The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Agenda - 01/02/2024AGENDA REGULAR MEETING – PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 2, 2024 – 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL JOINT WORKSHOP Monticello Community Center – North Mississippi 5:00 p.m. Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Submittal for potential Phased Development of an Industrial Services principal use in the 1-2, Heavy Industrial District Commissioners: Chair Paul Konsor, Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck, Rob Stark Council Liaison: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items D. Approval of Agenda E. Oath of Office Administration—Rob Stark F. Consideration to appoint 2024 Planning Commission Officers G. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes—December 5, 2023 (4:15 p.m.) • Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes—December 5, 2023 • Regular Meeting Minutes—December 5, 2023 • Special Meeting Minutes—December 5, 2023 (7:30 p.m.) H. Citizen Comment 2. Public Hearings A. Consideration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Drive -Through Services as an Accessory Use in the B-3, Highway Business District Applicant: Todd Olin B. Consideration of a Request for an Amendment to the Country Club Manor 2nd Addition PUD District, as related to principal residential use for development of 22 units of twinhomes; Request for Preliminary Plat of Country Club Manor 41h Addition. Applicant: Michael Hoagberg C. Consideration of Adoption of the 2024 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map Applicant: City of Monticello 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration to adopt the 2024-2025 Planning Commission Workplan Update 4. Other Business A. Community Development Director's Report 5. Adjournment MINUTES JOINT MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Tuesday, December 5, 2023 — 5:00 p.m. Monticello Community Center Planning Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck, Planning Commissioners Absent: City Councilmembers Present: City Councilmembers Absent: Staff Present: 1. Call to Order Eric Hagen Chair Paul Konsor Mayor Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz Lee Martie, Sam Murdoff Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Rachel Leonard, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard Planning Commission Vice Chair Andrew Tapper called the joint workshop meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. 2. Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Submittal for the proposed expansion of a commercial self -storage facility and/or guidance for continuation of interim use mit in the Pointes at Cedar Planned Development District Address: 36 Dundas Road, Monticello, MN 55362 1 PIDs: 155-213-002010,155-500- 142305, 155-500-142304 1 Applicant: Bruce Stainbrook Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview of the purpose of the joint workshop meeting. The purpose was for a concept Planned Unit Development review aimed at providing helpful and constructive feedback to the development team that presented the concept. This concept stage review in particular is a little different, as the subject property was originally developed by way of Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, and the developer is looking for guidance on the best way to expand the facility, that is adjacent to the Pointes at Cedar Planned Development District. Notices were sent out for this meeting to the surrounding area, where the development is proposed. Ms. Schumann noted that the meeting did not involve a public hearing, but if time allows, residents present may address the group. City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission, City Council, and the public. The current Storagel-ink facility along Dundas Road received approval for a 10 -year Interim Use Permit (IUP) for the utilization of storage boxes on site in 2014. Prior to that IUP expiring in 2024, the developer requested a joint workshop meeting to better understand how the site would move forward with either an expansion, or an extension of the IUP for the storage boxes. The applicant provided a concept design for a first option, showing 2 additional proposed permanent buildings on site, that would replace the existing storage boxes. The proposed buildings depict a zero -lot line setback at both the North and South property lines. The second option for consideration was an extension of the existing IUP for the storage boxes for another 3-5 years, with no construction of buildings within that timeframe. Mayor Lloyd Hilgart asked if the eventual vacation of Dundas Road has any bearing on how the site is currently proposed to expand with the first option. Mr. Grittman clarified that the vacation of Dundas Road would not hinder option 1, as the proposed building to the North depicts a zero -foot setback from the property line, the building in its entirety is still within the property boundaries. Mayor Hilgart further expressed his disinterest in continuing to allow storage boxes on site following the expiration of the originally approved IUP. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler asked the applicant what his preference was for the future of the site. Byron Bjorklund, applicant, stated he would be okay with either of the options presented at the meeting. However, given the plans for the surrounding area that is The Pointes at Cedar, he would be interested in first replacing the storage boxes along the South property line with a permanent building, and build the propose North building as part of a future phase. Mr. Tapper asked what kind of wall would be on the proposed south building that would replace the existing storage boxes. Mr. Bjorklund clarified that it would be identical to the EIFS walls seen at the StorageLink Chelsea Road location in Monticello. Eric Hagen said that he agreed with the mayor's comments regarding not extending the active IUP on site for the storage boxes. Mr. Tapper asked if there would be any plan to secure the site with fencing or walls around the facility. Mr. Bjorklund noted that eventually, it would be their intention to secure at least the East side of the property with fencing. Mr. Bjorklund also noted that there is potential along that East side for a berm for added screening as well. Ms. Schumann clarified the next steps for the applicants would be to prepare a formal land use application submittal for amending their existing Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development related to their plans for expansion. No action was taken on the item. 3. Adjournment By consensus, the joint workshop meeting was adjourned at 5:27 p.m. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING – PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, December 5, 2023 – 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center SPECIAL MEETING of the MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Monticello Community Center – Academy Room 4:15 p.m. Interview of Candidate for Open Planning Commission Position 7:30 p.m. Interview of Candidate for Open Planning Commission Position MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL JOINT WORKSHOP Monticello Community Center – North Mississippi 5:00 p.m. Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Submittal for expansion of Storage Link -Dundas facility (36 Dundas Road) Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Eric Hagen, Melissa Robeck Commissioners Absent: Chair Paul Konsor Council Liaison Present: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard 1. General Business A. Call to Order Vice Chair Andrew Tapper called the regular meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Roll Call Mr. Tapper called the roll. C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items None D. Approval of Agenda MELISSA ROBECK MOVED TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 5, 2023 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. E. ADDroval of Meetine Minutes •Regular Meeting Minutes—November 6, 2023 ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 6, 2023 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Citizen Comment None 2. Public Hearings A. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.091— Use Specific Standards, to allow for a single industrial self -storage facility to be built on a parcel less than two acres, and allow for such individual units to be divided into spaces of at least 1,500 square feet in industrial districts, and including definitions or other regulations necessary to define and limit the intent or application of the proposed amendment. Applicant: Skylar Rekstad City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. The applicant's request is to amend the lot size requirements for Industrial Self -Storage facilities to allow for single -building construction on a site. The current zoning ordinance requires a 2 -acre parcel minimum for development of an Industrial Self -Service Use. The applicant owns a property within the City's 1-1, Light Industrial district that could potentially be developed in accordance with the proposed amendments, once subdivided. City staff recommended approval of the ordinance amendment. Mr. Tapper asked if the Industrial Self -Service principal use is conditional in all allowed zoning districts. Mr. Grittman clarified that the use is conditional in the 1-1 and 1-2 districts, and is not allowed in any other district. Eric Hagen asked if the difference in square feet of unit size minimum is sufficient between single -building parcels and multi -building parcels. The proposed language would establish a minimum of 2,000 square foot units for multi -building facilities and 1,500 square foot units for single -building facilities. Mr. Grittman believed the difference is sufficient for the given circumstances. Mr. Tapper opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Tapper closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Tapper asked for clarification on the proposed added language to Subsection E, Operation, of the overall proposed amendment. Mr. Grittman said that staff believed it was appropriate to note that the units within an industrial self -storage facility are for personal use only, and not for commercial or industrial business purposes. Mr. Tapper thought this was the original intention of the applicant's proposed amendment, to be able to rent out or sell individual units of a facility for people to house their businesses. Mr. Grittman clarified that an individual could produce commercial or industrial products at a facility as such, but the extent of the business practice would be required to be limited in terms of public exposure. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler mentioned that the extent of the potential uses and site impact would relate more to the City's code enforcement policy, rather than the zoning ordinance language itself. Mr. Tapper asked how the underlying use of Industrial Self -Storage would address site impacts that the uses within the specific units could produce. Mr. Grittman noted that those concerns and considerations would need to be addressed at the time of the Conditional Use Permit review. Any other changes or additional impacts that follow that review would need to be addressed by way of the City's change in use/occupancy review. ERIC HAGEN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-37 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE XV: LAND USAGE, CHAPTER 153: ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 153.091— USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS AS RELATED TO STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL SELF -STORAGE BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. B. Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide two parcels from Mixed -Density Residential and Mixed Neighborhood to Public and Institutional, Rezoning from A -O, Agriculture Open Space District to Planned Unit Development (PUD) District, Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD for a proposed municipal Public Works facility. Applicant: City of Monticello Mr. Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. The requests for the Planning Commission to consider was in regard to future development of a new public works facility for the City of Monticello. The preliminary plat of Redford Crossing includes one lot for the proposed facility, as well as a lot to the west that would accommodate future private development. Staff's recommendation was approval of the various requests, subject to those conditions established in exhibit Z of the staff report. Mr. Tapper noted that along the south and east borders of the proposed public works site shows a pathway, and asked if it was an active path as part of the entire pathway system. Mr. Grittman noted that it is an informal path that is anticipated to be removed to accommodate the noted berming as part of the site landscaping plan. Melissa Robeck noted there are outbuildings along the south border of the proposed site, and asked if they are anticipated to remain. Mr. Grittman clarified that those storage sheds are anticipated to remain, but those found to be encroaching on the City's property will need to be moved back on to their respective property. Ms. Robeck as if the proposed berm on site would screen the south property from site noise. Mr. Grittman said that while the noise impacts will not entirely be avoidable, the berm would assist with some screening for noise as well as lighting. Mr. Tapper opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Public Comment Ben Anderson, 4208 Eaton Circle NE, Monticello, MN 55362, asked what the purpose of the berm is given the existing vegetation that is along the southern property line. Mr. Grittman clarified that though there is vegetation along the south property line, the existing trees were not large enough to be factored into the required inventory for removal. It is anticipated that the berm and new plantings will provide ample screening, compared to the existing conditions. Mr. Anderson requested that consideration be taken to account for the disruption of that vegetation to replace it with a berm and plantings and the short- and long-term benefits for both the City and the adjacent residents Rachel Leonard, City Administrator, noted that for the purposes of this meeting, notice was provided to the adjacent property owners for the public hearing. In the near future, the City plans to host engagement opportunities, such as open houses with residents, both owners and renters in the area for an opportunity to provide their feedback. Matt Leonard, Public Works Director/City Engineer, mentioned that in regard to noise, the Public Works Department will proactively load necessary vehicles and materials the day prior, to eliminate any concerns of noise early in the morning. Mr. Tapper asked if the proposed fencing along the south and east of the site is for security purposes. Mr. Leonard said that was correct, and that the proposed fence along School Boulevard will reflect those seen on commercial property along the north side of Chelsea Road West. Mr. Tapper closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Hagen noted that he agreed with Mr. Anderson's comments during the public hearing, and that Staff and the design team should verify that the proposed berming and planting plan along the south property line is the best path to move forward. Mr. Tapper encouraged staff and the design team as well to eliminate unnecessary impervious surface for the proposed development of the site, if possible. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-38 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF REDFORD CROSSING SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT Z AND BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-39 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO REGUIDE THE PROPOSED LOT 2, BLOCK AND OUTLOTS A, B AND C OF REDFORD CROSSING TO PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL AND LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF REDFORD CROSSING TO MIXED NEIGHBORHOOD, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT Z AND BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. TERI LEHNER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-40 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MAP AMENDMENT REZONING THE PROPOSED LOT 2, BLOCK 1 AND OUTLOTS A, B AND C OF THE REDFORD CROSSING TO PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. TERI LEHNER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-41 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD FOR THE PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY ON THE PROPOSED LOT 2, BLOCK 1 AND OUTLOTS A, B AND C OF REDFORD CROSSING SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT Z AND BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of a recommendation for Planning Commission appointment for exoirine term for Teri Lehner Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. Commissioner Lehner's current term on the Planning Commission is set to expire on December 31, 2023. Ms. Lehner had indicated to staff prior to the meeting that she is willing to serve another term. ra►u:��.��ra»:a► �•>,� � • r•>,:�•>;•�► iuu��•>;•�► iu��•�►��:��:u�:ar•�:mei THREE-YEAR TERM TO THE PLANNING COMMISISON, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2024. ERIC HAGEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. B. Consideration of 2023-2025 Planning Commission Workplan Update Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. Staff requested the Planning Commission review their workplan and provided a worksheet for the review. The Planning Commission was asked to return their worksheets to staff for them to prepare an update to be presented at their January regular meeting. No action was taken on the agenda item. 4. Other Business A. Community Development Director's Report Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. Eric Hagen was recognized and thanked for his time on the Monticello Planning Commission, as his current term will end on December 31, 2023. No action was taken on the agenda item. 5. Adjournment MELISSA ROBECK MOVED TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:29 P.M. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, December 5, 2023 - 4:15 p.m. Academy Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Eric Hagen and Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck Commissioners Absent: Chair Paul Konsor Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Hayden Stensgard 1. Call to Order Vice Chair called the special meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 4:15 p.m. 2. Interview of Planning Commissioner Candidates and Recommendation of Candidate. The Planning Commission interviewed a candidate for the vacant Planning Commissioner position. The position was previously held by Eric Hagen, who at the November regular meeting submitted his resignation from the commission following the remainder of his term in 2023. Any recommendation of a candidate would be forwarded to the City Council on December 11, 2023. When the vacant position is filled, the newly appointed commissioner will begin a new term in January of 2024, expiring at the end of the year 2026. No action was taken on the item. 3. Added Items None 4. Adjournment By consensus the special meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission was adjourned at 4:50 p.m. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, December 5, 2023 - 7:30 p.m. Academy Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Eric Hagen and Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck Commissioners Absent: Chair Paul Konsor Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Hayden Stensgard 1. Call to Order Vice Chair called the special meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 7:38 p.m. 2. Interview of Planning Commissioner Candidates and Recommendation of Candidate. The Planning Commission interviewed a candidate for the vacant Planning Commissioner position. The position was previously held by Eric Hagen, who at the November regular meeting submitted his resignation from the commission following the remainder of his term in 2023. Any recommendation of a candidate would be forwarded to the City Council on December 11, 2023. When the vacant position is filled, the newly appointed commissioner will begin a new term in January of 2024, expiring at the end of the year 2026. MELISSA ROBECK MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPOINT ROB STARK TO THE VACANT POSITION ON THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. 3. Added Items None 4. Adjournment By consensus the special meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission was adjourned at 8:24 p.m. Planning Commission Agenda - 01/02/2024 2A. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Drive - Through Services as an Accessory Use in the B-3, Highway Business District. Applicant: Todd Olin Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Stephen Grittman, City Planner 01/02/2024 Commission action): 01/22/2024 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Chief Building and Zoning Official, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Project Engineer ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to construct an accessory drive-through facility to a proposed quick -service restaurant. 1. Motion to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for an accessory drive- through facility based on findings in Resolution PC -2024-01 and subject to the Conditions of Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit for an accessory drive- through facility based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table, subject to additional information from staff or applicant. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Silver Fox PID #: 155-079-001010 Planning Case Number: 2024-02 Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for an accessory drive-through service. Deadline for Decision: February 16, 2024 (60 -day deadline) April 16, 2024 (120 -day deadline) Land Use Designation: Regional Commercial Zoning Designation: B-3, Highway Business 1 Planning Commission Agenda - 01/02/2024 Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign District Current Site Uses: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Industrial -Commercial East: Mixed Commercial South: Mixed Commercial West: Mixed Commercial Project Description: The applicant proposes to construct a quick -service restaurant with indoor ordering and sit-down service, as well as a drive- through lane with an order board for off-site consumption. ANALYSIS Zoning. The subject site is zoned B-3, Highway Business. Within B-3 districts, drive-through facilities are allowed by conditional use permit. The proposed development would include a quick service restaurant with 2 separate brands, and a single drive-through facility serving both brands. Setbacks. The B-3 District imposes building setbacks of 30 feet front, 10 side, 20 feet rear and side/corner within the district. All setbacks are met on the proposed plan, with only the front setback along Cedar Street at the minimum 30 feet. Further, the external 6 -foot setbacks from parking and circulation are met along all property lines. The applicant and City Engineer should verify if any of the improvements will require encroachment agreements into existing or proposed drainage and utility easements. Drive -Through Design. The property will gain access from Cedar Street on the west, with circulation through a parking field along the south property line. Access to the drive-through lanes continues through the parking areas to the north boundary of the site, and proceeds in the counter -clockwise direction to a two-lane order design north of the proposed building. Menu boards and order boards serve each of the two lanes. The lanes recombine for the pickup window on the west side of the building, before exiting the site. A bypass lane extends along the west pickup lane, once both order lanes are combined. There are 12 dedicated waiting spaces for the drive-through, and another six or more that could serve the facility without conflict in the parking areas. Moreover, none of the stacking lane areas would raise conflicts with the public right of way. Other Elements. Two other aspects of the site use are impacted by the revisions to the drive- through, each discussed separately below. 2 Planning Commission Agenda - 01/02/2024 Landscaping. The applicant has incorporated a landscaping plan that meets both the type and quantities of the zoning ordinance. No buffering or screening is required on this site. Trash Enclosure. The trash enclosure is proposed to be located from in the southeast corner of the parking area. The plans specify that the enclosure is to be finished in materials that match the principal building, consistent with the requirements of the code. While not a code requirement nor related to the CUP request, staff encourages the applicants to consider location of the trash area near, or adjacent, to the building to minimize difficulties and hazards for employees tasked with managing refuse generated by the business. Lighting. The applicant has provided a lighting plan that shows all light intensity to be well below the maximum perimeter light level of 1.0 footcandles at the property line in commercial areas. Staff notes that the maximum height of pole lighting is 25 feet — this dimension is not specified on the plans. All lighting is to be hooded and directed downward to avoid glare from adjoining roads or property. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Approval of a conditional use permit application requires that the City find conditions can be established to ensure that all the following criteria will always be met: (i) The conditional use will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Staff Comment: There are no expectations of property value impact. (ii) The conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working near the use. Staff Comment: The drive-through will not endanger persons or property in the area. As noted, consideration of relocating the trash enclosure near to the building will minimize safety concerns for employees and help limit the likelihood of loose trash in the surrounding parking areas. (iii) The conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property for permitted uses predominant in the area. Staff Comment: No access or development will be impacted by the proposed accessory use. (iv) The conditional use will not pose an undue burden on public utilities or roads, and adequate sanitary facilities are provided. Planning Commission Agenda - 01/02/2024 Staff Comment: Construction of the drive-through facility is not expected to have an impact on utilities or roads. (v) The conditional use can provide adequate parking and loading spaces, and all storage on the site can be done in conformance with City Code requirements. Staff Comment: There is more than sufficient parking for both in-store and drive- through customers on the plan. The primary concern in this regard is the trash handling issues raised as noted above. (vi) The conditional use will not result in any nuisance including but not limited to odor, noise, or sight pollution. Staff Comment: No other concerns are expected. (vii) The conditional use will not unnecessarily impact natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, and shorelines, and all erosion will be properly controlled. Staff Comment: No impacts to any natural features are expected with this project. (viii) The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined in Chapter 5 for the proposed use. Staff Comment: In review of the remaining provisions of Chapter 5, the project will be compliant with the City's requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the CUP with the Conditions listed in Exhibit Z. The applicant proposes an accessory drive-through facility which will adequately address traffic flow and safety on the site. To avoid any negative impacts of this improvement, staff has recommended alternatives related to the location of the trash enclosure, and clarification of other elements. Other aspects of the review are applied at building permit, not subject to the formal Conditional Use Permit impacts. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2024-01 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Civil Plans, Including: a. Existing Conditions b. Demolition & Removals Plan c. Site Plan d. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan e. Utility Plan 4 Planning Commission Agenda - 01/02/2024 f. Lighting Plan E. Architectural and Landscaping Plan F. Signage Plan G. Stormwater Memo H. Engineering Comment Letter, dated December 13, 2023 Z. Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT Z CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SILVER FOX 1. The applicant executes an encroachment agreement if needed over any existing or proposed utility easement encroachments. 2. The project is constructed per plans provided, with incorporation of the recommendations made by the Planning Commission and the staff report. 3. Consideration is made for shifting the trash enclosure to a location significantly closer to the building, to minimize visibility and facilitate ease of use and maintenance. 4. Compliance with all other requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, including lighting, signage, and other codes. 5. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2024-01 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A RESTAURANT DRIVE- THROUGH IN A B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT PID 155-079-001010 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a drive- through facility as part of a restaurant use; and WHEREAS, the proposed use has been designed to avoid negative impacts on surrounding property or the public right of way; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Highway Business (B-3), which allows such use as an accessory use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the use would be consistent with the long term land use plan for the City and the location, including the designation of the site for "Regional Commercial" uses; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting that the proposed use would properly manage traffic flow, customer service, and facilitate efficient use of the site consistent with the zoning and land use designation; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting that the proposed use will comply with the terms and standards of the zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2nd, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed facility will be in compliance with the standards for drive-through facilities found in the zoning ordinance. 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the use will provide for efficiency and safe use of the site. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2024-01 3. The parcel is intended for commercial uses, which is the proposed use of the property. 4. The operation of the business will not create noise, odors, visual impacts, or other noticeable impacts on the property or the neighborhood beyond those expected for allowed uses in the zoning district. 5. The use will provide convenience to customers and to the public, consistent with the City's economic development objectives for commercial property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for drive-through facilities, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: 1. The applicant executes an encroachment agreement if needed over any existing or proposed utility easement encroachments. 2. The project is constructed per plans provided, with incorporation of the recommendations made by the Planning Commission and the staff report. 3. Consideration is made for shifting the trash enclosure to a location significantly closer to the building, to minimize visibility and facilitate ease of use and maintenance. 4. Compliance with all other requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, including lighting, signage and other codes. 5. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION A ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 Consideration of CUP for Accessory Use in B-3, Highway Business District Legal: Silver Fox, Lot 1, Block 1 Created by: City of Monticello Land & Resource Consulting I \ ■ THE CIVIL SIDE OF ENGINEERING ■ Angela Schumann, Community Development Director City Hall, City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 September 27, 2023 1 JIMMY 9� JOHN'S RE: Project Narrative, New Jimmy John's & Baskin Robbin's at the Intersection of Oakwood Dr. E. and Cedar St., City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota Ms. Schumann, We are writing to provide a Project Narrative for the New Jimmy John's & Baskin Robbin's Restaurant planned on Lot 1, Block 1 SILVER FOX Addition, at the corner of Oakwood Drive and Cedat Street in the City of Monticello, Wright County. We reviewed the applicable sections of the City Zoning Ordinance, held a conceptual plan review with City Staff and prepared an application package to request site plan review. Following is a Project Outline, the Existing Conditions, Zoning Code Review and Summary of the project. Project Outline: The project design team includes; Developer: Contact: Josh Peterson, Member 688 Bryant, LLC. phone: (612) 290-6266 email: Peterson. iosh82 cDgmail.com Landscape Architect: Lampert Architects, P.A. (see above) Architectural Firm: Laurel Tracy, Designer Lampert Architects, P.A. (763) 755-1211 laurel()lampert-arch.com Professional Surveyor: Brandon King, Owner Burt Surveying, LLC. bklsllc .gmail.com Civil Engineering Firm: Todd Olin, President Land & Resource Consulting (616) 520-5357 toddo(aNandandresource.com The proposed use is a new approach to existing brands. This format is the 1St of its kind in the world. This facility is planned to offer a Jimmy John's and Baskin Robbin's Restaurant not only within the same building, but also within the same space. With the exception of the point-of-sale registers, the dining area, drive-through, kitchen and storage areas are shared. Employees and management are to be sharded by both brands as opposed to a duplicate group of employees for each brand. With the exception of separate point of sale (POS) screens at the order counter, every other aspect is shared. The project site (property) is described as Lot 1, Block 1 of the Silver Fox Addition. The property identification number is 155079001010 no address has been assigned. 14260 23rd Avenue N. • Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 Ph. 763.340.0699 • Email toddo@landandresource.com The property is currently vacant. The property is situated southeast of the intersection of Oakwood Drive E. and Cedar Street. This parcels around this site have been fully developed and existing utilities are available. Zoning Code Review / Comparison: Existing Zoning Designation: B-3 Highway Business The planned use of a restaurant with a drive-through is an allowed use within the existing zoning designation. Minimum Building Setbacks: Required Front Yard: 30' Rear Yard: 20' Side Yard: 10' (20') Parking Setback Information Required Front Yard: 6' Rear Yard: 6' Side Yard: 6' Provided 30' 20' 10' (20) (xx) Denotes corner setback. Provided: 6' 6' 6' Store hours are planned to be 10am to 9 pm, Sunday through Saturday. Access to the site is off Cedar Street and a entrance will be part of the construction. Summary: Jimmy John's and Baskin Robbin's are excited and committed to complete the design and request a building permit after the site plan review process is complete. Please review the application package materials and contact our office if there are any questions or concerns. We look forward to working with you through the course of review and construction. Sincerely, Land & Resource Consulting, Inc. Todd J. Olin, President Project Narrative, New Jimmy John's & Baskin Robbin's Green Haven Parkway, City of Anoka, Anoka County, Minnesota Jimmy Johns 1 Baskin Robbins GENERAL NOTES 1. MN statute requires notifications per "State One Call" prior to commencing any grading, excavations or underground work. 2. The contractor shall field verify locations and elevations of existing utilities and topographic features prior to commencement of construction activity. The contractor shall notify the engineer of any discrepancies or variations from the plans. 3. The contractor shall take all precautions necessary to avoid property damage to to adjacent properties during the construction phase of this project. The contractor will be held responsible for any damages to adjacent properties occurring during the construction phase of this project. 4. The contractor will be responsible for providing and maintaining traffic control devices such as barricades, warning signs, directional signs, flagman and lights to control the movement of traffic where necessary. Placement of these devices shall be approved by the engineer prior to placement. Traffic control devises shall conform to the appropriate MN Department of Transportation Standards. 