Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 07-22-2024
1. Agenda Documents Documents: 07-22-24 AGENDA.PDF 2024-7-8 MINUTES CC SPEC (DRAFT).PDF 2024-7-8 MINUTES CC (DRAFT).PDF 2A PAYMENT OF BILLS.PDF 2B NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES.PDF 2C PROPERTY.PDF 2D DONATIONS.PDF 2E ELECTION JUDGES.PDF 2F LOCAL SALES TAX RESOLUTION.PDF 2G WRIGHT COUNTY DUCKS GAMBLING.PDF 2H LETS CHALK.PDF 21 COALITION OF UTILITY CITIES MEMBERSHIP.PDF 2J MASTERCRAFT DEVSTAGE PUD.PDF 2K GOOD NEIGHBOR.PDF 2L ZONING CODE MINING.PDF 2M WATER TREATMENT GEOTECHNICAL.PDF 2N IMPACT STUDIES.PDF 20 SCADA UPGRADES FINAL ACCEPTANCE.PDF 2P SCHOOL BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITIONS.PDF 2Q MISSISSIPPI RIVER OTTER CREEK STREAMBANK RESTORATION.PDF 3A DEEPHAVEN VACATION.PDF 3B TAX ABATE FM HOTEL.PDF AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 22, 2024 Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP (Academy Room) 4:30 p.m. Data Center Discussion 5:15 p.m. 2025 Budget Discussion Mayor: Lloyd Hilgart Council Members: Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie, Sam Murdoff 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from July 8, 2024 • Regular Meeting Minutes from June 8, 2024 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, except for referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates F. Council Liaison Update • Economic Development Authority (EDA) • Planning Commission G. Department Updates • Parks, Recreation & Arts Department Update • Construction Update 2. Consent Agenda — All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-62 accepting donations totaling $7,500 for the Farmers Market Power of Produce Kids Club, Music on the Mississippi, & Movie in the Park events and a donation of $8,000 from the Phillip LaVallee Memorial Fund for an AED at Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Park E. Consideration of adopting a Resolution 2024-63 appointing election judges for the 2024 Primary and General Elections F. Consideration of adopting a Resolution 2024-70 relating to the Imposition of a Sales and Use Tax and Calling for a Special Election Theron G. Consideration of approving a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle and bingo to be conducted by the Wright County Ducks Unlimited, Chapter 39 on September 9, 2024, at Monticello VFW Post 8731 H. Consideration of approving a special event permit for the Let's Chalk event August 23 — 25, 2024, including the closure of West Bridge Park, a portion of Walnut Street North & River Street, and a portion of Block 52 public parking lot and approval of a temporary liquor license for the Monticello Lions for the event. Applicant: Monticello Chamber of Commerce I. Consideration of authorizing a payment to the Coalition of Utility Cities (CUC) for Monticello's share of the 2024-2025 membership dues in the amount of $42,287 J. Consideration of approving Development Stage Planned Unit Development and rezoning to Planned Unit Development for a Phased Industrial Development including Industrial Service and Industrial Self -Storage as Principal Uses in the 1-2, Heavy Industrial District. Applicant: Tim Flander/Big Bear Holdings, LLC. K. Consideration of approving an Administrative Lot Combination and Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Permit for The Pointes at Cedar District for proposed Commercial Lodging and Restaurants as principal uses in the Populus Sub -District. Applicant: Ted Thompson o/b/o Monticello Hospitality Group LLC L. Consideration of approving an amendment to the Monticello City Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Section 153.0102 — Definitions, 153.028 — Specific Review Procedures & Requirements, 153.090 — Use Table, & 153.091— Use -Specific Standard related to Contractor's Yard —Temporary, and Extraction of Minerals/Materials as Principal Interim Uses including Definitions, Use -Specific Standards, and other regulations as necessary to define and limit the intent or application of the proposed amendment. Applicant: City of Monticello M. Consideration of authorizing Braun Intertec to provide geotechnical services for the construction of a water treatment plant at a total cost of $18,595 N. Consideration of authorizing impact studies and the approval of an escrow agreement with Frattalone Companies, Inc. 0. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-64 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $54,724.96 to Automatic Systems, Inc. for the 2021 SCADA Improvements project P. Consideration of approving the purchase of right-of-way for the School Boulevard Improvements Project and authorizing the Finance Director to make payment of such claims Q. Consideration of approving a professional services agreement with WSB for a feasibility study for Mississippi River and Otter Creek Restoration in the amount of $25,500 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings A. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-66 approving the vacation of drainage and utilitv easements as IeRally described for a portion of Deephaven 3 B. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Tax Abatement Agreement with Monticello Hospitalitv Group, LLC in support of a 98-room Fairfield By Marriott Hotel and associated restaurants development proposal 4. Regular Agenda 5. Adjournment MINUTES MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Monday, July 8, 2024 — 5:30 p.m. Academy Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie, and Sam Murdoff Absent: None Others: Angela Schumann, Matt Leonard, Sarah Rathlisberger, Tom Pawelk, Ron Hackenmueller, and Jennifer Schreiber 1. Call to Order Mayor Lloyd Hilgart called the workshop to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. 2025 Budget Discussion This was the first workshop to discuss the upcoming 2025 Budget. Sarah Rathlisberger, Finance Director, presented a timeline of action, with the Preliminary Levy being set at the September 23 Council meeting and the Final Levy at the December 9 Council meeting. As part of the presentation the group reviewed funding options, guiding principles, governmental funds, enterprise funds, internal service funds, and service level. As discussions continue over the next couple of months, City Council was encouraged to consider the following: public contributions prompted by private development; capital projects fund — completing projects versus a fund balance; and maintaining current assets versus expanding quality and capacity. 3. Adjournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Council Special Meeting Minutes —July 8, 2024 City Administrator REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 8, 2024 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie, and Sam Murdoff Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Hilgart called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Agenda Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the agenda. Councilmember Murdoff seconded. Motion carried unanimously. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from June 10, 2024 • Regular Meeting Minutes from June 24, 2024 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember Martie seconded. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments None. E. Public Service Announcements • Rachel Leonard, City Administrator, noted the following announcements: - 2023 Popular Annual Financial Report - MCC Community Block Party - Ellison Park Boat Ramp Closure F. Council Liaison Updates • Economic Development Authority (EDA) — Councilmember Hinz gave an update of the meeting held June 26, 2024. The EDA reviewed the TIF 1-42 plan modification and TIF 1-43 District modification. • Central Mississippi River Regional Planning Partnership — Councilmember Gabler stated that the group discussed their organizational structure. • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler gave an update of the meeting held July 2, 2024. The Commission held four public hearings that included a preliminary plat for Broadway Plaza, PUD for Mastercraft, City Council Minutes: July 8, 2024 Page 1 1 4 Conditional Use Permit for hospitality group, and ordinance on extraction/temporary construction. G. Department Updates • Construction Update — Matt Leonard gave an update on current construction projects. • Citizen Comments on Dundas Road Update — Rachel Leonard responded to the City Council and public on the comments made at the last City Council meeting on Dundas Road and its possible closure. Ms. Leonard commented on The Pointes at Cedar Master Plan and Small Area Plan. She noted that the plan does call for the removal of a section of Dundas Road. While the plan calls for removal, no official action has been taken to remove the portion of this road. These decisions will be made in the future as the plan develops. These developments won't be made until after residents vote on the local option sales tax on November 5, 2024. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Martie moved to adopt the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Hinz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Action taken: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total of $1,500,664.32. B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments. Action taken: Approved new hires for the DMV and Parks Department. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Action taken: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of approving a charitable gambling permit for the Monticello Grad Party for a raffle to be held October 25, 2024, at Nordic BrewPub, 530 Cedar Street. Action taken: Approved the gambling permit. E. Consideration of approving a special event permit for Wright Sherburne Pride Festival on July 20, 2024, at Ellison Park. Action taken: Approved the special event permit. F. Consideration of approving contract with Olson and Sons Electric for $63,118 and Monticello Plumbing, Heating & Air in the amount of $17,470 for work related to the undergrounding of electric utilities for the Downtown Roadway and Pedestrian Improvements Project. Action taken: Contracts were approved as presented. City Council Minutes: July 8, 2024 Page 2 1 4 G. Consideration of approving a contract to repair the fire suppression system at the Head End Building for a total cost of $71, 990.50. Action taken: Approved the contract as presented. H. Consideration of approving a temporary waiver of construction activities noise regulations, City Code 130.09 (3) for Lunda Construction for the Hwy 25 Mississippi River Bridge Project. Action taken: Approved the temporary waiver. 3. Public Hearings: A. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-61 vacating drainage and utilitv easements as legally described for a portion of Amax Addition Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, presented the item. She noted that the vacation of easements on the south property line of the Amax Addition will facilitate the platting of three parcels as the Cedar Street Storage Addition. Mayor Hilgart opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Hilgart closed the public hearing. Minimal discussion was held. Councilmember Murdoff moved to adopt Resolution 2024-61 vacating drainage and utility easements as legally described for a portion of Amax Addition. Councilmember Martie seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Regular Agenda: A. Consideration of approving a Public Interest Finding for the purchase of right-of- wav for the School Boulevard Intersection Improvements Proiect Matt Leonard, Public Works Director/City Engineer, gave an overview of the right-of-way purchases. Mr. Leonard noted that two roundabouts being constructed on School Boulevard require right-of-way purchases of seven parcels. Staff have been negotiating with property owners, and agreements were reached on four of the parcels. The other three parcels are still being negotiated. If agreements can't be made condemnation proceedings would need to commence. It was noted that both City staff and MnDOT agree a public interest finding should be signed that states it is in the public's best interest to construct the two roundabouts together. This would require that condemnation proceedings begin if right-of-way isn't secured by August 19, 2024. City Council Minutes: July 8, 2024 Page 3 1 4 There was minimal discussion on the item. Councilmember Martie moved approval of the public interest finding for the purchase of right-of-way for the School Boulevard Intersection Improvements Project. Councilmember Murdoff seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Adiournment: The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes: July 8, 2024 Page 4 1 4 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2A. Consideration of approving payment of bills Prepared by: Finance Director Reviewed by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date 7/22/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $2,140,706.62. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. I. Budget Impact: N/A II. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of bill and purchase card registers as presented. SUPPORTING DATA • Bill registers and purchase card registers Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date User: debbie.gulbrandson Printed: 7/16/2024 3:05 PM � MontiTY ce-o Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount ACH 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO 07/15/2024 9,287.00 ACH 1565 WELLS FARGO CORP TRUST SERVICE 07/15/2024 222,000.00 ACH 2282 MRI SOFTWARE 07/15/2024 264.00 ACH 2405 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges/Returi 07/15/2024 18,448.63 ACH 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC 07/15/2024 105.06 ACH 2439 DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT & ECON DEV 07/15/2024 3,008.34 ACH 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 07/15/2024 134,192.83 ACH 4263 CAYAN 07/15/2024 1,763.69 ACH 5147 MN PEIP 07/15/2024 58,974.68 ACH 6041 HEALTHEQUITY INC 07/15/2024 1,588.32 Total for 7/15/2024: 449,632.55 Report Total (10 checks): 449,632.55 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/22/2024 Approved by: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (7/16/2024 3:05 PM) Page 1 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date User: julie.cheney Printed: 7/18/2024 11:24 AM CITY OF � Monti*ce_o Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount ACH 1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY 07/23/2024 3,717.55 ACH 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 07/23/2024 10,417.64 ACH 1089 SARA CAHILL 07/23/2024 109.87 ACH 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 07/23/2024 78.00 ACH 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 07/23/2024 82,331.32 ACH 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 07/23/2024 1,073.90 ACH 1223 HAWKINS INC 07/23/2024 50.00 ACH 1273 KIWI KAI IMPORTS, INC. 07/23/2024 1,125.50 ACH 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, I 07/23/2024 2,389.80 ACH 1305 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 07/23/2024 522.91 ACH 1348 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 07/23/2024 100.00 ACH 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER 07/23/2024 5,625.00 ACH 1386 M-R SIGN CO INC 07/23/2024 300.91 ACH 1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 07/23/2024 992.51 ACH 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC 07/23/2024 2,721.49 ACH 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC 07/23/2024 291.60 ACH 1417 OSC OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY 07/23/2024 165.65 ACH 1518 TDS TELECOM 07/23/2024 344.00 ACH 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SE] 07/23/2024 70,514.63 ACH 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 07/23/2024 959.05 ACH 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 07/23/2024 270.00 ACH 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH 07/23/2024 195,900.86 ACH 1684 VINOCOPIA 07/23/2024 846.25 ACH 1726 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES 07/23/2024 1,272.47 ACH 1746 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS INC 07/23/2024 1,061.21 ACH 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH 07/23/2024 5,956.22 ACH 2407 ALL ELEMENTS 07/23/2024 1,000.00 ACH 2808 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO 07/23/2024 54,724.96 ACH 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC 07/23/2024 1,100.00 ACH 3829 STEVE LANGANKI 07/23/2024 1,790.00 ACH 4191 ELK RIVER GREENHOUSE LLC 07/23/2024 321.00 ACH 4475 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 07/23/2024 109.06 ACH 4502 ARVIG 07/23/2024 19,586.66 ACH 4513 AARON STAEHNKE 07/23/2024 73.00 ACH 4633 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 07/23/2024 533.84 ACH 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 07/23/2024 7,707.77 ACH 5201 DICK FAMILY, INC. 07/23/2024 2,996.10 ACH 5211 RANDI O'KEEFE KRIER 07/23/2024 1,946.88 ACH 5270 JUDITH KOVACS 07/23/2024 42.00 ACH 5426 NOVEL SOLAR TWO LLC 07/23/2024 34,401.70 ACH 5454 PROFESSIONAL CLEANING SERVICES 07/23/2024 11,645.00 ACH 5585 SBRK FINANCE HOLDINGS INC 07/23/2024 60.00 ACH 5588 DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC 07/23/2024 511.28 ACH 5709 BEN LUNDQUIST 07/23/2024 6,249.99 ACH 5730 BOURGET IMPORTS, LLC 07/23/2024 389.50 ACH 6100 MATTHEW STAHLMANN-MOSHER 07/23/2024 83.00 ACH 6231 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC 07/23/2024 723.49 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (7/18/2024 11:24 AM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount ACH 6251 STEPHEN W GRITTMAN 07/23/2024 12,302.00 ACH 6272 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING COMPA 07/23/2024 472.00 ACH 6285 NOKOMIS ENERGY LLC 07/23/2024 14,137.64 ACH 6297 MEYER CONTRACTING INC 07/23/2024 849,270.20 ACH 6300 NOVEL SOLAR ONE LLC 07/23/2024 5,757.67 ACH 6301 NOVEL SOLAR FIVE LLC 07/23/2024 255.42 ACH 6306 STONEBROOKE ENGINEERING INC 07/23/2024 17,543.10 ACH 6327 VICKI LEERHOFF 07/23/2024 127.00 ACH 6429 CAMENAE GUSTAFSON 07/23/2024 74.96 ACH 6435 GARY KRAFT 07/23/2024 100.00 ACH 6436 CHERI BUTLER 07/23/2024 346.95 128733 5660 ABSOLUTE PRINT GRAPHICS 07/23/2024 1,631.55 128734 5948 AE2 - ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC. 07/23/2024 16,015.75 128735 4928 AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING COR 07/23/2024 198.90 128736 3991 ANOKA RAMSEY COMMUNITY COLL] 07/23/2024 1,650.00 128737 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 07/23/2024 704.80 128738 5486 HEIDI BARTHEL 07/23/2024 40.00 128739 1067 BERNICK'S 07/23/2024 8,888.37 128740 4618 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 07/23/2024 39.34 128741 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & 07/23/2024 4,478.77 128742 1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC 07/23/2024 270.00 128743 5144 CASTING CREATIONS OF MN., INC 07/23/2024 540.27 128744 1117 COALITION OF UTILITY CITIES 07/23/2024 42,287.00 128745 6354 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP INC 07/23/2024 3,600.00 128746 1136 GORDON J DEHMER 07/23/2024 72.45 128747 1141 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT 07/23/2024 1,850.00 128748 4010 MARILYN DIRKSWAGER 07/23/2024 300.00 128749 2891 DISCOUNT POST & POLE 07/23/2024 361.80 128750 1147 DOUBLE D ELECTRIC INC 07/23/2024 1,734.41 128751 5510 E.H. RENNER & SONS 07/23/2024 1,175.00 128752 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 07/23/2024 3,367.08 128753 1179 FIRE SAFETY USA INC 07/23/2024 699.95 128754 6322 GLENBROOK BUILDING SUPPLY INC 07/23/2024 1,023.30 128755 1205 GRAINGER INC 07/23/2024 428.64 128756 5783 GRANITE CITY REAL ESTATE 07/23/2024 34,207.70 128757 6121 HOFFMAN CONSTRUCTION 07/23/2024 2,900.00 128758 6375 THE HOME CITY ICE COMPANY 07/23/2024 1,171.26 128759 5751 TODD JAMESON 07/23/2024 200.00 128760 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 07/23/2024 23,224.65 128761 5974 JOTL PROPERTIES, LLC 07/23/2024 1,560.60 128762 6248 JP BROOKS 07/23/2024 2,000.00 128763 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTEREE 07/23/2024 1,469.00 128764 1297 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC 07/23/2024 1,284.50 128765 3933 CHARLES LONG 07/23/2024 336.00 128766 6243 M & M EXPRESS SALES & SERVICE 07/23/2024 111.29 128767 6395 ANDREW MCCLURE 07/23/2024 200.00 128768 1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY 07/23/2024 867.30 128769 6294 MIDWEST GROUNDCOVER 07/23/2024 12,250.00 128770 5719 MIDWEST SOUND AND STAGE INC 07/23/2024 500.00 128771 5578 MINNESOTA CONCRETE LIFTING LLC 07/23/2024 1,675.00 128772 1355 MMBA - MN MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE A 07/23/2024 5,700.00 128773 1738 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 07/23/2024 11,508.00 128774 1349 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 07/23/2024 715.82 128775 1369 MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF COMME] 07/23/2024 5,000.00 128776 2512 MONTICELLO PLBG HTG AC LLC 07/23/2024 425.00 128777 6437 PENNI MORK 07/23/2024 100.00 128778 1913 NEW FRANCE WINE 07/23/2024 940.17 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (7/18/2024 11:24 AM) Page 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 128779 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC 07/23/2024 3,076.30 128780 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 07/23/2024 19,226.17 128781 5431 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 07/23/2024 1,135.31 128782 1450 RAILROAD MANAGEMENT CO III LLC 07/23/2024 758.28 128783 1453 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 07/23/2024 1,364.00 128784 1455 RED'S MARATHON 07/23/2024 55.00 128785 6433 WILLIAM REINHARDT 07/23/2024 3,150.00 128786 6335 LAURARUPRECHT 07/23/2024 2,136.11 128787 4705 S2 SERVICES INC 07/23/2024 2,499.99 128788 3751 CHRISTINE SCHYMA 07/23/2024 174.00 128789 6417 JASON SMALL 07/23/2024 60.00 128790 6438 MATTHEW SMITH I1 07/23/2024 100.00 128791 6013 JAMES W SORENSON 07/23/2024 1,650.71 128792 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPII 07/23/2024 13,884.59 128793 6434 NICOLE RAE STRAW 07/23/2024 92.00 128794 5482 SUPERIOR CAPITL HOLDINGS INC 07/23/2024 225.00 128795 2397 TOWMASTER 07/23/2024 612.20 128796 4859 TRIO SUPPLY COMPANY 07/23/2024 948.03 128797 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE 07/23/2024 2,184.35 128798 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC 07/23/2024 1,198.99 128799 6279 MELISSA WOJCHOUSKI 07/23/2024 200.00 128800 6253 YMCA OF THE NORTH 07/23/2024 1,092.97 128801 1589 ZIEGLER INC 07/23/2024 25.89 Total for 7/23/2024: 1,691,074.07 Report Total (127 checks): 1,691,074.07 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/22/24 Approved by: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (7/18/2024 11:24 AM) Page 3 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments Prepared by: Human Resources Manager Reviewed by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date 7/22/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to approve new hires and departures for city departments. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Council is asked to ratify the attached list of new hires and departures for the City. This listing includes full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary employees. The listing may also include status changes and promotions. I. Budget Impact: Positions are generally included in the budget. II. Staff Workload Impact: If new position, there may be some training involved. If terminated position, existing staff will cover hours as needed, until replacement. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of new hires and departures as identified on the attached list. SUPPORTING DATA • List of new hires and terminated employees. NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Effective Date Class Gabriella Witschen Voluntary MCC 12/27/2023 PT Emma Peters Voluntary MCC 5/29/2024 PT Noah Klinker Voluntary MCC 6/20/2024 PT Sydney Gasser Voluntary MCC 6/28/2024 PT Natalia Norton Voluntary MCC 6/28/2024 PT New Hire and Terms City Council 2024: 7/16/2024 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item N/A 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A N/A There is no report this City Council Cycle. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-62 accepting donations totaling $7,500 for the Farmers Market Power of Produce Kids Club, Music on the Mississippi, & Movie in the Park events and a donation of $8,000 from the Phillip LaVallee Memorial Fund for an AED at Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Park. Prepared by: City Clerk Reviewed by: Program & Operations Manager ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date: 7/22/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-62 accepting donations totaling $7,500 for the Farmers Market Power of Produce Kids Club, Music on the Mississippi, & Movie in the Park events and a donation of $8,000 from the Phillip LaVallee Memorial Fund for and AED at Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Park. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City Council is being asked to accept funds totaling $7,500 for the Farmers Market Power of Produce Kids Club, Music on the Mississippi, and Movie in the Park. • West Metro Buick GMC ($300) • Trinity Lutheran ($300) • Monticello American Legion ($500) • TDS Telecom ($300) • Uptown Eye Care ($300) • Sherburne State Bank ($300) • Healing Moments Counseling ($300) • LeBrun Electric ($300) • Arvig ($300) • Monti Nutrition ($300) • Von Hansons ($300) • Sweep Home MN ($300) • Liberty Bank MN ($3,000) — Music on the Mississippi • All Elements LLC ($700) — Movie in the Park As required by state statute, if the City accepts the donation of funds, the City Council is required to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. The donations City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 will be used to cover advertising and vendor reimbursement for produce distributed to kids through the Farmers Market Power of Produce Kids Club. They will also be used to cover band expenses for Music on the Mississippi and licensing and related expenses for Movie in the Park. The donation from the Phillip LaVallee Memorial Fund will be used to purchase and install an AED at the Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Park. Budget Impact: The donations will pay for expenses related to PoP Kids Club, Music on the Mississippi, Movie in the Park, and an AED at BCOL. Staff Workload Impact: Staff organizes the program and donation opportunities. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend adopting Resolution 2024-62 accepting the donations from various sponsors. SUPPORTING DATA • Resolution 2024-62 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-62 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE—F CASH West Metro Buick Farmers Market PoP $300 Trinity Lutheran Farmers Market PoP $300 Monticello American Legion Farmers Market PoP $500 TDS Telecom Farmers Market PoP $300 Uptown Eye Care Farmers Market PoP $300 Sherburne State Bank Farmers Market PoP $300 Healing Moments Counseling Farmers Market PoP $300 LeBrun Electric Farmers Market PoP $300 Arvig Farmers Market PoP $300 Monti Nutrition Farmers Market PoP $300 Von Hansons Farmers Market PoP $300 Sweep Home Farmers Market PoP $300 Liberty Bank Music on the Mississippi $3,000 All Elements LLC Movie in the Park $700 Phillip LaVallee Memorial Fund AED $8,000 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the purpose stated above. Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 22"6 day of July, 2024. Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-63 appointing election iudges to serve for the August 13, 2024 Primary Election and November 5, 2024 General Election Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item City Clerk Reviewed by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED 7/22/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-63 appointing election judges to serve for the 2024 Primary and General Elections. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Minnesota State Statue 20413.21 requires cities to appoint election judges to serve at primary and general elections. A Head Judge should also be designated as part of the appointment. The appointment of the judges is contingent upon them completing the necessary training, which is required every two years. Training is conducted by Wright County. The City Clerk is recommending appointing 61 judges, including city staff. The list also includes people who signed up at caucuses and were provided to us from the County. These individuals must be appointed first before any additional judges can be appointed. In addition to the judges appointed as part of the recommended resolution, staff anticipate the need for additional judges to work during the general election and are continuing to recruit. I. Budget Impact: Election judge compensation is included in the 2024 budget. II. Staff Workload Impact: The City Clerk and Administrative Assistant will be involved with elections to a greater degree than other staff. In the weeks leading up to the Primary and General Elections, staff time spent on elections will increase, including some staff overtime. It should be noted that State Election laws mandate certain hours for absentee and regular voting, some of which fall outside of regular City work hours. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend adopting the resolution appointing election judges. SUPPORTING DATA • Resolution 2024-63 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-63 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ELECTION JUDGES AND APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 13, 2024, PRIMARY ELECTION AND NOVEMBER 5, 2024, GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello is required by MS 20413.21, Sec. 2, to officially approve the appointment of election judges; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council hereby adopts the judges listed on the attached Exhibit A, hereto attached, as the official judges for the August 13, 2024, Primary Election and November 5, 2024, General Election with the understanding that amendments may be necessary to the appointments in order to fill vacancies and meet party requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Monticello that the names listed on Exhibit A, hereto attached, are the official Election Judges for the City of Monticello for the 2024 Primary and General Elections. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ON THIS 22"d DAY OF DULY, 2024. CITY OF MONTICELLO Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk EXHIBIT A ELECTION JUDGES - 2024 Election Cycle (Primary/General) as of July 18, 2024 name address Role Cindy Anderson Monticello Lead Judge Fred Anderson Monticello Head Judge Marge Arndt Monticello Judge John Barthel Monticello Head Judge Mary Barthel Monticello Judge Mike Beck Monticello Judge Tony Brion Monticello Judge Julie Cheney Staff/Judge Deanine Christy Monticello Judge Jeanne Christy Monticello Judge James Dickrell Monticello Judge Janet Doucette Monticello Judge Andrea Dubay Roseann Duran Monticello Head Judge Tracy Ergen Monticello Staff/Lead Judge Keri Erickson Monticello Judge John Falenschek Monticello Judge Bob Ferguson Staff/Judge Jacquelin Gordon Monticello Judge Carolyn Granger Monticello Staff/Judge Beth Green Staff/Lead Judge Sherri Hackenmueller Monticello Judge Alyssa Hanson Monticello Judge Brenda Harkman Monticello Judge Iris Marie Hoglund Harris Monticello Judge Roger Hedtke Monticello Judge Sue Hedtke Monticello Judge Katelyn Hillukka Monticello Judge Elizabeth Honer Monticello Judge Eldor Jordan Monticello Judge Lorene Kothenbeutel Monticello Judge Wanda Kraemer Clear Lake Judge Betty Lambert Monticello Judge Cheryl Latham Monticello Judge Renee Lee Monticello Judge Vicki Leerhoff Election Assistant Rachel Leonard Staff/Head Judge Elizabeth Lindrud Staff/Lead Judge Sharon Long Monticello Judge Mitchell Loukusa Monticello Judge name address Role Naomi Lundgren Monticello Judge Trevor Mack Staff/Judge IPatricia Mayer Monticello Judge IWayne Mayer Monticello Judge IMary Micke Monticello Judge ISharon Mros Monticello Judge (Danielle Murdoff Monticello Lead Judge IRoger Odell Monticello Judge ICindy Rademacher Monticello Lead Judge (David Richardson Monticello Judge IKandis Rousselow Staff/Judge (Cynthia Schmitt Monticello Judge Karol Scruggs Monticello Judge IBarbara Smida Monticello Judge IPatricia Sonju Thielman Monticello Judge ISandy Suchy Monticello Judge ISandy Thurber Monticello Judge (George Vanderloop Monticello Judge IBrad Wicklund Monticello Judge (Teri Willenbring Monticello Head Judge (Alice Witry Monticello Judge City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-70 relating to the Imposition of a Sales and Use Tax and Calling a Special Election Thereon with ballot language subiect to final review and comment by city attornev. Prepared by: Finance Director Reviewed by: Community Development Director ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date 7/22/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-70 relating to the Imposition of a Sales and Use Tax and Calling a Special Election Thereon with ballot language subject to final review and comment by city attorney. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION January 23, 2023: Adopted Resolution 2023-13 supporting the authority to impose a local sales tax to fund specific capital improvements providing a regional benefit, to establish the duration of the revenue to be raised by the tax, and to authorize the City to issue bonds supported by the sales tax revenue. June 27, 2023: Adopted Resolution 2023-52 approving Laws 2023, Chapter 64, Article 10, Section 40 relating to allowing the City of Monticello to impose a Local Sales Tax. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City of Monticello initiated an effort to enact a local option sales tax in early 2023. The first step was for the City Council to pass a resolution outlining the details of the proposed tax and specifying the projects proposed to be funded with the revenue. Monticello is proposing a % percent sales tax which the MN Department of Revenue estimates would raise approximately $1.4 million in revenue annually. The tax is proposed for 20 years or until $30 million is raised, whichever comes first. Following either the 20 years or the maximum revenue collection, the tax would expire. Revenue from the sales tax is proposed to be divided evenly between two projects: the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park and The Pointes at Cedar Recreational Area. Both are existing City Council priorities that would benefit from a designated funding source to facilitate completion. Both fit the state's requirements for regional use of sales tax revenue. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 Once the required documentation was submitted to the state legislature, City staff worked with Representative O'Neill and Senator Anderson to introduce our requested special legislation. Along with more than 30 other jurisdictions who made local sales tax requests, Monticello's legislation was included in the 2023 Omnibus Tax Bill. On June 27, 2023, the City Council adopted a resolution accepting the new law. Both the resolution and a local approval certificate were filed with the Office of the Secretary of State. The law gives the City of Monticello authority to go to the voters with the sales tax request in 2024, which is the next procedural step being considered by Council with the proposed resolution. The resolution calls for a special election and approves the draft ballot language. Although Monticello is proposing one tax, the referendum must include separate questions for each project. Only the ballot questions approved by voters may be funded by the sales tax. If only one project is approved, the % percent tax rate remains the same but the timeline and total revenue eligible to be collected would be reduced. If the tax is approved by the voters, the City will receive the funds through the Minnesota Department of Revenue beginning in 2025. The collected revenues can be used to fund projects on a pay-as-you-go basis, or the City can choose to issue bonds which would then be paid back using local sales tax revenues. Finally, the City may not expend any money or resources, including staff time, promoting passage of the general local sales tax on the ballot. The City can provide information on the projects and facts on the local sales tax calculations. I. Budget Impact: Potentially, $30,000,000 over the next 20 years. If imposed, a separate fund or funds will be created to track proceeds and uses for each project approved. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff estimates approximately ten hours of time specific to this step in the process to enact a local option sales tax. Staff time on the steps preceding and following this requested action has been and will be significant. Pending enaction of the local option sales tax, tracking and reporting on the general local sales tax will fall under the normal duties of the Finance department. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Monticello 2040 Plan's Implementation Chapter cites specific policies in support of funding alternatives for Monticello's park and recreation facilities. These include identification of adequate funding sources for long-term capital improvements and maintenance planning (Policy 1.2.2) and implementation of funding mechanisms for phased development of the regional athletic park at Bertram Chain of Lakes (Strategy 3.3.2). In addition, in 2021, the City amended the 2040 Plan to adopt The Pointes Small Area Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 City staff recommends adopting the draft resolution as submitted. The proposed use of the sales tax as a funding tool allows the City to capture revenue from regional visitors to Monticello for two projects which will in turn continue to benefit the greater region. Consistent with past Council direction, the implementation of the sales tax tool supports a continued phased and multi -pronged approach to the completion of these two projects. SUPPORTING DATA A. Draft Resolution 2024-70 B. Certificate of Approval of Special Law by Governing Body C. Resolution 2023-13 D. Resolution 2023-52 E. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2023/0/Session+Law/Chapter/64/ RESOLUTION NO. 2024 - 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RELATING TO THE IMPOSITION OF A SALES AND USE TAX AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION THEREON WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 297A.99 (the "Local Tax Act"), provides the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), with the authority to impose a local sales tax if that tax is approved by the voters at a general election and the State of Minnesota (the "State") Legislature (the "Legislature") approves the local sales tax through the creation of a special law; and WHEREAS, the Legislature passed and the Governor of the State signed, Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 64, Article 10, Section 40 (the "Special Law") which authorizes the City to, among other things, impose a sales and use tax of up to one-half of one percent, if approved by the voters as required by the Local Tax Act; and WHEREAS, the Special Law is effective upon approval by a majority vote of the City Council of the City (the "Council") and the filing of a certificate (the "Certificate") with the Secretary of State, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3, and the Council approved the Special Law on June 26, 2023, and the City filed the Certificate with the Secretary of State on June 29, 2023. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Council proposes to submit to electors questions regarding whether to impose a local sales and use tax of one-half of one percent (the "Taxes") on items that are taxable by the State in order to raise revenues to finance (i) the new construction and rehabilitation of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park (the "Bertram Lakes Project") and (ii) the new construction and improvement of the Pointes at Cedar Recreation Area (the "Pointer at Cedar Project"), including securing and paying debt service on bonds issued to finance such projects and associated bond issuance costs. The questions of imposing the Taxes shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the City as city ballot questions as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto. 2. The Taxes are proposed to be collected for approximately 20 years or until amounts equal to $15,000,000 related to the Bertram Lakes Project and/or $15,000,000 related to the Pointes at Cedar Project, plus the costs of collecting and administering the tax and an amount sufficient to pay the costs related to issuance of any bonds for the projects, including interest on the bonds is collected, in accordance with the Special Law. 3. The questions set forth in Exhibit A shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the City at a special election which is hereby called and directed to be held in conjunction with the general election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024. 5. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 204D.24, the precincts and polling places for this special election are those precincts which have been established by the City for its municipal elections. The voting hours at those polling places shall be the same as those for municipal general elections. 6. The City Clerk is directed to cause a sample ballot in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A and a notice of election in substantially the form attached as Exhibit B to be posted, published, MN 190\177\964094.v 1 printed and delivered as required by law. 7. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to acquire and distribute such election materials and to take such other actions as may be necessary for the proper conduct of this special election and generally to cooperate with election authorities conducting other elections on that date. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take such actions as may be necessary to coordinate this election with those other elections, including entering into agreements with appropriate county officials regarding preparation and distribution of ballots or ballot cards, election administration, and cost sharing. 8. If the City will be contracting to print the ballots for this special election, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to prepare instructions to the printer for layout of the ballot. Before a contract in excess of $1,000 is awarded for printing ballots, the printer shall furnish, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 204D.04, a sufficient bond, letter of credit or certified check acceptable to the City Clerk in an amount not less than $1,000 conditioned on printing the ballots in conformity with the Minnesota election law and the instructions delivered. The City Clerk shall set the amount of the bond, letter of credit or certified check in an amount equal to the value of the purchase. 9. Election judges shall be appointed for this special election shall be the election judges appointed for the city general election. The election judges shall act as clerks of election, count the ballots cast, and submit the results to the Council for canvass in the manner provided for other City elections. 10. The special election shall be held and the returns made and canvassed in the manner prescribed by law, and the Council shall meet on November 12, 2024 (a date between three and ten days after the election) for the purpose of canvassing the results thereof. Moved by Councilmember , seconded by Councilmember The following voted in favor of said resolution: The following voted against the same: The following abstained: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, and attested by the Clerk dated this 22nd day of July, 2024. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 2 MN 190\177\964094.v 1 EXHIBIT A CITY BALLOT QUESTIONS CITY OF MONTICELLO STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL ELECTION November 5, 2024 To vote for a question, fill in the oval next to the word "YES" for that question. To vote against a question, fill in the oval next to the word "NO" for that question. CITY BALLOT QUESTIONS IMPOSITION OF SALES TAX FOR BERTRAM REGIONAL ATHLETIC PARK Shall the City of Monticello be authorized to (a) impose a temporary sales and use tax of one-half of one percent (0.5%) to finance new construction and rehabilitation of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park for the earlier of 20 years or until $15,000,000 plus the cost of administering the tax and associated bonding costs including interest is collected, and to (b) issue general obligation bonds for such project in the principal amount noted in (a), plus the cost of issuing the bonds including interest? If one or both questions are approved by a majority of voters, the City is only authorized to impose a single one-half of one percent (0.5%) sales and use tax for a maximum of 20 years or until enough sales tax revenue has been raised to pay for the costs of the voter -approved projects. O YES O NO IMPOSITION OF SALES TAX FOR POINTES AT CEDAR RECREATION AREA Shall the City of Monticello be authorized to (a) impose a temporary sales and use tax of one-half of one percent (0.5%) to finance new construction and improvements to The Pointes at Cedar Recreation Area for the earlier of 20 years or until $15,000,000 plus the cost of administering the tax and associated bonding costs including interest is collected, and (b) issue general obligation bonds for such project in the principal amount noted in (a), plus the cost of issuing the bonds including interest? If one or both questions are approved by a majority of voters, the City is only authorized to impose a single one-half of one percent (0.5%) sales and use tax for a maximum of 20 years or until enough sales tax revenue has been raised to pay for the costs of the voter -approved projects. O YES O NO A-1 MN 190\177\964094.v 1 EXHIBIT B NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION CITY OF MONTICELLO STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL ELECTION November 5, 2024 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special election has been called and will be held in conjunction with the state general election in the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. to vote on the following questions: CITY BALLOT QUESTIONS IMPOSITION OF SALES TAX FOR BERTRAM REGIONAL ATHLETIC PARK Shall the City of Monticello be authorized to (a) impose a temporary sales and use tax of one-half of one percent (0.5%) to finance new construction and rehabilitation of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park for the earlier of 20 years or until $15,000,000 plus the cost of administering the tax and associated bonding costs including interest is collected, and to (b) issue general obligation bonds for such project in the principal amount noted in (a), plus the cost of issuing the bonds including interest? If one or both questions are approved by a majority of voters, the City is only authorized to impose a single one-half of one percent (0.5%) sales and use tax for a maximum of 20 years or until enough sales tax revenue has been raised to pay for the costs of the voter -approved projects. O YES O NO IMPOSITION OF SALES TAX FOR POINTES AT CEDAR RECREATION AREA Shall the City of Monticello be authorized to (a) impose a temporary sales and use tax of one-half of one percent (0.5%) to finance new construction and improvements to The Pointes at Cedar Recreation Area for the earlier of 20 years or until $15,000,000 plus the cost of administering the tax and associated bonding costs including interest is collected, and (b) issue general obligation bonds for such project in the principal amount noted in (a), plus the cost of issuing the bonds including interest? If one or both questions are approved by a majority of voters, the City is only authorized to impose a single one-half of one percent (0.5%) sales and use tax for a maximum of 20 years or until enough sales tax revenue has been raised to pay for the costs of the voter -approved projects. O YES O NO B-1 MN 190\177\964094.v 1 The precincts and polling places for this special election are those precincts which have been established by the City for state general elections. These polling places are as follows: MONTICELLO P-1 POLLING PLACE LOCATION — Monticello Community Center Gymnasium, 505 Walnut St., Monticello, MN MONTICELLO P-2 POLLING PLACE LOCATION — Resurrection Lutheran Church, 9300 Jason Avenue NE, Monticello, MN MONTICELLO P-3 POLLING PLACE LOCATION — Monticello High School Fieldhouse, 5225 School Boulevard, Monticello, MN MONTICELLO P-4 POLLING PLACE LOCATION — Grace Bible Church, 300 Riverview Drive, Monticello, MN MONTICELLO ABSENTEE POLLING PLACE LOCATION — City Hall, 505 Walnut St., Monticello, MN Any eligible voter residing in the City may vote at said election at the polling place designated above. The polls for said election will be open between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on the date of said election. A voter must be registered to vote to be eligible to vote in this election. An unregistered individual may register to vote at the polling places on election day. Dated: , 2024 B-2 MN 190\177\964094.v1 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), hereby certify that the attached and foregoing is a full, true, and correct transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, so far as such minutes relate to the calling of an election on the imposition of a sales and use tax to finance (i) the new construction and rehabilitation of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park and (ii) the new construction and rehabilitation of the Pointes at Cedar Recreation Area, and that the resolution included therein is a full, true, and correct copy of the original thereof. WITNESS MY HAND officially as such City Clerk this _ day of 12024. City Clerk City of Monticello State of Minnesota MN 190\177\964094.v 1 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF SPECIAL LAW BY GOVERNING BODY (Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 645.02 and 645.021) STATE OF MINNESOTA County of Wright TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MINNESOTA: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, That the undersigned chief clerical officer of the City of Monticello DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, that in compliance with the provisions of Laws, 20 23 , Chapter 64 requiring approval by a majority* of the governing body of said local governmental unit before it becomes effective, the City Council (designate governing body) at a meeting duly held on the 26th day of June 20 23 , by resolution 2023-52 did approve said Laws, 2023 , Chapter 64 (if other than resolution, specify) by a majority vote* of all of the members thereof (Ayes 5 Noes 0 Absent or not voting 0 ) and the following additional steps, if any required by statute or charter were taken: A copy of the resolution is hereto annexed and made a part of this '',y certifiate reference. Sig' i d: XNtA, r�L City Cle (Official designation of officer) (This form prescribed by the Attorney General and furnished by the Secretary of State as required in Minnesota Statutes 645.021.) ■If extraordinary majority is required by the special law, insert fraction or percentage here. Please see reverse side for instructions for completing this form. S:\IDECTELECTAPENAPP CERnPICATE OF APPROVAL OF SPECIAL LAW.dm CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.2023-52 RESOLUTION APPROVING MINNESOTA LAWS 2023, CHAPTER 64, ARTICLE 10, SECTION 40, ALLOWING THE CITY OF MONTICELLO TO IMPOSE A LOCAL SALES TAX WHEREAS, State of Minnesota (the "State") Legislature passed and the Governor of the State signed Minnesota Laws 2023, Regular Session, Chapter 64, Article 10, Section 40 (the "Law"), which authorizes the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") to, among other things, impose a sales and use tax if approved by the voters at an election as requested under Minnesota Statutes, Section 297A.99, subdivision 3; and WHEREAS, the Law is effective upon approval by a majority vote of the City Council of the City (the "City Council") and the filing of a certificate with the Secretary of State, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and its residents to approve the Law. NOW 'THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that: 1. The Law is hereby approved in all respects. 2. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file with the Secretary of State a certified copy of this resolution and the appropriate certificate in the form prescribed by the State Attorney General. 3. City staff are authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to implement the Law and bring to the City Council further proceedings as necessary in order to implement the Law. Adopted by the City Council of Monticello on this 26th day of June, 2023. �r, Lloyd HilgaW, MayoV CJ nifer �chr ih City Clerk Document Number: 236527 Filed on June 29, 2023 Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State, Steve Simon Document Number: 236526 Filed on June 29, 2023 Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State, Steve Simon MN 190\ 101 \884250.v2 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2023-13 Resolution supporting the authority to impose a local sales tax to fund specific capital improvements providing regional benefit, to establish the duration of the tax and the revenue to be raised by the tax, and to authorize the City to issue bonds supported by the sales tax revenue. WHEREAS, the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") has engaged community residents and businesses and identified two community projects of regional benefit including: (i) the acquisition, construction and equipping of various improvements to the future Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park, including but not limited to an athletic park with various sports fields and related amenities to host game play, practices, and tournaments, recreational and pedestrian trails, playgrounds, tennis courts, skating rinks, a parking lot, lighting, concessions and restrooms, located within Monticello Township and jointly owned by Wright County, at an estimated cost of $22,000,000 (the "Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park") ; and (ii) the acquisition, construction and equipping of various improvements to the future Pointes at Cedar Recreation Area, including but not limited to a stormwater pond, which will serve as a significant recreational water feature, surrounded by a series of recreational pedestrian trails and interconnected public spaces for discovery, at an estimated cost of $63,000,000 (the "Pointes at Cedar Recreation Area" and together with the Bertram Project Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park, the "Projects"); WHEREAS, the Projects will result in benefits to both the residents and businesses of the City and to non-resident visitors and businesses; and, WHEREAS, funding a portion of the Projects with a local sales tax will more closely distribute the cost of the Projects to the users of the facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Projects are estimated to cost approximately $85,000,000 including $22,000,000 for the Betram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park and $63,000,000 for the Pointes at Cedar Recreation Area plus an amount equal to interest on and the costs of issuance of any bonds; and, WHEREAS, the City estimates that a local sales tax of 0.50 percent would generate $30,000,000 over 20 years; and, WHEREAS, the City has provided documentation of the regional significance of each project, including the share of the economic benefit to or use of each project by persons residing, or businesses located, outside of the jurisdiction including but not limited to materials DOCSOPENNN 190\177\851396.vl -1 /19/23 attached hereto as Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the estimated local sales tax revenue and estimated time needed to raise that amount of revenue for a portion of each project is as follows: - For the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park: The City will collect $15,000,000 over 10 years. - For the Pointes at Cedar Recreation Area: The City will collect $15,000,000 over 10 years. - Plus for the costs of collecting and administering the tax and the costs of issuing any bonds including interest on any bonds issued supported by sales tax revenue. WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 297A.99 authorizes the imposition of a general sales tax if permitted by special law of the Minnesota Legislature; and, WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 297A.99 requires the City to pass a resolution authorizing such a local tax and to obtain Legislative approval prior to approval by the local voters to enact the local tax; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the following: 1. The City Council supports the authority to impose a general local sales tax of 0.50 percent for a period of 20 years to fund a portion the aforementioned Projects; 2. Upon approval of this resolution, the City will submit the adopted resolution and documentation of regional significance to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Taxes committees for approval and passage of a special law authorizing the tax, by January 31 of the year that it is seeking the special law. 3. Upon Legislative approval and passage of the special law authorizing the tax, the City will adopt a resolution accepting the new law, which will be filed with a local approval certificate to the Office of the Secretary of State before the following Legislative session. 4. The City will put detailed ballot questions, which include separate questions for each of the Projects and authority for issuance of bonds, on a general election ballot for local voter approval. This will be done within two years of receiving legislative authority. 5. If one or more ballot questions pass, the City will also pass an ordinance imposing the tax and notify the commissioner of Revenue at least 90 days before the first day of the calendar quarter that the tax will be imposed. 6. Upon completion of the aforementioned requirements, the local sales tax will commence and run for 20 years or until a sum sufficient to fund a portion of the voter approved Projects, including amounts sufficient to pay interest on the costs of issuing DOCSOPEN\M N 1 90\1 77\851396.v 1-1 /19/23 any bonds, is raised, whichever comes first. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 23rd day of January, 2023. CITY OF MONTICELLO � zW'4!r it • • W• ATTEST: Jen fifer Sber, City Clerk ICJ DOCSOPEN\MN 190\177\851396.vl -1 /19/23 EXHIBIT A DOCUMENTATION OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE DOCSOPEN\MN 190\177\851396.v1-1 /19/23 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.2023-52 RESOLUTION APPROVING MINNESOTA LAWS 2023, CHAPTER 64, ARTICLE 10, SECTION 40, ALLOWING THE CITY OF MONTICELLO TO IMPOSE A LOCAL SALES TAX WHEREAS, State of Minnesota (the "State") Legislature passed and the Governor of the State signed Minnesota Laws 2023, Regular Session, Chapter 64, Article 10, Section 40 (the "Law"), which authorizes the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") to, among other things, impose a sales and use tax if approved by the voters at an election as requested under Minnesota Statutes, Section 297A.99, subdivision 3; and WHEREAS, the Law is effective upon approval by a majority vote of the City Council of the City (the "City Council") and the filing of a certificate with the Secretary of State, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and its residents to approve the Law. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that: 1. The Law is hereby approved in all respects. 2. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file with the Secretary of State a certified copy of this resolution and the appropriate certificate in the form prescribed by the State Attorney General. 3. City staff are authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to implement the Law and bring to the C-ty Council further proceedings as necessary in order to implement the Law. Adopted by the City Council of Monticello on this 26th day of June, 2023. Cie - fifer S ei e ,City Clerk Lloyd 21filgart, Mayo' MN 190\ 101 \884250.v2 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2G. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle and bingo to be conducted by the Wright County Ducks Unlimited, Chapter 39 on September 9, 2024, at the Monticello VFW Post 8731 Prepared by: City Clerk Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED City Administrator Motion to approve the temporary gambling permit for the Wright County Ducks Unlimited, Chapter 39 for an event on September 9, 2024, at the VFW, 713 S. Cedar St. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Wright County Ducks Unlimited has applied for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be held on September 9, 2024. The event is being held at the VFW, 713 S. Cedar Street. The permit will allow for bingo and a raffle to be held. To receive a permit from the State, the City must approve the application. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend approval of the temporary gambling permit. SUPPORTING DATA • Application MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING LG220 Application for Exempt Permit An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: • conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and • awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to your county by calling 651-539-1900. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION 4/23 Page 1 of 3 Application Fee (non-refundable) Applications are processed in the order received. If the application is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. Organization j�, q Previous Gambling/ i Name: + � �, re. ct", Permit Number: X- Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID Number, if any: Number (FEIN), if any: Mailing Address: /0 / & VC41, City: �A � State: 0 Zip: 5T 3 0 County: Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO): CEO Daytime Phone: 7� J- b 0 -))?CEO Email: A4 ( s `+a to h_4 1 permit t. Vill/►be emailed to this email address unless otherwise indicated below) Email permit to (if other than the CEO): V_ 4f � C) �T` C(-'� t P S . ( `ywt If NONPROFIT STATUS Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): Fraternal Religious Veterans Other Nonprofit Organization Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status, (DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.) F-1 A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers: 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803, or toll free 1-877-551-6767 F_� IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500. IRS - Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter) If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling; and 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted ,/�9/ (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): �' 4 C Physical Address (do not use P.O. box): --7 C Ct AU ✓ Check one: j� �� j �� f4` A./- City: t9 �` C t ( Zip: ' County. ' ❑ Township: Zip: County: Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): <S—e p L 4,co,, / ; o �- T Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: Bingo Paddlewheels Pull -Tabs Tipboards Raffle Gambling equipment for bingo paper, bingo boards, raffle boards, paddlewheels, pull -tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo ball selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the List of Licensees tab, or call 651-539-1900. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 4/23 Page 2 of 3 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located within city limits The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a 1st class city). FIThe application is denied. Print City Name: Signature of City Personnel: Title: Date: The city or county must sign before submitting application to the Gambling Control Board. COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located in a township The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. F-1 The application is denied. Print County Name: Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date: TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to Ae Board within 30 days of the vent date. -7 Chief Executive Officer's Signature: Date: t fxt�l_ Signature must be CEO's signature; designee may not sign) Print Name. / C 4_eJI� ('V �,i �e C_ REQUIREMENTS MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Complete a separate application for: Mail application with: • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days; or a copy of your proof of nonprofit status; and • all gambling conducted on one day. application fee (non-refundable). If the application is Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, conducted on the same day. the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota. gambling activity is done: To: Minnesota Gambling Control Board A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Roseville, MN 55113 Board. Questions? Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). 651-539-1900. Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to supply the information; however, if your organization refuses to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your organization's qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your organization supplies the information requested, the Board will be able to process the application. Your organization's name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All other information provided will be private data about your organization until the Board issues the permit. When the Board issues the permit, all information provided will become public. If the Board does not issue a permit, all information provided remains private, with the exception of your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about your organization are available to Board members, Board staff whose work requires access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- ment of Public Safety; Attorney General; Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota Management & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this notice was given; and anyone with your written consent. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. An equal opportunity employer MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING LG220A Exempt Permit Financial Report 11/23 • By state law, organizations that received an exempt permit (using the LG220 application form) are required to submit a financial report within 30 days of each gambling occasion (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(a)(6)). • Complete the information below. Email, fax or mail to the Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the gambling activity date. • Your organization must keep all exempt raffle records and reports for 3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Organization Name: J %(r0 1 J U� j� +'�•i)-eGV bik y, ffa /� / Mailing Address: ���� t u " R Hop, Lf'f'�:� /J✓ �i �' (� State: /�'�� Zip: j�31A Activity Dates: qto Exempt Permit Number X r Name of premises where the gambling event occurred: Kr" 0.41V (For raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place) � C iFINANCIAL REPORT Activity conducted Bingo Raffle Paddlewheel Tipboard Pull -Tabs Gross receipts for each activity DISTRIBUTOR INFORMATION Expenses, including Net profit cost of purchased and (subtract expenses cash prizes from gross receipts) 70 _ Total Value of Prizes Purchased (full retail value) 'Donated (full retail value) Cash total face value of dollars awarded) —/� C/! � —0 If paddlewheels, bingo, tipboards, or pull -tabs are conducted, list the licensed distributor from whom the gambling equipment was purchased. Distributor: Date of Purchase: ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) I declare that all financial information is true, accurate, and complete. Print Name of Current CEO: Signature of Current CEO: J Email: k(a J � `?-P C � "mod-- / � r '6 Phone: (7� 3) 07 3 Date Signed: Sa 7 �` MAIL OR FAX TO: DATA PRIVACY NOTICE: Minnesota Gambling Control Board The information on this form and any attachments 1711 W County Road B, Suite 300 South will become public information when received by Roseville, MN 55113 the Board and will be used to determine your EMAIL: gcb.financialreports@state.mn.us compliance with Minnesota statutes and rules FAX: 651-639-4032 governing lawful gambling activities. Questions? Contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to your county by calling 651-539-1900. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2H. Consideration of approving a special event permit for the Let's Chalk event August 23 - 25, 2024 including the closure of West Bridge Park, a portion of Walnut Street North & River Street, and a portion of Block 52 public parking lot and approval of a temporary liquor license for the Monticello Lions for the event. Applicant: Monticello Chamber of Commerce Prepared by: Parks, Arts & Recreation Director Reviewed by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED Meeting Date: 7/22/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ® Consent Agenda Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to approve a Special Event Permit for Let's Chalk on August 24 & 25, 2024, including the closure of West Bridge Park, a portion of Walnut Street North & River Street, and a portion of Block 52 public parking lot and approval of a temporary liquor license for the Monticello Lions for the event. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Let's Chalk event is a two-day street art festival with entertainment, food, and family fun. This free event will feature bright, bold, and even 3D art from professionals, amateurs, and enthusiasts from across the globe. The event is open to the public from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. so spectators can watch the masterpieces take shape. In its initial years, the Let's Chalk event was a city -hosted event. However, in 2024 it was determined that it can be more appropriately hosted as a private event with the option for city assistance typical of public events in the community. To facilitate that change, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce agreed to act as fiscal agent for Let's Chalk, a role more appropriate for the Chamber than the City. The 2024 Let's Chalk event will take place at West Bridge Park and will also use Walnut Street & River Street and a portion of the Block 52 public parking lot. City Council approval is requested for street closures in effect beginning Friday evening, August 23 through Sunday evening, August 25. A detailed map is included for review. The Monticello Chamber is requesting the Street Departments provide barricades, cones, and signs for the street and lot closures. The Park Department will help with picnic tables and trash receptacles for the event. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 All emergency personnel were notified of the event and the Wright County Sheriff's Reserves will attend to assist with traffic control and pedestrian safety as well as be available in case of an emergency. I. Budget Impact: N/A II. Staff Workload Impact: City staff will haul tables and garbage cans and set up roads for closures. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Monticello 2040 Plan emphasizes the importance of art programming, cultural expression, and community events. While no longer a city hosted event, Let's Chalk continues to be a strong opportunity for placemaking and community connection. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend approving the Special Event Permit and providing the requested assistance. SUPPORTING DATA A. Application B. Event Map C. Liquor License Application CITY O F CITY OF MONTICELLO City Clerk 505 Walnut Street, Sulte 1 Special Event Permit MN 55362 Monticeflo Monticello,Application Checklist (763) 295-2711 info(&ci.monticello.mn.us s PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address 107 River St, Monticello, MN 55362 Property Legal Description West Bridge Park Property ID Number PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION, Owner Name City of Monticello Owner Address 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362 Owner Phone 763-295-2711 Owner Email Linfo@monticello.mn.us Applicant Name Monticello Chamber of Commerce & Industry Applicant Address 118 W 6t" St, Suite B, PO Box 192, Monticello, MN 55362 Applicant Phone 763-295-2700 Applicant Email info@ monticellocci.com Name of Event Monticello Chambers Let's Chalk Location/Address of Event 107 River St, Monticello, MN 55362 Dates & Times of Event August 24 & 25 (close lot Friday August 23) Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria Approval of a Special Event Permit shall only be granted once the City Clerk has determined the use shall: • Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; • Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; • Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; • Not include permanent alterations to the site; • Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends; • Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site; • Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and • Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands. • Not create an unreasonable risk of significant: I. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear; 2. Injury to persons; 3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances; 4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel; 5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and 6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare. The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event. The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval In approving the Special Event Permit, the City Clerk's Office is authorized to impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require: 1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress. 2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat. 3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards. 4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities. 5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal. 6. Provision of security and safety measures. 7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event. 8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities. 9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection. 10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition. 3 UPPImonticello Chamber of Commerce & Industry Event Name: Monticello Let's Chalk Date: August 23rd (Friday) to August 25th (Sunday) Time: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Location: West Bridge Park, Monticello Description: Let's Chalk is a two-day street art festival with entertainment, food, and family fun. This free event will feature bright, bold, and even 3D art from professionals, amateurs, and enthusiasts from across the globe. The event is open to the public, Saturday & Sunday from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. so spectators can watch the masterpieces take shape. Street Closures: We kindly request council approval for street closures on Walnut Street West and River Street, as well as a portion of Block 52 Public parking lot. These closures will be in effect from Friday evening, August 23rd, through Sunday evening, August 25th. A detailed map is included for your review. Logistics: • The Monticello Chamber requests a waiver of the permit fee. • Street Departments are asked to provide barricades, cones, and signs for the designated closures. • The Parks Department will support us by organizing portable restrooms and arranging picnic tables and trash receptacles. • The Monticello Lions will efficiently serve corndogs from the West Bridge Park shelter. • City staff will operate a Local Option Tax information booth within the park. • Emergency personnel have been informed, and the Wright County Sheriff's Reserves will assist with traffic control and pedestrian safety and provide a visible presence in case of an emergency. Additional Requests: • 50 picnic tables in West Park and surrounding event area • 20 trash barrels Mk VIM -do=, +Vie t col- 1► � Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Name of organization LA&-./4 to L Address f PO emu• coi 3 Name of person making application I(- V__e ) o n r-5 Date(s) of event OrrgaA{\niz}a�fti/onofficer's` name Organization officer's name Organization officer's name 77 t�CJ b — L o to vi jOrganization officer's name Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Location where permit will be used. it an outdoor area describe. West Bridge Park, 107 River Street Date organized Tax exempt number I-19_7'A _ _I iSl-ols���(3 City State Zip Code Monticello I'Mlnnesota 55362 Business phone Home phone i 7Lii Sl Type of organization X. Club Charitable n Religious Other non-profit City State Zip Code Minnesota Ie:� •s State Zip Code {{City C.2 1 �v I Minnesota IS52�� City State Zip Code Minnesota City State Zip Code E W,,+1C r? f `Minnesota If the applicant wili contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. NA If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Self insured through the Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis, Administrated by Catholic Mutual Relief Society of American, Liquor Liability of $500,000 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUSF BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amount Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E-mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE; Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATIONeDSTATE.MN.US City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 21. Consideration of authorizing a payment to the Coalition of Utilitv Cities (CUC) for Monticello's share of the 2024-2025 membership dues in the amount of $42,287 Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Finance Director Reviewed by: N/A ACTION REQUESTED 7/22/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to authorize payment of 2024-25 membership dues to the Coalition of Utility Cities in the amount of $42,287. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Coalition of Utility Cities (CUC) is comprised of communities that host nuclear and coal powered electric generation facilities in Minnesota. By combining resources, the host communities maintain a coordinated, unified voice at the State Legislature on issues of common concern. The 2024-25 dues amounts were discussed at the annual meeting on June 24, 2024. Because the CUC's cash balance exceeded the higher of the preceding two years' maximum annual budget, the rebate policy allows for a $69,717 rebate to member cities. $17,138 of this rebate is allocated to Monticello. However, the Minnesota Department of Revenue (MnDOR) is currently in the process of examining the methodology for taxing utility property, and the CUC is aware of the potential for considerable related expenses. Therefore, the organization voted to maintain the same membership dues as last year. A portion of the allocation of total dues to each city is based on each community's electric generating plant's estimated market value, Monticello's share of the due decreased $732 from the 2023-2024 fiscal year. With additional rounds of Community Energy Transition (CET) grant funding, MnDOR's utility taxation study, and the continued collaboration between the State's Energy Transition Office (ETO) and the CUC communities, the group seeks to build on recent successes with additional efforts to benefit host communities. Budget Impact: $42,287 from the administration department in the General Fund. II. Staff Impact: Periodic, scheduled meetings occur approximately three times per year, attended by the City Administrator and/or her designee. Additional meetings are scheduled as needed to update the group on legislative action or other information. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: Woven throughout the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan are references to the vital economic impact of Xcel Energy's Monticello Nuclear Power Generating Plant. The Plan acknowledges the ongoing importance of strategically planning for its future in Monticello, both during and after its licensed used. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends authorizing a payment to the Coalition of Utility Cities for Monticello's share of the 2024-25 membership dues in the amount of $42,287. SUPPORTING DATA • Coalition of Utility Cities Invoice t'�jo City of RED4G BILL TO CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST #1 MONTICELLO, MN 55362 DATE 6/26/2024 RECEIVED IDESCRIPTION I QUANTITY I EFFECTIVE RATE I AMOUNT I DISCOUNT PREVIOUS OUTSTANDING BALANCE CUC DUES - COALITION OF UTILITY CITIES 2024-2025 DUES: COALITION OF UTILITY 1.00 42,287.00 42,287.00 0.00 CITIES -DUES INVOICE TOTAL: 42,287.00 0.00 PLEASE DETACH BOTTOM PORTION & REMIT WITH YOUR PAYMENT For questions please contact us at (651) 385-3600 Customer Name: CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATOR Customer No: 012498 Account No: 0000999 - AR ACCOUNT Please remit payment by the due date to: City of Red Wing 315 West 4th Street Red Wing, MN 55066 INVOICE NO 0139843 DUE DATE 7/26/2024 CREDIT BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 DUE DATE INVOICE NO 7/26/2024 II I I III IIIII III IIIII III I IIIII II II IIII IIIII 0139843 III I II IIIII IIII IIIII IIIII II (III Invoice Total: 42,287.00 Discounts: 0.00 Credit Applied: 0.00 Ending Balance: 42,287.00 INVOICE BALANCE: $42,287.00 AMOUNT PAID: 42,287.00 42,287.00 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2J. Consideration of a Request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Rezoning to Planned Unit Development for a Phased Industrial Development including Industrial Service and Industrial Self -Storage as Principal Uses in the 1-2, Heavv Industrial District. Applicant: Tim Flander/Big Bear Holdings, LLC Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Stephen Grittman, Grittman Consulting, 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item City Planner Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City Administrator Assistant City Engineer, Chief Building Official ACTION REQUESTED Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Development Stage PUD. Planning Commission also recommended approval of rezoning to establish the Mastercraft PUD District. The ordinance for rezoning will be considered by the City Council with the Final Stage PUD. Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-67 approving a Development Stage PUD for Mastercraft, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z and based on findings in said resolution. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 3, Oakwood Ind. Park 3rd Addn. PID #: 155-249-001010 Planning Case Number: 2024-19 Request(s): 1. Development Stage PUD 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Rezoning to Mastercraft PUD District Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation Zoning Designation: Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: August 9, 2024 (60-day deadline) October 8, 2024 (120-day deadline) G-1, General Industrial 1-2, Heavy Industrial N/A City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 Current Site Uses: Vacant Industrial Surrounding Land Uses: North: 1-2 Industrial East: 1-1, Industrial South: 1-2 Industrial West: 1-2 Industrial Project Description: The applicant proposes to construct and operate an Industrial Services business (primarily landscaping and other seasonal maintenance), including outdoor storage of certain equipment and materials. The subject parcel is just under 1.5 acres in area, with approximately 175 feet of frontage on Fallon Avenue. Surrounding uses are industrial in nature, and the applicant seeks to modify the general standards of the 1-2 district to accommodate outdoor storage areas and equipment staging that rely on unpaved surface, substituting crushed concrete for surfaces in the storage area. The applicant seeks the following other elements of flexibility. The first is modified building materials standards to accommodate a ribbed metal panel siding (rather than a coated wall panel designed to look like masonry finish). The second is a flexible way to address their proposed outdoor storage coverage area, based on their business model which includes outdoor parking of drivable equipment, and a longer -term expansion plan that would reduce the building -to -storage area ratio. ANALYSIS The applicant proposed a concept of this project at a joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop in January of this year. Comments from Council, Commission, and staff were generally positive regarding the proposed land use and consistency with both Comprehensive Plan goals for the site, as well as the development expectations for the property in question. The primary issue for the workshop officials related to assurance that the current building materials requirements be met, particularly where the side is visible from the adjoining roadway. The workshop comments expressed a willingness to accommodate the storage area and surfacing requests, and especially in consideration of a long-term opportunity to shift storage indoors to as building development expands on the site. It is acknowledged that there is no guarantee or timeline for that expansion. Development Stage PUD/Rezoning to PUD District Site Planning. The site plan relies on a single access drive from Fallon Avenue. The driveway enters the site and serves parking on either side of the drive. This portion of the more "public" facing parking area would be paved and curbed per code. The driveway would then extend westward to the rear line of the building, after which the surface would transition to the City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 crushed concrete requested by the applicant. It is noted that the site plan illustrates curbing on only the north side of the access and parking area, additional curbing is required as recommended in the City Engineer's letter. The plans illustrate a combination of uses in the rear yard area. There is a stormwater pond along the north property line, and another stormwater basin at the rear of the parcel. For the first phase of the project, in the northwest corner of the site, the applicant's plans propose a stockpile location. In further discussions, the applicant stated that they do not intend to maintain a stockpile use as a part of the current plan. Future accommodation of any exterior stockpile uses would require compliance with the City's outdoor storage requirements, including for screening, containment and cover. The central portion of the rear yard area is also crushed concrete and is shown on the applicant's plans as circulation area that divides two more aspects of storage — one for general materials and equipment storage, and the other for truck and trailer storage/parking. The I-2 zoning district requires that outdoor storage space cover an area no greater in extent than the floor area of the principal building. The applicant's plans result in storage area that is up to 2.5 times the floor area of the proposed 7,200 square foot building, although accommodating and including some circulation areas within this overall square footage. This area of outdoor storage is expected to decrease over time, with the site plan illustrating additional building expansion over both the vehicle/storage area to the west, as well as in the northwest corner of the site. Further, it is noted that at least a portion of the space will be used for truck and equipment parking, rather than materials or general storage. The PUD request is designed to accommodate the future expansion with the second building and the use of the designation area of the site for operations -related parking and circulation. Upon construction of the second building, it is expected that the exterior storage -area surfacing remaining will be upgraded to pavement capable of enduring the equipment used by the applicant on the site. Further, in the review of the phasing plan, it was noted that the site plan does not illustrate existing easements. The applicant is required to supply an updated site plan illustrating easements and adjusting future phase improvement to eliminate potential conflicts with these easements as recommended by the City Engineer. Pedestrian Access. In most cases, the City requires applicants to install public pedestrian facilities (sidewalk or pathway) as a component of completing the street along the parcel frontage. In this case, staff did not recommended that addition, given the anticipated reconstruction of Fallon Avenue in the foreseeable future. Parking. The site plan shows a total of 19 parking spaces along the north side of the building and drive aisle. As an industrial use of 7,200 square feet (or double that with expansion), site parking would only be required to total 9 spaces for each of the two main buildings. However, it City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 is noted that the parking design on the site plan would result in several of the proposed spaces blocking access to overhead doors located along the north wall. For the overhead doors to be accessible, at least half of the proposed parking spaces would not be available, reducing the practical available parking supply to about 12 spaces on the property. As the current building requirement would be just 9 spaces, the current plan can proceed as proposed. The second phase expansion may require additional review if additional parking is needed. The applicant is required to provide a site plan demonstrating the location for the additional stalls at the time of the second phase. Landscape. The landscape plan consists of a series of 10-foot Black Hills Spruce along the north property line, inside of a proposed boundary fence. The trees will eventually create a reasonable buffer, although land uses to the north are also heavy industrial. The plan also includes a shrub foundation planting in front of the building, and an ornamental crabapple tree. Otherwise, the ground surface is required to be planted with turf. The landscape plan exceeds the City's planting requirements for tree quantities and shrub plantings for the site and building. The City Engineer noted the presence of a drainage easement along the northern edge of the property. The applicant will need to revise their landscaping plan to relocate the fence line away from the swale and landscaping away from the fence line sufficient distance. Building Design/Materials. Building materials for the structure are the primary departure from the concept meeting comments. The applicant continues to express a desire to utilize the ribbed -steel siding. On the front elevation, the applicant proposed a wainscot of cultured stone. Per code, and per prior concept discussion, the primary building material should be masonry on all sides, or a textured product to simulate masonry exterior materials. While the applicant relied on other prior buildings constructed in the general area as examples, the City's revised materials code prohibits the exposed ribbed steel. Most recent permit approvals have relied on the updated code standards. While this could potentially be altered by PUD, staff does not recommend that flexibility. In regard to the proposed additional building to be constructed in the second phase, it is expected that this building will be accessory to the principal building. It is recommended that any side visible to the public right of way meet a similar materials standard. The plan shows both current and future phases for building expansion. The proposed future phases as shown are included with this original review. Future phases would be expected to be reviewed at an administrative level if proposed in accordance with the current plans. Modifications or departures from the site plans approved with the current PUD would require a more extensive PUD amendment review. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 Signage. No information was provided related to signage. Sign permitting will be subject to the applicable ordinance requirements. Lighting. The applicant provided a lighting plan submission. The plan appears to rely on wall - mounted lighting which if directed downward is expected to be consistent with the City's requirements of zero footcandles at the property line. An updated plan should be provided to accompany the building permit application. Budget Impact: The applicant submitted the required fees and escrows associated with the review and public notice for the applications. The escrow will be used to cover the review costs of consulting staff. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff involved with the review of the application include members of Development Services and the consulting City Planner. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The proposed use would develop a currently underutilized vacant parcel within the community. The Monticello 2040 Plan cites a goal of "A stable and expanding tax base that diversifies the city's economy and creates sustainable employment." Though the initial site development plan does not meet all current City zoning requirements, the use is consistent with the City's land use guidance and the long-term plan for site development proposes a more robust use of the property. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and held a public hearing on the item during its regular meeting on July 2, 2024. During their discussion, the Commission requested verification on whether native landscaping would be allowed in lieu of the turf grass condition of approval. Staff indicated that if native landscaping is proposed as an alternative to turf, a plan will be required to verify code compliance. Commission referred to the elevations proposed; staff confirmed that the applicant's request is to approve the building materials as shown. During the public hearing, applicant Tim Flander addressed the Commission and made himself available to the Commission for questions. Commission inquired about the request for metal building materials. Mr. Flander noted that it is a common material used in the district. Commission inquired whether the lower 3' of the facade is masonry. Mr. Flander confirmed. He also confirmed that it is a single -story building with 16' walls. The Commission inquired about traffic to the site. The applicant explained that 5-8 employee vehicles are leaving in morning and returning in the evening. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 Commission inquired as to the impact on the requirement for compliant building materials on the front fagade. Joe Elam, the applicant's representative addressed the Commission. Mr. Elam indicated that the applicant is proposing the textured steel on all four sides. Hearing no other comment, the Commission closed the public hearing. Commission noted the two primary issues are the building materials and the proposed amount of outdoor storage. The Commission noted that the proposal presented for both seems consistent with the surrounding area and therefore supportable. The Commission also expressed support for the site plan given the potential future building expansion. Following discussion, the Commission recommended approval of the PUD decisions, amending the building materials condition to accept the applicant's proposed materials. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the Development Stage PUD with the requirements and conditions of Exhibit Z. The use is consistent with land use and zoning for the subject parcel. With changes per conditions in Exhibit Z, staff believes that PUD flexibility could be appropriate, particularly given the planned future expansion on the site. Staff further recommends approval of the rezoning to PUD, which will be considered by Council with the Final Stage PUD application. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2024-67, Development Stage PUD B. Draft Ordinance C. Resolution PC-2024-27, Development Stage PUD D. Resolution PC-2024-28, Rezoning to PUD E. Aerial Site Image F. Applicant Narrative G. Civil Plans, Including: a. Site Plan b. Grading Plan c. Utility Plan d. Erosion Control Plan e. SWPPP f. Firetruck Turning Exhibit g. Uetail H. Outdoor Storage Area Exhibit I. Building Elevations J. Landscaping Plan and Turning Exhibit K. Photometric Plan City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 L. Stormwater Report M. Concept Stage Review Minutes N. Chief Building Official's Letter, dated June 20, 2024 0. City Engineer's Letter, dated June 24, 2024 Z. Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval As Approved by the Planning Commission Mastercraft Planned Unit Development Including Future Expansion Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition An updated site plan illustrating easements and adjusting first phase fenceline and landscaping, and future phase improvements is provided to eliminate potential conflicts with these easements as recommended by the City Engineer. Accept the building materials proposed by the applicant to ensure that all four sides of the building are covered with materials that are composed of textured architectural steel. Ma dify the building terials to enst o Shut th2 building fAc-A dog o,a With mo`orial® that mE?o++he Gity' n+� fAF r _like ., ,-,Haas .heir. the Fobbed rhA_�Afp .,n the ids. Condition modified by the Planning Commission. For the proposed future accessory building, any side visible to the public right of way shall meet the City's requirements for masonry or masonry -like materials consistent with the principal building. 4. Any future plans for stockpile material will require further review for compliance with the City's outdoor storage requirements and avoid erosion or other movements into the stormwater swales and basins. Specify in the Ordinance and Development Agreement that upon construction of the second building, exterior storage -area surfacing will be upgraded to pavement capable of enduring the equipment used by the applicant on the site. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 6. If developed in accordance with the layout and details of the current plan, the future phases may be reviewed and permitted with administrative approvals only. References to the stockpile location should be removed from the plans. 7. No repair work is to be conducted outdoors. 8. Any tenants of the building shall be subject to the same limitations and conditions as to use and maintenance of the storage area and other outdoor restrictions. 9. A revised parking plan for the second phase is provided at the time of development, demonstrating adequate usable, and accessible parking spaces are provided to the site for the second phase. 10. Turfgrass is established in all outdoor areas of the site not designated for pavement or storage/circulation space, or otherwise shown on the landscape plan. 11. Lighting plans are updated for the current site and provided at the time of building permit application. 12. Verify that the presented site plan utilizes a current certificate of survey. 13. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff letter dated June 24, 2024. 14. Compliance with the terms of the City Building Official's letter dated June 20, 2024. 15. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-67 APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE MASTERCRAFT PUD DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Development Stage Planned Unit Development approval, among other concurrent applications, for a parcel of currently undeveloped land; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD would incorporate development opportunity for industrial service uses and directly associated accessory uses as allowed uses in the proposed Mastercraft Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the PUD provides for an industrial service business, on a single development parcel, and utilizes existing right of way for access to and from the PUD business(es); and WHEREAS, the PUD incorporates a series of development standards that the applicant will meet with the submitted, or supplemental, plans and documents; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Heavy Industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PUD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2nd, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the Planning Commission resolution recommending approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the Development Stage PUD Permit; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-67 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed development accommodates additional public and private improvements, including pedestrian facilities, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed development accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details, as supplemented in further submissions, meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 7. The proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the development will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Monticello City Council approves the proposed Development Stage PUD for Mastercraft, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. An updated site plan illustrating easements and adjusting first phase fenceline and landscaping, and future phase improvements is provided to eliminate potential conflicts with these easements as recommended by the City Engineer. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-67 2. Accept the building materials proposed by the applicant to ensure that all four sides of the building are covered with materials that are composed of textured architectural steel. 3. For the proposed future accessory building, any side visible to the public right of way shall meet the City's requirements for masonry or masonry -like materials consistent with the principal building. 4. Any future plans for stockpile material will require further review for compliance with the City's outdoor storage requirements and avoid erosion or other movements into the stormwater swales and basins. 5. Specify in the Ordinance and Development Agreement that upon construction of the second building, exterior storage -area surfacing will be upgraded to pavement capable of enduring the equipment used by the applicant on the site. 6. If developed in accordance with the layout and details of the current plan, the future phases may be reviewed and permitted with administrative approvals only. References to the stockpile location should be removed from the plans. 7. No repair work is to be conducted outdoors. 8. Any tenants of the building shall be subject to the same limitations and conditions as to use and maintenance of the storage area and other outdoor restrictions. 9. A revised parking plan for the second phase is provided at the time of development, demonstrating adequate usable, and accessible parking spaces are provided to the site for the second phase. 10. Turfgrass is established in all outdoor areas of the site not designated for pavement or storage/circulation space, or otherwise shown on the landscape plan. 11. Lighting plans are updated for the current site and provided at the time of building permit application. 12. Verify that the presented site plan utilizes a current certificate of survey. 13. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff letter dated June 24, 2024. 14. Compliance with the terms of the City Building Official's letter dated June 20, 2024. 15. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-67 ADOPTED this 22nd day of July, 2024 by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL in ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE XV, § 153.047 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ESTABLISHING THE MASTERCRAFT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO MASTERCRAFT PUD: Lot 1, Block 3, Oakwood Ind. Park 3rd Addition THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section § 153.047, PUD Districts, is hereby amended to add the following: (y) Mastercraft PUD District (1) Purpose. The purpose of the Mastercraft PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the Planned Unit Development District for industrial land uses. (2) Phased Development. The Mastercraft PUD District will be developed in multiple phases as detailed on the approved Final Stage PUD Plans. (3) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Mastercraft PUD District shall be industrial uses of the 1-2, Heavy Industrial District, including industrial services, as defined in the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, along with administrative offices, subject to the approved Final Stage PUD Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , and subject to the conditions of approval imposed by City Council Resolution No. , and as may be further amended. Leased tenant spaces in any approved building shall be required to be a permitted use in the 1-2 Zoning District. Each individual use is limited to the location and building identified on the Final PUD Development Plans. The introduction of any other use or change in density shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, 153.028(0)(9)(b) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD. (4) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses in the Mastercraft PUD District shall consist solely of those used as illustrated on the Final PUD Development Plan, include accessory passenger vehicle parking, equipment storage and parking accessory to a principal use located within a principal building as ORDINANCE NO. shown on the final site plan. No other accessory uses shall be permitted in the Mastercraft PUD District. Any principal use or tenant use of the principal building shall, if operating any approved accessory use under the Final PUD Development Plans, shall adhere to and be subject to all requirements and regulations of this ordinance and of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. (5) District performance standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Mastercraft PUD District shall adhere to the approved Final Stage PUD plans and development agreement. (5) The specific flexibility and conditions of the Mastercraft PUD District shall be as follows A. Outdoor storage areas shall be as shown per the approved Final Stage Plans for the first and future phases. Upon construction of the second building, exterior storage -area surfacing will be upgraded to pavement capable of enduring the equipment used by the applicant on the site. B. If developed in accordance with the layout and details of the current plan, the future phases may be reviewed and permitted with administrative approvals only. References to the stockpile location should be removed from the plans. C. No repair work is to be conducted outdoors. D. Any tenants of the building shall be subject to the same limitations and conditions as to use and maintenance of the storage area and other outdoor restrictions. E. A revised parking plan for the second phase is provided at the time of development, demonstrating adequate usable, and accessible parking spaces are provided to the site for the second phase. F. Parking for the facility shall be as provided per the approved plans and located on the parcel to be shared among principal building occupants. G. Building architectural plans for the subject property shall be as provided with the final stage plans. H. Signage and landscaping shall be as per approved Final Stage PUD Development Plans, or as administratively approved per Monticello City Code. N ORDINANCE NO. (6) In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the Final Stage PUD, then the applicant shall seek a PUD Amendment per the processes of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and as directed by the Community Development Department. (7) Where there are any conflicts in the allowed uses or required performance standards between the Mastercraft PUD District and any other applicable zoning regulations, the requirements of the Mastercraft PUD District and its associated plans shall prevail. (8) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of § 153.028(0)(10). The city may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this day of 2024. ATTEST: Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor 3 ORDINANCE NO. Rachael Leonard, City Administrator AYES: NAYS: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-28 RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT TO SECTION 153.047 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CREATING THE MASTERCRAFT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AND REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO MASTERCRAFT PUD DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Planned Unit Development for an industrial project, consisting of industrial service uses, for the Mastercraft PUD District; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD District would create the uses and standards applicable to all development in the Mastercraft District, to consist of an industrial services business and tenant occupants allowed as permitted uses in the 1-2 District as allowed uses in the proposed Mastercraft Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD plans account for public easements and rights of way, and adequate drainage and utilities which will serve various phases of the PUD; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels will be consistent with requirements of the City's 1-2 Zoning Ordinance requirements under the adopted Mastercraft PUD District standards, as well as other applicable standards of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Heavy Industrial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2nd , 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and 2. Accept the building materials proposed by the applicant to ensure that all four sides of the building are covered with materials that are composed of textured architectural steel. 3. For the proposed future accessory building, any side visible to the public right of way shall meet the City's requirements for masonry or masonry -like materials consistent with the principal building. 4. Any future plans for stockpile material will require further review for compliance with the City's outdoor storage requirements and avoid erosion or other movements into the stormwater swales and basins. 5. Specify in the Ordinance and Development Agreement that upon construction of the second building, exterior storage -area surfacing will be upgraded to pavement capable of enduring the equipment used by the applicant on the site. 6. If developed in accordance with the layout and details of the current plan, the future phases may be reviewed and permitted with administrative approvals only. References to the stockpile location should be removed from the plans. 7. No repair work is to be conducted outdoors. 8. Any tenants of the building shall be subject to the same limitations and conditions as to use and maintenance of the storage area and other outdoor restrictions. 9. A revised parking plan for the second phase is provided at the time of development, demonstrating adequate usable, and accessible parking spaces are provided to the site for the second phase. 10. Turfgrass is established in all outdoor areas of the site not designated for pavement or storage/circulation space, or otherwise shown on the landscape plan. 11. Lighting plans are updated for the current site and provided at the time of building permit application. 12. Verify that the presented site plan utilizes a current certificate of survey. 13. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff letter dated June 24, 2024. 14. Compliance with the terms of the City Building Official's letter dated June 20, 2024. 15. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By Andrew Tapper, Vice -Chair ATTEST: 4 LAngela Schumann, munity Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-27 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE MASTERCRAFT PUD DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Development Stage Planned Unit Development approval, among other concurrent applications, for a parcel of currently undeveloped land; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD would incorporate development opportunity for industrial service uses and directly associated accessory uses as allowed uses in the proposed Mastercraft Planned Unit Development zoning district; and WHEREAS, the PUD provides for an industrial service business, on a single development parcel, and utilizes existing right of way for access to and from the PUD business(es); and WHEREAS, the PUD incorporates a series of development standards that the applicant will meet with the submitted, or supplemental, plans and documents; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Heavy Industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PUD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2nd, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed development accommodates additional public and private improvements, including pedestrian facilities, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed development accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details, as supplemented in further submissions, meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 7. The proposed PUD is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the development will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the proposed Development Stage PUD for Mastercraft be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. An updated site plan illustrating easements and adjusting first phase fenceline and landscaping, and future phase improvements is provided to eliminate potential conflicts with these easements as recommended by the City Engineer. 2. Accept the building materials proposed by the applicant to ensure that all four sides of the building are covered with materials that are composed of textured architectural steel. 3. For the proposed future accessory building, any side visible to the public right of way shall meet the City's requirements for masonry or masonry -like materials consistent with the principal building. 4. Any future plans for stockpile material will require further review for compliance with the City's outdoor storage requirements and avoid erosion or other movements into the stormwater swales and basins. 5. Specify in the Ordinance and Development Agreement that upon construction of the second building, exterior storage -area surfacing will be upgraded to pavement capable of enduring the equipment used by the applicant on the site. 6. If developed in accordance with the layout and details of the current plan, the future phases may be reviewed and permitted with administrative approvals only. References to the stockpile location should be removed from the plans. 7. No repair work is to be conducted outdoors. 8. Any tenants of the building shall be subject to the same limitations and conditions as to use and maintenance of the storage area and other outdoor restrictions. 9. A revised parking plan for the second phase is provided at the time of development, demonstrating adequate usable, and accessible parking spaces are provided to the site for the second phase. 10. Turfgrass is established in all outdoor areas of the site not designated for pavement or storage/circulation space, or otherwise shown on the landscape plan. 11. Lighting plans are updated for the current site and provided at the time of building permit application. 12. Verify that the presented site plan utilizes a current certificate of survey. 13. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff letter dated June 24, 2024. 14. Compliance with the terms of the City Building Official's letter dated June 20, 2024. 15. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: Andrew Tapper, Vice -Chair ATTEST: r A Angela Schuma , C munity Development Director Consideration of a Request of Development Stage PUD Created by: City of Monticello PID: 155-249-001010 Lot 1, Blk 1, Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition June 3rd, 2024 Big Bear Holdings Application Master Craft Grounds Maintenance is a family owned 30 yr old company who heavily services commercial properties in Wright and Sherburne Counties. Over the years Master Craft has grown and is looking for a permanent home to headquarter the business out of. Monticello is centrally located and a great city to continue building the business in with the development of this lot. The overall goal is to establish a 7,200 sq ft industrial building with office and warehouse. Master Craft will occupy the majority of the building, but may have space available to rent as the business fluctuates in size and the amount of equipment. Additional buildings are drawn in that provide a visual for what future expansion may look like. This could be used by Master Craft or as leased space to offer shop / warehouse space to like kind companies who require smaller industrial spaces with an element of outdoor storage. With recent changes to the code we're applying for a planned unit development to allow for some of the previously allowed development standards that effect the exterior materials allowed, the ground cover improved material, and the outdoor storage allowance. The reason for the PUD is the challenges some of the new codes place over an already difficult site to economically develop within an older industrial development. Our goal is to develop one of the most aesthetically pleasing and functional properties in the area. Planned Unit Development Application 1) Exterior architectural standards. Developer requests the use of finished steel for the primary component of the exterior of the building. Similar to the most recent addition to the industrial park with Monticello Plumbing & Heating, 211 Dundas Rd. An image is below. They used a tan colored - finished steel and have an improved more architectural presence along Dundas which includes a cultured stone base along the bottom of the building with an overhanging roof line above the door that matches the roof to add architectural interest. We request the same requirements acknowledging the need for an enhanced fagade that extends five (5) feet from the principal structure with a 15% minimum in class A products, stone / glass / brick etc. We request this as it is the most suitable to match the surrounding buildings, this type of metal has proven itself for durability, and provides a quality appearance with the addition of the stone, glass, and fagade articulation, that pronounces the front of the building and the primary entrance. The steel chosen for this project is an architectural textured steel that increases the aesthetic value of the overall building. 2) Off Street Loading Spaces- Drive Aisle - Outdoor Storage (combined). Both the off street loading spaces, drive aisles, and the outdoor storage have an improved surface of asphalt or concrete. We request that an improved medium of crushed concrete be an allowed surface as the asphalt and concrete are not suitable for the principle use of the property. The primary use is a landscape company that will be loading and unloading via skid loaders and front end loaders. Asphalt does not withstand well the loading and unloading of equipment, the tight turning radius of truck and trailers that the narrow site demands, and the loading and unloading of materials while using a machine such as a skid loader or a yard loader. Class 5 and more recently recycled asphalt has been used through out the Monticello industrial park for years and has worked well for its users. It provides a compacted base that functions well that allows the turning and loading to take place both for trucks and trailers as well as machines without damage to any of the surface or to unnecessary wear on the tires or tracks of the machines. The improved medium for this project proposed is crushed concrete. The material will be delivered from a specific provider as they have material that does not contain the fines from the crushing and is therefore a low dust producing product. The immediate neighbor to the South, Norland Truck has nearly an acre of outdoor storage, drive lanes, and loading/unloading areas that is composed of class 5 which has worked very well over the years. Across the street to the east was Dakota Supply Group, now Hoglund Body and equipment, who has 0.6 acres of gravel that allows for the loading/unloading, drive lanes, and outdoor storage. JME two lots away has 10 acres that is primarily gravel. The medium has worked well in reducing unnecessary repairs to the surface and strain on vehicles & machines. We request that the front parking lot and primary drive aisle to the street be paved with asphalt as that is a straight shot to get behind the primary structure without turning. Then from a fenced and gated line at the rear of the building back be crushed concrete. This will fully screen the medium from Fallon Ave and allow the developer to utilize the benefits of this improved medium. Below is an aerial concept with the area to be screened via a fence that would separate the class 5 / recycled asphalt medium from the asphalt and provide full screening from Fallon Ave. IT —F 'CROSH ORNE $4B 4-14 6 � 6 ws- -� / u----- --- pmff�-- 'PROPOSED 6Q'_X 1129 BUILDING 3) Outdoor Storage Allowance: We are looking at a 7,200 sf building in the front. We request a ratio of 2.15 to 1 which would include drive / turn lanes, truck and trailer parking spots, as well as an area for material storage. The building will be used for office, warehousing, and equipment service / shop. The majority of the vehicles with trailers will be parked outside. A crew cab short bed truck with a 14 ft dump trailer is 40 ft long. Allowing some space for movement on all sides of the truck we prefer 12' wide parking spaces. Master Craft Outdoors runs 5 trucks currently with expansion in mind. The additional space would be used for the outdoor storage of materials and drive turn lanes as illustrated. This extra space would allow room for onsite movement without congestion and alleviate any accidents on site caused by loading / unloading or movement from the shop to the yard. The designated truck / trailer parking in pink is 4,032 sf, the drive lanes in yellow is 4,548 sf, and the material storage area is 6,777 sf. The true outdoor storage, `material storage,' allowance is less than the square footage of the building. CIVIL & SURVEY PLANS PREPARED BY: Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING % LAND SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SouTn'q,aven `.,A ♦ �y'� i Kingston French Lake f l 14 AlbsorrCenter SIIver Creek Rasaat Albright Highland Smitt Lake i kowarf+ Lake � M'O'nAoSfk • L Detgoo: MASTERCRAFT OUTDOORS B&B BUILT FALCON AVE NE CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY,, MN JUNE 2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS 1. Medina PROJECT LOCATION Sheet Number C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 Cs C9 REV DATE NO. Sheet List Table Sheet Title Cover Site & Dimension Plan Grading Plan Utility Plan Erosion Control Plan SWPPP Narrative Firetruck Turning Details Details Details DESCRIPTION WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA VICINITY MAP PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ARE QUALITY LEVEL D. QUALITY LEVEL D PROVIDES THE MOST BASIC LEVEL OF INFORMATION. IT INVOLVES COLLECTING DATA FROM EXISTING UTILITY RECORDS. RECORDS MAY INCLUDE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS, DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICES MAPS, EXISTING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DATABASES, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, ETC. N 955 — 954 — NO PARKING, FIRE LANE SIGN 9. 288.4' J r — ``�� - u ❑ Rit Nh C I Lf ci 90 S.Y. OF ROAD SECTION I I REPLACEMENT FOR UTILITY CONNECTION FRONT AWNING SIDEWA_K M 30.0' AL 5.0' j 24.7' cn 0 r r 208.6' 0 N co LEGEND: PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED GRAVEL SURFACING a a a °.A a Q PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT f j CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612 -w- PROPOSED SIGN SITE PLAN NOTES: N �I z O d U U) Lu 0' 20' 40' o SCALE:1 "=20' 1. PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO FACE OF CURB. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO BACK OF CURB. 2. ALL CONCRETE RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS. 6. SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 7. LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED TO RECEIVE A CERTAIN SEED MIX SHALL BE MIXED WITH SEED MIX 25-131. 9. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: PARCEL AREA: • 1.46 ACRES ± EXISTING ZONING: • 1-1 DISTRICT PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACKS: • FRONT: 30' • SIDE: 15' • REAR: 15' SITE DATA EXISTING P1 PROPOSED P2 PROPOSED PAVEMENT AREA 789 SF 24,735 SF 19,429 SF BUILDING AREA 0 SF 7,200 SF 17,040 SF PERVIOUS AREA 63,149 SF 32,003 SF 27,459 SF TOTAL AREA 63,938 SF 63,938 SF 63,938 SF PARKING REQUIREMENTS: • MINIMUM PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS: 20' X 9' (90° PARKING) PARKING STALLS: • OUTDOOR TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED: 19 • TOTAL ADA STALLS PROVIDED: 1 (1 VAN ACCESSIBLE) • TOTAL ADA STALLS REQUIRED: 1 (1 VAN ACCESSIBLE REQUIRED) CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 W Q 0 � O N � O o o m o u o N O i m m m 6i - z z Y O C� z C� Q ZN Ov N cl) rn cn Z CD 0 ch W (/) z 00 N Q W co N W W Y� � ♦ V � Lu mX Q w" �O UzU) zLu LuQ �N cn wwZ 00 �� z ofN V Oci)w0 Dz [L-� MryJ� �> z> �UW OJ W �V �� cn z rC O O 0 O F— U O - •�0 L 1 M O r<w I� 6 FD U co - F 4- 0 U SHEET NO. N O N T i ---- ---------- -- . . . .................. .. . LEGEND: r- va; PROPOSED RIP RAP Ooepo 0 IX980.50 TC NEW TOP -BACK OF CURB ELEVATION I X980.50 FL NEW FLOW LINE OF CURB ELEVATION X980.50 SW NEW SIDEWALK ELEVATION X980.50 TP NEW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION IX980.50 TG NEW TOP OF GRAVEL ELEVATION X980.50 FG NEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION .9SQ\ \ X 980.50 EX EXISTING ELEVATION Q84 PROPOSED CONTOUR i PROPOSED SLOPE E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SMr - IN Rim 954.1 l In 9/8. l � v T - - - TION BASIN 1 -955 100 YEAR HWL: 953.27 - 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP RAP m � - 95� u u I u 952 950.83 EX �-- u u u u351 ` 952 953 954.36_TP EOF=952.80 C54.66 TP 00 a oa p�z - BL I 1 ZBL I ss 953 _ 00 �l Q:iL JBL i. ;�b� y/ W d Rl a :313L _ sz �;�. 953.50 FG �953.50 FG I ^ 954.45 TC 954.50 TC W g54 \ \\ SBL 955.00 FG VC1 8 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP RAP - - 954.45 FL 954.00 FL 955.25 TC 3954.70 FG I I / / - 950.5 - - I - �b� p� apoo I- 954.75 FL \ dam. I 1 :Ao �: _o-954.05 TP \-954.26 TP GRADING GENERAL NOTES: N �I z O i- a U Cn Lu 0' 20' 40' o SCALE:1 "=20' 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEER BEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS WORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND COMMENCING WORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT SILT AND DEBRIS RUN-OFF DURING GRADING OPERATIONS (I.E. SILT FENCE, STRAW BALES, ETC.). 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH GRADING PLAN, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TO REMAIN. MEET EXISTING GRADES ALONG STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, AND DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENTS THAT REMAIN TO THEIR ORIGINAL IF NOT BETTER CONDITION. NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT. 5. TURF ESTABLISHMENT AREAS SHALL RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH AS MEASURED IN PLACE OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL GRADED SLOPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 5:1 SHALL BE HYDROSEEDED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETED, OR MULCHED TO HELP STABILIZE THE SLOPES BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE TOP OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ELEVATION OF FLOW LINE IS 6" BELOW TOP OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT, FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL AS REQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT. 8. IT IS INTENDED THAT EARTHWORK (CUT VS. FILL) BALANCE ON SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AND AMOUNT OF ANTICIPATED GRADE ADJUSTMENT FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF FOUR WEEKDAYS PRIOR TO MAKING ADJUSTMENTS. ALL GRADE ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR WORK ASSOCIATED WITH GRADING ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EARTHWORK OPERATIONS, STORM SEWER PIPING AND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS, CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR ADJUSTING FEATURE LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY, SILT FENCE, ETC. 9. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -SEED OR RE -SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. 10. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE, OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR) 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES, PIPING, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. w Q 0 L>UO o CD0 0 co a o o C7 CDN CD m m 0 LLI z z Y O C� Q W _ � 0 U IL 0� JCS (.l9 �0 ZN O v N cl) rn cn Z CD 0 W � z00 200 Q Q� N W W Y� a.Q U LU � ♦ V 00 X Q W� �O �zU) z�Q N �Lu CN ww ~�'^�zzC~i z� n� ofN O Q 0wz Ci)O LLB �� MryJ� �J� z>> �UW OJ c)- W �V cn z O O 0 O F_ U O L 1 Q 0U ^0 W co W _ F 4- 0 U SHEET NO. C 2 Q J z V N O N T LEGEND: 950.83 EX--_ 953 SBL u13L ��� _ I o I J is O -II ] co L Ln I o w �U r L I FUTURE HATER CONNECTION I � 1 �6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP RAP EOF=953.50,\ e FUTURE SANI. CONNECTION o \ / ` \ N W r � ----- `96' C INFILTRATION BASIN 1 - -955 F-100 YEAR HWL: 953.1 I 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP RAPS 952 - 952 - 1; ;GP• EOF=952.80 I 9K _ 0- ��'� ubL � :, J BL7 SG 17L _717: 52 I cf)p' X BUILDING FUTURE 6 120' j AA 9S6 ] r G FFE=956.00 - u INFILTRATION BASIN 2 100 YEAR HWL: 953.45 ___ .9 SQ\ J/Y Rim 954. / In 918. \ 1\ F \ 4 i r I 1 � II I f / W", �104 FES INV.=952.00 -45° BEND �! -7 L F OF 6"0 C900 WM 69 LF �6" � GV _0' BEND 81 LF OF 8" 0 SDF /I W In v--95/.34 m,tj 181, ,Inv-95L72 / 0"o WM--\ ND� i C900 WMJ RIM=953.84' W INV.=945.90 N PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATER LINE Z O PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER a PROPOSED FITTING U U) PROPOSED WATER SERVICE 0' Lu 20' 40' 0 PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE SCALE:1 "=20' PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE PROPOSED FLARED END SECITON PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN Q PROPOSED GATE VALVE & BOX PROPOSED HYDRANT Lu Oz PROPOSED CLEANOUT PROPOSED RIP RAP o �_ o Q J O ♦- O O O O N UTILITY GENERAL NOTES: m 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL UTILITY L J O Z RELOCATIONS. Z 9 Y � Z 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS Lu CD Lu Q w � 2 WORK AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES 0 0 0 U LL FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND COMMENCING WORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH GRADING PLAN AND EXISTING UTILITIES, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING 0 STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TO REMAIN. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AS EXISTING IN THE FIELD AND AS REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEER BEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. WATER: 5. WATER LINE TO MINIMUM 8.0 FEET DEPTH. rO 6. ALL WATER LINES 4" OR GREATER SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C900 OR GRADE Q_ PE-3408 OR GRADE PE4710 PIPE AND SHALL BE RATED FOR 200 PSI. ALL WATER LINES 0 LESS THAT 4" SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C901 SIDR 7 (HDPE WATER LINE) OR TYPE K COPPER PIPE. I` 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING TWO CONSECUTIVE �0 PASSING BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS FROM THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE. 8. CORPORATION STOP SHALL BE FORD MODEL # FB1001-6-IDR7-NL OR A.Y. MCDONALD MODEL # 74701 B-33. 9. TAPPING SADDLE SHALL BE FORD MODEL # FS323 OR A.Y. MCDONALD # 372. 10. CURB STOP SHALL BE FORD MODEL # B66-666M-IDR7-NL. O ♦ M V rn 11. CURB BOX SHALL BE FORD MODEL # EM2-80-56 OR A.Y. MCDONALD # 5614. Z 00 12. FOR WATER SERVICE LINES #12 AWG SOLID COPPER CLAD STEEL (CCS) WIRE WITH o co Lo� 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) INSULATING JACKET, COLOR BLUE. W Z00 N SEWER: W �N 13. VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING SANITARY LINE AT POINT OF CONNECTION W w YCD WITH NEW SANITARY LINE PRIOR TO INSTALLING ANY NEW UTILITIES. U w~ u 14. ALL CROSSING ELEVATIONS OF NEW UTILITIES & SIZES OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES Q > Yr O u wLLLL ARE BASED ON ASSUMED ELEVATIONS AND SIZES PROVIDED BY THE SURVEY. O O Z J LUN ZEQ N 15. ALL SANITARY SERVICE PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SDR-26 PVC (8") AND SCH-40 LL 00 } w z U)C? U) (4„) Q W> CZ7 UJ I_- N t� E ALL STORM SEWER SHALL BE SDR-26 PVC WHEN LESS THAN 8" IN DIAMETER. ALL RCP z v cp w O E:( STORM SEWER SHALL BE CLASS V PIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL HDPE O Q o � � m� Z-> r`J o.LU STORM SEWER SHALL BE DUAL WALL HIGH PERFORMANCE POLYPROPYLENE PIPE M J AND SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M330. W c� iz 16. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE OVER 18" IN DIAMETER SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 17. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES: 17.1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 17.2. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS: z 17.3. FERNCO, "CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS" OR "LARGE -DIAMETER C WATERSTOPS" c 17.4. PRESS -SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS" OR APPROVED EQUAL. O j. 18. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY CONCRETE PAVEMENT O �' WHICH IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED WATER, SANITARY, STORM SEWER SERVICE INSTALLATION. 0 Q U 19. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE J 1 TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF -SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE Q DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN O J WATER. NO DEWATERING IS EXPECTED FOR THIS SITE DUE TO SANDY SOIL � 113- CONDITIONS. F-- m >_ 20. ALL EXISTING CASTINGS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND STORM STRUCTURES WITHIN L.L Q PROPOSED WORK AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE J REPLACED IN KIND. Am W U U 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR UTILITY INSTALLATION. TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO PAVEMENT REMOVAL AND REMOVED AFTER REPLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT IS COMPLETED. LU C 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM FINAL ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS SHOWN MATCH < ARCHITECTURAL/MEP DRAWINGS. Q 23. ALL MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, STORM SEWER PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, a--+ DRAINTILE, AND OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE U INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER SECTION 609.6.1 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR). SHEET NO. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES, PIPING, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE C3 UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. C EOF=953.50---_, a N O u i . . . . .................. .. . �co a� C BASIN 1 100 YEAR HWL: 953.27 955 INSTALL 439 LF OF TEMP. SILT FENCE — — — -� 6 C.Y. OF CLASS 2 RIP RAP 952-a IF _ LEGEND: I .9SQ\ 1 ' I NSF v SMi. - , Rim 954. l •r� 984 Ell Q E.O.F. 915 INSTALL 15 LF OF SEDIME VTLOG� I - I INS STALL 98 LF OF TEMP. SILT FENCE /U) N �I Z 0 a U U) Lu 0' 20' 40' 0 SCALE:1 "=20' TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT. 20) GRADING LIMITS AND PROPOSED TEMPORARY SILT FENCE FIBER -LOG ROLLS PROPOSED RIP RAP PROPOSED CONTOUR EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER- HIGH FLOW EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE CONSTRUCTION/GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. 2. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S STORM WATER PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 3. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR GRADING OPERATIONS AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE PERMIT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY MEASURABLE RAINSTORM. DAMAGED SILT FENCE OR OTHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR PRACTICES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DEVICES SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. 5. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION. 6. THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND THE MPCA. 7. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE DISTURBANCE OF ANY AREAS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL TRIBUTARY DISTURBED AREAS ARE RESTORED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING SILT FENCE AND BALES, UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT VEGETATION IN SAID AREAS. 9. ALL SOILS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER OFF -SITE AREA SHALL BE REMOVED DAILY. 10. THE SITE SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES FOR THE PROJECT MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION. 11. ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED AND VEGETATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE TO MN/DOT 2575. 12. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITH MN/DOT SEED MIX, MULCHED, FERTILIZED & DISK ANCHORED, PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: STANDARD SEED MIX 25-131: 220 LB/AC. INFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX 33-261: 35 LB/AC. FERTILIZER 22-5-10: 350 LB/AC. MULCH TYPE 3: 2 TONS/AC. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BMP'S SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON PLANS DURING PHASING ON PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH MPCA, CITY INSPECTOR AND DEVELOPER REQUEST. APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES • SILT FENCE: 1,143 LF • BIOLOG: 135+ LF • ROCK CONSTRUCTION: 1 EACH • EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT. 20): 2,350 S.Y. • RIP RAP (CLASS 2) 32 C.Y. w Q 0 L>UO N zp o CD 2 2 0 0 o u o w CDN CD m m W Z Y LL O c� J zN Ov N cl) C) 0 Lo LLo W cl) Z 00 o? N Q N W`S M a Q Z.)w� > m .. w 0 cn w O"Z ZofQ w" IXN ♦^ Q v/ W Lwj•� Z � � of52 Z)zz u)N w� �(o Ocnw0 �J_� M 06 Zi> i5w OJ W �w cn z O O C) O F_ U O - •�0 F_ m L.L Q � O — = 06 A O U co W 0 F_ Lo Q 0 U SHEET NO. C 4 Q J a- J DC z O U z O W STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE: Am[01121ET101►170]VJ/-AlIIs] kq TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT NO. MN R1000001 FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PROJECT NAME: MASTERCRAFT OUTDOORS LOCATION: FALLON AVE NE. LOT NORTH OF 219 DUNDAS RD, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 WRIGHT COUNTY LAT/LONG: 45.292067,-93.786554 DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF PAVING, GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION, AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. PROJECT CONTACTS JESSE BABLER AND THE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP PREPARATION: SWPPP PREPARER: MICHAEL MORDAL-HUEBSCH -BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES TRAINING: ENGINEER AND SWPPP DESIGNER (EXP 2026) ADDRESS: 13076 FIRST STREET BECKER, MN 53308 TELEPHONE: 763-262-8822 EMAIL; MMORDALH@BOGART-PEDERSON,COM OWNER: OWNER CONTACT: JESSE BABLER ADDRESS: 12180 HANCOCK ST, BECKER, MN 55308 TELEPHONE: (763)-325-7363 EMAIL; JESSE@BB-BUILT.COM CONTRACTOR (TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR): BUSINESS NAME OWNER NAME MAILING ADDRESS CITY TELEPHONE EMAIL CONTACT NAME MAILING ADDRESS CITY TELEPHONE EMAIL ESTIMATED DATES OF CONSTRUCTION: START DATE _/ / (TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR) COMPLETION DATE / / (TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR) PERMANENT STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS SEE THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION. CONTACT BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES FOR REPORT. PROPOSED FLOW RATE IS LIMITED THROUGH 2 INFILTRATION BASINS. SOIL GROUP: B DESCRIPTION OF EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITY: EROSION CONTROL CONSISTS OF SILT FENCE PERIMETER CONTROL, TURF ESTABLISHMENT THROUGH SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLACEMENT. CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 1.48 ACRES PRE -CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.02 ACRES POST CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.84 ACRES NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.82 ACRES RECEIVING WATERS: STORM WATER FROM THIS SITE WILL BE DISCHARGED TO THE SURROUNDING LOW LAND TO THE WEST WHICH IS DIRETED TO THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THE PLAN SHEETS OF THIS PLAN SET INDICATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: • THE PROJECT LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. • LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. • LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., BUFFER ZONES, WETLANDS, ETC.). • STEEP SLOPE LOCATIONS. • LOCATIONS OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT. • THE DETAIL SHEETS INDICATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT. • IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF -SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DOWN GRADIENT SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOG INSTALLATIONS ARE TO BE INPLACE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. TOPSOIL IS TO BE WINDROWED ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND PLACED AS SLOPE DRESSING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE GRADING OPERATIONS, AS THE GRADING OPERATIONS PROCEED. TOPSOIL PLACEMENT ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES THOUGH THE WETLANDS AREA IS TO BE SPREAD BY A LOW IMPACT CRAWLER TRACTOR OPERATING UP AND DOWN THE SLOPES SO AS TO PROVIDE TRACK PRINTS PARALLEL WITH THE CONTOURS. INSTALLATION OF MN/DOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES ADJACENT THE WETLANDS AREA. ALL TEMPORARY SOILS STOCKPILES WILL REQUIRE AN EFFECTIVE MEANS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL SUCH AS AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET COVERING OR SILT FENCE INSTALLATION ALONG THE TOE OF SLOPE. ALL COMPLETED SWALES SLOPES AND BOTTOMS NOT DRAINING TOWARDS WETLAND AREAS ARE TO BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION WILL BE REQUIRED IN AREAS WHERE GRADING OPERATIONS ARE SUSPENDED OR CEASED FOR A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS OR GREATER. A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE PROJECT ENTRANCE ON FALLON AVE NE. STREET SWEEPING OF THE PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. a N TIMING OF EROSION CONTROL: SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOGS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION RIPRAP AND FILTER BLANKET SHALL BE PLACED AT THE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE OUTLET PLACEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION WHEREVER CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT OCCUR FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 7 DAYS. STABILIZATION WORK MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN 200 FT OF A PUBLIC WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETING CONSTRUCTION DURING PERIODS OF "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" FOR TIME PERIODS DECLARED BY THE DNR. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DISTURBED AREA UNTIL VEGETATION IN ESTABLISHED. ONCE VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE SILT FENCE AND ANY OTHER TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL THAT IS NOT BIODEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED. STREET SWEEPING TO BE PROVIDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER. THE CITY REQUIRES STREET SWEEPING TO OCCUR WITHIN 8 HOURS OF NOTICE FROM THE CITY. APPLYING MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE STABILIZATION IN ANY PART OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE. BLANKETS OR OTHER APPROVED, BY THE ENGINEER, METHOD SHALL BE USED. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AND SCHEDULING THE WORK OF ALL OPERATIONS, INCLUDING SUBCONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES, SUCH THAT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE FULLY EXECUTED FOR EACH OPERATION AND IN A TIMELY MANNER OVER THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. OPERATORS HAVE DAILY ACCESS TO THE PROJECT SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION UNTIL THE ENTIRE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND N.O.T HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A TRAINED INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON THE PROJECT. THAT INDIVIDUAL IS TO BE IDENTIFIED AT THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND LISTED IN THE MINUTES THEREOF. THE APPOINTED INDIVIDUAL IS TO PERFORM A ROUTINE INSPECTION OF THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. A INSPECTION FORM SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ARE TO BE NOTED ON THE INSPECTION FORM AND CORRECTED BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY. PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED WHEN THEY ARE NO LONGER EFFECTIVE OR WHEN THE SEDIMENT REACHES ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. TRAINING DOCUMENTATION: SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, REVISING, AMENDING, AND INSPECTING (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR) NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OVERSEEING & INSPECTING DATE OF TRAINING NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING CONTENT OF TRAINING TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING BMP INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR) NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OVERSEEING & INSPECTING DATE OF TRAINING NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING CONTENT OF TRAINING TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING POLLUTION PREVENTION FERTILIZERS ARE TO BE APPLIED ONLY IN THE AMOUNTS AS SPECIFIED AND WORKED INTO THE SOIL TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO STORMWATER RUNOFF. ONSITE REFUELING OPERATIONS ARE TO BE CONDUCTED WITH CARE. ANY INADVERTENT SPILLAGE OF FUEL OR CHEMICALS IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP, REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. MAJOR SPILLS ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE MPCA 24 HOUR NOTIFICATION NETWORK AT 800 422 0798. ALL VEHICLES ON -SITE ARE TO BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND SUBJECT TO ROUTINE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EFFORTS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF LEAKAGE AND OR SPILLS. PORTABLE SANITARY WASTE FACILITIES ARE TO BE PROVIDED ONSITE AND EMPTIED ON A BI-WEEKLY BASIS. CONCRETE BATCH TRUCKS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DISCHARGE DRUM AND CHUTE WASHOUT DIRECTLY ON THE GROUND. A PORTABLE WASHOUT RECEPTACLE IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE LOCATION AS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. FINAL STABILIZATION FINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS WHEN 70 PERCENT OF THE PERVIOUS AREA IS COVERED WITH UNIFORM, PERMANENT VEGETATION. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND THE NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT PLAN DESCRIPTION TITLE LOCATION EROSION CONTROL DETAILS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C7-C9 EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONS EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONS C4 24 HOUR MPCA EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 651-649-5451 800-422-0798 ESTIMATED QUANTITIES THE FOLLOWING QUANITITES IS AN ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AT THE START OF THE PROJECT. THIS ESTIMATE IS PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ANY ADDITIONAL AND/OR REPLACEMENT BMP'S QUANTITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY QUANTITIES AT START OF PROJECT: ITEM UNIT ESTIMATED INITIAL QUANTITY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER EA - TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT EA 1 TEMPORARY PUMP SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE EA - TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS LF 135+ TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 1,143 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (3N) SY 2,350 PART 1GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. PREVENTION OF SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, AND STORM AND SANITARY SEWERS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 1.02 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM. MINNESOTA PERMIT NO: MN R100001. 1.03 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. B. DO NOT BEGIN CLEARING, GRADING, OR OTHER WORK INVOLVING DISTURBANCE OF GROUND SURFACE COVER UNTIL APPLICABLE PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED; FURNISH ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED TO OBTAIN APPLICABLE PERMITS. 1. OBTAIN AND PAY FOR PERMITS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. C. TIMING: PUT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IN PLACE PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF SURFACE COVER AND BEFORE PRECIPITATION OCCURS. D. EROSION OFF SITE: PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL AND DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT ON OTHER PROPERTIES CAUSED BY WATER LEAVING THE PROJECT SITE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT. 1. PREVENT TRACKING OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC ROADS OUTSIDE SITE. 2. PREVENT MUD AND SEDIMENT FROM FLOWING ONTO PAVEMENTS. E. SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF SITE: PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF THE PROJECT SITE, INCLUDING RIVERS, STREAMS, LAKES, PONDS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, STORM SEWERS, AND SANITARY SEWERS. 1. IF SEDIMENTATION OCCURS, INSTALL OR CORRECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY AT NO COST TO OWNER; REMOVE DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS; COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. F. MAINTENANCE: MAINTAIN TEMPORARY PREVENTIVE MEASURES UNTIL PERMANENT MEASURES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE: WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE GEOTEXTILE RESISTANT TO COMMON SOIL CHEMICALS, MILDEW, AND INSECTS; NON -BIODEGRADABLE; IN LONGEST LENGTHS POSSIBLE; FABRIC INCLUDING SEAMS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM AVERAGE ROLL LENGTHS: 1. AVERAGE OPENING SIZE: 20 U.S. STD. SIEVE, MAXIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4751. 2. PERMITTIVITY: 0.05 SEC^-1, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4491. 3. ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANCE: RETAINING AT LEAST 70 PERCENT OF TENSILE STRENGTH, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4355/D4355M AFTER 500 HOURS EXPOSURE. 4. TENSILE STRENGTH: 100 LB-F, MINIMUM, IN CROSS -MACHINE DIRECTION; 124 LB-F, MINIMUM, IN MACHINE DIRECTION; WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632. 5. ELONGATION: 15 TO 30 PERCENT, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632. 6. TEAR STRENGTH: 55 LB-F, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4533. 7. COLOR: MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD, WITH EMBEDMENT AND FASTENER LINES PREPRINTED. 8. SILT FENCE POSTS: ONE OF THE FOLLOWING, MINIMUM 5 FEET LONG: a. STEEL U- OR T-SECTION, WITH MINIMUM MASS OF 1.33 LB PER LINEAR FOOT. b. SOFTWOOD, 4 BY 4 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION. c. HARDWOOD, 2 BY 2 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: FILTER LOGS SHALL CONSIST OF TYPE WOOD FIBER BIOROLLS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPEC. 3897. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. SHALL BE SILTSOXX PERIMETER CONTROL BY FILTREXX, INC., OR EQUAL. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. DROP -IN SEDIMENT FILTER UNIT THAT INSERTS INTO THE INLET. 1) SHALL BE FLEXSTORM PURE: PERMANENT INLET FILTER BY ADS, INC., OR EQUAL. (a)PROVIDE CURB OPENING PROTECTION FOR EXISTING INLETS WITH CURB OPENINGS. D. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 1. ROCK SHALL BE CLEAN 1 TO 2 INCH WASHED ROCK. E. TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 1. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 1) SHALL CONSIST OF A UNIFORM WEB OF INTERLOCKING STRAW OR WOOD FIBERS SANDWICHED BETWEEN AN ATTACHED TOP AND BOTTOM LAYER OF NET BACKING. 2) THE NETTING SHALL BE BIODEGRADABLE CONTAINING SUFFICIENT UV STABILIZATION FOR BREAKDOWN TO OCCUR WITHIN A NORMAL GROWING SEASON. 3) STAPLES USED TO ANCHOR THE BLANKETS SHALL BE U-SHAPED, 11 GAUGE OR HEAVIER STEEL WIRE HAVING A SPAN WIDTH OF 1 INCH AND A LENGTH OF 8 INCHES OR MORE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM AFTER BENDING. 4) THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE: (a)GEO-SYNTHETICS, INC., - LANDLOK 52. (b)NORTH AMERICAN GREEN - S150. (c)OR EQUAL. b. BONDED FIBER MATRIX. 1) THE FIBERS SHALL BE COMPOSED OF 100% WOOD OR WOOD BY-PRODUCTS. A MINIMUM OF 25% OF THE FIBERS SHALL AVERAGE 10.16 MM (0.4 INCHES) IN LENGTH AND 50% OR MORE SHALL BE RETAINED ON A CLARK FIBER CLASSIFIER 24 MESH SCREEN. FIBERS SHALL BE COLORED WITH A WATER SOLUBLE, NON -TOXIC DYE, TO AID IN UNIFORM APPLICATION OVER THE SITE. 2) THE BINDER SHALL BE A HYDRO COLLOID BASED (GUAR GUM) WITH ADDED SLOW -RELEASE AND AGRICULTURAL BASED FERTILIZERS. THE BINDER SHALL NOT DISSOLVE OR DISPERSE UPON REWETTING. 3) THE BFM SLURRY SHALL DRY TO FORM A CRUST APPROXIMATELY 3-6 MM (1/8 TO 1/4 INCHES) THICK ADHERING TO THE SOIL SURFACE. 4) THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE MATRIX SHALL BE 12% +/- 3% BY WEIGHT. 5) THE MATRIX SHALL CONSIST OF MATERIALS THAT ARE 100% BIODEGRADABLE AND 100% BENEFICIAL TO PLANT LIFE. 6) THE MATRIX SHALL PROVIDE 100% CONTINUOUS COVERAGE AND SHALL HAVE NO HOLES GREATER THAN 1MM IN SIZE. 7) THE HYDRATED MIXTURE DENSITY SHALL BE APPROXIMATED BY A SLUMP TEST PRIOR TO APPLICATION. 8) THE BFM MULCH: WATER RATIO SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. THE MINIMUM BFM MULCH TO WATER RATIO IS 50LBS BFM MULCH AND 100 GALLONS WATER. THE WATER RATE SHALL VARY BETWEEN 100 GALLONS AND 125 GALLONS PER 50LBS, DEPENDING ON WHICH OF THE PRODUCTS IS USED. 9) THE BONDED FIBER MATRIX MULCH PRODUCTS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE. (a)ECOAEGIS - MANUFACTURED BY CANFOR. (b)SOIL GUARD - MANUFACTURED BY MAT, INC. (c)CONWED 3000 - MANUFACTURED BY CONWED FIBERS, INC. F. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEWN INTO A BAG USING A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE AND HIGH STRENGTH THREAD. a. SEAMS SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE WIDTH STRENGTH OF 60LB/INCH AS PER ASTM D4883 AND MEET OR EXCEED THE FOLLOWING. 1) GRAB TENSILE OF 205 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4632. 2) PUNCTURE OF 110 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4833. 3) FLOW RATE OF 95 GAL/MIN/SF AS PER ASTM D 4491. 4) PERMITTIVITY OF 1.5 SEC-1 AS PER ASTM D 4491. 5) MULLEN BURST STRENGTH OF 350 PSI AS PER ASTM D 3786. 6) AOS% OF 80% US SIEVE AS PER ASTM D 4751. 2. SPOUT LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A 4 INCH DISCHARGE HOSE WITH STRAP TO TIE UNIT CLOSED. 3. SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. a. DIRTBAG. 1) ACF ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2831 CARDWELL ROAD, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23234, 800-448-3636. b. DANDY DEWATERING BAG. 1) DANDY PRODUCTS, INC., P.O. BOX 1980, WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43086, 800-591-2284. c. OR EQUAL. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 PREPARATION A. SCHEDULE WORK SO THAT SOIL SURFACES ARE LEFT EXPOSED FOR THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF TIME. B. THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OPERATOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER PERMIT NO. MN R100001. C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AND SIGN THE NOTICE OF INTENT, OBTAIN THE OWNER'S SIGNATURE, AND SUBMIT TO THE MPCA. 1. PROVIDE A SIGNED COPY TO THE OWNER. 3.03 INSTALLATION A. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 1. THE ROCK AREA SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES DEEP, EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE EGRESS AREA AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 50FT LONG, HOWEVER, LONGER ENTRANCES MAY BE REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY CLEAN THE TIRES. 2. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF MUD FROM THE UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE ROCK. B. TEMPORARY SILT FENCES: 1. STORE AND HANDLE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4873. 2. USE NOMINAL 30 INCH HIGH BARRIERS, MINIMUM 60 INCH LONG POSTS SPACED AT 6 FEET MAXIMUM SPACING. 3. EMBED BOTTOM OF FABRIC IN A TRENCH ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE, WITH 6 INCHES OF FABRIC LAID FLAT ON BOTTOM OF TRENCH FACING UPSLOPE; BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT. 4. MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT. a. STEEL POST = 24 INCHES, MINIMUM. b. WOOD POST = 18 INCHES, MINIMUM. 5. DO NOT SPLICE FABRIC WIDTH; MINIMIZE SPLICES IN FABRIC LENGTH; SPLICE AT POST ONLY, OVERLAPPING AT LEAST 18 INCHES, WITH EXTRA POST. 6. FASTEN FABRIC TO WOOD POSTS USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: a. FOUR NAILS PER POST WITH 3/4 INCH DIAMETER FLAT OR BUTTON HEAD, 1 INCH LONG, AND 14 GAGE, 0.083 INCH SHANK DIAMETER. b. FIVE STAPLES PER POST WITH AT LEAST 17 GAGE, 0.0453 INCH WIRE, 3/4 INCH CROWN WIDTH AND 1/2 INCH LONG LEGS. 7. FASTEN FABRIC TO STEEL POSTS USING WIRE, NYLON CORD, OR INTEGRAL POCKETS. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: 1. PERIMETER CONTROL SHOULD BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO THE BASE OF THE SLOPE OR OTHER DISTURBED AREA. 2. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE PERIMETER CONTROL ON 10 FT CENTERS, USING 2 IN BY 2 IN BY 3 FT WOODEN STAKES. IN THE EVENT STAKING IS NOT POSSIBLE, I.E., WHEN PERIMETER CONTROL IS USED ON PAVEMENT, HEAVY CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL BE USED BEHIND THE PERIMETER CONTROL TO HELP STABILIZE DURING RAIN EVENTS. D. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTERS. 1. DROP -IN SEDIMENT TRAP. a. PLACE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. E. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. F. TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 1. PLACE AT ANY AND ALL FINISH SLOPES THAT ARE STEEPER THAN 10H:1V. 2. SEED AND FERTILIZE PER SPECIFICATION 32 9219 PRIOR TO INSTALLING TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION. 3. BONDED FIBER MATRIX. a. INSTALL THE BFM AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM GUIDELINES. 1) THE BFM SHALL BE APPLIED WITH HYDRAULIC SPRAY EQUIPMENT BY A MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFIED APPLICATOR. 2) APPLICATION SHALL BE DONE AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PROJECTED RAINFALL TO ALLOW THE BFM MULCH ADEQUATE TIME TO DRY. 3) THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN TWO STAGES (ONE-HALF RATE) WITH AMPLE TIME TO DEWATER THE FIRST APPLICATION. 4) THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED FROM AT LEAST TWO ALTERNATE DIRECTIONS, PREFERABLY 90 DEGREES APART, IF POSSIBLE, TO ENSURE ALL SOIL FACES ARE COVERED. 5) THE INSTALLATION RATE OF THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE 3500 LBS PER ACRE, MINIMUM AND 100% COVERAGE. 4. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. a. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 3.04 MAINTENANCE A. INSPECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES WEEKLY, WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE END OF ANY STORM THAT PRODUCES 0.5 INCHES OR MORE RAINFALL AT THE PROJECT SITE, AND DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. B. REPAIR DEFICIENCIES IMMEDIATELY. C. TEMPORARY SILT FENCES: 1. PROMPTLY REPLACE FABRIC THAT DETERIORATES UNLESS NEED FOR FENCE HAS PASSED. 2. REMOVE SILT DEPOSITS THAT EXCEED ONE-THIRD OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. 3. REPAIR FENCES THAT ARE UNDERCUT BY RUNOFF OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED, WHETHER BY RUNOFF OR OTHER CAUSES. D. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT. 1. PERIODIC ADDITION OF ROCK, OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF PAD SHALL BE PROVIDED AS VOIDS BECOME FILLED WITH SOIL. E. TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 1. REPLACE THE UNIT WHEN 1/2 FULL OF SEDIMENT OR WHEN SEDIMENT HAS REDUCED THE FLOW RATE OF THE PUMP DISCHARGE TO AN IMPRACTICAL RATE. F. PLACE SEDIMENT IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS ON SITE; DO NOT REMOVE FROM SITE. 3.05 CLEANUP A. REMOVE TEMPORARY MEASURE AFTER PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. B. WHERE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY MEASURES WOULD LEAVE EXPOSED SOIL, SHAPE SURFACE TO AN ACCEPTABLE GRADE AND FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT GROUND SURFACES. END OF SECTION MISSISSIPPI RI (IMPAIRED WA' SITE LOCATION 1 MILE RADIUS 0.5 MI IMPAIRED WATERS MAP .S = Ito _ [wh Pinewood Elementary s Schaal _ - Z O H D_ U U) W 0 W H Q 0 W O W Z v g g g a o CD N O o o co v O N m m m 0 W Z Z Y O U Z H U W 2 0 J 0 0 0 U IL ZN O U N M rn ♦ ) z v♦ 0 o M W U)Z °° N Q W �(D N W F_ w Y (LLI M0 Q U > w~ �U) co Q W� N� O Z_ZJ �'Q wN N ii a�♦^ wwz U)op �z2E (DZ U)� Q�N v/ 00 "� O Q �J� "I-- MryJ� Z>> OJ iUW �� cNn z I..L O O 4-J 0 O U � J � O m L Q co O coU co U Q 0 U SHEET NO. C5 LEGEND: Pumper Fire Truck i PUMPER FIRE TRUCK TIRE PATH OVERHANG EXTENTS 43.00 7.00 22.00 Aerial Fire Truck Width Track Lock to Lock Time Steering Angle 0' 20' 40' SCALE:1 "=20' feet 8.50 8.50 6.0 33.3 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 z O ry U U) W 0 W H Q 0 W O ry z o N Z CD O (.0 CD W J (D O U = N W 00 m m 0 W z U z Y O z Q W 2 C� J 0 0 0 U 0 li zN O U N M ♦ ) z v 0 O M W U) Z °° N Q N W F— w cM0 Q U > Wti U_U) co Q WLL N� OJ Z�'Q WN �N ii Q Cl) wIZ U) 0? >ZW Z�� EN wZ 0o �� O Q 0J!]� (.0� MryJ� Z>> �UW OJ �� V) z I1 O O ID 0 U � J � O •>� m ILL Q CO coO oU co U LU Q 0 U SHEET NO. C6 z z U D W LL TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT ,NULAR BEDDING AS MN/DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 1007 GRASSY AREA S'WIDE - 4iHICK LESS THAN 5' 0_7 L6" STYROFOAM HI-35 BRAN( PLASTIC FOAM OR APPRC EQUAL CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS SURFACE — 8'x 4' x 4" THICK LESS THAN 6' L 6" 4" STAGGER SHEETS 4' LENGTH WISE AND 2' WIDTH WISE NOTE: INSULATION REQUIRED FOR WATERMAIN WITH LESS THAN 5' COVER IN GRASSY AREAS AND 6' COVER UNDER PAVED SURFACES. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello o Y Title: Insulation Detail Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0 3 —15 2 0 0 4 ) 1 1'- 0" I OR 5' IN BACK OF CURB IF CONCRETE WALK OR BITUMINOUS PATH ARE HYDRAFINDER PRESENT FLAG WATEROUHYDRANT MODEL 67 HYDRANT YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG w TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. zi AFTER BACK -FILL EXISTING OR FUTURE STREET BREAKOFF FLANGE CURB OR GUTTER LINE 1" TO 2" MAXIMUM w _ Q01 ABOVE BURY LINE (FINISHED GRADE) Q FINISHED GRADE a VALVE BOX AS WATERMAIN SPECIFIED T1 " '0 2" I1 L� z W to 2 LAYERS OF0.. > 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 10' POLY (4 mil) TYPICAL 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PITUNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH 1/4 STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR A MINIMUM OF 1 C.Y. OF 11-1/2" CLEAR STONE WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS \ I MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. \1\ OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG MEGALUG GATE VALVE TEE THRUST MEGALUG BLOCKING BLOCKING BEHIND BELOW GATE THRUST HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15"x 15"x 4") VALVE BEHIND TEE 4' GROUND LINE 2' C Standard Plate Library City of Monticello MEGALUG MEGALUG 1 9 WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL. POLY . . - :' , D PLUG TEE AND BEND BEND PLUG NOTES: 1. THRUST BLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1/2' AND OVER. I PIPE SIZE I BEARING AREA 1 6" 4.0 SO FT 1 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE I 8" 6.0 SO FT WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 PSI. I 10" - 12" 12.0 SO FT I 3. THRUST BLOCKS BEARING AREA TO BE POURED 1 16" 20.0 SO FT I AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE USED FOR 12" OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 FT. OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS Title: Title: Typical Hydrant Blocking for Installation Standard Plate Library Watermain Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 Y 03-05 KRevised: 03 —17 2001 Revised: 03 —17 2002 STEEL T-STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK CURB STOP. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF CURB STOP INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) F_ z z OM U �w w2 Q W W'Z W'Z W o a J STREET w J 2 4' - 12' 12' AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED i 11'- 0" 11'- 0" GROUND LINE L2�— e CURB BOX WITH 1'— 1 1/4 STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD 7'- 6" MIN COVER 1" CORP. COCK 1" COPPER 1" COPPER J BRICK 4" X 8" X 2" WATERMAIN BRICK 4" X 8" X 2" CAP CURB STOP WITH BLANK SLUG (TYPICAL) NOTE: ATTACH SHUT OF ROD TO CURB STOP SEE SPEC. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AN[ MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMEN ALL MANHOLES WITH INSIDE DROP SECTION SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CLASS II CIRCULAR REINF LATEST REVISION USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS "CRE-SEAL","RESEAL", OR APPROVED EQUAL PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE MAX. 24" 02 PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION WITH INVERT #5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER I ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" - MAX 12" 0 I a I " y STEPS AT 16" OC � e" — : o :i VARIABLEEF STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE NOTES: 1� MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. (�2 IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24" INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. Title" Typical Water Service Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0 3 —15 2006 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 6" MIN Title: Standard Sanitary Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 3001 EXISTING (OR FINISHED) GRADE PLUGGED END 4' 1 NOTES: 1, RE -USE EXISTING AIR BLEED LINES AND PLUGS 1" CORPORATION STOP ON PROPOSED STUBS. INSTALLATION TO BE MADE AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. FURNISH NEW GASKETS WHERE REQUIRED. 2. NEW LINES WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID FOR 1" COPPER AND 1" CORPORATION STOP. ALL OTHER r, WATERMAIN WORK TO BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 1" COPPER PLUGGED END AIR BLEED DETAIL 4' GROUND LINE—\ 2' VALVE BOX 1/2" RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN THE GATE VALVE AND GATE VALVE ADAPTOR 1/2 CU. YD. GRAVEL STEEL T-STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK VALVE BOX. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF VALVE BOX INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) NOTE: IF GATE VALVE BOXES ARE EXTENDED, THERE SHALL BE A GATE VALVE NUT EXTENSION TO WITHIN 7.5' OF FINISHED GRADE AND ATTACHED TO THE GATE VALVE NUT MIN 7.5 COVER (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 1/4" STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL WATERMAIN J GATE VALVE VALVE BOX INSTALLATION Standard Plate Library City of Monticello WATERMAIN Title: Air Bleed Detail And Valve Box Installation Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:o3-15 2003 STEEL T-STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED \\ GREEN WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND A MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK THE SERVICE STUB TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE DEPTH OF COVER OVER INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT 4" OR 6" PVC 4" FIELD CONDITIONS MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED AND SHALL HAVE CLASS "B" BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER It SEE JOINT DETAIL BELOW MIN DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER R/W PLACE NEARLY HORIZONTAL FOR LOW 12 BASEMENTS AND SHALLOW SEWER AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 6" T TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR LESS NOTES: 5 PVC = POLY -VINYL CHLORIDE SDR 26 DEPTH OF COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS INCLUDING NECESSARY FIELD CONDITIONS BENDS AND SPECIAL FITTINGS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE BID PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4" OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 4" OR 6" PVC 45'BEND E ELEV TO BE SET BY THE / ENGINEER - CONTRACTOR 4" TO VERIFY PRIOR TO BURY MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED AND SHALL HAVE CLASS "B" BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYPICAL) SEE DETAIL BELOW FOR 6" CAULKING BETWEEN MIN DISSIMILAR PIPES TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER ADAPTER TO BE RESILIENT ASTM C425-64 TYPE III OR TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR MORE APPROVED EQUAL FOR DISSIMILAR PIPES CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OQ (TYPICAL) k� PVC WYE — VCP TO PVC FERNCO ENCASED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING VCP SEWER MAIN (INCIDENTAL). CONCRETE ENCASEMENT ,. DETAIL (TYPICAL) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 4' Z _O 0- U W 0 W Q W ()� Z U) O M W N 0 O O N ZN O I _V 1V M ♦^ ` v / z O O \` Cl)LO LO W Z� 2 0? N W 0_ m (V Ww Y cM0 a w� .. OfmQ W H ILLoC W o� O "Z< ZWQ WN IYN W LWLI Z LU U) CO rQ >Z � QZ U)OO �N �w0 ILOAO Z_W�>�M UJ�� JGROUND LINE 2' Typical Service Connection Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 3004 N� Z O 0 4-J C: 0 0 U � J � O ' C0 co O U m � W V J a � °� U C7 J Q LU 0 N O N T / Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA-15 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY Or CA-25 Riprap Bedding Original Geotextile fabric grade HORIZONTAL O (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) SECTION B—B REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION (not to scale) U DIVIDER PLATE 3"R Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates LU 6• 1/2 0 3„R 3 SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT v Original SLOPE sja./FT 1.`:: ::'<r;;> ,:; Geotextile fabric SECTION A —A grade (not to scale) 1 020"MIN 2 7•� I _ NOTES: 6 MAX J Chonnelize runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device w 2 e trapping device Q R�W 80, R iW LINEIZONiAL-,,,"," / 1ti MNDOT SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H ® OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS VARIES 36' OR 44' (FACE TO FACE) VARIES GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0474 CU YDS / LIN FT (B612) 5/8 " FOR 18" TO 27" APRONS 18' OR 22' 18' OR 22' MAY BE TILTED B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 21.1 FT CU. YDS. B612 W 0 3/4 " FOR 30" & LARGER APRONS. DESIGN B618 CONCRETE y DIVIDER PLATE 3"R Z CURB & GUTTER �501 4.00% 6"� 2.00% 2.00% 4.00% 3� / U (n CD A.� S� 6 1 1.,.. 3•R 6' 13 1/2 / i N 6" SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT cfl W / OR �' . / I Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates C) 0 0 ANCHOR TOP 6" TOPSOIL, SEED, J 4 SLOPE 3/4"/FT A I A o N & BOTH ENDS AND MULCH OR SOD Q NOTE: (TYPICAL) 2' - Q TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE �j A �C A B _- A2'MIN o —TACK COAT MNDOT 2357 • Z• Q v E 1. ALL TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER MNDOT SPEC. 3392 & 3394. — Q5 TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE / / v E m LU 2. APPLIES TO FLARED END SECTIONS 12" OR LARGER. Q v v v v v o m m 0 -j O5 CLASS V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) I'2• CD % v v v o Z Z w J O 3. ALL NUTS AND BOLT ATTACHING TRASH GUARD TO THE FLARED HORIZONTAL v o > Y LL 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6" BEHIND CURB) Q LINE � � � 6• / v _ v v . Ij� � > U Z END SECTION SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED , MNDOT / �U '� v o o Q w = j w 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE / - � SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H � � v v o v -� J_ OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 Q / 0 0 0 U 0 LL TYPICAL SECTION GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0582 CU YDS / LIN FT (8618) 1Q 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB. MAY BE TILTED B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 17.2 FT / CU.YDS. (B618) URBAN NON—RESIDENTIAL - CD/ o Q THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR 12 BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS Z / B AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 3/4 " PER FT ~ / 24' min. Q3 STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY 1/2 R X % Slope away from 0 ENGINEER. 1/2 " R 3• 3.' W / highway /` ® 6" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CLAY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY 10• / J SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 7' SEE PLATE 4006 FOR DETAILS. HORIZONTAL I�5 PAVEMENT AND CLASS V SECTIONS WILL BE LINE �� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Match I 50' min. DETERMINED2 L � ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS DEPENDING or Right of Way J I ON TRAFFIC VOLUMES, PROPERTY USE AND SOIL CONDITIONS - 0• I Existing MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Grade PLAN 0 Title: Title: Title: Title: Trash Guard for Typical Street Non -Residential Concrete Curb & Gutter Commercial Gravel O� Standard Plate LibraryStandard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library 0 End Section (Collector) Y Y Construction Entrance City of Monticello City of Monticello Date: _ —Plate Na. � Cit of Monticello for Streets ���� City of Monticello � 3' Date: 03-05 Plate No. 03 05 5003 Y Date: 03-05 Plate No. � y Date: 06-14 Plate No. �0 Revised: 5005 Revised: 6002 Revised: 4007 Revised: 03-15 J 03-17 03-15 / 03-15 ZN 06 (N L'•) DO 00 U) z W C? (V W W ' PNT POINT li rN 0 R . O. W ut > /W � W Y OIi Uc�o B" A" O1 W .. i F 0l PROPOSED UTILITY CURB LINE ^ of W m< � .� 3.3' �.6• 20• UZJ W(V �3.3' ;..3 li O Lu w Z U)� 77 Q W � H °D STAKE 2' —/ 2 , w Cn N 0 0 0 etV C jZZ U)� EXISTING UTILITY / EXISTING UTILITY O m� STRAW OR WOOD FIBER / 0 Z Z J 6" TO 7' DIA. ROLL ENCLOSED IN J 0.7 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 1.15 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 3.75 STAPLES PER SO. YD. /� Q _ m W PLASTIC OR POLYESTER NETTING 4:1SLOPES 3:1SLOPES HIGH FLOW CHANNEL& W i LU H SHORELINE TYPE 2s BIOROLL DITCH CHECK CENTERLINE ROAD USE ON ROUGH GRADED AREAS MILL 1 1/2 BITUMINOUS TO LANE LINE MILL 1 1/2 BITUMINOUS 2 FEET OUTSIDE OR FOG LINE OF EXCAVATION LIMITS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER 1" X 2" X 18" LONG WOODEN STAKES AT 1' 0" SPACING MAXIMUM. STAKES SHALL BE 1� i 2'-5- DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE BIOROLL AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH <��'o THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. DF PROVIDE 8" TO 10" OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH. BIOROLL 3B ® CURB LINE Z 45' FLOW 12' R.O.W O 8" 10" EMBEDMENT DEPTH a"i I 3A I BIT WEAR COURSE O 2357 TACK COAT 2 U FULL DEPTH SAWCUT OF BITUMINOUS BASE 4-1BIOROLL STAKING DETAIL 0 C IS REQUIRED 1' AROUND EXCAVATION EDGE MILL AND OVERLAY 2FT � C BEYOND EDGES OF EXCAVATION J O ' FOR BIT WEAR PLACEMENT 3' r i J_ ENTRENCH A j� y BIT BASE COURSE MINIMUM OF 2' �`1 1' U— 00 \ CLASS 5 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. � /\/� 1 ' TT j ' \\\ /r M O w 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6' (15cm) DEEP X 6" (15cm) WIDE TRENCH ) O U U Q j O�OO� O O1 \�� 1 Q �• �r i WITH APPROXIMATELY 12' (30cm) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THEco BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12' (30cm) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. �ylr� \) /l rP BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" (30cm) 3� 100% STANDARD PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF PROCTOR DENSITY STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE O AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES -LU IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM , STAPLES/STAKES - 95% STANDARD PROCTOR LU SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. DENSITY N❑TEI 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2"-5' (5m-12.5m) OVERLAP DEPENDING L� WHEN MORE THAN 1 ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING _ EXCAVATION AREA (WIDTH VARIES) Q BLANKET INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. DTH. OSHA APPROVED SLOPES TO EXISTING UTILITY BIOROLL/COMPOST LOG IS 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE - - NEEDED, OVERLAP ENDS A 3- (7.5cm) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12-(30cm)APART ACROSS ENTIRE - a- - WII MINIMUM OF 6' AND STAKE NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY U 'IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6' (15CM) MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. T Title: Title: Excavation In City SHEET NO. Bio Log Staking Erosion Control Blanket � y Y Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library y Straw or Wood Bio Roll y Stapling Patterns & Installation Streets 5 Years a Older Cityof Monticello Date: Cityof Monticello Date: City of Monticello Date: — Plate No. Plate No. 03 05 03-08 Plate No.03-08 7006 Revised: 6009 —C_ Revised: 6011 Revised: 03 —17 C8 03-15 �� 03-15 / \ / R7-1 (MODIFIED) 121Nxl8IN WHITE ON BLUE 6)" FINISHED GROUND LINE o o NO PARKING SIGN R7-8M 121Nxl8IN PARKING WHITE ON BLUE VMIME U) REQUIRM TmR7-8bP 121 Nx61 N WHITE ON BLUE 6)" FINISHED GROUND LINE r r SITE ACCESSIBLE SIGN O p 1 1/21N X 1 1/21N 3/81N DIA. BOLT WITH p WASHER & LOCKWASHER p SIGN POST O p FINISHED GROUND LINE NOTE: r 1. ALL POSTS AND ANCHORS SHALL BE /l 12 GAUGE WITH HOLES ON ALL FOUR SIDES 1 3/41Nx 1 3/4IN 2. LEAVE 1 TO 2 HOLES EXPOSED ABOVE ANCHOR FINISHED GROUND LINE FOR CONNECTIONS OF POST TO ANCHOR 3. SIGNS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES TAF SITE SIGNAGE N.T.S. � =111 Gul "I w0N 1:W-1Ra=Eel unt972� I RlI1aaWM� EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF 1.5 IN - BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 21N - BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE \\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ TACK COAT 12 ........................................................... ................................................................ ......................... COMPACTED 6' CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE SUBGRADE SUB GRADE \\%\�\.��� v< BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION N.T.S. EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASE PLACEMENT 121N BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF 1/21N DIA. REINFORCING STEEL —D=10" REINFORCED CONCRETE SPACED AT 181N ON CENTER EACH WAY D/2 = 5" 6" f— r TYP o a a d d f SUBGRADE f. I 12" MIN _ 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE A TYP. CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION - HEAVY DUTY N.T.S. 4 AS n D g d 8" MnDOT 3138 CL. 5 GRAVEL — COMPACTED SUBGRADE GRAVEL SECTION N.T.S. i i f— PROPEX-"SILT STOP" FABRIC 2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKES @ 4' O.C. f-10' MINIMUM — I BACKFILL 4", 77 BURY BOTTOM EXISTING GROUND 6" OF FABRIC ��� � PROPOSED EMBANKMENT TEMPORARY SILT FENCE N.T.S. Z O H d U U) W 0 W Q 0 v 2 2 2 W o N O Q0 W 0 0 0 c O N m m m 0 u.i Z Z Y O U Z Q W 2 J 0 0 0 U 0 IL ZN 0 U N M ♦ ) z v♦ 0 O M W U Z °° N Q WLLI N W F— w Y cM0 a U > W r` U) U_ mX Q WLL Oi�ZJ N� Z�'Q WN �N ii a � w I Z U) op >ZW Z� 04 EN wZ 0o�r- 0a 0J!]� (.0 r— MryJ� Z>> OJ i w �� CURB TAPER DETAIL z r O 0 O U � J � 2411 N— O _ aA .� R=2IN ij 11 � co LL R=2IN a' PER FOOT Q co O co N L d A. d V . . d4. 811 Lu O 1...................a.................. Q AGGREGATE BASE AS PER � U ADJACENT PAVEMENT SECTION INFLOW SHEET NO. C9 J_ Q W 0 N CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 0 N.T.S. ol a �a �I i I I I SM Rim 954. l l In 918. l I ❑T - _ I STANDARD VEHICLE WITH 8'X20' TRAILER 1 INFILTRATION BASIN 1 955 100 YEAR HWL: 953.2 i 0* '• EOF=952.80 3 I o o 00 L_ "$L-----=U� -- SBL cn JtiL GBL �� I►\1L ubl- ki , "SBL Q o• SBL — — — — — \` CC) IT oo a o 0 o 000e ° owe �. I od•�a. 0 8�!cn ou r � I i Imo. LEGEND: � C J ail Ur I STOCKPILE AREA I I •���`• I Q CRUSHED CONC. ° --- - - - - - - - - _ I DRIVE AISLE --------- �� - ----- a ----- -- --�- W m O I 4,548 S.F. _ _ _ _ e` e 1-7 co Ln �L6 I ::.... :. 1 LL W t 1 , t 1. LL EOF-953.50 °� \ :.::....:....:CRUS:H�O:'.CONC:: OO : `.. �.. _-... .F-f!.v-cl.r477'r@/T��/"�C11:./^�" \ I d d �� _---------�` :. .'. 6,77 S.F.. •�' ---'�---� I CRUSH D ONG \` �^ I T 1 I TRUCK & TR�41LE; P�4R : G....:. i W, I Ir PROP OSED 60 X 120 BUILDING W I I 1 FUTURE UiL ING I FFE=956,50 r 1 FFE- b.00 I I 1 I I oil : ..., I - 4jil Q.....,. 0 O .. .. ....'. 1 -SBL CBL \ DL /—EOF=955.00 07 II P F350 CREWCAB 4X4- 9 0 / / IRCP 18" v--95L72 \ I VEHICLE TIRE PATH 0' 20' 40' OVERHANG EXTENTS 111111 SCALE:1 "=20' Z O U u) W w Q 0 zN O I _ V N M O ♦^ v/ z 0 O M W � op Zop N LV N WF— w Y cM0 as U l-- Wk .. � W Co H LL W o� O "Z< ZEQ WN EN W IZ U) 00 co V♦ wUZ WN V Q U)wo ILL LL(D O c) O r— M � - Z>> - O J COP W UW � NN 5z 0 a-J m O 0 U w J � W O to Q ~ coO QO — pm w CC0 G 0 Q °, o U SHEET NO. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: E I GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 N O N 120140 3068 1-140 120140 3068 1-140 120140 3068 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I x e 0 GARAGE 48"X 36" 48"X 36" 48"X 36" @ 168" AFF @ 168" AFF @ 168" AFF 120'-0" 1 D RaK Drafting & Design ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, DUPLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF THIS PLAN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS PROHIBITED 48" X 36" @ 166 AFF 0 N 0 cl ry ,$< Xo a� 48" X 36" @ 166 AFF 3D VIEWS ARE NOT TO SCALE AND MAY NOT REFLECT EXACTLY WHAT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE PROJECT. RENDER VIEWS ARE REPRESENTATIONS OF WHATTHE VIEW COULD LOOK LIKE, NOT WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE 2D VIEWS ALWAYS SUPERCEDE 3D VIEWS �T V Wog oZS L z Ln Y w d� a �w w � � N 91 V � Cif .l_Mn7 0 W N I= 6 LL- w J 1L O a V a Lu Lu cn 0 � 1� 0 r 0. p X� a \ O ki w J_ Z Q O 2 = w .a DRAWN BY: Karl -4ed DATE: 3/25/2024 SCALE: R� x �q& & 3/32" = l'-0" R**** SHEET #: Al Doors/Windows 71 sq ft 5.63% Wood 24 sq ft 2% Stone 171 sq ft 13.57% Steel 1018 sq ft 78.8% Total 1260 sq ft ELEVATION 3/16" = V-O" VIEW OF THE FRONT * !AVWV k ** * m R** 3D VIEWS ARE NOT TO SCALE AND MAY NOT REFLECT EXACTLY WHAT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE PROJECT. RENDER VIEWS ARE REPRESENTATIONS OF WHATTHE VIEW COULD LOOK LIKE, NOT WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE 2D VIEWS ALWAYS SUPERCEDE 3D VIEWS Z vi LL w a VO a LLI O W w W Ll o o f� o a O w z a o � x w DRAWN BY: Karl -460 DATE: 3/25/2024 SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" SHEET #: A2 D RaK Drafting & Design ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, DUPLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF THIS PLAN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS PROHIBITED Steel 1260 sq ft 100% Total 1260 sq Ft ELEVATION 3/16" = V-O" VIEW OF THE BAGK --;Olk , �A�V R + U4 B�U�hLMr0 3D VIEWS ARE NOT TO SCALE AND MAY NOT REFLECT EXACTLY WHAT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE PROJECT. RENDER VIEWS ARE REPRESENTATIONS OF WHATTHE VIEW COULD LOOK LIKE, NOT WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE 2D VIEWS ALWAYS SUPERCEDE 3D VIEWS V Wog p� Ln Z Ln y w � w cn ,V R � ctl l7 0 CO N Mm &i lL- q w z N z J !L O d a Ow 0 W Q 0 0 0 a 0 W z a o 2 x w .a DRAWN BY: K'ri -460 DATE: 3/25/2024 SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" SHEET #: A3 D RaK Drafting & Design ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, DUPLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF THIS PLAN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS PROHIBITED ELEVATION 3/32"=V-0" VIEW OF THE LEFT SIDE E L E VAT I O N 3/32"=V-0" VIEW OF THE RIGHT SIDE D RaK Drafting & Design ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, DUPLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF THIS PLAN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS PROHIBITED 3D VIEWS ARE NOT TO SCALE AND MAY NOT REFLECT EXACTLY WHAT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE Windows 60 sq ft 3.12% RENDER AREJ REPRESENTATIO SS E VIEW OF WHOK Steel 1860 sq ft 96.88% COULD LOOOK LIKE, NOT LIKE, , WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE Total 1920 ft 2D VIEWSE sq SUPERCEDVIEWS 3D VIES Windows/Doors 945 sq ft 49.22% a < o Steel 975 sq ft 50.78% 1 0. p V O a Total 1920 sq ft W m oWO o H 0 a w J_ Z ,cc 0 2 = w .a z O W J F— LU Q L.0 � U1 a W Q N DRAWN BY: Karl 4460 DATE: 3/25/2024 i SCALE: R� x �q& & 3/32" = V-0" R**** SHEET #: 1/1 t� 1 , -- _ y - ' I ----- -^r 0 I-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 1 --------- Outdoor_ Storage Area I , I F R&YRit tB..S.1 IM tFiSRI 'd. 27 Cr Master Craft outdoors 9450 Nason Ct. Ne Otsego, Mn 55330 Salesman: Tim Flander cell 612-490-3553 Landscaping for XXX Fallon Ave Ne Legal Description Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park are Addition Install 20' of edging with Natural mulch outside of front sidewalk. Install 5 Magic Carpet Spirea's in Mulch inside Edging. Install 10 Black Hills Spruce along visible fence line. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0.7 1.5 3.0 4.1 4.3 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.2 4.0 3.1 1.5 0.6 0.� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0.5 2.0 5.7 8.3 7.4 8.9 7.5 8.2 8.5 7.7 9.0 7.2 8.0 6.0 2.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 1.5 0.0 0.D ■ ■ 0.0 0.D 0.0 0.D ■ ■ 0.0 0.D ■ ■ 0.0 0. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 U.0 ■ ■ ■ ■ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 lJ. b 1U 1.18 0.3 0.1 I I I ' 0.03 0.2 0.1 I I I r I 2.4 0.6 0.1 • O li 12 8 1 1 0 .'i-) . , 0 1 3.:L 0.6 0.1 U•U •V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ■ ■ ■ 0..3 0.2 0. 0. 0 U. U U. U U. U 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.- io ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 u.0 0.0 ZRaIf. ("`fjM. i1C i a �E.:twivED. AhD C--.;!Atkij-t,., l fDF i.•» F"N .i. i*-a. T icti FEAw_: !;;; aTEL " w "oo A w ro G N H m A 7 H -H ,C CL a) 3 b+ G U . u G a H m .. H U G -w U" m O k" m U+ O U H A ro +� o m •o EH. 'o b+ o ,C m N m o H a a Ia m N" S4 0) ti a " G c o m ,�., N o m N ro o v aaHi'ro v" m �m sai b+ aEi E ro ro b A C ti� o b o ro ro o m +� .G m a ca w o a)E O N C b v ro v N O 'O 14 'O u o ro .Wc o W W.i r"I a U N •C F NO C N W a)a' m H O N a O E N 'o C N U a N 0 m o A A 'o HO v A N N O C a E o Io ro o as b a o ti v m 'c5 "' -.io b) ro >. J� r4 w o b o, -.Ui -ro U o LL o -.i o f r+ rl W G H U o G a� c4 a GL CL h G "o ro o 0 o H o _HH N H o G o c ro ro w o o -. m et ro H E >r a N N N H N N G G G U i-7 tWv N� W p N y� O N O Ero O a o H o o ai R. N H 0 H N H a ro N b) ,C w rl 3 q HM A� Ga'" ow rnro > a ti A tP N a N H> v N U 4 'O H p '0 7 W .0 v m o N O , p m a m o o w ,G G a EF P, A" E w E GG o w o ro Q 0 x W L) C a) U) a) a) O N N m m z U i W m C U) 0 U_ 0 L 0 x W �o U >' N J Q m C 0 z��' to L i 0 m . 3 m J > ry w L_ 0 LL r*4 O IL 0 Scale: 1 inch= 7 Ft. Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Description PtSpcLr PtSpcTb Meter Type CalcPts 1 Illuminance Fc 2.36 13.7 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings taken at 0'-0" AFG 10 10 Horizontal * * *LAYOUT AND BOM ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Tag Label Arrangement Lum. Lumens Arr. Lum. Lumens LLF Description Lum. Watts Arr. Watts Total Watts Filename 0 5 S SLIM17FAFC60 SINGLE 7035 7035 1.000 SLIM17FAFC60_5K 57.23 57.23 286.15 SLIM 17FAFC60_5K.ies (D 2 D DISK34-6 SINGLE 1088 1088 1.000 DISK34-6-5K 15 15 30 disk34-6-5000k.ies Expanded Luminaire Location Summary LumNo Tag X Y MTG HT Orient Tilt 1 D 141.59 60.13 8 90 0 2 D 141.59 52.72 8 90 0 3 S 78.965 86.7 15 90 0 4 S 102.545 86.7 15 90 0 5 S 126.815 86.7 15 90 0 6 S 54.515 86.7 15 90 0 7 S 30.945 86.7 15 90 0 Total Quantity: 7 NOTES: * The light loss factor (LLF) is a product of many variables, only lamp lumen depreciation (LLD) has been applied to the calculated results unless otherwise noted. The LLD is the result (quotient) of mean lumens / initial lumens per lamp manufacturers' specifications. * Illumination values shown (in footcandles) are the predicted results for planes of calculation either to the plane of calculation. * The calculated results of this lighting simulation represent an anticipated prediction of system performance. Actual measured results may vary from the anticipated performance and are subject to means and methods which are beyond the control of the designer. * Mounting height determination is job site specific, our lighting simulations assume a mounting height (insertion point of the luminaire symbol) to be taken at the top of the symbol for ceiling mounted luminaires and at the bottom of the symbol for all other luminaire mounting configurations. * RAB Lighting Inc. luminaire and product designs are protected under U.S. and International intellectual property laws. horizontal, vertical or inclined as designated in the calculation summary. Meter orientation is normal Patents issued or pending apply. N O C W _N U CO N w 0 LL a� 0 m L a " W rl W H O N G N N m A 7 H- ,c0 a G U b UI G H ro w O %.H W UI .I� O N UI A o 0 O b r C as N WH G a � a- rn �+"� a) .c � o N o" 1U4 tAn ti a" C c o m ,�., a o m N ." H� ro o 3 .G G rn U v aaHi'ro v" m �m sai b+ N ro ro rwU 'A C ti� o G+�roarm+�roa,arno ,,Mow m H H H m N W b' C U +� �. ro o m +� ro ro-" b� G NF! O 1Hi a N b W N C b N ro 'o N O u O .a ro Grnvro°'a�m>.cv -"�roroo+-"roro0 G N O a N 0 [n .Oi a N U 0 W N f0G W > a o U C H m o o A N o N O g a ri o G a rl H T7 �r y a ro o asba otiavi my a >+ N y W o N I y W+ 23 -Ho O o) G G LG G H 3 UJ ro 2 ro +"' A m W .o; 'O G N N ll >r I r4 w o b O� -.Ui -ro U o a b� G H o -1 O E r+ rl W G H N o G G "O W oa -" ro o 0 o H o -H H N H o c o c ro ro W o a^.romromb,w 'ome �ro O a o H o o w rl 3 q H' W Ga-" ow rnro > Co to C4 ,a N .H A G o W .G •O a +' Jr N 'O G .] a U rn v a ro H p v tq W v H p '0 7 W .0 Ul m o > U) O A p N� m� o o a E a A •i E W ^E Z 0 w -o ro It N O N N CO O 1W I L 0 X w M L U L N U) m m N E (B N U- i 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.9 3.4 3.3 3.0 2.5 2.1 2.4 3. 3.9 3.7 C8- 6* I 3.8 3.8 3. 3.8 3.5 3.1 I 3.0 3.6 4.0 4.2 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.3 3.8 3.2 2.7 3.1 3. 4.4 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.1 5. 4.9 4.5 4.0 f 3.7 4 .5 5 . 1 I 5 . 6 76 . 0 76. 3 76. 3 76. 3 76 . 0 I 5 . 6 5 . 0 4 . 1 3 . 3 3 . 9 4 . 9 5 . 6 76. 2 76 .6 76 .7 76. 8 76 . { 76. 5 5 . 9 5 . 1 4.6 5.6 76.6 7.5 8.3 8.8 79.0 8.8 8.4 I 7.6 76.6 5.4 4.3 4.8 76.3 7.4 8.3 79.0 79.4 79.4 79.� 8.7 7.7 76.5 11 5.9 7.4 �9.0 110.5 11.9 12.9 13.2 13.0 12.0 10.6 �9.0 7.2 5.5 �6.2 8.3 10.0 11.6 12.9 13.6 13.7 13I2 12.2 10.8 8.8 7.8 10.0 12.5I 15.0 17.3 18.8 19.3 18.8 17.3I 15.1 12.5 �9.8 7.3 8.2 1112 13.9 16.4 18.5 19.7 19.9 19I1 17.4 15.1 12.0 t 10.0 13.1 16.9 20.5 23.6 25.7 26.3 25.6 23.7 20.8 17.1 13.0 79.5 10.7 14 9 18.7 22.3 25.0 26.6 26.9 25 8 23.6 20.3 16.1 I 12.7 16.7 21.7 26.3 29.9 32.3 33.1 32.2 30.0 26.3 21.9 16.8 1�.3 13.8 19.2 24.1 28.4 31.6 33.5 33.7 32.4 29.6 25.8 20.8 15.7 20.3 26.2 31.5 35.6 38.3 39.2 38.3 35.4 31.0 25.9 20.4 1_.2 17.1 23.4 28.9 33.8 37.6 39.7 39.9 38.4 35.2 30.8 25.2 ' 18.4 23.4 29.6 35.4 40.0 43.0 44.1 42.9 39.6 34.8 29.4 23.3 1-,.5 19.6 26.7 32.6 37.8 42.0 44.3 44.6 42.8 39.3 34.7 28.6 20.3 25.2 31.7 37.6 42.5 (D4 . 45.3 42.0 37.2 31.5 25.1 1E.8 21.0 28.6 34.8 40.2 44.5 &.-9, 4 2 45.2 41.6 36.9 30.6 I 20.6 25.5 32.1 38.1 43.1 4 .2 45.9 42.7 38.0 32.2 25.6 1S.1 21.3 29.0 35.4 40.9 45.1 47.5 47.8 45.9 42.4 37.6 31.2 20.0 24.7 31.2 37.1 42.0 45.2 46.3 45.1 41.9 37.3 31.7 25.2 1E.7 20.8 28.3 34.5 39.9 44.1 46.6 46.9 45.1 41.7 37.1 30.6 19.2 23.6 29.8 35.5 40.2 43.4 44.5 43.5 40.3 35.6 30.3 24.2 1-,.9 19.6 26.8 32.9 38.1 42.2 44.8 45.3 43.5 40.0 35.7 29.4 18.0 22.3 28.4 34.1 38.9 42.1 43.1 42.1 39.0 34.3 28.8 22.9 1E.9 18.4 25.2 31.3 36.7 40.9 43.4 43.9 42.3 38.8 34.2 28.0 I i 16.9 21.3 27.5 33.4 38.6 41.9 43.0 41.9 38.7 33.7 27.9 22.0 1E.2 17.7 24.2 30.3 36.1 40.7 43.3 43.8 42.0 38.3 33.3 27.0 16.8 21.5 27.9 33.9 39.2 42.7 43.9 42.8 39.3 34.1 28.1 22.0 1E.2 17.8 24.4 30.6 36.6 41.4 44.1 44.6 42.6 38.7 33.5 27.0 17.6 22.6 29.2 35.3 40.4 43.9 45.1 44.0 40.5 35.2 29.3 23.0 1-,.0 18.8 25.7 32.1 38.0 42.7 45.4 45.8 43.8 39.9 34.7 28.2 18.7 23.9 30.7 37.0 42.0 45.4 46.7 45.5 41.9 36.8 30.8 24.4 1E.2 20.2 27.5 34.0 39.6 44.2 47.0 47.4 45.4 41.5 36.4 29.9 19.9 25.3 32.2 38.6 43.7 47.1 48.3 46.8 43.3 38.2 32.2 25.7 1S.3 21.4 29.1 35.7 41.3 45.7 48.4 48.8 46.8 43.0 38.0 31.4 t 20.8 26.1 32.9 39.2 44.4 � .� 47.2 43.7 38.7 32.7 26.2 1S.6 21.9 29.7 36.3 42.0 46.4 I-S), .2 47.1 43.3 38.4 31.9 20.8 25.6 32.2 38.1 43.2 45.9 42.6 37.8 32.0 25.6 1S.0 21.3 29.0 35.4 40.9 45.3 �7.6 .7 45.9 42.3 37.6 31.2 19.3 23.8 30.1 35.7 40.2 43.2 44.2 43.0 39.9 35.6 30.0 23.7 1-, .4 19.5 26.9 32.9 38.1 42.2 44.5 44.7 43.1 39.7 35.2 29.2 17.0 21.1 26.9 31.9 35.9 38.5 39.6 38.5 35.9 32.0 26.8 21.0 1�.3 16.9 23.7 29.4 34.0 37.5 39.7 40.1 38.6 35.5 31.5 26.1 14.4 17.8 22.7 27.0 30.6 32.9 33.7 32.9 30.7 27.2 22.8 17.9 1-,.9 14.2 20.0 24.9 29.1 32.1 34.0 34.3 33.1 30.4 26.8 22.2 11.5 14.1 18.2 21.7 24.8 26.8 27.6 26.9 24.9 22.1 18.6 14.5 IC .4 11.4 16.1 20.1 23.5 26.2 27.8 28.1 27.1 24.9 21.7 17.8 9.0 10.9 14.0 16.8 19.3 21.0 21.6 21.0 19.3 17.1 14.3 11.1 8.1 8.9 12.4 15.5 18.3 20.5 21.9 22.1 21.2 19.4 16.8 13.6 • 7.2 8.6 10.6 12.5 14.3 15.7 16.1 15.6 14.4 12.8 10.7 8.4 �6.4 7.1 �9.6 11.8 13.8 15.3 16.3 16.6 16.0 14.5 12.6 10.3 5.7 �6.7 8.0 �9.0 10.2 11.2 11.4 11.0 10.3 �9.3 7.9 �6.4 5.0 5.6 7.4 8.8 10.1 11.1 11.6 11.9 11.5 10.5 �9.2 7.8 M 2.1 2. 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.7 3. 3.5 3.3 3.0 2. 2.2 2. 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.j 3.5 3.4 2.8 2 3 2.6 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.7 dr 3.8 3.7 3. 3.6 3.3 2 2.7 3. 4.1 4.9 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.5 4.3 3.9 2,S 2.8 3.7 4.2 4.5 4.7 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.5 4.3 3.6 2 9 3.3 4.1 4.4 4.6 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.2 3 i 3.9 4.� 5.2 5.8 6.2 6.9 6.9 6.� 6.0 5.5 4.8 3,E 3.5 4.� 5.5 5.9 6.3 6.5 6.5 76.3 76.0 5.5 4.5 2 7 4.1 5.1 5.7 76.2 76.5 76.7 76.6 76.4I 76.0 5.9 4 i 4.9 5.� 7.0 7.9 8.6 79.0 79.0 8.� 8.2 7.3 6.2 4,6 4.5 6.� 7.2 8.1 8.7 9.0 9.1 8.� 8.2 7.2 5.8 '4 6 5.2 76.j 7.6 8.5 79.0 79.2 79.2 8.1 8.1 7.0 6 I79 111111 ! `• 5.9 8.� 9.7 11.2 12.5 13.2 13.3 12.8 11.7 10.2 8.4 76,C 5.9 8.� 9.9 11.4 12.6 13.3 13.4 12I8 11.7 10.1 7.8 1-6 1 76.9 8.9 10.7 12.1 13.1 13.6 13.4 12f 11.4 79.7 8 - ■ 7.9 11�0 13.7 16.2 18.3 19.4 19.4 18I5 16.7 14.3 11.4 7,S 7.9 11 t 14.0 16.5 18.4 19.4 19.5 18I6 16.7 14.2 10.93 2 �9.3 1213 15.0 17.4 19.1 19.8 19.4 18.I2 16.3 13.7 1 10.6 14 9 18.8 22.3 25.0 26.3 26.3 25 1 22.6 19.2 15.2 10.4 10.5 15 19.1 22.6 25.1 26.4 26.4 25 1 22.6 19.3 14.6 1h.8 12.3 16 4 23.7 25.9 26.8 26.3 24 7 22.0 18.2 1 . 13.7 19.3 24.1 28.3 31.4 33.0 33.0 31.4 28.5 24.6 19.8 1 .6 13.6 19.7 24.6 28.7 31.7 33.4 33.3 31.6 28.6 24.6 18.8 '111.1 16.0 21.6 26.3 30.0 32.7 33.8 33.2 31.1 27.8 23.2 1 . I� 17.0 23.5 29.0 33.7 37.3 39.2 39.2 37.3 33.9 29.5 24.2 1( .8 16.8 24.1 29.5 34.2 37.6 39.4 39.4 37.5 33.9 29.4 22.9 1f 5 19.8 26.2 31.4 35.7 38.7 39.9 39.3 36.8 32.9 27.9 2 . 19.5 26.8 32.7 37.9 41.8 43.8 43.8 41.8 37.9 33.1 27.4 1S.3 19.3 27.4 33.3 38.3 42.1 44.0 43.9 41.8 38.0 33.1 26.0 '20.0 22.7 29.7 35.2 40.0 43.3 44.6 43.8 41.0 36.7 31.2 2 . 21.0 28.7 34.8 40.2 44 96 $ 4 44.2 40.2 35.3 29.4 2(.7 20.9 29.4 35.5 40.8 44. 4-6s .5 44.3 40.3 35.3 27.9 2:..5 24.5 31.8 37.5 42.5 7 46.4 43.6 39.1 33.2 2 ". 21.3 29.2 35.3 40.8 45.0 -7#,1` 47.0 44.9 41.0 36.0 30.1 21.2 21.3 29.9 35.9 41.3 45.5 47. 17.2 44.9 41.0 36.1 28.6 22.l 25.0 32.4 38.2 43.2 46. .9 47.0 44.3 40.0 34.2 2t. 1 20.9 28.6 34.5 39.7 43.8 46.1 46.1 44.1 40.4 35.3 29.6 2C.9 20.8 29.2 35.0 40.2 44.3 46.5 46.3 44.2 40.3 35.5 28.1 2:..7 24.4 31.5 37.3 42.2 45.6 47.0 46.2 43.4 39.3 33.6 2 19.8 27.1 32.8 37.9 41.9 44.3 44.5 42.5 38.9 34.0 28.2 1 .9 19.7 27.6 33.4 38.4 42.3 44.6 44.7 42.6 38.9 34.1 26.8 211.6 23.1 29.9 35.5 40.4 43.8 45.2 44.6 41.8 37.6 31.9 2' 18.4 25.4 31.2 36.5 40.6 42.8 43.1 41.2 37.5 32.6 26.8 1 .8 18.5 26.1 31.8 37.0 41.1 43.3 43.3 41.3 37.6 32.6 25.4 '19.3 21.6 28.2 33.9 38.8 42.4 43.8 43.3 40.5 36.1 r?Ol'w"25 17.6 24.4 30.3 3 42.9 40.9 36.8 31.6 25.8 1£.0 17.7 25.1 31.0 36.5 40.8 43.1 43.1 40.8 36.9 31.7 24.5 18.5 20.6 27.2 33.1 38.4 42.2 43.7 43.1 40.2 35.5 ■ 17.6 24.5 30.7 36.5 41.1 43.6 43.7 41.5 37.3 31.8 25.9 1£.0 17.7 25.2 31.3 37.1 41.6 44.0 43.9 41.5 37.4 32.0 24.7 1=.7 20.6 27.3 33.6 39.1 42.9 44.5 43.9 40.9 35.9 29.9 2,, , 18.5 25.8 32.1 37.9 42.4 44.9 45.0 42.7 38.5 33.2 27.0 15.7 18.6 26.5 32.7 38.4 42.9 45.2 45.1 42.7 38.6 33.3 25.8 '19.6 21.8 28.7 35.0 40.9 44.3 45.8 44.9 41.9 37.1 30.9 2,` t 20.0 27.6 34.0 39.7 44.1 46.6 46.7 44.3 40.1 34.8 28.7 20.1 20.1 28.3 34.7 40.1 44.5 46.8 46.8 44.4 40.2 34.9 27.3 20.9 23.4 30.7 36.9 42.1 45.9 47.5 46.6 43.4 38.7 32.7 2'. •'� 21.3 29.2 35.6 41.2 45.6 48.1 48.1 45.6 41.4 36.2 30.1 2_.4 21.3 29.9 36.3 41.8 46.1 48.4 48.3 45.8 41.6 36.4 28.7 22.2 24.9 32.3 38.4 43.6 47.3 48.9 48.1 45.0 40.4 34.5 2 21.8 29.9 36.2 41.8 46 � 8.2 45.8 41.8 36.8 30.6 2:.8 21.8 30.3 36.5 42.3 46. 98_ 8.5 46.0 41.9 36.8 29.2 22.7 25.6 32.9 39.0 •44.3 4j.48.3 45.2 40.6 34.7 2 . 21.3 29.2 35.4 40.8 45. 47. 97.0 44.8 41.0 36.0 29.9 2:.3 21.1 29.6 35.5 40.9 45. 47.4 97.1 44.8 40.9 36.0 28.5 2`.l 24.9 32.2 38.1 •43.3 '46.!J3 46.7 43.7 39.2 33.5 2 . 19.3 27.0 32.9 38.0 41.9 44.1 44.1 42.1 38.4 33.6 28.0 1'.i.7 19.2 27.3 33.2 38.0 42.0 44.2 44.1 42.0 38.4 33.7 26.7 20.5 22.9 30.0 35.7 40.3 43.5 44.6 43.7 41.1 36.8 31.5 2 . 16.9 23.9 29.3 33.8 37.3 39.5 39.5 37.7 34.4 30.1 25.0 1-'.4 16.8 24.1 29.6 33.9 37.3 39.4 39.5 37.8 34.5 30.1 23.7 18.0 20.1 26.6 31.8 35.9 38.8 39.9 39.1 36.8 33.1 28.3 2 14.1 20.1 24.9 28.8 31.9 33.7 33.8 32.2 29.4 25.6 21.1 11.7 14.2 20.4 25.2 29.0 31.9 33.6 33.8 32.4 29.5 25.6 20.0 15.1 16.8 22.5 27.0 30.6 33.1 34.0 33.4 31.4 28.3 24.0 2 ME 11.3 16.0 20.0 23.3 26.0 27.5 27.6 26.2 24.0 20.7 16.9 1-.8 11.3 16.2 20.3 23.6 26.1 27.5 27.6 26.4 23.9 20.7 16.1 12.0 13.4 18.0 21.8 24.8 27.1 27.9 27.3 25.7 23.0 19.3 1,, 8.8 12.3 15.3 18.0 20.2 21.5 21.6 20.5 18.6 16.1 13.0 �9,1 8.8 12.5 15.5 18.2 20.4 21.6 21.6 20.5 18.6 16.0 12.4 �9.4 10.4 13.9 16.9 19.4 21.2 21.9 21.4 20.1 17.9 15.0 1 . 76.8 79.3 11.5 13.4 15.0 16.0 16.2 15.3 13.9 12.1 10.0 7,C 6.8 9.6 11.7 13.6 15.2 16.2 16.2 15.3 14.0 12.1 79.4 '7 2 8.1 10.7 12.7 14.4 15.9 16.5 16.1 15.1 13.6 11.5 9 5.2 76.9 8.5 79.7 10.6 11.3 11.6 11.0 10.0 8.9 7.7 5 5 5.3 7.3 8.8 79.8 10.8 11.6 11.6 11.0 10.1 79.0 7.2 '�) 6 76.3 8.1 9.3 10.3 11.4 11.9 11.6 10.9 10.1 8.7 7 ; a.5 5.3 �6. Q G 8.4 8.1 7.7 7.1 �6 ° 4.1 5.4 �6.6 8.0 8.4 8.6 8.3 7 0 �6.9 5.7 4 5 5.0 �6 .7 8.5 ° ° 8.1 7.7 �6.8 �_ rI • r' or r Scale: 1 inch= 5 Ft. ..a 10 04 A 04 " w "oo A w ro G N H m A 7 H -H ,0 CL a) 3 b+ mu H . G a ttl .H G - Um O k" w m U+ O U H A ro +� o m •d 0 r v o H a a Ia 4� o c o m ,�., N o m .0 b� W ,M 0 N U w C w " H ttl W 0 1 U v aaHi'vv" a) .1 sai U G N >r Wm rom ro o v +� v-" o b, G N� o 1Hi Q, N m o ro 'o N O 'O H 'O u o .a v ro-" aU '0 .G N 4)o C ro W O) fL' m H o W ro a a O E N 'O C N O a N o m o O !L � N C H m o v A N o N O g a 0 ro o as b a o ti 1 m -0 a, >+N yw o Nti yw+23 O b� G G 2 O O E '0 rl W G H N O G W C4 a (L CL h G O v h w ." w E e~ a "" ro 0 0 0 H 41-Ho roromE >r a N N N H N N G G G U i-7 tWv v o O N O �ro v a ?i m Uwp o H H 0 0 ro A ai R, W N H N H N H a ro N A w I Ga." ow rnro > a to C4 CL o v Atn ,cy" w ro o ti A c o w tP N a N Hv N 4 N H > p '0 7 W ,C v o > N O H oa Q E w E a o 1 -.Hi ro Q M i U) N O m NT CD CEO (� m m E z U LU m .- m N (a (n 0 LL Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Description PtSpcLr PtSpcTb Meter Type 1 W N C N N m.A a a ,H 0 a Garages Illuminance Fc 24.70 49.3 2.1 11.76 23.48 Readings taken at 0'-0" AFF 2 2 Normal ° ° b N 3 W UI * * *LAYOUT AND BOM ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL * * * O N UI A u ro o m m o b b o ro ro v C O m a o ul.oi bW .-I +.i N U W C W •+ u� m o 3.0 C rn U uminaireSchedule v aaui'ro v" m �m sai rnoE`o°mm'Ac`m'�� C+�room+�romarno a .i ul S1 N S1 u1 +tT' C U mmo� Symbol Qty Tag Label Arrangement Lum. Lumens Arr. Lum. Lumens LLF Description Lum. Watts Arr. Watts Total Watts Filename �o c aro a ornvroG°E Im>H 0 10 H H 17-120 SINGLE 19455 19455 1.000 H 17-120W-5K 123.944 123.944 1239.44 H 17-120W-5K_I ES NA2002. ies m row m a m e o w m rz m o a m v +o, w a y -1 !L o a)N C (~ u u d m o o A N N O C a ri o C (L rl N T7 �r m o moasbaotiamimv°' m y w o N ti y W 'O O b C C LG C H 3 N _o m >r I r W o b O� -.Ui -ro U o LL bC H O -.i O E r+ rl W C u m o C W o o4 a n, a h q o m h w .w E o o 1: 1 w o, -H m o 0 oo u o-H u ,�Nroco��.crosro,waci o e >r a N N N H N N C C C U i-7 twv N W p N yO N O �ro o ro a d ?i m U o H o o Expanded Luminaire Location Summary N �-- HA,ai� y G b+ro >. .� w C.� m o m m q.� N m N o+ LumNo Tag Orient Tilt o Ca.�W rnro>a ro o to C4 � CL o v Atn , C ?i W N u C S4 H U 4C 1H �A � ow m_ 7.77 44.95 15 0 0>vo a ro> v a a v 2 H 17.77 24.81 15 0 0 rl tgNWtq (1N A p m a m H N o w 4 C (L E04 01HM 3 H 43.06 44.95 15 0 0 4 H 43.06 24.81 15 0 0 5 H 66.79 44.95 15 0 0 6 H 66.79 24.81 15 0 0 7 H 90.73 44.95 15 0 0 8 H 90.73 24.81 15 0 0 9 H 114.12 44.95 15 0 0 Q 10 H 114.12 24.81 15 0 0 Total Quantity: 10 Q U) a) z N U O NT m CD m W E m (n 0 LL NOTES: * The light loss factor (LLF) is a product of many variables, only lamp lumen depreciation (LLD) has been applied to the calculated results unless otherwise noted. The LLD is the result (quotient) of mean lumens / initial lumens per lamp manufacturers' specifications. * Illumination values shown (in footcandles) are the predicted results for planes of calculation either to the plane of calculation. * The calculated results of this lighting simulation represent an anticipated prediction of system performance. Actual measured results may vary from the anticipated performance and are subject to means and methods which are beyond the control of the designer. * Mounting height determination is job site specific, our lighting simulations assume a mounting height (insertion point of the luminaire symbol) to be taken at the top of the symbol for ceiling mounted luminaires and at the bottom of the symbol for all other luminaire mounting configurations. * RAB Lighting Inc. luminaire and product designs are protected under U.S. and International intellectual property laws. horizontal, vertical or inclined as designated in the calculation summary. Meter orientation is normal Patents issued or pending apply. ! 11 #$# # % # #$ 3 +././/-) 0 1 ! - 4) '5 - ) 0$6" 1 0.1 78+9/ .//-)4!: 78*+;<) 0$6"1 0+1 78*8/ .//-)4!: 78*=8< 5 7=> m (. # 5$ )0#5$1 $ " # l )<7 .1 4)' +1 @5! ) AA ) AA4 *1 5 #3#6.= AAAA B B. = =1 C4) !C 81 D4 % 4)E&$ G 1 D5' @ ,$ $# +; ;1 D4) )5E3' 91 D ! E'$ ' )AAA &AB F )E 4.797 955 954 -952- - 95/ 952 -953— 1 954 1 O" GFa55 C 954 1 g56 (;A VEL 1 � l SMl � I — R/m 954.10 / In 9/8. W ❑T — RCP 15" \�.4 RCP /n v--95 RCP P In v=95L i LEGEND: DIRECTION OF FLOW N Z O d U U) w 0' 20' 40' o SCALE:1 "=40' SITE PLAN INFORMATION: PARCEL AREA: • 1.46 ACRES ± SITE DATA EXISTING P1 PROPOSED P2 PROPOSED PAVEMENT AREA 789 SF 24,735 SF 19,429 SF BUILDING AREA 0 SF 7,200 SF 17,040 SF PERVIOUS AREA 63,149 SF 32,003 SF 27,459 SF TOTAL AREA 63,938 SF 63,938 SF 63,938 SF CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 w 0 >wo -t 2 2 2 z o IN0 O 2 O o O d N m m m 0 w W -i Z Z O (� Z U Q w of 2 J zN O v N M v / z 0 0 — M Lr),t Lu op Zop N W N W H w Yr a a � wr - � � mQ wLL o� O "Z� Q wN �N W j w Z cn c° �a ♦^ v/ >Zw �Z 04 �04 wN V c� w O � O/r co 06 Z>> OJ W -iUW �I N z rC O O 0 0 U J -I-- O •D m w m o = co a U m DC w 0 a °� U SHEET NO. Q w Q z Q (D z x w N O N T 0-1 NW OUtIE Existing Lot SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for Existing Mastercraft I Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates, Printed 5/28/2024 HydroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Existing Mastercraft Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 5/28/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 2 Rainfall Events Listing Event# Event Storm Type Curve Mode Duration B/B Depth AMC Name (hours) (inches) 1 2-Year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.84 2 2 10-Year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 4.22 2 3 100-Year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 6.87 2 Existing Mastercraft Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (s u bcatc h m e nt-numbers ) 1.450 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (EX-1) 0.018 96 Gravel surface, HSG B (EX-1) 1.468 61 TOTAL AREA Printed 5/28/2024 Paae 3 Existing Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 5/28/2024 HydroCAD®10.20-5a s/n 02380 ©2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment EX-1: Existing Lot Runoff = 0.44 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af, Depth= 0.31" Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description 63,149 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 789 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 63,938 61 Weighted Average 63,938 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX-1: Existing Lot Hydrograph ■ Runoff Z--Yeoi RAi 0.1E 0.1E 0.14 0.12 0.1 C 0.02 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) Existing Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 5/28/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 5 Summary for Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Inflow Area = 1.468 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.31" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.44 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.037 of Primary = 0.44 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Hydrograph ❑ Inflow p Primary 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) Existing Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 5/28/2024 HydroCAD®10.20-5a s/n 02380 ©2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment EX-1: Existing Lot Runoff = 2.04 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.113 af, Depth= 0.93" Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 63,149 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 789 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 63,938 61 Weighted Average 63,938 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX-1: Existing Lot Hydrograph ❑ Runoff 2 04 cfs I 2 MSE 244hr 3 1 0-Year Rain 1 =4.2'2" Runoff Area= ,93 SF Runoff Volume .11 aF Ru nc ff De tl =IM 3Td=5.0 min U- 1 Pi Time (hours) I Existing Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 5/28/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Inflow Area = 1.468 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.93" for 10-Year event Inflow = 2.04 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.113 of Primary = 2.04 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.113 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs E w u 3 0 LL 1 0 Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Hydrograph 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Existing Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 5/28/2024 HydroCAD®10.20-5a s/n 02380 ©2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment EX-1: Existing Lot Runoff = 6.33 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.319 af, Depth= 2.61" Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Area (sf) CN Description 63,149 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 789 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 63,938 61 Weighted Average 63,938 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX-1: Existing Lot Hydrograph 7- 6� MS 244hr 3 00-Year R.ainfal =F)J 7" 5 Runoff Area=63,938 sF RumrAf VOIN M= f- 4 uncff Dert = . 