEE�= _ .. Z Z Y O Q' 64 (D w w z W S z m �" O Q N N �M D L C� Q W O Q 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL zN 00 _ ° U m Lu N M o� z Lr) ami ° C) 0 iv E c o M L� a) -0 J J� o z a, a� - 0 L m '` � ° Cw _U J m N (� O —J U > aEE�= _ .. � W D�m� L O �- O"ZJWN a� a Q' 64 iv ;vim. w w z W S rQ1'� /�//�� V♦ m �" O Q N N �M D L W O Cp O Q �J� 0 �~ " c Z>> QUW OJ W �V U c D 'F �H 000 O O N a)0-0-0 w m m _ " U) d 0 - c zN O v Lu N M J z v / ` C) 0 M L� WZ �A J 00 2 o N Q Lu z N WWY'c") a.Q U > rU r-- co _ .. � W X Q F- LL O"ZJWN ZwQ Q' 64 w w z W u) op ~ rQ1'� /�//�� V♦ > Z ?ZZ N �M V W O Cp O Q �J� 0 �~ " MryJ� Z>> QUW OJ W �V �H SHEET NO. C�:3 Lu J z J J z Q wLu �z u zQ w LLJ CSA •� 0 z cn O Q LU U O 000 w J - c Q Lu m U _ O O O G SHEET NO. C�:3 s S / Rim=942.48 T / \ lnv.=9/4.58 \ � CT LEGEND: TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 0 20' \ / i =943.33 S EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N) _ \ •� \I SCALE: 1 - 20 FESs 36" CMP 3 - S RM=945.34 \ \ Elev. 93255 3 - \ N;Inv.=941.5/ Rim -942.27 STANDARD SEED MIX W W W W W W W Inv.=933./2 S Rim=9J6.9/\Inv / S \ \ \•\ \ _ S In v. -935.4/ S \m=942.66 s \ W WWWWWWWWWWWWW INFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX / / c Rim=943 /7 8" Sani. � Ri 9. �\ \ \ lnv.=93286 / Wd NE Inv.=Qst, \ `\ \ / In . tuh946 e ' INSTALL 276 LF OF DOUBLE LAYER Rim=943.62 S / W W < TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (552 LF TOTAL) W Inv=934.20 SODDED GRASS OR LANDSCAPED AREA E Inv-934.20D ^�/"� WM - � � W +' W W W 47 W W \ � \S lnv.=939.47 vL�1u.,( GRADING LIMITS AND PROPOSED -SF W W W OF=946.50 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE / W W SOD GRASS\\ \ / + 8" PVC SDR 35 Soni. • W W W 4. W 4 _\\ FIBER -LOG ROLLS /SOD GRASS • Rim= •yam. \ \ Inv.=942.57 Rough location of trail !•i7 PROPOSED RIP RAP �i :•«t! I.4, / • ° / ®W W W W 9 Rim= 935.52 Wa so W W W C7� \ 4K984 PROPOSED CONTOUR AUL / / o W W g 1,985 S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 30" RCP \ E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW oh/ • - Rim=949.05 Inv. =937. 73 W . ,W W W \ INSTALL 820 LF _ < 30" RCP TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER- HIGH FLOW W INFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE Rim -948.16 wW W _ 1 /n v. INSTALLALL 1042 LF � / _ W INSTALL 20 LF �OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT L� Rnv=934.14W \` 1,040 S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STANDARD SEED MIX SOD GRASS A W / . W / STANDARD SEED MIX W,. W / \ W W W \ W / W W , / / / / / / 700 S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET W ( \-INSTALL 20 LF sk OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOG W W/ W � INLET PROTECTION (TYP.) EOF=958.\ / Sgt � f W W / INSTALL 1176 LF --- OF F OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE 4- 9 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE CONSTRUCTION/GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. 2. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S STORM WATER PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 3. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR GRADING OPERATIONS AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE PERMIT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY MEASURABLE RAINSTORM. DAMAGED SILT FENCE OR OTHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR PRACTICES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DEVICES SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. 5. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION. 6. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND THE MPCA. 7. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE DISTURBANCE OF ANY AREAS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL TRIBUTARY DISTURBED AREAS ARE RESTORED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING SILT FENCE AND BALES, UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT VEGETATION IN SAID AREAS. 9. ALL SOILS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER OFF-SITE AREA SHALL BE REMOVED DAILY. 10. THE SITE SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES FOR THE PROJECT MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION. 11. ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED AND VEGETATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE TO MN/DOT 2575. 12. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITH MN/DOT SEED MIX, MULCHED, FERTILIZED & DISK ANCHORED, PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: STANDARD SEED MIX 25-131: 220 LB/AC. INFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX 33-261: 35 LB/AC. FERTILIZER 22-5-10: 350 LB/AC. MULCH TYPE 3: 2 TONS/AC. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BMP'S SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON PLANS DURING PHASING ON PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH MPCA, CITY INSPECTOR AND DEVELOPER REQUEST. APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES • SILT FENCE: 4,828 LF • BIOLOG: 1,102 LF • ROCK CONSTRUCTION: 1 EACH • INLET PROTECTION: 17 EACH • EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N): 3,980 S.Y. • RIP RAP (CLASS 2) 54 C.Y. NOTE: AMOUNTS SHOWN DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR REPLACEMENT OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMPS FOUND TO BE NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. Z O ~ w ° LU U o � cn W > W U) U 0� W U CL W Z 0 m W = 0 � O W O O O Q N N N O O O Oof i Hd N -3 -) -) 0 O O 0 L0N O W co O U _ � N L O -o N� !!♦ m E C o -0 _j � ami : V O -0 N (a a)ME E O N >, N 2 O lE - L Q c C5O -2 N U) 0 Q O cv L-11 m - U)0 -U U) 0 zN I O v LU N M m 9)I U)z C) 0 Co Co 0 W cn cz °° G opN Q W LL N Z Y - O z > LU .. W �-LL O"J Z ZwQ Q W 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL O U _ � N L O -o N� !!♦ m E C o -0 _j � ami : V O -0 N (a a)ME E O N >, N 2 O lE - L Q c C5O -2 N U) 0 Q O cv L-11 m - U)0 -U U) 0 zN O v LU N M z 9)I U)z C) 0 M L W Cl) cn cz °° G opN Q W LL N WH WYcl) J a g > LU .. W �-LL O"J Z ZwQ WN Q'N w LUZ (n °o I_N rQ1'� /cp V♦ >Zw ?ZZ WA V W 0 L� o O0 �J� O~ MryJ� Z>> QUW OJ W �V �H cn LU z cn Q WO� J �z U zQ O LU \I / O O LU U o U O 0 O J L c_n LU DC O U m O W z O U SHEET NO. a N STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE: GENERAL INFORMATION THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT NO. MN R1000001 FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PROJECT NAME: MONTICELLO RESIDENTIAL SUITES LOCATION: ELM ST & 7TH ST W, MONTICELLO MN SHERBURNE COUNTY LAT/LONG: 45.301553, -93.809709 DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 -STORY APARTMENT BUILDING, GARAGE, ASPHALT PARKING, GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION, AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. PROJECT CONTACTS PAT BRIGGS AND THE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP PREPARATION: 5.97 SWPPP PREPARER: CHRISTOPHER DAHN 0.00 -BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES TRAINING: ENGINEER AND SWPPP DESIGNER (EXP 2025) ADDRESS: 13076 FIRST STREET 3.90 BECKER, MN 53308 TELEPHONE: 763-262-8822 EMAIL; CDAHN@BOGART-PEDERSON,COM OWNER: TEMPORARY PUMP SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE EA OWNER CONTACT: PAT BRIGGS ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 719, BIG LAKE, MN 55309 TELEPHONE: (612)-919-1561 EMAIL; PAT@THEBRIGGSCOMPANIES.COM CONTRACTOR (TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR): BUSINESS NAME Z OWNER NAME Y MAILING ADDRESS N �N CITY w w z TELEPHONE Z EMAIL �M CONTACT NAME p Lu MAILING ADDRESS 0� CITY J TELEPHONE 0 EMAIL 0 LL ESTIMATED DATES OF CONSTRUCTION: START DATE _/ / (TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR) COMPLETION DATE _/ / (TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR) PERMANENT STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS SEE THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION. CONTACT BOGART PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES FOR REPORT. PROPOSED FLOW RATE IS LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTING THE WATER NORTH TO A REGIONAL POND PREVIOUSLY SIZED. VOLUME CONTROL IS PROVIDED THROUGH 4 INFILTRATION BASINS ON SITE TO CONTAIN 1.1 INCHES OF RAINFALL OVER THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. SOIL GROUP: A/B DESCRIPTION OF EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITY: EROSION CONTROL CONSISTS OF SILT FENCE PERIMETER CONTROL, TURF ESTABLISHMENT THROUGH SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLACEMENT. CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 5.97 ACRES PRE -CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.00 ACRES POST CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.90 ACRES NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.90 ACRES RECEIVING WATERS: STORM WATER FROM THIS SITE WILL BE DISCHARGED TO THE CITY STORM SEWER WHICH IS DISCHARGED INTO A REGIONAL POND. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THE PLAN SHEETS OF THIS PLAN SET INDICATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: • THE PROJECT LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. • LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. • LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., BUFFER ZONES, WETLANDS, ETC.). • STEEP SLOPE LOCATIONS. • LOCATIONS OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT. • THE DETAIL SHEETS INDICATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT. • IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DOWN GRADIENT SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOG INSTALLATIONS ARE TO BE INPLACE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. TOPSOIL IS TO BE WINDROWED ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND PLACED AS SLOPE DRESSING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE GRADING OPERATIONS, AS THE GRADING OPERATIONS PROCEED. TOPSOIL PLACEMENT ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES THOUGH THE WETLANDS AREA IS TO BE SPREAD BY A LOW IMPACT CRAWLER TRACTOR OPERATING UP AND DOWN THE SLOPES SO AS TO PROVIDE TRACK PRINTS PARALLEL WITH THE CONTOURS. INSTALLATION OF MN/DOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES ADJACENT THE WETLANDS AREA. ALL TEMPORARY SOILS STOCKPILES WILL REQUIRE AN EFFECTIVE MEANS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL SUCH AS AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET COVERING OR SILT FENCE INSTALLATION ALONG THE TOE OF SLOPE. ALL COMPLETED SWALES SLOPES AND BOTTOMS NOT DRAINING TOWARDS WETLAND AREAS ARE TO BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION WILL BE REQUIRED IN AREAS WHERE GRADING OPERATIONS ARE SUSPENDED OR CEASED FOR A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS OR GREATER. A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE PROJECT ENTRANCE ON ELM STREET. STREET SWEEPING OF THE PAVED SURFACES WILL BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. TIMING OF EROSION CONTROL: SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOGS WILL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. RIPRAP AND FILTER BLANKET WILL BE PLACED AT THE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE OUTLET PLACEMENT THE CONTRACTOR MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION WHEREVER CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT OCCUR FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 7 DAYS. STABILIZATION WORK MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN 200 FT OF A PUBLIC WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETING CONSTRUCTION DURING PERIODS OF "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" FOR TIME PERIODS DECLARED BY THE DNR. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DISTURBED AREA UNTIL VEGETATION IN ESTABLISHED ONCE VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE SILT FENCE AND ANY OTHER TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL THAT IS NOT BIODEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED. STREET SWEEPING TO BE PROVIDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER. THE CITY REQUIRES STREET SWEEPING TO OCCUR WITHIN 8 HOURS OF NOTICE FROM THE CITY. APPLYING MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE STABILIZATION IN ANY PART OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE. BLANKETS OR OTHER APPROVED, BY THE ENGINEER, METHOD SHALL BE USED. u�y�xars•��r_vu>t•ranrrana►�y�_zar►•irri� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AND SCHEDULING THE WORK OF ALL OPERATIONS, INCLUDING SUBCONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES, SUCH THAT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE FULLY EXECUTED FOR EACH OPERATION AND IN A TIMELY MANNER OVER THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. OPERATORS HAVE DAILY ACCESS TO THE PROJECT SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION UNTIL THE ENTIRE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND N.O.T HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A TRAINED INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON THE PROJECT. THAT INDIVIDUAL IS TO BE IDENTIFIED AT THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND LISTED IN THE MINUTES THEREOF. THE APPOINTED INDIVIDUAL IS TO PERFORM A ROUTINE INSPECTION OF THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. A INSPECTION FORM WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ARE TO BE NOTED ON THE INSPECTION FORM AND CORRECTED BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY. PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED WHEN THEY ARE NO LONGER EFFECTIVE OR WHEN THE SEDIMENT REACHES ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. TRAINING DOCUMENTATION: SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, REVISING, AMENDING, AND INSPECTING (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR) NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OVERSEEING & INSPECTING DATE OF TRAINING NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING CONTENT OF TRAINING TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING BMP INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR) NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OVERSEEING & INSPECTING DATE OF TRAINING NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING CONTENT OF TRAINING TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING POLLUTION PREVENTION FERTILIZERS ARE TO BE APPLIED ONLY IN THE AMOUNTS AS SPECIFIED AND WORKED INTO THE SOIL TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO STORMWATER RUNOFF. ONSITE REFUELING OPERATIONS ARE TO BE CONDUCTED WITH CARE. ANY INADVERTENT SPILLAGE OF FUEL OR CHEMICALS IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS MAJOR SPILLS ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE MPCA 24 HOUR NOTIFICATION NETWORK AT 800 422 0798. ALL VEHICLES ON-SITE ARE TO BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND SUBJECT TO ROUTINE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EFFORTS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF LEAKAGE AND OR SPILLS. 1•�:ir•� 3r ya�irr_va-orc��r:�y_zyurri y_v��r•� 3��:z•1,.iu�a z•��yrr�a►i.�a�airia z•��ra 21:10wa M_1y CONCRETE BATCH TRUCKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DISCHARGE DRUM AND CHUTE WASHOUT DIRECTLY ON THE GROUND. A PORTABLE WASHOUT RECEPTACLE IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE LOCATION AS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. FINAL STABILIZATION FINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS WHEN 70 PERCENT OF THE PERVIOUS AREA IS COVERED WITH UNIFORM, PERMANENT VEGETATION. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND THE NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT PLAN DESCRIPTION TITLE LOCATION EROSION CONTROL DETAILS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C8 -C9 EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONS EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONS C6 24 HOUR MPCA EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 651-649-5451 800-422-0798 ESTIMATED QUANTITIES THE FOLLOWINGUIRED FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL UANITITES IS AN ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY AMOUNT REQUIRED Q BMP'S AT THE START OF THE PROJECT. THIS ESTIMATE IS PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ANY ADDITIONAL AND/OR REPLACEMENT BMP'S QUANTITIES WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. Q ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY QUANTITIES AT START OF PROJECT: O ITEM UNIT ESTIMATED INITIAL QUANTITY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT EA 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER EA 17 TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT EA 1 TEMPORARY PUMP SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE EA 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS LF 1,102 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 3,980 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N) SY 3,980 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. PREVENTION OF SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, AND STORM AND SANITARY SEWERS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 1.02 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM. MINNESOTA PERMIT NO: MN R100001. 1.03 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. B. DO NOT BEGIN CLEARING, GRADING, OR OTHER WORK INVOLVING DISTURBANCE OF GROUND SURFACE COVER UNTIL APPLICABLE PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED; FURNISH ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED TO OBTAIN APPLICABLE PERMITS. 1. OBTAIN AND PAY FOR PERMITS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. C. TIMING: PUT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IN PLACE PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF SURFACE COVER AND BEFORE PRECIPITATION OCCURS. D. EROSION OFF SITE: PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL AND DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT ON OTHER PROPERTIES CAUSED BY WATER LEAVING THE PROJECT SITE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT. 1. PREVENT TRACKING OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC ROADS OUTSIDE SITE. 2. PREVENT MUD AND SEDIMENT FROM FLOWING ONTO PAVEMENTS. E. SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF SITE: PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF THE PROJECT SITE, INCLUDING RIVERS, STREAMS, LAKES, PONDS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, STORM SEWERS, AND SANITARY SEWERS. 1. IF SEDIMENTATION OCCURS, INSTALL OR CORRECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY AT NO COST TO OWNER; REMOVE DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS; COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. F. MAINTENANCE: MAINTAIN TEMPORARY PREVENTIVE MEASURES UNTIL PERMANENT MEASURES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE: WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE GEOTEXTILE RESISTANT TO COMMON SOIL CHEMICALS, MILDEW, AND INSECTS; NON -BIODEGRADABLE; IN LONGEST LENGTHS POSSIBLE; FABRIC INCLUDING SEAMS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM AVERAGE ROLL LENGTHS: 1. AVERAGE OPENING SIZE: 20 U.S. STD. SIEVE, MAXIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4751. 2. PERMITTIVITY: 0.05 SEC^ -1, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4491. 3. ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANCE: RETAINING AT LEAST 70 PERCENT OF TENSILE STRENGTH, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4355/D4355M AFTER 500 HOURS EXPOSURE. 4. TENSILE STRENGTH: 100 LB -F, MINIMUM, IN CROSS -MACHINE DIRECTION; 124 LB -F, MINIMUM, IN MACHINE DIRECTION; WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632. 5. ELONGATION: 15 TO 30 PERCENT, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632. 6. TEAR STRENGTH: 55 LB -F, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4533. 7. COLOR: MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD, WITH EMBEDMENT AND FASTENER LINES PREPRINTED. 8. SILT FENCE POSTS: ONE OF THE FOLLOWING, MINIMUM 5 FEET LONG: a. STEEL U- OR T -SECTION, WITH MINIMUM MASS OF 1.33 LB PER LINEAR FOOT. b. SOFTWOOD, 4 BY 4 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION. C. HARDWOOD, 2 BY 2 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: FILTER LOGS SHALL CONSIST OF TYPE WOOD FIBER BIOROLLS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPEC. 3897. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. SHALL BE SILTSOXX PERIMETER CONTROL BY FILTREXX, INC., OR EQUAL. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. DROP-IN SEDIMENT FILTER UNIT THAT INSERTS INTO THE INLET. 1) SHALL BE FLEXSTORM PURE: PERMANENT INLET FILTER BY ADS, INC., OR EQUAL. (a)PROVIDE CURB OPENING PROTECTION FOR EXISTING INLETS WITH CURB OPENINGS. D. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 1. ROCK SHALL BE CLEAN 1 TO 2 INCH WASHED ROCK. E. TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 1) SHALL CONSIST OF A UNIFORM WEB OF INTERLOCKING STRAW OR WOOD FIBERS SANDWICHED BETWEEN AN ATTACHED TOP AND BOTTOM LAYER OF NET BACKING. 2) THE NETTING SHALL BE BIODEGRADABLE CONTAINING SUFFICIENT UV STABILIZATION FOR BREAKDOWN TO OCCUR WITHIN A NORMAL GROWING SEASON. 3) STAPLES USED TO ANCHOR THE BLANKETS SHALL BE U -SHAPED, 11 GAUGE OR HEAVIER STEEL WIRE HAVING A SPAN WIDTH OF 1 INCH AND A LENGTH OF 8 INCHES OR MORE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM AFTER BENDING. 4) THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE: (a)GEO-SYNTHETICS, INC., - LANDLOK 52. (b)NORTH AMERICAN GREEN - S150. (c)OR EQUAL. b. BONDED FIBER MATRIX. 1) THE FIBERS SHALL BE COMPOSED OF 100% WOOD OR WOOD BY-PRODUCTS. A MINIMUM OF 25% OF THE FIBERS SHALL AVERAGE 10.16 MM (0.4 INCHES) IN LENGTH AND 50% OR MORE SHALL BE RETAINED ON A CLARK FIBER CLASSIFIER 24 MESH SCREEN. FIBERS SHALL BE COLORED WITH A WATER SOLUBLE, NON-TOXIC DYE, TO AID IN UNIFORM APPLICATION OVER THE SITE. 2) THE BINDER SHALL BE A HYDRO COLLOID BASED (GUAR GUM) WITH ADDED SLOW-RELEASE AND AGRICULTURAL BASED FERTILIZERS. THE BINDER SHALL NOT DISSOLVE OR DISPERSE UPON REWETTING. 3) THE BFM SLURRY SHALL DRY TO FORM A CRUST APPROXIMATELY 3-6 MM (1/8 TO 1/4 INCHES) THICK ADHERING TO THE SOIL SURFACE. 4) THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE MATRIX SHALL BE 12% +/- 3% BY WEIGHT. 5) THE MATRIX SHALL CONSIST OF MATERIALS THAT ARE 100% BIODEGRADABLE AND 100% BENEFICIAL TO PLANT LIFE. 6) THE MATRIX SHALL PROVIDE 100% CONTINUOUS COVERAGE AND SHALL HAVE NO HOLES GREATER THAN 1MM IN SIZE. 7) THE HYDRATED MIXTURE DENSITY SHALL BE APPROXIMATED BY A SLUMP TEST PRIOR TO APPLICATION. 8) THE BFM MULCH: WATER RATIO SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. THE MINIMUM BFM MULCH TO WATER RATIO IS 50LBS BFM MULCH AND 100 GALLONS WATER. THE WATER RATE WILL VARY BETWEEN 100 GALLONS AND 125 GALLONS PER 50LBS, DEPENDING ON WHICH OF THE PRODUCTS IS USED. 9) THE BONDED FIBER MATRIX MULCH PRODUCTS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE. (a)ECOAEGIS - MANUFACTURED BY CANFOR. (b)SOIL GUARD - MANUFACTURED BY MAT, INC. (c)CONWED 3000 - MANUFACTURED BY CONWED FIBERS, INC. F. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEWN INTO A BAG USING A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE AND HIGH STRENGTH THREAD. a. SEAMS SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE WIDTH STRENGTH OF 60LB/INCH AS PER ASTM D4883 AND MEET OR EXCEED THE FOLLOWING. 1) GRAB TENSILE OF 205 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4632. 2) PUNCTURE OF 110 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4833. 3) FLOW RATE OF 95 GAL/MIN/SF AS PER ASTM D 4491. 4) PERMITTIVITY OF 1.5 SEC -1 AS PER ASTM D 4491. 5) MULLEN BURST STRENGTH OF 350 PSI AS PER ASTM D 3786. 6) AOS% OF 80% US SIEVE AS PER ASTM D 4751. 2. SPOUT LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A 4 INCH DISCHARGE HOSE WITH STRAP TO TIE UNIT CLOSED. 3. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. DIRTBAG. 1) ACF ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2831 CARDWELL ROAD, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23234, 800-448-3636. b. DANDY DEWATERING BAG. 1) DANDY PRODUCTS, INC., P.O. BOX 1980, WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43086, 800-591-2284. c. OR EQUAL. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 PREPARATION A. SCHEDULE WORK SO THAT SOIL SURFACES ARE LEFT EXPOSED FOR THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF TIME. B. THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OPERATOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER PERMIT NO. MN R100001. C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AND SIGN THE NOTICE OF INTENT, OBTAIN THE OWNER'S SIGNATURE, AND SUBMIT TO THE MPCA. 1. PROVIDE A SIGNED COPY TO THE OWNER. 3.03 INSTALLATION A. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 1. THE ROCK AREA SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES DEEP, EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE EGRESS AREA AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 50FT LONG, HOWEVER, LONGER ENTRANCES MAY BE REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY CLEAN THE TIRES. 2. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF MUD FROM THE UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE ROCK. B. TEMPORARY SILT FENCES: 1. STORE AND HANDLE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4873. 2. USE NOMINAL 30 INCH HIGH BARRIERS, MINIMUM 60 INCH LONG POSTS SPACED AT 6 FEET MAXIMUM SPACING. 3. EMBED BOTTOM OF FABRIC IN A TRENCH ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE, WITH 6 INCHES OF FABRIC LAID FLAT ON BOTTOM OF TRENCH FACING UPSLOPE; BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT. 4. MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT. a. STEEL POST = 24 INCHES, MINIMUM. b. WOOD POST = 18 INCHES, MINIMUM. 5. DO NOT SPLICE FABRIC WIDTH; MINIMIZE SPLICES IN FABRIC LENGTH; SPLICE AT POST ONLY, OVERLAPPING AT LEAST 18 INCHES, WITH EXTRA POST. 6. FASTEN FABRIC TO WOOD POSTS USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: a. FOUR NAILS PER POST WITH 3/4 INCH DIAMETER FLAT OR BUTTON HEAD, 1 INCH LONG, AND 14 GAGE, 0.083 INCH SHANK DIAMETER. b. FIVE STAPLES PER POST WITH AT LEAST 17 GAGE, 0.0453 INCH WIRE, 3/4 INCH CROWN WIDTH AND 1/2 INCH LONG LEGS. 7. FASTEN FABRIC TO STEEL POSTS USING WIRE, NYLON CORD, OR INTEGRAL POCKETS. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: 1. PERIMETER CONTROL SHOULD BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO THE BASE OF THE SLOPE OR OTHER DISTURBED AREA. 2. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE PERIMETER CONTROL ON 10 FT CENTERS, USING 2 IN BY 2 IN BY 3 FT WOODEN STAKES. IN THE EVENT STAKING IS NOT POSSIBLE, I.E., WHEN PERIMETER CONTROL IS USED ON PAVEMENT, HEAVY CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL BE USED BEHIND THE PERIMETER CONTROL TO HELP STABILIZE DURING RAIN EVENTS. D. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTERS. 1. DROP-IN SEDIMENT TRAP. a. PLACE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. E. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. F. TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 1. PLACE AT ANY AND ALL FINISH SLOPES THAT ARE STEEPER THAN 10HA V. 2. SEED AND FERTILIZE PER SPECIFICATION 32 9219 PRIOR TO INSTALLING TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 3. BONDED FIBER MATRIX. a. INSTALL THE BFM AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM GUIDELINES. 1) THE BFM SHALL BE APPLIED WITH HYDRAULIC SPRAY EQUIPMENT BY A MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFIED APPLICATOR. 2) APPLICATION SHALL BE DONE AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PROJECTED RAINFALL TO ALLOW THE BFM MULCH ADEQUATE TIME TO DRY. 3) THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN TWO STAGES (ONE-HALF RATE) WITH AMPLE TIME TO DEWATER THE FIRST APPLICATION. 4) THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED FROM AT LEAST TWO ALTERNATE DIRECTIONS, PREFERABLY 90 DEGREES APART, IF POSSIBLE, TO ENSURE ALL SOIL FACES ARE COVERED. 5) THE INSTALLATION RATE OF THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE 3500 LBS PER ACRE, MINIMUM AND 100% COVERAGE. 4. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. a. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 3.04 MAINTENANCE A. INSPECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES WEEKLY, WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE END OF ANY STORM THAT PRODUCES 0.5 INCHES OR MORE RAINFALL AT THE PROJECT SITE, AND DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. B. REPAIR DEFICIENCIES IMMEDIATELY. C. TEMPORARY SILT FENCES: 1. PROMPTLY REPLACE FABRIC THAT DETERIORATES UNLESS NEED FOR FENCE HAS PASSED. 2. REMOVE SILT DEPOSITS THAT EXCEED ONE-THIRD OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. 3. REPAIR FENCES THAT ARE UNDERCUT BY RUNOFF OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED, WHETHER BY RUNOFF OR OTHER CAUSES. D. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT. 1. PERIODIC ADDITION OF ROCK, OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF PAD SHALL BE PROVIDED AS VOIDS BECOME FILLED WITH SOIL. E. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. REPLACE THE UNIT WHEN 1/2 FULL OF SEDIMENT OR WHEN SEDIMENT HAS REDUCED THE FLOW RATE OF THE PUMP DISCHARGE TO AN IMPRACTICAL RATE. F. PLACE SEDIMENT IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS ON SITE; DO NOT REMOVE FROM SITE. 3.05 CLEANUP A. REMOVE TEMPORARY MEASURE AFTER PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. B. WHERE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY MEASURES WOULD LEAVE EXPOSED SOIL, SHAPE SURFACE TO AN ACCEPTABLE GRADE AND FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT GROUND SURFACES. END OF SECTION MISSISSIPPI RIVER (IMPAIRED WATER) SITE LOCATION 1 MILE RADIUS IMPAIRED WATERS MAP RI hAarttic�ge r nµntry [I uh f3ialr COLirse Rd 0.5 MI r - 4ti +o O�"•s - ea�41 �L a it �tiapfiaii AVE Monticelli Z O ~ w O � O 0 0 U) W > WZ) ULLJ D U) W U 0- W Z 0 M W _ (2 � W O 0 0� U) W N N N Q o 0 0 m rn � � N w rn rn 0 0 0 OLu of M 2 2 0 0 o N o :2U a co N 0 co Lo O U � N O N cv E c o \(1) 0 �J V O_ L�O o Cw aE E c U) >, m 0 L Q a. N 8T p 020-1 2 aC o :3- L rn 0- W G7 O C Z _U m J 0 CL O 'L 0 _N m 0 zN Lu O v N M IT Q W O m �z 00 o 0 - co Loj- �A Wz °° 2 N 00 m 0 W W Y� a QU w r� .� - Z Z Y - O N �N U w w z U) op ~� Z >ZW ?ZZ �M V p Lu Q W 0� 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 LL O U � N O N cv E c o \(1) 0 �J V O_ L�O o Cw aE E c U) >, m 0 L Q a. N 8T p 020-1 2 aC o :3- L rn 0- W G7 O C Z _U m J 0 CL O 'L 0 _N m 0 zN Lu O v N M IT Q W O ♦♦^^ z �z 00 o 0 - co Loj- �A Wz °° 2 N Q W N W H W Y� a QU w r� .� - Of W mQ F LL Ozw< (D Z Jw N �N w w z U) op ~� rQ1'� /U/�) V♦ >ZW ?ZZ �M V cn W O 'D 0 O �J� �~ coJ� Z>> QUW OJ W �V F,H SHEET NO. W a z V) Lu z Q W O �z u zQ LI.J 5 O Lu U o (1) O rr n) 4 V J- Lu O U co O z O u SHEET NO. W a z V) EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF ' R7-1 (MODIFIED) R7- M81N z H 121Nxl8IN WHITE ON BLUE a U w u) WHITE ON BLUE .�, 4" CONCRETE � � � 0 8" DIA. REINFORCING STEEL 2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE o R7-8bP SPACED AT 181N ON CENTER EACH WAY 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE Ll Z) U 121Nx6IN U)0'- g WHITE ON BLUE TACK COAT Lu W a INCH STEEL CAP WELDED a INCH STEEL CAP WELDED ° ° ° a ° ° ° ° 12" U Z p Lu m 2 AND GROUND SMOOTH AND GROUND SMOOTH ^' G ° °° ° ° 12" Q > O 0 � 18 60 18 COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE � �/ / �\ 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE /\\\ \ /\\ \ \/\/ / / \ / / /\\/\ Lu ~ co N co N co N 60" 24 m coco 6"MIN. SCARIFY AND COMPACTED SUBGRADE 12" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 42" 42" 00 rn rn FINISHED GROUND LINE FINISHED GROUND LINE Lu 1 Oif N o� i r —t / . 11 CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION N p 6 INCH SCHEDULE N.T.S. N.T.S. U W N a 6 INCH SCHEDULE 40 STEEL PIPE o O 40 STEEL PIPE CONCRETE FILLED a o N CONCRETE FILLED ° 48" 48" CONCRETE m CONCRETE 'WHITE' MARKING �� 0 m 0 W z z Y - 3:U O EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE UJ LL Lu a a a PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN Q W � 2 J If -18" �I 18" L L ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF 0 0 0 0 0 u- 00 NO PARKING SIGN SITE ACCESSIBLE SIGN U O C\l 1/21N DIA. REINFORCING STEEL D-6" REINFORCED CONCRETE _0-0— �, SPACED AT 181N ON CENTER D/2= 3" O >, N � NOTE: EACH WAY iv c f , 1. L= DIMENSIONS AS 'BLUE' MARKING ADJACENT TO SHOWN ON PLANS ACCESSIBLE PARKING 6" TYP 03 v -0 J J O Z CENTER OF STRIPE TO CENTER OF O a >+ W STRIPE d a ° ° - �` U J NOTE: ° a 1. ALL POSTS AND ANCHORS SHALL BE 2. STRIPE WIDTH SHALL BE 41N. a E 12 GAUGE WITH HOLES ON ALLco L O FOUR SIDES 2. SIGNS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE 3. STRIPING ADJACENT TO ACCESSIBLE SUBGRADE o PARKING SPACES SHALL BE BLUE 12" MIN WITH THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TYP• ca } O T UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL m c U DEVICES v 0 c c T '7 O Q O_ O m(6 i 7 ff11L ��/+� L VI LL VJ vJ SITE SIGNAGE WITH BOLLARD PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. z N O 604 M a7 ♦^ % v / ` O O CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING: GENERAL NOTES: Lo 1. PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION 1. INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (IN ACCORDANCE WITH A .. Lo 00 CONTROL PRACTICES. MnDOT GENERAL CONDITIONS 2573) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION W C 2 w OPERATION THAT MAY CAUSE ANY SEDIMENTATION OR SILTATION AT THE SITE. Q Lu N 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE DOWELED ISOLATION JOINT W w Y,, TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE DURING 2. INSTALL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE STORM U THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. SEWER AND SEDIMENT LOADS TO DOWNSTREAM STORM WATER FACILITIES OR HAND RAIL A cU a, > m 3. ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT -CONTROL WATERBODIES. REINFORCE PER CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL 10„ x X w < U w F BMPS MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT 3. IF THE STORMWATER BMP IS BEING DESIGNED TO SERVE AS A TEMPORARY Lu (D Z -i w N LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS. SEDIMENT BASIN, GRADE THE BMP TO WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE TO t 1" 3 O Z w F- F- 00 PROTECT THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL FROM CLOGGING. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IN 12" w w Z Z U)00 4. REMOVE TOPSOIL FROM THE SITE AND PLACE IN THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS NOSING WITH > g STAIR TEMPORARY STOCKPILE LOCATION. TEMPORARY SEED STABILIZED, EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO FINAL GRADE AND COMPLETE ANCHOR INTEGRALLY ? Z � Z � M U) r.0 THE STOCKPILE. CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMP. CAST TO UNDERSIDE Lu � co li O p 5. INSTALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY 4. GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING RISER PER CIVIL DRAWINGS TOP OF CHEEK WAL -1 W od Q Z W U W SEWER, ELECTRIC AND PHONES) TAKING THE LOCATION LOW -IMPACT EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE 12� —TREAD DEPTH PER PLANS AND FUNCTION OF STORM WATER BMPS INTO UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER NO. 5 REBAR @ 12" O.C. EACH CONSIDERATION. TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. DOWELED ISOLATION JOINT 10" REINFORCE PER CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL 7. SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. 5. EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH (ELEVATION). IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ALL SUB MATERIAL BELOW THE SPECIFIED ELEVATION�/_ BOTTOM OF CHEEK WALL " `''. *.. • " ' ^ r � 8. CONSTRUCT THE ROADS TAKING THE LOCATION AND SHALL BE LEFT UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. (ELEVATION PER PLAN) 24"MINIMUM FUNCTION OF STORM WATER BMPS INTO CONSIDERATION. Uv 24"� 6. GRADE TO THE DEPTH (ELEVATION) SPECIFIED IN THE CONSTRUCTION 12" 9. PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS TAKING THE DOCUMENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. LOCATION AND FUNCTION OF THE STORM WATER BMPS 6" INTO CONSIDERATION. 7. IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR NO. 5 REBAR FULL WIDTH OF STEPS. W z IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE ALL FILL SHALL BE AGGREGATE PROVIDE 3" OF CLEARANCE FROM EDGE 12" 12" 10. FINAL GRADE THE SITE. REMOVED FROM THE BASIN PRIOR TO INITIATING THE NEXT STEP IN THE BASE MATERIAL OF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN WASHED INTO THE BASIN 11. STABILIZE THE SITE BY IMPLEMENTING THE NATIVE DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS CAN SEAL THE PERMEABLE MATERIAL, SEEDING AND PLANTING PORTION OF THE LANDSCAPING SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE SOILS. PLAN. J W :38. SEEDING AND INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE Q _ O 12. INSTALL THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET COMPLETED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. HAND RAIL z U 13. REMOVE THE SILT FENCE AFTER THE SITE IS STABILIZED 9. INFILTRATION AREA SHALL BE STAKED OFF DURING CONSTRUCTION TO RESTRICT z Q a--+ PER PROJECT ENGINEER APPROVAL. HEAVY EQUIPEMENT TRAFFIC FROM COMPACTING NATIVE SOILS. W a 0 NOTE: 36„ NO. 5 REBAR @ 12" O.C. TO REBAR IN STEPS) Vi O Lu 0 SEE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CHEEK WALL PROVIDE 3" CLEAR FROM EDGES W U LOCATION OF INLET STRUCTURES, EMERGENCY OVERFLOW, ELEVATIONS, ETC. � Ir = W EMERGENCY OVERFLOW RIP RAP I V) N U (PER GRADING PLAN) 1'J (PER GRADING PLAN) r n OUTLET STRUCTURE IN SLOPE 2' MIN. RISERS PER CIVIL DRAWINGS J O (SEE UTILITY PLAN) s' MIN. DETAIL SHOWN IS TYPICAL SEE W ^/ 00.7 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (STRAW, CATEGORY 3N) U W cC SLOPE PER GRADING PLAN BOTTOM OF CONCRET GRADING PLAN FOR ACTUAL /� • �� FLARED END SECTION /\ 24 12 NUMBER OF STEPS O (PER UTILITY PLAN) /\ \\ �\ z RIP RAP INLET PROTECTION SEEDING WITH SEED MIX 33-261 (35 LB/AC) /\ \ O U d d (SEE GRADING PLAN) d d �/ \ ° e d d / ALL FILL SHALL BE AGGREGATE \r , BASE MATERIAL d d < d < d d SHEET NO. A d d < SECTION A INLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE UNCOMPACTED NATIVE PERMEABLE SOILS CONCRETE STEPS WITH CHEEK WALLS (WITH RAILINGS) c 1 INFILTRATION BASIN STAIRS (WITH CHEEK WALLS & RAILINGS) N.T.S. N.T.S. METHOD FOR TREATING EDGES EXPOSED TO SURFACE SHEET FLOW EDGES EXPOSED TO SURFACE EDGES NOT EXPOSED TO FLOW SHALL HAVE THE SURFACE FLOW DO NOT NEED OUTSIDE 2 BLOCKS RECESSED TO BE RECESSED O 12 INTO THE SUBGRADE AT 45 — .... DEGREE ANGLE SUBGRADE WITH SITE SPECIFIC SEED MIX LEADING EDGE ANCHOR TRENCH AND OVERLAP SEAMS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW 18" ANCHOR TRENCH FLEXAMAT STANDARD UNDERLAYMENT 5 -PICK LENO WEAVE DOWN CHANNEL FLEXAMAT STANDARD VERLAPPED MAT WITH FLOW PANELS ARE SHINGLED 18" SOIL AND SEED UNDER PREVIOUS PANEL 18" U -ANCHORS IN 2' INCREMENTS ACROSS 11 I ABUTMENT SEAM OR I II I _ STAINLESS STEEL ZIP TIES CAN BE INSTALLED IN 1' INCREMENTS - 18" U -ANCHORS INSTALLED 18" U -ANCHORS IN 2' INCREMENTS BEHIND INSTALLED IN 2' FIRST EXPOSED BLOCK INCREMENTS ACROSS OVERLAP ABUTMENT METHOD FOR WIDER THAN 16' 6" STANDARD UNDERLAYMENT EXTENSION 12" GEOGRID \ EXTENSION " CURLEX II ECBI F— FLEXAMAT STANDARD CHANNEL - LAYOUT PARALLEL TO FLOW CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. AN ENGINEER OR MANUFACTURES REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE ONSITE FOR THE START OF THE INSTALLATION. 2. GRADE CHANNEL SO THAT WATER WILL FLOW DOWN CENTER OF THE CHANNEL AND BE CONTAINED TO THE CHANNEL. ALL SUBGRADE SURFACES PREPARED FOR PLACEMENT OF MATS SHALL BE SMOOTH AND FREE OF ALL ROCKS, STICKS, ROOTS, OTHER PROTRUSIONS, OR DEBRIS OF ANY KIND. 3. PRIOR TO FLEXAMAT STANDARD INSTALLATION SEED AND FERTILIZE THE PREPARED SUBGRADE WITH SITE SPECIFIC SEED MIX AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. INSTALL FLEXAMAT STANDARD ROLLS, USING THE WIDEST ROLLS POSSIBLE TO AVOID SEAMS. 4.1. FOR CHANNELS THATARE WIDER THAN 16', INSTALL 15.5' WIDE FLEXAMAT STANDARD ROLLSTHAT INCLUDE 12" GEOGRID EXTENSIONS WITH A 6" STANDARD UNDERLAYMENT EXTENSIONS. THESE SEAMS ARE PARALLEL WITH FLOW, THE ADJACENT MAT INSTALLED OVER THE EXTENSIONS. ENSURE GEOGRID AND STANDARD UNDERLAYMENT EXTENSIONS ARE LAYING FLATON SUBGRADE PRIOR TO INSTALLING ADJACENT MAT. 4.2. SECURE THE ABUTMENT PARALLEL WITH FLOW BY INSTALLING 18" U -ANCHORS IN 2' INCREMENTS OR 20" STAINLESS STEEL ZIP TIES IN V INCREMENTS THROUGH THE EXTENSION OVERLAP. U ANCHORS OR ZIP TIES TO BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW. ZIP TIES SHALL ENCOMPASS 3 CORDS OF GEOGRID FROM EACH MAT. 5. FOR ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF MAT, SECURE SEAM PERPENDICULAR WITH FLOW BY OVERLAPPING THE DOWNSTREAM SECTION 18" WITH UPSTREAM SECTION OF MAT. PRIORTO INSTALLING OVERLAP, FLIP UPSTREAM MAT BACK 24". EXCAVATE 2.25"' OF SOIL 18" FROM END OF UPSTREAM MAT. DOWNSTREAM SECTION IS LAID IN THE SHALLOW TRENCH. RETURN AND TAMP SOIL OVER INITIAL EDGE AND SEED. FLIP END OF UPSTREAM MAT OVER THE SOIL COVERED AND SEEDED INITIAL LEADING EDGE OF DOWNSTREAM MAT. 5.1. SECURE OVERLAPS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW BY INSTALLING 18" U -ANCHORS IN 2' INCREMENTS OR 20" STAINLESS STEEL ZIP TIES IN 1' INCREMENTS THROUGH THE OVERLAP. ZIP TIES SHALL ENCOMPASS 3 CORDS OF GEOGRID FROM EACH MAT. 6. ATTHE INITIAL LEADING EDGE OF THE FLEXAMAT STANDARD ARMORED CHANNEL, EMBED THE MAT 18" IN A VERTICAL ANCHOR TRENCH. FILL AND COMPACT ANCHOR TRENCH WITH SUITABLE FILL. AT a N ADJACENT FLEXAMAT STANDARD PANEL HAS GEOGRID AND UNDERLAYMENT EXTENSIONS MAT SEAM PARALLEL WITH FLOW 6" STANDARD UNDERLAYMENT EXTENSION 12" GEOGRID EXTENSION MCITZ ENTERPRISES, INC. Flexamat (513)772-6689 Info@Flexamat.com Flexamat"com exams ,'' PERMAII EBT EROSION C"01. WOO Z O O OO U 0 W } U) > WZ ~LLJ 0 U � D_2i W of U, W 0 0 m W of w O 0 � U W N N N 0 c9 rn co N 0 0 0 co2 PLAN VIEW cLrTDTHY-- SPECIFICATION 0 O CNJ 1. STEEL REINFORCED, COLD JOINT SECURED MONOLITHIC CONCRETE PLAN3KW-NQMO STRUCTURE (10,030 LBS). CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMU N 2 2 ! 1. INLET WIDTH AND DISTANCE BETWEEN BACK OF CU COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4,500 PSI AT 28 DAYS, CONCRETE AI Q o CONCRETE INLET -- ► / BACK OF CURB AND RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET MAY VARY WITH S ENTRAINED (5% TO 8.5% BY VOLUME). MANUFACTURED AND DESIGNED Q LJJ CONDITIONS. TO ASTM C858] I z DISTANCE VARIES 2. CONCRETE BASE EXTENDS BEYOND THE FILTER WAL W 2 THREE POINT PICK USING RECESSED LIFTING POCKETS WITH STANDARD HOOK OF THE RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET TO SERVE AS A SPLASH Lu INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE INSURMOUNTABLE CURB FACE DISSIPATORI, 0 O O Lu 3. FIBERGLASS TOP GRATE (32 LBS, 1-12" THICK) - 1,780 L co RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET CONCENTRATED LOAD OR 409 LBISO-FT UNIFORM LOAD. (CONCRETE BASE INCLUDED) N 00 4 3D VIEWS INSTALLATION NOTES J— 1. INSTALL THE CLASS 5 BASE (COMPACTED TO 950 STANDAR L u m �1 PROCTOR). THE DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB MAY VARY U op AI Ty BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS. BUT CONSIDERATIONS SHOULD INCLUDEI a SLOPE OF THE INLET AND BASIN SIDE SLOPES ADJACENT TO THE RAIN� m D W GUARDIAN TURRET. POSITION RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET SO PRIMARY O POSITION RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET SO PRIMARY OUTLET ALIGNS WITH TOE OF BASIN SIDE SLOPE OUTLET ALIGNS WITH TOE OF BASIN SIDE SLOPE TO AVOID SOIL 2 TO AVOID SOIL INTERFERENCE WITH FILTER INTERFERENCE WITH REMOVABLE FILTER WALL. EXCAVATE 1' 10 Z YU- BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION (I.E. THE BIORETENTION L:IjU OVERFLOW ELEVATION) TO ACCOMMODATE THE 1' PONDING DEPTH,_ Z CLASS 5 AGGREGATE, AND 4" RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET BAS X-10" (INCLUDED). THEREFORE, THE TOP OF THE CLASS 5 COMPACTED BASE! Q W 12 IS PRECISELY 1' 4" BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION. THE INLET TO J 0 THE RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET WILL BE 10.12" ABOVE THE TOP OF THE 0 U ELEVATION VIEW CONCRETE BASE AND 1-12' BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION To ACCOMMODATE A SLOPED INLET FROM THE GUTTER TO THE RAN INLET INSURMOUNTABLE CURB GUARDIAN TURRET.I RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET (CONCRETE BASE INCLUDED) RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET INLET 2. SET RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET ON THE PREPARED CLASS 5 BASE TOP FIBERGLASS GRATE - - GUTTERLINE HIGH VOLUME OVERFLOW 3. INSTALL FRAMING FOR INLET BETWEEN RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET ANDI e1 GUTTERLINE BACK OF CURB. TOP ELEVATIONS OF THE FRAMING SHOULD MATC THE TOP OF THE CURB ON THE STREET SIDE AND THE TOP OF THE RAI r GUARDIAN TURRET ON THE BIORETENTION SIDE SMSPECIF ' %I_7I_-17- 7Z1�7 5" 1•3.5' 1'-1.7 BASIN BOTTOM i � +'-D 1. INSTALL EXPANSION/CONTRACTION JOINT MATERIAL OR A SHEETOF1 SITE SPECIFIC 10.5• PRIMARY I POLY TO SERVE AS A BOND BREAK BETWEEN RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET 5.5' REMOVABLE E✓ OUTLET FILTER WALL AND CONCRETE INLET BEFORE POURING INLET S. SIDE CURBS OF THE POURED INLET MUST HAVE A INSURMOUNTABLE PROFILE TO PREVENT WATER FLOW FRO CLASS 5 AGGREGATE ELEVATION MEW N OVERTOPPING THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE INLET.I 1. THE TOP OF THE CLASS 5 BASE (COMPACTED TO 95 STANDARD PROCTOR) IS PRECISELY 1.4" BELOW THE 6. REMOVABLE FILTER WALL SHOULD BE INSTALLED WITH FILTE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION) FABRIC ON THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET. SUBSOILS ► RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET REVISIONHISTOR — - - DEVELOPED BY: W 0 o� -SC N r AK*IC SERVATE �� '' PRETREATMENT CHAMBER 1'n- 11p;4JRR DIAN B I O R E T E N T I O N PONDING DEPTH : 1 MANUFACTURED BY. _ PRETREATW TOR BIORHOMON TYPICAL DETAILns S toneworks � ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST/CAST STONE ; �� Rain Gardens • $wales •Filtration Basins • Infiltration Ban U.S. PA Noel E,SD1 16 AND S,SES www.RainGuardian.biz "W'�`° c�ts`run" 'w. "ATO Z O O OO U 0 W } U) > WZ ~LLJ 0 U � D_2i W of U, W 0 0 m W of w O 0 � U W N N N 0 c9 rn co N 0 0 0 co2 2 o 0 O CNJ N 2 2 U Q o Q LJJ O LI) I z U W N Lu 0 0 O O Lu LU co O 0 N 00 4 i J— L u m O U op O m m D W O u 2 Z Z YU- O L:IjU Z U Q W 12 2 J 0 0 0 U 0 u- � U O „ L C O 0 -j J � � J O0. L E aEE c �10 C) L 0- m- N }' O CL L Q U) •0 U).0 U) O O O CTS 0 N N M O 00 O M LT) ,zt LT) ,zt Z 00 �0? N of O N Cf) LU W Y� U U r` W > Lu mX C� u) I-- Li - LU` (D z—j WN ZEQ N 5- LLI � 00 WWZ (n Z)UZ ofN c0i)w0 LL(0 0-1Of (DF - Z>> pJ i Lu L/) Lu z Q LJJ O �z z U zQ Lu a cn O Lu LU U o 0 Lu 00 4 v, J— L u p[ O U op O z O u 2 SHEET NO. C12 STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT FOR WATERMAIN STUB PAINTED GREEN WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT FOR SANITARY AND/OR STORM SEWER STUB AND A MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST. POST SHALL BE BURIED 2' BELOW FINISHED GRADE WITH 4' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE (INCIDENTAL) z O F- 1'- 0" OR WIN BACK OF CURB W W O CONCRETE WALK OR � � BI BITUMINOUS PATH ARE LU HYDRAFINDER PRESENT (n W STEEL T -STYLE FLAG WATEROUS MODEL 67 HYDRANT W 0 Z U) U LU FENCE POST YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG U) — 0' - W LU w TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. (n U IZ m TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE AFTER BACK -FILL Q EXISTING OR FUTURE STREET BREAKOFF FLANGE Z_ O W = CURB OR GUTTER UNE w 1" TO 2" MAXIMUM �j �_ H STREET THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) ao ABOVE BURY UNE (FINISHED GRADE) I FINISHED GRADE a VALVE BOX AS WATERMAIN SPECIFIED 1 " TO 2" MEGALUG MEGALUG WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL. POLY Q Q' 0 i W � O U) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED GROUND LINE AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN s =� W Cl) N Cl) N Cl) N OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) o I x' PLUG '' O O O 4"x4" WOOD POST �4"x4" WOOD POST > z 2 LAYERS OF w 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 10' POLY (4 mil) v TYPICAL 00 O O � O O N O O 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF w TEE AND BEND BEND PLUG STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PR � z I UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH < "STEEL O �4"x4" WOOD POST STORM SEWER A MINIMUM OF 1 C.Y. OF 1 O o 1/4 VALVE BOX ADAPTOR 1-1/2" CLEAR STONE i = WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS T` MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. NOTES: LLI � Z ' N MAINLINE o OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG 1. THRUST BLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1/7 AND OVER. PIPE SIZE BEARING AREA N co O STORM SEWER WATERMAIN MEGALUG 6" 4.0 SQ FT 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE 6" 6.0 SQ FT WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 PSI. O N U LU N WATERMAIN GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2F 10" - 12" 12.0 SQ FT 3. THRUST BLOCKS BEARING AREA TO BE POURED 16" 20.0 SQ FT 0 O O N AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. GATE VALVE TEE 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE USED FOR 12" OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN ITARY SEWER GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE THRUST MEGALUG BLOCKING BLOCKING 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 FT. OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS m } ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER HYDRANT BELOW GATE THRUST PRECAST CONCRETE BASE VALVE BLOCKING m CID 0 LLQ LLJ J SMAJNLINE ANITARY SEWER AS SPECIFIED (15"x 15"x 4") BEHIND TEE z z Y ILL.O SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED in Q w >� J Q LU iY 2 EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 0 0 0 0 0 LL QO _ U04 0) 00 LO 0) ( E C: o 0�� J� J z : U) L _U � O Cw 0 J —J Title: Title: Title: - Title: Q E E Utility Stub Markers Typical Trench Compaction yp p Typical Hydrant Blocking for _ 0 o Standard Plate Library y Standard Plate Library y Standard Plate Library �� Installation Standard Plate Library �2 Waterman L 0 and Class B Bedding g City of Monticello Cit of Monticello y City of Monticello City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Date: 03-05 No. _ Date: Plate "°. Date: Plate No. 04-08 03-05 �� 2 0 01 2 0 0 2 O =� Revised: 03-17 Revised: 03-17 Revised: `_-- ` - - Revised:03-15 j =:- �� N 03-15 - o Q.Q iv U) IZ W 0 zN Cl) O 6C14 9) ♦^ % O U) / ` M — M Lf) � lf)� ♦^ �M N Q W � O N WH W Y� a Q U W� - Of mQ .� W F W ZW< Q'N O WN 00 LULWLIZ U)O W F- rQ1'� /�//�� Z N ?ZZ �M V V♦ U) W O LL O TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS 0 J_ � O ~ USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, MO ry�J� W �V Z>> OJ QUW �2 TOP TO BE 1/2 BELOW FINISHED GRADE STREET FINISHED GRADE BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND LINE TRACER WIRE SPLICE (n CURB BOX STANDPIPE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL w z COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE 2' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITYGAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET i POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET 4" PVC RSER FOR RESIDENTIAL VARIES 10' TO 20' TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT ` TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE CONTRACT , ^ i V I 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) J v LU / 1" COPPER WATERMAIN 1/8 1/8 BEND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT z U COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) z Q POLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG ^ + J TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT w I..L SANITARY SERVICEMAINLINE SANITARY SEWER `' V / O W PVC W U O HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) L•1� THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT ' ^ v I v U 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE J 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. J 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER UNE. O LU U co o z O U Title: Title: SHEET NO. Tracer Wire Sanitary Clean -Out Standard Plate Library (New Developments) _ Standard Plate Library Cit of Monticello City Cit of Monticello y Date: Plate No. Date: Plate No. 03-08 03-05 -� 3005 3005 -� 3006 Revised: Revised: 03-15 a N C CASTIN STANDARD FRAME & COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL zo z_ I O U � N N O F N z z z 0 WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II W U o }� z O x U g w 2 Y U } M m m ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ROADWAY SURFACE I SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 � FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS N z '^ 7 v / ` WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II 0 O m ¢ PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE N d 7 H} O ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD 8" CAST -IN-PLACE N m� PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP CONCRETE 0 0 OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE 4' TO 10' U CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION W Z J p�liU O � (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED w V 1 t � BY ENGINEER M O m �NNMM CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON �c/A� t� >in m I w OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE Ld w QLd AND PIPE CONNECTION STRUCTURE - 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O1 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. O3 MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT 4 EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MANHOLE MAY BE USED OR OR PLASTERED MANHOLE.,:.; CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH O5 GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY BASIN BASIN TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT - DIA DIA CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4001 A L - CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R -3067-V 4" CONCRETE COLLAR INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR MEN /Mn/// 43" ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) 6" 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4002 A PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ./ ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE COLLAR *15" 24" U) x *48" TYP aM A 35-1/4" 1 43" r CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA CRETEX TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" 6" OPENING 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION > *DIMENSION VARIES o BASED ON STRUCTURE m DIAMETER LV— RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 433B OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4003 TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS 5/8 FOR 18" TO 27" APRONS 3/4 FOR 30" & LARGER APRONS. I T- 6" MAX I6" ANCHOR TOP & BOTH ENDS NOTE: 1. ALL TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER MNDOT SPEC. 3392 & 3394. 2. APPLIES TO FLARED END SECTIONS 12" OR LARGER. 3. ALL NUTS AND BOLT ATTACHING TRASH GUARD TO THE FLARED END SECTION SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Trash Guard for End Section Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03-15 4007 J z O LU ° � ° U 0 cA w } > W � U of 0 � 2i W of U, W z 0 m W of W O 0 0_ U W o 0 0 N 0) O O O of zCNJ -i N 0 O CD U Q o H U) 07 W N 0 0co O N I xg�p � W � N z '^ 7 v / ` 0 O m ¢ Cl) U7 � U7 � N d 7 H} O m I n m O f N m� �nmmrnama�orno� J 0 0 U a W U N�� W Z J p�liU O � O w V 1 t � m O M O m �NNMM `�s. m • • • �c/A� t� >in m I w o Ld w QLd O '• ,_ 77 00 Og N ULL O j z 0 0 N II VO L M x 0 Ii O g � ?x aj Q o J J o 0 0 ooC g o z L.I --MM =a � U Q m ob° ob° ob° p p LO ~� a Q o o W xa p }� Z N O N Z m a-Z w J m O m N � Rko 7 d� N W a �M g w r 8 N W a Q Oi M N M U 0 �° OiQN m l� Oi O m 1� ° i gr V U W W= ' N mLd � W j M ¢ e; W N W y''g y - O Z K F o -1 ! J $ F W} NI G: W L = OZ U 7 X m N 1� O r1 Y x W 0 p W �L Q O(Om0 � W =� Yip j U N- O 0zi-Cn �O -• - D N SON W OIOY��t0 T�� x U M W 0 0 U0 tD tOa co p CL A N N w a yf¢ m � NNNMa W O a '<¢ j N II MWx, MW NII W a Z zo¢ a g ow �X g o nQ� n `gyp 0 N W O Of z~ O J ¢ ¢� >m,na<omMrnNa�l�<oa�om p � � }�O�m - ml�Of p � (n O N M Y In <O m Of M �O O M I� N n m Q W O O U � N N N M M Q I[ 1 Q QLd O Q _ xgap DO 0 jnd O� Z >' 't mM01 � �mm U 0' in (OOaO O N J W'.=' p N M< M t0 m W � M N ANN � C7 tON opOtO mN � ^��liU� [V --t L0 <O N II _� g ° NNNMM Q I � n �' Vo xa p � o (n Odd }�m0(Omm xaQ N W_ � W a p� ONNM�mtOm�M�00f U m IA m � Y ~ Z p ¢ Z W 7a ZNif7m��I�OtONm�OtONYO U Q MYOI �Y � p O a � N M Y�� t 0 1� Q Vj N CY K N_ z LL (n:5 O � zzw Z J It a � �NNM�mlam a wLd M O�NMIIa a¢ O Z U �w zo W W wm J L81 O z Title: Standard Plate Library Riprap Detail � City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 4009 Revised: 03-15 A L - CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R -3067-V 4" CONCRETE COLLAR INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR MEN /Mn/// 43" ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) 6" 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4002 A PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ./ ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE COLLAR *15" 24" U) x *48" TYP aM A 35-1/4" 1 43" r CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA CRETEX TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" 6" OPENING 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION > *DIMENSION VARIES o BASED ON STRUCTURE m DIAMETER LV— RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 433B OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4003 TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS 5/8 FOR 18" TO 27" APRONS 3/4 FOR 30" & LARGER APRONS. I T- 6" MAX I6" ANCHOR TOP & BOTH ENDS NOTE: 1. ALL TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER MNDOT SPEC. 3392 & 3394. 2. APPLIES TO FLARED END SECTIONS 12" OR LARGER. 3. ALL NUTS AND BOLT ATTACHING TRASH GUARD TO THE FLARED END SECTION SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Trash Guard for End Section Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03-15 4007 J z O LU ° � ° U 0 cA w } > W � U of 0 � 2i W of U, W z 0 m W of W O 0 0_ U W o 0 0 N 0) O O O of zCNJ -i N 0 O CD U Q o H U) 07 W N 0 0co O N I xg�p � W � N M O '^ 7 v / ` 0 O m ~ Cl) U7 � U7 � N d 7 H} i�anr�rnn<o m I n m O f N m� �nmmrnama�orno� m N� 0 0 0 W U N�� W Z J p�liU O � N N M 7 V 1 t � m O M O m �NNMM � N{ O �c/A� t� >in O v /r < c� w O M � n Q W N II O J 0 0 N II 0 0 Ii O L7 Q g o J J g o — (Y O � U Q x a p O U N p xa p }� t0 m� N O N <D m m �O m N m O m N � 7 d� N W a �M <It71�0i N W a O N U Oi M N M M�� OiQN m l� Oi O m 1� 00 UO W 1� 0� Z W j V,J F W} O m N 1� O r1 xg�p W ZJO�.-N(V M Q O(Om0 �MtOm � Yip j }NIf1 W SON W OIOY��t0 T�� Ol t0 t00f U0 tD tOa >N A N N � NNNMa W O O N II NII g LL g o `gyp O U >m,na<omMrnNa�l�<oa�om p � � }�O�m N� ml�Of Of � (n O N M Y In <O m Of M �O O M I� N n m Q W p� O U � N N N M M Q I[ 1 Q O Q _ xgap DO �. jnd O� Z >' 't mM01 � �mm � O>M in (OOaO O N J W'.=' p N M< M t0 m W � M N ANN � C7 tON opOtO mN � ^��liU� [V --t L0 <O N II _� g ° NNNMM Q I � n �' Vo xa p � o Odd }�m0(Omm xaQ p MOmmm00�01[1 � W a p� ONNM�mtOm�M�00f U m IA m � MI��Oi[1 N N M� Y p ¢ Z W 7a ZNif7m��I�OtONm�OtONYO fO Of MN MYOI �Y � p O a � N M Y�� t 0 1� Q K D_ A L - CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R -3067-V 4" CONCRETE COLLAR INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR MEN /Mn/// 43" ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) 6" 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4002 A PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ./ ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE COLLAR *15" 24" U) x *48" TYP aM A 35-1/4" 1 43" r CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA CRETEX TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" 6" OPENING 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION > *DIMENSION VARIES o BASED ON STRUCTURE m DIAMETER LV— RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 433B OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4003 TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS 5/8 FOR 18" TO 27" APRONS 3/4 FOR 30" & LARGER APRONS. I T- 6" MAX I6" ANCHOR TOP & BOTH ENDS NOTE: 1. ALL TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER MNDOT SPEC. 3392 & 3394. 2. APPLIES TO FLARED END SECTIONS 12" OR LARGER. 3. ALL NUTS AND BOLT ATTACHING TRASH GUARD TO THE FLARED END SECTION SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Trash Guard for End Section Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03-15 4007 J z O LU ° � ° U 0 cA w } > W � U of 0 � 2i W of U, W z 0 m W of W O 0 0_ U W o 0 0 N 0) O O O of zCNJ -i N 0 O CD U Q o H U) 07 W N 0 0co O N I I � W � N M O '^ 7 v / ` 0 O m ~ Cl) U7 � U7 � N d 7 H} O m I n m O f N m� 0 01 m N� 0 0 0 W U N�� 0 0 0 0 M O m N M M� Y U') U �c/A� t� >ZZ Z)OZ z v /r < c� w O M � n Q W N II O J 0 0 0 0 0 Ii O L7 Q g o J J W — (Y O � U Q x a p O z d ¢� } m N O m m< � f0 N � N W a O N U Oi M I� � N c0 � N M r: M 1 n Oi O m 1� 00 UO W 1� 0� Z W J � Q xg�p � �O W Ol W ZJON17at00] }NIf1 W SON W OIOY��t0 T�� Ol t0 t00f U0 tD tOa >N pU � NNNMa W O NII LL g o O p � � }�O�m N� ml�Of Of Nm�1nM (n � W a �a mrnMm W Ml�m NN01M01 W p� U � N N M I A I n I n I� m x O DO � xgap D' M� O W }m W �mm M01 tON opOtO mN � ^��liU� [V --t L0 <O OD Oi�tO _� NNNMM Q I � n �' � o UVo xaQ p � d m IA m M� IA O M M Y O W a �MIf1m�M fO Of MN MYOI �Y � � N M Y�� t 0 1� Q D_ � zzw a � �NNM�mlam _ O�NMIIa Oa A L - CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R -3067-V 4" CONCRETE COLLAR INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR MEN /Mn/// 43" ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) 6" 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4002 A PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ./ ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE COLLAR *15" 24" U) x *48" TYP aM A 35-1/4" 1 43" r CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA CRETEX TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" 6" OPENING 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION > *DIMENSION VARIES o BASED ON STRUCTURE m DIAMETER LV— RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 433B OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4003 TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS 5/8 FOR 18" TO 27" APRONS 3/4 FOR 30" & LARGER APRONS. I T- 6" MAX I6" ANCHOR TOP & BOTH ENDS NOTE: 1. ALL TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER MNDOT SPEC. 3392 & 3394. 2. APPLIES TO FLARED END SECTIONS 12" OR LARGER. 3. ALL NUTS AND BOLT ATTACHING TRASH GUARD TO THE FLARED END SECTION SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Trash Guard for End Section Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03-15 4007 J z O LU ° � ° U 0 cA w } > W � U of 0 � 2i W of U, W z 0 m W of W O 0 0_ U W o 0 0 N 0) O O O of zCNJ -i N 0 O CD U Q o H U) 07 W N 0 0co O N - U 0 O 0 „ L ( E C 0 0j J � � J CLQ QV m 0 . O � L (6 E E aE � c 0 L L QCU 0 0 •7 O Q) 0 zN I I � W � N M O '^ 7 v / ` 0 O m 2 Cl) U7 � U7 � Wz00 ♦^ 7:; 0? N � WCf) V J � O N co m 0 W U W r` — >U -I OU co wLL O"zJ z z Y O U �c/A� t� >ZZ Z)OZ z v /r < c� w O LL � -I- U Q W OJ 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 Ii - U 0 O 0 „ L ( E C 0 0j J � � J CLQ QV m 0 . O � L (6 E E aE � c 0 L L QCU 0 0 •7 O Q) 0 zN 00 W � N M O '^ 7 v / ` 0 O 2 Cl) U7 � U7 � Wz00 ♦^ 7:; 0? N � WCf) V J � O N W H w Y� Q U W r` — >U -I OU co wLL O"zJ Z�Q wN �N Q \/V♦♦ }WH Lu LU H00 (n �c/A� t� >ZZ Z)OZ ofN v /r < c� w O LL � -I- MO 06 0J- z>> �Uw OJ W -� SHEET NO. C14 W � z — 2 V J V) Q w O �z U zQ J •� — O w LU o ,U^ V 1 W O L7 " U J J W — (Y O U_ op O z O U 2 SHEET NO. C14 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY 12" 3/4 " / PER Fi 3" ;. :. HORIZONTAL .. ,.:•;.:•;.:• > ,/2 " R 1/2 " R 3.� ,.. . �. .. .... • ,CONCRETE AND GUTTER CURB CONTRACTION JOINTS a U 00 LLI > w 07 z 0 3" (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) 7. REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION o > w DIVIDER PLATE 3R 0 Ln U 2 2'- 0" i 1 6 1/2 . U) W LU MODIFIED DESIGN "D" .r, 3"R 3� . s" 13 1/2 " SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT EXPANSION JOINTS 7' O Z �j o m = H 5'- 0" TYPICAL STANDARD FRAME & BOX FOR 8618 CURB &GUTTER 1 OR ..: O SLOPE 3/4 -/Fr EXPANSION JOINTS B 6� UNE o o R (( Q p > W W' O (n MAI 2 m 6' A B 2% MAXIMUM OP CROSS SLOPE P R D D ! D n > ,n P2' 8 a • W M N O M N O M N O a .. Q. A. O 2H Y18 RI NT0 ZO AL LINE aMNDOTa • 0 � SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS � STANDARD PLATE N0. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0474 CU YDS / LIN FT (8612) 01010 M m ¢ CONCRETE TO BE POURED INTEGRALLY EXPANSION EXPANSION MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & B618 � MAY BE TILTED 8612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 21.1 FT CU. YDS. 8612 WITH CURB JOINTS A JOINTS 6 „ 6 > L.LJ O DIVIDER PLATE 3"R GUTTER (TYPICAL, SEE ABOVE) o O z N PLAN W 0 a , 1/2 . 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 G" 3"R 3V:.`:::r-:;;:<:::..::::;.. 1 SLOPE 0.06 Fi/Fi 6" 13 1/2 " SLOPE 3/4"/Fr PLAN 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') co 0 N U Q o p) LU O C) o N g•, o" N P c 2" MIN 2 7" 2 HORIZONTAL 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND UTTER G VARIABLE W/MI m m m p u1 LU J z z y- 0 a D D D LINE ,e / MNDOT STANDARD PLATE N0. 7100 H O SLOPE 0.06 FT FT NORMAL UNLESSJ /:L7"W ..: PER Fj N 4 .,�� 7" MIN. 7" �n 3� a nQ ui U z I-- (n Q W 0 W 2 � MATCH MODIFIED DESIGN "D" OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 C SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS p p p p LL U CURB & GUTTER (TYPICAL) -/ GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0582 CU YDS /LIN FT (6618) MAY BE TILTED 6618 CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER CONCRETE - 17.2 FT / CU.YDS. (6618) lz" 1 3` iTOTq�� Bsla 0" 3/4 " / PER FT 3" WIDTH VARIES 5 MIN. 18" WIDTH — 6' DEPTH — 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS 00 L � fV ° m 1/2 " R 1/2 " R — *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS 00 O 3" s SECTION B—B SECTION A—A GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH — 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 7v E c f NOTE: 7"� 10~ HORIZONTAL CONTRACTION JOINTS — 6' INTERVALS , 3 JC1 p U J Z STORM SEWER TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS INCLUDES A 0.10' DEPRESSION FROM THE PROPOSED GUTTER GRADE. THE CONCRETE CURB SHOULD BE TRANSITIONED FROM THE LINE �� _ _ _ _ _ _ EXPANSION JOINTS — 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM CL , >+ N U) PROPOSED GUTTER GRADE TO THE CASTING ELEVATION 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CENTER OF THE CASTING. 2'- 0" I "D" INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS - (0 � m a� C7 J MODIFIED DESIGN CURB & GUTTER - Title: Concrete Curb & Gutter Title: Concrete Curb & Gutter Title: Commercial Driveway Title: Typical Sidewalk O L cEo �- a) M o Standard Plate Library at Catch Basin Standard Plate Library for Streets Standard Plate Library Entrance Standard Plate Library City of Monticello City of Monticello City of Monticello City of Monticello a U " N ° o Date: 03-05 Plate No. 5012 Date: 03-05 Plate No. Date: 03-05 Plate No. Date: 03-05 Plate No. 5004 _= _ __ _ ==== 5 0 0 5 5008 Revised: 03-17 � �' Revised: Revised: Revised: _— _ _ 03-15 �` - - ---- 03-15 03-15 0 M M iv U) 0- � cn o zN Cl) O 6 N 9) ♦^ % O U) ` � M Lo'j- L0 � WZ00 ♦^ �� N Q W C�' O N CO W O BITUMINOUS TRAIL DESIGN a Q > mx � Q .. w V c� cn w OA - PATHWAY WIDTH 10 ft 0 �/ O z W Q �N B - SHOULDER WIDTH 1 ft MIN. 0 0 0 ♦♦^^ L}LIwZ U) 0? Q v♦ > z w � 'CO, 0 TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS / 11 U) � c5 Z U) 0 MATERIAL: ° pJ� O~ MM W � z>> o� Q— z M w 3#/FT ° ALUMINUM SHALL BE 5052—H38 OR 6061—T6 ALLOY. �UW 0 GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30" 3' TO 6' 0 ° .100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE OVER 30" ° 0 REFLECTING SHEETING SHALL BE DIAMOND GRADE. 3#/� © © ALL SIGNS CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR O 0 HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. 0 CHANNEL 4: 1 MAk 2.0 % POST SPECIFICATIONS GALVANIZED STEEL CHANNEL POSTS SHALL j 0 0 D BE USED, 2.5 LB/FT POSTS SHOULD BE 0 Z USED THAT ARE PUNCHED ON 1" CC. GALVANIZED POSTS SHALL BE OF THE J W Q 4' 0 O Mqk 0 4—RIB DESIGN. POSTS ARE TO BE 7 FEET z U IN HEIGHT BETWEEN BOTTOM OF SIGN AND FINISHED GROUND. z Q ,,.t_, ..;,:::,.•;.fit, BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS w 5 .� HARDWARE SHALL BE GRADE 5 W MINIMUM AND BE GALVANIZED (� O OR CADMIUM PLATED. W U O 3" SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) (� 6" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MODIFIED) O `J — /�� 12" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND RE COMPACT J `/ (SUBGRADE PREP) O FABRIC IF DIRECTED BY ENGINEER W NOTES: U m 1. TRAIL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO GENERAL L� O SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PLATES. 2. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET Z >- DOMES AND CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS. 3. MODIFY SURFACING, BASE, AND SUBGRADE DESIGN BASED ON NAME SIGNS ARE NOT INSTALLED O Lj U EXPECTED VEHICULAR USE AND SUBGRADE SOILS. C G Title: Title: SHEET NO. Typical Traffic Sign • Typical Trail Section Standard Plate Library Yp �2 Standard Plate Library Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 03-05 — ---- Revised: 5013 - _ - 5016 Revised: 03-17 03-15 j'C15 Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap Bedding Original Geotextile fabric g grade POBNT POANTO Ci Z �P I } ~ w(n SECTION B—B �� I. -U 0 Lu 0 (not t0 scale) EXISTING CURB 1► U Q OVERFLOW IS Yz OF (q W H LU Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates THE CURB BOX HEIGHT STAKE LU p U) LU O0000 0 STRAW OR WOOD FIBER J Z C m Original 0 6' TO 7' DIA . ROLL ENCLOSED IN PLASTIC OR POLYESTER NETTING >j W (n = Geotextile fabric SECTION A—A grade Q > (not to scale) 0 � o TYPE 2: BIOROLL DITCH CHECK PLAN USE ON ROUGH GRADED AREAS NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE Where the flow of water is sheeting, place sod strips LU N o N 0 Cl) 0 trapping device OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. ," X 2" X 18" LONG WOODEN STAKES AT perpendicular to the direction Q N N � N IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT 1' 0" SPACING MAXIMUM. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE Of water flow. Q (0M (0 (0OVERFLOW N BIOROLL AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH O O O OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM.BIOROLL PROVIDE 8" TO 10" OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH. SHINGLING SOD < OF W O �S / U URB FLOW 45' 8' 10' EMBEDMENT DEPTH \O VC) �� V z r N N co O I O U Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates �1 o N A A o A B o BIOROLL STAKING DETAIL Q / E C) 1 6 m Q o O j FILTER ASSEMBLY ENTRENCH A CO CO0 LU J o / o DIAMETER, MINIMUM ❑F 2' Z Z Y LL Q / 6" ON -GRADE LLI UI � U� Z j v ami 10" AT LOW POINT LU J / a_ / WHIGH-FLOW FABRIC Where the flow of water is 0 0 0 0 0 U_ 00 CD / L z B * FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN concentrated, place Sod stipS ~ 24 min. C/) CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. parallel to the direction Of O U ' 4 a) j Slope away from w / highway NOTEI OVERLAPPING SOD Water flow. o '0 �� WHEN MORE THAN 1 NOTE: io i= c 0 U / 50' BIOROLL/COMPOST LOG IS NEEDED, OVERLAP ENDS A Although pegging of sod is not specifically required it is understood that the a) S2 3 \ Z min. MINIMUM OF 6' AND STAKE contractor will be responsible for the successful establishment of the Sod including U v m : J — U) Match or Right of Way Existing repair or replacement of sod which becomes displaced or damaged due to lack of p p p g - � ci Grade PLAN protection or proper care. � o J a M �� Title: Commercial Gravel Title: Inlet Protection Title: Bio Log Staking Title: >1 L 0 o . Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance ALStandard Plate Library Catch Basin Insert Standard Plate Library Straw or Wood Bio RollL Standard Plate Library Sod Placement M �- o �C City of Monticello City of Monticello Date: Plate Nc. City of Monticello LA:—Q Cit of Monticello y L U �- M ._ Date: Plate No. Date: Plate No. Date: Plate No. 06-14 03-0� 03-08 03-0� ° o 1 - -- Revised: 6 0 0 4 _ 6 010 v) - E 0Q) Revised: 03-15 Revised: 03 Revised: j 03 -15 -15 03-15 0 Q 0-M - U) a- C/) o zN Cl) O U N UO / ` M M LID V Lf7 -'j- WZ 00 ♦^ �CD N Q LU N WO `° 10 WHW `� M 1. 0 p• CO X .. �20 U U) W 3.3' 3.3' ? Z Q Lu N W W Z U) °0 3.3' 33' . Z Z U) M o • • (n W c0 O C)_jD� "r__ 0.7 STAPLES PER $O. YO. 1.15 STAPLES PER $0. YO. 3.75 STARES PER $O. YO. Z>>OJ 006 J Lu �2 4:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES HIGH FLOW CHANNEL & SHORELINE l' ®Ujz ,B .......... .............. .............. ...... ,z' V� I O J ............. ........... :•::::.:::::•::::::. ::•:::..:::•::::•::::•:::::•. LU W Q ......... O :•:;•;::•:;;;:::;:::;;: ::::: ::::: :::..:.:: ::::::::.. 2 — U z Q J LU _ Q w ® 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED.. O 0 ` O LU V 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET INA F (15an) DEEP X *' (15an) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12' (30—) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES APPROXIMATELY 12- (30cn) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. — lU ^' BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STARING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 1x(30—) PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF W O STAPLESISTAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12- (30—) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. v 3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM. STAPLES/STAKES J — J O SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. Uj 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2'5' (5rm-12.Scm) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING l /Y'� V W 4- INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE O $' (7.5c.) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12- (30—) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. NOTE: 'IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN V (1&o ) MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. O }+ 2 Title: SHEET NO. Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library Stapling Patterns & Installation Installation Cit of Monticello City Date: Plate No. - 03-08 6011 1 Revised: o3-15 N \ \/' � S s / °sem r--- ----—---- \ /�----------- —pa a—Q, O w O Rim=942.48 T / � ` ` ` (n w tz S Inv.=9/4.58 \` / / ' ' ' 0 40' W � U (L' H Ln 0'- g // / \\ U) C) W \ ~ / '' -------------- SCALE: 1"=40' Z o m - - <' S 33943 =./ UL \ / K �— s\. / * • \ FES 36" CMP S - LEGEND: M M M Elev.- 932.55 / ' ` UJ 0 0 0 R'm=945.34 , %S i \ N N N N;1, V. S \ / \ S Q rn m / Rim=942.27 � / \ � Q N �i, Inv.=933.12 / Rim=9J6.91 \ / / \ / \ $ - Iim=A69J5.4/ / WHEEL TRACK r �' / \ // Rim=942.66 , \ 0 0 0 �\ � S N / / \ s S \ \\ Rim=943.17 / ! \ In v. �\ OVERHANG EXTENTS \ E" Soni. / Rim=9 36" \ v , \ NE Inv 94. N W o Q ° / // mInv. Stub (Vern Rim=94362 WW Inv. -9J4.20 t E Inv=934.20 HYDRANT EXTENTS o (/)wM v.=939.47 D67F ONN HYDRANT LOCATION } m Q LU 8" PVA SDR 35 Soni. \ Z Z Y JLL z 0 \ I SBL - Rouui < U U \ / Rim=942 57 -gh location of troll Q w _ > W Rim=946.34 1 7 i i i , \\ FES l8" CMP \ Ele v.• 958.62 % / / , , / , u 43.00 7.00 22.00 Aerial Fire Truck feet Width 8.50 Track 8.50 Lock to Lock Time 6.0 Steering Angle 33.3 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 i U O O N = c E C: /C a°i�J V U) O O O (a E E -O ac >,M��L •J -S m } co �' 0 Q ° c t m c 2 N 'U) p O � U) � C L C U) d C/) M Q zN n 0C14 LU Cl) rn U) z 5`z o 0 - M LO� W � Zw N Q N W H W Y� C) a Q U - W CO H1 LU 0-j ZwQ WN Q' 64 a- w LuZ W (n 00 F --N rQ1'� /c/p� V♦ > Z ?ZZ OM V 0 [L F- O0-10�OO~ ryV Z>>J QUWM � �H SHEET NO. C17 LU 5`z Q W p = z U W ~ W a- 1110 .� W cn O LU U o � O 0 U 10- J LU Q LUO U w Im O z O U SHEET NO. C17 = JKK �� ----- - T i / REGIONAL POND =943.33 / K �F. / \ E/ev.• 932.55 \ \ - Rim=942.27 `\Inv=933.12 Rim -942.66 NORTH INFIL. BASIN / P6 \ \\ Rim=943.17 100 -YEAR HWL: 946.20 ? \ Inv.=932.86 TREATMENT VOL.=726 C.F. / 946 ` \ �� Rim=943.62 /nv.=934.20 E v.E In=934.20 947 lnv.=939.47 S5 / EOF=946.50 \ \ // a p P5 8 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP g gq> o •0`, \ � � � 8" PVC SDR 35 San' gq). .946ggg�ggS 4, 9 :�• . \ \ �� ZD F/ AMAT (OR EQUAL)/ d `12,940 SQ. FT. (:ER.)• Rim=94o.G' \, \ s� \ \ -nv.=942.57 Rough locotio " \ Rim=946.34 � 9S0 DO !i�s Inv.=935.52 _ S 30" RCP -Rim =949.05 293 SQ. F\MP\�� lnv.-937.73 IFrn / 8,726 SQ. FT. (IMP.) I'll< PR(.POSED APARTME°IT (150 UNITS TOTAL) ply / °• / 20,208 SQ. FT. (IMP.)\ Q'I FFFc 1QT / EOF -955.80 FFFF967 00 9S� 00 `6 C.Y. OF CLl`.dS/ --961.002 RIP -RAP O 1,091 SQ. FT. (PER.) p d \ WEST INFIL. BASIN • 100 -YEAR HWL: 955.90 \ TREATMENT VOL.=5,329 C.F./ / o� � d• O / / O \ � FES /8CMP 12,193 SQ. FT. (PER.) " \ � � Elev. 959.0/ P4 0 56,411 SQ. FT. �/ d �. � � •1 56 � .�vv0 �O 12 C.Y. OF CLAS` 2 J RIP -RAP IN FOR�BAY .00° 10,381 SQ. FT. (IMP.) ` 2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 R P F ✓ / gss gss ss s K / \ � S4 sss gss / 10,895 SQ. FT. (PER.) 10,184 SQ. F I 7 \ \ S V • CENTRAL INFIL. BASIN", 252 SQ. FT. (PER..) f/%' 7,/ 863 SQ. FT. (PER.) (zl'_ 898 SQ. FT. (PER.) /./ I Ir -� l 431 SQ. FT. (PER.) _0�R n 12,925 SQ. FT. (IMP.) 46,900 SQ. FT. IMP. 6 46S q1 v�p( /) %�j o6 % q 1,091 SQ. FT. (PER.) R F �<<S T I ffjNG 6,900 SQ. FT. (IMP.) 1 /� J 9,579 SQ. FT. (PER.) s Rim=948.16 Inv. -933.79 i 6631 SQ. FT. (PER.) 1,487 SQ. FT. (PER.) 950 951 / 952 9Sq / 955' / 9s,6�� // / --66 .Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / 0 • ss / sss / IEOF=955.80 / P2 / 2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / EAST INFIL. BASIN 100 -YEAR HWL: 956.26 / / TREATMENT VOL.=1,952 C.F. / / /2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / / V^"\ '1-6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP V, "\ 240 SQ. FT. (PER.) / / / / SQ. FT. (PER.) / sec / / LEGEND: i7;=oo; foo PROPOSED RIP RAP E.Q.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW BUILDING 53,115 AREA TYPE BOUNDARY GRASS/PERVIOUS 91,035 SUBCATCHMENT BOUNDARY DRAINAGE NOTES: 0 40' SCALE: 1" = 40' GENERAL DESCRIPTION: THE MONTICELLO SUITES CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 -LEVEL APARTMENT WITH OUTDOOR AND INTERIOR PARKING. THE SITE IS 6.0 ACRES. THERE IS 117,009 S.F. OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT AND THE 2 BUILDINGS MAKE UP AN AREA AROUND 53,115 S.F. THE SITE ENTRANCES ARE LOCATED ON 7TH STREET WEST AND ELM STREET. SOILS AND INFILTRATION ACCORDING TO THE WEB SOIL SURVEY, THE EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS ON THE SITE IS A 20 INCH LAYER OF SANDY LOAM WITH GRAVELLY COARSE SAND. WITH EXCAVATING THE TOP LAYER OF SOIL, THE BASINS WILL INFILTRATE INTO THE COARSE SAND (HSG) A WITH AN ASSUMED INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR. A DOUBLE -RING INFILTROMETER TEST IS REQUIRED TO BE CONDUCTED BY A LICENSED SOIL SCIENTIST OR ENGINEER TO VERIFY INFILTRATION RATES OF EACH INFILTRATION BASIN AFTER BASINS HAVE BEEN GRADED. RATE CONTROL A REGIONAL POND HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR 7TH STREET WEST AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE EXISTING OUTLET B WAS DESIGNED TO UTILIZE A CN OF 89. THE FOLLOWING CURVE NUMBERS AND AREAS WERE USED TO VERIFY THE PROPOSED CN IS LESS THAN THE PREVIOUS CN DESIGN OF 89. TYPE AREA CN PAVEMENT 117,009 98 BUILDING 53,115 98 GRASS/PERVIOUS 91,035 61 TOTAL WEIGHTED 261,159 85 ALL STORM WATER IS DIRECTED TO THE STORM SEWER WITHIN 7TH STREET WEST TO OUTFLOW TO THE REGIONAL POND. 1525 HDYROCAD CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN DONE FOR THE PROPOSED SITE TO DETERMINE THE PEAK ELEVATIONS AND FLOW RATES OUT OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS. (CONTACT BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES FOR THE REPORT IF NEEDED.) THE PEAK ELEVATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS ARE LESS THAN 1 FOOT OVER THE EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS. EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS ARE ONLY UTILIZED FOR 100 -YEAR STORM EVENTS. WATER IS DIRECTED TO STORM SEWER MANHOLES BELOW THE OVERFLOWS. VOLUME RETENTION FOUR INFILTRATION BASINS ARE PROPOSED ON SITE TO PROVIDE VOLUME CONTROL FOR A 1.1 INCH STORM. WITH 170,124 S.F. OF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, 15,594 C.F. (577 C.Y.) OF VOLUME IS REQUIRED TO BE HELD WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASINS. THE COMBINED VOLUME OF THE BASINS TO THE INITIAL OUTLET IS 15,633 C.F. (579 C.Y.) THE FOLLOWING TABLE ADDS TOGETHER THE VOLUMES OF THE BASINS. WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. z O ~ w O ui U o } U) w LLI � U c/) � W w 0 z 0 w Ir w 0 N p o CDLO U o J O o O LU N ' CONTOUR AREA VOLUME BETWEEN CENTRALINFIL. BASIN N N 61 955 551 m 2 956 2499 1525 0 LLI 957 4582 3541 LLJY z 957:5 5661 2561. TOTAL: C9 L CO w L` 7626 "zJ ZQ � NORTH INFIL. BASIN � 945 307 � 2 J 946 1145 726 TOTAL: DJ> Zz �Uw OJ 726 Q WEST INFIL. BASIN U 953 982 954 2403 1693 L) w 955 3927 3165 Q 955.5 4727 2164 TOTAL: o�p 5329 EASTINFIL. BASIN O 954 187 O 955 1674 931 2 955.8 3267 1952 TOTAL: 1952 COMBINED VOLUME 15633 WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. z O ~ w O ui U o } U) w LLI � U c/) � W w 0 z 0 w Ir w 0 N p o CDLO U o J O o O LU N ' I �: 00 N N 61 m z Q m 2 M W200 ♦/� {/ /� m 0 LLI Cf) LU N W F_ LLJY z z Y O cD C9 L CO w L` z "zJ ZQ � wN �N � J_ Q W � 2 J 0 0 0 U 0 IL '7 -6 O ) N QQ-Oia 0 d u) (n 0 zN 00 N N 61 '^ 7 v / ` z Q 0 0 2 M W200 ♦/� {/ /� �� N Q Cf) LU N W F_ LLJY Q Q U W r2 mQ - C9 L CO w L` O "zJ ZQ � wN �N � LLI F_~ LLJ LU 00 � =UZ V)N V♦ cC/Iw0 Lr [L(D co r,- MO DJ> Zz �Uw OJ W Q LU L/) z z Q 2 1 J V) z Q w p LU �zz U zQ � w CD LU o � wo •� z cn 0 Q LU U O 0 L7 L) w J Q U_ o�p O z O 0 U 2 V) SHEET NO. C�:3 City P5 North/Infil Basin / / (i5 North West Infil Basin S4 Southwest Subcat Reach on Link P3 North City ewer S3 Northeast S1 Central Central Infil Basin P2 East Infil Basin S2 Southeast Proposed Stormwater Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Rainfall Events Listing Event# Event Name Storm Type Curve Mode Duration (hours) B/B Depth (inches) AMC 1 1.1 Inch MSE 24 -hr 3 Default 24.00 1 1.10 2 2 2 -Year MSE 24 -hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.79 2 3 10 -Year MSE 24 -hr 3 Default 24.00 1 4.11 2 4 100 -Year MSE 24 -hr 3 Default 24.00 1 6.63 2 Proposed Stormwater Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 2.090 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5) 2.686 98 Paved parking, HSG B (S1, S2, S3, S4) 1.219 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B (S1, S4, S5) 5.995 85 TOTAL AREA Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall= 1. 10 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Central Runoff = 1.67 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.080 af, Depth> 0.41" Routed to Pond P1 : Central Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Area (sf) CN Description 27,108 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 56,411 98 Paved parking, HSG B 18,645 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 102,164 91 Weighted Average 18,645 18.25% Pervious Area 83,519 81.75% Impervious Area 27,108 32.46% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, N 0 LL 01' 5 Subcatchment S1: Central Hydrograph MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Runoff Area=102,164 0 Runoff Volume=0.080 of Runoff Depth>0.41" Tc=8.0 m i n CN=91 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall= 1. 10 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment S2: Southeast Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth> 0.12" Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 12,925 98 Paved parking, HSG B 11,596 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 24,521 81 Weighted Average 11,596 47.29% Pervious Area 12,925 52.71% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S2: Southeast Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall= 1. 10 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment S3: Northeast Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth> 0.08" Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 20,382 98 Paved parking, HSG B 23,401 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 43,783 78 Weighted Average 23,401 53.45% Pervious Area 20,382 46.55% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, V! w V 3 0 LL Subcatchment S3: Northeast Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall= 1. 10 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment S4: Southwest Runoff = 0.51 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.027 af, Depth> 0.21" Routed to Pond P4 : West Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Area (sf) CN Description 17,281 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 27,291 98 Paved parking, HSG B 24,451 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 69,023 85 Weighted Average 24,451 35.42% Pervious Area 44,572 64.58% Impervious Area 17,281 38.77% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S4: Southwest Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall= 1. 10 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment S5: North Runoff = 0.01 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 0.002 af, Depth> 0.05" Routed to Pond P5 : North Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Area (sf) CN Description 8,726 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,940 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 21,666 76 Weighted Average 12,940 59.72% Pervious Area 8,726 40.28% Impervious Area 8,726 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S5: North Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Pond P1: Central Infil Basin Inflow Area = 2.345 ac, 81.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.41" for 1.1 Inch event Inflow = 1.67 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.080 of Outflow = 0.06 cfs @ 15.03 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af, Atten= 97%, Lag= 172.1 min Discarded = 0.06 cfs @ 15.03 hrs, Volume= 0.037 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 956.29' @ 15.03 hrs Surf.Area= 3,106 sf Storage= 2,341 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 230.9 min calculated for 0.037 of (46% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 160.2 min ( 956.6 - 796.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.00' 14,547 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 955.00 551 0 0 956.00 2,499 1,525 1,525 957.00 4,582 3,541 5,066 958.00 6,765 5,674 10,739 958.50 8,468 3,808 14,547 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 954.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 64.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 954.50'/ 954.25' S=0.0039'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 957.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 958.00' 15.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 955.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.06 cfs @ 15.03 hrs HW=956.29' (Free Discharge) t-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.06 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=955.00' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 0.77 cfs potential flow) t-2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=955.00' (Free Discharge) t-3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 N U Pond P1: Central Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Pond P2: East Infil Basin Inflow Area = 2.908 ac, 76.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.02" for 1.1 Inch event Inflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Outflow = 0.01 cfs @ 13.55 hrs, Volume= 0.005 af, Atten= 87%, Lag= 81.5 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 13.55 hrs, Volume= 0.005 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer 955.00 1,674 Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer 956.50 4,002 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 Device Routing hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 954.26' @ 13.55 hrs Surf.Area= 578 sf Storage= 101 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 117.0 min calculated for 0.005 of (95% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 99.8 min ( 939.0 - 839.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 954.00' 5,173 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 954.00 187 0 0 955.00 1,674 931 931 956.00 3,207 2,441 3,371 956.50 4,002 1,802 5,173 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 951.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 165.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 951.50'/ 945.25' S= 0.0379 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 955.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 955.80' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 954.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 13.55 hrs HW=954.26' (Free Discharge) L4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=954.00' (Free Discharge) 't--1 =Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 7.29 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=954.00' (Free Discharge) 't3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 0 0 0 0 N V � 3 0 0 LL 0 0 0 0 Pond P2: East Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Pond P3: North City Sewer Inflow Area = 3.913 ac, 68.53% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.02" for 1.1 Inch event Inflow = 0.06 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Primary = 0.06 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 0 0 0 N w 0 3 0 E 0 0 0 Pond P3: North City Sewer Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Pond P4: West Infil Basin Inflow Area = 1.585 ac, 64.58% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.21" for 1.1 Inch event Inflow = 0.51 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 13.71 hrs, Volume= 0.019 af, Atten= 94%, Lag= 92.3 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 13.71 hrs, Volume= 0.019 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P5 : North Infil Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.49' @ 13.71 hrs Surf.Area= 1,675 sf Storage= 648 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 206.4 min calculated for 0.019 of (70% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 138.3 min ( 958.1 - 819.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 953.00' 14,550 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 953.00 982 0 0 954.00 2,403 1,693 1,693 955.00 3,927 3,165 4,858 956.00 5,551 4,739 9,597 956.80 6,833 4,954 14,550 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 945.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 151.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 945.50'/ 942.50' S=0.0199'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 955.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 955.80' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 953.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 13.71 hrs HW=953.49' (Free Discharge) t-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=953.00' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 9.16 cfs potential flow) t-2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=953.00' (Free Discharge) t-3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Pond P4: West Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Summary for Pond P5: North Infil Basin Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 40.28% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.05" for 1.1 Inch event Inflow = 0.01 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 0.002 of Outflow = 0.01 cfs @ 13.33 hrs, Volume= 0.002 af, Atten= 54%, Lag= 58.4 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 13.33 hrs, Volume= 0.002 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 945.05' @ 13.33 hrs Surf.Area= 348 sf Storage= 16 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 29.0 min calculated for 0.002 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 22.2 min ( 898.6 - 876.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 945.00' 4,254 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.00 307 0 0 946.00 1,145 726 726 947.00 2,124 1,635 2,361 947.75 2,924 1,893 4,254 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 942.50' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 81.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 942.50'/ 941.75' S=0.0093'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Device 1 946.00' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 946.50' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 945.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 13.33 hrs HW=945.05' (Free Discharge) L4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=945.00' (Free Discharge) 't--1 =Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 8.89 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=945.00' (Free Discharge) 't3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 30 0 LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pond P5: North Infil Basin Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 1.1 Inch Rainfall=1.10" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Summary for Pond P6: City Sewer to Regional Basin Inflow Area = 5.995 ac, 65.14% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.01" for 1.1 Inch event Inflow = 0.06 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Primary = 0.06 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 0 0 0 N w 0 3 0 LL 0 0 0 Pond P6: City Sewer to Regional Basin Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Central Runoff = 7.16 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.353 af, Depth> 1.81" Routed to Pond P1 : Central Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Description 27,108 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 56,411 98 Paved parking, HSG B 18,645 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 102,164 91 Weighted Average 18,645 18.25% Pervious Area 83,519 81.75% Impervious Area 27,108 32.46% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S1: Central Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Summary for Subcatchment S2: Southeast Runoff = 1.08 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.052 af, Depth> 1.10" Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 12,925 98 Paved parking, HSG B 11,596 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 24,521 81 Weighted Average 11,596 47.29% Pervious Area 12,925 52.71% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, w 3 0 LL Subcatchment S2: Southeast Hydrograph MSE 24 -hr -3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Runoff Area=24,521 sf Runoff Volume=0.052 of Runoff Depth>1.10' Tc=8.0 m i n CN=81 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Subcatchment S3: Northeast Runoff = 1.62 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.078 af, Depth> 0.93" Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 20,382 98 Paved parking, HSG B 23,401 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 43,783 78 Weighted Average 23,401 53.45% Pervious Area 20,382 46.55% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S3: Northeast Hydrograph ❑ Runoff MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Runoff Area=43,783 sf Runoff Volume=0.078 of ,1 C Runoff Depth>0.93" LL I I 11A Tc=8.0 m i n CN=78 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Summary for Subcatchment S4: Southwest Runoff = 3.73 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.178 af, Depth> 1.35" Routed to Pond P4 : West Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Description 17,281 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 27,291 98 Paved parking, HSG B 24,451 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 69,023 85 Weighted Average 24,451 35.42% Pervious Area 44,572 64.58% Impervious Area 17,281 38.77% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S4: Southwest Hydrograph 4 F2 3 w a Z LL 1 MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Runoff Area=69,023 sf Runoff Volume=0.178 of Runoff Depth>1.35" Tc=8.0 m i n CN=85 1 ❑ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Subcatchment S5: North Runoff = 0.71 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Depth> 0.83" Routed to Pond P5 : North Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Description 8,726 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,940 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 21,666 76 Weighted Average 12,940 59.72% Pervious Area 8,726 40.28% Impervious Area 8,726 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S5: North Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Summary for Pond P1: Central Infil Basin Inflow Area = 2.345 ac, 81.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.81" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 7.16 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.353 of Outflow = 2.03 cfs @ 12.40 hrs, Volume= 0.183 af, Atten= 72%, Lag= 14.7 min Discarded = 0.11 cfs @ 12.40 hrs, Volume= 0.076 of Primary = 1.92 cfs @ 12.40 hrs, Volume= 0.107 of Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin 5,674 10,739 958.50 Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin 954.50' 12.0" Round Culvert Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 957.63' @ 12.40 hrs Surf.Area= 5,956 sf Storage= 8,382 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 134.2 min calculated for 0.183 of (52% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 72.7 min ( 844.5 - 771.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.00' 14,547 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 955.00 551 0 0 956.00 2,499 1,525 1,525 957.00 4,582 3,541 5,066 958.00 6,765 5,674 10,739 958.50 8,468 3,808 14,547 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 954.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 64.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 954.50'/ 954.25' S= 0.0039 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 957.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 958.00' 15.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 955.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.11 cfs @ 12.40 hrs HW=957.63' (Free Discharge) t-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.11 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.91 cfs @ 12.40 hrs HW=957.63' (Free Discharge) 't--1 =Culvert (Passes 1.91 cfs of 6.10 cfs potential flow) t-2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 1.91 cfs @ 1.17 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=955.00' (Free Discharge) t-3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Pond P1: Central Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Summary for Pond P2: East Infil Basin Inflow Area = 2.908 ac, 76.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.65" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.26 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 0.159 of Outflow = 1.72 cfs @ 12.53 hrs, Volume= 0.122 af, Atten= 24%, Lag= 8.6 min Discarded = 0.05 cfs @ 12.53 hrs, Volume= 0.029 of Primary = 1.67 cfs @ 12.53 hrs, Volume= 0.092 of Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer 955.00 1,674 Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer 956.50 4,002 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 955.62' @ 12.53 hrs Surf.Area= 2,621 sf Storage= 2,258 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 75.4 min calculated for 0.122 of (77% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 43.5 min ( 829.7 - 786.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 954.00' 5,173 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 954.00 187 0 0 955.00 1,674 931 931 956.00 3,207 2,441 3,371 956.50 4,002 1,802 5,173 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 951.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 165.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 951.50'/ 945.25' S= 0.0379 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 955.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 955.80' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 954.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.53 hrs HW=955.62' (Free Discharge) L4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.05 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.64 cfs @ 12.53 hrs HW=955.62' (Free Discharge) 't--1 =Culvert (Passes 1.64 cfs of 8.80 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 1.64 cfs @ 1.12 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=954.00' (Free Discharge) 't3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Pond P2: East Infil Basin Hydrograph ❑ Inflow 2 2s ors Outflow Inflow Area=2.908 ac ❑ Discarded ._......_......_......_...._......_......_..........._......_......_......r......_......_......_...;._......_........._ ❑ Primary Secondary Peak Elev=955.62' ° �2�ts Storage=2,258 cf 2 ,1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Summary for Pond P3: North City Sewer Inflow Area = 3.913 ac, 68.53% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.52" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.11 cfs @ 12.52 hrs, Volume= 0.170 of Primary = 2.11 cfs @ 12.52 hrs, Volume= 0.170 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 2 Pond P3: North City Sewer Hydrograph 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29 Summary for Pond P4: West Infil Basin Inflow Area = 1.585 ac, 64.58% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.35" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 3.73 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.178 of Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 15.17 hrs, Volume= 0.054 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 181.2 min Discarded = 0.08 cfs @ 15.17 hrs, Volume= 0.054 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin 6,833 Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P5 : North Infil Basin 12.0" Round Culvert Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 955.24' @ 15.17 hrs Surf.Area= 4,314 sf Storage= 5,841 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 237.3 min calculated for 0.053 of (30% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 165.5 min ( 951.8 - 786.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 953.00' 14,550 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 953.00 982 0 0 954.00 2,403 1,693 1,693 955.00 3,927 3,165 4,858 956.00 5,551 4,739 9,597 956.80 6,833 4,954 14,550 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 945.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 151.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 945.50'/ 942.50' S=0.0199'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 955.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 955.80' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 953.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.08 cfs @ 15.17 hrs HW=955.24' (Free Discharge) t-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.08 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=953.00' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 9.16 cfs potential flow) t-2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=953.00' (Free Discharge) t-3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30 3 0 LL Pond P4: West Infil Basin Hydrograph ❑ Inflow 3.73 cfs Outflow Inflow Area=1.585 ac ❑ Discarded ❑ Primary Peak Elev=955.24 ❑Secondary Storage=5,841 cf 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31 Summary for Pond P5: North Infil Basin Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 40.28% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.83" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.71 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.034 of Outflow = 0.13 cfs @ 12.60 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Atten= 81 %, Lag= 26.5 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.60 hrs, Volume= 0.014 of Primary = 0.11 cfs @ 12.60 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin 946.00 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 946.02' @ 12.60 hrs Surf.Area= 1,164 sf Storage= 748 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 167.5 min calculated for 0.020 of (59% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 98.6 min ( 902.8 - 804.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 945.00' 4,254 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.00 307 0 0 946.00 1,145 726 726 947.00 2,124 1,635 2,361 947.75 2,924 1,893 4,254 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 942.50' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 81.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 942.50'/ 941.75' S=0.0093'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Device 1 946.00' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 946.50' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 945.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.60 hrs HW=946.02' (Free Discharge) L4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.11 cfs @ 12.60 hrs HW=946.02' (Free Discharge) 't--1 =Culvert (Passes 0.11 cfs of 10.93 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.11 cfs @ 0.45 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=945.00' (Free Discharge) 't3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32 Pond P5: North Infil Basin Hydrograph ...... _... ❑ Inflow ......_ _ _, _ _...... _ , ............ . .. 0.71 ds OUffIOW w 3 0 LL 0.75- 0.7- 0.65-- 0.6 .750.70.650.6 0.55- 0.5- 0.45: .550.50.45 0.4- 0.35-: 0.3 0.25 0.2 ME 0.1 Inflow Area=0.497 ac - ■ Discarded ■ Primary Peak Elev=946.02 Secondary Storage=748 cf - 0.13 ds 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.79" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 33 Summary for Pond P6: City Sewer to Regional Basin Inflow Area = 5.995 ac, 65.14% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.35" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.08 cfs @ 12.53 hrs, Volume= 0.177 of Primary = 2.08 cfs @ 12.53 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 2 Pond P6: City Sewer to Regional Basin Hydrograph 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 34 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Central Runoff = 11.61 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.589 af, Depth> 3.02" Routed to Pond P1 : Central Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11" Area (sf) CN Description 27,108 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 56,411 98 Paved parking, HSG B 18,645 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 102,164 91 Weighted Average 18,645 18.25% Pervious Area 83,519 81.75% Impervious Area 27,108 32.46% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, N w V 3 0 LL Subcatchment S1: Central Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35 Summary for Subcatchment S2: Southeast Runoff = 2.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.099 af, Depth> 2.12" Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 12,925 98 Paved parking, HSG B 11,596 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 24,521 81 Weighted Average 11,596 47.29% Pervious Area 12,925 52.71% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, N w V 3 0 LL Subcatchment S2: Southeast Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 36 Summary for Subcatchment S3: Northeast Runoff = 3.31 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.158 af, Depth> 1.89" Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 20,382 98 Paved parking, HSG B 23,401 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 43,783 78 Weighted Average 23,401 53.45% Pervious Area 20,382 46.55% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S3: Northeast Hydrograph MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11" Runoff Area=43,783 sf Runoff Volume=0.158 of Runoff Depth>1.89" Tc=8.0 m i n CN=78 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff C 3 N v 2 3 0 LL 1 MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11" Runoff Area=43,783 sf Runoff Volume=0.158 of Runoff Depth>1.89" Tc=8.0 m i n CN=78 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 37 Summary for Subcatchment S4: Southwest Runoff = 6.66 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.324 af, Depth> 2.46" Routed to Pond P4 : West Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11" Area (sf) CN Description 17,281 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 27,291 98 Paved parking, HSG B 24,451 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 69,023 85 Weighted Average 24,451 35.42% Pervious Area 44,572 64.58% Impervious Area 17,281 38.77% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S4: Southwest 1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 38 Summary for Subcatchment S5: North Runoff = 1.51 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.072 af, Depth> 1.74" Routed to Pond P5 : North Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11" Area (sf) CN Description 8,726 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,940 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 21,666 76 Weighted Average 12,940 59.72% Pervious Area 8,726 40.28% Impervious Area 8,726 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, w 3 0 LL 1 01' 5 Subcatchment S5: North Hydrograph MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11" Runoff Area=21,666 sf Runoff Volume=0.072'af Runoff Depth>1.74" Tc=8.0 m i n CN=76 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 39 Summary for Pond P1: Central Infil Basin Inflow Area = 2.345 ac, 81.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.02" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 11.61 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.589 of Outflow = 6.63 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 0.414 af, Atten= 43%, Lag= 6.4 min Discarded = 0.12 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 0.083 of Primary = 6.51 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 0.331 of Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 957.96' @ 12.26 hrs Surf.Area= 6,669 sf Storage= 10,443 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 89.4 min calculated for 0.414 of (70% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 37.7 min ( 800.7 - 763.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.00' 14,547 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 955.00 551 0 0 956.00 2,499 1,525 1,525 957.00 4,582 3,541 5,066 958.00 6,765 5,674 10,739 958.50 8,468 3,808 14,547 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 954.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 64.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 954.50'/ 954.25' S=0.0039'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 957.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 958.00' 15.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 955.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.12 cfs @ 12.26 hrs HW=957.95' (Free Discharge) t-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.12 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=6.50 cfs @ 12.26 hrs HW=957.95' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 6.50 cfs @ 8.28 fps) t-2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 6.50 cfs of 12.51 cfs potential flow) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=955.00' (Free Discharge) t-3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 40 Pond P1: Central Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 41 Summary for Pond P2: East Infil Basin Inflow Area = 2.908 ac, 76.