5. In accordance with generally accepted construction practices, the contractor will be solely and completely responsible for the conditions on the job site, including safety for all persons and property during the performance of the work. This requirement will apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. 6. The duty of the engineer or developer to conduct construction review of the contractors performance is not intended to include review of the adequacy of the contractors safety measures in, or near the construction site. 7. Before beginning construction the contractor shall install erosion and sedimentation control measures in accordance with NPDS permit requirements, best management practices, state and local requirements and the details shown on the detail sheet(s) of the project plan set. 8. All construction permits, applications and fees are the responsibility if the contractor. 9. All entrance and connections to city streets shall be constructed per the requirements of the state and local jurisdictions, The contractor shell be responsible for all permits and notifications as required. 10. All street repairs and patching shall be preformed per the requirements of the city. All traffic control shall be provided by the contractor and shall be established per the requirements the MN manual of uniform traffic control devices and the city. This shall include all signage, barricades, flashers and flaggers as needed. All public streets shall be open to traffic at all times. 11. Adjust all existing structures, both public and private to the proposed grades where disturbed and comply with all requirements of the utility owners. Structures being reset to paved areas must meet owners requirements for traffic loading. 12. Existing conditions topographic survey provided by others. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, SILVER FOX, Wright County, Minnesota. PROJECT BENCHMARKS Benchmark 1: Rebar located 5' inside the south property line, approximately 130' from the SW lot corner. Benchmark 2: Top nut hydrant approximately 195' south of the intersection of Cedar St and Oakwood Dr E, on the north side of Oakwood Dr. Benchmark 3: Approximately 1,160 ft to the NE from the NW lot corner. Monticello, MN Site Plan Application December 04, 2023 VICINITY MAP Monticello Township Big Lake Township keroaa'ay st City of Big Lake .. . B-3 - - 155 1ilk � � ' '�i5523aoioto C.ItM44 a - l i B.3':' 4P IWO B-3 155[V100707U ~ 4 l -A ir .._�3 F 1 s B-3 'THOMAS P.A-RK �R rr i B-3 B-3 B-3 B-4 3001011 -.._ °`, SITE B-3 ® B-3 B-2 49 I 1B -AL* Y Q / IB -3 I B-4 r q- �mow- B-3 _ '15511N 1', r2B-3 CHLLtiI Af211 B-4 y u ! 1'Vise B-4 B-4 B-4 a B-2 B-3 -- Surrounding Zoning Districts (T yp)244001( WARNING The contractor shall be responsible for calling for locations of all existing utilities. They shall cooperate with all utility companies in maintaining their service and / or relocation of lines The contractor shall contact "Gopher State One Call" at least 48 hours in advance for the locations for all underground wires, cables, conduits, pipes, manholes, valves or other buried structures before digging. The contractor shall repair or replace the above when damaged during construction at no cost to the owner. SHEET INDEX & SUBMITTALS co N O N CD N C0.0 - Civil Title Sheet C1.0 - Existing Conditions C1.1 - Demolition & Removals C2.0 - Site Plan C3.0 - Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control C4.0 - Utility Plan C5.0 - Lighting Plan C7.0 - Civil Details C7.1 - Civil Details C7.2 - Civil Details C7.3 - Civil Details X X X X X X X Land & Resource Consulting X X X PROJECT CONTACTS OWNERS 688 Bryant, LLC Josh Peterson 301 W. County Road E2 612-290-6266 New Brighton, MN 55112 peterson.josh82@gmail.com CIVIL Land & Resource Consulting Randy Hedlund ENGINEER 14260 23rd Ave N 763-330-0864 Plymouth, MN 55447 RandyH@landandresource.com ARCHITECT Lampert Architects Laurel Schmidt 420 Summit Ave. 763-755-1211 St. Paul, MN 55102 laurel@lampert-arch.com SURVEY Burt Surveying, LLC Brandon King Fountain City, WI 54629 608-687-4100 bklsllc@gmail.com DRAWINGS BY W L I % %o Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Profe-zi nNn�inrlar thA� laws of the S;W� O O 4l:V Ran II C. He d MN. Lic. No. 19576�� Date: �O ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE C ivi I Title Sheet SHEET NUMBER C0.0 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting / 0 a 0 (/ I 1 I n I I / I ' n SSMH--\,,. Rim=959.40 1=945.40 n / SS � ST i 1 CC - STMH 5010 STMH 5008 Rim=960.38 Rim=959.40 ST 1=954.28- 1=953.30(N) 1=955.46(W)(AB) STMH 5009-I C / 54" MH Rim=959.14 U 1=955.51(N)(AB) / 1=954.27(E)(AB) 1=953.84 /7 O/ OZ 1=953.49 Rim=957.49 A < ST � J � / / / -STMH 5569 Rim=957.57 / / n / a' 1=951.72 J � STMH 5571-� t1=953.34 =957.46 u � \ �A / f'C o� 0� / \ --STMH 5574 \ \� Rim=957.95 i CB 5576 / ST / / CC i Rim=957.95 / TMH 5571A-� 1=953.803.80 Rim .06(A 8 ST / 411- 0 O ! `CB 5575 \ \ �j Rim=957.68 1=953.23 \ Rrr��7 / / O ST -STMH 5576A / � � 1w7 \ Rim=958.14 CB 5580A �► / 1=953.06(AB) Rim=958.37 O / -/� 44/ i1=954.12 CB Rim=958.01 / / O� 2� /9'd/p s@ ��r PcA �� \ PROJEC\ �I 1=954.56 / 0 ��/i X21 _ BENCHMARK �D / Top ~f' /X� �C , NUT HYDRANT a\ t ELE=961.00 � # / CB 55 Rim=957.8 OIC' \sd -953.57 �� do CCB 5580 � i� Rim=95958.72 1=953.67 to \CB 5581 --Rinn=959.82 p� / \ 'r� ` Q C 15" RCP '/ 1=95376(AB) Lot 2 Block 1 L�\J -STMH 5578 ��' Rim=958.98 - - - - 1=952.69(AB) 1=952.81(AB) A t CB 558\ Rim=960.04 1=954.22(AB) --SSMH Rim=959.67 1=941.87 Existina Conditions 1. Existing conditions shown are based on actual field survey, City of Monticello utility records and utility service provider records and is approximate. Existing conditions shall be verified prior to the start of construction and any inconsistencies shall be reported to the engineer or owner/developer immediately. 2. Soil boring locations shown are approximate. Refer to the geotechnical investigation completed by Chosen Valley Testing dated July, 17, 2023. nd - - Section Line Property Line ROW Easement Overhead Electric - - - 900 - Existing Contour - minor - - - - 900 - Existing Contou - major GAS Underground Gas uc Underground Cable 1 Water > Storm » Sanitary Sewer • Found Iron Monument Hydrant Power Pole Light Pole Sign TBX \ Telephone Box?? CABX \ Cable Box?? Catch Basin ST Storm Manhole SS Sanitary Sewer Manhole 4 / Know what's NOW. Call before you dig. DRAWINGS BY LIItv Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plaj specification, or report was prepared by6under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Professi &nrnder t�laws of the St innO ell �n V Ran II C. He d �MN. Lic. No. 1957iP Date: Q0 ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Existing Conditions SHEET NUMBER C1.0 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting / A /� - \ ST << J / -STMH 55 69 Rim=957.57 STMH 5571--l) 1=951.72 m=957.46 I/ c /J / / \ I / 1=953.34 QOo \ / A / ST TMH 5571A -t \ / Vim=957.98 1/1 j / A 1=952.06(AB) 4 / / 1=953.2 �� 0 A � ,,yam" / � � 60_ � \ CB 5572--� / /9� S \ / Rim=958.01 �jLG. v 1954.56 $ �C co / I A �� I ID Sawcutra d remove'burb to i near t joint. S e Sheet Q2.0 f limits of egiovals °�`� SSMH Rim=959.40 J / �\ ° 0 1=945.40 SS e ST r TMH 5010 i _ STMH 5008 Rim=960.38 0 ° Rim=959.40 ST 1=954.28-� 1.0(N) 46(W)O / / STMH 5009-t 54" MH ^ Rim=959.14 1=955.51(N)(AB)� 1=954.2953. 1= 4 � 1=953.84 I -STMH 5011 \ Rim=960.81 \ U 1=955.75(S)(AB) \ 1 / / 1=955.04(E)(AB) \ 1=954.71- -JI ivino IVH i Rim=957.49 \ 1=953.49 \ Sawcut and remove / \\ sidewalk to nearest \\ joint. See Sheet C2.0 / for limits of removals / 5574 n=957.95 \ / .-CB'S576 )51.72(AB Rim=957,95 / 1=953.80 \ _ oQ L \ / ST -STMH 5576A \ Rim=958.14 gyp„ /.-CB 80A 1=953.06(AB) O�� Rim- 58.37 O / Rte• � � J o1�� \/1=954.1 cp POJ ECT / \ �� \ \ BEf�CHMARK �C TOP%1,T J ' HYDRANT \ ELE=961.00\ / 957 8 OI" x.57 \ \ �� y `� CB 5580 Rim=2 1=953.67 CB 5581 �- Rim=959.82 11' Rrn ./ _ 1=953.76(AB) t � CB 5582 Rim=960.04 1=954.22(AB) \ / \ \ --STMH 5013 _Rim--96IL98- - - - -961- - \ / / I 1=955.73 \ \ \ N:215730.01 / E:521866.55 i,-------- / Lot 2 Block 1 / / Demolition and Clearin 1. All temporary erosions control measures shall be installed and inspected prior to the start of construction. Refer to sheet 3.1 for erosion prevention and sedimentation control measures utilized. 2. Contractor shall obtain permits for demolition, removals, clearing, grubbing and disposal prior to the start of construction. 3. Dimensions illustrating the limits of demolition and removals are approximate. Coordinate the actual limits of demolition with the proposed improvements. 4. Schedule and complete public roadway demolition and replacement to minimize impacts to traffic. 5. All lane closures and work within the public right-of-way shall be reported to the City of Monticello and Wright County 7 days prior to the start of construction. 6. Emergency access shall through the construction areas shall be maintained throughout the course of construction. 7. Contractor shall provide barricades, lights, signs traffic control and other measures necessary to ensure safe traffic flow during the course of construction. 8❑ Features not designated to be removed shall be protected during the course of construction. Damage to features not designated for removal or altered as part of this project shall be repaired or replaced at no additional cost to the developer, city or county 9. Trees designated for removal includes the root structure. Trees on or near the limits of grading or removals shall be saved unless noted otherwise on the plans. Trees and stumps may be ground onsite. Chipped materials shall not be mixed into subgrade materials under any structures. 10. Contractor shall remove all features including, but not limited to underground utilities, fence, walls, footings, walls, lighting, signs, stairs, and landscaping within the grading and demolition limits unless otherwise noted on the plans. 11. Coordinate removal, termination, and reuse of existing utilities and appurtenances with service providers. Restore all disturbed utilities or coordinate repair/replacement with the utility service providers. 12. Exiting conduits and underground pipes may be abandon in-place if filled properly with sand or flowable fill if the existing utilities are ore not in conflict with existing or proposed utilities or structures. Termination of a utility shall be completed in accordance with the utility service provider's standards. 13. Demolition debris shall become property of the contractor unless noted otherwise on the plans. All construction debris shall be removed from the site to an approved location. 14. Report the presence of wells and drain fields and septic tanks to the engineer and owner. • 4 / Know what's bein. Call before you dig. DRAWINGS BY qr LI%v Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Profe-inin�inrlar thA� laws of the S;eA� O O`N_ V Ran II C. He ibnd MN. Lic. No. 19576` �O Date: ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Demolition & Removals Plan SHEET NUMBER C1.1 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting \ General Site Notes 1. For surveying and construction staking, contact Land & Resource Consulting 763.340.0699. 2. Dimensions are to outside foundation wall, back of curb or edge of bituminous pavement unless noted \ otherwise on the drawings. 3. The building and structure location and orientation is shown on the plans in relation to the property : B-3 Adjacent Zonin Adjacent Zoning: B-3 \ boundary and right-of-way. � Highway Business g 4. Building and structure dimensions are approximate. Architectural and structural plans shall be utilized to \ District Highway hwa Business stake the new structures and buildings. District 5. Erosion control and sedimentation control measures shall be installed and inspected prior to the start of construction. C7.2 Sidewalk \ 3 Detail 6. City infrastructure shall be built in accordance with Monticello material and construction methods. In the ° event of a discrepancy, the City Standards shall govern. d� \ 7. Improvements within the County right-of-way shall be constructed in accordance with County Construction 2�SrA Standards. In the event of a discrepancy, the County Standards shall govern. // Commercial Driveway Access / Adjacent Zoning: B-3 / Highway Business District Zoning & Setback Summary Existing Zoning Designation: B-3 Highway Business District Building Setback Requirements: Front Yard: 30' Rear Yard: 20' Side Yard (Interior): 10' Side Yard (Street): 20' Parking Setback: 6' Minimum Lot Size: No minimum Minimum Lot Width: 100' Maximum Height: 30' (2 floors) Area Summary Existing: Pervious: 35,265 sf 0.81 ac 100% Impervious: 0 sf 0.00 ac 0% Total 35,265 sf 0.81 ac 100% Proposed: Pervious: 7,490 sf 0.18 ac 23% Impervious: 27,325 sf 0.63 ac 77% Total 35,265 sf 0.81 ac 100% / / / / / Zoning & Setback Summary Existing Zoning Designation: B-3 Highway Business District Building Setback Requirements: Front Yard: 30' Rear Yard: 20' Side Yard (Interior): 10' Side Yard (Street): 20' Parking Setback: 6' Minimum Lot Size: No minimum Minimum Lot Width: 100' Maximum Height: 30' (2 floors) Area Summary Existing: Pervious: 35,265 sf 0.81 ac 100% Impervious: 0 sf 0.00 ac 0% Total 35,265 sf 0.81 ac 100% Proposed: Pervious: 7,490 sf 0.18 ac 23% Impervious: 27,325 sf 0.63 ac 77% Total 35,265 sf 0.81 ac 100% Buildinq Sum Building Gross Floor Area: 2,104 sf Projected # of Employees: See Architectural Plans Number of Seats: See Architectural Plans Parkina Summa Parking Requirement: Dining Area - (900 sf) 1 sp per 40 sf floor area = 23 spaces Pick -Up Counter Area - (126 sf )1 sp per 15 sf floor area = 9 spaces Kitchen Area - (855 sf ) 1 sp per 80 sf floor area = 11 spaces Required Parking Count: 43 stalls Provided Parking Count (Total): 48 stalls Standard: 46 Accessible: 2 Parking Stall Dimensions: 9'x 20' Parking Aisle Dimensions: 24' wide Legend ()Parking Count • 4 Know what's NOW. Call before you dig. DRAWINGS BY -.4 L I\v Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Professi nginggr under t� laws of the St inn O V Ran II C. He d �� MN. Lic. No. 19576 Date: ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Site Plan SHEET NUMBER C2.0 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting C -�� - /- JIIVIn JO/VH N << O Z � Rim=957.49 \ A \ _ ST << / O 1=953.49 \ \ )-STMH 5569 Rim=957.57 5571-�) 1=951.72 S14 0 / R im=957.46 I/ \ / 1=953.34 \OZ / A ,, \ �--STM H 5574 \ / / / \ Rim=957.95 \ CBM76 \ ST _ / \ / 1=951.72(AB) / yRim=95895 �\ / J _ � / TMW�571A-) 1=953.80 \ / Wim=957.98 lid 1=952.06(AB) / / / ST J Q L \ \ / 1 1 p /`-CB557\5 Rim=957\.68\ 1=953.23 /950-\ / / Q�j' \ S -ST 7 d T MH 5576A Rim=958.14 \-CB soA \ oh / �► - \ \ R 1=953.06(AB) O Rim�58.37\ \ A / / / \ � J y7L \,1-954.1 / CB 5572- � / � OZ� � so \ � � � ,2PcA � T�O \ � \ \ / Rim=958.01 2 0 1 ^ \ a \ 1 \ Oq 1=954.56 / / / / ° � /�^ � s \ \ � � �C , / \ CB 5 Q / / / LQ \ \ Rim=957 3.57 / / I / 5$90♦ S 5 \ C� LO -CB5580 \/ Rim=9 2 1-953.67 \ / A / `° I \-CB 5581 Zu / Sy U \ \� C� \ \ J i \ i� Rim=959.82 ° O� /80 1 RCP \ 1=953.76(AB) 960 5g•s5 �O �� \ J , ' \ 960 _ O h /y0 S% \ v. -STMH MCIO 61 s1c Rm95898 '01ST -----�1=952.69(AB) 6 1=952.81(AB)A 0 \ \ \ \ -CB 5582 soa p7� 'S99 s`9,g� X01\° •\ ° J Rim=960.04 A S \ 1=954.22(AB) \ a ' r�p0 \ ° \� \ ~ \ SF ° �Ir Sd% %•� S9 9g \ \9s0579 - L / A _� ea �� ' Sp `6 5 �j' Rim=958 8 / Rock Construction C7.0 / a ( SF \° ? k��R �y✓Oh 60.40 1=954, Entrance 2 ' 104 9 960 d OZ O�� \ 6�So 260 F�`\96, °1°�h o a a J J N J a �� 6��0 ° ad / 961 +Gj)O98 \ 6 So oeo\ a SS 4) _� °z o s e ! \ shoo �o� \ r � � k 1,50 ss� � 6ps8 •Ooo A/ y g61 S0 ° 6� 05 68 SS ST s SF EOF S9�A / I Denotes Tip o$o / \962 is / 6 46 �� Out Curb 6 \ tiry STMH 5008-�1 / C� TMH 5010 /lV j _ ,,_ �0601'z (Typ) ^ Rim=959.40 1=953.30(N) 1=955.46(w)(AB) Rim=960.38 O� 1=954.28-� STMH 5009- 54" MH / Rim=959.14 1=955.51(N)(AB) / 1=954.27(E)(AB) / 1=953.84 1 / / 1 Q /co ° -0 / I / V, 1 // -STMH 5011 Rim=960.81 / 1=955.75(S)(AB) 1=955.04(E)(AB) 1=954.71 \--STMH 5013 l - Rirm--960-98- - - - 1=955.73 i' C7.0 Inlet 3 Protection Typ. Eel Silt C7.0 Fence 1 \N 6% + / ° \ 4.23% co y rn 40 Lot ALF \ w, \ sg9s � Lot 2 Block 1 / / / / / General Grading & Erosion Control Notes 1. For surveying and construction staking, contact Land & Resource Consulting 763.340.0699. 2. Erosion control measures shall be installed prior to the start of construction. 3. Install inlet protection: Wimco RD or CG models or approved equal. Inspect, clean and maintain inlet protection though the course of construction. 4. Soil disturbance and grading practices shall be minimized and staged as much as possible. Restoration and stabilization shall be installed in accordance with the SWPPP time requirements or sooner. 5. All erosion control practices shown are to be considered the minimum. Additional erosion control practices, measures and materials may be necessary to stabilize sediment within the construction site during during construction. 6. All grading, erosion/sedimentation control shall be in accordance with the minimum SWPPP notes on Sheet 3.2. 7. Infiltration areas shall be protected during the course of construction to prevent migration of sediment into the infiltration areas. Sediment must removed from the basin bottom and the surface shall the roughed and scarified to achieve the original infiltration rates. 8. Surface stabilization and turf shall meet the following standards: Item MnDOT Ref. Spec. Sod MnDOT 3878 Seed MnDOT 3876 Apply MN Type 21-111 @ 100 Ib./acre - Temporary Erosion Control (May 1 - July 31) Apply MN Type 21-112 @ 100 Ib./acre - Temporary Erosion Control (Aug. 1 - Oct. 31) Apply MN Type 25-151 /2 120 Ib./acre - Permanent Turf Mulch MnDOT 3882 Install MN Type 1 @ 2 ton/acre - Disc anchored Erosion Control Blanket MnDOT 3885 Install MN Type 3N (12 mo.) or Type 4N (24 mo.) Fertilizer MnDOT 3881 Apply in accordance with product standards. MN 9. Refer to Geotechnical Investigation completed by Chosen Valley Testing, Inc dated 07/17/2023 for grading, backfill, soil corrections, compaction and groundwater conditions. Contact Chosen Valley Testing during the course of construction to perform material and compaction testing. 10. Clear and grub construction area. Stockpile topsoil for reuse. Paving Notes 11. Spot Elevations at curblines indicate flowlines unless noted otherwise. See Sheet C4.0 for rim elevations of catch basins. 12. Grades between proposed spot elevations shall be continuous and nonvariable. Spot Elevations shall govern over contour lines. 13. Meet and Match existing curb. Transition as Needed. 14. Concrete Joints Install joints as shown and align across sidewalks, curbs, and pavement, paying attention to spacing of expansion joints. Joint spacing shall be as follows: a.Tooled joints: Divide panels into nominally equal areas unless shown otherwise. b. Expansion Joints: Sidewalks - 40 feet max.; Curbs - 60 feet max.; Pavement: 80 feet max.; Adjacent to building foundations and stoops. c. Contraction Joints: Sidewalks - 8 to 10 feet; Curbs and Aprons - 12 to 15 feet. 15. Accessible Parking Stalls and adjacent access aisles shall not exceed a 2.00% slope in any direction. 16. Accessible Routes shall have a maximum cross slope of 2.00% and a maximum running slope of 5.00%. 17. Adjust all structure rims to match pavement elevations. nd -SF- Silt Fence Inlet Protection Vehicle Tracking Pad Tip Out Curb -------------- Grade Break 59.90 Spot Elevation Storm pipe • 4 / Know what's belt. Call before you dig. DRAWINGS BY 1 Llxv Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Professi ngin r under tb laws of the St inn -y O V Ran II C. He d MN. Lic. No. 19576` Date: �O ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan SHEET NUMBER C3.0 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting t 1 STMH 5008 Rim=959.40 1=953.30(N) 1=955.46(W)(AB) -�Z- OZ �-aliwn�oIUH << O Rim=957.49 A ST953.49 I J n Q -STMH 55 69 Rim=957.57 STMH 5571-1 1=951.72c � J / Rim=957.46 1=953.34 �O o z� J A ,� / / \ --STMH5574 � Rim=957.95 i �-CB 5576 ST 1=951.72(AB) Rim=957.95 TMH 5571A -t CB 5575 1=953.80 Rim=957.98 14 RIM=957.69 T 1=952.06(AB) S I J Q \ 1=953.43 (12") S �Q O /� �' CB 5575 / Rim=957.68\ J � 1=953.23 o J � Qq /� R�7/ ^ ° ST -STMH 5576A /1 �`� 12 / gym=958.14 R 1=953.06(AB) J q�� CB 5572 s Rim=958.01 O � N a �cA \ o 0 �l 1=954.56 (�► 4% CBMH 1 ^ J CONNECT TO EXISTING J a� RIM=958.90 c+) /1 - Qj 10-954.60 (12") N � t�CB55 SAN. SEWER STUB. W/ PROPERTY LINE RISER V SUMP=950.60 81953.57 8 1=953.98 ~�L 10=945.81 (FIELD VERIFY) / �O� Q° 8 LF 6" SAN @ 2.00% CONNECT TO EXISTING IVQ 4" C900 WATER STUB oo \ 4" GATE VALVE (FIELD VERIFY) SANITARY CLEANOUT CASTING: FORD Al a / O (TYP.) A a a G a d pr so s A �� _ ` ° eOVA) c Rim: / Z 10, °bbi�s Is ��y a a a di a n Ci a a n d c a r / �0 B'lo1 n CBMH 2 RIM=959.46 SS 10=955.46 (12") SW SUMP=951.46 °\ qTnnH .rn1n STMH 5009- 54" MH Rim=959.14 1=955.51(N)(AB) 1=954.27(E)(AB) 1=953.84 co I Lot 2 Block 1 -CB 5580A Rim=958.37 \/I=954.12 i /_CB 5580 iRim=958.72 j 1=953.67 i -STMH 5578 Rim=958.98 1=952.69(AB) \ 1=952.81(AB) J Utilitv Notes 1. For surveying and construction staking, contact Land & Resource Consulting 763.340.0699. 2. Erosion control measures shall be installed prior to the start of construction. 3. Obtain all necessary permits prior to the start of construction. 4. Contact all utility service providers a minimum of 72 hours prior to the start of construction. 5. Pipe Materials Storm Sewer: 12"-18" RCP Class 5 (ASTM C76) 21" and greater Class 4 (ASTM C76) Sanitary Sewer: PVC SDR 35, SDR 26 Service: PVC Schedule 40 Watermain: C900 PVC Service: C900 PVC 6. Contractor shall field verify horizontal and vertical location of all utilities prior to the start of construction. 7. Contractor shall investigate, excavate and expose existing utilities at crossings and potential conflicts prior to the start of utility installation. Report inconsistencies to the engineer and owner immediately. 8. Pipe lengths on the plans are measures from center of structure to center of structure. -CB 5581 9. Tracer wire shall be installed for all non-conductive underground utilities in accordance with Monticello i� Rim=959.82 1=953.76(AB) Standards. 10. Refer to lighting plan to coordinate electric conduit installation and potential conflicts. 11. Compaction and backfill shall be in accordance with the geotechnical investigation and the Monticello construction and design practices. 12. Testing frequency shall be in accordance with the geotechnical engineer and Monticello Standards. 13. Proposed driveway culverts shall be individually approved by the Monticello on a case-by-case basis. 14. Watermain is to have minimum cover of 7.5 feet Ind < Sanitary - Storm NOTES Water ® Catch Basin O Storm Manhole ss Sanitary Manhole Storm Sewer Schedule STRUCTURE NUMBER DIAM. CASTING DETAIL NOTES CBMH 1 48' R -3067-V 4002 4' SUMP CBMH 2 48' R -3067-V 4002 4' SUMP 4 / Know what's NOW. Call before you dig. DRAWINGS BY -.4 LIItv Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an I m a duly Licensed Professi gin r under t4N4 laws of the St inn,O Ran II C. He d MN. Lic. No. 19576 Date: VO ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Utility Plan SHEET NUMBER C4.0 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ -opo \ \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 I 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0. 9s 0 0.0 b.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 .2/ 0.2 0.2 0.1 t.1 0. 0.11 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 • 5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 • • 0.0 0.0� .0 0.0 0.0 J � 0.0// 0. 0 �1� / ` -959. \ 0. //0.3 0. ---0.2F-_\P. 0.2\\0.3 0. \0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 ,4 0.6 0.8 _0.7 \6 0 6\, .,W 0 II 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Canopy Lights- \ Wall Mounted Ligh CALLOUT SYMBOL QUANTITY DESCRIPTION BALLAST MOUNTING MODEL ----------I' I DSX2 LED P4 40K T4M MVOLT / I 0.0 0.0 DM / �� 3 I / I 1 I LED P4 40K T4M I I / I 0.0 0. TYPE 3 EXTREME BACKLIGHT CONTROL MVOLT G1 / / h 01 0.0 0 \968, _ - CEILING LIGHTOLIER L2 ® 3 LYTECASTER LED 51N 1000LM ROUND ELECTRONIC 0.2 0. 120V 1 P 2W 0.0 \ \0.0 / / I d. o o. e o. L5R10927VB-L5RDW < L3 1 WDGE3 LED WITH P1 - PERFORMANCE ELECTRONIC WALL MOUNT 0.0 q.0 120V 1 P 2W 0.0 PACKAGE, 4000K, 70CR1, TYPE 3 OPTIC 0. 0.1 R3 40K 0. 0.0\ 0.0 0.0 / 0 a 0.0 0.0 0.0� .0 0.0 0.0 J � 0.0// 0. 0 �1� / ` -959. \ 0. //0.3 0. ---0.2F-_\P. 0.2\\0.3 0. \0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 ,4 0.6 0.8 _0.7 \6 0 6\, .,W 0 II 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Canopy Lights- \ Wall Mounted Ligh Pole Light (Typ Liahtina Schedule LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE CALLOUT SYMBOL QUANTITY DESCRIPTION BALLAST MOUNTING MODEL ----------I' DSX2 LED P4 40K T4M MVOLT / DM L1 �� 3 ELECTRONIC 1 I LED P4 40K T4M I I N\ TYPE 3 EXTREME BACKLIGHT CONTROL MVOLT G1 .1 0.0 0\0 0.0 \968, _ - CEILING LIGHTOLIER L2 ® 3 Pole Light (Typ Liahtina Schedule LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE CALLOUT SYMBOL QUANTITY DESCRIPTION BALLAST MOUNTING MODEL VOLTS DSX2 LED P4 40K T4M MVOLT Lithonia Lighting, DSX2 DM L1 �� 3 ELECTRONIC POLE LED P4 40K T4M 120V 1 P 2W TYPE 3 EXTREME BACKLIGHT CONTROL MVOLT G1 .1 0.0 0\0 0.0 \968, _ - CEILING LIGHTOLIER L2 ® 3 LYTECASTER LED 51N 1000LM ROUND ELECTRONIC 0.2 0. 120V 1 P 2W 0.0 \ \0.0 0.0 L5R10927VB-L5RDW L3 1 WDGE3 LED WITH P1 - PERFORMANCE ELECTRONIC WALL MOUNT Lithonia Lighting, WDGE3 LED P1 70CR1 120V 1 P 2W PACKAGE, 4000K, 70CR1, TYPE 3 OPTIC 0. 0.1 R3 40K 0. 0.2 0.1 0.1 \0.0 �� y X 0.1\0.1 DM 0.0\\0.0 2 .1 .1 0.0 0\0 0.0 \968, _ - d \ 0.2 0. 0.0 \ \0.0 0.0 0. 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0\ 0.0 0.0 X0.1 \ 9s9 0. 0. 0.2 \ 0.1 1° 0.1 0.0\ 0.0 0.0 \ \960 \ \ ° \ 1` 0.2\ 0. 0.3 0.2 0.2 0. .1 0.0 0.0 2 \ 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 0. 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ /\\962\\ // \ / 1 4 Know what's NOW. Call before you dig. DRAWINGS BY L1% Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Professi ngin r under t4N, laws of the St inn O Ran II C. He d MN. Lic. No. 19576 Date: ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Lighting Plan SHEET NUMBER C5.0 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting NOTE: CASTINGS AND VALVE BOXES NOT ADJ JSTED WITHIN THE TOLERANCES SHOWN SHALL BE READJUSTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE, 5/8 MIN 3/8 IN. 3/4 "MAX 2.009, 5/8 MAX. ---.. FRAME CASTING ON CENTERLINE Standard Plate Library City of Monticello ROADWAY FINISHED BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE GRADE Title: Adjustment of Standard Frame and Cover Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 1003 03-15 Standard Frame & Cover Adjustment No Scale TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED \ AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/ DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Typical Trench Detail No Scale Title: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 1007 / Gravel pod(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap Bedding Geotextile fabric Original -- � grade o v 0 SECTION B–B (not to scale) Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates v v v v v Original Geotextile fabric SECTION A–A grade (not to scale) NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trapping device C -D Z 1= cn xl W Match Existing Grade �C A I OL I Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates I \� A A B o o v E o v v v o O U 0 o v -0 0 O v O - v o o v o i o O B Slope away from 24' min. highway 50' min. or Right of Way Standard Plate Library J City of Monticello Rock Construction Entrance No Scale Title: Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6002 FINISHED BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE GRADE 3/8 MIN. 5/8 FRAME _ BARREL TO CONFORM USE NEENAH R1755—G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS CASTING AND GATE VALVE NOT ON CENTERLINE 5/8 MIN 3/8 IN. 3/4 "MAX 2.009, 5/8 MAX. ---.. FRAME CASTING ON CENTERLINE Standard Plate Library City of Monticello ROADWAY FINISHED BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE GRADE Title: Adjustment of Standard Frame and Cover Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 1003 03-15 Standard Frame & Cover Adjustment No Scale TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED \ AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/ DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Typical Trench Detail No Scale Title: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 1007 / Gravel pod(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap Bedding Geotextile fabric Original -- � grade o v 0 SECTION B–B (not to scale) Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates v v v v v Original Geotextile fabric SECTION A–A grade (not to scale) NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trapping device C -D Z 1= cn xl W Match Existing Grade �C A I OL I Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates I \� A A B o o v E o v v v o O U 0 o v -0 0 O v O - v o o v o i o O B Slope away from 24' min. highway 50' min. or Right of Way Standard Plate Library J City of Monticello Rock Construction Entrance No Scale Title: Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6002 Slope Trackin No Scale OF 1EGHT FLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC * FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN C -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Title: (� Inlet Protection Standard Plate Library Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6004 Inlet Protection -Catch Basin Insert No Scale MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT USE R-2 JOINT FOR / USE NEENAH R -1642—A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS _ BARREL TO CONFORM USE NEENAH R1755—G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS TO ASTM C-478 I I LETTERING TO READ: of a MOId SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER m¢ m� WOC¢ as OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS U��a IiU APPLICABLE. ¢of oam NEENAH R-1642 WITH ¢�� 0¢m i W D _ TYPE B SOLID LID � Z MACHINE BEARING OR EQUAL CED_M0 N�oTER yc I aW z Q w W CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) m W 2 REPEAT OPPOSITE SIDE j 3: SOW II EXCEPT FOR LETTERING N li Q W H 2534" / 1 1/2 " <azon 7" z ix o BEARIN 3SURFACE TO BE MACHINED L 24" U J U J 28 1/2 " �R a� 36" QU N 4N d COVER FRAME fz¢ z Qw Title: > Standard Frame W (n Standard Plate Library and Cover City of Monticello Date: Plate No. �0 lWi 03_ 05 Z JW 1002 z ¢� - Revised: 03-15 V J W= UO -W Ozi Slope Trackin No Scale OF 1EGHT FLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC * FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN C -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Title: (� Inlet Protection Standard Plate Library Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6004 Inlet Protection -Catch Basin Insert No Scale MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT USE R-2 JOINT FOR / ALL MANHOLE JOINTS _ BARREL TO CONFORM 'I I 'rr{{ IIIcrI TO ASTM C-478 I I LATEST REVISION of a STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" - MAX 12" 27• plA WITH EXTERNAL OR I' `o INTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL � I a T� 48" DIA Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Standard Manhole No Scale Title: Cone Section, Casting Steps, and Adjusting Rings Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 1001 l N rVlO I m o 03 x¢<w.> W~J O O 2 0Ram wow 00z as of a MOId w= m¢ m� WOC¢ as W V1 U��a IiU z ¢of oam 0 ¢�� 0¢m i W D a N rVlO JJp E o OF=a 4aWU x¢<w.> W~J m N 0Ram wow 00z as L,MWw 2�V U DO z m�LL�U WZF`m WOC¢ as J d N o U��a IiU N ¢of oam U ¢�� 0¢m i W D ¢.Im J W N a v cd y Z U OZ¢ U¢R a0Owa _,U) WOO NWO JQ OX 0- O W wz< Ni<p Z E o wW 'vmin o m pF_ a m� o a 'C W O I �m ate' II E-,�W(=j Fm 0W LL U U („) J > ¢ Q = i II ¢0 NzWZ ¢ zWZo II ii J H w o � Z CED_M0 Td X C aW z Q w W m W 2 2 j 3: SOW II Z F Q N li Q W H <azon z ix o U J U J 2 2 0 a MH QU N 4N d fz¢ z Qw > W (n a <0fw ZD mNH �0 lWi Z JW z ¢� - W V J W= UO -W Ozi D O W W E �m N w JO f O �> w AW N Ow ¢ m ~WWJNO NO 1 ¢o02< H•0 O as a ED W n z R a Ww mz g J� W 0 W U NOW U K W N� N z Q L5O w . V) 00 0 W OJ w JOO w 4a \� Fpm W�ZW a z mz o W0' O NO¢d O �0 LL z N W J Q ¢ N 1¢i- O=F=Wz �V=1 WZV3 p DULL N p ww � UW Jw U N J m K }N zNl-J) D H"O V �z�MF - W F w 2 Y N 2 N m Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Silt Fence No Scale a w O " I � D_W 4�d Ldm dow N W H II J LL. II Z LEI i. 0 N V ' Q LL. O Z E o m 'vmin o IN p a m� ov 'C W O I �m ate' II II Fm L OD a w O " I � D_W 4�d Ldm dow N W H II J LL. II Z LEI i. 0 N V ' Q LL. O N W W O ND zQf 0 > M e II I II II II Y T II 3 II 3 II y 0 I I V I I Vl •' II rn o' A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Title: Residential Building Erosion Control late: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 6006 03-15 0 3 0' 3.3' 3.3' • • 1.6' 20" 3.3. • • .3' 0 0 0 • • • • 0.7 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 1.15 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 3.75 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 4:1 SLOPES 3'1 SLOPES HIGH FLOW CHANNEL & SHORELINE 36 12' I 3A O I }: 2 Q 3' I- 0 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET INA 6" (15cm) DEEP X 6' (15cm) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30-) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR TME BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30-) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12' (30-) PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM, STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2"-5' (5c 12.Sc ) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3" (1.5-) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30-) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. NOTE'. 'IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15-) MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Stapling Patterns & Installation n Date: Plate No. 03-08 Revised: 03-15 601 1 Erosion Control Blanket Installation No Scale DRAWINGS BY LlIv Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION 1 hereby certify that this plan,specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Professi ngin r under t� laws of the St inner 0 Gr RanII C. He d � MN. Lic. No. 19576 co Date: Q0 ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Civil Construction Details SHEET NUMBER C7.0 Copyright Land &Resource Consulting Z Bdp; O_ H 'vmin o IN p a ONmc . 'gym w H N W O I �m ate' II V D Z o` O u w U U („) a..�a II i II Z Q II ii � Z 1 ,o W Td X C W j 3: SOW II N N W W O ND zQf 0 > M e II I II II II Y T II 3 II 3 II y 0 I I V I I Vl •' II rn o' A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Title: Residential Building Erosion Control late: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 6006 03-15 0 3 0' 3.3' 3.3' • • 1.6' 20" 3.3. • • .3' 0 0 0 • • • • 0.7 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 1.15 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 3.75 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 4:1 SLOPES 3'1 SLOPES HIGH FLOW CHANNEL & SHORELINE 36 12' I 3A O I }: 2 Q 3' I- 0 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET INA 6" (15cm) DEEP X 6' (15cm) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30-) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR TME BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30-) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12' (30-) PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM, STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2"-5' (5c 12.Sc ) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3" (1.5-) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30-) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. NOTE'. 'IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15-) MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Stapling Patterns & Installation n Date: Plate No. 03-08 Revised: 03-15 601 1 Erosion Control Blanket Installation No Scale DRAWINGS BY LlIv Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION 1 hereby certify that this plan,specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Professi ngin r under t� laws of the St inner 0 Gr RanII C. He d � MN. Lic. No. 19576 co Date: Q0 ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Civil Construction Details SHEET NUMBER C7.0 Copyright Land &Resource Consulting R-4342 FRAME AND COVER IN GREEN AREAS) R-1642 FRAME AND COVER IN STREETS) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL J STEPSARD MANHOLE SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 48" DIA PROVIDE RUBBERIZED BITUMASTIC SEALER AROUND JOINT MONTICELLO CITY STANDARD MANHOLE DESIGN FLANGED SHEAR GATE - NEENAH R -5005-D1 OR APPROVED EQUAL INCIDENTAL) NOTES: 1. SHEAR GATE TO BE BOLTED TO PIPE AND MAINTAINED AT HALF OPEN POSITION. USE S.S. BOLTS AND NUTS TO FASTEN SHEAR GATE TO CONCRETE PIPE. 2. SECURE HANDLE WITH LOCK & CHAIN TO KEEP OPEN AT SPECIFIED DEPTHS. 