1" 3 v_ 3 CN=61 z 1 Time (hours) I ❑ Runoff Existing Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 5/28/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Inflow Area = 1.468 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.61" for 100-Year event Inflow = 6.33 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.319 of Primary = 6.33 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.319 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 7 6 5 w 4 u 3 0 LL 3 2 1 0 Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Hydrograph 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Appendix B Drainage Calculations- Proposed Conditions a; Ov 17) —INFILTRATION BASIN 1 95� 151 952 0-1 M 253 SBL SBL CSL U � I M " BUILDI & P2 BUILDI W1 1,320 SF = 1,320 SF ;^ a o I Q L I � I C U- I I u LL � c I I EOF=953.50--_ I � ►: o r ✓p00 00 ao°� INFILTRATION BASIN 2 100 YEAR HWL: 953.45 Q 0 — •• •00 EOF=952.80 � O { V 953 952 sm/ i— Rim 954. l In 918.1 � �I ❑T PR 3 BL SBL (n 950 s \ I I W g54 \ \ _ I J.51 FL 0 8 % a N U) J \ \ o W LL N r- 955 �j� I FL 2.0 0 n I irA7 ,633 SF i mI` LEGEND: DIRECTION OF FLOW N Z O d U U) w 0' 20' 40' o SCALE:1 "=40' SITE PLAN INFORMATION: PARCEL AREA: • 1.46 ACRES ± SITE DATA EXISTING P1 PROPOSED P2 PROPOSED PAVEMENT AREA 789 SF 24,735 SF 19,429 SF BUILDING AREA 0 SF 7,200 SF 17,040 SF PERVIOUS AREA 63,149 SF 32,003 SF 27,459 SF TOTAL AREA 63,938 SF 63,938 SF 63,938 SF CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 w 0 >wo -t g g g z o IN0 O o O o O !Z N zN O I _ V N M v/ z 0 O M Lr),t W (/� op Z op N W N W � w a a U w� .. > w � co mQ �LL w o� O "Z< Z�'Q wN wN I j w Z U) c° (DZ WN V U) w O LL O/r <iz �UW O J W �/ �� N z ryo 0 O a", a Lu 0 O w J U a p z m LL am ° c) 0 U pip Lu L/ oC O Lu 0 CL O � o � 5a U SHEET NO. E2 N O N T NWbutlet 2P Infiltrtion Ba PR-3 3roposed 3 /1F'\ Infiltrtion sin PR-1 sin Proposed 1 PR-2 Proposed 2 SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for Proposed Mastercraft I Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates, Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Mastercraft Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 2 Rainfall Events Listing Event# Event Storm Type Curve Mode Duration B/B Depth AMC Name (hours) (inches) 1 2-Year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.84 2 2 10-Year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 4.22 2 3 100-Year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 6.87 2 Proposed Mastercraft Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (s u bcatc h m e nt-numbers ) 0.631 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (PR-1, PR-2, PR-3) 0.446 98 Paved parking, HSG B (PR-1) 0.391 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B (PR-1, PR-2) 1.468 82 TOTAL AREA Printed 6/6/2024 Paae 3 Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 4 Summary for Subcatchment PR-1: Proposed 1 Runoff = 2.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.140 af, Depth= 1.76" Routed to Pond 1 P : Infiltrtion Basin 1 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description 19,429 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,120 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 10,101 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 41,650 89 Weighted Average 10,101 24.25% Pervious Area 31,549 75.75% Impervious Area 12,120 38.42% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR-1: Proposed 1 Hydrograph 3 ❑Runoff 2.76 cfs MSE 244hr 3 2-Year Rainfal ='.&4" RuraOff Arec i_ f-- 2 Runoff Volume .1 aF Ru ncoff De t = 6" T = in LL J 1 /I 89 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 1 1 .1 Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment PR-2: Proposed 2 Runoff = 0.41 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.021 af, Depth= 0.91" Routed to Pond 2P : Infiltrtion Basin 2 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 4,920 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 7,165 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 12,085 76 Weighted Average 7,165 59.29% Pervious Area 4,920 40.71% Impervious Area 4,920 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR-2: Proposed 2 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff 0.36 0.34 0.32 i R J n 0.3 0.28 i Ruraof- 0.26 0.24 i I i Rt 0 0.22 LL 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 ^0.1 I ii r, L-A MI&Y, w . a imp r � i H 10 12 14 16 18 1 1 1 0 .1 Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment PR-3: Proposed 3 Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.31" Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 10,204 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,204 61 Weighted Average 10,204 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR-3: Proposed 3 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff 0.075o.0 0.07� 0.065--- 0.06L 0.055 0.05- w 0.045-:-/ 0.W' R. 0 a 0.035� 0.03 0.025� 0.02�-// 0.015� 0.01 0.005�-Z MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfal1=2.64" Runoff Area=I0,204 sF Runoff `Jc-lume=0.006 of Fk -off-Bit =0. 1" Tc Z0 min r.N ___I 6,I-- 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Pond 1 P: Infiltrtion Basin 1 Inflow Area = 0.956 ac, 75.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.76" for 2-Year event Inflow = 2.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.140 of Outflow = 0.04 cfs @ 16.38 hrs, Volume= 0.138 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 253.7 min Discarded = 0.04 cfs @ 16.38 hrs, Volume= 0.138 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 952.51' @ 16.38 hrs Surf.Area= 4,135 sf Storage= 4,588 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 1,169.4 min calculated for 0.138 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 1,161.1 min ( 1,958.3 - 797.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 951.00' 9,422 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 951.00 1,973 0 0 952.00 3,371 2,672 2,672 953.00 4,868 4,120 6,792 953.50 5,655 2,631 9,422 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 951.00' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 952.80' 5.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.04 cfs @ 16.38 hrs HW=952.51' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.04 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=951.00' (Free Discharge) L2= Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 3 0 LL 1 Pond 1 P: Infiltrtion Basin 1 Hydrograph Ifl Aea0.5 Peak le -J ; for ce - M 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Inflow ■ Outflow ■ Discarded ac ■ Primary .1 �c Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Pond 2P: Infiltrtion Basin 2 Inflow Area = 0.277 ac, 40.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.91" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.41 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.021 of Outflow = 0.02 cfs @ 13.71 hrs, Volume= 0.021 af, Atten= 95%, Lag= 92.8 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 13.71 hrs, Volume= 0.021 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 952.30' @ 13.71 hrs Surf.Area= 1,836 sf Storage= 518 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 290.0 min calculated for 0.021 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 289.9 min ( 1,120.8 - 830.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 952.00' 4,820 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 952.00 1,633 0 0 953.00 2,314 1,974 1,974 954.00 3,379 2,847 4,820 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 952.00' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 953.50' 20.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 13.71 hrs HW=952.30' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=952.00' (Free Discharge) L2= Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 0.44 0.42 0.4 /-,/0z,x, 0.38- w 0.26= 0.24-1 3 0.22-2 ° 0.2' 0.18' 0.16' 0.14= 0.12= 0.1 ' Pond 2P: Infiltrtion Basin 2 Hydrograph 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Outflow ■ Discarded ❑ Primary Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Inflow Area = 1.468 ac, 57.04% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.05" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.07 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Primary = 0.07 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Hydrograph 0.075! .07! 0 0.065! 0.06� 0.055� 0.05� w 0.045� 0.045 0 LL 0.035� 0.03� 0.025� 0.02 M 0.015� 0.01:0.005 ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Inflow Ar6a=1:468 ac— ..................................... 24—,,—,,-3,1.... 32 ,,14—,,-3,1...40 ,,12—,14-4,1.... 48 ,,,—,,-5,1...516 ,,,—,, 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment PR-1: Proposed 1 Runoff = 4.66 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.241 af, Depth= 3.03" Routed to Pond 1 P : Infiltrtion Basin 1 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 19,429 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,120 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 10,101 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 41,650 89 Weighted Average 10,101 24.25% Pervious Area 31,549 75.75% Impervious Area 12,120 38.42% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR-1: Proposed 1 Hydrograph 5 4 66 cfs MSE 244hr 3 4 i O-Y ear Ramf i =4.2" Runoff Are<<= 11,69sF Rw off Volunll 1 of " 3 Ru ncoff De t .03" LL r =min 2 = 89 1 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58.1 ❑ Runoff Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Subcatchment PR-2: Proposed 2 Runoff = 0.88 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af, Depth= 1.91" Routed to Pond 2P : Infiltrtion Basin 2 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 4,920 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 7,165 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 12,085 76 Weighted Average 7,165 59.29% Pervious Area 4,920 40.71% Impervious Area 4,920 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR-2: Proposed 2 Hydrograph 0.95 0.9 0.88 ors 0.85 I IV � � ;94-hr .3 0.8 t"- ear fallT4,1 0.75 1 0.7 1.Iw — 0.65 1 0.6 1 1 Runoff ki a 00.55 0.5 0.45-�'/ 1 1 LL 0.35C =76 � 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 ❑ Runoff Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Subcatchment PR-3: Proposed 3 Runoff = 0.33 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.93" Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 10,204 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,204 61 Weighted Average 10,204 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR-3: Proposed 3 Hydrograph 0.36-'!;/ 0.34 0.33 cfs 0.32= � 0.3 / 0.28 0.26-_�/ 0.24-_�/ 0.22 LZ 0.22. = / 3 0.18= / ,i 0.16 0.14 0.1z 0.1- 0.08- 0.06- 0.04= 0.02-_�Z MSF ? -hr 3 I $-Year Rainf'all=4.22" R ur;off Area=1 Os204 sf Kunoft V0ILlme=U.U18 at Runoff Depth=OA-T' 'rc;=8.0 mire CN=61 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Pond 1 P: Infiltrtion Basin 1 Inflow Area = 0.956 ac, 75.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.03" for 10-Year event Inflow = 4.66 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.241 of Outflow = 0.59 cfs @ 12.62 hrs, Volume= 0.222 af, Atten= 87%, Lag= 28.4 min Discarded = 0.05 cfs @ 12.62 hrs, Volume= 0.161 of Primary = 0.54 cfs @ 12.62 hrs, Volume= 0.060 of Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 952.92' @ 12.62 hrs Surf.Area= 4,743 sf Storage= 6,392 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 895.6 min calculated for 0.222 of (92% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 859.3 min ( 1,645.7 - 786.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 951.00' 9,422 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 951.00 1,973 0 0 952.00 3,371 2,672 2,672 953.00 4,868 4,120 6,792 953.50 5,655 2,631 9,422 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 951.00' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 952.80' 5.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.62 hrs HW=952.92' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.05 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.53 cfs @ 12.62 hrs HW=952.92' (Free Discharge) L2= Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.53 cfs @ 0.83 fps) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Pond 1 P: Infiltrtion Basin 1 Hydrograph 5X/ .A ea 0. 5 Peak le =95 2 for ce=15,3 2`c 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Inflow ■ Outflow ■ Discarded ■ Primary Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Pond 2P: Infiltrtion Basin 2 Inflow Area = 0.277 ac, 40.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.91" for 10-Year event Inflow = 0.88 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.044 of Outflow = 0.02 cfs @ 15.14 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 178.8 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 15.14 hrs, Volume= 0.044 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 952.70' @ 15.14 hrs Surf.Area= 2,108 sf Storage= 1,303 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 637.3 min calculated for 0.044 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 636.9 min ( 1,451.5 - 814.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 952.00' 4,820 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 952.00 1,633 0 0 953.00 2,314 1,974 1,974 954.00 3,379 2,847 4,820 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 952.00' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 953.50' 20.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 15.14 hrs HW=952.70' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=952.00' (Free Discharge) L2= Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 0.95- 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 : 0.7: 0.6 u 0.55 0.5' 0 0.45' LL — . _ 0.15' 0.1 Pond 2P: Infiltrtion Basin 2 Hydrograph ❑ Inflow o.Fs cfs ❑ Outflow i _-- 1010AM Ar a 1.277 ac El Discarded — El Primary i ---- Neak EIev=962.-M' _—_--- .5torao.e=A ,303 c _ I 0.02 cfs 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Summary for Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Inflow Area = 1.468 ac, 57.04% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.64" for 10-Year event Inflow = 0.60 cfs @ 12.61 hrs, Volume= 0.079 of Primary = 0.60 cfs @ 12.61 hrs, Volume= 0.079 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs -/ 0.65J 0.6� 0.55� 0.5� 0.45� 0.4 _ / u 0.35 0 LL 0.3 = 0.25� 0 0.2� 0.1 0.1 0.05 Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Hydrograph Wflow Areac=1.463 ac 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Summary for Subcatchment PR-1: Proposed 1 Runoff = 8.27 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.445 af, Depth> 5.58" Routed to Pond 1 P : Infiltrtion Basin 1 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Area (sf) CN Description 19,429 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,120 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 10,101 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 41,650 89 Weighted Average 10,101 24.25% Pervious Area 31,549 75.75% Impervious Area 12,120 38.42% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR-1: Proposed 1 Hydrograph 9� 8.27 cfs $� I MS = 24-hr 3 I Zar Raiffal 1-0i. I11 R u ranff_Ar_e<<= L 6->/ unoff Vol■me .4 aF 5� Ru ncoff De t > .y8" LL T =4 . mirl 3� C = 8 9 2- /1 1 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58.1 ❑ Runoff Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Subcatchment PR-2: Proposed 2 Runoff = 1.90 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af, Depth= 4.14" Routed to Pond 2P : Infiltrtion Basin 2 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 4,920 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 7,165 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 12,085 76 Weighted Average 7,165 59.29% Pervious Area 4,920 40.71% Impervious Area 4,920 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR-2: Proposed 2 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff 2 1.90 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 " 00-Year Rainfal 1=6. T' Runoff Area=12,03 SF Runoff Volume .019aF Runoff Dent = '.0 4" rd= LL C —7� Time (hours) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Summary for Subcatchment PR-3: Proposed 3 Runoff = 1.01 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth= 2.61" Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 10,204 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,204 61 Weighted Average 10,204 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR-3: Proposed 3 Hydrograph .0, cfs MSE 24-hr 3 00-Year Rainfall=6.Y7" Runoff Areci=10,204 sf Ruiioff Volwme=0.051 of 2. Runoff Der th=2.61" 3. rc=8.0 mire IA CN=61 59 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Pond 1 P: Infiltrtion Basin 1 Inflow Area = 0.956 ac, 75.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.58" for 100-Year event Inflow = 8.27 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.445 of Outflow = 5.51 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.422 af, Atten= 33%, Lag= 5.4 min Discarded = 0.06 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.169 of Primary = 5.45 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.254 of Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.27' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 5,292 sf Storage= 8,159 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 491.6 min calculated for 0.422 of (95% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 468.3 min ( 1,242.6 - 774.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 951.00' 9,422 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 951.00 1,973 0 0 952.00 3,371 2,672 2,672 953.00 4,868 4,120 6,792 953.50 5,655 2,631 9,422 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 951.00' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 952.80' 5.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.06 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=953.26' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.06 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=5.36 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=953.26' (Free Discharge) L2= Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 5.36 cfs @ 1.68 fps) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 N U 3 0 LL Pond 1 P: Infiltrtion Basin 1 Hydrograph 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Inflow ■ Outflow ■ Discarded ■ Primary Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCADO 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Summary for Pond 2P: Infiltrtion Basin 2 Inflow Area = 0.277 ac, 40.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.14" for 100-Year event Inflow = 1.90 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.096 of Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 16.62 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 268.1 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 16.62 hrs, Volume= 0.096 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routed to Pond 0-1 : NW Outlet Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.45' @ 16.62 hrs Surf.Area= 2,797 sf Storage= 3,132 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 1,180.9 min calculated for 0.096 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 1,180.7 min ( 1,979.5 - 798.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 952.00' 4,820 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 952.00 1,633 0 0 953.00 2,314 1,974 1,974 954.00 3,379 2,847 4,820 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 952.00' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 953.50' 20.0' long + 4.0 '/' SideZ x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 16.62 hrs HW=953.45' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=952.00' (Free Discharge) L2= Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HydroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Pond 2P: Infiltrtion Basin 2 Hydrograph 0.03 cfs it .A ea 0.: arc le =9 for ce=;t, 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) r�.5 2c ■ Inflow ■ Outflow ■ Discarded ■ Primary Proposed Mastercraft MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Printed 6/6/2024 HvdroCAD® 10.20-5a s/n 02380 © 2023 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Summary for Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Inflow Area = 1.468 ac, 57.04% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.49" for 100-Year event Inflow = 6.16 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.304 of Primary = 6.16 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.304 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 6 5 N 4 w u 3 0 LL 3 2 1 0 Pond 0-1: NW Outlet Hydrograph 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary Appendix C Additional Design Information Project Information Calculator Version: Project Name: User Name / Company Name: Date: Project Description: Construction Permit?: Site Information Retention Requirement (inches): Site's Zip Code: Annual Rainfall (inches): Phosphorus EMC (mg/1): TSS EMC (mg/1): Total Site Area Version 4: July 2020 Mastercraft Outdoors Bogart, Pederson & Associates 5-28-2204 Monticello, MN Yes 1.1 55362 29.2 0.3 54.5 Land Cover A Soils B Soils (acres) (acres) Forest/Open Space - Undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Managed Turf - disturbed, graded for yards or 0.63 other turf to be mowed/managed Site Areas Routed to BMPs Land Cover A Soils B Soils (acres) (acres) Forest/Open Space - Undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Managed Turf - disturbed, graded for yards or 0.38 other turf to be mowed/managed C Soils D Soils Total (acres) (acres) (acres) 0 0.63 Impervious Area (acres) 0.84 Total Area (acres) 1.47 C Soils D Soils Total (acres) (acres) (acres) 0 0.38 Impervious Area (acres) 0.84 Total Area (acres) 1.22 Summary Information Performance Goal Requirement Performance goal volume retention requirement: 3354 Volume removed by BMPs towards performance goal: 3354 Percent volume removed towards performance goal 100 Annual Volume and Pollutant Load Reductions Post development annual runoff volume 2.0236 Annual runoff volume removed by BMPs: 1.897 Percent annual runoff volume removed: 94 Post development annual particulate P load: 0.9082 Annual particulate P removed by BMPs: 0.851 Post development annual dissolved P load: 0.743 Annual dissolved P removed by BMPs: 0.697 Total P removed by BMPs 1.548 Percent annual total phosphorus removed: 94 Post development annual TSS load: 300 Annual TSS removed by BMPs: 281.2 Percent annual TSS removed: 94 BMP Summary Performance Goal Summary BMP Volume Volume BMP Name Capacity Recieved (ft3) (ft3) Infiltration Basin 2 3360 439 Infiltration Basin 1 5888 2915 Annual Volume Summary Volume Volume From From Direct BMP Name Upstream Watershed BMPs (acre-ft) (acre-ft) Infiltration Basin 2 0.2946 0 Infiltration Basin 1 1.6195 0 Particulate Phosphorus Summary ft3 ft3 acre-ft acre-ft Ibs Ibs Ibs Ibs Ibs Ibs Ibs Volume Volume Retained Outflow Percent Retained (%) (ft3) (ft3) 439 0 100 2915 0 100 Volume Volume Percent Retained outflow Retained (acre-ft) (acre-ft) M 0.2946 0 100 1.6024 0.0170999999 99 Load From Load From Load Outflow Direct Upstream Percent BMP Name Retained Load Watershed BMPs Retained (%) (Ibs) (Ibs) (Ibs) (Ibs) Infiltration Basin 2 0.1322 0 0.1322 0 100 Infiltration Basin 1 0.7268 0 0.7191 0.0077 99 Dissolved Phosphorus Summary Load From Load From Load Outflow BMP Name Direct Upstream Retained Load Percent Watershed BMPs Retained (%) (Ibs) (Ibs) (Ibs) (Ibs) Infiltration Basin 2 0.1082 0 0.1082 0 100 Infiltration Basin 1 0.5947 0 0.5884 0.0063 99 Total Phosphorus Summary Load From Load From Load Outflow Direct Upstream Percent BMP Name Retained Load Watershed BMPs Retained (%) (Ibs) (Ibs) (Ibs) (Ibs) Infiltration Basin 2 0.2404 0 0.2404 0 100 Infiltration Basin 1 1.3215 0 1.3075 0.014 99 TSS Summary Load From Load From Load Outflow BMP Name Direct Upstream Retained Load Percent Watershed BMPs Retained (%) (Ibs) (Ibs) (Ibs) (Ibs) Infiltration Basin 2 43.66 0 43.66 0 100 Infiltration Basin 1 240.08 0 237.55 2.53 99 BMP Schematic Infiltration Basin 1 In tration Basin 2 USDA United States Department of Agriculture N RCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota May 14, 2024 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nres142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface.................................................................................................................... 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8 SoilMap................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 MapUnit Legend................................................................................................ 11 MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Wright County, Minnesota...............................................................................13 406—Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ......................................... 13 References............................................................................................................15 :l How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and I. Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. N. Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map Bo F F v v M M m m 438240 438250 43M 436270 438280 438290 438300 438310 438320 438330 438.'340 43&350 43M 438370 438.W 45° 17 33" N o o � 8 t� 0 sip 53 g Soil Map may not be valid at this le. '�"• �3 45° 17 29" N I I 'I I J 45° 1729" N 438240 438250 438260 438270 438280 438290 438300 438310 438320 438330 438340 43M 43M 438370 438380 3 3 fn 6o Map Scale: 1:702 fi printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. v Meters N 0 10 20 40 60 O 0A2t 0 30 EO 120 180 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge fics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 9 MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons .y Soil Map Unit Lines 0 Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features V Blowout • Borrow Pit # Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot O Landfill ALava Flow Marsh or swamp �► Mine or Quarry OMiscellaneous Water OPerennial Water V Rock Outcrop + Saline Spot Sandy Spot _ Severely Eroded Spot C Sinkhole Slide or Slip 0o Sodic Spot Custom Soil Resource Report Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation a r Rails N Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background W Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 10, 2023 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 29, 2023—Sep 13, 2023 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 10 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 2.3 100.0% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 2.3 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. 11 Custom Soil Resource Report An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Wright County, Minnesota 406—Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2wOm2 Elevation: 660 to 1,710 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 48 degrees F Frost -free period: 120 to 170 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Dorset and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Dorset Setting Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 11 inches: sandy loam Bt - 11 to 20 inches: sandy loam 2Bk - 20 to 38 inches: gravelly coarse sand 2C - 38 to 79 inches: gravelly coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R057XY012MN - Sandy Prairie Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091AN002MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Corliss Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091AN022MN) Hydric soil rating: No Oylen Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Forada Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Swales Down -slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral (G091AN0031VIN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Forada, occasionally ponded Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Depressions Down -slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral (G091AN0031VIN) Hydric soil rating: Yes 14 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nres142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 15 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/deta il/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid=nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2_052290.pdf 09 MINUTES JOINT MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Tuesday, January 2, 2024 — 5:00 p.m. Monticello Community Center Planning Commissioners Present: Chair Paul Konsor, Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Rob Stark Planning Commissioners Absent: City Councilmembers Present: City Councilmembers Absent: Staff Present: 1. Call to Order Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck Mayor Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Tracy Hinz Lee Martie, Sam Murdoff Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Ron Hackenmueller, Hayden Stensgard Chair Paul Konsor called the joint workshop of the Monticello Planning Commission and City Council to order at 5:01 p.m. Added Item Recently appointed Planning Commissioner Rob Stark was administered the Oath of Office by Chair Konsor. 2. Concept Stage Planned Unit Development Submittal for the potential Phased Development of an Industrial Services principal use in the 1-2, Heavy Industrial District PID: 155-249-001010 Applicant: Tim Flander/Big Bear Holdings, LLC. Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview of the purpose of the joint workshop meeting. The purpose was for a concept stage Planned Unit Development review aimed at providing helpful and constructive feedback to the development team that presented the concept. Notices were sent out for this meeting to the surrounding area where the development is proposed. Ms. Schumann added that the meeting did not involve a public hearing, but if time allows, residents present may address the group. City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the City Council, Planning Commission, and the public. Previously, the submitter applied for various zoning ordinance amendments that were later withdrawn, as the applicant stated it was not his intention to amend the zoning ordinance in its entirety. Rather, the submitter sought flexibility specifically for their lot in the Oakwood Industrial Park for development of the site to accommodate their Industrial Services business. With this concept stage PUD submittal, the submitter requested flexibility from design standards related to exterior building finish, surfacing of vehicle use and storage areas, and an increase in the maximum allowed square footage of outdoor storage. The group was asked to have an open discussion on the proposed flexibility areas, and how they would coincide with the City's overall land use goals. Mayor Lloyd Hilgart asked how many undeveloped lots were left in Oakwood Industrial Park. Ms. Schumann said that there are 3, including the subject site, that are not developed. Mayor Hilgart said that he did not have an issue with proposed surfacing materials, as that was allowed for the development of the Nuss Truck & Equipment site. However, that development was required to construct a principal building with enhanced materials beyond the minimum standards established by the zoning ordinance. Mr. Hilgart added that the most recent industrial development included brick/stone exterior on a percentage of the buildings, and would not expect there be flexibility to that standard with the subject concept. Joe Elam, Commercial Realty Solutions, noted that the wainscot requirement is somethine that thev plan to address and hp rnnfnrming with the Citv'c, rnr p requirements. Additionally, Mr. Elam added that the proposed metal siding would be coated with a finish that would reflect an EIFS or stucco finish from the public street. Tim Flander, submitter and of Mastercraft Outdoors, addressed the group and the public, and passed around examples of the proposed metal siding for the building. Mr. Flander also noted that the building would include an enhanced gable as well. Andrew Tapper asked what the proposed building's front facade is anticipated to look like. Mr. Elam said that the closest representation would be the industrial building located at 211 Dundas Road within the City. Ms. Schumann noted that variation in the front facade includes more options than the brick/stone requirement proposed by the applicant. Mr. Grittman clarified that the departure from the ordinance standard in this regard is on the metal exterior finish of the building walls, and the submitters have referenced that the proposed walls would include textured finish, rather than plain metal siding. Ms. Schumann asked if the proposed textured metal siding was proposed to be on the entire building, or a portion of it. Mr. Flander clarified that the front wall facing Fallon Avenue, as well as the wall facing north on the proposed layout, would be the textured siding. The remainder of the building that is not as visible to the public would be standard metal siding. Mr. Tapper noted that the most important facades of the building, given the proposed layout, are those that will be sided with coated metal. Mayor Hilgart asked if the site was proposed to have a fence. Mr. Flander clarified that a privacy & security fence is identified on the plan. Mr. Tapper asked if the designated truck & trailer parking is planned to be paved. Mr. Elam clarified that the intention would be to have crushed concrete for the truck & trailer parking, the drive aisle behind the building, as well as the outdoor storage area. Mayor Hilgart reiterated that he did not see an issue with the requested flexibility areas from the code, given the submitters proposed to enhance to sides of the building and surround the storage and private parking area with a fence. Mr. Konsor noted that it is anticipated that Fallon Avenue will see improvements in the future, and that if this site is developed, any opportunity to proactively plan for that would be beneficial. Mr. Tapper expressed concern regarding the request for flexibility from the limitations on outdoor storage in the 1-2 district, given the amount of effort the Planning Commission and Industrial & Economic Development Committee (IEDC) put towards establishing these updated standards in 2021-2022. Councilmember Charlotte Gable concurred, though noted that a little bit of flexibility would be considered but not at the level requesting double the maximum allowable area for outdoor storage. Mr. Tapper said he would feel more comfortable offering flexibility, if the area was proposed to be paved, rather than the request for crushed concrete. Councilmember Gabler asked Mr. Flander to explain what type of business he has. Mr. Flander explained that they run a year-round landscaping business, including snow control for sites in the winter. He further stated that the need for crushed concrete rather an asphalt surface is because the heavy equipment maneuvering around the site that could damage that type of surface material. Councilmember Gabler asked what type of things would be stored outside. Mr. Flander said that it would be commercial equipment such as trailers and equipment accessories like skid loader attachments. Councilmember Gabler asked whether the need for that amount of outdoor storage is necessary for accessibility, rather than storage area itself. Mr. Flander emphasized that the intention is to develop the site initially so they can move the business to Monticello, with the expectation of an expansion of the building area in the future. Councilmember Gabler reiterated that she would be fine with a little flexibility on the amount of outdoor storage area allowed for the site, but it will ultimately come down to a decision being made by the Planning Commission. Mr. Tapper expressed concern about the potential precedent this type of flexibility would set for other potential developments in Monticello. Mr. Elam asked for clarification on whether parking vehicles in the proposed storage area is CO IJIUereu uuruuur storage or parking. ivis. SScnuniann c1aniieU tnat it the vehicles are parked in the area for longer than 24 hours at a time, the zoning ordinance would define it as outdoor storage. The surface of the area where the vehicles would be parked would factor into that as well. Mr. Tapper reiterated that his concern does not focus on the flexibility given for outdoor storage, but rather, what the Planning Commission reasoning for allowing this flexibility would be if the next applicant asked for the same. Councilmember Tracy Hinz asked what the alternative plan would be if 200% of outdoor storage compared to total building square footage was not allowed. Mr. Elam noted that it would make development of the site in this regard difficult, as the concept plan proposed was to eliminate any unnecessary storage space on the site. Councilmember Gabler asked how many employees Mr. Flander has, and where they would park on site. Mr. Flander said at current there are four employees, and they would park in the front parking lot area that would be surfaced with asphalt. Mayor Hilgart said in regard to the outdoor storage flexibility request to enhance the building design as much as possible. Public Comment Mike Mossey, 12777 Aetna Ave NE, Monticello, MN 55362, addressed the City Council, Planning Commission, and the public. Mr. Mossey noted that he did not have any concern for the amount of outdoor storage requested, but rather the material the outdoor storage is located on. He noted that dust control is a concern for the City on industrial sites, and crushed concrete would likely cause an issue with dust in that regard. If dust and other external impacts are a concern to the City, they should review whether the need for impervious surface in these areas is necessary. 3. Adiournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 5:52 p.m. Recorded By: Hayden Stensgard §3 Date Approved: February 6, 2024 ATTEST: Angela Schumao) C*�nunity Development Director CITY OF Vlontice_o June 20th, 2024 Re: Master Craft PUD City Planning File # 2024-19 General Comments PHONE:763-295-2711 FAx:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street I Suite 1 I Monticello, MN 55362 The City is not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. After review of the most recent land use application plans dated 06-03-24 for the proposed development in the City of Monticello, we have determined the following based on the 2020 MN State Fire Code: 1. The applicant will verify that all access drive spacing in the parking lots are at least 24ft wide for aerial apparatus access and circulation within this lot. The allowed decrease is from the required 26 feet width specified in Fire Code Appendix D105.2. 2. The applicant will verify and provide full turning radius in access roads for the City's aerial apparatus as required in Fire Code Appendix D103.3. 3. The city requires that you install a fire key box on the outside of your building. Please work with the Fire Inspector on this requirement. 4. If a fire suppression system is required, we require that you work with the Fire Chief/Fire Inspector on locating your Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system. The Fire Inspector must approve the location before it is installed. www.ci.monticello.mn.us � ciTv of __ � Vlontice_o PHONE:763-295-2711 FAx:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street I Suite 11 Monticello, MN 55362 5. Finally, if a fire suppression system is required, we are requiring hydrant spacing at 400 feet based on Fire Code Section 507.5.1 exception number 2. These items are subject to approval of the Monticello Fire Chief and Fire Inspector. This is a preliminary list of items that would need to be addressed. Sincerely, 4n Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator www.ci.monticello.mn.us CITY OF Mont e o June 24, 2024 Re: Mastercraft Concept City Project # 2023-46 OFFICE:763-295-2711 FAX:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 I Monticello, MN 55362 The Engineering Department has reviewed the Preliminary Plans dated 6/6/24 as prepared by Bogart Pederson and offers the following comments: General Comments 1. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) and SWPPP shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review prior to any construction if 1 acre or more will be disturbed. 2. Follow city Design manual for stormwater design, if 1 acre or more of new or fully reconstructed impervious is created a stormwater report will be required. 3. Tracer wire shall follow Appendix D of the Monticello specifications (httr)s://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/881/Appendix-D-Tracer- Wire) 4. The building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements when building plans are available. S. Streets, parking lots, and utilities shall be designed in accordance with the applicable City Subdivision Ordinances and the City's General Specifications and Standard Details Plates for Street and Utility Construction. 6. Plans shall include the required notes from the design manual #10 required notes on page 3(https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/121/Design-Manual--- Plan-Requirements-and-Design-Guidelines-PDF) 7. Show all easements on construction plan set. Future building appears to be encroaching into drainage easement. 8. Perimeter curb is required around the parking lot, ribbon curb is acceptable. 9. Provide pretreatment for infiltration basin (if basin is required) meeting MPCA requirements 10. Shift trees and fence from North property line to not obstruct drainage ditch. 11. ROW permit will be required when connecting to utilities across Fallon. Detour plan will be required to be submitted by contractor. 12. Provide pipe sizing calculations for storm pipe under parking lot. 13. It should be noted that future assessments are proposed for street and utility improvements along Fallon Ave in accordance with the City's assessment policy. The City is not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. www.ci.monticello.mn.us CITY OF OFFICE:763-295-2711 FAX:763-295-4404 Montice O 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 I Monticello, MN 55362 Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please contact the Engineering Department with any questions. Sincerely, Ryan Melhouse Assistant City Engineer www.ci.monticello.mn.us City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2K. Consideration to approve an Administrative Lot Combination and Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Permit for the Pointes at Cedar District for proposed Commercial Lodging and Restaurants as Principal Uses in the Populus Sub -District; Applicant: Ted Thompson o/b/o Monticello Hospitalitv Group LLC Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Stephen Grittman, Grittman Consulting, 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item City Planner Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City Administrator Assistant City Engineer, Chief Building Official ACTION REQUESTED Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Administrative Lot Combination and the Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Permit. Acting as the Board of Adjustment & Appeals, the Planning Commission also unanimously approved a Variance to the required setback for the proposed monument sign. No appeal from the public was received. The Planning Commission's decision on the Variance stands. Decision 1: Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-68 approving an Administrative Lot Combination, combining Lots 3 and 4, Deephaven 3 into a single parcel, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z and based on findings in said resolution. Decision 2: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2024-69 approving a Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage PCD Permit, including trail and public cross parking easement, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z and based on findings in said resolution. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Lots 3 & 4, Block 1, Deephaven 3 PID #: 155278001040and 155278001030 Planning Case Number: 2024-29 Request(s): 1. Administrative Lot Combination 2. Conditional Use Permit for Pointes at Cedar Development Stage Permit 3. Variance to setback, free-standing signage City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 Deadline for Decision: August 13, 2024 (60-day deadline) October 12, 2024 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: Commercial and Residential Flex Zoning Designation: PCD, Pointes at Cedar District Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: N/A Current Site Uses: Vacant Commercial Surrounding Land Uses: North: B-3 Commercial East: Commercial/Industrial South: Multi -Family Residential West: PCD Commercial Project Description: The applicant proposes a mixed commercial project on the subject property, consisting of a hotel, full -service restaurant complex (including meeting room space), and a quick -service restaurant facility on the west end of the building. All three business entities, though separate, are within a single attached building. The property consists of approximately 3.6 acres and is currently platted as two separate parcels. The applicants are also pursuing a combination of the lots into a single building site, a variance to the required minimum setback for a proposed free-standing monument sign, and a vacation of the internal drainage and utility easements as companion applications. The vacation of easements will be considered by Council following a public hearing. The proposed project is in the PCD, Pointes at Cedar Zoning District, which is designed to encourage a mix of residential and commercial uses. At the north and west boundaries of the district, commercial uses are expected to dominate. The proposed site sits at the northern boundary of the district, within the Populus sub -district of the PCD, at the intersection of Chelsea Road and Edmonson Avenue NE. As a component of the PCD zoning, the project is designed to coordinate with surrounding development for access, parking, and pedestrian systems related to the public spaces to be created in the district. The proposed project would gain its principal access from Chelsea Road on the north but will incorporate shared access from Edmonson with the adjoining multi -family project (Deephaven Apartments) and to Cedar Street via an existing internal private roadway. The project was presented at a joint Planning Commission/City Council Concept Review workshop in April. There was still some uncertainty at that meeting as to the extent and timing of the various component uses. Originally, the quick -service restaurant had not been included as an aspect of the project; however, there was additional undeveloped land at the west edge City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 of the site. The applicants have supplemented the Development Stage Permit plan by incorporating the quick -service restaurant into the combined building, adding some parking to the westerly portion of the property, and clarifying the development of a public trail component on the western -most edge of the site. Finally, the applicants included additional signage information in the Development Stage Permit material. The proposal includes a monument sign that will identify the hotel entrance from the Chelsea Road access point. This sign is proposed to be setback from the right of way approximately 6 feet, rather than the required 15 feet per City regulations. The applicants are seeking a variance for that proposed sign. The hotel would also rely on wall signage for broader identification, taking advantage of the proposed building height of four stories. The site users are also pursuing a potential option that would forgo separate freestanding signage in consideration of a Pointes at Cedar entry gateway, off -site at the southeast corner of Cedar Street and Chelsea Road. That concept could be incorporated into land that the City reserved from the original plat for purposes of entry monumentation for the Pointes project area. This concept is not fully developed, but if realized, the restaurants would otherwise rely on wall signage for identification. ANALYSIS The applicant proposed a concept of this project during a joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop in April of this year. Comments from Council, Commission, and staff were positive regarding land use and consistency with both Comprehensive Plan goals for the site, as well as the development expectations for the property. Development details were the primary feedback, along with adherence to the City's general zoning standards. PCD Land Uses and Design Requirements The Pointes at Cedar District was designed to create a flexible zoning approach based on the goals, objectives, and design direction included in the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. The Ordinance identifies the purpose of The Pointes at Cedar District as follows: The purpose of The Pointes at Cedar District (PCD) is to implement the goals, policies and specific design requirements of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan (SAP), a chapter of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. In accordance with the SAP, the PCD ordinance establishes three subdistricts. Each subdistrict with its specific uses and development expectations are clustered around a separate pool of The Pointes at Cedar lake and its public spaces. Each subdistrict's public and private improvements are intended to be developed in accordance with the City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 applicable "biome" concept as identified in The Pointes SAP. Architecture, landscape architecture, and all site elements are to be designed and constructed in consistency with the biome theme within which the site is located. The three subdistricts are: • Populus: Reflects Northern Minnesota coniferous forest areas • Tilia: Reflects Central Minnesota's Big Woods and more heavily populated/developed regions • Quercus: Reflects Southwestern Minnesota's prairie and oak savanna Project proposals must demonstrate how they advance the goals of the SAP and the PCD District as a precondition of successful consideration. A finding by the City Council that the proposed development activity is inconsistent with the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan (SAP), or with this Ordinance, is grounds for denial of any application for such development. It is the exclusive role of the City Council, with consideration of recommendation and analysis from various advisory bodies of the City, including City staff, to determine whether a development proposal reaches the requirement of consistency with The Pointes SAP and this ordinance. The proposed project lies within the Populus subdistrict of the PCD. Building materials and design, landscape components, and other features are required to reflect a northern Minnesota environment. The Pointes planning documents focus on a variety of commercial uses that support the vitality and use of the district, specifically including hospitality and similar uses that will both capitalize on, and contribute to, visits to the area. The proposed hotel and restaurant uses are well - aligned with the Pointes at Cedar intent and goals. In regard to site design, the project designers have chosen a variety of stone and wood timber building elements, alternative pavements, and a landscape that includes northern forest plant selections and boulder outcrops. Those building and site development components are consistent with the intent of the Northern (Populus) Biome. Development Stage Permit (CUP) Site Planning. The site plan relies on its principal access from Chelsea Road. The City Engineer provided comment on the configuration requirements of Chelsea Road as related to this access point. Additional access will come through a new, shared access drive along the south edge of City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 the property from Edmonson which will connect to both the parking areas for the proposed project. A Conditional Use Permit for cross access was previously granted with the platting of Deephaven 3 to allow the shared access between the Lot 1, Block 1 of Deephaven (multi -family lot) with the commercial lots platted as part of the Deephaven 3 plat. This access also connects with the internal driveway system that serves the Deephaven Apartments. That driveway system also provides westerly access to Cedar Street. The applicant will be required to verify and amend as necessary the existing cross access documents supporting the new legal descriptions of property. The site layout incorporates a single building with connected spaces for the 98-room hotel on the east, the full -service restaurant in the middle, and a quick -service restaurant at the west end of the building. There are no drive -through facilities planned for the project. Parking facilities and landscape areas for the project surround the building, which also includes a covered porte cochere area for the hotel entry. In conformance with The Points at Cedar's direction, the site plan includes patio seating areas on the south side of the hotel building, and along the north side of the restaurant complex. Pedestrian Access. The Development Stage plans show a public trail along the west boundary of the site, which will provide access from Cedar Street south through the Deephaven residential site, eventually leading to the public spaces planned as a part of the Pointes at Cedar development district. This trail is viewed as an important site plan enhancement, creating another connection point into the central Pointes area from both Chelsea Road and this project. A public easement is required to be executed to dedicate this connection. Sidewalk currently extends along Chelsea Road serving this project to the east and to the west. The plan shows additional required pedestrian facilities along Edmonson Avenue, which will extend to the south past Deephaven and to other areas of the PCD. The sidewalk is required to be constructed with this project. Under the development contract for Deephaven, the underlying property owner and developer of Deephaven is required to complete a half -street reconstruction of Edmonson Avenue no later than 2025, which shall include this sidewalk. Internally, the applicants provide connection to the Chelsea Road sidewalk through the porte cochere entry point, as well as to a southerly connection to the Deephaven site. Staff suggest an additional pedestrian connection to the public pathway on the west directly to the restaurant portion of the complex. Pedestrian or bicycle traffic from the west will otherwise cross through landscaped areas to access the restaurants and vice versa. Parking. The site plan was designed to provide a total of 235 parking spaces for the combined facility. The hotel parking requirement would be approximately 110 spaces, while the restaurant spaces (including the event space) would result in a demand of approximately 120 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 spaces, a total site requirement of 230 parking spaces. There will be some shared parking and overlap between the uses. As such, parking should be sufficient to serve the facility without concern for overflow issues. In addition to the private cross access agreements noted earlier, the PCD zoning district requires that all parking be shared with the public. The applicant is required to execute a shared public parking and access easement for the parking on site. Landscape. The applicants provided a landscape plan that includes significant planted spaces surrounding the hotel site which are consistent with the species expectations for the Populus sub -district of the PCD, as well as the use of boulder and stone accents in the landscape and on the building, and material accents such as wood timbers that complement the intent of the PCD for this area. The site includes some perimeter tree planting, but two areas of the plan would benefit from additional focus. The plans show a continuously paved area in front of the restaurant complex with no green spaces or planting areas. A portion of that space is devoted to patio seating; however, the bulk of the space is pavement only. This area should be considered for additional planting. Staff recommend introducing some pine tree planting sites, particularly red pine and white pine, reflecting the northern Minnesota biome, and complementing the theme of the restaurant. In addition, incorporating the boulder accents proposed for the hotel building area would further the general themes of the district. The second area that should receive additional attention is the south boundary where the parking field adjoins the Deephaven Apartments' parking. This area shows no planting but should be supplemented with buffering landscape. Pine and Spruce trees, as shown in other areas of the site, would help enhance this edge, and create a buffer between the active commercial and residential land uses. Finally, staff recommend that some of the species shrub selections for the entire site include more evergreens to add both winter interest and variety. The plan shows just six arborvitae shrubs on the site. Juniper varieties would be a suitable additional shrub selection for the area. As a project within The Pointes, ongoing compliance and maintenance with the approved landscaping plan will be a condition of approval. Building Design/Materials. Building materials for the hotel -meeting -restaurant complex are consistent with the City's architectural and materials requirements, and with similar commercial buildings found in other areas. The applicants have proposed the use of colors and materials on both portions of the combined structure that are consistent with the intent of the PCD and this northern biome subdistrict. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 There is a notable use of timber and stone that is well suited to the PCD requirements, and the addition of boulders and landscape materials noted above should be fully consistent with the zoning district expectations. The applicant did not provide rear and side elevations for the restaurant area of the building. The applicant is required to provide updated elevations as a condition of approval. These elevations are to be consistent with the materials and detailing required for the Populus sub -district. Further, the elevation drawings are required to be updated to detail material specifications in compliance with the PCD ordinance. A trash enclosure is shown at the rear of the restaurant area. No detail was provided for the enclosure. Detail for the enclosure demonstrating compliance with code requirements and the building materials is a condition of approval. Floor Area Ratio. The desire to increase the floor area ratio was noted at the concept review. The applicants increased the floor area ratio for the site with the addition of the quick -service restaurant. The PCD includes FAR (Floor Area Ratio) requirements for commercial uses in the Pointes at Cedar. The FAR requirements vary by location (park/lake frontage v. district exterior frontage), and by building type (single-, two, or three+ -story buildings). In addition, the district accommodates a plan -specific determination for mixed use projects in the PCD. In this case, the subject property is a component of the Deephaven plat development, which initially created the residential project south of this site and reserved the Cedar and Chelsea frontage sites for commercial use. With a mix of single- and multi -story buildings on this site, the FAR is calculated as an average. The Pointes at Cedar District permits the City to factor in the mixed -use design to establish the FAR for this project. With that flexibility, the FAR will be set by the Development Stage permit. Staff finds the FAR for this project to be consistent with the intent for development within the Pointes, especially given the uses for this site, which are directly supported by the SAP and zoning. Signage/Setback Variance. Planning Commission approved the proposed Variance to sign setback noted below. For the hotel, a single monument sign is proposed in terms of free-standing signage. The applicants are seeking a variance to accommodate a lesser setback than the current 15-foot setback from property line. The applicants proposed a modest monument sign at the primary Chelsea Road entrance, with a setback of approximately 6 feet. The proposed sign is shown conceptually, at approximately 8 feet in height and 12 feet in width — 96 square feet for the entire structure, including the base. To meet the 15-foot setback, the back edge of the sign would extend into the circulation/driveway area — even though the proposed sign is not out of character for commercial signage. Moreover, it would be entirely obscured from view by parked vehicles and landscaping. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 When considering variances, the City is required to find that there are unique circumstances on the subject property that interfere with putting the property to reasonable use. In the case of signage, reasonable use is effective visibility and communication with passing traffic. The City's signage objectives are favorably skewed toward monument signage, rather than individual pole or similar freestanding signs. However, the configuration of the site for a monument sign meeting the required setback would defeat this objective. Staff supports the variance for this purpose, and indeed would support an amendment that permits monument signs to be located closer to the front property lines, as this applicant's sign is proposed. For free-standing signage for the restaurant, there is a consideration for accommodating an off - site gateway identification as a part of the Pointes at Cedar development area. This concept is not yet fully realized but could facilitate better sign visibility for the restaurant proposal. For commercial buildings in the PCD, wall signs are the preferred sign display method. The hotel illustrates wall signs near the top of the four-story building, all well below the standard maximum allowance. Additional sign detail will be required for both the full -service and quick - service restaurants, to be compliant with the zoning ordinance and Pointes at Cedar requirements. Lighting. Additional lighting information is required as a condition of Development Stage PCD approval. Particularly sensitive will be lighting of the building and parking areas adjacent to the residential uses to the south and compliance with PCD zoning standards. Lot Combination The applicant proposes to combine the existing Lots 3 and 4 of the plat of Deephaven 3 into a single development parcel. As fully compliant existing lots of record, the applicant is requesting an administrative lot combination rather than plat. Such combinations are allowed as exceptions to platting under the City's subdivision ordinance. Staff believes the combination is acceptable, subject to the comments and acceptance by Wright County for recording. To facilitate the combination, the property owner requested the City vacate the drainage and utility easement lying along the lot line between the two parcels, leaving the perimeter easements in place. Budget Impact: The applicant submitted the required fees and escrows associated with the review and public notice for the applications. The escrow will be used to cover the review costs of consulting staff. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff involved with the review of the application include members of Development Services and the consulting City Planner. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The proposed project meets the Monticello 2040 Vison + Plan goals for supporting Business Attraction and Retention and Tax Base Expansion. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 The proposed uses directly align with the vision and uses established for The Pointes at Cedar, which is adopted as an appendix of the 2040 Plan. The uses will enhance and further the hospitality and recreational experience expected at The Pointes. Further, the proposed uses fill a demonstrated need within the community, as evidenced in the most recent Hospitality Study completed for the community. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and held a public hearing on the item during its regular meeting on July 2, 2024. During their discussion, the Commission confirmed the location of access points, including shared access. It confirmed that access from Chelsea is a standard access width, and both left and right movements will be permitted. It was also confirmed that there is more than enough parking on the site to accommodate the uses proposed. The Commission concurred that the 15' setback for a monument should be reviewed for a possible amendment and agreed that the developer's proposed sign location was appropriate. The Commission verified that the developers of the Deephaven apartments are required to complete the half street improvements to Edmonson as part of their development agreement. Staff confirmed and indicated that the sidewalk is required as part of this development and those improvements. Ted Thompson, Good Neighbor Development and applicant, addressed the Commission. Mr. Thompson indicated his excitement for the district and project itself. He confirmed that he understands the conditions in Exhibit Z and understood the required cross easements. The Commission expressed support for the project and noted it is well suited to The Pointes at Cedar. Following discussion, the Commission recommended approval of the two decisions for administrative lot combination and development stage permit. The Commission also approved the variance request for setback. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommend approval of the Development Stage PCD Permit. The proposed uses are in direct alignment with The Pointes at Cedar District and the site and building plans are consistent with expectations for the PCD, providing landscaping, patio and pedestrian enhancements to reflect PCD requirements. Staff's recommendation is contingent on compliance with the conditions in Exhibit Z. Staff added conditions for the required encroachment and stormwater maintenance agreements since the time of the Planning Commission review. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 SUPPORTING DATA A B. C. D E. F. G H J. K. L. M N. O. P. Q• R. S. T. Z. Resolution 2024-68 — Administrative Lot Combination Resolution 2024-69 — CUP for Development Stage Permit Resolution PC-2024-029, Administrative Lot Combination Resolution PC-2024-30, Conditional Use Permit for PCD Development Stage Permit Aerial Site Image Applicant Narrative Certificate of Survey and Lot Combination Exhibit Plans, Including: a. Site Plan b. Preliminary Floor Plans c. Exterior Renderings d. Hotel Exterior Elevations e. Exterior Materials Description Civil Plans, Including: a. Civil Plan b. Standard Notes & Specifications c. Standard Details d. Grading Plan e. SWPPP f. Utility Plan g. Paving Plan Stormwater Report Monument Sign Detail Plat of Deephaven 3 Excerpts, Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan and Zoning Ordinance Excerpts, Subdivision Ordinance Concept Stage Review Minutes City Engineer's Letter, dated June 27, 2024 City Building Official's Letter, dated June 20, 2024 Trail Easement, Draft Parking Cross Easement, Draft Resolution PC-2024-31, Variance to Sign Setback Conditions of Approval City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Permit Lots 3 and 4, Deephaven 3 1. Provide and execute an easement for public access over the trail along the west boundary of the site. 2. Provide and execute an easement for public parking and access over the site parking areas. 3. Revise certificate of survey to illustrate structures and improvements in relationship to easements; provide and execute an encroachment agreement for the improvements encroaching into existing public drainage and utility easements. (Added condition by staff.) 4. Provide and execute a stormwater maintenance agreement. (Added condition by staff.) 5. Amend and execute as required any required cross -access and cross -parking agreements required for the site and adjoining parcels. 6. Provide updated elevation plans for the full extent of the building which include all facades, details all materials, and which are consistent with the materials requirements of The Pointes at Cedar District. 7. Provide additional signage detail regarding the proposed monument sign at the Chelsea entrance. 8. No freestanding (pole -mounted) signs shall be allowed on the site related to the hotel project. 9. Continue to work with the City on development of a common entry gateway incorporating identification signage for businesses in the district. 10. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional planting in the front paved areas of the restaurant portion of the building, with a focus on red and white pine plantings 11. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional evergreen shrub plantings throughout the site. 12. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional pine and spruce tree plantings along the south boundary of the site to buffer the commercial parking areas from the Deephaven residential site. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 13. Supplement the landscaping plan with the use of boulders in the restaurant areas, similar to those on the hotel side of the site. 14. Continued and on -going compliance with the approved landscaping plan is required. 15. Add a pedestrian connection from the public trail/sidewalk to the restaurant side of the facility. 16. Complete the pedestrian path along Edmonson per City requirements. 17. Provide detail for the trash enclosure; the enclosure materials are required to be consistent with the building materials. 18. Provide lighting plans and specifications consistent with The Pointes at Cedar ordinance. 19. The administrative lot combination is subject to review and recording by Wright County. Should the County decline the combination, a plat will be required. 20. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff letter dated June 27, 2024. 21. Compliance with the terms of the City Building Official's letter dated June 20, 2024. 22. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-68 APPROVAL OF A AN ADMINISTRATIVE LOT COMBINATION LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, DEEPHAVEN 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking development approval in the Pointes at Cedar District, among other concurrent applications, for two parcels of currently undeveloped land; and WHEREAS, the proposed development would incorporate opportunity for hospitality and related commercial uses and directly associated accessory uses as allowed in the proposed Pointes at Cedar zoning district; and WHEREAS, the subject property encompasses two platted parcels of land in the same plat; and WHEREAS, the combination of the lots facilitates a more cohesive development; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial - Residential Flex; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Administrative Combination pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2nd, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the Administrative Lot Combination; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-68 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PCD, Pointes at Cedar District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan and the Points at Cedar Small Area Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed development accommodates additional public and private improvements, including pedestrian facilities, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed development accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details, as supplemented in further submissions, meet the intent and requirements of the applicable subdivision regulations. 7. The proposed PCD Development Stage Permit is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the development will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Monticello City Council approves the Administrative Lot Combination, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. Provide an easement for public access over the trail along the west boundary of the site. 2. Provide an easement for public parking and access over the site parking areas. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-68 3. Amend and execute as required any required cross -access and cross -parking agreements required for the site and adjoining parcels. 4. Provide updated elevation plans for the full extent of the building which include all facades, details all materials, and which are consistent with the materials requirements of The Pointes at Cedar District. 5. Provide additional signage detail regarding the proposed monument sign at the Chelsea entrance. 6. No freestanding (pole -mounted) signs shall be allowed on the site related to the hotel project. 7. Continue to work with the City on development of a common entry gateway incorporating identification signage for businesses in the district. 8. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional planting in the front paved areas of the restaurant portion of the building, with a focus on red and white pine plantings. 9. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional evergreen shrub plantings throughout the site. 10. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional pine and spruce tree plantings along the south boundary of the site to buffer the commercial parking areas from the Deephaven residential site. 11. Supplement the landscaping plan with the use of boulders in the restaurant areas, similar to those on the hotel side of the site. 12. Continued and on -going compliance with the approved landscaping plan is required. 13. Add a pedestrian connection from the public trail/sidewalk to the restaurant side of the facility. 14. Complete the pedestrian path along Edmonson per City requirements. 15. Provide detail for the trash enclosure; the enclosure materials are required to be consistent with the building materials. 16. Provide lighting plans and specifications consistent with The Pointes at Cedar ordinance. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-68 17. The administrative lot combination is subject to review and recording by Wright County. Should the County decline the combination, a plat will be required. 18. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff letter dated June 27, 2024. 19. Compliance with the terms of the City Building Official's letter dated June 20, 2024. 20. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 22nd day of July, 2024 by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL -32 01■111.111 Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-69 APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT STAGE APPROVAL IN THE POINTES AT CEDAR DISTRICT LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, DEEPHAVEN 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Development Stage Permit approval in the Pointes at Cedar District, among other concurrent applications, for of currently undeveloped land; and WHEREAS, the proposed development would incorporate opportunity for hospitality and related commercial uses and directly associated accessory uses as allowed in the Pointes at Cedar zoning district; and WHEREAS, the PCD provides for a hotel and restaurant business uses, on a single development parcel, and utilizes existing right of way for access to and from the PCD business(es); and WHEREAS, the PCD incorporates a series of development standards that the applicant will meet with the submitted, or supplemental, plans and documents; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial - Residential Flex; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PCD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2"d, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the Planning Commission resolution recommending approval; and CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-69 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the Conditional use Permit for Development Stage Permit; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval; and 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PCD, Pointes at Cedar District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan and The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed development accommodates additional public and private improvements, including pedestrian facilities, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed development accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details, as supplemented in further submissions, meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 7. The proposed PCD Development Stage Permit is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the development will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Monticello City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Permit for Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Deephaven 3,d Addition, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-69 1. Provide an easement for public access over the trail along the west boundary of the site. 2. Provide an easement for public parking and access over the site parking areas. 3. Amend and execute as required any required cross -access and cross -parking agreements required for the site and adjoining parcels. 4. Provide updated elevation plans for the full extent of the building which include all facades, details all materials, and which are consistent with the materials requirements of The Pointes at Cedar District. 5. Provide additional signage detail regarding the proposed monument sign at the Chelsea entrance. 6. No freestanding (pole -mounted) signs shall be allowed on the site related to the hotel project. 7. Continue to work with the City on development of a common entry gateway incorporating identification signage for businesses in the district. 8. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional planting in the front paved areas of the restaurant portion of the building, with a focus on red and white pine plantings. 9. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional evergreen shrub plantings throughout the site. 10. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional pine and spruce tree plantings along the south boundary of the site to buffer the commercial parking areas from the Deephaven residential site. 11. Supplement the landscaping plan with the use of boulders in the restaurant areas, similar to those on the hotel side of the site. 12. Continued and on -going compliance with the approved landscaping plan is required. 13. Add a pedestrian connection from the public trail/sidewalk to the restaurant side of the facility. 14. Complete the pedestrian path along Edmonson per City requirements. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-69 15. Provide detail for the trash enclosure; the enclosure materials are required to be consistent with the building materials. 16. Provide lighting plans and specifications consistent with The Pointes at Cedar ordinance. 17. The administrative lot combination is subject to review and recording by Wright County. Should the County decline the combination, a plat will be required. 18. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff letter dated June 27, 2024. 19. Compliance with the terms of the City Building Official's letter dated June 20, 2024. 20. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 22nd day of July, 2024 by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL :a ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-29 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A AN ADMINISTRATIVE LOT COMBINATION LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, DEEPHAVEN 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking development approval in the Pointes at Cedar District, among other concurrent applications, for two parcels of currently undeveloped land; and WHEREAS, the proposed development would incorporate opportunity for hospitality and related commercial uses and directly associated accessory uses as allowed in the proposed Pointes at Cedar zoning district; and WHEREAS, the subject property encompasses two platted parcels of land in the same plat; and WHEREAS, the combination of the lots facilitates a more cohesive development; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial -Residential Flex; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Administrative Combination pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2nd, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PCD, Pointes at Cedar District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan and the Points at Cedar Small Area Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed development accommodates additional public and private improvements, including pedestrian facilities, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed development accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details, as supplemented in further submissions, meet the intent and requirements of the applicable subdivision regulations. 7. The proposed PCD Development Stage Permit is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the development will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use, and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the proposed Administrative Lot Combination be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. Provide an easement for public access over the trail along the west boundary of the site. 2. Provide an easement for public parking and access over the site parking areas. 3. Amend and execute as required any required cross -access and cross -parking agreements required for the site and adjoining parcels. 4. Provide updated elevation plans for the full extent of the building which include all facades, details all materials, and which are consistent with the materials requirements of The Pointes at Cedar District. 5. Provide additional signage detail regarding the proposed monument sign at the Chelsea entrance. 6. No freestanding (pole -mounted) signs shall be allowed on the site related to the hotel project. 7. Continue to work with the City on development of a common entry gateway incorporating identification signage for businesses in the district. 8. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional planting in the front paved areas of the restaurant portion of the building, with a focus on red and white pine plantings. 9. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional evergreen shrub plantings throughout the site. 10. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional pine and spruce tree plantings along the south boundary of the site to buffer the commercial parking areas from the Deephaven residential site. 11. Supplement the landscaping plan with the use of boulders in the restaurant areas, similar to those on the hotel side of the site. 12. Continued and on -going compliance with the approved landscaping plan is required. 13. Add a pedestrian connection from the public trail/sidewalk to the restaurant side of the facility. 14. Complete the pedestrian path along Edmonson per City requirements. 15. Provide detail for the trash enclosure; the enclosure materials are required to be consistent with the building materials. 16. Provide lighting plans and specifications consistent with The Pointes at Cedar ordinance. 17. The administrative lot combination is subject to review and recording by Wright County. Should the County decline the combination, a plat will be required. 18. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff letter dated June 27, 2024. 19. Compliance with the terms of the City Building Official's letter dated June 20, 2024. 20. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION -o By: Andrew Tapper, Vice -Chair ATTEST: i Angela Schuman ommunity Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2024-30 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT STAGE APPROVAL IN THE POINTES AT CEDAR DISTRICT LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, DEEPHAVEN 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Development Stage Permit approval in the Pointes at Cedar District, among other concurrent applications, for of currently undeveloped land; and WHEREAS, the proposed development would incorporate opportunity for hospitality and related commercial uses and directly associated accessory uses as allowed in the Pointes at Cedar zoning district; and WHEREAS, the PCD provides for a hotel and restaurant business uses, on a single development parcel, and utilizes existing right of way for access to and from the PCD business(es); and WHEREAS, the PCD incorporates a series of development standards that the applicant will meet with the submitted, or supplemental, plans and documents; and WHEREAS, the subject property will be developed under the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which designate the land use for the property as Commercial -Residential Flex; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the Development Stage PCD pursuant to the regulations of the applicable ordinances and land use plans and policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2nd, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution, and make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the PCD, Pointes at Cedar District. 2. The proposed uses will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located, including the Monticello Comprehensive Plan and The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by the existing and future land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The proposed development accommodates additional public and private improvements, including pedestrian facilities, utilities, and stormwater controls that ensure the project will continue to be consistent with the City's long-term public service infrastructure. 5. The proposed development accommodates reasonable extensions of development and infrastructure to serve other undeveloped property in the area. 6. The proposed access and development details, as supplemented in further submissions, meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 7. The proposed PCD Development Stage Permit is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding residential properties. 8. Approval of the development will not result in the need for additional road or utility infrastructure other than that being provided by and for the proposed use and should not otherwise negatively impact the health or safety of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the proposed Development Stage Permit be approved, subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report, as follows: 1. Provide an easement for public access over the trail along the west boundary of the site. 2. Provide an easement for public parking and access over the site parking areas. 3. Amend and execute as required any required cross -access and cross -parking agreements required for the site and adjoining parcels. 4. Provide updated elevation plans for the full extent of the building which include all facades, details all materials, and which are consistent with the materials requirements of The Pointes at Cedar District. 5. Provide additional signage detail regarding the proposed monument sign at the Chelsea entrance. 6. No freestanding (pole -mounted) signs shall be allowed on the site related to the hotel project. 7. Continue to work with the City on development of a common entry gateway incorporating identification signage for businesses in the district. 8. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional planting in the front paved areas of the restaurant portion of the building, with a focus on red and white pine plantings. 9. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional evergreen shrub plantings throughout the site. 10. Supplement the landscaping plan with additional pine and spruce tree plantings along the south boundary of the site to buffer the commercial parking areas from the Deephaven residential site. 11. Supplement the landscaping plan with the use of boulders in the restaurant areas, similar to those on the hotel side of the site. 12. Continued and on -going compliance with the approved landscaping plan is required. 13. Add a pedestrian connection from the public trail/sidewalk to the restaurant side of the facility. 14. Complete the pedestrian path along Edmonson per City requirements. 15. Provide detail for the trash enclosure; the enclosure materials are required to be consistent with the building materials. 16. Provide lighting plans and specifications consistent with The Pointes at Cedar ordinance. 17. The administrative lot combination is subject to review and recording by Wright County. Should the County decline the combination, a plat will be required. 18. Compliance with the terms of the City's Engineering Staff letter dated June 27, 2024. 19. Compliance with the terms of the City Building Official's letter dated June 20, 2024. 20. Comments and recommendations of other Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 2024 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: An� By: Andrew Tapper, Vice -Chair nunity Development Director Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Permit PID: 155-278-001030, 155-278-001040 Lots 3 & 4, Blk 1 Deephaven 3 Created by: City of Monticello Fairfield Inn and Suites City of Monticello Pointes at Cedar Submittal Lot Combination Submital EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GoodNeighbor Properties is excited to propose the development of a 98 room Fairfield Inn and Suites and a Branded 130 seat Restaurant on property in The Pointes at Cedar District. The hotel's owner, Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC., will bring Monticello its first Marriott brand hotel. The four-story hotel will feature 98 rooms, an indoor pool, meeting space, exercise area, and breakfast dining space for guests. The Hotel project will be situated on the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Chelsea Road and Edmonson Ave. Launched in 1987, Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott is designed for today's traveler who is looking to be productive on the road, whether for business or leisure. In addition to complimentary Wi-Fi and breakfast, Fairfield Inn & Suites offers thoughtfully designed rooms and suites that provide separate living, working, and sleeping areas. With more than 700 properties throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico, Fairfield Inn & Suites hotels participate in the award -winning Marriott Rewards' frequent travel program that allows members to earn hotel points or airline miles for every dollar spent during each stay. Fairfield Inn's rustic roots are a perfect fit for the Pointes at Cedar Populus District. The development team has worked at length with Marriott to make subtle tweaks to exterior design to fully embrace the "Up North" feel of the Populus District by including the following building elements and exterior finishes: • Modification of Porte Cochere design to include glulam timber structural elements • Use of stone accent walls near entrances • Incorporating stone outcroppings in landscape elements • Use of Coniferous plantings as well as Aspen species for tree plantings • Adjacent restaurant development also utilizes natural stone elements on building exterior as well as a Timber Frame structure at entrance and patio area. PROJECT CONTACTS Owner/Developmer: Rob Thompson Ted Christianson Monticello Hospitality Group - Managing Member Monticello Hospitality Group - Managing Member rob.thompson@gnproperties.net ted.christianson@gnproperties.net 612-812-1563 701-361-3734 AEC Team Cl Construction — Developer/CM/Owner Rep Ted Thompson - Project Executive - ted.thompsonaa ciconstruction.com Tanek — Architectural Ken Piper - Principle - kpiper@tanek.com Tim VanHouten - Project Manager - tvanhouten@tanek.com Elisa Richardson - Project Architect - erichardson@tanek.com Schultz Engineering and Site Design - Civil Brian Schultz - Professional Civil Engineer - schultzeng@live.com ERA Structural Engineering —Structural Matt Kahle - Client Lead - mkahle@eraeng.com Michaud Cooley Erickson — MEP Thomas Torborg - Project Manager - ttorborg@michaudcooley.com We kindly thank the City of Monticello for their attention to our submission. We look forward to delivering a development that makes the community proud and brings positive synergy with the surrounding developments and local businesses. Respectfully, Rob Thompson and Ted Christianson GoodNeighbor Properties , , , , , , , , CHELSEA ROAD W cr_ \ , I ceft a zz 'L= 01'56' 11" S 88'47' 24" W 643.05 ---- L= 23.59 -- 396.88 --- I - - - R= 698 00 , 246.17 , i 139.00 I I ---------------------- — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — —\ 65.32 `�'� 3p------------- -------------------- I — — \ ----- -W_ I — — —\`— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —j I I I- \ o L- - - - - - - I c - - - --. Drainage 8t Utility Easement - � - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _LA I I \ \\ I i-----------1 I ----------------------------- I ; ''•.---- N 88°4T 24' E 139.00 I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1°I ,00 I I I oa I I I I I I I I I I Oi IN II =� o l I Existing PID: 155-278 001030 o Existing PID: 155-278-001040 II 8 I ' I > I I �Z I I � I I Zi 1 c I I I I v I I I 1 I � I UJ I I I I I I � c 20 foot wide Permanent Easement 1 11 1 1 1 for drainage and utility purposes t per Doc. No. 697451 \ \ I I 1------------------------ 100 /Not tangent ----L--- -J 1-------�---� -- -- ----------------- -----------------------------------------I 1 275.81 I --.. ---- 420.47 C Ln N 88°40' 21" E 696.28 ---- I "' I • --------------C,, I O ,-Ingress and Egress Easement per Doc. No 1433685 I I I I M I I I I I I I I S I Q -----------------------#---------r - I I I Z �' I 1 I I I I I I Z I I I V PROPERTY BOUNDARY MONUMENT LEGEND Legal Description I I p I O SET IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED "DELEO 40341" Lots 3 Et 4, Block 1, DEEPHAVEN 3, Wright County, Minnesota. 20 Drainage and utility easements as dedicated • FOUND IRON MONUMENT I I 83 on the underlying plat are shown thus: I I Rear lot line I I Ll ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE WRIGHT COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83 (2007 ADJ.) N N 66 Side' lot I I line -N _J 66I- Public way Being six feet in width and adjoining side lot lines and being 12 feet in width and adjoining public ways and rear lot lines, unless otherwise indicated on this plat. 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET rNO. REVISIONS SINCE INITIAL DATE OF DATE CHELSEA ROAD 1120/ndustna/Park Road I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY, OR REPORT \ 2Bralneo 18-8 9-MN564o1 WAS PREPARED BY DULY OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 218F295333 AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 13No > UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. St. Cloud, MNN 56303 6303 320-259K__�L-1266 Property Boundary Survey KRAMER LEAS DELEO C.I. Construction SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING Signature: �a,u� /(�l%G°c 04/01 /2024 PIDs• 155-278-001030 Et 155-278-001040 B R A I N E R D S T. C L O U D Samuel J. DeLeo, MN License No. 40341 Date ' City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota PROJECT N 0 . C I C O N 2 4 01 Located in Section 14, Township 121 North, Range 25 West 1rp --- -------- V V .�.� ss > — —� _ » >> CI ELSEA ROAD " " >> SS F•> �� ST U C \\\\\�� --_--------------- V > ' — -— A \ _ A b — ..... — - SS .. W 643.05 ' 24b:N� ------------------------___--------,, \ --- I --- 139.00 --- ,'-- �' — -- ---— — — — — — — — — — — — — -----------—— — — — — —\ 65.32 1 3 ----- _----------T - I \ [' r( [ l l r } l l RIM= 959.08 / I \ \ I- ST I �I � i i I 1 1 i ii �i -i 11 z '' INV= 951.25 I 11I111111I111 1 11111 \ --RIM= 959.141 ��� Iti i 4 i i i 4 i i-�i�-i_II� i f i i i� j \ � ----- ----- � 962 � I \ _ I \ I , _ -INV= 953.06----------------- -- - - - -- — _ _ _ _- - - - - - - - - - - - - - NIV= 959.38 I 111 �`\ �t. ------ N88°4T24'E 139.00 1 ----------------------------- U Future sewer I 1 1 11 -4 \ 1\ - - _ _ , , , I I Existing drainage ST ' . _ _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ , and utility easement I — Z96;,-- b \ � 1 II 0; / I oo \ 1 0 1 I I - -- A I n V li C) �, I �, ' ` I /I C,4 I I / 1 en tJ \ I , \ r �I c I I 1 \ Existing PID: 155-278-001030' �r♦ I i 1 I I I I 1 1 I c g I Ex�sting PID. 155-278-001040 I , I 1 1 , I IZ, I , 1 I I I I ................ . � I \ I L I ...} :. . • x'•. I� � \ _ \\ a Future sewer✓I �� I � I ST I \\ , - /i ,' i - 20 foot wide Per nanent Easement \` -- I -I - for drainage and utility purposesRIM= 964.01 Future sewer RIM- 965.59 RIM= 964.82 per Doc. No. 69 51 INV E/W= 950.12RIM- 964.24 RIM_ 964.21 INV-953.99 INV E/W-95169 RIM- 964.07 -I 9INV= 958.14 INV= 952.61 INVS=952.6Future sewer V96 INVS-51.12 _ < ST -----------100 - - - - -- —N t n\< - - - - - - - -------------- ST » --J — — — — -------� ' 275.81 I I ---- - 420.47 a> \ >> »---------------------- ----- i b i - I "' I I ---- M 88°40' 21" E i:96.28 Mi _� I i I Ingress and Eiress Easement / I I I I I V ' - I A / IA\ SOT I I I I Z 1 .....«.... ... OLegal Descriptions Existing PID: 155-278-001030 - 20- - ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE WRIGHT COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83 (2007 ADJ.) 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 1�� Drainage and utility easements as dedicated Lot 3, Block 1, DEEPHAVEN 3, according to the I I 83 on the underlying plat are shown thus: PROPERTY BOUNDARY MONUMENT LEGEND recorded plat thereof, Wright County, I I Rear lot line Minnesota. O SET IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED "DELEO 40341" N N 66 Side' lot I I line —N _J 6I- N Public way Being six feet in width and adjoining side lot lines and being 12 feet in width and adjoining public ways and rear lot lines, unless otherwise indicated on this plat. Existing PID: 155-278-001040 Lot 4, Block 1, DEEPHAVEN 3, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Proposed Description for Combined Lots: Lot 3 and Lot 4, Block 1, DEEPHAVEN 3, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. • FOUND IRON MONUMENT NO. REVISIONS SINCE INITIAL DATE OF CHELSEA ROAD DATE MN 1120/nd Park Road eralrrera; MN5sao1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY, REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY � 218-8295333 AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR St. Cloua; MN 56303 _ 7. NorCloud, MN 6303 320-259-1288 UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Survey to Combine Lots — � KRAMER LEAS DELEO � // 6/25/2024 C.I. Construction o SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING Signature: �alr�u�/((G°c PI Ds: 155-278-001030 Et 155-278-001040 Z B R A I N E R D S T. CLOUD Samuel J. DeLeo, MN License No. 40341 Date City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota +, PROJECT N 0 . C I C O N 2 4 0 2 Located in Section 14, Township 121 North, Range 25 West / SITE AND 5UILDING INFOfRMATION SIZE PERCENTAGE OF NOTES SITE TOTAL SITE AREA 15i,389 SQ FT IMPERVIOUS = 130051 SQ. FT. * 83.1% PERVIOUS 26,538 SQ. FT. = 16.910 NOTE: Ndr fBERS MAY CHANGE SLIGHTLY AS SIDEWALKS ARE FIN,41-ImD BUILDING SIZE PERCENTAGE OF FLOORS SITE BUILDING HOTEL 15,501 SQ. FT. 9290 4 FLOORS FOOTPRINTS RESTAURANTS ll,nl SQ. FT. 12% 1 FLOOR LINK 342 5a FT. 02% 1 FLOOR TOTAL 21,140 SQ. FT. 112% g A - SITE LIGHTING POLE FIXTURE 0 I. I 30 0 .. • - EXIST 1 RTY LINE TRAN =— � � •. •I � �_F 'PROPE_ _ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W . c� . W�. W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w�}. .. W W W W W W W W W . �A . . . .8� . �� . ` . _ MONUMENT' '-O''AiINC� . `8A _ - . —SICK 11. 12 WW�y W z z N _ 235 PARKING STALLS (8 of WHICH ARE p L � Wo W 18 a ADA ACCESSIBLE) ° I—� , ` W (L tr m j 't a. � O C. W W. 24 j j j HOTEL DROP-OFFI 7A.' 9 W ORTE COCHERE ,10 W > 1 I I 30 I 2®0 II � I. r + \' QQ � L„( 1�IIII 2®I0II 24I'0II24I-0ILT � W d yy lie lie Olt 2V" -0 RESTAURANTS HOWL ' ✓� — 0 W 1-STORY IBUILDING 4-STORY BUILDING APPROX. 201-011 IN I -EIGHT I[XIT APPROX. 54'-011 IN HEIGHT IIA33 SQ FT FOOTPRINT Y LINE %9 ALL -MOUNTED 98-ROOMST TO -PROPER W ' 114'-1" # SIGN, LVL 04 15,501 SQ FT FOOTPRINT TO PROPEPT 'LINE >� •,I till 11 JJII W 17 oW _.� W a a WJ �W 3i6'-�II {v TO PROPERTY LINE O w o W ' 0.9 lk 10 ) © WOTE -.�. 0-1PARKI G.LM I TilC CK — a,�.W.W-,.W.W".'." W.W. •� - — N EASEMENT FOR SHARIED ACCESS WITH / . �PAARl'I'1ENT COM♦^LIX X---1 u EXISTING APARTMENT IBUILDING n u 'X EXISTING APARTMENT IBUILDING 0 0 fur I'D-.I. C 0 N ST R U C-T I G-Nl, DEVELOP I DESIGN I MANAGE I 1910 42nd Avenue W, Suite 300 Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 ciconstruction.com 320.763.2889 THIS SET OF PLANS IS THE PROPERTY OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. IT HAS BEEN ISSUED AS A CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE. COPY OR DUPLICATION OF ANY PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. At 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com REVISIONS NO. DESCRIPTION Monticello Hotel site plan DATE Date June 3, 2024 Drawn by TVH / ER 1 SITE PLAN a011 III z MI —/III aOl 1 N O N O •L Scale as noted Q 0 U I - T JERSEY MIKES 1 _— — — — — — II n— � II n— 4 n— � II n— � II nII n II II II II II II II II II II II III VESTIBULE II II II II OUPOPR DIVING II II II II = - = II II II II I I II II II II II JI- Jl-JL- JL- IL -II- JI- Jl -JL --L -ILA T T VESTIBULE 7 NO — W------ =—=—� II II1 VESTIBULE T T T ''.... I EVENT CENTER BAR DINING ROOM KITCHEN I J _ JAR L -J uNISE ISE STORAGE — J ® �—t 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 FIRST FLOOR RE,5TAURANT PLAN (EVENT CENTER + BOULDER TAP DOUSE + JERSEY MIKES) a100 1/16" = V-0" I I PORT COCHERE I I I I I I I I I I I I° s Mill F -AeSTOULE Ll ZO — an 0=1 STOP, 0 I� MARKET — J _ 000 wow � ® �� EV. 0 `� � L LOBBY ROOM _11 1 STOP, 0 T —_ 1 O Ea< f ��� LAUNDRY — — i?EAK �El 11 F o IT ELEY ELIII --STAIR LINK I 1 1 ICE DF w o StAI ELEC. _LJLJLJLJ STORAGE/ I I,� I I - - I L-------------- FIRST FLOOR HOTEL PLAN a ROOMS + AMENITIES) a100 1/16" = 1'-0" STOR. k6TAI Ll El 0^"0F],4�T MECH. Mit T"a 110MEr MEETING M � UtIL. \> FITNESS 1 0Cl.2 )o STOR POOL ----, OUIE ? EQUIPFTTI---SI-I-- 1 - I p POOL n 0 I� o Q O o F-] o FJ ®SCE 1C 1 C ELEV. t4_1RC I _ � 11 LL(U)IR MECH. ELEC. Van � tv I � DUES C C C C7 C STOP, C TJ CONSTRUCTIOW DEVELOP I DESIGN I MANAGE 1910 42nd Avenue W, Suite 300 Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 ciconstruction.com 320.763.2889 THIS SET OF PLANS IS THE PROPERTY OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. IT HAS BEEN ISSUED AS A CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE. COPY OR DUPLICATION OF ANY PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. T;�TT-Vql 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com NORTH REVISIONS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE Monticello Hotel prelim. floor plans Date June 3, 2024 Drawn by TVH / ER NORTH t�PICAL UPPER FLOOR MOTEL PLAN (2S ROOMS PER FLOOR) a100 1/16" = V-0" (P al 00 Scale as noted r I 11 ELEVATED VIEW FROM NORT�4EAST a2fd0 NOT TO SCALE C.I. CONSTRUCTION DEVELOP I DESIGN I MANAGE 1910 42nd Avenue W, Suite 300 Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 ciconstruction.com 320.763.2889 THIS SET OF PLANS IS THE PROPERTY OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. IT HAS BEEN ISSUED AS A CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE. COPY OR DUPLICATION OF ANY PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com REVISIONS NO. DESCRIPTION Monticello Hotel DATE exterior renderings Date June 3, 2024 Drawn by TVH / ER Scale as noted N O N L P �L 0 U w 2 VIEW FROM 50UTHUJEST a201 NOT TO SCALE Z VIEW FROM NORTHWEST a201 NOT TO SCALE 4 C.I. CONSTRUCTION DEVELOP I DESIGN I MFINnrTE 1910 42nd Avenue W, Suite 300 Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 ciconstruction.com 320.763.2889 THIS SET OF PLANS IS THE PROPERTY OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. IT HAS BEEN ISSUED AS A CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE. COPY OR DUPLICATION OF ANY PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com REVISIONS NO. DESCRIPTION Monticello Hotel DATE exterior renderings Date June 3, 2024 Drawn by TVH / ER a201N 0 N L P �L Scale as noted 0- 0 U F ELEVATED VIEW FROM NORt�4UJEST a2f�2 NOT TO SCALE C.I. CONSTRUCTION DEVELOP I DESIGN I MANAGE 1910 42nd Avenue W, Suite 300 Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 ciconstruction.com 320.763.2889 THIS SET OF PLANS IS THE PROPERTY OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. IT HAS BEEN ISSUED AS A CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE. COPY OR DUPLICATION OF ANY PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. NO Date 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com REVISIONS DESCRIPTION Monticello Hotel DATE exterior renderings Drawn by June 3, 2024 TVH / ER Scale a202 as noted N O N L P �L 0 U T.O. TOWER 56'10 os- sow �_..