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.78" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 9.00 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.430 of Outflow = 8.02 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.387 af, Atten= 11 %, Lag= 3.9 min Discarded = 0.05 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.032 of Primary = 7.82 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.353 of Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer Secondary = 0.14 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.001 of Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 955.83' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 2,948 sf Storage= 2,851 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 33.5 min calculated for 0.387 of (90% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 10.6 min ( 787.0 - 776.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 954.00' 5,173 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 954.00 187 0 0 955.00 1,674 931 931 956.00 3,207 2,441 3,371 956.50 4,002 1,802 5,173 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 951.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 165.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 951.50'/ 945.25' S= 0.0379 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 955.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 955.80' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 954.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=955.83' (Free Discharge) L4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.05 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=7.77 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=955.83' (Free Discharge) 't--1 =Culvert (Passes 7.77 cfs of 8.90 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 7.77 cfs @ 1.88 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.13 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=955.83' (Free Discharge) 't3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF (Weir Controls 0.13 cfs @ 0.43 fps) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 42 Pond P2: East Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 43 Summary for Pond P3: North City Sewer Inflow Area = 3.913 ac, 68.53% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.57" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 11.22 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.513 of Primary = 11.22 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.513 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond P3: North City Sewer Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 44 Summary for Pond P4: West Infil Basin Inflow Area = 1.585 ac, 64.58% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.46" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 6.66 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.324 of Outflow = 1.83 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 0.165 af, Atten= 72%, Lag= 15.5 min Discarded = 0.09 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 0.064 of Primary = 1.74 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 0.102 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P5 : North Infil Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 955.62' @ 12.41 hrs Surf.Area= 4,936 sf Storage= 7,612 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 130.8 min calculated for 0.165 of (51 % of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 68.5 min ( 845.0 - 776.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 953.00' 14,550 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 953.00 982 0 0 954.00 2,403 1,693 1,693 955.00 3,927 3,165 4,858 956.00 5,551 4,739 9,597 956.80 6,833 4,954 14,550 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 945.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 151.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 945.50'/ 942.50' S=0.0199'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 955.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 955.80' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 953.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.09 cfs @ 12.41 hrs HW=955.62' (Free Discharge) t-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.09 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.72 cfs @ 12.41 hrs HW=955.62' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Passes 1.72 cfs of 10.35 cfs potential flow) t-2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 1.72 cfs @ 1.13 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=953.00' (Free Discharge) t-3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 45 Pond P4: West Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 46 Summary for Pond P5: North Infil Basin Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 40.28% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.74" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 1.51 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.072 of Outflow = 1.53 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.056 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 3.1 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.015 of Primary = 1.51 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.041 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 946.11' @ 12.21 hrs Surf.Area= 1,253 sf Storage= 858 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 76.9 min calculated for 0.055 of (77% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 26.0 min ( 817.7 - 791.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 945.00' 4,254 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.00 307 0 0 946.00 1,145 726 726 947.00 2,124 1,635 2,361 947.75 2,924 1,893 4,254 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 942.50' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 81.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 942.50'/ 941.75' S=0.0093'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Device 1 946.00' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 946.50' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 945.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.21 hrs HW=946.10' (Free Discharge) L4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.40 cfs @ 12.21 hrs HW=946.10' (Free Discharge) 't--1 =Culvert (Passes 1.40 cfs of 11.08 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 1.40 cfs @ 1.06 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=945.00' (Free Discharge) 't3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 47 Pond P5: North Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.11 " Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 48 Summary for Pond P6: City Sewer to Regional Basin Inflow Area = 5.995 ac, 65.14% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.31" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 12.69 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.655 of Primary = 12.69 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.655 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs N w V 3 0 LL Pond P6: City Sewer to Regional Basin Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 49 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Central Runoff = 19.99 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 1.055 af, Depth> 5.40" Routed to Pond P1 : Central Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Area (sf) CN Description 27,108 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 56,411 98 Paved parking, HSG B 18,645 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 102,164 91 Weighted Average 18,645 18.25% Pervious Area 83,519 81.75% Impervious Area 27,108 32.46% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, N w V 3 0 LL Subcatchment S1: Central Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 50 Summary for Subcatchment S2: Southeast Runoff = 4.09 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.202 af, Depth> 4.30" Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 12,925 98 Paved parking, HSG B 11,596 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 24,521 81 Weighted Average 11,596 47.29% Pervious Area 12,925 52.71% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, 4- 3- 0 30 LL 2 1 Subcatchment S2: Southeast Hydrograph MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Runoff Area=24,521 sf Runoff Volume=0.202 of Runoff Depth>4.30" Tc=8.0 m i n CN=81 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 51 Summary for Subcatchment S3: Northeast Runoff = 6.84 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.333 af, Depth> 3.98" Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 20,382 98 Paved parking, HSG B 23,401 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 43,783 78 Weighted Average 23,401 53.45% Pervious Area 20,382 46.55% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, N w V 3 0 LL Subcatchment S3: Northeast Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 52 Summary for Subcatchment S4: Southwest Runoff = 12.39 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.624 af, Depth> 4.73" Routed to Pond P4 : West Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Area (sf) CN Description 17,281 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 27,291 98 Paved parking, HSG B 24,451 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 69,023 85 Weighted Average 24,451 35.42% Pervious Area 44,572 64.58% Impervious Area 17,281 38.77% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S4: Southwest Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 53 Summary for Subcatchment S5: North Runoff = 3.23 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.156 af, Depth> 3.77" Routed to Pond P5 : North Infil Basin Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Area (sf) CN Description 8,726 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,940 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 21,666 76 Weighted Average 12,940 59.72% Pervious Area 8,726 40.28% Impervious Area 8,726 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, N w V 3 0 LL Subcatchment S5: North Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 54 Summary for Pond P1: Central Infil Basin Inflow Area = 2.345 ac, 81.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.40" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 19.99 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 1.055 of Outflow = 16.38 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.878 af, Atten= 18%, Lag= 3.6 min Discarded = 0.15 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Primary = 6.99 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.647 of Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Secondary = 9.25 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.135 of Routed to Pond P2 : East Infil Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 958.37' @ 12.21 hrs Surf.Area= 8,022 sf Storage= 13,468 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 70.5 min calculated for 0.878 of (83% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 29.9 min ( 782.9 - 752.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.00' 14,547 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 955.00 551 0 0 956.00 2,499 1,525 1,525 957.00 4,582 3,541 5,066 958.00 6,765 5,674 10,739 958.50 8,468 3,808 14,547 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 954.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 64.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 954.50'/ 954.25' S=0.0039'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 957.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 958.00' 15.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 955.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.15 cfs @ 12.21 hrs HW=958.36' (Free Discharge) t-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.15 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=6.98 cfs @ 12.21 hrs HW=958.36' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 6.98 cfs @ 8.88 fps) t-2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 6.98 cfs of 32.82 cfs potential flow) Secondary OutFlow Max=8.93 cfs @ 12.21 hrs HW=958.36' (Free Discharge) t-3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF (Weir Controls 8.93 cfs @ 1.50 fps) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 55 N V Pond P1: Central Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 56 Summary for Pond P2: East Infil Basin Inflow Area = 2.908 ac, 76.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.06" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 19.59 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.984 of Outflow = 18.40 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.939 af, Atten= 6%, Lag= 2.2 min Discarded = 0.07 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.036 of Primary = 9.09 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.762 of Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer 955.00 1,674 Secondary = 9.24 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.141 of Routed to Pond P3 : North City Sewer 956.50 4,002 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 956.26' @ 12.23 hrs Surf.Area= 3,618 sf Storage= 4,253 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 21.5 min calculated for 0.939 of (95% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 6.2 min ( 778.8 - 772.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 954.00' 5,173 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 954.00 187 0 0 955.00 1,674 931 931 956.00 3,207 2,441 3,371 956.50 4,002 1,802 5,173 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 951.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 165.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 951.50'/ 945.25' S= 0.0379 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 955.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 955.80' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 954.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.07 cfs @ 12.23 hrs HW=956.25' (Free Discharge) L4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.07 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=9.09 cfs @ 12.23 hrs HW=956.25' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 9.09 cfs @ 11.57 fps) L2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 9.09 cfs of 26.54 cfs potential flow) Secondary OutFlow Max=8.87 cfs @ 12.23 hrs HW=956.25' (Free Discharge) 't3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF (Weir Controls 8.87 cfs @ 1.68 fps) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 57 N w V Pond P2: East Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 58 Summary for Pond P3: North City Sewer Inflow Area = 3.913 ac, 68.53% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.79" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 23.43 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 1.236 of Primary = 23.43 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 1.236 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond P3: North City Sewer Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 59 Summary for Pond P4: West Infil Basin Inflow Area = 1.585 ac, 64.58% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.73" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 12.39 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.624 of Outflow = 11.08 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.462 af, Atten= 11 %, Lag= 2.5 min Discarded = 0.10 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.071 of Primary = 10.15 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.384 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin Secondary = 0.84 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Routed to Pond P5 : North Infil Basin Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 955.90' @ 12.19 hrs Surf.Area= 5,391 sf Storage= 9,057 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 80.7 min calculated for 0.462 of (74% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 31.3 min ( 796.6 - 765.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 953.00' 14,550 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 953.00 982 0 0 954.00 2,403 1,693 1,693 955.00 3,927 3,165 4,858 956.00 5,551 4,739 9,597 956.80 6,833 4,954 14,550 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 945.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 151.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 945.50'/ 942.50' S=0.0199'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 955.50' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 955.80' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 953.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.10 cfs @ 12.19 hrs HW=955.90' (Free Discharge) t-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.10 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=10.26 cfs @ 12.19 hrs HW=955.90' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Passes 10.26 cfs of 10.47 cfs potential flow) t-2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 10.26 cfs @ 2.06 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 12.19 hrs HW=955.90' (Free Discharge) t-3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF (Weir Controls 0.78 cfs @ 0.77 fps) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 @2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 60 Pond P4: West Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 61 Summary for Pond P5: North Infil Basin Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 40.28% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.94" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 3.83 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.163 of Outflow = 3.78 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 1.1 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.017 of Primary = 3.75 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.130 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond P6 : City Sewer to Regional Basin 946.00 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 946.20' @ 12.19 hrs Surf.Area= 1,344 sf Storage= 978 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 43.1 min calculated for 0.147 of (90% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 12.0 min ( 789.0 - 777.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 945.00' 4,254 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.00 307 0 0 946.00 1,145 726 726 947.00 2,124 1,635 2,361 947.75 2,924 1,893 4,254 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 942.50' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 81.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 942.50'/ 941.75' S=0.0093'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Device 1 946.00' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 946.50' 10.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #4 Discarded 945.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.19 hrs HW=946.20' (Free Discharge) L4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=3.61 cfs @ 12.19 hrs HW=946.20' (Free Discharge) 't--1 =Culvert (Passes 3.61 cfs of 11.25 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 3.61 cfs @ 1.45 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=945.00' (Free Discharge) 't3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 62 Pond P5: North Infil Basin Hydrograph Time (hours) Proposed Stormwater MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.63" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 9/15/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-2q s/n 02380 © 2022 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 63 Summary for Pond P6: City Sewer to Regional Basin Inflow Area = 5.995 ac, 65.14% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.50" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 37.10 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 1.751 of Primary = 37.10 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 1.751 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs N w V 3 0 LL Pond P6: City Sewer to Regional Basin Hydrograph 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary USDA United States Department of Agriculture I V RCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota — IF ft.-- kAumb—" Y it I� �7 r+ I� August 14, 2023 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nres142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface.................................................................................................................... 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8 SoilMap................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 MapUnit Legend................................................................................................ 11 MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Wright County, Minnesota...............................................................................13 260—Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes..........................................13 406—Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ......................................... 14 1030—Pits, gravel-Udipsamments complex ............................................... 16 1377B—Dorset-Two Inlets complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes ......................... 17 1377E—Dorset-Two Inlets complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes.....................18 D67A—Hubbard loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes ................................... 20 References............................................................................................................ 23 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and 0 Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 0 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 436590 436660 436730 436800 436870 436940 1030 D67A' �h _ 1 45o 17 57N - 436310 436380 436450 436520 436590 436660 3 in Map Scale: 1:3,340 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet Meters m N 0 45 90 180 270 Feet 0 150 300 600 900 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge dcs: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 9 436730 436800 436870 45° 17 57 N 436940 437010 3 rn 3 M 437010 45o 18' 12" N fa . o � 45° 17 57 N 436940 437010 3 rn MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) 0 Area of Interest (AOI) Soils 0 Soil Map Unit Polygons im 0 Soil Map Unit Lines ■ Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit .4 Gravelly Spot 0 Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp + Mine or Quarry Water Features Miscellaneous Water scale. Perennial Water Streams and Canals Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Transportation Sandy Spot �}} Severely Eroded Spot measurements. Sinkhole Interstate Highways Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Custom Soil Resource Report MAP INFORMATION A Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Wet Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Other misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil .- Special Line Features line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed Water Features scale. - Streams and Canals Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map �}} Rails measurements. Interstate Highways Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service US Routes Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Major Roads Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts Background distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. 10 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 6, 2022 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 29, 2020—Sep 5, 2020 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it 11 Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 260 406 Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 9.8 32.1 16.7% Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 54.5% 1030 Pits, gravel-Udipsamments complex 0.9 1.5% 13776 Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 5.0 8.4% 1377E Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes 4.8 8.2% D67A Hubbard loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 6.3 10.7% Totals for Area of Interest 58.9 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it 11 Custom Soil Resource Report was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Wright County, Minnesota 260—Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2w0lx Elevation: 660 to 1,710 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 48 degrees F Frost -free period: 120 to 170 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Duelm and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Duelm Setting Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 10 inches: loamy sand A - 10 to 16 inches: loamy sand Bw - 16 to 26 inches: sand C - 26 to 79 inches: coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (6.00 to 20.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 30 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R057XY013MN - Loamy Overflow Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Low AWC, Acid (G091AN008MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Low AWC, Acid (G091AN008MN) Hydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Glendorado Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Low AWC, Acid (G091AN007MN) Hydric soil rating: No Isan Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Swales Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Low AWC, Acid (G091AN007MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Hubbard Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Hillslopes Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091AN022MN) Hydric soil rating: No Isan, frequently ponded Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Depressions Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: Not Suited (G091AN024MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes 406—Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2wOm2 Elevation: 660 to 1,710 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 48 degrees F Frost -free period: 120 to 170 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Dorset and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. 14 Custom Soil Resource Report Description of Dorset Setting Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 11 inches: sandy loam Bt - 11 to 20 inches: sandy loam 2Bk - 20 to 38 inches: gravelly coarse sand 2C - 38 to 79 inches: gravelly coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R057XY011 MN -Sandy Prairie Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091AN002MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Corliss Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091AN022MN) Hydric soil rating: No Oylen Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Forada Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Swales Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral (G091AN003MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Forada, occasionally ponded Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Depressions Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral (G091AN003MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes 1030—Pits, gravel-Udipsamments complex Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: gln9 Elevation: 850 to 1,160 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 155 to 200 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Pits, gravel: 80 percent Udipsamments and similar soils: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Pits, Gravel Setting Landform: Stream terraces, outwash plains, moraines Parent material: Sandy and gravelly outwash Description of Udipsamments Setting Landform: Stream terraces, outwash plains, moraines Parent material: Outwash Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 25 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None 16 Custom Soil Resource Report 13778—Dorset-Two Inlets complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: glqv Elevation: 850 to 1,150 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 155 to 200 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Dorset and similar soils: 70 percent Two inlets and similar soils: 20 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Dorset Setting Landform: Hills on outwash plains, hills on stream terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Parent material: Outwash Typical profile Ap,A - 0 to 11 inches: sandy loam Bt - 11 to 19 inches: sandy loam 2BC - 19 to 32 inches: gravelly loamy sand 2C - 32 to 80 inches: gravelly coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 6 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (2.00 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 30 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R057XY011 MN -Sandy Prairie Forage suitability group: Sandy (G091XN022MN) Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091XN022MN) 17 Custom Soil Resource Report Hydric soil rating: No Description of Two Inlets Setting Landform: Hills on outwash plains, hills on stream terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Down-slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Convex Parent material: Outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand Bt - 9 to 19 inches: gravelly loamy sand C - 19 to 80 inches: gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 6 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (6.00 to 20.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 30 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: F057XY018MN - Steep Sandy Upland Forest Forage suitability group: Sandy (G091XN022MN) Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091XN022MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Verndale, acid substratum Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Southhaven Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No 1377E—Dorset-Two Inlets complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: glqr 18 Custom Soil Resource Report Elevation: 850 to 1,120 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 155 to 200 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Dorset and similar soils: 50 percent Two inlets and similar soils: 40 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Dorset Setting Landform: Hills on outwash plains, hills on stream terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Parent material: Outwash Typical profile A - 0 to 9 inches: sandy loam Bt - 9 to 14 inches: coarse sandy loam 2BC - 14 to 27 inches: loamy sand 2C - 27 to 80 inches: gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 20 to 35 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (2.00 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 30 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R057XY011 MN -Sandy Prairie Forage suitability group: Not Suited (G091XN024MN) Other vegetative classification: Not Suited (G091XN024MN) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Two Inlets Setting Landform: Hills on outwash plains, hills on stream terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Down-slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Convex Parent material: Outwash 19 Custom Soil Resource Report Typical profile A - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand BE,Bt - 8 to 20 inches: loamy sand BC,C - 20 to 80 inches: gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 20 to 35 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (6.00 to 20.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 30 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: F057XY018MN - Steep Sandy Upland Forest Forage suitability group: Not Suited (G091XN024MN) Other vegetative classification: Not Suited (G091XN024MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Southhaven Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Verndale, acid substratum Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No D67A—Hubbard loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2wOmk Elevation: 660 to 1,710 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 48 degrees F Frost -free period: 120 to 170 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Hubbard and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent 20 Custom Soil Resource Report Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Hubbard Setting Landform: Flats, stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand AB - 8 to 20 inches: loamy sand Bw - 20 to 32 inches: loamy sand C - 32 to 79 inches: sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (6.00 to 59.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R057XY012MN - Sandy Prairie Forage suitability group: Sandy (G091AN022MN) Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091AN022MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Duelm Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Flats, stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Low AWC, Acid (G091AN008MN) Hydric soil rating: No Mosford Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Flats, stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091AN022MN) 21 Custom Soil Resource Report Hydric soil rating: No Glendorado Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Flats, stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Low AWC, Acid (G091AN007MN) Hydric soil rating: No Isan Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Swales, stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, dip Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Low AWC, Acid (G091AN007MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes 22 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www. nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nres142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 23 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid=nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290.pdf 24 Monticello Residential Suites Stormwater Treatment Facilities Operation and Maintenance Plan Monticello, MN September 2023 Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING 7GCLLOxuC1�?/Cid��,, ■ �['�a LAND SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signed: Christopher J. Dahn Date: 09/19/2023 License Number: 58628 Table of Contents I. Introduction....................................................................................................................1 II. Designation of Responsible Individuals.........................................................................1 III. Facilities to be Maintained.............................................................................................1 IV. Maintenance Activities...................................................................................................2 Figures • Figure 1: Site -wide Stormwater BMPs Attachments • Operation & Maintenance Checklist • Stormwater Management Plan • Erosion Control Plan Monticello Suites Stormwater Operation & Maintenance Plan Introduction I.A. Site Description The existing site is on the couth corner of Elm Street and 7th Street West, Monticello, MN. The area being developed is 6 acres. A 150 -unit apartment is proposed with interior and exterior parking. The site will be accessed through two entrances on the roads. The site slopes to the north. Four Infiltration basins are proposed to provide treatment volume for the site. Stormwater from large storms is directed to a regional pond to the north. Soils are coarse sand (Hydrologic Soil Group "A") II. Designation of Responsible Individuals Four infiltration basin facilities are located at the west, north, central, and east portion of the site. These, along with other the stormwater BMPS on site, will all be maintained by the owner. Maintenance shall be conducted by licensed professionals. II.A. Designated Contacts for Operation and Maintenance [Name, Title or Position] [Address] [Telephone] [Email] II.B. Off -Hours or Emergency Contact(s) This is expected to be the contractor(s) selected by the owners of the individual lots. III. Facilities to be Maintained III.A.Facility Descriptions Infiltration Basins o The civil plans will include specific information for each infiltration basin. See the attached Stormwater Control Plan Exhibit. General information includes: ■ Basins will infiltrate within 48 hours. ■ Slopes are 4:1. ■ Pond outflow is controlled by a skimmer structure. ■ Infiltration basin seed mix 22-261 shall be placed over uncompacted native soil. o Central Infiltration Basin ■ The central infiltration basin takes water from a portion of the apartment and garage and majority of the parking lot. Large storms will outflow through a skimmer directed into the east infiltration basin. o East Infiltration Basin ■ The east infiltration basin receives water from the southeast portion of the site and central basin overflow. Large storms will outflow through a skimmer Monticello Suites 1 of 4 Stormwater Operation & Maintenance Plan directed into the city storm sewer. o West Infiltration Basin ■ The west infiltration basin takes water from the west portion of the parking and south of the garage. It is the largest basin on site. Large storms will outflow through a skimmer directed into the north infiltration basin. o North Infiltration Basin ■ The east infiltration basin receives water from the north portion of the site and west basin overflow. Large storms will outflow through a skimmer directed into the city storm sewer. • Rain Guardian Turrets o There are five rain guardian turrets that act as pretreatment from the parking lot sheet flow into the infiltration basins. Sediment and debris are trapped and will need to be cleaned out. Storm Sewer o Storm sewer directs water to the west infiltration basin and out of the site to the city storm sewer. ■ Size ranges from 12" to 15" RCP. o Storm sewer sumps will trap sediment. There are two present on site. ■ North sump directed to the city sewer. ■ West sump directed to the west infiltration basin. 