The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 06-24-20241. Agenda Documents Documents: 06-24-24 AGENDA.PDF 2024-6-10 MINUTES CC (DRAFT).PDF 2A PAYMENT OF BILLS.PDF 2B NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES.PDF 2C PROPERTY.PDF 2D DONATION.PDF 2E ELECTION WRITE-IN VOTES.PDF 2F GAMBLING PERMIT CENTER COURT CLUB.PDF 2G TIF 1-43 DISTRICT MODIFICATION.PDF 2H COMMUNICATION PROPOSAL.PDF 21 WRECKER TOWING AMENDMENT.PDF 2J BOBS TOWING CUP.PDF 2K DAYCARE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT.PDF 2L STORAGELINK PUD.PDF 2M DEEPHAVEN 3 VACATE.PDF 2N CSAH 39 WEST UTILITY CONSULTANT AWARD.PDF 20 LUNDA LEASE AGREEMENT- HWY 25 PROJECT.PDF 2P WALK AND ROLL DONATIONS.PDF 2Q COUNTRY CLUB MANOR RELEASE.PDF 2R ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD JUDGES.PDF 3A PH-TIF 1-42 MODIFICATION.PDF AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 24, 2024 Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION/EDA) WORKSHOP (Bridge Room) 4:30 p.m. 2024 Housing Workshop Mayor: Lloyd Hilgart Council Members: Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie, Sam Murdoff 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes from June 10, 2024 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, except for referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates F. Council Liaison Update • Economic Development Authority (EDA) • Library Board G. Department Updates • Engineering/Public Works Update • Construction Update 2. Consent Agenda — All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-50 accepting donations of $3,500 from Cargill for the Monticello Community Center Romp and Stomp and $500 from the Monticello Lions to the Fire Relief Association for the Fire Department golf fundraiser Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-51 regarding the tally of write-in votes for local elections/city offices Consideration of approving charitable gambling permit for Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services, Inc. for a raffle being held October 9, 2024, at their building located at 406 East 7t" Street G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-52 authorizing a modification of Tax Increment Financing District (TIF) District 1-43 (CHC [Headwaters] twin homes project) within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1; and the Amendess H. Consideration of approving the engagement of ippi Creative for City communication efforts including the 2024 local option sales tax initiative and other as -needed communication priorities Consideration of adopting Ordinance 827 amending the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.012 — Definitions, and 153.091— Use -Specific Standards related to Wrecker & Towing Services as a principal use including Definitions, Use -Specific Standards, and other regulations as necessary to define and limit the intent of application of the proposed amendment. Applicant: City of Monticello Consideration of approving a Conditional Use Permit for Wrecker and Towing Services as a principal use in the B-3, Highway Business District. Applicant: Nick Christenson o/b/o Bob's Towing K. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 828 amending Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153 Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.091, Use -Specific Standards, as related to Day Care Centers as a principal use in the Industrial & Business Campus (IBC) District. Applicant: City of Monticello L. Consideration of approving a Preliminary and Final Plat and Development Contract for Cedar Street Storage; revocation of an existing Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development; approving a Development & Final Stage Planned Unit Development; and adopting Ordinance rezoning to Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Bruce Stainbrook o/b/o Storagel-ink M. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-57 calling for a public hearing on July 22, 2024, for vacation of drainage and utility easements as legally described for a portion of Deephaven 3 N. Consideration of authorizing WSB to provide engineering services for the CSAH 39 West Utility Extension Project for a total cost of $171,427 0. Consideration of approving a lease agreement with Lunda Construction Company for the placement of a field office trailer for the MNDOT Highway 25 re -decking project at property located at 119 3rd Street East P. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-58 accepting donations for Walk and Roll Q. Consideration of approving Release of Development Contract and Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 5 Country Club Manor Third Addition and Partial Release from Development Contract and Planned Unit Development for Outlot A Country Club Manor Third Addition. Applicant: Headwaters/CHC R. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-60 establishing an Absentee Ballot Board for the 2024 Primary and General Elections 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings A. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-59 authorizing a modification of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 1-42 (CHC [Headwaters] twin homes project) within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1; and the Amended and Restated Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan relating thereto 5. Regular Agenda 6. Adjournment REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 10, 2024— 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie, and Sam Murdoff Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Hilgart called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Agenda Councilmember Gabler motioned to approve of the agenda. Councilmember Hinz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes from May 28, 2024 Councilmember Gabler moved to approve the minutes. Councilmember Murdoff seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments None. E. Public Service Announcements Y Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk, noted the following public announcements: • Juneteenth Business Hours • Bubble & Foam Party • Movie in the Park F. Council Liaison Updates • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler gave an update of the meeting held on June 4. The Planning Commission held five public hearings. One was tables, but four of them will be brought to City Council on June 24. These included wrecker -towing ordinance, Bob's Towing CUP, StorageLink, and daycare ordinance amendments. • Industrial & Economic Development Committee (IEDC) — Councilmember Murdoff provided a brief update of the meeting held June 5, 2024. The group heard a legislative update by Senator Bruce Anderson and updates by Wright County Economic Development and Chamber of Commerce. City Council Minutes: June 10, 2024 Page 1 1 4 G. Department Updates • Construction Update — Matt Leonard, Public Works Director/City Engineer, gave an update on current construction projects. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Murdoff moved to adopt the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Hinz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Action taken: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total of $2,457,221.83. B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments. Action taken: Approved new hires for the Monticello Community Center, Parks Department, and Streets Department and terminations for Communications. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Action taken: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-45 accepting a donation of $917.18 from the Monticello Fire Relief Association for the purchase of chainsaws for the Fire Department. Action taken: Adopted Resolution 2024-45 accepting the donation. E. Consideration of approving two temporary charitable gambling permit applications for raffles to be held by the Monticello Center Court Club on August 24, 2024, for their 4t" Annual Community Tailgate Party and February 20, 2025, for the Magic Monticello High School Touchdown Booster Club. Action taken: Approved both of the temporary charitable gambling applications for the Monticello Center Court Club. F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-46 approving a gambling premise permit for Community Charities of Minnesota to conduct gambling at Nordic Brewpub located at 530 Cedar Street. Action taken: Adopted Resolution 2024- 46 approving the gambling premise permit. G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-47 approving a gambling premise permit for the Northwest Area Jaycees to conduct gambling at the Liquor Lounge located at 124 W Broadway Street. Action taken: Adopted Resolution 2024-47 approving the gambling premise permit. H. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 826 amending Chapter 36, Fee Schedule, of the Monticello City Code to add a permit/application fee for the keeping of large animals. Action taken: Adopted Ordinance 826 amending the fee schedule. City Council Minutes: June 10, 2024 Page 2 1 4 Consideration of approving a special event permit allowing use of Ellison Park, Pioneer Park, core City right-of-way, Community Center parking lot and related assistance in conjunction with the annual Riverfest celebration on July 12-14, 2024. Action taken: Approved the special event permit for Riverfest. J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-48 authorizing a Community Energy Transition (CET) Grant Agreement with MN -DEED in the amount of $1,000,000 for Municipal Trunk Utility Extensions along County Road 39 to the Northwest Growth Area. Action taken: Adopted Resolution 2024-48 authorizing the CET grant agreement. K. Consideration of authorizing HR Green to provide grant writing services in connection with the MN -DEED Community Energy Transition (CET) Grant Program in the amount of up to $5,000. Action taken: Authorized HR Green to provide the grant writing services in the amount of up to $5,000. L. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-49 calling for a public hearing on July 8, 2024, for vacation of drainage and utility easements as legally described for a portion of Amax Addition. Action taken: Adopted Resolution 2024-49 calling for the public hearing. M. Consideration to approving a special event permit allowing use of Ellison Park, City streets, and related assistance for Party in the Park on July 11, 2024. Applicant: Monticello Chamber of Commerce. Action taken: Approved the special event permit for Party in the Park. N. Consideration of approving a special event permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction with Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello on Saturday, July 13, 2024. Applicant: Chamber of Commerce. Action taken: Approved the special event permit for Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello. 0. Consideration of approving a special event permit for the 10U State Qualifiers Softball Tournament taking place on June 22-23, 2024, at the Monticello High School Softball fields. Applicant: Natalie Schuneman. Action taken: Approved the special event permit for 10U State Qualifiers. 3. Public Hearings: 4. Regular Agenda: 6. Adiournment: The meeting was adjourned at 6:41 p.m. City Council Minutes: June 10, 2024 Page 3 1 4 Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes: June 10, 2024 Page 4 14 City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2A. Consideration of approving payment of bills Prepared by: Meeting Date Finance Director 6/24/2024 Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A City Clerk ACTION REQUESTED ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $2,136,755.47. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. I. Budget Impact: N/A II. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of bill and purchase card registers as presented. SUPPORTING DATA • Bill registers and purchase card registers Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date User: debbie.gulbrandson Printed: 6/17/2024 2:46 PM � MontiTY ce-o Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount ACH 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO 06/15/2024 4,510.63 ACH 2282 MRI SOFTWARE 06/15/2024 240.00 ACH 2405 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges/Returt 06/15/2024 17,857.37 ACH 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC 06/15/2024 120.18 ACH 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 06/15/2024 120,462.10 ACH 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 06/15/2024 3,439.09 ACH 4263 CAYAN 06/15/2024 1,808.04 ACH 5147 MN PEIP 06/15/2024 59,398.23 ACH 6041 HEALTHEQUITY INC 06/15/2024 526.60 ACH 6271 CLUB AUTOMATION - DAXCO LLC 06/15/2024 1,398.00 Total for 6/15/2024: 209,760.24 Report Total (10 checks): 209,760.24 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/25/2024 Approved by: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (6/17/2024 2:46 PM) Page 1 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date User: julie.cheney Printed: 6/18/2024 4:01 PM � MontCITY iOF ce-o Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount ACH 1006 ABM EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY LLC 06/25/2024 967.25 ACH 1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY 06/25/2024 2,652.45 ACH 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 06/25/2024 8,479.40 ACH 1074 BOLTON AND MENK INC 06/25/2024 41,143.00 ACH 1083 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 06/25/2024 6,898.50 ACH 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 06/25/2024 2,583.00 ACH 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 06/25/2024 78.00 ACH 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 06/25/2024 82,471.34 ACH 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/25/2024 905.95 ACH 1187 FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING LLC 06/25/2024 158.89 ACH 1206 WINEBOW INC. 06/25/2024 220.00 ACH 1223 HAWKINS INC 06/25/2024 13,297.24 ACH 1273 KIWI KAI IMPORTS, INC. 06/25/2024 948.50 ACH 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, I 06/25/2024 2,513.53 ACH 1364 MOBILE HEALTH SERVICES LLC 06/25/2024 140.00 ACH 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER 06/25/2024 5,625.00 ACH 1386 M-R SIGN CO INC 06/25/2024 1,880.24 ACH 1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 06/25/2024 3,012.81 ACH 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC 06/25/2024 352.35 ACH 1417 OSC OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY 06/25/2024 54.94 ACH 1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC 06/25/2024 335.00 ACH 1518 TDS TELECOM 06/25/2024 343.52 ACH 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 06/25/2024 891.75 ACH 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 06/25/2024 270.00 ACH 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC 06/25/2024 1,168.85 ACH 1572 THE WINE COMPANY 06/25/2024 767.00 ACH 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH 06/25/2024 287,927.94 ACH 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 06/25/2024 4,092.50 ACH 1684 VINOCOPIA 06/25/2024 1,234.52 ACH 1726 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES 06/25/2024 418.86 ACH 2139 ADVANCED FIRST AID INC 06/25/2024 2,476.00 ACH 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH 06/25/2024 5,785.44 ACH 2808 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO 06/25/2024 37,244.91 ACH 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC 06/25/2024 550.00 ACH 3762 GARRETTS DIAMOND CITY BREAD 06/25/2024 61.00 ACH 4194 JENNIFER SCHREIBER 06/25/2024 164.09 ACH 4502 ARVIG 06/25/2024 165.00 ACH 4633 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 06/25/2024 518.17 ACH 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 06/25/2024 11,664.58 ACH 4832 TIFCO INDUSTRIES, INC. 06/25/2024 266.64 ACH 5201 DICK FAMILY, INC. 06/25/2024 1,637.50 ACH 5211 RANDI O'KEEFE KRIER 06/25/2024 1,946.88 ACH 5426 NOVEL SOLAR TWO LLC 06/25/2024 30,992.06 ACH 5454 PROFESSIONAL CLEANING SERVICES 06/25/2024 11,645.00 ACH 5585 SBRK FINANCE HOLDINGS INC 06/25/2024 71.00 ACH 5622 ELIZABETH LINDRUD 06/25/2024 975.06 ACH 5998 SADIE NIELSEN 06/25/2024 600.00 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (6/18/2024 4:01 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount ACH 6285 NOKOMIS ENERGY LLC 06/25/2024 10,557.30 ACH 6300 NOVEL SOLAR ONE LLC 06/25/2024 5,434.08 ACH 6301 NOVEL SOLAR FIVE LLC 06/25/2024 247.93 ACH 6306 STONEBROOKE ENGINEERING INC 06/25/2024 18,494.90 ACH 6311 PRECISE MRM LLC 06/25/2024 960.00 ACH 6418 ALISHA GRUE 06/25/2024 99.99 128598 5948 AE2 - ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC. 06/25/2024 4,411.25 128599 6381 DAVID AMITRANO 06/25/2024 2,000.00 128600 6421 KEN ANDERSON 06/25/2024 1,500.00 128601 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 06/25/2024 247.65 128602 1368 AUTO VALUE MONTICELLO 06/25/2024 37.99 128603 6420 BECKER COMMUNITY CENTER 06/25/2024 150.00 128604 6382 JUSTIN BERGO 06/25/2024 1,000.00 128605 1067 BERNICK'S 06/25/2024 4,913.76 128606 6208 BLOCK 52 HOLDINGS LLC 06/25/2024 292,667.00 128607 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & 06/25/2024 2,125.50 128608 1103 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS INC 06/25/2024 383.50 128609 6050 CHRISTENSEN GROUP INSURANCE 06/25/2024 3,450.00 128610 5105 DELL MARKETING LP 06/25/2024 321.48 128611 5873 ECOWATER 06/25/2024 32.50 128612 1179 FIRE SAFETY USA INC 06/25/2024 1,000.00 128613 6245 G & M OUTDOORS 06/25/2024 2,350.00 128614 6770 GHS TENT RENTAL 06/25/2024 372.19 128615 1205 GRAINGER INC 06/25/2024 589.36 128616 5840 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES 06/25/2024 159,078.13 128617 6404 GLORIA HLEBICHUK 06/25/2024 50.00 128618 6375 THE HOME CITY ICE COMPANY 06/25/2024 309.33 128619 4745 ILLINOIS CASUALTY COMPANY 06/25/2024 1,781.00 128620 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 06/25/2024 29,445.74 128621 5687 JOHNSON CONTROLS US HOLDINGS 1 06/25/2024 959.74 128622 6248 JP BROOKS 06/25/2024 14,000.00 128623 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTEREE 06/25/2024 3,821.50 128624 3833 CLAUDIAMENZEL 06/25/2024 232.24 128625 3671 MIDWAYFORD 06/25/2024 56,186.10 128626 1328 MIDWAY IRON & METAL CO INC 06/25/2024 299.34 128627 4317 MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF CEME7 06/25/2024 75.00 128628 4216 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 06/25/2024 239.66 128629 2512 MONTICELLO PLBG HTG AC LLC 06/25/2024 1,967.00 128630 1913 NEW FRANCE WINE 06/25/2024 589.67 128631 1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC 06/25/2024 4,762.50 128632 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC 06/25/2024 450.90 128633 4345 OPG-3INC 06/25/2024 13,563.91 128634 4615 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC 06/25/2024 1,916.00 128635 6416 PEGASUS RECONDITIONING INC 06/25/2024 2,469.90 128636 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 06/25/2024 15,875.63 128637 3574 PREFERRED TITLE INC 06/25/2024 663,872.42 128638 2074 RIVERWOOD BANK 06/25/2024 960.00 128639 6277 KENNETH ROUSH 06/25/2024 29.00 128640 4781 RUE 38 LLC 06/25/2024 372.50 128641 4148 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. #3442 06/25/2024 336.11 128642 6417 JASON SMALL 06/25/2024 90.00 128643 6013 JAMES W SORENSON 06/25/2024 2,000.00 128644 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPII 06/25/2024 3,737.67 128645 6018 SR. PERSPECTIVE 06/25/2024 100.00 128646 2397 TOWMASTER 06/25/2024 531.81 128647 4859 TRIO SUPPLY COMPANY 06/25/2024 892.51 128648 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE 06/25/2024 2,183.80 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (6/18/2024 4:01 PM) Page 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date 128649 5738 UTILITYLOGIC 06/25/2024 128650 6398 VILLAS OF AUTUMN RIDGE HOME O` 06/25/2024 128651 6396 VILLAS OF KLEIN FARM ASSOCIATIO 06/25/2024 128652 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC 06/25/2024 128653 5027 ERICA WITZMANN 06/25/2024 128654 5795 WRIGHT COUNTY FINANCE & TAXPA 06/25/2024 Total for 6/25/2024: Report Total (110 checks): The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/25/24 Approved by: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart Check Amount 76.60 5,500.00 2,500.00 2,666.48 1,130.00 1.00 1,926,995.23 1,926,995.23 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (6/18/2024 4:01 PM) Page 3 City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Human Resources Manager 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A City Clerk ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve new hires and departures for city departments. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Council is asked to ratify the attached list of new hires and departures for the City. This listing includes full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary employees. The listing may also include status changes and promotions. I. Budget Impact: Positions are generally included in the budget. II. Staff Workload Impact: If new position, there may be some training involved. If terminated position, existing staff will cover hours as needed, until replacement. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of new hires and departures as identified on the attached list. SUPPORTING DATA • List of new hires and terminated employees. NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Santiago Castro Lifeguard MCC 6/18/2024 PT Lynn Sakkinen DMV Clerk DMV 6/26/2024 PT Jenny Jerome DMV Clerk DMV 6/26/2024 PT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Effective Date Class Reese Smith Voluntary MCC 5/21/2024 PT Gianna Duszynski Voluntary MCC 5/30/2024 PT Danielle Budish Voluntary MCC 5/30/2024 PT Vickie Ammons Voluntary Liquor Store 6/17/2024 PT Hayden Stensgard Voluntary Community Development 6/21/2024 FT Roger Hoglund Involuntary Streets 6/24/2024 FT New Hire and Terms City Council 2024: 6/18/2024 City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item N/A 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A N/A There is no report this City Council Cycle. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-50 accepting donations of $3,500 from Cargill for the Monticello Community Center Romp & Stomp and $500 from the Monticello Lions to the Fire Relief Association for the Fire Department golf fundraiser Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item City Clerk 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A N/A ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-50 accepting donations of $3,500 from Cargill for the MCC Romp and Stomp and $500 from Monticello Lions to the Fire Relief Association for the Fire Department golf fundraiser. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City received a donation from Cargill Monticello in the amount of $3,500 to help fund the purchase and installation of Phase 2 of the MCC Romp & Stomp indoor playground. The first phase was completed in 2022. The second phase will add additional crawl tubes, a swirl slide, and protective rubber surfacing. This final phase will complete the Romp & Stomp playground, which costs between $45,000 and $50,000 in total. The project will commence once additional funding is secured to cover the entire cost. The City also received $500 from the Monticello Lions to the Fire Relief Association for the Fire Department golf fundraiser. As required by state statute, the City Council needs to accept the donations by resolution. Budget Impact: The donations received will offset costs as noted. II. Staff Workload Impact: N/A III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend accepting the donation. SUPPORTING DATA • Resolution 2024-50 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-50 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY Monticello Lions Cargill Monticello DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE—F Fire Relief Assocation - Fire Department Golf Fundraiser MCC Romp & Stomp CASH $500 $3,500 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the purpose stated above. Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 24t" day of June, 2024. Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-51 regarding the tally of write-in votes for local elections/city offices Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item City Clerk 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Finance Director N/A ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-51 regarding the tally of write-in votes for local elections/city offices. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Minnesota Statute 20413.09, subd.3(b)(2) was amended in 2023 to allow statutory cities to adopt a resolution governing the counting of write-in votes for local elective offices. Sometimes, write-in votes are cast for Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and other fictional characters. Voters may also cast a vote for themselves or someone they know. The amount of time and energy to have two judges review and record write-ins is time consuming. The statute allows for more efficient tracking of write in votes. Local options including adopting one of the following: • Require the candidate to file a written request with the chief election official no later than the seventh day before the city election if the candidate wants to have their write- in votes individually recorded; or • Require that write-in votes for an individual candidate only be individually recorded if the total number of write-in votes for that office is equal to or greater than the fewest number of non -write-in votes for a ballot candidate. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution for the latter option requiring that write-in votes for an individual candidate only be individually recorded if the total number of write-in votes for that office is equal to or greater than the fewest number of non -write-in votes for a ballot candidate. Once adopted, the resolution will remain in effect until a subsequent resolution changing the requirement is adopted. Budget Impact: Minimal impact for adopting the ordinance. II. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal administrative time. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends adoption of the resolution. SUPPORTING DATA • Draft Resolution 2024-51 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY RESOLUTION 2024-51 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING RECORDING OF WRITE-IN VOTES WHEREAS, the City of Monticello regularly holds elections for local elective office; and WHEREAS, voters at the elections may cast a ballot for a write-in candidate for a local elective office; and WHEREAS, in 2023, the Minnesota Legislature amended Minnesota Statute, Section 20413.09, subdivision 3, authorizing the City to adopt a resolution governing the counting of write-in votes for local elective office; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 20413.09, subdivision 3(b)(2), by adopting a resolution the City may require that write-in votes for an individual candidate only be individually recorded if the total number of write-in votes for that office is equal to or greater than the fewest number of non -write-in votes for a ballot candidate; and WHEREAS, to better administer the City's local elections for office the City Council desires to implement the authority provided in Minnesota Statute 204B.09, subd.3(b)(2). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, that write-in votes for an individual candidate for local elective office shall only be individually recorded if the total number of write-in votes for that office is equal to or greater than the fewest number of non -write-in votes for a ballot candidate. ADOPTED this 241" day of June, 2024. Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2F. Consideration of approving temporary charitable gambling permit application for Central MN Jobs and Training Services, Inc. for a raffle to be held October 9, 2024, at their location of 406 East 7th Street Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item City Clerk 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A N/A ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve a temporary charitable gambling permit application for Central MN Jobs and Training Services, Inc. for a raffle on October 9, 2024, at their location of 406 East 71h Street. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Central MN Jobs and Training Services submitted an application for a temporary charitable gambling permit. This permit is for a raffle to be held October 9, 2024, in conjunction with an open house event. To receive a permit from the State, the City must approve the application. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of the temporary gambling permit. SUPPORTING DATA • Application MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 4/23 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 of 3 An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit Application Fee (non-refundable) organization that: Applications are processed in the order received. If the application conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. year. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite your county by calling 651-539-1900. service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Organization Name: Central MN Jobs and Traininq Services, Inc Minnesota Tax ID Number, if any: Mailing Address: PO Box 720 City: Monticello State: MN Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO): Dina Wuornos Previous Gambling Permit Number: X- Federal Employer ID 41-1484048 Number (FEIN), if any: Zip: 55309 County: Wriclht CEO Daytime Phone: 612.325.1652 CEO Email: dwuornos@cmlts.orq (permit will be emailed to this email address unless otherwise indicated below) Email permit to (if other than the CEO): Ikampa@cmlts.orq NONPROFIT STATUS Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): = Fraternal = Religious Veterans �✓ Other Nonprofit Organization Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status: (DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.) ❑✓ A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers: 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803, or toll free 1-877-551-6767 ❑ IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500. ❑ IRS - Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter) If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling; and 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services, Inc. Physical Address (do not use P.O. box): 406 East 7th St. Check one: ❑ City: Monticello ❑ Township: Zip: 55362 Zip Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): October 9, 2024 Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: County: Wriqht County: = Bingo 0 Paddlewheels = Pull -Tabs = Tipboards 0 Raffle Gambling equipment for bingo paper, bingo boards, raffle boards, paddlewheels, pull -tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo ball selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the List of Licensees tab, or call 651-539-1900. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 4/23 Page 2 of 3 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located within city limits The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a 1st class city). ❑The application is denied. Print City Name: Signature of City Personnel: Title: Date: The city or county must sign before submitting application to the Gambling Control Board. COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located in a township The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. ❑The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. ❑The application is denied. Print County Name: Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date: TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to the Board within 30 days of the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature: Date: 6/05/24 (Signature ust be CEO's signature; designee may not sign) Print Name: Dina Wuornos REQUIREMENTS MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Complete a separate application for: Mail application with: • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days; or a copy of your proof of nonprofit status; and • all gambling conducted on one day. application fee (non-refundable). If the application is Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, conducted on the same day. the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota. gambling activity is done: To: Minnesota Gambling Control Board A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Roseville, MN 55113 Board. Questions? Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). 651-539-1900. Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to supply the information; however, if your organization refuses to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your organization's qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your organization supplies the information requested, the Board will be able to process the application. Your organization's name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All other information provided will be private data about your organization until the Board issues the permit. When the Board issues the permit, all information provided will become public. If the Board does not issue a permit, all information provided remains private, with the exception of your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about your organization are available to Board members, Board staff whose work requires access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- ment of Public Safety; Attorney General; Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota Management & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this notice was given; and anyone with your written consent. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. An equal opportunity employer 4/23 Page 3 of 3 How You May How You May Not Spend Gambling Funds Spend Gambling Funds Allowable expenses - Gambling funds may be spent for allowable expenses, such as: • gambling equipment (pull -tabs, bingo paper, bingo blower, paddlewheel tickets, tipboard games); • advertising; • printing raffle tickets; or • any services or goods that are directly related to the conduct of your gambling. Charitable contributions - Gambling funds may be spent for the following charitable contributions (lawful purpose): • to or by 501(c)(3) organization and 501(c)(4) festival organizations; • relieving the effects of poverty, homelessness, or disability; • problem gambling programs approved by the Minnesota Department of Human Services; • public or private nonprofit school; • scholarships (if a contribution is made to a scholarship fund, it must be made to a nonprofit organization whose primary mission is to award scholarships); • church; • recognition of military service (open to public) or active military personnel in need; • activities and facilities benefiting youth under age 21; • citizen monitoring of surface water quality, with data submitted to Minnesota PCA; • unit of government (NOTE: A direct contribution to a law enforcement or prosecutorial agency is not allowed); • wildlife management projects or activities that benefit the public -at -large, with DNR approval; • grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all -terrain trails that are grant-in-aid trails, or other trails open to public use, with DNR approval; • supplies and materials for DNR training and educational programs; • nutritional programs, food shelves, and congregate dining programs primarily for persons who are 62 or older or disabled; • community arts organizations or programs; • humanitarian service recognizing volunteerism or philanthropy; and • acquisition and repair of real property and capital assets (contact the Gambling Control Board for requirements). Controlled contribution - An organization may not retain any control over any contribution made from gambling funds. The only exception is for expenditures by a 501(c)(3) organization or a 501(c)(4) festival organization to its general fund. 2. Financial gain - A contribution or expenditure may not be made if it results in any monetary, economic, financial, or material benefit to the organization making the contribution or expenditure. Government - An expenditure may not be made for: • influencing the nomination or election of a candidate for public office; • promoting or defeating a ballot question; or • any activity intended to influence an election or a governmental decision - making process. 4. Law enforcement - A direct contribution may not be made to a law enforcement or prosecutorial agency. 5. Pension - A contribution may not be made to a government pension or retirement fund, such as a fire relief association. 6. Conflict of interest - A contribution or expenditure may not be made if it is not allowed under the conflict of interest provisions of the Minnesota Nonprofit Corpo-ration Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 317A.255. 7. Alcohol - An expenditure may not be made for the purchase of any intoxicating liquor, wine, or malt beverages. 8. Fundraising - An expenditure may not be made for fundraising costs, except as allowed for a 501(c)(3) organization or 501(c)(4) festival organization from its general fund. 9. Other organizations - With few excep- tions, gambling funds may not be contrib- uted to other organizations or clubs such as veterans, fraternal, Lions, etc. unless it is a 501(c)(3) organization. 10. Other contributions - A contribution may not be made to a 501(c)(3) organization or another entity with the intent or effect of not complying with lawful purpose restrictions or requirements. Minnesota Gambling Control Board 2023 MINN ESOTA GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD BINGO AND RAFFLE - Checklist for Excluded/Exempt Permits The purpose of this form is to help your organization conduct excluded/exempt gambling in compliance with the requirements listed below. Exempt and Excluded activities cannot be conducted in the same calendar year. The five forms of lawful gambling are bingo, paddlewheels, pull -tabs, raffles and tipboards. Detailed information regarding each requirement is available by clicking on the following links [in blue italics]: 1) applicable statutes and rules; 2) the Lawful Gambling Manual; 3) the online class, "Conduct of Raffles"; and 4) the phone number and email address of your county's Licensing (license, permits and leases) and Compliance (conduct and reporting) Specialists. Check Box RAFFLES 1. Tickets are printed in accordance with MN Rule 7861.0310. 2. Tickets contain the sequential number of the raffle ticket. Theatre style tickets may be used. (349.173) 3. A list of prizes and a statement of other relevant information is made available to ticket purchasers. (349.173) 4. The organization must pay in full or otherwise become the owner of all prizes prior to the raffle drawing, except for raffles with gross receipts of $60 or less. (7861.0260) 5. A merchandise certificate is used when a prize requiring registration or licensure (guns, cars, ATVs, etc.) is offered. (7861.0260) 6. Prizes must not consist of lawful gambling equipment including raffle tickets for another raffle. (7861.0260) 7. The total value of lawful gambling prizes awarded (use fair market value for donated prizes) does not exceed $50,000 in a calendar year. (349.166) 8. Cash must not be substituted for merchandise prizes that have been won. (7861.0260 Subp. 4C(2)) 9. Alcohol is only awarded as a prize to persons who demonstrate that they are 21 years of age or older. (340A.707) 10.Only cash, personal checks, cashier's checks, money orders, travelers' checks, and debit cards may be accepted for the purchase of tickets (NO CREDIT CARDS - NO INTERNET SALES). (349.2127) (7861.0260) 11. The method of winner selection cannot be manipulated or based on the outcome of an event not under the organization's control. (349.173) 12. Persons are not required to be present at a raffle drawing to be eligible to win. (349.173) (7861.0310) 13. Raffle tickets are not sold to or won by persons under age 18. (349.181) (7861.0310) 14. Purchasers are not required to buy anything other than the ticket. (349.173) (7861.0310) 15. Clear and legible house rules in accordance with MN Rule 7861.0310 are prominently posted at the point of winner selection. 16. An exempt permit financial report (LG220A) must be submitted to the Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the gambling occasion. (349.166) BINGO 1. Clear and legible house rules in accordance with MN Rule 7861.0270 are prominently posted at the point of winner selection. 2. House rules include the policy on declaring bingo and last number called. (7861.0270 Subp. 2A(1)) 3. House rules include the reasons for potentially cancelling bingo occasions. (7861.0270 Subp. 2A(1)) 4. All sales must be on a cash basis and take place at the permitted premises during or immediately prior to the bingo occasion. (NO CREDIT CARDS- NO INTERNET SALES) (7861.0270Subp. 5B(1)) 5. Bingo paper must not be offered for free or discounted unless the price is reduced with a coupon. (7861.0270 Subp. 5B(7)) 6. Bingo balls must be available for inspection by at least one player before the occasion begins to determine that all are present and in operating condition. (7861.0270 Subp. 3A) 7. No reservation of bingo cards or bingo paper for any person (7861.0270 Subp. 3F) 8. Bingo records (including bingo program) must be kept for 3% years. (7861.0270 Subp. 11) BINGO AND RAFFLES 1. Gambling records must be kept for 3% years. (7861.0310) 2. Gambling funds may only be spent for allowable expenses and lawful purposes. (349.12 Subd. 3a) (349.12 Subd. 25) (mn.gov/gcb/faq-exemptexcluded.html) and (mn.gov/gcb/assets/infosheetspendinggamblingfunds.pdf) 7/23 City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-52 Authorizing a Modification of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District No. 1-43 (CHC [Headwaters) twin homes Projectl within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Proiect No. 1 Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Economic Development Manager 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City Clerk Finance Director, City Clerk ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-52 authorizing a modification of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 1-43 within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1. PREVIOUS ACTIONS February 14, 2022: The TIF Plan was adopted and the TIF District was established to support the development of 60 twin home units serving the age 55+ demographic with an estimated total project cost of approximately $22,300,000. May 23, 2022: The TIF Plan was modified to accurately reflect the land value of the EDA site as determined through an appraisal by Nagell Appraisal, Incorporated. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Before Council is a modification of TIF District 1-43 of a slight decrease in the size of the District. The change in district size is primarily due to a small portion of the TIF District 1-43 land area being shifted into TIF District 1-42 to accommodate the revised development plan consisting of twin homes rather than an apartment building. An incorrect legal description in the TIF Development Contract is also being corrected. The EDA attorney clarified that the proposed modification to TIF District 1-43 is a technical administrative change and is consistent with the redevelopment -development plan for the project. There are no other proposed changes to TIF District 1-43. The TIF 1-43 development project consisting of 60 units is currently about 77 percent completed or nearing completion. Of those 46 permitted units, 13 have receiving Certificates of Occupancy which translates into rental residents being allowed to move in. CHC Monticello, the developer, indicated that it is seeing high levels of interest for the rental twin homes and expects all 60 units to be filled by the end of 2024. A total of 24 units are required to be City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 affordable to households with incomes at or below 60 percent of the area median income (Wright County). The twin home development is intended to serve the age 55+ demographic. The EDA will also consider the TIF 1-43 modification at its regular meeting on June 26, 2024. Budget Impact: There is a minimal budget impact related to the consideration of the amended and restated TIF District Plan and the TIF District modification. Costs incurred in the review process will be covered by CHC Monticello's TIF Application fee deposit payment. II. Staff Impact: Staff involved in the work tasks related to the proposed TIF District 1-43 modification include the City Administrator, Community Development Director, Economic Development Manager, and Finance Director. Consultant work tasks were also completed by the EDA attorney, Kennedy & Grave, and staff at Northland Securities. No other staff are needed to complete the work tasks related to this consideration. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Vision adopted as part of the Monticello 2040 Plan is to create a friendly and safe community which is inclusive and fosters a sense of belonging. The city adopted a strategy for housing which includes developing a range of housing choice and opportunity. As residents move through their career paths and family status, their housing needs change. As an actively developing community, Monticello seeks to provide opportunities for a full range of "life cycle" housing options allowing them to stay and grow with our community. This proposal meets a specific housing need in the community, which is further supported by the 2020 Housing Study. The proposed project also meets the Monticello 2040 goal for growing from within, as it is also located within the city on an underutilized parcel of land. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution 2024-52 authorizing a modification to TIF District 1-43, decreasing the size of the District by a small amount of land and addressing an incorrect legal description in the TIF Development contract. The modifications are technical administrative changes and do not alter the development plan, scale or timeline. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2024-52 B. Map of TIF District 1-43 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-52 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-43 WHEREAS, on February 23, 2022, the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") approved a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Original TIF Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-43 (Headwaters Villa Project) (the "TIF District") located within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081, and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive and as amended (collectively, the "Act"), and on February 14, 2022, the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") approved the establishment of the TIF District; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2022 and June 8, 2022, respectively, the City and the Authority approved a modification to the Original TIF Plan (the "2022 Modification"), which amended the budget for the TIF District; WHEREAS, the City and Authority have determined a need to further modify the Original TIF Plan in order to reduce the geographic area of the TIF District due to replatting of a portion of the property within the TIF District as further described in this resolution; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.175, subd. 4(b) of the Act, a tax increment financing plan may be modified without public hearing or the findings required to be made for the original tax increment financing plan if the only modification is elimination of parcels from the project or district and the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated from the district equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the district's original net tax capacity; and WHEREAS, the City desires by this resolution to approve a modification to the TIF Plan (the "2024 Modification") the parcel previously identified as Outlot A, Country Club Manor Third Addition, Wright County (the "Removed Parcel'), is hereby removed from the TIF District. The new legal description of the TIF District will be as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the 2024 Modification is consistent with the redevelopment plan for the Redevelopment Project; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota as follows: 1. Subject to approval by the Authority, the 2024 Modification as detailed in this resolution is hereby approved. 2. City staff is authorized and directed to notify the Wright County auditor of the reduction of the size of the TIF District pursuant to Section 469.175, subd. 4(e) of the Act. DATED: June 24, 2024 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk MN190\163\958595.v1 2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The real property in the City of Monticello, Wright County, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lots 1-21, Block 1, Country Club Manor Third Addition Lot 1-11, Block 2, Country Club Manor Third Addition Lot 1-11, Block 3, Country Club Manor Third Addition Lots 1-21, Block 4, Country Club Manor Third Addition Outlot B, Country Club Manor Third Addition Outlot C, Country Club Manor Third Addition MN190\163\958595.v1 MA, -4-j _U L 4-J 0 M c� N TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 EXHIBIT V Boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 within Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 TIF District is inclusive of parcels within the TIF District and the adjacent roads and right of way a N p II Z G< - C y, ,p a 5 v Y DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 15 City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2H. Consideration of approving the engagement of ippi Creative for City communication efforts including the 2024 local option sales tax initiative and other as -needed communication priorities Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Community Development Director 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Finance Director City Clerk ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the engagement of ippi Creative for City communication efforts including the 2024 local option sales tax initiative and other as -needed communication priorities. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City has a broad platform of communication tools used to inform and connect with the public. While current staff are completing basic and necessary communication responses, communication services are needed in the interim while hiring and onboarding of a Communications Specialist occurs. In addition, staff proposes to engage a consulting firm to develop a coordinated communication plan for priority projects including the local option sales tax. As a professional service, the City can directly request proposals from qualified firms. Staff reached out to ippi Creative, a local firm with existing knowledge of the City's priority projects, including the local sales tax question, continuing Downtown revitalization work, and numerous transportation and public works projects. ippi Creative submitted a proposal in the amount of $6,500 to assist the City with two primary communication objectives. The first is the preparation of a communication plan for the Monticello local option sales tax initiative. The communication plan will outline a strategy and timeline for deployment of information on the tax proposal. The plan will allow the City to determine which communication elements staff can execute and which will require additional consulting services. This component also includes the preparation of a direct mail piece to be sent to all Monticello residents later this year. The second proposal component is communication on Downtown revitalization efforts. Much effort has gone into the recent and ongoing improvements in Downtown and the goal of this communication objective is to both inform our residents of the reasons why investment is occurring Downtown and to attract our residents into the area. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 In addition to these two core projects, the ippi Creative proposal includes the option for the City to engage the firm in additional as -needed communication projects at either an hourly rate, or on a project -specific basis. The identification of these as -needed services will allow City staff to direct additional communication work in concert with either the sale tax or Downtown efforts, as well as other communication items requiring more focused and immediate attention. While, in the purchase policy, Council authorizes department directors to approve purchases between $2,500 and $9,999 without formal Council action, this item is being presented for consideration for two reasons. First, the sales tax and Downtown communication initiatives are time -sensitive and, given the time to educate other firms on the details of the initiatives and for them to provide a quote for these services, staff (the City Administrator, Community Development Director, and Finance Director) only solicited one quote. Additionally, Joni Pawelk, the proprietor of ippi Creative, is the spouse of the City's Parks & Recreation Director. Therefore, staff felt it best for transparency to have Council approve the contract. I. Budget Impact: The budget impact for the proposed services is expected to be an initial $6,500 for the two primary project components, with additional expenditures as directed by the City Administrator. Funding for these services will come from the Administration department in the General Fund. The anticipated budget from the vacancy in the Communications Specialist position will be repurposed for this consulting work. II. Staff Workload Impact: The proposal will support existing staff in managing the workload associated with maintaining the current level of City communications, as well as supplement efforts for the sales tax and Downtown projects. Use of consulting services will reduce existing staff time on these efforts. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Monticello 2040 Plan is centered on the community's adopted Vision. The Vision states that Monticello "fosters a sense of belonging and connection." The City is a contributor to this sense of belonging and connection, using its communication platforms to engage and inform residents and stakeholders on public initiatives and projects. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends engagement of ippi Creative for City communication efforts to include priority projects and as -needed communication services. SUPPORTING DATA 0 ippi Creative Proposal ins Proposal for City of Monticello June 17, 2024 Submitted by Joni Pawelk 612.644.9886 3matf�� Joni@ippicreative.com Communications Proposal for City of Monticello iskground The City of Monticello is a growing community conveniently located on Interstate 94 and the Mississippi River. Residential and commercial growth throughout the region present opportunities for Monticello to intentionally and responsibly plan for the future while fostering the charming characteristics the community is known for. Strategic communications that inform, educate, and engage residents in the City's growth initiatives will increase participation and bolster long-term success. a Is Two specific projects, a local option sales tax proposal and downtown improvements, offer opportunities for the City of Monticello to partner with ippi Creative to strategically communicate with residents and increase dialogue about each project's purpose and community impact. ippi Creative will collaborate with the City of Monticello to: ✓ Share information and promote dialogue about the proposed sales tax option and associated projects to educate and inform residents prior to the general election ✓ Share information about downtown improvements to educate and inform residents of updates and promote engagement 0 iverables Sales Tax Project ippi Creative will work with the City of Monticello to: ✓ Develop a communications plan consisting of strategic communications/public relations tactics to educate and inform residents of the local sales tax option, associated projects, and community impact prior to the general election • The plan will outline: o Goals and objectives o Key messages o Key performance indicators o Target audiences o Communications, public relations, and/or promotional opportunities specific to the identified target audiences o Future potential • The communications plan can be deployed inhouse by the City of Monticello or in partnership with ippi Creative for an agreed upon cost per project ✓ Review current sales tax information pieces and provide recommendations to establish consistent messaging, photos, and design elements; increase effectiveness; and align pieces with the communications plan ✓ Design and create one direct mail piece incorporating key messages that educate and inform residents of the sales tax option and associated projects • Delivered as a print -ready PDF to be printed and distributed by the City Downtown Improvements Project ippi Creative will work with the City of Monticello to: ✓ Develop a communications plan consisting of communications/public relations/promotional tactics that create a narrative regarding downtown improvements that educates and informs residents while encouraging engagement The plan will outline: o Goals and objectives o Key messages o Key performance indicators o Target audiences o Communications, public relations, and/or promotional opportunities specific to the identified target audiences o Future potential ✓ The plan will include social media posts, e-news/blog posts, and newsletter articles to be designed and created by ippi Creative. Additional communication plan tactics can be deployed inhouse by the City of Monticello or in partnership with ippi Creative for an agreed upon cost per project Oestment ✓ Sales Tax Project: $3,000 Communications plan (mid -July— November 2024 campaign) Sales tax information review and recommendations • Direct mail design ✓ Downtown Improvements Project: $3,500 • Communications plan (4-month campaign) • Social media posts, e-news/blog posts, and newsletter article creation as identified in communications plan ✓ City to provide photos, existing informational/marketing/communications pieces, available communication channels/media, relevant background information ✓ Additional work can be directed for an agreed upon cost per project. Projects requested at an hourly rate will be billed at $105 per hour ✓ Total investment: $6,500 + costs for any agreed upon projects ✓ Investment schedule • A monthly invoice will be emailed to Angela Schumann at the City of Monticello (or as directed) • Payment can be made to: ippi Creative 11865 Baker Ave NW Monticello, MN 55362 0 nk you! Thank you for the opportunity to prepare and submit this proposal. The City of Monticello is an engaging community, and I would be honored to work with your team and support your growth initiatives. Please reach out with any questions! Joni Pawelk ippi Creative 612.644.9886 joni@ippicreative.com Signatures ippi Creative Signature Client Signature ippi Creative Contact (Printed Name) Client Contact (Printed Name) Date Date City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 21. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 827 amending the Monticello Citv Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.012 — Definitions, and 153.091— Use -Specific Standards related to Wrecker & Towing Services as a principal use including Definitions, Use -Specific Standards, and other regulations as necessary to define and limit the intent of application of the proposed amendment. Applicant: Citv of Monticello Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Stephen Grittman, Grittman Consulting, 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item City Planner Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City Clerk Community & Economic Development Coordinator ACTION REQUESTED Planning Commission recommends adoption of the proposed ordinance amendment. Motion to adopt Ordinance 827 amending the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.012 — Definitions, and 153.091— Use -Specific Standards related to Wrecker & Towing Services as a Principal Use including Definitions, Use - Specific Standards, and other regulations as necessary to define and limit the intent of application of the proposed amendment, based on findings in Resolution No. PC-2024-16. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: N/A PID #: N/A Planning Case Number: 2024-26 Request(s): Amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.012 — Definitions, and 153.091— Use -Specific Standards related to Wrecker & Towing Services as a Principal Use including Definitions, Use - Specific Standards, and other regulations as necessary to define and limit the intent of application of the Proposed Amendment Deadline for Decision: July 12, 2024 (60-day deadline) September 10, 2024 (120-day deadline) City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 Land Use Designation: N/A Zoning Designation: N/A Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: N/A Current Site Uses: N/A Project Description: In a companion application, a business owner (Bob's Towing) is seeking a Conditional Use Permit to continue operation of a Wrecker and Towing Services business. In reviewing the existing ordinance for the application, staff determined that amendments to the existing language of the Zoning Ordinance establishing the Use Standards applicable to Wrecker and Towing Services would further clarify the ordinance. ANALYSIS Wrecker and Towing Services are allowed as a Conditional Use in the B-3 (highway Business) District and as a Permitted Use 1-2 (Heavy Industrial) Zoning District. The zoning ordinance defines Wrecker and Towing Services as follows: WRECKER AND TOWING SERVICE. An establishment operated for the purpose of temporary storage onsite of no more than nine wrecked or inoperable vehicles for a period no longer than 90 days. If an establishment has ten or more inoperable vehicles located on -site, stores inoperable vehicles for more than 90 days, stacks vehicles top to bottom, or portions of the vehicles are dismantled or removed for sale, it shall be considered a junkyard. The proposed changes to the ordinance are largely related to the proximity and use aspects of the business. The changes regulate towing and towing -related activities separately from those more commonly associated with a salvage yard. Although the City does have a use classification for "Recycling & Salvage Center" the ordinance does not permit salvage yards which dismantle vehicles in any zoning district. Aspects of the current code are no longer applicable to this land use classification. "Wrecker Services" are subject to a specific set of requirements in the ordinance. The proposed changes to the standards are shown below. (18) Wrecker and Towing Services. (a) NE) PE)Ft49R of any salvage yard or junky-a-r-d chill be City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 (b a) All outside storage shall be enclosed by a sight -obscuring fence ofat lea up to eight feet in height. The fence and the materials used to construct it shall be approved of by the city. (c- b) No vehicles eF juRk shall be div-x .n+led-eF stored within the 100-year floodplain. (4 c) Upon receiving a motor vehicle which will not be repaired, the hatter„ shall he removed and the eRgiRe lubricant, tran7mic�cl�nt JiJJ. he drained int„ ,, ater+igh+ , red , ntainers and J1JJ. Inc r Gled OF disp sed Of aGGeFdiRg to all applisa lle fedeFal -and State lawsFules, and Fegelat+ens-. the applicant will take measures to ensure that no discharge of anv fluids from anv motor vehicle shall be permitted into or onto the ground. (e d) To FedueeReese, all No dismantling of motor vehicles shall be allowed. take place .d6IriRg timeframes deemed reasonable by the ri+., (f) Ne vehi a junk ahaII b&4/, ncnV.