3. PAINT SHEAR GATE WITH COAL TAR EPDXY. Title: Standard Manhole Standard Plate Library h witShear Gate City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15i 4004 Standard Storm Manhole with Shear Gate No Scale MATCH MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER (TYPICAL) T3•, °" CroTgo NOTE: STORM SEWER TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS INCLUDES A 0.10' DEPRESSION FROM THE PROPOSED GUTTER GRADE. THE CONCRETE CURB SHOULD BE TRANSITIONED FROM THE PROPOSED GUTTER GRADE TO THE CASTING ELEVATION 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CENTER OF THE CASTING. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Concrete Curb & Gutter at Catch Basin _ Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 5004 03-15 Curb and Gutter at Catch Basin No Scale L D _J 35 1/4 43" CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX O NEENAH N0. R -3067-V PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALL INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTINGRINGS MEGALUGFOR DETAILS 4" MIN - 12 MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE 6" COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 24" FINISH GRADE 31" 2" 3,- 6„ g" - 34" 4" MIN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A—A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Standard Catch Basin No Scale A Title: Standard Catch Basin Date' 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —17 4002 A 35-1/4" 143" PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA COLLAR CRETEX TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" 6" OPENING •15" 24" 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE w x •48"TYP AND PIPE CONNECTION a � 'DIMENSION VARIES BASED ON STRUCTURE DIAMETER :RCP=PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 4338 OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. rale: Standard Plate Library Catch Basin Manhole City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. �- Revised: 03-17 4003 Catch Basin Manhole No Scale USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20' TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS r FINISHED GRADE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12' ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Sanitary Sewer Cleanout No Scale Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 3006 C CASTING ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME & COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD 0 z z 8" CAST -IN-PLACE PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP m © CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE CN iv 4' TO 10' CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION of (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED z z BY ENGINEER LF -1 UJ CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O1 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. (� MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT 4 EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MANHOLE MAY BE USED OR PLASTERED MANHOLE....; CATCH EXTERIOR OR © ATCH GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY BASIN BASIN TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT DIA DIA CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Title: Standard Manhole for ��TStandard Plate Library Storm Sewer City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised 4001 '03-17 Standard Storm Sewer Manhole No Scale 1'- 0" OR 5' IN BACK OF CURB CONCRETE WALK OR BITUMINOUS PATH ARE HYDRAFINDER PRESENT FLAG WATEROUS MODEL 67 HYDRANT YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG z TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. AFTER BACK -FILL EXISTING OR FUTURE STREET BREAKOFF FLANGE CURB OR GUTTER UNE w 1" TO 2" MAXIMUM p ABOVE BURY LINE (FINISHED GRADE) FINISHED GRADE Q ii VALVE BOX AS WATERMAIN SPECIFIED _FI" TO 2" z 0 2 LAYERS OF > w 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 10' POLY (4 mil) vTYPICAL w z 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PIT i UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 C.Y. OF 1 fO o 1/4 "STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR 1-1/2" CLEAR STONE I = WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS O MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG MEGALUG GATE VALVE TEE THRUST MEGALUG BLOCKING BLOCKING BEHIND BELOW GATE THRUST HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE VALVE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15"x 15"x 4") BEHIND TEE Title: AStandard Plate Library Typical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 =--� -- � Revised: 03-17 2001 Typical Hydrant Installation No Scale 8'X 12' INSULATION AT PIPE CROSSING 8'X 20' INSULATION FOR BOX SEE PLATE 2006 MEGALUGFOR DETAILS I WATERMAIN 20 NOTE: ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10' OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTRAINED USING TIE RODS. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Watermain Offset No Scale PROPOSED STORM SEWER 45' BENDS (TYPICAL) X111 RRR I Title: Watermain Offset Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 2005 DRAWINGS BY Jnr Ll�v Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Profe-zi n h ina r I InriPr th laws of the St O� o G Ran II C. He d MN. Lic. No. 19576` Date: ISSUED FOR ISSUE I REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Civil Construction Details SHEET NUMBER C7.1 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting Per Plan Per Plan Min. Accessible Parking Stalls NO SCALE 5d Handicap Symbol of Access NO SCALE Symbol 6"x6" SIGN FACE AT � PARKING STALL IIIIIIIII=IIIIIIIII: -IIIIIIIII All Bars to be 0.25" 111111111—_ �° 111111111 LU TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC CU _— °q° High by 8" Wide Q IIIIIIIII v A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI— ROTATION 111111111 a — AT ACCESS AISLE 2"x 2" Adjustes Perorated . U) Flush Adjacent to Walks ACCESS AISLE Sign Stock. E Expansion Joint Concrete Walk NO PARKING = 1" Crown in Green Space OIII111111111 II °I T—I Steel Sign Embedded a la ° I I III Z � Minimum of 2'-6" into J I VAN ACCESSIBLE � (WHERE APPLICABLE) All lines 5" wide Provide painted symbol at each designated accessible parking at each designated accessible parking stall. Center symbol in stall near drive aisle. Accessible Signage Mount with 1/2" Stainless Steel Hardware. Note: Sinage shall meet the requirements of mn mutcd o r7 -8m and r7-8bp LLI o -a) �� _-IIIIIIII=IIIIIIIII-111111 � IIIIIIIII =11111111 IIII VIIIIIIIIII ego IIIIIIIII=IIIIIIIII: -IIIIIIIII TUBULAR POSTS SPECIFICATIONS 111111111—_ �° 111111111 LU TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC CU _— °q° CONTROL SIGNS, SHALL VARY IN LENGTH, SHALL HAVE Q IIIIIIIII v A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI— ROTATION 111111111 a — DEVICE TO PREVENT TUBE FROM TURNING, SHALL BE 2"x 2" Adjustes Perorated . U) Flush Adjacent to Walks Sign Stock. E Expansion Joint Concrete Walk = 1" Crown in Green Space OIII111111111 II °I T—I Steel Sign Embedded a la ° I I III Z Minimum of 2'-6" into J I Concrete Footing. I I° u Poured Concrete Footing a a 4 d d 12" Steel Sign Post w/ Accessible Sign NO SCALE 1.5" Bituminous Wear Course MnDOT 2360 1.5" Bituminous Base Course MnDOT 2360 6" Class 5 Aggregate Base MnDOT 3138 24" Scarify and recompact subgrade to 95% Standard proctor density. Light Duty Bituminous Paving Section NO SCALE N� N �r / 2" Bituminous Wear Course MnDOT 2360 2" Bituminous Base Course MnDOT 2360 8" Class 5 Aggregate Base MnDOT 3138 24" Scarify and recompact subgrade to 95% Standard proctor density. Heavy Duty Bituminous Paving Section NO SCALE Pavement & Sidewalk Sections No Scale B6 Style Curb and Gutter Back of Curb Nose Down Curb NO SCALE T^,„fQGC4,1nriirk ELEVATION CONTRACTION JOINTS L12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH — 6' DEPTH — 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS — *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH — 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS — 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS — 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Typical Sidewalk Standard Plate Library 03-05 City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Revised: 03-17 5012 Typical Sidewalk No Scale 2-3/8" TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL: ALUMINUM SHALL BE: 5052—H38 OR 6061—T6 ALLOY GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30" .100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE OVER 30" SIGNS SHALL BE NOTCHED FOR USE WITH E-450 BRACKETS 9" STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL HAVE 6" UPPER CASE LETTERS WHITE ON GREEN HIGH INTENSITY GRADE SHEETING WITH WHITE SERIES E BORDER ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. BOULEVARD GRADE �� _-IIIIIIII=IIIIIIIII-111111 11111111(_=111111111_-llllglll � IIIIIIIII =11111111 IIII VIIIIIIIIII ego IIIIIIIII=IIIIIIIII: -IIIIIIIII TUBULAR POSTS SPECIFICATIONS 111111111—_ �° 111111111 11111111=11111111 TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC o _— °q° CONTROL SIGNS, SHALL VARY IN LENGTH, SHALL HAVE g IIIIIIIII v A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI— ROTATION 111111111 a — DEVICE TO PREVENT TUBE FROM TURNING, SHALL BE 2-3/8" O.D., SHALL BE GALVINIZED AND SHALL HAVE A WEIGHT OF 2LB./FT. CONCRETE GROUT NOTE: CONCRETE GROUT TO BE MIXED THOROUGHLY WITH WATER BEFORE INSTALLATION NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET NAME SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED 'N\ Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Sign Installation No Scale Title: Typical Traffic Sign Installation Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0,3_15 5017 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY HORIZONTAL (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION DIVIDER PLATE 3"R 1., 6 1/2 . 3 SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT R II 6" 13 1/2 SLOPE 03%4"/FT 2" MIN" 7„ / HORIZONTAL LINE / �2 MNDOT © SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS r.=" STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0474 CU YDS / LIN FT (B612) MAY BE TILTED B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 21.1 FT / CU. YDS. (8612) DIVIDER PLATE 3"R 3� � 1/2 R. 3"R 6- 13 1/2 ;1 SLOPE RO6 FT/FT SLOPE 3/4"/FT "21' MIN - 7.1 HORIZONTAL LINE �0 MNDOT ® SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERLNI SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0582 CU YDS / LIN FT (8618) MAY BE TILTED 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 17.2 Fr / CU.YDS. (6618) 12" 3/4 " / PER FT 1/2 "R_ 1/2 R 3" 7,. �10.. HORIZONTAL LINE 2'- D. MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Title: Standard Plate Library Concrete Curb &Gutter for Streets City of Monticello Date: 03—os Plate No. Revised: 5005 03-15 Curb and Gutter No Scale CONCRETE CU AND GUTTER EXPANSION JOINTS 6' A . , CONCRETE TO BE - EXPANSION POURED INTEGRALLY JOINTS WITH CURB B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER i 7" MIN. WIDTH VARIES SECTION B—B PLAN 18" A EXPANSION JOINTS VARIABLE 1/4 PER SFT (C'� Standard Plate Library City of Monticello SION 3/4 . 7„ 5' MIN. 18" SECTION A—A Title: Commercial Driveway Entrance Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-1 5 5008 Commercial Driveway Enterance No Scale DRAWINGS BY LlIv Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan,specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Professi ngin r under t� laws of the St inn O Ran II C. He d MN. Lic. No. 19576 Date: ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Civil Construction Details SHEET NUMBER C7.2 Copyright Land &Resource Consulting z SMOOTH SLOPED MORTAR CAP PAINTED PT -9 SAFETY RED (2 COATS MiN -) 6" o STANDARD STL.PTPE FILLED 'METH CONCRETE AND PAINTED PT -I} SAFETY RED 12 COATS MIN-) 1 G_C_ TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION! OF EQUIPMENT PER THE MAIN STREET MENU SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS (A PRODUCT OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT HOWARD COMPANY. INC.) 10 lit" SPEAKER STAND 18" CONCRETE FOOTING MAGNETIC LOOP • CONCRETE (2) NO- 6 BARS 12" LONG EACH = 'L' -- WAY, WELD TO PIPE = < • I : f VERIFY FROST n. •q DEPTH PER LOCAL CODFJADJUST - - LOOP SUPPORT - ' 314" ION COMMUNICATION ICATIONI V-6" CONC. [SASE -1'-6'}S 1'-6" g,• 9„ CONDUIT X 1'�" FLUSH Wf TOP OF TO DRIVE THRU CONCRETE COMMUNICATION PANEL t'-6' Bollard Detail No Scale Speaker Post Detail No Scale 5'- 2" 1• fi" ... Yrs, 01 VERIFY FROST DEPTH PER LOCAL C ODEIADJ UST Drive Thru Menu Board No Scale FOR DUPLEX OPERATION IMPORTANT: AUDIO CABLE MUST BE SHIELDED, TWISTED PAIR AND THE CABLE FOR THE MICROPHONE MUST INA SEPARATE CABLE. IF THE MICROPHONE WHIN{G IS IN A CABLE WITH OTHER PAIRS {BEING USED ELECTRICALLY IN THE SYSTETv1}, COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS WILL OCCUR. KIICROPHONE:22 GA RED & BLACK 2 CONDUCTOR- AUDIO CABLE -OUTDOOR WIRE NOTE- SOLDER & INSULATE BOTH MAGNETIC LOOP CONNECTION — MAGNETIC LOOP - (COORDINATE REOTS WITH MFR AND .1J CONSTRUCTION} Detection / Speaker Isometric No Scale ICATED 3OLT ;AGE ] BY G -C. MENU BQARD- � _E FOOTING SEE 041AO03 3W' CONDUrL FOR POWER TO ELECTRICAL PANEL Drive Thru Equipment Plan No Scale MAGNETIC LOOP BELCL^J CONCRETE DRIVE - CUTi REPLACE PAVING AS REQUIRED. PIPE BOLLARD - SEE- 05/A.002 SPEAKER POST - SEE 0&(A003 3I4" >: ONDUIT FOR DATA TO COMMUNICATION PANEL PAINT CURB — GROUND WIRE (BLUE OR BLACK) SPEAKER: 22 GA WIRE, COLOR IS GREEN & WHITE 34" COMMUNICATION CONDUIT TO RUN TO DRIVE THTRU COMMUNICATION PANEL CUT CONDUIT 2" ABOVE CONCRETE FOR MIC ISPEAKER DRAWINGS BY L�\v Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision an m a duly Licensed Professi gin r under t� laws of the St inn 01O Ran II C. He d �� MN. Lic. No. 1957 Date: VO ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Civil Construction Details SHEET NUMBER C7.3 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting I (V N E 0 C N Li 1 FLOOR PLAN Al SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" TOP OF PARAPET EL. 120'-0" gb SCREEN WALL EL. 110 –0 FINISHED FLOOR EL. 100 –0 TOP OF FOOTING EL. 96 –8 PLAN NORTH co M r\r\r Ai+n r C' C' I Annrn TOP OF PARAPET EL. 118'-0" PRE–FINISHED METAL CANOPY ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAME FINISHED FLOOR EL. 100 –0 TOP OF FOOTING EL. 96'-8 TOP OF PARAPET EL. 120 –0 BOARD & BA ENGINEERED 1 SIDING FINISHED FLOOR EL. 100 –0 A$ TOP OF FOOTING EL. 96'-8" -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —IT L 4 NORTH ELEVATION Al SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" WOOD–LOOK FIBER PRE–FINISHED METAL CEMENT SIDING PANEL CAP FLASHING eco I I I I L� TI --- ------T1------- — — — — — — — �, L _L — — — — — — — — — -L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J 2 SOUTH ELEVATION Al SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" r3nr\r A n11r C' C' I A Mr\r 17 OOK FIBER SIDING PANEL I I F�------------ — ----------------------------- -1 L ------------------------- L--------------------------- J 3 EAST ELEVATION Al SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" TOP OF PARAPET EL. 118'-0" WOOD–LOOK I CEMENT SIDIN BOARD & BA' ENGINEERED SIDING OL FINISHED FLOOR EL. 100'-0" 1w1 1�gnN [fly&=TlNftrt BOARD & BATTEN ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING TOP OF PARAPET EL. 120'-0" SCREEN WALL EL. 110'-0" ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING MFR: LP SMARTSIDE STYLE: BOARD & BATTEN COLOR: ABYSS BLACK (OR SIMILAR) WOOD–LOOK FIBER CEMENT PANEL _ MFR: NICHIHA COLOR: VINTAGE WOOD 'CEDAR" (OR SIMILAR) ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES GLASS: TINTED INSULATED FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE PRE–FINISHED METAL COLOR: BLACK CHECK: 83 S.F. OF 3,930 S.F. TOTAL FACADE 83/3,610 = 2% < 15% MAXIMUM I I I II TOP OF FOOTING — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - F -J — — — — — — — — — — -L ——— — — — —LTLI EL. 96'-8" 5 WEST ELEVATION Al SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" F PARAPET I. 120'-0" >HED �NOPY L A M P E R T A R C H I T E C T S 420 Summit Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 i®i Phone:763.755.1211 Fox:763.757.2849 lam pert@lam pert—arch.com ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A I DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UND(3E LAWS OF THE S;�� E OTA, SI ATURE LEPE T PRINT 13669 ovizo (CLIC TE A, Z O O rM aM rM • MOM MMMM% L Revisions I V/ J/ Z J r- I\LLIIV11114 1\ I 10/13/23 O 11/29/23 Q) 12/1/23 CITY SUBMITTAL .V MOMO S L Copyright 2023 Leonard Lampert Architects Inc. Project Designer: L. SCHMIDT Drown By: LLS Checked By: LL Revisions I V/ J/ Z J r- I\LLIIV11114 1\ I 10/13/23 REVISED PRELIM. 11/29/23 COORDINATION 12/1/23 CITY SUBMITTAL FLOOR PLAN UILDING ELEVATIONS Sheet Number Al Project No. 230724-3 I 16'-0" 21'-0" I 13'-0" I � I I � � I � o I I � L--- M I � I 26'-0" I o I I I 00 I L O I RTU SETBACK DIAGRAM SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" SITE L1NE — CEDAR STREET � RTU SIGHTLINE DIAGAM SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" OF PARAPET _ 118'— 0 — — I DRIVE THRU LANE PROPERTY LINE RTU AREA TOP OF PARAPET — — — EL. 120'-0" , — RTU AREA SATE UNE ' ' D DD aL7 D DRIVE THRU LANE 1 OAKWOOD DRIVE EAST — DRIVE THRU LANE 2 RTU SIGHTLINE DIAGAM SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" E 0 C Q) LL PROPERTY LINE -- — — —— SITE LINE LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE L A M P E R T A R C H I T E C T S 420 Summit Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 101 Phone:763.755.1211 Fox:763.757.2849 lam pert®lam pert—arch.com ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A y DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDO E LAWS OF THE S;� E OTA, SI ATURE LE PIET PRINT � 13669 V (�LIC0 TE V) OVA 0 Copyright 2023 Leonard Lampert Architects Inc. Project Designer: L. SCHMIDT Drown By: LLS Checked By: LL Revisions ISCREENING DIAGRAM Sheet Number Project No. 230724-3 NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SIDING #1 NICHIHA VINTAGE WOOD 'CEDAR' (OR SIMILAR) SIDING #2 LP SMARTSIDE BOARD & BATTEN ABYSS BLACK (OR SIMILAR) PRE -FINISHED METAL FIRESTONE BLACK SOUTH ELEVATION FRAMES ANODIZED ALUMINUM DARK BRONZE JIMMY JOHNS Monticello, Minnesota WEST ELEVATION Ift 0 12/1/23 NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. ACTUAL COLORS NEED TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. J 0 J J W U z 0 V) z 0 r 7) 1-110 J J W U z 0 V) z 0 } iv E 0 0 Ll - GROUND COVER OR MULCH AS SPEC. TURN BACK BURLAP REMOVE POLY AND WIRE SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED GROUND BACKFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 13'-4" F 5" CONCRETE SLAB ON GRAD OVER COMPACTED CLASS 5 BASE I I I I I #4 VERT. BARS AT 32" O.C. DOWELSINTO FTG. L I` �\ v'CON CRE TE�� APRON TRASH SCALE: 1/4 El'AN"a,OWN ENCLOSURE = 1,-0„ 1.1 1 RETAIN TREES NATURAL FORM. REMOVE ONLY DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES DO NOT CUT LEADERS ROOT COLLAR 1-2" ABOVE GRADE WOOD CHIP MULCH REMOVE WIRE BASKETS AND POLY TIES. CUT BURLAP FROM UPPER 1/2 OF BALL EXISTING GRADE BACKFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL. WATER THOROUGHLY TO ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS BREAK DOWN SIDES OF HOLE UNDISTURBED SOIL BENEATH BALL HINGE BY GATE SUPPLIER. PROVIDE CONVEX NOTCH IN RING FOR POSITIVE STOP AT 105 DEGREES OPEN. PROVIDE ZERK FITTING FOR HINGE LUBRICATION VERTICAL COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING OVER TUBE STEEL DOOR FRAMES WITH COMPOSITE WOOD LATCH (2) 6'-0" WIDE x 5-6" HIGH I1'i I � I llll,� I � I J-7KJ �, FLUSH BOLTS —/ INTO CONC APRON 6"0 STEEL BOLLARD GROUTED SOLID FOR GATE MOUNTING ELEVATION 'A' PLANTING SCHEDULE QTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE MTHD REMARKS 6 AB AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER FREEMANII 2.5" CAL. BB 6 AL AMERICAN BLVD LINDEN TILIA AMRICANA 'BOULEVARD' 2.5" CAL. BB 30" CALIPER INCHES 4 BH BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA 8' TALL BB 8" CALIPER INCHES 14 RED TWIGGED DOGWOOD CORNUS BAILEYI 'CARDINAL' 3-4' TALL CONT. 14 COMPACT BURNING BUSH EUONYMUS ALATUS 'COMPACTA' 18"-24" TALL CONT. 14 GOLDMOUND SPIREA SPIREA X BUMALDA 'GOLDMOUND' 18"-24" TALL CONT. 41 SHRUBS LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. SEED/SOD AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 2. SEE PLAN FOR PLANTINGS LOCATED IN ROCK MULCH BED. ROCK MULCH BEDS SEPARATED FROM SOD BY BLACK VINYL EDGER. OTHER PLANTINGS TO HAVE WOOD MULCH RING TO PREVENT WEED GROWTH AND CONSERVE WATER. 3. UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE PROVIDED FOR ALL FOUNDATION PLANTINGS AND TURF AREAS. PROVIDE MOISTURE SENSOR. IRRIGATION DESIGN BY CONTRACTOR. 4. PLANTING REQUIREMENTS NOTE: GREATER NUMBER OF PLANTINGS TO BE USED TREE REQUIREMENT (SITE ACERAGE) 0.81 ACRES Q 10.0 ACI/ACRE = 8.2 CALIPER INCHES SHRUB REQUIREMENT (BLDG PERIMETER) 206 FEET @ 2 SHRUBS/10 FT = 41.2 SHRUBS PARKING PERIMETER REQUIREMENT 353 FEET @ 8.0 ACI/100 FEET = 28.2 CALIPER INCHES PARKING ISLAND REQUIREMENT 1 TREE/180 S.F. ISLAND 25% ISLAND TO BE SHRUB COVERED TOTAL REQUIRED PLANTINGS TREES = 36.4 CALIPER INCHES < 38 CALIPER INCHES PROVIDED SHRUBS = 41.2 SHRUBS < 42 SHRUBS PROVIDED METAL CAP FLASHING OVER TREATED PLATE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING OVER FURRING STRIPS TO MATCH BUILDING ON 8" CONC. BLOCK CONCRETE SLAB AND APRON 12"x20" CONC. FTG. W/(2) #5's CONT. SECTION 'B' LANDSCAPE SCALE: 1" = 20'-0 0 40 TRASH ENCLOSURE SEE 2/L1 PRS( PRN00, \pN CONS V) PAV ►7 Drown By: ALE Checked By: LL Revisions LANDSCAPE PLAN TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL Sheet Number Project No. 230724-3 o o p 0 N 0 Lu J N o O X Q > n 0] W 00 OM o 0 0 N N O2 O O O O N M M M d� � N N N Y N U mN C) 0 0 0 0 2 O N O 0_ N (r 0_ N O m T @ K Freestanding Pylon Sign � \ \\ —15' Sign Setback Drive Thru Sign (Approximate location) \ °\\ Sian Notes 1. Details of sign design to be provided at a later submittal. Design will conform to Monticello's sign regulations. 2. Sign Setback = 15' from property line Allowed Signs 1 Freestanding Sign Max Height: 22' Max Area: 100 sf each side 3 Additional Signs Max Height: 3' Max Area: 10 sf each, 30 sf for all three signs Proposed Signs 1 Freestanding Sign - North corner of site Max Height: 22' Max Area: 100 sf each side 3 Additional Signs -1 Drive Thru sign, 2 Wall signs Max Height: 3' Max Area: 10 sf each, 30 sf for all three signs PRE -FINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING WOOD -LOOK FIBER F= TOP OF PARAPET SIGNAGE CEMENT SIDING PANEL EL. 120--0" TOP OF PARAPET i EL. 118-0 i CEMENT SIDING PANEL \ PRE-FINISHED LILL] BOARD &BATTEN ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING METAL CANOPY `� - LIEL ANODIZED - ALUMINUM \\LIE\ FRAMES FINISHED FLOOR EL. 100 -0 I TOP OF FOOTING — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �— L. 96 -8 ------------------------------------------ I ————— — — — — I II li � Sian Notes 1. Details of sign design to be provided at a later submittal. Design will conform to Monticello's sign regulations. 2. Sign Setback = 15' from property line Allowed Signs 1 Freestanding Sign Max Height: 22' Max Area: 100 sf each side 3 Additional Signs Max Height: 3' Max Area: 10 sf each, 30 sf for all three signs Proposed Signs 1 Freestanding Sign - North corner of site Max Height: 22' Max Area: 100 sf each side 3 Additional Signs -1 Drive Thru sign, 2 Wall signs Max Height: 3' Max Area: 10 sf each, 30 sf for all three signs Wall Sign - West Elevation No Scale TOP OF PARAPET EL. 120 -0 ( SCREEN WALL EL. 110 -0 FINISHED FLOOR EL. 100 -0 10 I I TOP OF FOOTING I TI I _ _ _ _IT EL. L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wall Sign - East Elevation No Scale OOK FIBER SIDING PANEL 1 4 Know what's NOW. Call before you dig. DRAWINGS BY Jnr LI�v Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision anm a duly Licensed Professi engiine.,er under t laws of the St inn,O4N4 Ran II C. He d MN. Lic. No. 19576` VO Date: ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Sign Plan SHEET NUMBER C6.0 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting PRE -FINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING WOOD -LOOK FIBER F= TOP OF PARAPET SIGNAGE CEMENT SIDING PANEL EL. 120--0" TOP OF PARAPET EL. 118-0 WOOD -LOOK FIBER _- CEMENT SIDING PANEL \ PRE-FINISHED LILL] BOARD &BATTEN ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING METAL CANOPY `� - LIEL ANODIZED - ALUMINUM \\LIE\ FRAMES FINISHED FLOOR EL. 100 -0 I TOP OF FOOTING — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �— L. 96 -8 ------------------------------------------ I ————— — — — — I II li � Wall Sign - West Elevation No Scale TOP OF PARAPET EL. 120 -0 ( SCREEN WALL EL. 110 -0 FINISHED FLOOR EL. 100 -0 10 I I TOP OF FOOTING I TI I _ _ _ _IT EL. L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wall Sign - East Elevation No Scale OOK FIBER SIDING PANEL 1 4 Know what's NOW. Call before you dig. DRAWINGS BY Jnr LI�v Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763-340-0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification, or report was prepared by under my direct supervision anm a duly Licensed Professi engiine.,er under t laws of the St inn,O4N4 Ran II C. He d MN. Lic. No. 19576` VO Date: ISSUED FOR ISSUE / REVISION DATE Site Plan Application 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan Application SHEET TITLE Sign Plan SHEET NUMBER C6.0 Copyright Land & Resource Consulting Land & Resource L I \ v Consulting November 29, 2023 Stormwater Memo To: Angela Schumann From: Todd Olin, Land & Resource Consulting Re: Jimmy John's, Monticello — Stormwater Memo Dear Ms. Schumann, Jimmy John's, Monticello is a proposed commercial lot located on the south corner of Cedar St. and Oakwood Dr. in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. The proposed development has a disturbed area of 0.81 acres, 77% of which is impervious. The proposed storm sewer design for the project will collect and route 4.4 cfs (10 -yr event) into existing storm sewer. Half will route to the existing storm sewer in Oakwood Dr. while the rest will be directed into the existing storm sewer south of the site. The catch basin manholes onsite will contain 4' sumps to provide pretreatment. Refer to the Appendices for the Drainage Areas, and Storm Sewer Calculations. Sincerely, Land & Resource Consulting Inc. d Olin, President /', 14260 23rd Avenue N., Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Appendix A: Storm Sewer Drainage Areas 5572 I* -Mb ST 55 1 \CB s0 0 / 9 0 0 0 / � 260 ryM \ —K0 C 5010 5011 5013 A 0 end Drainage Boundary XXX Catch Basin N 0 50 100 DRAWINGS BY LAi-1V011 t Land & Resource Consulting 14260 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.340.0699 DRAWINGS FOR 688 Bryant, LLC 301 W. County Rd E2 New Brighton, MN 55112 Phone: 612-290-6266 PROJECT Jimmy John's Monticello, MN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this pla specification,or reportwas prepared by under my direct supervision an maduly Licensed Pmfessi in r under Ian of the 'nn O R.XIC. He d MN. Lie. No. /19574 Date: Deas O4 9073 ISSUED FOR ISSUE/REVISION DATE New Bldg Footpdnt-Adj. Site 11.22.2023 Submitted to City 12.04.2023 SUBMITTAL INFO Review By: Todd Olin Project # : 23010 Submittal Date: 12-04-2023 Submittal Phase: Site Plan SHEET TITLE Storm Sewer Drainage SHEET NUMBER cwyreht u,nd a Raw--ut,a Appendix B: Storm Sewer Design Calculations STORM SEWER DESIGN Land & Resource YConsultingL, LSD[ Dr ._iNEER1Kf- STORM EVENT: DATE: 09/12/23 PROJECT NAME: JJ's Monticello PROJECT NUMBER: 23010 PROJECT CITY: Monticello PROJECT COUNTY: jWright PROJECT ENGINEER: JRH Land & Resource YConsultingL, LSD[ Dr ._iNEER1Kf- STORM EVENT: 10 • •- DESIGNED BY: Time of •nc. JK REGION: Central • • .•- ' • •- Time of •nc. UpstreamDownstream 1 1 1 � 1 : 1 • 1 • � 1 1 ® .:. .:. ��0® ' 1 � 1 1 • . �® 1 •.1 : • � .• . � 1 1 •.1 ' ' � �- . 1 Prepared by Land Resource Consulting 11/29/2023 Page 1 to MonCITYticello December 13, 2023 Re: Jimmy Johns Baskin Robbins City Project # 2024-02 OFFICE: 763-295-2711 FAX: 763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street Suite 11 Monticello, MN 55362 The Engineering Department has reviewed the Civil Plans for the Jimmy Johns/Baskin Robbins site dated 12-4-2023 as prepared by LRC and offers the following comments: General Comments 1. Install 6' concrete sidewalk along Cedar Street. Also, recommend creating a sidewalk connection from the building to the public sidewalk. 2. Existing water service stub may be a 6", contractor will need to field verify. 3. The building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements when building plans are available. 4. The stormsewer connection to the south appears to cross adjacent property, provide easement for the connection. 5. If 1 acre or more is proposed to be disturbed a SWPPP will need to be created and implemented and NPDES construction stormwater permit will be required. 6. Streets, parking lots, and utilities shall be designed in accordance with the applicable City Subdivision Ordinances and the City's General Specifications and Standard Details Plates for Street and Utility Construction. The City is not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please contact the Engineering Department with any questions. Sincerely, Ryan Melhouse Project Engineer www.ci.monticello.mn.us Planning Commission Agenda - 01/02/2024 2B. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Request for an Amendment to the Country Club Manor 2nd Addition Planned Unit Development District, as related to principal residential use for development of 22 units of twinhomes; Request for Preliminary Plat of Country Club Manor 4th Addition. Applicant: Michael Hoagberg Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Community Development Director 01/02/2024 Commission action): 01/22/2024 Additional Analysis by: NA ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Amendment to the Country Club Manor 2nd Addition Planned Unit Development District, as related to principal residential use for development of 22 units of twinhomes; Request for Preliminary Plat of Country Club Manor 4th Addition 1. Motion to continue the public hearing and table action on the requests to February 6, 2024 regular meeting of the Planning Commission. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The applicant has requested tabling of action on the requests to the February meeting of the Commission. SUPPORTING DATA A. Request to Table 1 From: Michael Hoaabera To: Anaela Schumann Cc: Brian Nicholson: Liz Trautz Shirley: Michael I Gerber Subject: Planning Commission Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 11:54:37 AM Angela, Please consider this email our official request to table our application for the Phase II Twinhomes until the next meeting to be held the first Tuesday of February. We would like additional time to address updated design considerations prior to PC official review. Please let us know if you need anything further in the meantime. Regards, Michael Hoagberg Mariaghig Director Headwaters Development Planning Commission Agenda: 01/02/2024 2C. Public Hearing — Consideration to adopt Resolution PC -2024-02 recommending adoption of the 2024 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Community & Economic 01/02/2024 Commission action): Development Coordinator 01/22/2024 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt Resolution PC -2024-02 recommending the adoption of Ordinance No. 8XX for the 2024 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map, including Shoreland/MWSRR/Floodplain Overlay, The Pointes at Cedar District (PCD), and Central Community District (CCD) companion appendix maps, based on the findings in said resolution. 2. Motion of other. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Planning Commission is asked to review the proposed City of Monticello 2024 Official Zoning Map and consider recommending the map and companion appendix maps for adoption by the City Council. The Official Zoning Map included for review reflects rezoning actions which have occurred since the adoption of the last official map in January 2023. The map proposed includes one rezoning amendment adopted in 2022 as well as those that were adopted in 2023, as follows: • Ordinance No. 781— Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Planned Unit Development • Ordinance No. 799 — Section 19 of said Ordinance removed the "Performance Based Overlay District" from the Monticello Zoning Ordinance in its entirety. • Ordinance No. 803 — Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle (PID: 155038001050) from 1-1, Light Industrial to Industrial & Business Campus (IBC) District • Ordinance No. 816 — Great River Planned Unit Development In recommending adoption of the Official Zoning Map, the Planning Commission would also recommend adoption of the Shoreland/MWSRR/Floodplain Overlay District map, the CCD map, as well as the PCD map. Planning Commission Agenda: 01/02/2024 There are no changes to the Shoreland/MWSRR/Floodplain Overlay District map, nor were there any changes to the PCD map in 2023. The CCD map is proposed to be updated to eliminate the Performance Based Overlay District from both the areas on the map, as well as the legend, to reflect the adopted language in Ordinance No. 799. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the 2024 Official Zoning Map and companion appendix maps. The updated Official Zoning Map is reflective of the map amendment actions taken by the City over the prior year. The Shoreland/MWSRR/Floodplain and PCD maps are consistent with prior adoption and the CCD map reflects sub -districts for all areas of the CCD. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2024-02 B. Ordinance 8XX, Draft —Adoption of Official Zoning Map and Appendix Maps C. 2024 Proposed Official Zoning Map D. 2023 Current Official Zoning Map E. 2024 Proposed Central Community District Map F. 2023 Current Central Community District Map G. 2024 Pointes at Cedar District Map H. 2024 Shoreland — MWSRR — Floodplain Overlay District Map I. Ordinances for Rezoning, 2022 & 2023 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2024-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP IN ITS ENTIRETY WHEREAS, the Zoning Map of the City of Monticello requires amendment; and WHEREAS, the proposed map accommodates and furthers the intentions and policies of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning is consistent with the intent of the City's Comprehensive land use plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello finds that the proposed zoning map will be consistent with the intent of the proposed zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on January 2nd, 2024 to review the requests and receive public comment on the zoning map amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed zoning map has met the requirements for adoption as found in the zoning ordinance and state law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the zoning map amendment to be identified as Ordinance No. 8XX. ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ILIs] ►11[4:111x811W_1►1011010416luILTII WINI01 In ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director ORDINANCE NO. 8XX_ CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND ADOPTING THE 2024 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND APPENDIX MAPS FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The zoning map amendments attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" are adopted as the Official Zoning Map under Title XV, Chapter 153, Section 153.040 of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Monticello. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall upon request. ADOPTED AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION BY the Monticello City Council this day of January, 2024 CITY OF MONTICELLO Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ORDINANCE NO. 8XX_ EXHIBIT "A" Following are the approved amendments to the Official Zoning Map and its Appendix Maps Ordinance No. 781— Lots 1-26, Block 1; Lots 1-20, Block 2; Lots 1-13, Block 3, Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Ordinance No. 799 — Removal of the "Performance Based Overlay District" in its entirety Ordinance No. 803 — Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Park Ordinance No. 816 — Lot 1, Block 1, Great River 2nd Addition 11 I • ♦ ` City of Monticello 0 v t CCD Sub-District 0 , ., \ o. Z w er S� W E �. CO. away St der Q�c� S a ` Rive t River '` .yoQ 1 inch 550 feet K- y 3ra IK Golf Course Rd j `` �\ ' NAo Broadway cn �♦ b St �Q Walnut /Cedar oaa�aySt / General CCD General CCD Fero ym Walnut w a a� ayst S & Cedar Walnut w �o Cedar St St /yy4? raStF s'`� / v�a� xoff �1 y / Pine F / 1 Street Fy cw 1 1 rz �o General CCD 1 � AO CCD Sub-Districts Riverfront \ Broadway Walnut & Cedar \ General CCD — MN Wild and Scenic _ _ _ River Districts Pine Street �' �� _. Freeway OverlayagQ,ber District gRa y o m Date: 12/18/2023 LEGEND: -- � RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL � ,�/ i i I lipI n Q� MIXED USE Q PCD SUB-DISTRICT NORTHERN BIOME: POPULUS / PCD SUB-DISTRICT CENTRAL BIOME: TILIA PCD SUB-DISTRICT i EXISTING Z SOUTHERN BIOME: QUERCUS j 2 H Ln X } LU ® E TI ♦ — -- MAJOR -� SECONDARY GATEWAY #2 GATEWAY NORTHERN BIOME: POPULUS MAJOR GATEWAY#1 - - I« SECONDARY GATEWAY EXISTING VA 4 / a� CENTRAL TILIA MAJOR -- / GATEWAY #4 / PARKJO GATEWAY #3 SOUTHERN BIOME: QUERCUS El I I _ �F XISTIN - - A E 4 \\\ s SECONDARY GATEWAY O E O E SECONDARY GATEWAY I� The Pointes at Cedar District s Monticello, MN j j\ o I50' 100• 200• \ ^ �CJ VV I� x March 28, 2022 1 WSB #:019376-000 Scale in Feet H � may-+ + a°a '% j'4�►� � , ., A� ^� �I_ } , x�.