111.6. Facility Construction Details [To be added following construction] [Attach As -Built Drawings to Final O&M Plan] IV. Maintenance Activities IV.A. General Maintenance Rules At no time will synthetic pesticides or fertilizers be applied, nor will any soil amendments, other than aged compost mulch or sand/compost mix, be introduced. The top of soil surface will be maintained at or near the design elevation throughout. Irrigation systems will be maintained to conserve water while maintaining plant health. Although it is unlikely to be needed, if plants are not thriving compost tea may be applied at a recommended rate of 5 gallons mixed with 15 gallons of water per acre, up to once per year between March and June. Compost tea will not be applied when temperatures are below 50°F or above 90°F or when rain is forecast within the next 48 hours. The following may be applied for pest control if needed: • Beneficial nematodes • Safer® products • Neem oil IV.B. Maintenance Schedule The infiltration basin facilities will be maintained on the following schedule at a minimum. Monticello Suites 2 of 4 Stormwater Operation & Maintenance Plan IV.B.1. Routine Activities The facilities will be examined daily for visible trash during regular policing of the site, and trash will be removed. Any graffiti, vandalism, or other damage will be noted and addressed within 48 hours. The planted areas will be weeded by hand approximately monthly. At this time plants will be inspected for health and the irrigation system will be turned on manually and checked for any leaks or broken lines, misdirected spray patterns etc. Any dead plants will be replaced. IV.13.2. Following Significant Rain Events A significant rain event will be considered to be one that produces approximately a half- inch or more rainfall in a 24-hour period. Within 24 hours after each such event, the following will be conducted: The surface of the facility will be observed to confirm there is no ponding. If ponding occurs, the cause (potential causes include matting of vegetation or mulch on the surface, accumulation of fine sediment, or failure of the soil mix) will be investigated and remediated. • Inlets will be inspected, and any accumulations of trash or debris will be removed. • Storm sewer structures and sumps will be inspected, and any accumulations of trash or debris will be removed. • The surface of the mulch layer will be inspected for movement of material. Mulch will be replaced and raked smooth if needed. • Rain Guardian Turrets will have sediment and debris removed from the chamber with a shovel. The drop-in filter may be cleaned with a broom or hose. • Erosion control plan, storm water pollution prevention plan, and NPDES inspection requirements shall be followed. IV.B.3. Prior to the Start of the Rainy Season In September or each year, facility inlets and outlets will be inspected to confirm there is no accumulation of debris that would block flow. If not previously addressed during monthly maintenance, any growth and spread of plantings that blocks inlets or the movement of runoff across the surface of the facility will be cut back or removed. IV.B.4. Annually During Winter Once, in December — February of each year, vegetation will be cut back as needed, debris removed, and plants and mulch replaced as needed. The concrete work will be inspected for damage. The elevation of the top of soil and mulch layer will be confirmed to be consistent with the design elevation and with the design 6 -inch reservoir depth. Monticello Suites 3 of 4 Stormwater Operation & Maintenance Plan Key: 1-4: Infiltration Basins 5: Rain Guardian Turret 6: Storm manhole with sump 7: Storm sewer Monticello Suites 4 of 4 Stormwater Operation & Maintenance Plan D&7,9.w� 113mo7UN PS ]UNIiS TOTPL) fry 44 7. gSl P �E O 406 rrwuwc'amv Figure 1: Sitewide Stormwater BMPs Key: 1-4: Infiltration Basins 5: Rain Guardian Turret 6: Storm manhole with sump 7: Storm sewer Monticello Suites 4 of 4 Stormwater Operation & Maintenance Plan Project: Monticello Suites Location: Elm Street & 7th St W. Monticello MN Site Status: Date: Time: Inspector: Construction Sequence 1. Pre -Construction Pre -construction meeting Runoff diverted Soil permeability verified Groundwater / bedrock verified Project benchmark established Facility location staked out Temporary erosion and sediment control establish( 2. Excavation Size and location per plans Side slopes stable Depth adjusted to soil layer with specified soil type permeability Sub -soil not adjacent to excavation area and stabil with vegetation and/ or silt fence Stockpile location not adjacent to excavation area stabilized with vegetation and/ or silt fence 3. Filter Fabric Placement Fabric per specifications Fabric per specifications Placed per plan location 4. Aggregate Material Size as specified Clean /washed material Placed properly 5. Storm Sewer # Pipe size per plans Under -drain installed per plans Inlet installed per plans Pre-treatment devices installed per plans 6. Vegetation Complies with planting specifications Topsoil complies with composition and placement i specifications Permanent erosion control measures in place 7. Final Inspection Dimensions per plans Check dams operational Inlet / outlet operational Effective stand of vegetation and stabilization Contributing watershed stabilized before flow is roe to the facility Comments: Actions to be taken: = JKK �� ----- - T i / REGIONAL POND =943.33 / K �F. / \ E/ev.• 932.55 \ \ - Rim=942.27 `\Inv=933.12 Rim -942.66 NORTH INFIL. BASIN / P6 \ \\ Rim=943.17 100 -YEAR HWL: 946.20 ? \ Inv.=932.86 TREATMENT VOL.=726 C.F. / 946 ` \ �� Rim=943.62 /nv.=934.20 E v.E In=934.20 947 lnv.=939.47 S5 / EOF=946.50 \ \ // a p P5 8 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP g gq> o •0`, \ � � � 8" PVC SDR 35 San' gq). .946ggg�ggS 4, 9 :�• . \ \ �� ZD F/ AMAT (OR EQUAL)/ d `12,940 SQ. FT. (:ER.)• Rim=94o.G' \, \ s� \ \ -nv.=942.57 Rough locotio " \ Rim=946.34 � 9S0 DO !i�s Inv.=935.52 _ S 30" RCP -Rim =949.05 293 SQ. F\MP\�� lnv.-937.73 IFrn / 8,726 SQ. FT. (IMP.) I'll< PR(.POSED APARTME^IT (150 UNITS TOTAL) ply / °• / 20,208 SQ. FT. (IMP.)\ Q'I FFFc 1QT / EOF -955.80 FFFF967 00 9S� 00 `6 C.Y. OF CLl`.dS/ --961.002 RIP -RAP O 1,091 SQ. FT. (PER.) p d \ WEST INFIL. BASIN • 100 -YEAR HWL: 955.90 \ TREATMENT VOL.=5,329 C.F./ / o� � d• O / / O \ � FES /8CMP 12,193 SQ. FT. (PER.) " \ � � Elev. 959.0/ P4 0 56,411 SQ. FT. �/ d �. � � •1 56 � .�vv0 �O 12 C.Y. OF CLAS` 2 J RIP -RAP IN FOR�BAY .00° 10,381 SQ. FT. (IMP.) ` 2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 R P F ✓ / gss gss ss s K / \ � S4 sss gss / 10,895 SQ. FT. (PER.) 10,184 SQ. F I 7 \ \ S V • CENTRAL INFIL. BASIN", 252 SQ. FT. (PER..) f/%' 7,/ 863 SQ. FT. (PER.) (zl'_ 898 SQ. FT. (PER.) /./ I Ir -� l 431 SQ. FT. (PER.) _0�R n 12,925 SQ. FT. (IMP.) 46,900 SQ. FT. IMP. 6 46S q1 v�p( /) %�j o6 % q 1,091 SQ. FT. (PER.) R F �<<S T I ffjNG 6,900 SQ. FT. (IMP.) 1 /� J 9,579 SQ. FT. (PER.) s Rim=948.16 Inv. -933.79 i 6631 SQ. FT. (PER.) 1,487 SQ. FT. (PER.) 950 951 / 952 9Sq / 955' / 9s,6�� // / --66 .Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / 0 • ss / sss / IEOF=955.80 / P2 / 2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / EAST INFIL. BASIN 100 -YEAR HWL: 956.26 / / TREATMENT VOL.=1,952 C.F. / / /2 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP / / / V^"\ '1-6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP -RAP V, "\ 240 SQ. FT. (PER.) / / / / SQ. FT. (PER.) / sec / / LEGEND: i7;=oo; foo PROPOSED RIP RAP E.Q.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW BUILDING 53,115 AREA TYPE BOUNDARY GRASS/PERVIOUS 91,035 SUBCATCHMENT BOUNDARY DRAINAGE NOTES: 0 40' SCALE: 1" = 40' GENERAL DESCRIPTION: THE MONTICELLO SUITES CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 -LEVEL APARTMENT WITH OUTDOOR AND INTERIOR PARKING. THE SITE IS 6.0 ACRES. THERE IS 117,009 S.F. OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT AND THE 2 BUILDINGS MAKE UP AN AREA AROUND 53,115 S.F. THE SITE ENTRANCES ARE LOCATED ON 7TH STREET WEST AND ELM STREET. SOILS AND INFILTRATION ACCORDING TO THE WEB SOIL SURVEY, THE EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS ON THE SITE IS A 20 INCH LAYER OF SANDY LOAM WITH GRAVELLY COARSE SAND. WITH EXCAVATING THE TOP LAYER OF SOIL, THE BASINS WILL INFILTRATE INTO THE COARSE SAND (HSG) A WITH AN ASSUMED INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR. A DOUBLE -RING INFILTROMETER TEST IS REQUIRED TO BE CONDUCTED BY A LICENSED SOIL SCIENTIST OR ENGINEER TO VERIFY INFILTRATION RATES OF EACH INFILTRATION BASIN AFTER BASINS HAVE BEEN GRADED. RATE CONTROL A REGIONAL POND HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR 7TH STREET WEST AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE EXISTING OUTLET B WAS DESIGNED TO UTILIZE A CN OF 89. THE FOLLOWING CURVE NUMBERS AND AREAS WERE USED TO VERIFY THE PROPOSED CN IS LESS THAN THE PREVIOUS CN DESIGN OF 89. TYPE AREA CN PAVEMENT 117,009 98 BUILDING 53,115 98 GRASS/PERVIOUS 91,035 61 TOTAL WEIGHTED 261,159 85 ALL STORM WATER IS DIRECTED TO THE STORM SEWER WITHIN 7TH STREET WEST TO OUTFLOW TO THE REGIONAL POND. 1525 HDYROCAD CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN DONE FOR THE PROPOSED SITE TO DETERMINE THE PEAK ELEVATIONS AND FLOW RATES OUT OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS. (CONTACT BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES FOR THE REPORT IF NEEDED.) THE PEAK ELEVATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS ARE LESS THAN 1 FOOT OVER THE EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS. EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS ARE ONLY UTILIZED FOR 100 -YEAR STORM EVENTS. WATER IS DIRECTED TO STORM SEWER MANHOLES BELOW THE OVERFLOWS. VOLUME RETENTION FOUR INFILTRATION BASINS ARE PROPOSED ON SITE TO PROVIDE VOLUME CONTROL FOR A 1.1 INCH STORM. WITH 170,124 S.F. OF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, 15,594 C.F. (577 C.Y.) OF VOLUME IS REQUIRED TO BE HELD WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASINS. THE COMBINED VOLUME OF THE BASINS TO THE INITIAL OUTLET IS 15,633 C.F. (579 C.Y.) THE FOLLOWING TABLE ADDS TOGETHER THE VOLUMES OF THE BASINS. WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. z O ~ w O ui U o } U) w LLI � U c/) � W w 0 z 0 w Ir w 0 N p o CDLO U o J O o O LU N ' CONTOUR AREA VOLUME BETWEEN CENTRALINFIL. BASIN N N 61 955 551 m 2 956 2499 1525 0 LLI 957 4582 3541 LLJY z 957:5 5661 2561. TOTAL: C9 L CO w L` 7626 "zJ ZQ � NORTH INFIL. BASIN � 945 307 � 2 J 946 1145 726 TOTAL: DJ> Zz �Uw OJ 726 Q WEST INFIL. BASIN U 953 982 954 2403 1693 L) w 955 3927 3165 Q 955.5 4727 2164 TOTAL: o�p 5329 EASTINFIL. BASIN O 954 187 O 955 1674 931 2 955.8 3267 1952 TOTAL: 1952 COMBINED VOLUME 15633 WITH AN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR, ALL BASINS WILL BE ABLE TO INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS. WATER QUALITY RAIN TURRETS ARE USED AS PRETREATMENT BEFORE STORM WATER ENTERS THE INFILTRATION BASINS. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING RIP -RAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SILT FENCE, AND INLET PROTECTION WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILT RUNOFF. z O ~ w O ui U o } U) w LLI � U c/) � W w 0 z 0 w Ir w 0 N p o CDLO U o J O o O LU N ' I �: 00 N N 61 m z Q m 2 M W200 ♦/� {/ /� m 0 LLI Cf) LU N W F_ LLJY z z Y O cD C9 L CO w L` z "zJ ZQ � wN �N � J_ Q W � 2 J 0 0 0 U 0 IL '7 -6 O ) N QQ-Oia 0 d u) (n 0 zN 00 N N 61 '^ 7 v / ` z Q 0 0 2 M W200 ♦/� {/ /� �� N Q Cf) LU N W F_ LLJY Q Q U W r2 mQ - C9 L CO w L` O "zJ ZQ � wN �N � LLI F_~ LLJ LU 00 � =UZ V)N V♦ cC/Iw0 Lr [L(D co r,- MO DJ> Zz �Uw OJ W Q LU L/) z z Q 2 1 J V) z Q w p LU �zz U zQ � w CD LU o � wo •� z cn 0 Q LU U O 0 L7 L) w J Q U_ o�p O z O 0 U 2 V) SHEET NO. C�:3 \ � S s \Rim=942.48 � \ lnv.=9/4.58 \ \ S \ S � O S \ N�RIM==99451.34 nv514 1,040 S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STANDARD SEED MIX Rim=9J6.9/ \ In vp935.4/ / / 8" Sani. / W \ O� W , NE /n I / 8"WM / W WW WW a, W W W W W 4 s \I \ FES __- S 36" CMP S \ Elew 93255 - \ S - Rim=942.27 - /n v. -933. /2 S - \N S \\ Rim=943 /7 \ \ `\ lnv.=93286 \ 36" k,\ -INSTALL 276 LF OF DOUBLE LAYER Rim=943.62 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (552 LF TOTAL) w Inv.=934.20 E Inv. -9J4.20 D67F S lnv.=939.47 �OF=946.50 \ \SOD GRASS\ 8" PVC SDR 35 Soni. � CP� 4,828 LF \ \lk ` S� Rim= Inv. -942.57 • ROCK CONSTRUCTION: Rim=946.34 Inv.=935.52 ,985 S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET \ INSTALL 820 LF OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE ,I- Rough location of trail - Rim=949.05 / Inv. =937.73 1 Rim=948. l6 Inv. -93379 INSTALL 1042 LF �OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOG Rim=950.44 Inv=934. �` WWWW /W W W W / SOD GRASS /` / W ssi W * / W W / STANDARD SEED MIX W W W W / W W / \ W / W W / / / / / / 700 S.Y. OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET \-INSTALL 20 LF OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOG INLET PROTECTION (TYP.) W / o / �\ rn`O rn WWWWW / `\ Se C \Set W / \ \ W W \ INSTALL 1176 LF W W OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE \ W 4- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N ®I LEGEND: TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 0 20' EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N) SCALE: 1" = 20' W W W W W W W STANDARD SEED MIX W WWWWWWWWWWWWW INFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX W W SODDED GRASS OR LANDSCAPED AREA ASF GRADING LIMITS AND PROPOSED TEMPORARY SILT FENCE FIBER -LOG ROLLS �� •`%� PROPOSED RIP RAP 984 PROPOSED CONTOUR E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW \ TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER- HIGH FLOW EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE CONSTRUCTION/GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. 2. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S STORM WATER PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 3. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR GRADING OPERATIONS AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE PERMIT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY MEASURABLE RAINSTORM. DAMAGED SILT FENCE OR OTHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR PRACTICES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DEVICES SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. 5. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION. 6. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND THE MPCA. 7. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE DISTURBANCE OF ANY AREAS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL TRIBUTARY DISTURBED AREAS ARE RESTORED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING SILT FENCE AND BALES, UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT VEGETATION IN SAID AREAS. 9. ALL SOILS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER OFF-SITE AREA SHALL BE REMOVED DAILY. 10. THE SITE SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES FOR THE PROJECT MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION. 11. ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED AND VEGETATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE TO MN/DOT 2575. 12. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITH MN/DOT SEED MIX, MULCHED, FERTILIZED & DISK ANCHORED, PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: STANDARD SEED MIX 25-131: 220 LB/AC. INFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX 33-261: 35 LB/AC. FERTILIZER 22-5-10: 350 LB/AC. MULCH TYPE 3: 2 TONS/AC. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BMP'S SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON PLANS DURING PHASING ON PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH MPCA, CITY INSPECTOR AND DEVELOPER REQUEST. APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES • SILT FENCE: 4,828 LF • BIOLOG: 1,102 LF • ROCK CONSTRUCTION: 1 EACH • INLET PROTECTION: 17 EACH • EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N): 3,980 S.Y. • RIP RAP (CLASS 2) 54 C.Y. NOTE: AMOUNTS SHOWN DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR REPLACEMENT OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMPS FOUND TO BE NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. z O ~ W 0 L U 0 U) W W U U W C) n - Z 0 W V) Q� W 0 0� of Z p z o N -)0 0 0 N O W N ' I O v LU N M O m I C) 0 co m 0 W cn J zw N Q W Q z z YO Y� 2z UCU > mX .. W Q LL O U Q W 2 J 0 p D U D IL C5O -2 N 0 0 0 Q O cv m - U)dU U) 0 zN O v LU N M O z I C) 0 LO L0 W Cl) cn J zw N Q W Q LL N W H W Y� a a UCU > mX .. W Q LL O "Z J Z�Q WN Q'N wwZ U)., H� rQ1'� /cp V♦ >ZW ?ZZ �M V c�WO [LD O pJ0� CD F_ ryV Z>>J OHM<5z � cn LU z cn J Q Q LJ..I J �z U zQ O LU - � z O O LU U o U 00 U J _O cn LU DC 0 O U m `, T O W z O5 U SHEET NO. TREES, DECIDUOUS 51ENNA GLEN MAPLE 2.511 BB (17 QTY) 0 RIVER BIRCN 12FT BB (23 QTY) VORY SILK JAPANESE LILAC 2.011 BB (lq QTY) TREES, CONIFEROUS BLACK HILLS SPRUCE SFT BB (17 QTY) COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE GFT BB (7 QTY) 0 rIEDORA JUNIPER #15 (23 QTY) SNRUBS, DECIDUOUS ❑o L m VORY HALO DOGWOOD #5 (3q QTY) ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA #3 (30 QTY) LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA #3 (33 QTY) SNRUBS, CONIFEROUS TAUTON YEW #5 (27 QTY) PERENNIALS 0 11 M 2E FRANCES KLDAM5 HOSTA #I (82 QTY) KARL FOERSTER GRASS #1 (8, QTY) STELLA D 00 DAYLILY #1 (32 QTY) AUTUMN JOY SEDUM #1 (10 QTY) SOD 763.441.2141 greenscapeco.com H4� STATES TO MAN e FREEEE TR TRWK WHEMP ROFf —1—E TPLANTED � ,m H&10x40 MM THIN. x -I/�I ?�?W' k '' ` TWIT THE TRUNK FLARE IS NSIBOFLE FL qT T!E TOP OF THE ROOF HALL. ARDWOOD ES OR OTTER APPROVED STAK—E IMTERIAL *. ay 50 MM (21N.) MLLCH. W NOT PACE THE CROM ' eke e e EE TALON RI'r M INHAN?HE NEEDRFREE FOR 0, THREE TEARS A�fER FULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB TRUNK. PAINTING. NWgW S HA .yAH +IA 00NOT CODER THE TOP' OF THE ROOT BN1 WITH SOIL(4 N) HIGH EARTH SAILER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL. HARq D ET— OR OTHER REMOVE Al TWNE, ROPE ANDWRE, AND BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT E— III SPECFIED SOL M%TME FRMLT / COMPACTED TO ELMNATE AR — : arts'�PE EOGErt IUE A, FRV — — — -- STAKES SHAL aE LttvSN —I I III III—I —III III PLANT IS SHIPPED NTA A WIRE BASKET AROUND POLKETst E— SET TOP OF ROOT B4U_ AT LEAST DET 11--(I-2 IN) ABOVE GRADE (O2 HIGHER IN D_ ORANING 5OL5) THE ROOT BALL, OFT Toff WIRE RACKET N FD.IR PLACES PLACE ROOT AND FOLD COWV 200 M'1(B IR) INTO PJ.MNG HALE OR TAMPED BALLON IN—VATEO 501E CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL TYPICAL INSTALLATION - 61611 (2000'1) OR LE55 DO NOT HEANLY PR NE THE TREE AT PLANTMG. PRIME ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, C40O1N4M LEADERS, AND RCKI" OR EAD BRANCHE. 501'tE e -A o INTERI[A2 TWIGS AND LATERAL eppo FRO ABLE BRANCHES N SACH A M4NNER AS TO PRESERVE THE BRANCHES MAT BE —D; v0 @yv0 N HOWEVER, 00 NOT R THE ePo`d a R'N THATNAL BIL OF BRANCHES THAT IXIENO TO THE EDGE OF SHRu&S RANTED IN GR — E— THE CROM ' eke e e e 8M'1 (V2.)OIAM. ee —C TO. e e e e GA—WED WIRE OR CA&E SET TOP OF ROOT BN1 AT LE4 TWIST WRE TO TIGHTQN. e ' e GRADE (O(E-21N.) ABOVE R (O FULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB TRUNK. HI INLOWLY HIGHER IN SGRAINING ZOILZ) e 0 00 oo�°off 0 e EACH TREE — BE PLANTED SIKH IB00 x 40 MM THIN. x —N)THAT THE TRWK FLARE IS V151— AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT HALL HARq D ET— OR OTHER W MI'1(2UN) INLG1 DO NIT PLACE APPROVED STAKE NATERIAL DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT LLCH IN GONTACT WITH TREE TRWK. MANTAIN THE FULCH WEEOfREE F- WIIL BALL T! SO A MINIMLIY OF THREE YEARS AFTER 100 MM (4 N) HIGH EARTH SPLCER PLANTING BEYOnD EDGE OF ROOT BALL ALLO,N FOR SETTLEEIENT _ = = TAMP 501 AROUND ROOT BN1 ! — FIRMLY WIT! FOOT PRESSURE /!50 THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. L FN �5¢lTlE TE 1H[ Rm? flV1_ ALL INE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND // / / EURAP FROM TOP _ OF ROOT 8411 F F.�WT515A=SHIPPED WITH A NIKE fl4 fl AROUND THE ROOT BALL, CDT THE WIRE FAEKET IN FOUR RACES FLAKE ROOT 84LL ON NEXCAVATED AND FOD DOWN 200 MM (B IN) INTO PANTING HOLE OR TAMPED SOIL � DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL TYPICAL INSTALLATION - 3" (75MM) CALIPER OR LE55 INTERSTAE -114 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET S�I II L1� � JZ NOTES No. Date Description REwsloNS 410 Greenscape COMPANIFS L-iR volsoPpe • I rr'.E)at% ow • TLcr f landscape Plan SCALE DRAWN BY CTECKED BY DATE DATE OF PRNT MONTICELILO SUITES HWY 94 AN ELM STREET MONTICIELLO, MN, 55362 Powered by DynaSCAPE8 PRUNE o OR OB.IFSTION- P.�Wt IISHALL eE MEA3IRED FRO`t RwSHED GRADE TO THE UFPER FRO ABLE BRANCHES N SACH A M4NNER AS TO PRESERVE THE IMIN BOOP OF THE RANT /— NATURAL CHARACTER OF THE RANT SHRu&S RANTED IN GR — E— EO MM (2 IN) MULCH 00 NOT PLACE BE SET IN CCNTrruOEG EEDS As O p Q opo°0 FULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB TRUNK. suONN OR PLAN 0 00 oo�°off 0 e 81411 APRY E.—D TO 84RE- BIT A METHOD IIFLY IOD MM (4 N) HIGH EARTH SPLCER RaoT state t BN1E0 t BURLAP „, "3t{' o o� BErallo EnGE aF RaoT BALL srorx oQ � o SEf SHRUBS S7 (2') WGHER THAN SJRROWOING GAMAD E To To ALLO,N FOR SETTLEEIENT SPECIFIED SOIL MI%TIRE FIRMLY DO NOT CIYVER THE TOP DO THE ROOT BALL WITH s01L i / ! CCRiP —D TO ELIfAN4TE AIR FOCKETS AND PREVENT 6IRRIGATE N510E // / / SETREMENT SEARFr OF SHRUB PLANTING PIT PRIOR TO —I—.. PLANTING _/ I� IttI / ////// /////// REMOVE NURSERY POT PRIOR TO PLANING (IF APPLICA&E) III III EXCAVATE 6 PREPARE —T - CoriPALTED 31BGRADE BED TO 450 YIM (IB') DEEP OR TO AS SPECIFIED _—_ _—_— — — — — — III—III—III III—III—III—III— � SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL TYPICAL INSTALLATION INTERSTAE -114 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET S�I II L1� � JZ NOTES No. Date Description REwsloNS 410 Greenscape COMPANIFS L-iR volsoPpe • I rr'.E)at% ow • TLcr f landscape Plan SCALE DRAWN BY CTECKED BY DATE DATE OF PRNT MONTICELILO SUITES HWY 94 AN ELM STREET MONTICIELLO, MN, 55362 Powered by DynaSCAPE8 �nticello Residential SuitE 1 ,• . r- n--nLl T W I � L •1 OL �� I � I' � 1 • 1 1 I• , I '� 1 II v 1 ' ■ - F A --A I -min is m IF ■ ARCHITECTU RAL DESIGN DRAWING TITLE .6r i 1COVER SHEET sibr a C ,yam • #•� � � � * � � 1 . . i F ' DATE:08/03/22 I� SCALE AS NOTED DRAWING NUMBER 01 COPYRIGHTo2023 TOO STORY OPEN SCREENED PORCH l� L 14. . L ti! Wi,kly /If.J Aerlryl all" sm.2 oa w LL i fJLJ. i 112'-D' iM ii 1Y iYil iYLL ilY at MR aY Li�Fw iY 7a1LL i.1Y �• 2.7 7,-45., IM iY iM �dl+• �rll�• �4.J'iY• �iJi LL TLL.J: 7YLL 9 YMink" im I,IJI Le. Inn WLL 'M . r_ �.J m �y'#t r�rur NPNN" In - al I i17 .J SITE SUMMARY -10.0 ACRES -SEE SURVEY UNIT MIX: CONCEPT'E2a'=150 UNITS I'LE:rEL 0 PARKING, UNIT CUNT -LAND AREA= 160.1 6.4-2°•.°•PER AtiCRE FIVE LEVELS ( GROUND LEVE LPARKINC- uARAGE-101 STALLS) -00 INDOOR PARKING STALLLS+t17} TUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS= 116 DETACHED GALRACE STALLS=44 -OTAL INDOOR PARKING STALLS =160 INDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT= 100 150=1.47 OU -DG OR PARKING S-ALLS=186 -OTAL PARKING=340 TOTAL BEDROOMS=238 TOTAL PARKING TO BEDROOM RATI0=346 f 236=1-47 STALLS PER BEDROOM 1. LEVEL (0)=7 UNITS BEDROOMS PER FLOOR=7a 1.1. STUDIOS -0 1.2. ONE BEDROOM -7 1.3. TWO BEDROOM -0 1.4. THREE BEDROOM -0 2. LEVEL ;1Y33UNITS (WITH '171NDWIDUALLTUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS), (BEDROOMS PER FLOOR -45) 2.1. STUDIOS -4 2.2. ONE BEDROOM -18 2.3. TWO BEDROOM -10 2.4. THREE BEDROOM -1 2.5. (17�TIJCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS 3. LEVEL (2}i10 UNITS, (BEDROOMS PER FLOOR=67) 3.1- STUDIOS -4 3.2_ ONE BEDROOM -22 3.3- TWO BEDROOM -11 3.4- THREE BEDROOM -0 4. LEVEL POOL] NITS, (BEDROOMS PER FLOOR=79) 4.1. STUDIOS -4 4.2. ONE BEDROOM -11 4.3. TWO BEDROOM -11 4.4. THREE BEDROOM -14 h. LEVEL(4Y30 UNITS, (BEDROOMS PER FLOOR=47) 5.1_ STUDIOS 5.2_ ONE BEDROOM -12 5.3_ TWO BEDROOM -11 5.4_ THREE BEDROOM -0 -OTAL U N IT MIX, {BEDROOMS PER PROD ECT=238 � 5.1_ STUDIOS -10.101150=0.106-10% 6.2- ONE BEDROOM -70, 78 1 150=0-47-47% 5.3_ TWO BEDROOM -43, 431150=0.2B-29% 6.4- TH R EE BEDROOM -21, 21 1150=D. 14-14% DASHED LINE N D IC RTES FLOOR AB %VE im Mei ♦,YELL �dY-r �fL}J4' 7iSi2W iM YM Viai Li Ilil Lt. 'EP2 i xd L7. i�Y� Y-` aBREW" IMLai aw S 7Nii 7Y LL i.1Y LL• 7Y03/E�YI ��•. SialY,Y' irYk aL l� 5M1r 51h LL aL SM �wr Naz ai h4" ,M ir-r w.51w IJ. Ll. M.L 17utl8 bF-nd-" iq ai i&54r M■ 0. IM 04F. #Y 7YLL tm IFPLEww 4AI&LL it J it Lr. N. W. 1,I1■ Lr. r �L� { f� z7L al , tylia rwr BUILDING PU*C PT' ' L 3 & 4 FY iM iM lii 4W .A A4MO. . Misr 3�?>y f {iYLL 7Y t *y LLQ' ini ai I,1iY iL• K�]�]'i�II��I MAXIMUM AVERAGE GRADE PLANE -6-0" SO THAT GROUND FLOOR DOES NOT COUNT AS A STORY -GROUP -R -2 -TYPE VA - FOUR STORY MAXIMUM ABOVE GRADE PLANE. MAX. 36,000 S.F PER STORY BASIC ALLOWABLE -(SEE TABLE 506.2) NOTE: TYPE -III A OR B CONSTRUCTION MAXIMUM FIVE FLOORS ABOVE GRADE PLANE -(SEE TABLE 504.4), MAX. 48,000-S.F. III -B OR 72,000 III -A S.F PER STORY BASIC ALLOWABLE -(SEE TABLE 506.2) NOTE - FLOOR AREAS CAN BE INCREASED BY CREATING CONNECTED BUT INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS WITH TWO INDEPENDENT STAIRS EACH BY ADDING 2 HOUR SEPARATION BETWEEN EACH FIRE AREA. BUILDING SECTION �j 1/16" = 1'-0" Y VIyR■rVJ. ■ S! ■ Y \■ ■ SR SR■ ■SR r. J --.4. ■�■� ■I i_r ■� Ai .Q hi617M, YY�• IM iNd6 ,TF1 LL 3T�dr� ,fir a�r IIi. LL jiiiJ rm r,�ae ,M ri..ndp,P5l W-r yyyy��7% JJ i• 1 0 bo l.il Lf. BUILDING SECTION �j 1/16" = 1'-0" Y VIyR■rVJ. ■ S! ■ Y \■ ■ SR SR■ ■SR r. J --.4. ■�■� ■I i_r ■� Ai .Q 1 O bo 1 0 bo 1 0 Eo' 0 0 1 BUILDING SECTION �j 1/16" = 1'-0" Y VIyR■rVJ. ■ S! ■ Y \■ ■ SR SR■ ■SR r. J --.4. ■�■� ■I i_r ■� Ai .Q Monticello R4L%.q;idential SLl ites L t E do do :. A 1 :.arm J416 p woo IN —A 16 0- MENOMINEE. Ar pope r It 1 . o. 1 I * ft d 1 F _ 1 A IL r r .f k L91111- # + AA � J tr -moi LL- Ir J67 fFA Ira 11:1 IN�1 f A 4 m N mW _ ad did A, Affod boo sib J ' L '-IowaARCHITECTU RAL DESIGN V.1 ��■ 11DRAWING TITLE t. • • r 11 ell tr o - min DATE: 08/07/23 SCALE � _1 I r� rAS NOTED t Oki DRAWING NUMBER 08 i COPYRIGHTO2023 Br'i DASHED LINE INDICATES FLOOR ABOVE s ComDanies TWO STORY OPEN SCREENED PORCH IN0"x32'-4" 840 s.f. 1BR 26'-0"x32'-4" 840 s.(. 12%'"x32'-4" 840 s.f. COMMON AREA TWO STORY SCREENED PORCH ONE ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL / 25'-0"x33'-0" / M M e�/41 /NG 112'-0" 16R 16R 26'-0"x32'4" 26'-0"x32'-4" 840 s.f. 840 J. ELEVATOR CORE/OFFICE /COMMON SPACE 1BR 26'-0"x32'4" 840 J. 2BR2BR 35'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0" 1,058 s.f. 1,120 s.f. COMMON 1BR 2BR AREA OFF 25'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0 POOL AREA 756 s.(. 1,116 sJ." BUILDING PLAN -CONCEPT ' E2a'-ENTRY LEVEL 1 1/32)) = 1'-0" 277'-6" 26'-0" 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 8 2 BR 2 BR STUDIO 1811 37'-0"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 37' -0"x30' -O" 37' "x30'-0" 37' -0"x30' -O" 19'-0"x30'-0" 26'-O'hc35'-0" 1,120 s.f. 756 s.(. 756 s.(. 1,1 0 s.f. 1,120 s.f. 575 0. 965 0. contractor Contact: Office: BR project P -2022.028 -Maple Lake -Briggs 10R1 -"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 1 BR 1 BR 784 J. 756 s.(. 2BR 2BR 1 BR STUDIO 113R 25'-0"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0 STUDIO \M� C 0 35'-0-0"x30'-0 1 BR BIR 20'-0"x30'-0" 26'-0"x34'-2" ELEVATOR CORE / OFFICE 756 s.f. 756 s.f. 1 BR 605 s.f. 1,116 s.f." 1,116 s.V' 26'-0"x30'-0" MC0 Q\ 886 J. 756 s.(. 784 s.f. date: 09.14.23 drawing no. revisions: / J 1BR"x30'-0" A00.00.00 A00.00.00 Of: m 2 BR / \ OR -0"x30'-0" 1,103 J. 1,103 756 s.f. STUDIO 20'-0"x30'-0" / 605 J. / O1 -0 25'-0"x30'-0" / 756 s.f. 1 BR / 25x30'-0" 7566 s.s.f. / n (17)- L2: 2 BR WIDE 37'-0"x30'-0" GARAGE / 1,120 s.f. 4:0„ / STUDIO 19'-0"x30'-0" 667 s.f. /11311 26'-0"x35'-0" / 973 s.(. ONE ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL / 25'-0"x33'-0" / M M e�/41 /NG 112'-0" 16R 16R 26'-0"x32'4" 26'-0"x32'-4" 840 s.f. 840 J. ELEVATOR CORE/OFFICE /COMMON SPACE 1BR 26'-0"x32'4" 840 J. 2BR2BR 35'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0" 1,058 s.f. 1,120 s.f. COMMON 1BR 2BR AREA OFF 25'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0 POOL AREA 756 s.(. 1,116 sJ." BUILDING PLAN -CONCEPT ' E2a'-ENTRY LEVEL 1 1/32)) = 1'-0" 277'-6" 26'-0" 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 8 2 BR 2 BR STUDIO 1811 37'-0"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 37' "x30'-0" 37' -0"x30' -O" 19'-0"x30'-0" 26'-O'hc35'-0" 1,120 s.f. 756 s.(. 756 s.(. 1,1 0 s.f. 1,120 s.f. 575 0. 965 0. o CD Co 3 BR 2BR 2 B 1 BR. I ® STUDIO 18R 37'-0"x30'-0 37' "x30'-0 25'-0x30'-0" 45'-0"x33'-0" 19'-0"x34'-2" 26'-0"x34'-2" 1, 357 s.f. 1,116 sJ." 1,1 6 s.(." 756s 648 s.f. 947 s.f. 112'-0" 277'-6" SITE SUMMARY- ±6.0 ACRES -SEE SURVEY UNIT MIX: CONCEPT'E2a'=150 UNITS (LEVEL 0 PARKING) UNIT CUNT T LAND AREA=150 / 6.0--25.5 PER ACRE FIVE LEVELS ( GROUND LEVEL PARKING GARAGE -101 STALLS 99 INDOOR PARKING STALLS+(17) TUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS=116 DETACHED GARAGE STALLS=44 TOTAL INDOOR PARKING STALLS =160 INDOOR PARKING STALLS PER UNIT=160 / 150=1.07 OUTDOOR PARKING STALLS=186 TOTAL PARKING=346 0 0 r` TOTAL BEDROOMS=238 TOTAL PARKING TO BEDROOM RATIO=346 / 235=1.47 STALLS PER BEDROOM 1. LEVEL (0)=7 UNITS (BEDROOMS PER FLOOR=7) 1.1. STUDIOS -0 1.2. ONE BEDROOM -7 1.3. TWO BEDROOM -0 1.4. THREE BEDROOM -0 2. LEVEL (1)-33 UNITS (WITH 17 INDIVIDUAL TUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS), (BEDROOMS PER FLOOR=45) 2.1. STUDIOS -4 2.2. ONE BEDROOM -18 2.3. TWO BEDROOM -10 2.4. THREE BEDROOM -1 2.5. (17) -TUCK UNDER GARAGE STALLS 3. LEVEL (2)-40 UNITS, (BEDROOMS PER FLOOR=57) 3.1. STUDIOS -4 3.2. ONE BEDROOM -22 3.3. TWO BEDROOM -11 3.4. THREE BEDROOM -3 4. LEVEL (3)-40 UNITS, (BEDROOMS PER FLOOR=79) 4.1. STUDIOS -4 4.2. ONE BEDROOM -11 4.3. TWO BEDROOM -11 4.4. THREE BEDROOM -14 5. LEVEL (4)-30 UNITS, (BEDROOMS PER FLOOR=47) 5.1. STUDIOS -4 5.2. ONE BEDROOM -12 5.3. TWO BEDROOM -11 5.4. THREE BEDROOM -3 TOTAL UNIT MIX, (BEDROOMS PER PROJECT=238) 5.1. STUDIOS -16,16 /150=0.106-10% 5.2. ONE BEDROOM -70, 70 / 150=0.47--47% 5.3. TWO BEDROOM -43, 43 / 150=0.29'29% 5.4. THREE BEDROOM -21, 21 / 150=0.14-14% b il- TWO STORY OPEN SCREENED PORCH A1.0 1/32" = 1'-0" / COMMON AREA TWO / STORY SCREENED PORCH 1,031 J. / / / 18R / 26'-0"x34'-2" 890 s.(. / / 11311 26'-0"z34'-2" 890 s.f. / / / 1611 26'-0"x34'-2" 877 s.f. 2 BR 37'-0"x30'-0" 1,120 s.f. 3 BR STUDIO 0'-0" —J 45'-0"x30'-0" 1,357 s.f. 19'-0"x3 665 s.f. 1BR 6'-0"x35'-0" 906 J. 161"x34' 2" 846 s.f. IN"x30'-0" 784 J. 1BR 1BR 1BR 26' 0"x34' 2" 26' 0"x34'-2" 26' 0"x34'-2" 890 s.(. 890 s.f. 890 s.f. 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR INx30'-0" 2 BR 2 BR STUDIO 1811 35'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 1,357 s.f. 37'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0" 19'-0"x30'-0" 26' -0"x35' -O" 1,058 J. 1BR"x30'-0" 1,120 s.f. 756 J. 756 s.f. 756 J. 1,120 s.f. 575 s.f. 908 s.f. contractor Contact: Office: BR project P -2022.028 -Maple Lake -Briggs 10R1 -"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 1 BR 1 BR 784 J. 756 s.(. 2BR 2BR 1 BR STUDIO 113R 25'-0"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0 STUDIO 37'-0"x30'-0 35'-0-0"x30'-0 25'-0"x30'-0" 20'-0"x30'-0" 26'-0"x34'-2" ELEVATOR CORE / OFFICE 756 s.f. 756 s.f. 1 BR 605 s.f. 1,116 s.f." 1,116 s.V' 26'-0"x30'-0" 648 s.(. 886 J. /COMMON SPACE 784 s.f. date: 09.14.23 drawing no. revisions: A00.00.00 A1.0 ® 00.00.00 1BR"x30'-0" A00.00.00 A00.00.00 Of: 756 s.f. 2 BR x30'-0" \ 1,103 J. 1,103 3 BR STUDIO 0'-0" —J 45'-0"x30'-0" 1,357 s.f. 19'-0"x3 665 s.f. 1BR 6'-0"x35'-0" 906 J. 161"x34' 2" 846 s.f. IN"x30'-0" 784 J. 1BR 1BR 1BR 26' 0"x34' 2" 26' 0"x34'-2" 26' 0"x34'-2" 890 s.(. 890 s.f. 890 s.f. 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 2 BR STUDIO 1811 35'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0" 19'-0"x30'-0" 26' -0"x35' -O" 1,058 J. 1,120 J. 1,120 s.f. 756 J. 756 s.f. 1,120 s.f. 1,120 s.f. 575 s.f. 908 s.f. contractor Contact: Office: Mobile: project P -2022.028 -Maple Lake -Briggs C_ STORAGE 1 BR 1 BR 2BR 3 BR 2BR 2BR 1 BR STUDIO 113R 25'-0"x30'-0" 25'-0"x30'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0 45'-0"x33'-0" 37'-0"x30'-0 35'-0-0"x30'-0 25'-0"x30'-0" 19'-0"x34'-2" 26'-0"x34'-2" ELEVATOR CORE / OFFICE 756 s.f. 756 s.f. 1,116 s.f." 1, 357 s.f. 1,116 s.f." 1,116 s.V' 756 s.f. 648 s.(. 886 J. /COMMON SPACE 'E2a' date: 09.14.23 drawing no. revisions: A00.00.00 A1.0 ® 00.00.00 ,&00.00.00 A00.00.00 BUILDING PLAN -CONCEPT ' E2a'- LEVEL 2 1/32)) = 1'-011 Pat, Please see the attached section. I think this is a good starting point but I believe I heard you mention over the course of the week that you like to have your first floor ceiling height with the primary entry at 9'-1 1/8". rough ceiling height all other floors 8'-1 1/8" 24" deep floor trusses, 1'-8" roof trusses. 1'-8" deep Roof trusses with 3/4" decking - 6" Iyanate 8'- 1 1/8" rough t.o. pre -cast lsocnsolatin-typical to btm. Of clg. framing 7-7 d-pfloor trusses with 3/4' g'_ 1 111, rough t.o. pre -cast s fir: typical to btm_ of clg. framing 8'-1 1/8" rough Lo_pre-cast to btm. of clg. forming •.,...m.« L 9'-11/8"rough to. r cast ge- t CODE SUMMARY 2020 MNBC CHAPTER 5 MAXIMUM AVERAGE GRADE PLANE -6'-0" SO THAT GROUND FLOOR DOES NOT COUNT AS A STORY -GROUP -R -2 -TYPE VA -FOUR STORY MAXIMUM ABOVE GRADE PLANE. MAX. 36,000 S.F PER STORY BASIC ALLOWABLE -(SEE TABLE 506.2) NOTE: TYPE -III A OR B CONSTRUCTION MAXIMUM FIVE FLOORS ABOVE GRADE PLANE -(SEE TABLE 504.4), MAX. 48,000-S.F. III -B OR 72,000 III -A S.F PER STORY BASIC ALLOWABLE -(SEE TABLE 506.2) NOTE -FLOOR AREAS CAN BE INCREASED BY CREATING CONNECTED BUT INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS WITH TWO INDEPENDENT STAIRS EACH BY ADDING 2 HOUR SEPARATION BETWEEN EACH FIRE AREA. 9'-1 1/8" much top of pre -cast m bottom of ceiling rra ing_ ,uN.ro".ate. E,"s.. n,uEExrarsiuiva E. At, N () Of BASIC BUILDING SECTION -GENERAL REFERENCE NO SCALE U AINLY DETAIL Mainly Details Architectural Design, PLLC PH 612-382-5682 Suite 213, 1710 North Douglas Drive, Golden Valley, MN 55422 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. date: Gregg S. Graton, AIA certification no. \GSGGigniture\002Jpg SIGNATURE DATE: Owner: Larry Kasella consultants Architect: Mainly Details, Architectural Design, PLLC. Surveyor: Civil Engineer: Structural Engineer: contractor Contact: Office: Mobile: project P -2022.028 -Maple Lake -Briggs C_ =3N CO UI C/)LCA U-) O Q I rVl 1..1..1 czc _ G 0 _ U) 213cm O W = G This document is the property of Gregg S. Graton Architect and is intended to be an instrument of service for this project only. No reproduction is allowed without the written consent of Gregg S. Graton Architect. Use infringements will be prosecuted. The contractor is responsible for the verification of all on-site conditions and dimensions. Any and all discrepancies from that indicated by these documents shall be reported to the general contractor/ owner or architect prior to commencement of work. drawing Concept 'E2a' date: 09.14.23 drawing no. revisions: A00.00.00 A1.0 ® 00.00.00 ,&00.00.00 A00.00.00 A00.00.00 Of: 9-19-23 Apartment Building Material Percentages 65% Onyx & White Steel siding 21% cedar tone steel siding 14% Cultured stone Detached Garage 38% Onyx & White Steel siding 44% cedar tone steel siding 18% Cultured stone Tree In tory CLW forL) V) w 0 GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION City of Monticello,, Wright County, Minnesota For the purposes of this tree survey, the tree may exhibit one or more of Notes: w the characteristics within each of the L Some trees surveyed near the Q condition categories as described below: property lines are not on the o subject property. See map view. Good: X The tree is mostly vertical, 2. Tree diameter as listed in the comprised of one or more main attached chart indicates a L' o stems, is mostly symmetrical, does measurement of the tree trunk in not exhibit storm damage, does inches at a point five feet above not exhibit evidence of disease. natural grade. Fair: m < 0 0 The tree is most/ vertical, J. Owner shall preserve existing trees. 