•; 04-FOURTH 771 = =.1 03-THIRD FLOOR 2 _ I I --- - 02-SECOND _I�..scg•;_;::_;.-I — — FLOOR #1 13' _ 0° — - I - - I I 01-GROUND LOOK — — — — 4 WEST ELEVATION a300 1/16" a 1'-0" T.O. TOWEE 56' - 10" 05-ROOF 46, 04-FOURTH FLOOR 35' - 0" 03-THIRD FLOOR 24 02-SECOND FLOOR 1T- 0" 01-GROUND FLOOR 0' 3 EAST ELEVATION a300 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 SOUTH ELEVATION a300 1/16" = 1'-0" NOfRTH ELEVATION a300 1/16" = 1'-0" 01-GROUND FLOOR —F — — — — — — — — — — T.O. TOWER 56'_1 - 46 - 6 M7 I 04-FOURTH — _ r — FLOOR — 35'-0" 03-THIRD FLOOR — — 24' _ 0" I: I li 02-SECOND — — FLOOR _ 13,_� ® ® 0 01-GROUND FLOOR 0'-01. C-0 I m- - H N ST RIJ UT I 01N DEVELOP I DESIGN I MANAGE 1910 42nd Avenue W, Suite 300 Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 ciconstruction.com 320.763.2889 THIS SET OF PLANS IS THE PROPERTY OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. IT HAS BEEN ISSUED AS A CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE. COPY OR DUPLICATION OF ANY PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com REVISIONS NO. DESCRIPTION Monticello Hotel DATE exterior elevations Date June 13, 2024 Drawn by TVH / ER a300 CD P �L Scale as noted 0- 0 U 34)„*, 34-7(81 $„ "'*2 34#7*" 414 99' 34#7*" #)"&!"'*8' 34#7*„ 1)!<&= +(„&$;!.20 34#7*" 81 &'$)."!!)5 09&'$)." 34*"8&$$4 09&'$)." 09&'$)."2# 34#7*" 81 &'$)."!!)5 0'&$) 34*"8&$$4 0'&$) 0'&$)20 34#7*" 0 34#7*" #)"&!"'*8' 0 34$&"*"' 0 02 34#7*" 0&$!>5"<&) 34#7*" 0&$!>5"<&) 0&$!>5"<&))!"'&.2 34#7*" 414 99' 0<4&'6<&))/**"5 34#7*" 1 0<4&'6< &))/**"5 34#7*" 0<4&'6<&) )/**"5 34#7*" 0 <4&' 6 <&) )/**"5 0<4&'6<&))/**"52# 34#7*" #)"&!"'*8' 0#11 &!."*8' 0#"& !"'*8'2 34#7*" #)"&!"'*8' 04 W !$!>*$*' 34#7*" 1)!<&= 04 34#7*" 1 04(&! 34$&"*"' 04(&! !$!>* 04(&! !$!>*$*'2, 34#7*" 1 0'&$) # 34#7*" #)"&!"'*8' 0' &$) 34#7*" 1)!<&= 0' &$) 34#7*" 1 0'&$) 0'&$)2## 34#7*" #)"&!"'*8' 0& 34#7*" 1)!<&= 0& 34#7*" 1 0& 0&2 34$&"*"' 04>'! . 04>'!.2 34*" 0**!!> 0**!!>2- 34#7*" 1 9&!"48&'/>'= 4 34*" 9&! "48&'/>'=4 9&! "48&'/>'=42# 34#7*" &'68**/&'6" 34#7*" #)"&!"'*8' &'68 **/&'6" &'68**/&'6"2# 34-7(81 $„ "'*2 34#7*" 414 99' !!)5)4%"'!*'44%"'!*') !!)5)4%"'!*'44%"'!*') !!)5=)"/2 34,7(81. $„ ,), * (&)*,=4* "'(&)* =i ) 34-7(81"*' (&)*'=4* "'(&)* 34,7(81. $" )„* (&)*'=4"* (&)*'=4"*2 0 +0- 0 0-+ 0 0+ 0 0 0, ,0 000 M 0+ 0 #0, A.71, "!*.•/#0,#-- 3 P-BUR P-BU \ sT ST MH (60") W/ SOLID CASTING RIM 956.50 INV E 953.00 (18" RCP) INV S 953.00 (18" RCP) INV NW 953.00 (18 RCP) MH (48") 964.20 SW 953.04 (6" PVC E 953.04 (8" PVC) 6� \ ST W FL- 953.1 � ST MH (48") W/ SOLID CASTING RIM 964.00 INV N 954.09 (18" RCP) ST i�: ST STi ST I I AIRS 4 CIVIL FLAN a010 I. = 30-0" I H 72" W/ INLET CASTING AND GRATE RIM 964.10 INV E 957.88 (21 " PVC) I' I INV W 956.25 (24" PVC) INV S 956.25 (24" PVC) I I I I ST MH (48") W/ SOLID CASTIN Drainage Basin F.F. 966.00 RIM 965.50 INV N 955.44 (18" RCP) ST MH (60") W/ I I � - - �T I I ST MH (48") W/ I � I INLET CASTING AND GRATE I cn RIM 964.80 I / I / INV W 959.47 (1 PVC) I INV N 956.01 (15" PVC) I � I FIRE IYDRANT ST I # W/ CASTING A ATr� RIM 964.40 INV E 960.00 (15" PVC) M= 9 4.60 V= 960.94 M='�� *5.26 r I IVI Y b 5. LU- INV 4-W-961.08 (15" RCP) INV $ 961.08 (15" RCP) I ST MH (48") W / I INLET CASTING f IRIM 966.30 IINV N 961.41 (1 I I I I I I PVC INLET RIM 964.30 INV N 960.30 (12" Hr INV S 960.30 (12" HDPE C.I. CONSTRUCTION, DEVELOP I DESIGN I MANnrTE 1910 42nd Avenue W, Suite 300 Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 ciconstruction.com 320.763.2889 THIS SET OF PLANS IS THE PROPERTY OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. IT HAS BEEN ISSUED AS A CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE. COPY OR DUPLICATION OF ANY PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF C.I. CONSTRUCTION, LLC. 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.taneA,.com REVISIONS NO. DESCRIPTION Monticello Hotel area civil plan DATE Date March 4, 2024 Drawn by TVH / ER aOl 0 N CD N L P �L Scale as noted 0- 0 U STANDARDS AND REFERENCES Materials and construction methods specified in the plans reference the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction. The Contractor shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and review the specification sections applicable to the plans. It is mandatory that the Contractor be knowledgable of the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with the applicable specification sections. Contractor shall refer to the geotechnical report for additional requirements and recommendations. EARTHWORK NOTES PROTECTION 1) The Contractor shall maintain all benchmarks, monuments and other reference points. If any are disturbed or destroyed, they shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. 2). The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any unknown functioning underground utilities are discovered during the course of the project, which may interfere with construction. The Contractor shall wait for instructions before proceeding. 3) The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to functioning underground or overhead utility lines. Damaged utilities shall be repaired immediately and service restored at no additional cost to the Owner. 4) The Contractor shall provide barricades, shoring and other safety measures required by OSHA. 5) The Contractor shall protect all adjacent existing facilities from damage, including, but not limited to settlement due to excavations, erosion, etc. The Contractor shall be responsible for the repair of such damages. PROJECT CONDITIONS 1) The Contractor shall become familiar with the project site, and compare actual conditions in the field with those shown on the project drawings. The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any inconsistencies are found between the existing conditions and the project drawings. 2) No extra compensation will be allowed due to unusual conditions which could have reasonably been determined or anticipated by examination of the project site and project drawings. PLAN GRADES 1) Elevations shown on the project drawings are finished grade elevations, unless noted otherwise. Elevations not specifically indicated shall be determined by interpolation of uniform slope between spot elevations and/or contours, or between such points and existing elevations. Adequate slope shall be constructed to provide positive drainage away from structures. 2) If inconsistencies exist on the plans between contours and spot elevations, the spot elevations shall govern. TOPSOIL 1) Adequate imported and/or stockpiled salvageable topsoil shall be utilized for this project. 2) Topsoil shall be free of clay lumps, roots, brush, large stones, and debris, and shall have a minimum organic content of 5 percent. 3) Remove topsoil to its entire depth from areas, which are to be disturbed by new construction work. Existing lawn areas, which are not in the proposed construction area(s) shall remain in place. The Contractor shall field verify topsoil depths between any soil borings, and remove to greater depths than indicated in the soils report if such conditions are encountered. Salvaged topsoil shall be maintained in stockpiles. 4) Stockpiled topsoil shall only be used for finish grading of new lawn areas. Excess topsoil shall be removed from the site by the Contractor. 5) Protect all existing lawn areas, plantings, and other landscaping to remain in place. Any damaged areas shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. UNFORESEEN OBSTACLES 1) The Engineer shall be contacted immediately if any unforeseen major obstacles are encountered during excavation, such as abandoned wells, abandoned or functioning utilities, subsurface streams or rock, etc., which would add significant expense to the Contractor. 2) The Contractor shall still be responsible for completing all work required for this project where encountered conditions may be reasonably determined from a soils/geotechnical report and review of the project site and contract documents. DEWATERING 1) Surface drainage shall be provided during construction in a manner so as not to create a nuisance to adjacent areas. 2) All excavations shall be free of water during construction within the excavations. Dewatering shall be accomplished by pumping or trenching, and shall be conducted regardless of the cause, source, or nature of the water. 3) Berms, cofferdams, or piling shall be provided as necessary to protect excavations. 4) Excavations shall be sloped to drain, and necessary pumps, hoses and other equipment shall be provided to keep excavation free of water. 5) All temporary equipment used for dewatering shall be removed from the site when no longer necessary. FILLING AND GRADING 1) Rough grading of all areas within the construction limits, including adjacent transition areas shall be reasonably smooth and compacted. The rough graded subgrade surface generally shall not be more than 6 inches above or below the established subgrade elevations. All ditches, swales, and gutters shall be graded to drain adequately. The subgrade shall be evenly sloped to provide drainage away from building walls in all directions at a minimum slope of 1 %. The Contractor shall provide rounded transitions at top and bottom of banks and other breaks in grade. 2) Fill and backfill materials shall be inorganic soils free of roots, rocks, boulders, and debris. 3) Bedding material or granular backfill larger than 2" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 2 feet of new underground pipes. Material larger than 3" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 1 foot of subgrade elevation. 4) Imported compacted fill material shall have a maximum of 12 percent passing the #200 sieve, by weight. The proposed fill material shall be tested by an independent testing lab for suitability as compacted fill for this project. The Contractor shall pay for the testing services and provide a copy of the test results to the Engineer. 5) The Contractor shall fill and grade as necessary to bring surface to required elevations, and provide all materials necessary, whether obtained on or off the project site. 6) The Contractor shall place compacted material in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8" in depth for clay soils, and 12" in depth for sandy soils, and compact as required to achieve specified density. 7) Compaction shall be obtained with the use of vibratory rollers or rammers. During compaction, fill material shall contain moisture content, as necessary, for the required compaction as indicated by an independent testing laboratory. The moisture shall be uniform throughout each lift. If the material is too dry, water shall be added with approved equipment and methods, which will not wash out fine material. If the material is too wet, it shall be dried by harrowing, disking, blading, or other approved methods recommended by the independent testing laboratory. 8) Areas designated for pavement in excavated (cut) areas shall be scarified to a depth of 1 foot. The Contractor shall bring the subgrade material to optimum moisture content as indicated by the independent testing laboratory, and compact the subgrade to the specified density listed below for soils underneath pavements. 9) The Contractor shall not place fill material when either the fill material, or the material on which it is to be placed, is frozen. Any soft or yielding areas appearing in the fill resulting from frost, rain, or any other reason whatsoever shall be scarified, removed, recompacted and/or otherwise rectified to the satisfaction of the Engineer before any new fill is placed. COMPACTION TESTS 1) Utility Trench Backfill: The Contractor's independent soils technician and approved testing laboratory shall perform in -place density and moisture tests at random depths in trench backfill at 100 foot intervals, or fraction thereof. Compaction of trenches shall be a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density (as determined by the independent testing laboratory) in lawn areas, and at depths greater than 3 feet below areas designated for pavement. Compaction of trenches at depths within 3 feet of paved surfaces shall be a minimum of 100% of the maximum dry density. 2) Compacted Fill Under Pavements: Compaction tests shall not be required beneath new pavements. Adequate compaction of materials under pavements shall be determined by test rolling the subgrade, and checking for excessive rutting. Test rolling shall be performed as per MNDOT Spec. 21 1 1. 3) Areas exhibiting a failed compaction test shall be re -compacted and re-m tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to acceptance of the project. 4) Copies of all compaction testing and test roll observation reports shall be provided to the Engineer. 5) Optimum moisture -density relationship will be determined by testing laboratory in accordance with ASTM D698 and maximum density determination made by Method D of ASTM D698 unless otherwise noted in these specifications. SUBGRADE PREPARATION 1) Finished subgrade elevations shall be as follows: a) Light duty bituminous pavement: 9" below finish grade. b) Heavy duty bituminous pavement: 9�' below finish grade. c) Concrete pavement/apron: 12" below finish grade. d) Concrete sidewalk: 8" below finish grade. e) Lawn areas: 4" below finish grade. f) Planting areas: See Landscaping Plans/Details 2) The tolerance for areas to be paved shall not exceed 0.15 feet above or below plan subgrade. 3) The Contractor shall protect newly graded areas from erosion. Settlement or washing that occurs prior to acceptance of the Work shall be repaired and grades re-established. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS WASTE MATERIALS 1) The Contractor shall remove excess excavated material, debris, and waste materials, from the Owner's property and legally dispose of it in accordance with all governing codes. SPREADING TOPSOIL AND FINISH GRADING 1) Scarify subgrade to depth of 3" prior to placing topsoil. Spread topsoil evenly over complete subgrade as follows: a) Lawn Areas on Private Property: Spread 4" lightly compacted layer of topsoil. b) Lawn Areas in Public Right-of-way: Per City requirements c) Planting Areas: See Landscape Plan/Details 2) Finish grade accurately within 0.15 feet of finish grades shown on the project drawings, less the thickness of any sod where it is to be installed. Slope all grades away from buildings to provide positive drainage. 3) Prepare topsoil suitable to receive seed and/or sod. Grading of areas designated for topsoil shall be reasonably smooth and even, and in accordance with MNDOT Spec. 2105.3G and 2574.3A4. All debris and stones exceeding 3" in diameter shall be removed from the soil surface of these areas prior to seeding. Areas compacted by vehicles or storage of materials shall be plowed, disked and harrowed to match texture of other finish graded areas. 4) Grass seed shall be in accordance with MnDOT Spec. 3876, seed mix No. 25-131, applied at the rate of 220 pounds per acre or as indicated on the landscape plans. Mulch shall be applied and discanchored to all seeded areas and shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3882, Type 3 or as otherwise indicated by the Engineer. UTILITY NOTES STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1) The following standard specifications shall apply to this project: a) Minnesota Plumbing Code - MN Rules Chapter 4714 (MN Dept. of Labor and Industry-MNDLI) b) Uniform Plumbing Code, latest edition (UPC) c) "What you need to know about utility service connections in the 2015 Minnesota Plumbing Code" http://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PDF/pe_usc.pdf d) City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Standard Specifications e) American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) f) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) g) American Water Works Association (AWWA) h) Minnesota Department of Transportation "Standard Specifications for Construction" (MN/DOT) 2) The Contractor shall comply with all local ordinances and codes 3) Certifications of all utility materials, as well as shop drawings, shall be submitted to the Engineer for review POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - SANITARY 1) Smooth walled polyvinyl chloride pipe and fittings shall consist of SDR 26 or SDR 35 pipe, unless noted otherwise, and meet the requirements of ASTM D3034 and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) All pipe and fittings shall be SDR 35 for depths of up to 20 feet, and SDR 26 for depths exceeding 20'. 3) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. DUCTILE IRON (DIP) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Ductile iron pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A1 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.5 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. Stainless steel fasteners shall be prohibited. 3) 6' pipe shall be Class 52. 8" and larger pipe shall be Class 50. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (C900 PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Polyvinyl chloride pressure pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.4 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. GATE VALVES - WATER 1) Gate valves shall meet the requirements of Sections 261 1.2C and 261 1.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HYDRANTS - WATER 1) Hydrants shall meet the requirements of Sections 261 1.2B and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Hydrants shall be Waterous WB67, or approved equal BLOCKING AND ANCHORING - WATER 1) Water main blocking and anchoring shall meet the requirements of Section 261 1.3A4 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Provide thrust reaction blocking consisting of concrete with a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 2000 psi. 3) Place between undisturbed ground and the fitting to be anchored. Place thrust blocking so that the pipe and fitting joints are accessible for repair. 4) Mega -Lugs may be used in lieu of thrust block if allowed by local utility. WATER SERVICE PIPE AND CURB STOPS 1) Copper tubing for water services shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) HDPE pressure pipe for water services shall meet the requirements of ASTM D2239, ASTM D2737, ASTM D3035, AWWA C901, CSA B137.1, and Section 261 1.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Curb stops for water services Section 261 1.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) HDPE pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM F2306, and Section 2621.2A8 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Minimum wall thickness shall be 0.035 inches for 12 and 15 inch diameter pipe, and shall be 0.05 inches for 18 and 24 inch diameter pipe. 4) Storm sewer crossing above and within 10-ft of existing or proposed water main or services shall meet the requirements of schedule 40 PVC. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) PVC storm sewer pipe and fittings within 10-ft of a building and/or water pipe crossing, or when specified on the plans, shall consist of Schedule 40 PVC, and meet the requirements of ASTM D1785, ASTM D2665, and ASTM F794, and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) If further than 10-ft from a building and/or water pipe crossing, PVC storm sewer pipe and fittings may consist of SDR 26 or SDR 35 pipe, unless noted otherwise, and meet the requirements of ASTM D3034 and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) All pipe and fittings shall be SDR 35 for depths of up to 20 feet, and SDR 26 for depths exceeding 20'. 4) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWER PIPE (RCP) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) RCP pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM C76, and Section 2621.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) The ASTM strength class of pipe shall be Class III unless otherwise shown on the Plans. 4) The pipe shall be drawn together by some approved method of jacking or winching. This pressure must be maintained until sufficient backfill is placed to keep the joint from opening. END SECTIONS - STORM 1) End sections shall be provided at all pipe inlets and outlets. 2) The end sections shall consist of material matching the material of the pipe, which it is being connected to. Materials and joints shall be as per the specifications described above for the applicable pipe material. 3) The last 3 joints of RCP shall be tied, and the end section shall the be provided with an approved trash guard. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS - SANITARY AND STORM 1) Unless otherwise noted, manhole and catch basin structures shall consist of precast concrete, and meet the requirements of Section 719.6 of the UPC (sanitary only), and Sections 2621.2C and 2621.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Catch basins shall be provided with the following castings: a) Along curbline: 27" Structure: Neenah R-3075-L, 48" (or larger) Structure: Neenah R-3067-L b) Isolated (in paved area): Neenah R-2553 c) Isolated (in vegetated area): Neenah R-2560-EA w/ type "C" grate 3) Manholes shall be provided with the following castings: a) Sanitary: Neenah R-1733 w/ concealed pick hole b) Storm: Neenah R-1733 lettered "STORM", center pick hole INSTALLATION 1) Unless otherwise noted, installation of all water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtenances shall be as per the CEAM Standard Specifications. TESTING REQUIREMENTS 1) Water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtances shall be inspected and tested as per Sections 261 1.3E-2611.3H and 2621,3F-2621.3H of the CEAM Standard Specifications. 2) In the event of discrepancies between the testing requirements of the MN Plumbing Code and the CEAM Standard Specifications, the most stringent will govern. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTES STANDARDS 1) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, most recent edition. GRANULAR BASE COURSE 1) Compacted thickness of finished base course: 6" 2) Process material for aggregate base shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3138, Class 5.. 3) The subgrade shall be tested and observed to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to placement of aggregate base material. Install base material as required to accommodate new plan grades. 4) Wet base material to approximate optimum moisture content either prior to delivery to job site or as soon as practical after being placed on subgrade. 5) Place in layers not exceeding 4" thickness (loose). 6) Compact with pneumatic or vibrating steel drum rollers. 7) After base course has been graded and compacted, thoroughly wet and slush roll with roller until all aggregates are thoroughly embedded. 8) Allow base course to cure for a minimum of 72 hours prior to bituminous course application. BITUMINOUS BASE AND SURFACE COURSE 1) Mix Designation Numbers for the bituminous mixtures on this project are per MNDOT Spec. 2360 2) Pavement smoothness requirements will be waived for this project. 3) Density for the bituminous mixture on this project will be the ordinary compaction method (MNDOT 2360.6C). 4) Light Duty: Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEA340B and shall be 4 inches thick after compaction. 4) Heavy Duty: Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 2 inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEA340B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. 5) Place no asphaltic mixture when the atmospheric temperature is below 45 degrees and falling, nor should pavement be placed under wet conditions. 6) Mixing a) Paving mixture: Uniform mixture of course aggregate, fine aggregate, mineral filler and asphaltic material. b) Grading and mixing: Conform to applicable sections of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, Section 2360. CONSTRUCTION METHODS 1) Properly clean base course and deliver hot mix asphaltic concrete in clean tight vehicles with covers if necessary. 2) Lay to a smooth surface without segregation of material and attain compaction as early as possible. Commence rolling while the material is hot, (minimum spread temperature 250 degrees F.) as soon as it will support the roller without undue displacement or hairline cracking and continue until a minimum of 96% of maximum has been attained, no further compression can be attained and all roller marks are eliminated. 3) The completed surface: Smooth, free of pockets that will retain water and shall not vary more than 1 /16" per foot nor more than 1 /4" under a 16' straight edge. Entire surface must drain. No flat areas are permitted. 4) Perform all Work in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. PAINTED LINES 1) Special marking paint compound especially for striping bituminous paving in one coat. 2) Manufacturers: Pratt & Lambert, Inc.; Sherwin Williams Co. or DuPont Co. 3) Colors: Use white paint for concrete and asphalt. 4) All surfaces to be painted must be thoroughly clean and dry. 5) Lay out painted lines with chalk on pavement in accordance with Project Drawings. 6) Accurately apply paint to the chalk marks, using striping machines, 4" wide stripes. 7) Apply paint in strict accordance with the manufacturer's directions. 8) Protect all paint from damage by traffic until dry. 9) Apply handicap logo at handicap stall. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL 1) Aggregate Base Testing: a) The granular base course shall be test rolled and observed by the Contractor's independent soils technician as per MNDOT 221 1.3C2 (Quality Compaction Method). Once the base course has been tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer, pavement may be placed. b) One mechanical analysis (ASTM D-422) per 500 cubic yards of base or fraction thereof. 2) Bituminous Testing: a) Test temperature of first truck. b) Ordinary compaction (MNDOT 2360.6C) CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS 1) ACI 318, ACI 315, CRSI, ACI 301, latest adoptions. 2) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction, most recent edition GRANULAR BASE COURSE MATERIAL 1) Compacted thickness of finished base: 6' - Concrete Pavement/Aprons 4" - Concrete Sidewalk 2) Base material shall consist of MNDOT 3149.2B2 Select Granular Borrow. AGGREGATES 1) Coarse: MnDOT Spec. 3137. 2) Fine: MnDOT Spec. 3126. WATER 1) Clean, fresh and potable, MnDOT Spec. 3906. AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES 1) ASTM C260. 2) Provide entrainment of 4 - 7 percent by volume. PORTLAND CEMENT 1) ASTM C150, Type I plus an approved air entraining agent, or Type IA air -entraining Portland cement. OTHER ADMIXTURES 1) MnDOT Spec. 3113. 2) Calcium Chloride or materials containing chlorides or nitrates shall not be allowed. PROPORTIONING AND DESIGN OF MIXES 1) Concrete Classifications a) Curb and gutter, slip -formed concrete: MNDOT Spec. 2461, Mix Design 31F32 b) Sidewalk, aprons, incidental concrete, manual curb & gutter: MNDOT Spec. 2461, Mix Design 31F52 c) Concrete pavements: MNDOT Spec. 2301, Mix Design 3A41 d) Repair concrete, fast strength concrete: MNDOT Spec. 2301, Mix Design 3A41 HE 2) Concrete Specifications: a) 3F32: J - 3" slump, 4500 psi, 5-8% air b) 3F52: 2 - 5" slump, 4500 psi, 5-8% air c) 3A41: 2 - 5" slump, 4500 psi, 5-8% air d) Temperatures of all concrete during placement shall be 50-deg F to 90-deg F CONCRETE PLACEMENT 1) Place concrete as soon as possible after mixing. Place before initial set has occurred, and in no event after it has contained its water content for more than one hour. 2) Avoid overworking concrete or allowing concrete to fall unrestricted for excessive vertical distances, and other situations which can cause segregation of the aggregates. 3) Concrete pavements shall be placed in accordance with applicable portions of MnDOT 2301. 4) Sidewalks shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2521. 5) Curb and gutter shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2531. PROTECTION 1) Provide adequate protection against rain, sleet and snow before and during placement and finishing of concrete. 2) Protect concrete from premature drying. Provide temporary covering as required. Keep concrete continuously moist for 7 days. 3) Treat concrete with membrane curing compound in accordance with MnDOT 2531.3G. COLD WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is below 40 degrees F., or when the concrete is likely to be subjected to freezing temperatures within 24 hours after it has been deposited unless adequate temporary heating is provided. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from freezing for the following 5 days. 3) No frozen materials may be used in the concrete. Chemicals may not be used to prevent freezing unless approved by the Engineer. 4) Perform all cold weather concreting in accord with ACI 306. HOT WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is above 100 degrees F. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from temperatures over 90 degrees for the following 5 days. 3) Thoroughly wet dry porous surfaces before concreting. 4) Water reducing admixtures with retarding properties are required for all concrete placed when the temperature exceeds 80 degrees F. 5) Perform all hot weather concreting in accord with ACI 305. FINISHING 1) Provide a broomed finish on exterior sidewalks and ramps unless noted otherwise. QUALITY CONTROL 1) The Contractor shall hire an independent testing firm to provide the following tests: a) The independent testing technician shall perform random field testing of the fresh concrete including slump, air content, and temperature. (ASTM C143, C173, C231 and C138). One series of the aforementioned tests shall be performed on the first load of concrete. b) The independent testing technician shall cast a set of four compression test cylinders for the first load of concrete as well as 1 set for every 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof, of concrete thereafter. Compression tests shall be performed on one test cylinder at 7 days and two test cylinders at 28 days. The fourth test cylinder shall be retained in the event of failing compression tests on the 28-day test cylinders. Note: The Contractor shall comply with the City of Monticello General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction. Coordinate with the City, as necessary. N O01 N co O CO O i W CA J Q 5 SCHULTZ ENGINEERING (D & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 U FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z O U IZ O IL O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 J 1 xx/xx/2024 W d ai U N Q N O N 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX C1 - STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN STANDARD NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS BARREL TO CONFORM TO ASTM C-478 LATEST REVISION STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" - MAX 12" 27• DIA WITH EXTERNAL OR 0 INTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL 8" I 48' DIA USE NEENAH R-1642—A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755—G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS APPLICABLE. tiP"FtiAH R-1642 WITH B SOLID LID NE BEARING OR CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) EAT OPPOSITE SI EXCEPT FOR LETTERI 25 3/4 7 BEARIN SURFACE TO BE MACHINED 1600/11:4 24" 28 1/2 36" FRAME TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE HE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED T A M IN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) ,.- A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. I 1'- 0" I OR 5' IN BACK OF CURB IF CONCRETE WALK OR BITUMINOUS PATH ARE HYDRAFINDER PRESENT WATEROUFLAG HYDRANT MODEL 67 HYDRANT YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG Z TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. AFTER BACK -FILL CL EXISTING OR FUTURE STREET BREAKOFF FLANGE CURB OR GUTTER LINE w 1" TO 2" MAXIMUM o ABOVE BURY LINE (FINISHED GRADE) FINISHED GRADE a VALVE BOX AS WATERMAIN SPECIFIED �1 " TO 2" � I z of 0 En 2 LAYERS OF o w 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 10' POLY (4 mil) c� X TYPICAL zW 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PIT" z UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH `� 1/4 STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR A MINIMUM OF 1 C.Y. OF 1 1-1/2" CLEAR STONE I = WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. o OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG MEGALUG GATE VALVE TEE THRUST MEGALUG BLOCKING BLOCKING BEHND BELOW GATE THRUST HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15"x 15"x 4") VALVE BEHIND TEE Title: Title: Title: Title: Typical Hydrant Cone Section, Casting Steps, Standard Frame Typical Trench Compaction Standard Plate Libraryyp y Standard Plate Library and Adjusting Rings Standard Plate Library and Cover Standard Plate Library and Class B Bedding Installation City of Monticello Date: City of Monticello Date. Plate No. City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. y 03-05 Plate No. 03-05 2001 Revised: 10 01 Revised: 1002 Revised: 1007 Revised: 03 —17 � 03-15 03-15 03-15 MEGALI TEE AND BEND BEND WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL. POLY PLUG PLUG NOTES: 1 THRUSTBLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1 /2' AND OVER.I PIPE SIZE BEARING AREA 1 6" 4.0 SO FT 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE I 8" 6.0 SO FT I WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 PSI. 1 10" - 12" 12.0 SO FT I 3. THRUST BLOCKS BEARING AREA TO BE POURED 1 16" 20.0 SO ET AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE USED FOR 12" OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 Fr. OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS Standard Plate Library Cit of Monticello Y GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE ANC MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMEN' ALL MANHOLES WITH INSIDE DROP SECTION SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CLASS II CIRCULAR REINF LATEST REVISION USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS STEPS AT 16" OC � 6" "CRE-SEAL","RESEAL", OR APPROVED EQUAL o 8" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE \ VARIABLE �1 MAX. 24" Q2 4 PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION •' WITH INVERT #5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY ^"""'^ SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) DR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" - MAX 12" 0 STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE 6" MIN NOTES: (1) MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. (2y IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24" INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. Title: Title: Blocking for Standard Sanitary Watermain City Standard Plate Library Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. of Monticello Date: Plate No. 2002 03-05 3001 Revised:03-17 Revised:03-15 STREET BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT - INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND LINE l I TRACER WIRE SPLICE l - lu CURB BOX STANDPIPE I i COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE I 2' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY l POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKETI POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT / CONTRACT I — 1" COPPER WATERMAIN COPPER STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT SANITARY SERVICE MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Tracer Wire (New Developments) Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised:03-15 3005 USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 BELOW FINISHED GRADE I VARIES 10' TO 20' --TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS r FINISHED GRADE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND — CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG r I� 4 PVC . HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 3006 It N O N C0 O (.0 O \ I W U) J Q SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 () FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Ir LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS F-- OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z 0 0 J. SCHULTZ, PE OBRIAN Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 OTC REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 J 1 xx/xx/2024 W Iz D_ 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 -STANDARD DETAILS C3 -STANDARD DETAILS C4 -STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN STANDARD DETAILS v 41 Q) N 2 O N NEENAH R-2553 (ISOLATED IN PAVED AREA) NEENAH R-3075-L (IN C&G) NEENAH R-2560-EA "BEEHIVE" (ISOLATED IN GREEN AREA) TYPE "C" GRATE 2" HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS 5 RINGS MAXIMUM (INSTALL ADJ. RINGS PER f MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS) . ...a � 2'-3" PRECAST CONCRETE BARREL / WATERSTOP GASKET, OR APPROVED X 5" �� ::'-� EQUIVALENT W/ NON -SHRINK PATCHING Q COMPOUND, AT PIPE/STRUCTURE 9 C? GROUT INVERT TO CONNECTION PROVIDE POSITIVE ° DRAINAGE TO PIPE CATCH BASIN SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 4006 \\.—SEE PLAN FOR PIPE DIAMETER 34 -�8" PRECAST CONCRETE BASE CATCH BASIN (MNDOT DESIGN "H") EXPANSION FADJACENT JOINT SURFACE CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A41 HE �� EXPANSION -- JOINT ADJACENT [d. SURFACE dam° 1 I- ������ IV I NOTES: 1. STEP RISER HEIGHT = 7" STEP TREAD WIDTH = 11 2. SEE PLAN FOR NUMBER OF STEPS 3. CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 2521.3C2 5 CONCRETE STEPS SECTION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER EXPANSION JOINTS NTS REINFORCEMENT: #4 BARS AT 8" O.C., EACH WAY 4" MNDOT 3149.2132 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE NTS EXPANSION JOINTS d F-AB B 6 Al d d ° 5' ° d d O CONCRETE TO BE EXPANSION POURED INTEGRALLY EXPANSION A WITH CURB JOINTS JOINTS PLAN B618 CONCRETE / CURB AND GUTTER VARIABLE 1 /4 PER /MIN FT. al MIN. 7 F?� �— 3/4 1" WIDTH VARIES 5' MIN. 8, SECTION B-B SECTION A -A Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Commercial Driveway Entrance Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 5008 CASTINGS MANHOLES: NEENAH R-1733-1 (LETTERED "STORM") W/ CONCEALED PICKHOLE CATCH BASINS: NEENAH R-3067-L (IN C&G) NEENAH R-2553 (ISOLATED) NEENAH R-2560-EA (ISOLATED BEEHIVE) - TYPE C GRATES CASTING (SEE ABOVE) RIM ELEV SEE PLAN 6j 2" HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS L� 5 RINGS MAXIMUM (INSTALL ADJ. RINGS PER .� MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS) C PRECAST CONCRETE COVER f c PRECAST CONCRETE BARREL(S) PLASTIC WITH RUBBER GASKET(S) ASTM C443-79 '. STEPS SEE PLAN FOR INTERIOR DIAMETER (ID) WATERSTOP GASKET, OR APPROVED ' EQUIVALENT W/ NON -SHRINK PATCHING COMPOUND, AT PIPE/STRUCTURE Z CONNECTION C e SEE PLAN FOR PIPE DIAMETER r .... s..}.. GROUT INVERT TO PRECAST CONCRETE BASE PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO OUTLET NOTES 1. SEE PLAN FOR INTERIOR DIAMETERS (ID) OF PRECAST CONCRETE BARREL SECTIONS 2. SEE PLAN FOR PIPE CUT-OUT SECTIONS 3. CONSTRUCT GROUTED FLOW LINES WITHIN STRUCTURE TO DIRECT FLOW TO OUTLET WITH NON -SHRINK GROUT 4. FILL ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN PIPE AND BARREL WITH NON -SHRINK GROUT. 3. PRECAST CONCRETE COVERS, BARREL SECTIONS, AND BASES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATES 4011 AND 4020 4. PLASTIC STEPS SHALL BE AS PER MNDOT STANDARD PLATE 4180 AND SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE OUTLET PIPE STORM MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN 2 NTS CONTRACTION JOINTS :�• .� a ,.o � ••.,•::, ,'.::� L 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 — 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH — 6' DEPTH — 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH — 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS — 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS — 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Typical Sidewalk (PUBLIC) Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —17 5 012 1�' BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPWEA340B) TACK COAT BETWEEN BITUMINOUS COURSES 12" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB330B) 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE 3 LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NTS NOTE: CROSS -DRAIN NEENAH R-4990-C CONCRETE TO BE PLACED TRENCH FRAME WITH OP WITH ONE CONCRETE POUR TYPE "C" LID 7101 1 /2" EXPANSION 4,: d d° a �VO`, P 1 1 /2" FROM FRONT JOINT (BOTH SIDES) ° �01 a G /� FACE OF THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK ° m 4 d FACE OF SIDEWALK Pod P . o d . 4 ° G ° °.bd PLAN VIEW 6 SIDEWALK CROSS —DRAIN NOTES 4' PER FT SLOPE 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO DRAIN FROM THE CURB CONCRETE 6„ 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3F32 3. MNDOT B612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE a - REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 1 10 M i :a .. A. J 2" MIN. COMPACTED MNDOT =1 I I=1 11=III=III=1 11=III=III CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE �—III—III-1 I I— III=11 �_� III III BELOW CURB AND GUTTER -III-III -I APPROVED COMPACTED - 20" _ SUBGRADE OCURB &GUTTER (MNDOT 6612) NTS REINFORCEMENT: #4 BARS AT 24" O.C., EACH WAY 6" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A41) .. • 1. 6" MNDOT 3149.2B2 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW -III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III I 1I- II I -III -III -III -I I I„ I I I; ,I I I -I I -II APPROVED COMPACTED =1 11=1 11=III, 1 11- ' III =1 11=1 11=1 I I- SUBGRADE I I I I I I I I I �� I I I- -I 11=1 11=1 I NOTE: PLACE CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT AT THE MIDDLE OF THE PAVEMENT THICKNESS 9 CONCRETE APRON SECTION / NTS 1�' BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPWEA340B) TACK COAT BETWEEN BITUMINOUS COURSES 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB330B) 6' MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4 HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NTS NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TYPICAL AND APPLY TO BOTH SIDES OF THE CROSS-SECTION 12" _ 4. d'd° d ° a +d d. ° d d. O`Q .1 ° A G°. d CONCRETE d f a ° SIDEWALK °�?i ': 10" �...I —•= I .d:.d .. ° 3F— � 1/2" EXPANSION 3" �F,. 4. d d °° m f ;:°°6' I . ° JOINT (BOTH SIDES) g d 1° ;��' d. A. [ 4 4] A' 10d ° ° A. .I ., d d. I°d REINFORCEMENT: P I l d ° °„' ° I U-SHAPED #4 BARS 1'� °° ° ° .� I AT 12" O.C. A° f 22" - PROFILE VIEW NTS I _ 2'-0" 1 -0 hj CONCRETE SEE PLANS FOR ♦.. 8, GUTTER SLOPE -I I— 71M 2" MIN COMPACTED I -II -I I CLASS 5 BELOW - VALLEY GUTTER APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE OVALLEY GUTTER CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB #4 BARS 4" (TYP) 4" (TYP) a 1} �d d a d n O d d JOINT CONCRETE APRON NOTES: 1. REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES WHERE CONCRETE APRONS ABUT CONCRETE FLOOR SLABS 2. BAR SPACING: 12" O.C. FOR 8" CONCRETE APRONS 18" O.C. FOR 6" CONCRETE APRONS 3. BARS SHALL BE PLACED AT THE CENTER OF THE THINNEST APRON OR SLAB, BUT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM BAR COVER OF 3" 4. BARS SHALL BE PLACED ACROSS TOTAL WIDTH OF BUILDING ENTRANCE NTS 10 APRON/FLOOR SLAB JOINT REINFORCEMENT NTS W W U) J 5 SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN 0 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 5;PH: (320) 339-0669 (� FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 T_ 0 OBRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 QREVISIONS Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 -STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 -STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN STANDARD DETAILS 0 4-1 3 N O N 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3F52) ....y + 4" MNDOT 3149.2132 SELECT ° GRANULAR BORROW APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 2521.3C2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK/PATIO SECTION (PRIVATE) 0 NTS TRUNCATED DOMES AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A 'j4 FLARED CONCRETE (TYP) 4 6" CURB FACE OQ� a b PAVEMENT J 6" CURB FACE 5 PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMPS W/ LANDING IN SIDEWALK NTS SLOPE TOWARDS ADJACENT STREET 2.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SP 9.5 SPWEB230B) 10-FT WIDE, AT 2.0% SLOPED TOWARDS PINECONE ROAD — 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE — APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS TRAIL SECTION 2 N NTS BACK OF CURB (TYP) FLARED CONCETE (TYP) P�� S �• °oo 00 FLUSH W/ PAVEMENT ° ° b 6" CURB TRUNCATED DOMES FACE (TYP) AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A PAVEMENT I` 12" GUTTER— (TYP) CURB FACE (TYP) (MAY BE OMITTED IF ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPING) o ° 00000 CURB FACE �o 000 (TYP) b CONCRETE RAMP W/--l' MAX. SLOPE OF 12:1 TRUNCATED DOMES ep AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A CONCRETE LANDING (FLUSH W/ ADJACENT PAVEMENT) PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMP ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK 3 K NTS TRUNCATED DOMES AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A 0 a a a a \' 0 4 a 6a b 6' CURB ° FACE a K a PAVEMENT FLUSH W/ PAVEMENT TRUNCATED DOMES AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A 6" CURB ° FACE Oe� a b PAVEMENT 6" CURB FACE OPEDESTRIAN ADA RAMPS W/ LANDING BACK OF CURB (TYP) CURB TAPE><< �\ (TYP) SO �N� a `0 ° 0 o� 4 2 b FLUSH W/ PAVEMENT 6' CURB TRUNCATED DOMES FACE (TYP) AS PER MINDOT STD. PLATE 7038A038A I, SIDEWALK PAVEMENT 12" GUTTER— (TYP) NTS PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMP W/ FLARED CURB 7 PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMP W/ LANDING R PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMP ALONG RADIUS CURB 6 NTS NTS NTS It N O N Cf) O O O w W U) J SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 () FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY rr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z O U IIr O ILL. O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 QREVISIONS Z` NO. DATE DESCRIPTION G J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 -STANDARD DETAILS C3 -STANDARD DETAILS C4 -STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN STANDARD DETAILS cn v� _ I vv I° ° , ° , ° ° ° ° ° • o ° ° ° ° ° °"° e -ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE -DEMOLITION O ° e ° ° e o° ° e o, ° ° ° ° ° o NEW RIM = 963.00 LIMITS (TYP) • e o e°.° :°°. .° ° e°°°, e° °°° ° • ° ° °>> /� RETAINING WALL#1 - > v HEIGHT = 0 TO 1.8-FTr > >>r RETAINING WALL #2 -2-FT CONCRETE VALLEY LENGTH= 86-FT < < < < < 3 HEIGHT = 0 TO 4.4-FT GUTTER @ 0.46% (TYP) < LENGTH = 301-FT < �< 58.89 59,1p EX 1 _ EX 59.31\ n > > = DEMOLITION EXr -- - - / rT > > > 2-FT CONCRETE VALLEY LIMITS (TYP) 60.20 h,�. DEMOLITION / /JFM �b 65.10 EX ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE7 - GUTTER @ 0.46% (TYP) - i 59.71- 1 6 NEW RIM = 962.41 -- FM t B3 .48 � 1 F \ EX I 9' ( ) EX EX - i b� 1 E / RIkA Q ID 2 52- EX _ FM J� ! I RIM = o47.i� FM FM INV�i5439 12" HDPE EX + / INV = 959Ex 60.43.9 63.70 62 42 - - - _ - - M 59.81 _ •9 -__ � ��- - T� 964 o/ 1 ,I 63- EX 960^ --- - ---- X I" ra a e 1J ih I� en I �9 - - - 60. 63 00 962 ---- - Dc ] a' RIM =962.o I I -----� o -- - ----- o, .Q W 1.3�°Lt f� o N o o ✓ rn 9 62.75 INV = 959. ib I ' I 1.4% ` 6' I 63 5 63.40 63• �' o ( H P 1 l % 1 co \ o I I I I f f I Ir ( CO g2 1.3% HP 62.95 1.0% -`,o 20 63.70 - °� o� 64.10 g0 149 LF CB8 (48" ID) 6+� 63,50 a, II I 6�° 62.80 62•g0 03 �j� J - - - - - 964 12" HDPE RIM = 90.90 2� 62.7 T I I I I � I 62 7 } 6^�° `, 30 L ���j�r� 80 , 02 3 I �, 16�' 6� �y ' 9 64 40 64 10 @ 0.89% INV = 958.64 63.40 0 6 9 3.70 O 9 n� ----- ------ 63.85 �* � 963.31 I I �0 _ _ 63.40 N 88 ° 4T 24" E 1 9 63, 7p N ° I 64.1 U 64.50 6A� /q�l°H P 63.60 6, 959.38 1 11 962 �`L� ,r 2I� - - 10 - "' 0 96 0 0 ' I I 1 64.40 I 64.30 I 64.60 63.9p ST 1 ✓ 63 c° o I 64.60 64.30 r' o .l I I I ���� 0 � - � I I I 63.50 1 cr CB4(27"ID)� 6 1 n I 096 - 2 p5 6 j6Q_ 6,l.00 I �� I 64.70 64.70 1� 4 �b° 1( RIM = 962.00 1 ^ 0 2.$p I I 63.00 9670 - k- - . 64 �"*. ! /�" I � �1 INV = 959.25 1 - 63• I I I J I 1 63 30 12 LF M I ± CB2 (48" ID) I - 0 063.85 R 64, 64.10 17 q6 28 LF @ HDPE 4 60 64 / 8" PVC @ 0.89% 1 RIM = 962.15 0 64.20 1 I 64.74 - - 64.81 /7 @ 1.00% \ o 1 76 LF-' I 6�}•1�J 6 64.81 W INV = 959.54 �r> N �_ 8\ 1 �� ►�` ° _ I I _�- 4 81 o �, O -� 6� 64 8 _ - - - - 964 - I SIDEWALK CROSS -DRAIN - I I ; 12" HDPE I ^ \ 212 LF I It -- - - I - - I - 6 64.$ F = 963.25 qb� I RIM (963 00 ° T 0 rn 964 @ 0.66% 1 � 1 1% 15" HDPE r co � ,� ap � � � 4•$1 1 FLOWLINE W = 963.35 rn 81 64.81 �/ 4) I 35 82 LF 5 1.0% I HP1 �� @ 0.30% 64' 64.81 64.81 81 64 g1 0� co 64.35 64.3 64.35 64.35 I cn INV = 958.06 1 cP 'rn 64.15 .� 64 co q'` g4,35 I 64 6" SCH 40 PVC ( 64.35 rr g3 J9 v �+ 0 1 �5.35 TMH1 (48" ID) 64.35 6N0 �o� g4,81 i 6 1 I I �3 @ 1.07% o ° l RIM = 963.35 ° 4.8 � S CONNECT TO INTERNAL 64.81 rc I I INV = 9 .75 1�� \ 1 1 �CB7A (27" ID) ROOF DRAINS ° 4 LF SIDEWALK CROSS -DRAIN- / PROPOSED BUILDING CONNECT TO INTERNAL- I RIM = 963.85 PROPOSED BUILDING C65 (48" ID) INV @BLDG = 958.34 64.81 18" HDPE FLOWLINE N = 963.85 FFE = 964.85 SIDEWAL SS DRAIN ROOF DRAINS I I INV = 960.85 FFE = 964.85 63.80 RIM = 962.80 HP 64.50 I - O @ 0.30% FLOWLINE S = 963.75 F�QWLTNE N = 963.85 INV @ BLDG = 960.31 1 ------- FLOWLINE I o O 1 ^ 1 INV = 958-i 63 45 S = 963.75 --5 LF 1 �I/ ) 63.80 I 0 64.$ DP _ 64.35 of 35 - / I 64.35 `n `n "` �g 6� 5 0� 35 64.81 1 64. 1-F� I .oI o I 65 I _ /� 6 64.35 64.3 ° I w 9 I o� a °9 63 • I 64.81 `° co 64.3 64 35 �( 64.35 64.81 64.35 I 1 70LF 6 15 1_ �� W p9 I 1 -4 a �I I I ` l 18" HDPE - 38 LF 64. 1 j° FLOWLINE E = 963.10 - 1 7 LF I I rn L� WALK CR S DRAIN v �° 1 I @ 0.30% 8p ,�� \ --- - - - 8" PVC 64.81 \ ; I �, cr O �� I v I 04.601- * - @ 1 00% FLOWLIN"FM = 963.20 2" HDPE I o I u 63.55 �c,, � l� 1 63.55 1 63.35� 64.81 64.81 @ 0.89% ,� 7 o I V 0 fill -q I 9bb' 6,380 ° ,o ov cMo cfl IN ' 64 1 6p�. Op?CB11 27" ID I I 64.2 63.75 I 63.75 _ co ° 82 LF CB13 (48" ID)- 6 �O M � � 0 90 LF ( ) HP HP 12" HDPE RIM = 963.35 O CO v 6, 1 6, Op a 64.pp 3p �o s 12" HDPE \ RIM = 963.00 HP 63.50 63. 5 `@ 1.00% 64.81 05 qo I - 64. 64,30 � INV = 960.85 cfi k -74 LF @ 0.45% INV = 958.88 3 3• ADJUST EXIS G ANHOL� I 6 by -�a 63,7 3. 5 RIM= 64.0'1 79 LF 969 N 12" HDPE IM= 965. �� ° o I 8 HP '� _ �A - 6 NEW RIM 963.2 RIM= 964.24 - c 9 I KIVM 3.99 18' SCH 40 PVC STMH2 (48" ID) @ 0.45% 6�� 63'40 j/ / / / I I 964 �' I M/ E� W= • 1 rn �� k- _ I - 3, 0 '�L @ 0.30% 63.80 RIM = 963.80 1 ° INV E / W- 045 0% � � o � � 0% �,, RI � 6 64.70 1• ° HP 11% I 32 I ply 6 d o - INV= 958.14 1 = L.bl 6 I HP INV=958.18 % ,� � _ _ / L 12 / rn 1.5% o l . l �° w \ �4 O N _ 63 5 V rn " 1 4 py I qbV -\ --- - - - -- -i-, N tM0 c0 o UI M ---- --- -- - - -- - � ° ° ° l.l� 1.2% HP 6.5� 67.3 ---�- C�6(f8„I ) �i o -- -- 6365_ -. --� N 6 63.85 R HP 12"HDPE 6 I I - - - - - -- - -- -- - I'f b 63.50 63.80 4.90 � �RJt1 = N6 1 J 64.0 _ 64.55 j� ° _ 63 g0 964 @ 0. _% / - - ---- -----_ -- so > -�� i �_ -r - - - / -- --- - - - - 964 - .. ` 964 M �.., - - 4.35 � \64.30 ___ ° -- - --- -- 7.05 964 I � � -- - - STMH4 j48" ID - - - - - - - - 64. 6 -qb� B RIM = 963.15 STMH3 (48" ID) 65.2 r - - I - ----- `--------- ---- - ui IOLFJ /) 17LF-/INV N, E, S = 959.95, = 63.�0 5.15 f4.35 RIM 9 6 I , I -------B 1 4.26 ^ - - - - - - gr-M an ressFasement I n 6" PVC - 12" HDPE INV Vd = )58.75 INV= 955.93 I ,per Doc. No 1433685 64.65 �_ - \-CB14 (48" ID) @ 0.90% @ 1.17% SUMP = 954.75 4 I gC I NOTE: FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONNECT TO EXISTING BC - HP CB10 (48" ID) I ^ I RIM = 963.00 ^ 64.75 I n I ELEVATIONS OF DEEPHAVEN STORM SEWER STUB CB 12 (27" ID)- FL _� RIM = 963.00 APARTMENTS. PROPOSED SPOT g INV = 958.51 RIM = 962.90 65.18 INV = 957.02 ----_l� v INV 0 - 64.90 � _� - I - - - - - - - - FIELD VERIFY FL CONNECT E EXISTING - - - - - - - 4.25 FL 64.36 ELEVATIONS ARE BASE ON ( ) h INV = 960.15 > BC EC STORM SEWER STUB NOTE: FIELD VERIFY EXISTING I PREVIOUS PLANS DATED 07-07-20. �j cp UNDERGROUND STORMTECH T > > 64.55 , rn < T NOTE: EXISTING o STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM RIM= 964. 0 � p INV = 955.93 ELEVATIONS OF DEEPHAVEN I I DEMOLITION TRANSFORMER TO CO vi (FIELD VERIFY) APARTMENTS. PROPOSED SP(PT RIM= 3.97 I (2) ROWS OF 14 MC 4500 - INV= 955. 7 0 I I ^ 1 LIMITS (TYP) RIM= 964.06 BE RELOCATED. � � CHAMBERS W/ ISOLATOR ROW RIM= 964.43 ELEVATIONS ARE BASE ON I INV= 9 .26 I INV= 959.98 NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVIOUS PLANS DATED 07-07-20. INV= 958.00 (SEE 1/C5) DEMOLITION V OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION RIM= 964.88 LIMITS (TYP) FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY INV= 961.73 OWNER FOR WORK COMPLETED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. NOTE: REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS - - PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK AND CURB & GUTTER AS NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL NECESSARY FOR NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK AND CURB & GUTTER AS NECESSARY PER CITY REQUIREMENTS (SEE C10). STORMTECH SYSTEM NOTES: 1. TRAFFIC FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE ACROSS AREA DESIGNATED FOR STORMTECH SYSTEM, AND BE ONLY LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT. DESIGNATED AREA SHALL BE EXCAVATED WITH A BACKHOE STATIONED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 2. THE BOTTOM OF THE STORMTECH EXCAVATION SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 24 INCHES WITH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT (TILLER, RIPPER, ETC.) PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE CRUSHED ROCK BASE 3. ONCE THE EXCAVATION AND SCARIFICATION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE AND PAY FOR TESTING THE INFILTRATION RATE OF THE BOTTOM OF THE EXCAVATION PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE CRUSHED ROCK BASE. THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER. 4. STORMTECH SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. BOTTOM OF BACKFILL/ TOP OF CRUSHED ROCK -- ELEVATION = 961.67 TOP OF CHAMBER ELEVATION = 960.67 \ TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION = 963.00 NOTE: PAVEMENT AND CLASS 5 ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS BOTTOM OF CLASS 5/ DETAIL ARE THE ELEVATIONS AT TOP OF BACKFILL THE LOWEST PAVEMENT ELEVATION = 962.25 ELEVATION ABOVE THE SYSTEM. SURFACE ELEVATIONS WILL VARY ABOVE THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION O REGARDING THE STORMTECH SYSTEM, CONTACT THE {� /- I � ! FOLLOWING. ADS CONTACTS: INLET - ELEVATION = 957.59 TOM ROONEY (VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER) (612) 756-3552 OUTLET - ELEVATION = 958.65 MIKE ARENDS (VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER) (612) 597-1909 OTTOM OF STONE BOTTOM OF CHAMBER - ELEVATION = 954.92 ELEVATION = 955.67 NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE RELEVANT ELEVATIONS OF THE STORMTECH MC-3500 UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM FOR THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM PER SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OF THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 0 UNDERGROUND STORM STORAGE SYSTEM ELEV GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: * LOCATIONS, DEPTHS, SIZES, AND MATERIAL TYPES OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM SEWER UTILITIES, INCLUDING EXISTING STUBS * RIM AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING SANITARY AND STORM SEWER UTILITIES, INCLUDING EXISTING STUBS * LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING NON -SEWER AND NON -WATER UTILITIES (IE: GAS, ELECTRIC, COMMUNICATIONS, ETC.) * EXISTING ABOVE -GROUND INFRASTRUCTURE AND SITE FEATURES 2. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. 3. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY COMPLETED BY KLD SURVEYING, BRAINERD, MN. (218) 829-5333 4. BENCHMARK: CONTACT SURVEYOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1 166 FOR A UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 6. SEE SHEETS C2, C3, & C4 FOR STANDARD DETAILS. 7. STORM SEWER STRUCTURE DESIGNATIONS: * "CB" DENOTES PRECAST CONCRETE CATCH BASIN * "NP" DENOTES NYLOPLAST CATCH BASIN NTS "STMH" DENOTES PRECAST CONCRETE STORM SEWER MANHOLE * "STCO" DENOTES STORM SEWER CLEANOUT * "("XX" ID)" DENOTES INTERIOR DIAMETER OF STRUCTURE 8. FINISHED ELEVATIONS OF LANDSCAPED AREAS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OR TOP -OF -BLOCK ELEVATION, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLAN. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL NECESSARY CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR'S BID RELATED TO EARTHWORK, CUTTING, FILLING, GRADING, ETC. SHALL BE BASED ON EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10. SPOT ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPOT ELEVATIONS LOCATED ALONG CURB & GUTTER OR THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK REPRESENT FLOWLINE ELEVATIONS OF GUTTER SECTION OR ADJACENT PAVEMENT. TOP -OF -CURB OR TOP -OF -THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK SURFACE ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. * " EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION * "HP" DENOTES HIGH POINT * "FL" DENOTES FLOWLINE * " BC" DENOTES BACK OF CURB * "EC" DENOTES EDGE OF CONCRETE * "EP" DENOTES EDGE OF PAVEMENT 12. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS CATCH BASINS, CURB CUTS, PONDS, BASINS AND/OR OTHER OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT SPECIFIED SURFACE INFRASTRUCTURE TO ELEVATIONS AND GRADES INDICATED ON THIS PLAN, AS WELL AS ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IS CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SITE AND/OR CONSTRUCTION AREA. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTRACT WITH A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR DESIGN OF ANY RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 14. LINEAL FOOTAGE AND HEIGHTS OF ANY RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ESTIMATED, BASED ON THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BACKGROUND, AND SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN THE FIELD. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RAILING ALONG RETAINING WALL AS REQUIRED BY CODE. IF REQUIRED BY THE MN DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (MNDLI), OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR STATE PLUMBING REVIEW, AND OBTAIN AN APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT FROM MNDLI, PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY STORM SEWER UTILITIES. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER UTILITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AFTER THE APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND ANY AND ALL PERTINENT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS AND IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO ORDER STORM SEWER UTILITY MATERIALS AFTER APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM MNDLI NOTE: CADD FILES FOR ESTIMATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTORS FOR PREPARING BIDS. IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE CADD FILES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SIGN A HOLD -HARMLESS AGREEMENT PROVIDED BY SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, AND AGREE TO PAY A $50 PROCESSING FEE. THE CADD FILES WILL BE RELEASED UPON RECEIPT OF THE CHECK NOTE: REMOV EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVF,I 4ENT AS ECE$SARY FOR NEW DRIVEWAY ENT ANCE ° ° REPLACE BITUMI OUS PAVEMENT AS /NECESSARY PER ITY REQUIREMENTS (SEE C10). ° NOTE: CONTRA OR WkLL OBTAIN ALL NEC SSARY PERMITS FOR WO K WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF�WAY. EX 1 0 ° DEM LITION ° ° F LIMIT TYP) cI IF LJ w W C0 J G °z° SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 5; PH: (320) 339-0669 U FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA O IY 0 OBRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 1 DATE: xx/xx/2024 QREVISIONS Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 J 1 xx/xx/2024 W CE IZ 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS © SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX C1 -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN GRADING PLAN SCALE: 1 "=30' 1 1 1 0 30 60 C5 DOWNSTREAM PONDS SI M/s`S'/SS�AA woo /,'iVF PROPOSED SITE h E1In C', t,. VICINITY MAP PROJECT INFORMATION NTS Protect Description This project will consist of the construction of a new hotel & restaurant building with an approximate footprint of 27,000-SF. Some storm water management will be required for this project, which will consist of an underground storm water detention system. Disturbed Area & Impervious Surface Tabulation Proposed Construction Area (includes adjacent property) Only Subject Property Anticipated Disturbed Area 4.0 acres Anticipated Disturbed Area 3.6 acres Existing Impervious Area 0.00 acres Existing Impervious Area 0.0 acres Proposed Impervious Area 3.13 acres Proposed Impervious Area 3.00 acres Net Impervious Area Increase 3.13 acres Net Impervious Area Increase 3.00 acres Permanent Site Drainage Site drainage from the majority of the proposed development will be routed directly to an existing regional storm water facility located on the property to the south. Storm water will be conveyed via proposed and existing storm sewer. Based on information provided by the City of Monticello, the downstream storm water facility is designed and sized to provide water quality and rate control for impervious area from the proposed project equal to 75% of the total site area. The proposed project includes proposed impervious surfacing equal to 83% of the total site area. This equates to proposed impervious surfacing, in excess of the originally assumed 75%, of 8% of the total site area or 12,600-SF. It is proposed for site drainage from an area with greater than 12,600-SF of impervious area be directed to a proposed StormTech underground storm water detention system to provide water quality and rate control for the excess impervious area. The StormTech system has been designed to treat drainage from 1.1" of runoff off the excess impervious area as per City MS4 and MPCA NPDES permit requirements. For larger events, the StormTech system and associated outlet has been designed to limit discharges such that post developed site runoff rates do not exceed predeveloped site runoff rates from 2, 10, and 100-year, 24-hour storm events, from the contributing drainage area. Pre-treatment has been provided for the proposed StormTech system via a catch basin sumps. STORMTECH SYSTEM CALCULATIONS Draw Down Time Total contributing impervious surfacing = 18,600 sf Assumed underlying soils: Poorly graded sand with silt (SP-SM) (based on geotechnical report) Required water quality volume = 18,600 sf x 1.1-in = 1,710 cf Assumed groundwater elevation: Below 930 (based on geotechnical report) StormTech System Assumed infiltration rate: 1.60 in/hr Provided infiltration volume: (based on MN storm water manual) 3,430 cf (See Storm Water Calculation Report) Maximum time of infiltration = 48 hrs, 0 min Design time of infiltration = 48 in (4.0-ft) / 1.60 in/hr = 30 hrs, 00 min (assuming full system to outlet) Receiving Surface Waters The following surface waters could receive storm water runoff from this project, and are within 1 mile of the project site: Surface Water Type of Impaired Special USEPA Approved TMDL Comments Surface Water 2 Water. 2 2 Water. for Impaired Water. p IDownstream Ponds Pond No No Distance = 0.1 to 0.3 miles IMississippi River River No Yes Distance = 0.9 miles SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS This SWPPP has been designed mainly to provide erosion and sediment control of naturally occurring soils at this site (ie: sands, loams, and clays). Although this SWPPP does address pollution prevention of other man-made materials, it is assumed that these materials will consist of debris from existing structures and pavements to be demolished, or debris and chemicals fie: fuels, new paints, etc.) resulting from new construction. There are no known solid wastes or hazardous materials buried below grade at this site. If such wastes or hazard materials are discovered during construction, the SWPPP Coordinator (described below) will be responsible for notifying the Engineer. This SWPPP will then be revised to address he presence and disposal of these additional pollutants EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES SWPPP Design Engineer and Qualifications Design Engineer Brian J. Schultz, PE Training Course Design of SWPPP Recert. * "Design of SWPPP" is a recertification course offered by the University of Minnesota. The Engineer's certification Training Entity University of Minnesota for "Design of SWPPP" is current, and will expire May 31, Instructor John Chapman 2026. Certification documentation is on file at the Engineer's office and a copy can be provided upon Dates of Training Course Spring 2023 (Online Course) request. Total Training Hours 7.0 SWPPP Coordinator and Qualifications The Contractor shall provide an individual who shall serve as the SWPPP Coordinator for this project. The SWPPP coordinator shall oversee the implementation of this SWPPP, as well as the necessary inspections (described below) of erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs. The SWPPP Coordinator shall also oversee the installation, maintenance, and repair of the BMP's to be completed in accordance with this SWPPP. The SWPPP Coordinator shall be responsible for the items listed above during the period from the start of the project to the establishment of final stabilization. During this period, the SWPPP Coordinator, or their assigned, qualified (see below) representative shall be available for an on -site inspection within 72 hours upon request by the MPCA. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to complete the table below, which will identify the SWPPP Coordinator and that person's qualifications. This person shall acknowledge that he/she has been assigned to serve as SWPPP Coordinator and will be overseeing the items listed in this section, by providing their signature in the space below. Please note that this SWPPP will not be considered complete if the table below is not filled in. * Typically, the identity of the SWPPP Coordinator is unknown until the project is awarded. The SWPPP Coordinator may be identified at the project's Preconstruction Conference. SWPPP Coordinator Company Name Office Phone # Cell Phone # Training Course Training Entity Instructor Dates of Training Course Total Training Hours I, , hereby (Printed Name) acknowledge that I will be serving as SWPPP Coordinator for this project and will be responsible for overseeing the items identified in this section. (Date) (Signature) The SWPPP Coordinator may assign other personnel to supervise or perform the duties listed above. However, in completing the duties listed above, at least one person shall be trained in erosion prevention and sediment control as related to that particular part of the SWPPP. If the SWPPP Coordinator chooses to delegate some of the duties and responsibilities listed above to other personnel, a list of the personnel, as well as their qualifications, shall be kept with and shall become part of this SWPPP. The qualifications shall be documented in a manner similar to the table shown above. A copy of this list shall be provided to the Engineer. Once the project has been completed and accepted by the Owner, and Final Stabilization has been established and "Notice of Termination" submittedto the MPCA, the Owner assumes responsibility for the long term maintenance of the storm water management system. The SWPPP Coordinator shall be responsible for ensuring that the Contractor properly disposes of the temporary erosion and sediments control measures within 30 days after site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary measures are no longer needed. Record Retention The SWPPP and associated records shall be stored and maintained by an employee or representative of the Owner for 3 years after the submission of the Notice of Termination (NOT) Responsibility for overseeing the records will be transferred to another employee or representative should the current personnel become uninvolved with the project or Owner. These records shall include the following: 1). The final SWPPP 2). Any other stormwater related permits required for the project 3). Records of all inspection and maintenance conducted during construction 4). All permanent operation and maintenance agreements that have been implemented, including all right-of-way, contracts, covenants and other binding requirements regarding perpetual maintenance 5). All required calculations for design of the temporary and permanent Stormwater Management Systems BMP INSPECTIONS Inspection Frequency The SWPPP Coordinator shall inspect, or designate someone else who is qualified to inspect (see above), the construction site erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs per the following time frames: 1). Once every 7 days 2). Within 24 hours of a rain event (1 /2" or greater over 24 hours) Inspections shall be conducted per the time frames listed above with the following exceptions: 1). Where parts of the construction site have permanent cover, but work remains on other parts of the site, inspections of areas with permanent cover may be reduced to once per month 2). Where construction sites have permanent cover on all exposed soil areas and no construction activity is occurring anywhere on the site, the site must be inspected for a period of 12 months (inspections may be suspended during frozen ground conditions). Following the 12th month of permanent cover with no construction activity, inspections may be terminated until construction activity is once again initiated or sooner if notified in writing by the MPCA. 3). Where work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, the required inspections and maintenance schedule must begin within 24 hours after runoff occurs at the site or prior to resuming construction, whichever occurs first. Inspection Records The SWPPP Coordinator shall maintain inspection records during construction. These must be recorded in writing within 24 hours of the inspection and/or maintenance activity. The inspection records shall include the following: 1). Date and time of inspections 2). Name of person(s) conducting inspection 3). Findings of inspections, including recommendations for corrective actions 4). Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities) 5). Date and amount of any rainfall events greater than 1 /2" in 24 hours a). The Contractor shall install and maintain a rain gauge at the construction site in order to verify rainfall amounts. 6). If any discharge is observed to be occurring during the inspection, a record of all points of the property from which there is a discharge must be made, and the discharge shall be described (i.e., color, odor, floating, settled, or suspended solids, foam, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of pollutants) and photographed. 7). Documentation of any changes to the SWPPP made during construction a). If the SWPPP coordinator observes that a BMP fails on a regular basis and believes that it is ineffective, it shall be his/her responsibility to notify the Engineer of such deficiencies. The Engineer may then amend the SWPPP (see "Amending the SWPPP") Note: Copies of all inspection records shall be submitted to the Engineer. AMENDING THE SWPPP During the construction of this project it may become necessary to amend this SWPPP. Should the responsibility of installing, inspecting and maintaining the erosion and sediment control devices and techniques described in this SWPPP be transferred from the current Contractor to another Contractor, or from the current Contractor to the Owner, this SWPPP shall be updated accordingly. The Owner will also be required to complete an "Permit Modification Form". Should it be determined, during construction, by the SWPPP Coordinator, Engineer, or Regulatory Officials that deficiencies in this SWPPP exist, or if significant changes are made to the design/scope of this project that impact erosion prevention and sediment control, the Engineer shall be notified immediately. The Engineer will then review potential deficiencies and/or significant changes to project design/scope, and make necessary changes to the SWPPP. After changes are made to the SWPPP the Engineer will issue the necessary documentation reflecting the changes, to the g - g rY - g g - owner and to the SWPPP Coordinator. The SWPPP Coordinator shall be responsible to make sure that this documentation is added to the on -site SWPPP copy and that the changes described in the documentation is implemented on -site. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS Standards and References Materials and construction methods of all BMPs included in this SWPPP shall be as per the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction, latest edition. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and familiarize themselves with the specification sections applicable to this SWPPP, as there are several BMPs that specifically reference these sections. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall be expected to be familiar with the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with these specification sections. Undisturbed Areas If shown on the plan, the Contractor shall delineate areas that are not to be disturbed on the site. This may be done with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc., and shall be completed prior to the start of any grading operations. Regardless of the delineation method the Contractor chooses to use, the Contractor must communicate to his/her personnel and subcontractors that these areas are not to be disturbed and construction equipment (including trucks and personal vehicles) shall not be allowed in these areas. The Contractor shall minimize compaction and preserve topsoil as much as possible at the site. In pervious ("green") areas that are not essential to the construction of the project, the Contractor shall avoid construction traffic and maintain the existing condition of these areas. Temporary and Permanent Stabilization All exposed soil areas (including stockpiles) shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 7 days of construction activity temporarily or permanently ceasing in that portion of the site. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales, which drain off -site or to a surface water, and are within 200 lineal feet of the property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 24 hours of construction. Placement of temporary or permanent cover shall be initiated immediately upon suspension or completion of excavation operations. Temporary Cover: If the Contractor chooses to halt grading operations in a portion of the site (or the whole site) for a period exceeding 7 days, and grading operations (rough or finish grading) in the affected areas has not yet been completed, temporary cover shall be placed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary cover within 24 hours of connection. Depending on the Contractor's schedule, the temporary cover shall consist of one of the following BMPs: 1). Discanchored Mulch a). Discanchored mulch may be used in an area of the site for the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively short, but exceeds 7 days. b). The mulch shall be Type 3 per MNDOT Spec. 3882 c). An adequate quantity of mulch shall be evenly distributed to achieve 90% coverage of the exposed soils. d). Mulch shall be placed as per MNDOT 2575.3C. e). All mulch shall be disc anchored as per MNDOT 2575.3D. Prior to the placement and discanchoring of the mulch, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2574. f). Any areas that are exposed as a result of wind action after the initial mulch placement shall be covered with additional mulch to maintain 90% coverage. 2). Temporary Seeding with Mulch a). Temporary seeding with mulch may be used in areas of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively long. Although mulch still needs to be applied as described above, once the temporary seeding/turf is established, the mulch will no longer need to be maintained. The temporary seeding/turf will require very little maintenance. b). Prior to the sowing of temporary seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2574. c). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mixes 21-1 1 1, 21-1 12, or 21-1 13 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for temporary seeding. d). Temporary seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3B. e). Once temporary seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above. Permanent Cover: Upon completion of finish grading and/or placement of topsoil, initiation of the placement of permanent cover shall begin immediate) over all exposed areas. This includes areas designated for impervious surfacing fie: buildings, pavements/gravel ravel Y P g p g( g.p /g bases, sidewalks, etc.). Where the construction schedule will not allow for the placement of the permanent impervious surfacing within 7 days of the completion of finish grading, temporary cover shall be provided in these areas, as described above, until the permanent impervious surfacing can be constructed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water, shall be provided with permanent cover within 24 hours of connection. Areas designated for permanent turf establishment shall be provided with one or more of the following BMPs (see plan): 1). Permanent Seeding with Mulch a). Unless otherwise noted on the plans, all areas designated for turf establishment shall be provided with permanent seeding. b). In addition to the plan included as part of this SWPPP, the Contractor shall verify if a Landscaping Plan has been included in the plans by the Architect. If a Landscape Architect has specified higher quality permanent cover (ie: sod, hydroseeding, etc.), the Contractor shall provide this permanent cover in lieu of the permanent seeding specified in this SWPPP. c). Prior to the sowing of permanent seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2574. d). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mix 25-131 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for permanent seeding. e). Permanent seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.313. f). Once permanent seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above (under Temporary Cover), unless noted otherwise. 2). Erosion Control Blanket a). Erosion control blanket shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. These areas shall still be provided with permanent seeding, as described above, beneath the erosion control blanket. b). Erosion control blanket shall meet the requirements indicated in MNDOT Spec. 3885. See plan for category(s) of erosion control blanket. c). Erosion control blanket shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3G2. d). Erosion control blanket specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading (including permanent seeding). 3). Riprap a). Riprap shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). All riprap shall be underlain with Type 4 geotextile fabric. The fabric shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 251 1.3B2. c). Riprap materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3601, and shall be Class 3, unless noted otherwise on the plans. d). Riprap shall be considered "Random Riprap" and shall be placed as per MNDOT Spec. 251 1. e). Although it is permitted for the riprap to be placed with machinery, it will be necessary for the Contractor to hand place some of the riprap in order to provide a dense, well -keyed layer of stones with the least practical quantity of void space. f). The minimum thickness of the riprap shall be 18 inches, unless otherwise noted on the plans. g). Riprap designated at the end of pipe outlets shall be placed within 24 hours of installation of the pipe outlet end section. h). Riprap specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading. Sediment Control The following sediment control BMPs shall be implemented as part of this project: 1). Silt Fence a). Silt fence shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Silt fence shall be machine sliced and materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). Silt fence shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3132. d). Silt fence shall be installed prior to any upgradient grading operations, and shall remain in place and maintained adequately until upgradient areas achieve Final Stabilization (see below) e). Silt fence shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment on the upstream side of the fence reaches 1 /3 of the height of the fence. Repair or replacement of silt fence shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. f). Portions of silt fence may be removed to accommodate short-term activities, such as vehicle passage. Short-term activities shall be completed as quickly as possible, and new silt fence installed immediate) after completion of the short-term activity. p q Y P Y P Y If rainfall is imminent or forecasted in the near future, new silt shall be installed regardless of if the short term activity has been completed or not. The Contractor is advised to schedule short term activities during dry weather as much as practicable. No additional compensation will be paid due to additional silt fence associated with short-term activities. g). Temporary soil stockpiles shall be placed on the site in areas upgradient from silt fence. Where the Contractor chooses to place temporary soil stockpiles outside designated silt fenced areas, the stockpiles shall be surrounded by additional silt fence. Under no circumstances shall temporary soil stockpiles be placed over surface waters, curb and gutter, catch basins, culvert inlets or outlets, or ditches. 2). Catch Basin Protection a). WIMCO Road Drain protection devices, as manufactured by WIMCO, shall be used for catch basin protection on this project. WIMCO can be contacted at (952)-233-3055, and their web page is www.roaddrain.com. b). "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be installed at all catch basin locations immediately after placement of the catch basin structures. "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until permanent surfacing is constructed (ie: curb and gutter, pavements, and/or gravel surfacing). In areas designated for turf establishment, "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas is established. c). Upon construction of the permanent surfacing, the "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be replaced with the WIMCO product specified on the plans. The WIMCO devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). The contractor shall install and maintain the catch basin protection devices as per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. 3). Culvert Inlet Protection a). Culvert inlet protection shall be provided at all culvert inlet locations immediately after construction of the culvert. See plan included in this SWPPP for culvert inlet locations. b). Culvert inlet protection shall consist of the SedJacket, as manufactured by SedCatch Environmental Products. SedCatch Environmental Products can be contacted at (937)-435-5075, and their web page is https://sedcatch.com/collections/sedjacket. c). The culvert inlet protection shall remain in place and adequately maintained until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). Culvert inlet protection shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment reaches 1 /2 of the height of the SedJacket device fabric. Repair or replacement of culvert inlet protection shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. 4). Temporary Rock Construction Entrance a). Temporary rock construction entrances shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. See detail for temporary rock entrance design. b). If the Contractor chooses to access the site from locations other than where temporary rock entrances are specified on the plans, additional temporary rock entrances shall be placed at these locations, as well. c). Temporary rock entrance shall be constructed prior to the start of grading operations, and shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until Final Stabilization has been established. d). Temporary rock entrances shall be maintained in such a manner that the entrances prevent sediment tracking onto adjacent streets. If a temporary rock entrance is found to be ineffective, it shall be replaced or improved within 24 hours of discovery. e). The Contractor has the option to place Type 4 geotextile fabric beneath the temporary rock entrance. The fabric may extend the life of the entrance as it will reduce rock "sinking" into the underlying soils. If the Contractor chooses to use fabric, it should meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 251 1.3B2. f). If sediment tracking from the site is discovered on adjacent streets, the sediment shall be removed with a street sweeper or other approved method within 24 hours of discovery. This shall be done throughout construction of the project. This sediment may be returned and graded over exposed areas of the site, or disposed of off site per MPCA requirements. The City may order street sweeping to be performed at the Contractor's or Owner's expense if City staff find that construction activities are resulting in sediment or debris being tracked onto City streets. 5). Filter Logs a). Filter logs shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Filter logs shall consist of Type Wood Fiber biorolls and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3897. c). Filter logs shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3F. d). Filter logs shall be installed immediately after placement of erosion control blanket. e). Filter logs shall remain in place for the life of the project, and shall be allowed to degrade naturally. Dewaterinq If dewatering of sandy subsoils is required for this project, the pump discharge shall be treated prior to discharge off -site or into a surface water. Treatment of discharge shall be achieved with the use of a "Dandy Dewatering Bag" (or approved equivalent), as manufactured by Dandy Products,lnc. Dandy Products, Inc. can be contacted at (877) 307-0141, and their web page is www.dandyproducts.com. The "Dandy Dewatering Bag" shall be installed, utilized, and maintained per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. Once dewatering water has been treated, it may be discharged off -site or to a surface water. The discharge shall be visually checked to ensure that it is relatively clean and not visibly different from any receiving waters. If discharge is noticeably "dirty", the Engineer shall be contacted as additional treatment methods may be necessary. Adequate erosion control shall be provided at the point of discharge if it is located in an area with exposed soils or established turf. This erosion control may consist of temporarily placed rip rap, or other approved energy dissipation measures. The type of erosion control measure shall be at the Contractor's discretion, depending on the location of the dewatering discharge and the unique site characteristics. The erosion control measures shall be effective and shall be maintained adequately such that no erosion occurs at the point of discharge. ESTIMATED QUANTITIES ESTIMATED BMP QUANTITIES ITEM QUANTITY Temporary Seeding & Mulch 4.0 Acres Permanent Seeding & Mulch 0.87 Acres Silt Fence/Sediment Control Log 1,850 LF Temporary Rock Constr. Entrance 2 EA Catch Basin Protection 27 EA Category 20 ECB 520 SY * Note: Estimated quantities shown above indicate one application of the associated BMP. Additional quantity of BMP over what is indicated above may be required for maintenance of each BMP. Good housekeeping by the Contractor will likly result in less quantity required. Pollution Prevention Management Solid waste accumulated during construction, including collected sediment, construction materials, floating debris, construction debris, paper, plastics, and other solid wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA disposal requirements: 1). Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by a similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with storm water. 2). Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. 3). Hazardous materials, toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum -based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) shall be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access storage areas shall be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials shall be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. 4). Solid waste shall be stored, collected and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. 5). Portable toilets shall be positioned so that the are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over. Sanitary waste must be 1 p Y PP Y disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. The Contractor shall take steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. The Contractor shall conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. The Contractor shall ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled materials. The Contractor shall report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. § 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. If the Contractor washes the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing shall be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff from the washing area shall be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity shall be properly disposed of. The Contractor shall properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. No engine degreasing shall be allowed on site. The Contractor shall provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. The liquid and solid washout wastes shall not contact the ground, and the containment shall be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes shall be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. FINAL STABILIZATION Final Stabilization shall be considered established once the following requirements have been achieved: 1). All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. 2). The permanent storm water management system is constructed, and is operating as designed. Temporary or permanent sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins have been cleaned of any accumulated sediment. All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems and ditches are stabilized with permanent cover. 3). All temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs have been removed from the project site. BMPs designed to decompose on site may be left in place. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS The Contractor is solely responsible for the cleanup of any wetlands, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, other waters of the State (as defined by the MPCA's General Storm Water Permit), ground or roadway surfaces or other property damaged by construction activity related to this project. Besides the NPDES permit (MPCA General Storm Water Permit), the Contractor and/or Owner shall also be responsible to obtain all other necessary local government permits related to storm water management, and erosion and sediment control, if applicable (ie: Watershed District, City, MNDOT, etc.). This SWPPP is intended to provide a plan for addressing the erosion prevention and storm water management issues associated with this project. It is to be used in conjunction with the project plans, specifications, and the MPCA General Storm Water Permit. In addition to the SWPPP, the Owner, Contractor, and SWPPP Coordinator shall familiarize themselves with the actual requirements indicated in the MPCA General Storm Water Permit itself and are responsible for compliance with the permit's terms, requirements, and conditions. The Engineer can provide a copy of the permit upon request. N O01 N co O CO O 1 W W e , r 2 5 SCHULTZ ENGINEERING W & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 5; PH: (320) 339-0669 U FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Ir LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z O IZ O L.L O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE LICENSE NO.: 43129 Z DATE: xx/xx/2024 Ir REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 .J 1 xx/xx/2024 W Ir 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX C1 - STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES 0) 3 vi N 0 Z a_ a_ n N C6 N O N Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA-15 or CA-25 Riprop Bedding Geotextile fabric Original grade _ — O SECTION B-B (not to scale) Geotextile fG-. NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment trapping device Match Existing Grade J)LU I IUIN A —A (not to scale) Sediment Trapping Device _1-mil plates Original grade O � I Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates A A A A � o E Slope away from highway 24' min 50' min. or Right of Way PLAN Standard Plate Library City of Monticello � v N a O O /b rA I O O u 61 �. —a ~� Z a "I 1� 0 0 CM rn0 v ' Title: Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 03 -15 6002 EXISTING CURB PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG-23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. * FOR THE NEW R-3290—VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG-3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello STEEL FENCE POST (T—POST), BOTTOM OF MINIMUM 5' LONG, ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS DRAINAGE WAY 6' MAXIMUM SPACING. TH MINIMUM 3 ZIP TIES 50 LB. VNS19 PER POST TOP 8 OF F BRIC. a FABRIC7 LAMENT GEOTEXBLE o� ��L ,O FABRIC PER MNDE ICED) 3886-1 MACHINE SLICED). POST NOTCHE MACHINE SLICE TO FACE AWAY FROM FABRIC. 8"-12" DEPTH (PLUS 6" '' FLAP) ELEVATION POINTS A' SHOULD BE V HIGHER THAN POINTS "B" DIRECTION OF SURFACE �� �. A A 24" MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT :. B B NOTE: D COMPACTION: THE MACHINE SLICED METHOD (THIS DETAIL) IS THE AFTER "SLICING" IN THE FABRIC AND BEFORE INSTALLATION STANDARD SILT FENCE INSTALLATION METHOD. OF STEEL POSTS, DRIVE INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT OVER THE HEAVY—DUTY SILT FENCE INSTALLATION METHODS "SLICE" WHILE FABRIC IS LAYING ON THE GROUND. THEN SHOULD ONLY BE USED WHEN APPROVED OR DIRECTED INSTALL STEEL POSTS AND PULL UP FABRIC TO ATTACH AT BY THE CITY. A UNIFORM HEIGHT. MAINTAINANCE: 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL, AND ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED USEABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER MAY STILL BE NECESSARY, THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACE PROMPTLY. 3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT, THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. 4. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER IS NO LONGER REQUIRED, SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. -a i—A D o ;o 0 WINTER SUMMER � m D Placement of Sediment / Placement of Sediment o Filter Barrier 7' Behind Filter Barrier Along O Residential Curb or Behind Sidewalk Residential Curb I m O Driveway j Prior to Snow Plowing Driveway m v 1 Right of Way Entrance Right of Way Entrance / MD0 O 3 = 3 AZ ------------------ — ------------------- ------ —_------------- —-----Sidewadewalk lk o zpm — Concrete Concrete X DO m Curb & Gutter Curb & Gutter o§ a Street Street ? N O O O PLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SEDIMENT FILTER BARRIER OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT DEFLECTOR PLATE )P OF Y RB LY )INT I II VI I-1 LV YY 1 llUl\Ili Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 0 3 -15 6004 OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD 1 • • • • 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ® • II I a d 7 4 �r d A. d d d C�19q:7�SH4/b'l��l�I�69:I:A111� Standard Plate Library City of Monticello >� 10 lee0. II 3.3' L20 -4.6' r —0 q1 .1'.3' Y.3' 0.7 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 1.15 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 3.75 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 4:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES HIGH FLOW CHANNEL & SHORELINE �•�� �, Ii•Ii. � t ::i 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6' (15cm) DEEP X 6" (15cm) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12' (30cm) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12- (30om) PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM, STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2"-5" (5cm-12.5cm) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3" (7.5cm) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. NOTE: "IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6' (15m) MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 101 Title: Erosion Control Blanket Stapling Patterns & Installation Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised: 03 -15 6011 WING NUT ATTACHMENT HOOK SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 Title: Inlet Protection Grate Inlet Cover Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 0 3 -15 6005 It N O N co O O O W W J Q SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN 0 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 (� FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Itr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 o OBRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 OTC REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 -STANDARD DETAILS C3 -STANDARD DETAILS C4 -STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS D_ I N O C7 N NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR WORK WITHIN INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. (TYP) I ° : e ° ° ° e ° ° e ° ° ° °° o , ° ° ° ° °• ° °•° o ° INSTALL CATCH PERIMETER SILT v ° ° ° ° ° °° ° ° °° ° ° °�° ° ° BASIN PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) °°°° I (TYP)S v CATEGORY 20 TEMPORARY ROCK —CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL r PERIMETER SILT EROSION CONTROL CONSTRUCTION BLANKET \r INSTALL CATCH BA: FENCE (TYP) BLANKET ENTRANCE PROTECTION (TYP) INSTALL CATCH > INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION c rF > ' n > CATEGORY 20 BASIN PROTECTION r (TYP) EROSION CONTROL (TYP) �O `v a0 M BLANKET �v O I I v INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION (TYP) / n FM � FM F� L _� 59 M FM _ � _ I o �I It I i - --- — — — 4- _ - - _ - - .: _14 �11 _ _ _ -- 11 It VI Ol O c �� l �] 96 4! — r rtrxYaCxwk>C/y>l%?;lJ xx�a'>CJ�i.y` R^ _ — Il 1 .OnOn I J;! raina'ge tt tilit en 1962 CD 0 Lip c T !.A —IINV=951.25 )I rI -- — — — I( J -964 I6A INSTAI 4 IINSTALL COATCH 962 964 PROTE IN r I I —BASPTECTION �= 963.31 LEI] �N 88°47'24" 139.00 -19 959.38 %�INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION (TYP) / 64 I �096 96 - - Z96/ I v I INSTALL C�TCH a- 964 J BASIN PRd)TECTI ON I I - - (TYP) I I \ �. —7 I I I I PROPOSED BUILDING I I PROPOSED BUILDING / \ I FFE = 964.85 I I FFE = 964.85 PERIMETEr SILT I I FENCE (TY') I I — > 96601 —INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION �; I ° ° • ° ° ° • ° ° ° • °� Y I (TYP) v °_—� • ///°°° I I I INSTALL � CATEGORY 20 BASIN PROTECTION -e — , INSTALL CATCH EROSION CONTROL (TYP) T BASIN PROTECTION BLANKET _>PERIMETER S LT FENCE (TYP) E: CONTRA OR WkLL AIN ALL NECESSARY HITS FOR WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. I�177bt` i I RIM= 964.01 964 RIM= 965 9 (TYP) I/ I I�\\I TEMPORARY _ ROCK 'W= RI = 96 ENTRANCERIM= 964.24 IM= §I,9� INV= 953.CATEGORY 20 INV E/ = 951.69 964 IN E,CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL INV= 958.14 BLANKET 1 52. IN _ ) I = 949 2 11 ' �q / _ -----96-4IT) — — — G II 100 -------- _ � ° • ° F—� 964 O°Op O 964- --- --- — -- , a OiOO /V =—----------------— n - - Ilf� — — — — — — greys fit ressFasement I I I I _ er Doc. No 143369571 1 PERIMETER SILT PERIMETER SILT — — —�_--_ _------- -�----1 - FENCE TYP v INSTALL CATCH FENCE(TYP)I I BASIN PROTECTION Lr > > - CT (TYP) /� NOT A CONSTRUCTION RIM= 964. 10 PERIMETER SILT I I RIM= 3.97 I I i - �. - INSTALL CATCH 06 BASIN PROTECTION J ENTRANCE 964.43 INV= 955. �7 FENCE (TYP) - I -INSTALL CATCH RIM 964.RIM 959.98 ) I INV= 9 .26 BASIN PROTECTION (TYP) r^ (TYP) INV= 958.00 RIM= 964.88 I _j INV= 961.73 INSTALL CATCH NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BASIN PROTECTION OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION (TYP) FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER FOR WORK COMPLETED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. N O N C'7 O (0 O w W W J SCHULTZ ENGINEERING CD & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 > PH: (320) 339-0669 () FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Cr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS F- OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA O Iz 0 O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 0}C REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS © SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN SWPPP - PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1 "=30' I I I 0 30 60 �:3 EXISTING 0I ° • ° ^ ° ° e ` ° ° ° ° ° ° °°. o e EXISTING HYDRANT HYDRANT S CLEANOUT W/ RISER (SSCO2)-- v > -- - - > RIM = 963.90 r+r >> TOP INV OF RISER = 954.19 < --- r BOTTOM INV OF RISER = 947.15 ` - - FtA -J- FM " EXISTING / __=_ •- FM / - FI r / HYDRANT FM / CONNECT TO EXISTING ° : ° ° ' - tit' _------- FM / I O I I is DIP WATER STUB FM ow --- ------i- - - 131.00 - a I ------ - /-- ``i I I- J� -- ---------------- ----- --- -- �\ ----- i -----/ raina e 8 Wit Eas men - COIJNEC TO E CISTIN \ - �-� \ --- -+�- I I o / d 8" PI/C SAN. SEVER S 'UBEA - I o l o INV 947.15 \6\° l I lo o �a=-�5 FIELD VEFdFY) �� I 8" 45° BEND III ��/ _ - INV= 951.25 _ Q $„ DIP \ LEI ---- G °� I I �14 CI III I I I I I I DPI l I I CLEANOUT c!_11� 962 (2) 8" I45 I ° °° ° ° • I - = -RIM = 963.9� BENDS I \ ` \ 963.31 N 88 ° 47' 24" E 139.00 INV = 955.55 959.38 I I %o / I I I ,9 1996 \ �. SOT Z9 ��� I 1 � 6- t ��, - - - - < �° �� I I I I ) I �I I 8" 450 BEND CD II /` " ) o ! ! ° i _F I I I 1 8" DIP COMBINED WATER l I I I SERVICE W/ 8" GATE 8" PVC SAN. SERVICE / I \ I INV @ BLDG = 956.35 i I i VALVE &BOX I ' PROPOSED BUILDING I I I PROPOSED BUILDING I \ l FFE - 964.85 I I FFE = 964.85 w41 I I I I 966 I - - J I I I b I Iro on cy, .a -ADJUST EXISTING MANH LE o I I I I I NEW RIM = 964.50 BRIM= 964.24 I _ � , I I RIM= 964.01 \ RIM= 965.59 /���j�j��� I I � INV E W= V950.1 � - I ip / I - = I � I - . �4 2�1 I NV 953.99 INV E/W 951.69 � I I RIM 96 INV= 958.14 I = 45L.b� �1 11 - INV f`52.b9 c I I I I 6- iNv INV= 949 2 l - ----C-loo ------------ ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE IT)I��\II{\ l I I I J - - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - + -- -- - ---- NEW RIM=967.00 S I I . F - \\ I - I - -�� �-fi�� - -- -- -- -- - -- I - -- -- ----- -� I ---- I _ _ - �_ _ -- ---- -- * i • - _ - - _ - - -- - --- -_r ----------------- _ - I ------ ---- _ � I I --� }----------- - -----------.