-�+; .� i�'•�i's'�'� .., �/ Floodplain,horeland and MWSRR OveS ! � ,� �. • .� `ai. 'Y:' -r' x'4, tee., x. '4 �t �S ,..It � t �{�+ � •t4 ` \ t \ �• .), - T r , 3 3t'• � cY a m `hr_Nn"• a � 1 ffimkl� L - - ._ l•ST + -�.r .k. ` 9'l .2t;r71 II , St Ne 7-- N, N � •� ,C;i ., 4 .��>a, i w �'�—�'-.,�i-i f:I�?1,:�."1i - v - / ./� / -,.-eA_ .. ? tee�++� 4�- 1, -- - -�� .. � f ',,I' , 4 �� 4 I�IIIII�I�i�I IIIS ll,pll l. lll'I�il��d ! llp IlIi1'LIl11I ,l I11111l;' ,: a.. �•,�_ __ +•�'�.I \�,. �. ��. ,. s°zf •S } �'� '✓ • °•- 9 -,•,� '�'.:,. / ,i:,. !IL 1,4 1 �. .. .� �, / � ``•.-r `ai;.,;.. � ` ;' •s_.: ' 1 F r , S�+�a `'� III II I - - - -. .;�-.,:_,r� .g;- ,ga.- - I\\ /- ® :)'. � !` \� ��i � :rte -:i :.,•}rd$a^"'..',� � �• � -_- . 0 n I 01 - �,, 1®� Nle .• ,� -- \ '�" �\ 11: L _ x - ' I po \ f� PRO 'a� " -ate•. ,. .,: -_- , ' :. .-,.;.• �.y- \\ .\ l 7--��- ��".`r+ ��\ . )f t IIY ."'3 l^__'��.Y:� r . ro i'.- r+"ia � `.Fr ,�\\a ��q�y� ` � ��'yt.,�� . \�\\\ � *-�� ` ,tr •,f` �� . , A,i 20th- .vYe. �v +s: . :��' '� S� �':�s--' >,,`, a°`"ar st-,. �,yc> ® Yis .er, r •_ _ P S,,. ;:+,� "fit ',:'"� . ;: n..:.:4 `\ �. ��+^ \\ •�"�-~' - �t1�•1�� IN Cameron Ave Ne �•- R- • . 7 Iver. M \ 000 - •... - ,,`. '?i4 L . 1100 \�' .r�Or�a� min�. P✓""ly � � ��H.illcrest,23 , ' a ��Luaa�.t�O ✓},� �6� :"s� : � u \� \ _ 4 - �~ I � y :ae��,a�®6�!�f(^'kia®F � ��!11t��'f9� \ � � •.M ��r wM.a'0 �k�rai i��►ly�p.. ;s . . •' - T' i �faTJ I e:Rd i q,L: a" °(#,'� 2w 1 , �' Ali ' ' yd„®B� a'ii,8!� Mall NSA „,, 33. frZ��A� wr y�t.;® �1�•bC JAVA \\\ �• +� °�. i”' i I1 g'i sisC'!�`j�"Y�3��.��'��Cl;�'�x .. - NZ :,, ,- V rad: �..:.,.... �a=.,. ., rt..D .�, :.. ° :A '�. - >.. 'y. • �: INkn,.I � � Ma , w��l � 1f �ry Llefe,l n' b � ,. /i i , ` �qUn ..- I".fi, a,�`` 7'niQIL, `�. .J,G �ya�`� ii1 • t I�:r tel; a '�.+y��" iCl�'"�TWO\�� /,I - A ��► v Ana . ✓I'4+ so <n A r � a► a"IN�{li 7• yi-qy� .`_ y \ \ :,y' - =w. a : -.:.. . ;.. � �� _ a� -�\ \.'. -te .7 k h .� ,. ,��- r?Jur. seq. ✓. `. \\ \ - -�64� ,t�-;�` i 'R i !� �_:�� +� . i. •^4 a9 \�n "�®fir° _.�'9s , •, , i P, ,N I` , i;, ;„sT +.,• ene \� SFN �. '_. __..._ _-'-__ __ _.-_.. =., _ } :., . .- .•, � - �< "sr•, -Kam a-rC. l�C9t+ _fai.S^•�`.\`.°) L°Twi x” .. _ r _. _ e,.l �- _. _\----Cou S - - -- ----- _ - `.. g .•i• .`_, ! U.. j r I-. � '437�y�w.•��. -may �9 iy� ,gg ... -.. .a- _ �� u � J ��3'9n�a' y m. �y�1� tE® �' d4 ' E9 e - .,` � �/, }• S� ayf` T`: �ll � 7:- y1, \\ \. ! ':�7' �_ f! I• -_�.-_51 �_,��r �. .I". I -�-� , � +SI 1 � . R iiKS� i[?'�J�i Ir:•. W.�II`iA )li ,. �� /,�q'�. -.I�� iii k' vr� r I V I .I f Ne 4 o2cayt etha 114 y I k Irl e x+l. N Floodway W E Flood Fringe s 500 -Year Floodplain DNR Protected Waters ® Wild and Scenic Boundary Shoreland Overlay District DNR Watercourse City Boundary ---I M OAA L Vinc Date: yam. m 1.c St Ne r a a e m. y J Qgi f lil:-1 (t-::�A,#'r,",)!/eA �elr/•�a7�!r \. r.' ♦`f�A .^,4;�Y.�'.mc��-et�r-�a • {u��EI.fyr�'od.=a�`�RSy\i®:J . / rV 'ry�Late�- aA�2irs<c '�,e S�e/stctia'4�rfI�ybc_�'�L.,i�eaoT.1a1p�am�qaiq�� n';.t� �j�A' / A�:q.iy�'hrrw,a`�,.'-s'!�'"a:@(.+f. r¢ �`. +�. . 7d ,09t�-.«.,-,�,. i�-:_. 7, m r�J.,►V �,a� .y', . �' Y''.'<ma"'r. '�-.:..zs/J��4��:„,.'a.�,�FY,�_._,;/4'7 . y�/ .�Q�ti+�o•.:w'y.yr.y�t ��'ai sr,w/ryI''O`, q,1-;' 0Js'1 h j<N'i.s�';�.,.�. WKS- N-4y'�aR..•ar,J. �\ \\\ \\ w '•Vv A � . / •+,M 02, NE.�so�p I : L O� .f J 'r h a it t I � � r a a F ?• 6 � 0 a r:� C h t t � -�,- I s _ I I 1 a �\ �.�. n 5 9 194 - 4 S -- T I T /. Inte rito / / r I / d' Ch. illi R' Oav Se Roe ate a Pine St To Eb 794 St yP• -r `\ \�� , !9 a m. cv f' ✓ � 5s ` s o a1 �\ . - •�� .®°�o�tl- . i�� }- y.o •• t.1$�.-5 ' o oWesa� ...- +�:�: / S' RIiF?a '-.i.:0�/S•OP.-44r'.,. _x ':_: i`� m F - ..-�_ i ,.i - 7th JTm _ .. . ►c St F 99th 493Ull - 't, O r E d Ct7e I fi I / a / aa'I .,moi.. t��a7• 3.7 <. -. 5 , .a , F iiChelsea Rd,., .` - .- r. a 0". .: .1•';s. .., C>! :.it v a = - ': .. .., .�A i � Sa nnah Ave rl re M 1Qbrl.-MIIIiC,t.N�-..9�riA !,t go •n' -i' / . ��•. �e+� RI�. . 2 s hat .r(, 1 eraM,•t. '9 iR:.a: r ti ?., y�yi ii(Je a N: i , r. m r . �� '� a�l}� - r,., C•.-. � �� -- i ':I r4 Ne m " y . ^R�_. sail li e a m• ._ �y >' etao �Mi`Pr� ... Y 'a� r t, 3 h• '��M-. ,.7y' ••.., a +'' �.. - ♦.!/.Ru n -R.. oo`�.,:3� _ , 4. tl Oi : a -- c \ .. r y ° Aia�y�i� a�i,g ��y'f'sr � % f.,: _ ,� '.. .: ,: µtr _ b6I 9M `�\ �F •ttT' r { a h RlvOet'rtrsR "'4 •i' `�o ti .8'�,.AC•'.N'' /' 4i ,�r : A�q _ 'f... Fe ~ � O1,, [arr.'XF�il! ►�• I 3 :�d/��"®�•� R•./`.•� �{ :�,..JkA �I.. I" (y' f nrny.tAV.e �r 6 -\\- \'• tk ,_'1 ®"�� t �. I ��wa�#��r�ir. Si�',A I� o I I ✓y -� :\ ml�i o '�`• -� I a�aA, `rtl�t 4 � -e"Dun��AIs. 2 O.. �O'e .`� " q ;. �r• ,. ! ✓3' >E � � i> - -�� - f � � -��• ennrng A e Ne inters ,.. �� tat 9 i✓a.y wa d�' ,,(+y �° -\�� I NM ? _. I 1 �Redf� ��> �•`� -... - - . - _ •-' ... -� ;: .�aaRriY�.e.rr�s..r e %,rr�0` 4 - I r---- t o uem t,le s oczY= I .. I I ..: I . --_ .: ' y ., rn; mss, �� tlr' � I .` I •' 6 v No ... ' - , �m i,:0 � -•'m. ;gc� �g1 ® �oa� fr ' m'-.�® lYb.a'.d 1 f }R -'.od�Ciri..: e y 0 �.-'. �. ,:_._ -+ �� :v-: School BIVd t ..' - - v•I- o "'- m Eir• • r d � K�L n Nie t � ■■p lA.■ y— . d - ,. // .. / ? . aY'n; ',, • r r s. ' a . -- + �I . ' . , ....e„_. � 1 ^ .}�qm a i��l��' � • o:M �®B P�®4'10© k� �a 'i �`Ifr■ �I.Y".®O �IOI,e„r . A• { ��"� r aw,.. _' d r✓'?m�:� ° i^Pe bble'b rooK�a3 _ f ��4i. 3, #�_r� ,_c�sl 1891 �®1:^l� < , 1�tS e aGiQ �:� _---_-_- / i ., � '_:. . „ ,< -_. I' ,� ,,.. �4- iTe 1 ?" � Ma'tH n'Di• �alma�ifr�. Imo. �,. -.;. 3. ��.,•.�� t ,•� Est :1:C'1:71ifYTgrd Z`'.=.1r•:.f'altc,oan,,�Aw:eI.,✓r'.srarwiy=_d �9 a�jr a,VeO •V®® I��@� qo®��I I w est ® r,r,`� -tom , I ".rfrttls� r5'.'�rir1`jG�iIYeLi9a °, °:�•i+�i: MNs �J - - ,_._ \ o i �+ ` S . CD tt"f trti6 ooC' }A� _moi nyga';if�l�1!�r9� #Qs�1� r 4sOty s raI lu" ' y\0� � o . „ �®�7r��®iii .t m �...�.�r° r1-s}.� er �' iI i, Spar.F � I � � Me'a,d owr■l• Q' 90 a.«7ml®if v�rv�•� � �i{��t►�� I o� . •. �« t \jib PAIN NA.d.�, p ar mow;®ca¢nie 1" ae ,Rwloa.+ r� ra a p/e ri i�n^ I 1_ FalloA :tr',Cw•W ( +9kIE RA1m0`l �{• �Aai� v. 4' �� \ �. ,.4- rtl �lr ; ny��c, st. -ty�� •rte, � �� o��rn Al x}yR8,y78thaSt Ne _ r a � � th ,' r Psa �/ ® � I�•�-1 ( 'iC/�'. ) t T"a Ne '._.�e'�'.�p®�I■�I`\ weea `i O _Ne '� J'% a 511:, ( '•r i t V 'i to i li MS, 1:.; :, a.,lyl 3 87th St Nem r- o I�yL.IS (It'If( ,l:i i�:7.3:'�.�.?''y'_ y s,.�`•, _ C . hM, .ifani' t cyyp ��, I w 1> Milk - 4, I ' I 07 r / ✓x �m N 3 r e 9 - --- _--- — - - -oo el 10 - «r r - - -- - r � r `111p '_ _ � 10 ORDINANCE NO. 781 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE HAVEN RIDGE PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO PUD, HAVEN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT: HAVEN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0 HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: (_xx_) Haven Ridge 2nd Addition PUD District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Haven Ridge 2nd Addition PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for single family residential land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Haven Ridge 2nd Addition PUD District shall be single family residential uses as found in the R-1, Single Family Residential District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2022, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to single family residential uses, as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Haven Ridge 2nd Addition PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. Specific to the single family dwellings in the District, the following requirements shall apply: ORDINANCE NO. 781 1. Adherence to the City's T -N, Traditional Neighborhood zoning lot standards and setbacks, in the absence of a PUD design element addressing the other items in this list. Those standards include the following: 2. 25 foot front setbacks, with 6 feet side yards and 20 feet rear yards. 3. Building sizes of 1,050 finished, and 2,000 square feet finishable area. 4. Garage square footage of at least 480 square feet 5. Roof pitches of at least 5:12. 6. Brick/Stone on front fagade equal to at least 15% of all front - facing surfaces. 7. Livable portions of the home exposed to the front street will achieve between 40-50% of the width of the structure, with designs to be approved through the PUD process. 8. Usable front porches or similar features. 9. Front entry doors no greater than 6 feet farther back from the garage doors. 10. Additional large tree planting (including trees of at least 3" caliper planting size) in the front yards of the proposed lots to make a more immediate impact on the streetscape. 11. Driveway standards per the R-1 District. (e) In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the R-1, Single Family Residential District shall apply. (f) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (P)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from R-1, Single Family Residential District to PUD, Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Planned Unit Development District: Haven Ridge 2nd Addition 2 ORDINANCE NO. 781 Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 251h day of July, 2022 Lloyd Hilgart, M ,or ATTEST: raG (/r ennifer Schreiber, City Clerk AYES: Davidson, Fair, Gabler, Hilgart, and Murdoff NAYS: None. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 799 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE XV, CHAPTER 153, MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, VARIOUS SECTIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. § 153.010 RULES OF MEASUREMENT is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) Lots. (1) Definitions/measurement. (c) Lot area (see Figure 8-7�). The amount of land area, measured horizontally, included within the lines of a lot. Lands located within any private easements shall be included within the lot area. Public rights-of- way and areas below the ordinary high-water (OHW) mark for water features are not to be included in calculating lot area, except where specifically allowed by this chapter. The terms "lot size" and "lot area" shall be interchangeable. (d) Lot coverage (see Figure 8--Fo. Lot coverage shall be calculated as the total horizontal surface area of impervious surface on a given lot. SECTION 2. § 153.012 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended to read as follows: SIGN, HEIGHT OF. The height of the sign shall be computed as the vertical distance measured from the mean ground level on which the sign is placed to the top of the highest attached component of the sign. SECTION 3. § 153.026 SUMMARY OF DECISION-MAKING AND REVIEW BODIES, Table 2-1: Summary of the Roles of Decision -Making Bodies is hereby amended to read as follows: TABLE 2-1: SUMMARY OF THE ROLES OF DECISION-MAKING BODIES H = Hearing (Public Hearing Required) A = Appeal D = Decision (Responsible for Final Decision) R = Recommendation (Responsible for Review and a Recommendation) * = Will take action only if requestedFequiFed for a specific application or circumstance Procedure Subsection Community Development Department IEDC & EDA 1 Park & Recreation Commission Planning Commission City Council Board of Adjustment &Appeals Comp Plan Amendment 2.4 AR * H- R D Zoning Map/Text Amendment 2A0 R * H- R D Variance L4(C) R A H- D Conditional Use Permit 2.4D R * H- R D Interim Use Permit 2.4E R * H - R D Site Plan Review 2.4 UF D * CCD Only * A Joint Concept Review * CCD & PCD Only * CCD & PCD Only D 4 Administrative Appeal 2,4(H) R A D Building Permits 2.4I D A Certificates of Occupancy L4fh D A Sign Permit 2.4K D A Temporary Use Permit 2.4 UL D A Home Occupation Permit 2,A(M) D/R H- CUP D -CUP A Grading Permit 2.4 D A Driveway Permit L4(0) D A Planned Unit Development 2A0 R * * H - R D Subdivisions Qi1y Code R * R H- R D A [1]: Industrial & Economic Development Committee IEDC and the Economic Development Authority EDA SECTION 4. § 153.026 SUMMARY OF DECISION-MAKING AND REVIEW BOARDS is hereby amended to read as follows: (D) Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission. (1) Establishment, membership, rules and procedures. The establishment, membership, rules and procedures for the Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission are established in §§ 32.045 through 32.054. (2) Powers and duties. In addition to any other authority granted to the Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission by the City Code, the Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission shall have the responsibility to review and make recommendations on park needs generated by new development. PA "' Board of Adjustment and Appeals. (5) Powers and duties. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall have the following powers and duties related to this chapter: (a) To consider,- hear, review and make decision on applications for variances; and (H) Community Development Department. (2) Powers and duties. In addition to the jurisdiction, authority, and duties that may be conferred upon the Community Development Department by other provisions of this ordinance or the City Code, the Community Development Department shall have the following jurisdiction, powers, and duties under this chapter: SECTION 5. § 153.027 COMMON REVIEW PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) Authority to file applications. (1) Unless otherwise specified in this chapter, applications may be initiated by: (c) The city.., including the Community Development Department as authorized by this ordinance. (J) Continuation of public hearings. A public hearing for which proper notice was given may be continued during the course of such hearing to a later date without again complying with the written and publication notice requirements of this chapter, provided that the continuance date is announced at the meeting. SECTION 6. § Section 153.028 SPECIFIC REVIEW PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS is hereby amended to read as follows: (A) Comprehensive Plan amendments. (2) Initiation of proceedings. Proceedings for the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan shall be initiated by one of the following: (c) Recommendation of the Community Development Department, or (e d) Action of the City Council. (C) Variances. (3) Application. (b) In addition to the common review requirements, applications for a variance shall also include the following: 2. A site plan of the property showing all information necessary to allow the ci to determine conformance with all zoning provisions, and to calculate the specific variance being requested. Information shall include but not be limited to: 3. If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a certificate of survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to a site plan. The certificate ofsurvey must detail the information listed in V53.028(C)(3)0)(2) above. (D) Conditional use permits. (3) Application. (b) In addition to general review requirements, applications for a conditional use permit shall also include the following: 3. Development plans for the proposed use showing all information deemed necessary by the Community Development Department to ensure that the city can determine whether the proposed use will conform to all City Code standards. Such information may include, but shall not be limited to, the following: b. Location and building setbacks per this ordinance of all existing and proposed buildings and the size of each (including square footage); c. Curb cuts, driveways, access roads, parking spaces, off- street loading areas, and sidewalks;,—including dimension of each; i. Proposed outdoor storage spaces, including dimensions and detail of all intended storage types (if applicable); 4. If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a certificate of survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to or in lieu of a site plan. The certificate of survey shall detail the following information: i. All existing and proposed structures ii. Si nend by a registered land surveyor iii. Current (within last 6 months iv. Topographic survey and contours of all surface features including drainage ways, wetlands, etc. v. Public utilities including pipe size, material type, depths vi. Private utilities vii. Leal description viii. Easements of record 2 5. Color profile elevation drawings of all sides of new structures to illustrate the proposed visual appearance of new construction. Any landscaping shown on elevations must be shown as it appears in size and height at the time ofplanting. The elevations shall indicate the visual location and size of all exterior utility and mechanical systems, including HVAC, meters, and powerlines. 6. Any other information that may be reasonably required by the city to evaluate the application. (E) Interim use permits. (3) Application. (b) In addition to general review requirements, applications for an interim use permit shall also include the following: 3. Development plans for the proposed use showing all information deemed necessary by the Community Development Department to ensure that the city can determine whether the proposed use will conform to all City Code standards. Such information may include, but shall not be limited to, the following: b. Location and buildings setbacks per this ordinance of all buildings and the size of each, including square footage; c. Curb cuts, driveways, access roads, parking spaces, off- street loading areas, and sidewalks, including dimensions of each; i. Proposed outdoor storage spaces, including dimensions and detail of all intended storage types (if applicable); 4. If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a certificate of survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to or in lieu of a site plan. (F) Site plan submittals. (1) Purpose and scope. The City Council declares it necessary and appropriate to require site plan review of development in certain zoning districts to preserve and promote attractive, well-planned, stable urban conditions, and to review compliance with the requirements of this ordinance. Site plan approval by the Community Development Department must be obtained before a building permit is issued in order to ensure the following: (5) Submittal. (b) In addition to the common application requirements of § 153.028(F)(5)(a) above, submittals for site plan review shall also include at least the following to be considered complete (except as exempted by 5 the Community Development Department). All documents shall be prepared by a registered land surveyor, registered professional engineer, or other qualified professional as directed by the Community Development Department. 16. Building elevations (colored renderings) for all sides of the proposed buildings which detail the materials being used;—.Any landscaping shown on elevations must be shown as it appears in size and height at the time of planting. The elevations shall indicate the visual location and size of all exterior utility and mechanical systems, including HVAC, meters, and powerlines; 21. Any other information that may be reasonably required by the city to evaluate the application including but not limited to trafj- is analysis, floor plans, building elevations, rendered drawings, and materials samples. (6) Review. (a) Site plan review criteria. Recommendations and decisions on a site plan shall be based on consideration of the following criteria: 3. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with other city approved planning documents (e.g. r,,,w,,*,,w n evil ,',.,boon Viand (8) Time limit. (a) Unless otherwise specified in the site plan approval, an application for a building permit shall be applied for must reeeive approval within one year of the date of the site plan approval, otherwise the site plan shall become invalid. Permitted timeframes do not change with successive owners. (b) Upon written request, one extension of six monthsone year -may be granted by the Community Development Department if the applicant can show good cause. (10) Appeal. The applicant for a site plan review may appeal the decision of the Community Development Department to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals per § 153.028(1€lEG). (J) Sign permits. (3) Application. (b) In addition to general review requirements, applications for a sign permit shall also include at least the following to be considered complete (except as exempted by the Community Development Department): 11. If the proposed sign is a sandwich board sign to be located in the CCD District within the public right of way, the owner of the sign shall provide a certificate of general liability insurance with minimum coverage of $300,000 naming the city as an additional Co insured for the sign to be located upon the public right-of-way within the CCD, Central Community District. 12. If illuminated, a light distribution plan or other information demonstrating ompliance with the li h�tingrequirements of this ordinance_ 13. Other information to demonstrate compliance with this and all other ordinances of the city. (K) Temporary use permits. (6) Effect of a temporary use permit approval. (b) n minimumof 90 Days shall be r-equir-ed between the o -ati ,,, of temporary use ro,.mit an he 4 Issuance of another temporary use permit on the same site for an identical or similar use as determined by the Community Development Department shall be per the requirements of this ordinance. (L) Administrative home occupation permits. (3) Application. (b) In addition to general review requirements, applications for an administrative home occupation permit shall also include at least the following to be considered complete (except as exempted by the Community Development Department): 1. A narrative regarding the home occupation which addresses the following issues: b. All activities will be proposed to occurfing in conjunction with the home based occupation (i.e. office work, customer visits, sales, stock storage, etc); (N) Driveway permits. (4) Application. (b) In addition to general review requirements, applications for a driveway permit shall also include at least the following to be considered complete (except as exempted by the Community Development Department): 2. A site plan (or certified site survey if required by the Community Development Department) at a scale and in quantities deemed necessary by the Community Development Department showing: d. Location of the existing driveway (if applicable), the proposed driveway and the square footage and dimension of each; e. Driveway material; 7 ef. Location of existing public sidewalks and trails; fg. Calculation of the existing and proposed impervious surface coverage on the lot; gh. Identify existing and proposed curb types specifically calling out proposed changes to existing facilities. (0) Planned unit developments. (8) Areas of flexibility. (b) The city may consider flexibility with regard to land uses, setbacks, lot size, width, and depth, specific finishing standards of this ordinance, and access to public streets, among other zoning and subdivision standards when reviewing a PUD rezoning request. Specifications and standards for lots shall be at the discretion of City Council, and shall encourage a desirable living or working environment which assists in achieving the goals set out for PVDs. (9) PUD procedure. All requests for rezoning to planned unit development shall follow the steps outlined below. (b) PUD development stage, preliminary plat, and rezoning. 1. Initiation of proceedings. Requests for PUD development stage, rezoning to PUD and preliminary plat shall be initiated by application of the property owner or other person having authority to file an application pursuant to § 153.027(B), Authority to File Applications. The development stage PUD request shall be subject to timelines set by M.S. § 15.99, as it may be amended from time to time. If the applicant has processed an optional concept proposal review pursuant to § 153.028(D)(9)(a), the development stage application shall be submitted within six months of such review. If more than six months have elapsed since the concept review, the applicanttion must be pr-eeessed as may submit a new concept proposal unless the Community Development Department determines to waive this provision. 2. Application. d. If the PUD is proposed to develop over a timeframe exceeding two years, a PUD phasing plan for the entire project (to be completed in phases) may shall be submitted. Subsequent PUD Final plan applications would only grant approval for an individual phase. 3. Specific PUD development stage, preliminary plat and rezoning submittal requirements. An applicant shall provide a separate PUD development stage plan clearly delineating the proposed development and all features not consistent with underlying zoning regulations (e.g. setback deviations). At a minimum, the plan should show: p. Colored building elevations for all buildingsides ides which detail the materials being used. Any landscaping shown on elevations must be shown as it appears in size and height at the time Of planting. The elevations shall indicate the visual location and size of all exterior utility and mechanical systems, including HVAC, meters, and powerlines; (c) PUD final stage and final plat. 1. Initiation of proceedings. a. A final stage PUD plan and final plat that conforms with the approved Development stage PUD and preliminary plat and associated PUD rezoning ordinance shall be submitted no later than 60 days following the development stage PUD approval for review within the time allotted by M.S. § 15.99, as it may be amended from time to time. Applicants may request an extension from the Community Development Department for such submittal for a maximum of an additional six months), and shall request waivers for any statutory time limits as necessary. Applications which fail to meet this deadline shall be deemed void and shall require review and re-application according to the development stage PUD process of this chapter. 3. Specific PUD final stage and final plat submittal requirements. g. Developer shall provide all easement dedication documents for easements not shown on the final plat including those for trails, ingress/egress, etc., together with all necessary consents to the easement by existing encumbrancers of the property. h. Association declarations and/or other private covenant documents or easements necessary to implement and maintain the PUD as approved by the city. (10) PUD amendments. Approved PUDs may be amended from time to time as a result of unforeseen circumstances, overlooked opportunities, or requests from a developer. At such a time, the applicant shall make an application to the city for a PUD amendment. All such amendments will be processed as one of the following: (c) PUD amendment. Any change not qualifying for an administrative amendment or a PUD adjustment shall require a PUD amendment. An application to amend a PUD shall be administered in the same manner as that required for an initial P! beginni at PUD development stage and preliminary plat. 9 SECTION 7. § 153.028 SPECIFIC REVIEW PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS, Division (P) Specific PUDs is hereby amended to strike the following subsections in their entirety, with subsections (1) Twin Pines PUD District, and (3) Country Club Manor Second Addition PUD District in their full entirety hereby added to § 153.047, renumbering the subsections accordingly. (1) Twin Pines PUD District (2) Haven Ridge 2nd Addition PUD District (3) Country Club Manor Second Addition PUD District. SECTION 8. § 153.041 DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED, Table 3-2 Overlay Zoning Districts is hereby amended as follows: TABLE 3-2: OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS Abbreviation District Name FP Flood Plain District W Wetland District WS Wild and Scenic Recreational River District SH Shoreland District FBS Freeway Bonus Sign District DW Drinking Water Supply Management Area District SU Special Use Overlay District SECTION 9. § Section 153.041 DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED is hereby amended as to read as follows: (D) Organization of base zoning district regulations. Section 153.042 establishes the general purposes of each base zoning district along with the physical standards governing lots and structures within each district. Each of these divisions has a common structure consisting of a purpose statement, applicable size and dimensional standards for lots, an example of the typical lot configuration found in the district, and a hypothetical graphic depicting the districts physical regulations. Uses allowed in each district can be found in §§ 153.090 through 153.093. Finishing standards for lots (i.e. landscaping standards, parking requirements, etc) can be found in §§ 153.060 through 153.072. (E) Diagrams and photographs for illustrative purposes only. The building fe photographs-, example lot configurations, and hypothetical graphics of physical regulations are for illustrative purposes only, and may not be consistent with all listed requirements. In all cases, the dimensional requirement text of this chapter shall control. 10 SECTION 10. § 153.042 COMMON DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS is hereby amended to read as follows: (A) Building within public easements prohibited. No building or structure shall be placed within an easement dedicated for a public purpose unless expressly authorized by a variance issued in accordance with § 153.028(C) or a license or encroachment agreement issued by the Community Development Department. (D) Common yard and height requirements. (1) In general. (a) Unless otherwise authorized by variance, ad istr- tive adjustment or PUD, no lot, yard, or other open space shall be reduced in area or dimension so as to make such lot, yard, or open space less than the minimum required by this chapter; and if the existing yard or other open space as existing is less than the minimum required, it shall not be further reduced. (2) Allowable yard encroachments. (a) The following features may encroach into required yards: 1. Fences and walls that meet the standards in § 153.062, may encroach into a required yard, but shall be subject to corner visibility requirements, and shall not be placed within public rights of way, conservation easements unless specifically permitted by the easement. 3. In rear and side yards: recreational and laundry drying equipment, arbors and trellises, balconies, decks, and air conditioning subject to the following conditions: c. A setback of 20 feet shall be maintained from property lines abutting public streets rightsof way. 4. Appurtenances: a. Appurtenances are permitted to encroach into a required front or rear yard setback up to six feet. es not apply to rear -leading nits in thezoning distr4et. b. Appurtenances are permitted to encroach into a required side yard setback up to three feet. This " „ does not SECTION 11. § 153.043 RESIDENTIAL BASE ZONING DISTRICTS is hereby amended to strike all photographs showing typical district building forms in sections (C) — (J). 11 SECTION 12. § 153.043 RESIDENTIAL BASE ZONING DISTRICTS is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) Standards applicable to all residential base zoning districts. (C) Agricultural Open Space District (A -O). The purpose of the "A -O" aAgricultural- o0ven sSpace dDistrict is to provide suitable areas of the city for the retention and utilization of open space and/or agricultural uses, prevent scattered non-farm uses from developing improperly, and to secure economy in government expenditures for public utilities and service. (2�1) terse ZLot area- Mminimum: two acres. (32) Base 1Lot width.- Mminimum: 200 feet. (D) Residential Amenities District (R -A). The purpose of the "R -A" rResideneetial Amenities dDistrict is to provide move up housing in the form of low density, single- family, detached residential dwelling units and directly related complementary uses in areas of high natural residential amenities including such conditions as woodlands, wetlands, and significant views. (1 `Maimiam density t#riotighnr r�erf nee standards! 10,890 sq. ft. Per "„ tmits per- gross aer-e).- (2) Base density. 16,000 sq. ft. per- unit (2.7 units per- gross acme). (�1) Base lot area. (a) Minimum: 14,000 sq. ft. (b) Average: 16,000 sq. ft. (at least 40% of lots created through subdivision shall exceed 15,000 sq. ft. in size). (42) Base lot width. (a) Minimum: 90 ft. (b) Average: 100 ft. (at least 40% of lots created through subdivision shall exceed 100 ft. in width). 12 III jib -now' 64101M.11.10"Iffln"', - i. (C) Agricultural Open Space District (A -O). The purpose of the "A -O" aAgricultural- o0ven sSpace dDistrict is to provide suitable areas of the city for the retention and utilization of open space and/or agricultural uses, prevent scattered non-farm uses from developing improperly, and to secure economy in government expenditures for public utilities and service. (2�1) terse ZLot area- Mminimum: two acres. (32) Base 1Lot width.- Mminimum: 200 feet. (D) Residential Amenities District (R -A). The purpose of the "R -A" rResideneetial Amenities dDistrict is to provide move up housing in the form of low density, single- family, detached residential dwelling units and directly related complementary uses in areas of high natural residential amenities including such conditions as woodlands, wetlands, and significant views. (1 `Maimiam density t#riotighnr r�erf nee standards! 10,890 sq. ft. Per "„ tmits per- gross aer-e).- (2) Base density. 16,000 sq. ft. per- unit (2.7 units per- gross acme). (�1) Base lot area. (a) Minimum: 14,000 sq. ft. (b) Average: 16,000 sq. ft. (at least 40% of lots created through subdivision shall exceed 15,000 sq. ft. in size). (42) Base lot width. (a) Minimum: 90 ft. (b) Average: 100 ft. (at least 40% of lots created through subdivision shall exceed 100 ft. in width). 12 TABLE 3-4 R -A DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) Max Minimu Minimum Roof Height Minimum Floor m Pitch & Soffit Front Interior Street Rear (stories / Areas Building (vertical rise/ Side {� Side ft.) (sq ft.) Width horizontal run) ) Single Minimum foundation 6 in. / 12 ft. Family 35 10 20 30 2.5 stories sizes by home type [3] 24 No minimum 117 [2] 35 feet soffit Building 2000 fmishable [4] 11 [1]: For interior lots in R-1 and R -A districts, attached accessory stpdetures uses m^ ' ^ ^" .. ^a to meet ^ shall be setback no less than 6 feetfeet sethaek from the side yard property line, provided that the sum of both side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet. [2]: The required rear yard shall consist of a space at least 30 -feet in depth across the entire width of the lot that is exclusive of wetlands, ponds, or slopes greater than 12%. [3]: 2400 square foot gross floor area excluding a basement or cellar for two story homes and a 1,600 square foot foundation for multi-level, rambler and split entry homes. [4]: Finishable square footage is exclusive of required attached aeeesseff space garage floor area. [1 Roof gables, shed roofs, dormers and porch roofs to allow for a lower pitch to incorporate as an architectural feature, provided no such exempted roof areas shall comprise any more than 20% of the - An attached garage shall be included with all principal residential structures in the R -A district. Accessory - See § 153.092(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Structures - The minimum floor area for all the required attached age shall be 700 sq. ft. and Uses - No portion of any garage space may be more than five feet closer to the street than the front building line of the principal use (including porch). - See footnote f 11 above as related to setbacks for attached accessorystmetufes uses on interior lots. Other - § 153.042, Common District Requirements Regulations - § 153.043(B), Standards Applicable to All Residential Base Zoning Districts to Consult - § 153.070, Building Materials (not all - § 153.067, Off -Street Parking inclusive) - § 153.060, Landscaping and Screening Standards (E) Single -Family Resideneetial District (R-1). The purpose of the "R-1" &Single-family Residential dDistrict is to provide for low density, single-family, detached residential dwelling units and directly related complementary uses. I�i�� EZTJ7' R!