04 o comprised of one or more main Any removals shall be shown on oN v > N stems, may exhibit some future site plans. Before any C) asymmetrical growth from grading, demolition, or other 0 N crowding, may have minor storm disturbances, tree protection needs 0 m to be installed. O damage, does not exhibit evidence m m w 0 50 of disease. Lw J o Poor: 4. Trees under 6 inches in diameter z Y z The tree may be noticeably were not included in the inventory, N Q w CD w SCALE: 1 = 50 � leaning, comprised of one or more other than those shown. o 0 o U o LE main stems, exhibits asymmetrical growth from crowding, sustained 5. According to the City of Monticello o T T Denotes Limits of Investigation Boundarymajor storm damage, or appears preliminary plot requirements, a � cn co 9 / diseased. survey of tree coverage may 6 -v � Denotes Tree, Coniferous exempt trees that are invasive as a� v defined by the Department of a Denotes Tree, Deciduous Natural Resources. a� L v o sc-� �°_� z 4001 Denotes Tree Identification Number 6. Several Siberian Elm trees were vi °� + : c identified during the on—site tree � v ° o investigation. These trees are not � +' o r°n E J shown on the survey or listed in 1b the the attached charts. Siberian Elm ° > N (U/mus pumila) is considered an +' v c a invasive terrestrial plant on the ,� Q .0 v o � a 00 c° Minnesota Department of Natural Q i c 1 Resources website. v QJ o m Cn o ttia t 0 Q' v —�vo N o N � M � / Z m 1 00 0000 01 Ln W W N Z� 0 W H W Y W W �t M 0 c� z w N Z W 00 D� } w �i ww �� Q ♦V/�� N pcV U)zc� �� WZ �(p �! O z>a- � J Q Q O W \ y4\ \ i L V � z O I F— Q / I \ O C U o L �- L o +� z p o O U = LJ O w o v > 4- 0 ~ o U_ Q U W VSHEETS Tree No. Species DBH (Inches) Condition Stems 4276 Cedar 6 Good 1 4277 Cedar 8 Good 1 4278 Cedar 8 Good 1 4279 Ash 5 Good 3 4281 Basswood 3 Good 1 4282 Hackberry 2 Good 1 4283 Maple 3 Good 1 4284 Basswood 2 Good 1 4285 Maple 2 Good 1 4286 Basswood 2 Good 1 4287 Maple 3 Good 1 Monticello Parking Management Plan (see highlighted plan for details) Unit Mix: Studios = 16 x 1.2 parking stalls per bedroom = 20 parking assignments 8 outdoor 7 underground phase 1 5 underground phase 2 1 Bedrooms = 70 x 1.2 parking stalls per bedroom = 84 parking assignments 35 outdoor 13 underground phase 1 20 underground phase 2 12 Detached garages with tandem stall 4 Attached tuck under with tandem stall 2 Bedrooms = 43 x 2 bedrooms x 1.2 parking stalls per bedroom =104 parking assignments 10 outdoor 13 underground phase 1 15 underground phase 2 48 Detached garages with tandem stall 18 Attached tuck under with tandern stall 3 Bedrooms = 21 x 3 bedrooms x 1.2 parking stalls per bedroom = 76 parking assignments 4 outdoor 18 underground phase 1 6 underground phase 2 32 Detached garages with tandem stall 16 Attached tuck under with tandem stall 60 additional outdoor harking stalls not assigned Gs� I I � I r •k � I 1. 0 7 l 1 I _ I r '-• �Lp IL ` •F f r i ��• k � V r t{5�� 1 '4L7 1 I `I141� b r a } 0 I ;'A L -0—. - S O — L IL 4 � tk afl r ; t ti 1 qo I -r s L.J , k yfl�' i jf Ac cro � - I 1 � -� • �• - -�may,, � 1 rTi' r _ 00 1 r A� _y •' S � I r I y y � w xE ti 1 ,44,11 I '7' - - Q ,hp T F, -b a- 7 '6* I --L P01 OL0�Y4 �4k-#JL Cis+�W ` rn i Z-4 CM w rne�rri F �Q�7�pQr—rn� 'afn0Z K w Cl m im E F 0 K + ren m r. X ; 1 'w C # m0 ;u M i 8/1912023 1:13 PM NAProj"ects Current\23-0250.00 Briggs MonticellolEngineering\CAD FilesWonti Briggs Site.dwg 3 -' 4 - ►i it a. Jw. r f a J. k P_ " w 1w H O •i O O ro ❑ v w 1� O ro h A 7 7 w ,C LL C U b N G a O ro.i H U Grl N+ O N O N A 0.0 H . W o m a H a b N A N m v v w° m -.ci 4 W O m m� H b� ti -H '•i C v a.aHiaa1' N v'" a E H JL E ro m A C svi b G .i >. m O ,a m a w +� H ro.� -�u❑N ° av rnw° .c sroi v a° o a v +� +� ro .N .i a o a O H a G E ro N H A .i rl v ro O G row va H o+� roa a O d o aai c a ro m >a H a A W N U O P ti o v H o H G a o r. a N N> N 3 N 0 7 a ro a a a aN A m a mN avw.c v ro cti U G m Vi 1� G N ti ro G C fOL G W H 3 v A b 06.0 FC ro 1� A m W -N a C m E m H O N v o G W x a a w m G 0 W M> C G 0 U .G1 H ro N 'O .0 U O U N m b 0 G O H N N "�O .roi .i W-0 w 7 >r W m v v H N W G C G U N N N w W > N w O E a N e w O n G a a U 0 1 w O O ro A a a w G m y P� v N N w m > w e -H v o v 'd C) ro N H> -H 0.c,�.� a a' O m W a w H G O '>IS O W N SLE N .0 N.i .� ro U >r a G HO W .1 w 4 H h. " A G O '� a a E m> H W v N H H> a a W .0 v N 0 N O N W >r N b W o !L H %H a .n G 10 w a o 1�i.ci rtis IL In Q m /� v J m L1. C �I� V Q (� (n O O O m N Z Lu m Ir 01 c N o %N O Q N Y C _ C7 (6 � � Q m y 7 � O _ T J&P IL J U a O C� � C U J Q E .�. C10 O Z O E L U N o 96 1 J> o N N C N N 7 O N c N N 7 O a 0 NN 7 Z � w 1 L. L I L U) � U U E sz � a IL a Y LN Scale: 1 inch= 29 Ft. f rf f • ell. ,tom L � i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0�0 �0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.fO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0Oe0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.0C�$1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 � a�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 ■ 0.0 0.0 �,0•L 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.d � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � 0� .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o� o.o -o.a o.o o.o o.o o. o.o � �o o.o o.o o.o •o. o.o o.o o.o o.o a.o o.o a.a•�o.o o.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.®.,� � o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o d�e.o� o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o •.o o.0 0.0 �0 0.0 0.0,' -0-0 ' • o``.o .o o. o.o Jo'o o.0 0.0 0.0 0 .o o. o.o o.o o. a.o o.o a.a 0.0 0.o O.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.a o_o �io�,o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o�06.0 �_o.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.o�o.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.o,o.oo.oo.oo.ooo.ooa.a.oa.ao.oo.oo.o�o.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.�o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o, o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o f � r � - - T I�Ii BIZ � � o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o •o.o o .o �d.o •o.o o.o o.o oa.o o.o o.o o.o o.o, o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 'bio tid ro -o.o _ o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o• o.o o.o o.o o.o- = a�� P. p• =7 o o.o o.o o.o o a.a a. o.o o.o o.o o.o -0o ~cr.•o o.o a.o o.o o.o o:o o.o -o .Ao.o- � v.o• o.a o.o o.o �.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o.o o.o o o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o � •''�� " r`.1 - o.o °oa� o.o o.dl� o.o o.o o.o o�.o �o.o o.o o.o o.o �.a5� YfCY o' o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.� o.o o.o o.o _o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 ; .0 0.0 •.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 X0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.01. :Q.O -Al 0.0 0 '1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '� D. ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Z f • � L 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0� 0.0 0.0 0 � 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0'■i � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.O.P. 0 0.0 .� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ��~ b�.0 0 �_L Ld.O - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � • �. TMJ LL � �L� • � � -o.7 - - � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0• 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 -•• � 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -o 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0•.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /�O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 •0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a0 0.0 �• 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � � � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 _ 0.1 0.1 0.1 � � '1 ti 0:1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.-0 x••0.0 0.-0 �1 �= r;, ri 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0� 0.0 0.0 •T •� � 11i� � I r �rL • • � � _ r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /00o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0,'0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0.0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0 0.1 ti 0.2 0.1 0.10��0.�0� 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,•0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 6.0 1.5� 0. �.• 0.1 0.1 � Q•.R 1 r 0.1 r �.1 '•. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0 0.1 0.5 1.3 1.3 0.7 0.3 0.� 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 r• r � ® '�•i� tirrr1.7 +r �, _ r_r 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •'0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 �0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 r 7.8 9.9 2.3 0 6 0.3'-•0 .'2•,.Ip.2'•'•�.1� � Ll ' OJl 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 ••'L _ - 1.1 4.5- 9.6 1.7 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 Or Oa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.�r .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0� � 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 'S'•� 0.9 2.1 2.6 1.2 0.5 0.3 0�• .:.9F .2 0.1 OZ1 �.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 X0.0 0 1 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0�0 0.0 .0 7.5 2.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.3: 0.3• 0.2 ti•p.2 •: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 O.l�r 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 � , ` 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 .1 0.0••L0.0 0.0 0.0 • .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 �0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 �•' 7.2 9.5 2.5 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0. 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 G•. �, •'JJ.2 �.1� •0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 p.l 0.1 0.1 � 10:1•.•,Q ...7_ 0.1 0. .i. 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.1 O.Or 0.0 .0 ff 1 J ti i •• .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 } 0'�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 T.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 L 0.9 1.8 2.4 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 '.:I . •'„�1r2 0.2 1,0.7. 0.1 0.1 0.1 �.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 �"(til• f 9,.b 0.1 0.1 f 2.6 2.1 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0 0.0 ` 0.� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.� 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 8.7 2.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 ■1.£ • 3.9 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.7 0. 0.9 0.3 0.3J r•0,3 ••0�2 t,(}r2 r•; 0.2 • -0.1 0.1 �.1 0.1 • O, i■ 0.1 �0.j •• 0.1 0.1 d. 1. • OI ;L ti3O.1 0.1 � T9.7 t.7 1.4 0.7 3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 71 } S 1■�`�,51.'F� I r� 1 : • L • . L ._ i • 1 1 • L �. - ' "' 1 . . • F • ~ 1 r ••0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 0.0 .0 ` 6.3 9.2 2.5 0.8 .5 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 Z�0 2.9�I,��j 2.2 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.6 0. 0.9 :��4_ 0.3 0.3 •0.2� �.2: •0 A 0.� � 0.1 0.1 0.1 1d.1 0.1 0.1' 0.'1 0.1. 1_0�� ~. d; 0,r.�A,.1� •'' � 2.0 3.0 2.2 1.3 0. 0.3 0.2 � 0.1 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 '1 -r � r- • , , _ 1 •, � ' 1 -J 1 1 1 r ti■ _-J •• '1 •' _ • 0.0. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 1.0 1.6 2.2 1.2 � D. 0. 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.1 - 9.9 4.8 9.0 2.9 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0. 0.9 0.9 0..3 0.2 0.2 p.2• �.1 0.1 �.1 0.��1 i 0.1 �0.1 0.0 0.0 •'0.1• •,0 ±1•; •'•�.L 1.3 1.5 1.2 0.8 .5 0.3 X0.2 0. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 10.1 2.6 0.9 0.7 .5 0.9 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.6} 5.0 �3 10.0 4.7 2.8 1.8 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2• d.2�.2 -� 0.1 r�.9-R 0.1-' 0.1 L d".1 0' /0.1 0.1 0.0 •�0.0 0.0 -r 0..0 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.� 0.1 0.1 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 d.0 0 0.0 '� 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0 �` f 5.2 8.7 2.7 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.9 .5 0.7 1 •1.8 3.4 �6.7 12.8 1 � 7.2 3.8 2.2 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 0 9 �;7}�•' 0. 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.21• •tir0.•c�r _�� 1 0.1 0.1 0.' ••• ? 0.1- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .2 0.3 0.4 0. 0.3 0.2 i 0.1 .1 0.1� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.l•1• 0.2 0. 1.2 1.6 2.1 1.3 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.x''•11; 1 1.8 3.2 tir3.0 19.1 15.0 8.1 �.� 4 _ 1.7 1.6 - 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.6, � S'f2 0.9 0.7 0.5 .5 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 12-1, `�1• •yP.l 0,.1 0.1 •0.1 0.'1} 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2- .2 0.2 • .0.1 0. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1� �0.2 0 9 0.7 1. f 13.1 3.2 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 ••0.7� }.0 1.5 2.6 4.6 8.2 1 11.3�IT11�3 ~ Osi 6.2 3.6 2.3 1.7" L2.0 2.9 3.1 3.6 3.9� 2.8 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 � t1'�T� 0.6 0. 0.4 i.4 3 ' 0.2'•.•0.20_1 - 0.-1 0.1 'Q.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 D� 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Oro 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -116 1 ' ' • 1 �•�' *IJI�L '-111 ,1 4} ' ' 1 �� . i1 � • . J? cc 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .i 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.3 2. 3.9 7.5 2.9 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.8 0. 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.9 2.9 9.3 5.5• Y.9 4.1 ��Lz-1 1.9 2.3 3.9 7.0 �.} 4.9 3.1 2.0 1.9 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 ■0.9 0,.3 � 1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.� 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 or ..0 0.0 .1 0.1 0.2��_0.3 0.7 1.3 2.5 4.6 2. � 1.1 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.3 �4 0.7 9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.1 1.9 ~ 2�6 9.9 8.1 13_0 1�6 9.8 2.7 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 ®.9 •- 0.3, Oat 0.2 0.1 0.10 �1 �.1 0.1 •.1 0.0 �•0 0. 0.0 X0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.0 0.0 O.G �-rf"0,{- 0.0 0.1 12 0.3 0.6 1.1 2.0 2$ 2.9 1. � 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.9,2.5 0.3 0.9 2.6 � 4.0 2.9 1.5 1.0 - 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.7 9.,8 �6 17. 1�.,5• 12.0 6�1 Z 42.1 I i.7 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.0 0.7 .5 0.9 0. 0.2 P.1 �'1 {.1 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0,-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 'i1� 0.0 0.0 •0.0• S�� 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1� 0. 0. 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.3 0.8 0.4 •• 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.7 3.`6� �F.� • � .} ti r ' 9 D ° 4.7 3.3 1.9 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.5 2.3 9.0 7-5 13.0 14.91 10.2 5.6 3.2 2. 2 2.0 2.3 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.2 2.9 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 � N,v-1y� 0.0 0 0.0 � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • r.7 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 �„0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.6 0.7 0. 0.5 0 �3 0.3 .4 1.2 3.3 6.8 9.4 �$,•'� �• � D o 6.2 3.8 2.2 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Tl.R Z �'.� -- .8 9!5 6.7 7.7 6. 9.2 ti .Z„7 2.1 2 6.6 7.3 6.1 3.9 2.9 1■5 0.9 0. 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.1 .1 � .O 0.0 X4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Iti ti , r- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A7.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 �4�3_ 0.3 0.3 �9 0:8 2.1 5.0 9.9 2 A9.••••r, •{' 6° 9 4.1 2.7 1.7 1.3 1ti0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.9 2l7 3.5 3.9 3.6 2.8 2'2 2.0 tit. ` 3.6 6.3 11.3 J4 %j ti 1.7 6.5 r3 �9 1.9 1.11 0.6 0.9 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0 O*! 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 b.l 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 •0.5 1.2 2.5 4.7 8.9 10.3 6.8 5.0 .5 4 5.3 3.3 1.9 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.8' 2,3 3.8 �.� X11`3.9 .2r 'Y5.7 '8.� •J_4.1 2.1 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 ' , ■ � � r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7• •'1 .•2 2.0 3.1 9.9 4.5 3.1 3.9 4. 5.9 3.6 2.2 1.5 1.1 1.0 1�2 t�� 1.9 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.5 2.0 3.1 5.6 10.1 19� 112.2 7.1 3.7 2. 1.1 , 0.6 0.4 0.2 .2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •'• Fes'' ' = � '� - 7. � � y � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0. .1 0.1 0�1 0.1 0.2 � 0.9 0.6 1.0 1.9 1.8 - 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.5 2.9 5.1 D5. 5.2 9.3 2.6 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.•i 1,>- - 1.1 1 i.2-•�1.5 2.3 3.5 5.5 6.9 6.6 9.7 z 2,,2 �i.l�O 0 6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 .0 0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � _ �J.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2'' 0.3 0. 0.7 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.8 6 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.5 9.0 5 D ° 5.2 3.0 1.9 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.2" 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.5 3.5 2.8 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.32 0.1 0.1 0 0.0 � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 �.4 0:5 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.30. D '• 5.1 3.6 '• -7.2--7 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.9 1.6 2.0 2.1 1.� 1.9 ! 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.2 0�1• 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 D.�_ 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0� .9 .6 0.9 1.7 3.2 9.6� � 9 4.4 2.5 1.5 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.9 0. 0. 0.2 0.1• 0.1 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tiz � ° _ r _ D r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.1 •0.1'ti0�ti•0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 � 0. 0.8 1.4 2.5 9.9 6.5 .6 9.3 2.2 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.4 1.9 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0. 0.1 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 O.L ,0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3� 0.7 1.2 2.1 9.1 5.� 4.3 1.9 1.1 1.5 1.9 � 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.8 .4 0.2 0�� 0.1 0.1 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0�0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.6 1.0 1.8 3.1 9.8 4.3 1.6 1.8 3.0 3.4 2.9 2.1 1.3 0.'7 0.3 0.2 � 0.1 .1 0.1• 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 p.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 5 0.8 1.5 2.6 9.9 Sa -6.1.2.7 1.8 3.5: 6.5 6.8-- 4.7 2.6 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0. 0.1 ■ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �' f�. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.7 1.2 2.3 9.0 .0 ° ° �1- 1.8 2.2 5.9 2.3 •d'1.2 6.0 2.7 9 0.3 0.� 0.1 0.1 GT1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0�1 0.1 0.1�',-Ori �0.2 0.3 0.4 0.� 1.9 3.2 5. ° �.9 D 2.5 1.3 2.4 6.3 11.9 10.1 5.3 2 .6 0.2 0.1 .1 0.1,. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LL 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 5 0. 9 1.4 2.7 2.4 1.2 1.0 2,1 9.9 6.7 6.1 3.3 1.1 0.4 17.2 0. 0.1 +0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � L yy 1 �1•.5 1 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.1 Oil 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.{ O�C� � 0 8 2�5 3.5 3.3 0 6 O�r 0.1 0.1 0.1•• 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � r r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.6 1.0 1.�1. 9 1. 1.0 0.9 0.2 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0_ _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 .6 0�2 0. 0.1 �0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.� , �.0 00, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.6 0.7 0 6 fl� 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '�9, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 Q, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 - 0.3 0.9 •. O.S�• _-Q.2 0.1� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r iFl " w 1w H O •i O O ro ❑ v w 1� O ro h A 7 7 w ,C LL C U b N G a O ro.i H U Grl N+ O N O N A 0.0 H . W o m a H a b N A N m v v w° m -.ci 4 W O m m� H b� ti -H '•i C v a.aHiaa1' N v'" a E H JL E ro m A C svi b G .i >. m O ,a m a w +� H ro.� -�u❑N ° av rnw° .c sroi v a° o a v +� +� ro .N .i a o a O H a G E ro N H A .i rl v ro O G row va H o+� roa a O d o aai c a ro m >a H a A W N U O P ti o v H o H G a o r. a N N> N 3 N 0 7 a ro a a a aN A m a mN avw.c v ro cti U G m Vi 1� G N ti ro G C fOL G W H 3 v A b 06.0 FC ro 1� A m W -N a C m E m H O N v o G W x a a w m G 0 W M> C G 0 U .G1 H ro N 'O .0 U O U N m b 0 G O H N N "�O .roi .i W-0 w 7 >r W m v v H N W G C G U N N N w W > N w O E a N e w O n G a a U 0 1 w O O ro A a a w G m y P� v N N w m > w e -H v o v 'd C) ro N H> -H 0.c,�.� a a' O m W a w H G O '>IS O W N SLE N .0 N.i .� ro U >r a G HO W .1 w 4 H h. " A G O '� a a E m> H W v N H H> a a W .0 v N 0 N O N W >r N b W o !L H %H a .n G 10 w a o 1�i.ci rtis IL In Q m /� v J m L1. C �I� V Q (� (n O O O m N Z Lu m Ir 01 c N o %N O Q N Y C _ C7 (6 � � Q m y 7 � O _ T J&P IL J U a O C� � C U J Q E .�. C10 O Z O E L U N o 96 1 J> o N N C N N 7 O N c N N 7 O a 0 NN 7 Z � w 1 L. L I L U) � U U E sz � a IL a Y LN Scale: 1 inch= 29 Ft. f rf f • ell. ,tom L � i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0�0 �0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.fO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0Oe0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.0C�$1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 � a�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 ■ 0.0 0.0 �,0•L 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.d � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � 0� .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o� o.o -o.a o.o o.o o.o o. o.o � �o o.o o.o o.o •o. o.o o.o o.o o.o a.o o.o a.a•�o.o o.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.®.,� � o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o d�e.o� o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o •.o o.0 0.0 �0 0.0 0.0,' -0-0 ' • o``.o .o o. o.o Jo'o o.0 0.0 0.0 0 .o o. o.o o.o o. a.o o.o a.a 0.0 0.o O.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.a o_o �io�,o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o�06.0 �_o.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.o�o.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.o,o.oo.oo.oo.ooo.ooa.a.oa.ao.oo.oo.o�o.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.oo.�o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o, o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o f � r � - - T I�Ii BIZ � � o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o •o.o o .o �d.o •o.o o.o o.o oa.o o.o o.o o.o o.o, o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 'bio tid ro -o.o _ o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o• o.o o.o o.o o.o- = a�� P. p• =7 o o.o o.o o.o o a.a a. o.o o.o o.o o.o -0o ~cr.•o o.o a.o o.o o.o o:o o.o -o .Ao.o- � v.o• o.a o.o o.o �.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o.o o.o o o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o � •''�� " r`.1 - o.o °oa� o.o o.dl� o.o o.o o.o o�.o �o.o o.o o.o o.o �.a5� YfCY o' o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.� o.o o.o o.o _o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 ; .0 0.0 •.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 X0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.01. :Q.O -Al 0.0 0 '1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '� D. ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Z f • � L 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0� 0.0 0.0 0 � 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0'■i � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.O.P. 0 0.0 .� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ��~ b�.0 0 �_L Ld.O - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � • �. TMJ LL � �L� • � � -o.7 - - � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0• 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 -•• � 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -o 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0•.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /�O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 •0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a0 0.0 �• 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � � � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 _ 0.1 0.1 0.1 � � '1 ti 0:1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.-0 x••0.0 0.-0 �1 �= r;, ri 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0� 0.0 0.0 •T •� � 11i� � I r �rL • • � � _ r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /00o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0,'0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0.0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0 0.1 ti 0.2 0.1 0.10��0.�0� 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,•0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 6.0 1.5� 0. �.• 0.1 0.1 � Q•.R 1 r 0.1 r �.1 '•. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0 0.1 0.5 1.3 1.3 0.7 0.3 0.� 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 r• r � ® '�•i� tirrr1.7 +r �, _ r_r 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •'0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 �0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 r 7.8 9.9 2.3 0 6 0.3'-•0 .'2•,.Ip.2'•'•�.1� � Ll ' OJl 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 ••'L _ - 1.1 4.5- 9.6 1.7 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 Or Oa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.�r .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0� � 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 'S'•� 0.9 2.1 2.6 1.2 0.5 0.3 0�• .:.9F .2 0.1 OZ1 �.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 X0.0 0 1 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0�0 0.0 .0 7.5 2.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.3: 0.3• 0.2 ti•p.2 •: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 O.l�r 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 � , ` 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 .1 0.0••L0.0 0.0 0.0 • .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 �0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 �•' 7.2 9.5 2.5 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0. 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 G•. �, •'JJ.2 �.1� •0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 p.l 0.1 0.1 � 10:1•.•,Q ...7_ 0.1 0. .i. 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.1 O.Or 0.0 .0 ff 1 J ti i •• .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 } 0'�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 T.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 L 0.9 1.8 2.4 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 '.:I . •'„�1r2 0.2 1,0.7. 0.1 0.1 0.1 �.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 �"(til• f 9,.b 0.1 0.1 f 2.6 2.1 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0 0.0 ` 0.� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.� 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 8.7 2.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 ■1.£ • 3.9 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.7 0. 0.9 0.3 0.3J r•0,3 ••0�2 t,(}r2 r•; 0.2 • -0.1 0.1 �.1 0.1 • O, i■ 0.1 �0.j •• 0.1 0.1 d. 1. • OI ;L ti3O.1 0.1 � T9.7 t.7 1.4 0.7 3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 71 } S 1■�`�,51.'F� I r� 1 : • L • . L ._ i • 1 1 • L �. - ' "' 1 . . • F • ~ 1 r ••0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 0.0 .0 ` 6.3 9.2 2.5 0.8 .5 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 Z�0 2.9�I,��j 2.2 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.6 0. 0.9 :��4_ 0.3 0.3 •0.2� �.2: •0 A 0.� � 0.1 0.1 0.1 1d.1 0.1 0.1' 0.'1 0.1. 1_0�� ~. d; 0,r.�A,.1� •'' � 2.0 3.0 2.2 1.3 0. 0.3 0.2 � 0.1 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 '1 -r � r- • , , _ 1 •, � ' 1 -J 1 1 1 r ti■ _-J •• '1 •' _ • 0.0. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 1.0 1.6 2.2 1.2 � D. 0. 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.1 - 9.9 4.8 9.0 2.9 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0. 0.9 0.9 0..3 0.2 0.2 p.2• �.1 0.1 �.1 0.��1 i 0.1 �0.1 0.0 0.0 •'0.1• •,0 ±1•; •'•�.L 1.3 1.5 1.2 0.8 .5 0.3 X0.2 0. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 10.1 2.6 0.9 0.7 .5 0.9 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.6} 5.0 �3 10.0 4.7 2.8 1.8 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2• d.2�.2 -� 0.1 r�.9-R 0.1-' 0.1 L d".1 0' /0.1 0.1 0.0 •�0.0 0.0 -r 0..0 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.� 0.1 0.1 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 d.0 0 0.0 '� 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0 �` f 5.2 8.7 2.7 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.9 .5 0.7 1 •1.8 3.4 �6.7 12.8 1 � 7.2 3.8 2.2 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 0 9 �;7}�•' 0. 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.21• •tir0.•c�r _�� 1 0.1 0.1 0.' ••• ? 0.1- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .2 0.3 0.4 0. 0.3 0.2 i 0.1 .1 0.1� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.l•1• 0.2 0. 1.2 1.6 2.1 1.3 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.x''•11; 1 1.8 3.2 tir3.0 19.1 15.0 8.1 �.� 4 _ 1.7 1.6 - 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.6, � S'f2 0.9 0.7 0.5 .5 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 12-1, `�1• •yP.l 0,.1 0.1 •0.1 0.'1} 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2- .2 0.2 • .0.1 0. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1� �0.2 0 9 0.7 1. f 13.1 3.2 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 ••0.7� }.0 1.5 2.6 4.6 8.2 1 11.3�IT11�3 ~ Osi 6.2 3.6 2.3 1.7" L2.0 2.9 3.1 3.6 3.9� 2.8 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 � t1'�T� 0.6 0. 0.4 i.4 3 ' 0.2'•.•0.20_1 - 0.-1 0.1 'Q.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 D� 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Oro 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -116 1 ' ' • 1 �•�' *IJI�L '-111 ,1 4} ' ' 1 �� . i1 � • . J? cc 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .i 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.3 2. 3.9 7.5 2.9 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.8 0. 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.9 2.9 9.3 5.5• Y.9 4.1 ��Lz-1 1.9 2.3 3.9 7.0 �.} 4.9 3.1 2.0 1.9 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 ■0.9 0,.3 � 1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.� 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 or ..0 0.0 .1 0.1 0.2��_0.3 0.7 1.3 2.5 4.6 2. � 1.1 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.3 �4 0.7 9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.1 1.9 ~ 2�6 9.9 8.1 13_0 1�6 9.8 2.7 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 ®.9 •- 0.3, Oat 0.2 0.1 0.10 �1 �.1 0.1 •.1 0.0 �•0 0. 0.0 X0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.0 0.0 O.G �-rf"0,{- 0.0 0.1 12 0.3 0.6 1.1 2.0 2$ 2.9 1. � 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.9,2.5 0.3 0.9 2.6 � 4.0 2.9 1.5 1.0 - 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.7 9.,8 �6 17. 1�.,5• 12.0 6�1 Z 42.1 I i.7 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.0 0.7 .5 0.9 0. 0.2 P.1 �'1 {.1 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0,-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 'i1� 0.0 0.0 •0.0• S�� 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1� 0. 0. 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.3 0.8 0.4 •• 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.7 3.`6� �F.� • � .} ti r ' 9 D ° 4.7 3.3 1.9 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.5 2.3 9.0 7-5 13.0 14.91 10.2 5.6 3.2 2. 2 2.0 2.3 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.2 2.9 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 � N,v-1y� 0.0 0 0.0 � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • r.7 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 �„0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.6 0.7 0. 0.5 0 �3 0.3 .4 1.2 3.3 6.8 9.4 �$,•'� �• � D o 6.2 3.8 2.2 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Tl.R Z �'.� -- .8 9!5 6.7 7.7 6. 9.2 ti .Z„7 2.1 2 6.6 7.3 6.1 3.9 2.9 1■5 0.9 0. 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.1 .1 � .O 0.0 X4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Iti ti , r- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A7.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 �4�3_ 0.3 0.3 �9 0:8 2.1 5.0 9.9 2 A9.••••r, •{' 6° 9 4.1 2.7 1.7 1.3 1ti0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.9 2l7 3.5 3.9 3.6 2.8 2'2 2.0 tit. ` 3.6 6.3 11.3 J4 %j ti 1.7 6.5 r3 �9 1.9 1.11 0.6 0.9 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0 O*! 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 b.l 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 •0.5 1.2 2.5 4.7 8.9 10.3 6.8 5.0 .5 4 5.3 3.3 1.9 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.8' 2,3 3.8 �.� X11`3.9 .2r 'Y5.7 '8.� •J_4.1 2.1 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 ' , ■ � � r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7• •'1 .•2 2.0 3.1 9.9 4.5 3.1 3.9 4. 5.9 3.6 2.2 1.5 1.1 1.0 1�2 t�� 1.9 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.5 2.0 3.1 5.6 10.1 19� 112.2 7.1 3.7 2. 1.1 , 0.6 0.4 0.2 .2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •'• Fes'' ' = � '� - 7. � � y � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0. .1 0.1 0�1 0.1 0.2 � 0.9 0.6 1.0 1.9 1.8 - 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.5 2.9 5.1 D5. 5.2 9.3 2.6 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.•i 1,>- - 1.1 1 i.2-•�1.5 2.3 3.5 5.5 6.9 6.6 9.7 z 2,,2 �i.l�O 0 6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 .0 0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � _ �J.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2'' 0.3 0. 0.7 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.8 6 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.5 9.0 5 D ° 5.2 3.0 1.9 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.2" 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.5 3.5 2.8 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.32 0.1 0.1 0 0.0 � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 �.4 0:5 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.30. D '• 5.1 3.6 '• -7.2--7 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.9 1.6 2.0 2.1 1.� 1.9 ! 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.2 0�1• 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 D.�_ 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0� .9 .6 0.9 1.7 3.2 9.6� � 9 4.4 2.5 1.5 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.9 0. 0. 0.2 0.1• 0.1 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tiz � ° _ r _ D r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.1 •0.1'ti0�ti•0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 � 0. 0.8 1.4 2.5 9.9 6.5 .6 9.3 2.2 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.4 1.9 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0. 0.1 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 O.L ,0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3� 0.7 1.2 2.1 9.1 5.� 4.3 1.9 1.1 1.5 1.9 � 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.8 .4 0.2 0�� 0.1 0.1 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0�0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.6 1.0 1.8 3.1 9.8 4.3 1.6 1.8 3.0 3.4 2.9 2.1 1.3 0.'7 0.3 0.2 � 0.1 .1 0.1• 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 p.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 5 0.8 1.5 2.6 9.9 Sa -6.1.2.7 1.8 3.5: 6.5 6.8-- 4.7 2.6 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0. 0.1 ■ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �' f�. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.7 1.2 2.3 9.0 .0 ° ° �1- 1.8 2.2 5.9 2.3 •d'1.2 6.0 2.7 9 0.3 0.� 0.1 0.1 GT1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0�1 0.1 0.1�',-Ori �0.2 0.3 0.4 0.� 1.9 3.2 5. ° �.9 D 2.5 1.3 2.4 6.3 11.9 10.1 5.3 2 .6 0.2 0.1 .1 0.1,. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LL Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Tag Label Arrangement Lum. Lumens Arr. Lum. Lumens LLF Description Lum. Watts Arr. Watts Total Watts Filename � 6 S SLIM37 SINGLE 3905 3905 1.000 SLIM37 35.3 35.3 211.8 SLIM37 -Cool - RAB02437.IES 0 48 D dsk34-6r16_5940120ws SINGLE 1269 1269 1.000 dsk34-6r16_5940120ws 16.7101 16.7101 802.0848 dsk34-6r16.5940120ws.ies rm[H 2 A a17 -3t150 SINGLE 21180 21180 1.000 A17 -3T150 149.08 149.08 298.16 a17-3050.ies 20 [EpwEH 5 A2 588.604 182.369 3 A2 a17 -4t150 2 @ 180 BACK -BACK 21117 42234 1.000 A17 -4T150 149.17 298.34 895.02 a17-4t150.ies 301.11 215.982 2 T SLIM57 SINGLE 5579 5579 1.000 SLIM57 48.7 48.7 97.4 SLIM57 -Cool - RAB02604.IES * * *LAYOUT AND BOM ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Description PtSpcLr PtSpcTb Meter Type CalcPts 1 Illuminance Fc 0.64 20.2 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings Taken 0'-0" AFG 10 10 Horizontal NOTES: * The light loss factor (LLF) is a product of many variables, only lamp lumen depreciation (LLD) has been applied to the calculated results unless otherwise noted. The LLD is the result (quotient) of mean lumens / initial lumens per lamp manufacturers' specifications. * Illumination values shown (in footcandles) are the predicted results for planes of calculation either to the plane of calculation. * The calculated results of this lighting simulation represent an anticipated prediction of system performance. Actual measured results may vary from the anticipated performance and are subject to means and methods which are beyond the control of the designer. * Mounting height determination is job site specific, our lighting simulations assume a mounting height (insertion point of the luminaire symbol) to be taken at the top of the symbol for ceiling mounted luminaires and at the bottom of the symbol for all other luminaire mounting configurations. * RAB Lighting Inc. luminaire and product designs are protected under U.S. and International intellectual property laws. horizontal, vertical or inclined as designated in the calculation summary. Meter orientation is normal Patents issued or pending apply. Expanded Luminaire Location Summary LumNo Tag X Y MTG HT Orient 1 A 259.961 190.898 20 143.746 2 A 578.765 80.071 20 337.166 3 A2 399.879 268.789 20 59.42 3 A2 398.353 266.207 20 239.42 4 A2 495.391 224.303 20 63.159 4 A2 494.037 221.627 20 243.159 5 A2 589.644 185.183 20 69.718 5 A2 588.604 182.369 20 249.718 6 D 310.037 217.621 10 0 7 D 301.11 215.982 10 0 8 D 322.146 212.373 10 0 9 D 334.256 207.125 10 0 10 D 295.622 204.197 10 0 11 D 346.365 201.876 10 0 12 D 358.474 196.628 10 0 13 D 290.134 192.413 10 0 14 D 370.584 191.38 10 0 15 D 382.693 186.132 10 0 16 D 394.802 180.884 10 0 17 D 284.646 180.628 10 0 18 D 406.912 175.635 10 0 19 D 289.183 170.864 10 0 20 D 419.021 170.387 10 0 21 D 301.292 165.616 10 0 22 D 431.13 165.139 10 0 23 D 313.402 160.368 10 0 24 D 443.239 159.891 10 0 25 D 325.511 155.119 10 0 26 D 455.349 154.642 10 0 27 D 337.62 149.871 10 0 28 D 467.458 149.394 10 0 29 D 349.73 144.623 10 0 30 D 479.567 144.146 10 0 31 D 361.839 139.375 10 0 32 D 491.677 138.898 10 0 33 D 373.948 134.127 10 0 34 D 503.786 133.65 10 0 35 D 386.058 128.878 10 0 36 D 515.895 128.401 10 0 37 D 398.167 123.63 10 0 38 D 528.005 123.153 10 0 39 D 410.276 118.382 10 0 40 D 540.114 117.905 10 0 41 D 422.385 113.134 10 0 42 D 544.928 108.058 10 0 43 D 434.495 107.885 10 0 44 D 446.604 102.637 10 0 45 D 458.713 97.389 10 0 46 D 539.44 96.273 10 0 47 D 470.823 92.141 10 0 48 D 482.932 86.893 10 0 49 D 533.952 84.489 10 0 50 D 495.041 81.644 10 0 51 D 507.151 76.396 10 0 52 D 528.464 72.704 10 0 53 D 519.26 71.148 10 0 54 S 352.364 368.236 10 313.152 55 S 722 353 12 63.039 56 S 322.799 339.127 10 315 57 S 293.234 310.018 10 314.997 Total Quantity: 64 ( 60 shown, 1 through 60 ) 70 0 M CZ 0 U) U) 0 U 0 M Z 0 0 U_ Q 1 W H O 1 O O b G N N o 1 ro N A 7 7 w C a G U O H N G a ro H U Grl W + O N O N A E N QI a N N O H G G W N O m mH �ti �'•i G E N H o v m v P H U H u o H H c o EN N 47 m rn w 1811-o a N G o H ri N N o+ �.Ei N N o E C o'..i row va H +� ma N A N O o c o N a m m.°a oA W �o sro,�.na � �ov�a�bvo H a A w o ro c o a ti o 0 o H o H G a E o a N o> N 3 N ro a Na N.�arow.cvm c.i N G N W a .{ QJ N 1J G ro ti ro G G fOL G W H 3 0� N o o4 o N ro A G N w b N H a 0 5 a H . .N U o G.i N N W N N E E is - -NO o" U . G 1 H b U O U N N b o G O 7r W' N ro ro H N W G G G U N N N w W '> N w o E a N} O N G a a O O ro h v a o N N N P N N u >+ W a > H N >r O H W C -H N O N Id I N w D a' O H o W a w N G U O a ro a E ro .0 ro .N� ro U �+ a G Ho ,C W N N O w.".1 ." tr) U ro- aa �a> a.0 a." a H> a a w c v ro o N oo H a.n G w o a o .I rt M N O N ti 0 EM -1 0 L 0 J � I U) CO U o co 5 2 m Eco m LL � A17 -3T150 Color: Bronze Technical Specifications Compliance LIL Listed: Suitable for wet locations IESNA LM -79 & LM -80 Testing: RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM -79 and LM -80. IP Rating: Ingress protection rating of IP65 for dust and water DLC Listed: This product is listed by Design Lights Consortium (DLC) as an ultra -efficient premium product that qualifies for the highest tier of rebates from DLC Member Utilities. Designed to meet DLC 5.1 requirements. DLC Product Code: PLHVLH9ZGFNP Electrical Driver: Constant Current, Class 2,120-277V, 50/60Hz, 120V 1.50A, 208V: 0.70A, 240V: 0.70A, 277V: 0.60A Dimming Driver: Driver includes dimming control wiring for 0-10V dimming systems. Requires separate 0-10V DC dimming circuit. Dims down to 10%. THD: 3.96% at 120V, 8.22% at 277V Weight: 13.2 lbs Power Factor: 99.8% at 120V, 95.6% at 277V Surge Protection: 10kV Performance Project: T pe: Prepared By: Date: J Driver Info Type Constant Current 120V 1.50A 208V 0.80A 240V 0.70A 277V 0.06A Input Watts 149.1 W Lifespan: 100,000 -Hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations Construction IES Classification: The Type III distribution is ideal for roadway, general parking and other area lighting applications where a larger pool of lighting is required. It is intended to be located near the side of the area, allowing the light to project outward and fill the area. Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is -40°C (-40°F) Maximum Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in up to 40°C (104°F) Lens: Polycarbonate lens LED Info Watts 150W Color Temp 5000K (Cool) Color Accuracy 70 CRI L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours Lumens 21,5941m Efficacy 144.81m/W Housing: Die-cast aluminum housing, lens frame and mounting arm Vibration Rating: 3G vibration rating per ANSI C136.31 EPA: 1 Fixture: 0.46 2 Fixtures at 90°: 0.60 2 Fixtures at 180°: 0.93 3 Fixtures at 90°: 0.93 4 Fixtures at 90°: 0.93 EPA with Slipfitter & Adjustable Arm Mounting Accessories (Sold Separately) 1 Fixture: 0.66 2 Fixtures at 90°: 0.80 2 Fixtures at 180°: 1.32 3 Fixtures at 90°: 1.32 4 Fixtures at 90°: 1.32 Mounting: Universal mounting arm compatible for hole spacing patterns from 1" to 5 1/2" center to center. Round Pole Adaptor plate included as a standard. Easy slide and lock to mount fixture with ease. Round pole diameter must be >4" to mount fixtures at 90° orientation. Finish: Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 3 A17 -3T150 Technical Specifications (continued) Green Technology: Mercury and UV free. RoHS-compliant components. LED Characteristics LEDs: Long -life, high -efficiency, surface -mount LEDs Color Uniformity. RAB's range of Correlated Color Temperature follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting (SSL) Products, ANSI C78.377-2017. Optical BUG Rating: B3 UO G3 Other 5 Yr Limited Warranty: The RAB 5 -year, limited warranty covers light output, driver performance and paint finish. RAB's warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found at rabliahtina.com/warranty. Buy American Act Compliance: RAB values USA manufacturing! Upon request, RAB may be able to manufacture this product to be compliant with the Buy American Act (BAA). Please contact customer service to request a quote for the product to be made BAA compliant. Dimensions Features 0-10V Dimming, standard 100,000 -hour LED lifespan 5 -Year, limited warranty Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 3 A17 -3T150 Ordering Matrix Family Distribution Wattage/Lumens Mounting Color Temp Driver Options A17 JLJ 3T 150 3T= Type 111 70= 70W/10,000LM Blank= Universal Pole Mount Blank= 5000K Cool Blank= 120-277V, 0-10V Blank= No Option 4T=Type IV 100=100W/15,000LM SF= Slipfitter (Factory installed N = 4000K Neutral Dimming /3PR5=3-pin Receptacle and 5T=Type V 150= 150W/21,50OLM SF available in 150W) /480=480V, 0-10V Shorting Cap 200=200W/30,000LM Dimming' /7PRS=7-pin Receptacle and 240=240W/36,000LM Shorting Cap 300= 300W/45,000LM /MVS = Microwave Motion 375 = 375W/51,800LM Sensor /LC = Lightcloud® Controller 480V driver available standard on 150W and 300W and by special order on 100, 240 and 375W. Not available on 70W or 200W models. Type 11 distribution available as special order Wall mount and adjustable universal pole mount available as optional field -installed accessories Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright © 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice Page 3 of 3 Al 7-4T1 50 Color: Bronze Technical Specifications Compliance LIL Listed: Suitable for wet locations IESNA LM -79 & LM -80 Testing: RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM -79 and LM -80. IP Rating: Ingress protection rating of IP65 for dust and water DLC Listed: This product is listed by Design Lights Consortium (DLC) as an ultra -efficient premium product that qualifies for the highest tier of rebates from DLC Member Utilities. Designed to meet DLC 5.1 requirements. DLC Product Code: PLAI7VEVOJ4H Electrical Driver: Constant Current, Class 2,120-277V, 50/6OHz, 120V: 1.50A, 208V: 0.70A, 240V: 0.70A, 277V: 0.60A Dimming Driver: Driver includes dimming control wiring for 0-10V dimming systems. Requires separate 0-1 OV DC dimming circuit. Dims down to 10%. THD: 3.54% at 120V, 9.1 % at 277V Weight: 13.2 lbs Power Factor: 99.7% at 120V, 93.2% at 277V Surge Protection: IOkV Performance Project: T pe: Prepared By: Date: J Driver Info Type Constant Current 120V 1.50A 208V 0.80A 240V 0.70A 277V 0.06A Input Watts 149.2W Lifespan: 100,000 -Hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations Construction IES Classification: The Type IV distribution (also known as a Forward Throw) is especially suited for mounting on the sides of buildings and walls, and for illuminating the perimeter of parking areas. It produces a semicircular distribution with essentially the same candlepower at lateral angles from 90° to 270°. Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is -40°C (-40°F) Maximum Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in up to 40°C (1047) Lens: Polycarbonate lens LED Info Watts 150W Color Temp 5000K (Cool) Color Accuracy 70 CRI L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours Lumens 21,3781m Efficacy 143.31m/W Housing: Die-cast aluminum housing, lens frame and mounting arm Vibration Rating: 3G vibration rating per ANSI C136.31 EPA: 1 Fixture: 0.46 2 Fixtures at 90°: 0.60 2 Fixtures at 180°: 0.93 3 Fixtures at 90°: 0.93 4 Fixtures at 90°: 0.93 EPA with Slipfitter & Adjustable Arm Mounting Accessories (Sold Separately) 1 Fixture: 0.66 2 Fixtures at 90°: 0.80 2 Fixtures at 180°: 1.32 3 Fixtures at 90°: 1.32 4 Fixtures at 90°: 1.32 Mounting: Universal mounting arm compatible for hole spacing patterns from 1" to 5 1/2" center to center. Round Pole Adaptor plate included as a standard. Easy slide and lock to mount fixture with ease. Round pole diameter must be >4" to mount fixtures at 90° orientation. Finish: Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 3 Al 7-4T1 50 Technical Specifications (continued) Green Technology: Mercury and UV free. RoHS-compliant components. LED Characteristics LEDs: Long -life, high -efficiency, surface -mount LEDs Color Uniformity. RAB's range of Correlated Color Temperature follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting (SSL) Products, ANSI C78.377-2017. Optical BUG Rating: B3 UO G4 Other 5 Yr Limited Warranty: The RAB 5 -year, limited warranty covers light output, driver performance and paint finish. RAB's warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found at rabliahtina.com/warranty. Buy American Act Compliance: RAB values USA manufacturing! Upon request, RAB may be able to manufacture this product to be compliant with the Buy American Act (BAA). Please contact customer service to request a quote for the product to be made BAA compliant. Dimensions Features 0-10V Dimming, standard 100,000 -hour LED lifespan 5 -Year, limited warranty Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 3 Al 7-4T150 Ordering Matrix Family Distribution Wattage/Lumens Mounting Color Temp Driver Options A17 JLJ 4T 150 3T= Type 111 70= 70W/10,000LM Blank= Universal Pole Mount Blank= 5000K Cool Blank= 120-277V, 0-10V Blank= No Option 4T=Type IV 100=100W/15,000LM SF= Slipfitter (Factory installed N = 4000K Neutral Dimming /3PR5=3-pin Receptacle and 5T=Type V 150= 150W/21,50OLM SF available in 150W) /480=480V, 0-10V Shorting Cap 200=200W/30,000LM Dimming' /7PRS=7-pin Receptacle and 240=240W/36,000LM Shorting Cap 300= 300W/45,000LM /MVS = Microwave Motion 375 = 375W/51,800LM Sensor /LC = Lightcloud® Controller 480V driver available standard on 150W and 300W and by special order on 100, 240 and 375W. Not available on 70W or 200W models. Type 11 distribution available as special order Wall mount and adjustable universal pole mount available as optional field -installed accessories Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright © 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice Page 3 of 3 DSK34-6R1695012OWS Technical Specifications Performance Product Type: Disk Surface Mount / Retrofit Input Wattage: 16W Lumens (Nominal): 1,000 Lm Efficacy: 62.5 Lm/W LEDs: Backlit LED Technology Lifespan: 50,000 -Hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations Wattage Equivalency: 75W LED Characteristics Color Accuracy (CRI): 90 CRI R9 Value: High color performance with R9 greater than or equal to 50 Color Temperature: 5000K Electrical THD: 55% Power Factor: >0.9 Dimmable: TRIAC and ELV dimming compatibility Input Voltage: 120V Operating Frequency: 60Hz Operating Temperature: -30°C - 40°C Construction Size: 6" Shape: Round Housing Material: Stamped aluminum construction RAB I Residential Project: T pe: Prepared By: Date: J Driver Info Type Constant Current 120V 166mA 208V N/A 240V N/A 277V N/A Input Watts 16W Finish: White Trim Style: Smooth LED Info Watts 16W Color Temp 5000K Color Accuracy 90 CRI L70 Lifespan 50,000 Hours Lumens 1,1611m Efficacy 62.5 Lens: Toolless, twist -and -lock frosted polycarbonate diffusion lens Optical Beam Angle: 110° Other Note: All values are typical (tolerance +/- 10%) Technology EQ: Incandescent Base Type: E26 socket availabe as separate retrofit accessory Warranty: The RAB 5 -year, limited warranty covers light output, driver performance and paint finish. RAB's warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found at rablighting.com/warranty. Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 3 DSK34-6R1695012OWS Technical Specifications (continued) Buy American Act Compliance: Model Number for Certification: RAB values USA manufacturing! Upon request, RAB DLS0058(DSK34-6R16950120WS) may be able to manufacture this product to be compliant with the Buy American Act (BAA). Please contact customer service to request a quote for the product to be made BAA compliant. Installation Mounting: Install from below design. Suitable for installation in many. 3-1/2" and 4" octagon and roundelectrical junction boxes. Compatible with compact/pancakejunction boxes. Bracket Adapter, Screws, and wire nuts included. Compliance Safety Listing: UL Listed, UL Classified Environment: Damp Fixture Rating: Open IC Rated: Suitable for direct contact with insulation Energy Star Approved: This product is ENERGY STAR® Version 2.2 Certified. T24 JAB Compliant: Can be used to conform with the requirements of California Title 24 Part 6. RoHS: Mercury and UV free. Rol -IS -compliant components. FCC: Complies with Part 15B of the FCC Rules Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice RAB I Residential Page 2 of 3 DSK34-6R1695012OWS Dimensions 1 1/16' l6bmm 196mm Ordering Matrix Family Size Shape Wattage CRI/Color Temp Voltage JL6 DSK34 R,[ 16 ][ 950 120 4=4" R=Round 12=12W 950=90 CRI, 5000K 120=120V 6=6 14=14W 940=90 CRI, 4000K 16 = 16W 935 = 90 CRI, 3500K 16.5=16.5W 930=90 CRI, 3000K 927 = 90 CRI, 2700K RAB I Residential Features Super low profile backlit LED with driverless design Stamped aluminum housing New construction or retrofit applications Simple and quick installation from below the ceiling Installs on standard 4" and 6" junction boxes Can be retrofitted to existing downlight housings with option accessory Suitable for Damp locations Dimmable down to 5% on compatible dimmers 5 -Year, limited warranty Finish Trim W A0 W=White S=Smooth B = Black BR = Bronze BN = Brushed Nickel Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 3 of 3 SLIM37 37, 57 and 62 Watt SLIM Wall packs are designed to cover the footprint of most traditional wall packs. They are suitable for mounting heights from 20' to 30', and replace HID Wattages from 200W MH to 320W MH. These ultra-high efficiency fixtures are available in cutoff or full cutoff models. Color: Bronze Technical Specifications Compliance LIL Listed: Suitable for Wet Locations. Wall Mount Only. IP Rating: Ingress protection rating of IP66 for dust and water IESNA LM -79 & LM -80 Testing: RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM -79 and LM -80. DLC Listed: This product is listed by Design Lights Consortium (DLC) as an ultra -efficient premium product that qualifies for the highest tier of rebates from DLC Member Utilities. Designed to meet DLC 5.1 requirements. DLC Product Code: PYVKJZ59 Construction Footprint: Designed to replace RAB HID WPI wall packs, both in size and footprint template, so upgrading to LED is easy and seamless Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is -40°C (-40°F) Maximum Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in up to 40°C (104°F) Weight: 8.4 lbs Project: T pe: Prepared By: Date: J Driver Info Type Constant Current 120V 0.34A 208V 0.20A 240V 0.17A 277V 0.15A Input Watts 32.2W Housing: Precision die-cast aluminum housing and door frame Mounting: Die-cast back box with four (4) conduit entry points and knockout pattern forjunction box or direct wall mounting. Hinged housing and bubble level for easy installation. Cutoff- Cutoff utoffCutoff (10°) Recommended Mounting Height: Up to 20 ft. Lens: Microprismatic diffusion glass lens reduces glare and has smooth and even light distribution Reflector: Specular thermoplastic Gaskets: The unique design of the tight -lock gasket ensures no water or environmental elements will ever get inside the SLIM Finish: Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Green Technology: Mercury and UV free. RoHS-compliant components. LED Info Watts 37W Color Temp 5000K (Cool) Color Accuracy 74 CRI L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours Lumens 4,8071m Efficacy 149.3 LED Characteristics LED: Long -life, high -efficiency, micro -power, surface mount LEDs; binned and mixed for uniform light output and color Color Stability: LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more than 200K in color temperature over a 5 -year period Color Consistency: 7 -step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture -to -fixture color Electrical Driver: Constant Current, Class 2,120-277V, 50-60Hz,120V: 0.34A, 208V: 0.17A, 240V: 0.17A, 277V: 0.15A Dimming Driver: Driver includes dimming control wiring for 0-10V dimming systems. Requires separate 0-10V DC dimming circuit. Dims down to 10%. THD: 2.72% at 120V, 5.01 % at 277V Power Factor: 99.7% at 120V, 94.1 % at 277V Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 3 SLIM37 Technical Specifications (continued) Performance Lifespan: 100,000 -Hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations Wattage Equivalency: Equivalent to 150W Metal Halide Other Accessories: Available accessories include polyshield and wire guard. Click here to see all accessories. Patents: The design of the SLIM- is protected by patents pending in US, Canada, China, Taiwan and Mexico Warranty: RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of five (5) years from the date of delivery to the end user, including coverage of light output, color stability, driver performance and fixture finish. RAB's warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found at rablighting.com/warranty. HID Replacement Range: Replaces 200W Metal Halide Trade Agreements Act Compliant: This product is a product of Cambodia and a "designated country" end product that complies with the Trade Agreements Act Buy American Act Compliance: RAB values USA manufacturing! Upon request, RAB may be able to manufacture this product to be compliant with the Buy American Act (BAA). Please contact customer service to request a quote for the product to be made BAA compliant. Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 3 SLIM37 Dimensions 93• 235 mm Ordering Matrix 9. ' 127 mm 128 mm� Features Covers footprint of most traditional wall packs Easy installation with hinged access, bubble level and multiple conduit entries Tight -lock gasket keeps elements out 100,000 -hour LED lifespan 5 -Year, No -Compromise Warranty Family Cutoff Wattage Color Temp Finish Driver Options Options SLIM 01 �7 111 �C A Blank = Cutoff (10 degrees) 37=37W Blank=5000KCool Blank=Bronze Blank= Standard (120-277V) Blank= No Option FC = Full Cutoff (0 degrees) 57=57W N = 4000K Neutral W = White /BL = Bi -Level /PC =120V Button Photocell 62=62W Y=3000KWarm /D10=Dimmable /PC2 = 277V Button Photocell /480=480V /PCS=120V Swivel Photocell /PCS2 = 277V Swivel Photocell /LC= Lightcloud® Controller Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 3 of 3 SLIM57 37, 57 and 62 Watt SLIM Wall packs are designed to cover the footprint of most traditional wall packs. They are suitable for mounting heights from 20' to 30', and replace HID Wattages from 200W MH to 320W MH. These ultra-high efficiency fixtures are available in cutoff or full cutoff models. Color: Bronze Technical Specifications Compliance LIL Listed: Suitable for Wet Locations. Wall Mount Only. IP Rating: Ingress protection rating of IP66 for dust and water IESNA LM -79 & LM -80 Testing: RAB LED luminaires and LED components have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM -79 and LM -80. DLC Listed: This product is listed by Design Lights Consortium (DLC) as an ultra -efficient premium product that qualifies for the highest tier of rebates from DLC Member Utilities. Designed to meet DLC 5.1 requirements. DLC Product Code: PTE9YFBU Construction Footprint: Designed to replace RAB HID WP2 wall packs, both in size and footprint template, so upgrading to LED is easy and seamless Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is -40°C (-40°F) Maximum Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in up to 40°C (104°F) Weight: 11.9 lbs Project: T pe: Prepared By: Date: J Driver Info Type Constant Current 120V 0.48A 208V 0.28A 240V 0.24A 277V 0.21 A Input Watts 41.7W Housing: Precision die-cast aluminum housing and door frame Mounting: Die-cast back box with four (4) conduit entry points and knockout pattern forjunction box or direct wall mounting. Hinged housing and bubble level for easy installation. Cutoff- Cutoff utoffCutoff (10°) Recommended Mounting Height: Up to 25 ft. Lens: Microprismatic diffusion glass lens reduces glare and has smooth and even light distribution Reflector: Specular thermoplastic Gaskets: The unique design of the tight -lock gasket ensures no water or environmental elements will ever get inside the SLIM Finish: Formulated for high durability and long-lasting color Green Technology: Mercury and UV free. RoHS-compliant components. LED Info Watts 57W Color Temp 5000K (Cool) Color Accuracy 74 CRI L70 Lifespan 100,000 Hours Lumens 6,1501m Efficacy 147.5 LED Characteristics LED: Long -life, high -efficiency, micro -power, surface mount LEDs; binned and mixed for uniform light output and color Color Stability: LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more than 200K in color temperature over a 5 -year period Color Consistency: 7 -step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture -to -fixture color Electrical Driver: Constant Current, Class 2,120-277V, 50-60Hz,120V: 0.48A, 208V: 0.28A, 240V: 0.24A, 277V: 0.21 A Dimming Driver: Driver includes dimming control wiring for 0-10V dimming systems. Requires separate 0-10V DC dimming circuit. Dims down to 10%. THD: 2.46% at 120V, 5.84% at 277V Power Factor: 99.67% at 120V, 94.8% at 277V Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 1 of 3 SLIM57 Technical Specifications (continued) Performance Lifespan: 100,000 -Hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations Wattage Equivalency: Equivalent to 200W Metal Halide Other Accessories: Available accessories include polyshield and wire guard. Click here to see all accessories. Patents: The design of the SLIM- is protected by patents pending in US, Canada, China, Taiwan and Mexico Warranty: RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of five (5) years from the date of delivery to the end user, including coverage of light output, color stability, driver performance and fixture finish. RAB's warranty is subject to all terms and conditions found at rablighting.com/warranty. HID Replacement Range: Replaces 250W Metal Halide Trade Agreements Act Compliant: This product is a product of Cambodia and a "designated country" end product that complies with the Trade Agreements Act Buy American Act Compliance: RAB values USA manufacturing! Upon request, RAB may be able to manufacture this product to be compliant with the Buy American Act (BAA). Please contact customer service to request a quote for the product to be made BAA compliant. Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 2 of 3 SLIM57 Dimensions 355m/n�7 ,127 mm Ordering Matrix Features Covers footprint of most traditional wall packs Easy installation with hinged access, bubble level and multiple conduit entries Tight -lock gasket keeps elements out 100,000 -hour LED lifespan 5 -Year, No -Compromise Warranty Family Cutoff Wattage Color Temp Finish Driver Options Options SLIM 01 �7 111 �C A Blank = Cutoff (10 degrees) 37=37W Blank=5000KCool Blank=Bronze Blank= Standard (120-277V) Blank= No Option FC = Full Cutoff (0 degrees) 57=57W N = 4000K Neutral W = White /BL = Bi -Level /PC =120V Button Photocell 62=62W Y=3000KWarm /D10=Dimmable /PC2 = 277V Button Photocell /480=480V /PCS=120V Swivel Photocell /PCS2 = 277V Swivel Photocell /LC = Lightcloud® Controller Need help? Tech help line: (888) 722-1000 Email: sales@rablighting.com Website: www.rablighting.com Copyright o 2023 RAB Lighting All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at anytime without notice Page 3 of 3 D Z L x Z z X wsb August 25, 2023 Matt Leonard City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary/Final Plat and Civil Plans — Engineering Review City Project No. 2023-22 WSB Project No. 022968-000 Dear Mr. Leonard: We have reviewed the Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans submittal dated August 16, 2023. The applicant proposes to construct a new 50 -unit four story apartment project including a 70 -stall detached garage complex with a mix of cold and heated spaces. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Monticello's general engineering and stormwater treatment standards. We offer the following comments regarding these matters. City staff will provide additional comments under separate cover. Preliminary/Final Plat & General Comments 1. City staff and Fire Marshall will provide comments under separate cover. 2. With final plat submittal, provide a sheet with hatching for differing pavement types (streets, concrete walk, bituminous trails, etc.). Provide signing and striping sheet(s). 3. The building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements. 4. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments on the plans have been summarized in this review letter. Existing Conditions & Demolition Plans (Sheet C1) 5. The existing site and demolition plans will also need to include existing utility locations, pipe sizes, pipe material types, structure rim/invert elevations, etc. 6. Add more items to the legend including the linetypes for the various elements on the plans such as property lines, easement lines, setback lines, property corners, utility linetypes, etc. 7. Show a 2' strip of bituminous replacement adjacent to curb removals/replacement. 8. Show more contour labels for the areas south of the lot. K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.doex City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review August 25, 2023 Page 2 Site Plan (Sheet C2) 9. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures and required turnaround space as required by the Fire Marshall. Fire truck circulation will also need to accommodate the City's ladder truck. 10. Provide a pedestrian path along Elm Street and 7th Street adjacent to the development site. Also a pedestrian path is to be installed along the south side of 7th Street to or at a minimum, a connection to the adjacent existing sidewalks should be provided. 11. Show any proposed signage and lighting units on site plan. Add stop signs at the exit points of the site. 12. Turn off existing contouring on site plan for clarity. 13. Confirm whether or not there will be a monument sign and show location on plan. 14. Provide additional dimensioning examples of parking spaces. It appears there are at least two size variations proposed. 15. Provide more specific hatching in the legend for the various pavement types (i.e. 4" versus 6" concrete, standard versus heavy duty bituminous pavement, etc.) Grading & Drainage Plan (Sheet C3) 16. Label more of the proposed contours and the location of all EOF's. Locations of EOF's or other concentrated discharge point over vegetated areas will require a permanent energy dissipation/stabilization method such as rip -rap or permanent turf reinforcement matting. 17. Within handicapped accessible spaces or routes within the parking areas, the grade cannot exceed 2.0%. Provide more grading detail, spot elevations, or note(s) to reinforce this requirement. 18. With final construction plans, provide more spot elevations along curb lines, requisite with what would be required for a surveyor to provide construction staking. 19. Include additional drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runoff within vegetated areas. 20. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures. Utility Plan (Sheets C4) 21. Show more clearly (with thicker lines) where the water/sewer service extensions are located on the plan; currently, they are difficult to distinguish from the existing linework. 22. It is not clear what the existing valve configuration and hydrant location is with the existing water service, review and correct the plans. 23. Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will be required to apply for a permit from DLI, provide copies to the City. 24. Hydrant locations shall be reviewed and approved of by the City Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250' overlapping influence radius (maximum 400' spacing) is required along roadway (hose length). Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. 25. The watermain connections to the building shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV on the plan (if required). K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.doex City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review August 25, 2023 Page 3 26. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet. 27. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of: a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5'. e. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details. f. The City will require televising for sanitary and storm sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the City for review. Stormwater Management & Modelling (Sheet C5) 28. Provide the hydroCAD calculations with the final submittal to verify drainage areas, impervious and treatment capacity. 29. This site was designed to drain to the regional stormwater pond on the north side of 7th St. The pond will provide rate control for the site based on a curve number of 89. Complete, the site is shown to have a curve of 89 meeting requirements. 30. Sheet 5C references web soil survey for soils information, please Include soil borings to verify soil types and infiltration rates for the site along with separation from the ground water. Soils borings should be a minimum of 5' below the bottom of the proposed infiltration basins. 31. The new site will need to provide onsite volume control for runoff of 1.1" over the new impervious area, Pre-treatment measures are required prior to discharging to the volume control BMPs. a. Verification of soil infiltration rates is required. b. When designing an infiltration practice for volume control and water quality management, on-site testing and detailed analysis are strongly encouraged in order to determine the infiltration rates of the proposed infiltration facility. Documented site-specific infiltration or hydraulic conductivity measurements (double -ring infiltrometer) completed by a licensed soil scientist or engineer is required. 32. An operation and maintenance plan for all stormwater BMPs is required and should be submitted with the stormwater report for review. 33. The site is outside of the DWSMA and is not subject to requirements of the City's Wellhead Protection Plan. 34. Pretreatment, in the form of ponds, forebays, filter strips, or other approved methods, shall be provided for all infiltration areas. Currently rain guardian turrets are shown. K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review August 25, 2023 Page 4 Additional pretreatment will be required for the central infiltration basin to prevent maintenance issues in the future. CBMH 2 and 7 should be 4 foot sumps per City standards. 35. Provide a stabilized EOF route for the central infiltration basin. c. Emergency Overflows (EOFs) shall be sized with a minimum bottom width of five feet and 4:1 side slopes. Label all EOF locations on the plans. d. The maximum flow depth in EOFs shall be less than equal to one foot as calculated for a 100 -year back-to-back storm event. e. At least two feet of vertical separation is required from an area's emergency overflow elevation to the lowest opening of a building. Current plans show garage FIFE of 960 and an EOF elevation of 958. 36. For basins with a suitable outlet, freeboard will be two -feet above the HWL determined by modeling the 100 -year critical event. Verify HWL have a minimum of 2' from all structures. Erosion Control & SWPPP Plans (Sheets C6 & C7) 37. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future full plan set submittals. In progress, a more detailed review of erosion/sediment control and SWPPP will be conducted with future submittals. 38. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review (if required due to disturbance limits), prior to construction commencing. 39. Label redundant perimeter control around the stormwater treatment areas. Silt fence should be double layered to a 3 foot minimum separation and 5 foot maximum separation. Show a row of silt fence or bio -roll at the bottom of the slope around the perimeter of the infiltration areas. 40. Change line type or color on erosion control plan show erosion control BMP's clearly show up. Currently they blend into the contour lines. 41. Erosion control blanket is required for slopes 4:1 or greater. Construction Notes & Standard Details Plans (Sheets C8 & C9) 42. The pavement design/typical section shall be designed to meet the City's standard, at minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site and may need to include a thicker aggregate section and/or a sand section here the fire truck access route is intended. Provide details for the various pavement sections. 43. Provide details for the proposed stormwater treatment areas. A 4" layer of basic "topsoil" is not typically recommended with infiltration basins, reference the MN Stormwater Manual for preferred soil types and specifications. 44. Provide specific details for each of the control structures proposed. K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.doex City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review August 25, 2023 Page 5 45. Some details appear to be very light in color and may be difficult to read on printed hard copy, please review. 46. Use City details in all cases where practicable. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal. Traffic & Access 47. Five spaces must be dedicated as Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant in the indoor heated lot to meets the required amount for lots with a total of 101-150 parking spaces. Four spaces must be dedicated as ADA compliant in the outdoor lot to meet the required amount with a total of 76-100 parking spaces. Accessible parking spaces and aisles must meet all ADA requirements. 48. The site would generate approximately 227 daily trips, 19 AM peak hour trips and 20 PM peak hour trips. The existing Average Daily Traffic on 7t'' Street is 5300 and on Elm Street is 1550. The addition of the proposed traffic should not have an impact on roadway capacity or operations. 49. Provide a pedestrian path along Elm Street and 7th Street adjacent to the development site. Also, to provide connectivity, a pedestrian path is to be installed along the south side of 7th Street to or at a minimum, a connection to the adjacent existing sidewalks should be provided. 50. Provide a sight line exhibit at 71" Street access and show that intersection/driveway sight distances will be met. Wetlands & Buffers 51. A wetland delineation should be completed and submitted to the Local Government Unit (the City of Monticello) for review and approval. There is a mapped National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetland at the east side of the parcel. 52. If wetland impacts are proposed, a replacement plan must be submitted to the City of Monticello for Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) review. 53. The City has wetland buffer and setback rules that are based on the functional quality of the wetlands. If wetlands are identified on site, wetland buffers and setbacks will be required. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 612-419-1549 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB ;� Z'_�� Jim Stremel, P.E. Senior Project Manager K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-08-15 Submittal (Prelim & Final Plat)\_2023-08-25 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.doex wsb September 29, 2023 Matt Leonard City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary/Final Plat and Civil Plans — Engineering Review City Project No. 2023-22 WSB Project No. 022968-000 Dear Mr. Leonard: We have reviewed the Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans submittal dated September 19, 2023. The applicant proposes to construct a new 50 -unit four story apartment project including a 70 -stall detached garage complex with a mix of cold and heated spaces. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Monticello's general engineering and stormwater treatment standards. We offer the following comments regarding these matters. City staff will provide additional comments under separate cover. Preliminary/Final Plat & General Comments 1. City staff and Fire Marshall will provide comments under separate cover. In -progress, awaiting confirmation from Fire Marshall 2. With final plat submittal, provide a sheet with hatching for differing pavement types (streets, concrete walk, bituminous trails, etc.). Complete. 3. The building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements. In -progress, awaiting confirmation from Fire Marshall. 4. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments on the plans have been summarized in this review letter. Existing Conditions & Demolition Plans (Sheet C1 & C4) 5. The existing site and demolition plans will also need to include existing utility locations, pipe sizes, pipe material types, structure rim/invert elevations, etc Complete. 6. Add more items to the legend including the linetypes for the various elements on the plans such as property lines, easement lines, setback lines, property corners, utility linetypes, etc. Complete. 7. Show a 2' strip of bituminous replacement adjacent to curb removals/replacement. Complete. 8. Show more contour labels for the areas south of the lot. Complete. K:A022968-000AAdminADocs\2023-09-20 Submittal (Final Plat)A 2023-09-29 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 2 Site Plan (Sheets C3) 9. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures and required turnaround space as required by the Fire Marshall. Fire truck circulation will also need to accommodate the City's ladder truck. Complete. 10. Provide a pedestrian path along Elm Street and 7th Street adjacent to the development site. Also a pedestrian path is to be installed along the south side of 7th Street to or at a minimum, a connection to the adjacent existing sidewalks should be provided. Update the 10' wide trail along 71" Street to a 6' wide sidewalk with a 6' boulevard. 11. Show any proposed signage and lighting units on site plan. Add stop signs at the exit points of the site. Complete. 12. Turn off existing contouring on site plan for clarity. Complete. 13. Confirm whether or not there will be a monument sign and show location on plan. Complete. 14. Provide additional dimensioning examples of parking spaces. It appears there are at least two size variations proposed. Complete. 15. Provide more specific hatching in the legend for the various pavement types (i.e. 4" versus 6" concrete, standard versus heavy duty bituminous pavement, etc.) Complete. 16. There are parking spaces at the NE entrance and pavement areas on the south side of the site that are encroaching into the drainage and utility easements. The City is amenable to this but will require that the applicant confirm no existing utilities are impacted with the encroachment. Grading & Drainage Plan (Sheets C5 & C6) 17. Label more of the proposed contours and the location of all EOF's. Locations of EOF's or other concentrated discharge point over vegetated areas will require a permanent energy dissipation/stabilization method such as rip -rap or permanent turf reinforcement matting. Complete. 18. Within handicapped accessible spaces or routes within the parking areas, the grade cannot exceed 2.0%. Provide more grading detail, spot elevations, or note(s) to reinforce this requirement Complete. 19. With final construction plans, provide more spot elevations along curb lines, requisite with what would be required for a surveyor to provide construction staking Complete. 20. Include additional drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runotr witnin vegetated areas. Complete. 21. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures. Complete. 22. Retaining walls greater than 4' in height will need to be designed by a professional engineer and require a railing or safety fence at the top. 23. Reconfigure pet area near the central infiltration basin so that it does not drain directly into the basin. K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-20 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 3 Utility Plan (Sheets C7) 24. Show more clearly (with thicker lines) where the water/sewer service extensions are 1----' -- +he plan; currently, they are difficult to distinguish from the existing linework. Complete. 25. It is not clear what the existing valve configuration and hydrant location is with the existing water service, review and correct the plans. The existing hydrant on the north side of the site will be located within the proposed bituminous trail (or revised plan with concrete walk); this will need to be relocated outside of the trail or walk and have at least a 2' clearance to the edge of the pavement. 26. Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will be required to apply for a permit from DLI, provide copies to the City. In -progress, awaiting receipt of final permit documents. 27. Hydrant locations shall be reviewed and approved of by the City Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250' overlapping influence radius (maximum 400' spacing) is required along roadway (hose length). Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. Complete. 28. The watermain connections to the building shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV on the plan (if required). In -progress, the PIV is shown but is in the potential fall zone of the building. Location to be verified by the City Fire Marshall. 29. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet. Complete. 30. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect o Complete. a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5'. e. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details. f. The City will require televising for sanitary and storm sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the City for review. 31. The City's preference is for the watermain connection on Elm Street to be a wet -tap. If a wet -tap is not used, the contractor must coordinate with the City utility department and property owners impacted. Stormwater Management & Modelling (Sheet C8) 32. Provide the hydroCAD calculations with the final submittal to verify drainage areas, impervious and treatment capacity. Complete. K:A022968-000AAdminADocs\2023-09-20 Submittal (Final Plat)A 2023-09-29 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 4 33. This site was designed to drain to the regional stormwater pond on the north side of 7th St. The pond will provide rate control for the site based on a curve number of 89. Complete, the site is shown to have a curve of 89 meeting requirements. 34. Sheet 5C references web soil survey for soils information, please Include soil borings to verify soil types and infiltration rates for the site along with separation from the ground water. Soils borings should be a minimum of 5' below the bottom of the proposed infiltration basins. In -progress, awaiting receipt of geotechnical report. 35. The new site will need to provide onsite volume control for runoff of 1.1" over the new impervious area, Pre-treatment measures are required prior to discharging to the volume control BMPs. a. Verification of soil infiltration rates is required. Complete, noted on plan to be completed after grading. b. When designing an infiltration practice for volume control and water quality management, on-site testing and detailed analysis are strongly encouraged in order to determine the infiltration rates of the proposed infiltration facility. Documented site-specific infiltration or hydraulic conductivity measurements (double -ring infiltrometer) completed by a licensed soil scientist or engineer is required. Complete, acknowledged by applicant. 36. An operation and maintenance plan for all stormwater BMPs is required and should be submitted with the stormwater report for review. Complete. 37. The site is outside of the DWSMA and is not subject to requirements of the City's Wellhead Protection Plan. Complete. 38. Pretreatment, in the form of ponds, forebays, filter strips, or other approved methods, shall be provided for all infiltration areas. Currently rain guardian turrets are shown. Additional pretreatment will be required for the central infiltration basin to prevent maintenance issues in the future. CBMH 2 and 7 should be 4 foot sumps per City standards. Complete. 39. Provide a stabilized EOF route for the central infiltration basin Complete. c. Emergency Overflows (EOFs) shall be sized with a minimum bottom width of five feet and 4:1 side slopes. Label all EOF locations on the plans. d. The maximum flow depth in EOFs shall be less than equal to one foot as calculated for a 100 -year back-to-back storm event. e. At least two feet of vertical separation is required from an area's emergency overflow elevation to the lowest opening of a building. Current plans show garage FFE of 960 and an EOF elevation of 958. 40. For basins with a suitable outlet, freeboard will be two -feet above the HWL determined by modeling the 100 -year critical event. Verify HWL have a minimum of 2' from all structure: Complete. Erosion Control & SWPPP Plans (Sheets C9 & C10) 41. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future full plan set submittals. In progress, a more detailed review of erosion/sediment control and SWPPP will be conducted with future submittals. K:A022968-000AAdminADocs\2023-09-20 Submittal (Final Plat)A 2023-09-29 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 5 42. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review (if required due to disturbance limits), prior to construction commencing. 43. Label redundant perimeter control around the stormwater treatment areas. Silt fence should be double layered to a 3 foot minimum separation and 5 foot maximum separation. Show a row of silt fence or bio -roll at the bottom of the slope around the perimeter of the infiltration areas. Complete. 44. Change line type or color on erosion control plan show erosion control BMP's clearly show up. Currently they blend into the contour lines. Complete. 45. Erosion control blanket is required for slopes 4:1 or great( Complete. Construction Notes & Standard Details Plans (Sheets C11 -C16) 46. The pavement design/typical section shall be designed to meet the City's standard, at minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site and may need to include a thicker aggregate section and/or a sand section here the fire truck access route is intended. Provide details for the various pavement sections. In -progress, awaiting receipt of geotechnical report. Pavement section to be designed and submitted accordingly. 47. Provide details for the proposed stormwater treatment areas. A 4" layer of basic "topsoil" is not typically recommended with infiltration basins, reference the MN Stormwater Manual for preferred soil types and specificatio Complete. 48. Provide specific details for each of the control structures propose Complete. 49. Some details appear to be very light in color and may be difficult to read on printed hard copy, please review. Complete. 50. Use City details in all cases where practicable. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal. Complete. Traffic & Access 51. Five spaces must be dedicated as Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant in the indoor heated lot to meets the required amount for lots with a total of 101-150 parking spaces. Four spaces must be dedicated as ADA compliant in the outdoor lot to meet the required amount with a total of 76-100 parking spaces. Accessible parking spaces and aisles must meet all ADA requirements. Complete. 52. The site would generate approximately 227 daily trips, 19 AM peak hour trips and 20 PM peak hour trips. The e), �g Average Daily Traffic on 7th Street is 5300 and on EIr Street is 1550. Complete, the addition of the proposed traffic should not have an impact on roadway capacity or operations. 53. Provide a pedestrian pain along tim Street and 7th Street adjacent to the development site. Also, to provide connectivity, a pedestrian path is to be installed along the south side of 7th Street to or nt n minimum, a connection to the adjacent existing sidewalks should be provided Complete. K:\022968-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-20 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City of Monticello — Briggs Apartment Site Preliminary Plat and Plans — Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 6 54. Provide a sight line exhibit at 71'' Street access and show that intersection/driveway sight distances will be met. Add distance triangles for left-urning and right -turning vehicles at the access. Wetlands & Buffers 55. A wetland delineation should be completed and submitted to the Local Government Unit (the City of Monticello) for review and approval. There is a mapped National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetland at the east side of the parcel. Complete. Notice of Decision from 2016 (LGU No. 2596-150) approves no wetlands on site. 56. If wetland impacts are proposed, a replacement plan must be submitted to the City of Monticello for Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) review Complete, no wetlands onsite. 57. The City has wetland buffer and setback rules that are based on the functional quality of the wetlands. If wetlands are identified on site, wetland buffers and setbacks will be required. Complete, no wetlands onsite. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 612-419-1549 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB Jim Stremel, P.E. Senior Project Manager K:A022968-000AAdminADocs\2023-09-20 Submittal (Final Plat)A 2023-09-29 Briggs Apt Prelim -Final Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx c OF �` Montiello September 27, 2023 PHONE: 763-295-2711 FAx:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street ' Suite 1 i Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Briggs Companies Request for Development Stage PUD and Rezoning to PUD Planning File: 2023-22 The Building/Fire Department has the following general comments or this project: • If the parking garage is not required to have a fire suppression system installed, we may need to install another fire hydrant on the east side of the garage units. Dur Fire Chief and our Fire Inspector will need to complete a thorough review of the site plan. • Fire Chief will verify if the correct turning radius is used, I believe it is. • Please verify the fire suppression system in the residential units to be a NFPA 13 or NFPA 13R. Sincerely, 40 AJ411� Ron Hackemueller Building Official vvW W.cL montice i 1 o.m n.us From: Cruikshank. Thomas (DOT) To: Hayden Stensoard Cc: Angela Schumann; Peterson, Keith (DOT) Subject: RE: City of Monticello, MN I Application for Preliminary Plat Date: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 10:23:37 AM Attachments: image001.Dna image002.pnna Hi Hayden, We would have no substantive concerns with this plat. Only couple of things to pass along are that no stormwater can flow into the ROW — we would like to review any site/development plans when they are presented to the City. Also, if these are developed for residential property we like to see some kind of berming or fencing to mitigate noise from 194. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Tom Cruikshank Principal Planner I District 3 3725 12th Street North, St. Cloud, MN 56303-2107 Phone: (320) 223-6526 1 Cell: (320) 267-9859 Email: thomas.cruikshank(@state.mn.us ffEDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION From: Hayden Stensgard <Hayden.Stensgard@ci.monticello.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 12:47 PM To: Cruikshank, Thomas (DOT) <Thomas.Cruikshank@state.mn.us> Cc: Angela Schumann <Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us> Subject: City of Monticello, MN I Application for Preliminary Plat This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. Good afternoon Tom, The City of Monticello received an application for preliminary plat adjacent to State right -of way. Please find the attached for formal review and comment. Thank you, Hayden Stensgard Community & Economic Development Coordinator City of Monticello, MN Direct: 763-271-3206 CITY OF Monti�eflo Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government offices is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and may be disclosed to third parties. Planning Commission Agenda: 10/03/23 3B. Consideration of adopting Resolution PC -2023-34, a Resolution Finding that the Proposed Acquisition of Certain Land, Lot 1, Block 34, Original Plat of Monticello, PID 155010034010, by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority is Consistent with the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Community Development Director 10/03/2023 Commission action): NA Additional Analysis by: City Administrator, Economic Development Manager, Community & Economic Development Coordinator ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt Resolution PC -2023-34 finding that the proposed acquisition of certain land, Lot 1, Block 34, Original Plat of Monticello, PID 155010034010, by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority is consistent with the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan (Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan). 2. Motion of other. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Planning Commission is asked to consider a recommendation finding that the acquisition of parcel 155010034010 by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) is in conformance to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The acquisition of the parcel is intended to facilitate future revitalization and redevelopment efforts on Block 34 in accordance with the City's adopted Downtown Small Area Plan. The subject parcel is approximately .25 acres and is located at the corner of Pine and 3rd Street East on the southwest corner of Block 34 of the Original Plat of Monticello. The parcel is currently occupied by an existing commercial building that has been converted to a retail use as a retail/consignment store. There is also an existing detached accessory building located at the rear of the property. Acquisition of this parcel will expand the opportunity for redevelopment on Block 34 consistent with the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan and the Downtown Small Area Plan. The parcel is guided "Downtown Mixed Use" within the current Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The Comprehensive Plan adopts the Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan as the guiding document for downtown development and land use. The Downtown Small Area Plan Planning Commission Agenda: 10/03/23 establishes a vision for "solidifying Downtown as the heart of the community with a series of coordinated public and private investments." The investments are intended to "create a human -scaled environment that encourages gathering, socializing, visiting and enjoying on a daily basis - throughout the year." Acquisition of the parcel by the EDA is a strategic opportunity given the significant existing public ownership of parcels within the block (shown on Exhibit C). There are also two active municipal wells on Block 34. The presence of the wells limits development within their immediate vicinity due to water supply regulations, making the acquisition of this parcel key to achieving development density on the block. In summary, the subject property makes quarter block development and beyond a more realistic possibility given the current ownership and existing use configurations on the block. The following statements within the vision for Downtown are relevant to this acquisition: "To promote Broadway Street as a storefront district with restaurants and specialty retail" and to "improve the experience of Pine Street for all users". This parcel's location on Block 34 corner will support the EDA's efforts to continue the revitalization of Downtown along Broadway and Pine Street consistent with the Downtown vision. The Downtown Small Area Plan further cites the redevelopment of Block 34 as a specific redevelopment opportunity for the City, providing proposed development concepts and frontage configurations. At this time, there is no immediate plan to redevelop the site. Similar to Block 52 located to the northwest of this site, it is likely that the EDA will work with the development community to accomplish a development in accordance with the Downtown Plan. The EDA has entered into a purchase agreement on the property, which is contingent on the Planning Commission's finding. The Commission's role is to provide a report to the City and EDA on the conformance of the acquisition to the adopted Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City staff supports Alternative #1 above. Acquisition of this property by the City is consistent with the Monticello 2040 Plan's goals for encouraging a revitalized downtown, as it is a key property in supporting redevelopment on Block 34. Revitalization of Block 34 is a critical component of strengthening the Broadway and Pine Street corridors of the Downtown. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-34 B. Aerial Site Image C. Public Property Ownership Exhibit, Block 34 D. Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan, Excerpts E. M N Statute 462.356 W CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-34 A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LAND FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") proposes to purchase certain property (the "Property") located at 216 Pine Street in the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto, for the purposes of redevelopment; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.356, subd. 2, requires the City Planning Commission (the "Planning Commission") to review the proposed acquisition or disposal of publicly owned real property within the City prior to its acquisition or disposal, to determine whether in the opinion of the Planning Commission, such acquisition or disposal is consistent with the City's comprehensive municipal plan (the "Comprehensive Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed acquisition of the Property and has determined that the Property is located on Block 34, a key redevelopment site in the Pine Steet subdistrict of the Central Community District, and is designated for mixed use development within the Comprehensive Plan and the City's Downtown Small Area Plan, and that the Authority's purpose is to redevelop the Property consistent with these uses, and that the proposed acquisition is therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, that the acquisition of the Property by the Authority is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will promote the successful redevelopment of Block 34 in the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be communicated to the Board of Commissioners of the Authority. ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2023, by the Monticello Planning Commission. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: Paul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director MN325\49\901589.v1 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-34 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Lot 1, Block 34, Original Plat of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota. PID: 155-010-034010 MN325\49\901589.v1 .e • Q �Aj V00 Background and Purpose The purpose of this Plan is to attract and direct investments on the core blocks of Downtown Monticello, MN over the next 10 years. The Plan advocates for solidifying Downtown as the heart of the community with a series of coordinated public and private investments. Together, these investments will create a human -scaled environment that encourages gathering, socializing, visiting and enjoying on a daily basis - throughout the year. The improvements outlined in this Plan aim to build on the unique qualities of Monticello to make the Downtown yet more attractive to those who have chosen to live and do business in the community. Specifically, the Plan seeks to promote Broadway Street as a storefront district with restaurants and specialty retail, celebrate the River for its recreational, connective and economic qualities, reinvigorate a downtown housing market with multiple, appropriately scaled, infill projects, and improve the experience of Pine Street for all users. The plan is ambitious, but achievable. Over time and upon completion, the plan would usher in up to 500 new units of downtown housing, new restaurants overlooking the river, and unique retail and services on Broadway. Momentum can be established in the next few years. Primary projects to be completed within five years include: redevelopment of Block 52, Walnut Street connection to River Street and infill housing on Walnut Street. Implementation of this Plan will create two legacies. The first will be a revitalized Downtown with an economy and attractions that benefit all residents of Monticello. Equally important, however to the physical improvements described above will be the legacy of new partnerships and civic cooperation that are essential to and will result from coordinated actions. The ideas set forth in this Plan come from the vested interest of the Monticello community through a broad public outreach effort. The realization of these ideas rely on a coordinated, cooperative, and active public sector working in tandem with an entrepreneurial private sector The result will be a lively Downtown for all in Monticello, a place that embodies both its history and future aspirations. Goals � 0 0 weodtlw FFU E] I,. .�� 4 Improve Pine Street for All Users C STI C" Shift the Center of Town to Walnut and Broadway Encourage Small and Medium Scaled Investments "` _X City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 NOTE:7his illustration depicts new deveopment on both private and public properties. The plan does not i Tu compel private property owners to change anything regarding how they use their land. Rather, the Plan is a /i� t. guide for change if the property owner chooses to do so. Please see page—for an illustration of the Master Plan as it applies to publicly held properties only. The City will endeavor to work with' existing business who wish to remain, revitalize and expand in the downtown.- City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Downtown is For Everyone Downtown Monticello is and shall remain the heart of the community. It is the birthplace of the City and the focus of civic activity. This Plan builds off those foundational qualities with a clear vision for the future of the core blocks of Downtown. The vision includes a commitment to retaining Broadway as Monticello's Main Street, supporting existing businesses, improving connections to and relationship with the River, and creating new downtown housing opportunities along Walnut and Cedar Avenues for existing and new Monticello residents. The Plan envisions a Downtown that is lively throughout the day and into the evening, 12 months of the year. A downtown that serves many purposes for many people - including dining, recreation, celebrating, gathering, shopping and living. Illustrative Master Plan The Plan above describes a potential long term build out of the core blocks of Downtown Monticello. Character Areas Similar to the Embracing Downtown Plan, the Plan divides the study area into four different character Areas. The purpose of this is to create sub -areas in downtown, each with its own identity and purpose and direction. The character areas are developed based on their context and their future role in the downtown. Typically each character area is a mix of uses, but also has a dominant use. Character Area: Riverfront A redesigned Park with an amphitheater and better relationship to Downtown will help connect the River to Downtown Character Area: Walnut Street and Cedar Street Walnut and Cedar Streets will fill in with new housing (2-4 stories) that adds to the market strength of downtown and provides additional housing choices for new and existing residents of Monticello. Their intersections with Broadway will be improved to make it easier to walk to the Riverfront Character Area: Broadway Monticello's Main Street will transition over time from a street with primarily services, to one with unique retail and restaurants. t Character Area: Pine Street (TH 25) The community will reclaim Pine Street by maintaining it's width and adding pedestrian amenities and local serving commercial uses. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Block 34 Block 34 (public ownership in blue) Br\yStrPPtF lP 2 h� ell Frontage And Ground Floor Uses Active (retail) uses are encouraged at Pine Street and Broadway. Residential frontages are encouraged on Cedar Street. The remainder of the block is flexible. Active Frontage Flexible Frontage (either Active or Residential) Most of the properties on Block 34 are f II publicly owned. In addition, there are two wells on the block that impact development.- _ II If If Redevelopment is further challenged by ' 1=..� 1 I I Ir limitations on property access created by medians on Broadway and Pine Street. The site is attractive for "outbound" retail and the plan recommends such a use to be located in Residential Frontage Active Frontage the base of a multi use building on the corner of Pine and Broadway. BroQa�QyStrPe F "et �i ok B "et StrPe % Setbacks, Pocket Parks & Open Space Buildings should define the perimeter of the block with a front facade zone between 5' and 15' of the front property line. The two wells on site have 5o' setbacks and shou Id be incorporated into courtyards or parking areas. Building Setback Well Setback Bro Parking & Servicing -}t 1 Primary access to mid block parking should occur from Cedar Street and 4th Street. Surface Parking Access Way �a r Options The two illustrations above show potential options for development on Block 34 - both adhering to the guidelines. The top illustration shows a development pattern that assumes the property on Cedar Street remains. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas MINNESOTA STATUTES 2022 462.356 462.356 PROCEDURE TO EFFECT PLAN: GENERALLY. Subdivision 1. Recommendations for plan execution. Upon the recommendation by the planning agency of the comprehensive municipal plan or sections thereof, the planning agency shall study and propose to the governing body reasonable and practicable means for putting the plan or section of the plan into effect. Subject to the limitations of the following sections, such means include, but are not limited to, zoning regulations, regulations for the subdivision of land, an official map, a program for coordination of the normal public improvements and services of the municipality, urban renewal and a capital improvements program. Subd. 2. Compliance with plan. After a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no publicly owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be acquired or disposed of, nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality or special district or agency thereof or any other political subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality until after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital improvement and reported in writing to the governing body or other special district or agency or political subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition, disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan. Failure of the planning agency to report on the proposal within 45 days after such a reference, or such other period as may be designated by the governing body shall be deemed to have satisfied the requirements of this subdivision. The governing body may, by resolution adopted by two-thirds vote dispense with the requirements of this subdivision when in its judgment it finds that the proposed acquisition or disposal of real property or capital improvement has no relationship to the comprehensive municipal plan. History: 1965 c 670 s 6 Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes Planning Commission Agenda —10/03/23 4A. Community Development Director's Report Council Action on/related to Commission Recommendations • Consideration of a request for Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Great River Second Addition; Consideration of a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a 138 -unit multi -family residential building in the B-3, Highway Business District. Applicant: Briggs Companies The City Council approved the preliminary and final plat, and companion development contract specific to the plat on September 25, 2023. The Council removed the item from the consent agenda to clarify that the applicant understands that the plat creates a buildable lot only and that action on the PUD is pending. The applicant confirmed. Xcel Community Breakfast Xcel Energy hosted a community breakfast on September 27th, 2023. The annual event is an opportunity for Wright and Sherburne county -area leaders to learn more about Xcel Energy's activities over the prior year and upcoming goals and projects. Xcel provided an update on their work toward zero -carbon emission energy, as well as site-specific improvements at both the Sherco and Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant sites (MNGP). In relationship to MNGP, Xcel indicated that their request for additional spent fuel storge on the MNGP site had been approved, that state re -licensure through 2040 was approved, and that they are seeking re -licensure through 2050 at the federal level. IEDC — Monticello School District STEM Presentation During the September 26, 2023 IEDC meeting, representatives from the Monticello School District presented on their STEM curriculum. The program, which reaches middle school students, provides an introduction to and critical pathway for future interest and careers in science, technology and math. Staff encourage the Planning Commission to view the presentation slides: MMS STEM - Industry and Economic Development Committee (monticello.mn.us) Housing Study Update Staff anticipate the draft Housing Study Update to be ready in mid-October. An updated presentation, including additional clarification on housing -type demand is intended for the regular EDA meeting on October 11th, 2023. November Commission Meeting Reminder A reminder that due to the fact that November 7th lands on an Election Day, the Commission's regular November meeting will move to Monday, November 6th, 2023. Planning Commission Agenda —10/03/23 Project Update List October's updated project listing is attached. Deephaven Apartments Residential 1255 Edmonson Ave NE 3 apartment buildings totalling 165 units 1/30/2020 Completed Take 5 Car Wash Commercial 4008 Deegan Court New construction car wash (4,146 sq ft) 9/27/2021 Completed Monticello Lakes Apartments Residential Southeast area of The Pointes at Cedar 2100 unit multi -family apartments 12/13/2021 Under Construction Runnings Expansion Commercial 3007th St W Expansion of current facility (13,962 sq ft) 12/13/2021 Completed Twin Pines Apartments Residential South Side of School Blvd. East of Wal-Mart 96 multi -family unit apartment building 2/28/2022 Yet to Break Ground Block 52 Redevelopment Mixed -Use NE Corner of Highway 25 and Broadway St 87 multi -family units with rougly 30,000 sq ft of 1st floor commercial 9/30/2022 Under Construction Featherstone 6th Addition Residential North of 85th St NE and West of Highway 25 21 Single-family lots with commercially guided outlots for future development 8/24/2022 Under Construction (Last New Const. Permit Pulled) Tesla Stations at Cub Foods Commercial 206 7th St W Installation of 8 charging ports in the Cub Foods parking lot 7/12/2022 Completed Taco Bell Remodel Commercial 124 7th St E Remodel of existing building and expansion of 724 sq ft 9/30/2022 Completed Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Residential South of Farmstead Ave and West of Fallon Ave NE 59 Single -Family Lot Development Reapproved 8/28/2023 Grading Commenced Headwaters West Development Residential Along South side of 7th St W between Elm St and Golf Course Rd 102 apartment unit & 60 townhome Senior 55+ Development 9/26/2022 Townhomes Under Construction Sunny Days Therapy Commercial Along South side of 7th St E West of Old McDonald's Location Development of an Occupational Child Therapy Facility 8/22/2022 Under Construction Camping World Commercial 3801 Chelsea Rd W Installation of an attached paint booth (1,100 sq ft) 8/22/2022 Under Construction Electro Industries Expansion Industrial 2150 River St Expansion of current facility (4,300 sq ft) 9/26/2022 Yet to Break Ground Wiha Tools USA Industrial Along South Side of 7th St E across from Wright St and Ramsey St New construction light manufacturing (72,540 sq ft) 11/28/2022 Under Construction Kwik Trip#345 Commercial 9440 State Highway 25 Expansion of current facility (520 sq ft) 1/23/2023 Completed Scooter's Coffee Commercial 1007th St W. New Construction of Drive Through Coffee Shop 1/23/2023 Completed Cargill Kitchens Solutions Industrial 206 W. 4th St. Replacement of Outdoor Storage Tanks 4/24/2023 Completed Deephaven 3 (Lot 2) Commercial Southeast corner of Cedar St and Chelsea Rd New Construction of a Clinic/Medical Service Facility (10,000 sq ft) N/A Under Construction Culver's 2nd Drive -Through Aisle Commercial 9395 State Highway 25 Addition of a 2nd Drive -Through Aisle along the South Property Line 7/24/2023 Yet to Break Ground