------------------------- !� ressFasement I I I 0368I 5 I *_J/�' I ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE NEW RIM = 964.75 EXISTING L _ ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE I ( EXISTING 111 HYDRANT ��� NEW RIM = 963.70 l HYDRANT T NOTE: EXISTING ST I RIM= 964,'0 RIM= 3.97 I ) ITRANSFORMER TO INV-- 9 I INV= 955. 7 " RELOCATED. RIM= 964.43 I 88 .26 . I INV= 959.98 INV= 958.00 v RIM= 964.88 � �i _F_INV= 961.73 l UTILITY NOTES: 1. WATER MAIN AND ANY WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 2. IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED WHERE WATER MAIN OR SERVICES CROSS EXISTING OR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, SERVICE LINES, OR STORM SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RAISED OR LOWERED APPROPRIATELY WHILE STILL MAINTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 3. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM SEWER CROSSES SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, OR ASSOCIATED SERVICES. INSULATION SHALL CONSIST OF AN 8-FT X 8-FT SQUARE OF 3"-THICK RIGID INSULATION. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE STORM SEWER AND PIPE CROSSING WITH THE EDGES OF THE INSULATION PARALLEL TO THE PIPING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. 4. INSTALL TRACER WIRE ALONG PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPE AS PER MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. https://www.mrwa.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/TracerW ireSpecGuideFi nalwebll.pdf 5. SEE SHEET C5 FOR STORM SEWER ELEVATIONS AND SLOPE, AND SHEET C2 & C3 FOR STANDARD DETAILS RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR STATE PLUMBING REVIEW, AND OBTAIN AN APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT FROM MNDLI, PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AFTER THE APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND ANY AND ALL PERTINENT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS AND IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO ORDER UTILITY MATERIALS AFTER APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM MNDLI It N O N C7 O O w W W J SCHULTZ ENGINEERING CID & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 5; PH: (320) 339-0669 (� FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Cr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS F- OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 Ir 0 O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 QREVISIONS Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS © SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN UTILITY PLAN SCALE: 1 "=30' 1 I 1 0 30 60 C9 RI .97--- IN = .26 MATCH E G BACK OF CURB� / MATCH EXISTING CURB CUT (TYP) RIM= V I 964.06 INV= 958.00 NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER FOR WORK COMPLETED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. e ease g e e l ee e e e e 9 ® e e o e e e NOTE: REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND CURB & GUTTER AS NECESSARY FOR NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK AND CURB & GUTTER AS NECESSARY PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. / V 1 • 1 J i� INV= 959.98 MATCH EXISTINC PAVEMENT (TYP) - - I�_.11 d' � F7 SIDEWALK (TYP) TRAIL (TYP) LADF. RAMP 4 10 MATCH EXISTING J III PER 3/C4 (TYP) BITUMINOUS TRAIL I (TYP) RIM= 964.88 -� INV= 961.73 —MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER (TYP) SURFACING NOTES: 1. SUBGRADES SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND COMPACTED AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN THE REQUIRED COMPACTION INDICATED IN THE GENERAL NOTES (SHEET Cl). TEST ROLLING OF THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR TECHNICIAN. LOCATIONS EXHIBITING EXCESSIVE RUTTING (PER MNDOT SPEC. 21 1 1) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE. COMPACTION TESTING IN UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM. 2. AGGREGATE BASE AND SURFACE COURSES SHALL BE ROLLED AND COMPACTED. TEST ROLLING OF THE AGGREGATE BASE AND/OR SURFACING SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY. MAXIMUM ALLOWED DEFLECTION DURING TEST ROLLING OF AGGREGATE BASE OR SURFACE COURSES SHALL BE 1/2". 3. ALL EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE EDGES, WHICH WILL ABUT NEW BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE SURFACING SHALL BE SAWCUT TO OBTAIN A VERTICAL EDGE. 4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE NEW CONCRETE ABUTS EXISTING CONCRETE, AND AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SEPARATE CONCRETE POURS ABUT EACH OTHER. 5. CONCRETE PAVEMENT OR APRONS, WHICH ABUT DOORWAY OPENINGS SHALL BE TIED TO THE FLOOR SLAB WITH #4 BARS ALONG THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE DOORWAY. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C3. 6. SEE SHEET C1 FOR SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF HARDSCAPES N O N C7 O / O ie"oolAr W J G °z° SCHULTZ ENGINEERING cn & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 U FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY rr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z O U rr O OBRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 J 1 xx/xx/2024 W rr 0_ 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS © SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX C1 -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN PAVING PLAN SCALE: 1 "=30' I I I 0 30 60 CIO STORM WATER CALCULATIONS FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA PROJECT NUMBER: 24024 Ph: (320) 339-0669 REVISIONS Fx: (866) 633-1830 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 18 South Riverside Ave, Suite 230 schultzeng@live.com Sartell, MN 56377 www.schultzengineeringdesign.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Brian J. Schultz DATE: 6/3/2024 REG. NO.: 43129 STORM WATER SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the following: 1. That proposed storm sewer is sufficiently sized to convey storm water runoff generated by the 10-year, 24-hour storm event per the Rational Method 2. That sufficient storage volume has been provided in a proposed StormTech underground storm water detention system to provide water quality and rate control for proposed impervious surfacing in excess of what was originally assumed for the Deephaven development. Impervious surface area originally assumed for the development of the proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites and Restaurant property was 75% of the total area, which equates to 1 18,200-SF. Water Quality and rate control for this 75% impervious area is provided for in an existing downstream storm water pond. Impervious surface area currently proposed for the Fairfield Inn & Suites and Restaurant project is equal to 83% of total area, which equates to 130,800-SF. A StormTech underground storm water detention system is proposed to provide water quality and rate control for the 12,600-SF of proposed impervious area in excess of the originally assumed impervious area. Storm Sewer Pipe Sizinq All proposed storm sewer pipe has been sized to convey runoff from a 10-year storm event. The Rational Method was utilized in preparing the associated calculations, which are attached. StormTech Underaround Storm Water Detention Svstem The StormTech system is designed to infiltrate the entire runoff volume generated from 1.1-inches of runoff (the water quality event) off proposed impervious surfacing in excess of 75% of the total site area. Furthermore, the StormTech system is designed such that overall proposed site runoff rates do not exceed overall existing site runoff rates for the 2, 10, and 100-year, 24-hour storm events from the excess impervious area. Site drainage has been modeled for 2, 10, and 100-year, 24-hour storm events. Our calculations assume that a typical 2-year storm event in this area of Monticello would be approximately 2.84 inches, a typical 10-year event would be 4.22 inches and a typical 100-year event would be 6.88 inches, as per NOAA Atlas 14 Rainfall Data. We have utilized HydroCAD software to generate hydraulic calculations, as shown on the following pages. Existing Soils Based on a geotechnical report completed by Terracon Consultants, Inc, dated 05/16/2024, the soils encountered at the site predominantly consist of 6 to 7 inches of topsoil overlaying 4 to 12 feet of fill material, as well as poorly graded sands (SP) and poorly -graded sands with silt (SP-SM). The surficial soils at the site are assumed to consist predominantly of Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) "B" soils for the purposes of calculating subcatchment (drainage area) runoff. The proposed StormTech system is designed to extend to depths, which will place it within the poorly graded sand (SP) soils. These soils are assumed to be Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) "A" soils, and have an assumed infiltration rate of 1.6 in/hr based Minnesota Storm Water Manuel. Ground Water Based on the above referenced geotechnical report completed by Terracon, ground water in the vicinity of the proposed StormTech system is assumed to exist below an elevation of 938.5, as ground water was not encountered in any of the borings. WATER QUALITY The StormTech system is proposed to meet MPCA and City of Monticello requirements for water quality, which specifies treatment of the first 1.1-inches of runoff off proposed impervious surfacing in excess of 75% of total site area for this particular project. Water quality calculations are shown below: Reauired Treatment Volume Proposed impervious surfacing in excess of 75% of total site area = 12,600-SF Required Infiltration Volume: 12,600 SF x 1.1-in = 1.155 cf Provided Treatment Volume Provided Infiltration StormTech Volume: • At 48" depth - from bottom of stone bedding to outlet pipe invert • See attached StormTech information sheets • Infiltration storage volume per chamber = 110.37 cf • Infiltration storage volume per cap = 86.45 ct Total number of chambers = 28 chambers Total number of caps = 4 caps Provided infiltration volume = 28 x 110.37 + 4 x 86.45 = 3430 cf Draw Down Time Design Infiltration Rate: 1.6 in/hr (HSG "A" infiltration rate) Maximum Time of Infiltration = 48 hrs. 0 min Design Time of Infiltration = 48 in (3.2-ft) / 1.6 in/hr = 30 hrs. 0 min (assumes full system to outlet) RATE CONTROL Existing Drainage The designated area which requires onsite storm water management consists of one drainage area EXISTI . EXISTI consists of the existing green area equal to the proposed areas draining to the StormTech system. The existing drainage area has the following calculated runoff rates from 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour storm events: EXSITING DRAINAGE Drainage Area 2-Year Runoff Rate 10-Year Runoff Rate 100-Year Runoff Rate (Cfs) (Cfs) (Cfs) EXISTI 0.10 0.46 1.47 Proposed Drainage The designated area chosen for onsite stormwater management consists of three drainage areas (DA). RA1 consists entirely of impervious area while DA1 1 and DA12 consist of both impervious and green areas which drain to the StormTech system via proposed storm sewer. Proposed drainage areas have the following calculated runoff rates from 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour storm events: PROPOSED DRAINAGE Drainage Area 2-Year Runoff Rate 10-Year Runoff Rate 100-Year Runoff Rate (Cfs) (Cfs) (Cfs) RA 1 0.41 0.62 1.01 DA 1 1 0.44 0.68 1.19 DA 12 0.29 0.45 0.80 The proposed StormTech system and associated outlet are designed such that designated area for onsite stormwater management runoff rates do not exceed existing site runoff rates of the same area for the 2, 10, and 100-year, 24-hour storm events. Data relating to the performance of the StormTech system during 2, 10, and 100-year, 24-hour storm events is shown in the tables below: STORMTECH SYSTEM ;MC-4500) Bottom of System 954.92 System Outlet 958.97 Top of System 961.67 2-year Peak Water Level 958.29 2-year Peak Oufflow Rate (cfs) 0.00 10-year Peak Water Level 959.35 10-year Peak Oufflow Rate (cfs) 0.29 100-year Peak Water Level 961.49 100-year Peak Outflow Rate (cfs) 1.43 The proposed runoff rates for the designated area are compared to existing runoff rates below. RUNOFF RATE COMPARISON (Designated Area) Storm Existing Runoff Rate (EXISTI) (cfs) Proposed Runoff Rate (MC-4500) (cfs) Event 2-Year 0.10 0.00 10-Year 0.46 0.29 100-Year 1.47 1.43 STORM SEWER DESIGN PROJECT NAME: Fairfield Inn & Suites YEAR STORM: 10 DATE: 5/31/2024 NOTE: Pipe lengths are from center of PROJECT LOCATION: Monticello, MN structure to center of structure DESIGN BY: NES MANNING'S "N" 0.010 CHECKED BY: BJS Structure Number Offset to Length Area Area Area Total Tc to Time I'll, Runoff Slope Pipe Capacity Velocity Upper Sump Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Structure PIPE NOTES From To Station Center Feet Acres "C" x"C" C x A Inlet in Pipe in/hr (cfs) % Dia. In. Q (cfs) V (fps) Invert Elevation Invert Casting Casting Build Cover Cover Dimension CLASS CB1 CB2 30 0.157 87 0.14 0.14 20.00 0.13 4.3 0.58 0.40 12 2.93 3.73 959.66 959.54 962.15 962.15 2.49 1.49 1.61 CB2 CB3 37 0.036 95 0.03 0.17 20.00 0.16 4.3 0.73 0.41 12 2.95 3.75 959.54 959.39 962.15 962.50 2.61 1.61 2.11 CB3 STMH1 212 0.237 94 0.22 0.39 20.00 0.94 4.3 1.68 0.30 15 4.61 3.76 959.39 958.75 962.50 963.35 3.11 1.86 3.35 CB4 STMH1 76 0.409 83 0.34 0.34 20.00 0.26 4.3 1.45 0.66 12 3.76 4.78 959.25 958.75 962.25 963.35 3.00 2.00 3.60 STMH1 CB5 40 0.000 0 0.00 0.73 20.00 0.16 4.3 3.12 0.30 18 7.48 4.23 958.75 958.63 963.35 962.80 4.60 3.10 2.67 CB5 CB6 70 0.330 81 0.27 1.00 20.00 0.28 4.3 4.26 0.30 18 7.48 4.23 958.63 958.42 962.80 963.00 4.17 2.67 3.08 CB6 STMH2 79 0.227 72 0.16 1.16 20.00 0.31 4.3 4.96 0.30 18 7.52 4.26 958.42 958.18 963.35 963.80 4.93 3.43 4.12 CB7A CB7 82 0.031 25 0.01 0.01 20.00 0.36 4.3 0.03 1.07 6 0.76 3.85 960.85 959.97 963.85 963.00 3.00 2.50 2.53 CB7 CB8 149 0.155 91 0.14 0.15 20.00 0.45 4.3 0.63 0.89 12 4.37 5.57 959.97 958.64 963.00 962.90 3.03 2.03 3.26 CB8 CB9 65 0.225 81 0.18 0.33 20.00 0.19 4.3 1.41 0.89 12 4.37 5.57 958.64 958.06 962.90 963.00 4.26 3.26 3.94 RA2 CB9 28 0.197 95 0.19 0.19 20.00 0.08 4.3 0.80 1.00 12 4.63 5.90 958.34 958.06 NA 963.00 NA NA 3.94 CB9 CB10 117 0.137 84 0.12 0.63 20.00 0.35 4.3 2.70 0.89 12 4.37 5.56 958.06 957.02 963.00 963.00 4.94 3.94 4.98 CB10 STMH3 122 0.375 81 0.30 0.94 20.00 0.31 4.3 3.99 0.89 15 7.93 6.47 957.02 955.93 963.00 963.00 5.98 4.73 5.82 ADS CB13 8 0.000 0 0.00 0.07 20.00 0.02 4.3 0.30 1.13 12 4.91 6.25 958.97 958.88 NA 963.80 NA NA 3.92 CB13 CB14 82 0.246 86 0.21 0.28 20.00 0.35 4.3 1.20 0.45 12 3.11 3.96 958.88 958.51 963.00 963.00 4.12 3.12 3.49 CB14 STMH2 74 0.359 88 0.32 0.60 20.00 0.31 4.3 2.55 0.45 12 3.09 3.94 958.51 958.18 963.00 NA 4.49 3.49 NA STMH2 18" STUB 56 0.000 0 0.00 1.76 20.00 0.21 4.3 7.50 0.32 18 7.74 4.38 958.18 958.00 963.80 964.06 5.62 4.12 4.56 STMH3 15" STUB 49 0.000 0 0.00 0.94 20.00 0.21 4.3 3.99 0.33 15 4.80 3.91 955.93 955.77 963.00 964.70 7.07 5.82 7.68 Printed: 10:58 AM, 6/3/2024 Page 1 of 1 M:\01272-03\Excel\24024 FFIS Monticello Rational Method PROPOSED DRAINAGE - RATIONAL METHOD =963.31 =959.38 �I SCALE: 1''=60' 60 - =963.31 =959.38 �I EXISTING DRAINAGE - HYDROCAD - -- r� Ls rre � — 139.00 13 ----_ Z91 ----- ---- ---- ----------- Drainage Et Utility Ease _ — ---- — — — \ ------ — , 65.32 \ I \ -- IT IM=959.08 =959,14 +--�JI INV=951 -_-_ N88°4T 24"E 139.00 � 960 06 958 I Z96 n I / I I I I I 1 I I / � I I ,✓ a l l......... • / (en ...... EXISTI n E � c .�• ...... .::: I\ III I kIM= 964.82RIM= 964.01 RIM= 965.59 RIM= 96\4A J INV= 953.99 INV E/W= 951.69 NV E/W= I P 950.1 RIM= 964.07-\I —� I— NV —S= 95V= 952.61 — — —— — -- -- -- -- _ --------- --- — I— NV--- 9-49—.4-2 100 _ ----- -- —---- r — a5ement J L -------- -- - --- ------ ----- rT ---- 4 3681 — —— r - - — n RIM= >3.97 u > > > > > RIM= 964 '0 R4.43 _ INV=955.;7 [ I I INV— 9 .26 <n RIM= 96� INV= 959.98 88 INV= 958.00 � lll��� RIM= 964.88 A — — INV= 961.73 PROPOSED DRAINAGE - HYDROCAD �- - ---- III`^"'Ill 0 =963.31 =959.38 �I SCALE: 1''=60' 60 EXIST1 SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 2-Yr Exist I Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 2-Yr Exist Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (s u bcatc h m e nt-numbers ) 0.515 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (EXIST1) 0.515 61 TOTAL AREA Paae 2 2-Yr Exist Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.515 HSG B EXIST1 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 0.515 TOTAL AREA 2-Yr Exist Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.515 Paae 4 Ground Subcatchment Cover Numbers >75% Grass cover, Good EXIST1 TOTAL AREA 2-Yr Exist MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 481 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment EXIST1: Runoff Area=0.515 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.31" Tc=20.0 min CN=61/0 Runoff=0.10 cfs 0.013 of Total Runoff Area = 0.515 ac Runoff Volume = 0.013 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.31" 100.00% Pervious = 0.515 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 2-Yr Exist MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment EXIST1: Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af, Depth> 0.31" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Area (ac) CN Description 0.515 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.515 61 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM EXIST1 SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 10-Yr Exist I Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10-Yr Exist Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (s u bcatc h m e nt-numbers ) 0.515 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (EXIST1) 0.515 61 TOTAL AREA Paae 2 10-Yr Exist Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.515 HSG B EXIST1 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 0.515 TOTAL AREA 10-Yr Exist Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.515 Paae 4 Ground Subcatchment Cover Numbers >75% Grass cover, Good EXIST1 TOTAL AREA 10-Yr Exist MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 481 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment EXIST1: Runoff Area=0.515 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.92" Tc=20.0 min CN=61/0 Runoff=0.46 cfs 0.040 of Total Runoff Area = 0.515 ac Runoff Volume = 0.040 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.92" 100.00% Pervious = 0.515 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 10-Yr Exist MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment EXIST1: Runoff = 0.46 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 0.040 af, Depth> 0.92" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Area (ac) CN Description 0.515 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.515 61 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM EXIST1 SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 100-Yr Exist I Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 100-Yr Exist Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (s u bcatc h m e nt-numbers ) 0.515 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (EXIST1) 0.515 61 TOTAL AREA Paae 2 100-Yr Exist Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.515 HSG B EXIST1 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 0.515 TOTAL AREA 100-Yr Exist Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.515 Paae 4 Ground Subcatchment Cover Numbers >75% Grass cover, Good EXIST1 TOTAL AREA 100-Yr Exist MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 481 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment EXIST1: Runoff Area=0.515 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.61" Tc=20.0 min CN=61/0 Runoff=1.47 cfs 0.112 of Total Runoff Area = 0.515 ac Runoff Volume = 0.112 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.61" 100.00% Pervious = 0.515 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 100-Yr Exist MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment EXIST1: Runoff = 1.47 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 0.112 af, Depth> 2.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Area (ac) CN Description 0.515 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.515 61 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM v CUL1 CB MC-4500 �— STMH1 a- 4DA11 StormTech System n DA12 4 SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for2-Yr Proposed I Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 2-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.088 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (DA11, DA12) 0.427 98 Paved parking, HSG B (DA11, DA12, RA1) 0.515 92 TOTAL AREA Paae 2 2-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.515 HSG B DA11, DA12, RA1 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 0.515 TOTAL AREA 2-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.088 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.088 >75% Grass cover, Good DA11, DA12 0.000 0.427 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.427 Paved parking DA11, DA12, RA1 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.515 TOTAL AREA 2-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In -Invert Out -Invert Length Slope n Width Diam/Height Inside -Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 CUL1 960.33 959.95 38.0 0.0100 0.010 0.0 8.0 0.0 2 CB11 960.85 959.95 90.0 0.0100 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 3 CB12 960.15 959.95 17.0 0.0118 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 4 MC-4500 958.97 958.88 10.0 0.0090 0.010 0.0 6.0 0.0 5 STM H 1 958.75 958.65 5.0 0.0200 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 2-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 481 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA11: Runoff Area=0.212 ac 76.89% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.07" Tc=20.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=0.44 cfs 0.037 of Subcatchment DA12: Runoff Area=0.146 ac 73.29% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.99" Tc=20.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=0.29 cfs 0.024 of Subcatchment RA1: Runoff Area=0.157 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.61" Tc=20.0 min CN=0/98 Runoff=0.41 cfs 0.034 of Reach CUU: Avg. Flow Depth=0.23' Max Vet=3.79 fps Inflow=0.41 cfs 0.034 of 8.0" Round Pipe n=0.010 L=38.0' S=0.0100 T Capacity=1.57 cfs Outflow=0.41 cfs 0.034 of Pond CB11: Peak Elev=961.18' Inflow=0.44 cfs 0.037 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=90.0' S=0.0100 T Outflow=0.44 cfs 0.037 of Pond CB12: Peak EIev=960.42' Inflow=0.29 cfs 0.024 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=17.0' S=0.0118 '/' Outflow=0.29 cfs 0.024 of Pond MC-4500: StormTech System Peak EIev=958.29' Storage=0.068 of Inflow=1.14 cfs 0.095 of Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.033 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.02 cfs 0.033 of Pond STMH1: Peak EIev=959.37' Inflow=1.14 cfs 0.095 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=5.0' S=0.0200 T Outflow=1.14 cfs 0.095 of Total Runoff Area = 0.515 ac Runoff Volume = 0.095 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.21" 17.09% Pervious = 0.088 ac 82.91% Impervious = 0.427 ac 2-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA11: MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Runoff = 0.44 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af, Depth> 2.07" Paae 7 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Area (ac) CN 0.163 98 0.049 61 0.212 89 0.049 61 0.163 98 Tc Length (min) (feet) 20.0 Runoff = Description Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B Weighted Average 23.11 % Pervious Area 76.89% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM Summary for Subcatchment DA12: 0.29 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.024 af, Depth> 1.99" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Area (ac) CN 0.107 98 0.039 61 0.146 88 0.039 61 0.107 98 Tc Length (min) (feet) 20.0 Runoff = Description Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B Weighted Average 26.71 % Pervious Area 73.29% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM Summary for Subcatchment RA1: 0.41 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Depth> 2.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Area (ac) CN Description 0.157 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.157 98 100.00% Impervious Area 2-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM Summary for Reach CUL1: Inflow Area = 0.157 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.61" Inflow = 0.41 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.034 of Outflow = 0.41 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.79 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min Avg. Velocity = 1.22 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.5 min Peak Storage= 4 cf @ 12.29 hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.23' , Surface Width= 0.64' Bank -Full Depth= 0.67' Flow Area= 0.3 sf, Capacity= 1.57 cfs 8.0" Round Pipe n= 0.010 Length= 38.0' Slope= 0.0100 '/' Inlet Invert= 960.33', Outlet Invert= 959.95' 0 Summary for Pond C11311: Inflow Area = 0.212 ac, 76.89% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.07" Inflow = 0.44 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.037 of Outflow = 0.44 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.44 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.037 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 961.18' @ 12.29 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 960.85' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 90.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 960.85' / 959.95' S= 0.0100 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.43 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=961.18' TW=959.37' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.43 cfs @ 1.94 fps) 2-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Pond CB12: Inflow Area = 0.146 ac, 73.29% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.99" Inflow = 0.29 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.024 of Outflow = 0.29 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.024 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.29 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.024 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 960.42' @ 12.29 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 960.15' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 17.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 960.15' / 959.95' S= 0.0118 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.29 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=960.42' TW=959.37' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.29 cfs @ 2.53 fps) Summary for Pond MC-4500: StormTech System Inflow Area = 0.515 ac, 82.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.21" Inflow = 1.14 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 0.02 cfs @ 10.15 hrs, Volume= 0.033 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 10.15 hrs, Volume= 0.033 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 958.29' @ 16.64 hrs Surf.Area= 0.028 ac Storage= 0.068 of Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 145.6 min ( 914.9 - 769.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 954.92' 0.048 of 19.42'W x 63.81'L x 6.75'H Prismatoid 0.192 of Overall - 0.072 of Embedded = 0.120 of x 40.0% Voids #2 955.67' 0.072 of ADS_StormTech MC-4500 b +Cap @ 4.03' L x 28 Inside #1 Effective Size= 90.4"W x 60.0"H => 26.46 sf x 4.03'L = 106.6 cf Overall Size= 100.0"W x 60.0"H x 4.33'L with 0.31' Overlap 28 Chambers in 2 Rows Cap Storaqe= +39.5 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 158.0 cf 0.120 of Total Available Storage Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.97' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.97' / 958.88' S= 0.0090 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010, Flow Area= 0.20 sf #2 Discarded 954.92' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 2-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 10.15 hrs HW=954.99' (Free Discharge) L2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=954.92' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond STMH1: Inflow Area = 0.515 ac, 82.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.21" Inflow = 1.14 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 1.14 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.14 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 959.37' @ 12.29 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.75' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 5.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.75' / 958.65' S= 0.0200 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=1.13 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=959.37' TW=956.60' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.13 cfs @ 3.16 fps) v CUL1 CB MC-4500 �— STMH1 a 4DA11 StormTech System n DA12 4 SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 10-Yr Proposed I Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (s u bcatc h m e nt-numbers ) 0.088 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (DA11, DA12) 0.427 98 Paved parking, HSG B (DA11, DA12, RA1) 0.515 92 TOTAL AREA Paae 2 10-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.515 HSG B DA11, DA12, RA1 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 0.515 TOTAL AREA 10-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.088 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.088 >75% Grass cover, Good DA11, DA12 0.000 0.427 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.427 Paved parking DA11, DA12, RA1 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.515 TOTAL AREA 10-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In -Invert Out -Invert Length Slope n Width Diam/Height Inside -Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 CUL1 960.33 959.95 38.0 0.0100 0.010 0.0 8.0 0.0 2 CB11 960.85 959.95 90.0 0.0100 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 3 CB12 960.15 959.95 17.0 0.0118 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 4 MC-4500 958.97 958.88 10.0 0.0090 0.010 0.0 6.0 0.0 5 STM H 1 958.75 958.65 5.0 0.0200 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 10-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 481 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA11: Runoff Area=0.212 ac 76.89% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.27" Tc=20.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=0.68 cfs 0.058 of Subcatchment DA12: Runoff Area=0.146 ac 73.29% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.16" Tc=20.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=0.45 cfs 0.039 of Subcatchment RA1: Runoff Area=0.157 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.98" Tc=20.0 min CN=0/98 Runoff=0.62 cfs 0.052 of Reach CUU: Avg. Flow Depth=0.29' Max Vet=4.23 fps Inflow=0.62 cfs 0.052 of 8.0" Round Pipe n=0.010 L=38.0' S=0.0100 T Capacity=1.57 cfs Outflow=0.62 cfs 0.052 of Pond CB11: Peak Elev=961.27' Inflow=0.68 cfs 0.058 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=90.0' S=0.0100 T Outflow=0.68 cfs 0.058 of Pond CB12: Peak EIev=960.50' Inflow=0.45 cfs 0.039 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=17.0' S=0.0118 '/' Outflow=0.45 cfs 0.039 of Pond MC-4500: StormTech System Peak EIev=959.35' Storage=0.089 of Inflow=1.76 cfs 0.148 of Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.036 of Primary=0.29 cfs 0.033 of Outflow=0.31 cfs 0.069 of Pond STMH1: Peak EIev=959.57' Inflow=1.76 cfs 0.148 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=5.0' S=0.0200 T Outflow=1.76 cfs 0.148 of Total Runoff Area = 0.515 ac Runoff Volume = 0.148 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.46" 17.09% Pervious = 0.088 ac 82.91% Impervious = 0.427 ac 10-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA11: MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Runoff = 0.68 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.058 af, Depth> 3.27" Paae 7 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Area (ac) CN 0.163 98 0.049 61 0.212 89 0.049 61 0.163 98 Tc Length (min) (feet) 20.0 Runoff = Description Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B Weighted Average 23.11 % Pervious Area 76.89% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM Summary for Subcatchment DA12: 0.45 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Depth> 3.16" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Area (ac) CN 0.107 98 0.039 61 0.146 88 0.039 61 0.107 98 Tc Length (min) (feet) 20.0 Runoff = Description Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B Weighted Average 26.71 % Pervious Area 73.29% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM Summary for Subcatchment RA1: 0.62 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.052 af, Depth> 3.98" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Area (ac) CN Description 0.157 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.157 98 100.00% Impervious Area 10-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM Summary for Reach CUL1: Inflow Area = 0.157 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.98" Inflow = 0.62 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.052 of Outflow = 0.62 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.052 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 4.23 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 1.37 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.5 min Peak Storage= 6 cf @ 12.29 hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.29' , Surface Width= 0.66' Bank -Full Depth= 0.67' Flow Area= 0.3 sf, Capacity= 1.57 cfs 8.0" Round Pipe n= 0.010 Length= 38.0' Slope= 0.0100 '/' Inlet Invert= 960.33', Outlet Invert= 959.95' 0 Summary for Pond C11311: Inflow Area = 0.212 ac, 76.89% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.27" Inflow = 0.68 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.058 of Outflow = 0.68 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.058 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.68 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.058 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 961.27' @ 12.29 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 960.85' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 90.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 960.85' / 959.95' S= 0.0100 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.68 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=961.27' TW=959.56' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.68 cfs @ 2.20 fps) 10-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Pond CB12: Inflow Area = 0.146 ac, 73.29% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.16" Inflow = 0.45 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.039 of Outflow = 0.45 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.45 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.039 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 960.50' @ 12.29 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 960.15' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 17.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 960.15' / 959.95' S= 0.0118 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.45 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=960.50' TW=959.56' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.45 cfs @ 2.78 fps) Summary for Pond MC-4500: StormTech System Inflow Area = 0.515 ac, 82.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.46" Inflow = 1.76 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.148 of Outflow = 0.31 cfs @ 12.90 hrs, Volume= 0.069 af, Atten= 82%, Lag= 36.4 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 9.20 hrs, Volume= 0.036 of Primary = 0.29 cfs @ 12.90 hrs, Volume= 0.033 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 959.35' @ 12.90 hrs Surf.Area= 0.028 ac Storage= 0.089 of Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 90.6 min ( 855.1 - 764.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 954.92' 0.048 of 19.42'W x 63.81'L x 6.75'H Prismatoid 0.192 of Overall - 0.072 of Embedded = 0.120 of x 40.0% Voids #2 955.67' 0.072 of ADS_StormTech MC-4500 b +Cap @ 4.03' L x 28 Inside #1 Effective Size= 90.4"W x 60.0"H => 26.46 sf x 4.03'L = 106.6 cf Overall Size= 100.0"W x 60.0"H x 4.33'L with 0.31' Overlap 28 Chambers in 2 Rows Cap Storaqe= +39.5 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 158.0 cf 0.120 of Total Available Storage Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.97' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.97' / 958.88' S= 0.0090 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010, Flow Area= 0.20 sf #2 Discarded 954.92' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 10-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 9.20 hrs HW=954.99' (Free Discharge) L2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.29 cfs @ 12.90 hrs HW=959.35' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.29 cfs @ 2.48 fps) Summary for Pond STMH1: Inflow Area = 0.515 ac, 82.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.46" Inflow = 1.76 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.148 of Outflow = 1.76 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.148 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.76 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.148 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 959.57' @ 12.29 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.75' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 5.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.75' / 958.65' S= 0.0200 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=1.74 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=959.56' TW=957.52' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.74 cfs @ 3.48 fps) v CUL1 CB MC-4500 �— STMH1 a- 4DA11 StormTech System n DA12 4 SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 100-Yr Proposed I Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 100-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (s u bcatc h m e nt-numbers ) 0.088 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (DA11, DA12) 0.427 98 Paved parking, HSG B (DA11, DA12, RA1) 0.515 92 TOTAL AREA Paae 2 100-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.515 HSG B DA11, DA12, RA1 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 0.515 TOTAL AREA 100-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.088 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.088 >75% Grass cover, Good DA11, DA12 0.000 0.427 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.427 Paved parking DA11, DA12, RA1 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.515 TOTAL AREA 100-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In -Invert Out -Invert Length Slope n Width Diam/Height Inside -Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 CUL1 960.33 959.95 38.0 0.0100 0.010 0.0 8.0 0.0 2 CB11 960.85 959.95 90.0 0.0100 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 3 CB12 960.15 959.95 17.0 0.0118 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 4 MC-4500 958.97 958.88 10.0 0.0090 0.010 0.0 6.0 0.0 5 STM H 1 958.75 958.65 5.0 0.0200 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 100-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 481 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA11: Runoff Area=0.212 ac 76.89% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.71" Tc=20.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=1.19 cfs 0.101 of Subcatchment DA12: Runoff Area=0.146 ac 73.29% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.56" Tc=20.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=0.80 cfs 0.068 of Subcatchment RA1: Runoff Area=0.157 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.64" Tc=20.0 min CN=0/98 Runoff=1.01 cfs 0.087 of Reach CUU: Avg. Flow Depth=0.39' Max Vet=4.78 fps Inflow=1.01 cfs 0.087 of 8.0" Round Pipe n=0.010 L=38.0' S=0.0100 T Capacity=1.57 cfs Outflow=1.01 cfs 0.087 of Pond CB11: Peak Elev=961.65' Inflow=1.19 cfs 0.101 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=90.0' S=0.0100 T Outflow=1.19 cfs 0.101 of Pond CB12: Peak Elev=961.61' Inflow=0.80 cfs 0.068 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=17.0' S=0.0118 '/' Outflow=0.80 cfs 0.068 of Pond MC-4500: StormTech System Peak Elev=961.49' Storage=0.118 of Inflow=3.01 cfs 0.255 of Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.039 of Primary=1.43 cfs 0.135 of Outflow=1.45 cfs 0.174 of Pond STMH1: Peak Elev=961.60' Inflow=3.01 cfs 0.255 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=5.0' S=0.0200 T Outflow=3.01 cfs 0.255 of Total Runoff Area = 0.515 ac Runoff Volume = 0.255 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.95" 17.09% Pervious = 0.088 ac 82.91% Impervious = 0.427 ac 100-Yr Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HydroCADO 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA11: MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Runoff = 1.19 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.101 af, Depth> 5.71" Paae 7 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Area (ac) CN 0.163 98 0.049 61 0.212 89 0.049 61 0.163 98 Tc Length (min) (feet) 20.0 Runoff = Description Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B Weighted Average 23.11 % Pervious Area 76.89% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM Summary for Subcatchment DA12: 0.80 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.068 af, Depth> 5.56" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Area (ac) CN 0.107 98 0.039 61 0.146 88 0.039 61 0.107 98 Tc Length (min) (feet) 20.0 Runoff = Description Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B Weighted Average 26.71 % Pervious Area 73.29% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM Summary for Subcatchment RA1: 1.01 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth> 6.64" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Area (ac) CN Description 0.157 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.157 98 100.00% Impervious Area 100-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, 20 MINUTE MINIMUM Summary for Reach CUU : Inflow Area = 0.157 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 6.64" Inflow = 1.01 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.087 of Outflow = 1.01 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 4.78 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 1.59 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.4 min Peak Storage= 8 cf @ 12.29 hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.39' , Surface Width= 0.66' Bank -Full Depth= 0.67' Flow Area= 0.3 sf, Capacity= 1.57 cfs 8.0" Round Pipe n= 0.010 Length= 38.0' Slope= 0.0100 7' Inlet Invert= 960.33', Outlet Invert= 959.95' O Summary for Pond C11311: Inflow Area = 0.212 ac, 76.89% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.71" Inflow = 1.19 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.101 of Outflow = 1.19 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.101 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.19 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.101 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 961.65' @ 12.62 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 960.85' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 90.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 960.85' / 959.95' S= 0.0100 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=1.18 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=961.42' TW=959.95' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.18 cfs @ 2.57 fps) 100-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Pond CB12: Inflow Area = 0.146 ac, 73.29% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.56" Inflow = 0.80 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.068 of Outflow = 0.80 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.068 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.80 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.068 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 961.61' @ 12.63 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 960.15' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 17.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 960.15' / 959.95' S= 0.0118 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.79 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=960.63' TW=959.95' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.79 cfs @ 3.12 fps) Summary for Pond MC-4500: StormTech System Inflow Area = 0.515 ac, 82.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.95" Inflow = 3.01 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.255 of Outflow = 1.45 cfs @ 12.56 hrs, Volume= 0.174 af, Atten= 52%, Lag= 16.0 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 6.20 hrs, Volume= 0.039 of Primary = 1.43 cfs @ 12.56 hrs, Volume= 0.135 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 961.49' @ 12.56 hrs Surf.Area= 0.028 ac Storage= 0.118 of Plug -Flow detention time= 130.7 min calculated for 0.174 of (68% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 56.8 min ( 816.4 - 759.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 954.92' 0.048 of 19.42'W x 63.81'L x 6.75'H Prismatoid 0.192 of Overall - 0.072 of Embedded = 0.120 of x 40.0% Voids #2 955.67' 0.072 of ADS_StormTech MC-4500 b +Cap @ 4.03' L x 28 Inside #1 Effective Size= 90.4"W x 60.0"H => 26.46 sf x 4.03'L = 106.6 cf Overall Size= 100.0"W x 60.0"H x 4.33'L with 0.31' Overlap 28 Chambers in 2 Rows Cap Storaqe= +39.5 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 158.0 cf 0.120 of Total Available Storage Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.97' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.97' / 958.88' S= 0.0090 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010, Flow Area= 0.20 sf #2 Discarded 954.92' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 100-Yr Proposed MSE 24-hr 3 Rainfall=6.88" Prepared by Schultz Engineering And Site Design HvdroCAD® 10.10-4b s/n 11475 © 2020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 6.20 hrs HW=954.99' (Free Discharge) L2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.42 cfs @ 12.56 hrs HW=961.49' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.42 cfs @ 7.25 fps) Summary for Pond STMH1: Inflow Area = 0.515 ac, 82.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.95" Inflow = 3.01 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.255 of Outflow = 3.01 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.255 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 3.01 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.255 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 961.60' @ 12.58 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.75' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 5.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.75' / 958.65' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=1.95 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=959.95' TW=959.68' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.95 cfs @ 2.48 fps) MAIM- mo,!= DEEPHAVEN 3 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and that Valley View Townhomes, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, as tenants in common and fee owners of the following described property situated in the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota to wit: Outlot A, DEEPHAVEN 2, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as DEEPHAVEN 3 and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, ha caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this Z11h day of Naffmofy . 20 Z Signed: Deephaven Development, LLC Mark Buchhoresident STATE OF N i I n 901 K01-0 COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this ? thday of Vf M)7(Y , 20 by Mark Buchholz, President of Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, CO S My commission expires t 7 IZC, erfifYu p (Notary Printed Name) County, my 1 yl lw y q-va In witness whereof said Valley View Townhomes, LLP, a Minnesota limited liabil' partnershi , has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 1/ , 20 Signed: Valley View Townhomes LLP Dale Buchholz, Managing Partner STATE OF WYM DAPIA COUNTY OF C OIL This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1Nq1 1 Ttt" 20 by Dale Buchholz, Managing Partner of Valley View Townhomes, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, on behalf of the partnership. Jftt-svv-- � (Notary Signature) Notary Public, My commission expires 1-1 8 K-LD m-ra—wriv (Notary Printed Name) SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I Samuel J. DeLeo do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this D�- Od day of I`tot/i?rj%01r• , 20 %` - Samuel J. DeLeo, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 40341 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS The foregoing Surveyor's Certification was acknowledged before me this :�-BPa day of Vi eV As- i s,- , 20 � by Samuel J. DeLeo, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License Number 40341. Sidney Theis . Notary Public Stearns County, Minnesota My commission expires January 31, 2027 CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Be it known that at a meeting held on this 4414 A day of %jAV1M 20 , the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, did hereby 6view and approve this- tat of DEEPHAVEN 3. t � By: Chairperson fix: I Secretary CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of DEEPHAVEN 3 was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day 16 O'C F C'V a0'0"0 of -1 20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Mayor City Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021 Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this J day of February 20 9. Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY LAND RECORDS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20_ -�3 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sectionuu272.12 there are no delinq nt taxes and transfer entered this tl($ day of 20 . ?A11 aluki" I %-I tp-A V right Coun Land Records Administrator WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this day of � , 2023, atjD o'clock P . M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. I , Sleeve R5a3 , as Document No. tv'7, Wright- C my Recorder KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING BRAINERD ST. CLOUD Sheet No. 1 of 2 Sheets C+� t U a.-k Plat DEEPHAVEN 3 / A/ 4 .' �•, . •• ` ` / T • i.r• I Not Tangent °�'`� X `�--——— — — —- / . , to , No Scale r wo w / ♦ r r ♦ I •»::..... :.�. r / / / .\ « r 3 "p \ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •• '� U.1 ry \ ' .: 1 — — —North Quarter comer of Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 i (Cast Iron Monument) t 1 �,:,r :,r : : : S,r : •S .5 ' L"v'i' i 18 ° 19' 38" : < •��• �; ,q� , R= 698.00 Cg: L= 223.27 Z - - - �`' CH- 222.32°02' 47' W S 88 ° 47' 24" W 643.05 ` ` :.„ ; ~: ~ / // ' S• J>►.':N'° =16F -1,l--13900 — — -------_.�—_ �— `'——N—o—— — — — — — — — — — I I — — — — — — — 1 t9I 50268 "3`00. Drainage &Utility Easement 41.00 •I n 1.000W 1 -- *_ -- - ��o _ frt�x;.•.;. •'''•' .,:::w «'• wv, too Z THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS TO a •. :;..• / �'�,, ( I o • ' z BE DEDICATED AS PART OF THIS PLAT ARE SHOWN AS THUS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: a•» •�,, ^)/ I I REAR LOT LINE �•t, • ^r/ 2 I I N 1 d I 4 ' ` N \•••• LLI S�--F I Cd ..;. ...z r f' I g I N�,° UNE I I ::.: «. . ,r; j / I I$ 1 1 BLOCK 1 I I o. -1 IZ ROAD 141 toti/'` \ S,4j� �•�,. �•'�=.�,. �3`'a ' i .. I I f0orn�m�tEasement DNENSIONSARE IN FEET •00 163,7�........ or dy age aid utility purposes • per Doc. No. 697451CB"1CH= 1E64362. Not 100 LM'I' y / 1'`•. `— I,' �It — — —— 275.81 Tangent ---Z ----_ _ -----� —420.47 I » : a. _ .,i I I N 88° 40' 21" E 831.87 :• / hg - - Not Tangen �� T { --' ; ; (� M I - - - - North -South Quarter Section Line /Per a�F$r -- `------------------------------•----i---..__ f-• I I 3 I �.- 1 Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 s / NO143�F� �- -- I - �$ �'�'` -See Detail A o I M I Ln r / Z I I I O/ � • I p CL 1100 1 E 1 I -- - - - - - - - - ---------- ,/ / ,,� I In LA 3 1 / / 1 I 1• -- . . M N • ' qR in �C3 / / �, / , z J. •------ - - - - -- r N 89 coo, 49 E 266 CIO 33 r N I 1 „ti r eV I I I ..l„ 1 .•••. � Q Z I I I - - - - -I ',49.07--.° '--------------------------r-------1--------------------- _ ...� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I ?, �;r I _ ---- N 89°00' 49" E 1003.40 1^ I 1 Z: N 89.00' 47" E (CEDAR STREET ADDITION) I r • •. I .r r •� ' I NOPT PLa I -I ? '•� t ' '\'•• 1 Vicinity Map NM'I' 01 A I'IEI� •••• :»•: •• •: »• .: i :«• :« : �'.:.r :.r :. • :.r : 't I M ., % I R I I I \o ',•t• a 01 "'o K---.LD KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING BRAINERD 3T. CLOUD ' MU'!1 Of I' A 1 cn I c I I 66 I - - - - LEGEND OF PROPERTY BOUNDARY SYMBOLS I �Z O IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED 'DELEO 40341" TO BESET I • FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 60 120 South Quarter corner of 10 Q GOVERNMENT SECTION CORNER MONUMENT Note: The underlying property defined by this plat of DEEPHAVEN 2 is subject to a blanket temporary easement for public pathway or trail purposes per document number 1432430. THE NORTH -SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SEC. 14, TWP. 121, RNG. 25 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 00*00' 32" WEST SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 60 FEET Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 i (Cast Iron Monument) - - ; • �Project I Location SEC 14, Tl 121, RNG 25 a W Z 0 J a NO SCALE Sheet No. 2 of 2 Sheets i i ♦ 177 `' i 1 � +I _ _� .� � -! / it �I1 I / If�l���� i;` a � 1: '.C. `f ��a � � @J�1� A � � ' i.1 • ��( �p�� / till � � .,�°t j� . / . 11J .'Us j�,� I..illllll �� 1 � II11 � � i?jo�lf- r r ` i � 93� � ��7�1f► Y;/ant IhUGrUI I ��c".; Pi %ice ^ J�,II .Y1�� ! I( - — -- - 1 / - - �..�. '� "iA�� ..�� ��� ij �y,'�rer�`�`- _ _„e'�►�-yi L'i�+r' I -DIY. �� .1' if��si�.�.���►�. �. � 1 al � - \ �--�tc"�'--- • u'= '.yj (��A�c�i�i�l,ll�(p141111i1 ii'��:� �u = � i�.i�%IIQII'i�llil:�"41����I� ` ff � L, Yfn�_ ^w 41 � puim�l •+l��`►'� % aVyA ill ":�Si r'i�r' �� -." � 1 Purpose The purpose of The Pointes at Cedar District (PCD) is to implement the goals, policies and specific design requirements of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan (SAP), a chapter of the Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan. In accordance with the SAP, the PCD ordinance establishes three subdistricts. Each subdistrict with its specific uses and development expectations are clustered around a separate pool of The Pointes at Cedar lake and its public spaces. Each subdistrict's public and private improvements are intended to be developed in accordance with the applicable "biome" concept as identified in The Pointes SAP. Architecture, landscape architecture, and all site elements are to be designed and constructed in consistency with the biome theme within which the site is located. The three subdistricts are: • Populus: Reflects Northern Minnesota coniferous forest areas • Tilia: Reflects Central Minnesota's Big Woods and more heavily popu- lated/developed regions • Quercus: Reflects Southwestern Minnesota's prairie and oak savanna Project proposals must demonstrate how they advance the goals of the SAP and the PCD District as a precondition of successful consideration. A finding by the City Council that the proposed development activity is inconsistent with the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan (SAP), or with this Ordinance, is grounds for denial of any application for such development. It is the exclusive role of the City Council, with consideration of recommendation and analysis from various advisory bodies of the City, including City staff, to determine whether a development proposal reaches the requirement of consistency with The Pointes SAP and this ordinance. A. Application of Ordinance The PCD applies to all private and public lands within the subject area of The Pointes Small Area Plan and as depicted on the PCD zoning map. The PCD zoning regulations establish compatibility requirements for prospec- tive development interests consistent with the intent of The Pointes SAP. The PCD regulates the uses, standards, and expectations of all new develop- ment in the District. Similarly, where this Ordinance is silent on any specific aspect of performance standards, the generally applicable regulations of the Zoning Ordinance shall apply, provided they do not conflict with the intent of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. The PCD regulations include specifically allowed uses. The uses listed herein are the complete list. The Community Development Department may evalu- ate proposed uses that are not specifically listed and make a determination as to whether a proposed use is both consistent with the listed uses and accept- able as related to land use compatibility and standards of development. The Community Development Department will make an administrative decision regarding such use determinations. The City Council shall consider, under the Zoning Ordinance appeal process, any disputes over such determinations. The PCD regulations also include finishing standards and graphic illustrations of examples of the scope and range of potentially suitable projects and site elements. While the District has minimum performance standards, it also is intended to inspire creativity within the themes of each "biome" sub -district. B. Conflicts Between Other Standards In cases where two or more ordinance standards conflict, this subsection shall apply. The determination as to which control applies shall be made by the Community Development Department. The following standards shall govern the Community Development Department and the Board of Adjustment and Appeals in issuing use interpretations: (a) Greater consistency with the goals and objectives contained within the adopted The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan; (b) A superior level of building form, design, or architecture; (c) Increased compatibility with adjacent development and surround ing community character; (d) Enhanced environmental quality and natural resource protection. C. Non -Conforming Uses Within the PCD zoning district, development and uses pre-exist the adoption of the PCD. These are considered legal non -conformities and may be con- tinued under the requirements of the applicable Zoning Ordinance sections regulating such uses and standards. Expansions or intensifications of existing uses may be considered but shall be subject to the Process Requirements of this Ordinance. 2 Pointes of Cedar District Process Requirements Project applications will be evaluated as to their consistency with the appli- cable PCD subdistrict regulations. Applicants should expect to understand the relevant goals and design values and elements of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan, explain their interpretation of those goals and standards, and identify in specific detail how their proposal comports with those goals and standards. This is an affirmative expectation of any application, and its design- ers, owners, and applicants. The PCD requires a distinct process for making application for development of any property within the district. (1) Pre -Application Prior to formal application, applicants are required to arrange one or more pre -application meetings with the Community Development Depart- ment, and other appropriate staff, to ensure that plan design and develop- ment starts off with the clearest set of goals. The pre -application meeting(s) will outline for the proposed applicant the evaluation and review process for Concept and Development Permit, and how projects may be enhanced to meet the goals of the SAP and PCD. At its sole discretion, Community Development staff may waive the pre -application requirement for a phased project which has received prior review under the PCD application process. (2) Concept Plan Submittal The Concept Plan Submittal provides the guiding framework for any devel- opment within the PCD. The Pointes SAP, along with the subsequent text and graphic representations of appropriate development in this ordinance establish a specific outline for development projects. Prior to submitting a Development Stage Permit application for the pro- posed development, submission of a Concept Plan is strongly encouraged. The Concept Plan shall be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council at a concurrent work session, as scheduled by the Community Development Department. The purpose of the Concept Plan joint meeting is to gain a common and thorough understanding of the project, how the proposed project com- plies with the general goals and specific requirements of The Pointes at Cedar SAP and the PCD regulations. Concept Plan submittal will require a significant amount of submission material for review and consideration to determine consistency with the SAP and PCD standards. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant Pointes at Cedar District to explain and illustrate how the project meets the goals and require- ments of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan and the requirements of The Pointes at Cedar District. Concept Plan Submittal consideration shall not run concurrent with the Development Stage application. A Concept Plan Submittal review grants no development rights. (a) Concept Plan Submittal Procedure: i. Concept Plan Submittals shall be considered by a joint meet- ing of the City Council and Planning Commission. Other City commissions or committees may participate upon request and identification by the Mayor, the Planning Commission Chair, or the Community Development Director. ii. The Joint meeting shall be public and noticed in the official newspaper and on the City's website. A mailed notice to property owners shall be required to all property owners in the PCD, and any other property owners within 350 feet of the subject parcel. iii. The joint meeting shall be held in worksession format and shall not be a formal public hearing. The Mayor may invite members of the public to speak on the matter as time allows, at the Mayor's discretion. iv. The submitter of the Concept Plan shall be provided an op- portunity to address the joint meeting, with time allotted as directed by the Mayor. V. City staff and/or consultants will provide an evaluation of the Concept Plan based on the following six categories: a) Consistency with the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan goals, design values and elements b) Use and Building Architecture (Principle and Accessory) c) Landscape Design and Elements d) Connectivity (Internal to the project site, to the public space, and to external points) e) Other Site and Building Elements (Utilities, Me- chanicals, Service Areas, Signage, Lighting, Etc.) f) Special Features (Outdoor Spaces, Art, Rooftop Elements, Sustainable Features, Etc.) vi. During the concurrent meeting, the Planning Commission and City Council may make comment on the merit, need- ed changes, and suggested conditions which may assist the proposer in future application for Development Stage Permit. 3 vii. The Planning Commission and City Council may also take comment from the public as part of the joint meeting. viii. The Council and Planning Commission shall make no for- mal decision as part of the consideration. The City Council and Planning Commission's comments are explicitly not an approval or decision on the project. ix. The Council and Planning Commission's feedback is intend- ed to provide feedback related to the submitter on the Con- cept Plan's consistency with the items in section iv above. X. Other elements may be identified as required as part of the Concept review or separate Development Stage Permit review. The Concept Plan comments do not necessarily constitute the entire list of elements that an applicant may be required to include. xi. Following the joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council, within 15 business days of the joint meeting, City staff shall provide the submitter with a summary report of the identifiable comments, terms and directions that the submitter shall consider as a part of a Development Stage Permit application. This report is not necessarily a summary of all requirements for further consideration, and may be reconsidered, supplemented, or amended by the City Council as the project proceeds through subsequent review. (b) Concept Plan Submission Requirements Completed submittal on the required City form. Narrative, including: • Explanation of the applicant's Relevant goals and stan- dards. • Explanation of the applicant's interpretation of the City goals and standards, and how the proposal comports with those goals and standards. • The Narrative must also include a listing of any PCD requirements that the applicant seeks to be modified un- der the development plan, and how those modifications are supported by the overall goals and objectives of the PCD and the Pointes Small Area Plan. • The Narrative shall further include a summary statement of the applicant's efforts to address each of the following six categories, which are not necessarily equal in weight of evaluation importance: a) Consistency with the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan goals and design values and elements b) Use and building architecture c) Landscape design and elements d) Connectivity e) Other site & building elements f) Special features iii. Site Plan Maps, including: a) Certificate of Survey signed by registered surveyor and dated within 6 months of application b) Preliminary topography (by survey, Lidar data, or similar source) c) Public and private utility locations and easements d) Site analysis map, with significant features, views, issues, etc. e) Concept Site Development Plan, with all proposed buildings, site improvements, setbacks, land cover (acreage of pervious/impervious) addressed f) Acreage tabulation for Lots, Blocks, Easements and Outlots g) Concept stormwater plan, including a focus on the capture, treatment, and return of stormwater to the central lake feature including impervious/pervious acreage iv. Proposed Buildings and Uses, including: a) Architecture addressing the specific PCD Biome setting. b) Proposed range of principal and accessory uses for each building and throughout site c) Preliminary building elevations from all exposures d) Preliminary 3-D perspective sketch/rendering of the site and buildings e) Preliminary schematic floor plans and square foot- age, including underground parking V. Proposed Site Landscape including: a) Preliminary plant materials addressing the specific biome setting b) General landscape ground covers (grasses, mulch, other plantings) c) Other surface treatments, including pavements and decorative pavement concepts, pedestrian areas, and other use areas d) Preliminary perspective sketch of landscape at full growth (may be incorporated into the Building and Use perspective sketch). 4 Pointes of Cedar District vi. Connectivity, including: a) Pedestrian connections internal to the project site and to adjacent private property b) Pedestrian connections to the public space central to The Pointes at Cedar c) Pedestrian connections to the external pedestrian/ multi -modal system surrounding The Pointes at Cedar vii. Other Proposed Elements, including: a) Preliminary plans addressing the location and de- sign for mechanicals and appurtenances, screening, signage, lighting, public and/or private utilities viii. Special Features descriptions, including artwork, noted vistas, patios, rooftop seating, public elements, and any other aspects of the proposed project that the applicant believes elevates the project above the standard require- ments. (3) Development Stage Permit A Development Stage Permit, for the purposes of this District, is a Condi- tional Use Permit, as authorized in MN Stat. Chapter 462.3595. Concept Plan submission consideration shall not run concurrent with the Development Stage application. If required, the platting process may run concurrent with the Development Stage application. Approval of a Development Stage Permit in the PCD grants development rights to a project application only once all required conditions of the City Council's approval have been met. Amendments to approved Development Stage Permits shall be considered under a specific process as outlined by this PCD ordinance. In accordance with MN Stat. Chapter 15.99, the City has 60 days from the date a n application for Development Stage Permit is found to be complete to make a decision as to approval or denial of a Development Stage Permit application. The City may, as allowed under the statute, extend the dead- line to a total of 120 days. (a) Development Stage Permit Procedure: i. The Development Stage Permit recommendation meet- ing shall be held by the Planning Commission and shall be public and noticed in the official newspaper and on the City's website, among other notice options. A mailed notice to property owners shall be required to all prop- erty owners in the PCD, and any other property owners within 350 feet of the subject parcel. ii. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing as a component of its consideration of Development Stage Permit review. iii. The applicant for Development Stage Permit shall be pro- vided an opportunity to address the public hearing, with time allotted as directed by the Chair. iv. The purpose of the Development Stage Permit review by Planning Commission is to gain a common and thorough understanding of the project, how the proposed project complies with the general goals and specific require- ments of the applicable City Plans, how the proposal responds to comments and requirements suggested by the Concept Permit and provide the Planning Commis- sion the opportunity to identify recommended changes, conditions, and elements to the City Council. V. The Planning Commission may seek and/or incorporate comments of other City commissions, committees, and/ or staff as an aspect of its review and recommendation. vi. City staff shall prepare a specific review of the Approved Concept Plan relative to the Development Stage appli- cation and an updated evaluation of the following six categories: a) Consistency with the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan goals, design values and elements b) Use and Building Architecture c) Landscape Design and Elements d) Connectivity e) Other Site & Building Elements f) Special Features vii. The Planning Commission shall make a recommenda- tion to the City Council as to approval or denial of the Development Stage Permit application, based on the evaluation of the application, and other comments. The Commission's recommendation, its' assigned conditions and findings for its recommendation shall be reported to the Council through its minutes and/or other report as its findings of fact for the record. Pointes at Cedar District 5 viii. Upon Planning Commission action on the Development Stage Permit application shall be considered by the City Council. ix. The City Council may invite comment from the applicant or any other persons, at its discretion. If it desires, the City Council may hold a separate public hearing on the matter if such a hearing is considered beneficial to the record. Such hearing be noticed in accordance with the notices provided for the Planning Commission public hearing. X. The City Council shall make a decision on the Develop- ment Stage Permit within the 60 day (or 120 day) period noted herein, unless the time is extended in writing by the applicant. xi. Any decision to approve a Development Stage Permit shall be in the form of an ordinance that amends the official Pointes at Cedar Planned Development District. The ordinance shall be considered passed when a simple majority of the number of the current City Council mem- bers votes in the affirmative. xii. The City Council shall adopt findings of fact supporting its decision on the Development Stage Permit, establishing the reasons for its approval or denial. xiii. In the event that the City Council denies a request for De- velopment Stage Permit, no further consideration of an application for a substantively similar proposal shall be made unless the applicant begins with a new request for Concept Permit. All timelines for decision making shall reset upon such application, as if no prior application had been made. xiv. A Development Stage Permit shall be effective only with the resolution of and compliance with all conditions of approval. Development Stage Permit plans meeting ap- proval conditions are a pre -requisite to Grading, Building or other land alteration permits. (b) Development Stage Permit Application Submission Require- ments. i. Completed Application on a City Application Form ii. Updated Narrative, demonstrating compliance with the terms and direction provided at the Concept Permit joint meeting and in City Staff's Concept Permit report, or ex- planation of any specific request for waiver of said terms and directions iii. Development Stage Plans a) Detailed utility services (sanitary sewer, water, storm water, grading, and any other plans required by the City engineer b) Fire service access planning, including fire vehicle routes and water sources, and any other plans re- quired by the Fire Marshall c) Other plans and detais as requested by the Commu- nity Development Department iv. Updated plans in each of the six categories required by the Concept Permit Application as follows: a) Consistency with the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan goals, design values and elements b) Use and Building Architecture c) Landscape Design and Elements d) Connectivity e) Other Site & Building Elements f) Special Features V. Parking plan, including proposed cross access and park- ing declarations, easements, and documents. vi. For residential projects, association and/or covenant documents. (4) Amendments to Development Stage Permit After approval of a PCD Development Stage Permit, no changes to the buildings, building materials, site plan or site development design or elements, landscape plan or materials, or any other aspect of the proj- ect area shall be made, except any approval of an amendment to the prior Development Stage approval. The process for amendment shall be as outlined in the PCD ordinance. (5) Administrative Adjustment Adjustments may be approved to an approved PCD Development Stage Permit where proposed changes are shown to be necessary to adopt to unanticipated site conditions and where such adjustments are minor in nature, including the substitution of a particular building material or site improvement for another simular approved material or improvement. Administrative Adjustments shall require submission of a request detailing the proposed change in both narrative and an update to any documents approved under the original PCD Develop- ment Stage permit. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to deem proposed changes as either administrative adjustments or as requiring an Amendment under subdivision (4) of this section. If the submission is accepted as an Administrative Adjust Pointes at Cedar District ment, the Community Development Department shall issue a decision within 30 calendar days of the full submission. (6) Variances and/or Planned Unit Development Variations The PCD is designed to incorporate a complete development package from any applicant as to uses, standards, and elements. Any such proposal in the PCD will be evaluated as a whole, rather than as a sum of its parts. As a result, no application for Variance (under the Zoning Ordinance variance process, Section 2.4(C)), or Planned Unit Develop- ment (under Zoning Ordinance PUD process, Section 2.4(0), is expect- ed to be necessary or appropriate. District Uses and General Regulations (1) Standards Applicable to All Uses (a) Any use not identified within the PCD shall be considered prohib- ited. (b) In the event that any finishing standard or design element of a proposed project is not specifically addressed by this district, the minimum requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance's Finishing Standards shall apply. The City reserves the right to increase or such standards to ensure consistency with the objec- tives and terms of the Small Area Plan and other standards of this ordinance. (c) Use Types. i. Commercial and public uses as identified herein will dominate the frontages along Chelsea Road, Cedar Street, and School Boulevard. ii. Along School Boulevard, especially toward the easter- ly portion of the district frontage, horizontal or vertical mixed -use shall be allowable, subject to the allowable Uses, Floor Area Ratios and Finishing Standards identi- fied by this ordinance along with public uses. iii. Residential and public uses as identified herein will dominate the frontages along Edmonson Avenue NE. (d) Appropriate access and transitions between private development area and public spaces shall be a required and integral part of the private projects. The City may work with the private developer to facilitate these access and transitional areas through grading ac- commodations or other improvements on public property when, in the discretion of the City Council, the project design justifies it. (e) Height. The district does not establish a minimum or maximum height for uses or buildings. (f) Site and building maintenance. Sites and buildings shall be maintained in accordance with City Ordinance 150. Violations are subject to the provisions of City Ordinance 10.99. (g) Joint Parking and Underground Parking elements. All projects are required to enter into a binding development agreement or other instrument as determined by the City Attorney to ensure that the minimum amount of surface parking required by the Concept and Development Stage Permit are available in common, and provide for parking lot maintenance on their respective land parcels. Nothing in this section is intended to preclude property owners from creating joint maintenance agreements, or to preclude the City (in its sole discretion) from creating a special maintenance district or other management tool for such purposes. i. Underground or similar structured parking provided for residential development shall be reserved for the private residential use of the residents and guests and shall be incorporated into the ownership and/or rent structures for said residents to ensure full utilization. H. A parking management plan shall be required for each property at the time of Development Stage applica- tion and may be incorporated into the City's approval for the benefit of the District with terms as approved by the City. iii. Public structured parking may be provided by the City for the benefit of any use or purpose and managed under its discretion. (h) Signage. Signage within the PCD shall be controlled and regulated to en -sure reasonable visual access to the uses in the district and ensure that signage is designed to be a visual complement to the district, avoid competition with signage necessary for public safety, and avoid unnecessary visual clutter. i. The allowances for sandwich board or other temporary signage per Chapter 4.5 (C)(7) shall apply to the PCD. ii. Monument -style freestanding signs only are allowed up to 14 feet in height, and 100 square feet per sign face. Pylon signs are prohibited in the PCD. iii. Additional signage may be permitted by the City when specific traffic management is necessary on a particular site, and provided such signage is constructed with ma- terials similar to that of the principal building with which the sign is associated. iv. Wall signage shall be allowed on all faces of commercial facilities, with a maximum total square footage of 20% of Pointes at Cedar District the silhouette area of the wall facing a single public street, (c) Permitted Principal Commercial Uses and where no more than 10% of any individual wall is covered. Each of these uses will be subject to the requirements of this district, v. Sign materials shall incorporate materials of the sub-dis- as well as the requirements of Chapter 5.2(E) of the City's Zoning Ordi- trict, including the use of stone in the base and frame of nance. Where such regulations conflict with the requirements of this the freestanding sign. district, the requirements of this Chapter will take precedence. vi. Other regulations of Chapter 4.5 of the Monticello Zon- ing Ordinance shall apply to development in this district. i. Retail stores Where the requirements for this district and Chapter 4.5 ii. Full -service Restaurants conflict, the requirements of this district shall apply. iii. Specialty Eating Establishments iv. Brew Pubs (2) Standards Applicable to Commercial Site Development V. Production Brewery w/Tap Rooms vi. Micro -distilleries w/Cocktail Room or Lounge (a) Minimum Lot Size, Lot Area, Setbacks vii. Commercial Lodging, excluding Boarding Houses No minimum lot dimensions or setbacks. Lot dimensions and set- viii. Bed and Breakfast backs (including building, parking, other setbacks) shall be deter- ix. Professional Offices mined as a component of the Development Stage Permit approval. X. Personal Services xi. Medical Clinics (b) Floor Area Ratio xii. Retail Service Uses A Floor Area Ratio (FAR) standard is applicable to the Commercial xiii. Day Care Centers - Commercial areas of the PCD. The FAR shall apply to the parcel being devel- xiv. Entertainment/Recreation — Indoor Commercial oped, including accessory parking being developed on adjoining xv. Event Centers parcels or outlots as may be platted and approved. FAR shall be xvi. Financial Institutions calculated by dividing the gross floor area of the building by the xvii. Temporary "cart" or "truck" -based food vendors gross lot area attributable to the project. Underground and struc- xviii. Public uses in Parks tured parking, required ponding, and public space set aside from (d) Permitted Commercial Accessory Uses the development areas and provided for public open space use, shall not be included in the FAR calculation. Each of these uses will be subject to the requirements of this district, i. Commercial lands fronting the public park/lakefront areas as well as the requirements of Chapter 5.2(E) of the City's Zoning Ordi- of the PCD shall maintain a minimum FAR of 0.4 for single nance. Where such regulations conflict with the requirements of this story buildings, 0.8 for two-story buildings, and 1.2 for district, the requirements of the PCD will take precedence. three story buildings or greater. Applicants shall provide the square foot ratio at concept level. i. Outdoor Seating ii. Commercial land not fronting the public park/lakefront ii. Outdoor Sidewalk Sales & Display areas of the PCD shall maintain a minimum FAR of 0.3 for iii. Outdoor Recreation, not including firing ranges single story buildings, 0.6 for two-story buildings, and 0.9 iv. Drive -Through Facilities, subject to the following re - for three story building or greater. quirements: iii. Floor Area Ratio may be used as a guide in mixed use 1. Restaurants and specialty eating establishments projects, however, the overall requirements for FAR and 2. Financial Institutions density will be set by the Concept and Development Stage 3. Pharmacies Permit. v. Trash Enclosures iv. Commercial uses should be designed to create access and vi. Signage (as permitted by the PCD ordinance only) exposure to both the primary public walkway/plaza areas, vii. Solar Energy Systems and the public street exposure areas where applicable. viii. Parking 8 Pointes of Cedar District (e) Commercial Site Finishing Standards iv m Parking. Joint parking and access over the parking lot areas serving the site is required and will be granted similar joint parking and access to adjoining property. Parking supply for private development must be calcu- lated at no less than 50% of the required parking in the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4.8., and no more than 65% of the required parking in that section. Private parking areas not subject to joint parking shall be reviewed and approved as part of the Development Stage permit. Landscaping Plan. A robust planting plan reflecting the requirements of the sub -district is expected. The plant- ing quantities of Chapter 4.1 (F) and (H) of the Monticel- lo Zoning Ordinance shall serve as a base requirement. The requirements for buffering in Chapter 4.1 (G) shall not be strictly applied, however, applicants should design projects with a sensitivity to the need to screen or buffer when incompatibilities are apparent between the proposed occupants of the project and the adjoining land uses. Landscape Standards. Landscape design in the PCD is a critical component of consistency with the goals of the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan. The SAP utilizes the "biome" concept as the basis for its design, and compatible landscape elements will required in confor- mance to the SAP goals. The PCD encourages a reliance on qualified landscape architecture in site planning to ensure compliance with the District goals. A successful landscape plan will be factored in the project review. A Site grading and land form, integration of stormwater management into the landscape design, and significant use of hardscape elements such as pedestrian and patio amenities and other active outdoor use areas will be re- quired for all development in the District. An emphasis on year-round use and interest will be required, Signage. Commercial signage in the district shall consist of monument -style and wall signage as defined by this ordinance. One monument sign shall be allowed for each approved driveway entrance from the primary access road. Consolidated monument sign displays are required for multiple tenant buildings and sites and as required for shared access parcels. Accessory Components and Appurtinant Uses, Struc- tures and Elements. These shall be designed and constructed to be consistent with the design and materials requirements in the various sub -districts. Every building shall be designed and constructed with attention to all external exposures, including loading, mechanical, and service components. Applicants shall make a particular effort to design service exposures and entrances to minimize the size of such spaces, blend them into the overall building and site design, and maximize the public exposure portions of the buildings. Operational aspects of the commercial uses and known tenants shall be a component of the management and review process. Pointes at Cedar District 9 LEGEND: RESIDENTIAL \` LAN COMMERCIAL MIXED USE � � 1 I I POD SUB -DISTRICT NORTHERN BIOME: POPULUS PCD SUB -DISTRICT CENTRAL BIOME: TILIA PCD SUB -DISTRICT EXISTING 0 Z SOUTHERN BIOME: QUERCUS (n W _ E TI MAJOR_ GATEWAY #2_— - EM.29WAA .lid �_\\o --------------- QUERCUS XISTIN (SECONDARY GATEWAY E E The Pointes at Cedar District o Monticello, MN H y March 28, 2022 1 WSB #:019376-000 N i 34 SECONDARY GATEWAY �«1 SECGATEWAYONDARY v1AJOR GATEWAY #3 105 ®®'per SECONbARY Coniferous Forest) The intent of the Populus Sub -district is to create an environment that is reflective of the Northern Minnesota lakes and woods region, with elements that range from the Lake Superior shoreline to the cabin and/ or resort lodge lakefronts. Buildings in the Populus Sub -district should suggest a north -woods theme in overall design and feel. The Pointes landscape will reflect this region with extensive rock outcroppings, pine, birch, spruce, and tamarack tree cover, and naturalized shrub -intensive landscapes with limited lawn grasses. The elements of design applicable to commercial and residential develop- iv ment for this subdistrict are as follows: (a) Architecture, Materials, and Architectural Details. Buildings will reflect a north -woods design and feel. Square or rectangular timbers shall serve as a theme for primary building components or prominent detailing. Wood -look components V. should be dominated by darker natural colors, with accent col- ors on detailing, balconies, window frames, and similar features. Extensive use of angular cut stone -face as a building feature is strongly encouraged, both on the building itself, as well as bases for structure support timbers and related features. Round -sur- faced fieldstone is discouraged, although rounded granite stone vi and boulder materials may serve as landscape features in areas used for dry stream -beds and drainageways. Attention should be paid to contrasting architectural features, including entry canopies, architectural metal components, and coordinating materials and colors throughout the project compo- nents. ii. Roof lines, eaves, roofing materials. Composite or asphalt vii. shingles, wood shakes, and metal standing seam products are considered representative materials for roofs in the district. Metal may be incorporated into the soffits, eaves, and facia, as well as featured areas where architectural metal treatments enhance the ability of the building to viii meet the intent of the sub -district. Roofs should be of a sloped design, and extensive use of gables, hipped roofs, and avoidance of a continuous roof ridge line will be required. ix. iii. Wall materials and mixes, window glass and window walls. A significant reliance on wood -look materials, with angular cut stone (especially granite or basalt) should be incorporated into building materials. Composite materi- als may be used (such as LP and fiber cement board) that simulate the look of authentic wood and manufactured cement products may be used that simulate the look of authentic stone, however, vinyl or panel style is not an acceptable material. Concrete masonry units should be visible only as part of foundation materials in locations of limited exposure and visibility. Glass should comprise a significant amount of the building walls. All sides of every building shall be carefully designed to include the ac- ceptable materials, and a significant component of stone treatment Window signage. Commercial uses should avoid the use of windows for signage display, with limited exceptions for "Open" or Hours of Operation announcements. Window signage is ideally placed in the door, or immediately adjoining windows to the public entrance(s) and shall be limited to no more than 25% of those windows. Screening of ground or roof mounted mechanicals. Mechanical equipment should be designed to minimize visibility from any viewpoint. When such equipment is visible, the project design should use site design elements that screen the views of such equipment with materials that incorporate the equipment with the building design. Balcony design and materials. Recessed or inset bal- conies on residential buildings that include overhead weather protection for the tenants are preferred. Pro- jecting balconies may be considered when all elements of the balcony design, including cover, support beams and timbers, and other elements contribute to the utility of the balcony, and the goals of the district. Balcony railings shall be coordinated to the other materials found in the building. Accessory building design and materials. Any accessory building, use, or element shall be designed to be compat- ible with the principal building and materials on the site, and these requirements. Site design should de-emphasize accessory buildings and uses. Lighting. Buildings and sites should emphasize decorative lighting features under eaves, and in landscape, patio, and walkway areas. Materials and design should reflect the themes utilized in the principal building. Usable outdoor spaces. These spaces should be incor- porated into the site planning. The outdoor use areas should be located so as to transition to the public outdoor Pointes at Cedar District 13 spaces and provide views to and from the outdoor use areas. Patios, pergolas, decks, and similar features will require appropriate landscape treatments, as well as light- ing that complements the use of the site, and views of the site from other property in the district. (b) Site Structures and Other Elements For site structures, including accessory buildings and uses, the ob- jective will be to minimize impacts of the accessory activity on the larger principal use of the property. For these structures and uses, materials and styles shall be used that complement and coordi- nate with those of the principal building and the biome concepts. Examples of site structures include, but are not limited to: • Service entrance treatments • Loading/trash areas or scheduling • Utility box screening • Parking lot design and lighting • Parking lot layout • Parking quantity and joint use requirements • Security lighting • Pedestrian lighting • Outdoor sales displays • Fencing and retaining wall requirements • Signage (c) Site Landscape Elements In the Populus sub -district, plant material selections should be centered on Pine, Spruce, Birch, Aspen, and Tamarack tree plant- ing, and those shrub and perennial plantings that may be com- monly found in northern climate areas of Minnesota. Planting areas that include extensive use of rock outcroppings, northern wildflowers and groundcovers, and in which lawn grasses are limited, are strongly encouraged. The following elements will be evaluated for conformance to the sub -district's intent. • Landscape materials — plants, mulches, groundcover, etc. • Landscape quantities • Landscape design • Site landforms and grading • Alternative stormwater design • Pedestrian connections • Pedestrian amenities • Site furniture • Landscape irrigation • Site and building lighting 14 Pointes of Cedar District THE POINTES AT CEDAR SMALL AREA PLAN NAC PLANNING wsB NORTHLAND PUBLIC FINANCE • 1 i I � I Is �* �• ��� '� �f I) ',7f:1'1�..�,�� '' ;�� �� J�h��ye�ii •i I �r �i ��,�`'�!��p� ' .r• �r (I ""� •�- �` �' � �., �j��1 I t � •�,v i1{li ul'^.+_�� t yt�.—`.�_� i� �.�t1�r� _� _ -- � . _ 1 Ap i I r THE POINTES AT CEDAR DESIGN GOALS A series of goals arose in response to the design challenges. They built on the early principles and evolved as new technical and policy information emerged. The following goals directly support the project vision and further guided ongoing design and policy work. • The Pointes at Cedar is a joint public -private venture. It is designed to enhance valuable commercial development potential and integrate a variety of residential opportunities surrounding a significant public space, including a usable water feature and a variety of upland spaces. • Residents, business owners, and employees may experience The Pointes at Cedar as a complete environment in which they can live, work, and recreate. The Pointes is also envisioned as a place that invites all members of the Monticello community and beyond to patronize its businesses and enjoy its open space features, both active and passive. • The Pointes at Cedar will present a distinct set of amenities within Monticello's larger park system, and the design will seek connectivity with the City's other assets. The Pointes at Cedar will also relate actively to the existing and future surrounding land use neighborhoods. • At the nearly 100-acre The Pointes at Cedar, a wide range of uses are supported and encouraged. Mixed use is most likely to be seen in the horizontal layout of interrelated uses, rather than vertical mixed -use buildings, although such buildings would be welcomed. In concept, The Pointes area anticipates commercial land uses to the west and north, transitioning to a mix of residential living environments to the east and south. • To achieve the vision of an exceptional development area, the City will consider higher intensity land usage in parts of the project than that commonly applied under the City's zoning or related ordinances, most often in conjunction with execution of desired amenities. Moreover, the higher intensity of land usage will have the beneficial effect of helping realize the feasibility of the amenities planned for the public spaces. • The Pointes at Cedar is envisioned to host a variety of housing: affordable options, modest -cost options, and luxury homes, in a variety of configurations of density, massing, and ownership. • To support the mixed -use neighborhood, desired commercial uses are those that promote high levels of employment and consist of or support hospitality and recreational uses. These include restaurants and entertainment venues. Due to the extensive exposure of the commercial buildings in The Pointes area, business building design and use will present a public face in all directions, with attention to architectural opportunities presented by the service portions of the buildings. • A unique transitional landscaping model reflecting Minnesota's biomes will guide the public and private spaces and their landscape design. Art, signage, architecture and other design elements are encouraged to reflect the biome construct. • Paramount will be the intention and ability to both value and take advantage of the public space investments that comprise the central focus of The Pointes at Cedar' design. PUBLIC MEETINGS & WORKSHOPS • October 21, 2019 —Joint City Council and Planning Commission Overview of The Pointes at Cedar Area & Concept Workshop • November 9, 2020 —City Council (Regular Meeting) Consideration of Authorization of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan • January 13, 2021 —Joint City Council and Economic Development Authority Small Area Plan Kick -Off Workshop • January 28, 2021 —Joint Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission Small Area Plan Kick -Off Workshop • March 8, 2021 —Joint City Council, Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Three Conceptual Layouts Design Workshop • April 28, 2021 - Joint City Council, Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission Site Tours — Maple Grove: Central Park, Edina: Centennial Lakes, Blaine: The Lakes • May 4, 2021 - Joint City Council, Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Preferred Concept, Standards and Naming Workshop • June 2, 2021 — Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Design & Vignettes • June 23, 2021—Joint City Council and Planning Commission The Pointes at Cedar Traffic Analysis Workshop • August 5, 2021 - Joint City Council, Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan Overview Workshop • September 23, 2021— Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan Adoption Recommendation — Comprehensive Plan Amendment • September 23, 2021— Planning Commission (Special Meeting) The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan Adoption Recommendation — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing • September 27 2021 - City Council (Regular Meeting) The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan Adoption — Comprehensive Plan Amendment * The Pointes at Cedar was selected as the final name of the project area in October 2021. 141Page Public and Private Space Intersection The intersection between public and private spaces will be critical within the project area. The expected density of development and use levels for the public portions of The Pointes area require thoughtful transition. With high intensity uses on both sides of the public -private boundary, conflicts can arise if these areas are not considered. In that regard, the basic design of the public space is intended to create a lake level and associated public pathway and other high -use spaces, which would be generally 8 to 10 feet below the finished floor elevation of the adjoining private land. This grade difference is envisioned to be supplemented with a combination of retaining walls and landscaping that creates a visual barrier between the paths and any first -floor residences, but which is also designed to retain views of the water surfaces from those residential buildings. By cutting the grade into the adjoining slopes, most residential views should extend over the paths to the water surface, while minimizing views of the land itself. As such, residential buildings should be able to design a reasonable level of privacy into their structures, while capitalizing on proximity to the public amenities. Private landscaping will augment the public installations to help create this separation. On the commercial side, it will be presumed that privacy is less of a factor, and that most business entities will choose a location in The Pointes at Cedar precisely for the exceptional exposure. To capitalize on this, the Plan envisions that many such business developments will utilize lower -level building space, in a "walk- out" fashion with primary access to Cedar Street above, and additional lower -level access to the public spaces below. PLAN EVOLUTION As the project design evolved, engagement with the property owners in the project area created a new opportunity. One of the primary landowners in the central portion of the study area indicated a willingness to convey his land to the City, rather than hold it further for development. As these discussions progressed, it was evident that certain elements of the layout could change to take better advantage of a revised ownership pattern. The most prominent of these was the location of the primary City park property — the "commons" of The Pointes at Cedar. In this initial scheme, the City park was located on current City -owned land along Cedar Street, north of Dundas. The primary driver of this location was the City's ownership, and an interest in maximizing private use of the then privately -owned property in the study area. With the City's pending purchase of the middle 35-acre area, relocating the City park area south of the self -storage facility along Cedar street created several new opportunities, including: • Relocating the created hill to the self -storage business boundary and utilizing that feature as a screening element between the public/private spaces and self -storage use; • Transferring the pavilion building to a place adjacent to the south bridge, at the junction of the central and south pools (see the biome discussions below); • Utilizing the powerline corridor that crosses the area for parking supply to serve both commercial uses south of the line and public uses north of the line — particularly as developed uses under the powerline are not feasible; • Relocating development opportunity from this south area north to the City's current 5-acre parcel with more prominent exposure and access; • Providing a commercial connection and "landing zone" for the Promenade pathway that leads from the Chelsea/Cedar Plaza into The Pointes area proper. In addition, the stormwater analysis yielded information on the depths and elevations required to achieve the desired lake effect. This required a different design strategy for incorporation of the previously constructed pond at Deephaven. The existing pond now becomes a feature of character reflecting the North pool's theme. The revised master plan takes advantage of these changes, reorienting the elements noted above, but retaining the primary biome organization from north to south. 241Page =10 `w r^ L b�iuur�imnrrt.