-A ^ Stered- vii h,A 200 foot f a RY +or h dy e r inl-.nrl wetland regaF dlecc Af ci;Ze (g) Ne veh+cues or junk ohall be st ro,- vVi+hip _30-0 foot- frr,m the nrnnarty lino ref aWy' ehheel,-rehu rch, la �,Mis the publie facility. (# e) No vehicles OF jWRk shall be Jifm. cntlPd-er stored within 300 feet of a well that serves as a public or private water supply unless such well serves the business. (i f) "Ne veh;elm, junk or portm 9f�itorna Ghall b-- wed +hcn 100 feat Af pFepertyIiR Towed vehicles shall be stored onlv in areas behind the front building line of the property, screened as required in this section. Towing equipment and vehicles may be parked in specificallv designated locations on an approved site plan. The proposed amended use standards are intended to reasonably utilize property for motor vehicle -related business as described in the B-3 purpose statement: (E) Highway Business District, B-3. The purpose of the "B-3" (highway business) district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. The amended use standards are also reasonable for Wrecker and Towing Services as permitted uses located within the 1-2 District. The limitations identified in the existing ordinance language appear to have been primarily focused on limiting the potential impacts of salvage yard operations, which as noted, are no longer allowed within the City. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 Towing businesses are compatible with other B-3 business uses, including specifically those in the immediate neighborhood of the proposed CUP in the companion application. With the amendments to the use standards as proposed, staff believes that the language better reflects the actual intent of the use classification and the districts in which the use may be allowed. Budget Impact: Costs for publication of the required notice and review and ordinance preparation by the City Planner are covered by the Planning & Zoning budget. II. Staff Workload Impact: The review and preparation of the report required approximately 7 hours of total staff time. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The proposed ordinance provides greater consistency with the City's 2040 land use objectives. The ordinance clarifies that automotive salvage yards are no longer allowable uses in the City and updates the ordinance to strike standards related to that prohibited use. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and held a public hearing on the item during its regular meeting on June 4, 2024. During their discussion, the Commission inquired as to why no minimum fence height was required in the proposed amendment. Staff indicated the language was written to allow the City the flexibility to determine the required fence height. There might also be a condition in which fencing would not be required, for example, if there were a dense landscaping screen. It was further noted that whether a CUP was required, or the use was permitted, the standards of the code will still apply. In the case of the permitted use, the user would propose their screening and fencing as part of site plan review. It was noted that the Business District allows fences up to 7 feet in height. This ordinance grants an allowance over that 7-foot code provision specific to this use. The Commission inquired whether existing towing services needed notification for the new code. Staff indicated that the amendment would not be retroactively applied; existing legally conforming uses would be grandfathered under the prior provisions. No public was present to address the Commission on the proposed amendment. Staff clarified that either a change in use review or site plan review as outlined by the ordinance would also be completed for the introduction of a new wrecker and towing use in any permitted use zoning district. Following discussion, the Commission recommends approval of the ordinance amendment unanimously. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance as proposed. The ordinance amendments are requested to better align the specific use standards applicable to towing services. SUPPORTING DATA A. Draft Ordinance 827 B. Resolution PC-2024-16 C. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts D. Monticello Official Zoning Map ORDINANCE NO. 827 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE XV, CHAPTER 153, MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTIONS 153.091 (F)(18) RELATED TO WRECKER AND TOWING SERVICES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. § 153.091(F) is hereby amended to read as follows: (18) Wrecker and Towinq services. or ju\7kyafd sh II be lecated ,.within 500 feet of aRy (b a) All outside storage iR sweh yards shall be enclosed by a sight -obscuring fence of at k-ast-up to eight feet in height_ which The fence and the materials used to construct it shall be approved of by the city. (E b) No vehicles elk shall be cl:rnuntlE?d er stored within the 100-year floodplain. (4 c) Upon receiving a motor vehicle which will not be repaired, the batter„ shall be remeved and the eRgiRe lubriccnt, tmn:xniti^n fllAid bFak fluid an,- eRgiRe ^olwnt 5hclj be dFaiRed int ,.watortight, zovered stain rs and Chill be r elect r disp s d Of ace FdiRg to all applicwbl-_ f^,A^r.,l -,nd state laws rules, and r „lati Rs. the applicant will take measures to ensure that no discharge of anv fluids from any motor vehicle shall be permitted into or onto the ground. (e d) Te Fed cCePefse, all No dismantling of motor vehicles shall be allowed. take plaGe (f) Nevehi or j:,nk shall er stored within ROO foot of aRy water hedy er iniand wetl-iRdi FegaFdlers of size (g) No vehi or junk Shall be stored thin 2nn feet from theproperty liRe f aRy schheel,-.church, publi" nlaygF„U Rd p blie park er cemetery er .within rdiRar„ View fr m the public facility. (# e) No vehicles e juR!( shall be di:rnantlE?d or stored within 300 feet of a well that serves as a public or private water supply unless such well serves the business. (j f) "rv^A WPh C-1CC, jLnk or per�9 ^f�,-vtrrhPr ocLlnc ahcll b_- ^v1Lr thcn 1 nn feet Af a lny p;9peFty 'iRe—Towed vehicles shall be stored onlv in areas behind the front building line of the property, screened as required in this section. Towing equipment and vehicles may be parked in specifically designated locations on an approved site plan. SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Chapter 153, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk AYES: NAYS: Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor IPA CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-16 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED WRECKER AND TOWING SERVICES AS A PRINCIPAL USE WHEREAS, the City of Monticello includes Wrecker and Towing Services as an allowed use in 6-3 and 1-2 zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the zoning regulations applicable to Wrecker and Towing Services include provisions relating primarily to salvage yards which is no longer an allowed land use in the City; and WHEREAS, the City finds that revision of the Code to specifically relate to Wrecker and Towing Services would better serve both the City and the affected businesses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4t", 2024 on the application and the applicant City of Monticello and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The zoning amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan by focusing the ordinance regulations the specific use of Wrecker and Towing Services rather than Salvage Yards. 2. The proposed amendment makes no other changes to the nature of uses that would otherwise exist in commercial or industrial districts. 3. The change in zoning language will accommodate reasonable and efficient operation of existing or new businesses. 4. The change in language will have no expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve commercial uses as expected. 5. The existing language of the code is outdated given the prohibition of Salvage Yards in the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITRESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the zoning amendment to modify the regulations applicable to Conditional Use Permits for Wrecker and Towing Services as defined in the proposed ordinance. ADOPTED this 4t" day of June, 2024, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-16 MONT ,1,LO P,NNING COMMISSION � t By: Pa nsor. Chair ATTEST: Angela Schum P, jomunity Development Director § 153.012 DEFINITIONS. WRECKER AND TOWING SERVICE. An establishment operated for the purpose of temporary storage onsite of no more than nine wrecked or inoperable vehicles for a period no longer than 90 days. If an establishment has ten or more inoperable vehicles located on -site, stores inoperable vehicles for more than 90 days, stacks vehicles top to bottom, or portions of the vehicles are dismantled or removed for sale, it shall be considered a junkyard. § 153.090 USE TABLE. Use Types "P" = Permitted "C" = Conditionally Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted Industrial Uses Wrecker and towing services TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements AO RA R1 R2 TN R3 R4 MH B1 B2 B3 B4 CCD PCD IBC 11 12 c. P I § 153.091(F)(17) § 153.091 USE -SPECIFIC STANDARDS. (F) Regulations for industrial uses. (18) Wrecker services. (a) No portion of any salvage yard or junkyard shall be located within 500 feet of any residence district. (b) All outside storage in such yards shall be enclosed by a sight -obscuring fence of at least eight feet in height, which fence and the materials used to construct it shall be approved of by the city. (c) No vehicles or junk shall be dismantled or stored within the 100-year floodplain. (d) Upon receiving a motor vehicle which will not be repaired, the battery shall be removed and the engine lubricant, transmission fluid, brake fluid and engine coolant shall be drained into watertight, covered containers and shall be recycled or disposed of according to all applicable federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. No discharge of any fluids from any motor vehicle shall be permitted into or onto the ground. (e) To reduce noise, all dismantling of motor vehicles shall take place during timeframes deemed reasonable by the city. (f) No vehicle or junk shall be dismantled or stored within 300 feet of any water body or inland wetland, regardless of size. (g) No vehicles or junk shall be stored within 300 feet from the property line of any school, church, public playground, public park or cemetery or within ordinary view from the public facility. (h) No vehicles or junk shall be dismantled or stored within 300 feet of a well that serves as a public or private water supply unless such well serves the business. (i) No vehicles, junk or parts of other items shall be stored closer than 100 feet of any property line. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2J. Consideration of approving a Conditional Use Permit for Wrecker and Towing Services as a principal use in the B-3, Highway Business District. Applicant: Nick Christenson o/b/o Bob's Towing Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Stephen Grittman, Grittman Consulting, 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item City Planner Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City Clerk Community & Economic Development Coordinator ACTION REQUESTED Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit for Wrecker and Towing Services as a Principal Use in the B-3, Highway Business District, based on the findings in said resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Address: 217 & 219 Sandberg Road Legal Description: A Portion of Lot 4, Block 2, Sandberg South PID #: 155-027-002040 Planning Case Number: 2024-23 Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for Wrecker and Towing Services as a Principal Use in the B-3, Highway Business District Deadline for Decision: July 7, 2024 (60-day deadline) September 5, 2024 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: RC, Regional Commercial Zoning Designation: B-3, Highway Business Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign District Current Site Uses: Wrecker and Towing Service, and Retail Sales (Two -Tenant Facility) City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 Surrounding Land Uses: North East: South West: Project Description: ANALYSIS Auto Body Repair —Major Plumbing Service Company Auto Body Repair —Major Vacant Commercial Land The applicant is seeking a Conditional Use Permit to continue operation of a Wrecker and Towing Services business. The applicant utilizes a portion of the existing building for office and dispatch purposes, and the rear portion of the site for temporary storage of towing equipment and vehicles pending transport to other locations. An existing Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development is in place for the property. The CUP for PUD authorized vehicle storage on site. Wrecker and Towing Services are listed as a Conditional Use in the B-3 District, the applicable zoning district for the subject property. The zoning ordinance defines Wrecker and Towing Services as follows: WRECKER AND TOWING SERVICE. An establishment operated for the purpose of temporary storage onsite of no more than nine wrecked or inoperable vehicles for a period no longer than 90 days. If an establishment has ten or more inoperable vehicles located on -site, stores inoperable vehicles for more than 90 days, stacks vehicles top to bottom, or portions of the vehicles are dismantled or removed for sale, it shall be considered a junkyard. The property in question received approval of prior Conditional Use Permits that allowed towing facilities in connection with both on -site and nearby auto repair facilities. However, the auto -repair services are no longer associated with this property. As this applicant operates the wrecker and towing services at this property as a separate business, the proposal formalizes the "Wrecker and Towing" CUP provisions for the current user. The applicant provided an illustration of the proposed site that shows an area generally behind the principal building as being used for the storage of towed vehicles and 4-5 tow vehicles. The area is enclosed by a solid fence that extends from the building's front corner and along the side and rear property lines. Parking for staff and clients is available in the front area of the property. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 The proposed CUP, with the provisions identified by the applicant's narrative, reasonably utilizes the site for motor vehicle -related business as described in the B-3 purpose statement: (E) Highway Business District, B-3. The purpose of the "13-3" (highway business) district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Approval of a conditional use permit application (including amendments) requires that the City find that conditions can be established to ensure that all the following criteria will always be met: (i) The conditional use will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Staff Comment: As an existing business, and consistency with the requirements of the ordinance (as amended) and with other applicable code standards, it is not expected that the CUP will result in any impact to property values. (ii) The conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working near the use. Staff Comment: The towing operation contributes to health and safety and is a common and important function. As it is located in an area of other similar businesses, there is no expectation that the use will have detrimental impacts. (iii) The conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property for permitted uses predominant in the area. Staff Comment: Existing development patterns are well established, and the CUP will not change the pattern or intensity of uses in the area. (iv) The conditional use will not pose an undue burden on public utilities or roads, and adequate sanitary facilities are provided. Staff Comment: The CUP will accommodate a use that is already operating in the area, and which is well served by existing infrastructure. (v) The conditional use can provide adequate parking and loading spaces, and all storage on the site can be done in conformance with City Code requirements. Staff Comment: The existing site supplies adequate on -site parking without the need for the parking spaces being converted by this project. Storage areas are behind the building and screen fence, as required by code regulations. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 (vi) The conditional use will not result in any nuisance including but not limited to odor, noise, or sight pollution. Staff Comment: With adherence to the required screening and location standards of the relevant codes, no nuisances are expected. (vii) The conditional use will not unnecessarily impact natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, and shorelines; and all erosion will be properly controlled. Staff Comment: No impacts to any natural features are expected with this project. (viii) The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined in the Zoning Ordinance for the proposed use. Staff Comment: The applicant's site plan and other materials indicate that the project will comply with relevant zoning requirements. Further, staff proposed a companion application to amend the zoning ordinance language to better reflect regulations specific to towing and towing -related activities. The proposed amendments to the "Wrecker Services" use standards are as follows.: (18) Wrecker and Towinq Services. cr jvnI(yer� :JhJ). k (b a) All outside storage in shall be enclosed by a sight -obscuring fence of at k-a&t-up to eight feet in height_ whiGh The fence and the materials used to construct it shall be approved of by the city. (e b) No vehicles or shall be &,m. z ntleder stored within the 100-year floodplain. (d c) Upon receiving a motor vehicle which will not be repaired, the batteFy shall he remeved and the „ „ lubFiCant, tranynic�^n fluid, bFak , fluid -,n,d eRgiRe eel--\nt fh A. he rdr orl intro w a t c r h+, Proid i ran+ sir orc Apd ®hall be FeG yGled er disposed ref aGGeFdiRg tO all appli-_ahlo fo,dP,r- .l -,n,d c+-,to laws rules, aR d regulations the applicant will take measures to ensure that no discharge of anv fluids from anv motor vehicle shall be permitted into or onto the ground. (e d) Te FeduEeReise, all No dismantling of motor vehicles shall be allowed. take plar=e GlirlN +/m Pfr am .r rlPe Prn. rl ro cr`P (,le by the city (ff) Ne vehi or junk a h a I I b e-&,m. cnt).-_H_ er ctrred- ; ii+hin 20Vl foot of aRy +or hedy r nl- nrl ..getland dlocc .,f ciao ,r aF City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 / s stored Within 300 feet frm the property line of a T No hieleTor junk chill b..e ., sehael, c urCfl, publis playground, p blie park a eemetery o within ordinary view fr.,m the p blie faGilit. (# e) No vehicles elk shall be di . zm lad -sr stored within 300 feet of a well that serves as a public or private water supply unless such well serves the business. (+ f) Ne vehforoc, junk or parts af�itomc chill be stered elesor than 190 feet of aRY property 14ne—Towed vehicles shall be stored only in areas behind the front building line of the property, screened as required in this section. Towing equipment and vehicles may be parked in specifically designated locations on an approved site plan. The towing business is compatible with other B-3 business uses, including specifically those in the immediate neighborhood of the proposed CUP. The proposed amendments to the ordinance would further support and define the requirements specific to wrecker and towing services. Budget Impact: The applicant submitted the required fees and escrows associated with the review and public notice for the applications. The escrow will be used to cover the review costs of consulting staff. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff involved with the review of the application include members of Development Services. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Monticello 2040 plan includes a policy to "Support existing businesses in their efforts to expand and do business in the community." The proposed CUP allows an existing business activity to continue forward as a separate principal business use at an existing location, distinct from its past allowance as an accessory use on the subject site. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and held a public hearing on the item during its regular meeting on June 4, 2024. During the public hearing, a letter of public comment was also entered into the record. Jay Morell, property owner of 1201 and 1209 Highway 25 South submitted a letter requesting the City require that all towing vehicles be parked on site. The Commission clarified that the public comment expressed concern over parking of towing vehicles on street. The Commission indicated that their concern would be that all towing vehicles associated with the activity needs to occur on the site with this CUP. The Commission also verified that the condition should then include both parking and storage of towing vehicles. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 Applicant Nick Christianson addressed the Commission and indicated that they do occasionally park vehicles on the street, rotating as needed. The Commission inquired whether there is enough space on site for operations. Mr. Christianson indicated that to get vehicles into the shop, some temporary on -street parking is used at times. It was noted that there is a condition that all parking must occur on site. Mr. Christianson indicated that there is adequate parking on site to manage operations. The Commission inquired as to whether a paved surface is required. Staff indicated that a paved surface is required by ordinance. Following discussion, the Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the CUP for Bob's Towing as proposed, with the conditions identified in the revised ordinance text, and summarized in Exhibit Z. The proposed use is consistent with prior use of the site for Auto Repair -Minor, and with uses generally anticipated in the B-3 (Highway Business) District. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2024-17 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Aerial Image Noting Vehicle Parking & Storage Locations Z. Conditions of Approval City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit for Wrecker and Towing Services as a Principal Use in the B-3, Highway Business District PI D: 155-027-002040 Legal: A Portion of Lot 4, Block 2, Sandberg South Address: 217 & 219 Sandberg Road, Monticello, MN 55362 1. Consistent with the City's definition, no more than nine inoperable towed vehicles may be stored on site at one time. 2. All outside storage in such yards shall be enclosed by a sight -obscuring fence of up to eight feet in height. The fence and the materials used to construct it shall be approved of by the city. 3. No vehicles shall be stored within the 100-year floodplain. 4. Upon receiving a motor vehicle which will not be repaired, the applicant will take measures to ensure that no discharge of any fluids from any motor vehicle shall be permitted into or onto the ground. 5. No dismantling of motor vehicles shall be allowed. 6. No vehicles shall be stored within 300 feet of a well that serves as a public or private water supply unless such well serves the business. 7. Towed vehicles shall be stored only in areas behind the front building line of the property, screened as required in this section. Towing equipment and vehicles may be parked in specifically designated locations on an approved site plan. 8. All employee parking is to occur on -site. 9. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-17 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WRECKER AND TOWING SERVICES BUSINESS A B-31 HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT PID 155-027-002040 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to amend an existing Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a Wrecker and Towing facility; and WHEREAS, the proposed Wrecker and Towing facility would continue the previous use consistent with the requirements of the prior approvals; and WHEREAS, the proposed use would have no other expected impacts on the site; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Highway Business (B-3), which allows such use as an accessory use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the use would continue to be consistent with the long-term land use plan for the City and the location, including the designation of the site for "Community Commercial" uses; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting that the proposed use facilitate long-term use of the site under revised zoning regulations as proposed separately; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting that the proposed use will comply with the terms and standards of the zoning ordinance with the recommendations approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4t", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the proposed facility will be in compliance with the standards for Wrecker and Towing Service facilities found in the zoning ordinance as proposed to be revised. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-17 2. The applicant has provided plans demonstrating that the use will improve long- term use of the site for the current and future facility. 3. The parcel is intended for commercial uses, which is the existing and proposed use of the property. 4. The operation of the business will not create noise, odors, visual impacts, or other noticeable impacts on the property or the neighborhood beyond those expected for allowed uses in the zoning district. 5. The use will improve convenience to customers and to the public, consistent with the City's economic development objectives for commercial property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE /T RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approve the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for electric vehicle charging facilities, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the Staff report, as listed below: 1. Consistent with the City's definition, no more than nine inoperable towed vehicles may be stored on site at one time. 2. All outside storage in such yards shall be enclosed by a sight -obscuring fence of up to eight feet in height. The fence and the materials used to construct it shall be approved of by the city. 3. No vehicles shall be stored within the 100-year floodplain. 4. Upon receiving a motor vehicle which will not be repaired, the applicant will take measures to ensure that no discharge of any fluids from any motor vehicle shall be permitted into or onto the ground. 5. No dismantling of motor vehicles shall be allowed. 6. No vehicles shall be stored within 300 feet of a well that serves as a public or private water supply unless such well serves the business. 7. Towed vehicles shall be stored only in areas behind the front building line of the property, screened as required in this section. Towing equipment and vehicles may be parked in specifically designated locations on an approved site plan. 8. All employee parking is to occur on -site. 9. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 41h day of June, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. W CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-17 MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION { 1 By: ul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schum n o munity Development Director Request for CUP for Wrecker & Towing Service as a Principal Use PI D:155027002040 Address: 217 & 219 Sandberg Road Legal: Portion of Lot 4, Block 2, Sandberg South Created by: City of Monticello Bob's Towing & Recovery Inc. 219 Sandberg Road Monticello, MN 55362 April 30, 2024 City of Monticello Land Use Application — Project Narrative The primary use for this property is to utilize the space for business operations. We utilize the front retail office as our dispatch center, break area, and meeting space. We utilize the buildings to store our trucks and to complete maintenance on our fleet. Our fleet consists of 9 trucks. During the day our fleet is being utilized throughout the area, at night, 4 trucks are kept at this location, inside our gate. From time to time, drivers will have down time and come back to the shop as their home base. The impound/storage lot is another aspect of the locations use. We are contacted by multiple law enforcement entities, such as the Wright County Sherriff's Office, Sherburne County Sherriff's Office, Minnesota State Patrol, Becker Police Department, Big Lake Police Department, and Metro Transit Police Department to respond to tow vehicles either involved in a crash or to impound the vehicle for various reasons. For this location, we have approximately 12-15 vehicles a month that come in and go out. The typical time a vehicle is in impound is 3 days, and for an accident 5 days. On occasion we are left with vehicles that are not picked up which we dispose of at 45 days, per state statute. A concern that may come up regarding vehicles that have crashed is leaking fluids. Most accidents, if fluids leak, leak at the scene of an accident or on the road from the accident scene to our lot. We utilize vehicle diapers, floor dry, siphon pumps, and other methods to mitigate any fluid spills as much as possible. We would categorize ourselves as in line with any other mechanic or body shop in the area. Overall, we have great relationships built with our neighbors in the area. As small businesses, we help each other out when needed and do our part to be good neighbors. I '.= 0 th I ell bjaqpues 2 E © TO Q6 0 V) WON, V City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2K. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 828 amending Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153 Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.091, Use -Specific Standards, as related to Dav Care Centers as a Principal Use in the Industrial & Business Campus (IBC) District. Applicant: Citv of Monticello Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Community Development Director 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: City Planner, Community & Economic City Clerk Development Coordinator ACTION REQUESTED Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the ordinance amendment. Motion to adopt Ordinance 828 amending Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153 Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.091, Use -Specific Standards, as related to Day Care Centers as a Principal Use in the Industrial & Business Campus (IBC) District, based on findings in Resolution 2024-23 REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description PID #: Planning Case Number: Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Uses: N/A N/A 2024-27 Consideration of a request for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance addressing Day Care standards as principal uses. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 ANALYSIS In early 2023, the City adopted a series of zoning ordinance amendments intended to make clerical corrections to the zoning ordinance and to address changing land use and development conditions. At about the same time, an application relating to a day care facility proposed on an I-1 zoned parcel was moving through the formal land use review process. Day care facilities were permitted uses in the Industrial Business Campus (IBC) District at the time of the land use application and continue to be permitted uses in within the current code. The day care facility was seeking rezoning to IBC as the zoning ordinance limits day care facilities in 1-1 Districts to secondary uses within principal use industrial buildings. The application for rezoning of the applicant's site to IBC was successful. In a clerical error that was likely intended to address the allowance for day care facilities in the IBC District based on the prior discussion, the larger zoning ordinance amendment was processed incorrectly. It included the addition of "IBC" within the section of the "day care center" regulations pertaining specifically to day care uses in 1-1, Light Industrial areas, which limits day care facilities as secondary uses within an industrial business. The intent of the City's past discussions and decisions on day care facilities was to specifically allow these as principal uses in Industrial Business Campus Districts. Staff requests that the City adopt an ordinance amendment consistent with this direction and correcting the error. With the change, the Use Table will continue to show day care centers as permitted uses in the IBC and the applicable regulations will allow day care facilities as a principal use subject to the principal use requirements of that section. Budget Impact: Limited to costs for publication of the notice and amendment, which will be allocated to the Planning & Zoning budget. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff impact is minor, with approximately 1 hour spent in preparation of the report and amendment. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The proposed corrective amendments to the zoning ordinance supports the City's Monticello 2040 objectives relating to providing employment opportunities and the services which support employees and employers, such as childcare. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and held a public hearing on the item during its regular meeting on June 4, 2024. No public was present to address the Commission on this amendment. The Commission had no questions or requested clarifications on this item. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 Following discussion, the Commission recommends approval of the corrective amendment. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends adoption of the proposed amendment. The proposed ordinance is consistent with the most recent direction of the City in regard to the ability to locate childcare facilities within Industrial Business Campus District. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC-2024-23 B. Ordinance 828, Draft C. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpt D. March 7, 2023 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-23 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE XV: LAND USAGE, CHAPTER 153 ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 153.091, USE -SPECIFIC STANDARDS, AS RELATED TO DAY CARE CENTERS AS A PRINCIPAL USE IN THE INDUSTRIAL & BUSINESS CAMPUS (IBC) DISTRICT WHEREAS, City staff has identified zoning ordinance language requiring amendment to correct an error in applicable use standards; and WHEREAS, City staff has proposed the amendment to the zoning ordinance intended to address the error and further conformity to the City's goals and policies as identified in the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Comprehensive Plan WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4, 2024 on the amendment and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The Zoning Ordinance amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering both the intent and the specific goals and policies for land use in the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendments eliminate concerns over imprecise language. 4. The proposed amendment is expected to have no negative impacts on municipal public services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE /T RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Zoning Ordinance amendment, based on the findings listed above. ADOPTED this 41" day of June, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. C-21 By: Pa nsor. ATTEST: Angela Schumann, m nity Development Director Angela SchumanVn,m Chair ORDINANCE NO. 828 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE XV, CHAPTER 153, MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTIONS 153.091 (C) FOR COMEMRCIAL DAY CARE REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. § 153.046(E) — Regulations for commercial uses is hereby amended as follows: (11) Day care center. (a) No overnight facilities shall be provided for children served by the daycare. Children must be delivered and removed from the facility daily. (b) An outdoor recreational facility: 1. Shall be appropriately separated from the parking lot and driving areas by a fence not less than four feet in height; 2. Shall be located continuous to the day-care facility; 3. Shall not be located in any yard abutting a major thoroughfare; 4. Shall not have an impervious surface for more than one-half of the playground area; 5. Shall extend at least 60 feet from the wall of the building or to an adjacent property line, whichever is less, or shall be bound on not more than two sides by parking and driving areas; and 6. Shall be a minimum size of 2,000 sq. ft., or in the alternative 75 sq. ft. per child at licensed capacity, whichever is the greater figure. (c) All state laws and statutes governing such use are strictly adhered to and all required operating permits are secured. (d) In addition to divisions (a) through (c) above, day care centers in the I -BC an I-1 district, —shall adhere to the following additional requirements: 1. Only be allowed as a secondary combination use which complements a primary business; 2. Only be conducted in the principal building, and not exceed 20% of the total principal building square footage; 3. Be physically separated from the other activities occurring in the principal building; 4. Not have a dedicated entrance (other than emergency exits) from the exterior of the principal building; 5. Not have dedicated off-street parking or signage. SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Chapter 153, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk AYES: NAYS: Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor 4 § 153.090 USE TABLE. (A) Explanation of use table structure. (1) Organization of Table 5-1. Table 5-1 organizes all principal uses by use classifications and use types (a) Use classifications. The use classifications are: agricultural uses; residential uses; civic and institutional uses; commercial uses; and industrial uses. The use classifications provide a systematic basis for assigning present and future land uses into broad general classifications (e.g., residential and commercial uses). The use classifications then organize land uses and activities into specific "use types" based on common functional, product, or physical characteristics, such as the type and amount of activity, the type of customers or residents, how goods or services are sold or delivered and site conditions. (b) Use types. The specific use types identify the specific uses that are considered to fall within characteristics identified in the use classifications. For example; detached dwellings, parks and recreational areas, and schools are "use types" in the Single-family Residence District. (2) Symbols used in Table 5-1. (a) Permitted Uses = P. A "P" indicates that a use is permitted by right, subject to compliance with all other applicable provisions of this chapter. Uses may be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "additional requirements" column. (b) Conditionally Permitted Uses = C. A "C" indicates that a use is permitted provided the city can establish conditions necessary to ensure the use is compatible to the proposed location and surrounding properties. Inability of the city to establish conditions to adequately control anticipated impacts is justification for denial of a conditionally permitted use. Conditional uses may also be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "additional requirements" column. (c) Interim Permitted Uses = 1. An "I" indicates that a use maybe permitted for a brief period of time provided certain conditions are met, and a specific event or date can be established for discontinuance of the use. Inability of the city to establish conditions to adequately control anticipated impacts is justification for denial of an interim permitted use. Interim permitted uses may also be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "additional requirements" column. (d) Prohibited Uses = Shaded cells.A shaded cell indicates that the listed use is prohibited in the respective base zoning district. (e) Uses not provided for within zoning districts. In any zoning district, whenever a proposed use is neither specifically allowed nor denied, the use will be considered prohibited in which case an amendment to the ordinance text would be required to clarify if, where and how a proposed use could be established. Use Types "P" = Permitted "C» = Conditionally Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted Base Zoning Districts AO RA R1 R2 TN R3 R4 MH B1 B2 B3 B4 CCD Agricultural Uses Agriculture P P P P P P P P P P P P Agricultural P Sales Community P P P P P P P P P Gardens Stables C Residential Uses Attached Dwelling Types Duplex P C Townhouse C P Multiple- C P C C family Additional Requirements PCD IBC 11 12 See See Table Ordinance laa'r § 153.091(B) (1) § 153.091(B) (2) § 153.091(13) (3) § 153.091(B) (4) § 153.091(C) (1) § 153.091(C) (2)(a ) § 153.091(C) (2)(b ) § 153.091(C) (2)(c ) § 153.091(C) (2)(d ) Detached Dwelling P P P P P P Group residential P P P P P facility, single-family Group residential C C C facility, multi- family Mobile and manufactured C C C P C home park Civic and Institutional Uses Active park facilities P P P P P P P P P P P P (public) Use Types "P" = Permitted "C„ = Conditionally Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted 5- No. 1A TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Base Zoning Districts None § 153.091(C) (3) § 153.091(C) (3) § 153.091(C) (4) 111111111mmill =*- A R R T R R M B B B B C P I O A R1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 DC CD C 11 12 Additional Requirements TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements "P" = Permitted "C" = Conditionally I Permitted A R R R T R R M 8 B 8 B C C D P C D B 11 12 O A 1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 C `I" = Interim Permitted Civic and Institutional Uses Active park § 153.091(D) facilities P P P P P P P (1) (private) Assisted living C P C C P § 153.091(D) facilities (2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C § 153.091(D) (3) Clinics/medic C P P C None al services Essential P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None services Hospitals C P P C § 153.091(D) (4) Nursing/ § 153.091(D) convalescent C C C C C C C C C C P (5) home Passenger C C C C None terminal Passive parks See See and open P P P P P P P P P P P P Table Ordinance P P P space 5- 1A No. Place of public C C C C C P C assembly Public buildings or C C C C C C C P C C P P uses Public warehousing I temporary Schools, K-12 C C C C C Schools, higher education Utilities C (major) Use Types "P" = Permitted „C„= Conditionally Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Base Zoning Districts § 153.091(D) (6) C P P § 153.091(D) (7) I I § 153.091(D) (8) C I I § 153.091(D) (9) C C C § 153.091(D) (10) Additional Requirements A R R T R R M B B B B C P I O A R1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 C C C 11 12 TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts "P" = Permitted „C„= Conditionally Permitted A R R R T R R M B B B B CCD PCD O A 1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses Adult uses Auction house Auto repair - C C minor Automotive P C wash facilities Bed and C C C C C breakfasts Brew pub P P Business support P P services Commercial P P lodging See Commercial Table See self -storage C 5- 1A Ordinance No. Communicatio ns/ P broadcasting Convenience C P P P retail Additional Requirements I B 11 12 C P P § 153.046(T) C § 153.091(E) (2) P P § 153.091(E) (3) § 153.091(E) (4) § 153.091(E) (5) § 153.091(E) (6) P P P None P § 153.091(E) (7) C § 153.091(F) (3) P P P § 153.091(E) (8) § 153.091(E) (9) § 153.091(E) Country club C Day care centers Entertainment/ recreation, indoor commercial Entertainment/ recreation, C outdoor commercial Use Types "P" = Permitted "C„ = Conditionally Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted Use Types "P" = Permitted „C„= Conditionally C C C P C C TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Base Zoning Districts (10) P C § 153.091(E) (11) C C C § 153.091(E) (12) C P A R R T R R M B B B B I R1 C C 11 12 O A 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 C D D TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Base Zoning Districts Permitted A R R R T R R M B B B B O A 1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses Animal kennel/boarding C (commercial) Event center Financial institution Funeral services Landscaping/ nursery P business Offices, commercial and professional services Personal services Production brewery or micro- distillery without taproom Production brewery or micro- distillery with taproom or cocktail room C C C C C P P P P P C P P P C C C § 153.091(E) (13) C P C C B 11 12 C D D See See Table Ordinance 5- 1A No. Additional Requirements Additional Requirements C § 153.091(E) (17) 153.091(E)14) § 153.091(E) (15) § 153.091(E) (16) § 153.091(E) (18) P P P § 153.091(E) (20) § 153.091(E) (22) P P § 153.091(F) (12) § 153.091(E) C C C (23) § 153.091(F) (13) Recreational vehicle camp site Repair establishment Restaurants Use Types "P" = Permitted "C„ = Conditionally Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted C C P P C P P TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Base Zoning Districts § 153.091(E) (24) P P § 153.091(E) (25) C § 153.091(E) (26) A R R T R R M B B B B C P I O A R1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 DC CD C 11 12 Additional Requirements TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements "P" = Permitted "C„ = Conditionally A R Permitted R R T R R M B B B B C C D I P C D B 11 12 O A 1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 C "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses Retail commercial uses (other) P P P § 153.091(E) buildings less (27) than 10,000 sq. ft. Retail commercial § 153.091(E) uses (other) C P P (27) buildings over 10,000 sq. ft. Retail service P P P § 153.048 Specialty eating C P P P § 153.091(E) establishment (28) s Vehicle fuel C C C See See § 153.091(E) sales Table Ordinance (29) Vehicle sales C 5- 1A No. § 153.091(E) and rental (30) Veterinary C § 153.091(E) facilities (rural) (31) Veterinary facilities C C C § 153.091(E) (neighborhoo (31) d) Wholesale P P P None sales Industrial Uses Auto repair - 153.091(F) major I I I I I I C I I P I P I§ Bulk fuel sales and storage C § 153.091(F) (2) Use Types "P" = Permitted „C„ = Conditionally Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted Use Types "P" = Permitted "C„ = Conditionally Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted Industrial Uses Contractor's yard, temporary Extraction of minerals General warehousing Heavy manufacturing Industrial services Industrial self - storage facilities Land reclamation Light manufacturing Machinery/tru ck repair and sales Recycling and salvage center Truck or freight terminal Waste disposal and incineration Wrecker and towing services TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Base Zoning Districts A R R T R R M B B B B C P I O A R1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 DC CD C 11 12 TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Base Zoning Districts A R R R T R R M B B B B CCD PCD O A 1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 B 11 12 C Additional Requirements Additional Requirements § 153.091(F) (4) I I § 153.091(F) (5) C P P § 153.091(F) (6) C § 153.091(F) (7) C P None C C § 153.091(F) (8) C C C C C C C C C C C C See See C C C § 153.091(F) Table Ordinance (9) 5-1A No. §153.091(F) P P P (10) C § 153.091(F) (11) C § 153.091(F) (14) C § 153.091(F) (15) C § 153.091(F) (16) C P § 153.091(F) (17) TABLE 5-1A: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) USES SUB -AREA Riverfront (A) I Broadway (B) I Cedar Walnut & I Pine (D) I GCCDal I Notes Retail, Office, Entertainment Retail, supported large Housing, and open supported b supp y by space supported Use Types space, entertainment; housing retail by limited supported by housing 2nd and users, retail and retail services and retail services service TABLE 5-1A: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) USES SUB -AREA Riverfront (A) Broadway (B) walnut & pine (D) General Notes Cedar (C) CCD Retail, Office, Entertainment Retail supported large Housing, and open su orted b b space supported Use Types space, entertainment, housing retail by limited supported by housing 2nd and users, retail and retail and retail services services service Additional use requirements applicable per § 153.091 Uses: Residential Uses Single- family P* CUP *Upper floors only Multi 3 du or under P* CUP* P *Upper floors only *Townhous es on Townhouse CUP CUP* CUP P Broadway east of Pine only Multi 4-12 du CUP CUP CUP CUP Multi 13+ du CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP *Allowed on ground floor for Ground floor CUP* P P townhouses on Broadway east of Pine Commercial Brew Pub <10,000 sq. ft. P P P P Brew Pub >10,000 sq. ft. CUP P CUP P Commercial Day Care CUP CUP P Commercial Lodging P CUP CUP P Uses: Commercial Entertainme nt/Recreation, <10,000 sq. Indoor Commercial (including CUP* CUP* CUP* CUP ft. only theaters) Entertainme nt/Recreation Outdoor Commercial Subject to § Event centers CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP 153.091(F) (14 ) Funeral services CUP Personal services P P P P CUP Places of public assembly CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Production brewery/ taproom P P P P Micro- distillery/ cocktail room Professional office - services and retail Commercial office Financial Restaurants, bars <10,000 sq. ft. Restaurants, bars > 10,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales <10,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales >10,000 sq. ft. Retail with service Specialty Eating Establishments <10,000 sq. ft. Vehicle fuel sales Veterinary facilities < 10,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses Industrial PUD Civic and Institutional Uses Clinics/ medical services Public buildings or uses (incl. public parks) Schools Pre- K-12 P P P P CUP* P P P CUP* - not P/CUP* on P/CUP* allowed on ground on ground ground floor floor floor P P P P P P P CUP P CUP P P P P P CUP CUP CUP P CUP P P P P P P P CUP CUP CUP CUP I I PUD Only CUP CUP P P CUP P CUP CUP CUP CUP TABLE 54B THE POINTES AT CEDAR DISTRICT (PCD) See § 153.048 9 7 P CUP CUP P CUP P CUP Upper floors preferred Upper floors preferred Drive thru by CUP CUP No outdoor uses PUD Only P CUP (Ord. 762, passed 8-23-2021; Ord. 780, passed 7-25-2022; Ord. 791, passed 11-14-2022; Ord. 797, passed 2-13-2023; Ord. 799, passed 2-27-2023; Ord. 804, passed 8-14-2023) street. 1. A hotel or motel shall have its principal frontage, access, and orientation direction on an arterial street or collector 2. Vehicular access from a local residential street is prohibited. 3. No more than one security or caretakers quarters may be provided on the site, and such quarters shall be integrated into the building's design. (b) In the CCD District, the following additional standards shall apply: 1. The principal building lot coverage is no less than 50% of the property, exclusive of easements devoted to public pedestrian use or other outdoor public spaces. 2. The building, site, and signage meet the standards for the "CCD" District. 3. The proposed use demonstrates compatibility and consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment entitled "Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan." (8) Communications/broadcasting. All communication antennas, antenna support structures and satellite dishes shall adhere to the applicable accessory use requirements for such outlined in § 153.092. (9) Convenience retail. In the B-1 zoning district, the following conditions shall apply: (a) The site is adequately served by a collector street. (b) Access point to the site shall be limited to a collector street. (c) Conformity with the surrounding neighborhood is maintained. (d) Adequate screening and landscaping from neighborhood residential districts is provided in accordance with this chapter. (e) Traffic generated by the proposed use does not exceed the capacity of surrounding streets and intersections to accommodate it. (f) The site shall conform to parking requirements as provided in this chapter. (g) Building setback from residential uses must be 30 feet or greater. (h) Parking lot setback from residential uses must be 15 feet or greater. (i) The site shall conform to signage requirements as recommended by the city. At no time shall the signage exceed the requirements as provided in this chapter. Q) The site shall conform to lighting requirements as provided in this chapter. The lighting shall be restricted to be consistent with the hours of operation, within one half hour of open and close times. (k) The hours of operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., except as may be approved by conditional use permit. (1) In addition to the above requirements, if in the CCD, the following conditions shall apply: 1. Building architecture shall be designed to reflect retail street -level architecture as defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and detailed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment entitled "Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan." 2. Site planning shall maximize building exposure to the street. 3. Drive -through facilities shall be located to minimize their exposure to the street. 4. Accessory structures, including canopies, menu boards, pay windows, and other structures supporting drive - through functions shall be constructed of materials to match those of the principal building. 5. Site planning shall be designed to emphasize connections to pedestrian facilities. (10) Country club. (a) The principal use, function, or activity is open, outdoor in character. (b) Not more than 5% of the land area of the site be covered by buildings or structures. (c) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with at least an aesthetic buffer Table 4-2, Buffer Type "B") in accordance with § 153.060(G). (d) The land area of the property containing such use or activity meets the minimum established for the districts. (11) Day care center. (a) No overnight facilities shall be provided for children served by the daycare. Children must be delivered and removed from the facility daily. (b) An outdoor recreational facility: 1. Shall be appropriately separated from the parking lot and driving areas by a fence not less than four feet in height; 2. Shall be located continuous to the day-care facility; 3. Shall not be located in any yard abutting a major thoroughfare; 4. Shall not have an impervious surface for more than one-half of the playground area; 5. Shall extend at least 60 feet from the wall of the building or to an adjacent property line, whichever is less, or shall be bound on not more than two sides by parking and driving areas; and 6. Shall be a minimum size of 2,000 sq. ft., or in the alternative 75 sq. ft. per child at licensed capacity, whichever is the greater figure. (c) All state laws and statutes governing such use are strictly adhered to and all required operating permits are secured. (d) In addition to divisions (a) through (c) above, day care centers in the IBC and 1-1 district, shall adhere to the following additional requirements: 1. Only be allowed as a secondary combination use which complements a primary business; 2. Only be conducted in the principal building, and not exceed 20% of the total principal building square footage; 3. Be physically separated from the other activities occurring in the principal building; 4. Not have a dedicated entrance (other than emergency exits) from the exterior of the principal building; 5. Not have dedicated off-street parking or signage. (12) Entertainment/recreation —indoor commercial. (a) No auctions shall take place on the premises. (b) Outdoor storage shall be prohibited. (c) Noise shall be controlled consistent with the standards of this chapter. (d) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "B") in accordance with § 153.060(G). (13) Entertainment/recreation — outdoor commercial. (a) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with at least a semi -opaque buffer fable 4-2, Buffer Type "C") in accordance with § 153.060(G). (b) Adequate measures to contain the proposed activity on the subject site shall be provided. (c) Dust and noise are controlled consistent with City Ordinance. (d) No auctions shall take place on the premises. (e) Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.. (f) All lighting shall be in compliance with §153.063. (14) Event centers. (a) Proximity to residential uses. Property upon which event centers are located shall not abut residentially zoned property, with the exception of R-3 and R-4 zoned properties. (b) Parking. Off-street parking for event centers shall be provided in accordance with §153.067. (c) Event size. Event centers shall be allowed a maximum event size as specified by the conditional use permit. (d) Number of events. 1. Event centers in the B-3 and B-4 District are not restricted in the number of events allowed unless restricted by the conditional use permit. 2. Event centers in the B-2 District maybe limited to certain days or number of events by the City Council per the conditional use permit. (e) Hours of operation. Event center hours of operation shall be as established by the City Council per the conditional use permit. (f) Noise regulations. Event centers shall be subject to the noise -related provisions of City Code. (g) Food regulations. Event centers may serve food and beverages as an accessory activity in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and city regulations. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, March 7, 2023 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, Eric Hagen, Melissa Robeck Commissioners Absent: Teri Lehner Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Hayden Stensgard, and Ron Hackenmuelier 1. General Business A. Call to Order Planning Commission Chair Paul Konsor called the regular meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. B. Consideration of aoorovine minutes a. Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes—February7.2023 ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 7, 2023 JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. b. Regular Meeting Minutes—February 7. 2023 ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 7, 2023 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. C. Citizen Comments None D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda None E. Consideration to approve agenda ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 7, 2023 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. 2. Public Hearings A. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Related to Retail Rental Uses Includine, but not Limited to Definition. Zoning Districts and Standards ADDliwnt: Michelle Rice City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. This item was brought forth after an inquiry from General Rental Center, an existing business in Monticello looking to expand operations into a new facility. It was found that retail uses specific to rental service was not included in the Zoning Code language. The requested text amendment would add language to include a rental aspect to the "retail commercial uses (other)" definition within the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Mr. Konsor asked if there are any additional, unforeseen items that would be allowed to be rented out with the proposed ordinance. Mr. Grittman clarified that the items currently allowed to be sold at a retail establishment by ordinance are the limitations to what can be rented. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler asked if Planned Unit Developments would be affected by this proposed ordinance. Mr. Grittman noted that it would depend on the language given to the specific Planned Unit Developments. If the PUD language included provision for "retail commercial uses (other)" or the base zoning district of the PUD allows "retail commercial uses (other)", it would then be permitted in the PUD. Councilmember Gabler asked if auto sales establishments within the city would be affected by the proposed ordinance. Mr. Grittman clarified that the auto sales establishments are classified as a separate use, and would not be affected by the proposed ordinance. Councilmember Gabler asked if staff and Planning Commissioners discussed amendments related to retail uses in 2022. Community Development Director Angela Schumann clarified that staff and Planning Commissioners did review potential amendments in 2022, and subsequently approved an ordinance amendment related to retail. The rental aspect of retail uses was not acknowledged at that time, nor at the time of adoption of the new code in 2011. Mr. Konsor opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. PAUL KONSOR MOVED, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2023-07 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. X FOR AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED TO RETAIL RENTAL USES, SECTION 153.012, DEFINITIONS, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Ms. Schumann noted the item was anticipated to be included in the City Council consent agenda at their regular meeting on March 271h, 2023. B. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello Lakes Planned Unit Develooment District affectine oarkinv. accessory buildines. lot coveraee. and related site imoacts. Aoolicant: Monticello Lakes. U.C. Mr. Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. Originally approved by the City Council in December of 2021, the amendment request was specifically related to the removal of the approved resident parking garages on site. The amendment also addressed a change in the configuration of the clubhouse on site as well. An updated landscape plan was also included in the proposed changes, due to the added greenspace on site following garage removal. Mr. Konsor opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2023-08 RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AMENDING THE APPROVED PLANS FOR SAID PUD, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION AND WITH CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN EXHIBIT Z OF THE STAFF REPORT OF MARCH 7, 2023. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Ms. Schumann noted the item was anticipated to be included in the City Council consent agenda at their regular meeting on March 131h, 2023. C. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan IComorehensive Plan). Chaoter 3. "Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation", re-euiding certain parcels from their existing Industrial designations to alternative Industrial. Emolovment. and Commercial categories, and amending the text of the Plan to add flexibility for imolementation of the Plan's goals and land use obiectives. Aoolicant: Citv of Monticello Mr. Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. This item arose from a discussion related to item 2D of the current agenda, where the subject site does not meet the current land use guidance and zoning for the applicant's proposed use. It was then understood that the properties east of Edmonson Avenue, north of Chelsea Road and south of Interstate 94, as well as properties in the vicinity along the eastern side of Fallon Avenue NE, had Comprehensive Plan land use designations that did not match the companion zoning districts respective to each property. The request was directly related to correcting what staff believed to have been an error during the drafting of the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. The amendments requested are to re -guide the land use designation for the properties listed within the staff report from General Industrial, to Light Industrial Park or Regional Commercial, depending on the sites' current zoning district. Eric Hagen asked why the parcel at 108 Thomas Circle was not being considered to be re -guided as Regional Commercial. Mr. Grittman clarified that the reason this property was proposed to change designation from General Industrial to Light Industrial Park was due the current zoning district of the property is 1-1, Light Industrial District, which is reflective of the Light Industrial Park designation. Andrew Tapper did not agree with some of the parcels listed to be re -guided, as he felt certain parcels reflected the General Industrial designation more so than the proposed Light Industrial Park designation. Mr. Grittman noted that the intent of Light Industrial Park zoning designation is in part to act as a buffer between General Industrial and Regional Commercial designations. Though the existing uses on those properties may not reflect the designation, it is anticipated that as uses change, those properties would become more conforming with their respective designations and the transitional area in which they are located. Ms. Schumann added that the properties in question had been historically zoned 1-1, Light Industrial, and the land use designations are established as a guide for future uses on a given site. Councilmember Gabler asked what the guidance of the location for the new Wiha Tools facility is anticipated to be. Ms. Schumann clarified that the existing zoning district for the site is Industrial Business Campus (IBC), and the property's land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan is Employment Campus. Councilmember Gabler noted that it is reasonable to re -guide the properties but questioned whether the Employment Campus designation would be more fitting than the proposed Light Industrial Park designation. Ms. Schumann had clarified that the reason staff proposed re -guidance to Light Industrial Park was directly related to the current zoning districts of the properties. The 1-1, Light Industrial zoning district directly correlates to Light Industrial Park designation within the Comprehensive Plan. Councilmember Gabler asked where General Industrial is currently designated within the City. Ms. Schumann noted that the Oakwood Industrial Park is still a designated area for General Industrial, and there are pages within Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan that break down land use designations by acreage. One reason for the limitation of General Industrial guidance within the 2040 Plan is the city's focus on job and tax base creation, which occurs more often at a higher rate or density in Light Industrial Park and Employment Campus designations. Councilmember Gabler asked whether if it is necessary to continue including the General Industrial designation in the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Schumann explained it is important to continue including General Industrial as a designation, due to the need for a designated location for business that flit the standards established by the designation in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Tapper reiterated that he did not necessarily see the need to re -guide certain parcels away from General Industrial if the current uses on site reflect that designation. Mr. Grittman noted that the main differences between light and heavy industrial users has to do with external impacts of the use on a given site. Ms. Schumann also noted that land use guidance is the broad land use plan, but the existing zoning of a property is what controls the property in terms of uses and standards. The parcels in question to be re -guided to Light Industrial Park are already zoned the corresponding 1-1, Light Industrial. Mr. Konsor noted a page within Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan that uses Polaris as an example of a General Industrial use. Ms. Schumann noted that it is more likely that use is Light Industrial in nature, although it would also be allowed in General Industrial areas. Mr. Hagen noted that even though Polaris is an example of General Industrial, the guidance of the land could be different, due to the Comprehensive Plan acting as a future plan for property within the City. Mr. Tapper raised the question of why there is separate guidance for Light Industrial Park and General Industrial, and why those two are not bunched in to one designation. Mr. Hagen noted the broadness of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, with guidance like Places to Work, Places to Shop, and Places to Live, then narrowing down of classification to what they are now provides a more established future plan for the City. The more detailed designation also provides potential businesses to easily understand where within the City their business would fit in with the long- term Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Konsor asked if all the parcels included in the discussion are currently zoned 1-1, Light Industrial. Ms. Schumann clarified that parcels proposed to be re - guided to Light Industrial Park are currently zoned 1-1, Light Industrial. The parcels proposed to be re -guided to Regional Commercial are currently zoned B- 4, Regional Business District. Ms. Schumann also noted that the detailed designations compared to designations in prior Comprehensive Plan is to address the fact that they also serve a purpose to promotes other sections and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Konsor opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Grittman reiterated that the amendments proposed include the changes to the Land Use Designation map in within Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan as well as a change the text within Chapter 3 to broaden the inclusivity of the Light Industrial Park designation to include both 1-1, Light Industrial, and IBC districts. Mr. Tapper asked if there is already a designation in the Comprehensive Plan that reflects the IBC zoning district already. Mr. Grittman clarified that the Employment Campus designation currently reflects the IBC zoning, but the intention of the text amendment proposed would be to include the IBC under the Light Industrial Park designation. Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Konsor noted that he was indifferent on the decision at hand Councilmember Gabler asked if there was ever a discussion of a business/industrial flex designation in the Comprehensive Plan, or if there is one already established. Ms. Schumann clarified that the flexibility within the current designations was discussed at the time of the Comprehensive Plan drafting, and that the intention was to include both commercial and industrial uses within the Employment Campus designation, but not to include those same commercial uses within any of the Industrial designations. Ms. Schumann added that if the Planning Commission was ever interested in looking at the Comprehensive Plan further, they have the authority to direct staff to prepare information on it and bring continue this discussion at a workshop meeting in the future. Mr. Tapper noted he understood the intention of he proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan following the discussion. Mr. Tapper was interested in the idea of bringing the discussion had to a subsequent workshop meeting to further discuss. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2023-09, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AND CATEGORIES REGUIDING CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIALTO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK, AND AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE PLAN TO ADD FLEXIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN'S GOALS AND LAND USE OBJECTIVES, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2023-10 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AND CATEGORIES REGUIDING CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO REGIONAL COMMERCIAL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN'S GOALS AND LAND USE OBJECTIVES, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Ms. Schumann mentioned this item would go forth to the City Council for final decision on March 27, 2023, and the City Council will be informed of the discussion on the item at the Planning Commission meeting. D. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan (Comprehensive Planl. Chaoter 3. "Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation" as related to Future Land Use Designations and Mao: Consideration of Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle from 1-1. Light Industrial District to Industrial Business Campus (IBC) District. AODlicant: Darrin Juve Mr. Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. The applicant sought rezoning of the parcel to accommodate the operation of a head start facility at 108 Thomas Circle. With the current zoning of the property being 1-1, Light Industrial, it limits the ability of a childcare use to a conditional use that must be accessory to a principal industrial use at the same location. The rezoning to IBC would allow them to operate in compliance, as a childcare facility use is permitted as a principal use in the IBC district. The concurrent request would be to amend the Comprehensive Plan so that the land use designation of the parcel would correspond with the proposed rezoning. Ms. Schumann noted that the prior item did not re -guide 108 Thomas Circle, so that it is necessary for the Planning Commission to act on the Comprehensive Plan amendment specific to this parcel. Staff also provided information related to the state of child care within Wright County to the Planning Commissioners for reference. This information has since been added to the agenda on the City of Monticello's website. Mr. Konsor opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Dean Williamson, of Frauenshuh Inc., on behalf of the applicant, addressed the Planning Commission and the public, noting they were in attendance if any questions arose. Councilmember Gabler asked for clarification on how the group seeking to occupy the building would be considered a childcare facility under the Zoning Ordinance language, rather than a school. Mr. Grittman clarified that the Monticello Zoning Ordinance defines schools as K-12 programs, under the current language of the code, preschools and other head start programs are defined as childcare facilities. Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Ms. Schumann noted that the decision for amending the Comprehensive Plan related to this agenda item does not include what designation to re -guide this parcel to. Staff recommended a re -guidance to Light Industrial Park. With the prior item being recommended for approval, it would then correspond with the rezoning request to IBC. ANDREW TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2023-11 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN), CHAPTER 3, "LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION" AS RELATED TO THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND MAP, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2023-12 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. X, REZONING 108 THOMAS CIRCLE FROM 1-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS (IBC), BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Ms. Schumann mentioned this item would move forward to the City Council for final decision on March 27. 2023. Before the Planning Commission proceeded to the regular agenda to discuss whether the Comprehensive Plan item on the agenda should be further discussed at a workshop meeting in the future. The consensus was to plan for a workshop in the future. 3. Reeular Aeenda A. Consideration of Communitv Development Director's Report Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator Ron Hackenmueller addressed the Planning Commission regarding a personnel change within the Building Department. Building Inspector Bob Ferguson steeped into a new position as Building Official/Fire Inspector to assist with the restarting of the fire inspection program. The Building Department is also adding a third building inspector to the department following the personnel change noted. 4. Added Items None S. Adjournment MELISSA ROBECK MOVED TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:50 P.M. Recorded By: Hayden Stensgards Date Approved: April 4, 2023 ATTEST: Ang4Schuamunity Development Director City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2L. Consideration of approving a Preliminary & Final Plat of Cedar Street Storage; Revocation of an Existing Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development; approving a Development & Final Stage Planned Unit Development; and adopting Ordinance 829, Rezoning to Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Bruce Stainbrook o LbJo Stora eg Link Prepared by: Meeting Date: Stephen Grittman, Grittman Consulting, 6/24/2024 City Planner Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City Clerk Community & Economic Development Coordinator, Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator, Assistant City Engineer ACTION REQUESTED ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of each of the four decisions. Decision 1: Preliminary and Final Plat and Development Contract Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-53 approving a Preliminary & Final Plat and Development Contract for Cedar Street Storage subject to the Conditions in Exhibit Z as modified by the Planning Commission and approval of proposed rear area surfacing material by the City Council. Decision 2: Development & Final Stage PUD Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-54 approving a Development & Final Stage Planned Unit Development subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z as modified by the Planning Commission and approval of proposed rear area surfacing material by the City Council. Decision 3: Rezoning to Planned Unit Development Motion to adopt Ordinance 829 for Rezoning to Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development. Decision 4: Revocation of Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-55 revoking an Existing Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, subject to the condition that the property is rezoned to Cedar Street City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 Storage PUD District, and the Final PUD and Final Plat for Cedar Street Storage are approved and recorded, along with any required development agreements or other documents. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Address: 36 Dundas Road Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 2, AMAX Addition and Lengthy Legal Descriptions —Contact City Hall PID #: 155-213-002010, 155-500-142305, 155-500- 142304 Planning Case Number: 2024-21 Request(s): 1. Preliminary & Final Plat of Cedar Street Storage; 2. Revocation of an Existing Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development; 3. Development & Final Stage Planned Unit Development; 4. Rezoning to Planned Unit Development. Deadline for Decision: July 1, 2024 (60-day deadline) August 30, 2024 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: Commercial and Residential Flex Zoning Designation: Pointes at Cedar District (Sub -District Tilia) Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Commercial Self -Storage by CUP for PUD Surrounding Land Uses: North: Vacant Pointes at Cedar District East: Pointes at Cedar Park/Open Space South: Pointes at Cedar Park/Open Space West: B-3 Commercial Project Description: The applicants seek updated PUD approvals to remove existing temporary storage pods, which exist under an expiring Interim Use Permit, and replace those temporary units with permanent self -storage as an expansion of the existing Commercial Self - Storage Use. The project requires a replat, replacement of the old CUP for PUD with a revision to the Pointes at Cedar District and rezoning to PUD, and Development and Final Stage PUD approvals under the revised PUD zoning district. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 ANALYSIS Rezoning to PUD — Cedar Street Storage PUD District The subject property is a Commercial Self -Storage facility, authorized under a prior Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development (PUD) and several subsequent amendments. The site is currently occupied by a series of individual commercial self -storage buildings (7 total), as well as a series of individual portable storage pods that were placed along the south boundary of the property by Interim Use Permit. The IUP for the storage pods was issued nearly ten years ago, with a ten-year time limit which is set to expire on June 9, 2024. The terms of the IUP are that upon expiration, the storage pods must be removed. That IUP was issued as an amendment to the original Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development under a B-3, Highway Business zoning designation. The IUP proposal was brought forward as a way of using the southerly portion of the property, with the potential for future property acquisition to expand the storage business with permanent buildings. After the IUP's issuance, the City created the Pointes at Cedar land use concept and Zoning District, rezoning the subject property to the Pointes at Cedar District, its current designation. As a part of the Pointes at Cedar planning, the City negotiated to purchase the adjacent surrounding property and planned for public use of the areas adjoining the self -storage business property, foreclosing the acquisition of additional expansion land. Commercial self -storage is not an allowed land use in the Pointes at Cedar District. Moreover, the Pointes at Cedar zoning district anticipates a process separate from other zoning designations in that it discourages the use of PUD zoning, providing instead a more comprehensive set of development objectives and district standards. Although the Pointes at Cedar discourages the use of PUD, staff is recommending the rezoning to PUD to establish a clear set of regulations for this existing use that are in closer alignment with The Pointes at Cedar District. This is preferred instead of continuing under the prior series of amended Conditional Use Permits for Planned Unit Development. This requires rezoning the site to a new PUD district and concurrently retiring the old CUP/PUD. Although no longer zoned Pointes at Cedar District (PCD), the PUD City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 ordinance proposed will apply the standards of the PCD to this project, recognizing the existing use and site development. The rezoning is not necessary to continue the current business operation. It exists as a legal non -conforming use in the Pointes at Cedar District, which also shows the current use in the Pointes' site plan elements. As a legal nonconformity, it is permitted to continue to its current extent, including the right to maintain, remodel, and reconstruct existing buildings and uses on the property, but without expansion. The rezoning is intended to facilitate the expansion of the permanent buildings on the site. With the IUP expiring, and opportunities for land acquisition no longer available, the self - storage property owner is seeking a way to continue the intensification of storage use on the southerly portion of the property. The proposal would add an additional permanent storage building along the south property line, generally in the location of the current storage pods. As detailed in the applicant's site planning and other documents, to accommodate the expansion as proposed, the new buildings would be placed on or near the south property line with little or no setback. Development and Final Stage PUD The Development Stage PUD consists of a site and building plan showing the proposed location of the additional southerly building. The building would generally follow the south property line, a total of 310 feet in length, stepping the rear wall of the building in 5-foot increments of depth (from 15 feet deep on the east to 25 feet deep on the west). The interior drive -aisle width is approximately 20 feet in width. Access to the individual units would be only from the interior side. The applicants indicate that they would finish the exterior wall of the building with a stucco finish facing the outward (south) wall portion. Images illustrating the proposed finish were provided. While the stepping of the building is a positive in terms of breaking up the visual line of the expanse of the south wall, the staggered nature of the building creates a series of small pockets of property which would not be accessible to the property owners for maintenance, since the corners of each "stagger -point" would touch the property line. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 11 ••� '•• l EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING r I! p INLET PROTECTION 1116!AAA IXISTIN 97183. `-- — 20.0�' ' 982M .. '962.56 963.00.. — — — — 971M 90• + 150' — .983.00 •983.50 _ _ °83 50 .. . ' I PROPOSED BUILDING'A' eo 70 971.83 25 911.83 AREA v 6,300 SF 971.83 962.50982.50 _ 1 983.00 1pll 971.83 971.83^ d>/ 963.00 _ SILT SOCK 993.50 963.50 rr Concerns about trash accumulation, weed growth, or other maintenance issues would raise long-term issues in this area. The City's plans for the Pointes at Cedar include the area directly south of this property line to be used as the primary access point to the public spaces of the Pointes area. Landscape screening, and likely maintenance of these pocket areas, would fall to the City as a part of its development of the Pointes at Cedar project. The maintenance options for these areas should be resolved if the plan proceeds. Because the design of the building and the zero -lot -line configuration create these areas of inaccessible property, it is unclear how these areas would be maintained. The applicant clarified during the Planning Commission meeting that it is their intention to provide concrete surfacing behind the buildings to minimize maintenance issues. The condition of approval has been modified to allow Council to approval this surfacing material in satisfaction of that condition. The applicants suggest in their narrative that the buildings will be covered by a stucco finish exterior similar to that used on the external walls of their Chelsea property to the west. No additional screen wall extends beyond the extent of the building length. The site would otherwise continue to be visible from the Pointes area on the south and east sides of the property, leaving the remainder of any desired screening and landscaping to the City. When considering PUD development, the Zoning Ordinance requires that the flexibility granted under a PUD project from standard zoning regulations is justified by additional amenities or development qualities that would not otherwise be likely to be included. The flexibility requested for this PUD is both the additional building on a single lot (or across existing lot lines if left unplatted), as well as a significant accommodation to building setback along the south boundary of the site. The applicants suggest that the PUD enhancement is the additional solid screening that the new building would provide for views of the westerly two-thirds of the site's storage buildings. Without the construction of this new unit, upon removal of the storage pods, the entire south line of the building and door accesses of the existing permanent buildings will be fully visible unless a new building is constructed. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 If the plan is to be considered for PUD approval, additional screening and architectural treatment would be required conditions of the project. There is some room along the south boundary area, east of the proposed building, to add landscape screening, or additional wall screening, or both. In addition, adding a screen wall to the east side of the existing property would help buffer the views of the existing site from the future public spaces in the Pointes open spaces. There is currently no additional landscaping included with the application. Landscaping elements consistent with The Pointes at Cedar's central biome are recommended. Following discussion, the Planning Commission determined that concrete surfacing would be suitable in the "pocket" areas behind the proposed building. The Commission also recommended that no screening wall be installed on the easterly side of the site, in recognition that future development at The Pointes in this area is uncertain at this time, and that the easterly buildings are an existing condition unchanged by this application. The Commission did recommend that the applicant install additional landscaping in the open southeasterly portion of the site. The Conditions in Exhibit Z are updated to reflect the Planning Commission's recommendations. Revocation of prior Conditional Use Permit for PUD The rezoning to PUD, if adopted, is intended to replace the prior CUP/PUD. The Interim Use Permit for the temporary storage pods will expire under either the existing or new zoning. With the adoption of a new PUD zoning district, revocation of the prior CUP/PUD would be an appropriate companion action. Preliminary and Final Plat The existing site consists of three separate development parcels. A portion of the property is currently unplatted. In the current site configuration, existing buildings cross property lines City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 The proposed plat will resolve both conditions, platting all property and eliminating the problematic lot and building configuration. The proposed plat would combine the parcels into a single PUD zoning parcel and formally dedicate the balance of right of way for Dundas Road. Dundas Road is currently an easement across the easterly portion of the site, rather than dedicated as right of way. The PUD zoning accommodates the multiple building layout on the single parcel. The primary change from typical plat requirements is that the perimeter lot line drainage and utility easement that would normally be required along the south boundary line would be shifted to a location internal to the site, since a building would occupy what would normally be the location of that easement. The City Engineer recommended an internal drainage and utility easement along the access drive aisle to accommodate typical easement needs in place of the customary lot line easement. The platting process will also require the vacation of existing easements to combine the parcels as shown, with easements to be reestablished as required by the City Engineer with the plat. No access modifications or changes to public utilities are required with this plat. The City Engineer provided a separate comment letter on the plat, as well as related grading and drainage concerns. I. Budget Impact: The applicant submitted the required fees and escrows associated with the review and public notice for the applications. The escrow will be used to cover the review costs of consulting staff. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff involved with the review of the application include members of Development Services. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: While the commercial self -storage use is no longer conforming to the goals of the Monticello 2040 plan as established in the Small Area Plan for The Pointes, the 2040 Plan includes policies allowing "reinvestment activities that enhance conditions in existing commercial centers and corridors" and to "Support existing businesses in their efforts to expand and do business in the community." Storage Link is proposing to eliminate a temporary condition in favor of site investment at their existing location. The additional building will enhance the southerly exposure of the site. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and held a public hearing on the series of requests during its regular meeting on June 4, 2024. The Commission confirmed that the interim use permit in place will expire and the storage containers would have to be removed. Staff confirmed. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 Staff noted that the revocation of the existing CUP would only be acted on if the first three items were to be approved. Otherwise, the CUP for PUD would remain in place. The Commission noted that if the storage units are removed and this set of requests are not approved to move forward, there would be no screening in place. Bruce Stainbrook and Byron Bjorklund, property owners, addressed the Commission. Mr. Bjorklund indicated that the concept meeting guided their planning. They noted their support of The Pointes at Cedar project throughout the planning process. They also noted their flexibility regarding the Dundas Road design discussion as it continues forward. The applicants indicated that they would install concrete in the pockets behind the building. From Cedar, they would be shielding a good portion of the property. Without knowing the adjacent use at The Pointes as it develops, it is difficult to determine appropriate screening on the south and east sides of the site. They indicated that the proposed building, with EFIS on the southerly fagade, will screen a portion of the existing buildings. The Commission inquired whether the applicant would be concerned about security for the southeast area when The Pointes is developed. The applicant indicated that they would likely construct a fence from the edge of this new building at that time. No other public was present to address the Commission on the item. The Commission indicated support for the concrete surfacing on the south side of the buildings to address the potential maintenance issues noted in those areas. The Commission reviewed the conditions of approval proposed and had significant discussion on what would be reasonable in terms of the site planning given the uncertainty of plans and timing for The Pointes in the future. The Commission noted the east side as an existing condition in terms of its appearance. The Commission indicated their support for consideration of a screening solution at the time of future development of The Pointes on the easterly side and modified the conditions accordingly. Following discussion, the Commission unanimously recommended approval of all decisions with modified conditions as noted in Exhibit Z. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION The rezoning and expansion of the current Commercial Self -Storage facility raises some land use policy consideration for the Pointes at Cedar District. While the addition of a permanent building along the southerly exposure, screening the existing storage buildings, the site would benefit from added landscaping. Staff recommends the PUD and related actions only with the conditions as required by the Planning Commission in their modified Exhibit Z. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 SUPPORTING DATA Resolution 2024-53 - Preliminary and Final Plat Resolution 2024-54 - Development and Final Stage PUD Resolution 2024-55 - Rezoning to PUD Resolution 2024-56 - Revocation of CUP for PUD Ordinance No. 829 Resolution PC-2024-18, Rezoning to Cedar Street Storage PUD District Resolution PC-2024-19, Development Stage PUD for Cedar Street Storage Resolution PC-2024-20, Preliminary Plat of Cedar Street Storage Resolution PC-2024-21, Revocation of CUP for PUD for the former AMAX Self Storage Draft Revocation of Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Proceedings Aerial Site Image Applicant Narrative Preliminary Plat of Cedar Street Storage Draft Final Plat of Cedar Street Storage Grading Plan Image of Exterior Wall Design of Proposed Building Proposed Storage Building Design Plan Set Trachte Building Systems Inc. Project Calculations Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator's Letter, Dated May 30, 2024 Development Contract Conditions of Approval City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD Plat of Cedar Street Storage and Cedar Street Storage PUD District The PUD is subject to submission of final stage site plans compliant with these conditions, with no outdoor storage allowed on site. 2. The applicants have identified the installation of concrete surfacing as a suitable maintenance process for the south side of the building and site area, subject to the approval of this material treatment the City Council. 3. The applicants supplement the request with a Landscape Plan that shows extensive screen plantings consistent with the Central biome of The Pointes at Cedar along the south boundary not occupied by the new building. The apIicant9 pr3v;c eg feF the east p eFty IiRe aFea, R the alteFRati l , the appiiGaRc-'; extei-l-the sere -en ��JmiICr to th. at u!;26I E)R the pIi ants' ChelseaRead site` from the bUildiRg to the east property line— Planning Commission recommended striking this condition given uncertainty in future development at The Pointes and noting that the easterly buildings are an existing condition. 4. The City approves vacation of easements that lie under existing or proposed building sites, with drainage and utility easements to be reestablished per the City Engineer's recommendations. 5. Compliance with the terms of the Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator's letter dated May 30, 2024. 6. Developer shall execute an Encroachment Agreement to the City for any facilities located within the drainage and utility areas located on the plat. 7. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer's Office, as applicable. 8. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-53 A RESOLUTION OF APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR CEDAR STREET STORAGE ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a preliminary and final plat of a parcel of currently developed land; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat would incorporate development opportunity an additional commercial self storage building as an allowed use in the proposed Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities; and WHEREAS, the platted parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the appropriate PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial Residential Flex uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary and final plat shows a single development parcel, upon which the existing and proposed buildings will be located, as well as other improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the plat pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4th, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-53 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed plat accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed plat accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 7. As a property which has been utilized for such uses for many years, the proposed plat is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the plat will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Monticello City Council approves the Preliminary and Final Plat for Cedar Street Storage, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: The PUD is subject to submission of final stage site plans compliant with these conditions, with no outdoor storage allowed on site. 2. The applicants have identified the installation of concrete surfacing as a suitable maintenance process for the south side of the building and site area, subject to the approval of this material treatment by the City Council. 3. The applicants supplement the request with a Landscape Plan that shows extensive screen plantings consistent with the Central biome of The Pointes at Cedar along the south boundary not occupied by the new building. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-53 4. The City approves vacation of easements that lie under existing or proposed building sites, with drainage and utility easements to be reestablished per the City Engineer's recommendations. 5. Compliance with the terms of the Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator's letter dated May 30, 2024. 6. Developer shall execute an Encroachment Agreement to the City for any facilities located within the drainage and utility areas located on the plat. 7. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer's Office, as applicable. 8. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that the document titled "Development Contract for Cedar Street Storage" with assignment of the specific terms and conditions for public improvements and the specific terms and conditions for plat development, is hereby approved. ADOPTED this 24th day of June 2024, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL By: Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-54 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT STAGE AND FINAL STAGE PUD FOR CEDAR STREET STORAGE WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development approval for an addition to a multiple building commercial self storage project; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD would consist of development existing and proposed commercial self storage buildings as an allowed use in the proposed Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to requests a preliminary plat for the proposed project, and an amendment to the City's PUD zoning ordinance and rezoning to Cedar Street Storage PUD District; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the adopted PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial Residential Flex uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Development and Final Stage PUD addresses all additional improvements serving the project, as well as site and architectural improvements on Lot 1 of the project and plat; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PUD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-54 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4t", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development for Cedar Street Storage PUD District; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the concurrent application for Development and Final Stage PUD; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments of the Planning Commission, the public, and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the approval for Development and Final Stage PUD: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 6. As a property which has been utilized for commercial self storage for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 7. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. C CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-54 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Monticello City Council approves the proposed Development Stage & Final Stage PUD for Cedar Street Storage Addition be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. The PUD is subject to submission of final stage site plans compliant with these conditions, with no outdoor storage allowed on site. 2. The applicants have identified the installation of concrete surfacing as a suitable maintenance process for the south side of the building and site area, subject to the approval of this material treatment by the City Council. 3. The applicants supplement the request with a Landscape Plan that shows extensive screen plantings consistent with the Central biome of The Pointes at Cedar along the south boundary not occupied by the new building. 4. The City approves vacation of easements that lie under existing or proposed building sites, with drainage and utility easements to be reestablished per the City Engineer's recommendations. 5. Compliance with the terms of the Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator's letter dated May 30, 2024. 6. Developer shall execute an Encroachment Agreement to the City for any facilities located within the drainage and utility areas located on the plat. 7. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer's Office as applicable. 8. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2024, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-55 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE CEDAR STREET STORAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO CEDAR STREET STORAGE PUD DISTRICT ALL THAT LAND TO BE PLATTED AS CEDAR STREET STORAGE WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Planned Unit Development for a commercial project, consisting of Commercial Self Storage, to be platted as Lot 1 of the concurrent request for the Cedar Street Storage Addition plat; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD District would create the uses and standards applicable to all development in the Cedar Street Storage District, to consist of a multiple -building commercial self storage facility as an allowed use in the proposed Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to requests for a preliminary and final plat for the proposed project, and a Development and Final Stage PUD approval for the Cedar Street Storage PUD District; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD and its associated plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the adopted Cedar Street Storage PUD District standards, as well as other applicable standards of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial and Residential Flex, currently zoned as the Pointes at Cedar District; and WHEREAS, the proposed Cedar Street Storage PUD District establishes standards and development regulations which are inconsistent with the current Pointes at Cedar Zoning District; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-55 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 41", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the establishment of the proposed district and rezoning the subject property to PUD for the Cedar Street Storage PUD District; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Planning Commission's recommendation and all of the comments and the staff report; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the approval: The proposed Zoning District is required to address the existing use, and provide the potential for expansion due to the intent and purpose of the plans, goals, and policies of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan related to the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, provided the development is adequately screened from the adjoining Pointes at Cedar area. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD District and the associated development plans accommodate additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed PUD does not interfere with reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. As a property which has been used for commercial self storage for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding properties or values. 7. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. 9 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-55 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Map as specified in Ordinance 829 are hereby approved and adopted. ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2024, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL IN ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ire CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-56 A RESOLUTION FOR REVOCATION OF A PREVIOUS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CEDAR STREET STORAGE ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a zoning amendment and development and final stage Planned Unit Development approval for an addition to a multiple building commercial self storage project; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD would consist of development existing and proposed commercial self storage buildings as an allowed use in the proposed Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to requests for a preliminary and final plat for the proposed project, and an amendment to the City's PUD zoning ordinance and rezoning to Cedar Street Storage PUD District; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD; and WHEREAS, the current CUP-PUD no longer accommodates the need for expansion, nor is it consistent with the future land uses around the property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PUD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies, and recommends the Cedar Street Storage PUD as replacement for the current CUP- PUD; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4t", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended revocation of the existing Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, to be replaced by the Cedar Street Storage PUD District; and it CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-56 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments of the Planning Commission, the public, and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the revocation of the : 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 6. As a property which has been utilized for commercial self storage for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 7. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the current Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Cedar Street Storage Addition be revoked, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property is rezoned to Cedar Street Storage PUD District, and the Final PUD and Final Plat for Cedar Street Storage are approved and recorded, along with any required development agreements or other documents. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-56 ADOPTED this 241h day of June, 2024 by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL la ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor 13 ORDINANCE NO. 829 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE XV, § 153.047 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ESTABLISHING THE CEDAR STORAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO CEDAR STREET STORAGE PUD: PLAT OF CEDAR STREET STORAGE ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section § 153.047, PUD Districts, is hereby amended to add the following: (W) Cedar Street Storage PUD District (1) Purpose. The purpose of the Cedar Street Storage PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the Planned Unit Development District for commercial self -storage land uses. (2) Phased Development. The Cedar Street Storage PUD District will be developed in a single phase. (3) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Cedar Street Storage PUD District shall be Commercial self -storage, as defined in the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, along with administrative offices, subject to the approved Final Stage PUD Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated and subject to the conditions of approval imposed by City Council Resolution No. , and as may be further amended. The introduction of any other use or change in density shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, 153.028(0)(9)(b) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD. (4) Accessory Uses. No other accessory uses shall be permitted in the Cedar Street Storage PUD District, nor shall any outdoor storage be allowed. (5) District performance standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Cedar Street Storage PUD District shall adhere to the approved Final Stage PUD plans and development ORDINANCE NO. 829 14 agreement. (5) The specific flexibility and conditions of the Cedar Street Storage PUD District shall be as follows A. Multiple principal buildings are permitted on the single parcel in the district. B. The PUD provides flexibility from building setback requirements, particularly along the south boundary of a zero setback. C. Parking for the facility shall be informal and scattered throughout the district as required by tenants. D. Free-standing signage and landscaping shall be as per approved Final Stage PUD Development Plans. E. No outdoor storage shall be permitted within the PUD. (6) In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the Final Stage PUD, then the applicant shall seek a PUD Amendment per the processes of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and as directed by the Community Development Department. (7) Where there are any conflicts in the allowed uses or required performance standards between the Cedar Street Storage PUD District and any other applicable zoning regulations, the requirements of the Cedar Street Storage PUD District and its associated plans shall prevail. (8) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of § 153.028(0)(10). The city may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. N 15 ORDINANCE NO. 829 Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 2411 day of June, 2024. Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk AYES: NAYS: irt CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AMENDING SECTION 153.047 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CREATING THE CEDAR STREET STORAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AND REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO CEDAR STREET STORAGE PUD DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Planned Unit Development for a commercial project, consisting of Commercial Self Storage, to be platted as Lot 1 of the concurrent request for the Cedar Street Storage Addition plat; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD District would create the uses and standards applicable to all development in the Cedar Street Storage District, to consist of a multiple -building commercial self storage facility as an allowed use in the proposed Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to requests for a preliminary plat for the proposed project, and a Development Stage PUD approval for the Cedar Street Storage PUD District; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD and its associated plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the adopted Cedar Street Storage PUD District standards, as well as other applicable standards of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial and Residential Flex, currently zoned as the Pointes at Cedar District; and WHEREAS, the proposed Cedar Street Storage PUD District establishes standards and development regulations which are inconsistent with the current Pointes at Cedar Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and 17 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-18 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4th, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed Zoning District is required to address the existing use, and provide the potential for expansion due to the intent and purpose of the plans, goals, and policies of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan related to the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, provided the development is adequately screened from the adjoining Pointes at Cedar area. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD District and the associated development plans accommodate additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed PUD does not interfere with reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. As a property which has been used for commercial self storage for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding properties or values. 7. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the proposed amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance creating the Cedar Street Storage PUD District, and rezoning the area being platted as Lot 1 of the Cedar Street Storage PUD District. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-18 ADOPTED this 41h day of June, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION 9 By: Paul nsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, nity Development Director 19 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C�IiiilZ�l�►TCd►�i�r�l�I��I:Z��Iul►d ►�l �1�I1►r�1;��I�/��>��T3_1 DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD FOR CEDAR STREET STORAGE ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a development stage Planned Unit Development approval for a addition to a multiple building commercial self storage project; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD would consist of development existing and proposed commercial self storage buildings as an allowed use in the proposed Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to requests a preliminary plat for the proposed project, and an amendment to the City's PUD zoning ordinance and rezoning to Cedar Street Storage PUD District; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the adopted PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial Residential Flex uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Development Stage PUD addresses all additional improvements serving the project, as well as site and architectural improvements on Lot 1 of the project and plat; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PUD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and 20 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-19 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 41", 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 6. As a property which has been utilized for commercial self storage for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 7. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the proposed Development Stage PUD for Cedar Street Storage Addition be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. The PUD is subject to submission of final stage site plans compliant with these conditions, with no outdoor storage allowed on site. 21 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-19 The applicants identify a suitable maintenance process for the south side of the building and site area, to be approved by the City Council. 3. The applicants supplement the request with a Landscape Plan that shows extensive screen plantings consistent with the Central biome of The Pointes at Cedar along the south boundary not occupied by the new building. 4. Th-e- c/jnts prsv,de intense seiceeRiRg f r the ass p rty line aFea, er in t4 , alternative, the applicants extend the Seree—A i.vali (similaic te that_ u-sed- en the applieant&� Chelsea Read site) fice -, the building to the ass property ur„. CONDITION REMOVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION The City approves vacation of easements that lie under existing or proposed building sites, with drainage and utility easements to be reestablished per the City Engineer's recommendations. 6. Compliance with the terms of the Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator's letter dated May 30, 2024. 7. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer's Office as applicable. 8. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONT NNING COMMISSION B 9 Y• Paul onsor, Chair ATTEST: n / \ Angela %ScC munity-Development Director 22 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CEDAR STREET STORAGE ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a preliminary plat of a parcel of currently developed land; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat would incorporate development opportunity an additional commercial self storage building as an allowed use in the proposed Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities; and WHEREAS, the platted parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements under the appropriate PUD standards; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial Residential Flex uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat shows a single development parcel, upon which the existing and proposed buildings will be located, as well as other improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the plat pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 41h, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 23 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-20 The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed plat accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed plat accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 7. As a property which has been utilized for such uses for many years, the proposed plat is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the plat will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the proposed Preliminary Plat for Cedar Street Storage Addition be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. The PUD is subject to submission of final stage site plans compliant with these conditions, with no outdoor storage allowed on site. 2. The applicants identify a suitable maintenance process for the south side of the building and site area, to be approved by the City Council. 3. The applicants supplement the request with a Landscape Plan that shows extensive screen plantings consistent with the Central biome of The Pointes at Cedar along the south boundary not occupied by the new building. 24 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-20 Q. The alternative, the plicaRts .,..+end the sereen kkla.114�.,. +: thn ►\ edeR the plie-.RtS' Chelsea Read site) fr.,m the building t the eu5t propeFty line -CONDITION REMOVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION The City approves vacation of easements that lie under existing or proposed building sites, with drainage and utility easements to be reestablished per the City Engineer's recommendations. 6. Compliance with the terms of the Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator's letter dated May 30, 2024. 7. Comments and recommendations of the City Engineer's Office as applicable. 8. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 41h day of June, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTI LANNING COMMISSION By: Paul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schurr�arm, Community Development Director 25 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING REVOCATION OF A PREVIOUS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CEDAR STREET STORAGE ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a zoning amendment and development stage Planned Unit Development approval for an addition to a multiple building commercial self storage project; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD would consist of development existing and proposed commercial self storage buildings as an allowed use in the proposed Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the site is concurrently subject to requests for a preliminary plat for the proposed project, and an amendment to the City's PUD zoning ordinance and rezoning to Cedar Street Storage PUD District; and WHEREAS, the plat creates a dedication for public easements, and adequate right of way related to public streets along with drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD; and WHEREAS, the current CUP-PUD no longer accommodates the need for expansion, nor is it consistent with the future land uses around the property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PUD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies, and recommends the Cedar Street Storage PUD as replacement for the current CUP-PUD; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4th, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 27 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-21 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 6. As a property which has been utilized for commercial self storage for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 7. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota recommends to the City Council that the current Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Cedar Street Storage Addition be revoked, subject to the following conditions: The property is rezoned to Cedar Street Storage PUD District, and the Final PUD and Final Plat for Cedar Street Storage are approved and recorded, along with any required development agreements or other documents. ADOPTED this 4 t h day of June, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 28 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-21 MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann o unity Development Director 29 Return To: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT APPLICANT: Bruce Stainbrook FEE TITLE PROPERTY OWNER: MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PROCEEDINGS StorageLink of Monticello, LLC. ORDER #2024-21 REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The above entitled matter came to be heard before the Monticello City Council this 24th day of June, 2024 on a request for Revocation of a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, pursuant to the City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance for the following described property: Lot 1, Block 2, Amax Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. W That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds West, along the North line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1056.00 feet, thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds West, parallel with the East line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 632.54 feet to the centerline of a 80.00 foot roadway and utility easement and the actual point of beginning, thence continue South 00 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds West, on said parallel line, 291.46 feet, thence South 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds West, parallel with the North line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 319.14 feet to the East line of a tract of land recorded in Book 293 of Deeds, page 872, in the Office of the Wright County Recorder, thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 07 seconds East along said East line and its northerly extension, 342.26 feet to the centerline of said 80.00 foot roadway and utility easement, thence North 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds East, along said centerline, 17.39 feet, thence continue along said centerline, 64.41 feet Easterly along a tangential curve, concave southerly, having a central angle of 12 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds and a radius of 300.00 feet, thence South 78 degrees 33 minutes 14 seconds East, along said centerline, tangent to curve, 159.19 feet, thence 63.27 feet easterly along said centerline on a tangential curve, concave northerly, having a central angle of 12 degrees 05 minutes 02 seconds and a radius of 300.00 feet, thence North 89 30 degrees 21 minutes 44 seconds East, along said centerline, 18.25 feet to the actual point of beginning. IT IS ORDERED that a Revocation of a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development be granted to allow for a new Planned Unit Development District be established based on the following findings: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed PUD accommodates additional public and private improvements, including streets, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed access and development details meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 6. As a property which has been utilized for commercial self storage for many years, the proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 7. Approval of the PUD will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) CITY OF MONTICELLO I, Rachel Leonard, City Administrator for the City of Monticello, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of Order #2024- granting a Revocation of a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. A copy of this Order has been forwarded to the applicant. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at Monticello, Minnesota, in the County of Wright on the day of , 2024. Rachel Leonard, City Administrator Drafted By: Hayden Stensgard City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 31 Request for Prelim & Final Plat - Dev & Final PUD PIDs: 155-213-002010,155-500-142305, 155-500-142304 Address: 36 Dundas Road Created by: City of Monticello 32 P.O. Box 425 377 StfllpAgyg4inkSartell, MN 5677 Tel: 320.257.2323 SELF STORAGE info@StorageLink.net www.StorageLink.net Greetings — We currently have "stand alone" storage units (often referred to as PODS) that line a portion of our South property line, at our 36 Dundas Road location. These units are currently allowed as part of a Conditional Use Permit that is set to expire this year. With the city currently working through a master plan for The Points of Cedar, which surround this facility, we are proposing an Amendment to the existing Conditional Use Permit for PUD allowing us to remove the PODS and construct a building along this portion of the South Property line. This building would only have doors facing into the facility and the exterior facing South would be Stucco to create a nice -looking screen, like the exterior of our Chelsea Road location. The site lighting, signage and landscaping will not be changing with this application request. As part of this process, we would plat the three existing parcels into a single lot. I have attached the supporting materials to help you fully visualize our proposal which include: • Preliminary plat • Final plat • Civil Engineering plans • Building Plans • Pictures of the exterior wall Thanks for your consideration. We look forward to working with the city on The Points of Cedar development. Sincerely, Bruce Stainbrook 33 Vicinity Map oq North Quarter corner of - \ /i �41'(�4 Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 / .A, " I CHELSEA RD // r N (CrQQ I � ' lf'1 hr U z , DUNDAS RD O -w Site _¢I---- Z r S 89 ° 00' 47" W 1056.00 EXISTING PID: 155-267-001010 ^� o I Z 5 89°OS' 38" W (D) 2 l SCHOOL BLVD O -J OWNER: RRG HOLDINGS LLC / w r NO SCALE - / ;..,. .. SEC 14, TVVv 121, RNG 25 \ / North line of the / S1 /2 NW1 /4 Northeast corner -/ .... . ........ : . * : f. I .. of the 51 /2 NW1 /4 i /// \ ' ' ' • East line of the 51 /2 NW1 /4 y , �•. (North south quarter section line) N �� EXISTING PID: 155 500 142303 ,r, Former centerline of old -� / // - - - �'"'_,� OWNER: CITY OFMONTICELLO ' Minnesota Highway No. 25 \\ i / _ � - • Centerline of 80.00 foot wide : I - - Line parallel with the East line L`' A, / ---_ _ _ _ _ : - - - - - - - - - - _ _ / Roadway Et Utility Easement per ' of the 51 /2 NW1 /4 0 / =1 �� // Book 75 of Misc. a e 260 L9 : ' M / - Centerline of 80.00 foot I / ' P g N 1' o i M I / M / / wide Roadway Et Utility \ i _ , u i ;` // Easement per Book 75 : , N 89`Ov• it. 'T'``Q= 12 ° 18' 08" i - _ _ _ i ,6 o -x• ... to / � of Misc, page 260 .:: •' • :.r: :. •`•' :: •`•' ::.`. `•' ::.`.:: •`•' :: •`•' : * :. •`•' : • •`.•' : • •`•' : • •`•' : • •`•' : • • • : 47 E� . . _ � / I EXI STING PID: 155-230-000010 a, / J�89••. . 3 - Yr - - - :,.: 9: R- :• is ER ITY F TI ELL �' 3 OWN C 0 MON C 0 0 .� 0 / .0 8^ 0•• I 4 _ - 1 2 13 _-- 0 3 I: --- DO --- .1 7 l 8 I 1 ,.. L - 21.19 6 1' 1 0 I I / 3 E• ,E 3' 1 xi I > 3 .•40 5 - 4" 'S I� R 9 1 1 9..:':....:....... o ... 3 C B= N 89 ° 46' 53 E- d _ _- _ 12 1 g Og�• x. .. •.. N . -- - :�'' 3 --- - ::: , L 63 8 "E CH- 21.19 _ _ - 5.83 - 1 a ♦ _ - - °2 4 �� - - 4T E 108.42 _ R_ . R \ 1': • 9 3 s 6 - N 89 00 r R z6 00 ... o.00 D .o : N •..-. G N 25 l _ - Permanent easement _ _ D ,�, r e u A S 1 8• N •M1r. c / �� - rD 12 2 1 R e oc. No. 659 9 ."a l �'1 tz P �. A D :� P •in u o t f innin $ R o be 7 S 8: � 8° a .. , a• �1� �• 4 1' 0 5" I ,. 1 �o 5 9 3 . ° .1 Q° 0 5 I 0 9 3 • �- - ° 1 pp.. - - °� 2 ° : 1/2" dia. Iron Pi � '�-; �=' :*:' 0 5' I ' 0 0 / ,, .:' �RL529729- 1�t9 .r1 I L- 7 / 0 1 7 t: 1 v. 1 0 I O 3 40 .00 I T - ..; �} .;: ,•. f• // // / // -_ /io %/ O� i I / ,:: I South uarter corner of 1 �o Q I / 0 1� I C • Sec. 14 Tw 121 Rn 25 ;./ :d, ... I r.. / / Exi co• o k : sti n s :' .. tora e # bui (din e �i :9. I :,� • i' 8 ,/ I v 1. / 9 / / / / II . / / o� �; o }: I I I°- I ST'' w ''�., ////// 3 l LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 2, Amax Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. AND That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds West, along the North line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1056.00 feet, thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds West, parallel with the East line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 632.54 feet to the centerline of a 80.00 foot roadway and utility easement and the actual point of beginning, thence continue South 00 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds West, on said parallel line, 291.46 feet, thence South 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds West, parallel with the North line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 319.14 feet to the East line of a tract of land recorded in Book 293 of Deeds, page 872, in the Office of the Wright County Recorder, thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 07 seconds East along said East line and its northerly extension, 342.26 feet to the centerline of said 80.00 foot roadwa and utilit easement thence North 89 de rees 08 minutes Y Y g 38 seconds East, along said centerline, 17.39 feet, thence continue along said centerline 64.41 feet Easter( alon a tan ential curve concave souther( Y g g Y havin a central an le of 12 de rees 18 minutes 08 seconds and a radius of g g g 300.00 feet thence South 78 de rees 33 minutes 14 seconds East alon said g � g centerline, tangent to curve, 159.19 feet, thence 63.27 feet easterly along said centerline on a tangential curve, concave northerly, having a central angle of 12 de rees 05 minutes 02 seconds and a radius of 300.00 feet thence North 89 g , de rees 21 minutes 44 seconds East alon said centerline 18.25 feet to the g g actual oint of be innin . P g g Existin Pro ert Site Address: 36 Dundas Road Monticello MN 55362 g P Y > Current Zonin = g The Pointes at Cedar District PCD MAPPING LEGEND Central (Tilia) Sub -District o "' +'• •^' •/ /////////////////////// STORM SEWER MANHOLE C: :: 0 9;, L: '••S 7'. 7 M 1' •:ti:" / I 1 SANITARY SEWER MANHO LE / o ii / i� iJ /i i/� /r 1 i%iii//)iii%ii• °/ o ::... I ii%i/ii/i/iiiii/iiiiiiifili o 1 .I;.• '/ -•. ••�''• •/ CATCH BASIN �: , N o %: ;i Office building o 0 O I .o /:. •/ CULVERT APRON - :/ I O, ` I .. / Existing storage building , M N r •°:: ' / .. •I.-r: . ... .. , M N /:: / �O WELL o // / / W �► / / T (. / //. / HYDRAN / / / •'%..i/. (i(.(/�//. 1. //. r. / ,.. ,W e WAT R VA LV E N CV E 1 �:. �; 1 �. 0\ --:., �:' :; 1 N o., 1 r` �. ,. �: E UTI ITY HANDHOL 11 :C: O, W L 1 r r• '•o 0 . I N•' 1 O - P LE _ U g°• O L IGHT 0 �.:.: M is I J Z'. BL K 1 N OC P LE UTI ITY 0 to 1 L i% iiii u, 0 iii /i N i/• /i ii %Ti >v O , H R UTI ITY PO ANC 0 /i /ii /% L LE •� /iJ/i ►1 / iii:%• .. .. iii/iii/ �//////// °`� ..-.. . i/iil/iiii%iillii: /'' O / ; � Temporary storage structure ..-.:"+ UTILITY PEDESTAL EXISTING PID: 155 213 001010 ) o� (�. / I r . i : `�I �.'' Y ETER UTI IT M Exi / L stin s for I ae bu; L T 1 (din O / g E xis i g to ° st r oa g eb I� uildin g OWNER: AUTOZONE PARTS INC , d- O / , /. g g �. i: !� ' / I /' �' 'j:' I'i, �' h TANK (AS SPECIFIED) M ":� ^^f Z f/!/.///////////�/ / / / / /':'..' '.°y; °: / '.° SEWER CLEANOUT iii/(��(��.��/.//�.�/� / // s° / / / / / ./ / / /i //./ r / i r 1 1 :.9 :'.:'ir.:: ..... ....... ...... ....... M : // / / T TATI W LIF S ON U t j :�. �tS ' :J. 1 1 :''. :''. E ID TR D C UOUS EE � l ) :.� : ;'. :�:• v. a _ ;�... %,/.. // /// // E ER REE // TR V G N ii/ EE / //// /ii/i iiiii• J I .'i : ii /i iii• J , /// /i%/i%%ii%/iii//.ii/iii/// :�: SO BOR NG : q62 I �..%. .... t ....1 / : SURFACE DRAINAGE ARROW `, r.; .; Existing storage building / • r /-" I r:':': Existing stora a buildin ] BURIED ELEC C L N "+:. / //// /// //////////// / / / '•':` :' ;+ ;'.'.` , :-C BURIED TELEPHONE LINE / ;I.., /.. /./. (/.. l/.C(/,//../// / /. >. / f� :i: ast line of a tract land • E ,: / FIB R PTI INE / BURI D E O C L E ............ . ::. �.. :�. �: (r/�i /ir / m ,. ag' /. / .described in Book 293 - 6' �/ (. . ... ... : . : ,.....,.... ... ....... ........ . ,.. ......:: .. . ,....,... .. ... .. . BURIED GAS LINE •... ... ... ... .... 1,.,,.,,.,,..,;.,,..•;,,.•;,,.•;,,,,,,;,;;;, •,.;:.;,.;:; Deeds a e87 d a. ron 0 ST . of 2 •�:; ' Pe Pg .............. ..,.. ..... ............ . / .. ..,. _ ..................._=_, •,... 1/2 dla. Iron R e - 9�' RL5 15233 RHEAD P ER INE 8f• i . 0.3 feet norther! °of comer :' OVE OW L 3 �� Broken ca � � � .. , . _ P �� p� �.••' •.•'s�:•: i..:' / 0.2 feet easterly of corner Temporary stora a structure - - - - - - - - - : r WATER L I N E . / - - - �IS 89°08' 38" W (D) 319.14 � - 96 , 206.13 \\�\\C\\C\\�\\�\ 1 STORM SEWER PIP E �� \ _-.�J __s �,1 ..-I `Tem ora stora estructure SANITARY SEWER PIPE ... :.• .. - P rY ----------------------- 1 g a I/ S 8 0'47" W 55.22 C--y�J------------ qbr J S) Retaining walls CONC. CURB Et GUTTER a `� Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant / 90 I 2 A -J.I ..,... ... Elev = 966.63 (NAVD 88) I / I , ,, „ , , PROPERTY LINE : / I 1 o � Encroachment Agreement area / CONTROLLED ACCESS o � .....„,... i..,.% er Doc. No. 1270996 I/ EXISTING PID: 155-230-000010 CHAINLINK FENCE P Line parallel with the North line o a of the 51 /2 NW1 /4 OWNER: CITY OF MONTICELLO p WOOD FENCE _. Z at) • •-•••• • •-• BARB WIRE FENCE N Y Ln Q un 0 'a z Z) o W W 0 PROPERTY BOUNDARY MONUMENT LEGEND O SET IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED "DELEO 40341" • FOUND IRON MONUMENT ® SET MAGNETIC "PK" NAIL QQ GOVERNMENT SECTION CORNER MONUMENT (D) DIMENSION PER DEED OF RECORD (CSA) DIMENSION PER CEDAR STREET ADDITION Drainage and utility easements are shown thus: 12I I I I 12IN N ----� Public way Being 12 feet in width and adjoining public ways, side lot lines, and rear lot lines, unless otherwise indicated on this plat. ....... . • , : ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM ASSUMES THAT THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER QUARTER OF SEC. 14, TWR 121, RNG. 25 BEARS SOUTH 00°00' 30" EAST 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET . .. . . . .... . : NO. REVISIONS SINCE INITIAL DATE OF 02/12/2024 DATE 1120 Industrial Park Road Brainerd, MN 56401 218-829-5333 13 North 11th Avenue St Cloud, MN 56303 320-259-1266 K R A M E R LEAS D E L E O S U R V E Y I N G • ENGINEERING • P L A N N I N G B R A I N E R D S T. C L o U D WOVEN WIRE FENCE TREELINE WETLAND EXISTING CONTOURS BUILDING SETBACK G -OHP 1 -'> -'» xc xw P-BUR - T-BUR -F/D -BUR Part of currrent Count Tax Parcel ID = 155-213-002010 155-500-142304 Et Y > 155-500-142305 Dundas Road Et Cedar Street are Local Roadways. THE POINTES AT CEDAR DISTRICT REGULATIONS There are no building setbacks. There are no minimum lot dimensions. There is no minimum or maximum buildin hei ht. g g A minimum Floor Area Ratio FAR of 0.4 shalll be maintained for sin le stor ( ) g Y buildin s. g There was no evidence of wetland observed within the area to be platted. To o ra hic features shown hereon are from a field surve com leted on P g P Y P 01 / 1712024. G- OHP- Access to property will be provided via an existing driveway to Dundas Road. > - >__ CONTACT INFORMATION xc - Owner and Developer - Bruce Stainbrook _ 36 Dundas Rd W Monticell, MN 55362 Phone: 320-257-2323 1091 BSB - SOILS TYPE BOUNDARY ---------- D6_7A-___ D67B CONCRETE ° ° ° ° 01 BITUMINOUS GRAVEL ° ' °, .o.•.o,.-.a- o.••o,.'%01� ,. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Signature: _,51'" •e / V l/ Z.c 02 / 13 / 2024 Samuel J. DeLeo, MN License No. 40341 Date PROJECT NO. STORL2401 \ Land Survevor- Sam DeLeo Kramer Leas DeLeo, P.C. 13 North 11 th Ave. St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone: 320-259-1266 PLAT AREAS (+/-) Entire Plat = 3.50 Acres Block 1 Lot 1= 3.20 Acres ROAD R/W= 0.30 Acres \ �\ Preliminary Plat of 4- CEDAR STREL I STORAG E O For property at: 36 Dundas Road Z City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota a) Located in Section 14, Township 121 North, Range 25 West n 34 North Quarter corner of - CEDAR STREET STORAGE Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 00 Lq o_ M S 89 ° 00' 47" W 1056.00 ........ S 89°08' 38" W (D) ;..,. .:..,;... i .•� North line of the Northeast corner - S1 /2 NW1 /4 of the S1 /2 NW1 /4 , East line of the S1 /2 NW1 /4 (North -south quarter section line) N ` Ln Line parallel with the East line W _ _ _ - - - _ _ ' of the S1 /2 NW1 /4 0 � � _ --"-7 ----- - - - - Center line of 80.00 foot wide �� r� N Centerline of 80.00 foot I - - - ,' roadway and utility easement o i wide Roadway It Utility I N Easement per Book 75 w 89 ° ^ �= 12 - _ " ' o i of Misc., page 260 171 =r 00' 4�., 1$' 08" _ .o N i ; N 1 E .r L= 64.41 I _ M + N 89 °08 38."�09 R= 300.00 --0=01°32'13"- 00°U1,1 -- ++ it S780 - - - - - - - - - - I L= 21.19 6„ I S7a° 31' 05..E 3, E l ` , Jc ► R= 790.00 40.01 I >4""E(D) 159• 19 - '9 13 5 CB= N 89°46' 53" E c: o= 12°18' 12°05' 02" 4 1 3 \ \ ► I;- os' L= 63.27 15B9°21' 4X E - - - - I CH= 21.19 N 89 ° 00' 47" E 108.42 '+*--0 R= 260 Op Dlj)VDA R= 300.00 N a•25 (D) r permanent easement - - -� - - ` per Doc No 1265929 N 47 ° 11' 46" E -- I - - - - - - - '- -i' - - - I S 78 ° S Ri�A D g Point of beginning -' , 35.81--------- --___ 4'05' t I i � 'E � 'E 59.19 , o 0 3 53 t 1 ` 112" dia. Iron Pipe ' O - - _ �= 12 05' 02" q (RLS 21729) v co - - _ _ L= 71. 71 ..N $ 04 R= 340.00 g I ------------------1------- _ ' I 00- _ _ South Quarter corner of -' I , - - - - - - - Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 I PLAT AREAS +/- ENTIRE PLAT 3.50 Ac. BLOCK 1 - LOT 1 = 3.20 Ac. ROAD R/W = 0.30 Ac. --------------' o so L1 ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM ASSUMES THAT THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER QUARTER OF SEC. 14, TWP. 121, RNG. 25 BEARS SOUTH 00°00' 30" EAST 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET 1120Industrial Park Road Brainerd, MN 56401 218-8295333 13 North 11 th Avenue St. Cloud, MN 56303 320259-1266 K-LD KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING B R A I N E R 0 ST. CLOUD N I � -. I 1 � ' LLI 3 '_ 0 N I 1 1 00 I -• i N I O O p o I cI4 Ln Ln .o T_ �o W 1 0% II 00 f14 .. : 11 N O 0 CD BLOCK 1C14 I LL I M 00 L-Li 1 _ N;ZZ 1 O , IN Y- 1 LOT 1 Lr, 1 o 1 0O I , N h Ln I I S SEC If . .!. 1 ..... .. I / / � I / I / East line of a tract land / described in Book 293 ' 1 of Deeds, page 872 ti 112" dia. Iron Pipe - 112" dia. Iron Pipe (RLS 15233) 1 ;" / (Broken cap) ' 0.3 feet northerly of corner - / 0.2feet easterly ofcomer ---------------- ' - I ------------------------------------ T -----------20 589°08'38"W(D) 319.14 !.• S 89°00' 47" W 525.27 _ I 525.22 (CSA) I I Line parallel with the North line I' ". of the S1 /2 NW1 /4 Drainage and utility easements are shown thus: 121 1 1 1 121 - - N N Public way Being 12 feet in width and adjoining public ways, side lot lines, and rear lot lines, unless otherwise indicated on this plat. PROPERTY BOUNDARY MONUMENT LEGEND O SET IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED "DELEO 40341" • FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 SET MAGNETIC "PK" NAIL QQ GOVERNMENT SECTION CORNER MONUMENT (D) DIMENSION PER DEED OF RECORD (CSA) DIMENSION PER CEDAR STREET ADDITION SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION Vicinity Map KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That StorageLink of Monticello, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property situated in the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota to wit: Lot 1, Block 2, Amax Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. AND That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds West, along the North line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1056.00 feet, thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds West, parallel with the East line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 632.54 feet to the centerline of a 80.00 foot roadway and utility easement and the actual point of beginning, thence continue South 00 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds West, on said parallel line, 291.46 feet, thence South 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds West, parallel with the North line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 319.14 feet to the East line of a tract of land recorded in Book 293 of Deeds, page 872, in the Office of the Wright County Recorder, thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 07 seconds East along said East line and its northerly extension, 342.26 feet to the centerline of said 80.00 foot roadway and utility easement, thence North 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds East, along said centerline, 17.39 feet, thence continue along said centerline, 64.41 feet Easterly along a tangential curve, concave southerly, having a central angle of 12 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds and a radius of 300.00 feet, thence South 78 degrees 33 minutes 14 seconds East, along said centerline, tangent to curve, 159.19 feet, thence 63.27 feet easterly along said centerline on a tangential curve, concave northerly, having a central angle of 12 degrees 05 minutes 02 seconds and a radius of 300.00 feet, thence North 89 degrees 21 minutes 44 seconds East, along said centerline, 18.25 feet to the actual point of beginning. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as CEDAR STREET STORAGE and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the public way and drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said StorageLink of Monticello, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 Bruce K. Stainbrook President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by Bruce K. Stainbrook, President, of StorageLink of Monticello, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. CHELSEA RD 4 NDA4 RD - (Notary Signature) Z Notary Public LU -HOOLBLVD O My commission expires a NO SCALE >.1, RNG 25 I Samuel J. DeLeo do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and Labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet Lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 Samuel J. DeLeo, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 40341 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS The foregoing Surveyor's Certification was acknowledged before me this day of , 2C by Samuel J. DeLeo, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License Number 40341. Sidney Theis Notary Public Stearns County, Minnesota My commission expires January 31, 2027 CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION (Notary Printed Name) County, Minnesota Reviewed by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello this day of , 20 Chairperson CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Approved by the City of Monticello, Minnesota this 20 Mayor Secretary Clerk day of 0 WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021 Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of ,20 Wright County Auditor/Treasurer Deputy WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this day of , 20 , at o'clock . M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. , Sleeve , as Document No. Wright County Recorder 02/12/2024 DRAT i 33 0 0 U V) Q) N O b0 DUNDAS ROAD `------__ �- __,----- STAINING WALL/ FENCE -- ---_- 4� < / / - - - _ - - - T-BUR�- - _ _ T-BUR -T-BUR LANDSCAPtN-G /^- - ,{ .. ... -BUR... ---_ _ /..'a. ..e. a ..a,°.d °... - / d . A' ."A \ °BUR 1 ° .. - a 9 d ' ®. .. d, ...\ . .. a .. ° �� . a .+ d W •.. q' d , . e 4 . e• ° e; _ a e ° d _ \. I ° w. w : e �, / .qa •. a: .. t -.� - _p96q., `a °e.'' +° m.a° a d �:: " .. s a° I •' P'. . a ' a ° I .: : 4: a .. L: • ...: ��`__ GRAPHIC SCALE ee °e. m - - - - - -- - - - - a < ° a e ... d' - qe 4 a °� 30 15 30 60 I • ° 0 '. . ,:.. °: :.. . ® ® ® ® a NTRAI_C ::SATE •f4 A. ....: �: / aA. I ( IN FEET ) ►� F EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING 4. I I,F: °I /° d •• ,a..d 'a • ..d. a. • ,a�' ,4.,•. : eIII 4.• 4 . a 4 . °.4 q 4. d 1 inch = 30 ft. /.'. \. d° 4. .. q °III I , de y • ,. i 4 . ed' u J: / ee < v : \ . d' • e 4 .v ° e a .4' •' q dv .. ow n a a I •pa _ 1 :Q.. ° .� A. ° ° . d •Y tr.. • a! 1. d -a' •'/ dPq, p NOTESI m I ..4 i i 4'.`y ° L as .' , / I Z rn c a, O 0 E Z N 1p 1p I I I I -a ./ / OFFICE 1. BASE PLAN USED IS A BOUNDARY SURVEY PREPARED BY KRAMER LEAS 4�.P°•.'°..a. '/ BUILDING / �-2 0 Mn ,...:. .. d , / DELEO P.C. I III / EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING /°':4. ::. �' ;'::' I I d .A. / Ejw f0 � Cl) N .4 / d ) III �m//// /// ////�// ///// //////// / /////////// /// / ,' / I a �. !!- �.. it : / l .- d . i //.�,� :. ;.a ::..(` 2. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE I III w A .4 .I,aQ .. , y, • a s d 7 / ° ' • ! ° . A. . ° ° es ° °. �. 4• °' g'' a °..a d Y ., 4 d . a N N (a 4 ea P : 4• ji < 4 .. . e d (0 a N �, Y APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ALL LOCATIONS AND c / .. as .. . dqy a A. e • •'' + - •.e °'d e'. a rnCU ."d.+ - �1 °; ' r a I ° I 8. ... •...' ' . II ..� � d. w ,e i°.' .�q : ,.. �•�8'° 'd e4a' a ..d :°• � �a•N N I I d� S ' 4 , a a , q / ,. 1::. q a� R SHALL CONTACT II ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR I d< :°: I - .. .. a e '. ' 'e.° U d a ..: : a " N �1 e.. II . ,.A'j °°. UTILITY COMPANIES VIA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. 0 N 0 . d. . . . ° U ., 4. ee U II ° .....' .. .. e . „ . a ' III N I I .. 9 .e.4 . ! a4° • d.'.. . ad °. .Q.. ld • ;. . ' . d. .. ;'. . e'°'i d. °'d .. ,+ a 4•. . 4 ' , N ,, �I I �� - I0-0 Er CO ::. 'g' .'Y ° 4. ° % / : a..11l 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RESTRICTIVE OF THE � :' ; Al ' a�.:�...: ' : w.: I l m i d / `° ° ' ! PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY I% I / III I / I Q / EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING i �:. % i'..:..';:,°lll OF MONTICELLO AND THE LATEST EDITION OF MNDOT STANDARD � w 1 IIII II '/ °'.' cnoOo / / I IIII I .4:'.:: •: / EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING /' : °:111 SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. z z ; :.. �Q: <'.T/ / a 4.. . O w w w 0 II :....q a 'A / a d. / • l�. 4 : / //////��r III I --A.. ° 4,. " -4 ' '.III w 1 I • :°. 4. THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE AND PROTOCOLS SHALL BE FOLLOWED FOR N N .. . d .. .4"a C� d: d °. ° A. II / da I d ° d .. .P .e • ' - . " ' .�.:". .. ��.' .. .: � a d:� AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DURING THE SITE DEVELOPMENT N 1 :a :.a � .. °`:a' . ... :�� a.� ..� EROSION A I d . . �: a d• 9.°\4///////i/�.:' : y='III PROCESS: / 4 / / a :. ° • �:e, °III A. INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROLS (SILT SOCK) AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS I 4 �� EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING �.'`.:..'' °'�A ° `d� ;8' 111 PRIOR TO START OF WORK. ay / INLET PROTECTION /. :1.;:a a / q m A•° :A: / / ° / B. NO CONCRETE WASHOUTS ARE ALLOWED ON THE PROJECT SITE. SOIL z / .../ I a / EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING / O :>: / . I ��.. l...... I / :.�.....:��...:.. a.,d....,a..:. a ..4...•d..s e .:'.a'•. 9J:. / / :w:.y.::'II STOCKPILES SHALL HAVE PERIMETER CONTROL AND HAVE TEMPORARY // a - ° . - d . 4.l . / ♦y 4 :� .971.83 a' a < a+4 P 4° 'e .a .:'. d.. 'e II MULCH. a ° r. b e d. ,. .. . e ... .. .. .. a SEED AND M 4. I 4 �20`0'. O ar d..a .. .. . .. .. a° a a4' , I I 962.50 962.50 a . . .. a te. d a ' : . 971.83 :.., ' .. , � ..:111 I z d: .. !. .'e`963.00 . 963.50'. °.,. •• tt C. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE I I °' °. ------I ^ 70/ _ _ _.-•- -d °'° �•a •''e . '1a: ° " .'.e <•:d•-° °e °a✓/ I UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED, /b I - _ I I PROPOSED BUILDING 'A' 150 - -- - - 964�� J�._ a .� -.- - - - d °' n� /� j _�,- 25 I 971.83 1+___ - -915► INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ON A WEEKLY BASIS 971.83 971.83 AREA = 6, 300 SF l 963.00 � f � / L- -� I „ � 9 2 c^ram, , 962.50 / � 971.83 _ ,/ AND AFTER EACH 112 OR MORE RAIN EVENT. CLEAN OR MAINTAIN O O 971.83 _-964---- /%�/ ':g'/ S96 ' - 963.00 SILT SOCK 963.50 963.50 // ---- THESE DEVICES AS NEEDED TO BE EFFECTIVE. REPLACE z DETERIORATED, DAMAGED OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES z Ali l IMMEDIATELY. � O Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant D. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND/OR O O Elev.= 966.63 (NAVD 88) PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DEPOSITION. REMOVAL OF TRACKING MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY WHEN IT OCCURS. SWEEPING MAY BE ORDERED AT ANY TIME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. E. PERFORM SITE REMOVALS, GRADING, EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT. SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF PROPOSED o PAVEMENT AND BUILDING AREAS IMMEDIATELY AFTER THIS WORK WHEN z � ACTIVITY WILL BE CEASED FOR 7 DAYS. W Q O F. CONSTRUCT BUILDING. FINE GRADE SITE AND RESTORE GREEN AREAS U U WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION OF SEED, MULCH AND FERTILIZER PER Q O PLANS. U z U� G. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES U z 1 AFTER SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND PERMANENT - O VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED WITH AT LEAST 70% COVERAGE. Q O O z 5. MPCA CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED SINCE LESS � � THAN ONE ACRE WILL BE DISTURBED. c� U U 4i- 6. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND PAVEMENT AS NEEDED TO z 0 O CONSTRUCT PROPOSED BUILDING. REPLACE CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO o O0 o c MATCH EXISTING SECTION. SHEET C-1 OF 1 SHEETS s; Sheet �ndex ?7 REVISION ey� Date -SAC V Abbrevi ati ons -- 3U _� \G SYS S 1 0: AG- 3U Ivs� \c4c* _D \G 0 ::) C —0 / 0 2 A\ Terms Terms Colors BEW Blank Endwall NTS. Not To Scale ASGY Ash Gray BSW Blank Sidewall O.C. On Center BWHT Bright White BLDG. Building OPP. Opposite CDRD Cedar Red CNR Corner PART Partition CLBG Classic Beige COL Column PT Partition CRMB Cream Beige CTR. Center PSF Pounds Per Sq. Foot CONB Conti. Brown DIA. Diameter PTD. Painted DTAN Desert Tan DBL. Double QTY. Quantity EVGN Evergreen EPDM Ethylene —Prop rene REQ'D. Required GARN Garnet EW Endwall R.O. Rough Opening IWHT Iced White EXT Exterior S.D. Self Drilling ORAN Sunset Orange F.O. Finished Opening STR. Starter PLBL Polar Blue F.M. Field Modify TYP. Typical ROYB Royal Blue GA. Gauge WWF Welded Wire Fabric SGRY Slate Gray GALV. Galvanized GALVM. Galvalume I.D. Inside Diameter INT Interior MISC. Miscellaneous MPH Miles Per Hour NOM. Nominal 10—DIGIT PART NUMBER Part Numbering 5000500000 COMPONENT NUMBER COLOR 2—DIGIT CODE GAUGE IDENTIFIES MATERIAL COLOR OR GAUGE STRUCTURAL PARTS USE GAUGE CODE NON—STRUCTURAL PARTS USE COLOR CODE 4—DIGIT RANDOM NUMBER RANGE FROM 0000 TO 9999 MOST COMPONENTS WILL FOLLOW A LOGICAL SEQUENCE BASED ON HOW OR WHERE THEY ARE USED ON A BUILDING 4—DIGIT COMPONENT CODE THIS IDENTIFIES A CLASS OF PARTS SUCH AS COLUMNS, HEADERS, BASEPLATES ETC. Imaginary 9—DIGIT NUMBER Decimal 33 41 Point coMPo'VENT FINISH LENGTH 5—DIGIT LENGTH FIRST 3—DIGITS = INCHES LAST 2—DIGITS ARE DECIMAL (FRACTION) ALWAYS IMAGINE A DECIMAL POINT BEFORE LAST 2—DIGITS 2—DIGIT CODE IDENTIFIES MATERIAL COLOR OR GAUGE STRUCTURAL PARTS USE GAUGE CODE NON—STRUCTURAL PARTS USE COLOR CODE 2—DIGIT PROFILE CODE THIS IDENTIFIES A STANDARD PROFILE SUCH AS PANELS, TRIMS, STUDS, ETC. 2-DIGIT 2-DIGIT 2-DIGIT 2-DIGIT 2-DIGIT 2-DIGIT GAUGE CODES WALL do TRIM DOOR or TRIM DOOR or TRIM S.S. Roof Special 12 = 12-GAUGE COLOR CODES COLOR CODES COLOR CODES COLOR CODES COLOR CODES 14 = 14-GAUGE 60 = Cream Beige 21 = Ash Gray 44 = Conti. Brown 10 = Regal White 28 = Clay 11 = Roman Blue 33 = Polar White 16 = 16-GAUGE 61 = Slate Gray26 = Matte Black 45 Garnet = 12 =Evergreen 37 =Sand Stone 18 = 18—GAUGE 62 = Classic Beige 31 = Patriot Red 46 = Evergreen 13 = Patrician Bronze 38 = VP Charcoal Black 63 = Iced White 40 = Sunset Orange 47 = Cedar Red 2—DIGIT 27 Li ht Stone 41 = Desert Tan 48 = Shale 14 = Surrey Beige 39 = VP Patrician Bronze = g 23 =Regal/Harbor Blue 49 =Natural Stone COLOR CODES 42 = Polar Blue 63 = Iced White 80 = Galvanized 43 = Royal Blue 64 = Bright White (Door) 24 = Colonial Red 65 = Yellow 82 = Galvalume 32 = Lime Green (Door only) 26 = Matte Black 66 = Silver Metallic 82 = Galvalume 67 =Birch White 6—DIGIT PART NUMBERS ARE ALSO USED. THESE FOLLOW NO SPECIFIC STRUCTURE. THEY ARE COMMONLY USED FOR FASTENERS, SWING DOORS, PEAK BOXES, AND SOME OTHER PARTS. Most of Trachte's standard color codes are shown. Special colors are not shown. Permit plans may not show the correct color of your desired building. The final erection set of drawings may show the correct colors ordered. The colors may not always be shown within the drawing set but the material listing will always show the correct color for the part listed. . r l G-7lossary Anchor Bolts -- Bolts used to anchor eave/base angles or channels, and base plates to a foundation (Concrete Screws) or other support. Angle, Eave/Base -- An angle or channel used at the base or top of a paneled wall section. Channels are Channel, Eave/Base usually used when the wall section is insulated. Base Plate -- A plate attached to the bottom of a column or jamb which rests on a foundation or other support, usually secured by anchor bolts. Bracing -- Angles or straps used in the plane of the roof and walls to transfer loads, such as wind, seismic and crane thrusts to the foundation. Bridging -- Series of bracing used in the roof framing to stiffen purlins. Clip -- A plate or angle used to fasten two or more members together. Column -- A main member used in a vertical position on a building to transfer loads from main roof rafters, or purlins to the foundation. Eave -- The line along the sidewall formed by the intersection of the planes of the roof and wall. Footing -- A pad or mat, usually of concrete, located under a column, wall or other structural member, that is used to distribute the loads from that member into the supporting soil. Girt -- A horizontal structural member that is attached to sidewall or endwall columns and supports paneling. Gutter -- A light gauge metal member at an eave, valley or parapet designed to carry water from the roof to downspouts or drains. Header -- The horizontal framing member located at the top of a framed opening, (doors). Jamb -- The vertical framing members located at the sides of an opening (doors). Purlin -- A horizontal structural member which supports roof covering. Rafter -- The main beam supporting the roof system. Rake Angle -- Angle fastened to purlins at rake for attachment of endwall or partition panels. Structural Line -- Usually chalk lines laid out on the foundation to aid in placing columns and other structural components of a building floor plan. Accurate placement of these lines is critical to erecting a building. Rake Trim -- A trim designed to close the opening between the roof and endwall panels. Ridge -- The horizontal line formed by opposing sloping sides of a roof running parallel with the building length. 4 Symbols & Materials 2 Revision Indicator 01 Notation Reference Detail Detail Identification/Reference Page Detail Detail Identification A( Detail Section Identification/Reference Page (Part No. Part Number Identification 12 Rise/Run Identification North Arrow o` 0 z DS Concrete Earth Insulation Down Spout PAGE # DESCRIPTION A1.0 FLOOR PLAN BUILDING A-1 131.0 FOUNDATION PLAN AND DETAILS C1.0 INTERIOR WALL FRAMING ELEVATION C2.0 END WALL FRAMING ELEVATION C2.1 END WALL FRAMING ELEVATION C3.0 ROOF FRAMING PLAN E1.0 SIDEWALL ELEVATIONS DETAILS E1.1 SIDEWALL ELEVATIONS BLDG G E1.2 SIDEWALL ELEVATIONS BLDG H E2.0 STEP PAGE F1.0 INTERIOR PARTITION WALL PANEL DETAILS F2.0 EXTERIOR PANEL PAGE DETAILS G1.0 STANDING SEAM ROOF J1.0 GUTTER PAGE Code Summary CODE 2020 MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE II B USE GROUP MODERATE HAZARD STORAGE, S-1 GROUND SNOW LOAD 50 psf SNOW EXPOSURE CATEGORY B SNOW IMPORTANCE FACTOR 1 WIND VELOCITY (V ULT) 115 mph WIND VELOCITY (V ASD) 89 mph WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY B RISK CATEGORY II SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION (SS) 0.050 SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION (Si) 0.023 SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION (SDS) 0.053 SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION (SDI) 0.037 SITE CLASS D SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY A k_xeneral Notes Structural Fasteners Trachte structural bolts are SAE J429—Grade-2 or ASTM A307A unless specifically noted. These are typically Trachte Part No's 760110 & 764200. All bolt holes shall be aligned to permit insertion of bolts without undue damage to threads. Bolts shall be placed in all holes and nuts threaded to complete assembly. Compacting joint to snug —fit condition shall progress systematically from most rigid part of joint. Snug —tightened condition is tightness attained with a few impacts of impact wrench or full effort of ironworker using ordinary spud wrench to bring connected plies into firm contact. Specification for Structural Joints Using High Strength Bolts, December 31, 2009 Self Drilling Fasteners Use self —drilling screws in the locations, quantities, and methods shown or noted on these drawings. Self —Drilling Fasteners should be used in accordance with SAE J78 specifications for Self —Drilling Screws. WARNING: When installing Self —Drilling screws, take care to minimize exposed screwpoint hazard, by locating screws next to panel bends and near recessed corners of angles. Structural Bracing All structural bracing is an integral part of the structural system and should be installed where noted or shown on the Floor Plans & Roof Framing Plans all connections should be consistent with all details related to installation of bracing components. Removal or alteration of bracing without prior authorization is prohibited. Temporary Bracing Temporary supports or bracing required to erect the building is the responsibility of the erector to determine, furnish, install and remove. Permits It is the responsibility of the Building Owner/ Contractor/ Erector to obtain all appropriate approvals and necessary permits from City, County, State, or other agencies as required. Structural Lines Structural lines are referenced often throughout our drawing details. These relate to the chalk lines that are to be laid out on the foundation. The lines should always be laid out taking into consideration the inherent imperfections commonly associated with foundations. The edge of a foundation is seldom straight enough to use as a base for dimensioning. It is recommended to begin your layout at 10'-1" from the sidewall edge (refer to "Locating The First Line" in the Trachte Erection Manual). All other lines should be placed accurately from the first line. By Others The design, detailing, and materials for items designated as "By Others" are not the responsibility of Trachte Building Systems, Inc. Field Cutting and Drilling Field cutting and drilling of some parts will be required. NOTICE: THE SPECIFIC PROJECT INFORMATION PROVIDED TO TRACHTE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. iPAS USED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, DETAILS, MATERIALS LIST AND PRICING. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETKEEN THIS INFORMATION AND THE ACTUAL JOB CONDITIONS WILL AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THIS )PORK TRACHTE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL MATERIALS OR ANY LAYOUT PROBLEMS CAUSED BY INACCURATE SITE INFORMATION. U C) E o 'CL Z L a , x m E Ln o E- O 0 zzx E- v�wraW a oZ o4 a GWW� U%AN GgV)cy) O Co 0 �21 1 O U Date Drawn by Scale Plan No. Order No. Sheet No. PLEASE RECHECK THIS INFORMATION CAREFULLY.' 0/\ H y 4/5/24 BRM N. T. S. 54717 B Cover 0/ OA OB OC OD OE OF \4 ------i-- STARTER BAY----��----- TYPICAL BAY ----- -- ----- - tructural ine I I ,,ti ructural �,,i ructural B tructural B nene4 2 0�,_ine 2.0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 8' 7.75" E VE 70' 0" 9'-3" EAVE 130'-0" (150'- : OVERALL) 0 I �(5994010818�(5992000718) 8" BLOCK-,,CSIIIIIIIIIII �/IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 o FIREWALL - i0 5994000718 _ (5991000518) (5992000516 ) �/ (IIIIIIIIIII � IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIYIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII - ° ^ ^ ^ � r r r r r r r O F i 01 I - (5950010418 }� HIGH SIDE C B N i0 _ i(5991000318) C OF STEP C2 (5992000316) C1. _i/` p - 5991000118) 6" PD STEP I NOTE COLUMN \� B Loll= A ORIENTATION A ( 5992000116) 1.0 IN STARTER BAY 2. 0 5994000118) 5950000118 ) iO r r DD U DF v DF v DF v DF v DF v DE h' DNG L DNH v DNH v DNH v DNH L DNH L DNH v DNH v DNH a DNH v DNH v DNH v DNH L 8" BLOCK FIREWALL 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - ♦ STARTER BAY DS DS DS DS DS DS DS 8-4 EAVE 70'-0" 8-10 EAVE 130'-0" (150'-0" OVERALL) A B 2.0 J1.0 _ _ MATCH SINE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 D32 9'-3" EAVE 20'-0" (150'-0: OVERALL) 9'-10.25" EAVE 90'-0" 5994002918 5994002918 8" BLOCK ll FIREWALL 8-10 EAVE 20'-0" (150'-0" OVERALL) 310;�- 0" 8" BLOCK FIREWALL _ 15991000718) p` �{ 5992000716) �{ 5991000718 ) �` rr rE1 .1 rri ri 1r IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII _ r � — HIGH SIDE OF STEP B A �{ 5992000516) 5991000518 ) n C2. rn C1.0 rrri ri fC C �{ 5992000316) 5991000318 ) f � 6"iFND STEP \\\ _T { 5992000116) I 5991000118 ) r rr rrr ri ri FI A - C 5950000118) 1' (5950000118 (5994000118 - 2• DNH DNG DNE a DNF a DNF a DNF u DNF DNF a DNF DNF DND �( 5045012163) 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" DS DS DS DS DS 9-4 EAVE 90'-0" A A J1.0 2.0 FLOOR PLAN FOR 8'-4$)/8'-10"/9'-4" EAVE, 1 /4:12 PITCH, MINI STORAGE BUILDING A-1 DOOR SCHEDULE QTY CODE TYPE SIZE ROUGH OPENING MANUF. DESCRIPTION 1 DD ROLL —UP 8'-0" x 7'-0" 8'-0" x 7'-0" TRAC—RITE/eq. ROLL —UP DOOR, 944 1 DE ROLL —UP 8'-8" x 7'-0" 8'-8" x 7'-0" TRAC—RITE/eq. ROLL —UP DOOR, 944 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 DF ROLL —UP 9'-0" x 7'-0" 9'-0" x 7'-0" TRAC—RITE/eq. ROLL —UP DOOR, 944 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I 1 DND ROLL —UP 8'-0" x 8'-0" 8'-0" x 8'-0" TRAC—RITE/eq. ROLL —UP DOOR, 944 '111111IIIIIII111111111111111111111111 „ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III 1 DNE ROLL —UP 8'-8" x 8$-0 8, —8„ x 8, —0» TRAC—RITE/eq. ROLL —UP DOOR, 944 7 DNF I ROLL —UP 9'-0" x 8'-0" 9'-0" x 8'-0" TRAC—RITE e ROLL —UP DOOR 944 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / q, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIII IiIiIiI1111111111111111111111 > » > " � " f » ''(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 2 DNG ROLL —UP 8 —8 x 7 —6 8 —8 x 7 —6 TRAC—RITE/eq. ROLL —UP DOOR, 944 r END WALL ELEVATION 13 DNH ROLL —UP 9'-0" x 7'-6" 9'-0" x 7'-6" TRAC—RITE/eq. ROLL —UP DOOR, 944 ROLL -UP DOORS MEET ASTM EJJO DO NOT ORDER DOORS BY OTHERS PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE ERECTION SET. END WALL ELEVA TION RO AND DOOR SIZES MAY VARY DUE TO ENGINEERING ISSUES. l;� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ��'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 lI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ��'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Y I Ir I I� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Il I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1;�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SIDE WALL ELEVA TION 1 /8 "=1 '- 0At . . . . - . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ai SIDE WALL ELEVA TION 1 /8 "=1 '- 0" REVISION Dote By� o� ��3p 2 cn �Ld �`O a zQQ�Z30�� o co O m p 0C DO O o o,U z3 EI tz w 3 k m �0 3 = O N N QLn O Q o o a a z x A -:4z �x 0 zz o z �a�a a �z� a A z 0 :a O 0 DO q) o � Date 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM Scale 1/8" = 1'-0" Plan No. 54717 B Order No. Sheet No. Al*0 n J /00 REVISION ey� Date OA OB OC OD O OF 1 2 3 4 5 0 70'-0" (15'-1" WIDE) LO I 0 I LO I I I I c i 1 A o �l 1. 0 _ I — T i LO 10'-0"J_ J_ 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" CONCRETE SCREW #4 REINFORCING BAR 1 CONTINUOUS WELDED WIRE if 9i" � 7 if 52 4" FABRIC VAPOR BARRIER 1» — — SLAB THICKNESS � �— — — — — — — — + CLE(SEE LEGEND) AR � i // f �// , � r 4" FILL .• 1,-4" 3" CLEAR ''i III III III II' 6" - - f it —on 1 FLOATING SLAB DETAIL, NOTCHED � GENERAL FOUNDATION NOTES�FOUNDATION'\""'� FOUNDATION SPECIFICATIONS LEGEND 1. FLOOR SLAB SHALL BE (SEE LEGEND) THICK WITH 6 X 6 - W1.4 X W1.4 WELDED WIRE FABRIC. PAVING OR FINISHED GRADE 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE OF A MIXTURE AND DENSITY TO YIELD A 2,500 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS. NOTE: STRUCTURAL DESIGN IS BASED ON 2,500 PSI. :`• ' ' FREE DRAINING HOWEVER, 3,000 PSI IS PREFERRED. y`'+ ':".:. INORGANIC GRANULAR FILL 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-615, GRADE 60 FOR #4 AND LARGER BARS, AND GRADE 40 FOR #3 BARS AND ALL DOWELS AND TIES. STEEL SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF RUST. LAP ALL REINFORCING A MINIMUM OF 28" AT SPLICES AND AROUND EARTH CORNERS. 4. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM WITH ASTM A-185, AND SHALL BE LAPPED 8 INCHES MINIMUM AT SLAB THICKNESS ALL SIDE AND END LAPS. NOTE: WELDED WIRE FABRIC IS USED IN THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THE FLOOR SLAB. » THEREFORE, FIBER REINFORCING CANNOT BE USED AS AN ALTERNATE. 5. VAPOR BARRIER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 MIL ■ CONCRETE SCREW POLYETHYLENE WITH JOINTS LAPPED NOT LESS THAN 6 INCHES. (INTERIOR) TO ET PROVIDED BYCT ACH EH BUILDING OSYSTEMS NCRETE SCREWS 3/8 „ x 2 1/2 " INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS ARE SPECIFIED IN NOTE 01 ON THE ERECTION DETAIL PAGES. CONCRETE SCREW 7. NON-STRUCTURAL ANCHORS SHALL BE EITHER (EXTERIOR) POWDER ACTUATED ANCHORS OR TAPCON SCREW ANCHORS. THESE ANCHORS ARE NOT SUPPLIED BY TRACHTE BUILDING SYSTEMS. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LOCATING 3 /8" x 2 1 /2" NON-STRUCTURAL ANCHORS ARE SPECIFIED IN NOTE 02 \ / ON THE ERECTION DETAIL PAGES. NON-STRUCTURAL ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 8. FREE DRAINING GRANULAR FILL SHALL BE A NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE FILL MATERIAL CONSISTING OF COURSE SAND, CRUSHED ROCK, OR AN APPROVED EQUIVALENT. FOUNDATION DESIGN NOTES: 1. FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWN IS DESIGNED FOR A PRESUMED 1,500 PSF ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE. 2. PLEASE NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY UNUSUAL CONDITIONS. GENERAL FOUNDATION NOTES: 1. NOTCH SHALL BE LEVEL WITH NO PITCH. 2. FOUNDATION MUST BE SQUARE AND LEVEL. 3. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS AT 15'-0" ON CENTER MAXIMUM SPACING. ALL CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE LOCATED AT LEAST 1 FOOT OFF OF THE TRACHTE BUILDING SYSTEMS COLUMN GRID SHOWN ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN. /NOTE � TRACHTE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. IS ONLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF THE FOUNDATION TO ACCEPT OUR BUILDINGS. THE DESIGN IS BASED ON THE PARAMETERS SPECIFIED IN THE NOTES, AND THE LOADS IMPOSED BY OUR BUILDING SYSTEM. IT IS THE OWNERS RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY TRACHTE'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ANY UNUSUAL SITE CONDITIONS OR OF ANY MATERIALS NOT SUPPLIED BY TRACHTE, THAT WILL IMPOSE LOADS ON THE FOUNDATION SYSTEM. ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOUNDATION, INCLUDING LABOR AND MATERIALS FOR PLACING OF REINFORCING STEEL AND CONCRETE IS BY OTHERS AND THEREFORE, NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF \ �TRACHTE BUILDING SYSTEMS. / 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 130'-0" (150'-0" OVERALL 20'-1" WIDE) I L I I I I I I � 6" STEP HEIGF T III I I I I I I I I I I I I I T J_ J_ 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" BLOCK FIREWALL — — (BY OTHERS) GRADE LINE #3 REINFORCING BAR WATERPROOFING II CONTINUOUS ®1' O.C. BY OTHERS 90'-0" (25'-1" WIDE) 1A 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1. 28 29 30 31 32 20'-0" (150'-0" OVERALL 20'-1" WIDE) - X i 0 N i o ,1 LO 1A 1) ��co 3 ZQ L ll 6" STEP HEIGF T B m ° 'U'-, L o I I I SIM I I 11 1 10'-0" - 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" - 10'-0" 10' -0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" - 1 1. 310'-0" OVERALL LENGTH 2" CLEAR .,� FOUNDATION PLAN for MINI STORAGE BUILDING A-1 #3 HOOKED BAR ® 11" O.C.FREE II o IN DRAINING WRAPPED GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL DRAIN BY OTHERS i I #3 REINFORCING BAR :• ` I CONTINUOUS WELDED WIRE ItFABRIC VAPOR BARRIER SLAB THICKNES S (SEE LEGEND) 4" FILL ________1'—4" �—— 3" CLEAR 3'-0" 1 A RETAINING WALL DETAIL DIMENSION VARIES f 2j"MIN. s CCONCRETE SCREW DIMENSION VARIES — 24"MIN. INSIDE EDGE OF POURED WALL ' D A CONCRETE SCREW LOCATION, CORNER WELDED WIRE VAPOR BARRIER FABRIC ` 1 -------/----------- /__ SLAB THICKNESS (SEE LEGEND) t . 4" FI LL I•I�• III III III III III III III III II�� - - #4 REINFORCING BAR CONTINUOUS WELDED WIRE VAPOR BARRIER FABRIC _ 52" i CLEAR SLAB THICKNESS (SEE LEGEND) 1 �� STEP HEIGHT 4" FILL �:; " :. ; ::.r :.s; j (SEE FOUNDATION PLAN) -- ------ SLAB THICKNESS " + 8" PAD/ y + (SEE LEGEND) 3 CLEAR •i /: ' ".� �'; :::... 4„ FILL } — — .• � � III I � III —III � H — - NOTE: THE SUPPORTING WALL MUST REST SLAB, ON THE HIGH SIDE OF THE STEP. 2 INTERIOR SECTION w rij(*D) DIMENSION VARIES ine 5"MIN. V CONCRETE SCREW DIMENSION VARIES 24"MIN. (FOUNDATION EDGE) • INSIDE EDGE OF POURED WALL) ® SIM. — B CONCRETE SCREW LOCATION, EXTERIOR 3 FLOATING SLAB DETAIL, STEP o 4z r�x 0� a zz oz a�4 O � a (CONCRETE SCREW) 0 Z � \ W 4 �D A (FOUNDATION EDGE)_ �`� 0 A z � �- O , / a GU V) co Co f� rid Q t o r 22„ ine > Date REF. • ��.:.'�:. 4/5/24 INTERIOR COLUMN" - r'd Drawn by— - —Y " (BASEPLATE) ine - �; : • : _ ' BRM _ wale CONCRETE SCREW 2" REF. 1/8„ = 1,-0„ Plan No. SEE FLOOR PLAN TO LOCATE CONCRETE SCREW ANCHOR TO BE ERECTOR 54717 B & ORIENTATE BASEPLATE & INSTALLED IN LIEU OF CAST —IN —PLACE ANCHOR Order No. " INTERIOR COLUMNS SCREWS. MINIMUM EMBEDMENT DEPTH -- (CONCRETE SCREW LENGTH) + j yy Sheet No. " C CONCRETE SCREW LOCATION, D CONCRETE SCREW, B 1 0 INTERIOR BASEPLATE SECTION, FOUNDATION EDGE 40 BY Date PART # INDEX PART # DESCRIPTION 5050020012 12ga. Interior base plate 5050020112 12ga. DBL. iamb, base plate 5050022218 18ga. DBL. iamb clip 5950000118 18ga. PT. support iamb 5950000318 18ga. PT. support iamb, 9'-4" 5950010418 18ga. support, BSW, 8'-7.75" EV. 5950015818 18ga. support, BSW, 9'-10.25" EV. 5950031118 18ga. PT. support iamb,8'-10" 5950031918 18ga. support, JAMB, 9'-3" EV. 5970000163 18ga. DBL. iamb, 8'-4", IWHT 5970000263 18ga. DBL. iamb, 9'-4", IWHT 5970020163 18ga. double iamb, 8'-10", IWHT 5987000018 18ga. PT. rake angle, 5' long 5990000116 16ga. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 57EV 5990000316 16ga. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 10'/EV 5990000516 16ga. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 15'/EV 5992000116 16ga. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 57EV 5992000316 16ga. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 10'/EV 5992010116 16ga. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 57EV 5992010316 16ga. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 10'/EV 5992010516 16ga. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 15'/EV 5992010716 16ga. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 207EV 5994000718 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 8-7.75EV 5994002918 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 9-10.25EV 5994010818 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 9-3EV (5987000018 NOTE: 3 HR BLOCK SIRE e e WAIL AT BLANK HIGH SIDE - D (5992010116 (5992010316 }\ (59920105161\� (5987000018 L (59920107161\\ L : - -4- - w DOOR - u SIDEWALL o) 5970000263) (5050022218) 4 (5950000318) 2 C1.0 C1.0 )*50020112) / 5050020012 01 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 25'-0" DINTERIOR WALL FRAMING ELEVATION, 1/4 11 PITCH LEAN-TO PARTITION PANEL NOT SHOWN, SEE PARTITION DETAILS 3 1 5 C1.0 }\ YQ / - (5990000516 -�- - Uj DOOR - �L3 u� BLANK t SIDEWALL J �p� SIDEWALL J! (5994010818) BLOCK rn FIREWALL � ,5970020163� (5950031918�--- (5050022218) 4 --(5950031118) 2 6 C1.0 C1.0 _ C .0 ::�(505002011112) / 5050020012 01 / BASE TRACK) ..� 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 20'-0" B INTERIOR WALL FRAMING ELEVATION, 1 /4" PITCH LEAN- TO PARTITION PANEL NOT SHOWN, SEE PARTITION DETAILS 01 PRIMARY CONCRETE ANCHOR INSTALLATION � PURLIN CONNECTIONS - 7". 9". 11 ". AND 12" WEB 1) USING THE PROPER DRILL BIT SIZE, DRILL A HOLE INTO THE BASE MATERIAL TO THE 7" (SHOWN) AND 9" PURLINS REQUIRE TWO BOLT CONNECTIONS ON EACH END. REQUIRED DEPTH. THE TOLERANCES OF THE DRILL BIT USED SHOULD MEET THE 11" AND 12" PURLINS REQUIRE THREE BOLT CONNECTIONS ON EACH END. REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI STANDARD B212.15. 2) REMOVE DUST AND DEBRIS FROM HOLE DURING DRILLING (E.G. DUST EXTRACTOR, 19 PARTITION SUPPORT AT BLANK WALL HOLLOW BIT) OR FOLLOWING DRILLING (E.G. SUCTION, FORCED AIR) TO EXTRACT LOOSE BLANK SIDEWALL PARTITION SUPPORT IS ONLY REQUIRED WHERE AN PARTICLES CREATED DURING DRILLING. INTERIOR PARTITION PANEL WALL INTERSECTS WITH THE BLANK SIDEWALL. 3)SELECT A TORQUE WRENCH OR POWERED IMPACT WRENCH AND DO NOT EXCEED THE REVIEW YOUR FLOOR PLAN FOR LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF BLANK MAXIMUM TORQUE, TINS OR TIMPACT,MAX RESPECTIVELY FOR THE SELECTED ANCHOR SIDEWALL SUPPORTS. THE BLANK SIDEWALL SUPPORT MAY NEED TO BE 4 PLCS COLUMN TABS OVERLAP DIAMETER AND EMBEDMENT. ATTACH AN APPROPRIATE SIZED HEX SOCKET/DRIVER TO FIELD CUT TO THE PROPER HEIGHT. INSULATED SIDEWALLS WILL USE A tructural THE IMPACT WRENCH. MOUNT THE SCREW ANCHOR HEAD INTO THE SOCKET. ZEE SHAPED SUPPORT, DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE SHOWN. SEE ine 4) DRIVE THE ANCHOR INTO THE HOLE UNTIL THE HEAD OF THE ANCHOR COMES INTO INSULATION DETAILS IF YOU HAVE INSULATED SIDEWALLS. SEE FLOOR CONTACT WITH THE FIXTURE. THE ANCHOR MUST BE SNUG AFTER INSTALLATION. DO NOT PLAN FOR PARTITION CHANNEL PART NUMBERS. SPIN THE HEX SOCKET OFF THE ANCHOR TO DISENGAGE. PURLIN tructural -ine ct i RAKE ANGL INTERIOR COLUMN, PURLIN, RAKE ANGLE CONNECTION NOTES: NOTE: RIGHT SIDE SHOWN, LEFT SIDE MIRROR THIS DETAIL. 1)SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR PROPER BASE PLATE AND COLUMN LOCATIONS. 760602 2) COLUMN OPENING SHOULD FACE NEAREST 'LOW' EAVE. 3) (1) PRIMARY ANCHOR REQUIRED AT EACH BASE PLATE, SUPPLIED BY TBS. 4) (1) SECONDARY ANCHOR (CONCRETE SCREW, POWDER ACTUATED, OR FIELD CUT HAMMER DRIVE) REQUIRED AT EACH BASE PLATE, 502840 SUPPLIED BY �o� ®o AS NEEDED Ja �SINTERIOR COLUMN<\re RAKE HEX HEAD BOLT HEX NUT ° ANGLE (BASE PLATE Ile 0truct / ine PRIMARY ANCHOR JAMB o 0 _�SUPPORT, SW) o (JAMB CLIP' 760300 SECONDARY ANCHOR 502840 BASE PLATE D 3 INTERIOR COLUMN/BASE PLATE JAMB/SUPPORT/RAKE ANGLE CONNECTION CONNECTION LL: w Of (5990000116)-\ (5990000316, NOTE: RIGHT SIDE SHOWN, LEFT SIDE MIRROR THIS DETAIL. (JAMB CLIP �L JAMB(SUPPORT, SW) ral ,/ 760110 CONCRETE SCREW) 01 760300 °� 2 PLCS 00 r ral 2 BBASE PLATE tructural ine 4 JAMB/SUPPORT/BASE PLATE CONNECTION rr 5 REVISION C1.0 / w o' _-^%_ R `JL-- BLANK SIDEWALL (5994002918�- BLOCK a' FIREWALL (5950015818�--- R - ••• (BASE TRACK ! 5'-0" 5 8111 C1.0 / LI / 7 (59920001161\\., (59920003161\,�, / _ - 4__ li w LL DOOR - L3 u� w BLANK W SIDEWALL _�� SIDEWALLvW (5994000718�-- BLOCK FIREWALL -oc) 00 � ,5970000163) (5950010418)-- (5050022218) 4---(5950000118) 2 g C1.0 C1.0 C1.0 9 5050020112� / 5050020012 Ol / 'BASE TRACK) / r°- 5'-0" _ 5'-O" 5'-0" 15'-0" DINTERIOR WALL FRAMING ELEVATION, 1/4 yl PITCH LEAN-TO PARTITION PANEL NOT SHOWN, SEE PARTITION DETAILS 39 EXTERIOR COLUMN dt NOTCH LAYOUT FOUNDATION SHOWN WITH A NOTCH. REFER TO FOUNDATION PLAN FOR ACTUAL FOUNDATION LAYOUT. INSTALL SILL PLATE SEALER (#102702) UNDER THE BASE TRACK AT ANY NO NOTCH BLANK WALL. BASE PLATE REFERENCE HOLES HOLES AT THE CENTER OF THE BASE PLATES ARE USED AS A AID TO LOCATE BASEPLATES ON THE STRUCTURAL LINES (CHALK LINES). NOTE: LEFT SIDE SHOWN, RIGHT SIDE MIRROR THIS DETAIL. NOTE: LEFT SIDE SHOWN, RIGHT SIDE MIRROR THIS DETAIL. NOTE: RIGHT SIDE SHOWN, LEFT SIDE MIRROR THIS DETAIL. tructural .{tructural /♦,SUPPORT, BW) tructural ne Line 1 9 tit ructural TRACKineine L\,EAVE/TOP)____1' RAKE FIELD CUT ANGLE AS NEEDED � COLUMN 760110 ® 760110 /\ ® o \ TRACK 760300 \ 760300 a��to NOTE: REFER TO SIDEWALL PAGE FOR INSTALLATION 760110 OF EAVE/TOP TRACK ® ® SUPPORT, BW 19 760300 COLUMN � /��g{SUPPORT� � COLUMN 760110 n � 760300 N\ �jV \ tructural Oj CONCRETE SCREW ine \� v , ■ tructural I ine 5 SIDEWALL COLUMN/RAKE ANGLE (DSIDEWALL COLUMN/BASE ANGLE 7 BLANK SIDEWALL COLUMN CONNECTION Q BLANK WALL CONNECTION Q BLANK WALL SUPPORT CONNECTION v U .c N, Ld 0 L U �cf)CL Z Q z QQ��°�°' L J O ; N Q� o cv m a E I o Ld U x m co k (b Q a_ W A z o A w x P a zz :4 i o U2 W A W P4 W c�z�, �D ~ o P� :a U 0 z W Pqv °� O E-! z a o � Date 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM Scale 1/2" = 1'-0" Plan No. 54717 B Order No. - - Sheet No. C 1 0 0 n FAF, 41 REVISION Date B PART # INDEX PART # DESCRIPTION 436312000 26ga. CNR. trim panel/panel, IWHT, 10'-0" 502840 screw, tapcon, 1 /4" x 1.25" 5050004014 14ga. purlin span clip 5050020412 12ga. STIR. iamb, base plate 5050022316 16ga. STIR. iamb clip 5911000214 14ga. EXT. wall base track 3.88" x 5' Ionq 5974000163 18ga. STIR. iamb, RH, 8'-4", IWHT 5985000218 18ga. EXT. girt, 4'-11 1 /4" Ionq 5987001018 18ga. PT. rake angle, 16' Ionq 5991000118 18ga. EW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 5'-0 /EV 5991010118 18ga. EW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 5'-0 /EV 5991010318 18ga. EW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 10'-0 /EV 5991010518 18ga. EW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 15'-0 /EV 5991010718 18ga. EW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 20'—O'/EV 5994000118 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 8-4EV 5994000718 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 8-7.75EV 5994002918 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 9-10.25EV 775203 breakaway clip for FW.,2"x2" 779051 26ga. FW. door trim, CRMB 779600 foam closure,3'-0"(r—pan out/a—pan ins) NOTE0 : 3 HR BLOCK FIRE WALL BLOCK WALL ON TOP OF STEM WALL 01 PRIMARY CONCRETE ANCHOR INSTALLATION * PURUN CONNECTIONS - 7". 9". 11 ". AND 12" WEB 1) USING THE PROPER DRILL BIT SIZE, DRILL A HOLE INTO THE BASE MATERIAL TO THE 7" (SHOWN) AND 9" PURLINS REQUIRE TWO BOLT CONNECTIONS ON EACH END. REQUIRED DEPTH. THE TOLERANCES OF THE DRILL BIT USED SHOULD MEET THE 11" AND 12" PURLINS REQUIRE THREE BOLT CONNECTIONS ON EACH END. REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI STANDARD B212.15. 2) REMOVE DUST AND DEBRIS FROM HOLE DURING DRILLING (E.G. DUST EXTRACTOR, 19 PARTITION SUPPORT AT BLANK WALL HOLLOW BIT) OR FOLLOWING DRILLING (E.G. SUCTION, FORCED AIR) TO EXTRACT LOOSE BLANK SIDEWALL PARTITION SUPPORT IS ONLY REQUIRED WHERE AN PARTICLES CREATED DURING DRILLING. INTERIOR PARTITION PANEL WALL INTERSECTS WITH THE BLANK SIDEWALL. 3)SELECT A TORQUE WRENCH OR POWERED IMPACT WRENCH AND DO NOT EXCEED THE REVIEW YOUR FLOOR PLAN FOR LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF BLANK MAXIMUM TORQUE, TINST MAX OR TIMPACT,MAX RESPECTIVELY FOR THE SELECTED ANCHOR SIDEWALL SUPPORTS. THE BLANK SIDEWALL SUPPORT MAY NEED TO BE DIAMETER AND EMBEDMENT. ATTACH AN APPROPRIATE SIZED HEX SOCKET/DRIVER TO FIELD CUT TO THE PROPER HEIGHT. INSULATED SIDEWALLS WILL USE A THE IMPACT WRENCH. MOUNT THE SCREW ANCHOR HEAD INTO THE SOCKET. ZEE SHAPED SUPPORT, DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE SHOWN. SEE 4) DRIVE THE ANCHOR INTO THE HOLE UNTIL THE HEAD OF THE ANCHOR COMES INTO INSULATION DETAILS IF YOU HAVE INSULATED SIDEWALLS. SEE FLOOR CONTACT WITH THE FIXTURE. THE ANCHOR MUST BE SNUG AFTER INSTALLATION. DO NOT PLAN FOR PARTITION CHANNEL PART NUMBERS. SPIN THE HEX SOCKET OFF THE ANCHOR TO DISENGAGE. 21 PARTITION SUPPORTS AT BLANK ENDWALL SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR LOCATIONS AND QUANTITY OF PARTITION SUPPORTS. ALIGN BOTTOM BOLT HOLE OF SUPPORT WITH BOTTOM GIRT OF ENDWALL. FIELD —CUT SUPPORT JUST BELOW PURLIN. SUPPORT WILL REQUIRE FIELD —NOTCHING TO ALLOW FOR THE TOP 04 LEAN-TO ENDWALL ELEVATIONS FASTENER CONNECTION. ACTUAL ENDWALL LAYOUT MAY MIRROR THIS ELEVATION. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR ACTUAL LAYOUT AND LOCATION OF HIGH SIDE. STARTER JAMBS ARE LEFT & RIGHT HANDED. IF CONSTRUCTING A MIRROR VIEW OF THIS ELEVATION USE THE OPPOSITE STARTER JAMB. STARTER JAMB PART NUMBERS ARE DIFFERENT BUT SIMILAR. SEE BILL OF MATERIAL FOR CORRECT PART NUMBER. 39 EXTERIOR COLUMN dt NOTCH LAYOUT 08 FIELD CUTTING FOUNDATION SHOWN WITH A NOTCH. REFER TO FOUNDATION PLAN FOR ACTUAL FOUNDATION LAYOUT. INSTALL SILL PLATE SEALER (#102702) PROVIDED COMPONENTS OFTEN REQUIRE FIELD CUTTING. TO ENSURE AN APPROPRIATE UNDER THE BASE TRACK AT ANY NO NOTCH BLANK WALL. APPEARANCE AND MINIMIZE CAULK REQUIRED, USE ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS AND QUALITY TOOLS FOR FIELD CUTS. SILL TRIM OFTEN REQUIRES NOTCHING TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH FASTENERS. LAP JOINTS SHOULD BE ARRANGED TO SHED WATER FROM OVERHEAD OR PREVAILING WIND DIRECTION. 02 SECONDARY CONCRETE ANCHORS (SUPPLIED dt INSTALLED BY OTHERS INSTALL SECONDARY ANCHORS (CONCRETE SCREW, POWDER ACTUATED, OR HAMMER DRIVE) 24" ON CENTER, AND STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. NOTE: SOME COMPONENTS. SUCH AS BASE TRACK. SPECIFICALLY REQUIRE BOTH PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ANCHORS. 08 FIELD CUTTING PROVIDED COMPONENTS OFTEN REQUIRE FIELD CUTTING. TO ENSURE AN APPROPRIATE APPEARANCE AND MINIMIZE CAULK REQUIRED, USE ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS AND QUALITY TOOLS FOR FIELD CUTS. SILL TRIM OFTEN REQUIRES NOTCHING TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH FASTENERS. LAP JOINTS SHOULD BE ARRANGED TO SHED WATER FROM OVERHEAD OR PREVAILING WIND DIRECTION. INSULATION FLAME AND SMOKE RATING THE COMPOSITE OF FIBERGLASS AND FACING SHALL HAVE SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS NOT TO EXCEED 25 FLAME SPREAD AND 50 SMOKE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES 723 TEST METHOD OR ASTM E-84 TEST METHOD. INSULATION BY OTHERS TO MEET OR EXCEED THESE REQUIREMENTS. 47 ROOF INSULATION INSULATION MUST STOP ON BOTH SIDES OF FIREWALL. INSULATION CANNOT RUN CONTINUOUS ACROSS TOP OF WALL. 56 BREAK AWAY CUPS CLIPS ATTACH TO STRUCTURAL MEMBERS WITH (1) #760600 SCREW, FOR BLOCK FIREWALL USE (1) TAPCON SCREW #502840. USE (2) #760615 TO FASTEN. 57 BLOCKWALL TERMINATION BLOCKWALL MUST RUN THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF BUILDING AND TERMINATE AT THE EXTERIOR A -PANEL OR JAMB. BLOCKWALL MUST RUN THE ENTIRE HEIGHT FROM THE FLOOR TO THE ROOF SHEETING. GROUT MUST BE USED TO FILL ANY VOIDS. PURLIN SPAN CUPS TWO PURLIN SPAN CLIPS ARE REQUIRED TO BUTT TO THE TRACKS OF A GYPSUM COVERED STUD FIREWALL. FOR BLOCK FIREWALLS TWO SPAN CLIPS WILL BUTT AT THE CENTER LINE OF THE BLOCK WALL AND SLOTS ARE TO BE CUT FOR THE FLANGES TO FIT IN AND GROUT MUST FILL ANY VOIDS UP TO THE ROOF LINE. LL_ w O I rn Wa 3C2 5987001018 08(5985000218 r_1F_ _ •� . I n I n l n n n 2,1_ 0„ 0C I� 2 1 C2. I I 1A 1 C2. LL_ 1 1 w �� (5991000118 DOOR �� 1 BLANK SIDEWALL 1 - SIDEWALL 5 �� (5994000118�.� C2.1-5994000718) 00 I (5050020412) (5050022316) 5994000718) (5974000163� r I 1 1 I I i (5911000214� 5'-0"- �� 5'-0" 5'-0" 15'—Opp BOTCHED BLANK ENDWALL ELEVATION, 1 /4" PITCH LEAN—TO (INTERIOR VIEW) (5985000218)— i n 'rr � BLANK - SIDEWALL *5987001018 3 4 ENDWALL PURLIN) C2 1 C2' n n n n n n 1 n "i n 2,- 0,P C� (5991010718) 775203 I I I I I 2 \\) �2, 5991010518� 5991010318) 51991010118) I � � 1 �I 1 1 I I (5994002918 _ I _ I (5994002918 , �' C2. 