The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 02-26-20241. Agenda Documents Documents: 02-26-24 AGENDA REVISED.PDF 2024-2-12 MINUTES CC SPEC (DRAFT).PDF 2024-2-12 MINUTES CC (DRAFT).PDF WCSO ANNUAL AND 4TH QUARTER REPORT.PDF 2A PAYMENT OF BILLS.PDF 2B NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES.PDF 2C PROPERTY.PDF 2D LIONS OFF -SITE GAMBLING PERMIT.PDF 2E LIQUOR LICENSE TRANSFER.PDF 2F GMEF LOAN BLOCK 52.PDF 2H CUP FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE - KASPER.PDF 21 BIG RIVER PUD-PRELIMINARY PLAT-REZONE.PDF 2J COUNTRY CLUB MANOR VACATE EASEMENT.PDF 2K ACCEPT OUTLOT A GREAT RIVER ADDITION PARCEL.PDF 2L OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT WEST BRIDGE PARK IMPROVEMENT.PDF 2M RIVERSIDE CEMETERY RULES.PDF 2N 7TH STREET TEMPORARY EASEMENTS.PDF 20 BOBCAT 40 INCH COLD PLANER.PDF 2P CIMLINE TACK TRAILER.PDF 3A AMENDING FEE SCHEDULE.PDF 4A PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT PAUSE.PDF AGENDA (REVISED) REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, February 26, 2024 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Mayor: Lloyd Hilgart Council Members: Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie, Sam Murdoff 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from February 12, 2024 • Regular Meeting Minutes from February 12, 2024 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, except for referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • City Announcements • MCC Announcements • Monticello Royal Ambassadors F. Council Liaison Updates • Economic Development Authority (EDA) • Parks, Arts, and Recreation Commission (PARC) G. Department Updates • Wright County Sheriff's Office Quarterly & Annual Update • Managed Natural Landscapes Update 2. Consent Agenda —All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-14 approving the issuance of a lawful off -site gambling permit for the Monticello Lions for purse bingo at the American Legion Post 260 on April 13, 2024 E. Consideration of approving transfer of liquor license from Tricambra Food Inc. to Mattrerose Foods LLC, dba Cornerstone Cafe & Catering located at 154 W. Broadway F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-15 approving Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) Loan to Buchholz -Block 52 Holdings in the amount of $300,000 for Project Simpl Office Space at 101 West Broadway G. REMOVED - Cens*d,,Fati„n „f appFeving an agFeernent with Xrzel EneFgy fee the f9F $196 904 43 H. Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for accessory structures exceeding 1,200 square feet in the R-A, Residential Amenities District. Applicant: Dave Kasper Consideration of approving a Development Stage Planned Unit Development for a multi -commercial project in the B-2, Limited Business District; preliminary plat of Big River 445; request for simple subdivision of a single parcel with split - zoning, B-2, Limited Business District and IBC, Industrial & Business Campus District. Applicant: Division 25, LLC Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-16 calling for a public hearing on March 25, 2024, on vacation of drainage and utility easements as legally described for a portion of Country Club Manor Second and Third Addition K. Consideration of accepting the conveyance of a 4.81-acre stormwater parcel, Outlot A, Great River Addition, from the Economic Development Authority (EDA) to the City of Monticello L. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-18 authorizing submission of 2024 Outdoor Recreation Grant application for West Bridge Park Improvements M. Consideration of approving updates to Riverside Cemetery Rules and Regulations N. Consideration of approving temporary easements for the 7th Street retaining wall project O. Consideration of approving the purchase of a new Bobcat 40" asphalt cold planer with dust control from Farm Rite Equipment in the amount of $33,034.01 and declaring the two 2002 Alitec cold planers as surplus P. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of a 2024 Cimline tack kettle trailer from Midstates Equipment in the amount of $27,100 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings A. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 821 amending Chapter 36 — 2024 Fee Schedule, Community Development — Economic Development and Planning/Zoning to add various planning and economic development escrows/fees 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of pausing the Public Works Facility Project contracts with Oertel Architects and RJM Construction at 90% design completion to address project funding 4. Adjournment MINUTES MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Monday, February 12, 2024 — 4:45 p.m. Academy Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie, and Sam Murdoff Absent: None 1. Call to Order Mayor Lloyd Hilgart called the workshop to order at 4:45 p.m. 2. Strategic Planning (including discussion on new public works facility) The Council held a workshop on Strategic Planning, including discussion on the new public works facility. Items reviewed included: Comprehensive Plan, policy positions, long-term planning, and projects. There was specific discussion held on the new public works facility, primarily on cost and funding options. This was a workshop, therefore, no council action was taken. 3. Adjournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Council Special Meeting Minutes — February 12, 2024 City Administrator REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, February 12, 2024 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie, and Sam Murdoff Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Hilgart called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Agenda Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the agenda. Councilmember Martie seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from January 22, 2023 • Regular Meeting Minutes from January 22, 2023 Councilmember Hinz moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments None. E. Public Service Announcements ➢ Haley Foster, Communications & Marketing Specialist, noted the following public announcements: • President's Day • Elections Update • Spring Tree Sale • Flashing Yellow Arrows • Deep Freeze Pickleball Tournament • GLOW Fest Parade • Lantern Decorating Social F. Council Liaison Updates • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler provided an update of the meeting held Tuesday February 6. The commission held three public City Council Minutes: February 12, 2024 Page 1 1 3 hearings: Country Manor PUD, Kasper CUP, and Big River 445 items. They also approved property acquisition of parcel 155010034120. • Economic Development Authority (EDA) — Councilmember gave an update of the meeting held February 14. The group reviewed the Integrated Marketing and Communications Plan. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Murdoff moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Martie seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Action taken: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total of $1,098,686.73. B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments. Action taken: Approved the hires for Monticello Community Center and Hi - Way Liquors. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Action taken: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-12 accepting donation of a museum tour from Veit ($40 value). Action taken: The resolution accepting the donation was adopted. E. Consideration of approving a special event permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance for the Wrigth/Sherburne Pride Fest on July 20, 2024. Applicant: Emma Hamlin. Action taken: Approved the event permit. F. Consideration of approving a temporary gambling permit for St. Henry Catholic Church for bingo to be held on April 14, 2024, at Little Mountain Elementary, 9350 Fallon Avenue. Action taken: Approved the gambling permit. G. Consideration of approving 2023 operating transfers. Action taken: Approved the operating transfers. H. Consideration of writing off uncollectable accounts receivable balances in 2023. Action taken: Authorized the writing off of uncollectable accounts receivable balances. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-13 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $81,408.21 to Michels Power, Inc. for the installation of FiberNet facilities in the Country Club Manor 2nd development. Action taken: Resolution accepting improvements and authorizing final payment was adopted. City Council Minutes: February 12, 2024 Page 2 1 3 Consideration of suspending liquor license for Tricambra Foods, Inc. located at 154 West Broadway. Action taken: Suspension was approved. 3. Public Hearings: 4. Regular Agenda: 5. Adiournment: The meeting was adjourned at 6:38 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes: February 12, 2024 Page 3 1 3 Wright County Sheriff's Office Monticello City Quarterly Review Calls for Service assigned in Monticello 3369 Case Reports assigned to patrol 1257 �- Burglary 2 - Damaged to Property - General Thefts - Thefts from vehicle - Shoplifting Drug Complaints Juvenile Complaints Motor Vehicle Crashes 14 37 13 45 18 17 129 (12 involved injuries) Assault Complaints 1 Domestic Disturbance Complaints 49 Traffic Stops 807 DUI Incidents (includes stops & MVA w/ 11 arrests) Citations Issued (Criminal, Traffic & Ordinance) 270 Individuals Arrested/Booked into Jail 63 !�OIR�Ti%' 3904 1320 6 21 32 5 58 10 31 97 (8 involved injuries) 6 54 1304 15 390 62 '01I'm 1oWlIh'[O Rr + 15.88 % +5.01 % +200 +50 % -13.51 % -61.54 % +28.89 % -44.44 % +82.35 -24.81 +500 + 10.20 % +61.58 +36.36 +44.44 % -1.59 Divisional Highlights - Patrol 1320 Case Reports Completed (1257 in 2022) The Face of the Wright County Sheriff's Office. Patrol Captain, 3 Patrol Lieutenants, 12 Patrol Sergeants a majority of Deputies comprise the Patrol Division The City of Monticello contracts with Wright County to provide law enforcement services for 60 hours per day. Throughout most of the day, at least 2 deputies are scheduled in Monticello. Several Stolen Vehicle calls at the end of December / early January 2024. Through work with the other divisions (CID, SIU, MCIU, SRO's) we were able to determine those responsible and pursue charges for several stolen vehicle cases. ;tir Divisional Highlight! Specialty Divisions Criminal Investigation Division (CID) ► 54 Case Reports Completed (44 in 2022) Many are assists to Patrol Many of these cases are time consuming and require a lot of follow up and additiona work Major Crimes Investigation Unit (Mciu) ► 14 Case reports completed (3 in 2022) Works closely with other units/divisions Supports investigations by more detailed documentation and specific evidence collection & preservation Special Investigation Unit (sw ► 16 Case Reports completed (12 in 2022) Plain clothes deputies R Primarily work drug -related crimes Assist other divisions on various cases Computer Forensics Unit (CID) ► 7 Case reports completed (a in 2022) Works with CID on computer -related crimes or when computers are seized or taken as evidence Divisional Highlight Specialty Divisions (continued) School Resource Officer Division (SRO) ► 41 Case Reports Completed (101 in 2022) SRO's work closely with students and School administration and staff to keep our school safe and secure. Currently, our SRO division is comprised of 2 Sergeants and 12 Deputies (2 of which solely work in the Monticello School District). A lot of the decrease in the case reports can be accounted for by new legislation that has occurred within the State of Minnesota regarding School Resource Officers. We are still a visible presence in our schools and are committed to providing safe schools throughout the County and in Monticello. ► SRO's stay very busy building relationships with students, handling higher profile cases within the schools, and assisting staff on day-to-day activities and projects DRIVING WHILE IMPAIRED DWI IN WRIGHT COUNTY RECOGNITION The Wright County Sheriff's Office and Wright County Attorney's Office strive to make the roads within Wright County safe for all who utilize the roadways. In 2023, The Wright County Sheriff's Office handled a total of 375 DUI cases throughout the County - 58 of them being within the City of Monticello. WRIGHT COUNTY WAS THE TOP COUNTY IN THE STATE FOR DWI ENFORCEMENT IN 2023 - WRIGHT COUNTY WAS THE 4T" OVERALL AGENCY IN DUI ENFORCEMENT IN 2023 Driving impaired is more than just alcohol - it is any DWI Facts substance that may impair your ability to drive (alcohol, marijuana, illicit drugs, and prescription drugs) MN DWI Law for alcohol is 0.08 Persons arrested and convicted of a first-time offense (depending on alcohol level) can see a large fine, up to $3000, and up to a year in jail. Persons will also get sanctions on their driver's license and could be unable to drive for a significant period of time With marijuana now being legalized, we are seeing more DWI's relating to impairment by marijuana. It is illegal to drive while under the influence of marijauan 0 Toward Zero Death (TZD) - Wright County Sheriff's Office participates in the States TZD program for targets DWI enforcement throughout the year. These state dollars are acquired through grants and utilized for DWI enforcement on specific dates when DWI's may be most likely to occur. I - - - - -.- - - - - Questions? j"-KRIFF W 1? �ARIN� WRIGHT COUNTY !7— CARING Contac.- lo. Lieutenant Jason Kramber 763-682-7433 (Office Phone) jason.kramber@co.wright.mn.us ► Sergeant Kevin Triplett 763-286-6685 (Cell Phone) kevin.triplett@co.wright.mn.us Emergency Phone Number 911 Non -Emergency Phone Number 763-682-1162 CITY OF Monticello Wright County Sheriff's Office Annual Activity Report 2023 MISSION The Wright County Sheriff's Office, in partnership with the community, is committed to improving our quality of life. We uphold the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Minnesota, and dedicate ourselves to maintaining order, protecting life and property, reducing the fear of crime and ensuring a safe and secure correctional facility. We hold ourselves accountable to the guiding principles of integrity, professionalism, caring, and fairness. GUIDING PRINCIPLES INTEGRITY We pride ourselves on upholding the highest ethical standards that guide us to serve in a trustworthy, truthful, and honorable manner. PROFESSIONALISM We inspire trust and cooperation within the community and the Sheriff's Office. We are well -trained, highly motivated, progressive and innovative while providing responsive and quality service. CARING We are compassionate and respectful. We are approachable, understanding, and considerate of the needs of all people. FAIRNESS We are equitable, just and consistent. We serve the community and each other in an unbiased and impartial manner. Sheriff Sean Deringer Mayor Lloyd Hilgart, City Council Members Sam Murdoff, Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie and City Administrator Rachel Leonard. Citizens of Wright County, The Wright County Sheriff's Office is the 3rd largest Sheriff's Office in the State of Minnesota. We provide law enforcement services to 13 of the county's 16 cities along with all unincorporated areas of Wright County. In a strong partnership with the community, we are able to provide the citizens with reliable service to maintain the high-level quality of life that we have come to enjoy and expect. There are five divisions within the Sheriff's Office: Patrol, Criminal Investigations, Operations, Business Management and Corrections. Each division is broken down into smaller units such as: administration, court security, communications, community services, detective, emergency management, emergency response team, k-9, special investigations, school resource, recreational services, civil/warrants/transports, and traffic enforcement. With the help of our community, the Wright County Sheriff's Office will continue to meet our challenges of providing high quality, cost effective and efficient law enforcement services to everyone in Wright County. I look forward to working with and collaborating with our community leaders and citizens to ensure that we continue to carry out our mission of "keeping the peace" with professionalism, fairness, caring and integrity. Respectfully, Sean A. Deringer Wright County Sheriff -1 10 year look back at Monticello contracting history with the Sheriff's Office: o Contract rate history: ■ 2014: $62.50 Hourly Annual Cost $1,095,000 ■ 2015: $64.50 Hourly Annual Cost $1,130,040 ■ 2016: $67.00 Hourly Annual Cost $1,177,056 ■ 2017: $69.50 Hourly Annual Cost $1,217,640 ■ 2018: $72.00 Hourly Annual Cost $1,314,432 ■ 2019: $74.50 Hourly Annual Cost $1,414,010 ■ 2020: $78.25 Hourly Annual Cost $1,489,254 ■ 2021: $81.75 Hourly Annual Cost $1,551,615 ■ 2022: $84.20 Hourly Annual Cost $1,598,116 ■ 2023: $86.75 Hourly Annual Cost $1,816,545 ■ 2024: $105.00 Hourly Projected Cost $2,305,800 The City of Monticello has been contracting law enforcement services with the Sheriff's Office since the early 1970's. Monticello increased coverage in July of 2008 from 48 hour a day to 52 hours. In 2014, the coverage was reduced to 48 hours a day. In July of 2018, Monticello increased their coverage back to 52 hours a day. In May 2023, coverage hours will increase to 60 hours a day for the City of Monticello. 2023 Activity Sheriff Deputies responded to 13,727 calls for service in Monticello in 2023. Of those calls for service, 5,941 incidents turned into a case report and required further investigation by the deputies. The following graphs contain a snapshot of Monticello's 2023 law enforcement activity. 2023 Monticello Quality of Life Incidents 0 200 400 600 800 1000 EIGHBORHOOD DISPUTE 33 DISORDERLY 52 THREATS 59 UNWANTED PERSON 85 NOISE 102 HARASSMENT 103 LOST PROPERTY 108 JUVENILE ACTIVITY 152 ANIMAL 170 CITIZEN AID 188 DOMESTIC 196 CHECK WELFARE 373 ALARM 515 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 516 CIVIL 802 MEDICAL 1034 1200 ML 2023 Monticello Traffic C SNOWBIRD 11 WFIC - HAZARD 30 DUI 58 PARKING 1 97 :IC - COMPLAINT . 253 HICLE ACCIDENT 370 TRAFFIC - STOP 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 2023 Monticello Crime Incidents 0 50 100 150 200 250 BURGLARY 15 SEX RELATED 22 FRAUD 23 JRT ORDER VIOLATION IAMAGE TO PROPERTY ASSAULT DRUGS THEFT 37 63 83 111 4,738 5,000 300 350 287 2016 — 2023 Population & Calls for Service Population (Calls 16000 14000 4 s 12000 ` S 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 0.85 PER 0.88 PER 0.83 PER 0.80 PER 0.73 PER 0.77 PER 0.73 PER 0.91 PER CAPITA CAPITA CAPITA CAPITA CAPITA CAPITA CAPITA CAPITA (POPULATION ESTIMATED) 2022 — 2023 City of Monticello Significant Incident Codes Assault Burglary Court Order Violation Criminal Damage to Property Drugs Fraud Homicide Robbery Sex Related = Theft 10 61 98 The Special Investigations Unit (SIU) is part of the Wright County Sheriff's Office Criminal Investigations Division. The unit is comprised of a sergeant and two full time deputies. This is the only plain clothes and unmarked unit within the Sheriff's Office. Due to SIU's unique ability to blend in with the public, they are often utilized in situations where a marked patrol unit would not be feasible. This includes the arrest of people with warrants who commonly flee when confronted by a uniformed deputy or conducting surveillance of locations with suspected criminal activity. One of the main functions of SIU is to investigate drug crimes within Wright County. This is accomplished through investigative work, speaking with concerned citizens and informants, collaborating with other law enforcement agencies, utilizing social media, and through physical and electronic surveillance. SIU serves approximately 70 search warrants per year within the county along with assisting other local agencies with some of their search warrants. SIU also handles the civil forfeiture of cash, vehicles and firearms when their use or possession was related to controlled substance. 2023 Monticello Special Investigations Unit AGENCY ASSIST 1 DEATH 1 LOST PROPERTY 1 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT 1 STOLEN PROPERTY 1 SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCE 1 THEFT 1 GUN INCIDENT 8 SEARCH WARRANT 8 TRAFFIC STOP 9 DRUGS 11 WARRANT ARREST 15 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 The Major Crimes Investigation Unit (MCIU) is responsible for documenting and processing crime scenes and evidence collected from scenes. The unit will respond when needed for death investigations, assaults, robberies, burglaries, or any scene where advanced skills and processing techniques are needed to collect and document evidence. MCIU also responds to motor vehicle crashes resulting in serious injuries or death. Besides documenting the crime scenes, MCIU is trained in processing evidence for latent prints, DNA evidence, tire and shoe tread patterns, tool mark evidence, biological stains, and trace evidence. Most of the evidence collected is sent to the Midwest Regional Forensic Laboratory where further analysis and comparison is done and hopefully identifications are made. 2023 Monticello Major Crimes Investigations Unit DRUGS 1 FRAUD 1 GUN INCIDENT 1 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT 1 ROBBERY 1 SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCE 1 THEFT 1 WARRANT ARREST 1 CRIMINAL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY 3 SEX RELATED 3 BURGLARY 5 STOLEN VEHICLE 6 DEATH 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2023 Monticello Cases Assigned to Investigations BOMB THREAT 1 CITIZEN AID 1 NAL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY 1 DRUGS 1 GUN INCIDENT 1 PURSUIT 1 ROBBERY 1 SEX OFFENDER 1 THREATS 1 TRAFFIC COMPLAINT 1 TRAFFIC STOP _ 1 WALKAWAY ' 1 CIVIL 2 JUVENILE ACTIVITY , 2 MEDICAL 2 SEARCH WARRANT ' 2 ASSAULT 3 HARASSMENT 3 COURT ORDER VIOLATION 4 MISSING PERSON 4 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 4 DOMESTIC 6 BURGLARY 7 CHILD PORNOGRAPHY 7 DEATH 7 VULNERABLE ADULT 7 STOLEN VEHICLE 8 ABUSE 10 SEX RELATED 23 FRAUD 28 THEFT 56 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 School Resource Officers The Wright County Sheriff's Office works with 8 school districts to provide School Resource Officers (SRO) services on a contract basis. The 13 SRO's spend a good portion of their day making themselves visible and approachable to staff and students. The visibility of the deputy is a friendly reminder to students, staff and visitors that safety and security is a priority within the districts they serve. SRO's routinely assist in drills and safety assessments for the schools that they serve. Monticello has 2 SRO's assigned to their schools. 2023 Monticello School Resource Officer Calls 911 HANG UP 1 911 OPEN LINE 1 CIVIL 1 FIRE 1 FRAUD 1 LOST PROPERTY 1 OPEN DOOR/WINDOW 1 PARKING 1 SIA 1 TRAFFIC STOP 1 CHECK WELFARE 2 DOMESTIC 2 EXTRA PATROL 2 SEX RELATED _ 2 CHILD PORNOGRAPHY 3 CITIZEN AID 3 CRIMINAL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY 3 PREDATORY OFFENDER REGISTRATION 3 THEFT t 3 ABUSE 4 THREATS 5 TRAFFIC 5 DISORDERLY 6 DRUGS 6 HARASSMENT 7 FIGHT MEDICAL SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY ASSAULT MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT WALKAWAY JUVENILE COMPLAINT 0 9 9 11 12 12 12 10 60 20 30 40 50 60 70 2023 CityComparison Monticello Otsego St. Michael Significant Crime Calls Assault 83 34 33 Burglary 15 27 7 Court Order Violation 37 25 7 Criminal Damage to Property 63 70 30 Drugs 111 60 31 Fraud Complaint 123 33 11 Homicide 0 0 0 Robbery 1 1 0 Sex Related 22 10 13 Theft 287 133 91 Significant Quality of Life Calls Alarm 515 345 296 Animal 170 144 114 Check Welfare 373 218 185 Citizen Aid 188 97 92 Civil 802 627 469 Disorderly 52 23 11 Domestic Disturbance 196 151 102 Harassment 103 50 45 Juvenile Complaint 152 126 136 Lost - Found Property 108 59 51 Medical 1034 1025 763 Neighborhood Dispute 33 15 10 Noise 102 63 53 Suspicious Activity 516 329 253 Threats 59 58 34 Unwanted Person 85 37 25 Traffic Calls DUI 58 35 28 Motor Vehicle Accident 370 207 311 Parking 97 88 79 Seasonal Parking 11 10 29 Traffic - Complaint 253 170 251 Traffic - Hazard 30 31 44 ffic - Stop L 4,738 2,949 3,181 2023 Monticello Calls by Time of Day 153 137 127 128 132 129 128 117 121 114 114 113 103 108 97 67 40 37 2 22 228 29 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 �53 IN 2023 Monticello Calls by Day of Week 2,141 2,122 2,021 1,937 1,848 1,805 MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT Wright County Sheriff's Office 3800 Braddock Ave NE Buffalo, MN 55313 1-800-362-3667 Fax: 763-682-7610 Command Staff Contact Information Sheriff Sean Deringer Chief Deputy Matt Treichler Patrol Captain Todd Sandin Patrol Lieutenant Jason Kramber Patrol Lieutenant Jeremy Wirkkula Patrol Lieutenant Ben Schaap District Sergeant Kevin Triplett sean.deringer@co.wright.mn.us matthew.treichler@co.wright.mn.us todd.sandin@co.wright.mn.us iason.kramber@co.wright.mn.us ieremv.wirkkula@co.wright.mn.us beniamin.schaap@co.wright.mn.us kevin.triplett@co.wright.mn.us City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2A. Consideration of approving pavment of bills Prepared by: Meeting Date Finance Director Reviewed by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED 2/26/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,326,740.97. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. I. Budget Impact: N/A II. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of bill and purchase card registers as presented. SUPPORTING DATA • Bill registers and purchase card registers Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date User: debbie.gulbrandson Printed: 2/15/2024 4:05 PM � arr or � Monticelo Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date ACH 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO 02/15/2024 ACH 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 02/15/2024 Total for 2/15/2024: Report Total (2 checks): The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 2/26/2024 Approved by: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart Check Amount 3,888.13 80,997.39 84,885.52 84,885.52 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (2/15/2024 4:05 PM) Page 1 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date User: debbie.gulbrandson Printed: 2/15/2024 4:01 PM Check No Vendor No ACH 2282 ACH 2405 ACH 2811 ACH 3241 ACH 4263 ACH 5147 ACH 6041 CiiV 01 � Monticeto Vendor Name Check Date MRI SOFTWARE 02/15/2024 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges/Retun 02/15/2024 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 02/15/2024 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 02/15/2024 CAYAN 02/15/2024 MN PEIP 02/15/2024 HEALTHEQUITY INC 02/15/2024 Total for 2/15/2024: Report Total (7 checks): The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 2/26/2024 Approved by: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart Check Amount 37.00 15,734.25 69,434.03 3,400.59 1,353.84 58,847.35 316.60 149,123.66 149,123.66 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (2/15/2024 4:01 PM) Page 1 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date User: debbie.gulbrandson Printed: 2/21/2024 2:55 PM CiiV 01 � Monticeto Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date ACH 1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY 02/27/2024 ACH 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 02/27/2024 ACH 1074 BOLTON AND MENK INC 02/27/2024 ACH 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 02/27/2024 ACH 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 02/27/2024 ACH 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 02/27/2024 ACH 1186 BDG INC 02/27/2024 ACH 1223 HAWKINS INC 02/27/2024 ACH 1273 KIWI KAI IMPORTS, INC. 02/27/2024 ACH 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, 102/27/2024 ACH 1320 TRICIA HANDORFF 02/27/2024 ACH 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER 02/27/2024 ACH 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC 02/27/2024 ACH 1417 OSC OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY 02/27/2024 ACH 1518 TDS TELECOM 02/27/2024 ACH 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 02/27/2024 ACH 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 02/27/2024 ACH 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 1572 THE WINE COMPANY 02/27/2024 ACH 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH 02/27/2024 ACH 1684 VINOCOPIA 02/27/2024 ACH 1726 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES 02/27/2024 ACH 2O59 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH 02/27/2024 ACH 2407 ALL ELEMENTS 02/27/2024 ACH 2783 PERMITWORKS LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC 02/27/2024 ACH 4502 ARVIG 02/27/2024 ACH 4633 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 02/27/2024 ACH 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 02/27/2024 ACH 4962 RENGEL PRINTING COMPANY, INC 02/27/2024 ACH 5201 DICK FAMILY, INC. 02/27/2024 ACH 5211 RANDI O'KEEFE KRIER 02/27/2024 ACH 5393 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 02/27/2024 ACH 5426 NOVEL SOLAR TWO LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 5736 MAVERICK WINE LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 5934 MARIO FRUCCI 02/27/2024 ACH 5989 SP3,LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 6251 STEPHEN W GRITTMAN 02/27/2024 ACH 6272 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING COOMP 02/27/2024 ACH 6285 NOKOMIS ENERGY LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 6300 NOVEL SOLAR ONE LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 6301 NOVEL SOLAR FIVE LLC 02/27/2024 ACH 6306 STONEBROOKE ENGINEERING INC 02/27/2024 128174 5660 ABSOLUTE PRINT GRAPHICS 02/27/2024 128175 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 02/27/2024 Check Amount 2,910.77 15,630.08 18,027.50 4,370.00 177.85 58,969.18 450.00 115.20 7,065.90 1,741.25 4,539.67 72.36 5,625.00 6,473.09 614.82 340.89 546.85 270.00 815.00 551.00 196,277.25 1,740.73 1,410.87 21,085.80 5,776.85 117.68 1,495.00 700.00 399,596.15 1,549.67 35,691.78 5,226.15 242.30 1,946.88 80,006.17 16,238.67 399.00 40.60 313.40 7,658.00 485.00 2,912.79 2,874.16 158.57 28,361.15 2,730.88 227.65 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (2/21/2024 2:55 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 128176 5117 ASPEN MILLS 02/27/2024 1,917.80 128177 2886 AUSCO DESIGN AND MARKETING 02/27/2024 740.00 128178 1067 BERNICK'S 02/27/2024 5,094.85 128179 6368 BFF PROPERTIES 02/27/2024 11,300.00 128180 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & 02/27/2024 10,685.35 128181 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 02/27/2024 3,438.06 128182 1179 FIRE SAFETY USA INC 02/27/2024 104.00 128183 2075 FLAHERTY AND HOOD PA 02/27/2024 12,500.00 128184 5482 GRANITE ELECTRONICS, INC. 02/27/2024 490.10 128185 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 02/27/2024 33,982.54 128186 5974 JOTL PROPERTIES, LLC 02/27/2024 1,530.00 128187 3605 JR AND R II LLC 02/27/2024 12,500.00 128188 3187 MES - MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERV 02/27/2024 600.68 128189 2160 MINNESOTA POLLUTIION CONTROL 1 02/27/2024 5,900.00 128190 1369 MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF COMME] 02/27/2024 40.00 128191 2512 MONTICELLO PLBG HTG AC LLC 02/27/2024 115.00 128192 1913 NEW FRANCE WINE 02/27/2024 249.00 128193 5255 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC 02/27/2024 8,146.97 128194 6366 ORIGIN WINE & SPIRITS 02/27/2024 101.72 128195 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 02/27/2024 23,869.05 128196 1428 PINNACLE PUBLISHING, LLC 02/27/2024 334.20 128197 1455 RED'S MARATHON 02/27/2024 25.00 128198 6040 ROOF COMPANY NA INC 02/27/2024 250.00 128199 6367 MIKE SCHNEIDER 02/27/2024 375.00 128200 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPI] 02/27/2024 9,554.88 128201 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE 02/27/2024 2,144.53 128202 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC 02/27/2024 2,081.50 128203 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER 02/27/2024 92.00 Total for 2/27/2024: 1,092,731.79 Report Total (75 checks): 1,092,731.79 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 2/26/2024 Approved by: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (2/21/2024 2:55 PM) Page 2 City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments Prepared by: Human Resources Manager Reviewed by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date: 2/26/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ❑x Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to approve new hires and departures for city departments. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Council is asked to ratify the attached list of new hires and departures for the City. This listing includes full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary employees. The listing may also include status changes and promotions. I. Budget Impact: Positions are generally included in the budget. II. Staff Workload Impact: If new position, there may be some training involved. If terminated position, existing staff will cover hours as needed, until replacement. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of new hires and departures as identified on the attached list. SUPPORTING DATA • List of new hires and terminated employees. NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Haley Henke Lifeguard MCC 2/19/2024 PT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Effective Date Class Jack Geislinger Voluntary MCC 1/30/24 PT Erik Heuring Voluntary Parks 3/1/24 FT Gerald Hanson Voluntary Facilities 5/4/2024 FT New Hire and Terms City Council 2024: 2/21/2024 City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item N/A 2/26/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A N/A There is no report this City Council Cycle. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-14 approving the issuance of a lawful off - site gambling permit for the Monticello Lions for purse bingo at the American Legion Post 260 on April 13, 2024 Prepared by: City Clerk Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item 2/26/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED City Administrator Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-14 approving the issuance of a lawful off -site gambling permit for the Monticello Lions. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Monticello Lions Club has applied for an off -site gambling permit to conduct purse bingo at the American Legion Post 260, 304 Elm Street, on April 13, 2024. To receive a permit from the State, the City must approve the application. In the past, the City has not opposed these exempt gambling license applications for charitable events. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of the off -site gambling permit. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2024-14 B. Application CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-14 APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR OFF -SITE PREMISE PERMIT FOR MONTICELLO LIONS CLUB AT MONTICELLO AMERICAN LEGION POST 260,340 ELM STREET WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has received an application for an off -site gambling permit application of the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Permit filed by Jeanne Kordell/Monticello Lions Club; and WHEREAS, the Monticello Lions Club will be conducting off -site gambling at the Monticello American Legion Post 260 on April 13, 2024; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the application by the for the Monticello Lions Club to conduct off -site gambling at the American Legion Post 260, 304 Elm Street, Monticello, Minnesota on April 13, 2024. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 261" day of February, 2024. CITY OF MONTICELLO Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING LG230 Application to Conduct Off -Site Gambling ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Organization Name: Monticello Lions Address: PO Box 673 Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Name: Michael Jones Gambling Manager Name: Jeanne Kordell GAMBLING ACTIVITY 6/15 Page 1 of 2 No Fee License Number:01825 City: Monticello , MN zip: 55362 Daytime Phone: 763-248-8245 Daytime Phone: 612-207-6086 Twelve off -site events are allowed each calendar year not to exceed a total of 36 days. From —y—it-3—i to q 13 , Ixt Check the type of games that will be conducted: ❑✓ Raffle ❑Pull -Tabs ❑✓ Bingo ❑Tipboards ❑Paddlewheel GAMBLING PREMISES Name of location where gambling activity will be conducted: American Legion Post 260 Street address and City (or township): 304 Elm St, Monticello MN zip: 55362 County: Wright • Do not use a post office box. • If no street address, write in road designations (example: 3 miles east of Hwy. 63 on County Road 42). Does your organization own the gambling premises? Yes If yes, a lease is not required. �✓ No If no, the lease agreement below must be completed, and signed by the lessor. LEASE AGREEMENT FOR OFF -SITE ACTIVITY (a lease agreement is not required for raffles) Rent to be paid for the leased area: $ � (if none, write "0") All obligations and agreements between the organization and the lessor are listed below or attached. • Any attachments must be dated and signed by both the lessor and lessee. • This lease and any attachments is the total and only agreement between the lessor and the organization conducting lawful gambling activities. • Other terms, if any: Lessor's Signature: �A� Print Lessor's Lessor's Name: 45—S teal fI Date: W CONTINUE TO PAGE 2 LG230 Application to Conduct Off -Site Gambling Acknowledgment by Local Unit of Government: Approval by Resolution CITY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located within city limits City Name: Date Approved by City Council: Resolution Number: (If none, attach meeting minutes.) Signature of City Personnel: Title: Date Signed: Local unit of government must sign. COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located in a township County Name: Date Approved by County Board: Resolution Number: (If none, attach meeting minutes.) Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date Signed: TOWNSHIP NAME: 6/15 Page 2 of 2 Complete below only if required by the county. On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying to conduct gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minnesota Statutes 349.213, Subd. 2.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) ACKNOWLEDGMENT Date Signed: The person signing this application must be your organization's CEO and have their name on file with the Gambling Control Board. If the CEO has changed and the current CEO has not filed a LG200B Organization Officers Affidavit with the Gambling Control Board, he or she must do so at this time. I have read this plication, and all information is true, accurate, and complete and, if applicable, agree to the lease terms as stated in this a p ication. Signature of tEO (must be CEO's signature; designee may not sign) Date Mail or fax to: No attachments required. Minnesota Gambling Control Board Suite 300 South Questions? Contact a Licensing Specialist at 651-539-1900. 1711 West County Road B Roseville, MN 55113 Fax: 651-639-4032 This publication will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to supply the information; however, if your organization refuses to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your organization's qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your organization supplies the information requested, the Board will be able to process your organization's application. Your organization's name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All other information provided will be private data about your organization until the Board issues the permit. When the Board issues the permit, all information provided will become public. If the Board does not issue a permit, all information provided remains private, with the exception of your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about your organization are available to: Board members, Board staff whose work requires access to the information; Minnesota's Department of Public Safety; Attorney General; commissioners of Administration, Minnesota Management & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Auditor; national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this notice was given; and anyone with your written consent. An equal opportuity employer Consent Form Organization A listed below consents to Organization B conducting electronic gambling and/or bar bingo at the premises. Organization A: Organization B*: Name and Address of Permitted Premises: �3 d � �rv►� � , ,�/J GJ7� %`C-ill o� °U �31v� Premises Permit Number: Effective Date of Consent: �')Iy daY_evgl� 00�p 7,-_�), Circle One or Both: Electronic Pull -Tabs and/or Bar Ingo Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Signature, Organization A �z A ill' %1 Print Name Date: /✓ �", C3C�r5 i�e * Organization B: Provide the signed written consent to the Gambling Control Board with your pfemises permit application. This form is provided for convenience, but any written consent is accepted. Minnesota Gambling Control Board 711115 - 4 City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2E. Consideration of authorizing transfer of liquor license from Tricambra Food Inc. to Mattrerose Food LLC, dba Cornerstone Cafe & Catering located at 154 W. Broadwav, Monticello, MN Prepared by: City Clerk Reviewed by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date: 2/26/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to authorize the transfer of liquor license from Tricambra Food Inc. to Mattrerose Food LLC, dba Cornerstone Cafe & Catering, located at 154 W. Broadway. Approval is contingent on a favorable background check result. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City received an application for the transfer of an on -sale intoxicating liquor license currently held by Tricambra Food Inc., dba Cornerstone Cafe to Mattrerose Food LLC, dba Cornerstone Cafe & Catering. The applicant commented that she will be leasing the space and will begin doing business on March 1, 2024. If approved, Cornerstone Cafe & Catering will be allowed to serve liquor once the background check result is complete, and they are authorized by the State of Minnesota Alcohol & Gambling Division. The operation of the business will remain the same as under the previous owner, which includes an on -sale intoxicating liquor license. If approved, the application will be sent to the State Alcohol & Gambling Division for a stamp of approval, which allows the license holder to purchase alcohol from approved wholesalers. I. Budget Impact: The license fee was paid for the 2023-2024 license period. II. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A ��L�1�.i��Iu1►�iL�� _L��[�Ll Staff recommends approving the transfer pending a favorable background check. The new owner submitted all the necessary paperwork. SUPPORTING DATA • Redacted Application Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division (AGED) 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1600, St. Paul, MN 55 101 Alcohol & Gat"billig Entutcelt,0111 "Telephone 651-201-7507 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 Certification of an On Sale Liquor License, 3.2% Liquor license, or Sunday Liquor License Cities and Counties: You are required by law to complete and sign this form to certify the issuance of the following liquor license types: 1) City issued on sale intoxicating and Sunday liquor licenses 2) City and County issued 3.2% on and off sale malt liquor licenses Name of City or County Issuing Lior License Lice se Period From: k 'Ic "�N'pcnsion Revocation Cancel Circle One: New License -ense Transfer f (Iro i� i fn c r 41i ce �ise c I I a ((live dates) License type: (check all that apply) 216ll Sale Into'Xicating, L�rsunday Liquor E] 3.2% On sale M 3.2% Off Sale F'ec(s): On Sale License fee:$ Sunday License fee: $— 12% On Sale fee: $—3.2% Off Sale fee: S- Licensee Name: - ta DO ocial Security It T t- 4— k&- ow - (co 0 ioll. 11 I.I.C. or 4�ual) Business Trade Name CUfft/ ZXP!w (At" Address k L4 �N is - City Zip 6i'o- Code County V V40k L7:? -ne PitonI - liusiness Phone V3-2 I loi P I Ionic Address Cit Licensee's Federal Tax 11) # Licensee's 1VIN Tax 1D# If above named licens LUN C�l K111licri ffi erNanic (Fir! Partneriofficer Name (Fin- Partner/0 (ricer Name (First Middle Last) Doll Social Security ft I lome Address Intoxicating liquor licensees must attach a certificate of Liquor Liability Insurance to this lorni. 'rhe insurance certificate must contain all of the i*ollowing: 1) Show the exact licensee name (corporation, partnership, LLC, etc) and business address as shown on the license. 2) Cover completely the license period set by the local city or county licensing authority as shown on the license. rj Yes No During the past year has a summons been issued to the licensee under the Civil LiqLior Liability Law? Workers Compensation Insurance is also required by till licensees: Please complete the following: Workers Compensation Insurance Company Name: 17 Policy tt I Certify that this license(s) has been approved in an official meeting by the governing body of tile city or county. City Clerk or County AUL11tor Signature.-, (title) ON SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSEES ONLY, must also purchase a $20 Retailer Buyers Card. To obtain the application for the Buyers Card, please call 651-201-7507, or visit our -,vebsite at https://dps.mn.gov/ divisions/age/Pages/default.aspx City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-15 approving Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund Loan to Buchholz -Block 52 Holdings in the amount of $300.000 for Proiect Simpl Office Space at 101 West Broadwav Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Economic Development Manager 2/26/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Community Development Director, Finance Director, City Engineer ACTION REQUESTED Approved by: City Administrator Motion to adopt City Council Resolution 2024-15 authorizing a GMEF Loan to Block 52 Holdings, LLC in the amount of $300,000 for the Project Simpl office build -out at 101 West Broadway, contingent on completed loan analysis summary report by Riverwood Bank with satisfactory recommendation. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) is a revolving loan fund intended to encourage economic development by supplementing conventional financing sources available to existing and new businesses. The fund is administered by the Economic Development Authority (EDA), but state statute requires the elected City Council authorize loan agreements for amounts greater than $150,000. The current application is a $300,000 GMEF loan request from Block 52 Holdings, LLC for the purpose of completing the build out of office space in the new Block 52 building located at 101 West Broadway. A preliminary review of the loan request was presented to the Economic Development Authority (EDA) at its January 10, 2024, regular EDA meeting. The EDA directed staff to have various documents, including a Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Mortgage completed and presented for consideration at the February 14, 2024, meeting. The EDA authorized the GMEF loan at its regular meeting contingent on a satisfactory loan analysis report completed by Riverwood Bank and City Council approval. The proposed property improvements are for the build out of a 13,303 square foot office space on the ground floor of 101 West Broadway for Simplicity Group, a financial service and wealth enhancement firm. Simplicity Group is a national firm that decided to increase its scale and presence in the greater Twin Cities metro area. They committed to a ten-year lease and are expected to house 102 full-time employees at this location. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Block 52 Holdings previously secured financing from its lender and the EDA in the form of a TIF development agreement along with a gap funding "Authority Grant" to complete the majority of the $23,000,000 development. The buildout of the office space is a separate work component and financial consideration. The projected cost of the office buildout is $2,000,000 or $150.00 per square foot. Block 52 Holdings secured bank financing for 67.5 percent of the project cost and is contributing cash equity equal to 17.5 percent of the dollars needed to complete the build out. The entity is seeking a GMEF gap funding loan in the amount of $300,000 (15 percent) to cover the balance. A summary of the proposed funding sources for the buildout project is shown below. Sources Amount Percent Bank $1,350,000 67.50 Dev Cash Equity $ 350,000 17.50 GMEF Loan $ 300,000 15.00 Total $2,000,000 100.00 While the GMEF program has historically been more commonly used to fund manufacturing or other business -specific equipment, the proposed use of funds will support an influx of employment into the downtown during daytime hours. The improvements will enhance the significant investments, both public and private, on the block. The new workers downtown may also bring economic spin-off impacts to other businesses and existing and future restaurants near Block 52. The taxable market value of the entire property is likely to increase as well due to the significant additional improvements being completed at the building. Currently, the GMEF Loan Fund cash balance is approximately $1,056,105 +/-. The proposed use of the funding request is an eligible use of the funds. Riverwood Bank is completing a credit memo to ensure unnecessary risk in lending funds for this project is minimized to the EDA. However, as third mortgagor, the EDA is accepting an inherent level of risk. Since Block 52 Holdings is not responsible for creating the new jobs, it will be required to obtain information from Simplicity Group to complete annual reports documenting compliance with the Business Subsidy statute. Key loan terms are noted below: 1. Loan Amount: $300,000 (15 percent of the total project funding) 2. Loan Term = 25-year amortization with a 101" year balloon payment (120th month) 3. Interest Rate = Fixed; 3.5 percent 4. Collateral = 3rd Real Estate Mortgage 5. Loan Close Date = TBD 6. Deferral Period: Principal and interest loan payments to start November 1, 2024; interest will accrue from funding draw dates City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 7. Job Creation = 50 full time equivalent (FTE) jobs due to GMEF Loan funding 8. Loan Origination Fee = 1.5 percent; $4,500 Additionally, the borrower requests a waiver of the GMEF Loan Policy language regarding interest rates in asking for 3.0 percent rate. The EDA and the City have the authority to deviate from the policy if they determine it is beneficial to desired outcomes. The policy language indicates that interest rates should be two points below the "Wall Street Journal (WSJ) Prime Rate." The WSJ Prime Rate is currently 8.5 percent meaning the GMEF loan would carry a rate of 6.5 percent. There is currently widespread belief that Federal Reserve will begin reducing fed funds rates in 2024 (the Fed raised interest rates 11 times since March 2022 with goal of reducing inflation). In that context, it is reasonable for the borrower to seek a fixed rate that is more in line with soon (over the next 18 to 24 months) to be expected rates. The staff recommended 3.5 percent loan rate is slightly below the current ten-year treasury rate of 4.07 percent. The agreements drafted for EDA consideration currently include the 3.5 percent rate. The loan documents presented for the EDA review and consideration include the following: • Loan Agreement • Mortgage Agreement • Promissory Note Per Minnesota State statutes, the EDA held a Business Subsidy public hearing for this item at its February 14, 2024, meeting. No public comments were offered at the meeting. While the City Council is required to authorize the loan agreement because the loan amount is more than $150,000, the Council does not need to hold a second public hearing on the loan request. Factors relevant for the Business Subsidy consist of job creation and additional tax base due to the building improvement project. Budget Impact: The budget impact from the proposed GMEF Loan request is a direct reduction in the balance of the loan fund. The funding would draw the Fund down to $756,105 +/-. The fund remains in compliance with the GMEF Policy for fund balance. Potential future loans may be constrained in amount due to the size of this request if approved by the EDA, but that is a variable risk. Attorney fees and loan review - underwriting fees were incurred in the review of the loan application, though most if not all of those costs will be passed onto the applicant -borrower. II. Staff Workload Impact: The Economic Development Manager committed time to completing tasks related to the review of the proposed loan request. Additional time toward this effort involves report preparation and EDA meeting presentation. No other staff are required to complete the work in this effort. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Economic Development section of the Comprehensive Plan encourages formation of an effective economic development effort which creates a City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 supportive business environment and builds a vibrant, thriving local economy. The Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan's Vision and Values statements support a vibrant Downtown, and the 2017 Downtown Small Area Plan specifically notes a mix of uses is critical, including those active at varying times of day. Utilization of the various EDA funding programs and tools for quality proposals is an actionable step in fulfilling the Vision and Downtown Small Area Plan's objectives. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend approval of the GMEF Loan request from Block 52 Holdings, contingent on a satisfactory recommendation resulting from the completed Credit Memo findings by Riverwood Bank. The proposed loan meets the general intent of the GMEF Loan Policies. The gap loan request is a critical component of the buildout proposal. The community's economic benefits include significant new job creation in the Downtown, and an increase in the tax base. A review using the Development Assistance Worksheet Scoring form indicates the proposal carries a score of 33.5. This is comparable to UMC and Wiha Tools' recent expansion scores. Riverwood Bank's Credit Memo will help the EDA understand the likelihood of loan performance based on property cash flow and the financial capacity of the borrower (property ownership group) to service the debt associated with the project. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2024-15 B. Loan Agreement C. Promissory Note D. Mortgage Agreement E. GMEF Loan Application F. 2023 Year End EDA Financial Statements G. Business Subsidy Statute CITY OF MONTICELLO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. — 2024-15 RESOLUTION APPROVING A GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND LOAN BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO BLOCK 52 HOLDINGS LLC, BUCHHOLZ EXCHANGE LLC AND NORGREN EXCHANGE LLC, WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello (the "City") has received a proposal from Block 52 Holdings LLC, Buchholz Exchange LLC, and Norgren Exchange LLC, each a Minnesota limited liability company (together, the "Borrower"), that the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") enter into Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement" and together with related documents, the "Loan Documents") in connection with a loan to the Borrower in the amount of $300,000 (the "Loan"), pursuant to the EDA's Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (the "Program"), created to assist businesses in the City with financing certain economic development activities to meet the goals set forth in the guidelines approved by the EDA for the Program (the "Guidelines"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Program, the Guidelines and the Loan Documents, the Borrower intends to use the Loan to build out approximately 13,303 square feet of commercial office space for use by Simplicity Financial Marketing Holdings Inc, a Delaware corporation, at the real property owned by the Borrower located at 101 West Broadway Street in the City; and WHEREAS, after a duly noticed public hearing held on February 14, 2024, the EDA approved the Loan and the Loan Documents, copies of which are on file with the City Clerk. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello as follows: Section 1. Business Subsidv. 1.01. The Loan constitutes a business subsidy within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 1161993 to 1161995, as amended (the "Business Subsidy Act"), and the Loan Agreement includes a "business subsidy agreement" as required under the Business Subsidy Act. 1.02. The City has adopted a Business Subsidy Policy (the "Subsidy Policy"), which sets the general criteria for all types of subsidies granted by the EDA, all as required under the Business Subsidy Act. 1.03. On February 14, 2024, the EDA held a public hearing on the Loan in accordance with the Business Subsidy Act. Section 2. Consent. 2.01 In accordance with Section 116J.994, Subd. 3(d) of the Business Subsidy Act, the City hereby approves the Loan Agreement including the business subsidy agreement provided therein and consents to the EDA entering into the Loan Documents with the Borrower. 2.02 The City hereby approves the Loan in accordance with the Loan Documents in substantially the forms on file with the City's Economic Development Director together such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by legal counsel to the EDA and by the President and Executive Director of the EDA prior to executing said documents and the City further; and said officers are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the EDA. The execution of any instrument by the President and Executive Director shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such document in accordance with the terms hereof. Approved by the City Council of the City of Monticello this _ day of , 2024. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk MN325\52\930672.v1 I1117.1QVEX" 9D)DIuIDIeIIY This Loan Agreement ("Agreement") is made this _ day of February, 2024, between BLOCK 52 HOLDINGS LLC, BUCHHOLZ EXCHANGE LLC, and NORGREN EXCHANGE LLC, each a Minnesota limited liability company (individuals, each a `Borrower Entity" and collectively, and jointly and severally, the "Borrower"), and the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Lender"), a public body corporate and politic and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota. RECITALS A. The Lender has created the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (the "Program"), a revolving loan fund program to assist businesses in the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") with financing certain economic development activities to meet the goals set forth in the guidelines approved by the Lender for the Program (the "Guidelines"). B. The Borrower has submitted a loan application (the "Application") and the Lender has approved a loan to the Borrower in the maximum principal amount of $300,000 (the "Loan") to pay a portion of the costs related to the improvement and the build out by the Borrower of approximately 13,303 square feet of commercial office space (the "Project") for use by Simplicity Financial Marketing Holdings Inc, a Delaware corporation (the "Tenant"), at the real property located at 101 West Broadway Street in the City (the "Property") legally described in Exhibit A attached to the Mortgage (as hereinafter defined). The Loan will be evidenced by a Promissory Note, dated as of the date hereof (the "Note"), issued by Borrower in favor of the Lender, and secured by (i) a Mortgage, dated as of the date hereof (the "Mortgage" and together with this Agreement, the Note, the "Loan Documents"), from Borrower to the Lender. C. The Loan constitutes a business subsidy within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 1161993 to 1161995, as amended (the "Business Subsidy Act"), and the Lender has adopted criteria for awarding business subsidies that comply with the Business Subsidy Act after a public hearing for which notice was published in accordance with the Business Subsidy Act. D. The Lender has held a duly noticed public hearing on the business subsidy provided as represented by the Loan and this Agreement constitutes a subsidy agreement under the Business Subsidy Act. E. The Lender now makes the Loan to the Borrower subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. ACCORDINGLY, to induce the Lender to make the Loan to the Borrower and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Loan Amount. Subject to and upon the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Guidelines, the Application and the other Loan Documents, the Lender agrees to loan to the Borrower the sum of Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($300,000.00), or so much thereof as is disbursed to the Borrower in accordance with this Agreement. Proceeds of the Loan (the "Proceeds") shall be disbursed in accordance with Section 3 hereof. MN325\52\928808.v2 2. Repavment of Loan. The Loan shall be evidenced by the Note payable by the Borrower to the Lender. The interest rate on the principal amount outstanding on the Note shall be fixed at 3.50% per annum. The Note shall be repaid in accordance with the Note. The Borrower may prepay the principal of the Note plus accrued interest thereon, in whole or in part, on any date as set forth in the Note. Disbursement of Loan Proceeds. (a) The Proceeds shall be disbursed in a single lump sum on a reimbursement basis. Prior to disbursement, the Borrower shall have delivered the following to the Lender: (i) Loan Documents. The Borrower having delivered to the Lender, without expense to the Lender, executed copies of the Loan Documents, together with evidence that the Mortgage has been or will be duly filed for record; (ii) Cost Certificate. A sworn certificate detailing costs and sources of funds to be utilized for the Project ("Cost Certificate") in a form acceptable to the Lender, showing an itemized breakdown of. (i) the source and amount of all Project funds; and (ii) of the total cost of the Project. At least 70% of the Project funds must come from a source other than the Loan; (iii) Evidence of Pavment and Lien Waivers. Evidence in the form of paid invoices, statements, or similar and accompanying lien waivers, if applicable, that are acceptable to the Lender, that the Borrower has paid costs of the Project in an amount at least equal to the amount of the Loan; (iii) FinancinLy. The Borrower having provided to the Lender copies of the Borrower's primary lender documents; (iv) Borrower Documents. The Borrower having provided copies of the Borrower's organizational documents, including, if applicable, articles of incorporation or articles of organization, a certificate of good standing issued by the Minnesota Secretary of State, an Employer Identification Number (EIl) certificate and evidence that the Borrower has a city, state, or federal license to do business or relevant professional license; (v) Insurance. The Borrower having delivered to the Lender a certificate or policy for all insurance required, under the terms hereof, to be maintained by the Borrower; (v) Fees. The Borrower having paid to the Lender a Loan origination fee of 1.50% of the Loan and all charges associated with the Loan, including, but not limited to: (i) Lender's attorneys' fees; and (ii) filing fees of any instruments required under this Agreement within 30 days of the Lender providing written notice to the Borrower of Lender's costs. (vi) Compliance with Laws. Etc. The Borrower shall have delivered to the Lender such evidence as the Lender may require as to the compliance of the Property with: (i) all applicable laws, codes, rules, regulations and ordinances, including, without limitation, those relative to environmental protection, protection of wetlands, building and zoning matters and the Americans with Disabilities Act; and (ii) the requirements of any restrictive covenants, conditions and restrictions; conditional use permit or planned unit development applicable to the Property; (vii) Resolutions. Each Borrower Entity shall have delivered to the Lender a copy of the resolutions of its Board of Governors, duly certified by its company secretary, authorizing the MN325\52\928808.v2 2 execution, delivery, and performance of, and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Loan Documents; and (viii) Title Insurance. The Borrower, at its sole expense, will cause a title insurance company qualified to do business in the State of Minnesota and acceptable to the Lender to deliver to the Lender the title insurer's commitment to issue a title insurance policy, ALTA Loan Policy, in the amount of $300,000 effective as of the date of closing, ensuring to the Lender that: The Borrower is the owner of the Property; 2. The Property is free and clear of all other liens, charges, and encumbrances except those disclosed in the Title Commitment and Attachments; 3. A Comprehensive Endorsement, a usury endorsement, a zoning endorsement, and an access endorsement are provided; and 4. The policy will be issued free and clear of the standard printed title exceptions and exceptions to coverage as shown in the Title Commitment, including (i) encroachments, boundary line disputes, and other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey; (ii) any state of facts that exists after the date of the Title Commitment; (iii) easements or claims of easements not disclosed by public records; (iv) rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; (v) any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, or material furnished prior to or after this Agreement, whether shown by the public records or otherwise; (vi) taxes and special assessments not shown as existing liens by public records; and (vii) free and clear of any other objections, encumbrances, or exceptions to title. The Lender will have ten (10) business days from the receipt of the Title Commitment to notify the Borrower of any defect in title or any other title related matter deemed unacceptable to the Lender. The Borrower will have twenty (20) business days from receipt of said notice from the Lender to cure the defect(s). If the Borrower is not able to cure said defects in that period, the Lender may, in its sole discretion, cancel this Agreement, and have no further obligation to the Borrower under this Agreement. (b) Upon receipt by the Lender of the items required pursuant to this section hereof in the form and condition required therein, the Lender agrees to disburse the Proceeds to the Borrower in an amount not to exceed the lesser of (a) 30% of the total Project cost as evidenced by the Cost Certificate, or (b) the Loan amount. 4. Representations and Warranties. The Borrower Entities each warrant and represent to the Lender that: (a) The Borrower Entities are each a limited liability company under the laws of Minnesota and is duly authorized and empowered to execute, deliver, and perform this Agreement and to borrow money from the Lender. (b) The execution and delivery of this Agreement, and the performance by the Borrower of its obligations hereunder, do not and will not violate or conflict with any provision of law and do not and will not violate or conflict with, or cause any default or event of default to occur under, any agreement binding upon the Borrower. MN325\52\928808.v2 3 (c) The execution and delivery of this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Borrower and constitutes its lawful and binding obligation, legally enforceable against it. (d) The Borrower warrants that it shall keep and maintain books, records, and other documents relating directly to the receipt and disbursements of the Proceeds and that any duly authorized representative of the Lender shall, at all reasonable times, have access to and the right to inspect, copy, audit, and examine all such books, records, and other documents of the Borrower pertaining to the Loan for 6 years after the date hereof. Upon request, the Borrower Entities shall each provide the Lender with their current balance sheets, statements of income and annual audited financial statements. (e) The Borrower warrants that it has fully complied with all applicable local, state and federal laws and ordinances pertaining to its business, the Project and the Property, and will continue to comply throughout the terms of this Agreement. If at any time the Borrower receives notice of noncompliance from any governmental entity, the Borrower agrees to notify the Lender of such noncompliance and take any necessary action to comply with the local, state or federal requirement in question. (f) The Borrower warrants that it will use the Proceeds solely for the costs of the Project. (g) The Borrower warrants that it will not create, permit to be created, or allow to exist any liens, charges, or encumbrances prior to the obligation created by this Agreement, except as otherwise authorized in writing by the Lender. Anything above to the contrary notwithstanding, Borrower at its expense may contest, by appropriate legal proceedings conducted in good faith and with due diligence, the amount or validity or application, in whole or in part, of any such lien or encumbrance provided that (a) the collection thereof from the Borrower, the Lender and the Property shall be suspended during the period of such contest, (b) neither the Property nor any part thereof or interest therein would be in any danger, deemed substantial by the Lender, of being sold, forfeited or lost, and (c) the Lender shall be furnished such security, if any, as may be required in the contest or reasonably requested by the Lender. The Borrower shall give prompt written notice to the Lender of the commencement of any contest referred to in the preceding sentence. (h) The Borrower will comply with all state and local laws pertaining to licensing, building codes, zoning, and environmental requirements. The Borrower represents that it does not have delinquent taxes, bills, fines or other charges due to the City. The Borrower represents and certifies that the Project is a conforming or legally nonconforming use under the current zoning regulations of the City. (i) The Borrower shall promptly keep, perform and comply with all of the terms, covenants and conditions to be kept and performed by the Borrower, as required by the City and any other governmental body having jurisdiction over the Property; keep unimpaired the rights of the Borrower under any permit or agreement issued or made by the City or other governmental body having jurisdiction over the Property; and to enforce the prompt performance of all of the terms, covenants and conditions to be kept and performed by the City or other governmental body having jurisdiction over the Property, respectively, under any permits or agreements issued or made by the City or such other governmental bodies, and any contractors under all contracts obtained or held by the Borrower in connection with the operation of the Borrower's business. 0) During the term of this Agreement, the Borrower shall procure and maintain or cause to be procured and maintained at its sole expense, casualty insurance, public liability insurance and such other types of insurance as are reasonably required by the Lender from time to time, with coverages and in amounts normally held by owners of property similar to the Property and with companies satisfactory to the Lender. The policy or policies or duly executed certificate or certificates for such insurance and renewals or replacements thereof shall be deposited with the Lender. MN325\52\928808.v2 4 (k) No litigation, tax claims or governmental proceedings are pending or threatened against the Borrower or the Property, and no judgment or order of any court or administrative agency is outstanding against the Borrower or the Property which would have a material adverse effect on the Borrower or the Property. (1) Unless otherwise previously disclosed to the Lender in writing, the Borrower has not entered into or granted any security agreements or permitted the filing or attachment of any mortgage on the Property that would be prior or that may in any way be superior to the Lender's Mortgage. The Lender is aware that there is a first and second lien mortgage on the Property ahead of the Lender's Mortgage. To allow the Lender protect its interests and monitor its collateral, the Borrower shall allow the Lender to inquire about the status of the primary loan(s) throughout the term of this Agreement. (m) The Borrower understands and agrees that the Lender is relying upon the above representations and warranties in extending the Loan to the Borrower. The Borrower further agrees that the foregoing representations and warranties shall be continuing in nature and shall remain in full force and effect until such time as the Loan and Note shall be paid in full, or until this Agreement shall be terminated in the manner provided above, whichever is the last to occur. (n) The Borrower shall at all times comply with the Guidelines. (o) None of the Borrower Entities shall (a) Engage in any business activities substantially different than those in which the Borrower is presently engaged; (b) cease operations, liquidate, merge or consolidate with any other entity; (c) sell, assign or transfer any of the assets of the Borrower which are related to the Borrower's business, except in the ordinary course of business; or (d) purchase or retire any of Borrower's outstanding shares or alter or amend Borrower's capital structure. Business Subsidv. (a) Public Purpose. In order to satisfy the provisions of the Business Subsidy Act, the Borrower acknowledges and agrees that the amount of the "Business Subsidy" granted to the Borrower under this Agreement is the Loan, and that the Business Subsidy is needed because the Project is not sufficiently feasible for the Borrower to undertake without the Business Subsidy due to the extraordinary costs site improvements. The public purpose of the Business Subsidy is to redevelop land in the City's downtown which is underutilized or characterized by blight, increase the tax base of the City and the State, and increase jobs in the City and State (including construction jobs). (b) Operation of Site. The Borrower shall cause the Tenant to operate the Project as an insurance office (the "Qualified Facility") for at least 5 years after the Benefit Date (defined hereinafter). The improvements will be a Qualified Facility as long as the Project is operated by the Borrower for the aforementioned qualified uses. During any period when the Project is vacant and not operated for the aforementioned qualified uses, the Project will not constitute a Qualified Facility. (c) Job and Waee Goals. The `Benefit Date" of the assistance provided in this Agreement is the earlier of the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion or the date the Project is occupied by Tenant. By or before the "Compliance Date", defined as the date two years after the Benefit Date, the Borrower shall cause the Tenant to (i) create at least 50 full-time jobs, new to Minnesota (not relocated from another Minnesota office location), permanent to the Property, and (ii) cause the hourly wage of the new jobs to be at least $12.39 per hour, with benefits equal to at least $1.75 an hour. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if the wage and job goals described in this paragraph are met by the Compliance Date, those goals are deemed satisfied despite the Borrower's continuing obligations under Section 5(b). The Lender may, after a public hearing, extend the Compliance Date by up to one year, MN325\52\928808.v2 5 provided that nothing in this section will be construed to limit the Authority's legislative discretion regarding this matter. (d) Remedies. If the Borrower fails to meet the goals described in Section 5(b) and 5(c), the Borrower shall repay to the Lender upon written demand from the Lender a "pro rata share" of the outstanding principal amount of the Loan together with interest on that amount at the implicit price deflator as provided in Section 116J.994, subd. 6 of the Business Subsidy Act, accrued from the date of substantial completion of the Project to the date of payment. The term "pro rata share" means percentages calculated as follows: (i) if the failure relates to the number of jobs, the jobs required less the jobs created, divided by the jobs required; (ii) if the failure relates to wages, the number of jobs required less the number of jobs that meet the required wages, divided by the number of jobs required; (iii) if the failure relates to maintenance of the facility as a Qualified Facility in accordance with Section 5(b), 60 less the number of months of operation as a Qualified Facility (where any month in which the Qualified Facility is in operation for at least 15 days constitutes a month of operation), commencing on the Benefit Date and ending with the date the Qualified Facility ceases operation as determined by the Lender, divided by 60; and (iv) if more than one of clauses (i) through (iii) apply, the sum of the applicable percentages, not to exceed 100%. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to limit the Lender's remedies under Section 7 hereof. In addition to the remedy described in this Section and any other remedy available to the Lender for failure to meet the goals stated in Section 5, the Borrower agrees and understands that it may not receive a business subsidy from the Lender or any grantor (as defined in the Business Subsidy Act) for a period of 5 years from the date of the failure or until the Borrower satisfies its repayment obligation under this Section, whichever occurs first. (e) Reports. The Borrower must submit to the Lender a written report regarding business subsidy goals and results by no later than February 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2025 and continuing until the later of (i) the date the goals stated in Section 5(b) and (c) are met; (ii) 30 days after expiration of the period described in Section 5(b); or (iii) if the goals are not met, the date the subsidy is repaid in accordance with Section 5(d). The report must comply with Section 116J.994, subdivision 7 of the Business Subsidy Act. The Lender will provide information to the Borrower regarding the required forms. If the Borrower fails to timely file any report required under this Section, the Lender will mail the Borrower a warning within one week after the required filing date. If, after 14 days of the postmarked date of the warning, the Borrower fails to provide a report, the Borrower must pay to the Lender a penalty of $100 for each subsequent day until the report is filed. The maximum aggregate penalty payable under this Section is $1,000. (f) Other assistance. In addition to the Loan, the Lender is providing the Land Write Down, the TIF Note and the Authority Grant and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development is providing the DEED Grant, as all such terms are defined in that certain Purchase and Development Contract, dated September 16, 2022, by and between the Lender and the Borrower. (g) Parent Corporation. None of the Borrowers have parent corporations. MN325\52\928808.v2 6 Event of Default by Borrower. The following shall be Events of Default under this Agreement: (a) failure to pay any principal or interest on the Loan when due; (b) any representation or warranty made by the Borrower herein or in any document, instrument, or certificate given in connection with the Loan Documents that is false when made; (c) Failure by the Borrower to pay its debts as they become due, or if the Borrower makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, admits in writing its inability to pay its debts as they become due, files a petition under any chapter of the Federal Bankruptcy Code or any similar law, state or federal, now or hereafter existing, becomes "insolvent" as that term is generally defined under the Federal Bankruptcy Code, files an answer admitting insolvency or inability to pay its debts as they become due in any involuntary bankruptcy case commenced against it, or fails to obtain a dismissal of such case within thirty (30) days after its commencement or convert the case from one chapter of the Federal Bankruptcy Code to another chapter, or be the subject of an order for relief in such bankruptcy case, or be adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent, or has a custodian, trustee, or receiver appointed for, or has any court take jurisdiction of its property, or any part thereof, in any proceeding for the purpose of reorganization, arrangement, dissolution, or liquidation, and such custodian, trustee, or receiver is not discharged, or such jurisdiction is not relinquished, vacated, or stayed within thirty (30) days of the appointment; (d) a garnishment summons or writ of attachment is issued against or served upon the Lender for the attachment of any property of the Borrower in the Lender's possession or any indebtedness owing to the Borrower, unless appropriate papers are filed by the Borrower contesting the same within thirty (30) days after the date of such service or such shorter period of time as may be reasonable in the circumstances; (e) any breach or failure of the Borrower to perform any other term or condition of this Agreement or the Loan Documents not specifically described as an Event of Default in this Agreement or the Loan Documents, and such breach or failure continues for a period of fifteen (15) days after the Lender has given written notice to the Borrower specifying such default or breach, unless the Lender agrees in writing to an extension of such time prior to its expiration; provided, however, if the failure stated in the notice cannot be corrected within the applicable period, the Lender will not unreasonably withhold its consent to an extension of such time if corrective action is instituted by the Borrower within the applicable period and is being diligently pursued until the Default is corrected, but no such extension shall be given for an Event of Default that can be cured by the payment of money (i.e., payment of taxes, insurance premiums, or other amounts required to be paid hereunder); (f) the Borrower takes any of the actions set forth in Section 9 hereof, and (g) any breach by Borrower of any other agreement between Borrower and Lender, or Borrower and the City. 7. Lender's Remedies upon Borrower's Default. Upon an Event of Default by the Borrower and after provision by the Lender of written notice, if the Borrower has failed to remedy such default within the period specified above, the Lender shall have the right to exercise any or all of the following remedies (and any other rights and remedies available to it): (a) declare the principal amount of the Loan and any accrued interest thereon to be immediately due and payable upon providing written notice to the Borrower; (b) suspend its performance under this Agreement; MN325\52\928808.v2 7 (c) take any action provided for at law to enforce compliance by the Borrower with the terms of this Agreement and the Note; (d) foreclose on the Mortgage; (e) exercise its remedies under the Mortgage. In addition to any other amounts due on the Loan, and without waiving any other right of the Lender under any this Agreement or any other instrument securing the Loan applicable documents, the Borrower shall pay to the Lender a late fee of $250 for any payment not received in full by the Lender within 30 calendar days of the date on which it is due. Furthermore, interest will continue to accrue on any amount due until the date on which it is paid to the Lender, and all such interest will be due and payable at the same time as the amount on which it has accrued. 8. Lender's Costs of Enforcement of Agreement. If an Event of Default has occurred as provided herein, then upon demand by the Lender, the Borrower shall pay or reimburse the Lender for all expenses, including all attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Lender in connection with the enforcement of this Agreement and the Note, or in connection with the protection or enforcement of the interests and collateral security of the Lender in any litigation or bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding or in any action or proceeding relating in any way to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Earlv Renavment. The Loan will be immediately due and payable if - (a) the Borrower or its owners sells or otherwise transfers any or part or his/her interest in the Property; (b) the Borrower fails to comply with the Guidelines; or (c) the Tenant ceases operations, reduces services or significantly alters the Project within five years of the date hereof. 10. Indemnification. (a) The Borrower shall and does hereby agree, jointly and severally, to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold the Lender and the City, and their respective officers, agents, and employees, harmless of and from any and all liability, loss, or damage that it may incur under or by reason of this Agreement, and of and from any and all claims and demands whatsoever that may be asserted against the Lender by reason of any alleged obligations or undertakings on its part to perform or discharge any of the terms, covenants, or agreements contained herein. (b) Should the Lender or the City, or their respective officers, agents, or employees, incur any such liability or be required to defend against any claims or demands pursuant to Section 10, or should a judgment be entered against the Lender, the amount thereof, including costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys' fees, shall bear interest thereon at the rate then in effect on the Note, shall be secured hereby, shall be added to the Loan, and the Borrower, jointly and severally, shall reimburse the Lender for the same immediately upon demand, and upon the failure of the Borrower to do so, the Lender may declare the Loan immediately due and payable. (c) This indemnification and hold harmless provision shall survive the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement and the creation and payment of any indebtedness to the Lender. The MN325\52\928808.v2 8 Borrower waives notice of the acceptance of this Agreement by the Lender. (d) Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of or limitation on any immunity from or limitation on liability to which the Lender is entitled under law. 11. Joint and Several Obligations. All obligations of the Borrower Entities under this Loan Agreement shall be and are joint and several obligations. 12. Miscellaneous. (a) Waiver. The performance or observance of any promise or condition set forth in this Agreement may be waived, amended, or modified only by a writing signed by the Borrower and the Lender. No delay in the exercise of any power, right, or remedy operates as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any other power, right, or remedy. (b) Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Borrower and its successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the Lender and its successors and assigns. All rights and powers specifically conferred upon the Lender may be transferred or delegated by the Lender to any of its successors and assigns. The Borrower's rights and obligations under this Agreement may be assigned only when such assignment is approved in writing by the Lender. (c) Governing Law. This Agreement is made and shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Minnesota, and all parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or otherwise. (d) Severability. If any provision or application of this Agreement is held unlawful or unenforceable in any respect, such illegality or unenforceability shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect, and this Agreement shall be construed as if the unlawful or unenforceable provision or application had never been contained herein or prescribed hereby. (e) Notice. All notices required hereunder shall be given by depositing in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, first-class mail, return receipt requested, to the following addresses (or such other addresses as either parry may notify the other): To Lender: City of Monticello Economic Development Authority 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Attn: Executive Director To Borrower: Block 52 Holding LLC 4510 3rd Street S. Moorhead, MN 56560 Buchholz Exchange LLC 4379 33rd Avenue S. #121 Fargo, ND 58104 Norgren Exchange LLC 4379 33rd Avenue S. #121 Fargo, ND 58104 MN325\52\928808.v2 (� To Tenant: Simplicity Financial Marketing Holdings Inc 222 South 9' Street, Suite 450 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (f) Termination. If the Loan is not disbursed pursuant to this Agreement within 180 days of approval of the Loan by the Board of the Commissioners of the Lender (the "Board"), this Agreement shall terminate and neither party shall have any further obligation to the other, except that if the Loan is not disbursed because the Borrower has failed to use its best efforts to comply with the conditions set forth in Section 3 of this Agreement then the Borrower shall pay to the Lender all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by the Lender in connection with this Agreement and the Note. The 180 days may be extended up to an additional 120 days if an extension request is (i) received at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the 180 days and (ii) approved by the Board. Provided the Loan is disbursed within the required timeframe, this Agreement shall terminate on the later of the Maturity Date (as defined in the Note) or the date that the Loan has been paid in full (the "Termination Date"). Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the indemnification provisions provided in Section 10 hereof shall not terminate on the Termination Date. (g) Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with any exhibits attached hereto, which are incorporated by reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of all mutual understandings between the parties with respect to this Agreement, superseding all prior or contemporaneous proposals, communications, and understandings, whether oral or written, concerning the Loan. (h) Headings. The headings appearing at the beginning of the several sections contained in this Agreement have been inserted for identification and reference purposes only and shall not be used in the construction and interpretation of this Agreement. (i) Recording of Documents. The Mortgage shall be recorded with the county on which the Property is located and all costs of such recording shall be paid by the Borrower. 0) Electronic Simatures; Execution in Counterparts. The electronic signature of the parties to this Agreement shall be as valid as an original signature of such party and shall be effective to bind the parties hereto. For purposes hereof, (i) "electronic signature" means a manually signed original signature that is then transmitted by electronic means; and (ii) "transmitted by electronic means" means sent in the form of a facsimile or sent via the internet as a portable document format ("pdf') or other replicating image attached to an electronic mail or internet message. This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. (k) Data Practices. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of the Borrower's performance of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, and any other applicable state statutes, any state rules adopted to implement the Act and statutes, as well as federal statutes and regulations on data privacy. (1) Accounting and Records. The Borrower agrees to establish and maintain complete, accurate and detailed accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of all funds received under this Agreement. Such accounts and records shall be kept and maintained by the Borrower for a period of six (6) years following the Termination Date. Accounting methods shall be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. MN325\52\928808.v2 10 (m) Audits. The accounts and records of the Borrower described in paragraph (1) above shall be audited in the same manner as all other accounts and records of the Borrower and may, for a period of six (6) years following the Termination Date, be inspected on the Borrower's premises by the Authority or individuals or organizations designated by the Authority, upon reasonable notice thereof to the Borrower. The books, records, documents and accounting procedures relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the State Auditor in accordance with Minnesota law. MN325\52\928808.v2 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the proper officers thereunto duly authorized on the day and year first written above. LENDER: CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By: President By: Executive Director [SIGNATURE PAGE TO LOAN AGREEMENT — CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY] MN325\52\928808.v2 I:113 9:1111VAIJ D)k"; BLOCK 52 HOLDINGS LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its BUCHHOLZ EXCHANGE LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Dale Buchholz Its NORGREN EXCHANGE LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Steve Norgren Its MN325\52\928808.v2 S-1 The Loan Agreement, including the business subsidy agreement contain in section 5 hereof, is acknowledged and consented to by the Tenant. TENANT: SIMPLICITY FINANCIAL MARKETING HOLDINGS INC. go Its MN325\52\928808.v2 S-2 1*141,111.11W.1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION That property located in the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, Block 52 First Addition. MN325\52\928808.v2 A-1 PROMISSORY NOTE $300,000 February _, 2024 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, BLOCK 52 HOLDING LLC, BUCHHOLZ EXCHANGE LLC, and NORGREN EXCHANGE LLC, each a Minnesota limited liability company (each a "Borrower Entity" and, collectively, the "Borrower"), for value received, hereby promises to pay to the CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota (the "Lender") (Lender and any holder of this Note from time to time are each hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Holder"), 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, or such other place as may be designated from time to time in writing by the Holder hereof, the principal sum of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND and no/100ths Dollars ($300,000) or so much thereof as may be advanced under this Note (the "Loan"), pursuant to the terms of a Loan Agreement between the Borrower and the Lender of even date herewith (the "Loan Agreement"), together with interest thereon at the rate of 3.50% per annum from the date of this Promissory Note (the "Note"), in any coin or currency which at the time or times of payment is legal tender for the payment of private debts in the United States of America. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Loan Agreement. The principal and interest of this Note is payable as follows: 1. Interest at the rate of 3.50% per annum shall accrue on the principal amount outstanding on the Note. The Borrower shall make level payments of principal and interest beginning on November 1, 2024 (the "Initial Payment Date"), and continue on the first day of each and every month thereafter until paid in full. Such payments shall fully amortize the principal and interest over twenty-five (25) years; provided that the final payment of unpaid principal and interest shall be due and payable on October 1, 2034 (the "Maturity Date"). 2. The Borrower may prepay the principal of the Note plus accrued interest thereon, in whole or in part, on any date without premium or penalty. 3. In addition to any other amounts due on the Loan Amount, and without waiving any other right of Lender under the Loan Documents, Borrower shall pay to Lender a late fee of $250.00 for any payment not received in full by Lender within 16 calendar days of the date on which it is due. Furthermore, interest will continue to accrue on any amount due until the date on which it is paid to Lender, and all such interest will be due and payable at the same time as the amount on which it has accrued. 4. This Note evidences the Loan and is given pursuant to the Loan Agreement. The repayment of this Notie is secured by the Mortgage. All of the agreements, conditions, covenants, provisions, and stipulations contained in the Loan Agreement, the Mortgage, or any other instrument securing this Note are hereby made a part of this Note to the same extent and with the same force and effect as if they were fully set forth herein. It is agreed that time is of the essence of this Note. If an Event of Default occurs hereunder, under the Loan Agreement or any other instrument securing this Note, then Lender may at its right and option, pursuant to a notice of default, declare immediately due and payable the principal balance of this Note and interest accrued thereon, together with any costs of collection including attorney fees incurred by Lender in collecting or enforcing payment hereof, whether suit be brought or not, and all other sums due hereunder or under the Loan Agreement. The remedies of the Lender as provided herein, and in the Loan Agreement, the Mortgage, or any other instrument securing this Note shall be cumulative and concurrent and may be pursued singly, successively, or together, and, at the sole discretion of the Lender, may be exercised as often as occasion therefor shall occur; and the failure to exercise any such right or remedy shall in no event be construed as a waiver or release thereof. The Lender shall not be deemed, by any act of omission or commission, to have waived any of its rights or remedies hereunder unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the Lender and then only to the extent specifically set forth in the writing. A waiver with reference to one event shall not be construed as continuing or as a bar to or waiver of any right or remedy as to a subsequent event. This Note may not be amended, modified, or changed except only by an instrument in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of any such amendment, modifications, or change is sought. 6. The obligations of the Borrower hereunder are unconditional irrespective of any defense or any rights of setoff, recoupment or counterclaim it might otherwise have against the Lender, the City, or any government body or other person. 7. If any of the terms of this Note, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Note, or the application of such terms to persons or circumstances other than those to which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each of the terms of this Note shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 8. It is intended that this Note is made with reference to and shall be construed as a Minnesota contract and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 9. Each Borrower Entity shall be jointly and severally liable under this Note, and the term "Borrower", wherever used in this Note, shall mean the Borrower or any one or more of them. 10. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all conditions, acts, and things required to exist, happen, and be performed precedent to or in the issuance of this Note do exist, have happened, and have been performed in regular and due form as required by law. [The remainder of this page is intentionally blank.] MN325\52\929078.v2 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Note to be duly executed as of the day of , 2024. BLOCK 52 HOLDINGS LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its BUCHHOLZ EXCHANGE LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Dale Buchholz Its NORGREN EXCHANGE LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Steve Norgren Its [SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROMISSORY NOTE S-1 MN325\52\929078.v2 MORTGAGE THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY THIS MORTGAGE IS $300,000. THIS MORTGAGE (the "Mortgage") made as of the _ day of , 2024 by BLOCK 52 HOLDINGS LLC, BUCHHOLZ EXCHANGE LLC, and NORGREN EXCHANGE LLC, each a Minnesota limited liability company (each, a "Borrower Entity" and, collectively, the "Borrower" or the "Borrower Entities"), in favor of the CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic and a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (the "Lender"). WITNESSETH: All of the Borrower Entities, jointly and severally, owe the Lender the principal sum of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO/100 ($300,000), which debt is evidenced by a Promissory Note of even date herewith (the "Note"), with a maturity date of September 1, 2034, the terms and conditions of which are incorporated herein. This Mortgage secures to the Lender: (a) the repayment of the debt evidenced by the Note, and all renewals, extensions, and modifications of the Note; (b) the payment of all other sums, with interest thereon, advanced to protect the security of this Mortgage; (c) the performance of the Borrower Entities' covenants and agreements under this Mortgage and the Note; and (d) is subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Loan Agreement of even date herewith (the "Loan Agreement"), between the Borrower and the Lender. For this purpose, the Borrower does hereby mortgage, grant and convey to Lender, with power of sale, the real property located in Wright County, Minnesota and legally described in the Exhibit A attached hereto, together with all the improvements now or hereafter erected on the property, and all easements, appurtenances, and fixtures now or hereafter a part of the property. All replacements and additions shall also be covered by this Mortgage. All of the foregoing is referred to in this Mortgage as the "Property". THE BORROWER COVENANTS that the Borrower is lawfully seized of the estate hereby conveyed and has the right to mortgage, grant, and convey the Property and that the Property is unencumbered, except for those encumbrances of record previously disclosed in writing to the Lender, including those in Section 2 hereof. The Borrower warrants and will defend generally the title to the Property against all claims and demands, subject to any encumbrances of record. The Borrower and the Lender agree as follows: 1. PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST; LATE CHARGES. The Borrower Entities shall promptly pay when due the principal of and accrued interest on the debt evidenced by the Note and any late charges due under the Note or the Loan Agreement. 2. SUBORDINATION. This Mortgage is subordinate to (a) the Mortgage given by the Borrower to f 1, dated [ ] and recorded with the [County Recorder] as document number [ ] on and (b) the Mortgage given by the Borrower to [ ], dated [ ] and recorded with the [County Recorder] as document number [ ] on [ ]. 3. CHARGES; LIENS. The Borrower Entities shall pay all taxes, assessments, charges, fines, and impositions attributable to the Property which may attain priority over this Mortgage, and leasehold payments or ground rents, if any. The Borrower Entities shall pay these obligations on time directly to the person owed payment. The Borrower Entities shall promptly discharge any lien which has priority over this Mortgage, notwithstanding those named in Section 2 hereof, unless the Borrower Entities: (a) agree in writing to the payment of the obligation secured by the lien in a manner reasonably acceptable to the Lender; (b) contest in good faith the lien by, or defends against enforcement of the lien in, legal proceedings which in the Lender's opinion operate to prevent the enforcement of the lien; or (c) secure from the holder of the lien an agreement satisfactory to the Lender subordinating the lien to this Mortgage. If the Lender determines that any part of the Property is subject to a lien which may attain priority over this Mortgage, other than those named in Section 2 hereof, the Lender may give the Borrower Entities a notice identifying the lien. The Borrower Entities shall satisfy the lien or take one or more of the actions set forth above within 30 days of the giving of notice. 4. HAZARD OR PROPERTY INSURANCE. The Borrower Entities shall keep the improvements now existing or hereafter erected on the Property insured against loss by fire and any other hazards for which the Lender requires insurance for full replacement value of the improvements. This insurance shall be maintained in the amounts and for the periods that the Lender reasonably requires. The insurance carrier providing the insurance shall be chosen by the Borrower Entities. If the Borrower Entities fail to maintain coverage described above, the Lender may, at the Lender's option, obtain coverage to protect the Lender's rights in the Property in accordance with paragraph 5. All insurance policies and renewals shall be reasonably acceptable to the Lender and shall include a standard mortgage clause. If the Lender requires, the Borrower Entities shall promptly give to the Lender all receipts of paid premiums and renewal notices. In the event of loss, the Borrower Entities shall give prompt notice to the insurance carrier and the Lender. The Lender may make proof of loss if not made promptly by the Borrower Entities. If under Section 16 the Property is acquired by the Lender, the Borrower's right to any insurance policies and proceeds resulting from damage to the Property prior to the acquisition shall pass to the Lender to the extent of the sums secured by this Mortgage immediately prior to the acquisition. 5. PROTECTION OF THE PROPERTY. The Borrower Entities shall keep the property in good repair and shall not destroy or damage the Property or commit waste on or permit impairment or deterioration of the Property. The Borrower Entities shall be in default if any forfeiture action or proceeding, whether civil or criminal, is begun that in the Lender's good faith judgment could result in forfeiture of the Property or otherwise materially impair the lien created by this Mortgage or the Lender's security interest. The Borrower Entities may cure such a default and reinstate, as provided in Section 14, by causing the action or proceeding to be dismissed with a ruling that, in the Lender's good faith 2 MN325\52\929115.v2 determination, precludes forfeiture of the Borrower Entities' interest in the Property or other material impairment of the lien created by this Mortgage or the Lender's security interest. The Borrower Entities shall also be in default if any of the Borrower Entities gave materially false or inaccurate information or statements to the Lender in connection with the loan evidenced by the Note. 6. PROTECTION OF LENDER'S RIGHTS IN THE PROPERTY. If any of the Borrower Entities fail to perform the covenants and agreements contained in this Mortgage, or there is a legal proceeding that may significantly affect the Lender's rights in the Property (such as a proceeding in bankruptcy, condemnation, or forfeiture), the Lender may do and pay for whatever is necessary to protect the value of the Property and the Lender's rights in the Property. The Lender's actions may include paying any sums secured by a lien which has priority over this Mortgage, appearing in court, paying reasonable attorneys' fees, and entering on the Property to make repairs. Although the Lender may act under this Section 6, the Lender is not required to do so. Any amounts disbursed by the Lender under this paragraph 5 shall become additional joint and several debt of the Borrower Entities secured by this Mortgage. Unless the Borrower Entities and the Lender agree to other terms of payment, these amounts shall bear interest from the date of disbursement at a rate equal to the interest rate on the Note and shall be payable, with interest, upon notice from the Lender to the Borrower Entities requesting payment. 7. INSPECTION. The Lender or its agent may make reasonable entries upon and inspections of the Property upon reasonable notice to the Borrower Entities. 8. CONDEMNATION. The proceeds of any award or claim for damages, direct or consequential, in connection with any condemnation or other taking of any part of the Property, or for conveyance in lieu of condemnation, are hereby assigned and shall be paid to the Lender. In the event of a total taking of the Property, the proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Mortgage, whether or not then due, with any excess paid to the Borrower Entities. In the event of a partial taking of the Property in which the fair market value of the Property immediately before the taking is equal to or greater than the amount of the sums secured by this Mortgage immediately before the taking, unless Borrower Entities and Lender otherwise agree in writing, if any, the sums secured by this Mortgage shall be reduced by the amount of the proceeds multiplied by the following fraction: (a) the total amount of the sums secured immediately before the taking, divided by (b) the fair market value of the Property immediately before the taking. Any balance shall be paid to the Borrower Entities. In the event of a partial taking of the Property in which the fair market value of the Property immediately before the taking is less than the amount of the sums secured immediately before the taking, unless the Borrower Entities and the Lender otherwise agree in writing or unless applicable law otherwise provides, the proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Mortgage whether or not the sums are then due. 9. FORBEARANCE BY LENDER NOT A WAIVER. Any forbearance by the Lender in exercising any right or remedy shall not be a waiver of or preclude the exercise of any right or remedy. 10. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS BOUND. The covenants and agreements of this Mortgage shall bind and benefit the successors and assigns of the Lender and the Borrower Entities. 11. LOAN CHARGES. If the loan secured by this Mortgage is or becomes subject to a law which sets maximum loan charges, and that law is finally interpreted so that the interest or other loan charges collected or to be collected in connection with the loan exceed the permitted limits, then: (a) any such loan charge shall be reduced by the amount necessary to reduce the charge to the permitted limit; and (b) any sums already collected from the Borrower Entities which exceeded permitted limits will be refunded 3 MN325\52\929115.v2 to the Borrower Entities. The Lender may choose to make this refund by reducing the principal owed under the Note or by making a direct payment to the Borrower Entities. If a refund reduces principal, the reduction will be treated as a partial prepayment under the Note. 12. NOTICES. Any notice to the Borrower Entities provided for in this Mortgage shall be given by delivering it personally or by mailing it by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. The notice shall be directed to the Borrower Entities at (i) 4510 3rd Street S., Moorhead, Minnesota 56560 and (ii) 4379 33' Avenue S. #121, Fargo, North Dakota 58104, or any other address(es) the Borrower Entities designates by notice to the Lender. Any notice to the Lender shall be given or mailed to 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, or any other address the Lender designates by notice to the Borrower Entities. Any notice provided for in this Mortgage shall be deemed to have been given to the Borrower Entities or the Lender when given as provided in this paragraph. 13. GOVERNING LAW; SEVERABILITY. This Mortgage shall be governed by the law of the state of Minnesota. In the event that any provision or clause of this Mortgage or the Note conflicts with applicable law, such conflict shall not affect other provisions of this Mortgage or the Note which can be given effect without the conflicting provision. To this end, the provisions of this Mortgage and the Note are declared to be severable. 14. BORROWER'S RIGHT TO REINSTATE. If the Borrower meets certain conditions, the Borrower shall have the right to have enforcement of this Mortgage discontinued at any time prior to the earlier of: (a) 5 days before sale of the Property pursuant to any power of sale contained in this Mortgage; or (b) entry of a judgment enforcing this Mortgage. Those conditions are that the Borrower: (a) pays Lender all sums which then would be due under this Mortgage and the Note as if no acceleration had occurred; (b) cures any default of any other covenants or agreements; (c) pays all expenses incurred in enforcing this Mortgage, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees; and (d) takes such action as the Lender may reasonably require to assure that the lien of this Mortgage, Lender's rights in the Property and the Borrower Entities' obligation to pay the sums secured by this Mortgage shall continue unchanged. Upon reinstatement by the Borrower Entities, this Mortgage and the obligations secured hereby shall remain fully effective as if no acceleration had occurred. 15. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES. The Borrower Entities shall not cause or permit the presence, use, disposal, storage, or release of any hazardous substances on or in the Property, except those solvents, oils, cleaning materials, and other substances as are used in the ordinary course of the Borrower Entities' business. The Borrower Entities shall not do, and will use their best efforts not to allow anyone else to do, anything affecting the Property that is in violation of any environmental law. The Borrower Entities shall promptly give Lender written notice of any investigation, claim, demand, lawsuit, or other action by any governmental or regulatory agency or private party involving the Property and any hazardous substance or environmental law of which the any of the Borrower Entities have actual knowledge. If any of the Borrower Entities learn, or are notified by any governmental or regulatory authority, that any removal or other remediation of any hazardous substance affecting the Property is necessary, the Borrower Entities shall promptly take all necessary remedial actions in accordance with that environmental law. As used in this Section 15, "hazardous substances" are those substances defined as toxic or hazardous substances by environmental law and the following substances: gasoline, kerosene, other flammable or toxic petroleum products, volatile solvents, materials containing asbestos or formaldehyde, and radioactive materials. As used in this Section 15, "environmental law" means federal or state laws that relate to environmental protection. 4 MN325\52\929115.v2 16. ACCELERATION, REMEDIES. The Lender shall give notice to the Borrower Entities prior to acceleration following any of the Borrower Entities' breach of any covenant or agreement in this Mortgage. The notice shall specify: (a) the default; (b) the action required to cure the default; (c) a date, not less than 30 days from the date the notice is given to Borrower Entities by which the default must be cured, provided, however, if the Borrower Entities are diligently pursuing a cure, the Borrower Entities shall have such additional time as is reasonably necessary to complete the cure; and (d) that failure to cure the default on or before the date specified in the notice may result in acceleration of the sums secured by this Mortgage and sale of the Property. The notice shall further inform the Borrower Entities of the right to reinstate after acceleration and sale. If the default is not cured on or before the date specified in the notice, the Lender at its option may require immediate payment in full of any sums secured by this Mortgage without further demand and may invoke the power of sale and any other remedies permitted by law. The Lender shall be entitled to collect all expenses incurred in pursuing the remedies provided in this Section 16, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees. If Lender invokes the power of sale, the Lender shall cause a copy of a notice of sale to be served upon any person in possession of the Property. The Lender shall publish a notice of sale, and the Property shall be sold at public auction in the manner prescribed by law. The Lender or its designee may purchase the Property at any sale. The proceeds of the sale shall be applied in the following order: (a) to all expenses of the sale, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees; (b) to all sums secured by this Mortgage; and (c) any excess to the person or persons legally entitled to it. 17. RELEASE OF MORTGAGE. Upon payment of all sums secured by this Mortgage, Lender shall discharge this Mortgage without charge to the Borrower Entities. The Borrower Entities shall pay any recordation costs. 18. TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY OR A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN BORROWER ENTITIES. If any of the Borrower Entities sell or convey all or any part of the Property or any interest in the Property (or if a beneficial interest in any the Borrower Entities is sold or transferred and the Borrower Entity is not a national person) without the Lender's prior written consent, the Lender may, at its option, require immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Mortgage; provided, however, that if the Lender requires the immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Mortgage, then the Borrower Entities may, in their sole discretion, elect to convey title to the Property to the Lender and, in that event, the Lender shall forgive the unpaid balance of all sums secured by this Mortgage and release the Borrower Entities from this Mortgage, the Note, and the Loan Agreement, without further liability. However, the Lender shall not exercise its option if such exercise is prohibited by federal or state law as of the date of this Mortgage. If the Lender exercises such option, the Lender shall give the Borrower Entities notice of acceleration. The notice shall provide a period of not less than 30 days from the date the notice is delivered or mailed within which the Borrower Entities must pay all sums secured by this Mortgage or elect to convey title to the Property to the Lender in lieu of such accelerated payment. If any of the Borrower Entities fail to pay these sums or to elect to convey title to the Lender prior to the expiration of this period, the Lender may invoke any remedies permitted by this Mortgage without further notice or demand on the Borrower Entities. 19. ADDITIONAL COVENANTS. The Borrower Entities covenant: (a) to warrant title to the Property, (b) to pay all other mortgages, liens, charges or encumbrances against the Property as and when they become due, (c) to pay the indebtedness of the Note as herein provided, (d) to pay all real estate taxes on the Property (e) that the Property shall be kept in repair and no waste shall be committed as provided in Paragraph 5, (f) that the Borrower Entities shall keep any buildings on the Property insured against loss by fire and other hazards for at least the sum of the full insurable value of the Property for the protection of the Lender as provided in Paragraph 4; and (g) that the whole of the principal sum shall become due after default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest, or of any tax, or in the performance of any other covenant, 5 MN325\52\929115.v2 at the option of the Lender; provided, however, that if the Lender declares such a default and requires payment in full of all sums secured by this Mortgage, then Borrower Entities may, in their sole discretion, elect to convey title to the Property to the Lender and, in that event, the Lender shall forgive the unpaid balance of all sums secured by this Mortgage and release the Borrower Entities from their obligations under this Mortgage, the Note, and the Loan Agreement, without further liability. 20. JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY. Each Borrower Entity under this Mortgage shall be considered a Mortgagor within the meaning of this Mortgage, and each shall be jointly and severally responsible for payment under this Mortgage and the Note. (The remainder of this page is intentionally blank.) 6 MN325\52\929115.v2 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Borrower has hereunto set its hand the day and year first above written. BLOCK 52 HOLDINGS LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF On this day of , 2024, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared , personally known to me, or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be , the of Block 52 Holdings LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and executed the within instrument on behalf of such corporation. Notary Public S-1 MN325\52\929115.v2 BUCHHOLZ EXCHANGE LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company 53 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Dale Buchholz Its On this day of , 2024, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared , personally known to me, or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be Dale Buchholz, the of Buchholz Exchange LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and executed the within instrument on behalf of such corporation. Notary Public S-2 MN325\52\929115.v2 NORGREN EXCHANGE LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company go STATE OF MINNESOTA 141618lelll &GH Steve Norgren Its On this day of , 2024, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared , personally known to me, or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be Steve Norgren, the of Norgren Exchange LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and executed the within instrument on behalf of such corporation. Notary Public This document drafted by: KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (GAF) 100 S 5th St., Suite 700 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612)337-9300 S-3 MN325\52\929115.v2 1*14111:311W.1 Legal Description of Property That property located in the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, Block 52 First Addition. A-1 MN325\52\929115.v2 Reauested Information below- 1. A map showing the exact boundaries of proposed development. See attached boundary map, plat map of Block 52, and floorplan for the proposed Simplicity Insurance Office 2. Give a general description of the project size and location of building(s); business type or use; traffic information including parking, projected vehicle counts and traffic flow; timing of the project; estimated market value following completion. The proposed business type is Insurance related business, the projected vehicle counts is estimated to be between 80-100 vehicles. The project is estimated to begin January 2024 and be completed by_July, 2024 . The overall cost of the office construction is estimated to be two million dollars . The existing Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use designation and zoning of the property. Include a statement as to how the proposed development will conform to the land use designation and how the property will be zoned. The proposed project is located within the Broadway and Riverfront Sub -Districts in the Central Community District (CCD). More specifically, the project will occur within the Block 52 PUD District which has previously been approved by the City of Monticello for a "Mixed -Use" Building consisting of 87 Residential Apartment Units and approximately 30,000 Sq Ft of Commercial Office and Retail Use. The subject property will be utilized as Insurance based general office use and as such, conforms to the CCD land use designation. The space will account for 13,303 square feet of commercial space or approximately 45 % of the overall commercial space. 4. A statement identifying how the increment assistance will be used and why it is necessary to undertake the project. The Increment assistance will be used as a critical source of "gap funding" for the project. In the early stages of negotiating with Simplicity Insurance they were admittedly evaluating several locations both inside and outside the Monticello market. In addition to evaluating locations based on a variety of criteria. However, an emphasis was placed on being able to work with a Developer capable of delivering a "turnkey" Class A office space, while limiting their out-of-pocket expenses in exchange for a long-term commitment. As the Developer we have committed $1,166,400.00 dollars towards the construction of Simplicity's new office space (For reference we have included a copy of the proposed floor plan, which will occupy the entire "Broadway Wing" of the Block 52 Building). Our intentions are to utilize the low interest increment financing from the EDA as "gap funding" along with a combination of cash and conventional financing to fund the completion of this project. For further perspective, the total amount of tenant improvements being requested by Simplicity equates to the equivalent of just under 4 of the 10 years of base rent being paid by Simplicity. Even with the proposed funding request from the EDA this creates a substantial financial challenge, however as we have stated from the outset, we have always viewed the Block 52 project as a long-term investment and securing a quality business such as Simplicity will provide a firm foundation to the commercial portion of the development. The addition of Simplicity will serve as incubator for future commercial uses and the 80-100 employees will inevitable be customers of other future retailers/businesses/restaurant that locate within Block 52 as well as for other businesses that are located within the downtown Monticello corridor. It has always been our belief that the ongoing success of Block 52 will be contingent upon our ability to attract both office and retail as both uses provide substantial synergy to between them. The addition of a high -quality business such as Simplicity Insurance to the Block 52 development will undoubtedly contribute to the overall vibrancy and sustainability that the City of Monticello has been seeking for the downtown corridor. 5. A statement identifying the public benefits of the proposal including estimated increase in property valuation, new jobs to created, hourly wages and other community assets. As mentioned above creating/maintaining an additional 80-100 jobs that will pay in the range of 540,0004100,000 will be a boost to the downtown business corridor and the addition of these employees will undoubtedly be serve as customers of the existing and future businesses and retailers located within the downtown corridor. Once open Simplicity Insurance will be one of the largest employers within the Monticello downtown business district. 6. A written description of the developer's business, principals, history, and past projects Buchholz Properties has been active in the Monticello Market since acquiring the 20-acre development in 2019 from Premier Bank known as Deephaven, which is a part of the greater Pointes at Cedar master development. Other notable projects within the Deephaven Development are the 165-market rate multifamily residential units, Healing Moments Counseling Center, and most recently the West Metro Medical Office Building. Other projects within the Monticello market include the Block 52 Mixed Use Development and the 6" Street Station. Outside of the Monticello market Buchholz has been involved in the development and acquisition of a variety of real estate projects throughout the tri-state area (Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota). Buchholz prides itself on principles of hard work, honesty, and a willingness to seek out and incorporate input from communities that they develop within. I understand the application fee will be used for EDA staff and consultant costs and may be partially refundable if the request for assistance is withdrawn. Refunds will be made at the discretion of the EDA Board and be based on the costs incurred by the EDA prior to withdraw of the requests for assistance. If the initial application fee is insufficient, I will be responsible for additional deposits. I further understand that by signing below, should the original escrow be exceeded, the applicant or responsible party will be billed for additional services. In signing the acknowledgement below, the applicant is indication that the have not relied on the estimate of fees in their decision to proceed with the application. If payment is not received as required by this agreement, the City will process to recover payment by action of assessment or a lien against the property. Payment of the cost sill be required whether the application is granted or denied. SIGNATURE Applicants signature: Date: January 3, 2024 Proiect Information: 1. Have you ever filed for bankruptcy? NO 2. Have you ever defaulted on any loan commitment? NO 3. Have you ever applied for conventional financing for the project? There is currently a first mortgage on the overall Block 52 proiect in the amount of $17,100,000.00. We are in the process of increasing this amount by approximately $ 2,000,000.00 due to proiect delays and increased input costs. The increased mortgage is being sought in order to complete the remainder of the construction on the overall building and is unrelated to construction involving Simplicity Insurance 4. List Financial References: a. Marc Knutson (Western State Bank) mobile (701)-306-1490 email Marc.Knutson(@bankforward.com b. Jordan Cook (Boarder Bank) mobile (701)-526-1130 email Jordan.cook(@boarder.bank C. Adam Braunberger (American Federal Bank) mobile (701)-340-9361 email abraunberaerPamericanfenderal.net 5. Have you ever used Business Assistance Financing before? NO If yes, what, where and when? non -applicable PROJECT INFORMATION: 1. Location of Proposed Project: 101 Broadway W, Monticello, MN, 55362 2. Amount of Business Assistance Requested 5300,000.00, 3% Interest. 10-vear term 3. Need for Business Assistance requested? Gap Funding 4. Present ownership of site: BLOCK 52 HOLDINGS LLC, a Minnesota limited liabilitv companv., BUCHHOLZ EXCHANGE LLC, a Minnesota limited liabilitv companv. and NORGREN EXCHANGE LLC. a Minnesota limited liabilitv companv 5. Number of permanent jobs created as a result of project? 80-100 6. Estimated annual sales: Present N/A Future: N/A 7. Market Value of Project following completion 8. Anticipated start date: January 2024 Completion Date July 1. 2024 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: 1. Estimated project related costs: a. Land acquisition N/A b. Site Development N/A c. Building Cost N/A d. Equipment N/A e. Architectural/Engineering Fee $40,000.00 f. Legal fees $4,000.00 g. Off -site development Costs $180,000.00 2. Sources of financing: a. Private financing institution 51,350,000.00 b. Tax Increment funds no additional request c. Other public funds $300,000.00 d. Developer Equity 350,000.00 BLOCK 52 SITE PLAN Q CID CID �, to see✓ E err ;V Ilk �RSTRF v? i t WALGREENNS PLAZA 19 � m I o I o Lzaavrmasu La�oMx{m�< •uAaww,rm�m{��„�mn�mv:M�n.0 Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balances Economic Development Authority & Small Cities Development Program December 31, 2023 - Unaudited ASSETS Cash and investments Receivables Unremitted taxes Delinquent taxes Accounts Intrafund receivable Prepaid items Notes receivable Land held for resale TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable Intrafund payable Unearned revenue Escrow deposits Total liabilities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - property taxes FUND BALANCES Nonspendable Restricted Assigned Economic Development Fagade Grant Total fund balance TOTAL LIABILITIES, AND FUND BALANCES Required or Actual Decertification Date TIF District Type (d) = decertified CITY OF MONTICELLO TIF 6 (d) TIF 19 (d) TIF 20 (d) TIF 22 (d) TIF 24 TIF 29 TIF 30 TIF 34 (d) TIF 40 TIF 41 TIF 42 TIF 43 TIF 45 TIF 46 GAAP Total Total EDA General GMEF TIF Future Raindance MS Shores Prairie West Downtown St. Henry's Front Porch CMHP Interchange Briggs UMC Headwaters Headwaters Block 52 WiHa Reconciliation EDA SCDP $ 2,114,264 $ 1,056,105 $ $ 49,450 $ 37,719 $ 104,142 $ 519,286 $ 55,800 $ 34,654 $ 80,227 $ 77,340 $ 13,478 $ 31,671 $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,174,136 $ 828,753 753 - - - - - - - - - - - 753 - 1,722 - - - - - 2,687 - - - - - - - - - 4,409 - 10,218 - - 10,218 111,607 - - 728,845 - - - - - - - - - - - - (840,452) - - 5,033 - 5,033 - 127,246 191,541 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 318,787 110,748 2,883,058 - - - - 163,200 3,046,258 - $ 5,253,901 $ 1,247,64E $ - $ 778,295 $ 37,719 $ 104,142 $ 685,173 $ 55,800 $ 34,654 $ 80,22 7 $ 78 1,671 $ $ - $ - $ - $ (840,452) $ 7,559,594 $ 939,501 $ 16,639 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ 127,246 $ - $ - $ - $ 143,885 $ - - 45,363 - 4,644 728,845 400 400 400 400 (840,452) - - - - - - - 163,200 - - - - - - - - (163,200) - - 5,492 - - - - - - - 5,492 22,131 - 45,363 - - - 163,200 A ,644 - - 728,845 400 127,646 400 400 (1,003,652) 149,377 - 1,722 - 2,687 4,409 5,033 - - IL - - - - - - - - - - 5,033 - - 1,247,646 - 778,295 37,719 104,142 519,286 55,800 34,654 15,583 77,340 13,478 (697,174) (400) (127,646) (400) (400) 163,200 2,221,123 939,501 5,025,015 - (45,363) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4,979,652 - 200,000 - - - - - - - - - 200,000 - 5,230,048 1,247,646 (45,363) 778,295 37,719 104,142 519,286 55,800 34,654 15,583 77,340 13,478 (697,174) (400) (127,646) (400) (400) 163,200 7,405,808 939,501 $ 5,253,901 $ 1,247,64E $ $ 778,295 $ 37,719 $ 104,142 $ 685,173 $ 55,800 $ 34,654 $ 80,227 $ 77,340 $ 13,478 $ 31,671 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (840,452) $ 7,559,594 $ 939,501 121912013 12131 /2023 1211012018 12/31 /2023 12131 /2026 12131 /2029 12131 /2029 12131 /2022 12131 /2045 12/31 /2031 12/31 /2050 12131 /2050 12/31 /2050 12131 /2032 Redevelopment Housing Redevelopment Housing & Housing Housing Housing Redevelopment Housing Economic Housing Housing Redevelopment Economic Redevelopment Development Development Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Economic Development Authority & Small Cities Development Program For the Period Ended December 31, 2023 - Unaudited Revenues Property taxes Tax increments Intergovernmental Investment earnings Interest on loans Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures: Current Salary and wages Benefits Supplies Professional services - legal Professional services - other LPV Insurance Legal and general publications Marketing Dues and membership Utilities IT services Travel and conferences Other expenditures Excess increments Interest on intrafund loans PAYG payments to third parties Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing uses Transfers in Net change in fund balances Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of yeas Required or Actual Decertification Date TIF District Type (d) = decertified EDA General $ 401,807 $ 284,123 206,458 1,963 3,300 897,651 138,697 48,091 35 21,780 156,883 3,395 398 5,000 6,796 789 3,473 5,120 295,753 686,210 GMEF 3,481 3,481 211,441 3,481 TIF 6 (d) TIF Future Raindance 3,950 - 215,391 3,481 5,014,657 1,244,165 (45, $ 5,230,048 $ 1,247,646 $ (45, 29,294 29,294 Redevelopment CITY OF MONTICELLO TIF 19 (d) TIF 20 (d) TIF 22 (d) TIF 24 TIF 29 TIF 30 TIF 34 (d) TIF 40 TIF 41 TIF 42 TIF 43 TIF 45 TIF 46 GAAP Total Total MS Shores Prairie West Downtown St. Henry's Front Porch CMHP Interchange Briggs UMC Headwaters Headwaters Block 52 WiHa Reconciliation EDA SCDP $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ 401,807 $ 37,749 269,641 55,830 34,684 17,576 70,020 65,098 550,598 - - - - - - - 284,123 - 206,458 37,948 (31,257) 3,481 3,344 - - - - 3,300 - 37,749 - 269,641 55,830 34,684 17,576 70,020 65,098 - - - (31,257) 1,449,767 41,292 - - - - 138,697 - - 48,091 - 35 - - 1,000 - - - - - - - - - 22,780 - - - 1,468 400 400 400 400 159,951 - - - - - - - - - 3,395 30 30 30 30 0 30 30 30 224 862 - - - - 5,000 6,796 789 3,473 5,120 295,753 0,20 180,209 1,963 - 29,294 (31,257) - 63,018 - 63,018 3 1 9 30 1,993 30 63,048 30,986 400 400 400 400 (31,257) 933,969 - ,719 (30) 88,4 55,800 34,654 15,583 (30) 6,972 34,112 (400) (400) (400) (400) 515,798 41,292 - - - - - - 3,950 - 9 (30) 88,402 55,800 34,654 15,583 (30) 6,972 34,112 (400) (400) (400) (400) 519,748 41,292 104,172 430,884 - - - 77,370 6,506 (731,286) - (127,246) - - 163,200 6,886,060 898,209 7,719 $ 104,142 $ 519,286 $ 55,800 $ 34,654 $ 15,583 $ 77,340 $ 13,478 $ (697,174) $ (400) $ (127,646) $ (400) $ (400) $ 163,200 $ 7,405,808 $ 939,501 1213112023 1211012018 1213112023 12/31/2026 12/31/2029 12/31/2029 12/31/2022 12/31/2045 1213112030 12/31/2050 12/31/2050 12/31/2050 1213112032 Housing Redevelopment Housing & Housing Housing Housing Redevelopment Housing Economic Housing Housing Redevelopment Economic Redevelopment Development Development MINNESOTA STATUTES 2023 116J.993 1161993 DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1. Scope. For the purposes of sections 116J.993 to 116J.995, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Benefit date. "Benefit date" means the date that the recipient receives the business subsidy. If the business subsidy involves the purchase, lease, or donation of physical equipment, then the benefit date begins when the recipient puts the equipment into service. If the business subsidy is for improvements to property, then the benefit date refers to the earliest date of either: (1) when the improvements are finished for the entire project; or (2) when a business occupies the property. If a business occupies the property and the subsidy grantor expects that other businesses will also occupy the same property, the grantor may assign a separate benefit date for each business when it first occupies the property. Subd. 3. Business subsidy. "Business subsidy" or "subsidy" means a state or local government agency grant, contribution of personal property, real property, infrastructure, the principal amount of a loan at rates below those commercially available to the recipient, any reduction or deferral of any tax or any fee, any guarantee of any payment under any loan, lease, or other obligation, or any preferential use of government facilities given to a business. The following forms of financial assistance are not a business subsidy: (1) a business subsidy of less than $150,000; (2) assistance that is generally available to all businesses or to a general class of similar businesses, such as a line of business, size, location, or similar general criteria; (3) public improvements to buildings or lands owned by the state or local government that serve a public purpose and do not principally benefit a single business or defined group of businesses at the time the improvements are made; (4) redevelopment property polluted by contaminants as defined in section 116J.552, subdivision 3; (5) assistance provided for the sole purpose of renovating old or decaying building stock or bringing it up to code and assistance provided for designated historic preservation districts, provided that the assistance is equal to or less than 50 percent of the total cost; (6) assistance to provide job readiness and training services if the sole purpose of the assistance is to provide those services; (7) assistance for housing; (8) assistance for pollution control or abatement, including assistance for a tax increment financing hazardous substance subdistrict as defined under section 469.174, subdivision 23; (9) assistance for energy conservation; (10) tax reductions resulting from conformity with federal tax law; (11) workers' compensation and unemployment insurance; (12) benefits derived from regulation; Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 116J.993 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2023 (13) indirect benefits derived from assistance to educational institutions; 2 (14) funds from bonds allocated under chapter 474A, bonds issued to refund outstanding bonds, and bonds issued for the benefit of an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1999; (15) assistance for a collaboration between a Minnesota higher education institution and a business; (16) assistance for a tax increment financing soils condition district as defined under section 469.174, subdivision 19; (17) redevelopment when the recipient's investment in the purchase of the site and in site preparation is 70 percent or more of the assessor's current year's estimated market value; (18) general changes in tax increment financing law and other general tax law changes of a principally technical nature; (19) federal assistance until the assistance has been repaid to, and reinvested by, the state or local government agency; (20) funds from dock and wharf bonds issued by a seaway port authority; (21) business loans and loan guarantees of $150,000 or less; (22) federal loan funds provided through the United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration; and (23) property tax abatements granted under section 469.1813 to property that is subject to valuation under Minnesota Rules, chapter 8100. Subd. 4. Grantor. "Grantor" means any state or local government agency with the authority to grant a business subsidy. Subd. 5. Local government agency. "Local government agency" includes a statutory or home rule charter city, housing and redevelopment authority, town, county, port authority, economic development authority, community development agency, nonprofit entity created by a local government agency, or any other entity created by or authorized by a local government with authority to provide business subsidies. Subd. 6. Recipient. "Recipient" means any for -profit or nonprofit business entity that receives a business subsidy. Only nonprofit entities with at least 100 full-time equivalent positions and with a ratio of highest to lowest paid employee, that exceeds ten to one, determined on the basis of full-time equivalent positions, are included in this definition. Subd. 6a. Residence. "Residence" means the place where an individual has established a permanent home from which the individual has no present intention of moving. Subd. 7. State government agency. "State government agency" means any state agency that has the authority to award business subsidies. History: 1999 c 243 art 12 s 1; 2000 c 482 s 1; 2004 c 206 s 52; I Sp2005 c 3 art 7 s 1; 2006 c 259 art 4s1; 2008 c 366 art 5 s 2 Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes MINNESOTA STATUTES 2023 116J.994 1161994 REGULATING LOCAL AND STATE BUSINESS SUBSIDIES. Subdivision 1. Public purpose. A business subsidy must meet a public purpose which may include, but may not be limited to, increasing the tax base. Job retention may only be used as a public purpose in cases where job loss is specific and demonstrable. Subd. 2. Developing a set of criteria. A business subsidy may not be granted until the grantor has adopted criteria after a public hearing for awarding business subsidies that comply with this section. The criteria may not be adopted on a case -by -case basis. The criteria must set specific minimum requirements that recipients must meet in order to be eligible to receive business subsidies. The criteria must include a specific wage floor for the wages to be paid for the jobs created. The wage floor may be stated as a specific dollar amount or may be stated as a formula that will generate a specific dollar amount. A grantor may deviate from its criteria by documenting in writing the reason for the deviation and attaching a copy of the document to its next annual report to the department. The commissioner of employment and economic development may assist local government agencies in developing criteria. A copy of the criteria must be submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development along with the first annual report following May 15, 2000, or with the first annual report after it has adopted criteria, whichever is earlier. Notwithstanding section 116J.993, subdivision 3, clauses (1) and (21), for the purpose of this subdivision, "business subsidies" as defined under section 116J.993 includes the following forms of financial assistance: (1) a business subsidy of $25,000 or more; and (2) business loans and guarantees of $75,000 or more. Subd. 3. Subsidy agreement. (a) A recipient must enter into a subsidy agreement with the grantor of the subsidy that includes: (1) a description of the subsidy, including the amount and type of subsidy, and type of district if the subsidy is tax increment financing; (2) a statement of the public purposes for the subsidy; (3) measurable, specific, and tangible goals for the subsidy; (4) a description of the financial obligation of the recipient if the goals are not met; (5) a statement of why the subsidy is needed; (6) a commitment to continue operations in the jurisdiction where the subsidy is used for at least five years after the benefit date; (7) the name and address of the parent corporation of the recipient, if any; and (8) a list of all financial assistance by all grantors for the project. (b) Business subsidies in the form of grants must be structured as forgivable loans and are subject to the financial review under section 16B.981. For other types of business subsidies, the agreement must state the fair market value of the subsidy to the recipient, including the value of conveying property at less than a fair market price, or other in -kind benefits to the recipient. (c) If a business subsidy benefits more than one recipient, the grantor must assign a proportion of the business subsidy to each recipient that signs a subsidy agreement. The proportion assessed to each recipient must reflect a reasonable estimate of the recipient's share of the total benefits of the project. Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 116J.994 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2023 2 (d) The state or local government agency and the recipient must both sign the subsidy agreement and, if the grantor is a local government agency, the agreement must be approved by the local elected governing body, except for the St. Paul Port Authority and a seaway port authority. (e) Notwithstanding the provision in paragraph (a), clause (6), a recipient may be authorized to move from the jurisdiction where the subsidy is used within the five-year period after the benefit date if, after a public hearing, the grantor approves the recipient's request to move. For the purpose of this paragraph, if the grantor is a state government agency other than the Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation, "jurisdiction" means a city or township. [See Note.] Subd. 4. Wage and job goals. The subsidy agreement, in addition to any other goals, must include: (1) goals for the number of jobs created, which may include separate goals for the number of part-time or full-time jobs, or, in cases where job loss is specific and demonstrable, goals for the number of jobs retained; (2) wage goals for any jobs created or retained; and (3) wage goals for any jobs to be enhanced through increased wages. After a public hearing, if the creation or retention of jobs is determined not to be a goal, the wage and job goals may be set at zero. The goals for the number of jobs to be created or retained must result in job creation or retention by the recipient within the granting jurisdiction overall. In addition to other specific goal time frames, the wage and job goals must contain specific goals to be attained within two years of the benefit date. Subd. 5. Public notice and hearing. (a) Before granting a business subsidy that exceeds $500,000 for a state government grantor and $150,000 for a local government grantor, the grantor must provide public notice and a hearing on the subsidy. A public hearing and notice under this subdivision is not required if a hearing and notice on the subsidy is otherwise required by law. (b) Public notice of a proposed business subsidy under this subdivision by a state government grantor, other than the commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation, must be published in the State Register. Public notice of a proposed business subsidy under this subdivision by a local government grantor or the commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation must be published in a local newspaper of general circulation. The public notice must identify the location at which information about the business subsidy, including a summary of the terms of the subsidy, is available. Published notice should be sufficiently conspicuous in size and placement to distinguish the notice from the surrounding text. The grantor must make the information available in printed paper copies and, if possible, on the Internet. The government agency must provide at least a ten-day notice for the public hearing. (c) The public notice must include the date, time, and place of the hearing. (d) The public hearing by a state government grantor other than the commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation must be held in St. Paul. (e) If more than one nonstate grantor provides a business subsidy to the same recipient, the nonstate grantors may designate one nonstate grantor to hold a single public hearing regarding the business subsidies provided by all nonstate grantors. For the purposes of this paragraph, "nonstate grantor" includes the commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation. (f) The public notice of any public meeting about a business subsidy agreement, including those required by this subdivision and by subdivision 4, must include notice that a person with residence in or the owner of taxable property in the granting jurisdiction may file a written complaint with the grantor if the grantor Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 3 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2023 116J.994 fails to comply with sections 1161993 to 116J.995, and that no action may be filed against the grantor for the failure to comply unless a written complaint is filed. Subd. 6. Failure to meet goals. (a) The subsidy agreement must specify the recipient's obligation if the recipient does not fulfill the agreement. At a minimum, the agreement must require a recipient failing to meet subsidy agreement goals to pay back the assistance plus interest to the grantor or, at the grantor's option, to the account created under section 116J.551 provided that repayment may be prorated to reflect partial fulfillment of goals. The interest rate must be set at no less than the implicit price deflator for government consumption expenditures and gross investment for state and local governments prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the United States Department of Commerce for the 12-month period ending March 31 of the previous year. The grantor, after a public hearing, may extend for up to one year the period for meeting the wage and job goals under subdivision 4 provided in a subsidy agreement. A grantor may extend the period for meeting other goals under subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (3), by documenting in writing the reason for the extension and attaching a copy of the document to its next annual report to the department. (b) A recipient that fails to meet the terms of a subsidy agreement may not receive a business subsidy from any grantor for a period of five years from the date of failure or until a recipient satisfies its repayment obligation under this subdivision, whichever occurs first. (c) Before a grantor signs a business subsidy agreement, the grantor must check with the compilation and summary report required by this section to determine if the recipient is eligible to receive a business subsidy. Subd. 7. Reports by recipients to grantors. (a) A business subsidy grantor must monitor the progress by the recipient in achieving agreement goals. (b) A recipient must provide information regarding goals and results for two years after the benefit date or until the goals are met, whichever is later. If the goals are not met, the recipient must continue to provide information on the subsidy until the subsidy is repaid. The information must be filed on forms developed by the commissioner in cooperation with representatives of local government. Copies of the completed forms must be sent to the local government agency that provided the subsidy or to the commissioner if the grantor is a state agency. If the commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation is the grantor, the copies must be sent to the commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation. The report must include: (1) the type, public purpose, and amount of subsidies and type of district, if the subsidy is tax increment financing; (2) the hourly wage of each job created with separate bands of wages; (3) the sum of the hourly wages and cost of health insurance provided by the employer with separate bands of wages; (4) the date the job and wage goals will be reached; (5) a statement of goals identified in the subsidy agreement and an update on achievement of those goals; (6) the location of the recipient prior to receiving the business subsidy; (7) the number of employees who ceased to be employed by the recipient when the recipient relocated to become eligible for the business subsidy; (8) why the recipient did not complete the project outlined in the subsidy agreement at their previous location, if the recipient was previously located at another site in Minnesota; Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 116J.994 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2023 4 (9) the name and address of the parent corporation of the recipient, if any; (10) a list of all financial assistance by all grantors for the project; and (11) other information the commissioner may request. A report must be filed no later than March 1 of each year for the previous year. The local agency and the commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation must forward copies of the reports received by recipients to the commissioner by April 1. (c) Financial assistance that is excluded from the definition of "business subsidy" by section 116J.993, subdivision 3, clauses (4), (5), (8), and (16), is subject to the reporting requirements of this subdivision, except that the report of the recipient must include instead: (1) the type, public purpose, and amount of the financial assistance, and type of district if the assistance is tax increment financing; (2) progress towards meeting goals stated in the assistance agreement and the public purpose of the assistance; (3) if the agreement includes job creation, the hourly wage of each job created with separate bands of wages; (4) if the agreement includes job creation, the sum of the hourly wages and cost of health insurance provided by the employer with separate bands of wages; (5) the location of the recipient prior to receiving the assistance; and (6) other information the grantor requests. (d) If the recipient does not submit its report, the local government agency must mail the recipient a warning within one week of the required filing date. If, after 14 days of the postmarked date of the warning, the recipient fails to provide a report, the recipient must pay to the grantor a penalty of $100 for each subsequent day until the report is filed. The maximum penalty shall not exceed $1,000. Subd. 8. Reports by grantors. (a) Local government agencies of a local government with a population of more than 2,500 and state government agencies, regardless of whether or not they have awarded any business subsidies, must file a report by April 1 of each year with the commissioner. Local government agencies of a local government with a population of 2,500 or less are exempt from filing this report if they have not awarded a business subsidy in the past five years. The report must include a list of recipients that did not complete the recipient report required under subdivision 7 and a list of recipients that have not met their job and wage goals within two years and the steps being taken to bring them into compliance or to recoup the subsidy. If the commissioner has not received the report by April 1 from an entity required to report, the commissioner shall issue a warning to the government agency. If the commissioner has still not received the report by June 1 of that same year from an entity required to report, then that government agency may not award any business subsidies until the report has been filed. (b) The report required under paragraph (a) is also required for financial assistance of $25,000 and greater that is excluded from the definition of "business subsidy" by section 116J.993, subdivision 3, clause (1), and of $75,000 and greater that is excluded from the definition of "business subsidy" by section 116J.993, subdivision 3, clause (21). The report for the financial assistance under this paragraph must be completed Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 5 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2023 116J.994 within one year of the granting of the financial assistance. The report required for financial assistance under this paragraph must include: (1) the name of the recipient, its organizational structure, its address and contact information, and its industry sector; (2) a description of the amount and use of the financial assistance and the total project budget, including a list of all financial assistance by all grantors for the project and the private sources of financial assistance; (3) the public purpose of the financial assistance, the job goals associated with both the financial assistance and the total project in which the financial assistance is included, the hourly wage of each job created, and the cost of health insurance provided by the employer; (4) the date the project will be completed; (5) the name and address of the parent corporation of the recipient, if any; and (6) any other information the commissioner may request. (c) Within one year of completing a report under paragraph (b), the local government agency must report to the commissioner on progress in achieving the purposes and goals under paragraph (b), clause (3). (d) The commissioner of employment and economic development must provide information on reporting requirements to state and local government agencies. Subd. 9. Compilation and summary report. The Department of Employment and Economic Development must publish a compilation and summary of the results of the reports for the previous two calendar years by December 1 of 2004 and every other year thereafter. The reports of the government agencies to the department and the compilation and summary report of the department must be made available to the public. The commissioner must make copies of all business subsidy reports submitted by local and state granting agencies available on the department's website by October 1 of the year in which they were submitted. The commissioner must coordinate the production of reports so that useful comparisons across time periods and across grantors can be made. The commissioner may add other information to the report as the commissioner deems necessary to evaluate business subsidies. Among the information in the summary and compilation report, the commissioner must include: (1) total amount of subsidies awarded in each development region of the state; (2) distribution of business subsidy amounts by size of the business subsidy; (3) distribution of business subsidy amounts by time category; (4) distribution of subsidies by type and by public purpose; (5) percent of all business subsidies that reached their goals; (6) percent of business subsidies that did not reach their goals by two years from the benefit date; (7) total dollar amount of business subsidies that did not meet their goals after two years from the benefit date; (8) percent of subsidies that did not meet their goals and that did not receive repayment; Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 116J.994 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2023 6 (9) list of recipients that have failed to meet the terms of a subsidy agreement in the past five years and have not satisfied their repayment obligations; (10) number of part-time and full-time jobs within separate bands of wages for the entire state and for each development region of the state; (11) benefits paid within separate bands of wages for the entire state and for each development region of the state; and (12) number of employees in the entire state and in each development region of the state who ceased to be employed because their employers relocated to become eligible for a business subsidy. Subd. 10. Compilation. The Department of Employment and Economic Development must publish a compilation of granting agencies' criteria policies adopted in the previous two calendar years by December 1 of 2004 and every other year thereafter. Subd. 11. Enforcement. (a) A person with residence in or an owner of taxable property located in the jurisdiction of the grantor may bring an action for equitable relief arising out of the failure of the grantor to comply with sections 116J.993 to 116J.995. The court may award a prevailing party in an action under this subdivision costs and reasonable attorney fees. (b) Prior to bringing an action, the party must file a written complaint with the grantor stating the alleged violation and proposing a remedy. The grantor has up to 30 days to reply to the complaint in writing and may take action to comply with sections 116J.993 to 116J.995. (c) The written complaint under this subdivision for failure to comply with subdivisions 1 to 5, must be filed with the grantor within 180 days after approval of the subsidy agreement under subdivision 3, paragraph (d). An action under this subdivision must be commenced within 30 days following receipt of the grantor's reply, or within 180 days after approval of the subsidy agreement under subdivision 3, paragraph (d), whichever is later. History: 1999 c 243 art 12 s 2; 2000 c 482 s 2-11; 2001 c 7 s 28; 2003 c 128 art 13 s 24-26; 1 Sp2003 c 4 s 1; 2004 c 206 s 24, 25; 1 Sp2005 c I art 4 s 23, 24; 1 Sp2005 c 3 art 7 s 2-5; 2008 c 366 art 5 s 3-5; 2017 c 94 art 7 s 11-13; 2023 c 62 art 7 s 13 NOTE: The amendment to subdivision 3 by Laws 2023, chapter 62, article 7, section 13, is effective January 15, 2024. Laws 2023, chapter 62, article 7, section 13, the effective date. Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2H. Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for accessory structures exceeding 1.200 Square Feet in the R-A, Residential Amenities District Applicant: Dave Kasper Prepared by: Meeting Date: Community & Economic Development 2/26/2024 Coordinator Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City Administrator Assistance City Engineer, Chief Building Official ACTION REQUESTED ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure space exceeding 1,200 square feet on a parcel in an R-A, Residential Amenities District, based on the findings in Resolution PC-2024-03 subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Address: 6478 82nd Street NE, Monticello, MN 55362 Legal Description: Lot 9, Block 2, Carlisle Village 41" Addition PID #: 155-183-002090 Planning Case Number: 2024-04 Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure area exceeding 1,200 square feet in the R-A, Residential Amenities District. Deadline for Decision: March 10, 2024 (60-day deadline) May 9, 2024 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: Low -Density Residential Zoning Designation: R-A, Residential Amenities District Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: N/A Current Site Uses: Vacant Single -Family Residential Lot Surrounding Land Uses: North: Single -Family Residential City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 East: Township Single -Family Residential & Agriculture South: Single -Family Residential West: Single -Family Residential Project Description: Construct a single-family home with an attached garage of 1,459 square feet. The zoning ordinance permits a total of 1,200 square feet of all combined attached and detached accessory structure area, with an additional 300 square feet allowed by Conditional Use Permit. An approved Conditional Use Permit provides for a maximum overall size of 1,500 square feet on residential properties. ANALYSIS Zoning. The subject parcel is zoned R-A, Residential Amenities district, within the subdivision of Carlisle Village 41" Addition. One of two vacant lots remaining for construction within the 41n Addition, this portion of Carlisle Village was originally approved by way of Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development in 2005. As a PUD, the design standards, as specified within the PUD, apply. Where not specified by the PUD, the underlying zoning district standards apply. The zoning standards established by the CUP did not include any square footage specifics regarding attached or detached accessory structures. Rather, the standards established by the plat's CUP focus mainly on the exterior design elements of the homes in Carlisle Village 41n Addition. The Community Development Department reviewed the PUD and base zoning district standards for the proposed new construction home and those standards will be further applied by the Department of Building & Safety at time of building permit. The R-A district standards in the zoning ordinance include specific language for attached garages, requiring a minimum 700 square foot attached garage for homes. The proposed attached garage in this case more than doubles this requirement. The other standard addressed requires that no portion of any garage space may be more than five feet closer to the street than the front building line of the principal use (including porch). The covered front porch shown on the plans extends beyond the garage's roof soffit by roughly 3 feet, and therefore complies with this standard in the R-A district. Setbacks. The following table lays out the setback requirements for the R-A District and shows the proposed accessory structure and principal building proposed on this site to be compliant with these standards. Required Proposed Compliant Front Yard 35 feet, and no portion of >_ 38 feet, the porch that extends Yes the garage may be 5 feet out beyond the principal City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 closer than the principal building and attached garage building (including porch) structure is still >_ 35 feet from the front property line. Side Yard (north) 10 feet >_ 17 feet Yes Side Yard (south) 10 feet >_ 13 feet Yes Rear Yard 30 feet >_ 34 feet, the principal structure Yes and proposed deck shown in the rear yard do not encroach within the setback. Curb Cut and Access. At the time of construction of the proposed home, a curb cut will be made at the cul-de-sac of 82nd Street NE, to provide public street access to the lot. The R-A district sets a maximum driveway width of 30 feet at the property line, and 28 feet at the curb. The survey provided by the applicant shows driveway width of 27.5 feet at the property line, with a width of 24 feet at the curb. The proposed design meets these requirements of the R-A district. Accessory Structure — Major Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Specific to the proposed garage itself, the zoning ordinance lays out the following criteria related to accessory structures in residential districts, including guidelines for when a conditional use permit is required related to the overall size of the structure. 153.092(D)(2) Accessory building — major. (a) In all residential districts except M-H, the following shall apply: 1. Size. a. Except by conditional use permit issued pursuant to § 153.092(D)(3)(a)1.b. below, no detached accessory building shall exceed 10% of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: (i) 1,200 square feet; or (ii) The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. Staff Comment: The proposed garage is 1,459 square feet. Being that it is an attached garage, the limitation of 10% of the total rear yard square footage is not applicable to this request. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint (livable space) includes livable space on the first floor, as well as any portion of livable space that is above the proposed garage area. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 The finished square footage on the main floor of the home is 1,359 sq. ft., and the total living space above the garage is roughly 241 square feet, for a total of 1,600 square feet. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint remains larger than the proposed attached garage area. b. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in § 153.092(D)(3)(a)1.a. above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a conditional use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: (i) Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. Staff Comment: The applicant did not address the intended use for the proposed garage space. Limiting the use of the space to residential personal property purposes only is included as a conditional of approval in Exhibit Z. (ii) The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. Staff Comment: The total size of the lot is .39 acres and given the proposed setbacks of the accessory structure and home, the lot is of sufficient size and width to accommodate both. (iii) The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. Staff Comment: The proposed garage is 1,459 square feet. Staff believes that this is not an unreasonable size given the lot area and overall width. (iv) The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. Staff Comment: The attached garage is proposed to have the same materials as the principal structure, that would be built at the same time as the garage. Overall Conditional Use Permit Criteria. (a) Conditional use permit criteria. Approval of a conditional use permit application requires the city find that conditions can be established to ensure that all the following criteria will always be met: 1. The conditional use will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Staff Comment: The conditional use is expected to increase property values for the applicant parcel and would not impact those of the neighboring property. 2. The conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working near the use. Staff Comment: The accessory structure will be constructed according to building code and not endanger persons or property in the area. 3. The conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property for permitted uses predominant in the area. Staff Comment: The surrounding area is fully developed. No access or development will be impacted by the proposed building, including the large single-family township lot to the east. 4. The conditional use will not pose an undue burden on public utilities or roads, and adequate sanitary facilities are provided. Staff Comment: The project is not expected to pose a burden on public utilities and roads. 5. The conditional use can provide adequate parking and loading spaces, and all storage on the site can be done in conformance with city code requirements. Staff Comment: The proposed conditional use will provide adequate parking and loading space relevant to the principal use of the property. 6. The conditional use will not result in any nuisance including but not limited to odor, noise, or sight pollution. Staff Comment: The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to result in any nuisances. 7. The conditional use will not unnecessarily impact natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, and shorelines; and all erosion will be properly controlled. Staff Comment: The conditional use is not anticipated to unnecessarily impact any natural features on or surrounding the parcel. The applicant provided a tree survey for the subject parcel that was created at the time of the development's original approval, and removal of any trees as depicted on the plan will be followed accordingly. 8. The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined in §§ 153.090 through 153.093 for the proposed use. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Staff Comment: The provisions identified in this CUP requirement are addressed in the section above. Budget Impact: The applicant has submitted the required fees and escrows associated with the review and public notice for the applications. The escrow will be used to cover the review costs of consulting staff. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff involved with the review of the application members of the Development Services and Engineering Departments, III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Monticello 2040 plan recognizes the need for reinvestment in properties throughout the community, including residential properties, citing a strategy to "Sustain a diverse array of neighborhood character and housing types throughout Monticello." PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and held a public hearing on the item during its regular meeting on February 6, 2024. Staff provided an overview of the proposed request. During their discussion, the Commission inquired whether the footprint size of the principal structure is relevant to the proposed garage size for the conditional use permit. Staff clarified that the conditional use permit allows the city to consider a garage footprint size larger than the footprint of the primary principal structure, as long as the total size of the garage is under 1500 square feet. However, the square footage footprint of the principal structure in this case is still in excess of the proposed garage square footage. No public was present to address the Commission. Following discussion, the Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit unanimously. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure area exceeding 1,200 square feet in the R-A, Residential Amenities District. As discussed within this report, the lot provides sufficient space to accommodate the larger garage and will not negatively impact the surrounding properties. Additionally, the applicant indicated that the architecture of the garage will match that of the principal building. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2024-03 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 D. Certificate of Survey, dated January 2, 2024 E. Proposed Building Elevation & Floor Plans F. Tree Survey, dated April 18, 2005 G. Engineering Comment Letter, dated January 29, 2024 Z. Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 square feet Address: 6478 82"d Street NE, Monticello, MN 55362 Legal: Lot 9, Block 2, Carlisle Village 4t" Addition PID: 155-183-002090 1. The attached accessory structure will be used for personal residential storage and parking only; no commercial activity may occur in the building. 2. Compliance with the comments of the City Engineer's letter dated January 29, 2024. (Added condition) 3. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-03 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES EXCEEDING 1,200 SQUARE FEET IN AN R-A, RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES DISTRICT LOT 9, BLOCK 2, CARLISLE VILLAGE 4T" ADDITION PID 155-183-002090 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct an attached garage structure in the side yard portion of the subject property for storage of private residential storage and recreational use; and WHEREAS, the proposed total accessory building space would exceed the standard area of 1,200 square feet; and WHEREAS, accessory building space, when exceeding 1,200 square feet, requires a Conditional Use Permit, and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Single -Family Residence (R-A) and, which allows such use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Low Density Residential" for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting the proposed structure and location of the structure on the subject property, along with access via driveway; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 6, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed structure will be in compliance with maximum square footage requirements, which require accessory structures to total no more than 1,500 square feet. 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed structure is architecturally similar to the principal structure in roofline and facade appearance, subject to appropriate conditions of approval. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-03 3. The parcel is a lot which will accommodate the attached garage without crowding the subject property or neighboring parcels. 4. The building will be constructed so as to be consistent with the use and building massing of other single-family structures common in the community and in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITRESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for an expanded garage, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: 1. The attached garage structure will be used for personal residential storage and parking only; no commercial activity may occur in the building. 2. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 61" day of February, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION 1 B Y drew Tapper, Vi -Chair ATTEST: Angela Schujn�no,\�ommunity Development Director 2 Consideration of CUP for Accessory Structure Address: 6478 82nd Street NE -Legal: Lot 9, Block 2, Carlisle Village 4th Addition-PID: 155-183-002090 Created by: City of Monticello To whom it may concern, We are looking to build a new construction house at 6478 82 d St. Monticello. This will be my family's primary residence. The city ordinance allows up to 1200sq'of accessory structures (Garage) either attached nrdetached aolong asthe footprint ofthe house isequal orlarger. |fyou are above 1ZODsq'but at or below 1500sq' you are required to go through the conditional use process application and check list attached. Hayden can answer any questions you may have about that process. There isalso zoning language addressing garage doors not exceeding 4O%ofthe front facade ofthe building. This will be addressed simultaneously during the conditional use process. Our proposed garage size is 1,459 sq.ft. and the foundation of the house is 1,395 sq.ft. with a total finished square footage of 2,605 sq. ft. and a total house size of 4,000 sq. ft. We would like to get approval tobuild our house asper plans attached. Thank you for your time, Dave and Jessica Kasper /f / / / / / / / lil CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY LOT 9, BLOCK 2 CARLISLE VILLAGE 4T8 ADDITION WRIv&a COUNTY, MINNESOTA I ` � I E�cIs��NG I \ 10 \'1004 N86'39'46"E 120.43 ' /Q°0 g ' k \ i co 44,511cn -' 700` —7004� 5.yq----+--j—J 931 25 /12 ' E O ^ 001.71 / 03 0 �¢®� Oa ° i \90� r ,995 /"' lu 0 .0 /i L Oj d Gj R1 \� �� / 3. 9 / I kT FENCE I ZING WALL .68% BFE = 995.33' / 99�100 ,' G 001.8(y \A FFE = 1005-111 '/1 / / � � � 1 BEARINGS ARE BASED ON NAD83(2011) WRIGHT COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM • IRON MONUMENT FOUND IRON MONUMENT SET WITH CAP NO. (57070) 0 STORM MANHOLE (MH STR) ® STORM INLET SQUARE (CB SQ) © UTILITY PEDESTAL sQ SANITARY MANHOLE (MH SAN) FIRE HYDRANT (FH) 10 11 95.33 1 ' / Northwestern Surveying and Engineering, Inc. prepared this survey without the benefit of current title work. The property shown is based on a legal description provided by you the client or a general request at the appropriate County Recorder's office. Easements, site restrictions or adjoining deed conflicts may exist which affect subject property and are not shown by this survey. We reserve the right to revise the survey upon receipt of a current title commitment or title opinion. SCOTT McFARLIN ATE 6478 82ND ST NE SURVEYING GINEERING, INC. MONTICELLO, MN P.O. Box 3067 - Bemidji Minnesota - 56619 J08#• 23785 DRAWN BY. KJK I HEREBY CER77FY THAT TV/S SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY FILENAME. 23785_KJK ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED $F_V# DESCRIPTION DATE LAND SURVEYOR UNDER 7HE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. i FIRST DRAFT tq/ 20 2 GRADING PLAN REV S1/01/202234 KALEB J. KADELBACH (LIC. NO. 57070) DATE.• , MM tirrr r rr �rrr rig wwrr�r �wr rare � rrr w -CONSTRUCTION PERMIT OFFICES- WAIVER ONLY TO ACCEPT THIS PLAN IF THE WORD )r ORIGINAL SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED w PROPERTY ADDRESS: 64-f882no15tORIGINAL O_� W (YZdwum() Monticello, 1"IN 55362 s� � � HOME FOR: Dave JessicaKaspghoIT IS ,AESO UNLAWFUL FOR THIS PRINT TO BE Q �C w Q w W THIS PLAN IS DRAWN FOR: �' REPRODUCED. UNLESS THE WORD `� U 0, z z d_ O� �0,� ff ''ORIGINAL" SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED � Dw f � u � w � � CLIMATE ZONE #rob �`% S Fez S 12 p 42" FROST FOOTINGS �°/ �°/OL 9 9 ° z-4 d 0 `� w z PERMISSION ONLY TO BE GRANTED B`I' � � W w d R / / Distinctive Draftin and Desi n, LLG, d 35* SNOW LOADS Qw�wuviW��z (WRIGHT COUNTY) � I I I I I I I 1 I I $ w-1 i N U 3 N U 12 Z w UIzuj�pz Ca U O w (y Q O 12 \ \ C 4ffwoO 12 I --ID U z�OU �W w13Z� p� FLASHING NOTE: ALL OPENINGS TO EXTERIOR MUST BE CAULKED 4 FLASHED FLASHING IS REQUIRED WHERE ALL ROOF 4 VERTICAL SURFACES MEET, OR WHERE SIDING MATERIAL CHANGES 2'-0" OVERHANG -4 EAVES 11-O" OVERHANG a GABLE ENDS (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) ARCHITECTURAL ASPH SHINGLES ALUMINUM SOFFIT 4 FASCIA CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT (HOUSE AND GARAGE) LP BOARD 4 BATTEN SIDING PER ELEVATION (FRONT ELEVATION ONLY) LP LAP SIDING PER ELEVATION (FRONT ELEVATION ONLY) VINYL LAP SIDING (SIDES 4 REAR ELEVATIONS) 3i2" CORNER TRIM 3i211 WINDOW 4 DOOR TRIM (FRONT ELEVATION) f STONE PER ELEVATION (VERIFY BRAND 4 COLOR) s� S O� 0 ��I I EDAR BRACKETSEll W fL (X U z U fQ W I I I I I I I 1i1 I II I I I I I I LFJ L-1 L—I L—I L—I L—I Lu I I L_I L—I L—I L—I ul Lu 12 / 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I w Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I — /� / I I I I I I I I 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1� I I � I I IU- � O� H `n� w I II I"I I I I� I— oN�z . 12 I12 ALL M,41N FLOOR ROOF HEEL HEIGHTS ARE w �� ICI IIIIII IIIIII 111111111111111111111 1111111111 11 I wwr�� 1111 5 \ 6 ~ q H lu ma < z O H z n B,4S�D ON �:12 R001= P1TC�-I � z d w U > z ( X 5�' BAND BOARD V ,I U ZO d LU w>_ W � z N ALL 2ND FLOOR ROOF HEEL HEIGHTS ARE II I III BASED ON ro:12 ROOF PITCH j L111 /m /m I � 0 0- (L J L �t_;z 211 lu u ,( i — �� ' O ,; �I O — `--1 - . . . . . . . I IOn� v ` ii _� �I II - - - - - - - X( ` l ts c4 u GARAGE DOOR STYLE PER / DUE TO VARIOUS SITE CONDITIONS �� 0 � CUSTOMER/BUILDER I OF INDIVIDUAL LOTS, THE GRADE LINES 0 11�U_ -� REPRESENTED BY THIS PRINT ARE FOR ? r, Off/ Off/ ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY, THEY DO NOT O� e,z �' �ez �' REFLECT ACTUAL FINISHED GRADE, v �l �ez L SEE SURVEY FOR DETAILS ON ACTUAL GRADE m w �� O O O"7 Z > ('_I_�FIRONT ELEu,4�. - 7 Al SC�4LE: 1/4" = 1'-O" � $ � FINISHED SQ, FT, - 2605 6� S' FUTURE FINISHED SQ, FT. -'�P6 6� S' 0� 0� UNFINISHED SQ. FT, - 32-1 0� GARAGE SQ, FT, - 1459 �(E 12 (NOTE: SQ. FT, IS MEASURED FROM EXT, OF SHEATHING) �6 11:16 AM V. m Se tember 29 2023 L 12 12 V� u I ro 12 El El /4 _ _ TOP O BFLOORINCa 4 3' 6" ® [E-3 [Ell 01 �� 1011 m TOP OF SU�^LOORINC� - 01 ----------------- -------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------------------------ r , EXTEND SIDING OVER FOUNDATION INSULATION a PROPOSED (TYPICAL ON HOUSE) \) RETAINING WALL / 22 LTLEV,4TI01�1 A Al SCALE: 1/0" = 1'-OI' 0. .10 0/2 ALL ITEMS WITH A DOUBLE BOX BORDER HAVE BEEN ENGINEERED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, S� SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS 0 PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY 1 LICENSED PROF'ESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SIGNED: PRINTED: ROBBIE HY4AND DATE: LICENSE. NO.: 49580 rn 6� D,. Q Q m � m s SIMPSON LSTA26 r Z 0 STRAPS (TYP.) Dl 12 TOP OF SUBFLOORING TOP OF SUBFLOORING 12 3---------------------------------- 4 Q ,ni Q N II� F�� x q u u m - - - _- - TOP OF SUBFLOORING� TOP OF SUBFLOORING ;ol o r ------------------------------ ------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------- ATTIC VENTILATION: Ia NET FREE AREA TO BE EQUAL SIMPSON TO 1/50TH OF THE ATTIC AREA STRAPS (TYP.) OR 1/300TH OF ATTIC AREA O PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST 50% EXTEND SIDING OVER IN THE UPPER PORTION OF ROOF 12 WITH THE BALANCE IN VENTED SOFFIT FOUNDATION INSULATION 12 12 (TYPICAL ON HOUSE) 'Alt` 12 'Alt` '�� N ' N ABU66. )T BASERIGT ELE,ATIO46IMP50N OITYP� 12 Al SCALE: 1/8" = 11_0 II 12 12 12 4 c4 a Q Q d) N AP50 A36 Vy Is�_ x Q (K 61 w O C W (L 11I (�/ u� to N Q STRAPS LUy /O U d Q AS SHO/W�N) N)Ff I]] - 4 ";� /� 114 RAIL e MIN 36" HEIGHT EEil` .Q CODE REQUIREMENT'S) �� TOP OF SUBFLOOfRINCajI Z IK o ,. ,. O O w = // // / / I Lu W PROPOSED RETAINING WALL \ (VERIFY W/ FINAL SURVEY) 1 � � � I SQ, FT, E FLOOR AREAS ARE FOR / 3 1REAR ELEVATION CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY. W Cq Al SCALE: 1/S'I = 11-0'I SQ, FT, f AREAS ARE NOT TO BE cv USED FOR MARKETING PURPOSES © 2023 Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLG ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET NO UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION Al DF WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT I I I I BRACED WALL LINE SPACING BRACED WALL LINE SPACING BRACED WALL LINE SPACING rL � ALL ITEMS WITH A DOUBLE BOX BORDER H a N m N ° HAVE BEEN ENGINEERED / ° 3 �� /� 3 a w � 68'-O" m m j u CERTIFY1 HEREBY THIS LAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS - --�-6" / ,� v PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT 0 0 12'-6" SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY / 19'-O" O/ 16'-O" / LICENSED PROF'ESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER I" C u z C THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 5 I�2 / Q // J SIGNED: -5 ° J� 8'-O" 8'-O" ='T J� PRINTED: ROBBIE HYLAND �"' 5'-3"t � 3'-9"± 4'-O" DATE: LICENSE. NO.: 4958❑ /�f\ 2 4'-9%�" 2�. ° 2 " 3'-6�" 23i." WINDOW NOTES: o o TV /�SINGLE PLY ALL WINDOWS d PATIO DOORS SPECIFIED REATED RIM ON THIS PRINT ARE: MARVIN ESSENTIAL VERIFY ALL WINDOW R.O.'S PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION G� o o ) 2 PLY Ilr" LVL I O 6� WINDOWS TO MEET FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS m 6� 0. O w w , O R'O, 6'-O" x 6'-S" V nl CI) ♦t m _j 1 cn `r O i ESSPD6o68 _ z ° WINDOW SUPPLIER TO VERIFY EGRESS d TEMPERED GLASS BWL I ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ EXT. OF SHEATHING 4 W,O, WALL FND. -i--.------------------------------. F."-- N _ ♦ ♦ BWL I WSP � � � � � _ - - - r - - - � . - � /� � _ ` - ` - ` - � /� `. � � � ' ` WSP � I 3 PLY 2X10 TREATED RIMIIIGENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: o z BWL 2 � - ` `cs-wsP o z0 N Q m o z n O LL W i O � N m m 2X10 TRT, JSTS, `1 SOLID SHADED AREAS REP, 16" O,G, w a SOLID BEARING DOWN TO GONG, _x J =x w m -a> , Q CENTER OF (ALL TRIMMERS TO BE BLOCKED TO FND,) � 4" CONC, SLAB i= 0 ♦Q OPENING ` ^ \ _ INTERIOR BEARING WALLS LL N O w 'Tu i CONCRETE FLOOR W/ IN -FLOOR HEAT ; �6n 12'-3�" U HAVE BLOCKING �' MIDPOINT 2" FOAM INSULATION BELOW SLAB I K Q EXT. OF SHEATHING < W.O. WALL FND. ` (TOP OF FOAM TO BE FLUSH W/ QI ' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — `, = a ` CONCRETE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL i TOP OF LEDGE/FTG.) w, alz a� w REBAR IN FOUNDATION WALLS E °w FUTURE W'4 z FOOTINGS AS NEEDED PER CODE z 1 w - �'ij -I < O O ltl CONCRETE CONTRACTOR TO POUR W u FAMILY ROOM �� Q,Q Q w m a Q FUTURE FINISHED m ol3 I p �� 3 5,000 PSI FOOTINGS OR EQUIVALENT i. �� .� �'-Ilh° CLG. HT, w Q m 5 w CARPET FLR. �;° r ' w� O O W AND ALL OTHER CONC. TO CODE _2X10 TRT, JSTS� w U o ,18" FLOOR TRUSSES ° 16" z- TOP OF WINDOW R.O. TO BE SET N I I -A Q1 AT fo'-11 i4 ABOVE CONCRETE FLOOR PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 0 24" O,G. (VERIFY W/ FINAL SURVEY) _ (2 PLY 2X10'S W/ o = z;° _ i' O ALL WINDOW AND DOOR HEADERS TO BE 2'.l3ia 12'-34' "� 2 PLY 2X10'6 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2 TRIMMERS -9 EA SIDE) w o 1• �' O I — O p N R'O, 6'-0" x 5'-0" = J ' 8'-6 8'-6 x w BEAMS 4 HEADERS ARE SIZED _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ESDH3050-2W J , , O = o @ 2 ALL --------- ----- ------ ------------ EXT, OF SHEATHING d W.O, WALL FND./ICF WALL "E° - - - - - - - 7 - - - -' ' , � - N N _ _ _ 5 _ _ _ BY Distinctive Drafting B Design i� Yam, 1: - - - - - - - - - I �- -6 II - - „- - _ `Q - } w O% 3/ n m\a CENTER OF sWWSP �� (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) I = OPTIONAL LINEN , ' „ ii , _� N 14 4 r 6 -5 4 w _ HOLD 2X6 ' Q�_ ' 5%"XS%a° PSL_ _ �� CLOSET _ _ _ 2i-_I'T/8 ��/8 II'-6" v , p O = F �I ' w a1 �, OPENING \� ` I- r------------ -- - --- --- --- --------- - - R' O °rJ WALL BACK , - _ , (VERIFY REACTION — ' i HEADER SPAN ''- - - - atp R.O, 6•-0" X 5•-0" Y m HEETROGK ON UNDERSIDE OF FLOO 13ia" a REAR I - - I Al FINAL TRUSS -' " `� ' " - ' w ESD14305.a 2W - - - - - - - - - _ ,a LL C14" � � - ' 1 _ I1'-0" SR,O - TI . _ + _ _�_ _ - TRUSSES TO MEET FIRE PROTECTION OF R WALL FOR DRAWINGS) I — — _ _ — — 2 PLY FTC, UNDER OPENING) — — - - \ WALL FND./ICF WALL E , , , SPACE UNDER STAIRS) G ACCESSIBLE z I _ a _ I u — — — it I' ICF WALL "E" Z ID J 2'-6 II '� _ _ EXT, OF BREATHING a W.O. FLOORS CODE (INCLUDING z ' _ ' r " n , 2 PLY 9'h"2,OE MIGROLLAM ' J�\ HOLD 2X6 W/ 2 TRIMMERS o EA. SIDE _ _ O Q I - o` I \ I , Q - - - -----------------------------� ° WALL BACK z I - O _ DROPPED BEAM „ m p i i FUTURE s I - R ` I U 3ra REAR/ J U f" a _ N ' S.D./C�.D. -,4"x54" PSL I o IZ Z WALL FOR / ADD ADDITIONAL STAIR STRINGER I w , N \ N Q (VERIFY REACTION W/ FINAL TRUSS) J p ICF WALL "E" SUPPORT AS NEEDED, VERIFY ON SITE Q BEDROOM � _� C) i i DRAWINGS) I FUTURE , - 4 - , O IL D - ' FUTURE FINISHED IY U I 2'-6" , j O ®- EXHAUST FAN VENTED TO EXTERIOR C W �'-ll�' CLG. HT. ~ Q S.D. - - - - I _ BEDROOM ' ° ' Q W s � 0. I a - I CARPET FLR. (K = i_ FUTURE I 13 p ,- NJ FUTURE FINISHED ' - - 'Z Q ' �� ALL FOOTING SIZES ASSUME 'o, i i m \ ) l'-Ilh" CLG. HT, ' - - ' 0 ' » REG, ROOM �' ' -, _ �� C4 2000 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (MIN.) •�I,ol`- I,I� z \ O CARPET FLR- ' "4_ Iw w �i FUTURE FINISHED — -' I /^ 3.-0 11 6'-311 1111 Jt 3'" I - i m\`� �i L at l'-III" CLG. HT, �-' ,/� N i I'u 0. � - - - - - - ro, CARPET FLR. ROOF/FLOOR TRUSS 8 GIRDER TRUSS C _ 13-43i4" ♦9 5'-Ilia" ® m Il'-2i" �� w 11'-I1 E - LOCATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, VINYL PLANK' 11'-lOi2" 5'-33/4" 3'-5i2" a '� S'-6" T' i I O REFER TO FINAL TRUSS LAYOUTS II \ II II II I D ` I l // a : ' I FOR ACTUAL LOCATIONS 6'-3"XS" M,O, 6'-3"XS" M,O- _ ° P 8� -, -' 5'-�3q� o o --- II / II II / II "f W s.D.,co.D, s \ If 4'JOII rr -' " ALL FLOOR TRUSSES 8 BEAMS TO HAVE 4' l'-34 A MAX, LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION OF L/480 a1117 I-,q- =UTURE LUF,od MAX, TOTAL LOAD DEFLECTION OF L/240 STEP FDN, ALL FOOTING TUB B SHOWERPER GRADE CONDITIONS , WET BARO ,A5 `r-- _ _ ---____------------------------' N ` ALL BEAMS e HEADERS ON THIS PLAN �r -��' `�_ 'C _� I N Q N I "U--I--I1'-10"_ I�Il------------,aj ::. �I ARE WEYERHAEUSER ENGINEERED o--damooLL,,l�m„''- -' o i W '� c0 p /�►!� Xv' ill UNFlN A E ' S, IF DIFFERENT STORAG WOOD PRODUCT - BRAND IS USE ------------- -------------------- - - a I I�' F I l D D, VERIFY SIZE B DEPT -- NI II = � I I - JI LEDGE�� tea, I J PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 3 31'-OII O v -', 5'-h2" a' a ' I i III �I °Ill I I II I - - I ,••� V `l Q_ I �" � I I l -3,` � cvl a I I l I 4 -1 ' 6 " C BEAM/HEADER SUPPLIER TO VERIFY �Q \J I -D - I 1 X o a - = o Q „ 16 RS �� o m _ " _ = THAT ALL BEAMS, POSTS, AND HE Q = ry m 11 WILL SUPPORT ROOF, AND FLOOR LOAD61 Kl / -� �ry X W I I ' UFz. I I I I I N ' ' '45 O o a _ m PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ` = ° I II V Q J i' i ST.aIRS I I I 1'n � Q I I RADON 4 m\v 6 -9� LL I� ,,, ° • ROOF CONSTRUCTION 8 ATTACHMENTS o s a {I. _ _ �- _ r _ _ T _ _ ;,, _ _ _ -/ - - - - - i PIPE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE TO MN RESIDENTIAL CODE (SEE SECTIONS a I----- 3 "- UNEXGAVATED - I R301 s RSO1 FOR ADDITIONAL INFO) a ` 4 CONC. SLAB O b - - - - - I`- - - - - . - - curl BSK ° ROOF TRUSSES INSTALLED PER MANUF, SPECS/DRAWINGS 8 MN RESIDENTIAL Z ~ -+ a - �R PLY 2X1O'' O w w o CODE SECTION RSo2,10 ° Q FURNACE4- �+J ` 6'-v /4 10 -Si4 3 2 CONCRETE FLOOR W/ IN -FLOOR HEAT - ° �' � ROOF UPLIFT CONNECTION TO BE IN 4 2" FOAM INSULATION BELOW SLAB I Il'-6" f ' �r P � _ ° `-'�' ACCORDANCE TO MANUFACTURERS r ® Op .4 a oEI O Q N RECOMMENDATIONS dPER MINNESOTA O 0 _Z = w FD ® �° RESIDENTIAL CODE i i LL H N '-----..<------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q o - -+ a --' p N p (SEE CODE RSO2,11FOR MORE INFO) ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: p E o v MECH, ROOM O - _ O N ALL MECH,LOCATIONSARE _ I PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM TO CONNECT TO SUMP BASKET LL ~ @ a W/ 3" GASTIGHT PVC PIPE AND VENT UP THROUGH ROOF — D - - - - - - FOR REFERENCE ONLY, i —, - i (TERMINATE 12" ABOVE ROOF SURFACE) t0 VE IFY LOCATIONS ON SITE 4 to o p � I I- ° SIMPSON LSTA26 STRAPS (TYP,) AND SIMP50N ABU66 POST BASE (TYP,) O (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR VISUAL) I - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' -, ° - i C— O o �' o' � ` BRACED WALL LINE NOTES: ALL BRACED WALL PANELS TO BEGIN 1A WITHIN 10'-0" FROM EACH END OF A - -----------------I- -- X 8" M.O. .- ---------_-- ®o a , 4_ / BRACED WALL LINE Qo a v I � ' � wV, _ � i V H� lA ♦O I 4 LLIa I --------------------------------- o/--------------------- 1----X-P- M.O.- -- O ca _ DISTANCE BETWEEN ADJACENT EDGES - ----------------------------------- ------------------- -; 1 r p O N - OF A BRACED WALL PANEL �� - - - ° - -` - ■ - SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 20'-0" o p .` . � --- - - --------------------------- -. _ .` ` 2PLYTREATED2X10 FLUSH BEAM `♦', BRACED WALL LINES CALCULATIONS m� ASSUME SEISMIC DESIGN O O O CATEGORY A, 115 MPH ULTIMATE DESIGN 13e 13e v "� "� v e WIND SPEED, a EXPOSURE CATEGORY B "� �r � .. �� BRACED WALL LINES CALCULATIONS 3 PLY TREATED 2XI0 ASSUME BLOCKING BEHIND ALL O FLUSH BEAM O �% V V HORIZONTAL SHEATHING JOINTS W'-2" REFER TO SECTION R602,10 FOR MORE INFO 2'-4" ° o ° 0 3 �LOuu LEVEL FLOOR PLAN w = u w = u J/�� II I II I II I II / I II II A2 SCdLE- 1/4 4 -O 13'-O IT-O" j FUTURE FINISHED SQ, FT, - 1060 LEDGE Il'-6" UNFINISHED SQ. FT. - 32-1 (MECH, ROOM 4 UNDER STAIR STORAGE) HOUSE FOUNDATION DIMENSION TOTAL LOUDER LEVEL SQ. FT, - 13135 NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONING IS TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE FOUNDATION (NOTE: SQ. FT, 15 MEASURED (UNLESS NOTED OTHERW 16E) FROM EXT, OF SHEATHING) -CONSTRUCTION PERMIT OFFICES- WAIVER 6 ONLY TO ACCEPT THIS PLAN IF THE WORD V, ORIGINAL SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED W c4 Q lY omz�wOu�z ORIGINAL o Q WZI— Wooer IT IS ,AESO UNLAWFUL FOR THIS PRINT TO BE z .4 u u In �- REPRODUCED. UNLESS THE WORD w u 7" IY z z-1 2 n Ww fKOd- ORIGINAL SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED Y D f O O Q_w z z PERMISSION ONLY TO BE GRANTED BY i Ll U w d O O Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLG, d 0 w w _� � ofW�uzlp/4 qwn wuj OZ Qw�W WLU Oz zwffwA 3:`)U�z� ALL ICF WALLS ARE BASED �s W U z Q O ON Fox Blocks SPECS: `1 W } Q (X - 16 HIGH •J Q �/ (�/ W N - FOAM WIDTH OF 2-5/8" W N - CORE SIZE PER FND. NOTES ` OU u_ Ca Z z Z tu Op J71 *•IF DIFFERENT BRAND IS USED, w m O T U Q oU q LL f — 1 — 0 VERIFY SIZE 3 DEPTH PRIOR TO CONST, W .4Z (� U ZW yz(Lzw0!L00 FOUNDATION NOTES: W Q N z (Y fk I w(L(KU�U��fQW ®I CRSE 13%4" TAPER TOP ICF (S" CORE) W/ INTERIOR LEDGE CUT OUT Q 8" HEIGHT 2 CRSE IV/4" ICF (8" CORE) 4-0" HEIGHT TOTAL) ON 20" X S" CONC, FTG © I CRSE 13%4" TAPER TOP ICF (8" CORE) W/ INTERIOR LEDGE CUT OUT w 8" HEIGHT I CRSE 113/4" BRICK LEDGE ICF (8" CORE) -INSERT BRICK LEDGE BLOCK EVERY OTHER TO SUPPORT GONG. GARAGE FLR, I CRSE 4" HEIGHT EXTENSION 4 CRSE 134" ICF (8" CORE) (5'-4" HEIGHT TOTAL) ON 20" X 8" CONC, FTG I CRSE 13%4" TAPER TOP ICF (8" CORE) O I CRSE 4" HEIGHT EXTENSION 5 CRSE 13i4" ICF (8" CORE) (8'-4" HEIGHT TOTAL) ON 20" X 8" GONG, FTG O2X4 STUDS -0 16" O,C, (3) 2X4 ,60 TREATED ON 16"XS" GONG. FTG O2X6 STUDS Q 16" O.G, (3) 2x6 ,60 TRT, PLATES ON 16"XS" CONC, FTG OJ 2X6 STUDS -0 16" O.C, 1 CRSE 134" TAPER TOP ICF (8" CORE) W/ INTERIOR LEDGE CUT OUT m 4" HEIGHT 2 CRSE 13i4" ICF (8" CORE) (4'-0" HEIGHT TOTAL) ON 20" X 8" CONC, FTG ©40"X40"X12" GONG. FTG W/ (4) 05 BARS EA, WAY ®36"X36"X12" CONC, FTG W/ (4) "4 BARS EA, WAY ®30"X30"X12" GONG, FTG W/ (4) 04 BARS EA, WAY O(3) 2x(o POST ON 22"X22"X12" CONC. FTG ••VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR POST FOOTINGS SIZES BELOW WITH FINAL TRUSS LAYOUT 6X6 TREATED POST W/ 12" DIAM GONG. FTG. BELLED TO 16" X S" DEEP (MIN,) AT BASE MIN, 42" BELOW GRADE t) 6X6 TREATED POST W/ 12" DIAM CONC. FTG. BELLED TO 23" X 12" DEEP (MIN,) AT BASE MIN, 42" BELOW GRADE O6X6 TREATED POST W/ 12" DIAM GONG, FTG, BELLED TO 28" X 12" DEEP (MIN,) AT BASE MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE OSXS TREATED POST W/ 14" DIAM GONG, FTG, BELLED TO IS" X 10" DEEP (MIN,) AT BASE MIN, 42" BELOW GRADE ©SXS TREATED POST W/ 14" DIAM GONG. FTG. BELLED TO 22" X 12" DEEP (MIN,) AT BASE MIN, 42" BELOW GRADE L- - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I w � z U 1_L H O = � Ilk ff (LQ z d w wLu QzO�z� (L U lu z (X cry U U W LL CL U� O�� u— Z LPL o Q T0� W Ooz tL(L U U (L Q E 0 � u 61 bp(�n Q Q K s • •• (� ' m m Q� 4Nu N c? N m x O GENERAL DECK GONST. NOTES: ALL POST FOOTING SIZES ASSUME S 2000 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (MIN,) ATTACH DECK LEDGER WITH LAG BOLTS THAT PENETRATE INTO RIM JOIST OR > U- O WALL STUDS PER MN CODE REQUIREMENTS ff O w (V t ) cYl USE MANUFACTURERS REQUIRED FASTENERS LLUU N N N UJ (V m UJ ALL FASTENERS IN CONTACT W/ TREATED Lu o- Ul UJ u�i Q LUMBER TO BE IN ACCORDANCE TO cp I— N MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS N Q N Q) 6► (SEE MN RESIDENTIAL CODE •q SECTION R3113,1 FOR MORE INFO) Lo 3 O z u- (k c0 0 DECK CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN d zLu ACCORDANCE TO MN EXTERIOR 0- I j O O DECK CODE (SEE MN RESIDENTIAL CS) } CODE SECTION R501 FOR MORE INFO) = cD Q- �S� v X OW 1 • N SQ. FT. E FLOOR AREAS ARE FOR r— CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY. SQ. FT, f AREAS ARE NOT TO BE N USED FOR MARKETING PURPOSES (L © 2023 Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLG ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET NO UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION A OF (o WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT 20'-0" % 12'-0" 16'-�" I I -CONSTRUCTION PERMIT OFFICES- WAIVER PG - -41 BRACED WALL LINE SPACING BRACED WALL LINE SPACING ul BRACED WALL LINE SPACING qi BRACED WALL LINE SPACING ALL ITEMS WITH A DOUBLE BOX BORDER 3 3 6 { „ 3 6 q N 6 ONLI' TO ACCEPT THIS PLAN IF THE WORD m �r � 68-0 m Art my"ORIGINAL" SNOWS IN THE COLOR RED 4 � HAVE BEEN ENGINEERED \ 19'-�" �II / i I II II I II I, i / Y W 1 -O 1110 If -II ' 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, `,_ l� f / / rQ W u- SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS �► 10'-3i4" /� 8'-83/411 3 0 _ ai U (X d �. c4 mz�wo.4 z ORIGINAL UNDER MY DIRECT •.u- ` PREPARED BY ME ❑R (� SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY O �� Jal � O O O - c() W LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER S� 4'-4iz" / 3'-1'/z" g'2" ` , II u = Z W ~ (L THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESODE - ` 4 4% ,,, F -o -� l5',� IT IS ALSO UNLAWFUL FOR THIS PRINT TO SE � 4 4 u Q w w z - - - - - - - - - NUMBER OF RISERS /�, REPRODUCED. UNLESS THE WORD `� U 0 z .4 �� Ww r MAY VARY II W WLu (XOd— SIGNED' . �'7 �'7 _/ � o 1 I - - - - - - - - DEPENDING ON ��/ ORIGINAL SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED (K O 0 OL W Z PRINTED: ROBBIE HYLAND �/ I �� i �� (SEE SECTION 2/A5 FOR - - - - - - - - O 7 FINISHED GRADE �/ �/1 r �c PERMISSION ONL`I' TO SE GRANTED B1' � � 0 � W � d a Q DATE: ;^, LICENSE. Nfl.: 4958❑ //O ? WINDOW R.O. HEIGHTS a I W z `O O d Z (X N N W // / Distinctive Draf t i nay and Des l Fyn LLC, 0 HEADER SIZES) W WO /O f� — �J �J � •Q W z w r--------- K` J\ o - > - RESDHP2ro20 -3" J 4'-9" 4'-0" / - /�, '� �1„ '� 4 W W IUIJ W O Z ' R.O. 2'-(o" x 11 RAILING TO CODEI , } (K � a Z O FRAME TALL WALL W1 2X(o+,-� ESDH2ro(o0 �� ` Z w = N U 3 N U Q STUDS 9 16" O.C. `I W z 6� (SEE SECTION 2/A5 FOR I R.O, 4'-O" x 3'-/0" s�0 6� m O w Q Q O O ESDHP403/o ro _ L > Z N Q ADDITIONAL FRAMING �� O O INFORMATION) �. R.O, 4'-0x 6'-O 7 /� z /� i - BWL I 1 `1 �� ESDHP4O6O RAILING TO CODE J I WL I U- O u Q 0 GINEEREDI1 a \` `�/ _ I I C� �b CODE I z » 'C `\ a• I GINEERED O w Z O Z Q RAILIN TEMP, TEMP, I Itl"IY, o O 71 W- O BALLOON F� 4ME WALL TO w p m � U UNDERSIDE Ol: SCISSOR TRUSS DECK o W Zlo Q (X Z _x , ENG, RODTRUSSES F a Q- _ �cr)Oi-Uj��— 1: 0 U 0 241 C. u�j Q a WZ4cf>LWZ(X V Z 61 w INFIRSTTWO i BUSS BAYS) CING m 12-6" II TREATED /oX/o z W fL (X U ZO UO } fA W U N I'-13i4" lL 12'-3/4 2z. U O '� POST (TYP,) d QiL IX 14'-4/4 i ' 2 PLY 9'h" 2,OE MIGROLLAMS (DROPPED) FLUSH ENTRY „111� � I FALSE BEA S h1 w Z � --31_Oli cv w _ z_ w o° o � � � _z �� Iw •• QNa� JU U w ° lu F Q a w _ W _Z LL° w o m C REA U At N WINDOWNOTES: ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 9 'D w 4 IQ `9 ° Q N W w '� O SCREENED o A* O ALL WINDOWS a PATIO DOORS SPECIFIED O W W Q Z U _ s o m Z VAULTED GL It O = u a, U 3'-O ENTRY DOOR ll/4 LIGHT) _ (X V W ; Q a9 ,1 j; LL LL a W W g' I%" PLT HT, 0 /� I ' r ao 4 ON THIS PRINT ARE: MARVIN ESSENTIAL � � 0 5 O W � w U. Q - U VINYL PLK, F R. (�/ POR`iH p VERIFY R.O. PRIOR TO CONST, Q W Q u_ w (VERIFY HEADER SIZE W/ FINAL ~ Q Z Q Q �}� W [Q O iJ3/4" > u w U FLAT CLG. 'U s - [Q 'Q H V IL 4 w o 0 z O VERIFY ALL WINDOW R.O.'S PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (X IL Q Z I FALSE BE MS N TRUSS LAYOUT) W� u ,U O Z - d) a WINDOWS TO MEET FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS U U N W 1-I_ m FIRE RATED STEEL DOOR 20 MIN, RATING Z (X O Z cn 5Y4"X5Y4" PSL Z N i \a 2 PLY 9�" 2,OE 2 JU W (X — O (VERIFY REACTION w N 1 WALL INE ABOVE MIGROLLAMS (FLUSH) VERIFY R.C.ROPRIOR TO CONST, O N W/ FINAL TRUSS a ; = -- - - = = = - - - - - - - - - = - - - - _ WINDOW SUPPLIER TO VERIFY EGRESS 8 TEMPERED GLASS iz O a/ F- � Z cv DRAWINGS) tu �?-tuF- o----------------- - - m H O I a 'n ° z LL z° Q (2 PLY I1 1/8" 2,OE w o' 2 BWL 2 - T - a u = _ o _ BWL 2 2X(o STUD CONSTRUCTION W/ FIRE 71 OL 0 QW l� - cs-wsP - - - + - - - - - - - O N a a a- MICROLL 4M� -_ " g - �� - - - - - - cs-wsP GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: RATED TYPE X DRYWALL ON ALL } O/ W oWauF m�v N I m Z 1� Q >- CL �q 9'-I" =v 2' - 14'-4i4° Li a . OR 3 PLY 2X12 S) Q ' HOUSE/GARAGE CONNECTIONS Z O w =OL y ! µ e ° w Z R.O. s,-O" x II ' ; m ' SOLID SHADED AREAS REP. Z IX O BUILT-IN BENCH i , 1 FLAT CEILING - - i ESSPD9068 cn a ' `r DROP TOP CHORD OF FLOOR - d 2Xo BEARING O a W/ CUBBIES BELOW SHELVES �j m 3 N z " u /� SOLID BEARING DOWN TO CONC, { U (� U N I WkLL LINE 4' STEP DOWN T `'h TRUSS 3" FOR FLUSH SHOWER FLOOR ABOV » w EXT, OF SHEATHING ABOVE , a a + _ _ _ - CALL TRIMMERS TO BE BLOCKED TO FND,) O_ d 24"X24' BUILT-IN ---_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_--_-_-_-_-_-__ -------------------------- 3 LOCKERS ' I u 2 PLY 18" 2.OE MIGROLLAMS W/ 5%a"X5'/4" PSL m iEA. SIpE 2 PLY 9�s 2,OE 9' \a J �, , �kA } (VERIFY REACTIONS w/ FINAL TRUSS DRAWIIGS) „y a = INTERIOR BEARING WALLS ENG, ROOF Q MICROLLAMS w Q (FLUSH BEAM) �Iry MIN, HEADER SPAN FOR DOUBLE PORTAL FRAME 7 .e O - IO" SONO-SKYLIGHT Q- /� TRUSSES g 24" O.C. O S > ' (FLUSH) N\ '_� "'I ,�;� 2/p'-j0%4" (SEE CS-PF DETAIL FOR MORE INFO) z HAVE BLOCKING •� MIDPOINT / 4 O J _ r - Z 0 �UD ROOM W o I - - - - ; n d) w �( 3'-��"_ ° OVERHANG W I m U TOP OF WINDOW R,O, TO SIMPSON LSTA2ro STRAPS (TYP,) / - z FLar cLG, W> M , a u I -1---------------- o Z Q Ao 9'-I%b" PLT HT, w O Q , o , 4�_� ��, I - �,_O�� I w o o 0 -d-^) BE SET AT 6'-113ie ABOVE �I AND SIMPSON ABUII POST BASE (TYP.) CV (V II I II I II - O m �' _ A - '/ LL F vI• 1 �'_2 S 6 _2 VINYL PLK. FLR. a - w PANTRY o v / 1 `� a a z _ SUBFLOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR VISUAU Z ' i• VINYL PLANK O `� ' , �Y , W U _ry w m w O I FLOORING LL® / I I n ) /t I •) O q 4 O- \ = z Y T I La u -p p1 ° DU' w DINING O x �, =e `Q ALL WINDOW AND DOOR HEADERS TO BE W r - - > (� x w x ° } w ' `� La I ° ° ° ° ` - 2 PLY 2XIC'S UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE U J I I 0 , - m FLAT CLG, IL � 'T � � � 1 w q w POCKET DR. = I O 4 wQ z O -1 BRACED WALL LINE NOTES: L�j9'-14" PLT HT. _ IN 2x6 WALL ' mI \�'��,`�) CENTER, NW O w VINYL PLK. FLR, Q N n \ INT. WALL I II (2 PLY 9�' 2.GE MIGROLLAMs (2 PLY 2.o M� oLLAMs I 3 -O" O� _ , DI A E � � !N%. u- `� O d z o `� <t 0 ALL BEAMS HEADERS ARE SIZED ALL BRACED WALL PANELS TO BEGIN �' y I` _l I " o a POCKET DR. I J ` '\ �,�.�, KITCHEN - µ Z w LL w O ' w WITHIN 10'-O FROM EACH END OF A 3 -Oh 3' BUILT-IN BENCH a w iv _ BY Distinctive Drafting B Design m\ ,W/ 2 TRIMMERS ®EA, SIDE) W/ 2 TRIMMERS m EA, SIDE) IN 2X6 WALL ' - O `,.A >�� FLAT CLG, w N U BRACED WALL LINE Z `_ (MIN, PANEL)' (MIN, PANEL)-- I W/ HOOKS ABOVE I I J r O Q (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) ESSPDII ESSPD60/o8 ® mw (X s'-Il-b" PLT HT. _ �y n u u u , In I I ��` \�. .'. d. • A�� VINYL PLK, FLR. BWL 3 R,O, 6'-O x 6'-8 R.O. 6'-O x 6'-8 30" VAN -' _ STONE COUNTERTOPS DISTANCE BETWEEN ADJACENT EDGES O ' - - - - \ \ V �- - - - - - - — a _ - 3/ II _ , II = ADD ADDITIONAL STAIR STRINGER W cs WSP r - MIRROR O 12 IO�i 11 2 4 OF A BRACED WALL PANEL �/ /� 1 OVEN/MICRO SUPPORT AS NEEDED, VERIFY ON SITE ca TERIOR GYPSUM BOARD REQUIRED I 1 nl - 30 `�eQK.=Tb �'`�`�`� �`�� SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 20'-O° U � ® �4 IX MUD ROOM COMBO W/�4_4o_��`� ` ` ` "� 3 PLY 9 " 2.OE O ON THIS WALL FOR WALL BRACING �/' VINYL PLANK N n N _ _ _ _ _ _ L{ - � ��.�'.. ` ��. � 2X6 BEARING EXHAUST FAN VENTED TO EXTERIOR } / _ I 1 / I I FLAT CLG. MICROLLAMS (FLUSH) _ ®- m Q / FLOORING O 9'-lie" PLT HT, m �` O _-_ - _ - _ - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - BRACED WALL LINES CALCULATIONS O 2 _----- --t�. O 1 _ I„I , VINYL PLK, FLR, m o o RAILING TO CODE m ASSUME SEISMIC DESIGN Z Z - 0) 2 SH=LVES m OO OO SHELVES �v I = N ROOF/FLOOR TRUSS d GIRDER TRUSS - - I I I I I� I I - - - - \a q - - - Y 3'-O" / Y "11'L �76 1 151- ° ; I a , N BWL 4 LU CATEGORY A, 115 MPH ULTIMATE DESIGN Q Q - „ w (L <t LOCATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, Q- ` l 2 PLY 2XI01I III I - Z - � w GB REFER TO FINAL TRUSS LAYOUTS WIND SPEED, B EXPOSURE CATEGORY B (1- s� S � ` 5y X5y PSL O ' �`- I„ I N . , I I �7 w - ,Il O 4 Z w Q to \� W/ NO PLATES w Df20P �••IDR. \��\\ ,la" FLOOR TRUSSES II ? p ®� m \ a a q FOR ACTUAL LOCATIONS v s 4 (VERIFY REACTION (III Z q B T �' 24" O.G. III I HARDWOOD D I " z° ' Q > w w/ FINAL TRuss o O - 0 a ,I� BRACED WALL LINES CALCULATIONS .• DRAWINGS) J') / I I O wIII I „ �i I iiry Q �2X4 BRG, w - Q! z w (III 4 °i" RAILING TO CODE „1 O x o o IP = w r LL ALL FLOOR TRUSSES a BEAMS TO NAVE ASSUME BLOCKING BEHIND ALL O - / e/ r= (: J y WALL La IT[ m= p IL 0 i m m V HORIZONTAL SHEATHING JOINTS 5'-10�a 4'-4 8'-I - , 12'-1/4 3„ , �� , "'� d w (L O q u- 4 cq z w A MAX. LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION OF L/45C ! / /// _ ' z o' I `� � o _ B MAX, TOTAL LOAD DEFLECTION OF L/240 30' IIV2" / wll I 18 IS x m Q Q z W O o°W U A-5 C REFER TO SECTION R0FOR MORE INFO upI INJ Q-1 Lu zq 3a-1 Cq ALL BEAMS E HEADERS ON THIS PLAN � O N HARDWOOD RADON w 3 W w w IK 5'-�" sTAIRs �'= ' PIPE III 4'_8„ w m w s ARE WEYERHAEUSER ENGINEERED (III > a a � ,y ,- a w a BRACED WALL PANEL KEY: ww o N z-i O �I' N , ' WOOD PRODUCTS. IF DIFFERENT E (KIIII m �o�� / I. �. I. I. (III o cp IL Q CX U� ~ z ° OR Ifv'USYI BRAND IS USED, VERIFY SIZE 8 DEPTH � CS-PF WALL PANEL IN THIS AREA ONLY u U Q z RAILING TO CODE C ��'" U (III - FLOOR GIRDER TRUSS SUPPLIED Oq a N �; N R_ _O_D_ S_H_, I PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 118 MIN.) Q� r D► w BY TRUSS MANUFACTURER p N° ° S.D./co.D. O p U I = **SEE BRACED WALL DETAIL FOR FRAMING INFO v, U z N OR o z p BEAM/HEADER SUPPLIER TO VERIFY **2 PLY 2x12 (MIN,) HEADER OVER THIS WALL O - (III LL FLUSH FLOOR BEAM SIZED ° = (REACTION ."X5v.' N O THAT ALL BEAMS, POSTS, AND HEADERS Qin ENTRY (3/0" MIN,) BRACED WALL PANEL £ O _ IX ° _ w L W/ NO �� WILL SUPPORT ROOF, AND FLOOR LOADS 86 O N Z N BY SUPPLIER w LATES FLAT CLG. 2'_6" �� Z 1/16 O,S,B. SHEATHING z �4 (Y q I (III °� (BOTTOM OF BEAM TO BE FLUSH oVERIFY e'-I�" PLT HT. " U PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION NAILED 10 ro" O,C, 'm EDGES (3 �/ 0 w w Z W/ VINYL PLK. FLR. -5i4 1-11 4-/O �" `'Ir-1 Q w (III x W/ TOP OF MAIN FLR, PLATE - AL TRUSS �j < / /� AND 12" O,G, IN FIELD -� �' '°,U AWINGS) (� p \ X 04 z Q **SEE $;�TION 3/A,5 FOR VISU/AU %4"x5�" �0 so N ROOF CONSTRUCTION E ATTACHMENTS w `� Q C) c+l S = - l5 (III �` PSL POST w >` E I Q WALL LINE ABOVE ` b' _ z TO BE IN ACCORDANCE TO MN mC14 w F-.- o _1 O �� B,-10/=" (III J� 21-0 z G �Iv O RESIDENTIAL CODE (SEE SECTIONS 1— C4_ , ,18 FLOOR TRUSSES ----Q----Q�----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- — —`� —_ —_ — — — — — — — - �=4Ss I � � R301 a RSOI FOR ADDITIONAL INFO) \ � F----- -- �D----------------------------------------------------------------------------��-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-_-_-_ — — _ _ _ _ _ _ - o o 24 O,C, .4 m ._ ' 60 GIRDER TRUSS SUPPLIED - - - L S.D. 3 BY TRUSS MANUFACTURER q O O p - 0 0 ROOF TRUSSES INSTALLED PER MANUF, m p Ei S, 1z Q �'� ' �' m�a _� w SPECS/DRAWINGS B MN RESIDENTIAL m o O c� `9 m� U CODE SECTION R&02,10 `' O B a GARAGE (III o OFFICE w a r LT CLG. C01 ° INSULATE WALLS AND CEILING ° _� 9FI BA PLT HT, ROOF UPLIFT CONNECTION TO BE IN o GYP, BOARD AND TAPE (III \ - j VINYL PLK. FLR. ACCORDANCE TO MANUFACTURERS ENTIRE GARAGE Ik' 23'-5V2 : \ _ 1 STEP UP RECOMMENDATIONS s PER MINNE50TA O RESIDENTIAL CODE x CIA TYPICAL GARAGE FLOOR : - f z - (SEE CODE RB02.11 FOR MORE INFO) s 4" CONCRETE SLAB W/ (III w O w 4 O iy Ca 6X6 10/10 WELDED WIRE MESH (III cp W m v TEMP. TEMP. O uI COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL (III U tz GENERAL DECK GONST. NOTES: Wi SLOPE CON(. TOWARDSLL LL 0 FLOOR DRAIN W/ (III O = 18'-0" X 8'-0" O H GARAGE DOOR - p p ESDH3060 ESDH30/o0 ATTACH DECK LEDGER WITH LAG BOLTS IS'-O" X 8'-O" O,H, GARAGE DOOR O N IN -FLOOR HEAT W- W/ 2 PLY I/o 2,OE MIGROLLAM O r0 R,O, 3'-O x 6'-O R,O, 3'-O x 6-O I THAT PENETRATE INTO RIM JOIST OR SI W/ 3 PLY IS" 2.OE MIGROLLAM W/ 3 TRIMMERS a EA, SIDE COVERED WOOD / u WALL STUDS PER MN CODE REQUIREMENTS mW/ 5i4"X5i4" PSL EA. SIDE z OR PORCH /k " o `"��O O USE MANUFACTURERS REQUIRED FASTENERS (GLASS TOP PANELS) LU 3 PLY 14" 2,OE MICROLLAM ,DECKING DIRECTION °o a� ,*W/ WALL MOUNTED DOOR OPENER(III BWL 5 W/ 2 TRIMMERS EA, SIDE 2 PLY 2XI0's _ _� BWL 5 - - - " - - - - - - ABOVE aXa ROUGH - - Z N - - - - - - - GS-WSP spy SET TOP OF HEADER g UNDERSIDE OF (GLASS TOP PANELS) w N ALL FASTENERS IN CONTACT W/ TREATED spy �f 7c ` ` I I I I SAWN CEDAR POST 7c I, D :_k_ 7c�{ . { TOP PLATES TO FULLY BRACE HEADER p W/ WALL MOUNTED DOOR OPENER 'TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED - _ - - - _ _ - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ LUMBER TO BE IN ACCORDANCE TO � I/ FOR LATERAL STABILITY 3 PLY 2X10'S (DROPPED) �/.mayr�_ OTHERWISE) _ _ _ " MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS �(� 13 v SET TOP OF HEADER w UNDERSIDE OF `. `. \ \ _ �: " PORCH ROOF TO BE BASED OF� \ ` \ (SEE MN RESIDENTIAL CODE �� O 51'4"X54" PSL 'S /� TOP PLATES TO FULLY BRACE HEADER �m i ;; EDGE OF WOOD PORCH /) SECTION R311.3,1 FOR MORE INFO) fj W N (VERIFY REACTION FOR LATERAL STABILITY cp n = ENG. ROOF _ n - O W/ FINAL TRUSS O m " TR SSES m 24" O,C, " m'� - O W O N d) N cYl liz>DRAWINGS) Q cY1 " " �zt �zt SZt DECK CONStRUGtION TO BE IN �Zt 1-- (�/ p1 N m Q O ACCORDANCE TO MN EXTERIOR - ` WcLu p N �O �O DECK CODE (SEE MN RESIDENTIALW CODE SECTION R501 FOR MORE INFO) � _/ Q N 6� / NOTE... ALL DIMENSIONING �,� ��-------------- __ /�� S /�0 3 o ? A II II S II II / / Z J� (Q Q IS TO THE EXTERIOR OF //o � (Z)b '; --------8'_O 3/4 Tie 10'-4/a � /o /o Z w THE SHEATHING �/ r , I LLLu %w.4 , 2-4 ILL oLu �z Oki FLOOR FLAN �� {�'t`� /� /� III v w �+ �4� ~Od Iz a_-W z� II I II V HOUSE/GARAGE WALE 6� — 12' / 12'-9" 12'-9" 12' w�/? I" i 4'-e5/4'I u/ 3'-4V2" i 4'-e5/4" / A3 SC,4LE: 1�� = 1 -O 6� x 25'-" 25'-/O" 4'-O" 13'-O" / FINISHED SQ, FT, - 1395 O W ro DIMENSIONING IS TO l T�IXTR EXTERIOR O� STUD 1 ' ��4R�E SQ. �T. - 1�5g SQ. FT. � FLOOR AREAS ARE FOR n'-0 COVERED SCREENED i�ORCI-E SQ, FT, - ��✓'O CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY.Lu OVERALL DIMENSIO / SQ, FT, f AREAS ARE NOT TO BE HOUSE (NOTE: SQ, FT, IS MEASURED N �fL w N FROM EXT. OF S E�4TI-ZINC � USED FOR MARKETING PURPOSES 2023 Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLC SHEET ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BRACED WALL LINE SPACING BRACED WALL LINE SPACING NO UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION A3 OF (o WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT In In In I its ma's O ma's O ma's O ez C3 RACED WALL LINE SPACING ml BRACED WALL LINE SPACING CL 6 s J J m J y O m� O m`� m� WALL LINE BELOW -�� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I — L I I I I I 5'-r0%4° /I 2'-103/411 I � I m Q x 5'-011 R.O. 3'-O" x I ESDH3050 ESDH3050 2 F�AME WALL TO - - - - - _ - WALL LINE BELOW _ - - - - _ - - - - - ,L�,Gj - J UNDERSBALL�DENO' 5r SSOR TRUSS A5 = 54"X5i4" PSL x 2'-0" R.O. 2'-O" x 21-011 POST EBDHF2020 ESDHF2020 ROD 4 SHELF L W ~ W I� BEDROOM #1 mw .O J Q III Q Q IL VAULTED CLG. LL N PLT HT. � I � L (�5 45" +� VAN 4 MIRROR 1 4S" VAN 4 MIRROR: O l�q VINYL PLK. FLR. Im u! J = o A*�� IIII z -_t 1D tp IU,I,C, _I IU r TILE a J \ 22'1 VINYL PLANK I I FLOORINGS w IU ??T O ATiT/IC FLOORING I U CQ 2'-9%s" 2 � �- 4'-I i11 IIII J 3'-8� � mFLIJ r �a � II r ----------------------- SHELVES ,, �♦ ROD 4 SHELF - - -CUSTOM FRAMER z suowER w/ J ROOF TRUSSES _ ��. TILE FLOOR 0 Lll Z =� -A 24 1 O.C. J -i �.: O �` AND WALLS F r - - - - - - - - - - - - -WALL LINE BELOW - - - - - - Z BEDROOM *2 N c0 FLATCLG,---------------- ---------------- V rrr+++ IL a' -I%" PLT Hr. BUILT �NS — �� (L �f - O N VINYL PLK, FLR. LINEN OII 1 \ �/ — - � z I I -CONSTRUCTION PERMIT OFFICES- WAIVER 6 ONLY TO ACCEPT THIS PLAN IF THE WORD 'Sz'� "ORIGINAL SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED � w 8 Q� 8��r� omz�wOu�z ORIGINAL O ww00J IT IS ,AESO UNLAWFUL FOR THIS PRINT TO BE n z u m �- REPRODUCED. UNLESS THE WORD u ff z Q 3: II W ORIGINALII SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED V Dw 1y O O 11 w z z PERMISSION ONLY TO BE GRANTED BY i Q u w g O O Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLG, d 0 w w zI(KQ q w n U z 4 O Z Qw�www oz zwAi�u3N� LU Z z 0 O W � 4 � =OO(Yp�� \� \ (K0W�Z13Z�Li �WLQOw�'Q�Z w-gz063fL0w z Or~UjF->-z1y WINDOW NOTES: ff Z Q- Z w N u- 6 U wg0Tl-zx=!1Y ALL WINDOWS 4 PATIO DOORS SPECIFIED W Q- W U ZO 0 0 % CO w ON THIS PRINT ARE: MARVIN ESSENTIAL BWL I_ GS-IUSP � w III -ro I� , - \ cv CLOSET iv - T - _ }f • �I♦ -wry - x `/ "/,(�j ` , I I I I I I I _ I ID t" �` O rT'. z \ 4'-O //v I �ry �� N , z Q Y _ m N^ N - = cn mud _ �/ IIII r ®in �� N oW11 . 10 y tp �" �'V�`+ I` J I IBIS 'S, o} O 4 R J. p z �s U �• O O N I �I'�I W I I OBI IN I I I O O O _ t� to = o Q -' `•�� S'D" m IIII I QO I RAI INO TOI�ODc p LL O X(L P - w > LL fY mm_ L HARDWOOD Q O Q IC m- '� Oi r z Q' O S -li4" �'-I" 2'-6" w S.D./ O.D. O I I I I I I STAIRS 3 4 z13 - j - Ul ' 1, I LL O O Q m 3 W 0 1 Z 4'-23/411 / 3'-lo 11 A L EN N ♦ 3 q VINYL PLANK � I R�D N : O � W � J p � QCj OI♦ J „ / � BI T cD LL PI E' a O N O 4 N FLOORINGS 4 O m u, I 3 q J ♦+ 'I II N ` Q II I �I I I I II IIVE)•1T oIRE�i 2) II r q I \a Lu 3 m 5'8'-O w l� `t qw N / II I II II �, N L II I I I I 1 I N LL -O �( 2'3'-8 W IS � Lu LL p = TILE o a 0> ROD 4 SHELF 4 J lU N w p~ II _ FLOORING W N 4 m------------------ iX = 3 1 iu X J Z I '1 U cxv TILE iJJ,1,C. m +n ® 0 �Q ' VINYL PLANK I r O W? FLOORING_ N lu (0 p X FLOORING (� VINYL PLANK U = N O I O FLOORING NO cp l \a O 66° VAN 8 "11RROR 2 -�o ' i m I � 4'-4 Z " BWL 2- a I ESDHP2020 E6DHP2020 R.O. 2'-0" x 2'-O" R.O. 2'-0" x 2'-011 5%4"X5%4" PSL LAUNEA;R� POST VINYL PLANKI FLOORINGi O 6'-Oi411 ►11 11 -(.ova" 0 DRYER WA HER I ----I -a I ,ENG. ROOF TRUSSES y ` Q 24" O.C. N I I ESDHP202O RHO. 2'-0" x 21-011 BEDROOM 03 \ Y FLAT CLG. 0 Ii 8'-Ub" PLT HT. VINYL PLK. FLR, I I TEMP. TEMP. i I I—ESDH30rb0T Li ' cs-wsP I I I I I I I 10 .40 ---- Aj I I� _ L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WALL LINE BELOW- - - - - - - - - `t I l L - - - �� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WALL LINE BELOW - J - - - -� - - I - - r O c> O se VERIFY ALL WINDOW R.O.'S PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WINDOWS TO MEET FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS WINDOW SUPPLIER TO VERIFY EGRESS 4 TEMPERED GLASS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: SOLID SHADED AREAS REP, SOLID BEARING DOWN TO GONG. (ALL TRIMMERS TO BE BLOCKED TO FND.) TOP OF WINDOW R.O. TO BE SET AT 61-113/8" ABOVE SUBFLOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL WINDOW AND DOOR HEADERS TO BE 2 PLY 2X10'6 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL BEAMS 4 HEADERS ARE SIZED BY Distinctive Drafting 4 Design (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) ADD ADDITIONAL STAIR STRINGER S SUPPORT AS NEEDED, VERIFY ON SITE ® - EXHAUST FAN VENTED TO EXTERIOR ROOF/FLOOR TRUSS 4 GIRDER TRUSS 0.LOCATION5 ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, REFER TO FINAL TRUSS LAYOUTS FOR ACTUAL LOCATIONS O 7 ALL FLOOR TRUSSES 4 BEAMS TO HAVE A MAX. LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION OF L/450 �C 4 MAX, TOTAL LOAD DEFLECTION OF L/240 LI ALL BEAMS 4 HEADERS ON THIS PLAN ARE WEYERHAEUSER ENGINEERED WOOD PRODUCTS. IF DIFFERENT BRAND IS USED, VERIFY SIZE 4 DEPTH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BEAM/HEADER SUPPLIER TO VERIFY THAT ALL BEAMS, POSTS, AND HEADERS WILL SUPPORT ROOF, AND FLOOR LOADS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION< ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION` NOTES: DROP TOP CHORD OF FLOOR 4 TRUSS 3" FOR FLUSH SHOWER FLOOR BRACED WALL LINE NOTES: ALL BRACED WALL PANELS TO BEGIN WITHIN 10'-0" FROM EACH END OF A BRACED WALL LINE DISTANCE BETWEEN ADJACENT EDGES OF A BRACED WALL PANEL SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 20'-0" BRACED WALL LINES CALCULATIONS ASSUME SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY A, 115 MPH ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEED, 4 EXPOSURE CATEGORY B BRACED WALL LINES CALCULATIONS ASSUME BLOCKING BEHIND ALL HORIZONTAL SHEATHING JOINTS REFER TO SECTION R602.10 FOR MORE INFO L �zl II � I I I I I 9 I n u n n u n u u 4-2�4 ��, 3-10/2 2-Oi 2-1/4 � 2-3i � 2-3/4 , 4-9/a 3-4� 4-9�4 (zl! / r Q. 2'-100'I llf II 4 -1is11 / 5'-lOi4° ,'//O"� �1� �0NDLOOR FLAN ' 3a'-o" A4 %8C,4LE: 1/411 = 11-011 m D1 BID �`{<� FINISHED SQ, FT, - 1210 6 I BRACED WALL LINE SPACING BRACED WALL LINE SPACING I s < (NOTE: SQ. FT. IS MEASURED NOTE... ALL DIMENSIONING IS TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE SHEATHING � , FROM EXT, OF SHEATHINIG� w z u > O=Lu LuO LU ZgLI��W w(L U \ O d) (X U�u�wzU_ Zdww>_(yOzT u— �z1�L pLlT�w OOz tL(L u (L u C 0. Lu CQ L 1 Z [Q w // 4 O Z ' 4 n (� LA 11Q— IF 0 � u rn Q Q K £ •• (� +j `� 14-1 �' m m E Q Q Q� 4Nu m X cri Q / �i u O > m e01 CIwOLL1 A- m Q m �'Lu ono 4 O/ �� U=q La � wN� - �r— . \J z u-Lu l Lu F- x Ow 1 • N SQ. FT. 4 FLOOR AREAS ARE FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY, SQ. FT, f AREAS ARE NOT TO BE N USED FOR MARKETING PURPOSES © 2023 Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLG ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET NO UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION 44 OF �o WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT I I ALL ITEMS WITH A DOUBLE BOX BORDER HAVE BEEN ENGINEERED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAID, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS - PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT '0 �f 12 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LICENSED PRO�SSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER - ENGINEERED TRUSSES 0 24" O.C. 12 THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. � 2° CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM W/ BLOWN INSUL. TO R-49 TOTAL (MIN.) SIGNED: �� !�/ ' �� (TRUSS DESIGN PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER) PRINTED: ROBBIE HYLAND �% 7/•C� ' rr/� /�lu DATE: �p;l--3 LICENSE. NO.: 49580 6 _ \m SEE DETAILS B,a, `r .. —' FOR ADDITIONAL INFO o ON EXTERIOR FINISHING o BEDROOM #2 BEDROOM 02 AND MATERIALS p STAIR HANDRAIL W/ RETURNS p w 12 \ TO CODE \ F N ENGINEERED TRUSSES 6 24" O.C. Ili I / \� w 4• ✓ , �\ STAIR CONSTRUCTION- 12 W/ R-49 (MIN.) BLOWN INSULATION � uve" TIMBERSTRAND 4 z ::j w (TRUSS DESIGN PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER) "jjj,, -\ P TRINCsERS _ _ Q (� p 12 �Q HANGER TRUSSES ��```•••�� \ \ BD TREADS �I�jJII �I�jJII m AS NEEDED IIIII�yIIII II �pIIII�yIII 5/411 Td CjUBF OR'I 1J ` XS RISERS .-i Q W W CU CU ......... _::: --------------- ------------ bl .��„ ,�'rl'.��.F,'6T"�,�. �.� �..�..�.. ��.��..�`Se ,'.��..,. �.�,1 4 ". _ -) - — _ Cn _ Lu z ~ o - Lu W/ R-30 CLOSED CELL SPRAY ,9 r= = a l _ - FOAM INSULATION S - - ~ F w MUD ROOM NOTE: SPRAY FOAM INSUL. i �j'P ? _ = a '' O GARAGE iii— s w- m AROUND MECHANICALS w ! r Q 1� � � �m AND � RIMS m � fll, , -'�./ �� = _ � lu w � -1 w h O lbw iY p �� k'AND FRAME STAIR ' [L w D O ROOM WID HALL O .� I j' - -- ll AN ING W, 2XIO - tk Q- �� 0 Jols�� O.C. 4 kn �LL N Z j i (TYPICAL) zp IwY 16 o ILL X GARAGE �� m z w N /& /M /� r/ % - m a Op "6 s 1 :: ---- ---- ---- ---- -----� 8" FLOOR TRUSSES 24" O.C. -----� IS" F OR T USSES 24" :1® p �// �// �w/ 5/4" TtG SUBFLOORZ. _ 11 i 5/4 T x SUBF DOOR H d a� GRADE = �� = STAIR a �a e ` _ CLOSET o 3: I GRADE 4" CONCRETE FLOOR W/o IN -FLOOR HEAT D °° - - - D o Fr = _ = _ _ -j1 I - - _ _ �� = - 4 CONCRETE FLOOR W/ a� 2" FOAM INSULATION BELOW SLAB ° ®® ®® ®® ®® - °o` _ ;�- (TOP OF FOAM TO BE FLUSH W/ TOP OF LEDGE) II II II NSFLOOR HEAT 2 FOAM D ' \ INSULATION BELOW SLAB I� 1 ��II II�� 1 III 11 kT HALL o °�' III II II l l l l l l l l l II II (TOP OF FOAM TO BE FLUSH W/ TOP OF LEDGE) III 1 II II 6' z , WALL IIB D ' II II II I� III' II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II ? ills] 11%I I 111I II 11 11111111 1 11111111 11 II 11 111 I1 " CONCRETE FLOOR W/ I -FLOOR EAT a 4`' CONCRETE FLd6R W�11%1-PLa) I-IEAT WALL "C" 2" FOAM INSULATION BELOW SLAB WALL "CII 2" FOAM INSULATION BELOW SLAB WALL "E" (TOP OF FOAM TO BE FLUSH W/ STAIR SECTION (TOP OF FOAM TO BE FLUSH W/ I TOP OF LEDGE/FTG.) ,4�j SCALE: 1/411 = 11-011 TOP OF LEDGE/FTG.) Y tj NEUJEL AND BALUSTERS GARAGE ROOF CONSTRUCTION- ROSSETTE PER CUSTOMER/BUILDER / ARCHITECTURAL ASPH SHINGLES /� WOOD RAILING HANDRAIL HEIGHT: 15"ROOFING FELT / / 34" MIN, AND 30" MAX \� BALUSTER 1/2I SHOE RAIL O.S.B. ' OPENINGS TO BE i � SKIRT BOARD CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT �+� LESS THAN 4" BALUSTER \ CASING AIR CHUTES m EA. TRUSS SPACE , CTREAD 2 ROWS ICE 4 WATER (UP EAVE) O NEWELL POST , PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES ,m 24" o.c. 12 , V2 GYP 2x4 TRUSS BRACING �6 SKIRT BOARD rl R-49 (MIN.) BLOWN INSULATION � \ X 4 MIL POLY V.B. 3: 6" DIAM, SPHERE GARAGE WALL CONSTRUCTION - SIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) -1/16 O.S. SHE ATHING E ATHIN G 2x6 STUDS a 16" o.c. R-20 (MIN.) BATT INSULATION 4 MIL POLY V.B. SILL ASSEMBLY- 1/2" DIA, ANCHOR BOLT Q -12" o.c. (MAX) 2x6 PRESSURE TREATED SILL PLATE 1/4" SILL GASKET 12 4 BOX GIRDER ROOF TRUSS �w w FLOOR GIRDER TRUSS � RAISE HEADER— BY TRUSS MANUFACTURER FOR LATERAL OR STABILITY FLUSH BEAM (V =RIFY W/ TRUSS DRAWING) / CANNOT PASS CASING \ THROUGH IN OPEN RAIL CONSTRUCTION STAIR DETAIL SCALE: 1/4 11= 1 1-O 11 s HOUSE ROOF CONSTi�UCTION•- ARCHITECTURAL ASPH SHINGLES 15• ROOFING FELT 1/2" O.S.B. CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT j\ AIR CHUTES m EA. TRUSS SPACE' 2 ROWS ICE 4 WATER (UP EAVE) 1 PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES 6 24" o.c. 1 2x4 TRUSS BRACING 2" CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM s� W/ BLOWN INSUL. TO R-49 TOTAL (MIN.) 0 2X6 SUB FASCIA Y� ALUMINUM SOFFIT 4 FASCIA 50 o OF VENTING PROVIDED BY SOFFIT HOUSE WALL CONSTRUCTION - SIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) -1/16" O.S.B. SHEATHING 2x6 STUDS m 16" o.c. R-20 (MIN.) CLOSED CELL INSULATION INTERIOR TRIM/DOOR STYLE PER CUSTOMER/BUILDER **FRAMER TO ALLOW FOR 3i2" TRIM a ALL WIND. AND DOOR LOCATIONS CLOSED CELL INSUL. a RIM (R-20 MIN.) (SEE RIM DETAILS FOR MORE INFO) SILL ASSEMBLY- 1/2" DIA. ANCHOR BOLT 6 12" o.c. (MAX) 2x6 PRESSURE TREATED SILL PLATE 1/4" SILL GASKET FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION- I.C.F. FDN. WALL (WIDTH, HEIGHT, AND FTG. SIZE PER FDN. PLAN) DRAIN TILE WATERPROOFING (CONCRETE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL REBAR IN FOUNDATION WALLS 4 FOOTINGS AS NEEDED PER CODE) 6 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER UNDER CONC (LAPPED 12" MIN. 6 EDGES) ALL ICF WALLS ARE BASED ON Fox Blocks SPECS- - 1I HIGH - FOAM WIDTH OF 2-5/011 - CORE SIZE PER FND. NOTES *CIF DIFFERENT BRAND IS USED, VERIFY SIZE 4 DEPTH PRIOR TO CONST, TREAD MATERIAL PER SPEC BOOK 3/4'' RISER 1011 CUT RISER HEIGHT r 0 STRINGER NOT TO EXCEED �3i4'''r TYPICAL STAIR DETAIL SCALE: 1/2 11 = 11-011 —PITCH PER ELEVATIONS ROOF TRUSOZO 2 CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM W/ BLOWN INSUL. TO 1R-4S TOTAL (MIN.) / 12 HEEL HEIGHT WILL I" AIR CHUTES FULL WIDTH OF EACH X VARY W/ DIFFERENT TRUSS SPACE ` ROOF PITCHES SHINGL^� w NOTE: IF HEEL IS OVER 914", r Z ADDITIONAL BLOCKING IS IZ� ` r ` ` ` I REQUIRED w BRACED RIGID WINDWASH BARRIER - WALL PANEL LOCATIONS / CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER ROOF EDGE VENTED ALUMINUM ��` m� Lu _ y� ® O O v, FASCIA W/ 2X6 SUBFASCIA SOFFIT (ALL TO BE _ _ —INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD d ) Iu ;I 0 f PERFORATED) I _ o GARAGE W_ _ z � EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING, o /h (L w CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM / PIN CONC, APRON 3: L ` I TRUSS DETAIL (�I�E) (TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER) INTO FND WALL AS `� �► �: _ `� r NEED— SGALE: 1"= 11-0 II GRADE ,n D` v a 1 ® 1 7 lu Ise a, - -° BATH O'7 q 11LU WALL ''B" �/Qlll! D� _ w a M.O. �//O 3 II 11�1 II II II ��\ C,ARAC,E SECTION IICII 3 _°LI "� , GRADE A5 SCALE: 1/4� = 11_011 WALK 4" CONCRETE FLOOR W/ IN -FLOOR HEAT 2 FOAM INSULATION BELOW SLAB s� (` (TOP OF FOAM TO BE FLUSH W/ �.! TOP OF LEDGE/FTG.) WALL "J" w m°J - - -„� €a W I I3o ao [I Io �2 15 i �m zoLL= I l3 W lu = z m W UJ,I,C, o -4 W,1,C, wN�U a z ~�)a a [I Qo [L ' o €I a o U- l BEDROOM #2 p I w a 12 T; 'AA A A., ZAN / Ul/ K-:5V C:LVStV C.tLL SPRAY FOAM INSUL. - - - - - - - - - - _ - DASHED LINE REPRESENTS - - - NOTE: SPRAY FOAM INSUL. DROPPED BEAM BEYOND AROUND MECHANICALS MUD ROOM AND 6 RIMS W I � - Q PANTRY C IDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) HOUSEWRAP LAP ALL JOINTS (6" MIN.) XVTERIOR WALL SHEATHING CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM (TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER) I I 1 11111„IIIIIII „I„I„1„I„1 LINTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR PARTITION WALL INTERSECTION DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 11-011 a- w w -CONSTRUCTION PERMIT OFFICES- WAIVER s ONLY TO ACCEPT THIS PLAN IF THE WORD "ORIGINAL SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED � W c4 Q iY omz�EDI_ ORIGINALoff< WO ZI— WOOS IT IS ,AESO UNLAWFUL FOR THIS PRINT TO BE n z 1 u u m - u �- REPRODUCED. UNLESS THE WORD w u 7" iY Z z-12 Ww fKOd— ORIGINAL" SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED � D (K O O Q- W Z z PERMISSION ONLY TO BE GRANTED BY 0 u w -q O O Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLG, d q w W o f W� o~ 1� 4 4 W m U Z 4 4 z � W W w 0 z fW_J3: Dd) 12�JW Z Q p Z 12 S m�ow4��oo N W i j c6 '4 ILc� �Y 1 =�ff�p�0vi� Lu FOUW_1ZOZ0(� -m 1L��1-U 0(y� BALLOON FRAME WALL TO �� W O Z N q) (Yz (>- ZWq)_Ll0 UN E SI E OF S ISSO T USS W d N w I- Z fV n, D R D G R R fI } J w] O 0 f u3 ff 12lu IIIIII [I WfL(KUzU �fQW 12 BEDROOM 01 w ALSE w BEAM E V p p = O SIMPSON LSTA36 W} STRAPS (TYP. I u = WW AS SHOWN) I I 11 u _ N 'D p `' �` • I I ', •4( I I LEDGER AS NEEDED FOR p Z u- JU O to O rV W W L12 �@ ROOF TRUSS ATTACHMENT _ / J �'" TIG SUB L OR -- 0 SIMPSON HH6 -' IS" FL O TRUSS 8 a 24" O. HEADER CLIPS br�KA t-V rt -- NVIt• T INSUL pI AROUND MECHANICALS 4HH4iiI,,., AND 'P RIMS I. « «« IIJ LL "� +' w IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIJ m 0 J (4) 2x6 TURNED I` OIL iil : mom ,-I.-IIITIIIrII nn nuu = 3 1 ON END (TYP.) I W « «u uu uzzz p 67 Z �; � «� _� I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU (3) 511," LYL .n utt tttt ttzzz STUDS `�Ci w II III III IIIIIIIIII III III gu gug g gu gz gzg gz i LL l3) 5'h" LYL ING STUD( W ««« g«gg«gg«g W/ lU 515" LYL ggg I +I _ TRIMMER ISCREENED POI►: ««« I� 11 0 ' III it tttt# I m GREAT ROOM « L IS" FLO RUSSE °90.C. 2X10 JOISTS 9 IIIO.C. II /s/'T S FL O I I• IZ 112 PLY Ilia" LVL�� SIMPSON LSTA36 lkI AS SHOWN) �.r 0 II i z FUTURE FAMILY ROOM 1 GRADE a �t a s.o of GRADE FTGDINII WALL "J" WALL "J" CROSS SECTION II5II AS SCALE: 1/4 11 = 11_011 51DING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) HOUSEWRAP LAP ALL JOINTS (Il MIN.) EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING 2X6 CORNER STUDS CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM (TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER) IOR GYPSUM BOARD OUTSIDE CORNER DETAIL SCALE: 1 = 1 -O Ar % 10 / 2" CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM WITH BLOWN INSUL. TO R-4S TOTAL (MIN.) �Q // KOOF TRUSS BOTTOM CHORD CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ "NTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD c = �ft�� INTERIOR PARTITION WALL ATTIC SPACE SCALE: 111 = 11-011 fL o_ "q ww �ZO�z� c�nZu- OOz 0- U � d Z x % % L m Q W �` y/ O Z z 4 � � Ll LA q 0 �U DECK/SCREENED PORCH DETAILS q o a Ln RAIL m MIN 36" HEIGHT TO MEET 86 r z u CODE REQUIREMENTS c 4" MAX. (1 Q m BETWEEN SPINDLES GALVANIZED FLASHING UNDER SIDING 4 OVER ni JOISTSin 5/4"x\ m x ro 1 0 DECKING TRTD. JOISTS �J V Q- TREATED HDR � �i 6X6 TREATED JOIST HANGER \ POST I V O TRTD. DECK %%% CONC. FTG. LEDGER (SIZE 4 DEPTH o ' PER FDN. PLAN) o ova DECK FRAMING DETAIL SCALE: 1/2" = 11-OII 6X6 TREATED POST SIMPSON ABUII POST BASE �' 10, (MIN.) CUT w 6; cjj N Q N a JX RISER HEIGHT �`� O STRINGER 4 (L/ 6, W W NO SONO TUBE NOT TO EXCEED 15/411 I W Q- - a) BELLED 9 BASE (SIZE PER a U = Q - TYPICAL STAIR DETAIL o d `" 9) FOUNDATION PLAN) �C Q C a 'Z VCALE: 1/211 = 11-011 3 O = / z u- (k co 0 POST FTC, DETAIL o a " SCALE: 1/2" = 11-0" O's W cv SQ. FT. 4 FLOOR AREAS ARE FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY. SQ. FT, f AREAS ARE NOT TO BE N USED FOR MARKETING PURPOSES 11 © 2023 Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLG ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET NO UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION A OF WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT IS INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD R-20 (MIN.) CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM (TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER) EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING =:1HOUSE WRAP (EXTEND DOWN WALL _ _ 7 TO A POINT BELOW THE SILL PLATE) -SIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) >< FLOOR TRUSS 2x4 NAILER ALONG TOP EDGE OF TRUSS SYSTEM ' CLOSED CELL INSUL. 'a RIM � � (R-20 MIN.) 2X4 LADDER = V2" O,S.B. SHEATHING m RIM TRUSS SUPPLIED 2x4 NAILER ALONG BOTTOM EDGE OF TRUSS BY TRUSS MANUFACTURER ` ` SILL SEAL UNDER 2X6 PRESSURE "SHEETROCK ON TREATED PLATE ' Ol UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR TRUSSES TO MEET FIRE PROTECTION 6 Q `p Ir/� • p OF FLOORS CODE D SEAL ALL INTERIOR JOINTS, o° o o a EDGES f PENETRATIONS I ,o a ,o' GRADE LINE 'D D •'D NOTE: SEE POURED ICF FOUNDATION (THICKNESS A° ° a °° ° FOUNDATION DETAIL d HT, PER FDN, PLAN) I p p - FOR WATERPROOFING INFO n n 2x4 LADDER TRUSS RIM a FOUNDATION DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 1'-O" FLOOR TRUSS SYSTEM 2Xlo LADDER TRUSS SUPPLIED = BY TRUSS - MANUFACTURER ` ` GRADE LINE D D D OPTIONAL 2x6 LADDER TRUSS >< FLOOR TRUSS SYSTEM INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM (TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER) EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING HOUSE WRAP (EXTEND DOWN WALL TO A POINT BELOW THE SILL PLATE) SIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) CLOSED CELLINSUL, 6 RIM V2" O.S.B. SHEATHING -6 RIM II I_ _II I RIM DETAIL lw FRAMING SCALE: 1" = 1'-0 II INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD 2X6 STUDS W/ R-20 (MIN.) CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM (TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER) =r R-20 (MIN.) CLOSED NOTE: SEE FOUNDATION CELL SPRAY PLAN FOR FINISHED AND - EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING FOAM (TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER) UNFINISHED AREAS - - HOUSE WRAP (EXTEND DOWN WALL - - TO A POINT BELOW THE SILL PLATE) EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING - SIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) SILL SEAL UNDER 2X6 PRESSURE HOUSE WRAP (EXTEND DOWN WALL TREATED PLATE TO A POINT BELOW THE SILL PLATE) ` '� SEAL ALL INTERIOR JOINTS, .c - SIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) ° a ° ' FLOOR TRUSS >� EDGES 4 PENETRATIONS c / SYSTEM D D .'D 'D CLOSED CELL INSUL. RIM ICF FOUNDATION (THICKNESS o ° o ° o E HT, PER FDN. PLAN) > a GRADE LINE (R-20 MIN.) _ ,\/ ,.p ° �.p ° us" SHEETROCK ON ` ` �� - NOTE: SEE POURED UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR TRUSSES D D D TO MEET FIRE PROTECTION O.S.B. SHEATHING � RIM �� ij _ o ° o ° - FOUNDATION DETAIL OF FLOORS CODE �/ ° a ° FOR WATERPROOFING INFO SILL SEAL UNDER 2X6 PRESSURE CQ (D^ D C" �� o° SEAL ALL INTERIOR JOINTS, a - TREATED PLATE EDGES f PENETRATIONS - p p ICF FOUNDATION (THICKNESS "°_°• a o° ° o° GRADE LINE WALL 'm FOUNDATION DETAIL 8 HT, PER FDN. PLAN) I p ° Q % ° - NOTE: SEE POURED FOUNDATION DETAIL SCALE: 1" - 1'-OII a n - FOR WATERPROOFING INFO `Ci - A 'n RADON VENT TERMINATED 12" (MINIMUM) ,ABOVE ROOF SURFACE. PIPE MUST ALSO RIM a FOUNDATION DETAIL �, � BE 10' FROM ANY WINDOWS OR OTHER OPENING IN ADJOINING/ADJACENT BUILDINGS $�C 4LE: 111 = 11-011 INSULATE (R-4 MIN.) PIPE IN UNCONDITIONED SPACES i NOTE: -SEAL ALL FOUNDATION OPENINGS = z 3: -INSTALL PIPE AS STRAIGHT E w AS POSSIBLE TO HELP 3 FLOW. ELBOWS ARE ALLOWED, NOTE: EXTERIOR WATERPROOFING m BUT SHOULD BE AVOIDED IF POSSIBLE IS NOT REQUIRED HERE IF CLOSED INSTALL LIVE OUTLET CELL INSULATION SEALS THE SILL INSULATION PER L \ FOUNDATION DETAILS - - - IN ATTIC NEAR WHERE FUTURE PLATE AND TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL FAN MAY BE INSTALLED /-FUTURE FAN AREA -\ / (MINIMUM 24" DIAM. CENTERED ON FOUNDATION THE AXIS OF THE VENT STACK) p p AD, _W/ ABOVE GRADE PROTECTION TO _3" GASTIGHT PVC RADON VENT EXTEND 6 BELOW GRADE _ a- _ GRADE LINE _° _ I I LABEL w ALL FLOORS AND ACCESSIBLE D - ATTICS W/ "RADON REDUCTION SYSTEM" (CONNECTED TO DRAIN TILE) z o ° D SEAL JOINT BETWEEN _ p ° a Q p 4" DIA DRAIN TILE LOOP IN BED - FOUNDATION WALL B SLAB EXTERIOR WATERPROOFING OF GRAVEL (FULL INTERIOR ° D - (o-MIL POLY VAPOR o D o TO TOP OF INTERIOR WALL EDGE PERIMETER OF FOOTINGS) - , a - BARRIER UNDER CONIC. LEADING TO SUMP BASKET SLAB B ABOVE GAS ICI= FOUNDATION DETAIL NOTE: DRAIN TILE TO GO THROUGH ANY ° D - PERMEABLE LAYER INTERIOR FOOTINGS (NOT UNDER) a- ; L a a a a (LAPPED 12 MIN, Q EDGES) II II - �. d ° °. u SCALE. 