� 0 251Page COMMERCIAL & PROFESSIONAL USES Density I Orientation I Relationship to Lake The Plan encourages commercial density within The Pointes at Cedar. The Plan anticipates that commercial uses will include those which maximize employment opportunity, as well as hospitality and recreational retail uses which take advantage of The Pointes' unique setting. Multi -story builds are encouraged, with high floor area ratios to increase commercial density. Similar to the residential uses, the Plan intends for commercial uses within the area to make the most of their access to the common amenities. Commercial uses should consider four-sided architecture where both street and lake frontages are present. Again, both physical and visual access to the lake will be a vital aspect of site and space planning. The City may consider reductions in overall parking requirements, flexibility on building setbacks or related site constraints and related improvements which further the goals of the project. The City will encourage pathway connections from and through the commercial properties, shared parking provisions and maintenance agreements. Shared parking and shared access conditions will be strongly encouraged to maximize commercial development density. On commercial properties, parking management plans will be a component of the development review. An aspect of this management plan will be to understand, and participate in, opportunities for cross -parking and public -use of those parking facilities in a way that will minimize interference with normal commercial parking demand. Wherever possible, commercial uses should utilize the public amenities to create outdoor dining, waterfront resting areas and connections to external parking and streets. Outdoor sales activities should be limited to festival and sidewalk sale -type events and spaces. 291Page UNIFYING DESIGN ELEMENTS & CONTRIBUTIONS PARKING AND SHARED/JOINT PARKING Vehicular parking is critical to successful business and residential communities, as well as maximizing the intensity of uses around the public areas. Attention to adequate and convenient parking will be examined closely as a factor in site planning review. It is emphasized, however, that overparking — particularly surface parking lots — will need to be minimized using shared parking areas wherever practicable. Extensive reliance on covered parking will be a requirement in residential projects and encouraged on commercial sites. Common parking areas that can be managed cooperatively are encouraged and will result in greater density allowances. In all areas, both residential and commercial, the City will seek underground, under - building, and/orshared structured parking to minimize the areas of the development properties devoted to automobile surface parking. For some, this will entail cross access and parking agreements (especially in the commercial zones), and in others, this will include flexibility as to parking design and investment in structured parking that fulfills these objectives. Sustainability measures, including electric vehicle charging stations, are further encouraged. CONSOLIDATED SIGNAGE The City will develop a signage system for The Pointes at Cedar, including identification and wayfinding. Private development in the district will be encouraged to incorporate elements of that system into its wayfinding and identification packages. This policy is not intended to create a single communication theme for all occupants of the district, and artistic variation is supported. However, particularly where private communication intersects with public uses or spaces, adherence to the City's design will be important. Signage throughout the area may incorporate signage elements specific to its biome. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND MATERIALS A diverse architectural environment is encouraged in The Pointes. The Plan anticipates that building and/or site development will draw from design themes reflective of the biome environment. Individual development design may choose other options but will be expected to respect the neighborhood in which it is located. However, it will be critical that all development, regardless of use, will incorporate high quality materials, creative architectural choices, and close attention to all aspects of the building and site being built upon. High quality building materials that consist significantly of masonry, glass, and similar materials are expected. In commercial development, lapped siding will be expected to be used in tightly limited exposures and primarily when designed to mimic wood finishes. Wall articulation, ornamental features, roofline variation, extensive window coverage, and four-sided architecture all are examples of the high expectations for development in the district. It is recommended that the City utilize PUD zoning to identify and encourage architectural character. Project design should be prepared to be reviewed as to its ability to conform to this expectation. ART Monticello is investing in a culture of creativity which encourages art in all forms — visual, literary, performance, and more. The integration of art throughout the public and private spaces of The Pointes at Cedar will enhance the central amenities and experience of all who live, work, and visit. Art will encourage exploration and enrich the space. Consistent with its other public improvement and park projects, the City will seek to incorporate art into both the built and programmed The Pointes at Cedar environment. LIGHTING The City will establish a common public lighting plan and design for The Pointes at Cedar. The plan will incorporate potential opportunities for unique branding of the area, but also with attention to existing lighting used in nearby areas. Lighting will include both pedestrian and general surface scale conditions. Private lighting is encouraged to reflect the styles and themes used in the public realm. Because The Pointes at Cedar is a mixed -use area of higher intensity land uses, attention must be paid to respecting adjoining land uses with the control of glare, light spread, and ambient light, balancing that with safety and need. ENTRY PLAZA Access to The Pointes land uses may occur from several points of entry surrounding the project area. In addition, the City plans an Entry Plaza at the corner of Cedar Street and Chelsea Road, creating a visual announcement of the district, along with access to its pedestrian and bicycle visitors. The plaza will serve as an initial gathering space, as well as a prominent wayfinding marker for passers-by on these two major roadways. Elements of the Entry Plaza may be mirrored in other entry points, as well as used as common thematic aspects of other public and private improvements. The plan of the Entry Plaza should introduce, and then allow repetition of, the public spaces that comprise the district, to avoid the appearance of private -only improvements. LANDSCAPING Both public and private landscaping elements are expected to reflect the biome model for The Pointes at Cedar. Landscaping is discussed in detail on page 33 through 38. 30 1 Page § 152.007 EXCEPTIONS. (A) When requesting a subdivision, combination, or recombination, if any of the following conditions exist, the subdivider is required to present accurately drawn site and certified survey plan information for the proposed subdivision, combination, or recombination, have the subdivision, combination, or recombination reviewed by the Planning Commission, reviewed and approved by the City Council, and adhere to the park dedication requirements of §§ 152.080 through 152.085. (1) A division which results in commercial or industrial parcels having an area of five acres or more with frontage on a public right-of-way measuring 300 feet or more and which does not result in the division of the parcel into two or more lots, any one of which is less than five acres in area or 300 feet in width and which does not necessitate the dedication of a public right -of- way. Such division shall not cause any structure on the lot to be in violation of the zoning ordinance or said new portions of lots to be in violation of city ordinance. (2) Division of one previously platted parcel into no more than two buildable parcels, both of which will be in full conformance with all applicable zoning regulations, and for which no public right- of -way, easements, or other drainage concerns are evident to the Zoning Administrator. (3) The adjustment of a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary and for which no public right-of-way, easements, or other drainage concerns are evident to the Zoning Administrator. (4) Division of an existing lot of record where the division is to permit the adding of a parcel of land to an abutting lot or lots and the newly created property line will not cause the other remaining portion of the lot to be in violation with this chapter or the zoning ordinance, and for which no public right-of-way, easements, or other drainage concerns are evident to the Zoning Administrator. (5) Combination of two or more parcels of record to create a parcel conforming to the requirements of the applicable zoning district and for which no public right-of-way, easements, or other drainage concerns are evident to the Zoning Administrator. (B) Any easements which become unnecessary as a result of the division or combination must be vacated. In addition, new easements must be established as determined by the City Engineer. (C) In the event that the County Recorder shall refuse to record an administrative subdivision due to the legal description of the proposed parcels or for any other reason, the applicant shall be required to comply with all of the requirements of §§ 152.026 and 152.040 for preliminary plats. MINUTES JOINT MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Monday, April 8, 2024 — 5:00 p.m. Monticello Community Center Planning Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck, Planning Commissioners Absent City Councilmembers Present: Staff Present: 1. Call to Order Rob Stark Chair Paul Konsor Mayor Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Sam Murdoff, Tracy Hinz, Lee Martie Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Rachel Leonard, Jennifer Schreiber, Sarah Rathlisberger, Jim Thares, Hayden Stensgard Planning Commission Vice Chair Andrew Tapper called the joint workshop meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission and City Council to order at 5:00 p.m. 2. Concept Plan Submittal for the Pointes at Cedar District for proposed Commercial Lodging and future Restaurant as Principal Uses in the Populus Sub -District. PIDs: 155-278-001030, 155-278-001040 Legal Description: Lots 3 & 4, Block 1, Deephaven Applicant: Ted Thompson Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview of the purpose of the meeting to the Planning Commission, City Council, and the public. The Pointes at Cedar District Zoning Ordinance allows applicants to have a joint concept meeting with the Planning Commission and City Council, without requiring a decision from the City Council regarding the development. Similar to the Planned Unit Development Concept Stage process, the joint workshop step provides an opportunity to the Planning Commission and City Council to give initial feedback on a development proposal without having to make a formal decision. While not a public hearing, mailed notice did go out to the surrounding property owners, and if time allows, members of the public may provide comment. City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission, City Council, and the public. Proposed on 2 lots near the southwest corner of Chelsea Road and Edmonson Avenue NE is a 98-room hotel, and future -phased restaurant within the northern biome (Populus) of the Pointes at Cedar District. The hotel brand was identified in the applicant's submittal as a Fairfield Inn by Marriot. Commissioner Tapper asked if the discussion in the meeting needed to focus at all on the restaurant, as the only information provided for the restaurant at that time was that there were plans to have one located next to the proposed hotel. Mr. Grittman clarified that the discussion should mainly focus on the detail the applicant had provided and that when restaurant plans were provided in connection with the proposed development, the Planning Commission and City Council would then have the opportunity to provide feedback. Though the applicants are not required to resubmit a concept plan submittal application, design and detail on the restaurant would require a development stage permit review. Rob Thompson, of C.I. Construction and the applicant team, noted that the plan is to build the hotel and restaurant at the same time. The reason for the lack of information on the restaurant was that discussions were further along with the hotel company than the restaurant. Ted Thompson, applicant of C.I. Construction, added that the process of constructing a hotel requires more time than the restaurant. Ms. Schumann clarified that the developer will be required to apply for a development stage permit in the Pointes at Cedar District for both the hotel and restaurant, though the restaurant is not included in the review of the concept plan. Commissioner Melissa Robeck asked what the current occupancy rate is for the existing hotels in Monticello. Ms. Schumann noted that information on occupancy rates can be found in the Hotel Studv completed in 2023. Rob Thompson added that they had conducted their own study prior to bringing forward the concept, and are confident that the project would be successful. Ted Thompson noted that within the concept is roughly an 80-foot-wide vacant parcel that would be available for development as well. At this time, there are no plans for development of the parcel. Any development of site would intend to complement the goals of the Pointes of Cedar district. Ted Thompson noted the applicant team was looking for feedback on commercial signage for the concept plan. Aware of the 14-foot maximum allowed within the Pointes at Cedar District, the applicants were looking for feedback on whether they could propose a pylon sign for the two facilities at a height of around 30 feet. Rob Thompson asked if there was a long-term plan to connect Edmonson Avenue NE and Oakwood Drive East. Ms. Schumann said there was no long-term plan to connect those two roads. Mayor Lloyd Hilgart asked if signage was the major concern with the items provided for the concept review. Rob Thompson said that it wasn't necessarily a major concern, just an area they would appreciate feedback on prior to submitting an application for a development stage permit. Mayor Hilgart asked if the property was located within the Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District. Mr. Grittman clarified that originally, these properties were included within the Freeway Bonus Sign district, but with the creation of the Poitnes at Cedar zoning district, they were removed. Mayor Hilgart asked what the district's sign limitations are. Mr. Grittman noted that the Pointes at Cedar District limits freestanding signage to monument signs at a max height of 14 feet, and maximum square footage of 100 square feet. Pylon signs are not permitted within the zoning district. Ted Thompson asked if the applicants were to propose a sign outside of the ordinance standard, how would they go about that? Ms. Schumann clarified that it would be applied for as a variance in companion with the Development Stage Permit application. Councilmember Sam Murdoff asked for clarification on whether there is additional developable land available within this proposed development. Ted Thompson said that there is a roughly 80-foot-wide piece of property to the west of the proposed development that would potentially be developed at a later date. There is a possibility that the remaining land area would be utilized to accommodate any outstanding needs of the original development, which remains unclear at this time. Councilmember Murdoff asked if there was any discussion on whether the hotel could be taller than 4 stories. Ted Thompson said that Marriot has a few designs for their Fairfield Inn hotels, none of which are taller than 4 stories. Mr. Thompson also noted the substantial cost increase for 5-story buildings over 4 stories. Commissioner Tapper noted that given the hotel would be 4 stories, the wall signage that would be on the building would provide exposure to the surrounding area, potentially as well as a pylon side. Rob Thompson clarified that exposure to the surrounding area was not necessarily a concern for the hotel, but rather the restaurant that would accompany the hotel. Councilmember Murdoff said that the project made sense with the given location, but expressed concerns with the lack of floor area. He asked if any of the projects within the Pointes at Cedar zoning district meet the requirements for floor area ratio. Ms. Schumann clarified that this is the first project reviewed against the provisions established in the Pointes at Cedar zoning district and did not know whether the existing development in the area would be able to meet the requirements. City Administrator Rachel Leonard noted that at the time of the development of the Pointes at Cedar zoning district language, assumptions for development density were made based on the master plan, with the intention of those decisions aligning with the ultimate goals of the area. As development proposals continue to be presented to the group for the Pointes at Cedar area, adjustments to the language may need to be made based on the practicality of developing the area realistically and successfully, particularly as related to accommodating desired uses within The Pointes. No action was taken on the item. 3. Adiournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 5:57 p.m. Recorded By: Hayden Stens and o Y g Date Approved: May 7, 2024 ATTEST: And munity Development Director CD 0 LO v> N EA N N 7 0 9 (_@ +:0 :$7 A #$%&'()' )'%(:=>:Q *A)B (=C$.0 +,C$. .9 +&))B&#$%&'( %>=>'<7: .6&.... AD :E@ 7.'. 6&B)B@%@ B&&(=@F% %%B.+ @@&@B%%% 0. (=@@B') )/%>)'&B% %&/%B ). 7. )'&B%% ('. )%@%&) )@=:%B )B&&:&"') %(=% E. G 6&&>%'B )BE@&= %=)&>. ? B &(=F?.) %)/&&B& &B%/%@&=. =B?B&+%&(=%&@B=BE :&' &@@.)&(=B&&@>") "&@ #$%&'()'G )%(:>G+,-%% ova • &'&)H&)B 2>1(= '&"B& 0.)%=)@B)-8 @ B'&'?% %'.$&-8@&& &%" @EB&&B '%@&% .; 00. &@B?:')B' @&C"=B &(=")%%%B ?C". 0.)%='@/%>C &&'?%. 07.)@H::% :':. %%&/% B. 0. )))@"& 0. $&:'%&%@& BC:= E&)@ &'@& 0".2@=@'. 0;. $:%B%&I&%& &%= A%-%&)@=@ 0. +&@'>")&@ B% 2%@%B&& @J/ 77J'.3%B%& @.J. %B'&B%@ @@.$'@=&%& 'B&=B. 2"2&B )@=&&(= E@J. "E&@ )@B@" • $&H@"B B+&'=&' %E@&$ (B. 2'%B&'):@)BB B&&@'. A)B #$%&'()'G )%(:>G+,-%% %7 # $ 0. E%B'%@C ')E=&(= . )B@,FB 'B&@' @92:')'&(=. . $&:'%&%@& =BC:= E&)@ &'@& )'@") =%.O;K 'B&BB&' B&B&7 K. . A%%@' )@.(&& @F'HB &@H%. 6&(=&'@= & B&)&= 6&(=:%@&(=:' @ &'.6&8B-%@A @='@ &%@E% &(=F B=B%& B& @A. +&&))@".F. 6B& B&&@&$ A+.& @@&. @. 6&(=BE)%@= B" "%B=@&== L')')@ &(=@)B. ;.)%)/&&B& @?% &(=F? >E=&(= &.6&&B)B') ). 2@=%%%. "%E $ 7. &B%@'?% )' A)B #$%&'()'G )%(:>G+,-%% A)B ova • 70. ,B#BAE@ & 6&"BE B%'@& ")'B&&E &(=F% 2'%B&'). 6&BB')) @@@@O.OK)& B')&%=& /%@ L@&/%&&') &. :' E &%%& ),• 1%)@@&„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a)& &H@&:&) "/=:7=':0 '?&: &='%="J@ %B&B= 0.-%&'?%", BUT. . &B'@% 7.?%'&)BB&' '&'@'?%. )' + B,EF )"C&) %B&&/% '@%&B @&"'%) =BE') %B&&, =':07'?&'007 @(:7: ";.6&@&" '•@@=B @@=B. BP% 0 7'?&'.6& '%=OJOJ B?&@@ 3@=@ #$%&'()'G )%(:>G+,-%% A)B . 6&)')@= Y. . 2@B/:="= &)&"')B' 000@=&)=E )B. <9.:.-. C% %&B/B&& Im STANDARDS AND REFERENCES Materials and construction methods specified in the plans reference the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction. The Contractor shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and review the specification sections applicable to the plans. It is mandatory that the Contractor be knowledgable of the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with the applicable specification sections. Contractor shall refer to the geotechnical report for additional requirements and recommendations. EARTHWORK NOTES PROTECTION 1) The Contractor shall maintain all benchmarks, monuments and other reference points. If any are disturbed or destroyed, they shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. 2). The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any unknown functioning underground utilities are discovered during the course of the project, which may interfere with construction. The Contractor shall wait for instructions before proceeding. 3) The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to functioning underground or overhead utility lines. Damaged utilities shall be repaired immediately and service restored at no additional cost to the Owner. 4) The Contractor shall provide barricades, shoring and other safety measures required by OSHA. 5) The Contractor shall protect all adjacent existing facilities from damage, including, but not limited to settlement due to excavations, erosion, etc. The Contractor shall be responsible for the repair of such damages. PROJECT CONDITIONS 1) The Contractor shall become familiar with the project site, and compare actual conditions in the field with those shown on the project drawings. The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any inconsistencies are found between the existing conditions and the project drawings. 2) No extra compensation will be allowed due to unusual conditions which could have reasonably been determined or anticipated by examination of the project site and project drawings. PLAN GRADES 1) Elevations shown on the project drawings are finished grade elevations, unless noted otherwise. Elevations not specifically indicated shall be determined by interpolation of uniform slope between spot elevations and/or contours, or between such points and existing elevations. Adequate slope shall be constructed to provide positive drainage away from structures. 2) If inconsistencies exist on the plans between contours and spot elevations, the spot elevations shall govern. TOPSOIL 1) Adequate imported and/or stockpiled salvageable topsoil shall be utilized for this project. 2) Topsoil shall be free of clay lumps, roots, brush, large stones, and debris, and shall have a minimum organic content of 5 percent. 3) Remove topsoil to its entire depth from areas, which are to be disturbed by new construction work. Existing lawn areas, which are not in the proposed construction area(s) shall remain in place. The Contractor shall field verify topsoil depths between any soil borings, and remove to greater depths than indicated in the soils report if such conditions are encountered. Salvaged topsoil shall be maintained in stockpiles. 4) Stockpiled topsoil shall only be used for finish grading of new lawn areas. Excess topsoil shall be removed from the site by the Contractor. 5) Protect all existing lawn areas, plantings, and other landscaping to remain in place. Any damaged areas shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. UNFORESEEN OBSTACLES 1) The Engineer shall be contacted immediately if any unforeseen major obstacles are encountered during excavation, such as abandoned wells, abandoned or functioning utilities, subsurface streams or rock, etc., which would add significant expense to the Contractor. 2) The Contractor shall still be responsible for completing all work required for this project where encountered conditions may be reasonably determined from a soils/geotechnical report and review of the project site and contract documents. DEWATERING 1) Surface drainage shall be provided during construction in a manner so as not to create a nuisance to adjacent areas. 2) All excavations shall be free of water during construction within the excavations. Dewatering shall be accomplished by pumping or trenching, and shall be conducted regardless of the cause, source, or nature of the water. 3) Berms, cofferdams, or piling shall be provided as necessary to protect excavations. 4) Excavations shall be sloped to drain, and necessary pumps, hoses and other equipment shall be provided to keep excavation free of water. 5) All temporary equipment used for dewatering shall be removed from the site when no longer necessary. FILLING AND GRADING 1) Rough grading of all areas within the construction limits, including adjacent transition areas shall be reasonably smooth and compacted. The rough graded subgrade surface generally shall not be more than 6 inches above or below the established subgrade elevations. All ditches, swales, and gutters shall be graded to drain adequately. The subgrade shall be evenly sloped to provide drainage away from building walls in all directions at a minimum slope of 1 %. The Contractor shall provide rounded transitions at top and bottom of banks and other breaks in grade. 2) Fill and backfill materials shall be inorganic soils free of roots, rocks, boulders, and debris. 3) Bedding material or granular backfill larger than 2" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 2 feet of new underground pipes. Material larger than 3" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 1 foot of subgrade elevation. 4) Imported compacted fill material shall have a maximum of 12 percent passing the #200 sieve, by weight. The proposed fill material shall be tested by an independent testing lab for suitability as compacted fill for this project. The Contractor shall pay for the testing services and provide a copy of the test results to the Engineer. 5) The Contractor shall fill and grade as necessary to bring surface to required elevations, and provide all materials necessary, whether obtained on or off the project site. 6) The Contractor shall place compacted material in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8" in depth for clay soils, and 12" in depth for sandy soils, and compact as required to achieve specified density. 7) Compaction shall be obtained with the use of vibratory rollers or rammers. During compaction, fill material shall contain moisture content, as necessary, for the required compaction as indicated by an independent testing laboratory. The moisture shall be uniform throughout each lift. If the material is too dry, water shall be added with approved equipment and methods, which will not wash out fine material. If the material is too wet, it shall be dried by harrowing, disking, blading, or other approved methods recommended by the independent testing laboratory. 8) Areas designated for pavement in excavated (cut) areas shall be scarified to a depth of 1 foot. The Contractor shall bring the subgrade material to optimum moisture content as indicated by the independent testing laboratory, and compact the subgrade to the specified density listed below for soils underneath pavements. 9) The Contractor shall not place fill material when either the fill material, or the material on which it is to be placed, is frozen. Any soft or yielding areas appearing in the fill resulting from frost, rain, or any other reason whatsoever shall be scarified, removed, recompacted and/or otherwise rectified to the satisfaction of the Engineer before any new fill is placed. COMPACTION TESTS 1) Utility Trench Backfill: The Contractor's independent soils technician and approved testing laboratory shall perform in -place density and moisture tests at random depths in trench backfill at 100 foot intervals, or fraction thereof. Compaction of trenches shall be a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density (as determined by the independent testing laboratory) in lawn areas, and at depths greater than 3 feet below areas designated for pavement. Compaction of trenches at depths within 3 feet of paved surfaces shall be a minimum of 100% of the maximum dry density. 2) Compacted Fill Under Pavements: Compaction tests shall not be required beneath new pavements. Adequate compaction of materials under pavements shall be determined by test rolling the subgrade, and checking for excessive rutting. Test rolling shall be performed as per MNDOT Spec. 21 1 1. 3) Areas exhibiting a failed compaction test shall be re -compacted and re-m tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to acceptance of the project. 4) Copies of all compaction testing and test roll observation reports shall be provided to the Engineer. 5) Optimum moisture -density relationship will be determined by testing laboratory in accordance with ASTM D698 and maximum density determination made by Method D of ASTM D698 unless otherwise noted in these specifications. SUBGRADE PREPARATION 1) Finished subgrade elevations shall be as follows: a) Light duty bituminous pavement: 9" below finish grade. b) Heavy duty bituminous pavement: 9�' below finish grade. c) Concrete pavement/apron: 12" below finish grade. d) Concrete sidewalk: 8" below finish grade. e) Lawn areas: 4" below finish grade. f) Planting areas: See Landscaping Plans/Details 2) The tolerance for areas to be paved shall not exceed 0.15 feet above or below plan subgrade. 3) The Contractor shall protect newly graded areas from erosion. Settlement or washing that occurs prior to acceptance of the Work shall be repaired and grades re-established. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS WASTE MATERIALS 1) The Contractor shall remove excess excavated material, debris, and waste materials, from the Owner's property and legally dispose of it in accordance with all governing codes. SPREADING TOPSOIL AND FINISH GRADING 1) Scarify subgrade to depth of 3" prior to placing topsoil. Spread topsoil evenly over complete subgrade as follows: a) Lawn Areas on Private Property: Spread 4" lightly compacted layer of topsoil. b) Lawn Areas in Public Right-of-way: Per City requirements c) Planting Areas: See Landscape Plan/Details 2) Finish grade accurately within 0.15 feet of finish grades shown on the project drawings, less the thickness of any sod where it is to be installed. Slope all grades away from buildings to provide positive drainage. 3) Prepare topsoil suitable to receive seed and/or sod. Grading of areas designated for topsoil shall be reasonably smooth and even, and in accordance with MNDOT Spec. 2105.3G and 2574.3A4. All debris and stones exceeding 3" in diameter shall be removed from the soil surface of these areas prior to seeding. Areas compacted by vehicles or storage of materials shall be plowed, disked and harrowed to match texture of other finish graded areas. 4) Grass seed shall be in accordance with MnDOT Spec. 3876, seed mix No. 25-131, applied at the rate of 220 pounds per acre or as indicated on the landscape plans. Mulch shall be applied and discanchored to all seeded areas and shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3882, Type 3 or as otherwise indicated by the Engineer. UTILITY NOTES STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1) The following standard specifications shall apply to this project: a) Minnesota Plumbing Code - MN Rules Chapter 4714 (MN Dept. of Labor and Industry-MNDLI) b) Uniform Plumbing Code, latest edition (UPC) c) "What you need to know about utility service connections in the 2015 Minnesota Plumbing Code" http://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PDF/pe_usc.pdf d) City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Standard Specifications e) American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) f) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) g) American Water Works Association (AWWA) h) Minnesota Department of Transportation "Standard Specifications for Construction" (MN/DOT) 2) The Contractor shall comply with all local ordinances and codes 3) Certifications of all utility materials, as well as shop drawings, shall be submitted to the Engineer for review POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - SANITARY 1) Smooth walled polyvinyl chloride pipe and fittings shall consist of SDR 26 or SDR 35 pipe, unless noted otherwise, and meet the requirements of ASTM D3034 and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) All pipe and fittings shall be SDR 35 for depths of up to 20 feet, and SDR 26 for depths exceeding 20'. 3) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. DUCTILE IRON (DIP) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Ductile iron pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A1 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.5 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. Stainless steel fasteners shall be prohibited. 3) 6' pipe shall be Class 52. 8" and larger pipe shall be Class 50. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (C900 PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Polyvinyl chloride pressure pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.4 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. GATE VALVES - WATER 1) Gate valves shall meet the requirements of Sections 261 1.2C and 261 1.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HYDRANTS - WATER 1) Hydrants shall meet the requirements of Sections 261 1.2B and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Hydrants shall be Waterous WB67, or approved equal BLOCKING AND ANCHORING - WATER 1) Water main blocking and anchoring shall meet the requirements of Section 261 1.3A4 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Provide thrust reaction blocking consisting of concrete with a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 2000 psi. 3) Place between undisturbed ground and the fitting to be anchored. Place thrust blocking so that the pipe and fitting joints are accessible for repair. 4) Mega -Lugs may be used in lieu of thrust block if allowed by local utility. WATER SERVICE PIPE AND CURB STOPS 1) Copper tubing for water services shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) HDPE pressure pipe for water services shall meet the requirements of ASTM D2239, ASTM D2737, ASTM D3035, AWWA C901, CSA B137.1, and Section 261 1.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Curb stops for water services Section 261 1.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) HDPE pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM F2306, and Section 2621.2A8 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Minimum wall thickness shall be 0.035 inches for 12 and 15 inch diameter pipe, and shall be 0.05 inches for 18 and 24 inch diameter pipe. 4) Storm sewer crossing above and within 10-ft of existing or proposed water main or services shall meet the requirements of schedule 40 PVC. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) PVC storm sewer pipe and fittings within 10-ft of a building and/or water pipe crossing, or when specified on the plans, shall consist of Schedule 40 PVC, and meet the requirements of ASTM D1785, ASTM D2665, and ASTM F794, and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) If further than 10-ft from a building and/or water pipe crossing, PVC storm sewer pipe and fittings may consist of SDR 26 or SDR 35 pipe, unless noted otherwise, and meet the requirements of ASTM D3034 and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) All pipe and fittings shall be SDR 35 for depths of up to 20 feet, and SDR 26 for depths exceeding 20'. 4) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWER PIPE (RCP) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) RCP pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM C76, and Section 2621.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) The ASTM strength class of pipe shall be Class III unless otherwise shown on the Plans. 4) The pipe shall be drawn together by some approved method of jacking or winching. This pressure must be maintained until sufficient backfill is placed to keep the joint from opening. END SECTIONS - STORM 1) End sections shall be provided at all pipe inlets and outlets. 2) The end sections shall consist of material matching the material of the pipe, which it is being connected to. Materials and joints shall be as per the specifications described above for the applicable pipe material. 3) The last 3 joints of RCP shall be tied, and the end section shall the be provided with an approved trash guard. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS - SANITARY AND STORM 1) Unless otherwise noted, manhole and catch basin structures shall consist of precast concrete, and meet the requirements of Section 719.6 of the UPC (sanitary only), and Sections 2621.2C and 2621.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Catch basins shall be provided with the following castings: a) Along curbline: 27" Structure: Neenah R-3075-L, 48" (or larger) Structure: Neenah R-3067-L b) Isolated (in paved area): Neenah R-2553 c) Isolated (in vegetated area): Neenah R-2560-EA w/ type "C" grate 3) Manholes shall be provided with the following castings: a) Sanitary: Neenah R-1733 w/ concealed pick hole b) Storm: Neenah R-1733 lettered "STORM", center pick hole INSTALLATION 1) Unless otherwise noted, installation of all water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtenances shall be as per the CEAM Standard Specifications. TESTING REQUIREMENTS 1) Water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtances shall be inspected and tested as per Sections 261 1.3E-2611.3H and 2621,3F-2621.3H of the CEAM Standard Specifications. 2) In the event of discrepancies between the testing requirements of the MN Plumbing Code and the CEAM Standard Specifications, the most stringent will govern. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTES STANDARDS 1) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, most recent edition. GRANULAR BASE COURSE 1) Compacted thickness of finished base course: 6" 2) Process material for aggregate base shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3138, Class 5.. 3) The subgrade shall be tested and observed to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to placement of aggregate base material. Install base material as required to accommodate new plan grades. 4) Wet base material to approximate optimum moisture content either prior to delivery to job site or as soon as practical after being placed on subgrade. 5) Place in layers not exceeding 4" thickness (loose). 6) Compact with pneumatic or vibrating steel drum rollers. 7) After base course has been graded and compacted, thoroughly wet and slush roll with roller until all aggregates are thoroughly embedded. 8) Allow base course to cure for a minimum of 72 hours prior to bituminous course application. BITUMINOUS BASE AND SURFACE COURSE 1) Mix Designation Numbers for the bituminous mixtures on this project are per MNDOT Spec. 2360 2) Pavement smoothness requirements will be waived for this project. 3) Density for the bituminous mixture on this project will be the ordinary compaction method (MNDOT 2360.6C). 4) Light Duty: Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEA340B and shall be 4 inches thick after compaction. 4) Heavy Duty: Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 2 inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEA340B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. 5) Place no asphaltic mixture when the atmospheric temperature is below 45 degrees and falling, nor should pavement be placed under wet conditions. 6) Mixing a) Paving mixture: Uniform mixture of course aggregate, fine aggregate, mineral filler and asphaltic material. b) Grading and mixing: Conform to applicable sections of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, Section 2360. CONSTRUCTION METHODS 1) Properly clean base course and deliver hot mix asphaltic concrete in clean tight vehicles with covers if necessary. 2) Lay to a smooth surface without segregation of material and attain compaction as early as possible. Commence rolling while the material is hot, (minimum spread temperature 250 degrees F.) as soon as it will support the roller without undue displacement or hairline cracking and continue until a minimum of 96% of maximum has been attained, no further compression can be attained and all roller marks are eliminated. 3) The completed surface: Smooth, free of pockets that will retain water and shall not vary more than 1 /16" per foot nor more than 1 /4" under a 16' straight edge. Entire surface must drain. No flat areas are permitted. 4) Perform all Work in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. PAINTED LINES 1) Special marking paint compound especially for striping bituminous paving in one coat. 2) Manufacturers: Pratt & Lambert, Inc.; Sherwin Williams Co. or DuPont Co. 3) Colors: Use white paint for concrete and asphalt. 4) All surfaces to be painted must be thoroughly clean and dry. 5) Lay out painted lines with chalk on pavement in accordance with Project Drawings. 6) Accurately apply paint to the chalk marks, using striping machines, 4" wide stripes. 7) Apply paint in strict accordance with the manufacturer's directions. 8) Protect all paint from damage by traffic until dry. 9) Apply handicap logo at handicap stall. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL 1) Aggregate Base Testing: a) The granular base course shall be test rolled and observed by the Contractor's independent soils technician as per MNDOT 221 1.3C2 (Quality Compaction Method). Once the base course has been tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer, pavement may be placed. b) One mechanical analysis (ASTM D-422) per 500 cubic yards of base or fraction thereof. 2) Bituminous Testing: a) Test temperature of first truck. b) Ordinary compaction (MNDOT 2360.6C) CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS 1) ACI 318, ACI 315, CRSI, ACI 301, latest adoptions. 2) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction, most recent edition GRANULAR BASE COURSE MATERIAL 1) Compacted thickness of finished base: 6' - Concrete Pavement/Aprons 4" - Concrete Sidewalk 2) Base material shall consist of MNDOT 3149.2B2 Select Granular Borrow. AGGREGATES 1) Coarse: MnDOT Spec. 3137. 2) Fine: MnDOT Spec. 3126. WATER 1) Clean, fresh and potable, MnDOT Spec. 3906. AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES 1) ASTM C260. 2) Provide entrainment of 4 - 7 percent by volume. PORTLAND CEMENT 1) ASTM C150, Type I plus an approved air entraining agent, or Type IA air -entraining Portland cement. OTHER ADMIXTURES 1) MnDOT Spec. 3113. 2) Calcium Chloride or materials containing chlorides or nitrates shall not be allowed. PROPORTIONING AND DESIGN OF MIXES 1) Concrete Classifications a) Curb and gutter, slip -formed concrete: MNDOT Spec. 2461, Mix Design 31F32 b) Sidewalk, aprons, incidental concrete, manual curb & gutter: MNDOT Spec. 2461, Mix Design 31F52 c) Concrete pavements: MNDOT Spec. 2301, Mix Design 3A41 d) Repair concrete, fast strength concrete: MNDOT Spec. 2301, Mix Design 3A41 HE 2) Concrete Specifications: a) 3F32: J - 3" slump, 4500 psi, 5-8% air b) 3F52: 2 - 5" slump, 4500 psi, 5-8% air c) 3A41: 2 - 5" slump, 4500 psi, 5-8% air d) Temperatures of all concrete during placement shall be 50-deg F to 90-deg F CONCRETE PLACEMENT 1) Place concrete as soon as possible after mixing. Place before initial set has occurred, and in no event after it has contained its water content for more than one hour. 2) Avoid overworking concrete or allowing concrete to fall unrestricted for excessive vertical distances, and other situations which can cause segregation of the aggregates. 3) Concrete pavements shall be placed in accordance with applicable portions of MnDOT 2301. 4) Sidewalks shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2521. 5) Curb and gutter shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2531. PROTECTION 1) Provide adequate protection against rain, sleet and snow before and during placement and finishing of concrete. 2) Protect concrete from premature drying. Provide temporary covering as required. Keep concrete continuously moist for 7 days. 3) Treat concrete with membrane curing compound in accordance with MnDOT 2531.3G. COLD WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is below 40 degrees F., or when the concrete is likely to be subjected to freezing temperatures within 24 hours after it has been deposited unless adequate temporary heating is provided. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from freezing for the following 5 days. 3) No frozen materials may be used in the concrete. Chemicals may not be used to prevent freezing unless approved by the Engineer. 4) Perform all cold weather concreting in accord with ACI 306. HOT WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is above 100 degrees F. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from temperatures over 90 degrees for the following 5 days. 3) Thoroughly wet dry porous surfaces before concreting. 4) Water reducing admixtures with retarding properties are required for all concrete placed when the temperature exceeds 80 degrees F. 5) Perform all hot weather concreting in accord with ACI 305. FINISHING 1) Provide a broomed finish on exterior sidewalks and ramps unless noted otherwise. QUALITY CONTROL 1) The Contractor shall hire an independent testing firm to provide the following tests: a) The independent testing technician shall perform random field testing of the fresh concrete including slump, air content, and temperature. (ASTM C143, C173, C231 and C138). One series of the aforementioned tests shall be performed on the first load of concrete. b) The independent testing technician shall cast a set of four compression test cylinders for the first load of concrete as well as 1 set for every 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof, of concrete thereafter. Compression tests shall be performed on one test cylinder at 7 days and two test cylinders at 28 days. The fourth test cylinder shall be retained in the event of failing compression tests on the 28-day test cylinders. Note: The Contractor shall comply with the City of Monticello General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction. Coordinate with the City, as necessary. Reviewed by WSB June 24, 2024 N O 0/ CV C0 O C9 O i W W J Q 5 SCHULTZ ENGINEERING W & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 U FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z O U IZ O IL O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 J 1 xx/xx/2024 W d 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX C1 - STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN STANDARD NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS ai U N c N O N MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS BARREL TO CONFORM TO ASTM C-478 LATEST REVISION STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" - MAX 12" 27• DIA WITH EXTERNAL OR 0 INTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL 8" I 48' DIA USE NEENAH R-1642—A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755—G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS APPLICABLE. tiP"FtiAH R-1642 WITH B SOLID LID NE BEARING OR CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) EAT OPPOSITE SI EXCEPT FOR LETTERI 25 3/4 7 BEARIN SURFACE TO BE MACHINED 1600/11:4 24" 28 1/2 36" FRAME TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE HE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED T A M IN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) ,.- A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. I 1'- 0" I OR 5' IN BACK OF CURB IF CONCRETE WALK OR BITUMINOUS PATH ARE HYDRAFINDER PRESENT WATEROUFLAG HYDRANT MODEL 67 HYDRANT YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG Z TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. AFTER BACK -FILL CL EXISTING OR FUTURE STREET BREAKOFF FLANGE CURB OR GUTTER LINE w 1" TO 2" MAXIMUM o ABOVE BURY LINE (FINISHED GRADE) FINISHED GRADE a VALVE BOX AS WATERMAIN SPECIFIED �1 " TO 2" � I z of 0 En 2 LAYERS OF o w 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 10' POLY (4 mil) c� X TYPICAL zW 3' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PIT" z UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH `� 1/4 STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR A MINIMUM OF 1 C.Y. OF 1 1-1/2" CLEAR STONE I = WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. o OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG MEGALUG GATE VALVE TEE THRUST MEGALUG BLOCKING BLOCKING BEHND BELOW GATE THRUST HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15"x 15"x 4") VALVE BEHIND TEE Title: Title: Title: Title: Typical Hydrant Cone Section, Casting Steps, Standard Frame Typical Trench Compaction Standard Plate Libraryyp y Standard Plate Library and Adjusting Rings Standard Plate Library and Cover Standard Plate Library and Class B Bedding Installation City of Monticello Date: City of Monticello Date. Plate No. City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. y 03-05 Plate No. 03-05 2001 Revised: 10 01 Revised: 1002 Revised: 1007 Revised: 03 —17 � 03-15 03-15 03-15 MEGALI TEE AND BEND BEND WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL. POLY PLUG PLUG NOTES: 1 THRUSTBLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1 /2' AND OVER.I PIPE SIZE BEARING AREA 1 6" 4.0 SO FT 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE I 8" 6.0 SO FT I WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 PSI. 1 10" - 12" 12.0 SO FT I 3. THRUST BLOCKS BEARING AREA TO BE POURED 1 16" 20.0 SO ET AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE USED FOR 12" OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 Fr. OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS Standard Plate Library Cit of Monticello Y GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE ANC MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMEN' ALL MANHOLES WITH INSIDE DROP SECTION SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CLASS II CIRCULAR REINF LATEST REVISION USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS STEPS AT 16" OC � 6" "CRE-SEAL","RESEAL", OR APPROVED EQUAL o 8" PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE \ VARIABLE �1 MAX. 24" Q2 4 PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION •' WITH INVERT #5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY ^"""'^ SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) DR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" - MAX 12" 0 STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE 6" MIN NOTES: (1) MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. (2y IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24" INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. Title: Title: Blocking for Standard Sanitary Watermain City Standard Plate Library Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. of Monticello Date: Plate No. 2002 03-05 3001 Revised:03-17 Revised:03-15 STREET BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT - INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND LINE l I TRACER WIRE SPLICE l - lu CURB BOX STANDPIPE I i COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE I 2' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY l POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKETI POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT / CONTRACT I — 1" COPPER WATERMAIN COPPER STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT SANITARY SERVICE MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Tracer Wire (New Developments) Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised:03-15 3005 USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 BELOW FINISHED GRADE I VARIES 10' TO 20' --TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS r FINISHED GRADE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND — CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG r I� 4 PVC . HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 3006 It N O N C0 O (.0 O \ I W U) J Q SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 () FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Ir LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS F-- OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z 0 0 J. SCHULTZ, PE OBRIAN Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 OTC REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 J 1 xx/xx/2024 W Iz D_ 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 -STANDARD DETAILS C3 -STANDARD DETAILS C4 -STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN STANDARD DETAILS v 41 Q) N 2 O N NEENAH R-2553 (ISOLATED IN PAVED AREA) NEENAH R-3075-L (IN C&G) NEENAH R-2560-EA "BEEHIVE" (ISOLATED IN GREEN AREA) TYPE "C" GRATE 2" HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS 5 RINGS MAXIMUM (INSTALL ADJ. RINGS PER f MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS) . ...a � 2'-3" PRECAST CONCRETE BARREL / WATERSTOP GASKET, OR APPROVED X 5" �� ::'-� EQUIVALENT W/ NON -SHRINK PATCHING Q COMPOUND, AT PIPE/STRUCTURE 9 C? GROUT INVERT TO CONNECTION PROVIDE POSITIVE ° DRAINAGE TO PIPE CATCH BASIN SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 4006 \\.—SEE PLAN FOR PIPE DIAMETER 34 -�8" PRECAST CONCRETE BASE CATCH BASIN (MNDOT DESIGN "H") EXPANSION FADJACENT JOINT SURFACE CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A41 HE �� EXPANSION -- JOINT ADJACENT [d. SURFACE dam° 1 I- ������ IV I NOTES: 1. STEP RISER HEIGHT = 7" STEP TREAD WIDTH = 11 2. SEE PLAN FOR NUMBER OF STEPS 3. CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 2521.3C2 5 CONCRETE STEPS SECTION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER EXPANSION JOINTS NTS REINFORCEMENT: #4 BARS AT 8" O.C., EACH WAY 4" MNDOT 3149.2132 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE NTS EXPANSION JOINTS d F-AB B 6 Al d d ° 5' ° d d O CONCRETE TO BE EXPANSION POURED INTEGRALLY EXPANSION A WITH CURB JOINTS JOINTS PLAN B618 CONCRETE / CURB AND GUTTER VARIABLE 1 /4 PER /MIN FT. al MIN. 7 F?� �— 3/4 1" WIDTH VARIES 5' MIN. 8, SECTION B-B SECTION A -A Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Commercial Driveway Entrance Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 5008 CASTINGS MANHOLES: NEENAH R-1733-1 (LETTERED "STORM") W/ CONCEALED PICKHOLE CATCH BASINS: NEENAH R-3067-L (IN C&G) NEENAH R-2553 (ISOLATED) NEENAH R-2560-EA (ISOLATED BEEHIVE) - TYPE C GRATES CASTING (SEE ABOVE) RIM ELEV SEE PLAN 6j 2" HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS L� 5 RINGS MAXIMUM (INSTALL ADJ. RINGS PER .� MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS) C PRECAST CONCRETE COVER f c PRECAST CONCRETE BARREL(S) PLASTIC WITH RUBBER GASKET(S) ASTM C443-79 '. STEPS SEE PLAN FOR INTERIOR DIAMETER (ID) WATERSTOP GASKET, OR APPROVED ' EQUIVALENT W/ NON -SHRINK PATCHING COMPOUND, AT PIPE/STRUCTURE Z CONNECTION C e SEE PLAN FOR PIPE DIAMETER r .... s..}.. GROUT INVERT TO PRECAST CONCRETE BASE PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO OUTLET NOTES 1. SEE PLAN FOR INTERIOR DIAMETERS (ID) OF PRECAST CONCRETE BARREL SECTIONS 2. SEE PLAN FOR PIPE CUT-OUT SECTIONS 3. CONSTRUCT GROUTED FLOW LINES WITHIN STRUCTURE TO DIRECT FLOW TO OUTLET WITH NON -SHRINK GROUT 4. FILL ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN PIPE AND BARREL WITH NON -SHRINK GROUT. 3. PRECAST CONCRETE COVERS, BARREL SECTIONS, AND BASES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATES 4011 AND 4020 4. PLASTIC STEPS SHALL BE AS PER MNDOT STANDARD PLATE 4180 AND SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE OUTLET PIPE STORM MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN 2 NTS CONTRACTION JOINTS :�• .� a ,.o � ••.,•::, ,'.::� L 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 — 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVERAGE 8') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH — 6' DEPTH — 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH — 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS — 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS — 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Typical Sidewalk (PUBLIC) Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —17 5 012 1�' BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPWEA340B) TACK COAT BETWEEN BITUMINOUS COURSES 12" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB330B) 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE 3 LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NTS NOTE: CROSS -DRAIN NEENAH R-4990-C CONCRETE TO BE PLACED TRENCH FRAME WITH OP WITH ONE CONCRETE POUR TYPE "C" LID 7101 1 /2" EXPANSION 4,: d d° a �VO`, P 1 1 /2" FROM FRONT JOINT (BOTH SIDES) ° �01 a G /� FACE OF THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK ° m 4 d FACE OF SIDEWALK Pod P . o d . 4 ° G ° °.bd PLAN VIEW 6 SIDEWALK CROSS —DRAIN NOTES 4' PER FT SLOPE 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO DRAIN FROM THE CURB CONCRETE 6„ 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3F32 3. MNDOT B612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE a - REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 1 10 M i :a .. A. J 2" MIN. COMPACTED MNDOT =1 I I=1 11=III=III=1 11=III=III CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE �—III—III-1 I I— III=11 �_� III III BELOW CURB AND GUTTER -III-III -I APPROVED COMPACTED - 20" _ SUBGRADE OCURB &GUTTER (MNDOT 6612) NTS REINFORCEMENT: #4 BARS AT 24" O.C., EACH WAY 6" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A41) .. • 1. 6" MNDOT 3149.2B2 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW -III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III I 1I- II I -III -III -III -I I I„ I I I; ,I I I -I I -II APPROVED COMPACTED =1 11=1 11=III, 1 11- ' III =1 11=1 11=1 I I- SUBGRADE I I I I I I I I I �� I I I- -I 11=1 11=1 I NOTE: PLACE CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT AT THE MIDDLE OF THE PAVEMENT THICKNESS 9 CONCRETE APRON SECTION / NTS 1�' BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPWEA340B) TACK COAT BETWEEN BITUMINOUS COURSES 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB330B) 6' MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4 HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NTS NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TYPICAL AND APPLY TO BOTH SIDES OF THE CROSS-SECTION 12" _ 4. d'd° d ° a +d d. ° d d. O`Q .1 ° A G°. d CONCRETE d f a ° SIDEWALK °�?i ': 10" �...I —•= I .d:.d .. ° 3F— � 1/2" EXPANSION 3" �F,. 4. d d °° m f ;:°°6' I . ° JOINT (BOTH SIDES) g d 1° ;��' d. A. [ 4 4] A' 10d ° ° A. .I ., d d. I°d REINFORCEMENT: P I l d ° °„' ° I U-SHAPED #4 BARS 1'� °° ° ° .� I AT 12" O.C. A° f 22" - PROFILE VIEW NTS I _ 2'-0" 1 -0 hj CONCRETE SEE PLANS FOR ♦.. 8, GUTTER SLOPE -I I— 71M 2" MIN COMPACTED I -II -I I CLASS 5 BELOW - VALLEY GUTTER APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE OVALLEY GUTTER CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB #4 BARS 4" (TYP) 4" (TYP) a 1} �d d a d n O d d JOINT CONCRETE APRON NOTES: 1. REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES WHERE CONCRETE APRONS ABUT CONCRETE FLOOR SLABS 2. BAR SPACING: 12" O.C. FOR 8" CONCRETE APRONS 18" O.C. FOR 6" CONCRETE APRONS 3. BARS SHALL BE PLACED AT THE CENTER OF THE THINNEST APRON OR SLAB, BUT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM BAR COVER OF 3" 4. BARS SHALL BE PLACED ACROSS TOTAL WIDTH OF BUILDING ENTRANCE NTS 10 APRON/FLOOR SLAB JOINT REINFORCEMENT NTS W W U) J 5 SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN 0 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 5;PH: (320) 339-0669 (� FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 T_ 0 OBRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 QREVISIONS Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 -STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 -STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN STANDARD DETAILS 0 4-1 3 N O N 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3F52) ....y + 4" MNDOT 3149.2132 SELECT ° GRANULAR BORROW APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 2521.3C2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK/PATIO SECTION (PRIVATE) 0 NTS TRUNCATED DOMES AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A 'j4 FLARED CONCRETE (TYP) 4 6" CURB FACE OQ� a b PAVEMENT J 6" CURB FACE 5 PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMPS W/ LANDING IN SIDEWALK NTS SLOPE TOWARDS ADJACENT STREET 2.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SP 9.5 SPWEB230B) 10-FT WIDE, AT 2.0% SLOPED TOWARDS PINECONE ROAD — 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE — APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS TRAIL SECTION 2 N NTS BACK OF CURB (TYP) FLARED CONCETE (TYP) P�� S �• °oo 00 FLUSH W/ PAVEMENT ° ° b 6" CURB TRUNCATED DOMES FACE (TYP) AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A PAVEMENT I` 12" GUTTER— (TYP) CURB FACE (TYP) (MAY BE OMITTED IF ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPING) o ° 00000 CURB FACE �o 000 (TYP) b CONCRETE RAMP W/--l' MAX. SLOPE OF 12:1 TRUNCATED DOMES ep AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A CONCRETE LANDING (FLUSH W/ ADJACENT PAVEMENT) PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMP ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK 3 K NTS TRUNCATED DOMES AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A 0 a a a a \' 0 4 a 6a b 6' CURB ° FACE a K a PAVEMENT FLUSH W/ PAVEMENT TRUNCATED DOMES AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A 6" CURB ° FACE Oe� a b PAVEMENT 6" CURB FACE OPEDESTRIAN ADA RAMPS W/ LANDING BACK OF CURB (TYP) CURB TAPE><< �\ (TYP) SO �N� a `0 ° 0 o� 4 2 b FLUSH W/ PAVEMENT 6' CURB TRUNCATED DOMES FACE (TYP) AS PER MINDOT STD. PLATE 7038A038A I, SIDEWALK PAVEMENT 12" GUTTER— (TYP) NTS PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMP W/ FLARED CURB 7 PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMP W/ LANDING R PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMP ALONG RADIUS CURB 6 NTS NTS NTS It N O N Cf) O O O w W U) J SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 () FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY rr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z O U IIr O ILL. O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 QREVISIONS Z` NO. DATE DESCRIPTION G J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 -STANDARD DETAILS C3 -STANDARD DETAILS C4 -STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN STANDARD DETAILS cn Note, 3-4' raising adjustments shown Include removal/relocation information on a would require an additional structure I separate Existing Conditions/Removals plan sheet 1 section or replacing the structure itself Provide ped ramps / meeting ADA requirements - - Provide emergency overflow elevations (EOFs ) for NOTE: REMOVE EXISTING BITUMI OUS all low points In the parking lots and green spaces PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK AND CU B & GUTTER AS -Note EOFs for green space catch basins do not Note retaining walls greater than 4' in NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL NECESSARY FOR NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. appear to meet minimum freeboard requirements height shall be designed by a Minnesota OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY with the lowest opening of the building (964.85) Registered Structural Engineer PERMITS FOR WORK WITHIN REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK J THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. AND CURB & GUTTER AS NECESSARY PER CITY - 1 REQUIREMENTS (SEE C10). q Provide existing/proposed casting types -ADJUST E STING MANHOLE -DEMOLITION O ° e ° ° e o° ° e :, • ° ° o NEW RIM = 963.00 LIMITS (TYP) �.. - - • e o e°.. :°°. .° ° e° e° °°• • ° ° °>> RETAINING WALL#1 �,5 > v HEIGHT = 0 TO 1.8-FT� V » c -2-FT CONCRETE VALLEY �NGTH = 86-FT 3 r' RETAINING LL 12 < ` / GUTTER @ 0.46% TYP < s _ - - - HEIGHT = 0 TO 4-FT LENGTH = 301-FT --< < < 59.10 EX EX 59.31 > - < DEMOLITION E \ - n --r > ' LIMITS TYP ( ) // I �M b "T ' ' n 2-FTC NCRETE VALLEY ( ) DEMOLITION / -7F M FM i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 n ADJUST EXIS G MANHOLE ��` 59. 60.20 uMIIJ TYP � / 65 EX GU R @ 0.46% (TYP) I 6 NEW RIM = 962.41 N FFM M B3 148" Ir>,1- / L EX b, 9' c_131 (48" ID) EX EX 2 5 F -.. RIw1 - 044 7 � _ HDPE V _ _ bZ• 0 6' X - FM EX FM INV�i- 5439 / INV = 959.9 - 39h f:R U4 / 59.81 1 964 EX 960 - ,a ,-� I �= - �S . u�- + --- ------ --- - �4 -- -- 6320 62' 63 00 962 - - - - (27 Ili) ----- - o ° a' RIM::962.10 j I " 55 62.75 � INV = 959. i6 I ' � I 1.3% 63. � Cy 1.4% o 6-, 63. H P 1 l% cr I IkiF_r _ 1 I - • � 2 1.370 1.0% 6320 5 63.70 1- k 6 HP 62.95 64.10 g0 149 LF CB8 (48" ID 6�2 63 50 a, I_I_ �* - I I I � w 6 74 0° 62.80 6 •g0 00 03• �j0 c� _ ° r- - - -� 964 12" HDPE RIM = 9� 90 I, 1 1 6 3 �" I 62.7 I I I 1 30 L ,�' 02 3 1 �, I rod 6� 4 i 40 64 10 @ 0.89% INV = 958.64 63.40� 9 qbo 9 -=- - g � 6 � 9 3.70 = n a�� - - - - - - - - - - � 63.85 ��* 121=1e2y\ 0 963.31 I I l �0 °i 64.1 9 ,/ o 63.40 N 88 ° 4T 24" E 1 9 f 63.70 r\ �� 64.50 I I /`L N o� - I 1 64.40 64.30 64.10 rn v, 959.38 1 962 << °L' 1,- `� o 0 0 /� I I 90 cr U, ST � I I 64.60 64.30 64.60 I ���\� 1 l I I �3.9 63.50 / o CB4 (27" ID)�I� � 6 I n I 096 - 20 95 � - F 964 � � a 64.70 I /��• - I 2'80 p 9fi - 64 I �V _ .' 1 a2 1 64.70 1 }� ba)° RIM = 962.00 I I 63.0 - - - I j I �� LF \ INV = 959.25 ° 63.70 _ I _ I I j q64 LF 63.30 12„ HDPE I i 63.85 ,� , - CB2 (48" ID) 64. 6 64.10 I - 6470 63.70 cn 0 8" PVC @ 0.89% -o - �� ❑O - 0 RIM = 962.15 °64.74 \� 76 LF 1 C I bq 15 64.81 w INV = 959.54 1} 64.20 I I - - 64.81 /7 @ 1.00� I n 64•81 �� o o I N RO -_� I I - �- 6� 81 64.81 - - - -, - - - ° �b� ' o CB9 (48" ID) 12" HDPE I 1 212 LF -10 ❑ - - - 964 SIDEWALK CROSS -DRAIN 64.00 @ 0.66% ° V- oo - �- 64 64.81 F 963.25 9 I RIM = 963.0 964 1 1 1% 15" HDPE 1 co ao 81 HP11 64.81 81 35 64.35 64.35 FLOWLINE W = 963.35 rn 1.0% I � @ 0.30% 64'8 64.81 47 d: I I 82 LF p W INV 9 I 64.15 64.81 ,� 64.81 64 �o< co .� 64.35 35 1 64.35 6" SCH 40 PVC 64 R 3. 0 �9 I o I .35 �STMH1 (48" ID) I 64.35 0 0 64• I 4.35 1 1 �� W 6+` cps 64•$1 i 64.81 i 1 1 35 @ 1.07% CONNECT TO INTERNAL 64. 1 64,4o I 1 1 l RIM = 963.35 ° W � I sro� INV - 9 75 f I CB7A (27" ID) ROOF DRAINS 4 LF 1 SIDEWALK CROSS -DRAIN- / \ PROPOSED BUILDING CONNECT TO INTERNAL- I RIM = 963.85 PROPOSED BUILDING 18" HDPE RCB5IM (48" ID) FLOWLINE N = 963.85 FFE = 964.85 INV @ BLDG = 958.34 64. 1 ' I 1 1 RIM - 962.80 ` � SIDEWAL SS -DRAIN ROOF DRAINS I I INV = 960.85 FFE = 964.85 63. HP 1 I oo @ 0.30% 1 INV = 958.63 FLOWLINE S = 963.75 FILQWL1NE N = 963.85 INV @ BLDG = 960.31 1 -� I n I 63.45 FLOWLINE S = 963.75 --5 LF I ,I� I ` ' 64.35 6Dc� �64.35 64.81 4 81 64. 1 �4 tjIDP = I 64.35 4 3 I �° I �� c`Fo co 6 64.35 64.35 @ 2.P0% 1 64.35 0 Qi 9b6� 64.35 ( 1 I 70 LF g 15 64.81 64 35I I a, I_/ 64.81 I I ° -0 I ' 1 y <� j jI Li VVVIII .A _ I 1 � WALK CR S-DRAIN 1-4 6Q I I 1 I @ 0.30%HDPE ,6'9 -� - - �� - 38 LF 64. 1 FLOWLINE E = 963.10 -� ~ 1 17 ° 0 _�� -- - _ 8" PVC 64.81 - 2" HDPE 6' 1 0 v 64.6 ,., r- @ 1.00 ° FLOWLIN-963.20 ` �( I I - / % I o 1 5 v I 63.35 / 63.55 • . / 0.89% o I 63.5 / o• ° ` rn ` _ o / �; v I 64.20 I qb+ 8 • ° ° °° co / co car �? ° 64 10 `a CB11 27" ID d 1 3 15 I 63.75 5 I 6`3• °° 82 LF CB13 (48" ID) 6 � /� � � 90 LF � ( ) �p rp HP HP 64• 64. J�9 12" HDPE RIM = 963.00 b� 63. 5 12" HDPE 1� RIM = 963.35 64.81 6� 00 a 64.00 30 ° 6 H P 63.50 `@ 1.00% X INV = 960.85 q Dc -74 LF @ 0.45% INV = 958.88 `- 3 / - 'J• I ADJUST EXIS G ANHOL� I 6 by -�a 63.7 5 RIM= 64.01 79 LF 964 w 12" HDPE IM= 965. NEW RIM 963.2 RIM= 964.24 - q � I INV 3.99 18' SCH 40 PVC STMH2 (48" ID) @ 0.45% 6 63'� I I �- 964 L� 6' V E W= I. 1 ° rn - Ll 3. 0 @ 0.30% 63. 0 RIM = 963.80 °INV E/Wi.o�i5 HP °% 1 1% 32 I f ` W RI 6 INV= 958.14 1 = c •b1 6 I f- HP INV=958.18 1. % o ,� 4 ai I 12 1.5% 63 5 I, r 4 0% I bV 1.2% o 0 N rn rj N y- ° 64.30 964 - - - - - - - I 63 65 - _ �" M -- ---- --- ° - - N �' 6 63.85 bp, HP 12" HDPE 1 1% 1.2% HP 646.5`7° 67.3 'f I I I = e `O R A - - / - - - o - - - - - - - - - - - - ' 64.55 �� q g0 63.50 63.80 90 - _(. - --, - - - -- - = 1-- - Z - .c; r O - _63' 964 R @0. ,� 10 964 -- 964 M _ - - _ ,, _ _ - 64. 64.35 - 1� - - - - - 64.30 _ � 7.05 964 1 4 - - �� �� STMH4j48"IDJ----- - ---- -- - --- �� qb 4.0%-I' HP B _ _ _ _ _ - RIM = 963.15 H3 (48" ID) 65.2_ - - - 65.15 64.35 _ 1 I T 10 LFJ // 17 LF� INV N, E, S = 959 RIM = 963.90 - - - - - - greys fit ressFasemen T- 4.26 q, i, wv vd = 958� " INV= 955.93 64.65 6 1 - 6" PVC 12" HDPE _ er Doc. No 4�85 �- I NOTE: FIELD VERIFY ISTING BC�CB14 (48" ID) @ 0.90% @ 1.17% SUMP = 954.75 4• HP CB10 (48' ID) 1 1 - CONNECT TO EXISTING PHAVEN RIM = 963.00 - 64.7 I I n I I ELEVATIONS APARTMENTS.IOSOPR EPOSED SPOT STORM SEWER STUB BC CB12 27" ID)- FL _ �� RIM = 963.00 F[INV - 958.18 INV = 958.51 RI - 962.90 65.18 INV = 957.02 Provide existing/proposed - - - - - - - - - - - - = v _ 64.90 L CONNECT TO EXISTING 4.25 FL 64.36 ELEVATIONS A BASE ON (FIELD VERIFY) > I �960.15 > > 4.55 BC EC STOR SEWER STUB NOTE: FIELD VERIFY EXISTING I casting types PREVIOUS PL S DATED 07-07-20. y UNDERGROUND STORMTECH - 1 < I < - - < - GT NOTE: EXISTING STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM N1= J04. �0 p INV = 55.93 ELEVATIONS OF DEEPHAVEN I DEMOLITION TRANSFORMER TO / _ co vi (FIE VERIFY) APARTMENTS. PROPOSED SP(PT IM= 3.97 I I I _ BE N CATED. - ; (2) ROWS OF 14 MC-4500 - RIM= 964. - - - - - - _ - INV= 955. 7 0 III��� ELEVATIONS ARE BASE ON 1 INV- 9 .26 LIMITS (TYP) RIM= 964.06 CHAMBERS W/ ISOLATOR ROW I 1 -1 (SEE 1/C5) INV= 959• 8 N E: CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVIOUS PLANS DATED 07-07-20. Note, 1' loweringadjustment INV= 958.00 MOLITION v J Provide existing storm sewer stub size, BTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION RI = 964.88 I may require replacing a structure material, material grade, slope, etc. 11 ITS (TY ROM ADJACENT PROPERTY 1 section or the structure itself ��� I /// I i I III ', i) OWNER FOR WORK COMPLETED INV= 961.73 1 Include removal/relocation information on a Identify areas of tipout curb ON ADJACENT PROPERTY � Call out to match existing (e.g. ME, etc.) Provide existing storm sewer stub size, separate Existing Conditions/Removals plan sheet elevations where applicable material, material grade, slope, etc. pP Provide to City prior BOTTOM OF BACKFILL/ TOP OF PAVEMENT KA U I N V NU I LY to the start of work TOP OF CRUSHED ROCK-- ELEVATION = 963.00 NOTE: PAVEMENT AND CLASS 5 STORMTECH SYSTEM NOTES • ELEVATION = 961.67 ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS INC L ING, BUT NOT LIMITED 10. SPOT ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS, BOTTOM OF CLASS 5/ DETAIL ARE THE ELEVATIONS AT TO, THE FOLLOWING: UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. TOP OF CHAMBER TOP OF BACKFILL THE LOWEST PAVEMENT 1. TRAFFIC FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED AS MUCH AS ELEVATION = 960.67 ELEVATION = 962.25 ELEVATION ABOVE THE SYSTEM. POSSIBLE ACROSS AREA DESIGNATED FOR STORMTECH SYSTEM, AND BE ONLY LOCATIONS, DEPTHS, SIZES, AND MATERIAL TYPES OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, D SPOT ELEVATIONS LOCATED ALONG CURB & GUTTER OR THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK REPRESENT LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT. DESIGNATED AREA SHALL BE EXCAVATED SURFACE ELEVATIONS WILL VARY STORM SEWER UTILITIES, INCLUDING EXISTING STUBS FLOWLINE ELEVATIONS OF GUTTER SECTION OR ADJACENT PAVEMENT. TOP -OF -CURB OR WITH A BACKHOE STATIONED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. ABOVE THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. TOP -OF -THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK SURFACE ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT * RIM AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING SANITARY AND STORM SEWER UTILITIES, ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. THE BOTTOM OF THE STORMTECH EXCAVATION SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A INCLUDING EXISTING STUBS MINIMUM DEPTH OF 24 INCHES WITH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING NON -SEWER AND NON WATER UTILITIES (IE: GAS, SPOT ELEVATION DESIGNATIONS: (TILLER, RIPPER, ETC.) PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE CRUSHED ROCK BASE O O REGARDING THE STORMTECH ELECTRIC, COMMUNICATIONS, ETC.) SYSTEM, CONTACT THE "EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION FOLLOWING: EXISTING ABOVE -GROUND INFRASTRUCTURE AND SITE FEATURES "HP" DENOTES HIGH POINT 3. ONCE THE EXCAVATION AND SCARIFICATION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR( * "FL" DENOTES FLOWLINE SHALL ARRANGE AND PAY FOR TESTING THE INFILTRATION RATE OF THE BOTTOM OF ADS CONTACTS: 'BC" DENOTES BACK OF CURB THE EXCAVATION PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE CRUSHED ROCK BASE. THE TEST 2. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN ACTUAL 'EC" DENOTES EDGE OF CONCRETE RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER. INLET - ELEVATION = 957.59 TOM ROONEY SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO "EP" DENOTES EDGE OF PAVEMENT (VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER) (612) 756-3552 ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. 4. STORMTECH SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. OUTLET - ELEVATION = 958.65 MIKE ARENDS A ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE (VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER) (612) 597-1909 3. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY ADEQUATE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS CATCH BASINS, CURB CUTS, PONDS, BASINS AND/OR COMPLETED BY KLD SURVEYING, BRAINERD, MN. (218) 829-5333 OTHER OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT SPECIFIED SURFACE OTTOM OF STONE BOTTOM OF CHAMBER- INFRASTRUCTURE TO ELEVATIONS AND GRADES INDICATED ON THIS PLAN, AS WELL AS ENSURE ELEVATION = 954.92 ELEVATION = 955.67 4. BENCHMARK: CONTACT SURVEYOR. THAT ADEQUATE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IS CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SITE AND/OR CONSTRUCTION AREA. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1 166 FOR A UTILITY LOCATE 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTRACT WITH A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR DESIGN OF NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE RELEVANT ELEVATIONS OF THE STORMTECH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE MC-3500 UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM FOR THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEGINNING WORK. ANY RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. INSTALL THE UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM PER SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE INSTALLED IN STRICT b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o O I � I O I W U-J) G _ 5 SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 FM > PH: (320) 339-0669 FM U FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com T Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS ° U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS ®I 1-- OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA O ° U I O O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 I° REVISIONS Z ° NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 D Provid1 xx/xx/2024 e invert elevations for all pipes in the structures ° -Include pipe size and direction 2 xx/xx/2024 NOTE: REMOV EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVE, RENT AS ECE$SARY FOR NEW DRIVEWAY ENT ANCE - ° REPLACE BITUMI OUS PAVEMENT AS 3 xx/XX/2024 NECESSARY PER ITY REQUIREMENTS (SEE C10). NOTE: CONTRA OR W11,11.11. 4 xx/xx/2024 OBTAIN ALL NEC iSSAR PERMITS FOR W ItK WITHI THE PUBLIC RIGH-OF;,WAY. Provide to City prior to the start of work I EX Vol I I DEM LITION ° ° F LIMIT ITYP) SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 Provide additional existing grading information on adjacent property to demonstrate matching and drainage ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS © SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX C1 -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN GRADING PLAN SCALE: 1 "=30' 1 1 1 0 30 60 C 5 DOWNSTREAM PONDS SI M/s`S'/SS�AA woo /,'iVF PROPOSED SITE h E1In C', t,. VICINITY MAP PROJECT INFORMATION NTS Protect Description This project will consist of the construction of a new hotel & restaurant building with an approximate footprint of 27,000-SF. Some storm water management will be required for this project, which will consist of an underground storm water detention system. Disturbed Area & Impervious Surface Tabulation Proposed Construction Area (includes adjacent property) Only Subject Property Anticipated Disturbed Area 4.0 acres Anticipated Disturbed Area 3.6 acres Existing Impervious Area 0.00 acres Existing Impervious Area 0.0 acres Proposed Impervious Area 3.13 acres Proposed Impervious Area 3.00 acres Net Impervious Area Increase 3.13 acres Net Impervious Area Increase 3.00 acres Permanent Site Drainage Site drainage from the majority of the proposed development will be routed directly to an existing regional storm water facility located on the property to the south. Storm water will be conveyed via proposed and existing storm sewer. Based on information provided by the City of Monticello, the downstream storm water facility is designed and sized to provide water quality and rate control for impervious area from the proposed project equal to 75% of the total site area. The proposed project includes proposed impervious surfacing equal to 83% of the total site area. This equates to proposed impervious surfacing, in excess of the originally assumed 75%, of 8% of the total site area or 12,600-SF. It is proposed for site drainage from an area with greater than 12,600-SF of impervious area be directed to a proposed StormTech underground storm water detention system to provide water quality and rate control for the excess impervious area. The StormTech system has been designed to treat drainage from 1.1" of runoff off the excess impervious area as per City MS4 and MPCA NPDES permit requirements. For larger events, the StormTech system and associated outlet has been designed to limit discharges such that post developed site runoff rates do not exceed predeveloped site runoff rates from 2, 10, and 100-year, 24-hour storm events, from the contributing drainage area. Pre-treatment has been provided for the proposed StormTech system via a catch basin sumps. STORMTECH SYSTEM CALCULATIONS Draw Down Time Total contributing impervious surfacing = 18,600 sf Assumed underlying soils: Poorly graded sand with silt (SP-SM) (based on geotechnical report) Required water quality volume = 18,600 sf x 1.1-in = 1,710 cf Assumed groundwater elevation: Below 930 (based on geotechnical report) StormTech System Assumed infiltration rate: 1.60 in/hr Provided infiltration volume: (based on MN storm water manual) 3,430 cf (See Storm Water Calculation Report) Maximum time of infiltration = 48 hrs, 0 min Design time of infiltration = 48 in (4.0-ft) / 1.60 in/hr = 30 hrs, 00 min (assuming full system to outlet) Receiving Surface Waters The following surface waters could receive storm water runoff from this project, and are within 1 mile of the project site: Surface Water Type of Impaired Special USEPA Approved TMDL Comments Surface Water 2 Water. 2 2 Water. for Impaired Water. p IDownstream Ponds Pond No No Distance = 0.1 to 0.3 miles IMississippi River River No Yes Distance = 0.9 miles SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS This SWPPP has been designed mainly to provide erosion and sediment control of naturally occurring soils at this site (ie: sands, loams, and clays). Although this SWPPP does address pollution prevention of other man-made materials, it is assumed that these materials will consist of debris from existing structures and pavements to be demolished, or debris and chemicals fie: fuels, new paints, etc.) resulting from new construction. There are no known solid wastes or hazardous materials buried below grade at this site. If such wastes or hazard materials are discovered during construction, the SWPPP Coordinator (described below) will be responsible for notifying the Engineer. This SWPPP will then be revised to address he presence and disposal of these additional pollutants EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES SWPPP Design Engineer and Qualifications Design Engineer Brian J. Schultz, PE Training Course Design of SWPPP Recert. * "Design of SWPPP" is a recertification course offered by the University of Minnesota. The Engineer's certification Training Entity University of Minnesota for "Design of SWPPP" is current, and will expire May 31, Instructor John Chapman 2026. Certification documentation is on file at the Engineer's office and a copy can be provided upon Dates of Training Course Spring 2023 (Online Course) request. Total Training Hours 7.0 SWPPP Coordinator and Qualifications The Contractor shall provide an individual who shall serve as the SWPPP Coordinator for this project. The SWPPP coordinator shall oversee the implementation of this SWPPP, as well as the necessary inspections (described below) of erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs. The SWPPP Coordinator shall also oversee the installation, maintenance, and repair of the BMP's to be completed in accordance with this SWPPP. The SWPPP Coordinator shall be responsible for the items listed above during the period from the start of the project to the establishment of final stabilization. During this period, the SWPPP Coordinator, or their assigned, qualified (see below) representative shall be available for an on -site inspection within 72 hours upon request by the MPCA. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to complete the table below, which will identify the SWPPP Coordinator and that person's qualifications. This person shall acknowledge that he/she has been assigned to serve as SWPPP Coordinator and will be overseeing the items listed in this section, by providing their signature in the space below. Please note that this SWPPP will not be considered complete if the table below is not filled in. * Typically, the identity of the SWPPP Coordinator is unknown until the project is awarded. The SWPPP Coordinator may be identified at the project's Preconstruction Conference. SWPPP Coordinator Company Name Office Phone # Cell Phone # Training Course Training Entity Instructor Dates of Training Course Total Training Hours I, , hereby (Printed Name) acknowledge that I will be serving as SWPPP Coordinator for this project and will be responsible for overseeing the items identified in this section. (Date) (Signature) The SWPPP Coordinator may assign other personnel to supervise or perform the duties listed above. However, in completing the duties listed above, at least one person shall be trained in erosion prevention and sediment control as related to that particular part of the SWPPP. If the SWPPP Coordinator chooses to delegate some of the duties and responsibilities listed above to other personnel, a list of the personnel, as well as their qualifications, shall be kept with and shall become part of this SWPPP. The qualifications shall be documented in a manner similar to the table shown above. A copy of this list shall be provided to the Engineer. Once the project has been completed and accepted by the Owner, and Final Stabilization has been established and "Notice of Termination" submittedto the MPCA, the Owner assumes responsibility for the long term maintenance of the storm water management system. The SWPPP Coordinator shall be responsible for ensuring that the Contractor properly disposes of the temporary erosion and sediments control measures within 30 days after site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary measures are no longer needed. Record Retention The SWPPP and associated records shall be stored and maintained by an employee or representative of the Owner for 3 years after the submission of the Notice of Termination (NOT) Responsibility for overseeing the records will be transferred to another employee or representative should the current personnel become uninvolved with the project or Owner. These records shall include the following: 1). The final SWPPP 2). Any other stormwater related permits required for the project 3). Records of all inspection and maintenance conducted during construction 4). All permanent operation and maintenance agreements that have been implemented, including all right-of-way, contracts, covenants and other binding requirements regarding perpetual maintenance 5). All required calculations for design of the temporary and permanent Stormwater Management Systems BMP INSPECTIONS Inspection Frequency The SWPPP Coordinator shall inspect, or designate someone else who is qualified to inspect (see above), the construction site erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs per the following time frames: 1). Once every 7 days 2). Within 24 hours of a rain event (1 /2" or greater over 24 hours) Inspections shall be conducted per the time frames listed above with the following exceptions: 1). Where parts of the construction site have permanent cover, but work remains on other parts of the site, inspections of areas with permanent cover may be reduced to once per month 2). Where construction sites have permanent cover on all exposed soil areas and no construction activity is occurring anywhere on the site, the site must be inspected for a period of 12 months (inspections may be suspended during frozen ground conditions). Following the 12th month of permanent cover with no construction activity, inspections may be terminated until construction activity is once again initiated or sooner if notified in writing by the MPCA. 3). Where work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, the required inspections and maintenance schedule must begin within 24 hours after runoff occurs at the site or prior to resuming construction, whichever occurs first. Inspection Records The SWPPP Coordinator shall maintain inspection records during construction. These must be recorded in writing within 24 hours of the inspection and/or maintenance activity. The inspection records shall include the following: 1). Date and time of inspections 2). Name of person(s) conducting inspection 3). Findings of inspections, including recommendations for corrective actions 4). Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities) 5). Date and amount of any rainfall events greater than 1 /2" in 24 hours a). The Contractor shall install and maintain a rain gauge at the construction site in order to verify rainfall amounts. 6). If any discharge is observed to be occurring during the inspection, a record of all points of the property from which there is a discharge must be made, and the discharge shall be described (i.e., color, odor, floating, settled, or suspended solids, foam, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of pollutants) and photographed. 7). Documentation of any changes to the SWPPP made during construction a). If the SWPPP coordinator observes that a BMP fails on a regular basis and believes that it is ineffective, it shall be his/her responsibility to notify the Engineer of such deficiencies. The Engineer may then amend the SWPPP (see "Amending the SWPPP") Note: Copies of all inspection records shall be submitted to the Engineer. AMENDING THE SWPPP During the construction of this project it may become necessary to amend this SWPPP. Should the responsibility of installing, inspecting and maintaining the erosion and sediment control devices and techniques described in this SWPPP be transferred from the current Contractor to another Contractor, or from the current Contractor to the Owner, this SWPPP shall be updated accordingly. The Owner will also be required to complete an "Permit Modification Form". Should it be determined, during construction, by the SWPPP Coordinator, Engineer, or Regulatory Officials that deficiencies in this SWPPP exist, or if significant changes are made to the design/scope of this project that impact erosion prevention and sediment control, the Engineer shall be notified immediately. The Engineer will then review potential deficiencies and/or significant changes to project design/scope, and make necessary changes to the SWPPP. After changes are made to the SWPPP the Engineer will issue the necessary documentation reflecting the changes, to the g - g rY - g g - owner and to the SWPPP Coordinator. The SWPPP Coordinator shall be responsible to make sure that this documentation is added to the on -site SWPPP copy and that the changes described in the documentation is implemented on -site. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS Standards and References Materials and construction methods of all BMPs included in this SWPPP shall be as per the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction, latest edition. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and familiarize themselves with the specification sections applicable to this SWPPP, as there are several BMPs that specifically reference these sections. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall be expected to be familiar with the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with these specification sections. Undisturbed Areas If shown on the plan, the Contractor shall delineate areas that are not to be disturbed on the site. This may be done with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc., and shall be completed prior to the start of any grading operations. Regardless of the delineation method the Contractor chooses to use, the Contractor must communicate to his/her personnel and subcontractors that these areas are not to be disturbed and construction equipment (including trucks and personal vehicles) shall not be allowed in these areas. The Contractor shall minimize compaction and preserve topsoil as much as possible at the site. In pervious ("green") areas that are not essential to the construction of the project, the Contractor shall avoid construction traffic and maintain the existing condition of these areas. Temporary and Permanent Stabilization All exposed soil areas (including stockpiles) shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 7 days of construction activity temporarily or permanently ceasing in that portion of the site. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales, which drain off -site or to a surface water, and are within 200 lineal feet of the property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 24 hours of construction. Placement of temporary or permanent cover shall be initiated immediately upon suspension or completion of excavation operations. Temporary Cover: If the Contractor chooses to halt grading operations in a portion of the site (or the whole site) for a period exceeding 7 days, and grading operations (rough or finish grading) in the affected areas has not yet been completed, temporary cover shall be placed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary cover within 24 hours of connection. Depending on the Contractor's schedule, the temporary cover shall consist of one of the following BMPs: 1). Discanchored Mulch a). Discanchored mulch may be used in an area of the site for the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively short, but exceeds 7 days. b). The mulch shall be Type 3 per MNDOT Spec. 3882 c). An adequate quantity of mulch shall be evenly distributed to achieve 90% coverage of the exposed soils. d). Mulch shall be placed as per MNDOT 2575.3C. e). All mulch shall be disc anchored as per MNDOT 2575.3D. Prior to the placement and discanchoring of the mulch, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2574. f). Any areas that are exposed as a result of wind action after the initial mulch placement shall be covered with additional mulch to maintain 90% coverage. 2). Temporary Seeding with Mulch a). Temporary seeding with mulch may be used in areas of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively long. Although mulch still needs to be applied as described above, once the temporary seeding/turf is established, the mulch will no longer need to be maintained. The temporary seeding/turf will require very little maintenance. b). Prior to the sowing of temporary seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2574. c). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mixes 21-1 1 1, 21-1 12, or 21-1 13 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for temporary seeding. d). Temporary seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3B. e). Once temporary seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above. Permanent Cover: Upon completion of finish grading and/or placement of topsoil, initiation of the placement of permanent cover shall begin immediate) over all exposed areas. This includes areas designated for impervious surfacing fie: buildings, pavements/gravel ravel Y P g p g( g.p /g bases, sidewalks, etc.). Where the construction schedule will not allow for the placement of the permanent impervious surfacing within 7 days of the completion of finish grading, temporary cover shall be provided in these areas, as described above, until the permanent impervious surfacing can be constructed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water, shall be provided with permanent cover within 24 hours of connection. Areas designated for permanent turf establishment shall be provided with one or more of the following BMPs (see plan): 1). Permanent Seeding with Mulch a). Unless otherwise noted on the plans, all areas designated for turf establishment shall be provided with permanent seeding. b). In addition to the plan included as part of this SWPPP, the Contractor shall verify if a Landscaping Plan has been included in the plans by the Architect. If a Landscape Architect has specified higher quality permanent cover (ie: sod, hydroseeding, etc.), the Contractor shall provide this permanent cover in lieu of the permanent seeding specified in this SWPPP. c). Prior to the sowing of permanent seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2574. d). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mix 25-131 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for permanent seeding. e). Permanent seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.313. f). Once permanent seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above (under Temporary Cover), unless noted otherwise. 2). Erosion Control Blanket a). Erosion control blanket shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. These areas shall still be provided with permanent seeding, as described above, beneath the erosion control blanket. b). Erosion control blanket shall meet the requirements indicated in MNDOT Spec. 3885. See plan for category(s) of erosion control blanket. c). Erosion control blanket shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3G2. d). Erosion control blanket specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading (including permanent seeding). 3). Riprap a). Riprap shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). All riprap shall be underlain with Type 4 geotextile fabric. The fabric shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 251 1.3B2. c). Riprap materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3601, and shall be Class 3, unless noted otherwise on the plans. d). Riprap shall be considered "Random Riprap" and shall be placed as per MNDOT Spec. 251 1. e). Although it is permitted for the riprap to be placed with machinery, it will be necessary for the Contractor to hand place some of the riprap in order to provide a dense, well -keyed layer of stones with the least practical quantity of void space. f). The minimum thickness of the riprap shall be 18 inches, unless otherwise noted on the plans. g). Riprap designated at the end of pipe outlets shall be placed within 24 hours of installation of the pipe outlet end section. h). Riprap specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading. Sediment Control The following sediment control BMPs shall be implemented as part of this project: 1). Silt Fence a). Silt fence shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Silt fence shall be machine sliced and materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). Silt fence shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3132. d). Silt fence shall be installed prior to any upgradient grading operations, and shall remain in place and maintained adequately until upgradient areas achieve Final Stabilization (see below) e). Silt fence shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment on the upstream side of the fence reaches 1 /3 of the height of the fence. Repair or replacement of silt fence shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. f). Portions of silt fence may be removed to accommodate short-term activities, such as vehicle passage. Short-term activities shall be completed as quickly as possible, and new silt fence installed immediate) after completion of the short-term activity. p q Y P Y P Y If rainfall is imminent or forecasted in the near future, new silt shall be installed regardless of if the short term activity has been completed or not. The Contractor is advised to schedule short term activities during dry weather as much as practicable. No additional compensation will be paid due to additional silt fence associated with short-term activities. g). Temporary soil stockpiles shall be placed on the site in areas upgradient from silt fence. Where the Contractor chooses to place temporary soil stockpiles outside designated silt fenced areas, the stockpiles shall be surrounded by additional silt fence. Under no circumstances shall temporary soil stockpiles be placed over surface waters, curb and gutter, catch basins, culvert inlets or outlets, or ditches. 2). Catch Basin Protection a). WIMCO Road Drain protection devices, as manufactured by WIMCO, shall be used for catch basin protection on this project. WIMCO can be contacted at (952)-233-3055, and their web page is www.roaddrain.com. b). "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be installed at all catch basin locations immediately after placement of the catch basin structures. "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until permanent surfacing is constructed (ie: curb and gutter, pavements, and/or gravel surfacing). In areas designated for turf establishment, "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas is established. c). Upon construction of the permanent surfacing, the "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be replaced with the WIMCO product specified on the plans. The WIMCO devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). The contractor shall install and maintain the catch basin protection devices as per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. 3). Culvert Inlet Protection a). Culvert inlet protection shall be provided at all culvert inlet locations immediately after construction of the culvert. See plan included in this SWPPP for culvert inlet locations. b). Culvert inlet protection shall consist of the SedJacket, as manufactured by SedCatch Environmental Products. SedCatch Environmental Products can be contacted at (937)-435-5075, and their web page is https://sedcatch.com/collections/sedjacket. c). The culvert inlet protection shall remain in place and adequately maintained until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). Culvert inlet protection shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment reaches 1 /2 of the height of the SedJacket device fabric. Repair or replacement of culvert inlet protection shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. 4). Temporary Rock Construction Entrance a). Temporary rock construction entrances shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. See detail for temporary rock entrance design. b). If the Contractor chooses to access the site from locations other than where temporary rock entrances are specified on the plans, additional temporary rock entrances shall be placed at these locations, as well. c). Temporary rock entrance shall be constructed prior to the start of grading operations, and shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until Final Stabilization has been established. d). Temporary rock entrances shall be maintained in such a manner that the entrances prevent sediment tracking onto adjacent streets. If a temporary rock entrance is found to be ineffective, it shall be replaced or improved within 24 hours of discovery. e). The Contractor has the option to place Type 4 geotextile fabric beneath the temporary rock entrance. The fabric may extend the life of the entrance as it will reduce rock "sinking" into the underlying soils. If the Contractor chooses to use fabric, it should meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 251 1.3B2. f). If sediment tracking from the site is discovered on adjacent streets, the sediment shall be removed with a street sweeper or other approved method within 24 hours of discovery. This shall be done throughout construction of the project. This sediment may be returned and graded over exposed areas of the site, or disposed of off site per MPCA requirements. The City may order street sweeping to be performed at the Contractor's or Owner's expense if City staff find that construction activities are resulting in sediment or debris being tracked onto City streets. 5). Filter Logs a). Filter logs shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Filter logs shall consist of Type Wood Fiber biorolls and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3897. c). Filter logs shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3F. d). Filter logs shall be installed immediately after placement of erosion control blanket. e). Filter logs shall remain in place for the life of the project, and shall be allowed to degrade naturally. Dewaterinq If dewatering of sandy subsoils is required for this project, the pump discharge shall be treated prior to discharge off -site or into a surface water. Treatment of discharge shall be achieved with the use of a "Dandy Dewatering Bag" (or approved equivalent), as manufactured by Dandy Products,lnc. Dandy Products, Inc. can be contacted at (877) 307-0141, and their web page is www.dandyproducts.com. The "Dandy Dewatering Bag" shall be installed, utilized, and maintained per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. Once dewatering water has been treated, it may be discharged off -site or to a surface water. The discharge shall be visually checked to ensure that it is relatively clean and not visibly different from any receiving waters. If discharge is noticeably "dirty", the Engineer shall be contacted as additional treatment methods may be necessary. Adequate erosion control shall be provided at the point of discharge if it is located in an area with exposed soils or established turf. This erosion control may consist of temporarily placed rip rap, or other approved energy dissipation measures. The type of erosion control measure shall be at the Contractor's discretion, depending on the location of the dewatering discharge and the unique site characteristics. The erosion control measures shall be effective and shall be maintained adequately such that no erosion occurs at the point of discharge. ESTIMATED QUANTITIES ESTIMATED BMP QUANTITIES ITEM QUANTITY Temporary Seeding & Mulch 4.0 Acres Permanent Seeding & Mulch 0.87 Acres Silt Fence/Sediment Control Log 1,850 LF Temporary Rock Constr. Entrance 2 EA Catch Basin Protection 27 EA Category 20 ECB 520 SY * Note: Estimated quantities shown above indicate one application of the associated BMP. Additional quantity of BMP over what is indicated above may be required for maintenance of each BMP. Good housekeeping by the Contractor will likly result in less quantity required. Pollution Prevention Management Solid waste accumulated during construction, including collected sediment, construction materials, floating debris, construction debris, paper, plastics, and other solid wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA disposal requirements: 1). Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by a similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with storm water. 2). Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. 3). Hazardous materials, toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum -based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) shall be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access storage areas shall be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials shall be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. 4). Solid waste shall be stored, collected and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. 5). Portable toilets shall be positioned so that the are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over. Sanitary waste must be 1 p Y PP Y disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. The Contractor shall take steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. The Contractor shall conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. The Contractor shall ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled materials. The Contractor shall report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. § 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. If the Contractor washes the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing shall be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff from the washing area shall be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity shall be properly disposed of. The Contractor shall properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. No engine degreasing shall be allowed on site. The Contractor shall provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. The liquid and solid washout wastes shall not contact the ground, and the containment shall be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes shall be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. FINAL STABILIZATION Final Stabilization shall be considered established once the following requirements have been achieved: 1). All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. 