Loading...
Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, May 7, 2024 — 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: Chair Paul Konsor, Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck, Rob Stark Council Liaison: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items D. Approval of Agenda E. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes —April 2, 2024 • Regular Meeting Minutes —April 2, 2024 • Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes — April 8, 2024 • Special Meeting Minutes —April 15, 2024 F. Citizen Comment 2. Public Hearings A. Continued —Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.046 Overlay Zoning Districts, Adopting the updated Flood Hazard Determination including Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the City of Monticello as part of the Official Zoning Map and the subject Zoning Ordinance Section herein. Applicant: City of Monticello B. Consideration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 Square Feet in the R-1, Single -Family Residential District. Applicant: Ben Holland C. Consideration of a Request for an Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations as an Accessory Use in the B-3, Highway Business District. Applicant: Doug Walkup D. Consideration of a Request for an Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for a Restaurant as a Principal Use and Drive -Through Services as an Accessory Use in the B-4, Regional Business District. Applicant: Westwood Professional Services 3. Regular Agenda Other Business A. Consideration of a Letter to Governor Walz Supporting Retention of Local Land Use Authority B. Community Development Director's Report 5. Adjournment MINUTES JOINT MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Tuesday, April 2, 2024 — 5:00 p.m. Monticello Community Center Planning Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Rob Stark, Melissa Robeck Planning Commissioners Absent City Councilmembers Present: City Councilmembers Absent: Staff Present: Chair Paul Konsor Mayor Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Sam Murdoff, Lee Martie Tracy Hinz Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Rachel Leonard, Hayden Stensgard 1. Call to Order Planning Commission Vice Chair Andrew Tapper called the joint workshop of the Monticello Planning Commission and City Council meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. 2. Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Submittal for a proposed multi -use development including Commercial Lodging, Event Center, and Restaurant facilities on a parcel currently in the Monticello Township and guided Employment Campus PIDs: 213-000-183101, 213-000-184203 Legal Description: Lengthy —Contact City Hall Applicant: Mike Schneider Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview of the Concept Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) joint workshop meeting's purpose and intent. The purpose was for a concept stage PUD review aimed at providing helpful and constructive feedback to the development team that presents the concept. Notices were sent out for this meeting to the surrounding area where the development is proposed. Ms. Schumann added that the meeting did not involve a public hearing, but if time allows, residents present may address the group. City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission, City Council, and the public. The subject property is roughly 8.3 acres bounded by Interstate 94 to the north and East Broadway Street to the south. The concept development proposal for the property consists of a first phase 4-story 76-room hotel (Grandstay Hotels), a 15,000-square-foot foot event center, and a 6,800-square- foot restaurant. The applicants have also indicated a second phase of construction on the site consisting of a 6,000-square-foot shed -style building that would be utilized to store vintage items similar to a museum. Mike Schneider, applicant, addressed the group. Mr. Schneider introduced the applicant team and noted that the three buildings proposed in the first phase of construction rely on each other for the success of the development. Tony Dingmann, of Doug Carlson Development Inc., noted they would be the general contractor for the development, and have constructed the proposed hotel design in recent years. He also noted the hotel would have a mix of standard -stay and extended - stay rooms. Roughly 12 of 76 rooms would be extended stay. Jon Kennedy, President of Grandstay Hotels, addressed the group. Lisa Shields-Ergen, of Vita Bella Ristorante Italiano, addressed the group regarding the proposed event center and restaurant. Planning Commissioner Melissa Robeck joined the meeting at 5:21 p.m. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler appreciated the applicants bringing forward this concept and asked if MnDOT was notified of the concept submittal and if they addressed the expansion of Interstate 94 in this area. Ms. Schumann clarified that MnDOT was notified of this meeting and the plans submitted for the concept. They provided preliminary comments that were included in the agenda packet but did not address the expansion project on 1-94. Mr. Schneider added that he has spoken with MnDOT representatives, and they said this property will not be affected by the expansion project. Councilmember Gabler asked if utility and paving work would be done at the same time as the three initial buildings were constructed or if it would be done prior. Mr. Schneider clarified that work will be done at the same time as the construction of the buildings in the first phase. Councilmember Gabler asked what type of signage would be proposed on site. Mr. Schneider said that had not been finalized, but there will be wall signage on the hotel at the minimum for visibility on the interstate. Mr. Kennedy added that due to the large amount of visibility of the site, they do not anticipate requesting any flexibility from what is allowed by ordinance. Commissioner Tapper noted that there is a section of sidewalk under the interstate bridge that stops around the west edge of the subject property and would appreciate the extension of that sidewalk to the east with this project. Commissioner Teri Lehner concurred. Commissioner Rob Stark asked what the max capacity of the event center would be. Mr. Schneider said it would likely fit 80-100 people. Michelle Weintzetl, of the applicant team, added that the development team is currently conducting a study that will assist in verifying the event center's needs for size. Councilmember Gabler asked if all three buildings in the first phase would be connected. The development team confirmed. Commissioner Tapper asked if the parking shown just east of where East Broadway Street ends is necessary for the development, as a portion of it does not appear to be on the two subject properties. Mr. Schneider said it is necessary for development circulation and required parking minimums. Councilmember Sam Murdoff asked whether the stormwater ponds identified on the site plan would be enough for the concept. Mr. Schneider said that it is likely that the stormwater area would be enlarged to support the development, but the two locations identified would work together to support it. Ms. Schumann addressed the next steps for this concept, including the need for the property owner to petition for annexation before submitting a formal land use application. The City Council is required to acknowledge any petitions for annexation prior to considering development of an eligible property in the township. No action was taken on the agenda item. 3. Adjournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 5:42 p.m. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING — PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, April 2, 2024 — 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING Monticello Community Center — North Mississippi Room 5:00 p.m. Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Submittal for a proposed multi -use development including Commercial Lodging, Event Center, and Restaurant facilities on a parcel currently in the Monticello Township and guided Employment Campus Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck, Rob Stark Commissioners Absent: Chair Paul Konsor Council Liaison Present: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Hayden Stensgard 1. General Business A. Call to Order Vice Chair Andrew Tapper called the regular meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Roll Call Commissioner Tapper called the roll. C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items None D. Approval of Agenda ROB STARK MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 2, 2024 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. E. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes —March 4, 2024 MELISSA ROBECK MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 4, 2024 JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. • Regular Meeting Minutes —March 4, 2024 MELISSA ROBECK MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 4, 2024 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. • Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes —March 25, 2024 TERI LEHNER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 25, 2024 JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Citizen Comment None 2. Public Hearings A. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello Citv Code. Title XV: Land Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.046: Overlay Zoning Districts, Adopting the updated Flood Hazard Determination including Flood Insurance Studv & Flood Insurance Rate Maas for the Citv of Monticello as part of the Official Zoning Map and the subject Zoning Ordinance Section herein. Applicant: City of Monticello Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. The City was recently notified that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has completed its flood hazard determinations for Wright County, including Monticello. This item requests that the City adopt the new maps created by FEMA following its determination. Staff requested tabling action on this item, in order to first propose an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance section on notification requirements to align with MN Statute. Currently, the zoning ordinance requires mailed notification to the surrounding property owners within 350 feet of a parcel being considered for a map amendment of any kind. Staff would propose to amend the Zoning Ordinance to align with the statute, rather than the 350 feet in all cases, as a matter of general applicability for notice requirements. The City will hold a separate public hearing on that notification amendment item. Following that discrepancy being clarified by way of an ordinance text amendment, staff would bring this item back in front of the Planning Commission for review and consideration. Regardless of that amendment, all those impacted by the floodplain designation will receive written notification. Commissioner Teri Lehner asked if there is any concern that people who were in the floodplain and are not anymore, and visa versa, would not be contacted regarding these changes becoming official. Ms. Schumann clarified that regardless of whether parcels experienced an increase or decrease in floodplain on their property, all properties involved in Monticello's floodplain will be notified. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler asked staff if they knew how many property owners would be notified. Ms. Schumann said roughly 190 property owners. Mr. Tapper opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-11 TO ALLOW FOR INDIVIDUAL MAILED NOTICE TO AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS. MELISSA ROBECK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. 3. Regular Agenda None 4. Other Business A. Community Development Director's Report Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. No action was taken on the item. 5. Adjournment ROB STARK MOVED TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:20 P.M. MINUTES JOINT MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Monday, April 8, 2024 — 5:00 p.m. Monticello Community Center Planning Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck, Rob Stark Planning Commissioners Absent: Chair Paul Konsor City Councilmembers Present: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Sam Murdoff, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Rachel Leonard, Jennifer Schreiber, Sarah Rathlisberger, Jim Thares, Hayden Stensgard 1. Call to Order Planning Commission Vice Chair Andrew Tapper called the joint workshop meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission and City Council to order at 5:00 p.m. 2. Concept Plan Submittal for the Pointes at Cedar District for proposed Commercial Lodging and future Restaurant as Principal Uses in the Populus Sub -District. PIDs: 155-278-001030, 155-278-001040 Legal Description: Lots 3 & 4, Block 1, Deephaven Applicant: Ted Thompson Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview of the purpose of the meeting to the Planning Commission, City Council, and the public. The Pointes at Cedar District Zoning Ordinance allows applicants to have a joint concept meeting with the Planning Commission and City Council, without requiring a decision from the City Council regarding the development. Similar to the Planned Unit Development Concept Stage process, the joint workshop step provides an opportunity to the Planning Commission and City Council to give initial feedback on a development proposal without having to make a formal decision. While not a public hearing, mailed notice did go out to the surrounding property owners, and if time allows, members of the public may provide comment. City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission, City Council, and the public. Proposed on 2 lots near the southwest corner of Chelsea Road and Edmonson Avenue NE is a 98-room hotel, and future -phased restaurant within the northern biome (Populus) of the Pointes at Cedar District. The hotel brand was identified in the applicant's submittal as a Fairfield Inn by Marriot. Commissioner Tapper asked if the discussion in the meeting needed to focus at all on the restaurant, as the only information provided for the restaurant at that time was that there were plans to have one located next to the proposed hotel. Mr. Grittman clarified that the discussion should mainly focus on the detail the applicant had provided and that when restaurant plans were provided in connection with the proposed development, the Planning Commission and City Council would then have the opportunity to provide feedback. Though the applicants are not required to resubmit a concept plan submittal application, design and detail on the restaurant would require a development stage permit review. Rob Thompson, of C.I. Construction and the applicant team, noted that the plan is to build the hotel and restaurant at the same time. The reason for the lack of information on the restaurant was that discussions were further along with the hotel company than the restaurant. Ted Thompson, applicant of C.I. Construction, added that the process of constructing a hotel requires more time than the restaurant. Ms. Schumann clarified that the developer will be required to apply for a development stage permit in the Pointes at Cedar District for both the hotel and restaurant, though the restaurant is not included in the review of the concept plan. Commissioner Melissa Robeck asked what the current occupancy rate is for the existing hotels in Monticello. Ms. Schumann noted that information on occupancy rates can be found in the Hotel Study completed in 2023. Rob Thompson added that they had conducted their own study prior to bringing forward the concept, and are confident that the project would be successful. Ted Thompson noted that within the concept is roughly an 80-foot-wide vacant parcel that would be available for development as well. At this time, there are no plans for development of the parcel. Any development of site would intend to complement the goals of the Pointes of Cedar district. Ted Thompson noted the applicant team was looking for feedback on commercial signage for the concept plan. Aware of the 14-foot maximum allowed within the Pointes at Cedar District, the applicants were looking for feedback on whether they could propose a pylon sign for the two facilities at a height of around 30 feet. Rob Thompson asked if there was a long-term plan to connect Edmonson Avenue NE and Oakwood Drive East. Ms. Schumann said there was no long-term plan to connect those two roads. Mayor Lloyd Hilgart asked if signage was the major concern with the items provided for the concept review. Rob Thompson said that it wasn't necessarily a major concern, just an area they would appreciate feedback on prior to submitting an application for a development stage permit. Mayor Hilgart asked if the property was located within the Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District. Mr. Grittman clarified that originally, these properties were included within the Freeway Bonus Sign district, but with the creation of the Poitnes at Cedar zoning district, they were removed. Mayor Hilgart asked what the district's sign limitations are. Mr. Grittman noted that the Pointes at Cedar District limits freestanding signage to monument signs at a max height of 14 feet, and maximum square footage of 100 square feet. Pylon signs are not permitted within the zoning district. Ted Thompson asked if the applicants were to propose a sign outside of the ordinance standard, how would they go about that? Ms. Schumann clarified that it would be applied for as a variance in companion with the Development Stage Permit application. Councilmember Sam Murdoff asked for clarification on whether there is additional developable land available within this proposed development. Ted Thompson said that there is a roughly 80-foot-wide piece of property to the west of the proposed development that would potentially be developed at a later date. There is a possibility that the remaining land area would be utilized to accommodate any outstanding needs of the original development, which remains unclear at this time. Councilmember Murdoff asked if there was any discussion on whether the hotel could be taller than 4 stories. Ted Thompson said that Marriot has a few designs for their Fairfield Inn hotels, none of which are taller than 4 stories. Mr. Thompson also noted the substantial cost increase for 5-story buildings over 4 stories. Commissioner Tapper noted that given the hotel would be 4 stories, the wall signage that would be on the building would provide exposure to the surrounding area, potentially as well as a pylon side. Rob Thompson clarified that exposure to the surrounding area was not necessarily a concern for the hotel, but rather the restaurant that would accompany the hotel. Councilmember Murdoff said that the project made sense with the given location, but expressed concerns with the lack of floor area. He asked if any of the projects within the Pointes at Cedar zoning district meet the requirements for floor area ratio. Ms. Schumann clarified that this is the first project reviewed against the provisions established in the Pointes at Cedar zoning district and did not know whether the existing development in the area would be able to meet the requirements. City Administrator Rachel Leonard noted that at the time of the development of the Pointes at Cedar zoning district language, assumptions for development density were made based on the master plan, with the intention of those decisions aligning with the ultimate goals of the area. As development proposals continue to be presented to the group for the Pointes at Cedar area, adjustments to the language may need to be made based on the practicality of developing the area realistically and successfully, particularly as related to accommodating desired uses within The Pointes. No action was taken on the item. 3. Adjournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 5:57 p.m. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, April 15, 2024— 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Chair Paul Konsor, Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck Commissioners Absent: Rob Stark Council Liaison Present: Councilmember Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order Chair Paul Konsor called the special meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Roll Call Mr. Konsor called the roll. C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items None D. Approval of Agenda ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 15, 2024 PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA. MELISSA ROBECK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. E. Citizen Comment None 2. Public Hearines A. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Sections 153.026, 153.027, and 152.028 for Application Review and Procedures. Applicant: City of Monticello Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. As staff reviewed the notification requirements, a discrepancy was found between the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and MN Statute for notification of proposed map amendments. The proposed text amendment would align the Zoning Ordinance language with MN Statute. It would eliminate the requirement of notifying surrounding property owners within 350 feet of a proposed map amendment for an area larger than five acres. This notification requirement would still apply under the same circumstance for subject property less than 5 acres in size. Chair Konsor opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Chair Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-11 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 153.027 FOR COMMON REVIEW PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. MELISSA ROBECK SECONDED THE MOTION. F)kruccinn Ms. Schumann noted that City Planner Steve Grittman said for purposes of clarification, that where the added language in the proposed ordinance states "written notice" should read as "written mailed notice". Mr. Konsor continued with a revision to his original motion as follows: PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-11 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 153.027 FOR COMMON REVIEW PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING THE REPLACEMENT OF "WRITTEN NOTICE" FOR "WRITTEN MAILED NOTICE" WHERE STATED IN SECTION 1 OF DRAFT ORDINANCE, BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. 3. Regular Agenda None 4. Other Business None 5. Adjournment ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE APRIL 15, 2024 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:10 P.M. Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 2A. Continued Public Hearine - Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.046: Overlay Zoning Districts, Adopting the updated Flood Hazard Determination including Flood Insurance Studv and Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the Citv of Monticello as part of the Official Zoning Map and the subject Zoning Ordinance Section herein. Applicant: City of Monticello Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Community Development Director 05/07/2024 Commission action): 05/28/2024 Additional Analysis by: Consulting City Planner, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Project Engineer, Chief Building & Zoning Official ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of Ordinance Amendment — Flood Hazard Determinations 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-12 recommending adoption of Ordinance No. 825 for Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.046: Overlay Zoning Districts, Adopting the updated Flood Hazard Determination including Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the City of Monticello as part of the Official Zoning Map and the subject Zoning Ordinance Section herein, based on finding in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2024-12 recommending adoption of Ordinance No. 825 for Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.046: Overlay Zoning Districts, Adopting the updated Flood Hazard Determination including Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the City of Monticello as part of the Official Zoning Map and the subject Zoning Ordinance Section herein, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion of other. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND This item is a continued public hearing, which was originally opened on April 2, 2024.The hearing was continued with action tabled to allow for mailed notice of the hearing to all property owners within the limits of the floodplain per the June 20, 2024 mapping. The notice has also been published twice in the Monticello Times in April and again in May. 1 Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 Property: Planning Case Number: Request(s): Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable Current Site Uses Surrounding Land Uses ANALYSIS Legal Description: City of Monticello PID #: City of Monticello 2024-13 Amendment to the Floodplain Overlay Zoning District, Adopting the updated Flood Hazard Determination including Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps NA Varies Floodplain Overlay District (FP) The flood hazard determination for Wright County, including Monticello, has been finalized by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The finalized flood hazard determinations include Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) and the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Monticello. The process of updating Wright County's floodplain mapping began in 2011 and has been ongoing since that time. The prior adopted floodplain mapping for Monticello was dated 1979 and 1981. In 2016, Wright County received notice of its public comment period for the new floodplain hazard determination information. The City worked with its designated environmental consultant WSB to understand the new mapping, provide map comments to the DNR and FEMA, and notify affected property owners of the comment period. No formal appeals were received during the comment period. As part of the requirements for continued inclusion in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), the City is also required to update its local ordinances for floodplain management. In conjunction with the 2016 public comment period and preliminary mapping, Monticello updated its Floodplain District ordinance, adopting the amended ordinance in 2018 and receiving certification of the ordinance from the DNR in coordination with FEMA in 2018. Due to comments on the flood hazard determinations received in other parts of Wright County, the final adoption of flood hazard determinations for Wright County was delayed. In 2022, the City received notice that FEMA was in its final review period for the determination. After K Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 finalizing changes to mapping for these other portions of Wright County, the flood hazard determinations were finalized by FEMA in 2023. Monticello's mapping remained consistent with the preliminary maps provided in 2016. The Wright County flood hazard determinations will now become effective June 20, 2024 In conjunction with the updated flood hazard determination for Wright County, the City of Monticello is required to update its Floodplain Overlay District ordinance to reference the final flood map and study dates. Adoption of the flood hazard determination components into the City's ordinance is required for Monticello to remain eligible for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which provides flood insurance to affected property owners. The DNR has provided a recommendation on the necessary language for the Floodplain ordinance amendment, which has been incorporated into a draft ordinance. The ordinance incorporates the final flood insurance rate map panels and flood insurance study, striking reference to the prior maps and study. The DNR has provided conditional approval of the proposed ordinance. The City is now required to hold a formal public hearing on the proposed ordinance. Following Council review and decision, the DNR must then certify the ordinance. The map panels and insurance study for Monticello are included for reference with this report. The Official Zoning Map has been updated to include reference to the June 20, 2024 FIRM panels as per the ordinance text, along the new delineation boundary. The appendix map has also been updated. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION The City is required to enact an ordinance that is compliant with federal floodplain regulations, including adoption of the updated floodplain maps and insurance study, to maintain Monticello's inclusion in the National Flood Insurance Program. Staff therefore recommend adoption of the proposed ordinance amendment. Following the effective date of the new flood hazard determinations in June, property owners may be contacted by their lenders regarding any specific requirements for flood insurance. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2024-12 B. Draft Ordinance 825 C. Draft Ordinance 825 As Amended D. FEMA Correspondence, March 12, 2024 E. DNR Conditional Approval, March 21, 2024 F. June 20, 2024 Flood Insurance Rate Map Panels, Monticello G. June 20, 2024 Flood Insurance Study, Wright County H. GIS Mapping — Floodplain Changes Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 1979 and 1981 FIRM Panels, Monticello 2024 Official Zoning Map and Appendix, As Amended to Include June 20, 2024 FIRM I] CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2024-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, TITLE XV: LAND USAGE, CHAPTER 153: ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 153.046: OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS, ADOPTING THE UPDATED FLOOD HAZARD DETERMINATION INCLUDING FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY AND FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AS PART OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND THE SUBJECT ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION HEREIN WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agenda (FEMA) maintains a program providing flood insurance for flood -prone and other affected properties; and WHEREAS, FEMA establishes a system identifying properties at risk of flooding, and further establishes a variable level of risk based on a variety of environmental and geographic factors; and WHEREAS, the subject properties can be eligible to participate in the federal flood insurance program when the applicable local government has adopted the required floodplain management ordinance; and WHEREAS, FEMA regularly conducts a study (the Flood Insurance Study — FIS) for the purpose of updating regulations and the mapping identifying the affected properties in a series of maps known as Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM); and WHEREAS, FEMA has provided notice that the updated FIS and FIRM for Wright County, including the City of Monticello, will be final as of June 20, 2024; and WHEREAS, notice of adoption of the Final Flood Hazard Determinations that make up the FIS and FIRM were published in the Federal Register by FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security on March 18, 2024, effective on June 20, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello notified all owners with property affected by the updated preliminary AS and FIRM, during the formal appeal period in 2016; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello, following published notice, conducted a required public hearing amending Chapter 153.046 for the Floodplain Overlay District in July 2018 under the guidance of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as the responsible agency for statewide Floodplain Management compliance, with said ordinance receiving certification from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources in August 2018; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello, under the guidance of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as the responsible agency for statewide Floodplain Management CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2024-12 compliance, has prepared proposed updates to its Floodplain Management Overlay District for the purpose of incorporating the new AS and FIRM, by reference, into its existing ordinance; and WHEREAS, the revised FIRM documents include maps with the following panel numbers: 27171C0155D, 27171C0160D, 27171C0165D, 27171C0170D, and 27171C0190D; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has notified all owners with property affected by the proposed 2024 amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the amendment on April 2 and May 7, 2024, and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission and comment on the proposed ordinance amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the approval: The proposed amendments are consistent with the City's interest in protecting the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, businesses, and property owners. The proposed amendment incorporates requirements of the Federal and State agencies as required to maintain local property owner eligibility in the federal flood insurance program. 3. Failure to adopt the relevant amendments may put individual property owners and the public at significant risk if left without eligibility in the federal flood insurance program. 4. The City has complied with the procedural requirements of FEMA and DNR in considering and adopting the proposed amendments. 5. The City of Monticello supports the purposes and intent of the Federal Flood Insurance Program through proper application of floodplain management regulations, and ensuring that property owners are eligible for insurance coverage. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, recommends that the Monticello City Council adopts the proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Official Zoning Map as specified in Ordinance No. 825. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2024-12 ADOPTED this 7t" day of May 2024, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION 92 ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 ORDINANCE NO.825 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE XV, CHAPTER 153, MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTIONS 153.046 (C) FOR FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. § 153.046(C) — General provisions is hereby amended as follows: (2) General provisions. (a) Lands to which ordinance applies. This chapter applies to all lands within the jurisdiction of the city of Monticello within the boundaries of the Floodway and Flood Fringe Districts. The boundaries of the zoning districts are determined by scaling distances on the Flood Insurance Rate Map, or as modified in accordance with § 153.046(C)(2)(a)2. below. 1. The Floodway, Flood Fringe and General Floodplain Districts are overlay districts that are superimposed on all existing zoning districts. The standards imposed in the overlay districts are in addition to any other requirements in this chapter. In case of a conflict, the more restrictive standards will apply. 2. Where a conflict exists between the floodplain limits illustrated on the official floodplain maps and actual field conditions, the flood elevations shall be the governing factor in locating the regulatory floodplain limits. 3. Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries will be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the Planning Commission and to submit technical evidence. (b) Incorporation of maps by reference. 1. The following maps together with all attached material are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of the Official Zoning Map and this chapter. The attached material, all prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, includes: a. Currently effective ffFlood Jnsurance &Study: (i) City .,f Aa.,,.cieell( ,�mmic7vtcr tt'May 1979. • b. of eetive Flood insufanee Rate Map panels enumerated ele'A > • (4) Wfigl# County, M;,, fles ta Panel 2705340018Geffeetiye 8/ 8/ oo2 ,.tly off etiye Flood B.,,,.,.1ai=y and >'1.,.,.1..,ay Map panels o ,-area below: �,. . . AAA L • I ,, 5 (i) Flood Insurance Study for Wright County Minnesota and Incorporated Areas, dated ti 22120" dated June 20, 2024. e. Pay Currently effective Flood Insurance Rate Map panels, dated June 20, 2024, enumerated below: (i) 27171 C0155D (ii) 27171 C0160D (iii) 27171 C0165D (iv) 27171 C0170D (v) 27171C0190D (i) W-fight County, Minnesota Panel 2717 1 GO 1 55D, dated 6Q2QO 11. (4) Wfigh# County, Minfles tRane��7171 GO 1 60D, dated 6/224 11.. 1.411) Wright Getm4y, Minnesota Panel > • i4v' W Tgh# County, Minnesota Panel 2717 1 rni�deAel-6,4 2201 . Wright ounty, Minnesota Panel 27171CO190D, dated 6Q2Q011. 2. ;tanee where the effeetive and preliminary maps eonfliet, the more r-estfietive map shall apply-. These materials are on file in the City Clerk's Office, City of Monticello City Hall. SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Chapter 153, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall. Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, Administrator AYES: NAYS: § 153.046(C) — General provisions [AS AMENDED] (2) General provisions. (a) Lands to which ordinance applies. This chapter applies to all lands within the jurisdiction of the city of Monticello within the boundaries of the Floodway and Flood Fringe Districts. The boundaries of the zoning districts are determined by scaling distances on the Flood Insurance Rate Map, or as modified in accordance with § 153.046(C)(2)(a)2. below. 1. The Floodway, Flood Fringe and General Floodplain Districts are overlay districts that are superimposed on all existing zoning districts. The standards imposed in the overlay districts are in addition to any other requirements in this chapter. In case of a conflict, the more restrictive standards will apply. 2. Where a conflict exists between the floodplain limits illustrated on the official floodplain maps and actual field conditions, the flood elevations shall be the governing factor in locating the regulatory floodplain limits. 3. Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries will be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the Planning Commission and to submit technical evidence. (b) Incorporation of maps by reference. 1. The following maps together with all attached material are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of the Official Zoning Map and this chapter. The attached material, all prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, includes: a. Currently effective Flood Insurance Study: (i) Flood Insurance Study for Wright County Minnesota and Incorporated Areas, dated June 20, 2024. e. Currently effective Flood Insurance Rate Map panels, dated June 20, 2024, enumerated below: (i) 27171C0155D (ii) 27171 C0160D (iii) 27171 C0165D (iv) 27171 C0170D (v) 27171 C0190D 2. These materials are on file in the City Clerk's Office, City of Monticello City Hall. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20472 Oti4A/'��FA T U-1FE MA D~ March 12, 2024 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED The Honorable Lloyd Hilgart Mayor, City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Mayor Hilgart: I commend you for the efforts that have been put forth in implementing the floodplain management measures for the City of Monticello to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). As you implement these measures, I want to emphasize the following: a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) have been completed for your community; the FIS and FIRM will become effective on June 20, 2024 and by the FIS and FIRM effective date, the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Regional Office is required to approve the legally enforceable floodplain management measures your community adopts in accordance with Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 60.3(d). As noted in FEMA's letter dated December 20, 2023, no significant changes have been made to the flood hazard data on the Preliminary and/or revised Preliminary copies of the FIRM for Wright County. Therefore, the City of Monticello should use the Preliminary and/or revised Preliminary copies of the FIRM as the basis for adopting the required floodplain management measures. Final printed copies of the FIRM for the City of Monticello will be sent to you within the next few months. If you encounter difficulties in enacting the measures, I recommend you contact the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Ecological and Water Resources Division. You may contact Ceil Strauss, CFM, the NFIP State Coordinator, by telephone at (651) 259-5713, in writing at 500 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155, or by electronic mail at ceil.strauss@state.mn.us. The FEMA Regional staff in Chicago, Illinois, is also available to provide technical assistance and guidance in the development of floodplain management measures. The adoption of compliant www.fema.gov The Honorable Lloyd Hilgart March 12, 2024 Page 2 floodplain management measures will provide protection for the City of Monticello and will ensure its participation in the NFIP. The Regional Office may be contacted by telephone at (312) 408-5500 or in writing. Please send your written inquiries to the Director, Mitigation Division, FEMA Region 5, at 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60605. You may have already contacted the NFIP State Coordinator and/or the FEMA Regional Office, and may be in the final adoption process or recently adopted the appropriate measures. However, in the event your community has not adopted the appropriate measures, this letter is FEMA's official notification that you only have until June 20, 2024 to adopt and/or submit a floodplain management ordinance that meets or exceeds the minimum NFIP requirements, and request approval from the FEMA Regional Office by the effective date. Your community's adopted measures will be reviewed upon receipt and the FEMA Regional Office will notify you when the measures are approved. I appreciate your cooperation to ensure that your community's floodplain management measures are approved by the FEMA Regional Office by June 20, 2024. Your compliance with these mandatory program requirements will enable your community to avoid suspension from the NFIP. Additional information on community suspensions as proposed, other notices of current NFIP community status information, and details regarding updated publication requirements of community eligibility status information under the NFIP can be found on the Community Status Book section of our website at www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-with-nfip/community-status-book. Notices for scheduled suspension will be available on the National Flood Insurance Community Status and Public Notification section of our website at www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-with- nfip/community-status-book/public-notification. Individuals without internet access will be able to contact their local floodplain management official and/or NFIP State Coordinating Office directly for assistance. Sincerely, -01 )e Ole" - 10 Rachel Sears, Director Floodplain Management Division Mitigation Directorate I FEMA cc: Thomas C. Sivak, Regional Administrator, FEMA Region 5 Ceil Strauss, CFM, NFIP State Coordinator, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Ecological and Water Resources Division Rachael Leonard, City Administrator, City of Monticello MDEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES March 21, 2024 The Honorable Lloyd Hilgart Mayor, City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Mayor Hilgart: RE: CONDITIONAL STATE APPROVAL OF FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE & REQUIRED NEXT STEPS On behalf of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), I am writing to conditionally approve the City of Monticello's draft floodplain management ordinance. We received the most recent draft of the City's floodplain management ordinance via email on February 29, 2024, from Community Development Director, Angela Schumann. The ordinance is being amended to incorporate the updated Flood Insurance Rate Map panels and accompanying Flood Insurance Study for Wright County, with an effective date of June 20, 2024, and maintain participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 103F.121, we find that the City's draft floodplain management ordinance substantially complies with the state floodplain management rules (Minnesota Rules, parts 6120.5000 to 6120.6200) and, to the best of our knowledge, with the floodplain management standards of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. It is hereby conditionally approved. We will provide final approval of the City's draft ordinance once the DNR has received a copy of the following, no later than June 18, 2024: • the adopted ordinance (complete ordinance, signed and stamped with the community seal), • the affidavit of publication, and • the completed "Ordinance Processing Checklist" (enclosed). Please forward these documents via email to the DNR Floodplain Program email at flood plain.dnr@state.mn.us, and copy the DNR's State NFIP Coordinator, Ceil Strauss at ceil.strauss@state.mn.us. Upon receipt and verification, we will send a final approval letter. Ms. Strauss will then transmit the ordinance and final approval letter to our contacts at FEMA's Chicago Regional Office. Be advised that any future amendments to this ordinance or change in the designation of flood prone areas require prior DNR approval. In addition, you are required to send copies of hearing notices and final decisions pertaining to floodplain variances, conditional uses, and ordinance amendments to this agency. Please email these notices to Ceil Strauss. Should you have any questions on this ordinance or related matters, please contact Ms. Strauss via email or at (651) 259-5713. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Division of Ecological and Water Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25, Saint Paul, MN 55155-4025 Though FEMA must receive a signed, certified, and effective ordinance no later than June 20, 2024, we request that you submit the materials noted above to the DNR no later than June 18, 2024, to accommodate for processing. If FEMA has not received the documentation by the map effective date, FEMA will suspend the City from the National Flood Insurance Program. While our office in St. Paul will be the main contact for the ordinance update, your DNR Area Hydrologist will continue to be your main contact for day-to-day assistance with administering your floodplain management ordinance and questions about other DNR water -related programs and permits. Your Area Hydrologist is James Bedell, who can be contacted at (320) 223-7850 or james.bedell@state.mn.0 . The DNR greatly appreciates your community's cooperation and initiative in providing for the reduction of flood damages through the adoption and administration of this ordinance. Sincerely, Emily Javens Digitally signed by Emily Javens Date: 2024.03.21 16:37:26-05'00' Emily Javens Land Use Unit Supervisor DNR Ecological and Water Resources Enclosures: Ordinance Processing Checklist Angela Schumann, Community Development Director —City of Monticello Dan Lais, DNR EWR Regional Manager Tim Crocker, DNR EWR District Manager Constance Holth, DNR EWR North District Hydrologist Supervisor James Bedell, DNR Area Hydrologist Ceil Strauss, DNR State Floodplain Manager/NFIP Coordinator 171CO025D *27171C0050D MAP DATES MAP NUMBER 7171 CO075D 27171CO070D 6/20/2024 CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY '171C0080D 6/20/2024 CLEARWATER RIVER City of South Haven I i 27171CO090D 6/20/2024 171 CO250D 27171 CO275D 6/20/2024 I I I 7171 CO245D 6/20/2024 I wax �I3 *PANEL NOT PRINTED - AREA OUTSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY **PANEL NOT PRINTED - NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS 7171 CO085D 6/20/2024 City of _ Annendale �27171 C0095D 1 6/20/2024 Wright County Unincorporated Areas North Fork Crow River 27171 CO015D 27171C0016D 27171 CO017D 27171 CO040D 27171 CO045D 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 s� •�P 4 City of r� Clearwater 27171 CO018D 27171 C0019D 612012024 6/20/2024 7171 CO105D **27171 C0110D *2 1 C0150D 6/20/2024 27171 C0155D 27171 C0160D *27171 CO200D *27171 CO225D 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 Wright County Unincorporated Areas S O � GO '� 27171CO135D 6/20/2024 RN & BURSANTAOFE AI WE RAILWAY 27171 C0115D 6/20/2024 *27171 C0120D 27171 CO215D 270D 27171 C0195D 27171 CO220D Township otter Creek 6/2012024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 of Corinna SHERBURNE COUNTY 24 - MISSISSIPPI RIVER 25 City of WRIGHT COUNTY Monticello Wright County City of Monticello Unincorporated Areas ity of creek City of Otsego Annendale Otsego MAPLE LAKE 27171 CO165D 27171 CO170D MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 27171 CO300D 6/20/2024 7171 CO285D /20/2024 '927171 CO310D **27171 C0330D 27171 CO335D 27171 CO355D **27171 C0360D 27171 CO380D City of 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 Maple Lake i City of MAPLE PELICAN City of Albertville sa Da ton LAKE LAKE(AREA NOT INCLUDED) Alt 25 29D 6/2 6120/2012024 27171 CO358F 6/20/2024 27171 CO359F 612012024 : �0 CO LAKE City of St. Michael 7171 C0305D PULASKI School 27171 C0328D Lake Creek 27171 C0385D 6/2012024 27171 CO315D �27171 C0316D 6/20/2024 City of 27171 C0336D 612012024 27171 CO340D 27171 CO345D 27171 CO365D 27171 CO370D *27171 C0400D 6/20/2024 Buffalo 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 BUFFALO Buffalo Lake Tributary City of Hanover LAKE BUFFALO (AREA NOT INCLUDED) 27� D MUNICIPAL 20120024 AIRPORT Wright County LAKE `� �jLO Unincorporated Areas CHARLOTTE � q North Fork North Fork -, � � Wright County Crow River Crow River LASE z5 � LAKE Unincorporated Areas 1 27171 CO318D 27171 CO319D ** 6/20/2024 1 6/20/2024 1 2 +171 C0338D 55 MARTHA This FIRM Index displays the map date for each FIRM panel at the time that this Index was printed. Because this Index may not be distributed to unaffected communities in subsequent revisions, users may determine the current map date for each FIRM panel by visiting the FEMA Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX) website at https://msc.fema.gov, or by calling the FEMA Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX) at 1-877-336-2627. Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Mapping and Insurance eXchange at the number listed above. NOTE TO USER Future revisions to this FIRM Index will only be issued to communities that are located on FIRM panels being revised. This FIRM Index therefore remains valid for FIRM panels dated June 20, 2024 or earlier. Please refer to the "MOST RECENT FIRM PANEL DATE" column in the Listing of Communities table to determine the most recent FIRM Index date for each community. o1: 11111 MAP INDEX MAP REPOSITORIES (Maps available for reference only, not for FIRM distribution.) ALBERTVILLE, CITY OF: SOUTH HAVEN, CITY OF: m FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP CityHall DELANO, CITY OF: City Hall WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA 5959 Main Avenue NE City Hall 521 Oak Avenue INDEX LOCATOR DIAGRAM WRIGHT COUNTY, Albertville, Minnesota 55301 234 Second Street North South Haven, Minnesota 55382 CD Delano, Minnesota 55328 0MINNESOTA ANNANDALE, CITY OF: ST. MICHAEL, CITY OF: City Hall HOWARD LAKE, CITY OF: City Hall ® AND INCORPORATED AREAS City Hall 11800 Town Center Drive NE SEE LISTING OF COMMUNITIES TABLE 30 Cedar Street E Y ( ) Annandale, Minnesota 55302 625 8th Avenue St. Michael, Minnesota 55376 Howard Lake, Minnesota 55349 BUFFALO, CITY OF: WAVERLY, CITY OF: MAP INDEX City Center MAPLE LAKE, CITY OF: City Hall 212 Central Avenue City Hall 502 Atlantic Avenue Buffalo, Minnesota 55313 10 Maple Avenue S Waverly, Minnesota 55390 SHEET 1 OF 2 Maple Lake, Minnesota 55358 CLEARWATER, CITY OF: WRIGHT COUNTY PANELS PRINTED: 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, City Hall MONTICELLO, CITY OF: (UNINCORPORATED AREAS): I10D 40, 45, 70, 80, 85, 90, 95, 105, 115, 135, 155, 160, 605 County Road 75 City Hall Wright County Government Center SHEET 1 OF 2 165, 170, 190, 195, 215, 220, 245, 275, 285, 300, Clearwater, Minnesota 55320 505 Walnut Street 3650 Braddock Avenue NE 305, 310, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 328, 329, 335, Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Buffalo, Minnesota 55313 336, 340, 345, 355, 358, 359, 365, 370, 380, 385 COKATO, CITY OF: (SEE SHEET 2 FOR ADDITIONAL PANELS City Hall MONTROSE, CITY OF: ® 255 Broadway Avenue S City Hall PRINTED) Cokato, Minnesota 55321 311 Buffalo Avenue S Montrose, Minnesota 55363 CORINNA, TOWNSHIP OF Corinna Township Hall OTSEGO, CITY OF: 9801 Ireland Avenue NW City Hall Annandale, Minnesota 55302 13400 90th Street NE Otsego, Minnesota 55330 THIS AREA SHOWN ON SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 FOR LISTING OF COMMUNITIES MAP NUMBER ° 27171CINDlA ^� �r`9ND EFFECTIVE DATE S� J U N E 20, 2024 Federal Emergency Management Agency i NOTES TO USERS LEGEND This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. It does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources of small size. The community map repository should be consulted for possible updated or additional flood hazard information. To obtain more detailed information in areas where Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) and/or floodways have been determined, users are encouraged to consult the Flood Profiles and Floodway Data and/or Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables contained within the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report that accompanies this FIRM. Users should be aware that BFEs shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole -foot elevations. These BFEs are intended for flood insurance rating purposes only and should not be used as the sole source of flood elevation information. Accordingly, flood elevation data presented in the FIS Report should be utilized in conjunction with the FIRM for purposes of construction and/or floodplain management. Coastal Base Flood Elevations shown on this map apply only landward of 0.0' North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Users of this FIRM should be aware that coastal flood elevations are also provided in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Elevations shown in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table should be used for construction and/or floodplain management purposes when they are higher than the elevations shown on this FIRM. Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. Floodway widths and other pertinent Floodway data are provided in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. Refer to Section 2.4 "Flood Protection Measures" of the Flood Insurance Study Report for information on flood control structures for this jurisdiction. The projection used in the preparation of this map was Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 15. The horizontal datum was NAD 83. GRS 1980 spheroid. Differences in datum, spheroid, projection or UTM zones used in the production of FIRMs for adjacent jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across jurisdiction boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this FIRM. Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. For information regarding conversion between the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988, visit the National Geodetic Survey website at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov or contact the National Geodetic Survey at the following address: NGS Information Services NOAA, N/NGS12 National Geodetic Survey SSMC-3, #9202 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring. Maryland 20910-3282 (301) 713-3242 To obtain current elevation, description, and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, please contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301) 713- 3242, or visit its website at http://www.ngs-noaa.gov. Base map information shown on this FIRM was derived from 6 inch pixel resolution digital ortho imagery for Wright County dated 2008. The profile baselines depicted on this map represent the hydraulic modeling baseline that match the flood profiles in the FIS report. As a result of improved topographic data, the profile baseline, in some cases, may deviate significantly from the channel centerline or appear outside the SFHA. Corporate limits shown on this map are based on the best data available at the time of publication. Because changes due to annexations or de -annexations may have occurred after this map was published, map users should contact appropriate community officials to verify current corporate limit locations. Please refer to the separately printed Map Index for an overview map of the county showing the layout of map panels; community map repository addresses; and a Listing of Communities table containing National Flood Insurance Program dates for each community as well as a listing of the panels on which each community is located. For information on available products associated with this FIRM visit the Map Service Center (MSC) website at http://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the MSC website. If you have questions about this map, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX) at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA website at http://wwvv.fema.gov/business/nfip. 93' 52' 30" 45' 22' 5024000mN 5023000�1\1 50220_:.' N 5021000"N 5020000mN 50190oomN 45' 18' 45" 93' 5 432000mE 433000mE 434a0amE 435o00mE 436o0omE BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY T 45" 45' 22' 30" 911 14 ONE AE NDY LN 18' 45" SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water -surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AE Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE AR Special Flood Hazard Areas formerly protected from the 1% annual chance flood by a flood control system that was subsequently decertified. Zone AR indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provide protection from the 1% annual chance or greater flood. ZONE A99 Area to be protected from 1% annual chance flood by a Federal flood protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE The Floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible. COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs) CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary 0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary Floodway boundary Zone D boundary ••••••••••••• CBRS and CIPA boundary Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Area Zones and boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different Base Flood Elevations, flood depths, or flood velocities. 513- Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet* (EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone,- elevation in feet* Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 A A Cross section line 23 - - - - - 23 Transect line 45 02' 08", 93' 02' 12" Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) Western Hemisphere 4989000m N 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid values, zone 15 DX5510 X Bench mark (see explanation in Notes to Users section of this FIRM panel) M1.5 River Mile MAP REPOSITORIES Refer to Map Repositories list on Map Index EFFECTIVE DATE OF COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP June 20, 2024 EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping. refer to the Community Map History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community. contact your insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Proaram at 1-800-638-6620. MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 500 0 1000 2000 FEET METERS 300 0 300 600 QD PANEL 0155D FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 155 OF 660 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX MONTICELLO, CITY OF 270541 0155 D WRIGHT COUNTY 270534 0155 D Notice to User: The Map Number shown below should be used when placing map orders; the Community Number shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. a�VA R TF�; MAP NUMBER 27171 CO155D EFFECTIVE DATE ^'D s�GJ JU N E 20, 2024 Federal Emergency Managemcnt:kgencN NOTES TO USERS LEGEND This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. It does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources of small size. The community map repository should be consulted for possible updated or additional flood hazard information. To obtain more detailed information in areas where Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) and/or floodways have been determined, users are encouraged to consult the Flood Profiles and Floodway Data and/or Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables contained within the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report that accompanies this FIRM. Users should be aware that BFEs shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole -foot elevations. These BFEs are intended for flood insurance rating purposes only and should not be used as the sole source of flood elevation information. Accordingly, flood elevation data presented in the FIS Report should be utilized in conjunction with the FIRM for purposes of construction and/or floodplain management. Coastal Base Flood Elevations shown on this map apply only landward of 0.0' North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Users of this FIRM should be aware that coastal flood elevations are also provided in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Elevations shown in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table should be used for construction and/or floodplain management purposes when they are higher than the elevations shown on this FIRM. Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. Floodway widths and other pertinent Floodway data are provided in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. Refer to Section 2.4 "Flood Protection Measures" of the Flood Insurance Study Report for information on flood control structures for this jurisdiction. The projection used in the preparation of this map was Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 15. The horizontal datum was NAD 83. GRS 1980 spheroid. Differences in datum, spheroid, projection or UTM zones used in the production of FIRMS for adjacent jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across jurisdiction boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this FIRM. Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. For information regarding conversion between the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988, visit the National Geodetic Survey website at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov or contact the National Geodetic Survey at the following address: NGS Information Services NOAA. N/NGS12 National Geodetic Survey SSMC-3, #9202 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring. Maryland 20910-3282 (301) 713-3242 To obtain current elevation, description, and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, please contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301) 713- 3242, or visit its website at http://www.ngs-noaa.gov. Base map information shown on this FIRM was derived from 6 inch pixel resolution digital ortho imagery for Wright County dated 2008. The profile baselines depicted on this map represent the hydraulic modeling baseline that match the flood profiles in the FIS report. As a result of improved topographic data, the profile baseline, in some cases, may deviate significantly from the channel centerline or appear outside the SFHA. Corporate limits shown on this map are based on the best data available at the time of publication. Because changes due to annexations or de -annexations may have occurred after this map was published, map users should contact appropriate community officials to verify current corporate limit locations. Please refer to the separately printed Map Index for an overview map of the county showing the layout of map panels; community map repository addresses; and a Listing of Communities table containing National Flood Insurance Program dates for each community as well as a listing of the panels on which each community is located. For information on available products associated with this FIRM visit the Map Service Center (MSC) website at http://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the MSC website. If you have questions about this map, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX) at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip. r. 5024 023` 50220 5020001 5019000 PROFILE BASI WRIGHT COUNT ZONE RIVER ST PROFILE BASE Otter Cr SAND` 45' 1 9 93' 48' 45" OTTERCREEK WILLOW ST RD 437000mE 438000mE 439000r„E 440000n,E 441000mE :)' UU" 45' 22' 30" 18' 45" SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water -surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AE Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE AR Special Flood Hazard Areas formerly protected from the 1% annual chance flood by a flood control system that was subsequently decertified. Zone AR indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provide protection from the 1% annual chance or greater flood. ZONE A99 Area to be protected from 1% annual chance flood by a Federal flood protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE The Floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible. COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs) CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary 0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary Floodway boundary Zone D boundary ••••••••••••• CBRS and OPA boundary Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Area Zones and boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different Base Flood Elevations, flood depths, or flood velocities. 513- Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet* (EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone; elevation in feet* Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 A A Cross section line 23 - - - - - 23 Transect line 4502' 08", 93- 02' 12" Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) Western Hemisphere 4989000` N 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid values, zone 15 DX5510 X Bench mark (see explanation in Notes to Users section of this FIRM panel) M1.5 River Mile MAP REPOSITORIES Refer to Map Repositories list on Map Index EFFECTIVE DATE OF COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP June 20, 2024 EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping. refer to the Community Map History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community. contact your insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Prooram at 1-800-638-6620. MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 500 0 1000 2000 FEET METERS 300 0 300 600 QD PANEL 0160D FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 160 OF 660 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX MONTICELLO, CITY OF 270541 0160 D Notice to User: The Map Number shown below should be used when placing map orders; the Community Number shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. a�?ARTFti, MAP NUMBER 27171 CO160D EFFECTIVE DATE F`9^o sJUNE 20, 2024 Federal Emergency Managemeiwk-eneN NOTES TO USERS LEGEND This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. It does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources of small size. The community map repository should be consulted for possible updated or additional flood hazard information. To obtain more detailed information in areas where Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) and/or floodways have been determined, users are encouraged to consult the Flood Profiles and Floodway Data and/or Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables contained within the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report that accompanies this FIRM. Users should be aware that BFEs shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole -foot elevations. These BFEs are intended for flood insurance rating purposes only and should not be used as the sole source of flood elevation information. Accordingly, flood elevation data presented in the FIS Report should be utilized in conjunction with the FIRM for purposes of construction and/or floodplain management. Coastal Base Flood Elevations shown on this map apply only landward of 0.0' North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Users of this FIRM should be aware that coastal flood elevations are also provided in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Elevations shown in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table should be used for construction and/or floodplain management purposes when they are higher than the elevations shown on this FIRM. Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. Floodway widths and other pertinent Floodway data are provided in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. Refer to Section 2.4 "Flood Protection Measures" of the Flood Insurance Study Report for information on flood control structures for this jurisdiction. The projection used in the preparation of this map was Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 15. The horizontal datum was NAD 83. GRS 1980 spheroid. Differences in datum, spheroid, projection or UTM zones used in the production of FIRMs for adjacent jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across jurisdiction boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this FIRM. Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. For information regarding conversion between the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988, visit the National Geodetic Survey website at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov or contact the National Geodetic Survey at the following address: NGS Information Services NOAA. N/NGS12 National Geodetic Survey SSMC-3, #9202 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring. Maryland 20910-3282 (301) 713-3242 To obtain current elevation, description, and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, please contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301) 713- 3242, or visit its website at http://www.ngs-noaa.gov. Base map information shown on this FIRM was derived from 6 inch pixel resolution digital ortho imagery for Wright County dated 2008. The profile baselines depicted on this map represent the hydraulic modeling baseline that match the flood profiles in the FIS report. As a result of improved topographic data, the profile baseline, in some cases, may deviate significantly from the channel centerline or appear outside the SFHA. Corporate limits shown on this map are based on the best data available at the time of publication. Because changes due to annexations or de -annexations may have occurred after this map was published, map users should contact appropriate community officials to verify current corporate limit locations. Please refer to the separately printed Map Index for an overview map of the county showing the layout of map panels; community map repository addresses; and a Listing of Communities table containing National Flood Insurance Program dates for each community as well as a listing of the panels on which each community is located. For information on available products associated with this FIRM visit the Map Service Center (MSC) website at http://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the MSC website. If you have questions about this map, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX) at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip. 9 45° 18' 5017000mN ,C % 5015000mN 501400omN 5013000n,N 5012o0OP'N 45° 1500" 93° 5 432000mE 4 0oom 4 „ FLOODING EFFECTS FROM 33 E 34ccc E 435o0omE OTTER CREEK 41r000mr JUINS NANLL UJ3 31J 93° 48' 45" 18' 45" 'RAIRIE REEK LN Wright County Unincorporated Areas 270534 ity of Monticello 270541 ON SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water -surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AE Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE AR Special Flood Hazard Areas formerly protected from the 1% annual chance flood by a flood control system that was subsequently decertified. Zone AR indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provide protection from the 1% annual chance or greater flood. ZONE A99 Area to be protected from 1% annual chance flood by a Federal flood protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations determined. WFLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE The Floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible. COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs) CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary 0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary Floodway boundary Zone D boundary ••••••••••••• CBRS and OPA boundary Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Area Zones and boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different Base Flood Elevations, flood depths, or flood velocities. 513- Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet* (EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone; elevation in feet* ^Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 A A Cross section line 23 - - - - - 23 Transect line 4502' 08", 93' 02' 12' Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) Western Hemisphere 4989000` N 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid values, zone 15 DX5510 X Bench mark (see explanation in Notes to Users section of this FIRM panel) M1.5 River Mile MAP REPOSITORIES Refer to Map Repositories list on Map Index EFFECTIVE DATE OF COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP June 20, 2024 EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping. refer to the Community Map History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community. contact your insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Prooram at 1-800-638-6620. MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 500 0 1000 2000 FEET METERS 300 0 300 600 fID PANEL 0165D FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 165 OF 660 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX MONTICELLO, CITY OF 270541 0165 D WRIGHT COUNTY 270534 0165 D Notice to User: The Map Number shown below should be used when placing map orders; the Community Number shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. a�?ARTFti, MAP NUMBER 27171 CO165D EFFECTIVE DATE F`9^o sJUNE 20, 2024 Federal Emergency Managemeiwk-eneN NOTES TO USERS LEGEND This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. It does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources of small size. The community map repository should be consulted for possible updated or additional flood hazard information. To obtain more detailed information in areas where Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) and/or floodways have been determined, users are encouraged to consult the Flood Profiles and Floodway Data and/or Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables contained within the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report that accompanies this FIRM. Users should be aware that BFEs shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole -foot elevations. These BFEs are intended for flood insurance rating purposes only and should not be used as the sole source of flood elevation information. Accordingly, flood elevation data presented in the FIS Report should be utilized in conjunction with the FIRM for purposes of construction and/or floodplain management. Coastal Base Flood Elevations shown on this map apply only landward of 0.0' North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Users of this FIRM should be aware that coastal flood elevations are also provided in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Elevations shown in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table should be used for construction and/or floodplain management purposes when they are higher than the elevations shown on this FIRM. Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. Floodway widths and other pertinent floodway data are provided in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. Refer to Section 2.4 "Flood Protection Measures" of the Flood Insurance Study Report for information on flood control structures for this jurisdiction. The projection used in the preparation of this map was Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 15. The horizontal datum was NAD 83. GRS 1980 spheroid. Differences in datum, spheroid, projection or UTM zones used in the production of FIRMs for adjacent jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across jurisdiction boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this FIRM. Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. For information regarding conversion between the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988, visit the National Geodetic Survey website at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov or contact the National Geodetic Survey at the following address: NGS Information Services NOAA. N/NGS12 National Geodetic Survey SSMC-3, #9202 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring. Maryland 20910-3282 (301) 713-3242 To obtain current elevation, description, and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, please contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301) 713- 3242, or visit its website at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov. Base map information shown on this FIRM was derived from 6 inch pixel resolution digital ortho imagery for Wright County dated 2008. The profile baselines depicted on this map represent the hydraulic modeling baseline that match the flood profiles in the FIS report. As a result of improved topographic data, the profile baseline, in some cases, may deviate significantly from the channel centerline or appear outside the SFHA. Corporate limits shown on this map are based on the best data available at the time of publication. Because changes due to annexations or de -annexations may have occurred after this map was published, map users should contact appropriate community officials to verify current corporate limit locations. Please refer to the separately printed Map Index for an overview map of the county showing the layout of map panels, community map repository addresses; and a Listing of Communities table containing National Flood Insurance Program dates for each community as well as a listing of the panels on which each community is located. For information on available products associated with this FIRM visit the Map Service Center (MSC) website at http://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the MSC website. If you have questions about this map, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX) at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip. Ee BROL 5( Wright Cou Unincorporatei 270534 City of Mont 270541 50 5a- NN/right Cot Unincorporate 270534 Wright Cou Unincorporatec 270534 501 501, 5012 4 4 OOOm 4 OOOm 37 E 38 E 439000mE 440000mE 441000mE 93° 48' 45" OAK LN 910 ZONE A Z7J w� V" 0" i° 18' 45" Wright County Unincorporated Areas 270534 Wright County Unincorporated Areas 270534 iml SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water -surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AE Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE AR Special Flood Hazard Areas formerly protected from the 1% annual chance flood by a flood control system that was subsequently decertified. Zone AR indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provide protection from the 1% annual chance or greater flood. ZONE A99 Area to be protected from 1% annual chance flood by a Federal flood protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE The Floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible. COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS ` \ OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs) CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary 0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary Floodway boundary Zone D boundary ••••••••••••• CBRS and CIPA boundary Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Area Zones and boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different Base Flood Elevations, flood depths, or flood velocities. - 513- Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet* (EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone; elevation in feet* Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 A A Cross section line 23 - - - - - 23 Transect line 4502' 08", 93' 02' 12" Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) Western Hemisphere 4989000- N 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid values, zone 15 DX5510 X Bench mark (see explanation in Notes to Users section of this FIRM panel) M1.5 River Mile MAP REPOSITORIES Refer to Map Repositories list on Map Index EFFECTIVE DATE OF COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP June 20, 2024 EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping. refer to the Community Map History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community. contact your insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. Z�& MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 500 0 1000 2000 FEET METERS 300 0 300 600 QD PANEL 0170D FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 170 OF 660 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX MONTICELLO, CITY OF 270541 0170 D WRIGHT COUNTY 270534 0170 D Notice to User: The Map Number shown below should be used when placing map orders; the Community Number shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. a�?A R rFti, MAP NUMBER 27171 CO170D EFFECTIVE DATE JU N E 20, 2024 Federal Emergency Mana-ement AgeneN NOTES TO USERS LEGEND This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. It does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources of small size. The community map repository should be consulted for possible updated or additional flood hazard information. To obtain more detailed information in areas where Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) and/or floodways have been determined, users are encouraged to consult the Flood Profiles and Floodway Data and/or Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables contained within the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report that accompanies this FIRM. Users should be aware that BFEs shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole -foot elevations. These BFEs are intended for flood insurance rating purposes only and should not be used as the sole source of flood elevation information. Accordingly, flood elevation data presented in the FIS Report should be utilized in conjunction with the FIRM for purposes of construction and/or floodplain management. Coastal Base Flood Elevations shown on this map apply only landward of 0.0' North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Users of this FIRM should be aware that coastal flood elevations are also provided in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Elevations shown in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations table should be used for construction and/or floodplain management purposes when they are higher than the elevations shown on this FIRM. Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. Floodway widths and other pertinent Floodway data are provided in the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. Refer to Section 2.4 "Flood Protection Measures" of the Flood Insurance Study Report for information on flood control structures for this jurisdiction. The projection used in the preparation of this map was Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 15. The horizontal datum was NAD 83. GRS 1980 spheroid. Differences in datum, spheroid, projection or UTM zones used in the production of FIRMS for adjacent jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across jurisdiction boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this FIRM. Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. For information regarding conversion between the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988, visit the National Geodetic Survey website at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov or contact the National Geodetic Survey at the following address: NGS Information Services NOAA, N/NGS12 National Geodetic Survey SSMC-3, #9202 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring. Maryland 20910-3282 (301) 713-3242 To obtain current elevation. description, and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, please contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301) 713- 3242, or visit its website at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov. Base map information shown on this FIRM was derived from 6 inch pixel resolution digital ortho imagery for Wright County dated 2008. The profile baselines depicted on this map represent the hydraulic modeling baseline that match the flood profiles in the FIS report. As a result of improved topographic data, the profile baseline, in some cases, may deviate significantly from the channel centerline or appear outside the SFHA. Corporate limits shown on this map are based on the best data available at the time of publication. Because changes due to annexations or de -annexations may have occurred after this map was published, map users should contact appropriate community officials to verify current corporate limit locations. Please refer to the separately printed Map Index for an overview map of the county showing the layout of map panels, community map repository addresses; and a Listing of Communities table containing National Flood Insurance Program dates for each community as well as a listing of the panels on which each community is located. For information on available products associated with this FIRM visit the Map Service Center (MSC) website at http://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the MSC website. If you have questions about this map, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX) at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip. 450 1 �17ooa��I` 5016o00m n 5015000n,N Wright County Unincorporated Area! 270534 City of Monticello 270541 501400amN 5013o0omN 5012000mN 45' 1150 93 442000mE 443000mE 444oaon,E 93' 45' 00" InINIc poNim nonn JUIIVJ t'HINCL U300 4450oan,E 446000mE ^'° ' 9115" 5° 18' 45" SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water -surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AE Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE AR Special Flood Hazard Areas formerly protected from the 1% annual chance flood by a flood control system that was subsequently decertified. Zone AR indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provide protection from the 1% annual chance or greater flood. ZONE A99 Area to be protected from 1% annual chance flood by a Federal flood protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE 105TH The Floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of ST NE encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. OTHER FLOOD AREAS 103RD ST NE 15,001, 93' 41 ' 15" ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible. COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs) CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary 0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary Floodway boundary Zone D boundary ••••••••••••• CBRS and OPAboundary Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Area Zones and boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different Base Flood Elevations, flood depths, or flood velocities. 513Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet` (EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone; elevation in feet* Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 A A Cross section line 23 - - - - - 23 Transect line 45 02' 08", 93' 02' 12" Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) Western Hemisphere 4989000m N 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid values, zone 15 DX5510 X Bench mark (see explanation in Notes to Users section of this FIRM panel) M1.5 River Mile MAP REPOSITORIES Refer to Map Repositories list on Map Index EFFECTIVE DATE OF COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP June 20, 2024 EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping. refer to the Community Map History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community. contact your insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Prooram at 1-800-638-6620. MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 500 0 1000 2000 FEET METERS 300 0 300 600 QD PANEL 0190D FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 190 OF 660 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX MONTICELLO, CITY OF 270541 0190 D OTSEGO, CITY OF 270747 0190 D WRIGHT COUNTY 270534 0190 D Notice to User: The Map Number shown below should be used when placing map orders; the Community Number shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. a�?ARTFti, MAP NUMBER 27171 CO190D EFFECTIVE DATE JU N E 20, 2024 Federal Emergence Management _kgencii WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Name Number *ALBERTVILLE, CITY OF 275256 *ANNANDALE, CITY OF 270665 BUFFALO, CITY OF 270535 CLEARWATER, CITY OF 270536 COKATO, CITY OF 270537 CORINNA, TOWNSHIP OF 270860 DELANO, CITY OF 270539 *HOWARD LAKE, CITY OF 270397 MAPLE LAKE, CITY OF 270667 MONTICELLO, CITY OF 270541 MONTROSE, CITY OF 275257 OTSEGO, CITY OF 270747 *SOUTH HAVEN, CITY OF 275255 ST. MICHAEL, CITY OF 270543 WAVERLY, CITY OF 270666 WRIGHT COUNTY 270534 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IDENTIFIED WRIGHT COUNTY EFFECTIVE: J U N E 20, 2024 OF"e A�RTFtiT Federal Emergency Management Agency 'gND S�L�¢~ FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 27171 CVOOOA NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone(s) New Zone Al through A30 AE B X C X Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: June 20, 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments.................................................................................. 2 1.3 Coordination.................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 AREA STUDIED................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Scope of Study............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Community Description................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Principal Flood Problems............................................................................................... 6 2.4 Flood Protection Measures............................................................................................ 8 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS............................................................................................. 8 3.1 Hydrologic Analyses...................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Hydraulic Analyses....................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Vertical Datum.............................................................................................................. 15 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS..................................................... 18 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries.................................................................................................. 18 4.2 Floodways..................................................................................................................... 19 5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATIONS....................................................................................... 36 6.0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP................................................................................. 37 7.0 OTHER STUDIES.............................................................................................................. 37 8.0 LOCATION OF DATA...................................................................................................... 39 9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES......................................................................... 39 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) FIGURES Figure 1— Floodway Schematic....................................................................................................... 36 TABLES Table 1 — Summary of Discharges....................................................................................................12 Table 2 — Summary of Stillwater Elevations......................................................................................13 Table 3 — Roughness Coefficients (Manning's "n" Values)..............................................................15 Table 4 — Vertical Datum Conversion.............................................................................................. 16 Table 5 — Crow River Datum Conversion........................................................................................ 16 Table6 — Floodway Data.................................................................................................................. 20 Table7 — Community Map History.................................................................................................. 38 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 - Flood Profiles Clearwater River Panels OIP-06P Crow River Panels 07P-11P Mississippi River Panels 12P-19P North Fork Crow River Panels 20P-26P Otter Creek Panel 27P School Lake Creek Panel 28P South Fork Crow River Panels 29P-31P Exhibit 2 - Flood Insurance Rate Map Index Flood Insurance Rate Map ii FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND INCORPORATED AREAS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Study This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) revises and updates information on the existence and severity of flood hazards in the geographic area of Wright County, Minnesota including the Cities of Albertville, Annandale, Buffalo, Clearwater, Cokato, Delano, Howard Lake, Maple Lake, Monticello, Montrose, Otsego, South Haven, St. Michael, and Waverly; the Township of Corinna, and the unincorporated areas of Wright County (referred to collectively herein as Wright County), and aids in the administration of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. This study has developed flood -risk data for various areas of the community that will be used to establish actuarial flood insurance rates and to assist the community in its efforts to promote sound floodplain management. Minimum floodplain management requirements for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) are set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations at 44 CFR, 60.3. Please note that the Cities of Dayton, Hanover and Rockford are geographically located in Wright and Hennepin Counties. These cities are not included in this FIS report. Also, note that the City of Clearwater is geographically located in Wright and Stearns Counties. Only the Wright County portion of the City of Clearwater is included in this FIS report. See the separately published FIS reports and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) for flood hazard information. Please note that the Cities of Albertville, Annandale, Howard Lake, and South Haven have no mapped special flood hazard areas. Special Flood Hazard Areas in the Township of Corinna were previously shown in the unincorporated areas of Wright County until this countywide update. In some states or communities, floodplain management criteria or regulations may exist that are more restrictive or comprehensive than the minimum Federal requirements. In such cases, the more restrictive criteria take precedence and the State (or other jurisdictional agency) will be able to explain them. The Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) and FIS report for this countywide study have been produced in digital format. Flood hazard information was converted to meet the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) DFIRM database specifications and Geographic Information System (GIS) format requirements. The flood hazard information was created and is provided in a digital format so that it can be incorporated into a local GIS and be accessed more easily by the community. 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments The sources of authority for this FIS are the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. Precountywide Analyses Information on the authority and acknowledgements for each jurisdiction included in this countywide FIS, as compiled from their previously printed FIS reports, is shown below: Buffalo, City of The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for Buffalo Lake and Deer Lake and Lake Pulaski for the May 15, 1985, FIS report (FEMA, 1985) were performed by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), for FEMA, under Interagency Agreement No. EMW- 84-E-1548, Project Order No. 01. The work was completed in November 1984. Clearwater, City of The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for Clearwater River and Mississippi River for the May 1979, FIS report were performed by Barr Engineering Co., for the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA), under Contract No. H-3799 (FIA, 1979a). The work was completed in November 1977. Delano, City of The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for South Fork Crow River, FIS report (FIA, 1980) were performed by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), for FIA, under Interagency Agreement No. IAA-H-10-77, Project Order No. 15. The work was completed in December 1977. The revised hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for South Fork Crow River for the December 2, 1988, FIS Report (FEMA, 1988a) were performed for FEMA, under Contract No. EMW-89-E-2978, Project Order No. 5. The work was completed in June 1990. 4 Monticello, City of The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for Mississippi River and Otter Creek for the May 1979, FIS report (FIA, 1979b) were performed by Barr Engineering Co., for FIA, under Contract No. H-3799. The work was completed in November 1977. Otsego, City of The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for Crow River and Mississippi River for the September 30, 1992, FIS report (FEMA, 1992a) were performed by Barr Engineering Co., for FEMA, under Contract No. H3799 / Interagency Agreement No. EMW-84-E-1506, Project Order No. 01. The work was completed June 1986. St. Michael, City of The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for School Lake Creek for the May 1979 FIS report (FIA, 1979c) were performed by Barr Engineering Co., for FIA, under Contract No. H-3799. The work was completed in June 1978. Wright County The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for Buffalo (Unincorporated Areas): Lake, Clearwater River, Crow River, Mississippi River, North Fork Crow River, and South Fork Crow River, for the August 1988, FIS report (FEMA, 1988b) were performed by Barr Engineering Co., for FEMA, under Contract No. H3799 / Interagency Agreement No. EMW-84-E- 1506, Project Order No. 01. The work was completed June 1986. The revised hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for North Fork Crow River and South Fork Crow River for the August 18, 1992, FIS Report (FEMA, 1992b) were performed for FEMA, under Contract No. EMW-89-E-2978, Project Order No. 5. The work was completed in June 1990. The Cities of Albertville, Annandale, Cokato, Howard Lake, Maple Lake, South Haven, and Waverly and the Township of Corinna have no previously printed FIS reports. 3 1.3 This Countywide FIS Report Revised hydrologic and hydraulic analyses were incorporated for the detailed portion of the Clearwater River, from County Highway 75 to approximately 200 feet downstream of Interstate Highway 94 (FEMA, 1994). The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for the streams studied by approximate analysis for this study were performed by Atkins for FEMA, under Contract No. HSFE05-05-D-0023, Task Order 29. The work was completed in February 2011. Base map information shown on the FIRM was derived from six inch pixel resolution digital ortho-imagery for Wright County, dated 2008. The projection used in the preparation of this map is Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), Zone 15, and the horizontal datum used is North American Datum 1983 (NAD83). Coordination An initial meeting is held with representatives from FEMA, the community, and the study contractor to explain the nature and purpose of a FIS, and to identify the streams to be studied or restudied. A final meeting is held with representatives from FEMA, the community, and the study contractor to review the results of the study. Precountywide Analyses The initial and final meeting dates for previous FIS reports for Wright County and its communities are listed in the following table: Community FIS Date Initial Meeting Final Meeting Wright County June 1986 March 1984 July 21, 1987 (Unincorporated Areas) August 18, 1991 Buffalo, City of May 15, 1985 August 1983 January 8, 1985 Clearwater, City of May 1979 July 1977 August 23, 1978 Delano, City of December 2, 1988 August 16, 1976 October 17, 1978 Monticello, City of May 1979 July 1977 October 18, 1978 Otsego, City of September 30, 1992 St. Michael, City of May 1979 June 1977 October 19, 1978 *Data Not Available This Countywide FIS Report The initial meeting was held in May 29, 2008, and attended by representatives of Atkins, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR), FEMA, Wright County and the Cities of Annandale, Clearwater, Delano, Monticello, and Waverly. The results of the study were reviewed at the final meeting held on December 14, 2011, and attended by representatives from FEMA, MNDNR, the National Weather Service, Atkins, Wright County, and the Cities of Buffalo, Delano, Monticello, St. Michael, and Waverly. All issues and/or concerns raised at that meeting have been addressed. C! 2.0 AREA STUDIED 2.1 Scope of Study This FIS covers the geographic area of Wright County, Minnesota, including the incorporated communities listed in Section I.I. The areas studied by detailed methods were selected with priority given to all known flood hazards and areas of projected development or proposed construction through the time of the study. The following lakes and streams are studied by detailed methods in this FIS report: Buffalo Lake Clearwater River Crow River Deer Lake Mississippi River North Fork Crow River Otter Creek School Lake Creek South Fork Crow River The limits of detailed study are indicated on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1) and on the FIRM (Exhibit 2). This Countywide FIS Report Buffalo Lake, Clearwater River, Crow River, Deer Lake, Mississippi River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Creek, School Lake Creek, and South Fork Crow River were redelineated using new topographic data. In addition, revised hydrologic and hydraulic analyses were incorporated for Clearwater River from the confluence with Mississippi River to State Highway 55, and for Mississippi River from approximately 3.7 miles downstream of U.S. Highway 169 to approximately 0.5 miles upstream of State Highway 24 (FEMA, 1994). For this countywide FIS, the FIS report and FIRM were converted to countywide format, and the flooding information for the entire county, including both incorporated and unincorporated areas, is shown. Also, the vertical datum was converted from the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD) to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD). In addition, the Universal Transverse Mercator coordinates, previously referenced to the North American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27), are now referenced to NAD83. Approximate analyses were used to study those areas having low development potential or minimal flood hazards. The scope and methods of study were proposed to and agreed upon by FEMA and Wright County. Crow River has been renamed from Main Stem Crow River, the name by which it was referred in previous studies. E 2.2 Community Description Wright County is located in the northwestern edge of the Minneapolis - St. Paul metropolitan area in central Minnesota. It is bordered by Todd and Morrison Counties to the north, Sherburne County to the northeast, Hennepin County to the east, Carver and McLeod Counties to the south, Meeker County to the west, Stearns County to the northwest. The floodplains throughout Wright County are generally lightly developed; however, development is concentrated in lake shore areas. The county's proximity to the Minneapolis - St. Paul metropolitan area has resulted in increasing development pressure in recent years. The trend is anticipated to continue in the future, particularly in the aesthetically pleasing floodplain areas along the rivers and lakes in the county. The climate classification of Wright County is humid continental with seasonal variations in temperature ranging from 13.5 degrees Fahrenheit (7) in January to 74.3°F in July. The average annual temperature is 44.9°F. The average annual precipitation is approximately 24 inches; the average annual snowfall for Wright County is 45 inches (The Weather Channel, 2010). Land use in Wright County consists primarily of agricultural cropland and meadows. Scattered woodlands occur on farms and along river bottoms. Numerous wetland areas occur throughout the county with characteristic wetland vegetation types. The topographic relief is uniform in Wright County. The landscape can be characterized as gently rolling, with elevations varying from 900 to 1,000 feet across the county and a topographic relief of approximately 40 feet below the adjacent land surface. The Mississippi River and Clearwater River lie in valleys that gradually descend from the adjacent land surfaces. 2.3 Principal Flood Problems The most severe flooding of lakes and rivers in Wright County occur during spring snowmelt-runoff events. Restrictive characteristics of certain man-made structures have, during larger floods of record, caused inundation of land areas. Along the Mississippi River, large floods occurred in 1897, 1950, 1952, 1965, 1969, 1972, 1975, and 1979. The 1965 flood was comparable to approximately a 1-percent- annual-chance frequency flood on the Mississippi River. Detailed information on these floods was recorded by various agencies and by the communities along the rivers. In addition to Spring run-off events, flooding on Otter Creek has also resulted from the occurrence of short -duration, high -intensity rainstorms. Cel For the Clearwater River basin there are limited records of flooding events as no gaging station is available. However, a summer rain storm event in 1983 did cause flooding problems in the Clearwater River basin. Recorded rainfall amounts for the storm of June 21, 1983, averaged 9.19 inches over the watershed. This storm exceeded the 1-percent-annual-chance flood 12-hour storm of 5.1 inches. Historic floods in Wright County have primarily damaged public services facilities such as roads and bridges in the unincorporated areas, while the majority of the structural damage has occurred within the incorporated areas along the rivers. On Crow River, North Fork Crow River, and South Fork Crow River, the largest recorded floods occurred in 1916, 1952, 1957, 1965, and 1969. The 1965 flood was comparable to approximately a 0.5-percent-annual-chance flood along Crow River. The low-lying areas of the City of Delano are subject to periodic overflow from the South Fork Crow River. The most severe flooding results in early spring from heavy rains or a combination of heavy rains and snowmelt. Major floods occurred in 1890, 1897, 1906, 1916, 1952, 1957, 1965, and 1969. The following available discharges and frequencies of the more recent floods were taken at the Bridge Avenue bridge. The 1965 flood had a discharge of 16,700 cubic feet per second (cfs) and an estimated 2-percent annual exceedance probability (50 years). The 1952 flood had a discharge of 10,800 cfs (based on high water marks near the site) and an estimated 5-percent annual exceedance probability (20 years). The 1957 flood had a discharge of 10,400 cfs (based on high water marks near the site) and an estimated annual exceedance probability slightly greater than 5-percent (18 years). The 1969 flood had a discharge of 9,680 cfs and an estimated annual exceedance probability slightly greater than 5-percent (17 years). It is probable that the April 1965 flood had the greatest peak discharge of the floods listed. The most recent large flood at the City of Delano reached a crest elevation of 920.35 feet NAVD with a maximum discharge of 9,680 cfs on April 11, 1969. Buffalo Lake and Deer Lake are connected to North Fork Crow River 2.5 miles to the south through Deer Lake and the valley of Mill Creek and a large marsh. The route for floodwaters to enter Buffalo Lake and Deer Lake has sufficient capacity so that backwater flow from North Fork Crow River readily affects Buffalo Lake and Deer Lake. Flooding on North Fork Crow River occurs frequently and the level of Buffalo Lake and Deer Lake rises and falls with the river. Some of the roadways adjacent to the lake are overtopped during even a moderate flood. 7 2.4 Flood Protection Measures No flood control projects exist in the unincorporated areas of Wright County. Various municipalities in Wright County, do have flood control structures within their boundaries. There are two dams on the Clearwater River: Fairhaven Dam, located approximately 1,200 feet upstream of County Highway 2 in Wright County (Unincorporated Areas); and an unnamed dam, located just downstream of Grass Lake. There is one dam on the Crow River: Berning Mill Dam. These dams provide no flood protection for the county. A pump/pipeline flood control project was constructed by the USACE for Lake Pulaski in late 1986. The goal of the project was to stem the long term increase in lake level that results from the gradual accumulation of surface runoff and from groundwater. Although there are a number of levees located within Wright County providing some level of flood protection, there are no accredited levees within the county providing protection from the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event. 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS For the flooding sources studied by detailed methods in the community, standard hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude that are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the average during any 10-, 50-, 100-, or 500-year period (recurrence interval) have been selected as having special significance for floodplain management and for flood insurance rates. These events, commonly termed the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year floods, have a 10-, 2-, 1-, and 0.2-percent chance, respectively, of being equaled or exceeded during any year. Although the recurrence interval represents the long-term, average period between floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods could occur at short intervals or even within the same year. The risk of experiencing a rare flood increases when periods greater than 1 year are considered. For example, the risk of having a flood that equals or exceeds the 1-percent-annual-chance (100-year) flood in any 50-year period is approximately 40 percent (4 in 10); for any 90-year period, the risk increases to approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The analyses reported herein reflect flooding potentials based on conditions existing in the community at the time of completion of this study. Maps and flood elevations will be amended periodically to reflect future changes. 3.1 Hydrologic Analyses Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish peak discharge -frequency relationships for each flooding source studied by detailed methods affecting the community. Precountywide Analyses For the Clearwater River, discharge frequency relationships were determined by applying the USACE Hydrologic Engineering Center's (HEC) HEC-1 rainfall- runoff computer model (HEC, 1970). The entire watershed above the confluence with the Mississippi River was modeled using thirteen subbasins, nine reservoir routings, and 11 combining units. To obtain Snyder's unit hydrograph parameters, Cp, a coefficient accounting for flood wave and storage conditions, and Ct, a coefficient representing variations of watershed slopes and storage, for the Clearwater River basin, the Crow River, near Regal was used as the two rivers have similar hydrologic characteristics (USACE, 1986). The parameters were determined using the optimization capability in HEC-1 for two selected historic events. A10-day storm duration was selected to insure the most critical duration of storm was modeled for the lakes. The 10-, 2-, 1-, and 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood, 10-day precipitation values were obtained from the National Weather Service's (NWS) Technical Memorandum Hydro-35, Technical Paper No. 40, and Technical Paper No. 49 (NWS, 1961, 1964, and 1977). The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) curve numbers were used to determine rainfall excess. These curve numbers were estimated from information obtained from the Minnesota Land Management Information Center. The HEC-1 model was calibrated to a USGS peak discharge estimated based on a discharge measurement made on the Clearwater River upstream of the State Highway 75 Bridge following the June 21, 1983 storm. This value is believed to be within 0.2 foot of the peak stage with an estimated peak discharge of 2,610 cfs. This storm produced an average rainfall over the watershed of 9.19 inches (USGS, 1985). Three methods were used to validate the peak flow values. The first method used a USACE Open -File report for the City of Clearwater, in which a USGS regression analysis was performed (HEC, 1977 and USACE, 1985). The equations used accounted for basin area, slope, and storage. The second method used updated regression equations that took into account basin area, storage, mean annual runoff, and forest cover (USGS, 1985). The third method used in the final analysis of the Clearwater River was the generalized SCS Technical Release No. 20 model (SCS, 1965). Based on these comparisons, the HEC-1 values were adopted. On the Crow River, discharges were developed at the City of Rockford and at its confluence with the Mississippi River. For the South Fork Crow River, discharges were developed at the Wright County boundary with Carver County and at the confluence of the Crow River. Discharges for Crow River and South Fork Crow River were determined by a statistical analysis of gage information. The discharge -frequency curves at USGS gages on Crow River and South Fork Crow River were developed using USGS Water Resources Council (WRC) Bulletin 17B and the USACE Flood Flow Frequency Analysis (HEC, 1982 and WRC, 1982). For North Fork Crow River, 53 years of USGS gage records were used to define the discharge -frequency relationships. The coordinated discharge -frequency relationship used was based on the discharge -frequency relationship at the confluence of the North Fork Crow River and was transferred upstream using the 0.6 power of the drainage area ratio. X For Otter Creek, discharges were calculated with a regression analysis using Regional Flood Frequency Equations for Minnesota (USGS, 1977). For School Lake Creek, hydrographs were developed for its subwatersheds using the 24-hour duration rainfall event and the unit hydrograph methods of the TR-20 computer program (SCS, 1965). Times of concentration and curve numbers were computed following procedures from the SCS National Engineering Handbook (SCS, 1972), using USGS topographic maps (USGS, 1958), aerial photographs (Mark Hurd Aerial Surveys, Inc., 1975), soil maps (SCS, 1968), field survey data, and field inspection data. Precipitation intensities for the 10-, 2-, and 1-percent- annual-chance flood events were obtained from the Weather bureau TP-40 (NWS, 1961). The 0.2-percent-annual-chance precipitation intensity was estimated by extrapolating the 10-, 2-, and 1-percent-annual-chance intensities on probability paper. Storage -discharge relationships for School Lake Creek were developed using USGS topographic maps (USGS, 1958), field survey data, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Bureau of Public Roads culvert nomographs (USDOT, 1965), and the USACE HEC-2 backwater computer program (HEC, 1977). The hydrology of the Mill Creek basin from Buffalo Lake downstream is overshadowed by backwater from flooding on North Fork Crow River. The normal low level of Buffalo Lake is well below flood level on North Fork Crow River where it passes 2.5 miles to the south. The valley of Mill Creek between Buffalo Lake and the river is large, being approximately 0.25 miles wide between banks of the 920 foot NAVD level. The channel of Mill Creek is below elevation 910.4 feet NAVD through that reach. Thus, floodwaters from North Fork Crow River are readily conveyed up the valley of Mill Creek, through Deer Lake, and into Buffalo Lake. A dam at the county road bridge at the outlet of Deer Lake maintains the low level of Deer Lake and Buffalo Lake at approximately 913.4 feet NAVD. However, floodwaters submerge the dam crest 5 feet during a 10-percent- annual-chance flood and more than 8 feet during the 1-percent-annual-chance flood. Significant differences in elevation between Buffalo Lake and North Fork Crow River cannot develop when the river is in flood because the conveyance of the connecting valley is so large. Lake Pulaski represents the opposite extreme in hydrologic conditions in that it has no outlet and there is no evidence to indicate that overflow has ever occurred (MNDNR, 1981 and USACE, 1984). The total area of the basin of Lake Pulaski is about 4.2 square miles. With the lake comprising 1.2 square miles of the basin, it has been estimated that the area supplying runoff is not large enough to maintain a lake in Minnesota's climate and there must be a significant groundwater contribution (MNDNR, 1984). The opposite argument maintains that if the lake received significant groundwater inflow from a large aquifer, the fluctuation in lake level over the years would not have been as great as has been observed. Nevertheless, the fluctuation in lake level since the area was settled precludes an 10 analysis from which to estimate the 1-percent-annual-chance flood level. The peak level reached in any year is largely dependent upon precipitation and average climate over the basin for the past several years, which determined the elevation at the beginning of the year. To estimate a 1-percent-annual-chance flood level for Lake Pulaski, it was assumed that the lake was at the natural ordinary high-water level of 969.2 feet NAVD and a 1-percent-annual-chance, 10-day rainfall occurred. This results in a rise of 2.2 feet from direct rainfall on the lake and from runoff from the surrounding basin. The resulting elevation for the 1-percent-annual-chance flood on Lake Pulaski is 971.4 feet NAVD. This elevation is used to delineate flooding even though the study method for Lake Pulaski is approximate and flood levels for other recurrence intervals are not estimated (FEMA, 1985). This Countywide FIS Report For the Mississippi River, data for flow -frequency analyses were derived from USGS gaging station records, from a gage located at the downstream side of Parrish Avenue NE in the City of Otsego. Those records were from a time period of July 1915 to October 1956. It was then taken over by the USACE, which continues to obtain miscellaneous peak data at that site. Flood -flow frequency -discharge values were obtained from the USGS for the Mississippi River above and below its confluence with the Elk River. These discharges represent an administrative agreement between USGS and the USACE reached April 5, 1973. WRC Bulletin No. 17 analysis of 45 years of gage data for the Mississippi River at Elk River showed the administrative discharges to fall within 95-percent confidence limits required by FEMA (HEC, 1977 and WRC, 1982). Further, drainage -area -frequency -discharge curves were constructed from discharges obtained from the USGS for six points along the Mississippi River. From these curves, the average drainage area ratio exponent was found to equal 0.64, from the following equation: Q2 = Q1 (A1/A2) x However, the Mississippi River detailed study reaches are located immediately upstream and downstream of the confluence with the Elk River. For the approximate analyses streams, peak discharges were estimated using the published USGS regional regression equations (Lorenz, 2009). Regression equations estimate peak discharges for ungaged streams based on characteristics of nearby gauged streams. Drainage areas were developed from USGS 30-meter Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). Peak discharge -drainage area relationships for each flooding source studied in detail are shown in Table 1. 11 Table 1 - Summary of Discharges Peak Discharges (cubic feet per second) Drainage Area 10-Percent- 2-Percent- 1-Percent- 0.2-Percent- Flooding Source and Location (square miles) Annual -Chance Annual -Chance Annual -Chance Annual -Chance CLEARWATER RIVER At confluence with Mississippi 171.4 740 1310 1,560 2,340 River At 140t�' Street NW 160.2 730 1,280 1,530 2,290 Approximately 8,880 feet 94.0 670 1,110 1,320 2,020 downstream of Pittman Avenue NW At Fairhaven Dam 91.2 640 1,070 1,280 1,940 At State Highway55 81.5 610 1,010 1,190 1,790 CROW RIVER Approximately 2.32 miles 2,760 11,000 22,900 29,500 48,300 downstream of State Highway 101 Approximately 5.02 miles 2,590 9,800 16,600 19,900 27,700 upstream of County Highway 22 Just upstream of State 2,404 9,370 15,900 19,000 26,500 Highway 55 MISSISSIPPI RIVER Just downstream of 14,500 39,300 57,600 66,000 85,500 confluence of Elk River Just upstream of confluence 13,800 36,400 53,300 61,000 79,000 with Elk River Approximately 7.5 miles 13,694 35,800 52,500 60,200 77,900 upstream of State Highway 25 Approximately 1.9 miles 13,616 35,460 52,000 59,570 77,100 downstream of State Highway 24 NORTH FORK CROW RIVER At confluence Crow River 1,250 4,650 8,400 10,300 16,700 Approx 600 ft downstream of 1,028 4,140 7,470 9,160 14,800 State Highway 8 OTTER CREEK At West River Street 12.3 220 360 420 520 SCHOOL LAKE CREEK At confluence with Crow River 10.9 390 465 500 565 SOUTH FORK CROW RIVER At confluence with Crow River 1,134 6,380 11,800 14,400 21,100 At Wright -Carver county 1,080 6,260 11,600 14,100 20,700 boundary Stillwater elevations for Wright County are shown in Table 2. 12 Table 2 — Summary of Stillwater Elevations Water Surface Elevations (Feet NAVD) 10-Percent- 2-Percent- 1-Percent- 0.2-Percent- Flooding Source Annual -Chance Annual -Chance Annual -Chance Annual -Chance BUFFALO LAKE 918.6 921.2 922.1 926.0 DEER LAKE 918.6 921.2 922.1 926.0 3.2 Hydraulic Analyses Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of flooding from the sources studied were carried out to provide estimates of the elevations of floods of the selected recurrence intervals. Users should be aware that flood elevations shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole -foot elevations and may not exactly reflect the elevations shown on the Flood Profiles or in the Floodway Data Table in the FIS report. Flood elevations shown on the FIRM are primarily intended for flood insurance rating purposes. For construction and/or floodplain management purposes, users are cautioned to use the flood elevation data presented in this FIS report in conjunction with the data shown on the FIRM. Precountywide Analyses Cross sections for the channel and overbank portions of Clearwater River, Crow River, and South Fork Crow River were field surveyed. They were located at close intervals upstream and downstream of bridges, culverts, and other structures in order to compute significant backwater effects of these structures. For Otter Creek and School Lake Creek, cross sections used in the analyses were located at close intervals upstream and downstream of bridges and other hydraulic structures to allow computation of the significant backwater effects of these structures. Other cross sections were located along the streams to provide a typical representation of stream valley topography. Data for cross sections on Otter Creek and dimensions and elevations of bridges, culvers, and other obstructions on Otter Creek were obtained by field survey. Starting WSELs were determined using a drainage area ratio of Otter Creek to the Mississippi River of less than 1:50, and the 20-percent-annual chance frequency WSEL was determined for the Mississippi River at the confluence with Otter Creek (MNDNR, 1976). For Crow River, South Fork Crow River, and North Fork Crow River, effective flow areas of the floodplain cross sections, loss coefficients for bridges and other channel obstructions, and channel and overbank roughness coefficients were initially assigned to each cross section based on field inspection. Adjustments were made to the coefficients until the computed high-water profile using HEC-2 13 step -backwater program matched the historic high-water profile of the April 1965 flood on the Mississippi River (HEC, 1977). Starting WSELs for Crow River were derived from a discharge -elevation rating curve from the City of Dayton (FIA, 1978). For South Fork Crow River, they were taken from elevations at the confluence with the Crow River. For Clearwater River, they were derived from a rating curve of discharges versus elevations from the FIS for the City of Clearwater (FIA, 1979a). In that report, the starting water - surface elevation for the 1-percent-annual-chance flood was the 20-percent-annual- chance flood elevation of the Mississippi River (MNDNR, 1976). The 10-, 50-, and 0.2-percent-annual-chance WSELs were determined from corresponding flood elevations on the Mississippi River. The flood level for Buffalo Lake and Deer Lake was estimated based on the detailed study flood levels on the North Fork Crow River. The hydraulic analysis of flow controlling the response of Buffalo Lake to floods of North Fork Crow River was based on area of the constricted opening at the outlet of Deer Lake and observations of flow and water levels during the floods of April and June 1984. Fountain Lake and Pelican Lake have no natural outlets. Therefore, flood levels for the approximate studies of these lakes were estimated based on approximate storage curves and consideration of various runoff events. Flood levels for the approximate studies of Lake Martha and Lake Charlotte were estimated based on an approximate storage -outflow relationship developed for each lake with consideration of various runoff events. No hydraulic analysis of flow was necessary for Lake Pulaski as no channels or stream flow are involved. This Countywide FIS Report During the 1997 analysis, the effective HEC-2 models for the Mississippi River from the Sherburne and Anoka County boundary to the confluence with Clearwater River were revised and the floodway alignment was added (FEMA, 1994). Cross sections for the Mississippi River were obtained from aerial photographs at a scale of 1:12,000 and field surveys (Mark Hurd Aerial Surveys, Inc., 1975). Water -surface elevations of floods of the selected recurrence intervals for the Mississippi River were computed using the USACE, HEC-2 step -backwater computer program (HEC, 1982). For the streams studied by approximate methods, cross section data was obtained from the topography. Roads were modeled as bridges with cross -sections upstream and downstream of the structure. The studied streams were modeled using the USACE, HEC computer program HEC-RAS, version 4.1.0 (HEC, 2010). 14 Channel roughness factors (Mannings "n") used in the hydraulic computations were chosen using field inspection data, USGS topographic maps and aerial photography. The Manning's "n" values for all detailed studied streams are listed in Table 3. Table 3 — Roughness Coefficients (Manning's "n" Values) Stream Channel "n" Overbank "n" Clearwater River 0.036-0.044 0.072-0.088 Crow River 0.030-0.040 0.050-0.150 Mississippi River 0.033-0.036 0.070-0.083 North Fork Crow River 0.020-0.150 0.020-0.150 Otter Creek 0.033-0.100 0.035-0.160 School Lake Creek 0.032-0.580 0.035-0.150 South Fork Crow River 0.030-0.040 0.050-0.150 Locations of selected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses are shown on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1). For stream segments for which a floodway was computed (Section 4.2), selected cross section locations are also shown on the FIRM (Exhibit 2). The profile baselines depicted on the FIRM represent the hydraulic modeling baselines that match the flood profiles on this FIS report. As a result of improved topographic data, the profile baseline, in some cases, may deviate significantly from the channel centerline or appear outside the Special Flood Hazard Area. The hydraulic analyses for this study were based on unobstructed flow. The flood elevations shown on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1) are thus considered valid only if hydraulic structures remain unobstructed, operate properly, and do not fail. 3.3 Vertical Datum All FIS reports and FIRMS are referenced to a specific vertical datum. The vertical datum provides a starting point against which flood, ground, and structure elevations can be referenced and compared. Until recently, the standard vertical datum in use for newly created or revised FIS reports and FIRMS was NGVD. With the finalization of NAVD, many FIS reports and FIRMS are being prepared using NAVD as the referenced vertical datum. All flood elevations shown in this FIS report and on the FIRM, unless otherwise noted, are referenced to NAVD. Structure and ground elevations in the community must, therefore, be referenced to NAVD. It is important to note that adjacent communities may be referenced to NGVD. This may result in differences in Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) across the corporate limits between the communities. Some of the data used in this study were taken from the prior effective FIS reports and adjusted to NAVD. The average conversion factor that 15 was used to convert the data in this FIS report to NAVD was calculated using the National Geodetic Survey's (NGS) VERTCON online utility (NGS, 2009). The data points used to determine the conversion are listed in Table 4. Table 4 — Vertical Datum Conversion Conversion from Quad Name Corner Latitude Longitude NGVD to NAVD Albion Center SE 45.125 -94.000 0.312 Annandale SE 45.250 -94.000 0.361 Big Lake SE 45.250 -93.625 0.384 Buffalo East SE 45.125 -93.750 0.308 Buffalo West SE 45.125 -93.875 0.322 Clear Lake SE 45.375 -93.875 0.397 Clearwater SE 45.375 -94.000 0.384 Cokato SE 45.000 -94.125 0.364 Dassel SE 45.000 -94.250 0.397 Delano SE 45.000 -93.750 0.259 Elk River SE 45.250 -93.500 0.371 French Lake SE 45.125 -94.125 0.305 Howard Lake SE 45.000 -94.000 0.315 Kimball SE 45.250 -94.250 0.518 Kingston SE 45.125 -94.250 0.358 Monticello SE 45.250 -93.750 0.328 Saint Augusta SE 45.375 -94.125 0.427 Silver Creek SE 45.250 -93.875 0.331 South Haven SE 45.250 -94.125 0.427 Waverly SE 45.000 -93.875 0.295 Average: 0.358 For the Crow River, datum conversions were calculated at the location of each lettered cross section using the National Geodetic Survey's VERTCON online utility (NGS, 2009). This results in a rolling conversion factor for the Crow River as listed in Table 5. Table 5 — Crow River Datum Conversion Cross NGVD to NAVD Section Latitude Longitude Elevation Change(feet) A 45.244 -93.522 0.377 B 45.243 -93.521 0.377 C 45.238 -93.520 0.377 D 45.234 -93.521 0.377 E 45.231 -93.526 0.377 F 45.225 -93.526 0.377 G 45.222 -93.529 0.377 16 Table 5 - Crow River Datum Conversion (continued) Cross NGVD to NAVD Section Latitude Longitude Elevation Change(feet) H 45.226 -93.534 0.381 1 45.231 -93.536 0.381 J 45.230 -93.545 0.381 K 45.227 -93.548 0.381 L 45.225 -93.557 0.381 M 45.223 -93.563 0.381 N 45.219 -93.571 0.377 O 45.219 -93.575 0.377 P 45.218 -93.578 0.374 Q 45.215 -93.594 0.367 R 45.209 -93.595 0.364 S 45.208 -93.600 0.361 T 45.212 -93.603 0.364 U 45.210 -93.609 0.361 V 45.203 -93.624 0.348 W 45.203 -93.631 0.344 X 45.210 -93.638 0.348 Y 45.205 -93.643 0.341 Z 45.201 -93.645 0.338 AA 45.199 -93.648 0.335 AB 45.199 -93.655 0.335 AC 45.195 -93.658 0.331 AD 45.189 -93.657 0.331 AE 45.181 -93.649 0.328 AF 45.179 -93.646 0.328 AG 45.179 -93.644 0.328 AH 45.150 -93.684 0.315 Al 45.144 -93.689 0.312 AJ 45.131 -93.703 0.305 AK 45.124 -93.710 0.305 AL 45.118 -93.717 0.302 AM 45.110 -93.722 0.299 For Clearwater River, a datum conversion of +0.553 was used to be consistent with data presented in the FIS for Stearns County, Minnesota and Incorporated Areas. For additional information regarding conversion between NGVD and NAVD, visit the NGS website at www.n s�gov. Temporary vertical monuments are often established during the preparation of a flood hazard analysis for the purpose of establishing local vertical control. 17 Although these monuments are not shown on the FIRM, they may be found in the Technical Support Data Notebook associated with the FIS report and FIRM for this community. Interested individuals may contact FEMA to access these data. To obtain current elevation, description, and/or location information for benchmarks shown on this map, please contact the Information Services Branch of the NGS at (301) 713-3242, or visit their website at www.ngs.noaa.gov. 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS The NFIP encourages State and local governments to adopt sound floodplain management programs. Therefore, each FIS provides 1-percent-annual-chance (100-year) flood elevations and delineations of the 1- and 0.2-percent-annual-chance (500-year) floodplain boundaries and 1-percent-annual-chance floodway to assist communities in developing floodplain management measures. This information is presented on the FIRM and in many components of the FIS report, including Flood Profiles, Floodway Data Table, and Summary of Stillwater Elevations Table. Users should reference the data presented in the FIS report as well as additional information that may be available at the local map repository before making flood elevation and/or floodplain boundary determinations. 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries To provide a national standard without regional discrimination, the 1-percent- annual-chance flood has been adopted by FEMA as the base flood for floodplain management purposes. The 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood is employed to indicate additional areas of flood risk in the community. For each stream studied by detailed methods, the 1- and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries have been delineated using the flood elevations determined at each cross section. Between cross sections, the boundaries were interpolated using topographic maps, with a contour interval of 2 feet, derived from Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR), provided by MNDNR (MNDNR, 2008). For School Lake Creek, from approximately 1,700 feet downstream of Meadowlark Road SE, to approximately 275 feet upstream of Lincoln Drive, the l- and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries have been delineated between cross sections using photogrammetric methods with aerial photographs taken in May 1975 (Mark Hurd Aerial Surveys, Inc., 1975). The 1- and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries are shown on the FIRM (Exhibit 2). On this map, the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundary corresponds to the boundary of the areas of special flood hazards (Zones A and AE) and the 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundary corresponds to the boundary of areas of moderate flood hazards. In cases where the 1- and 0.2- percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries are close together, only the 1- IN percent -annual -chance floodplain boundary has been shown. Small areas within the floodplain boundaries may lie above the flood elevations but cannot be shown due to limitations of the map scale and/or lack of detailed topographic data. For the streams studied by approximate methods, only the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundary is shown on the FIRM (Exhibit 2). 4.2 Floodways Encroachment on floodplains, such as structures and fill, reduces flood -carrying capacity, increases flood heights and velocities, and increases flood hazards in areas beyond the encroachment itself. One aspect of floodplain management involves balancing the economic gain from floodplain development against the resulting increase in flood hazard. For purposes of the NFIP, a floodway is used as a tool to assist local communities in this aspect of floodplain management. Under this concept, the area of the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain is divided into a floodway and a floodway fringe. The floodway is the channel of a stream, plus any adjacent floodplain areas, that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1- percent-annual-chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. Minimum Federal standards limit such increases to 1 foot, provided that hazardous velocities are not produced. The floodways in this study are presented to local agencies as minimum standards that can be adopted directly or that can be used as a basis for additional floodway studies. In Minnesota, however, floodplain encroachment is limited by Minnesota Regulations to that which would cause a 0.5-foot increase in flood heights above pre-floodway conditions at any point (MNDNR, 1977). Floodways having no more than 0.5-foot surcharge were delineated for this FIS. The floodway can be adopted directly or that can be used as a basis for additional floodway studies. The floodways presented in this FIS report and on the FIRM were computed for certain stream segments on the basis of equal -conveyance reduction from each side of the floodplain. Floodway widths were computed at cross sections. Between cross sections, the floodway boundaries were interpolated. The results of the floodway computations have been tabulated for selected cross sections in Table 6. In cases where the floodway and 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries are either close together or collinear, only the floodway boundary has been shown. 19 Table 6 - Floodway Data FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 2 SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) CLEARWATER RIVER A 925 340/1973 403 3.9 948.8 939.85 940.2 0.4 B 1,315 220/150 2,259 0.7 955.3 955.3 955.8 0.5 C 1,785 314/93 2,435 0.6 955.3 955.3 955.8 0.5 D 2,625 200/145 1,431 1.1 124 955.4 955.4 955.8 0.4 E 3,830 194/121 1,681 0.9 136 955.9 955.9 956.3 0.4 F 4,855 142/24 819 1.9 956.3 956.3 956.8 0.5 G 5,900 118/58 538 2.9 957.2 957.2 957.6 0.4 H 6,800 220/80 770 2.0 959.2 959.2 959.7 0.5 1 7,410 20/10 180 8.5 960.9 960.9 961.1 0.2 J 8,690 302/1714 1.8 963.2 963.2 963.3 0.1 K 11,480 95/514 6.4 75 965.5 965.5 965.5 0.0 L 12,960 304/2044 3.2 968.3 968.3 968.8 0.5 M 14,170 60/30 360 4.3 969.8 969.8 970.2 0.4 N 16,570 322/744 2.2 190 972.9 972.9 972.9 0.0 O 18,830 88/514 0.8 590 973.9 973.9 973.9 0.0 P 20,890 220/160 590 2.7 974.7 974.7 974.7 0.0 Q 22,300 125/384 1.4 270 975.7 975.7 976.1 0.4 R 24,760 420/50 1,270 1.2 976.7 976.7 977.1 0.4 S 26,610 570/192 1,150 1.4 977.7 977.7 977.9 0.2 T 28,005 570/61 1,420 1.1 979.0 979.0 979.2 0.2 *Data not computed 'Feet above confluence with Mississippi River 2Total width / Width within county boundary FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY pip WRIGHT COUNTY, MN rn AND INCORPORATED AREAS 2!z 3Floodway widened to contain open channel 4Administrative Floodway 5Elevation computed without consideration of backwater effects from Mississippi River FLOODWAY DATA CLEARWATER RIVER 20 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 2 SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) CLEARWATER RIVER (CONTINUED) U 31,075 110/35 400 3.9 981.4 981.4 981.5 0.1 V 32,995 420/50 1,470 1.1 982.7 982.7 983.1 0.4 W 34,875 555/435 1,110 1.4 983.6 983.6 984.0 0.4 X 36,925 500/312 1,250 1.3 50 985.4 985.4 985.5 0.1 Y 38,675 560/110 1,200 1.3 986.5 986.5 986.5 0.0 Z 39,965 640/497 1,170 1.3 987.4 987.4 987.4 0.0 AA 42,345 250/70 700 2.2 989.0 989.0 989.0 0.0 AB 43,705 230/160 760 2.0 990.0 990.0 990.1 0.1 AC 44,975 258/1143 3.1 991.1 991.1 991.5 0.4 AD 45,545 120/20 420 3.7 992.4 992.4 992.8 0.4 AE 47,545 390/244 1,570 1.0 993.9 993.9 994.1 0.2 AF 48,525 90/90 450 3.4 994.1 994.1 994.3 0.2 AG 49,485 180/90 980 1.6 994.8 994.8 995.1 0.3 AH 50,375 190/25 1,040 1.5 995.0 995.0 995.4 0.4 Al 53,005 820/60 4,490 0.3 995.2 995.2 995.6 0.4 AJ 55,665 720/139 3,540 0.4 995.3 995.3 995.7 0.4 AK 56,605 720/264 3,860 0.4 995.3 995.3 995.7 0.4 AL 57,765 490/80 2,660 0.6 995.4 995.4 995.8 0.4 AM 59,975 100/50 570 2.7 995.6 995.6 995.9 0.3 AN 62,565 280/175 870 1.8 996.1 996.1 996.4 0.3 *Data not computed 'Feet above confluence with Mississippi River 2Total width / Width within county boundary (unless otherwise noted) FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY D WRIGHT COUNTY, MN r AND INCORPORATED AREAS M M 3Administrative Floodway FLOODWAY DATA CLEARWATER RIVER 21 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 2 SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) CLEARWATER RIVER (CONTINUED) AO 76,505 460/60 2,070 0.6 996.8 996.8 997.3 0.5 AP 77,875 430/250 2,390 0.6 997.0 997.0 997.5 0.5 AQ 80,735 1,344/4973 14,580 0.1 997.0 997.0 997.5 0.5 AR 82,605 320/130 1,890 0.7 997.0 997.0 997.5 0.5 AS 85,285 340/220 1,970 0.7 997.1 997.1 997.5 0.4 AT 87,945 150/80 1,450 0.9 997.2 997.2 997.6 0.4 AU 89,715 120/117 1,340 1.0 997.2 997.2 997.6 0.4 AV 91,965 340/190 3,640 0.4 997.3 997.3 997.7 0.4 AW 96,365 1,200/3864 0.2 85 997.3 997.3 997.7 0.4 AX 97,435 220/100 620 2.1 997.3 997.3 997.7 0.4 AY 98,285 70/30 370 3.6 998.5 998.5 998.6 0.1 AZ 98,750 130/110 380 3.4 1,000.1 1,000.1 1,000.1 0.0 BA 99,485 210/165 910 1.5 1,001.7 1,001.7 1,001.7 0.0 BB 100,185 190/100 1,580 0.8 1,009.4 1,009.4 1,009.4 0.0 BC 102,865 437/1253 2,960 0.4 1,009.5 1,009.5 1,009.5 0.0 BD 106,215 390/130 2,940 0.4 1,009.5 1,009.5 1,009.5 0.0 BE 106,975 300/100 1,830 0.7 1,009.5 1,009.5 1,009.5 0.0 BF 110,225 560/290 9,880 0.1 1,009.5 1,009.5 1,009.5 0.0 BG 112,665 860/308 5,740 0.2 1,009.5 1,009.5 1,009.5 0.0 *Data not computed 'Feet above confluence with Mississippi River 2Total width / Width within county boundary FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY pD0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MN r AND INCORPORATED AREAS M M 3Floodway widened to contain open channel 4Administrative Floodway FLOODWAY DATA CLEARWATER RIVER 22 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH (FEET) AREA (SQUARE VELOCITY (FEET PER REDUCED FROM PRIOR REGULATORY (FEET NAVD) FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) CLEARWATER RIVER (CONTINUED) BH 115,915 694/4052'3 1,330 1.0 1,009.5 1,009.5 1,009.5 0.0 BI 116,815 180 450 2.9 1,010.4 1,010.4 1,010.6 0.2 BJ 117,455 100 330 4.0 1,012.3 1,012.3 1,012.7 0.4 BK 118,945 80 320 4.1 1,016.3 1,016.3 1,016.3 0.0 BL 122,365 5504 2.7 1,021.3 1,021.3 1,021.4 0.1 BM 124,545 130 550 2.4 1,024.5 1,024.5 1,024.5 0.0 BN 126,065 350 1,330 1.0 1,025.1 1,025.1 1,025.1 0.0 BO 127,165 50 310 4.2 1,025.5 1,025.5 1,025.5 0.0 BP 128,345 300 1,020 1.3 1,026.4 1,026.4 1,026.5 0.1 BQ 129,345 80 480 2.7 1,027.2 1,027.2 1,027.6 0.4 BR 131,465 350 1,570 0.8 1,027.9 1,027.9 1,028.3 0.4 BS 133,135 130 680 1.9 1,028.2 1,028.2 1,028.5 0.3 BT 134,520 80 420 3.2 1,029.1 1,029.1 1,029.4 0.3 BU 135,065 1104 3.4 1,030.4 1,030.4 1,030.6 0.2 BV 136,465 2253 1,370 1.0 1,030.7 1,030.7 1,031.0 0.3 *Data not computed 'Feet above confluence with Mississippi River 2Total width / Width within county boundary FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY D WRIGHT COUNTY, MN r AND INCORPORATED AREAS M M 3Floodway widened to contain open channel 4Administrative Floodway FLOODWAY DATA CLEARWATER RIVER 23 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 2 SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) FEET (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) CROW RIVER A 767 304/171 5,158 3.9 112 858.3 858.3 858.8 0.5 B 1,477 446/213 5,593 3.6 16 858.5 858.5 858.9 0.4 C 5,007 883/1063 8,289 2.4 859.3 859.3 859.7 0.4 D 6,767 752/260 6,123 3.3 859.7 859.7 860.0 0.3 E 8,507 475/106 5,022 4.0 860.2 860.2 860.5 0.3 F 10,547 649/500 5,254 3.8 861.0 861.0 861.3 0.3 G 12,037 732/669 5,179 3.9 289 861.6 861.6 861.9 0.3 H 13,777 224/176 3,388 5.9 862.4 862.4 862.7 0.3 1 16,267 480/154 3,487 5.7 108 863.8 863.8 864.1 0.3 1 19,277 936/241 9,264 2.1 31 865.6 865.6 865.7 0.1 K 20,747 850/634 7,379 2.7 866.0 866.0 866.1 0.1 L 23,457 450/349 4,884 4.1 867.0 867.0 867.1 0.1 M 26,817 595/471 5,410 3.7 868.5 868.5 868.7 0.2 N 29,357 422/287 5,381 3.7 869.5 869.5 869.7 0.2 Q 30,327 339/118 6,250 3.2 71 869.7 869.7 869.9 0.2 P 31,317 284/208 5,585 3.5 17 869.8 869.8 870.0 0.2 Q 35,267 392/0 4,899 4.0 871.0 871.0 871.3 0.3 R 37,462 215/117 3,083 6.4 26 871.9 871.9 872.1 0.2 S 38,802 859/589 11,745 1.7 873.0 873.0 873.2 0.2 T 40,662 1,018/141 11,983 1.7 873.1 873.1 873.4 0.3 U 43,412 2,500/1,420 33,354 0.6 873.2 873.2 873.5 0.3 V 52,702 1,900/1,718 10,356 1.9 875.2 875.2 875.2 0.0 W 54,582 1,378/1,256 4,972 4.0 875.6 875.6 875.6 0.0 'Feet above confluence with Mississippi River 2Total width / Width within county boundary, unless otherwise noted FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY pDp WRIGHT COUNTY, MN r AND INCORPORATED AREAS m 0) 3Total width / Width within county boundary, excluding City of Dayton (area not included) FLOODWAY DATA CROW RIVER 24 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 2 SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) CROW RIVER (CONTINUED) X 57,842 508/140 4,123 4.8 878.4 878.4 878.5 0.1 Y 60,462 663/566 4,298 4.6 880.5 880.5 880.5 0.0 Z 62,402 372/225 3,712 5.3 881.8 881.8 881.9 0.1 AA 63,102 243/189 3,282 6.0 3 882.2 882.2 882.5 0.3 AB 64,892 707/113 6,400 3.1 17 883.4 883.4 883.7 0.3 AC 66,532 664/180 4,998 3.9 883.9 883.9 884.1 0.2 AD 69,122 404/283 4,447 4.4 885.1 885.1 885.2 0.1 AE 72,822 367/175 3,740 5.2 44 886.8 886.8 886.9 0.1 AF 73,662 600/89 6,493 3.0 887.5 887.5 887.6 0.1 AG 74,262 653/308 5,617 3.5 887.6 887.6 887.7 0.1 AH 93,468 890/311 6,929 2.8 901.0 901.0 901.0 0.0 Al 96,428 676/286 5,218 3.7 901.8 901.8 901.9 0.1 AJ 102,528 732/197 5,851 3.3 903.8 903.8 903.8 0.0 AK 105,608 258/68 3,009 6.4 904.7 904.7 904.8 0.1 AL 108,708 266/176 3,100 6.2 906.5 906.5 906.6 0.1 AM 111,828 327/161 4,489 4.3 104 908.0 908.0 908.1 0.1 'Feet above confluence with Mississippi River 2Total width / Width within county boundary FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY 001 WRIGHT COUNTY, MN rn AND INCORPORATED AREAS m FLOODWAY DATA CROW RIVER 25 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 2 SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) MISSISSIPPI RIVER A 2,550 1,184/309 14,388 4.6 857.4 857.4 857.8 0.4 B 4,260 2,024/1,342 27,389 2.4 858.0 858.0 858.4 0.4 C 6,100 2,221/1,608 23,559 2.8 858.2 858.2 858.6 0.4 D 8,420 857/416 12,168 5.4 858.5 858.5 858.8 0.3 E 10,490 716/323 10,432 6.3 859.1 859.1 859.4 0.3 F 12,600 778/408 10,585 6.3 860.0 860.0 860.2 0.2 G 14,800 1,366/292 14,335 4.6 861.0 861.0 861.2 0.2 H 17,520 964/525 12,036 5.4 861.6 861.6 861.8 0.2 1 19,980 724/252 11,606 5.7 862.3 862.3 862.5 0.2 J 21,580 1,183/454 15,422 4.3 862.8 862.8 863.0 0.2 K 22,570 732/226 11,519 5.7 42 863.4 863.4 863.5 0.1 L 24,240 643/259 9,890 6.7 863.9 863.9 864.0 0.1 M 25,640 806/462 12,056 5.5 864.7 864.7 864.8 0.1 N 27,130 414/223 8,376 7.9 864.9 864.9 865.0 0.1 O 28,640 1,121 /876 17,755 3.7 866.4 866.4 866.5 0.1 P 32,130 2,852/832 23,392 2.6 867.0 867.0 867.3 0.3 Q 34,270 2,942/1,422 22,681 2.7 867.6 867.6 868.0 0.4 R 35,760 2,170/670 21,396 2.9 868.0 868.0 868.3 0.3 S 36,940 2,223/769 15,762 3.9 868.2 868.2 868.5 0.3 T 38,320 974/257 11,821 5.2 868.6 868.6 869.0 0.4 'Feet above Anoka / Sherburne County boundary 2Total width / Width within county boundary FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY pDp WRIGHT COUNTY, MN m AND INCORPORATED AREAS 01 FLOODWAY DATA MISSISSIPPI RIVER 26 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 2 SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) MISSISSIPPI RIVER (CONTINUED) U 40,300 619/179 8,877 6.9 869.5 869.5 869.8 0.3 V 42,450 645/352 8,313 7.3 870.6 870.6 870.9 0.3 W 44,630 734/452 10,334 5.9 188 872.3 872.3 872.5 0.2 X 45,895 1,927/1,265 19,255 3.2 873.3 873.3 873.4 0.1 Y 47,885 828/591 9,389 6.5 873.8 873.8 873.9 0.1 Z 49,425 660/194 8,426 7.2 874.4 874.4 874.5 0.1 AA 51,245 933/363 8,739 7.0 44 875.5 875.5 875.6 0.1 AB 53,485 668/318 7,553 8.1 876.7 876.7 876.7 0.0 AC 55,225 1,460/232 13,276 4.6 878.6 878.6 878.6 0.0 AD 57,305 1,881/381 13,851 4.4 130 880.3 880.3 880.3 0.0 AE 59,695 616/294 7,921 7.7 882.2 882.2 882.2 0.0 AF 61,625 539/147 7,291 8.4 884.4 884.4 884.4 0.0 AG 66,645 719/150 9,588 6.4 47 888.3 888.3 888.4 0.1 AH 70,145 1,814/1,019 13,864 4.4 891.1 891.1 891.1 0.0 Al 73,145 756/393 9,649 6.3 1 892.9 892.9 892.9 0.0 AJ 78,145 731 /335 8,330 7.3 16 895.4 895.4 895.4 0.0 AK 82,945 563/165 6,185 9.8 899.3 899.3 899.3 0.0 AL 87,945 523/120 7,122 8.5 904.2 904.2 904.2 0.0 AM 90,045 590/275 6,986 8.7 905.8 905.8 905.8 0.0 AN 92,045 927/537 11,173 5.4 907.6 907.6 907.6 0.0 'Feet above Anoka / Sherburne County boundary 2Total width / Width within county boundary FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY pDp WRIGHT COUNTY, MN m AND INCORPORATED AREAS 01 FLOODWAY DATA MISSISSIPPI RIVER 27 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 2 SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) MISSISSIPPI RIVER (CONTINUED) AO 129,205 490/87 9,514 6.4 933.5 933.5 933.7 0.2 AP 130,995 550/133 10,054 6.0 934.3 934.3 934.5 0.2 AQ 133,215 611 /198 11,003 5.5 935.2 935.2 935.4 0.2 AR 135,015 605/355 12,743 4.7 122 935.9 935.9 936.1 0.2 AS 137,255 1,062/317 18,448 3.3 936.5 936.5 936.7 0.2 AT 138,305 835/483 13,433 4.5 936.6 936.6 936.8 0.2 AU 139,675 1,114/510 16,706 3.6 937.1 937.1 937.3 0.2 AV 141,565 670/309 11,116 5.4 937.4 937.4 937.6 0.2 AW 143,275 555/248 8,512 7.1 938.0 938.0 938.2 0.2 AX 145,255 889/421 13,779 4.4 55 939.4 939.4 939.6 0.2 AY 146,925 1,135/222 14,114 4.3 939.8 939.8 940.0 0.2 AZ 148,675 1,000/232 12,273 4.9 940.3 940.3 940.6 0.3 BA 151,125 1,923/1,401 24,720 2.4 20 941.2 941.2 941.5 0.3 BB 152,945 818/530 13,040 4.6 941.4 941.4 941.7 0.3 BC 154,195 713/285 13,052 4.6 20 941.8 941.8 942.1 0.3 BD 155,945 720/189 11,904 5.1 942.2 942.2 942.5 0.3 BE 157,735 748/355 11,820 5.1 122 942.7 942.7 943.0 0.3 BF 159,535 786/431 13,571 4.4 943.4 943.4 943.7 0.3 BG 161,285 669/322 12,648 4.8 943.8 943.8 944.1 0.3 'Feet above Anoka / Sherburne County boundary 2Total width / Width within county boundary FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY pDp WRIGHT COUNTY, MN m AND INCORPORATED AREAS 01 FLOODWAY DATA MISSISSIPPI RIVER 28 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 2 SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) MISSISSIPPI RIVER (CONTINUED) BH 163,085 861/542 15,564 3.9 207 944.3 944.3 944.6 0.3 BI 164,685 1,146/938 14,145 4.2 944.6 944.6 944.9 0.3 BJ 165,935 1,093/422 19,239 3.1 945.1 945.1 945.4 0.3 BK 168,365 2,656/2,060 23,305 2.6 945.3 945.3 945.6 0.3 BL 170,465 2,200/832 19,960 3.0 945.6 945.6 945.9 0.3 BM 172,415 1,732/592 16,188 3.7 68 946.0 946.0 946.3 0.3 BN 174,315 1,488/441 16,752 3.6 946.6 946.6 947.0 0.4 BO 176,145 1,250/895 16,798 3.6 947.0 947.0 947.4 0.4 BP 177,345 900/676 13,129 4.5 947.2 947.2 947.6 0.4 BQ 179,175 783/691 13,440 4.4 947.6 947.6 948.0 0.4 BR 180,535 784/784 15,260 3.9 20 948.4 948.4 948.8 0.4 BS 182,235 646/383 11,490 5.2 58 948.5 948.5 948.9 0.4 'Feet above Anoka / Sherburne County boundary 2Total width / Width within county boundary FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY D WRIGHT COUNTY, MN r AND INCORPORATED AREAS m a� FLOODWAY DATA MISSISSIPPI RIVER 29 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) NORTH FORK CROW RIVER A 686 1,890 21,240 0.5 914.9 914.52 914.52 0.0 B 4,936 718 4,619 2.2 914.9 914.52 914.52 0.0 C 8,036 763 8,580 1.2 914.9 914.82 914.82 0.0 D 9,336 760 9,553 1.1 914.9 914.82 914.92 0.1 E 10,836 530 6,120 1.7 914.9 914.92 914.92 0.0 F 11,722 398 3,774 2.7 23 914.9 914.9 915.0 0.1 G 14,097 855 9,641 1.1 915.3 915.3 915.4 0.1 H 19,197 508 6,135 1.7 915.5 915.5 915.6 0.1 1 21,197 870 10,150 1.0 915.6 915.6 915.7 0.1 1 22,847 2,087 23,363 0.4 915.7 915.7 915.8 0.1 K 26,097 4,880 55,574 0.2 915.7 915.7 915.8 0.1 L 29,597 3,900 33,933 0.3 915.7 915.7 915.8 0.1 M 36,023 4,500 39,259 0.3 915.7 915.7 915.8 0.1 N 40,873 941 7,896 1.3 915.7 915.7 915.8 0.1 O 47,273 3,069 16,852 0.6 916.2 916.2 916.4 0.2 P 50,773 643 3,444 2.9 916.6 916.6 916.7 0.1 Q 55,413 430 3,803 2.6 918.4 918.4 918.7 0.3 R 57,588 1,250 9,937 1.0 919.0 919.0 919.3 0.3 S 60,338 1,3403 9,946 1.0 919.2 919.2 919.6 0.4 T 74,253 8073 2,145 4.4 923.6 923.6 923.7 0.1 'Feet above confluence with Crow River 2Elevation computed without consideration of backwater effects from Crow River 3Mapped topwidth differs from Floodway Data table width due to presence of high ground/divided flow FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOODWAY DATA 001 WRIGHT COUNTY, MN r AND INCORPORATED AREAS M NORTH FORK CROW RIVER an 30 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) NORTH FORK CROW RIVER (CONTINUED) U 79,053 1,6702 14,203 0.7 924.1 924.1 924.4 0.3 V 83,903 5,150 40,916 0.2 924.1 924.1 924.4 0.3 W 90,353 4,100 22,601 0.4 924.2 924.2 924.4 0.2 X 93,853 3,325 13,066 0.7 924.7 924.7 924.9 0.2 Y 99,053 1,185 1,393 6.8 273 924.7 924.7 924.9 0.2 Z 105,521 399 2,969 3.2 932.4 932.4 932.5 0.1 AA 110,321 2,650 22,103 0.4 933.1 933.1 933.4 0.3 AB 118,321 2,300 13,928 0.7 933.1 933.1 933.6 0.5 AC 121,621 1,920 9,053 1.0 933.3 933.3 933.7 0.4 AD 126,371 1,490 6,138 1.5 933.9 933.9 934.4 0.5 AE 134,659 1,555 5,284 1.7 935.6 935.6 935.9 0.3 'Feet above confluence with Crow River 2Mapped topwidth differs from Floodway Data table width due to presence of high ground/divided flow FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOODWAY DATA pDp WRIGHT COUNTY, MN r AND INCORPORATED AREAS m NORTH FORK CROW RIVER M 31 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) OTTER CREEK A 80 70 245 1.7 910.3 904.32 904.82 0.5 B 250 30 75 5.6 910.3 904.32 904.82 0.5 C 610 30 60 7.0 910.3 910.02 910.02 0.0 D 1,440 70 300 1.4 913.7 913.7 914.2 0.5 E 1,850 70 225 1.9 914.2 914.2 914.7 0.5 F 2,290 70 165 2.5 915.6 915.6 916.1 0.5 G 2,730 50 175 2.4 917.1 917.1 917.6 0.5 H 3,510 40 170 2.5 920.4 920.4 920.6 0.2 1 3,990 40 140 3.0 921.0 921.0 921.5 0.5 J 4,200 50 180 2.3 921.4 921.4 921.9 0.5 K 4,480 60 220 1.9 922.1 922.1 922.6 0.5 L 4,710 90 315 1.3 922.3 922.3 922.8 0.5 M 5,110 170 565 0.7 922.5 922.5 923.0 0.5 N 5,350 1343 205 2.0 922.8 922.8 923.3 0.5 O 5,860 70 175 2.4 923.6 923.6 924.0 0.4 'Feet above confluence with Mississippi River 2Elevation computed without consideration of backwater effects from Mississippi River 3Floodway widened to contain open channel D r M a) FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY WRIGHT COUNTY, MN AND INCORPORATED AREAS FLOODWAY DATA OTTER CREEK 32 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION WIDTH SECTION AREA MEAN VELOCITY REGULATORY WITHOUT WITH INCREASE CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' (FEET) (SQUARE FEET) (FEET PER (FEET NAVD) FLOODWAY FLOODWAY (FEET) SECOND) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) SCHOOL LAKE CREEK A 1,980 30 85 5.9 885.4 885.4 885.5 0.1 B 2,485 60 125 4.1 888.4 888.4 888.5 0.1 C 3,170 40 85 5.9 893.1 893.1 893.1 0.0 D 4,180 30 140 3.5 898.5 898.5 898.6 0.1 E 4,925 25 80 6.2 900.3 900.3 900.4 0.1 F 6,695 30 95 5.3 909.4 909.4 909.4 0.0 G 8,415 30 160 3.1 917.7 917.7 918.0 0.3 H 8,620 40 450 1.1 926.1 926.1 926.2 0.1 1 10,045 60 225 2.2 926.2 926.2 926.4 0.2 J 10,880 90 530 0.9 926.2 926.2 926.7 0.5 K 11,620 130 460 1.1 926.4 926.4 926.9 0.5 'Feet above confluence with Crow River FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY pDp WRIGHT COUNTY, MN m AND INCORPORATED AREAS m FLOODWAY DATA SCHOOL LAKE CREEK 33 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) SOUTH FORK CROW RIVER A 686 1,530/8442 12,899 1.1 914.9 914.9 914.9 0.0 B 1,436 1,245/1,1832 12,536 1.1 914.9 914.9 914.9 0.0 C 6,188 1,130/5042 11,391 1.3 915.0 915.0 915.0 0.0 D 8,886 1,283/1,1652 10,281 1.4 915.2 915.2 915.2 0.0 E 12,635 1,209/1,1482 4,815 3.0 121 915.7 915.7 915.8 0.1 F 15,138 1,040 6,362 2.3 916.8 916.8 916.9 0.1 G 18,459 479 3,843 3.7 88 918.0 918.0 918.1 0.1 H 19,705 880 7,072 2.0 918.7 918.7 918.8 0.1 1 21,606 2,409 12,223 1.2 919.0 919.0 919.1 0.1 1 25,106 2,572 19,015 0.8 25 919.2 919.2 919.3 0.1 K 28,105 1,319 9,277 1.5 57 919.3 919.3 919.4 0.1 L 28,805 231 2,412 6.0 37 919.4 919.4 919.5 0.1 M 30,175 171 2,712 5.3 19 921.2 921.2 921.2 0.0 N 30,430 187 2,323 6.2 921.7 921.7 921.8 0.1 O 30,835 185 2,150 6.7 922.0 922.0 922.0 0.0 P 31,340 158 2,212 6.5 31 922.4 922.4 922.4 0.0 Q 31,830 230 2,606 5.5 922.7 922.7 922.7 0.0 R 32,240 180 2,777 5.2 95 923.0 923.0 923.0 0.0 S 32,530 230 2,713 5.3 923.0 923.0 923.1 0.1 T 32,880 289 3,773 3.8 923.4 923.4 923.5 0.1 'Feet above confluence with Crow River 2Total width / Width within county FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY pip WRIGHT COUNTY, MN rn AND INCORPORATED AREAS ,•z FLOODWAY DATA SOUTH FORK CROW RIVER 34 Table 6 - Floodway Data (continued) FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE-FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SECTION MEAN WIDTH WITHOUT WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REDUCED REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FROM PRIOR (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET NAVD) (FEET) FEET) SECOND) STUDY (FEET) SOUTH FORK CROW RIVER (CONTINUED) U 33,020 294 3,754 3.8 923.6 923.6 923.6 0.0 V 33,970 336 3,530 4.1 923.8 923.8 923.9 0.1 W 35,608 925 6,282 2.3 924.4 924.4 924.8 0.4 X 37,208 903 10,668 1.3 924.9 924.9 925.3 0.4 Y 38,708 1,051 9,116 1.6 925.1 925.1 925.4 0.3 Z 40,007 1,216 8,958 1.6 925.2 925.2 925.7 0.5 AA 40,608 1,278 10,158 1.4 925.3 925.3 925.8 0.5 AB 45,107 1,725 12,607 1.1 75 926.0 926.0 926.4 0.4 AC 46,807 1,870 16,162 0.9 926.2 926.2 926.6 0.4 AD 48,307 2,160 15,205 0.9 926.4 926.4 926.7 0.3 AE 53,824 1,077 9,443 1.5 928.3 928.3 928.6 0.3 AF 55,825 1720 12,075 1.2 928.6 928.6 928.9 0.3 AG 59,527 770 4,743 3.0 929.1 929.1 929.3 0.2 AH 61,327 677 4,515 3.1 930.2 930.2 930.3 0.1 Al 62,626 344 2,982 4.7 930.7 930.7 930.8 0.1 'Feet above confluence with Crow River FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY pD0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MN r AND INCORPORATED AREAS m m FLOODWAY DATA SOUTH FORK CROW RIVER 35 The area between the floodway and 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries is termed the floodway fringe. The floodway fringe encompasses the portion of the floodplain that could be completely obstructed without increasing the WSELs of the 1-percent-annual-chance flood more than 1 foot at any point. Typical relationships between the floodway and the floodway fringe and their significance to floodplain development are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 — Floodway Schematic LIMIT OF FLOODPLAIN FOR UNENCROACHED 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD%I �FLOODWAY� FLOODWAY �FLOODWAY� FRINGE FRINGE STREAM ~CHANNEL FLOOD ELEVATION WHEN GROUND SURFACE CONFINED WITHIN FLOODWAY ENCROACHMENT ENCROACHMENT C D FILL FILL SURCHARGE*t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A B I AREA OF ALLOWABLE FILL ENCROACHMENT; RAISING FLOOD ELEVATION GROUND SURFACE WILL BEFORE ENCROACHMENT NOT CAUSE A SURCHARGE ON FLOODPLAIN THAT EXCEEDS THE INDICATED STANDARDS LINE A - B IS THE FLOOD ELEVATION BEFORE ENCROACHMENT LINE C - D IS THE FLOOD ELEVATION AFTER ENCROACHMENT *SURCHARGE NOT TO EXCEED 1.0 FOOT (FEMA REQUIREMENT) OR LESSER HEIGHT IF SPECIFIED BY STATE OR COMMUNITY. 