*se.S�i �riTiTiTsl: �!7�!lel�e - � (3�1) Base lot area. (a) Minimum: 10,000 sq. ft. (b) Average: 12,000 sq. ft. (at least 40% of lots created through subdivision shall exceed 12,000 sq. ft. in size). (42) Base lot width. (a) Minimum: 70 ft. 13 (b) Average: 80 ft. (at least 40% of lots created through subdivision shall exceed 80 ft. in width). TABLE 3-5 R-1 DEVELOPMENT Minimum LotArea/Unit Base Density STANDARDS 10,000 s . ft. 4.3 tmits/aef-e REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) Max Townhome* Minimu Minimum Roof Height Minimum Floor m Pitch &Soffit Front Interior Street Rear (stories / Areas Building (vertical rise/ Side [�j Side ft) (sq ft.) Width horizontal run) Single 10 1,050 foundation/ 5 in. / 12 ft. Family 30 L11 and 20 30 2.5 stories 2,000 finishable 24 No minimum Building [2] 35 feet [4] soffit 5 [1]: For interior lots in R-1 and R -A districts, attached accessory stpa4ffes uses may be allewea *^ ^ ^^* shall be setback no less than 6 feetfeet sethaek from the side yard property line, provided that the sum of both side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet. [2]: The required rear yard shall consist of a space at least 30 -feet in depth across the entire width of the lot that is exclusive of wetlands, ponds, or slopes greater than 12 percent. [3]: 2400 square foot gross floor area excluding a basement or cellar for two story homes and a 1600 square foot foundation for multi-level, rambler and split entry homes. [4]: Finishable square footage is exclusive of required attached aeeessefy space gangge floor area. lV Roofgables, shed roofs, dormers and porch roofs to allow for a lower pitch to incorporate as an architectural feature, provided no such exempted roof areas shall comprise any more than 20% of the total horizontal roof area of since -family structure as measured from a bird's -eve plan view. - An attached garage shall be included with all principal residential structures in the R -A district. Accessory - See § 153.092(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Structures - The minimum floor area for all the required attacheda� raQe shall be 550 sq. ft. and Uses - See footnote [ 1 ] above as related to setbacks for attached accessory structures uses on interior lots. Other - § 153.042, Common District Requirements Regulations - § 153.043(B), Standards Applicable to All Residential Base Zoning Districts to Consult - § 153.070, Building Materials (not all - § 153.067, Off -Street Parking inclusive) - § 153.060, Landscaping and Screening Standards (F) Single and Two -Family Residencetial District (R-2). The purpose of the "R-2" sSingle and tTwo-family rResidential dDistrict is to provide for low to moderate density one and two unit dwellings and directly related complementary uses. (21) Base density. Unit Type Minimum LotArea/Unit Base Density Single-family 10,000 s . ft. 4.3 tmits/aef-e Duple/Two-family 7,000 sq. ft. 6.2 units pe- aer-e Townhome* 7,000 sq. ft. 6.2 • its/ er-e 14 Multi -Family (3-4 units)* 10,00 A f. fi fst unit 4,000 sq. ft for- o.,e c o 6.8, nits i,, o additional tia4 5,500 sq. ft. *By conditional use permit onl . See also Multi- amily dwellin unit standards. (32) Minimum lot width. R-2 District Original Plat Lot Width 80 ft. 66 ft. TABLE 3-6 R-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Required Yards (in feet) Minimum Minimum Max Minimum Finished Minimum Roof Pitch & Height Floor Floor Area Building Soffit Front Interior Street Rear (stories / Areas (sq. ft.) Width (sq. (vertical rise/ Side [I} Side ft) (sq ft) [31 ft) [31 horizontal run) 1,050 Minimum Single 10 2.5 foundation/ finished Family 30 L17 and 20 30 stories 1,800 square 24 Building 35 feet finishable footage [2] [3] must be equivalent 5 in, / 12 ft. 2.5 to the No minimum Duplex 30 10 [2] 20 30 stories principal 24 soffit 35 feet 1,050 foundation use unit 4 Townhouse/ 2.5 1,400 foundation Multi- 30 10 20 30 stories finishable size 24 Family 35 feet Building [1]: For the Original Plat of Monticello and Lower Monticello, where adjacent structures (excluding accessory buildings within same block) have front yard setbacks different from those required, the front yard minimum setback shall be the average of the adjacent structures. If there is only one adjacent structure, the front yard minimum setback shall be the average of the required setback and the setback of the adjacent structure. [2]: Interior side yard setbacks for single-family homes on lots of record with a lot width 66 feet or less in the Original Plat of Monticello and Lower Monticello shall be at least six feet. [3]: Finishable and finished square footage is exclusive of required attached garage space oor area [4]: Roof gables, shed roofs, dormers and porch roofs to allow for a lower pitch to incorporate as an architectural feature, provided no such exempted roof areas shall comprise any more than 20% of the total horizontal roof area of a structure as measured from a bird's eye plan view. - An attached garage shall be included with all principal residential structures in the R-1 district. Accessory - See § 153.092(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Structures The minimum floor area for all required attached garages shall be 450 sq. ft. - No portion of any attached garage may be more than 10 feet closer to the street that the principal structure. and Uses - Except for single-family buildings, any driveway leading directly to an attached garage may not exceed 18 "in width at the front yard property line. Other - § 153.042, Common District Requirements Regulations - § 153.043(B), Standards Applicable to All Residential Base Zoning Districts to Consult - § 153.070, Building Materials (not all - § 153.067, Off -Street Parking inclusive) I - § 153.060, Landscaping and Screening Standards 15 (G) Traditional Neighborhood Resideneetial District (T -N). The purpose of the "T -N" tTraditional nNeighborhood rResidential dDistrict is to provide for medium density, single-family, detached residential dwelling units and directly related complementary uses. (3) Minimum -lot area. Nfinim-um. 75,500 sq. ft. (4) Baw Minimum lot width. (a) rfi,,;v,-,,,v,,: 455 ft. Q Minimum Lot Depth: 100 ft. TABLE 3-7 T -N DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) Max Minimu Minimum Roof Height Minimum Floor m Pitch &Soffit Front Interior Street Rear (stories / Areas Building (vertical rise/ P4 Side Side ft.) t (sq ft.) Width horizontal run) (f Single Family 325 117 10 20 30 [2] 1,050 foundation/ 5 in. / 12 ft. Building 2.5 stories 35 feet 2,000 finishable 24 [2] No minimum soffit Wigle Fly nzarvRcs Rem T zoaA -1 5 g 4-5 2-5 %U [1]: The minimum width of the dimension of the principal buildinglg area across thefront building line shall be no less than 12 ft., which may include a usable porch of at least 6 ft. in depth. The maximum buildingline the attached garage may be no more than 20 ft. across the front buildinjz line maxim -um fent 5, ,.a shall be 30 feet fr Fent lead homes and`25 root for- F -ea . lead homes. [2]: Finishable square footage is exclusive of re wired attached accessory space garage floor area. - An attached garage shall be included with all principal residential structures in the T -N district. - See § 153.092(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Accessory - The minimum floor area for al} the required attachedag raje shall be 480 sq. ft. Structures - For front -loaded attachedaccessery structures ag rages, no portion of any garage space may be more than and Uses five feet closer to the street than the front building line of the principal use (including porch). - No private driveway leading to an accessory structure may exceed 4$24 ft. in width at the front yard property line. Driveways shall be offset and se aroted to maximize on -street parkinZcagaft Other - § 153.042, Common District Requirements Regulations - § 153.043(B), Standards Applicable to All Residential Base Zoning Districts to Consult - § 153.070, Building Materials (not all - § 153.067, Off -Street Parking inclusive) - § 153.060, Landscaping and Screening Standards (H) Medium Density Residence District (R-3). The purpose of the "R-3" fnMedium dDensity rResidential dDistrict is to provide for medium density housing in multiple - 16 family structures ranging up to and including 12 units and directly related, complementary uses. .r�s*arIWIPTNT"MMOURF.T."ME _ (b) Multi 5,124 sq. t. pew unit (eight and one half units per- aer-e+. (5) Base lot area. (a) Minimum townhouse: 20,000 sq. ft. (b) Minimum multi -family: 30,000 sq. ft. (6) Base lot width. Minimum: 80 ft. 17 TABLE 3-8 R-3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 'PUD Optionsfo hill E,.,,.;�.. R-3 District R-3 District � Townhouse (4 — 10 units / building) Multi -Family (6-5 —12 units/building) Base Lot Area Minimum 20,000 s£ 30,000 sf. Base Lot Width (Minimums 80 ft. 80 ft. Gross Density 3-7 du/acre 8-12 du/acre Max Density w/o PUD 4.0 du/acre 8.5 du/acre Net lot area per du 4,500 sf/du, maximum 3,500 sf/du, maximum Front setback 30 feet 40 feet Corner side setback 25 feet 30 feet Interior side setback 20 feet 20 feet Rear setback to building 30 feet 40 feet Clear open space setback from 25 feet 30 feet ROW Clear open space setback from 10 feet 30 feet Property Line Buffer Req. to Single Family B buffer B buffer Common open space per du NA 500 sf/du Landscaping 16 ACl/acre +2 shrubs per 10 feet bldg. 16 ACl/acre +2 shrubs per 10 feet bldg. perimeter perimeter Parking requirements _'.5 scree_ a= a 1.2 spaces1hedroom, with 2 2.5 spaees�du 1.2 spaces/bedroom, with 21 1 space/bedroom enclosed s ace/bedroom enclosed Architecture 20% street min frontage covered with 20% street min frontage covered with enhanced materials enhanced materials Roofs 5:12 pitch or roofline or building line 5:12 pitch or roofline or building line articulation, including flat and/or varied articulation, including flat and/or varied rooflines, parapets, canopies or other rooflines, parapets, canopies or other similar features which increase similar features which increase architectural interest and variability. architectural interest and variability. Unit square feet 1,000 sf, fmished floor area per unit, Averaze 1,000 s£ finished floor area per minimum unit, minimum Garages Attached Enclosed, may be detached Garage Setback 30 feet from ROW (35 feet from curb of May not access street directly — must be private street) served by interior driveway Garage Doors Maximum 16 feet width facing street -_ No smooth panel doors. Detached nNo smooth panel doors buildings must match principal building materials and include architectural fenestration on sides facing residentially zoned property or public ri ht of wa PUD Options for Multi -Family Townhouse (4 — 10 units / building) Multi -Family (6-5 —12 units/building) Buildin s Landscaping Special landscape features including water Increased landscape quantities and/or features, recreational structures, patios, Sizes beyond code minimums; Special etc. landscape features including water features, recreational structures, patios, etc. Open Space Increased open space areas per unit -- beyond code minimums of 10% or more Parking All required garage parking attached to rind al buildin Building Materials Increased use of stone, brick beyond front, Increased use of stone, brick beyond front, or on other exterior walls or on other exterior walls IV Architecture Extensive use of ornamental features, Extensive use of ornamental features, of: single family homes-. building and/or roofline articulation, building and/or roofline articulation, fenestration and building wall undulation fenestration and building wall undulation atypical of other buildings in similar atypical of other buildings in similar zoning districts zoning districts Site Work Use of decorative paving materials in Use of decorative paving materials in parking, sidewalks, etc.; Extensive use of parking, sidewalks, etc.; ornamental site lighting or similar features. Extensive use of ornamental site li htin or similar features. Housing for Seniors restricted Accommodations to design and density Accommodations to design and density to 55 years of age or more through PUD process only through PUD process only (I) Medium -High Density Residence District (R-4). The purpose of the "R-4", mMedium- h gh dDensity rResidential dDistrict is to provide for medium to high density housing in multiple -family structures of 13 or more units per building, and at densities of between ten and 25 units per acre. The district is intended to establish higher density residential opportunities in areas appropriate for such housing, to be determined by the city on a case by case basis. This district is intended to provide exclusively multiple e amily housing defined in this chanter. as onnosed to lower densitv housing tunes such as townhouses. two-family homes, or single family homes. The City of Monticello shall zone land to the R-4 District only when, in its sole discretion, all aspects of the property support the potential uses of the R-4 district, including location, private and public services, and compatibility with existing and future land uses in the area. In making a determination as to the suitability of a site for R-4 rezoning, the city will prioritize the following site and area factors: (1) Replacement land uses. R-4 zoning fits the following zoning categories and circumstances: (a) Land already zoned for R-3 Medium Density Residential District (b) Land currently zoned for commercial uses, but which would not be considered "prime" commercial and critical to "Successful Commercial Centers and Corridors " consistent with the City's 2040 Vision + Plan. (the eit., would like to to "prime" Eemmer-eial are -as that show the most pr-efnise for- tha4 use in the fittafe)-. defined in this ehaptef, as opposed to lower denssit 2s8=ckC�i-c^c� townhouses, two family homes, of: single family homes-. (6) Minimum and maximum density: ten 10 units minimum — 25 dwelling units maximum per acre. a 19 TABLE 3-9: R-4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PUD Qpdonsfof n.r„� R-4 District Multi -Family (13+ units / building) Base Loge area 30,000 sf Gross Density 10-25 du/acre Max Density w/o PUD NA Net lot area per du Max 1,750 sf/du Front setback 100 feet Corner side setback 40 feet Interior side setback 30 feet Rear setback to building 40 feet Clear open space setback from ROW 60 feet Clear open space setback from Property Line 40 feet — no more than 50% of any yard facing a street covered with parking/drive aisles Buffer Req. to Single Family C buffer Common open space per du 500 sf/du Landscaping 2 ACl/ 2,500 sf open space + 4 shrubs /10 feet bldg. perimeter Parking requirements 2.25 spaees/dw 1.2 spaces/bedroom with max 1.1 space/du uncovered Architecture 20% street min frontage covered with enhanced materials, horizontal siding of steel or cement -board only no vinyl or aluminum Roofs 5:12 pitch, plus roof ridge line articulation of 3 feet min. or roofline or building line articulation, including flat and/or varied rooflines, parapets, canopies or other similar features which increase architectural interest and variability. Unit square feet 999 800 sf minimum finished floor area per unit average, with no more than 10% o the units as studio units Garages Attached or Underground Detached accessory garages allowed only after base requirements are met; requires authorization throw h Conditional Use Permit Garage Setback May not access street directly — must be served by interior driveway Garage Doors Must include glass and decorative panels if visible from public street or adjoining residentially zoned property PUD Options for Multi -Family Buildin ,rs R-4 District Multi -Family (13+ units /building) Landscaping Increased landscape quantities and/or sizes beyond code minimums; Special landscape features including water features, recreational structures, patios, etc Open Space Increased open space areas per unit beyond code minimums of 10% or more Parking All required garage parking underground Building Materials Increased use of stone, brick beyond front, or on other exterior walls Architecture Extensive use of ornamental features, building and/or roofline articulation, fenestration and building wall undulation atypical of other buildings in similar zoning districts Site Work Use of decorative paving materials in parking, sidewalks, etc.; Extensive use of ornamental site lighting or similar features. Housing for Seniors restricted to 55 years of age or more Accommodations to design and density through PUD process only C (J) Mobile and Manufactured Home Park District (M -H). The purpose of the "M -H" manufactured home park district is to provide for manufactured home users and directly related uses. SECTION 13. 1 Maximum density flffough PUP P or-Fer-fvfmal}ee standards: 3,350 sq. ft.Fef unit (13.0 units per- gross roe (L1) Base density: 4,000 sq ft per unit (10.9 units per gross acre). (�2) Base lot area. Minimum: 5 acres. (43) Base lot width. Minimum: 200 ft. § 153.044 BUSINESS BASE ZONING DISTRICTS is hereby amended to strike all photographs showing typical district building forms in sections (C) — (H) SECTION 14. § 153.044 BUSINESS BASE ZONING DISTRICTS is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) Standards applicable to all business base zoning districts. (1) Condominiums. (a) mal Commercial structures may be divided for the purpose of condominium ownership. (b) Condominiums shall be designed to meet the International Building Code as adopted in the Monticello City Code. NO WN 0"111141 ATA A NOW ON I I (F) Regional Business District, B-4. The purpose of the "B-4" rRegional bBusiness dDistrict is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. (1) Base lot area. No minimum. (2) Base lot width. No Minimum. 21 TABLE 3-14: B-4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) (% of gross lot Side Side area) 2 stories All Uses 9 6' 9 6' 9 6' 0 6' 30 feet (Reserved) (Reserved) [1] [1]: Multi -story buildings maybe allowed as a conditional use pursuant to §153.028(D) contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures - See § 153.092(B)for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. - § 153.042, Common District Requirements Other - § 153.043(B), Standards Applicable to All Residential Base Zoning Districts Regulations - § 153.060, Landscaping and Screening Standards to Consult - § 153.064, Signs (not all - § 153.067, Off -Street Parking inclusive) - § 153.068, Off-street loading spaces - § 153.070, Building Materials (G) Central Community District, CCD. (1) (d) Sub -districts. The CCD is hereby divided into five subdistricts, four of which comprise the study area of the Small Area Plan and are known (l River-fFefft; (2) Broadway; (3) W.,tnr'rc and Gedaf Stir -e +"; and 4) Pine Street. A fifth ccs,-distr-iC " shall beanyarea within the GCD that is no identified as being within . o of the four- nme sub disti7iets. The CCD regulations shall apply uniformly across all sub -districts unless specific sub -district requirements apply. The City Council shall, in accordance with the process providing for zoning map amendments in the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, adopt a zoning map for the CCD area identifying the subdistrict boundaries. The sub -districts and are known as: (1.4 River cont; L2.4 Broadway; Walnut and Cedar Streets: affd {4.4 Pine Street. and "sad -tic "General "shall be any area within the CCD that is not identified as being within one of the four named sub- di.ctrirk (3) General requirements. 22 (c) Private joint parking use. All new non-residential parking areas shall be designed to accommodate cross -access and joint use throughout the CCD zoning district to minimize the need for parking infrastructure. (f) Building materials. Building materials for all uses shall be predominantly glass, brick, natural or cultured stone, or equivalent masonry material. Mater-ials for Garrod siding, board and batter or shake exteriorshall becemposrte, mailitenainee fFee fnat€r-i-als, and shall be limited in eveFall exteFioF use to: 1. Materials for lapped siding, board -and -batten, or shake exteriors shall be composite, maintenance free materials, and shall be limited in overall exterior use to: Residential s*,.,,etffes, no more than 30% of building exteriorfor residential structures. (4) Performance standards. (a) Character area standards. 4. Riverfront. a. Features such as upper balconies, dormers, courtyards, porches and dooryards shall be incorporatedfor residential uses. b. Buildings shall be between 2- 4 stories; additional stories may be authorized by conditional use permit. Sin lg e-stoty buildings may be approved through site plan review by the Planning Commission and the City Council where multiple stories are impractical for the specific use. In such cases, the building architecture should incorporate a facade that mimics multiple stories through additional window openings or similar°features. c. Buildings shall be oriented toward river and public rip_ht of way corners where applicable. (b) Use type standards. 1. Residential. c. Multi four -12 du. (i) Only allowed where the subject property has no frontage on Broadway, Walnut/Cedar. Conditionally permitted where the property has direct frontage on Broadway or Walnut/Cedar. (ii) Must preserve open space to coordinate with public spaces. (iii) Building heights up to 35 feet or three stories above grade; additional stories authorized through conditional use permit. 23 (iv) Setbacks – 15 feet from abutting single-family, minimum of eight feet from public street. Interior side setbacks may be zero. (v) Variable roofline and front building walls. (vi) Garage entrances may not face a public street. (vii) Garages which face a single-family residential zoning district must screen the garage entrance from the eye -level view of the abutting property. (viii) All parking in attached garages within building footprint (no surface parking). (ix) Parking ratio of 1.7 spaces per du, off-street, or a minimum of no less than one space per bedroom, off-street, whichever is greater. As part of site plan review, the Planning Commission may impose a different (higher or lower) standard where the nature of the use supports such standard. (x) Residential units on upper, non -ground floors of buildings in the Riverfront Character Area are permitted as a part of mixed-use buildings by conditional use permit. d. Multi 13+ du. (i) Only allowed where the subject property has no frontage on Broadway, Walnut/Cedar. Conditionally permitted where the property has direct frontage on Broadway or Walnut/Cedar. (ii) Must preserve open space to coordinate with public spaces. (iii) Building heights up to 50 feet or four stories above grade; additional stories authorized through conditional use permit. (iv) Setbacks —shall be -15 feet from abutting single-family, minimum of ei& 8 feet from public street. Interior side setbacks may be zero. (v) Variable roofline and front building walls. (vi) Garage entrances may not face a public street. (vii) Garages which face a single-family residential zoning district must screen the garage entrance from the eye -level view of the abutting property. (viii) All required parking shall be located in attached garages within building footprint (no surface parking). (ix) Parking ratio of 1.-71 spaces per dwelling unit bedroom including adjacent on -street parking, or a minimum of no less than one space per bedroom, off-street, whichever is greater. As part of site plan review, the Planning Commission may impose a different (higher or lower) standard where the nature of the use supports such standard. (x) Multiple -family housing limited to seniors may reduce parking supply to half spaces per dwelling unit, off-street. As part of site plan review, the Planning Commission may impose a different (higher or lower) standard where the nature of the type of senior living use supports such standard. (xi) Residential units on upper, non -ground floors of buildings in the Riverfront and Broadway Character Area are permitted as a part of mixed-use buildings. e. Ground floor residential units. When allowed, subject to: (i) Common areas, lobbies, etc. (if any) should be oriented toward street. (ii) Street levels should include additional window and doorway glass exposure toward streets. • .mesa (d) Parking. 4. Parking shall not be located on a parcel between the front building line of the principal building and the public street, except where expresslyprovided for by the City Council after recommendation from the Planning Commission. (e) Other performance standards. 1. All other performance standards as identified in §§ 153.060 through 153.072 shall apply, unless otherwise addressed in this section. 2. Maximum residential density: 25.0 dwelling units per gross acre. 3. Maximum Bbuilding height. ' : 60 feet. a. Buildings may exceed 50 feet in height by conditional use permit, with enhanced site improvements, architecture, and building materials. 25 6. Lot coverage, buildings. a. Minimum building lot coverage: 20%. b. Maximum building lot coverage: 90%. 97. Accessory structures. a. For commercial uses, Ttrash handling equipment shall be located within buildings wherever practical. If located in a structure attached to, or detached from, the principal building, such structure shall screen the trash handling equipment from the view of all neighboring property and public rights-of-way, and shall be constructed of materials which comprise the principal building. Gates and/or doors shall be constructed of permanent opaque materials, matching the principal building in color, and shall be kept closed at all times other than when being used for access. Roofs for such structures are encouraged, but not required when the screening wall of the enclosure is at least eight feet in height. b. For mixed-use and multi e amily residential uses, trash handling equipment shall be located within the principal building. c. Any other accessory structures allowed in the CCD (see Table 5-4 — Accessory Uses by District) shall meet all requirements of the CCD district applicable to principal buildings. SECTION 15. § 153.044 BUSINESS BASE ZONING DISTRICTS, Section (G) CCD District, City of Monticello CCD Sub -District map shall be stricken from the ordinance and shall be adopted as part of the City of Monticello Official Zoning Map. SECTION 16. § 153.045 INDUSTRIAL BASE ZONING DISTRICTS is hereby amended to strike all photographs showing typical district building in sections (C) — (E). SECTION 17. § 153.045 INDUSTRIAL BASE ZONING DISTRICTS is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) Standards applicable to all industrial base zoning districts. we Z!'SY�S'� IE1ri�fTs!llEar:EI.T.�S�Efff!T�SiILLUUMILLSM M" . tiPES'��T:lT�:l7ww -v S'RfM, SECTION 18. § 153.046 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS is hereby amended to read as follows: (N) Wetland District. (3) General provisions. (a) Identification and delineation of wetlands. 4. This section establishes four wetland classifications as defined in § 153.012: exceptional quality, high quality, medium quality, and low quality. Wetland classifications shall be established through a wetland functional assessment. (4) General standards. The following standards apply to all lands containing or abutting a wetland: (a) Septic and soil absorption systems must be set back a minimum of 75 feet from the city approved boundary of the wetland. (b) The lowest ground floor elevation of a structure shall be two feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, three feet above the ordinary high water mark, or three feet above the highest known water level, whichever is greater, of public waters regulated by § 153.046(D) and § 153.046(E), whichever is greater. (c) Structures intended to provide access across a wetland shall be prohibited unless a permit is obtained in conformance with state regulations. (d) The MPCA's Best Management Practices and Minnesota Storm Water Manual, as applicable, shall be followed to avoid erosion and sedimentation during the construction process. (e) City inspeetion sehedules and fines for- erosion eoi4fel will double on is abutting wetlap l& (f) Before the city issues a building permit for a lot with a required wetland buffer, the lot owner shall. 27 - linstall the wetland monumentation required by § 153.046(C)(4)(f). (5) Wetland buffer strips and setbacks. SECTION 19. § 153.046 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS, Division (S) Performance Based Enhancement District is hereby stricken in its entirety, with the divisions and subsections following to be renumerated accordingly. SECTION 20. § 153.048 POINTES AT CEDAR DISTRICT is hereby amended to read as follows: (A) Purpose. The purpose of the PCD, Pointes at Cedar District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the district for mixed land uses consistent with the direction of the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan chapter of the Comprehensive Plan.. and consistent with The Pointes at Cedar Ordinance No. 776. adopted herein by reference. (B) Permitted uses. Permitted principal uses in the Pointes at Cedar District shall be those identified in the Pointes at Cedar Zoning District and on the PCD Zoning Map. The introduction of any other use from any district shall be reviewed under the requirements of the PCD ordinance requirements and process. (E) Amendments. Where changes to any proposed project in the PCD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the approved development stage PCD plan under the terms of the PCD ordinance text and requirements. The city may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PCD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. SECTION 21. § 153.060 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING is hereby amended to read as follows: (A) Section organization. The Monticello landscaping and screening standards are organized into the following main divisions: (1) Division (B), Purpose and Intent. Sets out the purpose and intent for the standards; (2) Division (C), General Requirements for Landscaping. Includes the applicability provisions, requirements for landscaping plans, and standards for new plantings; 009. (3) Division (D), Landscaping Plan Requirements. Outlines the specific information that must be supplied to the city anytime a landscape plan is required by this chapter; (4) Division (E),; 4 1temativ r ,., a, eapiH . p aH T,,eludes the r edufes an standards for- r-eviewof „itom.,tive i,,,,,as,.,,ping rlaas Standards for Site Landscaping. Introduces standards for foundation plantings around some buildings; (5) Division (F), rt,., a rdsf „ Ve ; ,a r Use Ore Landve6TMg. inel des the standards for- landseaping afound the perimeter- and within vehiettlar- use afeas Alternative Landscaping Plan. Includes the procedures and standards° or review of alternative landscaping plans; (6) Division (G), rt,., a tW o , Perimeter Bufftrs. T,,eludes the landsea, ing bu standards applied to the edges of some i ase zoning dist,.; Standards for Vehicular Use Area Landscaping. Includes the standards for landscaping around the perimeter and within vehicular use areas; (7) Division (H), rta dards c , Required SereeHing. T,,eludes the reqements for site features like r-efitse, leading, and sefviee-areas Standardsfor Perimeter Buffers. Includes the landscaping buffer standards applied to the edges of some base zoning districts, (8) Division (I), Standards for Required Screening. Includes the screening requirements for site features like refuse, loading, and service areas StaHda tWsfer Site LandseapiHg. intr-aduees standards for- foundation piantings ar-ound some buildings -,t (9) Division (J), Zoning Specific Landscaping Standards. Includes specific landscaping standards specific to zoning district. (C) General requirements for landscaping. (4) Stabilization. All required landscape planting areas and required yards shall be stabilized and maintained with lawn, ground covers, mulches, or other approved materials to prevent soil erosion and allow rainwater infiltration. (7) SeddgGround cover when no landscaping or site plan is required. All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with approved site or landscaping plans shall be seeded or sodded with lawn cover. Exceptions to this criterion may be approved by the Community Development Department as follows: (a) Seeding of fulufe expansion areas as shwA% on approyeTplafi&.— or commercial, industrial and institutional uses, native planting per an Alternative Landscaping Plan approved by the Community Development Department. (b) Undisturbed areas containing existing viable natural vegetation which can be maintained free of foreign and noxious plant materials. (c) Areas designated as open space or future expansion areas properly planted and maintained with prairie grass. 3t (d) Use of mulch materials such as bark, rock mulch over four mil poly, and wood chips in support of shrubs and foundation plantings. (D) Landscaping plan requirements. (2) Detailed landscape plans shall include the following information: (E) Alternative landscaping plan. (1) Purpose. In cases where development conditions require a deviation from the landscaping standards in this section or the tree protection standards in § 153.061, Tree Protection, an alternative landscaping plan shall be required. An alternative landscaping plan may also be provided for native landscaping for commercial, industrial, civic and institutional use sites where the use of native plantings rroresents consistency with the goals of the comprehensive plan. An alternative landscaping plan shall indicate how compliance with the standards in this chapter is impossible or impractical, and shall illustrate how compliance can be achieved to the maximum extent practicable. Nothing in § 153.060(E) shall prohibit a development configuration that meets or exceeds the landscaping and tree protection standards in this chapter. SECTION 22. § 153.060 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING, Division (I) Standards for Site Landscaping shall be renumerated to 153.060(E) with the subsequent divisions and subsections renumerated accordingly. SECTION 23. § 153.060 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING is hereby amended to read as follows: (F) Standards for vehicular use area landscaping. Except where exempted by § 153.060(F)(1) below, all vehicular use areas shall include landscaping both within the interior of the vehicular use area and around its perimeter, as a means of mitigating the parking area's microclimate and visual impacts. Vehicular use area landscaping, including perimeter vehicular use areas. g may be counted toward overall site landscaping requirements. (1) Exemptions. The following uses shall be exempt from the requirements to provide vehicular use area landscaping: (a) Single-family detached residential development; (b) Two- to four -family dwellings; (c) Off-street surface vehicular use areas with four or fewer spaces; (d) Parking structures; and (e) Vehicle display areas for commercial vehicle sales and rental uses. 30 (2) Interior vehicular use area landscaping standards. All ..ehiettla. use areas shall pfovide and maintain landscaped planting areas within the ifttefioF of the ehieti ,, , aeeor-danee with the following. (a) Configuration. interior- planting aFeas shall be designed ; aeeeFdanee with the following star a -r- s: Where islands are proposed for drainage and stormwater management, such islands shall be landscaped in accordance with this section of ordinance. (b) All vehicular use areas shall provide and maintain landscaped planting areas within the interior of the vehicular use area in accordance with this section of ordinance. (c) Configuration. Interior planting areas shall be designed in accordance with the following standards: (G) Standards for perimeter buffers. (5) Location of perimeter buffers. (a) Perimeter buffers required by this section shall be located only along the outer perimeter of the parcel where it abuts the adiacent impacted another parcel, and shall extend to the parcel boundary line or right-of- way line. (I) Standards for required screening. (3) Screening methods. (b) An opaque fence or wall meeting the following requirements: 1. The fence or wall shall be consistent with the standards in § 153.062, Fences and Walls. 2. The fence or wall shall be constructed of masonry, brick, wood, masonry free vinyl or steel constructed to be similar in appearance to materials commonly sold as fence material. 3. The fence or wall shall provide a solid screening effect and not exceed the maximum height allowed for fences or walls in the underlying zoning district, or be less than six feet in height. 