1 I r� I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 5911000214) 1 I I I I 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" _ 51-01) 5'-0" 25'-0„ 04 B NOTCHED BLANK ENDWALL ELEVATION, 1/4" PITCH LEAN—TO (INTERIOR VIEW) 01 Bearing & Nonbearing Wall Rating U904 - 3 HR Firewall Concrete Blocks - Various designs. Classification C-3 (3 hr). See Concrete Blocks category for lists of eligible manufacturers. Mortar - Blocks laid in full bed of mortar, nom. 3/8" thick, of not less than 2-1 /4" and not more than 3-1/2" parts of clean sharp sand to 1 part Portland Cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 percent hydrated lime (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. NOTE: TYPICAL CONNECTIONS AT OPPOSITE END MIRROR THIS DETAIL. NOTE: TYPICAL CONNECTIONS AT OPPOSITE END MIRROR THIS DETAIL. ° a GIRT a 0 a� a o 01 FASTENERS ( 43631*2000 BY OTHERS) ° 779051 � ° v 7 ° ° r d a d nn d d-A V ,Cjd ° a - BLOCK SIDEWALL COLUMN ---(SW COLUMN BLOCK ° (BASE ANGLE A —PANEL -(BASE PLATE ° BASE TRACK) \-�IENDWALL COLUMN) (BASE TRACK" STARTER JAMB) structural �ine BLOCK FIRE RESISTIVE BLOCK FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION SECTION A CONSTRUCTION SECTION 2 ENDWALL FIRE RESISTIVE BLANK SIDEWALL DOOR SIDEWALL CONSTRUCTION Q SIDEWALL *INSTALL INSULATION JLS"REF (GROUT FILLED FROM THE EXTERIOR = �/ WHEN POSSIBLE ROOF SHEETING (#14 x 7/8" 20 AC HEAD _ ®o (INSULATION*)47 ° ��5050004014,* ANGLE u ° ° (RAKE TRIM /° 502840 TOUCH UP PAINT (BREAKAWAY CLI4,4 FRC GIRT PURLIN SPAN (INT COLUMN) d n CLIP BLOCK 01 u d ° a ° d BLOCK a LI (BASE TRACK d d a � d SECTION OF BLOCK 3 EXTERIOR FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION *5050004014 (PURLIN ENDWALL COLUMNS BASE TRACK to "' e BLOCK 4 EXTERIOR BLOCK FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION a° Q d ° d d d a ° LRACK EW COLUMN) BLOCKFIRE RESISTIVE O CONSTRUCTION SECTION DETAIL 1A C2. DOOR w SIDEWALL 0' --(5994000118) • 0') (5050020412) (5050022316) 7_�5974000163) C � � n .L w z V) Q z p J o a 2, o cV m is 0,� 60 o o Ln E o w U x m co Ln o U Q ��roa � O 0 P4 4z zz0 a '—' a O W a a W A W U F o A z A a O CO a � o � Date 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM Scale 1 /2" = 1' — 0" Plcn No. 54717 B Order No. Sheet No. \1' i 42 REuisioN Date By� PART # INDEX PART # DESCRIPTION 5050020012 12aa. Interior base plate 5050020112 12aa. DBL. iamb, base plate 5050022218 18aa. DBL. iamb clip 5950000118 18aa. PT. support iamb 5950010418 18aa. support, BSW, 8'-7.75" EV. 5950031118 18aa. PT. support iamb,8'-10" 5950031918 18aa. support, JAMB, 9'-3" EV. 5970000163 18aa. DBL. iamb, 8'-4", IWHT 5970020163 18aa. double iamb, 8'-10", IWHT 5987000018 18aa. PT. rake angle, 5' Iona 5990000116 16aa. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 5'/EV 5990000316 16aa. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 10'/EV 5990000516 16aa. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 15'/EV 5992000116 16aa. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 5'/EV 5992000316 16aa. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 10'/EV 5992000516 16aa. interior column, 3.63" x 2", 15'/EV 5994000718 18aa. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 8-7.75EV 5994010818 18aa. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 9-3EV 01 PRIMARY CONCRETE ANCHOR INSTALLATION 1) USING THE PROPER DRILL BIT SIZE, DRILL A HOLE INTO THE BASE MATERIAL TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. THE TOLERANCES OF THE DRILL BIT USED SHOULD MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI STANDARD B212.15. 2) REMOVE DUST AND DEBRIS FROM HOLE DURING DRILLING (E.G. DUST EXTRACTOR, HOLLOW BIT) OR FOLLOWING DRILLING (E.G. SUCTION, FORCED AIR) TO EXTRACT LOOSE PARTICLES CREATED DURING DRILLING. 3)SELECT A TORQUE WRENCH OR POWERED IMPACT WRENCH AND DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM TORQUE, TiNST MAX OR TiMPACT,MAX RESPECTIVELY FOR THE SELECTED ANCHOR DIAMETER AND EMBEDMENT. ATTACH AN APPROPRIATE SIZED HEX SOCKET/DRIVER TO THE IMPACT WRENCH. MOUNT THE SCREW ANCHOR HEAD INTO THE SOCKET. 4) DRIVE THE ANCHOR INTO THE HOLE UNTIL THE HEAD OF THE ANCHOR COMES INTO CONTACT WITH THE FIXTURE. THE ANCHOR MUST BE SNUG AFTER INSTALLATION. DO NOT SPIN THE HEX SOCKET OFF THE ANCHOR TO DISENGAGE. BLOCK WAIL ON OF STEM TO WAS LL- W DOOR - u o SIDEWALL J I 00 C (5990000116,N\ (5970020163) (5050022218) -(5950031118) -(5050020112) �ne tural PT PANEL - SW SUPPORT SIDEWALL I COLUMN (2) ��PT PANEL �tn,ctura� /LJ LJne A —PANEL SW SUPPORT INSIDE ENDWALL CORNER TRIM COLUMN (1) -� GIRT A —PANEL D(VIEW TYP. INSIDE CORNER DETAIL MAY BE MIRRORED) 2 (5992000116� (5987000018, Ll (5990000316>-\\� U-1 DOOR - u SIDEWALL I � 00 5970000163) (5050022218) -(5950000118) r-s (5990000516}N 5'— 0" 25'-0" r-s _-4 --4-� (5994010818�—'- (5950031918�- 5'—O" VATION, 1 /4" PITCH LEAN-TO 12 SEE PARTITION DETAILS (5987000018 (5992000316� (59920005161\\ (5994000718�-t (5950010418)- 5'—O" BLANK SIDEWALL BLOCK FIREWALL BLANK SIDEWALL BLOCK FIREWALL C N o o ; .Q o Q E U) CO Z i o n cn J t � J Q a mLO W of U i p H xm -Q Lo a Q p �h p Ts Q / (5050020112) �015050020012 - �r . 0 5 —0 5 —0" 5 —0 5 —0„ CO a 20'-0" o Date C INTERIOR WALL FRAMING ELEVATION, 1/4 1) PITCH LEAN-TO PARTITION PANEL NOT SHOWN, SEE PARTITION DETAILS Drawn by Scale Plan No. Order No. \4 Sheet No. C2* 1 00/ OA O OC O OE O 03 STRAP CROSS BRACING 34 PURLIN ORIENTATION 07 EAVE SPAN CHANNEL FASTEN STRAP WITH (4) #12 X 1.25" SELF DRILLING SCREWS, P/N 760602, AT EACH THE PURLINS ARE ORIENTATED AS SHOWN. THE WEBS OF THE PURLIN AND WHEN INSTALLING THE EAVE SPAN CHANNELS START WITH A 5' CHANNEL FOLLOWED END. NOTE THE STRAPS MUST BE INSTALLED AFTER WALLS OR ROOF SECTIONS ARE INTERIOR COLUMN WILL FALL ON THE STRUCTURAL LINE. THE OPEN CAVITY WITH 10' AND END WITH A 5' EAVE SPAN CHANNEL. CHANNELS WILL OVERLAP AT EACH SQUARED & PLUMBED. ALL STRAPS ARE TO BE INSTALLED SO THEY ARE STRAIGHT & OF THE PURLIN AND INTERIOR COLUMN SHOULD FACE THE EAVE OF THE END. SPAN CHANNELS SHOULD START AND END AT THE MIDPOINT OF A BAY WHENEVER TIGHT (UNDER TENSION). REFER TO ROOF PLAN OR FLOOR PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION BUILDING POSSIBLE. SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN TO DETERMINE WHICH P/N'S TO START & END AND PLACEMENT OF ALL BRACING. WITH. INSTALL BOLTS TO SPAN CHANNELS THROUGH TOP TRACKS OR HEADERS ® 2'-0" OC. FIELD CUT EXCESS AT END OF RUN. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (5900000716 (5900000816) (590000II0816 07 5900000716 (5900000816) (5900000716 _ //1§00 2316' /6000000316) 03 478024000}-,,, . I --\\ i --{5987000018) /� �♦ f ' 6002002316) A 6001000316) ( 6000000316) oli�( 6000000316 P\, 6000000316 ) V---(5987000018) 6002002316) 6001000316) /6000000316) ---(5987000018) / 07 5900000116 I (5900000216) 6 J - NE MATCH._-- -- - --- 7 0121 22 23 24 25 26 27 C3. 28 29 30 C3. 31 32 (5900000716 (5900000816) 59D0000816) 5900000716) I 12 ( 5900000816) ( 5900000716 - �\ f/%—(5987000018) �( 600200?316) /(6000000316) 6002002316 - C3- — (5987000018) 6002002316)- 600„00'bQ316) 6000000316 ) PART # INDEX , �� I (478024000) PART # DESCRIPTION 1478024000 16ga. strap bracinq 20'-0" long ` i f(soo2oo231sF 15900000116 16ga. SW span channel 5'-0" lonq 15900000216 16ga. SW span channel 10'-0" lonq 3. _ 15900000716 16ga. hiqh side SW span channel 5'-0" lonq 8 � 15900000816 16ga. hiqh side SW span channel 10'-0" long \�� i f(s00200231s) 15987000018 18ga. PT. rake anqle, 5' lonq 16000000316 16ga. typical purlin, 7" x 3" x 10'-0" 16001000316 16ga. starter purlin, 7" x 3" x 9'-8" ,�� , �i `• C3. 16002002316 16ga. endwall purlin, 7" x 3" x 9'-5.5" ` `—� ( 590 000216) 5900000116 ) 1 310'-0" C3. 760602 ( DOOF CDOUBLE JAMB BASE PLATE (I V NOTE: tructural FIELD CUT RAKE ine ANGLE WHEN rNECESSARY 0 RAKE ANGLE Q DOOR JAMB CONNECTION DETAIL NOTE: 760602 TYPICAL BLANK SIDEWALL CONNECTION SHOWN. ALL SIDEWALL CONNECTION W/ MANSARD ARE SIMILAR. i ( TOP TRACK ! —(RAKE ANGLE) ROOF FRAMING PLAN FOR 81-4"/81-10"/9'-4" EAVE, 1 /4:12 PITCH, MINI STORAGE BUILDING A-1 NOTE: OPPOSITE SIDE MIRRORS THIS DETAIL 03 760602 I I (DOOR JAMB � �-(Rein etir_i �l 0 ( DOUBLE JAMB I �� BASE PLATE (STRAP BRACING I FIELD CUT ctural TO LENGTH CSIDEWALL ine COLUMN NOTE: FIELD CUT RAKE ANGLE / ORT�-/i WHEN NECESSARY PART. SUPP ttructural , tructural Line Line r r 2 RAKE ANGLE @ BLANK SIDEWALL 6 STRAP BRACING Q DBL JAMB CONNECTION DETAIL CONNECTION DETAIL NOTE: OPPOSITE SIDE MIRRORS THIS DETAIL 03 760602 I II (TOP CHANNEL I t � RAKE ANGLE) ctural ( STRAP BRACING i n e FIELD CUT \ TO LENGTH CBLANK SIDEWALLY / COLUMN / c` tructural ine r 7 STRAP BRACING SIDEWALL CONNECTION DETAIL NOTE: TYPICAL INTERIOR CONNECTION SHOWN, ENDWALL CONNECTION NOTE: ACTUAL LAYOUT MAY MIRROR THIS DETAIL. MIRRORS THIS DETAIL. PURLIN NOTE: SEE ROOF FRAMING PAGE FOR CORRECT PURLIN ORIENTATION. 03 760602 (STRAP BRACING I I Q /\ tructural / \ ine FIELD CUT I , ROOF STRAP I BRACING FIELD CUT TO LENGTH ine u y 8 STRAP BRACING @ PURLIN CONNECTION TO LENGTH STARTER JAMB RAKE ANGLE ( COLUMN � 11 STRAP BRACING Cam? DOOR/BLANK CORNER CONNECTION DETAIL *NOTE: ACTUAL LAYOUT MAY MIRRORS THIS DETAIL. (STRAP BRACING FIELD CUT TO LENGTH 07 AVE CHANNEL) RAKE ANGLE ( COLUMN REVISION 43 By Dote y y y y N 3 Ld cn Co CL a � o cf) J a -Tj 3 Ld 3 k m �0 3 = a Q) Ln o Q o o a a y y y z x o �z a zz a Oa E- 4 1-4 zw w U :a �0Az o 0 (� m co �i P o o q) � Date 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM Scale 1/8" = 1'-0" Plan No. 54717 B Order No. y Sheet No. 12 STRAP BRACING @ BLANK/BLANK C3oO CORNER CONNECTION DETAIL �J 44 /000 44V REVISION Date ' yt PART # INDEX PART # DESCRIPTION 436312000 26cia. CNR. trim panel/panel, IWHT, 10'-0" 779600 foam closure,3'-0"(r—pan out/a—pan ins) 01 PRIMARY CONCRETE ANCHOR INSTALLATION 1) USING THE PROPER DRILL BIT SIZE, DRILL A HOLE INTO THE BASE MATERIAL TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. THE TOLERANCES OF THE DRILL BIT USED SHOULD MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI STANDARD B212.15. 2) REMOVE DUST AND DEBRIS FROM HOLE DURING DRILLING (E.G. DUST EXTRACTOR, HOLLOW BIT) OR FOLLOWING DRILLING (E.G. SUCTION, FORCED AIR) TO EXTRACT LOOSE PARTICLES CREATED DURING DRILLING. 3)SELECT A TORQUE WRENCH OR POWERED IMPACT WRENCH AND DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM TORQUE, TINST MAX OR TIMPACT,MAX RESPECTIVELY FOR THE SELECTED ANCHOR DIAMETER AND EMBEDMENT. ATTACH AN APPROPRIATE SIZED HEX SOCKET/DRIVER TO THE IMPACT WRENCH. MOUNT THE SCREW ANCHOR HEAD INTO THE SOCKET. 4) DRIVE THE ANCHOR INTO THE HOLE UNTIL THE HEAD OF THE ANCHOR COMES INTO CONTACT WITH THE FIXTURE. THE ANCHOR MUST BE SNUG AFTER INSTALLATION. DO NOT SPIN THE HEX SOCKET OFF THE ANCHOR TO DISENGAGE. O6 STARTER BAY A STARTER BAY IS A BAY WHERE 2 ROWS OF COLUMNS FALL IN—BETWEEN THE 10' STRUCTURAL LINES OF THE FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT. TYPICAL 10' BAYS WILL ONLY HAVE ONE ROW OF COLUMNS WITHIN THE 10' STRUCTURAL LINES. THERE IS ALWAYS AT LEAST ONE 10' STARTER BAY. THERE MAY BE MORE THAN ONE IF YOUR BUILDING HAS CORRIDORS. THESE AREAS WILL BE MARKED AS A "STARTER BAY" ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND SIDE WALL PAGES. IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE STARTER BAY BE ERECTED CORRECTLY. 07 EAVE SPAN CHANNEL WHEN INSTALLING THE EAVE SPAN CHANNELS START WITH A 5' CHANNEL FOLLOWED WITH 10' AND END WITH A 5' EAVE SPAN CHANNEL. CHANNELS WILL OVERLAP AT EACH END. SPAN CHANNELS SHOULD START AND END AT THE MIDPOINT OF A BAY WHENEVER POSSIBLE. SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN TO DETERMINE WHICH P/N'S TO START & END WITH. INSTALL BOLTS TO SPAN CHANNELS THROUGH TOP TRACKS OR HEADERS ® 2'-0" OC. FIELD CUT EXCESS AT END OF RUN. 37 EXTRA DOOR CUP AND JOR GIRT O THE HIGH SIDE FOR ALL HIGH SIDES THAT EXCEED A 10'-0" EAVE HEIGHT THERE WILL BE AN EXTRA LINE OF GIRTS (#5985 ), DOUBLE JAMB CLIP (#5050022218) AND OR STARTER JAMB CLIP (#5050022316). THIS IS NOT SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS. THESE EXTRA PARTS WILL BE FASTENED THE SAME WAY AS THE OTHER CLIPS/GIRTS. 19 PARTITION SUPPORT AT BLANK WALL BLANK SIDEWALL PARTITION SUPPORT IS ONLY REQUIRED WHERE AN INTERIOR PARTITION PANEL WALL INTERSECTS WITH THE BLANK SIDEWALL. REVIEW YOUR FLOOR PLAN FOR LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF BLANK SIDEWALL SUPPORTS. THE BLANK SIDEWALL SUPPORT MAY NEED TO BE FIELD CUT TO THE PROPER HEIGHT. INSULATED SIDEWALLS WILL USE A ZEE SHAPED SUPPORT, DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE SHOWN. SEE INSULATION DETAILS IF YOU HAVE INSULATED SIDEWALLS. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR PARTITION CHANNEL PART NUMBERS. 01 Bearing & Nonbearing Wall Rating U904 - 3 HR Firewall Concrete Blocks - Various designs. Classification C-3 (3 hr). See Concrete Blocks category for lists of eligible manufacturers. Mortar - Blocks laid in full bed of mortar, nom. 3/8" thick, of not less than 2-1/4" and not more than 3-1/2" parts of clean sharp sand to 1 part Portland Cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 percent hydrated lime (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. 02 SECONDARY CONCRETE ANCHORS (SUPPLIED do INSTALLED BY OTHERS% INSTALL SECONDARY ANCHORS (CONCRETE SCREW, POWDER ACTUATED, OR HAMMER DRIVE) 24" ON CENTER, AND STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. NOTE: SOME COMPONENTS. SUCH AS BASE TRACK. SPECIFICALLY REQUIRE BOTH PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ANCHORS. 06 STARTER BAY A STARTER BAY IS A BAY WHERE 2 ROWS OF COLUMNS FALL IN—BETWEEN THE 10' STRUCTURAL LINES OF THE FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT. TYPICAL 10' BAYS WILL ONLY HAVE ONE ROW OF COLUMNS WITHIN THE 10' STRUCTURAL LINES. THERE IS ALWAYS AT LEAST ONE 10' STARTER BAY. THERE MAY BE MORE THAN ONE IF YOUR BUILDING HAS CORRIDORS. THESE AREAS WILL BE MARKED AS A "STARTER BAY" ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND SIDE WALL PAGES. JT IS CRITICAL THAT THE STARTER BAY BE ERECTED CORRECTLY, INSULATION FLAME AND SMOKE RATING THE COMPOSITE OF FIBERGLASS AND FACING SHALL HAVE SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS NOT TO EXCEED 25 FLAME SPREAD AND 50 SMOKE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES 723 TEST METHOD OR ASTM E-84 TEST METHOD. INSULATION BY OTHERS TO MEET OR EXCEED THESE REQUIREMENTS. 47 ROOF INSULATION INSULATION MUST STOP ON BOTH SIDES OF FIREWALL. INSULATION CANNOT RUN CONTINUOUS ACROSS TOP OF WALL. NOTE: LEFT EW SHOWN RIGHT EW WILL MIRROR THIS DETAIL NOTE: LEFT EW SHOWN RIGHT EW WILL MIRROR THIS DETAIL NOTE: LEFT EW SHOWN RIGHT EW WILL MIRROR THIS DETAIL t��'I'ntl tructural tructural (RAKEANGLE19 SUPPORT, BSW�- o ine STARTER JAMB) ine J. a 760300 GIRT -e 0 760110 (SW COLUMN �i a s o T (STARTER JAMB) 760300 ° ---(SW COLUMNS 19 SUPPORT, BSW) Ld •o JAMB CLIP i = 760110 - (SW COLUMN SPAN CHANNEL 07 '3 JAMB CLIP ° ) TRACK (SW COLUMNS) 11) CL Q ----(STARTER JAMB 0 Q i E o JAMB CLIP a Z Q o o 0 0 GIRT a 760110 760300 Q a° (SW COLUMN ° 760300 760110 760110 tructural � ° o �, BASE PLATE — 760300 >` ine ° N o % z::m cn �0e� o (SW COLUMNS a77- 760110 760300 `n ° 760110 760300 0 a a e a Ld c ® GIRT i '� NOTE: ONLY ONE BOLT TRACK e a m k ow,- REQUIRED AT EACH GIRT _ ° °' °_ o (SUPPORT, BSW) LOCATION TO BOLT 0 CONCRETE SCREW 01 1/9 COLUMNS TOGETHER. (CONCRETE SCREW Q o o Q 41 <J �irn uctural � SIDEWALL .� � °�i o o` / *<CONCRETE SCREW tructural 01\K tructural VIEW 11 erge ine ine )tr_uctural TRACK tructural ine ' true r cturaI tructural ine in tur A�ine- ine 1 STARTER JAMB TOP GIRT TO STARTER JAMB TRACK TO STARTER JAMB BLANK SW COLUMNS TO 2 3 4 5 BLANK SW COLUMNS TO 6 BLANK SW COLUMNS TO CONNECTION CONNECTION CONNECTION EAVE TRACK CONNECTION GIRT CONNECTION TRACK CONNECTION NOTE: RIGHT SW SHOWN LEFT SW WILL MIRROR THIS DETAIL NOTE: RIGHT SW SHOWN LEFT SW WILL MIRROR THIS DETAIL NOTE: ACTUAL ASSEMBLY MAY MIRROR THIS DETAIL NOTE: ACTUAL ASSEMBLY MAY MIRROR THIS DETAIL NOTE: ACTUAL ASSEMBLY MAY MIRROR THIS DETAIL TRACK „ 760300 t ru c t u ra Itruatural �truatural 760110 ° 760300 ne iine 760110 ! ined� SPAN CHANNEL 07 t( 07 EAVE SPAN CHANNEL � TRACK 07 ire 0 oh- 760110 \� ° 760300 E Ran PLAT. 0 0 (SPAN CHANNEL) VNIE�W A ---(SUPPORT, SW a W (SW COLUMN) COLUMN) (DOOR JAMB— < 0 760300 , ENDWALL (SW COLUMN)(SUPPORT, SW) HEADER = 760110 VIEW NOTE: THIS DETAIL SHOWS a a a THE HOLES TO USE WHEN 760300 NOTE: TEK SCREW IF BOLT HOLES ARE NOT 0 0 e a � NOTCHED FOUNDATION. 760110 AN OPTION a (DOOR JAMB—�� 760600 {SUPPORT, SW) / rruectural TRACK � � CONCRETE SCREW 01 ° NOTE: HEADERS ARE (CONCRETE SCREW a (JAMB CLIP �� ® <, ABOVE THETOP OF THE BASE PLATE) 760300 DOUBLE JAMBS WHEN �ORNER ne tural O � � �A�� %/ 760110 00 INSTALLANDED. TRACK 1 FIELD CUT SV�EENI (DOOR JAMB JAMBS FLUSH WITHSHOULD LINETOP UP 760600 �� ✓ HEADERS.. SIDEWCOLUMN TO EAVE TRACK VIEW ALL 7 BLANK SW TO 8 BLANK SW TO BLANK EW g BOTTOM OF DOOR JAMB TOP OF DOOR JAMB BLANK EW CONNECTION TRACK CONNECTION CONNECTION 1 CONNECTION DETAIL 11 DOOR JAMB CLIP DETAIL 12 CONNECTION DETAIL co z NOTE: NON—WINDLOCK DOOR BRACKET SHOWN. SEE NOTE: TYPICAL CONNECTIONS AT OPPOSITE END MIRROR THIS DETAIL. NOTE: TYPICAL CONNECTIONS AT OPPOSITE 0 A O WINDLOCK DETAIL WHEN MOUNTING WINDLOCK DOORS V a ` END MIRROR THIS DETAIL 771EAVE NSULATION 47 20 Ri � z � NOTE: TYPICAL DOOR JAMB SHOWN. ALL OTHER DOOR a4 ° ` a a ® GU x W JAMBS ARE SIMILAR CHANNEL TOP TRACK z z a a a ,__, (ROOF LINE ° SIDEWALL COLUMN) �/ BLOCK 01 E- a � O W ® (EAVE / D (77ssoo a �as ANGLEaa a aQ d a d g UPq z M � � A E- ti O z 436312000 (EAVE TRI�W A 0 --0 5/16-18 x 1 BOLT)* a a NOTE: GABLE SHOWN,�r a V) cy) �� a a a LEAN—TO SIMILAR. $ 0 � BLOCK — (BLOCK* ° o o SIDEWALL r a a a ' a�GROUT FILL TOP �o I Date COLUMN COURSE OF BLOCK I V 4/5/24 y �(TO ROOF LINE SW COLUMN) Q p � BASE TRACK 02 INT COLUMN Drawn by (BASE TRACK �a� BRM O ® m A—PANEL�s I < COLUMNS Scale BASE TRACK 02 BLOCK 01 a/_1 / 7f f 7f (DOOR JAMB)-- '"TEK—SCREW* ° r I ? BASE TRACK) � a .� 02 Plan No. 0 0 760110 * INCLUDED IN �' o o '� 54717 B DOOR HARDWARE tructural � 760300 L Order No. y PACKAGE BLOCK FIRE RESISTIVE ne tructural BASE TRACK 02 ��F" -- B DOOR BRACKET AND DOOR CONSTRUCTION SECTION SIDEWALL FIRE RESISTIVE i lrl2 BLOCK FIRE RESISTIVE Sheet No. y 19 JAMB CONNECTION DETAIL 31 BLANK SIDEWALL 32 CONSTRUCTION Q ENDWALL 33 SECTION OF EXTERIOR FIRE 34 TYPICAL COLUMN CONNECTION 35 CONSTRUCTION SECTION DETAIL RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION E1*0 45 REVISION ey� Date PART # INDEX PART # DESCRIPTION 5910000114 14ga. eave top track, 3.88" x 3.13" x 10' Iona 5911000114 14ga. EXT. wall base track 3.88" x 10' Iona 5985000118 18ga. EXT. Girt, 9'-11 1 /4" lonq 5985000318 18ga. EXT. Girt, 9'-8" Iona 5994000718 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 8-7.75EV 5994002918 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 9-10.25EV 5994010818 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 9-3EV 07 EAVE SPAN CHANNEL WHEN INSTALLING THE EAVE SPAN CHANNELS START WITH A 5' CHANNEL FOLLOWED WITH 10' AND END WITH A 5' EAVE SPAN CHANNEL. CHANNELS WILL OVERLAP AT EACH END. SPAN CHANNELS SHOULD START AND END AT THE MIDPOINT OF A BAY WHENEVER POSSIBLE. SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN TO DETERMINE WHICH P/N'S TO START & END WITH. INSTALL BOLTS TO SPAN CHANNELS THROUGH TOP TRACKS OR HEADERS ® 2'-0" OC. FIELD CUT EXCESS AT END OF RUN. 1 g PARTITION SUPPORT AT BLANK WALL BLANK SIDEWALL PARTITION SUPPORT IS ONLY REQUIRED WHERE AN INTERIOR PARTITION PANEL WALL INTERSECTS WITH THE BLANK SIDEWALL. REVIEW YOUR FLOOR PLAN FOR LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF BLANK SIDEWALL SUPPORTS. THE BLANK SIDEWALL SUPPORT MAY NEED TO BE FIELD CUT TO THE PROPER HEIGHT. INSULATED SIDEWALLS WILL USE A ZEE SHAPED SUPPORT, DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE SHOWN. SEE INSULATION DETAILS IF YOU HAVE INSULATED SIDEWALLS. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR PARTITION CHANNEL PART NUMBERS. 01 PRIMARY CONCRETE ANCHOR INSTALLATION 1) USING THE PROPER DRILL BIT SIZE, DRILL A HOLE INTO THE BASE MATERIAL TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. THE TOLERANCES OF THE DRILL BIT USED SHOULD MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI STANDARD B212.15. 2) REMOVE DUST AND DEBRIS FROM HOLE DURING DRILLING (E.G. DUST EXTRACTOR, HOLLOW BIT) OR FOLLOWING DRILLING (E.G. SUCTION, FORCED AIR) TO EXTRACT LOOSE PARTICLES CREATED DURING DRILLING. 3)SELECT A TORQUE WRENCH OR POWERED IMPACT WRENCH AND DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM TORQUE, TijWMAX OR TiMPACT,MAX RESPECTIVELY FOR THE SELECTED ANCHOR DIAMETER AND EMBEDMENT. ATTACH AN APPROPRIATE SIZED HEX SOCKET/DRIVER TO THE IMPACT WRENCH. MOUNT THE SCREW ANCHOR HEAD INTO THE SOCKET. 4) DRIVE THE ANCHOR INTO THE HOLE UNTIL THE HEAD OF THE ANCHOR COMES INTO CONTACT WITH THE FIXTURE. THE ANCHOR MUST BE SNUG AFTER INSTALLATION. DO NOT SPIN THE HEX SOCKET OFF THE ANCHOR TO DISENGAGE. 06 STARTER BAY A STARTER BAY IS A BAY WHERE 2 ROWS OF COLUMNS FALL IN—BETWEEN THE 10' STRUCTURAL LINES OF THE FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT. TYPICAL 10' BAYS WILL ONLY HAVE ONE ROW OF COLUMNS WITHIN THE 10' STRUCTURAL LINES. THERE IS ALWAYS AT LEAST ONE 10' STARTER BAY. THERE MAY BE MORE THAN ONE IF YOUR BUILDING HAS CORRIDORS. THESE AREAS WILL BE MARKED AS A "STARTER BAY" ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND SIDE WALL PAGES. JT IS CRITICAL THAT THE STARTER BAY BE ERECTED CORRECTLY. 37 EXTRA DOOR CUP ANDJOR GIRT O THE HIGH SIDE FOR ALL HIGH SIDES THAT EXCEED A 10'-0" EAVE HEIGHT THERE WILL BE AN EXTRA LINE OF GIRTS (#5985 ), DOUBLE JAMB CLIP (#5050022218) AND OR STARTER JAMB CLIP (#5050022316). THIS IS NOT SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS. THESE EXTRA PARTS WILL BE FASTENED THE SAME WAY AS THE OTHER CLIPS/GIRTS. 01 Bearing & Nonbearing Wall Rating U904 - 3 HR Firewall Concrete Blocks - Various designs. Classification C-3 (3 hr). See Concrete Blocks category for lists of eligible manufacturers. Mortar - Blocks laid in full bed of mortar, nom. 3/8" thick, of not less than 2-1/4" and not more than 3-1/2" parts of clean sharp sand to 1 part Portland Cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 percent hydrated lime (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. 02 SECONDARY CONCRETE ANCHORS (SUPPLIED St INSTALLED BY OTHERS) INSTALL SECONDARY ANCHORS (CONCRETE SCREW, POWDER ACTUATED, OR HAMMER DRIVE) 24" ON CENTER, AND STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. NOTE: SOME COMPONENTS, SUCH AS BASE TRACK, SPECIFICALLY REQUIRE BOTH PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ANCHORS. 06 STARTER BAY A STARTER BAY IS A BAY WHERE 2 ROWS OF COLUMNS FALL IN—BETWEEN THE 10, STRUCTURAL LINES OF THE FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT. TYPICAL 10' BAYS WILL ONLY HAVE ONE ROW OF COLUMNS WITHIN THE 10' STRUCTURAL LINES. THERE IS ALWAYS AT LEAST ONE 10' STARTER BAY. THERE MAY BE MORE THAN ONE IF YOUR BUILDING HAS CORRIDORS. THESE AREAS WILL BE MARKED AS A "STARTER BAY" ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND SIDE WALL PAGES. IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE STARTER BAY BE ERECTED CORRECTLY. INSULATION FLAME AND SMOKE RATING THE COMPOSITE OF FIBERGLASS AND FACING SHALL HAVE SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS NOT TO EXCEED 25 FLAME SPREAD AND 50 SMOKE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES 723 TEST METHOD OR ASTM E-84 TEST METHOD. INSULATION BY OTHERS TO MEET OR EXCEED THESE REQUIREMENTS. 47 ROOF INSULATION INSULATION MUST STOP ON BOTH SIDES OF FIREWALL. INSULATION CANNOT RUN CONTINUOUS ACROSS TOP OF WALL. BLOCK WALL ON TOP OF STEM WALL NOT SHOWN 4 _ 1.0 1 5910000114) .. �5910000114) \ • . / / 5910000114) .. 5910000114) � 1.0 = I _ O I L�.I = i � w (5994002918)--,. (5994002918 I/ _�' (, 5994002918)_�� (5994002918y--_,. Q �5994002918) �(5994002918) — —(5994002918) — (5994002918) LLI �(5994002918) LO BLOCK • • 5985000318) �5985000118) 5 (5985000118) e e (5985000118) e N _NDWALL� ... 1.0 .. 0 m 31 II 6 1.0 �-( 5911000114) � 5911000114) 5911000114) 5911000114 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" ATC 34 /33\ I 1 0 E1.0 5910000114� 5910000114) 5910000114) 5910000114 I I I I I I I 0 .. LLI _ ( 5994010818>--� ( 5994010818 � ( 599401�0818( 5994010818� j —� 5994010818� �( 5994010818)---� 5994010818� �� 5994010818 W v 5985000118) 5985000118) 5985000118) 5985000118 I I I � I I I I I I I I I 5911000114) 5911000114 5911000114) 5911000114 I 1 10'-012 10'-012 -' 10'-0" -M 10'-0" ATC I I U .c 0 vi CL �° O Z L 4 c p L CO L i J O m 2 Q� a c E o w U 3 k m co 3 a�-QL0 o� c) Q H : 5910000114) 5910000114 5910000114) 5910000114) � Z O O O O 4 > 32 Zzx W 1.0 � Ow aM WA Wa a 5994000718)—�, (5994000718)--_,.. (5994000718)-___'..' 5994000718) (5994000718)--� — w W 0 Z ---(5994000718)— (5994000718) — �5994000718) (5994000718 Q 4 O A O A Iq U) CYJ 51 ~ U2 (5985000118� a (5985000118� a (5985000118) (5985000318 BLOCK LO ENDWALL I-, Date 4/5/24 I 35 31 00 Drawn by BRM I Scale 5911000114) 5911000114) 5911000114) 5911000114 1/2" = 1 — 0 22 Y y .�.. � Plan No. 54717 B 101-0" — 101-011 —_ 101-0)l —_ 101-011 �_ Order No. -- y —� Sheet No. y UA SIDEWALL ELEVATION (INTERIOR VIEW) E1*1 (TYP. SIDEWALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN. LENGTH MAY VARY) 0/ PART # INDEX PART # DESCRIPTION 5050020112 12ga. DBL. iamb, base plate 5050020412 12ga. STR. iamb, base plate 12 19 C 5050022218 18ga. DBL. iamb clip 5050022316 16ga. STR. iamb clip 5050022418 18ga. STR. iamb clip at step 5950000118 18ga. PT. support iamb (5050020112 (5050020112 5950000318 18ga. PT. support iamb, 9'-4" \� 5950031118 18ga. PT. support iamb,8'-10" �59550001163 �5955000163 5955000163 18ga. SW / EW header, 9'-0", IWHT (5955000263� ) )L 5955000163) \-(5955000263) 5955000263 18ga. SW / EW header, 8'-8", IWHT 5955000763 18ga. SW / EW header, 8'-0", IWHT ��(5ss4000118) 11 5970000163 18ga. DBL. iamb, 8'-4", IWHT 1 0 r ° 597000026318ga. DBL. iamb, 9'-4", IWHT (5050022418� 5970020163 18ga. double iamb, 8'-10", IWHT a • \ 7 5974000163 18ga. STR. iamb, RH, 8'-4", IWHT �---(5050022316) (5050022218 I (5050022218) 5974000263 18ga. STR. iamb, LH, 8'-4", IWHT BLOCK ENDWALL _ 597400036318ga. STR. iamb, RH, 9'-4", IWHT " 5974000463 18ga. STR. iamb, LH, 9'-4", IWHT --(5974000463) (597000o263}a - (5970000163) (5974000363)--- 5974050163 18ga. starter iamb, RH, 8'-10", IWHT 00 5950000318)-I- *5950000118) 597405026318ga. starter iamb, LH, 8'-10", IWHT 5994000118 18ga. BSW column, 3.63" x 1.5", 8-4EV ` ` I I 01 PRIMARY CONCRETE ANCHOR INSTALLATION 8' - 8" F. 0. \ - / 9' - 0" F. 0. 9' - 0" F. 0. 9' - 0" F. 0. 8' - 8" F. 0. 1) USING THE PROPER DRILL BIT SIZE, DRILL A HOLE INTO THE BASE MATERIAL TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. THE TOLERANCES OF THE DRILL BIT USED SHOULD MEET THE 10 REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI STANDARD B212.15. - 2) REMOVE DUST AND DEBRIS FROM HOLE DURING DRILLING (E.G. DUST EXTRACTOR, / 1.0 HOLLOW BIT) OR FOLLOWING DRILLING (E.G. SUCTION, FORCED AIR) TO EXTRACT LOOSE 5050020412) (5050020112 }� (5050020112 (5050020412 PARTICLES CREATED DURING DRILLING. a s i r- 77 r- 7 3)SELECT A TORQUE WRENCH OR POWERED IMPACT WRENCH AND DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM TORQUE, TINST MAX OR TIMPACT,MAX RESPECTIVELY FOR THE SELECTED ANCHOR DIAMETER AND EMBEDMENT. ATTACH AN APPROPRIATE SIZED HEX SOCKET/DRIVER TO 10'-0" 10'-O" i 10'-O" 1O'-0" 1O'-0" THE IMPACT WRENCH. MOUNT THE SCREW ANCHOR HEAD INTO THE SOCKET. 4) DRIVE THE ANCHOR INTO THE HOLE UNTIL THE HEAD OF THE ANCHOR COMES INTO I CONTACT WITH THE FIXTURE. THE ANCHOR MUST BE SNUG AFTER INSTALLATION. DO NOT SPIN THE HEX SOCKET OFF THE ANCHOR TO DISENGAGE. 06 STARTER BAY A STARTER BAY IS A BAY WHERE 2 ROWS OF COLUMNS FALL IN-BETWEEN THE 10' STRUCTURAL LINES OF THE FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT. TYPICAL 10' BAYS WILL ONLY HAVE ONE ROW OF COLUMNS WITHIN THE 10' STRUCTURAL LINES. THERE IS ALWAYS AT LEAST ONE 10' STARTER BAY. THERE MAY BE MORE THAN ONE IF YOUR BUILDING HAS CORRIDORS. THESE AREAS WILL BE MARKED AS A "STARTER BAY" ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND SIDE - WALL PAGES. JT IS CRITICAL THAT THE STARTER BAY BE ERECTED CORRECTLY. V ATC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 PARTITION SUPPORT AT DOOR SIDEWALL DOOR SIDEWALL PARTITION SUPPORT IS NEEDED AT EVERY DOUBLE JAMB ALONG THE SIDEWALL. THE SIDE FLANGE OF THE SUPPORT WILL ALWAYS FALL ON THE STRUCTURAL LINE. THE SUPPORT WILL BE ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STRUCTURAL LINE AS THE INTERIOR COLUMNS. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR CORRECT ORIENTATION. I 07 C EVE SPAN CHANNEL CHANNEL ��_ l� WHEN INSTALLING THE EAVE SPAN CHANNELS START WITH A 5' _ _ L= L= J I� J .. ► L; E m CHANNEL FOLLOWED WITH 10' AND END WITH A 5' EAVE SPAN CHANNEL. CHANNELS WILL OVERLAP AT EACH END. SPAN CHANNELS I 5050020112) SHOULD START AND END AT THE MIDPOINT OF A BAY WHENEVER � POSSIBLE. SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN TO DETERMINE WHICH P/N'S TO START & END WITH. INSTALL BOLTS TO SPAN CHANNELS THROUGH TOP (5955000263y/ 5955000163 5955000163� (5955000163 �5955000263) TRACKS OR HEADERS 02 -0 OC. FIELD CUT EXCESS AT END OF RUN. DOUBLE JAMB BASE CUP HEADER I � I I I I I DOUBLE JAMB) I � I I I I I I I -4-- SIDEWALL JAMB) SUPPORT J I I DOOR JAMB) � �DOUBLE JAMBI BASE CUP 11 C TYP. DOOR SW SECTION DOUBLE JAMB '\- C BASE CUP a me �DOU CUPBLE JAMB SIDEWALL JAMB) ` SUPPORT J _/ -(DOOR JAMB) DOUBBASE CUP MBl J D DOOR JAMB SUB -ERECTION DETAIL L C > C > C C � 505002241 8) ---(5050022218) O - � 5974050263) �p-(5970020163) (597405016300 - -�5950031118 20 L ° �(5050022418) C > C > C > C > 8'-8" F. 0. _ _ 9'-0" F. 0. _ 9'-0" F. 0. _ _ 9- 0" F.O. _ 8'-8" F. 0. _ 5050020412) 5050020112) (5050020412 F -1 F -1 r = 10 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 10)_011 ATC = 19 12 C _J __j w 5050020112) "I I� 5050020112) (5955000263) / (5955000163� (5955000163� (5955000163� 11 �5955000763) �5050022218) _ (5050022218) I I I I---(5974000163)--(5970000163) " I ----(5970000163) O 00 • 5950000118 20 " I - (5950000118 20 '.*'�5050022418) 8'-8" F. 0. 9'-0" F. 0. 9'-0" F. 0. 9'-0" F. 0. - " 8'-0" F. 0. 10 5050020412) 5050020112) 5050020112) *>STARTER BAY , 101- 0" 10'- 0" 10'- 0" 10'- 0" 10'- 0" A SIDEWALL ELEVATION (INTERIOR VIEW) (TYP. SIDEWALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN. LENGTH MAY VARY) 46 REVISION ey� Date y y y y y U c r\ Ld Cf) CL o ZL o cv m a c E I o w 6 x m co y -1 v) --a xO O O <4z - zz�� w E � a 4 w ( 5994000118)---- ° (5050022316y--~ U Z M A E- BLOCK a �ENDWALL � O Co 0 A (5974000263)--- co cy) o � Date _ 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM = Scale 1/2" = 1'-0" (5050020412)-\ Plan No. 54717 B a Order No. y Sheet No. y E1*2 PART # INDEX PART # DESCRIPTION 5045010026 26ga. eave trim (dsw). 10'-2". MBLK 5045012163 26ga. batten trim. 10' Iona. IWHT 5050020412 12aa. STR. iamb, base plate 5050022418 18aa. STR. iamb cliD at step 5900000216 16aa. SW span channel 10'-0" Iona 5900000816 16aa. high side SW span channel 10'-0" Iona 5920004326 26ga. H.S. facet eavetrim (bsw). MBLK (BATTEN TRIM FASTEN BATTEN 2 PLCS TYP. WITH COLORED T" SCREWS AT O TOP /BOTTOM AND EACH JAMB CUP MINIMUM. (STR JAMB�— LOW SIDE (DOOR CLIP / 0. i .ON 01 PRIMARY CONCRETE ANCHOR INSTALLATION 1) USING THE PROPER DRILL BIT SIZE, DRILL A HOLE INTO THE BASE MATERIAL TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. THE TOLERANCES OF THE DRILL BIT USED SHOULD MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI STANDARD B212.15. 2) REMOVE DUST AND DEBRIS FROM HOLE DURING DRILLING (E.G. DUST EXTRACTOR, HOLLOW BIT) OR FOLLOWING DRILLING (E.G. SUCTION, FORCED AIR) TO EXTRACT LOOSE PARTICLES CREATED DURING DRILLING. 3)SELECT A TORQUE WRENCH OR POWERED IMPACT WRENCH AND DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM TORQUE, TINST MAx OR TIMPACT.MAx RESPECTIVELY FOR THE SELECTED ANCHOR DIAMETER AND EMBEDMENT. ATTACH AN APPROPRIATE SIZED HEX SOCKET/DRIVER TO THE IMPACT WRENCH. MOUNT THE SCREW ANCHOR HEAD INTO THE SOCKET. 4) DRIVE THE ANCHOR INTO THE HOLE UNTIL THE HEAD OF THE ANCHOR COMES INTO CONTACT WITH THE FIXTURE. THE ANCHOR MUST BE SNUG AFTER INSTALLATION. DO NOT SPIN THE HEX SOCKET OFF THE ANCHOR TO DISENGAGE. (SS -ROOF rn I 5900000216) I I 5900000216 5045010026) I I (HEADER HEADER I ( 5045012163 I I I ( STR JAMB (HIGH SIDE OF STEP) I \ STR JAMB _ (LOW SIDE OF STEP) I 6" I I OR LESS STEP i I EXTERIOR ELEVATION q STEP AT DOOR SIDEWALL ELEVATION STR JAMB) HIGH SIDE (SUPPORT, SW) BASE PLATE) CONCRETE SCREW) / 01 tructural _ine o� STR JAMB CONNECTION @ STEP ( SW COLUMN) — HIGH SIDE ( SW COLUMN LOW SIDE 760300 f/ 760110 °� TRACK a R) a o -'o �\ CONCRETE SCREW 01 0 �tl rue alne BLANK SW COLUMN AND TRACK @ STEP is Q 3 I I I 8 ,e 9B E I I/F m .I TEK SCREWY I THIS SIDE I I 2 2, I (SUPPORT, BW) t (HIGH SIDE) 1\L m � 5050022418) (5050022418 / — 5050020412) 1 E 2' I TEK SCREW THIS SIDE INTERIOR ELEVATION @ SW �a w co J H 0_ N O NOTE: KEEP THESE SCREWS AS CLOSE TO THE LIP OF THE STARTER JAMB AS POSSIBLE. THE BATTEN STRIP WILL COVER THESE SCREWS. USE 760600 2 PLCS TYP. AT TOP / BOTTOM AND EACH JAMB CLIP MINIMUM. RAKE ANGLE PURLIN ----(INT COLUMN) 6 2. BASE PLATE ro RAKE ANGLE PURLIN TNT COLUMN, _ l - (BASE PLATE OSTEP AT INTERIOR WALL ELEVATION (STR JAMB) — LOW SIDE o0o'(DOOR CLIP) (SUPPORT, SW) STIR JAMB) HIGH SIDE ol 760110 760300 2 STARTER JAMB CLIPS @ STEP 2A W "� / 760300 �aa �%� 760110 �f 760600 -(SW COLUMN HIGH SIDE (SW COLUMN - LOW SIDE SW COLUMNS AND GI R TS @ STEP (SS -ROOF U % < 5900000816� (5920004326 BLOCK WALL ON TOP OF STEM WALL (TOP TRACK (SW COLUMN - (LOW SIDE) GIRT (SW COLUMN) (HIGH SIDE) I 2A I (SUPPORT, BW) ,z• (HIGH SIDE) I I 1A 2 BASE TRACK) I I I I 6" /,i OR LESS\ — — — STEP EXTERIOR ELEVATION INTERIOR ELEVATION @ SW q� FOUNDATION STEP AT BLANK SIDEWALL ELEVATION c� ptructural Line 00 (PARTITION PANEL) JAMB 1 ��INT COLUMN CLIP / R76WO110--_�BASE PLATE ----- - 0 1 STEP HEIGHT �� FLOOR ----------------- O O SEE FOUNDATION J structural PLAN FOR TYPICAL �ine DETAILS & NOTES. 6 TYPICAL FOUNDATION STEP AT WALL v e 7606 (5' RAKE ANGLE �� A STR "I,, STEP FIELD CUT VERTICAL o LEG IF NEEDED 760110 760300 (SUPPORT, SW 0o V (STARTER JAMB o ---(STARTER JAMB 3 RAKE ANGLE @ STEP CONNECTION DETAIL REVISION C m � oN�' 23 3 w 00 cn ��`O a °�°' - m 'tn -is 0, 10 o o, Z3 E I o w U 3 k OJ :� �D 3 = O N N Q Ln O Q o o a a y y y x O O zzlx O Z �aav�0 w W A W a w�Z� �xraz a O o o � Date 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM Scale 1 /2„ = 1, _ 0„ Plan No. 54717 B Order No. Sheet No. y � E2*0 48 REVISION Dote By� g tructural VO I ine 12 PART # INDEX 1/4 PART # DESCRIPTION -------------- 308211900 29aa. PT. panel, 9'-11" long -------------- rt--------------- I 308217200 29aa. PT. panel, 14'-4" long 'I 308217900 29aa. PT. panel, 14'-11" Iona (308217200} _I •I 308223300 29aa. PT. panel, 19'-5" Iona i- o •I v w I I I I I I I a � •I I'I 00 r r � (308217200 I. I.I n �.I II.II I I I• I Co 00 I I• I I II II I I• I (308217200� II IF I� S GALVALUME PANEL I I 'I Ili I STRUCTURAL BEARING LEG I I III 31" = _4"_ _4" 4" REF. TYP. 14'-4" PANEL LENGTH 15'-0" REF. 1'-0" 1'-0" 1'-011 3'-0" COVERAGE REF. A TRANSVERSE PANEL LAYOUT 8'-4" EAVE, 15' WIDE LEAN-TO TRACH TE PARTITION PANEL PROFILE tructural 6 I ine 12 VO 1i4I o� vi o "1N3� o t�----- ---------------— -------------- �08211900) _ a------------- . ' (308223300) E CL (3)�� N Ld m E c .� II I H x I' T I•I I (308211900) I� Uo' ,c o (308223300} oi 000 ac ai ;. 7 I II I 7 00 [308211900) (30822330 _ • I i � I I• I II II I I I 1 1 '� II 32" 19'-5" PANEL LENGTH REF. TYP. 20'-0" REF. NOTE: WHEN CONSTRUCTING AN INTERIOR PANEL WALL IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO FLIP THE TOP PANEL. THIS WILL ALLOW THE atwa LOAD BEARING LEG TO REST ° AGAINST THE RAKE ANGLE. WE DO NOT RECOMMEND ATTACHING TH PARTITION PANEL TO THE RAKE ANGLES. OOLUMN AT O�VFRLAP MAIL 76D600 IF INSULATED, 760800 ONE SIDE 710969 OTHER SIDE PANEL 29 ga. GALVANIZED (LENGTH VARIES) LOAD BEARING LEG I ° FOUNDATION 4,, 1 PARTITION PANEL FASTENING DETAIL 6 ATTENTION: Partition wall panel lengths were determined with the panel starting at least 3)j" in from the sidewall. All buildings 25' or more will have 2—panels that lap at a interior column line. The panels should overlap at least by 1". S11, PARTITION l PANEL j 7sosoo SUPPORT} or BLANK WALLI COLUMN // COLUMN ® EW DARTITION l DANEL J 7sosoo SUPPORT a sw BLANK SIDEWALL or ENDWALL DOOR SIDEWALL or ENDWALL O PARTITION PANEL EXTERIOR CONNECTION B TRANSVERSE PANEL LAYOUT 8'-4" EAVE, 25' WIDE LEAN-TO 6 tructural VO I ine 12 1 /4 n F - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - I II I (308217900� _' 308211900) I•I I I � I I•I I I I.I I•I '•I I.I I . II II 'I II I II I j•j I•I II•I j•j I • �� (308217900} - 1 III I' 308211900) o I �� II II III II � I °' 0)I•I I•I II.I 7 I II II III II I•I I I I I•I I I I I•I •I I I• I >-1 _ 1 1 308211900} (308217900 1 _i—�� I I I I I• i I I 1 I 1 I • II I I I I I I•I I I I I•I I•I I• I•I _ II I Y_ 32» 14'-11" PANEL LENGTH 22" REF. OVERLAP REF. TYP. � - 25'-0" REF. C TRANSVERSE PANEL LAYOUT 9'-4" EAVE, 25' WIDE LEAN-TO W A a x z �z 0 E- ha�� a W Qom' O o U � A � :a o z w E1 i ��° 0 z O � o � Date 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM Scale 1/2" = 1'—C Plan No. 54717 B Order No. Sheet No. � F 1 * 0 J ON /00 TEMPORARILY FASTEN EAVE TRIM WITH 2—SCREWS. PLACE SCREWS WITH CONSIDERATION AS TO WHERE ROOF CLOSURES AND FASTENERS WILL BE INSTALLED LATER. BACK SCREW THE BOTTOM OF THE TRIM TO CLOSE THE GAPS. BE SURE TO HIT THE LIP OF THE TRIM. ROOF PANEL) 760600 ®_INSIDE ROOF CLOSURE 2—PLCS i (REFER TO ROOF PAGE) FACET TRIM jo O EAVE TOP TRACK EAVE SPAN CHANNEL 0 " O O 760600 COLOR—M_ATCHING SCREW BACK SCREW 3'-0" O.C. WITH RUBBER WASHER ( DOOR SIDEWALL *EAVE TRIM #12-14 X 3/4" HEADER) COLOR —MATCHING SCREW *NOTE: EAVE TRIM TELESCOPES o JAMB OUTSIDE CLOSURE WITH THE LEES END A —PANEL SIDEWALL COLUMN OPENING BEING THE LARGER SIZE. INSTALL � o LEFT TO RIGHT. PART #INDEX PART # DESCRIPTION 322619200 rake trim, MLBK, 16'-0" Iona 376312000 26aa. CNR. trim panel/frame. IWHT, 10'-0" 436312000 26aa. CNR. trim panel/panel. IWHT, 10'-0" 5045010026 26aa. eave trim (dsw), 10'-2", MBLK 5920004326 26aa. H.S. facet eavetrim (bsw), MBLK 04 LEAN—TO ENDWALL ELEVATIONS ACTUAL ENDWALL LAYOUT MAY MIRROR THIS ELEVATION. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR ACTUAL LAYOUT AND LOCATION OF HIGH SIDE. STARTER JAMBS ARE LEFT & RIGHT HANDED. IF CONSTRUCTING A MIRROR VIEW OF THIS ELEVATION USE THE OPPOSITE STARTER JAMB. STARTER JAMB PART NUMBERS ARE DIFFERENT BUT SIMILAR. SEE BILL OF MATERIAL FOR CORRECT PART NUMBER. 07 EAVE SPAN CHANNEL WHEN INSTALLING THE EAVE SPAN CHANNELS START WITH A 5' CHANNEL FOLLOWED WITH 10' AND END WITH A 5' EAVE SPAN CHANNEL. CHANNELS WILL OVERLAP AT EACH END. SPAN CHANNELS SHOULD START AND END AT THE MIDPOINT OF A BAY WHENEVER POSSIBLE. SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN TO DETERMINE WHICH P/N'S TO START & END WITH. INSTALL BOLTS TO SPAN CHANNELS THROUGH TOP TRACKS OR HEADERS ® 2'-0" OC. FIELD CUT EXCESS AT END OF RUN. 08 FIELD CUTTING PROVIDED COMPONENTS OFTEN REQUIRE FIELD CUTTING. TO ENSURE AN APPROPRIATE APPEARANCE AND MINIMIZE CAULK REQUIRED, USE ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS AND QUALITY TOOLS FOR FIELD CUTS. SILL TRIM OFTEN REQUIRES NOTCHING TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH FASTENERS. LAP JOINTS SHOULD BE ARRANGED TO SHED WATER FROM OVERHEAD OR PREVAILING WIND DIRECTION. SILL TRIM LAP JOINT DIRECTIONS WHEN JOINING SILL TRIM TO SILL TRIM OVERLAP PARTS 2" MAX. ADD SEALANT TO LAP JOINT OF SILL TRIMS. *MINOR RIB TAPE SEALER NOT REQUIRED AT HIGH EAVE IF FACET TRIM IS INSTALLED* 1 1 /2" O.C. #14 X 7/8" COLOR —MATCHING TRI—BEAD SCREW WITH RUBBER WASHER, TAPE SEALER 0'-6" O.C. OUTSIDE CLOSURE SSR PANEL EAVE SPAN CHANNEL 5A HIGH EAVE CONNECTIONS BLANK SIDEWALL, SSR STARTER JAMB STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS tructural ine FOAM CLOSURE RIVET EXTERIOR WALL PANEL 36" O.C. 1 1/4" COLOR MATCHING SCREW CORNER TRIM 6 DOOR SIDEWALL/EAVE TRIM CONNECTION DETAIL ROOF OVERHANG AT EAVE TRIM —BUILDING WITH GUTTER: 1-1/2" BEYOND FACE OF EAVE TRIM, SEE GUTTER PAGE FOR RAKE TRIM TERMINATION —BUILDING WITHOUT GUTTER: 4" TO 6" BEYOND FACE OF EAVE TRIM, TERMINATE END OF ZACK TRIM AT THE END OF ROOF SHEET .a. \ sb Oc ROOF SHEET)--\ WALL PANEL SHOULD NOT EXTEND BEYOND FACE OF JAMB. FIELD —CUT CORNER TRIM TO APPROPRIATE HEIGHT, SOME SITUATIONS MAY REQUIRE FIELD —NOTCHING. FASTEN CORNER TRIM TO UNDERLYING PANEL/JAMB WITH COLOR MATCHING RIVETS. ENSURE CORNER TRIM IS PLUMB. 13 EXTERIOR PANEL/JAMB, OUTSIDE 29 CORNER TRIM CONNECTION RAKE TRIM W/ENDCAP "-EAVE TRIM EAVE TRIM AND RAKE TRIM CONNECTION DETAIL I (5045010026� r EAVE SPAN 07 CHANNEL HEADER) (DOUBLE JAMB ROLL —UP DOOR ) EAVE SPAN �5045010026) __29► (5920004326 07 CHANNEPAN TOP CHANNEL CHANNEL i I 2. I HEADER) I GIRT I' (STARTER JAMB 41 I I 13 BLOCK FIRE WALL GIRT ROLL —UP DOOR) I I j(376312000) I BLOCK j ~ENDWALL ( BASE TRACK I I I I I �tructural �ne A DOOR FRAME SIDEWALL W/ BLANK ENDWALL ELEVATION (43 ) COLORED SIDE EXTERIOR 26GA. WALL PANEL TRIM WALL PANEL SO IT DOES NOT EXTEND BEYOND 1 r FROM THE STRUCTURAL LINES. FIELD CUT TRIM PIECE TO DESIRED HEIGHT. SOME SITUATIONS MAY REQUIRE FIELD NOTCHING. DRILL & RIVET THE TRIM IN PLACE WITH MATCHING COLORED RIVITS. THE CORNER TRIM SHOULD BE PLUMB. EXTERIOR CORNER TRIM BLANK SIDEWALL & ENDWALL 12 FASTENING DETAIL 5A 07 EAVE SPAN 2.0 CHANNEL BLOCK FIRE WALL 5920004326) 29A \ 2. � II I � 12 I' 2.0 — �436312000) BLANK ENDWALL tructural tructural �ne 'ne r B BLOCK SIDEWALL PANEL W/BLANK ENDWALL ELEV (HIGH SIDE) (WITH GUTTER AT LOW SIDE) EAVE (322619200 ANGLE -- — — — — — — � (376312000)--- DOOR SIDEWALL i BLOCK FIRE WALL 25'-0" tructural 'ne 04 C BLANK ENDWALL PANEL DETAIL ELEVATION, 1 /4" PITCH *SOME COMPONENTS AND MATERIALS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY* RAKE TRIM LAPPING: 1) OVERLAP ADJACENT RAKE TRIMS BY 1" TO 2". 2) APPLY A BEAD OF CAULK BETWEEN ALL OVERLAPPING RAKE TRIM 7/8" SCREW I SURFACES. IM WASHERS J 3) FASTEN TRIMS TOGETHER AT LAP AS SHOWN: CONNECT TRIMS AND UNDERLYING ADAPTER TRIM, TRIMS AT INTERIOR MOST EDGE ON TOP, AND TRIMS WITH UNDERLYING HEADERS/JAMBS OR PANELS AT DOWNWARD FLANGE. 4) DOWN —SLOPE TRIM MUST BE NESTED INSIDE UP —SLOPE TRIM. COLOR —MATCHING SCREW WITH RUBBER WASHER FLANGE RAKE TRIM Q� �o M OH.S. EAVE TRIM AND RAKE TRIM CONNECTION DETAIL ADAPTER TRIM / #12-14 X 3/4" COLOR —MATCHING SCREW RAKE TRIM OVERLAP *SOME COMPONENTS AND MATERIALS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY* FACET TRIM LAPPING: 1) OVERLAP ADJACENT FACET TRIMS BY 1" TO 2". 2) APPLY A BEAD OF CAULK BETWEEN ALL OVERLAPPING FACET TRIM SURFACES. 3) FASTEN TRIMS TOGETHER AT LAP AS SHOWN: CONNECT TRIMS AND UNDERLYING SSR OUTSIDE CLOSURE, TRIMS AT INTERIOR MOST EDGE ON TOP, AND TRIMS WITH UNDERLYING HEADERS/JAMBS OR PANELS AT DOWNWARD FLANGE. COLOR —MATCHING SCREW WITH RU FACET TRIM SSR OUTSIDE CLOSUR COLOR —MATCHING SCREW FACET TRIM OVERLAP NOTE: IF NEEDED, NOTCH OR SLIT END CAP FOR ROOF PANEL OR ADAPTER TRIM CLEARANCE. THIS WILL MINIMIZE ROOF LEAKAGE AND THE AMOUNT OF CAULK NEEDED WF RAK NOTC t; END CAP END CAP NOTCH AT RAKE TRIM 12 ---(436312000) BLOCK SIDEWALL tructural 'ne 4) REursroly DBateyt U .c r\ Ld ap c O a U i �viCL o L p o L L i J N Q� � 121 m 0,� °o o a c E o W U 3 k m co 3 Q x a O G� W O zzP4 a a E- ':4 a P4 W A W O Uf�AF' zz W a O m f� V) Cy) �21 W a o m � Date � 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM Scale Plan No. y 54717 B Order No. y Sheet No. y F2e0 51 REVISION Date at, PART #INDEX PART # DESCRIPTION 5920019982 26ga. adapter trim, 16'-0" Iona 710881 Tri—Bead Tape Sealer 710892 Minor Rib Tape Sealer 710911 Metal Inside Closure 710933 fixed utility clip 710969 #12-14 x 1.25" Hex head screw 710977 #12 x 1.25" SDWW (zac) screw, GALVM 71194_ Rake Support Angle, lenqth varies 760600 #12 x 3/4" HWHSD screw 766000 1.5" o.d. fender washer INSULATION FLAME AND SMOKE RATING THE COMPOSITE OF FIBERGLASS AND FACING SHALL HAVE SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS NOT TO EXCEED 25 FLAME SPREAD AND 50 SMOKE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES 723 TEST METHOD OR ASTM E-84 TEST METHOD. INSULATION BY OTHERS TO MEET OR EXCEED THESE REQUIREMENTS. 25 RAKE ANGLE / ADAPTER TRIM PLACE ACROSS END WALL FRAMING WITH VERTICAL LEG FLUSH WITH STRUCTURAL LINE. INSTALL 3" LEG VERTICAL. NOTE THAT RAKE ANGLE AND ADAPTER TRIM ARE NOT TO EXTEND BEYOND THE STRUCTURAL EAVE LINE OF THE BUILDING. 28 INSIDE CLOSURE FIELD CUT CLOSURE AT STRUCTURAL LINE IF END WALL HAS CLOSETS. CUT CLOSURE TO EXTEND 1 Y4" PAST STRUCTURAL LINE IF END WALL IS A —PANEL. 29 ROOF CLIP POSITION THE CLIP AT EACH PURLIN. ROTATE THE CLIP ON THE MALE LIP UNTIL VERTICAL. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE CLIPS PROJECTING LEDGE FITS SNUGLY UNDER THE PANEL'S HORIZONTAL LEG AS SHOWN. FASTEN TO PURLIN. THE PANEL CLIP HAS FACTORY APPLIED SEALANT IN THE UPPER LIP. IF A CLIP MUST BE REMOVED, A NEW CLIP MUST BE USED OR GUN —GRADE SEALANT INSTALLED IN THE UPPER LIP. 43 INSULATION INSTALLATION IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ERECTOR TO INSTALL THE INSULATION WITH CONSIDERATION THAT ALL VOIDS IN AN INSULATED WALL NEED TO BE FILLED WITH INSULATION. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO ASSURE THAT EXTERIOR AIR INFILTRATION TO THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING IS MINIMIZED. LIGHT SHOULD NOT BE VISIBLE THROUGH CRACKS AND CREVICES. CAULK OR OTHER REMEDIES TO THESE SITUATIONS IS NOT SUPPLIED BY TRACHTE AND IS TO BE USED AND SUPPLIED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ERECTOR AND/OR OWNER. YOU MUST INSTALL THE INSULATION WITH THE VAPOR BARRIER TO THE CLIMATE CONTROLLED SIDE OF THE WALL & ROOF (INTERIOR). 93 RAKE TRIM ADAPTER WHEN ATTACHING RAKE ANGLE TRIM ADAPTOR STOP A BIT BACK FROM STRUCTURAL EAVE LINE, SNIP END TO FORM TABS THEN FOLD OVER TABS TO CLOSE END OPENING. \4 LAY FEMALE LIP OF PANEL OVER RAKE SUPPORT ANGLE. SECURE FEMALE UP TO RAKE SUPPORT ANGLE WITH CLAMP OR TEMPORARY FASTENERS. PANEL WILL NOT BE FASTENED PERMANENTLY TO RAKE SUPPORT ANGLE UNTIL ADAPTER TRIM IS INSTALLED. 25 71194_ Z STANDING S lg/I6„ 710892 28 710911 ID 710881 710911 herU� Ive tvwl 710881 *710892 NOT REQUIRED UNDER MINOR RIBS AT HIGH EAVE OF LEAN—TO WITH HIGH EAVE TRIM AND 710892 OUTSIDE CLOSURES* SSR PANEL OVERHANG AT EAVE J — BUILDING WITH GUTTER: 1-1/2" TO 2-1/4" BEYOND FACE OF EAVE TRIM — BUILDING WITHOUT GUTTER: 5" TO 6" BEYOND FACE OF EAVE TRIM (EAVE TRIM 0 FIRST PANEL INSTALLATION TRI—BEAD TAPE SEALER PROTECTIVE PAPER „ 0 G *TAPE SEALER NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY* USE A 2" x 2" CUT TO 23 3/4" LONG AS A SPACER INSIDE TO HOLD 24" CENTERUNES FROM PANEL TO PANEL (AT FASTENING LOCATIONS) 710977 (SSR PANEL CLOSURE (TYP.) PANEL) 23 3/4" 1.d. 1 2 8 7 6 5 4 3, (SSR PANEL 710933 NOT , STEPS, O / \ POOR ENDS, STEPS, OR SEALANT �9 710969 2 PER CUP (PURLIN LIN V METAL INSIDE CLOSURE TO EAVE NSIDE DRILLING12-1FASTENERS 1lle HEX HEAD (#710969) (�� TRIM CLOSURE (TYP.) (EAVE TRIM 71194 — ATTACH PANELS TO EAVE AND INSIDE CLOSURES AT THESE (8) APPLY SEALANT DIRECTLY LOCATIONS USING #12-14 x 1 1/4" ZAC`' HEX HEAD SELF —DRILLING INTO SSR MALE:FEMALE FASTENERS CONNECTION — FASTENERS MUST PENETRATE TRI—BEAD TAPE SEALER, INSIDE cc cc CLOSURES, EAVE TRIM AND UNDERLYING EAVE SPAN CHANNEL — IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT NOMINAL PANEL WIDTH IS MAINTAINED AT 4 o m m \ EAVE, WITH PROPER INSTALLATION OF INSIDE CLOSURES AND BY 24" o.c. trvvt INSTALLING FASTENERS IN PROPER SEQUENCE PURLIN - - lhe �rq1 HF-ADER i -. (OR 18" O.C. DEPENDENT O2 EAVE FASTENER SEQUENCE 2A CAULK U N DER SSR PANEL O ON SHEET WIDTH) RAKE SUPPORT INSTALL OUTSIDE CLOSURE DIRECTLY OVER TRI—BEAD TAPE SEALER. USING WASHERS, FASTEN /8" COLOR —MATCHING THROUGH CLOSURE, TAPE SCREWS AND PANEL (#12-14x1.25" ZAC HEAD 2-14x1.25" ZAC HEAD TRWITH RUBBER I —BEAD TAPE SEALER FOLLOWING PROVIDED SEQUENCE. DO NOT FASTEN TO PURUNS. 710969 2 PER 2 PER 710969 POSITION CLOSURES AS SHOWN WITH PRE —PUNCHED HOLES 1 1/2" _ ( STANDING SEAM ROOF / PANEL} / -( STANDING SEAM ROOF PANEL) O.C. FROM END OF PANEL \ 760600 766000 766000 760600 Ah ItK FAJItNING, AF'F'LT A GUN IINUUUS MLAU OF IUML StALAN I i1 oawn a Vona VI161 RE ALONG ALL EDGES OF CLOSURE THAT CONTACT ROOF PANELS, TRIM, 710911 AND/OR ADJACENT CLOSURES. i 710881 ENTIRE EAVE CLOSUREOVER & Q� BELOW CLOSURE ONLY 7108814 � � I �`� CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT, 71194_ 5 OVER CLOSURE & 710881 1 EAVE TRIM ) 8 BOTH SIDES OF CLOSURE ENTIRE EAVE g ' (PLACE ACROSS END WALL FRAMING AND OU FASTEN TO PURUN SPAN CUPS w/(2) SELF ROOF INSULATION INTERIOR O R BARRIER EAVE SPAN ANGLE ) •T`�DE DRILLING SCREWS #710969, VERTICAL LEG FLUSH EAVE TRIM INSTALLED TO INTERIOR OF BUILDING w/ STRUC. UNE) INSTALL 3" LEG VERTICAL 20 CLOSURE MALE CORRECT INCORRECT INCORRECT 4 RF OUTSIDE CLOSURE (ENDWALL PURLIN) TEMPORARILY FASTEN THE LAST PANEL (EAVE SPAN ANGLE EAVE TOP WITH A FASTENER OR VISE —GRIPS. THE CHANNEL PLACE TRI—BEAD TAPE SEALER OVER ENTIRE WIDTH OF PANEL. FASTENER SEQUENCE / SSR PANEL PANEL WALL BE ATTACHED PERMANENTLY HEADER _ REMOVE PROTECTIVE PAPER. ff WHEN THE RAKE TRIM AND ADAPTER TRIM ARE INSTALLED. CAUTION: FORCING TAPE SEALER BACK INTO CORNERS WILL LESSEN • S I D E AaL. BLANK TO PAGE "F2" FOR THICKNESS OF TAPE SEALER WHERE IT IS NEEDED MOST. �F FILL VOIDS W/ 6N SI E�WITHDE A CET TSURE RIM10875 SIDEWALL O WITH SEALANT CLOSURE ANEL TRI-BEAD TAPE SEALER O O8 O9 APPLICATION OUTSIDE CLOSURE PROFILE —MAJOR RIB TERMINATION PANEL / ROOF INSULATION w SS -ROOF NOTE: DO NOT EXTEND RAKE ANGLE OR ADAPTER TRIM BEYOND STRUCTURAL LINE. ROOF PANEL IS NOT TO BE CUT OUT AS SHOWN. PANEL IS ONLY CUT AWAY TO SHOW PARTS UNDER IT. 2'-0" 710881 ROOF PANELS STANDING SEAM 2-14x1.25" ZAC HEAD) C%`5920019982 710881 710881 �b (NOMINAL) ROOF 24 go. 710881 SEE EAVE FASTENER 710881 (ROOF PANEL) to �� PATTERN DETAIL 710881 2-14x1.25" ZAC HEAD) 5 71194_ / 5� 5920019982 Fib (5920019982 ROOF PANEL ) ROOF PANEL) *INSIDE CLOSURE 8 710911 710881 APPLY A CONTINUOUS 5 71194— 710933 2-140.25" ZAC HEAD) V-6" " LINE OVER EACH INSIDE 1 —6 McELROY STANDING SEAM 5 71194_ CLOSURE FOR THE ENTIRE EAVE 710969 710969 RIVIT (NOMINAL) ROOF PANELS 24 ga. UNE ALONG EAVE SPAN ANGLE y (RAKE ANGLE)` m 2 PER CUP BIRD STOP 710881 ° (RAKE ANGLEY--� PURLIN o o CUT TO FORM AROUND 0 o m THE TRIM ` SIDE WALL ° 'A' PANEL 710881 HEADER or CHANNEL) 'A' PANEL ry o 710881 \ SPANSPANANGLE) o SEAMING NOTE: VISUALLY CHECK TO SEE THAT THE DO NOT WALK ON THE MINOR RIBS. WALKING ON THE MINOR RIBS MAY RESULT IN EAVE SPAN ANGLE) PURLIN SSR TOOL SEAMS HAVE SNAPPED THE ENTIRE PERMANENT DAMAGE TO THE ROOF PANEL. DAMAGE MAY INCLUDE ROOF LEAKS, LENGTH OF PANEL. WHEN ASSEMBLED STANDING WATER, OR AESTHETIC DAMAGE. COLUMN (CORNER TRIM CORRECTLY, THE SEAM WILL LOCK DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, STEP ON THE PANEL AT THE PANEL ENDS COLUMN & STARTER JAMBTOGETHER WITH REASONABLE PRESSURE UNTIL THE PANEL IS FULLY ATTACHED. THE ROOF PANEL MAY NOT SUPPORT THE (CONFIRM COLUMN POSITION"a ~" W/ FLOOR PLAN) EAVE TRIM) HOWEVER, IFWITH A PROBLEMHAND OR F SOT WEIGHT OF A PERSON AT THESE LOCATIONS. (STARTER JAMB ENCOUNTERED IN FULLY SNAPPING THE SEAMS TOGETHER, SUCH AS IF THE PANEL MUST BE WALKED ON, PROTECT IT NTH 2x12 PLANKS THAT SPAN AN INCORRECTLY INSTALLED CUP, DAMAGED PANEL UP, OR A BUBBLE ACROSS A MINIMUM OF 3 PURUNS. THESE PLANKS WALL HELP TO DISTRIBUTE THE NOTE: HEADER & JAMB SIDEWALL IS CAUSED BY FAULTY ASSEMBLY, A SHAPING TOOL IS RECOMMENDED LOAD, BUT PANEL DAMAGE MAY STILL OCCUR IF THE LOADS OR FREQUENCY OF BLANK ENDWALL BC BLANK ENDWALL BC SHOWN. SIDEWALL MAY BE A —PANEL. THAT SHOULD ENABLE THE SEAM TO BE LOCKED WITH A MINIMUM TRAVEL ARE EXCESSIVE. SIDE WALL HEADER) THE ROOF SHOULD BE SWEPT CLEAN OF DRILL SHAVINGS AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN STANDING SEAM ROOF STANDING SEAM ROOF STANDING SEAM ROOF STANDING SEAM RUST SPOTS. 1 0 DETAIL AT EAVE DETAIL AT PURLIN G & RAKE TRIM DETAIL 0 ROOF PROFILES 16 �k LOWER RAKE ANGLE IS NOT NEEDED ON 1/4.12 PITCH BUILDING W/ ENDWALL DOORS SSR PANEL (TYP.)) OPTION: SEAMS STAPLED TOGETHER OPTION: SEAMS OVERLAPPED (STAPLE AS CLOSE TO BOTTOM 710933 APPLY ONE HALF OF MINOR RIB TAPE SEALER AT AS POSIBLE) 12-14 X 1-1/4 " SCREW ® e EACH OF THESE LOCATIONS TO COMPLETE SEAL AT � 2 PER CUP ® EAVE. ® a a 710881 2'-0" STANDING SEAM ROOF INSULATION ROOF PANEL 24 GA. 0 r —VAPOR BARRIER) SSR PANEL) �� I �, / i=r 710892 fh 1 f 5 711940 fj (RAKE AN STARTING END �000 • • • • v mm®I (OR RESTART O BOTTOM OF ROOF STEP) 6'-0" ROLL 6'-0" ROLL ENDWALL PURUN tructural ine 7 ROOF PANEL & R-2 INSULATION LAYOUT/LAP DETAIL *SOME COMPONENTS AND MATERIALS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY* *SOME COMPONENTS AND MATERIALS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY* RAKE TRIM LAPPING: FACET TRIM LAPPING: 1) OVERLAP ADJACENT RAKE TRIMS BY 1" TO 2". 1) OVERLAP ADJACENT FACET TRIMS BY 1" TO 2". 2)APPLY A BEAD OF CAULK BETWEEN ALL OVERLAPPING RAKE TRIM 2)APPLY A BEAD OF CAULK BETWEEN ALL OVERLAPPING FACET TRIM SURFACES. SURFACES. 3) FASTEN TRIMS TOGETHER AT LAP AS SHOWN: CONNECT TRIMS AND 3) FASTEN TRIMS TOGETHER AT LAP AS SHOWN: CONNECT TRIMS AND UNDERLYING ADAPTER TRIM, TRIMS AT INTERIOR MOST EDGE ON TOP, UNDERLYING SSR OUTSIDE CLOSURE, TRIMS AT INTERIOR MOST EDGE AND TRIMS WITH UNDERLYING HEADERS/JAMBS OR PANELS AT ON TOP, AND TRIMS WITH UNDERLYING HEADERS/JAMBS OR PANELS DOWNWARD FLANGE. AT DOWNWARD FLANGE. 4) DOWN —SLOPE TRIM MUST BE NESTED INSIDE UP —SLOPE TRIM. COLOR —MATCHING SCREW COLOR —MATCHING SCREW WITH RUBBER WASHER WITH RUBBER WASHER Aoti JQi > FACET TRIM RAKE TRIM ADAPTER TRIM J / #12-14 X 3/4" 1/ COLOR —MATCHING SCREW RAKE TRIM OVERLAP SSR OUTSIDE CLOSUR COLOR —MATCHING SCREW FACET TRIM OVERLAP 710881 3' ( ROOF PANEL +"� APPLY TRI—BEAD TAPE SEALER TO MALE LEG OF SSR PANEL DIRECTLY OVER INSIDE CLOSURE INSIDE CLOSURE) O19 SSR PANEL OVERHANG AT EAVE 21 TAPE SEALER AT NOTCH (1 /4:12 & 1 /2:12 PITCHES) O 710892� T 710892 m \� 710881 \ CUT MINOR RIB TAPE SEALER IN HALF WIDTH—WISE�` AND APPLY ONE HALF TO UNDERSIDE OF EVERY ; T NSIDE MINOR RIB OF SSR PANELS, POSITIONED TO CROSS Y CLOSURE (TYP.)) TRI—BEAD TAPE SEALER AT EAVE; NOT REQUIRED11 , AT HIGH EAVE OF LEAN—TO WITH HIGH EAVE TRIM AND OUTSIDE CLOSURES. 1 ? APPLY TRI—BEAD TAPE SEALER ON TOP AND SIDES OF EACH INSIDE® CLOSURE TO COMPLETE SEAL AT EAVE. APPLY TRI—BEAD TAPE SEALER CONTINUOUSLY ACROSS TOP OF EAVE TRIM, POSITIONED TO CONTACT UNDERSIDE OF INSIDE CLOSURES AND TRI—BEAD TAPE SEALER APPLIED OVER INSIDE CLOSURES. TAPE SEALER APPLICATION AT EAVE 6 C a� � o Ld op 0o�:o� 0 o C) o o � i ui o LLI 3 U x m � 3 a ' c) E� s o Q �� ro\� Q prq O Q'I zz � w zzx �wqW �7 z �D z z Q E CC O m :4 o PQ i/1 Co co a� o m � Date 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM Scale N. T. S. Plan No. 54717 B Order No. Sheet No. G 1. 0 ,0/ PART # INDEX 51 REVISION ey� Dote PART # DESCRIPTION 5920010126 26ga. qutter, sculpted, MBLK 5920010226 26ga. qutter, endcap, LH, MBLK 5920010326 26ga. qutter, endcap, RH, MBLK 5920010582 26ga. trim, hanqer, qutter, GALV 5920112326 18ga. qutter,downspout strap 4" x 6", MBLK 5920134226 26ga. downspout assembly, 4" x 6", MBLK, 8'4 EAVE 5920175526 26ga. downspout assembly, 4" x 6", MBLK, 9'4 EAVE 6051050390 10.1 oz. tube metal roof sealant 1/#14 X 7/8" SCREW W/EPDM WASHERS 0 2' O.C. TABS LAP INSIDE OF DOWNSPOUT. 08 FIELD CUTTING PROVIDED COMPONENTS OFTEN REQUIRE FIELD CUTTING. TO ENSURE AN APPROPRIATE APPEARANCE AND MINIMIZE CAULK REQUIRED, USE ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS AND QUALITY TOOLS FOR FIELD CUTS. SILL TRIM OFTEN REQUIRES NOTCHING TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH FASTENERS. LAP JOINTS SHOULD BE ARRANGED TO SHED WATER FROM OVERHEAD OR PREVAILING WIND DIRECTION. GUTTER CAULKING DIRECTIONS AND LOCATIONS APPLY CAULK AT GUTTER JOINTS BEFORE ASSEMBLY AND APPLY A SECOND BEAD OF CAULK AFTER GUTTER IS ASSEMBLED. 31 DOWN SPOUT SPACING & LOCATIONS DOWN SPOUTS ARE TYPICALLY LOCATED 40' O.C. (MAX). SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR ACTUAL LOCATIONS. FOR 8'-10" EAVE HEIGHT FIELD MODIFY 9'-4" EAVE DOWNSPOUT ASSEMBLY C (5920010582) (59200101261\ I I HEADER I I -HEADER) \1(5920134226 DOUBLE JAMB) (5920112326 I I ROLL —UP DOOR) 3 ( ROLL —UP DOOR J1.0 I _ 5920112326 I tructural 'ne A DOOR FRAME SIDEWALL WITH GUTTER 3 SIDES. (IDOWNSPOUTY___�_ ANGLE TOWARD _ BLDG. (DOWNSPOUT STRAP} ONE AT MID OF DOWNSPOUT. ONE 10" FROM BOTTOM. GUTTER HANGER) t SS -ROOF PANEL) �F 14 X 7/8" SCREW GUTTER BOTTOM 6" �I OPTIONAL STARTER HOLE TO CUT TABS EAVE TRIM) I �DOOR JAMB \ / OR A -PANEL) 4 1 /2" REF. 4" loe L APPLY SEALANT 1/4" REF. AROUND CORNERS TO CREATE TABS, FIELD CUT AT RIVET 10" REF. LOCATIONS OF DASHED LINES 4 PER STRAP AT LOCATIONS OF SOLID LINES, BEND TABS DOWNWARD 90' FIELD CUT FROM TOP TO DESIRED HEIGHT L5ne tural GROUND---------- — --GROUND GUTTER DETAIL 2 SS ROOF PRIOR TO INSTALLING GUTTER CAULKED DRIP EDGE (option 1) (ROOF PANEL DOWNSPOUT DROP HOLE HAND FORMED EDGE (option 2) RIVIT 4 PLCS. MIN. BEFORE INSTALLING GUTTER. OPTION 1 CREATES A 1/8" BEAD APPLY SEALANT AT OF SILICONE BASED RTV CAULK ALONG THE ENTIRE UNDERSIDE RIVET LOCATIONS EDGE OF THE ROOF PANEL TO PREVENT WATER FROM RUNNING UP THE PANEL (DO NOT USE BUM CAULK or ROOF SEALANT HERE). IN LIEU OF THIS A 1/8" TO 1/4" 30' BEND 127 6051050390 CAN BE HAND FORMED ON THE LOW EDGE WITH SEAMING SEALANT PLIERS TO CREATE A DRIP EDGE. TAKE CARE TO OBTAIN A GOOD APPEARENCE WHEN CHOOSING THIS PREFERRED METHOD. IF NEEDED NOTCH GUTTER AS SHOWN TO ALLOW FOR A LAP JOINT. CAULK WITH ROOF SEALANT AT THE JOINT. SMOOTH EXCESS CAULK TO ALLOW FREE FLOW OF WATER. 23 RF,r REQUIRED DRIP EDGE ON ROOF GUTTER SEAM/LAP DETAIL PANEL @ GUTTER ONLY C (5920010582) (5920010126�L) I J1.0 \*5920134226 5920112326 5920134226j 5920112326 Q3 J1.0 ' I 5920112326 59201 10 OSTEP AT DOOR SIDEWALL WITH GUTTER INSTALL RIVETED DOWNSPOUT SEAM TO BUILDING SIDE JAMBS/PANEL — — DOWNSPOUT STRAP) FIELD DRILL & RIVET) z 6" DOWNSPOUT -100 O DOWNSPOUT AND STRAP CONNECTION 5 PLCS. MIN. APPLY SEALANT AT RIVET LOCATIONS (6051050390�— SEALANT ONLY DVE REAR TAB IF NEEDED TO ROOF PANEL. (5920010226) (5920010326) TABS LAP INSIDE OF GUTTER. GUTTER ENDCAP DETAIL FASTENERS SHOULD BlflE Ell INSTALLED ON "OPEN" SIDE OF SEAM. GUTTER HANGER) ANEL f STANDING SEAM ROOF GUTTER HANGER SECUREMENT OPTION 1 SEE OWNER FOR PREFERRED OPTION. STANDING SEAM ROOF) (GUTTER HANGER 2' O.C. C#14 X 7/8" SCREW W/EPDM WASHERS GUTTER WEND CAP INSTALLED RAKE TRIM W/ENDCAP GUTTER AND RAKE TRIM CONNECTION DETAIL 1 vo GUTTER _"- FIELD DRILL & RIVET 3 SIDES FIELD BEND TABS DOWN 90% TABS LAP INSIDE OF DOWNSPOUT. DOWNSPOUT C DOWNSPOUT DROP AND GUTTER CONNECTION OPTION 2 SEE OWNER FOR PREFERRED OPTION. RAKE TRIM W/ENDCAP *SCREW 6" O.C. STANDING SEAM ROOF ® r#14 X 7/8" SCREW1 `W/EPDM (WASHERS J i ® i REMOVE FLANGE 08 GUTTER W/END CAP INSTALLED) (#14 X 7/8" SCREW W/EPDM WASHERS GUTTER HANGER) 2' O.C. GUTTER AND RAKE TRIM CONNECTION DETAIL C m � N 3 Ld a0 O O � U ��Co� �a o_ Q Z O m '6i -is 0; 00 o o, � E 1)o Li.I U 3 k C2 1 3 = O N N Q Ln O Q o o a o x 0 0 o� z z x w ha�� a U W 'D W P� A hi 0 0 o o Date 4/5/24 Drawn by BRM Scale 1/2" = 1'-C Plan No. 54717 B Order No. y Sheet No. � 11.0 52 Trachte Building Systems, Inc. Project Calculations Per 2020 Minnesota Building Code Bruce Stainbrook Monticello, MN TBS Plan Number: P54717 Phase B 4/ 1 /2024 Table of Contents Building Al Pages Al — B2 ASCE 7 Hazard Report Pages C 1 — C3 Prepared By David J. Urke Reviewed By 53 TRACHTE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. PROJECT CALCULATIONS Customer Bruce Stainbrook Prepared By: David J. Urke Location Monticello, MN Revised By: Plan Number P54717 Phase B Building Al Code Body 2020 Minnesota Building Code Building Description ROOF PITCH 0.25 in/ft Bay Width 10 ft Purlin Bridging No ROOF ANGLE 1.19 Deg Building Height 9.33 ft Roof Type SSR ROOF SLOPE Lean-to Building Width 25 ft Purlin Spacing 5 ft RISK CATEGORY II Building Length 310 ft Int. PT Panel Yes Floor to Floor 0.00 ft Int. Lateral Bridging No Snow Load Seismic Load GROUND SNOW LOAD (Pg) 50 psf Analysis Procedure ROOF SNOW LOAD MIN 42 psf Building Frame Systems SNOW EXPOSURE CATEGORY B Seismic Site Class SNOW INPORTANCE FACTOR (Is) 1 Short Period Spectral Acc. (Ss) THERMAL FACTOR (Ct) 1.2 1 Second Period Spectral Acc. (S1) SNOW EXPOSURE Partial Spectral Response Acc. (SIDS) ROOF LIVE LOAD (Lr) 20 psf Spectral Response Acc. (SD1) FLAT ROOF SNOW LOAD (Pf) 42 psf Response Factor UNBALANCED SNOW LOAD 42.0 psf Seismic Design Category SNOW LOAD USED IN DESIGN 42.00 psf Seismic Response Coefficient (Cs) RAIN SURCHARGE 0 psf Soils Report Required Wind Load Dead Load BASIC DESIGN WIND SPEED (V) 115 mph ALLOWABLE WIND SPEED (Vasil) 89 mph Roof Dead Load WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY B Partition Dead Load EDGE STRIP WIDTH 3.00 ft Additional Long. Dead Load Additional Trans. Dead Load COMPONTENTS AND CLADDING (METHOD 2) ENDWALL GIRT 22 psf Base Shear Lonqitudinal SIDEWALL GIRT 21 psf Seismic PURLIN -35 psf Wind MAIN WIND FORCE (METHOD 2) WALL (PRESSURE AND SUCTION) 16.00 psf ROOF 8 psf Equivalent lateral force -ight Frame Wall w/ Flat Strap Bracirn D 0.050 0.023 0.053 0.037 4 A 0.01 NO 3 psf 3 psf 0 psf 0 psf Transverse 933 Ibs 30 Ibs 1151lbs 508lbs P54717_A1.xlsx Al 4/1 /2024 54 Anchor Information EDGE DISTANCE (�N TVs (�Vc 3 in 0.65 (TABLE 3 ESR-3889) 0.60 (TABLE 4 ESR-3889) 0.70 (TABLE 4 ESR-3889) Units Notation Nominal Anchor Diameter in do Nom. Embedment Depth in hnom Effective Embedment in hef Minimum Concrete thickness in t Minimum Edge Distance in c_min Minimum Spacing Distance in s-min Minimum Nom. Anchor Length in lanch Critical Edge Distance in c_ac Steel Strength - Tension lb Nsa Steel Strength - Shear lb Vsa Seismic Steel Strength - Shear lb Vsa_eq Load Bearing Length in le 'Values Obtained from ICC-ES Evaluation Report ESR-3889 Corner Anchor nc ca1_c 2.75 in s1_c 0 in ca2_c 2.75 in s2_c 0 in en_c 0 in ev_c 0 in Exterior Anchors ne 2 ca1_e 2.75 in s1_e 0 in ca2_e 100 in s2_e 5 in en_e 0 in ev_e 0 in Interior Anchors ni 1 ca1_i 100 in s1_i 0 in ca2_i 100 in s2_i 0 in en_i 0 in ev_i 0 in CONCRETE STRENGTH 2500 psi LPcn 1 in kc 17 Np 0 kip 3/8" Anchors 1/2" Anchors 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.00 2.50 3.25 2.50 3.00 4.25 1.33 1.75 2.39 1.75 2.17 3.23 3.50 4.00 5.00 4.50 5.25 6.75 cmin = 1.5 for smin >_3, 1.75 1.75 1.75 smin =2 for cmin>_2 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 3.