5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATIONS For flood insurance rating purposes, flood insurance zone designations are assigned to a community based on the results of the engineering analyses. These zones are as follows: Zone A Zone A is the flood insurance risk zone that corresponds to the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplains that are determined in the FIS by approximate methods. Because detailed hydraulic analyses are not performed for such areas, no BFEs or base flood depths are shown within this zone. 36 Zone AE Zone AE is the flood insurance risk zone that corresponds to the I -percent-annual-chance floodplains that are determined in the FIS by detailed methods. In most instances, whole - foot BFEs derived from the detailed hydraulic analyses are shown at selected intervals within this zone. Zone X Zone X is the flood insurance risk zone that corresponds to areas outside the 0.2-percent- annual-chance floodplain, areas within the 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain, areas of I -percent-annual-chance flooding where average depths are less than 1 foot, areas of 1- percent-annual-chance flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than I square mile, and areas protected from the 1-percent-annual-chance flood by levees. No BFEs or base flood depths are shown within this zone. 6.0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP The FIRM is designed for flood insurance and floodplain management applications. For flood insurance applications, the map designates flood insurance risk zones as described in Section 5.0 and, in the I -percent-annual-chance floodplains that were studied by detailed methods, shows selected whole -foot BFEs or average depths. Insurance agents use the zones and BFEs in conjunction with information on structures and their contents to assign premium rates for flood insurance policies. For floodplain management applications, the map shows by tints, screens, and symbols, the I- and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplains, floodways, and the locations of selected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses and floodway computations. The countywide FIRM presents flooding information for the entire geographic area of Wright County. Previously, FIRMs were prepared for each incorporated community and the unincorporated areas of the County identified as flood -prone. This countywide FIRM also includes flood -hazard information that was presented separately on Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps, where applicable. Historical data relating to the maps prepared for each community are presented in Table 7. 7.0 OTHER STUDIES Information pertaining to revised and unrevised flood hazards from each jurisdiction wihin Wright County has been compiled into this countywide FIS. Therefore, this FIS supercedes all previously printed FIS texts, FHBMs, and FIRMS for all jurisdictions within Wright County. 37 COMMUNITY NAME INITIAL IDENTIFICATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISION DATE FIRM EFFECTIVE DATE FIRM REVISION DATE *,**Albertville, City of N/A None N/A None *,**Annandale, City of N/A None N/A None Buffalo, City of May 8, 1974 May 28, 1976 May 15, 1985 None Clearwater, City of August 23, 1974 May 28, 1976 November 1, 1979 None Cokato, City of May 24, 1974 November 14, 1975 August 19, 1985 None Corinna, Township of May 1, 1978 None May 1, 1978 August 4, 1988 August 18, 1992 Delano, City of May 24, 1974 May 14, 1976 April 1, 1980 December 2, 1988 *,**Howard Lake, City of N/A None N/A None **Maple Lake, City of January 10, 1975 None N/A None Monticello, City of May 24, 1974 March 26, 1976 November 1, 1979 None **Montrose, City of N/A None N/A None Otsego, City of May 1, 1978 None May 1, 1978 August 4, 1988 September 30, 1992 *,**South Haven, City of N/A None N/A None St. Michael, City of May 17, 1974 August 20, 1976 November 1, 1979 July 2, 1982 **Waverly, City of January 17, 1975 None N/A None Wright County May 1, 1978 None May 1, 1978 August 4, 1988 Unincorporated Areas August 18, 1992 *No special flood hazard areas identified **This community did not have a FIRM prior to the first countywide FIRM for Wright County FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY WRIGHT COUNTY, MN r COMMUNITY MAP HISTORY AND INCORPORATED AREAS rn 8.0 LOCATION OF DATA Information concerning the pertinent data used in the preparation of this study can be obtained by contacting FEMA, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Division, 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60605. 9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Study, City of Buffalo, Wright County, Minnesota, May 15, 1985. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Study, City of Delano, Wright County, Minnesota, December 2, 1988a. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Study, Wright CountX (Unincorporated Areas), Minnesota, August 1988b. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Study, City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota, December 2, 1992a. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Study, Wright County (Unincorporated Areas), Minnesota, December 2, 1992b. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Study, Stearns County (Unincorporated Areas), Minnesota, November 16, 1994. Federal Insurance Administration, Flood Insurance Study, City of Dayton, Hennepin County, Minnesota, February 1, 1978. Federal Insurance Administration, Flood Insurance Study, City of Clearwater, Wright County, Minnesota, November 1, 1979a. Federal Insurance Administration, Flood Insurance Study, City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, November 1, 1979b. Federal Insurance Administration, Flood Insurance Study, City of St. Michael, Wright County, Minnesota, Flood Insurance Study report, May 1979c. Federal Insurance Administration, Flood Insurance Study, City of Delano, Wright County, Minnesota, April 1, 1980. Hydrologic Engineering Center, HEC-1 Flood HXdrograph Package, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California, 1970. 39 Hydrologic Engineering Center, HEC-2 Water Surface Profiles, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California, May 1977. Hydrologic Engineering Center, HEC-2 Water Surface Profiles, Computer Program 723- X6-L202A, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California, April 1982. Hydrologic Engineering Center, HEC-RAS River Analysis. sue, Version 4.1.0, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California, January 2010. Lorenz, David L., Chris A. Sanocki and Matthew J. Kocian, Techniques for Estimating the Magnitude and frequency of the Peak Flow on Small Streams in Minnesota Based on Data through Water Year 2005, U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5250, U.S. Department of the Interior, 2009. Mark Hurd Aerial Surveys, Inc., Aerial Photographs, Scale 1:12,000, City of St. Michael, Minnesota, May 1975. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, LIDAR Data, Wright County, 2008. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Flood Plain Management Newsletter, Volume 2, Issue 3, Division of Waters, August 1984. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Ordinary High Water Level Determination for Lake Pulaski, Division of Water, 1981. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Technical Procedures of Floodway Analysis, Division of Water, October 1976. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Technical Report No. 6, The Regulatory Floodway in Floodplain Mana eg ment, Division of Water, September 1977. National Geodetic Survey, VERTCON-North American Vertical Datum Conversion Utility. Retrieved March 18, 2009, from http://www.n sg noaa.gov. National Weather Service, Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, 30-Minute to 24-Hour Durations, 1- to 100-Year Return Periods, Technical Paper No. 40, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1961. National Weather Service, Two to Ten-day Precipitation for Return Periods of 2 to 100 years in the Contiguous United States, Technical Paper No. 49, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1964. National Weather Service, Five to Sixty Minute Precipitation Frequency for Eastern and Central United States, Technical Memorandum NWS Hydro-35, U.S. Department of Commerce, June 1977. M Soil Conservation Service, Computer Program for Project Formulation, Hydrology, Technical Release No. 20, U.S. Department of the Agriculture, 1965. Soil Conservation Service, National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, U.S. Department of Agriculture, August 1972. Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey, Wright County Minnesota, U.S. Department of Agriculture, June 1968. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, Flood Control Appraisal Report, Lake Pulaski, City of Buffalo and Wright County, Minnesota, Memorandum Report, 1984. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, Interim Hydrology Report for Stearns County Flood Insurance Study, July 1985. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, Interim Hydrology Report for Stearns County Flood Insurance Study, May 1986. U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Public Roads, Hydraulic Charts for the Selection of Highway Culverts, December 1965. U.S. Geological Survey, Hydrologic Data and Analysis for the Clearwater River Flood of June 23, 1983 in Stearns, Meeker, and Wright Counties, Water Resources Investigation Report 85, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1985. U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in Minnesota, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1977. U.S. Geological Survey, 15 Minute Series Topographic Maps for Minnesota, Scale 1:62,500, Contour Interval 20 feet: Rockford, Minnesota, 1958. Water Resources Council, Hydrology Committee, Guidelines for DeterminingFlood lood Flow Frequency, Bulletin #1713, Revised September 1981, Editorial corrections March 1982. The Weather Channel, Monthly Averages for Clearwater, MN. Retrieved December 1, 2010, from http://www.weather.com. 41 CHANCE B � CKWATER EFFECTS FROM MI 'SISSIPPI RIVE rn E FL D ELE ATI N T BE LY — — 1 ANNUAL HA WN EPARAT Z w— w = cn z� z 1 LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD --------� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION B H I C I U I E I F I G I H I I I I I J I I K I I L I M I N I Lo Ii 980 980 J W LL W � Q 970 970 C 0 0 Q J W IL J U 0 > z_ 960 960 w w z z O 950 950 w J W U 940 940 z w C� Q F- Z w w w Q 930 930 Q Z z w 0 } O � U � z O 920 � = zLu W > Q J W' W 0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 Lu STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 01 P 1% ANNUAL 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD w w J_ i LL � W ANNUAL C �ANCE FLOOD F ROFILE IS TOO CLOSE TO THE Q 1000 1000 0 � 0 0 Q J Lu J U 0 > 990 990 w w LL z_ z O 980 980 w J W U 970 970 Z W 0 Q � Z W Q Lu Lu >— < q Q Q Z Lu W Z 0 } O1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD W U Z O W = U ZLu W > Q J 0-1W 0 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000 Lu ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 02P co — 00 WX WEIGAND L CLE RWATER LAKE U Lu W J_ i ILL W � Q 1010 1010 0 0 Q J Lu J ILL U 0 1000 1000 W W LL z z O 990 990 W W- ----------- J U 980 980 z W C� Q F-- Z w Q :E W W > C� W � Q Z o z 0 } O1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 0_ U w z O W = U 0 zLu W > Q J W 0 50,000 52,000 54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 62,000 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 72,000 74,000 76,000 Lu ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 03P 0-1 AZ Lu Lu co 1111 (I) 1020 1020 J W LL W � Q 1010 1010 C 0 Lu -i 0 Q J ILL U 0 z_ 1000 1000 w w LL z z O > 990 990 w J W w U 980 980 Z 0 Q H W Q w Lu Q Z Lu Z 0 w } O � U Z O w = U Z W > Q J W' W 0 76,000 78,000 80,000 82,000 84,000 86,000 88,000 90,000 92,000 94,000 96,000 98,000 100,000 102,000 Lu ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 04P -MILL J W Z H 0100 �l II � I co I� � I� i i BL BM BN BO NOTE: THE 2° 1 % ANNUAL ANNUAL CHAN CHANCE FLOG E FLOOD PRO ELEVATION T ILE IS TOO CLOSE BE SHOWN SEPARATELY TO THE LEGEND 0.2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - 2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD --------� 10%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION BC BD BE BF BG BH BI BJ BK LAKE IMARI LAKE LOIJISE- U LJJ LLI J_ LL W Q 1040 1040 C 0 0 Q J J LL U 0 > z 1030 1030 W W LL z z O 1020 1020 w J W U 1010 1010 z W C� Q Z W Q W Q 1000 1000 Q Z o z W 0 � } O 0_ U 0� z O W 990 f zLu W > Q J W' W 0 102,000 104,000 106,000 108,000 110,000 112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 122,000 124,000 126,000 128,000 Lu STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 05P LLI co (I) 1050 1050 W J i 75 ILL W � Q 1040 1040 0 Q 0 J W J ILL U 0 z_ 1030 1030 w w LL z z O 1020 1020 w J W 1010 1010 U z w C� Q w w Lu Q Q o z Z � > D_ O U � z O � = U Z W W Q > J 0-1W 128,000 130,000 132,000 134,000 136,000 138,000 STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 0 w ILL 06P J Z H w U w 0 LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — — 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD --------� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION BP BD BR BS BT BU BV ::I 870 0 z 860 w w LL z O > 850 w J W a1 830 T 880 LLB J_ Q� ILL LU O i n- 0� 0- 870 0 0 O v J ILL m m 0 U 840 z W U' Q Z W Q :E W W Q 830 Q o z Z w OU } U � z O w = U c z : z W Q J Q ry W 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 LU STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 07P C/ Iww Lu 890 890 Lu 0z__OJ Uz}UO_JI ) 880 880 LUJLL Fn =(>� W 870 8700 ILL 860 860 wwwzz850 850 w Zw 840 840w w Q 0 w QZ w >_v Qw w >- Q 830 830 �QQ Z wLEGEND z 0 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD O 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD z O 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODw — — — Lu — — — — 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD Q STREAM BED W Q J 0-1W0 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000 52,000 Lu STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 08P0UZ _ J Lij Lu Lu w -i L.L W O 900 900 0 0 O v J ILL 0 z_ 890 890 w w z_ z O 880 880 w W J U 870 870 z W C� Q � Z W QL W Q 860 860 Q Z o z 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD W 0 } O 0_ U z O W 850 � z W > Q J W 0 52,000 54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 62,000 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 72,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 Lu ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 09P 0-1 Z Z Z Z Z Ll U) 920 920 LU LL LL J_ LL ILL Lu O / 910 910 0 0 O v J ILL 0 z_ 900 900 LuLuLL z_ z O 890 890 Lu J Lu U 880 880 Z Lu C� Q � Z w Q � Lu LuQ < q Q Z Lu LuZ 0 } O1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 0_ U a- Z O Lu= U Z Lu 0 Lu STREAM BED > Q J Lu 0 92,000 94,000 96,000 98,000 100,000 102,000 104,000 106,000 108,000 110,000 112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 Lu ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 10P 0-1 w le J_ LL ILLW O LL 0 O U_ J ILL 0 z_ 920 920 w w LL z _ z O 910 910 w J W U z 900 890 900 890 W C� Q Z w Q � W W >- Q Q � Z o z W 0 } O 0_ U a- z O W = U � Z W Q J > 0-1W 126,000 128,000 130,000 132,000 STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 0 W ILL 11 P Z Z Z U U U J LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD �������� 10%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION } Z W J LEGEND - - 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 10%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION A I B C I IU I I H I I F I I C� I I H I rn LL w w J_ LL ILL 870 870 U) O U) O U) J � ILL 0 > z_ 860 860 w w w z_ z O 1= 850 850 w J W U 840 840 z w C� Q � Z W Q L < W Q 830 830 Q Lu Z z 0.2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD w 0 } 0 � U z O w = U zLu W Q J W' W 2000 4000 6000 8000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 Lu ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE ANOKA / SHERBURNE COUNTY BOUNDARY 12P G7 880 880 J LLl ILL. 870 U) 870 0 U) 0 U) J ILL. 0 > z 860 — 860 oo w w z_ z O 850 850 w J W U 840 840 z w C� Q - � Z X Y Z �j LLI w L < W 830 830 Q LEGEND Q zQ 0.2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD O - - 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD O U U 0- z O - 2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD W = U ---------- 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD Q� z W STREAM BED W Q N O P O R S T U V W � L CROSS SECTION LOCATION J < W 0 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000 52,000 Lu STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE ANOKA / SHERBURNE COUNTY BOUNDARY 13P 0 z 890 w w LL z O > 880 w J W 870 860 07 W LLl W J � LL Fy O O a 900 () O U) LL ..( U 870 Z w C� a Z w Q g w w 860 (D Q Z w O v U � Z o w = U � � Z Lu cl Z W a J a > W 52,000 54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 62,000 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 72,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 Lu STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE ANOKA / SHERBURNE COUNTY BOUNDARY 14P LEGEND LLI Lo 04 cy wl W W J_ i ILL 920 920 U) 0 U) 0 U) J � ILL 0 z 910 910 w w LL z z O 900 900 w J W U 890 890 z Lu C� Q Z Lu Q :E Lu w > Q 880 880 Q � Z z Lu 0 } 01%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 0_ U 0� z O w = U z Lu Lu Q J Lu 78,000 80,000 82,000 84,000 86,000 88,000 90,000 92,000 94,000 96,000 98,000 100,000 102,000 104,000 Lu ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE ANOKA / SHERBURNE COUNTY BOUNDARY 15P 940 930 0 z 920 I— w w u- w 910 w J W •11 we — — — — — — — — — — — i --- AO LEGEND 0.2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — — 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — — — — — — — — — — 10%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION 104,000 106,000 108,000 110,000 112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE ANOKA/SHERBURNE COUNTY BOUNDARY U) cy 940 J LLJ ILL 930 U) O v) O U) ILL� 920 910 U 900 z W C� Q Z W Q L W < Q 890 Q Lu Z z W } 0 U � z O W (D = U � Z Lu W Q J W' W 122,000 124,000 126,000 128,000 130,000 Lu 16P 950 940 0 z 930 I— w w LL w 920 w J W 910 e BA BB BC BD LEGEND 0.2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — — 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — — — — — — — — — — 10%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION AP AO AR AS AT AU AV AW AX AY AZ 130,000 132,000 134,000 136,000 138,000 140,000 142,000 144,000 146,000 STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE ANOKA/SHERBURNE COUNTY BOUNDARY 07 cy 950 J LLJ ILL 940 U) O v) O U) ILL� 930 920 U 910 z W 0 Q Z W Q L W < Q 900 Q Lu Z Z W } O 0_ U � z O W (D = U � Z L W Q J W' W 148,000 150,000 152,000 154,000 156,000 Lu 17P 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 07 cy W LLJ J_ i ILL 950 950 U) 0 U) 0 U) J � ILL 0 z_ 940 940 ------------- w LL z_ z O 1= 930 930 w J W U 920 920 z Lu C� Q � Z Lu Q :E Lu Lu Q 910 910 Q Lu Z z Lu 0 } 0 � U z O w = U 0 z Lu W Q J Lu 0 156,000 158,000 160,000 162,000 164,000 166,000 168,000 170,000 172,000 174,000 176,000 Lu ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE ANOKA / SHERBURNE COUNTY BOUNDARY 18P •.1 0 z 950 w w LL z 0 > 940 w J W 930 920 915 176,000 178,000 180,000 182,000 184,000 STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE ANOKA / SHERBURNE COUNTY BOUNDARY LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - 2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - - - - - - - - - - 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION •.1 950 940 U) W L LI W LL Fy J � O O� a n d Q U� ( O U) J 75 LL U 930 Z W C� a Z w Q g W w Q 920 Q Z w p v U � Z O W (.9 = U � z Lz W a J > W W LL 19P ROW RIVER J (n Z - ------- ------- -------- ------- LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — — 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD --------� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION C � � CF G ANNUAL CHANCE �/� \co Fj v) / 930 930 Lu J_ LL 0 U � Y 920 920 O O0 0 = ILL o O > z z_ 910 910 I- w w LL z_ z O 900 900 w J W U 890 890 z W 0 Q Z w w q Q Z o z W 0 } O 0_ U � z O W = U Z W > Q J W' W 0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 W li STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER 20P o BACKWATER-] - ------- ------- ------ ------ ------- --- ... ... ......... ......... .. .. ....... ......... LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD --------� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION J I K I L I M W U) Lu J_ LL O 0 U � Y 920 920 O O0 0 = ILL o O > z z_ 910 910 I- w w LL z _ z O 900 900 w J W U 890 890 z W C� Q � Z w w Lu Q L < Q Z o z W 0 } O � U z O W = U z W > Lu J 0-1W 0 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 W ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER 21 P N Lo In LL]LL]U > Lu J_ LL O 0 U � Y 930 930 O O0 0 = LL o O > z z_ 920 920 w w LLz_ Z O H 910 910 w J W U 900 900 z w C� Q Z w Q � w w >- Q 890 890 Q � o Z z w 0 } O W U � z O w = U ZLu W > Q J W 0 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000 52,000 54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 62,000 64,000 66,000 w LL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER 22P 0-1 W (I) Lu J_ LL O 0 U � Y 930 930 O OL 0 = LL O o > z z_ 920 920 w w w z_ z O 910 910 w J W U z 900 900 w C� Q Z w Q :E w w < C3 Q Q Z o w z 0 } O 0_ U 0� z O w = U z W > Lu J 0-1W 66,000 68,000 70,000 72,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000 82,000 84,000 86,000 88,000 STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER 0 LL] LL 23P LEGEND 0.2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - 1 %ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - 2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD --------� 10%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED � LOCATION CROSS SECTION T �V \/ LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD --------� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION %< W U) i Lu J_ LL 0 U � Y 940 940 O OL 0 = LL o O > z z 930 930 W W LL z_ z O 920 920 W J W U 910 910 z W 0 Q Z Lu Q :E W W >- < (3 Q Q Z o z W 0 } O 0_ U 0� z O W = U zLu W > Q J 0-1W 0 88,000 90,000 92,000 94,000 96,000 98,000 100,000 102,000 104,000 106,000 108,000 110,000 W ILL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER 24P LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD ���������� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED LL] U) i Lu J_ LL O 0 U � Y 940 940 O OL 0 = LL o O Q z z 930 930 w w LL z_ z O 920 920 w J W U Z W U' Q Z W Q :E W W < C3 Q Q Z Lu w Z 0 } O 0_ U 0� z O w = U Z W > Lu Q_-1 W 0 110,000 112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 122,000 124,000 126,000 128,000 130,000 132,000 w ILL DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER 25P Q W (I) W J_ LL U W Y 950 950 O OL 0 = LL O o Q z 940 940 z w w LL z z O F- 930 930 w J W U z 920 920 W 0 Q � Z w Q � W < W < C� Q Z o z W 0 } O 0_ U 0� z O W = U zLu W Q J > 0-1W 132,000 134,000 136,000 138,000 STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER 0 W ILL 26P J ....... ......... ......... LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD ���������� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION AE — w J W Z J W � - H W � zQ mQ w � Q— J i I i i i LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD ���������� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION co LLI LL G7 LU 925 925 J Y W 0 Lu � U 920 920 O 0 O J LL 0 > z_ 915 915 zoe — w w LL z_ z O 910 910 w J W U 905 905 z w 0 Q � Z w Q � W w Q 900 900 Q Z z W 0 � } O W U � z O w 895 (D zLu �B OL :E W > Q J W' W 890 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 w li STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH MISSISSIPPI RIVER 27P 1%ANNUAL CHAN E BACKWATER EFFECTS FRO MISSISSIPPI � RIVER 930 920 0 z 910 I- w w LL I II 900 Lu J W :•1 ::1 1% NNUAL CHANCE BACKWATER EFFECTS FROM CROW RIVER UI =� w Idi — > J O cn GI L 0 �I 3:I W w Z Y =LE 5; o z A LU U J LL Z '00 ♦ 0 0 AND 0.2% ANNUAL CNANGE FLOOD PROFILES ARE CLOSE 0 ♦ �♦�♦ I J K ----�� LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - - - - - - - - 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION � LOCATION A I t3 I I( I I U I E I F I 8 \/ 8 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER U) W 930 LU W J Q� ILL. U O Lu � Y Q 920 -1 O 0 0 T— ILL U) v11 U 890 z W C� Q Z W Q W Q 880 Q Lu Z z Lu } O 0_ U � z O u1 (D = U � Z Lu W Q J > W' W 0 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 w 28P w z w z J LL 1 - - LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — — 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD — 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD --------� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION ly- W W � No J_ LL LL 0 10I U W Y 930 930 o � O � 0 _ LL ~ Q O z 920 920 w w LL ------------- Z_ Z O 910 910 Lu J LLI U 900 900 w C� Q Z U w 890 W Q 890 Q Z z w 0 � } O 0_ U 0_ z O W = U Z W > LU J W' W 0 2060 4060 6000 8060 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 LU IL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER 29P w z w m z J z LEGEND 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - - 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - 2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD --------� 10% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD STREAM BED CROSS SECTION LOCATION OP R rT W Iff W J_ L.L O C) W Y o 930 930 LL O O ILL ILL Q O z_ 920 920 w w w z_ z O 910 910 w J W U 900 900 z w C� Q Z w w LU < w Q 890 890 (D Z Lu z w 0 } O 0_ U 0_ z O w = U zLU ON W L>>� z J W' W 22,600 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 LU IL STREAM DISTANCE IN FEET ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH CROW RIVER 30P LILI W W J_ ILL O U W � 940 940 O 0 W 0 _ ILL~ o O Q 930 930 z w w W z z 92U 920 w J W 910 910 U 900 900 z w C� Q CZ W G W < Q L Q Z Lu 0.2%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD New FIRM Data with Changes - GIS Map Layer lip R \ • C_ntY Road 14_MN +L .r _ • _ • fill City Boundary Proposed Decrease in Floodplain Extents No Change in Floodplain Extents Proposed Increase in Floodplain Extents CITY OF Monticello tA 1 r• 1 in = 4,635 Ft N A March 25, 2024 Map Powered By Datafi ws b A #3 G L E F Vi M J F�l F- FED L-' \ J KEY TO MAP '00-YVd! f lu nl f3riuniia1\ �A )tl-Year Boundary I LOOIA!' \1 I RINt,L r ("LOOU1ti':\Y Uj — — 1` ` \ UU-Ye.0 I loud Boundar . r,u f I r0cl B0Untial\ _ _u T _ i t _•AJ Srction Link. t q --- A —� ul C C f:lccation Reference tl1arl RM7X r �. Riverly1ilc • M1 5 1 �t NO] LS TO USER Boundaries Of the floodwii S were computed at Cross sections and interpolated between cross sections. The tloodway's were based on hydraulic eonsiAlCralionS without regard to economic, legal, or political factors. 1`hiS map was prepared to support minimum flood plain manage - Anent regulations; it may not show all areas xrhje-t to llooding in the COmmUnity m all planinietric_'I'Vature,S cautstde special <� flood hazard areas. 1 THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR USE IN DEFINING FLOODWAY AND FLOOD BOUNDARIES. ZONE AND BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (BFE) DATA MAY NOT BE CORRECT AS SHOWN. REFER TO THE SEPARATELY PRINTED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR CORRECT ZONE AND BFE DATA. REFER TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR DESCRIPTION OF ELEVATION REFERENCE MARKS. THIS MAP DOES NOT SHOW ALL FLOOD BOUNDARIES. REFER TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR ADDITIONAL FLOOD BOUNDARIES. SCALE 'IN FEE" i VN TIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOODWAY FLOOD BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP CITY OF I MONTICELL IMINNESOTA WRIGHT COUNTY PANEL 1 COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 270541 0001 0 EFFECTIVE DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 1979 a 3n3O NV0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATIC Q KLY 10 NIAP � �UI)1'rdr f luutl fiottnJeae i U(t-Y rat I loud Boundal - s `� 11001 1V•-AY I RIN(dI I LuOItSi-A1 J� v 100-)ear I loml B"ond.ar� � it)U-1 cat I lm-d Buundal LO t t.ruaaSrcuunLinc <A�-- / f lctation Reterencc !Wirh RM7X r y J River Mile • M1.5 NUTkS 10 USER f3ourtdaries of thr floodwacs weri• rctmpuled at gross section-, and interpolated between cross actions. Tht f7eiodwa}s were r / based on hydraulic considerations without regard to CCO,oOniic, _ legal, or political (actors. � This neap was prepared to support ntinintUnI flood plain manage- _n ntent regulations; it nma not show all areas stabjeci to flooding O in the COMMUnity or all planirnelnc featarres Outsidc speci,il Ilood ha[aad areas. 10 ` ✓ C. r \ THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR USE IN DEFINING FLOODWAY AND FLOOD BOUNDARIES. ZONE AND BASE FLOOD MAYj BE f -C 1j CO RECTO AStBSHOWN. DATA REFER TOT THE SEPARATELY PRINTED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR CORRECT ZONE AND ' BFE DATA. / " j f \ �' ' REFER TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR DESCRIPTION OF ELEVATION REFERENCE MARKS. THIS MAP DOES NOT SHOW ALL FLOOD BOUNDARIES. REFER TO THE FLOOD � INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR ADDITIONAL FLOOD BOUNDARIES. O LO m Or D 0 { %l > /= \ i © W I t J� NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM r � 1 t t � � `� I i - FLOU"DWAY FLOOD BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP .__._,r., L • r; ; ' CITY OF MONTICELLO, 4 ,'' ' MINNESO` A WRIGHT COUNTY .% PANEL 2 t COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 270541 0002 B N EFFECTIVE DATE: cr \` -_.y� / oyPptMENTpFy� NOVEMBER i, 1979 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ,x AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT i FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION e r �1 �f -711•, �......._ _... _.,__... f -n �1. J O I D l;. J 7�1 / - A. tiru'N,x I loco Bound,,, - I Lut)I1\1 \N t I:I\t,l. I..10 tA%AN Hit N r.i+ I of Iif,u)fd.n A A I Ic%ation Rocicnct• N1alk RM7X Rico Mil, • M1 .5 No t 1, 1 t. S I R BOUndaticS of the Ilo`uitta\� �%ele lomputctl a! "o„ 'ci. iwl' and innrrpoaicd hctwccn of icctionl. 7hc llootltia \Nc+c ha,cd on llcdlmjlil on,idvrllioni tiiihoUt rCk,ird to c ont4ini legal, of political I hi, m.tp c a> plcpatctl to .uppoll minimum Ilood plain fill "gc, merit rcguletiun+, if en,{\ not show all "'ell, uthject to Ilotiding,. n the .onuiILirI ni all pLSnimclfk haiurc, uut:idc �peri.fl flood lf.v,utl afca�. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR USE IN DEFINING FLOODWAY AND FLOOD BOUNDARIES. ZONE AND BASE FLOOD - ELEVATION (BFE) DATA MAY NOT BE CORRECT AS SHOWN. REFER TO THE SEPARATELY PRINTED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR CORRECT ZONE AND BFE DATA. \ REFER TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR DESCRIPTION OF ELEVATION REFERENCE MARKS. THIS MAP DOES NOT SHOW ALL FLOOD \ BOUNDARIES. REFER TO THE FLOOD \ INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR ADDITIONAL FLOOD BOUNDARIES. I I<' �1c,— � �t , ( n _ \. o � -n - - 10 �l A W � l I fl r \ Cy ' t ^ t v� \X Z � o NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOODWAY FLOOD BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP CITY OF MONTICELL, MINNESOTA I WRIGHT COUNTY aU COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 270541 0003 B EFFECTIVE DATE: vi ,SME] ��yO- NOVEMBER 1, 1979 * 11III �OP a �3A30 My0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATIO • \NP 1• A&M, lb. Floodway* Flood Fringe* S 500-Year Floodplain* DNR Protected Waters Wild and Scenic Boundary Shoreland Overlay District DNR Watercourse 1 City Boundary L ------- - - - I L 1 MOAA ------ *Floodplain is established and effective per FIRM Panels 271711 27171CO160D, 27171CO165D, 27171CO170D,27171CO190D ;Date: yo N /I z m II II 90th 'St Ne------- -- IF All 9 9 t hdAS#_WHe-1 WWK -�ftlll Lill Flood plain, Shoreland and MWSRR Overlay District Appendix Zoning Map 0- "M pil A lia,&aAmmussim - -t , --will -.V 1k, III. I 7,j 4"A Ir• -M A will, Blip "t J!" �4. XALAI j gm?', A 4­ N NA JMVXy. 77111 Iyy ANl•, *Wr'l 4,1 N I& V 7V /'\ 61, w w,:i&Vg L I . 2- 4VI 06 51 IMP Alf. 4 4,2 ANER 'Ill s R Nm Tr. 91'il -x 4T m - Ns", V?z '44. /777/ Ir LAI V ­�jlil 7W Pirl iii011l V., 'N "Pi4 C/ehe a tat P94 L' - , 'Ile V�. w mmirm E- E b 19 4 4 AU T ThorraS Par w f7! �-Wv%m ill Y, -A X � 1-0 lit CU -66U CKels -R -S2 Pit, 7 "art & in a%e r Al 2mg- 1 13.1 • udI 156 Vj I 3 �' ;°/, - _ I a, � I l � 9riq:v_fe � 1, � \-' , � � r „L.:,��i[ii� o --njN e 7P "enning A�Ne irit�,�tat ,7. 7 A , � I I'Ll•7 O `flyegifn Ct X .91 1114 W, Coll ? L 1.1A arias TV - )6' k•INS - All, .rd e !�Z ; A ml"'X1- pm 1 L 71f!�WM20 IN41I!w oIR AmNm rye—mO iiiiil0i 'A-L�R-ff1 -Ala I Xw `XM ► -V ------------------------------ �88th St Ne OT V� ,4, A *V-k.�4 '��O .i 4 jr N e t I Fai 0 e e Ne C crI U� I'Yt.kV Z' w 0A WNW Q-1 St Ne SNe ------------------- ------- ------------ ------------------------------- --- ------ - — - .,— Val !mm to 1. 77 -TT --� --!- — - J6, k4 - - - - - - - - - -- --------- 00 00 S rr z 9 Ist St Ne ar kmi -4 i Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 2B. Public Hearine - Consideration of a reauest for Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 Square Feet in the R-1, Single -Family Residential District Applicant: Ben Holland Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Community & Economic Development 05/07/2024 Commission action): Coordinator 05/28/2024 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, City Planner ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of Conditional Use Permit for total Accessory Structure space exceeding 1,200 square feet in area. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution PC-2024-13 recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure space exceeding 1,200 square feet on a parcel in an R-1, Single -Family Residential District, based on the findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to adopt Resolution PC-2024-13 recommending denial of the proposed Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure space exceeding 1,200 square feet, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC-2024-13. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Address: 8525 Ebben Circle, Monticello, MN 55362 Legal Description: Lot 3, Block 4, Featherstone 4th Addition PI D: 155-252-004030 Planning Case Number: 2024-14 Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure area exceeding 1,200 square feet in the R-1, Single -Family Residential District. Deadline for Decision: May 19, 2024 (60-day deadline) July 18, 2024 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: Low -Density Residential Zoning Designation: R-1, Single -Family Residential District 1 Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Uses: N/A Single -Family Residential Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: Project Description ANALYSIS Single -Family Residential Single -Family Residential Agricultural (Monticello Township) Vacant Land Zoned Residential Construct a detached garage of 640 square feet on a single-family residential lot with an existing 832 square -foot attached garage (total accessory structure area of 1,472 square feet). The zoning ordinance permits a total of 1,200 square feet of all combined attached and detached accessory structure area, with an additional 300 square feet allowed by Conditional Use Permit. An approved Conditional Use Permit provides for a maximum overall size of 1,500 square feet on residential properties. While the applicant's narrative mentions a request for a variance, after staff's review of the request and materials provided as part of the application submittal, it was found a variance for accessory structure square footage area was not necessary. Zoning. The subject parcel is zoned R-1, Single -Family Residential District, within the subdivision of Featherstone 4t" Addition. Featherstone 4t" Addition was originally approved through a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development in 2019. As a PUD, the design standards for the plat were requested to reflect the R-1 standard in place at the time of the Featherstone preliminary plat approval in 2003. None of these standards address accessory structures differently than what is currently in the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Setbacks. The applicant has indicated that the proposed accessory structure would be setback 20' from the south property line adjacent to 85t" Street NE, compliant with the code. Given the proposed setbacks from the south line, the garage would be setback from the front property line that follows the cul-de-sac curve more than 37'. Though the narrative mentions a 12' wide parking pad on the east side of the garage, the zoning ordinance states the following: "Parking on any side of any detached accessory structure shall be prohibited except in such case that the detached accessory structure is the only garage for the building" (§153.067 Off -Street Parking). Given that the exception does not apply to this property, and there is an existing parking pad adjacent to the attached garage, the proposed Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 pad could be installed, but would not be available for parking. Although this is not a consideration under the CUP request before the Planning Commission, staff wanted to point out that distinction. Given this information, the applicant may wish to adjust the proposed structure's location relative to the east property line. If the CUP is approved, setback dimensions will be verified for code compliance through submission of a certificate of survey. Given the unique layout of this lot with 3 different side property lines (north, east, and south), the proposed location of the structure has been determined to be in the side yard, as it is placed out of the required 30' front setback area from the front property line along the cul-de- sac. Staff finds the proposed location to be a reasonable request based on the circumstances and does not conflict with the intent of the ordinance section that does not allow for accessory structures in the front yard. Driveway. The applicant has indicated in the narrative that the width of the existing driveway will remain 23' at the curb. The survey shows that the driveway narrows to the property line to 18.5'. The R-1 district sets a maximum driveway width of 30' at the property line and 28' at the curb. The proposal does include an expansion of the driveway on the property leading to the proposed structure. The driveway to the detached structure is allowed by ordinance, though it may not be used for parking. City engineering staff will review plans for the expansion of the driveway to ensure zoning ordinance compliance in connection with a building permit. Accessory Structure — Major Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Specific to the proposed garage itself, the zoning ordinance lays out the following criteria related to accessory structures in residential districts, including guidelines for when a conditional use permit is required related to the overall size of the structure. 153.092(D)(2) Accessory building — major. (a) In all residential districts except M-H, the following shall apply: 1. Size. a. Except by conditional use permit issued pursuant to § 153.092(D)(3)(a)1.b. below, no detached accessory building shall exceed 10% of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: (i) 1,200 square feet; or (ii) The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. Staff Comment: The proposed accessory structure is 640 square feet, with an existing garage on site of 832 square feet. The total accessory structure area proposed on site is 1,472 square feet. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint (livable space) includes livable space on the first floor, as well as any portion of livable space that is above the attached garage area. The finished square footage on the main floor of the home is 1,521 square feet. The gross Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 square footage of the principal building footprint remains larger than the sum of the total square footage of accessory structures. b. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in § 153.092(D)(3)(a)1.a. above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a conditional use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: (i) Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. Staff Comment: The applicant noted within the narrative that the structure would only be used for personal uses such as storage. Limiting the use of the space to residential personal property purposes only is included as a condition of approval in Exhibit Z. (ii) The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. Staff Comment: The total size of the lot is .65 acres and given the proposed setbacks of the accessory structure, the lot is of sufficient size and width to accommodate. (iii) The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. Staff Comment: The proposed total accessory structure area is 1,472 square feet. Given that the neighboring property to the east acquired a CUP for a 704- square-foot detached accessory structure, staff does not believe that this will adversely affect the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding properties. (iv) The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. Staff Comment: As noted within the applicant's narrative and front building elevation, the accessory structure is proposed to have the same materials as the principal structure, including the requirement for brick/stone on the front fagade of the accessory structure as the proposed location is visible from the public street. 4 Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 Overall Conditional Use Permit Criteria. (a) Conditional use permit criteria. Approval of a conditional use permit application requires the city find that conditions can be established to ensure that all of the following criteria will always be met: 1. The conditional use will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity of the subject property; Staff Comment: The conditional use is anticipated to increase property value for the applicant's parcel and would not impact those of the neighboring properties. 2. The conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working near the use; Staff Comment: The accessory structure will be constructed according to the building code and not endanger persons or property in the area. 3. The conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property for permitted uses predominant in the area; Staff Comment: No access or development will be impacted by the proposed building. 4. The conditional use will not pose an undue burden on public utilities or roads, and adequate sanitary facilities are provided; Staff Comment: The project is not expected to pose a burden on public utilities and roads. 5. The conditional use can provide adequate parking and loading spaces, and all storage on the site can be done in conformance with city code requirements; Staff Comment: The proposed conditional use will provide adequate parking and loading space relevant to the principal use of the property; parking is subject to the code provisions as noted above. 6. The conditional use will not result in any nuisance including but not limited to odor, noise, or sight pollution; Staff Comment: The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to result in any nuisances. 7. The conditional use will not unnecessarily impact natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, and shorelines; and all erosion will be properly controlled; Staff Comment: The conditional use is not anticipated to unnecessarily impact any natural features on or surrounding the parcel. 8. The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined in Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 §§ 153.090 through 153.093 for the proposed use. Staff Comment: The provisions identified in this CUP requirement are addressed in the section above. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure area exceeding 1,200 square feet in the R-1, Single -Family Residential District. As discussed within this report, the lot provides sufficient space to accommodate the larger detached accessory structure and will not negatively impact the surrounding properties. Additionally, the applicant has indicated in their narrative that the architecture of the garage will match that of the principal building. Given the change in circumstances related to the proposed parking pad, staff will verify compliance with setback requirements at the time of building permit application submittal. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2024-13 B. Aerial Site Images C. Applicant Narrative D. Existing Conditions Survey with Rough Proposed Conditions E. Detached Accessory Structure Floor Plan & Elevations Z. Conditions of Approval C1 Planning Commission Agenda — 05/07/2024 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structures Exceeding 1,200 square feet Address: 8525 Ebben Circle, Monticello, MN 55362 Legal: Lot 3, Block 4, Featherstone 4th Addition PI D: 155-252-004030 The applicant will provide a certificate of survey including the proposed structure and driveway expansion verifying code -compliant setbacks for the building permit. 2. The accessory structure will be used for personal residential storage and parking only; no commercial activity may occur in the building. 3. The exterior materials used to finish the accessory structure must match the existing home in material type and color, including brick/stone on the front facade consistent with the front of the home. 4. Expansion of the driveway width is limited to 30 feet at the property line and 28 feet at the public street. 5. Recommendation of the City Engineer as related to site grading and drainage. 6. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-13 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES EXCEEDING 1,200 SQUARE FEET IN AN R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT 3, BLOCK 4, FEATHERSTONE 4T" ADDITION PID 155-252-004030 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct a detached accessory structure in the side yard portion of the subject property for storage of private residential storage and recreational use; and WHEREAS, the proposed total accessory building space would exceed the standard area of 1,200 square feet; and WHEREAS, accessory building space, when exceeding 1,200 square feet, requires a Conditional Use Permit, and WHEREAS, the site is zoned R-1 Single -Family Residential, which allows such use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Low -Density Residential" for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting the proposed structure and location of the structure on the subject property, along with access via an existing driveway; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 7, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed structure will be in compliance with maximum square footage requirements, which require accessory structures to total no more than 1,500 square feet. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-13 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed structure is architecturally similar to the principal structure in roofline and facade appearance, subject to appropriate conditions of approval. 3. The parcel is a lot that will accommodate the detached garage without crowding the subject property or neighboring parcels. 4. The building will be constructed so as to be consistent with the use and building massing of other single-family structures common in the community and in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for accessory structure area exceeding 1,200 square feet, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: The applicant will provide a certificate of survey including the proposed structure and driveway expansion verifying code compliant setbacks for the building permit. The accessory structure will be used for personal residential storage and parking only; no commercial activity may occur in the building. 3. The exterior materials used to finish the accessory structure must match the existing home in material type and color, including brick/stone on the front fagade consistent with the front of the home. 4. Expansion of the driveway width is limited to 30 feet at the property line and 28 feet at the public street. 5. Recommendation of the City Engineer as related to site grading and drainage. 6. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTEDthis 7th day of May, 2024 bythe Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION as ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Ira Consideration of Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure Legal: Lot 3, Block 4, Featherstone 4th Addition; PID: 155-252-004030; 8525 Ebben Circle Created by: City of Monticello Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure Legal: Lot 3, Block 4, Featherstone 4th Addition; PID: 155-252-004030; 8525 Ebben Circle Created by: City of Monticello The property is located at Lot 3, BloCk 4, Featherstone Fourth Acid then at 8525 Ebben Cif, Monticello. Proposal 1: I am respectfully requesting a variance on the amount of allowable garage space within the City Limits of Monticello. I am aware that the maximum allowable garage space is 1200 square feet. I am requesting an increase to 1500 square feet. Currently, I have a garage space that is 832 square feet. Proposal It approved to the 1500 square feet of garage space, I am requesting to build a 20x32 detached garage on the Eastside of my property aligned with our neighbors detached garage with a parking pad of 12 feetwide on the east side of the garage. The detached garage slope and elevation wilt match exactly what my neighbor has with his detached garage. Thisgarage will match my house with the same siding, garage door, and stone. The driveway for the detached garage will bathe Length of the garage plus the parking pact on the east sidetor a total of 36 feet. It wilt tie into my existing driveway straight out. I will be connecting into my existing driveway at the one corner bythe curb. I will not be adding to the total width of the existing driveway at the curb. The width of the existing driveway at the curb wilt remain 23 feet. This partof the driveway wilt only be used as a means to access the detached garage. This detached garage wilt only be used for personal use, storage of a classic car, ATV and snowmobile. With placementot the structure in the purposed position I am able to meet the requirement of 20 feet off of any roadway and the 6 foot requirement off of the neighbor's yard —we will be 12 feet off our neighbors yard. Attached is a drawingofthe placement of my residence along with the detached garage Any questions you can reach me at — Sincerely, 4X Benjamin Holland As -Built Survey for Novak Builders / Lot 3, Block 4, FEATHERSTONE FOURTH ADDITION EOF on lot / s 962.8 City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota r r %965 4 i 965 4 c_ % I - r - � -�- i i - r � i � -i- � � � � r- ALL BEARING AND DISTANCE INFORMATION IS PER THE RECORDED PLAT. ! l I r l l- - P/D. 155-252-004020 i . i i r L__ 9s36 EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN PER RECORDED PLAT UNLESS OTHER DOCUMENTATION WAS PROVIDED TO US. `O °.t 42299 g63.3 °°�� S 89°06'39- W dP 171.95 '1 99 E,bben 964./ �'!F 5) ,p 8L5 je( 63g'' \ ,c IP Y2 0 \ % 9627 90.4 935 96 .'�.' 6" dry. a+ 42299! \ M9629---965.0 `2 ------------I-nL �- C 9�' 66. / Ft 965.7 964.3� 12 o F 96% see see '%%•�i/�iQ 12 I 0% 96S 65 5 965.4 % - V 6 966• 964.5 i� ,`'• )e(962' I64 g65 +gam 985 0 M 34.33 ��° g3 �^ecandory BM.• 962 T /� House =� 9` A� f@�3.3 �l/r "yG� TNH E7ev. =965.76 (� I 63.6 I 468525 � p Di 964.J q11; � %9 48 9654 965.45.6 g2 'Y �96A6 \� lfj� �O.(�a 96 6 % 0 65 9 � I � o n � %9 % 42299 NI r g 6 965.4 o to . ` a € \ 0' g62. r % ?9 )K963.2I 64' N I I I'I 9 I I I � I � P1D.155-252-004030 65.3 9.00 96 965.s Area.0.65% Ac. _ID 1% 964 s h - / / / l h ! r ! `V O '46 Dr7WWay X964.6 965 4 22.67 965.3 I2 I 3X %g63 Garage i V se 0963 9 I I 965. s % ._, ` (Drop / Course) 1 ( co %965'4 I i i1(9663 96' � 26.JJ }9p80. __ X966.j 64`t0 jg(g6 ' g 9 'li %� 41 3 I 64• w % W N I 965.0 � 965.1 o I I )1(965.9 I Z W965.2 wrg66.2 5 3 I O REFERENCE BENCHMARK TNH at the NE quadrant of Ebersole Ave and 87th St NE Elevation = 959.34 feet (Plat Datum) Per Record Drawings FLEV PER GRADING PLAN Plans of Pioneer Engineering P, - Gambier y,963 / Garage Floor Elev = 966.8 Lowest Floor Elev = 959.1 Lowest Opening Elev = 967.3 s/� 65 - *9-' - seL set, S % I h PID: 155-252-004 040 966 0 I 56l - 7 i - � - i %965• 6• A, 1 96r, 1 -1- 1 1, - i i I 96 7 i - "� n % l2 I 9654 r 963.5 44 % 962.1 6 % L - - - - -------- - - - - - - - % 965.8 965? - - - - - - - - - - - - 64 B 963 5 e a 962-` 962. I �( 6 �- - - LA �r�" ' /� 966'1 o D 964.9 g64.3 30. 00 $ 89 "0258" W %962 /p Y2 • % 961.8 o, IP Y2 42299 962.5 a - - - OHE - - - oHE - - - o+E - - - o� 9 - - oHE �- - - WE - - - oHE - - - OW - - - am- 6 - WE - 960 960 42299 '� 2 I SHEET NO. 965 85th St N. E. As -built Survey BOGART, PEDERSON Novak Builders lr7�1 & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYING L3, B4, FEATHERSTONE FOURTH ADD CIVIL ENGINEERING A A MAPPING Wright County, M N TEL757613 5262T 8822 BEFAX:R 763-262- 884422 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Craig A. Wensmann Date: 815/21 Reg. No.47466 X 0 20 SCALE: I" = 20' • Denotes found on monument 960.2 Denotes as -bunt elevation De!?ctes os-hu11' o-ound e!-vct%an x 958.1 Denotes existing ground elevation -- Denotes proposed elevation -f- - Denotes drainage flow ® Denotes electric service i Denotes sanitary manhole ED Denotes telephone pedestal PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVA TIONS ® Denotes water curb stop Top of House Block Elev = 97-c.2 969.J ® Denotes sanitary service Top of Garage Block Elev = 969.5 968.6 ` L Denotes power pole Garage Floor Elev = :969.2 968.2 Denotes hydrant Lowest Floor Elev = 962t;5 96hJ A Denotes electrical cabinet Lowest Opening E/ev = -9E5.5 966.0 12 Denotes cable television box (Top of Rear Block Elev) LS 42299 Denotes Peter J. Hawkinson, LS SETBACKS 30' Front 10' Side 30' Rear 20' Side Street HOUSE TYPE Rambler Lookout NIN R-1 Residential DATE: 8/4/21 REV NO. DESIGN BY: DRAWN BY: RL CHECKED BY: CAW DWG FILE: L3 B4 ASB FILE NO.:16-0212.09 Denotes bituminous surface - - - - - - Denotes easement Denotes existing adfolners seL - Denotes bupoing setback line arm - Denotes overhead electric Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: -1 e e I- - N.T.S. Being 6 feet in width, and adjoining lot lines, and 12 feet in width and adjoining street lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise indicated on the plat. DATE I DESCRIPTION I I EOF on tot l = 962.8 965.4 r- r- A -l- I l r- r N /' -/- / \ n I r- l V L- I �963.3 , 96r•'� lP %2I � �962.8 90.4 42299 962. S X962.9 - - - g6j I 12 3�Eg62, I _JV) I c \1 X965 2 M I g65.4 L _ PID: 155-252- 004020 o h 96 S 89006'39" WIa• l7/. 95 A 964. SBL SBL 965.0 BL �BLr-^ 5 p� g6s g65 5 965.4 X 965.0 34.33 House #8525 As -Built Survey for Novak Builders / Lot 3 Block 4 FEATHERS TONE FOURTH ADDITION Cityof Mont�cel%Wri ht County Minnesota g I I 963 6 /P %2 ° 9 42299 �- E,bbe� 96,81.5096. � 9639 ��66. l X 965.7 964.3 , _ SBL 966 • 964.5 X 0 �� / �� 9 Secondary BM: •g62g62 �96 SS 63.3 /0 , TNH Elev.=965.76 / �aE 964.3 6' 4 g65.4 5. 67 2 `n�� YA 965.6 \ Q� '0 96 . 3aEg6� $ X965 0 �(9684 \ \ O 962 8 962.8 lP %2° / X f 42299 / ,gr 6 965.4 N I •I31�I a / \ ° \ 96 29 I I U / SBA 963 0 96 ` 2g PID: 155-252-0040JO 965.3 9. 00 g6q 0 96�0 965.9 � � Area: 0.65`/- Ac. La T � t�2 g63 r5 - \ l l r N -l- l l ° �� �96 \ 963.3 1 6 X g63 1� �- - lin oo 46 3 Driveway 6� I 1�N 964' �g65.� 67 965.3 ) 11 I ° 8.39 \ \ SBL x963•1 I 9 65.5 966, Garage 1 0 3 I m \ N o N 1965.0 \ N �3�(g65 9 I O LO 2 �g65'21 \ 966.0 I /2 I g66•t� 965.8 Xg65- /P %2' 42299 OHE - - in ro I SHEET NO. OHE - fi65' (Drop l Course) I l0 8 965.6� I -6 0 0 N 3� 963. tg66 3�o - 26.33 9� 8 r06.1g65. 6� �96 63.1 Aig6 U 9963.1 9 I O 9 64.5 N w 965•1 0966.2 SBL � SBL SBL 0 N - OHE SBL g65.1 X x9r eF W �g6�•S \'�' I 965 0 I N 963 6 -7c SBL SBL65 5 SBL SB�63S I M PID: 155-252-004040 n , . n g66; l -l- l .l 0963.7 /- 1 L/ L/ l l l \ l V g63 5 964.4 964.9 grOO 30.00 S 89002'58" W 6�� 9 g62.5 964 4 � 4X � � g63. OHE OHE OHE qk3 OHE - 945#7 St. N.E. As -built Survey Novak Builders L30 B4, FEATHERSTONE FOURTH ADD Wright County, MN X962•11 6 CO 962. / X 661.E X962 IP %2" X 96/8 rn 42299 OHE OHE - g6� � BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 OHE OHE - 011. 00 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Craig A. Wensmann Date: 8/5/21 Reg. No.47466 ALL BEARING AND DISTANCE INFORMATION IS PER THE RECORDED PLAT. EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN PER RECORDED PLAT UNLESS OTHER DOCUMENTATION WAS PROVIDED TO US. AS BUILT GRADING SURVEY Approved A4tnt��"ate_ 8/9/21 REFERENCE BENCHMARK TNH at the NE Quadrant of Ebersole Ave and 87th St NE Elevation = 959.34 feet (Plat Datum) Per Record Drawings Plans of Pioneer Engineering R - Rambler Garage Floor Elev = 966.8 Lowest Floor Elev = 959.1 Lowest Opening Elev = 967.3 X 0 20 SCALE: 1" = 20' LEGEND: • Denotes found iron monument 960.2 Denotes as -built elevation X 959.4 Denotes os-built ground elevation x 958. l Denotes existing ground elevation - Denotes proposed elevation ►- - Denotes drainage flow ®a Denotes electric service 0 Denotes sanitary manhole ❑T Denotes telephone pedestal PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVA TIONS ® Denotes water curb stop Top of House Block Elev = j�,o.f 969.3 ss Denotes sanitary service Top of Garage Block Elev =969.5 968.6 qL Denotes power pole Garage Floor Elev = -969.2968.2 Denotes hydrant Lowest Floor Elev = 962.5 96I.3 E❑ Denotes electrical cabinet Lowest Opening E/ e v = 965.5 966.0 ❑1v Denotes cable television box Top of Rear Block Elev) LS 42299 Denotes Peter J. Hawkinson, LS SETBACKS 30' Fron t l0' Side 30' Rear 20' Side Street HOUSE TYPE Rambler Lookout ZONING R- l Residen tial DATE: 8/4/21 REV NO. DESIGN BY: DRAWN BY: RL CHECKED BY: CAW DWG FILE: L3 B4 ASB FILE NO.:16-0212.09 Denotes bituminous surface - - - - - - Denotes easement Denotes existing adjoiners SBL - Denotes building setback line - - - OHE - Denotes overhead electric Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: I J L6 s II-L -121---1 -121--- N.T.S. Being 6 feet in width, and adjoining lot lines, and 12 feet in width and adjoining street lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise indicated on the plat. DATE I DESCRIPTION _ e 1 a E 5 . E IL-1 L s t C \ O -UrAB 't Center P } Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 2C. Public Hearine - Consideration of an Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations as an Accessory Use in the B-3, Highway Business District. Applicant: Doug Walkup Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Grittman Consulting, Stephen 05/07/2024 Commission action): Grittman, City Planner 05/28/2024 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Chief Building and Zoning Official, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Project Engineer ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing Conditional Use Permit for a Fuel Station by adding Electric Vehicle Charging Station facilities. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC-2024-14 recommending approval of the Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Electric Vehicle Charging facilities as an Accessory Use based on findings in said Resolution and subject to the Conditions of Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to recommend denial of the Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Electric Vehicle Charging facilities as an Accessory Use based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table, subject to additional information from staff or applicant. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Address Legal Description PID #: Planning Case Number: 2024-17 110 Oakwood Drive East, Monticello, MN 55362 Lot 7, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition 155-202-001070 Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for an amended CUP to a Vehicle Fuel Sales facility adding Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. Deadline for Decision: June 8, 2024 (60-day deadline) August 7, 2024 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: Community Commercial 1 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 Zoning Designation: B-3, Highway Business Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District Current Site Uses: Vehicle Fuel Sales/Car Wash and Convenience Retail Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: Commercial -Restaurant Commercial Retail/Service Mixed Commercial Highway 25/Mixed Commercial Project Description: The proposed site is a Vehicle Fuel Sales facility with a Convenience Retail building and an attached self-service car wash to rear (south) of the building. In this same rear area is accessory parking which includes access to and from the car wash, and to an internal private street system. The site is part of an existing CUP for Planned Unit Development which included the development of the Convenience Retail and Vehicle Sales uses. The project consists of converting the curb line of the existing rear parking area to accommodate electric vehicle charging stations and equipment. In the initial phase, only 4 of the existing 13 parking spaces would be utilized to accommodate the charging stations, although the CUP request incorporates all 13 at this time to avoid the need for future re -application. The project would relocate the existing vacuum mechanical equipment that supports the car wash. The remaining spaces would continue to serve as parking, although the applicant indicates plans to add additional charging equipment over time. The installation also includes mechanical equipment including a switchgear and a transformer. The applicant indicates that the proposed EV charging facilities would be available to the general public, and not specific to any particular vehicle brand. ANALYSIS Zoning. The subject site is zoned B-3, Highway Business. Within B-3 districts, Vehicle Fuel Sales facilities are allowed by conditional use permit. The existing commercial facility was reviewed and approved by CUP. The addition of accessory electric vehicle charging stations to the K Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 existing site use requires an amendment to the CUP, which is treated and processed in the same manner as a new Conditional Use Permit. Setbacks. The B-3 District setbacks and other building -related standards are not affected by the project, which proposes only to alter the parking area south of the building. However, the applicable setback from the public right-of-way applies to the proposed mechanical equipment located in the south corner of the site. The proposed transformer location appears to be approximately 14 feet from the Highway 25 right-of-way. The transformer structures are subject to the required 20-foot setback for accessory structures and must be relocated or shifted in some way to meet that standard. In addition, the switchgear and transformer equipment should be screened with landscaping from view of Highway 25. The transformer cabinet appears to be approximately 6 feet, 6 inches in height. No separate landscaping plan is included with the application package. Other Elements. Two other aspects of the site use are impacted by the revisions to the site plan, each discussed separately below. Landscaping. As noted above, a landscaping plan is required to illustrate a vegetative screen for the transformer and switchgear equipment. That plan should consist of a combination of evergreen shrubs that screen the view of the equipment from passing traffic on Highway 25. In addition to this screening, the plan proposes to remove two existing trees that were a component of the original landscape. Those two trees should be replaced on the property to continue compliance with the existing Conditional Use Permit. If those trees are replaced with evergreen trees such as Spruce, they may also serve as a component of the required screening. Parking Supply. The proposed project repurposes the current 13 open parking spaces to serve as charging stations for electric vehicles, in a phased process. The site currently consists of a retail building of approximately 3,700 square feet (not including the car wash). The parking requirement for a building of this size is one space per 200 square feet of (net) floor space (exclusive of coolers, restrooms, storage, etc.), which would result in a parking requirement of 12 to 15 spaces, depending on the floor layout. The parking in front of the building accommodates 14 parking spaces, and there is other "informal" parking space on the site. At the time of the site's original approval for development, the site required a minimum of 14 parking spaces per the zoning ordinance standards in place at that time. The rear parking being converted to EV charging would not be required for compliance with the code for parking supply and as the spaces are not signed for exclusive EV use, they would be available for overflow parking demand. Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 Vacuum Mechanical Equipment. The plan proposes to relocate the existing vacuum equipment used by car wash patrons to another location on the site. However, no proposed location is included as a part of the current proposal. Because only four of the EV charging stations are a part of the initial phase, the current vacuum site is not necessarily affected by the initial phase of work. However, the applicants will need to identify the proposed relocation site as a part of the current project. Because the exit lane for the car wash is short, there does not appear to be room in that area. There is no specific requirement for a vacuum facility, and it may be removed from the plan — in either case, this aspect of the project should be addressed as a part of the current CUP amendment review. As noted above, this CUP request includes all 13 spaces, understanding that they will be phased in over time. Signage. The applicants have not detailed any additional on -site signage for commercial or directional purposes. Any signage will need to meet the City's sign ordinance requirements and be subject to separate permitting. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Approval of a conditional use permit application (including amendments) requires that the City find that conditions can be established to ensure that all the following criteria will always be met: (i) The conditional use will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Staff Comment: Attending to the concerns noted in the report, including landscape screening and compliance with other code standards would avoid the likelihood that property values would be affected by the change. (ii) The conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working near the use. Staff Comment: The charging stations contribute to health and safety, and do not have any likely detrimental impacts. (iii) The conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property for permitted uses predominant in the area. Staff Comment: No access or development will be impacted by the proposed accessory charging stations. (iv) The conditional use will not pose an undue burden on public utilities or roads, and adequate sanitary facilities are provided. Staff Comment: Construction of the charging station is not expected to have an impact on utilities or roads. The applicants will need to separately address electric utility service to the site. 4 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 (v) The conditional use can provide adequate parking and loading spaces, and all storage on the site can be done in conformance with City Code requirements. Staff Comment: The existing site supplies adequate on -site parking without the need for the parking spaces being converted by this project. The charging sites nonetheless provide parking space for EV customers, and others who may need overflow space when necessary. (vi) The conditional use will not result in any nuisance including but not limited to odor, noise, or sight pollution. Staff Comment: As noted above, the visibility of the transformer equipment could raise issues with this element, particularly with regard to visibility, and occasionally with regard to ongoing maintenance and access. The addition of landscape screening will address this concern. (vii) The conditional use will not unnecessarily impact natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, and shorelines, and all erosion will be properly controlled. Staff Comment: No impacts to any natural features are expected with this project. (viii) The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined in the Zoning Ordinance for the proposed use. Staff Comment: With the modification to meet the 20-foot setback from Highway 25, and the other conditions identified in Exhibit Z, the project will be in compliance with relevant zoning requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the CUP amendment with the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. The applicant proposes an alteration to existing parking spaces, adding accessory use electric vehicle charging to an area of surplus parking. To avoid any negative impacts of this improvement, staff has recommended alternatives related to the location of the transformer equipment, and landscaping to screen the equipment and replace other trees being removed. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2024-14 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Plan Set, dated April 2, 2024 Z. Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 EXHIBIT Z CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING FACILITY ADDRESS: 110 OAKWOOD DRIVE EAST, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 LOT 7, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO TRAVEL CENTER 2ND ADDITION PI D: 155-202-001070 The plans are revised to shift the location of the mechanical equipment to meet the required 20-foot setback from Highway 25. 2. The project is constructed per the plans provided, with incorporation of the recommendations made by the Planning Commission and the staff report. This CUP incorporates an approval for all 13 proposed charging sites, phased in over time. 3. Prior to installation of additional charging stations following the first phase of construction, the applicant shall provide a site plan demonstrating parking supply on site meets the demand of both customer and staff parking in addition to the spaces with charging stations. Said site plan will be subject to review by the Community Development Department. 4. The plans are supplemented to add landscape screening consisting of evergreen shrubs and/or trees to screen view of the mechanical equipment from the view of Highway 25 traffic. 5. The applicant provides replacements for the two trees proposed to be removed by the project. 6. Signage and other components related to the project meet all zoning requirements and are subject to permitting as required. 7. Comments and recommendations from the City's Engineering Staff. 8. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. C. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-14 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION IN A B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT ADDRESS: 110 OAKWOOD DRIVE EAST, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 LEGAL: LOT 7, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO TRAVEL CENTER 2ND ADDITION PID 155-202-001070 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to amend an existing Conditional Use Permit for an accessory electric vehicle facility as part of a vehicle fuel sales use; and WHEREAS, the proposed charging facility would alter the existing condition by modifying the curb line of an existing parking area, and adding charging equipment; and WHEREAS, the proposed use would have no other expected impacts on the site; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Highway Business (B-3), which allows such use as an accessory use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the use would continue to be consistent with the long-term land use plan for the City and the location, including the designation of the site for "Community Commercial" uses; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting that the proposed use facilitate long-term use of the site for alternative fuel vehicles; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting that the proposed use will comply with the terms and standards of the zoning ordinance with the recommendations approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 7t", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed facility will be in compliance with the standards for electric vehicle charging facilities found in the zoning ordinance. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-14 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the use will improve long- term use of the site for a transition to electric vehicle use. 3. The parcel is intended for commercial uses, which is the existing and proposed use of the property. 4. The operation of the business will not create noise, odors, visual impacts, or other noticeable impacts on the property or the neighborhood beyond those expected for allowed uses in the zoning district. 5. The use will improve convenience to customers and to the public, consistent with the City's economic development objectives for commercial property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for electric vehicle charging facilities as an accessory use, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: The plans are revised to shift the location of the mechanical equipment to meet the required 20-foot setback from Highway 25. The project is constructed per the plans provided, with incorporation of the recommendations made by the Planning Commission and the staff report. This CUP incorporates an approval for all 13 proposed charging sites, phased in overtime. Prior to installation of additional charging stations following the first phase of construction, the applicant shall provide a site plan demonstrating parking supply on site meets the demand of both customer and staff parking in addition to the spaces with charging stations. Said site plan will be subject to review by the Community Development Department. 4. The plans are supplemented to add landscape screening consisting of evergreen shrubs and/or trees to screen view of the mechanical equipment from the view of Highway 25 traffic. 5. The applicant provides replacements for the two trees proposed to be removed by the project. Signage and other components related to the project meet all zoning requirements, and are subject to permitting as required. 7. Comments and recommendations from the City's Engineering Staff. 8. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 71" day of May, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-14 M ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Consideration of an Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit Legal: Lot 7, Block 1, Travel Center 2nd Addition; PID: 155202001070; 110 Oakwood Dr E Created by: City of Monticello OWLS Proiect Narrative: 110 Oakwood Dr E. Monticello. MN 55362 This is a project to install electric vehicle chargers with a new electrical service in the parking lot of this existing Holiday Gas Station. We are proposing to install (2) Terra ABB 184 electric vehicle chargers and prep for the future installation of (4) additional chargers and a new electrical service including a new transformer and switchboard; relocating existing vacuum cleaners; removing and replacing (1) light pole and installing (1) new light pole; removing and replacing concrete curb and parking re -striping and stencil. These chargers will operate during the same hours as the existing station, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and will be available for public use. This project is in line with the conditional use permit approved on 11/5/2005 (order # 05-051) granting the use of the property for motor fuel station in this B-3 district. This project complies with the standards and requirements set by Ordinance No. 797 and we are requesting approval to amend the existing CUP as required under Section 5 of this ordinance. Thank you, Doug Walkup Sr. Permit Coordinator M: (740) 801-1615 douglas.walkup@owlservices.com 6235 Southern Blvd. Youngstown, OH 44512 OWL4 eMobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES CHARGING EQUIPMENT and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state /�off Minnesota Signature: �u _ ► / , Name: Phillip J Jamiinlet Date: CIRCLE K 2746344 MONTICELLO License Number. 62439 110 OAKWOOD DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 J W N Uwe VICINITY MAP AERIAL MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION ZQ� U-) o 0 z =��... o 2i • INSTALL (1) UTILITY TRANSFORMER i • INSTALL (1) SWITCHBOARD ASSEMBLY 00 • INSTALL (2 ABB TERRA 184 DISPENSERS ) J C I. .= - J • PREP FOR (4) FUTURE ABB TERRA 184 DISPENSERS W a } - NEW PARKING LOT STRIPING U NEW CONCRETE CURBING O DRAWING INDEX z _ Lu J U SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE REV NO. r;li3 rr �y ��I' CS COVER SHEET & PROJECT INFORMATION 1 C-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 '' Cal �• U ►� ;r1r11'lia' 3►`I _ •-�• -' C-2 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN 1 _ C-3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1 Z, D-1 DETAILS 1 AL D-2 DETAILS 1 i� Iv! -I -1= .