4. The design and materials used in constructing a required screening fence shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. (J) Zoning district specific landscaping standards. (2) Traditional Neighborhood (TN) District Landscaping Requirements. Lots in the TN district shall adhere to the following additional landscaping requirements: (a) No less than 60% of the square footage of the front yard area shall be planted in gar -de meeting the following requirements: 31 1. Four caliper inches of canopy trees which must be no less than 3 caliper inches at DBH at time of planting, plus two ornamental trees. Trees may be planted in front or side yard. 2. No less than one shrub or perennial flower planting per 20 square feet of front yard area. 3. No less than one deciduous flower planting per 20 square feet of front yard area. (b) No private driveway leading to a garage may be more than 4-$ 24 feet in width at the front yard property line. (4) Industrial and Business Campus (IBC) District Landscaping Requirements. All IBC lots must include and maintain an operational irrigation system for the full site at time of certificate of occupancy unless excluded by an approved Alternative Landscaping Plan for Native Plantings. SECTION 24. § 153.062 FENCES AND WALLS is hereby amended to read as follows: (C) General requirements for fences and walls. (1) Location. (a) Fences and walls are permitted anywhere on a lot subject to the following restrictions: 1. The corner visibility requirements in § 153.042(D)(2)(b) shall be met. 2. Fences and walls shall not be located within public right-of-way 3. Fences and walls permitted by the Community Development Department to be within easements are subject to removal without compensation to the property owner if the city must access the area for maintenance or improvement purposes. 4. Fences and walls shall not be permitted within conservation easements unless specifically permitted by the easement. S. Fences and walls must be set back no less than 3' from any public trail or sidewalk. (D) Requirements for fences and walls by district type. All fences and walls shall conform to the following standards. In all cases, heights are measured from finished grade on the highest side of the fence or wall. (1) Residential districts. In residential districts (see Table 3-1: Base Zoning Districts), fences and walls shall conform to the following: (a) Front yards. 32 1. Fences and walls shall not exceed a height of four feet in front yards and that part of side yards from the front lot line to the front building line. 2. Fences and walls must be setback at least six (6) feet from the property line when adjacent to a public right of waw 3. Fences and walls must be setback at least three (3) feet°from a public sidewalk or pathway. (b) Side or rear yards. 1. Fences and walls shall not exceed a height of seven feet in side and rear yards. 2. In side or rear yards which abut a public street, fences or walls which exceed 36 inches in height must be set back at least six feet from the property line, and the sethaek area shat !andseaped in aeeor-danee with the provisions of § 153.062(j)(4), Appear -an . 3. Fences and walls must be setback at least three (3) feet from a public sidewalk or pathway. (c) Transparency. Fences or walls located within a front yard ^r side yar- adjacent to a street shall maintain a minimum of 50% transparency. (F) Perimeter fences and walls abutting public rights-of-way. (1) Fences or walls located within 15 feet of a street or public right-of-way shall: (a) Be of a uniform style; (b) Be located outside the public right-of-way; (c) Include breaks, offsets, access points, or other design details in the wall plane at least every 200 feet; (d) Comply with the standards in § > ; ( Comply with e F@gEquHr-emeH T✓�� szvrzccgzrircu (H) Chain linkfencing. Chain link fencing shall be allowed, subject to the following standards: (1) All districts. In all districts, chain link fences must have a top rail, and barbed ends must be placed at the bottom of the fence. (2) Residential districts. Chain link fencing is permitted on lots within residential zoning districts provided it does not include opaque slats, and does not exceed a height of four feet in the front yard and does not exceed five feet in the side and rear yard. 33 (3) Business districts. Chain link fencing shall not be allowed on lots within a business zoning district unless expressly authorized through approval of a security plan under the provisions of § 153.062(E). (4) Industrial districts. Chain link fencing shall be allowed on lots within industrial zoning districts provided it does not include opaque slats and is coated with black or dark green vinyl. (I) Barbed or razor wire. Barbed or razor wire is prohibited except as expressly authorized through approval of conditional use permit relating to security plan under the provisions of § 153.062(E). (J) Appearance. (4) Landscape screening. All fences and walls exceeding four feet in height and located within 15 feet of a public street right-of-way in a14 commercial and industrial districts, or as otherwise required by this chapter, shall be supplemented with landscape screening in accordance with the following standards to soften the visual impact of the fence or wall. SECTION 25. § 153.063 EXTERIOR LIGHTING is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) Applicability. (1) In general. The provisions of this section shall apply to all development in the city unless exempted in accordance with § 153.063(C) below. For new development, including new signs, the Community Development Department may require specification plans and light distribution plans to verify compliance with these standards. (E) Design standards for exterior lighting. All exterior lighting shall meet the following standards: (2) Shielding and Fixtures. (3) Maximum illumination levels. All outdoor lighting and indoor lighting visible from outside shall be designed and located so that the maximum illumination measured in footcandles at ground level at a property line or right-of-way center line shall not exceed the standards in Table 4-5, Maximum Illumination Levels. Cut-off lighting shall be designed to direct light downward (e.g., shoe box style). TABLE 4-5: MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION LEVELS Type of Use [1] Maximum Illumination (Footcandles) All Uses 0.5 at all ROW center lines Residential or Civic & Institutional Use 0.5 at Property Line Commercial or Industrial Use [2] 1.0 at Property Line Parking Lots 1.0 at Property Line [1]: See Table 5-1: Uses by District [2]: The minimum illumination level at the p eFt-y line shall be 0.2 footcandle 34 (G) Exemptions for a security plan. Government facilities, parks and open areas, utilities, and public safety, era ethe, u (see Table 5-1) where sensitive or dangerous materials are stored may submit to the Community Development Department a site security plan proposing exterior lighting that deviates from the standards in this division. The Community Development Department shall approve, or approve with conditions, the site security plan and its proposed deviation from the standards of this division, upon finding that: (I) Sign lighting. Lighting fixtures illuminating signs shall comply with the standards of this section, and exterior light sources shall be aimed and shielded so that direct illumination is focused exclusively on the sign face and the light source is not visible from off-site areas. A light distribution plan or other information demonstrating compliance with the lighting requirements of this ordinance. SECTION 26. § 153.064 SIGNS is hereby amended to read as follows: (H) General provisions. (2) Setbacks. All freestanding signs shall be set back 15 feet from any property line abutting a public right-of-way and five feet from any side or rear property line. No sign may be located within a drainage and utility easement. A certificate of survey may be required to verify sign setback in accordance with this ordinance. (11) Square footage calculation (total area = A x B): (a) For wall signs, the area of a sign shall be that area within the marginal lines created by the sign surface which bears the advertisement or, in the case of messages, figures or symbols attached directly to the part of a building, which is included in the smallest rectangular figure which can be made to circumscribe the message, figure, or symbol displayed thereon. (b) For monument signs, area shall be calculated as for wall signs. Structural members of the sign, including supports or other decorative features shall not be considered as a part of the measured sign area. (c) For pylon signs, the entire area of the sign face or cabinet shall be considered as a part of the measured sign area. Structural supports, provided that they have no message or other graphics, shall be exempt from the area calculation. 35 (d) A freestanding sign or sign structure constructed so that the faces are not back to back, shall not have an angleeparating thefacesexceeding thirty (30) degrees unless the total area of both sides added together does not exceed the maximum allowable sign area for that district. (20) Design and materials standards for signs in commercial districts, industrial districts, the CCD District, and PUDs,nd eo, N e as -ed e hr,,.eem�,�� (J) District regulations. In addition to the signs allowed by § 153.064(C) and § 153.064(I), the following signs shall be allowed within the specific zoning districts: (2) Within business and industrial zoning districts (see table 3-1), the following additional regulations shall apply: (d) Multiple occupancy commercial and industrial buildings. When a single principal building is devoted to two or more commercial or industrial principal uses, signs shall be allowed subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department based upon the following requirements: 1. The maximum individual sign sizes for multiple occupancy buildings and individual businesses that may display a sign shall not exceed the maximum provisions in the same zoning district in § 153.064(J). 2. Commercial retail, office, or mixed use multiple occupancy buildings may display a sibfreestanding sign consistent with the applicable zoning district provisions in § 153.064(J). 3. Individual tenants of a multiple occupancy building within a commercial or industrial zoning district shall no may display separate wall, canopy, or marquee signs except thr-o gh plan subject to the following requirements: a. Such sign shall be limited to the maximum wall sign size permitted in the applicable zoning district provisions in § 153.064(J). Sign area shall be calculated based on the facade area of each individual tenant space. b. Such signs shall net be located envy on an exterior walls_ facing residentially zoned properties or properties on which a residential use exists. c. A comprehensive sign plan is submitted that includes all of the following information: 36 (i) A site plan to scale showing the location of lot lines, buildings, structures, parking areas, existing and proposed signs, and any other physical features of the area included within the proposed comprehensive sign plan. (ii) Elevations to scale of buildings included within the comprehensive sign plan including the location of existing or proposed wall, canopy, or marquee signs. (iii) To scale plans for all existing and proposed signs of any type included within the comprehensive sign plan indicating area, dimensions, height, materials, colors, and means of illumination (if any). d. No permit shall be issued for a new or replacement sign for an individual tenant except upon a determination by the Community Development Department that it is consistent with the approved comprehensive sign plan. SECTION 27. § 153.066 TRANSTIONAL FEATURES is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) Applicability. (1) Transitional features shall be required when: (a) Dig -e -ent use Pfpes abut one other- (e.g. 0 . side 4ia ' institutional, ' eommer-eial1 (b) Adjacent residential lots contain differing densities (e.g. a single- family home site adjacent to a duplex); (c) A lot is developing or redeveloping within the R-2, CCD or T -N zoning districts; > B 2, B 3, B 4, (2) The Commidnity Development DepaAment may r-equir-e the use of (11) Provide landscape buffer Type "A" consistent with this ordinance. 37 SECTION 28. § 153.067 OFF-STREET PARKING is hereby amended to read as follows: (C) Change in use or occupancy. (3) Site plan drawing necessary. In all zoning districts, Aall applications for a building permit or prior to a change in use for an existing building or as required or a certificate of occupancy in all zoning districts shall be accompanied by a site plan drawn to scale and dimensioned indicating the location of off-street parking and loading spaces in compliance with the requirements set forth in § 153.067. (D) Prohibited uses related to off-street parking. (2) For single-family and two-family dwellings, off-street parking of passenger, small construction, emergency or any other commercial vehicles in the rear yard is prohibited as illustrated in Figure 4-11 and in Table 4-9. SECTION 29. § 153.067 TABLE 4-7 MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES BY USE is hereby amended and reordered as follows: Residential Uses Multiple Family In General 2.51_2 spaces for each dwelling emit bedroom, of which two one must be enclosed, plus one guest parking space for every four units, or as y otherwise besq3e�ed in the zoning distria Senior Housing- Independent Pesefvtien of area equal to10spuee pretial Livin development shall fygilir-e ��'.5 spaees per mit, -can said number- o f spaces ,ti. titin e until stieh time as the City Getmeil , side, -s n oa f ,- addit ,,,,ni 67 spaces per dwelling unit, plus one guest parkin space pace for every six units Senior Housing —Assisted Living 4.0 spaces plus. 67 spaces per dwelling nit, plus one nest parking space for evejy six units Assisted Living Facilities 4.0 spaces plus . 67 spaces per dwelling unit, plus one Quest parking space for every six units Commercial Uses B ,-d g House .datiens n pfevided f sleeping Entertainment/Recreation, Indoor Commercial W. Bowling Alley 5.0 spaces for each alley plus additional spaces as may See Parking Schedule #1 [§ 153.067(H)(2)] be required herein for related uses associated with the I See Parking Schedule #1 [§ 153.067(H)(2)] rinci al structure Theater 1.0 space for each four seats based on the design capacity of the main assembly hall; facilities as may be provided in conjunction with such buildings or uses shall be subject to additional requirements imposed by this chapter - If the theater is located in the original plat of Monticello, the required spaces shall be reduced to 1.0 space per five seats Other Uses See ParkinSchedule #2. Offices, Professional and Commercial 1.0 space for each 350 feet o�floor space Retail Commercial Uses Grocery Uses 1.0 spaces for each 200 squaresfeet - If in the CCD district, one space per 350 square feet otfloor space IfrGeneral Retail 1.0 space for each 200 square feet - If in the CCD district, one space per 350 square feet of floor space - Home improvement retail uses shall require 1.0 space or each 225 square feet Convenience Retail 1.0 spa e or each 250 square feet in .,,1,ie cnoi e of the g fleer- ., v is deveted to st.,,uge � war-ehouseT-c'i"a�t -e ,x be - of s,..aees m , ae deteFmined by either- of the listed opfiells OPTION #1: One s e fee o ,.t, 200 s e feet devated to „„ or- o 0 1.1:,, sales „l, o spaeefor-eaeh 500 square feet „fstorage e OPTION #2: One spaee for- eaeh empleyee on the maxin+Hm shift pitts one spae-e for- eaeh Inn e feet devoted to p4he sales or Industrial Uses Wrecker and Towin Services See Parking Schedule #1 [§ 153.067(H)(2)] Machine /Truck Repair and Sales I See Parking Schedule #1 [§ 153.067(H)(2)] SECTION 30. § 153.067 OFF-STREET PARKING is hereby amended to read as follows: (E) Standards applicable to all uses. (4) Vehicular use area stall calculation requirements. (b) Floor area. 4. Required parking spaces may be reduced through alternative development types (e.g. Planned Unit Development, utilization of provisions, etc) as permitted in this chapter. at (5) Vehicular use area design conditional use permit. Stall aisle and driveway design requirements outlined in § 153.067 may be lessened subject to the following conditions: (a) Any reduction OF in requirements as provided in this section requires completion of the conditional use permit process outlined in § 153.028(D). (b) Final appr-eval of pafkiag and driveway drainage plans asseeiated with conditiona lndit;..na , fmit request shall leo provided ; writing by he- r .. Development �;�Dor ,, E,,,o„t E,, g;,,vo,.;,, , o eater- t gr the portion of building pefmit fee alleeated for engineer- plan Feview shall be paid by apheant p tooceupaney ofstfuetur-e. Where a proposed use clearly demonstrates affirmative design efforts toward the preservation and enhancement of desirable natural site characteristics, ordinance- required paved parking spaces may be reduced and installation deferred until such time as the need for the full complement of parking. The need shall be determined in conformance with a Iroof o� parking" plan so approved through a Conditional Use Permit. (e) Only properties whieh have existing 1.,,ildi gs and are being expand ,dole f a new use shall be eligible for- this e ,nide fl,1 use permit. (dc) The applicant must show, and the Planning Commission must find, that there are existing nonconformities of the property orspecific circumstances related to site conditions w -hie>, are being eliminated by the remodeling which justify a deferral to the paving, landscaping, or curbing requirements. (e4) A deferral shall be considered by the city as a part of an application which includes full site plans, drawn to scale, of both the immediate paving, landscaping and curbing improvements and the ultimate paving, landscaping, and curbing improvements. (€e) In all districts other than the A -O District, this deferral shall apply only to the required paving, curbing and landscaping which is applicable to the existing portion of the use and building. Paving, curbing and landscaping attributable to any expansion shall be installed at the time of the expansion. .N (F) Standards applicable to residential uses. SECTION 31. (1) Location of required parking in residential areas. (a) For single-family and two-family dwellings, off-street parking on a paved driveway within 15 feet of any street surface shall be allowed as long as it does not block any public sidewalk or pathway. For single- amily and two-family dwellings, parking shall be located asfound in Table 4-9 and Figure 4-11. Parking on any side of any detached accessory structure shall be prohibited except in such case that the detached accessory structure is the only,garage for the properiy. (b) In the case of townhouse dwellings, parking shall be prohibited in any portion of the front yard except designated driveways leading directly into a garage or one open paved space located on the side of a driveway away from the principal use. Said extra space shall be surfaced with concrete or bituminous material. For single family an two family dwel ings a,. dag shall ieeatedas found in Table4-9,and Fi-gtir-€ 4-11. § 153.067 OFF-STREET PARKING, TABLE 4-9 is hereby amended to read as follows: TABLE 4-9 YARD FO REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF- STREET PARKING AREAS & DRIVEWAYS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS Location Diagram Passenger Recreational Emergency Small Other Area Key Vehicles Vehicles Vehicles Construction Notes Vehicles Side yard G Yes, within Yes, within a Yes, within a Yes, within a Must on a space space space space maintain corner lot consisting consisting consisting consisting of minimum facing a of the 15 of the 15 feet of the 15 feet the 15 feet -36 public feet adjacent to the adjacent to adjacent to the foot street adjacent building. the building setback to to the (unsurfaced) building (surfaced) side lot building (surfaced) line in all (surfaced) cases. T44s space may enCFoach to within 5 feet of the „�€ way, provided screening is t Off a 41 (2) Vehicular use area design in residential areas. (a) Curb cuts and access. 1. Single-family uses shall be limited to one curb cut access per property. 2. Curb cut access shall be at a minimum three feet from the side yard property in residential districts. 3.For single and two-family uses, a driveway or other impervious surface leading to a detached accessory structure in the rear yard shall require authorization through conditional use permit, unless such driveway serves a structure in the rear yard that is the only garage for the residential use. (c) Residential district garage requirements. In all residential zoning districts, all detached single-family homes, two-family and duplex units shall include development of an attached or detached garage. The minimum size requirement for the garage floor shall be 450 sq. ft. with a maximum door hei hit of 9 ft. and minimum garage door opening of 16 ft. with the following exceptions and/or deviations by district: 1. R-1 District. An attached garage of at least 550 square feet shall be constructed as part of any single-family home. 2. R -A District. a. An attached garage of at least 700 square feet shall be constructed as part of any single-family home. (G) Standards applicable to commercial, industrial and civic/institutional uses. (2) Vehicular use area design applicable to commercial, industrial & civic/institutional uses. (a) Access and curbing. 42 (c) Perimeter vehicular use buffer. 1. Open, non-residential off-street parking areas shall be designed to screen headlights -from abutting ^r s,,,...,,,,ndin . residential districts through the use of a half -berm design. Said design shall -be required in all instances where headlights are directed at surrounding or abutting residential -properties. A half -berm is required in addition to any buffer yard landscaping requirements with a design -as illustrated in Figure 4-12:_ (3) Joint facilities for commercial, industrial & civic/institutional uses. The Gi Couneil may, after- r i i _ -port and recommendation from the Planning aA conditional use permit for one or more businesses to provide the required off-street parking facilities by joint use of one or more sites where the total number of spaces provided are less than the sum of the total required for each business should they provide them separately. When considering a request for such a permit, the Planning Commission shall not recommend that such permit be granted nor the Council approve such a permit except when the following conditions are found to exist: (4) Cross parking facilities for commercial, industrial & civic/institutional uses. Adjoining business properties may allow cross parking and/or access if authorized by a Conditional Use per the requirements of Section 2.4(D) and subiect the following conditions: (a) The required island and landscaping requirements in e 153.060 are met. (b) The vehicular use area meets the required setback at the perimeter of the parcels in question. (c) The curb cut access locations to the parking loth are approved by the Ci . (d) A shared parking/access and maintenance agreement is provided by the parking owners and recorded against all subject properties. (e) A properly drawn legal instrument executed by the parties concerned for joint use of off-street parking facilities, duly approved as to form and manner of execution by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Citv Administrator and recorded with the Countv Recorder. SECTION 32. § Section 153.069 GRADING DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL is hereby amended to read as follows. (A) Purpose. (4) This chapter is intended to meet the current construction site erosion and sediment and waste control and post -construction stormwater management regulatory requirements for construction activity and small construction activity 43 (NPDES Permit) as defined in 40 CFR pt. 122.26(b)(14)(x) and (b)(15), respectively. (D) Grading, drainage, stormwater management, and erosion control plan requirements. Grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control plans are required for any activities that require a grading permit as defined in § 153.028(M). The plans shall contain the following information and be in conformance with the city's plan requirements and design guidelines ("design manual"): (5) A copy of the applicant's Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Permit for discharging stormwater from construction activity (MN R100001), if the area of disturbed land is equal to or greater than one acre or if' roiect meets the definition of common plan of development that covers one (1) acre or more.. A stormwater pollution prevention plan must be prepared and must meet the NPDES requirements and conform to the SVWPPP standards specified in the MPCA NPDES construction general permit (Permit No: MN R10001). SECTION 33. § 153.070 BUILDING MATERIALS is hereby amended to read as follows. (C) Residential district requirements. (1) All residence districts. No metal siding shall be permitted wider than 12 inches or without a one-half inch or more overlap and relief. (2) R-1 and R-2 Districts. A minimum of 15% of the front building fagade of any structure in the R-1 or R-2 Districts, less the square footage area of windows and garage doors, shall be covered with brick or stone. Any attached or major detached accessory building that can be seen from the street shall meet this same standard when consistent with the principal structure. Structures with front facades covered by at least 70% stucco or real wood may reduce the brick or stone coverage to 5%. The Planning Commission may approve optional fagade treatments prior to building permit throw plan review when additional architectural detailing so warrants. Such detailing may include usable front porches, extraordinary roof pitch or other features. (3) R -A and T -N Districts. A minimum of 20% of the front building fagade of any structure in the R -A or T -N zoning district, less the square footage area of the windows and garage doors, shall be covered with brick or stone. Any attached or major detached accessory building that can be seen from the street shall meet this same standard when consistent with the principal structure. Structures with front facades covered by at least 70% stucco or real wood may reduce the brick or stone coverage to 10%. (4) R-3 District and other districts with multiple family housing. A The R-3 and R-4 District and other districts with multiple -family housing shall be subject to building material standards as follows: (a) aAll building walls facing a public street shall be covered with stone, brick, cultured masonry simulating brick or stone, or other enhanced materials .,eeeptable to the City Gotmeil to an extent not less than 20% of the exposed wall silhouette area. In addition, (b) mMultiple-family structures of 13 or more units shall, when using lap horizontal siding, be constructed of heavy gauge steel or cement - board, with no use of vinyl or aluminum permitted. Natural wood or species that is resistant to decay may be permitted s.heFe approved by the (6) Building materials and design for the CCD District. All buildings within the CCD shall meet the materials and design standards of the Comprehensive Plan as defined by the Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan Amendment, the requirements of the CCD District, as well as the standards in § 153.07OLor Business District Requirements. In the case of a conflict between these standards, the stricter of the standards shall be annlied. SECTION 34. § 153.090 USE TABLE is hereby amended to read as follows. (A) Explanation of use table structure. (1) Organization of Table 5-1. Table 5-1 organizes all principal uses by use classifications and use types. (a) Use classifications. The use classifications are: agricultural uses; residential uses; civic and institutional uses; ^��se; commercial uses; and industrial uses. The use classifications provide a systematic basis for assigning present and future land uses into broad general classifications (e.g., residential and commercial uses). The use classifications then organize land uses and activities into specific "use types" based on common functional, product, or physical characteristics, such as the type and amount of activity, the type of customers or residents, how goods or services are sold or delivered and site conditions. TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base ZoningDistricts "P" = Permitted "C" = Additional Conditionally A R R R T R R M B B B B C P 1 1 1 Requirements Permitted O A 1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 B I 2 "I" = Interim D D Permitted CommercialE P P 77 lodging P � i Commercial C self -storage a Day care C C C P P C centers Financial P E P Institution P `A 45 Retail service P P P in the pointes SECTION 35. § 153.091 USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS is hereby amended to read as follows. (C) Regulations for residential uses. (2) Attached dwelling. (a) Regulations applicable to all attached dwelling types. (b) Duplex and Two -Family Dwellings (d) Multiple family. 4. If in the B-1, B-2 or CCD district, multiple -family units shall be in the form of apartments or condominiums located above the first floor of the building, unless otherwise authorized to be on the first floor by a conditional use permit meeting the following additional standards: a. The proposed site for residential use is consistent with the goals and objectives of the r,,,.,,.,t,.w Revitalization D'a" Ci 's Comprehensive Plan and detailed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment entitled "Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan " (4) Manufactured homes/manufactured home park. (b) Manufactured home parks. Development of new manufactured home parks shall be encouraged to use the planned unit development (PUD) process to allow the city to vary or modify the strict application and requirements for manufactured home parks to more readily accommodate this type of development. However, absent development through a PUD, the following requirements shall apply: 1. In general: b. Each designated mebileanufactured home site shall not be less than 2,500 sf. 8. Accessory Structures a. Accessory storage buildings serving the overall park and not an individual unit in manufactured home parks, if not reviewed .e and approved as part of a PUD, shall be conditionallypermitted subject to the following additional requirements: (i) The storage building and any accompanying outdoor storage area shall be for the sole use of the residents of the manufactured home park and shall not be used by non- residents. (ii) Accompanying outdoor storage areas shall befull screened from surrounding manufactured home units and adjacent properties. b. For individual residential units within a mobile or manufactured home park, the following standards shall apply: (i) Only one detached accessory structure, maior or minor, shall be allowed. (ii) The maximum area of a detached accessory structure shall be 300 square feet. (iii) The maximum height of the structure shall be 1 S' as measured at the median height of the roof (iv) The detached accessory structure may not be located between the front line of the residential unit and the park access road. (v) Such structure shall be located five (5) feet from any other structure. (vi) The location of accessory structures shall be permitted only with the permission of the manufactured home park owner. (vii) Detached accessory structures exceeding 300 square feet shall require authorization through conditional use permit, which shall be subject to the following requirements: A. Permission of the park owner. B. Detached accessory structure shall have access to the park road. C. No other detached accessory structure shall be permitted. D. The maximum heip_ht of the structure shall be 15' as measured at the median height of the roof 47 (D) Regulations for civic and institutional uses. (2) Assisted living facilities. (a) The development must be contained on an independent simile parcel; 30% of the parcel must be preserved as open space at least two-thirds of which shall be useable. (e) The site of the main epAr-anee of the prineipal use is seFved or- is loeated with, 400 feet o f f-e,.ula - transit (f) Efficiency units shall be a minimum floor area of 440 square feet, and shall not exceed 20% of the total number of apartments in a multiple dwelling, or the maximum established in the district, whichever is less. (4) Hospitals. A hospital shall: (a) Be located on a site of at least five acres. (b) Be located on a parcel that fronts or has direct access to an arterial or collector street. (c) Be served by public water and wastewater systems. (d)Side yards shall be double the minimum requirements established for the applicable district. (e)When abutting a residential use in a residential use district, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buf er Type "B ") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. (OAdequate of -street parking and access is provided in compliance with Section 4.8 of this ordinance and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section 4.1 LF) of this ordinance. (g)Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are considered and satisfactorily provided in accordance with Section 4.9 of this ordinance. (h)Exterior li hating standards outlined in Section 4.4 of this ordinance shall be met. (7) Public buildings or uses: (a) When abutting a residential use in a residential use district, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "B") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. (b) Conformity with the surrounding neighborhood is maintained and required setbacks and side yard requirements are met. (c) Adequate off-street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting the use in compliance with Section 4.8 of this ordinance and that such parking is adequately screened and M. landscaped from surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section 4.1 (F) of this ordinance. (d) Adequate of -street loading and service entrances are considered and satis actorily provided in accordance with Section 4.9 of this ordinance. (d e) Exterior lighting standards outlined in Section 4.4 of this ordinance .shall he met_ (E) Regulations for commercial uses. (1) Adult uses: See - 153.046UT) (2) Auction house. (m) All outside storage and outdoor sales and display, if allowed, shall be effectively screened from public view in accordance with § 153.060(I) and limited to 10% of the gross floor area of the principal use building. (3) Auto repair — minor. (b) Repair of all vehicles shall occur within an enclosed building. Temporary outdoor vehicle storage may be allowed in an outdoor storage area that is no larger than 25% of the buildable area of the lot, is located behind the front building line of the principal structure, and is screened with a wooden fence, maintenance free vinyl or masonry wall in accordance with § 153.062, Fences & Walls. (a When abutting a residential use, the property_shall be screened with at least a semi-opaque buffer in accordance with (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "C'� in accordance with .& 153.060Lq) of this ordinance. (4) Automotive wash facilities. �!U PWMM srs r m= ■ MM I M (7) Commercial lodging. (b) In the CCD District, the following additional standards shall apply: 1. The principal building lot coverage is no less than 50% of the property, exclusive of easements devoted to public pedestrian use or other outdoor public spaces. 2. The building, site, and signage meet the standards for the "CCD" District and designr-eview is eendueted by the Planning ceffifflissie . 3. The proposed use demonstrates compatibility and consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the T,,,w,,*,...,,, Revitalization P! as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment entitled `Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan. (11) Day care center. (d) In addition to divisions (a) through (c) above, day care centers in the IBC and I-1 district, shall adhere to the following additional requirements: (13) Entertainment/recreation — outdoor commercial. (a) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with at least a semi-opaque buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "C") in accordance with § 153.060(G). (b) Adequate measures to contain the proposed activity on the subject site shall be provided_ (c) Dust and noise are controlled consistent with Citv Ordinance. (d)No auctions shall take place on the premises. 50 (e)Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 AM -10: 00 PM. (0 All li hating shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of this ordinance. (17) Kennels (commercial): (a) The kennel shall be sufficiently insulated so no unreasonable noise or odor can be detected off the premises. (b) Any open runs or pens used to house animals shall be located at least 75 feet from any lot line. (c) Accessory uses to a kennel may include retail sales and grooming services, as long as the accessory uses do not occupy more than 25% of the total gross floor area of the principal building. (d) All kennels shall operate in conformance with Ciiy Code requirements and licensures. (18) Landscaping/nursery business. (a) The business shall be located next to a collector or arterial street as identified in the comprehensive plan, or otherwise located so that access to the site will not conduct significant traffic on local residential streets. (b) Exterior- displays visible from .,djaee t p „o, -ties o right of'.. ay shall. be lifnited t..plants , gloss other -wise appr-eved by the City Getineil. (20) Offices (commercial). Regulations for- ^ffi^e (a) Outdoor storage and Accessory Building — Maio r shall be prohibited. (21) Offices (professional) includingfinancial institutions. (a) Outdoor storage and Accessory Buildin—MMaior shall be prohibited. (22) Personal services. (a) Outdoor storage and Accessory Building — Maior shall be prohibited. (b) Drive-thru service shall require authorization through conditional use hermit in accordance with Section 5.2 of this ordinance. (25) Repair establishments. (a) Outdoor storage and Accessory Building — Major shall be prohibited. (26) Restaurants. (c) Restaurants having drive-through facilities shall require a conditional use permit and comply with the following standards: 7. If in the CCD District, the following standards shall also apply: a. The design of the site promotes pedestrian access adjacent to and along the property. 