IDC Minutes 01-08-2008MINUTES
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Tuesday, January 8, 2008 - 7:00 a.m.
Bridge Room, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Mike Benedetto, Vice Chair Bill Tapper, Dick Van Allen, Don
Roberts, Dan Olson, Barb Schwientek, Lynne Dahl-Fleming, and Zona
Gutzwiller.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Johnson, Don Tomann, Patrick Thompson, and Sandy Suchy.
COUNCIL LIAISON PRESENT: Council Member Wayne Mayer.
STAFF PRESENT: Ollie Koropchak, Jeff O'Neill, and Angela Schumann.
LEGAL FIRM REPRESENTATIONJoeI Jamnik, Campbell-Knutson Law Firm.
IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To increase the industrial tax base, to create jobs at
liveable wage-levels, and to maintain a favorable and
desirable industrial environment in the City of
Monticello.
• 1. Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meeting.)
IDC Chair Mike Benedetto called the IDC meeting to order at 7:07 a.m. declaring a quorum
and welcomed Attorney Joel Jamnik.
2. Vote to approve the December 4 2007 IDC minutes
BILL TAPPER MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 4, 2007 IDC
MINUTES. DON ROBERTS SECONDED THE MOTION AND WITH NO
CORRECTIONS OR ADDITIONS, THE MINUTES WERE APPROVED AS WRITTEN.
3. Old Business:
A. Review the summary and strengths/weaknesses for the purpose to discuss and vote on
the proposed three organizational structure options for the Monticello IDC
B.
•
DOES THE CITY SEE A NEED FOR AN INDEPENDENT
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (IDC)? THE IDC
DESIRES THE CONTINUED INVOLVEMENT OF THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
IDC Minutes - 01/08/08
City Administrator Jeff O'Neill stated the Council wants the involvement of the IDC and the
three options outlined allows for the IDC to select or determine which option -what does the
IDC want? O'Neill presented Option I (see attachment) noting with the reconstituted EDA
consisting of seven members including two council members, the IDC would serve under the
EDA. This option would strengthen both the EDA and IDC with some loss of confidentiality
due to the open meeting law.
O'Neill presented Option II (see attachment) noting the IDC would operate as a separate
group except there would be an agreement between the City and IDC. The agreement would
give some sense of formalization between the City and IDC while providing the City with
documentation for the purpose of a legal compliance check (State Auditor). The
documentation would include: how the IDC relates to economic development and its public
purpose. According to O'Neill, this option appears to be the best of both worlds.
Option III (see attachment) retains the current IDC structure which is to operate independently
as a public action group. Strengths and weaknesses of each option were identified. Chair
Benedetto opened up discussion among the IDC members relative to the three options.
Van Allen asked: Who defines the agreement and the charge and mission of the IDC under
Option II? How much support does the IDC get? The IDC gets the negotiation power and
• staff expects to attend and support the IDC. Schwientek suggested athree-year perpetuating,
one-page agreement to be reviewed periodically at the IDC annual meeting. Olson asked if the
current IDC mission statement fits? Will the agreement work with the Council and EDA?
Perhaps the word: "advisory" should be added to the charge of the IDC. In response to the
question, if the Comp Plan would be referenced in the agreement; Attorney Jamnik stated it
could show a link between the organization and its recognition of the Comp Plan. Benedetto
noted the charge of the IDC as an "advisory board."
The committee continued to look at the legal points for negotiation. Appointment of committee
members by the Council formalizes or legitimizes governing of the board in such cases of
misbehavior which is rare stated Attorney Jamnik. Indemnification of IDC members under
Option II is consistent with the appointment by Council of other commission members.
Members of the IDC should not be restricted to residency of the City and it was suggested the
IDC nominate its members. Open meeting law: Regular meetings are open to the public. With
the greater number of IDC members, the likelihood of a quorum and anon-noticed meeting is
highly unlikely. Special meetings must be noticed three working days prior to the meeting date.
IDC records become public or open documents. Posting of IDC minutes and membership on
the city web site are negotiable items. If the IDC is not interested in compliance of the open
meeting law then Option III is more likely noted Jamnik.