-� E-1 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 1 1 E-2 ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM 1 _. E-3 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT DETAILS 1 4rp� I_. E-4 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS 1 _ dean Trl _ E-5 DISPENSER CUT SHEETS 1 E-6 SWITCHGEAR CUT SHEETS 1 E-7 ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS 1 - . SITE Z _ � W G �• Z O N an Ul?tiC! t W moo ZOO= Z I DATE 4/2/2024 SHEET TITLE y - CHARGING STATIONS COORDINATES: FOR REFERENCE ONLY DRAWINGS 45.295730,-93.800562 _ COVER SHEET CONTRACTOR NOTE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE INSTALL PER THE SIGNED AND THE SEALED SET CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS, EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON NAME: SHEET NUMBER OF DRAWINGS. ANY NECESSARY DEVIATIONS FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY �� SUBMITTED THROUGH AN RFI REQUEST PROCESS WITH ENGINEERING FOR AN DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. PE#: APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR PROCEEDING WITH A DEVIATION OF THE SIGNED AND SEALED SET OF DRAWINGS. Know what's below ENGINEERING COMPANY NAME: Call before you dig. PAGE NUMBER OF 13 I�' UNNEEW % ....... ...... k- I hr 41F .0000, 4111E 00000, /000, 0 -0 0 0 40 400P PROPOSED AREA OF WORK PROPOSED POINT OF CONNECTION A& -4 OVERALL SITE PLAN OWL4,140"* , Mobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: 4 - Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: License Number. 62439 0 —j —j LLI CN C) LU- C.0 (Y) z Lo 0 Z C) 75; 0 - 00 CY) O LLJ ti < C) C\1 0 �z Y 0 z L = L 0 I ry AW IDATE 4/2/2024 1 SHEET TITLE OVERALL SITE PLAN NUMBER C-1 SCALE: 1 " = 20' PAGE NUMBER 2 OF 13 REMOVE PORTION OF- � EXISTING CONC. CURB (TYPICAL OF 4) — — — — — — — r -- tp- — REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE GRIND DOWN EXISTING STRIPING FOR NEW STALLS AS NEEDED RELOCATE EXISTING VACUUM CLEANERS — COORDINATE WITH OWNER FOR LOCATION I%"IVIV •L 1 V1N 1 IVII V1 EXISTING CONC. CURB (TYPICAL OF 4) DEMOLITION SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 /4" = V-0" GENERAL NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UTILITIES LOCATED PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETURN SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING PLANTERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, AND ANY OTHER FACILITIES DISTURBED BY THE WORK TO THE SAME OR BETTER CONDITION THAN EXISTED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK. 3. ALL QUANTITIES LISTED IN THE DEMOLITION QUANTITIES TABLE ARE ONLY APPROXIMATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES BEFORE DEMOLITION. 4. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIALS ARE TO BE DISPOSED/STOCKPILED IN A LEGAL MANNER. 5. DUST CONTROL TO BE USED AS NEEDED. Owe4 :Mobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: ► / , Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: License Number. 62439 0 J J W N Uwe M Z Lo 0OZ 0 � �00 C > J M cfl Lu ti Q U N _ 0� �e _OZ J U ry A, 0 z DATE 4/2/2024 �mAtsJU>> DEMOLITION PLAN NUMBER C-2 PAGE NUMBER 3OF13 0 NEW CURB SURROUNDING TERRA 184 CHARGERS (TYPICAL OF 6) O,qm PROPOSED TRANSFORMER \ PROPOSED SWITCHGEAR SON NAL BASE PROPOSED L J TERRA 184 CHARGER 2'-0" ON NAL BASE (TYPICAL OF 2) a. CD CL 4,_0„ nn� /O \ 101 101 101 \ \ \ —1 �I 11'-0" � ; ---- --J 6'-0" PROPOSED LIGHT POLE 14'-6" NAL X-LAST BOLLARD (TYPICAL 6) I 6'-0" 12'-0" PROPOSED LIGHT 6'-0" POLE 6'-6" 0 I 00 16— PROPOSED EV� PARKING STENCIL (TYPICAL 4) 11'-0" I 5'-0„ 9'-0„ 11 9'-0" 9'_0" 9,_0„ 9,_0„ I NEW 4" PARKING STRIPING INITIAL EV CHARGERS I FUTURE EV CHARGERS 41 (SEE GENERAL NOTE 1) FUTURE EV PARKING STENCILS TO BE ADDED UPON NEW 4" PARKING STRIPING INSTALALTION OF CHARGERS (TYPICAL 8) . 51 _0 2 ' 9'-0" . 91_01' . 91_01' . 9'-0 f' . 91_017 C) -1 00 '._N u FUTURE TERRA 184 CHARGER ON NAL BASE (TYPICAL OF 4) L0 I N ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CIVIL WORK ASSOCIATED WITH FUTURE CHARGERS TO BE COMPLETE DURING INITIAL CONSTRUCTION. ONLY WORK TO BE DONE DURING FUTURE PHASE IS SETTING AND ENERGIZING THE CHARGER AND ADDING THE NEW STRIPING AND STENCILS. OWL 0410 40, eMobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: ► / , Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: I License Number. 62,09 Z 0 a U to W G Z O >tn W 1z 0 Z DATE A J J W CV Uwco CO Z � 0Z Itp0 � > J M cfl Y W ti Q U_ N0� �oZ LI J�2 U A, 4/2/2024 TITLE ENLARGED SITE PLAN NUMBER C-3 PAGE NUMBER 4 OF 13 s d. ° -.d ° d Ao ° ° 1 *k N (, a °. ° d � d< d ° ° #4@ I ° I° d 12" 06 ° 4 L� a J ° I d a ° ° �7 91, 3._6" A 1 /1Tr—Y, 1.ANCHOR LOCATION AND DIAMETER TO MATCH ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 2.CONCRETE PADS SHALL HAVE A SLOPE OF 2.0% TOWARDS THE PARKING LOT A CD NAL EV HIGH POWER CHARGER FOUNDATION FOR ABB TERRA 184 CHARGERS SEE CUTSHEET ON SHEET E-5 OPTIONAL BOLLARD, SEE SITE LAYOUT USE DRILLED DOWELS FOR TYING TO ADJACENT CONCRETE, SEE TYPICAL DETAIL POURED CONC. SLAB, SEE TYPICAL SECTION NAL X—LAST BOLLARD SEE TYPICAL DETAIL PLAN VIEW - EV CHARGER PAD NO SCALE 4'-9" I'IML VlIUIIVLl UMIJL I VI\ LINCOLN ELECTRIC SWITCHGEAR PLAN VIEW - SWITCHGEAR PAD NO SCALE JOINT FILLER SIKAFLEX 15M (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) PROVIDE 3/4" DIAX16" DOWELS @ 12" O.C. (IF CONC. PAVING) EXISTING PAVEMENT 7 EXISTING FILL /=-7L� I f TYPE 1 COMPACTIBLE MATERIAL #4 REBAR @12" O.C. EACH WAY TOP & BOT �u d d d d a d d < Q d d Q - d d a NOTES: 1.SEE CUT SHEETS ON E-5 FOR FURTHER DETAIL 2.FOLLOW MANUFACTURER PROVIDED INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. 23.23"f 23.62"f NAL EV HIGH POWER CHARGER FOUNDATION FOR ABB TERRA 184 CHARGERS 5'-0"x5'-0" CONC PAD a d d Q d. d d ° . . d' 4 d d .a a ° d d— ^'d d d. d DUCT CONNECTOR FROM ANY SIDE WALL 35MM FROM CHAMBER BASE TYPICAL SECTION - DISPENSER PAD & BASE NO SCALE "0 2 AIAI Il-I COMPACTIBLE ANY SIDE WALL MATERIAL 1 3/8" f FROM CHAMBER BASE TYPICAL SECTION - SWITCHGEAR PAD & BASE NO SCALE a CONTINUOUS . PROVIDE 90° �ORNERS W/ LENGTH #4 REBAR EACH WAY XLAST BOLLARD SOCKET `---- -- --- ` D a I a l ° val I vl o° o I al III II° Da I q v v I DI I 12 I v 1 L L °—L 71$----=F---=— o—.a -- --T F- . 24"f CONCRETE BOLLARD FOUNDATION 24"f 1 d 4 d d ° a d a ° a p ° ° 4 Q d d °' _ I 4 4 al d ° ° ° N XLAST BOLLARD SOCKET NAL X-LAST BOLLARD SOCKET NO SCALE OWL44 :Mobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: ► / , Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: License Number. 62,09 W F G (51 Z DATE 0 W Uwco M Z Lo 0 Z 0 moo � > J M cfl W ti Q U cal 0 _ � �e _OZ J Ir— U A, LJ 4/2/2024 TITLE CIVIL/ STRUCTURAL DETAILS NUMBER D-1 PAGE NUMBER 5OF13 VERIFY WITH POLE MANUFACTURER FOR SIZE, DIAMETER OF BOLT CIRCLE & HEIGHT ABOVE CONCRETE BASE. (ANCHOR BOLTS BY POLE SUPPLIER) NOTE: SECTION NO SCALE MANUFACTURERS BOLT TEMPLATE MUST BE USED FOR SETTING ANCHOR BOLTS FOR CORRECT ORIENTATION OF FIXTURE HEADS. ANCHOR BOLTS AND BOLT TEMPLATE SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH POLE (TYP. ALL FOUNDATIONS). 1-1/2" CHAMFER HORIZONTAL RUBBED CONCRETE FINISH FINISHED GRADE llJ��llJl�llJ�� 2" PVC N SCH. 40 CONDUIT (TELECOMM) -� . ° 2" PVC SCH. 40 CONDUIT (POWER) 12 #6 BARS VERTICALLY - SPACED EQUALLY #3 BAR TIES 0 10" O.C. NOTE: ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR RUN (2) #10 XHHW UP POLE FOR EACH LUMINAIRE 4'-0" 24" 36" fib' • ° 3/4" PVC / ° SCH. 40 CONDUIT #6 CU GRD. 3/4" x 10'-0" GROUND ROD a � 30" DIA LIGHT POLE DETAIL NO SCALE BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS A. MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE, 2020 EDITION &AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS (ASCE)-MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (ASCE 7) C.FOR ALL OTHER REFERENCED STANDARDS, USE THE LATEST EFFECTIVE VERSION. DESIGN CRITERIA AND LOADS A. RISK CATEGORY......................................................................................................II B.DEAD LOADS 1. DISPENSER.................................................................................................870 LB 2. POWER CABINET......................................................................................1200 LB C.SNOW LOADS 1. GROUND SNOW LOAD (P LL...............................................................50 PSF 2. SNOW LOAD IMPORTANCE9)FACTOR (6).......................................1.0 D.WIND LOADS 1. BASIC WIND SPEED (V ULT)............................................................109 MPH 2. BASIC WIND SPEED (V ASD)...........................................................84.4 MPH 3. WIND EXPOSURE.....................................................................................0 E. EARTHQUAKE DESIGN DATA 1. SESIMIC OCCUPANCY CATEGORY.....................................................II 2. SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR (6)................................................1.0 3.SS ..................................................................................................................0.050 4. S�.....................................................................................................0.023 5. S E CLASS.................................................................................................D (ASSUMED) 6. SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFCIENTS b.S.............................................................................................................0.037 7. SEIS C DESIGN CATEGORY..................................................................A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A.VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMNESIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK OR FABRICATING MATERIALS. NOTFY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OR RECORD (SEOR) OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY PHASE OF WORK B. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING DIMENSIONS. C.CIVIL.STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTIONS WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL OTHER DRAWINGS INCLUDING BUT NOT LISTED TO ELECTRICAL AND EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS. D.DETAILS LABELED "TYPICAL" ON DRAWINGS APPLY TO SITUATIONS OCCURRIN ON THE PROJECT THAT ARE THE SAME OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SPECIFICALLY DETAILED, SUCH DETAILS APPLY WHETHER OR NOT THE DETAILS ARE REFERENCED AT EACH LOCATION. NOTIFY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. E. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIRIZE THEMSELVES WITH EXISTING STURCTURE AND OTHER CONDITIONS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY BRACINGS, SHORING AND OTHER SAFEGUARDS TO MAIN ALL PARTS OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES IN A SAFE CONDITION DURING THE PROCESS OF DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION AND TO PROTECT FROM DAMAGE THOSE PORTIONS OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. F. THE CONTRACT CIVIL/STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS RESPRESNT THE FINSIHED PROJECT. TH CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOT TH MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE ALL MEASURES REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE STRUCTURE, WORKMEN, AND OTHER PERSONS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION; INCLUDING BRACING, SHORING FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, SHORING FOR THE BUILDING, FORMS AND SCAFFOLDING, SHORING OF RETAINING WALLS AND OTHER TEMPORARY SUPPORTS AS REQUIRED. COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA AND OTHER GOVERNING BODIES HAVING JURISDICTION AT THE SITE. CURB LINE 0 0 io G.LOADINGS FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ARE BASED ON THE UNITS SHOWN ON THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS, ANY CHANGES IN TYPE, SIZE OR NUMBER OF PIECES OF EQUIPMENT SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE SEOR FOR VERIFICATION OF THE ADEQUACY OF SUPPORTING MEMBERS PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF SUCH EQUIPMENT. FOUNDATIONS A.GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NOT PROVIDED. FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASED ON THE ASSUMED BEARING CAPACITY LISTED BELOW BASED ON IBC TABLE 1806.2 FOR TYPE ML AND CL MATERIAL B. NET ALLOWEABLE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY..................................................................1500 PSF C.TE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND OPERATE DEWATERING EQUIPEETN AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAING EXCAVATIONS AND WORK AREAS IN DRY CONDITION. D.ARRANGE FOR A QUALIFED PERSON TO MONITOR CUT AND FILL OPERATIONS, FERFORM FIELD DENSITY TESTS, AND INSPECT BEARING AREAS FOR FOUNDATIONS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY CONCRETE. E. ALL BACKFILL AND TRENCHING OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CURRENT AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY CODES, INCLUDING OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. F. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE SHORING OF THE NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS IN ORDER TO PREVENT ANY DAMAGE DUE TO BACKFILLING AND TRENCHING. G.DO NOT PLACE FOOTINGS OR SLABS AGAINST SUBGRADE CONTAINING FREE WATER, FROST OR ICE. H.PROTECT PIPES AND CONDUITS RUNNING THROUGH WALLS AND SLABS WITH X INCH EXPANSION MATERIAL. AT CONFLICTS BETWEEN BURIED PIPES AND CONDUITS THROUGH FOUNDATIONS, CONTACT SEOR. I. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR AND ELECTRICAL ONE -LINE DIAGRAM FOR PROPER BONDING OF THE FOOTING REINFORCEMENT TO THE GROUNDING SYSTEM. CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE A. STANDARDS 1. ACI 117R/117R- SPECIFICATIONS FOR TOLERANCES FOR CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS AND COMMENTARY. 2. ACI 301- SPECIFICATIONS FOR STURCTURAL CONCRETE 3. ACI 305R- HOT WEATHER CONCRETE 4. ACI 306.1- STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR COLD WEATHER CONCRETING 5. ACI 308.1 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE CURLING 6. ACI 318/318R- BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE AND COMMENTARY 7. CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL INSTITUTE (CRSI)- MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE. B. MATERIALS 1. CONCRETE MIXTURES SHALL BE THE NORMAL WEIGHT TYPE (145 PCF) AND DESIGNED PER ACI 318 USING THE FOLLOWING PARAMETERES, LIMIT FLY ASH AND SLAG 25% OF TOTAL CEMENT. • 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (f'c) ...... 5,000 PSI • CATEGORY F CLASS ....................................... F3 (AIR ENERTAINMENT REQUIRED) • CATEGORY S CLASS.......................................SO • CATEGORY W CLASS.......................................W1 • CATEGORY C CLASS.........................................C2 E 2. NO CALCIUM CHLORIDE OR ADMIXTURES CONTAINING CHLORIDES SHALL BE USED IN ANY CONCRETE. MIX MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: • PORTLAND CEMENT..............................ASTM C150 • FLY ASH....................................................ASTM C618 CLASS C OR F • CLAG CEMENT........................................ASTM C969 GRADE 100 OR 120 • NORMAL WEIGHT AGGREGATE ............ASTM C33 CLASS 3S • WATER......................................................ASTM C94 POTABLE • AIR-ENTRAINING......................................ASTM C260 NOTES: 1.MATCH TYPE AND PROFILE OF EXISTING CURB 7 iA VERTICAL CONTROL JOINT CONC. PAD SEE DETAIL CONC. CURB TYPE 1 COMPACTIBLE MATERIAL COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE TYPICAL CURB DETAIL NO SCALE 3. CHEMICAL ADMIXTURES MUST BE CERTIFIED BY MANUFACTURER TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH OTHER ADMIXTURES AND THAT DO NOT CONTRIBUTE WATER-SOLUBE CHLORINE IONS EXCEEDING THOSE ALLOWED IN HARDENED CONCRETE. 4. STEEL REINFORCEMENT: i. DEFORMED BARS, ASTM A615 GRADE 60. ii. DEFORMED BARS, ASTM A706, GRADE 60 WELDABLE. M.CHAIRS SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL OR PLASTIC. 5. ACCESSORIES iv.DOWELS AND ANCHOR GROUT: SIKADUR 32 HI MOD OR APPROVED EQUAL. v. CONTRACTION OR CONSTRUCTION JOINT SEALANT: SIKADUR 51 SL OR APPROVED EQUAL. VUSOLATION JOINT SEALANT: SIKAFLEX-1 a OR APPROVED EQUAL. vii. PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT FILLER(PMF): HOMEX 300 OR APPROVED EQUAL. C. EXECUTION a.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE MAINTAIN THE FOLLOWING CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCEMENT. • CONCRETE CAST AGAINIST EARTH .............................3 INCHES • CONCRETE EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER: -#5 AND SMALLER BARS ............................1 X INCHES -#6 AND LARGER BARS...............................2 INCHES b. STEEL REINFORCING SHALL BE FABRICATED ACCORDING TO CRSI. c.ALL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE SUPPORTED AND HELD IN PLACE BY MANUFACTURED STEEL WIRE OR PLASTIC BAR SUPPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRSI. USE OF ANY OTHER MATERIALS WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION BY THE SEOR IS PROHIBITED. d. PROVIDE STANDARD 90 DEGREE HOOKS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. e. RESHAPING OF BARS AFTER INITIAL BENDING IS NOT PERMITTED. f. PROVIDE CLASS "B" REINFORCEMENT SPLICES FOR CONTINOUS REINFORCEMENT, REINFORCEMENT SPLICES AND DEVELOPMENT LENGTHS SHALL BE ACCORDANCE WITH ACI318. g. WHERE REQUIRED AND UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, PROVIDE DOWELS TO MATCH SIZE AND SPACINING OF MAIN REINFORCEMENT. h. DO NOT WELD REINFORCEMENT IN THE FIELD UNLESS SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS OR APPROVED BY SEOR. i. FORMWORK MAY BE OMITTED FOR FOUNDATIONS PROVIDED EARTH IS FIRM AND STABLE AND CONCRETE SURFACES WILL NOT BE EXPOSED TO PUBLIC VIEW. EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE CUT NEAT AND ACCURATE TO SIZE. LOOSE AND UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPACTED OR REMOVED. j.000RDINATE PLACEMENT OF CAST -IN -PLACE EMBEDMENTS AND ANCHOR RODS WITH A TEMPLATE, SECURELY ATTACH EMBEDEMENT ITEMS TO FORMWORK OR REINFORCING. k. PLACE CONCRETE IN ONE LAYER OR IN HORIZONTAL LAYERS OF SUCK THICKNESS SO THAT NO NEW CONCRETE WILL BE PLACED ON CONCRETE THAT HAS HARDENED ENOUGH TO CAUSE SEAMS OR PLACES OF WEAKNESS (COLD JOINTS) I. PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTION AND ISOLATION JOINTS AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ARE NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OR APPROVED BY SEOR. M. SURFACE OF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE CLEANED AND LAITANCE REMOVED. IMMEADITLY BEFORE NEW CONCRETE IS PLACED, ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE WETTED AND STANDING WATER REMOVED. JOINT SEALER, HOLD DOWN 1/4" FROM TOP OF CURB JOINT FILLER, HOLD DOWN 1 1 /4" FROM TOP OF CURB #3 BAR HOLD BACK 4" FROM JOINT CONC. CURB n.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, CHAMFER ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE 3/4 INCH. o. BEGIN CURING PROCEDURES IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETEING PLACEMENT AND CONTINUE FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) ACCEPTABLE DAYS. CONCRETE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM PREMATURE DRYING, EXCESSIVELY HOT OR COLD TEMPERATURES AND MECHNAICAL INJURY. p. UNCOATED ALUMINUM MATERIALS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE. q. NO ADDITIONAL WATER SHALL BE ADDED TO THE CONCRETE MIXTURE ON SITE UNLESS WATER IS WITHHELD AT THE PLANT AND NOTED AS SUCH ON THE BATCH TICKET, ONLY THE AMOUNT WITHHELD MAY BE ADDED ON SITE. r. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE VIBRATED BY MECHANICAL VIBRATORS. �_ W _ TYPICAL CHARGING STALL DIMENSIONS NO SCALE OWL4 i Mobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: License Number. 62439 0 J LLI Uwe z Lo 0 Z 0 i �00 C > J C'7 O LIJ ti Q U_ N0� OZ J � U An z 0 (L W 0 z 0 U) Ix 0 z DATE 4/2/2024 SHEET TITLE CIVIL/ STRUCTURAL DETAILS NUMBER D-2 PAGE NUMBER 6 OF 13 / 441 40 X 10 / kq Ac�h' PROPOSED POINT OF CONNECTION TIE INTO EXISTING PRIMARY AT EXISTING TRANSFORMER X FUTURE TERRA 184 EV CHARGER ON NAL BASE �p 0 (TYPICAL 4) / E E E E E E PROPOSED / TRANSFORMER PROPOSED SWITCHGEAR m ON NAL BASE / TERRA 184 \ EV CHARGER ON NAL BASE \\ OWL4` (TYPICAL 2) :Mobility PROPOSED L LIGHT POLE m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional fthe state ofMinnesota Engineer under the laws o I m I I L_--� --J NEW ELECTRICAL LINES SEE CONDUIT - AND WIRING SCHEDULE ON E-3 EMPTY CONDUIT FOR FUTURE CHARGERS ENERGIZE LIGHT POLES DURING INITIAL WORK E E m n L-Ljj_1 m O O 0 m E E E E E E E m E m m m m m i m 1 INITIAL EV CHARGERSFUTURE EV CHARGERS (SEE GENERAL NOTE 1) E E \ FF7 \ N ► ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 /4" = V-0" GENERAL NOTES 1. CONDUIT ROUTING IS DIAGRAMMATICALLY SHOWN ON PLANS AND ARE ONLY APPROXIMATIONS. THE EXACT LOCATION AND ROUTING PATHS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AND INSTALLED PER JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO DIGGING TRENCHING. 2. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK AND RELATED ACTIVITIES PERFORMED ONSITE SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC) AND APPLICABLE STANDARDS. 3. UTILITY EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS AND PREP WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY ENGINEER TO ENSURE ACCURACY OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. ALL CIVIL WORK ASSOCIATED WITH FUTURE CHARGERS TO BE COMPLETE DURING INITIAL CONSTRUCTION. ONLY WORK TO BE DONE DURING FUTURE PHASE IS SETTING AND ENERGIZING THE CHARGER AND ADDING THE NEW STRIPING AND STENCILS. Signature: ► / , Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: License Number. 6209 z 0 t, c.� V! W G z 0 0 k 0 z DATE 0 J J W N Uwco M Z Lo 0OZ 0 � �00 C > J M cfl W ti Q U N _ 0� �e _OZ J � U AW 4/2/2024 TITLE ELECTRICAL ENLARGED SITE PLAN NUMBER E-1 PAGE NUMBER 7OF13 NEW METER r\I[­Tr)I AI ITI/%AI /NA r)IA IrT 11r\rl A NEW L PRIMAf CONDI CONDUIT AND WIRING SCHEDULE FROM TO CONFIGURATION PROPOSED UTILITY PROPOSED 5 SETS OF (4) 600 KCMIL CU (THWN)+ O TRANSFORMER 480V SWITCHBOARD IN 4" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT+ (BY OTHERS) 4" SPARE CONDUIT PROPOSED UTILITY PROPOSED 1-1/4" PVC CONDUIT FOR METERING CIRCUITS PER UTILITY O2 TRANSFORMER METER (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED PROPOSED DC 1 SET OF (3) 500 KCMIL CU (THWN) 1 KV + 3O 480V SWITCHBOARD DISPENSER (POST) #3 AWG CU GND IN DC POWER 4" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT + 4" SPARE CONDUIT O4 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD FUTURE DC DISPENSER (POST) (2) 4" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS DC POWER PROPOSED PROPOSED �2� �12 AWG CU (THWN-2) + O PANELBOARD SITE LIGHTING 1 12 GND IN 120/208V SECTION 1 SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT NETWORK PROPOSED DC SHIELDED CAT6 W/ O SWITCH DISPENSER (POST) RJ45 TERMINATIONS IN COMMUNICATION 1" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT NETWORK FUTURE DC (1) 1" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS O7 SWITCH DISPENSER (POST) COMMUNICATION M D P —1 LOAD CALCULATION LIGHTING 0.5 KVA X 125% = 0.7 KVA RECEPTACLE TOTAL .2 KVA 1 ST 10.00 KVA X 100% = 0.2 KVA REMAIN 0.00 KVA X 50% = 0.0 KVA MOTORS TOTAL 0.00 KVA X 100% LARGEST KVA X 125% = 0.0 KVA REMAIN 0.00 KVA X 100% = 0.0 KVA A/C 0.00 KVA X 100% = 0.0 KVA HEATING 0.00 KVA X 100% = 0.0 KVA LOCKED -OUT LOAD KVA X 100% = 0.0 KVA KITCHEN 0.00 KVA X 65% = 0.0 KVA DATA PROCESSING 0.00 KVA X 85% = 0.0 KVA MISCELLANEOUS 360.0 KVA X 100% = 360 KVA (EV CHARGERS) MISCELLANEOUS 720.0 KVA X 100% = 720 KVA (FUTURE EV CHARGERS) TOTAL LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER LAMPING MTG NOTES 1. TYPE IV DISTRIBUTION. ARCHITECTURAL BEACON LED LIGHT � ARM MOUNTED VP-L 80NB-180 4K T4 UNV PEC RA WHT ON A 20,0001m 25' POLE POLE FULL CUTOFF LED AREA LIGHT SSS-13-25-40-13-1-133-WHT POLE 180W = 1080.9 KVA = 1300.2 AMPS @480V NOTES 1. NO EXPOSED 480VAC AND 120VAC WIRING PERMITTED INSIDE DISTRIBUTION CABINET 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MINIMUM 4" SLACK CABLE AT ALL EQUIPMENT TERMINALS. LESS SLACK IS PERMITTED WHERE EQUIPMENT LAYOUT DOES NOT PERMIT SUFFICIENT SPACE 3. CONTRACTOR TO LABEL MAIN SWITCH TO INDICATE MAXIMUM RATING. 4. PROVIDE ALL LABELING REQUIRED BY NEC. LABELING SHALL CORRESPOND TO EQUIPMENT DESIGNATION SHOWN IN ONE LINE DIAGRAM 5. NETWORK SWITCH SHALL BE LOCATED IN TELECOM PANEL 'HTING CELL SYMBOL DESCRIPTION CIRCUIT BREAKER 1) 4 A TRIP "##A F" - INDICATES AMPERAGE FRAME RATING J #P "##A TRIP" - INDICATES AMPERAGE TRIP RATING "#P" - INDICATES NUMBER OF POLES 1 ##AS FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH "##AS" - INDICATES SWITCH SIZE ##AF "##AF" - INDICATES FUSE SIZE 1 #A/#P / NON -FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH VA" - INDICATES SWITCH SIZE 1 VP" - INDICATES NUMBER OF POLES TRANSFORMER Z GROUNDING CONNECTION PANEL PANELBOARD - REFER TO PANELBOARD SCHEDULES FOR PP1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OWL4,1404, i Mobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: License Number. 62439 0 Ci J z DATE 0 J L LI N Uwe z�Lo 0 z i 0 �00 C > J C'7 O LLJ ti Q U N _ 0 � Y Oz J 75 U An 4/2/2024 TITLE ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM NUMBER E-2 PAGE NUMBER 8OF13 GRADE FINAL GRADE SPARE 4" PVC CONDUIT FOR FUTURE PROOFING NOTES: 1. USE THIS DETAIL FOR SERVICE ENTRANCE AND FOR CONDUITS TO/FROM METERING AND TRANSFORMER. TYPICAL SERVICE ENTRANCE DETAIL NO SCALE NOTE 1. REBAR BONDED TOGETHER WITH STEEL TIE WIRES OR EXOTHERMIC WELDING SEE PLAN PROPOSED CONCRETE #4 AWG BARE Cu GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR SEE NOTE 1 NON-METALLIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE ►I�I�I�II�� 1 PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH EARTH PROPOSED COMPACTED CLEAN GRAVEL CONCRETE ENCASED ELECTRODE DETAIL NO SCALE FINAL GRADE NOTES: 1. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS 0001 FOR DIRECTIONAL DRILL REQUIREMENTS. 2. ALL CONDUITS TO BE PULLED TOGETHER WITHOUT INTENTIONAL SEPARATION. 3. DEPTH OF BURIAL MAY BE REDUCED TO CODE MINIMUM AT RECEIVING & ENTRANCE PITS. 4. CONTRACTOR MAY UTILIZE DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR THE CONDUIT RUN BETWEEN THE DISTRIBUTION PANEL AND THE CHARGERS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND OWNER. TYPICAL DETAIL FOR DIRECTIONAL BORING NO SCALE FINAL GRADE NOTES: 1. QTY 2 4" CONDUCTOR CONDUIT, QTY 1 1" COMMUNICATIONS CONDUIT TO BE USED FOR ALL CHARGER POSITIONS CONDUITS FOR EACH CHARGER NO SCALE CADWELD CONNECTIONS OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL d CABLE TO REBAR HORIZONTAL SPLICE PARALLEL HORIZONTAL CONDUCTORS TEE CONNECTION HORIZONTAL CABLE TAP TO VERTICAL REBAR SPLICE OF HORIZONTAL CABLES PARALLEL THROUGH CONNECTION OF HORIZONTAL CABLES TYPE RJ TYPE SS TYPE PT HORIZONTAL STEEL SURFACE PARALLEL HORIZONTAL CONDUCTORS BURNDY CONNECTIONS OR ENGINEER APPROVED TO FLAT STEEL SURFACE OR PARALLEL DEAD END TAP OR HORIZONTAL THRU CONDUCTOR EQUAL HORIZONTAL PIPE TYPE HS TYPE PC 0 p BOND JUMPER VERTICAL PIPE VERTICAL STEEL SURFACE CABLE DOWN AT 450 TO VERTICAL FIELD FABRICATED GREEN STRANDED CABLE DOWN AT 450 TO RANGE OF INSULATED VERTICAL PIPES STEEL SURFACE INCLUDING PIPE TYPE 2-YA-2 TYPE VS TYPE VS 0 0 COPPER LUGS HORIZONTAL TEE THROUGH CABLE TO TWO HOLE -LONG BARREL LENGTH TEE OF HORIZONTAL RUN AND GROUND ROD THROUGH CABLE TO TOP OF GROUND TAP CABLES ROD TYPE YA-2 TYPE TA TYPE GT CONCRETE ENCASED ELECTRODE DETAIL NO SCALE NOTES: WHITE LETTERING MAIN BREAKER ON RED SIGN FUNCTION AS EMERGENCY DISCONNECT FOR POWER TO CHARGING STATIONS 5" WHITE LETTERING ON RED SIGN 1. TO BE PLACED BY THE MAIN BREAKER INSIDE SWITCHBOARD. EMERGENCY y DISCONNECT/ MAIN BREAKER LOCATED INSIDE 10" A 1 ^-rr-r- 1. TO BE PLACED ON OUTSIDE OF SWITCHBOARD SECTION HOUSING THE MAIN BREAKER. EMERGENCY DISCONNECT SIGN DETAIL NO SCALE 1. ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL 3/8" DIAMETER OR LARGER. ALL HARDWARE 18-8 STAINLESS STEEL INCLUDING LOCK WASHERS, COAT ALL SURFACES WITH AN ANTI —OXIDANT COMPOUND BEFORE MATING. 2. NEC 250.121 EXCEPTION: A WIRE —TYPE EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE WITH 250.6(A) AND THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH THE EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR AND THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR IN PARTS II, III, AND VI OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE PERMITTED TO SERVE AS BOTH AN EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR AND A GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR. DWL4'104� i Mobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: 14-v­tr(/ Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: License Number. 62439 z 0 (L W 0 z 0 V) a ac Ld 0 0 z DATE 0 J LL I N Uwe Z�Lo 0 Z i 0� 00 C > J C'7 O W ti Q U N _ 0 � Y OZ J 75 U An u 4/2/2024 TITLE ELECTRICAL DETAILS NUMBER E-3 PAGE NUMBER 9OF13 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS SCOPE OF WORK 1. INSTALL COMPLETE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM INCLUDING POWER AND CONTROL WIRING TO CONNECT THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (EVSE, ALSO KNOWN AS CHARGERS) TO THE GRID. 2. IN GENERAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: a. PROVIDE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION CABINET b. PROVIDE FREE STANDING METER BASE ACCORDING TO UTILITY STANDARDS. C. SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALL CONDUIT AND WIRING SYSTEMS. d. SUPPLY AND INSTALL SYSTEM GROUNDING PER CODE. e. MAKE ALL POWER AND CONTROL CONNECTIONS. f. COMMISSION ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PER NETA ATS STANDARDS AND MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. g. OBTAIN UTILITY CONNECTION AUTHORIZATION. h. PROVIDE QUALIFIED ELECTRICAL SUPPORT DURING EVSE COMMISIONING BY OTHERS. i. SITE LIGHTING CONSISTING OF POLE, ILLUMINATED SIGN, SITE LIGHT AND SIGNAGE 3. THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER FOR INSTALLATION BY THE CONTRACTOR: a. ELECTRICAL VEHICLE POWER SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (CHARGERS) b. ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION CABINET 4. THE UTILITY WILL SUPPLY POWER TO THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL WORK IDENTIFIED AS CUSTOMER SCOPE ON THIS DRAWING AND COORDINATE THE CONNECTION WITH THE UTILITY. GENERAL 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, SUPERVISION, TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, SERVICES AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK AS OUTLINED ON THE DRAWINGS. PROVIDE ALL MINOR ITEMS AND WORK NOT SHOWN OR SPECIFIED BUT WHICH ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK. 2. WORK WHICH IS INDICATED, BUT NOT COMPLETELY DETAILED SHALL BE INSTALLED BY COMMON PRACTICE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 3. ARRANGE WORK NEATLY AND IN COMPACT FASHION TO MAXIMIZE SPACE AVAILABLE TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE MATERIALS AND/OR EQUIPMENT AS INDICATED AND TO ACCOMMODATE EQUIPMENT AND/OR MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY OTHER TRADES AS WELL AS TO ACCOMMODATE UNPLANNED FUTURE EQUIPMENT. VERIFY SPACES IN WHICH WORK IS TO BE INSTALLED. INSTALL CONDUIT AND CABLE RUNS TO MAINTAIN HEADROOM AND CLEARANCES TO CONSERVE SPACE. CINFORM CONTRACT MANAGER OF ANY CHANGES OR ADDITIONS TO MATERIALS, AND/OR EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE AS -FOUND CONDITIONS (RUNS AROUND EXISTING SERVICES, ETC.). 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND COST OF ALL REPAIRS TO SERVICES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CODES AND STANDARDS 1. ALL SUPPLIED MATERIAL AND WORK SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NEC STANDARD. ALL SUPPLIED EQUIPMENT MUST BE DESIGNED, BUILT, TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELEVANT STANDARDS FOR ILLINOIS, USA AND MUST BE MARKED WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVALS. 2. REFER TO LATEST VERSION OF NEC STANDARD FOR ACCEPTABLE MARKING. ALL COSTS RELATED TO APPROVALS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE VENDOR. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR INSPECTIONS AND OBTAIN CONNECTION APPROVALS FOR THE PROJECT. THE OWNER SHALL ARRANGE FOR PLAN REVIEW. CONTRACT DRAWINGS 1. IF DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS IN THE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS ARE FOUND, OR IF THE INTENT OR MEANING IS NOT CLEAR, ADVISE THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER TO CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE SUBMITTING TENDER. CONSTRUCTION/SHOP DRAWINGS 1. SUBMIT DATA AND SHOP DRAWINGS OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF MANUFACTURING OR INSTALLING WITH THE EXCEPTION OF CONDUIT, STANDARD CONDUIT FITTINGS AND LOW VOLTAGE WIRING. 2. OBTAIN MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION DIRECTIONS TO AID IN PROPERLY EXECUTING THE WORK. SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF SUCH DIRECTIONS TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR USE IN INSPECTING THE WORK. RECORD DRAWINGS 1. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, OBTAIN TWO SETS OF ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR SHOWING "AS BUILT' CONDITIONS. AS JOB PROGRESSES, MARK ON FIELD SET OF PRINTS TO INDICATE ACCURATELY ALL INSTALLED WORK. AT COMPLETION STAGE, TRANSFER ALL INFORMATION ONTO MASTER SET OF DRAWINGS AND INDICATE "CONTRACTORS CERTIFIED APPROVAL OF ACCURACY' BEFORE SUBMITTING TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR REVIEW AND RECORD USE. 2. SHOW ON THE RECORD DRAWINGS AS -BUILT, ALL OUTLETS AND EQUIPMENT SUCH AS RUNS OF CONDUIT, LOCATIONS OF PULL BOXES, LIGHT FIXTURE LOCATIONS, EQUIPMENT, OUTLETS, MOTORS, PANELS, ETC., AS WELL AS ALL SERVICES ENTERING THE BUILDING AND ON THE PROPERTY. 3. DIMENSION UNDERGROUND SERVICES AND CONCEALED MAIN AND SUB -FEEDER CONDUITS AT KEY POINTS OF EVERY RUN IN RELATION TO STRUCTURE AND BUILDING. RECORD ALL ELEVATIONS FOR UNDERGROUND SERVICES IN RELATION TO THE GROUND FLOOR LEVEL OF THE BUILDING. INDICATE ON RECORD DRAWINGS, LOCATION OF ALL BURIED SERVICES. THIS INFORMATION IS TO BE CERTIFIED CORRECT BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER BEFORE BACKFILLING COMMENCES. 4.INDICATE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL SERVICES LEFT FOR FUTURE WORK. ARC FLASH STUDY 1. CONDUCT AN ARC FLASH STUDY AND PROVIDE AN ARC FLASH REPORT DETAILING AVAILABLE CALCULATED ARC FLASH ENERGY AT ALL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS. THE ARC FLASH STUDY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND CERTIFIED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. OBTAIN AVAILABLE SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT VALUES AT THE SERVICE LOCATION FROM THE UTILITY. 2. PROVIDE ARC FLASH LABELS THAT COMPLY WITH PRACTICES BASED ON NFPA 70E 2020 . 3. ARC FLASH STUDY SHALL COMPLY WITH PRACTICES BASED ON NFPA 70E 2020, "STANDARD FOR ELECTRICAL SAFETY IN THE WORKPLACE ". 4.PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF ARC FLASH STUDY TO OWNER AND 1 COPY TO ENGINEER OF RECORD. SITE CONDITIONS 1. TEMPERATURE RANGE FOR ALL SUPPLIED EQUIPMENT: -40°C TO +40°C 2. ALTITUDE: <1000 M ASL QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, EQUIPMENT SHALL BE OF A MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD DESIGN. 2. FACTORY -ASSEMBLE CONTROL PANELS AND COMPONENT ASSEMBLIES. FINISHES 1. ALL SHOP FINISHES FOR STEEL ENCLOSURES SHALL INCLUDE CLEANING, IRON PHOSPHATE WASH, RINSING, RUST RESISTANT PRIMER INSIDE AND OUTSIDE, AND AT LEAST TWO COATS OF FINISH ENAMEL WITH APPROPRIATE BAKING TO CURE EACH PAINT APPLICATION. a. APPLY ALL FINISHES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINISH -SUPPLIERS INSTRUCTIONS. b. PROVIDE COPIES OF THE APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS AND/OR FINISH TEST REPORTS AS INDICATED OR UPON REQUEST. C. PAINT AND PRIMER APPLICATION SHALL BE POWDER COAT UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED OR APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. 2. COLORS: a. PAINT OUTDOOR/INDOOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT: WHITE (MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD) 3. STAINLESS STEEL ENCLOSURES SHALL NOT BE PAINTED. 4. ON SITE, CLEAN AND TOUCH UP ANY SCRATCHED OR MARRED SURFACES ON SHOP -PAINTED EQUIPMENT SCRATCHED OR MARRED DURING SHIPMENT OR INSTALLATION, TO MATCH ORIGINAL PAINT. 5. CLEAN AND PRIME EXPOSED NON -GALVANIZED AND NON -STAINLESS HANGERS, RACKS AND FASTENINGS TO PREVENT RUSTING. WARNING SIGNS 1. AS SPECIFIED AND TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ELECTRICAL INSPECTION DEPARTMENT AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 2. DECAL SIGNS, MINIMUM SIZED 7" X 10". 3. PROTECT EXPOSED LIVE EQUIPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR PERSONNEL SAFETY. 4. SHIELD AND MARK LIVE PARTS WITH APPROPRIATE VOLTAGE VALUES IN ENGLISH. SINGLE LINE ELECTRICAL DIAGRAMS 1. MOUNT A SINGLE LINE ELECTRICAL DIAGRAM INSIDE THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION CABINET. 2. DRAWINGS: 8.5" X 11 " MINIMUM SIZE. 3. SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACT MANAGER. INSTALLATION - GENERAL 1. MAINTAIN AT THE JOB SITE, AT ALL TIMES, QUALIFIED PERSONNEL AND SUPPORTING STAFF, WITH PROVEN EXPERIENCE IN ERECTING, SUPERVISING TESTING PROJECTS OF COMPARABLE NATURE AND COMPLEXITY. 2. EXPEDITE THE WORK AS FOLLOWS: a. CONTINUOUSLY CHECK AND EXPEDITE DELIVERY OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS. b. IF NECESSARY, INSPECT AT THE SOURCE OF MANUFACTURE. C. CONTINUOUSLY CHECK AND EXPEDITE THE FLOW OF NECESSARY INFORMATION TO AND FROM ALL PARTIES INVOLVED. d. INFORM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PROMPTLY AS IS REQUIRED. WORKMANSHIP 1. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT, CONDUIT AND CABLES IN A WORKMANLIKE MANNER TO PRESENT A NEAT APPEARANCE AND TO FUNCTION PROPERLY. 2. INSTALL EXPOSED SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT NEATLY AND GROUPED WITHOUT CONFLICT TO OTHER SERVICES. 3. INSTALL EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS REQUIRING MAINTENANCE, ADJUSTMENT OR EVENTUAL REPLACEMENT WITH DUE ALLOWANCE THEREFORE, IN TERMS OF SPACE AND ACCESSIBILITY. 4. INCLUDE IN THE WORK ALL REQUIREMENTS OF MANUFACTURERS SHOWN ON THE SHOP DRAWINGS OR MANUFACTURERS' INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MAKE PROVISION FOR FUTURE EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN 5. REPLACE WITHOUT EXTRA COST WORK UNSATISFACTORY TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 6. PROTECT ALL EQUIPMENT FROM DAMAGE DURING DELIVERY TO THE SITE AND DURING INSTALLATION. MAKE GOOD ANY DAMAGE OR DETERIORATION WHATSOEVER AND HAVE IT COVERED BY REPLACEMENT GUARANTEE. SECURING OF EQUIPMENT 1. SECURE EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS OR USING EXPANDABLE INSERTS, PROPERLY SIZED FOR THE LOAD TO BE CARRIED. 2. SECURE ALL EQUIPMENT, AS SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL 1. ENSURE THAT ROUTE AND DEPTH OF EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SERVICES ARE AS INDICATED. PROVIDE PROTECTIVE MATERIALS AROUND AND OVER SERVICES AND BE PRESENT AT ALL TIMES DURING EXCAVATION AND BACKFILLING TO SUPERVISE WORK. 2. SUPPLY, PLACE AND MAINTAIN SHEETING, BRACING AND SHORING AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT SIDES OF EXCAVATIONS TO PREVENT MOVEMENT WHICH CAN REDUCE NECESSARY WIDTHS OF EXCAVATIONS OR OTHERWISE INJURE OR DELAY WORK OR ENDANGER ANY PERSON. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF EXCAVATIONS WHERE REQUIRED TO PREVENT ADVERSE EFFECTS OF RAIN OR ANY OTHER WEATHER CONDITIONS ON EXPOSED EXCAVATIONS. 4. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, CONTACT THE CONTRACT MANAGER. 5. IF HAND DIGGING IS REQUIRED, CONTACT THE CONTRACT MANAGER. 6. THE POSITION OF POLE LINES, CONDUITS, SEWERS, WATERMAINS AND OTHER UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES IS NOT SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. BEFORE STARTING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INFORM THEMSELVES OF THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL SUCH UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES AND SHALL ASSUME ALL LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE DONE TO THEM. 7. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TEMPORARY SUPPORT AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL UTILITIES WHEN CROSSING OR WORKING NEAR THEIR SERVICES. GROUNDING 1. THE CONSTRUCTION OF STATION GROUNDING GRID SHALL COMPLY WITH THE RULES IN THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2017. 2. MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS: CABLE DIAMETER X 6. WIRING - GENERAL 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ALL POWER AND CONTROL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN DIRECT -BURIED PVC CONDUIT. 1. ALL CONDUCTORS ARE TO BE CONTINUOUS WITH NO SPLICES FOR EACH APPLICATION. 2. TWIST ON WIRE NUT CONNECTORS ARE ONLY PERMITTED FOR LIGHTING AND RECEPTACLE CIRCUITS. 3. ALL CONDUCTORS SHALL BE STRANDED COPPER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 4. ALL WIRING SHALL BE PERMANENTLY LABELED WITH SOURCE AND DESTINATION. 5. PROVIDE A DEDICATED EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR WITH GREEN JACKET IN ALL RACEWAYS INCLUDING PVC AND METALLIC CONDUITS. GROUNDING AND BONDING CONDUCTORS ARE TO BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2017 - LATEST EDITION. 6. PROVIDE CAT6A CABLES FROM EACH CHARGER AND POWER BLOCK TO TELECOM CABINET. 7. NO TOP OR SIDE ENTRY SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONDUIT OR CABLE CONNECTIONS. WIRING TERMINATIONS 1. LUGS, TERMINALS, SCREWS USED FOR TERMINATION OF WIRING TO BE SUITABLE FOR EITHER COPPER OR ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS. 2. WHERE STRANDED CONDUCTORS TERMINATE ON A SCREW TERMINAL, THE CONDUCTOR WILL BE TERMINATED WITH A FULL RING TERMINAL. 3. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL MORE THAN ONE (1) CONDUCTOR OR GROUND BE INSTALLED IN A SCREW TYPE CONNECTOR, LUG OR TERMINAL BLOCK. CLEANING 1. BEFORE ENERGIZING ANY SYSTEM, INSPECT AND CLEAN ALL THE INSIDE OF ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE THAT THEY ARE FREE FROM DUST AND DEBRIS. 2. AT TIME OF FINAL CLEANING, CLEAN LIGHTING REFLECTORS, LENSES, AND OTHER LIGHTING SURFACES THAT HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO CONSTRUCTION DUST AND DIRT. 3. CLEAN ALL POLISHED, PAINTED AND PLATED WORK BRIGHTLY. 4. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS, SURPLUS MATERIAL AND ALL TOOLS. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL (TESTING) 1. PRIOR TO THE OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE, ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS INSTALLED SHALL BE SUBJECT TO AN INSPECTION AND APPLICABLE PERFORMANCE TESTS SUPERVISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER TO ENSURE THAT THE OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 2. TESTS REQUIRING INITIAL POWER -UP OF A SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE MADE WITHOUT NOTIFICATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 3. CONDUCT ALL TESTING BY FULLY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL ONLY. 4. TEST ALL EQUIPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH NETA ATS-2021, "STANDARD FOR ACCEPTANCE TESTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ELECTRICAL POWER EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS" . 5. CLEAN ALL EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO TESTING. 6. DOCUMENT ALL TESTING. RECORD TEST PROCEDURES, ACCEPTABLE RESULTS, ACTUAL RESULTS, REMEDIAL WORK PERFORMED AND FINAL OUTCOME. 7. REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST ALL FUSES, RELAYS, OR OTHER DEVICES DESTROYED DURING FIELD QUALITY CONTROL TESTING. UTILITY CONNECTIONS DETAILS WILL BE FORWARDED UPON RECEIPT. UNTIL DETAILS ARE PROVIDED, ASSUME THE FOLLOWING WORK: 1. COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY FOR CONNECTION. 2. OBTAIN LOCATES. 3. RUN CONDUITS TO RISER POLE/PAD MOUNT TRANSFORMER. 4. PROVIDE SLACK CABLE FOR UTILTY TO MAKE FINAL CONNECTIONS. 5. WHERE CONNECTION IS TO OVERHEAD SYSTEM, PROVIDE CONDUIT, WEATHERHEAD AND STEEL GUARDING FOR RISER. 6. WHERE CONNECTION IS TO PADMOUNT TRANSFORMER, PROVIDE NEMA 2-HOLE LUGS FOR ALL CABLES. 7. PROVIDE METER BASE IN ENCLOSURE AND METERING CABINET WHERE APPLICABLE (SERVICE ENTRANCE >200A). ASSUME ENCLOSURE/CABINET PER NEC AND UTILITY STANDARDS. HEALTH & SAFETY FIELD QUALITY CONTROL (TESTING) 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAFETY OF WORK AREA, ADJACENT AREAS AND BUILDING OCCUPANTS THAT ARE LIKELY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL LOCAL SAFETY REGULATIONS GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK AND SCHEDULE WORK ACTIVITIES WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES WHERE APPLICABLE. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES. 3. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AT END OF DAY TO SECURE AND CLEAN CONSTRUCTION SITE TO ENSURE BUSINESS CONTINUATION 6�iliP►11:7:T1to] iCAIIIIIII a: 1TA11I0ay_l%11:I_10I1�y_19xIrmUI_101 OWL4 i Mobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: License Number. 62439 z 0 i= a W G z 0 rn a ac W F G Ci z DATE 0 J J LLJ N Uwe (y) Z� 0 Z i 0 2i �00 C` ) J O W ti Q U N _ 0 � OZ LI J 2 U A, u 4/2/2024 TITLE ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS NUMBER E-4 PAGE NUMBER 10 OF 13 EV DISPENSER CUT SHEETS 305.3 Size. 305.3.1 New buildings and facilities. In new buildings and facilities. the clear floor space shall be 52 inches (1-3-10 111111) 1111111111t1111 in length and 10 inches (760 111111) 111111ll11um in width, 52 min 1320 ---------- . I I C: o o co iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit Milo ---� FIGURE 305.3.1 SIZE OF CLEAR FLOOR SPACE - NEW BUILDINGS -408.2.1 Unobstructed. where a forward reach is unob- !;tructed, the hi8h forward reach shall be �8 inches (12?0 ram) maximum and the low forward reach shall be 15 twhes (380 mm) minimum aboI the floor - (A) FIGURE 30821 UNOBSTRUCTED FORWARD REACH EV DISPENSER BASE CUT SHEETS G N N TERRA 94-124-184 UL PRODUCT GUIDE Designed for flexibility A configuration for every use case AM Terra 54/94/124/184 C Single outlet CCS with cable management system Power levels • 50 kW • 90 kW • 120 kW / 60 kW shared • 180 kW / 90 kW shared Terra 54/94/124/184 CC Dual outlet CCS with cable management system 2 00 00 Charging standards • CCS+CHAdeMO • CCS-only single outlet • CCS-only dual outlet Terra 54/94/124/184 CJ Dual outlet CCS and CHAdeMO with cable management system and credit card reader _q Cable management • Reliable, tested system • Factory or field install 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BOM TABLE ITEM N0. PART NO. DESCRIPTION QTY. 780 A A 1 9002-0002F-0219-001 TOP PLATE 1 324 324 66 2 9002-0002F-0219-002 TUBE 1 1 an an O {$ 0 N a • oo oa I p w - h Y _ - _ _------ - - � 2 A I tA ISOMETRIC VIEW C SCALE 1: 10 C WELD NOTES: 1. WELD SYMBOLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ISO 2553 : 2019. 0 0 2. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WELDING OF METALLIC MATERIALS. WELDING OF FERRITIC STEELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST ISO STANDARD. AS RELEVANT TO WELDING METHODS ADOPTED. 3. ALL WELDS TO BE DRESSED FLUSH PRIOR TO FINAL FINISH. 2L 4. REMOVE ALL WELD SPLATTER AFTER WELDING PRIOR TO FINAL FINISH. o� D FINISH NOTES: D 1. PRE FINISH CLEAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST ISO STANDARD. 2. HOT DIP GALVANISED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST ISO STANDARD. GENERAL NOTES: o 1. ADAPTER PLATE TO SUIT ABB TERRA EV CHARGERS 54 / 54HV / 94 / 124 / 184. o 2. REFER TO SHEET 2 FOR FURTHER DETAILS & DIMENSIONS FOR ITEMS Ol &( 2 3. FOLLOWING FASTENERS, LOCATING PINS TO BE SUPPLIED. E • 6 x M10 x 20mm LONG HEX HEAD SCREW - BZP E • 6xM10PLAIN WASHERS -BZP SECTION A -A • 4 x M10 LOCATING PINS THIS DRAWING AND ANY INFORMATION OR DRAWN BY: DESCRIPTION: MATERIAL: DESCRIPTIVE MATERIALSET OUT ON IT BAW ADAPTER PLATE (RS219)-TERRA CHARGERS 54, 54HV, 94,124 & 184 See BoM & SHEET 2 ARE THE CONFIDENTIAL AND COPYRIGHT PROPERTY OF NAL LTD AND MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED, COPIED, LOANED IN RI PART ORUSED FOR ANY PURPOSE DRAWN DATE: __"NA WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF NAL LTD. PART NUMBER: FINISH: 29/06/2022 9002-0002F-0219 GALVANISED TO EN ISO 1461 COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTTYPE: CHECKED/APPR'D BY: DRAWING No: SHEET: REV: UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED: ACRHIc*MVANY FABRICATION ASSEMBLY 9002-0002F-0219 1 of 2 A . UNEARTOL.: 10.2 F NAL Ltd, Weir Lane, Worcester, WR24AY • ANGULAR TOL.: 0*15' F PROJECTION METHOD: SHEET SIZE: Tel: 01905 427 100 THIRD ANGLE CHECKED/APPR'D DATE: APPROXWEIGHT: DRAWING SCALE: DRAWING IN ACCORDANCE WITH: . SURFACE FINISH: 0.8µm /� FIRST ISSUE 29/06/2022 SA i I /� e-mail: sales@nal.ltd.uk lvp\-�V� /y3 35.61 Kg 1:5 858888 www.nal.ltd.uk �Y ALL DIMENSIONS: mm (METRIC) DEBURR TO REMOVE ALL SHARP EDGES R0.3 MAX REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED 1 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 '.'4 User access / payment • OCPP Integration • Credit card reader • PIN via Web Tools • Autocharge/ISO15118 W g � A B o a N O z a cg ¢ a Lu he U O TERRA 94-124-184 UL PRODUCT GUIDE Terra DC Fast Chargers Technical specification UL Specifications Terra 54 Terra 94 Terra 124 Terra 184 Electrical Maximum output power AC Input voltage AC input connection Nominal input current and input power rating Recommended upstream circuit breaker(s) Power Factor* Current THD* Short circuit current rating DC output voltage DC output current Efficiency* Interface and Control 50 kW 90 kW 120 kW 180 kW continuous or 60 kW x 2 or 90 kW x 2 480Y / 277 VAC +/- 10% (60 Hz) 3-phase:: L1, L2, L3, GND (no neutral) 64 A, 53.2 kVA 115 A, 96 kVA 153 A, 128 kVA 230 A, 192 kVA limiting available Power limiting available Power limiting available Power limiting available _Power 80 A 150 A 200 A 300 A 65 kA; 10 kA optional CCS-1: 200 - 500 VDC CHAdeMO: 50 - 500 VDC HV version: 200 - 920 VDC 125 A > 0.96 < 5% 65 kA CCS-1: 150 - 920 VDC CHAdeMO: 150 - 500 VDC CCS-1: 200 A; CHAdeMO: 200 A 95% Charging protocols CCS1 and CHAdeMO 1.2 User interface 7" high brightness full color touchscreen display RFID system ISO/IEC 14443A/B, ISO/IEC 15393, FeliCarM 1, NFC reader mode, Mifare, Calypso, (option: Legic) Network connection GSM/3G/4G modem; 10/100 Base-T Ethernet Communication OCPP 1.6 Core and Smart Charging Profiles; Autocharge via OCPP Supported languages English (others available on request) 9 Environment Operating temperature -35 •C to +55 •C / -31 •F to +131 •F (de -rating characteristics apply at extreme temperatures) Recommended storage conditions -10 •C to +70 *C / 14 •F to +158 *C (dry environment) Protection IP54, NEMA 311; indoor and outdoor rated Humidity 5%to 95%, non -condensing Altitude up to 2000 m (6560 ft) General Charge cable 6 m (19.6 ft) Dimensions (H x W x D) 1900 x 565 x 780 mm 1900 x 565 x 880 mm 74.8 x 22.2 x 30.7 in 74.8 x 22.2 x 34.6 in Weight 350 kg / 775 Ibs 350 kg / 775 Ibs 365 kg / 800 Ibs 395 kg / 870 Ibs Compliance and safety UL 2202, CSA No. 107.1-16; UL 2231-1, UL 2231-2, CSA STD C22.2 No. 107.1; NEC Article 625, EN 61851, EN 62196; CHAdeMO 1.2; DIN 70121, ISO 15118; IEC 61000-6-3; EMC Class B, FCC Part 15 *Data shown at nominal output power 2 I 3 700 780 ADAPTER PLATE 324 324 yb 'zu i 134 8 x HOLES M o FRONT o 1 rn 300 o THIS DRAWING AND ANY INFORMATION OR DESCRIPTIVE MATERIAL SET OUT ON IT DRAWN BY: BAW ARE THE CONFIDENTIAL AND COPYRIGHT PROPERTY OF NAL LTD AND MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED, COPIED, . ` LOANED IN WHOLE OR PART OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF NAL LTD. DRAWN DATE: 27/09/2022 COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 4 5 LEFT-EV CHARGER BACK-EV CHARGER O 40 FRONT-EV CHARGER RIGHT-EV CHARGER (OUTPUT CABLES) • PRODUCT SPECIFICATION FOR RETENTION SOCKET WITH STAKKABOX ACCESS CHAMBER RETENTION SOCKETS TOPS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED FROM CAST STEEL TO GS240 OR DUCTILE IRON TO BS2789 500-7 RETENTION SOCKETS MUST BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING HIGH SPEED VEHICLE IMPACT FORCES TO STEEL POSTS WITH A WALL THICKNESS OF 6mm. RETENTION SOCKETS MUST BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND IMPACT WITHOUT ANY STRUCTURAL SURROUND TO THE TOP 80mm OF THE UNIT. A VALID IMPACT TEST MUST RESULT IN A POST DEFLECTION GREATER THAN 30 DEGREES. ALL SOCKETS MUST BE IMPACT TESTED. TEST DATA AND INDEPENDENT CERTIFICATION MUST BE AVAILABLE TO SUBSTANTIATE CLAIMS FOR SOCKETS AND FOUNDATIONS. POSTS MUST BE POSITIVELY SECURED INTO THE RETENTION SOCKETS AND BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND A TURNING MOMENT OF 3.4KNM THROUGH A LOAD OF 230KG @ 1.5METRE FROM THE CENTRE OF POST WITHOUT ANY ROTATION. SECURING MECHANISM OF SOCKETS TO POST MUST NOT DAMAGE THE COATING OR GALVANISED SURFACE OF THE POST. ALL FIXINGS WHICH SECURE POSTS IN PLACE MUST BE HOUSED BELOW GROUND ENSURING NO RISK OF DAMAGE, VANDALISM OR THEFT. RETENTION SOCKET PEDESTRIAN PLUGS MUST BE TESTED TO EN124 - B125 (12.5 TONNE) LOADING. PEDESTRIAN PLUGS MUST BE ABLE TO BE STORED WITHIN THE SOCKET TO ENABLE RAPID DEPLOYMENT IN THE CASE OF AN EMERGENCY ACCESS CHAMBER & ALL OPERATING COMPONENTS MUST BE SERVICEABLE ON SITE WITHOUT REMOVING THE RETENTION SOCKET SOCKET. SYSTEM (RS219) THE RETENTION SOCKET MUST BE CAPABLE OF ACCOMMODATING GRADED SURFACES IN ISOMETRIC VIEW PAVED AREA SUCH AS THOSE AT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. SCALE 1 : 20 • SUPPLIERS OF RETENTION SOCKETS MUST BE ABLE TO SUPPLY EN40 & BD94/17 FOUNDATION DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR ALL SIZES AND DEPTHS OF RETENTION SOCKETS SUPPLIED. • IN THE EVENT OF AN IMPACT TO A RETENTION SOCKET THAT HAS BEEN INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER's INSTRUCTIONS, THE RETENTION SOCKET MUST BE GROUND LEVEL WARRANTIED AGAINST FAILURE. IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES THE MANUFACTURER MUST BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE RETENTION SOCKET AND ALL ASSOCIATED RE- SECTION A -A (ADAPTER PLATE REMOVED FOR CLARITY) ■nl �0 INSTATEMENT COSTS. • RETENTION SOCKETS WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO ACCEPT ADAPTER PLATES FOR ALL EV RAPID CHARGERS • RETENTION SOCKETS WILL BE POSITIVELY FIXED TO THE CHAMBER BELOW • ACCESS CHAMBERS MUST BE MANUFACTURED FROM HIGH GRADE THERMOSET MATERIAL AND BE COMPLETELY RECYCLABLE AT THE END OF LIFE. • ACCESS CHAMBERS SHALL BE A TWIN -WALL DESIGN AND ASSEMBLED FROM STACKABLE 150mm DEEP SECTIONS. • ACCESS CHAMBERS MUST BE TESTED TO WITHSTAND A MINIMUM VERTICAL LOAD OF 90 TONNES WITHOUT THE USE OF CONCRETE SURROUND FOR SUPPORT. ONLY THE RETENTION SOCKET WILL REQUIRE CONCRETE D • EXTERNAL WALLS SHALL HAVE AN EXTERNAL RIB OF WIDTH NO GREATER THAN 15mm, POSITIONED AT THE BOTTOM OF EACH SECTION, TO ALLOW FULL SECTION DEPTH COMPACTION. • EXTERNAL WALLS SHALL BE FREE FROM MOULDING VOIDS THAT WILL NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPACTION WHICH SHOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW ROADS AND STREET WORKS ACT (1991). • ACCESS CHAMBERS MUST NOT BE JOINTED IN THE CORNER OR REQUIRE MECHANICAL FIXING TO ACHIEVE STRENGTH. • ACCESS CHAMBER SECTIONS MUST HAVE THE ABILITY TO BE ADJUSTED IN HEIGHT DURING INSTALLATION BY BEING CUT LATERALLY WITHOUT LOSS OF -STRENGTH TO ALLOW FOR TRANSITIONAL GRADIENT INSTALLATIONS. • ALL RETENTION SOCKETS WITH ACCESS CHAMBER MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE ABOVE SPECIFICATION BY NAL LTD OR ANY EQUALLY APPROVED MANUFACTURER. DESCRIPTION: MATERIAL: EV HIGH POWER CHARGE (HPC) FOUNDATION - See BoM EV CHARGER ABB TERRA 94-124-184 PART NUMBER: FINISH DOCUMENTTYPE: CHECKED/APPR'D BY: DRAWING No: ACpHCOMVANY GENERAL ASSEMBLY 9000-1012 F NAL Ltd, Weir Lane, Worcester, WR2 4AY Tel: 01905 427 100 PROJECTION METHOD: THIRDANGLE SHEETSIZE: CHECKED/APPR'D DATE: APPROX WEIGHT: e-mail: sales@nal.ltd.uk A3 www.nal.ltd.uk 1 1 2 3 min AS SUPPLIED SHEET: REV: UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED: 1 of 1 A . LINEAR TOL.: ±0.2 • ANGULAR TOL.: 0.15' F • SURFACE FINISH: 0.8µm DRAWING SCALE: DRAWING IN ACCORDANCE WITH: AFIRST ISSUE 27/09/2022 Kg 1:10 BS888B ALL DIMENSIONS: mm (METRIC) DEBURR TO REMOVE ALL SHARP EDGES R0.3MAx REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED 4 1 5 1 6 7 1 8 OWL4 eMobility I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: I License Number. 62439 W I' O z DATE 0 J W (V U w `. M� I- J z�Lo 0 �z I 0 "100 J LU ti Q U_ oz J � U An 4/2/2024 TITLE EV DISPENSER STATION CUT SHEETS NUMBER E-5 PAGE NUMBER 11 OF 13 SWITCH GEAR CUT SHEETS I - 45 16 � MMS SW. 7 ® ® �. (2) 15 A., 1-POLE 1 FRONT VIEW (SHOWN WITHOUT DOORS) PRODUCT DESCRIPTION & RATINGS PRODUCT TYPE [ EV-21 - LEVEL-3 SERVICE SWITCHBOARD UTILITY INFORMATION [ N/A] - METER AFTER DISCONNECT (HOT SEQUENCE) POWER SYSTEM DATA [ INCOMING SERVICE ] -SECTION 1 ( BOTTOM FEED) BUS SYSTEM DATA SILVER PLATED COPPER MAIN BUS - DENSITY RATED AT 1000A PER SQUARE INCH - 98%CONDUCTIVITY RATED IN ACCORDANCE W/ UL891 ENCLOSURE DATA - CODE GAUGE, FORMED COVERS & DOORS - ENCLOSURE SHALL CONFORM TO INGRESS PROTECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A TYPE-3R RATING. - EXTERIOR HARDWARE TO BE TAMPER -RESISTANT S.S. SCREWS. - DOOR HANDLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH PADLOCK HASP. FINISH SHALL BE: )K WHITE (STANDARD) ❑ GRAY ❑ GREEN - FRONT & BOTH SIDES OR FRONT & REAR ACCESS REQUIRED TO TERMINATE INCOMING CABLES. CODE STANDARDS - UL891 NAMEPLATES - LAMICOID TYPE, WHITE w/BLACK LETTERS. ACCESSORIES - ENCLOSURE HEATERS W/ HYGROSTAT CONTROL - SERVICE DISCONNECT GROUND FAULT PROTECTION PER N.E.C. 230.95. REFERENCES: - FOR NAMEPLATE DESIGNATIONS SEE'SWITCHBOARD SCHEDULE' SHT-03 LINCOLN ELECTRIC CIRCLE EV CHARGING STATION FRONT VIEW EV-2 XX/XxhDOO( 1OF6 LINCOLN ELECTRIC CIRCLE PRODUCTS CO., INC. B152 SHORT CIRCUIT RATING VOLTAGE AMPERAGE SYSTEM BUSMATERAL ENCLOSURE REV ORAWNGNUMBER PRODUCTS CO., INC. B152 947 LEHIGH AVENUE, UNION, NJ 07083 CHARLOTTE, NC CITY, STATE 947 LEHIGH AVENUE. UNION, NJ 07083 CHARLOTTE, NC WNWLE1949.COM MAIN(OOS B8-2900 65kA. SYM. RMS 480Y/277V AC 2000A 3�, 4W COPPER TYPE-3R 0 xxxxxSB01 WNW.LE1949.0OM MAIN(908)688-2900 3'-0" [CUBICLES OVERALL WIDTH] 45 [� 3'-11" [ROOF OVERALL WIDTH] 1 ''ll 45 1 1 8.25 8.25 3.125 3.125' F--------------1 (4)9118"DIA. 2.125 I I �• I I I W 3.12 I ° BOTTOM I CONDUIT AREA a n O jCj N 16 I I 8 1 I iP — I o o i 2 FRONT �0 'g PLAN VIEW SECTION X-X 1 DOORS OPEN ANCHOR BOLT LOCATIONS & BOTTOM CONDUIT AREAS VLINCOLN ELECTRIC CIRCLE EV CHARGING STATION PLAN VIEW PRODUCTS CO., INC. B152 SHORT CIRCUIT RATING 947 LEHIGH AVENUE. UNION, NJ 07083 CHARLOTTE, INC CITY, STATE W AV.LE1949.COM MAIN(908)688-2900 65kA. SYM. RMS NAL CABINET BASE CUT SHEETS 4'CND 000 ' -�--INCOMING AREA 1" CND N 0000 ---�—OUTGOING AREA 0000 } FRONT EXAMPLE CONDUIT CONFIGURATION BOTTOM CONDUIT AREA SIGNAGE: NPi-UNCOLN NAMEPLATE (2.5" x W ALUMINUM) S1 -DANGER 480 VOLTS (BI-LINGUAL) S2 -DANGER ARC FLASH (BI-LINGUAL) EV-2 XxNxbo= 4OF6 LINCOLN ELECTRIC GE AMPERAGE SYSTEM BUSMATERWL ENCLOSURE REV ORAWNGNUMBER V PRODUCTS CO., INC. 947 LEHIGH AVENUE, UNION. NJ 07083 480Y/277V AC 2000A 3�,4W COPPER TYPE-3R 0 )co=SB01 WWWLH949COM MAIN(908)68&2900 LIFTING HOOKS 37 LEFT -SIDE VIEW (END SECTION) SWITCHBOARD SCHEDULE CUB. DEVICE FRAME TRIP #OF DEVICE LUG INFORMATION CONDUCTOR CABLE LOCN. DESIGNATION MANUFACTURER RATING RATING( TYPEQTY POLES CAT. NO. MATERIAL ENTRY NOTES PHASES CITY NEUTRAL CITY GROUND 1 G.E.C. - - - - - - - - - 2 (1)W350 KCMIL COPPER BOTTOM - 1 INCOMING - - - - - 6 (1)#2-600 KCMIL 6 (1)#2-600 KCMIL - - ALUMINUM BOTTOM - SERVICE SWITCHBOARD 1A 2000A., 30, 4W., 480Yf277V -100% RATED - INTEGRAL GROUND FAULT PROTECTION 2000/3 2000A BUS - MMS (MAINTENANCE MODE SWITCH) 18 MAIN SERVICE DISCONNECT SCHNEIDER •NW LSIG 3 WLIFFV44A9SXXXXXXAZ - - - - - - CONNECTED -PADLOCK HASP - DOOR ESCUTCHEON (CAT. A 833929) - NEUTRAL SENSOR (CAT. #: S48895) I CONTROL COMPARTMENT FACTORY WIRED - I CHARGING CABINET SCHNEIDER 800/3 600A 3 LJP366DOU31XYP 1 (2)#2/G-500 KCMIL 2 (1)#2-600KCMIL 2 (1)#6-350 KCMIL ALUMINUM BOTTOM ADJ. TRIP ICU GND] I CHARGING CABINET SCHNEIDER BOOB 600A 3 LJP36600031XYP 1 (2)#2/0-500 KCMIL 2 (1)#2-600 KCMIL 2 (1)#6350 KCMIL ALUMINUM BOTTOM ADJ. TRIP (CU GND] . PADLOCK HASP 1F CHARGING CABINET SCHNEIDER BOOB BOOA 3 LJP38800031XYP 1 (2)#2/0.500 KCMIL p (1)#2.600 KCMIL 2 (1)#8.350 KCMIL ALUMINUM BOTTOM -MECHANICAL LUGS ADJ. TRIP (CU GND] iG CHARGING CABINET SCHNEIDER 60013 600A ADJ. TRIP 3 LJP36600031XYP 1 (2)#210-500 KCMIL 2 (1)#2-6OO KCMIL 2 (1)#6-350 KCMIL ALUMINUM (CU GND] BOTTOM 1 SPARE SCHNEIDER 15/1 1 BJL16015 1 #14-3/OAWG 1 #14-1/OAWG 1 #14-1/OAWG COPPER BOTTOM - TIERMAL-01AG 1 SPARE SCHNEIDER 15/1 1 511-16015 1 #14-3/OAWG 1 #14-110AWG 1 #14-1/OAWG COPPER BOTTOM - TIERMMAL. G ----- FACTORY HARED REFERENCES: - FOR CONTROL COMPARTMENT DETAILS SEE SHT-06 EV CHARGING STATION ONE -LINE DIAGRAM EV-2 xx/xxhooDE 1 2OF6 __.I LINCOLN ELECTRIC SHORT CIRCUIT RATING VOLTAGE AMPERAGE SYSTEM BUS MATERIAL ENCLOSURE REV DRAWINGNUMBER ■V,/ PRODUCTS CO., INC. CITY, STATE 947 LEHIGH AVENUE, UNION, NJ 07083 65kA. SYM. RMS 480Y/277V AC 2000A 3�, 4W COPPER TYPE-3R 0 xxxxxSB01 WWW.LE1949.00M MAIN(908)688-2900 LIFTING HOOKS XFIIU ]I1x — 45" [SHIPPING SECTION] — FRONT VIEW (EXTERIOR DOORS SHOWN) REFERENCES: - FOR NAMEPLATE DESIGNATIONS SEE'SWITCHBOARD SCHEDULE' SHT-03 - FOR SECTION VIEW'X-X' SEE SHT-04 CIRCLE K I EV CHARGING STATION I SCHEDULE I EV-2 I - I - I xxhabom I 3 OF 6 B152 SHORTCIRCUIT RATING VOLTAGE AMPERAGE SYSTEM BUSMATERMIL ENCLOSURE REV DRAWINGINMBER CHARLOTTE, NC CITY, STATE 65kA. SYM. RMS 480Y/277V AC 2000A 3�, 4W COPPER TYPE-3R 0 xxxxXSB01 TO 480V. BUS TAP---------------------------------------�--� r-- J------------- I r _ _ _ _ CEP FU7.5 CEP FU7.5 I I 1 1 480-12oV., 10 3 KVA., XFMR TB/L I TB/G TB/G TB/N TB/N r-----------------TCB1 T�C62 TCB3 I------------ J j I L---------------------_J I I F- I ETH DC+ DC- PSU I I -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I — —I— GFCI _J I I I I I I I I I L-------- I L-------------I—-------------------------------------J --------------------------------- — HCM J IL--------------------------------------J I L—--------- ------------------------+ —J —_j i1 I MC B CUSTOMERCIRCLE-K CONTROLS COMPARTMENT HTR CABLES THE ENCLOSED ASSEMBLY WILL BE LISTED UNDER UL891 LEGEND: ®-ANTENNA ®i- SCHNEIDER TYPE'MULTI-9' MINATURE CIRCUIT BREAKER: BA TRIP, 1-POLE, 10k A.I.C. 0 240VAC [CAT. M. M9F42108] CB3 SCHNEIDER TYPE'MULTI-9' MINATURE CIRCUIT BREAKER: 15A. TRIP, 1-POLE, 10k A.I.C. @ 24UVAC [CAT. #: M9F42115] CEP -COMPACT FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH [MFR: MERSEN CAT. #CEP-230CC] -TERMINAL BLOCK: 24VDC (-) -TERMINAL BLOCK: 24VDC (+) -FUSE TYPE'FNQ-R IMFR: BUSSMANN CAT. #FNO-R-7 121 -ETHERNET SWITCH CIRCLE EV CHARGING STATION EXTERIOR VIEWS EV-2 xx/xX/X)OO( 5OF6 LINCOLN ELECTRIC CIRCLE B152 SHORTCIRCURRATNG VOLTAGE AMPERAGE SYSTEM BUSMATERAL ENCLOSURE REV ORAWNGNUMBER PRODUCTS CO., INC. B152 947 LEHIGH AVENUE. UNION, NJ 07083 CHARLOTTE, NC 65kA. SYM. RMS 480Y/277V AC 2000A 3�, 4W COPPER TYPE-3R 0 xxxxxSB01 WWW LE1949 COM MAIN (908)688-2900 CHARLOTTE, NC CITY, STATE 1 2 1 3 4 5 6 1 7 1 8 1143 SPECIFICATION FOR EV CABINET BASES WITH CABINET FOOTPRINT ULTIMA CONNECT ACCESS CHAMBERS A A • THE EV CABINET BASE MUST ENABLE THE INSTALLATION OF ALL EV CABINET 209.6 723.9 209.6 TYPES INTO A FULLY ENCLOSED DUCTED SYSTEM ALLOWING ADDITIONAL All B CABLES TO BE INSTALLED WITHOUTTHE NEED TO REMOVE BASE SEAL. I NAL 450 x 450 ANTI -SLIP • EV CABINET BASES TO BE MANUFACTURED FROM GALVANIZED STEEL COMPOSITE COVER (2 NO) • BOTH PLINTH AND CABLE GLAND TRAY TO BE MANUFACTURED WITH PRE - • • DRILLED FIXING POINTS FOR CABINETAND EARTH POINTS. A A CABINET BASE FRAME • CABINET BASES MUST HAVE INTERCHANGEABLE AISANTI SLIP COMPOSITE z T • COVERS ACCESS CHAMBERS MUST BE MANUFACTURED FROM THERMOSET GRP. a JJJ • ACCESS CHAMBERS SHALL BEATWIN-WALL DESIGN WITH ATRANSVERSE m O o�d o VERTICAL RIB AND ASSEMBLED FROM STACKABLE 150mm DEEP SECTIONS. • ACCESS CHAMBERS MUST BE TESTED TO WITHSTAND A MINIMUM VERTICAL O1 LOAD OF 90 TONNES WITHOUT THE USE OF CONCRETE SURROUND FOR B .r 4x M12 $TAKKAbox Ultima CONNECT SUPPORT. B m LOCATION HOLES ACCESS CHAMBER • EXTERNAL WALLS SHALL BE SMOOTH WITH A KEY LIP TO ALLOW FULL S COMPACTION AGAINSTTHE CHAMBERAND KEY INTO BACKFILL MATERIAL. • EXTERNAL WALLS SHALL BE FREE FROM MOULDING VOIDS THAT WILL _•_ _ _ _ _ NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPACTION WHICH SHOULD BE - - - - - - - - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW ROADS AND STREET WORKS ACT (1991). • ACCESS CHAMBERS MUST NOT BE JOINTED IN THE CORNER OR REQUIRE MECHANICAL FIXING TO ACHIEVE STRENGTH. VERTICAL JOINTS WILL BE STAGGERED. • ACCESS CHAMBER SECTIONS MUST HAVE THE ABILITY TO BE ADJUSTED IN HEIGHT DURING INSTALLATION BY BEING CUT LATERALLY WITHOUT LOSS OF STRENGTH TO ALLOW FOR TRANSITIONAL GRADIENT INSTALLATIONS. • ACCESS CHAMBERS WILLALLOWDUCT ENTRIES TOBEQUICKLY FORMED ON SITE. EXPLODED VIEW • ACCESS CHAMBERS MUST HAVE SMOOTH INTERNAL WALLS TO ALLOW C B (CABINET OMITTED FOR CLARITY) CHAMBER FURNITURE TO BE FITTED. C • ANY SIZE CHAMBER CAN BE MADE IN 100mm INTERVALS PLAN VIEW ELEVATION • TWIN WALL ACCESS CHAMBERS TO BE SUPPLIED TO THE ABOVE SPECIFICATION BY NAL LTD OR EQUALLY APPROVED MANUFACTURER. m w Z o m 1145 CABINET BASE FRAME GL 1545 CABINET BASE FRAME G ROU ND m V LEVEL I D x 18 TYP 4 POS'NS D = FRAME TO BE BOLTED THRU IT I z m STAKKAbox ACCESS CHAMBER n Q u Q 1000 ACCESS CHAMBER 1400 ACCESS CHAMBER CLEAR OPENING CLEAR OPENING E SECTION A -A SECTION B-B E (CABINET OMITTED FOR CLARITY) (CABINET OMITTED FOR CLARITY) THIS DRAWING AND ANY INFORMATION OR DRAWN BY: DESCRIPTIVE MATERIAL SET OUT ON IT ARE THE CONFIDENTIAL BAW AND COPYRIGHT PROPERTY OF ULSCRIPTION: MATERIAL: CABI N ET BASE SYSTE M-U NCOLN ELECTRIC SI NGLE CABI N ET(451NCH) See BOM NAL LTD AND MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED, COPIED, LO NEDINW SE FORANYNAL FINISH. PER ISSISED WRITTEN DRAWN DATE: WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF NAL LTD. WITHOUT LTD. PART NUMBER: 06/02/2023 AS SUPPLIED COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTTYPE: CHECKED/APPR'D BY: DRAWING No: SHEET: REV: UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED: ACRHCOMPANY GENERALASSEMBLY 8000-1017 112f1 A . UNEARTOL:-_ 2 F NAL Ltd, Weir Lane, Worcester, WR24AY ANGUTARTOL:0%S' F Te1:01905427300 PROJECTION METHOD: SHEETS E: • SURFACE FINISH: OJ4,. THIRD ANGIE CHECKED/APPR'D DATE: APPROX WEIGHT: DRAWING SCALE: DRAWING IN ACCORDANCE WITH: A FIRST ISSUE 06�03�2023 RC e-mail.sale@nal.ltd.uk � .R 858888 Kg 1�20 ww 2I.Hd.uk ALL DIMENSIONS: mm(METRIC) DEBURRTOREMOVE ALL SHARP EDGES R0.3MAX REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED 1 1 2 T 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 GFCI-15112OV., GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER, DUPLEX RECEPTACLE, WITH USB-A & USB-C CHARGING PORTS. HCM -HYGROSTAT IMFR: STEGO CAT. # EFR-012] HTR -FINNED STRIP HEATER 250W @ 120V. IMFR: VULCAN CAT. #OSF131G-250A] MCI -MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER PSU -24VDC POWER SUPPLY UNIT IMFR: MEANWELL 12OW. DC [CAT. # SDR-120-24] 78rG -TERMINAL BLOCK GROUND -TERMINAL BLOCK LINE TBM -TERMINAL BLOCK NEUTRAL ® -V3 SITE CONTROLLER COMPUTER (CATC IC0300) (24VDC) CONTROLS EV-2 Xx/)odJ000l 6 OF 6 EV CHARGING STATION COMPARTMENT CITY, STATE SHORT CIRCUIT RATING VCLTAGE AMPERAGE SYSTEM BUSMATERIAL ENCLOSURE REV DRAWINGNUMBER 65kA. SYM. RMS 480Y/277V AC 2000A 31p, 4W COPPER TYPE-3R 0 XxxxxSB01 OWL4 I Mobility I hereby Certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Signature: Name: Phillip J Jaminet Date: License Number. 62439 W F G Ci Z DATE 0 J J W N Uwe ZLr) 0 Z [ 0 �00 W ti Q U_ N 0 �_ Y O Z LI U 0. , IJ 4/2/2024 TITLE SWITCHGEAR CUT SHEETS NUMBER E-6 PAGE NUMBER 12 OF 13 POWER AND SIGNAL DEVICE LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS A, AMP AMPERE EMT ELECTRICAL METAL TUBING N NEUTRAL SYMBOL DESCRIPTION ADA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT FACP FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL NC NORMALLY CLOSED N&M UON, 20A, 125V, 2P, 3W, GROUNDED WALL MOUNTED DUPLEX AND DOUBLE DUPLEX RECEPTACLES, NEMA 5-20R. AF AMPERE FRAME FBO FURNISH BY OTHER DIVISION OF WORK NO NUMBER (COLOR PER ARCHITECT). ALL OUTLETS SHALL BE LABELED AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR FCO FUSE CUTOUT BOX NTS NOT TO SCALE WITH ITS SOURCE PANEL AND BREAKER # ID. "WP" AHJ AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION FCS FIRE COMMAND STATION OL OVERLOAD DEVICE - INDICATES WEATHERPROOF (TYP FOR WIRING r DEVICES) AIC AMPS INTERRUPTING CAPACITY FSD FIRE SMOKE DAMPER P POLE OWL4 "C" - INDICATES COUNTER HEIGHT (TYP FOR WIRING AT AMPERE TRIP FU FUSE PNL PANEL Mobility DEVICES) ATS AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH FL FLOOR 0 PHASE SHADING FOR DUPLEX OR DOUBLE DUPLEX PER ABOVE AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE FLEX FLEXIBLE RA RETURN AIR INDICATES DEDICATED CIRCUIT UON, 20A, 125V, 2P, 3W, GROUNDED WALL MOUNTED BLDG BUILDING FT FEET OR FOOT RG, RAG RETURN AIR GRILLE DUPLEX AND DOUBLE DUPLEX RECEPTACLES WITH GROUND BMS BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GA GAUGE SN SOLID NEUTRAL I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report was prepared ma or undea my direct supervision FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER, NEMA 5-20R. WEATHER PROOF and and that I am a duly Licensed (COLOR PER ARCHITECT). ALL OUTLETS SHALL BE LABELED C CONDUIT G, GRD GROUND SPCP STAIR PRESSURIZATION SYSTEM Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota WITH ITS SOURCE PANEL AND BREAKER # ID. CAT CATALOG GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTROL PANEL Signature: 4 ► / , '''++TM"""""'""""""''"^'�77777 j/'/ ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX FOR HARDWIRED EQUIPMENT. Name: Phillip J Jaminet CB CIRCUIT BREAKER GFI GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER STP STAIR PRESSURIZATION Date: (2) INDICATES DOUBLE —GANG BOX. CD CANDELA HID HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE SW SWITCH License Number. 62439 O (F) INDICATES FLOOR RECESSED. CFSD COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER HP HORSEPOWER SWBD SWITCHBOARD (CE) INDICATES CEILING RECESSED. (AFC) INDICATES ABOVE FINISHED CEILING, SURFACE MTD. CKT CIRCUIT HVAC HEATING, VENTILATING & TEL TELEPHONE SURFACE MOUNTED PANELBOARD — SOLID INDICATES NEW, CLG CEILING AIR CONDITIONING TYP TYPICAL c UNSHADED DASHED INDICATES EXISTING / CO CONDUIT ONLY HZ HERTZ UON UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED DRY TYPE TRANSFORMER — SIZE AS INDICATED ON THE CU COPPER IC INTERRUPTING CAPACITY UL UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES ❑T DRAWINGS ELECTRICAL METER OR SUB —METER AS IDENTIFIED ON THE DACS DIGITAL ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM JB JUNCTION BOX UV ULTRAVIOLET DRAWINGS DACT DIGITAL ALARM COMMUNICATION TERMINAL LEMCS LOCAL EMERGENCY CONTROL SYSTEM VESDA VERY EARLY SMOKE DETECTION 0 1 CKT PNL-(#) ONE, TWO, OR THREE HOME RUNS TO ELECTRICAL PANEL DGP DATA GATHERING PANEL LTG LIGHTING APPARATUS J J 2 CKT PNL-(#),(#) PNL' — INDICATED PANEL NAME DIFF DIFFERENTIAL MCB MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER V VOLTAGE U 3 CKT PNL-(#),(#),(# # — INDICATES CIRCUIT NUMBER, U.O.N. W CM DISC DISCONNECT MECH MECHANICAL VDC DIRECT CURRENT VOLTAGE • LO L: �G23 IGROUND BAR DN DOWN 0 MER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM VFD VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE Q Z Z DWG DRAWING MIN MINIMUM WP WEATHER PROOF 0 2i ELEC ELECTRICAL MLO MAIN LUGS ONLY 0 0 EMR ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM MTD MOUNTED � � J �Se W ti Q U cal 0 _ � oZ LI J 75 U U W F Q G O Z DATE 4/2/2024 SHEET TITLE ELECTRICAL GENERALNOTES NUMBER E-7 PAGE NUMBER 13 OF 13 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 2D. Public Hearing - Consideration of an Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for a Restaurant with Drive-thru in a B-4, Regional Business zoning district. Applicant: Westwood Professional Services o/b/o CA Commercial Development (Panera) Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Grittman Consulting, Stephen 05/07/2024 Commission action): Grittman, City Planner 05/28/2024 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Chief Building and Zoning Official, Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Project Engineer ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Consideration of an amendment to an existing Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development for a Restaurant with drive-thru facilities. 1. Motion to recommend approval of the amended CUP/PUD for Restaurant with Drive- thru facilities based on findings in Resolution No. PC-2024-15 and subject to the Conditions of Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to recommend denial of the amended CUP/PUD for Restaurant Drive-thru facilities based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table, subject to additional information from staff or applicant. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, Union Crossings 2nd Addition PID #: 155-205-001020 Planning Case Number: 2024-18 Request(s): Amended CUP/PUD for a Restaurant with Drive -Through Deadline for Decision: June 10, 2024 (60-day deadline) August 8, 2024 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: Regional Commercial Zoning Designation: B-4, Regional Business Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District, MSWRR (portion) 1 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 Current Site Uses Surrounding Land Uses Project Description: ANALYSIS Vacant Commercial North: Mixed Retail/Service East: Commercial Retail South: 1-94 West: Mixed Commercial The applicant proposes to develop a parcel in the Union Crossings retail Planned Unit Development as a restaurant with drive-thru facilities. The site is an existing vacant parcel just under one -acre in area. The property includes a potential shared drive along the east boundary, but the applicant proposes to not make use of that drive. Instead, access and egress will be provided via an internal private street on the north side of the property in question. Zoning. The subject site is zoned B-4, Regional Business. Restaurants are a permitted use in the B-4 zoning district. Drive-thru facilities require a Conditional Use Permit. The subject property is a part of the larger Union Crossings Planned Unit Development, originally created by Conditional Use Permit PUD. As such, the development of this parcel requires the requested amendment to that CUP/PUD; the approved development and final stage plans for the Union Crossing anticipated restaurant development of the parcel consistent with the proposal. Site Design. The project consists of a 2,400-square-foot building, with a patio seating area to the south of the building. Traffic enters the site from the sole access point on the north and circulates around the building in a counter -clockwise direction. Parking spaces are arrayed on both the west and east sides of the building and drive aisle. To access the drive-thru, traffic continues around the building to the northeast corner where it is separated from the circulation aisle. A preorder board is located at the entrance to the exclusive drive-thru lane, and a menu/order board at the northwest corner of the building. The pick-up window is located along the west side of the building. Exiting traffic would then continue around the building to leave the site at the north driveway. In conversations with staff, the applicants have developed an updated site plan that shows the requirement minimum of 8 stacking lane spaces, although they indicate that the restaurant model expects to serve a lower number based on other similar facilities. The applicants have provided a parking analysis based on the City's requirements indicating a total of 32 parking spaces, equal to the minimum ordinance standard. Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 A raised curbed median is included that separates a portion of the drive-thru lane from incoming traffic. The initial design showed just six drive-thru spaces in the queue. The median design could permit incoming traffic to jump the queue, avoiding the full encircling of the building and entering the outgoing one-way traffic lane. Staff would suggest that the median be extended another 20 feet to discourage that possibility. Other Elements. Other aspects of the site use are discussed separately below. Landscaping. The site is attractively landscaped. While the trash enclosure is located apart from the building in the northeast corner of the site, there are few other options on this parcel size, given the exposure to surrounding roadways. The applicants have provided an extensive evergreen (Arborvitae) screen of the enclosure that should still permit visibility for north -bound traffic using the private road that abuts this parcel on the east. That corner landscape includes perennial grasses and overstory trees (Swamp White Oak) in support of the evergreens. One recommended change to the landscape plan would be a row of small ornamental trees in the narrow space between the adjoining driveway and the east rank of parking spaces. That area is just 5 feet in width between curblines and is shown only as turf grass. Small trees in mulch would be easier to maintain and rely on the survival of the plant materials than would turf. Building Materials. The application package includes a preliminary set of architectural drawings of all four sides of the building. The building is made up of brick, EIFS, architectural metal cladding, and glass. Staff has asked that the exterior mechanical equipment and other components (such as the ladder) are painted to match the dominant wall material colors. That noted, the north side of the building includes an extensive landscape planting that will help filter any views of the "rear' side of the building. The trash enclosure is covered with the same brick as is proposed for the building. Signage. The applicants have not detailed on -site signage for commercial or directional purposes. The Union Crossings PUD requires that this parcel not have separate freestanding signage, and that space on the common monument sign located on the property to the east (shared with Mattress Firm) is the only available ground signage. The applicant is permitted, and encouraged, to utilize wall signage to notify traffic of the restaurant and its access points. Any signage will need to meet the City's sign ordinance requirements and be subject to separate permitting. Lighting. The applicants have included a lighting plan with the CUP package. There is some limited light spread onto adjoining roadways, which are also subject to neighboring property lighting and street lighting in the area. None of the off -site spread Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 exceeds the City's maximum of 1.0 footcandles in commercial areas. The plan shows pole lighting to be at the maximum of 25 feet in height. All such lighting is required to be downcast and hooded to avoid direct glare and view of the light source. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Approval of a conditional use permit application (including amendments) requires that the City find that conditions can be established to ensure that all the following criteria will always be met: (i) The conditional use will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Staff Comment: As an allowed use in the district, and with the conditions identified, there is no reason to believe that there will be any negative impacts on neighboring property values. (ii) The conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working near the use. Staff Comment: The site is contained and meets the general standards of the zoning ordinance and the governing PUD for Union Crossings. No detrimental impacts are foreseen. (iii) The conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property for permitted uses predominant in the area. Staff Comment: The site is the last of the outlots in this portion of the Union Crossings area to be developed and will not cause use or operations issues for other property. (iv) The conditional use will not pose an undue burden on public utilities or roads, and adequate sanitary facilities are provided. Staff Comment: The site is an allowed use and its utility impacts are included in the City's planning for the Regional Commercial district. (v) The conditional use can provide adequate parking and loading spaces, and all storage on the site can be done in conformance with City Code requirements. Staff Comment: Adequate parking is provided per code, and the updates to the site plan accommodate the City's requirements for drive-thru stacking. Additional stacking would impact internal site use only, and no threat to public streets is foreseen. (vi) The conditional use will not result in any nuisance including but not limited to odor, noise, or sight pollution. Staff Comment: The project complies with the requirements of the code and should not create nuisances. 4 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 (vii) The conditional use will not unnecessarily impact natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, and shorelines; and all erosion will be properly controlled. Staff Comment: No impacts to any natural features are expected with this project. (viii) The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined in the Zoning Ordinance for the proposed use. Staff Comment: The applicants have designed the site, and updated plans per preliminary staff comments, to illustrate compliance with the requirements and intent of the zoning ordinance. With the remaining notes found in Exhibit Z of the staff report, the project is consistent with zoning standards. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the CUP/PUD amendment with the Conditions listed in Exhibit Z. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2024-15 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Site Plan Based on the Certificate of Survey E. Civil Plan Set, Dated April 25, 2024 F. Architectural Plan Set, Dated April 2, 2024 G. Union Crossings Overall Site Plan, Dated April 14, 2005 H. Union Crossings Sign Plan I. Engineer's Comment Letter, Dated April 30, 2024 Z. Conditions of Approval 5 Planning Commission Agenda - 05/07/2024 EXHIBIT Z CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU IN THE B-4 DISTRICT LOT 2, BLOCK 1, UNION CROSSINGS 2ND ADDITION PI D: 155-205-001020 The plans are revised to add a row of small trees or shrubs in the planting boundary along the east side of the property. 2. Extend the median separating the drive-thru lane to discourage entering traffic from creating conflicts with circulating traffic. 3. The project is constructed per the plans provided, with incorporation of the recommendations made by the Planning Commission and the staff report. 4. The applicants paint exterior mechanical and related components (particularly on the north side of the building) to match the base wall material colors. 5. Signage and other components related to the project meet all requirements of the Union Crossing Planned Unit Development and zoning requirements as applicable and are subject to permitting as required. 6. Comments of the City Engineer per letter dated April 30, 2024 7. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. C.1 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-15 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU IN A B-4, REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LEGAL: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, UNION CROSSINGS 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to amend an existing Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to establish a restaurant with drive-thru on a vacant parcel; and WHEREAS, the approved PUD anticipates a variety of commercial uses, including dining establishments; and WHEREAS, the proposed use would have impacts on the site and PUD that were planned for as a part of the original PUD approval; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Regional Business (B-4), which allows drive-thru facilities as an accessory use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the use would continue to be consistent with the long-term land use plan for the City and the location, including the designation of the site for "Regional Commercial" uses; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting that the proposed use facilitate long-term use of the site and PUD for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting that the proposed use will comply with the terms and standards of the zoning ordinance with the recommendations approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 7t", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-15 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed facility will be in compliance with the standards for drive -through restaurant facilities found in the zoning ordinance and original PUD approvals. 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the use will improve long- term use of the site for commercial uses. 3. The proposed facility is not expected to create traffic impacts for adjoining public and private roadways in the area. 4. The operation of the business will not create noise, odors, visual impacts, or other noticeable impacts on the property or the neighborhood beyond those expected for allowed uses in the zoning district. 5. The use will improve convenience to customers and to the public, consistent with the City's economic development objectives for commercial property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for PUD for drive -through facilities, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: 1. The plans are revised to add a row of small trees or shrubs in the planting boundary along the east side of the property. 2. Extend the median separating the drive-thru lane to discourage entering traffic from creating conflicts with circulating traffic. 3. The project is constructed per the plans provided, with incorporation of the recommendations made by the Planning Commission and the staff report. 4. The applicants paint exterior mechanical and related components (particularly on the north side of the building) to match the base wall material colors. 5. Signage and other components related to the project meet all requirements of the Union Crossing Planned Unit Development and zoning requirements as applicable and are subject to permitting as required. 6. Comments of the City Engineer per letter dated April 30, 2024. 7. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and the Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION In Paul Konsor, Chair 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-15 ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Consideration of an Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Legal: Lot 2, Block 1, Union Crossings 2nd Addition; PID: 155-205-001020 Created by: City of Monticello Westwood MEMORANDUM Date: April 8, 2024 Re: Monticello Panera Development File 0045058.00 To: Community Development From: Adam Wangsness 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 main (952)937-5150 fax (952)937-5822 CA Commercial Development is pleased to present the attached materials in support of a Land Use Application for a proposed Panera Bread restaurant located at the northwest corner of E .7th St and Fenning Ave in Monticello, MN. As a part of the development, a driveway will be constructed to connect the proposed parking lot to the existing access drives for the Target development. The proposed building is approximately 2,400 square feet, with 28 standard parking spaces, 2 ADA parking spaces, 3 mobile order pickup spaces, and 6 vehicle stacking spaces. The 6 standard stalls at the northwest corner of the proposed parking lot will be used for employee parking. Following entitlement approvals and property acquisition, we anticipate an immediate start to construction, with the goal of opening in late 2024. westwood ps.conn TBPLS Firm No. 10074302 (888) 937-5150 SITE INFORMATION N/F. RCG-MONTCELLO OP LLC, A GEORGIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LOT 2, BLOCK 1, UNION CROSSINGS SECOND ADDITION LOCATED IN: SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 121 NORTH, RANGE 25 WEST APN: 155205001020 40,602 ± SQUARE FEET, OR 0.932 ± ACRES TITLE COMMITMENT INFORMATION THE PROPERTY HEREON DESCRIBED IS THE SAME PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TITLE COMMITMENT #NCS-1167167A-ATL, DATED JANUARY 30, 2024 AT 7:30 AM. SCHEDULE A DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, COUNTY OF WRIGHT, STATE OF MINNESOTA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, UNION CROSSINGS SECOND ADDITION, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. (TORRENS PROPERTY, CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 8305.0) PARKING INFORMATION NO STRIPED PARKING OBSERVED AT THE TIME OF ALTA/NSPS SURVEY. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY, THIS PROPERTY IS IN ZONE "X" OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 2705410005B, WHICH BEARS AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1110111979 AND IS NOT IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA. ZONE 'X" - AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD, USUALLY DEPICTED ON FIRMS AS ABOVE THE 500-YEAR FLOOD LEVEL. ZONE 'X" IS THE AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500-YEAR FLOOD AND PROTECTED BY LEVEE FROM 100-YEAR FLOOD. BASIS OF BEARING THE BASIS OF BEARING OF THIS SURVEY IS GRID NORTH BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE BEARING IS DENOTED AS S 11 °43'51 " W PER GPS COORDINATE OBSERVATIONS MINNESOTA STATE PLANE, SOUTH ZONE NAD83. LATITUDE = 45'1734.7738" LONGITUDE =-93°46'18.3008" CONVERGENCE ANGLE = 00°09'35.9518" UTILITY INFORMATION THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HEREON HAVE BEEN LOCATED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS UTILITY MAP DRAWINGS, PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATE PERFORMED BY BLEW & ASSOCIATES ON FEBRUARY 5 2024 AND MINNESOTA 811 DIG UTILITY LOCATE REQUEST. BLEW AND ASSOCIATES MAKES NO WARRANTY TO THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TICKET NUMBER: 240170972 COMPANY: CONTACT: AT&T TRANSMISSION 866-460-6324 TDS TELECOM 763-682-3514 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 800-778-9140 FIBERNET 763-314-0113 MONTICELLO SANITARY SEWER 763-295-3170 CENTER POINT ENERGY 608-223-2014 MNDOT 651-366-5750 MONTICELLO SCHOOL DIST 882 763-238-6009 TDS METROCOM 763-682-3514 XCEL ENERGY 800-848-7558 ZONING INFORMATION PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED: AWAITING ZONING REPORT ITEM REQUIRED OBSERVED PERMITTED USE VACANT LAND MIN. SETBACKS FRONT N/A MIN. SETBACKS SIDE N/A MIN. SETBACKS REAR N/A MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT N/A MIN. LOT AREA 40,602 SQ. FEET± MIN. LOT WIDTH 33.16' MAX. BLDG COVERAGE N/A PARKING REGULAR N/A PARKING HANDICAP N/A PARKING TOTAL N/A PARKING INFORMATION: SIGNIFICANT OBSERVATIONS A _ UNDERGROUND TELEVISION LINE APPEARS TO EXTEND OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT AREA DESCRIBED IN DOC NOS. 23745 & 25683 BYAS MUCH AS 21.6'. 0 - UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE APPEARS TO EXTEND OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT AREA DESCRIBED IN DOC NOS. 23745 & 25683 BYAS MUCH AS 8.4'. _ UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE APPEARS TO EXTEND OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT C AREA DESCRIBED IN DOC NOS. 23745 & 25683 BYAS MUCH AS 9.9'. 0 - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE APPEARS TO EXTEND OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT AREA DESCRIBED IN DOC NOS. 23745 & 25683 BYAS MUCH AS 6.01. 0 - UNDERGROUND STORM DRAINAGE LINE APPEARS TO EXTEND INTO SUBJECT PROPERTY BYAS MUCH AS 27.6' WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF AN EASEMENT. NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B 12 - UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF UNION CROSSINGS RECORDED JULY 29, 2005, AS DOCUMENT NO. 23745. (AFFECTS, PLOTTED AS SHOWN) 13 - TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, BETWEEN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, A MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND RYAN COMPANIES US, INC., A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, DATED JULY 5, 2005, RECORDED JULY 29, 2005, AS DOCUMENT NO. T23746, AS AMENDED BY THE AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, DATED MAY 22, 2014, RECORDED JUNE 26, 2014, AS DOCUMENT NO. T30529. (AFFECTS, BLANKET IN NATURE) 14 - TERMS AND CONDITIONS, INCLUDING EASEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS, AS CONTAINED IN THE FOLLOWING OPERATION AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS: - OPERATION AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT, BETWEEN TARGET CORPORATION, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., A DELA WARE CORPORATION, AND RYAN COMPANIES US, INC., A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, DATED JULY 5, 2005, RECORDED JULY 29, 2005, AS DOCUMENT NO. T23751; (AFFECTS, APPROXIMATE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON) 146 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO OPERATION AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT, DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2007, RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 2007, AS DOCUMENT NO. T26013; (AFFECTS, APPROXIMATE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON) 14 - SECOND AMENDMENT TO OPERATION AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT, DATED JUNE 5, 2008, RECORDED JULY 28, 2008, AS DOCUMENT NO. T26476; (AFFECTS, APPROXIMATE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON) 4D - DECLARATION OF ALLOCATION OF COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE COSTS AND ADMINISTRATION FEE, DATED MAY 31, 2011, RECORDED JUNE 21, 2011, AS DOCUMENT NO. T28434; (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) 14E - DECLARATION OF ALLOCATION OF COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE COSTS AND ADMINISTRATION FEE, DATED MAY 31, 2011, RECORDED JUNE 21, 2011, AS DOCUMENT NO. T28435; (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) 14F - ASSIGNMENT OF APPROVING PARTY STATUS, FROM RYAN COMPANIES US, INC., TO AX TC RETAIL L.P., DATED DECEMBER 31, 2014, RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 2015, AS DOCUMENT NO. T31168; (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) - THIRD AMENDMENT TO OPERATION AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT, DATED JULY 24, 2015, RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 2015, AS DOCUMENT NO. T31169. (AFFECTS, APPROXIMATE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON) - ASSIGNMENT OF APPROVING PARTY STATUS, FROM AX TC RETAIL L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO RCG-MONTICELLO MN, LLC, A GEORGIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DATED DECEMBER 19, 2019, RECORDED JANUARY 30, 2020, AS DOCUMENT NO. T33857. (DOES NOT AFFECT, AFFECTS LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF UNION CROSSINGS SECOND ADDITION) DECLARATION OF ALLOCATION OF COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE COSTS AND 41 - ADMINISTRATION FEE, DATED DECEMBER 31, 2014, RECORDED JANUARY 23, 2015, AS DOCUMENT NO. T30827. (DOES NOT AFFECT, AFFECTS LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1 OF UNION CROSSINGS SIXTH ADDITION) O- EASEMENT FOR SIDEWALK PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, A 15 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AS CONTAINED IN THE EASEMENT, DATED MARCH 23, 2006, RECORDED MAY 11, 2006, AS DOCUMENT NO. T24626. (AFFECTS, PLOTTED AS SHOWN) 16 - UTILITYAND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF UNION CROSSINGS SECOND ADDITION RECORDED JUNE 25, 2007, AS DOCUMENT NO. 25683. (AFFECTS, PLOTTED AS SHOWN) 17 - TERM AND CONDITIONS, INCLUDING USE RESTRICTIONS, AS CONTAINED IN THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, DATED NOVEMBER 21, 2007, RECORDED JANUARY 23, 2008, AS DOCUMENT NO. T26083. (AFFECTS, BLANKET IN NATURE) 18 - TERMS AND CONDITIONS, INCLUDING USE RESTRICTIONS, AS CONTAINED IN THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, DATED MARCH 25, 2008, RECORDED APRIL 18, 2008, AS DOCUMENT NO. T26295. (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) 19 - TERMS AND CONDITIONS, INCLUDING USE RESTRICTIONS, AS CONTAINED IN THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND PROHIBITED USES, DATED DECEMBER 31, 2014, RECORDED JANUARY 23, 2015, AS DOCUMENT NO. T30826. (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) 20 - SUBJECT TO A LIMITATION OF RIGHT OF ACCESS TO INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94 AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 266152, AND BY FINAL CERTIFICATE RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 287159 SHOWN AS A RECITAL ON THE CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. (AFFECTS, BLANKET IN NATURE) 21 - CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN ORDER # 07-033 GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 2008, AS DOCUMENT NO. T26736. (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) 22 - TERMS AND CONDITIONS, INCLUDING USE RESTRICTIONS, AS CONTAINED IN RESTRICTIVE COVENANT, DATED APRIL 2, 2008, RECORDED JULY 28, 2008, AS DOCUMENT NO. T26477. (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) O- MORTGAGE, ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND LEASES AND SECURITY AGREEMENT 23 EXECUTED BY RCG-MONTICELLO MN, LLC, A GEORGIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO CIBC BANK USA, AN ILLINOIS STATE CHARTERED BANK, DATED DECEMBER 19, 2019, RECORDED JANUARY 30, 2020, AS DOCUMENT NO. T33858, SECURING THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT OF $26,426,250.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS WHICH MAY BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF. (COVERS ADDITIONAL LAND) ABOVE MORTGAGE, ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND LEASES AND SECURITY AGREEMENT WAS MODIFIED BY MODIFICATION OF MORTGAGE, ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND LEASES AND SECURITY AGREEMENT, DATED JANUARY 20, 2023, RECORDED FEBRUARY 7, 2023, AS DOCUMENT NO. T36560. (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) 24 - ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES, RENTS AND PROFITS EXECUTED BY RCG-MONTICELLO MN, LLC, A GEORGIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS ASSIGNOR, TO CIBC BANK USA, AN ILLINOIS STATE CHARTERED BANK ASSIGNEE, DATED DECEMBER 19, 2019, RECORDED JANUARY 30, 2020 AS DOCUMENT NO. T33859. (COVERS ADDITIONAL LAND) ABOVE ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES, RENTS AND PROFITS WAS MODIFIED BY MODIFICATION OF ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES, RENTS AND PROFITS, DATED JANUARY 20, 2023, RECORDED FEBRUARY 7, 2023, AS DOCUMENT NO. T36561. (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) 25 - A FINANCING STATEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 30, 2020, AS DOCUMENT NO. T33860, BETWEEN RCG MONTICELLO MN, LLC, DEBTOR, AND CIBC BANK USA, SECURED PARTY. (COVERS ADDITIONAL LAND) AMENDED BY UCC FINANCING STATEMENT AMENDMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 7, 2023, AS DOCUMENT NO. T36562. (AFFECTS, CONTAINS NO PLOTTABLE EASEMENT ITEMS) 26 - TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AND EASEMENTS AS CONTAINED IN DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 13, 2023, RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 2023, AS DOCUMENT NO. T37089. (AFFECTS, BLANKET IN NATURE) ALTAINSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY GENERAL NOTES L O T Z. BLOCK 1, UNION CROSSINGS SECOND ADDI TIOIV 1. SOME FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT MAYBE SHOWN OUT OF SCALE FOR CLARITY. LOCATED IN: SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 121 NORTH, RANGE 25 WEST w ` 2. DIMENSIONS THIS PLAT ARE EXPRESSED IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF E UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MONUMENTS WERE FOUND AT POINTS WHERE INDICATED. MONTICELLO. WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA 55362 / 3. IN REGARD TO ALTA/NSPS TABLE ITEM 16, THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 4. IN REGARD TO ALTA/NSPS TABLE A ITEM 17, THERE WERE NO KNOWN PROPOSED S CHANGES IN RIGHT OF WAY LINES, RECENT STREET OR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION OR INVERT INFORMATION REPAIRS EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. SCALE: 1" = 30' GRAPHIC SCALE 5. AT THE TIME OF THE ALTA/NSPS SURVEY, THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF SEWER MANHOLES CURB INLETS CURB INLETS CURB INLETS SITE USE AS A SOLID WASTE DUMP, SUMP, OR SANITARY LANDFILL. SMH-1 CI-1 CI-6 CI-12 TEMPORARY 0 15' 30' 60' 6. AT THE TIME OF THE ALTA/NSPS SURVEY, THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF RIM ELEVATION: 957.52' RIM ELEVATION: 955.62' RIM ELEVATION: 962.09' RIM ELEVATION: 960.32' SITE USE AS A CEMETERY, ISOLATED GRAVE SITE OR BURIAL GROUNDS. INVERT N (6" PVC): 942. V INVERT N (12" HDPE): 951.6' INVERT NW (24" RCP): 949.6' INVERT NW (36" HDPE): 943.3' BENCHMARK INFORMATION INVERT N (DROP PIPE - INVERT SE (15" HDPE): 951.5' INVERTS (24" RCP): 949.6' INVERT E (12" HDPE): 952.9' 7. COMPLETED FIELD WORK WAS FEBRUARY 06, 2024. NO FLOW) (6" PVC): 946.3' INVERT SE (36" HDPE): 943.1' TBM-1 INVERT E (6" PVC): 941.8' CI-2 CI-7 TYPE: SET 5/8" CAPPED REBAR "CONTROL" 8. THE DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE UNITS OF GROUND MEASUREMENT. INVERTS (PLUGGED - RIM ELEVATION: 955.89' RIM ELEVATION: 962.62' CI-13 NORTHING: 1164082.24 NO FLOW) (6" PVC): 942.0' INVERT NW (15" HDPE): 951.0' INVERT NE (24" RCP): 948.8' RIM ELEVATION: 960.26' EASTING: 2683410.34 9. THE NEAREST INTERSECTING STREET IS THE INTERSECTION OF EAST 7TH STREET AND INVERT S (DROP PIPE - INVERT S (24" HDPE): 950.4' INVERTS (24" RCP): 948.8' INVERT W (12" HDPE): 956.6' ELEVATION: 957.09' FENNING AVENUE, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 210' FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NO FLOW) (6" PVC): 947.2' INVERT NE (15" HDPE): 950.9' THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. INVERT W (6" PVC): 941.7' CI-8 CI-14 TBM-2 CI-3 RIM ELEVATION: 955.29 RIM ELEVATION: 960.93' TYPE: SET 5/8" CAPPED REBAR "CONTROL" 10. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS INDIRECT ACCESS VIA A PERMANENT ACCESS DRIVE SMH-2 RIM ELEVATION: 956.29' INVERT NE (30" HDPE): 945.6' INVERT NW (36" RCP): 943. V NORTHING: 1164068.37 DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NOS. T23751, T26013, T26476 AND T31169 TO EAST 7TH RIM ELEVATION: 956.74' INVERT NE (24" RCP): 950. 1' INVERT NW (4" PVC): 950.4' INVERT S (36" RCP): 943.1' EASTING: 2683308.73 STREET, BEING A PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY. INVERT W (6" PVC): 947.0' INVERTS (24" RCP): 950. V INVERT SW (30" HDPE): 945.5' ELEVATION: 956.80' INVERTS (6" PVC): 947.0' CI-15 11. EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY STATED OR SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CI-4 CI-9 RIM ELEVATION: 961.43' CURVE TABLE PURPORT TO REFLECT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE SMH-3 RIM ELEVATION: 958.12' RIM ELEVATION: 955.93' INVERT N (36" RCP): 943.0' SUBJECT PROPERTY. EASEMENTS, OTHER THAN POSSIBLE EASEMENTS WHICH WERE RIM ELEVATION: 956.67' INVERT N (24" RCP): 950.0' INVERT NE (30" HDPE): 944.8' INVERT S (36" RCP): 942.9' VISIBLE AT THE TIME OF SURVEY; RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS; SUBDIVISION INVERT N (6" PVC): 947.3' INVERT SE (24" RCP): 950.0' INVERT NW (36" HDPE): 944.6' CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE RESTRICTIONS OR OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS; AND ANY OTHER FACTS WHICH AN INVERTS (6" PVC): 947.3' GRATED INLETS C1(M) 1300.00' 162.64' 162.53' N 83°05'27" W 7°10'05" ACCURATE TITLE SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE. CI-5 CI-10 CI(R) 1300.00' 162.64' N/A N84°33'13"W 7°10'06" RIM ELEVATION: 960.27' RIM ELEVATION: 956.00' GI-1 C2 M 115.00' 48.52' 48.16' N 24°45'01 " E 24°10'26" 12. NO SURVEYOR OR ANY OTHER PERSON OTHER THAN A LICENSED MINNESOTA INVERT NW (24" RCP): 949.7' INVERT SE (36" HDPE): 944.2' RIM ELEVATION: 956.11' C2(R) 115.00' 48.52' N/A N/A 24°10'31 " ATTORNEY MAY PROVIDE LEGAL ADVICE CONCERNING THE STATUS OF TITLE TO THE INVERT E (15" HDPE): 951.6' INVERT SW (36" HDPE): 944.1' INVERT N (24" RCP): 950.2' PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS SURVEY ("THE SUBJECT PROPERTY'). THE PURPOSE OF INVERT SE (24" RCP): 949.7' INVERT SW (24" RCP): 950. V C3(M) 1300.00' t 68.12' 68.11' S 88°10'34" E 3°00'08" THIS SURVEY, AND THE COMMENTS RELATED TO THE SCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTIONS, IS CI-11 ONLY TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF BOUNDARIES AND PHYSICAL OBJECTIONS IN RIM ELEVATION: 954.85' RELATION THERETO. TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SURVEY INDICATES THAT THE LEGAL INVERT NE (36" HDPE): 944.0' INSTRUMENT 'AFFECTS" THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, SUCH STATEMENT IS ONLY INTENDED INVERT E (15" HDPE): 945.4' TO INDICATE THAT PROPERTY BOUNDARIES INCLUDED IN SUCH INSTRUMENT INCLUDE INVERT SE (36" HDPE): 943.9' SOME OR ALL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE SURVEYOR DOES NOT PURPORT TO �<- DESCRIBE HOW SUCH INSTRUMENT AFFECTS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR THE eOc S.0, / ENFORCEABILITY OR LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH INSTRUMENT. c<ss �o9s�' Fc NG hh ^ P�h� 12 16 13. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS WERE TAKEN FROM ss"'' s�o• 'sss 9hh' WRIGHT COUNTY GIS. so 8 20' DRAINAGE AND Ss �' UTILITY EASEMENT \ FL:956.3' 3 \�11- yo 14. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON FORMS A MATHEMATICALLY CLOSED FIGURE c DOC NO. 23745; 16 e. ro 9 - - hh' `O• 'O<. DOC NO. 25683 AND IS CONTIGUOUS WITH THE ADJOINING PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYAND/OR ADJOINING ASPHALT x I o� ss DRAINAGE AND PARCELS WITH NO GAPS OR OVERLAPS. UTILITY EASEMENT � TA:956.4' �� 1 � O G 5 � DOC NO. 25683 15. IN REGARD TO ALTA/NSPS TABLE A ITEM 10 NO VISIBLE DIVISION OR PARTY WALLS WITH T \ / NG /�, N/F RCG-MONTICELLO MN LLC RESPECT TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES WERE OBSERVED AT THE TIME THE FIELD SURVEY O,� 6 TBM-1 yo y° 1523E 7TH ST WAS PERFORMED, NOR WERE ANY DESIGNATED BY THE CLIENT. �hh X MONTICELLO, MN 55362 ©� ss ss NG FOUND 1/2" CAPPED ,� TA:956.4' Sas _ 957'. ah� APN: 155205001010 16. A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATE WAS COMPLETED BY BLEW & ASSOCIATES ON FEBRUARY 5, REBAR "RLS 45873" i P h�'h^ SS 90 2024. _ Ss \ /CI-1 ss TBM-2 rA:s s.s' A ss pdM �yo �9p ss �?ysc�0 0hh' 16 9,p Q� 17. NO BUILDINGS OBSERVED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTYAT THE TIME OF SURVEY A S s X 6�• RAAND TGQ ss S 10.0'DINAGE O � CI-10 ss 9y6" o UTILITY EASEMENT SG �'1'G 18. ELEVATIONS ESTABLISHED WITH GPS STATIC OBSERVATIONS UTILIZING ONLINE / h6. \ NG DOC NO. 25683 ��F POSITIONING USER SERVICE (OPUS) FOR POST PROCESSING WITH ORIGINATING a � Y sse MH-3 o so BENCHMARK PID Q00993, VERTICAL DATUM BASED UPON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL /Jah ° - / s 4 \ o FOUND 1/2"CAPPED DATUM (NAVD88) IN US SURVEY FEET. CONTOURS SHOWN ARE AT ONE FOOT INTERVALS. \ s \ s BENCHMARK ID: Q00993 REBAR "RLS 45873" s Ste, s PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 957.34' CI-9 so o pp"'S. r F Ec 57 h�° MONUMENT DESCRIPTION: AZIMUTH MARK DISK SET IN TOP OF CONCRETE MONUMENT, NG:956.4' ass s6j,. o NG d STAMPED 'BAUER AZ MK 1963" 4 46 4 4 7h°13 � 1 hh0� G:956.4' 956.7 ,I ,9 ' p� 95 <GX�U h�. PERMANENT ACCESS DRIVE e° c;��� g°� �� Qoo / XNG:958.5' °� :gss.a' s\ w� - - , o o a APPROXIMATE LOCATION o ah �`L' r5 o�' XNG:956.5' / wL 7 : FL: `� ( ) 0v v ", , XN :957. �A9 6 956p, - DOC. NO. T23751; DOC NO. T26013; /� � N // "� s c� N78 2326 o2,�CI-2 POTENTIAL BLIND DOC NO. T26476; DOC NO. T31169 / ��WL h���/ o" / �S 1 NG:957. Fq\ 'y78 2042' W 3316 3 >6(MJ - -SAT ss 4 TRANSITION FROM °h xXNG:ASPHALT _ 9/4 NG:956.8' s_ HDPE TO RCP y0 / / h °h G 56.7' II 'o �S �iCT N/F TARGET CORPORATION NG:9 _ _XN6:957.1' m A s56. ^? /�� � - -957 �� 6 b FL:956.3' 1447E 7TH ST / �h� h� �h.ah o / XNG:95f>9' \ / NG �`C _ BOC:956.7' ss� ss V. h• / �,• U XNG:957.1' NG: 2'X N .956.6' rn Q � MONTICELLO, MN 55362 yo o ah/ �P' Quo / / XNG:957.2' cw �, ti GI-1 ss ss APN: 155178001010/ j k'? �� / I XNG:957.2' p NG:k7.0' CI-3 Sa ss ss 5° I XNG:957.1' 21.6' G 1 �( .957' SO NC/957. ' XNG:957.2' / NG.957.0 SMH-2 � so / XNG:957.5' s �a \ ING:957.5' FL:95.9'- XNG:956.9' v ^ o CI-11 �h�^. SET 5/8" CAPPED - - - xNGas7.o' x a NG REBAR "ROLLSTON/ a \ F� ss7 _ " /XNG:958.3' BFC9576' o MN LS 60382" C8 b �� W I 4 / 95. %/XNG:957.2' XNG:957.2' XNG:957.7' I /�Vy XNG:957.2' XNG:957.9' 7 ' hQ m / � a ASPHALT he /J XNG:957.2' N6958.1 X 1 I I Ql / BCC 9578, ^� G!957.9' XNG:957.5' 9581^ h s583 h� 4 U J XNG:957.7' 1 // XNG:958.0' mw 9?, ' o\ NG o tiQ Z QQ ab ` X NG:957. j NG:958.2'VX I / 14 NG m U G 958.3' \ X NG:958.3' W XNG:958.4' g58 - I N/F 7TH STREET EAST LLC a s X h O o X NG:958.4' �' b I NG:958.6��C I 0, _ (MAILING): 41 GLEN DR �o II O MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 m 4/ 959' - 4 0 N ^ ' I X NG:958.3' I j APN: 155205001030 / m o °wN ' V, W b a 1- _ _ _ NG.9958.5' Qi rn 1 (� 12 16 6' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DOC NO. 23745 DOC NO. 25683 SET MAG-NAIL WITH WASHER STAMPED "ERIC ROLLSTON MN 60382 7' CC T (j� t O G.959.2' I CI-4 ro � d. N m r � \s N/F RCG-MONTICELLO OP LLC XNG:959.1' � I ' l � 0 12 16 �^ �. w 5g LOT 2, BLOCK 1, UNION " �� 9 ^ _ ^ - XNG:959.4' CROSSINGS SECOND ADDITION NG:959.27 \ Q 6.0' DRAINAGE AND J � Z � � UTILITY EASEMENT J� xe � I I DOC NO. 25683 ° �o 1 rn 1 DOC NO. 23745; 60„ rn x 40, 602 SQ. FEET± h 2 a9 o NG:959.4' c Q v 9 x ti h w W I ti OVy DOC NO. 25683 o° N 6.932 ACRES± 7 h 4 0 C95 °G LO.1' \ APN: 155205001020\ CI-13 "' 4mo I XNG:960.2' \ \ NG NG:959 %, ui 0 / �� _ __-�/ XNG:960.4'7 �1 XNG:96o.1 ` _ J �g60'" o s mo r � o T 6NG N Qos', rngL1 XNG:960.2' , m- NEq- cl) CI-12 o X o N 960.8' XNG:960.8' / NG:961.5' ° co �V oto� XNG:960.7' NG:961.3' o (p �0 NG rn rn° s �gg1' X Q FL:96@9' m Jo. O1,, XNG:960.8'� NG:961.7'X ^ Ql 8 1.3' m4 4m I - / - - - - Qco NG:96 . c 961. X NG:961.4' B I ACCE O w so E 8.4, NG:962I0' CI 5 6� p53� i SS BO NG: 91, _ 6.0' 2 . FL.96a 1. 1 FOP � XNG:961.9' C I N XTA:960.6' F XNG:961.2' � 62. n� 10 c SO 'X�4: 0.9' oP - - -962'- - - ` 9 "? 4 om ASPHALT R/W 6�s � - - - - - NG NG:962.0- -I- �� I -- / _ --960' - X TA'960, EA: F G FOP EC.'960.4' _ o S SQ OP �S GAS T BT - BTL BTL Tt 9 STL BTL - P� � F es = B gw, : s 3" ss1 �9620�� FOUND 112" CAPPED ? �' s - EC 960.6' �P EC:96>. FO��gsNG:962.5' �--� Fbr--.:��s G�-ems G NG:96 GAS�� � oP REBAR "RLS 50319" _ _ T CC 0 4 EC:960.9' C C:9620 . EC.�962.2' EC:g 962.4' s 962' - gyp- - Bp�902, EA:960.7' ass 6'i EC:961.9�,- 60.6- XNG:961.6' EC:962. s o FL. BOO gs� �fT�:960.8' A:9 6' XN"64-9'\ X NG:962.1' EC:962.5' .6'_ R/W �s:.?• C3 1-6 _ TA:961.0' _ T 961` �6>_y 66> o m CI-14 NG:962.5' BOC:96> 8' - FL:961.3 80C9620' x NG:962.5' oc�9 s6 gyp, BOC:2.2.T FL:961.6' BOC: BOC:9 FLU 96 . ' FL:962.0' XTA:962.3' FL:962.2' TA:961.3' x o: 61 ' BOC.961.5' 0. _ i FOUND _ TA 9619' 1/2" REBAR - �� y FL: 61 961.9' - -,XTA:962.4' - TA: _962.6' C/L 15 FL:9618' - ,962 BOP 62.2' FL:962.1' yo CI-7 12.0' SIDEWALK EASEMENT FL:962.3' C:962.5' BOC:962.7' FL:962.4' BOC:962.9' FL:962.5' BOC:963.o' FL:962.8' BOC:963.3' DOC NO. T24626 o CI-15 " DATE 12 16 I EAST 7TH STREET 120' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0211512024 12' DRAINAGE AND h� (UNION CROSSINGS, SECOND ADDITION) UTILITY EASEMENT y VARIABLE WIDTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT DOC NO, 23745; DOC NO. 25683 N LEGEND & SYMBOLS TEMPORARY BENCHMARK (TBM) FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED O SET MONUMENT AS NOTED ® COMPUTED POINT T SIGN E LIGHT Q SANITARY MANHOLE (SMH) O FIBER OPTIC VAULT UTILITY VAULT ❑E ELECTRIC CABINET W FIRE HYDRANT m- WATER VALVE ❑® GRATED INLET (GI) ifi CURB INLET (CI) OD DRAINAGE MANHOLE (DMH) 0 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL NG NATURAL GROUND TC TOP OF CONCRETE EC EDGE OF CONCRETE EA EDGE OF ASPHALT TA TOP OF ASPHALT FL FLOWLINE BOC BACK OF CURB PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (M) MEASURED/CALCULATED DIMENSION (R) RECORD DIMENSION N/F NOW OR FORMERLY OVH OVERHANG BOUNDARY LINE - - EASEMENT LINE R/W - - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE C/L - CENTERLINE OF ROAD -x-x-x- FENCE LINE GAS UNDERGROUND GAS LINE - wL - wL - UNDERGROUND WATER LINE cTv UNDERGROUND TELEVISION LINE BTL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE FOP UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE uGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE - ss - ss - UNDERGROUND SEWER LINE - So so - UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE LINE - - - - - SETBACK LINE CONTINUATION SYMBOL SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE TO: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BYALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7B1, 7C, 8, 9, 10, 11 B, 13, 14, 16, 17, AND 19 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 0210612024. DATE OF PLAT OR MAP: 0210912024 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ERIC M. ROLLSTON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR 60382 STATE OF MINNESOTA VIINARY m 11 CD co Ln CD CD J 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 FOR PANERA BREAD MONTICELLO MONTICELLO, MN PREPARED FOR: CA COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 3805 EDWARDS RD, SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 CONTACT: MARL WILHOITE PHONE: 513-852-1231 EMAIL: MWILHOITE@COMPTONADDY.COM PREPARED BY: Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 CONTACT: SHARI AHRENS SHEET INDEX Sheet List Table SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C0.1 COVER C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C4.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.0 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN C5.1 STORM SEWER PLAN C6.0 CITY DETAILS C6.1 CIVIL DETAILS C7.0 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1-1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 8�o P`�elvie`N Pr __ aa� T ay e` h- rF c, Z C ei �F /y0' Mill Run y� SITE s ep� 07, hF m � O �o m � m v P"'Ple Heart Tri G,erse Fy w Vicinity Map (NOT TO SCALE) SOURCE.. GOOGLE MAPS NO. DATE REVISION SHEETS 04/11/2024 ISSUED FOR PERMIT ALL 1 04/25/2024 BULLETIN 1 C1.0, C2.0, C3.0, 1-1.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR PAN ERA BREAD MONTICELLO MONTICELLO, MN INITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 04/08/2024 0 J w 0 Q w Off Q w z Q VA PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 0 u 0 X LU 00 Ln 0 Ln 0 0 J u 0 00 Ln Ln 0 0 1 LEGEND Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance SANITARY MANHOLE — - - — BOUNDARY LINE sr STORM MANHOLE - - - EASEMENT LINE ® CATCH BASIN cry CABLE TELEVISION LINE x GATE VALVE GAS GAS LINE El ELECTRIC BOX PUG— POWER UNDERGROUND A STREET LIGHT SAN - SANITARY SEWER ❑T TELEPHONE BOX srO - STORM SEWER FIBER OPTIC PEDESTAL TUG TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ❑M MISCELLANEOUS PEDESTAL wnr— WATERMAIN SIGN FO - FIBER OPTIC CURB & GUTTER :. CONCRETE SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE --------------- SAW CUT PAVEMENT REMOVAL NOTES 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF EXISTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH AS FENCES, SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALL PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 5. SEE SURVEY PROVIDED BY BLEW ASSOCIATES FOR BOUNDARY AND BENCHMARK INFORMATION. 1"=20' 0' 20' 40' 60' CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Q O N Y N Y N N a U 6i N J J U Ln Z J z z O v U w 2 O w U 2 > F- � a cV oc O O00 z � o � w w O J � N N co m 0 N N 0 0 Ll C z� Ln rj z v v J O O O z as as Q� CD rn V Zw a, �o W 5Ln Ln W a o= elf O � � az LO LLI�U O(J z LU WQ 0 v Q V "' a w ry a � a aW � mg� del NT Wow aaz �:z z W Z O Z L/) W az U In W z ~ O J O N �"'wz O } W - O h \}� LU U w w H < W zJ W O W = J ~ = F- a =000 N o ap z W J Cal O V � H v W Z ~ z O o a2 7> a 0 m .3 W N > co �L V p m L � C Z GG � Z GV 3� L Y r O C C V) N V) N Ln Ln Lo C cimco O rnrnrn 'a rn rn co a� c O x LL CL U- Od V) zzQ —O�z 0 x�:� wz LU O U SHEET NUMBER: C 1,00 DATE: 04/25/2024 O J J w u z r� w Of m Q LU a PAI PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 0 u 0 a 00 0 Ln 0 0 J U 0 0 0 00 Ln Ln 0 0 PAI SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN 0 ° ''ARK/NG/LAND SCAPE BUFFER SAN k SITE LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED — — PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE — — — EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER - -------------- TIP -OUT CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Q NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS ❑T TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGN ® ! BOLLARD / POST Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance O N N w O a � U 6i V1 J H Ln Z z z O v U w 2 O w U 2 > H � a cV oc O O z \ 0 00 w w O D J � N N D m 0 N N 0 0 w (N un in Z v v J O O O Q Vl z � as as o rn V Zw a, �o W �r\j N� W ° 0 SITE DETAILS (SI-OXX) GENERAL SITE NOTES 2 a elf Ln O Qz LO LLJ U 1 B612 CURB AND GUTTER 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY BLEW &ASSOCIATES, O \ / z 8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK FAYETTEVILLE, AR, 02/15/2024. �Q WQ LU Ln G 9 PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP m 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS Q V 11 CROSS WALK STRIPING PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY 0- 13 TRAFFIC ARROW LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE LU 15 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 16 PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS 3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 24 CONCRETE CURB AT SIDEWALK 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE a w rn 31 BEAVERTAIL CURB (13612) NOTED. n N 36 SIGN POST WITH BOLLARD Of - a a 5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF o EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. a a z �:z0 w 6. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. z o w a az s z 7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. _N W ~ 2 0 w �z U J � N _w=: O 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC > - a - LL z w Lnw�Ln� CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS O �_ AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF " w w � Q I- THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.LU TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. _ LL _ono = N a n 9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING a O z CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO W J ADJACENT PROPERTIES. m W 11. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED V LU BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. g U W Z Z O 0 SITE KEYNOTES SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY a A MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT • ADDRESS 1417 E 7TH STREET B MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT WITH SAWCUT C PAINT 4" WHITE DIAGONAL STRIPING • ZONING: B-4 D PAINT 24" HIGH WHITE LETTERS . PARCEL DESCRIPTION: L2 B1, UNION CROSSINGS 2ND ADDITION Cn E COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY (SEE CITY PLATE NO. 5008, SHEET C6.0) F DRIVE-THRU PULL -FORWARD PARKING • PROPERTY AREA: 40,602± SF (0.932± AC)em CO o G RPU PARKING • EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 4,522 SF (11.1%) z E H TRASH ENCLOSURE (SEE ARCH.) • PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 31,369 SF (77.3%) 3 S & Ja5EVREA� AND GUTTER MRAE • PARKING SETBACK: 6' O o I K ARM (S ARCH.) o r c L DRIVE-THRU PREVIEW BOARD (SEE ARCH.) • PARKING SPACE: 9' WIDE X 20' LONG v �E g M DRIVE-THRU SPEAKER CANOPY (SEE ARCH.) In N � Z N TRANSFORMER PAD BY OTHERS • PARKING RATIO REQUIREMENT CITY OF MONTICELLO 00 - O BOLLARD (SEE ARCH.) RESTAURANT: 1 SPACE / 40 SF OF DINING AREA 1 SPACE / 80 SF OF KITCHEN AREA m m m c 0 P CURB TRANSITION (B612 TO EXISTING) N N co VCO DINING: (291 SF INSIDE+ 470 SF OUTSIDE) / 40 20 SPACES KITCHEN: 904 SF / 80 12 SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 32 SPACES c x LL CL • PARKING PROVIDED: 33 SPACES = SIGN LEGEND S.1 STOP SIGN S.2 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE S.3 DRIVE THRU DIRECTIONAL SIGN SA DRIVE-THRU PULL -FORWARD PARKING S.5 RPU PARKING SIZE 30" X 30" 12" X 18" SEE ARCH SEE ARCH SEE ARCH MnDOT DESIGNATION R1-1 R7-8M N/A N/A N/A z Q CL w c) O J J W U SHEET NUMBER: H z O 1"=20' r� C2,0 w 0' 20' 40' 60' af m CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Q w DATE: 04/25/2024 Q PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 0 U 0 0 0 00 Ln 0 Ln 0 0 J u 0 0 00 Ln Ln 0 0 PAI SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN SAN / �AN -C Q \� 56.62 \ 0 GRADING LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED 980_ �980 — —982— — , ----982- - STO WAT SAN . 900.00 X 900.00 0.00% E.O. F .--< E+ SB-79 GRADING NOTES Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance PROPERTY LINE INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR CURB AND GUTTER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER RIDGE LINE SPOT ELEVATION FLOW DIRECTION EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ►�eJ1��leJ�\ 1\ l��l�l�\�leJ\ 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 2. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS. 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 6. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. 8. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 9. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES. 11. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY -LOADED TANDEM -AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RE -COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. 13. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2. 15. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. Q O N Y V) Y N N a U LLB V) J J U Z z 0 v z l7 U w = 0 w U = > N O N 00 0 \ O D Ln Ln a z Vl z 0 H 2 K w d o z r w w J V1 D N m N N O O L1 0 0 a a \I o rn _ V Z wS �o W �Ln Ln 'It W 2 a o= elf O v) az Lo ; v � (J z LU WQ 0 v Q V "' a w a � a aW � Of NT Wow W O aaz z 3 z LUz0Z ut W i�<z U V W z ~ O J F- O N F- wz O } W LL 0 0 LU ac w�z< �Q U w w H W z J W _ O W = J ~ = a =000 N o 9HLU W Z ~ Z O a2 2 a 0 0 m N > co p`m L L C � LO G ca Z QGV 3� L Y �o o c C V) N V) N ,qU� co o co c O rnrnrn 'a \I z 0-da z —0 LU oQ © Qz �c �< Q o Q J W U SHEET NUMBER: z O 1"=20' 0 C3,0 w 0' 20' 40' 60' af m CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Q w DATE: 04/25/2024 Q PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 STO 0 0 w 00 Ln 0 0 0 J u 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 1 Call 48 Hours before di � � Y o N digging: a a w o 811 or call811.com Q EROSION CONTROL LEGEND Common Ground Alliance aLA Z � z Z Q Z ON EXISTING PROPOSED " < ~ o v o > PROPERTY LINE �980INDEX CONTOUR —982- INTERVAL CONTOUR CURB AND GUTTER = SF — SILT FENCE sro ►► STORM SEWER ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 0 z SB-79 SOIL BORING LOCATION 00 Lu J O J � Ln co (Illllj (■) INLET PROTECTION coo �✓ N N O O w Ln vi vi � Ln Z .4 a 0 0 0 Q in z aaaa o _Z we VW o �Ln W o= o< rs�p W �— GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES LL W o LU 0 00 °C V Q 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF a w EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS a UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. � a � aw m<� � 2. ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN -PLACE PRIOR TO ANY a � N EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND a a o COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON -SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR o REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF a a z o EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO z w zOz in EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY g J w a Q Q U SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. ^ a o 0 ?�0 3. EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL (ESC): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE = w 0 ? z o RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THE LL o 0 0 � i CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND w Ln _ SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: CATCH BASIN INSERTS, CONSTRUCTION m o G s E o ENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. ESC SHALL COMMENCE WITH = GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY - 0 0 0 N o THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE Q O Z CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. W J ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE W TURF IS ESTABLISHED. m V J w 4. ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH U WORKING DAY. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO W Z z DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. z 50 5. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE RESTORED WITH a ` SEED AND MULCH, SOD, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR BE HARD SURFACE WITHIN 2 WEEKS d OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA, NPDES, MNDOT, AND CITY. 0 0 A. TEMPORARY (GREATER THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 22-111 AT 30.5-POUNDS PER ACRE. B. TEMPORARY (LESS THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (FALL) OR co 21-111 (SPRING/SUMMER) AT 100-POUNDS PER ACRE ° Ln G C L C. INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 34-262 AT 14.5-POUNDS PER '6 FL ACRE. O 3: oo c C D. POND SLOPES SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 AT 35-POUNDS PER ACRE. Z E. GENERAL SEEDING SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 25-151 AT 70-POUNDS PER ACRE. c1j L co ��� ��� o F. MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 APPLIED AT 2-TONS PER ACRE. N N co co 9. FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OR EROSION CONTROL SSE BLANKET IS REQUIRED. 10. ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUND THEM TO TRAP a � 3 SEDIMENT. 11. ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TO RESTORE THE POND TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION. 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 13. THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL -DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING OR OTHER MEANS REQUIRED TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS OR BUILDING PADS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW. 1"=20' L__ !I 0' 20' 40' 60' CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS z O V) O w SHEET NUMBER: z Q J J O z O U C4,0 DATE: 04/25/2024 0 0 J w U_ Z 0 w m Q w a PAI PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 0 0 D 00 Ln 0 0 0 J u 0 0 0 00 U') 0 LI1 0 0 PAI 0 TA 0 SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN g - SAN ZK N - \ �N \ \ �o ST S STo o 5 h`O ti Q 4- 5� F `o c 9oo``sr Q�� CONNECT TO EX.� �f'iLF 6" PVC STUB IE=948.00 (S) �009 �v 14 LF-6" PVC @ Toff Q 1.04% 0 h O ! \s v TO = ADJUST RIM 0 ELEVATION PER GRADING PLAN VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION, AND ELEVATION OF EX. STUBS AND CONTACT ENGINEER WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION EX. FIRE HYDRANT ,� \ c� CONNECT TO EX. 8" DIP CL 52 STUB 404 MH-1 W/ 8"X2" REDUCER 15.0' / I RE=958.65 IE=948.34 (SW) 2 14.4' ®< / IE=948.14 (N) �°I° , ' ° 2" CURB STOP D 3 o Q� MH-2 RE=958.47 IE=950.14 (S) PUG 1 0.0' e O I n U , u / w p PUG �; > L 1 N° v PUG t I 1 @)♦ �N ♦ j 4" X 4" WYE ' a j FG=959.29 '� ► Ol I IE-951.11 (S) ° IE=951.11 (E) n 2" WATERMAIN STUB 1 I IE=951.11 (N) 1 7•8' 15 LF-4" PVC @ j I ♦ VERIFY LOCATION WITH MECH. 1 1 a 9.26% R - 1 I MH-3 a SANITARY SEWER STUB-113 I 9.36 IE=952.50 (W) I E=952.05 (E) VERIFY LOCATION WITH MECH. I IE=951.19 O I SANITARY SEWER STUB-108 � IE=952.50 (W) z 1 VERIFY LOCATION WITH MECH. / STo 1 1 3 LF-4" PVC@ 1 I 2.08% PROPOSED I RESTAURANT I ' a 2,400 SF 1 CONNECT TO GREASE ° FFE = 960.50 INTERCEPTOR BY OTHERS a 2 LF-4" PVC @ 1 FG=959.40 2.08% B-3 IE=952.12 (W) 1 j ��. CONNECT TO GREASE a 1 INTERCEPTOR BY OTHERS 1 GREASE INTERCEPTOR FG=959.54 I 0 I BY OTHERS IE=952.45 (E) 600 _ 8-1 I � / 1 I S 01 a1S303d 1 a 010131� y v I 1 u j. Cry I 1 CTV I I E 7TH STREET - - - 0 I 1 1 EX. FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE SAN STO No IF, WAT WAT QD �} GAS FO CTV � H CURB AND GUTTER SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN HYDRANT GAS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC CABLE TELEVISION GATE VALVE LIGHT POLE GENERAL WATERMAIN & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION'' AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. 8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. 9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER AND WATER LINES SHALL CROSS ABOVE ANY SEWER. IF THIS IS NOT ACHIEVABLE, SANITARY AND STORM SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A MATERIAL APPROVED FOR USE WITHIN A BUILDING AND AS LISTED IN TABLE 701.2 OF THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. 10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE T OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 11. DUCTILE IRON WATER LINES SHALL BE CLASS 52, PER AWWA C115 OR C151. COPPER WATER LINES SHALL BE TYPE K PER ASTM B88. PVC WATER LINES SHALL BE PER AWWA C900 AND INSTALLED PER AWWA C605 IF ALLOWED BY CITY. 12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 8' MINIMUM COVER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 13. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND NOT WITHIN 10, OF A WATER LINE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS, AND WITHIN 10 FEET OF A WATER LINE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF A PRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TO MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.0. 14. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 604.10.1. 15. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE CLOW F-5750 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. THE ELECTRICAL ALARM SWITCH SHALL BE PART NO. PCVS2 (OR EQUIVALENT). 16. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS -BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. 17. ALL MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS. Call 48 Hours before di digging: � a � Y a l N o 811 or call811.com Q aLA Common Ground Alliance z U Z � Z O � w o = U 0 o = w > UPPER UTILITY LOWER UTILITY CROSSING BOTTOM OF PIPE TOP OF PIPE O STORM SANITARY ELEV = 955.0 ELEV = 951.3 O STORM SANITARY ELEV = 952.8 ELEV = 948.9 STORM WATER MAIN O ELEV = 952.6 ELEV = 950.7 i o rn V Zw a, � o W �Ln W a o= ° C OJ o~ c Qz 0O W 3:U / LU z LL LL 0 wQ W 0 ou °C V a 00 w a aW J Q W co 2 o a C, � N aa� w � � W � w aaz Z l7 z w z0z Ln W a > Q Q U Ln z ~O _ O w F- `n w z N }QQo � CD Ln w v N U w � Q >- J W _ N Q O W J = F- =000 N 0 a0 z W J mWtj LU U W Z ~ Z 0 0 a2 2 a 0) > cn v L In0 LC G � � V L Y o o c C O N O y Lo N Ln VI �- L? Ln Lo c m Lnn co O M 0) M N N N 00 Ln L° 00 d o X" d LL X z 06 Q Qor2z F-- LU OC Q z�`"_j © Q L.L. J W U_ SHEET NUMBER: Z O 1"=20' C5,0 w 0 0' 20' 40' 60' af m CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Q w DATE: 04/25/2024 Q PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 v c a� i a� V) O 0 a 0 0 3 a N 0 N 0 0 D 00 Ln 0 0 0 J u 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 PAI SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN - SAN SAN / - 5,AN 1� _ o I E 7TH STREET - - J M ADJUST RIM Q ELEVATION PER GRADING PLAN �'ir"'' •\ ST O \� VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION, AND ELEVATION C STUBS AND CONTACT ENGINEER WITH AN DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIOI` 0 STMH-100 (48" O) R-1642 RE=958.66 IE=951.57 (N) IE=950.47 (E) CONSTRUCT OVER EX. STUB (VERIFY ELEV. AND CONTACT ENGINEER W/ DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) _ 1� STORM SEWER LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED SAN STO WAT WAT GAS POH TUG TOH FO CTv Gr..] [3 PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN HYDRANT GAS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD TELEPHONE TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC CABLE TELEVISION GATE VALVE LIGHT POLE GENERAL STORM SEWER NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL STORM SEWER MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF ''STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION'' AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE LARGE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AND MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. ALL SMALL/DRY UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 12 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER AND WATER LINES SHALL CROSS ABOVE ANY SEWER. IF THIS IS NOT ACHIEVABLE, STORM SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A MATERIAL APPROVED FOR USE WITHIN A BUILDING AND AS LISTED IN TABLE 701.2 OF THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. 8. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 9. STORM SEWER PIPE: A. RCP AND HDPE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY OR MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY. B. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 181, AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76, WITH GASKETS PER ASTM C443. C. HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 10-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M252. HDPE STORM PIPE 12- TO 60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM D3212 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321. D. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321. E. ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS AND STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 707.3. STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712. 10. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 604.10.1. 11. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS -BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. 12. ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET AND MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS. Call 48 Hours before di digging: � a � Y a w N o 811 or call811.com Q aLA Common Ground Alliance z U Z � Z O � w o = U 0 o = w > CROSSING UPPER UTILITY LOWER UTILITY BOTTOM OF PIPE TOP OF PIPE O STORM SANITARY ELEV = 955.0 ELEV = 951.3 O STORM SANITARY ELEV = 952.8 ELEV = 948.9 STORM WATER MAIN O ELEV = 952.6 ELEV = 950.7 i o 0,)Z V w a, � o W �Ln C� W 2 o= Oo< Qz fs�O LLJ U QV Lw Z LL 0 wQ W 0 ou °C V Q 00 a w a � a aW � o a N Uf�o aow ,n Z W o aaz �: z 3 z w z0z in v)W z a Q Q U _ OO W `) w z V N }QQo � CD w�v) Uww� s Q_N CD J W LL O W J = F- a =0 0 N o °ao z W J Cal O V LU U W Z ~ Z O o a2 2 a 0) > cn O o'� W G R M V N f4 L Y 'pQ 2i O O o c C P_ c O N O y In N In VI 00- un L? L i0 c ccn cnn m O M 0) M N N N 00 LOLO0 Q d c o X" CL U W 3: z Q 2J Ila_ Lai 0 I /1 V J W U_ SHEET NUMBER: Z O 1"=20' 0 C51 w 0' 20' 40' 60' C� m CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Q w DATE: 04/25/2024 Q PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 0 0 CO L(1 CD Ln 0 0 J >_ U 0 / CD 0 Co 0 0 0 OR 5' IN BACK OF CURB IF CONCRETE WALK OR BITUMINOUS PATH ARE HYDRAFINDER PRESENT FLAG WATEROUS MODEL 67 HYDRANT YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. ;fl" Z AFTER BACK -FILL EXISTING OR FUTURE SKEET BREAKOFF FLANGE CURB OR GUTTER LINE w TO 2" MAXIMUM Q_ ABOVE BURY LINE (FINISHED GRADE) Q FINISHED GRADE a VALVE BOX AS WATERMAIN SPECIFIED 1" TO 2" w V) 2 LAYERS OF w 2 - POLY (4 mil) w 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PIT z Z UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 C.Y. OF 1 fO I O = 1-1/2" CLEAR STONE \l o MEGALUG L 1/4 STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALU" MEGALUG GATE VALVE TEE THRUST BLOCKING �` BEHIND BLOCKING THRUST HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE BELOW GATE VALVE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15% 15"x 4") BEHIND TEE Title: Standard Plate LibraryTypical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello tee: 03-05 Plate No. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER EXPANSION / \y JOINTS EXPANSION JOINTS B 6' m 5, a. . .a .. _ _e. a P 4. CONCRETE TO BE EXPANSION POURED INTEGRALLY EXPANSION LA WITH CURB JOINTS JOINTS PLAN - B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER VARIASLE 1 /4 ►'v/MIN ., =7" MIN. 7� PER3/4 . /Fr a� :L7" WIDTH VARIES 5' MIN. -I 800 SECTION B—B SECTION A —A Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Commercial Driveway Entrance Date: O 3 — O 5 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 5 8 CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) "CRETEX OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT ALL MANHOLES WITH ADJUSTING RINGS INSIDE DROP SECTION MIN 4" - MAX 12" SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) I 97" nIA MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CLASS II CIRCULAR REINF LATEST REVISION USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS STEPS AT 18" OC � 8" "CRE-SEAL","RESEAL", OR APPROVED EQUAL o 8" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE VARIABLE j t MAX. 24" 22 PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION WITH INVERT #5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE NOTES: 0 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. 2�y IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24" INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA-15 or CA-25 Riprap Bedding 6" MIN Title: Standard Sanitary Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 3001 Geotextile fabric Original grade 0 SECTION B-B (not to scale) _1-,l plates Original Geotextile fabric SECTION A -A grade (not to scale) NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trapping device A _U � I Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates I / � A ` A /o B o 0 j LLJ [L CD v z xl i w Match Existing Grade o o E 70( 0 p O U U v O v o v O L- v v o � o v o o •� v � o v o rn 0 B 24' min. Slope away from highway 50' min. or Right of Way PLAN Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance Date: 0 6 —14 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 6002 C CASTING ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME & COVER INSTALL INFRA (OR APPROVED EQUAL) SHIELD ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II " PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD z z 8" CAST -IN -PLACE PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP s © CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN -PLACE 0,0 N 4' TO 10' CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION o (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED z BY ENGINEER Z Z O CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE zo AND PIPE CONNECTION 2 N Q UJ Y m a STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O1 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. O MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED O5 GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello _ y MANHOLE MANHOLE.,,.; OR PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH BASIN BASIN DIA DIA SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK MASONRY CONSTRUCTION Title: Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer Date: o3-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4001 DF 1EIGHT PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CC-23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW IS )'2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY * FOR THE NEW R-3290-VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CC-3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello FILTER AS DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH -FLOW FABRIC Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6004 A Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance A 35-1/4" 43 PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R-3067-V EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA COLLAR 6" OPENENG�E II WITH 24"x 36" '15" 24" 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED M ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE (n *48" TYP AND PIPE CONNECTION w "DIMENSION VARIES e BASED ON STRUCTURE DIAMETER RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 433E OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-3508-A2. indard Plate Library Catch Basin Manhole City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: o3-17 4003 3 0.7 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 4:1 SLOPES 1.15 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 3:1 SLOPES 0" 20 3.75 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. HIGH FLOW CHANNEL S SHORELINE -S" 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6- (15Cm) DEEP X 6" (15Cm) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12' (30Cm) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" (30Cm) PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" 30Cm APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM, STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2--5- (5Cm-12.5=) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3' (7.5cm) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30Cm) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. NOTE: 'IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6' (15Cm) MAYBE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello Date: 0 3 - 0 8 Plate No. Revised: 6011 03-15 � # a a w o U LW In J J U � N Z J z z O U E F- w LU O w U 0 2 > N C) N 00 O \ O LU J) to Q Z LZ Z O 7) LU Of JO V Zw ID � IDLU �Ln Lr)� W � 5 O ~ G Q z fs�0 > �U U O V �w LL 0 wQ W 0 ov 00 °C V Q 0- LU d LL' Q J Q w o ¢ N QQC z a � w O aaz 3:zFD z w zOz v, < LAw a>aa w z ~- U U v �5C'W J IT w z:cc: W 2 z � LL>_oo oc u\i U ~� n� 2 N \ V w w N Q wzJw OC LU LU J� a = LU a 0 -00 N 0 a0 z W J mW O V _j H u W Z ~ Z 0 0 a > > m ov co LO °zE � � V C i£ L Y 'pQ 3:O O tJ O c C U V O N O y In (V Vf In In In MI;M c mmm o N N 0 InILD0 Q d c o x LL N (L UL V J W Q U ° J LU SHEET NUMBER: Z 0 0 C6,0 LU cl� 120 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Q W DATE: 04/25/2024 Q PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 O u 0 r) O Ln 0 Ln 0 0 J U CD 00 Ln CD Ln O O PAI TAU BACK OF rA� - v L .. CURB ( FACE OF • •�_ CURB - t r 1 ° <"`�• PAVEMENT MARKING DRIVING LANE FACE OF (TYP) (WIDTH VARIES) 3 ° 4" CONCRETE WALK WITH CURB S 4' MIN. OR 5' MIN. 4' MIN. OR 5' MIN. a CONTRACTION JOINTS EVERY 5' AND MAN. PER PLAN 5' MAN' PER PLAN EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 100' OR AT AJ °o AJ SLOPE 3/4" PER FT. N 90° INTERSECTIONS PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP PLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMP 2.00 FINISH GRADE a ° gro ° TIP 04T SLOPE 3/4" PER FT. ®CURB FACE RAMP 6' 0" ROAD OR GUTTER MIN. LANDING � 6 FT � °. ° ° 4' MIN. i► 6 FT ►i ° ... APPROACH a ° ° ° ° 5%SLOPE MAX SEE PLANLL IVING LANE ° (RIDTH VARIES) ° RAMP 8 MAX. SLOPE W S Ln 1/2" PREFORMED CONCRETE WALK M "' X" 8" 2% CROSS SLOPE N JOINT FILLER MATERIAL SECTION A -A a ROUND ALL SLOPED 4' Y III a ° °° ° g Q I I MAX. SIDE FLARE 10% INTERSECTIONS ° MAX. SLOPE IIO O IO O O OO OO O O O O O O O 4.75 SIDE FLARE RAMP _ I _ SIDE FLARE Curb Type X Y 5' MIN. �` 4' MIN. 5' MIN. NOTES: B612 12" 20" 1. TAPED AREAS TO BE CENTERED AND ALIGNED ON CENTER LINE AND LANE LINES. B618 18" 26" 4" MNDOT SPEC 3138 CLASS 5 6" MIN. ELEVATION OF RAMP MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN CENTER MEDIAN AREA. AGGREGATE BASE NOTES: 2. ZEBRA CROSSWALKS SHALL BE WHITE POLYMER -PREFORMED TAPE OR AN ACCEPTABLE B624 24" 32" 1. PROVIDE A RELATIVELY FLAT MINIMUM 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE BOTH DIRECTIONS. 3. A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FT. CLEAR DISTANCE MUST BE LEFT ADJACENT TO CURB. IF LAST STRIPED AREA FALLS 2. CURB RAMP AREA TO BE CONCRETE AND MEET LATEST ADA REQUIREMENTS. RAMP CROSS SLOPE 2% MAXIMUM. INTO THIS DISTANCE, IT MUST BE OMITTED. NOTE: BACK-TO-BACK PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 48'' LANDING BETWEEN, OR PROVIDE AT -GRADE CROSSING. 1. ALL TRAFFIC FLOW ARROWS TO BE SOLID WHITE REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT AS PER DIMENSIONS ABOVE NOTES: 4. REMOVE ALL CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. SIDE FLARES TO BE CONCRETE AND IMPLEMENTED WHERE ADJACENT TO PAVED AREAS. FLARED 1. EXPANSION JOINT SPACING IS 100' NOTES: SLOPE TO BE 10% MAXIMUM. EXISTING CURB RAMP ALTERATIONS, WITH NO LANDING, SHALL BE 8.33% MAXIMUM. 5. AT SKEWED CROSSWALKS, THE TAPED AREAS ARE TO REMAIN PARALLEL TO THE LANE LINES. 2. MIN. 3" CL. 5 UNDER C.&G. PROVIDE 10% MAXIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. WHERE PAVEMENT MARKINGS CAN NOT BE INLAYED INTO THE HOT MAT, PAVEMENT 3. CURB SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2531 1. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR WALK SCORING AND JOINT LAYOUT. 4. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE MAY NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH. SHALL BE GROOVED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE POLYMER -PREFORMED MARKINGS. 2. WALK SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2521 MIX NO. 3A32 WITH A 28 DAY DESIGN STRENGTH OF 3900 PSI. 5. RAMP AND FLARED SIDE SURFACE TO BE MEDIUM BROOM FINISH, PERPENDICULAR TO TRAVEL PATH. SEE Mn/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 2564. 6. WALK SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2521 MIX NO. 3A32 WITH A 28-DAY DESIGN STRENGTH OF 3900-PSI. LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: tvvwd 01/09/20 08/15/17 08/15/17 08/15/17 08/15/17 B6 STYLE CURB AND GUTTER VJ=tYYOod PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK VJ@StWOOd PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP YYBSttYY00d CROSS WALK STRIPING YYBSttYY00d TRAFFIC ARROW 5101 I I I S108 I 1 1 S109 1 1 1 S111 I I I S113 F-1 o FILL JOINT WITH FLOWABLE II - POLYURETHANE CAULK EDGE OF PAVEMENT (SELF LEVELING) FLUSH CAP REQUIRED 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT W/ #4 REBAR AT 16" O.C. EACH WAY WITH SURFACE 1 ' 8" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5 2" GALVANIZED I I I I COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR) ~ STEEL PIPE, L I I J O N ROUND, SET IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE 1" DIAMETER HOLE _ 8'-0" M.E.P. (TYP.) 1/8" 6'-0" P.O.V. 7 -0 BOTTOM OF THE 1/2" DIAMETER DOWEL BARS LOWEST SIGN TO 2.5" MnDOT TYPE SPWEA340B WEARING COURSE 2'-8" LONG @ 2' W/CAGE (OPTIOO SPACINGNAL -SEE BE MOUNTED MNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT GEOTECH. 2'-0" 60"-66" FROM MIN. PARKING GRADE PAVEMENT 2.5" MnDOT TYPE SPNWB330B BASE COURSE RECOMMENDATIONS) MOWING EDGE 3'-0" #6 REBAR 8" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5 PAVEMENT (TYP•) COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (HEAVY DUTY) ------------- I, 6, STEEL G^..'�.e - I I 6„ 1-4- 2'-0' CASING ;W=W-W-W-W W-W-W-W =W=W=W= 1,.'..� N-W MIN. = - 3'-6" MIN. FROST W-W- . W-W-W-II JOINT SPACING 1". CONCRETE NI w=w=w- DEPTH IF GREATER •.U., ilWWWW : [ -,I; WWWWWWWI� 2" MnDOT TYPE SPWEA3406 WEARING COURSE T = THICKNESS OF CONCRETE FOOTING -W=W= W=W=W=W=� CONCRETE CURB & I: W-W-W-W-v MAX -SIZE MAX -SIZE wWwWwWw= mWmWmWmWmW� MNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT SLAB THICKNESS AGGREGATE < 3/4" AGGREGATE > 3/4" GUTTER 1=W=W=W=W=W W=W=W=W=W=' 2" MnDOT TYPE SPNWB330B BASE COURSE WiTIWWWWWWW WW... .. WWWWWWWWii'u�_ 10" PAVEMENT 8" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5 4" 8' 1' 12" 5" 10' 13' io COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR) SIGN INSTALLED 6" 12' 15' IN LANDSCAPE AREA ACCESSIBLE STALL PARKING SIGN 9, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (STANDARD DUTY) INSTALLED IN PARKING LOT 7" 14' 18' NOTE: 8" 16' 20' NOTE: 1. SIGN TO BE 2-SIDED WHERE ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS FACE ONE ANOTHER. 1. THE JOINT FACES SHALL BE CLEANED AND PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHOWN ARE FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. 9" 18' 23' DRIED BY SANDBLASTING AND AIR BLASTING, 2. PARKING GRADE IS DEFINED AS EITHER FLOW LINE OF CURB OR PAVEMENT SURFACE REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS. AT THE HEAD OF THE STALL. 10" 20' 25' PRIOR TO SEALING THE JOINT. LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: SIGN POST INSTALLATION 11/16/2023 V1111165twood PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 08/15/17 Westwood PAVEMENT SECTIONS 08/15/17 VdmtWOOd SAW CUT CONTROL JOINT 01/29/24 S114 5116 5119 S122B EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC TYPE II - ADD WIRE MESH BACKING TYPE III -ADD WIRE MESH AND HAY BALES RESERVED PARKING STEEL OR B6 STYLE CURB WOOD POST /=� F� L� �N SEE DETAIL S101 -�\N C�NO'1 \ SITE CONTRACTOR BUILDING CONTRACTOR ONLY SIGNAGE PER �\� P SPO .�FEC G EXPANSION JOINT ACCESSIBLE �. / ��\ �\ 10" E�PP� S N ON CONC SIDEWALK q /�// // / /� / S� SP QQ EDGE OF w SIGNAGE AND �\� ��RCE CURB 9..: °. 8. ° m << STRIPING DETAIL \�✓ �Y\NO� FAN a Q ° Z z_ PONDING HEIGHT Lu 12' LONG - GALVANIZED 3 LB. 0 w • BASE MATERIAL ¢ U CHANNEL SIGN POST 36" HIGH MAX. FILTER FABRIC, Q Z = a . °a • o 0 0 0 0 0 4 w a- STEEL OR ATTACH SECURELY � � iD a o 0 WOOD POST TO UPSTREAM O 0 < PONDING HEIGHT _ _ J SIDE OF POST LL O 'AtPERSPECTIVE u, _ 6"0 CONCRETE FILLED STEEL I -III -III- POST PAINTED BLUE RUNOFF RUNOFF NO SCALE ��I �I �-I �-I ��I ��I 0� II IIIII/~ O o r NOTE: 6" z TOP OF ALL HANDICAP SIGNS TO BE SET i 4"x6" TRENCH N - O 0 AT UNIFORM HEIGHT REGARDLESS OF '�/` 3 m ICOMPACTED g VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN OR PENALTY FINE CKFI A SIGN INCLUSION. NOTE: BEAVERTAIL ": GRAVEL SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR WALK SCORING AND JOINT LAYOUT. )II ': STANDARD DETAIL 2000 P.S.I. CONCRETE TRENCH WITH NATIVE BACKFILL ALTERNATIVE DETAIL IIIP';' -=` sib:;;;=fiA= TRENCH WITH GRAVEL a.<_ .:::::.:...:::::...... 3„ SECTION A -A .' IIII •' NO SCALE '' L I' ` NOTES: 1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY. 2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE T - - - 1= - SEDIMENT OFF -SITE AND CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY. LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: LAST REVISED: CONCRETE CURB AT SIDEWALK 08/15/17 BEAVERTAIL CURB 08/15/17 vvwtOOd SIGN POST WITH BOLLARD 08/15/17 vvwtOOd SILT FENCE 08/15/17 S124 I S131 S136 1 GD02 SAW CUT OR DOUBLE TOOLED JOINT FILL JOINT WITH FLOWABLE POLYURETHANE CAULK (SELF LEVELING) FLUSH WITH SURFACE 1/2" DIAMETER DOWEL BARS 2'-8" LONG @ 2'-6" SPACING W/CAG E NOTES: 1. EXCEPT WHEN NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE PLANS, THE SMOOTH GREASED TIE BAR SPACING FOR ALL LONGITUDINAL CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE 2'-6" CENTER TO CENTER. 2. ALL TIE BARS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF GRADE 60 FOR AASHTO M-31 OR M-53. 3. JOINT WIDTH TOLERANCE IS +1/16 IN. TO -1/32 IN. 4. THE JOINT FACES SHALL BE CLEANED AND DRIED BY SANDBLASTING AND AIR BLASTING PRIOR TO SEALING THE JOINT. LAST REVISED: VdmtYYood CONSTRUCTION JOINT 08/15/17 S123 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance 3: < 3: * V J U z U Z < Z O 02 < H C1 U > It N O cV 00 0 O l/1 J z i O dl _ Z wCS O VWrj �Ln Ln W2do= a elf O �< elf Z LO > �U U 0u �w LU W Q 0 v V d "' w d aW J �aW 1 Of w�� Wow <<z z 3 z w zoz w Ln W < < Z U O ="�Ln F- n W J F-"'wz N O >- W w p O �� LU p[ O Ln Q W V w w Ln W zz J W _ O w�J� a _ < =000 N o 9pLU W Z ~ Z O a2 2 a > CO p` m L L0 � `0 QE ••+ Z V � C � Y t o c c LO N LO L9 c CV) mcq O rnrnrn 'IX V) J Q W J > U O J J W U SHEET NUMBER: H- z O C691 w af m CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Q w DATE: 04/25/2024 z PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 0 0 00 O 0 0 J U i i 0 0 00 O 0 0 io REVISIONS REV # DATE BY: 1 I 3/ 1 B/24 � J. P. sro PHOTOMETRIC PLAN PROVIDED BY OTHERS, NOT TO SCALE. +0.0 0.0 SAN g 0.0 0.0 0.1 \'k4N sTo �° 0� 0.1 0. :S 0.o 0.0 0. 0 0.1 0.2 1+.9 2.7\2.3 1. \ 0.1 0.1 + 2 +.2 + �1 0.1 0.1 0 + 5.5 +.1 4. + 6.o 6.1 +0. 0 + 9 + . 4.7 4.3 3.- +� 0.0 0.1 .3� 2.5 + 0 .8 4.6 4.5 3.. /b.0 0.1 1. 2. +.9 3.7 4.8 4.6 3 �.� 0.0 0.0 0. +.��0.4 0.8 3.5 + + 3.! o+ 0.0 0.0 .1,*0. /2 0.3 0 .� 2. 4.0 .6 0.0 0.1 Q&?,,/ 0.3 0.5 1. 4 .2 2.9 4.2 4. h n n ft - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, ALL DIMENSIONS AND LUMINAIRE LOCATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT RECOMMENDED POSITIONS. THE ENGINEER AND/OR ARCHITECT MUST DETERMINE APPLICABILITY OF THE LAYOUT TO EXISTING OR FUTURE FIELD CONDITIONS. THIS LIGHTING PATTERN REPRESENTS ILLUMINATION LEVELS CALCULATED FROM LABORATORY DATA TAKEN UNDER CONTROLLED CONDITIONS UTILIZING CURRENT INDUSTRY STANDARD LAMP RATINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY APPROVED METHODS. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF ANY MANUFACTURERS LUMINAIRE MAY VARY DUE TO VARIATION IN ELECTRICAL VOLTAGE, TOLERANCE IN LAMPS AND OTHER VARIABLE FIELD CONDITIONS. 3 \ + �1 \+ \ 1+ ."6. 10.2 3 ----- 4 0 Ar0�.1 0.1 0 - 0 wa � 5 + + 0.1 0.1 0.6'- - - -a--o- 0.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 Calculation Summary Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min PtSpcLr PtSpcTb PROPERTY LINE Fc 0.46 2.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. 10 N.A. DRIVE THRU Fc 2.88 4.6 1.2 2.40 3.83 10 10 ENTRANCE DRIVE Fc 2.49 3.4 1.6 1.56 2.13 PARKING & DRIVE Fc 2.85 5.5 1.2 2.38 4.58 sw - son� - i Luminaire Schedule WLS17583 PANERA MONTICELLO, MN PM: HOLLY PLEASE EMAIL US FOR PRICING AT HOLLY@WLSLIGHTING.COM Symbol Qty Label Lum. Lumens LLF Description WLS-Cl-132-4K7-5QW-SLW 25' MOUNTING HEIGHT Lum. Watts 0 IN 1 A 17605 0.970 135 ~s�® 4 B 15421 0.970 WLS-Cl-132-4K7-4F-HSS-90-B-SLW 25' MOUNTING HEIGHT 135 Call 48 Hours before digging: a � a 811 or call811.com J L U Ln Ai J Common Ground AllianceLA Z (D U Z Z O J v w = U 0 O M w > a N LL Z `° ° 0 ❑ [7 - X z Q � � ICI I W L W ❑ J air 2 ❑3 LO 03. U � 3OO� N❑3 . coLL a �o Id M ZE V7 ry O y C. G IL 0 N 0 0 1 Mr 1 M� W N O N 00 0 0 U) Ln Q z V`/ 1 z W 2 D V O 0 z O V D Z O af W CL LU w D V) LA N 0 0 a I O rn V Zw a, � o W �Ln W o= ° Oo� Qz rs�0 > 3 U U L2 V � w LL 0 wQ W 0 ou °C V a � w a V) Z U J a0 z W J mLLI O V H u W Z ~ z 0 0 a2 � a > CO Ov o') L LLIJ C W G R z 8 L Y 2i O O c C r O O N O y In N In VI 00 Ln L? L i0 C mcnnm O M 0) 0 N N N 00 Lf) L0 00 O O aD d oX� (L LL V_ oC w 2z Q OJ �OL O V) z O U = 0 J w SHEET NUMBER: Z OC G CTO Q w C� m DATE: 04/25/2024 W Q NUMBER: 0045058.00 0_ PROJECT O u Sro STO PLANT SCHEDULE - SAN - SAN �IAIN �4N STO \ Sgti 0 h / C n 40 i QJC° i i i SRO, - \ � o � J Sq \ \ \ \ T \ \ I '•.i �� STO 4 WIT � z /1 - SGM \ ,' I i Q �'♦♦ 1 - SGM - .�o 5 7 - KFG a i O UG ' , 5-PDS a� I t 6 ♦ PDS 15 - CCS C a ♦ C B 5-ACB . 1. A '6-J P -3 IMH ♦ i 3- G / 5 - CCS / 1 1 ♦ 1 I ♦ 1 9 - DBH I 1 ° i PROPOSED / ' ♦ i RESTAURANT 1 � 1 ♦ 2,400 SIF / a FIFE = 960.50 5 1 1 -CCS 1 I ' 1 1 �1 7 - 1 •.: / DBH �, 1 a' / 1 1 1 1 I A I 1 I I I I 12 - ICD I 1 ' SNbla1S3Q 010731A1 ' a , I I , CODE I QTY I COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME I SIZE SPACING O.C. I MATURE SIZE CONIFEROUS TREES BHS 1 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE / PICEA GLAUCA 'DENSATA' 6' HT B&B AS SHOWN H 35'-45' W 20'-25' DECIDUOUS TREES SGM 2 SIENNA GLENS MAPLE / ACER X FREEMANII 'SIENNA' 4" CAL AS SHOWN H 45'-50' W 35'-40' IMH 5 IMPERIALS HONEY LOCUST / GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'IMPCOLE' 4" CAL AS SHOWN H 30-35' W 30-35' SWO 4 SWAMP WHITE OAK / QUERCUS BICOLOR 4" CAL AS SHOWN H 40'-60' W 30'-40' CONIFEROUS SHRUBS HOA 18 1 HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAE / THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'HOLMSTRUP' #5 CONT. 5A" O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUB DBH 116 1 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE / DIERVILLA LONICERA 1 #5 CONT. 3A" O.C. I H 2-3' W 2-3' CCS 125 I DOUBLE PLAYS CANDY CORNS SPIREA / SPIRAEA JAPONICA 'NCSX1' I #5 CONT. 13'-0" O.C. I H 2-3' W 2-3' oANNUALS/PERENNIALS ICD 120 1 ICE CARNIVAL DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS X 'ICE CARNIVAL' #1 CONT 24" O.C. H 18"-24" W 18"-24" a ACB 116 1 NORTHERN EXPOSURE' AMBER CORAL BELLS / HEUCHERA X 'TNHEUNEA' 1 #1 CONT. 24" O.C. H 12-18" W 18-24" J Co o GR (SSES o KFG 17 RL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS / CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' #1 CONT 30" O.C. H 4-5' W 2-3' CD PDS 19 AIRIE DROPSEED / SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS #1 CONT. 30" O.C. H 2-3' W 2-3' U 0 ABBREVIATIONS: B&B = BALLED AND BURLAPPED CAL. = CALIPER HT. = HEIGHT MIN. =MINIMUM O.C. = ON CENTER QTY .= QUANTITY CONT. = CONTAINER 0 Ln NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. 0 Ln 0 0 z C • = =Ar �- - �Ar 0 0 is G 7STO A� c� � 110 GAS LANDSCAPE LEGEND PLANTING NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH -BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 6" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND NATURAL COLORED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY -VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN -GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS -BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. LANDSCAPE SUMMARY SITE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: • 10.0 ACI OF CANOPY TREES (INCLUDING AT LEAST 1 EVERGREEN TREE) PER ACRE + AT LEAST 2 SHRUBS PER EACH OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE 10 FT OF BUILDING PERIMETER. ACI REQUIRED: 10 ACI (40,602/43560=.93= 1 x 10= 10) SHRUBS REQUIRED: 47 (232 LF/10= 23.2 x 2= 46.4= 47 SHRUBS) VEHICLE USE PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS**: OVERSTORY CONIFEROUS TREE • EACH PERIMETER LANDSCAPE STRIP SHALL INCLUDE AT LEAST 8 AGGREGATE CALIPER INCHES (ACI) OF CANOPY TREES PER 100 LF OF LANDSCAPING STRIP, THE REMAINING GROUND SHALL BE LANDSCAPED (SOD, MULCH, ETC) ACI REQUIRED: 46 ACI (575 LF/100= 5.75 x 8= 46) ORNAMENTAL TREE SHRUBS PERENNIALS EDGER LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES Q A SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) B EDGER (TYP.) C SOD (TYP.) PERIMETER BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: • EXCEPT FOR ADJOINING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL USED. ADJOINING COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES OCCURING WITHIN THE SAME ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY, AND USES IN THE CCD DISTRICT, ALL DEVELOPMENT SHALL PROVIDE A PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO SEPARATE USES IN A DIFFERENT USE CLASSIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH Table 4-2: Buffer Types, and Table 4-3: Buffer Type Application TOTAL REQUIREMENTS**: ACI REQUIRED: 46 ACI SHRUBS REQUIRED: 47 SHRUBS ACI PROVIDED: 46 ACI SHRUBS PROVIDED: 47 SHRUBS ** PLANTINGS REQUIRED TO MEET VEHICULAR USE AREA AND PERIMETER VEHICLE USE AREA LANDSCAPING STANDARDS CAN BE COUNTED TOWARDS MEETING SITE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. REMOVE CONTAINER, SCARIFY SIDES, AND SET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL BASE MOUND, MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE 4� b .410 v oaQ p MULCH AS SPECIFIED (AND FILTER FABRIC, 1�1Oa AS INDICATED) m �0 0 vQ 6 owe a EDGING AT PLANTING BEDS, AS SPECIFIED, a oQ� ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS ICO �/� " •' : \ SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. DEPTH PER CONTAINER SOIL DEPTH BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED PLANTING SOIL OR AS APPROVED SET CONTAINER ROOT SOIL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR MILD COMPACTED SOIL FOR DEPTH TO MATCH FINISH GRADE N.T.S. LAST REVISED: 1Mestwlood SHRUB & PERENNIAL 10/23/18 LA27-C CONTAINER PLANTING PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ° s� 6? ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND t CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) o 1' OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF a ° STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. d�u 4 e STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED =d m Q WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR 6 POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT ° AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. �. c� 07 d�Q SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG Po POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 ��ya MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. o TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED. X PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER BALL PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. DIAMETER FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. //\\ \ : • REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: Nlestw�ood DECIDUOUS TREE 10/19/18 LA28 PLANTING PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF o STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED :o WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT o o , AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. 9' SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG �3a a8 g POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. o PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER Irv2 BALL PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. DIAMETER FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. /�/ ��\\//•�/�\/�/\\�/\\ BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: Westwood EVERGREEN TREE 10/19/18 LA29 PLANTING Call 48 Hours before digging: Y Q a Y ¢ J N o 811 or call811.com N Q Ln Common Ground Alliance o `L' lD U Z Z O IN v M U t] 02 > w a O z r w w Z:) J Ln D N m N N 0 0 CN Ln 0 0 a a \I Q I- C) rn V Z w �o W 5'L n' N� W a o= elf O L elf Q Z LO W LU U 0u / 0w Z LU WQ 0 U V d "' w d Ln 00 m w Q oa= � Of aaW z Wow z� aaw O z Z w zo= Ln J n K z aaa n W W LL J 0 ~tea- 0 N w =wz z a LL ] J 0 Ln Ln LU w H \ V w >o� ^ Of O m J W LU =C) 00 ap z W J CalW O V � 9pLU W Z Z O a 0 m x > CO p` co L L0 C � � G ca 3� y Y t 3 o c c LO N LO L9�L c c i co co O rnrnrn rn In CO c O x LL d U_ \I J O J U-i V H SHEET NUMBER: z O 1"=20' L1I !I00 w 0 Of 0' 20' 40' 60' Q CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT ATE: 04/25/2024 Q PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 © 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. F/1i'�/1A la del PROPOSED RESTAURANT 2,400 SF FFE = 960.50 0' 50' 100, PREPARED FOR: DESIGNED: AKW CHECKED: SSA DRAWN: AKW CA COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PANERA BREAD MONTICELLO FIELD CREW: 3805 EDWARDS RD, SUITE 390 MONTICELLO, MN FIELD WORK DATE: CINCINNATI, OH 45209 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com ommon uround Alliance Westwood SHEET NUMBER: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 FIRE TRUCK TURNING Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 EXHIBIT Toll Free (888)937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. PROJECT NUMBER: 0045058.00 1 DATE: 04/08/2024 co U� N O N U c O M L 0 c M N (D U O 0 co U) (D U) C0.1 CIVIL COVER C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C4.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.0 SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN C5.1 STORM SEWER PLAN C6.0 CITY DETAILS C6.1 CITY DETAILS C7.0 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN �m�uu�� 11 - � � "�.� �. I ARCHITECTURAL SITE -==-Y - - - ° o AS1.0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AS1.1 SITE DETAILS AS1.2 DRIVE THRU EQUIPMENT - - - AS2.0 SIDEWALK & UTILITY PLAN f IIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III I IIII I IIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII.1 IIIII IIIII IIIII! 1•.11 I l: I I ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT DIRECTORY CLIENT ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL MP&E CIVIL A1.0 FLOOR PLAN A2.0 ROOF PLAN A2.1 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A3.0 DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILS A4.0 ELEVATIONS A4.1 COLOR ELEVATIONS A5.0 WALL SECTIONS A5.1 WALL SECTIONS A5.2 WALL SECTIONS A6.0 DETAILS STRUCTURAL II S0.0 GENERAL NOTES S0.1 GENERAL NOTES S1.0 FOUNDATION PLAN S2.0 HEADER FRAMING PLAN S2.1 ROOF FRAMING PLAN S3.0 FOUNDATION DETAILS S3.1 FOUNDATION DETAILS S4.0 FRAMING DETAILS S5.0 FRAMING ELEVATIONS MECHANICAL COMPTON MJM ARCHITECTS MJM ARCHITECTS ENTECH WESTWOOD M1.1 HVAC-M2.1 HVAC -FLOOR SCHEDLES AND DETAILS PLAN ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC PLUMBING P1.1 PLUMBING SCHEDULES AND DETAILS P2.1 PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN ELECTRICAL 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 (`INI(`II�INIDTI ()P Ar.?nQ 2948 SIDCO DR NASHVILLE, TN 37204 2948 SIDCO DR NASHVILLE. TN 37204 5301 Virginia Way SUITE 140 RrAnfininnrl TIU '�717177 12701 Whitewater Drive Suite 300 KAinnAfnnl<a KANI rrgdq E0.1 ELECTRICAL -SITE PLAN E1.0 LIGHTING - FLOOR PLAN E2.0 POWERS/SYSTEMS - FLOOR PLAN E3.0 ELECTRICAL - LEGENDS AND SCHEDULES E4.0 ELECTRICAL - LEGENDS AND SCHEDULES Mark Wilhoite JEFFREY STAHL LARRY GRIFFITH Ben Hunter Adam Wangsness 513.852.1231 615-244-8170 615.244.8170 615.3732640 952 207-7640 mwilhoite@comptonaddy.com j.stahl@mjmarch.com I.griffith@mjmarch.com bhunter@entechtn.com adam.wangsness@westwoodps.com GENERAL NOTES SYMBOLS ABBREVIATIONS CODES AB ANCHOR BOLT FOF FACE OF FRAMING OPNG OPENING I. APPLICABLE CODES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL DOCUMENTS AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS. HE SHALL CONFIRM WORK A. 2020 MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE ARCHITECTURAL ACOUST ACOUSTICAL FOM FACE OF MASONRY OPP OPPOSITE SHOWN IS VIABLE. ANY CONFLICTS, OMISSIONS, ETC. SHALL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TO THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO NORTH AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR FD FLOOR DRAIN P PAINT B. 2020 MINNESOTA FIRE CODE PERFORMANCE OF ANY WORK IN QUESTION. ALT ALTERNATE F/O FACE OF PC PIECE C. 2020 MINNESOTA MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODE ALUM ALUMINUM FIN FINISH PL, P PLATE D. 2020 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL, COUNTY, STATE & FEDERAL CODES AND ORDINANCES. APPROX APPROXIMATELY FL FLOOR PLAS PLASTER, PLASTIC E. 2024 MINNESOTA COMMERCIAL ENERGY CODE ARCH ARCHITECT/ARCHITECTURAL FDN FOUNDATION PLYWD PLYWOOD F. MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL CODE 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. IF DIMENSIONS ARE IN QUESTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING CLARIFICATION G. 2020 MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE CONTINUING WITH CONSTRUCTION. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYP BDX% A QU. FINISH OR SECTION CUT BD BOARD FS FLOOR SINK PAINTED BLDG BUILDING FT FOOT, FEET QUAN QUANTITY FACE OF BLOCK UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND COORDINATE ALL TRADES. CONTRACTOR XX BLK BLOCK FTG FOOTING R RADIUS; RISER II. OCCUPANCY GROUP: SHALL VERIFY ALL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO ENCLOSING AREA WHERE EQUIPMENT IS TO BE BLKG BLOCKING GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR RD ROOF DRAIN A. ASSEMBLY (A2) PLACED, INCLUDING CASEWORK SIZES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES. BM BEAM GA GAUGE; GYPSUM ASSOC. REINF REINFORCING BOS BOTTOM OF STEEL GALV GALVANIZED REQD REQUIRED III. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 4. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING PERMITS FOR FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE ALARM, PLUMBING, SIGNAGE ROOM NAME ROOM BRG BEARING GEN GENERAL RESIL RESILIENT A. V-B (WHERE APPLICABLE) MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THOSE SYSTEMS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ROOM NUMBER xxx BS BOTH SIDES GL GLASS/GLAZING-GLUE REV REVISION, REVERSE ROOM AREA xxxsF BTM BOTTOM GWB GYPSUM BOARD RM ROOM IV. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM: 5. CONCEAL ALL PIPING INSIDE WALL, WHERE PIPING IS TOO LARGE, WALLS ARE TO BE FURRED OUT THE MINIMUM DIMENSION TO CONCEAL BTS BUILD TO SUIT H HIGH RO ROUGH OPENING A. NA PIPING. E]_( BUR BUILT UP ROOF HB HOSE BIBB RQMTS REQUIREMENTS CI CAST IRON HC HANDICAPPED RTS REHAB TO SUIT V. BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA: (1 BC TABLE 503) 6. ELECTRICAL PANELS, FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS, ETC. IN STUD WALLS SHALL BE BACKED WITH DRYWALL AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN LARGE SCALE X CJ CONTROL JOINT HDW HARDWARE RTU ROOF TOP UNIT A. BUILDING HEIGHT: 20'-0" (1 STORY) WALL RATING. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WALL THICKNESSES REQUIRED FOR ALL ELECTRICAL PANELS, FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS, ETC. DETAIL XX CT CERAMIC TILE HM HOLLOW METAL RWL RAIN WATER LEADER B. BUILDING AREA: 2,479 SF 7. PROVIDE DOUBLE STUDS &BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS, -TYP. CASEWORK, GRAB CAB CABINET HORIZ HORIZONTAL SCHED SCHEDULECEM CEMENT(ITIOUS) HP HIGH POINT SD SELF DEVELOP VI. OCCUPANT LOAD (TABLE 1004.1.1) -HEATED AND COOLED SF BARS, AWNINGS, ETC. A. 2,479 SF - OCCUPANTS = LESS THAN 99 CG CORNER GUARD HT HEIGHT SF SQUARE FEET, STOREFRONT CL CLEAR HVAC HEATING VENTILATING &AIR SHT SHEET FINAL LOAD PER TENANT DOCUMENTS 8. FIREPROOFING, SEALANTS & DAMPERS MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON SOME DETAILS FOR CLARITY. HOWEVER, ALL ASSEMBLIES MUST BE REVISION x CL, C L CENTERLINE CONDITIONING SIM SIMILAR INSTALLED AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN RATING INDICATED ON PLANS. ALL PENETRATION SEALANTS OR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE UL LISTED (OR CLG CEILING ID INSIDE DIAMETER SMS SHEET METAL SCREW EQUIVALENT) FOR INSTALLATION WITHIN THE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY NOTED ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CDCMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT INCL INCLUDE(ING) SPECS SPECIFICATIONS VII. EXIT CAPACITY: OBTAINING CLARIFICATION FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION CO CLEAN OUT INSUL INSULATION SQ SQUARE A. MINIMUM NUMBER OF EXITS: (TABLE 1021.1) COL COLUMN INT INTERIOR, INTERMEDIATE SQ FT SQUARE FOOT/FEET 1. OCCUPANT LOAD > 50 = 2 EXITS, MINIMUM 9. WHERE WALL RATINGS APPEAR ON BOTH SIDES OF DOORS AND OR WINDOWS THE WALL TYPE SHOWN SHALL CONTINUE ABOVE THE WALL TYPE CONC CONCRETE JT JOINT SS SERVICE SINK, STAINLESS STEEL 2 EXITS PROVIDED FRAME TO THE CEILING OR STRUCTURE AS APPLICABLE. CONST CONSTRUCTION LAM LAMINATED STD STANDARD CONT CONTINUOUS LF LINEAR FEET STL STEEL B. NUMBER OF EXITS PROVIDED: 1 MIN 10. THE HINGE SIDE OF ALL INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES SHALL BE PLACED 4" FROM THE ADJACENT INTERIOR WALL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BENCH MARK CONTR CONTRACTOR LG LONG, LARGE STOR STORAGE C. MINIMUM EXIT WIDTH REQUIRED (1005.1): CPT CARPET LL LANDLORD STRUCT STRUCTURAL (A-2) (99 OCCUPANTS X .15") = 14.85" REQUIRED 11. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN ONE SET OF THE PLANS IN GOOD CONDITION TO NOTE & DOCUMENT ALL CHANGES DURING CR CARTRAIL,CHAIRRAIL LLH LONG LEG HORIZONTAL SUSP SUSPENDED A. 108" PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION. THIS SET OF PLANS SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER AS PART OF THE REQUIRED CLOSE OUT PACKAGE. CSK COUNTERSUNK LLV LONG LEG VERTICAL T TREAD X D DEPTH; DEEP LP LOW POINT T/B TOP & BOTTOM 12. THE SPECIFICATIONS ARE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS CONTAINS A GENERAL SPECIFICATION FOR ALL OF THE EXTERIOR DBL DOUBLE MAS MASONRY TEL TELEPHONE WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION. ELEVATION XX DEMO DEMOLITION MATL MATERIAL T/O TOP OF 13. ALL SOIL UNDER FOOTINGS TO BE TREATED WITH TERMICIDE BEFORE INSTALLATION - SEE SPECIFICATIONS. DET DETAIL MAX MAXIMUM TO TAKE OVER DIA DIAMETER MECH MECHANICAL TOM TOP OF MASONRY 14. DEFERRED SUBMITTALS DN DOWN MED MEDIUM TOS TOP OF STEEL THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE SUBMITTED AS DEFERRED SUBMITTALS BY THE APPROPRIATE INSTALLING SUBCONTRACTOR OR VENDOR. X DIM DIMENSION MFR MANUFACTURER TH THICK(NESS) FOR EACH DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEM, THE SUBCONTRACTOR OR VENDOR SHALL FIRST SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERED DO DOOR OPENING MIN MINIMUM TYP TYPICAL DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO THE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR FIRE INTERIOR DS DOWNSPOUT MISC MISCELLANEOUS UL UNDERWRITERS LABORATORY MARSHAL. ARCHITECT'S REVIEW WILL BE FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE BUILDING DESIGN ONLY. SUBCONTRACTOR OR VENDOR ELEVATION X XX X DWG DRAWING MO MASONRY OPENING UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND PAYMENT OF ALL FEES FOR SUBMITTALS. THE GENERAL E EAST MRGB MOISTURE RESISTANT V VOLT CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE TIMING OF SUBMITTALS SO AS TO NOT INTERFERE WITH OVERALL CONSTRUCTION EA EACH GYPSUM BOARD VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE SCHEDULE, ALLOWING TIME FOR APPROPRIATE REVIEWS FOR ARCHITECT AND BUILDING OFFICIAL OR FIRE MARSHAL. NO DELAYS OR TIME X E EXTENSIONS WILL BE ALLOWED FOR FAILURE TO ALLOW APPROPRIATE TIME FOR REVIEW. EIFS EXT. INSULATION FINISH SYS. MTL METAL VERT VERTICAL EXPANSION BOLT MTD MOUNTED VVERIFY IN FIELD EJ EXPANSION JOINT N NORTH W WIDTH; WASTE; WEST; WIRE EXTERIOR WALL SIGNAGE WINDOW NUMBER OX EL ELEVATION (FLOOR) NIC NOT IN CONTRACT W/ WITH ELEV ELEVATION NO, # NUMBER WC WATER CLOSET ELEC ELECTRICAL NTS NOT TO SCALE WD WOOD DOOR NUMBER O EQ EQUAL O/A OVERALL WT WEIGHT EQUIP EQUIPMENT OFD OVERFLOW DRAIN W/H WATER HEATER E/W EACH WAY O/H OVERHEAD W/I WITHIN TOILET ACCESSORIES O EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER O/O OUT TO OUT W/O WITHOUT EXIST EXISTING OC ON CENTER WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC EXP EXPOSED, EXPANSION OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER EXT EXTERIOR OD OFFICE DEPOT/OVERFLOW DRAIN INDEX OF DRAWINGS INDEX OF SHEETS A R ' � A � ' ' ' ' ' REVISION REVISION DATE SHEET SHEET TITLE rIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIm rIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i GENERAL G1.0 ICOVER G2.0 IWORK LETTER G3.0 ICOMCHECK CIVIL ARCHITECTURE 2948SIDCODR PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. COVER Gi 00 A EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF LANDLORD'S WORK SITE WORK HVAC Landlord to complete all site improvements, including common areas, interior and peripheral landscape areas with landscaping required per local codes, irrigation laterals and heads in the landscaping areas with service feeds to the Premises pursuant to Tenant's Plans —including tap and meter fees, parking lots, Drive Thru lane and striping, parking lot signage, site bollards, curbs and gutters including curbs around the building, sidewalks as required by local codes, Drive Thru Lane concrete drive paths (if required), conduits (including connecting Drive Thru directional signage to the building pad site (if required)), parking lot lighting, drives, curb cuts and approaches, dumpster enclosure, gates and concrete approach pad to the enclosure, Outdoor Seating Area, handrails, all per Tenant's Plans. Parking lot in accordance with Applicable Laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act. Landlord shall not pave the parking lot and/or Drive Thru Lane until Tenant has completed (and Landlord has approved) Tenant's Plans, including plans showing the location of all pipes and conduits to be located under the pavement. Landlord shall install curb cuts and cement landings adjacent to the front and service entrances adequate to provide access for Tenant's delivery bakery carts. Parking lot to include all Drive Thru Lane striping. Dumpster enclosure large enough to provide two (2) 8-yard containers dedicated for tenants use only, patio (including posts), and monumental sign per Tenant's Plans and Applicable Laws, for Tenant's exclusive use, unless otherwise specified in the Lease, and as located on Exhibit A to the Lease. Landlord to provide cart corral (if required), per Tenant's plans. Underground conduit and pedestal only for electric vehicle charging stations (if required by local code), with location to be approved by Tenant. A minimum three (3) new Carrier Brand (or other brand as approved by Tenant) gas -fired roof top units per Tenant's Plans and specifications --capable of supplying a total of one ton of cooling/heating per 140 square feet (at least 17.4 tons which shall consist of one 10 ton and two 5-ton units if not specified on Tenant's Plans) and 20 CFM/person of fresh air. No ton unit(s) shall be accepted by tenant. All rooftop units are to be provided with Factory Applied Corrosion Protection on all Premises located within five (5) miles of the coastline. Locations of units and actual tonnage shall be per Tenant's Plans. Units shall be sleeved into Premises (and to include any fire rated enclosure required by Applicable Laws) and delivered to Tenant in operational condition including all required plumbing and electrical connections, as well as all required roof curbs, penetrations, and patching. Thermostats per Applicable Laws (Enerstat DSL-700 Digital Set -Point): minimum one (1) for each unit with remote sensors to be located coiled up and left under the unit for tenant to locate during their build out. Rooftop exhaust fans, capable of providing 1000, 500, and 500 CFM kitchen exhaust per Tenant's Plans. Fans to be sleeved into the Premises (and include any fire rated enclosure or dampers as required by Applicable Laws) and delivered to Tenant in operational condition including all required plumbing and electrical connections, as well as all required roof curbs, penetrations, and patching. Location per Tenant's Plans. Rooftop exhaust fan for restrooms, which provides 75 CFM per fixture or as local code requires. Fan to be sleeved into the Premises (and include any fire rated enclosure required by Applicable Laws) and delivered to Tenant in operational condition including all required plumbing and electrical connections, as well as all required roof curbs, penetrations, and patching. Location per Tenant's Plans. Landlord to provide access from the Premises to roof via permanent affixed ladder with lockable cover to structure for all HVAC systems (including but not limited to, oven exhaust and make-up air ducting, oven flues, water heater flues, toilet exhaust, and fresh air intake) required by Tenant. Access route shall not exceed design capacity of Tenant's HVAC systems. Landlord shall provide all chases with fire rating and/or access pathways to meet all Applicable Laws. ELECTRICAL Electrical Service 600-amp service 120/208 volt, 3 phase, 4 wire electrical service stubbed to a Main Distribution Panel with breakers, provided by the Landlord in the Premises and furnished with meter and 600 amp disconnect as required by Applicable Laws and local utility company. Location per Tenant's Plans. Specification for Distribution Panel shall be an integrated panel system as manufactured for Panera Bread by Carolina Products, Inc. Or alternate approved panel system. Electrical Miscellaneous (2) — 2" conduits for each network service (data network and voice services), requiring two separate access points into the building (cannot be shared by providers). The conduits should begin at the edge of the property and extend to the building, in conformance with Tenant's Plans. Landlord to ensure both conduits are completed with available power (temporary power is acceptable when delivered so that Tenant may test IT equipment). Landlord is obligated to ensure availability of Local Exchange Carrier (LEC) services into the Premises, that must accommodate at least one (1) 5M Ethernet Circuit, one (1) commercial broadband circuit from a diverse carrier, as well as adequate space on the roof for a Fixed Wireless antenna. Each service will require either a copper or fiber cable to the Premises. This cable must be extended from the facilities to the street LEC connection point, to the central demarcation/telephone room within the building. The Ethernet Circuit must be a 5M Ethernet Circuit from AT&T. The broadband connection is offered and provided by a local provider, with a minimum connection speed of 100M down x 20M up. If either of the minimum requirements cannot be sourced, Landlord shall notify Tenant at least 120 days prior to the projected opening date. If LEC construction and engineering is required to deliver this service, those costs will be the responsibility of the Landlord. Site and security lighting as required per Tenant criteria and Applicable Laws and as required to maintain the Premises in a safe and secure manner. Landlord to provide conduit and pull string to Tenant's monument/pylon location. All exterior sconce and safety lighting at ingress and egress furnished and installed by Landlord. Landlord to provide one (1) roof penetration (pitch pocket) for miscellaneous IT cabling. PLUMBING Minimum 2" dedicated domestic cold -water line and all associated metering and backflow prevention (including any and all "tap" fees & "meter" fees and the like, per the terms of the Lease), valved and capped inside of demising line of the Premises. Location per Tenant's Plans. A minimum of 60 PSI (45 PSI after any metering and backflow prevention devices) and a maximum of 70 PSI is required throughout the Term of the Lease. 4" sanitary sewer line inside the Premises and below floor (minimum depth of 36", or greater if necessary to handle any increased flow of Tenant, installed as required for flow), location per Tenant's Plans. Grease trap to be furnished and installed by Landlord, including all venting-- if required by code. Per Tenant's Plans, Landlord shall stub grease waste line from interceptor into the Premises, minimum depth of 36" and provide all required venting in accordance with local code requirements. Sanitary vent (capped) sized per code stubbed above nominal ceiling height inside the Premises. Natural gas service capable of providing 1600 MBH including all associated pressure regulators, valves, and metering. Service shall deliver gas to the Premises at a pressure between 9" — 12" WC, valved and capped within the Premises. Location per Tenant's Plans. Two exterior hose bibs will be provided and installed as shown on Tenant's Plans. FIRE PROTECTION If required by applicable codes, fire main sized per Applicable Laws and Tenant's Plans, backflow prevention and meter, valved (including any and all "tap - in" fee & "meter" fees, per the terms of the Lease), and all associated piping brought to, and distributed within, the Premises. Sprinkler coverage (drops and heads) distributed throughout the Premises and zoned properly per requirements of Applicable Laws and Tenant's Plans. Main sprinkler line to be no lower than 14'-6" A.F.F. and have a functioning flow switch if required by Applicable Laws. PERIMETER WALLS Perimeter walls to be framed with a minimum 3-5/8" 20-gauge metal studs, R-13 insulation —to the underside of the roof structure—R Value and type as required by code-- Seal all penetrations, gaps, existing holes, etc. with fire -rated sealant. STRUCTURAL, EXTERIOR, STOREFRONT & ENTRY DOORS Structural system (including but not limited to: roof system, roof mounted equipment support, floor system, load bearing walls, Mobile Pick -Up bump out and structural columns all per Tenant's Plans) capable of handling all loads required by code and by Tenant's construction. Landlord agrees to construct a clear span structural system with no columns within the Premises. All entrances at street or walkway level per federal, state, and local handicapped accessibility codes including all applicable clear space, radius landings, railings, and required door hardware. The new exterior glazing system includes aluminum brake metal frames, glazing, and aluminum brake metal -framed glass door. Location and design per Tenant's Plans. All exterior glass to be 1" insulated. If Applicable Laws requires high impact glass or shutters to be installed, Landlord will provide 1" insulated high impact glass. Front entry includes heated air curtain, wooden door pulls, aluminum brake metal frames, glazing, and aluminum brake metal -framed glass door, all associated hardware including all finishes per Tenant's door schedule. Rear service door shall be installed per tenant's door schedule. Door location and design to be approved by Tenant. FLOORS, Floor subgrade shall be constructed as shown on Tenant's Plans and left 4" below finish floor elevation. DRIVE-THRU Landlord shall furnish and install Drive-Thru Window per Tenant's Plans and specifications. Landlord shall furnish and install all curbs, gutters, bollards, and sidewalks around the building as required by Civil Drawings and local codes. Landlord shall furnish and install Menu Board Detector Loop in concrete pad with all associated concrete slab and curbing, Fiber mesh (No metal located within 36" of loop detector), and with power conduit stubbed back to the building and capped, all per Tenant's Plans. Landlord shall furnish and install data and power conduit stubbed outside building per Tenant's Plans for future use. Landlord shall furnish and install Clearance Bar foundation with thread and hook J bolts and steel base plate ready to receive Clearance Bar steel post, per Tenant's Plans and local codes. Landlord shall furnish and install all site Lighting (poles, lights, wiring) per Tenant's Plans and specifications, meeting Tenant's foot candle requirements at a minimum, or local municipality or local jurisdiction requirement if greater than Tenant's requirements. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING GRAPHICS 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 (p) 615.244.8170 (f) 615.244.8141 www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. WORK LETTER G2mO L M rn 75 (a) CO O N U C O M L 0 C M I..L N C U O 0 co to to L U) COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.5 Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code Project Title: Location: Climate Zone. Project Type Vertical Giszing , Wall Area: Construction Sile_ MontiKello. MN Additional Efficiency Package(s) 2015 IECC Panera Shell Monticello, Wmnesots 6a New Construction 16% Ciomeri'Agenl• Compton Associates ROOKWOOO TOWER 3805 EIYWARDS RD. STE.390 CINCINNATI, ON 45209 Credits: 1.0 Recluirad 10 Proposad Enhanoart Interior Lighting Controls, 1 0 c"dit Building Area Floor Area 1-Dining: CafetenalFast Food: Nonresidential `.1 Envelope Assemblies Assembly Roof I InsWtion Entirety Above Dock: High Albado Roof Required, (Bldg Use 1 - Dining: Caitetena'Fast Food( NORTH Extenor Wall a Wood-Frarnod, 19 o.c . (Bldg. Use 1 - Dinrg- CatelenalFast Food) Door 5 lry%Aatad Metal Swnging, (Bldg. Use 1 . Dining: Catiitana,Fast Food] EAU Exterior wall 2 Wood -Framed, t B' o.c-. (Bldg. Use 1 - Dicing. CafewnaiFast Food) Window 1 copy 1- Metal Frame Curtain WaIVSlorefronl, Pod. Specs.: Product ID Solarban 60, SHGC 0,38, PF 0 50. (Bldg. Use t - Dtnng- CafelenaiFasit Foodl lb) Window 1 copy 2- Metal Frame Curtain WaIllStorefront, Pod. Specs.: Product 10 Solarban 60, SHGC 0,38, (Bldg. Use 1 - Dining: CatewnaT-ast Food) Ib) SOUTH Exterior Wall 1: Wbod-Framed, Iro.c., (Bldg. Use 1 - Dr-ng Cafewna*ast Food) Window 1: Metal Frame Cvlain WaIIIStar frord, Ped Specs. Product ID Sdarban 60, SHGC 0,39, (Bldg, Use 1 - Dining: CatetarhaiFast Food] (b) DesigneOConeractor: Jeffrey Stahl MJM Architects 2948 Siidco Dr Nashville, TN 37204 615-244-8170 j.stahl@mjmarch_com Gross Area Cavity Cont. or R-Value R-Vatue Perimeter =4'4 -' I_ Proposed Budget L! U-Factor Factor. Jh j0.032 4iG _l i' 0.0 0.082 0.051 25 - 0.018 0.370 1115 21.0 0.0 0.062 0.051 70 0.290 0.360 114 0.290 0.360 366 21.0 0.0 0.062 0.051 105 --- •-• 0.290 0.360 Protect Title Panera Shell Report date: 04tO&24 Data filename: Z:LProiIectmaster%24114-CA Commercial Development-Monticello,MN-Panera124114 - Panera Page 1 of 9 Monticelb - COMcneck.cck Assembly Gross Area Cavity Cont. or R-Value R-Value Perimeter Window 1 copy 1- Metal Frame Curtain WaIllStorefront, Perf. Specs.: Produce~ ID Solarban 60, SHGC 0,38, PF 0 50, (Bldg. Use 1 - Dinng- CadelerlrvFea Food) Ib) Door 4: Gies 1' 50% glazing) -Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Produce~ 10 Solarban 60. SHGC 0,38, (Bldg. Use I - Dining: CerfelerWOFea Food) Ib) Exterior�Wall 4 Wood -Framed, 16' a.c ]Bldg. Use 1 - Oining- CalewnaiFast Food) Window 2 copy 1- Metal Frans Curtain WaIL Storefrord, Perf. Specs.: Product 10 Solarban 60, SHGC 0.38. PF 0 50. (Bldg Use 1 - Dinng- Ca lellertalFasl Food) Ib► Window 2 copy 2- Metal From Curtain Wall'Starefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Solarban 60, SHGC 0.38. (Bldg. Use I - Dining: CafewnaiFast Food) Ill �L 1091 46 84 Proposed Budget U• U-Factor Facton. 21.0 0.0 0.062 .. 0.290 ... ... 0.290 (a) Budgel Wactors are used for wftare basallne calculations ONLY, and we not code requrements (b) Fene irabon product perlormanoe must be coMW In accordanoe with NFRC and requires Supporting documentation. Envelope Compliance Statement 0.360 Compliance Statement. The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application the proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 2015 IECC requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.5 and to comply -with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist. Jeffrey Stahl - Client Manager-__ _- _ _�— 2024_04_08 ame - Title Signatu?.. ' Date Project Title Panera Shell Report date: 04l08,r24 Data filename ZAPropectmaster124114-CA Commercial Development-Monticello-MN-Ponera124114 - Panera Page 2 of 9 Monticello - COMcheck.cck ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. I DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. COMCHECK G300 Z ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1 It = 10'-0" ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AS1 mo 6" CONCRETE FILLED STEEL BOLLARD, BLACK SLOPE CONCRETE FOR DRAINAGE CONC. SIDEWALK - SEE SPECS 1/2" PREMOLDED JOINT - FILLER w/ SEALANT CRUSHED AGGREGATE 18" DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING FOR BOLLARD COMPACTED SUBGRADE BOLLARD DETAIL 3/4" = 1'-0" 8" SPLITFACE CMU 1/4" PLATE WELDED TO STEEL KNUCKLE AND GALVANIZED POST (3) HEAVY DUTY 180 DEGREE HINGES ENCLOSURE GATE HINGE 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 8" SPLITFACE CMU 1/4" PLATE WELDED TO STEEL KNUCKLE AND GALVANIZED POST (3) HEAVY DUTY 180 DEGREE HINGES 6" DIA. POST. PAINT BLACK FILL WITH CONCRETE. SET IN FOOTING FULL HEIGHT PAINTED METAL PANEL DOORS. BLACK 4" X 4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAME 3/4" J BOLT WELDED TO GATE 1" X 6" STEEL KNUCKLE 3" DIA. POST. PAINT BLACK FILL WITH CONCRETE. SET IN FOOTING + —FULL HEIGHT PAINTED METAL q� PANEL DOORS. BLACK 2" X 2" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAME 3/4" J BOLT WELDED TO GATE 1" X 6" STEEL KNUCKLE TRASH ENCLOSURE - ELEVATION SIDE Copy 1 3/8" = 1'-0" I ILPNV I VV 1 1 lIrNI) I LI\J TRASH ENCLOSURE - ELEVATION FRONT Copy 1 3/8" = 1'-0" 0 N in O N L vz-v EQ' 2'-6" 21-6" 3'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" EQ 1.- 2'-0" 18'-8" , 2'-0" 61 ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COMPTO ASSOCIA N TES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. I DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. SITE DETAILS ENCLOSURE MAN DOOR HINGE1 1 1/2" = 1'-0" Z TRASH ENCLOSURE - SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE - PLAN Copy 1 3/8" = 1'-0" AS1 ml L co U� 73 co O N U c O co (D c co N E E U O 0 co U) L a� U) TORQUE NUTS TO 5 FT. LBS. VERIFY FINAL SIGNAGE DESIGN, DIMENSIONS, AND DOUBLE NUT J Z SIGN FOUNDATION (GALV.) m o REQUIREMENTS WITH SIGN FLAT WASHERS 0 b VENDOR LEVELING NUT z O ry Q Z-8" AFTER POLE IS LEVELED & BOLTED `0 INTO PLACE, FILL ENTIRE AREA UNDER PLATE WITH STRUCTURAL NON -SHRINK, NON-METALLIC / CEMENTITIOUS GROUT. FOLLOW ALL OF THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL GROUT, MIXING, PLACEMENT, AND CURING. THE DISTANCE FROM THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION TO \ THE BOTTOM OF THE _ BASE PLATE TO BE 1 "-2" 0 \ 0 CV Q > DOUBLE NUTS AND FLAT WASHERS, BY G.C. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE BY OTHERS DISCONNECT SW4TGF (4) 1/2" DIA. X 24" ANCHOR BOLTS HANDHOLE W/ COVER w/ 4" THREAD @ TOP & 3" 5" THREAD @ BOTTOM, 1 (4) NUTS & (2) WASHERS o PER BOLT 1 - F- o o O CONDUIT TUBE � I d ° ° . ° = - INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS: \ -� ° d 1. STAKE FOUNDATION AREA & CONFIRM FINAL 1 1/2" CONDUIT BY G.C. GRADE REQUIREMENTS WITH G.C. / 2. EXCAVATE FOUNDATION AREA. r q j <4 3. SET ANCHOR BOLTS, REBAR & CONDUIT STUB. 'r / ° ° E5) #SPACED AL REBAR (PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BASE BY G.C. I a / ° DIA. 4. POUR CONCRETE. ALLOW CONCRETE CURE TIME AS ACIRCLE REQUIRED. 441 (3) 3 TIES IN THE TOP 5" 5. ANCHOR POLES AS SHOWN. CHECK FOR PLUMB. 12" O.C. THEREAFTER d 6. MOUNT SIGNAGE TO POLE(S). (INSTALLER TO d PROVIDE WIRE BETWEEN SIGN & BASE OF POLE.) 7. MAKE FINAL ELECTRICAL HOOK-UP. (ALL 10 ELECTRICAL TO MEET LOCAL CODES.) DIA. CORE 8. TEST SIGNAGE FOR PROPER FUNCTION & LIGHTING. FOUNDATION NOTE: 1'-6" DIA. 9. REMOVE ANY LIFTING BRACKETS & REINSTALL BOLTS. 4'-0" IS THE MINIMUM FOUNDATION DEPTH - 10. CLEANUP AREA & REMOVE ANY PACKING MATERIAL. REQUIRED FOR DESIGN LOADS. DEPTH MAY DO NOT DISCARD ANY MATERIAL OR DEBRIS INTO NEED TO BE INCREASED BASED ON LOCAL ON SITE DUMPSTERS. FROST DEPTH REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL n DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE1 1/2" = 1'-0" (2) 1/2" DIA. U-BOLTS-------- 1 3/4 X 1 3/4 X 1/8 ALUM TUBE -MATTE BLACK FINISH HSS5X5X1/4 - - PIPE - PAINTED MATTE BLACK (4) 3/4" DIA. X 30" LG. ANCHOR BOLTS W/6" THREAD @ TOP & 3" THREAD @ BOTTOM, (4) NUTS & (2) WASHERS PER BOLT (GRADE 36) - SEE DETAIL 7/A-404 -FINISHED GRADE d a d (4) #5 VERTICAL REBAR EQUALLY SPACED AROUND V-4" a DIA. CIRCLE W/ (3) #3 TIES IN TOP 5", 10" O.C. THEREAFTER d d as Q a FOUNDATION NOTE: DEPTH SHOWN IS THE MINIMUM FOUNDATION DEPTH REQUIRED FOR DESIGN LOADS. DEPTH MAY NEED TO BE INCREASED BASED ON LOCAL FROST DEPTH REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 5" 6-0" F.V. �OC Ls.] GCS o flo�flfl L5@ og g5h@T�o How aboa� Toarr QIFacik? 4'-6" rll� DIMENSION T.B.D. ON A PER SITE BASIS NOTE: VERIFY FINAL SIGNAGE DESIGN AND SIGN FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS WITH SIGN VENDOR NOTE: CLEARANCE ARM IS ADJUSTABLE AND CAN BE POSITIONED ANYWHERE ON THE VERTICAL POLE. Z-4" V-8" 8" (Ft'V1.9" (F.V.) d N a LL d J d dQ d d U a a a 4" CLR. TYP. n OVERHEAD CLEARANCE ARM 3/4" = 1'-0" V-4" DIA. CORE 2'-0" DIA. z O U w O tY a. CURB (FOR REFERENCE) FIELD VERIFY ACTUAL CURB TYPE DRIVE-THRU d a -- ALUMINUM PANEL WITH HINGE 7=;9 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS: 1. STAKE FOUNDATION AREA & CONFIRM FINAL GRADE REQUIREMENTS WITH G.C. 2. EXCAVATE FOUNDATION AREA. 3. SET ANCHOR BOLTS, REBAR & CONDUIT STUB. (PRIMARY Q ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BASE BY 7 }O G.C.) o ILL4. POUR CONCRETE. ALLOW U z w CONCRETE CURE TIME AS > REQUIRED. 5. ANCHOR POLE AS SHOWN. CHECK IQ FOR PLUMB. U _ 6. MOUNT SIGNAGE TO POLE. C° 7. TEST SIGNAGE FOR PROPER BID FUNCTION. 8. REMOVE ANY LIFTING BRACKETS & REINSTALL BOLTS. 9. CLEAN UP AREA & REMOVE ANY PACKING MATERIAL. DO NOT DISCARD ANY MATERIAL OR DEBRIS INTO ON SITE DUMPSTERS. DOUBLE NUTS (GALV.) TIGHTEN TOP NUT 1/6 TURN BEYOND HAND -TIGHT (MIN. 60", MAX 80^) FLAT WASHERS LEVELING NUT THE DISTANCE FROM THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BASE PLATE TO BE 1 "-2" BASEPL, w/SLOTT RADIAL I ELECTRI HOLE ANCHOF OVERTURNING DIRECTION NOTE: VERIFY FINAL SIGNAGE DESIGN AND SIGN FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS WITH SIGN VENDOR 1 1/2" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT STUB -UP STUB -UP: (1) 1 1/2" LOW VOLTAGE CONDUIT TO BLDG & (1) 1 1/2" SENSOR LOOP CONDUIT A 4:11W.WAIIIIIIIIII2 ANCHOR BOLT LOCATIONS (TYP. OF 4) DRIVE THRU SPEAKER CANOPY - ANCHOR BOLT 3/4" = 1'-0" 6 -0 - - VERIFY TOP ASSEMBLY IS COVERED 5" LIGHT FIXTURE 75W LED (2) HSS 6"x6"x3/8" � o W > FINISHED GRADE m d Q /'1 1/2" CONDUIT & 1" LOW VOLTAGE d CONDUIT TO BLDG. BY G.C. ° d d ° � a. a 2'-0" z O U w O IY EL i INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS: 1. STAKE FOUNDATION AREA & CONFIRM FINAL GRADE REQUIREMENTS WITH G.C. 2. EXCAVATE FOUNDATION AREA. 3. SET ANCHOR BOLTS, REBAR & CONDUIT STUB. (PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BASE BY G.C.) 4. POUR CONCRETE. ALLOW CONCRETE CURE TIME AS REQUIRED. 5. ANCHOR SPEAKER CANOPY AS SHOWN. CHECK FOR PLUMB. 6. MAKE FINAL ELECTRICAL HOOK-UP. (ALL ELECTRICAL TO MEET LOCAL CODES.) 7. TEST SPEAKER CANOPY FOR PROPER FUNCTION & LIGHTING. 8. REMOVE ANY LIFTING BRACKETS & REINSTALL BOLTS. 9. CLEAN UP AREA & REMOVE ANY PACKING MATERIAL. DO NOT DISCARD ANY MATERIAL OR DEBRIS INTO ON SITE DUMPSTERS. PREFORMED MAGNETIC wLOOP INDUCTION SYSTEM Sa CONCRETE PAVEMENT 2" MAX DEPTH TO LOOP LOOP SUPPORT N r - III„ " SAND AND GRAVEL BASE AT DRIVE THRU SPEAKER CANOPY/SENSOR LOOP LOCATION, RUN 1 1/2" CONDUIT (4) 3/4" DIA. x 30" LONG ANCHOR BOLTS in W/6" THREAD @ TOP & 3" THREAD @ BOTTOM, (4) NUTS & (2) WASHERS PER BOLT. (GRADE 36) - #5 REBAR @ 10" O.C., EACH WAY (FRONT & BACK) n DRIVE THRU SPEAKER CANOPY - SIDE & FRONT ELEVATION1 U 1 /2" = 1'-0" DOUBLE NUTS (GALV.) TIGHTEN TOP NUT 1/6 TURN BEYOND HAND -TIGHT (MIN. 60^, MAX 80^) FLAT WASHERS LEVELING NUT THE DISTANCE FROM THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BASE PLATE TO BE 1 "-2" 6'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-0" VERIFY FINAL SIGNAGE DESIGN, DIMENSIONS, AND SIGN FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS WITH SIGN VENDOR MICROPHONE & SPEAKER (SUPPLIED BY OTHERS) io in 120 VAC SUPPLY TO LED f ° POWER SUPPLY d SEE SIGNAGE PACKAGE d ° FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN ° REQUIREMENTS _ SPEAKER SUPPLY MICROPHONE SUPPLY d° d ° FOUNDATION NOTE: ° DEPTH MAY NEED TO BE INCREASED BASED ON LOCAL d FROST DEPTH REQUIREMENTS AND d n PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL 4° REPORT. 4'-0" CLEAR (TYP) ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COMPTO ASSOCIA N TES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. I DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. DRIVE THRU EQUIPMENT AS1 m2 -6" i. 5'-6" I. 5'-0" 5'-0" _ 5'-0" L 5'-0" 1 _ EQ I- EQ _ EQ SIDEWALK PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" FROST PROOF DS TO STORM UTILITY CONDUIT PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 15'-3" DS TO STORM F7 II II II io zo 1�3 --8 ,7'-5", - 14'-0" ` 0 01 _7, - TYP `• GW SS GAS ELECTRICAL 1" SPARE CONDUIT FROST PROOF HOSE BIB DOMESTIC WATER ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. SIDEWALK & UTILITY PLAN Z AS200 2 4 29'-11 3/4" 28'-10 1 /2" 1 24'-4 1 /4" 3'-10" V-9 I 2 A4.0 A5.2 I 3 D102 A I I I I / I/ I f I I /I I / I m U / I o I CO M I I Q 1 a m) I 00 L oo ° / co LO I / CLo V / I co I O 0 z / N W M I W co _ I z N � _ c c 00 / 28 -5 „ I I / A4.0 4 I I 2 A4.0 / I O B o 0? / O 3 o A5.1 O N I / C _ 4'-0" bo co m io / co q LO M 2 J M N A5.1 COMPACT THE EXPOSED SUB- I iv D — GRADE OF THE FLOOR TO A 13 CONDITION AND ELEVATION OF 4" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR I/ M U co rn ao iv 1 ih 7m_ A5.1 I O / I I O 101 F � O I C o 15'-8 3/4" 3'-4' 8'-7" 3'-4" 3 2 A5.0 A5.0 15'-8 3/4" 14'-1 3/4" 2 1 3 5 A4.0 n FLOOR PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. FLOOR PLAN Al mO 0 ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. I DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. ROOF PLAN A2mO Z ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A2ml n REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 3/16" = V-0" ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. I DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILS A300 1 2 \A/GATUFDDDnnr I_ r3) IF E 1 WEATHERPROOF J- A A5.0 BOX CENTERED @ ALL MTL-1 SIGN LOCATIONS FRONT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" WEATHERPROOF J- 4 BOX CENTERED @ ALL SIGN LOCATIONS MTL-1 1 REAR ELEVATION 3/16" = V-0" 2 2 5.2 1 - N O F F BR-3 BR-1 19'-01, MTL-1 SF-4 EQ_ EQ,, EQ EQ 01 • �" � - • . _ ,. � - ,• • , :. � .• • - � " •• . � ,. .• ; .� � � � . •• EIFS-1 � T' BR-3 BR-3 BR-1 BR-1 SIDE ELEVATION A 3/16" = 1'-0" SIDE ELEVATION B 3/16" = V-0" EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK MATERIAL MFG COLOR COMMENTS AWN-1 <varies> <varies> <varies> <varies> BR-1 THIN BRICK VENEER (SOLDIER BOND) MCNEAR BRICK & BLOCK SANTIAGO CREATIVE MATERIALS BLEND THIS PRODUCT COORDINATES WITH THE TABS SYSTEM. CREATIVE MATERIALS WILL BE COORDINATING. EXTERIOR: INSTALL BRICK USING LOW VOC HEAVY DUTY CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE. GROUT: LATICRETE, MVIS POINTING MORTAR 58 TERRACOTTA. DO NOT USE THE TABS SYSTEM IN THE INTERIOR PORTION ONLY. BR-3 THIN BRICK VENEER (SOLDIER BOND) ENDICOTT GOLDEN BUFF THIS PRODUCT COORDINATES WITH THE TABS SYSTEM. CREATIVE MATERIALS WILL BE COORDINATING. EXTERIOR: INSTALL BRICK USING LOW VOC HEAVY DUTY CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE. GROUT: LATICRETE, MVIS POINTING MORTAR 58 TERRACOTTA. DO NOT USE THE TABS SYSTEM IN THE INTERIOR PORTION ONLY. EIFS-1 DRAINABLE EIFS SYSTEM DRYVIT OR EQUAL MATCH DRYVIT - 105 - "SUEDE" TEXURE: LYMESTONE DPR. USE ULTRA HIGH IMPACT MESH ASSEMBLY WITH DRYVIT PANZER 20 MESH FOR ALL EIFS WALL AREAS WITHIN 8'0" OF GRADE. MTL-1 PRE -FINISHED METAL 2- PIECE SNAP -ON DUROLAST OR EQ DARK BRONZE COMPRESSION COPING SF-1 ALUMINUM WOOD LOOK, SELF MATING KNOTWOOD WHITE ASH CLADDING SYSTEM SF-4 FRP; PATTERN: CUSTOM PATTERN; SURFACE: NICHIHA MATCH PMS 2307 C FINISH: GREEN TOWER CLADDING. HANDCRAFTED FLUTE; PAINT TYPE: GEL COAT MATTE STF-1 ALUMINUM AND GLASS STOREFRONT FRAME KAWNEER OR EQUAL DARK BRONZE ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. ELEVATIONS A4.0 X COLOR - FRONT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" n COLOR - REAR ELEVATION 3/16" = V-0" COLOR - SIDE ELEVATION A 3/16" = V-0" OCOLOR - SIDE ELEVATION B 3/16" = V-0" EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK MATERIAL MFG COLOR COMMENTS AWN-1 <varies> <varies> <varies> <varies> BR-1 THIN BRICK VENEER (SOLDIER BOND) MCNEAR BRICK & BLOCK SANTIAGO CREATIVE MATERIALS BLEND THIS PRODUCT COORDINATES WITH THE TABS SYSTEM. CREATIVE MATERIALS WILL BE COORDINATING. EXTERIOR: INSTALL BRICK USING LOW VOC HEAVY DUTY CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE. GROUT: LATICRETE, MVIS POINTING MORTAR 58 TERRACOTTA. DO NOT USE THE TABS SYSTEM IN THE INTERIOR PORTION ONLY. BR-3 THIN BRICK VENEER (SOLDIER BOND) ENDICOTT GOLDEN BUFF THIS PRODUCT COORDINATES WITH THE TABS SYSTEM. CREATIVE MATERIALS WILL BE COORDINATING. EXTERIOR: INSTALL BRICK USING LOW VOC HEAVY DUTY CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE. GROUT: LATICRETE, MVIS POINTING MORTAR 58 TERRACOTTA. DO NOT USE THE TABS SYSTEM IN THE INTERIOR PORTION ONLY. EIFS-1 DRAINABLE EIFS SYSTEM DRYVIT OR EQUAL MATCH DRYVIT - 105 - "SUEDE" TEXURE: LYMESTONE DPR. USE ULTRA HIGH IMPACT MESH ASSEMBLY WITH DRYVIT PANZER 20 MESH FOR ALL EIFS WALL AREAS WITHIN 8'0" OF GRADE. MTL-1 PRE -FINISHED METAL 2- PIECE SNAP -ON DUROLAST OR EQ DARK BRONZE COMPRESSION COPING SF-1 ALUMINUM WOOD LOOK, SELF MATING KNOTWOOD WHITE ASH CLADDING SYSTEM SF-4 FRP; PATTERN: CUSTOM PATTERN; SURFACE: NICHIHA MATCH PMS 2307 C FINISH: GREEN TOWER CLADDING. HANDCRAFTED FLUTE; PAINT TYPE: GEL COAT MATTE STF-1 ALUMINUM AND GLASS STOREFRONT FRAME KAWNEER OR EQUAL DARK BRONZE ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. COLOR ELEVATIONS A4.1 F E F E 5 PRE -FINISHED METAL 2-PIECE PRE -FINISHED METAL 2-PIECE PRE -FINISHED METAL 2-PIECE SNAP -ON COMPRESSION SNAP -ON COMPRESSION SNAP -ON COMPRESSION COPING BY DURO-LAST. COPING BY DURO-LAST. I I 19'-01, 1 I I A6.0 I I I I LULL_J PEEL AND STICK Ifl I i DURO-LAST SINGLE PLY CLASS 'C' MOISTURE BARRIER ON ROOF MEMBRANE OVER R-25 4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING RIGID INSULATION. MEMBRANE TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY UP WALL AND TERMINATE UNDER COPING NICHIHA FRP SYSTEM OVER 2" RIGID INSULATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION W/ 18GA Z-FURRING @ 3'-0" OC HORIZONTALLY (INSULATION WILL BE BETWEEN Z-FURRING) 2x6 WD STUD WALL W/ R-21 BATT INSULATION. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION h 12'-3" 8.2„ 5'-0" PEEL AND STICK MOISTURE BARRIER ON PLYWOOD SHEATHING NICHIHA FRP SYSTEM OVER 2" RIGID INSULATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION W/ 18GA Z-FURRING @ 3'-0" OC HORIZONTALLY (INSULATION WILL BE BETWEEN Z-FURRING) 2x6 WD STUD WALL W/ R-21 BATT INSULATION. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I 4 TABS BRICK VENEER WALL I A6.0 SYSTEM. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS T-E-H111 — -_J SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE SIDEWALK, REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS 0 Zh `p 8' ° ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. WALL SECTIONS n WALL SECTION J 3/4" = 1'-0" n WALL SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" n WALL SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" A5mO 0 1 PRE -FINISHED METAL 2-PIECE SNAP -ON COMPRESSION COPING BY DURO-LAST. PEEL AND STICK MOISTURE BARRIER ON PLYWOOD SHEATHING NICHIHA FRP SYSTEM OVER 2" RIGID INSULATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION W/ 18GA Z-FURRING @ 3'-0" OC HORIZONTALLY (INSULATION WILL BE BETWEEN Z-FURRING) 2x6 WD STUD WALL W/ R-21 BATT INSULATION. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 5'-0" Ir M11 TABS BRICK VENEER WALL SYSTEM. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE CURB, REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS J� WALL SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" —DURO-LAST SINGLE PLY CLASS 'C' ROOF MEMBRANE OVER R-25 4" RIGID INSULATION. MEMBRANE TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY UP WALL AND TERMINATE UNDER COPING PRE -FINISHED METAL 2-PIECE SNAP -ON COMPRESSION COPING BY DURO-LAST. PREFINISHED METAL COLLECTION BOX I PREFINISHED METAL DOWNSPOUT PEEL AND STICK MOISTURE BARRIER ON PLYWOOD SHEATHING ALUMINUM WOOD LOOK, SELF MATING CLADDING SYSTEM OVER 2" RIGID INSULATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION W/ 18GA Z-FURRING @ 3'-0" OC HORIZONTALLY (INSULATION WILL BE BETWEEN Z-FURRING) 2x6 WD STUD WALL W/ R-21 BATT INSULATION. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TABS BRICK VENEER WALL SYSTEM. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION 0 I M DOWNSPOUT TO DRAIN TO STORM SYSTEM WALL SEC 3/4" = 1'-0" I 2 DURO-LAST SINGLE PLY CLASS 'C' ROOF MEMBRANE OVER R-25 4" RIGID INSULATION. MEMBRANE TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY UP WALL AND TERMINATE UNDER COPING T PRE-FINISHED METAL 2-PIECE SNAP -ON COMPRESSION COPING BY DURO-LAST. PEEL AND STICK MOISTURE BARRIER ON PLYWOOD SHEATHING ALUMINUM WOOD LOOK, SELF MATING CLADDING SYSTEM OVER 2" RIGID INSULATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION W/ 18GA Z-FURRING @ 3'-0" OC HORIZONTALLY (INSULATION WILL BE BETWEEN Z-FURRING) 2x6 WD STUD WALL W/ R-21 BATT INSULATION. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 12'-3" PREFINISHED METAL "EYEBROW" OVER STOREFRONT 10'-0" 901 TABS BRICK VENEER WALL SYSTEM. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION I WALL SECTION 3/4" = 1'-011 2 ----------� Fftr DUMQ7AST SINGLE PLY CLASS'C' \ROf` MEMBRANE OVER R-25 4" RIGID INSULATION. MEMBRANE TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY UP WALL AND TERMINATE UNDER COPING W��rrrrr��„ e I 6 I A6.0 i I � A6.0 I I ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. WALL SECTIONS A5m 1 PRE -FINISHED METAL 2-PIECE SNAP -ON COMPRESSION COPING BY DURO-LAST. PEEL AND STICK MOISTURE BARRIER ON PLYWOOD SHEATHING 3" DRAINABLE EIFS SYSTEM CONT. RIGID INSULATION W/ 18GA Z-FURRING @ 3'-0" OC HORIZONTALLY (INSULATION WILL BE BETWEEN Z-FURRING) 2x6 WD STUD WALL W/ R-21 BATT INSULATION. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION — STEEL LADDER W/ SECURITY GATE. PAINT TO MATCH EIFS-1 TABS BRICK VENEER WALL SYSTEM. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE SIDEWALK, REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS 0 0 E. F G 0 0 0 C. X. E. F 0 DURO-LAST SINGLE PLY CLASS 'C' ROOF MEMBRANE OVER R-25 4" RIGID INSULATION. MEMBRANE TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY UP WALL AND TERMINATE UNDER COPING PRE -FINISHED METAL 2-PIECE SNAP -ON COMPRESSION COP'AIn o\/ rll 1Mf-% I nOr PEE MOI PLY OLD COI, 18G HOF WIL 2x6 BAT STR ADC 0_1 TAB SYS MAI, SPE COI, 2 'C' > 4" TO ND NG ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. WALL SECTIONS WALL SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" Z WALL SECTION 3/411 = 1'-0" A5m2 PREFINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE FASCIA COVER, ATTACHED TO F.R.T. WOOD BLOCKING S.S. FASTENER PER MANUF. RECOMMENDATIONS NICHIHA FRP SYSTEM OVER 2" RIGID INSULATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. OSection 1 - Callout 1 1 1/2" = 1'-0" NICHIHA FRP SYSTEM OVER 2" RIGID INSULATION. NSTALL PER MFGS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT FLASHING AND SEALANT PER MFGS SPECIFICATIONS. COLOR TO MATCH NICHIHA 3'-0" TABS BRICK VENEER WALL SYSTEM OVER CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION INSTALL PER MFGS SPECIFICATIONS. Section 1 - Callout 2 3" = 1'-0" SUBSILL FLASHING PER STOREFRONT MFG ^r^" SLOPE BRICK 1/4"/3" TABS BRICK VENEEF SYSTEM. INSTALL PE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSU n Section 3 - Callout 3 1 1/2" = 1'-0" WATERPROOF MASTIC SEALANT, AS REQ'D. BY MANUF. EXTR. GR. PLYWD. BLOCKING, TAPERED AS REQ'D TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE. ATTACH W/ 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS, EMBEDDED 8", EVERY 4'-0" STAGGERED ROOF MEMBRANE SYSTEM FULLY ADHERED UP & OVER TOP OF PARAPET; SECURE TO WOOD NAILER - SEE ROOF PLAN FOR MORE INFO 5/8" SHEATHING 2x6 WOOD STUD PREFINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE FASCIA COVER, ATTACHED TO F.R.T. WOOD BLOCKING S.S. FASTENER PER MANUF. RECOMMENDATIONS ALUMINUM WOOD LOOK, SELF MATING CLADDING SYSTEM OVER 2" RIGID INSULATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. OSection 3 - Callout 1 1 1/2" = 1'-0" NICHIHA FRP SYST OVER 2" RIGID INSi INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 2x6 WD STUD WAL BATT INSULATION. 5 Section 2.1 - Callout 1 1 1/2" = 1'-0" ALUMINUM WOOD LOOK, SELF MATING CLADDING SYSTEM OVER 2" RIGID INSULATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. SS FLASHING PER MFG SPECS OL 3'-0" TABS BRICK VENEER WALL SYSTEM. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION n Section 4 - Callout 1 1 1/2" = 1'-0" WATERPROOF MASTIC SEALANT, AS REQ'D. BY MANUF. EXTR. GR. PLYWD. BLOCKING, TAPERED AS REQ'D TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE. ATTACH W/ 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS, EMBEDDED 8", EVERY 4'-0" STAGGERED ROOF MEMBRANE SYSTEM FULLY ADHERED UP & OVER TOP OF PARAPET; SECURE TO WOOD NAILER - SEE ROOF PLAN FOR MORE INFO 5/8" SHEATHING 2x6 WOOD STUD PREFINISHED METAL DP` rnr r FASCIA COVER, ATTACI- F.R.T. WOOD BLOCKING S.S. FASTENER PER MAI RECOMMENDATIONS 3" DRAINABLE EIFS SYE OSection 6 - Callout 1 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 2x6 WOOD STUD ALUMINUM WOOD LOOK, CLADDING SYSTEM OVER INSULATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIF CONT FLASHING AND SEA PER MFGS SPECIFICATIOI` COLOR TO MATCH SIDING PREFINISHED METAL "EYEBROW" OVER STOREI BACKER ROD AND SEALAI` BOTH SIDES, TYP. Section 3 - Callout 2 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 3" DRAINABLE EIFS SYSTEM SS FLASHING PER MFG SPECS EC415:3Y TABS BRICK VENEER WALL SYSTEM. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONT. 2" RIGID INSULATION n Section 6 - Callout 2 1 1/2" = 1'-0" "'",TERPROOF MASTIC SEALANT, AS REQ'D. BY MANUF. EXTR. GR. PLYWD. BLOCKING, PERED AS REQ'D TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE. ATTACH W/ 1/2" NCHOR BOLTS, EMBEDDED 8", EVERY 4'-0" STAGGERED ROOF MEMBRANE SYSTEM FULLY ADHERED UP & OVER FOP OF PARAPET; SECURE TO WOOD NAILER - SEE ROOF PLAN FOR MORE INFO 5/8" SHEATHING 2x6 WOOD STUD n FLASHING AT WALL 1./ 3" = 1'-0" ROOF MEMBRANE CONTINUES UP AND OVER PARAPET, SECURE TO NAILER BONDING ADHESIVE MEMBRANE MUST EXTEND 1/2" BEYOND HD (HD PLUS) SEAM PLATE FASTENER AND HD OR HD PLUS SEAM PLATE AT 12" O.C. MAX. WELDED SPLICE ROOF MEMBRANE BONDING ADHESIVE RIGID INSULATION STEEL DECK POSITION PLATE 1/2" MIN. ABOVE FINISHED ROOF STEEL ANGLE, SEE STRUCTURAL ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 615.244.8170 ENGINEERING ((f) 615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com COM PTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN CHECK SET 04.02.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. DETAILS A600 1.0 DESIGN AND CODE INFORMATION 1.1 The Structure is designed based on the 2020 Minnesota Building Code. All Design, Materials and Workmanship shall conform to the Referenced Code(s). Components designed by Suppliers shall be designed in accordance with the Referenced Code(s). 1.2 The lateral force resisting system(s) (shear walls, moment frames, etc.), truss attachment, and completed attachment of the roof diaphragms (decking) are required for the lateral stability of the completed structure. 1.3 Superimposed Loading for Mechanical Units are based on the Weight of the Equipment as indicated on the Structural Drawings. Any change in Type, Location, Size or Number of Pieces of Equipment shall be reported to the Architect for verification of the adequacy of supporting members prior to the placement of equipment. 1.4 Roof Dead Loads: - Roofing 2.0 psf - Insulation 2.0 psf - Deck 2.0 psf - Ceiling 3.0 psf - Framing 5.0 psf -M/E/P/FP 6.0psf 1.5 Structural Roof Members are designed for Minimum Roof Live Loads (Lr) based on the following Tributary loaded areas: - Lr = 20 Ri R2 psf Where: Rl = 1 For At < 200 psf 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.12 1.13 1.14 Ri = 1.2 - 0.001 At For 200 < At < 600 psf Ri = 0.6 For At > 600 psf The Roof Framing System has been designed with the Assumption that a Drainage System adequate to prevent ponding will be provided. Snow Loads: Distribution Coefficients shall be applied to the Base Load as Required by the Building Code, where: - Pg = 50 psf The Structure and its Components are designed for Wind Loads as defined by the Building Code, where: - Basic Wind Speed (3 second gust): 109 mph (Ultimate) 84.4 mph (Nominal) - Wind Importance Factor: II= 1.00 - Risk Category: II - Wind Exposure: C - Internal Pressure Coefficient: +0.18/-0.18 - Velocity Pressure: qh = 22.1 psf (Ultimate) -Design Wind Pressure Components and Cladding: (Ultimate) LOCATION ZONE EFFECTIVE WIND AREA DESIGN WIND PRESSURE (SF) (PSF) ROOF 1 10 +16.0 -42.0 20 +16.0 -39.0 50 +16.0 -3S.S 100 +16.0 -32.S 1' 10 +16.0 -24.0 20 +16.0 -24.0 50 +16.0 -24.0 100 +16.0 -24.0 2 10 +16.0 -SS.0 20 +16.0 -S1.S 50 +16.0 -47.0 100 +16.0 -43.S 3 10 +16.0 -7S.0 20 +16.0 -68.0 50 +16.0 -S8.S 100 +16.0 -S1.S WALLS 4 10 +24.0 -26.0 20 +23.0 -2S.0 50 +21.S -23.S 100 +20.S -22.S 500 +18.0 -20.0 5 10 +24.0 -32.0 20 +23.0 -30.0 50 +21.S -27.0 100 +20.S -2S.0 500 +18.0 20.0 h = 15.7' - Design Wind Pressures - Plus and Minus signs signify pressure acting Toward and Away from Exterior Surface. - Linear Interpolation between values of Tributary Area is permissible. The Structure is designed using the following Earthquake Load Data: - Risk Category: II - Site Class D (ASSUMED) - Seismic Design Category: B - Mapped Spectral Response Accelerations: Ss = 0.050g S1 = 0.023g - Design Spectral Response Coefficients: SIDS = 0.054g SDI = 0.037g - Basic Seismic -Force -Resisting System: Light Frame Wood Walls with Structural Wood Shear Panels And Steel Not Detailed for Seismic Resistance - Seismic Response Coefficient, Cs: 0.018 - Response Modification Factor, R: 3 - Analysis Procedure: Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure The Structural Engineer will Observe the Construction only as requested by the Architect as Specified in the Architect -Engineer Agreement for the Project. Field Observation required by the Project Specifications or the Building Code must be performed by a Qualified Field Observer Approved by the Architect. Design Loads for Handrails are as follows: A.) 200 lb Concentrated Load applied at any point and in any direction. B.) 50 plf applied in any direction. Design Loads for Guardrails are as follows: A.) 200 lb Concentrated Load applied at any point and in any direction, at the Top of Guardrail. B.) 50 plf applied Horizontally and a Simultaneous Load of 100 plf applied Vertically Downward at the top of the Guardrail. C.) 200 lb Concentrated Horizontal Load applied on a one (1) foot square area at any point in the system. D.) Guardrails subject to Vehicular Impact shall be Designed to resist a 10 kip load applied (18) inches Above Floor Level. - These Loads are Not to be applied Simultaneously, but each shall be applied to produce Maximum Stresses in each of the respective Handrail Components. The Contractor is Responsible to Coordinate the Construction and Erection of Steel Frames, Steel Joists and Steel Decking to ensure Compatibility of Roof Systems and Wall Systems when considering Pitch and Camber of Steel Joists. The Owner and Architect shall examine the Structure and inform the Structural Engineer in writing, of any Loads not listed above. No Reserve Live Load Capacity exists for Conversion to other uses, if not noted above. STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES 2.0 ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES AND DEFINITIONS 5.0 CONCRETE 2.1 Shop drawings shall not be reviewed for approval unless checked by the fabricator and approved by the contractor, as indicated by the inclusion of the contractor's submittal review stamp.Submit one high quality PDF 5.1 All Concrete Workmanship and Materials shall conform to ACI 318 and All Local Codes, Laws and Ordinances. for review. Only marked up PDF will be returned. Reproduction of contract documents for shop drawings will not be permitted or accepted. See specifications and general notes for additional requirements. 5.2 The following Table shall apply to All Concrete Mix Designs to be used for this Project: Submittals required to be submitted for review include but are not limited to: -Roof trusses -Structural steel framing -Concrete Mix -Rebar (placement and material data) 2.2 The contractor shall provide 10 working days in his schedule for the Structural Engineer's review of each submittal. Diaphragms are Required for the Lateral Stability of the Completed Structure. 2.3 It is the Contractor's responsibility to certify that he has not made changes to specified materials on submittals. 2.4 The contractor shall insure that all construction loads do not exceed the design live loads indicated on the structural drawings and that these loads are not put on the structural members prior to the time that all framing members and their connections are in place. 2.5 Contractor shall verify and bear the expense of verifying all existing conditions, horizontal and vertical dimensions and coordination of Architectural and Structural drawings. Immediately notify the Architect of any discrepancies. For dimensions not shown on Structural Drawings, see the Architectural Drawings. 2 6 D' h ' d' t f h' h b St t II Ad t Tint t In II COORDINATE Imenslons s own In Ica a spans Or w IC mum erS are i uC ura y equa U. e con I0C or s a TYPE OF MIN. COMP. MAXIMUM CONSTRUCTION STRENGTH AT TOTAL AIR W/C RATIO SLUMP (in.) 28 DAYS (psi) FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATION 4000 NOT REQ'D. 0.50 4-6 WALLS INTERIOR NOT SLAB -ON -GRADE SEE PLANS ENTRAINED 0.50 3-5 RETAINING WALLS OR CONCRETE EXPOSED 4000 5 - 7% 0.50 4-6 TO WEATHER ALL OTHER 3000 AS REQ'D. 0.58 4-6 CONCRETE AND CONFIRM ALL DIMENSIONS. Contractor shall include in his bid the Costs of Dimensional Coordination and 5.3 Confirmation. These Documents constitute a performance specification. Coordinate all openings, support systems, duct work locations, mechanical elements, sprinklers, etc., with Structural elements. Consult the Engineer/Architect and obtain Approval PRIOR TO making changes to Structural Systems. 2.7 These Drawings and Specifications are performance specifications. Provide all labor, materials, equipment and services 5.4 required to execute and complete all items of work as shown or indicated on the drawings and as specified in this section, including incidental items to effect a finished and complete job, even though such items are not shown or particularly 5.5 mentioned on the Contract Documents. 2.8 The Contractor shall compare the Structural Sections with the Architectural Sections and report any discrepancies to the 5.6 Architect PRIOR TO fabricating or installing Structural Members. 2.9 See Architectural Drawings or Specifications for any fireproofing requirements of structural members. 5.7 2.10 The design, adequacy and safety of erection bracing, shoring, temporary supports, etc., is the Sole Responsibility of the 5.8 Contractor. 2.11 Erection and bracing of steel structures shall comply with the limits and recommendations of the "Code of Standard 5.9 Practice", Latest edition of the American Institute of Steel Construction. Provide bracing wherever necessary to take care of all loads to which the structure may be subjected, including equipment and the operation of the same. 5.10 2.12 The details shown on the Structural Drawings designated as "Typical Details" apply generally to the drawings in all areas where conditions are similar to those described in the details. 2.13 Notes on the Structural General Notes sheet are applicable unless specifically noted otherwise on the drawings. 5.11 2.14 Principal openings are shown on the drawings. See Architectural, Mechanical and Electrical drawings for sleeves, curbs, 5.12 inserts and other openings not shown. The contractor shall provide for all openings, whether shown on the Structural Drawings or not. Size and location of all openings shall be verified with the mechanical and electrical contractors. Any 5.13 d' t' f h th St t I D h II b b ht t th E' ' tt t' f A I Grout used in under column base plates shall be cement based, non -shrink, non-metallic grout. the grout shall exhibit no shrinkage in accordance with ASTM C827, "Test Method for Early Volume Change of Cementitious Mixtures" and shall have a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 5000 psi when tested in accordance with ASTM C109, "Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars". Provide entrained air as per ACI 318. Where excess water is added to the concrete so that its serviceability is degraded, the attainment of required strength shall not release the contractor from providing such modifications as may be required by the architect to provide a serviceable member. All concrete shall be vibrated. No repair or rubbing of concrete surfaces shall be made prior to inspection by and with approval of the architect (owner or his authorized representative). Sawn control joint in slab -on -grade shall be cut in accordance with ACI 302.1 R. Joints shall be cut within 12 hours of slab placement. The length -to -width ratios of slab areas shall not exceed 1.25. The maximum area of slab within joints shall be 225 s.f. Provide concrete walls with dovetail anchors and anchor slots where masonry walls abut concrete surface. Control joints in all foundation and retaining walls shall be placed not more than 20 feet apart and shall have 3/4 inch v-chamfers on each side. Construction joints shall be placed not more than 100 feet apart and shall fall at control joint locations. Construction joints shall be keyed. Discontinue wall reinforcing at control joints. use 1/2" diameter x 3'-0" smooth bars at 12" c/c centered in the wall. Expansion joints shall be spaced at 150 feet. See details on the drawings. All pipe penetrations through slabs shall be sleeved in conformance with ACI 318, Section 6.3. Refer to Civil Drawings for site concrete. Refer to Drawings of other Disciplines and Vendor Drawings for embedded items and recesses not shown on Structural Drawings evla Ion rom openings s own on a ruc ura rawings s a e roug o e nglneers a en Ion or pprova PRIOR TO fabrication or installation of Structural Members. 2.15 Investigate Actual locations of underground lines and utilities BEFORE excavating and advise the Architect of all interferences. 6.0 STRUCTURAL STEEL AND METAL FORM / DECK 3.0 FOUNDATION 3.1 The foundation design is based on the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical report by: Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 6.1 All structural steel work shall conform to the code referenced edition of the "Specification for Structural Steel Buildings" of the AISC (AISC Project Number: R0045058.00 360). Dated: March 26, 2024 Contact: Eric Hansen, PE 6.2 All structural steel, except for plates, angles, channels, pipe and tubing (HSS), shall conform to ASTM A992, Grade 50 (Fy=50 ksi). Phone Number: (888) 937-5150 6.3 Structural steel plates, angles and channels shall conform to ASTM A36. 3.2 Assumed safe bearing capacities listed below shall be confirmed in the field by a Registered Geotechnical Engineer, approved by The Architect. 6.4 Steel pipe shall conform to ASTM A53, Grade B. Continuous Footings 2000 P.S.F Isolated Spread Footings 2000 P.S.F. 6.5 Square and rectangular structural tubing (HSS) shall conform to ASTM A500, Grade C (Fy=50 ksi). 3.3 All foundations shall bear a minimum of 48" below finish grade. 6.6 Anchor bolts shall be ASTM F1554 headed bolts. 3.4 Foundations are designed to bear on firm Remolded & Recompacted earth or approved controlled fill. Where 6.7 All bolted connections shall be made with 3/4 inch diameter ASTM A325 bolts, unless noted otherwise. unacceptable material occurs, Excavate and Replace with Engineered Fill. Fill material shall extend 10'-0" (Coordinate with Geotech Recommendations) beyond exterior boundary of building or a distance equal to the 6.8 The structural steel fabricator shall be responsible for the design of all connections not detailed on the drawings. The fabricator shall provide footing bearing depth, whichever is greater. certification by a registered professional engineer in the project state that the connection design is in accordance with all applicable codes and specifications. 3.5 Proof -Roll the areas under the structure in accordnace with the geotechnical report. Repair soft areas in accordance with the geotechnical report. 6.10 Fabrication and erection shall be done by steel fabricator and erector who have been certified by the aisc quality certification program, category CnBg, or have an independent testing laboratory approved by the architect certify that the fabrication procedures used in this work 3.6 Where compacted earth fill is shown on the Contract Documents, it shall be placed in strict accordance with the are in accordance with AISC specifications and these requirements. geotechnical report. Fill materials shall be placed and compacted in accordance with the geotechnical report. 6.11 Welding shall be done by certified welders using ASTM E70 series electrodes for shop welding A36 steel, and E70 series low hydrogen 3.7 No footing shall bear directly on rock. Where rock is closer than (2) feet from the bottom of the footing, it shall be electrodes for all welding of high strength steels and for all field welding. undercut to a minimum of (2) feet below the footings and replaced by Engineered Fill. Conform to Project Specifications. When Foundation Bearing Stratum transitions from soil to rock, notify the Architect for special 6.12 Welds shown on structural drawings are minimum design requirements. The fabricator's shop drawings shall reflect welds in accordance transition instructions. with AWS requirements. 3.8 Foundation or Retaining Walls shall be backfilled with stone conforming to ASTM D448, Size 6. 6.13 A minimum representative sampling of 10% of all fillet welds by each welder shall be visually inspected. 3.9 Foundation Walls not designed as Cantilevered from the footing, shall not be backfilled until shored or permanently supported at top of wall. 6.14 A representative sampling of full penetration groove welds shall be inspected by ultrasonic testing. Twenty-five percent of the welds by each welder shall be inspected. See specifications for additional requirements. 3.10 Lateral Design soil pressure for Basement Walls is 50 pcf, with an additional surcharge as required. 6.15 When welds are not called -out on drawings, they are minimum size continuous fillet welds in accordance with AWS D1.1. Fillet welds not 3.11 Lateral Design soil pressure for Cantilevered Retaining Walls is 35 pcf, with an additional surcharge as required. specified as to length shall be continuous. 3.12 Provide a drain system for Foundation and Retaining Walls that are a part of the Structure. 6.16 All groove welds shall be full penetration. 3.13 Provide 2" diameter Weep Holes at 4'-0" o.c. Maximum in Exterior Retaining Walls. Provide Filter Fabric over the 6.17 Provide fillet welds at all contact joints between steel members sufficient to develop the allowable tensile strength of the smaller member at Weep Hole to retain the backfill material. the joint. 3.14 Where foundation excavations must remain open and are subject to rain, undercut the excavation and install a (3) 6.18 Metal form deck and roof deck shall be continuous over three (3) spans and installed in accordance with the manufacturer's inch thick Mud Mat of 2500 psi concrete to protect the bearing soils. recommendations. See specifications for additional requirements. 4.0 REINFORCEMENT 6.19 Metal deck is designed for uniform loads on the spans shown. No concentrated point or line loads shall be induced on metal deck. 4.1 Reinforcing Bars shall conform to ASTM A615, Grade 60. Welded Wire Fabric shall conform to ASTM A185. 4.2 Detailing of Concrete Reinforcement and Accessories shall be in accordance with ACI "Detailing Manual", SP- 6.20 The contractor is responsible for the provision of a method to transfer gravity and lateral loads from non-structural items occurring between 66, the CRSI "Manual of Standard Practice" and ACI 318. structural framing to adjacent framing members. If structural framing consists of joists or joist girders, special provisions apply. See steel 4.3 Reinforcing shall Not be Heated or Welded. joist and joist girder notes for further information. 4.4 Reinforcing Placement shall be Approved by the Architect or His/Her Authorized Representative before Concrete is Placed. 6.21 Coordinate all openings and dimensions with Architectural and Mechanical drawings. Field confirm all dimensions. 4.5 Provide the following Concrete Cover for Reinforcement (Exposed Members are Members Exposed to Weather or Earth in Service): 622 Protect all steel below grade by encasing in concrete or painting with bitumastic paint MARK NOT EXPOSED EXPOSED CAST AGAINST EARTH BEAMS 1-1/2" 1-1/2" --- FOOTINGS --- 2" 3" WALLS - #5 OR SMALLER 3/4" 1 1/2" --- WALLS - #6 OR LARGER 3/4" 2" --- 4.6 Reinforcement for Slabs -On -Grade shall be as noted on the drawings. 4.7 Masonry Reinforcement shall be placed in the Center of the Wall, Unless Specifically Detailed Otherwise in these Drawings. 4.8 Bars designated Continuous or Bars required to be Spliced for Placement, shall be Lapped as follows: - Concrete Reinforcement: Class "B" Tension Lap - Masonry Reinforcement: 4.9 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 MASONRY LAP SPLICE LENGTH BAR SIZE #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 8" CMU 36" 45" 54" 63" 72" 12" CMU 36" 45" 54" 63" 72" - Lap Splices in Bottom Bars shall occur at a Support. - Lap Splices in Top Steel shall occur at Mid Span. Openings in Concrete Slabs and Walls shall be Reinforced on each side of the Opening with Two (2) #6 Bars in each face. Bars shall extend (2) feet Beyond opening. Provide Two (2) #4 Diagonal Bars 4'-0" long in each face All Re -Entrant Corners of Slabs and Walls. Welded Wire Fabric (WWF) shall lap Two (2) Full Meshes and be Securely Wired at Each Side and End. Welded Wire Fabric shall be Fabricated from Sheets. Rolls are Not Allowed. Provide Corner Bars at All Wall and Bond Beam Corners. Bars shall be the same size and spacing as Horizontal Reinforcing in each direction. Intersecting Walls, if Poured separately, shall be Keyed and Doweled together with Bars of same size and spacing as Horizontal Reinforcement. 6.23 6.24 6.26 6.27 6.28 6.29 Galvanizing of steel members shall conform to ASTM A123. Headed studs used in fabrication of embedded assemblies in concrete shall conform to ASTM A108 and shall be welded to those assemblies using a full fusion process. Hardened washers shall be installed over short slotted or oversize holes occurring in the outer ply of a connection. A plate washer of at least 5/16 inch thickness with standard holes shall be installed over long slotted holes occurring in an outer ply of a connection. Base plate connections are not designed to provide stability of columns during erection. Columns shall be temporarily braced by the erector prior to release of the column from the hoisting equipment. Steel encased in concrete shall not be painted. Column anchor bolt holes shall be oversized in accordance with AISC "Manual of Steel Construction, Volume II, Connections". 7.0 MASONRY 7.1 All Masonry Construction shall comply with ACI 530, "Building Code Requirements for Concrete Masonry Structures". 7.2 Masonry for this Structure has designed in Accordance with the Referenced Code as Inspected Masonry. The Owner shall employ an Agent in Compliance with Code Criteria to insure that the Code requirements are carried out. Inspection and Testing shall conform to ACI 530 Section 1.5. 7.3 Minimum Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry at 28 days shall be F'm = 2,000 psi. All Load Bearing block masonry shall have a minimum Net Area unit strength of 2,000 psi at 28 days. 7.4 Concrete Masonry Units shall conform to ASTM C90 or ASTM C55 and be sampled and tested in Accordance with ASTM C140. 7.5 Bed Joint thickness shall not exceed 5/8". 7.6 Grout used for filling Cells and Bond Beams shall comply with ASTM C476 and shall have a Minimum Compressive Strength of 2,000 psi at 28 days determined in Accordance with ASTM C140. The Slump shall be between 9 inches and 11 inches. Test Gout strength in Accordance with ASTM C1019 for each 5000 square feet of wall. 7.7 Where the minimum dimension of any continuous vertical cell is 3 inches or less, use Fine Grout, otherwise use Course (Pea Gravel) Grout. 7.8 Mortar shall conform to the following Types as defined in the Building Code: - Masonry in contact with earth: Type M - Exterior Block Walls and Bearing Walls: Type M or S - Non -Bearing Interior Partitions: Type N - Brick Walls or Brick Veneer: Type N 7.9 Provide Control Joints at locations Approved by the Architect in all Masonry Walls at a maximum spacing of 20 feet or 3 times the wall height, whichever is less. Also provide Control Joints adjacent to corners, at changes in wall height and at changes in foundation conditions. Provide a Control Joint at Masonry Walls where support changes from Continuous Strip Footings to thickened slab -on -grade. 7.10 Joint Reinforcement shall be discontinued at control joints and where masonry veneer is supported from the Structuture. 7.11 Do Not locate Control Joints within 16 inches of openings, unless masonry above opening is supported from a Steel Lintel, which is supported from the Structure. 7.12 Horizontal Bond Beam reinforcement shall run continuous through Control Joints. 7.13 Joint Reinforcement shall meet ASTM A82. Provide the following Minimum Continuous Horizontal Masonry Reinforcing at 16" O.C. (Manufactured by Dur-O-Wal or an approved substitute.) - Single Wythe: Unreinforced - Std. Weight. Truss type Reinforced - 8" width Std. Weight Ladder type 10'712" width - Medium Weight Ladder Type - Cavity Walls: Unreinforced - Std. Weight Rectangular Tab Tie Reinforced - 8" width - Std. Weight Rectangular Tab Tie 10'712" width - Medium Weight Rectangular Tab Tie 7.14 All Reinforced Hollow Unit Masonry shall be built to preserve the Unobstructed Vertical Continuity of the cells to be filled. Walls and cross webs forming such cells to be filled shall be full -bedded in Mortar to prevent leakage of the grout. All Head (or end) joints shall be solidly filled with mortar for a distance in from the face of the wall or unit not less than the thickness of the longitudinal face shells. Bond shall be provided by lapping units in successive vertical courses or by equivalent Mechanical anchorage. 7.15 Vertical Cells to be filled shall have Vertical Alignment sufficient to maintain a clear, unobstructed, continuous vertical cell measuring not less than 3 inches and having a clear area of 10 square inches. 7.16 Cleanout openings shall be provided at the bottom of all cells to be filled in each pour of grout where such grout pour in excess of (4) four feet in height. Any overhanging mortar or other obstruction or debris shall be removed from the insides of such cell walls. The cleanouts shall be sealed after Inspection add before grouting. 7.17 Vertical Reinforcement shall be held in position at Top and Bottom and at intervals not exceeding (192) diameters of the reinforcement or (10) feet. 7.18 All Cells containing Reinforcement shall be filled solidly with grout. Grout shall be poured in lifts of (8) feet maximum height. All Grout shall be less than (1) inch or more than (2) inches below the top of the uppermost unit grouted. 7.19 When Total Grout Pour exceeds (8) feet in height, the grout shall be placed in (4) foot lifts and Special Inspection during Groutingshall be less than (1) inch or more than (2) inches Below the top of the uppermost unit grouted. 7.20 When the Grouting is stopped for (1) one hour or longer, Horizontal Construction joints shall be formed by stopping the pour of grout not less than (1) inch or more than (2) inches Below the top of the uppermost unit grouted. 7.21 The Architect shall be given a Minimum of (24) hours notice prior to each reinforced block grouting operation. 