51 b. Site lighting shall utilize fixtures similar in style to that designated by the city for use in public areas of the "CCD" district. c. The building, site, and signage meet the standards for the "CCD" district and design review is conducted by the Planning Commission. d. Drive through facilities comply with the requirements of § 153.092(D)(14). e. The proposed use demonstrates compatibility and consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the 1,,.....,4,.w- Revitalization Plan as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment entitled "Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan. (27) Retail commercial uses (other). (a) If the retail sales includes consignment sales, the following standards shall apply: i Sales and storage shall not o oa 1,000 s o feet ; 2 At least 800 of the sales shall be ,.v,.,.nsigne mer-ehandise-. 31. No auctions shall take place on the premises. 42. There shall be no outside storage. (28) Specialty eating establishments. (a) Drive through service, if .,ppr-eve e within the pplie ble distfietl shall be reviewed through the conditional use permit process and shall be located to the side or rear of the building whenever feasible. (29) Vehicle fuel sales. (a) Regardless of whether the dispensing, sale, or offering for sale of motor fuels and/or oil is incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the standards and requirements imposed by this chapter for motor fuel stations shall apply. These standards and requirements are, however, in addition to other requirements which are imposed for other uses of the property. (b)A principal buildingis wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, which square footage shall be a minimum of 10% of the total lot area. (b c) Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. (e d) All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in compliance with § 153.064. (d d) Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. 52 (el) If in the CCD District, the following standards shall also apply: 1. The design of the site promotes pedestrian access adjacent to and along the property. 2. No more than two curb cuts of 24 feet in width or less shall be permitted. 3. Site lighting shall utilize fixtures similar in style to that designated by the city for use in public areas of the "CCD" district. 4. The building, site, and signage meet the standards for the "CCD" district and design review is conducted by the Planning Commission. 5. The proposed use demonstrates compatibility and consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the r,owni,,,,,,, Revitalization Planas detailed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment entitled "Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan". (30) Vehicle sales or rental. (g) There is a minimum lot area of 22,500 square feet and minimum lot dimensions of 150 feet by 130 feet. ^ drainage system subjeet to the approval of the Community Development Department shall be installed. (h) A drainage system subject to the approval of the Community Development Department shall be installed. (F) Regulations for industrial uses. (1) Automobile repair - major. (g) The advet4ising wall f4eing the publie right of way shall eensist of no more than 500% metal material. monotony of a single eoler- flat sur-faee-. (3) Commercial self -storage facilities. (a) Site layout. 1. The minimum lot area shall be at least two acres. 2. If separate buildings are constructed, there shall be a minimum separation of ten feet between buildings and shall be authorized through establishment of a planned unit development. 53 (11) Machinery/trucking repair & sales and ind- trig' (14) Recycling and salvage center. (c) Except for a freestanding office, no part of the center shall be located within 4725 feet of any property line, or the minimum buffer yard setbacks required in § 153.060(G), whichever requires the greater setback. SECTION 36. § 153.091 USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS, Division (F) Regulations for industrial uses is hereby amended to add the following subsection and renumber sections accordingly. (8) Industrial services. (a) The entire site other than that taken up by a building, structure, or plantings _ shall be paved. (b) A drainage system subject to the approval of the Community Development Department shall be installed. (c) The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the public right-of-way and shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of this ordinance. (d) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with an opaque buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "D") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. (e) Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting properties and the public right of way in compliance with Section 4.1(F) of this ordinance. (f) All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in compliance with Section 4.5 of this ordinance. 54 (g) Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. (h) No outside storagept as permitted or conditionally_ permitted in compliance with Section 5.3(D)(26) of this ordinance. (i) If the business requires the use of large commercial vehicles or other large machinery, a specific area shall be designated for the exterior storage of the vehicles and equipment. SECTION 37. § 153.092 ACCESSORY USE STANDARDS is hereby amended as follows: (B) General standards and limitations for accessory uses and structures. (2) General standards. All accessory uses and accessory structures shall meet the following standards: (a) Directly serve the principal use or structure; (b) Be customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to the principal use and structure; (c) Be subordinate in area, extent, and purpose to the principal use or structure; (d) Be owned or operated by the same person as the principal use or structure; (e) Be located on the same lot as the principal use or structure, subject to the public improvement project exception as regulated by § 153.106(D)(1); (f) Not be constructed or established prior to the time the principal use or structure is constructed or established, subject to the public improvement project exception as regulated by § 153.106(D)(1); (g) Together with the principal use or structure, not violate any standards of this chapter; (h) Not be located within platted or recorded easements or over underground public utilities without an encroachment akreement issued by the Community Development Department; (i) An accessory building shall be considered an integral part of the principal building if it is connected to the principal building either directly or by an enclosed passageway. Such accessory buildings shall adhere to requirements for the principal building; 0) If a principal building is proposed to be removed with no immediate replacement, all accessory structures shall also be removed; 55 (k) Not constitute a combination use, which is the combination of two principal uses (combination uses will not meet the above standards in terms of being subordinate or providing service to the principal use). SECTION 38. § 153.092 ACCESSORY USE STANDARDS, TABLE 5-4: ACCESSORY USES & STRUCTURES is hereby amended as follows: TABLE 5-4: ACCESSORY USES & STRUCTURES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base ZoningDistricts "P" = Permitted "C" = Additional Conditionally A R R R T R R M B B B B C P I I I Requirements Permitted O A 1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 1 2 "I" = Interim D D C Permitted Drive-through g g g P P P §153.092(D)(14) C services C C C a C C C Office P P P P P P P P_ none Outdoor P P P P P P P P P P Residential storage / / § 153.092(D)(27) C C (a) Industrial § 153.092(D)(27) b Sidewalk Ca e P P P P City Code SECTION 39. § 153.092 ACCESSORY USE STANDARDS is hereby amended as follows: (D) Additional specific standards for certain accessory uses. (2) Accessory building — major. (a) In all residential districts except M -H, the following shall apply: 2. Private garages. a. Private garages shall be used by the family or families residing upon the premises, except as follows: (i) One-half of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non- commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if sufficient off-street parking in full compliance with this chapter is provided elsewhere on the property. 56 (b) In the M -H district, the folio of§ 153.091 (C)(4 ) (8) shall apply.: tl�NA0.1eAlrlAIINl��91NNAl1iMMrII�II�A (35) Trash handling and recycling collection area. (a) Multiple -family structures with more than four dwelling units shall adhere to the following: 1. All large trash handling and recycling collection area(s) shall be: located within the principal structure and be totally screened from public view by the principal building SECTION 40. § 153.092 ACCESSORY USE STANDARDS, TABLE 5-5 REQUIRED STACKING SPACES FOR DRIVE-THRUS is hereby amended as follows: TABLE 5-5: REQUIRED STACKING SPACES FOR DRIVE-THROUGHS Use or Activity [ 1 ] Minimum number of Stacking Spaces (per lane Measured From [2] Specialty Eating Establishments - Coffee 12 Window shops Restaurants -5 8 per order board Pick-up window 57 SECTION 41. § 153.092 ACCESSORY USE STANDARDS is hereby amended to add the following subsection and subsequent subsections shall be reordered accordingly. (31) Sidewalk Cafe (a) Sidewalk cafes shall be subject to the requirements of City Code, Chapter SECTION 42. § 153.093 TEMPORARY USE STANDARDS is hereby amended as follows: (C) General standards for temporary uses. Temporary uses, structures, or events shall comply with the following: (1) Obtain the appropriate permits (as required), including the signature of the property owner on which the temporary use is proposed; (E) Specific standards for temporary uses. (6) Temporary storage in a portable shipping container. Temporary storage in a portable shipping container shall be permitted to serve an existing use subject to the following standards. (a) For residential uses, a portable shipping container shall not be located: 1. On a lot without prior approval from the Community Development Department; 2 in ^ ,.o, uir-e (tont .,^,.a On an unimproved or unpaved surface; 3. Within ten feet of any lot line or structure; 4. In a manner that impedes ingress, egress, or emergency access; and 5. On an individual parcel or site for more than 30 total days over any one-year period. (7) Tents, canopies, tarp garages, and hoop buildings. Tents, canopies, tarp garages, and hoop buildings or similar membrane structures shall: (a) Obtain a building permit from the Community Development Department; (b) Maintain a minimum clearance of -29 6 feet from all other structures and tents; (c) Not exceed more than two one on a single parcel (the Community Development Department may approve more than two as a part of a special event permit on a single parcel ; W. (d) Not be erected for more than a total of 30 days in any calendar year with the exception of those uses with valid permits issued under § 153.093(E)(8) through (11); (e) Be limited to a maximum of three occurrences per parcel per year; (f) Not be placed within required landscape areas; (g) Not obstruct emergency vehicle access to adjacent lots or disrupt pedestrian circulation; and (h) The lot or site shall be restored to its original condition within two days of removal of the tent, canopy, tarp garage, or hoop building. SECTION 43. § 153.106 AUTHORITY TO CONTINUE is hereby amended to read as follows: (A) Legally conforming existing structures and uses in existence on the effective date of this chapter as denoted in § 153.004 which become nonconforming to this chapter shall be considered legally nonconforming and shall be treated as follows: (1) A use which is no longer permitted due to a change in zoning shall be considered a legally nonconforming use subject to all conditions for such use as outlined in this chapter, and shall not be expanded, except that legally nonconforming owner -occupied residential uses may be expanded to improve livability, provided the expansion meets all other applicable conditions of the zoning district in which the residential use is located and does not increase any existing nonconforming condition on the property, including the number of residential units in a building. (2) A structure which becomes nonconforming to a required setback or setbacks shall be viewed as a legally nonconforming structure, subject to all conditions for such structure as outlined in this ordinance, and may be continued, including through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance, or improvement, but not including expansion, except as allowed by paragraph H below. SECTION 44. § 153.124 ENFORCEMENT GENERALLY is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) General inspections. (2) If the owner, licensee, resident, or other person in control of a premises objects to the inspection of or entrance to the property, the Community Development Department may petition a court of competent jurisdiction for a search warrant to authorize entrance to the property. Such a warrant shall only be used to determine whether the provisions of this chapter or related state statute are being complied with and to enforce this chapter or related state statute. No unrelated criminal charges shall be made as a result of the warrant. No warrant shall be issued unless there is probable cause to issue the warrant. Probable cause W occurs if the search is reasonable. Probable cause does not depend on specific knowledge of the condition of a particular property. SECTION 45. § 153.999 PENALTY is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) The city may also enforce any provision of this chapter by mandamus, injunction, or any other appropriate remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. No related city permit, license or other approval will be issued to a person or property that has an outstanding notice of violation that is not beim appealed, or is not subject to the provisions of a stipulation, order or settlement re,zarding that violation. SECTION 46. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Chapter 153, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. SECTION 47. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hal Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor A rrrrr, carr. AYES: Gabler, Hilgart, Hinz, Martie, and Murdoff NAYS: None ORDINANCE NO. 803 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE XV OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE MONTICELLO OFFICAL ZONING MAP BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM 1-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO IBC, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS DISTRICT Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Park PID: 155-038-001050 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended by rezoning of Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Park (PID: 155-038-001050) from 1-1, Light Industrial District to IBC, Industrial Business Campus Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make any changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Chapter XV Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process and map amendment, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 27th day of March, 2023. Lloyd Hilgart, ayor ATTEST: r Jeq-nifer S eib JrCity Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 803 AYES:Gabler, Hilgart, Martie, and Murdoff NAYS: None. Absent: Hinz ORDINANCE NO. 816 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 153 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE GREAT RIVER PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO PUD, GREAT RIVER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREAT RIVER SECOND ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section §153.047 — Planned Unit Developments, is hereby amended by adding the following: (_xx_) Great River PUD District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Great River PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for multi -family residential land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Great River PUD District shall be multiple family residential uses on the subject property, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated November 11, 2023, and development agreement dated , 2023, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district shall be reviewed under the requirements of §153.028 (0) - Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to the various residential uses, as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. For the Great River PUD, storage and keeping of commercial vehicles, equipment, and related materials of residents of the district shall be an allowed accessory use within detached garage spaces as approved on the Final Stage PUD plans. No such storage or equipment shall be permitted within the principal residential structure. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Great River PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. (e) In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by ORDINANCE NO. 816 the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the R-4 Residential District shall apply. (f) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the §153.028(0)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B-3, Highway Business District to PUD, Great River Planned Unit Development District: Lot 1, Block 1, Great River Second Addition Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section S. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 13th day of November, 2023 ATTEST: Ji nnifer0_ierg,Citdy!�Ierk AYES:Gabler, Hinz, Martie and Murdoff NAYS: Hilgart 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 1/02/24 3A. Consideration to adopt the 2024-2025 Planning Commission Workplan Update Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Community Development Director 1/02/2024 Commission action): NA Additional Analysis by: Community & Economic Development Coordinator ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt the 2024-2025 Planning Commission Workplan Update. 2. Motion of other. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Staff is requesting that the Planning Commission review the 2024-2025 Planning Commission Workplan for adoption. The purpose of the Planning Commission Workplan is to connect the work of the Commission to the overall goals of the City and community. The Workplan outlines activities of the Commission which lie beyond its required review of land use applications. Staff has updated the Workplan based on prior feedback and ideas of the Commission, priorities from the 2040 Vision + Plan, as well as ordinance amendment work resulting from recent legislative action. STAFF RECOMMENDATION None. SUPPORTING DATA A. 2024-2025 Workplan, Draft B. 2023-2025 Workplan Progress Update 1 CITY OF Monticello Monticello Planning Commission 2021-2025 Workplan 2024 UPDATE The Monticello Planning Commission is established to advise the Mayor, Council and Community Development Department in matters concerning planning and land use matters; to review and make recommendations regarding the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan, subdivision and zoning ordinances and other planning rules and regulations; to establish planning rules and regulations; and to conduct public hearings. Purpose Statement: The Planning Commission will support efforts to implement the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The Planning Commission will work collaboratively with the City Council, other City boards and commissions, and community stakeholders in its work to achieve the Plan and the strategic goals of the city. Organizational & Training Activities: • League of Minnesota Cities training o Land Use Mini Course - Land Use (Mini -Course) - League of Minnesota Cities (Imc.org) o Land Use Regulation: Your Role in Land -Use Decision Making - Land Use Regulation: Your Role in Land -Use Decision Making - LeaRue of Minnesota Cities (Imc.ore) • Continue to support regional planning as identified by the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. o Implementation Chapter -Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 1.10.1- Consider the outcomes of regional planning initiatives and participate in processes resulting from the efforts of the Central Mississippi River Regional Partnership. • Consistent with Policy 1.2 for Agency Coordination, monitor opportunity for engagement in roadway and pathway connectivity planning across jurisdictions, including the current Planning and Environmental Linkage study. • Initiate and/or facilitate organizational projects in support of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. o Implementation Chapter - Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 1.1.1 - Facilitate biannual meetings to serve as a "Development Forum" with interested property owners, realtors, builders and developers to discuss long-term planning, real estate market conditions. • Pending outcomes of a 2024 City Housing Workshop, facilitate a housing forum with builders and developers. 11 Page Comprehensive Plan Activities: • Support the implementation of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan through implementation of the Goals, Policies and Strategies identified within the Plan. o Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation Chapter ■ Review Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation Goals from Chapter 3 of the 2040 Plan. ■ Participate in a Council and Commission workshop on the amended Orderly Annexation Agreement. ■ Residential Land Uses • As needed following the 2024 Housing Policy Workshop, consider amendments in the Goals, Policies and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan, as well as the Future Land Use Map. o Economic Development Chapter ■ Review industrial land inventory and planning consistent with Monticello 2040 Land Use policies for industrial land use, including: • Policies 1.1 (Land Use) and 8.1 (Economic Development) - Opportunity Areas • Policy 1.2 - Growth Management (Land Use) • Policy 5.1 - Land Supply and Employment Growth (Land Use) • Policy 2.1 - Diverse Economic Sectors (Economic Development) • Policy 2.4 — Industrial and Business Site Analysis and Availability (Economic Development) • Continue to support the priority projects set by the City Council, including The Pointes at Cedar and reinvestment in Downtown Monticello. Small Area Plans for both projects are adopted as Appendices to the 2040 Plan. Zoning Ordinance/Map Activities: • With City Council, establish City policy related to recent cannabis legislation, adopting the necessary amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. • Consider amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and Official Zoning Map in support of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan guided land use, including, but not limited to the following. Evaluation of Zoning Map: ■ CCD and its Sub -Districts Evaluation of the following Zoning Code sections: ■ Floor area ratio requirements for commercial, industrial zoning districts ■ Impervious surface requirements for residential districts ■ Updating noise standards for more practical enforcement ■ Evaluation of regulation on short term rentals ■ Evaluation of the need for both B-3 and B-4 Districts ■ Evaluation of temporary use permits for portable container retail/specialty eating establishments 21 Page Subdivision Ordinance Activities: • Complete a review and amendment of the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance, including consideration of amendments as recommended in the Goals, Policies and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan as follows. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 2.5.1- Implement measures to slow down or "calm" traffic on local streets by using design techniques and measures to improve traffic safety, provide eyes on the street, and enhance the quality of life in Monticello's neighborhoods. ■ Strategy 3.8.2 - Require pedestrian and bike connections in new commercial development. • Strategy 6.5.1- Conduct regular review of parkland allocation and ensure sufficient amount of land is designated for parks and recreation activities in the City as the population increases. Research & City Department Update Topics As resources and time allow, the Planning Commission will consider research and information related to the following topic areas. Topic Annexation Process Sacred Settlements (2023 Legislative change) Policy and decision-making — City Board and Commission authority discussion Review actions and next steps for East Bertram Planning Area and Northwest Planning Areas identified in the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan 31 Page CITY 1OF Monticello Monticello Planning Commission 2021-2025 Workplan 2023 PROGRESS UPDATE The Monticello Planning Commission is established to advise the Mayor, Council and Community Development Department in matters concerning planning and land use matters; to review and make recommendations regarding the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan, subdivision and zoning ordinances and other planning rules and regulations; to establish planning rules and regulations; and to conduct public hearings. Purpose Statement: The Planning Commission will support efforts to implement the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The Planning Commission will work collaboratively with the City Council, other City boards and commissions, and community stakeholders in its work to achieve the Plan and the strategic goals of the city. Organizational & Training Activities: • Continue to support regional planning as identified by the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 1.10.1- Consider the outcomes of regional planning initiatives and participate in processes resulting from the efforts of the Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership. • Consistent with Policy 1.2 for Agency Coordination, monitor opportunity for engagement in roadway and pathway connectivity planning across jurisdictions. 2023 Progress Update: Planning Commission has the opportunity to participate in current engagement in the Planning & Environmental Linkage (PEL) study occurring for the region. The PEL evaluates transportation opportunity in the Highway 25 corridor area. Highway 25 Area PEL Study (arcgis.com) • Initiate and/or facilitate organizational projects in support of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 1.1.1 - Facilitate biannual meetings to serve as a "Development Forum" with interested property owners, realtors, builders and developers to discuss long-term planning, real estate market conditions. 2023 Progress Update: Not complete. A 2024 housing policy workshop with Planning Commission, EDA and City Council is planned to develop housing strategies for the community, using information from the 2023 Housing Study update. Development Forums would be best timed to follow these policy discussions. A housing forum with builders and developers would be a first priority. 11 Page Comprehensive Plan Activities: • Support the implementation of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan through implementation of the Goals, Policies and Strategies identified within the Plan. o Review industrial land inventory and planning consistent with Monticello 2040 Land Use policies for industrial land use, including: ■ Policies 1.1 (Land Use) and 8.1 (Economic Development) - Opportunity Areas ■ Policy 1.2 - Growth Management (Land Use) ■ Policy 5.1 - Land Supply and Employment Growth (Land Use) ■ Policy 2.1 - Diverse Economic Sectors (Economic Development) ■ Policy 2.4 — Industrial and Business Site Analysis and Availability (Economic Development) 2023 Progress update: Not complete. EDA and Council are currently working on setting their land holding development priorities. A Commission workshop to review their discussions, including industrial land holdings and development is planned for early 2024. • Support the priority projects set by the City Council, including the small area planning for Chelsea Commons (now The Pointes at Cedar) area and reinvestment in Block 52 in Downtown Monticello. 2023 Progress Update: Pointes zoning ordinance adopted in 2022; no private development projects in the area were proposed in 2023 under the new ordinance. Block 52 private and public projects underway. Zoning Ordinance/Map Activities: Complete the recodification of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, including consideration of amendments as recommended in the Goals, Policies and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2023 Status Update: Complete. • Consider amendments to the Monticello Official Zoning Map in support of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan guided land use, including, but not limited to the following. Evaluation of the following Zoning Code sections: ■ Floor area ratio requirements for commercial, industrial zoning districts ■ Impervious surface requirements for residential districts ■ Updating noise standards for more practical enforcement ■ Evaluation of regulation on short term rentals ■ Evaluation of the need for both B-3 and B-4 Districts ■ Evaluation of temporary use permits for portable container retail/specialty eating establishments ■ Incorporation of electric vehicle standards — functional as an accessory use Complete 2023 Status Update: Amendment of residential district standards also completed, reducing area requirements in the T -N district for by -right smaller lot development. Minor amendments to the 21 Page R-2, R-3 and R-4 zoning standards. Commission should advise as to whether the other noted ordinance sections are still of interest for future amendment. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 2.7.1 - Amend the Zoning Map to be consistent with the Future Land Use Map and identify areas where mixed -density residential uses are appropriate. 2023 Status Update: Action to rezone has occurred only as a result of consideration of individual land use applications. Subdivision Ordinance Activities: • Complete a review and amendment of the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance, including consideration of amendments as recommended in the Goals, Policies and Strategies of the Implementation Chapter of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan as follows. o Implementation Chapter, Land Use, Growth & Orderly Annexation ■ Strategy 2.5.1 - Implement measures to slow down or "calm" traffic on local streets by using design techniques and measures to improve traffic safety, provide eyes on the street, and enhance the quality of life in Monticello's neighborhoods. Strategy 3.8.2 - Require pedestrian and bike connections in new commercial development. Strategy 6.5.1- Conduct regular review of parkland allocation and ensure sufficient amount of land is designated for parks and recreation activities in the City as the population increases. 2023 Status Update: The City has been consistent in ensuring that new commercial developments install pedestrian and bike pathways, further promoting connectivity throughout the City's transportation system. These connections are in addition to those required as part of sidewalk requirements and park dedication for residential development. Park dedication has been required per ordinance and PARC recommendations for all new residential developments. The City is also currently completing two planning efforts which will support work in these strategy areas. Safe Streets 4 All: With grant funding from this federal program, Monticello is completing a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan. The Action Plan will identify roadway improvements to increase multi -modal transportation safety with the goal of eliminating serious injury and fatality accidents. The plan will also identify policy and process changes (including any recommendations for the subdivision ordinance) the City can implement with an emphasis on strategies and projects that enhance safety throughout the City. Parks Needs Assessment & Master Plan: The City has completed a Parks Needs Assessment which reflects and prioritizes community needs, evaluates the existing and needed park elements, and reviews system infrastructure condition. The completed assessment will now be used to support development of a Park Master Plan. The Master Plan is intended to be a robust document that can guide maintenance and development of the parks system over the next 15+ years. It will identify and prioritize future capital improvements, planning, programming, and initiatives. The 31 Page Commission will be asked to participate in engagement related to the Plan's development. Once the Master Plan is complete, it will serve as the foundation for a park dedication analysis. Research & City Department Update Topics As resources and time allow, the Planning Commission will consider research and information related to the following topic areas. Topic Annexation Process - 2024 Transportation and CIP Update — including CMRP update and traffic study overview - Annual Land Use Basics overview (consider joint session with Council) - Complete Policy and decision-making — City Board and Commission authority discussion - 2024 Overview of Economic Development initiatives for business retention and employment attraction - Complete Status of municipal infrastructure - Annual Home Occupation permitting - Complete Discuss next steps for East Bertram Planning Area and Northwest Planning Areas identified in Monti 2040-2024 41 Page Planning Commission Agenda —1/02/24 4A. Community Development Director's Report Council Action on/related to Commission Recommendations • Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.091— Use Specific Standards, to allow for a single industrial self -storage facility to be built on a parcel less than two acres, and allow for such individual units to be divided into spaces of at least 1,500 square feet in industrial districts, and including definitions or other regulations necessary to define and limit the intent or application of the proposed amendment. Applicant: Skylar Rekstad Approved on the December 11, 2023 City Council consent agenda. • Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide two parcels from Mixed -Density Residential and Mixed Neighborhood to Public and Institutional, Rezoning from A -O, Agriculture Open Space District to Planned Unit Development (PUD) District, Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD for a proposed municipal Public Works facility. Applicant: City of Monticello Approved on the December 11, 2023 City Council consent agenda. Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park Economic Impact The University of Minnesota has completed a 2023 economic impact analysis to quantify the economic impact of the BCOL Regional Athletic Park on the Monticello community. During the summer of 2023, volunteers trained by the University of Minnesota collected over 250 user surveys at the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. The survey was developed specific to Monticello and Bertram in a collaborative effort between the experts at the U of M Tourism Center and the Parks & Recreation and Community & Economic Development staff. The full U of M report is attached. A summary of findings can be found in the Council agenda. 817 (monticello.mn.us) Upcoming Workshops Planning Commission is asked to mark their calendar for an upcoming joint workshop with the City Council and Economic Development Authority on Monday, February 12 at 4:45 PM. The workshop will focus on the 2023 Housing Study Update and housing policy development. Planning Commission is asked to review the Housing Study in order to be prepared for the workshop. A hard copy will be provided to the Commission at the January meeting. In addition, Commission is asked to complete the attached Housing Priorities worksheet. In addition, a joint Planning Commission and Council update on progress on cannabis Planning Commission Agenda —1/02/24 ordinance development is planned for March. The City is waiting for additional information from Wright County on their amendments. EDA Property Workshop The EDA held a recent workshop to review its property holdings and discuss intended uses and next steps. The summary is attached for reference. City Council may hold a similar workshop for its holdings in the future. 