•
2
IDC Minutes - 01/08/08
DON ROBERTS MADE A MOTION OF NO INTEREST OR TO ELIMINATE THE
STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED IN OPTION I: THE IDC TO SERVE UNDER THE EDA.
BILL TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION AND WITH NO FURTHER DISCUSSION,
THE MOTION CARRIED.
BILL TAPPER MADE A MOTION OF NO INTEREST OR TO ELIMINATE THE
STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED IN OPTION III: THE IDC TO OPERATE
INDEPENDENTLY AS A PUBLIC ACTION GROUP. BARB SCHWIENTEK
SECONDED THE MOTION stating the IDC would die without the support of Ollie and the
Council. She was not in favor offend-raising and felt indemnification was important. Although
Don Robert agreed with Schwientek's points, he felt based on his experience that separate
committees, independent and supported by cities, and self-funded were far more effective and
suggested the IDC explore formation as an independent group. Dick Van Allen agreed with
Roberts noting the importance of the IDC to voice (lobby) an opinion as an advocate for the
industrial businesses and developers. Koropchak noted organizational structures like the St.
Cloud Economic Development Partnership, Wright County Partnership and others who through
membership dues advocate for business retention and expansion, lobby legislators, and
promote industrial development efforts. Van Allen noted the pro-business climate in Big Lake
with astream-line and aggressive approach to economic development. Schwientek noted the
support of the community in the recent development of the new clinic in Big Lake and the
willingness of the city to use tax abatement. WITH NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE
MOTION CARRIED. VOTE 6-2. ROBERTS AND VAN ALLEN OPPOSED.
BILL TAPPER MADE A MOTION CREATING A SUBCOMMITTEE OF BENEDETTO,
DAHL-FLEMING, ROBERTS, AND VAN ALLEN ALONG WITH KOROPCHAK TO
DRAFT AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE IDC AND CITY BASED ON DISCUSSION
AND SUPPORT FOR OPTION II: THE IDC TO OPERATE AS A SEPARATE GROUP
(SIMILAR AS TODAY). DICK VAN ALLEN SECONDED THE MOTION AND WITH
NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE MOTION CARRIED. Attorney Jamnik stated he
would draft a form as a resolution for the subcommittee. The subcommittee scheduled an
independent meeting for Tuesday, January 15, at 8:00 a.m. The goal for IDC approval
February 5 and the Council approval February 11, 2008.
4. New Business:
A. Update on the proQxess to upgrade the electrical substation at Lake Pulaski near
Buffalo which serves Oakwood Industrial Park/Monticello Commerce Center.
(Rescheduled for February meeting.)
B. Presentation of 2007 IDC membership and terms -discuss re-appointments of three-
year term. Koropchak noted the three-year term of Benedetto, Roberts, Dahl-
Fleming, and Gutzwiller expired December 2007. All four members agreed to serve
another three-year term. Chair Benedetto read a letter of resignation from Mary
Barger. Given Mary's resignation, Koropchak noted three positions in the area of
3
IDC Minutes - 01/08/08
manufacturer, health care, and service are open. Koropchak informed members of a
call from the hospital and the interest by the new hospital administrator. Since the IDC
represents industry and manufacturers, the members encouraged recruitment of an
industrial leader and stressed the importance of the 75% attendance requirement.
Koropchak was directed to proceed in recruitment of a hospital representative and
others for possible IDC membership.
5. Reports:
A. Economic Development Report.
In addition to the written report, Koropchak informed members of the upcoming Comp
Plan Update Open House, on Wednesday, January 30, 5-8:00 p.m. in the Mississippi
Room. Also, the EDA and City Council are holding a joint workshop on TIF 101 and
Development/Purchase Contracts on Wednesday, January 16.
6. Review the draft cony of the January 2.2008 Planning Commission Agenda for industrial
related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if necessarX. Not applicable,
due to IDC change of meetin d
The Planning Commission meeting cycle was held prior to the IDC meeting for the month of
January.
7. Other Business.
A. Next IDC meeting -Tuesday, February 5, 2008.
Benedetto and Schwientek noted they would not be present at the February meeting.
B. Other business.
None.
8. Adjournment.
The IDC meeting adjourned at 8:30 a.m. by a consensus of its membership.
Ollie Koropchak, Recorder
•
4