7.22 Provide adequate bracing for all masonry walls during construction and until lateral supports and diaphragms have been attached and grout has attained the specified Design Strength. 7.23 Where Lintels bear on Masonry Walls, they shall bear on either a bond beam course or on cores filled with concrete. All Lintels shall have at least (8") of bearing at each end, unless noted otherwise. 7.24 Steel Beams which bear on Masonry Walls shall be Mechaically Anchored and shall bear either on Bond Beams or filled block cores Reinforced with 247 Vertical bars and shall bear a minimum of (8"), unless shown otherwise. 8.0 WOOD FRAMING 8.1 All lumber shall be Southern Pine, No. 2 (mc=19 percent) or equivalent unless noted otherwise. 8.2 Nailing shall conform to the minimum nailing requirements as set forth in the Building Code, unless noted otherwise. 8.3 Provide one row of bridging every 8 feet along span of joists. 8.4 Connection hardware for structural members shall be galvanized Strong -Tie connectors by the Simpson Strong -Tie. Use all specified fasteners to achieve maximum allowable load value unless noted otherwise. Hardware in contact with or anchored to pressure treated wood shall comply with Simpson ZMax coating or equivalent. 8.5 Provide bolt holes in wood that are a minimum of 1/32 to a maximum of 1/16 inch larger in diameter than the bolt diameter. Provide malleable iron washers or equivalent plate washers under all bolt heads or nuts bearing on wood. 8.6 Provide plywood sheathing equal to or better than C-D Int-APA with exterior glue and conforming to US Product standard PS-1-95 for Roof Sheathing. Provide 19/32" thick plywood with a minimum span rating of 40/20. Plywood Sheathing for Shearwalls shall be 19/32" thick APA rated 4-ply or better. Plywood Sheathing shall be continuous over 2 or more supports with the strength axis perpendicular to the supports unless noted otherwise. 8.7 Refer the drawings for Standard Details illustrating acceptable parameters for notching or drilling holes in studs and joists. Any notching or drilling that falls outside the boundaries prescribed in these details must be Reviewed and Approved by the Engineer of Record before proceeding. 8.8 Load -bearing stud walls and all exterior stud walls shall have solid 2x blocking at Third Points. 8.9 Wood in contact with concrete shall be Foundation Grade Pressure -Treated Southern Pine or equivalent. All connection hardware and fasteners in contact with Pressure -Treated wood shall be hot -dipped galvanized, stainless steel or with an approved equivalent finish. 8.10 Unless noted otherwise Sill and Foundation plates shall be anchored to the foundation with 3/4 inch diameter hot -dip galvanized ASTM F1554 Grade 36 Anchor Rods or Headed Bolts, see Details for Embedment and spaced not more than 4 feet apart. Connect each piece with One Bolt located within 8 inches of each end and minimum of two bolts per piece. Provide hot -dip galvanized washers and nuts. 8.11 Wood I -Joists and PSL/LVL beams, columns and headers noted on the drawings shall be manufactured by Weyerhaeuser. Complete Shop Drawings shall be prepared by the manufacturer showing layout and details necessary for determining fit and placement in the building. A complete set of Design Calculations shall be prepared by the manufacturer under the supervision of a Professional Engineer licensed in the Project State for all I -Joists and PSL/LVL beams, headers and columns and their connections to the supporting elements. 8.12 Any stud -to -stud connections not specifically indicated shall be standard NDS toenail connections with (4) 10d common nails, U.N.O. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING GRAPHICS 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 (p) 615.244.8170 www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry Joe Griffith Signature: r Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COM PTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PA N E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 04/08/24= 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE • This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES S000 9.0 STRUCTURAL COMPONENT DESIGN DELEGATED TO COMPONENT SUPPLIER'S ENGINEER STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES 10.0 POST -INSTALLED ANCHORS. REBAR & FASTENERS 10.1 The products listed in this section are the design basis for this project. sdditional requirements are as follows: 9.1 The Delegated Engineer shall be a Professional Engineer registered in the Project State, NOT the Structural Engineer of Record, who a. Post -installed anchors, rebar, and/or fasteners only as directed by the construction documents. undertakes the design of Structural Components or Structural Systems for the Project. This is a Reminder to Delegated Engineers that in b. Prodict diameter and embedment shall be as shown in the details. Affixing His/Her Seal to Structural Drawings of the Structural Components or Structural Systems, the Delegated Engineer has Accepted C. Install products in accordance with Manufacturer's Printed Installation Instructions. Responsibility for the Design of the Structural Components or Structural Systems. d. Prior to installation, contractor shall contact manufacturer's representative for product -specific installation training and a letter shall be submitted to the Engineer -of -Record (EOR) indicating training has taken place. 9.2 A Structural Component is an individual Structural Member designed to be part of a Structural System. e. Unless noted otherwise on the contract documents, refer to the project Building Code and/or evaluation report for required special inspections and proof load requirements. 9.3 A Structural System is a portion of a Structure comprising an Assembly of Structural Components. f. Substitution requests for products other than those listed below may be Submitted by the Contactor to the FOR for review. Substitutions will ONLY be considered for products having a Research Report recognizing 9.4 Drawings introducing Engineering input such as defining the Configuration or Structural Capacity of Prefabricated Structural Components or the product for the appropriate application under the project Building Code. Substitution requfests shall their Assembly into Structural Systems, shall require the Seal and Signature of the Delegated Engineer who prepared them. include calculations that demonstrate the substituted product is capable of achieving the equivalent performance values of the design bassis product. 9.5 Manual Calculations and Computer Printouts shall require the Seal and Signature of the Delegated Engineer who prepared them. 9.6 The design of Pre -Engineered Systems specified in the Contract Documents which are designed/engineered by the System Supplier is the sole responsibility of the Supplier and its Design Engineer licensed in the Project State. Submittals of such Systems to the Structural Engineer of Record (EOR) shall be Reviewed for Conformance with the Contract Documents with regard to the arrangement and/or sizes of members shown on the Structural Contract Documents and the suppliers interpretation of the Design Information included in the Contract Documents. Such review by the Structural Engineer of Record shall not imply any responsibility for the actual design of such Systems. The Contractor shall be responsible for Dimensional Accuracy and Conformance with the information contained in Contract Documents. 9.7 See applicable sections of general notes and specifications for the appropriate design responsibilities of the supplier and its licensed engineer. 9.8 The contract documents (drawings, general notes and specifications) shall govern in the event of a conflict with the specifications and/or code of practice for aisc, pci, sji, mbma or other standards. 9.9 Design of components delegated to delegated engineers include but is not limited to: steel stairs and hand/guard rails, steel connections, roof trusses, rooftop equipment screen walls and their connections to the structure 9.10 "Specialty Items" - Steel Stairs, Guardrails, and Handrails 1. Structural Steel Stair, Handrail and Guardrail Shop Drawings shall bear the Seal and Signature of an Engineer Registered in the Project State. Handrails shall be designed in accordance with the Referenced Code. Stairs shall be designed for a 100 p.s.f. Live Load. 2. Handrails shall be of 1-1/2 inch diameter Steel Pipe. Guardrail horizontal members shall be 1 1/2 inch diameter Steel Pipe. Guardrail posts shall be 1 1/2 inch diameter X-Strong Steel Pipe spaced 5'-0" maximum on center. 3. Handrails and Guardrails shall be designed and detailed to comply with all applicable OSHA standards. Provide Toe Guards as required by OSHA. 4. All Shop Drawings shall be Approved by the Owner or his Authorized Representative prior to fabrication. For anchoring into CONCRETE: 1.1 Mechanical Anchors shall bave been tested in accordance with ACI-355.2 and ICC-ES AC193 for cracked concrete and seismic applications. Pre -approved products include: SIMPSON STRONG -TIE "TITEN-HD" (ICC-ES ESR-2713) 1.2 Adhesive for Rebar and Anchors shall bave been tested in accordance with ACI 355.4 and ICC-ES AC308 for cracked concrete and seismic applications. Design bond strength has been based on cracked concrete, ACI 355-4 temperature coatgory b, and installations into dry holes drilled using a hammer drill into concrete that has cured for at least 21 days. Adhesive anchors shall be installed by a certified adhesive anchor installer when required per ACI 318-11 d.9.2.2. Installations requiring certified installers shal be inspected per ACI 318-11 d.9.2.4. Pre-aproved products include: SIMPSON STRONG -TIE "SET-3G" (ICC-ES ESR-4057) For anchoring into MASONRY: 2.1 Solid -grouted Concrete Masonry 2.1.1. Mechanical Anchors shall bave been tested in accordance with ICC-ES or ICC- ES AC106. Pre -approved products include: SIMPSON STRONG -TIE "TITEN-HD" (ICC-ES ESR-1056) 2.1.2. Adhesive for Rebar and Anchors shall have been tested in accordance with ICC- ES AC58. Pre -approved products include: SIMPSON STRONG -TIE "SET-3G" 2.2 Hollow Concrete Masonry 2.2.1. Mechanical Anchors shall have been tested in accordance with ICC-ES AC106. Pre -approved products include: SIMPSON STRONG -TIE "TITEN-HD" 2.2.2. Adhesive for Rebar and Anchorswith screen tubes shall have been tested for use in accordance with ICC-ES AC 58. The appropriate screen tube shall be used as recomended by the adhesive manufacturer. Pre-apprived products include: SIMPSON STRONG -TIE "SET-3G" 11.0 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS Special Inspection is to be provided in addition to the inspections conducted by the Department of Building Safety and shall not be construed to relieve the Owner or his Authorized Agent from requesting the periodic and called inspections required by the Building Code. Special Inspection shall be paid by the Owner, and shall satisfy all inspection requirements of the Building Code. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to regular inspections, the following items will also require special inspection in accordance with Chapter 17 of the governing Building Code. A. Structural Steel (2018 IBC Section 1705.2) B. Field Welding C. High Strength Bolts D. Structural Concrete (2018 IBC Section 1705.3) E. Anchors Cast in Concrete F. Post -Installed Anchors in Concrete G. Rebar H. Soils (2018 IBC Section 1705.6) J. Structural Masonry (2018 Section 1505.4) Special inspector shall meet the qualifications as stated in the building code and shall perform the duties and responsibilities as outllined in the building code. 3. Specail inspection shall meet the requirements of IBC section 1704. Special inspector(s) shall be hired by the oener to perform the required special inspections. The names of persons of firms who are to perform the special inspections shall be forwarded to the building official for approval. The special inspector(s) shall complete and submit all forms required by the building department having jurisdiction. 4. The special Inspector(s) shall: A. Observe the work assigned for conformance to the approved drawing and specifications. B. Furnish inspection reports to the engineer of record and building department. Discrepancies shall be brought to the immediate attention of the contractor for correction, then, if not corrected to the engineer and the building department. C. Submit toe the engineer of record and the building department a signed final report stating that the work was in conformance with the approved drawings and specifications and the applicable workmanship provisions of the IBC. 5. Special Inspection Notes: A. Continuous special inspection is always required during the performance of the work unless specificlly noted below. B. Where favrication of structural load -bearing members and assemblies is being performed on the premises of a fabricator's shop, continuout special inspection is required during the performance of the work except as allowed in IBC section 1704 and unless specifically noted below. C. It is the responsibility of the contractor to provide the special inspector(s) with advance notice, no less than one working day, of the initiation of any work required to have special inspections. All work performed without required special inspection will be subject to removal. 6. All Special Inspection requirements shown in Chapter 17 of the Building Code must be satisfied in addition to any requirements shown in this sheet. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING GRAPHICS 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 (p) 615.244.8170 www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry Joe Griffth Signature: Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COM PTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PA N E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 04/08/24= 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES S001 W C( H M L E I M N u V) O cu O L cu N i u O s E i V1 i V1 D I -- 1 2 28'-10 1/2" S310 l 4 5 SIM. S3.0 20'-0" MIN. — — — — — — SHEARWALL— — — — — — — --- J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II NOTE: ALL WALL STUDS SUPPORTING TRUSSES SHALL BE I I SPACED AT 12" O.C. MAX. CENTER I I STUDS ON TRUSS BEARING POINTS. I I I I I I I Co 0 co i 0 M N 8 S3.0 SLAB LEAVE -OUT I I FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION = 960.50' (SEE t IL) I I REFERENCE F.F.E = (0'-0") I I - PREPARE SUBGRADE TO RECEIVE FUTURE 4" SLAB -ON -GRADE PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS I IN THE GEOTECHNICALREPORT. COORDINATE WITH TENANT REQUIREMENTS. I I J J oQl I � Cn I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I 1 5 I I I I I I S3.0 I I I I I I I I II I 4'-0" I I ,o C', L I I I I I I F 1+ I F1 —9 I — S3.0 I I S3.0 FOUNDATION PLAN 1 3/16" = 1'-0" AC I I L — 7 F2 L_ _ — S3.0 15'-8 3/4" 3 FROST SLAB FROST SLAB 5 S3.0 4 S3.0 4 S3.0 C, ,o I F — — _ J F2 14'-1 3/4" 11 S3.0 5 TIE BAR. CROSS TIE EVERY OTHER kL BAR. VERT. DOWEL BARS w/ 90' STD. HOOK PEDESTAL SCHEDULE MARK SIZE REINFORCING T/PEDESTAL EL. P1 20" x 20" (12) - #6 VERT. w/ #3 TIES -0'-8" P2 20" x 20" (12) - #6 VERT. w/ #3 TIES -0'-8" NOTE: SPACE ALL TIES AT 8" O.C. (TOP 4 TIE LAYERS ARE SPACED @ 2" O.C.) CENTER PEDESTALS ON FOOTINGS/COLUMNS AT P1, PROVIDE STD. 180 DEG. HOOKS AT TOP OF #6 VERT. BARS IN PEDESTAL. FOUNDATION NOTES: 1. TYPICAL T/EXTERIOR FOOTING = (-4'-0"), UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BOTTOM OF ALL EXTERIOR FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR AT A MINIMUM OF 4'-0" BELOW FINISH GRADE. BEARING ELEVATION MUST BE ADJUSTED FOR BLOCK COURSING AND VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BASED ON FINAL SITE GRADING PLAN. (COORDINATE WITH CIVIL). 2. REFER TO DRAWINGS S0.0 & S0.1 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 3. VERIFY DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 4. LOWER FOOTINGS WHERE REQUIRED TO ACCOMODATE PLUMBING, SLAB RECESSES, FINISH GRADE, ETC. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL AND PLUMBING DRAWINGS. 5. SEE 3/S3.0 FOR TYPICAL STEPPED FOOTING DETAIL. CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATIONS WITH SITE GRADING PLANS. NOTIFY E.O.R. IF STEPS ARE REQUIRED. 6. REFER TO GEOTECH REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING SOIL UNDER SLAB AND FOUNDATIONS. 7. G.C. TO COORDINATE ANY FLOOR CONSTRUCTION WITH REQUIREMENTS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 8. SEE S3.0-S3.1 FOR TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAILS. 9. SEE 5/S4.0 FOR TYPICAL SHEAR WALL ASSEMBLY. 10. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 3" CONCRETE COVER OVER ALL BELOW GRADE STEEL. „H" V / 1 1/2" NON - SHRINK GROUT c.� Q CONC. COLUMN MARK COLUMN SIZE BASE PLATE ANCHOR BOLTS ** WELD REMARKS A I B C D E F G NO. H Cl HSS5x5x3/8 3/4" 11" 11" 4" 4" 3/4" 9" 4 1/4" C2 HSS5x5x1/2 11/4" 14" 14" 51/2" 5112" 7/8" 9" 4 5/8"* * COLUMN MAY BE CONNECTED TO BASE PLATE WITH ALL AROUND CJP GROOVE WELD IN LIEU OF FILLET WELD SHOWN. ** ASTM F1554 (36ksi) ANCHOR BOLTS (RODS OR HEADED BOLTS) W/(2) FLAT WASHERS AND (2) HEX NUTS (TYP.) FOOTING SCHEDULE MARK FOOTING SIZE REINFORCING F1 T-0" x 3'-0" x 1'-0" #5 @ 12" O.C. MAX. E.W. T&B F2 6'-0" x 6'-0" x 1'-0" #5 @ 12" O.C. MAX. E.W. T&B SEE FOUNDATION NOTE 1 FOR FOOTING DEPTH INFO SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE TYPE 1 (SW1) EXTERIOR SHEATHING 19/32" THICK STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD/OSB SHEATHING ON EXTERIOR FACE ATTACHMENT BOUNDARY &EDGES 10d NAILS @ 6" O.C. U.N.O. FIELD 10d NAILS @ 12" O.C. U.N.O. BOTTOM SILL PLATE TO SLAB 3/4" 0 x 6" LONG SIMPSON TITEN HD ANCHORS @ 16" O.C. & MAX. 8" FROM EA. END WALL HOLD DOWN ANCHOR SIMPSON HDU8-SDS2.5 ANCHOR BOLTS (1) 7/8" O SET-3G EPDXY ANCHOR @ EA. HOLD DOWN (7" EMBED. INTO CONT. FTG.) STUD SCREWS (20) - 1/4 x 2 1/2" SIDS SCREWS CHORD STUDS (2) - 2x6 FRAMING MEMBERS @ EA. END (MINIMUM) NOTE: PROVIDE BLOCKING AT ALL SHEATHING EDGES. PLACE HOLD DOWN AT EACH END OF SHEAR WALL. NON- SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE SHEATHING 19/32" THICK PLYWOOD/OSB SHEATHING (SEE ARCH.) ATTACHMENT BOUNDARY &EDGES 10d NAILS @ 12" O.C. U.N.O. FIELD 10d NAILS @ 12" O.C. U.N.O. BOTTOM SILL PLATE TO SLAB 3/4" 0 x 6" LONG SIMPSON TITEN HD ANCHORS @ 48" O.C. & MAX. 8" FROM EA. END NOTE: ALL TYPICAL LOAD BEARING STUD WALL FRAMING IS 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. WITH CONTINUOUS DOUBLE 2x6 TOP PLATE ALL AROUNd, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PLANNING 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING (p)615.244.8170 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry Joe Griffth Signature: Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COMPTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 040824= 24114 t NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. FOUNDATION PLAN S100 At 0 z a T 1 A — — — H2 WOOD HEADER SCHEDULE HEADER JACK STUDS KING STUDS TOP/BOTTOM SILL MARK NO. SIZE & GRADE NO. SIZE NO. SIZE NO. SIZE HEADER LOCATION MAX. SPAN H1 3 2x12 2 2x6 2 2x6 2 2x6 TOP OF OPENING 12'-0" H2 3 2x8 2 2x6 2 2x6 1 2x6 TOP OF OPENING 4'-0" H3 1 PSL 5 1/4 x 9 1/4 (1.8E) 2 2x6 2 2x6 2 2x6 TOP OF OPENING 15-0" H4 1 PSL 5 1/4 x 11 1/4 (1.8E) 2 2x6 2 2x6 2 2x6 TOP OF OPENING 15-0" F � HEADER FRAMING PLAN 3/16" = V-0" S5.0 NOTE: HEADERS IN TABLE ARE SIZED BASED ON THE MAX SPANS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL. NOTIFY FOR OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. WOOD HEADER SCHEDULE NOTES: - NAIL ALL HEADERS, BEAMS AND LINTELS UP TO 11 7/8" DEPTH w/ 10d NAILS @ 12" O.C. TOP AND BOTTOM (MIN.) - NAIL ALL HEADERS, BEAMS AND LINTELS GREATER THAN 11 7/8" IN DEPTH @ 12" O.C. TOP, MIDDLE AND BOTTOM (MIN.) - (3) PLY & GREATER HEADER, BEAM AND LINTEL MEMBERS REQUIRE NAILING FROM EACH SIDE. - ALL HEADERS TO BE PLACED DIRECTLY BELOW WALL TOP PLATES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. - NAIL ALL 2x4 STUD COLUMNS w/10d NAILS @ 8" O.C. STAGGERED, ADJACENT FASTENERS FROM OPPOSITE SIDES. - NAIL ALL 2x6 AND GREATER STUD COLUMNS w/ (2) 10d NAILS @ 8" O.C. STAGGERED, ADJACENT FASTENERS FROM OPPOSITE SIDES. - PROVIDE (1) - 2x6 JACK STUD AT EACH END OF LOW BOTTOM SILL STUD. - PROVIDE SIMPSON 'A35' CLIP AT EACH SILL (TOP AND BOT.) STUD TO JACK STUD CONNECTION. -PROVIDE SIMPSON DTT2Z (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) HOLD DOWN AT EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS. SEE DETAIL FOR ADD'L INFO. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING GRAPHICS 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 (p) 615.244.8170 www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry Joe Griffith Signature: *e_t"410� Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COM PTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 04/08/24= 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. HEADER FRAMING PLAN S200 n W_ d H E M L E I M N u H O cu u O L tv N / u O s U H i H 0 NOTE: ALL WALL STUDS SUPPORTING TRUSSES SHALL BE SPACED AT 12" O.C. MAX. CENTER STUDS ON TRUSS BEARING POINTS. CANOPY (SEE ARCH.) B 00 LO s5.o 3 0 2 S4.1 n 00 rn co N E co 0 WOODEN TRUSS DEPTH AT LOW END = 32" ROOF FRAMING PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" 6 S4.0 / S5.02 4'-0" 28'-10 1 /2" 7 S4.0 T 2x6 RTU CURB SUPPORT FRAMING (TYP. - U.N.O.) RTU-3 1083# l 1 T � i U O � - o �N1 V W rt O m U) di I J LU i z - RTU-2 651# w f J O O -� - - �NOTE: EXTEND 2x6 w/ MST148 DIAPHRAGM CHORD - ACROSS DT BUMP -OUT NOTE: TRUSSES EXTENDING AT DT BUMP -OUT SHALL NOT BE DESIGNED TO BE SUPPORTED BY HEADER AT GRID LINE 2 T� RTU-1 1 651# N U) W 14X22 W 14X22 SIM. 7 1 10 1 1 S4.0 S4.0 S4.1 15'-8 3/4" 14'-1 3/4" T/COL. = 15'-10" 2 3 5 1 CANOPY (SEE ARCH.) (�S5.0 WOODEN TRUSS DEPTH AT HIGH END = 41" NOTE: PROVIDE BLOCKING BETWEEN STUDS AS REQUIRED BY CANOPY VENDOR FOR CANOPY ATTACHMENT (2) SIMPSON MST136 STRAPS AT DOUBLE TOP PL. F TRUSS NOTES: 1. DESIGN OF TRUSSES AND THEIR CONNECTION TO EACH OTHER AND TO THE STRUCTURE IS A PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION. 2. CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO CONSULT WITH TRUSS MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID PRICE. 3. TRUSS MANUFACTURER'S ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CALCULATION OF ALL LOADS ON TRUSSES AND THE DESIGN OF ALL TRUSSES. 4. TRUSS MANUFACTURER SHALL ALSO DESIGN AND PROVIDE ALL HARDWARE NECESSARY FOR ALL CONNECTIONS. 5. CONNECTIONS MAY REQUIRE SPECIALLY FABRICATED AND DESIGNED HARDWARE TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT. 6. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CONNECTION OF TRUSSES WITH TRUSS MANUFACTURER. 7. REFERENCE GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 8. VERIFY ALL SLOPES WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 9. TRUSS DESIGN SHALL INCLUDE SUPPORT FOR RTU'S., ROOF HATCH, AND ANY ASSOCIATED OPENINGS IN ROOF FRAMING. 10. TRUSS DESIGN SHALL INCLUDE SUPPORT FOR ALL LOADS APPLIED AT PARAPET KICKER BASE CONNECTIONS, IF APPLICABLE. 11. TRUSS DESIGN SHALL ACOUNT FOR WIND LOADS PLYWOOD SPACER SPANOF CLIPS AT MIDSPAN 10 2'-0' MAX SHEATHINNG (TYPICAL) - ROOF TRUSS (SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN) II II II II II II II II I II II II II II II II PLYWOOD EDGE SUPPORTED u 11 11 BY ROOF FRAMING II III II II II FACE GRAIN 11 11 II II II II II II II II II 19/32" PLYWOOD SHEATHING NOTES: 1. RUN LONG DIMENSION OF PLYWOOD SHEETS PERPENDICULAR TO TRUSSES OR STICK FRAMING. PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED FOR EDGE SUPPORT. 2. STAGGER PLYWOOD END JOINTS 4'-0" AS SHOWN. 3. NAILING SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS WITH 10d NAILS, U.N.O.: - BOUNDARY - (B.N.) 6" O.C. AT ROOF PERIMETER, PLATE LINES. CHORDS, STRUTS, MASONRY WALLS, RIDGE LINES, AND AS CALLED FOR ON THE DRAWINGS. - EDGE - (E.N.) 6" O.C. AT BEARING ENDS AND SIDES OF EACH PLYWOOD SHEET. - FIELD - (F.N.) 12" O.C. AT ALL INTERMEDIATE BEARINGS. 4. ALL NAILS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM EDGE DISTANCE OF 3/8". 5. B.N. ALL BLOCKING AT BEAMS, TRUSSES, OR STICK FRAMING THAT ALIGN WITH BRACED WALL PANELS, FULL LENGTH OF BUILDING. E.N. AT PERIMETER OF ALL OPENINGS THRU SHEATHING. O2 TYPICAL ROOF DECK ATTACHMENT SCALE: N.T.S. FRAMING NOTES: 1. REFER TO DRAWINGS S0.0 AND S0.1 FOR GENERAL NOTES AND DRAWINGS S4.0 AND S4.1 FOR TYPICAL FRAMING DETAILS. 2. VERIFY DIMENSIONS WITH ARCH. DRAWINGS. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON ARCH. DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 4. ROOF DECKING SHALL BE EXTERIOR GRADE 19/32" APA RATED STRUCTURAL SHEATHING FULLY BLOCKED WITH A MINIMUM SPAN RATING OF 40/20. ATTACH PER DETAIL 2/S2.1. 5. TRUSS BEARING ELEVATION = 12'-3" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR, U.N.O. (COORDINATE W/ ARCHITECTURAL) 6. ALL TRUSSES SHALL BE SPACED AT 2'-0" O.C. MAX. (U.N.O.) 7. ALL BLOCKING & BRACING SHALL BE JOB CUT AND FRAMED. 8. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS DOUBLE TOP PLATE AT TRUSS BEARING ELEVATION AT ALL LOAD BEARING AND EXTERIOR WALLS. SPLICE PER DETAIL 2/S4.1. 9. G.C. RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING RTU CURB SUPPORT FRAMING MEMBERS AT ALL RTU CURBS. 10. ► INDICATES MOMENT CONNECTION. NOTE: APPLY ALONG ENTIRE ROOF PERIMETER AND WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN. W=1,1S, SNOW DRIFT LOADS N.T.S. 23 PSF TRUSS NET UPLIFT PLAN (NOMINAL'ASD' PRESSURES) ROOF DECK PLANNING 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING (p)615.244.8170 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry yJoe Griffith Signature: Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COMPTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 04/08/24= 24114 t NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. ROOF FRAMING PLAN S2ml At w CY Q) LA E R L EI M N u L N O u C O i C R a N i H C E V O 0 E 4A NOT USED SCALE: N.T.S. FSEE FOOTING SECTION FOR REINFORCEMENT U z 0 O U_ PROVIDE MATCH I BARS FOR ALL HO (TYP.) PRO BAR All PLAN - INTERSECTION TYP. FOOTING DETAILS SCALE: N.T.S. VENEER v 2x6 STUD WALL (PER ARCH.) SHEATHING (SEE SCHED) SILL PLATE ANCHOR #4 @ 12" O.C. (SEE 6/S3.0) EXT. SLAB, PAVEMENT FUTURE SLAB (PER CIVIL) F.F.E. z Q #4 DOWELS 0- @ 12" O.C. LU 8" (3) - #5 CONT. k' 2'-0" #5 @ 12" O.C. FOOTING SECTION AT WALL 5 3/4" = 1'-0" NOTE: SEE SCHEDULE FOR COLUMN, HSS (SEE PLAN) BASE PLATE AND ANCHOR BOLT INFO. NOT SHOWN VENEER (SEE ARCH.) EXTERIOR SLAB/PAVEMENT (SEE CIVIL/ARCH.) FUTURE SLAB �I z - a ALU PO w z Q J PEDESTAL -SEE w '00� 1 SCHED. FOR cn WALL FTG. BEYOND SIZE AND REINF. THORU CONTINUE REINF. FTG F 3" CLR. �EQQ 9 PERIMETER COLUMN FOOTING 3/4" = EQ U FOOTING - SEE SCHED. FOR SIZE AND REINF. SHEATHING - (SEE SCHED.) SIMPSON BPS 3"x3" PLATE WASHER SILL ANCHOR (SEE SCHED.) F- z 0 O O LL NLRIFTNLLO[i]l RIZ. REINF. VIDE MATCHING S FOR ALL HORIZ (TYP.) (t WALL FSEE FOOTING SECTION FOR REINFORCEMENT PLAN - CORNER EXTERIOR STUD WALL (SEE PLAN) 2x6 PRESSURE TREATED SILL PLATE (TYP.) FUTURE SLAB (SEE PLAN) _,,,/ F.F.E. STOP OF FOOTING TYPICAL SILL PLATE ANCHORAGE SCALE: N.T.S. NOTIFY E.O.R. IF STEPS ARE REQUIRED. 9'-n,, (TYP 1 4' - n,, MIN BENT BARS S & SIZE AS FOI TYP. STEPPED FOOTING DETAILS SCALE: N.T.S. VENEER (PER ARCH.) SHE (SEE (2) #5 CON EXT. SLAB, PAVEMENT (PER CIVIL) TOREFRONT >EE ARCH.) HSS BEAM (SEE S5.0) 6STUD @16"O.0 FUTURE SLAB _ z J TOWELS a LU 2" O.C. LLU 21-011 FOUNDATION SECTION AT KNEE WALL 3/4" = 1'-0" SHEAR WALL CHORD MEMBER VENEER_ (PER ARCH.) HOLD DOWN SHEATHING (SEE SCHED.) EXT. SLAB PAVEMENT (PER CIVIL) FUTURE SLAB F.F.E. HOLD DOWN ANCHOR w m SEE SHEAR WALL Liu SCHEDULE FOR ADD'L INFO. FOOTING. SEE PLAN & SECTIONS TYPICAL FDN. SECTION AT HOLDDOWN 3/4" = 1'-0" ISO. JT. BTWN. FROST SLAB AND ADJ. SIDEWALK (TYP. ALL SIDES) EXT. SLAB, PAVEMENT (PER CIVIL) 3" VOID FORM #4 @ 12" O.C. E.W. (TYP.) B/FTG. ELEV. OL = 4'-0" (MIN.) (t WALL SEE ARCH. STOREFRONT/DOOR (PER ARCH.) STOREFRONT" ARCH.) #4 @ 12" O.C. EXT. SLAB, PAVEMENT FUTURE SLAB (PER CIVIL) F.F.E. z J #4 DOWELS @ 12" O.C. o W/ STD. HOOK w 8" (3) - #5 CONT. TING DEPTH VS AND 2'-0" ;) #5 @ 12" O.C. FOOTING SECTION AT STOREFRONT 3/4" = 1'-0" STOREFRONT (SEE ARCH.) VENEER (PER ARCH.) 2x6 STUD @ 16" O.C. SHEATHING (SEE SCHED.) EXT. SLAB, PAVEMENT (2) #5 CONT. (PER CIVIL) FUTURE SLAB z Q #4 DOWELSLU a @ 12" O.C. LLU U) 0 r 21 - 011 1/2" JT. MATERIAL #4 @ 12" O.C. CONT. (TYP.) SLAB (SEE PLAN) #4 @ 12" O.C. E.W. (TYP.) 11 #4 DOWELS @ 12" O.C. 4" 4" z Q J W W 10" 7" 1'-41 0" 0 01 2'-6" 11 TYP. FOUNDATION SECTION AT DOOR FOUNDATION SECTION AT DRIVE-THRU 3/4" = 1'-0" ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING (p)615.244.8170 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry Joe Griffith Signature: C��2 Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COM PTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PA N E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 040824= 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. FOUNDATION DETAILS S300 NOTE: COORD. SCRENWALL AND VENEER REQUIREMENTS WITH ARCH. SEE ARCH. / CIVIL FOR LOCATION / EXTENTS. DOWELS TO MATCH VERT. REINF. (SEE PLAN) FINISHED GRADE (SEE CIVIL/ARCH.) 8" BOND BEAM w/(2) - #5 CONT. 8" CMU WALL REINF w/#5 @ 32" O.C. 1/2" EXP. JT. MATERIAL CONC. SLAB (SEE 2/S302) GROUT SOLID BELOW GRADE a� 4'-0" MIN. BELOW FINISH GRADE 3" CLR. (TYP.) 3'-9" (4) - #5 CONT. T&B #5 @ 12" O.C. T&B DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION 3/4" — 1'-0" (SEE DETAIL BELOW) INFLUENCE ZONE WALL FOOTING REINFORCING a V a 2" COMPRESSIBLE FILLER PLACED UNIFORMLY AROUND PIPE NOTE: PROVIDE CONCRETE PROTECTION AROUND UTILITY LINE WHEN LINE IS WITHIN FOOTING ZONE. �z E MIN. TYPICAL UTILITY LINE UNDER FOOTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. SIGN CABINET (BY OTHERS) VENE (PER ARC GROUT BELOW GI 4" C SEE ARCH/CIVIL FOR LOCATION EXTENTS. o EXTERIOR::\,, CONC. SLAB w/ o SLAB/PAVEMENT #4 @ 12" O.C. E.W. (SEE CIVIL) ® _ � 3" CLR. #5 @ 12" O.C. o (TYP.) T&B • 4'-0" (2) - #4 CONT. n DUMPSTER PAD SLAB EDGE DETAIL MONUMENT SIGN SECTION n MONUMENT SIGN SECTION VENE (PER ARC i GROUT BELOW GI 1 1/2" NON-SHRIN SCALE: N.T.S. =LUENCE ZONE LINE LINE PARALLEL \ TO FOOTING SEE CIVIL, SITE, AND MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR SLEEVE N O 0 LEAN CONCRET FILL - fc = 1500 PSI SEE CIVIL, SITE, AND MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR SLEEVE WALL FOOTING REINFORCING SAME SIZE AND NUMBER AS BOTTOM REINFORCING OTHER UTILITIES MAY OCCUR 2'-0". 3/4" = 1'-0" 1'-6" TYPICAL PENETRATIONS OF SLEEVES IN FOOTING SCALE: N.T.S. 12'-0" MONUMENT FOUNDATION PLAN 1 /4" = 1'-0" 3/4" = 1'-0" HSS6x6x1/4 POST (2 PLACES) w/ 1 "x12"x1'-0" BASE PL. (4) - 1" DIA. F1554-36 HEADED THREADED RODS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING GRAPHICS 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 (p) 615.244.8170 www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry Joe Griffth Signature: Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COM PTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PA N E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 04/08/24= 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE s This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. FOUNDATION DETAILS S3ml SIMPSON HTP372 (EACH SIDE). NOT REQ'D @ OPENINGS <5' WIDE. FASTEN KING STUDS TO HEADER w/ (6) MIN. 1/4" SDS SCREWS w/ 4" MIN. PENETRATION INTO HEADER. (TYP. EACH END.) KING STUDS (SEE SCHED.) SIMPSON DTT2Z HOLD DOWN w/ 1/2"0 SIMPSON SET-3G EXPDXY ANCHOR (6" EMBED.) CONT. DOUBLE TOP PLATE HEADER (SEE SCHED.) SEE HEADER SCHEDULE FOR STUD QUANTITIES & ADD'L INFO _JACK STUDS (SEE SCHED.) SIMPSON A35 BOT. SILL STUD (SEE SCHED.) TYPICAL LOW HEADER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. SHEARWALL ASSEMBLY //�(28) 10d NAILS, EQ. SPA. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O TOP VIEW NOTE: SPLICE IS REQUIRED AT ALL CONTINUOUS TOP PLATES TOP PLATE SPLICE DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. EDGE NAILING CONT. DOUBLE TOP STAGGER NAILING AT TOP PLATES PLATE 71 •1 T Z STUD AT PANEL EDGE. TI PANEL JOINT. EDGE I I 1 2 11 11 11 NAIL I I I - II II II 11 11 11 II I1 I I II II II N II II II I I -- I I II II II PLYWOOD SHEATHING II II II I I1 1 I• I II LI II II II I I1 I � II II II II II II I I1 I I II II I � II II II I I1 PROVIDE BLOCKING AT a All I I A I I 1 EDGE NAILING ALL PANEL EDGES (TYP.) U_ I I I I I I 1 •I LI II II II (FULL HEIGHT) PANEL JOINT. EDGE z II II II 1 1 NAIL :�i 11 11 11 I LLF—____ II 11 II 11 II I HOLDOWN POST OR -' -------- -- FIELD NAIL AT ALL—_—_—_�—_--_�—_—J I MULTIPLE -STUD POST NON -JOINT STUDS 1 r 1 1 AT EACH END 1 OF SHEARWALL I II II I� �I II II 1 II II II Z II II II II II II � II II II II II II o EDGE NAIL II 11 II 11 II 11 II II II FBI II II II SILL PLATE BOLTING (OR NAILING) FOOTING PER PLAN TYPICAL SHEAR WALL ASSEMBLY SCALE: N.T.S. TRUSS BRG. EL. CONT. DOUBLE TOP PL. @ TRUSS BRG. BOLT TO WF w/ 1/2" 0 BOLTS AND WASHERS @ 12" O.C. (STAGGER NS AND FS ON BEAM GAGE) WF BEAM (SEE PLAN) 12" DOOR OR WINDOW HEADER PER PLAN. CONNECTION PER DETAILS STATED ON PLAN. ADD SHEATHING AT OPENINGS TO BE FLUSHED WITH SHEARWALL. TRIMMER STUD. COUNTER -SINK FOR HOLDOWN BOLTS AS REQUIRED HOLDOWN PER PLAN SEE SCHEDULE SLAB TURN DOWN FOOTING PER PLAN PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FOOTING DOWEL AT EACH HOLD DOWN LOCATION BORED HOLES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED AT THE SAME SECTION NOTE: OF STUD AS A CUT OR NOTCH. ALL PILES OF TOP PLATE MUST BE CONTINUOUSLY NAILED TOGETHER w/ MIN. OF 10d NAIL @ 6" O.C. GENERAL NOTES: 1) SHEATHING ON ONE SIDE OF SHEARWALL MUST BE NAILED COMPLETELY BEFORE FRAME INSPECTION. 2) FRAME INSPECTION MUST BE DONE BEFORE INSTALLING SHEATHING ON THE OTHER SIDE OF WALL. 3) ENTIRE SHEARWALL MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE INSTALLING WALL COVERING. 4) STUDS @ 16" OC MAX (U.N.O.) nnnlrl Ir'\InIT r /'11VLL JVIIV 1 NOTE: STAGGER PANEL JOINTS (WHERE PANELS SPECIFIED) ON EACH SIDE OF WALL. SECTION A -A FOR HOLE DIAMETERS BETWEEN 2/5d AND 3/5d DOUBLE THE NUMBER OF STUDS SHOWN ON DRAWING, THIS DETAIL CAN BE USED PROVIDED NOT MORE THAN TWO SUCCESSIVE STUDS ARE BORED. NON -LOAD BEARING WALL HOLE SCALE: N.T.S. T/PARAPET EL. = 19'-0" MAX. (VARIES - SEE ARCH.) PARAPET FRAMING INTEGRAL WITH TRUSS 2x BLOCKING BETWEEN STUDS w W a 2 " IY w J w w a u- = � 0 U � U � O �� ao � 0 z z O W V TRUSS BEARING EL. LL = SEE PLAN CONT. (2) - 2x6 TOP PLATE SHEATHING MUST BE APPLIED DIRECTLY TO ALL WALL STUDS 2x6 CONT. SHEATHING (PER ARCH.) NOTE: BORED HOLES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED AT THE SAME SECTION OF STUD AS A CUT OR NOTCH. FOR HOLE DIAMETERS BETWEEN 2/5d AND 3/5d DOUBLE THE NUMBER OF STUDS SHOWN ON DRAWING, THIS DETAIL CAN BE USED PROVIDED NOT MORE THAN TWO SUCCESSIVE STUDS ARE BORED. LOAD BEARING WALL HOLE SCALE: N.T.S. T/PARAPET EL. = 19'-0" MAX. CONT. (VARIES - SEE ARCH.) 2x6 SPLICE w/ SIMPSON MST148 STRAPS 2x BLOCKING - 10d NAILS @ 6" O.C. (TYP.) PLYWOOD DECKING BETWEEN STUDS (SEE PLAN) 10d NAILS @ 6" O.C. (TYP.) h T/TRUSS Al� = VARIES Ir -1w BLOCKING AS REQ'D w - AT PANEL EDGES (6) - 10d NAILS — _ a @ LAP o �u.lW �w a 2x6 BLOCKING FOR v EDGE NAILING � V �j p O O Q N_ SIMPSON H2.5A 2x6 FIELD FRAMING '>' c @ 16" O.C. a o T ZW -" TRUSS BEARING EL. Q —SIMPSON A34 = SEE PLAN w— TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. (SEE PLAN) CONT. (2) - 2x6 "—STUD WALL TOP PLATE (STUDS @ 12" O.C.) (CENTER STUD AT EA. TRUSS) TYPICAL TRUSS BEARING DETAIL 3/4" = 11-011 (t COL. I 1 DHSS COLUMN (SEE PLAN) � I � 1/4 HSS 1 12" 12" B/BEAM EL. _SEE PLAN I HSS L3x3x1/4 TEMPORARY ERECTION ANGLE (TYP. EACH SIDE) TYP. fp�YKo]►19 CONT. 2x6 SPLICE w/'SIMPSON' MST148 STRAPS (6) - 10d NAILS (7) - 10d NAILS 2x6 BLOCKING EACH KICKER LU26 JOIST HANGER EACH END OF BLOCKING AA (5) - 10d NAILS 2x6 KICKER 2x6 CROSS TIE EACH STUD BLOCKING AS REQ'D /AT PANEL EDGES —(5) - 10d NAILS -'SIMPSON' A35 CLIPS SIDE BY SIDE TOP PLATE TO STUD SHEATHING MUST BE APPLIED DIRECTLY TO ALL WALL STUDS 7 TYPICAL SIDEWALL FRAMING DETAIL O11 _ 1 11 3/4 - 1 -0 (SEE PLAN) ON PLAN. ATTACH TO TRUSSES w/ (2) - 1/4" LAG SCREWS EA. TRUSS PLANNING 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING (p)615.244.8170 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry Joe Griffth Signature: Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COMPTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PAN E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 04/08/24= 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. FRAMING DETAILS TOP PLATE TO BEAM CONNECTION 1 11 = 1 1-011 At TYPICAL INLINE HEADER BEAM CONNECTION DETAIL 111 = 1'-011 COLUMN DRAG STRUT DETAIL "S-2" N.T.S. S4.0 W C( LA E L E I M N u L u _ O i C R a N / H C E V O :s V E H i G1 4A CANOPY (SEE ARCH) T/FRAMING EL. _ 91-01. - - - - - 2x6 @ 16" O.C. (TYP.)- (3) 1/4x4" SDS SCREWS BLOCKING BTWN. STUDS VENEER (SEE ARCH.) SHEATHING PLYWOOD SHEAR PANEL (SEE 7/S4.0) BLOCKING BTWN. STUDS AS REQ'D BY CANOPY VENDOR T/_BEAM EL. _ (3) 1/4x3" SIDS SCREWS 2x6 TIE STUD- B/FRAMING EL. _ 8'-2" SECTION AT FRONT WALL BUMP -OUT 3/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" CAP PLATE COLUMN (SEE PLAN) �i 0 0 0 0 �TYP. CONT. DOUBLE TOP PL. SEE 8/S4.0 FOR BOLTING DETAIL \BEAM (SEE PLAN) AISC STD. SHEAR CONNECTION w/ MAX. NUMBER OF 3/4 A325 BOLTS BEAM MOMENT CONNECTION SCALE: N.T.S. F E 1 2 T/FRAMING EL. _ 977771 SEE 7/S4.0 FOR ADD'L INFO NOT SHOWN PARAPET STUD SEE 6/S4.0 FOR ADD'L 2x6 TIE STUD INTEGRAL w/ TRUSS INFO NOT SHOWN (3) 1/4x4" SIDS SCREWS DECK EDGE NAILING @ 6" O.C. (TYP.) ROOF SHEATHING VENEER (SEE ARCH.) ROOF SHEATHING SHEATHING 2x6 @ 16" O.C. (TYP.) BLOCKING BTWN STUDS AS REQ'D BY CANOPY VENDOR CONT. DOUBLE WOOD TRUSS TOP PLATE (SEE PLAN) T/BEAM EL. _ CONT. DOUBLE CANOPY 12'-0" TOP PLATE (SEE ARCH) CONT. DOUBLE BEAM (SEE PLAN) TOP PLATE SIMPSON A34 w/ (4) #9 TO STUD & (4) #9 SELF - TAPPING SCREWS TO BEAM (SEE PLAN) BEAM B/STL. EL. = HSS7x5 STOREFRONT (SEE ARCH) (3) 2x12 BEAM (SEE S2.0) STOREFRONT (SEE ARCH) SECTION AT DRIVE-THRU 3/4" = 1'-0" TRUSS (SEE PLAN) (3) 2x12 BEAM (SEE S2.0) NOTE: DO NOT DESIGN TRUSSES TO RECEIVE SUPPORT FROM THIS BEAM. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING GRAPHICS 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 (p) 615.244.8170 www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry Joe Griffth Signature: 'ua �11'rr Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COM PTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PA N E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 04/08/24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. FRAMING DETAILS S4.1 A T T 4T ELEVATION ON GRID LINE 'E' 3/8" = 1'-0" T E F M.C. INDICATES MOMENT CONNECTION 911 EL. ?'-0. EL � Y-4" ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING GRAPHICS 2948 SIDCO DRIVE NASHVILLE, TN 37204 (p) 615.244.8170 www.mjmarch.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Larry Joe Griffth tri :aF Signature: - ✓` Date: 04-08-24 License #: 48579 COM PTON ADDY 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PA N E RA BREAD SHELL BUILDING PERMIT SET 04/08/24= 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. FRAMING ELEVATIONS ELEVATION ON GRID LINE '2' �J n n 3/8 _ - 1 -0 ELEVATION ON GRID LINE '1' 3 - 3/8" = 1'-0" S500 -b4 -b4 J W W _J Q W CD � 40�-. � w L'J J CnQ ::D U ,&4 U7 ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING ((f)615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com I hearby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: J i�i�Prt 'u. i ;ZCtF,-- Typed or Printed Name: ROBERT A Date 4�8124 ,' Reg. No. 59661 ENTECH ENGINEERING INC. 5301 VIRGINIA WAY SUITE 140 BRENTWOOD, TN 37027 v. 615.3 73.2 640 f. 615.373.4837 email@entechtn.com entechm.com COMPTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PANERA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN PERMIT SET 04-08.24 This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. ELECTRICAL -b4 -b4 J W W _J Q W CD � 40�-. L'J J CnQ ::D U ,&4 U7 O PLAN NOTES: 1. EXIT SIGN/EMERGENCY HEADS TO BE CONNECTED TO UNSWITCHED CIRCUIT IN TENANT INFILL. 2. LIGHTS TO BE POWERED AS PART OF TENANT INFILL. ROUTE CIRCUIT THRU LIGHTING CONTACTOR AND TIMECLOCK TO FUTURE PANEL USING FEEDER 'B1'. 3. PROVIDE MOTION DETECTOR SWITCH EQUAL TO HUBBELL BUILDING AUTOMATION MODEL 'LHMTS1'. 4. LIGHT TO BE CONNECTED TO CIRCUIT 1N TENANT INFILL. 5. ALL CONDUIT, WIRE, AND J-BOXES SHALL BE RAN TIGHT TO WALL AND STRUCTURE AND OUT OF THE CROSS SECTIONED AREA. COORDINATE ALL REQUIREMENTS WITH SHEET AS2.0. TYPICAL. GENERAL NOTES: A. ALL EXITS, AND EMERGENCY BATTERY PACKS ARE TO BE UNSWITCHED. B. EC TO COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH ALL TRADES. C. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTS. D. ALL FIXTURES ARE PROVIDED BY E.C. (D LP-16 R A r_I El LIGHTING FLOOR PLAN REMOTE EMERGENCY HEADS I X1 0 bTYPICAL 0 1 X1 A UA REMOTE EMERGENCY HEADS X1 ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING ((f)615.244.8141 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com I hearby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: &Lt�a. G 1 F,-- Typed or Printed Name: ROBERT A. Date 44124 Reg. No. 59661 A REMOTE EMERGENCY HEADS )A ENTECH ENGINEERING INC. 5301 VIRGINIA WAY SUITE 140 BRENTWOOD, TN 37027 v. 615.3 73.2 640 f. 615.373.4837 email@entechtn.com entechm.com COMPTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PANERA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN J Q W N N z Q J N z 0 U W Z 3 0 z 0 Q U 0 J PERMIT SET W 4. 0 08.24 a 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. LIGHTING FLOOR PLAN 100 V♦ z 0 N W W W 2 N SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" -b4 -b4 J W W _J Q W CD � 40�-. W J to Q ::D U ,6,4 U7 O PLAN NOTES: 1. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 2. COORDINATE ALL REQUIREMENTS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DRIVE THRU REOUIREMENTS. 3. PROVIDE FEEDER 'D2' FROM RTU TO PANEL. 4. PROVIDE FEEDER '131' TO PANEL. 5. PROVIDE (1) 4" CONDUIT STUBBED UP WITH PULL STRING TO THE CLOSEST GREEN SPACE BELOW GRADE FOR FUTURE ELECTRICAL. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND ALL REOUIREMENTS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 6. PROVIDE A 1" CONDUIT FROM FIRE ALARM DEVICE TO FUTURE FIRE ALARM PANEL. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION OF FIRE ALARM PANEL WITH TENANT DRAWINGS. 7. ALL CONDUIT, WIRE, AND J-BOXES SHALL BE RAN TIGHT TO WALL AND STRUCTURE AND OUT OF THE CROSS SECTIONED AREA. COORDINATE ALL REOUIREMENTS WITH SHEET AS2.0. TYPICAL. 8. PROVIDE FEEDER 'C2' FROM RTU TO PANEL. 9. (2) 2" CONDUITS STUBBED UP INTO WALL WITH PULL STRING TO TELEPHONE AND CABLE SERVICE CONNECTION POINT. COORDINATE EXACT STUB UP LOCATION WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 10. WEATHER PROOF J-BOX AND CONDUIT FOR CONNECTION TO FUTURE SIGN. REFER TO ARCHITECT'S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR EXACT LOCATION(S). COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND ALL REQUIREMENTS WITH TENANT SIGN PACKAGE. 11. PROVIDE A 2" CONDUIT STUBBED UP WITH PULL STRING FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE TO (5) DESIGNATED LOCATIONS WITHIN THE PARKING AREA ISLANDS FOR FUTURE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION OF STUB -UP AND EXACT LOCATIONS OF THE FUTURE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE WITH CIVIL/ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 12. ELECTRICAL SECONDARY TO TRANSFORMER LOCATION. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH CIVIL DRAWINGS AND THE LOCAL POWER COMPANY. 13. PROVIDE (2) 4" CONDUITS FROM DISCONNECT SWITCH TO PANEL. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND ALL REQUIREMENTS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 14. PROVIDE 3/4" STUB FROM 2" BELOW FINISH GRADE, 2" OUT FROM FACE OF CURB. UP TO SINGLE GANG BOX LOCATED 24" AFF. EXTEND 3/4" CONDUIT FROM TOP OF SINGLE GANG BOX TO 11' AFF AND ELBOW OUT OF WALL. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND ALL REQUIREMENTS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING AS2.0. 15. RECEPTACLE FOR IRRIGATION CONTROLLER. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLLER WITH THE IRRIGATION PLANS/ INSTALLER OF THE SYSTEM. 16. WEATHER PROOF J-BOX AND CONDUIT FOR CONNECTION TO FUTURE SPEAKER. REFER TO ARCHITECT'S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR EXACT LOCATION(S). 17. RECEPTACLE (UNPOWERED) PROVIDED WITH RTU. 18. 8"4 "4 " WEATHER PROOF YARD JUNCTION BOX. 19. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND ALL REQUIREMENTS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING AS2.0. GENERAL NOTES: A. EC TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BID AND PRIOR TO ORDERING EOUIPMENT. B. EC TO COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH ALL TRADES. C. REFER TO ARCHITECT'S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL FIXTURES. D. ALL FACEPLATES, RECEPTACLES. AND SWITCHES SHOULD BE WHITE. THEY SHOULD NOT BE PAINTED. E. PROVIDE A PULL STRING IN ALL MULTIUSE OUTLETS. F. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH TENANT DRAWINGS. POWER/SYSTEMS ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8"=1'-O" LOOP DETECTOR W/ 6' LEAD PROVIDED BY LL. INSTALLED BY GC. LOOP DETECTOR W/ 6' LEAD PROVIDED BY LL. INSTALLEc BY GC• 10 �WP C CONNECT DETECTOR LOOP TO FUTURE J-BOX BY TENANT. SEE ARCHITECT'S CONDUIT PLAN. �l CONNECT DETECTOR y LOOP TO FUTURE J-BOX BY TENANT. SEE ARCHITECT'S 3/4" CONDUITS THRU CURB 1 " ATAJ Li 18 � 18 J 2" DATA-"'19 2" POWER K-47 15 600/3F/WP SERVICE DISCONNECT. UTILITY APPROVED - CT CABINET UTILITY APPROVED - METER AND BASE 14 G,WP WP MENU BOARD 1 POWER � 1 " DATA- O7 TYPICAL /bTYPICAL 7 TYPICAL i G,WP POWER/SYSTEMS FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8"=1'-O" ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING ((f)615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com I hearby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: &Lt�a. Typed or Printed Name: ROBERT A. Date 44124 Reg. No. 59669 J Q W PREVIEW BOARD N 600 AMP MAIN BREAKER PANEL PROVIDED BY EC. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH TENANT PLANS. G,WP ENTECH ENGINEERING INC. 5301 VIRGINIA WAY SUITE 140 BRENTWOOD, TN 37027 v. 615.3 73.2 640 f. 615.373.4837 email@entechtn.com entechm.com COMPTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PANERA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN N z Q J N z 0 U W Z 3 0 z 0 Q U 0 J PERMIT SET W 04.08.24 Q 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. POWER/SYSTEMS FLOOR PLAN V♦ z 0 N W H W W 2 N 2mO Al W J CnQ ::::) U ,6,4 U7 3/4" X 10' COPPERWELD GND. ROD. (LIGHTNING PROTECTION). 1 311 36" 24 " C 60" #6 BARE GND. WIRE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT OR CADWELD GND. WIRE TO BASE. 1" CHAMFER ANCHOR BOLTS - USE MFG. TEMPLATE FOR PLACING. GRADE STEEL REINFORCING BARS - 5 #5 VERT. BARS 1N A 16" CIRCLE BRANCH CIRCUIT CONDUIT MINIMUM 2 REQUIRED 3000 PSI CONCRETE 24" D1A. #3 TIES AT 12" O.C. POLE BASE 36 ABOVE GRADE SCALE: NONE C1 G7 MAIN BONDING GND. BUS JUMPER SERVICE ENTRANCE, NEUTRAL BUSZZ TO ALL OTHER WATER MAIN ENTRANCES TO BLDG. STEEL _ -.0111111111 ` TO GAS MAIN - - - ENTRANCE INSIDE BLDG., ABOVE GROUND - - - I— I THE 3/0 AWG OR LARGER BARE COPPER EXTENDING OUT OF THE ' FOOTING CONNECT TO RE-INFORCEMENT ---- - - - - -- MIN -----� 2" 20' MINIMUM DEVELOPED LENGTH LIFER GROUND WALL OF ANY CONSTRUCTION EMT I I PVC CONDUI T I IN SLAB PVC-TO-RGS (OR IMC)— CONDUIT TRANSITION FITTING APPLETON NTCC SERIES - SIZED AS REQUIRED, TYPICAL. GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR DOMESTIC WATER 10'X 3,4' COPPERCLAD MAIN, WITHIN 5ft. DRIVEN GROUND ROD OF ENTRANCE TO ' ` TYPICAL BUILDING, PRIOR TO VALVES CADWELD OR UL LISTED CONNECTION 0,, #6 AWG 6' —0" TO TELEPHONE / MIN. ENTRANCE NOTE: ALL GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTORS �— FOOTING OR CONDUCTORS SHALL BE 3/0 AWG MIN. FOUNDATION ALL METAL CONDUIT SHALL BE BONDED TO TERMINATING BOXES. ABOVE GROUND GAS PIPING SHALL BE TIED TO THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE AS PER NFPA-54. SEPERATE GROUND ROD REQUIRED ONLY IF TELEPHONE SERVICE BOARD IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET FROM ELECTRICAL SERVICE MAIN PANEL. SERVICE ENTRANCE GROUNDING SCALE: NONE -RGS (OR IMC) - ITO-EMT CONDUIT TRANSITION FITTING I (IF APPLICABLE) I I FINISHED FLOOR CONCRETE SLAB RGS (OR IMC) 90 DEG. ELBOW EMERGING FROM SLAB APPLETON LMFL SERIES. CONDUIT TRANSITION: PVC-TO-RGS IN SLAB SCALE: NONE WALL OF ANY - CONSTRUCTION EMT I PVC CONDUIT BELOW SLAB PVC-TO-RGS (OR IMC CONDUIT TRANSITION FITTING APPLETON NTCC SERIES, TYP. RGS (OR IMC)-TO-EMT CONDUIT TRANSITION FITING. (1F APPLICABLE) .I II FINISHED FLOOR CONCRETE SLAB GRADE OR VAPOR BARRIOR RGS (OR IMC) 90 DEG. ELBOW EMERGING FROM SLAB APPLETON LMFL SERIES. CONDUIT TRANSITION: PVC-TO-RGS BELOW SLAB SCALE: NONE BRANCH CIRCUIT AND FEEDER LEGEND FEEDER NO. CONDUIT AND WIRE A2 ''Z' - 2 #12 8 1 #12 GND. B1 3'4'-2#1081 #10GND. B2 3/4" - 3 #10 8 1 #10 GND. C2 1"-3#8&1 #10 GND. D2 1"-396&1 #10GND. D4 1"-2#6&1 #6 GND. E2 1 j�4' - 3 #4 8 1 #8 GND. E4 1" - 2 #4 & 1 #4 GND. S2 2 PARALLEL 3" - 4 #350MCM & 1 #1 GND. S4 2 PARALLEL 3" - 4 #35OMCM EXTERIOR INTERIOR UTILITY APPROVED PANERA CT CABINET/METER. 600A/3F/WP SERVICE ENTRANCE DISCONNECT SWITC USE BUSSMANN LPS-RK-600SP FUS S OR EQUAL UTILITY PAD MOUNTED:::,,, TRANSFORMER 600 AMP COORDINATE ALL REQUIREMENTS WITH POWER COMPANY. EP /TOPR IMARY CONNECTION POINT. COORDINATE ALL REQUIREMENTS WITH THE LOCAL POWER COMPANY. (2) 4" SCHEDULE 80 CONDUITS. COORDINATE EXACT SIZE AND QUANTITY WITH THE LOCAL POWER COMPANY. COORDINATE ALL REQUIREMENTS WITH THE LOCAL POWER COMPANY. 120/208 VOLT93 PHASE94 WIRE ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM ES EEDER 'S4' MIN. #3/0 GND. SEE DETAIL 'C1'. EEDER 'S2' ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING ((f)615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com I hearby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature�okea. Typed or Printed Name: ROBERT A. Date 44124 Reg. No. 59661 EC TO PROVIDE INFINITY ELECTRICAL GEAR WITH 600 AMP MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER PER TENANT'S PLANS. ENTECH ENGINEERING INC. 5301 VIRGINIA WAY SUITE 140 BRENTWOOD, TN 37027 v. 615.3 73.2 640 f. 615.373.4837 email@entechtn.com entechm.com COMPTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PANERA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN J Q W N N Z Q H J N z 0 U W Z 3 0 PERMIT SET W 4. � 0 08-24 Q 24114 0 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. ELECTRICAL LEGENDS & SCHEDULES N Z 0 U) W SCALE: NONE 3mO -b4 -b4 J W W _J Q W CD � 40�-. GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS A. GUARANTEE ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. B. COMPLY WITH THE NEC, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES. C. USE ONLY COPPER CONDUCTORS AS NOTED. MINIMUM SIZE #12 AWG. USE TYPE THHN, LION. ALL CIRCUITS SHALL BE COLOR CODED. D. USE MINIMUM 1/2" CONDUIT. USE 3/4" MINIMUM GALVANIZED COATED WITH ASPHALTUM OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC IN CONCRETE BELOW GRADE. FOR PVC, TRANSITION TO RIGID BEFORE EMERGING FROM BELOW. USE EMT WHERE CONCEALED IN WALLS AND CEILINGS. USE RIGID IN SLAB AND UNDERGROUND. E. USE STAINLESS STEEL DEVICE COVER PLATES, LION. F. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE UL LISTED, COMMERCIAL GRADE. G. USE HUBBELL WIRING DEVICES AS FOLLOWS: SWITCHES - 15 AMP, #1201-1. 1202-I, 1203-1 SWITCHES - 20 AMP, #1221-1. 1222-I, 1223-1. 1224-I SWITCHES - MOTOR STARTERS, USE SQUARE D CLASS 2510 RECEPTACLES - 15 AMP, #5252-I. 5262-1 FOR GENERAL PURPOSES. RECEPTACLES - 20 AMP, SG63H-I FOR SAFETY TYPE. RECEPTACLES - GFCI, GF5262-1 (15A), GF5362-1 (20A). H. ALL WIRING MUST BE IN CONDUIT. I. EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE MUST BE WEATHERPROOF. USE HEAVY DUTY DISCONNECT SWITCHES. J. CONDUIT OUTSIDE MUST BE GALVANIZED STEEL OR PVC, AS NOTED ABOVE. K. USE 6' MAXIMUM LENGTH OF FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO FIXTURES. L. FLUORESCENT FIXTURES SHALL HAVE HOLD DOWN CLIPS. M. REMOVE TEMPORARY WIRING UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. REMOVE UNUSED EXISTING WIRING UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. N. USE BUSS TYPE LPS OR LPN FUSES FOR MOTORS AND EQUIPMENT. USE BUSS TYPE KTS OR KTN FUSES FOR PANEL AND TRANSFORMER FEEDERS. 0. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED BY OWNER PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN. P. FLUORESCENT LAMPS SHALL BE ENERGY SAVING TYPE T8, 3500 DEGREES KELVIN, LION. PHILLIPS, GENERAL ELECTRIC, OR SYLVANIA. Q. FLUORESCENT FIXTURES SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH ENERGY SAVING ELECTRONIC BALLASTS. R. METAL HALIDE LAMPS SHALL BE GENERAL ELECTRIC OR SYLVANIA. S. USE "PATE" PIPE SEALS FOR CONDUIT THROUGH ROOF. USE SEALTITE FLEXIBLE CONDUIT FOR EXTERIOR EQUIPMENT. T. PANELBOARDS SHALL BE GENERAL ELECTRIC OR SQUARE D. LION. U. VERIFY LOCATION OF PANELBOARDS AND SWITCHES WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN. V. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE NEW SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WITH THE LOCAL POWER COMPANY AND FURNISH THEM LOAD INFORMATION. FURNISH SERVICE TO TRANSFORMER AS REQUIRED BY THE POWER COMPANY. W. DO NOT INSTALL MORE CONDUCTORS IN A BRANCH CIRCUIT HOMERUN THAN SHOWN. X. ALL WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. Y. INSTALL CONTROL WIRING IN MINIMUM 1/2" CONDUIT FOR ALL HVAC UNITS TO THERMOSTATS AND ROOFTOP UNITS, ETC. SEE MECHANICAL CONTROL AND MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS. Z. USE SEALTITE FLEXIBLE CONDUIT FOR EXTERIOR EQUIPMENT. AA. AIR COOLED DRY TYPE TRANSFORMER SHALL BE SQUARE D OR GENERAL ELECTRIC. TRANSFORMER IS TO MEET NEMA ST20 WITH RATINGS AS INDICATED. EQUIP FOR MOUNTING AS INDICATED. BB. LIGHTING CONTACTORS ARE TO BE 20A NEMA ICS2, MECHANICALLY HELD WITH COIL VOLTAGE AS INDICATED. POLES AS INDICATED, PLUS 2 SPARE. ENCLOSURE TO BE ANSI/NEMA ICS 6. TYPE 1. SQUARE D, GENERAL ELECTRIC, AND ASCO ARE ACCEPTABLE. CC. TIME CLOCKS ARE TO BE 40A. NEMA ICS, 7 DAY TIMER WITH ASTRONOMICAL DIAL. PROVIDE WITH 3 POLES IN ANSI/NEMA ICS 6, TYPE 1 ENCLOSURE. ACCEPTABLE ARE TORK W100. DO. PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL SHALL BE FIXED MOUNTED, SPST, WITH 2 MINUTE DELAY AND 2000 WATT CONTACT RATING. INSTALL IN A DIE CAST, WEATHERPROOF ENCLOSURE. EE. RECEPTACLES IN WET LOCATIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH AN OUTLET ENCLOSURE CLEARLY MARKED "SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS WHILE IN USE". THERE MUST BE A GASKET BETWEEN THE ENCLOSURE AND THE MOUNTING SURFACE, AND BETWEEN THE COVER AND BASE TO ASSURE A PROPER SEAL. THE ENCLOSURE MUST EMPLOY STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING HARDWARE AND BE CONSTRUCTED OF IMPACT RESISTANT POLYCARBONATE. THE OUTLET ENCLOSURE SHALL BE LISTED BY UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. ENCLOSURE MUST BE MANUFACTURED BY TAYMAC CORPORATION OR EQUAL. FF. FLUORESCENT LAMP EMERGENCY POWER SUPPLY SHALL BE ONE LAMP AS SCHEDULED ON THE PLANS PROVIDING 1100-1400 LUMENS, MINIMUM. THE BATTERY SHALL BE A NICKEL CADMIUM TYPE, RATED FOR A TEN YEAR LIFE. INCLUDE TEST SWITCH AND AC ON INDICATOR LIGHT, INSTALLED TO BE OPERABLE AND VISIBLE FROM THE OUTSIDE OF AN ASSEMBLED LUMINAIRE. LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE LAMPS TYPE MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER MOUNTING REMARKS VOLT 0TY1 TYPE A PRESCOLITE LC6ML-6LCML30L-40K-8-B6 120 -- 41.5W LED RECESSED DOWNLIGHT,)K**)K Al PRESCOLITE LC6ML-EM-6LCML30L-4OK-8-EM-B6 120 -- 41.5W LED RECESSED DOWNLIGHT, WITH BATTERY SA WLS LIGHTING (2)C-1-132-4K7-50W-UNV-A- -SLW 208 2 135W LED'S ON 22' POLE WITH PARKING LOT LIGHT ON 22' POLE 3' BASE (2@180) SB WLS LIGHTING C-1-132-4K7-4F-UNV-A--HSS- 208 1 135W LED'S ON 22' POLE WITH PARKING LOT LIGHT 90-B-SLW ON 22' POLE 3' BASE (1@90) X DUAL LITE LE-C-S-R-W-E-1 ARROWS 8 FACES 120 -- LED'S UNIVERSAL EXIT WITH AS NOTED EMERGENCY BATTERY X1 DUAL LITE EVC-U-R-W-D4-0-EVO-D-B 120 -- LED'S UNIVERSAL EXIT COMBO W/EMERG. REMOTE HEADS/BATTERY COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. COLOR SELECTED BY ARCHITECT PROVIDED WITH CANOPY COORDINATE FIXTURE WITH CANOPY PRIOR TO ODERING GENERAL ELECTRICAL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MTG. HGT. Q CEILING OUTLET, SURFACE FIXTURE ® CEILING OUTLET, SURFACE FIXTURE w/BATTERY BACK UP 0 CEILING OUTLET, RECESSED FIXTURE e CEILING OUTLET, RECESSED FIXTURE w/BATTERY BACK UP Q-I BRACKET OUTLET SURFACE FLUORESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURE RECESSED FLUORESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURE FLUORESCENT STRIP LIGHT FIXTURE ® EXIT LIGHT, ARROWS AS SHOWN, ON LIFE SAFETY CIRCUIT EMERGENCY LIGHT WALL MOUNTED AT 7'-G" AFF, LION S SINGLE POLE SWITCH 48" AFF S3 THREE-WAY SWITCH 48" AFF S4 FOUR-WAY SWITCH 48" AFF DUPLEX GROUNDING RECEPTACLE 18" AFF DUPLEX GROUNDING RECEPTACLE ABC Q FLOOR RECEPTACLE DOUBLE DUPLEX GROUNDING RECEPTACLE 18" AFF 1Q JUNCTION OR PULL BOX MOTOR, E.F. DENOTES EXHAUST FAN SM MANUAL MOTOR STARTER OR RELAY CONTROL ® MAGNETIC MOTOR STARTER OR TERMINAL CONNECTION =J_J SAFETY SWITCH, WP INDICATES NEMA 3R, FUSED, U.O.N. ® LIGHTING OR POWER PANEL ® MAIN OR SUB -DISTRIBUTION PANEL IT TIME CLOCK - SEE SPECS © CONTACTOR - SEE SPECS PE PHOTO -ELECTRIC SWITCH - AIM NORTHEAST, SEE SPECS QT THERMOSTAT, SEE MECHANICAL CONDUIT, CONCEALED IN CEILING OR WALL - - - CONDUIT, CONCEALED IN SLAB OR BELOW FLOOR/GRADE - - - - - - CONDUIT, EXPOSED 0 CONDUIT, TURNING UP 0 CONDUIT, TURNING DOWN - EP - CONDUIT, ELECTRICAL PRIMARY - ES - CONDUIT, ELECTRICAL SECONDARY WP WEATHERPROOF G GROUND FAULT CURRENT INTERRUPTING AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR ABC ABOVE COUNTER UC UNDERCOUNTER LION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR MC MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR EC ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR EDF ELECTRIC DRINKING FOUNTAIN WH WATER HEATER RTU ROOF TOP UNIT 1 Q S FIRE ALARM DUCT MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTOR -BY MC ® MULTI USE OUTLET FOR VOICE, DATA, VIDEO (1% . TO ABOVE CEILING) 18" AFF ®W TELEPHONE OUTLET, WALL MOUNTED 48" AFF ® MULTI USE OUTLET FOR VOICE, DATA, VIDEO ABOVE COUNTER (1"C.TO ABOVE CEILING) ABC ® MULTI USE FLOOR OUTLET, SEE SPECS BOLLARD STYLE AREA LIGHTING FIXTURE BRANCH CIRCUITING LEGEND s A-1 ONE 1-POLE CKT HOMERUN TO PANEL A ►► A-1.3 TWO 1-POLE CKT HOMERUNS TO PANEL A ►►► A-1.3.5 THREE 1-POLE CKT HOMERUNS TO PANEL A A-1/3 ONE 2-POLE CKT HOMERUN TO PANEL A �► A-1/3.2/4 TWO 2-POLE CKT HOMERUNS TO PANEL A A-1/3/5 ONE 3-POLE CKT HOMERUN TO PANEL A NOTE: ALL MULTI -WIRE BRANCH CIRCUITS TO COMPLY WITH 2O20 NEC 210.4 ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING ((f)615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com I hearby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: &WP a. i2&ZttF,—_ Typed or Printed Name: ROBERT A. Date 44124 Reg. No. 59661 ENTECH ENGINEERING INC. 5301 VIRGINIA WAY SUITE 140 BRENTWOOD, TN 37027 v. 615.3 73.2 640 f. 615.373.4837 email@entechtn.com entechm.com COMPTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PANERA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN J Q W U) W Z 3 0 Z 0 /Q V 0 J PERMIT SET W 04.08.24 Q 24114 0 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. ELECTRICAL LEGENDS & SCHEDULES N Z 0 N W E4.0 H W W 2 N �94 -b4 -b4 J W W _J Q L - CD w J CnQ ::D U ,6,4cn SECTION 15050 - BASIC MATERIALS AND METHODS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 REGULATORY REOUIREMENTS A. Conform to 2017 International Building Code, Mechoncial Code and 2012 Energy Conservation Code. 1.2 TRANSPORTATION AND HANDLING A. Transport and handle Products in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Promptly inspect shipments to ensure that Products comply with requirements, quantities are correct. and Products are undamaged. C. Provide equipment and personnel to handle Products by methods to prevent soiling. disfigurement, or damage. 1.3 STORAGE AND PROTECTION A. Store and protect Products in accordance with manufacturers' instructions, with seals and labels intact and legible. B. Store sensitive Products in weather tight, climate controlled enclosures. C. For exterior storage of fabricated Products, place on sloped supports, above ground. D. Provide bonded off -site storage and protection when site does not permit on - site storage or protection. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 MECHANICAL IDENTIFICATION A. Plastic Nameplates and Togs: Laminated three -toyer plastic. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLATION A. Install plastic nameplates with adhesive. B. Install plastic togs with corrosion resistant metal chain. 3.2 TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING A. Report Forms: AABC National Standards for Total System Balance forms. B. Air Handling Systems: Adjust to within plus or minus 5 percent for supply systems and plus or minus 10 percent for return and exhaust systems of design. C. Air Outlets and Inlets: Adjust to within plus or minus 10 percent of design. D. T.A.B. Contractor shall be AABC or NEBB certified. SECTION 15250 - MECHANICAL INSULATION PART 1 GENERAL NOT USED PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 DUCTWORK INSULATION A. Flexible Glass Fiber: Flexible. noncombustible blonket with vapor barrier locket. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLATION A. External Ductwork Insulation 1. Provide cold ductwork with vapor barrier jacket. Seal vapor barrier penetrations with vapor barrier adhesive. 2. Interior exposed ductwork. rigid duct board. finish with canvas jacket sized for finish painting. 3. Exterior ductwork, rigid duct board, finish with aluminum locket. 3.2 SCHEDULES A. Ductwork Insulation Thickness Finish 1. Flexible Gloss Fiber Inch Exhaust Ducts Within 10 ft 1-1/2" FSK of Exterior Openings Supply Ducts 1-1/2" FSK Return Ducts 1-1/2" FSK Exterior Supply & Return Ducts 2" FSK SECTION 15780 PACKAGED AIR CONDITIONING UNITS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Required. B. Shop Drawings: Required. C. Project Record Documents: Required. 1.2 WARRANTY A. Special Warranty for refrigeration compressors and heat exchangers: 5 years. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 PACKAGED ROOF TOP AIR CONDITIONING UNITS A. Manufacturers: 1. Lennox. 1. Carrier. B. Unit: Self-contained, packaged, factory assembled and prewired unit, consisting of cabinet and from, supply fan, heat exchanger and burner, controls, air filters, refrigerant cooling coil and compressor, condenser coil and condenser fan. C. Cabinet Access Panels: Ouick fasteners screwdriver operated flush cam type or locking door handle type with piano hinges. D. Heat Exchangers: Welded aluminized steel. E. Air Filters: Two inch thick glass fiber disposable media in metal fromes. F. Roof Mounting Curb: 18 inches high galvanized steel channel frame with gaskets and nailer strips. G. Gas Burner: Atmospheric type burner with intermittent spark or glow coil ignition. H. Evaporator Coil: Copper tube aluminum fin coil assembly with capillary tubes or thermostatic expansion valves. I. Compressor: Hermetic or semi -hermetic compressor. 3600 rpm. resiliently mounted with positive lubrication, crankcase heater. high and low pressure safety controls. motor overload protection, suction and discharge service valves and gage ports. J. Condenser Coil: Copper tube aluminum fin coil assembly with coil guard, direct drive propeller fans, fan guard. Provide refrigerant pressure switches or outdoor thermostat to cycle fans. K. Dampers: Provide outside air dampers with damper operator and control pockage to automatically open dampers during occupied periods. L. Thermostat: Electric solid state microcomputer based room thermostat, with remote sensor. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLATION A. Provide initial start-up during first year of operation. B. Mount roof mounted units on factory built roof mounting frame. C. Pipe drain pan condensate to nearest drain. SECTION 15880 - AIR DISTRIBUTION PART 1 GENERAL NOT USED PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 DUCTWORK A. Materials 1. Steel Ducts: Galvanized steel sheet, lock -forming quality. 2. Flexible Ducts: Fabric supported by helically wound spring steel wire or flat steel bands. B. Metal Ductwork 1. Fabricate and support in accordance with SMACNA HVAC Duct Construction Standards - Metal and Flexible. 2. Construct T's, bends, and elbows with radius of 1-1/2 times width of duct on center line or provide turning vones. 3. Increase duct sizes gradually. not exceeding 30 degrees divergence and 45 degrees convergence. 2.2 DUCT ACCESSORIES A. Volume Control Dampers 1. Fabrication: SMACNA HVAC Duct Construction Standards - Metal and Flexible. 2. Splitter Dampers: Some gage as duct to 24 inches size and two gages heavier for larger sizes. 3. Single Blade Dampers: Fabricate for duct sizes to 12 x 30 inch. 4. End Bearings: Provide except in round ductwork 12 inches and smaller. 5. Cuodrants: Provide locking, indicating regulators on dampers. Where width exceeds 30 inches provide regulator at both ends. B. Backdraft Dampers: Fabricate multi -blade, parallel action gravity balanced bockdraft dampers of galvanized steel or extruded aluminum, with center pivoted blades linked together. C. Flexible Duct Connections: UL listed fire -retardant neoprene coated woven gloss fiber fabric to NFPA 90A. approximately 3 inches wide. crimped into metal edging strip. D. Duct Access Doors 1. Fabricate in accordance with SMACNA HVAC Duct Construction Standards - Metal and Flexible. 2. Access doors smaller than 12 inches square may be secured with sash locks. Access doors with sheet metal screw fasteners are not acceptable. 2.3 AIR OUTLETS & INLETS A. Ceiling Diffusers: MetolAire 5600-6. Rectonggular, stamped or spun. multi -core type diffuser to discharge air in 360 degree pattern, with sectorizing baffles where indicated; radial opposed blade damper: baked enamel off-white finish. B. Registers/Grilles: MetolAire CC5D. Fixed grilles of 1/2 x 1/2 x 1/2 inch louvers: with factory off-white finish. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLATION A. Provide bockdraft dampers on discharge of exhaust fans. B. Connect diffusers to low pressure ducts with 5 feet maximum length of flexible duct. C. Provide flexible connections immediately adjacent to equipment in ducts associated with fans and motorized equipment. D. Provide duct access doors for inspection and cleaning before and after filters, coils, fans, automatic dompers,ot fire dampers, and elsewhere as indicated. E. Check location of air outlets and inlets and make necessary adjustments in position to conform with architectural features, symmetry, and lighting arrangement. F. Provide balancing dampers on duct toke-off to all diffusers, and grilles and registers. G. Point ductwork visible behind air outlets and inlets matte black. H. Seal all ductwork longitudinal and transverse seams and connections with sealant listed and labeled in accordance with UL181A or UL181B. Duct connections to flanges of air distribution systems shall be sealed and mechanically fastened. GENERAL MECHANICAL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SUPPLY DUCTWORK -•-•-•-•-• RETURN DUCTWORK - - - - - - EXHAUST DUCTWORK ® SUPPLY AIR DIFFUSER RETURN OR EXHAUST AIR REGISTER E.W.H. ELECTRIC WALL HEATER ♦ UNDERCUT DOOR 3'48110 200 81 NECK SUPPLY AIR DIFFUSER @ 200 C.F.M. 15 OR 8"X8" RETURN AIR REGISTER @ 150 C.F.M. 100E 616" EXHAUST AIR REGISTER @ 100 C.F.M. TO SPACE THERMOSTAT MOUNTING HEIGHT PER ADA (48" AFF) MISUPPLY DUCT THRU SLAB OR ROOF - SEE PLANS RETURN OR EXHAUST DUCT THRU SLAB OR ROOF - SEE PLANS SD DUCT SMOKE DETECTOR PACKAGED AC UNIT SCHEDULE UNIT DESIGNATION RTU#1 & RTU#2 RTU#3 TYPE GAS - DOWNSHOT GAS - DOWNSHOT SERVICE SEE PLANS - REAR SEE PLANS - FRONT ACCESSORIES 1O 1O ECONOMIZER YES - ENTHALPY YES - ENTHALPY CURB YES - 18" YES - 18" FILTERS 2" T.A. - 30% 2" T. A. - 30% SUPPLY FAN DIRECT DRIVE DIRECT DRIVE TOTAL C.F.M. 2,000 4,000 O.A. MINIMUM TBD(TIl TBD(TIl EXTERNAL S.P. 0.8 0.8 H.P. 1.22 HP 2.63 BHP VOLTAGE 208/3/60 208/3/60 HEATING COIL --- --- FUEL NATURAL GAS - 2 STAGE NATURAL GAS - 2 STAGE HEATING CAP. INPUT - MBH 110 224 HEATING CAP. OUTPUT - MBH 88 184 COOLING COIL --- --- TOT/SENS CAP. (MBH) 59 128 E.A.D.B./E.A.W.B. 80/67 80/67 CONDENSING SECTION --- --- COMP. R.L.A. - - COND.FANS F.L.A. - - UNIT M.C.A./M.O.C.P. 31/45 50/60 VOLTAGE 208/3/60 208/3/60 0.A.D.B. 95 95 MIN. E.E.R./I.E.E.R. 14 (SEER) 11.0/12.8 DIMENSIONS - - WEIGHT 651 1083 MANUFACTURER CARRIER CARRIER MODEL # 48TCEEE06 48TCEEE12 1O ACCESSORIES MULTI -SPEED BELT DRIVE, LOW AMBIENT KIT, HUMIDITY CONTROL, HOT GAS REHEAT LOW LEAK, FDD & BAROMETRIC RELIEF, DUCT MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTORS IN SUPPLY AND RETURN AIR, CONDENSER COIL HAIL GUARD. FACTORY UNIT MOUNTED RECEPT FOR WIRING BY TENANT E.C. VERIFY SIZE WITH TENANT PLANS PRIOR TO PURCHASE. EXHAUST FAN SCHEDULE UNIT DESIGNATION EF#1 EF#2 EF#3 EF#4 TYPE CENTRIFUGAL UPBLAST CENTRIFUGAL UPBLAST CENTRIFUGAL CABINET CENTRIFUGAL UPBLAST SERVICE FUTURE RACK OVEN FUTURE DISHWASHER FUTURE OVEN EXHAUST FUTURE RESTROOMS C.F.M. 690 400 200 150 STATIC PRESSURE 1.0 1.0 0.375 0.375 H.P. 1/2 HP 1/3 HP 1/30 HP 1/30 HP VOLTAGE 120/1/60 120/1/60 120/1/60 120/1/60 ACCESSORIES ROOF CURB ROOF CURB ROOF CURB ROOF CURB MANUFACTURER CAPTIVEAIRE CAPTIVEAIRE GREENHECK GREENHECK MODEL # *DU50 HFA??? *DU30 HFA??? GC-662??? G-085??? *COORDINATE WITH CAPTIVE AIRE - PANERA NATIONAL ACCOUNT - NO SUBSTITUTIONS. A2 OA AIR CONDITIONING DRAIN SHALL BE F( OF UNIT CONNECT[( UNLESS OTHERWISE VENT & CLEAN -OUT DO NOT SEAL CAP CAP SHALL HAVE I'l HOLE IN CENTER SLOPE AT MINIMUM OF PER FOOT ROUTE UCS PIPE TO ROOF DRAIN OR GUTTER NOTE: 'H' DIMENSION SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2" OR EQUAL TO THE NEGATIVE FAN INLET PRESSURE (RETURN AIR GRILLE, DUCT, FILTERS, AND COILS). CONDENSATE DRAIN FROM DRAW-THRU UNITS SCALE: NONE EXT. PANEL WIND RESTRI DESIGNED PE ROOFING MAT AND FLASHIN BY ARCHITEC RIGID INSUL METAL DECKI WELDED PLAT REO'D FOR S TYP. DUCT FE.HIYIi IYV MEMBERS - SEE STRUCTURAL DETAILS MOTORIZED DAMPER SUPPLY COND. COILS FAN J W W/COIL GUARDS CD fd o a` z U O Q _ J U w O - x F­_ o w J Q U 0-1 w CD c� a z w 7_ w Q N w a 0 5HU1 UUWN FANS SEQUENCE OF OPERATION: 1. OCCUPIED MODE: FAN ON & O.A. OPEN 2. UNOCCUPIED MODE: FAN CYCLES & O.A. CLOSED NOTES: 1. CONFIRM # OF STAGES & EXACT WIRING WITH MANUFACTURER. 2. S.D. SHALL BE EQUAL TO SIMPLEX 120 VOLT W/SAMPLING TUBE N.C. CONTACTS AND REMOTE INDICATOR. PACKAGED AC UNIT ROOFTOP A.C. UNIT CURB SCALE: NONE CONDENSOR FAN(S) Z C G W2 W1 Y2 Y1 R I hearby cerl me or under my dire) Profess na i e Signature Date 4 8 24 DUCT FLASHING INSULATION (SAME AS STRUCTURE) METAL DECKING FLEX. CONN. TYP. S. S.D. CONTACT UNIT MTD. DISC. SWITCH WALL MOUNTED PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTAT-ENERSTAT DSL-700 R DIGITAL SET -POINT Y1 DUCT MOUNTED Y2 H w1 REMOTE SENSORS W2 W/SETPOINT ADJ. T c & OCCUPANCY _ OVERRIDE AUx _ VENTILATION RELAY: O.A. DAMPER CONTACT E.F. CONTACT FROM UNIT POWER COORDINATE VOLTAGE J CONTROL SCHEMATIC NO SCALE ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING ((f)615.244.81410 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com ify that this Ian,s cification,or report was prepared by A supe an th t I am a duly Licensed d e state of Minnesota. Typed or Printed Name:MITCHELL D. SIMPSON Reg. No. 42082 ENTECH ENGINEERING INC. 5301 VIRGINIA WAY SUITE 140 BRENTWOOD, TN 37027 v. 615.3 73.2 640 f. 615.373.4837 email@entechtn.com entechm.com COMPTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PANERA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN PERMIT SET 04-08.24 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. HVAC - SCHEDULES AND DETAILS J W N W Z J D W Z 0 U W Z 3 0 Z 0 Q U 0 J N Z 0 IIIIIIIIII. N W END OF OUTLINE C3 M 1 0 1 -b4 -b4 J W W _J Q W CD � 40�-. �� LLJ J �Q U U7 GENERAL HVAC NOTES: A. COORDINATE DUCTWORK WITH ALL TRADES PRIOR TO FABRICATION. SUBMIT ANY MAJOR CHANGES IN DUCT ROUTING OR DUCT SIZING AS A SHOP DRAWING TO THE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. B. COORDINATE CEILING AIR INLETS AND OUTLETS WITH REFLECTED CEILING PLAN. DO NOT LOCATE ANY AIR OUTLETS WITHIN 3 FEET OF CEILING SMOKE DETECTORS. C. MAINTAIN CLEARANCES FROM ELECTRICAL PANELS AS REQUIRED BY N.E.C. D. MAINTAIN CLEARANCES FOR SERVICE OF HVAC EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY MANUFACTURER AND NEC 110.26. PROVIDE MECHANICAL ROOM SHOP DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED FOR COORDINATION. E. REFERENCE CONTROL SCHEMATICS & DUCTWORK DETAILS FOR MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC DAMPER LOCATIONS. F. FINAL RTU SELECTION AND LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED WITH THE TENANT DRAWINGS IF AVAILABLE PRIOR TO ORDERING AND INSTALLATION. G. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION OF RTU WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. O HVAC PLAN NOTES: 1. PROVIDE ROOF PENETRATION WITH PROPER SUPPORT FOR FUTURE EXHAUST FAN. TENANT TO PROVIDE EXHAUST FAN AND CURB. COORDINATE EXACT SIZE AND LOCATION W/ARCH PLANS. CONTACT TENANT REP TO COORDINATE SHIPMENT OF CURBS W/INSTALLATION TIME LINE. 2. PROVIDE UNIT WITH DUCT MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTOR MOUNTED IN THE SUPPLY 8 RETURN AIR DUCT FOR UNIT SHUTDOWN. 3. PROVIDE ALL UNITS IN THIS SPACE W/ ENERSTAT DSL-700 DIGITAL SET —POINT THERMOSTATS AND REMOTE SENSORS AND PROVIDE 100 FEET OF WIRE FOR EACH DEVICE COILED UP IN CEILING. 4. EXTEND SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS VERTICALLY BELOW ROOF DECK FOR TENANT EXTENSION. El EF#3 Q OUTLET EF#2 'I a gel II ,� II II II,� II II II�� II II 4u �u 1 r========r— I II 'I II II II II Ih III I u III II I III II'' Ili II u h II I ILh o� R T U#�!! 11 — II = _ = = II — — — — _ II I till I II II I II L �I II II I II II II II , II II II I II II , I I I II II II h � I I II II I /i E F #4 iI it 4 it p II 'I II h II 1 II I^ II �I � '✓tl II II � 'I II u !I EF#!�q II II � II II � II II ' II it I h II II I=——— JI—'I= _—————————— _� LE, hil Ij 111 II ,I yiI u�l II Nil II lI I I "II ILm _II N; RTU#2 h�l II II AEI RTU#1 ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING ((f)615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com I hearby certify that this lan,s cification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supe an th t I am a duly Licensed Profess na i er d e state of Minnesota. Signature Typed or Printed Name:MITCHELL D. SIMPSON Date "24 Reg. No. 42082 ENTECH ENGINEERING INC. 5301 VIRGINIA WAY SUITE 140 BRENTWOOD, TN 37027 v. 615.3 73.2 640 f. 615.373.4837 email@entechtn.com entechm.com COMPTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PANERA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN Z a J N z 0 U W Z 3 0 z 0 a U 0 J PERMIT SET W 4. 0 08.24 a 24114 0 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. HVAC FLOOR PLAN N Z 0 U) W OC H W W 2 N H.V.A.C. ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" u u H.V.A.C. FLOOR PLAN M2ml SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0tt -IJ4 -IJ4 _J Q L - CD SECTION 15050 - BASIC MATERIALS AND METHODS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A. Conform to 2017 International Building. Plumbing. Fuel Gas 8 2012 Energy Conservation Codes or as adopted by local AHJ. B. Obtain permits and request inspections from authority having jurisdiction. 1.2 TRANSPORTATION AND HANDLING A. Transport and handle Products in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Promptly inspect shipments to ensure that Products comply with requirements, quantities are correct. and Products are undamaged. C. Provide equipment and personnel to handle Products by methods to prevent soiling, disfigurement. or damage. 1.3 STORAGE AND PROTECTION A. Store and protect Products in accordance with manufacturers' instructions, with seals and labels intact and legible. B. Store sensitive Products in weather tight, climate controlled enclosures. C. For exterior storage of fabricated Products. place on sloped supports. above ground. D. Provide bonded off -site storage and protection when site does not permit on - site storage or protection. 1.4 PROJECT/SITE CONDITIONS. A. Install work in locations shown on drawings unless prevented by Project conditions. Coordinate work with site conditions prior to ordering or fabricating materials. Prepare drawings showing proposed rearrangement of work to meet project conditions, including changes to work specified in other sections. Obtain approval of architect/engineer before proceeding. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 MECHANICAL IDENTIFICATION A. Plastic Nameplates and Togs: Laminated three -layer plastic. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLATION A. Install plastic nameplates with adhesive. B. Install plastic togs with corrosion resistant metal chain. SECTION 15250 - MECHANICAL INSULATION PART 1 GENERAL NOT USED PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 PIPE INSULATION A. Gloss Fiber: Rigid molded, noncombustible with vapor barrier jacket. B. Cellular Foam: Flexible. cellular elostomeric. molded or sheet. C. Jackets 1. PVC Plastic: One piece molded type fitting covers. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLATION A. Piping Insulation 1. Provide cold pipes with vapor barrier jackets. Insulate complete system. 2. Provide hot pipes with standard jackets. Bevel and seal ends of insulation of equipment, flanges. and unions. 3. Interior exposed piping - canvas jacket and fitting covers. 4. Route insulation through pipe hangers as calcium silicate or galvanized steel shield for proper support. 3.2 SCHEDULES (sizes listed are minimum and shall also comply with locally adopted energy code) A. Piping Insulation Pipe Size Thickness Inch Inch 1. Glass Fiber or Cellular Foam Insulation Domestic Cold Water oil sizes l," to* to* Domestic Hot Water 8 recirc all sizes 1� � J Floor Drains above rode all sizes 112 9 z Q U 2. Cellular Foam Insulation Water Buried in concrete all sizes 1,2 SECTION 15400 - PLUMBING PART 1 GENERAL NOT USED PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 PIPING A. Sanitary Sewer Buried and Above Grade: Cast Iron Pipe, service weight or P.V.C. schedule 40 B. Water Buried Under Building: Copper tube. Type K. annealed. C. Water Above Grade: 1. Copper tube, Type L. hard drown. D. Natural Gas: Steel, Schedule 40 Block. Threaded or Welded. Buried shall be welded with owwo C105 polyethylene jacket. 2.2 VALVES A. BALL VALVES: NIBCO MILWAUKEE HAMMOND (screwed) 2" 8 smaller T585-70 BA-300 8300 (solder) 1" 8 smaller S-585-70 A-150 8311 B. PLUG VALVES 1. Manufactures: A. DeZurik Permoseol. B. Other manufactures offering equivalent products will be considered. C. WATER PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES 1. Manufactures: A. Watts B. Other acceptable manufactures offering equivalent products. 1. Mueller 2. Wilkins. 2. Up to 2 inches: Bronze body, stainless steel and thermoplastic internal parts, fabric reinforced diaphragm, strainer. threaded and single union ends. D. STRAINERS 1. Manufactures: A. Watts B. Other acceptable manufactures offering equivalent products. 1. Muller 2. Wilkins 2. Size 2 inch and Under: Screwed brass or iron body for 175 psig working pressure. Y pattern withit32inch stainless steel perforated screen. 2.4 PLUMBING FIXTURES A. See PLUMBING FIXTURE SCHEDULE B. Manufacturers: 1. Wall Hydrants/Hose Bibs a) Zurn. b) J.R. Smith. c ) J osom. d) Watts. e) Woodford. 2.5 EOUIPMENT A. Backflow Preventer. 1. ANSI/ASSE 1013, AWWA C506: bronze body with bronze and plastic internal parts and stainless steel springs: two independently operating spring looded check volves:diaphrogm type differential pressure relieve valve between checks. 