1 1 O 4 UNIFORM AY OF: LE R LAYER sl[?iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii€€'ii€ .................................... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: p D ,p �._._.._._.._._._ " CLEAN AGGREGATE or 12" SAND (NATIVE OR FILL) MIN. �A TRENCH W/ GRAVEL (AGGREGATE SIZE TO BE 1"4/2") SEALED SUMP PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM / CONNECTED TO DRAIN TILE DETAIL SCALE: 1/2" = V-011 s NOTE: SEE FOUNDATION 2X6 STUDS W/ R-20 (MIN,) CLOSED PLAN FOR FINISHED AND CELL FOAM INSULATION UNFINISHED AREAS / _ �,X (TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER) EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING SIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) HOUSE WRAP (EXTEND DOWN WALL - TO A POINT BELOW THE SILL PLATE) SILL SEAL UNDER 2X6 PRESSURE x a x a a TREATED PLATE \� - D D . `D D - GRADE LINE ° ° ICF FOUNDATION (THICKNESS' 4 HT, PER FDN. PLAN) O D D D — D — D D D D D D WALKOUT FOUNDATION DETAIL SCALE: 1" z 1'—OII YN � FLOOR TRUSS SYSTEM s 8 S INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM (TO ACT AS VAPOR BARRIER) EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING ie HOUSE WRAP (EXTEND DOWN WALL TO A POINT BELOW THE SILL PLATE) < , SIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) S, CLOSED CELL INSUL. 9 RIM s� s !,�" O.S.B. SHEATHING Q RIM RIM DETAIL 6 FRAMING SCALE: I" = 1'-O" OUTSIDE ELEVATION CONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED BRACED WALL PANEL MEETING MINIMUM LENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE Rro02,10,5 _ 01<TENT OF HEADER W/ DOUBLE PORTAL FRAME - (TWO BRACED WALL PANELS) SIDE EXTENT OF HEADER W/ SINGLE PORTAL FRAME ELEVATION (ONE BRACED WALL PANEL) �i Z W BRACED WALL LINE Q $ CONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED W/ WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS V p ' MIN. 3"x11,25" NET HEADER (IF !/2" SPACER IS USED, PLACE ; \\ / ON BACKSIDE OF HEADER) -STEEL HEADER PROHIBITED - HEADER TO JACK -STUD STRAP PER IRC TABLE ` 1 / R602,10.6.4 ON BOTH SIDES OF OPENING OPPOSITE SIDE OF SHEATHING z TASTEN TOP PLATE TO HEADER W/ 2 ROWS 3 OF 16d SINKER NAILS m 3" O,C, (TYPICAL) = 1: �j C ASTEN HEADER TO KING STUD W/ N Q ^ .. (6) 16d SINKER NAILS Q QT4.. } ~ W Z (3 CQ •'Ze--DOUBLE 2X4 (MIN,) FRAMING p = Q w E 3/8°(MIN.) THICKNESS WOOD Q 4 [�S/TRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING OWu-_j �Y _j-J:: X 4 Z W Q = 2 FT. - IS FT, (FINISHED OPENING WIDTH) _ r= Z Q I I lIN, WIDTH OF PANEL PER Q `� Q RC TABLE R602.10.5 O � w Z_ U O m N O 0--PANEL SPLICE EDGES (IF NEEDED) Z - V SHALL OCCUR OVER 6 BE NAILED w Q m V .. A Z O'' MIN, (2) DIAM, TO COMMON BLOCKING WITHIN THE Q T5 Z _j MIDDLE 24" OF THE PORTAL LEG HT, 'I. 0 Q (0 .. ANCHOR BOLTS INSTALLED PER ONE ROW OF 3" O.G. NAILING IS IRC R403,1,6 W/ REQ, IN EA, PANEL EDGE 2"X2"X3/16" PLATE ANCHOR BOLTS .. WASHER (TYPICAL) PER SECTION DOUBLE 2X4 (MIN,) POST (KING t JACK STUD)' R403,1,6 NUMBER OF JACK STUDS PER IRC TABLES ► I POURED CONC, OR - BLOCK 8 (2) BLOCK FOUNDATION b� v BRACED WALL PANEL DETAIL (METHOD CS-1=03 OVER CONCRETE OR MASONRY BLOCK FDN, „C (NOT TO SCALE) . TYPICAL .. PORTAL FRAME CONST, I SEE DETAIL ABOVE FOR COMPLETE FRAMING DETAIL SIDE OUTSIDE ELEVATION ELEVATION WOOD STRUCTURAL NAIL SOLE PLATE PANEL SHEATHING TO E TOP OF BAND OR PER_ TABLE R602,30) NAIL SOLE PLATE RIM JOIST TO JOIST PER IRC TABLE R602,30) -/ -WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING OVER APPROVED BAND OR RIM JOIST APPROVED BAND BRACED WALL PANEL DETAIL (METHOD CS-PF) OR RIM JOIST OVER RAISED WOOD FLOOR - FRAMING ANCHOR OPTION (2) FRAMING ANCHORS APPLIED WHEN PORTAL SHEATHING DOES NOT OVERLAP BAND OR RIM JOIST ACROSS SHEATHING JOINT W/ • A CAPACITY OF 6�0 LBS IN (NOT TO SCALE - FIGURE R602.10.6.4) BOTH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIRECTIONS SEE DETAIL ABOVE FOR COMPLETE FRAMING DETAIL BA I ND OR RIM SHEATHING ro SAOUTSIDE ELEVATION f0 JOIST W/ Sal COMMON SIDE ELEVATION BAILS 3" o,c. TWOOD STRUCTURAL ' fOP AND BOTTOM" PANEL SHEATHING NAIL SOLE PLATE CONTINUOUS OVER BAND NAIL SOLE PLATE TO JOIST PER IRC OR RIM JOIST PER IRC TABLE R602,30) 1 TABLE R602,30U T , - ti- Si" MIN, � WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING - APPROVED BAND OVERLAP OVER APPROVED BAND OR RIM JOIST OR RIM JOIST -CONSTRUCTION PERMIT OFFICES- WAIVER s ONLY TO ACCEPT THIS PLAN IF THE WORD V, ORIGINAL SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED � w 8 8��r� ORIGINAL Q� omz�wOu�z 0 w00J IT IS ,AESO UNLAWFUL FOR THIS PRINT TO BE w01`� ff z -4 u u m j u a- REPRODUCED.UNLESS THE WORD " u z Q Ww fKOd— ORIGINAL SHOWS IN THE COLOR RED tx O O (L w z z U 0 PERMISSION ONLY TO BE GRANTED BY 0 w d 0 Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLG, I d d d d) w w -J�/- 1 /7, U off WWuzd� GARAGE E DETAILS '1'_ �� w - I o° fi S�s �.C� u z —1 3: �d) W z z —PITCH PER ELEVATIONS v � O ROOF TRU3OZO O U (X Q- } Q BLOWN IN INSULATION (R-49 MIN. 3 O 0 W 0 w N U- O 12 HEEL HEIGHT WILL I" AIR CHUTES FULL WIDTH OF EACH X -, VARY W/ DIFFERENT � Ca N Z LU W J W O [Q O TRUSS SPACE F ROOF PITCHES u- U - _ U 4 SHINGLZO @ ll NOTE: IF HEEL IS OVER 9%a", Z ADDITIONAL BLOCKING IS W Q z Z 0 to Z= RIGID WINDWASH BARRIER y _ uL_ REQUIRED a BRACED z F- W ,zQ (Lw W z (K WALL PANEL LOCATIONS > _1 w -1 Q 0 w 3 (L/ w(L(KUzU �fQw - SEAL VAPOR BARRIER ROOF EDGE OVERHANG SIZE TO FRAMING W/ 3ha" 0 PER ELEVATIONS �_ / BEAD OF ACOUSTICAL SEALANT FASCIA W/ 2X6 SUBFASCIA TAPE CEILING VAPOR BARRIER \__INTERIOIR VENTED ALUMINUM SOFFIT TO WALL VAPOR BARRIER e SEAM I(ALL TO BE PERFORATED) GYPSUM BOARD (INTERIOR AIR BARRIER) EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING TRUSS DETAIL (GARAGE) BATT INSULATION 4 MIL POLY VAPOR SCALE: I" = 1'-OII BARRIER W/ JOINTS LAPPED 6" MIN. CIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) HOUSEWRAP LAP ALL JOINTS l(o" MIN,) x XXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING �+ I ,BATT INSULATION I ' I }-` LINTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD Yc� SEAL VAPOR BARRIER �,1 (INTERIOR AIR BARRIER) TO FRAMING W/ 3/a" 4, '`i 4 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER BEAD OF ACOUSTICAL '::>' W/ JOINTS LAPPED 6" MIN. SEALANT = 1SX /IINTERIOPARTITION - Al/ WALL INTERSECTION DETAIL v SCALE: I" = 1'-0 II s� S DLOWN IN INSULATION ,_OOF TRUSS BOTTOM CHORD CIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) HOUSEWRAP LAP ALL JOINT (6" MIN.) =•EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING ,__�2X(o CORNER STUDS w z U U- O= O W U U c� ((X UVU0wz� VLu zL�L OpT) CL OOz (L��O(L U (L U C d BATT INSULATION ^� INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD 5r� (INTERIOR AIR BARRIER) CQ y 4 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER W/ JOINTS LAPPED 6" MIN. �, O ye OUTSIDE CORNER DETAIL 'So ?j SCALE: 1II = 1 -O" �`% L INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD (INTERIOR AIR BARRIER) 0 4 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER W/ JOINTS LAPPED �o" MIN. R-20 (MIN,) BATT INSULATION EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING HOUSE WRAP (EXTEND DOWN WALL -% TO A POINT BELOW THE SILL PLATE) -f -SIDING (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE) - (MATCH EXISTING) p '-SILL SEAL UNDER 2X6 PRESSURE CONIC, FLOOR - 1'p TREATED PLATE GRADE LINE (SEE MANUFACTURERS DETAILS ° FOR INSTALLATION INFO) sv a ° ICF FDN, WALL: WIDTH, HEIGHT, °v ° a FTG. SIZE PER FDN. PLAN 4 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER W/ JOINTS LAPPED (o" MIN, SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH PARTITION TOP PLATES W/ EXPANDING FOAM INSULATION r INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD (INTERIOR AIR BARRIER) SEAL VAPOR BARRIER TO FRAMING W/ Na" 0 BEAD OF ACOUSTICAL SEALANT INTERIOR PARTITION WALL_ lw ATTIC SPACE SCALE: III = 11-0" I I BRACED WALL PANEL DETAIL (METHOD CS-PF) OVER RAISED WOOD FLOOR - OVERLAP OPTION -WHEN PORTAL SHEATHING LAPS OVER BAND OR RIM JOIST A0* (NOT TO SCALE - FIGURE R602,10.6.4) s Y O Q. s� S O� O� m w �� y/ Q o � z � Q Ll LQ q 0 � u 61 bp(�n 6' Q�4Nu cri � cv m N m x N O GARAGE FOUNDATION DETAIL SCALE: III = 1'-0" AN > m LUtL m m Ise U N m Q 0 (Lu ka- W Cri U W O W N W 6► — c(� Q) p/ z ul o z w 11 s� S x O w Y . * ^' SQ. FT. E FLOOR AREAS ARE FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY. W SQ. FT, f AREAS ARE NOT TO BE N USED FOR MARKETING PURPOSES (L © 2023 Distinctive Drafting and Design, LLG ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET NO UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION A& OF & WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT 02005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. LOT SKETCH 6 ill&,584,5°5f 18„J�� 1 -X 0 9 l'0T'9 0, - �K .- WALKOUT ,--� " ' / lJ 35 E OCR 0 ��--g 8 8 07 910�b Pi AR BAR k- 17 x 1918 x 23 DESCR/P RON. Future Lot 9, Block 2, CARLISLE VILLAGE 4TH ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota. Denotes Tree to remain ci Denotes Tree to be removed Denotes Tree Protection Fence Front Yard setback = 15 FT Rear Yard Setback = 10 ft. Side Yard Setback (garage) = 6 ft. Side Yard Setback (house) = 6 ft. Side Yard Setback (corner) = 20 ft. 1�24' 63.1 Scale: 1 20 feet REQUESTED BY. ,I SHADOW CREEK CORPORATION Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 W Phone: 952-937.5150 Pax: 952-937-5822 Drawn by BTW I Dote.' 041,8105 I ✓ob No: 2004 109 1. 01 eo2Los 20041091.01SKF01.dwg CITY OF Mont Co January 29, 2024 Re: Kasper CUP City Project # 2024-04 OFFICE:763-295-2711 FAX:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street Suite 11 Monticello, MN 55362 The Engineering Department has reviewed the plans for the Kasper CUP and offers the following comments: General Comments 1. The minimum required slope in green space is 2%. 2. The maximum slope in a yard is 3:1. (4:1 is preferred when possible for maintenance) 3. Provide elevations in flow line of curb. If elevations work the driveway should slope to the street. 4. Retaining walls 4' or greater will require to be designed by a licensed engineer and have a railing or fence on top. 5. Survey submitted for building permit will need to be signed by a licensed surveyor. The City is not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please contact the Engineering Department with any questions. Sincerely, Ryan Melhouse Assistant City Engineer www.ci.monticeIIo.mn.us City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 21. Consideration to approve Requests for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for a Multi -Commercial Proiect in the B-2, Limited Business District; Request for Preliminary Plat of Big River 445; Request for Simple Subdivision of a Single Parcel with Split -Zoning, B-2, Limited Business District and IBC, Industrial & Business Campus District. Applicant: Division 25, LLC Prepared by: Grittman Consultants — City Planner Reviewed by: Community Development Director, Chief Building and Zoning Official, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Assistant City Engineer ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date: 2/26/24 Approved by: City Administrator ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Simple Subdivision, Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD. Planning Commission also unanimously recommended approval of the rezoning to PUD, which will be considered by the City Council with the Final Plat and Final Stage PUD. Decision 1: Consideration of a metes and bounds Simple Subdivision of the subject property, creating 2 parcels, one of which is proposed for platting as Big River 445. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-19 approving a metes and bounds Simple Subdivision of the subject property (PID 155-011-000171) to create two parcels, based on findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z, as well as those in the resolution specifying approval of a final plat prior to parcel development and acceptance of the subdivision by the Wright County Recorder's Office. Decision 2: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of Big River 445, consisting of 2 development parcels and one outlot, as well as public and private easements, and dedication of right of way for adjoining streets. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-20, approving the preliminary plat of Big River 445, based on the findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. Decision 3: Consideration of a Development Stage PUD City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-21, approving the Development Stage PUD for Lot 1 and 2, Block 1 of Big River 445, based on the findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Extensive, Provided on Application Materials PID: 155-011-000171 Planning Case Number: 2024-05 Request(s): 1. Metes and Bounds Simple Subdivision 2. Preliminary Plat (Big River 445) 3. Rezoning from B-2, Limited Business District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (plat of Big River 445 ) 2. Development Stage PUD, Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 and including other Phase I site improvements Deadline for Decision: March 10, 2024 (60-day deadline) May 9, 2024 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: Regional Commercial Zoning Designation: B-2, Limited Business District Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District Current Site Uses: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Interstate 94 East: ROW, Multi -Family Residential South: Institutional (Monticello Schools) West: Vacant Commercial Project Description: The subject site is located between Chelsea Road and I-94, west of Fenning Avenue (County Road 18). The site is approximately 26.3 acres of land which is presently undeveloped. The full parcel is split -zoned, with the easterly portion zoned IBC (Industrial Business Campus) and the westerly portion zoned B-2, Limited City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Business; the existing zoning follows County section lines. The area of the proposed preliminary plat and PUD is fully within the area zoned B-2 at present. The applicant proposes to acquire the site and develop the subject site in phases. The initial request is to subdivide the easterly 10.6 acres nearest to Fenning Avenue through simple subdivision, which would then be platted to accommodate commercial development. As noted above, the site is guided by the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan for Regional Commercial land use, which correlates to the B-4, Regional Business zoning district — accommodating a broad array of commercial land uses. The developer is seeking to plat the 10.6-acre development area and has requested Development Stage PUD approval for the first phase of the project. The first phase consists of a quick -service restaurant on the westerly Lot 2, and a coffee shop on the easterly Lot 1, together with associated internal street and utility improvements for the full 10.6-acre plat area. Future lots would be platted from the proposed outlots for other commercial development. A future application for Development Stage PUD and amendment to the PUD will also be required as each future parcel is proposed for development. The project would be accessed via a looped private street, which will be fully constructed with the first phase of development. The easterly access would abut the west line of Lot 2, and then create a "T" intersection — one leg extending to the east for access to both Lots 1 and 2, and the other leg extending to the west, returning to Chelsea Road at the west boundary of the current 10.6-acre development area. The project was initially presented at a Concept PUD review. The proposed land uses and general layout are generally consistent with that Concept PUD plan, although specifics have been modified as the developer seeks to comply with the direction given at Concept level, and address details with additional civil data. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 ANALYSIS: Land Use The City's Land Use Plan, as included in the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan (Comprehensive Plan), directs "Regional Commercial" use of the subject site. The "Regional Commercial" designation encourages a wide range of commercial business uses serving both the local area and regional highway traffic. The proposed and future uses are expected to be consistent with the land use designation for regional commercial activity. The applicants propose to utilize Planned Unit Development zoning and development flexibility to accommodate their proposed site configuration and uses as described below. PUD Zoning The project requires a planned unit development (PUD), accomplished by establishment of a PUD Zoning District applicable to the subject site. In this case, a PUD is being requested to accommodate the following: a. Development parcels that do not have direct frontage on a public street, but rather rely on access across a common private street managed by a common interest entity, but which would be designed to public street standards. b. Flexibility in setback requirements from the private street based on, and controlled by, the planned design of the project. c. Shared access and parking areas for adjoining commercial uses. d. Common signage and flexibility in sign size and on -site or off -site sign locations. As with any PUD proposal, applicants can request flexibility, with the expectation that the project achieves the City's land use goals despite departure from standard zoning standards. Simple Subdivision The applicant's project is proposed for the easterly 10.6 acres of a larger 28.3-acre parcel (PID 155-011-000171). The concept review meeting on this project illustrated a future expansion onto the remaining 17.7 acres. That continues to be a longer -term objective. However, the initial platting and development is planned for the 10.6 acres now under consideration. To facilitate the plat and other development approvals, the applicants are seeking approval of a subdivision of that larger parcel. The proposed subdivision would be via a "metes and bounds" legal description that creates a new property line boundary between the westerly future site, and the easterly development proposal area. These subdivisions are often called "simple" subdivisions, as the process and documentation requirements are not as extensive as a full plat. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 The Subdivision Ordinance encourages most subdivisions to be by platting, although certain subdivisions are identified as exceptions from the plat requirement. One of those is as follows: Section 153.07 (A) (1) A division which results in commercial or industrial parcels having an area of five acres or more with frontage on a public right-of- way measuring 300 feet or more and which does not result in the division of the parcel into two or more lots, any one of which is less than five acres in area or 300 feet in width and which does not necessitate the dedication of a public right- of- way. Such division shall not cause any structure on the lot to be in violation of the zoning ordinance or said new portions of lots to be in violation of city ordinance. Under this exception clause, platting is waived by ordinance, and the subdivider is required to submit a survey of the property with a new legal description. The applicant submitted such a survey and legal description. The proposed parcels are approximately 10.6 and 17.7 acres in area, and each of these two has significantly more than the minimum 300 feet of frontage along Chelsea Road. Public right of way is not technically required, since the City already has easements in place, and the plats of each parcel will accommodate any other right of way necessary. There are no structures that would create violations of any of the new lots. Existing billboards are structures, but do not impact the compliance of any of the parcels in the subdivision. The simple subdivision is compliant with City ordinance. A recommendation of approval would be conditioned on platting of the subsequent parcels prior to development. Preliminary Plat Lots and Access. As noted, the first phase of the proposed plat will create two development parcels from the proposed 10.6-acre parcel, leaving the remaining acreage in an outlot pending the timing of development pressure for those future parcels. The Preliminary Plat envisions a total of 8 parcels, three of which adjoin the 1-94 right of way. All parcels will rely on the internal private street for their direct access; none of the parcels will directly access Chelsea Road. The internal street, including both access points to Chelsea Road, are to be constructed with the first phase of the project, per the applicant's narrative. The parcels range in size from just under 28,000 square feet (.64 acres) to just over 80,500 square feet (1.85 acres). The B-4 zoning district does not require a lot area minimum/maximum and does not specify a lot width minimum. To accommodate the future subdivision of Outlot A into developable lots and blocks per the Preliminary Plat, the applicant/developer is required to submit a final plat at the time of each proposed subdivision. The final plat for this initial first phase and future phases will be reviewed by the City Council, provided it is generally consistent with the preliminary plat. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 The plat also completes dedication of right of way for Chelsea Road to create a right of way width of 80 feet, widening as it approaches the intersection with Fenning Avenue to accommodate multiple lane options. The existing Chelsea Road is partly on right of way and partly on road easement. The plat reconciles the variable road status in this area. Further right of way dedication is subject to resolution of the City Engineer's review comments. An existing pathway runs along the north side of Chelsea Road —the pathway will be mostly within the right of way, but veers onto the development property. That area is covered by a trail easement. The plat further dedicates an additional 40 feet of right of way along Fenning Avenue. This dedication incorporates the existing pathway along the west side of Fenning. No wetlands exist within the development and preliminary plat area. Grading, Drainage and Utilities. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities are subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. The preliminary plat's accompanying civil plans illustrate shared stormwater facilities. The preliminary plat envisions two areas of stormwater infiltration — the largest of which is located at the corner of Chelsea and Fenning. The infiltration ponding is a private improvement supporting the development plan — other ponding requirements are being addressed through off -site regional ponds. The City Engineer should comment on whether the infiltration areas should be covered by a Drainage and Utility easement. A drainage and utility easement will be provided over the private road to accommodate the municipal water and sewer lines, which will be extended to serve the individual development parcels. Other easements as directed by the City Engineer are shown on the plat and as may be required by the Engineer's comments. Public Streets and Circulation. The applicant prepared a traffic memo, which has been reviewed by the City Engineer's office. Issues related to additional right-of-way requirements, access and circulation are noted in the comment letter provided by the City Engineer, including those related to striping along Chelsea Road. As this plat is adjacent to MnDOT and Wright County rights -of -way, the plat was reviewed by both agencies. Comment letters from both entities are included with this report. Preliminary plat approval is subject to the resolution of comments of both Wright County and MnDOT. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Development Stage PUD The first phase of development consists of Lots 1 and 2, with the remaining area subject to future Development Stage PUD reviews and final platting. This first phase includes a quick - service restaurant on Lot 2, and a coffee shop on Lot 1. Both facilities will include drive -through services. Drive -Through Design. The proposed quick -service restaurant includes a drive -through facility accessed via a right turn into the site immediately adjacent to the private street entrance. The drive -through lane provides room for approximately eight stacking spaces from the entrance to the pick-up window. For quick service restaurants, the zoning ordinance requires at least this many such stacking spaces. One aspect of this design, however, is the lack of a menu and/or order board. The applicant confirmed that the design is intended to provide drive -through service for pre -ordered pick up only. The identified tenant is Chipotle, which utilizes a model with this design. As a pick-up lane only, the stacking design should be adequate. The design also shows an "escape" or "bypass" lane for vehicles which decide not to re-enter the parking area without picking up orders at the window. Drive -through traffic exits into the shared parking area south of the building. For the proposed coffee facility, the site plan illustrates up to 14 stacking spaces which enter the dedicated drive -through lane at the south end of the parking lot and circulates in a single lane to the menu/order board area, then to the pick-up window on the north side of the building. This design meets the City's typical requirements for drive -through stacking, and even with additional overflow, no conflicts with circulation or for the street traffic are foreseen. Site Plan & Building Elements. The following site and building aspects of the project apply specifically to the first phase of the project. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures for the two proposed buildings are shown on the site plans as separate services. The Chipotle trash enclosure is shown north of the building, with access from the internal parking area near the entrance. The coffee shop's trash enclosure is located within the shared parking field at the south end of the site, near the Chelsea Road exposure and remote from the building. A shared trash enclosure area would be superior to either of these two locations, one which can be accessed by service vehicles, but which lessens the prominence of either of these two designs. Staff encourages a single common enclosure straddling the internal parking area in the middle of the site that can serve both facilities. The trash enclosure directly adjacent to Chelsea City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Road is required to be relocated closer to the building and away from the Chelsea Road frontage as a condition of approval. Lighting. The applicant provided a lighting plan that shows all light intensity to be at or below the maximum perimeter light level of 1.0 footcandles at the property line in commercial areas. Staff notes that the maximum height of pole lighting is 25 feet —this dimension is specified on the plans. All lighting is to be hooded and directed downward to avoid glare from adjoining roads or property. Because the project is served by private streets, street lighting is also included as a private improvement. This will be coordinated with any public street lighting, particularly at intersection points along Chelsea Road, which is noted in the City Engineer's memo. All lighting will be consistent with City Code requirements. Building Materials. The plans show building materials and exterior architecture for each of the two first -phase buildings. The Chipotle consists of a combination of brick and painted parapet wall, with a small "tower" area over the drive - through pick-up window. The primary difference between the two options consists of signage, in which Option 1 includes signage only on two faces of the building — east toward Fenning, and south toward Chelsea; Option 2 shows wall signage on all four faces. As the design of the building is quite plain, staff believes that the additional sign panels provide a modest increase in building interest, and would encourage Option 2, if no other building design enhancements are proposed. For the coffee shop (Starbucks) building, the architectural drawings show a combination of brick, Drivit (sometimes called "EIFS"), and painted wood. The plan shows wall identification logo signage on the north and south facades, as well as a sign panel on the west wall facing the internal parking area. No other fagade interest is shown on the east wall facing Fenning. This reinforces a "back wall" aspect of the design. Staff recommends some aspect of the building design that dresses this exposure up as this is the most prominent portion of the site — both this phase, and for the project overall. The coffee shop site includes a covered open patio space on the south side of the building toward Chelsea, also seen from Fenning. Adding color or even signage to this covered area could enhance the east view of the project area — especially as such areas are for seasonal use only and landscaping on the easterly edge is limited. This could also be accomplished with decorative lighting or similar enhancements. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Off -Street Parking. According to the Zoning Ordinance, quick service restaurants must provide parking based on the floor area of the kitchen, seating, and service areas, exclusive of non -productive space such as storage, mechanical, restroom, and refrigerator spaces. The plans do not detail the floor plans but indicate a total of approximately 4,800 square feet of floor area for the two structures. The shared parking lot provides 51 parking spaces in total, exclusive of the drive -through stacking, a ratio of one parking space per approximately 95 square feet of gross floor area. It would be expected that for similar businesses, nearly 25% of the floor area is dedicated to non- productive space, meaning that the required parking for similar facilities would be approximately one parking space per approximately 70 square feet. The PUD use accommodates the ability for the two sites to share parking. For the two uses, the peak usage times will differ, with the coffee shop use dominated by morning peak times, and the restaurant dominated by mid -day and later peaks. A portion of the shared parking will reduce overall demand. The parking supply will be more than adequate to serve both uses, based on all factors. Shared parking to reduce overall impervious on site is viewed as enhancement for the PUD. Pedestrian Circulation. The submitted site plan calls for an internal sidewalk system that supplements the existing public pathways along Fenning Avenue and Chelsea Road. The internal system follows the south side of the private street, connecting the two proposed buildings and connecting to the public system in three places: once at each of the two street connections to Chelsea Road, and a third connection to the Fenning Avenue pathway. It appears that all connections will be a part of the first phase of construction, and this is a condition of approval. Beyond this phase, the internal sidewalk is shown conceptually to serve two of the lots north of the private street (Lots 7 and 8) but does not extend to Lot 6. Staff recommends that this connection is made with that phase of development and Development Stage PUD consideration, even though the use is projected to be an auto service use — employees or others may still utilize the sidewalk system, and this would be an important PUD amenity supporting non -vehicular traffic and travel into and through the project area. Landscaping and Buffering. The applicant incorporated a landscaping plan with plantings that meet both the type and quantities required by the zoning ordinance. An extensive buffering planting is shown along the north side of Chelsea Road, consistent with the requirements for buffers between commercial and institutional uses. Staff notes that the specific plant selections in the shrub and perennial areas are common, although not especially distinctive for commercial landscapes. The tree selections show more variety and interest. All are compliant with code requirements. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Signage. The applicant's narrative describes the proposed PUD signage, both for the intended buildings and overall site. Overall, the proposed sign plan is viewed as an area of enhanced PUD design. In regard to wall signage, the City's code allows signage to be placed on all four building walls, which the applicant notes is consistent with their request. The applicant also requests that the internal private street be considered frontage when evaluating the code's standards that building signage not exceed a maximum of 15% of the facades fronting not more the two streets. Staff believe this to be an acceptable PUD accommodation, particularly to avoid "back -wall" type design for buildings and limit free-standing signs on -site. The application narrative details the design for consolidated free-standing site signage. The narrative specifies 9'.6" high monument signage, totaling no more than 60 square feet of sign face. These signs may in some cases be shared by users. This is a PUD enhancement over the individual pylon signs as allowed by the Freeway Bonus District code. The PUD is also proposed to include two larger free- standing signs of a monument style. The signs will be 22' in height and 135 square feet of sign area. These signs will include space for all eight lot users. One of the consolidated free-standing signs will be located along Fenning Avenue and one along the frontage of Interstage 94. SiteAmenities. The site plan overall creates a typical commercial service development and provides for a reasonable expansion to the west as anticipated by the applicant's concept plan. The project is anticipated to include a number of commercial users that capitalize on both local market and inter -regional traffic generated by the proximity of interstate access. The use of PUD design accommodates the flexibility in site planning, shared parking and access, signage and other identification, and overall project density. The expectation with any PUD is additional project amenities that justify the departure from the City's general zoning regulations. In this case, the proposed site design accommodates a variety of commercial uses, maximizing the area and dimensions of the property. In addition, the shared signage and parking, as well as coordinated access from Chelsea Road are viewed as positive aspects of the PUD. To further support the use of PUD, staff suggest that the project would benefit from enhancement to green space areas that creates space for travelers and residents alike to share outdoor rest, dog walking, and similar amenities that such customers are likely to seek. There appears to be an opportunity for such an area near the Fenning Avenue access points, along Chelsea Road and potentially near Chelsea Road — the applicant would need to design that space into their project. These areas can be both useful, and attractive, and would provide a significant improvement toward justifying PUD flexibility in this project. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Budget Impact: The applicant submitted the required fees and escrows associated with the review and public notice for the applications. The escrow will be used to cover the review costs of consulting staff. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff involved with the review of the application members of the Development Services and Engineering Departments, as well as the consulting planner and engineer. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: This project is consistent with the Monticello 2040 Future Land Use Plan map, which guides the area for regional commercial uses. The Monticello 2040 Plan includes a goal for "Successful Commercial Corridors", citing a policy for Regional Commercial Uses as follows: "Maintain land use designations for regional commercial land uses to attract shoppers from the larger region and motorists along Interstate 94. Regional land uses include large format general merchandise retailers, entertainment uses, and themed or destination restaurants and should be located near Interstate Interchanges and along regional transportation routes." The nature of this development as a hub for commercial retail users is consistent with this policy. The proposed PUD also includes enhanced landscaping, internal and external pathway connections, and signage plan that will benefit this higher visibility entry point into the community, also noted in the 2040 "Successful Commercial Corridors" goal section. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed the applications for this development on February 6, 2024, holding a public hearing on the preliminary plat, rezoning, and development stage PUD requests. The Commission asked staff to provide an overview on the PUD request in terms of both enhancement and flexibility. Staff explained that the PUD is being used to allow for an internal street design rather than each lot gaining access from Chelsea Road, as well as some shared parking. This flexibility is also an area of enhancement as it manages access points to Chelsea Road. In addition, the City is providing some flexibility in the wall sign package allowances, but an enhancement in consolidated free-standing signage throughout the project area. The proposed landscaping plan is an enhancement over base code requirements. The Commission noted that they support staff's condition on relocation of the coffee shop trash enclosure, suggesting that moving the enclosure closer to the building is a benefit to employees accessing the structure. The Commission commented that the site includes a number of pathways or sidewalks for walkability, but that the developer should consider making a connection into the site nearer the intersection of Fenning and Chelsea, as it is likely that users will seek to make that cut -through into the site sooner. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Randy Rauwerdink, representing Big River/Venture Pass as developers, addressed the Commission, making themselves available for comment. He noted that their goal is to begin site grading in May of 2024. The Commission inquired whether the app-based drive -through configuration or the quick - serve restaurant has been demonstrated in other locations. The applicant confirmed it is not an unusual configuration and has been used in other locations. Sarah Sundine, 5919 Badger Street, Monticello, commented on the potential for site traffic. She explained her personal experience as an employee at UMC and with having a student at the high school, she is concerned about congestion in the area. Staff noted that the applicant had provided a traffic analysis memo and that the City Engineer's office had provided comments on the recommendations for the corridor. It was also mentioned by both staff and Commission that the functional classification of the adjacent Chelsea Road and Fenning Avenue are such that the streets are designed for the proposed volume of traffic, although there will be peak hour traffic demands. The change in the access and traffic flow out of the high school was noted. Regarding a question on access spacing from the Commission, staff explained that the engineers are satisfied with the proposed access points given the turning movements into the area and current lane configuration. In regard to any need for a right turn lane into the site along Chelea, that need will be evaluated with future phases. Signal timing was also noted by the Commission as a future potential adjustment to manage traffic. The Commission indicated that future phases should also consider any need for crosswalks along the Chelsea frontage. No other public was present to address the Commission during the hearing. In their discussion, the Commission commented that the development site has high exposure to primary roadways in direct proximity. The Commission stated that the area is clearly a regional commercial site accommodating the proposed types of users, with the proposal balancing street visibility with access, including multi -modal considerations. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of all applications presented. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Planning Staff recommends approval of the Simple Subdivision, Rezoning to PUD, Preliminary Plat, and Development Stage PUD for Big River 445 Planned Unit Development (Phase 1), with the conditions noted in Exhibit Z for the plat and development stage PUD, and as referenced in the accompanying resolutions. The project is consistent with the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan and provides an appropriate and expected level of commercial activity in an area specifically intended for such uses. In City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 addition, the project offers PUD enhancements in its reduction of overall impervious surface through shared facilities, enhanced landscaping, and shared signage. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2024-19, Approving Simple Subdivision B. Resolution 2024-20, Approving Preliminary Plat of Big River 445 C. Resolution 2024-21, Approving Development Stage PUD of Big River 445 D. Resolution PC-2024-04, Simple Subdivision E. Resolution PC-2024-05, Preliminary Plat of Big River 445 F. Resolution PC-2024-06, Rezoning to PUD G. Resolution PC-2024-07, Development Stage PUD of Big River 445 H. Ordinance No. 8XX I. Aerial Image J. Applicant Narrative K. Development Stage PUD Plans, dated January 8, 2024, including: a. Certificate of Survey b. Simple Subdivision c. Preliminary Plat d. Draft Final Plat e. Existing Conditions and Removals Plan f. Site Plan g. Utility Plan h. Grading & Drainage Plan i. Erosion Control Plan j. SWPPP Narrative k. Landscape Plan I. Photometric L. Proposed Coffee Shop Building Elevations M. Quick Service Restaurant Building Elevation — Option 1 & Option 2 N. Draft Traffic Impact Study, dated August 28, 2023 O. City Engineer's Letter, dated January 29, 2024 a. Development Stage PUD Plans with WSB Comments b. Draft Traffic Impact Study with WSB Comments P. Wright County Preliminary Plat Review Letter, dated January 23, 2024 Q. MnDOT Preliminary Plat Review Letter, dated January 29, 2024 R. Stormwater Management Report S. Geotechnical Exploration Report T. Wetland Determination Memo & Wetland Notice of Decision City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 U. V. W. Z. 1. W 3 2 5 L VA 91 RI Monticello 2040 Land Use Plan Monticello Official Zoning Map Concept Stage Submission and Minutes Conditions of Approval, Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD -*:I:IH. IttJ Conditions of Approval Big River 445 Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD Development stage PUD and amendment to the PUD shall be required for remaining proposed development parcels within Outlot A of the plat, as they may be configured at the time of application for final plat. Approval of the rezoning to planned unit development is conditioned on the approval of the final plat of Big River 445. Consolidated site and building signage shall be as specified in the application package for the Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat of Big River 445 dated January 8, 2024. Building enhancements for Lots 1 and 2 as noted in the staff report of February 6, 2024 are incorporated into final development plans. The trash enclosure on Lot 1, Block 1 shall be relocated further from the Chelsea Road street frontage, and all trash enclosure areas shall be located and screened to de- emphasize their visual impacts on the site as viewed from surrounding public areas. Sidewalk to the proposed Lot 7 shall be provided at the time of Development Stage PUD for this phase. Sidewalk and other improvements for proposed Lots 6 and 7 shall be provided at the time of platting and Development Stage PUD for those parcels. The full private street, sidewalk, and utility development serving Lots 1 and 2 of the subject phases, as well as all parcels abutting Chelsea Road, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. Public improvements, including any of those in the Chelsea Road or Fenning Avenue rights of way, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 10. As a part of Final PUD approval, an amended preliminary plan set shall be developed illustrating conceptual locations for site amenities, including seating, walking, and rest areas for patrons of the project which shall be subject to ongoing review and refinement as future phases are developed, with timing of construction to be determined. 11. An amended plan set showing additional screening or visual enhancement shall be provided as a part of any Final Stage PUD application for the outdoor patio area proposed for Lot 1, Block 1, particularly in those areas facing Fenning Avenue. 12. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared access, use and maintenance of the private road and site signage within the planned unit development, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. 13. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared parking between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of the plat, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. 14. Execution of a stormwater maintenance agreement providing for common and shared use of the proposed stormwater maintenance facilities, including those public easements required by the City Engineer. 15. Execution and recording of a development governing the plat in accordance with the standard requirements of the City Ordinance and the additional requirements noted in the report. 16. Execution of an encroachment agreement for drive aisles or parking in public drainage and utility easement areas. (Added condition) 17. Compliance with the terms and comments of the City's Engineering staff letter and plan sheet review and traffic memo review comments dated January 29, 2024. 18. Compliance with the comments of the Wright County Highway Engineer's Department and the comments of MnDOT. 19. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-19 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION CREATING A DEVELOPMENT PARCEL FOR BIG RIVER 445 WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a preliminary plat of a parcel of currently vacant land; and WHEREAS, the subject property to be platted is a 10.6 acre portion of a larger unplatted property; and WHEREAS, the subject 10.6 acre portion is subject to a concurrent preliminary plat, separate from the larger parcel; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat would consist of development opportunity for a multiple - building commercial retail center as an allowed use in the proposed Big River 445 Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the plat will create a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities; and WHEREAS, as a result of the concurrent plat, the proposed subdivision creating the 10.6 acre parcel need not provide separate dedications of public land or uses; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the appropriate PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Regional Commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the applications for the subdivision and preliminary plat pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-19 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 6th, 2024 on the concurrent applications and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed subdivision creating a development parcel for the plat of Big River 445; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments of the Planning Commission, the public, and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the approval: 1. As a property which has been designated for regional commercial uses, neither the proposed subdivision, nor the concurrent plat, are anticipated to negatively impact surrounding properties. 2. Approval of the subdivision and associated plat will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. 3. The impacts of the proposed improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed concurrent plat accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure, and as a result, no such improvements are necessary as a part of the subdivision separate from the platting process. 5. The proposed concurrent plat accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area and as a result, no such improvements are necessary as a part of the subdivision separate from the platting process. 6. The proposed access and development details are a component of the concurrent plat and PUD approvals, and are consistent with the applicable land use policies and ordinances, including policies of both MnDOT and Wright County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Monticello City Council approves the proposed subdivision creating a 10.6 acre parcel CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-19 to be platted as Big River 445, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report of February 26, 2024, and as follows: 1. Approval of the final plat of Big River 445 and subsequent plats as required for future parcel development. 2. Acceptance of the subdivision by the Wright County Recorder's Office ADOPTED this 26t" day of February, 2024 by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL 0 ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-20 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BIG RIVER 445 WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a preliminary plat of a parcel of currently vacant land; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat would consist of development opportunity for a multiple - lot and building commercial retail center as an allowed use in the proposed Big River 445 Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to a simple subdivision creating the subject property for platting; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities, subject to the recommendations and comments of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the platted parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the appropriate PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Regional Commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat shows up to 8 development parcels, and a private street serving the proposed PUD project, as well as other improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the plat pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 6t", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed preliminary plat of Big River 445; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-20 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments of the Planning Commission, the public, and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the approval of the preliminary plat: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed PUD accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations and are consistent with the applicable land use policies and ordinances, including policies of both MnDOT and Wright County. 7. As a property which has been designated for such regional commercial uses for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Monticello City Council approves the proposed Preliminary Plat for Big River 445, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: Development stage PUD and amendment to the PUD shall be required for remaining proposed development parcels within Outlot A of the plat, as they may be configured at the time of application for final plat. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-20 2. Approval of the rezoning to planned unit development is conditioned on the approval of the final plat of Big River 445. 3. Consolidated site and building signage shall be as specified in the application package for the Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat of Big River 445 dated January 8, 2024. 4. Building enhancements for Lots 1 and 2 as noted in the staff report of February 6, 2024 are incorporated into final development plans. 5. The trash enclosure on Lot 1, Block 1 shall be relocated further from the Chelsea Road street frontage, and all trash enclosure areas shall be located and screened to de- emphasize their visual impacts on the site as viewed from surrounding public areas. 6. Sidewalk to the proposed Lot 7 shall be provided at the time of Development Stage PUD for this phase. 7. Sidewalk and other improvements for proposed Lots 6 and 7 shall be provided at the time of platting and Development Stage PUD for those parcels. 8. The full private street, sidewalk, and utility development serving Lots 1 and 2 of the subject phases, as well as all parcels abutting Chelsea Road, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. 9. Public improvements, including any of those in the Chelsea Road or Fenning Avenue rights of way, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. 10. As a part of Final PUD approval, an amended preliminary plan set shall be developed illustrating conceptual locations for site amenities, including seating, walking, and rest areas for patrons of the project which shall be subject to ongoing review and refinement as future phases are developed, with timing of construction to be determined. 11. An amended plan set showing additional screening or visual enhancement shall be provided as a part of any Final Stage PUD application for the outdoor patio area proposed for Lot 1, Block 1, particularly in those areas facing Fenning Avenue. 12. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared access, use and maintenance of the private road and site signage within the planned unit development, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. 13. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared parking between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of the plat, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-20 14. Execution of a stormwater maintenance agreement providing for common and shared use of the proposed stormwater maintenance facilities, including those public easements required by the City Engineer. 15. Execution and recording of a development governing the plat in accordance with the standard requirements of the City Ordinance and the additional requirements noted in the report. 16. Execution of an encroachment agreement for drive aisles or parking in public drainage and utility easement areas. 17. Compliance with the terms and comments of the City's Engineering staff letter and plan sheet review and traffic memo review comments dated January 29, 2024. 18. Compliance with the comments of the Wright County Highway Engineer's Department and the comments of MnDOT. 19. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2611 day of February, 2024 by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL la ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21 A RESOLUTION OF APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD FOR BIG RIVER 445 — PHASE 1 WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Development Stage Planned Unit Development approval for a portion of a multi -phased commercial project, currently vacant land, to be platted as Lots 1 and 2, as well as Outlot A, of the Big River 445 plat; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD would consist of development opportunity for a multiple - building commercial retail center as an allowed use in the proposed Big River 445 Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to requests for simple subdivision creating the subject property for platting, a preliminary plat for the proposed project, and an amendment to the City's PUD zoning ordinance and rezoning to Big River 445 PUD District; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD, subject to the requirements of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the appropriate PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Regional Commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Development Stage PUD addresses Phase 1 improvements serving the project, as well as site and architectural improvements on Lots 1 and 2 of the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PUD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 61h, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the Development Stage PUD for Big River 445 — Phase 1; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments of the Planning Commission, the public, and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the approval for Development Stage PUD: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed PUD accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations and are consistent with the applicable land use policies and ordinances, including policies of both MnDOT and Wright County. 7. As a property which has been designated for such regional commercial uses for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Monticello City Council approves the Development Stage PUD for Phase 1 of Big River 445, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: Development stage PUD and amendment to the PUD shall be required for remaining proposed development parcels within Outlot A of the plat, as they may be configured at the time of application for final plat. Approval of the rezoning to planned unit development is conditioned on the approval of the final plat of Big River 445. 3. Consolidated site and building signage shall be as specified in the application package for the Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat of Big River 445 dated January 8, 2024. 4. Building enhancements for Lots 1 and 2 as noted in the staff report of February 6, 2024 are incorporated into final development plans. 5. The trash enclosure on Lot 1, Block 1 shall be relocated further from the Chelsea Road street frontage, and all trash enclosure areas shall be located and screened to de- emphasize their visual impacts on the site as viewed from surrounding public areas. 6. Sidewalk to the proposed Lot 7 shall be provided at the time of Development Stage PUD for this phase. 7. Sidewalk and other improvements for proposed Lots 6 and 7 shall be provided at the time of platting and Development Stage PUD for those parcels. 8. The full private street, sidewalk, and utility development serving Lots 1 and 2 of the subject phases, as well as all parcels abutting Chelsea Road, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. 9. Public improvements, including any of those in the Chelsea Road or Fenning Avenue rights of way, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. 10. As a part of Final PUD approval, an amended preliminary plan set shall be developed illustrating conceptual locations for site amenities, including seating, walking, and rest areas for patrons of the project which shall be subject to ongoing review and refinement as future phases are developed, with timing of construction to be determined. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21 11. An amended plan set showing additional screening or visual enhancement shall be provided as a part of any Final Stage PUD application for the outdoor patio area proposed for Lot 1, Block 1, particularly in those areas facing Fenning Avenue. 12. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared access, use and maintenance of the private road and site signage within the planned unit development, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. 13. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared parking between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of the plat, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. 14. Execution of a stormwater maintenance agreement providing for common and shared use of the proposed stormwater maintenance facilities, including those public easements required by the City Engineer. 15. Execution and recording of a development governing the plat in accordance with the standard requirements of the City Ordinance and the additional requirements noted in the report. 16. Execution of an encroachment agreement for drive aisles or parking in public drainage and utility easement areas. 17. Compliance with the terms and comments of the City's Engineering staff letter and plan sheet review and traffic memo review comments dated January 29, 2024. 18. Compliance with the comments of the Wright County Highway Engineer's Department and the comments of MnDOT. 19. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 26th day of February, 2024 by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL 0 Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21 ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION CREATING A DEVELOPMENT PARCEL FOR BIG RIVER 445 WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a preliminary plat of a parcel of currently vacant land; and WHEREAS, the subject property to be platted is a 10.6 acre portion of a larger unplatted property; and WHEREAS, the subject 10.6 acre portion is subject to a concurrent preliminary plat, separate from the larger parcel; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat would consist of development opportunity for a multiple -building commercial retail center as an allowed use in the proposed Big River 445 Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the plat will create a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities; and WHEREAS, as a result of the concurrent plat, the proposed subdivision creating the 10.6 acre parcel need not provide separate dedications of public land or uses; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the appropriate PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Regional Commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the applications for the subdivision and preliminary plat pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-04 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 6t", 2024 on the concurrent applications and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. As a property which has been designated for regional commercial uses, neither the proposed subdivision, nor the concurrent plat, are anticipated to negatively impact surrounding properties. 2. Approval of the subdivision and associated plat will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. 3. The impacts of the proposed improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed concurrent plat accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure, and as a result, no such improvements are necessary as a part of the subdivision separate from the platting process. 5. The proposed concurrent plat accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area and as a result, no such improvements are necessary as a part of the subdivision separate from the platting process. 6. The proposed access and development details are a component of the concurrent plat and PUD approvals, and are consistent with the applicable land use policies and ordinances, including policies of both MnDOT and Wright County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the proposed subdivision created a 10.6 acre parcel to be platted as Big River 445 be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report of February 6, 2024, and as follows: 1. Approval of the final plat of Big River 445 and subsequent plats as required for future parcel development. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-04 2. Acceptance of the subdivision by the Wright County Recorder's Office ADOPTED this 6t" day of February, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: An€ By: / Andrew Tapper, Vice -Chair unity Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BIG RIVER 445 WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a preliminary plat of a parcel of currently vacant land; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat would consist of development opportunity for a multiple -lot and building commercial retail center as an allowed use in the proposed Big River 445 Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to a simple subdivision creating the subject property for platting; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities, subject to the recommendations and comments of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the platted parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the appropriate PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Regional Commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat shows up to 8 development parcels, and a private street serving the proposed PUD project, as well as other improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the plat pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 61", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-05 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed PUD accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations and are consistent with the applicable land use policies and ordinances, including policies of both MnDOT and Wright County. 7. As a property which has been designated for such regional commercial uses for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the proposed Preliminary Plat for Big River 445 be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. Development stage PUD and amendment to the PUD shall be required for remaining proposed development parcels within Outlot A of the plat, as they may be configured at the time of application for final plat. 2. Approval of the rezoning to planned unit development is conditioned on the approval of the final plat of Big River 445. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-05 3. Consolidated site and building signage shall be as specified in the application package for the Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat of Big River 445 dated January 8, 2024. 4. Building enhancements for Lots 1 and 2 as noted in the staff report of February 61 2024 are incorporated into final development plans. 5. The trash enclosure on Lot 1, Block 1 shall be relocated further from the Chelsea Road street frontage, and all trash enclosure areas shall be located and screened to de-emphasize their visual impacts on the site as viewed from surrounding public areas. 6. Sidewalk to the proposed Lot 7 shall be provided at the time of Development Stage PUD for this phase. 7. Sidewalk and other improvements for proposed Lots 6 and 7 shall be provided at the time of platting and Development Stage PUD for those parcels. 8. The full private street, sidewalk, and utility development serving Lots 1 and 2 of the subject phases, as well as all parcels abutting Chelsea Road, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. 9. Public improvements, including any of those in the Chelsea Road or Fenning Avenue rights of way, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. 10. As a part of Final PUD approval, an amended preliminary plan set shall be developed illustrating conceptual locations for site amenities, including seating, walking, and rest areas for patrons of the project which shall be subject to ongoing review and refinement as future phases are developed, with timing of construction to be determined. 11. An amended plan set showing additional screening or visual enhancement shall be provided as a part of any Final Stage PUD application for the outdoor patio area proposed for Lot 1, Block 1, particularly in those areas facing Fenning Avenue. 12. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared access, use and maintenance of the private road and site signage within the planned unit development, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-05 13. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared parking between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of the plat, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. 14. Execution of a stormwater maintenance agreement providing for common and shared use of the proposed stormwater maintenance facilities, including those public easements required by the City Engineer. 15. Execution and recording of a development governing the plat in accordance with the standard requirements of the City Ordinance and the additional requirements noted in the report. 16. Compliance with the terms and comments of the City's Engineering staff letter and plan sheet review and traffic memo review comments dated January 29, 2024. 17. Compliance with the comments of the Wright County Highway Engineer's Department and the comments of MnDOT. 18. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 6t" day of February, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION IN Angela Schu CZ By. �� Andrew Tapper, i' e-Chair C mmunity Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AMENDING SECTION 153 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CREATING THE BIG RIVER 445 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AND REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO BIG RIVER 445 PUD DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a multi -phased Planned Unit Development for a commercial project, currently vacant land, to be platted as Lots 1 and 2, as well as Outlot A, of the concurrent request for the Big River 445 plat; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD District would create the uses and standards applicable to all development in the Big River PUD District, to consist of a multiple -lot and building commercial retail center as an allowed use in the proposed Big River 445 Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to requests for simple subdivision creating the subject property for platting, a preliminary plat for the proposed project, and a Development Stage PUD approval for Lots 1 and 2 of the Big River 445 PUD District; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD and its associated plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD, subject to the requirements of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the adopted Big River PUD District standards, as well as other applicable standards of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Regional Commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Big River PUD District establishes standards and development regulations consistent with the land use policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-06 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 6t", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed Zoning District is consistent with the intent and purpose of the plans, goals, and policies of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Future Land Use Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD District and the associated development plans accommodate additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed PUD accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, and are consistent with the applicable land use policies and ordinances, including policies of both MnDOT and Wright County. 7. As a property which has been designated for such uses for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the proposed amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance creating the Big River 445 PUD District, and rezoning the area being platted CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-06 as Lots 1 and 2, and Outlot A, all of Big River 445 to the Big River 445 PUD District, subject to the approval of the final plat of Big River 445. ADOPTED this 61" day of February, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Angela Schum By: /7 /s Andrew Tapper, V'�Chair mmunity 'Develoent Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD FOR BIG RIVER 445 — PHASE 1 WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Development Stage Planned Unit Development approval for a portion of a multi -phased commercial project, currently vacant land, to be platted as Lots 1 and 2, as well as Outlot A, of the Big River 445 plat; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD would consist of development opportunity for a multiple -building commercial retail center as an allowed use in the proposed Big River 445 Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to requests for simple subdivision creating the subject property for platting, a preliminary plat for the proposed project, and an amendment to the City's PUD zoning ordinance and rezoning to Big River 445 PUD District; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD, subject to the requirements of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the appropriate PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Regional Commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Development Stage PUD addresses Phase 1 improvements serving the project, as well as site and architectural improvements on Lots 1 and 2 of the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PUD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-07 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 6th, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed PUD accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations and are consistent with the applicable land use policies and ordinances, including policies of both MnDOT and Wright County. 7. As a property which has been designated for such regional commercial uses for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the proposed Development Stage PUD for Phase 1 of Big River 445 be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-07 1. Development stage PUD and amendment to the PUD shall be required for remaining proposed development parcels within Outlot A of the plat, as they may be configured at the time of application for final plat. 2. Approval of the rezoning to planned unit development is conditioned on the approval of the final plat of Big River 445. 3. Consolidated site and building signage shall be as specified in the application package for the Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat of Big River 445 dated January 8, 2024. 4. Building enhancements for Lots 1 and 2 as noted in the staff report of February 6, 2024 are incorporated into final development plans. 5. The trash enclosure on Lot 1, Block 1 shall be relocated further from the Chelsea Road street frontage, and all trash enclosure areas shall be located and screened to de-emphasize their visual impacts on the site as viewed from surrounding public areas. 6. Sidewalk to the proposed Lot 7 shall be provided at the time of Development Stage PUD for this phase. 7. Sidewalk and other improvements for proposed Lots 6 and 7 shall be provided at the time of platting and Development Stage PUD for those parcels. 8. The full private street, sidewalk, and utility development serving Lots 1 and 2 of the subject phases, as well as all parcels abutting Chelsea Road, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. 9. Public improvements, including any of those in the Chelsea Road or Fenning Avenue rights of way, shall be developed and constructed as a part of Phase 1 improvements. 10. As a part of Final PUD approval, an amended preliminary plan set shall be developed illustrating conceptual locations for site amenities, including seating, walking, and rest areas for patrons of the project which shall be subject to ongoing review and refinement as future phases are developed, with timing of construction to be determined. 11. An amended plan set showing additional screening or visual enhancement shall be provided as a part of any Final Stage PUD application for the outdoor patio CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-07 area proposed for Lot 1, Block 1, particularly in those areas facing Fenning Avenue. 12. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared access, use and maintenance of the private road and site signage within the planned unit development, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. 13. Execution and recording of a legal document providing for the shared parking between Lots 1 and 2. Block 1 of the plat, subject to the comments of the City Attorney. 14. Execution of a stormwater maintenance agreement providing for common and shared use of the proposed stormwater maintenance facilities, including those public easements required by the City Engineer. 15. Execution and recording of a development governing the plat in accordance with the standard requirements of the City Ordinance and the additional requirements noted in the report. 16. Compliance with the terms and comments of the City's Engineering staff letter and plan sheet review and traffic memo review comments dated January 29, 2024. 17. Compliance with the comments of the Wright County Highway Engineer's Department and the comments of MnDOT. 18. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 6t" day of February, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: Andrew 2rllr�, CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-07 ATTEST: Angela Sch m n , ommunity Development Director ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE XV, § 153.047 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CREATING THE PUD, BIG RIVER 445 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT: PLAT OF BIG RIVER 445 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section § 153.047, PUD Districts, is hereby amended to add the following: (V) Big River 445 PUD District (1) Purpose. The purpose of the Big River 445 PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for mixed commercial land uses. (2) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Big River 445 PUD District shall be those uses listed as permitted and conditional uses in the B-4 Regional Business District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage PUD Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , and subject to the conditions of approval imposed by City Council Resolution No. , and as may be further amended. The introduction of any other use or change in density shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, 153.047(0)(9)(b) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD. (3) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to the various commercial uses, as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans for each phase. (4) District performance standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Big River 445 PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. (5) In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the B-4 Regional Business District shall apply throughout. ORDINANCE NO. (6) Where there are any conflicts in the allowed uses or required performance standards between the Big River 445 PUD District and the B- 4 Regional Business District, the requirements of the Big River 445 PUD District and its associated plans shall prevail. (7) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of § 153.028(0)(10). The city may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this day of , 2024. ATTEST: Rachael Leonard, City Administrator AYES: NAYS: Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor 2 January 8, 2024 Angela Schuman -Community Development Director Members of the City Council and Planning Commission City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: BIG RIVER 445-Proposed Commercial Development PUD-Development Stage (proposed Lots 1 and 2) Rezoning to B4/PUD Simple Subdivision and Preliminary Plat Ms. Schuman and Members of the City Council/Planning Commission: Division 25, LLC is pleased to present this request for review and approval for a proposed eight lot commercial development located in the southwest quadrant of Interstate Highway 94 and Fenning Avenue NE. Overview • Land Area: Approximately 10.0 acres • Existing Zoning: B-2 Limited Business District • Proposed Zoning: PUD based on B-4 Regional Business District • Guided Land Use: Regional Commercial • Lots: 8 Lots (Lots 1 and 2 to be platted initially) • Access: Chelsea Road to private interior common roads/drive lanes • Utilities: City utilities • Purpose: Project will bring high demand regional and national commercial retail/restaurant/service users to this vibrant commercial corridor with an eye towards future expansion on up to 13 additional acres to the west Request Division 25, LLC is seeking review and approval of a Simple Subdivision, Preliminary Plat, Rezoning to B4 with PUD and Development Stage PUD on an area encompassing approximately 10.0 acres in the southwest quadrant of Interstate Hwy 94 and Fenning Ave NE. The PUD will include 8 Lots and an interior private roadway system accessed from the Chelsea Road public right of way. Project will be served by City utilities. This project is being designed and envisioned with an eye towards possible future expansion to the west on up to 13 additional acres as was presented with Concept PUD review in August of 2023. (per conceptual plan below). The PUD would be consistent with B-4 Regional Commercial District Development Standards and with the Regional Commercial Land Use Designation. Conceptual Future Expansion L---- - - - - - - 10 Acre PUD r SLIM 700 -- --- -- -t - —7,9 -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- ----------- -- -------- ------ - - -- - - - - -------- ---- - v L 17 1111 1 1 111 I I COF Future Lot 5, Future Lot 4 2 2 \�44 L - ------------- CHELSEA ROAD W I Lot Users (preliminary, subject to change) Lot 1, Block 1: Restaurant -Coffee with full drive thru Lot 2, Block 1: Restaurant-QSR with drive thru Lot 3, Block 1: Future -Possible Banking Facility Lot 4, Block 1: Future -Possible Auto Service Minor -Oil (quick service) Lot 5, Block 1: Future -Possible Auto car wash facility -tunnel concept Lot 6, Block 1: Future -Possible Auto Service Minor -tire Lot 7, Block 1: Future -Possible Restaurant-QSR with drive thru Lot 8, Block 1: Future -Possible Restaurant-QSR with drive thru or C-Store Note that the above users and lot sizes are based on the current roster of users, however changes could be made to the lot sizes, number of lots, etc. if users or user requirements change. INTERSTATE 94 , I a_—�-, _16 1 ` , i\ z Future Cot 6 Future Lot 7 Future Lot 8 J nQrovempnts Improvements Improvements qG CO3 co l I¢ i L, Future Lot 5 Future Lot 4 Future Lot 3 Improvements ImprovemenE$ Improvements QS a y t y t osed Fin sre to Lais f and'2, ' —7 — - - _witJ!,Me`r6ihairtrri CHELSEAROADW - •----.�..- .. yPDrtion'pfthe�= - - - 7tlacres to be Outlot until such Initial improvements to include full buifdout of time that development offuture Lots 3-8 is Lots 1 and Z plus the construction of stormwater advanced with subsequent applications for facilities, both accesses to Chelsea Road, and the Development Stage PUD, PUDAmmendment interior roadway, pedestrian trail and all utility mains, and FinaFPlat. Proposed Preliminary Plat PRELIMINARY PLAT OF VIeINITYMAP BIG RIVER 445 for- DIVISION 25, LLC LEGEND NORTH L ... .. ...... SITERATA 7�1 GENERILLIOTES 0 L 0 CK I 4- F- B. Ron A SRNs. INC. 6776 L. onal Land S yors D Profess I ur" W r rve NE, Suite 110 Lino Law MIN 550 Final Plat Exhibit (future submittal, Lots 1 and 2 to be platted) PROPOSED FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT OF: y BIG RIVER III IMP445 Low, 2 A r A BLOCK 7 1MUZ N < " 1Z. z W NORTH rfLF F IN I R110 It SONS INC Professional Land Surveyors 4 PUD Discussion Access and Roadways Access to the project will be from Chelsea Road public right of way. Individual Lots will be accessed from private interior roadway as illustrated on the Concept Plan and in the engineered plan submittal. Trailways and Sidewalks There is an existing trailway network that runs along the entire frontage of the subject property, on the west side of Fenning Avenue and on the north side of Chelsea Road. The project proposes two sidewalk connections to the trail along Chelsea Road, one each at the east and west access points to Chelsea Road. A sidewalk is proposed along the interior roadway with connections to each lot/building. The proposed concept provides excellent walkability throughout. Density The project will consist of 8 lots situated on 10 acres, for a gross density of 0.8 lots per acre. Lot sizes range from 0.64 acres to 1.85 acres, with an average lot size of 1.25 acres. There are no density requirements in the B-4 zoning district, therefore the proposed project complies. See Concept Plan for individual lot data. Imperviousness Impervious areas for each lot are listed on the site plan and are based on the actual measured impervious areas shown on the site plan. To provide flexibility for the future lots, the stormwater management system has been designed assuming that the entire site will be 75 percent impervious. Therefore, the maximum allowable impervious area for the initial 10 acres of development is 7.5 acres. Based on 75% imperviousness, the 1.1 inch stormwater volume requirement is 0.688 acre feet. The stormwater basins as designed provide a combined volume abstraction of 0.805 acre feet, or 17% more than required. This may result in a possible reduction in the Trunk Storm Sewer (alternate ponding) fee. The site plan as illustrated has only 66% total imperviousness, providing even more flexibility. Parkina and Building Setbacks The B-4 zoning district requires a 6-foot building and parking setback on all sides of a lot. The proposed concept plan is in general compliance with the building and parking setback, except along common lot lines within a shared parking lot or shared private interior drive. PUD flexibility is requested for the interior common lot line setback due to shared parking lots and shared private interior drives. Parking The City Code generally requires retail commercial uses to provide parking at a rate of one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. This equates to 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed concept plan has an overall parking ratio of 8 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. There are five possible restaurant lots with parking ratios varying from 10 to 13 spaces per 1,000 square feet consistent with Tenant requirements. There are three automotive related lots (oil, carwash, tires) with parking ratios varying from 3 to 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Parking is provided at a rate that is sufficient to meet the standard requirements of the prospective users. Parking area for the coffee and QSR users on Lots 1 and 2 is a shared parking field bisected by a common lot line. Sianaae Building and site signage shall be compliant with requirements and allowances as set forth in Section 153.064(J)(2) of the City Code, as relates to a business zoning district. Building wall signage will be requested to be allowed on all building facades, and compliant with maximum signage area as per 153.064(J)(2)(a). The Developer seeks clarification as to whether the private interior roadway will be considered as "Frontage" for purposes of establishing allowable building wall signage? Alternatively, we request that for an interior lot with single Public ROW frontage that the longest building fagade be the basis for calculating allowable area (see Lot 2 as example). Freestanding monument style signage will be requested as one sign per Lot as allowed by 153.064(J)(2)(b), with the note that we are proposing to limit these monument signs to a maximum signage area of 60 sf per side (as opposed to 100 sf). As a component of this PUD, we are also requesting that a multi-user highway pylon sign be allowed to be installed, with an overall sign structure height of 35' and signage area not to exceed 275 sf per side, and a multi-user monument style sign allowed to be installed, with and overall height not to exceed 22' and 135 sf signage area. See conceptual detailing and plan below: INTERSTATEN "A" MULTI -TENANT PYLON SIGN 'Future � Future 1 1 1 PROPOSED - - MONUMENT SIGN - (shared Lots 1 8 2) '6" MULTI -TENANT MONUMENT SIGN (Future Future - -- I Future Ifl 7i • Si � 60 SF MA% SIGN AREA i "D" FUTURE MONUMENT SIGNS (future Lots 3-8) 60 SF MAX SIGNAGE AREA PER SIDE Buildinq Materials :g "C" PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN (shared for Lots 1 and 2) 60 SF SIGNAGE AREA PER SIDE "A" MULTI -TENANT PYLON SIGN 35' OVERALL HEIGHT 275 SF SIGNAGE AREA PER SIDE "B" MULTI -TENANT MONUMENT SIGN 22' OVERAL HEIGHT 135 SF SIGNAGE AREA PER SIDE Building shall be designed and constructed to meet or exceed all business district building material requirements as per Section 153.070 (D). Consistency and cohesive design will be encouraged while maintaining brand integrity for all users. Building elevations and exterior material breakdowns have been provided in the plan submittal package for the proposed coffee user on Lot 1 (13% glass storefront, 28% brick, 18% wood, 36% EIFS, 5% architectural metal) and the proposed QSR user on Lot 2 (17% glass storefront, 33% brick,39% EIFS, 11% architectural metal). Trash Handling Trash handling and recycling areas on each proposed and future parcel shall be located and oriented in compliance with Ordinance Section 153.092(D)(36), shall be masonry in construction and shall incorporate opaque metal or composite gates. Screening will be incorporated where needed. Typical details below: DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE FINISH SCHEDULE �ewm"cx ARCHITECT TO MODIFY PER PROJECT ARCHITECTTO CONFIRM ORIENTATION OF �drvcxxx DUMETERON x� r PROJECT BASIS --- � QI x� Rr�enro oxl --------- m [alrxnr, k I \ . sEe9lsvlot K� , � / L Rum I DIIMPSRSR PI AN ya�-ra PREFlNI-.TT COPING..REFER T9 III; — FlNISH SCHmVLE MPN VUOR. REFER TO 1IN6H SLHEVULF � F"i` I I �8°X 16"FLOC%, REFER I I I f TO FINISH SLHED DUMPSTER ELEVATION 711 fiEf fi�S>IQiP� — yI { SEE B/5pi01 � — Requested Areas of Flexibilitv from Standard Zonina Ordinance r3 DUMPSTERELEVATION �, 1._,.I It is our understanding and intent that all components of this project design are consistent with B-4 Zoning District Standards and all other requirements of City Code, with (2) exceptions as follows: 1. Individual Lots shall be accessed via private interior roadways, as opposed to direct access to a public right of way. 2. Interior parking setback to be zero, as opposed to the 6-foot requirement. 3. A 35' tall maximum height multi-user pylon sign with maximum signage area not to exceed 275 sf per side will be allowed on the north frontage at 1-94. 4. A 22' tall maximum height multi-user monument sign with maximum signage area not to exceed 135 sf per side will be allowed on the east frontage at Fenning Avenue NE. Declaration of Easements, Covenants and Restrictions Developer has put in place a Declaration of Easements, Covenants and Restrictions that will be binding over all Tenants/Users in the PUD. Confidential document to made available for review as needed. Developer Acknowledgement of Financial Requirements Developer acknowledges that the City may require financial guarantees for the installation of certain improvements such as roadways and utilities and will work with staff to define these obligations. Developer also acknowledges that with the initial platting of Lots 1 and 2, totaling 1.98 acres, there will be associated Trunk Sanitary Sewer, Trunk Storm Sewer and Trunk Water Fees as per the current 2024 fee schedule. Schedule Grading is anticipated to commence in the late spring of 2024. Street and utility construction would also occur in the Summer 2024. Construction of buildings and improvements for Lots 1 and 2 would commence spring/summer of 2024, with some possible completions by fall of 2024. It is anticipated that we will be in a position with additional users to submit quickly for Development Stage PUD/PUD Amendment/Final Plat on some of the future lots 3-8. Closing We are excited to partner with the City of Monticello to bring this development and these businesses to the community. Your guidance and feedback are welcomed. If you have any questions or require further information, please contact me at 612-817-2302 or via email at iohn.iohannson(a�transwestern.com Respectfully, John Johannson-Transwestern 7601 France Ave, Suite 525 Edina, MN 55435 John.iohannson(@transwestern.com 612.817.2302 Chris Simmons-Transwestern 7601 France Ave, Suite 525 Edina, MN 55435 Chris. simmons(a)transwestern.com 612.889.8157 Dave Carland-Venture Pass Partners, LLC 19620 Waterford Ct Shorewood, MN 55331 dcarland(a)venturepass.net 612.963.9107 DEVELOPMENT STAGE UD PLANS —MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY SITE LOCATION MAP 181S�9V_77M E �� ' 0 y/SI X"N \ `Ppi River — �g0� \1 ERV/Ew DR c;RIVER-MILL D �� z� W 4 w FOR BIG RIVER 445 AERIAL MAP MONTICELLO, MN c ISHEETINDEXI C0.0 TITLE SHEET V1.1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY V1.2 SIMPLE SUBDIVISION V1.3 PRELIMINARY PLAT V1.4 FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN C2.1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - OVERALL C2.2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - EAST C2.3 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - WEST C3.1 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN - OVERALL C3.2 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN - EAST C3.3 PRELI M I NARY UTI LITY PLAN - WEST C4.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - OVERALL C4.2 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - EAST C4.3 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - WEST C5.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE I C5.2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE II C5.3 SWPPP NARRATIVE C6.1 - C6.6 DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN - OVERALL TREE PLAN L1.2 LANDSCAPE PLAN - EAST HALF ENLARGEMENT L1.3 LANDSCAPE PLAN - WEST HALF ENLARGEMENT �z M O ch U Lr) 0 N Z U w O Q I— o =O Z Y Y O LL Y U U O � 2% ~ w - Lu f 1 N N N z o� Z I*_ Of N W I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE:' o- j -, DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 F_ m N co O O w Q 0 w co 0 Z 0 W = — N M 'Zi Lo w Z O N VLf) LLJ J F- J =) M �/�� 't L1 / u Lf N w Ln) Z < 0 w Q 0 Z (n Z > = Lu 0 0CD Q W W = W W �o 0 z Z � J m J w U z 0 a L1.4 LANDSCAPE PLAN - FOUNDATION PLANTINGS AND DETAILS SHEET NUMBER N o 0 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY --for-- DIVISION 25, LLC --of-- PART OF LOTS 175 185 & 195 AU D. SUB. NO. 1 VICINITY MAP SEC. 13, TWP. 121, RNG. 25 Northwest corner of the --Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 121, Range 25 QLn �� ego EXISTING PARCEL DESCRIPTION N Ln /@ M m That part of Lots 17, 18 and 19, Auditors Subdivision No. One, lying West of Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat Number 55 and lying Southwesterly of the Southwesterly right of way CyFSF tiwgY/VO 94 w o z° o C of Interstate Highway No. 94 being part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. Which also lies northeasterly of the following described q �Cq N ' ° ~ line: ° z 00 v � 01`10 o-� Q� 0 v ° a / O Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 minutes 38 seconds West along the West line of said Northwest z C i �' o N 3 Quarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 4016.29 feet; thence W QJ LL (y / southeasterly 196.62 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 437.39 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds; thence Easterly tangent to said curve, 100.00 feet to a point on the East line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, distant 102.25 feet North of the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said centerline there terminating. I sCN001_ BLVD Ib o 10 Wright County, Minnesota. NORTH a _ (Abstract Property) --- WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) / x958.3 x957.6 3x S19 GRAPHIC\SCALE x9s9.4 1� \ 100 0 50 100 200 x 958.4 x 957.5 °�, 958.7x 959.4x �� i � x 958.6 x 957.9 x 959.3 sy \ 958.7 x 958.8 x 959.5 x 958.8 959.1 x \ 958.9 959.0 959.1x q INCII 100FEET BENCHMARK x 959.3 958.8 x x 958.9 ojh � o \ 958.6 959.0x ,P ° MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF \\ \ \ 958 9 958 959.3 959.3 59 z ��° TRANSPORTATION GSID STATION #85903 `� \ \ x959.4 958.9 x959.0 ti ya9 (NAME: 8680 BE) � \ x 960.0 °/ \ \ \ x959.2 9S7 959.Ox wsj ELEVATION: 969.17 (NAVD 88) n I I r\ I -r i� r\ xi i� h R 1 `� ��i x �i I I i�i I 958.4 \� Gv 0 x 957.1 In 960.1 x 958.0 959.0 o Oy / �q^ S PIN No. 155-011-000111 956.0 OI 959.5 _ _ A 959.3 x �° S2x F F/gFRLrJ a ^ (l owner: Monticello Industrial Park Inc I S88044'07ff \ 11 957.9 9S F 0 ',�' S Address: Unassigned x956.4 v 959.1 ` ' 9S x959.4 958.9x TC4.9 SIx 9S F'BFR\ orb �6� x957.5 1231 •16 x95R 7 95 \ g- \\ �x� x958.7 x959.1 8.3 58.2 x 960.1 x 958.6 p� x 958.6 �qf /' �/j 4th 171, , , x9s\F x956.3 956 9s8.a \� North line of Lot 18, 0� x958.6 �w / Noe °F nester/ - ' 9qa 4'8 n \ x955.s 960.3 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 958.8 /a 9 t 1 r 954,6 \\ o x959.3 958.3 NO. ONE x958.8 958.5 h� 4� dS/77 e/AX Of \ _ c 101, 955.2 4j G Rim=952.7 {� \ P / gS4 FigR �h c _Inv(N)=947.4 958.4 958.7 g0 OhU /gh �Vdj / \ 3 \ x o Inv(E)=948.2 959.0 �3 n7C° wd b Rim-954.3 �c 9S\ / Inv(S)=947.4 959.0 958.6 -Inv(N)=947.0 \ 1 43 95 Fg9.0 / 958.6 958.4 fib• n� ,j`�n / < , Inv (E)=945.7 Sq„ 93j 47 \ \9SS955.0 958.7 .5x O, eY 1 Inv(S)=950.3 RCP CCS �� x9S F,� "Rim=952.8 x958.4 x958.4 �h� �� '1� \ L,' T 39 \x0955.2 /6 ' 'e OdalN x958.3 958.3 05$0 4°� 0 / dse dy x 95s.1 ox rn p c S ne e /y /'l d T OIl yo c / 9S38 \ \ / O. 3) e!/t naUtj 958.5 958 958.3 0 x958.0 ^ M �ht0/' wn .1 �6,. / 9 per //t x957.8 u w gdar ss. Lent 24I,0 / Rim=953.2 G D �c RCP sS4.2 gS4 \ Rx 95\ j44 OOc4Y x 958.6 x 958.2 x 958.1 x "ent dy (Inasr/arye 0010 Inv(N)=947.0---\� �\ 3Y \\�956.3 went x958.5 957.6 9$8 x957.7 Sign O/O,i Inv(W)=946.7 qg\\ 9 q• F/gF\ R x958.1 d 9S Inv(E)=947.3 RCp 4x x957.0 ^• n' �� 44C G c� / gS4 \ \ q� ^ x 957.9 957.4 957.1 x 956.4 a` (Jg - --- qs D \\qg� x h Rim=954.2 x957.9 R ��101.27 f ff `I�R�iGy / pIN R, 9s4 \ \ (Q-Inv(N)=948.7 _-\ x957.4 957.1 956.7 wSIG ; N55*48 11 W I�yT \ OI,I, '(/O, 1 'h�9 I / Sx \ Q / Inv(S)-948.6 ner. IS nv, S3 \ 0., \\ \ I T x 957.7 n' / OF 'q Apares LenS'24I 94jse / \ G PVc 9SSx' FR 957.5 �' �- rd%/ 957.1 x957.1 956.3 / °OI qS qZ„ 0 \ / edS ar / ? i 957.7 9$ VO 2pCanyo °IO \ / \ F��x 58.0/ /� e/7� djh 957.0 6 h ,,e C/) . he/Sea/ain9s \\ 3 �S eFR \ / O, e//t dge x 957.6 g56?x 955.9 x R g%b/e /rOh ^ ROaattC \q5 6"RCp S 9SS� 058.3 �jjp4jsroon°`t// \ 957.1 958.2 958.2 wSIG Cep p%pe t/�%ght° 9 D gSS6x R\ 958.4 CUB /tl - 957.2 CO* /� he of ,, \ e 958.5 9ss.s 9$ °h y6. 3 Fj St cc ^� GENERAL NOTES pl�� In,,9gggS S , b BE\x956.3 nt`�\ 957.4 9 ox °� ti x a a N nd/CeteOFesS7 O,O 4 g R R (� h C i , q nen ISS. Rind G SS9 \ b x958.6 x959.1 O5 y� 3x ,� ,y h l 28i%fjC //)n 9ujre < tl-loss. -111 Iq3 tn�\ sSq C��\ \\x958.3 0' 957.9 9 b O o jS dto eS0 a6 < i�� Ss' Soo OOIO 938, 68 _/ 2q„/ 9S6, I F'gFR \0� I i� I I r\ r� I i I i� ix i N n I � g x fig• � 0) , x o 9 o pC to pe y 00 C Llse, tat` 91 I -Inv 950.0 958.4 i l� i x9 i I tv I . i 19s8 i� i I \ v 0° -o Oyu 959 5 x ham* t/n7en r 1. Fee ownership is vested in Monticello Industrial Park, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. AeaRoaatc\\ �� q / 3 ss2F gss.3 Tr9s& 9589 s9° 958.2 g5$ 9s9.4x t c 2„RCP c 958.4 dj/ x959.8 ��ho. i \ 40 qS p g g / g/,/ dse Ord% x 959.2 x 958.5 ^ o, h° 959.4 x 958.8 40 Parcel ID Number: 155011000171. _ �s63os4°js2 �� C , Ssgx F/ I No, ?ienthdge 960.3 (�`9 ` 32 SSO gFR�F\� 2q,RCP Ix 58.8 �jjjS�g eroOh°Ut% x959.4 x959.1 959.0X 4' 2. Per Wright Count Tax Records the surveyedproperty's address is unassigned. Fo \rg qs D , s, \ °j c4�7 //ty 9597 959.9 959 9 �4to 3, e )\\InmIS) 949.3- 4 9S> \ 95\ e x959.4 5B813 rn� �L 8 `� 9 Y Y 9 sc /gFx /7t 959.1 w Ap Inv(S)-951.2 qg '6x 58.8 '� x960.1 :(/ `•' v ^ PI FR 9S \ °/a\ hx959.1 �h ° 5x U 4(h, 3. Bearings shown hereon are based on the Wright Count Coordinate System. N c ,x FR o a x959.5 .1 06 ,I / a g 9 Y Y °w�O \ S S � �° ti �' A x 960.5 qa ner; ISS. F F 0 S8 a Rim=957.3 �Q V 959.1 °� a 01" � C �� SO(J dress UMC I43,0 R •Ox eR /-Inv(N)=951.7 960 (q Zx960.0 �w // /jh6l,4. Surve ed remises shown on this surve ma is in Flood Zone X Area determined to be outside 500- ear flood lain accordin to - �nReW °I020 Gqs c 9s8Ix n959.616 960.8 Q o x959.2 g�/ /VeOfI ester/Y p Y p ( Y p ) 9 x dss; FSt r = 0 960.1 °a/ 9 nt yr. Flood Insurance Rate Ma Community -Panel Panel Number 270534 0015 B b the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date 9n dte . 960.9 o ti h �x P Y- Y 9 Y 9Y, ea tt IR \� / 9s-1 FR �59.8 a ti x 959.0 a o s dte t °� c m, \ \x 1$6 a st gh August 4, 1988. 9-19. e R C T 9S \F�ati Trd/ x960.9 Q Q x960.0 958.7 ro' '� \ 4 P &.>x (g 59.9 / Ax tix 1 gh Y s \ � ed ar x 958.8 SB 11 °v' rn hJ I'I' D S8 \ o se dj 1 1 y�. eh dY 9 /�/ /Tj /7 x 960.9 x 959.9 • °j 1 Ca 9 o to <' J\.3 T Fe 60.1 e' O q e17t dge l 960.1 0 Sx a S8 ° i i , /, \ Inns l9 1 q 0,. RCA 10, g\ Fg\ rn jj j per d/Ja 960.9 x \\ SB 14 x 958.9 x o�$\�O .6 rn� 5. Boundary area of the surveyed premises: f1 143 961 sq. ft. (f26.26 acres). (S 9S R\ 9s \ ^ w/ssZ'g� Pic Tc 9 \ \ g80 O°c 4tj/% \ 959.9 oh 0� so sg I 4 t o`• ax 3x 9\ FR 960.5 �ehte\ 960.8x x959.8 x959.1 �x �y0' $Ax /� ., 6. The surveyed premises has access to Chelsea Road (a public road). Access to Interstate 94 and C.S.A.H. No. 18 from the surveyed property is restricted. ^ p 18, / S9 - ) \ ' a5 -gate li IN RCp T SxV Fx 60.7 I Coll / O / 1 x 961.0 � x 959.2 x �o O \o \ gFR� 1 Sx 958.2 rn Wner' ISS 9 fig \ \ 06 y i/,vI \ 959.6 °� h �' 3x �$,---R% 7. No zoningendorsement letter was provided to the surveyor at the time of the survey, however, a search of the Cityof Monticello's website indicates the surveyed adresS.T4,/, ISO\ TC 96 \\ g\°�/ / �/ 961.o O 959.z �,� 95B 9s0.s x o�, Mo utof w p Y Y i Y < SZ0 C;ty °I0I S 0Ox \ FR I ti l 959.7 x959.6 958.9 957.9x (TT O0 w; rl7en dy property is currently zoned IBC. For additional information regarding zoning and setbacks, contact the Development and Planning Department at the City of ,' �, r\ the/°/,, R 96° y x960.8 sB 12 OSB 10 S4e f Monticello. < ^ e oat o� M9 93 ox 9 960.9 • 957.5x v S.9 r < a R C IOC\ 9S \ \l{ x 959.4 957.8 1 ' lm 96 - J d pony q°> S Ri 60•0 \ 60.6 x960.6 958.4 *sB9 957.7x CT Rim 965.1 6°\x rd 960.5 I i� x959.3 i� I r- w / '\ /, e / •°op 9.2 •0x 60.4 ��p, i��e // 0 x960.4 957.9 Inv(E)=960.6 / 8. No buildings were observed on the surveyed property at the time of the survey. �r , ^ \� o / , ds ar s61 i \ I I I I I i \ i �- W _ Inv(S)=960.5 ' ' / Ii ° " Ri 9S -9, e \ ��96 / 1110 e/i7 d/n I V ♦ i x 959.4 ♦ i I V L _ 40- �Y ^` tnMc 9 S„R 1 9x 9 / q eryt dge 960.0 957.5x x �LL1. T N }' 9. No parking stalls were observed on the surveyed property at the time of the survey. \=`�` 9g10 D , S96x \ \9603 jjo4�s2 O� 4a4tj/%t 959,$ 959.59594 o°C4j,,e�rd%/eds76 I0 I 965.3RCP2 LEGEND h7e Y tN e/7j 956.9 _� TC - IS o U ,' , \ �C Otp 95 , R� ti ht �� x959.7 °• gjue�tpe 956.5x oi:Lj 364.8 6 UO 10. Above ground utilities have been field located as shown. Underground utilities shown hereon are those which were field marked by utility companies responding to %/^ ' rIR v9s9q T \ \ a /"'IR�N9959.3 958.7 z�332�\ON UP �Izc ° ►- , n� Jcg ri \ Inv J. � � t0 - a-+ Gopher State One Call, Ticket No. 231780466 & 231780467, dated 7/05/2023 or were taken from utility plans provided by the City of Moniticello. All underground (F/,9S2z6 g F, ° ioQ (s/,9SL1 C 958.1 igSs _1° • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED S c 60.2 o I x958.9 958.8 \ .9x L) locations shown hereon are APPROXIMATE. Prior to any excavations or digging, contact Gopher State One Call for an on -site location (651-454-0002). However, g 9� ooy� 959.5 �SB4 957.1 955 SB8 �r� a tp 8 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET MARKED RLS# 58542 \ S R \ // o �s6 z x959.1 s6 $ O 00 ° di w a; u lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely, and reliably depicted. In addition, Gopher State One Call locate \ • 060•M� 0 'C 'qcc 9s6.3 �- ° u -• pl 2 �e F h° ' O `9 x 959.2 %1/r' ess 955.6 x o . all• In Nand other similar utility locate requests from surveyors may be ignored or result in an incomplete response. Where additional or more detailed information is A DENOTES FOUND PKNAIL ^I,° _ °Wrie0.r ISS. \ \° 3 „ Tc rc A c'jx o °�=� ti 9ss.s R/9/7 -C �tro/ 9ss.o h o °'_ required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. ; ^ Agares rSO 240 0 RCp \ qh k Rim=956.8 t°� 04nt ds 0, � I, u- q Y Y v , ' s' �na982 °0°OIp In�'9g18B r, F \/� Inv(Sj=952.3 --_ Ord• 0959.2 x958.5 �^ 11/dy y/ijgshO(4 ul ° d x i ii- p DENOTES SET PKNAIL \� DENOTES WRIGHT COUNTY SECTION MONUMENT S/sn 9 r'R, F Tc ' / _e /"a s63 pjd ht1 n° 9ss.1�jx 'n o ea t m,y o 1n 59.3 / dse 9e 957.7 t/V dj h o 0) / 11. Subsurface and environmental conditions were not examined or considered during the process of this survey. No statement is made concerning the existence of �_' °�rN Sg.1 9q �>' / n'o `fie do °• - W _ -4 DENOTES STOP LIGHT Ins( /,9 a RCP► `9 9 9s8.7 / ryt a4 956.9 h S iw 962.9:n / underground or overhead containers or facilities that may affect the use or development of the surveyed premises. In�(S9g9� pu D� , x ' 9S, o,� �j10 erotl/Ity S \I I° o Tc__; 4q }:_ ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN _ S3q / PVC �I,.\ gs oys6 �$j °cUTi7eht sBsslO x956.1 °'h954.3 i 9406� 12. Title Commitment File Number 67553, dated June 9, 2023 at 8:00 AM, prepared by Guaranty Commercial Title, Inc., as issuing agent for Old Republic National Title ❑E DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX Y/ , �'-;,; 30., �y Rim-955.6 955.3 • /. / RC Inv(N)=951.3 Z Insurance Company, Schedule B, Part II survey related items are shown hereon. DENOTES ELECTRICAL MANHOLE Y / 3 , '`� P 9 >2 g InvcS)=951.2 s 95O)\95� ss T61.6 �� 959.0 }- - X 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 0 953.9� 53'x ° z _ , 9 q. 9 00 DRAWN BY: KCM JOB NO: 231196PP DATE: 1/05/2024 _ �� 8I I9v(N/9 S \ 6 sss a5 a n ti ah ° W t ' Y/�` In (FJo 9S2.3\ �� 'S q t° hpo vh�op m �°� �, ❑F DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS cS rs q8. \ D I h h b s 954.0 x - v i , J. 1 9 x m a a n rn C) �. de , CHECK BY: KCM FIELD CREW: DT/CT ��j 9s > e, ' a C; ha q �? �� 2, / v' ii i , W \ i0 DENOTES GUY WIRE - o o DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS AS NOTED-,-- O �! c Tc ° �� `3� ' 3� °l`b *I•gkeas / i r Rpn 10„ / •9 / � c' w R 0� Co/, o" NO e 955.4 n I v, I w 960.0�--15" RCP 1 \ In 9 s n dg rt W rn m r- ❑H DENOTES HAND HOLE DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS AS NOTED S6 -~ i \\ XF ��c Ner ry h� s66� Rim=958.5 - 2 I hereby certify that this survey, plan 94 3 . m' Tc `- 1 < / , ;-0 • .• R x9 x x / Inv(W)=951. < i 956.6 a y / N 954.8 _ i Inv(E)=951.2 3 or report was prepared by me or under DENOTES HYDRANT = DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER - \ R/m ° x iv(SE)-950.8::= o i / ^ Iq� 9S6 G V�, ,~ \ g 6 \ / Rim-954x2 ( / 1 (N � 4 15 •I \ Inv=948.8- 4, IGN 15" RCP ry m direct supervision and that I am a >= DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER '�'' ti 1 I (F , 9s0 95 _ 8.7 Y p DENOTES LIGHT POLE ,9 9 6.i . 9s Rim=957.3 951.7 N0. DATE DESCRIPTION BY � (s/,9qS> �i:�t ? 33•- BER x956.2 6'S F C�----Inv=951.7 a9 duly Registered Land Surveyor under 09 DENOTES MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN C s11 22 ' / RCP �1"RCP _ \v 1 3.59 \ 18' RC 957. �.� - 0 enue Nun the laws of the State of Minnesota. � DENOTES POWER POLE CHU DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITY •�� Q� pRIg>1 3g �. D J_ "SIP ,/- 56.1 I , 9',7.6T�O N 1006 ffE RU n1am InammS��O`r O C-�� n"95.1 S / 1 Q�2 ° :�, :;; I? Ri =956.1 n 0 N �`2� OS DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE 46 q \ Inv(N)=949.4 3 545'22' �� I v(N)-9486�/ L.0 Cr 3j V81i Inv(E)=942.8- RCP " s I v(S)=948. . 24" DIP N y N Rim= 54.9 \ In , O O O ■ DENOTES SIGN GAS DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE 'L 4«9,, \\Inv(S)=949.7 R102 \, -C w w ° EST.1977 Kevin C. McCain p DENOTES SOIL BORING LOCATION. (BY OTHERS) FIBER DENOTES UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE Z2e� IZ \ \`\Inv=�44.OJa x(9gl to D36"RCR)> DI r �4 o iv�y4), i O C Professional Land Surveyors ■ r--- Rlm_9 c •?•� N89°09'34"E a 6776 Lake Dave N E Suite 110 OD DENOTES STORM SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE I InVrF) 55.50 _ _ _ In Q N aa. 1/05/2024 940.7 - i / N m C Date: License No. 5 54 L_ - - (N)=9qg N N www.egrud.com 7 0 DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -- I Inv(8/,g49. o v 3 v 3 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE I 8 ❑U DENOTES UTILITY BOX - I Roadway and utility r (n i F PIN No. 17-119-22-14-0008 I easement per Document- U 0 0 Da DENOTES WATER VALVE DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION�- . (n V z Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 DENOTES FENCE Owner: City of X (PER WRIGHT COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) _� No. 379144 -X-X- Address: Unassigned S:\RUD\CAD\23PROI\231196PP\PRELIMINARY\SIMPLE SUBDIVISION\231196PP-SIMPLESUB 231196PP CERTICATE.DWG EXISTING PARCEL DESCRIPTION SIMPLE SURIVISION That part of Lots 17, 18 and 19, Auditors Subdivision No. One, lying West of Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat Number 55 and lying Southwesterly of the Southwesterly right of way of Interstate Highway No. 94 being part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. Which also lies northeasterly of the following described line: VICINITY MAP SEC. 13, TWP. 121, RNG. 25 --for-- DIVISION o SO 57 LL f I 2 C --of-- PART O F LOTS 179189 & 199 AUD. SUB. NO. 1 Northwest corner of the '--Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 121, Range 25 / Commencing at the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 minutes 38 seconds West along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 4016.29 feet; thence southeasterly 196.62 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 437.39 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds; thence Easterly tangent to said curve, 100.00 feet to a point on the East line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, distant 102.25 feet North of the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said centerline there terminating. Y war O VI �° 9Q W z W �Q 0 Z Z z w LL SCHOOL BLVD .. =Ln co m And lying northwesterly of the following described line and its northeasterly and southwesterly extensions: \ o ��, o c _ w o L ° %/ Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 minutes 38 seconds West along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 Q 00" . w U, N minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 3971.28 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 26 degrees 27 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 530.28 feet to the southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Highway No. 94 and said line there terminating. --- °Coro Q) w .0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Ln° U 3 PROPOSED PARCEL R DESCRIPTION (NOT TO SCALE) ,� QJ Z) ° C:, ~ / (y That part of Lot 17, Auditors Subdivision No. One, Wright County, Minnesota, lying West of Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat Number 55, lying southwesterly of the southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Highway No. 94, lying northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 minutes 38 seconds West along the West line of said Northwest uarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 / 9 Q 9 9 9 Q p 9• 9 9 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 4016.29 feet; thence southeasterly 196.62 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 437.39 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds; thence Easterly tangent to said curve, 100.00 feet to a point on the East line / of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, distant 102.25 feet North of the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said centerline there terminating. / —' And lying southeasterly of the following described line and its northeasterly and southwesterly extensions: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 minutes 38 seconds West along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 3971.28 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 26 degrees 27 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 530.28 feet to the southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Highway No. 94 and said line there terminating. A I I r \ I —I— N r \ 1 \a \ \ \ PIN No. 155-011-000111 W \ Owner: Monticello Industrial Park Inc I S88044'07" II L \4 \� 100 / \ \ Address: Unassigned \ 0 50 100 200 \ \� 1231.61 _ S VI' eUth"'e \ 1 INCH = 100 FEET °F Ste \ N° Ihte Sr/y \ \ 4 • V •llr0 as ta4e�9ht Of , ir 0 \ R NORTH r \ \ \ / , ase ay h \� /?i \ ad eS ns.24z. NO 3 9Z44 e 6°c'tk 4 M 941� sway s' 0/7asria,7 �0O0I0 \ \ \ \ 4�ej�t S'9 ed /d'n9s//c ---- p \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ____ ---�,101 27 , „ (p�g� , IS N55 48 11 W / �/ \ rd// ' / qY 9 SS: 3z6 "lao °OZOz p \ \ \ \�.' / edSe o'rain �\ ' , l %/jet %nch 0 cr e� /o/d/ \ \ \ I N° '77ery dtlo ge 9ib/e iro \ ^ Sea ROad <<c \ \ \ \ �\ \ g1104,5� O Q / Uti/ity PARCEL S6 2 cab'l p'pe — , theght Of a o �ieht`\ (680,921 S.F.) 9 / �F„/d/Cate ess ^) GENERAL NOTES Add es°/-Iss,- z43. \ \ \ \ \ \ ° 28m e �ZS'�Ca o4jreab /, Ss. Cy 0oI0 \\ \\ I i� r� i� n i 9 °C tdp y ,10 1. Fee ownership is vested in Monticello Industrial Park, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. ooheseaR c<o, \ \ \ \ �� '" i �,' ; `�' ; „ ; '�; `� 4t�eh r 800 0C)s 40 Parcel ID Number: 155011000171. ;; ^I A r 1� \� \ ; / o e/?7 'edge M� 2. Per Wright County Tax Records, the surveyed property's address is unassigned. �ss3os4�1sz9 \ 2 \ \ \ \ 111g80z �O' �OA�� 3� ss os F 6'¢0 88 \ \ \ \ \ nt 89z 30 S O 3. Bearings shown hereon are based on the Wright County Coordinate System. " ' , F�escJ \\ oC N° I\ S, $O r Addres �M z43. Uth 4. Surveyed remises shown on this survey ma is in Flood Zone X Area determined to be outside 500- ear flood lain according to ` ` \ s, c a/°0 z \ \ \ \ ti° �` /' Nne Fwe er Y p Y p ( Y plain), / 9 °as ; FSr ° 0 \ 40 Q� 9 O• ° jntst /y Flood Insurance Rate Ma Community -Panel Panel Number 270534 0015 B b the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date 9ged ate<<c ;;`� \ \ \ \ `� o / 94 erst r'9h P Y- Y 9 Y 9 k �ti 'v °�; es ate t August 4, 1988. \ Tra// a a �' H o n/On h%gh way h / C/'�ehtewaY , - i \ •'l _ \ \ °• ent age 1 N off' d 5. Boundary area of the surveyed premises: f1,143,961 sq. ft. (f26.26 acres). \ \ \ \ \ g1114'oeroa,,0, _(0 Wright County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) PROPOSED PARCEL A DESCRIPTION That part of Lots 17, 18 and 19, Auditors Subdivision No. One, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of the southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Highway No. 94, lying northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 minutes 38 seconds West along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 4016.29 feet; thence southeasterly 196.62 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 437.39 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds; thence Easterly tangent to said curve, 100.00 feet to a point on the East line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, distant 102.25 feet North of the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said centerline there terminating. Itk 6. The surveyed premises has access to Chelsea Road (a public road). Access to Interstate 94 and C.S.A.H. No. 18 from the surveyed property is restricted. % ^ ''�\" ^ '�'e`'t�� l �\ \ \ v ; l 1 ^ ' ,' r gdpr e/-�T \ \ \ _ , — R/ght 7. No zoning endorsement letter was provided to the surveyor at the time of the survey, however, a search of the City of Monticello s website indicates the surveyed < eSS; w'nQtk o°� \ ; Non Ur,°f Wa property is currently zoned IBC. For additional information regarding zoning and setbacks contact the Development and Planning Department at the City of r ` S�0 h;°% °r0 \ \� \ ,{yS•48r y Monticello. c eROaa \ \ � [ O / a r\cast coo,"', \ " PARCEL B 8. No buildings were observed on the surveyed property at the time of the survey. -'F ' ''''" __ n� \Tra%/ (463,039 S.F.) �0 > \ 9. No parking stalls were observed on the surveyed property at the time of the survey. ; , ; - �\ \ �� \ a110g� e9oal)o, �, i = o 0 o \ \ S2 Oc4 ti/it 1 v i 1 v _ u, o —4 a, o •=- 10. Above ground utilities have been field located as shown. Underground utilities shown hereon are those which were field marked by utility companies responding to " ' _� _ \ \\ \ '''enty\ a ° Wfo ) Gopher State One Call, Ticket No. 231780466 & 231780467, dated 7/05/2023 or were taken from utility plans provided by the City of Moniticello. All underground v locations shown hereon are APPROXIMATE. Prior to any excavations or digging, contact Gopher State One Call for an on -site location (651-454-0002). However, \ \ \\ \ ,�/ %`� V M a) E Ln r ... lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely, and reliably depicted. In addition, Gopher State One Call locate 28�6 \ \\ I o O^ o M U Go and other similar utility locate requests from surveyors may be ignored or result in an incomplete response. Where additional or more detailed information is ^ oC N° I \\ S \ I -� �� required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. ;' ^ Aad�er: rsss,24 0 ,/ \ „,� -` ess o e ° o \ \ C' J O 11. Subsurface and environmental conditions were not examined or considered during the process of this survey. No statement is made concerning the existence of ILI- �� underground or overhead containers or facilities that may affect the use or development of the surveyed premises. ` \ •� \ \ ___- �; �;= 12. Title Commitment File Number 67553 dated June 9 2023 at 8:00 AM prepared by Guaranty Commercial Title Inc. as issuing agent for Old Republic National Title''-�edsena9e I o a L Y 1 J:: Sfj'¢¢�e� ¢\� \ % N° q �0�� e! �t//%ty O In _ _L_ Insurance Company,Schedule B Part II survey related items are shown hereon. LEGEND Y > t-- www.egrud.com DRAWN BY: KCM JOB NO: 231196PP DATE: Y o 3 0 - 1/05/2024 - \1 �T2s j \ s� Jai", \ \ \ SI c4�eht I 40 CHECK BY: KCM FIELD CREW: DT/CT • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED a t:_ 03,� = o •- r v U y 1 O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 58542 � , � �\ �' ;,;; , \ � \ \ I w 2 I hereby certify that this survey, plan <- < r 4.;}� \ \ \ ry % N 3 or report was prepared by me or under A DENOTES FOUND PKNAIL <, fJ \ \ \ / �\ U �'• A DENOTES SET PKNAIL iy, �R;. I \ ' a NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY my direct supervision and that I am a - , y \ _ , � duly Registered Land Surveyor under DENOTES WRIGHT COUNTY SECTION MONUMENT>;_ 1 3.59 CS Minthe laws of the State of Minnesota. —o o DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS, AS NOTED •��GRu --nom Inum- a�0 1¢�s3¢ ,�� —,� ----- --- N 10065"E ISL 0�% DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS, AS NOTED �C`ri3o38`¢�;3.00�� - 196 4--2 5�45,zz �r.