2024 City Budget and Levy The City Council has adopted the 2024 Levy and Budget. Finance Director Sarah Rathlisberger's overview presentations of both items are very informative: City Council 12/11/23 (viebit.com) Project Update List January's updated project listing is attached. 2 Economic impact of Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park event attendees, 2023 Prepared by Brigid Tuck, October 2023 Overview The City of Monticello, in partnership with Wright County, created the 1,200 -acre Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. The park has many activities and amenities, including trails for mountain biking, skiing, hiking, and walking, an amphitheater, fishing pier, campground, and swimming beach. In addition, Monticello is in the process of developing an athletic park. Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park is situated on 120 acres and offers 22 soccer fields, seven lacrosse fields, and 10 football fields. The fields are youth to international sized and are natural grass fields. Two of the soccer fields are championship -level fields. Other amenities at the athletic park include walking trails, potable water services, and on-site parking. The athletic park opened in 2012 and is operated by Monticello's Parks and Recreation Department. The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park attracts visitors from across Minnesota to events held on-site, introducing Monticello to the sports tourism market. Sports tourism is a growing segment of the tourism economy. Nationally, the number of sports tourists increased by nearly 6 percent between 2015 and 2019. During the same period, spending by sports travelers, event organizers, and venues increased by almost 17 percent.' Sports tourists include amateur adult and youth plus collegiate tournament participants. The City of Monticello was interested in understanding how sports tourism related to the Bertram Chain of Lakes athletic fields impacts the city's economy. University of Minnesota Extension's economic impact analysis team collaborated with the city to design a project. The goal of this project was to answer the following questions: • How much do sports tourists spend in the community during their visit? • Which businesses directly benefit from sports tourists? CITY OF • Which businesses indirectly benefit from • sports tourists? 4MonticeRo • What opportunities exist to increase the economic benefits of sports tourism in Monticello? To reach these goals, volunteers with the City of Monticello surveyed attendees at events held during June and July of 2023. In total, volunteers collected 250 usable surveys. Events included a mix of soccer and lacrosse that were held on various days throughout the week. During this period, the games were primarily league matches; there were no state or regional tournaments held. Role of Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park in Driving Visits Athletic events draw people to Monticello. Eight of every 10 people at Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park athletic events were primarily there to attend an event (Chart 1). Chart 1: Athletic Event Primary Reason for Travel to Monticello, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 No 15% 1141V Yes 85 Most survey respondents lived outside Monticello. Nearly three of every four respondents indicated they did not live in the 55362 zip code (Chart 2). Chart 2: Local Residents versus Visitors, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Live in 553E 28 sitor 2% Many of the athletic event attendees had visited Monticello prior to the event (Chart 3). Chart 3: Prior Visitor to Monticello, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 No 12% PA Yes 88% Athletic events drive current visits to Monticello. They are also driving future trips. Most people (88 percent) are likely to return to Monticello in the future (Chart 4). Chart 4: Likelihood of a Return Trip to Monticello, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Extremely likely 115 Somewhat likely 41 Neither likely nor unlikely d 19 Extremely unlikely 14 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Number of respondents 3 More than half (56 percent) of survey respondents planned to return for another athletic event. Other main reasons for return visits included shopping and another visit to Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park (Chart 5). Chart 5: Main Reason(s) for Return to Monticello, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Another athletic event Shopping Another visit to Bertram 59 Dining 56 Sightseeing/Recreation LMMM, 32 Other = 22 0 20 40 60 66 140 80 100 120 140 160 Number of respondents Mobile analytics data can provide insight into the visitor journey. Data from Placer.ai, which tracks cell phone movements, shows that most visitors to the athletic fields come directly from home (78.5 percent), followed by nature/landmarks (mostly other places in the park), work, superstores, and restaurants (Chart 6). Following the event, many return home. However, 18.6 percent go to other nature and landmarks. A deeper dive into the data shows 17.3 percent go to another location within Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, further demonstrating how the athletic fields bring people to the park. Chart 6: Visitor Journey, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Field Visitors Prior Home Nature& Landmarks Work Superstores Fast Food & QSR 78.5% 65.4% 5.1% 18.6% 2.8% 5.8% 2.2% 2.390 1.6% 1i.7% Post Home Nature & Landmarks Fast Food & Q5R Restaurants Superstores 4 Only a handful of athletic event attendees spent the night in Monticello (Chart 7). The number of overnight visitors will likely vary from year to year, depending on the type of events hosted at Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. Weekday soccer games tend to attract fewer overnight guests, while larger events, like state tournaments, attract higher numbers. Chart 7: Spent the Night Away from Home, Bertram Chain of Lakes Event Attendees, 2023 Yes 5% 11 No 95% The primary reason people did not spend the night in Monticello was due to the nature of the event they attended. Many people attended a one -day event and chose to make the drive to/from the event the same day. Another large portion of the survey respondents lived close enough to drive back and forth (Chart 8). Chart 8: Reasons for Not Staying the Night in Monticello, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 One -day event 90 Live close enough to drive 81 Stayed near family/friends 3 Limited hotel availability 12 0 20 40 60 80 100 Number of respondents 5 Survey respondents enjoyed Bertram Chain of Lakes activities and amenities. The quality of the athletic events and being outdoors (both attributes of the park) were the items that survey respondents indicated they enjoyed most about their trip to Monticello (Chart 9). Chart 9: Most Enjoyable Aspects of the Trip, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Quality of the athletic events Being outdoors Activities/amenities of Bertram Dining options Location in relation to the Twin Cities Customer service in the community Things to do in Monticello 108 M 108 37 - 26 - 23 _ 19 _ 19 Other 8 Hotel accommodations 1 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Number of respondents While survey respondents enjoy Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, there is room to increase use of other activities and amenities in the park. Roughly two of every three people did not visit another part of the park beyond the athletic fields (Chart 10). Chart 10: Aware of Park Amenities Beyond Athletic Fields, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Yes 38% No 62 6 Awareness of and Satisfaction with Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park For those aware of other activities at Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, the highest level of awareness was for swimming and the trails (Chart 11). Chart 11: Aware of Specific Activities at the Park, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Swimming , Trails ' Camping Mountain biking Kayaking Other . 17 0 155 151 119 104 97 50 100 150 200 Number of respondents Overall, attendees of Bertram Chain of Lakes athletic events were satisfied with the facilities (Chart 12). Chart 12: Satisfaction with Park Facilities, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Extremely satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 6 Extremely dissatisfied I 2 0 M 136 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Number of respondents 7 While overwhelmingly satisfied with the facilities, when provided a list of items they would like to see improved, respondents most commonly selected "amenities" (Chart 13). Amenities included restrooms, access to water, and concessions, among other items. Chart 13: Items to Improve at the Park, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Amenities (restrooms etc.) 115 Parking 59 Other, please specify - 18 Pathway connections ■ 11 Field quality 09 Visitor information for planning , 6 Assistance 12 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Number of respondents Survey respondents were invited to share suggestions via an open-ended question. Bathrooms received the highest number of suggestions (Chart 14). Attendees were interested in bathrooms located in a shelter with running water. There were also suggestions to have bathrooms at additional locations around the athletic facilities to get them closer to the fields. Concessions also received a significant number of nominations. Chart 14: Open -Ended Suggestions for Improvements to Park Facilities, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 (responses with more than one response) Bathrooms (running water/more sites) Concessions Expanded water park/splash pad Additional/paved/closer parking Playground Shade Walkways/paved trails Signs for each field/better labeling Water bottle filling station Pavilions Bleacher seats Baseball fields Pickleball Visitor information for planning Hockey rink Football field Tent camping 37 21 14 14 12 - 10 7 6 5 4 4 4 2 2 � 2 2 Number of responses 2 0 10 20 30 40 8 There were a variety of ideas listed only once. These included a maze, an AED device, basketball hoops, volleyball nets, a driving range, beer, gardens, hiking, tables, recycling, a tennis court, and skate ramps. Party Size and Traveler Spending The number of people traveling to Monticello per travel party ranged, but most of the survey respondents came in parties of two to four people (Chart 15). The average across all survey respondents was 3.5 people. Chart 15: Number of People Per Travel Party, Bertram Chain of Lakes Event Attendees, 2023 1 person I = 11 2 people L 48 3 people 40 4 people 48 5 people 23 More than 5 13 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Number of respondents By and large, respondents reported one to two of the people in their travel party participated in events at Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park (Chart 16). Those indicating "no one" included respondents such as grandparents who traveled separately to watch their grandchildren. The average across all respondents was 1.7 people. Chart 16: Number of People in Travel Party Participating in Event, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 No one 06 1 person i 120 2 people �� 43 3 people 13 4 people 11 5 people 3 More than 5 . 6 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Number of respondents 9 Economic Contribution of Athletic Events, Summer 2023 Economic impact includes direct, indirect, and induced effects. Direct effects are the initial change in the economy. For events, this is spending by attendees. It includes spending both at the event and at other businesses around the community. Indirect and induced effects are the economic activity generated at businesses throughout the region, even if they do not have visitors from the event. For example, soccer fans may not visit a local accountant, but that accountant might have a client who serves soccer fans at their business. Direct Effects: Visitor Spending For event economic impact studies, the analyst calculates the direct effect by multiplying the number of visitors by per person spending. The next section explains how Extension estimated the two components for this analysis. Number of Visitors For some situations, determining the number of visitors is simple. Ticketed events, for example, make it easy to track the number of people in attendance. Events with open gates (like youth soccer games), however, make attendance harder to measure. To measure the number of visitors at Bertram Chain of Lakes athletic events, Extension started with a list of events held throughout the summer. Events included soccer, lacrosse, and ultimate disc golf (Table 1). Table 1: Number of Attendees of Athletic Events at Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, Summer 2023 Number Players Attendees Per Local Visiting Total of Events Per Player Attendees Attendees Attendees Soccer Team 10 and Under 15 9 2.5 338 338 676 12 and Under 14 11 2.5 385 385 770 14 and Under 6 13 2.5 195 195 390 16 and Under 3 13 2.5 98 98 196 Unknown 5 11 2.5 138 138 276 Youth jamboree 550 total 2.5 688 688 1,376 Lacrosse 8 and Under 3 12 2.5 90 90 180 12 and Under 6 12 2.5 180 180 360 14 and Under 2 12 2.5 60 60 120 Ultimate Disc Golf Adult 3 40 2.5 0 300 300 Total 2,170 2,470 4,640 From there, Extension estimated how many players would travel with a team. For example, a U16 soccer team has 11 players on the field at a time. It's likely additional kids are "on the bench," so Extension assumed the team carried the players on the field plus two additional players for each team (home and away). The survey data shows 2.5 people travelled per player. Therefore, for a single U16 team, there would be 33 people in attendance. There were also two major events in 10 M which Monticello provided total player figures — a soccer jamboree and three ultimate disc tournaments. Based on this approach, Extension estimates 4,640 people attended activities at the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park athletic fields in the summer of 2023. Spending per Person Spending per person came from the attendee surveys. On average, attendees of athletic events at Bertram who do not live within the zip code spent $ 50.34 per day per person to attend their events (Table 2). In comparison, attendees from Monticello spent, on average, $38.30. Table 2: Average Spending Per Day Per Person, Monticello Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Events Attendees, 2023 Category Visitors Residents Lodging $0.04 $0 Transportation $11.30 $5.10 Shopping $11.90 $2.70 Groceries $10.10 $3.10 Dining Out $8.40 $1.60 Recreation/Attractions $1.50 $0 Athletic -related $6.20 $24.70 Misc. $0.90 $1.10 Total $50.34 $38.30 Given the number of attendees and the spending profiles, Bertram Chain of Lakes athletic event attendees spent an estimated $218,323 during summer 2023 (Table 3). This is the direct effect of the attendees. Table 3: Total Spending, Monticello Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Events Attendees, 2023 Category Total Spending Lodging $103 Transportation $40,470 Shopping $36,170 Groceries $32,660 Dining Out $24,530 Recreation/Attractions $3,590 Athletic -related $76,080 M isc. $4,720 Total $218,323 11 With indirect and induced effects included, Bertram Chain of Lakes athletic event attendees generated $317,433 in economic activity during summer 2023. The attendees supported 10 jobs in the community (Table 4). Table 4: Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Athletic Event Attendees: Total Economic Contribution, 2023 Category Output Labor Income Employment Direct $218,323 $72,340 6 Indirect $67,920 $18,480 3 Induced $31,190 $8,760 1 Total $317,433 $99,580 10 Bertram Chain of Lakes athletic event attendees generated $317,433 in economic activity. Of that, $99,113 was created at businesses not necessarily visited by event attendees. The industries that benefited the most from the attendees (beyond direct visits) included real estate, utilities, and administrative and support services (Chart 17). Chart 17: Top Industries Affected, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Real Estate Utilities Administrative & Support - Insurance Carriers Professional & Technical Services Warehouse & Storage Restaurants & Bars Repair & Maint. Trucking Banking $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 ■ Indirect Induced Real estate is a broad category, including items such as rents paid by businesses and mortgage payments by employees. Real estate is often one of the top industries impacted for two reasons. First, most businesses and employees spend money to occupy space. Second, most real estate needs are satisfied locally. When a Bertram Chian of Lakes athletic event attendee goes shopping at a local retail store, a significant share of that store's local spending is to occupy the building. Utilities also experience a fair share of the impact from athletic events in Monticello. As with real estate, retail stores pay to keep their stores cool during the summer, and the spending is with local utility companies. Restaurants and bars would also have similar expenditures for space and 12 for cooling. Retail stores and restaurants are primary places that Bertram Chain of Lakes athletic event attendees visit during their trips to Monticello. Opportunities to Increase Economic Impact The City of Monticello continues to invest in Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, including the athletic fields. As these investments are made, the economic impact should also increase. In reviewing the survey results, Extension recommends the following to boost economic impact. Continue to host larger events, such as state tournaments. During summer 2023, Monticello did not host any "marquee" events, such as a state tournament. State tournaments have previously been held at the park. Further development will also make the facilities more attractive for event planners. Hosting tournaments will drive economic activity on two levels. First, it will attract more visitors. The one -day soccer jamboree attracted 550 youth to the fields. Holding another event that attracts hundreds of people across two days would increase spending. In addition, previous Extension studies have shown that overnight visitors spend more than day visitors. Logically, overnight visitors have lodging expenses, but they also spend more on meals and entertainment, as they are in the community for longer periods of time. For example, a recent Extension study of youth ice event attendees showed day trippers spent $64.50 per person, while overnight visitors spent more than double at $133.30. In the Monticello example, if overnight visitors spent twice as much as day visitors, the per person spending would increase to $101 per day. Adding one additional event with 5 50 participants would increase the economic impact of the athletic events to an estimated $635,500. • Develop marketing materials to drive attendees to other Monticello attractions. Compared with similar Extension studies, per person spending on dining out and recreation was lower among Bertram Chain of Lakes athletic event attendees. In addition, only about 20 respondents cited "dining options" and "things to do in Monticello" as the most enjoyable aspect of their trip to Monticello. This may have less to do with the dining and recreation opportunities in the city and more to do with an awareness level among attendees. Another contributing factor might be that many athletic event attendees drove shorter distances to attend and opted to return home. The city or its tourism partners may wish to develop marketing materials to target athletic event attendees. This may be as simple as a "fun things in Monticello" poster at the fields or a brochure to distribute during events. Demographics of Survey Respondents Survey respondents were primarily between the ages of 27 and 58, or of the GenX and millennial generations (Chart 18). 13 Chart 18: Age of Survey Respondents, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Millennials 55% GenZ Baby Boomers 3% 6% GenX 36% Survey respondents reported home addresses across Minnesota, but primarily within the Twin Cities metro area (Map 1 and Table 5). Map 1: Home Zip Code Locations of Survey Respondents, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 14 The highest share of attendees came from Wright, Sherburne and Stearns Counties. Table 5: Respondents by County of Residence, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 County Number of Responses Wright 77 Sherburne 47 Stearns 34 Hennepin 9 Ramsey 7 Benton 5 Carver 5 Anoka 4 Scott 4 McLeod 3 Grant 2 Mille Lacs 2 Douglas 1 Isanti 1 Meeker 1 Otter Tail 1 Renville 1 Sibley 1 Sanders (MT) 1 Survey respondents were more likely to be female (Chart 19). Chart 19: Gender of Survey Respondents, Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Male 32% emale 68% Respondents were primarily White, non -Hispanic (Charts 20 and 21). 15 Chart 20: Race of Survey Respondents, Bertram Chain of Lakes Event Attendees, 2023 Asian Black or African � I1% Two or more American / races 1% I 1% White 97% Chart 21: Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, Bertram Chain of Lake Athletic Event Attendees, 2023 Yes 8% ill No 92% End Notes 'Tourism Economics. (2019). Sports tourism: state of the industry report 2019. Retrieved from http s: //www. sportseta.org/liortals/sportscommissions/Documents/Reports/TourisniEconomics%20- %20Snorts%20ETA%20SOTI%20%20FINAL_82620.pdf Learn more about the Department of Community Development at extension.umn.edu. 16 Appendix 1: Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Athletic Event Attendee Questionnaire 1. Is today's athletic event your primary reason for traveling to Monticello? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Do you live in zip code 55362? ❑ Yes, please move to Question 6 ❑ No, please continue with Question 3 3. Prior to today, have you ever visited Monticello? ❑ Yes ❑ No 4. How likely are you to make a return trip to Monticello in the next 12 months? (Check ONLY 1) ❑ Very likely ❑ Likely ❑ Unsure ❑ Unlikely ❑ Very unlikely 5. What would be the main reason(s) for your return trip to Monticello? (Check all that apply) ❑ Dining ❑ Shopping ❑ Sightseeing or Recreation ❑ Attending another athletic event ❑ Another visit to Bertram Chain of Lakes Park ❑ Other (Please specify: __________________) 6. Please estimate your travel group's spending in Monticello during the past 24 hours (*For Monticello residents, include spending only related to the use of the athletic fields): Lodging $ ________ Transportation (includes gas) $________ Shopping $ _ Groceries $________ Restaurants/Bars $ ________ Recreation/attractions $ ------- Athletic-related activities $ _____ On-site concessions $__________ Misc. $ (explain:_________) 7. How many people (including yourself) are included in your spending estimate? 8. How many of those people participated in the athletic event you traveled to Monticello for? 9. Have you visited or will you visit other areas of Bertram Chain of Lakes Park beyond the athletic fields on this trip? ❑ Yes ❑ No 10. Are you aware of the other activities available at Bertram Chain of Lakes Park, including (Check all the apply)? ❑ Swimming ❑ Camping ❑ Kayaking ❑ Mountain biking ❑ Trails ❑ Other (Please specify: 11. Did you or will you spend a night away from home on this trip? ❑ Yes, please continue to Question 12 ❑ No, please move to Question 15 12. How many nights, in total, did you or do you plan to spend away from home during this trip? ____ nights 13. If you stayed or are staying in Monticello, which type of accommodation did you use? ❑ Hotel/motel ❑ Resort/commercial cabin ❑ Vacation rental by owner ❑ Bed & Breakfast ❑ Bertram Chain of Lakes campground ❑ Other RV/camping location ❑ Home of a friend/relative ❑ Other, please specify 14. If you stayed or are staying in another community, what was your primary reason for selecting that location? (Check only 1) ❑ I could not find an available hotel room(s) in Monticello ❑ I found a lower cost option in another community ❑ I found a higher quality option in another community ❑ I selected based on my loyalty to a certain hotel brand (ex. Hilton Honors) ❑ I found accommodations with -or- closer to family and/or friends ❑ My preferred type of accommodation (ex. VRBO) is/was not available in Monticello, please list your preferred accommodation here ___________________ ❑ Other, please specify ____________________ Please skip to Question 16 15. What factors did you consider in your decision to not spend the night in during your trip? (Check all that apply). ❑ I attended a one -day activity that did not require a hotel stay ❑ Due to distance, I opted to drive to/from home ❑ I could not find an available hotel room(s) in Monticello ❑ Available rooms were outside of my budget ❑ I preferred a higher quality hotel ❑ The hotel brand (ex. Hilton) I preferred was not available ❑ I found accommodations with -or- closer to family and/or friends ❑ Other, please specify ____________________ 16. What are (were) the most enjoyable aspects of your trip to Monticello? (Check all that apply) ❑ Quality of the athletic facilities ❑ Being outdoors Lakes Park ❑ Dining options community ❑ Hotel accommodations ❑ Other, please specify ❑ Things to do in the community ❑ Activities/amenities in Bertram Chain of ❑ Customer service/friendliness of the ❑ Location in relationship to the Twin Cities 17. If you could select one item to improve at the athletic park, what would it be? ❑ Field quality ❑ Parking ❑ Amenities (restrooms/water/concessions) ❑ Pathway connections ❑ Visitor information for planning ❑ Assistance ❑ Other, please specify - 18. Overall, how satisfied are you with the Bertram Chain of Lakes athletic facilities in Monticello? (Check ONLY 1) ❑ Very satisfied ❑ Satisfied ❑ Unsure ❑ Dissatisfied ❑ Very dissatisfied 19. If Monticello were to develop additional facilities at Betram Chain of Lakes, what features would you like to see? Finally, a few questions about you. What is your zip code? ________ In what year were you born? ❑ Male ❑ Nonbinary What is your annual household income (before taxes)? ❑ Less Than $25,000 ❑ $25,000-49,999 ❑ $50,000-$99,999 more What is your gender? ❑ Female ❑ $100,000-149,999 ❑ $150,000 or Are you of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin (check one)? ❑ Yes ❑ No What is your race? (Check all that apply) ❑ American Indian or Alaska Native ❑ Asian ❑ Black or African-American ❑ White ❑ Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander ❑ Multiracial ❑ Other (Please specify __________________) Thank you for your participation!! Date Time © 2023, Regents of the University of Minnesota. University of Minnesota Extension is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this publication/material is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to 612-625-8233. Monticello HOUSING WORKSHOP PREPARATION WORKSHEET After reviewing the 2023 Housing Study Update ... My key takeaway(s) are: My biggest housing priorities are: (Think about each of the market segments in the report: owner -occupied, rental, senior, etc.) need more information on: EDA -HELD PROPERTY WORKSHOP I NOVEMBER 8, 2023 SUMMARY 1. RIVER STREET a. 2040 Economic Development Goals: Depending on the use of the property both Downtown Vitality, Life -cycle Housing b. Priority: LOW (5-10 years) c. Notes/Discussion: • Hold for possible integration with a larger redevelopment project in the area, including townhomes similar to those to the north. • Proximity to the river is an advantage for higher amenity housing, less likely for affordable housing. • Location makes it ideal to support/work outward from downtown activities. • Located in Mississippi Wild Scenic and Recreational River District, which limits impervious and height, some uses. d. Next Steps: • Continue to illustrate on available property maps. • Monitor acquisition opportunity and private development interest. e. Marketing/Development Strategies: • Continue to illustrate on available property maps. 2. 349 WEST BROADWAY (FORMER FRED'S AUTO) a. 2040 Economic Development Goals: Downtown Vitality, Redevelopment & reinvestment, Opportunity Area b. Priority: LOW (5-10 years) c. Notes/Discussion: • Hold for potential combination with redevelopment/revitalization of adjacent former post office site. • EDA would consider additional land acquisition in the area depending on timing and price. • Would consider re -use of existing site depending on the use and surrounding revitalization opportunity. d. Next Steps: • Monitor acquisition opportunity and private development interest. • Concept development rendering; clearly depicting private properties (discussion with adjacent property owner). • EDA should define desired users, if any. (Refer to zoning ordinance.) e. Marketing/Development Strategies: • Continue to illustrate on available property maps. 1IPage 3. BLOCK 36 a. 2040 Economic Development Goals: Downtown Vitality, Promotion & Partnerships b. Priority: LOW (5-10 YEARS+) c. Notes/Discussion: • Utilize as a connection between existing parking and Broadway — small improvements on the parcel with that function as the focus. • Involve PARC in concept development. d. Next Steps: • Discuss priority for parklet improvements as part of current PAR Master Planning for specific concepts and initiatives. • Staff to research and advise EDA on funding opportunities and restrictions for improvements to/on property. • Budget for improvements in EDA CIP request. e. Marketing/Development Strategies: • Continue to illustrate on available property maps. 4. CEDAR STREET SITE a. 2040 Economic Development Goals: Downtown Vitality, Life -Cycle Housing, Redevelopment & Reinvestment b. Priority: HIGH (1-3 YEARS) c. Notes/Discussion: • Ideal use is two-story "brownstone" townhomes, fronting Broadway, deck over rear -load garages. • Market rate housing with affordable component preferred. • Continue to look for opportunities to manage traffic and safe access across both Hwy. 25 and CR75; look at alternative traffic control at River and Cedar. • More environmental review needed; review DEED, MPCA or other state assistance. • No additional acquisition is likely needed for successful development. • Zoning currently allows townhouses and multi -family units of 4-12 units by CUP in this sub -district of the CCD. d. Next Step • Obtain quote for additional environmental work, complete work. • Determine priority and eligibility for remediation grants. • Contract for debris and fence removal; understand snow storage. • Discuss desired housing program/projects at Housing Workshop in 2024. e. Marketing/Development Strategies: • Continue to illustrate on available property maps. • Design, construct and place "for sale" sign. • Develop a concept rendering of intended product and other development parameters. • Develop a list of possible developers and/or contractors. • Prepare RFP. 21 Page 5. BLOCK 34 a. 2040 Economic Development Goals: Downtown Vitality, Redevelopment & Reinvestment, Business Expansion & Retention b. Priority: HIGH (1-3 YEARS) c. Notes/Discussion: • Quarter to half block redevelopment is an option. • Evaluate opportunity to relocate one or both municipal wells, including cost and timeframe. • Two-story development design preferred (not 4+ stories). • Professional office uses preferred, residential not preferred. • Additional acquisition is an opportunity on the block. • Parking for existing multi -family will need to be a consideration with redevelopment. • Develop the perimeter, leaving the center for parking (and wells if not relocated); small structured parking something to look at in terms of design and cost. • More environmental work is likely needed d. Next Steps: • Continue to illustrate on available property maps. • Obtain quote for remaining TIF qualification and environmental work, complete. • Determine priority and eligibility for remediation grants. • Workshop with City on intended uses, parking and wells. • Consider amendment to the Downtown Small Area Plan for intended uses. • Zoning allows a mix of commercial and residential uses; block is split between Pine Street and Walnut & Cedar sub -districts. • Continue to monitor acquisition opportunity. e. Marketing/Development Strategies: • Develop a concept rendering of intended product, site plan incorporating wells and development parameters. 6. 4T" & PALM a. 2040 Economic Development Goals: Life -Cycle Housing, Tax Base Expansion b. Priority: MEDIUM (5 YEARS) c. Notes/Discussion: • Medium density housing preferred (not apartments). • Senior living opportunity. • Market rate with affordable housing component preferred. • Evaluate well relocation to this site and any development footprint impact. • Potential to utilize Palm Street ROW for access. • Owner -occupied preferred. d. Next Steps: • Work with Engineering/Public Works to understand well relocation. 31 Page • Discuss desired housing program/projects at Housing Workshop in 2024. e. Marketing/Development Strategies: • Continue to illustrate on available property maps. 7. RIVERWOOD BANK PROPERTY a. 2040 Economic Development Goals: Tax Base Expansion, Workforce Development, Business Retention & Expansion b. Priority: HIGH (1-3 YEARS) c. Notes/Discussion: • Commercial uses preferred, light industrial or campus opportunity. • Develop to take advantage of 1-94 visibility. • Be mindful about competing with private property owners; focus on diversification of business types. • No outdoor sales and display uses. d. Next Steps: • Consider re -guiding and rezoning property following acquisition. • Defer 7t" Street assessments to development. e. Marketing/Development Strategies: • Continue to illustrate on available property maps. • Consider developing a concept rendering of intended products and uses. • Install a for sale/development sign. 8. OTTER CREEK a. 2040 Economic Development Goals: Business Expansion & Retention, Workforce Development b. Priority: MEDIUM (3-5 YEARS) c. Notes/Discussion: • No additional expansion of park needed at this time given the existing supply; work to develop private industrial properties in the community. d. Next Steps: • Complete shovel -ready certification. Site visit is next task (likely spring 2024). e. Marketing/Development Strategies: • Implement Integrated Marketing & Communications Plan; prioritize actions from plan. • Review site selection marketing opportunities. • Partner with Xcel's site selection team to further marketing. 41 Page Monticello Lakes Apartments Residential Southeast area of The Pointes at Cedar 2100 unit multi -family apartments 12/13/2021 Under Construction Twin Pines Apartments Residential South Side of School Blvd. East of Wal-Mart 96 multi -family unit apartment building 2/28/2022 Yet to Break Ground Block 52 Redevelopment Mixed -Use NE Corner of Highway 25 and Broadway St 87 multi -family units with rougly 30,000 sq ft of 1st floor commercial 9/30/2022 Under Construction/ Apartment Renting in Progress Featherstone 6th Addition Residential North of 85th St NE and West of Highway 25 21 Single-family lots with commercially guided outlots for future development 8/24/2022 Under Construction (Last New Const. Permit Pulled) Tesla Stations at Cub Foods Commercial 206 7th St W Installation of 8 charging ports in the Cub Foods parking lot 7/12/2022 Completed Taco Bell Remodel Commercial 124 7th St E Remodel of existing building and expansion of 724 sq ft 9/30/2022 Completed Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Residential South of Farmstead Ave and West of Fallon Ave NE 59 Single -Family Lot Development Reapproved 8/28/2023 Site Grading Commenced Headwaters West Development Residential Along South side of 7th St W between Elm St and Golf Course Rd 102 apartment unit & 60 townhome Senior 55+ Development 9/26/2022 Townhomes Under Construction Sunny Days Therapy Commercial Along South side of 7th St E West of Old McDonald's Location Development of an Occupational Child Therapy Facility 8/22/2022 Completed - Ribbon Cutting was held on 11/16/2023 Camping World Commercial 3801 Chelsea Rd W Installation of an attached paint booth (1,100 sq ft) 8/22/2022 Under Construction Wiha Tools USA Industrial Along South Side of 7th St E across from Wright St and Ramsey St New construction light manufacturing (72,540 sq ft) 11/28/2022 Under Construction Kwik Trip #345 Commercial 9440 State Highway 25 Expansion of current facility (520 sq ft) 0 1/23/2023 Completed Scooter's Coffee Commercial 100 7th St W. New Construction of Drive -Through Coffee Shop 1/23/2023 Completed Cargill Kitchens Solutions Industrial 206 W. 4th St. Replacement of Outdoor Storage Tanks 4/24/2023 Completed Deephaven 3 (Lot 2) Commercial Southeast corner of Cedar St and Chelsea Rd New Construction of a Clinic/Medical Service Facility (10,000 sq ft) N/A Under Construction Culver's 2nd Drive -Through Aisle Commercial 9395 State Highway 25 0 Addition of a 2nd Drive -Through Aisle along the South Property Line 7/24/2023 Nearing Completion