2. Manufacturers: Watts. Wilkens/Zurn. or Febco. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLATION A. Provide dielectric connections wherever jointing dissimilar metals. B. Use dielectric connections only in accessible locations. C. Install unions downstream of valves and at equipment or apparatus connections. D. Install ball valves for shut-off and to isolate equipment, part of systems, or vertical risers. E. Install plug valves for shut-off and to isolate equipment, port of systems, or vertical risers in fuel gas systems. UNION GAS COCK GAS MAIN V COORDINATE CONNECTION TO EQUIPMENT W/EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER I� MAIN x MAIN x EQUIP. SIZE CONNECTION REDUCING TEE - DIRT LEG WITH CAPPED END TYPICAL GAS CONNECTION DETAIL SCALE: NONE PIPE SIZE SUPPORT DISTANCE 1 '2 6' 3/4„ $, ill 10' 11/4, 8 LARGER LOOSE FIT STRAP REDWOOD BLOCK SET - ON ROOF SEAL LAYER WITH ROOF CEMENT PLAN NOTE: GAS PIPING ON ROOF SHALL BE COATED WITH BITUMASTIC COAL TAR EPDXY GAS PIPE 1 PLASTIC SUPPORT NA I L TO 1 "x 12 "x 12" ELEVATION GAS PIPING ON ROOF DETAIL SCALE: NONE ROOF REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER SCHEDULE DESIGNATION QUANTITY SERVING G.P.M. P.D. (psig) MANUFACTURER MODEL NUMBER REMARKS RPBP#1 1 DOMESTIC TBD 10 WATTS 909-S-QT 2" RPBP#2 1 DOMESTIC TBD 10 WATTS 909-S-QT 3/4" NOTES: 1) ALL PIPING TO BE RIGIDLY SUPPORTED. 2) COORDINATE CONFIGURATION WITH LOCAL WATER UTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS. 3) COORDINATE ORIENTATION OF EQUIPMENT W/TI PLANS. PRESSURE GAUGE WATER METER IN ACCORANCE 2" C.W. TO BLDG. WITH LOCAL WATER UTILITY PRESSURE GAUGE DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM LM- COMPANY REQUIREMENTS (TYP-2) (TYP.) IF UTILITY DOESN'T ALLOW FOR DEDICATED IRRIGATION METER, PRESSURE REGULATING DELETE 8 TAP IRRIGATION DOWNSTREAM OF RPBP#1. / VALVES IF PRESSURE [S GREATER THAN RPBP#1 70 PSI M I� FULL SIZE DRAIN PORT CONNECTION M SERVICE MAIN SHUT-OFF VALVE RPBP#2 FUTURE FD BY TENANT FINISHED FLOOR OR PIPE OUTSIDE I UNION (TYP.) I J'V TERMINATE R.P.B.P. DRAIN _ ABOVE FLOOR DRAIN AT TWICE THE DIAMETER OF 2" WATER SERVICE. SEE R.P.B.P. DRAIN PORT SIZE 1" C.W. TO IRRIGATION SYSTEM SITE UTILITY PLANS FOR (ALT.ROUTING TO OUTSIDE) & HYDRANT AT DUMPSTER (SEE CIVIL) CONTINUATION R.P.B.P. No. 1 & 2 REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER DETAIL SCALE: NONE NOTE: R.P.B.P. MANUFACTURER AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY LOCAL 8 STATE AUTHORITIES. B 3 ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 ENGINEERING ((f)615.244.81411 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com I hearby certify that this lams cification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supe an th t I am a duly Licensed Profess na i er d e state of Minnesota. Signature Typed or Printed Name:MITCHELL D. SIMPSON Date "24 Reg. No. 42082 PLUMBING LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION ABBREVIATIONS • COLD WATER (UNDERGROUND) C.O. C.O. CLEAN -OUT C.O. E.C.O. EXTERIOR CLEAN -OUT C.O. - - - - - -SS - - - - - - SANITARY SEWER (UNDERGROUND) SS SANITARY SEWER S.S. -----------------0V.T.R. VENT THROUGH THE ROOF V.T.R. G NATURAL GAS G 4 RISER IDENTIFICATION 0 P-1 FIXTURE IDENTIFICATION (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) f PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE P.R.V. GAS VALVE (PLUG COCK) G/W GREASE WASTE G.W. 3" VENT (MIN.) INLET HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC RATED CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER 20" MINIMUM OPENING (SQUARE OR ROUND) GROUTE INTO PLACE. (TYP.) 4" OPEN TOP SAN. TEE (TYP.) 4" MIN. PIPE SIZE (TYP.) 2" MINIMUM XXXX GALLON PRE -CAST CONC. SEPTIC TANK (DESIGNED FOR HEAVY TRAFFIC LOADING) iO3 MIN. „ O i ii i L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i L - - - - - - - - J VENT 9" MIN. 2" MIN 12" MIN. EQ. 2'-6" MIN. _ 6l-011 MAX. EQ. 5' MIN. CONC.---, OR BRICK RISER PIPE MINrrLL 12" MIN 15" MIN 3" MIN. OUTLET FINISHED GRADE (REF.) 4" TO SAN. SEWER SYSTEM. 4" SANITARY ELBOW MIN. 2/3 OF CAPACITY "'-1/3 OF CAPICITY MIN. (500 GAL. MIN.) MAX. (250 GAL. MIN.) DESIGNER'S NOTE: STANDARD SIZES ARE 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000 GALLON, ETC. 750 AND 1000 GALLON STOCK SIZES. CONSULT LOCAL AND STATE SIZING STANDARDS ON PER JOB BASIS. GREASE TRAP DETAIL SCALE: NONE TRAP SIZING AND SPECIFIC DETAILS SHALL BE DETERMINED DURING TENANT BUILDOUT PHASE OF DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION ENTECH ENGINEERING INC. 5301 VIRGINIA WAY SUITE 140 BRENTWOOD, TN 37027 v. 615.3 73.2 640 f. 615.373.4837 email@entechtn.com entechm.com COMPTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PANERA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN J W N N J Z 0 V W Z 3 0 Z 0 /Q V 0 J PERMIT SET W 4. 0 08.24 Q 24114 0 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action. PLUMBING SCHEDULES AND DETAILS P 1 . 1 H W W 2 N GAS PIPING DOWN TO METER 2-1/2"G 2 3 2-1 /2"G G4 G5 c� CN 1-1 v- 1"G 1-1/4"G RTU#3 RTU#2 RTU#1 GAS SERVICE MAIN — COORD. W/CIVIL UTILITY PLAN & LOCAL GAS UTILITY CO. (1,600 MBH @ 9"-12" W.C.) GAS SERVICE METER 8 PRV COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GAS UTILITY COMPANY ROUTE GAS LINE FROM CONNECTION AT TENANT GAS METER/P.R.V. UP BESIDE WALL TO ROOF. SECURELY ANCHOR GAS LINE TO WALL. NATURAL GAS CONNECTION SCHEDULE ITEM GX DESCRIPTION EQUIP. LOAD AT 7" W.C. REMARKS U.O.N. G1 RTU-1 110 C.F.H. PIPING SIZED FOR: PRESSURE = 7"WC G2 RTU-2 110 C.F.H. LONGEST RUN = 100 FT. LOADS SHALL BE G3 RTU-3 224 C.F.H. COORDINATED WITH PANERA G4 WATER HEATER 597 C.F.H. T.I. PLANS G5 OVENS 400 C.F.H. TOTAL ADDITIONAL DEMAND LOAD = I 1,441 C.F.H. El 2—WAY —4"SS —EC�O� EF#4 I — ^ 4" SANITARY WASTE TO CITY SERVICE; SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR CONTINUATION. 2—WAY —4"GW —ECO� 4" GREASE WASTE TO GREASE TRAP; SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR CONTINUATION. L — — EF#1 GENERAL PLUMBING NOTES: A. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL UTILITY SIZES, LOCATION AND INSTALLATION WITH LOCAL UTILITY SUPPLIER. B. COORDINATE ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES WITH TENANT IMPROVEMENT PLANS. C. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONNECTIONS FOR TENANT EQUIPMENT WITH TENANT BUILD —OUT PLANS. O PLUMBING PLAN NOTES- 1 ZURN Z-1321 NON FREEZE ANTI —SIPHON AUTOMATIC DRAINING WALL HYDRANT TO BE CONNECTED IN TENANT IN —FILL PLANS. COORDINATE LOCATIONS W/ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PRIOR TO ROUGH —IN. 2 ROUTE 1-1/2" GAS DOWN THRU ROOF AND CAP. COORDINATE LOCATION(S) WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ROUGH —IN. PAINT ALL GAS PIPING TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3 COORDINATE DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ROUGH —IN. 11u o — II 0 1 MTRS 1 11 Li ———— ——-1 I "I CAP 2" DOMESTIC 3/4 11 WATER FOR TENANT. �II'DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ENTRANCE 11i;W/MAIN 1.5" METER & 2" RPBP#1 h 1013) INSTALL IWATER hUTIL1TYCOMPANY11I 11 =�u 11jIRRIGATION METER & RPBP#2 — ill Jill y DABOVE DOMESTIC WATER 111IBACKFLOW PREVENTER — CONFIRM !" I hPIPING CONFIGURATION W/UTILITY C6!I 11fj I II �I II I1 II II 1 h III II I 11 II II �' II I 11 II II �' II I 11 1j 1j 11 I 1Lh 11 I' j1 111' III II �' II II II �' II II II �' II II II II j1 IL — — 11 II II j1 II II II j1 II t 11 II 11 11 � 11 II j1 II � 11 II I� II � '1 II j1 h II II _ s II !I 11 II 4"VTR 3/4" li II O 11 II `— - II Ii—^ — J p i1 4 i1 BEGIN 4" GREASE WASTE LINE p h 36"BFF I, a 411 II 11 II tl II 11 II II II II � II II � II II � II II � h II 11 I=——- -— J1—'I= _— _� — — — 2 = _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —�I h�l ICI 11j1 111 11j1 yi1 u�l !I Nil II 'ICI 'ICI HMI 'Ip h�1 ljl j� Ijl hjl h�l 'I !I AEIIL JI 2" DOMESTIC WATER BRANCH EST.DEMAND = 56GPM AT MIN.60 PSI MIN., SEE SITE UTILITY PLANS FOR CONTINUATION TO MAIN. — 2" DOMESTIC WATER UP W/SHUT OFF VALVE; PROVIDE PRV IF GREATER THAN 70 PSI ARCHITECTURE 2948 SIDCO DRIVE ELECTRICAL PANELS — MAINTAIN PLANNING NASHVILLE, TN 37204 CLEARANCES REQUIRED BY NEC ENGINEERING (p)615.244.8170 (f) 615.244.8141 GRAPHICS www.mjmarch.com I hearby certify that this lan,s cification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supe an th t I am a duly Licensed Profess na i er d e state of Minnesota. Signature Typed or Printed Name:MITCHELL D. SIMPSON Date "24 Reg. No. 42082 J W N II ENTECH ENGINEERING INC. 5301 VIRGINIA WAY SUITE 140 BRENTWOOD, TN 37027 v. 615.373.2640 f. 615.373.4837 email@entechtn.com entechm.com COMPTON ASSOCIATES 3805 EDWARDS RD SUITE 390 CINCINNATI, OH 45209 PANERA SHELL MONTICELLO, MN N Z Q J N z 0 U W Z 3 0 z 0 Q V 0 J PERMIT SET W 4. 0 08.24 a 24114 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 3 "VTR I I This drawing and the design shown is the property of the architect. The reproduction, copying or use of this drawing without their written consent is prohibited and any infringement�� L. -1 1 r--1 will be subject to legal action. PLUMBING FLOOR PLANS N Z 0 U) W u u PLUMBING PLUMBING ROOF PLAN FLOOR PLAN 2ol SCALE: 1/4"=1'—O" SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" H W W 2 N -- I it ❑ „ ii _ _ _ _ \VVV\��, � _ — � _ L _ i I , I L II I n n 11 J D H //�� L _ , , ► , II II II N IIL—J II EXISTINGBU/LD L EX/ L _ _ /NG I S)j/�//1 lV7 \l gUIZ --_ I-1 — _ --_ --- 11Lu II Zsn u 8' TRAIL _ __ _ „ IL IN G l u // RAILROAD CROSSING -- BY OTHERS) --- d___ _ w __________ __=__--------=----- 120' DIA. \ MODULAR BLOCK v' _ j f '�--- ------------- -_ BITU� ° I _ _ -- --- ---- - -- _ _ TRUCK RETAINING WALL s q N -'�'� --- -r - - PAVEMENT AT TURNING / _ �" A - —- < L -� - - - - --IFRONT DRIVE s `� { - - - - -- --- - — - - ----- - -- S RVICE AREAS + _ - _.�------------------��]YP.)€��� ��_ / fr SIDEWALK DISPLAY I 1 R� - _ AREA - CONCRETE _ � - _ - _ _ _ _ lo' SCORING PATTERN A r� I-< _ _ _ - - r _ \ ♦ WILL CALL I ��K s�J----- - \ _ 1 (TYP.) N _ M v ' In - �1-'' it / '7 \ -+ J. W) LOT 2 / f g EN ED ��J/ /~ y.� ` ` ; I� GARDEN ENTER SIDEWALK �`�'�MEDLcp BUILDING S OT PLANTERS TYP. MATERIALS 11 11 11 , 11 - 102, 500 SF STORAGE / I� HOME IMPROVEMENT 'I � i 4'o I WALL PACK ��ao%t%c` ;'�� L _ WOOD SCREEN i u 28,00o SF FRONT SIDEWALK AR ' SURMOUNTABLE ' / - - - FENCE, 8 HIGH, li EMERGENCY LIGHTS, SEE docir ♦♦ _ - - J 2' FROM CURB - CONCRETE WITH EXIT <, RETAIL , I I I TRAFFIC ISLAND LIGHTING PLAN TRUCK DIA. CORRIDOR N 20000 $F I SURER ]AR (TYP.) \ TURNING I RETAIL SCORING PATTERN B, OCIC Z "' AT LOADING // 30 FLUSH WITH I I I DOCK AREA / 55 78' 153.75' GET BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT L� 1 CANOPY PIC P RETAIL � � � ' I TOOL 900T'41L 20000 SF 6000 SF N i , / % 444.1 T AREA - CO CRETE RENTAL 0 SF %%� 550 ScSF r I WITH STRIP[ G FRONT CONRETE -4 ' ' AREA � - y 11 SIDEWALK AND F5 o ' I I y, II II I I �l s ' PLANTERS _ 1 I y' I' II II / L — `♦ ♦\ o °° .. . P O.: 90CD 140' 49 ' �'�K — i yI ,I 1 °for e \ \\ r•j 50' 26.51 f i " M A o ' 'I FRONT CONRETE /� I 1 � o SIDEWALK AND i RELOCAT PLANTERS (TYP.) 30' 27 ' BITUMINOUS I " 4 g f I 2s' 4" ROLLED CONCRETE s3' 66' J IJ. II ul II \\ QG I u 7 a •-. — I TRAIL s72.s7' BUILDING AND FRONTER AT 5 1 I � o � (BY OTHERS) I 1 �, 1' ,1 1111 F 11 ' �1� G� I u o U „ ' 1 1 1 1 3 � °�� . '� C � ` II CA PAR CO „ ` (TYP 2s' s 24 VE I UTILITY, AND ANDTRAIL ♦> `> // �\_ N PA U 25 12 ET 30'; 63'o EASEMENT, VERIFY y 40 , I Q Rg TrE !-� ENVIRONMENTAL 63' "' SOIL PROBE AR % 68 LE 110 00 AV AT / �i .I i' /^ `♦ \ ` ` \ \ \ `yy � 2 \y SA 0 PTMH I_ — �33 •) 0' T O 4 VE MONUMENT SIGN - T HT." 0'` ' N 32 5 /7 ♦♦ �� `� `, ��I -vim � ,. <21 g ) ' ♦ UTILITY TRAILER � ♦ ` \ `�a 1 — �. DISPLAY AREA — { � 2 - _ ------ ----- 74 4' +HIV m i ARK N „ ♦♦ / ``� t:�f --- ------ROW--- ----- - SF 1 PT) 27 Y R J H T 5000 IG \\\ ♦ N DEDICATION w _ u- .I �•_ __- - ------ - -rno FUT aQ L�3 ! T_ a NOU IGH LAN ---------- , ---- --- ¢ _ "r RE n I'� RE f 1 I 8 ARD ^ ENT (TYP EVEL Q TAIL 6 1 ; (BY S) N NGROW „ 19 i-'' ♦ , s' S , /- " " - -` - z � N 11500 SF ' I 1 ' S a-DEDICATIOf 00 � , `.. P- ONUMENT`< 25' ls' - ♦ v y- ,-.y 8 TRAIL(1 OFF Q 1 z I 1 1 1 s 6' BOULEVARD i SIGN 12,D 4 - ' SIGN 6' HT. -'� TYPE B !� °� 63' sy' I I �, %y AT TURN LANE Q :\ ' ; �. w a I RO PLAZA AND ' CONCRETE --' ,vv vv ♦ V BY OTHERS _ a � � ' \ "�--MONUMENT C; -' I BENCHES a �,-_;';: ' r SIGN - 12' HT.,. IJRE D V �''�,. I ----- - _ --- - TYPE B /,-'- i'f 204 PARKING SPACES E ' _� _--------_----------" ____- _ _ "3_- _ Io _�--'------------------------------- _------------- = - - �.__- EXISTING ♦ ♦ /--' ; , f = .-' - MONUMENT-- ----------------------- ---------------- _----------_-_-___'== - N ' \ 03< << __-------- - --- -f' PEDESTRIAN-- ♦♦ 'JJ SIGN - 6' HT. �' �'� = __---------- •�41 <-- -- --- ---- -------------------- - -------------- _ _ ------ _ _ 8' TRAIL BRIDGE AND ♦ 'i, TYPED / -� ---- ---------- -r' L ` ------------- --- t,_,_,_, �' 1�------------------ - — - - - - -_- \ EST ------ --------- - """`------------ BACK OF CURB --- -- _-- --- - REST R --- a- _ RELOCATED TRAIL --- --- --- =3 T _� MONUM NT «<,_,_„ ---<1 <«<,_------------ - __---------- '� 600 SF 5600 SF �RF - - ------ --- 2'<; Tu= ' 11----------------- oursiDE 0 BOULEVARD-------(BY-OTHERS----- \ - ------1-- "o ' - / 5 80, S -� - -- ---------- - -- SIGN 1------------------- �— ��rvcE o.¢ Er (BY OTHERS)_ ---- ------ --- �- \` _.�' ,rf rfI`cV '��� RECONFIGURED I I �Sp --- -- ----- ------TYPE_B -----� = --_-- - _ — BOUNDARY ----------______________________________--____-------------------------------- --- 'ti STORM POND ---------------------- -- ' — � � 8' TRAIL(1' OFF PL) \ \\ 0 6' BOULEVARD /.01 _ _ _ _ _ _ - — - 8' TRAIL AT TURN LANE-------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------ ♦ ♦ \ o _ \ ■ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - PYLON 10' BOULEVARD (---)-----------------------------------------_----------------- - BY OTHERS ' __ - - ---- / — - SIGN - 50' HT. _ ------ ---- _ _ - _ _ - - (BY OTHERS) -------- --- / ■ ■ ■ ■ - - _-_______ _______��___------------------------------ --_ \C __ _____________ ■ — - - TYPE A -------- __________ __ ___ \ Z ._ \ \ � a OVERALL SITE BLOCK 1, LOT 1 - SUPER TARGET SITE BLOCK 2, LOT 2 OUTLOT A OUTLOT C EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) PROPOSED ZONING: B-4 (BUSINESS) IN PROGRESS LOT AREA: 14.089 AC LOT AREA: 6.227 AC LOT AREA: 1.077 AC LOT AREA: 3.855 AC BUILDING SETBACK FOR B0' PER CODE 3.3.E BUILDING AREA: 174,550 SF BUILDING AREA: 54,000 SF BUILDING AREA: 5,000 SF BUILDING AREA: 19,200 SF PARKING PROVIDED: 827 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 309 PARKING PROVIDED: 28 PARKING PROVIDED: 205 AREA (ACCESSIBLE PARKING INCLUDED, (ACCESSIBLE PARKING INCLUDED) (ACCESSIBLE PARKING INCLUDED) (ACCESSIBLE PARKING INCLUDED) BLOCK 1, LOT 1 14.089 AC CART CORRALS NOT INCLUDED) PARKING RATIO (309/54): 5.72 SP/1000 SF PARKING RATIO (28/5): 5.6 SP/1000 SF PARKING RATIO (205/19.2): 10.7 SP/1000 SF BLOCK 2, LOT 1 10.404 AC PARKING RATIO (827/174.5): 4.74 SP/1000 SF PARKING AREA: 105,705 SF PARKING AREA: 13,382 SF PARKING AREA: 74,486 SF BLOCK 2, LOT 2 6.227 AC PARKING AREA: 248,803 SF PARKING LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: 3,805 SF PARKING LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: 482 SF PARKING LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: 2,681 SF BLOCK 2, LOT 3 1.265 AC PARKING LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: 8,957 SF (180 S.F. PER 5000 S.F) (180 S.F. PER 5000 S.F) (180 S.F. PER 5000 S.F) OUTLOT A 1.077 AC (180 S.F. PER 5000 S.F) PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: 7,688 SF PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: 574 SF PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: 5,368 SF OUTLOT B 3.830 AC PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: 9,692 SF OUTLOT C 3.855 AC OUTLOT D OUTLOT D 0.487 AC R.O.W. DEDICATION 6.419 AC LOT AREA: 0.487 AC TOTAL 47.653 AC R.O.W. DEDICATION BLOCK 2, LOT 1 - HOME DEPOT SITE BLOCK 2, LOT 3 OUTLOT B DEVELOPABLE LOTS (EXCLUDING OUTLOT D & R.o.W.) LOT AREA: 40.93 AC BUILDING AREA: 388,750 SF PARKING PROVIDED: 2,094 (ACCESSIBLE PARKING INCLUDED, CART CORRALS NOT INCLUDED) PARKING RATIO: 5.39 SPACES PARKING AREA: 715,864 SF PARKING LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: 25,878 SF (180 SF PER 5000 SF) PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: 42,670 SF LOT AREA: BUILDING AREA: (GARDEN CENTER): PARKING PROVIDED: (ACCESSIBLE PARKING INCLUDED, CART CORRALS NOT INCLUDED) PARKING RATIO (485/102.5): PARKING AREA: PARKING LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: (180 S.F. PER 5000 S.F) PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: 10.404 AC 102,500 SF (28,000 SF) 485 4.73 SP/1000 SF 180,363 SF 6,601 SF 8,222 SF LOT AREA: BUILDING AREA: PARKING PROVIDED: (ACCESSIBLE PARKING INCLUDED) PARKING RATIO (74/11.5): PARKING AREA: PARKING LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: (180 S.F. PER 5000 S.F) PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: 1.265 AC 11,500 SF 74 6.43 SP/1000 SF 27,778 SF 1,000 SF 4,451 SF LOT AREA: BUILDING AREA: PARKING PROVIDED: (ACCESSIBLE PARKING INCLUDED) PARKING RATIO (166/22): PARKING AREA: PARKING LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: (180 S.F. PER 5000 S.F) PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: IN b 0 100 200 300 SCALE IN FEET LOT AREA: 6.419 AC 3.830 AC GENERAL LEGEND 22,000 SF 166 7.55 SP/1000 SF DENOTES EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 65,347 SF DENOTED EXISTING CURB AND BUILDING 2,352 SF DENOTES PROPOSED PUBLIC CURB (BY OTHERS) 6,675 SF DENOTES PROPOSED PRIVATE BUILDING DENOTES PROPOSED PRIVATE CURB DENOTES FUTURE PRIVATE BUILDING DENOTES FUTURE PRIVATE CURB :co - o 3 � �c: 0 3 _co 3 L oc 0 z a� rr a� a� 0 U U) 0 co co a in V O Cl4 10 Lo r o CD 0 U Co c c ol O c Oo E C� co' z U N �O a U � O M M N Q V N N Uj U v o o v) It U o U) _ z O Q J w U z U) Q J C� z � J m U �i C) �?o 99 co C zs- ^ C 0 1 Oa �04 � N L i N >^ ,V g E W o 7 N � 0 • i U TN� n' 4) W SON Oc W cd Jio L)o co_ cso C4 o LL ►_ T �y 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET TF U F I T� � \ 1 O UNTy�,0907S BURLINGTON —�-- NORTHERN & SAN TA f oK � 1 BLOCK 2 GARDEN CENTER HOMEDEPOT 102LOT 2 zs,000 sF, 500 SF BLOCK 2 r200oo ETAIL LOT 1 RETAIL 1 200 0 SF 9000 SF BURL/NGTON—'--'_—__—__----_— _ NOR SgNTEF — _ --__ ERq/LROAD �290/NG �W 1 i a > 1 a wo = 1 m�� A SUPER TARGET 174,550 SF BLOCK 1 LOT C=� 7 .. ... . 1� RETAIL 6000 SF I OUTL .. PIP— __ ---- OVA NQD BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS it RYAN COMPANIES I US, INC. 50 South Tenth S-1, Sire 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 1 612-492-4000 .1 I 612-492-3000 f— W W W.RYANCOMPANIES.COM PROJECT NAME UNION CROSSINGS LOCATION MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET TITLE SIGNAGE EXHIBIT REVISIONS NAME #XXXX SHEET NUMBER 1 DRAWN BY CHECICED BY CAB SJB JOB NUMBER DATE 209-109 612105 L J I I Super TARGET �- TENANT �I TENANT ■ SIGN 1 TENANT TENANT SIGN 6 8" TENANT SIGNS 2, 3, 4 & 5 -1 TENANT T TANT :4T AKI TENANT SIGN 7 ..ores UNION CROSSINGS MON"CE . MI SO A SIGNAGE E Mrr 2� J J CITY OF Mont e o April 30, 2024 Re: Panera City Project # 2024-18 OFFICE:763-295-2711 FAX:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 I Monticello, MN 55362 The Engineering Department has reviewed the Civil Plans for the Panera site dated 4-8-2024 as prepared by Westwood and offers the following comments: General Comments 1. In the NW corner of the site the existing access drive is missing curb and will need to be installed with the project. 2. The sanitary service pipe shall be SDR26. 3. Tracer wire shall follow Appendix D of the Monticello specifications (https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/881/Appendix-D-Tracer- Wire) 4. Plans shall include the required notes from the design manual #10 required notes on page 3(https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/121/Design-Manual--- Plan-Requirements-and-Design-Guidelines-PDF) 5. The fire and building departments will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. 6. Consider making sidewalk connection to 7th street sidewalk and/or to sidewalk on north side of internal drive. 7. Consider extending drive-thru curb to prevent cars from cutting into drive-thru lane. 8. If 1 acre or more is proposed to be disturbed a SWPPP will need to be created and implemented and NPDES construction stormwater permit will be required. 9. Streets, parking lots, and utilities shall be designed in accordance with the applicable City Subdivision Ordinances and the City's General Specifications and Standard Details Plates for Street and Utility Construction. The City is not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please contact the Engineering Department with any questions. Sincerely, ,, -, ii., :t - Ryan Melhouse Assistant City Engineer www.ci.monticello.mn.us Planning Commission Agenda: 05/07/24 4A. Consideration of authorizing a letter to Governor Walz Supporting the Retention of Local Land Use Authority and Authorizing Submission. Prepared by: Meeting Date: Community Development Director 5/07/24 Reviewed by: Community & Economic Development Coordinator ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize submission of a letter to Governor Walz supporting the retention of local land use authority. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND During the 2024 state legislative session, a number of bills that would preempt local zoning and subdivision authority have been introduced in both the House and Senate. Recent versions of House and Senate bills are attached for reference. The language in these bills will significantly impact local land use authority, ignore the efforts local governments have made to address the housing needs unique to their community, and have negative consequences for taxpayers. Variations of these bills continue to stop and start in both the House and Senate. There is always the possibility that language from these bills, if not adopted separately, will make its way into an omnibus bill. The bills include language that universally mandates use type, density, and lot requirements for all Minnesota communities, eliminating the ability of each unique Minnesota community to provide the housing most needed in their community. One proposes to eliminate completely the parking minimums for all residential, commercial and industrial districts, removing the city's ability to efficiently manage demand created by individual use types. In addition to the one -size -fits -all approach to zoning and subdivision represented in these bills, they critically remove the ability for residents and property owners to have their voices heard in the process for certain multi -family land use applications, a foundational aspect of Minnesota's land use process. Further, they include language to restrict a thorough review of building permit applications. A complete building permit review is critical to ensuring the health and safety of all who reside in and visit buildings in our community. Finally, the bills proposed significantly impact the ability to adequately plan for vital public infrastructure in our communities and neighborhoods. In fact, these bills would require an Planning Commission Agenda: 05/07/24 update to the comprehensive utility studies Monticello has already completed to responsibly plan for infrastructure. This will directly impact current and future taxpayers. Monticello's zoning and subdivision requirements have been adopted to align with the Monticello 2040 Plan. The 2040 Plan is a long-range document developed by and for the community, addressing our individual community needs and identifying policies to grow and maintain neighborhoods reflective of Monticello's goals. Consistent with the vision established by the community itself through rigorous public engagement, the City of Monticello is committed to promoting efficient land use planning and development at all levels of the housing continuum. The City has and will continue to evaluate ordinances and development project proposals based on the Monticello 2040 plan and supporting documents, such as the 2023 Housing Study. The letter included for authorization affirms the Planning Commission's support for preserving Monticello's ability to work with the development community to ensure the health, welfare, and safety of our residents. I. Budget Impact: None directly related to the resolution and letter. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff have been following this session's action on zoning and subdivision preemption closely. An estimated 10 hours of staff time has been spent evaluating action. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: As noted above, the action requested is in direct support of Monticello's 2040 Plan goals for housing and land use in the community. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommend the adoption of the supporting letter to Governor Walz. Consistent with the vision established by the community itself through rigorous public engagement, the City of Monticello is committed to promoting development at all levels of the housing continuum and efficient land use planning. Broad preemption of local zoning and subdivision authority would have significant impacts on Monticello's ability to achieve its adopted Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan goals and limit our ability to grow and maintain neighborhoods reflective of comprehensive plan goals. SUPPORTING DATA A. Letter to Governor Walz, Draft B. Current House (HF 4010) and Senate Files (SF 1370 and 3572) Information C. League of MN Cities Update, April 22, 2024 May 7, 2024 Governor Tim Walz 130 State Capitol 75 Rev Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Governor Walz, The City of Monticello Planning Commission respectfully shares with you our concerns regarding recent legislative efforts to preempt city zoning and subdivision authority. The language in the draft legislation proposed will significantly impact local land use authority, ignore the efforts local governments have made to address the housing and land use needs unique to their community, and have negative consequences for taxpayers. Local zoning and subdivision ordinances are enacted to protect the health and safety of our residents, as well as their property and the livability of the community. While we appreciate the efforts being made to address the housing crisis, we also believe the proposed legislation being considered does not align with the unique needs and challenges faced by local communities. Monticello's position is that individual communities are in the best position to address local zoning and subdivision requirements which respond to local needs. Universally mandated use type, density and lot requirements would eliminate the ability of individual Minnesota communities to provide the housing most needed in their community. Similarly, the complete removal of any parking minimums eliminates the ability to efficiently manage parking demands created by individual use types and would significantly impact adjacent properties. Monticello is committed to ensuring every individual and family can find the home that meets their needs. We have taken seriously our role in community planning. Over the last five years, Monticello has worked to address housing issues in our community: • Completing a detailed housing analysis which provided information on the housing most needed in our community, including affordable and senior housing. • Implementing a variety of tools to help address housing demand in Monticello, including affordable and missing middle housing. These include allowing development of by -right small lot single-family zoning and continued support for two-family and medium density zoning. • Adopting the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which recognizes the need for more medium to high -density housing and mixed density neighborhoods, guiding more land for these uses within the community. • Approving construction of nearly 500 multi -family units in Monticello, including a mix of affordable and market -rate options. Multi -family construction outpaced single-family construction at a ratio of 3 to 1 in Monticello from 2019-2023. In addition to the one -size -fits all approach to zoning and subdivision represented in these bills, some even propose to remove the ability for residents and property owners to have their voices heard in the process, a foundational aspect of Minnesota's land use process. Further, they include language to restrict a thorough review of building permit applications. A complete building permit review is critical to ensuring the health and safety of all who reside in and visit buildings in our community. Finally, the bills proposed significantly impact the ability to adequately plan for vital public infrastructure in our communities and neighborhoods, including streets, pathways and parks. In fact, these bills would negate the work Monticello has already completed to responsibly plan for infrastructure. This will directly impact current and future taxpayers. Consistent with the vision established by the community itself through rigorous public engagement, the City of Monticello is committed to promoting development at all levels of the housing continuum. Broad preemption of local zoning and subdivision authority under the guise of housing affordability is not the answer to the housing challenges we face. We ask for your support in preserving Monticello's ability to work with the housing and development community to ensure the health, welfare, and safety of our residents. We appreciate the consideration of these comments. Sincerely, Paul Konsor, on behalf of the Monticello Planning Commission HF4010 FIRST ENGROSSMENT REVISOR KRB H4010-1 This Document can be made available in alternative formats upon request State of Minnesota HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-THIRD SESSION H. F. No. 4010 02/19/2024 Authored by Kozlowski, Howard, Agbaje, Hollins, Wolgamott and others The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Housing Finance and Policy 04/02/2024 Adoption of Report: Amended and re -referred to the Committee on State and Local Government Finance and Policy 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to local government; establishing requirements for multifamily residential 1.3 developments in cities; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, 1.4 chapter 462. 1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.6 Section 1. [462.35711 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. 1.7 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have 1.8 the meanings given. 1.9 (b) "Affordable housing development" means a multifamily residential development in 1.10 which: 1.11 (1) at least 20 percent of the residential units are for households whose incomes do not 1.12 exceed 50 percent of the greater of the statewide or area median income; or 1.13 (2) at least 40 percent of the residential units are for households whose incomes do not 1.14 exceed 60 percent of the greater of the statewide or area median income. 1.15 1.16 The deed or declaration for an affordable residential unit must also contain a restrictive covenant requiring the property to remain affordable housing for at least 30 years. 1,17 (c) "City" means a home rule charter or statutory city. L 1 g (d) "Commercial use" means the use of land or buildings, in whole or in part, for the L19 sale, lease, rental, or trade of products, goods, and services. 1.20 (e) "Cottage housing" means residential dwelling units on a lot with a common open 121 space that either: Section 1. 1 HF4010 FIRST ENGROSSMENT REVISOR KRB H4010-1 2.1 (1) is owned in common. or 2.2 (2) has units owned as condominium units with property owned in common and a 2.3 minimum of 20 percent of the lot size as open space. 2.4 (f) "Courtyard apartment" means a building with up to four attached residential dwelling 2.5 units arranged on two or three sides of a yard or garden. 2.6 (g) "Duplex" means a two-family home, classified as an IRC-2 in the State Building 2.7 Code and not meeting the definition of townhouse. 2.8 (h) "Environmental justice area" has the meaning given in section 116.065, subdivision 2.9 2.10 (i) "Fiveplex" means a building containing five residential dwelling units intended for 2.11 nontransient occupancy and not meetinp- the definition of townhouse. 2.12 0) "Fourplex" means a building containing four residential dwelling units intended for 2.13 nontransient occupancy and not meeting the definition of townhouse. 2.14 (k) "Metropolitan area" has the meaning given in section 473.121, subdivision 2. 2.15 (1) "Multifamily residential development" means a single residential building with at 2.16 least 13 units or a mixed -use building with commercial use on the ground floor and at least 2.17 half of the usable square footage is for residential use. Multifamily residential development 2.18 does not include the following housing types: 2.19 (1) duplexes; 2.20 (2) triplexes; 2.21 (3) fourplexes; 2.22 (4) fiveplexes; 2.23 (5) sixplexes; 2.24 (6) townhouses; 2.25 (7) stacked flats; 2.26 (8) courtyard apartments; 2.27 (9) cottage housing; and 2.29 (10) single-family detached homes. 2.29 (in) "Residential unit" means a residential dwelling for the use of a simile owner or 2.30 tenant. Section 1. 2 HF4010 FIRST ENGROSSMENT REVISOR KRB H4010-1 3.1 (n) "Single-family detached home" means any building that contains one residential 3.2 dwelling unit used, intended, or designed to be built, used, rented, leased, let, or hired out 3.3 to be occupied, or occupied for living purposes that is not attached to another structure. 3.4 (o) "Sixplex" means a building containing six residential dwelling units intended for 15 nontransient occupancy and not meeting the definition of townhouse. 3.6 (o) "Stacked flat" means a nontransient residential buildinv- of no more than three stories 3.7 on a lot zoned for residential development in which each floor is a residential dwelling unit. 3.8 (q) "Structure" means anything constructed or installed for residential or commercial 3.9 use that requires a location on a parcel of land. Structure does not include nonconformities. 3.10 (r) "Townhouse" means a single-family residential dwelling unit constructed in a group 3.11 of three or more attached units in which each unit extends from the foundation to the roof 3.12 and with open space on at least two sides. Each single-family residential dwelling unit shall 3.13 be considered to be a separate building. Separate building service utilities shall be provided 3.14 to each single-familv residential dwellina unit when reauired by the Minnesota State Building 3.15 Code. 3.16 (s) "Triplex" means a building containing three residential dwelling units intended for 3.17 nontransient occupancy and not meeting the definition of townhouse. 3.18 Subd. 2. Multifamily residential developments. (a) Subject to compliance with all 3.19 municipal zoning standards, multifamily residential developments shall be a permitted use 3.20 in any zoning district that allows for a commercial use, except for: 3.21 (1) industrial zoning districts where a commercial use is not allowed; or 3.22 (2) industrial zoning districts that are located in environmental justice areas. 3.23 (b) A multifamily residential development may not be constructed on a lot zoned for a 3.24 single-family detached home unless otherwise authorized by law, rule, or ordinance. 3.25 (c) A city may require a conditional use permit for a multifamily residential development 3.26 only if the specific circumstances of the development raise concerns related to the public 3.27 health, safety, and general welfare. 3.28 Subd. 3. Applicable zoning standards. (a) A multifamily residential development must 3.29 comply with any standards, performance conditions, or requirements, including the adequacy 3.30 of existing public infrastructure, imposed by a city to promote the public health, safety, and 3.31 general welfare. Section 1. 3 HF4010 FIRST ENGROSSMENT REVISOR KRB H4010-1 4.1 (b) A city must not impose a height requirement on a multifamily residential development 4.2 that is less than the following: 4.3 (1) in a city of the first class, 75 feet; 4.4 (2) in a city of the second class, 45 feet; 4.5 (3) in a city of the third class in the metropolitan area, 45 feet; or 4.6 (4) in a city of the third class outside of the metropolitan area, 35 feet. 4.7 (c) A city must not impose a setback requirement on a multifamily residential 4.8 development that is greater than the smallest required minimum setback distance of any 4.9 other structure in the same zoning district of the parcel on which the development will be 4.10 built. 4.11 (d) A city may impose a height or setback requirement that is different from the 4.12 requirements in this subdivision if such requirements would result in a multifamily residential 4.13 development that would substantially vary in compatibility and scale with surrounding 4.14 properties. 4.15 (e) This subdivision does not apply to a city of the fourth class. 4.16 Subd. 4. Parking requirements limited. A city may not require more than one off-street 417 parking space per residential unit, except that additional disability parking spaces may be 4.18 required to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 4.19 Subd. 5. Affordable housing development; height and mass requirements. An 4.20 affordable housing development must be permitted to exceed one or more maximum 4.21 dimensional standards imposed by city official zoning controls as a zoning density bonus. 4.22 A zoning density bonus offered by a city for an affordable housing development may include 4.23 one or more of the following dimensional standards above the maximum base zoning 4.24 regulations: 4.25 (1) a building height increase of at least 35 feet; 4.26 (2) an increased floor area ratio; 4.27 (3) an increased number of units per acre; 4.28 (4) an increased total number of units; 4.29 (5) a higher percentage of lot coverage; or 4.30 (6) other dimensional standards that increase building size by at least 30 percent more 4.31 than what is allowed for market -rate multifamily residential developments. Section 1. 4 HF4010 FIRST ENGROSSMENT REVISOR KRB H4010-1 5.1 Subd. 6. Administrative review process. (a) Notwithstanding any law, rule, or ordinance 5.2 to the contrary, a city must establish an administrative review process subject to the 5.3 procedures in section 15.99 for a multifamily residential development meeting the 5.4 reauirements of this section. 5.5 (b) An application reviewed through an administrative review process or other process 5.6 may not be approved contingent on factors not related to the protection of the public health, 5.7 safety, and welfare; the completion of a study; or the development being a part of a planned 5.8 unit development if the multifamily residential development complies with this section. 5.9 Subd. 7. Exceptions. (a) Nothing in this section authorizes a multifamily residential 5.10 development that is prohibited by state or federal law or rule, or is prohibited under an 5.11 ordinance adopted pursuant to such a state or federal law or rule, that protects floodplains, 5.12 areas of critical or historic concern, wild and scenic rivers, shore land, or that otherwise 5.13 restrict residential units to protect and preserve the public health, the environment, or scenic 5.14 areas. 5.15 (b) A multifamily residential development may not be inconsistent with approved plans 5.16 under chapter 103B. 5.17 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2025. Section 1. 5 SF1370 REVISOR JSK S1370-1 1st Engrossment SENATE STATE OF MINNESOTA NINETY-THIRD SESSION S.F. NO. 1370 (SENATE AUTHORS: PORT, Mitchell and Fateh) DATE D-PG OFFICIAL STATUS 02/08/2023 733 Introduction and first reading Referred to Housing and Homelessness Prevention 03/22/2023 2199 Conan report: To pass 2199 Second reading 11498 Rule 47, returned to Housing and Homelessness Prevention 03/13/2024 12159a Comm report: To pass as amended and re -refer to State and Local Government and Veterans 12197 Author added Mitchell 04/15/2024 Author added Fateh A bill for an act 1.2 relating to housing; amending provisions relating to building permit processing 1.3 and fees; amending provisions relating to land use and planning; prohibiting 1.4 counties and municipalities from enacting ordinances prohibiting emergency shelter 1.5 facilities; establishing requirements for municipalities to allow multifamily 1.6 residential developments; defining middle housing; requiring permitting middle 1.7 housing types in residential areas; authorizing accessory dwelling units; limiting 1.8 off-street parking requirements for residential development; limiting aesthetic 1.9 mandates on residential project approvals; limiting requirements for homeowners 1.10 associations on residential project approvals; amending Minnesota Statutes 2022, 1.11 sections 15.99, subdivisions 1, 2; 326B.153, by adding a subdivision; 394.25, by 1.12 adding subdivisions; 462.357, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new 1.13 law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 462. 1.14 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.15 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 15.99, subdivision 1, is amended to read: 1.16 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section, the following ternis shall 1.17 have the meanings given. 1.19 (b) "Agency" means a department, agency, board, commission, or other group in the 1.19 executive branch of state government; a statutory or home rule charter city, county, town, 1.20 or school district; any metropolitan agency or regional entity; and any other political 1.21 subdivision of the state. 1 22 (c) "Request" means a written application for a building permit, or a written application 1.23 related to zoning, septic systems, watershed district review, soil and water conservation 1.24 district review, or the expansion of the metropolitan urban service area, for a permit, license, 1.25 or other governmental approval of an action. A request must be submitted in writing to the 1.26 agency on an application form provided by the agency, if one exists. The agency may reject Section 1 SF 1370 REVISOR JSK S 1370-1 1 st Engrossment 2.1 as incomplete a request not on a form of the agency if the request does not include 2.2 information required by the agency. A request not on a form of the agency must clearly 2.3 identify on the first page the specific permit, license, or other governmental approval being 2.4 sought. No request shall be deemed made if not in compliance with this paragraph. 2.5 (d) "Applicant" means a person submitting a request under this section. An applicant 2.6 may designate a person to act on the applicant's behalf regarding a request under this section 2.7 and any action taken by or notice given to the applicant's designee related to the request 2.8 shall be deemed taken by or given to the applicant. 2.9 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 15.99, subdivision 2, is amended to read: 2.10 Subd. 2. Deadline for response. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, section 2.11 462.358, subdivision 3b, or 473.175, or chapter 505, and notwithstanding any other law to 2.12 the contrary, an agency must approve or deny within 60 days a written request for a building 2.13 permit, or a written request relating to zoning, septic systems, watershed district review, 2.14 soil and water conservation district review, or expansion of the metropolitan urban service 2.15 area for a permit, license, or other governmental approval of an action. Failure of an agency 2.16 to deny a request within 60 days is approval of the request. If an agency denies the request, 2.17 it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request. 2.18 (b) When a vote on a resolution or properly made motion to approve a request fails for 2.19 any reason, the failure shall constitute a denial of the request provided that those voting 2.20 against the motion state on the record the reasons why they oppose the request. A denial of 2.21 a request because of a failure to approve a resolution or motion does not preclude an 2.22 immediate submission of a same or similar request. 2.23 (c) Except as provided in paragraph (b), if an agency, other than a multimember governing 2.24 body, denies the request, it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that 2.25 it denies the request. If a multimember governing body denies a request, it must state the 2.26 reasons for denial on the record and provide the applicant in writing a statement of the 2.27 reasons for the denial. If the written statement is not adopted at the same time as the denial, 2.28 it must be adopted at the next meeting following the denial of the request but before the 2.29 expiration of the time allowed for making a decision under this section. The written statement 2.30 must be consistent with the reasons stated in the record at the time of the denial. The written 2.31 statement must be provided to the applicant upon adoption. Sec. 2. 2 SF 1370 REVISOR JSK S 1370-1 1 st Engrossment 3.1 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 326B.153, is amended by adding a subdivision 3.2 to read: 3.3 Subd. 5. Valuation. The commissioner must establish a cost -per -square -foot valuation 3.4 of residential buildings for the purpose of setting building permit fees by municipalities. 3.5 Residential buildings include one- and two-family buildings, townhouse buildings, and 3.6 accessory buildings. 3.7 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 394.25, is amended by adding a subdivision to 3.s read: 3.9 Subd. 11. Emergency shelter facility. (a) "Emergency shelter facility" means a facility 3.10 that provides a safe, sanitary, accessible, and suitable emergency shelter for individuals and 3.1 1 families experiencing homelessness, regardless of whether the facility provides emergency 3.12 shelter during the day, overnight, or both. The emergency shelter facility must conform 3.13 with the State Buildina Code under chanter 326B and the State Fire Code under chapter 3.14 299F. 3.15 (b) A county shall not enact, amend, or enforce a zoning ordinance that prohibits 3.16 emergency shelter facilities. A county may prohibit an emergency shelter facility in areas 3.17 zoned for residential, agricultural, or heavy industrial uses, or as required by law to conform 3.18 with the State Building Code, State Fire Code, or other state requirements. 3.19 Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 394.25, is amended by adding a subdivision to 320 read: 3.21 Subd. 12. Homeowners associations. (a) A county must not condition approval of a 3.22 residential building permit, residential subdivision development, or residential planned unit 3.23 development on the creation of a homeowners association or on the inclusion of any terms 3.24 in a homeowners association bylaws, articles of incorporation, or any other governing 3.25 document that is not required under state law. 3.26 (b) A county must not require that a residential property be part of a homeowners 3.27 association or provide an incentive for such membership. The county must also not require 3.28 or incentivize a homeowners association to adopt terms or conditions not required under 3.29 state law. Sec. 5. 3 SF 1370 REVISOR JSK S 1370-1 1 st Engrossment 4.1 Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 462.357, is amended by adding a subdivision to 4.2 read: 4.3 Subd. 1j. Emergency shelter facility. (a) "Emergency shelter facility" means a facility 4.4 that provides a safe, sanitary, accessible, and suitable emergency shelter for individuals and 4.5 families experiencing homelessness, regardless of whether the facility provides emergency 4.6 shelter during the day, overnight, or both. The emergency shelter facility must confonn 4.7 with the State Building Code under chanter 326B and the State Fire Code under chanter 4.s 299F. 4.9 (b) A municipality shall not enact, amend, or enforce a zoning ordinance that prohibits 4.10 emergency shelter facilities. A municipality may prohibit an emergency shelter facility in 4.11 areas zoned for residential, or agricultural, or heavy industrial uses, or as required by law 4.12 to conform with the State Building Code, State Fire Code, or other state requirements. 4.13 Sec. 7. 1462.35711 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. 4.14 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following tenas have 4.15 the meanings given. 4.16 (b) "Affordable housing development" means a multifamily residential development in 4.17 which: 4.18 (1) at least 20 percent of the residential units are for households whose incomes do not 4.19 exceed 50 percent of the area median income; or 4.20 (2) at least 40 percent of the residential units are for households whose incomes do not 4.21 exceed 60 percent of the area median income. 4.22 4.23 The deed or declaration for an affordable residential unit must also contain a restrictive covenant requiring the property to remain affordable housing for at least 30 years. 4.24 (c) "Municipality" means a home rule charter city, statutory city, or town. 4.25 (d) "Multifamily residential development" means a single residential building with more 4.26 than eight dwelling units or a mixed -use building with commercial use on the ground floor 4.27 and at least half of the usable square footage is for residential uses. Multifamily residential 4.28 development is not middle housing as defined in section 462.3575, subdivision 1. 4.29 (e) "Residential unit" means a residential dwelling for the use of a single owner or tenant. 4.30 Subd. 2. Multifamily residential developments. (a) Multifamily residential 4.31 developments are a permitted use in any mixed -use, multifamily, or commercial zoning 4.32 district, subject to compliance with all municipal standards. Sec. 7. 4 SF 1370 REVISOR JSK S 1370-1 1 st Engrossment 5.1 (b) A multifamily residential development may be mixed use so long as at least 50 5.2 percent of the usable square footage of the development is dedicated to residential use. 5.3 Subd. 3. Applicable zoning standards. (a) A municipality must not impose a height 5.4 requirement on a multifamily residential development that is less than the tallest commercial 5.5 or residential building within a one -quarter mile radius of the parcel on which the 5.6 development will be built or the maximum height permitted under the municipality's official 5.7 controls, whichever is higher. 5.8 (b) A municipality must not impose a setback requirement on a multifamily residential 5.9 development that is more than the smallest minimum setback distance required of a new 5.10 building within a one -quarter mile radius of the parcel on which the development will be 5.11 built. 5.12 Subd. 4. Parking requirements limited. A municipality may not require more than one 5 13 off-street parking space per residential unit. 5.14 Subd. 5. Affordable housing development; height requirements. (a) Subject to section 5.15 462.358, subdivision 2a, an affordable housing development must be permitted to exceed 5 16 both a maximum height requirement and a maximum floor area ratio limitation imposed by 5.17 municipality official controls as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c). The authority in 5,19 paragraphs (b) and (c) that produces the tallest development with the most number of 5 19 affordable housing units on the parcel shall be applied to the affordable housing development. 5.20 (b) An affordable housing development may either: 5.21 (1) exceed the height requirement for the zoning district where the affordable housing 5.22 development will be located by 35 feet in height; or 5.23 (2) match the maximum allowed height in any zoning district within one mile of the 5.24 affordable housing development. 5.25 (c) In addition to all previous allowances, an affordable housing development must be 5.26 permitted to do one of the following, whichever results in the largest development: 5.27 (1) exceed the maximum floor area ratio or dwelling unit count permitted by municipality 5.28 standards or the municipality's comprehensive plan by 30 percent, whichever allows for 5.29 greater density; 5.30 (2) exceed the lot coverage ratio by 30 percent; 5.31 (3) exceed the floor area ratio by 30 percent; or 5.32 (4) exceed the maximum impervious lot coverage area by 30 percent. Sec. 7. 5 SF1370 REVISOR JSK S1370-1 1st Engrossment 6.1 (d) A municipality that does not approve a project under section 462.358, subdivision 6.2 2a, must provide the applicant with written justification and reasons for the disapproval 6.3 within seven days of the disapproval. Where insufficient infrastructure is the reason for 6.4 disapproval, a municipality must include credentialed evidence in the written justification. 6.5 Subd. 6. State Building Code; State Fire Code. This section is subject to the 6.6 requirements under the State Building Code under chapter 326B and the State Fire Code 6.7 under chapter 299F. 6.8 Sec. 8. 1462.35751 MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES AND ASSOCIATED 6.9 REQUIREMENTS. 6.10 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have 6.11 the meanings given. 6.12 (b) "Accessory dwelling unit" means a smaller, independent residential dwelling unit 6.13 located on the same lot as a dwelling. An accessory dwelling unit may be attached or detached 6.14 from the existing dwelling. Accessory dwelling unit does not include sacred communities 6.15 and micro -unit dwellings under section 327.30 and temDorary family health care dwellings 6.16 under section 462.3593. 6.17 (c) "Affordable housing" means a residential dwelling unit affordable to households at 6.18 or below 1 l 5 percent of the area median household income, for an owner -occupied unit, or 6.19 at or below 60 percent of the area median household income, for a unit that is leased. The 6.20 deed or declaration for the unit must also contain a restrictive covenant requiring the property 6.21 to remain affordable housing for at least ten years if the unit is owner -occupied, or at least 6.22 30 vears if the unit is leased. 6.23 (d) "All -electric and efficient home" means a residential dwelling unit that utilizes 6.24 electricity or a combination of electricity and thermal energy as its sole source of energy 6.25 for heating, hot water heating, cooling, and appliances and meets the most current minimum 6.26 efficiency standards of a zero energy ready home under the Zero Energy Ready Home 6.27 Program administered by United States Department of Energy. 6.28 (e) "Cottage housing" means residential dwelling units on a lot with a common open 6.29 space that either: 6.30 (1) is owned in common; or 6.31 (2) has units owned as condominium units with property owned in common and a 6.32 minimum of 20 percent of the lot size as open space. Sec. 8. 6 SF1370 REVISOR JSK S1370-1 1st Engrossment 7.1 (f) "Courtyard apartment" means a building with up to four attached residential dwelling 7.2 units arranged on two or three sides of a yard or garden. 7.3 (g) "Duplex" means a two-family home, classified as an IRC-2 in the State Building 7.4 Code and not meeting the definition of townhouse. 7.5 (h) "Fiveplex" means a building containing five residential dwelling units intended for 7.6 nontransient occupancy and not meeting the definition of townhouse. 7.7 (i) "Fourplex" means a building containing four residential dwelling units intended for 7.8 nontransient occupancy and not meeting the definition of townhouse. 7.9 (j) "Lot" means any contiguous parcel of land in the possession of, owned by, or recorded 7.10 as the property of the same claimant or person. 7.11 (k) "Major transit stop" means a stop or station for a guideway or busway, as the terms 7.12 are defined in section 473.4485, subdivision 1. 7.13 (1) "Middle housing" means buildings that are single-family detached homes and 7.14 residential properties that are compatible in scale, form, and character with single-family 7.15 detached homes. Middle housing includes all of the following housing types: 7 16 (1) duplexes; 7.17 (2) triplexes; 7.18 (3) fourplexes; 7.19 (4) fiveplexes; 7.20 (5) sixplexes; 7.21 (6) townhouses; 7.22 (7) stacked flats; 7.23 (8) courtyard apartments; 7.24 (9) cottage housing; 7.25 (10) single-family detached homes; and 7.26 (11) twin homes. 7.27 (m) "Municipality" means a home rule charter city, statutory city, or town. 7.28 (n) "Residential dwelling unit" or "unit" means a residential dwelling unit for the use of 7.29 a single owner or tenant and applies to any type of residential structure unless otherwise 7.30 specified. Sec. 8. 7 SF1370 REVISOR JSK S1370-1 1st Engrossment 8.1 (o) "Single-family detached home" means any building that contains one residential 8.2 dwelling unit used, intended, or designed to be built, used, rented, leased, let, or hired out 8.3 to be occupied, or occupied for living purposes that is not attached to another structure. 8.4 (p) "Sixplex" means a building containing six residential dwelling units intended for 8.5 nontransient occupancy and not meeting the definition of townhouse. 8.6 (q) "Stacked flat" means a nontransient residential building of no more than three stories 8.7 on a lot zoned for residential development in which each floor is a residential dwelling unit. 8.8 (r) "Townhouse" means a single-family residential dwelling unit constructed in a group 8.9 of three or more attached units in which each unit extends from the foundation to the roof 8.10 and with open space on at least two sides. Each single-family residential dwelling unit shall 8.11 be considered a separate building. Separate building service utilities shall be provided to 8.12 each single-family residential dwelling unit when required by the State Building Code. 8,13 (s) "Triplex" means a building containing three residential dwelling units intended for 8.14 nontransient occupancy and not meeting the definition of townhouse. 8.15 Subd. 2. Middle housing types permitted. A municipality must authorize at least six 8.16 types of middle housing other than single-family detached homes to be built on residential 8.17 lots in single-familv zones in the municipality to achieve the densitv reauirements in this 8.18 section. 8.19 Subd. 3. Cities of the first class; required residential densities. (a) Subject to section 8.20 462.358, subdivision 2a, a city of the first class must permit the development of at least four 8.21 residential dwelling units on any residential lot that is more than one-half mile from a major 8.22 transit stop, unless one of the followinp- criteria are met: 8.23 (1) if all of the units are all -electric and efficient homes, the city must permit the 8.24 development of at least six residential dwelling units on the lot; 8.25 (2) if at least two of the units are affordable housing, the city must permit the development 8.26 of at least six residential dwelling units on the lot; or 8.27 (3) if all of the units are all -electric and efficient homes and at least two of the units are 8.28 also affordable housing, the city must permit the development of at least eight residential 8.29 dwelling units on the lot. 8.30 (b) Subject to section 472.358, subdivision 2a, a city of the first class must permit the 8.31 development of at least six residential dwelling units on any residential lot that is one-half 8.32 mile or less from a major transit stop, unless one of the following criteria are met: Sec. 8. 8 SF1370 REVISOR JSK S1370-1 1st Engrossment 9.1 (1) if all of the units are all -electric and efficient homes, the city must permit the 9.2 development of at least eight residential dwelling units on the lot; 9.3 (2) if at least two of the units are affordable housing, the city must permit the development 9.4 of at least eip-ht residential dwellinp- units on the lot, or 9.5 (3) if all of the units are all -electric and efficient homes and at least two of the units are 9.6 also affordable housing, the city must permit the development of at least ten residential 9.7 dwelline units on the lot. 9.8 (c) The requirements of this subdivision apply regardless of the types of middle housing 9.9 authorized by the city under subdivision 2. 9.10 (d) A municipality that does not approve a project under section 462.358, subdivision 9.11 2a, must provide the applicant with written _justification and reasons for the disapproval 9.12 within seven days of the disapproval. Where insufficient infrastructure is the reason for 9.13 disapproval, a municipality must include credentialed evidence in the written justification. 9.14 Subd. 4. Other cities and towns; required residential densities. (a) Subject to section 9.15 462.358, subdivision 2a, a city of the second, third, or fourth class or town must permit the 9.16 development of at least two residential dwelling units on any residential lot that is more 9.17 than one-half mile from a major transit stop, unless one of the following criteria are met: 9.18 (1) if all of the units are all -electric and efficient homes, the city or town must pennit 9.19 the development of at least three residential dwelling units on the lot; 9.20 (2) if at least two of the units are affordable housing, the city or town must permit the 9.21 development of at least three residential dwelling units on the lot; or 9.22 (3) if all of the units are all -electric and efficient homes and at least two of the units are 9.23 also affordable housing, the city or town must permit the development of at least four 9.24 residential dwelling units on the lot. 9.25 (b) Subject to section 462.358, subdivision 2a, a city of the second, third, or fourth class 9.26 or town must permit the development of at least four residential dwelling units on any 9.27 residential lot that is one-half mile or less from a major transit stop, unless one of the 9.28 followimz criteria are met: 9.29 (1) if all of the units are all -electric and efficient homes, the city or town must permit 9.30 the development of at least six residential dwelling units on the lot; 9.31 (2) if at least two of the units are affordable housing, the city or town must permit the 9.32 development of at least six residential dwelling units on the lot; or Sec. 8. 9 SF1370 REVISOR .1SK S1370-1 1st Engrossment 10.1 (3) if all of the units are all -electric and efficient homes and at least two of the units are 10.2 also affordable housing, the city or town must permit the development of at least eight 10.3 residential dwelling units on the lot. 10.4 (c) The requirements of this subdivision apply regardless of the types of middle housing 10,5 authorized by the city or town under subdivision 2. 10.6 (d) A municipality that does not approve a project under section 462.358, subdivision 10.7 2a, must provide the applicant with written justification and reasons for the disapproval log within seven days of the disapproval. Where insufficient infrastructure is the reason for 10.9 disapproval, a municipality must include from a public works director or a similarly qualified 10.10 person evidence in the written iustification. 10.11 Subd. 5. Municival standards. (a) Municipal official controls must not impose standards 10.12 that create practical difficulties in the placement or building of residential units on any lot. 10.13 (b) Any standards, performance conditions, or requirements imposed by a municipality 10.14 for residential dwelling units permitted under this section must allow for all missing middle 10.15 types authorized under subdivision 2 to be built. 10.16 (c) Any limits or restrictions on missing middle development must directly relate to 10.17 protecting public health, safety, and general welfare. 10.18 Subd. 6. Accessory dwelling units authorized. (a) An accessory dwelling unit may be 10.19 built on any residential lot in a municipality, regardless of total lot size, street frontage, 10.20 connectivity between the accessory dwelling unit and the primary dwelling on the lot, and 10.21 whether the lot is occupied by the property owner. 10.22 (b) A municipality may permit more than one accessory dwelling unit to be built on a 10.23 residential lot. 10.24 Subd. 7. Minimum lot size permitted. (a) A municipality may, by ordinance, require 10.25 a minimum lot size in accordance with this subdivision to which the density requirements 10.26 of subdivisions 3 and 4 apply. 10.27 (b) A minimum lot size for a city of the first class must not be greater than: 10.28 (1) 2,500 square feet for a single-family detached home, duplex, triplex, fourplex, 10.29 fiveplex, sixplex, stacked flat, and courtyard apartment; or 10.30 (2) 1,200 square feet for a townhome and cottage housing. 10.31 (c) A minimum lot size for a city of the second, third, or fourth class or a town must not 10.32 be greater than: Sec. 8. 10 SF1370 REVISOR JSK S1370-1 1st Engrossment 11.1 (1) 4,000 square feet for a single-family detached home, duplex, triplex, fourplex, 11.2 fiveplex, sixplex, stacked flat, and courtyard apartment; or 11.3 (2) 1,200 square feet for a townhome and cottage housing. 11.4 Subd. 8. Parking requirements limited. (a) A municipality may not require an off-street 11.5 parking space for a residential dwelling unit that is one-half mile or less from a major transit 11.6 sty. A municipality may require that disability parking spaces be provided in compliance 11.E with the Americans with Disabilities Act. 11.8 (b) A municipality may not require more than one off-street parking space per residential 11.9 dwelling unit that is over one-half mile from a major transit stop, except that additional 11.1 o disabilitv parkinv, spaces may be required to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 11.12 Subd. 9. Affordable housing; replacement required. For cities of the first class, 11.13 affordable housing on a residential lot may only be demolished or remodeled for the 11.14 construction of middle housing if the middle housing development will create at least as 11.15 many affordable housing units as exist in the structure to be demolished or remodeled. This 11.16 subdivision does not apply to housing in a blighted area defined under section 469.002, 11.17 subdivision 11. 11.18 Subd. 10. Alternative density plans. A municipality that adopts zoning controls prior 11.19 to June 30, 2025, that would allow for residential construction leading to an increase in 11.2o density of more than 100 percent in single family zones as permitted uses is not subject to 11.21 the requirements in this section. 11.22 Subd. 11. Exception. This section does not apply to any parcel located in a floodplain. 11.23 Subd. 12. State Building Code; State Fire Code. This section is subject to the 11 24 requirements under the State Building Code under chapter 32613 and the State Fire Code 11.25 under chapter 299F. 11.26 Sec. 9. 1462.35761 LIMITATION ON AESTHETIC MANDATES FOR CITIES. 11.27 A municipality must not condition approval of a residential building permit, residential 11.28 subdivision development, or residential planned unit development on the use of one or more 11.29 of the following, unless to conform with state and local historic district requirements, the 11 30 State Building Code in chapter 326B, and the State Fire Code in chapter 299F: 11.31 (1) specific materials for aesthetic reasons; Sec. 9. 11 SF1370 REVISOR JSK S1370-1 Ist Engrossment 12.1 (2) residential building or accessory structure to a residential building minimum square 12.2 footage or floor area ratios; 12.3 (3) design elements for aesthetic reasons including, but not limited to, decks, balconies, 12.4 porches, gables, roof pitch, and elevation design standards; 12.5 (4) garage square footage; or 12.6 (5) common space, pools, or any common property necessitating a homeowner's 12,7 association. 12.8 Sec. 10. 1462.35771 MUNICIPALITIES. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS. 12.9 (a) A municipality must not condition approval of a residential building permit, residential 12.1 o subdivision development, or residential planned unit development on the creation of a 12.11 homeowners association or on the inclusion of any terms in a homeowners association 12.12 bylaws, articles of incorporation, or any other governing document that is not required under 12.13 state law. 12.14 (b) A municipality must not require that a residential property be part of a homeowners 12.1 s association or provide an incentive for such membership. The municipality must also not 12,16 require or incentivize a homeowners association to adopt ternis or conditions not required 12.17 under state law. 12.18 Sec. 11. EFFECTIVE DATE. 12.19 This act is effective Julv 1, 2025. Sec. 11. 12 01/22/24 REVISOR KRB/RC 24-05943 as introduced SENATE STATE OF MINNESOTA NINETY-THIRD SESSION S.F. NO. 3572 (SENATE AUTHORS: FATEH, Boldon, Mann and Mitchell) DATE D-PG OFFICIAL STATUS 02/15/2024 11579 Introduction and fiist reading Referred to State and Local Government and Veterans 02/19/2024 11660 Author added Mitchell 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to local government; prohibiting minimum parking mandates; proposing 1.3 coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 462. 1.4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.5 Section 1. 1462.36551 MINIMUM PARKING MANDATES PROHIBITED. 1,6 (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, home rule charter, or ordinance to the 1.7 contrary, a political subdivision shall not impose minimum parking mandates for residential, 1.8 commercial, or industrial properties within its jurisdiction. 1.9 (b) For purposes of this section, "minimum parking mandate" means a law, rule, or 1.10 ordinance that specifies a minimum number of off-street vehicle parking spaces, including L 1 1 within a garage or other enclosed area. 1.12 (c) This section does not prohibit a political subdivision from passing an ordinance under 1.13 section 169.346, subdivision 4, related to disability parking spaces. This section does not 1.14 apply to bicycle parking requirements, including for electric -assisted bicycles. 1.15 (d) This section may be cited as the "Minnesota People Over Parking Act." Section 1. LALEAGUE o� C MINNESOTA CITIES Senate Committee Hears Multifamily Residential Development in Commercial Areas Bill April 22, 2024 The bill was amended by the committee to remove two concerning provisions for cities but was tabled and did not advance. On April 16, the Senate State and Local Government and Veterans Committee heard SF 4254 (Sen. Lindsey Port, DFL-Burnsville), which would require cities to accept multifamily residential development by right in commercial and certain industrial areas. The bill was amended by a delete -everything amendment (pdf), further amended during discussions, and laid over for possible omnibus bill inclusion. While the delete -everything amendment includes the vast majority of language in House version, HF 4010 (Rep. Alicia `Liish' Kozlowski, DFL-Duluth), which includes provisions seeking to address concerns raised by the League, SF 4254 as amended included two additional provisions that are problematic to cities. Amendment provisions and changes The delete -everything amendment included a provision that would have applied building permits to the 60-day rule in Minnesota Statute, section 15.99. This means if a city did not approve or deny the permit in 60-days, a building permit could have automatically been issued without adequate inspection and review. The other provision would have exempted a city's ability to preserve commercial property and would have required multifamily development constructed under the bill to be mixed use if the proposed development is being constructed in a "blighted area," as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 469.002. The League cited concerns with both provisions in testimony before the committee. During the hearing, Sen. Heather Gustafson (DFL-Vadnais Heights) offered an amendment (pdf)_to remove the two provisions. The amendment was adopted after a bipartisan 9-4 vote. Other amendments that were added to the bill prior to the it being tabled include: • Narrowly defining "public health, safety, and general welfare" for the purposes of city approval or denial of projects to fire safety, fire, and emergency services access, "insurmountable stress on existing local infrastructure," and traffic concerns related to developments with more than 300 units. Exempting developments that are 100% affordable (households with incomes at or below 60% of average median income) from official controls that cities could impose on projects constructed to be mixed -use properties. Read more news articles. Your LMC Resource Daniel Lightfoot IGR Representative & Federal Relations Manager (651) 281-1295 or (800) 925-1122 dlightfoot@lmc.org Planning Commission Agenda—05/07/24 4B. Community Development Director's Report Council Action on/related to Commission Recommendations • Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 824 for Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Sections 153.027 for Application Review and Procedures. Applicant: City of Monticello Approved on the City Council consent agenda on April 22, 2024. • Consideration of adopting Resolution No. 2024-37 approving a Final Plat of Country Club Manor Fourth Addition and the Country Club Manor Fourth Addition Development Agreement, and Resolution No. 2024-38 Adopting Assessments Pursuant to the Development Contract. Applicant: Monticello MF West LLC; CHC Monticello Townhomes II LLC Approved on the City Council consent agenda on April 22, 2024. • Consideration of adopting Resolution No. 2024-30 approving the Final Plat and Development Contract for Big River 445, adopting Resolution No. 2024-31 adopting assessments related to the plat of Big River 445, adopting Resolution No. 2024-32 approving a Final Stage PUD for the Big River 445 and adopting Resolution 2024-033 and Ordinance No. 823, establishing the Big River Planned Unit Development District. Applicant: Division 25, LLC. Approved on the City Council consent agenda on April 8, 2024. Closing and filing of the final plat expected in mid to late May, 2024. Housing Workshop Rescheduled A tentative date of Monday, June 24t" prior to the regular City Council meeting has been set for the rescheduled Housing Workshop. Department of Building Safety & Code Enforcement Presentation Chief Building Official Ron Hackenmueller provided an annual department update to the City Council on April 22, 2024. Mr. Hackenmueller will provide the presentation to the Commission at the June meeting. Development Status Current status update through April attached. Savanna Vista Apartments Residential Southeast area of The Pointes at Cedar 2100 unit multi -family apartments 12/13/2021 Under Construction- First Building Ant. Complete in Summer Twin Pines Apartments Residential South Side of School Blvd. East of Wal-Mart 96 multi -family unit apartment building 2/28/2022 Yet to Break Ground/Received Plat Ext. on 1/22/24 Received Temporary CO/Residential Units Being Rented/13,000 Block 52 Redevelopment Mixed -Use NE Corner of Highway 25 and Broadway St 87 multi -family units with rougly 30,000 sq ft of 1st floor commercial 9/30/2022 sq ft of Commercial Space being Built -Out Featherstone 6th Addition Residential North of 85th St NE and West of Highway 25 21 Single-family lots with commercially guided outlots for future development 8/24/2022 Under Construction (Last New Const. Permit Pulled) Tesla Stations at Cub Foods Commercial 206 7th St W Installation of 8 charging ports in the Cub Foods parking lot 7/12/2022 Completed Taco Bell Remodel Commercial 1247th St E Remodel of existing building and expansion of 724 sq ft 9/30/2022 Completed Reapproved Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Residential South of Farmstead Ave and West of Fallon Ave NE 59 Single -Family Lot Development 8/28/2023 Building Permits Being Issued for Homes Headwaters West Development Residential Along South side of 7th St W between Elm St and Golf Course Rd 82 Twinhomes Senior 55+Development 4/8/2024 Under Construction Sunny Days Therapy Commercial Along South side of 7th St E West of Old McDonald's Location Development of an Occupational Child Therapy Facility 8/22/2022 Completed - Ribbon Cutting was held on 11/16/2023 Camping World Commercial 3801 Chelsea Rd W Installation of an attached paint booth (1,100 sq ft) 8/22/2022 Nearing Completion Wiha Tools USA Industrial Along South Side of 7th St E across from Wright St and Ramsey St New construction light manufacturing (72,540 sq ft) 11/28/2022 Completed - Ribbon Cutting on 4/9/2024 Kwik Trip #345 Commercial 9440 State Highway 25 Expansion of current facility (520 sq ft) 1/23/2023 Completed Scooter's Coffee Commercial 100 7th St W. New Construction of Drive -Through Coffee Shop 1/23/2023 Completed Cargill Kitchens Solutions Industrial 206 W. 4th St. Replacement of Outdoor Storage Tanks 4/24/2023 Completed Deephaven 3 (Lot 2) Commercial Southeast corner of Cedar St and Chelsea Rd New Construction of a Clinic/Medical Service Facility (10,000 sq ft) N/A (Permitted Use) Completed - One Tenant Space to be Built -Out Culver's 2nd Drive -Through Aisle Commercial 9395 State Highway 25 Addition of a 2nd Drive -Through Aisle along the South Property Line 7/24/2023 Completed Jimmy Johns/Baskin Robbins Commercial Southeast Corner of Oakwood Drive E and Cedar Street New Construction of Quick Service Restaurant with Drive -Through Service 1/22/2024 Not Started Vacant property north of Chelsea Rd, south of Interstate 94, and west of PUD for New Construction of two commercial lots for a quick -service restaurant and Big River 445 PUD Commercial Fenning Avenue acoffee shop, with 6 lots platted for subsequent commercial development. 4/8/2024 Not Started .. Concept Stage PUD for expansion of existing site of potentially two additional buildings, Post Concept Stage PUD, Pre -Development Stage PUD Application StorageLink (Dundas Site) PUD Commercial 36 Dundas Road (Southeast corner of Dundas Road and Cedar Street) with the removal of temporary buildings along the South property line. Submittal 1.46 acre vacant lot along the West side of Fallon Ave NE between Washburn Post Concept Stage PUD, Pre -Development Stage PUD Application Mastercraft Outdoors PUD Industrial Computer Group and Norland Truck Sales Concept Stage PUD for development of a vacant site for an Industrial Service use Submittal Near the Southeast corner of 85th Street NE and Fallon Ave NE, Also South of Concept Stage PUD for a 298-unit residential development with various lot sizes and Post Concept Stage PUD, Pre -Development Stage PUD Application Haven Ridge West Residential 85th Street NE between Eislele Ave NE and Edmonson Ave NE townhome section Submittal 88 acres parcel bounded by The Meadows to the North, Highway 25 to the Commercial/Light West, 85th Street NE to the South, and the Featherston Residential Concept Stage PUD for a multi -phase Medical Office Buildings on roughly 25 acres, with Post Concept Stage PUD, Pre -Development Stage PUD Application Project MOB Industrial neighbohood to the East subsequent phases of private development to follow. Submittal 6321 E. Broadway Street bound by Interstate 94 to the North and East Concept Stage PUD for a 76-room hotel, 15,000 square -foot event center, 6,800 square- Post Concept Stage PUD, Pre -Development Stage PUD Application Broadway Plaza PUD Commercial Broadway Street to the South foot restaurant, and a 6,000 square -foot post -frame building. Submittal M GoodNeighbor - Pointes at Cedar Concept Plan for construction of a 98-roam hotel and restaurant in the northern "Populus" Post Pointes at Cedar Concept Plan Submittal Review Meeting, Pre - Development Commercial Along south side of Chelsea Road directly north of Deephaven Apartments biome of the Pointes at Cedar District Development Stage Permit Application Submittal