�— /C�2� (� PIN No. 17-119-22-14-0008 •L \ ¢ ''8�' �� i� R=437. 9 _.::. ;jG r ,� rya - Owner: City of DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION \ g }' o ,0 Professional Land Surveyors Kevin C. McCain Address: Unassigned (PER WRIGHT COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) Z251� "9e"` ( �ioo.o4 ) ° y 6776 Lake Drive N E, Suite 110 Date: 1/05/2024 License No. 58542 ---- = N89°09'a4"E N _,: o Lino Lakes MN 55014 _ N Z) � ' /' o '` v �: Roadway and utility i �' I i r Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 — _ No.379144er Document.- — �, �, Z) z S:\RUD\CAD\23PROJ\231196PP\PRELIMINARY\SIMPLE 231196PP SUBDIVISION\231196PP-SIMPLESUBDIVISION.DWG PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: BIG RIVER 445 --for-- DIVISION 25, LLC PROPOSED PARCEL DESCRIPTION That part of Lot 17, Auditors Subdivision No. One, Wright County, Minnesota, lying West of Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat Number 55, lying southwesterly of the southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Highway No. 94, lying northeasterly of the following described line: LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 58542 A DENOTES FOUND PKNAIL A DENOTES SET PKNAIL lqpr DENOTES WRIGHT COUNTY SECTION MONUMENT Northwest corner of the Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 \I '--Northwest Quarter of Section g Q g g —0-0— DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS, AS NOTED 13, Township 121, Range 25 / minutes 38 seconds West along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of C. DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS, AS NOTED beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 4016.29 N PIN No. 17-119-22-14-0008 DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION a, �, feet; thence southeasterly 196.62 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 437.39 Owner: CityofX .. -C m / feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds; thence Easterly tangent to said curve, 100.00 feet to a Address: Unassigned (PER WRIGHT COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) j z° C point on the East line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, distant 102.25 feet North w o L ° of the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said centerline there terminating. 001-"� � o� o o bo , o a / And lying southeasterly of the following described line and its northeasterly and southwesterly extensions: SITE DATA O _j — a) / O 0 V) i C ° In l6 3 � (y -' Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 minutes 38 seconds West along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of TOTAL BOUNDARY AREA 463,603 S.F. (10.00 ACRES) beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 3971.28 feet LOT AREA` 'F327,43 S.F.. (0.00 ACRES) / to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 26 degrees 27 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance RIGHT OF WAY AREA 27,436 S.F. (0.63 ACRES) / of 530.28 feet to the southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Highway No. 94 and said line there terminating. A I I r\ I -I- N r\ 1 \a /Vo sejrie ra'na 7 gZZ01, 5 40 c d i NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 1 INCH = 100 FEET 9ht O A. h7ehty\ St, acces A) r - \ \ \ No ofM S ac94 GENERAL NOTES r \ \ \ \ \ 28�ZS/f catenneso /reab 1 h � , \ \ \ r \ I I \ / I / : 1 / \ N 1 O, \ \ a 9 OOct/ e/- 1. Fee ownership is vested in Monticello Industrial Park, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. - \ , — T 29 \ "\ ^ 28 Parcel ID Number: 155011000171. \�' \ \ �_; / /Vo se�era'pa \ \ ` '\ (S\ S640Z6 \ \ \ \ \ \ gZZZ480Z90o 4g4't't NOy \ �\ 2. Per Wright County Tax Records, the surveyed property's address is unassigned. 63°34°ss;-,9 \ \ \ n/enty \ \ 8 i3, Fos, \\ \\ o ' a g Ap 3. Bearings shown hereon are based on the Wright County Coordinate System. 6 � ,1 , c.� \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ Mo y 78,241 S. F. �TI� 4. Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Area determined to be outside 500 year flood plain), according to �� \ \ \ \ ,^ O O• Fqs o i \ Flood Insurance Rate Map Community -Panel Number 270534 0015 B by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date \ August 4, 1988. ' 1 \ "all \eas /Vna \ 5. Boundary area of the surveyed premises: ±463,039 sq. ft. (f10.63 acres). ' ;\;�?;; \ \ \ \ \ gzZz48 e9o�a`t/ / 30 2 \ i N 6. The surveyed premises has access to Chelsea Road (a public road). Access to Interstate 94 and C.S.A.H. No. 18 from the surveyed property is restricted. ^I , A \ \ \ \ \ter\ \ 60,484 S.F. /T �44; 7. No zoning endorsement letter was provided to the surveyor at the time of the survey, however, a search of the City of Monticello's website indicates the surveyed ^I ° \ \ \ \ ; rycy% / Q �� \ \ ,^ \ BLOCK 1 fog property is currently zoned IBC. For additional information regarding zoning and setbacks, contact the Development and Planning Department at the City of /\ Y �; `; \ y `�/� / Monticello. TI�I�YgcFgN \ Fq o 58,824 S.F. \ 231 s\ sFMFNT 8. No buildings were observed on the surveyed property at the time of the survey. o \ 4 9. No parking stalls were observed on the surveyed property at the time of the survey. / Z.$ \ \ \\ \) , \• q nt se ,N8s, ti I\9\ \`\ moo.' \ \ 2 v ty \ 10. Above ground utilities have been field located as shown. Underground utilities shown hereon are those which were field marked by utility companies responding to \ \ '''e,, ,\ \ ----- C 2s> \i t 27,876 S.F. Gopher State One Call, Ticket No. 231780466 & 231780467, dated 7/05/2023 or were taken from utility plans provided by the City of Moniticello. All underground / \ \ \ '�� t o Nw \ locations shown hereon are APPROXIMATE. Prior to any excavations or digging, contact Gopher State One Call for an on -site location (651-454-0002). However, / \ C \ \ \ \ \ `S�,q �� \\ �,� '�' lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely, and reliably depicted. In addition, Gopher State One Call locate / �, 9(9 y�� and other similar utility locate requests from surveyors may be ignored or result in an incomplete response. Where additional or more detailed information is ��\ Z�jo S� �, \ \ \ Ow No I SEE DETAIL Os, q / 88 \ O \ i/ ' \ A den SS. o\Z2 \ required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. ` \ ` 8�\ 03,, /�� s \ �No F�\ , ^ dares tso 240• (S63o�, S v \�,8 .� 43,209 S.F. a, \ 6' 6' �Z �) ^I \ " , 1 s 0na8$? 000010 11. Subsurface and environmental conditions were not examined or considered during the process of this survey. No statement is made concerning the existence of $s63s `S O Z'Z \oSo.t� \ 9gea Fo \� \\ ~' �TgINq ry underground or overhead containers or facilities that may affect the use or development of the surveyed premises. \sF S o\ \ \ \\ \ -,q 39,29 \Oesc� S g2 i oR \ ` -' /i i \ \ \\�89 \ M11, i Orai� $ S 4�Z6'�0Fort \/ \ UTIgINq \ Y' '-^ • \\ \ ' eas a9 12. Title Commitment File Number 67553, dated June 9, 2023 at 8:00 AM, prepared by Guaranty Commercial Title, Inc., as issuing agent for Old Republic National Title \ (s63o6q°s629 fig, O cOOher/ \ �I� sFgN \ i��' �'r= \ \ g \ \ / No q`�e,,eta,,o, Insurance Company, Schedule B, Part II survey related items are shown hereon. \ \ \ 3SFoe �� '=�:�� , \�\ Ro �� RjGyo fear \ �gSFn,FNT \ \ Y\a 3 Sf''gos�4(O Z�4�sI sc aq O ce/ 3 \ \ 2 \ e9 8 ,; II \4( J�\, \ \ Iq \ \ \ ) \ . C/F •'• %' per tvo y a Q F �'9 y p W I \ \ j \ \\6 0 \ o n R \ \ \ e enter t=t, c4� 4tj/y �qi� �1T Zgs \ \ Os, \\\\ \ \ ase�eiiof eat Noy ease o, Ss o \ \ \ 03 ,, R \ \ \ ht,0 roach ; j r 3�9Z meh i 4c \ \ c ea aawa %•J; \ \ I hereby certify that this survey, plan \ \ o°C6�yana \ ± r� 44 \�� 2 6'22 \ \ \ \ \ No 3`ne ana4 r or report was prepared b me or under \ e"tNoity `,1 3 0 i ^ ,9Z44 erOo P p p Y \ 3> \ .� \ ti — — c4 my direct supervision and that I am a \ \ 9r44 r,4•," \\\ 225.3 __� —25.9-;�/ C' Al. t 2 "' duly Registered Land Surveyor under .00 R-147 4 \ , •�4 �jg �'S3 \ o Em Gm BUD SONthe laws of the State of Minnesota. \ \ \ � � C 0_08046'38" '�, �,�j�'308 ¢01,00�-_, EST. 1977 ,��'� � \ \ BRC.L 573�31 49 "E o / / CL 314�g38 �' Professional Land Surveyors \ \ 225,12 DRAWN BY: KCM JOB NO: 231196PP I DATE: 1/05/2024 z�s 1� \\�� Kevin C. McCain / 6776 Lake Drive N E Suite 110 \ \ \ CHECK BY: KCM FIELD CREW: DT/CT WWW.egrUd.COm 7 Date: 1/05/2024 License No. 58542 \ / Lino Lakes, MN 55014 \ \ \ , 3 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY S:\RUD\CAD\23PROJ\231196PP\PRELIMINARY\231196PP-PRELIMINARY PLAT.DWG VICINITY MAP SEC. 13, TWP. 121, RNG. 25 0 ° o F� G r o�O W z� Ill Q 0 z z z w LL SCHOOL BLVD 0 C �G z Q L WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) Of v"thw ' e I te, ester No i . 94 rn /y r/9h es fate t of n'Onc, /Y,. tv, 8 \ 80,506 S.F. W 40 Z W a/m a� .. i� n I r- QIn w Q E a�i E o (;° E - I I I\ I H- ( LLI O Q�� M U CD v �_ \ z < a, o .-I _oa° ' U �o 10 F- \ 20$ _j o s W 8\ I 0 D w U U Ib ^'iz \ o Z0G O t M .=C `• n� > 53.81 W D O:i I 1 S.F. 44; Z O /y �M / N N/ / Q tc/� �I L U s In o " Oc 4�eht 47,172 S.F. ,; 40 (n2'z 'I _ p J r�1� I = roz. A / �� 4 10-�6 - � ' ... \/ w ' • -�-- 3.59 N 1 000 55 "E O Q 1-96.6 _ C u\ IV t ----- .?,L, ••.. N89°09'34"E _,: E a m a — — — — — / N � � ° Cy N N N C Roadway and utility I �' CD U' a°3v3 :F y r easement per Document- --' z No. 379144 — 231196PP PROPOSED FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT OF: Q VICINITY MAP LEGEND BIG RIVER 445SEC. 13, TWP. 121, RNG. 25 Q DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE Northwest corner of the v v v MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS NO. 58542 v v v Q DENOTES SET PKNAIL Northwest quarter of Section 13, \ DENOTES WRIGHT COUNTY SECTION MONUMENT o� /IV Township 121, Range 25 v �J�� —o o DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS, AS NOTED I Sr�rF G \ • ; �; DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS, AS NOTED Y/ o ti qr td et /, c , O \ - S o \ \ Q C11 OF d Cess A q° z w \ f Ni a \ �dt ID otc9Ure � ,y � � w \ e ° s a � a � � DRAINAGE AND UTILITY Q \ \ \ Q cU�enp oF; a� the ; - EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: \ �8� z \ \ ZS'9 0 0 JAIi i f r \ � SC-OOL B_VD w N O ,'� 1 �i I �, % .i \\ `Y�-J----------- O oYn� �w Q G W 'y 3 N !] \\ O�3 J z V oo� o c m Qo \\\ 8g� 3�,,L} 5 1 5 r` 0 v z p r, O \ �92 �� ,r BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND AD30INING RIGHT OF WAY L cn o w N J z \ \O\ Q LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. --- O v- o WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA °' p Qj 4 \ \ (NOT TO SCALE) \ canco 3 a... ,,jV• \ Q Ce o \ 9q Shot teihht °f v \ \ \ Q nU�e 9e�dy y \ \ OUTLOT A00, \ \ \ Q / ZS / UTI�I'vgGF \ \ S10 \ \ \ /ZS� MF \\\�\ \ \\\ 40Ln 00 O \\ G�� LL NZ \\\\\ \ \\\\ I \\I o4 Q� \ \ \ o\ m3 Q \ \ \ M 6 ° a) \ \ i M 0 E �\ 15 m2� \\\ \ \ \\ aN n v u �)15 \ N \\ \ \\ I� o uo \ 640 \ \ \ 01 vQ p�+°� \ p° ASS\ v o p p U AO \\\ \`\� \\\ IN N C a..+ fps O 0_1cu }+ U1 O ' a eds and • \ i " \ I O g �eryt na9e \ �' 64 °SS \ \ \ \ \ o \ \ ROaaw S /' i r04js r 0°� a Oki \ Z�Z•8S \ o ,oer ay �,q \ \ I y 2 //27 ty 1 I \ \ w d en \ \ \ OocU�e Utr/,ty,�%O,�O \ \\ ^ \ t \ �� RgIN \ \ Y) \ W \ ; PROPOSED PARCEL DESCRIPTION \ t�° 3�9e?ie�t ec)s\ �� \ \ TII�FgSgNO \ \ ti ` I "640 , _ \� \ 00�—_ M'M w \ (66, 5 6' 144 \ ----SEE DETAIL SFN4, \ \ \ lS6g°SS Zp SOO,, N o ° i` a `-' That part of Lot 17, Auditors Subdivision No. One, Wright County, Minnesota, lying West of Wright County Highway Right of 63° eS s \ \\ \ sr o°„ 63 - Wa Plat Number 55 lying southwesterly of the southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Highway No. 94 lying \ 3�3��5'' / \\ \ \�' `� \ 293 31 F^ 8 z U Y Y 9 Y Y 9 Y 9 Y Y 9 F.Oes \ \\ S6 \ A p \ IS89°59'45"W ' O northeasterly of the following described line: \ c.� I \\ 4°S \ h w ! 53.76 = ' - `J Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 4� \ \\ \ \ 2� B L O C K 1 r0� / oa minutes 38 seconds West along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of (ss o6gol6�g\ 0 1\ \ \ \\ \ / Z° z =11 `1- �.� beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 4016.29 3235 °s,F feet; thence southeasterly 196.62 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 437.39 F.Oesc) / ��`\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ // // LLJ O feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds; thence Easterly tangent to said curve, 100.00 feet to a3�9 \ \ \ \\ \ \ / LL U _ point on the East line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, distant 102.25 feet North / \ \ \� �� 8j \ \ \ \\ \ 2 of the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said centerline there terminating. T \ \ ; • , sip \ \ \\ \ ro~ ° ° O / dse Arai \ \ i, ryti tih / h 00/ Cl) of O rn� NO, 'ne nd \ _�4(o t3 \\ `� rV � Q L •_ o-� And lying southeasterly of the following described line and its northeasterly and southwesterly extensions: / ; g110 tpe9edr)a \ \' ; \ \ �S�,�O \\� \ \ _ / �ry °O / ^ = z 4�52 O°C4� ti//t \ `- \,' \--; ' \ s%', \ - \ /� r� / _ O N° c f6 ' -- Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 14 minutes 38 seconds West alongthe West line of said Northwest (quarter, a distance of 708.88 feet to the point of I\ \ \\ \ \ �y,% "` \ \ \\ er hd9e o Q , / \ \\ O \ \ \\OOC4 d/?a \ O / 1 I 40 O c� 01 � beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 3971.28 feet \ o \ \ C " ` \ \ \, _ \ \ \ S64os \dent 4t'//t \ o� / j � ` to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 26 degrees 27 minutes 30 seconds East a distance /", �\\ \ ;,'� , ' Y; \ sos„\\ No ye%as \ °° / / �, "'' of 530.28 feet to the southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Highway No. 94 and said line there terminating. I �r33z �� \\ O�\Oti`' Q ° �-- \\ • r♦ r♦ • i r- -- 1164 Z 4 SS S \ \\ \ \ `' c r r �i - \ \ \ ' 1 /Z / / iyr _ 6'y O 10 � \ \ \ y%�� O --� �\ \ 1iT�So r-� \ \ \ \ \� 6 g8 / o n'O• eds `O O \ r v \ \Q N / 9 00 GRAPHIC ,S'\I,E \ �63� �s'O � � � Ssos � <`, °30 �1 (IN FEET) SF s'� I \ - �_ 'OR, \ CB 08 6 3 71•- 50 0 25 50 100 \ \ �e c,\ ' q \ \ G' ' ` I , \ - , R , 4 -8,, 0 I \ \ (S63 I SS 29 \ Sig sot %o \ Co N er/y /i '� \\ Fq 0 2 \ \ \ C L 22531 \ \ 235 S'F`\ i�`s�'' \ TYRIneOf \\� NF'yT \ \ 12 --7---------- 1 INCH = 50 FEET \ \Oes�) \Ly,'•• Roaa�d F/TOF r°e/3 S64oS\ — — — — Ceht \ t 'per0° Ud nO Uti/i �gyp� �IGyT SOS,F \ \ \ \ \ �\ Z96 6 \�5°45'22 " \ i • -`" ,� o Ln ea er/J d '77e t /l/ ' �� 2 For the purposes of this plat, the West line of the Northwest \ �e/t 01, \ No 3ase?i SS 600 \ '�Roddw 437,39 a� CL a the have a bearing of South 00 degreesion 13, Township 121, a07 minutes 52 e 25 is assumed J \ \ per0 caWdyan �9Zg4 fit\\ \\` ' 4,00°06 2 \ \ \ / perOoCUmd UtilitQuarter of y l — - - — - 100.04 seconds West. \ \ �ehtNOUt///ty .yp;~`. \\ o' 2.�3 2„ \o \ enrNO 3j9e�ent /� Not Tangent (100 00 Desc.) 1 U) aN \ 3>9 \ \ G N89009'34"E 0 m R 7 •00 / ------ �z 3 it \ C i=08148°38„ \\/ — --t Ln o�� N U w NORTH �fu e \ \ z25' ` �� \ \ / Vn a Ln 110 Em Go R n1as in \ \ EST.197 Professional Land Surveyors I I -------z- ,� s �1 \ \\ g65 b06 ,96` \ 4 °e 1 REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING BILLBOARD & ELECTRICAL n BILLBOARD. SALVAGE E SERVICE \ \ \ \s \ L� ELECTRIC SERVICE \ \\ \ \\ / FOR NEW BILLBOARD. �° \ 1 \ I EXISTING ZONING A-0 1 /61 EXISTING ZONING 6O i B-2 \ I \ \ \ \\ \\ - EXISTINGZONING BI \ I I \ \\ \\ ` \ \ I �� \ s� 1 / 1 \ \ 5 0.0 \ \ PROTECT EXISTING \ UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION (TYP) \ mry/.gdae O \/(cj�// SAWCUT &REMOVE y° BITUMINOUS TRAIL FOR 1 DRIVEWAY CONNECTION \ SAWCUT & REMOVE 1 PROTECT EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL FOR /;UTILITIES DURING DRIVEWAY CONNECTION UCONSTRUCTION (TYP) / uf= u'fo ufo ufo d ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo — ufo — o — —uio — �fi�= =f� — ufo— — Ufa — =[r1a — ufc — �f� ufo— — �o �a€i— ��..� u;o — —u l ufo -- — ufo— =� o '\ \" /\�4 /77/ -----77; —_---------1------I- ___-______ J° \ -I _--- -- — — — — — — L _ — _ ii -- -- --- ------ --i — _ __� —— — -.-� _ _ _ — — Ifo_ --fo _yfs ufo ufo _ _ ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo fo —+ u� ufo ufo of ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo u ---ufo m Sfo — u -- ufo----u€�'--ti`�a ——r+,`o- — —ufo — — --ufo — —ufo--- --18f 'p 4 / _— -- lyi -- -- -- --- -- --7Mv(, —---��1 — ----V -- _-- __ ^,_95 g48 I---- �—_770.90 IM 424a DI_ \—� 30"RCP � \�__to l�-------- -- -- — --,�i /�fI vb—e -- --- -- PVC !� --- 30'0.CP \ --n `948.8�--- -- — ------ --- --jj---5 V — �—-- --- — —--- --» > » ° �ii�l/9 Rim= 1.25)=950 ^ 21" RCP ��_ _ \\�p _/�� paG/ �� GG 4 3��RCpI �Inv=941.2FRCP----------------------------�—�>--->�--->>— -- >>---->�——>>>---��-- >> D�---� \ \---�-- S---10'PVC I^Inv=943.0________3__________________- � ueIm=956.4Inv(N)=9509 — U2 _Y—Ile Ile ue Ile Ile Ile ` Ile Ile Ile Ue ue �CInv(E) 995.]U„ - UC U.UUc: UE I'EInv(5)=9511Rim=9581 In'vn(N)57.4 3Inv(N)=950.] Inv(Ej=948.1 Inv(E)=949SAWCUT & REMOVE Inv(5)=953.4CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER p�n'g0SAWCUT & REMn"NEI'9g' l \ o FOR DRIVEWAY CONNECTION I EXISTING ZONING 5, \ / CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER R-1 FOR DRIVEWAY CONNECTION / I LEGEND I EXISTING L--------- J F L---------J ue ug ufo ohu SEE SURVEY I 960 — — 958 — — I BENCHMARK I PROPOSED -- PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE F BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT F CONCRETE PAVEMENT CURB LINE AS NOTED SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STORM SEWER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS UNDERGROUND FIBER OVERHEAD UTILITY SANITARY MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE STORM FLARED END SECTION HYDRANT GATE VALVE OTHER SYMBOLS 10'CONTOUR 2'CONTOUR MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GSID STATION #85903, NAMED 8680 BE ELEVATION: 969.17 (NAVD 88) I REMOVAL PLAN NOTES I 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE LOCATION, DEPTH AND TYPES OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TO NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 2. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, APPURTENANCES AND STRUCTURES NOT INDICATED FOR REMOVAL. DAMAGE CAUSED BY DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 3. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE/RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES AS NECESSARY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THESE ACTIVITIES WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE REMOVALS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND SHALL CONFORM/ADHERE TO ALL GOVERNING STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. ALL PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 5. ALL SAWCUTS SHALL BE FULL -DEPTH CUTS. 6. ALL WORK WITHIN THE ADJACENT STREET RIGHTS OF WAY MUST BE COORDINATED WITH AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. I EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES I 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS BASED ON ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED BY E.G. RUD & SONS, INC. DATED 7/21/23. 0 25 50 100 < SCALE IN FEET > CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Know what's below. Call before you dig. co 1`O uM) U L Z U 0 O Z 00 LL U U O H � LU — LU LQ �LQ ~ N N Z p Z I- = N W > �o Ln 0, J LU w H I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: , o- DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 N 00 0 0 Q 0 LU N N U) Z 0 LU LU Z O CV cm 4 L6 116 r_: Ln N V LO J LU_ . Cn Ln N LI) N Lu Ln Z Q 2 O LLI U z Z y — W LU LU 0 0 W Z 0 Z C) Z a J y J � CC LLJ a o LU OJ CD O LU Z y R 2 CD m L) O 2 LLI SHEET NUMBER i I I 29 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 � INTERSTATE 94 FUTURE BUILDING M LOT 7 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED T i PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE _._._._.r~.-- - - \ \ BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT `------------ , g- ' ; CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK \ ` \A '\ '\ \ \ l______________________ CURB LINE �� SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN \'\ ` '\ \\--»---»---» STORM SEWER r 1 \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ ue UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC i ❑E FUTURE \ \ \ y BUILDING u9 UNDERGROUND GAS I % \ \ \ ufo UNDERGROUND FIBER w u ohu OVERHEAD UTILITY L J \„\ o\\ \ \\ \\ SEE SURVEY OTHER SYMBOLS \w \ o l , ° �l 1 LOT 8 \ , \ \ °\,\ \ \ \ I BENCHMARK MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GSID STATION #85903, NAMED 8680 BE \ ELEVATION: 969.17 (NAVD 88) �� ✓ b\ I \ KEYNOTES 15 27 I 27 15 11 12 s 15 \� \ % \ >\ \ \ \ \,\ SEE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL SITE PLAN NOTES. u' 12 22 23 5 q sg' w o 25 g ,y61 ;\` \ ,AA \ \\ 1O. LANDSCAPE AREA. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN. \y 9 114, � 'Aios 5h 414 \2. MATCH EXISTING CURB/SIDEWALK/PAVEMENT. 050 12 5 G33. 4" CONCRETE WALK/PATIO. 24 � ej'I ,n 3 24 p 16 r - 1 1 r _ 23 16 1 12 LLJ1 LLJ1 a= I PROPOSED \ \ \ 4. CONCRETE PAVEMENT/APRON. z3 z7 10 - R4 10 BUILDING Rzo zo zo za 1 5. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES. 6 oar 1 15 3 s zo h s \ r\, v10 v 7 c O R3a \ \ ``, \ 6. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP, NO TRUNCATED DOMES. 1411 \ \ \ \ I I I 1 1 4 R3p R4 11 � 19 L 0 T 5 L 0 T 3 14 E 1s rvP E 2s \ \ \ J\\` \ �L \ 7. FLUSH CURB, SEE GRADING PLAN. o ' e 15 1 � � �° .°�• I1� °� 18 i/'S \\ � \� \Q \\Ja \ %`�� \\ \\ 8. 6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. 15 10 T,P 17 \ \ \ 9. TRASH ENCLOSURE. FUTURE �347 - TYP L 0 T 1 BUILDING LOT 4 y 3.2 13 24 zo zo 24 6.7f \\ \ \ T \ 10. 4" SOLID WHITE LINE. PROPOSED 1 i \ , JJ\\ \ \ 11. SOLID WHITE PAVEMENT MARKING. n I FUTURE z nz ° m BUILDING 11 10 /p \ \ `_ -il Jy \ 10 u u BUILDING 0 ^ TYP TYP % \\J \ 12. SOLID WHITE CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKINGS. FUTURE / 3 \ Y J\ �\ BUILDING \� / �� 4 / \ .'OE 13. SOLID YELLOW TURN LANE STRIPING. REMOVE CONFLICTING STRIPING. 14. TRANSFORM PAD. FINAL LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED BY CONTRACTOR AND ELECTRIC PROVIDER. 12 _14-1 23 12 14-11- 0 1 O / __ \ s° %� J 30 �� L 0 T 2 , 9s 1z _ / -/' k \ SJ/ \ 15. LIGHT POLE AND BASE. a � y q - ° � e is o as \ \ S 15 Y \ 6 / -'-'__ '�_ , \ 16. CLEARANCE/HEIGHT RESTRICTION BAR PER TENANT. 2 A - -- _---�._----------- --- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L r 1 --- -____� / ° �_-- �' \ ,----- - �� ° _ , �_,, --b -----� -- --- - b t , -- 11--- _ --" 17. PRE MENU BOARD PER TENANT. . 2 ---- --- i Y - - __ -------- Al) 18. DRIVE-THRU ORDER SCREEN WITH CANOPY PER TENANT. ---------��----------------- --- _ ------ -- - --- ---_-_--- - ----.r- ----------------------- ,------- - - ° - -- -- - - - - b - ° - °r - ° ro - - °b - - - - - ------ b b - °r° - °ro - °r° - ° - ° ° - - �- - d ------ _ _ _ - ° o ° - -- , ° - ! °r° - °b - °,° ---------h--------- b - °,° - . °�--------- -------------------------------------- -- -------------------- ----------- _ r� -- --_-- 9 ORDER MENU PER TENANT ° ° V - - °r° - ° - - V b________________________________ _ __� v o p - so \ 1 __ __ _____ _ _ __ ___ __________ ____ ___ _ - ___-___-__ ___ V ° . •e ___________________- __ _________ ' _________________________________________ _ __ _ ___ ____________ - __ __ _ - - _ _ ` r sr ° -- ur° a -� ° ��---------------I------I-------------------------------------------I-- --li----------I---- -- ------I--- -I----------------------------------I----------1. = = +s==_----I-- \ - of �� -I� _ =i = _�=fi==--------li ' _; \ 20. 4 FT. MAINTENANCE FREE PRIVACY FENCE, COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING. Y D --» --» --» D -- - >---»---»---»---»---»----»---> - >---> ->---»---» D -» --» --» - _» r => _�» __>-->r- °>r-� r -�» --»- 21. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE PER CITY PLATE 5008. , 22 CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY PLATE 5009 I �l \ I-----------'------------------------------i=--------------------------------------------------------------------------------�I-----'------------- - -- - - - - --------------- - - ----- ----------------------------------------- ------ --------=_________ ________________ ---------------------'------- � 13-------- - CHELSEA ROAD W ______-'� --- -- - -- ' __-`-`<�-_< - '\' i 23. 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY PLATE 5012. 24. 24" HIGH CONCRETE SEAT WALL. \\ \\ \\ 25. LOOP DETECTOR PER TENANT. \ � \ SITE PLAN NOTES SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES I I SIGN SCHEDULE I I SETBACKS 26. MONUMENT SIGN. 27. CONCEPTUAL MONUMENT SIGN. 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB AND OUTSIDE FACE OF 1. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED 18" MINIMUM BEHIND BACK OF CURB OA STOP SIGN W/STREET SIGN: R1-1 (30" X 30") SETBACKS ARE BASED ON B-4 ZONING STANDARDS AND ARE AS FOLLOWS: 28. SHARED MONUMENT SIGN. BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. B. STOP SIGN: RI -1 (24" X 24") BUILDING SETBACKS 29. SHARED PYLON SIGN. 2. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE HARDWARE, POST, FOOTING, CASING, AND ALL APPURTENANCES REQUIRED FOR TYPICAL INSTALLATION. C. HANDICAP PARKING SIGN ON: R7-8m W/R7-8b (12" X 18") FRONT: 6 FT. 3. TYPICAL PARKING STALLS ARE TX 18. 6" CONCRETE BOLLARD INTERIOR SIDE: 6 FT. 3. PARKING LOT STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE 4" SOLID STREET SIDE: 6 FT. 4. ALL PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL MEET CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. WHITE PAINT. ALL PAVEMENT LETTERING SHALL BE 12" HEIGHT. D. NO PARKING SIGN ON: R8-3a (12" X 18") REAR: 6 FT. 6" CONCRETE BOLLARD 5. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN IN THE PLANS, CONTRACTOR SHALL 4. ALL SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE PER THE LATEST PARKING SETBACKS PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS AND EXPANSION JOINTS IN SLAB ON EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL E. MOBILE ORDER PICKUP SIGN: PER TENANT GRADE, SIDEWALKS, AND DRIVES PER THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: DEVICES (MMUTCD). ON 6" CONCRETE BOLLARD FRONT: 6 FT. INTERIOR SIDE: 6 FT. (ZERO SETBACK WITHIN SHARED PARKING/DRIVE) CONTROL JOINTS: WALKS @ 8' SPACING F. DIGITAL ORDER PICKUP SIGN: PER TENANT STREET SIDE: 6 FT. (ZERO SETBACK WITHIN SHARED PARKING/DRIVE) OTHERS @ 10' SPACING SITE DATA REAR: 6 FT. G. THANK YOU/EXIT SIGN: PER TENANT SAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS MINIMUM %4 CONCRETE THICKNESS. LAND USE DESIGNATION: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL H. BARRICADE SIGN: X4-11 (18" X 18") w I I I I I I I I I I I I FUTURE BUILDING LOT 6 I I I I I I I I , I I � I I i EXPANSION JOINTS: WALKS @ 24 SPACING OTHERS @ 40' SPACING EXISTING ZONING: B-2 LIMITED BUSINESS PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINT AT ALL POINTS WHERE A CHANGE PROPOSED ZONING: PUD, B-4 REGIONAL BUSINESS IN PAVEMENT THICKNESS OCCURS AND WHERE NEW PAVEMENT WILL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT. PARCEL AREA: 10.00 ACRES DOWEL ALL EXPANSION JOINTS AT 24" SPACING MAX. LOT DATA PARKING SPACES LOT USE AREA (ACRE) AREA (SF) BUILDING AREA (SF) IMPERVIOUS AREA PERCENT PARKING SPACES PER 1,000 SF (SF) IMPERVIOUS BUILDING AREA 1 STARBUCKS 1.08 47,171 2,453 22,845 48% 27 11 2 CHIPOTLE 0.90 39,291 2,371 28,387 72% 24 10 3 TBD - BANK 0.99 43,209 3,292 30,091 70% 29 9 4 TBD - OIL CHANGE 0.64 27,876 2,092 20,406 73% 10 5 5 TBD - CARWASH 1.35 58,824 4,456 43,750 74% 21 5 6 TBD - TIRE SHOP 1.80 78,241 10,651 57,224 73% 34 3 7 TBD - RESTAURANT 1.39 60,484 3,719 32,844 54% 44 12 8 TBD - RESTAURANT 1.85 80,506 5,341 52,839 66% 70 13 TOTALS 10.00 435,602 34,375 288,386 66% 259 8 0 25 50 100 < SCALE IN FEET > CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Know what's below. Call before you dig. m (' � o LI) U N z0 U W o0 0 Z 00 LL U U w - LO U � � � N N OO cy) Z I_ = N W >L0 E) ON J � W w_.rJ�L r I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: , oK DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 H m N 00 O 0 Lii F- LU N N U) Z _O N w = � N m 4 L6 r-: w Z O Ln N V Ln J � J :DM . Cn -qt N L0 N W Ln Z a 5 O W Q U z Z y _ a in W W _ LL 0 CD �D a L0 O a� a W I LiJ �z w > w o r > O ''^^ V m J W F_ Z O 2 SHEET NUMBER C2.1 N O —� x------- — — — — — — — .... .... .- 0 15 30 60 ° \ \ LL/ \ \ < SCALE IN FEET > J \ \ \ FUTURE BUILDING 0 FUTURE BUILDING j j 1// ° I I / LOT 7 LOT 8 � \ %li° \ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ 1 \ \ \ ° \ \ \ \J \s �\ \\\\ \ \\ \\ % 1 ` `\N \ L 27 1 5 15 1 15 I 27 / 15 11 12 C, \ \\ s N 28 \ \ �zG s o 12 22 23 5 x 25 g ,L61 \\\ \ ' \ °23 \\ A� \ 23 p ,Q 1 ^o B ° __ ° 4 v� v � v 1 ��O 5 5 o 5 �^ o� 5 I � 14 \ \ l \\ \ \ / Lo un 24 O 1 s �Y \ 1 27 23 14 16 10 26 O 2 24 °" PROPOSED 1 I p 1 R4 BUILDING \ \ \\\ 20 / 20 �� 24� 18 w 11 0 ° 1 g 5 20 \ \ % D ` s a 15 1 R� \ \ FAO 12.7 7 \ O Rag R50 \ \\\ \ s° \ \ J\\\ \ R3 R4 11 � 42.6 _ a 19 0 14 m 9 16 F TYP �I 25 ° a° \ \ ''o 1 L 0 T 3 N ° 4 15 E / 1 c», / \ \ ° \\ \ L N ° o� 18 / 15 8 / \ ` ` / \\\\ LLB \ 1 ° ° \\\ / 4 ° 10 3 17 // \ \ hI, TYP r \ '\ =1 34.7 TYP L O T 1 8 / ` l° I LOT 4 \\\\� i &2 24 20 20 24 f 18 6.7 23 PROPOSED 7 n FUTURE Q ° BUILDING 11 12 12 11\\ BUILDING TYP TYP FUTURE 10 $ ° U- 1 I 1 -�' \\\�7 BUILDING 4 1 I \ ° f �a ° ' ° / C N 15 12 14 16 ° /' ON, v /\ \ �30 �3o L O T 2 O � 12 s 16 - -- ----} T fo fo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo __ufo �o ufo uTo ufo ufo ufo ufo u-fo v 2 G — — — — — o ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo + ufo u o u ------------------- U ________________________-- -------------------------------------------- -J------------ v I I —»�--»--->>--->> r >---»---»---»---»---»-- »—v » --»-- —�— — n I v I I A I 13 ue ue ue uk: — ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue uei uqI ue ue L I ul I ufo u o -ufa ufis ufa— ufo��fo vfo ufa--�Taf6— ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo _9_ --ufo ufo--------===--- A. / /// _ — V 21 15 2 a I ___--- I _ --- _—___ / _ — _=�i, a \ \ � 4 a ,, /�� _— _ _ a U° 4 / _ / 7 ---ems �f° fe —afo-- a%— ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo a —uf-o-- ufo ufo —___+ _ a I I Q\ V _- _J��---- v __--- a v 5 5_____________ 4a a a�— /� \ I so \ \ -------------------------------------- I -------------------- -------------------- _---- >>--->>--->>--- DD-- _ rz ------------- n _--- -------- ----- ---- CHELSEA ROAD W ________ _-____ --�--_�-_____ / �z M 0 � umj U Lo 0 N Z U z 2 wY o =O Z Y O LL U U / ~ w — L 2fl N N N Z O oM z I� Of N >� ElONJ — w W I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: �o e DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 N 00 0 0 Lu Q 0 w N O Z O w o' w z O N m 'T Sri 1.0 I_� Lf) ♦' N V Ln J � J — L) N co N Lu Ln Z < 0 Lu Q U Z y z > = o 0 CD Q Lr) o Z J Wa H H W � W �o Lu Lu w N �o L) W z O SHEET NUMBER C2.2 O �z M --....... ....................... ..r . r...._.rrrrr.-.-.-.-.-.-._rrrrrrr_.-.-.-.-.-.-._rr.-.-.-._xxx.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-......_.-.....-.-.-.-._...._.-.-.-._...._.-.-.-.-.....-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-._........-.-.-.-.-.-._._........._.--.-�- - mom Z U nE _ w O o Z ock O O Y U U 2 LLJ w = U') ;_1 z N I N —d O � 0 15 30 60 I ] 0 z r- of FUTURE N - BUILDING = FUTUREU < SCALE IN FEET > C 1 ' BUILDING ] oo LU � I I I 1 X FUTURE / BUILDING LOT 7 LOT H <\ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, ,\l I SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS \/ PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY L — — _ DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL E . \ ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE \ SIGNATURE: �o-e DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 LOT 6 I I 1 L J } m I 27 ' 15 15 27 1 27 15 11 12 5 15 co CD 0 12 12 22 5 �= o ui 23 23 Q — -- -- -- -- — u_, n u, 23 5 �o 7 l� 5 1 5 o i �ryo 5 5 �� i 0 12 5 N g U / u> un 24 Z 2727 2727 26 T, 3 O 24 f�l C O 14 16 ° r 1 I r `� 23 14 16 10 1 12 R4 > u 23 27 u ° i /0j Q7 �N 20 20 �a 24 _ � c�i c i Sri 6 I� 0 oaa 9Qo 12.7 ��.�� 7 � � o Asir TYP � LOT 5 I LOT 3 N O ° 15 I 24 J N ch XG/ TYP Lti C'U-) = 34.7 - TYP N W � FUTURE ° LOT 4 1 / ° < z BUILDING � � 1 •a ° � aa2 1s��24��20 20��24�� Z Q% � 3 0 w ° y° U z PROPOSED 7 ° Q o v n FUTURE 11 12 12°° co BUILDING 11 10 U W BUILDING 10 �-!f TYP FUTURE TYP C CD r j 8 s1 v— \\�j0 4 BUILDING 7 A M z O 12 23 12 ° O ° v 14 16 14 16 O - 1 L 0 T 2 �1 �S 12 �o � - 0 6 ee ° .o �jO L 2 --- - N 2 A ! I 'm ufo ufo ufo ufo fo fo u fo u I luo ufo ufo o o o -u fu-fi ffo —f� ufo ufo ufo Y) � u 0 Rill a — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — U — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — vko G V N -- --- v 21 15 I _--- W 2 ------------------------------ ------ - o -- •U-------�-- ------ i - _ -- - 11 c ^ ______� JEo — __------- _— --------- _ ____---------- f f— E — -- — rt#e —v o — uTo -- ufo o u o 0 0 _--------------- ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo of u _ _ _ — — ufo ufa ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo I ffo ufo ufo ufo s �� m v — — — — o ufo ufo ufo ufo � ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo t ufo u o of —e "" — — ........................... — — — — -- — —_— _ — — ----- I W O N- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — F v — o----______ — W N- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --__________________________________________�_____________----------------------------------------- �- __�__- _ >-_--- J J ° - ------------------------------------------------------ - 1 LU r-----r-----r----- r _---�=�-v _�-=--------I--� --I I -----I --I-- I-----I-----I-----I-- I,-----I-----I-----I-----I-----I--- I -I -----I-- --11--I---- �I--------------I-----------------I- 1== -r y 0 O v v I v 5 5 �. I -- »-->>--->>--->> D -- — >--->>--->>--->>--->>---»---r»---»— >> -->>---»4�-->>-- »t�»�-->�---»---» _» _»_ --»--° --<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<-- —s— - _5��--<<---<-----�---<---c---<-- F<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<—I— < — — — < — ---<---<t--<---<---<---<---<--<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<-- -»---»---»---»---»--->>--->>--->>--->>--->>--->>—>>--->>--->>---» D _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - -------- ----I _____--______ ue ue ue o-------------------------------------------------------- I 13 C H E LS EA ROAD W ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue uk ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue u� ue ue ue ue ue ue ue up ue ue ue I I I SHEET NUMBER N w O O i i 1 1 SMH 2 RE 960.65 IE 943.88-8"SW -- _ HE 943.98-8" SE IE 943.98-8"NW HE 943.98-6" NE 22'-8" PVC @ 0.40% - HE 944.07 j(PLUG)8" PLUG ' I 8" G.V. 1 & BOX 8.. X 8.. CROSS 1 I 157'-8" PVC @ 0.40% I CB 124 RE 959.23 IE 955.23-15"SE I . 42'-15" HDPE J @ 0.40% 1 1 SMH 2 RE 960.10 IE 943.15-81'S IE 943.25-8" NE 76'-8" PVC J @ 0.40% PUBLIC DRAINAGE& UTILITY EASEMENT FOR ----- PUBLIC ANDSANITARY WATER MAIN ARYSEWER - AND i i o I vv V I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FUTURE BUILDING FIFE = ±961.5 18" RCP FES W/ TRASH GUARD IE 952.00 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ----------- ----------- EASEMENT LINE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT r° . ° CONCRETE PAVEMENT ° ---------------------- CURB LINE ---------------------- --->--->--->--->- SANITARY SEWER ----------I- WATER MAIN -- -- » - STORM SEWER ue UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC Ug UNDERGROUND GAS UfO UNDERGROUND FIBER Ohu OVERHEAD UTILITY SEE SURVEY 0 SANITARY MANHOLE i I ® 0 STORM CATCH BASIN I T 0 STORM MANHOLE I ® STORM FLARED END SECTION ---I ------------- \T. HYDRANT GATE VALVE ----------� \ a \ \ SEE SURVEY OTHER SYMBOLS � I \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ BENCHMARK MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION \\ \ \ \ \ \ GSID STATION #85903, NAMED 8680 BE ELEVATION: 969.17 (NAVD 88) a \ J\ \ a� UTILITY PLAN NOTES PLACE4.4 CV i \ �c \ ° \ \ \ \ 1. SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION RIPRAP CL. III W 18"RCP FES W/ CBMH 104 \\ \ SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE CITY'S TRASH GUARD I , STANDARD DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS AND THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING IE 9'..50 �1 I RE 957.03 \ \ , 0 PLACE 4.4 CV `i 1 \ `J; \ \ \\ CODE. IE 951.04-24"SE \ '� 23'-6" PVC @ 2.0% RIPRAP CL. III IE 951.37-18" SW LOT T 6 - IE 94 PVC @ 2.0% IE 951.54-15�/ \ l \ \ IE 944.)44 32'-18"RCP IE 946.04 �/ \ CBMH 102 � \ \ \ \ 2. A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL WATER (PLUG) 6.73 CL.S@0.70%� (PLUG) CBMH .23 \ RE 95.06- \ '\ `\\\u MAIN AND FORCEMAIN. - ^_3'-6" PVC 2.0% IE 950.06-30" S \ @ PUBLIC DRAINAGE & RE 956.23 \ QPLU. I�/T/7�ISMH 3 IE 946.78 IE 950.29-30"SEIE 950.06-30" NWj///.jCBMH 121 - UTILITY EASEMENT FOR IE 952.32-6" SW �J" ////// I'J�J" RE 958.20 (PLUG) IE 950.63-24" NW %/I RE 958.33 PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER 22'-18"HDPE@0.50% \°IE 945.48-8"NW IE 952.08-15"SW SMH 3IE 950.72-18"NE 6"X6"wvE AND WATER MAIN IE 951.06(PLUG `° ;\3. FIRE HYDRANTS AND GATE VALVES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IE 945.58-8"SE )IE 950.96-18"NE RE 956.82 ` 6 IE 952.99-15"NW IE 945.58-6"NE IE 946.24 IE 947.12-8"NW�\\ \ CITY'S REQUIREMENTS. HE 952.99-15" SW STMH 133 F 22'-15" HDPE @ 0.50% \ `�\ S \ IE 945.58-6"SW IE 947.22-4"SW `\ \ 8" X b" REDUCER PUBLIC DRAINAGE & � - RE 958.15 HE 951.65 (PLUG) 206'-24"HDPE " r IE 946.72-SUMP \ i\ \ \ \ & 6" G.V. &BOX UTILITY EASEMENT FOR IE 953.70-18" SW @ 0.20% 6" PLUG .83PUBLICSANITARYIE 953.70-18"NW - 116'-30"HDPE \ �`;\ ?i \ \\ 4. A MINIMUM OF 2.0 FEET OF VERTICAL SEPARATION SHALL BE REQUIRED 8' X b" TEE W/ � \ R959.83 AND WATER MAIN -1 6" PLUG I @ 0.20% \ ` 1 w \ 6"G.V.&BOX^ 385'-8"PVC a" -as° \ `, \ a Z \ \ FOR ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. IE 954.49-15" SE 1 A I 8" X 4" WYE @ / F BENDS i \ \ - - - 374'-8" PVC - 0.40% \ IE 954.49-15" SW 251'-15"HDPE 8" X 6" WYE 56'-18" RCP IE 946.5f @ 0.40% 6" G.V. \ 69'-30" HDPE @-- IE 945.05 CL.S@-3- -14 &BOX � � - n ---� ------ ---- �- 1 / . ' O \ @0.20% ZG� \ \ --- --ILZCEBMH122 ----------------- - - - - - - - f------\-=`I.- ------------ - i - -�-------- ----- --- ---- ,- --�-- - -I-�-------�� kAI -- _\ 5. USE SOLID -CORE, SDR-35, ASTM D3034 POLYVINYL CHORIDE (PVC) PIPE FOR \ \, �j 84'-4"PVC CBMH 101 \ \ �� \ DESIGNATED PVC STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER WITH APPROVED I I .0% �\ RE956.19 923 "S \�\ FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. @z -- �- -- -- -�� 15'-6"PVC@2.0%, \ IE 949.92-30"N ^ I I I I I I 8" PVC C900 I I I I I g' PVC C900 I I I I I 8' PVC C900 I I I I I I 18" PVC C900 I I I I J \ \ \ / r------------------------------------ --- ----- -- ------------- ---------------------- ------------------------------- _ - 9sz.3z 1 94u \y� \ 6. REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D2665 FOR SCHEDULE 40.MEET THE 2. / \ .. IE 34'-6" PVC @ 2.U% \ 92\S MP \ 1d\ \ \ \ l e7 IE 955.1 \ \\\ PVC PIPE DESIGNATED AS PVC SCHEDULE 40, SHALL 31 3 RCP 1^\ '. J _o IE 953.00 \ 30'-15"HDPE \ 8"X6" / o PROPOSED �° \ \_ ��\ \ \\ 7. ALL ROOF DRAIN DOWNSPOUT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. •1 ' y,V. 30'-18"HDPE 1BU LDING \ ILy1� CROSS n 81'-4" PVC �� 30%a F30-11?5,�DPE 'y o OX, @4.0% 50% a • %� ce 109� FIFE = 958.0 8. ALL WATER MAIN WORK AND TESTING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE V V f" G.V. & BOX/ W @ TRASH GUARD \ 30" RCP FES W/ RE 956.23 25'-6" PVC 2 0% \ 6"PLUG CBMH 105 IE 952.23-12"NE ► HE 952.07 h\ \ \ \ \ CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. e n 114'-15"HDPE n ' - \ \ &SHEET PILING '\ 1 \ 1i \ \ @ 0.50% 4T-6" PVC @ 2.0% CBMH 125 RE 957.03 n I CB 115 CLEANOUT �` ' S0'-4" PVC I \ IE 949.85 P 1 ' i1 RE 958.33 \ IE 951.46-18" NE n CLEANOUT ° SCH.40 @ 2.0% ( \ PLACE 9.9 CV c3 IE 946.07-8°c.V. CB 108 949g7 RE 955.93 951.94 \ ri \ \ 9. ALL WATER MAIN MUST HAVE A CONDUCTIVITY TEST, HYDROSTATIC TEST, (PLUG) IE 953.11-15" NE & BOX IE 951.63-15" SW RE 956.53 �'° IE 951.93-12" SW _ IE 950.50 / \ `RIPRAP CL. IV \ - \ a I I IE 95311-15"SW IE 95253-12"NW �/ ► INTERSTATE 94 FUTURE BUILDING FIFE = ±961.0 j L LOT 7 i i ❑E L J v FUTURE BUILDING FIFE = ±960.0 W V LOT 8 6"PLUG 2T-6"PVC@2.0% 96'-8"PVC AND BACTERIA TEST BEFORE THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE AND TURNED ON. 5 20'-15"HDPE @ 0.50% 4T-6'PVC @ 2.0% LOT 3 84'-15" HDPE IE 95 '75-B" S \ IE 953.52 ° 8' X 6" TEE I 2 / \ \ \ \\uJ\ // \ o.+\ _ HYDRANT W/ G.V. SCH.40 V IE 953.21 (PLUG) IE 946.52 n 21'-12" HDPE b @ 1.0% r °° ' @ .0 PVC 35'-6" PVC \ \ \ \ (PLUG) @ 0.50% n 15'-6" DIP CL.52 - 2.0% / \ @oso% % cLEANour ► @ J 3 / @2.0% \ \ \ \?, 10. FINAL BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES AND DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS SHALL BE 86'-12"PVCJ B 948.90 ., - / HE 952.83 \ \ \ f �l'J \ \ VERIFIED WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND PLUMBING PLANS. .. uq� \ B 1 SCH.40@0.50% - ° 'f 4 / \\ \ \ f \ \P m,9`'a•slzy L ��\ \ \ -I hI�I� I LOT T 1 / / \ \ / \ 4 \ \l\nls g11 5 \ 11. LOCATING WIRES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL NON-CONDUCTIVE STORM 15'-15' HDPE @ 0.50% I 2" COPPER DOMESTIC \ \ \ `€\ \ 51'RC \ SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, AND WATER LINES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE G LOT 4 / IE 952.12 (PLUG) / �4 b� 1.5" COPPER DOMESTIC T -i - 'm ' -i 1 / WATER SERVICE W/ CORP. \ \ 9q \ 1.5WATER SERVICE 9CLEAN49.76 UT / STOP&CURB STOP \ \ ` MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION (MRWA) TRACE WIRE n 43'-4" PVC 949.76 / \ 7 �`. \ i� \ 224'-18" HDPE p STOP &CURB STOP » - ° 15" RCP FES W/ / v� ��\ \'` I CBMH 106 SCH.40@2.0% »- > „ / \ ) \ 'o \ I SPECIFICATION GUIDE AND DETAILS. RE 956.43 IE 950.14 7 e. / @0.40% FUTURE CBMH 112� / TRASH GUARD /I HE 952.05-15"NE ' RE 955.95 / I IE 950.20 I BUILDING IE 952.06-15°sE PROPOSED - PLACE2.9CY \ \ ---il y 12. INSTALL METER BOX FRAME AND SOLID LID (NEENAH R 1914 A, OR 4 HE 951.16-12" SE / i I \ + - IE 951.16-12"SW / RIPRAP CL. / '' I r �r \��q \� FUTURE FIFE _ _960.5 BUILDING 117',2' C \ y\ /� i APPROVED EQUAL) OVER ALL CLEANOUTS. FIFE = 958.0 4 \ HE 951.67-12"NE / BUILDING 42'-15"HDPE _ °° SCH.40@0.60% �� / LOWER RIM TO 952.8. FIFE _ ±961.0 \ / @ 0.50% 60'-8" PVC �� 12" X 8" WVE INSTALL R-4342 CASTING. Rm 9a80 c) 1.0% v / 13. ALL WORK WITHIN THE ADJACENT STREET RIGHTS OF WAY MUST BE @ �" I HE 950.82 / (CBMH 110) / �" \,% \ /'� \ / COORDINATED WITH AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS 1 � CBMH 1 17 a / - 24'-15" RCP /� / \ �z�Hl,' / \ �� / \., �\ \ RE 956-. • CL.S 0.40% CONNECT TO EX. a IC!'-12"HDPE / �° 8"DIP WM WITH STMk. 132 osox - CBMH 111 _ /'�° , \\ DEPARTMENT. 8" G.V. &BOXRE IE 952.26-15" NW CLEANOUT ° . . o ° CONSTRUCT STMH IE 952.80-18" NW IE 952.43-15" SE ' �° / v \ 4 II RE 956.33 s\ AND 45° BENDS REPLACECASTING IE-•53.35 - cP.i OVER EX. 18"RCP STM IE 952.80-18" NE 11 IE 950.29-15" SE (FIELD VERIFY) \ SWR &CONNECT W/NEENAH R-3205 L 0 T 2 a I IE 950.46-12" NW STMH 131 - ////� 72'-12"HDPE - /," • _"'""" I 38'-18" HDPE IE 946.29-SUMP / 1 RE 960.00 0.40% M 15'-6" PVC @ 2.0% , @ D.SD% - �� _ _ _ _ ,,�'' ., q56. �. ,,\, / \�� KEYNOTES EX. IE 952..65-18 SW �0-----\\\\\\\\\\ ° HE 953.75 , _ _ PUBLIC DRAINAGE & _ PR. IE 952.65-18" SE - - _UTILITY EASEMENT FOR ,_j `°;� (FIELD VERIFY) �' ,o « -- --PUBLIC WATER MAIN ,_---i"'° - - - 1-------------- CONNECT TO EX. ---'-- ___- Y,_\' PRECAST GRAVITY GREASE INTERCEPTOR. ELEVATIONS OF GREASE ---- _ EL -r�--- ------ -- -- °>o_----"---- °-rs--- -� =°s -° °mom"m-CON EMWITH °"'ram- -�°--.,m--wa--wd-�-era--�----�i-°m--Z�-----" - -�------------ - - ---- _ _ el �° _ ___---- ° / TRAP AND PIPING TO BE CONFIRMED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. -------- ---- ---------------------------------- ryI'--- - m ml ---- B„G.v.&Box '�� '/ \ r----r------- --- \ - - ° --__---�--(FIELD VERIFY) ___Bb ----------------------------------------- CONNIE TTOEX. ----I- ----_ _---------------- ---j ._.�._.�----------------------------------------------------------------------------------uL---------- - ---- --- -- as -- ° ---- � °ro - 2. ELECTRIC SERVICE AND METER LOCATION. ro - "ro ro - - "ro ------ - - - - - ° ° - ° _ "-- - - "ro - --- -- ------------ -- �_ ---- _'_- ° �\ 8" PVC SANSWR. - "ro "ro J -4-- m "a - "ro `" °° - "m - "ro - "m - "r° - "m ° ° `" - °� CB 114 ____ _ _a1R Rim=954.8 6 �£p _, ` ° w __ ro - "ro "ro "m "m r Fr v° ro r ' + CBMH 113 ----- "m _ 9499v / " ' EX. IE ±942.7 _____________________ __________________________________________________________�_________ RE 955.93-__ RE 956.03 -__4- inv(w>= _________ _ ____________________ ] Inv S)=949.6 '�/ b (FIELD ----------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---_______= IEv. 951.67-12"NE===== HE 9s2.o3-1r'Nw-Rim=9s<.-- ,n (w=96 pY - _----_ -- ____=___-- 2 A SERVICE AND METER LOCATION. _ _ __ E --- ---- ----- - - - --- -- ____________ _ ______ ____ 1 ________________ _ _ 516712 SE _ _ ____=====A=== __�_____________ _ V R==�s=9603 inv(E)-950.2 - -i- ° ____A 3 GAS J G _-----------I--- . - ----- ----- t--------------I- - -r--------------------- ----- ---- ----- ----- -- =9s6.e -. IE 9 - Inv(w)=95a.1V _ ___- D T- _° \ 29 DIP - 't m- 5]. ( Inm= 55.6 °/ `• \ 24a °IP - i'' _� �� 9sza--------------------------I-- - II----------1- ---I-- v�=9513----------------------------------------------------I.==-=`Iza ---P------1--I �1-- -� I In (5)-9523 .............. -- 1 lnvl q40� /' hvcN)=9511 r hvc5)=961.2 ° 4 TELEPHONE/DATA SERVICE LOCATION �Inv(5)=950.9 Rim=95].6 I V .- ° ° ° p° Vi /--_____--_�- _ 36 7y I E 98 / / . i 21" RCP LL -. V _ InvlS)= 49 2]' RCP ��__i 30" RCP r RCP' ----- _ 9 36"RC � 10"PVC Inv=9419 V 30"0.CP>Y--»-__is�< \ Rlm=9561 r -<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---�- S<---<---<---<---<-----<---<---<-- S3>"��Z----<---�---� n v ; ^ / m'_9�Mo ->r-- T -` - c \TI<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<----<---<---<---<---<--I <-��\<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<��/!ice-<--in„ 9 RIm=956.3 ^ 21" RCP ->Y I _ _ _»---»---»---»---»---»---»---»---»---»---»---»-t-»---»---»---»---> D i I ^Inv=943.0 y2 ^ _. -------------- ____________________________________________________________ ___�_______ , I I- - RIm=956.4 --`_-_ i � ____ __._- 1 Al I' 'O= CHELSEA ROAD W -1- "e - - - "e - °. - °.� I Inv(5)=951 _ I _ --aim=9s].4 n Inv(N)=950.7 Inv(N)=952.3 \ \ \ Inv(E)=949 ] InvIE)=948A \ \ \ Inv(5)=953.4 STORM SEWER SCHEDULE CBMH 123 RE 959.43 L IE 955.06-15 NE IE 955.06-15" NW IE 955.06_15"SE 20.-1�@ 0.50% IE 955.16(PLUG) FU NEENAH CASTING STRUCTURE NO. SIZE OR EQUAL CBMH 101 72" DIAMETER R-3067-VB CBMH 102 72" DIAMETER R-3067-V CBMH 103 60" DIAMETER R-3067-VB CBMH 104 48" DIAMETER R-3067-VB CBMH 105 48" DIAMETER R-3067-VB CBMH 106 48" DIAMETER R-3067-VB CBMH 107 48" DIAMETER R-3067-VB CB 108 24" X 36" R-3067-VB CB 109 24" X 36" R-3067-VB CBMH 110 48" DIAMETER R-4342 CBMH 111 48" DIAMETER R-3067-VB CBMH 112 48" DIAMETER R-2573* CBMH 113 48" DIAMETER R-3067-VB CB 114 24" X 36" R-3067-VB CB 115 24" X 36" R-3067-VB \ \ STRUCTURE N0. SIZE NEENAH CASTINGOR EQUAL CBMH 121 48" DIAMETER R-3067-V CBMH 122 48" DIAMETER R-3067-V CBMH 123 48" DIAMETER R-3067-VB \ / \ \ / \ CBMH 124 48" DIAMETER R-3067-VB \\ / CBMH 125 48" DIAMETER R-3067-V \ STMH 131 STMH 132 STMH 133 y 48" DIAMETER R-1642 / \ 48" DIAMETER R-1642 / \ 48" DIAMETER R-1642 / / / / / 0 25 50 100 < SCALE IN FEET > CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Know what's below. Call before you dig. (M E9 r0 0 M LO U ,2121 N Z U W o0 0 O Z O O Y U U O � % LU w - LU L(7 2fl N N N Z p O M Z I - of N w I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: �o e DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 N 00 0 w Q w co L0 W Z O CO W 0_ - N M 1- U.) .0 I-� w z O L0 N Ln J � J coLO 0 Lf) N Lu Ln Z < p w Q U Z (n Z = LLJ CD Q Z J J LL! L0 W O Lu z_ o J M > m w U Z O SHEET NUMBER C3.1 N 0 N 0 0 -........................................... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 15 30 60 V \ \\ \\\ ° \ \ \\\ SS�JISLL/12 \\ FUTURE � J <SCALE IN FEET> ] \\ \`\\ \`\� \ \ \ o BUILDING ] FUTURE \ \ FFE _961.0 1 - BUILDING \ \ \ \ \ 1 FFE = ±960.0 - \ �6 \ y \ \ / \ V ° �, \ I / o �\ \ o 18" RCP FES W/ LOT 7 LOT 8 TRASH GUARD \ IE 952.00 PLACE 4.4 CY RIPRAP CL. III 1 \ \ \ \° 1 \ \ \ ° \ \ 18" RCP FES W/ TRASH GUARD CBMH 95 104 IE 950.50 RE 957.0E IE 951.04-24" SE \ \ \ PLACE 4.4 CY IE 951.37-18" SW RIPRAP CL. III \ r 23'-6" PVC 2.0% \ \ \\\ @ / IE 951.54-15" N \ CBMH 102 32'-18" RCP � � IE 946.04 �/ � \ CL.S 0.70% PLUG \ \ \ @ (PLUG) / ° CBMH 103 RE 956.73 \ \\\J \\ �I 1 F- 23'-6" PVC @ 2.0% RE 956.2E \XNJ PUBLIC DRAINAGE & IE 950.06 30" S s \ \ SMH 3 I IE 946.78 IE 950.29-30" SE IE 950.06-30" NW \ E \\ \ \ RE 958.20 (PLUG) UTILITY EASEMENT FOR \ O \ CBMH 121 IE 952.32 6" SW RE 958.3E PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER 22' 18" HDPE @ 0.50% IE 950.6E-24" NW v A IE 945.48-8" NW IE 952.08-15" SW SMH 3 ° ' `N IE 950.72-18" NE 8" X 6" WYE IE 951.06 (PLUG) � � \ IE 945.58-8" SE AND WATER MAIN RE 956.82 IE 952.99 15" NWA IE 945.58-6" NE IE 946.24 IE 947.12-8" NW \ STMH 133 - 22'-15" HDPE @ 0.50°i° IE 950.96-18" NE IE 952.99-15' SW IE 945.58-6" SW IE 947.22 4" SW IE 946.72 SUMP J RE 958.15 IE 951.65 (PLUG) /� � ) 206' 24" HDPE IE 953.70 18" SW 6" PLUG @ 0.20% \ ` \ 8" X 6" TEE W/ IE 953.70-18" NW 116'-30" HDPE 6' PLUG 6" G.V. & BOX I ^ I 385'-8" PVC 8" - 45° @ 0.20 /° 8" X 4" WYE 0.40% / BENDS \ \ �� 11 \ 8" X 6" WYE 56' 18" RCP 6" G.V. IE 946.56 iI IE 945.05 CL.5 @ -3.03% & BOX @ ° @ 0.2 "HDPE s° \ 84'-4" PVC CBMH 101 �< C\ -L C L Z C C t t t t C t C C C C C @ 2.0% \ \ RE 956.13 °\ A� \ IE 949.92-30" S / 15' 6" PVC 2.0°i° ' \ / r @ \ IE 949.92-30" N I I I I 8" PVC C900 I I I I I I 8" PVC C900 I I I I I I 8" PVC C900 I I I I IE 952.32 \ IE 952.13-6" NW �� _ ° •� � IE 945.92-SUMP ` o 34'-6" PVE 9 3.00 ° \° A 31'-30" RCP ° o 0- PROPOSED s°v 30'-15" HDPE 8 X 6 30'-18' HDPE > CROSS 81'-4" PVC �� 30' 15" HDPE c� \ \ \\ @ 0.40% 6�� G.V. @ 0.30°i° � @ ° .� @ 0.50°i° �' � a � � °° BUILDING 4.0 /° & BOX FFE = 958.0 8" X 6" TEE W/ CB 109 _ 30" RCP FES W/ 6" G.V. &BOX RE 956.23IE 952 23 12' NE ° E5952.07 @ 2.0% \ TRASH GUARD \\ 6" PLUG CBMH 105 ^ �J \ \ \ F- a n A &SHEET PILING \ 47-6 PVC @ 2.0% � CBMH 125 RE 957.03 / y CB 115 CLEANOUT � 50'-4" PVC J I IE 949.85 RE 958.33 IE 951.46-18" NE CLEANOUT i ° ° J \ IE 946.07 CB 108 - RE 955.93 951.94 SCH.40 @ 2.0 /° \ PLACE 9.9 CY \ J\ - 8" G.V. 949.97 IE 950.50 \ RIPRAP CL. IV \`\\ (PLUG) IE 953.11-15" NE &BOX IE 951.6E-15' SW RE 956.5E \ °° i � ° IE 951.9E-12" SW I \ \ \ IE 953.11-15" SW 1 \ \ \ 6" PLUG !'� �` IE 952.5E-12" NW 27-6" PVC @ 2.0% ° 47' 6' PVC @ 2.0/° 96'S PVC -� \ \ L ° ^ IE 952.75 8" S \ HYDRANT W/ G.V. u l n ` a • ' \ IE 953.21 (PLUG) 21'-12' HDPE .o ° 0 « j ° 2 V ° �v / - 20'-15' HDPE 0.50% � ° IE 953.52 SCH.4 / IE 946.52 L 0 T 3 84' 15' HDPE 8" X 6' TEE @ 1.0°i° ° 43' 4" PVC °_ 35'-6" PVC \ ` \ 0.50% F 16-6' DIP CL.52 ° \ \ ° (PLUG) @ @ 0.50°i° ° CLEANOUT + @ 2.0%°° 3 @ 2.0% \ ° \ \ \ 86' 12" PVC 948.90 ° c � k • IE 952.83 i� \ 1 SCH.40 @ 0.50% 4 \ I I I I I I _ I I / \ o 15'-15" HDPE @ 0.50% ^ m L 0 T 1 2" COPPER DOMESTIC \ \ \\ � 15oR L/ \\\\� ^ , ° WATER SERVICE W/ CORP. \ \ \ \ ^ �cP \ L 3 \ LOT 4 / / IE 952.12 (PLUG) 4 3 2 1.5" COPPER DOMESTIC I I 1 \ -9y� I \ WATER SERVICE W/ CORP. 949ANOUT STOP &CURB STOP 43'-4" PVC _ 949.76 224' 18" HDPE �� CBMH 106 @ STOP &CURB STOP » » >? > 15" RCP FES W/ \ \\ E°, ° SCH.40 2.0°i° @ 0.40% IE 950.14 % a \ \ RE 956.4E °• / ER950. GUARD FUTURE CBMH 112 I s � I RE 955.95 J n IE 952.05-15"SE °° °° PROPOSED / � / BUILDING ; IE 951.16-12" SE / PLACE 2.9 CY BUILDING IE 951.16 12" SW 1 RIPRAP CL. III n _ 117-12" PVC R ° FFE = 958.0 ; IE 951.67 12" NE / SCH.40 @ 0.60% FUTURE - FFE _ ±960.5 / BUILDING a2'-15" HDPE 0.50% ° LOWER RIM TO 952.8. FFE _ ±961.0 \� / �° 60'-8' PVC L 12" X 8" WYE / INSTALL R-4342 CASTING. @ 1.0% $ IE 950.82 (CBMH 110) / CBMH 107 n° • 1� - 24' 15" RCP / \ ,� ED RE 956.63 ° ° CL.5 0.40% d \ \ / \ lQ REM959.00 IE 952.26-15" NW ° 102'-1@' HDPE _ /° , 0.50% o-o p I °n CBMH 111 @ °I / j CONSTRUCT STMH IE 952.80-18" NW IE 952.4E 15" SE ° CLEANOUT � g � o � RE 956.3E REPLACE CASTING 053.35 v ' IE 950.29 15" SE \OVER EX. 18" RCP STM IE 952.80 18" NE R W/ NEENAH R 3205 IE \\ U • SWR & CONNECT �� \ L 0 T 2 / IE 950.46 12" NW - 1� a IE 946.29-SUMP STMH 131 38'-18" HDPE /� /\ 72' 12" HDPE 00 / - / / \ RE 960.00 0.40°i° / Y \ 15'-6" PVC @ 2.0% @ 0.50°i° _ - _ ,9y6 / �\ \ /\ / EX. IE 952.58-18" SW �° ° o it 9 \ oo �� __ _----___- IE 953.75 1 � �- PUBLIC DRAINAGE & PR. IE 952.65-18" SE 1 0 Z� 51' / s _ FIELD VERIFY - - « - - - -PUBLIC WATER MAIN17 f° % u _�% /% / �� / v�� - - / �\ a \' /77 �>>� ^- =°�I-� CONNECT TO EX. _---- u¢° =__% / `' ,� a �� a s%� /77 fa �.f-� Ito aia uSo- ufn- ufo�fo ufo ��o u o u ufo ufo ufo u o Sffo __u, ufoo u�-a ufo .. f-:r -�f� �afo cr#a --ufo uSa ufo -�-Y ufo o ufo _ice ufo --ufo-------==----' ' i/// -/ / / 8" DIP WM WITH -��- u{ �° / ° c V rV - b°I 8"G.V.&BOX al -- --j�i-__ �a \/i4 \ a /77 i v _ ----- ---1 - (FIELD VERIFY) _--�I- ______ - - j -= a �/ °,, /7-7 ii----�--- -- UI ___ ------------------- �� _ _---- --- U -_- - - - - - ------ > P --------�- n ---,/ ;- 4---------�------ ---u�c ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo uip �-ufa-- C ufo ufo - � ufo ufo -- da // _-- o ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo_ ufo ufo ufo r= vfs°---fO- -�� -� I - - --� --_ _ V CBMH 113 CB 114 -------------- _ 18 �� Rim 954.8 � _---------------------- V V - f a Inv(`N)=949.9 --- < ��---- I __------_-- \ v----------------------------------------------------------------------- o a -------- RE 955.93 --- RE 956.03 _---__ --- pi 7 = 949.E ---- a -r ---- Rim=954 c� Inv(S)= a a �- \I // f / / ___________ _ _ ___ ___________________________________________ �____________--------- ° __ - - - - - - IE 951.67-12" NE ____ IE 952.03-12" NW Rim=954.7� Inv(N)=950.2 I V 77 ------------------------------ -- _�_= _ _ IE 951.67 12" SE Inv=950.3 Inv(E)=950.2 _--� a _-_-_- / / 1 Rim=956.8 _ Rim=955.6 nv(N/)=950-1- - __ N�====a �, / � 24" DIP -r==- / 7 D Rxm- 9418 ---I-----I-----I --I-- IITnvZTVr93�.�I-----I-----I-----I-----I--- I -----I-- I----�IInvN)=951.3.....-- -�- -- aiZ�- - - /\ M= - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ -s= - /7 . = I - I - I- I- II-- I-----I-----�-_- I---- --�„ IInv(S)=952.3 V I Inv(S)=951.2 - V I I/ a -- - _ _ _ - - - 7 / Rim=957.6 i----------=====a=- _ a a V / I 36„iG� 7 n Inu<E) g49$ V �, 21" RCP I -- V----__---- 4 a V-------------------------------- a a a a/_= _ - �7-7 27" RCP �_- 30" RCP I -- a 3MRCP - -- \ > --- ----______ � �------ / / -»36" RCP »---»---»� A \\ I n \\ ----u� --- �/ I/ / 9y�0 Infvn 941.2i- \ \\ V \ < \\ -t---t---�---<10" PVC<---<--<--<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<--�<---<---<---<---<-I---<---<---<---<---<--<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<-�C <--(�` �09� \ < \ \ \\ i A Rim=956.3 \ 10" PVC / / Inv=943.0pvc _---=�--i-----------i - --------------------r-------------------- _�\ _`--- i Rim=956.4 Inv(N)=950.9CHELSEA ROAD W I \\ / Inv E 945./ ue ue ue u[ ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue uj ue ue Inv(S)=951.1 L/ --Rim=957.4 Inv( N)=952.3 I \ \ 2n f M E9 n O Lo U N z z0 U w 0 z 00 � LL U U O w - Lo N OO z r- = N w >� ON J Lu W �- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE:' o- DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 N 00 O 0 Q w N N U) z O _N w = � N M -q Lo 'O r-: w z O II I J J L N �40' y C Ln N Lo Lu H N N LL I LLI 0 z Q ILL 0 Lf) M lzt L0 L0 z <I z_ in Lu SHEET NUMBER C3.2 a H 0 0 Lu z `z G J J w _0 F- z O ll� N 0 0 f�n M {.1 Cc)O - uMj Z W 0 0 --------------------------------------------------- ------ ----------------- 00 O Zp L U O 1 Of 2 w- - Lu N N 1 _J o 0 0 15 30 60 I FUTURE cl = L N >Lu I I 1 BUILDING FUTURE Lo .. < SCALE IN FEET> ON 1 0 i I FFE _ ±961.0 , - BUILDING w Lu E) I I I I FFE _ ±960.0 I I I I I I 1 _ I I I � 1 - L - -el i- V w V FUTURE 1 BUILDING / I FFE - ±961.5 18" RCP FES W/ I L O T 7 L O T 8 I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS TRASH GUARD I I PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY _ IE 952.00 L DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM PLACE 4.4 CY \ I A DULY LICENSED NAL ENGINEER UNDER THEP AWSSOFOTHE 1 RIPRAP CL. III 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 w 18" RCP FES W/ NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE \ TRASH GUARD CBMH 104 RE 957.03 SIGNATURE: oe IE 950.50 IE 951.04-24" SE PLACE 4.4 CY IE 951.37-18" SW DATE: 01 /08/24 LIC #: 45889 23'-6" PVC @ 2.0% L 0 T 6 RIPRAP CL. III \\\\� - 23'-6" PVC @ 2.0% IE 951.54-155\N IE IE 9 (PLUG) 32'-18" RCP I IE 946.04 / ' CL.5 @ 0.70% ' (PLUG) 1 23' 6" PVC 2.0% CBMH 103 1 / IE 946.78 @ PUBLIC DRAINAGE & RE 956.23 CBMH 121 I SMH 3 / IE 950.29 30" SE RE 958.20 (PLUG) UTILITY EASEMENT FOR IE 950.63-24" NW �J` �J PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER 22'-18" HDPE @ 0.50% RE 958.33 IE 945.48-8" NW AND WATER MAIN IE 951.06 (PLUG) IE 952.96-15" SW IE 950.72-18" NE I IE 945.58-8" SE 8' X 6" WYE IE 950.96-18" NE 6" PLUG IE 952.99-15" NW IE 946.24 - IE 945.58-6" NE I � STMH 133 - 22'-15" HDPE @ 0.50°i° I I � IE 952.99-15' SW IE 945.58-6' SW F8" X 6" REDUCER PUBLIC DRAINAGE & � J RE 958.15 IE 951.6E (PLUG) / 206'-24" HDPE & 6" G.V. & BOX UTILITY EASEMENT FOR IE 946.72-SUMP IE 953.70-18" SW 6" PLUG @ 0.20% m CBMH 122 PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER 8" X 6" TEE W/ IE 953.70-18" NW ' %- AND WATER MAIN 6' PLUG /I/ 8„ 45, 1 RE 95.49- 6" G.V. & BOX 1 ^ 1 385'-8" PVC IE 954.49 15" SE I 1 ^ .� BENDS 374'-8" PVC � 1 8' X 4" WYE @ 0.40°i° � I IE 954.49-15" SW 251'-15" HDPE @ 0.40°�° 8" X 6" WYE 56'-18' RCP 6" G.V. IE 946.56 N RE 960.65 @ 0.60% IE 945.0E CL.S @-3.03/° &BOX �/ I I r o IE 943.88 8" SW o IE IE 9 3398-8'' W C C C C C C C C C C C �C C C C C C C t t C t C C I w IE 943.98-6" NE � - -- -- -- -- -- 22' 8" PVC @ 0.40°i° I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o IE 944.07 PVC C900 8 PVC C900 8 PVC C900 8 PVC C900 (PLUG) - 4 1 ""� 8" PLUG ° °° ° o ° ° ° ° ° ° ° a + Z 30'-15" HDPE 8" X 6' 30' 18" HDPE ° c) 1 0.40°�° CROSS ° 81'-4" PVC �� 30'-15' HDPE 'y 0 O 8" G.V. o--o 1 6" G.V. @ 4.0 /° & BOX 1 �- & BOX c0 w - - 8" X 6" TEE W/ CB 109 _ Ir � N m � MID I� v I I I 6" G.V. & BOX RE 956.23 IT 8" X 8" 114'-15" HDPE 6' PLUG CBMH 105 IE 952.23-12" NE CROSS oc+ ° @ 0.50% ° CBMH 125 RE 957.03 CLEANOUT 4T 6" PVC @ 2.0% CB 115 CLEANOUT v IE 946.07 RE 958.33 _ IE 951.46-18" NE CB 108 - RE 955.93 951.94 C.) I I (PLUG) IE 953.11-15" NE & BOX IE 951.63-15" SW RE 956.53 \ 949.97 IE 951.93-12" SW 15T-8" PVC �! CBMH 123 IE 953.11 15" SW IE 952.53 12" NW �e ° y a° 96' 8" PVC V IE 953.21 PLUG 21' 12" HDPE ro PVC @ 2.0% @ 0.40% ( ) ° IE 952.7E-8" S \ HYDRANT W/ G.V. SCH.40 - RE 959.43 1 @ IE 953.52 // 6' PLUG 20'-15" HDPE @ 0.50°i° � 4T-6" PVC 2.0% n i ° 7 IE 955.06-15" NE L 0 T 5 I IE 946.52 L 0 T 3 84'-15" HDPE ° 8" X 6" TEE �_ @ 1,p°j, � CB 124 1 IE 955.06-15" NW / (PLUG) @ 0.50% @ 0.50% 15' 6" DIP CL.52 CLEANOUT Lo IE 955.06-15" SE \l W RE 959.23 86'-12" PVC 948.90 IE 955.23-15" SE 1 SCH.40 @ 0.50% - M _ 0 �a Lo I ^ -I I I I I I I� N W T 20'-15" HDPE @ 0.50% ° - IE 955.16 (PLUG) FUTURE rO \\I 15'-15" HDPE @ 0.50% "� o\ BUILDING , L 0 T 4\\\\ / / IE 952.12 (PLUG) ° 4 3 2 1.5" COPPER DOMESTIC FFE _ ±961.5 1a WATER SERVICE W/ CORP. O W Q 43' 4" PVC STOP &CURB STOP _(�}�� - )�_ y Z Z 42' 15" HDPE 1 /-J" Q p y _ ° SCH.40 @ 2.0°i° 8" - 45° BEND 224'-18" HDPE � � CBMH 106 @ 0.40% IE 950.14 7 e / @ 0.40% RE 956.43 n FUTURE IE 952.05-15" NE i, ° , °• CBMH 112 > � W v BUILDING IE 952.05-15" SE PROPOSED RE 955.9E - \ ; IE 951.16-12" SE �� 0 CD FUTURE FFE - ±960.5 '� BUILDING _ IE 951.16-12" SW A a FFE = 958.0 ; IE 951.67-12" NE BUILDING a2'-15" HDPE SMH 2 / 1 FFE - ±961.0 @ 0.50% 60'-8' PVC 1 . RE 960.10 1 \ _�� / T 1.0% IE 943.15-8" S 1 V A CBMH 107 @ 1 w IE 943.2E-8" NE 8,, \ RE 956.63 ° 0 'I a ° � AG \ 20'-6" PVC @ 2.0°i° CONNECT TO EX. STMF, 132 °, g ° ^� IE 943.25 IE 952.26-15" NW 102'-12" HDPE ° O / CC9 \ (PLUG) 8" DIP WM WITH RE 959.00 IE 952.43 15" SE ° @ 0.50% \ O 8" G.V. & BOX CLEANOUT c 76' 8" PVC O \ CONSTRUCT STMH IE 9 52.80 18 NW REPLACE CASTING IE 953.35 I `� C1 @ 0.40% \ \ 8" - 45° BEND AND 45° BENDS OVER EX. 18 RCP STM IE 952.80-18" NE W/ NEENAH R-3205 0 (FIELD VERIFY) \ SWR & CONNECT L 0 T 2 �,� a / I RE 960.00 8" HDPE ° - '1 72' 1@ 0.50HDPE m PUBLIC DRAINAGE & 1 SMH 1 \ 1 38 1@ 0.40% 15'-6" PVC @ 2.0 /° r UTILITY EASEMENT FOR I RE 960.20 8" PVC C900 EX. IE 952.58-18" SW ° IE 953.75 , PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IE 942.75-8" SW I I I I PR. IE 952.65-18" SE El _ AND WATER MAIN IE 942.85-8" N '9 (FIELD VERIFY) I }a _ ~ Q IE 942.85-6" E rtf �I a L_ - v a I��'^ a 5'-8" PVC 1.00% I o� CONN L0 0 ufo ufo -'o ufo ufo ufo u' o �"`� Sa ° ° uio� _ I ufo u o @ r ufo _ ufo fn +�fa uta ut� �af� ufo �-=s i--� ufo ufo ufo �,-o f �� o u o u� ufo ufo ufo uTo u-fo ufa ufo o i o �r-� ufo �af� �r`c uf-a -�uf� u-fa ufo ufo C ufo 8" DIP _ -- ----------------"I - _ W °7 �D ooI co u v, ----�- - ------ � �v ( GA W I Q _ v I r ^ -- / Jt _ v ------------ ---1 - FIEL[ Z ____________________ -- J------�---_-------------___ o _� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----------------�-----�CONNECTTOEX. __ ------------- --- -- �----., - fo---- t ufo "o -__ -_ _ ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo of ufo _ ifs Lrfo ufo u4G- �fe - - ufo - - - v 8 PVC SAN SWR. ufo ufo l yfo ufo ufo ufo - - - - _ _ - Z - - ufo ufo ufo ufo ucn fo ufo ufo o ufo ufo o ufo ufo ufo ufo a T� ° I rt^ o - - - - - - - - f u3e o _ --- �o� V � CBMH 113 CB 114 _ � �_��-R' , EX. IE ±942.7 V ------------------ v------------------------------------------vo------ o--------- ---- RE 955.93 - RE 956.03 •_�'5Z7 - W �Q V-------------------- q- Rfm-954.7 J 00 (FIELD VERIFY) _________________ ° __- IE 951.67-12"NE-== _ IE 952.03-12"NW Rfrn=954.7� Inv(N)=950.2 J _------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --_�_�-_°________�__�= o==--- ---------------------_-----�- ------ -- IE 951.67 12 SE In =950. In = ----- ----- ___ ___________________ Rim=955.6 v 3 nv(N1)995021 - -- -� - - �� - - - �--- 1 Rim=956.8 W T-----T ----T ---- 24"DIP T I� v-1-----1-----1--I Rim=95�.7 I-----I-----I-- I-----I-----I-----I-- IITn�ir9n_4__---I-----I-----I-----1---�-I----I-----I-----�IInv(N)=951.3 I--1-----1-----1-----1-----1-----1-----1-----{-__ _-1==_--=�r 0 I Inv(N)=951.1 IR Inv(S)-952.3 � _ _ V I Inv(S)=951.2�/� Rim=957.6 V 21" RCP i V____________ ° = W Z _ v 27" RCP �/ 30" RCP -------___ _______________ a 3nRCP 0 -»�--»---»---» D - - >--->>--->>--->>--->>---»-- >>---»- »--->>---»�u�-->>--->>---»�__»_ -»- »�-->�---»---» _» _»_ --»--_ »---�z- 2 -- -- -- -- - - -- -- __ _ Rim=958.6 I » 10" PVC Inv=941.9 I 30" RCP»---»- n �\ v A :---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<-- S<---<---<---<---v<---<---<---�5�<=-<---<------�---c---<---<---<-- <--<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<-- <---<---<---<---<n \ ---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<- n V »- - 10" Pvc 1 t 10" PVC 21" RCP - -��- - � /� Rim=956.3 ->> >>-->>--->>--->>--->>--->>--->>--->>--->>---»--»---»---»--->> D 1 I 1 1 Inv=943.0 1 �� ----- I ________________ ____=�________--- ----------------------------------- ��--------- ---�---------- Rim-956.4 Inv(N)=950.9 CHELSEA ROAD W -- --_- Inv(E)=945.7=- 1 I � ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue u ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue I ue ue ue ue ue q ue ue ue ue ue -1- ue � u� Inv(S)=951.1 1 I SHEET NUMBER ��-- Rim=958.1 Rim=957.4 I I Inv(N)=950.7 Inv(N)=952.3 C3.3 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ----------- ----------- EASEMENT LINE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT w r° . , CONCRETE PAVEMENT ° ---------------------- CURB LINE ---------------------- --->--->--->--->- SANITARY SEWER ----------I- WATER MAIN -- -- » - STORM SEWER Lie UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ug UNDERGROUND GAS ufo UNDERGROUND FIBER ohu OVERHEAD UTILITY T SEE SURVEY ° SANITARY MANHOLE O STORM CATCH BASIN INTERSTATE 94 = STORM MANHOLE _ I ® STORM FLARED END SECTION - \T.O � 'S ss.7 511 `� - T HYDRANT .560 S95 590 sds .�4 .SY4 5d2 560 .BYO 579 - � � I ? ... �........� ......� . ... ► �.�. i,ttttttttttt 1 i i i iTi i=i7 3 : r.., .It -. .. - :: .� :.... �\ E , -� \ \ ......................1...................................1111//11.:1........° ..........ii��........ GATE VALVE \ice - - - --- - - ---------- -- --,------------------------ �.. -----------.ba--- ---- ------------- --- --------- -T SEE SURVEY OTHER SYMBOLS ------------ 960 960 SILT FENCE \ S \\ \ ` ,V . E \ 1 ,\ \ \ \ ` - - 960 - - 960 10' CONTOUR (rP) - - - 958 - - - 958 2' CONTOUR O • SILT FENCED O _ o, • • a \ \ \\(50\\ �.°• v \� p \ \ SPOT ELEVATION FUTURE \\\ ; \�\ \ \ \ ------ x ------ x (CURB ELEVATIONS / l \ \ ARE TO GUTTER LINE) / .1 ^•bo°9•° BUILDING J I FUTURE .1 ,o,°o,�: I o ,\ ., \ ••••••••••••• SILT FENCE / E yo°a FFE BUILDING p \ \ FFE _ ±960.0P\�%\ \ so so so so so so RIPRAP • I I ' I"''' I; I I �/ �I / • • / 1 L ----� _ 9C. Ill V • FUTURE •I /� o \ BUILDING a-.o' 96f L o r 1 L O T s vv \\\ \ \\\ ;� \ \V BENCHMARK 1 FFE _ _961.5 INFILTRATIONBASN -:OP \\\I ' \ \ x's94` , �S\ \`\ • BUM EL = 953.7 • y y OUT EL=953.7 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • 100 YR HWL= 956.7 . w •p°° 9 / � Q ,, \ \j GSID STATION #85903, NAMED 8680 BE 1 ., • INSTALL SILT FENCE AFTER .y °y� \\ ELEVATION: 969.17 (NAND 88) LOT 6 BASIN CONSTRUCTIO(TYN ''\� \ \\�\I \�\JJ \ \ \\\ O '� �/ \ \\ �`\� GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS .I O \� 1. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF .(/ e \ � \ TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" �96b 95 �s z591`i \\\ ��\ �� \ ;i 960 \\ \ ;w\\ ��\ \\ \ AND THE CITY OF MONTICELLO SPECIFICATIONS. O - \---- J� 95e -�\/ szs'° ° \ \�� 2i+� 2. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM O • --- - ---� - - � -----_----------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ -- - - - - ---- �.- - - - - - - - - ------ _---- - -- --__--------- ; --- ----a - - - - -- i `\ TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD). `x 591 `i \ 6C3 60. 1.2% 60.0 960 -- 585 !_9� �57.2 % 57. 1.1% 57.2 �� 56.7 /, � -7� 567 06% 570 56.9 ' \\\\ \ '\ \%s \ �� \ \ • 60. 60. 60.4 58.9 N 157.6 580 57.6 57.1 L.P. 71 - B" \\ 5 (� \ .� -- -- -- -- -- -\ - --- -- -- -- -- -- -- ^ -- �� -- -- -- -- 568 s \ J G 3. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF I T\ I n I n I -- I I I I 1 i G 57.5 7.5 ~ Jdl \ 1\\ '` \' 9' ` \ \ g60 0.6% ` 0.6% 585 0.6% 969 0.6% 571 0.6% n OD 0.6% 56.4 57. �� O\ \- `\ MINNESOTA ( EA ) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. m -- ----------------------------- ---- --�- -- -- ----- ---_ -- -��--------------------�--- --------------57.2--�- ----- Lf1--- -- 56.5 y� \ \ A C M S \ c� \ \ \ \ • ,�.� 60.2 _ ° - - - l *III _ - a_ \57.4 574 - _ T57.8 • ° - ,l . 571. G 57.3 • n n / •/ 56.9 56.7° 56J 1N`I ° 5 A \ 19 0 1 T57.8 \ ` • 1 . 6 4 1 . ^ I °^ 57.6 n I 57.11 56.5 'y 56 5 111 G 57.6`� \ \ 1 ^ 57.2 _ _ > \ li \ 1 57.2 \ � � \ GRADING NOTES bo. 6o.p PROPOSED s \ \ \ \, \ \ \ 9� 5zz 57.3 7% 5z1 - 58) BUILDING sg.6 \\ \ \ \ • .� sz6'�� FFE = 958.0 1. VEHICLE TRACKING REDUCTION DEVICE, SILT FENCE, AND EXISTING CATCH • �_ ^ y ' (1 IN56.9 N Isis : •\ \ `rrp \` P \ \ BASIN INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GRADING i �B�I I• i L 0 T 4 z.7 'A - �i 68, i o q••\ \ \� \ \ j CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN ^ ° G 57.3 56.6 i .•aP . 6 \ \"1\u �\ • n LOT 5 / LOT 3 7 b° r{ (I G57.7°° o°o• \ \ �i\ T57.3 �. °•, \ \ \ \ \ �\ STABILIZED. 56.8 57.3� 57tJ a • o°a° ° • \ ` °\ 1 1 I -960- - �1p ; 57.1 . p°°°� • ° 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF • P. \ _-_ \ s7 . bo°000°000q• \ \ x59o\ . \� " °i \ 59 59.E \j 1 T57.3 56.8 bo o s� `�`p g5s sly \ \\ EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING CONSTRUCTION. \ I � �J" 56.6 57.p 568 5j,2 �1 G57.3 �.. . 000000000000000000 • \ \` \ � \ \ V\i an'vIl`gs�.� �� / \ �<Zz� 56.7 ° \ L0000000000000d• • \ I\,\°�gl'9 g5o9 \ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF • FUTURE \J LOT T 2 A G57.3 - LOT T 1 ° a•. \ �\ \ �, n \ • \ %°000°000°00000a \ \ \ , S / \ \ DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. 1 BUILDING Ts7.e °°o \ • \ a s Rc \ • FFE _ ±961.5 G 57.3 1 9% . 60 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • \ / F ig55 \\ z1% s6.8 n'o °• 'm\ \ V I 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD SUFFICIENT \ \ . q� INS ALL SILT FENCE AFTER- s6o » » > » • aao ° BA SIN CONSTRUCTION TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL OVER ALL DISTURBED m PROPOSED 4 72 • o 0 o vP_ Y \ \ 7 TIP -OUT C RB 56.5 A o o°c • 1 I FUTURE BUILDING °� I (TYP�r) • oOOOo°o o°o o°o o°o°o°`" '� v o � � � �1 �� \ T AREAS THAT WILL BE SODDED, SEEDED OR LANDSCAPED. • a v 57.5 / o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°. • ,�gp o000000000000000000`._ \�i- y I V BUILDING a FFE = 958.0 �� FU�RE FFE _ ±960.5 57.1 57 s ;` • BUIL ING csi.a z�%_ 56.6 5 s �� boog000g°o��fl000goo°` Al y /� 4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDARS DAYS \ ,� 56.q . !g°o°g°o°g \'�: Sp1%\ AFTER LAND DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY • \-�'///a FFE=±1.0 \ / H.P. T578 Y 1� o�o�b o60�0000go� wmgd80'IOE/\� y \ \ CEASED. \ 1 s7.o szz �• \� \ 1 \ < 576 Ia �*57.5 °\' 000000000000,0�9000000000 0��. tin K'/ \ /' �V °575f G57.3 ].. / g •\ •/°o°o°o°o°o°,oN°mob°o°o°019'' • H • T \ a, \\ �� \ V \ 569 � '.1 .56.7 8 57.4 57.2 00000000000°Tygg.fi �n4 950a • • • • / 3e �:' \ \ / '` ove • \ >° \ \` \ 56.9 . • •' i ' \ ` ; \ 5. ALL SLOPES EQUAL TO OR STEEPER THAN 3:1 SHALL HAVE MNDOT CAT.1 • \ •1� 57.2 56.8 57.2 •° .°,.9 �' . • • 952 �. k' \ \' rn �� 56.8 ° o o� • .. \' / J� 605 \60.1 \ EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AND SEED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. SILT FENCE • o \. 1 57.0 57.1 .97.1 i 9954 56 °9 se.a.5 , - 6 STOCKPILES SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ROUGH GRADING OR p oo --- -- -- - (T`') 60.2 , qb 1 1 \ \ 56.8 • 56 ...\\\ \ /\ / 596 \ 960 960 TI r: ae. 1'�% _ _ . • •' a/q° J \ INACTIVITY. • / aE \ 1 L-----�?�\\\\\\\\\\ 56.4 561\ 6.5 EOF - _ •. • .••• _/ `°� to<�N51'9�'' - / _ ____ __�� > ---- \ 6 3 - - - - - • a 960 < 56.5' _-----------__ --L��.-:��-1,__"��_-�-__' --- r--:f -__ -__- - __ � ---------------- ------I- I e ----- _-- u� . . �� ------------------- �s��---_ -_ ---� __- ro _�`-_ d;, ' z �P, \ ------------------ --- - -- - ro _ - ro - °ro - °ro - °r° - b - °ro ro - - ro ro ----------------- ------ - -- -- °b - °-- b -- --- ro-- co - °-- - -- .ro ----- -- -- -.ro-- - as �b ro------------- --- _ _ p I ------- z- - �- � ____ __SILTFENCE�� Iv Rim 954.8 TVP ____________________i------____________ _-__________________________ sa? _9s. ropl _ SILT FENCE° :♦ v ( ) -- - _ - __=k===------------------------------------------------------------------------ V C �� - _ -=_O_ Rim-9 1 ;R ' 9, -v Inv(5)'9496 -- - a -�___ ________ -_----___----_- 3t r ___ SS7 Inv-9503 9502 --"F ° -- ----- ----- --- S79 1 _ d - ---- ----- ----- - _ - ---_ -____ ----- ----- ____- ---- _____ ----- -- =9" - _---- ----- 6___- ----- -____ -- --V ---_ --SS9- _---- - I - ____ --- 24" DI = Rim- ss.6 -- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----9sa.1-L- ---- -- = d ' 4 \ �oIP 9sza L-- - \ sod "km �s -gyrm N7 9s13 ----I m (" _ --__ `Iz' _-- ----I-- al- 1 -� _ �' S97 I - mv(s>=9sz3 - / I= fi--------- Sao? Inv(N)=9511 I tnv�E)� gg9.8 �Inv(5)=950.9 Rim=957.6 �7^�� i - 21" RCP V _ _____ ______-- `/ •"'-"'°.° 27" RCP ��__i 30" RCP 4 __ _________---------- E_ _ a 33" RC »--->�--» -- >- >---»---»---»---»---»---»---> --- >--->->->---»---» -»--- --»-- ->r °->r---r-->�--»--'> �»---»--->_-»��->r-->r- --- >r __ter_ s�z'»---»---"-- ----- _ _ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- n - D - - D --- - -- D---------��->a --»-->r--> 5 q �_ 10"PVC Inv=9419 V 30"0.CP»---»- n Y n i n / g 1-9412 -<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<-<---<---<---<- S<---<---<---<___<__---<---<___<__ SAY <<�Z-<-__<___<_--�<---<_--<---<---<___<__-<-- <---<---<---<---<-- <-�_<__<___<___<___<___<---<---<---<---<---<___<___<___<---<---<__ <---<---<---<-��--<-- _>Y_-»-- 7 10"PVC -I + r _ 21" RCP ->Y- ii 10" PVC »--_»_--»___»--_»_--»___»-_»_--»___»--_»-t-»___»--_»_--»___> D `I RIm=956.3 I � _____-� T- i I j Inv=943.0 i EOF rn - _______________________---------- - _---------------_____---------------- I\� ---__ ----- ---------------------- ------ A, ---------- I n ROCK `�_ RIm=956.4 CHELSEA ROAD W -__ \---_---- < \ ROCK CONSTRUCTION ° I I_ .. - ° °. °. - °. °. - °. °. - °. °. °. °. °. °. °. °. °. °. °. °. - °. - °. - °. I °.I- °. CONSTRUCTION my N =9s0 9 _---_____ _______ --____________fir`=�F-�c� ° - - I - I- - °. - ENTRANCE Inv(E)=945J \ \ / ENTRANCE- °. - .° - °, - °. - ° -I- I I Inv(s)=9s11 _ --Rim=957.4 Inv(N)=950.7 [rrrn(N)=961A Inv(E)=949) In IEj=948.1 I \ \ \ [\ Inv(S)=953.4 [nv(5)=952.) \ o / \ \` 0 \ / 0 25 50 100 0 \ < SCALE IN FEET > N o o / a / 0 / \ CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Q / x g / \a / Q / O o / N Know what's below. Call before you dig. N / / 0 0 (M E9 r0 0 M U ,2121 N Z U W o0 0 O Z O O Y U U O � % ~ w - LU Lr) 2fl (n N N Z p O M Z I - of N W > � V Ln a\ J w I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: �oe DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 N 00 0 0 W a W N O Z O w IX w Z O L0 N LID LLI J N M N LLI Ln Z< p w Q c-w' U Z / = � 0 .CD 1 ` Z J a ^ LLI V Z J a W , A >o _ Q O LU z o co CD Z Q m U z O CD SHEET NUMBER C4.1 N 0 EOF _ _ �� I � •\ -� SB. S SB. 4 SB. 4 59.2 S9.0 SB.O 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •/� • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •A • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i i i i • i=• ` ` • • • • • • • • • • • \ \ \ \ O \\\\ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '960 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->- - - - - - / SILT FENCE 9s \ \63.0 \\ F 1 \\ \ 1000 / \ (TYP) ( \ \ \\ v� •� •I o• �• b I / \ \ \ \ \ y1 / ° °p \ \ \° \\ \d'96 960 y / 0 15 30 60 / LL \ \ J rn • I o qq • 2 960 - o d • • O \ \ o I'° j• F - - - - - - � / \ \ \ \ \\ \ < SCALE IN FEET > �•I'°od0 m FUTURE� \ \� ° •I= �oBUILDING 0 FUTURE \ �° \ o \ \ S \ \ \\ oLn . FFE _ ±961.0 I - BUILDING `v `v \ \ v \ \ \ •°''o°�+ I FFE _ ±960.0 °q• \ \ / •I ood• \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ I o° • •I�,o�• L' 960 ICI •I °o�• V vv ' s �\ \ \ •I • 6 • °°� V v v • I o ° • 960 ° oz \ \ LOT 7 L 0 T 8 \ vv \ �, \ �� A IN =ILTRATION BASIN 20P . A \ 1 \ 59.4 vv A ��s° \ V A\ OUT EL EL = 953.7 I C L - - - \\ \ ' \ \ \ \ •1 \ \ \ ° \\ \ \ \100 YRoH�WoL� 956.7 I\\ 01 �10q d LLSILT FENCE AFTER � f •I ASIN CONSTRUCTION (TYP) �rn>o°"rnD • o • \ \ o • / / \ \ s \ \ ' \ 958 956 965 10 958 a° :.e59.1 \ ; %s° ��\ �\ �j•� \ \ \\ 57.8° \ V� / %\ \ 58.5 958 57.2 1.2°i° 57. 1.1 °j0 57.2 56.7 56.4 7.0 0.6°i° 56.7 0.6°i°56.9 < < < < < < 0 < < < < < < < < <- < O \ �A L.P. H.P. I I 8� \ - - - 57.6 57.1 •56.8 57.1 ° _ _ 58.9 58.0 n I -- I I ° 57.5 ° -- a ° ° nl nc_- a�-°--°4575 e \ \ \\ 9�\°� \ 0� 58.5 0� .� 95S 0� 57.2 57 2 0� - 0.6°i 56.4 57.0 \ \ \ \\ \ \ -�b.Z 56.5 \ \ s 4 \ � 57.4 % s° \ 57.4 T 57.8 \ \ \\ \ \ e �° e e° s ■ a ° i ❑ 1. G 57.3 \ \\\ 1 56.9 56.7 56.7 \ o--o o Irlu T 57.8 57.6 A 57.0 56.5 'y`Q 56.5 G 57.8 57.2 57.2 : \ \ \ \ \ \ 56.1 II PROPOSED s6. V v A �w 57.2 57.3 7°j° 57.1 5 =f a o ° BUILDING 7 \5P.6 ° 57.6 `%' I FFE = 958.0 g .3 �` o °° a . \\ �� 56.9 �\ ! ° T 57.8 D • • \ s� \ \ \ �I\\ \ I G 57.8 / •it 6.8 a,� 01, \ T 577 3 - 7. ;i IJ �I a ° i 56. \ \ \J \ Z_ / L 0 T .3 � � G 57.3 56.6 � T 7.6 ° "' a°°°�°� • °°4 • \ \\ � \ \ \ \ o �, .. ° G 57.1 °o°o� v 56.8 57.3 57 7 a Q o o _ •�o c v 1/ 960 °o ° a - � 57.1 • oo`�\ <4 e57e 56.8 •o°o°o°o°o= \ \ \\ yg5 Z L- 1 ° o° o v, 0 9 q5%' L \ 56.6 2 56.8 G 57.3 • 00000°000°°o • \ \ \ ° , 0 0 0 0 0 0 \\ e a 0oo°°°°°°°°°°° • \ \ I r \ LOT T 2 T57.8 \ a LOT 1 �� • °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°� • \ l ° 960 -i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a �QO O O O O O O O < cc! G 57.3 �ti h�u0000000000000000 • �� `�� 15oRCPv L 3 57.8 1I` \/ h `� q s� c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,_ �• \ \ \ ar' S5 \ �I G 57.3 Q Q • S°c °o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o. 2.1°i° �9��°b,ocoo°°°o°°°o° �• �: • pqQ000 ,mostlk�4,c, oafop o y • ) x PROPOSED ` 7.2 °o°°°o�'�p-y 0 0 0 0 0 000°0 \ �( n FUTURE o� Q ° \ BUILDING TIP TYP uT c�IRB �\ 56.5 •°°°°°O`'O��o° °° °°°a , o jj o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o s i �<57.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- BUILDING FFE = 958.0 ,� • ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °°o°o°o° \ z� FUURE - FFE _ ±960.5 57.1 57.5;� '� °\° °° °°�� °°°°° °� • \ ° T 57.8 °° 2.2 o• o 0 0 0 0� i�L�a949 o 0 0 0 i J ( \\�\ / • o 0 0 0 0 q, 0 0 0 0 / 0,0 01 \ J BUIL�ING G 57.8\\\>\ \ 56.6 r 5k.5 �000000000�e��'c� 000000doc� • 2 �%/ \ FFE _ ±9(�1.0 \` a o\ 56. �� 1 • �o°o°o°o°o°#"'dR�ld"�"�Oo°o%°� • \c� a$$ �l H.P. ° T57.8 ��J oo ° /o°o°o°o°o°o°o° o°o°o°o�po°qO� �r x \ 57.0 57.2 ° 7 • b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 1• 57.6 G 57.3 57.5 1 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 57.5 a• \ 1� `� aJ° \ • �°0°000000��.94ii�_' 00'0 0- °�- • • \ !� H[] i ix / / \ m a 56.9 ° 56) 57.4 57.2 • o000000000.950 • • • _ / \ ote a° z5b8 56.9 • �00°0°0°�• °•/�57.2 56.8 57.2 ° • �0°�°�•• 952 • • �\ % 56.8 \ ° 56.8 a • �• / \ 960 0 •x 57.4 • • • 954 �• •' `I \ / \\ / A/ in 57.0 56.7 / 56 • • J s �s \ / /� �J 9° v56.6 56.5 ° _ 49 • • • S6. S y /\i \ i /V/ ° °� 11.Oi° 56. EOF - _ _ • • • • • j 04 /' lNl` 9aa� \/ 56.4 0.6 i 56.1 56.2 u .960 56.3 f�% ufo uio- ufo ufo- _ o 0 �,�-� ufo i�fn �ii 2 0 u ufo ufo ufo uTo o u� ufo u ufa ufs uf! ufo = ✓„ �xfo vfa =Ta f� u-fe -ufo _ ufo ufo _ufQ - - --ufo -ufo-------===--�; U{=/� i /--// 9,/\ [O //// U G \' • - _ _ _- -3;r - - u{O = p \� a / • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •V• • • • • • • -•-• "� • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1� • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •S•�• •� --- - -t ---�I _ _.2 v� %_� a /\ ---- _ - - ----� _- _ - - �r 9 6 - - - --- _----- U - 579----------- _-_-__-_I_- --- -------------------------- -a---------- -� --- - �rtafe -ufo- ufFo ufo ufo ufo ufo uip-u#a-- C ufo ufo _ ufo ufo da // qL -------- o 0 0 ° _ - I - -- - / -----_ o ufo ufo ufo ufo � ufo ufo ufo ufo S�j fR ufo ufo ufo ufo + ufo ufo ur s--- - --� _ 9 9---___- Q /J - R P 954.8 {o Q 00 56.8 \� ' o o •8 �S6.p aj8� R�m _ __ - a -. v(W)- 4 9 I 7 -� -------------------v----------------------------- -v------- ---------�� _-__ T'y-------------------- _ f�----� a _949 6 - ----------------------- Rim=954 7 Inv(S)- a \ ____________------------------------------------------------------ - ------------------ I _ 4 �-_--------------------�------------------------------ � _ ` _ _------------�------ Rim=954.7 Inv(N)=950.2 _ ___- S�LTFE - 57.3 I Rim-956.8 SS.6 SS9 =g° � SS.4 _ ----- ------ I Rim 955.6 SS1 Inv=950.3 Inv(E)=950.2 _ N�-=---_ -�_' a (TYP)-_---___=r=- // � IlTnvzTVr93�.�I-----I --I-- I -----I--- I -----I-- I----�I-----I----I-----I-----I-----I--I-----I-----I-----Inv(N)=950_1_I = _ -r - --I �a \ 24'DIP �,77 D R,mg5948.0 Inv(N)-951.3 - v--a----I--�I--- __- I-----I-� / / /� v(N)= ' I Inv S =952.3----_____ ___---- 7 Rim=957.6 �( )-- V Inv S =951.2--------==---a a / / - 3 In S) 90.7 V / 21" RCP I V-------- 4 a = - - v-------------------------------------- a/_ 7 \ �� 30" RCP---------------------� a a - -_ _ \ > _ /7 ' 27" RCP ---a a 33�JRCP / �\ -- _ _ I � -- f----------------------------=�----------- -- _ _ =�__-- _------ � 36 RCP N 9 Rim �9551+V4 now n I I n u i/ I/ / �9yNq 0 > Inv=941.2 \\ ----�---� -<10" Pvc <---<---�<--<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<-I-�)<---<---<---<---<-I-- \<--<---<- <---<-- <---<---<---<---<---<---<--<---<--<---<---<- yG <--��` �09 \ i A Rim=956.3 \ 10" PVC - Inv=943.0 I \\ EOF 55.7 i� A \ \ - = ==G- Flo" PvC ___________________-=__________________________-___--_________ I __________ - I1== ----------------- ----- ---_----_---- ROCK Rim=956.4 -- - n _- Inv(N)=950.9 CHELSEA ROAD W - - - 45. 7_ -- `_--_-_ r\ // I - I CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Inv(E)=951.1 - - ue ue ue u� uc, - ue ue ue � ue ue ue ue ue ue ue uel u� ue ue - Inv(S)=951.1 I I --Rim=957.4 Inv(N)=952.3 I I \ \ �z M o E9 O Lmr> U 0 N Z U 2 wY o O Z Y O LL U U Z O oM zr W >� ElONJ -W oF- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: �o e DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 N 00 O 0 Q W N O Z O W = - N M v0 W Z O J L N �a� C Z (D Lr) N Lr) LLJ I- D u W W U z Q LL_ CD z Q z 0 Lu SHEET NUMBER C4.2 Q O W z z O J J W _U z O 19 EOF SB.O S9. S S90 S9. S SB4 SB. 4 SB.2 S9.0 59.0 S79 � 6� x " • • • • • • • • • • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 171 • • • • • •/• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • O`1 • •=• • • • • • • • • • :0• :eye • • f --- • • 960 960 / \ SILT FENCE J • (TYP) I •°�• I L • SILTFENCE- rn •1oo°o • rn • (TYP) ° • I° ° ° q • `R 9611 ., • - rn o od• rn / • -- �I°p-q• IT T o l5 3U eU�;boo•y ° FUTURE 0,•b°o� BUILDING _ FUTURE < SCALE IN FEET > 1 I •`�?> ° 02 • 1 � , I ,+pip° y. [ FFE _ ±961.0 1 I - BUILDING •a 0 m I FFE = ±960.0 •I�°off• �, •IOOp • • °°od�•- � L' 960 • I' FUTURE I• • I • 960 BUILDING • FFE=±961.5 ,BA LOT 7 LOT 8 • IN=ILTRATION BASIN [OP I BTM EL = 950.5 • - +I OUT EL = 953.7 100 :R HWL� 956.7 i • �oo�• 1 �h w • • � C) I • p°o • • INSTALL SILT FENCE AFTER �- �Lf; p°q LOT 6 BASIN CONSTRUCTION o po,o \\\\\ \ I .alp°,�� / �j rn•"o°�•1 I / 0 rn • °°�• y 1 I • � / � a •Ipop • rn • rn •°°°�• o I • • 1 �� 1 � *-� 958 I • 960 + • _ � 958 I 6�� • 60.E 1 60.0 _ 960• 95 57-ii 57.2 .� 56.7 0 6•� < < < < < 58.5 < <8 < < SL.P. <1.2% Y1.F . < 1.1 /o < < L.P. < /° 56.4 _ I I 60." 60.p 60.4 58.9 58.0 57.6 57.1 �56.8 • I I n I I r' I • _ IIo A � g60 0.6° � 0� 158.5 0� � g5S 0� 57.2 �r� 0.6% � � �.Z 0.0� 56.4 57.(I • W� !� -� o ao a ' r • 60.2 ` \ . 57.4 57.4 - • 56.9 56.71 /- ° \ 56.7 5i.IJ 60.4 • 60.0 60,p e 57.6 n 57.0 56.5 ti , 56.5 1 57.2 57.2 • I ^ 9 56.1 • I V so i\\� ' 57.2 57.3 .7% 57.1 5 ^ • o \ h O\i 010 - o • e \ �o o �' 56.9 " n \ LOT 4 7.7 9 1 q° - • LOT 5 1 LOT 3 ° • I I .4 ° : 56.8 57.3 � 57a7 G 57.3-56.6 I I • 960 59.4 \a> I \ .0 59.driI /.9 5<j 56.8� ° 56.7 57'2 G 57.3 • FUTURE 960 / °I LOT 2 ° T57.8 1 1 BUILDING T 57.8 °° . 1; G 57.3 + \' FFE _ ±961.5 I G 57.3 1.9°io 1 n 21 e • I - o PROPOSED - TIP -OUT C6RB 1 '��- • FUTURE T °T °' • b rn L/ �� n I of I: ° e BUILDING °� r.57.5 / (TYP -4 ) BUILDING FFE = 958.0 �� • / FI TURE - FFE _ ±960.5 : 57.1 57.5 a 1 T 57.8 0° 2 % \\�\ 1 BUILDING / G57.8 + 56.6 \ e 56. i 5ff+.5 • I 1 FFE _ ±9f§1.0 \ o y; ��. Ln /" H.P. T 57.8 \ _ � ° 57.0 57.2 °65: 57.5 1 ° • 1 \ \ < 57.6 0 7.3 �� B • ale \ 57.5 ° °. 0. J • \ \ oX \ m e 56.9 ° 56.) � • \ ° ° / \ °° 57.2 56.8 57.2 ° \ ° 56.8 4 • 60.5 60.1 : \ \ \ J \ 960 0 57.0 �b 56.7 �� \ SILT FENCE • o O � � 1 i � O o`°wvv��..��.. � (TYP) • I : 59.6 60.2\I �b �\ 1 9o v56.6 56.5 • I \ 960 960 ° \ 11.0% 56. • \ % ;� I ( _ 56.4 0 56.1 Fit \ 56.5� i - - • 960 < aI 56.3 5-_-��-�-- aIIII ---- - -- I-- M=-I----_----_- o--• • -_ -/- I� --7---I--- _I--5I----------I-------- --------I-------�---I�/-------I--------I-T��---- -°------ I--- --- --- -•r-°---1-_ S-�---- 1-S�S-A---1_-__-_------------ -- _cs#1a_-- =--------- -z-_a•f��_-_=1_•-_ -F-/ uf-_o C1J= I =_o ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo o ufffo o uro v �fa ui� 59 ~ v v ----- I - ----Qwt - -- I 8 --• • • • • ko v • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • -•!- -• •A --------- ------ u> fo ufo ufo ufo _ - -ufo uo vfu ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo f------------ ---I f_ ------------------- RCP uufo uuo ufo ufa ufo ufo ufo V ufo o ufoufo uo uo fo ufo ufo .8 ------- fo uo -fo_ufo ufo�fo ufo ufv jV SILTFENCuE _ - --------- - -- - -- - - -uI-------------- T--- =954.7 a V (TYP) Rim=954.7RInv(N)=g50.2 - -_________ --------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ------ -- - - - - - Inv=950.3 Inv�E) 2 ------ _- - - - - _------------._=T___ 8--------- _�_---- JV___________ r--- V-_950.1 -----1-------_ �I ��24"DIP 2I --I---I---I-----I--IITnV9n�I------nN()951-S-A--1IRim=9517 o Inv(N)=951.1 Inv(S,)-952.3 VIIInv(S)=951.24v(S)=950.9 Rim=957.6 V 21"RCP0 V 3nRCaP27" RCP30" RCP ______ a Rim-958.6 9 Inv-941.9 30' RCP » n x\ n �\ --- --� -- -�---c---<---<-- <--<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<-_4<---<---<---<---G^--G--<---<---<---<--<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<--<---<---<- a v n 21" RCP __»---» 10' PVC \1 I n Rim=956.3 t 10" PVC ->>---»---»---»---»--->>--->>------>>--->>--->>--->>--->>---»--->> D i I I Inv=943.0 I EOF C� I ----------------- ---I I I-----------_ ---�-------- 55.7 i --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I I -------------------- ------ I ROCK . Rim=956.4 ---------------------------- Inv(N)=950.9 CHELSEA ROAD W --____JI o -----ROCK ---------- ----- I�-------- --- i I - CONSTRUCTION _ I �- ENTRANCE Inv E CONSTRUCTION I ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue u ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue I u I ue ( )=945.7 Ic \ -ENTR�ANC� ue ue ue ue u¢ ue ue - ue � ue - Ue -1- ue � �\ I � - Inv(S)=951.1 I � Rim=957.4 I I v-- Rim=958.1 M Inv(N)=952.3 I Inv(N)=950.7 i 0 0 M:�i O LLo U Lr'> 0 Z U 2 O �z 00 LL U O � w - w u') ~ N (n N Z O � z r*_� w� >� O J - w ooF- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 N 00 O 0 Q w N c/) z O w w Z O c� ri � u-i 1.6 I_� Lc) N VLf) LLI N M N W Lr) Z Q O W Q U Z y z - = Lu fu 0 CD SHEET NUMBER C4.3 "PROTECTION PROTECTION INTERSTATE 94 PROTECTION PROTECTION ` y / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LEGEND z /w co u �o EXISTING PROPOSED LO U PROPERTY LINE N Z U EASEMENT LINE W 0 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT i i 0 H CONCRETE PAVEMENT O O� ZO ---------------- C) LL __________________ CURB LINE U SANITARY SEWER 0 WATER MAIN H ---»---»---»- STORM SEWER W — 2 LLo 0 ue UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC Lp uy UNDERGROUND GAS N uPo UNDERGROUND FIBER O o ohu OVERHEAD UTILITY = (3 SEE SURVEY ° SANITARY MANHOLE > "D Uj ®(D STORM CATCH BASIN rn LU LU STORM MANHOLE U 00 ~ ® STORM FLARED END SECTION HYDRANT GATE VALVE SEE SURVEY OTHER SYMBOLS — — 960 960 10' CONTOUR 958 958 2' CONTOUR OD.O 00.0 SPOT ELEVATION ---- x ---- > x (CURB ELEVATIONS ARE TO GUTTER LINE) • • • • • • • • • • • SILT FENCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS RIPRAP PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: -f DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 0 25 50 100 < SCALE IN FEET > CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Know what's below. Call before you dig. N 00 O O W Q Q W U) Ln z 0 W = � N M q LO �D I- W z O L0 N V LO J LU N M Cfi L0 N w Ln Zap O Ly a U Z y z _ a in = LU _ ILL 0 CD n Z Q a J O Z za O C/) LU y L0 LV c�0 mo o z z_ W 2 O W SHEET NUMBER C5.1 PROTECT INFILTRATION BASIN FROM SEDIMENTATION. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND BASIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION. INSTALL SOD OR MNDOT CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET & MAINTAIN SILT FENCE -\ SEED ON BASIN SLOPES IMMEDIATELY AFTER PERIMETER CONTROL CONSTRUCTION, TYP INTERSTATE 94 I �� 560 S95 590 - - - -Sa 5d4 .SY4 5aP 599 - - - _ .�R4 _ _ _ - _ _ - _ SZ9 � 67 x-"�• v �, " � C � �� \ •--- - - - - - - - - - - - -- --------------- - ----------------- - - 960 SILT FENCE J 9S \ \ `,•630 E 1 •� �• I / \ \ \ q55 6 / SILT FENCE /n o • • �, / \ `\ W`°�g5196p`' \ ' (T'P) �j \ - •-�- �• � / /so � / \\ `960 \\\ \ \ \ m� LL y1 �.cLL \ \\\ • I I N FUTURE I� \ \ \ / o �• BUILDING FUTURE •j ;,"o��oo.y FFE=±961.0 , BUILDING / • / • oDd+ ' FFE = ±960.0 / / • I : 1• 9C� Ill V INSTALL AND MAINTAIN Bul�>INc �I -\' 96f vy�v INLET PROTECTION • FFE=±961.5 'IO�BA LOT 7 LOT s �� ` k�4`\\ >\ '\ \\\\,J IMMEDIATELY AFTER • INFILOUTEL=953.7 LOP \ ,, J CONSTRUCTION, TYP • yl yl BTM EL = 950.5 OUT EL = 953.7 _ m \ J 100 YR HWL 956.7 '\ da\\ LAJ • I" • INSTALL SILT FENCE AFTER - • LOT 6 BASIN CONSTRUCTION • (TYP) •°off �J A A ` �� ° kV A A ��vA i • �\�\\\N\ \ \\ -•� _ I ` I � g58 I � �96b 1w958 �� y591 � a\P , \��\\\ �w �...\ \\;..•.,.. 960 /� • ----------- �_- --\- .--�--- -�-------- -----958� _ -�- 57.8'O�� • so. - , -� -- -----� - -- ! �- -- / nil-�§ - ,------------- --- - \\ \� ,� 0OC • <t.z% < 960 s < < < < < < < z <12% < % < < <�< < < / < 0.6% I o.6% a oe \\ \ `\\ � 9 5 57.2 56.7 56.7 � 7 0 °' G I 2 • 60. 60. <- 60.4 58.9 N 580 57.6 I 57.1 56.8 571 r� \\ \` \\ ,\ \\ •1 • 57S •i. i°•• . 57.5OD •• e• \ \ � P\ 6� ---0.6 _958------------ ° -� 2------57-2--0.6% _ ATION n - L„__ 67 G.6% 5 56.5 \ >` BASIN PROTEFROM SEDCT IMENTATION. - - ` -1 ` J, • �w 16o.z L j 1 - s7.4 574 si. r 57.8 \ \ \ \ \\ 56.9 56.7 56.7 G57.3 INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND r57.a BASIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER • 1 57.0 56.5 >y 565 G 57.6 V .6 4 P 57.6 ; (la 56. �f 591 '\ y°\ �\ • 60. 60. I 57.2 57.2 90 _ _ 5� PROPOSED \ \ \ EXCAVATION. • I \ s7.z s7.a .7% s%1 a rn BUILDING sg \ \ \ \ P ` \ • o 57.6 16 ° r r" a •5 I \ \ \\\ \ b rn ap yP ___l___________. ° \ \ \ \ _ /' i FFE = 958.0 \ \ \ \ �� \ \ \ • 56.9 2 6% �� r 57.8 �'' • \ \ `0 \ \ �\ • �$ 46- L 0 T 4 z.7I �► c sz8 +� • ° q••A \ • LOT 5 1 \ LOT 3 ^ Gs7.3 56.6 ( d� T 76. owJ •p °' \ \`\ \ \ v\ 56.8 57.3 ;1 iO ° r - G5Z1' ° •Ile •^ °� y o°o • \ \ \ \ \ �,ce L ' / �960� \ J • b o \ 5i� / \ \ • P. " ' 57.1 T 57.3 - - - • �� < ,57 56.8 • x S90 � ° ��\ 9 \ > L T T H-9 7 59Po I .6 572 56� ` ,`` ° 5 .2 G57.3 \ I � L • 6000000000000 \ \ \\ \ / ° `3 ,nJ�l, g5 L L \ • � \ 960 • « 56.7 Pi _ u • o • e o ° o ° o ° d�q • � / �\\ \ J` CN 95 p e 0 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° • In ` El' •/ o00000000000000 ln�`5 FUTURE , . rs7.a I \ • . / b' / LOT 2 Gs7.3 \ LOT 1 j ti •yo°y• \ \ �\ \ SSRc \ \ BUILDING \ e h a ° _ 9 / T57.8-I--\ 0 ''� a t o°o°0 0 0°0°0°0°0\• \ \ 4 FFE=±961.5 I '\ ° G57.3 2� �~ »� 19% » 56/ •qpq�° °OINSTALL SILT FENCE AfTHP�•• • n� FUTURE o� BUILDING 7 IP-OUT RB 56. •F000 PROPOSED------/� 72 --» > • ° o BASIN CONSTRUCTION }d • �``/x \ E III J \ a 57.5 a o f BUILDING a FFE = 958.0 a �� (TlP ) • o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°0°0°0 • \ \ �r \ \ • FI URE FFE _ ±960.5 57.1 57 s / oo . bo°° oB laRmfloF�eRsl�m�00000°qq°�• y/ T 57.8 20% o 0 0 oVo 6 fl �VOVo o °ao /• \� \ • 1 o% • 0 0 0 o B�E}j Fo pt4ki.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 BUILB,ING G57.8 J/� 56.6 5 5 \ o°o°o°o o b�o4 0°0°o�o°ql y • 1 \ -� '///a ' FFE=±"1.0 \� �I / H.P. ' rs7a y J\,' • 1 \ \ < 576 I G57.3 ] 57.5 ,' / a o°o°o 0 0 0 0, • X / 57.0 57.2 P. 575� � I • 66000°OOOHH. _ �• ,r3:= �• • \//573 U T I \ \ v • 'I 569 • 56.7 56.8 57.4 \ 57.2 6o°a a'�000°• o° 952 • •�• o° •.45 H • \ \ ^� \\ °°o° ° 56.9 • 60° 000° .. �6'� • /� �. \ \ / / \J 1dp1i� • �60.1 57I2 \ " • 60 5 / ' • Jam.• ` J \ \ r 96,. NN b 56,7 .x ° 57.4 • • 95q ° • • �.' -� \ / ��s�� / / /\\ \ ' �� \ SILT FENCE 57.0 57.1 57.1 i _956 • •�' FF'.�� 1'� ° /,L° \ \ i\'\� \ (n'P)60.2 qbp I eg 56.6-------- ___56.5��/��"' % 56.8 _ _ _ • • • • • ° S65 6.1/ V/ \ / V'�'� / "'CCC\/// 6 % \ 110% 56. - EOF _ _ - �. • • ' ' \°MINI_ 9eeai�� ------------- �--- - I -�h� _ �- 960 < d 563 °m °ro gyro- � - utal °r° °r° °ro ur° �� °f° - °mti,r° .•w uro- °ro- �r� ti,f. --„w ,fa- -� �°_-=�,r ��.- - -era -tea = _ �r� - -vr,r -� ref i/ -9rr = w> a °fo �r.t«,•-•-S•�� -Tr° __, °t° \�,> °'�a �' \O \i; _ 592 � V S9B ----------- � • • � • • • • • • • • • • • • • w• • • • • • • • �-• r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' ,; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •S _----- �`1" - �'r---�--_ - _ -.SS2� ,;,_= h _ _ -� � / J-__-__ - r _ - OL / --- ___ ____ _ ° °o -- ----ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo o ufo uy ufo ub I I � 1 5�9-------------------------------uf° ufo --- --- uf° -ufo - -r - --- uT-� u�-------vfc---- ---- -wb vr�-- -ufo ur° ufo r u- _ ( _ � u1° o - fo ufo - uro f u ° mfi- B X 3/I --� __-V^�.p SILT FENCE -�___° _ _ c V �u-----------------_________----1 __ ____-__ -___ ___-__ Rm=95 ]u �tnv 5)=9496v 4 a - _ \ STILT FEW ___----____----____---- ;---------__-----__------ _------__ Rim 95 InvN ti - r r S7i 956.8 SG6 SS9 S 4 SS7 =950 - (TYP) a --__- �i` m-9ss.6 W)-9s01_-'_� a / 24" DIP _ - \ 7 Rm= -- --9- ----- -z4"DIP------I--- sa2v----------I ��-95i.�V✓'�I-----------------------------I--- i�Nre3z.sl-----------------------------I---� -- --- -- - 1 z -- L--a - n/m- - -°�' 7 n nvr)=9513 I- I- I- I-----I-----I-----I-----I ---f- - I---- -=P I -- lout sal- -v rt--I- a �I- -�=-I- 11nv(N)=9s11 �v(s)=9s23 / Vlnv(5)=950.9 Rim=957.6 V �, ,' 21"RCP 33�1RCP ° ° - 27"RCp-_ 30"RCP________________________________ ___ __ - v RIm=958.6 »_\ �Y> V T------------------------ \ 10"PVC Inv=9419 30"0.CP»--->Y-- n r ^ i /v /' V 54? Rrm=551 t< \\ -SS- <>?- - 1 i / •m,9 �D \ [nv=941.2 ---<---<---<---<---<---<---< --<-- <---<-- <---<---<---<--+ <---<---<--- <---<--- -- ------`io' we `---<--{ <- ,-<---<---<---<---<---<--- --<-� 5---<---<---<---<t--<- -<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<---<--<---<--<---<---<- <- 9 --- 21"RCP __»---» 1 I m=956.3 I __-]0"P\: -_-L % i ->> --- >> --- >> --- >>-->>---»--- ---»-. _-»---»-i-»---»---»---» D I Inv=943.0 i� EOF m--------------------- ------------------ -------------- ------------------------------ ----- -------------- I ROCK \,__ Rim=9 6.4 ROCK , ; CONSTRUCTION CHELSEA ROADN W Iv)= CONSTRUCTION - Oe Iud ue 45.7 ue ENTRANCE ---ENTRANM ue r �\ I v(s)s11 -�-- �--Rim=958 1 --Rim=957.4 Inv(N)=950.7 [nv( 7 - 41A Inv(E)=948.7 [nv(s)=952.7 1"(E)=949 Inv(5)=953.4 I - MAINTAIN VEHICLE TRACKING PAD. SWEEP STREET AS NEEDED. MAINTAIN SILT FENCE PERIMETER CONTROL MAINTAIN VEHICLE TRACKING PAD. SWEEP STREET AS NEEDED. MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION ON EXISTING INLET, TYP / / - INSTALL SOD OR MNDOT CATEGORY 20 EROSION \ CONTROL BLANKET & SEED ON BASIN SLOPES \ IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION, TYP \ \ \ LEGEND ffm 12 M 0 /w u '- o EXISTING PROPOSED LLO U PROPERTY LINE N Z U EASEMENT LINE O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Z ° r. , CONCRETE PAVEMENT O O cl 11 LL __________________ CURB LINE U ------------------ U SANITARY SEWER I I WATER MAIN STORM SEWER > LU LU 2 = Ln ue UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC r' \.O ug UNDERGROUND GAS N N z ufo UNDERGROUND FIBER O oM ohu OVERHEAD UTILITY of 0 C'j SEE SURVEY ° SANITARY MANHOLE > %.0 Lij STORM CATCH BASIN - ij w STORM MANHOLE U 00 ~ ® STORM FLARED END SECTION HYDRANT 0,4 GATE VALVE SEE SURVEY OTHER SYMBOLS - - 960 - - 960 10' CONTOUR - - - 958 --- 958 2' CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION OD.O x (CURB ELEVATIONS ARE TO GUTTER LINE) • • • • • • • • • • • SILT FENCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS RIPRAP PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 0 25 50 100 < SCALE IN FEET > CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Know what's below. Call before you dig. N 00 O 0 w Q w co N Z O w = - N M 1- U.) .0 I-� w Z O L0 N V Ln LLI J N /� L M / L0 N Lu Ln Z < O LLI Q U Z Z \ = LLJ /_ LLCD a J O H Z O za O = W Q t W > oL) m Q o z o w zo O W SHEET NUMBER C5.2 N 0 a PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: BIG RIVER 445 STREET ADDRESS: CHELSEA ROAD & FENNING AVENUE CITY: MONTICELLO COUNTY: WRIGHT STATE: MINNESOTA ZIP CODE: 55362 LAT/LONG: 45.2904,-93.7728 BOUNDARY AREA: 10.000 ACRES EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: 0.026 ACRES POST IMPERVIOUS: 7.500 ACRES NET NEW IMPERVIOUS: 7.474 ACRES DISTURBED AREA: 10.0 ACRES OWNER: DIVISION 25, LLC RESPONSIBLE PARTIES SWPPP DESIGN: JOSEPH RADACH PE TRAINING: DESIGN OF CONSTRUCTION SWPPP, U OF MN (5/26 EXPIRATION) SITE MANAGER: TRAINING: LONG TERM 0&M: DIVISION 25 LLC SWPPP CONTENT THE SWPPP CONTAINS ALL SHEETS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN SET AND INCLUDES THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. IN DEVELOPING THIS SWPPP, THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT BMPS WERE DESIGNED BASED ON EXPECTED RAINFALLS OF 3 INCHES IN 24 HOURS DURING CONSTRUCTION, WITH EXTREME EVENTS RANGING FROM 5 TO 7 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. EXISTING CONDITIONS THE SITE IS LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHELSEA ROAD W. AND FENNING AVENUE IN MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. THE SITE IS BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY INTERSTATE 94, ON THE EAST BY FENNING AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY CHELSEA AVENUE W, AND ON THE WEST BY AGRICULTURAL LAND. THE SITE IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED AND USED FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. THE PROJECT BOUNDARY CONSISTS OF 10.00 ACRES. THERE IS APPROXIMATELY 0.026 ACRES OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARY, WHICH CONSISTS OF THE BITUMINOUS TRAIL ALONG CHELSEA ROAD. STORMWATER FROM THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE GENERALLY DRAINS EAST TO A CATCH BASIN LOCATED NORTHWEST OF CHELSEA ROAD AND FENNING AVENUE. STORMWATER FROM THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE SITE EITHER DRAINS NORTH TO THE INTERSTATE 94 RIGHT OF WAY DITCH OR SOUTH TO CHELSEA ROAD. BASED ON CONVERSATIONS WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, CHELSEA ROAD HAS TRUNK STORM SEWER DESIGNED TO RECEIVE STORMWATER FROM THE SITE IN A FULLY DEVELOPED CONDITION. THERE ARE SEVERAL STORM SEWER STUBS TO THE SITE FOR THIS PURPOSE. PROPOSED CONDITIONS DIVISION 25 PLANS ON DEVELOPING THE SITE INTO EIGHT COMMERCIAL LOTS. EACH LOT WILL HAVE A BUILDING WITH PARKING AND DRIVE AREAS. A PRIVATE STREET WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCESS THE LOTS. PHASE 1 OF THE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING THE PRIVATE STREET THROUGH THE SITE AND FULL BUILDOUT OF LOTS 1 AND 2. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ANALYSIS, IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE OVERALL PROJECT WILL BE 75 PERCENT IMPERVIOUS. BASED ON THE 10.00 ACRES PROJECT SIZE, THE ANTICIPATED TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR THE PROJECT IS 7.500 ACRES. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT, APPROXIMATELY 10.0 ACRES WILL BE DISTURBED. STORM SEWER WILL BE USED TO COLLECT STORMWATER FROM THE SITE. THE STORM SEWER WILL BE ROUTED TO TWO INFILTRATION BASINS THAT HAVE BEEN SIZED TO PROVIDE VOLUME CONTROL FOR 1.1 INCHES OF RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. THE INFILTRATION BASINS WILL DISCHARGE TO THE TRUNK STORM SEWER LOCATED IN CHELSEA ROAD. BASED ON CONVERSATIONS WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, RATE CONTROL IS PROVIDED FOR THE SITE IN A FULLY DEVELOPED CONDITION IN THE REGIONAL PONDS LOCATED EAST OF FENNING AVENUE. SOIL INFORMATION IN JULY OF 2023, CHOSEN VALLEY TESTING DRILLED 14 SOIL BORINGS WITHIN THE SITE. THE BORINGS GENERALLY SHOW ABOUT 12 TO 24 INCHES OF TOPSOIL UNDERLAIN BY POORLY GRADED SAND. THESE SOILS FALL WITHIN THE HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP "A". GROUNDWATER WAS NOT OBSERVED IN ANY OF THE BORINGS. SITE CONTAMINATION A PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED ON THE SITE IN AND FOUND NO RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS. STORMWATER RECEIVING WATERS ALL STORMWATER FROM THE SITE ULTIMATELY DRAINS TO REGIONAL PONDS LOCATED EAST OF FENNING AVENUE. SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATERS THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 2,500 FEET NORTH OF THE SITE AND IS LISTED AS AN IMPAIRED WATER WITH A CONSTRUCTION RELATED PARAMETER. ADDITIONAL BMPS ARE REQUIRED TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE AND ARE AS FOLLOWS: • PERMITTEES MUST IMMEDIATELY INITIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING SOIL STOCKPILES, AND COMPLETE THE STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. • PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. WETLAND CONSIDERATIONS THERE ARE NO KNOWN WETLANDS ONSITE. PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM THE SITE DRAINS TO A REGIONAL STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM THAT WAS SIZED TO PROVIDE RATE CONTROL FOR THE SUBJECT SITE IN A FULLY DEVELOPED CONDITION. THE MPCA CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT REQUIRES SITES TO PROVIDE A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF ONE INCH TIMES THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. THE CITY OF MONTICELLO REQUIRES SITES TO PROVIDE A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF 1.1 INCHES TIMES THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. THE TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA FOR THE SITE BASED ON 75 PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS IS 7.500 ACRES. BASED ON THE MORE STRINGENT 1.1 INCH WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENT, THE REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME IS 0.688 ACRE FEET. WHERE SITE CONDITIONS ALLOW, THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME SHALL BE INFILTRATED ONSITE. ONSITE SOILS CONSIST OF POORLY GRADED SAND, WHICH ARE CONDUCIVE FOR INFILTRATION WITH AN EXPECTED INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR. THE PROJECT PROPOSED TWO INFILTRATION BASINS TO PROVIDE THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME ABSTRACTION. BOTH BASIN ARE DESIGNED TO HAVE A DEPTH BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE BASIN AND THE OUTLET OF 3.2 FEET, WHICH WILL PROVIDE BASIN DRAWDOWN WITHIN 48 HOURS BASED ON THE ASSUMED INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCHES PER HOUR. PRETREATMENT FOR BOTH BASINS WILL BE PROVIDED BY SUMP STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. BASIN 10P PROVIDES 0.531 ACRE FEET OF WATER QUALITY VOLUME ABSTRACTION AND BASIN 20P PROVIDES 0.274 ACRE FEET OF WATER QUALITY VOLUME ABSTRACTION. THE COMBINED WATER QUALITY VOLUME ABSTRACTION FOR THE TWO BASINS IS 0.805 ACRE FEET. THE TWO BASINS PROVIDE AN EXCESS WATER QUALITY VOLUME ABSTRACTION OF 0.117 ACRE FEET BASED ON THE 0.713 ACRE FEET REQUIREMENT. BMP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING BMPS: • VEHICLE TRACKING PAD • PERIMETER CONTROL • STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION, IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING BMPS: • PHASED GRADING • STREET SWEEPING • STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOILS • STABILIZATION OF DITCHES OR SWALES • STOCKPILE PERIMETER CONTROL & STABILIZATION • MINIMIZATION OF SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVATION OF TOPSOIL • CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA • STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ESTIMATED QUANTITIES VEHICLE TRACKING PAD 2 EA SILT FENCE 2,970 LF INLET PROTECTION 26 EA EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 2,200 SY TURF ESTABLISHMENT 8.5 AC N PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS WERE TAKEN FROM THE MPCA CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER GENERAL PERMIT. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE TO FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER GENERAL PERMIT. 3.1 APPLICATION AND COVERAGE EFFECTIVE DATE. [MINN. R. 70901 3.2 THE OWNER AND OPERATOR MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE ON-LINE APPLICATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE FEE TO THE MPCA FOR EACH PROJECT THAT DISTURBS ONE (1) OR MORE ACRES OF LAND OR FOR A COMMON PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR SALE THAT WILL ULTIMATELY DISTURB ONE (1) OR MORE ACRES. [MINN. R. 70901 3.3 FOR PROJECTS OR COMMON PLANS OF DEVELOPMENT OR SALE THAT DISTURB LESS THAN 50 ACRES OR DO NOT DISCHARGE STORMWATER WITHIN 1 MILE (AERIAL RADIUS MEASUREMENT) OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER, PERMITTEES DO NOT NEED TO SUBMIT THE SWPPP WITH THE APPLICATION. PERMIT COVERAGE FOR THESE PROJECTS IS EFFECTIVE UPON APPLICATION AND COMPLETING THE PAYMENT PROCESS. [MINN. R. 70901 3.4 FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS OR COMMON PLANS OF DEVELOPMENT OR SALE DISTURBING 50 ACRES OR MORE, THE COMPLETE SWPPP MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THIS APPLIES IF THERE IS A DISCHARGE POINT ON THE PROJECT WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUS MEASUREMENT) OF, AND FLOWS TO, A SPECIAL WATER LISTED IN ITEM 23.3 THROUGH 23.6 OR AN IMPAIRED WATER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 23.7. PERMIT COVERAGE FOR THESE PROJECTS IS EFFECTIVE UPON SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION AND COMPLETE SWPPP, COMPLETING THE PAYMENT PROCESS AND RECEIVING A DETERMINATION FROM THE MPCA THAT THE REVIEW OF THE SWPPP IS COMPLETE. THE DETERMINATION MAY TAKE LONGER THAN 30 DAYS IF THE SWPPP IS INCOMPLETE. IF THE MPCA FAILS TO CONTACT THE PERMITTEES WITHIN 30 DAYS OF APPLICATION RECEIPT, COVERAGE IS EFFECTIVE 30 DAYS AFTER COMPLETING THE PAYMENT PROCESS. [MINN. R. 70901 3.5 THE APPLICATION REQUIRES LISTING ALL PERSONS MEETING THE DEFINITION OF OWNER AND OPERATOR AS PERMITTEES. THE OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT. THE OPERATOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 3, 4, 6-22, 24 AND APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN SECTION 23. [MINN. R. 70901 3.6 PERMITTEES WILL RECEIVE COVERAGE NOTIFICATION IN A MANNER DETERMINED BY THE MPCA. [MINN. R. 70901 3.7 FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHERE THE OWNER OR OPERATOR CHANGES (E.G., AN ORIGINAL DEVELOPER SELLS PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY TO VARIOUS HOMEBUILDERS OR SELLS THE ENTIRE SITE TO A NEW OWNER), THE CURRENT OWNER AND THE NEW OWNER OR OPERATOR MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETE PERMIT MODIFICATION FORM PROVIDED BY THE MPCA. THE CURRENT OWNER AND THE NEW OWNER OR OPERATOR MUST SUBMIT THE FORM PRIOR TO THE NEW OWNER OR OPERATOR COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OR NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER TAKING OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY. [MINN. R. 70901 3.8 FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHERE THE OWNER OR OPERATOR CHANGES, THE CURRENT OWNER MUST PROVIDE A SWPPP TO THE NEW OWNER AND OPERATOR THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES THE REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE NEW OWNER OR OPERATOR CAN IMPLEMENT THE ORIGINAL SWPPP, MODIFY THE SWPPP, OR DEVELOP A NEW SWPPP. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THEIR ACTIVITIES DO NOT RENDER ANOTHER PARTY'S EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS INEFFECTIVE. [MINN. R. 70901 4.1 TERMINATION OF COVERAGE. [MINN. R. 70901 4.2 PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE. [MINN. R. 70901 4.3 PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT. [MINN. R. 70901 4.4 PERMITTEES MAY TERMINATE PERMIT COVERAGE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IF THEY MEET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: a. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED FOR AT LEAST 90 DAYS; AND b. AT LEAST 90 PERCENT (BY AREA) OF ALL ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND PERMANENT COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED ON THOSE AREAS; AND C. ON AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE, PERMANENT COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED; AND d. THE SITE COMPLIES WITH ITEM 13.3 THROUGH 13.7. AFTER PERMIT COVERAGE IS TERMINATED UNDER THIS ITEM, ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT ON THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE SITE WILL REQUIRE PERMIT COVERAGE IF THE SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT ITSELF OR AS PART OF THE REMAINING COMMON PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR SALE WILL RESULT IN LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES OF ONE (1) OR MORE ACRES IN SIZE. [MINN. R. 7090] 4.5 PERMITTEES MAY TERMINATE COVERAGE UPON MPCA APPROVAL AFTER SUBMITTING INFORMATION DOCUMENTING THE OWNER CANCELLED THE PROJECT. [MINN. R. 70901 6.1 SWPPP AMENDMENTS. [MINN. R. 70901 6.2 ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.13 OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS. [MINN. R. 70901 6.3 PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 6.4 PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL. [MINN. R. 7050.0210] 7.1 BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION. [MINN. R. 70901 7.2 PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.1 EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.2 BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED. [MINN. R. 70901 8.3 PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING). [MINN. R. 70901 8.4 PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.5 FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.6 PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.7 TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK -DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.8 PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT. [MINN. R. 70901 8.9 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.10 PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11. [MINN. R. 70901 9.1 SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.2 PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.3 IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3. [MINN. R. 70901 9.4 TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK -CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.5 A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER. [MINN. R. 70901 9.6 PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. [MINN. R. 70901 9.7 PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET. [MINN. R. 70901 9.8 PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G., CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP. [MINN. R. 70901 9.9 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER. [MINN. R. 70901 9.10 PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.11 PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. [MINN. R. 70901 9.12 PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. [MINN. R. 70901 9.13 PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. [MINN. R. 70901 9.14 IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. [MINN. R. 70901 9.15 PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. R. 7090 [MINN. ] 9.16 PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. [MINN. R. 70901 9.17 PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINS ALL STORMWATER. [MINN. R. 70901 9.18 PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. [MINN. R. 70901 10.1 DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING. [MINN. R. 70901 10.2 PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT -LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACE WATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. [MINN. R. 7050.02101 10.3 IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL -WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. [MINN. R. 70901 10.4 PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN -DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. [MINN. R. 70901 10.5 IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. [MINN. R. 70901 11.1 INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE. [MINN. R. 70901 11.2 PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.13, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS. [MINN. R. 70901 11.3 PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS. [MINN. R. 70901 11.4 PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6. PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA. [MINN. R. 70901 11.5 DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS. [MINN. R. 70901 11.6 PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS. [MINN. R. 70901 11.7 PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. [MINN. R. 70901 11.8 PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. [MINN. R. 70901 11.9 PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.6. [MINN. R. 70901 11.10 PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS: a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; OR b. WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; OR C. WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.11 PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE: a. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; AND b. NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; AND C. ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; AND d. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); AND e. DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES; AND f. IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); AND 9. ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. [MINN. R. 70901 12.1 POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES. [MINN. R. 7090] 12.2 PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 12.3 PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. [MINN. R. 70901 12.4 PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM -BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE. [MINN. R. 7090] 12.5 PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035. [MINN. R. 7035] 12.6 PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041. [MINN. R. 70411 12.7 PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE. [MINN. STAT. 115.0611 12.8 PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS. [MINN. R. 70901 12.9 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY. [MINN. R. 7035, MINN. R. 7090] 13.1 PERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS. [MINN. R. 70901 13.2 PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER. [MINN. R. 70901 13.3 PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED. [MINN. R. 70901 13.4 PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. [MINN. R. 70901 13.5 PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON -SITE IN PLACE. [MINN. R. 70901 13.6 FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER. [MINN. R. 70901 13.7 FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. [MINN. R. 70901 14.1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS. [MINN. R. 70901 14.2 WHERE TEN (1 0) OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOIL DRAIN TO A COMMON LOCATION, PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN TO PROVIDE TREATMENT OF THE RUNOFF BEFORE IT LEAVES THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ENTERS SURFACE WATERS. PERMITTEES MAY CONVERT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN TO A PERMANENT BASIN AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. THE TEMPORARY BASIN IS NO LONGER REQUIRED WHEN PERMANENT COVER HAS REDUCED THE ACREAGE OF DISTURBED SOIL TO LESS THAN TEN (1 0) ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION. [MINN. R. 70901 14.3 THE TEMPORARY BASIN MUST PROVIDE LIVE STORAGE FOR A CALCULATED VOLUME OF RUNOFF FROM A TWO (2)-YEAR, 24- HOUR STORM FROM EACH ACRE DRAINED TO THE BASIN OR 1,800 CUBIC FEET OF LIVE STORAGE PER ACRE DRAINED, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. [MINN. R. 70901 14.4 WHERE PERMITTEES HAVE NOT CALCULATED THE TWO (2)-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM RUNOFF AMOUNT, THE TEMPORARY BASIN MUST PROVIDE 3,600 CUBIC FEET OF LIVE STORAGE PER ACRE OF THE BASINS' DRAINAGE AREA. [MINN. R. 70901 14.5 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN BASIN OUTLETS TO PREVENT SHORT-CIRCUITING AND THE DISCHARGE OF FLOATING DEBRIS. [MINN. R. 7090] 14.6 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN THE OUTLET STRUCTURE TO WITHDRAW WATER FROM THE SURFACE TO MINIMIZE THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS. PERMITTEES MAY TEMPORARILY SUSPEND THE USE OF A SURFACE WITHDRAWAL MECHANISM DURING FROZEN CONDITIONS. THE BASIN MUST INCLUDE A STABILIZED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TO PREVENT FAILURE OF POND INTEGRITY. [MINN. R. 7090] 14.7 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE ENERGY DISSIPATION FOR THE BASIN OUTLET WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. [MINN. R. 70901 14.8 PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE TEMPORARY BASINS OUTSIDE OF SURFACE WATERS AND ANY BUFFER ZONE REQUIRED IN ITEM 23.11. [MINN. R. 70901 14.9 PERMITTEES MUST CONSTRUCT THE TEMPORARY BASINS PRIOR TO DISTURBING 10 OR MORE ACRES OF SOIL DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION. [MINN. R. 70901 14.10 WHERE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ITEM 14.3 THROUGH 14.9 IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS SUCH AS SMALLER SEDIMENT BASINS AND/OR SEDIMENT TRAPS, SILT FENCES, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS OR ANY APPROPRIATE COMBINATION OF MEASURES AS DICTATED BY INDIVIDUAL SITE CONDITIONS. IN DETERMINING WHETHER INSTALLING A SEDIMENT BASIN IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST CONSIDER PUBLIC SAFETY AND MAY CONSIDER FACTORS SUCH AS SITE SOILS, SLOPE, AND AVAILABLE AREA ON -SITE. PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THIS DETERMINATION OF INFEASIBILITY IN THE SWPPP. [MINN. R. 70901 SITE LOCATION MAP n O uMj U U-) 6 Z U 2m 0 O = Z 00 Y U U § O Of � F w - w = LQ ID W N N Z p Z r_ = N Lu > � L0 0,� J �w Co F- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: _2 DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 F- m Iq N Co O O L Q 0 w N N U) Z O N > w w Z O Lu F_ Q Ix a Z a a IL W L0 N V Lo J � =) N M L0 N Lu Ln Z Q 2 O Ly Q U Z y z _ a in >w LJ _ LL 0 CD �.D r- a L0 O qqT Lu m Z LLI 2 O �/ J = J LJ o _U H m Z O 5 SHEET NUMBER C5.3 ONSITE PAVEMENT -LIGHT DUTY /0///// h — 1.5" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, SPWEA340C, MNDOT 2360 — TACK COAT, MNDOT 2357 — 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, SPNWA330C, MNDOT 2360 — 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, MNDOT 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE, MIN. COMPACTION 95% ONSITE PAVEMENT -HEAVY DUTY — 2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, SPWEA340C, MNDOT 2360 — TACK COAT, MNDOT 2357 — 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, SPNWA330C, MNDOT 2360 — 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, MNDOT 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE, MIN. COMPACTION 95% NOTES 1. FINAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS AND SUBGRADE COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD 1 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SECTIONS NO SCALE CONRETE WALK 4" PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE, MNDOT 3101 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, MNDOT 3138 (OR COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE) APPROVED SUBGRADE, MIN. COMPACTION 95% CONRETE PAVEMENT '* 6" PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE, MNDOT 3101 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, MNDOT 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE, MIN. COMPACTION 95% NOTES 1. FINAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS AND SUBGRADE COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD 2 RIGID PAVEMENT SECTIONS NO SCALE STANDARD SECTION 2E' - - 20' 5' - - 5'— - 15' 15' - - 5' — 2% CONCRETE WALK (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION) SOD W/4" TOPSOIL 2.5% 2.5% PAVEMENT SECTION HEAVY-DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION PER DETAIL 1 4% �7SOD W/4" TOPSOIL .B618 CURB & GUTTER TCL=C+0.10 STANDARD SECTION W/ RIGHT TURN LANE 2E' - 2L' —5'-5' 16' 14' 12' 5' — LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN 2% 4% CONCRETE WALK (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION) SOD W/4" TOPSOIL 2.5% PAVEMENT SECTION HEAVY-DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION PER DETAIL 1 2.5% 2.5% 4% SOD W/ 4" TOPSOIL B618 CURB & GUTTER TCL=C+0.10 HEAVY DUTY HDPE DOME TOP BOLLARD COVER (COLOR PER OWNER) n 6" DIA. GALVANIZED SCHEDULE 40 PIPE m EXPANSION FELT EMBED IN CONCRETE NOTES 1. BOLLARDS TO BE PLACED 12" BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR AS NOTED ON THE SITE PLAN. 2. CONCRETE FOOTING TO BE HELD BELOW FINISHED CONCRETE SURFACE. 4 6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD NO SCALE R8-3a RED ON WHITE 12" X 18" R7-8m WHITE ON BLUE j� 12"X18" NO (� R7-8bP PARKING WHITE ON BLUE 12"X6" 2" DIA. GALVANIZED SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. EMBED IN A CONCRETE FILLED BOLLARD. HEAVY DUTY HDPE DOME TOP BOLLARD COVER (COLOR PER OWNER) r\ 6" DIA. GALVANIZED SCHEDULE 40 PIPE 0 c`') EXPANSION FELT EMBED IN CONCRETE NOTES 1. BOLLARDS TO BE PLACED 12" BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR AS NOTED ON THE SITE PLAN. 2. CONCRETE FOOTING TO BE HELD BELOW FINISHED CONCRETE SURFACE TO PROVIDE SMOOTH CONCRETE FINISH. 3. CENTER SIGN AT HEAD OF PARKING SPACE NOT MORE THAN 96" FROM HEAD OF PARKING SPACE. 4. SIGN HARDWARE PER MANUFACTURER. 5 6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD W/SIGN NO SCALE VO PARKING 4" STRIPING (TYP) 12" HIGH LETTERS - HANDICAP PARKING SYMBOL (TYP) CASTING SHALL BE MARKED SANITARY OR CO (CLEAN OUT) AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER NEENAH R-1914-A PVC THREADED PLUG FINISHED GRADE 4" CONCRETE PAD PVC 45° BEND PV MINIMUM 1 % SLOPE NOTES: ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SOLVENT WELD EXCEPT AS NOTED. CLEAN OUTS ARE REQUIRED AT 100' SPACING AND AT CHANGE OF DIRECTION. ALL CLEAN OUTS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A FROST SLEEVE. 7 CLEANOUT NO SCALE o 0 o i o o I o o o o of VARIES ~� HAY BALES OR COMPACTED EARTH --� o BERM 10 MIL POLYETHYLENE VARIES SHEETING SAND BAG TO SECURE SHEETING 1. THE WASHOUT MUST HAVE SUFFICIENT VOLUME TO CONTAIN ALL LIQUID AND CONCRETE WASTE GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS. 2. LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTE SHALL NOT CONTACT THE GROUND. 3. LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. 4. A SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY. 8 CONCRETE WASHOUT NO SCALE STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 7 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE. I�l�lli7:7_1:�'�9��71�[e>�9:/_l�� ]�I�I_1L�Z�Zi7 7�7_P►[a��i91�:�LI�I�Z�>t�.l.'�b'i_l�l�>h9:1_1� 3�I_�9Yi]��iPp SEED: 21-111 AT 100 LBS PER ACRE OR 21-112 AT 100 LBS PER ACRE MULCH: TYPE 1 AT 2 TONS PER ACRE FERTILIZER: 10-20-20 AT 300 LBS PER ACRE PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 AND SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS: SEED: 25-131 AT 220 LBS PER ACRE OR 25-141 AT 59 LBS PER ACRE MULCH: TYPE 1 AT 2 TONS PER ACRE FERTILIZER: 10-10-10 AT 200 LBS PER ACRE 1 O NOT USED NO SCALE cilNOT USED NO SCALE co :E �o Lo U N z Z U W O 0 00 o O Z p Y U O Of 3: 2 7 ~ W — f' Lu � u (n N N Z 6 O om cl Z 1_ = N W >Lo �O ON J � W W 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE:' o- DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 F- m N 00 0 0 ui Q W U) Ln Z O _N > W N M 4 ui "6 r-: W z O Ln N V Lo J Lu N M L0 N w L0 ap Z O W Q U Z y z > w o 0 CD �D a LO o y Lu z J W z � O W Lu m Z O 2 3 TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS NO SCALE 6 HANDICAP PARKING SPACE PAVEMENT MARKINGS NO SCALE TURF ESTABLISHMENT NO SCALE 9 E 12 NOT USED NO SCALE SHEET NUMBER C6.1 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-1-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND\ ADJUSTING RINGS MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE MIN 4" - MAX 12" WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT 27' DIA WITH EXTERNAL OR •• F' ,: I INTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL USE R-2 JOINT FOR a ALL MANHOLE JOINTS BARREL TO CONFORM �'.• TO ASTM C-478 - 1 .L d' LATEST REVISION I 48" DIA Title: Standard Plate Library Cone Section, Casting Steps, and Adjusting Rings City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 1001 03-15 ,. USE NEENAH R-1642—A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755—G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS APPLICABLE NEENAH R-1642 WITH TYPE B SOLID LID MACHINE BEARING OR EQUAL CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) EAT OPPOSITE SIDE EXCEPT FOR LETTERING 25 3/4 BEARIND SURFACE TO BE MACHINED (JL_Jv,_3 COVER Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 24" 28 1/2 " 38" FRAME Title: Standard Frame and Cover Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —1 5 1002 NOTE: CASTINGS AND VALVE BOXES NOT ADJUSTED WITHIN THE TOLERANCES SHOWN SHALL BE READJUSTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. FIN15HED B IUMINDUS WEAR COURSE GRADE 3/8 ' MIN. 5/8 ' MAX.1 FRAME CASTING AND GATE VALVE NOT ON CENTERLINE CENTERLINE ROADWAY FINISHED BITUMINOUS WEAR 5/8 MIN- COURSE GRADE 5%8 " MAX. J_ 3/4 'MAX 2ao% z.00x — FRAME CASTING ON CENTERLINE Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title` Adjustment of Standard Frame and Cover Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03-15 1003 3/8" MIN. 5/8' MAX. BITUMINOUS NON -WEAR COURSE BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE ADJUSTMENT DETAIL DS SUPER GLUE ADHESIVE OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUIVALENT (1/4" BEAD, 360 DEC.) BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 3/6MIN. 5/8" MAX. BITUMINOUS NON -WEAR COURSE CAST IRON OR DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENT RING /- AS MANUFACTRURD BY ESS BROTHERS AND SONS INC. / OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: 1. THE HEIGHT OF THE CAST IRON OR DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENT RING 2 I RONINOR DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENTERINGGSS TO BE INSTALLED BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 3. A5AS PER YEAR WARRANTY ISSEQURD FORADJUSTMENTRINGS INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS ADJUSTMENT DETAIL Title: :Standard Plate Library Metal Casting Ring Adjustment Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised: 1004 03-15 O 0 0 O NOTE 1. STRUCTURE MARKER SIGNS AND 3" TUBING WITH 2-1' REFLECTORIZED STRIPS SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTAUED FOR ALL STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF THE STREET SURFACE. (INCIDENTAL) 2. 3" TUBING SHALL BE ATTACHED TO SIGN POST 3. THE SIGNS MAYBE OMITIED AS PER THE ENGINEER r' 4. THE SIGNS SMALL BE BURIED 2' BELOW FINISHED GRADE WITH 4' OF POST EXPOSED 5. SIGNS SMALL FACE TRAFFIC 0.063" THICK ALUMINUM SIGN. BLACK LETTERS ON WHITE HIGH INTENSITY REFLECTORIZED BACKGROUND. U—CHANNEL POST, MINIMUM 1.2 LB./FT. 6' LONG, GALVANIZED. Title: Standard Plate Library Structure Marker Sign City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 __I— Revised: 1005 �� 03-15 STEEL T—STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT FOR WATERMAIN STUB EXISTING (OR FINISHED) GRADE PAINTED GREEN WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT FOR SANITARY AND/OR STORM SEWER STUB PLUGGED END Jf T AND A MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST. 4' POST SHALL BE BURIED 2' BELOW FINISHED GRADE WITH 4' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE (INCIDENTAL) l NOTES: 1. RE —USE EXISTING AIR BLEED LINES AND PLUGS 1" CORPORATION STOP ON PROPOSED STUBS. INSTALLATION TO BE MADE AT 1'— 0" OR 5' IN BACK OF CURB WHERE NO D REQUIREITIONAL D. FURNISH NEW GASKETS IF CONCRETE WALK OR 2. NEW LINES WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID BITUMINOUS PATH ARE FOR 1" COPPER AND 1" CORPORATION STOP. ALL OTHER HYDRAFlNDER PRESENT WORK TO BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. FLAG � WATEROUS MODEL 67 n WATERMAIN STEEL T—STYLE HYDRANT 1" COPPER FENCE POST YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG PLUGGED END wI TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE 7 AFTER BACK —FILL EXISTING OR FUTURE STREET AIR BLEED DETAIL BREAKOFF FLANGE CURB OR GUTTER LINE 1" TO 2" MAXIMUM STREET THE TOP 3' SHALL O COMPACTED ,wa,I ABOVE BURY LINE (FINISHED GRADE) FINISHED GRADE Q WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL POLY STEEL T-STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD �� PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) VALVE BOX AS WATERMAIN MEGALUG MEGALUG SPECIFIED T1' 'O 2" BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED I 1 ' VALVE BEOX GRADE) AT THE TOP INSTALL D ATOF THE POST TO MARK THE TIME OF VALVE BOX AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY u 4, INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) GROUND LINE \ MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR NOTE: DENSITY MN DOT 2105 z PLUG IF GATE VALVE BOXES ARE EXTENDED, THERE ( / ) I I I GROUND LINE L_ WITHIN BSA OF FINISHED GRADE AND EXTENSION ATTA HED 4'z4" WOOD POST 4"z4' WOOD POST z 2 LAYERS OF 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 10' POLY (4 mil) l cx I TYPICAL I I TO THE GATE VALVE NUT !!! 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95S OF TEE AND BEND BEND PLUG STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PIT ~z UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WRT� `� ro 4n 1/4 'STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR 2' 4"x4" WOOD POST O A MINIMUM OF 1 C.Y. OF 1 e STORM SEWER 1-1/2' CLEAR STONE rs WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS -- NOTES: T` o MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. MAINLINE OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. THRUST BLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1/7 VALVE BOX STORM SEWER MEGALUG MEGALUG AND OVER. PIPE SIZE BEARING AREA so Fr 1 WATERMAIN 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE 8" co SO FT� WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 P51. 10" - 12" 12.0 SO FT 1/2" RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED WATERMAIN GRANULAR BEDDING AS 3. THRUST BLOCKS BEARING AREA TO BE POURED 1 16" 20.0 SO FT I BETWEEN THE GATE VALVE AND MIN 7.5 ' COVER (UNLESS PER MN/DOT 3149.2E AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL GATE VALVE ADAPTOR I OTHERWISE NOTED) 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING GATE VALVE TEE SHALL BE USED FOR 12' OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 1/4" STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR THRUST MEGALUG 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 FT. OF A BEND AIRY SF_WER ' . BLOCKING SHALL BE RE5TAINED USING TIE RODS WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE BEHIND BLOCKING THRUST 1/2 CU. YD. OF I MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE BELOW GATE BLOCKING _ OR APPROVED EQUAL SSANIMAINTARY SEWER AS SPECIFIED (15"x 15'x 4') VALVE BEHIND TEE SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO ` 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED (7 I • '� . , , EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. /J WATERMAIN J , GATE VALVE WATERMAIN VALVE BOX INSTALLATION Title: Title: Title: Title: Title: Utility Stub Markers Typical Trench Compaction Standard Plate Library Typical Hydrant Standard Plate Library Blocking for Air Bleed Detail And Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library y Installation y Watermain Standard Plate Library Valve Box Installation and Class B Bedding City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Cit of Monticello Date: Plate No. y City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Cit of Monticello Date: Plate No. y 04-08 City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. 03-05 �� 03-05 y 03-05 Revised: 1006 = Revised: 1007 Revised: 2001 — Revised:03-1 % 2002 / Revised: 2003 03-15 ,, 03-15 �� — N �� t 03-15 f 2n co E9 n3O � LMrD U N z0 U W o0 0 Cz 00 LL U O O w — Lo � N N Z p O C) zrll� = N w � >� E) ON -Li w C10 I— L r I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: _f DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 I— m v N 00 0 a L:Li F- LU N N �. z _O S2 w = � N M 4 Lf) 6 r-: Ln N Ln J LU_ J M W Ln N L0 N Lu Ln Z < 2 0wa U Z y z - w LU LU /\0 CD w Z O a L0 o W z J F_ LLJ > z O W = LU _U H m Z O 5 SHEET NUMBER N N O O GRASSY AREA A 8'WIDE - 4iHICK 4-17 THAN 5' STYROFOAM HI-35 BRAN[ PLASTIC FOAM OR APPRC EQUAL CONCRETE OR BTfUMINOUS SURFACE 8'x 4' x 4" THICK LESS THAN 6• 6' STAGGER SHEETS 4' LENGTH WISE AND 2' WIDTH WISE NOTE: INSULATION REQUIRED FOR WATERMAIN WITH LESS THAN 5' COVER IN GRASSY AREAS AND 6' COVER UNDER PAVED SURFACES. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Insulation Detail Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03-15 2004 --TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE � FINISHED GRADE 9 6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL 4' PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL VARIES 10' TO 20' 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT • • 12' ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) r WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG LPVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 4S BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN - OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 3006 PROPOSED STORM SEWER 8'X 12' INSULATION AT PIPE CROSSING 8'X 20' INSULATION FOR BOX SEE PLATE 2006 45" BENDS MEGALUG FOR DETAILS 4: (TYPICAL) MEGALUG 6" uEcauc-., I 12' WATERMAIN I 20' I90.TE: ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10' OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTRAINED USING TIE RODS. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello VARIES I Title: Watermain Offset Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03-17 2005 C CASTING ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME & COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL r ROADWAY SURFACE I SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 I FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS ., ., WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE © o z - - 8CAST-IN-PLACE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD - PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP F ® CONCRETE - OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN -PLACE N C' g 4' TO 10' Y CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION i (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED 0U BY ENGINEER O "'•�1,•�• O w m o '� CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON 0 OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE ... z x O AND PIPE CONNECTION 2 � Y > U a m ¢ STRUCTURE- 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. Q REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. Q2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED © GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301. GRADE 60. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello l IHE" PLASTERED MANHOLE ,. EXTERIOR CATCH BASIN DIA SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK MASONRY CONSTRUCTION CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) CRETEX OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE - FRAME AND COVER GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND — MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT \ ALL MANHOLES WITH ADJUSTING RINGS INSIDE DROP SECTION MIN 4" - MAX 12" SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) 27* DIA a MANHOLE SECTION TO BE a ASTM C-478 CLASS II T CIRCULAR REINF ��•' LATEST REVISION - - A. 48' DIA USE R-2 JOINT FOR " ALL MANHOLE JOINTS STEPS AT 16' _C L 06" r L• 'CRE-SEAL"; RESEAL", OR APPROVED EQUAL 8" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE \ VARIABLE (MAX. 24" 7—(. 6' MIN PRECAST BOTTOM SECTIO.. WITH INVERT 0 5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE NOTES: 1� MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF (BY MA ALL INC.) CONFORMING TO AIOSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24" INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. Title: Standard Sanitary Plate Library Manhole :Standard City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 3001 Revised;03-15 35 1/4 43" CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R-3067-V PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX / ENCASE IN CONCRETE AI/ COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) L NOTES: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4' CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-35D8-A2. FOR COMPLETE TYPE "A" DROP SECTION UNIT PRICE SHALL INCLUDE ANY CUTTING INTO MANHOLE BASE REQUIRED, ELBOW, TEE, PIPE, SUPPORT AS REQUIRED. PRE -CAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS DUCTILE IRON TEE - ONE LENGTH (20'- 0-) OF DIP IN UEU OF PVC CORE DRILL CONN CT TO MANHOLE rc CONCRETE HORSESHOE AND CONCRETE MORTAR ALL SIDES o � I a a 0 w J; CORE DRILL o CONNECT TO MANHOLE MAINLINE SEWER RISER BASE t.." • •' •`. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Outside Drop Section for Sanitary Manhole Date: 03-04 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 3002 7 A A PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R-3067-V EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE r MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA COLLAR ( CRETEX TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" OPENING CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE +46"(TYP) AND PIPE CONNECTION DIMENSION VARIES m BASED ON STRUCTURE DIAMETER RCP PIPE I CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 433B OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27' ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-3508-A2. STEEL T-STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED GREEN WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND A MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK THE SERVICE STUB TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE DEPTH OF COVER OVER _ INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT r 4_ OR 6" PVC 4' FIELD CONDITIONS PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED AND SHALL HAVE CLASS ' BEDDING E WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER n 6" SEE JOINT DETAIL BELOW MIN R'W 4. PLACE NEARLY HORIZONTAL FOR LOW 12 BASEMENTS AND SHALLOW SEWER AS DRAINAGE AND DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER UTILITY EASEMENT LINE TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR LESS 2' NOTES: 5 PVC =POLY -VINYL CHLORIDE SDR 28 DEPTH OF COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS INCLUDING NECESSARY FIELD CONDITIONS BENDS AND SPECIAL FITTINGS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE BID PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4' OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 4" OR 6" PVC "Yf-'`•"• 45'BEND WYE , _ ELEV TO BE SET BY THE ENGINEER - CONTRACTOR 4' /:r . TO VERIFY PRIOR TO BURY MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED a AND SHALL HAVE CUSS "B" BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER CONCRETE ENCASEMENT „ (TYPICAL) SEE DETAIL BELOW FOR 8" CAULKING BETWEEN DISSIMILAR PIPES f�n co {.1 O � LrMj U L) N Z0 U W o0 0 CZO 00 LL U O O w — Lo � N N Z C:)O rD Z � = N LU >L0 �O E) ON J � W 00 H _.rJ�L r I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: _f DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER ADAPTER TO BE RESILIENT TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR MORE ASTM C425-64 TYPE III OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR DISSIMILAR PIPES CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYPICAL) k� PVC WYE VCP TO PVC FERNCO ENCASED IN - CONCRETE SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING •'• • m '• '• VCP SEWER MAIN (INCIDENTAL). DETAIL: CONCRETE ENCASEMENT•'• THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT Title:00 N Standard Plate Library Typical Service Connection City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 3004 Q Revised: 03-15 j W U) L z O Cn w = N M 4 L6 "o r-: _ { 6" MAX TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS 5/8 FOR 18" TO 27" APRONS 3/4 " FOR 30" & LARGER APRONS. 8' -ANCHOR TOP & BOTH ENDS NOTE: 1. ALL TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER MNDOT SPEC. 3392 & 3394. 2. APPLIES TO FLARED END SECTIONS 12" OR LARGER. 3. ALL NUTS AND BOLT ATTACHING TRASH GUARD TO THE FLARED END SECTION SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED Title: Title: - Title: Standard Manhole for Standard Catch Basin Title: Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Trash Guard for Storm Sewer Catch Basin Manhole y End Section Date: o. Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate N 03-05 03-05 03-05 City of Monticello Date: 05 Plate No. Revised: 4001 i s Revsed: - - - : Revised: 03- 03-17 03-17 4002 03-17 4003 Revised:03-15 4007 W Z O Ln � N V L0 J LU_ J :D M L6C0 lzt Cn Ln N LLI L0 Z < 0wa U Z y z / =ILL LU LU 0 CD a L0 o W z J F_ W > z � o W = LU _U H m Z O 5 SHEET NUMBER N N O O NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS 24' OR LARGER SHEET PILING AS SHOWN SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO FLARED END. NUTS AND BOLTS ON TRASH GUARD MUST REMAIN EXPOSED. 12. 4000 PSI CONCRETE �.OYP) TIE LAST 3 JOINTS ON 0 /(3) INLET AND OUTLET(TYP) 1 1/4 ' HOLES USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO CONCRETE ABUTMENT 5/8" TIE FOR PIPES 12' TO 27" PLAN 3/4" TIE FOR PIPES 30" TO 66" 1" TIE FOR PIPES OVER 30" 4000 PSI CONCRETE "T DO /TO •CO ' AND TIE CONCRHOLES ETE 13UTME #4 REBAR EACH FACE "I --.... (YP) —PROVIDE OPENING WHEN POURING CONCRETE TO ATTACH TRASH GUARD Standard Plate Library City of Monticello SHEET PILING INTERLOCK REBAR EACH FACE 10 GAUGE MINIMUM _: am OUTSIDE WIDTH OF END I I SECTION PLUS 4'- 0" I ELEVATION Title: Piling for Flared End Section Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4008 CONTRACTION JOINTS _ 1 SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH - 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH - 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. z� � Revised:03-17 5012 fi c., II 1 Q o o� is N mo 4 � g 0 m 90 2 �'o0 0W maw a E wa o1¢ �rc m � � 'z� o Q c-� ° d7�Yn '1 Or n m m m m 0,4 m4 m 0, O a I- N P N ZKO �IOimmmO,Nm m0,mN4ON tom91 N[0�<tV ,O ° ON4m,oO fib YNMmmOt ]N lO�4� NNM"I 3 �m 'CSd G=y NMM4N c� Z II g Q N pO U O Y O} 4 m m 4 N O N m m m m m N m O m N 0 0 Y ) m N O m m 4 m N m m 4 m 0 0 M44 6 Tin �6��0 M 4n xim�lV M•i rin�tti�� OmmOt NOK V 4Nmz y �INNM MNiOnnm� z _ !n _ J _ pp Q pp ]�Ril>M nN mm�O mN�O.m NnO,�I ,�}NNWmN0,m 04�Omo0m Vj WW >��NN")YNmm O�"I tG0Y1� OW�i JNM4tOm Ot .-d: Ot ,O ,00,ro4 Z � Q U C7 Oo �� Qmm4mrn Mo+N4�nm 44om �m i4mmN4mn mrnNm�mM N,zzn a �cl riduiro¢i of ri tuo"in cirmv N m a o+,o o; "ieo.n rac of ci of "i ai ,n] O ! p y N N N M M 4 m X Q o - W COj} 4 mMT 47 m m40• N N m O m :" HPmA mm MN mNE00mmN d - nw o��NNria "i viNn p N•o f, Q N ILO O I ZO Q- BE m UO ��K yY�q,O bEOWM �Km Ommm007ONMj tiON K„OM N N"14.6 b m �p�":4 Z O b- -NMN.N N3 Q - a w C Z W Z Soa �N N'0�4no�"Nm4omN �� D_ iRq; iau: "mim nm o'r' n n u.i O N N N M M 4 4 m m m n m Of _ Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Riprap Detail Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 15 4009 o 0 0 o TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS o " MATERIAL: 0 #� ° 3 �' ALUMINUM SHALL BE 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY. o GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE o UP TO 30" o .100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE OVER 30" a o l 3#/FT' REFLECTING SHEETING SHALL BE DIAMOND GRADE. ALL SIGNS CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR a o HGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. o o o CHANNEL POST SPECIFICATIONS o GALVANIZED STEEL CHANNEL POSTS SHALL a o BE USED, 2.5 LB/FT POSTS SHOULD BE o M z USED THAT ARE PUNCHED ON 1" CC. o -g GALVANIZED POSTS SHALL BE OF THE o I 4-RIB DESIGN. POSTS ARE TO BE 7 FEET IN HEIGHT BETWEEN BOTTOM OF SIGN AND - FINISHED GROUND. BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS HARDWARE SHALL BE GRADE 5 MINIMUM AND BE GALVANIZED OR CADMIUM PLATED. NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET NAME SIGNS ARE NOT INSTALLED Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Typical Traffic Sign Installation Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03-17 5016 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY L HORIZONTAL (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION DIVIDER PLATE 3"R 1 6 1/2 " 3'R 3OR SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT 6" 13 1/2 SLOPE 3/4"/FT 2" MIN rZ• 7•I ' HORIMNDOT ZONTAL LINE SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS / STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER MAY BE TILTED IS PERMITTED, THE FORM B612 CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER CONCRETE - 2L47Fi / 1CUD5195LI (98 ;8612) DIVIDER PLATE 3'R 1 0 1/2 . 3"R 3� 6" 13 1/2 " SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT OR O SLOPE 3/4'/FT 2' MIN 2 7•if// V i e HORI NTAL LINE / A0 MNDOT © SLOPE FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER MAY BE TILOPE TED IS PERMITTED, THE FORM B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 117..28FT / CU.YDS(86ta) . (86 8) 12" 3/4 " /PER FT 1/2 ' R 1/2 ' R TL0. HORIZONTAL--,, — . LINE.. • , • . 2'- 0' J MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Title: Standard Plate Library Concrete Curb & Gutter for Streets City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Revised: 5005 03-15 Street Sign�� L TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL: ALUMINUM SHALL BE: 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY GAUGE SHALL BE: .080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30" 100 ON THE LONGEST SIDE — — OVER 30" SIGNS SHALL BE NOTCHED FOR USE WITH E-450 BRACKETS 2-3/8" O.D. c 9" STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL HAVE 6" UPPER CASE LETTERS WHITE ON GREEN HIGH INTENSITY GRADE SHEETING WITH WHITE SERIES E BORDER p ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTIONS 2564 AND 3352, ri SIGNS AND MARKERS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION. d_� BOULEVARD GRADE 11111111=1IIIIIIII-17�1111 � �°-1111111�111111111=IIIIIIII JIIIIIIII-lihIII IIIIIIII IIIIII- _olill ° oo q Millhill TUBULAR POSTS SPECIFICATIONS IIIIIII—IIIll TUBULAR POSTS USED FOR MOUNTING STREET NAME/TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS, SHALL VARY IN LENGTH, SHALL HAVE A DIMPLED TUBE BELOW GRADE OR INSTALL A ANTI- ROTATION q, DEVICE TO PREVENT TUBE FROM TURNING, SHALL BE 2-3/8" O.D., SHALL BE GALVINIZED AND SHALL HAVE lihilill q °,q A WEIGHT OF 2LB./FT. CONCRETE GROUT NOTE: CONCRETE GROUT TO BE MIXED THOROUGHLY WITH WATER BEFORE INSTALLATION NOTE: TYPICAL SIGN INSTALLATION WHEN STREET NAME SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Typical Traffic Sign Installation Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03— 1 5 5017 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER l ^ EXPANSION JOINTS EXPANSION JOINTS \Y B 6' F—A B CONCRETE TO BE EXPANSION EXPANSION POURED INTEGRALLY JOINTS A JOINTS WITH CURB 3 6618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER / VARIABLE 7" MIN. 7 ,/4PR/M1�=H 7" I WIDTH VARIES _ j - 5' MIN. '` 18" SECTION B—B SECTION A —A v Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Commercial Driveway Entrance Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:5008 03-15 0 O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 LL S' MIN. T 2' 2' MIN, 2 STEEL CHANNEL POSTS MINIMUM AT DEAD ENDS I APPROX. 2' 8" NOTES: DEAD END ROADWAY SIGNS SHALL BE X4-11 WITH THE FOLLOWING COLORS: REFLECTORS - RED (DIAMOND GRADE) BACKGROUND - RED MEDIAN SIGNS SHALL BE X4-2 WITH THE FOLLOWING COLORS REFLECTORS - YELLOW (DIAMOND GRADE) BACKGROUND - BLACK OR YELLOW STEEL CHANNEL POSTS SHALL WIGH 3LB./FT. AS REQUIRED. POSTS SHALL BE PUNCHED ON 1" CC AND GALVANIZED. POSTS SHALL BE OF THE 4-RIB DESIGN. HARDWARE SHALL BE GRADE 5 MINIMUM AND BE GALVANIZED OR CADMIUM PLATED. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello i.B" t {{3- QB' 3' 3' 3' 1 Title: Permanent Barricade & Hazard Markers Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised`03-15 5018 ,t F L 0 IW EXPANSION JOINT (TYPICAL) REMOVE CROWN IN 50' TIP GUT OUT A 6 CONCRETE c GUTTER FLOW B-618 - 3' WIDE B-624 - 4' WIDE 3' MIN. 7„ SLOPE 3 4 FT. SECTION A —A f�n co Lr) � LrMj U N Z Z0 U W o0 0 CZO 00 Y U O O w — Lo � N N Z p O om = N >"D p� _J w 00 a0 H r 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: �oe DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 Title: N Typical Concrete DO Standard Plate Library Valley Gutter City of Monticello Date: Plate No. (Li 03-05 � Revised:03-15 5009 o w N N Gravel pod(s) MnDOT Class CA-15 O or CA-25 Riprap Bedding N Geatextile fabric Original j grade LLI N M L6 ,6 r SECTION B-B (not to scale) Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates -- Original Geotextile fabric SECTION A -A grade (not to scale) NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trapping device Q A it Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates E O ) o� of L'i / - / co Z_ ~ 24' min. 0 B .2 X / Slope away from w highway �i I� Match 50' min. or Right of Way Existing Grade PLAN Title: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 06-14 = 6002 Revised: 03-15 w Z O Ln ♦' N V � J LLJ_ J m .0 Ln N Ln N LU Ln Z a O LLI Q U Z y Z — L 0 CD �D a L0 o y Rill LU J �— = W � Z o W LU m Z O 5 SHEET NUMBER 0 C6.4 0 N 0 0 EXISTING CURB OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG-23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY ON -GRADE FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" loll AT LOW POINT HIGH -FLOW FABRIC * FOR THE NEW R-3290-VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CC-3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Title: Inlet Protection AStandard Plate Library Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate No. _ Revised: 6004 - 03-15 S /FLIAREI I\FLTARE BACK OF CURB FLOW LINE V 0" O" QI FRONT OF GUTTER V A PERPENDICULAR A�1 � I F F NON -WALKABLE OR S NON -WALKABLE OR WALKABLE SURFACE WALKABLE SURFACE FLAQRE I I FO E O O pN I Oil O O A+' TIERED PERPENDICULAR C 77 F//// F//// Q oil 0u O Cj PARALLEL CURB OR VAR. 4' 0" MIN. CURB AND ppMp -)'REQUIRED LANDING 1 GUTTER 1/4" R. , it L STRAIGHT FORMS MAY BE USED rA, ' 0.02 FT./FT. MAX. 4' 0" MIN. REQUIRED LANDING ,.... > 0.05 FT./FT. AND S 0.083 FT./FT PREFERRED 11/4" R. 6" CONCRETE WALK SECTION A -A 0.02 FT./FT.MAX. PERPENDICULAR/TIERED/DIAGONAL CURB OR fill CONCRETE WALK GUTTER SECTION C-C PARALLEL/DEPRESSED CORNER CURB OR CURB AND VAR. 4' 0" MIN. GUTTER 1/4" R. RAMP - -REQUIRED LANDING- _ •FT./FT. MAX. > 0.02 FT./FT. AND 90.05 FT./FT PREFERRED 6" CONCRETE WALK SECTION B-B FAN REVISION APPROVEDT 11-0/4�-20 OPERATIONS VIVISI OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD C� 0 �� ®) 0 • :Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Q Q I WING NUT ATTACHMENTHOOK SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 388fi Title: Inlet Protection Grate Inlet Cover Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised:03-15 6005 OW 00. w mo wzw h m J a0 o k ti < ZWjp W <M ti p��LDIDV mZ- <G rc 0 mW=m F4 a�6o zw �m m1 zR cxi v�i w ^z4 K u F rca K i Zpfg2 4a z w2. JW a� LU I 12N ',"Jm"mW� zm m o )n le{yy -z i OW- XGU <F7 iO 3 rc.,cw.taz �O:'?< �Z oaam FOHU' 7 L~VO M)IJiw FZ= wvJII ® z<� mz z�}NO -3ma ga ro m z. ? � • . m p <� zm`� _ cxi I a , •' , w w m 88 �& ® ' ': W� - w, a obi oiD.aa ism '�Zg W!"iwe WON ZV'<` ZTO aR� Y wi< o xoo� p i NilO U K p 2<p IOW ��I�ila lxilm NON -WALKABLE WALK OR WALKABLE Q� SURFACE j0 zx / MAX. WALK S O s ON NON -WALKABLE OR WALKABLE �� O4 DIAGONAL SURFACE 2% MAX. OI1 P SHALL ONLY BE USED AFTER ALL OTHER CURB RAMP TYPES HAVE BEEN EVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL FAN®D NOTES: LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR)CHANGES DIRECTION. AT THE TOP OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.0%. AND IF THE APPROACHING WALK IS INVERSE GRADE GREATER THAN 2Y.. INITIAL CURB RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 15'FROM THE BACK APPLICABLETWHENFTHE INITIAL CRAMP CURB EIPREFERRED OVERRS ODISTANCE. ISTANCE.ONLY SECONDARY CURB RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISE WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL RUNNING SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 5.OX. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BEAKS WITHIN THE PAR.1/4" DEEP VISUAL JOINTS SHALL BE USED AT THE TOPS OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES. ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL. -THUS BOTH SIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH.IEXCEPT AS STATED IN 6 BELOW. TO ENSURE RAMPS AND LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED ALL INITIAL LANDINGS AT A TOP OF A RAMPED SURFACE (RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN 2XISHALL BE FORMED AND PLACED SEPARATELY IN AN INDEPENDENT CONCRETE POUR. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR ALL SEPARATELY POURED INITIAL LANDINGS. WHEN SIDEWALK IS AT BACK OF CURB. TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. MAINTAIN POSITIVE BOULEVARD DRAINAGE TO TOP OF CURB. ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 3'LONG RAMP LENGTH. AN ® SHALLICONTINUOUSLY EXTENDAFOR WARNING A MIN.OFI2411INITHE PATH OF TRAVEL DETECTABLE WARNING TO COVER THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF SHARED -USE PATHS AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF THE WALK -OF-WAY WITH THE EXCEPTION OF 3" MAXIMUM ON EACH OUTTSIDE EDGE WHICH ENSURES THE DETEMCTABLE. e.. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello WARNINGS ARE ENCASED ]N CC 0" - 3" OFFSET IS ALLOWED. f - WHEN DESIGNING OR ORDERING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHOULD BE 6" LESS THAN THE INCOMING PAR. ARC LENGTH OF THE RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD NOT BE F GREATER THAN 20 FEET. RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" FROM THE BACK OF CURB.RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" MINIMUM TO 6" MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURB. 01 MATCH FULL HEIGHT CURB. O2 4' MINIMUM DEPTH LANDING REQUIRED ACROSS TOP OF RAMP. Q3 3" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 3'LONG RAMP, 4" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 4. LONG RAMP. 04 SEE SHEET 4 OF 6. TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS. FOR DETAILS ON FLARES / AND RETURNED CURBS. 5 DETECTABLE WARNINGS MAY BE PART OF THE 4'X 4' MIN. LANDING AREA IF IT IS NOT 0 FEASIBLE TO CONSTRUCT THE LANDING OUTSIDE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING AREA. 6 THE GRADE BREAK SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE BACK OF WALK. THIS WILL ENSURE O THAT THE GRADE BREAK IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. (TYPICAL FOR ALL) O 7 Q7 WHEN ADJACENT TO GRASS, GRADING SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE.V CURB, IF USED, SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. WHEN ADJACENT TO PARKING LOTS CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS LESS THAN 5X RUNNING \\\ S SLOPE SHOULD BE USED OVER V CURB TO REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND FACILITATE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL. 8 A 7-MIN TOP RADIUS GRADE BREAK IS REQUIRED TO BE CONSTRUCTIBLE. 4 PAVE FULL WALK WIDTH. "S" SLOPES ON FANS SHALL ONLY BE USED WHEN ALL OTHER FEASIBLE OPTIONS HAVE BEEN G� EVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL. - © INTERMEDIATE CURB HEIGHTS TAPER SHALL RISE AT 8-10Y. TO A MINIMUM 3" CURB HEIGHT. /A © ON. BOULEVARD SIIDEWALKUGRADESHT TO 2+ INCHES IF NECESSARY TO MATCH ADJACENT ' J I OR 5 LEGEND �rt THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT. IF SITE CONDITIONS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO 8.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. 5 INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN j 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3Y. MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN G AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.OX. F INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER IN THAN 2.OX AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN 0 AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. I ® LANDING AREA - 4' X 4' MIN. (5' X 5' MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX DEPRESSED CORNER 2.0X SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. X" CURB HEIGHT M11 STANDARD PLAN 5-29 PROVE 4- s PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS APPROVED: II-042021 MINN2SOTA ` REVISED: DEPARTMENT l TRANBPORTAnoN srATE D R FNG VEER STATE PROD. NO. (TH ) SHEET NO. OF SHEETS E� o :5 r A OVA mO uo II o?;� a iiU II J II II II I y � I a w U 0 0-' 0 3 d W of wa o zw M> ii Q W n gN how �i 0] xx G LU L. II W Hm wm W II J_ Om �! w�y1� it 'S- pa JW wy r`a >, W x 04 zw z $ ii o (Wn ¢wr. a �� z rc ii N Q a Oi ux W W aUp r Y Z z t: Er ma's F_ zw Ww <3 vm15o `m U m x � ca o Of coon p� go ontoMOf r 'o� az �'E m"m` II �" z z0 mm Or II " U O� �� pp � II UU U ou: mI_ zp o fo II O` a w LU oX om pti Na mw W W��III W �< p � y s� w a LLI w o� W w" z e II m 5 9m E. 8w KIC IT� y a eD �a N� II ol0 Ow >>w II N� Iw/Ip ZII II N IH w II II I r_ I I II II T II Y II y A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Title: Residential Building Erosion Control Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:6006 03-15 i 0.7 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 41 SLOPES E' • 0. a.6• 20" .. .. 1.15 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 3:1 SLOPES 3.75 STAPLES PER SO. YD. HIGH FLOW CHANNEL & SHORELINE 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARYAPPMCATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. 2. BEGINATTHETOPOFTHE SLOPE BYANCHORINGTHE BLAM(T IN AW(1S-)DEEPXW(15-) WIDETRENCH WRHAP MM MYIrM-)OFBLANIa:TFXTENDEDBEYONDTHEUPSLOPEPORTIONOFTHETRFNCH. ANCHORTHE BLANKET W" A ROW OF STAPIES/STAKES APPRO%IMATELY tY (3D-) APART IN THE BOTTOM OFTHE TRENCH. BACKR LAND CONPACTTHETRENCHAFTERSTARING. APPLYSEEDTOCOMPACTEDSOILANDFOLDREMMNlW1Y(SORB) PORTION OF BLNNID:T BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTEDSOIL SEWREBLANKETOVEROOATACTEDSOILWITHAROWOF STARESbTAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY lr (3 -)APARTACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BWlO:T. 3.ROLLTHEBLANKETS(A.)DOWNOR(B.)HORIZOW&LYACROSSTHESLOPE. BLANKETSWILLUNROLLWITHAPPROPRIATESIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLESISTAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STARE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM, STAPLESISTAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS GORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. O THE ETX3E TYPE. PARALLEL RE PROP MUST BE STAPLED WRN APPROXIMATELY THE (5v RLNP T) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, RACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANIKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP)EVEN MATHTHECOLOREDSEAM STONTHE PREVIOUSLYINSTALLEDBIANKET. 5. CONSECUNVE BLANIO=TS SRICEO DOWN THE SLOPE MU MUST BE RACED END OVER END (SHINmE STYIE) WITH AN APPItO%IMATE 3'(T.5"n)OVERLM. STAPLE TRRWGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXMATELY IY (90dn)APART ACROSS ENTIRE &M11a=T WIDTH. NOTE: IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITI NiLTHEUSEOF STAREOR STAKE LENGTHS GREATERTWIN 8'(15an)MAY BE NECESSARY TO PNOPERLYSEWRE THE BLANKETS. Title: Erosion Control Blanket AStandard Plate Library Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-08 Revised:6011 03-15 WALKABLE SURFACE 0 F O, 2 0 2' MAX oil 7O T V j V 0" O s SURFACE KABLE �O I I ON @ RAMP II 8% TO 10% SLOPE DIRECTIONAL RAMP WALKABLE FLARE NON -WALKABLE SURFACE = 5 ®X = O ALL D(CAVATION & BACKRILL TO COMPLY W1771 CRY LXCAYAWN ORDINANCES AND REQUIRE EXCAVATION PERMIT FROM PUBUC WORKS OFFICE. 6' 6' TYPICAL TYPICAL 12' P/L UTILITY EASEMENT I V-13' V d 3' 2' 3' 1' / STREET �FIBEK O OE O ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS ARE TYPICALLY PLACED WITHIN 15' OF THE BUILDING DRAINAGE & UTILITY SEWER AND WATER STUBBED EASEMENT LINE 11' INSIDE PROPERTY LINE LAC J TELEPHONE OR FIBER PEDESTAL 1FlBER OPTIC n F F,ELECTRIC - V E E E GAS M TELEPHONE A A G �G N T T -T `N /// T r TELEVISION in PROPERTY LINE TV TV N TV (7LJti I`l •AI TREE PLANTING AREA STREET LIGHTINC STREET UGN INC STREET LIGFING Tnf f�n M � LMn U N z U W o0 0 0 Cz 00 LL U O O w - Ln � N N Z p O om \\ rll� = N LU >� ON J W 00 W � r I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: �oe DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 L Ll BACK OF CURB ALL ROAD CROSSINGS TO BE RIGID NMC CONDUITS J m R/W TO R/W WHERE SIDEWALK OR PATHWAY IS INSTALLED. Title: N Non Joint Trench Utility for 00 Standard Plate Library Commercial/Industrial Developments o City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 _ Revised: �03-15 7003 Q � w (n L (n z O Cn w NOTES) T- CV (Y) .4 L6 �6 r` LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR)CHANGES DIRECTION AT THE TOP OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.OX, AND IF T)k APPROACHING WALK IS INVERSE GRAOE. INITIAL CURB RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 15'FROM THE BACK OF CURB. WITH 6'FROM THE BACK OF CURB BEING THE PREFERRED DISTANCE. ONLY APPLICABLE WHEN THE INITIAL RAMP RUNNING SLOPE IS OVER 5.0%. SECONDARY CURB RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISE WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 5.0%. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR.1/4" DEEP VISUAL JOINTS SHALL BE USED AT THE TOP GRADE BREAK OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES. ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL. THUS BOTH SIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH. TO ENSURE INITIAL RAMPS AND INITIAL LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED LANDINGS SHALL BE CAST SEPARATELY. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET 6 AND THE ADA SPECIAL PROVISION (PROSECUTION OF WORK). TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. WHEN THE BOULEVARD IS 4'WIDE OR LESS, THE TOP OF CURB TAPER SHALL MATCH THE RAMP SLOPES TO REDUCE NEGATIVE BOULEVARD SLOPES FROM THE TOP BACK OF CURB TO THE PAR. ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 3'LONG RAMP LENGTH. AN unnuiIu WTnTu nr nrTCPTAoIr WADMTMp TC ornl Rorn r(SD All OAuoc nrTrPTAD1r WADMTMTdc CIIAII 03 S,S, BACK OF CURB 0" EXCEPTION -OF 3" MAXIMUM ON EACH�OUTSIOE EDGE TfHICH EN§URES THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE 0 oil 5' AX O FLOW LINE j ENCASED IN CONCRETE WHEN ADJACENT TO TURF.WHEN ADJACENT TO CONCRETE FLARES 0" - 3" OFFSET 1 IS ALLOWED. FRONT OF GUTTER S O WHEN DESIGNING OR ORDERING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHOULD BE 6" LESS THAN / THE INCOMING PAR. ARC LENGTH OF THE RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD NOT BE GREATER THAN IF NON -CONCRETE BLVD.IS 20 FEET. COMBINED DIRECTIONAL CONSTRUCTED AND IS LESS THAN 2' RADIAL DETFCTAEILE WARNINGS SHALL 8E SETBACK 3" MINIMUM TO fill MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK of CURB. IN WIDTH AT TOP OF CURB 0" SEE NOTES Qg & Qq FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT. TRANSITIONTO ADJACENTCBACK OF CURB Q , PAVE ONCRETE RAMP O 1 MATCH FULL CURB HEIGHT. Q 3" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 3'LONG RAMP 4" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 4'LONG RAMP. STANDARD ONE-WAY DIRECTIONAL O O 4" PREFERREDU(TBMIN DISTANCE REQUIRED DISTANCE ETWEENRDOMES)WEEN DOMES) 4 THE "BUMP" IN BETWEEN THE RAMPS SHOULD NOT BE IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL FOR COMBINED DIRECTIONALGRADE GRADE RAMPS. IF THIS OCCURS MODIFY THE RAMP LOCATION OR SWITCH RAMP TO A FAN/DEPRESSED CORNER. CY BREAK BREAK I RAMP MAX. SLOPE 1 RAMP MAX. 2.OX SLOPE O WALKABLE SURFACE. DIRECTIONAL RAMPOFLARES SHALL BEFUSED. DIRECTIONAL RAMPS ON THISCSHEETO A z I� IN ALL DIRECTIONS I� IN ALL DIRECTIONS © GRADING SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE.V CURB, IF USED. SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK _ gI LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. WHEN ADJACENT TO PARKING LOTS CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS O _f SHOULD BE USED OVER V CURB TO REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND FACILITATE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL. 0 0' I _ 2' MIN 2' r 41 3 _ 0 MAX. SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS IN FRONT OF GRADE BREAK AND DRAIN TO FLOW LINE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED INTEGRAL WITH CURB AND GUTTER. p" �FLAREBLE O Bx TO lOx WALKABLE FLARE. 0 l 61 PEDESTRIAN / O PLACE DOMES AT THE BACK OF CURB WHEN ALLOWABLE SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED. PUSH BUTTON ® FRONT EDGE OF DETECTABLE WARNING SHALL BE SET BACK 2' MAXIMUM WHEN ADJACENT TO WALKABLE + PEDESTRIAN PATH SURFACE, AND 5- MAXIMUM WHEN ADJACENT TO NON -WALKABLE SURFACE WITH ONE CORNER SET T. FROM DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT WHEN _ _ _ - - OF TRAVEL WITHOUT RAISED OBSTACLES THAT COULDDMISTAKENLY BE TRAVSURFACE RSED BYAA ADJACENT WHO ISCVISUALLY SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED ® IMPAIRED. ONE-WAY DIRECTIONAL WITH DETECTABLE © RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNINGS MAY BE SETBACK UP TO 9" FROM THE BACK OF CURB WITH CORNERS WARNING AT BACK OF CURB -� SET 3 FROM BACK OF CURB. IF 9 SETBACK IS EXCEEDED USE RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS. ® FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS WITH THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS PLACED AT THE BACK OF CURB THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL COVER THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE WALK/PATH. THIS ENSURES A DETECTABLE EDGE AND HELPS ELIMINATE THE CURB TAPER OBSTRUCTING THE PATH OF PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. D� ® THE CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE FORMED AND CONSTRUCTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE BACK OF CURB. MAINTAIN 3" BETWEEN EDGE OF DOMES AND EDGE OF CONCRETE. V !�\ ® TO BE USED FOR ALL DIRECTIONAL RAMPS.EXCEPT WHERE DOMES ARE PLACED ALONG THE BACK OF CURB. J ® PLACE 2 NO.4 BARS 4 INCHES FROM SIDE OF FORMS WITH A MINIMUM 2 INCHES OF CONCRETE COVER ALONG EACH SIDE OF FLARE (INCIDENTAL). RAMP 1.0% MIN. LEGEND 2.0% MAX VAR. RAMP THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT.IF SITE W CONDITIONS WARRANT. LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO 8.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. Q NON -WALKABLE OR \ S INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 1 WALKABLE SURFACE ,. �"^� 1A 5.OX MINIMUM AND 8.3X MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.OX. O° © fill CONCRETE WALK SEMI -DIRECTIONAL RAMP 30012 F THAN 2.OX ANDE ELESS T ANM5.OXSINPTHEHDI EC IONRSHOEN BACK OF CURB 2.OX-3.0X AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.OX. DIi FLOW LINE GUTTER SLOPE 31DOME SETBACK,41LONG RAMP AND D SECTION D-D PUSH BUTTON 9' FROM THE BACK OF CURB ® LANDING AREA - 4' X 4' MIN. (5' X 5' MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX PRIMARILY USED FOR APS APPLICATIONS 2.OX SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. FRONT OF GUTTER WHERE THE PAR DOES NOT CONTINUE PAST X" CURB HEIGHT THE PUSH BUTTON (DEAD-END SIDEWALK) CURB FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS REVISION APPROVEDE 11-04-2031 w JTMS I SMIN � STANDARD PLAN 5 297.250 I 2 OF 6 M APPROVED: 11-04-2021 MINN2SOTA l REVISED: DEPARTMENT 1 OF TRI STATE PROD. N0. AN6PORTATIIN STATE D INENG ENGINEER PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS (T.H. ) SHEET NO. OF SHEETS Ln / N V L0 J �_ J M . Cn -it Ln N L0 N W Ln ZQ� O W Q U Z y z / wLL Lu Lu 0 CD �D SHEET NUMBER C6.5 INSET B RAMP 6" CONCRETE WALK ® BACK OF CURB/ EDGE OF WALK PROJECTED FRONT OF GUTTER FLOW LINE O O 1 �v -o 17" .v: o •:e� .P: �..e :e:• _ :e 24" B-12" 1 INSET B OUTFLOW GUTTER FRONT OF GUTTER INSET A 00 FLOW LINE 2X -5 4 J •In _ _ae qe : ,o p. 24" 8-12" PERPENDICULAR OQ ' 1/4" MIN. TO 1/2" MAX. ... o .'. a'.:. v- INSET A 1:3 MIN. TAPER 1:5 PREFERRED TAPER (UPSTREAM SIDES TANGENT 5' OUTSIDE ZERO 20' MAX. RECOMMENDED F W TO NOT AFFECT PARKING cc 0 r o (A z HOLD TANGENT 5' o wo PAST OUTSIDE ZERO i N � w¢ 1:3 MIN. TAPER a (DOWNSTREAM SIDE) ADA CURB EXTENSION WITH COMPOUND RADIUS (BUMP OUT)® DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC MAIN STREET REVISION: APPROVED: 11-04-20 1.3 EXISTING f............. a `1/2" R. WALK rwr1" R. VARIABLE HEIGHT H 6" V CURB ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE CURB WITHIN SIDEWALK LIMITS EXISTING - ---- WALK K. nporr. ` 1/211 R. f VARIABLE HEIGHT V CURB ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE CURB OUTSIDE SIDEWALK LIMITS 4' MIN. LANDING DISTANCE FROM APS PUSH 6" WIDE B� BUTTON TO EDGE OF SIDEWALK Y-CURB MUST NOT EXCEED 10 INCHES :2 le2 6" WIDE o V-CURB 30" X 30" SQUARE 4" PEDESTAL POLE BJPEDESTAL FOUNDATION (LINE UP CENTER OF POLE (MUST BE FLUSH WITH WITH THE BACK OF V-CURB) THE SURROUNDING WALK) PLAN VIEW r APS PUSH BUTTON MOUNTING SPACERS (SADDLE ADAPTORS) 6" WIDE V-CURB rJrj I TOP OF WAL 1' 5" `I SECTION B-B SIGNAL PEDESTAL & PUSH BUTTON (V-CURB) REVISION: APPROVED: 11-04-20 4LINE INSET A FRONT OF GUTTER FRONT OF GUTTER BACK OF CURB/ BACK OF CURB/ BACK OF CURB/ EDGEOFWALK /-1/ " 2-;X LO EDGEOFWALK 0 Y FLOW EDGEOFWALK u v�° 1/4 d^e 7 0 T" P• e.ge6 0 Imm 24" 6-12" _ _ 24" 8-12" _ NON PERPENDICULAR 02 FOR CURB MACHINE PLACEMENT AROUND RADIUS PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL (REGARDLESS OF RAMP TYPE) MILL VERTICAL SAWCUT BIT. EDGE 05 & 4O PAVEMENT D & O4 n REMOVE REPLACE 2 BITUMINOUS EXISTING BIT. EXISTING BIT. PAVEMENT MILL 6 PATCH PAVEMENT BIToPAVEMENT ..p'a.'p ..p-°�:p ..p'e. p. "O O?: '°-'•.i:•�'4.'.,i:1.'4'•.i''''4'..i °.'°'•.� .a:, •a. i:,•.•°. ay•°._..i:-•'a. i .• m. '�? °'.. •' a'• °'a. •' P' -°'°. •'. ?'.-°'a `'. a•:- ° a'4 a'. P:''e'a. �:?''•' as 'e'a. d a('r,n p. •9. v' v v - v - v - v - v.. 2411 MIN. v • 'n . ° 2411 MIN. SMALL RADIUS- 2'-10' TYPICAL \ LARGE RADIUS 20'-401 TYPICAL SAWCUT SAWCUT BIT. VARIABLE DEPTH CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT CONCRETE BASE EXISTING EXISTING PAVEMENT BIT. 2" BIT. PATCH CONCRETE PAVEMENT 4 �&® ° "a'a'.: °.' a°.. J :d•.p_°u�.D._°.,0.°�.0.,.°•-O" 9 ;:°°d•:a.o°ro.""° " a a'.: a.... .p °: o'?��'o'_ ".'o'?, 'o'.a:pr?,.'p'. .'p?".'o',e:o° t °,aa •,,i °° �' .i,.i 1°°',.i: °'a^' '•a :- :a °:a�. �a. ; a. a;°:°��. ,o. a:. a. ;oa'd-•ae,,::P.. o'°'..••, •a. °h'�. :ar .. ''v''., .. •'.'/2.a ai".i ° v. a A�v;.': a; ti. ,:: �;:a �a:•: :a a 24" MIN. y„ ONLY ALLOWED PER ENGINEER'S APPROVAL PAVEMENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN FRONT OF CURB & GUTTER FOR USE ON CURB RAMP RETROFITS SMALL RADIUS - \ 2'-10' TYPICAL COMBINED DIRECTIONAL (COMPOUND RADIUS) NOTES: POSITIVE FLOW LINE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR)AT A 2X MAXIMUM. NO PONDING SHALL BE PRESENT IN THE PAR. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH. O FOR USE AT CURB CUTS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED PERPENDICULAR TO THE GUTTER FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDE: PERPENDICULAR, TIERED PERPENDICULAR, PARALLEL, AND DIAGONAL RAMPS. 02 FOR USE AT CURB RAMPS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED NON PERPENDICULAR TO THE GUTTER FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDE: FANS & DEPRESSED CORNERS. 0 BEGIN GUTTER SLOPE TRANSITION 10'OUTSIDE OF ALL CURB RAMPS. 04 THERE SHALL BE NO VERTICAL DISCONTINUITIES GREATER THAN 1/4". OS ELEVATION CHANGE TAKES PLACE FROM THE EXISTING TO NEW FRONT OF GUTTER. PATCH IS USED TO MATCH THE NEW GUTTER FACE INTO THE EXISTING ROADWAY. © VARIABLE WIDTH FOR DIRECTIONAL CURB APPLICATIONS. SEE SHEET 2 FOR DIRECTIONAL CURB SLOPE REQUIREMENTS. 0 TOP FRONT OF GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FLUSH WITH PROPOSED ADJACENT PAVEMENT ELEVATION. TOP 1.511 OF THE GUTTER FACE MUST BE A FORMED EDGE. PAR GUTTER SHALL NOT BE OVERLAID. 08 SHOULD BE USED AT VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS WHEN AT A DRAINAGE HIGH POINT OR SUPER ELEVATED ROADWAY SEGMENTS. 09 DRILL AND GROUT NO.4 EPDXY -COATED 18" LONG TIE BARS AT 30" CENTER TO CENTER INTO EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT I'MINIMUM FROM ALL JOINTS. ® HELPS PROVIDE TWO SEPARATE RAMPS, REDUCES THE DOME SETBACK LENGTH AND MINIMIZES DIRECTIONAL CURB. THIS RADIUS DESIGN CLOSELY FOLLOWS THE TURNING VEHICLE PATH WHILE OPTIMIZING CURB RAMP LENGTH. © CURB EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE USED IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS. USUALLY IN DOWNTOWN ROADWAY SEGMENTS WHERE ON -STREET PARKING IS AVAILABLE. CURB EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR APS INTERSECTIONS WHERE SPACE IS LIMITED. PUSH BUTTONS MUST MEET APS CRITERIA AS DESCRIBED IN THE PUSH BUTTON LOCATION DETAIL SHEET. M11 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 I 3 OF 6 APPROVED: 11-04-2021 M I N N 2 S O TA REVISED. DEPARTMENT OF TRANI STATE PROD. N0. SPORTATION EN STATE O N G (JEER 1/2" R. V CURB INTERSECTION CONCRETE CURB DESIGN V EXIST ,.: WALK p 1 w V CURB ADJACENT TO BUILDING OR BARRIER _ _I 4' MIN. LANDING DISTANCE FROM APS PUSH V-0CURB A� BUTTON TO EDGE OF SIDEWALK MUST NOT EXCEED 10 INCHES I I 6" WIDE o V-CURB 4" PUSH BUTTON STATION POLE A I 181, WIDE BY 18' LONG, +' IN.12" MTHICK CONCRETE. MODIFY THE PUSH BUTTON PLAN VIEW STATION TO ALLOW A SQUARE FOUNDATION. APS PUSH BUTTON MOUNTING SPACERS (SADDLE ADAPTORS) 18" WIDE CONCRETE TO MATCH HEIGHT OF ADJACENT 6" WIDE V-CURB rl 9" SECTION A -A PUSH BUTTON STATION (V-CURB) CURB HEIGHT CURB WIDTH H W I <6" 4" I 26" 6" VARIABLE - HEIGHT H 6" PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS (TH ) SHEET NO. OF SHEETS INSET A EXISTING SIDEWALK I I I �1 1 LANDING RAMP 1 OT I � 1 J RAMP i LENGTH I I --------------------I I � 1 , I I 4.5Y. ' 1.5X I TRANSITION PANEL 04 OS I Or (VAR.) I I 6.01 ' 1 - - - - - - - - (VAR.) ----�---- NOTES: INSET A A WALKABLE FLARE IS AN 8-IOX CONCRETE FLARE THAT IS REQUIRED WHEN THE FLARE IS ADJACENT TO A WALKABLE SURFACE,OR WHEN THE PEDESTRIAN PATH OF TRAVEL OF A PUSH BUTTON TRAVERSES THE FLARE. ALL V CURB CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL MATCH CONCRETE WALK JOINTS. WHERE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALLOWS, USE OF V CURB SHOULD BE MINIMIZED. GRADING ADJACENT TURF OR SLOPING ADJACENT PAVEMENT IS PREFERRED. V CURB SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. V CURB NEXT TO BUILDING SHALL BE A 4" WIDTH AND SHALL MATCH PREVIOUS TOP OF SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS. Ol END TAPERS AT TRANSITION SECTION SHALL MATCH INPLACE SIDEWALK GRADES. 2O ALL V CURB SHALL MATCH BOTTOM OF ADJACENT WALK. O CONSTRUCT USING APPROVED EXPANSION MATERIAL PER MNDOT TYPE A-E EXPNSION. LEAVE A MINIMUM I/z' TOP GAP AND SEAL WITH MNDOT APPROVED SILICONE PER MNDOT SPEC 3T22. 4O THE MAX. RATE OF CROSS SLOPE TRANSITIONING IS V LINEAR FOOT OF SIDEWALK PER HALF PERCENT CROSS SLOPE.WHEN PAR WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 6'OR THE RUNNING SLOPE IS GREATER THAN SY.,DOUBLE THE CALCULATED TRANSITION LENGTH. 5O TRANSITION PANELS ARE TO ONLY BE USED AFTER THE RAMP, OR IF NEEDED,LANDING ARE AT THE FULL CURB HEIGHT ITYPICAL SECTION). (9)EXISTING CROSS SLOPE GREATER THAN 2.0%. LEGEND THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT. IF SITE CONDITIONS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO 8.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. S INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 5.0% MINIMUM AND B.3% MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. ®LANDING AREA - 41X 41MIN. 151X 51 MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. 0 TRANSITION PANEL(S)- TO BE USED FOR TRANSITIONING THE CROSS -SLOPE OF A RAMP TO THE EXISTING WALK CROSS -SLOPE. RATE OF TRANSITION SHOULD BE 0.5Y. PER 1 LINEAR FOOT OF WALK. SEE THIS SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. M11 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 I 5 OF 6 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS APPROVED: 11-04-4-2D21 M I N N 2 S O TA REVISED. DEPARTMENT TRANOR SPTATION STATE o N ENG (JEER � STATE PROD. NO. (TH ) SHEET NO. OF SHEETS LANDING ; WALKABLE WALKABLE FLARE FLARE RAMP WALKABLE WALKABLE SURFACE SURFACE 8-lOZ 8-IOX FLARE E m:0 FLARE PAVED FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACE LANDING ; A NON WALKABLE RAMP ON -WALKABLE SURFACE SURFACE 8-]OX 8-10X CONCRETE CONCRETE FLARE m FLARE V MINIMUM 2 1 °-O-�I 1 2 PAVED FLARES ADJACENT TO NON -WALKABLE SURFACE LANDING ' RAMP \\ NON -WALKABLE / ♦ NON -WALKABLE SURFACE // \\ SURFACE / 8-lOX B-10Y. \ / GRADED m GRADED \ FLARE FLARE ♦` - OJ" GRADED FLARES LANDING ; CURB DESIGN V CURB DESIGN V SEE PEDESTRIAN RAMP SEE PEDESTRIAN APPROACH NOSE ✓ APPROACH NOSE DETAIL DETAIL NON -WALKABLE NON -WALKABLE SURFACE SURFACE RETURNED CURB 04 TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS 03 REVISION: APPROVED: 11-04-20 .•�,I§� LANDING 1.07 MIN. S.OY. MAX. ALLOWABLE EDGE OF THROUGH LANE 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. LOX MIN. 5.OX MAX. EDGE OF THROUGH LANE z z J TYPICA I TABLING o \ REA \ w o E� ¢ LANDING ` \\ LOX MIN. ' ` \ 5.OX MAX. CURB LINE AND ROAD CROSSING ADJUSTMENTS PLACE DETECTABLE \ FACE OF CURB/PROJECTED WARNINGS ENTIRE FACE OF CURB WALK/PATH WIDTH _ 04MATCH INPLACE 1 CURB HEIGHT MATCH INPLACE CURB HEIGHT I I I I I DWARNINGSE(� ----------- - ----'- gpCK C ?4 I R 1 /1 I 11 P� / 1 S A I / 1 1 C 1 O1 C ' 1 0.•. v::"-:�.o e.'a NEAREST 1 ' e >. •° '_. RAIL Tq peR , � 3" MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT ,4" PREFERRED I 4'8.5" a ° CROSSING (MEASURED AT FRONT FACE OF CURB) a P.°'°• SURFACE 1 P'n ., FOR A MIN,6" LENGTH (MEASURED ALONG FLOW LINE) I �'' :°'';•-_'.q.• " I DETECTABLE EDGE WITH OQ i I Ik.� :°: °n.'�- 11 CURB AND GUTTER I `� ° PEDESTRIAN GATEARM fl EDGE OF 1 r I R Ao RAILROAD DETECTA LE GATE ARM , O 5 WARNINGS (III v. L4.5'-.}-4.25'-- 5 i.; �875' 5 lV� RA::LROAD CROSS: NG 5 PLAN VIEW NOTES: EDGE OF INTERMEDIATE CURB HEIGHTS TAPER SHALL RISE AT 8-10% TO A MINIMUM 3 INCH CURB HEIGHL INCREASE CURB TAPER 6 ROAD LENGTH AT LESS THAN 8% OR REDUCE INTERMEDIATE CURB HEIGHT TO 2+ INCHES IF NECESSARY TO MATCH ADJACENT BOULEVARD OR SIDEWALK GRADES. SEE STANDARD PLATE 7038 AND THIS SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON DETECTABLE WARNING. RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING A WALKABLE SURFACE IS DEFINED AS A PAVED SURFACE ADJACENT TO A CURB RAMP WITHOUT DETECTABLE EDGE WITHOUT CURB AND GUTTER RAISED OBSTACLES THAT COULD MISTAKENLY BE TRAVERSED BY A USER WHO IS VISUALLY IMPAIRED. -WALKABLE SURFACES SHOULD BE LESS THAN 8'LONG MEASURED ALONG THE CONCRETE FLARE LENGTHS ADJACENT TO NON RAMPS FROM THE BACK OF CURB. Ol 0" CURB HEIGHT. SEE INSET A ON SHEET 3 OF 6. 2 FULL CURB HEIGHT. 3 SIDE TREATMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO ALL RAMP TYPES AND SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AS NEEDED AS FIELD AINTENACE OFNB THO RO DIWAYT NDHSIDE SIDEWALK, ENGINEER JACENTSHALLDEPROPERTY CONS DER TI ONS,RAND M ITIGATTINGDCONSON T(RUCT ONNI PACTS. TYPICALLY USED FOR MEDIANS AND ISLANDS. 8 OS WHEN NO CONCRETE FLARES ARE PROPOSED, THE CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE FORMED AND CONSTRUCTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE EDGE OF ROADWAY. MAINTAIN 3" MAX.BETWEEN EDGE OF DOMES AND EDGE OF CONCRETE. f} ,.*`�� © IF NO CURB AND GUTTER IS PLACED IN RURAL SECTIONS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE PLACED V FROM ff�fjjf/Noesr .' THE EDGE OF BITUMINOUS ROADWAY Al BITUMINOUS SHARED -USE PATH TO PROVIDE VISUAL CONTRAST. r 2' 0 ALL CONSTRUCTED CURBS MUST HAVE A CONTINUOUS DETECTABLE EDGE FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED. THIS DETECTABLE ® EDGE REQUIRES DETECTABLE WARNINGS WHEREVER THERE IS ZERO -INCH HIGH CURB. CURB TAPERS ARE CONSIDERED A CURB DETECTABLE EDGE WHEN THE TAPER STARTS WITHIN 3" OF THE EDGE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS.ANO UNIFORMLY RISES t DESIGN V �� TO A 3-INCH MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT. ANY CURB NOT PART OF A CURB TAPER ND LESS THAN 3 INCHES IN HEIGHT IS NOT 1/2" R. CONSIDERED A DETECTABLE EDGE AND THEREFORE IS NOT COMPLIANT WITH B B ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. VAR. ` TURF OR 6„ 4 4 T ©DRILL AND GROUT 1 - N0. 4 12' LONG REINFORCEMENT BAR (EPDXY COATED) WITH T. MIN. COVER. CONCRETE TOP OF GUTTER A REINFORCEMENT BARS ARE NOT NEEDED IF THE APPROACH NOSE IS POURED INTEGRAL WITH THE V CURB. ` CURB 6 0 ® DRILL AND GROUT 2 - NO. 4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED) WITH 3" MIN. COVER. REINFORCEMENT °.'•.a., BARS ARE NOT NEEDED IF THE APPROACH NOSE IS POURED INTEGRAL WITH THE CURB AND GUTTER. v. GUTTER • a a.''' a n aI 7 SIDE TREATMENT EXAMPLES SHOWN ARE WHEN THE INITIAL LANDING IS APPROXIMATELY LEVEL WITH THE FULL HEIGHT CURB aa' P 7 / 2' ® (LE. W LONG RAMP FOR 6" HIGH CURB). WHEN THE INITIAL LANDING IS MORE THAN V BELOW FULL HEIGHT CURB REFER TO SHEETS 1 & 2 TO MODIFY THE CURB HEIGHT TAPERS AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE BOULEVARD DRAINAGE. CONSTRUCT THESE SECTION A -A I '� 1 TAPERS AT 0"-311 AT 8-10Y.,THEN LESS THAN 5% FROM 3" CURB TO FULL CURB HEIGHT. NEAREST EDGE OF DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PLACED 12- MINIMUM TO 151MAXIMUM FROM THE NEAREST O 0 A RAIL. FOR SKEWED ULAR RAILWAYS THE NEAREST INSTANCE SHALL THE DETECTABLE WARNING BE CLOSER THAN 121MEASURED TURF OR 6"� ® ® WHEN PEDESTRIAN GATES ARE PROVIDED, DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PLACED ON THE SIDE OF THE GATES CONCRETE TOP OF SIDEWALK = OPPOSITE THE RAIL. 2'FROM THE APPROACHING SIDE OF THE GATE ARM. THIS CRITERIA GOVERNS OVER NOTE © . ®CROSSING SURFACE SHALL EXTEND 2'MINIMUM PAST THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF WALK OR SHARED -USE PATH. h h/2 6 PEDESTRIAN APPROACH ® 3' FOR MEDIANS AND SPLITTER ISLANDS. NOSE CAN BE REDUCED TO 2' ON FREE RIGHT ISLANDS. NOSE DETAIL ® SIDEWALK TO BE PLACED 8.75' MIN. FROM THE FACE OF CURB/PROJECTED FACE OF CURB. THIS ENSURES MIN. CLEARANCE s 3„ (FOR RETURNED CURB BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND GATE ARM COUNTERWEIGHT SUPPORTS. SIDE TREATMENT) ®CONSTRUCT WITH EXPANSION MATERIAL PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3702 TYPES A-E. SECTION B-B EXPANSION MATERIAL SHALL MATCH FULL HEIGHT OF ADJACENT CONCRETE. M11 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 I 4 OF 6 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS APPROVED: 11-04-2021 M I N N 2 S O TA4 REVISED: DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION STATE o N ENGINEER � STATE PROD. NO. (TH ) SHEET NO. OF SHEETS I2 6" WALK - 6N •q'; :2„ MIN. `p'n •.0 6 +:pi... .:`` .. p'. I i• 3 NON-CONCRET NON -CONCRETE BOULEVARD BOULEVARD © - - A 5 LANDING n O LANDING 2 SECTION VIEW A -A I I V I I o THICKENED SECTION THROUGH CURB RAMP FLARES CONCRETE C_ CONCRETE _ BOULEVARD BOULEVARD END SILL CURB AT TOP OF CURB RAMP AND DRIVEWAY FLARES. EXPANSION MATERIAL PLACEMENT CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT FOR CONCRETE ROADWAYS PLACEMENT ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP UP TO 2.1 CHANGE MAX. OR UP TO 4Y. CHANGE UP TO 2.0% CHANGE 2.0% MAX. OR UP TO 4Y. CHANGE UP TO 2.OX CHANGE FLOW LINE PROFILE "TABLE" - TWIN PERPENDICULARS _ UP TO 2.OY. CHANGE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 2.OY. MAX. OR UP UP TO 2.OX TO 4X CHANGE CHANGE FLOW LINE PROFILE "TABLE" -FAN PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP 1.0% MIN. 5.OX MAX. LOX MIN. L5X PREFERRED LOX MIN. 5.OX MAX. 1.07 MIN. 1.5% PREFERRED LOX MIN. 5.OX MAX. FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE - TWIN PERPENDICULARS PEDESTRIAN RAMP r 1 I S.OY MAX. 1.5X PREFERRED 5.OX MAX. FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE - FAN 6" CONCRETE WALK 4" MINIMUM AGGREGATE BASE TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION WITHIN INTERSECTION CORNER 36" MAX. SAWCUT ROPOSED PAR ISTINC CURB CURB AND GUTTER AND GUTTER 31 MIN. : a ..: a . ° 3" MIN. SAWCUT T/21�PROPOSED PAR CURB CURB AND GUTTER AND GUTTER REI_NFORRCCEEMENT CURB RAMP REINFORCEMENT DETAILS 02( 36" MAX. 3" LANDING 36" MAX, 36" MAX. :66 MAX. 36" MAX. 12" GENERAL NOTES: 12° Y 1. 12" "TABLING" OF CROSSWALKS MEANS MAINTAINING LESS THAN 2% CROSS SLOPE WITHIN A CROSSWALK, IS REQUIRED WHEN A ROADWAY IS IN A STOP OR YIELD CONDITION 312" SEPARATE LANDING 3" Q AND THE PROJECT SCOPE ALLOWS. POUR REINFORCEMENT 0 RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: ON FULL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT PROJECTS "TABLING" OF ENTIRE CROSSWALK SHALL OCCUR WHEN FEASIBLE. NOTES: „ MILL N OVERLAY PROJECTS: TABLING„ OF FLOW LINES IN FRONT THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS REQUIRED WHEN THE EXISTING FLOW LINE IS GREATER THAN 2X. WARPING OF THE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CAN NOT EXTEND INTO THEHE THROUGH LANE. TABLE THE FLOW LINE TO 2% OR AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHILE ADHERING TO (DTO ENSURE RAMPS AND LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED. ALL INITIAL LANDINGS AT A TOP OF A RAMPED SURFACE THE FOLLOWING C (RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN 2%)SHALL BE FORMED AND PLACED SEPARATELY IN AN INDEPENDENT CONCRETE POUR. 1)CROSS-SLOPE S.OY. MIN. CROSS -SLOPE OF THE ROAD FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON THIS SHEET FOR ALL SEPARATELY POURED INITIAL LANDINGS. 2) 5.0X MAX. CROSS -SLOPE OF THE ROAD 6" 2 DRILL AND GROUT N0.4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED)AT 3MAXIMUM CENTER TO CENTER MINIMUM O 3)"TABLE" FLOW LINE UP TO 4% CHANGE FROM EXISTING SLOPE IN FRONT OF PEDESTRIAN RAMP 4)UP TO 2% CHANGE IN FLOW LINE FROM EXISTING SLOPE BEYOND THE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 1211 SPACING FROM CNSTRUCTION JOINTS.BARS TO BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH RAMP GRADE.BARS TO BE PAID BY EACH. 03 DRILL AND GROUT 2 - NO. 4 X 12" LONG (6" EMBEDDED) REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED). STAND-ALONE ADA RETROFITS: FOLLOW MILL & OVERLAY CRITERIA ABOVE HOWEVER ALL PAVEMENT WARPING IS DONE WITH BITUMINOUS PATCHING ON BITUMINOUS REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS.BARS TO BE PAID BY EACH. ROADWAYS AND FULL -DEPTH APRON REPLACEMENT ON CONCRETE ROADWAYS. 04 THIS CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAIL SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS. FOR CONCRETE ROADWAYS, SEE NOTE S. RAISING OF CURB LINES SHOULD OCCUR IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS. RAISE THE CURB LINES ENOUGH TO ALLOW COMPLIANT RAMPS OR AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHILE ADHERING TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 05 CONSTRUCT WITH EXPANSION MATERIAL PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3702 TYPES A-E EXPANSION MATERIAL SHALL MATCH FULL HEIGHT 1)1.0% MIN. AND 5.OX MAXIMUM CROSS -SLOPE OF THE ROAD OF ADJACENT CONCRETE. LINE MAX.(ONEITHER SIDE OF PEDESTRIAN RAMP)TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE 3) 5.0% RECOMMENDED 3) S.OX RECOMMENDED AX, FLOW LINE 6 USE AN APPROVED TYPE F (1/4 INCH THICK) SEPARATION MATERIAL. SEPARATION MATERIAL SHALL MATCH FULL HEIGHT DIMENSION OF O 4)LONGITUDINAL THROUGH LANE ROADWAY TAPERS SHOULD BE 1" VERTICAL PER 15'HORIZONTAL ADJACENT CONCRETE. REVISION: M11 STANDARD PLAN 5-z97.z5o s s PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS APPROVED: 11-04-20 nn, . ..• MINN2SOTA .•� I APPROVED: 11-04-4-2D21 REVISED: "PERATIMS ""ISMN DEPARTMENT » (JEER � STATE PROD. NO. (TH ) SHEET NO. OF SHEETS SP TRANORTATION STATE N ENG f2n co N LO z U 0 z O O LL U U 0Of O W - � 0 N N 0 cy) zo (3 zl W > �o N UU7 J r- W 00 H L r 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NAME: JOSEPH T RADACH PE SIGNATURE: _f DATE: 01/08/24 LIC #: 45889 H 00 v N 00 0 O L.LI Q W U) U) z O \N W q Lo �o I� W z O Ln CV V L0 J LU_ 0 L6 C Ln N Ln LLI ZQ� O W Q U z Z > w inF4 ILL CD �D a Lo 0 (n LU z J Q W > z U LI w � M� W Z O 2 SHEET NUMBER N N O . O PER THE CITY OF MONTICELLO LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE, REQUIRED LANDSCAPE QUANTITIES FOR THIS PROJECT ARE DETERMINED USING A VARIETY OF METHODS BASED ON AUTO USE ZONES, ADJACENT PROPERTY LAND USE, AND TOTAL SITE AREA. ALSO, AS THIS IS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FLEXIBILITY IS EXPECTED ON OVERALL LANDSCAPE QUANTITIES. THE PLAN BELOW SHOWS TREE PLANTING QUANTITIES FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT. SUBSEQUENT PAGES SHOW MORE DETAILED PLANS FOR LOTS #1 & #2 WHERE THE USERS ARE KNOWN AND SITE PLANS ARE MORE REFINED.. TREES WILL BE PLANTED AT THE MINIMUM SIZES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE. PROPOSED MINIMUM SIZES ARE: 1. 2" CAL. FOR DECIDUOUS TREES 2. 1.5" CAL. FOR ORNAMENTAL TREES 3. 6' HEIGHT FOR CONIFEROUS TREES LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS: TREES SHALL BE PLUMB IN BOTH DIRECTIONS .,, AFTER PLANTING. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT IS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S DISCRETION. THE TREE Y� MUST BE MAINTAIN PLUMB THOUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND CONFORM WITH A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR �x STANDARD LANDSCAPE PRACTICES PRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR CROSSING BRANCHES 5 - REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELING AND DISPOSE FROM SITE INSTALL BACKFILL IN 8-12" DEEP LAYERS & SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NEEDED TO MAINTAIN PLUMB os BACKFILL SHALL FORM WATERING RING AT OUTER EDGE AND BE FILLED WITH WATER AT TIME OF INITIAL PLANTING PRIOR TO MULCHING TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH SAFETY FLAGGING IF STAKING IS USED VERIFY ROOT FLARE ELEVATION AND PLACE AT OR JUST ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. 4" DEEP MULCH - NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TRUNK CUT BACK WIRE BASKET AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP OF BALL —� SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE LOAM PLANTING SOIL �NnISTURRFD NATIVE SOIL CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD TEST PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF POOR DRAINAGE 2 x ROOT BALL WIDTH IS SUSPECTED 01 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL L 1-1 SCALE: 1l2" = 1'-0" TREES SHALL BE PLUMB IN BOTH DIRECTIONS AFTER PLANTING. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT IS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S DISCRETION. THE TREE MUST BE MAINTAIN PLUMB THOUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND CONFORM WITH A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD LANDSCAPE PRACTICES CONIFEROUS TREES GROWN FOR COMMERCIAL CHRISTMAS TREE PRODUCTION CANNOT BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT, TREE SPECIMENS SHOULD HAVE NATURAL FORMS OTHER THAN LIMITED PRUNING FOR HEALTHY GROWTH AND PLANT STRUCTURE. PRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR CROSSING BRANCHES < REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELING AND DISPOSE FROM SITE INSTALL BACKFILL IN 8-12" DEEP LAYERS & SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NEEDED TO MAINTAIN PLUMB BACKFILL SHALL FORM WATERING RING AT OUTER EDGE AND BE FILLED WITH WATER AT TIME OF INITIAL PLANTING PRIOR TO MULCHING VERIFY ROOT FLARE ELEVATION AND PLACE AT OR JUST ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. 4" DEEP MULCH - NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TRUNK CUT BACK WIRE BASKET AND REMOVE I II BURLAP FROM TOP OF BALL SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE . , LOAM PLANTING SOIL �NnISTURRFD NATIVE $rill CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD TEST PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF POOR DRAINAGE 2 x ROOT BALL WIDTH IS SUSPECTED 2 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL L 1-1 SCALE: 1 /2" = 1'-0" GRAPHIC I MATERIAL I SPECIFICATION ROCK MULCH 1.5" DIAMETER GRANITE RIVER ROCK MULCH SOD BLUEGRASS PEAT SOD TURF SEED MN/DOT SEED MIX #25-131 GROUNDCOVER SCHEDULE: LOT #1 = 47,171 SF = 11 ACI BUFFER TYPE'A' ON SOUTH SIDE LOT #2 = 39,291 SF = 10 ACI BUFFER TYPE 'A' ON SOUTH SIDE LOT #3 = 43,209 SF = 10 ACI BUFFER TYPE'A' ON SOUTH SIDE LOT #4 = 27,876 SF = 7 ACI BUFFER TYPE 'A' ON SOUTH SIDE DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREES (83 TO —AL) NOTES SWAMP WHITE OAK RIVER BIRCH • Quercus bicolor Betula nigra 23 = Quantity @ 2" Caliper 8 = Quantity @ 2" Caliper 3" DEPTH PRINCETON ELM BOULEVARD LINDEN 0 Ulmus americana 'Princeton' Tilia americana 'Boulevard N/A 11 = Quantity @ 2" Caliper 14 = Quantity @ 2-1/2" Caliper FALL FIESTA MAPLE HACKBERRY 22o LBS/ACRE (SD Acer sacharum 'Bailsta' Celtis occidentalis 14 = Quantity @ 2 Caliper 13 = Quantity @ 2-1/2" Caliper TREE PLANTING KEY: LOT #5 = 58,824 SF =14 ACI BUFFER TYPE'A' ON SOUTH SIDE LOT #6 = 78,239 SF =18 ACI AUTO USE ZONE BUFFER ON NORTH SIDE LOT #7 = 60,486 SF =14 ACI LOT #8 = 80,503 SF =19 ACI NO AUTO USE BUFFER ON EAST— MORE THAN 50' FROM R.O.W. LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH LOT I1 1 1 - - ` I C.. -1 1 300' VEHICLE USE AREA BUFFER 12 - 2" OVERSTORY TREES ORNAMENTAL TREES (48) SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE Malus x'Spring Snow' 20 = Quantity @ 2" Caliper JAPANESE TREE LILAC Syringa reticulata 12 = Quantity @ 2" Caliper AUT. BRILL. SERVICEBERRY Amelanchier x grandiflora 'A.B.' 16 = Quantity @ 2" Caliper CONIFEROUS TREES (27) tl6 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE �e@ 8 = Quantity @ 6' Height _ COLORADO SPRUCE 5 = Quantity @ 6' Height AUSTRIAN PINE 11 = Quantity @ 6' Height II SCOTCH PINE 3 = Quantity @ 6' Height 0 25' 50' 1000, %7 =mm= SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" LOTS #3 THRU #8 ARE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANS AND BUILDING FOOTPRINTS. MORE DETAILED LANDSCAPE DESIGN WILL BE PROVIDED AT SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL, BUT WILL MEET MINIMUM SHRUB QUANTITIES BASED ON BUILDING PERIMETER. I TI D �,, , _ "=--FLIT E LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL INCLUDE AT LEAST 53 FUTURE LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL INCLUDE AT LEAST 68 S BASED ON A BUILDING PERIMETER OF 26`2 t� SHRUBS BASED ON A BUILDING PERIMETER OF 336 LF BT� FL - 9b,j 5 _ =_— OU7 EL = 9537 -T-100 1'R HWL = 95_ I' I I I AL4 . F O II R L NI7SCWP PLAN I I FUTURE LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL INCLUDE AT LEAST 96 SHRUBS BASED ON A BUILDING PERIMETER OF 480 LF. r� e VV FUTURE LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL INCLUDE AT LEAST 70 SHRUBS BASED ON A BUILDING PERIMETER OF 349 LF. L It I -1 INCLUDE AT LEAST 35 SHRUBS BASED ON A BUILDING PERIME F 174 L.F. i .JIIIt'IIIIf FUTURE LANUJIUArt_ FLAIN WILL IINULIJut= AT SHRUBS BASED ON A BUILDING PERIMETER ( �.�✓ �.r/ fir/ �. 454' OIF TYPE X'A' BUFFER 5 - 2" OVERSTORY TREES 23 - 2" ORNAMENTAL TREES JP - JIVIALL JI"IKUfiJ NORTH R ------------------ -- = -S SHEET 1_14 FOR MORE AILED LANDSCAPE DESIGN FOR LOTS #1 & 2 ------------- ----------- = == x 228' OF TYPE 'A' BUFFER ,► 3 - 2" OVERSTORY TREES 12 - 2" ORNAMENTAL TREES 35 - SMALL SHRUBS 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1� 1 1 Inside Outside Architecture IncL 14165 James Road - Suite 200A Rogers, MN 55374 Phone: 612-237-8355 www.insideoutsidearchitecture.com Project Name: BIG RIVER #445 Monticello, Minnesota COPYRIGHT 2024 This plan is copyrighted and shall be used only for the project shown and shall not be copied or reproduced without written permission from Inside Outside Architecture, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Paul Kangas Registration #: 26017 ,3ignatur Project #: 23-018 Date: CITY SUBMITTAL 1 01-08-2024 Revision: Drawn By: PK Checked By: PK Sheet Title: OVERALL TREE PLANTING PLAN Sheet Number: TREE PLANTING DETAILS: TREE PLANTING PLAN: x x x - -- - - ----- - ----- - - ----_ --=---_ _= -= = _-_-= _-_-_-= - _ _ _ _ ►- -----_ ----- _ � ----- _ _-_ - -_ ---_ - --= _ --- - ----= = = =_ _ - _ _ _- � _ -- _ _-_ _ _- - =------=------=-- y - - - - -- i ---------------------- - - -------------------- --- _--_ _ _ -_ -- _ - - ------ = ------- ----- _ -_-_-- _-_- -_ _-_-- _-__ — - k---__-- _--_ -,�_--__-- �- _- -_ _ _- -_- _ -_-_-_ _- - --_ -----_---_--- -_ - -_ - _--_ -_-------_----- I =_ _-_ _ _ _ _-_ -- - _- --------------------- ----------- ------------ -2------ _----=---------------=-- -- -__= -------------- - - t - - / - - ----_- - __- - D 1 lit_ -fi=- --_ r D(-NFiL-AT101`4 -3AS1N - - $ TM - ___ -_- --------- —� ----- - ----- - - -- - -------------- - -_ - -_ -_- - _ ----_ -_---_ -_-_- -- _----_-_ —- -----= ------= - --_ -_-= _-_ =-_ =-_-_- -_--_- -- -_ -_-_ - -_ - -_- - -___- - --- ---______ ____ _ =---= _-= i ■ �1 x ,ei 1 ■ _-_- --- - ---------------- - ------ ---- --- --------------- =- ----------_-_-_ __-------_ _----- ■ - - -- _ --- _ -= -- ==--- =--- - - - - = - = =- -- - =-_=-_-____ ■ __-___ _ _ _________' ■ ■ x 454'OF TYPE'A' BUFFER 5 - 2OVERSTORY TREES 23 - 2„ ��ORNAMENTAL TREES 00—SIVIALL SHRUBS J, x x 56 - - - - ---------- ----------------------------- ------------- _____------------ --------- ------------------- ___ ________ ___ ____ _ =_-_= _-_ --- ------------- ------------ - 1 ----- - - --- - - ----- - - -_- ------------ -- - -- -- = ----= - -------------------- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------------- --_-- _--_------------ - --_ _ _ __- _ __ - -- -- - ---------------- - - - -------------- ------ -- i _ -- -----_- - -_- ------ ------ --- -- - _ -------------=--------- - === -- _____ _______ _ _______ _______ _________ -__ _____ _ = =__ ____ _______ _______ _____ ___ _______ ________ _ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ _____________________________________ i = -----_---__- - _ =_-- - - - - = --- = -----_-__ __ _---_-_ __ _�= Jk ��l -7� ---- - -- - -- - -_ ---- --- - - - -------------- ----_ x ♦ P - - .7 - -- - - - - - - - - -- x - - - - --------------------T-------_--__--__- - ------_-____--__--___--- — + +--__-----___ o--_--___---____-- ■ /-- -_-_-_--==-_-_-� -��-� - - -- ---- - - - ----- - - -- __ _ - _--_ _ ----_ ----_ --_ ---- - - _ -_ _ - _ - --- --- - _ --- -- _40---- - - -- --- - - - --- -t -- - -'--_ _ _ -- -=__- _____-__-= __---__-_- _-__-_-_-_-_-= --- ----------- ---------- A --__ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ x 228' OF TYPE 'A' BUFFER 3 - 2" OVERSTORY TREES 12 - 2" ORNAMENTAL TREES SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" x x 60' • NORTH Inside Outside Architecture Inc. 14165 James Road - Suite 200A Rogers, MN 55374 Phone: 612-237-8355 www.insideoutsidearchitecture.com Project Name: BIG RIVER #445 Monticello, Minnesota COPYRIGHT 2024 This plan is copyrighted and shall be used only for the project shown and shall not be copied or reproduced without written permission from Inside Outside Architecture, Inc. :7 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Paul Kanqas Registration #: 26017 3ignatur. : Project #: 23-018 Date: CITY SUBMITTAL 1 01-08-2024 Revision: Drawn By: PK Checked By: PK Sheet Title: EAST HALF LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT Sheet Number: EAST HALF ENLARGEMENT PLAN: inside utsid-e IMMM ■■■■■■■■1 Architecture .I X Inc. x , x x x x ----------------- -- ----- ,IIYI� �� `� JG- •„'�r --- --- --- -__--_ -� ---------- - --- --_---_--_ -- - -_--- -_-_- --- - - - --- -_- ----- _- -_ _---- - --- - ---- - - - _ - _-_- -- ----- -----_-------------------- ----- --� - --_-_-__--__-----------------_--_ ---------�_--___----- ___ - ----------- ---- ------------- ---- - --_- __-____---_ --- ----------- -- + - - - -- -- ----- --- --------------- --- -- -- ---- -- --- - - - - -- --- - ---------- ---- -- -- - -- -- --- ----- -_- - - - -- - - - -- --- --- - � - -- - --------------- --- --------- - - --- -- - -_-_- - -- - -- -- - ----- ---__-_-_-- =_--_-__-___-- _-________ -----__--M�-----____ f_ - - ---- - -- -- ---- _ -- ■ _- - - -- -- --- - - _- -_-_ _ _� ----------------------- 1416 00A --_ _ _— - - -- _ _- - - --- - - ----- _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _- _ -_-_ - - -__ __ - - - --_ - - -_-_ _ 5 James Road - Suite 2 - ln--=-=-------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Rogers, MN 55374 __--_-_---- V -- rr -- --_ - - - _ - - - - - - - _' - - - - -- _----__--_ -- -- -----_ --_--- ------------_ _ --__ - - ----_ _ ------_------_-------- _ - Phone: 612-237-8355 • __4#4 __ __ _ _____ __ _____ _ I - _� _ -- - - - ---_ _ _--- ) __ --- _---_ - _-------_-__------_ -- _ ____ __= www.insideoutsidearchitecture.com ---------_�-_------------ -- -- - _---__ =------- --------- --_--_-= Project -=-= - BIG RIVER -- - -- - - -L----------------�__--- G - -__-- - #44 5 ______________ _____ ------------ D �1. _________ A $ TM EL � C .5 op _ _- --- --- - -- _- O U T F L 5 -_- - 100 YR H 95r _- _- -,• I Alka -_ -_- -_-_ _ -_- -- - - - - - = - --- - _ - - F==-= ---_ _-- __ -_--_ _ _ --- ----- _ -=- -= _ - - _ _-_-- - - -- - - --- - - ----- - ----- - - ----- - ---- - - -------_ _ _ - _ _ _ ----_ - ; _ -_ --_ --_ _ - - - _ ------------------------- - - -_------- _-_-_____----_- - Monticello, Minnesota --_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_--_-_ _-__ - - _- � _ -___ __ =-- __= - --- --- _--- _----___-- ---- - - - ------�-------------�-- ---_ - -- ---- --- -� - - =ems __- _- _-_- _--__-_- ---- - - --- - - ----- - -_ --- _---_ __----_ _----_ __--- -_- - ----_ - -- - _ --- - - - - - - - _ - - _ - _ - --- _ - - - - - - - - ___- -- - _ � - - _- _ _ _- - - - - - - - - - - - COPYRIGHT 2024 _----_----__________________ - --- ----- -___-- _----- -- _ _-----__-- -- _--_ - -___-_ --_-- _ - - -- ------ - ----- - -- - - - - ------------------- _ __--------------- _---__----- - __-------- -----------_------- ------------ ---_ - - � -- 1 'splan iscopyrighted and shall beused -- ----_ _ _ ----_ - _--- - -----_ --- � - ----_ _ _ --_ _ - -- - - --_ --------_ _ _ -___ ----_ is` �` only for the project shown and ---_ _ _ __----------- ----- - --_ _ _ _ --_ _ _ --_--_----_------_ - - - _ - - - - _ -_-_ -_ - - - - - - - - -_ --- _ - ---- shall not be copied or reproduced without written -- --- - - - - - - - - permission from Inside Outside Architecture, Inc. __- --_ - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = 1 __ - - - - - - �• -- ----------- ---�--------------------------__--____ --__-------- ------------ -------------- F- -- - --- ------------- - - ---------- %-�__----___ --___--___----_- - \ ■---------- Win., ---------------- �- ------------ - - - --_ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ - -_ _ ---- -_ --_ -- _ - _ _ _ --_ _ _ - _ -- _ -- - - --- _ -- � ---- - --_ _ _ ----_ _ -- -_ -- _ ---_ _ _ --_ --_ _ _ -_- _ -- -_ - - - -----_ _ ---- - - _ -- _ -_ -___ _ - - - - U 01 o _ _ -_ _ ----_-_-_ ■ __ _ -- - - - -�+ • I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am + _ _ __ _ __- - _-_ _-_ _ _ - -_- -_ ■ -_ _ - Registered Landscape Architect under the laws ---_ — - ---- - - - - - - - - - ----------- - - -- - - -_ _ __-- __-_ _ ---_ _ __--_ --_--- _ -_ __+ _ _ _ _- of the State of Minnesota. _ __ _ _ -_-_ __ --- - '/7 _ __________ ■ -__ - o• Name:Paul Kangas __-------_ �__-_- - - _ _ - _-_ - - _ - ■ _-_ _ _-_-_ + + 000 Registration #. 26017 -_---_ -_-_--_-==__ ■ -_ --- Sig natur : ZEE _ - _� ] ____ - ____ — ■ = _ -----= Project #: 23-018 \ -• _ - ■ _-- _-_____ \ Date: CITY SUBMITTAL 1 01-08-2024 -7 Revision: _ • - _ _ • _— f -__=_______ ■ -= _-- u v U CE Drawn By: K--------_ - ---- - PK -_-_- -__ ----------- \- = Checked By: PK �' _ _ _ _ = �- — — — Sheet Title: I - - - - __ - -- - __---_ - --- _ -_ _ - --- _ _ --_ - -- - � 6_ --- - - - _ _ _ - - _ +-_ WEST HALF x- --- - - -- - --- ---_----- - - __- -- - - 9 - - - - - - - - - - x x - x - - LANDSCAPE 454'„OF TYPE 'A' BUFFER 0 15' 30' 60' ENLARGEMENT x x 5- 2 OVERSTORY TREES x 23 - 2" ORNAMENTAL TREES Sheet Number: �b�51VIHLL 5 NO* - SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" NORTH WEST HALF ENLARGEMENT PLAN: L I REFER TO PLAN 18" MIN. LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SHRUBS PLACED SO THAT TOP OF CONTAINER SITS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED GRADE. MULCH - 3" DEEP - SEE SPEC LANDSCAPE FABRIC -SEE SPEC. EDGING MATERIAL - SEE SPEC. / EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN - - - - - - - -- PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC. III BUILDING WALL (TYP) 01— SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" PLANTING DETAILS: PLANT SELECTIONS: SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED ONLY IF REQUESTED PRIOR TO BIDDING OF THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AVAILABILITY OF THE SPECIFIED MATERIALS AND INFORM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONCERNS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NURSERY STOCK STANDARDS AS PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN NURSERY AND LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION (ANLA). UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED SHRUB HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE THE ROOT FLARE. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE THE ROOT FLARE ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE A FULL, NATURAL FORM CONSISTENT WITH THE SPECIES. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANT SCHEDULE IF ANY DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. STORAGE OF PLANTS ON CONSTRUCTION SITE: PLANTS SHALL NOT BE STORED ON SITE FOR EXTENDED TIME PERIODS. IF PLANTINGS CANNOT BE PLACED IN THE GROUND, AND WELL WATERED THAT SAME DAY, THE PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE MOIST MULCH COVERING THE ROOTS AT ALL TIMES. PLANTING INSTRUCTIONS: ALL PLANTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE PLANTING DETAILS AS SHOWN IN THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. PARTICULAR ATTENTION WILL BE PAID TO OVERSIZING THE PLANTING HOLE AND CREATION OF A WATERING WELL TO ALLOW SOAKING OF THE PLANTING BACKFILL FOR EACH PLANTING. EDGING AND MAINTENANCE STRIPS: BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS AND MAINTENANCE STRIP AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS SHALL HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED OR AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. MULCHING: A 3" DEPTH OF RIVER ROCK MULCH SHALL BE CLEAN AND FREE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT DIRT, SOIL, OR ORGANIC MATTER THAT WILL PROMOTE WEED GROWTH. HIGH QUALITY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, WITH EDGES OVERLAPPED AT LEAST 12", SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ALL ROCK MULCH. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE A MULCH RING (MINIMUM 48" DIAMETER) OF 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NONE IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. STAKING: STAKING OF THE TREES IS OPTIONAL, BUT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTING ANY TREES THAT FALL OUT OF PLUMB DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD. REMOVAL OF TAGGING: ALL TAGGING AND PLANT LABELS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER PLANTING. BALLED AND BURLAPPED PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE ANY ROPE REMOVED FROM THE TRUCK AND THE TOP OF THE WIRE CAGE REMOVED FROM THE BALL AFTER PLACEMENT IN THE PLANTING PIT. WARRANTY PERIOD: ALL PLANTING SHALL BE COVERED BY A ONE YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD TO COVER REPLACEMENT OF ANY PLANTINGS THAT HAVE DIED OR ARE SHOWING OBVIOUS SIGNS OF STRESS AT THE WARRANTY INSPECTION. REPLACEMENT OF ANY FAILED PLANTINGS INCLUDES RE-ESTABLISHING CLEAN MULCH AROUND ANY REMOVALS AND OFF -SITE DISPOSAL OF ANY MATERIALS. IRRIGATION: ALL PLANTING AREAS, AND MOWN TURF AREAS, SHALL BE COVERED BY AN AUTOMATIC, UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH PROGRAMMABLE CONTROL STATION, RAIN SENSOR, AND SEPARATE ZONES FOR TURF AND PLANTINGS SODDING ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE BLUEGRASS SOD LAID PERPENDICULAR TO ANY SLOPES. STAGGER JOINTS AT LEAST 2' AND STAKE IF NEEDED TO KEEP FROM BEING DISPLACED BY HEAVY RAIN. WARRANTY PERIOD: ALL PLANTING SHALL BE COVERED BY A ONE YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD TO COVER REPLACEMENT OF ANY PLANTINGS THAT HAVE DIED OR ARE SHOWING OBVIOUS SIGNS OF STRESS AT THE WARRANTY INSPECTION. REPLACEMENT OF ANY FAILED PLANTINGS INCLUDES RE-ESTABLISHING CLEAN MULCH AROUND ANY REMOVALS AND OFF -SITE DISPOSAL OF ANY MATERIALS. VARIES QCC DI AKI MULCH - 3" DEPTH EDGER - SEE SPECS. / EDGE VARIES -SEE PLAN III I 12" DEPTH (MIN.) LOAM PLANTING SOIL III LOOSEN ROOTS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLANTING 2 PERENNIAL PLANTING L 1-4 P SCALE: 3/4" =1'-0" O.C. PLANT SPACING P = R = AREA PER PLANT IN SF = 12" 10.5" 0.87 SF 15" 12.7" 1.35 SF " 15.6" 1.95 SF AREA PER PLANT 24 24" 20 8" 3,4646 SF I x— % CENTER OF PLANT P �r P = TYPICAL PLANT SPACING - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE R = PLANT ROW ASSUMING TRIANGULAR SPACING NUMBER OF PLANTS = TOTAL AREA/AREA PER PLANT 3 PERENNIAL SPACING GUIDELINES L 1- 44 SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" ,_�_ . /)F tt x Ir— N O O SYM QTY CITY COMMON NAME DECIDUOUS SHRUBS AWS 12 5 ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA DBH -- 20 DWARF BUSH -HONEYSUCKLE FDO 11 19 FIREDANCE DOGWOOD MKL 5 3 MISS KIM LILAC SWP 11 16 SUMMER WINE PHYSOCARPUS CONIFEROUS SHRUBS DFJ 9 3 DAUB'S FROSTED JUNIPER TYE 7 5 TAUNTON YEW PERENNIALS AND GRASSES BES 10 5 BLACK EYED SUSANS HOF 4 3 HOSTA - FRANCES WILLIAMS HOV -- -- HOSTA - ALBO MARGINATA KFG 15 3 KARL FOERSTER GRASS STD 9 17 STELLA d' ORO DAYLILY WLC 12 3 WALKER'S LOW CATMINT PLANTING SCHEDULE: 3 2 KFG / FTYE1 F7 4 AWS FH 0 F SCIENTIFIC NAME Si)iraea x bumalda 'Anthony Waterer' Diervilla lonicera Cornus sericea 'Bailadeline' Svrinqa oatula 'Miss Kim' Phvsocarous onulifolius 'Seward' Junioerus x ofitzeriana 'MonSan' Taunton x media 'Taunton' Rudbeckia 'Goldsturm' Hosta x'Frances Williams' Hosta x'Albo Marqinata' Calamaqrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' Hemerocallis x 'Stella d' Oro' NeiDeta faassenii 'Walker's Low' _ 10 BES SIZE CONT COMMENTS 24" HGT. POT 5' O.C. 24" HGT. POT 5' O.C. 24" HGT. POT 5' O.C. 24" HGT. POT 5' O.C. 24" HGT. POT 5' O.C. 5 GAL POT 5' O.C. 5 GAL POT 5' O.C. 1 GAL POT 30" O.C. 1 GAL POT 36" O.C. 1 GAL POT 24" O.C. 1 GAL POT 36" O.C. 1 GAL POT 24" O.C. 1 GAL POT 36" O.C. 0 10' 20' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" NORTH Inside Outside Architecture IncL 14165 James Road - Suite 200A Rogers, MN 55374 Phone: 612-237-8355 www.insideoutsidearchitecture.com Project Name: BIG RIVER #445 Monticello, Minnesota COPYRIGHT 2024 This plan is copyrighted and shall be used only for the project shown and shall not be copied or reproduced without written permission from Inside Outside Architecture, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Paul Kangas Registration #: 26017 Signatur Project #: 23-018 Date: CITY SUBMITTAL 1 01-08-2024 Revision: Drawn By: PK Checked By: PK Sheet Title: FOUNDATION PLANTING PLAN AND DETAILS Sheet Number: L 1 M4 PLANTING NOTES: ENLARGEMENT AREA 'A' (SHRUB & PERENNIAL PLANTINGS): w F_� LAJ INTERSTATE 94 a 6% CS, (k .3 .2 ' 1.5 1.0 0. 0.5 a . - + , .1 2.1 i.s i.o 1.1 1.6 2.4 3.4 3.9 2.7 1.9 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 b.4 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.2 3.2 3.6 2.6 1.8 1.2 0. 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.5 3.6 .1 3.5 2.4 1.6 1.1 3.7 �.9 �.3 �.2 �7.2 U.2 �.2 �.3 �.5 b"�l.i l.n G.v ,.5 �1-�»L.G 1.6 1.1 G.a v.� u.� v.a u.� l.i 1..; I.� I.a I: - - --- --- - - - 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.5 0.9 1.9 1.9 2.4 3.1 3.7 3.4 2.7 2.1 1.7 1. 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.6 2.0 2.5 3.2 3.6 3.1 2.5 1.9 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.6 0.9 1.9 2.0 2.9 2.8 3.9 3.2 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.1 2. 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.7i )�f1.6 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.1 2. 2.0 1. 0. 0 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.6 1.0 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 *.l 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.3 2.7 2. 3 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.9p 1. 1a.9 *.0 2.2 Y 2.3 .1 1.7 1.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 8,.9 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 .B \ 1-� 0 2.6 2 2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1. 2.0 :.1 1.8 1. 0. 1.7 1.7 1.6 / e 1.3 1.4 1.9 5 �•5 ri 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 y.2 1.66 e 3.2 5x 3 2.8 2 3 - 0.9 1.7 2.0 i.l 1.7 1.2 0.7 a a 1.7 1.8 1.6 LF 1.0 1.1 1.2 1 3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.7 2.0 2.5 3. ." ? '! 3A 3' 2.9 2 4 �.8 1.0 1.4 1.8 >. i.l 1.7 1.1 0 7 0. ��,� a 3.n 11.7 2.0 1.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1 1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1. 9i� 1.8 2.1 2.5 3.T*S..f 3,4 2.9 2 3 1 F77E 1.0 1.0 1.7 S '.2 1.8 1.1 0.5 0.2 1.6 2.0 2.3 \ 0.9 1.0 1.2 1 2 1.2 1.1 .0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.5 3,2 2.8 2 4 2.0 1.` 1.1 1.4 1.8 2. .5 2.0 1.0 0.9 *.2 0.1 fi ) _ 1.7 2.2 3.0 0.9 1.2 1.3 1 3 1.3 1 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.' 1. 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.9 3.9 3..1 2.8 2 4 2.1.E 1.2 1.7 2.1 3.4 2.0 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 .3 1.8 2.4 3.8 / .8 1.0 1.3 1.4 11 4 1.4 .4 1.2 1 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.� +.5 1.9 2.2 2.7 3.1 3.6 3.7 3.7 3,4 2.9 2 5 2.1 l.E� 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.6 �4.0 1.9 0.8 0.9 0.2 .l 0 1 C_AA I ry p 5 AA 1.3 1.8 2.5 4.0 / 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.4 1 5 1.4 1.9 .2 1.0 0.9 0.8 L 9 1. 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.7 3.8 3.8 3 6 3.0 2 5 2.1 1.- 1L 1.33 1.44 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.9 4.1 3.1 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.3 1.7 2.3 3.2 \ 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.9 1 4 1.9 1.3 .l L 0 0.9 0.8 0.8 �l .l ].9 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.9 3.6 3.7 3 6 3.1 2 5 2.1 l.' 1.9 1.9 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.8 1.7 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 +.1 Sx2 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.5 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1 3 1.3 1.2 L.0 * 8 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.7 3 6 3.1 2 5 2.1 1."_ 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.3 2.5 5 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.0 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 1 1 1.1 1.0 ).9 8 +�3 1.7 2.2 2.6 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.7 3 5 3.0 2 5 '--\'_ 1 Gi 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.5 1.7 1.0 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1 0 1.0 0.9 ).8 + 7 � 2.1 2.6 3.^ ___ ?_6 3-_6 3-3 2.9 2 5 '2�-!i 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.5 .0 1.3 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.2 V 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1 0 1.0 0.9 ).8 7 0 .s i,,i 2.1 2.5 2.9 T 3 3.3 3 i 2.8 2I4 2. 22.11 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.0 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.2 \\\ 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1 0 1.0 0.9 ).8 * 7 1.2 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.8 3.2 3.9 3.3 3311 2.7 2,4 2.2 2. 2.1 2.3 2.9 2\ .9 2.1 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 .0 %61,.7 ` * 7 1 0 1.0 0.9 .8 �� 2 2.0 2.4 2.9 3.4 3.►� 2.8 2,4 2.3 2." 2.3 2.5 2 3.8 2.0 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.31.6 / 0. 0.8 0.9 1.0 ��lll // 1.20 2.0 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1 2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0:7 0].2 1.6 2.0 2.9 3.0 3.3 3.1 3.9 3 2.9 2,5 2.9 2..! 2.4 2.5 +.i .�9.0 1.8 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 *.0 +.0 AA3 1.2 1.6 2.1 +.5 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1 4 1.3 1.2 1.0 0. 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.9 ].l 1.5 1.8 2.3 2.B 3.2 11:5x .3 3 -0 2-4 '2 2.3 4.1 2.8 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 I \ 1.2 1.7 2.2 3.3 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.9 1 4 1.9 .3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.7 2.1 2.7 3.0 - 3.0 3.0 3 0 2.7 2,4 * 9 c2. 2 5 2.8 2.6 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 *.0 0.0 1.3 1 8 2.5 /1 \ O.a 1.0 1.3 .4 1.9 1. 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.8 2 7 2.3 2,1 2.2 2.0 1.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 3 " _- - c 3 1.7 2.3 .7 .8 1. 1.2 1.3 1.4 1 3 1.3 1. + 9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 % 2.1 1.9 1 8 i 1.8 1.8 1.7 +.3 0.8 0.9 0.3 0.2 A 1-2 1-6 2-� 2_R 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 .3 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.9 1.2 1 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 1. 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1 1.4 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.6 1. � .9 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0. 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.7 0. 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0. Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description LLF Luminaire Mounting Lumens Height C H E L S EA ROAD W CI 2 AA5 Single RSX1 LED P4 40K R5 0.910 16793 25 9 AA3 Single RSX1 LED P4 40K R3 0.910 16359 25 3 AA5x2 Back -Back RSX1 LED P4 40K R5 0.910 16793 25 a .r%I2�1 •ecteftei www.stinsonelectricinc.com BIG RIVER 445 MONTICELLO, MN DATE: 01-02-2024 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED MASTER ELECTRICIAN UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ROBERT ARCHAMBAULT REGISTRATION NO: AM692332 .0 0.0 �.o 0. 0 0.0 DATE: 0 STINSON electric inc. 612.788.0244 750 4th St. NW New Brighton, MN 55112 01-02-2024 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: C2xxxx CAD DWG FILE: DRAWN BY: CW CHK'D BY: BA COPYRIGHT: SHEET TITLE SITE PHOTOMETRIC SITE PHOTOMETRIC E5.1 1 /32"= 1'-0" E5el EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE T.O. PARAPET 120' - 0" T.O. STOREFRONT 111' - 0" Bk-1 FINISHED FLOOR 100, - 0" WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" T.O. PARAPET 120' - 0" T.O. PARAPET LADDER 116' - 0" T.O. STOREFRONT 111' - 0" FINISHED FLOOR 100, - 0" �i EAST EX I LKIUK LLEVA I IUN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" T.O. PARAPET 120' - 0" T.O. STOREFRONT 111' - 0" FINISHED FLOOR 100' - 0" 3 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ------------------------- -- - T.O. PARAPET 120' - 0" 13 1 13 T.O. STOREFRONT 111' - 0" <3> FINISHED FLOOR 100, - 0" 4 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" MONTICELLO STARBUCKS SHELL BUILDING TAG TAG MANUF. COLOR REMARKS S/B I/B BK-1 MUTUAL MATERIALS PEWTER MISSION RUNNING BOND I MORTAR GC GC PH: 888-688-8250 COLOR: SM100 GRAY C-1 INCRETE SYSTEMS SOFT GRAY CAST -IN -PLACE BOARD FORMED GC GC FREE OF ROCK POCKETS AND BURNOUT MARKS EIFS DRYVIT PH: SW 7030 ANEW SANDBLAST TEXTURE GC GC 734-276-0404 GRAY MTL-1 PAC CLAD OR EQ MT0028 FLAT PRE -FINISHED GC GC BLACK WD-1 IDENTITY WOOD 1200 PRETZEL GC GC PRODUCTS PH: MEDIUM BROWN 770-704-7140 WITH DARK BROWN KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY, COLOR TO MATCH RAL#7021 MATTE BLACK 2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING, COLOR TO MATCH RAL#7021 MATTE BLACK 3 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM, TYP., COLOR TO MATCH RAL#7021 MATTE BLACK 4 DRYVIT EIFS SYSTEM, SANDBLAST TEXTURE, COLOR TO MATCH SW 7030 ANEW GRAY WOOD CLADDING, IDENTITY WOOD PRODUCTS 1200 - PRETZEL MEDIUM BROWN 5 WITH DARK BROWN GLAZE, 1/16 REVEAL, SEALED FACE AND BACK 5/8 THICK X 7-1/4 WIDE. ALUMINUM TRIM POWDER COATED TO MATCH CLADDING. 6 MUTUAL MATERIALS PEWTER MISSION RUNNING BOND, SM770 SABLE COLORED MORTAR 7 1 EXTERIOR ROOF LADDER WITH LOCKING GATE PAINTED RAL#7021 MATTE BLACK 8 CANOPY DOWNSPOUTS CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN TYP., COLOR TO MATCH RAL#7021 MATTE BLACK 9 1 ROOF OVERFLOW SCUPPER TO MATCH CANOPY 10 INSULATED HOLLOW METAL SERVICE DOOR AND FRAME, PAINT TO MATCH RAL#7021 MATTE BLACK 11 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY. READY ACCESS 275 1/4" TEMPERED PICK-UP WINDOW WITH AIR CURTAIN, COLOR 12 TO MATCH RAL#7021 MATTE BLACK. WINDOW SHELF. ALL DRIVE-THRU WINDOW EQUIPMENT (WINDOW, AIR CURTAIN, AND SHELF) ARE TO BE READY ACCESS 11 MODELS BLOCKING FOR FUTURE TENANT SIGNAGE, COORDINATE ALL FINAL LOCATIONS 13 WITH TENANT SIGNAGE VENDOR SHOP DRAWINGS. GC TO PROVIDE J-BOX W/ PULL STRING FOR FUTURE BUILDING SIGNAGE. GC TO PROVIDE SIGNAGE DISCONNECT ON INSIDE FACE OF WALL EIFS \WD-1i EXTERIOR MATERIALS BREAKDOWN STOREFRONT BRICK WOOD EIFS METAL OVERALL 13% SF 28% SF 18% SF 36% SF 5% SF EAST 4% SF 47% SF 6% SF 39% SF 4% SF WEST 22% SF 10% SF 24% SF 36% SF 8% SF NORTH 11% SF 38% SF 18% SF 30% SF 3% SF SOUTH 15% SF 15% SF 24% SF 40% SF 5% SF EXTERIOR SIGNAGE PROPOSED ALLOWED OVERALL 55 SF - EAST 0 SF - WEST 15 SF - NORTH 20 SF - SOUTH 20 SF - BK-1 0 WIILKUS V�h'z' r. HITECT 12/14/2024 SD-003 DIVISION 25, LLC 1620 WATERFORD COURT SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 T.O. TOWER PARAPET 120' - 8" T.O. PARAPET - 119' - 4" (MTL-2X7 19 T.O. PARAPET LADDER 115' - 4" 18 PT-2 TYP. B.O. EXT SOFFIT FRAMING 110' - 8" T.O. STOREFRONT / 24 110' - 0" B.O. CANOPY 107' - 2" BR-1 ip FINISHED FLOOR 100' - 0" EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" T.O. PARAPET 119' - 4" T.O. PARAPET LADDER 115' - 4" B.O. EXT SOFFIT FIR 110' - 8" FINISHED FLOOR 100, - 0" 2 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" (I T.O. TOWER 120' - 8" T.O. PARAPE 119' - 4" T.O. PAR 115' - 4" B.O. EXT SOF 110' - 8" T.O. STOREF 110' - 0" FINISHED FL, 100, - 0" 3 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS u TYP. TYP. TYP. PT-1 TYP. ). CANOPY } 107' - 2" P EXT. MATERIALS BREAKDOWN STOREFRONT BRICK EIFS METAL OVERALL 17% SF 33% SF 39% SF 11 % SF EAST 25% SF 29% SF 44% SF 2% SF WEST 8% SF 40% SF 36% SF 16% SF NORTH 5% SF 46% SF 35% SF 14% SF SOUTH 34% SF 13% SF 38% SF 15% SF EXTERIOR SIGNAGE PROPOSED ALLOWED OVERALL 76SF - EAST 38 SF - WEST 0 SF - NORTH 0 SF - SOUTH 38 SF - T.O. TOWER PARAPET 120' - 8" T.O. STOREFRONT 110' - 0" T.O. PARAF 119' - 4" T.O. PARAF 115' - 4" B.O. EXT S( 110' - 8" FINISHED F 100, - 0" 4 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" MONTICELLO CHIPOTLE SHELL BUILDING EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FINISH MATERIAL COLOR REMARKS BR-1 4" BRICK VENEER VELOUR IRONSPOT MAGANESE MTL-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING PPG #1001-6 "KNIGHT'S ARMOR" MATCH ADJACENT FINISH MTL-2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING PPG: #1012-2 "FOG" TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH PT-1 PAINT PPG #1001-6 "KNIGHT'S ARMOR" FLAT FINISH PT-2 PAINT PPG: #1012-2 "FOG" FLAT FINISH KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 FACE BRICK VENEER - RUNNING BOND - REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2 MBCI METAL PANELS. 3 EIFS 4 THERMALLY BROKEN ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLAZING - CAULK AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER OF OPENINGS. 5-'24 GAUGE PREFINISHED METAL COPING. 6 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY W/ INTEGRAL LIGHTING. 7 PREFINISHED DARK BRONZE ALUMINUM PASS-THRU WINDOW WITH INTEGRATED INTERIOR AIR CURTAIN, TRANSOM AND SIDELITES - CAULK AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER OF OPENING. 8 LED CHANNEL LIGHT (E4) - 126" IN TOTAL LENGTH 9 EXTERIOR EMERGENCY LIGHT (E2). 10 8" CONCRETE SAFETY BOLLARD. 11 ISTAINLESS STEEL COW TOUNGE OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN DISCHARGE. 12 I GAS METER 13 FROST PROOF WALL HYDRANT. 14 ELECTRICAL METER. 15 ELECTRICAL FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH. 16 INSULATED HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME -CAULK AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER OF OPENING. 17 TCONCRETE SPLASH BLOCK. HATCHED AREA INDICATES EXTENTS OF BLOCKING TO BE PROVIDED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR - 18 PROVIDE ELECTRICAL ACCESS AS REQUIRED - COORDINTE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS WITH TENANT SIGNAGE VENDOR. 19 EIFS JOINT - REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR SPACING REQUIREMENTS. 20 FACE BRICK VENEER - SOLDIER COURSE - REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 21 MASONRY CONTROL JOINTS - REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SPACING REQUIREMENTS 22 I RAISED PARAPET BEYOND -EXTERIOR FINISHES TO WRAPAROUND ON EXPOSED SIDES 23 EXTERIOR ROOF LADDER WITH LOCKING GATE. 24 6" HIGH VINYL BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS - COORDINATE REQUIREMENTS WITH AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. WALL PACK LIGHT I ARAPET 120' - 8" WIILKUS V�h,z, r. HITECT 12/18/2023 A-700 DIVISION 25, LLC 1620 WATERFORD COURT SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 20 l T.O. TOWER PARAPET - L -FYP - - - - - - - - - - - - 120' - 8" T.O. PARAPET _ ■ 119' - 4" (MTL-2)< 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 = T.O. PARAPET LADDER18 01, 3� TYP. B.O. EXT SOFFIT FRAMING 110' - 8" ■� _�_�_�_ T.O. STOREFRONT 24 110' - 0"---------")XX .�� ■■■■■■■■ B.O. CANOPY < _ _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 107' - 2" IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII -- -- -- IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 9 -�� = `� �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII _--_ � _--_ -_ _--_ � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII -- -- _ -- IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII + I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII------------------111111111111111111 FINISHED FLOOR 100' - 0" 4 21 EAST ELEVATION TYP. SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" 18 PT-2 5 MTL-2) <19> 2 PT-1 5 (MTL-1 T MTL-2) T.O. TOWER PARAPET 120' - 8" T.O. PARAPET 119' - 4" - - � r �(PT-2) T.O. PARAPET LADDER Eel /// ✓ 'MM010016W wzzzlolo 20 B.O. EXT SOFFIT FRAMING _ _ L- 110'- 8" =� T.O. STOREFRONT OT ti FINISHED FLOORL 100, - 0" 17 11 WEST ELEVATION 2 SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" (MTL-1 5 5 1 TL-2) T.O. TOWER PARAPET 120' - 8" T.O. PARAPET 119' - 4" 18 = PT-2 3 T.O. PARAPET LAD R 115' - 4" 1 yP. PT-1 20 - TYP. � B.O. EXT SOFFIT FRAMING - - 110' - 8" T.O. STOREFRON 110' - 0" 6 BR-1 1 TYP. �� 4 ► FINISHED FLOOR 100, - 0" 25 SOUTH ELEVATION 3 SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Wl I KHS r. �HITECTS <23 TYP. TYP. W �o� r �mmr 9! I 44,V4 < > < a B.O. CANOPY 4 107' - 2" P 6 BR-1 EXT. MATERIALS BREAKDOWN EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE m a&=" STOREFRONT BRICK EIFS METAL FINISH MATERIAL COLOR REMARKS OVERALL 17% SF 33% SF 39% SF 11 % SF BRA 4" BRICK VENEER VELOUR IRONSPOT MAGANESE EAST 25% SF 29% SF 44% SF 2% SF WEST 8% SF 40% SF 36% SF 16% SF MTL-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING PPG #1001-6 "KNIGHT'S ARMOR" TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH NORTH 5% SF 46% SF 35% SF 14% SF MTL-2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING PPG: #1012-2 "FOG" _ TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH SOUTH 34% SF 13% SF 38% SF 15% SF _ PT-1 PAINT PPG #1001-6 "KNIGHT'S ARMOR" FLAT FINISH PT-2 tPAINT PPG: #1012-2 "FOG" FLAT FINISH EXTERIOR SIGNAGE KEYNOTE LEGEND PROPOSED ALLOWED 1 FACE BRICK VENEER - RUNNING BOND - REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL OVERALL 152 SF - INFORMATION. EAST 38 SF - WEST 38 SF - 2 MBCI METAL PANELS. NORTH 38 SF - 3 EIFS SOUTH 38 SF - THERMALLY BROKEN ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLAZING - 4 CAULK AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER OF OPENINGS. 5 24 GAUGE PREFINISHED METAL COPING. 6 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY W/ INTEGRAL LIGHTING. 7 PREFINISHED DARK BRONZE ALUMINUM PASS-THRU WINDOW WITH INTEGRATED INTERIOR AIR CURTAIN, TRANSOM AND SIDELITES - CAULK AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER OF OPENING. 8 LED CHANNEL LIGHT (E4) - 126" IN TOTAL LENGTH 9 EXTERIOR EMERGENCY LIGHT (E2). 10 8" CONCRETE SAFETY BOLLARD. 11 ISTAINLESS STEEL COW TOUNGE OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN DISCHARGE. 12 GAS METER 13 FROST PROOF WALL HYDRANT. 14 ELECTRICAL METER. 15 ELECTRICAL FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH. 16 INSULATED HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME - CAULK AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER OF OPENING. 17 CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCK. AREA INDICATES EXTENTS OF BLOCKING TO BE PROVIDED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR - E18HATCHED PROVIDE ELECTRICAL ACCESS AS REQUIRED - COORDINTE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS WITH TENANT SIGNAGE VENDOR. 19 EIFS JOINT - REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR SPACING REQUIREMENTS. FACE BRICK VENEER - SOLDIER COURSE - REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL 20 INFORMATION. 21 MASONRY CONTROL JOINTS - REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SPACING REQUIREMENTS 22 RAISED PARAPET BEYOND - EXTERIOR FINISHES TO WRAP AROUND ON EXPOSED SIDES. 23 EXTERIOR ROOF LADDER WITH LOCKING GATE. 24 6" HIGH VINYL BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS - COORDINATE REQUIREMENTS WITH AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 25 WALL PACK LIGHT (E3). T MTL-2 TO PARAPET 119' - 4" 18 ► T.O. PARAPET LADDER 115' - 4" PT-2 3 TYP. B.O. EXT SOFFIT FRAMING 110'-8" 9 BR-1 20 FINISHED FLOOR 100, - 0" 4 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" MONTICELLO CHIPOTLE SHELL BUILDING 12/18/2023 A-700 19 <�MTL-2 -R===� 1 i i I �r T.O. TOWER PARAPET 120' - 8" DIVISION 25, LLC 1620 WATERFORD COURT SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 Big River 445 Retail Development SSTS Sz TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY in Monticello, MN September St", 2023 BIG RIVER 445 RETAIL DEVELOPMENT MONTICELLO, MN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SEPTEMBER S", 2023 Prepared For: Division 25, LLC 706 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Prepared By: SSTS, LLC 952-212-7625 PROJECT NO. 2023_024 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota: Katie A Schmidt, P.E. Date: Lic. No.: Table of Contents I. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................1 II. Existing Conditions.........................................................................................................................3 A. Study Area Intersections................................................................................................................... 3 B. Roadway Descriptions...................................................................................................................... 3 C. Data Collection and Existing Traffic Volumes.................................................................................3 III. No -Build Alternative.......................................................................................................................6 A. Background Growth.......................................................................................................................... 6 B. Anticipated Improvements for No -Build Conditions........................................................................ 6 C. Results of Analysis........................................................................................................................... 6 IV. Build Alternative............................................................................................................................. 9 A. Site -Generated Traffic....................................................................................................................... 9 B. Trip Distribution and Assignment..................................................................................................... 9 C. Build Traffic Volumes...................................................................................................................... 