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.30 7.80 3.30 5.90 8.10 8730 8730 8730 20475 20475 20475 3465 3465 4345 8860 8860 11175 2415 2415 3030 7090 7090 8940 1.33 1.75 2.39 1.75 2.17 3.23 number of bolts at column distance between bolts from edge 2 distance between bolts along edge 1 distance of bolts from edge 1 distance between bolts along edge 2 distance from resultant tension load to centroid of anchors in tension distance from resultant shear load to centroid of anchors in shear number of bolts at column distance between bolts from edge 2 distance between bolts along edge 1 distance of bolts from edge 1 distance between bolts along edge 2 distance from resultant tension load to centroid of anchors in tension distance from resultant shear load to centroid of anchors in shear number of bolts at column distance between bolts from edge 2 distance between bolts along edge 1 distance of bolts from edge 1 distance between bolts along edge 2 distance from resultant tension load to centroid of anchors in tension distance from resultant shear load to centroid of anchors in shear P54717_A1.xlsx A2 4/1/2024 55 Anchor Force Summary Shear Uplift Wind/Long/Int 0 lb 130 lb Wind/Long/Ext 192 lb 334 lb Wind/Trans/Int 42 lb 130 lb Wind/Trans/Ext 169 lb 381 lb Seismic/Long/Int 0 lb -346 lb Seismic/Long/Ext 444 lb 241 lb Seismic/Trans/Int 5 lb -346 lb Seismic/Trans/Ext 19 lb -137 lb Ultimate Loads For Anchors Tension (Int) 847.44 lb Tension (Ext) 1316.03 lb Shear (Int) 912.63 lb Shear (Ext) 1247.40 lb Anchor Bolt Interaction Check (Applied Uplift/Tension + Applied Shear < 1.2) Longitudinal Transverse Interior Anchors Wind 0.15 Wind Seismic 0.00 Seismic Exterior Anchors Wind 0.41 Wind Seismic 0.69 Seismic Corner Anchors Wind 0.21 Wind Seismic 0.00 Seismic Anchor Size Interior 3/8" x 2.5" Exterior 3/8" x 2.5' 0.20 0.01 0.42 0.02 0.21 0.00 P54717_A1.xlsx A3 4/1/2024 56 Panel Check Panel Capacity Longitudinal Shear Panel Required Longitudinal Shear Panel Transverse Shear Panel Required Transverse Shear Panel Longitudinal Shear Wall Transverse Shear Wall Strap Braces (If Reauired) Longitudinal Transverse Allowable Tension in Strap Longitudinal Strap Angle Transverse Strap Angle Longitudinal Tension in Strap Transverse Tension in Strap V,. OR V, bay 53 plf 21.72 ft Oft 9.58 ft 15ft NOT OK OK 4 0 3742.51 lb 43.03 degrees 43.03 degrees 1575 lb 0 lb (IF PANEL CHECK IS "OK" NO STRAP BRACES REQUIRED FOR LATERAL FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM. BUT STRAPS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ANCHORING) COMPRESSION MEMBER T, V1 OR VT. I I P.Po.. height Uplift T . I V Bra c ewol. Input Values Load Combinations Purlin Bridge Spacing 5 ft Depth of Purlin 7 in LC1 = Dead + max(Snow and Roof Live Load) Min. Depth of Purlin 7 in LC2 = Dead + max(0.75'Snow and 0.75'Roof Live Load) Height of Horizontal Bracing 4.8646 ft LC3 = Dead + max(0.6"Wind or 0.7"Seismic) Web of Interior Column 3.5 in LC4 = Dead + 0.45'Wind + max(0.75*Snow and 0.75*Roof Live Load) Web of Sidewall Column 3.5 in LC5 = Dead + 0.525" Seismic+ 0.75"Snow Web of Endwall Column 3.5 in LC6 = 0.6'Dead + Max(0.6*Wind or 0.7'Seismic) Depth of Large Stub Header 9 in Qty of Large Stub Headers 1 Depth of Small Stub Header 5.5 in Qty of Small Stub Header 1 Web of Sidewall Girt 3.5 in Qty of Sidewall Girts 1 Web of Endwall Girts 3.5 in Qty of Endwall Girts 1 P54717_A1.xlsx A4 4/1/2024 57 Purlin Information Purlin Loads Uniform Load End Reaction Moment LC1 225.00 plf 1125.00 Ibs 2812.50 ft-Ibs LC4 187.70 plf 938.49 Ibs 2346.22 ft-Ibs LC6 -44.15 plf -220.73 Ibs -551.83 ft-Ibs LC6(end area) -85.13 plf -425.67 Ibs -1064.18 ft-Ibs Purlin Member 7 x 16ga, 50ksi Cee Purlin Purlin Interaction (Positive) 0.88 Purlin Interaction (Negative) 0.33 Purlin Bracing Conditions Lx 118.50 in Lypos 118.50 in Ltpos 118.50 in Lyneg 118.50 in Ltneg 118.50 in Stub Header Information Stub Header Loads Reaction Moment LC1 1125.00 Ibs 5625.00 ft-Ibs LC4 938.49 Ibs 4692.44 ft-Ibs LC6 -425.67 Ibs -2128.37 ft-Ibs Member Sizes Large Stub Header 9 x 3.2 x 14ga 50 ksi Stub Header Large Stub Header Length 10 ft Large Stub Header Interaction 0.94 Large Stub Header Bracing Conditions Lx 120 in Ly 120 in Lt 120 in Small Stub Header 5.5 x 3.2 x 12ga 50 ksi Stub Header Small Stub Header Length 5 ft Small Stub Header Interaction 0.97 Small Stub Header Bracing Conditions Lx 60 in Ly 60 in Lt 60 in Interior Column Information Interior Column Load Axial Load Moment LC1 2250 Ibs 0 ft-Ibs LC3 390 Ibs 0 ft-Ibs LC4 1905 Ibs 222 ft-Ibs LC5 1729 Ibs 222 ft-Ibs Interior Column Member 3.63 x 2 x 16ga, 50 ksi Interior Column Interior Column Interaction 0.96 Interior Column Bracing Condition Lx 111.25 in Ly 12.00 in Lt 111.25 in P54717_A1.xlsx A5 4/1 /2024 58 Sidewall Column Information Sidewall Column Loads Axial Moment LC1 1125 Ibs 0 ft-Ibs LC3 356 Ibs LC4 1073 Ibs Sidewall Column Member 3.63 x 1.5 x 18ga 33 ksi Column Sidewall Column Interaction 0.415 Sidewall Bracing Conditions Lx 118 in Ly 39 in Lt 39 in Endwall Column Information Endwall Column Loads Axial Uniform Load Moment LC1 1125 Ibs LC3 356 Ibs 48 plf 583 ft-Ibs LC4 1073 Ibs 36 plf 437 ft-Ibs Endwall Column Member 3.63 x 1.5 x 18ga 33 ksi Column Endwall Column Interaction 0.969 Endwall Bracing Conditions Lx 111 in Ly 44 in Lt 44 in Girt Information Girt Loads Uniform Load End Reaction Moment Sidewall Girt in Mid Zone 35 plf 176 Ibs 440 ft-Ibs Sidewall Girt in End Zone 41 plf 206 Ibs 516 ft-Ibs Endwall Girt in Mid Zone 40 plf 202 Ibs 126 ft-Ibs Endwall Girt in End Zone 49 plf 243 Ibs 152 ft-Ibs Sidewall Girt Member 3.5 x 1.75 x 18ga 33 ksi Girt Sidewall Girt Interaction 0.761 Sidewall Girt Bracing Lx 119 in Ly 12 in Lt 119 in Endwall Girt Member 3.5 x 1.75 x 18ga 33 ksi Girt Endwall Girt Interaction 0.224 Endwall Girt Bracing Lx 59 in Ly 12 in Lt 59 in Stud Information Stud Loads Uniform Load Moment Studs in Mid Zone 16 plf 199 ft-Ibs Studs in End Zone 18 plf 223 ft-Ibs Stud Member 3.625 x 2 x 20ga 33 ksi Stud Stud Interaction 0.389 Stud Bracing Lx 118 in Ly in 39 Lt 39 in P54717_A1.xlsx A6 4/1 /2024 59 Jambs Jambs Loads Axial Load Moment LC1 1125 Ibs NA LC3 356 Ibs LC3 296 Ibs NA LC4 1073 Ibs LC5 1028 Ibs NA Sidewall Jamb Uniform Load 100 plf Sidewall Jamb Applied Moment 131 Ib'ft Endwall Jamb Uniform Load 52 plf Endwall Jamb Applied Moment 69 Ib'ft Jamb Axial Load 1125.00 lb Jamb Moment Capacity 971.08 Ib'ft Jamb Axial Capacity 5691.00 lb Sidewall Jamb Check OK Endwall Jamb Check OK Endwall Header Checks Endwall header moment capacity 2922.5 Ib`ft Endwall Applied Moment 2812.5 Ib'ft 16" Endwall Header Check 16 in EW Header - OK 22" Endwall Header Check 22 in EW Header - OK Foundation Information Interior Column Reactions Gravity 2250 Ibs Uplift 150 Ibs Exterior Column Reactions Gravity 1125 Ibs Uplift 774 Ibs Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure 1500 psf Slab Thickness 6.00 in Pad Width NA Pad Depth NA 131 ft-Ibs 99 ft-Ibs P54717_A1.xlsx A7 4/1 /2024 Job Name so Job Location Sheet # of ♦ ♦ Plan # By Date I C�� AS A Z 3 "Om 04� Mo,%N - 12" Tay + ,3 C6 iz (d -26 z ")(,2 �5 =D.31 1.00 0 3i 0,0q -Z p, Sri >> 0. Dom C } 2571 C9 I�rn 2 . ft = /�0 M� Wav P6R � 0A, Ail ✓✓ use 13 ca Il" U.C. B1 r Job Name ♦ Job Location ♦ ♦ Plan # �q✓C� 100�oo 60000 �e = ).0 pi Y(-z CCon5ee-VOI'i,) i (0000 61 Sheet # of By Date Cl'Ot r, 4r-! Z o B2 62 ASCE AMERICAN SOCIM OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Address: 36 Dundas Rd Monticello, Minnesota 55362 1 1 2 N' l BI. wrn.n b I eo•lain�� i Wind Results: Wind Speed 10-year MRI 25-year MRI 50-year MRI 100-year MRI ASCE Hazards Report Standard: ASCE/SE17-16 Latitude: 45.289884 Risk Category: II Longitude:-93.801109 Soil Class: D - Default (see Elevation: 963.8113295230639 ft Section 11.4.3) (NAVD 88) ThtntJ: r•Yk U• Cr ]d JRd 109 Vmph 75 Vmph 82 Vmph 87 Vmph 93 Vmph Mrs \ N5N1 I.I�fY L+L• Lb rani Data Source: ASCE/SEI 7-16, Fig. 26.5-1 B and Figs. CC.2-1—CC.2-4, and Section 26.5.2 Date Accessed: Mon Apr 01 2024 Value provided is 3-second gust wind speeds at 33 ft above ground for Exposure C Category, based on linear interpolation between contours. Wind speeds are interpolated in accordance with the 7-16 Standard. Wind speeds correspond to approximately a 7% probability of exceedance in 50 years (annual exceedance probability = 0.00143, MRI = 700 years). Site is not in a hurricane -prone region as defined in ASCE/SEI 7-16 Section 26.2. h%)s://ascehazardtool.orq/ C1 Mon Apr 01 2024 63 ASCE® AMERICAN SOCIM OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Seismic Site Soil Class: D - Default (see Section 11.4.3) Results: SS 0.05 S, 0.023 Fa 1.6 F 2.4 SMS : 0.081 SM1 0.056 SIDS : 0.054 Seismic Design 1616b pRnse Spectrum 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0 � Sa (g) vs T(s) 0.045 0.040 0.035 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0 12 14 SW TL PGA: PGA M F PGA I : C, : 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0 0.038 12 0.024 0.038 1.6 1 0.7 Design Response Spectrum i. Sa(g) vs T(s) 12 14 MCER Vertical Response Spectrum o 030 Design Vertical Response Spectrum 10 Sa(9) vs T(s) 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 1 5 2.0 0 Sa(9) vs T(s) Data Accessed: Mon Apr 01 2024 Date Source: USGS Seismic Design Maps based on ASCE/SEI 7-16 and ASCE/SEI 7-16 Table 1.5-2. Additional data for site -specific ground motion procedures in accordance with ASCE/SEI 7-16 Ch. 21 are available from USGS. httos://ascehazardtool.ora/ C2 Mon Apr 01 2024 64 ASCE® AMERICAN SOCIM OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Snow Results: Ground Snow Load, pg Mapped Elevation: Data Source: Date Accessed: 2 50 I b/ft 963.8 ft ASCE/SEI 7-16, Table 7.2-8 Mon Apr 01 2024 Values provided are ground snow loads. In areas designated "case study required," extreme local variations in ground snow loads preclude mapping at this scale. Site -specific case studies are required to establish ground snow loads at elevations not covered. Snow load values are mapped to a 0.5 mile resolution. This resolution can create a mismatch between the mapped elevation and the site -specific elevation in topographically complex areas. Engineers should consult the local authority having jurisdiction in locations where the reported `elevation' and `mapped elevation' differ significantly from each other. The ASCE Hazard Tool is provided for your convenience, for informational purposes only, and is provided "as is" and without warranties of any kind. The location data included herein has been obtained from information developed, produced, and maintained by third party providers; or has been extrapolated from maps incorporated in the ASCE standard. While ASCE has made every effort to use data obtained from reliable sources or methodologies, ASCE does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, reliability, currency, or quality of any data provided herein. Any third -party links provided by this Tool should not be construed as an endorsement, affiliation, relationship, or sponsorship of such third -party content by or from ASCE. ASCE does not intend, nor should anyone interpret, the results provided by this Tool to replace the sound judgment of a competent professional, having knowledge and experience in the appropriate field(s) of practice, nor to substitute for the standard of care required of such professionals in interpreting and applying the contents of this Tool or the ASCE standard. In using this Tool, you expressly assume all risks associated with your use. Under no circumstances shall ASCE or its officers, directors, employees, members, affiliates, or agents be liable to you or any other person for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages arising from or related to your use of, or reliance on, the Tool or any information obtained therein. To the fullest extent permitted by law, you agree to release and hold harmless ASCE from any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from any use of data provided by the ASCE Hazard Tool. https://ascehazardtool.orq/ C3 Mon Apr 01 2024 65 Monticello May 30`h, 2024 PHONE:763-295-2711 Fax:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street I Suite 1 I Monticello, MN 55362 Re: 36 Dundas Road, Applicant: Bruce Stainbrook, Storage Link of Monticello LLC. The Department of Building Safety and Fire Department have the following comments: • Verify the exterior walls adjacent to the property line meet the Building Code. • Verify the locations of the existing fire hydrants are approved by the Fire Chief. • Verify the fire truck turning radius to enter the property is approved by the Fire Chief. These items may be reviewed with Building Permit application. Please contact the Building Department, or the Fire Department with any questions. Sincerely, Ron Hac�k1enmueller - 41 fV "tlst� Chief Building Official www.ci.monticello.mn.us 66 (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) CEDAR STREET STORAGE (PC# 2021-026) THIS DEVELOPMENT CONTACT ("Contract") dated , 2024, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and STORAGELINK OF MONTICELLO, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for CEDAR STREET STORAGE (referred to in this agreement as the "plat" and the "Development") consisting of 3.5 acres. The land is located in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" ("Property"). The Developer is developing the Property under the Cedar Street Storage Planned Unit Development zoning standards. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder within 365 days after the City Council approves the final plat or the execution of this Contract, whichever occurs later. 217248v1 67 The City hereby grants approval to the Plat provided the Development is consistent with the conditions of this Contract and the specific City conditions as set forth in City Resolutions 2024-53, 2024- 54, 2024-55, adopted by the City Council on June 24, 2024, and subject to the conditions of the staff report of the City Council Agenda dated June 24, 2024. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Contract has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat has been submitted to the Wright County Recorder's Office/Registrar of Title's Office, and 4) the City has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. The Development is not a phased development. All parcels described on Exhibit A will be combined into one parcel. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. Intentionally omitted. 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan and official controls. 7. CONDITION FOR SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS. No final plat for changes or amendments to this Agreement shall be approved, nor shall construction commence for such additional 2 217248v1 68 land uses, until an amendment to the Agreement is processed and approved, subject to the requirements of the Monticello Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. 8. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plans A and B, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Plat Plan B - Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Plan C — Landscaping Plan 9. IMPROVEMENTS. The Development improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other ordinances. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all written instructions received from the City's inspectors subject to Developer's plans and specifications. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" plans, 3 217248v1 69 an electronic file of the "as constructed" plans in an auto CAD.DWG file or a .DXF file, and two complete sets of blue line "as constructed" plans, all prepared in accordance with City standards. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 505.021, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 10. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: • Wright County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights -of -Way • Wright County Soil Conservation District • MnDot for State Highway Access • Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains • NPDES Permit for Stormwater Connections • MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal • DNR for Dewatering • City of Monticello for Building Permits 11. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer's and the Developer's contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. Intentionally omitted. 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the platted property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 14. EROSION CONTROL AND STORM WATER CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and 4 217248A 70 approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control and storm water requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 48 hours after the completion of the work or in an area that is inactive for more than seven (7) days unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification which may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan and storm water control measures are in place. 15. GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading plan, stormwater control measures and erosion control plan as set forth in Plan "B". The plan shall conform to City of Monticello specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits (except as permitted by this agreement or the Building Official), the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Additionally, the "as constructed" grading plan will include a certification that the grading following construction activities has been undisturbed or 5 217248v1 71 has been returned to the state required in the grading plan. The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations, and building pads. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The Developer certifies to the City that all lots with building footings placed on fill have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed applicable specifications. 16. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the plat, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall pay a penalty of $100.00 a day for each calendar day that the streets are not cleaned in accordance with this paragraph. If the Developer repeatedly fails to clean streets in accordance with this paragraph, the City may, in its discretion, perform the work or contract to have the work completed and bill the costs to the Developer. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days from the date notice of the amount owed to the City is mailed, the City may draw down the Irrevocable Letter of Credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Plat is in full compliance with the requirements of this paragraph. 6 217248v1 72 17. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 18. CITY PLANNING, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATION. No public improvements are proposed with the plat. No City escrows for planning, legal administration are therefore required. 19. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. A. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to grading and restoration of the subject property. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to grading and restoration of the site, consultation with Developer and their engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be three percent (3.0%), of the estimated construction cost of the subject property grading and restoration cost, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,000.00 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full-time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. B. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section shall be paid from the escrow amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. 7 217248v1 73 20. CLAIMS. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125 percent of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Contract. 21. STORM SEWER AREA TRUNK AREA CHARGE. As a fully developed site, the plat is not subject to a storm sewer area charge. 22. SANITARY SEWER TRUNK AREA CHARGE. As a fully developed site, the plat is not subject to a sanitary sewer area charge. 23. WATER MAIN AREA TRUNK CHARGE. As a fully developed site, the plat is not subject to a water main area charge. 24. PARK DEDICATION. Intentionally omitted. 25. LANDSCAPING. The Developer shall follow all requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance requirements and the City approved Landscape Plan. 26. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. The applicants have identified the installation of concrete surfacing as a suitable maintenance process for the south side of the building and site area, subject to the approval of this material treatment by the City Council. 8 217248v1 74 B. The applicants supplement the request with a Landscape Plan that shows extensive screen plantings consistent with the Central biome of The Pointes at Cedar along the south boundary not occupied by the new building. C. The City approves vacation of easements that lie under existing or proposed building sites, with drainage and utility easements to be reestablished per the City Engineer's recommendations. D. Compliance with the terms of the Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator's letter dated May 30, 2024. E. Developer shall execute an Encroachment Agreement to the City for any facilities located within the drainage and utility areas located on the plat. F. Prior to City Council approval of the final plat, the Developer shall furnish a boundary survey of the proposed property to be platted with all property corner monumentation in place and marked with lath and a flag. Any encroachments on or adjacent to the property shall be noted on the survey. The Developer shall post a $300.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners. The security was calculated as follows: 1 unit at $300.00 per unit. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. In addition, the certificate of survey must also include a certification that all irons for a specific lot have either been found or set prior to the issuance of a building permit for that lot. J. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be either AutoCAD.DWG file or a .DXF file. All construction record drawings (e.g., grading, utilities, and streets) shall be in electronic format in accordance with standard City specifications. 9 217248v1 75 27. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. A. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for grading and landscaping, plus a cash fee of $X,XXX.00 for City engineering, expenses and administration. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: Lot Monuments $ 300.00 Grading $ 3,000.00 Landscaping $XX,XXX.00 ($X 125%) TOTAL $ XX,XXX.00 The irrevocable letter of credit or other security deemed acceptable to the City is referred to throughout this Agreement as the "Security". The Security shall be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "B", from a bank approved by the City. The bank shall be authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, and shall provide a Minnesota office for presentment of the Letter of Credit or other alternative acceptable to the City. The Security shall extend through completion and acceptance (including the expected warranty period) by the City of the Development Work. This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the Security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The Security shall be for a term ending when maintenance bond is posted. Individual security instruments may be for shorter terms provided they are automatically renewed on an annual basis until expiration. The City may draw down the Security with 30 days written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the Security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal of the Security, the City may also draw it down. If the Security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been 10 217248v1 76 satisfied, with City approval the Security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as Security until all improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty security is provided, and the public improvements are accepted by the City Council. 28. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City prior to the time of final plat approval: Engineering and Inspection Grading/Restoration & Erosion & Sediment Control Inspection Fee (3% of grading) $ 2,000.00* Total Cash Requirements $ 2,000.00* * Fees reconciled to actual expenses at close of project. 29. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for public improvements and underground utilities is two years and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Council. The Developer or its Contractors shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs to secure the warranties. Maintenance Bonds of the prime contractor may be accepted subject to City approval. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. The City standard specifications for utilities construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of utilities. 30. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. 11 217248v1 77 A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all actual costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The Developer shall deposit with the City the amount set forth in Section 30 to be used for the payment of these fees and enforcement fees. If the amount in the deposit account drops below 15% of the initial amount, the Developer will make additional deposits in amounts set by the City. At the completion of the project and following payment of all expenses related to the project, the City shall return the remaining deposit funds to the Developer. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Contract. The Developer hereby waives all assessment notice and hearing requirements. If the Developer elects to have the charges set forth in this contract assessed to the properties herein, the assessment shall be payable over a five year period, in ten equal principal installments, plus interest at 1.5 % over prime as published in the Wall Street Journal at the time of assessment per annum on the remaining principal balance each year. Interest will begin to 12 217248v1 78 accrue on the principal balance commencing on the date of final plat approval by the City of Monticello or the date of this contract, whichever is later. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. G. If the Developer is dedicating property to the City to satisfy Park Dedication requirements, separate legal descriptions shall be developed for these properties and quitclaim deeds shall be executed for each of the transactions. The Developer agrees to pay all real estate taxes due or payable on outlots transferred to the City for the period up to the time the outlots become tax exempt. 31. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty- eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 32. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, 13 217248v1 79 zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the plat ceases to comply with county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well 14 217248v1 80 seized in fee title of the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. In the event this Contract is filed of record, upon compliance of all terms herein by Developer, the City shall file a termination of record. H. Insurance. Developer and Contractor shall provide a copy of the Development Contract to their insurance professional for verification that the Developer's and Contractor's insurance coverage is in compliance with the requirements of the Development Contract. Prior to execution of the final plat, Developer and its general contractor shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance showing proof of the required insurance required under this Paragraph. Developer and its general contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, such insurance as shall protect Developer and its general contractor and the City for work covered by the Contract including workers' compensation claims and property damage, bodily and personal injury which may arise from operations under this Contract, whether such operations are by Developer and its general contractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them. The minimum amounts of insurance shall be as follows: Commercial General Liability (or in combination with an umbrella policy) $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate The following coverages shall be included: Premises and Operations Bodily Injury and Property Damage Personal and Advertising Injury Blanket Contractual Liability Products and Completed Operations Liability Automobile Liability (or in combination with an umbrella policy) $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit — Bodily Injury & Property Damage 15 217248v1 81 Including Owned, Hired & Non -Owned Automobiles Workers Compensation Workers' Compensation insurance in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota, including Employer's Liability with minimum limits are as follows: • $500, 000 —Bodily Injury by Disease per employee • $500, 000 —Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate • $500, 000 —Bodily Injury by Accident The Developer's and general contractor's insurance must be "Primary and Non -Contributory". All insurance policies (or riders) required by this Contract shall be (i) taken out by and maintained with responsible insurance companies organized under the laws of one of the states of the United States and qualified to do business in the State of Minnesota, (ii) shall name the City, its employees and agents as additional insureds (CGL and umbrella only) by endorsement which shall be filed with the City and (iii) shall identify the name of the plat. A conv of the endorsement must be submitted with the certificate of insurance. Developer's and general contractor's policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days' advanced written notice to the City, or ten (10) days' notice for non-payment of premium. An Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance policy may be used to supplement Developer's or general contractor's policy limits on a follow -form basis to satisfy the full policy limits required by this Contract. I. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Developer agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, and its employees, officials, and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of Developer's negligence or its performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Contract. Developer's indemnification obligation shall apply to Developer's general contractor, subcontractor(s), or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by Developer, or anyone for whose acts Developer may 16 217248v1 82 be liable. Developer agrees this indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Contract. J. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council, unless such assignment is to a principal of Developer or another entity in which the Developer is a principal. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells part or parts of the platted land, until all conditions of assignment are met. L. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls, the development plans, or special conditions referred to in this Contract required to be constructed shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. 33. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: StorageLink of Monticello, LLC, 1650 Blackberry Circle, Sartell, MN 56377. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or 17 217248v1 83 mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, with a copy to the City Attorney by regular mail at: Campbell Knutson, P.A., Grand Oak Office Center I, 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290, Eagan, Minnesota 55121. Remainder ofpage intentionally left blank. Signatures on the following pages. 18 217248vl 84 CITY OF MONTICELLO (SEAL) 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor Rachel Leonard, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2024, by Lloyd Hilgart and by Rachel Leonard, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 19 217248v1 85 DEVELOPER: RRG HOLDINGS, LLC Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2024, by , the LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ day of of StorageLink Monticello, 20 217248v1 wt EXHIBIT "A" Legal description Lot 1, Block 2, Amax Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. AND That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds West, along the North line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1056.00 feet, thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds West, parallel with the East line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 632.54 feet to the centerline of a 80.00 foot roadway and utility easement and the actual point of beginning, thence continue South 00 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds West, on said parallel line, 291.46 feet, thence South 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds West, parallel with the North line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, 319.14 feet to the East line of a tract of land recorded in Book 293 of Deeds, page 872, in the Office of the Wright County Recorder, thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 07 seconds East along said East line and its northerly extension, 342.26 feet to the centerline of said 80.00 foot roadway and utility easement, thence North 89 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds East, along said centerline, 17.39 feet, thence continue along said centerline, 64.41 feet Easterly along a tangential curve, concave southerly, having a central angle of 12 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds and a radius of 300.00 feet, thence South 78 degrees 33 minutes 14 seconds East, along said centerline, tangent to curve, 159.19 feet, thence 63.27 feet easterly along said centerline on a tangential curve, concave northerly, having a central angle of 12 degrees 05 minutes 02 seconds and a radius of 300.00 feet, thence North 89 degrees 21 minutes 44 seconds East, along said centerline, 18.25 feet to the actual point of beginning. 21 217248v1 87 EXHIBIT "B" IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Develooer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. , dated , 2 , of (Name of Bank) if b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2007. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. Its 22 217248v1 88 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, which mortgage is dated and recorded with the Wright County Recorder/Registrar of Titles as document number , agrees that the Development Contract and Planned Unit Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 2021. By STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF ) Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2021, by the of , on behalf of the ,a Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ day of [print name] [title] 23 217248vl City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2M. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-57 calling for a public hearing on July 22, 2024, for vacation of drainage and utility easements as legally described for a portion of Deephaven 3 Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Community Development Director 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Community & Economic Development City Clerk Coordinator ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-57 calling for a public hearing on July 22, 2024, for vacation of drainage and utility easements as legally described for a portion of the plat of Deephaven 3. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The proposed vacation is for a portion of drainage and utility easements within the plat of Deephaven 3 to facilitate the combination of two lots into a single development parcel. The easement to be vacated is the 12' drainage and utility easement lying between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 of the plat. All other drainage and utility easements within the plat are to remain. It is noted that there is an inaccuracy in a portion of the submitted petition's legal description, which the petitioners have been asked to correct. The petitioners propose to combine Lots 3 and 4 of Deephaven 3 into a single lot through an administrative lot combination. The lot is planned to be developed as a single building including a hotel, restaurant and quick -serve restaurant. The lot combination and Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Permit land use considerations will be moving forward to City Council on July 22, 2024. Deephaven Development LLC is the fee title owner of the parcels in which the current vacation is proposed, and the ownership submitted a petition for the vacation of the noted easements to accommodate the proposed lot combination and development within the site. Drainage and utility easements must be re-established per the City Engineer's office's direction. The City Engineer's office and Community Development Department will review the lot combination and development plans to verify all required public easements for drainage and utility purposes are in place. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 Procedurally, Council must call for a public hearing to consider the vacation. Statute requires fourteen days between the publication of notices and the public hearing itself. City staff prepared and sent notices to be published in the Monticello Times and notices will be sent to affected property owners. I. Budget Impact: The petitioner or their representative have provided the required vacation petition fee and escrow for consideration. II. Staff Workload Impact: Workload impact is expected at approximately 1-2 hours for review and recommendation on the vacation requests and platting. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The proposed plat and PUD will be evaluated for consistency with the 2040 Plan with the pending land use decisions. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend adopting the resolution and calling for the public hearing. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2024-57 B. Aerial Image C. Vacation Petition D. Plat of Deephaven 3 E. Proposed Site Utility Plan CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-57 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR DEEPHAVEN 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 4152.851, after two (2) weeks published and posted notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before a hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the vacation of drainage and utility easements for Deephaven 3 on Monday, July 22, 2024, at 6:30 PM at the Monticello City Hall: Legal Descriptions: The 12 foot wide utility and drainage easement lying between the boundary of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, depicted on Deephaven 3, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the vacation of such easements and a public hearing shall be held on such proposed vacation on the 22 day of July, 2024 before the City Council in the Council Chambers located at the Monticello Community Center at 6:30 p.m. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give published, posted, and mailed notice of such hearing as required by law. ADOPTED BYthe City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 24th day of June, 2024. 1411V961a LTA Is] \11Cy1[1CC Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Request for Vacation of a Portion of Drainage & Utility Easements for the Below Property PI D: 155-278-001030,155-278-001040 Lots 3 & 4, BIk 1 Deephaven 3 Created by: City of Monticello DocuSign Envelope ID: 6416F602-2F1 B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C DATE: June 13, 2024 TO: City Clerk City of Monticello To Whom it may Concern: Deephaven Development LLC, fee title property owner of {property address}, petition on behalf of Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC for the vacation of the 12' utility and drainage easement lying between the boundary of Lots 3 & 4, Block 1, of the Deephaven 3 Addition. Legal description: The drainage and utility easement across the East 6. 00 feet of Lot 8, Block 3, Cat -lisle Village 4'h Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying north of the South 12.00 feet thereof and lying southwest of the southwesterly line of the Northeasterly 6.00 feet of Lot 7 of said Block 3 extended northwesterly. Thank You, DocuSigned by: 6A4h('I� June 13, 2024 1 10:06 AM PDT LrU7 0C41Z... Property Owner's Signature DocuSign Envelope ID: 6416F602-2F1B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C It, nN B aco Wright County, M N Parcel ID 155278001030 Alternate ID n/a Sec/7wp/Rng 14-121-025 Class 233 - 3A COMMERCIAL LAND AND BUILDING Property Address Acreage 2.21 Acres District (1101) CITY OF MONTICELLO-0882 Brief Tax Description SECT-14 TWP-121 RANGE-025 DEEPHAVEN 3 LOT 3 BLOCK 1 (Note: Not to be used on legal documents) Date created: 6/13/2024 Last Data Uploaded: 6/13/2024 9:34:17 AM Developed by" Schneider GEOSPATIAL Eliminate property line and utility and drainage easement between lots 3 and 4 Overview Legend Highways Interstate --- State Hwy — US Hwy — Roads Road Labels City/Township Limits �c �t C ] Parcels Torrens Taxpayer Address n/a DocuSign Envelope ID: 6416F602-2F1B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C 3AINO NOW SVWOHl I F %lY . I n 4'3 O � w a b`2N803 b -- . Y i1 ca S Z£� D I 'ON avow urinOO oixi! a B o ------------------------- � ` Oi•t M.R AD.LC N CD, it f j 1 t I 1 I ------------------------- I 1 � ! , I I I 1 1 1 _ I ; 1 I ; 1 , I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I_______________ ----------------------- r---------------- 1 L t- ------------ -. '.__-----_-----------� ' I � ! 1 I -------------------'. I � 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I f I • O • I t I i 1 � 1 i < r I I I Q I I ! 1 1 C W m O I a 1 w 1 1 I I 1 1 ry qj ! MaD. :aN ; t � 1 1 ; I 1 j R t7 I 1 I m f ! Ci ; I /brit 1 #mm.ws nwi momaw-3dmm- a'._-_.-._--._--._--.___._--.-._._ Q i I -_-_----1-, i ! it_________________________ j ' � ! r I r I I ; 1 � u p1•0"was1� N z $F N O €ot- la U.j.I I $ r r - U MIN W G U DocuSign Envelope ID: 6416F602-2F1 B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C CITY C�OF Monticeflo Applicant Name: Office Use Only Application Date: APPLICANT CHECK CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Vacation Petition (763)-295-2711 community.development(a.ci.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist Application Review Date: APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CITY CHECK -IN A completed City of Monticello Land Use Application form, including full legal description of property Completed checklist form (this document) with all required items from below Written petition for vacation, signed by the applicant and property owner. Petition must include an accurate legal description of the area to be vacated. Current certificate of survey (within 6 months) for affected parcels, showing existing conditions and structures and existing and proposed lot lines. General grading and drainage information. Utilities (water, sewer, storm sewer, and service connections). All existing and proposed required easements. Minimum building setback lines, including accessory buildings. If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application or after approval of the vacation. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above Submit electronic sets via flash/jump drive or .ftp only Application fee and escrow per Land Use Application form Base Plan Set Requirements One (1) Reduced Plan set —11" x 17" Electronic copies of all Plan sets — submit electronic sets via flash/jump drive or .ftp only *If application is incomplete, full set of revised submittals are required for re -submittal of application. Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the Community Development Department. Revised 2023 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6416F602-2F1 B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 28 days prior to the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting, per the submission schedule maintained by the Community Development Department. Application submittals are due by 4 p.m. on the deadline date. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Applicants will be notified in writing when their application is considered complete. Applicants may be asked to supply additional information beyond required list above. A public hearing will be scheduled only when it has been verified that the application is complete. A complete application will be scheduled for an Application Review meeting between staff and the applicant, which typically occurs one week prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Review Process • After a petition for vacation is received, the petition shall be placed on the next Council agenda for consideration to call for a public hearing on the petitioned vacation. • If Council calls for the hearing, required notices shall be published and the hearing shall be held no less than two weeks following publication. • Before any vacation is considered, the City Council shall hold at least one public hearing after proper notice has been issued. • Following the hearing and subsequent discussion on the merits of the proposal, the Council shall adopt findings and recommendations related to the subject vacation. • Denial of vacation shall be supported by findings of fact as to why the request was denied. • If the request is approved, a resolution supporting the vacation shall be recorded at the Office of the Wright County Recorder. Revised 2023 MAIM- mo,!= DEEPHAVEN 3 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and that Valley View Townhomes, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, as tenants in common and fee owners of the following described property situated in the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota to wit: Outlot A, DEEPHAVEN 2, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as DEEPHAVEN 3 and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, ha caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this Z11h day of Naffmofy . 20 Z Signed: Deephaven Development, LLC Mark Buchhoresident STATE OF N i I n 901 K01-0 COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this ? thday of Vf M)7(Y , 20 by Mark Buchholz, President of Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, CO S My commission expires t 7 IZC, erfifYu p (Notary Printed Name) County, my 1 yl lw y q-va In witness whereof said Valley View Townhomes, LLP, a Minnesota limited liabil' partnershi , has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 1/ , 20 Signed: Valley View Townhomes LLP Dale Buchholz, Managing Partner STATE OF WYM DAPIA COUNTY OF C OIL This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1Nq1 1 Ttt" 20 by Dale Buchholz, Managing Partner of Valley View Townhomes, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, on behalf of the partnership. Jftt-svv-- � (Notary Signature) Notary Public, My commission expires 1-1 8 K-LD m-ra—wriv (Notary Printed Name) SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I Samuel J. DeLeo do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this D�- Od day of I`tot/i?rj%01r• , 20 %` - Samuel J. DeLeo, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 40341 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS The foregoing Surveyor's Certification was acknowledged before me this :�-BPa day of Vi eV As- i s,- , 20 � by Samuel J. DeLeo, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License Number 40341. Sidney Theis . Notary Public Stearns County, Minnesota My commission expires January 31, 2027 CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Be it known that at a meeting held on this 4414 A day of %jAV1M 20 , the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, did hereby 6view and approve this- tat of DEEPHAVEN 3. t � By: Chairperson fix: I Secretary CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of DEEPHAVEN 3 was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day 16 O'C F C'V a0'0"0 of -1 20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Mayor City Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021 Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this J day of February 20 9. Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY LAND RECORDS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20_ -�3 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sectionuu272.12 there are no delinq nt taxes and transfer entered this tl($ day of 20 . ?A11 aluki" I %-I tp-A V right Coun Land Records Administrator WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this day of � , 2023, atjD o'clock P . M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. I , Sleeve R5a3 , as Document No. tv'7, Wright- C my Recorder KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING BRAINERD ST. CLOUD Sheet No. 1 of 2 Sheets C+� t U a.-k Plat DEEPHAVEN 3 / A/ 4 .' �•, . •• ` ` / T • i.r• I Not Tangent °�'`� X `�--——— — — —- / . , to , No Scale r wo w / ♦ r r ♦ I •»::..... :.�. r / / / .\ « r 3 "p \ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •• '� U.1 ry \ ' .: 1 — — —North Quarter comer of Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 i (Cast Iron Monument) t 1 �,:,r :,r : : : S,r : •S .5 ' L"v'i' i 18 ° 19' 38" : < •��• �; ,q� , R= 698.00 Cg: L= 223.27 Z - - - �`' CH- 222.32°02' 47' W S 88 ° 47' 24" W 643.05 ` ` :.„ ; ~: ~ / // ' S• J>►.':N'° =16F -1,l--13900 — — -------_.�—_ �— `'——N—o—— — — — — — — — — — I I — — — — — — — 1 t9I 50268 "3`00. Drainage &Utility Easement 41.00 •I n 1.000W 1 -- *_ -- - ��o _ frt�x;.•.;. •'''•' .,:::w «'• wv, too Z THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS TO a •. :;..• / �'�,, ( I o • ' z BE DEDICATED AS PART OF THIS PLAT ARE SHOWN AS THUS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: a•» •�,, ^)/ I I REAR LOT LINE �•t, • ^r/ 2 I I N 1 d I 4 ' ` N \•••• LLI S�--F I Cd ..;. ...z r f' I g I N�,° UNE I I ::.: «. . ,r; j / I I$ 1 1 BLOCK 1 I I o. -1 IZ ROAD 141 toti/'` \ S,4j� �•�,. �•'�=.�,. �3`'a ' i .. I I f0orn�m�tEasement DNENSIONSARE IN FEET •00 163,7�........ or dy age aid utility purposes • per Doc. No. 697451CB"1CH= 1E64362. Not 100 LM'I' y / 1'`•. `— I,' �It — — —— 275.81 Tangent ---Z ----_ _ -----� —420.47 I » : a. _ .,i I I N 88° 40' 21" E 831.87 :• / hg - - Not Tangen �� T { --' ; ; (� M I - - - - North -South Quarter Section Line /Per a�F$r -- `------------------------------•----i---..__ f-• I I 3 I �.- 1 Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 s / NO143�F� �- -- I - �$ �'�'` -See Detail A o I M I Ln r / Z I I I O/ � • I p CL 1100 1 E 1 I -- - - - - - - - - ---------- ,/ / ,,� I In LA 3 1 / / 1 I 1• -- . . M N • ' qR in �C3 / / �, / , z J. •------ - - - - -- r N 89 coo, 49 E 266 CIO 33 r N I 1 „ti r eV I I I ..l„ 1 .•••. � Q Z I I I - - - - -I ',49.07--.° '--------------------------r-------1--------------------- _ ...� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I ?, �;r I _ ---- N 89°00' 49" E 1003.40 1^ I 1 Z: N 89.00' 47" E (CEDAR STREET ADDITION) I r • •. I .r r •� ' I NOPT PLa I -I ? '•� t ' '\'•• 1 Vicinity Map NM'I' 01 A I'IEI� •••• :»•: •• •: »• .: i :«• :« : �'.:.r :.r :. • :.r : 't I M ., % I R I I I \o ',•t• a 01 "'o K---.LD KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING BRAINERD 3T. CLOUD ' MU'!1 Of I' A 1 cn I c I I 66 I - - - - LEGEND OF PROPERTY BOUNDARY SYMBOLS I �Z O IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED 'DELEO 40341" TO BESET I • FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 60 120 South Quarter corner of 10 Q GOVERNMENT SECTION CORNER MONUMENT Note: The underlying property defined by this plat of DEEPHAVEN 2 is subject to a blanket temporary easement for public pathway or trail purposes per document number 1432430. THE NORTH -SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SEC. 14, TWP. 121, RNG. 25 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 00*00' 32" WEST SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 60 FEET Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 i (Cast Iron Monument) - - ; • �Project I Location SEC 14, Tl 121, RNG 25 a W Z 0 J a NO SCALE Sheet No. 2 of 2 Sheets EXISTING 0I ° • ° ^ ° ° e ` ° ° ° ° ° ° °°. o e EXISTING HYDRANT HYDRANT S CLEANOUT W/ RISER (SSCO2)-- v > -- - - > RIM = 963.90 r+r >> TOP INV OF RISER = 954.19 < --- r BOTTOM INV OF RISER = 947.15 ` - - FtA -J- FM " EXISTING / __=_ •- FM / - FI r / HYDRANT FM / CONNECT TO EXISTING ° : ° ° ' - tit' _------- FM / I O I I is DIP WATER STUB FM ow --- ------i- - - 131.00 - a I ------ - /-- ``i I I- J� -- ---------------- ----- --- -- �\ ----- i -----/ raina e 8 Wit Eas men - COIJNEC TO E CISTIN \ - �-� \ --- -+�- I I o / d 8" PI/C SAN. SEVER S 'UBEA - I o l o INV 947.15 \6\° l I lo o �a=-�5 FIELD VEFdFY) �� I 8" 45° BEND III ��/ _ - INV= 951.25 _ Q $„ DIP \ LEI ---- G °� I I �14 CI III I I I I I I DPI l I I CLEANOUT c!_11� 962 (2) 8" I45 I ° °° ° ° • I - = -RIM = 963.9� BENDS I \ ` \ 963.31 N 88 ° 47' 24" E 139.00 INV = 955.55 959.38 I I %o / I I I ,9 1996 \ �. SOT Z9 �� I 1 � 6- t ��, - - - - < �° �� I I I I ) I �I I 8" 450 BEND CD II /` " ) o ! ! ° i _F I I I 1 8" DIP COMBINED WATER l I I I SERVICE W/ 8" GATE 8" PVC SAN. SERVICE / I \ I INV @ BLDG = 956.35 i I i VALVE &BOX I ' PROPOSED BUILDING I I I PROPOSED BUILDING I \ l FFE - 964.85 I I FFE = 964.85 w41 I I I I 966 I - - J I I I b I Iro on cy, .a -ADJUST EXISTING MANH LE o I I I I I NEW RIM = 964.50 BRIM= 964.24 I _ � , I I RIM= 964.01 \ RIM= 965.59 /��j�j�� I I � INV E W= V950.1 � - I ip / I - = I � I - . �4 2�1 I NV 953.99 INV E/W 951.69 � I I RIM 96 INV= 958.14 I = 45L.b� �1 11 - INV f`52.b9 c I I I I 6- iNv INV= 949 2 l - ----C-loo ------------ ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE IT)I��\II{\ l I I I J - - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - + -- -- - ---- NEW RIM=967.00 S I I . F - \\ I - I - -�� -fi�� - -- -- -- -- - -- I - -- -- ----- -� I ---- I _ _ - �_ _ -- ---- -- * i • - _ - - _ - - -- - --- -_r ----------------- _ - I ------ ---- _ � I I --� }----------- - -----------.------------------------- !� ressFasement I I I 0368I 5 I *_J/�' I ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE NEW RIM = 964.75 EXISTING L _ ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE I ( EXISTING 111 HYDRANT �� NEW RIM = 963.70 l HYDRANT T NOTE: EXISTING ST I RIM= 964,'0 RIM= 3.97 I ) ITRANSFORMER TO INV-- 9 I INV= 955. 7 " RELOCATED. RIM= 964.43 I 88 .26 . I INV= 959.98 INV= 958.00 v RIM= 964.88 � �i _F_INV= 961.73 l UTILITY NOTES: 1. WATER MAIN AND ANY WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 2. IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED WHERE WATER MAIN OR SERVICES CROSS EXISTING OR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, SERVICE LINES, OR STORM SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RAISED OR LOWERED APPROPRIATELY WHILE STILL MAINTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 3. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM SEWER CROSSES SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, OR ASSOCIATED SERVICES. INSULATION SHALL CONSIST OF AN 8-FT X 8-FT SQUARE OF 3"-THICK RIGID INSULATION. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE STORM SEWER AND PIPE CROSSING WITH THE EDGES OF THE INSULATION PARALLEL TO THE PIPING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. 4. INSTALL TRACER WIRE ALONG PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPE AS PER MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. https://www.mrwa.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/TracerW ireSpecGuideFi nalwebll.pdf 5. SEE SHEET C5 FOR STORM SEWER ELEVATIONS AND SLOPE, AND SHEET C2 & C3 FOR STANDARD DETAILS RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR STATE PLUMBING REVIEW, AND OBTAIN AN APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT FROM MNDLI, PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AFTER THE APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND ANY AND ALL PERTINENT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS AND IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO ORDER UTILITY MATERIALS AFTER APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM MNDLI It N O N C7 O O w W W J SCHULTZ ENGINEERING CID & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 5; PH: (320) 339-0669 (� FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Cr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS F- OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 Ir 0 O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 QREVISIONS Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS © SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN UTILITY PLAN SCALE: 1 "=30' 1 I 1 0 30 60 C9 City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2N. Consideration of authorizing WSB to provide engineering services for the CSAH 39 West Utility Extension Proiect at a total cost of $171,427 Prepared by: Assistant City Engineer Reviewed by: Public Works Director/City Engineer, Finance Director, Community Development Director ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date: 6/24/2024 Approved by: City Clerk ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to authorize a contract with WSB for engineering services for the CSAH 39 West Utility Extension Project for a total cost of $171,427. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION November 13, 2023: City Council adopted Resolution 2023-94 authorizing submittal of the $1,000,000 CET grant application. June 10, 2024: City Council adopted Resolution 2024-48 authorizing a Grant Agreement with MN -DEED for a Community Energy Transition (CET) Grant in the amount of $1,000,000 for extension of municipal trunk sewer and water lines along County Road 39 West to serve the Northwest Growth Area. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Community Energy Transition Grant program was created by the Minnesota legislature to support communities that host large electric generating facilities as they address the economic dislocation created by future plant closures. The City received a $1 million CET grant administered through MN DEED for the extension of sewer and water utilities to the west along CSAH 39 which would promote development. The Strategic Transition Plan identified the Northwest Growth Area as the best option for increased tax base to reduce the reliance on the Xcel nuclear power generating facility. This project would extend water and sewer utilities west along CSAH 39 from the intersection of Chelsea Road and CSAH 39 with the goal of extending the utilities to the first large developable property west along CSAH 39 as shown in the attached RFP. City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 A request for proposals was posted on the City's and League of MN Cities websites and five proposals were received. The not -to -exceed costs ranged from $171,427 to $430,847 for these proposals. WSB had the lowest qualified proposal and included all required proposal components, including project design and construction administration and inspection. The project schedule anticipates a bid date in the winter of 2024 with construction starting in the spring of 2025 and completion in late summer. Staff are coordinating with Wright County on this project as part of their planned pavement preservation project scheduled for 2025. Initial indication is that the pavement preservation project could be delayed until 2026 to minimize the impacts from the two projects. I. Budget Impact: Costs incurred for the project in 2024 will be paid from the Water and Sewer Funds' professional services budget. The City is required to provide a local match of 50%, which will be used to fund the proposed engineering services. This project is included in the current CIP for 2025 construction. The total project budget is anticipated as follows: Engineering/Material Testing - $200,000 Right-of-way acquisitions - $100,000 Construction - $2,200,000 a. The project would be funded from a $1 million MN DEED Grant with the remaining project costs being funded from the sewer and water trunk funds. II. Staff Workload Impact: City staff will be involved throughout this project. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The 2040 Plan recognizes the Northwest Area as a key area for future growth. With the completion of the Industrial Feasibility analysis, the Northwest Area further solidified the area's growth potential. Development of utility plans and their extension is in direct support of the following 2040 strategy: Consider a more detailed planning initiative for the Northwest and East Bertram Study Areas to better define land use, utility and transportation corridors and needs, which can be incorporated into finance and capital improvement plans. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends proceeding with authorizing a contract with WSB for engineering services on this project. • CSAH 39 West Utility Extension Project RFP m ( 1 5 1% 0306. . , -3+89 4.. + ,14++ "+ 1 -37. ,.+3 „3 +,. +7. .... .34-3+ 3+ 7. 3.. 117.133.. +3..&3 1'&.. +".8+9 3 + - 1 +3.. 1.1 3 -3.." 1 3;<$. " &=&$; . .+1 3.. 3+3( . 1 + 3' * + ,.3 ., + ". 1 -3 13 3'3. 6 6. ° 03 &(" (%3"&""1 " 03&( /'31 &3"""' 111.3> 31113+ 31. &3 13 3&'3 " 13? & 4+ ., ++ ".. & ' 3%"". +3+1 -3 133.. " .. +'33 3.. %"+. . 3+ "+3 3 4+ . A .+3.." + 113 '33+ if -3.++ ,�� ,� _;&$; P3 ++3+ "&37. 1713 +'3=; 3"+3 00, -3 "'+.. 17.'3 + + 3. 63+ 5 $;'3 7.3 +$#" ,,,, + $# - 10 -33 + 3 '3. ' +3 - $!#2 & * - 31 ,( -3. ++ "'. 1 1 .&& -3. 6.+'< -..31+.6 %1 3".3. 6 % 1 A.+ ..&.+& " + 37+ 1, '%(@:3 1 1.3" 11 3373 ". 6 B 1. '3 3 3+'. it + '3 3?..1 ". 1. 6%(@: 3+ $# '3 33 ."+3+3 3 "3 "73+ < "737.+ 3 o 3, "3+0 o *$$$$ o *$$$:$ o *$$$:$$ ('334+'1 '3C + 1 11 01''''+ +„ 4+ ..+ 4 31 1 + ,11 4 % +5 '3 ..33 63+ 1113 4 11+ + 1 + 112 + °3 -""A. 6 +37.1 " &+.&'3. 1 3 +' -3. 6'. 3++ -3. + „ ,3 3++ 4 (( 1# 4( -3. 63 '3 3+ 3".'33+ 4 " - 1( „ $D:$D 1' ,,13+ ,,4+ " 3. 1 /'3".+ & + "3. 13 •+((+ .3" „+„ ,3 + „ -3+' A". E# .. 7";#" 3'+3. % 3% 3 F. ."#&$E 3" +E :;4 „ -3 A#$89*0% 3G5. (H+ "+1 "+ % 13.0 1 „+3 „ +„ +"" -3 713 +. -3 + 3 " +++ 3 ,,,, 1 + 11&13„,,, 1 , -3 „ + , 111 "v' +3 -31 2- ! & $! -3+'+ 3 < 04+ .0 $&$; , *.33++ - +( 3 -3. ".+ 3 65 &$# 2- %& $! 5- *4 3 4+ .. 36+3 4+ < !"# (.&4& .3 *3 ++ .& 3 ++ 430P. "+ ++ , 4" + 6- 1, + " < *+ „ 61 6(.. 3 1 . 6"7. 1 %3 1 ((*+ "2 1 - 1 + ( 1 •+3' *+ it + „ +3 +3 ?+ „ „+„&+& ..+3.6 61 (1111 +37 +3 , 6(.. 3 1.+.. WWI. 3'A ".331."+3. 6& 3' .3 *3?.. 3 6"7. *+3. 6111111 3 + 3.6;*111111+„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i,i,l ... 3".3. 6 31. &3%"" "& & 4 % 3. '. 1 + '3.. ' 43% """31 + "?.. 2+ 111111 3. -3 „.,+ "3 1 ".3 oho"" -37. 13+= *_ p+ %"+...3 + "+3 3 4+ ...+ 3.." +11313 3+"-3 1 336..&'1 3... "3? $* 7/ $$& $! * 33+ "' 3 + 6 &3&+ "&'33" + " 3 &'33 3. 3"+ ". (9 ". 31) <,*6 . "B&$$$&$$$3 ,9 ( <,*6 • "B&$$$&$$$3 K". 31) 1 (" 1 ""'3 "+1 7" 1 1 (9 ". 31* <1 + ..".3 + "' 3 -3 33"+B#$$&$$$+ 3 & 33 " 3" 4 3" '+ 3%+&'331 ,9 ". 31)*<1 6.." 1+< 9 *6 +' &..&& " .. '3 ++3 &'33 .. 1 9 .+ 6 7.3'33' 3. +„ 9 6 " 9 („-*<1 6..„ +" 134."&13 3 '3 & 6'3' 3 9 ".5. * <1 3".+ 1 + ". 31) -3+3( * 3 ++* -3 3" ++* 35' 3"+7+3% 1 313+ 3 8$9. '+3 1 (1+ 1 &35' "& +.&.++' 1,+ 113 ". +3 3 ..+ + 3.+. +3 E STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT AGREEMENT DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OFFICE OF ENERGY TRANSITION Community Energy Transition Grant Contract Agreement Grant No: CETG-MO-24 Northwest Growth Area Utility Extensions This grant contract agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through the Department of Employment and Economic Development, Business and Community Development Division, Office of Energy Transition (STATE) and City of Monticello ("GRANTEE"). Recitals l . Under Minn. Stat. � 116J.55 the State is empowered to enter into this grant. 2. The State is in need of programs to do the following: address the economic dislocation associated with the closure of a local electric generating plant. 3. The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant contract agreement to the satisfaction of the State. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 16B.98, Subd. 1, the Grantee agrees to minimize administrative costs as a condition of this grant contract agreement. Grant Contract Agreement Term of Grant Contract Agreement 1.1 Effective date: May 1, 2024, or the date the State obtains all required signatures, or whichever is later. Per Minn. Stat.� 1613.98, Subd. 5, the Grantee must not begin work until this grant contract agreement is fully executed and the State's Authorized Representative has notified the Grantee that work may commence. Per Minn. Stat. � 1613.98 Subd. 7, no payments will be made to the Grantee until this grant contract agreement is fully executed. 1.2 Expiration date: June 30, 2025, or, until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. 1.3 Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant contract agreement: 8. Liability; 9. State Audits; 10. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; 12. Publicity and Endorsement; 13. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 15 Data Disclosure. 2 Grantee's Duties The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will: Comply with required grants management policies and procedures set forth through Minn. Stat. � 1613.97, Subd. 4 (a) (1). Perform the following duties and provide the deliverables as outlined below. (a) Administer these grant funds in accordance with Minn. Stat. & 116J.55 and the application submitted on November 15, 2023, for funding for the City's Northwest Growth Area Utility Extensions Project, which is incorporated into this grant contract agreement and the provisions of this grant contract agreement. Any modification made to the approved application must be approved by the State. (b) Promptly notify the State of any proposed material change in the scope of the project as submitted in the grant application, budget as defined in Section 4.1(a) below, or entire project's completion date, which must be approved by the State, prior to implementation. (c) Provide evidence to the State prior to the closeout of the grant that the budgeted activities in Section 4.1(a) below have been completed. (d) Adhere to all other requirements of this grant contract agreement. 3 Time The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant contract agreement. In the performance of this grant contract agreement, time is of the essence. 4 Consideration and Payment 4.1 Consideration. The State will pay for all services performed by the Grantee under this grant contract agreement as follows: (a) Compensation The Grantee will be Activities Utility Rate Study Project Engineering Project Bidding Start Construction TOTAL le costs in the table below: Amount $12,500 $475,000 $12,500 $500,000 $1,000,000 (b) Total Obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the Grantee under this grant contract agreement will not exceed $1,000,000. 4.2 Payment (a) Invoices The State will disburse funds to the Grantee pursuant to this Contract, based upon payment requests submitted by the Grantee and reviewed and approved by the State. Payment requests must be accompanied by supporting invoices that relate to the activities in the approved budget. The State will provide payment request forms. Invoices may be submitted on a monthly basis; however, at a minimum, an invoice for an award shall be submitted by the grantee for expenses incurred 25 days after the end date of the state fiscal year of June 30th. In order to ensure that all funds are drawn prior to the expiration date of the grant, all payment requests must be received at least 30 days prior to the grant -term expiration date. (b) Unexpended Funds The Grantee must promptly return to the State any unexpended funds that have not been accounted for annually in a financial report to the State due at grant closeout. 4.3 Contracting and Bidding Requirements (a) Any services and/or materials that are expected to cost $100,000 or more must undergo a formal notice and bidding process. (b) Services and/or materials that are expected to cost between $25,000 and $99,999 must be competitively awarded based on a minimum of three (3) verbal quotes or bids. (c) Services and/or materials that are expected to cost between $10,000 and $24,999 must be competitively awarded based on a minimum of two (2) verbal quotes or bids or awarded to a targeted vendor. (d) The grantee must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that targeted vendors from businesses with active certifications through these entities are used when possible: i. State Department of Administration's Certified Targeted Group, Economically Disadvantaged and Veteran -Owned Vendor List ii. Metropolitan Council Underutilized Business Program: MCUB: Metropolitan Council Underutilized Business Program iii. Small Business Certification Program through Hennepin County, Ramsey County, and City of St. Paul: Central Certification Directory (e) The grantee must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. (fl The grantee must maintain support documentation of the purchasing or bidding process used to contract services in their financial records, including support documentation justifying a single/sole source bid, if applicable. (g) Notwithstanding (a) - (d) above, the State may waive bidding process requirements when it is determined there is only one legitimate or practical source for such materials or services and that grantee has established a fair and reasonable price. (h) For projects that include construction work of $25,000 or more, prevailing wage rules apply per Minn. Stat. ��177.41 through 177.44. These rules require that the wages of laborers and workers should be comparable to wages paid for similar work in the community as a whole. (i) The grantee must not contract with vendors who are suspended or debarred in MN: https://mn. aov/admin/osp/government/suspended-debarred/index2.i sp 5 Conditions of Payment All services provided by the Grantee under this grant contract agreement must be performed to the State's satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of the State's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 6 Authorized Representative The State's Authorized Representative is Mike McCrownsey, Grants Specialist Coordinator, Office of Energy Transition DEED, phone 651-259-7037, email mike.mccrownsevastate.mn.us, or his/her successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee's performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this grant contract agreement. If the services are satisfactory, the State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. The Grantee's Authorized Representative is Angela Schumann, 505 Walnut St, Suite 1, Monticello MN 55362, Phone 763-295-2711, email anaela.schumann(&ci.monticello.mn.us. If the Grantee's Authorized Representative changes at any time during this grant contract agreement, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. 7 Assignment Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Contract Agreement Complete 7.1 Assignment The Grantee shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant contract agreement without the prior written consent of the State, approved by the same parties who executed and approved this grant contract agreement, or their successors in office. 7.2 Amendments Any amendments to this grant contract agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original grant contract, or their successors in office. 7.3 Waiver If the State fails to enforce any provision of this grant contract agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or the State's right to enforce it. 7.4 Grant Contract Agreement Complete This grant contract agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 8 Liability The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney's fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this grant contract agreement by the Grantee or the Grantee's agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant contract agreement. 9 State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd.8, the Grantee's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Grantee or other party relevant to this grant contract agreement or transaction are subject to examination by the Commissioner of Administration, by the State granting agency and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this grant contract agreement, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period of time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, whichever is later 10 Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property Rights 10.1 Government Data Practices The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this grant contract agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. � 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the State. If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. The Grantee's response to the request shall comply with applicable law 10.2 Intellectual Property Rights The Grantee represents and warrants that Grantee's intellectual property used in the performance of this Contract does not and will not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of other persons or entities. Notwithstanding Clause 8, the Grantee will indemnify; defend, to the extent permitted by the Attorney General; and hold harmless the State, at the Grantee's expense, from any action or claim brought against the State to the extent that it is based on a claim that all or part of Grantee's intellectual property used in the performance of this Contract infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. The Grantee will be responsible for payment of any and all such claims, demands, obligations, liabilities, costs, and damages, including but not limited to, attorney fees. If such a claim or action arises, or in the Grantee's or the State's opinion is likely to arise, the Grantee must, at the State's discretion, either procure for the State the right or license to use the intellectual property rights at issue or replace or modify the allegedly infringing intellectual property as necessary and appropriate to obviate the infringement claim. This remedy of the State will be in addition to and not exclusive of other remedies provided by law. 11 Workers Compensation The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. � 176.181, Subd. 2, pertaining to workers' compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee's employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the State's obligation or responsibility. 12 Publicity and Endorsement 12.1 Publicity Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract agreement must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Grantee individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract. All projects primarily funded by state grant appropriations must publicly credit the State of Minnesota, including on the grantee's website when practicable. 12.2 Endorsement The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services. 13 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this grant contract agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant contract agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 14 Termination 14.1 (a) Termination by the State The State may immediately terminate this grant contract agreement with or without cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. (b) Termination by The Commissioner of Administration The Commissioner of Administration may unilaterally cancel this grant contract agreement if further performance under the agreement would not serve agency purposes or is not in the best interest of the State. 14.2 Termination for Cause The State may immediately terminate this grant contract agreement if the State finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this grant contract, that reasonable progress has not been made or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled. The State may take action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota, including the refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed. 14.3 Termination for Insufficient Funding The State may immediately terminate this grant contract agreement if. (a) It does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature. (b) Or, if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the Grantee. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the grant contract agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's receiving that notice. 14.4 Additional alternate termination language may be negotiated on a case -by -case basis after the state agency has consulted with their legal and finance teams. 15 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. � 270C.65, Subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.15 Signed: /�40:rl C GGAM&emi Date: 05/28/24 SWIFT Contract/PO No(s). 249909 PR 86375 PO 3-558810 2.GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant contract agreement on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: 3. STATE AGENCY By: (with delegated authority) Title: Date: Distribution: Agency Grantee State's Authorized Representative City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 20. Consideration of approving a lease agreement with Lunda Construction Company for the placement of a field office trailer for the MNDOT Highway 25 Mississippi River bridge re -decking proiect at 119 3rd Street East Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Public Works Director/City Engineer 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Finance Director City Clerk ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve a lease agreement with Lunda Construction Company for the placement of a field office trailer for the MNDOT Highway 25 Mississippi River bridge re -decking project at 119 3rd Street East. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Lunda Construction Company requested the use of the parking lot at 119 3rd Street East for a field office for the Mississippi River bridge re -decking project, which is scheduled to start construction on July 8, 2024. The term of the proposed lease would be four months beginning July 1, 2024, and ending October 31, 2024. The lease rate is $1,500 per month. Valley Paving is currently using this parking lot area for parking equipment and storing supplies while they complete the East Broadway improvement project. Their use is expected to end prior to Lunda Construction Company's use of the parking lot space. Due to the available space on that block, any overlap will not interfere with either company's use of the area. Lunda Construction Company would be responsible for supplying their own trailer for use as a field office and utilities to the field office as required. I. Budget Impact: Lease proceeds would be distributed to the City's capital projects fund. II. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time is expected from the lease agreement. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of a lease agreement with Lunda Construction Company. SUPPORTING DATA • Lease Agreement I " 23++2' 4.5"(6+7++ 8 ,0 8 ")$ $! 19 % &< )/=7# .29%4>#, !0 /%% # $! 19 8 ?% 8" 1 1 /< ; 0 9,#"'&&4 ! ,8"#@ 0 ""#"$ 9 1"88 %if< , %&' 8/084 '&&4 0 „ 9 9,,,, A%' 1 " 0 1 8" & % 1 B!"CO& 8 %90 0 "$ 0 ( &+-"./010 0 &'/'6! " ' /&; &# &%"' &4'; Im "' 4 & /& 8/ "' & 4 %"%8/0 & 0 9% % 0 8 % @ 0 &' #" &&' "' % &&'D8"' #' C2'6<%"& " &'0 0 ""' 0 M of &&77"&'<% " &0 8 % % &'' fill 1 C % <%; C' C 09""' "# %""3 1111 "%""3 &1 ' 0 0 """"2'6<% %C& 09"' ' /' " # F"' & " Fill' %', '%8"' 0, 6<% /& ! #& % # 7# %"'09, 0 0 % 08%(4D,&% %10 9 &' "' 'C2'6<% ' 'C2'6<% 0 8% % & '%"%.....<% E/B 1 & &%B&I 08% %'1811' 0 08%4& 9&' 09% "" &' &&' % 08% % ">E%$'0 +0 ! 0 8 " ' %"" 3 %&'#""C 0#& 3 " 3 &(4 D, &? %" "8%0 Im 20 '6%7, 6% 08 "& ?%% 6% %" & "' "%)$ # %' ?% ) 08#", 16%-181" '%1"8"1(4D,& &' &7 "%09, "'& "7#% #% &# ,0 0 "#$ '&' 3& '%"D# " &%& %" ,""#3 & "#%'' fill % ,@ % 8/ &8/; &'<%&& % 8/; '&88D ; '%118 8 &'#?% '% ; &%%& 8 /&'<% %" %& "8 88 D 8/; + & "& 8 / "%#; _ "8# & G & 3& '%D# "&%& %" "%' '&'>E%( 8/"8 8; ' %&8& &'# ?%"& &'#"8 %0 20 9 % ' ##"%' % ,063&'% 8D"'%) "%3& 0 , 0 6 & &'%" % '8%& #" % & ,0 +0 #( %"< WE & '%"4 B% %8 8D&'&&?%&&' =0)"$ 8D % 8/""3 ' 8/"%8 4#' &/&09, & #"% 8/08D If#`/ 0 8"% 8/" &' %G737 %&' '# ' '&4 8DO9' '/6!/6!0 20 8 " % ?%& / '%'"'3&13 %'0 ,0 8""4& # " "% 4"& 0 0 84& 8/% 8#"#' 88D%&' I[ /0 9, #11 I'll % %% 1 /&8/"80 % # "% & %8/%"< '8 E%3 & ' 8/ ' "8D3&" ' "'#'% "%" 0 D' #'0 3% " %'# 8 #" ' 3& #4 ?% && 08"&&' 8/09 8//&0 N. 0 #""$ F'#",8 # " " # ' 9 # % % "&OF&% 8#"%8/ # 3 &08"1 8&&8/ @&001 "0 0 "$ 9, &' /#% 8&%& 8/B /&0 0 11#-11#+$ 911# % I%' @ 0 8'&# % ; 20 8 "8/; ,0 8" # ?%8&% if %& 11,8%11 vigil %# 8 %# "& % %8" "'& %0 0 111111$ 6 M111 ,@ IQ W, % 0 (% 7 4& 8 /3'%8%8/ %' M, %#' D# 8; 20 993'% 8& 8/#'D# 8; ,0 94 '# ?%# & & & 0 0 0 If08% 8/' '8068& 8/ 9#8,8# " %&8/8 77%"< & '90 20 # $$ 09#"%" #"""%&,D% "8%,% ,&#"" '% , 0 930 8"&"&" %/&"30 %8"& !0 %$ & /&8/ 3 %"&0 9,8' #""&0 0 & 09") fillip % 50 ' &"'&"' I@ O,1 /%111111 (* 09"3 % 09#11% "%&8D% &%0 38/ 9"8% 0 09# % &' '#"# 09"' #111, %' # #'#)$0 11„%(, %$ 0 #' /01023++ 2' 4.5"(6+7++ 09' / is 0 60 $ + 1) 3" &&0 1 8 3% N K 3% 0 0 0 9.' If H&I H&'I )$$,-../-//01 /0/,-../-//01 3"$$4 /0 /2/$)$ OOffice Trailer Location G City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2P. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2023-49 accepting donations for the 2023 Walk & Roll event totaling $5,375 Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item City Clerk 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: N/A Approved by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-58 accepting donations for Walk & Roll. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND As required by state statute, the City Council must adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donations and their use. The City received multiple donations for the Walk & Roll event held on June 8. Donations were used for activities in the park and to purchase bikes for the giveaway. Below is a list of donors and the amounts they donated: Bike Sponsors • All Elements Roofing $400 • Blue Cross Blue Shield MN $400 • Central MN Mental Health Center New Bike • Dahlheimer Beverage $200 • Dan Olson —State Farm Insurance $200 • LeBrun Electric $200 • Mains'I Services $200 • Monticello Lions $1,000 • Monticello Senior Center $200 • Monticello Youth Football Association $200 • North Risk Partners $200 • Queen Bee's Gardens & Floral $200 • Riverwood Bank $200 • Sherburne State Bank $200 • TDS Telecom $200 • UMC $400 • Uptown Eye Care $200 City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 • Von Hanson's Meats $400 • Walmart Monticello $200 Donations • Colton Kratky for House $25 • Community Methodist Church $25 • Friends of Monticello Library $25 • Lucille Murray's Studio of Dance $25 • Jill Nelson Mary Kay $25 • Resurrection Lutheran Church $25 • Spirit 92.9 Radio $25 STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of the resolution accepting the donations. SUPPORTING DATA • Resolution 2024-58 City of Monticello RESOLUTION NO. 2024-58 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE WALK & ROLL FESTIVAL WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City for Walk & Roll; and WHEREAS, all listed contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the City's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION All Elements Roofing Cash Blue Cross Blue Shield Cash Central MN Mental Health Center New Bike Colton Kratky for House Cash Community United Methodist Church Cash Dahlheimer Beverage Cash Dan Olson — State Farm Insurance Cash Friends of Monticello Library Cash Le Brun Electric Lucille Murray's Studio of Dance Jill Nelson Mary Kay Mains'I Services Monticello Lions Monticello Senior Center Monticello Walmart Monticello Youth Football North Risk Partners Queen Bee's Gardens & Floral Resurrection Lutheran Church Riverwood Bank Sherburne State Bank Spirit 92.9 TDS Telecom UMC Uptown Eye Care Von Hanson's Meets Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash VALUE $400 $400 $200 $25 $25 $200 $200 $25 $200 $25 $25 $200 $1, 000 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $25 $200 $200 $25 $200 $400 $200 $400 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the purpose of the event Walk & Roll. Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 241" day of June, 2024. Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2Q. Consideration to approve Release of Development Contract and Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 5 Country Club Manor Third Addition and Partial Release from Development Contract and Planned Unit Development for Outlot A Country Club Manor Third Addition. Applicant: Headwaters/CHC Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Community Development Director 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A City Clerk ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve a Release of Development Contract and Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 5 Country Club Manor Third Addition and Partial Release from Development Contract and Planned Unit Development for Outlot A Country Club Manor Third Addition. PRIOR ACTION March 35, 2024: Approval of Preliminary Plat and Amendment to Planned Unit Development for Country Club Manor April 22, 2024: Approval of the Final Plat and Development Contract for Country Club Manor Fourth Addition REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND To facilitate the replatting and recording of the Country Club Manor Fourth Addition, releases for portions of property subject to previously recorded development contracts for Country Club Manor Third Addition are required. There are two releases for consideration. The first is a partial release for an outlot to be replatted from Third Addition into Fourth Addition. This area was planned as a stormwater facility. In this case, the partial release accommodates the ability for the outlot to be replatted as part of Fourth Addition, where it will continue to be used in the majority as stormwater facility. The stormwater parcels within Fourth Addition will be deeded to the City. The second is a full release for Lot 1, Block 5 of the Third Addition. Lot 1, Block 5 was previously approved by the City to be replatted from a single -lot for development as a multi -family building to 22 lots and 2 outlots for development as twinhomes. The development contract for Country Club Manor Fourth Addition and the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development for the entire project area will incorporate all required terms and City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 conditions for the development area, including the physical area of the releases. The Council previously approved both the Fourth Addition Development Contract and the PUD ordinance. The southerly development lots platted as Country Club Manor Third Addition, currently being developed as twinhomes, are not subject to the release and will continue to be subject to the Country Club Manor PUD and the Third Addition Development Contract and any amendments and assignments. I. Budget Impact: Minor, limited to the City Attorney's review of the documents prepared by the developer's attorney. Costs will be covered by the development escrows submitted with the plat. II. Staff Workload Impact: Approximately 1-2 hours was spent in the document review and report preparation. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: NA STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the releases. SUPPORTING DATA A. Partial Release, Outlot A Country Club Manor Third Addition B. Release, Lot 1, Block 5 Country Club Manor Third Addition C. Country Club Manor Third Addition Plat D. Country Club Manor Fourth Addition Plat PARTIAL RELEASE OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT June 28, 2024 The undersigned, for valuable consideration, does hereby forever discharge and release the tracts of land lying and being in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto from all claims, obligations and liens of and under: (a) that certain Development Contract and Planned Unit Development Agreement dated November 30, 2022, by and between the City of Monticello (the "City") and Headwaters Development LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Headwaters"), recorded on December 5, 2022 with the Wright County Recorder as Document # Al522159, which was assigned by Headwaters to CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("CHC"), pursuant to that certain Assignment and Assumption of Development Contracts dated as of November 30, 2022, by and among Headwaters, the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority, the City, and CHC, recorded on December 5, 2022, with the Wright County Recorder as Document #A1522163, and amended by that certain Development Contract and Planned Unit Development Agreement dated July 28, 2023 by and between the City and CHC, recorded on August 16, 2023, with the Wright County Recorder as Document # A1536347 (collectively, the "Phase I Development Agreement"). All other land encumbered by the Phase I Development Agreement and not specifically released herein shall remain encumbered by the Phase I Development Agreement. CITY OF MONTICELLO By Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of June, 2024, by , the of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 3500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Attention: Matt Sorensen EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land herein referred to is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota and is described as follows: Outlot A, Country Club Manor Third Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota Abstract Property 291751oavl RELEASE OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT June 28, 2024 The undersigned, for valuable consideration, does hereby forever discharge and release the tracts of land lying and being in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto from all claims, obligations and liens of and under: (a) that certain Development Contract and Planned Unit Development Agreement dated November 30, 2022, by and between the City of Monticello and Monticello MF West LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, recorded on December 5, 2022 with the Wright County Recorder as Document # Al522162. CITY OF MONTICELLO By Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of June, 2024, by , the of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 3500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Attention: Matt Sorensen EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land herein referred to is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota and is described as follows: Lot 1, Block 5, County Club Manor Second Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota Abstract Property 29174992v1 0�-�� a aI 01 OL COUNTRY CLUB MANOR THIRD ADD T ON _ NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH LINE OF THE NW114 / SECTION 10, T.121, R.25. OF SECTION 10, T.121, R.25 S89°10'28"E OF QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 10, T.121, R.25 86.84 \ N89°10'28"W 2562.25 K A/'1N ITI/\r-I I r,\ \.L_U V IL_ yy I L_I \I IVI\JI v I IuL_L_L_\JI I -, I s I v I I \ I r�nl I�)T I I I I I I A I '�I /I�l� �I I I I I 0 L-\-f v r oe N Ar—^r \ T60 � so 60 I I I I I I I I I 80Lij I I I I --------------- I —_j-----�--- \ l v 1 1\ I r: " t�_' I ,� I I fi r) I �� A -I � ` i/ I ( � I ------ LI-I -------1------------- � in I 7 o I I " / I I I'� I iv \J L _ V L� I - LIJ 1 1 I— L.L4 \ ( /,/CIS r I 1 ��' \ I ----- — L----- -r _ 141 �� 5 s00009• ,�Ro�9 — — — — — — N79`5418"E tl 00 t ' \ / I . \ DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON p N CV ALL OF OUTLOT A / I \ �o \ / \// I I Iv I i S2 ► \ I 3 �L�, // I A A A K 1AF) I \\---------- rI 10 \ I 1vl,l v\L�I I 11 X OUTLOT 5 / 1 / ^ O ,�, / \ 6 _, Lij Lij 2 /'L9 ti,r G� 9 O a'o� i�� \ / `` .Y, _� I �J LIJ 'boo 3 c;61 ti 'o°. '�/�� 10 �a C� , / _ �_) I LI_I — J / , 0,9 GTZ.�, Q7e°. ^ �9CS �� I ,\l/ L��7 �/ ----J� QA °as °<<� `rF�'? ��'�T 12 rY; \ I ( ;, J 1` v o v / < 13 11 14 C �. I 0r Zo 16 IC In L T- `\ s� 10 O °c�� 1718 �6 3, Co �R4-7T1l 12 '30060 64I ^T_)r--r-T ►yAytr-^_TI\LLI ?0 jziS88°5052"E 322413 3 R=271.Os0 �, 94.0714 7 P/', ryI';!� BLOCK 215 2 93 4 5 6�7 8 9 10 so\ \ II I I II \ \\ IIIII ' \ 17 S8z g' R,s22 RA/NgGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK 2 N� �\ �9 18 19 4c4)°SO 43 L'188.110°37'17" N88°50-52"w 208.25 Zs,. \ ` ` "'O ,qB p /o L \ 20 ) o m s.ss °�°,,� a N88°50'S2"W 171.05 J v� \ `s�'• 21 ��i�°J O 1 11 �. °hh �� DELINEATED WETLANDdy21 \I \� \ �o �0 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 CH BRG-OUTLOT C r, v v i -i I v DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF OUTLOT C VICINITY MAP , \ DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK lb- __ — — — 631.97 _ NOT TO SCALE / / \ _ -_ = 88°50'52"W 1035.15 \ --Tr-�) /�I-)r71:71� i C.S.A.H. NO.39 / ul \v..:..:ll V\7 ..1 I r1 \ A f'1nITInN I + � FAIRWAY R. !G� hQ- SITE- ALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN OUTLOT A, OUTLOT B, OUTLOT C, LOT 21 OF BLOCK 1, LOT 11 OF BLOCK 2, LOT 11 OF BLOCK 3 AND LOT 21 OF BLOCK 4, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION HAVE BEEN VACATED PER DOC. NO. 15 3 lo343 —SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT C, \ COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION BEARING ORIENTATION: THE SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT C, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION, 1S ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 88°50'52'WEST 0 100, 200' 1 INCH = 100 FEET SCALE IN FEET ® = DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT • = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT O = DENOTES 1/2 INCH DIAMETER BY 18 INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Outlot A, Outlot B, Outlot C, Lots 1-21 of Block 1, Lots 1-11 of Block 2, Lots 1-11 of Block 3 and Lots 1-21 of Block 4 all in COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as COUNTRY CLUB MANOR THIRD ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness, whereof, said CHC Monticello Townhomes a Minnesota limited li bility comps as caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of . a 20 Signed: CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC Isleyy J. Butler, Executive Director STATE OF In."AW 415 0 rA COUNTY OF1>0 IkO Z74' This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 1 V % 20212by Wesley J. Butler, Executive Director, CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. -. _ ignature DP44402t,& print Notary Public, O T %4— County, Minnesota My commission expires / I, Jonathan D. Schuette do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this 2% day of Jt!(..Y 2013. D _ Jonathan D. Schuette, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 45352 STATE OF 0))NMEC0111""A /. COUNTY OF DA" 0e- The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me on this.2 day of , V ,20A-Sby Jonathan D. Schuette, a Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 45352. .`r ¢-_ signature AQ Ij CLiNfMZ-OS print Notary Public, _t>yArA o 7 County, Minnesota My commission expires CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Be it known that at a meeting held on this day of 20_14 the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, did hereby review and approve this plat of COUNTRY CLUB MANOR )ADDITION. Char person Secrets CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of COUNTRY CLUB MANOR THIRD ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello at a regular meeting thereof held this, day of C1 V-h6 , 20" and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. mzyor City Clerk ® WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accords cg with Minne to Statutes, ection 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this ,Iay of 20 13�69L Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY LAND RECORDS 2 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20013 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also pLL&uant to Minnesota Stages, Sectio.n127722.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of 20 R Wright County nd Records Administrator WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER tv% I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this 10 day of AV I- ,, 20o*N3 at D• 45 o'clock.& M. and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. Sleeve �J , as Document No. 1,5 3 b3ti4lo W U)&— ght Co Recorder DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING SHEET 1 OF 2 SECTION 10, T. 121, R. 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN 1 � ro DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF OUTLOT A 041 G, 0'� P I at COUNTRY CLUBlMA\40R TH :RD ADDIT ON \ rNI I ITS)\/ / �L/LJI V I I\ I `r // N0 //� \ // r , A ^)I' u lJ lJ 1 V 1 / 1 1 \ I •• / / / / '� 1 /\ I A \ ir-\ I r \ 4 A s0 09. / u�0 F �7g_37'34_E___- t \ .� // \ \/--------1---------I-------------------1- ----- _ / ---- 81.54- / co oM) o R \ O I ��// O p U_j o / �1 c ��pp °°\ \ /// / // I I L-:L_lJuf� I I I PARCEL LINE DATA d O� 5\� gyp% Sys / / \ / I I I ( I I LINE NO. LENGTH BEARING k\ °off .. 00 / \ \ / i J L1 37.45 S17° 16' 35"E 0' �� °9, �' L2 7.17 S41° 00'09"E TO N o GA \ / /�5p 3 O Or,\ o / / I I 1 I I L3 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E 0 0. �� `A� ! `°� O O / / \ I I 1 I I I L4 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E OUTLOT A COOAb"r 4 ^�,��,\ s'o°o // / I j \ I L5 7.17 S41' 00' 09"E / 00, \02° �p� j / \� � Op\ o�SF / n \ / / / / / / \ --1 I- �- I L6 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E \O °'/ 5 00 I / j / \ I L7 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E / \ I I I , Q°o \/ /�� 5 p�p0 ?°°\ �� -� o u / _ u 1 _ V L. v I L8 7.17 S41 ° 00' 09"E -t s�,6o to p0 ! s /�. ' / / \ i i i 1vAv r^-� \1' u i i \V/ I_ o tiA \ .0 �� h 6 p� / / ^ 00, ) \ I L9 12.00 S36o 15136"E \J V T L _ \rN J T rr�� O� ° o\ v °h0� / /g� �p s? o\ 09��'�i° `��' \ / \ - I L10 20.32 S49 29 00 E 189) �'�° ° % 6,A 7 O?\ °° °OF /`i� \ / \ I 00, L11 40.65 S27° 10'51"E ° °o\ s / / / 1 \ 60 \ I L12 40.42 N77° 01' 14"E cp py�p\ °o\ F�cF!sr ° �7 O\O po� SQ °9� /�// I 60 L13 20.36 S80° 41' 11 "E /lo 5e 1 Op .00\ O �!/� C-C o \° goo S��/ / / op °`o0 0°,0� (jam \ (1� r I LI J I L14 12.11 N86° 10' 33"E / 0, �j0/ / ��` 0\ �. \ 1 1 LIJ \ '>'� - '�^ I L15 7.17 S88° 50' 52 E L 1 I L16 7.17 S88° 50' 52'E kp lip gip ��/ / o oa\ °OOFZT A°o \/ /��p v pip ?0°\ \ / LI�_ ° 0 / 0 0 y, \ - L17 20.35 S23° 04' 42"E O°O�h� / /�p�,. °\ F° ti x °'p !�` �0 10 op / s '% %� \ ` LI J l 1_ sr -1 / n 9/ \• p °� / /\ FJ ° L el ( L18 18.94 N2° 29' 34"E 3 00 `�� °° loc` l ` '�\ ti9 �'r \ ono I u °* O/ / s\ °o \7 \ / �� \ p� °o !o <� �'6` o0 5 �h'` / /0�00 `000\ °O� �� r / (� t\ I /1 ^) I - - I L19 7.17 N88° 50' 52"W �G c" N§ �p5/ �� e -------- -I------_._.-----( < s O 4 O/ / „�° �! ll-� !, 6, \ / To \ \ I _ L20 12.02 S89° 18' 06"W ?s, '�5'�° \ 5°� / o\ oo, o C_ / F Ao \/ / Qe 11 po ?O\ ` L21 14.29 N80° 56' 25"W 00, r �`'� / oR�° r'00\ 0`9 O�sr ° l \� i i ° \ h I 09 \`�? 04' �F. FS !6 ` O h� Op y �-" \ \ ( t L22 14.41 N74° 35' 15"W 5j ?00 , 2Q stir ,� \?00 �5� 12 j / /� \ 'o \ / \ - ; �' E h J 7° 5T 0 7 / d O, °� p 019 / \ \ _ L23 20.30 N8° 35' 11 "E O 5 Orh�p ?°o ��7 / °oo °tiy!o o\ 5 ��y/ / / /� Oo\ � / \ !O A. \�'c' 0.0/ ��' GA \ / / ( \ \ 1 �t^J L24 20.39 S41' 51' 06'W s 2 l - 0? h°'�^ 6 O°j / ^ �'i° �'�° sv � \0° "/ /°5°'O 13 p 0�\, °° I I / \ L25 13.94 N55° 02' 23"W txb °� / a2\ 00, 00, ?2 0� o \/ / op , ; Ro 0\ / \ g \/ / p0 o O O O 0 i\, 0 O / L26 14.27 N48° 13' 32'W o°b O hq�/ / pk. o\ 9F A°e 09 '� !� \ I ��e \ \00 5 j / /�/c,G 0\ �� o�O s�,�,? lo�,� � \`�?p0 ��ca`' A14 �� / / /\ S ��O / / I \ \ I / L27 12.20 N38° 40' 24"W �' _ 7 p�po 00\ 8 > > 0 0\ 5 I->�� / /p�po s?\°o\ o9F / / �: I \ \ 1 / / I L28 7.17 N41 ° 00' 09"W -v <?° 9p\� D Oo/ /� 4'� 9� \ �00 `'j / /o,O\� \ sQ00 \ I \ I / I L29 7.17 N41 ° 00' 09'W 9�'�Q/° \° g�Op $,��j % 0 0?\ o0o ^15 p'Op ?00\ \ I / I L30 7.17 N41 ° 00' 1 T'W 2 00o a oo�5j�� g� /y °0 c � / 5 `G \ .° h 16 /� DO'S' 1 , i<< L31 7.17 N41 00' 09'W g ko 00\ 21 0 , �, y\ / p0 ?0 \'s, S6 \ \ 1 \ i / / I L32 7.17 N41 ° 00' 01 "W l00 O� O�� pp/� � \`??° ytx j / �Q, �?O �`/9 9� I L33 7.17 N41 ° 00' 17"W \ \•0 5� p� n Ate° \o / /�� °�\ o a?o� I I / _ �ko ^1 O^�/ O?p ' O°O"' r 7 po °o\ gu', 0y I I / I L34 19.84 N31 ° 3T 44"E O l u 'b >h O\ S)� r)l, / 4Q S \\7 00 \O?O p�/ / / �� ESQ � I <O d 7� pp/9 \ 0� �g p a1 °O \?°° 3� 18 j a2\ o2F s PARCEL CURVE DATA Np5 11 A� o°\ �'' /° \ `'� �S% `bs�/ /p° °°\o - 7 T I I -T r r_ T _ •� O �O�/ \ O ` �> _ - / r- �- CURVE NO. ARC LENGTH RADIUS DELTA \L,.p ��/ /h°tv o 1? .0\ / I r I I \ L_ L_ I V V Cl I \?°o h�'p 12 O��/' V 19 a ° 20.53 60.00 019°36'32" 60 / -19 /\ 0 I ` �\ / /gyp 0°\ o9q °° /2�h ' w o H / C -1 \ 4p0 S7g°0 <,<� O°9� \`�? �e`'? / /fie Fo / .1 20 / o R, BRG_ !y , g /O\ sr /O ;�` �* ^ _ - s> 2'00"E \ � t, \ / / o; �'\ Op 0 \`61 32 h 7^ /� ' �4 \ 4=19°3T CH=136.59 `) 6'Q h O ? 2 \ 00 co �V ° ti' 87 ° 44" L_ I \ �p ; 13 pro 0L, 'S'��Q261 � ° \ / ,y`b `� ��, 5 3g26 F s4 -137.26 " S88°50'52"E 322.43 \7 ! O K, ^ O S �''`\S' 4 °S�' , \32 /h 'v� / / %�3� °p S85°17'S3"E ° 228.36 c. / %^ `'S \.0 �h �0/ /� �S° S/, 20° �'� �O / g`� ry o 200 Q 64.00 S88°50'52"E 64.00 S88 50'52"E 64.00 S88°50'52"E 64.00 /' \ ! -,b 14p/ / °�\ �'o '92 a8 sA0 �/ o / ry / 32.00 _ Q 4 Sap - p - � - 00, O i `r popj / Op O\ F6, F S' 21 �`� 41, i /.!� vo o / I- 32.00- 32.00 32.00 T2. ' _ _ _ - p O, \? p0 / ��, sr 0,5, ./ ti v / `� v I o o r o32.00 32.00 32.00 -1 (- 32.00 32.00 O � 00 �88`�7 \`<� \ o N/ 1 2 w/ I o o f t o Cl Clcl, l t Cl 0 0 l t o Cl 0( N O •O\ 3 v my coo co o 0 15 ° ° / ,, / I 3 4 I I I Ico co �I Ico co h v \ � ! p i ss� v\.� s° co z �/ N 3 31 I 5 �� 6� 1 I P 7 I I W � I DETAIL A o/ /� °s o / av IN o r o 0 0 o 0 o 8 o co g �10 01 P NOT TO SCALE \ - \' °3�p 16 / / `�? ssr2, Sj3 864 S6 co / v v ' v l l Clo b)1 1 / b) 1 1 o N �i O\ F 8, 0" 3 I c o o rn o G G) l n �/ �gS° \ �h h� / / ° Gg l �\60 o- L12 _ L `.Oo 3 �/ Z g of 10 0 01 10 S' ''I I' 'v of �,, a �� / /� °\ °o ``2� °o ' - N�5° ''2 ooJ I I z m co I I z $ � Z co o ^ r- / /-\ t\ 1 11 co L. L/ / \ I I \ /� I L _ \ , i/ O� \�'° / /^� p ?0� ?7g 3828" L 32.00 I I I z "L_ U V I V LJ N88°50'52 W 171.05 I, -� ?y/O� o BC W 64 °p _ _ _ - _ _ 32.00 J L 32.00 - 32.00 J L 32.00 - 32.00 /� _ _ - J L 32.00 - 32.00 J 17 �tk `S'S8° 1. 1 L13 N85°1753-W 6400 �L14� N88°50'52 W 64.00 �L15� N88°50'52�W 64.00 L16 N88°50'52�W 64.00 �r �/ .1 -, p /� 76, R, R, K 2 1z6.13 cam/ 44.92 \ O° /�� I / ^ 1 $// / 32�°\ °gF 5826) CH B d'2p° L�r V�'f \ 11 I �� <�t 22 7 L_ t O Ssr R 371 �/� L� �6, u�2 p 00 dR Q� G:S7g° 1�" L- i DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK C1 BLOCK 3 �� \ \D° �� ^`b / hD' a2 4)S 32'14"E-188.11 b ti' n �\\ IR � / /� O� Q. 0' CH=187.10 N88°50'52"W 208.25 0` 50, 100, S88°50'52"E 64.00 =/ _oo ° 6S6? 043" �c4 I �� / �y0 s;Sssr ?00 co C", 8/ 04�4 8656 / 2 a 1 g 1 INCH = 50 FEET _ 32.00 - 32.00 4 \ O S' \ o S M \ems° sal sA°o �/ .1p//�� G �20 / h tell" i 1 ° os,• SCALE IN FEET I OAS \O�sr �S `\?OD g"' 5 ^ah `� O O�� /J'4$2"F 64 �i�, = DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT �., a Z v ,a ry A v 3 � 00 4; ° U '�S �� / P J� l 2 °° S7 21 02 41" I N88°50'52'W 171.05 / 1 • = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT I !\\ ., 32 co 2 /tr O o -- 7°52' L=214. 1 W sr 1 76� \ 'OO / h � � 0 32 ° 52"E 01 n o I o ?) �l/ °4 a� Q4�kiOk /� o o 64.00 Nv o 2 < �/ ^ O v co o /�32 00 S84°25'07"E 64.00BLOCK 3 126.13 I oo 44.92 N rJ = DENOTES 1/21NCH DIAMETER BY 18 co I \ ° e L�� fsg°0 �� Qy /� c a /o 3260 S88 50'52"E 64.00 S88°50'S2"E 64.00� I h^ INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT / t /o o Oa _ _ p _ _ to Q _ p ry m SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352 9 10 I : O h . 1 /a o ' a2.o`o - ---�- �,� A 1�1\1T1/-\r` I �`/ I- 32.00 w C' /° o / 1- 32.00 32.00 (-32.00 32.00 1 I^ I � \ %f�'` O UTLOT B C 2 �/ 1W to o I I , r-\ LJ v I I I � I N o ,V U y /a 2 h/ 0 3 °'/ I o 0 0 o Ig o of N�o° 1 \ \Jv I L_V I L, moo IN "'/ 5 3 I I_ �I IW ► A to 1 /11 ITI /\T '� L32 O �/ /o 04 �/ Iw o I 1� �1 I� co 1 �1 rn1\ OfZ'6 5 BEARING ORIENTATION: 1 O 32 / o t o 16 M g I r I $1$ THE SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT C, COUNTRY CLUB \ � 0 N7 14' ` �o l Z I •� `* I 10 o m I DEAR NORTH 88°50'52"WEST MANOR SECOND ADDITION, IS ASSUMED TO J 7° / a. 0 -7 I I- 0101 0) � \�-DETAIL"A" vv I L_v I v `Z nl ITI /'\T /� �s� S2W L 32.00 IZ a �I I� / �I Ip w o NI \64. 1�1 -----� �'' �I n/�It �°° C2? - 32.00J 32.00 �' co�I IZ �I 1z $ ��1 �I OUTLOT C L,L.v�r \ ., L - O IN 9& 18.21 1 152'52„ 64.00 _ _CJ _ _ 32.00 J L 32.00 - 32.00 J L 32.00 _ 32.00 _I of 32-C1 32 00 W L21 I �I DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL OF OUTLOT C 88 1 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT Nam, ��_� - N88°50' .97 64.00 �� / ON ALL OF LOT 11, BLOCK 3 2507"VV 64.00 L20 N88°50'52W 64.00 L19 N88°50'S2"W 64.00 I 384.97 ' ' 1 1 631.97 / / i i 384.97 N88°50'52"W1035.15 // \ �631.97 - DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ` \ VVV --SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT C, COUNTRY N88° 50'S2"W 1035.15 - - - AND LAND SURVEYING CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION SHEET 2 OF 2 COU\4TRY C.UB \AA\40R FOURT� ADD T 0\4 \ \ KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Lot 1, Block 5, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION and Outlot A, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR THIRD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as COUNTRY CLUB MANOR FOURTH ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness, whereof, said CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20 Signed: CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC Wesley J. Butler, Executive Director —\L) �\U..:./—\.F1. I STATE OF W _ COUNTY OF N CD w S88059'40"E 400.00 \ 0 0186.54 C\jJ S88°59'40"E 63.01 213.46 A / /'\ I I I T L) \ / This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 20 by o S69° \� \J V I v I I \ I Wesley J. Butler, Executive Director, CHC Monticello Townhomes LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. S88°59'40"E 194.57 Z _ _ — s S93 Ir 52,E 6�00 0 N88°23'58"E 32 6g�2S6,F 9F 6600 EASEMENT ON DRAINAGE & TILITY cV 80 (�) Ng6 �p 320 67.75 0 00 64 00 ALL OF OUTLOT A o L1 J signature PARCEL LINE DATA 3 0OUTLOT o L K A A K I/-\[) 3200 N, N�Q o� 0 2 0 \ OU A OT 0 =� print LINE NO. LENGTH BEARING \� \J U 1 v 1 1 \ 1 U L _ V L� I V I /—\ I v \J I \ �� / oo o� o \`rQj° o° 13 to do \ 09S �, wr — Notary Public, County, Minnesota L1 13.68 S76° 58' 12"E ocP 12 o od o S�j\ 0� Rr'� R Q cp r—/�/-\t\ Irl\ A r \r \ITIr\K I /0� 0 11 N M 14 s \\ ss II I L2 10.17 S76° 58' 12"E ca o d �, J L1J — / cA, ,7 0 = o o _ My commission expires — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — L3 13.68 S76° 58' 12"E OCID P, 00 32. N u� O o '0 32' Op 0 � � O io , / � I I I L4 35.74 N66° 20' 01 "W 23 0 0 0 N6 3 '66, o s �i� U L _ U L� co`7 0° S68°/ 00 6�0 822 200 15� o rn� 6 I I, Jonathan D. Schuette do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; tha ta; that this plat is a L5 7.16 N30° 55' 45"W DRAINAGE & UTILITY o MN S20 F (94.0 3 66 10b2� 0'00" L=314 S6 W 64 00 N66 03 a _� thetbo boundary I urvlcensed ey; that al mathematical data nd Surveyor in the and labels are ate of corrrectly designated on thistplat; thatall of L6 18.34 S82° 02' 40"W EASEMENT ON S68°1 1 0 0 S �00° ° 16 15 00 . _ I monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries ALL OF LOT 23, BLOCK 1 °� S20 o p'' q'15"W 2 C' 6� U' oo and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are o F o 0 0 o �N r' L7 25.75 N81° 46' 28"W =`� N 8400 11\l o° ,Co 00 0 03�6 00 1 shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. BLOCK 1 M G�,6 s s65 16 6�00 / 1 t Dated this day of 20 L8 27.06 S50° 23' 42"W 9 N68°1� oL9 6.16 S30° 55'45"E G, 0) .L_/�v11 \ . sg5 0315� �� 8 L10 7.16 S30° 55' 45"E 4 00 M`� N °° 0 0� os �p \ — — — — — Jonathan D. Schuette, Licensed Land Surveyor o s \\ — N LO S $p,. oo �� Q _ _ — — — — — — — Minnesota License No. 45352 L11 33.30 S82° 56' 21"E 60° �5 _ _ _ — `" cfl o \SSg °R N % A A K I r-\ L) L12 12.43 SO' 00' 00"E z �00 Nr'� 6 SF 600 �59 1 7 ° �, �Oo o .- I V I M I v \J I \ °E $ o \ 0 �0 0 STATE OF PARCEL CURVE DATA N68 00 � \ �`�°° '00 0�1� o° CA ° La a \\ ss 559 1 H� gNo J,o COUNTY OF CURVE NO. ARC LENGTH RADIUS DELTA 00 OR °O N o d, tij0 �� 0 559 �� R. ° CO \ `%`% The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me on this day of C1 57.40 130.00 025°17'55" �; 7 gA0° 0 00° 0 0 °�� L� \ ,20 by Jonathan D. Schuette, a Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 45352. C2 30.27 130.00 013°20'33" 1B�a�� SRO° `'o s \ o �� 19 0 C3 30.27 130.00 013°20'33"n�n o °o S6�° 0� 1�`G \` d'`�o° o ��0 .00 ° C4 92.32 130.00 040°41'25" ° _ ° u� 00 s o° o° c�0 9 0 �5 °p `o \ L. L _ �/ f \ I ' \ �5� � � ' signature L7 6�0 0 0 "�, ss ss 55 20 6t T C5 14.19 130.00 006'1619" �� 0 '� \ emu' •o p�5 S �s °��5� °0 �� s \ print o° o 6�0° `o° s �o rn o 559 �� 00 s, Q 3i 00 s �'°° cS ,� O 15 C 00 s o A \ \ o 0 0 0 Notary Public, County, Minnesota \ ° .,� oo `' 6°� ° 4 0° A1�� or, o .o \J g� �i 0 .0 \ My commission expires 0 5� 04 '00 ��q0 \ 7i� o4 �59 O L 11 /� \ 0". �0 �90tk1 00 �0 �� \ 01 o0 22 $�°0 1-10 S ° 3 6� �° ems- �� . �� 'j \ CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION U11<\ �� 'ems, 0�1y 0° (� s '00 55 �,� �, ' \ Be it known that at a meeting held on this day of 20 the Planning <� U'o �5g �R• .0ON s �O o0 6� C^� Commission of the City of Monticello, did hereby review and approve this plat of COUNTRY CLUB MANOR 27 00 0 Op �5 O ^ ��, / FOURTH ADDITION. \ o ° <\ / LI t1 j'i 6) x 1 I VICINITY MAP // \ NOT TO SCALE C.S.A.H. NO. 39 K ��•� IT'S I ^\,K �i STD FAIRWAY DR. ��' / SITE- �� -1 -Y f \ L�L_v\.r \ I G SECTION 10, T. 121, R. 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN f` A/11\ ITI/-r_-I I /1 IVI\JI v 1 /1\1 1 11— \ /lr_-\A/ Tr_-L)L) A r_- \JL_U V IL_ VV '3l 1r � I � L.�_uv\ I I I I I I I � �1 p / Os/ 5 44 ` .00 \ �� Chairperson Secretary 06 •00 ° 0 �OQ 62� 2T" N �' \ \ �'� CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA M CD / / \ \ This plat of COUNTRY CLUB MANOR FOURTH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council 0 It I / / \ �� \ of the City of Monticello at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 and L3 said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. o _ / ` / ` City or Ma Clerk Y Y r\I ITI r\T A <` C "Jul L_� I M � \\ \ \ cD C\ \ ; \ \ WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been DRAINAGE & UTILITY \�/� �' < / �t ^ / \� reviewed and approved this day of 20 EASEMENT ON / ALL OF OUTLOT B 10O \ < Wright County Surveyor OUTLOT , �; 'o " / o B �j//� ��s\ �cP O WRIGHT COUNTY LAND RECORDS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no L' /^ 7 \ \ delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of 20 X` / Wright County Land Records Administrator o / \ \ WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this day of 20 at o'clock .M. and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. /�\ Sleeve as Document No. /4/ t Wright County Recorder ALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN LOT 1 BEARING ORIENTATION: ® = DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT OF BLOCK 5, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION AND 0 100, 200' THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5, COUNTRY = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT OUTLOT A, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR THIRD ADDITION HAVE BEEN CLUB MANOR SECOND ADDITION, IS ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 88°59'40"EAST 1 INCH = 100 FEET O = DENOTES 1/2 INCH DIAMETER BY 18 DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING VACATED PER DOC. NO. SCALE IN FEET INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352 AND LAND SURVEYING City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 2R. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-60 establishing an Absentee Ballot Board for the 2024 Primary and General Elections Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item City Clerk 6/24/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A N/A ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-60 establishing an Absentee Ballot Board for the 2024 Primary and General Elections. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Minnesota State Statue 203B.121 requires the City to establish an Absentee Ballot Board by resolution, if they are conducting absentee voting in the municipality. The main function of the Absentee Ballot Board is to process and accept or reject absentee ballots. This is handled by City Staff (trained as election judges) and appointed election judges and must be completed according to election rules. The absentee ballot voting period runs for 46 days prior to Election Day for both the primary and general elections. Absentee voting for the Primary runs from June 28 to August 12, and for the General election from September 20 to November 4. The City Clerk has been designated to serve as administrator of the absentee voting process under the direction of Wright County Auditor's Office. I. Budget Impact: Personnel costs incorporated into the 2024 budget. II. Staff Workload Impact: The absentee voting process will involve the City Clerk and four City Hall employees. All other assistance will be provided by election judges. Appointment of all election judges will take place at the July 22 City Council meeting. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends adopting the resolution establishing the Absentee Ballot Board. SUPPORTING DATA 0 Resolution 2024-60 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-60 ESTABLISHING AN ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD FOR THE 2024 PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 20313.121 provides authority to a municipality to establish an Absentee Ballot Board in accordance with the provisions of the law; and WHEREAS, an Absentee Ballot Board will allow election judges to perform the task of administering absentee voting as described in Minnesota Election Laws, starting 46 days prior to the Primary and General elections; and WHEREAS, the City will have the necessary equipment, training and other resources in place to administer absentee voting as prescribed by the Minnesota Secretary of State's office; and WHEREAS, the following election judges have completed training for the Absentee Ballot Board and are authorized to administer tasks related to absentee voting; • Jennifer Schreiber • Vicki Leerhoff • Beth Green • Tracy Ergen • Liz Linrud • Kandis Rousselow • John Barthel • Mary Barthel • Pat Thielman • Cindy Rademacher • Roseanne Duran • Teri Willenbring NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL, that an Absentee Ballot Board be established for the purpose of administering the absentee voting process, as provided for by law. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 24t" day of June, 2024. CITY OF MONTICELLO Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 2024-60 duly passed, adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on June 24, 2024, and recorded in minutes of said meeting. Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Notary Public: Date: (STAMP) City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 3A. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-59 authorizing a modification of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District No. 1-42 (CHC f Headwatersl twin homes Proiect) within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Proiect No. 1; and the Amended and Restated Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan relating thereto Prepared by: Meeting Date: ❑ Consent Agenda Item Economic Development Manager 6/24/2024 ® Public Hearing Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City Clerk Finance Director ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-59 authorizing a modification of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 1-42 within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1, and the approval of the amended and restated TIF Plan relating thereto. PREVIOUS ACTIONS February 14, 2022: The TIF Plan was adopted and the TIF District was established to support the development of a 108-unit affordable apartment building serving the age 55+ demographic with an estimated total project cost of approximately $23,600,000. May 23, 2022: The TIF Plan was modified to accurately reflect the land value of the EDA site as determined through an appraisal by Nagell Appraisal, Incorporated. April 22, 2024: Council approval of the replat of the proposed area as Country Club Manor Fourth Addition, and corresponding development contract and amendment to Planned Unit Development May 28, 2024: City Council adopted Resolution 2024-43 calling for a public hearing on the proposed modification TIF District 1-42 and approval of the Amended and Restated TIF Plan for the District REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Proposed is an amended and restated TIF 1-42 Plan and a modification of TIF District 1-42. The specific changes to the TIF Plan stem from the CHC Monticello's recent decision to construct 22 City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 twin homes in the development project versus its former plan to build a 108-unit apartment at the site. Furthermore, the proposed TIF District modification will address the slight increase in the size of the development site which is related to the additional land area needed to accommodate the 22 new twin homes versus the apartment building and parking lot footprint. The increase in the TIF project area for District 1-42 is only a slight shift in land area from District 1-43 to 1-42. The twin home development is intended to serve the age 55 + demographic. A total of nine units will be affordable to households with incomes at or below 60 percent of the area median income (Wright County). The project cost of the new twin home development is estimated at $8,600,000, which equals 22 units at $391,000 per unit. The genesis of the change in the type of housing proposed by the developer is due to its recognition of local market preferences. As CHC completed its build out of the 60-unit twin home development in the adjacent TIF District 1-43, it has found there is a high level of interest from prospective renters in the twin home style of units versus a desire to rent a unit in a large apartment building. Due to the costs associated with development of the twin home site consisting of excavation, grading, sidewalks, utilities, streets, and home construction, CHC Monticello is seeking public financial assistance in the form of pay -go tax increment financing assistance to allow the revised proposal to move forward. Northland Securities reviewed the revised proforma provided by CHC and found that the request for TIF assistance is reasonable. The developer indicated that it will not proceed with the proposal without the approval of the requested public financial assistance. The EDA will consider the amended and restated TIF District Plan and the TIF District modification along with an amended and restated TIF Development Contract at its regular meeting on June 26, 2024. State statutes for TIF review steps including major modifications (increases in area) require a public hearing to be held by the City Council. Budget Impact: There is a minimal budget impact related to the consideration of the amended and restated TIF District Plan and the TIF District modification. Costs incurred in the review process will be covered by CHC Monticello's TIF Application fee deposit payment. II. Staff Impact: Staff involved in the work tasks related to the TIF District 1-42 restated and amended TIF Plan and the proposed modification include the City Administrator, Community Development Director, Economic Development Manager, and Finance Director. Consultant work tasks were also completed by the EDA attorney, Kennedy & City Council Agenda: 6/24/2024 Grave, and staff at Northland Securities. No other staff are needed to complete the work tasks related to this consideration. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Vision adopted as part of the Monticello 2040 Plan is to create a friendly and safe community which is inclusive and fosters a sense of belonging. The city has adopted a strategy for housing which includes developing a range of housing choice and opportunity. As residents move through their career paths and family status, their housing needs change. As an actively developing community, Monticello seeks to provide opportunities for a full range of "life cycle" housing options allowing them to stay and grow with our community. This proposal meets a specific housing need in the community, which is further supported by the 2020 Housing Study. The proposed project also meets the Monticello 2040 goal for growing from within, as it is also located within the city on an underutilized parcel of land. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommend adopting Resolution 2024-59 authorizing the amended and restated TIF Plan and a modification to TIF District 1-42, increasing the size of the District by a by approximately 1,630 square feet. CHC Monticello reevaluated its development plans based on the preferences that it was seeing for various housing types and determined that there is more interest in twin home rental units versus apartment style units and thus sought the proposed change to meet the local market demand. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2024-59 B. Amended and Restated TIF District 1-42 Plan C. Northland Memo re TIF Assistance D. TIF Map showing the changes in the District size E. TIF Application Submittal with Summary of CHC Twin Home Proposal F. TIF Approval Calendar G. Public Hearing Notice CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-59 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-42 WHEREAS, on February 23, 2022, the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") approved a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Original TIF Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 (Headwaters Apartment Project) (the "TIF District") located within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081, and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive and as amended (collectively, the "Act"), and on February 14, 2022, the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") approved the establishment of the TIF District; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2022 and June 8, 2022, respectively, the City and the Authority approved a modification to the Original TIF Plan (the "2022 Modification"), which amended the budget for the TIF District; and WHEREAS, the City and Authority have determined a need to modify the Original TIF Plan in order to (i) enlarge the geographic area of the TIF District, (ii) change the description of the development activities proposed to be constructed within the TIF District, and (iii) revise the budget for the TIF District, all as reflected in that certain document titled "Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No. 1-42 Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1" (the "2024 Modification"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.175, subd. 4(b) of the Act, a tax increment financing plan may not be modified without public hearing or the findings required to be made for the original tax increment financing plan if the modification includes, among other things, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the project or tax increment financing district; and therefore, the 2024 Modification requires the same notice, discussion, public hearing and findings required for the approval of the Original TIF Plan; and WHEREAS, except for approval of the TIF District by the Board of Commissioners of the Authority, the City and its consultants have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption and approval of the 2024 Modification, including, but not limited to, notification of the commissioner of Wright County, Minnesota ("Wright County') representing the area included in the TIF District, notification of Wright County and Independent School District No. 882; and WHEREAS, on the date hereof, the City Council of the City (the "City Council") conducted a public hearing on the 2024 Modification at which the views of all interested parties were heard; and WHEREAS, certain written materials and information (collectively, the "Materials") relating to the 2024 Modification and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the City Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the 2024 Modification. The Materials include data, information, an application, project sources and uses, and other information supplied by Monticello MF West LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, or an entity related thereto or affiliated therewith (the "Developer") as to the activities contemplated therein, and information constituting or relating to (1) why the assistance satisfies the so-called "but for" test and (2) the bases for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The City Council hereby confirms, ratifies, and adopts the Materials, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") as follows: 1. Redevelopment Plan. The City hereby finds that the 2024 Modification is consistent with the redevelopment plan for the Redevelopment Project. 2. Modification to Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42. The City hereby approves the 2024 Modification. 3. Tax Increment Financing Plan. The Original TIF Plan as modified by the 2024 Modification (the "Modified TIF Plan") is adopted as the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District and is incorporated herein by reference, and the City Council makes the following findings consistent with the Modified TIF Plan: (a) The TIF District is a "housing district" within the meaning of Section 469.174, Subdivision 11 of the Act, as described in Section 2.03.3 of the Modified TIF Plan, because (i) it consists of a project, or portions of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income as defined in Chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934; the National Housing Act of 1959; the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended; Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; and any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts, and (ii) no more than 20% of the square footage of buildings that will receive assistance from tax increments within the TIF District will consist of commercial, retail or other nonresidential uses. (b) In the opinion of the City Council, the development proposed in connection with establishment of the TIF District would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, and the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing ("TIF Assistance") would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District as described in the Modified TIF Plan. The above finding is based on a request for tax increment assistance to the City submitted by the Developer, stating that the TIF Assistance is needed from the City and that without the use of tax increment financing, the proposed development could not proceed. The City also finds that in the Materials the Developer has demonstrated that the proposed use of tax increment financing is needed to offset the high construction costs of high -quality low to moderate income housing and associated infrastructure required MN190\170\958597.v1 2 to support the facility. Without the proposed assistance, these initial up -front costs would make it infeasible for the Developer to be able to charge the affordable rates required for low to moderate income residents. Due to the high construction costs of quality housing and the required associated infrastructure, and the limitation on rents available to developers of housing with an affordable component, the City has no expectation that other similar development would occur without TIF Assistance. Therefore, the City reasonably believes that the expected increase in market value at this site without TIF Assistance would be minimal. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been performed. Such analysis is included as Exhibit I to the Modified TIF Plan and is incorporated herein by reference. (c) The Modified TIF Plan for the TIF District conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole. The City has adopted land use controls to guide the use of property. The proposed development plans for the Project in the TIF District have been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council. (d) The Modified TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the TIF District by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the Modified TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for construction of affordable housing by a private developer on currently underdeveloped and underutilized land, thereby increasing housing options in the City and encouraging potential further development of the surrounding properties by other private developers within the Project. (e) The provisions of this Section 2 are hereby incorporated by reference into and made a part of the Modified TIF Plan. Background information and facts supporting all the above findings are set forth in the Modified TIF Plan which is hereby incorporated by reference into and made a part of this resolution. The City reaffirms the findings it made connection with the adoption of the original TIF Plan and the findings made therein are hereby incorporated by reference into and made a part of this resolution as supplemented herein 4. Public Purpose. The adoption of the Modified TIF Plan conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an underutilized area of the City, eliminate blighting factors, to provide increased housing options to City residents, to provide affordable housing for seniors in the City, to improve the tax base, and to improve the general economy of the State, and thereby serves a public purpose. 5. Subject to approval of the 2024 Modification by the Authority, Authority staff is authorized to forward a copy of the Modified TIF Plan to the Department of Revenue and the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, subd.4(a). 6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to forward a copy of the Modified TIF Plan to Wright County. MN190\170\958597.v1 3 DATED: June 24, 2024 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk MN190\170\958597.v1 DRAFT CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA MODIFIED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 CENTRAL MONTICELLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 PROPOSED TO BE ADOPTED BY CITY OF MONTICELLO AND CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) PUBLIC HEARING FOR ADOPTION OF MODIFICATION: JUNE 24, 2024 MODIFIED TIF PLAN ADOPTED BY EDA: JUNE 26, 2024 MODIFIED TIF PLAN ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL: JUNE 2412024 TIF DISTRICT CERTIFICATION DATE: JULY 7, 2023 Onorthland Public Finance Northland Securities, Inc. 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 3300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (800) 851-2920 Member NASD and SIPC Registered with SEC and MSRB TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I - INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS.........................................................I Section 1.01 Introduction......................................................................................1 Section 1.02 Definitions.........................................................................................1 Section 1.03 Plan Preparation...............................................................................2 ARTICLE II -TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN.........................................................3 Section 2.01 Statutory Authority..........................................................................3 Section 2.02 Planned Development.....................................................................3 2.02.1 Project Description......................................................................................3 2.02.2 City Plans and Development Program .................................................... 3 2.02.3 Land Acquisition.........................................................................................3 2.02.4 Development Activities..............................................................................3 2.02.5 Need for Tax Increment Financing........................................................... 3 Section 2.03 Tax Increment Financing District...................................................4 2.03.1 Designation.................................................................................................. 4 2.03.2 Boundaries of TIF District..........................................................................4 2.03.3 Type of District............................................................................................4 Section 2.04 Plan for Use of Tax Increment........................................................4 2.04.1 Estimated Tax Increment............................................................................4 2.04.2 Public Development Costs.........................................................................5 2.04.3 Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds ..................................................... 6 Figure2-1...................................................................................................... 6 2.04.4 Administrative Expense.............................................................................6 2.04.5 County Road Costs..................................................................................... 7 2.04.6 Bonded Indebtedness................................................................................. 7 2.04.7 Election of First Year of Increment and Duration of TIF District ......... 7 2.04.8 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions ................................... 7 2.04.9 Prior Planned Improvements.................................................................... 8 ARTICLE III - ADMINISTERING THE TIF DISTRICT ..................................................... 9 Section 3.01 Filing and Certification....................................................................9 Section 3.02 Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan....................9 Section 3.03 4-Year Knockdown Rule..................................................................9 Section 3.04 Pooling/5-Year Rule........................................................................10 Section 3.05 Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements ...................10 Section 3.06 Business Subsidy Compliance......................................................10 EXHIBITS...........................................................................................................................�� Exhibit I - Present Value Analysis..........................................................................11 Exhibit II - Projected Tax Increment......................................................................12 Exhibit III - Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions..............................................13 Exhibit IV - Estimated Tax Increment Over Duration of TIF District...............14 Exhibit V - Map of TIF District...............................................................................15 Exhibit VI - Map of Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 ............16 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 ARTICLE I — INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS SECTION 1.01 INTRODUCTION The City of Monticello (the "City') approved the establishment of Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No. 1-42 (the "TIF District") on February 14, 2022, with the first modification approved on May 23, 2022. The City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Authority') approved the establishment of the TIF District on February 23, 2022, with the first modification approved on June 8, 2022. The first modification was approved by the City and the Authority prior to the Authority submitting the request for certification of the TIF District to the Wright County Auditor. The request for certification is dated June 8, 2023. The Wright County Auditor certified the TIF District on July 7, 2023. The City and the Authority propose to further modify the TIF District and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the TIF District (the "TIF Plan"). The modification provides for a minor adjustment (enlargement) of the boundaries of the TIF District and modification to the TIF Plan. The modification to the TIF Plan includes a change in the description of the Project (as hereinafter defined) and the estimated tax increment revenues and project costs to be paid from tax increment revenues, among other changes. The TIF Plan, as originally adopted, included plans for the construction by a private developer (the "Developer") of an approximately 102-unit rental multi -family housing facility for seniors, with approximately 75 on -grade and 100 covered parking stalls. The Developer is proposing a new project. The Developer proposes to install 22 rental townhome units within the TIF District (the "Project"). The modular home units will be built off site and transported to the site for installation on constructed building pads. The Developer plans for 9 of the 22 units (a minimum of 40%) to be leased to persons or families that income qualify at 60% of the area median income. The Project will be located on the platted parcels at the southwest corner of Golf Course Road and 7th Street West within the City. Subject to approval of the request for public financial assistance, the Developer plans to substantially complete the Project by December 31, 2024. This document, the TIF Plan is intended to supersede and alter the activities described in the original TIF Plan as adopted by the City and the Authority. The TIF Plan contains the plan for achieving the objectives of the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 through the TIF District. SECTION 1.02 DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this document, the terms below have the meanings given in this section, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: 1. "Authority' means the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority. 2. "City" means the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 3. "City Council" means the City Council of the City. 4. "County" means Wright County, Minnesota. 5. "Developer" means the private party undertaking construction of the Project within the TIF District. 6. "Public Development Costs" means the cost of the development activities that will or are DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 expected to occur within the Redevelopment Project or the TIF District. 7. "Project" means the construction by the Developer of 22 rental townhome units within the TIF District. The modular home units will be built off site and transported to the site for installation on constructed building pads, to be located at the southwest corner of Golf Course Road and 7th Street West within the City. 8. "Redevelopment Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project, as the same may, from time to time, be amended or supplemented. 9. "Redevelopment Project" means Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Authority, as the same may, from time to time, be amended or supplemented. 10. "School District" means Independent School District No. 882 (Monticello Public Schools). 11. "State" means the State of Minnesota. 12. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended, both inclusive. 13. "TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No. 1-42. 14. "TIF Plan' means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document). SECTION 1.03 PLAN PREPARATION This document was prepared for the City and the Authority by Northland Securities, Inc. DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 ARTICLE II - TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN SECTION 2.01 STATUTORY AUTHORITY The TIF District and the TIF Plan are established under the authority of the TIF Act. SECTION 2.02 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 2.02. 7 Project Description The Project includes the Developer installing 22 rental townhome units within the TIF District. The modular home units will be built off site and transported to the site for installation on constructed building pads. The Developer plans for 9 of the 22 units (a minimum of 40%) to be leased to persons or families that income qualify at 60% of the area median income. The property where the Project will be built is currently vacant and owned by the Developer. 2.02.2 City Plans and Development Program In addition to achieving the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, the Project is consistent with and works to achieve the development objectives of the City. The TIF Plan for the TIF District conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole. The City has adopted land use controls to guide the use of property. The proposed development plans for the Project in the TIF District have been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council. 2.02.3 Land Acquisition The Developer owns the land within the TIF District. The Developer purchased the land from the Authority for the Project. 2.02.4 Development Activities On June 26, 2024, the Authority will consider approving an Amended and Restated TIF Assistance Agreement with the Developer (the "Development Agreement"), pursuant to which the Authority would provide tax increment financing assistance to the Developer for certain Public Development Costs associated with the Project. 2.02.5 Need for Tax Increment Financing In various materials the Developer has demonstrated that the proposed use of tax increment financing is needed to offset the high construction costs of high -quality low- to moderate - income housing and associated infrastructure required to support the Project. Without the proposed assistance, these initial up -front costs would make it infeasible for the Developer to be able to charge the affordable rents required for low -to moderate -income residents. Thus, it is the opinion of the City and the Authority that the Project would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the Project after subtracting the present value of the estimated tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above and is shown in Exhibit I. This analysis, which is not required by the TIF Act for approval of a housing district, indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the Project (less the present value of the estimated tax increments for the maximum duration permitted by the TIF Plan) exceeds the estimated market value of the site prior to the establishment of the TIF District. DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 SECTION 2.03 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 2.03.7 Designation This TIF District is designated Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No. 1-42. 2.03.2 Boundaries of TIF District The boundaries of the TIF District are depicted in Exhibit V. The TIF District includes the following platted parcels along with the adjacent roads and right-of-way to the parcels: • Lots 1-23, Block 1, Country Club Manor Fourth Addition • Outlot A, Country Club Manor Fourth Addition 2.03.3 Type of District The TIF District is designated as a "housing" district pursuant to Section 469.174, subdivision 11 of the TIF Act. For the designation of a tax increment financing housing district the Developer of the Project will need to commit to the following: 1. Satisfy the income requirements for a qualified residential rental project as defined in section 142(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. This requirement applies for the duration of the TIF District. The Developer will commit to provide (a) 40% or more of units for occupancy by persons or families at 60% or less of AMI (based on household size). The income thresholds may change over the duration of the TIF District. 2. Provide that no more than 20% of the square footage of buildings to receive assistance from tax increments consist of commercial, retail, or other nonresidential uses. Revenue derived from tax increment from a housing district must be used solely to finance the cost of housing projects as defined in Section 469.174, subdivision 11 of the TIF Act. The cost of public improvements directly related to the housing projects and the allocated administrative expenses of the Authority may be included in the cost of a housing project. 3. Failure to comply with these income limitations is subject to the enforcement provisions of Section 469.1771 of the TIF Act. SECTION 2.04 PLAN FOR USE OF TAX INCREMENT 2.04.1 Estimated Tax Increment The original net tax capacity of value of the TIF District was certified on July 7, 2023 by the County Auditor in the amount of $0. The parcel within the TIF District at time of certification (PID 155276005010) was valued at $158,300, with an exempt property classification. The County Auditor adjusts the original net tax capacity value of the parcels within the TIF District as property is platted and classification of property changes. The original market value of $158,300 will remain the original value, with this original value prorated to new parcels established. The total tax capacity value of the property for the first estimated year of tax increment (for taxes payable in 2026) is estimated to be $107,500. This amount is based on a total estimated market value of $8,600,000 with property classified as residential rental property. The estimated difference between the total tax capacity value after development completion (for taxes payable in 2026) and the original net tax capacity value is the captured tax capacity value of $105,521 for the creation of tax increment in the first year. The certified original tax rate that applies to the TIF District is 86.877413%. The County Auditor certified this original tax rate on July 7, 2023, this rate being the local tax rate for taxes payable in 2023. The original local tax rate is the sum of all the local tax rates, excluding that portion of the school rate attributable to the general education levy under Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.13, which applies to property in the TIF District. The local tax rate to be certified is the rate DRAFT J U N E 3, 2024 4 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 in effect for the same taxes payable year applicable to the tax capacity values certified as the TIF District's original tax capacity. The resulting tax capacity rate is the original local tax rate for the duration of the TIF District. Under these assumptions, the estimated annual tax increment will be $91,344 in the first year of tax increment collection. The actual tax increment will vary according to changes in the certified original tax rate compared to the actual annual tax rates certified, the actual property value produced by the proposed development and the changes in property value and State tax policy over the duration of the TIF District. It is the intent of the City and the Authority to retain 100% of the captured tax capacity value for the duration of the TIF District. Exhibit II contains the estimated tax increment over the duration of the TIF District. 2.04.2 Public Development Costs The Authority will use tax increment to pay Public Development Costs. The Authority anticipates the use of tax increment to pay administrative expenses for the TIF District and to reimburse the Authority and the Developer on a pay -go basis for Public Development Costs. A contract between the Authority and the Developer will define the means for verifying Public Development Costs to be incurred by the Developer that will be eligible for reimbursement from tax increments and the means of disbursing tax increments collected by the Authority to the Developer. The Authority may also use tax increments to pay financing costs. The interest rate payable on bonds, the definition of which includes tax increment financing revenue notes, to be issued will be set pursuant to the Development Agreement. The City and the Authority may modify the TIF Plan to provide authority to expend tax increment from the TIF District on other qualified housing projects that meet the criteria for establishing a housing TIF district. Section 469.174, subdivision 11 of the TIF Act defines a housing district as consisting of a project, or a portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income. The requirements for the establishment of a housing TIF district are contained in Section 469.1761 of the TIF Act. The primary criteria are income related. The criteria are different for owned and rental housing. The practical application of this authority includes: • The use of tax increment is not limited by pooling restrictions or the five-year rule. • The tax increment can be spent on activities outside of the TIF District, but within the Development District No. 1. • This authority does not extend the maximum statutory duration of the TIF District. • The tax increment must be used solely to finance the cost of the "housing project" as defined by the TIF Act. The cost of public improvements directly related to the housing project and the allocated administrative expenses of the Authority may be included in the cost of the housing project. • No more than 20% of the square footage of buildings that receive TIF assistance may consist of commercial, retail, or other nonresidential uses. Potential applications of this authority include: • Individual housing projects built without creating a new TIF district. • Supplementing the revenues of another housing TIF district. • Assistance for the renovation of existing housing. • Acquisition of land for housing. DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 • Assistance to make public improvements directly related to housing projects more affordable. 2.04.3 Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds The estimated sources of revenue, along with the estimated Public Development Costs of the TIF District, are itemized in Figure 2-1 that follows. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax increments from the TIF District. The City and Authority reserve the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the Estimated Tax Increment Project Cost line items listed in Figure 2-1, so long as the total Estimated Tax Increment Project Costs amount, not including financing costs, is not increased. FIGURE 2-1 ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Total Estimated Tax Increment Revenues (from tax increment generated by the district) Tax increment revenues distributed from the County 2,703,000 Interest and investment earnings 50,000 Sales/lease proceeds - Market value homestead credit - Total Estimated Tax Increment Revenues 2,753,000 Estimated Project/Financing Costs (to be paid or financed with tax increment) Project costs Land/building acquisition 180,697 Site improvements/preparation costs - Utilities - Other public improvements - Construction of affordable housing 1,738,303 Small city authorized costs, if not already included above - Administrative costs 100,000 Estimated Tax Increment Project Costs 2,019,000 Estimated financing costs Interest expense 734,000 Total Estimated Project/Financing Costs to be Paid from Tax Increment 2,753,000 Estimated Financing Total amount of bonds to be issued 2,753,000 2.04.4 Administrative Expense The Authority reserves the right to spend up to ten percent (10%) of tax increment revenues distributed from the County on qualified administrative expenses pursuant to the TIF Act. The Authority will use these monies to pay for and reimburse the Authority for costs of administering the TIF District allowed by the TIF Act. The estimated amount of tax increment revenue planned to pay administrative expense is shown in Figure 2-1, and is currently estimated to be less than 10% of the tax increment revenues estimated to be distributed from the County. Anticipated administrative expenses of the TIF District include an annual audit of DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 the fund for TIF District, preparation of annual reporting, legal publication of the annual report, and administration of the Development Agreement, among other qualified purposes. 2.04.5 County Road Costs The Project will not substantially increase the use of county roads and will not necessitate the need to use tax increments to pay for county road improvements. 2.04.6 Bonded Indebtedness The total amount of bonds estimated to be issued is shown in Figure 2-1. The City does not plan to issue general obligation bonded indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. The Authority intends to use tax increment financing to reimburse the Developer on a pay-as- you-go basis for Public Development Costs pursuant to the Development Agreement. The City or the Authority may advance or loan money to finance expenditures under Section 469.176, subdivision 4 of the TIF Act, from the general funds of the City or the Authority or any other fund under which there is legal authority to do so, subject to the following provisions: (a) Not later than 60 days after money is transferred, advanced, or spent, whichever is earliest, the loan or advance must be authorized by resolution of the City or of the Authority, whichever has jurisdiction over the fund from which the advance or loan is authorized. (b) The resolution may generally grant to the City or the Authority the power to make interfund loans under one or more tax increment financing plans or for one or more districts. The resolution may be adopted before or after the adoption of the tax increment financing plan or the creation of the tax increment financing district from which the advance or loan is to be repaid. (c) The terms and conditions for repayment of the loan must be provided in writing. The written terms and conditions may be in any form, but must include, at a minimum, the principal amount, the interest rate, and maximum term. Written terms may be modified or amended in writing by the City or the Authority before the latest decertification of any tax increment financing district from which the interfund loan is to be repaid. The maximum rate of interest permitted to be charged is limited to the greater of the rates specified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 270C.40 or 549.09 as of the date the loan or advance is authorized, unless the written agreement states that the maximum interest rate will fluctuate as the interest rates specified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 270C.40 or 549.09 are from time to time adjusted. Loans or advances may be structured as draw - down or line -of -credit obligations of the lending fund. (d) The Authority shall report in the annual report submitted under Section 469.175, subdivision 6 of the TIF Act: (1) the amount of any interfund loan or advance made in a calendar year; and (2) any amendment of an interfund loan or advance made in a calendar year. 2.04.7 Election of First Year of Increment and Duration of TIF District The duration to collect and spend tax increments on eligible purposes is set at the maximum duration of 25 years after the date of receipt of the first tax increment or 26 years of tax increment collection. The first year of increment was elected to be year 2025 with the adoption of the original TIF Plan. Based on the estimated commencement of the Project, the first year of tax increment is estimated to be year 2026 and the estimated decertification date is 12/31/2051. 2.04.8 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Exhibits III and IV show the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum estimated retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 the other taxing jurisdictions. The City and the Authority believe that there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the duration of the TIF District since the proposed development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the development therein becomes part of the general tax base. The City and the Authority anticipate minimal impact of the proposed development on city -provided services. A manageable increase in water and sewer usage is expected. It is anticipated that there may be a slight but manageable increase in police and fire protection duties due to the development. 2.04.9 Prior Planned Improvements There were no building permits issued in the 18 months preceding the original establishment of the TIF District in conjunction with any of the properties within the TIF District. The Authority included this statement with the request for certification to the County Auditor. In addition, there have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the TIF District. DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 ARTICLE III — ADMINISTERING THE TIF DISTRICT SECTION 3.01 FILING AND CERTIFICATION The original filing and certification of the TIF Plan consisted of the following steps: 1. Upon adoption of the TIF Plan by the City and the Authority, the Authority submitted a copy of the TIF Plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor. 2. The Authority submitted a request to the County Auditor on June 8, 2023 to certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the Authority submitted copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The filing of the modified TIF Plan consists of the following steps: 3. Upon adoption of the modified TIF Plan by the City and the Authority, the Authority will submit a copy of the modified TIF Plan, along with any other required forms, to the County Auditor, Minnesota Department of Revenue, and the Office of the State Auditor. SECTION 3.02 MODIFICATIONS OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN The City and the Authority reserve the right to modify the TIF District and the TIF Plan. Under the TIF Act, the following actions can only be approved after satisfying all the necessary requirements for approval of the original TIF Plan (including notifications and public hearing): 1. any reduction or enlargement of geographic area of the Development Project or TIF District that does not meet the requirements of Section 469.175, subdivision 4, paragraph (e) of the TIF Act. 2. increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred; 3. a determination to capitalize interest on the debt if that determination was not a part of the original plan; 4. increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the Authority; 5. increase in the estimate of the cost of the Project, including administrative expenses, that will be paid or financed with tax increment from the TIF District; or 6. designation of additional property to be acquired by the Authority. Other modifications can be made by resolution of the Authority. In addition, the original approval process does not apply if (1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District and (2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the City and the Authority agree that the TIF District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated. Upon approval by the City, the Authority must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date of certification. SECTION 3.03 4-YEAR KNOCKDOWN RULE The 4-Year Knockdown Rule requires that if after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation or site improvement, including a qualified DRAFT J U N E 3, 2024 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 improvement of an adjacent street, has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The Authority must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District. If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the City, Authority, or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the above activities, the Authority shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. SECTION 3.04 POOLING/5-YEAR RULE As permitted under Section 469.1763, subdivision 2(b) and subdivision 3(a)(5) of the TIF Act, any expenditures of increment from the TIF District to pay the cost of a "housing project" as defined in Section 469.174, subdivision 11 of the TIF Act, will be treated as an expenditure within the district for the purposes of the "pooling rules" and the "five year rule". It is not anticipated that tax increments will be spent outside the TIF District (except allowable administrative expenses), but such expenditures are expressly authorized in the TIF Plan. SECTION 3.05 FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS The Authority will comply with the annual reporting requirements of the TIF Act pursuant to the guidelines of the Office of the State Auditor. Under current law, the Authority must prepare and submit a report on the TIF district on or before August 1 of each year. The Authority must also annually publish in a newspaper of general circulation in the City an annual statement for each tax increment financing district. The reporting and disclosure requirements outlined in this section begin with the year the district was certified, and shall end in the year in which both the district has been decertified and all tax increments have been spent or returned to the county for redistribution. Failure to meet these requirements, as determined by the State Auditor's Office, may result in suspension of distribution of tax increment. SECTION 3.06 BUSINESS SUBSIDY COMPLIANCE The Project is exempt from the business subsidy requirements specified in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995, as amended, because the intended assistance for the Project specified in this document is anticipated to be 100% for housing assistance. DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 10 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 Exhibit I City of Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 Present Value Analysis 3 Section 469.175(3)(2) of the TIF Act Headwaters Townhouse Project 1 Estimated Future Market Value w/ Tax Increment Financing $11,139,204 ' 2 Payable 2023 Market Value $158,300 3 Market Value Increase (1-2) $10,980,904 4 Present Value of Future Tax Increments $1,800,339 5 Market Value Increase Less PV of Tax Increments $9,180,565 6 Estimated Future Market Value w/o Tax Increment Financing $203,009 ' 7 Payable 2023 Market Value $158,300 8 Market Value Increase (6-7) $44,709 9 Increase in MV From TIF $9,135,856 Z ' Assume 1.00% annual appreciation of value. z Statutory compliance achieved if increase in market value from TIF (Line 9) is greater than or equal to zero. 3 Section 469.175(3)(2) of the TIF Act does not require this present value analysis for a housing tax increment financing district. This analysis is provided for information purposes. DRAFT J U N E 3, 2024 11 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 Exhibit II City of Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 (Housing) Headwaters Townhouse Project Projected Tax Increment Cash Flow Taxable Less Present TIF Taxes Captured Market Net Tax Original Original Available Value of District Payable Net Tax Value Capacity Net Tax Tax Rate TIF Available Year Year Capacity (TMV) Capacity TIF 1 2026 8,600,000 107,500 1,979 105,521 86.877% 91,344 87,573 2 2027 8,686,000 108,575 1,979 106,596 86.877% 92,275 173,443 3 2028 8,772,860 109,661 1,979 107,682 86.877% 93,214 257,643 4 2029 8,860,589 110,757 1,979 108,779 86.877% 94,164 340,205 5 2030 8,949,194 111,865 1,979 109,886 86.877% 95,122 421,160 6 2031 9,038,686 112,984 1,979 111,005 86.877% 96,091 500,540 7 2032 9,129,073 114,113 1,979 112,135 86.877% 97,069 578,376 8 2033 9,220,364 115,255 1,979 113,276 86.877% 98,057 654,697 9 2034 9,312,568 116,407 1,979 114,428 86.877% 99,054 729,533 10 2035 9,405,693 117,571 1,979 115,592 86.877% 100,062 802,912 11 2036 9,499,750 118,747 1,979 116,768 86.877% 101,080 874,863 12 2037 9,594,748 119,934 1,979 117,956 86.877% 102,108 945,413 13 2038 9,690,695 121,134 1,979 119,155 86.877% 103,146 1,014,590 14 2039 9,787,602 122,345 1,979 120,366 86.877% 104,195 1,082,420 15 2040 9,885,478 123,568 1,979 121,590 86.877% 105,254 1,148,929 16 2041 9,984,333 124,804 1,979 122,825 86.877% 106,324 1,214,143 17 2042 10,084,176 126,052 1,979 124,073 86.877% 107,404 1,278,086 18 2043 10,185,018 127,313 1,979 125,334 86.877% 108,495 1,340,785 19 2044 10,286,868 128,586 1,979 126,607 86.877% 109,597 1,402,262 20 2045 10,389,737 129,872 1,979 127,893 86.877% 110,710 1,462,541 21 2046 10,493,634 131,170 1,979 129,192 86.877% 111,834 1,521,646 22 2047 10,598,571 132,482 1,979 130,503 86.877% 112,970 1,579,600 23 2048 10,704,556 133,807 1,979 131,828 86.877% 114,117 1,636,424 24 2049 10,811,602 135,145 1,979 133,166 86.877% 115,275 1,692,141 25 2050 10,919,718 136,496 1,979 134,518 86.877% 116,445 1,746,773 26 2051 11,028,915 137,861 1,979 135,883 86.877% 117,626 1,800,339 TOTAL = 2,703,031 1,800,339 Key Assumptions for Cash Flow: 1 Taxable market value (TMV) annual growth assumption = 1.00% 2 Original Tax Rate is based on Certified Original Tax Rate. 3 Election for captured tax capacity is 100.0% 4 Original Net Tax Capacity is calculated based on certified original TMV = $158,300, NTC calculated for rental property classification. 5 Present value (PV) of TIF to EDA is calculated based on semi-annual payments, 3.0% rate, and date of 12/5/2022. 6 Present value (PV) of Net Available TIF is calculated based on semi-annual payments, 4.5% rate, and date of 6/1/2025. 7 Available TIF is after deducting State Auditor Fee of 0.36%. DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 12 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 Exhibit III City of Monticello Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions (Taxes Payable 2023) Headwaters Townhouse Project Annual Tax Increment Estimated Annual Captured Tax Capacity (Full Development) Payable 2023 Local Tax Rate Estimated Annual Tax Increment City of Monticello Wright County ISD # 882 Percent of Tax Base $121,590 86.877% $105,634 Net Tax Captured Percent of Capacity (NTC) Tax Capacity Total NTC 31,796,124 121,590 0.38% 191,418,817 121,590 0.06% 42,943,725 121,590 0.28% Dollar Impact of Affected Taxing Jurisdictions Net Tax Tax Added Local Capacity % of Total Increment Tax Rate (NTC) Share City of Monticello 34.991% 40.276% 42,546 0.134% Wright County 37.848% 43.565% 46,020 0.024% ISD # 882 12.871% 14.815% 15,649 0.036% Other 1.167% 1.344% 1,419 Totals 86.877% 100.000% 105,634 NOTE NO. 1: Assuming that ALL of the captured tax capacity would be available to all taxing jurisdictions even if the City does not create the Tax Increment District, the creation of the District will reduce tax capacities and increase the local tax rate as illustrated in the above tables. NOTE NO. 2: Assuming that NONE of the captured tax capacity would be available to the taxing jurisdiction if the City did not create the Tax Increment District, then the plan has virtually no initial effect on the tax capacities of the taxing jurisdictions. However, once the District is established, allowable costs paid from the increments, and the District is terminated, all taxing jurisdictions will experience an increase in their tax base. DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 13 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 Exhibit IV City of Monticello Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No. 1-42 Headwaters Townhouse Project Estimated Tax Increments Over Maximum Duration of TIF District Based on Pay2023 Tax Rate = 86.8779,6 34.997% 37.848% 12.877% 1.1679vo New Estimated City County School Other TIF Taxes Taxable New Base Captured Total TIF TIF TIF TIF District Payable Market Tax Tax Tax Tax Related Related Related Related Year Year Value Capacity Capacity Capacity Increment Share Share Share Share 1 2026 8,600,000 107,500 1,979 105,521 91,674 36,923 39,938 13,581 1,232 2 2027 8,686,000 108,575 1,979 106,596 92,608 37,299 40,345 13,720 1,244 3 2028 8,772,860 109,661 1,979 107,682 93,551 37,679 40,756 13,859 1,257 4 2029 8,860,589 110,757 1,979 108,779 94,504 38,063 41,171 14,001 1,269 5 2030 8,949,194 111,865 1,979 109,886 95,466 38,450 41,590 14,143 1,283 6 2031 9,038,686 112,984 1,979 111,005 96,438 38,842 42,014 14,287 1,295 7 2032 9,129,073 114,113 1,979 112,135 97,420 39,237 42,441 14,433 1,309 8 2033 9,220,364 115,255 1,979 113,276 98,411 39,636 42,873 14,579 1,323 9 2034 9,312,568 116,407 1,979 114,428 99,412 40,040 43,309 14,728 1,335 10 2035 9,405,693 117,571 1,979 115,592 100,424 40,447 43,750 14,878 1,349 11 2036 9,499,750 118,747 1,979 116,768 101,445 40,858 44,195 15,029 1,363 12 2037 9,594,748 119,934 1,979 117,956 102,477 41,274 44,644 15,182 1,377 13 2038 9,690,695 121,134 1,979 119,155 103,519 41,694 45,098 15,336 1,391 14 2039 9,787,602 122,345 1,979 120,366 104,571 42,117 45,557 15,492 1,405 15 2040 9,885,478 123,568 1,979 121,590 105,634 42,546 46,020 15,649 1,419 16 2041 9,984,333 124,804 1,979 122,825 106,708 42,978 46,487 15,809 1,434 17 2042 10,084,176 126,052 1,979 124,073 107,792 43,415 46,960 15,969 1,448 18 2043 10,185,018 127,313 1,979 125,334 108,887 43,856 47,437 16,131 1,463 19 2044 10,286,868 128,586 1,979 126,607 109,993 44,301 47,919 16,295 1,478 20 2045 10,389,737 129,872 1,979 127,893 111,110 44,751 48,405 16,461 1,493 21 2046 10,493,634 131,170 1,979 129,192 112,238 45,206 48,897 16,628 1,507 22 2047 10,598,571 132,482 1,979 130,503 113,378 45,665 49,393 16,797 1,523 23 2048 10,704,556 133,807 1,979 131,828 114,529 46,128 49,895 16,967 1,539 24 2049 10,811,602 135,145 1,979 133,166 115,691 46,596 50,401 17,139 1,555 25 2050 10,919,718 136,496 1,979 134,518 116,866 47,069 50,913 17,313 1,571 26 2051 11,028,915 137,861 1,979 135,883 118,051 47,547 51,429 17,489 1,586 Total 2,712,797 1,092,617 1,181,837 401,895 36,448 Note: The Estimated Total Tax Increment shown above is before deducting the State Auditor's fee, which is payable at a rate of 0.36% of the Total Tax Increment collected. Exhibit II provides Estimated Total Tax Increment after deducting for the State Auditor's fee. DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 14 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 EXHIBIT V Boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 within Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 TIF District is inclusive of parcels within the TIF District and the adjacent roads and right of way d c 3 0 m M a c N U vanes y o. a — H I c—"y cl— ae ll � m V O � N m N Z� a >C> E 1:41\ DRAFT J U N E 3, 2024 15 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 EXHIBIT VI Boundaries of Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 16 1n northland Public Finance MEMORANDUM To: City of Monticello From: Tammy Omdal Date: June 3, 2024 Re: Evaluation of Public Financial Assistance for TIF 1-42 (CHC — Villa Twin -homes) The City of Monticello (the "City') and the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") received an application from Headwaters Development LLC (the "Redeveloper") for public financial assistance to assist with a modified proposed project to be constructed within the boundaries of the certified Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No.1-42 (the "TIF District"). The Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the TIF District was adopted and the TIF District established by the City on February 14, 2022. The Wright County Auditor certified the TIF District on July 7, 2023. The adopted TIF Plan is based on plans for the construction by the Redeveloper of an approximate 102-unit rental multi -family housing facility for seniors, with approximately 75 on -grade and 100 covered parking stalls. The Redeveloper is proposing a new project. The Redeveloper proposes to install 22 rental twin -home units within the TIF District (the "Project"). The modular home units will be built offsite and transported to the site for installation on constructed building pads. The Redeveloper plans for 9 of the 22 units (a minimum of 40%) to be leased to persons that income qualify at 60% of the area median income. The Project will be located on the platted parcels at the corner of Golf Course Road and 7th Street West within the City (the "Property"). Subject to approval of the request for public financial assistance, the Redeveloper plans to substantially complete the Project by December 31, 2024. The estimated cost for the Project is approximately $8.6 million (see Exhibit A). This compares to what was originally estimated to be a $23.4 million cost for the multi -family housing project. The Redevelopers request for public financial assistance is to assist with the extraordinary costs of redevelopment and construction of the affordable housing for the Project. The Redeveloper has represented that it will not undertake the Project as proposed without the approval of the requested public financial assistance. It is Northland's opinion that the Project is unlikely to occur but for the proposed public financial assistance, inclusive of the tax increment financing (TIF). Without public financial assistance, the Project is not expected to achieve the level of returns needed to secure the necessary equity. 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 3300, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Main: (612) 851-5900 / Direct: (612) 851-4964 / Email: tomdal@northlandsecurities.com Member FINRA and SIFC I Registered with SEC and MSRB Monticello TIF 142 June 3, 2024 Page 2 Northland finds that it is reasonable for the EDA to consider (modified) public financial assistance for the Project, an affordable housing project, as necessary so that development by private enterprise will occur on the Property. The Project is not likely to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. Public Financial Assistance The Redeveloper (legal entity Monticello MF West LLC) entered into the Purchase and Redevelopment Contract with the EDA, dated November 30, 2022 (the "Agreement"). The Agreement provides that the Redeveloper was to construct on the Property an approximately 102- unit multifamily rental housing facility for seniors, with approximately 75 on -grade and 100 covered parking stalls. The Redeveloper is seeking a modification to the Agreement. The modification includes a change in what is now proposed for the Project (minimum improvements) and to the public financial assistance from the EDA in the form of a pay -go tax increment financing assistance. Pursuant to the Agreement, the EDA acted to convey property within the TIF District to the Redeveloper. The Redeveloper paid at the closing on the land the outstanding deferred special assessments on the Property. Based on Northland's analysis of the financial information provided by the Redeveloper for the proposed modification, the following modified terms for assistance to the Redeveloper are proposed: • Maximum term of 20 years for TIF assistance to the Redeveloper. The first payment to the Redeveloper will be August 1, 2026, and the final payment will be no later than February 1, 2046. TIF "pay -go" revenue note (the "TIF Note") to be issued to reimburse of $946,437 of qualified costs for the Project plus interest at rate to be set at the lesser of Redeveloper's actual mortgage financing rate, estimated for planning purposes to be 4.5%, from the date of issue per annum to the earlier of maturity or prepayment. Total estimated payments to the Redeveloper over 20 years is estimated to be $1,511,073, including principal and interest payments. The TIF Note will be payable solely from net available semi-annual tax increments. Net available semi-annual tax increments shall be based on 75.0% of the tax increment collected from the Project within the TIF District. The TIF Note shall bear simple, non -compounding interest from the date that the EDA has determined paid invoices, as paid by the Redeveloper, in compliance with the terms of the Agreement. • EDA will retain 25.0% of the increment to repay itself for qualified costs of the Project, including administrative costs and land contribution, among other qualified use of tax increments from the TIF District. Proposed terms will be subject to a modified and restated contract for private redevelopment between the Redeveloper and the EDA. • Use of tax increments to include reimbursement to the EDA for administration costs, the contribution of the Property, and reimbursement to the Redeveloper for site improvements and the costs of constructing affordable housing units. Monticello TIF 142 June 3, 2024 Page 3 Exhibit B provides a summary of the estimated tax increment cash flow from the TIF District. Review of Application for Assistance Northland conducted a review of the Redeveloper's application for modified financial assistance, along with other information provided by the Redeveloper as requested by Northland. Northland reviewed project cost estimates to ensure all anticipated sources and uses for the Project were properly included. Based on a review of the pro forma, as summarized in Exhibit C, for the Project and under current market conditions, we find that the Project, as proposed, may not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably near future. Due to the costs associated with construction of the affordable housing units, the Project as proposed is feasible only through assistance, in part, from TIF. This conclusion is supported by the following: ■ The Redeveloper plans for the approximate $8.6 million of project costs for the Project to be funded from equity (100%). The present value of the future payments on the TIF Note is estimated to reduce the effective cost of the Project by approximately $0.95 million. Based on estimated net operating income, the effective return without the public financial assistance is not at a level the Project would proceed. ■ The total estimated cost per unit for the Project is approximately $391,191 for the construction of 22 rental townhome units. Based on Northland's experience with similar projects and given the location of the Project, we find the estimated cost per unit to be reasonable. The estimated average gross monthly rent for units, in the estimated first stabilized year of the Project, is estimated at approximately $2,386 per month. A minimum of 40% of the units will be affordable at 60% of the average median income for Wright County. The annual total gross rental income for the Project is estimated at $630,000 in the first year of stabilized occupancy, before adjusting for estimated apartment vacancy and rental loss of 5%. The total annual expense, operating and non -operating, is estimated at $18,352 per unit. This includes all estimated costs, including utilities and property taxes, among other costs, including a replacement reserve. The cash -on -cash return is projected to reach an estimated 5.8% by year ten of stabilized operations with financial assistance, and 5.0% without assistance. Monticello TIF 1-42 June 3, 2024 Page 4 EXHIBIT A Monticello, MN Headwater Townhouse Project 22 Residential Rental Townhome Units Developer Sources and Uses of Funds for Construction Total % of Total Per Unit Sources of Funds Loan $0 0.0% $0 Equity $8,606,201 100.0% $391,191 Total Sources of Funds $8,606,201 100.0% $391,191 Uses of Funds Acquisition of property $1 0.00% $0 Building and site development $7,447,000 86.53% $338,500 Architecture and engineering $160,000 1.86% $7,273 Legal fees $15,000 0.17% $682 Off -set development costs $984,200 11.44% $44,736 Total Uses of Funds $8,606,201 100.00% $391,191 Number of Units* Source: Developer application 22 Monticello TIF 1-42 June 3, 2024 Page 5 EXHIBIT B City of Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 (Housing) Headwaters Townhouse Project Projected Tax Increment Cash Flow Taxable TIF Taxes Captured TIF to Net PV of Net Total Market Original Available District Payable Net Tax EDA Available Available Property Value Tax Rate TIF Year Year Capacity (25.0%) TIF (75.0%) TIF Taxes (TMV) 1 2026 8,600,000 105,521 86.877% 91,344 22,836 68,508 64,326 108,569 2 2027 8,686,000 106,596 86.877% 92,275 23,069 69,206 126,480 109,655 3 2028 8,772,860 107,682 86.877% 93,214 23,304 69,911 186,533 110,753 4 2029 8,860,589 108,779 86.877% 94,164 23,541 70,623 244,558 111,861 5 2030 8,949,194 109,886 86.877% 95,122 23,781 71,342 300,622 112,980 6 2031 9,038,686 111,005 86.877% 96,091 24,023 72,068 354,792 114,111 7 2032 9,129,073 112,135 86.877% 97,069 24,267 72,802 407,131 115,253 8 2033 9,220,364 113,276 86.877% 98,057 24,514 73,543 457,702 116,406 9 2034 9,312,568 114,428 86.877% 99,054 24,764 74,291 506,564 117,571 10 2035 9,405,693 115,592 86.877% 100,062 25,016 75,047 553,774 118,747 11 2036 9,499,750 116,768 86.877% 101,080 25,270 75,810 599,389 119,936 12 2037 9,594,748 117,956 86.877% 102,108 25,527 76,581 643,463 121,136 13 2038 9,690,695 119,155 86.877% 103,146 25,787 77,360 686,046 122,348 14 2039 9,787,602 120,366 86.877% 104,195 26,049 78,146 727,190 123,572 15 2040 9,885,478 121,590 86.877% 105,254 26,313 78,940 766,944 124,808 16 2041 9,984,333 122,825 86.877% 106,324 26,581 79,743 805,353 126,057 17 2042 10,084,176 124,073 86.877% 107,404 26,851 80,553 842,464 127,319 18 2043 10,185,018 125,334 86.877% 108,495 27,124 81,371 878,321 128,593 19 2044 10,286,868 126,607 86.877% 109,597 27,399 82,198 912,965 129,879 20 2045 10,389,737 127,893 86.877% 110,710 27,678 83,033 946,437 131,179 TOTAL = 2,014,765 503,691 1,511,073 946,437 3,175,009 Key Assumptions for Cash Flow: 1 Taxable market value (TMV) annual growth assumption = 1.00% 2 Original Tax Rate is based on Certified Original Tax Rate. 3 Election for captured tax capacity is 100.0% 4 Original Net Tax Capacity is calculated based on certified original TMV = $158,300, NTC calculated for rental property classification. 5 Present value (PV) of Net Available TIF is calculated based on semi-annual payments, 4.5% rate, and date of 6/1 /2025. 6 Available TIF is after deducting State Auditor Fee of 0.36%. 7 Net Available TIF is calculated at 75% of the Available TIF. Monticello TIF 1-42 June 3, 2024 Page 6 EXHIBIT C Monticello, MN Headwater Townhouse Project 22 Residential Rental Townhome Units Preliminary Estimated Pro Forma Calendar Year 2030 2035 2040 2045 Year of TIF District 5 10 15 20 Gross Income (before TIF) 791,261 967,776 1,184,015 1,448,991 Less Expenses and Reserve (before Real Estate Tax) (350,325) (420,927) (506,918) (611,883) Less Real Estate Tax (112,980) (118,747) (124,808) (131,179) Net Operating Income (NOI) 327,956 428,102 552,288 705,929 Plus TIF Revenue 71,342 75,047 78,940 83,033 NOI with TIF 399,297 503,149 631,228 788,962 Debt Service - - - - Net Cash Flow 399,297 503,149 631,228 788,962 Net Cash on Cash with TIF 4.6% 5.8% 7.3% 9.2% Net Cash on Cash without TIF 3.8% 5.0% 6.4% 8.2% Debt coverage with TIF - - - - Debt coverage without TIF - - - - Notes: 1/ Total Development Cost (TDC): 8,606,201 2/ Total Equity: 8,606,201 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 EXHIBIT V Boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 within Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 TIF District is inclusive of parcels within the TIF District and the adjacent roads and right of way LL N O N N m ZQ r 3 R n 0 DRAFT J U N E 3, 2024 15 CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) PRE -APPLICATION BUSINESS SUBSIDY APPLICATION BUSINESS ASSISTANCE FINANCING CHC Monticello Townhomes 11 LLC Legal name of applicant: 161 Rondo Avenue, Suite 825, St Paul, MN 55103 Address: 651-605-5222 Telephone number: Name of contact person: Wesley Butler REQUESTED INFORMATION Addendum shall be attached hereto addressing in detail the following: 1. A map showing the exact boundaries of proposed development. 2. Give a general description of the project including size and location of building(s); business type or use; traffic information including parking, projected vehicle counts and traffic flow; timing of the project; estimated market value following completion. 3. The existing Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use designation and zoning of the property. Include a statement as to how the proposed development will conform to the land use designation and how the property will be zoned. 4. A statement identifying how the increment assistance will be used and why it is necessary to undertake the project. 5. A statement identifying the public benefits of the proposal including estimated increase in property valuation, new jobs to be created, hourly wages and other community assets. 6. A written description of the developer's business, principals, history and past projects I understand that the application fee will be used for EDA staff and consultant costs and may be partially refundable if the request for assistance is withdrawn_ Refunds will be made at the discretion of the EDA Board and be based on the costs incurred by the EDA prior to withdraw of the request for assistance. If the initial application fee is insufficient, I will be responsible for additional deposits. SIGNATURE Applicant's signature: 4142 - �.Yt��t.'v� Date: Apri125,2024 CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Application for Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Assistance GENERAL INFORMATION: CHC Monticello Townhomes 11 LLC Business Name: Address: 161 Rondo Avenue, Suite 825, St Paul, MN 55103 L Type (Partnership, etc.): Limited Liability Company Authorized Representative: Description of Business: Wesley Butler Real Estate Development Legal Counsel: Winthrop & Weinstine 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 3500 Address: Minneapolis, MN 55402 FINANCIAL BACKGROUND: No 1. Have you ever filed for bankruptcy? Date: April 25, 2024 651-605-5222 Phone: Phone: No 2. Have you ever defaulted on any loan commitment? No 3. Have you applied for conventional financing for the project? 4. List financial references: Bremer Bank, Andrew Rickers (320-762-4705) — Alexandria, MN a. b. C. 612-604-6755 2 WE 5. Have you ever used Business Assistance Financing before? If yes, what, where and when? PROJECT INFORMATION: 71 Street West and Golf Course Road 1. Location of Proposed Project: Land contribution for $1, $1,650,000 TIT± 2. Amount of Business Assistance requested? 3. Need for Business Assistance: To provide affordable housing Monticello MF West LLC 4. Present ownership of site: 5. Number of permanent jobs created as a result of project? Approximately 3 FTEs $0 $750 thousand 6. Estimated annual sales: Present: Future: 7. Market value of project following completion: We estimate the value to be around $8.6 million for for the twin home project June 2024 8. Anticipated start date: FINANCIAL INFORMATION: 1. Estimated project related costs: a. Land acquisition b. Site development c. Building cost d. Equipment e. Architectural/engineering fee f. Legal fees g. Off -site development costs Completion Date: $ 1.00 **Incl. in Building Cost $7,447,000.00 $0.00 $160,000.00 $15,000.00 $984,200.00 December 2024 3 2. Source of financing: a. Private financing institution 1,230,000.00 (net amount) b. Tax increment funds 0.00 c. Other public funds 7,376,201.00 d. Developer equity PLEASE INCLUDE: 1. Preliminary fmancial commitment from bank. [NA] 2. Plans and drawing of project. [Fyovided w th h1W A1ppRRtioM] 3. Background material of company. [Ps°evidedl vdt h Phonse �] 4. Pro Forma analysis. [Atrcached] 5. Financial statements. P\TA] 6. Statement of property ownership or control. [CCaarrently oy,7ned by I`VI oa deefio DAFT" West LLC, property to he cc®rrveyed to CCHCC M ©nticeflo T'ownhomes H L LC at farad c1®snug] 7. Payment of application fee of $15,000 [P\TA,.] City of Monticello Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 Modification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-43 Housing TIF Districts Headwaters Townhome Project and Headwaters Villas Project Public Hearings on June 24 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7- 9 10 11 May 8 EDA request City Council call for hearing 12113 14 15 16 17 18 May 13 City Council calls for public hearing 19 20 21- 23 24 25 May 14 Last day for written notice to County Commissioner 26 27 28 29 30 31 May 24 Last day for notice and TIF plan and fiscal implications to County and School District S M T W T F S 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9I'll 0 11 M 13 14 15 June 10 Last day to submit public hearing notice to newspaper 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 June 13 Public hearing notice published in the newspaper 23 24 25M 27 28 29 June 24 Public hearing and adoption of modified TIF Disticts/TIF Plans C1� e,p u A C`, l ►� 30 June 26 EDA approval of TIF Districts S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9- 11 12 13 July 12 Submit modifications to County, State Auditor, and MN Dept of Revenue 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 - 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6i 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 . 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Notes: 1 City Council regular meeting dates. 2 Economic Development Authority (EDA) regular meeting dates. 3 Calendar does not include review by the Planning Commission. The TIF Districts will be modified. There is no proposed modification to the Central Monticello Redevelpoment Project No. 1. 4 City needs to confirm publication dates and is responsible for submitting notice to newspaper. Modification of TIF Districts � northland Public Finance 5/1/2024 CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 24, 2024, at approximately 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, relating to the proposed modification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 (the "TIF District") within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project"), and the proposed modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") relating to the TIF District, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081, and Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, all as amended. Copies of the proposed modifications to the TIF Plan (the "Modifications") will be on file and available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk at City Hall. The Modifications include an enlargement of the TIF District. The property included within the TIF District, as modified (the "Modified TIF District"), is located within the Redevelopment Project and the City. A map of the Redevelopment Project and the Modified TIF District therein is set forth below. Subject to certain limitations, tax increment from the Modified TIF District may be spent on eligible uses within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Project. [insert map] All interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their views orally or in writing prior to the hearing to City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ City Clerk 3 MN 190\170\952851.v l TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 EXHIBIT VI Boundaries of Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 DRAFT J U N E 3, 2024 16 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-42 EXHIBIT V Boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-42 within Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 TIF District is inclusive of parcels within the TIF District and the adjacent roads and right of way LL N o N N 11 ZQ f 5 DRAFT JUNE 3, 2024 15