9 V. Operational Analysis........................................................................................................................13 A. Intersection Operational Description..............................................................................................13 B. Results of Analysis — 2027 Conditions...........................................................................................14 C. Results of Analysis — 2045 Conditions...........................................................................................15 D. Assessment of Additional Development — West Side of the Site...................................................16 VI. Summary and Recommendations................................................................................................17 List of Tables Table 1. Study Area Intersections................................................................................................................. 3 Table 2. Roadway Descriptions.................................................................................................................... 3 Table3. Trip Generation...............................................................................................................................9 Table4.2027 Operations............................................................................................................................14 Table5.2045 Operations............................................................................................................................15 List of Figures Figure1. Vicinity Map.................................................................................................................................. 1 Figure2. Site Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure3. Existing Geometrics...................................................................................................................... 4 Figure4. Existing Traffic Volumes.............................................................................................................. 5 Figure 5. 2027 No -Build Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................... 7 Figure 6. 2045 No -Build Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................... 8 Figure7. Trip Assignment..........................................................................................................................10 Figure 8. 2027 Build Traffic Volumes........................................................................................................ I I Figure 9.2045 Build Traffic Volumes........................................................................................................12 TECHNICAL APPENDICES (Available Upon Request) A. Traffic Counts B. Trip Generation Calculations C. Detailed Results of the Operational Analysis I. Introduction An approximately 20-acre site (termed "Proposed Project" in this study) is proposed to be developed in Monticello, Wright County, MN. The Proposed Project is comprised of a mix of retail land uses. Construction of the Proposed Project is anticipated to start in 2024 and assumed to be complete in 2026. The Proposed Project is located to the south of Interstate 94 and north of Chelsea Rd W, just west of CSAH 18 (Fenning Ave). The site location is illustrated on Figure 1, "Vicinity Map". Access to the site is proposed via four access driveways on Chelsea Rd W. The easternmost access, Access 1, is approximately 500' east of the CSAH 18/Chelsea Rd W traffic signal. Accesses 2 through 4 are located further west on Chelsea Rd W. The site layout and access locations are illustrated on the Concept Site Plan, Figure 2. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of traffic generated by the Proposed Project on the operations and safety of the adjacent roadway. The study focuses on the roads and intersections that provide direct and indirect access to/from the site. This study details the existing and future roadway conditions at studied intersections and access points and includes traffic volumes, lane geometrics and traffic operational analysis results. Recommendations regarding roadway improvements to accommodate site -generated traffic, as well as the anticipated growth in background traffic are included, as necessary. This study focuses on the following years to account for full buildout of the Proposed Project and includes forecast of No -build conditions and trip generation estimates to be included with the Build conditions: • Year 2027 — This year is studied for the full build scenario to provide a thorough assessment of traffic and to address potential traffic concerns. • Year 2045 — This year is studied assuming full construction of the Proposed Project and is considered a planning level analysis to correspond with the current planning year horizon. Big River 445 Development Page 1 September 5', 2023 94 " y IMP x f r Scnc01.81, Ii 500 --------------- L< .10 Figure 2 - Site Plan (By Others) Big River 445 Development Page 2 September 5', 2023 II. Existing Conditions A. Study Area Intersections Study area intersections were defined with input from the City of Monticello. Table 1 lists the five study area intersections, associated existing traffic control and date of turning movement counts (further described in the Data Collection & Existing Traffic Volumes section below). Table 1. Studv Area Intersections Study Intersection Control I Date of Turning Movement Count CSAH 18 (Fenning Ave) & Highway 94 WB Ramps/E 7th St Signal Thursday, July 27th, 2023 CSAH 18 (Fenning Ave) & Highway 94 EB Ramps/Chelsea Rd Signal Thursday, July 27th, 2023 CSAH 18 (Fenning Ave) & Meadow Oak Ave Roundabout Thursday, July 27th, 2023 CSAH 18 (Fenning Ave) & School Blvd Roundabout Thursday, July 27th, 2023 Count Road 34 & Hemlock Ave NE Roundabout Thursday, July 27th, 2023 B. Roadway Descriptions The existing conditions of the study area roadways are noted in Table 2. Additionally, Figure 3 shows the existing lane geometry and traffic control at the study intersections. Table 2. Roadwav D Multimodal Roadway Functional Class Typical Section Posted Speed AADT (Year)* Amenities CSAH 18 2-Lane Divided Trail on E and W Minor Arterial 45 mph 8,412 (2022) (MnDOT) (Fenning Ave) Urban Sides (Varies) 3-Lane Undivided Trail on N Side Chelsea Rd W Major Collector 45 mph 5,020 (2023) (PM Count) Urban Sidewalk on S Side 40 mph/ Schoold Blvd/ 3-Lane Undivided Minor Arterial 30 mph When Trail on N Side 5,831 (2022) (MnDOT) Jamison Ave NE Urban Children Present Local Road (to the South)/ 2-Lane Undivided Fallon Ave NE 30 mph Trail on E Side 4,260 (2023) (PM Count) Major Collector (North) Rural 2-Lane Undivided Sidewalk on North Meadow Oak Ave Local Road 30 mph 1,430 (2023) (PM Count) Urban Side *AADT Sources: (MnDOT) from MnDOT's Traffic Mapping Application (PM Count) from assuming PM counts are —10% of ADT, due to lack of recent AADT counts C. Data Collection and Existing Traffic Volumes AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at all study area intersections on Thursday, July 27t'', 2023. The AM peak traffic hour was found to generally occur from 7:00 - 8:00 AM and the PM peak traffic hour was found to occur from 4:30 - 5:30 PM (See Figure 4, Existing Traffic Volumes). It is noted that these July counts do not include school traffic from the nearby Little Mountain Elementary and Monticello Highschool. Eastview Education Center does have summer programing and it is assumed the collected AM and PM traffic is representative of the school year. Additional school traffic is considered and added to the 2027 No -Build volumes, which is further detailed in the No -Build section. Big River 445 Development Page 3 September 5', 2023 LEGEND 41 T r► Lane Geometry N XXX' Storage Length (Approximate) aTraffic Signal Control 0 Roundabout Control Q'iw — w; I c �300' N N 4- �.► r300' I-94 W 6 Ramps 260' M M 300' c - LL 200' N M 4- S7 .� 11 �►� �250' h I-94 E6 Ramps 250'� l --►11 250'-� N air' �SChOOI1BIVd ` J� 7 Y� Figure 3 - Existing Geometrics Big River 445 Development Page 4 September 5", 2023 • `o T r m 2 t—23 (73) 4—96 (210) +) 1 L+ r 29 �29) Chelsea Rd (107) 46 _* 4) t (180) 93 -+ T a (32) 20 v a LO r LEGEND {1 T r► Traffic Movement N xxx (xxx) Peak Hr Volumes: AM (PM) aTraffic Signal Control 0 Roundabout Control w ry AL161 (319) ALL +-73 (220) 4 1 L+ r 7 (5) 9ch nnl (123) 130 +j t j♦ (130) 51 T rn (28) 7 T N r v a sa (252) � fi0 {144) V V tV OO r O [O M 00 +) 4 �-67 (i I-94W 6 Ramps 39 (74) 28 +j (37) 13 -♦ T M (140) 69 G CO `j c t52 {112) O ti T T T +-7 (5) S7 4 1 L+ r 20 (31) 1-94 E6 Ramps (113) 18 J 4) t I4 (60) 64 - T 47 47 r T (121) 39 � o�Lo T a -- c T T a t46 (40) ni rn ua 4-0(0) MDa k Ave (19) 17 J 4) t j+ (1) 0-+LO (12) 8 Figure 4 - Existing Traffic Volumes Big River 445 Development Page 5 September 5", 2023 III. No -Build Alternative To address the impacts of a development on the surrounding roadway system, it is necessary to predict the traffic that would be present on the roadway system at the time of completion of the Proposed Project, without the inclusion of the Proposed Project. This is considered the No -Build scenario, and serves as a basis with which to compare Build scenarios. In this study two design years were analyzed 2027 and 2045, the current planning year horizon. A. Background Growth Review of Wright County's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)l helped to develop background traffic volumes. It is estimated that traffic in the study area is expected to increase by approximately 1.0% per year between now and year 2045. This was interpolated using the 2016 and 2040 daily traffic forecasts for anticipated growth on the study area. It is noted that the ADT of the Proposed Project was removed from the 2040 forecasts for the growth rate calculation as to not include the project in No -Build Conditions. As mentioned in the data collection section, existing turning movement counts were collected in July, 2023 when school was not in session. To accurately represent typical weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions, school traffic from the nearby Little Mountain Elementary and Monticello Highschool was estimated per ITE's Trip Generation Manual' and distributed through the roadway network for 2027 and 2045 No -Build conditions. B. Anticipated Improvements for No -Build Conditions Review of County and City plans indicate no major future projects in the study area that would impact traffic operations. It is noted there are planned safety improvements for School Boulevard with enhanced ped crossings, LED speed signs and trail improvements. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the No -Build traffic volumes with the growth rate applied to the existing traffic volumes and with the inclusion of school traffic for years 2027 and 2045, respectively. C. Results of Analysis The study area intersections identified in Section II were analyzed for the 2027 and 2045 No -Build scenarios. Complete discussion of the results of these analyses is provided in Section V — Operational Analysis, where a comparison with corresponding design year Build alternatives is made. 1 Wright County's Long Range Transportation Plan — Wright County, Updated Nov 2020, Studv Link Z Trip Generation Manual, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 111h Edition Big River 445 Development Page 6 September 5', 2023 T V 24 (76 r M 100 (219) LO + 1 L+ r 30 (30) Chelsea Rd (111)48* t r* (187) 97 -+ T a (46) 88 -- a LEGEND {1 T r► Traffic Movement N xxx (xxx) Peak Hr Volumes: AM (PM) aTraffic Signal Control 0 Roundabout Control w P:7. T T N LL t 157 (332) 144 (242) +) 1 4 r 7 (5) 9ch nnl (136) 156 -f +j t (149) 94 -+ m (43) 49 -- N a r v v I c �` t 92 �262) �fi2 �75D) Sri o V o T T M h OMO +) 4 �-83 (72W I-94 W 6 Ramps 39 (77) 29 +j - (39) 14 -♦ N a (146) 72 ' m c t 54 (117) ty r +-7 (5) 34 (35) .� 1 4 r 1-94 E6 Ramps (125) 39 J 4) t I* r u7 O [62) 56 -* ^° ni r �726) 41 � oo T a t48 �42) 4-0(0) F +f 1 4 23 (20) Meadow Da k Ave (20) 18 +) t j+ (1) 0 (12) 8-- Figure 5 - 2027 No -Build Traffic Volumes Big River 445 Development Page 7 September 5", 2023 `o N T r tiLL29 (91) P.- r 119 {261) +) 1 L+ r 36 {3fi) Chelsea Rd (133) 57 --t 4) t I" (224) 116 � LO T + (53) 93 a ti LEGEND {1 T r► Traffic Movement N xxx (xxx) Peak Hr Volumes: AM (PM) aTraffic Signal Control 0 Roundabout Control M w V 'n 1' AL188 (397) +-158 (287) T1 00 r �J 4 1 L+ �— 9 (6) 9ch ool (160) 183 +j t j♦ (176) 106 r (49) 50 T (� a a v L v M r N T V 47 N O IX1 r L+ r 97(144) +f -94 W 6 Ramps 39 (92) 35 J +j t Ch WA (46) 16 -♦ a r ye (174) 86 -- 0000 V i `` c - r a r LL t 65 {139) _ +-9 (6) r .� 1 4 38 {41) r 1-94 E6 Ramps {148)43 J 4) t I4 M 47 r {75) 67 - N N {151)49� r N r f0 t 57 (50) N r +-0 (0) +f 1 4 27 (24) Meadow Dak (24) 21 J + t j+ (1) 0 � N w (f5) 10 V Figure 6 - 2045 No -Build Traffic Volumes Big River 445 Development Page 8 September 5", 2023 IV. Build Alternative A. Site -Generated Traffic The number of vehicle trips generated by the Proposed Project were estimated for the weekday daily, and AM and PM traffic peak hours using the data and methodologies contained in the Trip Generation Manual and the Trip Generation Handbook. Table 3 summarizes trip generation estimates. Shared and pass -by trips were considered in the estimates. Shared trips account for the complimentary nature between the land uses of the Proposed Project (i.e., visiting multiple stores in one site visit). Pass -by trips are trips that are attracted to the site from existing traffic already passing on adjacent roadways. These pass -by trips are accounted for in the turning movements at the access locations and adjacent roadway as they enter and exit the site, but do not result in an overall increase in traffic in the study area. It is noted that approximately 40% of the pass -by trips are expected to come from Interstate 94 and these do increase traffic in the study area. Table 3. TAD Generation Land Use Type Land Use Code Size Trips Generated: AM Peak I Enter Exit PM Peak Enter Exit Weekday ADT Supermarket Retail 850 55,000 s.f. 93 64 246 246 5,161 Gas/Service Station Retail 944 12 fuel pos. 62 62 83 83 2,064 Hair Salon Retail 918 7,200 s.f. 7 2 2 9 104 Animal HospitalNet Clinic Medical 640 7,200 s.f. 18 9 10 15 155 Drive-in Bank Retail 912 2 windows 10 7 27 28 250 Fast Food - w/Drive Thru Retail 934 2,330 s.f. 53 51 40 37 1,089 Tire Store Retail 848 10,638 s.f. 18 10 17 23 295 Automated Car Wash Retail 948 1 tunnel 5 5 39 39 775 Oil Change Shop Retail 941 3 positions 6 3 8 6 120 Coffee/Donut Shop - w/Drive Thru Retail 937 2,550 s.f. 112 107 50 50 1,361 Fast Food - w/Drive Thru Retail 934 9,500 s.f. 216 208 163 151 4,441 Totals - Gross 599 27 6851,371686 15,815 ,126 Shared Trips 120 1 105 137 1 137 3,163 225 274 Pass -By Trips 223 I 223 244 1 244 6,634 445 489 257 304 305 Totals - Net 456199 6I $ 6,018 Per the data and methodologies in Trin Generation. I I' Edition and Trin Generation Handbook. 3'd Edition, published by ITE Shared trips were calculated using the Trip Generation Handbook and assumed to by 20% for retail uses. Pass -by trips were based on TTE's pass -by data and rate tables. B. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of site -generated traffic from and to the adjacent street system was based on existing volume patterns and anticipated travel patterns for patrons of the development. Figure 7, Trip Assignment depicts the distribution of the estimated site -generated traffic entering and exiting the study area roadway network. C. Build Traffic Volumes When combined, the site -generated traffic volumes and No -Build scenario traffic volumes result in the Build scenario traffic volumes, shown on Figures 8 and 9 for the 2027 and 2045 analysis years, respectively. 3 Trip Generation Handbook, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 3d Edition Big River 445 Development Page 9 September 5', 2023 l� ¢ M M L 106 (122) +--36 (51) - - 1 L* r 0 (0) Chelsea (43) 38 J 4) I ►• (75) 63 —► O O O `a (0) 0 _ N LL t 25 (34) T N 4--20(30) 4) 1 4 r 31 (43) Chelsea Rd (0) 0 J + (30) 26 —+ r n to) 0 r a a M � ry L 21 (24) 4' 4 ♦-49 (701,e, a (37) 32 J (70) 60 —+ LEGEND ♦) 1 r► Traffic Movement xxx {xxx) Peak Hr Volumes: AM (PM) aTraffic Signal Control 0 Roundabout Control Side -Street Stop Control c ti M r N t—162 (172) +J Lr +-192 (220)_ (37) 32 J (286) 219 —+ Sri r 0 o t 86 (98) r r 4j 4 +--133 (159) Chelsea Rd (15) 12 1 (191) 149 —+ t 26 (30)j. 0 (0) N _0 (0) 4) 1 L* - 96 (1I I-94 W . 6 Ramps (0) 0 j I r* (0) 0 —♦ � N (0) 0 --- v M r r V M LL t 0 (0) T IyM +-96 (110) 4 T � r 0 �01-. E6 Ramps (177) 138 1 4) 1 r" N M � (110) 84 —+ (107) 79 --+ o 'J V 1 L w v N � O H 0 (0) 4 1 L+ r 0 {°)o� �ad (0) 01 +) t f (0) 0 O f0 O a (0) 0 Z V t Figure 7 - Trip Assignment Big River 445 Development Page 10 September 5", 2023 M M L 106 {1 22) 206(263) i L 10 (4)hChelsea (43) 38 J 4) I I (361) 177 -+ T (4) 10 V v E `a r T LL t49 (110) Lor 4--120(249) 4) 1 4 r 61 (73) Chelsea Rd (111) 48 -f I (218) 122 -+ m {46) 88 a Lo o v v 6 C V � 1 'N'-L 21 (24) 4' 4 221 (293) Chelsea Rd {37) 32 (359) 184 -+ 1 LEGEND ♦) 1 r► Traffic Movement xxx () Peak Hr Volumes: AM (PM) MTraffic Signal Control 0 Roundabout Control Side -Street Stop Control �a ti M r N t 152 (172) 4J 4 404(443) Chelsea Rd {37) 32 (599) 355 —+ 4 4 v _ N Sri r 0 o t 86 (98) r r 4j 4 +-345 (382) Chelsea Rd (15) 12 1 (504) 286 -+ i• M Ar vLL t 183 (362) N T I� IT 144 (242) 4) i r 7 (5) _-, - ji:: {141) 161 1 r r O Lo N {149) 94 —i' m r N (43) 49 -} a a v r o n o t 92 {262) r r ti H62 {15 )) 1-' 1 L4 r 179 (231) -94 W 6 Ramps (77) 29 J I r* (39) 14 -i Lo N r (146) 72 IS w o r rn ti T N MLL V v v +_54 (117) +-103 (115) " ,+J 4 r 34 {35) 1-94 E6 Ramps (302)177 � 4) 1 r* (172) 141 —# 3 r T (233) 120 N L 60 (45) Sri r M N r +-0 (0) + 1 4 r 23 (20) (20) 18 1 ♦Mead wOak Ave +1 I r+ (1) 0 -+ (12) 8 -- d7 Figure 8 - 2027 Build Traffic Volumes Big River 445 Development Page 11 September 5", 2023 rn §, M L106 {122) 3{305)i r 4 r 12 (5) Chelsea Rd (43) 38 4) I • k,, (417) 199 N {5)12� V V V LL L 54 (124) r r r 4--139(292) +% 1 4 r 67 (79? helsea Rd (133) 57 -f 4) I (254) 141 r (53) 93 -- a T 6 ti rn ry L 21 (24) {� 4 +- 254(336) Chelsea Rd {37) 32 (416) 208 - LEGEND ♦) 1 r► Traffic Movement xxx (xxx) Peak Hr Volumes: AM (PM) aTraffic Signal Control 0 Roundabout Control Side -Street Stop Control I qI �a ti M r N L 152 (172) 4) 4 +-439(486) Chelsea Rd {37) 32 (659) 378 -+ N ,e V _--. 0 o t 86 (98) 4j 4 381 {424) Chelsea Rd (15) 12 1 (564) 308 -+ A~ L 214 (427) N T o n00i + 158 {287) r r r i I r 9 (6) School 61W (166)1888 I r+ {176) 105 -+ (49) 60 -- a v T T � a c') IM LO V v vLL t 65 {139) M N +-105 {116) {,-38(41) T-94 E6 Ramps (325) 181 4 T I (184) 152 -► r ry (257) 128 � � a 0 a+ L 60 7(63) r c0 a M r H 0 (0) 4)1 4 r 27 {24) Meadow Dak (24) 21 1 + I r* (1) 0-1 N (15) 10 r v Figure g - 2045 Build Traffic Volumes Big River 445 Development Page 12 September 5", 2023 V. Operational Analysis A. Intersection Operational Description The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as roadways, traffic signals, roundabouts and stop -controlled intersections, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical capacity of a facility to the actual traffic volume on that facility. Various factors affect capacity including travel speed, roadway geometry, grade, number of travel lanes, and intersection control. The current standards for evaluating capacity and operating conditions are contained in Highway Capacity Manual'. The procedures describe operating conditions in terms of driver delay represented as a Level of Service (LOS). Operations are given letter designations with "A" representing the best operating conditions and "F" representing the worst. Generally, Level of Service "D" represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour. The following chart summarizes the level of service and delay criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Delav (sec) Level of Service Description Signalized Unsignalixed/ Roundabout 7A ------------------ Primarilyfree-flow operation. 0-10 0-10 B---- -- -- ------,- - - -- Reasonably unimpeded operation. Lt >10-20 >10-15 C.; P Stable operation The ability to maneuver is p y C---------- ------ 4:3u 19:11 : more restricted than LOS S. >20-35 >15-25 tip ILN ;:Jr:�F Less stable operation. Small increases inflow D ----- ------ -A - -- may cause large increases in delay and reduced >35-55 >25-35 f speeds. :.CC : C� : LY AN Unstable operation. Low speeds and _ _ L!:�: - considerable delay. a55-80 a35-50 7 ] :� rims A:r1Congested operation. High delay and extensive _ _ _ Ld [ �QU L� queuing. >80 >50 For side street stop -controlled intersections special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the minor approaches. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side street stop -control can be described two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approaches, since the mainline does not have to stop. It is common for intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience increased levels of delay and poor level of service on the side streets. For example, the acceptable threshold for a high-priority/high-volume mainline movement might be "C," while LOS "F" on a low-priority/low-volume side -street movement might be appropriate. I Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Transportation Research Board, 6tn Edition Big River 445 Development Page 13 September 5', 2023 A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular queuing, or the line of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can operate with an acceptable Level of Service, but if queues from the intersection extend back to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to adjacent land uses, unsafe operating conditions could result. In this report, the industry design standard 95th percentile queue length is used. The 95" percentile queue length refers to the length of vehicle queue that has only a five -percent probability of occurring during an analysis hour. This study has utilized the current industry Synchro/SimTraffic software package (1 I' Edition) to analyze the 2027 and 2045 No -Build and Build conditions for both the AM and PM peak hours. It is noted, the reported results are from the aggregate of 10 SimTraffic simulations which use a random number generator to seed the network with vehicles. These results reflect dynamic conditions and are more accurate than the results of the static analysis reported by Synchro. Due to the random number generator results can sometimes show slightly better operations on minor movements when the intersections are operating well and have increased traffic volumes. This can be seen when delays and queues noted for minor movements in the Build Scenario are slightly less than the No -Build Scenario. B. Results of Analysis - 2027 Conditions This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses and provides recommendations, as necessary to mitigate the impacts. Table 4 summarize the results of the operational analyses for the 2027 No Build and Build scenarios. Proposed access intersections are shaded gray. Table 4.2027 Operations Measure of Effectiveness (Delay in Sec and Queue in Ft) Intersection Criteria2027 No -Build 2027 Build s AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour I AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour Fenning Ave & 1-94 WB I Overall LOS & Delay A 10.0 B 13.8 B 10.9 B 15.3 Ramps/7th St lWorst Movement LOS & Delay C 30.4 (WBL) C 31.7 (NBL) C 31.1 (NBL) C 29.1 (WBL) (Signal) 95th Percentile Queue SBT - 90' WBT -117' WBL - 109' WBL - 134' Fenning Ave & 1-94 EB I Overall LOS & Delay B 12.3 B 12.9 B 16.1 B 17.5 Ramps/Chelsea Rd lWorst Movement LOS& Delay C 32.1 (EBT) C 33.6 (NBL) C 30.9 (WBT) D 35.7 (NBL) (Signal) I 95th Percentile Queue SBL - 97' EBL - 115' EBL -137' EBL - 203' Fenning Ave & Meadow Oak Ave Overall LOS & Delay A 4.8 A 5.6 A 5.1 A 6.0 Worst Movement LOS & Delay A 5.4 (SBT) A 6.4 (SBT) A 5.9 (SBT) A 7 (SBT) (Roundabout) I 95th Percentile Queue WBLTR - 37' NBLT - 46' WBLTR - 38' NBLT - 48' Fenning Ave & School Blvd Overall LOS & Delay A 4.8 A 6.7 A 5.0 A 7.0 lWorst Movement LOS& Delay A 7.3 (WBT) B 10.3 (WBT) A 7.7 (WBT) B 10.2 (WBT) (Roundabout) 95th Percentile Queue NBLTR - 61' WBLTR - 114' EBLTR - 62' SBLT -121' Fallon Ave &Chelsea Rd Overall LOS & Delay A 4.3 A 6.0 A 4.6 A 7.0 lWorst Movement LOS& Delay A 6.5 (EBT) A 8.2 (WBT) A 6.9 (EBT) A 9.6 (WBT) (Roundabout) 95th Percentile Queue SBLTR - 58' SBLTR - 80' SBLTR - 63' WBLTR - 102' Chelsea Rd & Access 1 Overall LOS & Delay A 3.1 A 4.8 (Side Street Stop Controlled) Worst Movement LOS & Delay B 14.3 (SBL) D 35 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue SBL - 74' SBL - 121' Chelsea Rd &Access 2 Overall LOS & Delay A 2.4 A 3.5 (Side Street Stop Controlled) Worst Movement LOS & Delay B 10.3 (SBL) C 19.4 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue SBL - 80' 1SBL - 111' NA Chelsea Rd & Access 3 Overall LOS & Delay A 2.6 A 3.6 (Side Street Stop Controlled) Worst Movement LOS & Delay A 8.6 (SBL) B 14.9 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue SBL - 68' SBL - 97' Chelsea Rd &Access 4 Overall LOS & Delay A 1.3 A 1.7 (Side Street Stop Controlled) Worst Movement LOS & Delay A 6.6 (SBL) A 9 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue SBL - 49' SBL - 53' Level of Service reported from an average delay from 10 SimTraffic simulations for overall intersection and worst movement. 951h percentile queues are a result from an average of 10 SimTraffic simulations and the longest queue per intersection is reported Big River 445 Development Page 14 September 5t1i, 2023 The results shown in Table 4 indicate the following for 2027 No -Build and Build conditions: • 2027 No -Build - Delay, LOS and queueing are all acceptable on an overall intersection and individual movement basis without the proposed project. Roadway and intersection improvements are not needed to accommodate the growth in background traffic. • 2027 Build - Delay, LOS and queueing are all acceptable on an overall intersection and individual movement basis with the proposed project. No operational issues are expected at the proposed access points. Roadway and intersection mitigation measures are not needed to accommodate site -generated traffic. It is recommended that MnDOT update the signal timings for the I-94 ramp intersections with Fenning Ave (CSAH 18) due to increased traffic from the Proposed Project. C. Results of Analysis - 2045 Conditions The long-range planning horizon year is 2045 and a 1% annual growth rate was assumed, as mentioned in the No -Build section. The results of the analysis of the 2045 No -Build and Build traffic conditions are summarized in Table 5. Proposed access intersections are shaded gray. It is noted that traffic signal timings were optimized using Synchro for the 2045 conditions. Table 5. 2045 Ouerations Measure of Effectiveness (Delay in Sec and Queue in Ft) Intersection 2045 No -Build 2045 Build Jff Criteria AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Fenning Ave & 1-94 WB Overall LOS & Delay B 10.8 B 15.1 B 11.9 B 16.7 Ramps/7th St IWorstMovement LOS& Delay C 32.7 (NBL) C 32.1 (NBL) C 29.4 (WBL) C 29.3 (WBL) (Signal) I 95th Percentile Queue SBT -106' SBT -134' WBL -124' WBT -144' Fenning Ave & 1-94 EB Overall LOS & Delay B 13.0 B 14.1 B 16.7 B 19.2 Ramps/Chelsea Rd IWorstMovement LOS& Delay D 38.6 (NBL) D 38.6 (WBT) C 32.2 (WBT) D 36.8 (NBL) (Signal) I 95th Percentile Queue SBL- 100' EBL - 135' NBL - 154' EBL - 224' Penning Ave &Meadow Oak Ave Overall LOS & Delay A 5.0 A 5.9 A 5.2 A 6.5 IWorstMovement LOS& Delay A 5.6 (SBT) A 6.8 (SBT) A 6 (SBT) A 7.6 (SBT) (Roundabout) 95th Percentile Queue WBLTR - 45' NBLT - 50' WBLTR - 46' NUT - 56' Penning Ave &School Blvd Overall LOS & Delay A 5.2 A 7.8 A 5.5 A 10.1 IWorstMovement LOS& Delay A 8.1 (WBT) B 11.8 (WBT) A 8.3 (WBT) C 15.3 (WBT) (Roundabout) 95th Percentile Queue WBLTR - 69' WBLTR - 150' EBLTR - 68' WBLTR - 248' Fallon Ave &Chelsea Rd Overall LOS & Delay A 4.7 A 7.3 A 5.1 A 8.5 IWorstMovement LOS& Delay A 7.1 (EBT) A 9.9 (WBT) A 7.4 (EBT) B 11.9 (WBT) (Roundabout) 95th Percentile Queue SBLTR - 61' SBLTR - 107' SBLTR - 76' WBLTR - 139' Chelsea Rd & Access 1 Overall LOS & Delay A 3.3 A 7.0 (Worst Movement LOS & Delay C 15.8 (SBL) F 60.7 (SBL) (Side Street Stop Controlled) I 95th Percentile Queue SBL- 76' SBL - 175' Chelsea Rd & Access 2 Overall LOS & Delay A 2.5 A 4.9 Worst Movement LOS & Delay B 11.7 (SBL) D 26.8 (SBL) (Side -Street Stop -Controlled) 95th Percentile Queue SBL- 78' SBL - 138' NA Chelsea Rd &Access 3 Overall LOS & Delay A 2.7 A 3.9 Worst Movement LOS & Delay A 9.8 (SBL) C 17.4 (SBL) (Side -Street Stop -Controlled) 95th Percentile Queue SBL - 73' SBL - 96' Chelsea Rd & Access 4 Overall LOS & Delay A 1.4 A 1.7 Worst Movement LOS & Delay A 6.8 (SBL) B 10.2 (SBL) (Side -Street Stop -Controlled) 95th Percentile Queue SBL - 51' SBL - 55' Level of Service reported from an average delay from 10 SimTraffic simulations for overall intersection and worst movement. 95"' percentile queues are a result from an average of 10 SimTraffic simulations and the longest queue per intersection is reported. Big River 445 Development Page 15 September 5t1i, 2023 The results shown in Table 5 indicate the following for 2045 No -Build and Build conditions: • 2045 No -Build — All intersections experience adequate delay, LOS and queueing on an overall intersection and individual movement basis without the proposed project. Roadway and intersection improvements are not needed to accommodate the growth in background traffic. It is recommended that MnDOT update the signal timings for the 1-94 ramp intersections with Fenning Ave (CSAH 18) due to increased background traffic. • 2045 Build — All intersections experience adequate delay, LOS and queueing on an overall intersection and individual movement basis with full build out of the proposed project. It is noted that southbound left turn movement at Access 1 experiences longer delay as vehicles wait for appropriate gaps to enter Chelsea Rd. Review of the 951}i percentile queue indicates no queue issues as the length is accommodated by the proposed geometry. These types of side -street operations are not uncommon on high volumes roadways. Additionally, there are three other egress points for vehicles to use to exit the site. D. Assessment of Additional Development — West Side of the Site There are development possibilities for other parcels north of Chelsea Rd and west of the Proposed Project. High level analysis indicates increased development, in addition to the Proposed Project, could result the need for additional capacity at the Fenning Ave (CSAH 18)/Chelsea Rd signalized intersection. In particular dual eastbound to northbound left turn lanes could be needed which would require geometric and equipment revisions at the traffic signal. Additionally, the capacity of Chelsea Rd might need to increase from a three -lane section to a four -lane section as it nears Fenning Ave (CSAH 18). It is recommended that traffic assessments are conducted as development of other parcels are considered. Big River 445 Development Page 16 September 5', 2023 VI. Summary and Recommendations The preceding analysis has evaluated the potential traffic impacts of the approximately 20-acre Big River 445 Development on the operations of the study area intersections in the City Monticello, Wright County, MN. Two design years were considered in this study, 2027 to provide a thorough assessment of full build traffic and 2045 to remain consistent with the long-range planning horizon. For both design years, No - Build and Build scenarios were analyzed and compared to assess the development's impact, and the area's future infrastructure needs. Full development of site is expected to result in approximately 12,679 vehicle trips using the proposed site access locations per average weekday. Peak hour trips generated by the full development are estimated at 901 trips (479 entering and 422 exiting) during the AM peak hour and 1,097 trips (548 entering and 549 exiting) during the PM peak hour. These are trips after internal shared trip reductions, but not pass -by reductions and reflect traffic using the site accesses. Access to the site proposed via four access driveways on Chelsea Rd W. Growth in background traffic at a rate of 1.0 percent per year is accounted for in the analysis, as well as school traffic from nearby schools. The following bullet points summarize roadway recommendations: • Year 2027 Conditions — Background (No -Build) and site generated traffic (Build) are adequately accommodated by the surrounding intersections and proposed accesses and geometric improvement measures are not needed. It is recommended that MnDOT update the signal timings for the I-94 ramp intersections with Fenning Ave (CSAH 18) due to increased traffic from the Proposed Project. • Year 2045 Conditions — Background (No -Build) and site generated traffic (Build) are adequately accommodated by the surrounding intersections and proposed access locations and geometric improvement measures are not needed. It is recommended that MnDOT update the signal timings for the I-94 ramp intersections with Fenning Ave (CSAH 18) due to increased background traffic and traffic from the Proposed Project. • Additional Development Considerations — There are development possibilities for other parcels north of Chelsea Rd and west of the Proposed Project. High level analysis indicates increased development, in addition to the full Proposed Project, could result the need for additional capacity at the Fenning Ave (CSAH 18)/Chelsea Rd signalized intersection. In particular dual eastbound to northbound left turn lanes could be needed which would require geometric and equipment revisions at the signal. Additionally, the capacity of Chelsea Rd might need to increase from a three -lane section to a four -lane section as it nears Fenning Ave (CSAH 18). It is recommended that traffic assessments are conducted as development of other parcels are considered. Big River 445 Development Page 17 September 5', 2023 75 0 U U Z W m U) U) J 0 a a W Z Z 2 0 0 CO W F- I) U) T W D Z W a a z W x 0 wsb January 29, 2024 Matt Leonard City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Big River 445 Commercial — Preliminary Plat & Engineering Plan Review City Project No. 2023-26 WSB Project No. 023288-000 Dear Mr. Leonard: We have reviewed the Big River 445 Commercial Preliminary Plat PUD site plans dated January 8, 2024. The applicant proposes to construct an eight (8) lot commercial development on a 9.9 acre parcel located on Chelsea Road adjacent to Fenning Avenue and 1-94. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Monticello's general engineering and stormwater treatment standards. Note, additional redline comments have been added to the submitted plans. All redline comments are not reflected in the memo below. We offer the following comments regarding these matters. General & Preliminary Plat 1. City staff may provide comments pertaining to the proposed landscaping, sidewalk/trail extensions, tree preservation plan, or other elements under separate cover. 2. The building department and/or Fire Marshall will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements. 3. Any work within MnDOT and/or Wright County right of way will require a permit, add a note to the plan to this affect. Provide copies of completed permits prior to the start of construction. 4. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments on the plans have been summarized in this review letter. Existing Conditions/Removal Plans (C1.11 5. Coordinate the removal or abandonment of any unused utility services as required by the City Public Works department. 6. Show impacts related to abandoning/removing existing service stubs along the adjacent public roadways. K:\023288-000\Admin\Docs\2024-01-11 Submitttal (Preliminary Plat)\_2024-01-29 Monticello Commercial PUD & Prelimianry Plat - WSB Engineering Comments - Final.docx Big River 445 Commercial - Preliminary Plat PUD — WSB Engineering Plan Review January 29, 2024 Page 2 Site Plans (C2.1. C2.2. C2.3) 7. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures to accommodate the City's ladder truck and/or as required by the City Fire Marshall. The Fire Marshall will review and provide comments under separate cover. 8. Verify whether the pedestrian ramp and cross walk at the southeast end of the parking lot are needed. a. There is no receiving pedestrian ramp, sidewalk, nor trail on the other side. b. Consider stopping sidewalk at the corner of the parking area as it is done on the southwest side. 9. Provide dimensions for HC/isle locations. 10. The plan shows 18' long parking stalls along the sidewalk, increase these to 20'. 11. Provide additional temporary barricades at the north ends of the entrance roads for incoming traffic. 12. It appears information is missing from the legend, review and update. Utilitv Plans (C3.1. C3.2. C3.3) 13. Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will be required to apply for a permit from DLI, provide copies to the City. 14. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet. Where watermain crosses any storm sewer or sanitary sewer, add a note at each location to the effect of "Maintain 18-inch Separation, 4" Rigid Insulation". If offsets are required where conflicts with normal watermain pipe placement occur, add appropriate details to the plans. 15. The Fire Marshall will review hydrant coverage and provide comments under a separate cover. a. Additional hydrants appear to be needed. If these are not intended to be constructed with the initial project, still show the approximate location. b. If hydrants will be added with future lots/buildings, then the stubs to the lots should be 8" up to the location of the hydrant lead. 16. Consider installing an additional 24" gate valve on the watermain along Chelsea Rd between the looped service connections as part of the project to minimize future disruption to the site during maintenance or watermain breaks. 17. Add note whether the existing water stub will be utilized by Lot 5. 18. 8" gate valve splits the site into east and west zones impacted by future shutoffs. Consider an additional gate valve on the north side of the loop and possible rearrangement to control and limit the impact of future shutdowns. 19. Provide castings for curb stops and cleanouts in impervious surfaces. 20. Note to insulate the water pipes when they are within 36" of the storm sewer. 21. Match the pipe slope and pipe material of the existing sanitary sewer stub for the remainder of the pipe segment to the first proposed manhole. Big River 445 Commercial - Preliminary Plat PUD — WSB Engineering Plan Review January 29, 2024 Page 3 22. Provide 6" PVC SDR 26 for commercial sanitary sewer services. 23. Provide turning movements for Vactruck access to public sanitary manholes. 24. Verify the use of PVC SDR 35 for storm sewer (typically HDPE or PVC Schedule 40). 25. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of: a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5'. e. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details. f. The City will require televising for sanitary and storm sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the City for review. Gradinq Plans (C4.1. C4.2, C4.3) 26. The Cit's typical minimum bituminous grade is 2.0% but will allow grades to be set as flat as 1.5 % in select locations. The minimum concrete curb grade is 0.5%. Please review grading and address any deficient locations. 27. Label EOFs for all low points in paved and green spaces. We will review the freeboard separation of the EOFs with the FFEs of proposed buildings 28. There is a short circuiting issue with the inlet and outlet locations in Infiltration Basin 20P 29. Screen (grey out) utilities so that the grading plan is more easily interpreted. Erosion & Sediment Control Plans (C5.1, C5.2, C5.3) 30. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future plan submittals. Complete. 31. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 32. A full review of erosion/sediment control and SWPPP will be conducted with the final plat submittal. a. Add inlet protection on Fenning Avenue in the north bound lane leaving the site to catch any sediment tracking. Big River 445 Commercial - Preliminary Plat PUD — WSB Engineering Plan Review January 29, 2024 Page 4 b. Add additional perimeter control/silt fence along the Fennig Avenue side of the site. Construction Details/Plans (C6.1 — C6.6) 33. The pavement design/typical section shall be designed to meet the City's standard, at minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site and may need to include a thicker aggregate section and/or a sand section. 34. The pavement section for the primary fire truck access route shall meet a 9-ton design. 35. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal. Stormwater Management 36. The first line of the stormwater report refers to the site as being in Inver Grove Heights, please correct and verify that the correct site and location is being used elsewhere in the report. 37. Stormwater report references Chosen Valley completing boring and soils reporting. Soils report is from Haugo and states they completed the borings and geotechnical report. Please confirm and clean up. 38. Below are General Stormwater Requirements for the Site: a. The applicant will be required to submit a stormwater management plan for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements in the City's Design Manual. b. The new site will need to provide onsite volume control for runoff of 1.1" over the new impervious area, Pre-treatment measures are required prior to discharging to the volume control BMPs. i. Documented site -specific infiltration or hydraulic conductivity measurements (double -ring infiltrometer) completed by a licensed soil scientist or engineer is required for infiltration rates. c. The City has an existing regional stormwater ponding system with stubs connected to the site. Confirm proposed hardcover will not exceed the intended hardcover limit and will meet existing discharge rates to all current drainage points for the 2, 10, and 100-yr storm events i. Rate Control for the portion of the site draining to the regional storm sewer is being met via regional ponding. d. Provide erosion control on all down perimeter areas. e. An operation and maintenance plan for all stormwater BMPs is required and should be submitted with the stormwater report for review. 39. Please provide the storm sewer sizing calculations for verification in future submittals. a. Include a storm sewer stub for lot 6. 40. Grades for lots 3-8 will be confirmed with submission of more detailed plans at time of development. 41. EOF's should be shown as stabilized outlets. Please provide riprap and more detailed grading of these areas to ensure a drainage route. b. EOFs shall be sized with a minimum bottom width of five feet and 4:1 side slopes. Big River 445 Commercial - Preliminary Plat PUD — WSB Engineering Plan Review January 29, 2024 Page 5 c. The maximum flow depth in EOFs shall be less than equal to one foot as calculated for a 100-year back-to-back storm event. 42. Show a maintenance access route to the proposed basins and inlet and outlet pipes for future maintenance activities. 43. Vegetation of infiltration/filtration practices shall be as shown in the City of Monticello Standard Details. A plan for management for vegetation shall be included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. 44. Subgrade soils for infiltration/filtration practices shall be as presented in the City of Monticello Standard Details. Assume a 30 percent void ratio for the purposes of volume calculations. 45. Provide a minimum of two feet of vertical separation from a stormwater BMP's HWL to the FFE of any buildings. In areas where this separation is not or cannot be provided, additional analysis is required showing that the 100-year back-to-back storm event does not affect adjacent homes. Traffic & Access 46. The site would likely generate more than 7,000 daily trips, 860 AM peak hour trips and 668 PM peak hour trips. The existing Average Daily Traffic on Chelsea Road is 3,162 and on CSAH 18 is 11,698. The addition of the proposed traffic would likely have an impact on roadway capacity and operations at the intersection. Provide an analysis of the expected intersection operations at CSAH 18 and Chelsea Road. Traffic study accounts for additional lots being developed to the west. We would recommend showing two buildout phases if only the 8 lots shown in the plan are being proposed with this submittal. Verify most recent site plan is being used. Provide appendices to traffic study for review. 47. Restriping to extend the two-way left -turn lane on Chelsea Road will be necessary if left - turns will be allowed at all accesses. Revise striping shown on Site Plan. Show restriping on Chelsea Road to extend the two-way left -turn lane up to existing median (as described in traffic study). Opposing travel directions at access points should be separated by a 4" double yellow line. 48. Show turning movement templates at access locations. Left -turn out of the east access may not work with existing median on Chelsea Road. Show turning movement templates with proposed design vehicle at access locations. 49. The applicant is proposing three driveway access points, with spacing less than 300 feet. Street access spacing, grades, and sight lines will be reviewed with future submittals. The applicant is proposing two driveway access points. Show spacing of west access point to the existing access on the south side of Chelsea Road. Also provide intersection sight distance exhibit with future submittals. 50. Provide illumination levels at property lines on Site Photometric sheet and follow 153.063 Exterior Lighting in Monticello Code of Ordinances. Verify light locations are not placed in roadway/sidewalk. Provide additional photometrics and light locations for lots 3-8. 51. The Traffic Study states that future development on Chelsea Road could require additional lanes on Chelsea near the Fenning intersection. Provide conceptual lane Big River 445 Commercial - Preliminary Plat PUD — WSB Engineering Plan Review January 29, 2024 Page 6 configurations to verify proposed ROW is adequate for additional future lanes as discussed in the study. Wetlands & Environmental 52. A Level 1 (desktop) wetland delineation is required. If the Level 1 indicates the potential for wetlands on site, a Level 2 (field) delineation will be required. This information should be submitted to the Wetland Conservation Act contact for the City of Monticello. Complete. There are no wetlands on the site (NOD 21114-000). Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Feel free to contact me at 612-419-1549 if you have any questions or comments regarding the engineering review. Sincerely, WSB James L. Stremel, P.E. Senior Project Manager Jr,T Y o� � z = m 07 January 23, 2024 ' O 602, dy Matt Leonard 71350 Monticello City Engineer 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Wright County Monticello MN 55362 Highway Department 3600 Braddock Ave NE Buffalo, MN 55313 RE: Preliminary Plat Review for Big River 445, CSAH 18 Plat No. 24.04 Phone: (763)682-7383 Email: Dear Mr. Leonard, HwyAdmin@co.wright.mn.us We have received the Application for preliminary Plat review for Big River 445 located along County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 18. Wright County may have additional comments prior to signing the plat and as the project progresses to the permitting and VIRGIL HAWKINS, P.E. Highway Engineer construction phase. CHAD HAUSMANN, P.E. 1) The proposed right of way is aggregable to county staff. Highway Engineer SARA BUERMANN, P.E. 2) It is out understanding that no new access is proposed as part of this plat. Assistant Hwy. Engineer CODY SEDBROOK, P.E. 3) A Right of Way permit is required for any work within the CSAH 18 right of way. Traffic Engineer NATE HELGESON 4) No increase to the peak runoff to the CSAH 18 right of way should result from this Maintenance development project. Superintendent BRIAN JANS 5) The final plat will need a signature block for the County Highway Engineer. Shop Maintenance Superintendent Please contact us at 763-682-7383 if you have any questions or need further clarification. JEREMY CARLSON, P.L.S. Right -of -Way Agent PATSY WAYTASHEK Accounting Mgr. - Hwy VACANT Construction Engineer NICK CARLSON Design Engineer Sincerely, Cody Sedbrook Cody Sedbrook, PE Traffic Engineer Digitally signed by Cody Sedbrook Date: 2024.01.23 12:48:27 -06'00' Cc: Chad Hausmann, Highway Engineer Sara Buermann, Assistant Highway Engineer Adam Backes, Permit Tech Ryan Melhouse, City of Monticello Engineering Randy Rauwerdink, Venture Pass Partners CCSurveyor Mail List An Equal Opportunity Employer -www.co.wright.mn.us/189/Highway 1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION January 29, 2024 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello RE: C.S. 8680 RP 194.804 (1 94) Big River 445 Plat Monticello, Minnesota Dear Ms. Schumann: District 3 - Planning 7694 Industrial Park Road Baxter, MN 56425 218/828-5700 or 1-800-657-3971 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the above -referenced site plan in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 505.03, Plats and Surveys. MnDOT would like to offer the following comments/recommendations: 1. A review of the Big River 445 Plat was completed by MnDOT District 3 staff. 2. MnDOT District 3 permits staff have reviewed the plat and stormwater drainage report for the property and have no findings requiring permits or further review. 3. There shall be no other encroachments onto, or work done in the 194 right of way without a permit and no net increase in storm water runoff to 194 right of way from the property. Contact Keith Peterson, District 3B Permits, keith.peterson@state.mn.us right of way work questions and permit information. If you have any further questions or comments, please call me at 320/223-6526. Sincerely, Digitally signed by Thomas Thomas Cruikshank Cruikshank Date: 2024.01.29 12:00:50-06'00' Tom Cruikshank Principal Planner ecc: MnDOT District 3 Development Review Committee An equal opportunity employer 4 EXHIBIT 3.3 0 City of Monticello Boundary Mixed Neighborhood (MN) Monticello Orderly Annexation Area (MOAA) Mixed -Density Residential (MDR) 0 Parcels Manufactured Home (MH) Streets Downtown Mixed -Use (DMU) y++* Railroad Community Commercial (CC) —a Water Bodies Regional Commercial (RC) Development Reserve (DR) Commercial and Residential Flex (CRF) Open Space and Resource Conservation (OSRC) Employment Campus (EC) City Parks and Recreation (PR) 0 Light Industrial Park (LIP) Estate Residential (ER) General Industrial (GI) (� Low -Density Residential (LDR) 0 Public and Institutional (P) Traditional Residential JR) 0 Xcel Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) PON■ I•r ,North "A V V . .......... a _ t R � m � o� r r�l \ 1 PI I -I I -IT � MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 55 Commercial and Downtown Community Regional Residential Mixed -Use Commercial Commercial Flex A_ Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial �bZBZ�Z Cornerstone Cub Cafe and Target NA Foods Catering Co. Xcel Monticello Light Nuclear Employment Industrial General Public and Generating Campus Park Industrial Institutional Plant 7 7w now 1 sum r Employment Industrial Industrial Public Uses Nuclear Power 02 UMC Suburban Cargill Kitchen Manufacturing Solutions Monticello Great River Xcel Regional Energy Library MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 65 REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) The Regional Commercial designation includes large-scale commercial uses serving a regional market, typically on large sites along the Interstate or major arterials roadways such as State Highway 25. Retail uses within this category usually have large floor areas and high sales volumes and may be considered shopping "destinations" by consumers from the region. Uses such as furniture and electronic stores, farm supply, home improvement stores, department stores, "big box" retailers, hotels and restaurants are included. Smaller and more local -serving retail uses, and personal services are generally not appropriate but could be allowed if complementary to a regional use. Commercial • "Big Box" Stores • Department Stores • Hotels • Restaurants Recreational • Plaza • Public Space Primary Mode Vehicular with access to collectors and arterials Transit or shuttle service Secondary Mode Shared bike/ pedestrian facilities • Floor Area Ratio ♦ 2018 Correlating (FAR) Zoning District 0.30 to 0.50 B-3 • Height - Highway 1-2 stories, 4 stories Business District for hotels or office B-4 • Lot Area - Regional N/A Business District 78 LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION i i .Famol Irimfo ►'f 4 - ass( �Mug/ ui°n`► :MINIM �meI �— � City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-16 calling for a public hearing on March 25, 2024, for vacation of drainage and utility easements as legally described for a portion of Country Club Manor Second and Third Addition Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Community Development Director 2/26/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Public Works Director/City Engineer, City Administrator Assistant City Engineer ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-16 calling for a public hearing on March 25, 2024, for vacation of drainage and utility easements as legally described for a portion of Country Club Manor Second and Third Addition. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to call for a public hearing for the vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements within the plats of Country Club Second and Third Addition for purposes of replatting of the multi -family project area. The petitioners are proposing a replat of Lot 1, Block 5 of Country Club Manor Second Addition to accommodate a change from a single multi -family building to eleven twinhome buildings, 22 units. The land use considerations are anticipated for Council approval in March in conjunction with the vacation hearing. CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC and Monticello MF West LLC are the fee title owners of the parcels in which the current vacations are proposed, and they submitted a petition for the vacation of the noted easements. Drainage and utility easements will be required to re-established per the direction of the City Engineer's office within the proposed replat of Country Club Manor Fourth Addition. The City Engineer's office and Community Development Department will review the replat to verify all required public easements for drainage and utility purposes are in place and lots continue to meet subdivision and PUD approval requirements. Procedurally, Council must call for a public hearing to consider the vacation. Statute requires fourteen days between the publication of notices and the public hearing itself. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 City staff prepared and sent notices to be published in the Monticello Times and notices will be sent to affected property owners. I. Budget Impact: The petitioner or their representative have provided the required vacation petition fee and escrow for consideration. II. Staff Workload Impact: Workload impact is expected at approximately 10-20 hours for review and recommendation on the vacation requests and platting. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The proposed plat and PUD will be evaluated for consistency with the 2040 Plan with the pending land use decisions. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend adopting the resolution and calling for the public hearing. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2024-16 B. Aerial Image C. Vacation Petition D. Easement Vacation Description E. Current Plat, Country Club Manor Second Addition and Country Club Manor Third Addition CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND AND THIRD ADDITION WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 4152.851, after two (2) weeks published and posted notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before a hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the vacation of drainage and utility easements for Country Club Manor Second and Third Addition on Monday, March 25, 2024, at 6:30 PM at the Monticello City Hall: Legal Descriptions: Lot 5, Block 1, Country Club Manor Second Addition Outlot A, Country Club Manor Third Addition NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the vacation of such easements and a public hearing shall be held on such proposed vacation on the 25t" day of March, 2024 before the City Council in the Council Chambers located at the Monticello Community Center at 6:30 p.m. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give published, posted, and mailed notice of such hearing as required by law. ADOPTED BYthe City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 26t" day of February, 2024. CITY OF MONTICELLO Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Consideration of Vacation of Easements I ; City Boundary Parcels CITY OF Monticello 1 in=719Ft N A February 22, 2024 Map Powered By Datafi wsb February 20, 2024 TO: City Clerk City of Monticello To Whom it may Concern: Monticello MF West LLC and CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC, fee title property owners of property located off 7tn Street West to the North and County Rd 39 NE to the West, including Outlot A, petition on behalf of the Owner for the vacation of all of the drainage and utility easements contained and as created on Lot 1, Block 5 Country Club Manor Second Addition and Outlot A, Country Club Manor Third Addition. Legal description: Lot 1, Block 5 Country Club Manor Second Addition and Outlot A, Country Club Manor Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE Thank You, ei I �� Brian J.1-<1c lson Monticello F West LLC Property Owner's Signature Wesley Butler CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC Property Owner's Signature Thank You, Brian J. Nicholson Monticello MF West LLC Property Owner's Signature **4 Wesl er CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC Property Owner's Signature CITY of- CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development Vacation Petition 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 MOntkeflo (763) 295-271 l 1 Community.development(a,ci.monticello.mn.us _�...�.- PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address 10715 Tee Box Trail, Monticello & TBD Property Legal Description Outiot A, Country Club Manor 3rd Add. & Lot 1, Block 5, Country Club Manor 2nd Add. Pro arty ID Number 155276005010 & 15528000010 f PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION ! Owner Name Monticello MF West LLC / CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC Owner Address 6757 Karmen Ave NE, Albertville, MN 55301 / 161 St. Anthony Ave, St. Paul, MN 551031 Owner Phone/Email (612) 723-3330 / (651) 605-5222 / mhoagberg@headwatersdevelopment.com/wbutier@chc-mn.org VACATION TYPE: FEE: Street $200 + escrow x Drainage and/or Utility $200 + escrow Other (please specify): $200 + escrow ESCROW:, Commercial/Industrial/Institutional Residential See escrow 0-3 Acres $2,000 statement 1 unit $800 4-10 $6,000 below 2 + units $1000 based + $100/unit — up to $10,000 for initial escrow 11+ $8,000 TOTAL TO BE PAID AT PETITION $ 3,400.00 Property Owner/Petitioner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this request and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. I also acknowledge the Fees & Escrow Purpose explanation below and hereby agree to pay all statements received pertaining to additional petition expense and City review. Printed Name/Title: Brian Nicholson / Manager / Wesley Butler / Manager (Signature), .. J1_"' �.. Purpose of Fees & Escrow (Date) 2/20/2024 Fees: The fees are used for publication of the public hearing notice in the Monticello Times, for postage to mail the required notice to adjacent properties as outlined by ordinance or statute and recording fees. Escrow: The City uses escrow deposits for staff and consultant time for case review and preparation of documents related to the application or petition. This may include engineering, legal, planning, and environmental consultation. Should the original escrow be exceeded, the applicant or responsible party will be billed for all additional services. it is the policy of the City of Monticello to require petitioners for vacation approvals to reimburse the City for costs incurred in reviewing and acting upon applications, so that these costs are not borne by the taxpayers of the City. These costs include all the City's out-of-pocket costs for expenses, including the City's costs for review of the application by the City's staff, Consulting Engineer, Consulting Planner, City Attorney, or other consultants. The City will invoice the petitioner for these costs within 3 months of final action on the application and payment will be due within thirty (30) days. If payment is not received as required by this agreement, the City will proceed on action to assess or lien. Payment of costs will be required whether the application is granted or denied. Revised 2023 one 702.15OXIIIIIYAUXII Proposed Easement Vacation Description All of the drainage and utility easements contained and as shown/created on Lot 1, Block 5 Country Club Manor Second Addition and Outlot A, Country Club Manor Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. D-PFivaA F0,+ COU VTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION _ NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH LINE OF THE NW1/4 / SECTION 10, T.121, R.25 OF SECTION 10, T.121, R.25 _ NORTH QUARTER CORNER 1 / OF SECTION 10, T.121, R.25 �/ - N89°10'28"W - -� � _--- S89°10'28"E 476.35 l�J 2172.74 /� / /�I I I'� /Ir_-\A/ Tr_ - A /ter_- k Alt\ ITI/�r_-I I n \�L_VJ V IL_ VV I L_I \1 \f\�L_ IVI\JI 1 I I I I \�L_vL, I I u I I 1�)T I L 1 L O. I I A L,L_vvr � 1 A I ^ I1 N I Fl. I vv. I v\JL_I nL/ v 0 Z S88°59'40"E 400.00 — S88°59'40"E 195.14 w- - - - - - - - - - - - — N In 6^� jT v \ jib 0 12.00 FOOT DRAINAGE—c C)co AND UTILITY EASEMENT / Z v DETAIL"A"- /�/11 I^ ITS)\/ —t I I LIJ I — ' 4`C0J I \ 12.00 FOOT DRAINAGE---i I � AND UTILITY EASEMENT BLOCK 5 it ` :-r c 12.00 FOOT DRAINAGES-/ \ 1 `� '— LIJ AND UTILITY EASEMENT a 7co I r\ w I ^I I-T-1 ^T A i X\ ��' t / '' \ :� 6.00 FOOT DRAINAGE l \ AND UTILITY EASEMENT C► , \ Go� - I I 00 DRAINAGE & UTILITY A� EASEMENT ON GO ALL OF OUTLOT A •) ♦i\J \ I I I \ l%h ` v '�' ♦ ti OUTLOT I 3 / I h A A K I /, L) — — (� I�\ IVI r-\ L V�i 100, 1 019. q / \ �`� ♦ �s 5 6 �� , / i n I I \ IVAV °°b� LIJ ^ I( / 1 °�� 8 A�; LIJ �) �C� ♦ �� LIJ )'j" I 1 / ,`� , ♦ /� �,,� 10 ` ♦ — LIJ I IA �� I ( C;Ld F o v ',< J °Op 9// 9 / 7 , U, /\ / a-� ' 7 \� T / �0 14 , IIQ 16 s 10 17 1— _ E,L_U�.r\ 18 gum M 1 (r �� tS� ° 43" _ TI�-;�L'' ��/�/ \ ♦`tip�` � ` � i 1 `�, C � ^-- rT F IA/r-^ 3T \0 4 S8 1 V Y I19 30 13 21 20 S88°50'52"E 322.43 R=271.05Oa0 \ O I II \ \ II 14 I/ 0 W�-2/r 94.07 42°713 \ �a< / 15 \ \ 1 4, DETAIL "B" 16 ��/'Q� 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ♦ '9960 \ 'i9�c, 17 11 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK 2 18 CV , ` s, 20 \°Q 21 o o%Cn �� §'0 1 1 � � DELINEATED WETLAND "�j 2 cool B 5 6 7 8 9 10 � I \ � � p � LQ � OUTLOT C - DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF OUTLOT C VICINITY MAP / _� 1 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF LOT 11 BLOCK 3 , 1 _ - , 631.97 _ NOT TO SCALE / \ N88°50'52"W 1035.79 oo - ^r-/%-Ant\ 1 -1/, _ T -1 1 _ �sryT DETAIL "C" - SITES � )/1� I \11� I % I \ � TI I \\ tVYY I/ `t-.:�_ I/ 1 1 C.S.A.H. NO 19 ^ ^ L_ I F1 \ \ ��,\r< �• I � :< � n /� f1 r1 I T I� N I n n II �I yrrp AIRWAY DR. /--\ L !�� DETAIL Au J L-/ I I I \J I V DETAIL B DETAIL C FF CO NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE O� co M �O 7. do F s 21 �. �, o '�s, - O o 100 200 a ��, ti '� �� ems, 29�'yy °° >' 1 1 S88°59'40"E 195.14 ' �y "I;' '9 s 1 INCH = 100 FEET "• 0.57 ^ 194.57 � 0.64 18.21 rJ�` , ;< �t✓) ^%i-,, yAi, '�' '1'sr °\\�`,� N88°50'S2"W 1035.79 DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT •, , O �° ,�, O r BEARING ORIENTATION: 1 �\ ° � ' '7 ^ O° /' THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT d� >O, d° ��,v • = < \� \ QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 121 a ? RANGE 2 s' " '- NORTH, R5 WEST, IS ASSUMED TO BEAR 0 = DENOTES 1/2 INCH DIAMETER BY 18 SOUTH 89°10'28" EAST INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352 SECTION 10, T. 121, R. 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Monticello Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, fee owners of the following described property: Outlot A, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the Trail, Drive and Interstate and drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness, whereof, said Monticello Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of M' nesot ,fee owner, has cause these presents to be signed by its proper officers this 1Y day of 1/,t'y% 20,Z'. Signed: Monticello Economic Development Author (/IN\ President /� ��11 ��}{ E ecuti Director STATE OF /'�InAC417- COUNTY OF U=jr j j nl �]'� This in trument was acknowledged before me on this 1:._ day of I Y ogrwA6ef 20"'""by President and Ti v-L - AAr-ec Executive Director for the Monticello Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota. signature ! , c*-yudA StCAb^AA print o / Notary Public, l County, Minnesota My commission expires Jgklld*,N a` 7 I, Jonathan D. Schuette do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Jonathan D. Schuette, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 45352 STATE OF , MN hKA`;0W-- COUNTY OF �OV — ,fit The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me on this IL day of 1 0\[Lt skzr 20 by Jonathan D. Schuette, a Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 45352. -±Dz" signature fl b K-� �e print Notary Public, �a�la� County, Minnesota My commission expires acLn� '�I wsaL CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Reviewed by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello this day of 2 I C Chairperson Secreta CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Approved by the ity of Monticello, Minnesota this da f S' l 20�iZ. Mayor Ci Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR hereby certify that in accordance with Min ota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this I $*day of c-el"h1Wi , 20 2Z - A—,&- j • 90-4 Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY ENGINEER This V ie a and recommended for approval this day of MCsE. 4367, 201A . f,XWright County Engineer WRIGHT COUNTY LAND RECORDS �1 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20CK a on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also ursuant to es to St tutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this s�' day ofinn20_Af%- �+ right County L d Records Administrator WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the ounty Recorder for record on this day of LGi=f1�s'e' , 20� at N 11/ 3 o'clock . OM. and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. Sleeve ,.75 /3 as Document No. jftI �dyl I J2; Wright Cou Recorder DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING SHEET 1 OF 2 COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION A A / 1 6� / \ /1 1 I %ITS) A \ ~, /"A ) , \ 6.00 FOOT DRAINAGE ,JAND UTILITY EASEMENT t 00 BLOCK 5 CIS lkpo �ry ° C\a�y N N/ rnM:T M, oJ ^� - O ! \ // \/�\ LI _kI -) u p 0 aO V00 I \ fDRAINAGE & UTILITY orn 1L I EASEMENT ON 4 o a °O `' "�'�ALL OF OUTLOT A 2 AIlO :npO°,g0000, I I I `o d o9ly O 5p0y9 ^!`1� S0 09 -'so �` oo rya 3 � as 1ti• ° I ! I OUTLOT A tiA `p°s° °ygy� 4 00s06', �°° r- A I[)►A/ A \/ r,\ /r- 8 6'S ,50 \ O6 S y� pp \ / / \ I /� I \ V V /� IV o a0 a� e1A o F a' o� (,'4 / C-,L_v�.r </ 6' O \\� \ I sc ,y9y� 1`ti�p "0's° oo/�9c/'� ��, a0 y� ygy p �0 �G% \\ �� A7° SL I 0 0y9 �7° 1. I 1 p0 1 �O qs° °A ° GT 00, p0 �0 °O, II I I J d �% !/j� OOS �y,�`y S0 L I J �710 s° �y� 2 ..�� ° � o ��F %` 9sF� o° a�y9 9 po a° •°O �� \ / / �- �_� I 11� 00 qs °on y o ��/�w, �tij `�7 - °lY1 yp �V• O 9h \ V O ° 10 y p l \ L I J - 7° 6' s0 y� 6', !! \ O 9! 77° `r0 0°�9 �O a�y°g 3 �p0 l'ps °O O,n !o O° 5a 1 ,� pp '° 00 00 Oo y�� 00 Oc', "�Q !02 S S u'°s �a�y �!`�� s° O<� -� \ IVIlm V-/I \ -I <C ,o s° ��`',�y� 1 ° 'b �!o \ /� 7e! Too ° a�y� 11 pp o0 O� 9y Op �3 °p C•f O 1eV. sp ao 5a�y r��ry o o� Q chi °o y�� y4° !� \ 0 9 s° �y� ° \ tiA�, s° rya 12� ,° yt1o °46 Fp \2s III \ \ II / / / \ <�\13 61 ; ) 6�° �o-7o omoo Art, yso 4�doA'0 's0 14 oO, 6� 7° 0°° y �po°��7 °°p�s°° 2i ! �Ati00 �� / O 0 00, \ °°'s�A\\ A�° o 16�Ay9 04° °5a021 olybo00°��o�p6' Cb 10 °°s° O79 13�S,70 '? \ \ / / I ;r 21 lo,�� 18 ,` s° suoS �,,73 \ 0 y p o 'O0 0 i h�30 3 Q c0 A O p S? d 1b 67 6 a�4 -7T1 I ^TE:)r_r_T 1A \ /'/ ysr S0 y9y� 12 ��O $ 6'j S0 ti� & 120 -S0 C p43" Y V «S1 �° v 4 C a o \ V/ \ 00, 5p y9y� Epp a°s o00 00 °o ``� 19 cp c 334.S8 co /�!ytop-tpo 0 �� 0 9� ` �Q``S y� 20 ^ 30 S 6jwft S h ti '4 30 4r� ° 00 �ayy 13 � 0o O \ ��'SAO.O^�ry�y� / S7 ° 9 3j qq" L=137. • S88050'52"E 322.43 \ `'d 110 5 39'17"E 2s. Ts �y'` 'l`y� S'y \ 3e3 �y s S0 a Q ry 30.50 61.00 BLOCK 2 228.36 ^ ' 94.07 i '8 S° S, 7 ^ / S85°17'53" 14 y� 00 0 o ryN o0 3Q5p E s1.00 S88°50'52"E 61.00 S88°50'52"E 61.00 S88°50'S2"E 61.00 1 \ ` DETAIL „B„ _ / 0°°�9, °�y` pp �` o 7°d, \? �`�78 ti O� N ^ rn o 30.50 a Q a p p a a L� - SEE SHEET 1 /y 00 0y 1� F `' Ss 47 \ <� / +h 1 ^ o 0 0 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 \ ' \ ^ ^ N N N N ,/ ) 6', s0 y�� S° °8, \� A. Q 1 2 (V N O O O O O O O p O p cc °o �� 15 ,��,,. °so \ �``�,�o \ �U� /°" _a o w 3 3 4 W 5 6 " <``20° \8 2eN N N o ^ ao co co 0p 7 w w w \ - a0 �y .�ti 7s s v N o 0 0 0 8 0 0 9 010 0co tiA 16, o0S 6ir 726' 3p 50 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 °� o ry� ° �` \ L�2' 30.5 z o a o ° S7 , v ° Q� •�ti S s�0o <�?72 5 3g26 E 0 30.50 z voi ai z (n co z z Z !ys SO �� pp OSO 7q Rc\ R,52 61 0p L13 >;I U 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 LC c' 79d �00 0 17 1ti SS8° R` 5267� 267 4=20° S85°17'S3"E 61.00 L14 S88°5052"E 61.001 S88°50'S2�"E 61.00 a1 S88°50'52�"E 61.00 1 8 oo34S0 7604� s aSB26� a�4SO 3ry� 37'17" L=188.11 11 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK 2 s78, ti SO �� '`� ^ti' �O0 �% a�47° Caq 1 ? 208.25 7S, S7e o� .�i o 3.60 Q.S0 SO 43" 6� S C6 !� 6, o S �.�o A�'?y 3°S0 a`'� 19 ^ry. pp �.60�1 �a48656 �_35 = 3p 63 "�`�� 6.00 - > h 20 ^`y \1"1 IN - _ _ I - S88°50'52"E 220.47 `0 0 S NSB30S0 ^ hcO �`�0, �� O S °1 q 5?"E 610 d -2 j°0 " c' a'a' rno 76�A ,305 g"� ?P �20J IR 0 0 S ° 2 41 L=214.0 171.05 o \ . � 0 n,`� tv� k N 30 50 77 515g" 1 - r` 6�00 ^ �� h N o 30.5 E 61'00 Sgq° BLOCK 3 126.13 0 44.92 N86054'46"E 60.00 a \ ^ 0 0 25'07"E 61.00 CO N o0 30,S0 S88°50'S2"E 61.00 S88°50'S2"E 61.00 p• 1 ^ o0 0 30.50 30.50 00 p-----p 0 Q \ OUTLOT B `v ° 0 2� N o 0 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 sczo'CD V) = 7 h N 3 3. ^ c N O O O O O O O y O \ AO oV• 0 00. ° ' ^ N N N N N N p ' 3 50 09m o o N w ' 2g01°� �6 2 N7 30 5 o 'Mn M 6 W 00 e G 1 °14' 0 2 N p h o 7 0 8 0 0 9 001 0 00 a) bm rn \ `7.7 �Qd 61.00 30.50 coco o 0 0 0 0 o c u� 00 a �, L22 30.5 z o o s a m OUTLOT C \ N77° 0 cn z con con z 6, '20 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 515g-W 61.0p L21 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 c 8? 8.21 ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK 3 N84°2507"W 61.00 L20 t} 11 N88°50'SYu"W 61.00 L1F N88°50'S0 61.00 C U) DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF OUTLOT C / \ � 384.97 / � n 631s7 DETAIL "C" N88°50'52"W 1035.79 � -- \ SEE SHEET 1 PARCEL LINE DATA LINE NO. LENGTH BEARING L1 7.49 S41 ° 00' 09"E L2 10.17 S40' 58' 52"E L3 10.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E L4 10.17 S41' 00' 09"E L5 10.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E L6 10.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E L7 10.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E L8 10.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E L9 10.41 S35° 16' 01 "E 1-10 10.40 S49° 41' 27"E L11 44.24 S22° 36' 13"E L12 44.08 N72° 28' 16"E L13 22.54 S80° 37' 54"E L14 14.81 N87° 24' 26"E L15 10.17 S88° 50' 52"E L16 10.17 S88° 50' 52"E L17 24.48 N25° 15' 35"E L18 23.73 S5° 50' 55"W L19 10.17 N88° 50' 52"W L20 14.45 S89° 59' 09"W L21 16.45 N81 ° 01' 22"W L22 16.56 N74° 35' 07'W L23 25.22 N7° 07' 30"E L24 25.31 N43° 19' 01 "E L25 16.13 N55° 02' 56"W L26 16.42 N48° 16' 52'W L27 14.64 S39° 25' 30"E L28 10.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E L29 10.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E L30 10.17 S41 ° 00' 15"E L31 10.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E L32 10.17 S41 ° 00' 03"E L33 10.17 S41* 00' 15"E L34 24.79 N31 ° 34' 36"W PARCEL CURVE DATA CURVE NO. ARC LENGTH RADIUS DELTA C1 301.41 482.77 35*46'18" C2 30.02 482.77 3°33'46" C3 22.53 482.77 2°40'25" C4 30.03 400.67 4°17'38" C5 30.03 400.67 4°17'38" C6 20.53 60.00 19°36'32" 0 50' 100, H 1 INCH = 50 FEET O = DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT • = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 = DENOTES 1/2 INCH DIAMETER BY 18 INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352 BEARING ORIENTATION: THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 121 NORTH, RANGE 25 WEST, IS ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 89°10'28" EAST DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING SHEET 2 OF 2 0�-�� a aI 01 OL COUNTRY CLUB MANOR THIRD ADD T ON _ NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH LINE OF THE NW114 / SECTION 10, T.121, R.25. OF SECTION 10, T.121, R.25 S89°10'28"E OF QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 10, T.121, R.25 86.84 \ N89°10'28"W 2562.25 K A/'1N ITI/\r-I I r,\ \.L_U V IL_ yy I L_I \I IVI\JI v I IuL_L_L_\JI I -, I s I v I I \ I r�nl I�)T I I I I I I A I '�I /I�l� �I I I I I 0 L-\-f v r oe N Ar—^r \ T60 � so 60 I I I I I I I I I 80Lij I I I I --------------- I —_j-----�--- \ l v 1 1\ I r: " t�_' I ,� I I fi r) I �� A -I � ` i/ I ( � I ------ LI-I -------1------------- � in I 7 o I I " / I I I'� I iv \J L _ V L� I - LIJ 1 1 I— L.L4 \ ( /,/CIS r I 1 ��' \ I ----- — L----- -r _ 141 �� 5 s00009• ,�Ro�9 — — — — — — N79`5418"E tl 00 t ' \ / I . \ DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON p N CV ALL OF OUTLOT A / I \ �o \ / \// I I Iv I i S2 ► \ I 3 �L�, // I A A A K 1AF) I \\---------- rI 10 \ I 1vl,l v\L�I I 11 X OUTLOT 5 / 1 / ^ O ,�, / \ 6 _, Lij Lij 2 /'L9 ti,r G� 9 O a'o� i�� \ / `` .Y, _� I �J LIJ 'boo 3 c;61 ti 'o°. '�/�� 10 �a C� , / _ �_) I LI_I — J / , 0,9 GTZ.�, Q7e°. ^ �9CS �� I ,\l/ L��7 �/ ----J� QA °as °<<� `rF�'? ��'�T 12 rY; \ I ( ;, J 1` v o v / < 13 11 14 C �. I 0r Zo 16 IC In L T- `\ s� 10 O °c�� 1718 �6 3, Co �R4-7T1l 12 '30060 64I ^T_)r--r-T ►yAytr-^_TI\LLI ?0 jziS88°5052"E 322413 3 R=271.Os0 �, 94.0714 7 P/', ryI';!� BLOCK 215 2 93 4 5 6�7 8 9 10 so\ \ II I I II \ \\ IIIII ' \ 17 S8z g' R,s22 RA/NgGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK 2 N� �\ �9 18 19 4c4)°SO 43 L'188.110°37'17" N88°50-52"w 208.25 Zs,. \ ` ` "'O ,qB p /o L \ 20 ) o m s.ss °�°,,� a N88°50'S2"W 171.05 J v� \ `s�'• 21 ��i�°J O 1 11 �. °hh �� DELINEATED WETLANDdy21 \I \� \ �o �0 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 CH BRG-OUTLOT C r, v v i -i I v DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF OUTLOT C VICINITY MAP , \ DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK lb- __ — — — 631.97 _ NOT TO SCALE / / \ _ -_ = 88°50'52"W 1035.15 \ --Tr-�) /�I-)r71:71� i C.S.A.H. NO.39 / ul \v..:..:ll V\7 ..1 I r1 \ A f'1nITInN I + � FAIRWAY R. !G� hQ- SITE- ALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN OUTLOT A, OUTLOT B, OUTLOT C, LOT 21 OF BLOCK 1, LOT 11 OF BLOCK 2, LOT 11 OF BLOCK 3 AND LOT 21 OF BLOCK 4, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION HAVE BEEN VACATED PER DOC. NO. 15 3 lo343 —SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT C, \ COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION BEARING ORIENTATION: THE SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT C, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION, 1S ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 88°50'52'WEST 0 100, 200' 1 INCH = 100 FEET SCALE IN FEET ® = DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT • = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT O = DENOTES 1/2 INCH DIAMETER BY 18 INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Outlot A, Outlot B, Outlot C, Lots 1-21 of Block 1, Lots 1-11 of Block 2, Lots 1-11 of Block 3 and Lots 1-21 of Block 4 all in COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as COUNTRY CLUB MANOR THIRD ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness, whereof, said CHC Monticello Townhomes a Minnesota limited li bility comps as caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of . a 20 Signed: CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC Isleyy J. Butler, Executive Director STATE OF In."AW 415 0 rA COUNTY OF1>0 IkO Z74' This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 1 V % 20212by Wesley J. Butler, Executive Director, CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. -. _ ignature DP44402t,& print Notary Public, O T %4— County, Minnesota My commission expires / I, Jonathan D. Schuette do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this 2% day of Jt!(..Y 2013. D _ Jonathan D. Schuette, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 45352 STATE OF 0))NMEC0111""A /. COUNTY OF DA" 0e- The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me on this.2 day of , V ,20A-Sby Jonathan D. Schuette, a Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 45352. .`r ¢-_ signature AQ Ij CLiNfMZ-OS print Notary Public, _t>yArA o 7 County, Minnesota My commission expires CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Be it known that at a meeting held on this day of 20_14 the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, did hereby review and approve this plat of COUNTRY CLUB MANOR )ADDITION. Char person Secrets CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of COUNTRY CLUB MANOR THIRD ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello at a regular meeting thereof held this, day of C1 V-h6 , 20" and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. mzyor City Clerk ® WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accords cg with Minne to Statutes, ection 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this ,Iay of 20 13�69L Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY LAND RECORDS 2 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20013 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also pLL&uant to Minnesota Stages, Sectio.n127722.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of 20 R Wright County nd Records Administrator WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER tv% I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this 10 day of AV I- ,, 20o*N3 at D• 45 o'clock.& M. and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. Sleeve �J , as Document No. 1,5 3 b3ti4lo W U)&— ght Co Recorder DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING SHEET 1 OF 2 SECTION 10, T. 121, R. 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN 1 � ro DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF OUTLOT A 041 G, 0'� P I at COUNTRY CLUBlMA\40R TH :RD ADDIT ON \ rNI I ITS)\/ / �L/LJI V I I\ I `r // N0 //� \ // r , A ^)I' u lJ lJ 1 V 1 / 1 1 \ I •• / / / / '� 1 /\ I A \ ir-\ I r \ 4 A s0 09. / u�0 F �7g_37'34_E___- t \ .� // \ \/--------1---------I-------------------1- ----- _ / ---- 81.54- / co oM) o R \ O I ��// O p U_j o / �1 c ��pp °°\ \ /// / // I I L-:L_lJuf� I I I PARCEL LINE DATA d O� 5\� gyp% Sys / / \ / I I I ( I I LINE NO. LENGTH BEARING k\ °off .. 00 / \ \ / i J L1 37.45 S17° 16' 35"E 0' �� °9, �' L2 7.17 S41° 00'09"E TO N o GA \ / /�5p 3 O Or,\ o / / I I 1 I I L3 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E 0 0. �� `A� ! `°� O O / / \ I I 1 I I I L4 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E OUTLOT A COOAb"r 4 ^�,��,\ s'o°o // / I j \ I L5 7.17 S41' 00' 09"E / 00, \02° �p� j / \� � Op\ o�SF / n \ / / / / / / \ --1 I- �- I L6 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E \O °'/ 5 00 I / j / \ I L7 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E / \ I I I , Q°o \/ /�� 5 p�p0 ?°°\ �� -� o u / _ u 1 _ V L. v I L8 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E -t s�,6o to p0 ! s /�. ' / / \ i i i 1vAv r^-� \1' u i i \V/ I_ o tiA \ .0 �� h 6 p� / / ^ 00, ) \ I L9 12.00 S36o 15136"E \J V T L _ \rN J T rr�� O� ° o\ v °h0� / /g� �p s? o\ 09��'�i° `��' \ / \ - I L10 20.32 S49 29 00 E 189) �'�° ° % 6,A 7 O?\ °° °OF /`i� \ / \ I 00, L11 40.65 S27° 10'51"E ° °o\ s / / / 1 \ 60 \ I L12 40.42 N77° 01' 14"E cp py�p\ °o\ F�cF!sr ° �7 O\O po� SQ °9� /�// I 60 L13 20.36 S80° 41' 11 "E /lo 5e 1 Op .00\ O �!/� C-C o \° goo S��/ / / op °`o0 0°,0� (jam \ (1� r I LI J I L14 12.11 N86° 10' 33"E / 0, �j0/ / ��` 0\ �. \ 1 1 LIJ \ '>'� - '�^ I L15 7.17 S88° 50' 52 E L 1 I L16 7.17 S88° 50' 52'E kp lip gip ��/ / o oa\ °OOFZT A°o \/ /��p v pip ?0°\ \ / LI�_ ° 0 / 0 0 y, \ - L17 20.35 S23° 04' 42"E O°O�h� / /�p�,. °\ F° ti x °'p !�` �0 10 op / s '% %� \ ` LI J l 1_ sr -1 / n 9/ \• p °� / /\ FJ ° L el ( L18 18.94 N2° 29' 34"E 3 00 `�� °° loc` l ` '�\ ti9 �'r \ ono I u °* O/ / s\ °o \7 \ / �� \ p� °o !o <� �'6` o0 5 �h'` / /0�00 `000\ °O� �� r / (� t\ I /1 ^) I - - I L19 7.17 N88° 50' 52"W �G c" N§ �p5/ �� e -------- -I------_._.-----( < s O 4 O/ / „�° �! ll-� !, 6, \ / To \ \ I _ L20 12.02 S89° 18' 06"W ?s, '�5'�° \ 5°� / o\ oo, o C_ / F Ao \/ / Qe 11 po ?O\ ` L21 14.29 N80° 56' 25"W 00, r �`'� / oR�° r'00\ 0`9 O�sr ° l \� i i ° \ h I 09 \`�? 04' �F. FS !6 ` O h� Op y �-" \ \ ( t L22 14.41 N74° 35' 15"W 5j ?00 , 2Q stir ,� \?00 �5� 12 j / /� \ 'o \ / \ - ; �' E h J 7° 5T 0 7 / d O, °� p 019 / \ \ _ L23 20.30 N8° 35' 11 "E O 5 Orh�p ?°o ��7 / °oo °tiy!o o\ 5 ��y/ / / /� Oo\ � / \ !O A. \�'c' 0.0/ ��' GA \ / / ( \ \ 1 �t^J L24 20.39 S41' 51' 06'W s 2 l - 0? h°'�^ 6 O°j / ^ �'i° �'�° sv � \0° "/ /°5°'O 13 p 0�\, °° I I / \ L25 13.94 N55° 02' 23"W txb °� / a2\ 00, 00, ?2 0� o \/ / op , ; Ro 0\ / \ g \/ / p0 o O O O 0 i\, 0 O / L26 14.27 N48° 13' 32'W o°b O hq�/ / pk. o\ 9F A°e 09 '� !� \ I ��e \ \00 5 j / /�/c,G 0\ �� o�O s�,�,? lo�,� � \`�?p0 ��ca`' A14 �� / / /\ S ��O / / I \ \ I / L27 12.20 N38° 40' 24"W �' _ 7 p�po 00\ 8 > > 0 0\ 5 I->�� / /p�po s?\°o\ o9F / / �: I \ \ 1 / / I L28 7.17 N41 ° 00' 09"W -v <?° 9p\� D Oo/ /� 4'� 9� \ �00 `'j / /o,O\� \ sQ00 \ I \ I / I L29 7.17 N41 ° 00' 09'W 9�'�Q/° \° g�Op $,��j % 0 0?\ o0o ^15 p'Op ?00\ \ I / I L30 7.17 N41 ° 00' 1 T'W 2 00o a oo�5j�� g� /y °0 c � / 5 `G \ .° h 16 /� DO'S' 1 , i<< L31 7.17 N41 00' 09'W g ko 00\ 21 0 , �, y\ / p0 ?0 \'s, S6 \ \ 1 \ i / / I L32 7.17 N41 ° 00' 01 "W l00 O� O�� pp/� � \`??° ytx j / �Q, �?O �`/9 9� I L33 7.17 N41 ° 00' 17"W \ \•0 5� p� n Ate° \o / /�� °�\ o a?o� I I / _ �ko ^1 O^�/ O?p ' O°O"' r 7 po °o\ gu', 0y I I / I L34 19.84 N31 ° 3T 44"E O l u 'b >h O\ S)� r)l, / 4Q S \\7 00 \O?O p�/ / / �� ESQ � I <O d 7� pp/9 \ 0� �g p a1 °O \?°° 3� 18 j a2\ o2F s PARCEL CURVE DATA Np5 11 A� o°\ �'' /° \ `'� �S% `bs�/ /p° °°\o - 7 T I I -T r r_ T _ •� O �O�/ \ O ` �> _ - / r- �- CURVE NO. ARC LENGTH RADIUS DELTA \L,.p ��/ /h°tv o 1? .0\ / I r I I \ L_ L_ I V V Cl I \?°o h�'p 12 O��/' V 19 a ° 20.53 60.00 019°36'32" 60 / -19 /\ 0 I ` �\ / /gyp 0°\ o9q °° /2�h ' w o H / C -1 \ 4p0 S7g°0 <,<� O°9� \`�? �e`'? / /fie Fo / .1 20 / o R, BRG_ !y , g /O\ sr /O ;�` �* ^ _ - s> 2'00"E \ � t, \ / / o; �'\ Op 0 \`61 32 h 7^ /� ' �4 \ 4=19°3T CH=136.59 `) 6'Q h O ? 2 \ 00 co �V ° ti' 87 ° 44" L_ I \ �p ; 13 pro 0L, 'S'��Q261 � ° \ / ,y`b `� ��, 5 3g26 F s4 -137.26 " S88°50'52"E 322.43 \7 ! O K, ^ O S �''`\S' 4 °S�' , \32 /h 'v� / / %�3� °p S85°17'S3"E ° 228.36 c. / %^ `'S \.0 �h �0/ /� �S° S/, 20° �'� �O / g`� ry o 200 Q 64.00 S88°50'52"E 64.00 S88 50'52"E 64.00 S88°50'52"E 64.00 /' \ ! -,b 14p/ / °�\ �'o '92 a8 sA0 �/ o / ry / 32.00 _ Q 4 Sap - p - � - 00, O i `r popj / Op O\ F6, F S' 21 �`� 41, i /.!� vo o / I- 32.00- 32.00 32.00 T2. ' _ _ _ - p O, \? p0 / ��, sr 0,5, ./ ti v / `� v I o o r o32.00 32.00 32.00 -1 (- 32.00 32.00 O � 00 �88`�7 \`<� \ o N/ 1 2 w/ I o o f t o Cl Clcl, l t Cl 0 0 l t o Cl 0( N O •O\ 3 v my coo co o 0 15 ° ° / ,, / I 3 4 I I I Ico co �I Ico co h v \ � ! p i ss� v\.� s° co z �/ N 3 31 I 5 �� 6� 1 I P 7 I I W � I DETAIL A o/ /� °s o / av IN o r o 0 0 o 0 o 8 o co g �10 01 P NOT TO SCALE \ - \' °3�p 16 / / `�? ssr2, Sj3 864 S6 co / v v ' v l l Clo b)1 1 / b) 1 1 o N �i O\ F 8, 0" 3 I c o o rn o G G) l n �/ �gS° \ �h h� / / ° Gg l �\60 o- L12 _ L `.Oo 3 �/ Z g of 10 0 01 10 S' ''I I' 'v of �,, a �� / /� °\ °o ``2� °o ' - N�5° ''2 ooJ I I z m co I I z $ � Z co o ^ r- / /-\ t\ 1 11 co L. L/ / \ I I \ /� I L _ \ , i/ O� \�'° / /^� p ?0� ?7g 3828" L 32.00 I I I z "L_ U V I V LJ N88°50'52 W 171.05 I, -� ?y/O� o BC W 64 °p _ _ _ - _ _ 32.00 J L 32.00 - 32.00 J L 32.00 - 32.00 /� _ _ - J L 32.00 - 32.00 J 17 �tk `S'S8° 1. 1 L13 N85°1753-W 6400 �L14� N88°50'52 W 64.00 �L15� N88°50'52�W 64.00 L16 N88°50'52�W 64.00 �r �/ .1 -, p /� 76, R, R, K 2 1z6.13 cam/ 44.92 \ O° /�� I / ^ 1 $// / 32�°\ °gF 5826) CH B d'2p° L�r V�'f \ 11 I �� <�t 22 7 L_ t O Ssr R 371 �/� L� �6, u�2 p 00 dR Q� G:S7g° 1�" L- i DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK C1 BLOCK 3 �� \ \D° �� ^`b / hD' a2 4)S 32'14"E-188.11 b ti' n �\\ IR � / /� O� Q. 0' CH=187.10 N88°50'52"W 208.25 0` 50, 100, S88°50'52"E 64.00 =/ _oo ° 6S6? 043" �c4 I �� / �y0 s;Sssr ?00 co C", 8/ 04�4 8656 / 2 a 1 g 1 INCH = 50 FEET _ 32.00 - 32.00 4 \ O S' \ o S M \ems° sal sA°o �/ .1p//�� G �20 / h tell" i 1 ° os,• SCALE IN FEET I OAS \O�sr �S `\?OD g"' 5 ^ah `� O O�� /J'4$2"F 64 �i�, = DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT �., a Z v ,a ry A v 3 � 00 4; ° U '�S �� / P J� l 2 °° S7 21 02 41" I N88°50'52'W 171.05 / 1 • = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT I !\\ ., 32 co 2 /tr O o -- 7°52' L=214. 1 W sr 1 76� \ 'OO / h � � 0 32 ° 52"E 01 n o I o ?) �l/ °4 a� Q4�kiOk /� o o 64.00 Nv o 2 < �/ ^ O v co o /�32 00 S84°25'07"E 64.00BLOCK 3 126.13 I oo 44.92 N rJ = DENOTES 1/21NCH DIAMETER BY 18 co I \ ° e L�� fsg°0 �� Qy /� c a /o 3260 S88 50'52"E 64.00 S88°50'S2"E 64.00� I h^ INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT / t /o o Oa _ _ p _ _ to Q _ p ry m SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352 9 10 I : O h . 1 /a o ' a2.o`o - ---�- �,� A 1�1\1T1/-\r` I �`/ I- 32.00 w C' /° o / 1- 32.00 32.00 (-32.00 32.00 1 I^ I � \ %f�'` O UTLOT B C 2 �/ 1W to o I I , r-\ LJ v I I I � I N o ,V U y /a 2 h/ 0 3 °'/ I o 0 0 o Ig o of N�o° 1 \ \Jv I L_V I L, moo IN "'/ 5 3 I I_ �I IW ► A to 1 /11 ITI /\T '� L32 O �/ /o 04 �/ Iw o I 1� �1 I� co 1 �1 rn1\ OfZ'6 5 BEARING ORIENTATION: 1 O 32 / o t o 16 M g I r I $1$ THE SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT C, COUNTRY CLUB \ � 0 N7 14' ` �o l Z I •� `* I 10 o m I DEAR NORTH 88°50'52"WEST MANOR SECOND ADDITION, IS ASSUMED TO J 7° / a. 0 -7 I I- 0101 0) � \�-DETAIL"A" vv I L_v I v `Z nl ITI /'\T /� �s� S2W L 32.00 IZ a �I I� / �I Ip w o NI \64. 1�1 -----� �'' �I n/�It �°° C2? - 32.00J 32.00 �' co�I IZ �I 1z $ ��1 �I OUTLOT C L,L.v�r \ ., L - O IN 9& 18.21 1 152'52„ 64.00 _ _CJ _ _ 32.00 J L 32.00 - 32.00 J L 32.00 _ 32.00 _I of 32-C1 32 00 W L21 I �I DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF OUTLOT C 88 1 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT Nam, ��_� - N88°50' .97 64.00 �� / ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK 3 2507"VV 64.00 L20 N88°50'52W 64.00 L19 N88°50'S2"W 64.00 I 384.97 ' ' 1 1 631.97 / / i i 384.97 N88°50'52"W1035.15 // \ �631.97 - DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ` \ VVV --SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT C, COUNTRY N88° 50'S2"W 1035.15 - - - AND LAND SURVEYING CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION SHEET 2 OF 2 City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2K. Consideration of accepting the conveyance of a 4.81-acre stormwater parcel, Outlot A, Great River Addition, from the Economic Development Authoritv (EDA) to the Citv of Monticello Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Economic Development Manager 2/26/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Community Development Director, Finance Director, City Engineer ACTION REQUESTED Approved by: City Administrator Motion to accept the conveyance of a 4.81-acre stormwater storage pond parcel, Outlot A, Great River Addition, from the Economic Development Authority (EDA) to the City of Monticello. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to accept ownership of a stormwater parcel along 7t" Street West. The Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) received the 4.81-acre parcel in December 2023 as part of a land acquisition from Riverwood Bank. While the City has an easement over the parcel for any needed drainage system improvements, Riverwood Bank offered the stormwater storage pond site to the EDA as part of the land sale package. Riverwood Bank could no longer hold the land tract on its books due to banking regulations. At the time of the purchase, staff felt it would be prudent to have the EDA acquire the stormwater pond site along with the 14.61-acre vacant development parcel as it provides required stormwater management for the acquired development land. Wright County's 2023 taxable market value of the parcel is $10,500. City staff filed the paperwork with the County to categorize this parcel as tax exempt in the future. The EDA approved the conveyance of the parcel to the City by Quit Claim Deed at its regular meeting on February 14. The Quit Claim Deed as well as an aerial photo and the plat illustration of the parcel are included in the exhibits in this report. Budget Impact: The budget impact related to the land conveyance is minimal. Minor legal costs were incurred related to the preparation of the EDA resolution and the quit claim deed. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 II. Staff Workload Impact: In-house staff involved in this effort consisted of the Community Development Director, Community Economic Development Coordinator, Finance Director, and the Economic Development Manager. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend the City Council accept the transfer of the 4.81-acre stormwater parcel from the EDA to the City. The site is not developable and is dedicated for the purpose of serving as part of the regional stormwater management system in this area along 71" Street West. SUPPORTING DATA A. Quit Claim Deed B. Aerial Photo and WC Beacon Information Report C. Plat Illustration — Outlot A, Great River Addition QUIT CLAIM DEED Deed Tax Due: $ Consideration for this transfer is less than $3000.00. ECRV: NA Date: FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to the City of Monticello, Minnesota, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee, real property in Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Outlot A, Great River Addition. Check here if part or all of the land is Registered (Torrens) O together with all hereditaments and appurtenances. X The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. ❑ A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document or has been electronically filed. (If electronically filed, insert WDC number: ). ❑ 1 am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. MN325\50\927809.v1 GRANTOR: CITY OF MONITCELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By Steven Johnson, President By James Thares, Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA SS COUNTY OF WRIGHT The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 2024, by Steven Johnson and James Thares, the President and Executive Director, respectively of the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Authority"), on behalf of the Authority, Grantor. NOTARY STAMP This instrument was drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT Tax Statements should be sent to: City of Monticello, Minnesota 505 Walnut Street, #1 Monticello, MN 55362 NM325\50\927809.v1 Ir/ 0,,Beacon Wright County, MN AaPa��,�c� Legend Roads — CSAHCL — CTYCL --- MUNICL — PRIVATECL — TWPCL Highways —, Interstate State Hwy US Hwy City/Township Limits ® c 0 t Q Parcels Torrens Date created: 2/6/2024 Last Data Uploaded: 2/6/202411:19:26 AM Developed by" Schneider GEOSPATIAL 2/6/24, 3:19 PM Beacon - Wright County, MN - Report: 155226000010 Wright County, MN Summary Parcel ID 155226000010 Property Address Sec/Twp/Rng 11-121-025 Brief Tax SECT-11 TWP-121 RANGE-025 GREAT RIVER ADDITION Description OUTLOT A (Note: Not to be used on legal documents) Class 233 - 3A COMMERCIAL LAND AND BUILDING District (1101) CITY OF MONTICELLO-0882 School District 0882 (Note: Class refers to Assessor's Classification Used For Property Tax Purposes) GIS Acres Parcel: 155226000010 Acres: 4.81 Acres USAB: 4.81 Acres WATE: 0.00 Acres ROW: 0.00 Sq Ft: 209,686.52 Owner Primary Owner CITYOF MONTICELLO EDA %EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 505 WALNUT ST SUITE 1 MONTICELLO MN 55362 Land Unit Eff Seq Code CER Dim 1 Dim 2 Dim 3 Units UT Price Adj 1 Adj 2 Adj 3 Rate Div % Value 1 Cl WASTE 0 0 0 0 209,686.000 S 0.050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.050 1.000 10,500 Total 209,686.000 10,500 Recent Sales In Area Sale date range: From: 02/06/2021 To: 02/06/2024 Sales by Neighborhood C:Sales by Subdivision l 1500 Feet v I Sales by Distance J Transfer History Grantor Grantee Recorded Date Doc Type Doc No RIVERWOOD BANK CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 12/20/2023 LWD 1544725 RIVERWOOD BANK; CITY OF MONTICELLO GREAT RIVER ADDITION 12/9/2013 PLT 1253597 Note: Transfer History data is from Land Link beginning 01/01/2003. Valuation 2023 Assessment 2022 Assessment 2021 Assessment 2020 Assessment 2019 Assessment + Estimated Land Value $10,500 $6,700 $4,800 $4,800 $4,800 + Estimated Building Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 + Estimated Machinery Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 = Total Estimated Market Value $10,500 $6,700 $4,800 $4,800 $4,800 % Change 56.72% 39.58% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% https://beacon.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?APPID=187&LaverlD=2505&PageTvpelD=4&PagelD=1310&KevValue=155226000010 1/3 2/6/24, 3:19 PM Taxation Beacon - Wright County, MN - Report: 155226000010 2022 Payable 2021 Payable 2020 Payable 2019 Payable Estimated Market Value $4,800 $4,800 $4,800 $4,800 - Excluded Value $0 $0 $0 $0 - Homestead Exclusion $0 $0 $0 $0 = Taxable Market Value $4,800 $4,800 $4,800 $4,800 Net Taxes Due $136.00 $136.00 $140.00 $144.00 + Special Assessments $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 = Total Taxes Due $136.00 $136.00 $140.00 $144.00 Change 0.00% 7 % 0.00% Taxation (Preliminary 2023 Taxes Payable) 2023 Proposed 2022 Payable Estimated Market Value $6,700 $4,800 - Excluded Value $0 $0 - Homestead Exclusion $0 $0 = Taxable Market Value $6,700 $4,800 Net Taxes Due $174.00 $136.00 + Special Assessments $0.00 $0.00 = Total Taxes Due $174.00 $136.00 % Change 27.94% 0.00% Taxes and Special Assessments Payable in 2023 are preliminary. Taxes Paid Receipt # Receipt Print Date Bill Pay Year Amt Adj Amt Write Off Amt Charge Amt Payment 1802712 10/14/2022 2022 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($68.00) 1763859 5/11/2022 2022 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($68.00) 1729628 10/14/2021 2021 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($68.00) 1693460 5/11/2021 2021 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($68.00) 1655059 10/15/2020 2020 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($70.00) 1609925 5/7/2020 2020 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($70.00) 1578690 10/15/2019 2019 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($72.00) 1546095 5/15/2019 2019 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($72.00) 1498075 10/12/2018 2018 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($69.00) 1467459 5/16/2018 2018 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($69.00) 1422862 10/16/2017 2017 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($70.00) 1373150 5/9/2017 2017 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($70.00) 1322577 10/11/2016 2016 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($74.00) 1291558 5/16/2016 2016 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($74.00) Map No data available for the following modules: Land GA/RP, Buildings, Extra Features, OBY, OBY (Working 2024 Assessment), Sales, Photos, Sketches. https:Hbeacon.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?ApplD=187&LaverlD=2505&PageTYpelD=4&PagelD=1310&KevValue=155226000010 2/3 / / GREAT RIVER ADDITION ----------- I ELM87PtEE7-- T Lil om Mau — ws.cs• WE - - - - - - - - a Tin .. .31 - - - - 1. viaF - — - — - — - — - — - OUTLOT A �sa A4 m7.lt,4T-w owwrommomI 0.00 t JIM701111.70HOMWl".11ANWIS omorc.APIMPTpr. V, +•«tanos■e+wreevrArr,l�r "N � mme A - - - - - - — - — - — ---- /, � � � r--neur�Afouan,• j oor 33.004- ',/-WMWrASTRW7 OUTLOT C — N-1 4=mmm— 1373-37 3.0.31 I 26.06-< 33 DMOAMM su-54-WW Ng 7FH alpmer S N� I 33 -A 211.17 "P59-n-W S3.01 sorte'sr, OUTLOT 9 41" 14 34.31 V71*51 THE WMH LINE OF THE WFITH In SW"IEAST 114 SECTICH 10. TOPUSHIP 12'; RAMM 25 HAS AN ASSUMED WEARING or S 11-50-22-E m xwh k.,* smit, a& a 419 NFwxrmmLlw BMW", SHEET 2 OF 2 City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2L. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-18 authorizing submission of a 2024 Outdoor Recreation Grant application for West Bridge Park improvements Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Parks & Recreation Director 2/26/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED City Administrator Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-18 authorizing submission of a 2024 Outdoor Recreation Grant application for West Bridge Park. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND West Bridge Park and its playground are popular, frequently used parts of Downtown Monticello. However, the existing playground equipment is 25 years old and planned for replacement. Monticello strives to replace equipment after approximately 15-20 years of use, extending equipment life when possible. While the existing playground remains safe for play, it has limited accessibility and lacks more recent features like specialized areas to engage different age groups. When the Downtown Roadway & Pedestrian Improvement project is completed in 2024, the south and west edges of the park will have been updated with pedestrian safety and accessibility improvements. With the edges finalized, it will be possible to initiate replacing the outdated playground equipment with a multi -age, safety -compliant, and ADA accessible alternative. To facilitate this more inclusive, enhanced playground, the City Council is asked to authorize an application to the MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) 2024 Outdoor Recreation Grant Program. Grant award recipients are reimbursed up to 50% of total eligible costs with a maximum award of $350,000. Staff propose to apply for the maximum amount. The Outdoor Recreation Grant is designed to assist local governments in acquiring, developing or redeveloping parkland. The 2024 funding comes from the Land and Water Conservation Fund, a federal funding source. Applications to the program are due April 1, 2024, and awards are expected to be made this summer. If awarded, projects must be completed by June 30, 2026. The grant application requires detailed information on the project scope, implementation schedule, environmental considerations, plan design, and preliminary estimates for overall project cost and funding. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 The new playground details a river-themed design and incorporates a destination play value to draw people into the downtown. In anticipation of replacing the existing equipment, city staff participated in public engagement at community events to gain feedback about the future of the playground. The current concept incorporates those public comments into the design. The new playground keeps the bright blue color and uses a river-themed design. It consists of a unique twin tower design for age groups 5-12 and a smaller apparatus for ages 2-5. The features include more play values geared toward the 7-12 age group and incorporate elements such as additional swings, wheelchair -accessible playground equipment, a zipline, shade structure, and bigger slides. The entire playground surfacing is planned to be rubberized playground surfacing material. The City's 2025 CIP includes $1,500,000 for West Bridge Park improvements. Costs associated with the improvements include site grading, a playground sidewalk loop, playground surface, and playground equipment. The estimated playground installation costs excluding sidewalks is $700,000. If awarded the full amount of $350,000, the required City of Monticello match of $350,000 will be used for the site improvements. However, the local match amount is subject to change based on the final grant award amount. In addition to pursuing grant funds, the Monticello Lions have generously committed $250,000 toward the playground. The new playground is planned for installation in 2025 pending available funding sources. The old playground will stay in place until funding is secure and materials for the new playground have arrived onsite. The Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission supports applying for grant funds to use toward replacing the playground at West Bridge Park. Please note, submitting an application does not obligate the city to accept a grant award; grant acceptance and local match authorization would be a future City Council consideration. Budget Impact: If grant funds are secured for the improvements, the City's local match for application is $350,000 from the Park and Pathway Fund. II. Staff Workload Impact: The grant requires a detailed application; staff time is estimated at 60 hours. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes commitments to both Downtown Monticello and the local parks system. This project reinvests in those assets for the long-term benefit of residents and visitors to the community. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends applying to the 2024 Outdoor Recreation Grant Program to help fund the improvements to West Bridge Park. The playground is planned for replacement, but funding support is critical to completing it in a timely manner. SUPPORTING DATA • Resolution 2024-18 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-18 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR WEST BRIDGE PARK IMPROVEMNTS BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Monticello act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the Outdoor Recreation Grant application to be submitted on April 1, 2024, and that Tom Pawelk_is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Natural Resources for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Monticello. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant has read the Conflict of Interest Policy contained in the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Manual and, upon discovery, certifies it will report to the State any actual, potential, or perceived individual or organizational conflicts of interest to the application or grant award. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Monticello has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and it has the financial capability to meet the match requirement (if any) and ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Monticello has not incurred any development costs and has not entered into a written purchase agreement to acquire the property described in the Cost Breakdown section on this application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Monticello has or will acquire fee title or permanent easement over the land described in the site plan included in the application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, upon approval of its application by the State, the City of Monticello may enter into an agreement with the State for the above -referenced project, and that the City of Monticello certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement including dedicating the park property for uses consistent with the funding grant program into perpetuity. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Parks, Arts & Recreation Director is hereby authorized to execute such agreements as necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello on February 26, 2024. 1 SIGNED: (Signature) WITNESSED: (Signature) (Title) (Date) (Title) (Date) City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2M. Consideration of approving updates to Riverside Cemetery Rules and Regulations Prepared by: Parks & Recreation Director Reviewed by: Parks Superintendent ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date: 2/26/2024 Approved by: City Administrator Motion to adopt updates to the Riverside Rules and Regulations. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND ❑x Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item The Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission maintains rules and regulations for the operation, maintenance, use, and protection of the municipal cemeteries. The City of Monticello is a member of the Minnesota Association of Cemeteries, which is a resource for vital information on a variety of topics, including laws affecting cemetery operations, real estate matters, and insurance issues. Staff proposes the following changes regarding deeds, monument work and fall cleanup. 4.1 DESCENT OF GRAVES or COLUMBARIUM NICHE or OSSUARY SPACE On the death of a deed/Certificate owner, shall be ^ n+ d and cenveyed by the City to +hcrre dese^en nt'6 6b riftheFene3u'tH't ing speuse, then to the dies - ndapt'r Ldr,r+ s uryi"in,. ehil.d. if +h r n., rY FViViRg Child then to +hr, dr,s n.Jan+'s yeYnger+ riw"i"ing ribling� OTtheFe Is rav l,� difrsspeyse, child er rihliY g Gf the d sc n.J n+ aR d the gFavr,/r1 /niGheS, - r e 1A A+ rA..d h-,.-I. +A the City of nn n+„- II duFing the alti mini5trxian of the descendant's estate r eth r" r n Wed feF by w64 the City m eenvey the r e(s) /nigh s to a of the deseennt'G gents, Gih!ings-eF unless designated by the original certificate owner either to the cemetery, on the original certificate or in a will or trust, no additional burials will occur in any one grave. Graves that remain unassigned will be reclaimed by the cemetery after 60 years of no burial or assignment. 6.3 CITY HOLIDAYS City Holidays are as follows: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr Day, President's Day, Memorial Day, Juneteenth, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day and the day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. If a family chooses a burial the day following a holiday — the family will be charged the City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Public Works Labor fee as stated in the most current fee schedule for time spent preparing for burial. New 10.13 - These rules apply to all memorial and monument work. Before placing an order with such a company, care should be taken in selecting a reputable dealer who understands the Riverside Cemetery Rules and Regulations to avoid difficulties which may arise in cases where memorial or monument work ordered does not comply. 10.14 - No lot owner shall erect or place, or cause to be erected or placed, on a lot in Riverside Cemetery, any marker not approved by the City of Monticello. The City reserves the right to reject any memorial or monument by reason of failure to abide by the rules and regulations governing memorials or monuments and its installation. 10.18 - When a funeral or interment is being conducted nearby, all work of any description must cease. 12.9 - Fall cemetery grounds maintenance will be scheduled by the Parks Superintendent based on the weather conditions once a majority of the leaves have fallen. The contracted maintenance company will be notified one week in advance and will be responsible for the complete cleanup of leaves, once notified. Budget Impact: None II. Staff Workload Impact: Management of contract agreements. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION It is the recommendation of City staff and the Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission to adopt the changes to the Riverside Rules and Regulations. SUPPORTING DATA • Riverside Rules and Regulations �)Il1�K:11�1. Est. 2001 RULES & REGULATIONS Z ! r 1 r. 4 IL VA CIO I r�Lt � II t CITY OF MONTICELLO RIVERSIDE CEMETERY RULES & REGULATIONS Est. 2001 Table of Contents 1. PURCHASE OF GRAVES: .............................................................................................................................. 2 2. CONDITIONS OF GRAVE PURCHASE: .......................................................................................................... 2 3. TRANSFER OF GRAVES: .............................................................................................................................. 3 4. DESCENT OF GRAVES or COLUMBARIUM NICHE or OSSUARY SPACE: ....................................................... 3 5. BURIAL PERMITS: ....................................................................................................................................... 3 6. INTERMENTS: ............................................................................................................................................. 4 7. COLU M BARI U M/OSSUARY:........................................................................................................................5 8. DELAY OF INTERMENT: .............................................................................................................................. 5 9. DISINTERMENTS:........................................................................................................................................5 10. MONUMENTS, MARKERS AND FOUNDATIONS: ......................................................................................... 6 11. PERMANENT CARE: .................................................................................................................................... 7 12. LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................................................................................... 8 13. PERPETUAL CARE: ...................................................................................................................................... 9 14. HOURS OF OPERATION: ............................................................................................................................. 9 15. GENERAL REGULATIONS: ........................................................................................................................... 9 16. PENALTIES: ............................................................................................................................................... 10 17. CEMETERY MANAGEMENT: ..................................................................................................................... 10 ATTEST............................................................................................................................................................. 12 F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: EFFECTIVE 11/01/01: AMENDED 01/22/2004 -PAGE 1 of 12 - MONTICELLO RIVERSIDE CEMETERY I1001*►qV_1I117:�Xeto] W_1IIIN] ►F61 EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 2001 AMENDED MARCH 9, 2015 AMENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 AMENDED 2019 AMENDED August 81h, 2022 1. PURCHASE OF GRAVES: 1.1 All fees or charges shall be set by the City Council and are payable to the City of Monticello at the Public Works Office located at 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362. 1.2 No grave shall be reserved with the intent to purchase for any reason. 1.3 Upon full payment of the purchase price of a grave, the City of Monticello will issue a cemetery deed/certificate of ownership conveying the grave, executed by the City, and the deed/certificate of ownership shall be recorded in the records of the City. Description of the grave/interment space will be in accordance with the cemetery plats, which are kept on file at the City Public Works Office. 2. CONDITIONS OF GRAVE PURCHASE: 2.1 All graves will be sold subject to these rules and regulations, or those hereafter adopted. The purchaser shall expressly agree, in the deed/certificate ownership conveying the lot their rights are subject to such reasonable rules and regulations as the City Council may adopt. The deed/certificate of ownership, and these rules and regulations, and any amendments, constitute the sale agreement between the cemetery and the lot owner. 2.2 No grave shall be used for any purpose other than the burial of human remains and the placing of appropriate memorials, as per the rules and regulations of the cemetery. 2.3 No easement or right of interment is granted to any grave owner in any road, drive, alley, or walkway within the Riverside Cemetery, but such road, drive, alley, or walkway may be used as a means of access to the owner's cemetery grave or graves. 2.4 The City reserves, and shall have, the right to correct any errors that may be made by it either in making interments, disinterment, or removals, or in the description, transfer, or conveyance of any interment property, either by canceling such conveyance and substituting and conveying in lieu thereof other interment property of equal value and similar location, as far as possible, or as may be selected by the City, or in sole discretion of the City, by refunding the amount of money paid on account of said purchase. In the event that such error shall involve the interment of remains of any person in such property, the City reserves, and will have, the right to remove or transfer such remains so interred to other property of equal value and similar location as may be substituted and conveyed in lieu thereof. F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: -PAGE 2 OF 12 - 3. TRANSFER OF GRAVES: 3.1 The owner of a cemetery grave may transfer the grave: 3.1.1 To the City of Monticello at the original sale price, 3.1.2 Any of his/her relatives, who may survive him/her by will for the use and benefit of the person designated in the will, or 3.1.3 To other persons not related to him/her. In all cases, the owner must complete and have signed by witnesses and a Notary Public, a Transfer of Ownership document provided by the City of Monticello. The transfer of ownership document must be approved by the City prior to the transfer of graves by the owner. When a transfer has been made in conformance with these rules, the City will issue a deed/certificate of ownership to the new owner. In all cases, a transfer fee payable to the City of Monticello will apply based upon the City's current fee schedule. 3.2 No grave will be permitted to be re -sold, disposed of, or otherwise used until the purchase price, and all unpaid charges, have been paid in full. 3.3 No cemetery grave may be re -sold or otherwise disposed of, without approval of the City of Monticello. 3.4 Grave owners may not allow interments to be made on their grave unless the transfer of grave process has been completed. 4. DESCENT OF GRAVES or COLUMBARIUM NICHE or OSSUARY SPACE: 4.1 On the death of a deed/Certificate owner, shall be gFeRted @Ad eeRveyed by the City to the de r�clant'c gar\,+vl*Hg spese. I# heice iffis He sHFYiY;,1g sf�ou_-,o, then + the ,--see-Rd pt' e4dost shied; ;f thep Fs e ser,,;, iHg ehuld theR t the ,- seeP&-,,it's yeyHges,t s + ibliN; if4heFens Hese sspseed-or sibling ef the desee^^'^A* qAd the gF@ ,e(s) /Hiehes - et -seld back to the Gity of MeRtieelle d F*Rg the -,d!nini_-)trctiaA efthe di;r-ppclant's 3ctu+o 3; eth,epw+se pFevided f^ by ill, +ham ''+t„H�ay seRveye gF@ ,e(S)/Rieh s t of the d s,., Rdc\nt's paron�;, :iblinb-s-Gend_-\nt; X_ it r unless designated by the original certificate owner either to the cemetery, on the original certificate or in a will or trust, no additional burials will occur in any one grave. Graves that remain unassigned will be reclaimed by the cemetery after 60 years of no burial or assignment. 5. BURIAL PERMITS: 5.1 A burial permit shall be issued and delivered to the City of Monticello for all burials in the cemetery. In the case of a cremation burial the certificate of cremation shall be delivered to the City of Monticello. F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: EFFECTIVE 11/01/01: AMENDED 01/22/2004 -PAGE 3 OF 12 - 6. INTERMENTS: 6.1 Deed/Certificate owners are granted only the right of interment in their columbarium niche, ossuary space or cemetery grave. The City of Monticello reserves the right to refuse to permit the interment of anyone who is not at the time the owner of the lot, or a relative of the owner, by blood or marriage. Permission, in writing, and with the seal of a Notary Public, of the grave owner must accompany all requests for permits to bury persons not members of the immediate family of the grave owner. 6.2 At least forty-eight (48) hour notice shall be given prior to the time set for the funeral service to assure a timely grave opening. 6.3 City Holidays are as follows: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr Day, President's Day, Memorial Day, Juneteenth, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day and the day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. If a family chooses a burial the day following a holiday —the family will be charged the Public Works Labor fee as stated in the most current fee schedule for time spent preparing for burial. 6.4 No casket shall be interred in the cemetery unless it is enclosed in a concrete vault or box. Ashes must be placed in a container prior to burial. 6.5 Should the grave owner or funeral director fail or neglect to designate the location, the City of Monticello reserves the right to make the interment in a location designated by the City. The City will not be responsible for any order given by telephone, or for any mistake occurring from the want of precise, proper instructions as to the particular location within a plot where interment is desired. 6.6 Interments are for the purpose of the human dead only. No pets, jewelry, artifacts, or other material items will be allowed to be buried. 6.7 The City will not be liable for the interment permit, nor the identity of the person sought to be interred. 6.8 No interment of more than one body shall be made in one grave, except in the following cases: 6.8.1 One adult and one child or infant. 6.8.2 Two infants or children. 6.8.3 Two urns of ashes, which may include two cremated remains in each urn. 6.8.4 One adult and one urn of ashes. 6.9 The cost of interments, including burial of ashes, shall be set by the City. 6.10 Payment in FULL of all fees, must be made prior to burial. F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: -PAGE 4 of 12 - 7. COLUMBARIUM/OSSUARY: 7.1 Ownership of interment space in a columbarium shall be considered the same as ownership of other cemetery property and shall descend according to state law. 7.2 No more than two urns or vases can be placed within a single niche. The urns must be either 5 %2" x 5 %2" x 7" square or a vase size of 10" high x 6" diameter. 7.3 The initial opening and closing of a columbarium niche for the interment of cremains is included in the sale price. However, applicable charges, to be paid in advance, will be levied for the opening of a sealed niche for any other reason. 7.4 The niche face plate is removed by the City of Monticello cemetery employees only. 7.5 Cremains will not be placed in the columbarium or ossuary by anyone other than a City of Monticello cemetery employee. 7.6 The etching of the niche face plate will be done by a contractor of the City of Monticello. 7.7 Flower holders, vases, or other fixtures shall not be allowed to be attached to the columbarium 7.8 Urn bags will be provided by the City of Monticello for the ossuary. 7.9 The City of Monticello will not buy back previously sold columbarium niches. If cremains are removed, the niche is forfeited back to the City of Monticello for re -sale. 7.10 The removal of the cremains from the niche shall be considered a disinterment. At that time the niche shall be forfeited to the City of Monticello and resold. The etched or engraved niche front shall remain the property of the family. The cost of replacing the double niche front and etching or engraving the adjacent "door" (if needed) back to exactly how it was shall be the responsibility of the City. 7.11 The City of Monticello is not responsible for any loss or damage caused by an act of elements, thieves, vandals or any malicious doings to personal property. 7.12 Ownership of interment space and their heirs must adhere to these regulations. 8. DELAY OF INTERMENT: 8.1 The City of Monticello will be in no way liable for any delay in the interment of remains when a protest to the interment has been made, or where rules or regulations have not been complied with. 9. DISINTERMENTS: 9.1 Written permission of the grave owner, and the next of kin, shall be filed with the City, and a permit from the County Health Officer shall be secured and presented, and the required fees paid before any grave may be opened for any purpose. At least thirty (30) days written notice must be given prior to any disinterment. This provision does not apply when disinterment is ordered by a duly authorized public authority. 9.2 The cost of disinterment will be the same as the current cost of interments unless otherwise stated in the fee schedule. 9.3 The City of Monticello will never disinter cremains once they are placed within the ossuary. F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: EFFECTIVE 11/01/01: AMENDED 01/22/2004 -PAGE 5 of 12 - 10. MONUMENTS, MARKERS AND FOUNDATIONS: OLD SECTION OF CEMETERY: 10.1 Every marker must be placed in the space reserved therefore, as shown upon the plat of such grave, or as directed by the City. 10.2 All monuments/markers in the old section shall be set at the head end and face east unless existing conditions warrant placing elsewhere. Such variances will be approved in writing by the City prior to monument/marker placement. 10.3 Monuments will be allowed in the old section of the cemetery only and are limited in size to a maximum of 36" for a single grave and a maximum of 72" for a double grave, including the 4" concrete border, or frosted granite or deluxe edge. 10.4 A foundation of concrete is required for monuments/markers. There shall be a minimum of 4" concrete border set at grade level. Setting of all monuments/markers shall be performed by the City or its approved contractor, or an accepted monument company. 10.5 The City requires that all above ground monuments/markers must be attached to the foundation by setting it into the wet cement, pinning it into the cement, or adhering it to the foundation using exterior adhesive for stones such as PL400. 10.6 A maximum of one upright monument or memorial bench monument and one flat marker will be permitted on any one grave in the old part of the cemetery. 10.7 Corner markers of like material may be placed on graves and/or lots in the old part of the cemetery only. Corner markers shall be no larger than 4" x 4" square and shall be placed flush with the ground. NEW SECTION OF CEMETERY: 10.8 The City requires that all flush markers in the new section of the cemetery shall be set at the head end and face east. 10.9 Only one marker will be permitted on any one grave in the new part of the cemetery with the exception of a veteran marker which may be placed at the foot end, unless otherwise approved by the City. 10.10 Monuments will not be allowed in the new section of the cemetery. Only flat markers of sizes specified by the City will be allowed in the new section of the cemetery. Marker size shall not exceed 2' x 3' for a single grave, 2' x 4' for a double grave, including the 4" precast concrete border, or frosted granite or deluxe edge. All markers shall be uniform in thickness and a minimum of 4" thick with the exception of the brass veteran markers. Markers embracing more than two graves will not be permitted, unless otherwise approved by the City. F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: -PAGE 6 of 12 - CREMATION SECTION: 10.11 Monuments in the cremation section of the cemetery are limited to a maximum size of 36" for a single grave plus a 4" concrete border or, or frosted granite or deluxe edge bringing the total maximum width to 44". INFANT SECTION: 10.12 Marker size of 14" x 18" for a single baby grave, including the 3" precast concrete or frosted granite border. No upright Markers to be placed of any kind in infant section. ALL GRAVES: 10.13 These rules apply to all memorial and monument work. Before placing an order with such a company, care should be taken in selecting a reputable dealer who understands the Riverside Cemetery Rules and Regulations so as to avoid difficulties which may arise in cases where memorial or monument work ordered does not comply. 10.14 No lot owner shall erect or place, or cause to be erected or placed, on a lot in Riverside Cemetery, any marker not approved by the City of Monticello. The City reserves the right to reject any memorial or monument by reason of failure to abide by the rules and regulations governing memorials or monuments and its installation. 10.15 No monument or marker, nor any part thereof, may be constructed of limestone, sandstone, or any artificial material. 10.16 Prior to any monument/marker placement or removal for repair the City or its approved contractor shall be contacted in order to stake the area and supervise the placement. 10.17 For all graves there will be a staking fee payable to the City of Monticello as listed in the City's current fee schedule. This fee must be paid IN ADVANCE of the staking performed by the City. 10.18 When a funeral or interment is being conducted nearby, all work of any description must cease. 11. PERMANENT CARE: 11.1 The general care of the cemetery is assumed by the City and includes the following: 11.1.1 Cutting of the grass at reasonable intervals; 11.1.2 Raking and cleaning of the grounds; 11.1.3 Pruning of the shrubs and trees that may be placed by the City; and Maintaining the general preservation of the graves and grounds, walks, roadways, boundaries, and structures, to the end that said grounds shall remain and be reasonably cared for as cemetery grounds. F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: EFFECTIVE 11/01/01: AMENDED 01/22/2004 -PAGE 7 of 12 - 11.1.4 The general care of the cemetery may be awarded by contract to private firms by the City as they see fit. 11.2 General care of the cemetery assumed by the City shall in no case mean the maintenance, repair, or replacement of any monument marker erected upon graves, nor the doing of any special or unusual work in the cemetery. 12. LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS: 12.1 Plants and flowers may be placed above ground, in pots on stands. Any pot placed on the ground will not be the responsibility of the City of Monticello, or its employees, should it be destroyed. Flowers and other items placed directly on the grave may be removed by the City prior to routine cutting of the grass. 12.2 No trees, shrubs, or vines may be planted, nor may fences be erected. The City reserves the right to remove any tree, shrub, vine, plant, or flowers which may become unsightly, dangerous, or not in keeping with the landscape design of the cemetery. 12.3 Pots, urns or stands that are left unused on a grave for a period of one (1) year will be removed by the City. 12.4 All landscaping, grading, and seeding shall be done by the City of Monticello or its approved contractor. All graves will be seeded and kept flush with the adjacent ground. When weather conditions allow, seeding will be done following the burial. 12.5 The City will make water available to grave owners for care of flowers and plants in pots, set in stands, from spring to fall of each year, depending on weather. Grave owners may water the grass covering their graves. 12.6 The City cannot be held responsible for any damages, loss, or theft, of any personal property such as flowers, plants, decorations, vases, crocks, markers, monuments, etc. 12.7 The last week in April will be designated as Spring Cleanup in the cemetery. Easter arrangements will be allowed one week before and one week after Easter. 12.8 The last week in October will be designated as Fall Cleanup in the cemetery. All items left on the ground will be disposed of and the City will not accept liability for such items. The City recommends that above ground pots and stands should be removed before the first freeze and can be replaced at the appropriate grave site after the completion of Spring Cleanup. If pots and stands are left year- round, the City will not accept responsibility for such items if they are destroyed due to weather, snow plowing, vandalism, etc. 12.9 Fall cemetery grounds maintenance will be scheduled by the parks superintendent based on the weather conditions once a majority of the leaves have fallen. The contracted maintenance company will be notified one week in advance and will be responsible for F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: -PAGE 8 OF 12 - complete clean up of leaves, once notified. 13. PERPETUAL CARE: 13.1 There shall be established a Perpetual Care Fund and all monies collected for perpetual care of graves shall be deposited in said fund and shall be kept separate from all other funds of the City. 13.2 The fee for perpetual care shall be fixed by the Council of the City by resolution. 14. HOURS OF OPERATION: 14.1 The cemetery will be open to visitors from sunrise to one half hour past sunset. Permission to enter at all other times shall be secured from the City. The City reserves the right to refuse admission to the cemetery and to refuse the use of any of the cemetery's facilities, at any time, to any person or persons whom the City may deem objectionable to the best interest of the cemetery. 15. GENERAL REGULATIONS: 15.1 Persons within the cemetery shall use only the paths and walkways, and no one is permitted to walk upon or across lots or graves unless it is necessary to do so to gain access to one's own lot. The cemetery expressly disclaims any liability for any injuries sustained by anyone violating this rule. 15.2 Persons visiting the cemetery or attending funerals are strictly prohibited from writing upon, defacing, or injuring any monument or marker, breaking or injuring any tree, shrub, plant, or other structure within the cemetery grounds. 15.3 The following acts are expressly prohibited, as well as any other violations of City Ordinances and regulations that may apply: 15.3.1 The driving of motor vehicles into the cemetery, unless attending a funeral, visiting a relative or a friend's grave site, or carrying on maintenance work authorized by the City. 15.3.2 The driving or parking of any motor vehicle across or upon any grave or lot. 15.3.3 Loud or boisterous talking or music. 15.3.4 Bringing of lunches or refreshments, including alcoholic beverages, into the cemetery or consuming them on the grounds. 15.3.5 Peddling or soliciting the sale of any commodity within the cemetery. 15.3.6 Placing of signs, notices or advertisements of any kind within the cemetery. 15.3.7 The throwing of rubbish on any part of the grounds. F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: EFFECTIVE 11/01/01: AMENDED 01/22/2004 -PAGE 9 OF 12 - 15.3.8 The walking of pets (including dogs, cats, or any other household pet) on any part of the grounds. 15.3.9 The driving or parking of any snowmobiles, ATV's or motorized off -road bikes on any part of the grounds. 15.3.10 The placing of glass containers or bottles on any part of the grounds. 15.4 Special cases may arise in which the literal enforcement or interpretation of a rule may impose unnecessary hardship. The City reserves the right to make exceptions, suspensions, or modifications of any of these rules and regulations, when in the judgment of the City such action appears necessary, and such a temporary exception, suspension, or modification shall in no way be construed as affecting the general application of such rules and regulations. 15.5 The City of Monticello reserves the right to amend these rules and regulations whenever it is determined that it is in the best interest of the cemetery to do so. Any and all amendments to these regulations will be approved by the City Council of Monticello. 15.6 The City of Monticello reserves the right to remove all monuments, markers, flowers, plants, trees, decorations, or other similar objects whenever any of these objects become unsafe, unsightly, dangerous, or not in keeping with the landscape design of the cemetery. 15.7 Specific costs for graves, interments, disinterment, burial of ashes, and setting monuments/markers are not included in these rules because of the necessity to revise these rates. A current schedule of fees can be obtained from the City. 15.8 Individuals with questions or concerns about cemetery operations shall report their concerns to the Office of Public Works and shall not delay, interfere with or harass City employees, authorized contractors, or agents of the City as they go about their duties in the cemetery. 16. PENALTIES: 16.1 Violation of the City Ordinance is considered a misdemeanor and the penalty is described by law. These cemetery rules and regulations are part of the City Ordinance and shall be enforced and penalties imposed for violation of such rules and regulations. 17. CEMETERY MANAGEMENT: 17.1 The responsibility for the management of Monticello Riverside Cemetery and all matters related thereto shall be vested in the City. 17.2 The Monticello Parks, Arts and Recreation Commission shall be the overseeing board for any maintenance or other issues with regard to Monticello Riverside Cemetery. F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: - PAGE 10 of 12 - ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS IN REGARD TO THE MONTICELLO RIVERSIDE CEMETERY RULES AND REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN SHALL BE DIRECTED TO: MONTICELLO PARKS DEPARTMENT 909 GOLF COURSE ROAD MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 55362 TELEPHONE: (763) 295-3170 FACSIMILE: (763) 271-3272 F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: EFFECTIVE 11/01/01: AMENDED 01/22/2004 -PAGE 11 OF 1 2 - ATTEST RIVERSIDE CEMETERY RULES AND REGULATIONS Updates to the Rules and Regulations for Riverside Cemetery were presented to City Council at their meeting on August 8, 2022, for approval upon recommendation of the Monticello Parks, Arts and Recreation Commission. APPROVED BY the Monticello City Council this 8th day of August, 2022. CITY OF MONTICELLO Llyod Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, City Administrator F:ADMIN\\WORDPROC\RIVERSID\RULES.FRM: - PAGE 12 of 12 - City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2N. Consideration of approval of the purchase of temporary construction easements for the 7th Street Retaining Wall oroiect Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Public Works Director/City Engineer 2/26/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A City Administrator ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the purchase of temporary construction easements for the construction of the 7th Street Retaining Wall Improvement Project in the amount of $12,500 for PID's 155068001020 and 155068000030 and for $11,300 for PID 155076001010. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION April 24, 2023: Approved preparation of a feasibility study and approved a contract with Hakanson Anderson for engineering services in the amount of $253,000. October 23, 2023: Approved a funding and construction agreement with Wright County. November 27, 2023: Accepted the feasibility study and set the public hearing for December 11, 2023. December 11, 2023: Ordered the improvement for the Broadway Street Roadway and Utility Improvement Project. January 22, 2024: Approved the plans and specifications and authorized to bid the Broadway Street Roadway and Utility Improvement Project and 7th Street Retaining Wall, RRFB, and Sidewalk Improvement Project. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Temporary construction easements are needed to reconstruct the retaining walls along west 7' Street adjacent to 206 7th Street West and 300 7th Street West. The easements will allow the contractor to perform work within the easement area and the walls will be reconstructed similar to the existing conditions. The construction and restoration required for this project is included in the Broadway Street Roadway and Utility Improvement Project and 7th Street Retaining Wall, Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB), and Sidewalk and Improvement Project that is currently out for bid. The anticipated bid opening date is March 18, 2024. Construction is anticipated to be completed in the summer of 2024 with substantial completion in the fall of 2024. City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 Appraisals were conducted for the acquisition of the temporary easements and the property owners have verbally agreed to provide the City with these temporary easements at the appraised amounts. The City Attorney's office has prepared temporary easements acquisition documents. I. Budget Impact: The project is to be funded from the Capital Projects Fund. The estimated project cost including engineering and material testing is $4,000,000. Wright County's share is estimated at $1,400,000 and $337,930 is proposed to be assessed as shown in the feasibility report. The 2024 budget includes $4,225,000 for the Broadway East, 7t" Street, and Prairie Center Parking Lot projects. II. Staff Workload Impact: Extensive staff time will be spent managing the project. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends acquiring the temporary construction easements to facilitate completion of the project. SUPPORTING DATA • Appraisals Report Type Appraisal Report Effective Date February 2, 2024 Prepared By: Ethan Waytas, MAI, Appraiser William R. Waytas, Appraiser File # G2401011 - BBF Properties Inc. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 12805 Highway 55, Suite 300 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Tel:952.544.8966 1 Fax:952.544.8969 NAGELL APPRAISAL INCORPORATED 12805 Highway 55, #300 Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 952-544-8966 Established in 1968 Fax: 952-544-8969 City of Monticello February 5, 2024 Attn: Craig Jochum, P.E., City Engineer 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 To Craig Jochum: In accordance with your request, an appraisal report has been made on the following described property: Subject Property: Commercial 206 7th Street West Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 Described below is a summary of the appraisal report contained herein. Property Overview The City of Monticello is proposing to replace a failing retaining wall along 7th Street West. The retaining wall is used to support adjoining parking lots and allow for a concrete sidewalk. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring temporary easements. The subject is improved with a multi -tenant commercial building. County information indicates the building was constructed in 1998 and has 75,528 SF of building area. The gross site area is 279,220 SF. The proposed project was concluded to not impact the subject building improvements. Therefore, only the land and any site improvements in the acquisition area are analyzed to conclude to damages. This report reflects the data found and the opinions concluded from a before and after value appraisal of the subject property (land only). Intended Use Acquisition negotiation purposes by the city Intended User(s) City of Monticello iii Letter of Transmittal - Continued Extraordinary Assumptions None Hvpothetical Conditions Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Propertv Riqhts Appraised - Fee Simple Interest: The subject is improved with a commercial building. Given the scope of the assignment, the appraisal reflects the fee simple interest. Propertv Components Appraised - Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. - Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment (FF&E): The appraised value does not include personal property or FF&E. - Business Value: The appraised value does not include business value. Hiqhest and Best Use Conclusions - As Vacant: Develop with commercial if the site was vacant. - As Improved: Not applicable given the scope of the assignment. Valuation Methodoloqv Given the nature of the project, only the land is being appraised and any site improvements in the acquisition area. • Before Value: The before condition reflects market value before the proposed acquisition. • After Value: The after value reflects the property after the acquisition which considers any changes in site size, new easements, loss of any site improvements, and/or any severance damages to the remainder (if appropriate). • Temporary Easement: A fair rate of return the property owner should receive for use of the temporary easement area during the easement period, if any. 1V Letter of Transmittal — Continued The property is legally described herein. The appraisal assumes that the property meets all current environmental standards. The appraisal analysis and conclusions are subject to certain limiting conditions and assumptions described herein. The final value opinion, as of February 2, 2024, is: Before Market Value (land value): After Market Value (land value): DAMAGES DUE TO ACQUSITION: Temporary Easement Cost: TOTAL (damages plus temporary easement cost): Exposure Time / Marketinq Time Exposure Time Marketing Time $2,025,000 $2,025,000 $0 $11,278 $11,300 rnd. Final values reflect "market exposure" time of 6 to 12 months before the effective date of the appraisal. Changes in the market, use, lease and/or building subsequent to the effective appraisal date could impact value. Marketing times for appropriately priced properties is generally 6 to 12 months +/-. Our company has 10 employees, has been in business since 1968 and has sufficient knowledge, education, experience, resources and/or contacts to competently complete this assignment. The accompanying report contains data secured from my personal investigation and from sources considered to be reliable; however, correctness is not guaranteed. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements contained in this report are true and correct. Neither my employment to make this appraisal, nor the compensation, is contingent upon the value reported. This report has been prepared in conformity with the code of professional ethics and standards of professional appraisal practice of the Appraisal Institute and appraisal standards set forth by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Please contact us if you have further questions. Sincerely, Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 www.nagelimn.com William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 131 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS ........................ VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY ..................... INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL..................................................... DATE OF APPRAISAL.............................................................................. SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT ................................................... PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED........................................................... PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED .............................................. IDENTIFICATION...................................................................................... REAL ESTATE TAXES............................................................................. SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY ............................................... REGIONAL DATA...................................................................................... REGIONALMAP....................................................................................... CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION .............................................. NEIGHBORHOOD MAP............................................................................ SURROUNDING USES............................................................................. BEFORE ANALYSIS................................................................................. SITE DESCRIPTION................................................................................. ZONINGMAP............................................................................................ ZONING..................................................................................................... FUTURE LAND USE MAP........................................................................ FLOODMAP.............................................................................................. AERIAL / PLAT MAP................................................................................. TOPOGRAPHY MAP................................................................................ WETLAND MAP........................................................................................ SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS..................................................................... HIGHEST AND BEST USE....................................................................... COST APPROACH.................................................................................... INCOME APPROACH............................................................................... SALES COMPARISON APPROACH........................................................ RECONCILIATION.................................................................................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME ................................................... AFTER ANALYSIS.................................................................................... PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................................................................ SKETCH OF ACQUISITION...................................................................... PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA ............................................. ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE ...................................................... SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES ..................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME ................................................... DEFINITIONS............................................................................................ ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES ......................................... EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ....................................... CERTIFICATION....................................................................................... CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER............................................................... QUALIFICATIONS..................................................................................... .. 7 .. 8 .. 8 .. 8 .. 9 10 10 11 11 12 13 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 40 40 41 58 58 59 60 61 63 65 67 67 68 69 69 70 72 73 74 SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS r, Location: 206 7th Street West, Monticello Project: Retaining Wall Parcel Number: n/a Appraisal Report: Appraisal Report Current Use: Commercial (multi -tenant retail) Extraordinary Assumptions: No, see rear of report for standard assumptions Hypothetical Conditions: Yes, see rear of report Site Area: 279,220 SF (6.41 acres) Building Improvements: Multi -tenant retail building Current Zoning: CCD, Central Community District (guided RC, Regional Commercial) Highest & Best Use: Commercial development (as vacant) Personal Property: No personal property included Property Rights Appraised: Fee Simple Right of Way Acquisition: None Existing Prescriptive Area: None Permanent Easement: None Temporary Easement 9,791 SF Temporary Easement Length: 18 months: February 2, 2024 to July 31, 2025 TOTAL DAMAGES & COSTS: $11,300 rounded Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 7 VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY Type of Value: This report provides an opinion of Market Value. Condition of Value: This report provides an opinion of the as -is value. Occupancy: The subject appears to be tenant occupied. INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL The client intends to use the appraisal for acquisition negotiation purposes. No party, other than the named client and listed intended users, may use or Intended Use: rely upon any part of this report without the prior written authorization of both the named client and the appraiser. This report is not valid unless it contains the original signatures in blue ink. Any unauthorized third party relying upon any portion of this report does so at its own risk. Intended User(s): City of Monticello DATE OF APPRAISAL Effective Date Inspection Date Date of Report: February 2, 2024 February 2, 2024 February 5, 2024 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT USPAP defines Scope of Work as: The type and extent of research and analyses in an assignment. For each appraisal, appraisal review and appraisal consulting assignment, an appraiser must: 1) 2) 3) 1) Identify the problem to be solved, 2) Determine and perform the scope of work necessary to develop credible assignment results; and 3) Disclose the scope of work in the report. Provide a reasonably supported value opinion as it relates to the intended use & scope. Per assignment request (retained in workfile), the following degree of research and analysis has been made. The narrative format used is an Appraisal Report, which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2a of USPAP. See individual approaches for further detail. The scope of work for this appraisal includes: • a) Property Identification: Public record, plat maps, zoning maps and aerial photographs were used to identify the subject property. • b) Property Inspection: A viewina of the subject orooertv and neiahborhood by the appraiser. Physical factors: Based on property viewing and conversations with the client, city and county officials. Lot size is based on county information. Economic Factors: Consisted of gathering of information from market experts, city and/or county offices, and internet about the region, community, neighborhood, zoning, utilities, and any pending projects in the area that may affect the subject property. c) Extent of Data Researched: Sales data of competing properties within the subject market area were given primary consideration. The most relevant data is used in this report. Sources include, appraiser data files, assessor, internet, developers, agents, MILS, periodicals, in -office library, etc. In addition, during the course of appraisal practice and of this appraisal process, the appraiser has had ongoing discussions with market participants (buyers, sellers, property managers, real estate agents/brokers, appraisers, etc.) and/or viewed market data in relation to how the current real estate market may impact the subject value. The appraiser has not researched the title or ownership records. • d) Type and Extent of Analysis Applied at Opinions or Conclusions: An extensive review of market data was performed. The most recent, similar and proximate data has been used. The data used will be adjusted on a grid. Reasonable and appropriate collection, verification, analysis and viewing has been performed in the valuation approaches, given the purpose and intended use of the report. A final value opinion will be discussed and correlated. The data used was obtained from sources considered credible, yet its accuracy is not guaranteed. If found otherwise, value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 9 PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED What is valued in a real property appraisal is an estate subject to specified interests. Therefore, an appraiser's task is to identify not only the estate (e.g., the fee simple estate, the leasehold estate, the leased fee estate, the life estate) but also the interests associated with the real estate, such as leases, easements, restrictions, encumbrances, reservations, covenants, contracts, declarations, special assessments, ordinances, or other interests of a similar nature. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, Page 59) Fee Simple Interest: Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7tn Edition) Note: This would typically reflect an owner -occupied property. When the property rights appraised are the unencumbered fee simple interest of the real estate, the appraised value is subject to normal easements for drainage, public streets and utilities, if any. The effect of any existing mortgage or delinquent taxes on the subject property has not been considered in this appraisal. Leased Fee Interest: The ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7tn Edition) In appraisal practice, the lessor's interest in a property is considered a leased fee regardless of the duration of the lease, the specified rent, the parties to the lease, or any of the terms in the lease contract. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 151" Edition, Page 62) Conclusion of Rights Appraised: The subject is currently used for commercial purposes. Given the scope of the assignment, the fee simple interest will be applied. PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. The methods utilized for the real estate valuation include: • Sales Comparison Approach FF&E: The appraised value does not include any values of fixtures, furnishings and equipment. Business Value: There is no business value included in the appraised value. Page 10 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 IDENTIFICATION Address: County PID: Legal: Fee Owner Census Tract # 206 71h Street West Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 155076000010 & 155076001010 155076000010: Sect11 TWP-121 Range-025 Monticello Mall Outlot A 155076001010: SECT-11 TWP-121 RANGE-025 MONTICELLO MALL LOT-001 BLOCK-001 BBF Properties Inc. 1002.03 REAL ESTATE TAXES Taxes, Total Effective Tax Special Assessments / Solid Waste Fee / Other Total Tax & Assessments: per County Records Payable 2023 $87, 792 LO $87,792 Delinquent taxes: I None noted COUNTY ASSESSOR'S VALUE Land Building TOTAL Payable 2023 $1,790,300 $1,666,100 $3,456,400 Payable 2024 n/a n/a n/a Payable 2024 $2,575,700 $1,571,500 $4,147,200 The subject tax ratio is 2.54%. The assessed value and taxes shown above reflect the overall property. The appraised value given in this report assumes any/all special assessments, and/or liens are paid in full and that there are no delinquent taxes, fees, payments, association dues, etc. Should it be found that any of these exist the amount should be deducted from the appraised value. Appraiser did not research these items; typically, a title search would reveal any of these. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 11 SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY Listing History: I The subject does not appear to be currently listed for sale. Sale Price: n/a Sale Date: n/a Buyer: n/a Seller: n/a Sales History: Terms: n/a Source: Public records No reported sales of the subject within the past 3 years. Pending Sale: I None noted or reported. The subject is improved with a multi -tenant commercial building. Public Building History: records indicate the building was constructed in 1998 and has 75,528 SF of gross building area. Lease History: I Lease information not available. Leasehold Interest: I None noted Association Dues: The subject is reportedly not part of an association or common interest community (CIC). Page 12 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL DATA Metro Area Regional hub Minneapolis -Saint Paul is the most populous urban area in Minnesota and is composed of 186 cities and townships. Built around the Mississippi, Minnesota and St. Croix rivers, the area is also nicknamed The Twin Cities for its two largest cities, Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Saint Paul is the second largest city in Minnesota, as well as the state capital. The area is part of a larger U.S. Census division named Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI, the country's 16th-largest metropolitan area, composed of eleven counties in Minnesota and two counties in Wisconsin. This larger area, in turn, is enveloped in the U.S. Census combined statistical area called Minneapolis -St. Paul -St. Cloud, MN -WI with an estimated population of 3.65 million people in 2019. In both of the fully developed central cities —Minneapolis and St. Paul —the population has declined due to smaller household sizes, yet growth in other areas of their counties has been more than offsetting. Below is detailed where this growth has occurred: POPULATION Census Census Forecast Growth Growth County 2000 2010 2022 2000 - 2010 2010-2022 total annual total annual Hennepin 1,116,200 1,152,425 1,260,121 3.25% 0.32% 9.35% 0.78% Ramsey 511,035 508,640 536,413 -0.47% -0.05% 5.46% 0.46% aD 3 Dakota 355,904 398,552 443,341 11.98% 1.20% 11.24% 0.94% m N Anoka 298,084 330,844 368,864 10.99% 1.10% 11.49% 0.95% 3 Washington 201,130 238,136 275,912 18.4% 1.84% 15.86% 1.32% ci Scott 89,498 129,928 154,520 45.17% 4.52% 18.93% 1.58% Wright 89,986 124,700 148,003 38.58% 3.86% 18.69% 1.56% L Carver 70,205 91,042 110,034 29.68% 2.97% 20.86% 1.74% '0 Sherburne 64,417 88,499 100,824 37.38% 3.74% 13.93% 1.16% N Chisago 41,101 53,887 57,988 31.11% 3.11% 7.61% 0.63% Total 2,837,560 3,116,653 3,456,020 1 9.84% 1 0.98% 10.89% 0.91% Overall, the area has experienced moderate to good income growth. Annualized income growth of 2.5% to 4.0% is consistent with national averages. MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME Census Estimate Growth County 2010 2022 2010-2022 total annual Hennepin 59,236 92,595 56.32% 4.69% L Ramsey 50,136 78,108 55.79% 4.65% m Dakota 69,508 101,360 45.82% 3.82% a Anoka 65,771 95,782 45.63% 3.80% v Washington 77,239 110,828 43.49% 3.62% Y) Scott 77,314 118,268 53.00% 4.41 % m u Wright 66,833 102,980 54.09% 4.51% c Carver 80,173 116,308 45.07% 3.76% Y) Sherburne 69,971 96,889 38.47% 3.21 % Chisago 63,810 97,446 52.71 % 4.39% Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 13 Regional Data — continued Economic Trends The current residential interest rates for a typical 30-year mortgage are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Commercial rates are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Rates are expected to increase to combat inflation. New construction labor costs have steadily increased along with material costs as well, however during the COVID-19 pandemic costs increased drastically due to supply chains not being able to meet demand. Overall, construction costs are at all-time highs. New construction of commercial, industrial, and multi -family is occurring, however, limited office new construction is occurring. Listing prices have been increasing steadily since 2012 +/- and are starting to approach peak levels similar to the market in 2006, which was a period of high seller expectations. However, recent buyer and seller expectations regarding value and list prices appear to be trending towards equilibrium. Although well diversified, the TCMA and surrounding Minnesota economy is not immune to the recent soft/declining trends of the overall economy. IN — I� 140 155 IN 125 in 115 1f0 Sry7016 PrlinnesotaIndex WNQ17 "np20fa SIPM9 Wawa Wp20r u.S_Index Sep-20 0n•20 U-20 p_20 b-21 H4l1 HYr•21 A9,21 IYF�-21 tun 11 2VLF1 Au6 21 s1p31 %ch w I— H nM A� Y.. Aa 0.2 9.9 solo 125.9 oft-20 123A 1 2a 12Aa O-20 120A 1-21 I25A F.b.0 MS Mr-21 12" Apr-21 12AS WW F1 1272 1�0 1un21 2129 LL21 12a•9 12y Au 21 129A S21 II9.9 120 115 Wl M AW 0.4 Yw Ago 5.8 110 SIMpa0f6 5"M7 S p201B Sep M Lp2020 Lp702' Source: Minnesota DEED The recent COVID-19 pandemic created a significant drop in the economy due to high unemployment and decreased spending in early 2020. However, spending has increased, employment is recovering, and the COVID-19 vaccines have given markets stability. Page 14 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued EMPLOYMENT & LABOR FRED — Unemployment Rate in Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI (MSA) — Unemployment Rate in Minnesota — Unemployment Rate 15.0 rw 100 m 7.5 a - 5.0 25 0.0 1950 1955 1950 1965 1970 1975 19W 1995 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Shaded areas indicate U_S_ recessions_ SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics fred-stlouisred org Over the past ten years, unemployment rates have gone from a peak of around 9.0% to near historical lows of around 2% in late 2018. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created a significant spike in the unemployment rate. The most recent data, shown below, indicates that the rate has dropped significantly and is approaching 2019 levels. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 15 Regional Data — continued APARTMENT MARKET Vacancy & Market Asking Rent Per Unit 8.0% F—.i 81.M 7.5% — — 91.ma 7.0% 'm.m 6.5% f1,60a S � 60% fl,ypp S EEE 5.5% E1,000 5.0% 51,300 1.5% E1,200 6.0% E1,100 13 1 ti 15 116 I 17 I 17 19 W 1 21 122 23 24 125 126 127 51,00a i �: Costar —, CoStar reports that rents have been trending upward consistently for the past 10+ years. The current average asking rate for an apartment unit in the Twin Cities Metro is around $1,398 per month. Vacancy has fluctuated, but was trending downward until 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a spike in vacancy, which has since been declining. However, vacancy is higher due to significant new construction, both in Minneapolis and surrounding suburbs. The following chart shows the annual absorption of apartment units: Absorption Units 7n W SK a1c 5 A � ax 1K 0 13 19 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2. 23 24 25 29 i� �-+��JI,CIly,,� GxN u,wena ■ W- tmarRup mrn�ton ln. Page 16 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued RETAIL MARKET 1"aearsyRa[e NetAAingRatc kandert-5t"i4n W Atk9orp(k- &S% 0 $19A per sq. it. 0 28,000 sq. % 213,771 sq. h. Fgue 1: 0ipea Vaoanty Rote and AhwprU 1,000,000 9 7 600,000 400,000 N0,400 4 0 tt� 2 I (400r00Q) 0 N� �Ahsarpriao—Villain Source! [BRE Rm arrh, Hl 2021_ CBRE indicates that current retail vacancy rates have been increasing and asking rent rates have been declining. There has been absorption of vacant space in the market, however, many developers are cautious about new retail construction. Strong locations retain typical demand; more speculative retail construction generally does not occur. Similarly, Cushman & Wakefield also shows stagnating retail asking rents and increasing vacancy: ■.14 2 h 9i1laT+7_l: To YM:?sad ssa 2019 2017 2619 2019 21020 � Asking ReM S PSF Dme:9 Vacarx.r Rate M 9% 4% Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 17 Regional Data — continued OFFICE MARKET CBRE data shows that asking rents for the overall office market have generally been increasing. This has also corresponded with an increase in vacancy rates as well. With the COVID-19 pandemic, many employers and workers realized that working remotely was a viable option. It is anticipated that many more companies will offer remote work full-time or part-time; this could impact office space as companies need less square footage. The counterpoint, however, is that companies might retain the same space and create social distancing opportunities in case of possible future COVID-19 flare-ups. FIGURE 3: Historical Vacancy Rates vs Asking Rakes Vacancy Rate 25% 20% 1546 1096 596 096 do Downtown Vacancy Avg Asking Rate (NNN) $1$SO $19.00 $1750 S17.00 $i6.50 $16_UO $15.50 $15_UO $m50 $14.00 oti � Suburban Vacancy - Downtown Asking Rate -Suburban Asking Rate Source CBRE R.eeLs I k 012023. FIGURE 6: Historical Downta m Vacancy W Class Vacancy Rate 35% 3crx 25% 10% 15% 1096 59G 0% —Class A —Class B —Class C 58udte: CBRE Ra aarfl. 01 202a FIGURE 5: Hiskarical Suburban Vacancy by Class Vacancy Rate 35% 30% 2.5% 20% 15% — 10% 5% 0% (�2vxq C', 2pp os.op 0,sco C�,. mad` G52 2.60 —Chas A —Class B —Claw C 56urCL-. CBRE F:06arCk 41 2D73 Page 18 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued INDUSTRIAL MARKET The industrial market nationwide has seen increases in rental rates and occupancy. Construction costs have been increasing as well, due to shortages created by the COVID-19 pandemic. In Minnesota the trend is similar to the country overall, vacancy has decreased, construction of new buildings is significant, CBRE indicates that vacancy has been dropping, construction starts have increased, and absorption is significant: RGURE 1: Quarterly and Annual Met Absorption vs_ Vacancy Net Absorption CMSF} 10 9 7 l 6 5 4 Vacancy 7% 6% 5% 4% 3 2 , � � LE0 = ,1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 11111111111111101 11111111111111102 11111111111111103 04 Vacancy Rate Source CBRE Research 012D23. Speculative development, per CBRE, has been significant. For example, almost 5,538,000 million square feet of speculative construction occurred in 2021/2021; of this, 9% has been leased. Buildings in 2022 are about 61 % leased. It appears the market is supporting speculative industrial development at this time. =IGURE I ❑eliveries, Absorpkion, and Availabi lity Rake #or Speculati4e Constructim SF (440'5) 30 35% 25 20 KI 25% 20% 15 1595 10 1Q90 4 096 _° ti° -P� ,�° -P ,9 NQ �° 16 TQ %Q 1° -° -P 'tip Spec E+Q i4eries 11111111111111SpetAbsorption SpecAvailahility Rate Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 19 Regional Data — continued Cushman & Wakefield also reports decreasing vacancy rates and significant increases in asking rates for industrial space. OVERALL VACANCY & ASKING RENT Avung R"I 3 P-Sr Vacan-M Rafe Total construction and absorption has been generally stable, but in 2021 there was significantly more absorption than construction. This would imply there is demand for more industrial space. ;SPACE DEMAND IDELI VERIES 2019 2019 202D M21 2022 Y M 2 D2 3 ■NaLAcm rplion, 5F ■CawftucWnCorplefrne. SF Page 20 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL MAP B E N T O N h OYeSt 23 °Braham West stab Stanchfield° Rush City °Trade Lake re Fo �rtell Springvale uk Rapids °VVyanett Harris P 0 L K C 95 Pnnc o Cambridge' Crwx °Luc ' 15 um— S A ° unnse Eureka l Spencer •Bradford Era h Center Milttow Brook Augusta S i E R B 11 R N E - Ba am Lake .Clearwater Orrock Centuria ylors is ✓1 Stac Center CityIts ■ dstromEast TAF Bethel y sa ity nia Dresser Wyomn 'VV RiuerGro e � °Osceola I s C O Nk 24 Amery Annandale Otsego O # Forest Lake East Ibertville Ramsey ° °AndO Scandia Rarmington r W R I G T er Maple Lake * Dayton. Albion Center a_ SY Michael uffalo Rogers Champlino�� Coon 14 prds a Oneka Lake Deer Star Prairie °Stanton forth ' laine° Centerville 'Hugo -ork C ow M I N N E 5 0 T 25 a Bt0 B 0ktyn Park. 8. Lake Park eF While Bear % ke Son rset Ric Cokato Corcoran Rockford Maple Grov rooklyn Hew - ShOrev ° peach w - ' e nd Waverly Sarah Eagle L ke 12 - 9a Mahtomedi Iwater Howard Lake Montrose H E N N E P N He op EY WASHINGTON• S T C R I x Delon Independence PtymOuttP $$ HOS ° G den Falc ° o h St Paul Oa Park Hei o V ley H s° Map 00 •Lake Elmo Hudson Roberts He and VIAnsted"k Waterto - Long Lake a eta _ apOHs Oakdale Lakelan v ak 1 (Spring Park. Minnetonka° 18g ° . LOui Park l Woodbury Silver Lake 7 Holl wo Minnetrista Deephaven Ho ins West Paul ° °Alton 1 Lester Prairie vrewood dine ° o o St Paul 18 O �ke Waconla �I r-� � r� end C • anhassen� den rairie ie 10 a •aver Falls aconia 5e Grove O D A R V E R 212 Bloc ington J/ y r Gro eights Dung Amerl 41 e . a agaR`� 77 Glencoe - a Igren ° Apple alley Hastin P I E R C E 212 Creek Hamburg 13 42 ° Rose mo Prior Lake Trimbe le Ells rth 25 282 Lakeville D A ~— T A Jordan arminglon 5 Helena 70 elle Plane a on Arling[o Cedar Lake Bay City B L E S C T ° Gaylord New Pragu astle Rock Red Henderson Webster 3 Lansdale Cannon Falls e Sueur G O O D ' .Lw on Wheatland 19 Northfield twC Kcharld E S ll E ll Montgomery R I C E Orer MemorialHs L L E T Le Cente E Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 21 CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Type of neighborhood: Outlying Suburban Northwestern Community Percent built-up: 90% developed (within city limits) Stage of Development: Stable with growth Neighborhood boundaries: City Limits Redevelopment Some new development and updating are occurring Major Transportation: Interstate 94, Highway 25 Single Family Residential 65% Two- & Multi -Family 10% Predominant type Commercial/Industrial 15% conformity: Other/Vacant/Public Land 10% Total: 100 % Typical property age: New to 75+ years, predominant under 30 years Single -Family Home Sales: $125,000 to $400,000+ Apartment Sales: $40,000 to $80,000+ per unit Office Property Sales: $75 to $125+ per SF Retail Property Sales: $100 to $200+ per SF Industrial Property Sales: $40 to $80+ per SF Capitalization Rates: 7-10% Historic Subject Market: Stable, some growth Neighborhood Trend: Stable, some growth Detrimental influences: No major apparent Area / City: Monticello is located about 45 minutes northwest of Downtown Minneapolis and 40 minutes southeast of St. Cloud. Access to Interstate 94 is conveniently located near the subject parcel. Interstate 94 provides direct access to the Twin Cities Metro Area, St. Cloud, and surrounding communities. Monticello has a reputation as a stable community, with nearby shopping and access to many major roadways. Access to Downtown and surrounding communities is considered average. Major shopping and commerce are located within the City of Monticello. Neighborhood: The subject is located along the Interstate 94 corridor at the intersection of Interstate 94 and Highway 25. Surrounding uses include commercial, apartments, and future development land. Page 22 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 City & Neighborhood Description — continued Subject City: As of the 2010 census the population was 12,759, in 2000 it was 7,868. This represents a net increase of 62.2% from 2000 to 2010. The 2020 population for the city is 14,455, an increase of 13.3% from 2010. The 2022 population estimate for the city is 14,804, or about an increase of 2.4% from 2020. Median Income 2019 to 2022 $120,000 $100, 000 $80, 000 $60,000 — $40,000 $20, 000 — $0 2019 202D 2021 2022 ■ Minnesota ■ Wright County Monticello The median income for the city is below county levels and state levels (per Census Bureau). Income has increased in recent years. Median Home Prices: Citv of Monticello Source: NorthstarMLS Stats Median Sales Price Twin Cities Region — Monticello $450K $400K $350K $300K $250K $200i 1.2019 7-2020 1-2027 1-2022 1-2023 7.2024 Twin Cities Region & Monticello: Single -Family Each data pmM is 12 months of act A y Dad rsfmm February 3, M24. All dad from NonhstarMLS. Data deemed reliable but not guaranosd. l nl S9ar,,82024 Shmi,gTime_ The median household income for the city is below the Twin Cities Metro. The median home price started to plateau since the start of 2022; this is likely attributed to increasing interest rates. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 23 NEIGHBORHOOD MAP Subject Page 24 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SURRO�NpING ® to subs a`te the imea di NYNO vAkersta to the 000- \�rllorp°(all \ BEFORE ANALYSIS Page 26 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SITE DESCRIPTION Dimensions: Gross Site Area: Net Site Area: Topography / Low Area Shape: Soil conditions: Drainage: Utilities: Electricity / Gas: Water / Sanitary Sewer: Off -Site Improvements: Street/Cu rb-g utter: Sidewalk: Visual Road Condition: Street Lights / Alley: Storm Sewer: Access to site (#) / Frontage Traffic Count: Visibility: Flood hazard zone Apparent Easements: Encroachments: Unusual Conditions: Use: Land to Building ratio Excess/Surplus Land: Functional Adequacy: Surrounding Uses: Distance to Major Road Somewhat rectangular 279,220 SF (6.41 acres), per county, confirmed with aerial GIS measure 279,220 SF (6.41 acres) Mostly level / None noted Somewhat rectangular Assumed to be stable Appears adequate Yes / Yes Public water / Public sanitary sewer Asphalt / Concrete Concrete Dated Standard / None Yes 7th Street West (2), Interstate 94 entrance ramp (no direct access) The MnDOT traffic count map indicates 6,061 vehicles per day (in 2022) along 7th Street West and 48,369 vehicles per day (in 2022) along Interstate 94 Average The structure does not appear to be in the flood zone, see following map Typical utility and drainage assumed, there appear to be shared access easements with adjoining properties (assumed typical of the market) None apparent, no survey provided None noted Commercial n/a None noted Functional site N Commercial, apartments E Commercial S Interstate 94 W Commercial About 1 block east to Highway 25, about 0.15 miles south to 1-94 access The subject is located in the northwestern corner of the intersection of Highway 25 and Interstate 94. The surrounding uses include office, commercial, apartments, and the library. The subject site has average development appeal. The existing retaining wall along 7th Street West is failing; if not repaired, the subject parking lot could be impacted. No apparent adverse influences or easements noted or reported. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 27 ZONING MAP The subject is zoned CCD, Central Community District Legend Business Districts BASE ZONING DISTRICTS B-1 B 2 Residential Districts - B-3 -won Residential Densities - B-4 J A-O R-A GOD' , R-1 i Industrial DIsVlcts - Medium Resdental Densitas CIBc T-N 1.1 R-2 1.2 R-PUD [}p3 ADordanm Storage -High Residential Densties [MJ Al—n Ridge Villas - _ R-3 L�4J' Rivedown Suites _ R-4 [JDJ MinMlcello RV - [Jj] Desphaven -M-H L_T_1JT in Pines [MJ IIMc OTHER CM:j Ed—... Ritlge O Water CMj Nt— Truck end Equipment Addnioi PUD Districts r Slo,age linkMonicello 9E- [1Y7 smnv Brook Village [IQJS7River LjH_IMonticelloLakes C_M MoMdellu High School []]:)Hoglund Bus Park L33J Mills Fleet Farm E,20 Block 52 :M:j Red Roesler L'a:IC..," .ic Manor 2.d Adddw. _ spaeth Industrial Park L22-111aven Ridge ]nd Addition [SlEJ Camping M dtl Lam. ]Great River OVERLAY DISTRICTS _ spacial Use Overlay District t _ 1 Mississippi Mid, scenic & Red Overlay District - Moreland DlstdcP' J Freeway Bonus Sign District Floodplaln" Page 28 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ZONING Subject Zoning: CCD, Central Community District The purposes of the CCD, Central Community District, is to provide for a wide variety of land uses, transportation options, and public activities in the downtown Monticello area, and particularly to implement the goals, objectives, and specific directives of the Comprehensive Plan, and in particular, the 2017 Downtown Monticello "Small Area Plan" comprehensive Plan amendment and its design and performance standards. All proposed development or redevelopment in the CCD shall be Intent (city code): subject to the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and other standards identified in the Small Area Plan report. It is not the intent of this chapter to abrogate any general Zoning Ordinance requirements in the CCD, and all such requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance apply fully within the CCD unless addressed separately by a more detailed CCD zoning regulation. Projects that benefit from public investments and/or subsidies will have a greater burden to provide higher levels of both private and public amenities. Multi 3 du or under; townhouse; ground floor; commercial day care; Permitted Uses: professional office -services and retail; commercial office; financial; retail < 10,000 SF; retail with service; clinics/medical services; Single-family; multi 4-12 du; multi 13+ du; event centers; funeral Conditional Uses/Special services; personal services; places of public assembly; restaurants, Permit: bars <10,000 SF; restaurants, bars > 10,000 SF; retail sales > 10,000 SF; specialty eating establishments < 10,000 SF; veterinary facilities < 10,000 SF; public buildings or uses (incl. public parks); Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 29 Zoning — Continued Parking: Retail commercial uses in general: 1.0 space for each 200 SF, if in the CCD district, 1 space per 350 SF of floor space Minimum lot size: No minimum Maximum lot coverage: 40% (one story building) Major Restriction/ Minimum lot width: No minimum requirements in this district: Front vard setback: 8 feet Side vard setback: 0 feet Rear vard setback: 0 to 8 feet Maximum buildinq heiqht: 50 feet Use: The existing use appears to be allowed and permitted; if found otherwise, the value could differ. Source: Zoning map, city code Page 30 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 FUTURE LAND USE MAP 1 nilf'102 11.E The subject is guided for RC, Regional Commercial City of Monticello Boundary 0 Mixed Neighborhood (MN) L......... Monticello Orderly Annexation Area (MCAA) Mixed -Density Residential (MDR) 0 Parcels 0 Manufactured Home (MH) Streets 0 Downtown Mixed -Use (DMU) Railroad Community Commercial (CC) Water Bodies Regional Commercial (RC) t 0 Development Reserve (DR) 0 Commercial and Residential Flex (CRF) 0 Open Space and Resource Conservation (OSRC) Employment Campus (EC) City Parks and Recreation (PR) 0 Light Industrial Park (LIP) 0 Estate Residential (ER) General Industrial (GI) 0 Low -Density Residential (LDR) 0 Public and Institutional (P) 0 Traditional Residential (TR) 0 Xcel Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 31 Future Land Use Map — Continued The RC, Regional Commercial designation is described as the following in the city's comprehensive plan: ReWonaf Corrrmercil A Regional Commercial designation applies to areas targeted for uses that serve the traveling public and larger retail uses and commercial development intended for a regional market. This designation is generally applied to various areas along the Interstate 94 corridor with high visibility. The development character of the regional commercial development will continue to be auto -oriented, large format commercial uses such as 'big -box' uses and other uses that require a large parking area. Looking to the future, opportunities for connectivity and design linkages between such development and nearby uses and neighborhoods will be emphasized. The comprehensive plan also provides additional district characteristics for Regional Commercial: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) The Regional Commercial designation includes large-scale commercial uses serving a regional market, typically on large sites along the Interstate or major arterials madwayssuch as State Highway 2S. Retail uses within this category usually have large floor areas and high sales volumes and may he considered shopping "destinations" by consumers from the region. Uses such as furniture and electronic stores, farm supply, home improvement stores, department stores, "big box" retailers, hotels and restaurants are included. Smaller and more local -serving retail uses, and personal seances are generally not appropriate but could be allowed if complementary to a regional use. Commercial "Big Box" Stores Department Stores Hotels Restaurants Recreational Plaza Public Space Comprehensive Plan Conclusion: Primary Mode Vehicular with access to collectors and arterials Transit or shuttle service I Secondary Made shared bike/ pedestrian facilities Floor Area Ratio 2018 Correlating (FART Zoning District 0.30 to 0.50 B-3 Height- Highway 1-2 stories, 4 stories Business District for inor office B-4 Lot Area - Regional NIA Business District The subject is guided for a commercial use, which is consistent with the current zoning. Page 32 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 a ..r Ll e\\o P\.,X)\ Nogp E eZagr,I\c \� " ,y;ts ST Cots .Rd { rt 9."o 4�47h'�#;.WAX n \ .10 P:4o s \ Jr Ak IA `a is teas, AERIAL / PLAT MAP 17, I� , 7 .��r �',huluU UGU4II �5!, ntisniOno, ;r T.STi7 771 M '{ 5 7 r t10 1.13 10'J.0 The red outline reflects the subject gross site area, per county. Page 34 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 gA8 WEt�-p`NO MA? eot �s \ra�Gate d by f ' ,iVA oN webs\ke \he sub\ d map thathe Vert t\ar {or a\ yet\ands \n Ceary a vesouroe at�o ° pv�K n r \t \s a p \s a 9° ,F ap \s {ro�'�o we \and areas et\aod F\nde�d F\nde� t\a wet\ard m ere afe O\ e W\ \Ne {he abol \t appears th s {rom the \ �" ard, th N red a aboNje eXhbd �deCxoeat\on. Note. 0 \G\a\ I d researoh. beg�on\ng o{ w Page 36 SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Looking west on 7t" Street West Looking east on 7t" Street West View of building improvements (not appraised) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Site view Page 37 HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and best use is defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition as, "The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria that the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity". Highest and best use is analyzed in two ways, site as vacant and site as improved. Typically, there are four criteria in highest and best use analysis Legally permissible uses What uses are allowed by zoning? Physically possible uses What uses are physically possible on the site? Financially feasible use Which possible and permissible uses will produce a positive return? Maximally productive use Of the financially feasible uses, which use produces the highest return warranted by the market (the ideal improvements)? Site as Vacant: The use of the real estate based on the presumption that the parcel of land is vacant or can be made vacant by demolishing any improvements (i.e., as vacant or as if vacant). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 151' Edition, page 307) Legally Permissible Uses: The current CCD, Central Community District zoning allows primarily for a variety of commercial, office, and some residential uses. The subject is guided for RC, Regional Commercial which appears to be similar to the existing zoning. Physically Possible Uses: The subject site is somewhat rectangular, with a rectangular building pad area. Visibility and access to the property are rated average. The physical characteristics of the site appear suitable for development. The property has electricity, gas, public water, and public sanitary sewer available. Access to Interstate 94 is nearby, which is also appealing. The subject site has some visibility to 1-94. Financially Feasible Uses: Typically, surrounding uses, market demand, and availability of financing drive financially feasible uses. Surrounding Uses: Uses in the immediate area are commercial, apartments, and public. A commercial use would be supported. Financing: Current interest rates range from 7.50% to 8.50%+. Borrowers typically must be well qualified with 20% to 30% down. Financing for owner occupied properties (residential, commercial, industrial, and business) is rated to be average to good. Financing for multi -tenant commercial or office is rated to be average, however, most projects must be substantially pre - leased before lenders will extend financing. Market Demand: Market demand for commercial land in the subject area is soft to average. Any new construction would likely result in tenants/occupants that serve the immediate city or neighborhood. There is available development land within the city for new construction, including to the west of the subject. The subject is within commuting distance of the Metro area and attracts residential users (who require commercial services). Financially Feasible Uses: A commercial use is logical on the site. Given the location and overall size of the subject, development timing is likely 2+ years. Page 38 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Highest and Best Use — Continued Maximally Productive Use: The highest and best use as vacant is considered to be for a commercial building as market demand warrants and zoning allows. New construction generally results in average to good quality buildings. Based on the site size, the market would likely indicate a building of 55,000 SF to 80,000 SF Most Probable Buyer: Developer who would construct a single- or multi -occupant commercial building. Valuation Methodology: Commercial land sales will be considered to value the subject. Site as Improved: The use that should be made of the real estate as it exists (i.e., as currently improved or as if improved as proposed). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 307) The subject is improved with a multi -tenant commercial building. This is similar to the highest and best use, as -if vacant. Given the scope of the assignment and acquisition area, this analysis is not applicable. However, a continued commercial use is logical. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 39 C�Z��+ • ... �ZT�1 The subject is being appraised as vacant land; therefore, the Cost Approach is not considered applicable and was not applied. INCOME APPROACH The Income Approach was not applied as rental and capitalization rate data for land like the subject is limited, which renders the approach unreliable. Page 40 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SALES COMPARISON APPROACH In the sales comparison approach, an opinion of market value is developed by comparing properties similar to the subject property that have recently sold, are listed for sale, or are under contract (i.e., for which purchase offers and a deposit have been recently submitted). A major premise of the sales comparison approach is that an opinion of the market value of a property can be supported by studying the market's reaction to comparable and competitive properties. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 351) Supply and Demand: Property prices result from negotiations between buyers and sellers. In a market with many buyers and sellers, buyers make up the market demand the properties offered for sale or lease currently or in the foreseeable future make up the supply. To estimate demand, appraisers consider the number of potential users of a particular type of property, their purchasing power, and their tastes and preferences. To analyze supply, appraisers focus on existing properties that are available on the market as well as properties that are being constructed, converted, or planned. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Substitution: The principle of substation holds that the value of property tends to be set by the cost of acquiring a substitute or alternative property of similar utility and desirability within a reasonable amount of time. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Balance: The forces of supply and demand tend toward equilibrium, or balance, in the market, but absolute equilibrium is almost never attained. Due to shifts in population, purchasing power, consumer tastes and preferences, and many other factors, demand varies greatly over time. The construction of new buildings, conversion of existing buildings to other uses, and demolition of old buildings cause supply to vary as well. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Externalities: External forces affect all types of property in positive or negative ways. Periods of economic growth and economic decline influence property values. Appraisers analyze the market area of the subject property to identify all significant external influences. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 151h Edition, page 353) When possible, select comparables with similar location, economic conditions and support facilities. Land Value: "Sales comparison is usually the preferred method for developing an opinion of site value. When this method is used, most of the techniques for selecting comparable sales and making adjustments that are described in Chapter 20 can be applied to site valuation. When there are not enough sales of similar parcels for the application of sales comparison, alternative methods such as market extraction, allocation, land residual analysis, and various income capitalization techniques may be used". (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 151h Edition, page 339) The Following Outline Is Used In The Sales Comparison Approach: - A location map of the comparable sales. - Comparable sales are listed. - An adjustment grid using the comparable sales. - A discussion of adjustment and conclusion of value. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 41 Comparable Location Map Primary Comparable Selection/Search Criteria: • Primary emphasis on commercial and apartment (possibly allowed by zoning) land sales • Sale date of January 1, 2020 +, older sales may be considered • 50,000 SF to 500,000 SF + • Data from competing communities • In some instances, older data and/or data from competing communities will be utilized due to proximity to the subject and other characteristics similar to the subject. Tot Lot Becker 24 10 w ralliunil 'l 5 E R B U R N E 5 4 5 a Mrs Q p a 1 •* tiq Land Sale 4 rgicello 39 Land Sale I Land Sale 5 JP y rr 37 A PulasW � Lake 1 Lanae d Sl2 ~ Meadows Pa � / t J M I N N E S O T _ BiO Lake 77 d C*ehus Me orial o ^eY Batley d 13 s rpl sA p a � 0 Riv s E e Elk Piper Com on rkr-, ■ a ,� o Otsego [ ISle- 101 Point I- r 9 42 Towne r Lakes { Park p " rips ti Land Sale 3 a Alb f r 30 Sh ow 241 � W d Park St. Michael - t3 194 erring Mill ■ 19 Crow -Hassan � y 35 County Park Syluan Rog s ae y Page 42 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sale Comparison Approach — Continued Sale Comparable 1 Aerial Image Address: XXXX Deegan Avenue, Monticello The land sale is indicated by the red arrow. Surrounding uses include a movie theater, Walmart, and other commercial. In the greater area is future development land and single-family residential. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 43 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Propertv Data Address: PID/Legal Description Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #1 1 XXXX Deegan Avenue, Monticello 155-176-001020 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 117,612 SF Improvements: None Slightly smaller commercial land parcel located along Highway 25. The property is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. Access to the site is via a backage road (no direct access to Highway 25). $930,440 July 21, 2021 Daniel Thomas Robbins City of Monticello Price /Acre Sale Terms Sale Conditions: Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $7.91 per SF Cash Typical RediComps, CoStar / CREV Page 44 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 195011" Me w' 1981h pve Nw i° 5� ti 9�i Ave NWV` 11-S- Bank Branch ti It �if ShopY�IALDi r3 Nye; qoTheNDhle.4ullier '4 Wilt shpp q I r". r 1 w Ori -Academy r —10 t r OI z 0 pye NW'1198th'�+'e May t r no" ' N _ Elk River m oavidso'fdea_�Q 7tam ,0b, 9.. a Sy�2y� i 6jh 44 MW 196th lrr Nw + M + Culver's VA—fl— • 5 R' �2 �aVP, f 7. - 4 3a .79S1h4��k' -- 2�- M1g5_,hpVe�w r �+ Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #2 Propertv Data Address: 19645 Evans Street Northwest, Elk River PID/Legal Description: 75-00769-0105 Description: Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Physical Characteristics: Average Utilities: Public Site Size: 172,497 SF Improvements: None Mostly rectangular parcel of land that has average development appeal. The eastern and Comments: northern portions of the site are wooded. The property has less visibility as compared to the subject. Sale Data Sale Price: $837,048 Price /Acre: $4.85 per SF Sale/Close Date: July 15, 2022 Sale Terms: Cash Buyer: Kostreba Holdings LLC Sale Conditions: Typical Seller: Comments: Zylstra Properties LLC Source/Verification: RediComps / CREV The property was listed on the open market. Page 46 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 cam �TamisDaycar&, . *. Kali Ave NEf 16I �« �az z r >y � >v a � x n s Iz - z •� i4+ ' w I NE 53rd SINE �m r ° 53rdSt NE •: .4 •�r� The Goddard`Sehac _ 5 of �Ihertvilfe • R1 � rI'" ,r � � x : r z 1 Al , aj m IPei Nation Veterinary • Care Cenfe r 3 x ro &Thel-io•:; S7S7r C a • 5_mnyoays T'ierap�,•-� � e Orihc:ic Pa-kmay To:o:iy Service z rt0 Powers We :`51ti�GaC"L. L�.`. � .� pint Po Jason Ave NE 50Ih St NE r Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Property Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #3 9 Four Seasons Park 5292 Kyler Avenue Northeast, Albertville 101137001010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 61,463 SF Improvements: None Smaller commercial land parcel located along County Road 19 (Labeaux Avenue Northeast). The property is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. Access to the site is via a backage road (no direct access to County Road 19). $449,000 January 12, 2024 Ortiz Properties LLC Price /Acre Sale Terms Sale Conditions: Cheney Properties, LLC Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $7.31 per SF Financing Typical RediComps, MLS / CREV Page 48 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sale Comparison Approach — Continued mane I' sale is indicated by Mu ' ,v ricultur6i IW The land and a9 le-fam►ly residential, townhom es sing I, The site is located along Highway 10. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 49 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #4 B'ao'rs y Land Sale 4 10 wns Park erLake gig Lake M ossn Par I Property Data Address: 90 Lakeshore Drive, Big Lake 65-124-4105 PID/Legal Description: Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Description: Average Utilities: Public Physical Characteristics: 69,696 SF Improvements: None Site Size: Smaller commercial site that has average development appeal. The property was purchased Comments: for the development of a Dollar General. The site has frontage and visibility along Highway 10. Sale Data Sale Price: $360,000 Price /Acre: $5.17 per SF Sale/Close Date: December 8, 2023 Sale Terms: Financing Buyer: DGCOGBIGLAKEMN06142023 Sale Conditions: Typical LL Seller: Medved & Nelson Source/Verification: RediComps, MLS / CREV Comments: The property was listed on the open market. Page 50 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 eep to WCCA WI i c ,r ' - Transmission'&•R - Due North Car ' Jensen Precision ~ Machi 'i ' 1Niha Tool's ! Martie's Farm Services UYendas�Rd - -- I `c a. ALDI ucai ALD • Great C n. B ffalcWildl"linos •� �BC•GD F.�ez EVG,L�i�0;I Iae K.W DI. • -� `CjG h1Dnt;CNIO Wal, ,art Sapercenter 16. ct Oslund Seamless. Gutters LLC' a `Le9 Cr ; Kjellberg Ct -Ne'li erg P-er SERof : ' rw}Inn— tive� V P[O s Wright County Theln�Well` Au oluti❑ } 3 Harrod Palnti'e 7 f Dent RI i,:� ��Eagle Ridge Ln I J nstea6QT L . m a° w, l C H OFs • y • U ® SctoolOvid Sc1aclBlvd ` sChocl al';8 �. I Pe661ebrcckBr p ym Works' • Q ' Cry z di QM `arClr �' clt¢ Diamond Or. Ccl;CleS, .. �'ti Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Propertv Data Address: PID/Legal Description Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #5 14 XXXX Edmonson Avenue Northeast, Monticello 155-269-001010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Apartments Average Utilities: Public 467,398 SF Improvements: None Larger development land site that was zoned for a PUD use. The buyer purchased to develop apartments. The subject's existing zoning would allow for some apartments; this sale captures the apartment potential. $2,100,000 March 20, 2023 Price /Acre Sale Terms Monticello Lakes, LLC Sale Conditions: Monticello Lake Apartments, LLC Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $4.49 per SF Cash Typical RediComps / CREV Page 52 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 r ~� ti - I • ice ` Ryar: Au'+-c Mall n� Chrvsler•i]odge Jeep.., V fvlacn Mot • sports "olorcyce.dezler a R a e; Me,,, ► �� _IpleH ! fir CA 9L. 7qa Zf �r y- �I I►� ifpt s q\ �'tt�►til� alarm; ' Gr'e� cis ��t��, ►4S Rd.; Ih: r►y` Oil �. �. •' /1 Open Road R, L! 1/• �Ra� tl�a e r Iy Pd4 _ boy. � , •r �// � �. � ParkPfDr_ o. L5 '0 � .. WestonD� T ' 0 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Propertv Data Address: PID/Legal Description Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #6 3810 Chelsea Road West, Monticello 155-253-000010, 155-125-000040 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 251,225 SF Improvements: None Commercial land that is similar in size to the subject property. The site has less visibility as compared to the subject; the location is rated to be inferior. The property was purchased for the development of a mini -storage. $940,869 August 26, 2021 StorageLink of St. Cloud Hwy 15, LLC Ocello, LLC Price /Acre Sale Terms Sale Conditions: Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $3.75 per SF Financing Typical RediComps / CREV Page 54 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Listed below is the adjustment grid for the comparables listed on the previous pages. Comparable items of significant difference are adjusted for. Description Subject 1 2 3 4 5 6 206 )000( 19645 5292 90 X00( 3810 Address 7th Street West Deegan Avenue Evans Street NW Kyler Avenue NE Lakeshore Drive Edmonson Ave NE Cheslea Road W Monticello Monticello Elk River Albertville Big Lake Monticello Monticello Proximity Subject 1.04 mi S 11.8 mi NE 8.31 mi SE 3.03 mi NE 1 mi S 0.63 mi SW (Financing Market Cash Cash Financing Financing Cash Financing (Conditions Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Market Conditions -- Jul-21 Jul-22 Jan-24 Dec-23 Mar-23 Aug-21 (Location Average Average Less Visible Average Fair/Average Fair/Average Fair (Zoning/Use Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Apartments Commercial Phys Char Average Average Average Average Average Average Average (Improvements n/a None None None None None None Size Age Condition Utilities Public Public Public Public Public Public Public (Sale Price -- $930,440 $837,048 $449,000 $360,000 $2,100,000 $940,869 Site Size (SF) 279,220 117,612 172,497 61,463 69,696 467,398 251,225 Price per SF - Site Size $7.91 $4.85 $7.31 $5.17 $4.49 $3.75 Cond. Adj. +/- (Financing Market (Conditions Typical Market Conditions 5.06% 3.09°% 0.11 % 0.30 % 1.73 % 4.87°% Net Cond. Adj. 5.06% 3.09% 0.11% 0.30% 1.73% 4.87% Effective $/SF - Site Size $8.31 $5.00 $7.31 $5.18 $4.57 $3.93 Adjustments +/- (Location Average 10°% 10°% 10% 20°% (Zoning/Use Commercial IPhys Char Average (Improvements n/a (Utilities Public Site Size (SF) 279,220 -10% -10% Net Adjustment 0% 10% -10% 0% 10% 20% Adjusted Price per SF - Site Size $8.31 $5.50 $6.58 $5.18 $5.03 $4.71 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 55 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Discussion of Adjustments Property Rights: Refers to the ownership interest conveyed at the time of sale. Properties with leases or other encumbrances in place can sell for more or less than comparable properties that sell fee simple interest. • All transactions were fee simple, no adjustment warranted. Financing: The impact financing may have had on the sale price, favorable interest rate or term. • All sales were cash or estimated to be near or at market rates. Conditions of sale: Reflects non -market conditions, which may or may not have impacted the sale price, such as differing motivations of buyer or seller (related parties, distressed or liquidation sale, listings, pending, occupancy, assemblage, etc.), impending eminent domain proceedings, influence due to tax ramifications, or lack of market exposure. • All transactions appear to be typical transactions, no adjustment warranted. Market Conditions: Based on a variety of data, the appraiser concludes to an annual appreciation rate of 2%. This rate is applied accordingly to the sales comparables. Location: This adjustment is based on the appraiser's judgment. It takes into consideration surrounding land uses, intended use, neighborhood characteristics, traffic, exposure and access. • Comparable 1 adjusted for less visibility. • Comparable 4 adjusted for less surrounding commercial development. • Comparable 5 adjusted for less surrounding commercial development. • Comparable 6 adjusted for less visibility and overall inferior location. Zoning/Use: • The comparables are rated similar to the subject, no adjustment. Physical Characteristics: Shape and topography adjustments reflect the market preference for mostly rectangular and level parcels, which optimize development potential. • The comparables are rated similar to the subject, no adjustment. Page 56 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Improvements: The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Utilities: • The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Site Size: Adjustments recognize larger parcels of land typically sell for less per SF than smaller sites. Comparables adjusted accordingly. • The adjustment is based on discussions with market participants as well as previously observed sales. Conclusion: The comparables used are rated to be the most indicative of data analyzed and bracket the subject value. Other sales reviewed were older, further and/or needed more adjustment. Adjustments are made on a per SF basis. The comparables utilized in this analysis each have several similar characteristics in common with the subject. While none are totally identical to the subject, each represents a viable alternative to a prospective buyer of the subject property and, after adjustment, can be utilized as an indicator of market value for the subject property. Indicator Un-adiusted Price per SF Range $3.75 - $7.91 Average $5.58 Median $5.01 Adiusted Price per SF $4.71 - $8.31 $5.89 $5.34 Primary emphasis is given to Sales 1, 5, and 6 which are located in Monticello. These sales have an adjusted average price per SF of $6.02. Considering the above data, the subject location, characteristics, quality, and the current market conditions, a value near the upper range is considered appropriate. Site Size (SF) Value per SF Total 279,220 $7.25 $2,024,345 Indicated Value (land only) $2,025,000 (rnd.) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 57 RECONCILIATION Cost Approach Not Applied Sales Comparison Approach $2,025,000 Income Approach Not Applied The Cost Approach to value was not applied as the subject is being appraised as vacant land. The Direct Sales Comparison Approach to value analyzed recent sales of properties as compared with the characteristics of the subject property. Adjustments were made to the comparables to make them as similar to the subject as possible. This results in an indication of market value at which a typical buyer would be willing to pay for the subject property. Quality and quantity of data rated to be average. The Income Approach was not utilized due to limited rents and capitalization rates of properties similar to the subject. Conclusion: The Sales Comparison Approach is given the most weight. Data quantity and quality was rated to be average. Final Value Opinion (BEFORE) The value opinion is: $2,025,000 EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME Reasonable Exposure Time: Typically 6 to 12 months Marketing Time Opinion: 6 to 12 months +/- after the before the effective date of the appraisal. effective date of the appraisal. Page 58 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 AFTER ANALYSIS The neighborhood, site, regional, aerial, comparables, etc. descriptions are the same in the before as the after (unless otherwise noted on the following pages). The highest and best use of the site as vacant is for commercial development as market demand warrants and zoning allows. The highest and best use of the site as improved is not applicable. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 59 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Monticello is proposing to replace a failing retaining wall along 7t" Street West. The retaining wall is used to support adjoining parking lots and allow for a concrete sidewalk. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring temporary easements. Description of the acquisition areas and types: Right-of-Wav Acquisition (ROW): Used for right of way related purposes (road construction, ponding, etc.). The city will acquire this area in fee; the property owner does not retain any ownership rights. The city reported the following ROW for the project. Site Size — Before 279,220 SF Acquisition Area — ROW 0 SF Site Size - After 279,220 SF Permanent Easement: The easement area is used for trail, drainage, and utility purposes. The subject owner remains the underlying owner of the area. The city reports the following for permanent easement area: Total Permanent Easement None Temporary Easement: Used for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. A market rate of return will be found for the time period that the temporary easement exists. Because the owner retains ownership of the temporary easement area, it is not applicable to subtract it as a loss from the "Before" site size. For the specific subject parcel, it appears that the sloping after the project will be similar to the sloping before the project with minimal changes. However, because changes can occur during actual construction, the appraiser reserves the right to reconsider damages if the slope exceeds 1 to 4 in the after condition. The temporary easement length is anticipated to last 18 months. Temporary Easement 9,791 SF Page 60 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SKETCH OF ACQUISITION Temporary Easement Exhibit PROP°SE° TEMPORARY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION' A f<mporwy earmt for fiucflon purposes ova mtl oc nss th< Narih 4C.W Net M Ntlot 4. MO.Tl—O M41y, NHght Cwnty, Mheesoto. and Duet snA ocrasa ihoi p.rt of Lot 1. Blxn I, mId MONMELLA MAu -hleh Ilea N.Oherl, korMegeteNy and NMhwe My of the following d.dbed the and r (/} � ire mte abna� r gl omd got sold Igne drarn partlle.ft did— 4pO <e Swth the Northt Ilne of 0utlot AI thence Eoeteviy, pamliei vim egid Noah the of ouaof n o a R. Eoew erten Non, a di. of 52, 57 4<t: then<e 5outhearlaty cndIlk— . _ - _ _ of 11 ].9] feet along o tongenriel curve ve to Me Swt heest. hoving a radius of 250.00 }set ena a cent' aagreea Sn minutes 51 \ seceede; Mace 5<pinsosteay, le�gmt 1p sold losF a�scabeb curve, n t I w1d I - - \ 42.112 I.etf ra6lne nle:ae tlm :th�il°. eN ulrAantM tune c} sand Lct No end - \ w�a nee me.. termee q 7rNA\ \ rea of Pmposea temp ry Eoeement . N.TNI eq azz ae,sa "- north iAe et ,-oaNel A. \ MON11Cn10 MALL Ak I \II \f \IVIn1 '414 �V 52.57 f�-40.00 12W. fret of Ntlet A. s2• vVTi VT .r MONICnLO MALL and its fI Eaaietiv �- ..,k \ i V ti e.ttnaon Aa \ r r'��"/ —I s n Ann ITI(�r I n � IViIJI v IUL_L_L_ll o \ f� A I11�ITIrIN,41 1—rUUI I ILJI \ t � P eeF biroaEu'I i�lu N1 �y E It V I r1 L _ L Im�•��"""��" Hakansan Berson Easement Exhlblt 61%sd' �2� CITY or M rnor;TlcELLo The new temporary easement area is shown in the cross -hatched area. The city indicates the temporary easement is 9,791 SF. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 61 Sketch of Acquisition — continued .JI —7Tn sr w. 5068080626 - � - I. T 155068001020 M FN WI, 9AW y 15501DOU 40 — " '�15�o1,uauzois— 155 760 , 1 _ J The red outline above reflects the subject property. The dashed yellow outline reflects the approximate temporary easement area. Page 62 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA Temporary Easement Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Temporary Easement Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 63 Photographs of Acquisition Area — Continued Temporary Easement Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Temporary Easement Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Page 64 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE Potential aspects of damage or loss in value to the subject property caused by the partial acquisition: Land within the acquired area Buildings located within the acquired area Site improvements within the acquired area Severance damage, the influence of the acquisition area on the subject property Project Influence Land - Land value breakdown -- On the basis that all portions of the subject site have equal value contribution the subject's land value in the taking area is diminished by the pro -rated value of the land acquired. Buildings — There are no building improvements in the acquisition area. Site improvements — Based on an inspection, see below chart for site improvements, if any, that are impacted by the acquisition. The city will move and/or replace in kind any wells, septic systems, underground watering systems, and fences as needed. Site Improvements Description Type/Size/Condition Quantity/Rate Total Opinion of Market Value Trees None $0 Plantings None $0 Other None $0 It is assumed the city will replace any asphalt or Driveway/Fence concrete in like manner; if found otherwise, the $0 appraised value could differ Underground Watering System None $0 Sign None $0 TOTAL $0 Note: The city is to maintain access to the subject during the project period. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 65 Aspects of Potential Damage — continued Severance damage — Given the current site layout and use, there is no severance damage to the remainder as a result of the acquisition. It is the appraiser's opinion the proposed acquisition as described in this report will not have an adverse effect on the marketability or value of the remainder due to the acquisition. See chart below. Site Characteristics Location Access Street Improvements Trail Ponding Utilities Elevation Drainage Retaining Wall Primary Factors Considered for Estimating Potential Severance Before After Average Average Average Average Dated Dated None None Sound Wall Fence House/Building Proximity to Road/ROW, approximate Net Impact Nil Nil Nil Nil None None Nil Public Public Nil Average Average Nil Average Average Nil Fair, failing New Benefit not considered None None Nil None None Nil n/a n/a Nil Site / Development Appeal Average Average Nil Highest and Best Use Commercial Commercial Nil *Appraised value does not give consideration to any benefit to the subject as result of the proposed project. Severance Discussion: Based on the above chart analysis, there is no severance damage to the remainder. The highest and best use of the subject in the before and the after is considered to be the same. Project Influence - The subject will have reasonable and suitable access throughout the project. The proposed project is considered typical. An informed buyer/property owner is aware that any property is subject to occasional disturbances due to various projects over the course of time; such as road upgrades, utility improvements, other infrastructure maintenance, construction/razing of buildings, renovations to the noted property, etc. Note: The temporary easement area will encumber 21 parking stalls. Based on aerial images and viewing the site multiple times, the encumbered parking stalls are generally vacant (they are approximately 276' from the building entrance). It appears that most customers park closer to the building. The city indicated that the parking stalls will be closed for two weeks during construction. For all other times of the temporary easement the parking stalls will be open. In addition, during the entire temporary easement, the access points and drive lanes encumbered by the temporary easement will be open. To calculate the loss of the parking stalls, the appraiser concluded to a rental rate of $30 per month per stall. The city indicated that the stalls would be closed for two weeks for construction. In order to account for delays, the appraiser estimates four weeks of closure. Therefore, the total parking stall rent is $30 x 21 parking stalls = $630. This amount is applied as an additional temporary easement cost. Page 66 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES ROW Acquisition: Acquired for road purposes. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 100% loss in value. The new ROW area is reported to be 0 SF. Permanent Easement Acquisition: The easement area is used for trail, drainage, and utility purposes. The new easement area is reported to be 0 SF. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 95% loss in value. Temporary Easement: Used by the city for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. The city reports that the temporary easement will be 9,791 SF. ur-r;ary of Acnu_ tip imate of Value :e s+� quiscion ii # * met Land Value � � 0 or 2,02 ,C 0 Site Irnproven-?r s otaL./aNe BEFOPAc{si -+. = a� S t -0- 0 Sae 0 2,02 JO "ic ate •f V lue Aftga4cr;Ai y -ota✓a •e Befo a Acn si- 2 n 10 ess -_�O\_ Accuisition� j j ij a - x� -0 ::1reE.:riptive E- � n- - ' ■ ■ 7 7 -P en iF 1 iC io a :0 Perms --rea+E = n---it r • ■ r i1 c 7 �—perSF M`ro I =30ram r • ■ �0 ,r tiT� ,-� � • � s ■ _ r - s r a- s-mull 10 4or 4Ie s r 17w. _�T T rw am � a r.- Cs _ 1 i� 1F--Acqu� p = _ �` _ " JO 09, Z 1-'r Z S. r tl- = a.- W i ! 1016, i 1010 l+&I c.- tase� r P .? �0= . T 1 ■ an a ■ii 4 ■ I■ ■ ■ l■ alLL 1L1l Ll1!lL1l� �L ■ �11IIflf'-�'1�-� !., AL_ L, _.AGN'v e:.5117s ourrcred) R It nate Computation ROW Acqusition Area !� �F } 7 5 .E 3F k .�%G hts ems= $0 Prescriptive Easemen!- O '3 aE3Fx•!0°r:%hts Y s= $0 ermanent Easement _ � ■ � L j x= 7 5 we=3F x- •moo gt ICE _ $0 ' Site Improvements } ti $0 SeveranceN. low, $0 Temporary Easement �9,7G S-x$7.2--7)erSFO%x18months7-= $;.0,6-3}Dark.ig ($ 1,27 Total (rounder!) $11,300 *Slight deviations may exist due to rounding. EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME Reasonable Exposure Time: 6 to 12 months Marketing Time Opinion: 6 to 12 months +/- after before the effective date of the appraisal. the effective date of the appraisal. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 67 DEFINITIONS MARKET VALUE - The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (A) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (B) both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (C) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market, (D) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (E) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — The right to use another's land for a stated purpose. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — An interest in real property that conveys use but not ownership to a portion of a property. Common easements include but are not limited to access, utility, and right of way. Specialty easements include but are not limited to conservation, preservation, aerial, and flowage. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute TEMPORARY EASEMENT (definition) — An easement granted for a specific purpose and applicable for a specific time period. A construction easement, for example, is terminated after the construction of the improvement and the unencumbered fee interest in the land reverts to the owner. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute Page 68 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES Regarding any adverse environmental and/or improvement structural conditions (such as, but not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, mold, construction defects or inadequacies, etc.) present in the improvements, on the site, or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: None are apparent, however, appraiser is not an expert in this field. Value assumes no hazardous or structural conditions exist. Value assumes any abandoned wells will be properly sealed. If any of these conditions exist the appraised value could differ significantly. EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS As stated by USPAP; Extraordinary Assumption: An assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions of conclusions. None Hypothetical Condition: That which is contrary to what exists but is supposed for the purpose of analysis. Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 69 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. The appraisers assume no responsibility for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor do the appraisers render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership and good management. 2. The furnished legal description is assumed to be correct. 3. Any sketch in the report may show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraisers have made no survey of the property. It is assumed unless otherwise noted that no survey has been viewed and that all improvements are located within the legally described property. 4. The appraisers are not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made the appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. 5. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of value for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 6. The appraisers assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraisers assume no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering, which might be required to discover such factors. 7. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, radon gas, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 8. Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the appraisers, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, the appraisers can assume no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished to the appraisers. 9. Disclosure of the contents of the appraisal report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which the appraisers are affiliated. No part of the contents of this report, or copy thereof (including conclusions as to the property value, the identity of the appraiser, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organizations, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected), shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or any other public means of communications without the prior written consent and approval of the appraisers. Page 70 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Assumptions & Limiting Conditions — continued 10. The appraisers have no present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised; and neither the employment to make the appraisal, nor the compensation for it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property. The appraisers have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. 11. The appraiser has personally inspected the subject site (unless noted otherwise). The comparable sales data has been viewed via aerial maps, photographs and/or online street views along with file pictures, when available. To the best of the appraiser's knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this report are true and correct, and the appraisers have not knowingly withheld any significant information. 12. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The appraisal is for the sole use of the named client. 13. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of the property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider possible non-compliance with the requirements of ADA in estimating the value of the property. 14. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the reported analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report was prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 15. The appraised value opinion assumes all leases (if any) are current and paid in full as of the effective date of the appraisal. 16. Excel grids and tables may have slight deviations due to rounding, which may have a nominal impact on value. 17. The appraised value opinion assumes all formulas used in the Excel grids throughout the report are accurate. 18. Unless noted, value assumes no apparent adverse site, building or zoning issues or conditions. 19. Site and building sizes are based on public record, data services, client and/or appraiser measurement at the time of appraisal and are considered reliable, but not guaranteed. Actual sizes herein could vary if made by an engineer/surveyor/contractor. 20. If any of the above if found to be different, value could change. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 71 CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1) The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2) The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions. 3) 1 have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4) 1 have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5) My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6) My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7) My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8) The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Appraisal Institute's Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, which includes the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice. 9) Erin Waytas has made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. Erin Waytas did not inspect the subject property. Ethan Waytas wrote and selected all the data in the report. Erin Waytas read the report, concurred with the findings, and then co -signed the report. 10) No one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. 11) In accordance with the competency provision USPAP, I have verified that my knowledge, experience and education are sufficient to allow me to competently complete this appraisal. See attached qualifications. 12) As of the date of this report, Erin Waytas and Ethan Waytas have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the appraisal institute. 13) The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representative. 14) We have provided services (one restricted appraisal report regarding retaining wall benefit) as an appraiser regarding the subject property within the 3-year period immediately preceding acceptance to this assignment. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: see report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: see report Page 72 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER hereby certify: have personally inspected the property herein appraised and that I have previously afforded the property owner the opportunity to accompany me during an inspection. Such opportunity was afforded to the owner/representative and said individual did not accompany me on the inspection. That to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements contained in the appraisal herein above set forth are true and the information upon which the opinions expressed therein are based as correct; subject to the limiting conditions herein set forth. That I understand that such appraisal is to be used in connection with an acquisition, and that such appraisal has been made in conformity with the appropriate State laws, regulations, policies and procedures applicable to appraisal of such purposes and that to the best of my knowledge no portion of the value assigned to such property consists of items which are non-compensable under the established State law. That in making this appraisal I have disregarded any increase or decrease in the before value caused by the project for which the property is being acquired. That neither my employment nor the compensation for making this appraisal and report are in any way contingent upon the value reported herein. That I have no direct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition of such property appraised. That I will not reveal the findings and results of such appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of the acquiring agency until authorized by agency officials to do so, or until I am required to do so, by due process of law, or until I am released from this obligation by having publicly testified as to such findings. That the conclusion set forth in this appraisal was reached without collaboration or direction as to value. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: See Report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: See Report Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 73 QUALIFICATIONS Appraisal Experience Presently and since 2006, Ethan Wavtas, MAI has been employed as an employee of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (10 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. He is currently a full time licensed certified general real estate appraiser, partner, and director of the company's IT department. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, cinema, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, Lakeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO, subdivisions, and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Tax Appeal — variety of property types, including commercial, industrial, and multi -family. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Testimony -- Court, commission, arbitration, mediation, etc. testimony has been given Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #40368613 Holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute Education -- Graduate of the University of Minnesota: College of Science and Engineering, Twin Cities Campus Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, with distinction, 3.86 GPA. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Basic Appraisal Procedures -- Basic Appraisal Principles -- 2012-2013 15-Hour National Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice -- General Appraiser Sales Comparison Approach -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 1 -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 2 -- Advanced Income Capitalization -- General Appraiser Report Writing and Case Studies -- Real Estate Finance, Statistics and Valuation Modeling -- 2014-2015 7-hour National USPAP Update Course -- General Appraiser Site Valuation & Cost Approach -- Advanced Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use -- Advanced Concepts & Case Studies -- Quantitative Analysis Page 74 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Appraisal Experience Presently and since 1985, William R. Waytas has been employed as a full-time real estate appraiser. Currently a partner and President of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (11 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. Mr. Waytas was employed with Iver C. Johnson & Company, Ltd., Phoenix, AZ from 1985 to 1987. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, hotel, hotel water park, bed & breakfast, cinema, marina, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, /akeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Review — residential, commercial and land development. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - most appraisal experience is in the greater Twin Cities Metro Area (typically an hour from downtown metro). Numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #4000813. Appraisal Institute: SRA, Senior Residential Appraiser Designation, General Associate Member Employee Relocation Council: CRP Certified Relocation Professional Designation. International Right -Of -Way Association: Member HUD/FHA: On Lender Selection Roster and Review Appraiser DNR: Approved appraiser for Department of Natural Resources Testimony -- Court, deposition, commission, arbitration & administrative testimony given. Mediator -- Court appointed in Wright County. Committees -- President of Metro/Minnesota Chapter, 2002, Appraisal Institute. -- Chairman of Residential Admissions, Metro/MN Chapter, Al. -- Chairman Residential Candidate Guidance, Metro/Minnesota Chapter, Al. -- Elm Creek Watershed Commission, Medina representative 3 years. -- Medina Park Commission, 3 years. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 75 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Education -- Graduate of Bemidji State University, Minnesota. B.S. degree in Bus. Ad. -- During college, summer employment in building trades (residential and commercial). -- Graduate of Cecil Lawter Real Estate School. Past Arizona Real Estate License. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Course 101-Introduction to Appraising Real Property. -- Numerous Standards of Professional Practice Seminar. -- Fair Lending Seminar. -- Eminent Domain & Condemnation Appraising. -- Eminent Domain (An In -Depth Analysis) -- Property Tax Appeal -- Eminent Domain -- Business Practices and Ethics -- Scope of Work -- Construction Disturbances and Temporary Loss of Going Concern -- Uniform Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book Seminar) -- Partial Interest Valuation Divided (conservation easements, historic preservation easements, life estates, subsurface rights, access easements, air rights, water rights, transferable development rights) Commercial/Industrial/Subdivision Courses & Seminars -- Capitalization Theory & Techniques -- Highest & Best Use Seminar -- General & Residential State Certification Review Seminar -- Subdivision Analysis Seminar. -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (general) -- Advanced Income Capitalization Seminar -- Advanced Industrial Valuation -- Appraisal of Local Retail Properties -- Appraising Convenience Stores -- Analyzing Distressed Real Estate -- Evaluating Commercial Construction -- Fundamentals of Separating Real Property, Personal Property and Intangible Business Assets Residential Courses & Seminars -- Course 102-Applied Residential Appraising -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (residential) -- HUD Training session local office for FHA appraisals -- Familiar with HUD Handbook 4150.1 REV-1 & other material from local FHA office. -- Appraiser/Underwriter FHA Training -- Residential Property Construction and Inspection -- Numerous other continuing education seminars for state licensing & Al Speaking Engagements -- Bankers -- Auditors -- Assessors -- Relocation (Panel Discussion) Publications -- Real Estate Appraisal Practice (book): Acknowledgement -- Articles for Finance & Commerce and Minnesota Real Estate Journal Page 76 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Report Type Appraisal Report File # G2401011 — JR&R II LLC Effective Date February 2, 2024 Prepared By: Ethan Waytas, MAI, Appraiser William R. Waytas, Appraiser Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 12805 Highway 55, Suite 300 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Tel:952.544.8966 1 Fax:952.544.8969 NAGELL APPRAISAL INCORPORATED 12805 Highway 55, #300 Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 952-544-8966 Established in 1968 Fax: 952-544-8969 City of Monticello February 5, 2024 Attn: Craig Jochum, P.E., City Engineer 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 To Craig Jochum: In accordance with your request, an appraisal report has been made on the following described property: Subject Property: Commercial 300 7th Street West Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 Described below is a summary of the appraisal report contained herein. Property Overview The City of Monticello is proposing to replace a failing retaining wall along 7th Street West. The retaining wall is used to support adjoining parking lots and allow for a concrete sidewalk. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring temporary easements. The subject is improved with a multi -tenant commercial building. County information indicates the building was constructed in 2000 and has 87,097 SF of building area. The gross site area is 357,628 SF. The proposed project was concluded to not impact the subject building improvements. Therefore, only the land and any site improvements in the acquisition area are analyzed to conclude to damages. This report reflects the data found and the opinions concluded from a before and after value appraisal of the subject property (land only). Intended Use Acquisition negotiation purposes by the city Intended User(s) City of Monticello iii Letter of Transmittal - Continued Extraordinary Assumptions None Hvpothetical Conditions Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Propertv Riqhts Appraised - Fee Simple Interest: The subject is improved with a commercial building. Given the scope of the assignment, the appraisal reflects the fee simple interest. Propertv Components Appraised - Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. - Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment (FF&E): The appraised value does not include personal property or FF&E. - Business Value: The appraised value does not include business value. Hiqhest and Best Use Conclusions - As Vacant: Develop with commercial if the site was vacant. - As Improved: Not applicable given the scope of the assignment. Valuation Methodoloqv Given the nature of the project, only the land is being appraised and any site improvements in the acquisition area. • Before Value: The before condition reflects market value before the proposed acquisition. • After Value: The after value reflects the property after the acquisition which considers any changes in site size, new easements, loss of any site improvements, and/or any severance damages to the remainder (if appropriate). • Temporary Easement: A fair rate of return the property owner should receive for use of the temporary easement area during the easement period, if any. 1V Letter of Transmittal — Continued The property is legally described herein. The appraisal assumes that the property meets all current environmental standards. The appraisal analysis and conclusions are subject to certain limiting conditions and assumptions described herein. The final value opinion, as of February 2, 2024, is: Before Market Value (land value): After Market Value (land value): DAMAGES DUE TO ACQUSITION: Temporary Easement Cost: TOTAL (damages plus temporary easement cost): Exposure Time / Marketinq Time Exposure Time Marketing Time $2,595,000 $2,595,000 $0 $12,493 $12,500 rnd. Final values reflect "market exposure" time of 6 to 12 months before the effective date of the appraisal. Changes in the market, use, lease and/or building subsequent to the effective appraisal date could impact value. Marketing times for appropriately priced properties is generally 6 to 12 months +/-. Our company has 10 employees, has been in business since 1968 and has sufficient knowledge, education, experience, resources and/or contacts to competently complete this assignment. The accompanying report contains data secured from my personal investigation and from sources considered to be reliable; however, correctness is not guaranteed. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements contained in this report are true and correct. Neither my employment to make this appraisal, nor the compensation, is contingent upon the value reported. This report has been prepared in conformity with the code of professional ethics and standards of professional appraisal practice of the Appraisal Institute and appraisal standards set forth by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Please contact us if you have further questions. Sincerely, Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 www.nagelimn.com William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 131 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS ........................ VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY ..................... INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL..................................................... DATE OF APPRAISAL.............................................................................. SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT ................................................... PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED........................................................... PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED .............................................. IDENTIFICATION...................................................................................... REAL ESTATE TAXES............................................................................. SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY ............................................... REGIONAL DATA...................................................................................... REGIONALMAP....................................................................................... CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION .............................................. NEIGHBORHOOD MAP............................................................................ SURROUNDING USES............................................................................. BEFORE ANALYSIS................................................................................. SITE DESCRIPTION................................................................................. ZONINGMAP............................................................................................ ZONING..................................................................................................... FUTURE LAND USE MAP........................................................................ FLOODMAP.............................................................................................. AERIAL / PLAT MAP................................................................................. TOPOGRAPHY MAP................................................................................ WETLAND MAP........................................................................................ SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS..................................................................... HIGHEST AND BEST USE....................................................................... COST APPROACH.................................................................................... INCOME APPROACH............................................................................... SALES COMPARISON APPROACH........................................................ RECONCILIATION.................................................................................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME ................................................... AFTER ANALYSIS.................................................................................... PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................................................................ SKETCH OF ACQUISITION...................................................................... PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA ............................................. ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE ...................................................... SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES ..................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME ................................................... DEFINITIONS............................................................................................ ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES ......................................... EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ....................................... CERTIFICATION....................................................................................... CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER............................................................... QUALIFICATIONS..................................................................................... .. 7 .. 8 .. 8 .. 8 .. 9 10 10 11 11 12 13 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 40 40 41 58 58 59 60 61 63 65 67 67 68 69 69 70 72 73 74 SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS .r— Location: 300 7th Street West, Monticello Project: Retaining Wall Parcel Number: n/a Appraisal Report: Appraisal Report Current Use: Commercial (single -occupant retail) Extraordinary Assumptions: No, see rear of report for standard assumptions Hypothetical Conditions: Yes, see rear of report Site Area: 357,628 SF (8.21 acres) Building Improvements: Single -occupant commercial building Current Zoning: CCD, Central Community District (guided RC, Regional Commercial) Highest & Best Use: Commercial development (as vacant) Personal Property: No personal property included Property Rights Appraised: Fee Simple Right of Way Acquisition: None Existing Prescriptive Area: None Permanent Easement: None Temporary Easement 10,853 SF Temporary Easement Length: 18 months: February 2, 2024 to July 31, 2025 TOTAL DAMAGES & COSTS: $12,500 rounded Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 7 VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY Type of Value: This report provides an opinion of Market Value. Condition of Value: This report provides an opinion of the as -is value. Occupancy: The subject appears to be 100% occupied by Runnings. INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL Intended Use: The client intends to use the appraisal for acauisition neaotiation purposes. City of Monticello No party, other than the named client and listed intended users, may use or Intended User(s): rely upon any part of this report without the prior written authorization of both the named client and the appraiser. This report is not valid unless it contains the original signatures in blue ink. Any unauthorized third party relying upon any portion of this report does so at its own risk. DATE OF APPRAISAL Effective Date: February 2, 2024 Inspection Date: February 2, 2024 Date of Report: February 5, 2024 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT USPAP defines Scope of Work as: The type and extent of research and analyses in an assignment. For each appraisal, appraisal review and appraisal consulting assignment, an appraiser must: 1) 2) 3) 1) Identify the problem to be solved, 2) Determine and perform the scope of work necessary to develop credible assignment results; and 3) Disclose the scope of work in the report. Provide a reasonably supported value opinion as it relates to the intended use & scope. Per assignment request (retained in workfile), the following degree of research and analysis has been made. The narrative format used is an Appraisal Report, which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2a of USPAP. See individual approaches for further detail. The scope of work for this appraisal includes: • a) Property Identification: Public record, plat maps, zoning maps and aerial photographs were used to identify the subject property. • b) Property Inspection: A viewina of the subject orooertv and neiahborhood by the appraiser. Physical factors: Based on property viewing and conversations with the client, city and county officials. Lot size is based on county information. Economic Factors: Consisted of gathering of information from market experts, city and/or county offices, and internet about the region, community, neighborhood, zoning, utilities, and any pending projects in the area that may affect the subject property. c) Extent of Data Researched: Sales data of competing properties within the subject market area were given primary consideration. The most relevant data is used in this report. Sources include, appraiser data files, assessor, internet, developers, agents, MILS, periodicals, in -office library, etc. In addition, during the course of appraisal practice and of this appraisal process, the appraiser has had ongoing discussions with market participants (buyers, sellers, property managers, real estate agents/brokers, appraisers, etc.) and/or viewed market data in relation to how the current real estate market may impact the subject value. The appraiser has not researched the title or ownership records. • d) Type and Extent of Analysis Applied at Opinions or Conclusions: An extensive review of market data was performed. The most recent, similar and proximate data has been used. The data used will be adjusted on a grid. Reasonable and appropriate collection, verification, analysis and viewing has been performed in the valuation approaches, given the purpose and intended use of the report. A final value opinion will be discussed and correlated. The data used was obtained from sources considered credible, yet its accuracy is not guaranteed. If found otherwise, value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 9 PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED What is valued in a real property appraisal is an estate subject to specified interests. Therefore, an appraiser's task is to identify not only the estate (e.g., the fee simple estate, the leasehold estate, the leased fee estate, the life estate) but also the interests associated with the real estate, such as leases, easements, restrictions, encumbrances, reservations, covenants, contracts, declarations, special assessments, ordinances, or other interests of a similar nature. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, Page 59) Fee Simple Interest: Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7tn Edition) Note: This would typically reflect an owner -occupied property. When the property rights appraised are the unencumbered fee simple interest of the real estate, the appraised value is subject to normal easements for drainage, public streets and utilities, if any. The effect of any existing mortgage or delinquent taxes on the subject property has not been considered in this appraisal. Leased Fee Interest: The ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7tn Edition) In appraisal practice, the lessor's interest in a property is considered a leased fee regardless of the duration of the lease, the specified rent, the parties to the lease, or any of the terms in the lease contract. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 151" Edition, Page 62) Conclusion of Rights Appraised: The subject is currently used for commercial purposes. Given the scope of the assignment, the fee simple interest will be applied. PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. The methods utilized for the real estate valuation include: • Sales Comparison Approach FF&E: The appraised value does not include any values of fixtures, furnishings and equipment. Business Value: There is no business value included in the appraised value. Page 10 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 IDENTIFICATION Address: County PID: Legal: Fee Owner Census Tract # 300 71h Street West Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 155068001020 & 155068000030 155068001020: SECT-11 TWP-121 RANGE-025 KIRKMAN ADDN LOT- 002 BLOCK-001 155068000030: SECT-11 TWP-121 RANGE-025 KIRKMAN ADDN OUTLOT C JR&R II LLC 1002.03 REAL ESTATE TAXES Taxes, Total Effective Tax Special Assessments / Solid Waste Fee / Other Total Tax & Assessments: per County Records Payable 2023 $64,110 LO $64,110 Delinquent taxes: I None noted COUNTY ASSESSOR'S VALUE Land Building TOTAL Payable 2023 $1,634,200 $907,000 $2,541,200 Payable 2024 n/a n/a n/a Payable 2024 $1,887,200 $1,238,800 $3,126,000 The subject tax ratio is 2.52%. The assessed value and taxes shown above reflect the overall property. The appraised value given in this report assumes any/all special assessments, and/or liens are paid in full and that there are no delinquent taxes, fees, payments, association dues, etc. Should it be found that any of these exist the amount should be deducted from the appraised value. Appraiser did not research these items; typically, a title search would reveal any of these. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 11 SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY Listing History: I The subject does not appear to be currently listed for sale. Sale Price: n/a Sale Date: n/a Buyer: n/a Seller: n/a Sales History: Terms: n/a Source: Public records No reported sales of the subject within the past 3 years. Pending Sale: I None noted or reported. The subject is improved with a single -occupant commercial building. Public Building History: records indicate the building was constructed in 2000 and has 87,097 SF of gross building area. Lease History: I Lease information not available. Leasehold Interest: I None noted Association Dues: The subject is reportedly not part of an association or common interest community (CIC). Page 12 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL DATA Metro Area Regional hub Minneapolis -Saint Paul is the most populous urban area in Minnesota and is composed of 186 cities and townships. Built around the Mississippi, Minnesota and St. Croix rivers, the area is also nicknamed The Twin Cities for its two largest cities, Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Saint Paul is the second largest city in Minnesota, as well as the state capital. The area is part of a larger U.S. Census division named Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI, the country's 16th-largest metropolitan area, composed of eleven counties in Minnesota and two counties in Wisconsin. This larger area, in turn, is enveloped in the U.S. Census combined statistical area called Minneapolis -St. Paul -St. Cloud, MN -WI with an estimated population of 3.65 million people in 2019. In both of the fully developed central cities —Minneapolis and St. Paul —the population has declined due to smaller household sizes, yet growth in other areas of their counties has been more than offsetting. Below is detailed where this growth has occurred: POPULATION Census Census Forecast Growth Growth County 2000 2010 2022 2000 - 2010 2010-2022 total annual total annual Hennepin 1,116,200 1,152,425 1,260,121 3.25% 0.32% 9.35% 0.78% Ramsey 511,035 508,640 536,413 -0.47% -0.05% 5.46% 0.46% aD 3 Dakota 355,904 398,552 443,341 11.98% 1.20% 11.24% 0.94% m N Anoka 298,084 330,844 368,864 10.99% 1.10% 11.49% 0.95% 3 Washington 201,130 238,136 275,912 18.4% 1.84% 15.86% 1.32% ci Scott 89,498 129,928 154,520 45.17% 4.52% 18.93% 1.58% Wright 89,986 124,700 148,003 38.58% 3.86% 18.69% 1.56% L Carver 70,205 91,042 110,034 29.68% 2.97% 20.86% 1.74% '0 Sherburne 64,417 88,499 100,824 37.38% 3.74% 13.93% 1.16% N Chisago 41,101 53,887 57,988 31.11% 3.11% 7.61% 0.63% Total 2,837,560 3,116,653 3,456,020 1 9.84% 1 0.98% 10.89% 0.91% Overall, the area has experienced moderate to good income growth. Annualized income growth of 2.5% to 4.0% is consistent with national averages. MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME Census Estimate Growth County 2010 2022 2010-2022 total annual Hennepin 59,236 92,595 56.32% 4.69% L Ramsey 50,136 78,108 55.79% 4.65% m Dakota 69,508 101,360 45.82% 3.82% a Anoka 65,771 95,782 45.63% 3.80% v Washington 77,239 110,828 43.49% 3.62% Y) Scott 77,314 118,268 53.00% 4.41 % m u Wright 66,833 102,980 54.09% 4.51% c Carver 80,173 116,308 45.07% 3.76% Y) Sherburne 69,971 96,889 38.47% 3.21 % Chisago 63,810 97,446 52.71 % 4.39% Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 13 Regional Data — continued Economic Trends The current residential interest rates for a typical 30-year mortgage are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Commercial rates are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Rates are expected to increase to combat inflation. New construction labor costs have steadily increased along with material costs as well, however during the COVID-19 pandemic costs increased drastically due to supply chains not being able to meet demand. Overall, construction costs are at all-time highs. New construction of commercial, industrial, and multi -family is occurring, however, limited office new construction is occurring. Listing prices have been increasing steadily since 2012 +/- and are starting to approach peak levels similar to the market in 2006, which was a period of high seller expectations. However, recent buyer and seller expectations regarding value and list prices appear to be trending towards equilibrium. Although well diversified, the TCMA and surrounding Minnesota economy is not immune to the recent soft/declining trends of the overall economy. IN — I� 140 155 IN 125 in 115 1f0 Sry7016 PrlinnesotaIndex WNQ17 "np20fa SIPM9 Wawa Wp20r u.S_Index Sep-20 0n•20 U-20 p_20 b-21 H4l1 HYr•21 A9,21 IYF�-21 tun 11 2VLF1 Au6 21 s1p31 %ch w I— H nM A� Y.. Aa 0.2 9.9 solo 125.9 oft-20 123A 1 2a 12Aa O-20 120A 1-21 I25A F.b.0 MS Mr-21 12" Apr-21 12AS WW F1 1272 1�0 1un21 2129 LL21 12a•9 12y Au 21 129A S21 II9.9 120 115 Wl M AW 0.4 Yw Ago 5.8 110 SIMpa0f6 5"M7 S p201B Sep M Lp2020 Lp702' Source: Minnesota DEED The recent COVID-19 pandemic created a significant drop in the economy due to high unemployment and decreased spending in early 2020. However, spending has increased, employment is recovering, and the COVID-19 vaccines have given markets stability. Page 14 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued EMPLOYMENT & LABOR FRED — Unemployment Rate in Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI (MSA) — Unemployment Rate in Minnesota — Unemployment Rate 15.0 rw 100 m 7.5 a - 5.0 25 0.0 1950 1955 1950 1965 1970 1975 19W 1995 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Shaded areas indicate U_S_ recessions_ SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics fred-stlouisred org Over the past ten years, unemployment rates have gone from a peak of around 9.0% to near historical lows of around 2% in late 2018. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created a significant spike in the unemployment rate. The most recent data, shown below, indicates that the rate has dropped significantly and is approaching 2019 levels. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 15 Regional Data — continued APARTMENT MARKET Vacancy & Market Asking Rent Per Unit 8.0% F—.i 81.M 7.5% — — 91.ma 7.0% 'm.m 6.5% f1,60a S � 60% fl,ypp S EEE 5.5% E1,000 5.0% 51,300 1.5% E1,200 6.0% E1,100 13 1 ti 15 116 I 17 I 17 19 W 1 21 122 23 24 125 126 127 51,00a i �: Costar —, CoStar reports that rents have been trending upward consistently for the past 10+ years. The current average asking rate for an apartment unit in the Twin Cities Metro is around $1,398 per month. Vacancy has fluctuated, but was trending downward until 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a spike in vacancy, which has since been declining. However, vacancy is higher due to significant new construction, both in Minneapolis and surrounding suburbs. The following chart shows the annual absorption of apartment units: Absorption Units 7n W SK a1c 5 A � ax 1K 0 13 19 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2. 23 24 25 29 i� �-+��JI,CIly,,� GxN u,wena ■ W- tmarRup mrn�ton ln. Page 16 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued RETAIL MARKET 1"aearsyRa[e NetAAingRatc kandert-5t"i4n W Atk9orp(k- &S% 0 $19A per sq. it. 0 28,000 sq. % 213,771 sq. h. Fgue 1: 0ipea Vaoanty Rote and AhwprU 1,000,000 9 7 600,000 400,000 N0,400 4 0 tt� 2 I (400r00Q) 0 N� �Ahsarpriao—Villain Source! [BRE Rm arrh, Hl 2021_ CBRE indicates that current retail vacancy rates have been increasing and asking rent rates have been declining. There has been absorption of vacant space in the market, however, many developers are cautious about new retail construction. Strong locations retain typical demand; more speculative retail construction generally does not occur. Similarly, Cushman & Wakefield also shows stagnating retail asking rents and increasing vacancy: ■.14 2 h 9i1laT+7_l: To YM:?sad ssa 2019 2017 2619 2019 21020 � Asking ReM S PSF Dme:9 Vacarx.r Rate M 9% 4% Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 17 Regional Data — continued OFFICE MARKET CBRE data shows that asking rents for the overall office market have generally been increasing. This has also corresponded with an increase in vacancy rates as well. With the COVID-19 pandemic, many employers and workers realized that working remotely was a viable option. It is anticipated that many more companies will offer remote work full-time or part-time; this could impact office space as companies need less square footage. The counterpoint, however, is that companies might retain the same space and create social distancing opportunities in case of possible future COVID-19 flare-ups. FIGURE 3: Historical Vacancy Rates vs Asking Rakes Vacancy Rate 25% 20% 1546 1096 596 096 do Downtown Vacancy Avg Asking Rate (NNN) $1$SO $19.00 $1750 S17.00 $i6.50 $16_UO $15.50 $15_UO $m50 $14.00 oti � Suburban Vacancy - Downtown Asking Rate -Suburban Asking Rate Source CBRE R.eeLs I k 012023. FIGURE 6: Historical Downta m Vacancy W Class Vacancy Rate 35% 3crx 25% 10% 15% 1096 59G 0% —Class A —Class B —Class C 58udte: CBRE Ra aarfl. 01 202a FIGURE 5: Hiskarical Suburban Vacancy by Class Vacancy Rate 35% 30% 2.5% 20% 15% — 10% 5% 0% (�2vxq C', 2pp os.op 0,sco C�,. mad` G52 2.60 —Chas A —Class B —Claw C 56urCL-. CBRE F:06arCk 41 2D73 Page 18 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued INDUSTRIAL MARKET The industrial market nationwide has seen increases in rental rates and occupancy. Construction costs have been increasing as well, due to shortages created by the COVID-19 pandemic. In Minnesota the trend is similar to the country overall, vacancy has decreased, construction of new buildings is significant, CBRE indicates that vacancy has been dropping, construction starts have increased, and absorption is significant: RGURE 1: Quarterly and Annual Met Absorption vs_ Vacancy Net Absorption CMSF} 10 9 7 l 6 5 4 Vacancy 7% 6% 5% 4% 3 2 , � � LE0 = ,1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 11111111111111101 11111111111111102 11111111111111103 04 Vacancy Rate Source CBRE Research 012D23. Speculative development, per CBRE, has been significant. For example, almost 5,538,000 million square feet of speculative construction occurred in 2021/2021; of this, 9% has been leased. Buildings in 2022 are about 61 % leased. It appears the market is supporting speculative industrial development at this time. =IGURE I ❑eliveries, Absorpkion, and Availabi lity Rake #or Speculati4e Constructim SF (440'5) 30 35% 25 20 KI 25% 20% 15 1595 10 1Q90 4 096 _° ti° -P� ,�° -P ,9 NQ �° 16 TQ %Q 1° -° -P 'tip Spec E+Q i4eries 11111111111111SpetAbsorption SpecAvailahility Rate Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 19 Regional Data — continued Cushman & Wakefield also reports decreasing vacancy rates and significant increases in asking rates for industrial space. OVERALL VACANCY & ASKING RENT Avung R"I 3 P-Sr Vacan-M Rafe Total construction and absorption has been generally stable, but in 2021 there was significantly more absorption than construction. This would imply there is demand for more industrial space. ;SPACE DEMAND IDELI VERIES 2019 2019 202D M21 2022 Y M 2 D2 3 ■NaLAcm rplion, 5F ■CawftucWnCorplefrne. SF Page 20 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL MAP B E N T O N h OYeSt 23 °Braham West stab Stanchfield° Rush City °Trade Lake re Fo �rtell Springvale uk Rapids °VVyanett Harris P 0 L K C 95 Pnnc o Cambridge' Crwx °Luc ' 15 um— S A ° unnse Eureka l Spencer •Bradford Era h Center Milttow Brook Augusta S i E R B 11 R N E - Ba am Lake .Clearwater Orrock Centuria ylors is ✓1 Stac Center CityIts ■ dstromEast TAF Bethel y sa ity nia Dresser Wyomn 'VV RiuerGro e � °Osceola I s C O Nk 24 Amery Annandale Otsego O # Forest Lake East Ibertville Ramsey ° °AndO Scandia Rarmington r W R I G T er Maple Lake * Dayton. Albion Center a_ SY Michael uffalo Rogers Champlino�� Coon 14 prds a Oneka Lake Deer Star Prairie °Stanton forth ' laine° Centerville 'Hugo -ork C ow M I N N E 5 0 T 25 a Bt0 B 0ktyn Park. 8. Lake Park eF While Bear % ke Son rset Ric Cokato Corcoran Rockford Maple Grov rooklyn Hew - ShOrev ° peach w - ' e nd Waverly Sarah Eagle L ke 12 - 9a Mahtomedi Iwater Howard Lake Montrose H E N N E P N He op EY WASHINGTON• S T C R I x Delon Independence PtymOuttP $$ HOS ° G den Falc ° o h St Paul Oa Park Hei o V ley H s° Map 00 •Lake Elmo Hudson Roberts He and VIAnsted"k Waterto - Long Lake a eta _ apOHs Oakdale Lakelan v ak 1 (Spring Park. Minnetonka° 18g ° . LOui Park l Woodbury Silver Lake 7 Holl wo Minnetrista Deephaven Ho ins West Paul ° °Alton 1 Lester Prairie vrewood dine ° o o St Paul 18 O �ke Waconla �I r-� � r� end C • anhassen� den rairie ie 10 a •aver Falls aconia 5e Grove O D A R V E R 212 Bloc ington J/ y r Gro eights Dung Amerl 41 e . a agaR`� 77 Glencoe - a Igren ° Apple alley Hastin P I E R C E 212 Creek Hamburg 13 42 ° Rose mo Prior Lake Trimbe le Ells rth 25 282 Lakeville D A ~— T A Jordan arminglon 5 Helena 70 elle Plane a on Arling[o Cedar Lake Bay City B L E S C T ° Gaylord New Pragu astle Rock Red Henderson Webster 3 Lansdale Cannon Falls e Sueur G O O D ' .Lw on Wheatland 19 Northfield twC Kcharld E S ll E ll Montgomery R I C E Orer MemorialHs L L E T Le Cente E Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 21 CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Type of neighborhood: Outlying Suburban Northwestern Community Percent built-up: 90% developed (within city limits) Stage of Development: Stable with growth Neighborhood boundaries: City Limits Redevelopment Some new development and updating are occurring Major Transportation: Interstate 94, Highway 25 Single Family Residential 65% Two- & Multi -Family 10% Predominant type Commercial/Industrial 15% conformity: Other/Vacant/Public Land 10% Total: 100 % Typical property age: New to 75+ years, predominant under 30 years Single -Family Home Sales: $125,000 to $400,000+ Apartment Sales: $40,000 to $80,000+ per unit Office Property Sales: $75 to $125+ per SF Retail Property Sales: $100 to $200+ per SF Industrial Property Sales: $40 to $80+ per SF Capitalization Rates: 7-10% Historic Subject Market: Stable, some growth Neighborhood Trend: Stable, some growth Detrimental influences: No major apparent Area / City: Monticello is located about 45 minutes northwest of Downtown Minneapolis and 40 minutes southeast of St. Cloud. Access to Interstate 94 is conveniently located near the subject parcel. Interstate 94 provides direct access to the Twin Cities Metro Area, St. Cloud, and surrounding communities. Monticello has a reputation as a stable community, with nearby shopping and access to many major roadways. Access to Downtown and surrounding communities is considered average. Major shopping and commerce are located within the City of Monticello. Neighborhood: The subject is located along the Interstate 94 corridor at the intersection of Interstate 94 and Highway 25. Surrounding uses include commercial, apartments, and future development land. Page 22 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 City & Neighborhood Description — continued Subject City: As of the 2010 census the population was 12,759, in 2000 it was 7,868. This represents a net increase of 62.2% from 2000 to 2010. The 2020 population for the city is 14,455, an increase of 13.3% from 2010. The 2022 population estimate for the city is 14,804, or about an increase of 2.4% from 2020. Median Income 2019 to 2022 $120,000 $100, 000 $80, 000 $60,000 — $40,000 $20, 000 — $0 2019 202D 2021 2022 ■ Minnesota ■ Wright County Monticello The median income for the city is below county levels and state levels (per Census Bureau). Income has increased in recent years. Median Home Prices: Citv of Monticello Source: NorthstarMLS Stats Median Sales Price Twin Cities Region — Monticello $450K $400K $350K $300K $250K $200i 1.2019 7-2020 1-2027 1-2022 1-2023 7.2024 Twin Cities Region & Monticello: Single -Family Each data pmM is 12 months of act A y Dad rsfmm February 3, M24. All dad from NonhstarMLS. Data deemed reliable but not guaranosd. l nl S9ar,,82024 Shmi,gTime_ The median household income for the city is below the Twin Cities Metro. The median home price started to plateau since the start of 2022; this is likely attributed to increasing interest rates. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 23 NEIGHBORHOOD MAP Page 24 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SURRO�NpING ® to subs a`te the imea di NYNO vAkersta to the 000- \�rllorp°(all \ BEFORE ANALYSIS Page 26 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SITE DESCRIPTION Dimensions: Gross Site Area: Net Site Area: Topography / Low Area Shape: Soil conditions: Drainage: Utilities: Electricity / Gas: Water / Sanitary Sewer: Off -Site Improvements: Street/Cu rb-g utter: Sidewalk: Visual Road Condition: Street Lights / Alley: Storm Sewer: Access to site (#) / Frontage Traffic Count: Visibility: Flood hazard zone Apparent Easements: Encroachments: Unusual Conditions: Use: Land to Building ratio Excess/Surplus Land: Functional Adequacy: Surrounding Uses: Distance to Major Road Somewhat rectangular 357,628 SF (8.21 acres), per county, confirmed with aerial GIS measure 357,628 SF (8.21 acres) Mostly level / None noted Somewhat rectangular Assumed to be stable Appears adequate Yes / Yes Public water / Public sanitary sewer Asphalt / Concrete Concrete Dated Standard / None Yes 7th Street West (2), Interstate 94 entrance ramp (no direct access) The MnDOT traffic count map indicates 6,061 vehicles per day (in 2022) along 7th Street West and 48,369 vehicles per day (in 2022) along Interstate 94 Average The structure does not appear to be in the flood zone, see following map Typical utility and drainage assumed, there appear to be shared access easements with adjoining properties (assumed typical of the market) None apparent, no survey provided None noted Commercial n/a None noted Functional site N Commercial, a S Interstate 94 Commercial Future development land About 1 block east to Highway 25, about 0.15 miles south to 1-94 access The subject is located in the northwestern corner of the intersection of Highway 25 and Interstate 94. The surrounding uses include office, commercial, apartments, and the library. The subject site has average development appeal. The existing retaining wall along 7th Street West is failing; if not repaired, the subject parking lot could be impacted. No apparent adverse influences or easements noted or reported. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 27 ZONING MAP The subject is zoned CCD, Central Community District Legend Business Districts BASE ZONING DISTRICTS B-1 B 2 Residential Districts - B-3 -won Residential Densities - B-4 J A-O R-A GOD' , R-1 i Industrial DIsVlcts - Medium Resdental Densitas CIBc T-N 1.1 R-2 1.2 R-PUD [}p3 ADordanm Storage -High Residential Densties [MJ Al—n Ridge Villas - _ R-3 L�4J' Rivedown Suites _ R-4 [JDJ MinMlcello RV - [Jj] Desphaven -M-H L_T_1JT in Pines [MJ IIMc OTHER CM:j Ed—... Ritlge O Water CMj Nt— Truck end Equipment Addnioi PUD Districts r Slo,age linkMonicello 9E- [1Y7 smnv Brook Village [IQJS7River LjH_IMonticelloLakes C_M MoMdellu High School []]:)Hoglund Bus Park L33J Mills Fleet Farm E,20 Block 52 :M:j Red Roesler L'a:IC..," .ic Manor 2.d Adddw. _ spaeth Industrial Park L22-111aven Ridge ]nd Addition [SlEJ Camping M dtl Lam. ]Great River OVERLAY DISTRICTS _ spacial Use Overlay District t _ 1 Mississippi Mid, scenic & Red Overlay District - Moreland DlstdcP' J Freeway Bonus Sign District Floodplaln" Page 28 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ZONING Subject Zoning: CCD, Central Community District The purposes of the CCD, Central Community District, is to provide for a wide variety of land uses, transportation options, and public activities in the downtown Monticello area, and particularly to implement the goals, objectives, and specific directives of the Comprehensive Plan, and in particular, the 2017 Downtown Monticello "Small Area Plan" comprehensive Plan amendment and its design and performance standards. All proposed development or redevelopment in the CCD shall be Intent (city code): subject to the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and other standards identified in the Small Area Plan report. It is not the intent of this chapter to abrogate any general Zoning Ordinance requirements in the CCD, and all such requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance apply fully within the CCD unless addressed separately by a more detailed CCD zoning regulation. Projects that benefit from public investments and/or subsidies will have a greater burden to provide higher levels of both private and public amenities. Multi 3 du or under; townhouse; ground floor; commercial day care; Permitted Uses: professional office -services and retail; commercial office; financial; retail < 10,000 SF; retail with service; clinics/medical services; Single-family; multi 4-12 du; multi 13+ du; event centers; funeral Conditional Uses/Special services; personal services; places of public assembly; restaurants, Permit: bars <10,000 SF; restaurants, bars > 10,000 SF; retail sales > 10,000 SF; specialty eating establishments < 10,000 SF; veterinary facilities < 10,000 SF; public buildings or uses (incl. public parks); Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 29 Zoning — Continued Parking: Retail commercial uses in general: 1.0 space for each 200 SF, if in the CCD district, 1 space per 350 SF of floor space Minimum lot size: No minimum Maximum lot coverage: 40% (one story building) Major Restriction/ Minimum lot width: No minimum requirements in this district: Front vard setback: 8 feet Side vard setback: 0 feet Rear vard setback: 0 to 8 feet Maximum buildinq heiqht: 50 feet Use: The existing use appears to be allowed and permitted; if found otherwise, the value could differ. Source: Zoning map, city code Page 30 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 FUTURE LAND USE MAP 1 nilf'102 11.E The subject is guided for RC, Regional Commercial City of Monticello Boundary 0 Mixed Neighborhood (MN) L......... Monticello Orderly Annexation Area (MCAA) Mixed -Density Residential (MDR) 0 Parcels 0 Manufactured Home (MH) Streets 0 Downtown Mixed -Use (DMU) Railroad Community Commercial (CC) Water Bodies Regional Commercial (RC) t 0 Development Reserve (DR) 0 Commercial and Residential Flex (CRF) 0 Open Space and Resource Conservation (OSRC) Employment Campus (EC) City Parks and Recreation (PR) 0 Light Industrial Park (LIP) 0 Estate Residential (ER) General Industrial (GI) 0 Low -Density Residential (LDR) 0 Public and Institutional (P) 0 Traditional Residential (TR) 0 Xcel Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 31 Future Land Use Map — Continued The RC, Regional Commercial designation is described as the following in the city's comprehensive plan: ReWonaf Corrrmercil A Regional Commercial designation applies to areas targeted for uses that serve the traveling public and larger retail uses and commercial development intended for a regional market. This designation is generally applied to various areas along the Interstate 94 corridor with high visibility. The development character of the regional commercial development will continue to be auto -oriented, large format commercial uses such as 'big -box' uses and other uses that require a large parking area. Looking to the future, opportunities for connectivity and design linkages between such development and nearby uses and neighborhoods will be emphasized. The comprehensive plan also provides additional district characteristics for Regional Commercial: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) The Regional Commercial designation includes large-scale commercial uses serving a regional market, typically on large sites along the Interstate or major arterials madwayssuch as State Highway 2S. Retail uses within this category usually have large floor areas and high sales volumes and may he considered shopping "destinations" by consumers from the region. Uses such as furniture and electronic stores, farm supply, home improvement stores, department stores, "big box" retailers, hotels and restaurants are included. Smaller and more local -serving retail uses, and personal seances are generally not appropriate but could be allowed if complementary to a regional use. Commercial "Big Box" Stores Department Stores Hotels Restaurants Recreational Plaza Public Space Comprehensive Plan Conclusion: Primary Mode Vehicular with access to collectors and arterials Transit or shuttle service I Secondary Made shared bike/ pedestrian facilities Floor Area Ratio 2018 Correlating (FART Zoning District 0.30 to 0.50 B-3 Height- Highway 1-2 stories, 4 stories Business District for inor office B-4 Lot Area - Regional NIA Business District The subject is guided for a commercial use, which is consistent with the current zoning. Page 32 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Golf Course Rj Hope Evangelical t 4 At U Free Church u J wa r ti S-o uri River Montessori Charley C �1 41 h c n. M�+, E]I7tICf?�Ci ' 1V St. ,i - Ey h'LLLv,ry SLiSL�� 94 a F �� 8 • R,54µ515 , t I �1 I rl 1• .� A q - j m� V1 Chess 300yards innnh Ave SyA Google . - .._ . AERIAL / PLAT MAP -4L L OPP _ MP ft� �T llf or I 1 R ArmT 14 _SIR i - F -MEN • 7566L604,14}6 _ � , r 7 7 1 I r. --"- INN- The red outline reflects the subject gross site area, per county. Page 34 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 .�,� �, =� ! � `~�,' � � ��"' may, -•-. j �.- n. .•. s fly.. ,, \ " `• WEt�-p`NO MA? eot �s \ra�Gate d by f ' ,iVA oN webs\ke \he sub\ d map thathe Vert t\ar {or a\ yet\ands \n Ceary a vesouroe at�o ° pv�K n r \t \s a p \s a 9° ,F ap \s {ro�'�o we \and areas et\aod F\nde�d F\nde� t\a wet\ard m ere afe O\ e W\ \Ne {he abol \t appears th s {rom the \ �" ard, th N red a aboNje eXhbd �deCxoeat\on. Note. 0 \G\a\ I d researoh. beg�on\ng o{ w Page 36 SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Looking west on 7t" Street West Looking east on 7t" Street West View of building improvements (not appraised) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Site view Page 37 HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and best use is defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition as, "The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria that the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity". Highest and best use is analyzed in two ways, site as vacant and site as improved. Typically, there are four criteria in highest and best use analysis Legally permissible uses What uses are allowed by zoning? Physically possible uses What uses are physically possible on the site? Financially feasible use Which possible and permissible uses will produce a positive return? Maximally productive use Of the financially feasible uses, which use produces the highest return warranted by the market (the ideal improvements)? Site as Vacant: The use of the real estate based on the presumption that the parcel of land is vacant or can be made vacant by demolishing any improvements (i.e., as vacant or as if vacant). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 151' Edition, page 307) Legally Permissible Uses: The current CCD, Central Community District zoning allows primarily for a variety of commercial, office, and some residential uses. The subject is guided for RC, Regional Commercial which appears to be similar to the existing zoning. Physically Possible Uses: The subject site is somewhat rectangular, with a rectangular building pad area. Visibility and access to the property are rated average. The physical characteristics of the site appear suitable for development. The property has electricity, gas, public water, and public sanitary sewer available. Access to Interstate 94 is nearby, which is also appealing. The subject site has some visibility to 1-94. Financially Feasible Uses: Typically, surrounding uses, market demand, and availability of financing drive financially feasible uses. Surrounding Uses: Uses in the immediate area are commercial, apartments, and public. A commercial use would be supported. Financing: Current interest rates range from 7.50% to 8.50%+. Borrowers typically must be well qualified with 20% to 30% down. Financing for owner occupied properties (residential, commercial, industrial, and business) is rated to be average to good. Financing for multi -tenant commercial or office is rated to be average, however, most projects must be substantially pre - leased before lenders will extend financing. Market Demand: Market demand for commercial land in the subject area is soft to average. Any new construction would likely result in tenants/occupants that serve the immediate city or neighborhood. There is available development land within the city for new construction, including to the west of the subject. The subject is within commuting distance of the Metro area and attracts residential users (who require commercial services). Financially Feasible Uses: A commercial use is logical on the site. Given the location and overall size of the subject, development timing is likely 2+ years. Page 38 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Highest and Best Use — Continued Maximally Productive Use: The highest and best use as vacant is considered to be for a commercial building as market demand warrants and zoning allows. New construction generally results in average to good quality buildings. Based on the site size, the market would likely indicate a building of 55,000 SF to 80,000 SF Most Probable Buyer: Developer who would construct a single- or multi -occupant commercial building. Valuation Methodology: Commercial land sales will be considered to value the subject. Site as Improved: The use that should be made of the real estate as it exists (i.e., as currently improved or as if improved as proposed). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 307) The subject is improved with a single -occupant commercial building. This is similar to the highest and best use, as -if vacant. Given the scope of the assignment and acquisition area, this analysis is not applicable. However, a continued commercial use is logical. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 39 C�Z��+ • ... �ZT�1 The subject is being appraised as vacant land; therefore, the Cost Approach is not considered applicable and was not applied. INCOME APPROACH The Income Approach was not applied as rental and capitalization rate data for land like the subject is limited, which renders the approach unreliable. Page 40 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SALES COMPARISON APPROACH In the sales comparison approach, an opinion of market value is developed by comparing properties similar to the subject property that have recently sold, are listed for sale, or are under contract (i.e., for which purchase offers and a deposit have been recently submitted). A major premise of the sales comparison approach is that an opinion of the market value of a property can be supported by studying the market's reaction to comparable and competitive properties. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 351) Supply and Demand: Property prices result from negotiations between buyers and sellers. In a market with many buyers and sellers, buyers make up the market demand the properties offered for sale or lease currently or in the foreseeable future make up the supply. To estimate demand, appraisers consider the number of potential users of a particular type of property, their purchasing power, and their tastes and preferences. To analyze supply, appraisers focus on existing properties that are available on the market as well as properties that are being constructed, converted, or planned. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Substitution: The principle of substation holds that the value of property tends to be set by the cost of acquiring a substitute or alternative property of similar utility and desirability within a reasonable amount of time. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Balance: The forces of supply and demand tend toward equilibrium, or balance, in the market, but absolute equilibrium is almost never attained. Due to shifts in population, purchasing power, consumer tastes and preferences, and many other factors, demand varies greatly over time. The construction of new buildings, conversion of existing buildings to other uses, and demolition of old buildings cause supply to vary as well. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Externalities: External forces affect all types of property in positive or negative ways. Periods of economic growth and economic decline influence property values. Appraisers analyze the market area of the subject property to identify all significant external influences. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 151h Edition, page 353) When possible, select comparables with similar location, economic conditions and support facilities. Land Value: "Sales comparison is usually the preferred method for developing an opinion of site value. When this method is used, most of the techniques for selecting comparable sales and making adjustments that are described in Chapter 20 can be applied to site valuation. When there are not enough sales of similar parcels for the application of sales comparison, alternative methods such as market extraction, allocation, land residual analysis, and various income capitalization techniques may be used". (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 151h Edition, page 339) The Following Outline Is Used In The Sales Comparison Approach: - A location map of the comparable sales. - Comparable sales are listed. - An adjustment grid using the comparable sales. - A discussion of adjustment and conclusion of value. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 41 Comparable Location Map Primary Comparable Selection/Search Criteria: • Primary emphasis on commercial and apartment (possibly allowed by zoning) land sales • Sale date of January 1, 2020 +, older sales may be considered • 50,000 SF to 500,000 SF + • Data from competing communities • In some instances, older data and/or data from competing communities will be utilized due to proximity to the subject and other characteristics similar to the subject. Tot Lot Becker 24 10 w ralliunil 'l 5 E R B U R N E 5 4 5 a Mrs Q p a 1 •* tiq Land Sale 4 rgicello 39 Land Sale I Land Sale 5 JP y rr 37 A PulasW � Lake 1 Lanae d Sl2 ~ Meadows Pa � / t J M I N N E S O T _ BiO Lake 77 d C*ehus Me orial o ^eY Batley d 13 s rpl sA p a � 0 Riv s E e Elk Piper Com on rkr-, ■ a ,� o Otsego [ ISle- 101 Point I- r 9 42 Towne r Lakes { Park p " rips ti Land Sale 3 a Alb f r 30 Sh ow 241 � W d Park St. Michael - t3 194 erring Mill ■ 19 Crow -Hassan � y 35 County Park Syluan Rog s ae y Page 42 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sale Comparison Approach — Continued Sale Comparable 1 Aerial Image Address: XXXX Deegan Avenue, Monticello The land sale is indicated by the red arrow. Surrounding uses include a movie theater, Walmart, and other commercial. In the greater area is future development land and single-family residential. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 43 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Propertv Data Address: PID/Legal Description Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #1 1 XXXX Deegan Avenue, Monticello 155-176-001020 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 117,612 SF Improvements: None Slightly smaller commercial land parcel located along Highway 25. The property is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. Access to the site is via a backage road (no direct access to Highway 25). $930,440 July 21, 2021 Daniel Thomas Robbins City of Monticello Price /Acre Sale Terms Sale Conditions: Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $7.91 per SF Cash Typical RediComps, CoStar / CREV Page 44 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 195011" Me w' 1981h pve Nw i° 5� ti 9�i Ave NWV` 11-S- Bank Branch ti It �if ShopY�IALDi r3 Nye; qoTheNDhle.4ullier '4 Wilt shpp q I r". r 1 w Ori -Academy r —10 t r OI z 0 pye NW'1198th'�+'e May t r no" ' N _ Elk River m oavidso'fdea_�Q 7tam ,0b, 9.. a Sy�2y� i 6jh 44 MW 196th lrr Nw + M + Culver's VA—fl— • 5 R' �2 �aVP, f 7. - 4 3a .79S1h4��k' -- 2�- M1g5_,hpVe�w r �+ Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #2 Propertv Data Address: 19645 Evans Street Northwest, Elk River PID/Legal Description: 75-00769-0105 Description: Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Physical Characteristics: Average Utilities: Public Site Size: 172,497 SF Improvements: None Mostly rectangular parcel of land that has average development appeal. The eastern and Comments: northern portions of the site are wooded. The property has less visibility as compared to the subject. Sale Data Sale Price: $837,048 Price /Acre: $4.85 per SF Sale/Close Date: July 15, 2022 Sale Terms: Cash Buyer: Kostreba Holdings LLC Sale Conditions: Typical Seller: Comments: Zylstra Properties LLC Source/Verification: RediComps / CREV The property was listed on the open market. Page 46 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 cam �TamisDaycar&, . *. Kali Ave NEf 16I �« �az z r >y � >v a � x n s Iz - z •� i4+ ' w I NE 53rd SINE �m r ° 53rdSt NE •: .4 •�r� The Goddard`Sehac _ 5 of �Ihertvilfe • R1 � rI'" ,r � � x : r z 1 Al , aj m IPei Nation Veterinary • Care Cenfe r 3 x ro &Thel-io•:; S7S7r C a • 5_mnyoays T'ierap�,•-� � e Orihc:ic Pa-kmay To:o:iy Service z rt0 Powers We :`51ti�GaC"L. L�.`. � .� pint Po Jason Ave NE 50Ih St NE r Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Property Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #3 9 Four Seasons Park 5292 Kyler Avenue Northeast, Albertville 101137001010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 61,463 SF Improvements: None Smaller commercial land parcel located along County Road 19 (Labeaux Avenue Northeast). The property is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. Access to the site is via a backage road (no direct access to County Road 19). $449,000 January 12, 2024 Ortiz Properties LLC Price /Acre Sale Terms Sale Conditions: Cheney Properties, LLC Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $7.31 per SF Financing Typical RediComps, MLS / CREV Page 48 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sale Comparison Approach — Continued mane I' sale is indicated by Mu ' ,v ricultur6i IW The land and a9 le-fam►ly residential, townhom es sing I, The site is located along Highway 10. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 49 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #4 B'ao'rs y Land Sale 4 10 wns Park erLake gig Lake M ossn Par I Property Data Address: 90 Lakeshore Drive, Big Lake 65-124-4105 PID/Legal Description: Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Description: Average Utilities: Public Physical Characteristics: 69,696 SF Improvements: None Site Size: Smaller commercial site that has average development appeal. The property was purchased Comments: for the development of a Dollar General. The site has frontage and visibility along Highway 10. Sale Data Sale Price: $360,000 Price /Acre: $5.17 per SF Sale/Close Date: December 8, 2023 Sale Terms: Financing Buyer: DGCOGBIGLAKEMN06142023 Sale Conditions: Typical LL Seller: Medved & Nelson Source/Verification: RediComps, MLS / CREV Comments: The property was listed on the open market. Page 50 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 eep to WCCA WI i c ,r ' - Transmission'&•R - Due North Car ' Jensen Precision ~ Machi 'i ' 1Niha Tool's ! Martie's Farm Services UYendas�Rd - -- I `c a. ALDI ucai ALD • Great C n. B ffalcWildl"linos •� �BC•GD F.�ez EVG,L�i�0;I Iae K.W DI. • -� `CjG h1Dnt;CNIO Wal, ,art Sapercenter 16. ct Oslund Seamless. Gutters LLC' a `Le9 Cr ; Kjellberg Ct -Ne'li erg P-er SERof : ' rw}Inn— tive� V P[O s Wright County Theln�Well` Au oluti❑ } 3 Harrod Palnti'e 7 f Dent RI i,:� ��Eagle Ridge Ln I J nstea6QT L . m a° w, l C H OFs • y • U ® SctoolOvid Sc1aclBlvd ` sChocl al';8 �. I Pe661ebrcckBr p ym Works' • Q ' Cry z di QM `arClr �' clt¢ Diamond Or. Ccl;CleS, .. �'ti Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Propertv Data Address: PID/Legal Description Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #5 14 XXXX Edmonson Avenue Northeast, Monticello 155-269-001010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Apartments Average Utilities: Public 467,398 SF Improvements: None Larger development land site that was zoned for a PUD use. The buyer purchased to develop apartments. The subject's existing zoning would allow for some apartments; this sale captures the apartment potential. $2,100,000 March 20, 2023 Price /Acre Sale Terms Monticello Lakes, LLC Sale Conditions: Monticello Lake Apartments, LLC Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $4.49 per SF Cash Typical RediComps / CREV Page 52 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 r ~� ti - I • ice ` Ryar: Au'+-c Mall n� Chrvsler•i]odge Jeep.., V fvlacn Mot • sports "olorcyce.dezler a R a e; Me,,, ► �� _IpleH ! fir CA 9L. 7qa Zf �r y- �I I►� ifpt s q\ �'tt�►til� alarm; ' Gr'e� cis ��t��, ►4S Rd.; Ih: r►y` Oil �. �. •' /1 Open Road R, L! 1/• �Ra� tl�a e r Iy Pd4 _ boy. � , •r �// � �. � ParkPfDr_ o. L5 '0 � .. WestonD� T ' 0 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Propertv Data Address: PID/Legal Description Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #6 3810 Chelsea Road West, Monticello 155-253-000010, 155-125-000040 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 251,225 SF Improvements: None Commercial land that is similar in size to the subject property. The site has less visibility as compared to the subject; the location is rated to be inferior. The property was purchased for the development of a mini -storage. $940,869 August 26, 2021 StorageLink of St. Cloud Hwy 15, LLC Ocello, LLC Price /Acre Sale Terms Sale Conditions: Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $3.75 per SF Financing Typical RediComps / CREV Page 54 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Listed below is the adjustment grid for the comparables listed on the previous pages. Comparable items of significant difference are adjusted for. Description Subject 1 2 3 4 5 6 300 )000( 19645 5292 90 )000( 3810 Address 7th Street West Deegan Avenue Evans Street NW Kyler Avenue NE Lakeshore Drive Edmonson Ave NE Cheslea Road W Monticello Monticello Elk River Albertville Big Lake Monticello Monticello Proximity Subject 1.04 mi S 11.8 mi NE 8.31 mi SE 3.03 mi NE 1 mi S 0.63 mi SW (Financing Market Cash Cash Financing Financing Cash Financing (Conditions Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Market Conditions Jul-21 Jul-22 Jan-24 Dec-23 Mar-23 Aug-21 (Location Average Average Less Visible Average Fair/Average Fair/Average Fair (Zoning/Use Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Apartments Commercial Phys Char Average Average Average Average Average Average Average (Improvements n/a None None None None None None Size — — — — — Age — — — — — Condition — — — — — Utilities Public Public Public Public Public Public Public (Sale Price $930,440 $837,048 $449,000 $360,000 $2,100,000 $940,869 Site Size (SF) 357,628 117,612 172,497 61,463 69,696 467,398 251,225 Price per SF - Site Size $7.91 $4.85 $7.31 $5.17 $4.49 $3.75 Cond. Adj. +/- (Financing Market (Conditions Typical Market Conditions — 5.06% 3.09% 0.11 % 0.30% 1.73% 4.87% Net Cond. Adj. 5.06% 3.09% 0.11% 0.30% 1.73% 4.87% Effective $/SF - Site Size $8.31 $5.00 $7.31 $5.18 $4.57 $3.93 Adjustments +/- (Location Average 10% 10% 10% 20% (Zoning/Use Commercial �Phys Char Average (Improvements n/a Utilities Public Site Size (SF) 357,628 -10% -10% Net Adjustment 0% 10% -10% 0% 10% 20% Adjusted Price per SF -Site Size $8.31 $5.50 $6.58 $5.18 $5.03 $4.71 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 55 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Discussion of Adjustments Property Rights: Refers to the ownership interest conveyed at the time of sale. Properties with leases or other encumbrances in place can sell for more or less than comparable properties that sell fee simple interest. • All transactions were fee simple, no adjustment warranted. Financing: The impact financing may have had on the sale price, favorable interest rate or term. • All sales were cash or estimated to be near or at market rates. Conditions of sale: Reflects non -market conditions, which may or may not have impacted the sale price, such as differing motivations of buyer or seller (related parties, distressed or liquidation sale, listings, pending, occupancy, assemblage, etc.), impending eminent domain proceedings, influence due to tax ramifications, or lack of market exposure. • All transactions appear to be typical transactions, no adjustment warranted. Market Conditions: Based on a variety of data, the appraiser concludes to an annual appreciation rate of 2%. This rate is applied accordingly to the sales comparables. Location: This adjustment is based on the appraiser's judgment. It takes into consideration surrounding land uses, intended use, neighborhood characteristics, traffic, exposure and access. • Comparable 1 adjusted for less visibility. • Comparable 4 adjusted for less surrounding commercial development. • Comparable 5 adjusted for less surrounding commercial development. • Comparable 6 adjusted for less visibility and overall inferior location. Zoning/Use: • The comparables are rated similar to the subject, no adjustment. Physical Characteristics: Shape and topography adjustments reflect the market preference for mostly rectangular and level parcels, which optimize development potential. • The comparables are rated similar to the subject, no adjustment. Page 56 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Improvements: The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Utilities: • The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Site Size: Adjustments recognize larger parcels of land typically sell for less per SF than smaller sites. Comparables adjusted accordingly. • The adjustment is based on discussions with market participants as well as previously observed sales. Conclusion: The comparables used are rated to be the most indicative of data analyzed and bracket the subject value. Other sales reviewed were older, further and/or needed more adjustment. Adjustments are made on a per SF basis. The comparables utilized in this analysis each have several similar characteristics in common with the subject. While none are totally identical to the subject, each represents a viable alternative to a prospective buyer of the subject property and, after adjustment, can be utilized as an indicator of market value for the subject property. Indicator Un-adiusted Price per SF Range $3.75 - $7.91 Average $5.58 Median $5.01 Adiusted Price per SF $4.71 - $8.31 $5.89 $5.34 Primary emphasis is given to Sales 1, 5, and 6 which are located in Monticello. These sales have an adjusted average price per SF of $6.02. Considering the above data, the subject location, characteristics, quality, and the current market conditions, a value near the upper range is considered appropriate. Site Size (SF) Value per SF Total 357,628 $7.25 $2,592,803 Indicated Value (land only) $2,595,000 (rnd.) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 57 RECONCILIATION Cost Approach Not Applied Sales Comparison Approach $2,595,000 Income Approach Not Applied The Cost Approach to value was not applied as the subject is being appraised as vacant land. The Direct Sales Comparison Approach to value analyzed recent sales of properties as compared with the characteristics of the subject property. Adjustments were made to the comparables to make them as similar to the subject as possible. This results in an indication of market value at which a typical buyer would be willing to pay for the subject property. Quality and quantity of data rated to be average. The Income Approach was not utilized due to limited rents and capitalization rates of properties similar to the subject. Conclusion: The Sales Comparison Approach is given the most weight. Data quantity and quality was rated to be average. Final Value Opinion (BEFORE) The value opinion is: $2,595,000 EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME Reasonable Exposure Time: Typically 6 to 12 months Marketing Time Opinion: 6 to 12 months +/- after the before the effective date of the appraisal. effective date of the appraisal. Page 58 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 AFTER ANALYSIS The neighborhood, site, regional, aerial, comparables, etc. descriptions are the same in the before as the after (unless otherwise noted on the following pages). The highest and best use of the site as vacant is for commercial development as market demand warrants and zoning allows. The highest and best use of the site as improved is not applicable. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 59 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Monticello is proposing to replace a failing retaining wall along 7t" Street West. The retaining wall is used to support adjoining parking lots and allow for a concrete sidewalk. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring temporary easements. Description of the acquisition areas and types: Right-of-Wav Acquisition (ROW): Used for right of way related purposes (road construction, ponding, etc.). The city will acquire this area in fee; the property owner does not retain any ownership rights. The city reported the following ROW for the project. Site Size — Before 357,628 SF Acquisition Area — ROW 0 SF Site Size - After 357,628 SF Permanent Easement: The easement area is used for trail, drainage, and utility purposes. The subject owner remains the underlying owner of the area. The city reports the following for permanent easement area: Total Permanent Easement None Temporary Easement: Used for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. A market rate of return will be found for the time period that the temporary easement exists. Because the owner retains ownership of the temporary easement area, it is not applicable to subtract it as a loss from the "Before" site size. For the specific subject parcel, it appears that the sloping after the project will be similar to the sloping before the project with minimal changes. However, because changes can occur during actual construction, the appraiser reserves the right to reconsider damages if the slope exceeds 1 to 4 in the after condition. The temporary easement length is anticipated to last 18 months. Temporary Easement 10,853 SF Page 60 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SKETCH OF ACQUISITION e Ecat l2 ,est- f Let 2. 1. KIRKMAN PD0111110N f \II \f 1 N Temporary Easement Exhibit — — — — — — — — — — — ---------� 7TH STREET ;t ►�� t��=��iii�i�i i=i� i�i' � i wm-, Saeeh Ilne of the Nw'th 40.00 -rc'el of LW DI fllock 1, RKunN noolnan PIO W. 155-060- 01020 \-'� PROPn1 Ff1 TFMPnRARY FAWMFNT n]F .RIPMON A —pprpry eeeem f« con elruetlpe pupoeee over and ...... the North 40.00 ,eel, the Eoer 150.00 feet p, Lot 2. Olock 1. -d the N«th 4000 feet pf OUEat C. boM belnq i, KIRKMAN A00IT0N, .11 C-11 mnneeote, Ar of Proposed Temp« E,x t = 10,055 e0. N. 0.25 o«es L_ Imo:_ `1� vC / SwM Ilne pf SKe NonM1 LPL-� n K.N. AMITONo1 J CIvTIL.CT .. A� i no N0. 155-068-WWW C� / F A A I I ^ 3 J&R li, LLO IVIr\L_L_ A rti rti1T 1%1n I \UL) �m I ® �me Rupvss6TL nb " '•,••• ':,•' ,:,, Hakansan Epsemem UNbl, � `ey�,�- �.w ■ ��Anderson f« OF MONTICLLLO The new temporary easement area is shown in the cross -hatched area. The city indicates the temporary easement is 10,853 SF. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 61 Sketch of Acquisition — continued ' 7TM ST W. 5068080626 � r, _ fut � f�. r1n 1TE 41; � ,'i501id Uf1l lr Jul I y 15501 UUU 4U 1 11�i802011— . 155 760 , 1 15�R The red outline above reflects the subject property. The dashed yellow outline reflects the approximate temporary easement area. Page 62 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA Temporary Easement Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Temporary Easement Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 63 Photographs of Acquisition Area — Continued Temporary Easement Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Temporary Easement Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Page 64 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE Potential aspects of damage or loss in value to the subject property caused by the partial acquisition: Land within the acquired area Buildings located within the acquired area Site improvements within the acquired area Severance damage, the influence of the acquisition area on the subject property Project Influence Land - Land value breakdown -- On the basis that all portions of the subject site have equal value contribution the subject's land value in the taking area is diminished by the pro -rated value of the land acquired. Buildings — There are no building improvements in the acquisition area. Site improvements — Based on an inspection, see below chart for site improvements, if any, that are impacted by the acquisition. The city will move and/or replace in kind any wells, septic systems, underground watering systems, and fences as needed. Site Improvements Description Type/Size/Condition Quantity/Rate Total Opinion of Market Value Trees None $0 Plantings None $0 Other None $0 It is assumed the city will replace any asphalt or Driveway/Fence concrete in like manner; if found otherwise, the $0 appraised value could differ Underground Watering System None $0 Sign None $0 TOTAL $0 Note: The city is to maintain access to the subject during the project period. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 65 Aspects of Potential Damage — continued Severance damage — Given the current site layout and use, there is no severance damage to the remainder as a result of the acquisition. It is the appraiser's opinion the proposed acquisition as described in this report will not have an adverse effect on the marketability or value of the remainder due to the acquisition. See chart below. Primary Factors Considered for Estimating Potential Severance Site Characteristics Before After Net Impact Location Average Average Nil Access Average Average Nil Street Improvements Dated Dated Nil Trail None None Nil Ponding None None Nil Utilities Public Public Nil Elevation Average Average Nil Drainage Average Average Nil Retaining Wall Fair, failing New Benefit not considered Sound Wall None None Nil Fence None None Nil House/Building Proximity n/a n/a Nil to Road/ROW, approximate Site / Development Appeal Average Average Nil Highest and Best Use Commercial Commercial Nil *Appraised value does not give consideration to any benefit to the subject as result of the proposed project. Severance Discussion: Based on the above chart analysis, there is no severance damage to the remainder. The highest and best use of the subject in the before and the after is considered to be the same. Project Influence - The subject will have reasonable and suitable access throughout the project. The proposed project is considered typical. An informed buyer/property owner is aware that any property is subject to occasional disturbances due to various projects over the course of time; such as road upgrades, utility improvements, other infrastructure maintenance, construction/razing of buildings, renovations to the noted property, etc. Note: The temporary easement area will encumber 23 parking stalls. Based on aerial images and viewing the site multiple times, the encumbered parking stalls are generally vacant (they are approximately 272' from the building entrance). It appears that most customers park closer to the building. The city indicated that the parking stalls will be closed for two weeks during construction. For all other times of the temporary easement the parking stalls will be open. In addition, during the entire temporary easement, the access points and drive lanes encumbered by the temporary easement will be open. To calculate the loss of the parking stalls, the appraiser concluded to a rental rate of $30 per month per stall. The city indicated that the stalls would be closed for two weeks for construction. In order to account for delays, the appraiser estimates four weeks of closure. Therefore, the total parking stall rent is $30 x 23 parking stalls = $690. This amount is applied as an additional temporary easement cost. Page 66 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES ROW Acquisition: Acquired for road purposes. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 100% loss in value. The new ROW area is reported to be 0 SF. Permanent Easement Acquisition: The easement area is used for trail, drainage, and utility purposes. The new easement area is reported to be 0 SF. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 95% loss in value. Temporary Easement: Used by the city for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. The city reports that the temporary easement will be 10,853 SF. ur-r.-ary of Acnu_ tip imate of Value :e s+� quiscion ii # * met Land Value � � 0 or 2,5!i: ,C 0 Site Irnproverr?r s ota�/aNe BEFOPAc{si -+. = it S- t -0- 0 Sal 0 2,52 D-j0 "ic ate 4 V lue Aftga4cr;Ai y -ota✓a •e Befo a Acn si- 2 r+Q► -)0 ess --�O\- Accuisition� ::1reE.:riptive E- � n- - ! ! ■ ■ Perms --rea+E = n---it r • ■ r 7 i1 i r i mull r I � _ .I k--- 1F--Acqur— s. W en ir up * 1! Z i J ? 2 = loon in • oil .2 AG -a ,N—v t Z—Ws ilr r � ilr � 7 e � ■ t oum a) IL — t 7 -P )e! 3F 7 �—aer SF a s • • r r +r s r �- ic e -0 7o I�� rr r ■r Z0 00 INV s , r tr- �- = iL-o- ''2 lb -&I -pc.— tase- ,� MIN i ■r • ■ �! ■IIIII�IIII�� It nate Computation ROW Acqusition Area !� �F } 7 5 .E 3F k a�%G hts ems= $0 Prescriptive Easemen!- O '3 aE3Fx•!0°r:%hts Y s= $0 ermanent Easement _ � ■ � u j x= 7 5 we=3F x- •moo g t ICE _ $0 ' Site Improvements } ti $0 Severance mT�$0 Temporary Easement �10,817x$7.2---7)erSF),---O%x18months7—= $;.1,8!3+-Darkig ($�,493) Total (round&-) $12,500 *Slight deviations may exist due to rounding. EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME Reasonable Exposure Time: 6 to 12 months Marketing Time Opinion: 6 to 12 months +/- after before the effective date of the appraisal. the effective date of the appraisal. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 67 DEFINITIONS MARKET VALUE - The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (A) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (B) both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (C) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market, (D) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (E) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — The right to use another's land for a stated purpose. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — An interest in real property that conveys use but not ownership to a portion of a property. Common easements include but are not limited to access, utility, and right of way. Specialty easements include but are not limited to conservation, preservation, aerial, and flowage. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute TEMPORARY EASEMENT (definition) — An easement granted for a specific purpose and applicable for a specific time period. A construction easement, for example, is terminated after the construction of the improvement and the unencumbered fee interest in the land reverts to the owner. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute Page 68 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES Regarding any adverse environmental and/or improvement structural conditions (such as, but not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, mold, construction defects or inadequacies, etc.) present in the improvements, on the site, or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: None are apparent, however, appraiser is not an expert in this field. Value assumes no hazardous or structural conditions exist. Value assumes any abandoned wells will be properly sealed. If any of these conditions exist the appraised value could differ significantly. EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS As stated by USPAP; Extraordinary Assumption: An assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions of conclusions. None Hypothetical Condition: That which is contrary to what exists but is supposed for the purpose of analysis. Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 69 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. The appraisers assume no responsibility for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor do the appraisers render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership and good management. 2. The furnished legal description is assumed to be correct. 3. Any sketch in the report may show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraisers have made no survey of the property. It is assumed unless otherwise noted that no survey has been viewed and that all improvements are located within the legally described property. 4. The appraisers are not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made the appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. 5. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of value for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 6. The appraisers assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraisers assume no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering, which might be required to discover such factors. 7. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, radon gas, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 8. Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the appraisers, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, the appraisers can assume no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished to the appraisers. 9. Disclosure of the contents of the appraisal report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which the appraisers are affiliated. No part of the contents of this report, or copy thereof (including conclusions as to the property value, the identity of the appraiser, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organizations, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected), shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or any other public means of communications without the prior written consent and approval of the appraisers. Page 70 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Assumptions & Limiting Conditions — continued 10. The appraisers have no present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised; and neither the employment to make the appraisal, nor the compensation for it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property. The appraisers have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. 11. The appraiser has personally inspected the subject site (unless noted otherwise). The comparable sales data has been viewed via aerial maps, photographs and/or online street views along with file pictures, when available. To the best of the appraiser's knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this report are true and correct, and the appraisers have not knowingly withheld any significant information. 12. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The appraisal is for the sole use of the named client. 13. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of the property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider possible non-compliance with the requirements of ADA in estimating the value of the property. 14. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the reported analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report was prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 15. The appraised value opinion assumes all leases (if any) are current and paid in full as of the effective date of the appraisal. 16. Excel grids and tables may have slight deviations due to rounding, which may have a nominal impact on value. 17. The appraised value opinion assumes all formulas used in the Excel grids throughout the report are accurate. 18. Unless noted, value assumes no apparent adverse site, building or zoning issues or conditions. 19. Site and building sizes are based on public record, data services, client and/or appraiser measurement at the time of appraisal and are considered reliable, but not guaranteed. Actual sizes herein could vary if made by an engineer/surveyor/contractor. 20. If any of the above if found to be different, value could change. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 71 CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1) The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2) The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions. 3) 1 have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4) 1 have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5) My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6) My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7) My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8) The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Appraisal Institute's Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, which includes the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice. 9) Erin Waytas has made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. Erin Waytas did not inspect the subject property. Ethan Waytas wrote and selected all the data in the report. Erin Waytas read the report, concurred with the findings, and then co -signed the report. 10) No one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. 11) In accordance with the competency provision USPAP, I have verified that my knowledge, experience and education are sufficient to allow me to competently complete this appraisal. See attached qualifications. 12) As of the date of this report, Erin Waytas and Ethan Waytas have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the appraisal institute. 13) The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representative. 14) We have provided services (one restricted appraisal report regarding retaining wall benefit) as an appraiser regarding the subject property within the 3-year period immediately preceding acceptance to this assignment. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: see report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: see report Page 72 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER hereby certify: have personally inspected the property herein appraised and that I have previously afforded the property owner the opportunity to accompany me during an inspection. Such opportunity was afforded to the owner/representative and said individual did not accompany me on the inspection. That to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements contained in the appraisal herein above set forth are true and the information upon which the opinions expressed therein are based as correct; subject to the limiting conditions herein set forth. That I understand that such appraisal is to be used in connection with an acquisition, and that such appraisal has been made in conformity with the appropriate State laws, regulations, policies and procedures applicable to appraisal of such purposes and that to the best of my knowledge no portion of the value assigned to such property consists of items which are non-compensable under the established State law. That in making this appraisal I have disregarded any increase or decrease in the before value caused by the project for which the property is being acquired. That neither my employment nor the compensation for making this appraisal and report are in any way contingent upon the value reported herein. That I have no direct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition of such property appraised. That I will not reveal the findings and results of such appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of the acquiring agency until authorized by agency officials to do so, or until I am required to do so, by due process of law, or until I am released from this obligation by having publicly testified as to such findings. That the conclusion set forth in this appraisal was reached without collaboration or direction as to value. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: See Report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: See Report Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 73 QUALIFICATIONS Appraisal Experience Presently and since 2006, Ethan Wavtas, MAI has been employed as an employee of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (10 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. He is currently a full time licensed certified general real estate appraiser, partner, and director of the company's IT department. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, cinema, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, Lakeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO, subdivisions, and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Tax Appeal — variety of property types, including commercial, industrial, and multi -family. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Testimony -- Court, commission, arbitration, mediation, etc. testimony has been given Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #40368613 Holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute Education -- Graduate of the University of Minnesota: College of Science and Engineering, Twin Cities Campus Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, with distinction, 3.86 GPA. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Basic Appraisal Procedures -- Basic Appraisal Principles -- 2012-2013 15-Hour National Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice -- General Appraiser Sales Comparison Approach -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 1 -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 2 -- Advanced Income Capitalization -- General Appraiser Report Writing and Case Studies -- Real Estate Finance, Statistics and Valuation Modeling -- 2014-2015 7-hour National USPAP Update Course -- General Appraiser Site Valuation & Cost Approach -- Advanced Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use -- Advanced Concepts & Case Studies -- Quantitative Analysis Page 74 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Appraisal Experience Presently and since 1985, William R. Waytas has been employed as a full-time real estate appraiser. Currently a partner and President of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (11 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. Mr. Waytas was employed with Iver C. Johnson & Company, Ltd., Phoenix, AZ from 1985 to 1987. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, hotel, hotel water park, bed & breakfast, cinema, marina, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, /akeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Review — residential, commercial and land development. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - most appraisal experience is in the greater Twin Cities Metro Area (typically an hour from downtown metro). Numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #4000813. Appraisal Institute: SRA, Senior Residential Appraiser Designation, General Associate Member Employee Relocation Council: CRP Certified Relocation Professional Designation. International Right -Of -Way Association: Member HUD/FHA: On Lender Selection Roster and Review Appraiser DNR: Approved appraiser for Department of Natural Resources Testimony -- Court, deposition, commission, arbitration & administrative testimony given. Mediator -- Court appointed in Wright County. Committees -- President of Metro/Minnesota Chapter, 2002, Appraisal Institute. -- Chairman of Residential Admissions, Metro/MN Chapter, Al. -- Chairman Residential Candidate Guidance, Metro/Minnesota Chapter, Al. -- Elm Creek Watershed Commission, Medina representative 3 years. -- Medina Park Commission, 3 years. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 75 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Education -- Graduate of Bemidji State University, Minnesota. B.S. degree in Bus. Ad. -- During college, summer employment in building trades (residential and commercial). -- Graduate of Cecil Lawter Real Estate School. Past Arizona Real Estate License. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Course 101-Introduction to Appraising Real Property. -- Numerous Standards of Professional Practice Seminar. -- Fair Lending Seminar. -- Eminent Domain & Condemnation Appraising. -- Eminent Domain (An In -Depth Analysis) -- Property Tax Appeal -- Eminent Domain -- Business Practices and Ethics -- Scope of Work -- Construction Disturbances and Temporary Loss of Going Concern -- Uniform Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book Seminar) -- Partial Interest Valuation Divided (conservation easements, historic preservation easements, life estates, subsurface rights, access easements, air rights, water rights, transferable development rights) Commercial/Industrial/Subdivision Courses & Seminars -- Capitalization Theory & Techniques -- Highest & Best Use Seminar -- General & Residential State Certification Review Seminar -- Subdivision Analysis Seminar. -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (general) -- Advanced Income Capitalization Seminar -- Advanced Industrial Valuation -- Appraisal of Local Retail Properties -- Appraising Convenience Stores -- Analyzing Distressed Real Estate -- Evaluating Commercial Construction -- Fundamentals of Separating Real Property, Personal Property and Intangible Business Assets Residential Courses & Seminars -- Course 102-Applied Residential Appraising -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (residential) -- HUD Training session local office for FHA appraisals -- Familiar with HUD Handbook 4150.1 REV-1 & other material from local FHA office. -- Appraiser/Underwriter FHA Training -- Residential Property Construction and Inspection -- Numerous other continuing education seminars for state licensing & Al Speaking Engagements -- Bankers -- Auditors -- Assessors -- Relocation (Panel Discussion) Publications -- Real Estate Appraisal Practice (book): Acknowledgement -- Articles for Finance & Commerce and Minnesota Real Estate Journal Page 76 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 20. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of a new 40" Bobcat asphalt cold planer with dust control from Farm Rite Equipment for $33,034.01 and declaring the two 2002 Alitec cold planers as surplus Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Street Superintendent 2/26/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Public Works Director/City Engineer City Administrator ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the purchase of a new 40" Bobcat asphalt cold planer with dust control from Farm Rite Equipment for $33,034.01 and declare two 2002 Alitec cold planers as surplus. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The street department has an ongoing pavement management program that includes patching streets. A cold planer is an attachment for the skid loader used to mill asphalt prior to patching. On average, 60 tons of asphalt a year is replaced, therefore making this a very important and necessary tool for the pavement management program. The proposed asphalt planer replaces two 2002 Alitec CP16ATD cold planers. The planers are 22 years old and repair parts are currently unavailable. Staff requested quotes for a replacement and received four. The lowest quote, with state contract pricing, is Farm Rite Equipment for $33,034.01. Both Alitec cold planers will be declared surplus and sold at public auction. I. Budget Impact: $32,000 was budgeted in the Central Equipment Fund for this piece of equipment in the 2024 budget. Although the price is higher than what was budgeted, the balance of the Central Equipment Fund can accommodate the purchase. II. Staff Workload Impact: N/A III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends purchasing of the Bobcat 40" cold planer with dust control from Farm Rite Equipment and declaring the two Alitec cold planers as surplus and selling at public auction. SUPPORTING DATA • Quotes CITY OF MONTICELLO VERBAL/WRITTEN QUOTE SUMMARY SHEET Minimum 2 verbal or written quotes required for items/services costing at least $1,000 but less than $2,500. Minimum 3 written quotes required for items/services costing at least $2,500 but less than $10,000. No Quotes are required for items purchased through state cooperative purchasing venture. Use this form to summarize quotes received and to select vendor for award. Name: i 1'1 �-�- .r .�c.t� t� Dept: 51-rtt. I�t' i- Phone: 7G rp �,� �7 J Signature of Person Obtaining Quotes: /JI ! L ,/4 e Item/Service Requested: q0 (G 0 ), �LwNLjr, N Note: If you are unable to obtain required number of quotes, provide an explanation below in notes/comments. # Date Vendor Name Contact Person 1 �t,7 =r;•h F4,vr,.,\ 1� t �e- V 2 ;-G,,N 1�,i, Gv'$y 3 A3 5ctr ��• �'i J�C.�G.i lVVi 4 ;( 51zi L Pry 5 Phone Number 1 3:40 "t io �AUfS -7b� 0q WO Total $ Amount i Quoted 4,;3,35t), ec W. ciB SO� q #33,'410. EA ya. 1154 c351 6qo / 44- . to Selected Vendor: FLrw� �Z F `�� .1'v-�►� �' L�"; Z- (If ❑ou are selecting other than low Quote, you are required to provide written justification as to why low quote was not selected in the notes/comments section): Notes/comments: Approval Acknowledgement: Date: Attach this form and written quotes obtained to invoice. Questions may be directed to the Finance Department. Quote Summary Sheet 10/27/2015 *L— Bobcat. Product Quotation Quotation Number: HM314461 Quote Sent Date: Jan 27, 2024 Expiration Date: Feb 26, 2024 Your Bobcat Contact Heather Messmer Phone: 7012418719 E-mail: heather.messmer i:doosan.com Deliver to Bobcat Dealer Bill to CITY OF MONTICELLO Farm -Rite Equipment of St. Cloud, St. CITY OF MONTICELLO G8685 Cloud, MN 810 MAYHEW LAKE RD NE ST. CLOUD, MN, 56304 Item Name 40" Planer, High Flow Quick -Tack Water Kit Nozzle Spray Kit for 40" Planer Quick -Tack Stabilizer Mounting Kit Comment: Item Number Quantity Price Each 6726632 1 29,199.20 6813816 1 1,745.44 - 7113092 1 199.37 7152512 1 513.60 Total for 40" Planer, High Flow Quote Total - USD Dealer P.D.I. Freight Charges Destination Charges Dealer Assembly Charges Quote Total - USD Total 29,199.20 1,745.44 199.37 513.00 31,657.01 31,657.01 100.00 0.00 627.00 650.00 33,034.01 *Plus applicable taxes. IF Tax Exempt, please include Tax Exempt Certificate with the order. *Prices per the Sourcewell Contract # 040319-CEC. *Sourcewell Member Number (if applicable): *All orders should include 1) Accounts Payable Contact and email address, 2) W9 with correct Iegal entity name, and 3) Bill to Address. *Orders may be placed with the contract holder or authorized dealer as allowed by the terms and conditions of the contract. *A Copy of all orders must be provided to Heather.Messmer@Doosan.com. *Contact Holder Information: Clark Equipment Company dba Bobcat Company, Govt Sales, 250 E Beaton Drive, West Fargo, ND 58078. TID# 38-0425350. *Payment Terms: Net 60 Days. Credit cards accepted. *Remittance address: Clark Equipment Company d/b/a Bobcat Company, P. O. Box 74007382, Chicago, IL 60674-7382 *Questions can be submitted via email to randy.fuss@doosan.com or by phone at: 1-900-965-4232 Customer Acceptance: Quotation Number: iiM3wa Purchase Order: Authorized Signature: Print: Date: Addresses: Delivery Address: Billing Address (if different from ship to): Tax Exempt: Y 0 / N 0 Exempt in the State of - Tax Exempt ID: Federal: State: Expiration Date: Sign: Email: 2/2124, 11:35 AM Planer Attachment - Bobcat Company r r • Cut and mill concrete and asphalt • Much less expensive to maintain and more maneuverable than dedicated planers • Versatile and durable, delivering high torque for maximum cutting and milling performance • Easily set and maintain depth, width, and slope control • Choose from four different planer models • Super Flow available on select models Standard flow planer provides excellent performance on standard flow machines.allowing a lower initial investment for those that only need to use a planer periodically. High flow planers utilize the increased hydraulic horsepower. https://www.bobcat.com/na/en/attachments/planer 2/9 2/2/24, 11:35 AM Planer Attachment - Bobcat Company Home ► Attachments ► Planer Planer Attachment httDs://www.bobcat.com/na/en/attachments/nlaner 1 /0 Planer, Standard Planer, High Flow - Planer, High Flow - Planer, High Flow - Flow -14" 18" 24" 40" General Operating Weight 11071b 1191 Ib 1264lb 2300 lb Length 47.5 in 47.5 In 47.5 in 44 in Width 66.4 in 66.4 in 66.4 in fib in Height 29.3 in 35.2 in 35,2 In 32 in Cutting Depth Max 6 in 6 in 6 in 5 In Cutting Depth Min 0 in 0 in 0 in 0 in Drum Width Max 14 in 18 in 24 in 40 in Number of Wits nl a nl a n/ a 78 Sideshift 29.8 in 29.8 in 29.8 In 25.6 in Maximum Cutting Angle 15° 15' 15' 81 Pianing Distance Next to Curb 75.4 in 75.4 in 80.4 in 2.6 in Drum Diameter 17.8 in 17.8 in 17.8 in 14.5 in Flow Range Min 15 gall min 22 gall min 22 gaU min 25 gaU min Flow Range Max 27 gaU min 40 gaU min 40 gaU min 59 gaU min 02/02/2024 Page 1 2/2/24, 11:35 AM Planer Attachment - Bobcat Company Hydraulic Side Shift Top Tasks • Mate uneven pavement surfaces • Clean up around larger miller machines • Cut drainage in a parking lot • Mill around manholes • Taper edges on a roadway Super -Flow Planer Overview I Bobcat Attachments I Features How It works Carbide -tipped bits are mounted on a revolving drum to cut and pulverize pavement material. After material has been milled, it leaves the planer housing through a rear opening. Planer skis are used to adjust the angle and depth by moving the right and left ski up or down. Depth gauges are visible from the cab to provide a measurement reference of each ski depth. Bobcat planers have better visibility of the skis, so operators can easily control the path of the planer and the machine. Even on rough terrain, the planer skis maintain surface contact, resulting in a consistent cut depth. https:l/www.bobcat.com/na/en/attachments/planer grg Drum options Oscillation _ Replaceable Ski Wear Pads Steel Wheels Side Cutting Teeth Free -Floating Oscillation Hydraulic Side Shift Large Rear Opening Removable End Plate Visible Left Ski Top Access Panel Planer Drum Priority Valve Independently Adjustable Skis Diverter Valve Front Access Panel . City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 2P. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of a 2024 Cimline tack kettle trailer from Midstates Equipment for $27.100 and declaring the 2003 Stepp tack trailer as surplus Prepared by: Meeting Date: ❑x Consent Agenda Item Street Superintendent 2/26/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: PW Director/City Engineer City Administrator ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the purchase of a 2024 Cimline Tack Kettle trailer in the amount of $27,100 and declare the 2003 Stepp tack trailer as surplus. The proposed tack kettle trailer will replace the current 2003 Stepp 200-gallon tack trailer. Tack is used to increase the bond between pavement layers and the tack trailer will be used in patching and paving operations and other pavement management practices. Also included in the purchase is a 250-gallon tank equipped with an 8' spray bar and spray wand as well as an overnight heater. Staff requested quotes and received four responses. Midstates Equipment and Supply was the lowest quote at $27,100. The 2003 Stepp tack trailer will be declared surplus and sold at auction. I. Budget Impact: The 2024 budget includes $40,000 in the Central Equipment fund for this replacement. II. Staff Workload Impact: N/A III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approving the purchase of the replacement tack trailer and declaring the 2003 trailer as surplus. 411]Z111Ci1111VLc"I _tLl 0 Quotes CITY OF MONTICELLO VERBAL/WRITTEN QUOTE SUMMARY SHEET Minimum 2 verbal or written quotes required for items/services costing at least $1,000 but less than $2,500. Minimum 3 written quotes required for items/services costing at least $2,500 but less than $10,000. No Quotes are required for items purchased through state cooperative purchasing venture. Use this form to summarize quotes received and to select vendor for award. Name: m kf' I- 6'A lanDept: S Q- t3 IJ�� f . Phone: � 6 3 Signature of Person Obtaining Quotes: L Item/Service Requested: Ti'Of.- Tr4 c a - Note: If you are unable to obtain required number of quotes, provide an explanation below in notes/comments. # Date Vendor Name I Contact Person Phone Number Total $ Amount Quoted Merk- %or&1 - 0a ifs �55�5 prre' 2 It G�L d3 Y''ti Wr-, ,CS 3 SrEPP me6 Gait 4S1 G-?q qqq N3;15'A. 4 q1a+. Le-uritai '45tL&1V 76 597 Y930 �. rcpu%r G'AL 5 Selected Vendor: KZZ6-VC6 Gq0; Prn *J- (If you are selecting other than low quote, you are required to provide written justification as to why low quote was not selected in the notes/comments section): Notes/comments: Approval Acknowledgement: Date: Attach this form and written quotes obtained to invoice. Questions may be directed to the Finance Department. Quote Summary Sheet 10/27/2015 C(�l!IP11G\T �� S��WNII January 25, 2024 City of Monticello Attn: Mike Haaland Monticello, MN 55362 mflkehaaland@ci.monticello.mn.us Mile, 606 County Rd. #1 Mountain Lake, MN 56159 Tel. (507) 427-3807 Fax (507) 427-3709 Toll Free 1-800-929-3807 Thank you for the opportunity to quote equipment for your asphalt maintenance needs. I have listed the price for the equipment you are interested in. 1-2024 Clmline Tack Kettle. 250 Gallen. Prouane Heat. Gas Engine, Trailer Standard Unit with the following options: 8' Spray Bar System Upgrade K2 Overnight Heater Probe,150VAC, 150OW Boom* $25,600.00 + 1,500.00 27,100.00, Delivered *Cimline will draw up plan for the boom and have the City of Monticello approve the design before the boom is manufactured. Trade In: 1— Stepp Tack Sp...,..-750.00 TERMS: Owner agrees that all payments required under this Contract shall be due and payable within 30 days of date of invoice. Owner fiuther agrees that Midstates Equipment & Supply may charge interest at the annual rate of eighteen percent (18%), unless a lesser percentage is required by law on any sum due under this Contract which is not paid within 30 days of invoice date. If payments are not made when due, interest, costs incidental to collection and attorney's fees (if any attorney is retained for collection) shall be added to the unpaid balance. Midstates Equipment & Supply reserves the right, without penalty from Owner, to stop service or shipment if the Owner does not make payments to Midstates Equipment & Supply when due. This Proposal/Contract may be withdrawn by Midstates Equipment & Supply if not accepted within 30 days, or at anytime, subject to increases related to material prices as noted above. Acceptance of Proposal — The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. This proposal may be withdrawn if not accepted within 30 days. Date of Acceptance PO# Signature Signature If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, j�%vN %&- Jerry Dyke MIDSTATES EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY JVD ae City of Monticello - Cimline K2 - With Boom - 01252OU RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC Centerville, MN 612-378-9558 www.rieguip.com December 19, 2023 City of Monticello, PWD Monticello, MN We are pleased to provide the following 2024 budget number New 2024 Cimline Model TK250 tack trailer with: *250 gallon emulsion tank *Propane heat *Solvent tank *Waste tank *Honda gas engine, recoil start *Spray wand with valve *Pintle hitch Price FOB Centerville, MN .................... $24,500.00 Optional 8 foot folding manual spray bar, add $3100.00 Optional plug-in overnight heat.................add $1100.00 Price with options......................................$28,700.00 Less trade of 2004 Stepp tack wagon.....($2,000.00) Total price ................................................. $26,700.00 Any applicable taxes not included in price By. Mark Bjorait R1, Inc D� ?0 0 (T-4k-4•re, 1, tot. i 6700 30, �-- at) 0 U I I I TO Mike Haaland COMPANY City of Monticello PHONE/FAX 763-271-3277 ADDRESS 909 Golf Course Rd EMAIL mike.haaland@ci.monticello.mn.us CITY/STATE/ZIP Monticello, MN 55362 CONTRACT: MN CPV Contract Pricin DATE EARLIEST SHIP FOB SALES REPRESENTATIVE 1/2/2024 1 240.300 Days ARO I Factory I JA50N STEPP # DESCRIPTIONITEM CITY UNITTOTAL• ' SBF-200 Stepp Bottom Fired Kettle SBF-200 (200 Gallon) 1 $ 13,235.00 5 13,235.00 Each base unit includes: Burner, 20" Manway, Gravity Drain, Stainless Steel Liner, Electric Brakes, and a 2 Light System Diesel Burner with Automatic Temperature Controls 1 6,657.00 6,657.00 Diesel Burner Enclosure 1 683.00 683.00 Electric Overnight Heat 110V 150OW 1 2,002.00 2,002.00 Hydraulic Pumping System using 20 HP Kohler LPG Engine 1 10,591.00 10,591.00 20" Yellow Ortec Hose 0-200 degree 1 200.00 200.00 1 15 Gallon Recirculating Flush Tank 1 1,346.00 1,346.00 Hose Reel for Pumping System's Spray Wand 1 759.00 759.00 13 HP Gasoline Honda Engine 1 823.00 823.00 6' Full Circulating Spray Bar 1 5,648.00 5,648.00 8' Deluxe Tack Bar (upgraded) 1 518.00 518.00 LED Light 1 500.00 500.00 NOTE: CA 147Yor PROCESS ORDER UNTIL SPFOriEa Must Choose One Highway Orange Must Choose One LIGHT PLUG: 7 Pin RV Must Choose One HITCH: 3" Pintle All prices herein quoted are exclusive of sales, use, and other excise taxes. All such taxes, and any other taxes measured in whole or part, by gross receipts applicable to this transaction are to be borne by the purchaser. All export, import, and other duties, tariffs, and customs shall be paid for by the purchaser. If exemption is claimed by the purchaser from any of the foregoing, the purchaser shall furnish satisfactory proof of such exemption. *Please note: This quote Is valid for 20 days from the above date. Please remit back a signed copy to process the quote as an order to Jason@steppmfg.com ordered By Signature Approved By Signature INTERNAL USE ONLY: Stepp Order # Date Ordered Delivery Date P.O.# Ship Via Subtotal $ 42,962.001 $ %Tax $ Freight 220.50 Total Due $ 43,182.50 Special Instructions: Down Payment (Amount: Credit Card Card Type Card Number: On Terms x Letter of Credit to-wi ASPW� reprx'r- SWIFT Event No. 13366 Exhibit D - Price Schedule Specification No. 6.0 - Trailer Mounted Oil Distributor/Supply Trailer If more lines are needed for a type of option, insert lines after the existing line in that option section and number accordingly. Trailer Mounted Oil Distributor/ Supply Trailer Option Pricing Vendor FALCON ROAD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT, LLC Model 150- GALLON TACK TRAILER Total Cost $ - .... ......... ............................................................................................................................................................................ .r................,................................ ,...................... ....................................... : sSpec# ; Description........... Q................................................................................. ........................................................................!.......... Price u tota 6.1.0 Price for Base Unit: $ 35,285.00 1 $ 36" , an to 6.2.0 Tank & Accessories Options Use this section to offer options such as manhole strainer, thermometers, stick gauge, etc. Add lines as needed. If not offering items in this section delete lines and add "NA" after Section header 6.2.1 250-Gallon Tank in Lieu of 150-Gallon Tank (add to base) $ 949.00 $ 6.2.2 500-Gallon Tank in Lieu of 150-Gallon Tank (add to base) $ 11,959.00 6.2.3 Electric Overnight Heat - 220V (Includes two 1500 Watt Heating Elements) $ 3,092.00 $ 6.2.4 Timer:24-Hour $ 396.00 $ 6.2.5 Timer: 7-Day $ 521.00 S 6.3.0 Pump/Circulating System Options Use this section to offer items such as fromt suction , power wash down , etc. Add lines as needed. If not offering items in this section delete lines and add "NA" after Section header $ 4,843.00 $ 6.3.1 Reversing pump 6.4.1 Spray Bar Options Use this section to offer spray bar/ nozzle options. Add lines as needed. If not offering items in this section delete lines and add "NA" after Section header Must add a negitieve number for deducting spray bar equipment if offering a trailer as a Oil supply trailer 6.1.1 8' spray bar (deduct) _ _ $ (2,327.00) $ 6.5.0 Heating System Options NA Use this section to offer Heating system options. Add lines as needed. If not offering items in this section delete lines and add "NA" after Section header 6.6.0 Control/Instrumentation Options :NA Use this section for control & instrument type options . Add lines as needed. If not offering items in this section delete lines and add "NA" after Section header 6.7.0 Engine Options NA Use this section to offer engine options. Add lines as needed. If not offering items in this section delete lines and add "NA" after Section header 6.8.o Trailer Options Use this section to offer trailer options such as jacks, LED lighting, Heavy duty wheels, etc. Add as many lines as needed. If not offering items in this section delete lines and add "NA" after Section header 6.8.1 tiparee T4wlth d-bolfwheel and 16" I Ire 6.8.2 Step o opperAccess PLaform teach) 6.6.3 Wheel Cftoc s wffi ounfing rf3 acite— 6.9.o Miscellaneous Options $ 334.00 $ 278.00 , 204.00 r A347-00 Use this section to offer special paint and other options not covered in a previous section. Use as many numbered lines as you need to offer these options. Add lines as needed. If not offering items in this section delete lines and add "NA" after Section header 6.9.1 LED night work lights (qty 2) $ 480.00 $ - 6.9.2 kin cab remote control for spray bar $ 3,919.00 $6.s.3 eversing pump $ 4,843.00 $ - s.ia.o EXTENDED WARRANTY OPTIONS NA Use this section to offer performance/warranty options. Add as many lines as needed (Specify years, miles or hours extended term covers.) s.".o DELIVERY CHARGES See Sample Contract for details. DELIVERY STARTING POINT - City, State, Zip City: Freeland State: MI Zip:48623 Price per loaded mile 3.00 1 $ - s.+z.o DISCOUNT OFF LIST PRICE FOR RELATED PARTS AND ACCESSORIES % Discount See Sample Contract for details. Price List Date and Number List Price Document must be submitted with the response in SWIFT Shp Labor Rates Per Hour 6.13.' Repair Shop $ - 6.13.2 Body Shop $ - s.ia.o NEW EQUIPMENT RENTAL PROGRAM - N/A If rental programs are available on the new equipment offered, with the option to purchase, list the Hourly Rental Rate: $ - Weekly Rental Rate: $ - Monthly Rental Rate: $ - Percent (%) of Rental Fee applied to purchase price: $ - Total Cost: $ rr rrr�f Ma y _PMG Tank access cover Large fill port Manual product valve Hose reel and wand kr 771 � K 2 Emulsion Applicator The K 2 and K 5 Emulsion Applicators provide high-performance reliable heating and application of bituminous emulsions and tack coats. From the large maintenance hatch and 7 gauge steel tank to the reliable torsion axles, the K Series is built to get the job done with operator friendly features and long service life. Fuel Saving Flue Design- Save fuel and heat more efficiently with the unique "S-type" internal flue design.The "S" Design allows for better heat distribution and efficiency throughout the tank.This conserves fuel by almost 50% as compared to less efficient "U" designs. 250 and 500 gallon capacities: Choose the model that is right for the job. The K 5 is the workhorse and can handle large or small jobs.The K 2 offers all the features of the 5 but on a smaller single axle platform. "Eco-Friendly" Clean out - Both models are equipped with large solvent and Waste tanks. With a turn of the product valve, complete flush out of the plumbing system is achieved. The on -board Waste Tank allows storage of waste solvents until you can properly dispose of it back at the shop. Folding Spray bar - The optional folding spray bar can cover an 8' swath in a single pass. Fold one side up to cover smaller areas. Hand valves at each nozzle allow the spray width to be customized in one foot increments. 800-328-3874 PMG MAINTENANCE GROUP On -Board solvent and flush tanks \1 Adjustable pintle style hitch Gear pump for application and recirculation Large temperature gauge Wand recirculation port Standard torsion axles T K 2 K 5 Other Products from Emulsion Capacity (US gallons): Engine: Heating Method (overnight): Heating Method (operating): Heat Rating (BTU's): Material Pump (GPMS): GVWR (lbs): GAWR (lbs): Axle/Suspension: Brake Type: Application Wand/ Hose: Loading Ports: Fuel Capacity: Maintenance Hatch (I x w): Trailer Construction: Gravity Drain Valve: Temperature Gauge: Solvent Flush/ Waste Tank Capacity: Dimensions (I x w x h) Shipping Weight (lbs): Warranty: 250 5HP Gas Honda Electric Probe (option) Single "S type" Flue w/burner 80,000 15 3700 4000 1 (torsion type) Electric 72" aluminum (50ft on Hose Reel) 10" (vented and lockable) 2 Gallons 36" x 22" 5" channel 2" 2" 6 gallons 130" x 76" x 67" 1600 One Year 500 5HP Gas Honda Electric Probe (option) Dual "U type" Flue w/burners 80,000 x 2 15 6500 2 x 4000 2 (Torsion type) Electric 72" aluminum (50ft on Hose Reel) 10" (vented and lockable) 2 Gallons 36" x 22" 5" channel 2" 2" 1 1 gallons 130" x 79" x 67" 2300 OneYear Distributed By- Due to continuous improvement, specifications are subject to change without notice. HINES CoRPORNTIoN COMPANY cimlinepmg.com CPMG Spray Injection Patchers Emulsion Storage CUD Crack Sealers FULL PRODUCT LINE 800-328-3874 City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 3A. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 821 amending the Chapter 36 - Fee Schedule, Communitv Development — Economic Development and Planning/Zoning to add various planning and economic development escrows/fees Prepared by: Meeting Date: ❑ Consent Agenda Item City Clerk Reviewed by: Community Development Director ACTION REQUESTED 2/26/2024 Approved by: City Administrator 0 Public Hearing Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to adopt Ordinance 821 amending the fee schedule to add various planning and economic development escrows fees. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The fee schedule is typically updated annually; however, periodically fees must be adjusted throughout the year. The Fee Schedule is proposed to be updated by adding the following fees under the section title Community Development — Economic Development and Planning/Zoning: Business Subsidy — Abatement Application : $10,000 Escrow Deposit Similar to applications for Tax Increment Financing assistance, an escrow to cover the costs of review of the abatement application and preparation of required documents by City staff and consultants is needed. Review expenses by the City's financial consultant and attorney are expected and those costs should be absorbed by the applicant through escrow. As an escrow, expenses are reconciled to actual. Escrow Chart - Land Use Application Plan Review — Pointes at Cedar: Concept Plan Submission: $50 + $3500 escrow Development Stage Permit: $200 + Escrow Per Land Use Application Chart The Pointes at Cedar is a distinct zoning district. Similar to the City's other land use applications, an escrow is required to cover the costs associated with the land use application review by staff and consultants. The escrow amount is similar to that City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 required by PUD given the review steps and process are similar to that application format. As an escrow, expenses are reconciled to actual. Tree Escrow: $200/2.5 CPI tree It has been practice to require a security of $200 per 2.5 caliper inch tree as required to meet base landscaping standards or tree replacement associated with tree protection ordinance requirements. The fee schedule should reflect that requirement. The amount is an escrow and is reduced or released as trees are planted. I. Budget Impact: Cost for publishing the ordinance. II. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal administrative time to update the ordinance. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend approving the Ordinance to amend the fee schedule by adding the various planning and economic development fees. SUPPORTING DATA • Draft Ordinance 821 ORDINANCE NO.821 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 - THE 2024 FEE SCHEDULE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING/ZONING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: Section 1. The Fee Schedule of the Monticello City Code shall be amended as follows: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Business Subsidy — Abatement Application : $10,000 Escrow Deposit PLANNING/ZONING Escrow Chart - Land Use Application Plan Review — Pointes at Cedar: Concept Plan Submission: $50 + $3500 escrow Development Stage Permit: $200 + Escrow Per Land Use Application Chart Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello this 26t" day of February, 2024. CITY OF MONTICELLO Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk 061110 131 VOTING IN OPPOSITION: City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 4A. Consideration of pausing the Public Works Facilitv Project contracts with Oertel Architects and RJM Construction at 90% design completion to address project funding Prepared by: Meeting Date: ❑ Consent Agenda Item Public Works Director/City Engineer 2/26/2024 ® Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A City Administrator ACTION REQUESTED Motion to pause contracts with Oertel Architects and RJM Construction to address funding and timing for the Public Works Facility Project. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION November 8, 2021: Authorized the purchase of parcels 213100151400 and 213100153100 for a new public works facility. September 26, 2022: Authorized the solicitation of proposals for professional services for the New Public Works Facility project. November 28, 2022: Authorized Oertel Architects to provide professional services for the construction of a new public works facility. August 14, 2023: Authorized the solicitation of proposals for construction manager services for the construction of a new public works facility. October 23, 2023: Authorized RJM Construction to provide construction manager services for the construction of a new public works facility. November 13, 2023: Authorized continuing design of the mechanical system with conventional gas boiler heat for the Public Works Facility project. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City is currently working with Oertel Architects and RJM Construction to design and construct a new public works facility on a portion of the 70-acre School Boulevard property that the City purchased in 2021. Based on the condition and limitations of the existing public works facility located at 909 Golf Course Road, the City Council has taken a series of steps toward constructing a safe, functional, and efficient facility on approximately 20 acres to meet the long-term needs of the public works City Council Agenda: 2/26/2024 department and the community overall. The design of the new facility is nearing 90% and is on schedule to go out for bids in late March or early April. Although the City is scheduled to go out for bids later this spring, the City continues to pursue outside funding support in response to rapid cost escalations over the last two years. Monticello submitted a state funding request and is working with local legislators to develop a bonding request for the 2024 legislative session. The results of these efforts likely won't be known until the end of the legislative session in May 2024. If funds are received, the consultants will need to ensure the plans reflect any state requirements for the facility. In addition, whether funding support is received or not, additional discussions will be necessary prior to finalizing the bid documents. To preserve the existing budget, the plans can be halted at 90% and can be easily revisited once funding is secured or finalized. Budget Impact: Both contracts are included in the 2024 budget. Additional design costs are expected to modify plans to include any changes in the building codes or to meet outside funding requirements. Annual professional service fee escalations are also to be expected. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time working with the consultants on the design will be paused and shifted toward efforts to secure funding support. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The planning for the Public Works facility is a result of the 2040 strategy "Regularly conduct evaluations and needs assessments of the Public Works facility and other City buildings." STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION To ensure the final plans and specifications match funding availability and requirements, staff believes it would be prudent to pause the contracts with Oertel Architects and RJM Construction while additional funding efforts are made. However, staff will defer to the City Council on the final determination. SUPPORTING DATA • None