2). The permanent storm water management system is constructed, and is operating as designed. Temporary or permanent sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins have been cleaned of any accumulated sediment. All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems and ditches are stabilized with permanent cover. 3). All temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs have been removed from the project site. BMPs designed to decompose on site may be left in place. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS The Contractor is solely responsible for the cleanup of any wetlands, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, other waters of the State (as defined by the MPCA's General Storm Water Permit), ground or roadway surfaces or other property damaged by construction activity related to this project. Besides the NPDES permit (MPCA General Storm Water Permit), the Contractor and/or Owner shall also be responsible to obtain all other necessary local government permits related to storm water management, and erosion and sediment control, if applicable (ie: Watershed District, City, MNDOT, etc.). This SWPPP is intended to provide a plan for addressing the erosion prevention and storm water management issues associated with this project. It is to be used in conjunction with the project plans, specifications, and the MPCA General Storm Water Permit. In addition to the SWPPP, the Owner, Contractor, and SWPPP Coordinator shall familiarize themselves with the actual requirements indicated in the MPCA General Storm Water Permit itself and are responsible for compliance with the permit's terms, requirements, and conditions. The Engineer can provide a copy of the permit upon request. N O01 N co O CO O 1 W W e , r 2 5 SCHULTZ ENGINEERING W & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 5; PH: (320) 339-0669 U FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Ir LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z O IZ O L.L O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE LICENSE NO.: 43129 Z DATE: xx/xx/2024 Ir REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 .J 1 xx/xx/2024 W Ir 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX C1 - STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES 0) 3 vi N 0 Z a_ a_ n N C6 N O N Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA-15 or CA-25 Riprop Bedding Geotextile fabric Original grade _ — O SECTION B-B (not to scale) Geotextile fG-. NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment trapping device Match Existing Grade J)LU I IUIN A —A (not to scale) Sediment Trapping Device _1-mil plates Original grade O � I Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates A A A A � o E Slope away from highway 24' min 50' min. or Right of Way PLAN Standard Plate Library City of Monticello � v N a O O /b rA I O O u 61 �. —a ~� Z a "I 1� 0 0 CM rn0 v ' Title: Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 03 -15 6002 EXISTING CURB PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG-23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. * FOR THE NEW R-3290—VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG-3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello STEEL FENCE POST (T—POST), BOTTOM OF MINIMUM 5' LONG, ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS DRAINAGE WAY 6' MAXIMUM SPACING. TH MINIMUM 3 ZIP TIES 50 LB. VNS19 PER POST TOP 8 OF F BRIC. a FABRIC7 LAMENT GEOTEXBLE o� ��L ,O FABRIC PER MNDE ICED) 3886-1 MACHINE SLICED). POST NOTCHE MACHINE SLICE TO FACE AWAY FROM FABRIC. 8"-12" DEPTH (PLUS 6" '' FLAP) ELEVATION POINTS A' SHOULD BE V HIGHER THAN POINTS "B" DIRECTION OF SURFACE �� �. A A 24" MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT :. B B NOTE: D COMPACTION: THE MACHINE SLICED METHOD (THIS DETAIL) IS THE AFTER "SLICING" IN THE FABRIC AND BEFORE INSTALLATION STANDARD SILT FENCE INSTALLATION METHOD. OF STEEL POSTS, DRIVE INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT OVER THE HEAVY—DUTY SILT FENCE INSTALLATION METHODS "SLICE" WHILE FABRIC IS LAYING ON THE GROUND. THEN SHOULD ONLY BE USED WHEN APPROVED OR DIRECTED INSTALL STEEL POSTS AND PULL UP FABRIC TO ATTACH AT BY THE CITY. A UNIFORM HEIGHT. MAINTAINANCE: 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL, AND ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED USEABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER MAY STILL BE NECESSARY, THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACE PROMPTLY. 3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT, THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. 4. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER IS NO LONGER REQUIRED, SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. -a i—A D o ;o 0 WINTER SUMMER � m D Placement of Sediment / Placement of Sediment o Filter Barrier 7' Behind Filter Barrier Along O Residential Curb or Behind Sidewalk Residential Curb I m O Driveway j Prior to Snow Plowing Driveway m v 1 Right of Way Entrance Right of Way Entrance / MD0 O 3 = 3 AZ ------------------ — ------------------- ------ —_------------- —-----Sidewadewalk lk o zpm — Concrete Concrete X DO m Curb & Gutter Curb & Gutter o§ a Street Street ? N O O O PLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SEDIMENT FILTER BARRIER OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT DEFLECTOR PLATE )P OF Y RB LY )INT I II VI I-1 LV YY 1 llUl\Ili Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 0 3 -15 6004 OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD 1 • • • • 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ® • II I a d 7 4 �r d A. d d d C�19q:7�SH4/b'l��l�I�69:I:A111� Standard Plate Library City of Monticello >� 10 lee0. II 3.3' L20 -4.6' r —0 q1 .1'.3' Y.3' 0.7 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 1.15 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 3.75 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 4:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES HIGH FLOW CHANNEL & SHORELINE �•�� �, Ii•Ii. � t ::i 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6' (15cm) DEEP X 6" (15cm) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12' (30cm) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12- (30om) PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM, STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2"-5" (5cm-12.5cm) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3" (7.5cm) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. NOTE: "IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6' (15m) MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 101 Title: Erosion Control Blanket Stapling Patterns & Installation Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised: 03 -15 6011 WING NUT ATTACHMENT HOOK SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 Title: Inlet Protection Grate Inlet Cover Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 0 3 -15 6005 It N O N co O O O W W J Q SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN 0 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 (� FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 0 SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Itr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 o OBRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 OTC REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS @ SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 -STANDARD DETAILS C3 -STANDARD DETAILS C4 -STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS D_ I N O C7 N NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR WORK WITHIN INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. (TYP) I ° : e ° ° ° e ° ° e ° ° ° °° o , ° ° ° ° °• ° °•° o ° INSTALL CATCH PERIMETER SILT v ° ° ° ° ° °° ° ° °° ° ° °�° ° ° BASIN PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) °°°° I (TYP)S v CATEGORY 20 TEMPORARY ROCK —CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL r PERIMETER SILT EROSION CONTROL CONSTRUCTION BLANKET \r INSTALL CATCH BA: FENCE (TYP) BLANKET ENTRANCE PROTECTION (TYP) INSTALL CATCH > INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION c rF > ' n > CATEGORY 20 BASIN PROTECTION r (TYP) EROSION CONTROL (TYP) �O `v a0 M BLANKET �v O I I v INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION (TYP) / n FM � FM F� L _� 59 M FM _ � _ I o �I It I i - --- — — — 4- _ - - _ - - .: _14 �11 _ _ _ -- 11 It VI Ol O c �� l �] 96 4! — r rtrxYaCxwk>C/y>l%?;lJ xx�a'>CJ�i.y` R^ _ — Il 1 .OnOn I J;! raina'ge tt tilit en 1962 CD 0 Lip c T !.A —IINV=951.25 )I rI -- — — — I( J -964 I6A INSTAI 4 IINSTALL COATCH 962 964 PROTE IN r I I —BASPTECTION �= 963.31 LEI] �N 88°47'24" 139.00 -19 959.38 %�INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION (TYP) / 64 I �096 96 - - Z96/ I v I INSTALL C�TCH a- 964 J BASIN PRd)TECTI ON I I - - (TYP) I I \ �. —7 I I I I PROPOSED BUILDING I I PROPOSED BUILDING / \ I FFE = 964.85 I I FFE = 964.85 PERIMETEr SILT I I FENCE (TY') I I — > 96601 —INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION �; I ° ° • ° ° ° • ° ° ° • °� Y I (TYP) v °_—� • ///°°° I I I INSTALL � CATEGORY 20 BASIN PROTECTION -e — , INSTALL CATCH EROSION CONTROL (TYP) T BASIN PROTECTION BLANKET _>PERIMETER S LT FENCE (TYP) E: CONTRA OR WkLL AIN ALL NECESSARY HITS FOR WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. I�177bt` i I RIM= 964.01 964 RIM= 965 9 (TYP) I/ I I�\\I TEMPORARY _ ROCK 'W= RI = 96 ENTRANCERIM= 964.24 IM= §I,9� INV= 953.CATEGORY 20 INV E/ = 951.69 964 IN E,CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL INV= 958.14 BLANKET 1 52. IN _ ) I = 949 2 11 ' �q / _ -----96-4IT) — — — G II 100 -------- _ � ° • ° F—� 964 O°Op O 964- --- --- — -- , a OiOO /V =—----------------— n - - Ilf� — — — — — — greys fit ressFasement I I I I _ er Doc. No 143369571 1 PERIMETER SILT PERIMETER SILT — — —�_--_ _------- -�----1 - FENCE TYP v INSTALL CATCH FENCE(TYP)I I BASIN PROTECTION Lr > > - CT (TYP) /� NOT A CONSTRUCTION RIM= 964. 10 PERIMETER SILT I I RIM= 3.97 I I i - �. - INSTALL CATCH 06 BASIN PROTECTION J ENTRANCE 964.43 INV= 955. �7 FENCE (TYP) - I -INSTALL CATCH RIM 964.RIM 959.98 ) I INV= 9 .26 BASIN PROTECTION (TYP) r^ (TYP) INV= 958.00 RIM= 964.88 I _j INV= 961.73 INSTALL CATCH NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BASIN PROTECTION OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION (TYP) FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER FOR WORK COMPLETED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. N O N C'7 O (0 O w W W J SCHULTZ ENGINEERING CD & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 > PH: (320) 339-0669 () FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Cr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS F- OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA O Iz 0 O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 0}C REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS © SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN SWPPP - PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1 "=30' I I I 0 30 60 �:3 e ease e Recommend castings for cleanouts in impervious surfaces EXISTING EXISTING HYDRANT v HYDRANT S _ _ e o e e . • : •° • • ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° CLEANOUT W/ RISER (SSCO2)-- ' <- - j Provide top and bottom of pipe RIM = 963.90 L r / I information at all utility crossings rr >> v TOP INV OF RISER = 954.19 �< < --- E BOTTOM INV OF RISER = 947.15 < _ n^ / n FM FM FM n - EXISTING Ft _ - / -- r HYDRANT FM FM / - - FM � / I CONNECT TO EXISTING ' � _ . _ WArff2 STUB - _-------- FM 0" DIP �1 FM - FM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a � sI --y----------- - -- -- -- - - - -------. -- ��- ----- - - I ------------ -- - 1 131.00 a rains a > tiht Eas men I ` - - - COIJNEC- TO E CISTIN \ �-� \ ---- - - - - - I� d 8" P'/C SAN. SEWER S'UB °I/� I oo l J, INV = 947.15 p� Y l l \\ (FIELD VEF4FY) I I 8" 450 BEND $„DIP INV= 951.25 1 --11��14 - 962 (2)8"I45°CLEANOUT 91 n------------- RIM =963.BENdS 963.31 N 88°47'24" E 139.00 -INV=955.55I 19%/% 19959.38 %o ST \\ I 1 1 ! I 1 I I 096953 _ Z96� I I 8" 450 BEND CD I \ I o 10-9 I 8" DIP COMBINED WATER I I I I y SERVICE W/ 8" GATE -7, 8" PVC SAN. SERVICE / I v 1 ! / i I \ I INV @ BLDG = 956.35 VALVE &BOX I Il I o ( I I I I I I PROPOSED BUILDING I I PROPOSED BUILDING 1 Provide top and bottom of pipe \ FFE = 964.85 I I FFE = 964.85 I information at all utility crossingsLU 966 ( I I ( 1 LU $ II { J J _ II I FM FM /Note, -3' raising adjustment shown would require an additional structure section or replacing the structure itself ro on I \ ([A T I -ADJUST EXISTING MANIH LE o I NEW RIM = 964.50 I I RIM= 964.01 RIM= 965.59 \ j j �jj/ ► I - _ -' 1a RIM= 964.24 - c 521 INV= 953.99 \ INV E/W_ 951.69 I INV E,W- 950.1 RIM= 96 - I INV= 958.14 I = 45L.61 �'\ j. I - INV f`52.b� c I I I I 6- - -1N-1 _� INV= 4 2100 I l --- - -- i--I I ••/ _------- -- -` ADJUST EXISTI MANHOLE I I I - I - > - -- - --+-- -- -- -- -- a-- - -- -- -- -- ---- NEW RIM =967.00IT) S I • %���> _ _ _ _ _ _'- - ----------------- 1 - -- - -- T T - - - - --------------------------------- II I ! : ------ �_, ressFasement - -I - - + - - - - ------ I ^n I I ,per Doc. No 1433685 \ I I I f I _ I I' i I DJUST EXISTING MANHOLE \ I I n I I W RIM= EXISTING L-��` _ i\-ADJUST XI�TINGOMANHOLE 964.75 l-- I 77 111 1 v HYDRANT ♦ J ----------- I I T NOTE: EXISTING �T r > I RIM= 964,'0 RIM= 3.97 I I TRANSFORMERTO- INV= 955. 7 I INV= 9 .26 I n I RIM= 964.06 - BE RELOCATED. RIM= 964.43 INV= 958.00 INV= 959.98 I I � V RIM= 964.88 I �j INV= 961.73 Note, -1' lowering adjustment Note, -1' lowering adjustment may require replacing a structure may require replacing a structure section or the structure itself UTILITY NOTES: section or the structure itself 1. WATER MAIN AND ANY WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. F- I 2. IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED WHERE WATER MAIN OR SERVICES CROSS EXISTING OR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, SERVICE LINES, OR STORM SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RAISED OR LOWERED APPROPRIATELY WHILE STILL MAINTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 3. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM SEWER CROSSES SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, OR ASSOCIATED SERVICES. INSULATION SHALL CONSIST OF AN 8-FT X 8-FT SQUARE OF 3"-THICK RIGID INSULATION. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE STORM SEWER AND PIPE CROSSING WITH THE EDGES OF THE INSULATION PARALLEL TO THE PIPING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. 4. INSTALL TRACER WIRE ALONG PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPE AS PER MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. https://www.mrwa.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/TracerW ireSpecGuideFi nalwebll.pdf 5. SEE SHEET C5 FOR STORM SEWER ELEVATIONS AND SLOPE, AND SHEET C2 & C3 FOR STANDARD DETAILS RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR STATE PLUMBING REVIEW, AND OBTAIN AN APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT FROM MNDLI, PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AFTER THE APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND ANY AND ALL PERTINENT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS AND IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO ORDER UTILITY MATERIALS AFTER APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM MNDLI It N O N C) O O W W W J SCHULTZ ENGINEERING CID & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 > PH: (320) 339-0669 (� FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Cr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS F- OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 Iz O O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 QREVISIONS Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS © SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN UTILITY PLAN SCALE: 1 "=30' 1 I 1 0 30 60 C9 Provide ped ramps meeting ADA requirements NOTE: REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND CURB & GUTTER AS NECESSARY NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FOR NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR WORK WITHIN REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. AND CURB & GUTTER AS NECESSARY PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. PdI AQ — — — — — — — ,.... ✓ i> i GUIItK W/ Z FI a ................ ........................... — — — — — — gren fit ressFasement �u i rER W/ ' -FT .......... ............. . .. ...... 2 CURB & ,per Doc. No.1433685 (. I I - TAPER (TYP) TAPER (TYP) `B61 .. 1. I (2) CONCRET �._ GUTTER (TYP) END CUR & 1 B612 CURB & — GUTTER w�/ 2-FT i ] I I..A:' I \B612 CURB & STEPS (TYP) ADA RAMP #12� L— -BITUMINOUS)TAPER (TYP)GUTTER (TYP) PER 7/C4 (TYP) MATCH EXISTING — — — — GUTTER (TYP) v CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER J TRAIL (TYP) — — — — I I SIDEWALK (TYP) Lr �T > >(TYP) LIGHT DUTY> > CONCRETE BITUMINOUS \I I CT MATCH EXISTING RIM 96 0 MATCH E G BACK OF CURB?/� //�\ MATCH EXISTING CURB CUT (TYP) RIM= 964.06 �� INV= 958.00 BACK OF CURB (TYP) NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER FOR WORK COMPLETED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. BITUMINO S PAVE_ NT (TYP) I NV= 55. ,7 SIDEWALK (TYP) TRAIL (rYP) II RIM= 964.43 INV= 959.98 - L-ADF RAMP 4#10 MATCH EXISTING MAT H EXISTING PER 3/C4(T(P) BITUMINOUS TRAIL v (TYP) RIM= 964.88 P EMENT (TYP) _F_ INV= 961.73 I) MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER (TYP) Provide to City prior to the start of work SURFACING NOTES: -BITUMINOUS TRAIL (TYP) NOTE: REMOV EKISTM44G BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AS C�SSARY FOR NEW DRIVEWAY ENT NCE.° REPLCE BITUMI OUS°PAVEMENT AS NEC SSPER(CITY REQUIREMENTS. ?B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) NOTE: CONTRA OR WkLL -OBTAIN ALL NEC SSARY PERMITS FOR WO K WITHIN THE PLIC RIGH-OF;,WAY. MATCH EXISTING N O N co O / O 1 Ar W C0 J G z) SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 PH: (320) 339-0669 U FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY rr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS � OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Z O U rr O OBRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 REVISIONS Q Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 J 1 xx/xx/2024 W rr Q_ CURB & GUTTER Show dimensioning of all (TYP) parking areas and entrances BITUMIN CVIPER -Include separate site plan REQUI `N NTS )TYP) as necessary 100 ° MAT C EXISTING PAVE I:NS tTYft r — D CURB & G R W/ 2-FT TAPER YP) 1 MATCH TING CURB &GUT F� (TYP) � \ ��l I I$ 1. SUBGRADES SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND COMPACTED AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN THE REQUIRED COMPACTION INDICATED IN THE GENERAL NOTES (SHEET Cl). TEST ROLLING OF THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR TECHNICIAN. LOCATIONS EXHIBITING EXCESSIVE RUTTING (PER MNDOT SPEC. 21 1 1) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE. COMPACTION TESTING IN UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM. 2. AGGREGATE BASE AND SURFACE COURSES SHALL BE ROLLED AND COMPACTED. TEST ROLLING OF THE AGGREGATE BASE AND/OR SURFACING SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY. MAXIMUM ALLOWED DEFLECTION DURING TEST ROLLING OF AGGREGATE BASE OR SURFACE COURSES SHALL BE 1/2". 3. ALL EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE EDGES, WHICH WILL ABUT NEW BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE SURFACING SHALL BE SAWCUT TO OBTAIN A VERTICAL EDGE. 4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE NEW CONCRETE ABUTS EXISTING CONCRETE, AND AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SEPARATE CONCRETE POURS ABUT EACH OTHER. 5. CONCRETE PAVEMENT OR APRONS, WHICH ABUT DOORWAY OPENINGS SHALL BE TIED TO THE FLOOR SLAB WITH #4 BARS ALONG THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE DOORWAY. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C3. 6. SEE SHEET Cl FOR SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF HARDSCAPES Provide ped ramps I meeting ADA requirements 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS (D SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX C1 -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN PAVING PLAN SCALE: 1 "=30' I I I 0 30 60 CIO Tk ciTv of � i�lontice_o June 20th, 2024 Re: Good Neighbor CUP City Planning File # 2024-29 General Comments PHONE:763-295-2711 Fax:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street I Suite 11 Monticello, MN 55362 The City is not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. After review of the most recent land use application plans dated 6-13-24 for the proposed development in the City of Monticello, we have determined the following based on the 2020 MN State Fire Code: 1. The applicant will verify that all access drive spacing in the parking lots are at least 24ft wide for aerial apparatus access and circulation within this lot. The allowed decrease is from the required 26 feet width specified in Fire Code Appendix D105.2. 2. The applicant will verify and provide full turning radius in access roads for the City's aerial apparatus as required in Fire Code Appendix D103.3. 3. The City of Monticello has adopted appendix P of the fire code. This requires that a building have adequate first responder radio coverage. Please work with the Fire Inspector to comply with this section. 4. The city requires that you install a fire keybox on the outside of your building. Please work with the Fire Inspector on this requirement. 5. We require that you work with the Fire Chief/Fire Inspector on locating your Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system. The Fire Inspector must approve the location before it is installed. www.ci.monticello.mn.us t ciTv of __ � NIontice-,---o PHONE:763-295-2711 FAx:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street I Suite 11 Monticello, MN 55362 6. Finally, we are requiring hydrant spacing at 400 feet based on Fire Code Section 507.5.1 exception number 2. These items are subject to approval of the Monticello Fire Chief and Fire Inspector. This is a preliminary list of items that would need to be addressed. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please contact the Department of Building Safety with any questions. Sincerely, & "ftwltAxtj� Chief Building Official/Zoning Administrator www.ci.monticello.mn.us (reserved for recording information) GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT , a Minnesota limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", in consideration of One and No/100 Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, a permanent easement for public sidewalk or trail and appurtenant purposes over, on, across, under and through the land situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit `B" (the 'Basement Property"). Appurtenant purposes of the easement shall include, and shall not be limited to landscaping, lighting, and public signage. INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the Easement Property at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public sidewalk or trail and appurtenant uses over, across, on, under, and through the Easement Property, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, and excavate the Easement Property, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other 173176v2 obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public sidewalk, trail and appurtenances. The above named Grantors, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are well seized in fee title of the above described Easement Property; that they have the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Easement Property; and that they will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantors hereto have signed this document this day of 92024. GRANTOR: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) [insert name] The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2024, by the of , Grantor. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 173176v2 2 EXHIBIT "A" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT A permanent easement for public sidewalk, trail and appurtenant purposes over, on, across, under and through ....... [insert legal description] 173176v2 EXHIBIT "B" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Insert Sketch 173176v2 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT ,a , which holds a mortgage on all or part of the property more particularly described in the foregoing Grant of Permanent Easement, which mortgage is dated and recorded as Document No. with the offices of the Wright County Recorder/Registrar of Titles, Minnesota, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, consents to, and is subject to the foregoing Grant of Permanent Easement. Dated this day of 12024. By: Its STATE OF ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2024, by , the a entity. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 [print name] [title] day of , of on behalf of the 173176v2 NON-EXCLUSIVE PARKING AND ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS NON-EXCLUSIVE PARKING AND ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT is made on this day of _ 2024, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ("City"), and , a (11 11). RECITALS WHEREAS, is the owner of real property located in Wrigrt County, Minnesota, as legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (" Parcel"). The Parcel includes a commercial building and a parking lot; WHEREAS, as a condition of City approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Permit within The Pointes at Cedar District, the parties are required to enter into and record this Cross Parking and Access Easement Agreement on the property referenced above; and WHEREAS, the City desires a non-exclusive easement for pedestrian and vehicular access and parking purposes over portions of the Parcel, specifically over a portion of parking areas as legally described and depicted in Exhibits `B" and "C" attached hereto ("Parking Easement Area") to serve as additional public parking areas; WHEREAS, agrees to grant the requested parking and access easement; NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1780430 1. Easement. hereby grants, creates and establishes for the benefit of the the City, its employees, agents, contractors, customers, guests, licensees, invitees, successors and assigns a non-exclusive easement for vehicular and pedestrian access and parking of motor vehicles in, to, over, across and through the Easement Area located on the Parcel. No fence or other barrier which would unreasonably prevent or obstruct the passage of pedestrian or vehicular travel shall be erected or permitted within or across parking and access facilities. 2. Ri2hts and Responsibilities. Use of the Easement Area pursuant to this Agreement is subject to the following rights, responsibilities, and limitations: A. Use. The City shall have the non-exclusive right to use the Easement Area to provide parking as it deems necessary. 3. Maintenance. shall be solely responsible for all costs of installation, repair, maintenance, and replacement associated with the improvements located within the Easement Area, including the parking areas and associated lighting, landscaping and signage. For improvements within the Easement Area, shall maintain, repair and when necessary, replace, the same so that the same is at all times in good working order, condition and repair, reasonable wear and tear excepted. The foregoing obligations to maintain, repair and when necessary, replace the improvements, shall include without limitation; (i) keeping all portions of the Easement Area in a clean and sanitary condition; (ii) removing, to the extent practical, snow from the Easement Area; (iii) keeping all marking and directional signs in the Easement Area, if any, clear, distinct, and legible; (iv) maintaining, patching, sealing, removing, and replacing the surface areas in the Easement Area as reasonably necessary and (v) providing signage reasonably acceptable to the City for the designated city parking stalls. 4. Indemnification. shall indemnify, keep and hold the City, its officers, employees, agents and assigns, free and harmless from any and all liability on account of injury or death of persons or damage to or depreciation in value of property occurring within the Easement Area, to the extent such injury, death, damage, or depreciation was caused by the negligence of , or the negligence of 's employees or agents. 5. Covenant Running With Land. It is intended that the easements, covenants, conditions, restrictions, right and obligations set forth herein shall run with the property and shall benefit to and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the respective ties. This Agreement shall bind every person having any fee, leasehold or other interest therein and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon he owners of the property identified herein, their permittees and their success, assigns, heirs and personal representatives. This Agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the owners from time to time of the. 6. Severability. The invalidity of any portion of this Agreement shall not impair in any manner the validity, enforceability or effect of the rest of this Agreement. 7. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one 1780430 and the same instrument. 8. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 9. Warranty of Title. represents and warrants to the City that is the only owner of fee simple title to the Easement Area, and that there are no owners or mortgages, contract for deed, leases, rental agreements, occupancy agreements, or any other encumbrances or verbal or written agreements of any nature whatsoever affecting title to the Easement Area. 10. Termination. This agreement shall automatically terminate by agreement of both parties. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement this day of 92024. CITY OF MONTICELLO M. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor Rachel Leonard, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2024, by Lloyd Hilgart and Rachel Leonard, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 1780430 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2024, by, the of a corporation. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452-5000 1780430 EXHIBIT "A" to GRANT OF EASEMENT Legal Description of Parcel: 178043v3 EXHIBIT "B" to GRANT OF EASEMENT Legal Description of Easement Area 178043v3 EXHIBIT "C" to GRANT OF EASEMENT Site Plan of Easement Areas on District Parcel 178043v3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-31 APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR A MONUMENT SIGN IN THE PCD, POINTES AT CEDAR DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting a variance to the setback requirements for a monument sign in the PCD, Pointes at Cedar District to shift the sign into the required setback; and WHEREAS, the zoning ordinance currently requires, subject to potential amendment, a setback for signs that requires such signs to be setback from the right of way at least 15 feet; and WHEREAS, the proposed sign is designed to mark the entrance to the site from the public street; and WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking the location to increase visibility of the sign from the street, which would otherwise be screened by parked vehicles if located to meet the required setback; and WHEREAS, the proposed sign is much smaller in size that otherwise could be developed and the site relies primarily on wall signage for visibility to the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the proposed sign will not obstruct traffic visibility for vehicles on the street or leaving the site at the driveway location; and WHEREAS, the applicant's use is not expected to create negative impacts or interference with the other commercial uses of the property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2nd, 2024 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the approval of the variance: 1. The applicant has demonstrated practical difficulties in using the property in a reasonable manner, due to the lack of visibility of a property located sign, which is the purpose of commercial signage. 2. The existing parcel is of otherwise sufficient size and area to accommodate the proposed use. 3. The proposed sign is more consistent with the City's intent to moderate large sign displays in favor of building architecture and wall or monument signage, and with the intent of The Pointes at Cedar District. 4. The proposed sign will not be inconsistent with area uses, nor create interference due to size and hours/days of operation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the requested variance is approved based on the conditions provided in Exhibit Z of the referenced staff planning report, as follows: 1. Provide additional signage detail regarding the proposed monument sign at the Chelsea entrance. 2. No freestanding (pole -mounted) signs shall be allowed on the site related to the hotel project. 3. Any additional recommendations of other Staff or Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 2024, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By:�,/� Andrew Tapper, V�c��Chair ATTEST: Angela*Schum,unity Development Director City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2L. Consideration of approving an Amendment to the Monticello Citv Code, Title XV: Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Sections 153.012 — Definitions, 153.028 — Specific Review Procedures & Requirements, 153.090 — Use Table, & 153.091— Use - Specific Standards related to Contractor's Yard — Temporarv, & Extraction of Minerals/Materials as Principal and Interim Uses including Definitions, Use -Specific Standards, & other regulations as necessary to define and limit the intent or application of the proposed amendment. Applicant: Citv of Monticello Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Stephen Grittman, Grittman Consulting, 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item City Planner Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City City Administrator Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, Chief Building Official ACTION REQUESTED Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the ordinance amendment. Motion to approve Ordinance 830 for Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Sections 153.012 — Definitions, 153.028 — Specific Review Procedures & Requirements, 153.090 — Use Table, and 153.091— Use -Specific Standards related to Contractor's Yars — Temporary, and Extraction of Minerals/Materials as a Principal and Interim Uses including Definitions, Use - Specific Standards, based on findings in Resolution No. PC-2024-22. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: N/A PID #: N/A Planning Case Number: 2024-24 Request(s): Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regulating Extraction of Materials/Minerals and Temporary Contractors' Yards, and facilities related to such uses. Deadline for Decision: July 7, 2024 (60-day deadline) September 5, 2024 (120-day deadline) Land Use Designation: N/A City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 Zoning Designation: N/A Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: N/A Current Site Uses: N/A Surrounding Land Uses: N/A Project Description: The proposed amendments supplement existing City zoning regulations managing the temporary use of land for construction of public infrastructure and/or materials mining activities. By their nature, these uses are limited in time, but for their duration, have the potential for significant impacts on both the surrounding area in which they are located, the streets and other infrastructure they utilize during their operation, as well as the condition and future use of the land they occupy. ANALYSIS City staff proposes a series of amendments to the regulations pertaining to the use classification "Extraction of minerals." The updates are valuable improvements over the existing language, better protecting the City, the neighborhoods which may be near these uses, and the public infrastructure used or impacted by these activities. The amendments were initiated as a result of recent inquiries into potential mining activities within the City, as well as familiarity with Wright County's recent efforts to improve their mining ordinance. The Definitions are designed to better identify the uses or processes of Extraction and Excavation, and then the allowance for Temporary Contractor's Yards within certain locations. For the first two, the distinction is that Extraction is designed to excavate for the purpose of removing the soil contents for use elsewhere — such as sand or gravel. Excavation is a grading activity, and while material may be removed from the site, it is specifically related to a construction project. The additional Extraction language is drawn largely from the recent updated amendments made to the Wright County zoning regulations, which are also effective in the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area. The ordinances do not align perfectly as the proposed City regulations are slightly more restrictive in some areas. The attached ordinance language is presented in redline, relating to Definitions (Section 153.012) and three sets of Industrial Use Standards in Section 153.091 related to Temporary Contractor's Yard (F)(4), Extraction of Materials (F)(5), and Land Reclamation (F)(6). City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 The regulations proposed include additional Definitions language for Extractive Use (by adding reference to local ordinance regulations) and Contractor's Yard —Temporary (creating a new Definition. For Temporary Contractor's Yards, the proposed amendment adds language related to the protection of local streets from the heavy use by contractor's equipment. This specifically keeps such traffic from residential streets, except when the City Engineer finds that a particular local street is needed for access to a construction site. For Extraction, the proposed amendment makes two technical changes - (1) Limiting the Interim Use Permit period to a 5-year interval, after which a new IUP would be required, and (2) add the Pointes at Cedar District to a viable location for extractive uses and deleting prior commercial district language. The proposed language further adds a significant amount of clarifying detail to the expectations for Extraction IUPs, including performance standards, submission requirements, and financial security provisions. As noted above, much of this language is borrowed from the Wright County ordinances. Finally, a Land Reclamation plan is also included as an integral part of an Extraction IUP. Land Reclamation permits require a separate Conditional Use Permit. Budget Impact: The Planning & Zoning budget will absorb the cost of the consulting planner's work on this item. The department budget includes funding for general ordinance development. II. Staff Workload Impact: Approximately 6-8 hours were spent in the review and development of this ordinance by planning and engineering staff. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: This ordinance amendment is proposed to improve existing ordinance language, reducing the potential for conflict in land use and adapting to changing development conditions. These objectives are in support of the following Monticello 2040 policy statement: Use zoning regulations to focus the city's growth, improve the downtown, create complete neighborhoods, achieve compatibility between adjacent uses, address land use conflicts, promote employment and economic vitality, and protect the health and safety of the city's residents, workers and visitors. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and held a public hearing on the item during its regular meeting on July 2, 2024. Planner Grittman noted County's thorough review and public process in developing their ordinance. He indicated that review was the basis for Monticello's amendments. No public was present to address the Commission on this item. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 Following discussion, the Commission recommended the amendment unanimously. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the amendments; the amendments to strengthen the City's ability to manage mining and extraction uses. While it is acknowledged that utilization of the sand and gravel resources is a necessary requirement of responsible development, these uses can also create significant impacts on the locations in which they are sited. The proposed amendments are intended to address those impacts. SUPPORTING DATA A. Ordinance No. 830 B. Resolution PC-2024-22 C. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts D. Wright County Ordinance, Excerpts E. Monticello Official Zoning Map ORDINANCE NO. 830 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE XV, CHAPTER 153.012, DEFINITIONS, AND SECTION 153.091 RELATED TO REQUIREMENTS REGULATING THE EXTRACTION OF NON-METALLIC MINERALS AND TEMORARY CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SECTION 1. § 153.012 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended to add the following: EXCAVATION. The process of reshaping land at a construction site. This can include raising or lowering ground levels, adding or removiniz slopes or leveliniz the round surface. In general, it has two main purposes: Creating proper drainage. Preparing land to bear weight. Excavation May remove soil or other materials from a site, but is distinguished from "Extraction" in that Excavation is specifically related to a construction project. Also "Grading". SECTION 2. § 153.012 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended to delete the following: SECTION 3. § 153.012 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended to read as follows: EXTRACTIVE USE. The use of land for surface or subsurface removal of materials for use off - site, including but not limited to sand, gravel, rock, 40a,3tricl minim other nonmetallic minerals, and peat not regulated under M.S. §§ 93.44 to 93.51, and as regulated by this Chapter, as they may be amended from time to time. Also "Mining". CONTRACTORS YARD —TEMPORARY. A location on which a construction contractor operating with a current permit for construction of public utilities, infrastructure, or other proiect on public property, rights-of-wav, or public easements, stores equipment, temporary office space, vehicles, and materials for no more than a two-vear period. SECTION 4. § 153.090 — Use Table is amended to read as follows: G.,+r-,C+;„n l,f al_C Extractive use SECTION 5. § 153.091 (F)(5) is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 6. § 153.091 (F)(5) is hereby amended to read as follows: (5) Extractive Uses. (a) All regulations in this chapter shall be met. (b) Plans shall be provided to illustrate how the land will be left in a useable condition upon cessation of extraction activities, shall prove that the finished grade will not adverselv affect the surrounding land or future development of the site on which the mining is being conducted, and the route of trucks moving to and from the site. (c) The interim use permit authorizing the extraction of materials shall regulate: 1. The tvpe(s) of material being mined on the site; 2. A program for rodent control; 3. A plan for fire control and general maintenance of the sib 4. Controls for vehicular ingress and egress, and for control of material disbursed from wind or hauling of material to or from the site; 5. A calendar of specific dates when mining operations will be conducted, including specific beginning and ending dates, but not fora period exceeding five 51 vears from beginning to end of permit; and 6. The submission of a surety by the applicant in an amount determined by the Communitv Development Department to be equal to 100% of the value of the cost of restoring land whereupon mining is to occur and repairing the degradation of roadways used to transport soils. (d) On -site sales may be allowed as part of the interim use permit subject to all conditions established by the Citv Council to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of those visiting the site and of surrounding property owners. (e) For extraction of materials under this section within the Pointes at Cedar zoning district, no such permit shall be issued except where: 1. The citv has an interest in the subiect property ownership; 2. The citv is conducting the extraction under a contract with the fee title owner or representative; or 3. The citv approves such a permit for another government agencv and/or its contractor for a public proiect. (f) In the Pointes at Cedar (PCD) or A-O Districts, and at the citv's sole discretion, the IUP under this section may include screening, concrete mixing, asphalt plant operation, or other activities utilizing the raw materials being extracted from the site, provided the citv finds that no adverse impact on adioininR propertv use will occur, including, but not limited to, noise, odors, dust, or other particulate matter. OA (g) For the purposes of this section, mining or excavation shall mean solely the removal of minerals, including sand, stone, clav, gravel, or soil in quantities of more than 100 cubic vards, and hauling of said materials from the site. For quantities of less than 100 cubic vards, or for proiects that extract and relocate the materials on the same project site regardless of quantitv, administrative grading permits may be issued without need for an IUP. (h) For extraction operations which will last only one season, such as for public road construction proiects, the Citv Council may issue a temporary extraction permit. Such permit may include the placement of a bituminous hot mix plant and other accessory equipment. Said permits shall only apply if the extraction site is to be opened, closed and reclaimed within one year. The Zoning Administrator may waive some of the information required by division (C) below in the case of a temporary extraction permit. A temporary extraction permit shall be administered as an interim use permit. (i) For extraction operations issued an Interim Use Permit under this section, the City may, at its sole discretion, approve the import of recyclable concrete or asphalt materials for the purpose of crushing and re -use of those materials off -site. No crushing, washing, refining, processing, or other recvcling machinery shall be operated within 500 feet of any residential property boundary, nor shall such machinery be operated for more than two (2) weeks in any calendar year. Anv such crushing or similar activity shall be operational only during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. (i) Any extraction IUP issued under this Section (5) shall include, as a component of the IUP, a mandatory Land Reclamation permit, as regulated under Section 153.091(F) (10) of this Section. (k) Information required. The following information shall be provided by the person requesting the permit: 1 Name and address of person requesting the extraction permit; 2 The exact legal property description and acreage of area to be mined; 3 The following maps of the entire site and to include all areas within 100 feet of the site. (a) Map A, existing conditions to include: (1) Contour lines at five two -foot intervals; (2) Existing vegetation; (3) Existing drainage and permanent water areas; (4) Existing structures; and (5) Existing wells. (b) Map B, proposed operations to include: (1) Structures to be erected; (2) Location of sites to be mined showing depth of proposed excavation; 3 (3) Location of tailings deposits showing maximum height of deposits; (4) Location of machinery to be used in the extraction operation; (5) Location of storage of mined materials, showing height of storage deposits; (6)Location of vehicle parking, truck staging, queueing, or stacking area, access roads and local truck routes; (7) Location of storage of explosives, equipment, and other equipment materials; (8) Erosion and sediment control structures; - (9) Screening, berms, and proposed plantings, and (10) Location of leak containment structures, in the event of a petrochemical leak or spill. (c) Map C, reclamation plan to include: (1) All of the information required in Land Reclamation, Section 153.091 (F)(10). I Financial Guarantee The Citv shall require a cash escrow, or irrevocable letter of credit in a form and from a financial institution acceptable to the City, to guarantee compliance with this Ordinance and terms and specifications of the interim use permit. The City shall have the right to use the financial guarantee to remove stockpiles, complete site rehabilitation, and correct other deficiencies or rp oblems, in the event the owner or operator is in default of the permit obligations. The amount of financial guarantee shall be equal to five thousand 5 000) dollars for every - permitted acre or anv other amount deemed acceptable by the City Council. The financial guarantee may be adjusted periodically to reflect ongoing progress, at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator, and shall remain in full force and effect until all conditions of the permit have been met, including site restoration. (m) Exceptions — An extraction permit shall not be required for anv of the following: 1 Excavation for a foundation, basement, or other building activitv, if such work has been properly permitted. 2 Excavation by city authorities or their contractors in connection with construction and maintenance of roads, highways, bridges, stormwater management proiects, parks or utilities within the citv limits of the Citv of Monticello, conducted solelv within the related easement areas or rights-of-way. 3 Grading and removal of materials in accordance with the development of an approved plat or development, if the activitv was reviewed as part of the approval process. SECTION 7. § 153.091 (F)(4) is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 8. § 153.091 (F)(4) is hereby amended to read as follows: M (4) Temporary Contractor's Yards. (a) Temporary contractor's vards shall be allowed onlv by interim use permit, subject to the standards of § 153.028(E). (b) Temporary contractor's vards shall be accommodated onlv in association with the construction of public infrastructure proiects on public property, rights-of-wav, or public easements. (c) Temporary contractor's vards shall be located onlv on propertv directiv abutting a county, state or federal highwav, and shall minimize use of local streets. No local streets may be used by Temporary Contractor eauipment, with the exception of streets or utilities currently under construction or reconstruction for that purpose, or which are deemed necessary for such use by the Citv Engineer to provide access to a permitted construction site. (d) Such vards shall provide haul routes for approval by the Citv Engineer. (e) Such vards shall provide adeauate securities, as determined by the Citv Council, for the restoration of anv municipal infrastructure damagA due to the operation of the yard. (f) Such yards shall provide, as a condition of their permit, for adequate stormwater management, dust control, traffic con#rol, and other requirements of the Citv Engineer. JR) Interim use permits for tempRorary con tractor '§ vards shall include a restoration plan ensuring the restoration of the property to a condition rrieeting the zoning and nuisance standards of the cite. SECTION 9. § 153.091 (F)(10) is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 10. § 153.091 (F)(10) is hereby amended to read as follows: (10) Land reclamation. The interim use permit authorizing land reclamation shall require: (a) A finished grade plan which will not adverselv affect the adjacent land; (b) The tvpe of fill permitted; (c) A program for rodent control; (d) A plan for fire control and general maintenance of the site; (e) Controls for vehicular ingress and egress, and for control of material disbursed from wind or hauling of material to or from the site; (f) A soil erosion and sediment control plan; W A calendar of specific dates when land reclamation operations will be conducted, including specific beginning and ending dates; and (h) The submission of a suretv by the applicant in an amount determined by the Communitv Development Department to be eaual to 100% of the value of the cost of restoring land whereupon land reclamation is to occur and repairing the degradation of roadways used to transport soils. (i) Unless otherwise reauired by the Citv Council, a minimum of four (4) inches of clean, uncontaminated topsoil shall be placed on all final graded and rehabilitated areas. The peaks and depressions of the area shall be graded and backfilled to a surface which will result in a gently rolling topographv in substantial conformitv to the land area immediatelv surrounding area, and which will minimize erosion due to rainfall. No finished slope shall exceed 25% in grade. SECTION 11. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Chapter 153, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables, chapters and sections accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. SECTION 12. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk AYES: NAYS: Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor on CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-22 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED TO EXTRACTION OF MATERIALS, LAND RECLAMATION, AND TEMPORARY CONTRACTOR'S YARDS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello regulates Extraction of Materials, Land Reclamation, and Temporary Contractor's Yards by Interim Use Permit in a variety of locations; and WHEREAS, the zoning regulations applicable to these uses both facilitate and limit their locations in ways that the City finds are inadequate to utilize the resources while providing for adequate protections; and WHEREAS, the City finds that revision of the Code to add more specificity and direction is in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2nd, 2024 on the application and the applicant City of Monticello and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The zoning amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan by focusing the ordinance regulations on the needs of the community. 2. The proposed amendment makes no other changes to the nature of uses that would otherwise exist in commercial or industrial districts. 3. The change in zoning language will accommodate reasonable and efficient operation of existing or new mining or contractor's facilities when working on public projects. 4. The change in language will have no expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve commercial uses as expected. 5. The existing language of the code will benefit from additional consistency with the requirements of Wright County which are effective in the MOAA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE /T RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the zoning amendment to modify the regulations applicable to Extraction of Materials, Land Reclamation, and Temporary Contractor's Yards as defined in the proposed ordinance. ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 2024, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-2024-22 MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION B✓ /�4e� Andrew Tapper, ' air ATTEST: Angela Schum n o munity Development Director § 153.012 DEFINITIONS. EXTRACTION OF MATERIALS. The development or extraction of a natural resource in excess of 400 cubic yards from its natural occurrences on affected land without processing. EXTRACTIVE USE. The use of land for surface or subsurface removal of sand, gravel, rock, industrial minerals, other nonmetallic minerals, and peat not regulated under M.S. §§ 93.44 to 93.51, as they may be amended from time to time. LAND RECLAMATION. The reclaiming of land by the importation, depositing, or grading of soils in excess of 400 cubic yards so as to elevate the grade. § 153.090 USE TABLE. Use Types "P" = Permitted "C" = Conditionally Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted Industrial Uses Contractor's yard, temporary Extraction of minerals TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Base Zoning Districts A R R R T R R M B B B B CCD O A 1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 I See I I Table 5- IA Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C Additional Requirements PCD I I 1 C 1 2 I I I § 153.091(17)(4) See Ordinance I I § 153.091(F)(5) No. C C C § 153.091(17)(9) § 153.091 USE -SPECIFIC STANDARDS. (F) Regulations for industrial uses. (4) Contractors yard — temporary. (a) Temporary contractor's yards shall be allowed only by interim use permit, subject to the standards of § 153.028(E). (b) Temporary contractor's yards shall be accommodated only in association with the construction of public infrastructure projects on public property, rights -of -way, or public easements. (c) Temporary contractor's yards shall be located only on property directly abutting a state or federal highway, and shall minimize use of local streets. (d) Such yards shall provide haul routes for approval by the City Engineer. (e) Such yards shall provide adequate securities, as determined by the City Council, for the restoration of any municipal infrastructure damaged due to the operation of the yard. (f) Such yards shall provide, as a condition of their permit, for adequate stormwater management, dust control, traffic control, and other requirements of the City Engineer. (g) Interim use permits for temporary contractor's yards shall include a restoration plan ensuring the restoration of the property to a condition meeting the zoning and nuisance standards of the city. (5) Extraction of materials. (a) All regulations in this chapter shall be met. (b) Plans shall be provided to illustrate how the land will be left in a useable condition upon cessation of extraction activities, shall prove that the finished grade will not adversely affect the surrounding land or future development of the site on which the mining is being conducted, and the route of trucks moving to and from the site. (c) The interim use permit authorizing the extraction of materials shall regulate: 1. The type(s) of material being mined on the site; 2. A program for rodent control; 3. A plan for fire control and general maintenance of the site; 4. Controls for vehicular ingress and egress, and for control of material disbursed from wind or hauling of material to or from the site; 5. A calendar of specific dates when mining operations will be conducted, including specific beginning and ending dates; and 6. The submission of a surety by the applicant in an amount determined by the Community Development Department to be equal to 100% of the value of the cost of restoring land whereupon mining is to occur and repairing the degradation of roadways used to transport soils. (d) On -site sales may be allowed as part of the interim use permit subject to all conditions established by the City Council to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of those visiting the site and of surrounding property owners. (e) For extraction of materials under this section within the B-3 and B-4 zoning districts, no such permit shall be issued except where: 1. The city has an interest in the subject property ownership; 2. The city is conducting the extraction under a contract with the fee title owner or representative; or 3. The city approves such a permit for another government agency and/or its contractor for a public project. (f) In the B-3 and B-4 Districts, and at the city's sole discretion, the UP under this section may include screening, concrete mixing, asphalt plant operation, or other activities utilizing the raw materials being extracted from the site, provided the city finds that no adverse impact on adjoining property use will occur, including, but not limited to, noise, odors, dust, or other particulate matter. (g) For the purposes of this section, mining or excavation shall mean solely the removal of minerals, including sand, stone, clay, gravel, or soil in quantities of more than 100 cubic yards, and hauling of said materials from the site. For quantities of less than 100 cubic yards, or for projects that extract and relocate the materials on the same project site regardless of quantity, administrative grading permits may be issued without need for an IUP. (10) Land reclamation. The conditional use permit authorizing land reclamation shall regulate: (a) A finished grade plan which will not adversely affect the adjacent land; (b) The type of fill permitted; (c) A program for rodent control; (d) A plan for fire control and general maintenance of the site; (e) Controls for vehicular ingress and egress, and for control of material disbursed from wind or hauling of material to or from the site; (f) A calendar of specific dates when land reclamation operations will be conducted, including specific beginning and ending dates; and (g) The submission of a surety by the applicant in an amount determined by the Community Development Department to be equal to 100% of the value of the cost of restoring land whereupon land reclamation is to occur and repairing the degradation of roadways used to transport soils. Wriqht Countv, MN Code of Ordinances § 155.003 RULES AND DEFINITIONS. (30) CONTRACTORS YARD, NON-COMMERCIAL. Buildings and structures, including limited outdoor storage, located on the homestead of a contractor in the building trades or other similar business, for the purpose of storing machinery and equipment related to the business which is primarily conducted off -site. All storage and screening requirements in §§ 155.076 through 155.079 of this chapter must be met, all building size requirements must be met and the use must be clearly incidental to the primary use of the property as a homestead. (Pre-existing yards will not be required to obtain an interim use permit; provided, all ordinance requirements are met.) (43) EXTRACTIONAREA. Any non-agricultural artificial excavation of earth exceeding fifty square feet of surface area or two feet in depth, excavated or made by the removal from the natural surface of the earth, or sod, soil, sand, gravel, stone or other natural matter, or made by turning, or breaking or undermining of the earth. (92) MINING. The extraction of sand, gravel, rock, soil or other material from the land in the amount of one thousand cubic yards or more and the removing thereof from the site shall be MINING. The only exclusion from this definition shall be removal of minerals associated with construction of a building provided such removal is an approved item in the building permit. § 155.075 PURPOSE. (A) The performance standards established in this subchapter are designed to encourage a high standard of development by providing assurance that neighboring land uses will be compatible. The performance standards are designed to prevent and eliminate those conditions that cause blight. All future development in all districts shall be required to meet these standards. The standards shall also apply to existing development where so stated. The County Board shall be responsible for enforcing the standards. (B) (1) Before any building permit is approved, the Zoning Administrator shall determine whether the proposed use will conform to the performance standards. The developer or land owners shall supply data necessary to demonstrate such conformance. (2) Such data may include description of equipment to be used, hours of operation, method of refuse disposal and type and location of exterior storage. § 155.100 MINING AND EXTRACTION. (A) Purpose. Modern lifestyles create the indisputable need for a continued and uninterrupted supply of aggregate material. Accordingly, mining is a necessary land use that shall be balanced with the impact on the environment, health, welfare, safety, and quality of life of Wright County residents and future generations. The purpose of this section is to regulate mining operations so as to minimize conflicts with adjacent land uses and ensure that mining operations are reclaimed with a use compatible with surrounding land uses and a use as designated in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. (B) Administration; permit review. (1) An interim use permit shall be required for all commercial mining operations. Said permit shall be valid for a period of time set by the County Planning Commission but shall not exceed ten years; after which, a new interim use permit shall be required. Except that an interim use permit for a hot mix asphalt plant shall not be issued for a term in excess of two years. (2) Persons requesting a mining permit shall submit said fee to the County Planning Commission together with all information required in this section. (3) For mining operations which will last only one season, such as for road projects, the Planning Commission may issue a temporary mining permit. Such permit may include the placement of a bituminous hot mix plant and other accessory equipment. Said permits shall only apply if the mining site is to be opened, closed and reclaimed within one year. The Zoning Administrator may waive some of the information required by division (C) below in the case of a temporary mining permit. A temporary mining permit shall be administered as an interim use permit. (4) If the request is denied, no reapplication shall be made for a period of six months. (C) Information required. The following information shall be provided by the person requesting the permit: (1) Name and address of person requesting the mining permit; (2) The exact legal property description and acreage of area to be mined; (3) The following maps of the entire site and to include all areas within 500 feet of the site. All maps shall be drawn to a scale as determined by the Zoning Administrator and submitted on scale -size paper, otherwise stated below: (a) Map A, existing conditions to include: 1. Contour lines at two -foot intervals; 2. Existing vegetation; 3. Existing drainage and permanent water areas; 4. Existing structures; and 5. Existing wells. (b) Map B, proposed operations to include: 1. Structures to be erected; 2. Location of sites to be mined showing depth of proposed excavation; 3. Location of tailings deposits showing maximum height of deposits; 4. Location of machinery to be used in the mining operation; 5. Location of storage of mined materials, showing height of storage deposits; 6. Location of vehicle parking, truck staging, queueing, or stacking area, access roads and local truck routes; 7. Location of storage of explosives, equipment, and other materials; 8. Erosion and sediment control structures; 9. Screening, berms, and proposed plantings; and 10. Location of leak containment structures, in the event of a petrochemical leak or spill. (c) Map C, end use plan to include: 1. Final grade of proposed site showing elevations and contour lines at two -foot intervals; 2. Location and species of vegetation to be replanted; and 3. Location and nature of any structures to be erected in relation to the end use plan. (4) A soil erosion and sediment control plan; (5) A plan for dust and noise control; (6) A full and adequate description of all phases of the proposed operation to include an estimate of duration of the mining operation; and (7) Any other information requested by the Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator. (D) Use restrictions. (1) Mining operations shall be an interim use in the Agricultural District. (2) The crushing, washing, refining or processing, other than the initial removal of material, shall be considered a separate interim use. (3) In stone quarries, the production or manufacturing of veneer stone, sills, lintels, cut flagstone, hearthstones, paving stone and similar architectural or structural stone and the storing or stockpiling of such products on the site shall be considered a separate interim use. (4) The manufacture of concrete building blocks or other similar blocks, the production or manufacture of lime products, the production of ready -mixed concrete and any similar production or manufacturing processes which might be related to the mining operation shall be considered as a separate interim use. (5) The crushing, heating, storage, washing, refining, or processing of asphalt or bituminous material for the production of bituminous asphalt material shall be considered a separate interim use. (6) A new interim use permit shall be required for any mining operation where the amount of imported material exceeds the amount of material extracted or the primary use changes from the extraction of aggregate resources to the processing of materials. (7) The Planning Commission may impose additional performance standards as part of the interim use permit. (E) Performance standards. (1) General provisions. (a) Weeds and any other unsightly or noxious vegetation shall be cut or trimmed as may be necessary to preserve a reasonably neat appearance and to prevent seeding on adjoining property. (b) No sand and gravel operation shall be conducted on parcels of less than 20 acres in size. This limitation shall not apply when the tract of land is contiguous to an active mining operation, provided that both tracts are being operated by the same sand and gravel producer. (c) All equipment used for mining operations shall be constructed, maintained and operated in such a manner as to minimize, as far as is practicable, noises and vibrations which are injurious or substantially annoying to persons living in the vicinity. All non -conforming uses shall apply for and obtain an interim use permit. (d) All hot mix asphalt plants must utilize odor control technology or additives to reduce the odors emitted from the hot mix asphalt plant. The applicant for a hot mix asphalt plant interim use permit shall state in their application the means and methods they will be utilizing for effective odor control. Any technologies or products used must be stated in the annual report if required under § 155.100(I). (2) Water resources. (a) The mining operation shall not be allowed to interfere with surface water drainage beyond the boundaries of the mining operation. (b) The mining operation shall not adversely affect the quality of surface or subsurface water resources. (c) Surface water originating outside and passing through the mining district shall, at its point of departure from the mining site, be of equal quality to the water at the point where it enters the mining site. The mining operator shall perform any water treatment necessary to comply with this provision. (3) Safety fencing. Any mining operation adjacent to a residential zone or within 300 feet of two or more residential structures shall comply with the following standards. (a) Where collections of water occur that are one and one-half feet or more in depth existing for any period of at least one month, and occupy an area of 700 square feet or more, all access to such collections of water shall be barred by a fence or some similarly effective barrier such as a snow fence at least four feet in height. (b) In locations where slopes occur that are steeper than one foot vertical to three feet horizontal existing for a period of one month or more, access to such slopes shall be barred by a fence or some similarly effective barrier such as a snow fence of at least four feet in height. (4) Mining access roads. The location of the intersection of mining access roads with any public roads shall be selected such that traffic on the access roads will have a sufficient distance of the public road in view so that any turns onto the public road can be completed with a margin of safety. Access roads connecting to public roads or highways shall be sufficiently wide to accommodate two-way hauling traffic. Intersections of public roads with access roads shall be maintained by the mine operator and shall be kept clean and free from mud, debris or asphalt tracked out from the mining site. Such intersections shall also be repaired by the mine operator if the public road surface or shoulders have broken down due to repeated traffic by mining trucks and equipment. The need for turn lanes, road improvements, maintenance, or repair will be determined by the road authority. Upon written notification from a local road authority directing the repair, maintenance, or other such actions due to the repeated traffic by mining trucks and equipment, the property owner or operator shall have 14 days to comply with the directives of the local road authority. If the property owner or operator fails to comply within that time, the Zoning Administrator may suspend any interim mining permit. Any suspension shall be in effect until all conditions or requirements from the local road authority are brought into compliance. No mining, extraction, or processing activities shall occur during a suspension. (5) Screening barrier. (a) To minimize problems of dust and noise and to shield mining operations from public view, a screening barrier shall be maintained between the mining site and adjacent residential and commercial properties. A screening barrier shall also be required between the mining site and any public road within 500 feet of any mining or processing operations. The type and extent of the barrier shall be set by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may waive or alter screening requirements in this section. (b) Existing trees and ground cover along public road frontage or property lines shall be preserved and maintained (or supplemented), for the depth of the roadside or property line setback, except where traffic safety requires cutting and trimming. (c) Any trees or shrubs approved for use as a screening barrier must be mature and at least six feet in height. Any tree or shrub which is overcome with disease or that is deceased must be replaced with a new mature tree at least six feet in height and of the same type within 30 days. All trees and shrubs must be irrigated as needed to prevent disease or death. (6) Setback. (a) Processing of minerals shall not be conducted closer than 100 feet to the property line, nor closer than 500 feet to any residential or commercial structures located prior to commencement of processing operations. The processing of minerals shall not be conducted within shoreland principal structure setback distances. (b) Mining operations, not to include berms or screening barriers, shall not be conducted closer than 30 feet to the boundary of an adjoining property line. (c) Unless approved in writing by the applicable road authority, mining operations, not to include berms or screening barriers, shall not be conducted closer than 30 feet to the right-of-way line of any existing or platted street, road or highway; except that, excavating may be conducted within such limits in order to reduce the elevation thereof in conformity to the existing or platted street, road or highway. (7) Appearance. All buildings, structures and plants used for the production of processing of sand and gravel shall be maintained in such a manner as is practicable and according to acceptable industrial practice as to assure that such buildings, structures and plants will not become dangerously dilapidated. (8) Days and hours of operation. (a) All mining operations shall be conducted between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless otherwise specified by the Planning Commission; (b) Any operations not conducted between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. shall require a new or amended interim use permit. Such permits shall be granted for public or private emergency, for government work required by agency contracts, or whenever any reasonable or necessary repairs to equipment are required to be made. (c) Operations shall include the loading and unloading of trucks and the moving and processing of materials. Trucks may enter the mining site no earlier than 6:00 a.m. and leave the mining site no later than 7:00 p.m. At no time may trucks park, queue, or stack on public rights -of -way. The Planning Commission may authorize work outside of the restrictions stated herein as part of an interim use permit hearing. (d) Operations shall be prohibited on county designated holidays as of January 1, 2023. (9) Dust and dirt. (a) All equipment used for mining operations shall be constructed, maintained and operated in such a manner as to minimize, as far as practicable, dust conditions. (b) All mining operators will be responsible for providing water or other suitable methods to control dust on roads utilized by trucks hauling to or from mining operations. Roads that require cleaning or dust control because of mining operations shall be tended to when conditions warrant, or a potential safety hazard exists. (c) The Planning Commission may require dust control measures within mining operations when it is determined that airborne dust from extraction areas, processing activities, stockpiles, internal roads, or other mining related activities may create a public nuisance. Such dust control measures may include berming, landscaping, or enclosures for processing equipment. (10) Signage. An information sign shall be erected at the intersection of the primary access road and the public road servicing the site identifying the name of the company or landowner responsible for the operations at the site. This sign shall also include a telephone number(s) for the company or responsible landowner, shall be clearly visible from the public road, and shall conform to the signage requirements in § 155.097 of this chapter. (11) Other regulations. All operations must abide by all other local, state, and federal rules, laws, regulations and provisions. Any violation of these other provisions may result in the revocation of the interim use permit. (12) Inactivity. In the event less than 10,000 cubic yards of material has been removed from the mining operation in any five-year period, as indicated through the Aggregate Removal Tax program, the Planning Commission may require a hearing to review the facility and may terminate the mining permit. (F) Land rehabilitation. All mining sites shall be rehabilitated immediately after mining operations cease. The Planning Commission shall review and require a staged reclamation when applicable. Rehabilitation shall be complete within one year or within the terms specified in the interim use permit. The following standards shall apply. (1) Within 12 months after completion of mining activities or after termination of the permit, all equipment, vehicles, machinery, structures, processing plants, materials, and debris shall be removed from the site. (2) Unless otherwise stated by the Planning Commission, a minimum of four inches of clean, uncontaminated topsoil shall be placed on all final graded and rehabilitated areas. The peaks and depressions of the area shall be graded and backfilled to a surface which will result in a gently rolling topography in substantial conformity to the land area immediately surrounding area, and which will minimize erosion due to rainfall. No finished slope shall exceed 25% in grade. (3) For reclaimed areas that include water features, the banks of such features shall be sloped to the water line at a slope no greater than two feet horizontal to one foot vertical. (4) All restored areas shall be seeded with a mixture consistent with Minnesota Department of Transportation specifications for rights -of -way or a mixture recommended by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District, or returned to crop production, unless otherwise specified or approved by the Planning Commission. (5) The finished grade shall be such that it will not adversely affect the surrounding land or future development of the site upon which mining operations have been conducted. The finished plan shall restore the mining site to a condition whereby it can be utilized for the type of land use proposed to occupy the site after mining operations cease. (6) Unless otherwise amended or approved by the Planning Commission, all final grades and site restoration shall be consistent with Map C, the End Use Plan. (G) Financial guarantee. The county shall require a performance bond, cash escrow, or irrevocable letter of credit in a form and from a financial institution acceptable to the county, to guarantee compliance with this chapter and terms and specifications of the interim use permit. The county shall have the right to use the financial guarantee to remove stockpiles, complete site rehabilitation, and correct other deficiencies or problems, in the event the owner or operator is in default of the permit obligations. The amount of financial guarantee shall be equal to $5,000 for every permitted acre or any other amount deemed acceptable by the Planning Commission. The financial guarantee may be adjusted periodically to reflect ongoing progress, at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator, and shall remain in full force and effect until all conditions of the permit have been met, including site restoration. (H) Exceptions. A mining and extraction permit shall not be required for any of the following: (1) Excavation for a foundation, cellar, or basement of a building or subsurface sewage treatment system, if such work has been properly permitted. (2) Excavation by state, county, city, or township authorities in connection with construction and maintenance of roads, highways, bridges, or utilities conducted solely within the permanent easement areas or rights -of -way. (3) Grading and removal of materials in accordance with the development of an approved plat or development, if the activity was reviewed as part of the approval process. (I) Annual report. All property owners and operators with an active conditional or interim use permit, regardless of when the permit was issued, for mining shall submit for the previous year an annual report, on a form as provided by the Office of Planning and Zoning, to the Zoning Administrator in paper and electronic portable document format ("pdf') on or before January 31 of each year. The annual report form shall include at a minimum the following: (1) The actual rate of mining and the remaining minable reserves which includes at a minimum the operating life of the mine, including the rate of mining and anticipated changes in that rate, and the factors used to determine the minable reserves and changes which would expand or diminish such reserves; (2) The actual mining activities including the types, amounts, sequence, and schedule for mining the material on site and stockpiling materials, including the distinctions among all aggerate resources and waste material; (3) The actual reclamation activities including the methods, sequence, and schedules of reclamation which address the goals and meets the requirements of this chapter and any conditions of the permit held on file with the Wright County Office of Planning and Zoning; and (4) The amount and type of imported aggregate and imported material brought to the property; and (5) A map which depicts the status of mining, construction, reclamation, and watershed modifications, at a scale which is normally used by the operator for the mine planning purposes, which: (a) defines the shape and extent of the aggregate material which will support the operating life of the mine; and (b) identifies all known and inferred mineral reserves or resources which are located within the mining area but which have not been included as part of the mining plan; (c) identifies lands proposed for use as vegetative reference and screening areas, depict the detailed drainage patterns for waters which may contact leachable materials; and (d) depicts at appropriate intervals, approved by the Zoning Administrator, the status of: all mining (including shape, extent, and content) and reclamation (including contouring, dust control, temporary stabilization, vegetation, and deactivation) of each: stockpile, basin, mine, drainage control, settling basin, and auxiliary facilities. (6) Failure to timely file an annual report is prima facia evidence that the gravel operation is inactive. (Ord. 18-4, passed 6-19-2018; Ord. 23-1, passed 5-2-2023) § 155.101 LAND ALTERATIONS. (A) Permit required. (1) A land alteration permit shall be required in all cases where excavation, grading and/or filling of any land within the county would result in a substantial alteration of existing ground contour or would change existing drainage or would cause flooding or erosion or would deprive an adjoining property owner of lateral support and would remove or destroy the present ground cover resulting in less beneficial cover for present and proposed development, uses and enjoyment of any property in the county. (2) (a) Substantial alteration shall be defined as the extraction, grading or filling of land involving movement of earth and materials in excess of 50 cubic yards in the shorelands districts, and in excess of 500 cubic yards in all other districts except drain tiles and ditch cleaning in agricultural areas. Such substantial alteration shall require a conditional use permit. (b) The creation of wildlife ponds, pollution control structures and erosion control structures shall not require a conditional use permit, provided that said construction is approved by an official of the Soil and Water Conservation District and abides by all other applicable rules, regulations and ordinances. (3) The extraction, grading or filling of land involving the movement of earth and materials in excess of ten cubic yards within shore, bluff impact zones or steep slopes in shoreland areas shall require an administrative permit, but not a conditional use permit. (4) Public road improvement projects, and grading and excavation directly related to such projects (not to include gravel pits), shall not require a land alteration permit; provided, the work is directly supervised by the County Engineer or the governing body of a local unit of government. (5) A land alteration permit is also required from the county and from the Commissioner of Natural Resources for any alteration in the Floodplain District and the Shorelands Districts. Such alteration shall include any filling, dredging, channeling or any other work in the beds of public waters which would change the course, current or cross-section of a public water. (6) A land alteration permit shall be valid for a period of six months from the date of issue. A land alteration permit shall be administered in the same manner as a conditional use permit. (B) Requirements. Before the issuance of a land alteration permit or an administrative land alteration permit, it must be established that all of the following conditions are met. These conditions must also be adhered to during the issuance of construction permits, permits, conditional use permits, interim use permits, variances and subdivision approvals. (1) Grading or filling in any type 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 wetland must be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following functional qualities of the wetland (this evaluation must also include a determination of whether the wetland alteration being proposed requires permits, reviews or approvals by other local, state or federal agencies such as a watershed district, the state's Department of Natural Resources or the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The applicant will be so advised): (a) Sediment and pollutant trapping and retention; (b) Storage of surface runoff to prevent or reduce flood damage; (c) Fish and wildlife habitat; (d) Recreational use; (e) Shoreline or bank stabilization; and (f) Noteworthiness, including special qualities such as historic significance, critical habitat for endangered plants and animals or others. (2) Alterations must be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest time possible. (3) Mulches or similar materials must be used, where necessary, for temporary bare soil coverage and a permanent vegetation cover must be established as soon as possible. (4) Methods to minimize soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature must be used. (5) Altered areas must be stabilized to acceptable erosion control standards consistent with the field office technical guides of the local soil and water conservation districts and the United States Soil Conservation Service. (6) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope. (7) Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by qualified professionals for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30% or greater. (8) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones. (9) Any alterations below the ordinary high water level of public waters must first be authorized by the Commissioner under M.S. §§ 103G.301 through 130G.315, as it may be amended from time to time. (10) Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted, interim, or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby properties. (11) Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, the landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level, and the height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. (C) Connections to public waters. Excavations where the intended purpose is connection to a public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons, and harbors, require a conditional use permit. Permission for excavations may be given only after the Commissioner has approved the proposed connection to public waters. (Ord. 18-4, passed 6-19-2018; Ord. 23-1, passed 5-2-2023) City Council Agenda: 7/22/24 2M. Consideration of authorizing Braun Intertec to provide geotechnical services for the construction of a water treatment plant at a total cost of $18,595 Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Public Works Director/City Engineer 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Finance Director City Administrator ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize a contract with Braun Intertec to provide geotechnical services for the construction of a water treatment plant at a total cost of $18,595. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION August 24, 2020: Authorized WSB to complete a feasibility study for the installation of a water treatment facility. June 28, 2021: Approved a resolution in support of construction of a Water Treatment Facility. December 11, 2023: Authorized AE2S to provide engineering services for the construction of a water treatment plant at a cost of $1,939,800. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The proposed geotechnical evaluation is required as part of the design and construction of a water treatment plant. It will characterize subsurface geological conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the building, pavement, and utilities. As part of the evaluation, standard penetration test borings will be performed. Two borings will be completed at a depth of 15 feet, nine borings to a depth of 45 feet, and one boring at a minimum of 10 feet into very dense soil, which is anticipated to be approximately 60 feet. Four proposals were received ranging in price from $17,805 to $74,703. Staff recommends the selection of Braun Intertec at a price of $18,595. Although they are not the overall lowest bidder, staff and AE2S, the design consultants, have more experience working with Braun Intertec and consider the extra assurance in project quality to be worth the additional cost. The geotechnical evaluation would begin within a month. The anticipated bid date for the project is expected to occur in spring 2025. City Council Agenda: 7/22/24 Budget Impact: The 2024 budget includes $1,000,000 for design services for this project. Staff Workload Impact: City staff from several departments are allocating significant time and resources to the planning and design of the water treatment plant since it is a priority project for the city. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Monticello 2040 Comprehensive Plan's Community Facility and Infrastructure chapter includes goals to equitably distribute services as well as provide a complete, well -maintained utility system; the construction of the water treatment plant is a vital part of achieving both of those goals. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommend proceeding with authorizing a contract with Braun Intertec for geotechnical services for this project. SUPPORTING DATA • Proposal Letter BRAUN I NTE RTEC The Science You Build On. June 7, 2024 Matt Leonard, PE City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Proposal for a Geotechnical Evaluation Monticello Water Treatment Plant 200 Block of Chelsea Road Monticello, Minnesota Dear Mr. Leonard: Braun Intertec Corporation Phone: 320.253.9940 3900 Roosevelt Road, Suite 113 Web: brauintertec.com Saint Cloud, MN 56301 Proposal QTB197979 Braun Intertec Corporation respectfully submits this proposal to complete a geotechnical evaluation for the proposed water treatment plant at the referenced site. Project Information Per the proposal request provided by AE2S dated May 23, 2024, we understand the proposed project will include construction of a new water treatment plant on the property located on the 200 block of Chelsea Road in Monticello, Minnesota. We construction will include a new single story treatment plant building with a basement and a 20-foot deep clearwell tank, new bituminous and concrete pavements, and associated site utilities. Purpose The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation will be to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of building, pavements, and utilities. Scope of Services We propose the following tasks to help achieve the stated purpose. If we encounter unfavorable or unforeseen conditions during the completion of our tasks that lead us to recommend an expanded scope of services, we will contact you to discuss the conditions before resuming our services. Site Access Based on aerial photographs, it appears that the site is accessible to a truck -mounted drill rig. We assume there will be no cause for delays in accessing the exploration locations. We are not including tree clearing, debris or obstruction removal, grading of navigable paths, or snow plowing. AA/EOE City of Monticello Proposal QTB197979 June 7, 2024 Page 2 Depending on access requirements, ground conditions or potential utility conflicts, our field crew may alter the exploration locations from those proposed to facilitate accessibility. Our drilling activities may also impact the vegetation and may rut the surface to access boring locations. Restoration of vegetation and turf is not part of our scope of services. Staking We understand AE2S will stake the boring locations in the field. We assume the location coordinates and ground surface elevations at the boring locations will be provided to us. Utility Clearance Prior to drilling, we will contact Gopher State One Call and arrange for notification of the appropriate utility vendors to mark and clear the exploration locations of public underground utilities. You, or your authorized representative, are responsible to notify us before we begin our work of the presence and location of any underground objects or private utilities that are not the responsibility of public agencies. Penetration Test Borings As requested, we will drill 12 standard penetration test (SPT) borings for the project. We will extend 2 borings to a depth of about 15 feet, 9 borings to a depth of 45 feet, and 1 boring a minimum of 10 feet into very dense soil, which is anticipated to be approximately 60 feet deep. We will perform standard penetration tests at 2 1/2-foot vertical intervals to a depth of about 20 feet, and at 5-foot intervals at greater depths. The figure below shows an illustration of the requested boring locations. Figure 1 Requested Boring Locations r 5 , + o yr s — .__------------ -- - ___ — I 1 --- ---- - -44 14 AL :figure provided by AE2S dated March 2024. BRAUN INTERTEC City of Monticello Proposal QTB197979 June 7, 2024 Page 3 If the intended boring depths do not extend through unsuitable material, we will extend the borings at least 5 feet into suitable material at greater depths. The additional information will help evaluate such issues as excavation depth, consolidation settlement, and foundation alternatives, among others. If we identify a need for deeper (or additional) borings, we will contact you prior to increasing our total estimated drilled footage and submit a Change Order summarizing the anticipated additional effort and the associated cost, for your review and authorization. Groundwater Measurements If the borings encounter groundwater during or immediately after drilling of each boring, we will record the observed depth on the boring logs. We will leave the boreholes open and perform groundwater level rechecks at 24-hours, until the last day drilling on the site, at which time all remaining borings will be backfilled. MDH Notification We are planning for the borings to be 25 feet or deeper. Therefore, the Minnesota Statutes requires us to both (1) submit to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) by mail a "Sealing Notification Form", and (2) submit a Sealing Record after our completion of the borings. The Sealing Notification Form requires a signature of the current property owner, or their agent, and we need to submit this to the MDH prior to our mobilization to the site. We are attaching a copy of the Sealing Notification Form at the end of this proposal for your signature. Our proposal includes the fees for the MDH Sealing Notification and the Sealing Record. Borehole Abandonment We will backfill our exploration locations immediately after completing the drilling at each location. Minnesota Statutes require sealing temporary borings that are 15 feet deep or deeper. Based on our proposed subsurface characterization depths, we will seal 465 linear feet of borehole with grout. Sealing boreholes with grout will prevent us from disposing of auger boring cuttings in the completed boreholes. Unless you direct us otherwise, we intend to thin -spread the cuttings around the boreholes. If we cannot thin -spread cuttings, we will put them in a container left on site. We can provide off -site disposal of the cuttings for an additional fee. Overtime, subsidence of borehole backfill may occur, requiring releveling of surface grades or replacing bituminous or concrete patches. We are not assuming responsibility for re -leveling or re -patching after we complete our fieldwork. Sample Review and Laboratory Testing We will return recovered samples to our laboratory, where a geotechnical engineer will visually classify and log them. We anticipate the soils on site will be cohesionless and have estimated our cost accordingly. To help classify the materials encountered and estimate the engineering properties necessary to our analyses, we anticipate performing 6 moisture content tests and 6 mechanical analyses (through a #200 sieve only). We will adjust the actual number and type of tests based on the results of our borings. BRAUN INTERTEC City of Monticello Proposal QTB197979 June 7, 2024 Page 4 Engineering Analyses We will use data obtained from the subsurface exploration and laboratory tests to evaluate the subsurface profile and groundwater conditions, and to perform engineering analyses related to structure and pavement design and performance. Report We will prepare a report including: ■ A sketch showing the exploration locations. ■ Logs of the borings describing the materials encountered and presenting the results of our groundwater measurements and laboratory tests. ■ A summary of the subsurface profile and groundwater conditions. ■ Discussion identifying the subsurface conditions that will impact design and construction. ■ Discussion regarding the reuse of on -site materials during construction. ■ Recommendations for preparing structure and pavement subgrades, and the selection, placement and compaction of fill. ■ Recommendations for lateral earth pressure values. ■ Recommendations for the design and construction of spread footing foundation and grade supported slabs. ■ Recommendations for bituminous and concrete pavement thicknesses. We will only submit an electronic copy of our report to you unless you request otherwise. At your request, we can also send the report to additional project team members. Schedule We anticipate performing our work according to the following schedule. ■ Drill rig mobilization — within about 1 to 2 weeks following receipt of written authorization ■ Field exploration — 4 days on site to complete the work ■ Classification and laboratory testing — within 1 to 2 weeks after completion of field exploration ■ Preliminary results — within about 1 week after completion of field exploration ■ Final report submittal — within about 2 to 3 weeks after completion of field exploration BRAUN INTERTEC City of Monticello Proposal QTB197979 June 7, 2024 Page 5 If we cannot complete our proposed scope of services according to this schedule due to circumstances beyond our control, we may need to revise this proposal prior to completing the remaining tasks. Fees We will furnish the services described in this proposal on a time and materials basis for an estimated fee of $18,595. We are attaching a tabulation showing hourly and/or unit rates associated with our proposed scope of services. Please note that our drilling/field services were budgeted to occur within our normal work hours of 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If conditions occur that require us to work outside of these hours, we will request additional fees to cover our additional overtime costs. Our work may extend over several invoicing periods. As such, we will submit partial progress invoices for work we perform during each invoicing period. General Remarks We will be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed scope of services further and clarify the various scope components. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you. Please sign and return a copy to us in its entirety. We based the proposed fee on the scope of services described and the assumptions that you will authorize our services within 30 days and that others will not delay us beyond our proposed schedule. BRAUN INTERTEC City of Monticello Proposal QTB197979 June 7, 2024 Page 6 We include the Braun Intertec General Conditions, which provide additional terms and are a part of our agreement. To have questions answered or schedule a time to meet and discuss our approach to this project further, please contact Andrew Hillerud at 218.260.0930 (ahillerud@brauninterte.com). Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Andrew J. Hillerud, PE Project Engineer Steven A. Thayer, PE Senior Manager, Senior Engineer Attachments: Project Proposal MDH Notification Form General Conditions (1/1/18) c: Lane Volkmann, AE2S Aaron Vollmer, PE, AE2S The proposal is accepted, and you are authorized to proceed. Authorizer's Firm Authorizer's Signature Authorizer's Name (please print or type) Authorizer's Title Date BRAUN INTERTEC B RAU N I NTE RTEC The Science You Build On. Client: City of Monticello Matt Leonard 505 Walnut St Ste 1 Monticello, MN 55362 (763)271-3205 Project Proposal QTB197979 Monticello Water Treatment Plant Work Site Address: 200 Block of Chelsea Rd Monticello, MN 55362 Service Description: Geotechnical Evaluation Description Quantity Units Unit Price Extension Phase 1 Geotechnical Evaluation Activity 1.1 Utility Clearance - CADD $305.00 205 Utility clearance 1.00 Hour 125.00 $125.00 371 CADD/Graphics Operator 1.50 Hour 120.00 $180.00 Activity 1.2 Drilling Services $14,230.00 9000 Truck Mounted Drilling Services, per hour 38.00 Each 350.00 $13,300.00 9730 Grout with bentonite, materials per foot 465.00 Each 2.00 $930.00 1022 Thin -walled sample tubes (ASTM D 15 87), each Each 30.00 $.00 Activity 1.3 Geotechnical Soil Tests $420.00 1166 Loss by Washing Through #200 Sieve, per sample 6.00 Each 60.00 $360.00 1152 Moisture content, per sample 6.00 Each 10.00 $60.00 1156 Atterberg Limits LL and PL, Single -Point, per sample Each 110.00 $.00 1162 Sieve Analysis with 200 wash, per sample Each 130.00 $.00 1186 Unconfined Compression, per sample Each 110.00 $.00 1198 Consolidation testing, time -rate, ASTM D2435, per sample Each 700.00 $.00 1154 Density of Soil Specimens, per sample Each 35.00 $.00 Activity 1.4 Evaluation/Analysis/Reports $3,640.00 138 Project Assistant 3.00 Hour 90.00 $270.00 126 Project Engineer 14.00 Hour 175.00 $2,450.00 128 Senior Engineer 4.00 Hour 195.00 $780.00 125 Project Manager 1.00 Hour 140.00 $140.00 Phase 1 Total: $18,595.00 Proposal Total] $18,595.00 06/07/2024 10:20 AM Page 1 of 1 BRAUN I NTE RTEC The Science You Build On. June 7, 2024 Matt Leonard, PE City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Proposal for a Geotechnical Evaluation Monticello Water Treatment Plant 200 Block of Chelsea Road Monticello, Minnesota Dear Mr. Leonard: Braun Intertec Corporation Phone: 320.253.9940 3900 Roosevelt Road, Suite 113 Web: brauintertec.com Saint Cloud, MN 56301 Proposal QTB197979 Please have the property owner, representative or agent complete the "Well Owner" section only of the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Well Sealing Notification form below and return it to Braun Intertec along with the signed proposal. We will complete the remainder of the form and submit it to the MDH. NOTE: This form must be completed and returned to Braun Intertec prior to us scheduling the mobilization of our equipment and crews to the project site. WELL SEALING NOTIFICATION -WELL SEALINIai i. • .;i t � IS VALID FOR 18 MONTHS Minnesota Unique Well No. or W-series No. Send notification form and payment (check, money order, or credit card information) to: (Leave blank it not known) Minnesota Well and Boring Sealing No. Minnesota Department of Health, Well Management Section, P.O. Box 64502, St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0502. H ATTN: CASHIER — — -- - — - — _ - - ' Well Management Section Fax Number: (651) 201-4599. Card Type: ❑Visa ❑Mastercard ❑Discover Exp. Date ❑ Well Sealing Notification (269) Check Box If: Print Cardholder Name Well is Multiple Cased 3-Digit Security Code Check Well Type: Larger than 8-inch Inside Diameter Card Number (Printed on back side of card.t_ _ ❑ i Water -Supply Well l Monitoring Well I I Other Authorized Signature County Township Name Township No. Range No. Section No. (Fraction (sm. -+ Ig.) i I+ y. w WELL LOCATION Well Location Address 'Zity IStA lZip Code IEst. Depth lCasing Diameter WELL Well Owner Street Address OWNER Owner Daytime Telephone Number City State Zip Code Date WELL vvo r �� oaten Pay .a e t r rt o row „oP. y arm o Caro Na y �o �o . CONTRACTOR Failure 1.. 1. , entification and fee prior to the beginning of well sealing is a violation of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 1031, and may result in the assessment of an administrative penalty. Notification is not required to seal a boring. AA/EOE General Conditions BRAUN INTERTEC Section 1: Agreement 1.1 Our agreement with you consists of these General Conditions and the accompanying written proposal or authorization ("Agreement"). This Agreement is the entire agreement between you and us. It supersedes prior agreements. It may be modified only in a writing signed by us, making specific reference to the provision modified. 1.2 The words "you," "we," "us," and "our" include officers, employees, and subcontractors. 1.3 In the event you use a purchase order or other documentation to authorize our scope of work ("Services"), any conflicting or additional terms are not part of this Agreement. Directing us to start work prior to execution of this Agreement constitutes your acceptance. If, however, mutually acceptable terms cannot be established, we have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability to you or others, and you will compensate us for fees earned and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. Section 2: Our Responsibilities 2.1 We will provide Services specifically described in this Agreement. You agree that we are not responsible for services that are not expressly included in this Agreement. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, our findings, opinions, and recommendations will be provided to you in writing. You agree not to rely on oral findings, opinions, or recommendations without our written approval. 2.2 In performing our professional services, we will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of our profession practicing in the same locality. If you direct us to deviate from our recommended procedures, you agree to hold us harmless from claims, damages, and expenses arising out of your direction. If during the one year period following completion of Services it is determined that the above standards have not been met and you have promptly notified us in writing of such failure, we will perform, at our cost, such corrective services as may be necessary, within the original scope in this Agreement, to remedy such deficiency. Remedies set forth in this section constitute your sole and exclusive recourse with respect to the performance or quality of Services. 2.3 We will reference our field observations and sampling to available reference points, but we will not survey, set, or check the accuracy of those points unless we accept that duty in writing. Locations of field observations or sampling described in our report or shown on our sketches are based on information provided by others or estimates made by our personnel. You agree that such dimensions, depths, or elevations are approximations unless specifically stated otherwise in the report. You accept the inherent risk that samples or observations may not be representative of things not sampled or seen and further that site conditions may vary over distance or change over time. 2.4 Our duties do not include supervising or directing your representatives or contractors or commenting on, overseeing, or providing the means and methods of their services unless expressly set forth in this Agreement. We will not be responsible for the failure of your contractors, and the providing of Services will not relieve others of their responsibilities to you or to others 2.5 We will provide a health and safety program for our employees, but we will not be responsible for contractor, owner, project, or site health or safety. 2.6 You will provide, at no cost to us, appropriate site safety measures as to work areas to be observed or inspected by us. Our employees are authorized by you to refuse to work under conditions that may be unsafe. 2.7 Unless a fixed fee is indicated, our price is an estimate of our project costs and expenses based on information available to us and our experience and knowledge. Such estimates are an exercise of our professional judgment and are not guaranteed or warranted. Actual costs may vary. You should allow a contingency in addition to estimated costs. Section 3: Your Responsibilities 3.1 You will provide us with prior environmental, geotechnical and other reports, specifications, plans, and information to which you have access about the site. You agree to provide us with all plans, changes in plans, and new information as to site conditions until we have completed Services. 3.2 You will provide access to the site. In the performance of Services some site damage is normal even when due care is exercised. We will use reasonable care to minimize damage to the site. We have not included the cost of restoration of damage in the estimated charges. 3.3 You agree to provide us, in a timely manner, with information that you have regarding buried objects at the site. We will not be responsible for locating buried objects at the site. You agree to hold us harmless, defend, and indemnify us from claims, damages, losses, penalties and expenses (including attorney fees) involving buried objects that were not properly marked or identified or of which you had knowledge but did not timely call to our attention or correctly show on the plans you or others furnished to us. 3.4 You will notify us of any knowledge or suspicion of the presence of hazardous or dangerous materials present on any work site or in a sample provided to us. You agree to provide us with information in your possession or control relating to such materials or samples. If we observe or suspect the presence of contaminants not anticipated in this Agreement, we may terminate Services without liability to you or to others, and you will compensate us for fees earned and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 3.5 Neither this Agreement nor the providing of Services will operate to make us an owner, operator, generator, transporter, treater, storer, or a disposal facility within the meaning of the Resource Conservation Recovery Act, as amended, or within the meaning of any other law governing the handling, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous substances. You agree to hold us harmless, defend, and indemnify us from any damages, claims, damages, penalties or losses resulting from the storage, removal, hauling or disposal of such substances. 3.6 Monitoring wells are your property, and you are responsible for their permitting, maintenance, and abandonment unless expressly set forth otherwise in this Agreement. 3.7 You agree to make all disclosures required by law. In the event you do not own the project site, you acknowledge that it is your duty to inform the owner of the discovery or release of contaminants at the site. You agree to hold us harmless, defend, and indemnify us from claims, damages, penalties, or losses and expenses, including attorney fees, related to failures to make disclosures, disclosures made by us that are required by law, and from claims related to the informing or failure to inform the site owner of the discovery of contaminants. Section 4: Reports and Records 4.1 Unless you request otherwise, we will provide our report in an electronic format. 4.2 Our reports, notes, calculations, and other documents and our computer software and data are instruments of our service to you, and they remain our property. We hereby grant you a license to use the reports and related information we provide only for the related project and for the purposes disclosed to us. You may not transfer our reports to others or use them for a purpose for which they were not prepared without our written approval. You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold us harmless from claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney fees, arising out of such a transfer or use. 4.3 If you do not pay for Services in full as agreed, we may retain work not yet delivered to you and you agree to return to us all of our work that is in your possession or under your control. 4.4 Samples and field data remaining after tests are conducted and field and laboratory equipment that cannot be adequately cleansed of contaminants are and continue to be your property. They may be discarded or returned to you, at our discretion, unless within 15 days of the report date you give us written direction to store or transfer the materials at your expense. 4.5 Electronic data, reports, photographs, samples, and other materials provided by you or others may be discarded or returned to you, at our discretion, unless within 15 days of the report date you give us written direction to store or transfer the materials at your expense. GC Page 1 of 2 Section 5: Compensation 5.1 You will pay for Services as stated in this Agreement. If such payment references our Schedule of Charges, the invoicing will be based upon the most current schedule. An estimated amount is not a firm figure. You agree to pay all sales taxes and other taxes based on your payment of our compensation. Our performance is subject to credit approval and payment of any specified retainer. 5.2 You will notify us of billing disputes within 15 days. You will pay undisputed portions of invoices upon receipt. You agree to pay interest on unpaid balances beginning 30 days after invoice dates at the rate of 1.5% per month, or at the maximum rate allowed by law. 5.3 If you direct us to invoice a third party, we may do so, but you agree to be responsible for our compensation unless the third party is creditworthy (in our sole opinion) and provides written acceptance of all terms of this Agreement. 5.4 Your obligation to pay for Services under this Agreement is not contingent on your ability to obtain financing, governmental or regulatory agency approval, permits, final adjudication of any lawsuit, your successful completion of any project, receipt of payment from a third party, or any other event. No retainage will be withheld. 5.5 If you do not pay us in accordance with this Agreement, you agree to reimburse all costs and expenses for collection of the moneys invoiced, including but not limited to attorney fees and staff time. 5.6 You agree to compensate us in accordance with our Schedule of Charges if we are asked or required to respond to legal process arising out of a proceeding related to the project and as to which we are not a party. 5.7 If we are delayed by factors beyond our control, or if project conditions or the scope or amount of work changes, or if changed labor conditions result in increased costs, decreased efficiency, or delays, or if the standards or methods change, we will give you timely notice, the schedule will be extended for each day of delay, and we will be compensated for costs and expenses incurred in accordance with our Schedule of Charges. 5.8 If you fail to pay us in accordance with this Agreement, we may consider the default a total breach of this Agreement and, at our option, terminate our duties without liability to you or to others, and you will compensate us for fees earned and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 5.9 In consideration of our providing insurance to cover claims made by you, you hereby waive any right to offset fees otherwise due us. Section 6: Disputes, Damage, and Risk Allocation 6.1 Each of us will exercise good faith efforts to resolve disputes without litigation. Such efforts will include, but not be limited to, a meeting(s) attended by each party's representative(s) empowered to resolve the dispute. Before either of us commences an action against the other, disputes (except collections) will be submitted to mediation. 6.2 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement neither party hereto shall be responsible or held liable to the other for punitive, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, or liability for loss of use, loss of business opportunity, loss of profit or revenue, loss of product or output, or business interruption. 6.3 You and we agree that any action in relation to an alleged breach of our standard of care or this Agreement shall be commenced within one year of the date of the breach or of the date of substantial completion of Services, whichever is earlier, without regard to the date the breach is discovered. Any action not brought within that one year time period shall be barred, without regard to any other limitations period set forth by law or statute. We will not be liable unless you have notified us within 30 days of the date of such breach and unless you have given us an opportunity to investigate and to recommend ways of mitigating damages. You agree not to make a claim against us unless you have provided us at least 30 days prior to the institution of any legal proceeding against us with a written certificate executed by an appropriately licensed professional specifying and certifying each and every act or omission that you contend constitutes a violation of the standard of care governing our professional services. Should you fail to meet the conditions above, you agree to fully release us from any liability for such allegation. 6.4 For you to obtain the benefit of a fee which includes a reasonable allowance for risks, you agree that our aggregate liability for all claims will not exceed the fee paid for Services or $50,000, whichever is greater. If you are unwilling to accept this allocation of risk, we will increase our aggregate liability to $100,000 provided that within 10 days of the date of this Agreement, you provide payment in an amount that will increase our fees by 10% but not less than $500, to compensate us for the greater risk undertaken. This increased fee is not the purchase ofinsurance. 6.5 You agree to indemnify us from all liability to others in excess of the risk allocation stated herein and to insure this obligation. In addition, all indemnities and limitations of liability set forth in this Agreement apply however the same may arise, whether in contract, tort statute, equity or other theory of law, including, but not limited to, the breach of any legal duty or the fault, negligence, or strict liability of either party. 6.6 This Agreement shall be governed, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state in which our servicing office is located, without regard to its conflict of laws rules. The laws of the state of our servicing office will govern all disputes, and all claims shall be heard in the state or federal courts for that state. Each of us waives trial by jury. 6.7 No officer or employee acting within the scope of employment shall have individual liability for his or her acts or omissions, and you agree not to make a claim against individual officers or employees. Section 7: General Indemnification 7.1 We will indemnify and hold you harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by our negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom we are legally responsible. You will indemnify and hold us harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by your negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom you are legally responsible. 7.2 To the extent it maybe necessary to indemnify either of us under Section 7.1, you and we expressly waive, in favor of the other only, any immunity or exemption from liability that exists under any worker compensation law. 7.3 You agree to indemnify us against losses and costs arising out of claims of patent or copyright infringement as to any process or system that is specified or selected by you or by others on your behalf. Section 8: Miscellaneous Provisions 8.1 We will provide a certificate of insurance to you upon request. Any claim as an Additional Insured shall be limited to losses caused by our negligence. 8.2 You and we, for ourselves and our insurers, waive all claims and rights of subrogation for losses arising out of causes of loss covered by our respective insurance policies. 8.3 Neither of us will assign or transfer any interest, any claim, any cause of action, or any right against the other. Neither of us will assign or otherwise transfer or encumber any proceeds or expected proceeds or compensation from the project or project claims to any third person, whether directly or as collateral or otherwise. 8.4 This Agreement maybe terminated early only in writing. You will compensate us for fees earned for performance completed and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 8.5 If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, then such provision will be modified to reflect the parties' intention. All remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 8.6 No waiver of any right or privilege of either party will occur upon such party's failure to insist on performance of any term, condition, or instruction, or failure to exercise any right or privilege or its waiver of any breach. GC Revised 1/1/2018 Page 2 of 2 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2N. Consideration of authorizing impact studies and the approval of an escrow agreement with Frattalone Companies, Inc. Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Public Works Director/City Engineer 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Finance Director, Community City Administrator Development Director ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize staff to enter into agreements with AE2S and Bolton and Menk, Inc. for the development of utility impact studies and the approval of an escrow agreement with Frattalone Companies, Inc. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND In 2022 the City completed a feasibility study for the construction of a water treatment plant. This study looked at the City's current water use and based on the growth rates identified in the Comprehensive Plan identified projected a 50-year water demand projection. In 2022 the 5- year average daily water demand was 1.47 million gallons per day (MGD) with a 5-year maximum daily demand of 3.46 MGD. This study projected that in 2070 the average daily demand would be 3.30 MGD with a maximum daily demand of 8.26 MGD. At the same time, the City updated the Wastewater Facility Plan. This study looked at current loadings and flows at the wastewater treatment plant and projected out 20-year design flows. In 2021 the wastewater treatment plant saw an average of 1.17 MGD of inflows with an average maximum daily demand of 1.42 MGD. This study estimated the 20-year average wet weather design flow at 1.92 MGD. The existing facility has a design capacity of 2.36 MGD. Both of these studies also evaluated the water and wastewater trunk utility systems, providing analysis on design and capacity needs for the City's growth areas based on the 2040 Vision + Plan. Recently, the City was approached by private entities interested in developing in our community. The proposed use would impact the City's water and wastewater systems, including both the water treatment facility currently being designed and the existing wastewater treatment facility. Initial requests indicate up to 5 MGD of potable water with up to 3 MGD being discharged to the wastewater treatment plant. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 The utility needs of potential projects would drastically impact the growth projections that were assumed in these studies as well as the trunk utilities planned for future growth. To better understand the impacts of potential development, staff proposes to expand the studies completed in 2022 by looking at some of the following items: • Review current permitting with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for our wastewater treatment plant discharge and understand potential permitting impacts for future growth. • Review current permitting with the MN Department of Natural Resources for water use appropriations and potential impacts for future growth and aquifers. • Study potential impacts and costs for expanding the wastewater treatment plant for accommodating this user while maintaining the ability to accommodate future growth. • Study potential impacts and costs for expanding the planned water treatment plant project for accommodating this user while maintaining the ability to accommodate future growth. • Review the water collection and sewer collection systems to understand potential impacts to the systems while accommodating future growth. • Project operational costs associated with the increased supply and treatment of water and sewer for this user. These studies would provide a list of projected capital improvements necessary and associated permits required so the impacts on the existing and future rate payers can be fully understood. Because these impacts are only being studied because of a private entity's interest in development, the entity agreed to enter into an escrow agreement to cover the cost of these studies to better understand the impacts of this potential large utility user. AE2S is currently working on the design of the water treatment plant, and staff proposes that they look at the potential impacts to the water treatment plant design and the impacts to the water distribution system. Bolton and Menk, Inc. recently completed the facility plan for the wastewater treatment plant as well as the study for the sewer collection system, and staff proposes they look at the potential impacts to the wastewater treatment plant and was as the sewer collection systems. The estimated cost of all the studies is estimated at $50,000. It is anticipated that the studies would be complete by the end of August, and the findings would be presented to the City Council following their completion. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 Budget Impact: The costs for these studies would be paid by an escrow agreement with the developer. II. Staff Workload Impact: City staff will act as liaison between the consultant engineers (AE2S and Bolton and Menk) and the private entity and will provide community -wide perspective throughout the project. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Monticello 2040 Plan's Community Facilities and Infrastructure Plan states "A complete and well -maintained utility system providing service to all residents and extended into the Orderly Annexation Area only when development occurs, pays for the extensions and the development site is incorporated into the city boundaries." The initial escrow agreement for the study completion is consistent with this goal. The resulting studies will also provide impact and cost information for the City's use in managing development consistent with this goal. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of an escrow agreement and the completion of utility studies for this potential development. The proposed studies will provide information on the potential utility impact of the proposed development use and supporting a further understanding of the cost implications. The information from the studies will serve as a platform for informed planning and decision -making. SUPPORTING DATA • Draft Escrow Agreement ESCROW AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 2010, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Frattalone Companies("Developer"). RECITALS A. Developer has proposed development of land situated near the City and located in Section 23, Township 121, Range 024 (the "Project Site") as more fully shown and described on Exhibit A hereto; B. The City is asked to perform a preliminary review for a plan for development which includes the utilities and other site improvements for the Project Site. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. DEPOSIT OF ESCROW FUNDS. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Escrow Account, the Developer shall deposit $50,000with the City. All accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to the City to reimburse the City for its cost in administering the escrow account. 2. rURPOSE OF ESCROW. The purpose of the escrow is to secure City expenses related to the preliminary review of the plans and to determine the utility impacts of the development for the Project Site. The Developer shall pay all actual documented costs in excess of the deposit incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development for City administration, legal, engineering and planning expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the development and preparation of this Contract. 3. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT. If the Escrow amount falls below $5,000 the Developer shall deposit additional sums as directed by the City or the City may halt all work on the Project Site review. 4. CLOSING ESCROW. The Balance on deposit in the escrow, if any, shall be returned to the Developer when the review has been completed. 5. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, draw from the escrow account without further approval of the Developer to reimburse the City for eligible expenses the City has incurred, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court 133513v01 JJJ:08/16/2007 order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 5. LIEN FOR DEFICIENCIES. If the project is abandoned by Developer or if the eligible expenses incurred by the City exceed the amount in escrow, the City shall have the right to place a lien for governmental services against the property pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 514.67. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF MONTICELLO BY: Its Mayor BY: Its City Administrator DEVELOPER: BY: Its: OWNER(S) OF PROPERTY: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by and by respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal 133513v01 2 JJJ:08/16/2007 corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20, by the NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2010, by , the fee owner(s). NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ day of of the Developer. day of , 133513v01 3 JJJ:08/16/2007 EXHIBIT "A" TO ESCROW AGREEMENT 133513v01 JJJ:08/16/2007 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 20. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-64 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $54,724.96 to Automatic Systems, Inc. for the 2021 SCADA Improvements proiect Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Public Works Director/City Engineer 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Finance Director City Administrator ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt resolution 2024-64 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $54,724.96 to Automatic Systems, Inc. for the 2021 SCADA Improvements project. PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION June 8, 2021: City Council adopted resolution 2021-43 accepting bids and awarding contract to Automatic Systems, Inc. for the 2021 SCADA Improvements Project for the Base Bid and Bid Alternate A, City Project No 19C003 for a total amount of $971,974. November 8, 2021: City Council approved a change order for the 2021 SCADA Improvements project in the amount of $39,063.75 for additional floats at the lift stations and the for the installation of a new automatic transfer switch at Well #5. January 24, 2022: City Council approved a change order in the amount $75,337 for additional security upgrades. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City of Monticello's supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems provide control and monitoring of the City's water and wastewater assets. As noted previously, the proposed improvements to the SCADA system provide necessary replacements and updates, standardize systems, and enhance the overall system for greater efficiency. This project replaced the SCADA systems for the water and sewer utilities including the Wastewater treatment plant and included some of the following improvements: • Replaced equipment that was at end -of -life. • Replaced obsolete hardware and software. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 • Improved monitoring of sanitary sewer lift stations to include real-time operating status and historical trending. • Installed programmable logic controllers (PLCs) at the sanitary sewer lift stations. • Improved information available to the operators, including graphic displays of all infrastructure, trending capability, and report generation. • Improved after-hours system monitoring, including remote access to SCADA using smartphones/tablets. The following paperwork was recently submitted by the contractor for final payment to be released: 1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC134 forms). 2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. I. Budget Impact: The total construction cost was $1,094,499, which was paid from the Water and Sewer funds, including a grant from Wright County's American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocation. II. Staff Impact: N/A III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommend accepting the improvements and issuing the final payment. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution B. Recommendation letter CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-64 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT OF $54,724.96 TO AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE 2021 SCADA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to a contract with the City of Monticello, Automatic Systems, Inc. was awarded, on June 8, 2021, for the 2021 SCADA Improvement Project for the Base Bid and Bid Alternate A, City Project 19C003; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved and that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract subject to receipt of the following: 1) Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC 134); 2) Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers); 3) Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 22" d day of July, 2024. CITY OF MONTICELLO Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk &(2#/$ #2(# $(#23'#&4$5 6(#2 5 /) )7/ 8&. ) 9:;89 8:;; DESIGN *TREE engineering + land surveying '/01 )*+,+&*-,./*&$*+&0-1 %0*+-$ ! " ! !# $!#%! "(�# "2#2!3 !+0#&1 2&3+ &-5#!++ !+!6# !+!6# & + !&++l+ #& V 89:92 i ! 6 *+, *-$+. ,/,+0*-* 12 r #„„$% # " # &*! * *_ Q * * ,ill$11 **/0! $& * I I" 23!"45* $- /02 5 " 1$!-* * ** a r t$%%,,,,,,% !,AUTOMATIC V SYSTEMS CO. CONDITIONAL LIEN WAIVER UPON PARTIAL PAYMENT Upon receipt by the undersigned of a check from the City of Monticello, MN in the sum of Fifty Four Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty_ Four Dollars and 96/ 100 ($54,724.96) payable to Automatic Systems Company and when the check has been properly endorsed and has been paid by the bank upon which it is drawn, this document shall become effective to release any mechanic's lien, stop notice, or bond right the undersigned has on the job of: Monticello, MN 2021 SCADA Improvements Proiect 1022001 (ASC 20210702) Owned by: City of Monticello, MN This release covers partial payment to the undersigned for labor, services, equipment, or material furnished on the job. Before any recipient of this document relies on it, the party should verify evidence of payment to the undersigned. Given under my hand and seal this 25th Day of June 2024. AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY By: J .�„► Travis�l�✓�oran , President Subscribed and sworn efore me this 25th Day of June 2024. it I Signature: Stamp: SARA M BATHIE z . Commission Number 189150 My Commission Expires 'OM/ March 30, 2027 Branch Office Corporate Office Branch Office • 515.232.4770 • 651.631.9005 • 308.940.0649 2740 Ford St. 2400 W County Rd. D Grand Island, NE Ames, IA 50010 St. Paul, MN 55112 !,AUTOMATIC V SYSTEMS CO. CONDITIONAL LIEN WAIVER UPON PARTIAL PAYMENT Upon receipt by the undersigned of a check from the City of Monticello, MN in the sum of Fifty Four Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty_ Four Dollars and 96/100 ($54,724.96) payable to Automatic Systems Company and when the check has been properly endorsed and has been paid by the bank upon which it is drawn, this document shall become effective to release any mechanic's lien, stop notice, or bond right the undersigned has on the job of: Monticello, MN 2021 SCADA Improvements Proiect 1022001 (ASC 20210702) Owned by: City of Monticello, MN This release covers partial payment to the undersigned for labor, services, equipment, or material furnished on the job. Before any recipient of this document relies on it, the party should verify evidence of payment to the undersigned. Given under my hand and seal this 25th Day of June 2024. AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY By: Travis�l�►�oran , President Subscribed and sworn efore me this 25th Day of June 2024. g I Signature: Stamp: SARA M BATHIE x r Commission Number 189150 My commission Expires low ' March 30, 2027 0Branch Office Corporate Office Branch Office 515.232.4770 • 651.631.9005 • 308.940.0649 2740 Ford St. 2400 W County Rd. D Grand Island, NE Ames, IA 50010 St. Paul, MN 55112 'DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer ID: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted: Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: Minnesota ID: Project Owner: Project Number: Project Begin Date: Project End Date: Project Location: Project Amount: Subcontractor Summary 63361024 2455373 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN 1022001 30-Jun-2021 28-Dec-2023 MONTICELLO, MN $1,094,499.15 Name ID Affidavit Number KILLMER ELECTRIC 6718331 1251135488 0-548-996-960 12-Jun-2024 10:25:06 AM AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO 42-1324422 Automatic Systems Contractor Affidavit Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll -free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. DEPARTMENT F REVENUE Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer ID: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted: Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: Minnesota ID: Project Owner: Project Number: Project Begin Date: Project End Date: Project Location: Project Amount: Subcontractors: 1251135488 6718331 CITY OF MONTICELLO 1022001 30-Jun-2021 28-Dec-2023 MONTICELLO, MN $206,374.16 No Subcontractors 0-910-531-424 16-May-2024 3:42:26 PM KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC 41-1250710 cresner Contractor Affidavit Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll -free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2P. Consideration of approving the purchase of right-of-wav for the School Boulevard Intersection Improvements Proiect and authorizing the Finance Director to make pavment of such claims Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Public Works Director/City Engineer 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Finance Director City Administrator ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the purchase of permanent and temporary easements from the following parcels: PID 155148001010 in the amount of $35,000, PID 155207001010 in the amount of $8,300, and PID 155207001020 in the amount of $2,000. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION July 10, 2023: Authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the School Boulevard Intersection Improvements Project and approved a contract with Hakanson Anderson to provide engineering in the amount of $235,500. May 13, 2024: Authorized the purchase of permanent and temporary easements for the Edmonson and School Boulevard Roundabout. July 8, 2024: Approved the submission of a Public Interest Finding with MNDOT for the School Boulevard Intersection Improvements Project. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND There are two roundabouts planned along School Boulevard: one at the intersection of Edmonson Avenue and the other at the intersection of Cedar Street. Both intersections are currently controlled with 4-way stop signs, and the traffic analysis completed for The Pointes at Cedar Master Plan recommended constructing roundabouts for greater safety and efficiency. To facilitate construction, the City sought grants for critical funding support, and received a grant for each roundabout: School Boulevard and Edmonson Avenue • Carbon Reduction Program (CRP) Grant • $485,000 • Required MnDOT to authorize construction by June 20, 2024, which has occurred. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 ➢ School Boulevard and Cedar Street Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) • $1,000,000 (Fiscal Year 2027) Given that these two projects are so close in proximity, staff proposed they be constructed together in 2025. The current engineering services contract with Hakanson Anderson is based on a single project constructing both roundabouts. For the construction of the roundabouts, temporary and permanent right-of-way easements are needed at both intersections from a total of seven parcels. Appraisals were received for all seven parcels, and the consultant and City staff reviewed the information and negotiated with all parcel owners. The four acquisitions required for the Edmonson Avenue and School Boulevard roundabout were approved at the City Council meeting on May 13, 2024. Staff is now bringing forward a recommendation to approve the purchase of the required easements for the Cedar Street and School Boulevard roundabout. The purchase amounts following negotiations are as follows: PID 155207001010 agreed to the appraised price of $8,000. PID 155207001020 agreed to a price of $2,000 which is slightly more than the appraised amount of $1,100. Y PID 155148001010 agreed to a price of $35,000 which is more than the updated appraised amount of $22,300. This negotiated price is 20% more than the current assessed value of the land which is currently $14.12 per square foot. The project is scheduled to be bid this winter with construction starting in the spring of 2025. MnDOT is currently reviewing the final plan for approval and once all the acquisition documents are signed, MnDOT is expected to provide approval to move forward with the project. The scope of improvements includes the following: • Replacement of the current all -way stop controlled intersection at School Boulevard and Cedar Street with a single lane roundabout. • Replacement of the current all -way stop controlled intersection at School Boulevard and Edmonson Avenue with a single lane roundabout. • Full depth reclamation of School Boulevard between Highway 25 and Country Lane. • Full depth reclamation as required for Cedar Street and Edmonson Avenue for roundabout construction. • Construction of approximately 600 feet of 10-foot-wide bituminous trail along the south side of School Boulevard between Edmonson Avenue and Country Lane. • Removal of the center medians between Cedar Street and Edmonson Avenue on School Boulevard and construction of a two-way left turn lane. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 • Replacement of all non -compliant ADA ramps throughout the project area and installation of new ADA ramps and sidewalk as required for the roundabout construction. • Installation of pathway lights where new pathways are added to connect to existing lighting system. • Replacement of street trees removed for the pathways and addition of irrigation for tree watering. • Installation of roundabout landscaping consistent with the Pointes at Cedar Zoning district. Budget Impact: The total project costs are estimated at $3,184,655, including engineering, right-of-way acquisition, construction, legal services, and contingency. Of these costs, $1,485,000 will be paid by federal grant funds and $483,170 is proposed to be assessed. The local costs are anticipated to be $907,132 paid by the Capital Projects funds and $309,363 to be paid by the Street Lighting Improvement Fund. The 2024 Capital Projects Fund budget includes $2,495,000; the 2025 Capital Projects Fund budget will include any remaining costs for the project since this is now anticipated to be a multi -year project. The right-of-way acquisition costs proposed with this item would be paid through the funds budgeted in 2024. II. Staff Workload Impact: In addition to consultant time, engineering staff have contributed approximately 30 hours to negotiating the right-of-way acquisitions at School Boulevard and Cedar Street. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Pointes at Cedar Master Plan is an adopted appendix to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Comprehensive Plan; the document calls for both roundabouts to improve safety and efficiency along the collector roadway of School Boulevard. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommend approval of the purchase of right-of-way for these three parcels and authorizing the Finance Director to make the related payments to facilitate the approvals necessary to maintain the project timeline and grant funding. SUPPORTING DATA • Offer letters Hakanson Anderson April 5, 2024 S.B. 24 LLC Atten: Michael Krutzig 9234 State Hwy 25 NE Monticello, MN 55362 Main Office: 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763/427-5860 www.haa-inc.com Re: City of Monticello School Boulevard Improvements Dear Mr. Krutzig: 45 4 This is a follow-up to our March 22, 2024 letter regarding the School Boulevard Improvement Project in Monticello, Minnesota. As discussed in our previous letter, the City of Monticello plans to reconstruct the intersections at School Boulevard and Cedar Street and School Boulevard and Edmonson Avenue. The four-way all stops will be replaced with roundabouts. As part of the project, the City will be requesting some new temporary and permanent easement on your property as shown on the attached Exhibit. Attached is the Appraisal Report prepared by Nagell Appraisal, Inc. The City is requesting your consideration of the appraised value of the easements as summarized in the report. The appraised value is $21,300. If you have any questions, please call or email Matt Leonard, the City's Public Works Director, at 763- 271-3271 (matt.leonard(&ci.monticello.mn.us) or me at 763-852-0485 (CraiaJ(&haa-inc.com). Alternatively, you can contact the appraiser, Ethan Waytas, directly at: Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 12805 Highway 55 #300 Plymouth, MN 55441 952-544-8966 952-544-8969 fax Ethan@nagellmn.com Sincerely, T anson Anderson 1 Craig I. Jwhu , Project Engineer cc: Matt Leonard, Public Works Director Ethan Waytas, Nagell Appraisal Permanent Easement for Right —Of —Way purposes per Doc.#768619 Most Northerly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, 6 MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER SECOND ADDITION 21.93 — 555'55'S8" E 2.00 M°N n° s e}en ` \ SFCO 1 I _ " y c =="Y� \ N °F BfF 0.°SNee °re p oN}i S,s90 �36 \ �'y`S°E'°n \Q °US'"Fss /�Q .v�o c� fn'rFn}.oel _—_ 17.00 e,no °NOS Bi N32-03'371011, E p o0 �2 `` d zzu 65 \ d �_ �1c wG o 9\ 2 'l's Rs / PARCEL 1 MONnc e \� cIz cl Zw yF� f� Al \ Easement Exhibit r, City of Monticello PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: A permanent easement for sidewalk purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER SECOND ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota; lying North of the following described line and its extensions: Beginning at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 55 degrees 55 minutes 58 seconds East, assuming the southerly line of said Lot 1 bears South 59 degrees 22 minutes 43 seconds East, a distance of 21.93 feet; thence South 62 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 71.58 feet; thence South 59 degrees 07 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 111.38 feet; thence southeasterly 58.65 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north, said curve having a radius of 152.00 feet and a central angle of 22 degrees 06 minutes 27 seconds to the Northeasterly line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating. EXCEPT That part of said Lot 1 described as a permanent right of way easement per Document Number 768619. ALSO EXCEPT The Northeasterly 2.00 feet of said Lot 1. PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER SECOND ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota; lying Northeasterly and Easterly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the most Easterly comer of said Lot 1; thence South 34 degrees 26 minutes 29 seconds West, assumed bearing along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 42.17 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 09 degrees 09 minutes 46 seconds West a distance of 34.38 feet; thence North 50 degrees 50 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 46.34 feet; thence North 55 degrees 39 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 81.71 feet; thence North 32 degrees 03 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 17.00 feet to the Northeasterly line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating. EXCEPT That part of said Lot 1 lying North of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 55 degrees 55 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 21.93 feet, assuming the southerly line of said Lot 1 bears South 59 degrees 22 minutes 43 seconds East; thence South 62 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 71.58 feet; thence South 59 degrees 07 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 111.38 feet; thence southeasterly 58.65 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north, said curve having a radius of 152.00 feet and a central angle of 22 degrees 06 minutes 27 seconds to a point on the Northeasterly line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating. ALSO EXCEPT That part of said Lot 1 described as a permanent street, utility, and drainage easement per Document Number A1012890. ALSO EXCEPT The Northeasterly 2.00 feet of said Lot 1. ' T Property Owner: SB 24, LLC PIN# 155148001010 9234 STATE H WY 25 NE DATE REVISION 02/20/24 Revise Tvpoaraphical Error I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State gonesota,<2Bn Date 01/18/24 Uo. No. 49138 Proposed Permanent r&a�n Easement = 1926 SF 30 0 30 60 I/ Proposed Temporary SCALE IN FEET Ij"/� Easement = 1744 SF DESIGNED BY. BP Parcel 1 SHEET Hakanson Anderson DRAWN 0'. Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors JJ 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Right of Way and or am Of. 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 Easement Exhibit 1 BP www.haa—inc.com DATE 01/18/24 1 FILE NO. M0305 SHEETS I Report Type Appraisal Report f F File # G2403013 — Parcel 1 �7 J �7 J �7 J 711 A Effective Date March 28, 2024 Prepared By: Ethan Waytas, MAI, Appraiser William R. Waytas, Appraiser Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 12805 Highway 55, Suite 300 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Tel:952.544.8966 1 Fax:952.544.8969 *0 NAGELL APPRAISAL INCORPORATED 12805 Highway 55, #300 Plymouth, MN 55441 Established in 1968 City of Monticello Attn: Matt Leonard, Public Works Director, City of Monticello 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362 To Matt Leonard: Phone: 952-544-8966 Fax: 952-544-8969 April 5, 2024 In accordance with your request, an appraisal report has been made on the following described property: Subject Property: Commercial 9234 State Highway 25 Northeast Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 Described below is a summary of the appraisal report contained herein. Property Overview The City of Monticello is a reconstruction of School Boulevard. Per the city project website, the purpose of the project is to "Increase pedestrian safety and reduce potential conflict points along the School Boulevard corridor." Improvements include a new pedestrian crossing at the Meadow Oak Avenue and Fenning Avenue roundabout crossing Fenning Avenue, extension of the sidewalk in -front of Eastview Education Center connecting south to School Boulevard to help with bus drop-off and pick-up, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard at Pelican Lane, removal of pedestrian crossing on School Boulevard at Eider Lane, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard between Eider Lane and Fallon Avenue, improvements to the School Boulevard High School entrance to include right -turn channelization for vehicles exiting the parking lot and a refuge island for pedestrians, install radar feedback speed signs on School Boulevard, and extend trail on the south side of School Boulevard between Cardinal Hills Park and Fenning Avenue. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring new right-of-way, permanent easement, and temporary easements. The subject is improved with a multi -tenant commercial building. County information indicates the building was constructed in 2003 and has 18,624 SF of gross building area. The gross site area is 98,446 SF. The proposed project was concluded to not impact the subject building improvements. Therefore, only the land and any site improvements in the acquisition area are analyzed to conclude to damages. This report reflects the data found and the opinions concluded from a before and after value appraisal of the subject property (land only). Intended Use Acquisition negotiation purposes by the city Intended User(s) City of Monticello iii Letter of Transmittal - Continued Extraordinary Assumptions None Hvpothetical Conditions Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Propertv Riqhts Appraised - Fee Simple Interest: The subject is used for commercial purposes. Given the scope of the assignment, the appraisal reflects the fee simple interest. Property Components Appraised - Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. - Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment (FF&E): The appraised value does not include personal property or FF&E. - Business Value: The appraised value does not include business value. Hiqhest and Best Use Conclusions - As Vacant: Develop with a commercial use if the site was vacant. - As Improved: Not applicable given the scope of the assignment. Valuation Methodoloqv Given the nature of the project, only the land is being appraised and any site improvements in the acquisition area. • Before Value: The before condition reflects market value before the proposed acquisition. • After Value: The after value reflects the property after the acquisition which considers any changes in site size, new easements, loss of any site improvements, and/or any severance damages to the remainder (if appropriate). • Temporary Easement: A fair rate of return the property owner should receive for use of the temporary easement area during the easement period, if any. 1V Letter of Transmittal — Continued The property is legally described herein. The appraisal assumes that the property meets all current environmental standards. The appraisal analysis and conclusions are subject to certain limiting conditions and assumptions described herein. The final value opinion, as of March 28, 2024, is: Before Market Value (land value): $985,000 After Market Value (land value): $966,703 DAMAGES DUE TO ACQUSITION: $18,297 Temporary Easement Cost: $2,907 TOTAL (damages plus temporary easement cost): $21,300 rnd. Exposure Time / Marketina Time Final values reflect "market exposure" time of 12 months before the effective date Exposure Time: of the appraisal. Changes in the market, use, lease and/or building subsequent to the effective appraisal date could impact value. Marketing Time: I Marketing times for appropriately priced properties is generally 12 months +/-. Our company has 10 employees, has been in business since 1968 and has sufficient knowledge, education, experience, resources and/or contacts to competently complete this assignment. The accompanying report contains data secured from my personal investigation and from sources considered to be reliable; however, correctness is not guaranteed. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements contained in this report are true and correct. Neither my employment to make this appraisal, nor the compensation, is contingent upon the value reported. This report has been prepared in conformity with the code of professional ethics and standards of professional appraisal practice of the Appraisal Institute and appraisal standards set forth by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Please contact us if you have further questions. Sincerely, �i Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 www.nagelimn.com William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 V TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS ....................... VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY .................... INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL .................................................... DATE OF APPRAISAL............................................................................. SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT .................................................. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED.......................................................... PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED ............................................. IDENTIFICATION..................................................................................... REAL ESTATE TAXES............................................................................ SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY .............................................. REGIONAL DATA..................................................................................... REGIONAL MAP...................................................................................... CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION ............................................. NEIGHBORHOOD MAP........................................................................... SURROUNDING USES............................................................................ BEFORE ANALYSIS................................................................................ SITE DESCRIPTION................................................................................ ZONINGMAP........................................................................................... ZONING.................................................................................................... FUTURE LAND USE MAP....................................................................... FLOODMAP............................................................................................. AERIAL / PLAT MAP................................................................................ TOPOGRAPHYMAP............................................................................... WETLAND MAP....................................................................................... SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS.................................................................... HIGHEST AND BEST USE...................................................................... COSTAPPROACH................................................................................... INCOME APPROACH.............................................................................. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH....................................................... RECONCILIATION................................................................................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME .................................................. AFTER ANALYSIS................................................................................... PROJECT DESCRIPTION....................................................................... PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP.................................................................... SKETCH OF ACQUISITION..................................................................... PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA ............................................ ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE ..................................................... SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES .................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME .................................................. DEFINITIONS........................................................................................... ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES ........................................ EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ...................................... CERTIFICATION...................................................................................... CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER.............................................................. QUALIFICATIONS.................................................................................... .. 7 .. 8 .. 8 .. 8 .. 9 10 10 11 11 12 13 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 40 40 41 56 56 57 58 60 61 62 63 65 65 66 67 67 68 70 71 72 SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS -- - Location: 9234 State Highway 25 Northeast, Monticello Project: School Boulevard Parcel Number: 1 Appraisal Report: Appraisal Report Current Use: Commercial Extraordinary Assumptions: No, see rear of report for standard assumptions Hypothetical Conditions: Yes, see rear of report Site Area: 98,446 SF (2.26 acres) Building Improvements: Commercial building, constructed in 2003, gross building area of 18,624 SF Current Zoning: B-3, Highway Business (guided CC, Community Commercial) Highest & Best Use: Future commercial development Personal Property: No personal property included Property Rights Appraised: Fee Simple Right of Way Acquisition: None Existing Prescriptive Area: None Permanent Easement: 1,926 Temporary Easement 1,744 SF Temporary Easement Length: 20 months: April 1, 2024 to December 1, 2025 TOTAL DAMAGES & COSTS: $21,300 rounded Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 7 VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY Type of Value: This report provides an opinion of Market Value. Condition of Value: This report provides an opinion of the as -is value. Occupancy: The subject is improved with a commercial building. INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL The client intends to use the appraisal for acquisition negotiation purposes. No party, other than the named client and listed intended users, may use or Intended Use: rely upon any part of this report without the prior written authorization of both the named client and the appraiser. This report is not valid unless it contains the original signatures in blue ink. Any unauthorized third party relying upon any portion of this report does so at its own risk. Intended User(s): City of Monticello DATE OF APPRAISAL Effective Date Inspection Date Date of Report March 28, 2024 March 28, 2024 April 5, 2024 Page 8 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT USPAP defines Scope of Work as: The type and extent of research and analyses in an assignment. For each appraisal, appraisal review and appraisal consulting assignment, an appraiser must: 1) Identify the problem to be solved, 2) Determine and perform the scope of work necessary to develop credible assignment results; and 3) Disclose the scope of work in the report. 1) I Provide a reasonably supported value opinion as it relates to the intended use & scope. Per assignment request (retained in workfile), the following degree of research and analysis has 2) been made. The narrative format used is an Appraisal Report, which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2a of USPAP. See individual approaches for further detail. The scope of work for this appraisal includes: a) Property Identification: Public record, plat maps, zoning maps and aerial photographs were used to identify the subject property. b) Property Inspection: A viewina of the subiect property and neiahborhood by the appraiser. Physical factors: Based on property viewing and conversations with the client, city and county officials. Lot size is based on county information. Economic Factors: Consisted of gathering of information from market experts, city and/or county offices, and internet about the region, community, neighborhood, zoning, utilities, and any pending projects in the area that may affect the subject property. • c) Extent of Data Researched: Sales data of competing properties within the subject 3) market area were given primary consideration. The most relevant data is used in this report. Sources include, appraiser data files, assessor, internet, developers, agents, MLS, periodicals, in -office library, etc. In addition, during the course of appraisal practice and of this appraisal process, the appraiser has had ongoing discussions with market participants (buyers, sellers, property managers, real estate agents/brokers, appraisers, etc.) and/or viewed market data in relation to how the current real estate market may impact the subject value. The appraiser has not researched the title or ownership records. • d) Type and Extent of Analysis Applied at Opinions or Conclusions: An extensive review of market data was performed. The most recent, similar and proximate data has been used. The data used will be adjusted on a grid. Reasonable and appropriate collection, verification, analysis and viewing has been performed in the valuation approaches, given the purpose and intended use of the report. A final value opinion will be discussed and correlated. The data used was obtained from sources considered credible, yet its accuracy is not guaranteed. If found otherwise, value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 9 I PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED What is valued in a real property appraisal is an estate subject to specified interests. Therefore, an appraiser's task is to identify not only the estate (e.g., the fee simple estate, the leasehold estate, the leased fee estate, the life estate) but also the interests associated with the real estate, such as leases, easements, restrictions, encumbrances, reservations, covenants, contracts, declarations, special assessments, ordinances, or other interests of a similar nature. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15tn Edition, Page 59) Fee Simple Interest: Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 71" Edition) Note: This would typically reflect an owner -occupied property. When the property rights appraised are the unencumbered fee simple interest of the real estate, the appraised value is subject to normal easements for drainage, public streets and utilities, if any. The effect of any existing mortgage or delinquent taxes on the subject property has not been considered in this appraisal. Leased Fee Interest: The ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7t" Edition) In appraisal practice, the lessor's interest in a property is considered a leased fee regardless of the duration of the lease, the specified rent, the parties to the lease, or any of the terms in the lease contract. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, Page 62) Conclusion of Rights Appraised: The subject is currently used for commercial purposes. Given the scope of the assignment, the fee simple interest will be applied. PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. The methods utilized for the real estate valuation include: • Sales Comparison Approach FF&E: The appraised value does not include any values of fixtures, furnishings and equipment. Business Value: There is no business value included in the appraised value. Page 10 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 IDENTIFICATION Address: County PID Legal: Fee Owner: Census Tract #: 9234 State Highway 25 Northeast Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 155-148-001010 SECT-14 TWP-121 RANGE-025 MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 2ND LOT-001 BLOCK-001 SB 24 LLC 1002.06 REAL ESTATE TAXES Taxes, per County Records Payable 2023 Payable 2024 Total Effective Tax $55,802 $68,546 Special Assessments / Solid Waste Fee / $-0 $0 Other Total Tax & Assessments: $55,802 $68,546 Delinquent taxes: None noted COUNTY ASSESSOR'S VALUE Payable 2023 Payable 2024 Land $734,600 $1,057,600 Building $1,490,400 $1,833,000 TOTAL $2,225,000 $2,890,600 The subject tax ratio is 2.37%. The assessed value and taxes shown above reflect the overall property. The appraised value given in this report assumes any/all special assessments, and/or liens are paid in full and that there are no delinquent taxes, fees, payments, association dues, etc. Should it be found that any of these exist the amount should be deducted from the appraised value. Appraiser did not research these items; typically, a title search would reveal any of these. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 11 SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY Listing History: I The subject does not appear to be currently listed for sale. Sale Price: n/a Sale Date: n/a Buyer. n/a Seller: n/a Sales History: Terms: n/a Source: Public records No reported sales of the subject within the past 3 years. Pending Sale: I None noted or reported. The subject is improved with a commercial building that is occupied by Building History: multiple tenants. The structure was built in 2003 and has a total building area of 18,624 SF, per public records. Lease History: I None provided. Leasehold Interest: I None noted Association Dues: The subject is reportedly not part of an association or common interest community (CIC). Page 12 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL DATA Metro Area Regional hub Minneapolis -Saint Paul is the most populous urban area in Minnesota and is composed of 186 cities and townships. Built around the Mississippi, Minnesota and St. Croix rivers, the area is also nicknamed The Twin Cities for its two largest cities, Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Saint Paul is the second largest city in Minnesota, as well as the state capital. The area is part of a larger U.S. Census division named Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI, the country's 16th-largest metropolitan area, composed of eleven counties in Minnesota and two counties in Wisconsin. This larger area, in turn, is enveloped in the U.S. Census combined statistical area called Minneapolis -St. Paul -St. Cloud, MN -WI with an estimated population of 3.65 million people in 2019. In both of the fully developed central cities —Minneapolis and St. Paul —the population has declined due to smaller household sizes, yet growth in other areas of their counties has been more than offsetting. Below is detailed where this growth has occurred: POPULATION Census Census Forecast Growth Growth County 2000 2010 2022 2000 - 2010 2010-2022 total annual total annual Hennepin 1,116,200 1,152,425 1,260,121 3.25% 0.32% 9.35% 0.78% Ramsey 511,035 508,640 536,413 -0.47% -0.05% 5.46% 0.46% m Dakota 355,904 398,552 443,341 11.98% 1.20% 11.24% 0.94% m N Anoka 298,084 330,844 368,864 10.99% 1.10% 11.49% 0.95% c Washington 201,130 238,136 275,912 18.4% 1.84% 15.86% 1.32% d Scott 89,498 129,928 154,520 45.17% 4.52% 18.93% 1.58% Wright 89,986 124,700 148,003 38.58% 3.86% 18.69% 1.56% v Carver 70,205 91,042 110,034 29.68% 2.97% 20.86% 1.74% 0' Sherburne 64,417 88,499 100,824 37.38% 3.74% 13.93% 1.16% U) Chisago 41,101 53,887 57,988 31.11% 3.11% 7.61% 0.63% Total 2,837,560 3,116,653 3,456,020 1 9.84% 0.98% 10.89% 0.91% Overall, the area has experienced moderate to good income growth. Annualized income growth of 2.5% to 4.0% is consistent with national averages. MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME Census Estimate Growth County 2010 2022 2010-2022 total annual Hennepin 59,236 92,595 56.32% 4.69% M Ramsey 50,136 78,108 55.79% 4.65% m Dakota 69,508 101,360 45.82% 3.82% y Anoka 65,771 95,782 45.63% 3.80% Washington 77,239 110,828 43.49% 3.62% Scott 77,314 118,268 53.00% 4.41% v Wright 66,833 102,980 54.09% 4.51% c Carver 80,173 116,308 45.07% 3.76% ti Sherburne 69,971 96,889 38.47% 3.21 % Chisago 63,810 97,446 52.71 % 4.39% Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 13 Regional Data — continued Economic Trends The current residential interest rates for a typical 30-year mortgage are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Commercial rates are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Rates are expected to increase to combat inflation. New construction labor costs have steadily increased along with material costs as well, however during the COVID-19 pandemic costs increased drastically due to supply chains not being able to meet demand. Overall, construction costs are at all-time highs. New construction of commercial, industrial, and multi -family is occurring, however, limited office new construction is occurring. Listing prices have been increasing steadily since 2012 +/- and are starting to approach peak levels similar to the market in 2006, which was a period of high seller expectations. However, recent buyer and seller expectations regarding value and list prices appear to be trending towards equilibrium. Although well diversified, the TCMA and surrounding Minnesota economy is not immune to the recent soft/declining trends of the overall economy. k,20 Minnesota Index 0n20 Grc-20 324 32.8 137,1 Ynl] 1.111 Irby 11 Ap, 11 13A.I 1i9,S 110.7 111.S MY 21 tun 11 1.2.3 111.I 4111 A.S 21 1�3,6 144.5 Sg21 IAS,S %Ch.W Man MaM As. 0.7 Yan As. 9.9 Sep2013 S,p2020 S2021 U. S. Index Sp10 II2.9 OR-20 12" ri 124.3 0-20 12" A-21 125A Rb21 12SS M7-21 11" Apr-21 126S MP21 117s P-21 127.9 AA21 12M.9 A339.21 129A SAy21 129.9 %0.W Man MaA A@. 0.4 Y—No 5,3 Source: Minnesota DEED The recent COVID-19 pandemic created a significant drop in the economy due to high unemployment and decreased spending in early 2020. However, spending has increased, employment is recovering, and the COVID-19 vaccines have given markets stability. Page 14 Regional Data — continued EMPLOYMENT & LABOR FRED — Unemployment Rate in Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI (MSA) — Unemployment Rate in Minnesota Unemployment Rate I50 iro7A 10.0 f 7.5 - a 5-0 2.5 00 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1995 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Shaded areas indicate U.S. recessions. Source- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics fred.stlouisfed.org Over the past ten years, unemployment rates have gone from a peak of around 9.0% to near historical lows of around 2% in late 2018. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created a significant spike in the unemployment rate. The most recent data, shown below, indicates that the rate has dropped significantly and is approaching 2019 levels. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 15 Regional Data — continued APARTMENT MARKET Vacancy & Market Asking Rent Per Unit 8.0% Fvecest E1.900 7.5% $1,800 7.0% $1,700 g 8.5% $1,600 8y 60% $1, 500 S 55% $1 d00 5.0% $1,300 l.6% $1 " l.0% $1.100 3.5% I I3 I 1� I 1, 16 1J I 19 19 A I 11 171 13 74 I 2e 15 ?! I 61.000 ■ Vecancv %. N 4 'Mel rienU. � i .,11I .11 Sd aay Mrn>•m i.. Yu70!) CoStar reports that rents have been trending upward consistently for the past 10+ years. The current average asking rate for an apartment unit in the Twin Cities Metro is around $1,398 per month. Vacancy has fluctuated, but was trending downward until 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a spike in vacancy, which has since been declining. However, vacancy is higher due to significant new construction, both in Minneapolis and surrounding suburbs. The following chart shows the annual absorption of apartment units: Absorption Units 5 9 3K s 2KW 0 J�� Costar attar cnev l.w.a.,.a ec. r1am11 Page 16 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued RETAIL MARKET Vacancy Rate \cr Askiii.,4 Hale l n Itr( 4ul'lructfun V L5% O $19.06 per sq. ft. 28,000 sq. ft. Figure I Direct Vacancy Rote and Absorption 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 (200,000) (400,000) �Abwrption Vacancy Sour(e. (BRE Research, Nl 2021 Nct Ah%orplinn 2131771 sq. h. 9 B 7 6 5 d 3 2 1 0 CBRE indicates that current retail vacancy rates have been increasing and asking rent rates have been declining. There has been absorption of vacant space in the market, however, many developers are cautious about new retail construction. Strong locations retain typical demand; more speculative retail construction generally does not occur. Similarly, Cushman & Wakefield also shows stagnating retail asking rents and increasing vacancy R E_ % T R 4 T � �27 S26 2016 2017 201E �Askng Rent S PSF Dyed Vacancy Rate O% 2020 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 17 Regional Data — continued OFFICE MARKET CBRE data shows that asking rents for the overall office market have generally been increasing. This has also corresponded with an increase in vacancy rates as well. With the COVID-19 pandemic, many employers and workers realized that working remotely was a viable option. It is anticipated that many more companies will offer remote work full-time or part-time; this could impact office space as companies need less square footage. The counterpoint, however, is that companies might retain the same space and create social distancing opportunities in case of possible future COVID-19 flare-ups. FIGURE a Historical Vacancy Rates vs Asking Rates Vacancy Rate 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Avg Asking Rate (NNN) $18.50 $18.00 $17.50 $17.00 $16.50 $16.00 $15.50 $15.00 $10.50 $30.00 �p171 �'I'll �D.y'L 'C$ o% C` Downtown Vacancy Suburban Vacancy Downtown Asking Rate -Suburban Asking Rate Source CBRE Research 01 20M_ FIGURE 4: Historical Downtown Vacancy by Class Vacancy Rate 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 032019 0120v 03vv 0., 03202, 012022 0' 2Zov 012023 -Class A -Class B -Class C Suurue: CBRE Re urn^ 012723 FIGURE 5. Historical Suburban Vacancy by Class Vacancy Rate 36% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 032pt9 0,2p20 032p20 C Z02ti 037o 0" 2022 032022 0� 20 L3 -Class A -Class B -Class C Source CBRE Re earcr,. 012023 Page 18 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued INDUSTRIAL MARKET The industrial market nationwide has seen increases in rental rates and occupancy. Construction costs have been increasing as well, due to shortages created by the COVID-19 pandemic. In Minnesota the trend is similar to the country overall, vacancy has decreased, construction of new buildings is significant, CBRE indicates that vacancy has been dropping, construction starts have increased, and absorption is significant: RGURE 1: Quarterly and Annual Net Absorption vs. Vacancy Net Absorption Vacancy (MSF) 10 7% 9 6% 8 7 5% 6 5 4% 4 3% 3 2 2% 1% 0 — 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Oy, �01 �02 �03 04 —Vacancy Rate �aurce.CBRE Research 012023 Speculative development, per CBRE, has been significant. For example, almost 5,538,000 million square feet of speculative construction occurred in 2021/2021; of this, 9% has been leased. Buildings in 2022 are about 61% leased. It appears the market is supporting speculative industrial development at this time. =IGURE 3: Deliveries, Absorption. and Availability Rate for Speculative Construction SF (000's) 30 35% 25 30% 25% 20 20% 1s 15% 10 10% 5 lid �� Ii 1111A l 5% 0 I)% y� ti� ti� .� , .,O 10 ti0 ,ti'ti ti7 ti~ ,tit titi titi -0, tiL ti� ti0 ti0 10 ti0 ti0 LO 10 ti0 10 10 If, .ti0 ,ti0 10 If, ,ti0 LO O1 d9 O�' O° O1 d1 O�' Op Oti O� C� Cp dti O� C� Cp d~ Spec Deliveries Spec Absorption Spec Availability Rate Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 19 Regional Data — continued Cushman & Wakefield also reports decreasing vacancy rates and significant increases in asking rates for industrial space. OVERALL VACANCY & ASKING RENT le 6P aaaaa� As. r - ?ent a r-- r t� 8% 4% rry Rabe Total construction and absorption has been generally stable, but in 2021 there was significantly more absorption than construction. This would imply there is demand for more industrial space. SPACE DEMAND !DELIVERIES a. 6 N 4 i 2 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 YTD 2023 ■Net Ansorpbon. SF ■Construction Completors SF Page 20 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL MAP St. Stephen ror,, 23 n 'Braham West Sweden N T 0 N St.Wemd6 — MILL LAC 65, Rush CRY: Stanchfield Trade Lake eric Frederic Sartell 25 )n Springy.l.. . . . ....... .. .. . ........ Ncollegeville F 3vdz 05 Wyanett Harris P 0 ,t,lo'� SI,Ci,"d P Luck ..... ........ ........... ........... . . ...... Cambridge* ..... ... ... St C.. I S A N T I Eureka Milltown Spencer Bradford Eta h. Center Or ook Isanti _"tsokp 0 ockvilleE Augusta R B U R N E Orrock 'C.rduria 'Oalsai .4 learwal Taylors I Lake Beck•er ................... .......... . P St Francis ............. Falls C nt ity a er CRY c Llnclstror�� East Bethel Dresser Subject Chisago City gill M• M cello Blk River' Oak Oro Vvyo mki ve �sceola 2�) Annandale Otsego A N 0 'Forest Lake A W I S W R 1 0 _s H T bertylle Ramsey vile East oillinclover Maple Lake' lot!., Farmington t CRY St. Michael o9pr 4 Albion Center Buffalo Ch—plin. Coon Rapid. is I Star Prairie E R I h :North 0"k, Lake Stanton Beine' CentervilleHugo Fork Crow onoSomerset L.k. Park ef Y\Ihft. Bear Darwin Corcoran Brooklyn Park, Beach N.,. Richmond _ Cokedo Rockford Maple Groveu Brooklyn Fridl Shorev vir Dassel Waverly_ M I-N N E S 0 T A C.rd.,. WASHINGTON Sill Howard Lake :* Lake Sarah He. Brighton EY Mahlomedi Ne,,illHope Oak Park Heights S T. C -1 8 JW, Delano loolependen- ]� . . 8 140 h St. Paul _R Crystal Cry fis Pwoutte L Fn, on Hek Orono gil gW-- ood, Elmo E�ypo`rt Roberts Hudson Hammond. .... ......... Ill .. ........................... ...... a ate _C 'a Long Lake a st ,�dc 0.kdall�e V ey Minne polls akelan Wristed ordeal St. Paid Spring Park IlAnnialtordea. Loul Perk IfoWbiodloury .Silver Lake _.Hollywood H. in., �p Afton Minn6trls!W Deephaven' W_ st, Lester Prairie 7�—n..on d woo din. Lake; Shorewood 169 , . . I S-thst.p.ul J: lli� endQt. nir C N Rwhfiis j N Id , I .............................. Chanhassen I Cottage don, rairee River Falls M C L 0 D Waconia 1 cm C A R V E R 4-1 i-2-12- Blo ington, "Eagan brillowpee.. Heights Glencoe 1 America. _ D. Burnsville Creek sairage . Appl� Valloy H-ting . s Ares P I E R C E Hamburg Prior Trimbelle Ellsworth Lake N AuoUrn 36, , ................ Lakeville L, 1:1 T A Jor dan rL - Helena Farmington Arlington alle Plane I 21i Cedar Lake Trenton Bay City S I B L E S C 0 T T 109 19 'Gaylord Rock 20 Red Wing Henderson�,- en de, ............ Cestle ... ....... ... Webster Lansdale i 1 3 1 Gannon Cannon Falls ueur as .............................. .......... 10 0 0 0 D H U E Wheatland Lafayette .1--ington 'Mordg* ornery I 5si Goodhue N I C 0 L L E T Le Carter 1131 L E S u E UA R��C .......... S t I. Peter Cleveland; Cannon City State .Mascta Wn. W�E Farib@uK Zumbrota Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 21 CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Type of neighborhood: Outlying Suburban Northwestern Community Percent built-up: 90% developed (within city limits) Stage of Development: Stable with growth Neighborhood boundaries: City Limits Redevelopment Some new development and updating are occurring Major Transportation: Interstate 94, Highway 25 Single Family Residential 65% Two- & Multi -Family 10% Predominant type & conformity: Commercial/Industrial 15% Other/Vacant/Public Land 10% Total: 100 % Typical property age: New to 75+ years, predominant under 30 years Single -Family Home Sales: $125,000 to $400,000+ Apartment Sales: $40,000 to $80,000+ per unit Office Property Sales: $75 to $125+ per SF Retail Property Sales: $100 to $200+ per SF Industrial Property Sales: $40 to $80+ per SF Capitalization Rates: 7-10% Historic Subject Market: Stable, some growth Neighborhood Trend: Stable, some growth Detrimental influences: No major apparent Area / City: Monticello is located about 45 minutes northwest of Downtown Minneapolis and 40 minutes southeast of St. Cloud. Access to Interstate 94 is conveniently located near the subject parcel. Interstate 94 provides direct access to the Twin Cities Metro Area, St. Cloud, and surrounding communities. Monticello has a reputation as a stable community, with nearby shopping and access to many major roadways. Access to Downtown and surrounding communities is considered average. Major shopping and commerce are located within the City of Monticello. Neighborhood: The subject is located in southern Monticello near the Highway 25 corridor. Surrounding uses include commercial, residential, and future development land. Page 22 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 City & Neighborhood Description — continued Subject City: As of the 2010 census the population was 12,759, in 2000 it was 7,868. This represents a net increase of 62.2% from 2000 to 2010. The 2020 population for the city is 14,455, an increase of 13.3% from 2010. The 2022 population estimate for the city is 14,804, or about an increase of 2.4% from 2020. Median Income 2019 to 2022 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60, 000 $40, 000 $20,000 $0 2019 2020 2021 2022 ■ Minnesota ■ Wright County • Monticello The median income for the city is below county levels and state levels (per Census Bureau). Income has increased in recent years. Median Home Prices: Citv of Monticello Source: NorthstarMLS Stats Median Sales Price Twin Cures Region — Monticello t: $300K $275K $250K $225K . 1-2019 1-2020 1-2021 1-2022 1-2023 1-2024 Twin Cibes Region & Monticello Each Gala print is 12 months d —Ay. Data is from April 1. 2024 AN data from NOM WNLS. Data deemed reliable but not guaranteed. InfoSp ft ®2024 ShowingTme. The median household income for the city is below the Twin Cities Metro. The median home price started to plateau since the start of 2022; this is likely attributed to increasing interest rates. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 23 NEIGHBORHOOD MAP If Course pd �v 4t, Ist 14 Monticello 64 Ist `Si w PV '54/7 St Ist k7 39 '% v " NW fir,. 52 03 "is - VVe Y- 76 25 Subject 'Z,Iwo W 'a 'r J k011berg Ct E= St P E i L 1 Page 24 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Wmli— Savannah Ave a4q - I f Pro irecc Re'storationr y..n Y• p¢a Ra rch y.t # a een D'er ologyb ,I • Aroplax Corporatio,�n�*- X �- - _ / rr De>nfiavPn nn�NmPn+� �: 1 0llo N • �.. �/�'-" •. 41Lakel��� _'""r _Transmission & Auto �� • - • I`bP et ls,� Due.__-_. __ ..__. .: F •.�,, f '_ '. Ma"Watce � r� D1n11Js Rd M11ar<ie'S Farr ,� ,i:8 t i dwiid » r • i''♦�jME Compan "r cry a Monticello >�' rta.,�.• Dent F.-. Ea 9'e Rfca In 1 D - \Q�a r �C17 AILDI �Ema Movie S Theater Totally -® • . •� Llttl :an ® Spa fvto E - �n ceT P T = � • i —h Or ild WIn9 �E�ol�tho�MonOe �S�Dool Blvd school BI a j� _ P D6etr� kD m 1 * - l9• 9 1 qt. ling T keg6erg;ct `\ V Seam • • _ ram, The Me300:.5 1A11HC GJtte,� �., ,�i Fallon Di /r t'riel/be t ,.t ieneer Pak:. �Voren°rr w �, • C DiamondDr i r9'Ct K Ober CI Kjellte:9 PaiF 'C. 1Dl toll, Nate's.Pamtlna Eaton.GirpLLC Minneapolis is t Theisens Mobile lYi ak'Or r,BSIh St Mechanic gsr4. • Gol . • t oFj SP�� � • BSm Y. :. ;1 r E LL v �.M/tea 1 W+r *• Hey Girl Beauty Co BEFORE ANALYSIS Page 26 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SITE DESCRIPTION Dimensions: Gross Site Area: Net Site Area: Topography / Low Area: Shape: Soil conditions: Drainage: Utilities: Electricity / Gas: Water / Sanitary Sewer: Off -Site Improvements: Street/Curb-gutter: Sidewalk: Visual Road Condition: Street Lights / Alley: Storm Sewer: Access to site (#) / Frontage Traffic Count: Visibility: Flood hazard zone: Apparent Easements: Encroachments: Unusual Conditions: Use: Land to Building ratio Excess/Surplus Land: Functional Adequacy: Surrounding Uses: Distance to Major Road Rectangular 98,446 SF (2.26 acres), per county, confirmed with aerial GIS measure 98,446 SF (2.26 acres) Somewhat level / None noted Rectangular Assumed to be stable Appears adequate Yes / Yes Public water / Public sanitary sewer Asphalt / Concrete Asphalt and concrete (along School Boulevard), concrete along Cedar Street Dated to Average Standard / None Yes Highway 25 (no access), School Boulevard (no access), Cedar Street (one) The MnDOT traffic count map indicates 6,251 vehicles per day (in 2022) along School Boulevard, 15,875 vehicles per day (in 2022) along Highway 25 Average to Good The site does not appear to be in the flood zone, see following map Typical utility and drainage assumed None apparent, no survey provided None noted Commercial n/a None noted Functional site N Commercial E Commercial S Commercial W Commercial About 1/2 block west to Highway 25 Comments: The subject is located along the Highway 25 corridor. The surrounding uses include mostly commercial properties. The subject site has average development appeal. No apparent adverse influences or easements noted or reported. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 27 ,os f ♦ � m III► iin .��. ■11\�i�,�. (~ ail ■■n.�..\G L� U\� s •rr■��ur■s �j �..^.■. 'go/off/ "q&q nTi u r����j �� U► i ■u E ,��11111/�`������� ur ur►��it :1���11► �� �Qt� � 11'O��i.r�Hill 11 ZONING Subject Zoning: B-3, Highway Business District The purpose of the "13-3" (highway business) district is to provide for Intent (city code): limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Agriculture; active park facilities (public); essential services; passive parks and open space; public buildings or uses; brew pub; business support services; commercial lodging; convenience retail; Permitted Uses: entertainment/recreation, indoor commercial; financial institution; offices, commercial and professional services; personal services; restaurants; retail commercial uses; retail service; specialty eating establishments; Passenger terminal; place of public assembly; auto -repair — minor; commercial self -storage; day care centers; entertain ment/recreation, Conditional Uses/Special outdoor commercial; event center; production brewery or micro - Permit: distillery with taproom or cocktail room; vehicle fuel sales; vehicle sales and rental; veterinary facilities (neighborhood); auto repair - major; land reclamation; wrecker and towing services; Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 29 I Zoning — Continued Offices, Professional and Commercial: 1.0 space for each bedroom, of which one must be enclosed, plus one guest parking Parking: space for every four units General Retail: 1.0 space for each 200 square feet Minimum lot size: None Maximum lot coveraqe: n/a Major Restriction/ Minimum lot width: 100' requirements in this district: Front vard setback: 30 feet Side vard setback: 10 feet interior lot and 20 feet street lot Rear yard setback: 20 feet Maximum buildinq heiqht: 30 feet or 2.0 stories Use: The existing use appears to be allowed and permitted; if found otherwise, the value could differ. Source: Zoning map, city code Page 30 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Future Land Use Map — Continued The CC, Community designation is described as the following in the city's comprehensive plan: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) The Community Commercial designation includes low -scale retail, service, and office uses located along the City's arterials and collector streets. Some of these areas are developed as auto -oriented "strip" shopping centers while others are freestanding offices, commercial uses, or clusters of businesses Intended to meet the needs of the community at large. Typical retail uses would include supermarkets, drug stores and miscellaneous local -serving retail stores and services. Typical office commercial uses might include banks, finance, real estate, medical and dental offices, and professional services. Typical service commercial uses might indude gas stations, restaurants including fast food, used car sales, and minor auto repair businesses. Commercial Office/Retail Supermarkets Shopping Centers Restaurants Gas Stations Primary Made Vehicular with access to collector and arterials �F Transit or Recreational shuttle service P _ ., Secondary Mode - Public space y, Shared bike/ pedestrian facilities r eC Comprehensive Plan Conclusion: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.30 to 0.50 Height - 1-2 stories Lot Area - WA 2018 Correlating J Zoning District B-2 Limited Business District B-3 Highway Business District The subject is guided for a commercial use, which is consistent with the current zoning. Page 32 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 12firereloWhyZi FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Map Number 2705340015E Zone X Map Date August 04, 1988 RIPS 27171 MAPLEGEND 1-1 Areas inundated by 500-year flooding El Areas inundated by 100-year flooding ❑ Velocity Hazard The subject is indicated by the red arrow, the improvements are not located in a flood zone Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 33 AERIAL / PLAT MAP The red outline reflects the subject gross site area, per county. Page 34 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 TOPOGRAPHY MAP The above topography map is from the MN DNR website. The site appears to be mostly level. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 35 WETLAND MAP jg� is it C'O ,a �_ • � � � �y''.',-i%'1 r ���A► pia � •h PEM,A The above wetland map is from the National Wetlands Inventory website. The subject is indicated by the red arrow. It appears there are no wetland areas. Note: The above exhibit is from the MN DNR NWI Wetland Finder. It is a preliminary wetland map that is not an official wetland delineation. That said, the NWI Wetland Finder is a good resource for the beginning of wetland research. Page 36 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Looking southwest on Cedar Street Looking northwest on School Boulevard Site view Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 37 HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and best use is defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition as, "The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria that the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity". Highest and best use is analyzed in two ways, site as vacant and site as improved. Typically, there are four criteria in highest and best use analysis Legally permissible uses What uses are allowed by zoning? Physically possible uses What uses are physically possible on the site? Financially feasible use Which possible and permissible uses will produce a positive return? Maximally productive use Of the financially feasible uses, which use produces the highest return warranted by the market (the ideal improvements)? Site as Vacant: The use of the real estate based on the presumption that the parcel of land is vacant or can be made vacant by demolishing any improvements (i.e., as vacant or as if vacant). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, page 307) Legally Permissible Uses: The current B-3, Highway Business District zoning allows for primarily commercial uses. The subject is guided for CC, Community Commercial which appears to be similar to the existing zoning. Physically Possible Uses: The subject site is rectangular and has a rectangular building pad area. Visibility and access to the property are rated average. The physical characteristics of the site appear suitable for development. The property has electricity, gas, public water, and public sanitary sewer available. Access to Highway 25 and Interstate 94 is nearby, which is also appealing. Financially Feasible Uses: Typically, surrounding uses, market demand, and availability of financing drive financially feasible uses. Surrounding Uses: Uses in the immediate area are commercial, residential, and future development land. A commercial use would be supported. Financing: Current interest rates range from 7.50% to 8.50%+. Borrowers typically must be well qualified with 20% to 30% down. Financing for owner occupied properties (residential, commercial, industrial, and business) is rated to be average to good. Financing for multi -tenant commercial or office is rated to be average, however, most projects must be substantially pre - leased before lenders will extend financing. The subject is zoned and guided for a commercial use. Financing for new commercial construction is rated to be average, with interest rates ranging from 6.75% to 7.75%+. Loan terms for new construction are typically 20% or more down and 25-year amortization rates. Market Demand: Market demand for commercial land in the subject area is average. The City of Monticello is within commuting distance of the Twin Cities Metro area. The city also has multiple national and regional retailers and medical providers that provide services to residents. Financially Feasible Uses: A commercial development is logical on the site. Given the location and overall size of the subject, development timing is likely now to 2+ years. Page 38 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Highest and Best Use — Continued Maximally Productive Use: The highest and best use as vacant is considered to be for a commercial development as market demand warrants and zoning allows. The subject site is large enough to accommodate a building for either a single user or a multi -tenant building. New construction generally results in average to good quality commercial buildings. Most Probable Buyer: Developer who would construct a commercial building. Valuation Methodology: Commercial land sales will be considered to value the subject. Site as Improved: The use that should be made of the real estate as it exists (i.e., as currently improved or as if improved as proposed). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, page 307) The subject is improved with a multi -occupant commercial building. This is similar to the highest and best use, as -if vacant. Given the scope of the assignment and acquisition area, this analysis is not applicable. However, a continued commercial use is logical. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 COST APPROACH The subject is being appraised as vacant land; therefore, the Cost Approach is not considered applicable and was not applied. INCOME APPROACH The Income Approach was not applied as rental and capitalization rate data for land like the subject is limited, which renders the approach unreliable. Page 40 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 L-Y-1T10 Tolh In the sales comparison approach, an opinion of market value is developed by comparing properties similar to the subject property that have recently sold, are listed for sale, or are under contract (i.e., for which purchase offers and a deposit have been recently submitted). A major premise of the sales comparison approach is that an opinion of the market value of a property can be supported by studying the market's reaction to comparable and competitive properties. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 351) Supply and Demand: Property prices result from negotiations between buyers and sellers. In a market with many buyers and sellers, buyers make up the market demand the properties offered for sale or lease currently or in the foreseeable future make up the supply. To estimate demand, appraisers consider the number of potential users of a particular type of property, their purchasing power, and their tastes and preferences. To analyze supply, appraisers focus on existing properties that are available on the market as well as properties that are being constructed, converted, or planned. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Substitution: The principle of substation holds that the value of property tends to be set by the cost of acquiring a substitute or alternative property of similar utility and desirability within a reasonable amount of time. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Balance: The forces of supply and demand tend toward equilibrium, or balance, in the market, but absolute equilibrium is almost never attained. Due to shifts in population, purchasing power, consumer tastes and preferences, and many other factors, demand varies greatly over time. The construction of new buildings, conversion of existing buildings to other uses, and demolition of old buildings cause supply to vary as well. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Externalities: External forces affect all types of property in positive or negative ways. Periods of economic growth and economic decline influence property values. Appraisers analyze the market area of the subject property to identify all significant external influences. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 353) When possible, select comparables with similar location, economic conditions and support facilities. Land Value: "Sales comparison is usually the preferred method for developing an opinion of site value. When this method is used, most of the techniques for selecting comparable sales and making adjustments that are described in Chapter 20 can be applied to site valuation. When there are not enough sales of similar parcels for the application of sales comparison, alternative methods such as market extraction, allocation, land residual analysis, and various income capitalization techniques may be used". (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 339) The Following Outline Is Used In The Sales Comparison Approach: - A location map of the comparable sales. - Comparable sales are listed. - An adjustment grid using the comparable sales. - A discussion of adjustment and conclusion of value. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 41 Comparable Location Map Primary Comparable Selection/Search Criteria: • Primary emphasis on commercial land sales • Sale date of January 1, 2021 +, older sales may be considered • 30,000 SF to 150,000 SF+ • Data from competing communities • In some instances, older data and/or data from competing communities will be utilized due to proximity to the subject and other characteristics similar to the subject. Tot L't 24 S1 Becker' Snuffy's Landing- * ` Hasty Enfield b r e Lake Maria Silver Craeke State Park Land Sale 1 Maple Lake Muni Airport al - — 4 7 Sand Dunes i.................................. w. 70 � �E�agc{'ee :F a Irk ..� 1 .I • 24 ...Salida Pn;.a '11 p } a �Parf:- Prdrrl eadows Park III 1 '- BI Lake—�--- — --••__ --___- - -- Land Sale 2 13 ' Corneliu armorial Park iveFpla¢k— np -T • nd Sale 5 :. Iv Elk � ........................ '..Mississippi Oaks Park La 5 a Buffalo Municipal Hanover Park }Airport d Ra=at 35 is 1 F,'odca Hills:. Park ; 2D 6*\77� • Hettc-n,r 6.er Parr• ,F>' ckford wavarly. _ Cdke Rebecca_ '..I HeigF.rts Park 83 and Sale 3 42 58 1 riville ::�.. 36 - Land Sale 4 --- 241 144 _ _�...• .,. e�nin9'Mlil�-- Diaawnd Dayt n �: ` \ ss lake`', rw-HaGaOowa Park mMy Pa�.............,1 Rogers 203 121 J M1 a. 117 11a' - - r 'Jj109t 81 Ll4- d� M o Pa k E N IN E,P I Page 42 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sale Comparison Approach — Continued Sale Comparable 1 Aerial Image Address: XXXX Deegan Avenue, Monticello '!'lid- • t .. - x r — 414 s .. 1fcC��•.� ,r V r -. '4 , .. _ RN r i The land sale is indicated by the red arrow. Surrounding uses include a movie theater, Walmart, and other commercial. In the greater area is future development land and single-family residential. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 43 I Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Property Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #1 Redfo ��dSale 1 0 XXXX Deegan Avenue, Monticello 155-176-001020 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 117,612 SF Improvements: None Commercial land parcel located along Highway 25. The property is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. Access to the site is via a backage road (no direct access to Highway 25). $930,440 July 21, 2021 Daniel Thomas Robbins City of Monticello Price /Acre: Sale Terms: Sale Conditions: Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $7.91 per SF Cash Typical RediComps, Costar / CREV Page 44 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 mod; - .�� Mississsiip"pi i Moose Sher�itt>' ,River Park c ' ._ Swan Park . Ecumen St. Benedict's > Community ---- thst Bondhus Cor St Henry Catholic Church , .a• ' I+ � '� -� 4 p M, a, s JtIeHome De.0 ♦ Ultimate 4F♦ ■ Undercoati ar halls u d �o�at,'"_n9 E 7th'St him�acie�, Elemts • w"�,_ SunnyDays Therapy �� ♦ RiuerWood a e Ban. i esota t ' W reless W • r Verizo naiology orize Retailer •,� enzon oriticello e" Do rar i g ♦ Maatrress Firrr j r2ends $ A� Faml'y Discount U� .► Pa�jit� 0 UM (Itra ` �� - Com anies Fleet Farm I•` M"chn,- I 'G�o Y p Monticello Baseball Park tticello •, , �/, w `O `son.MMont�ic•'elllot'Migh School # Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #2 Land Sale 2 APPr Dr 1 62�' fee Ra StF 1e 19 _ s \ oak A Property Data Address: XXXX 7th Street East, Monticello 155-212-001010 PID/Legal Description: Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Description: Average Utilities: Public Physical Characteristics: 67,147 SF Improvements: n/a Site Size: Commercial land located just south of Home Depot. The property has frontage and exposure to Comments: Interstate 94. The property has average development appeal. Sale Data Sale Price: $550,000 Price /SF: $8.19 per SF Sale/Close Date: August 30, 2022 Sale Terms: New Mortgage Buyer: MoCnticello 7th Street East LL Sale Conditions: Typical Seller: Ryan Companies US, Inc. Source/Verification: RediComps / CREV Comments: The property was listed on the open market. Page 46 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Tamis Daycare J Kali Ave NE ra ` a Z. ro ro 0 � —pd Kingston Cro �C r I > d w ZCL a" m NE 53rd St NE m _ 53rd St NE The Goddard5c'bl' o Albertville ( r car X N ' �., Pet Nation Veterinary • �' Care Center z c H g ' The Hen 8'The ,.. MEId, • l~ ' ;M SunnyDays Therapy, s _51stSt Orthodo tic tdk ♦' Parkway Dash Towing Se-, -e { Lira`1• y ...JJ7 .- Jason Ave NE 50th St NE n w Z M 0- i Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Proaerty Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #3 b St NE -- 6St NE 371 Gist $t ror.�'a" z Fark ay .4, „ ft 57th s St N c - Ave NE * oaVsiae Fares � 55th St NE Land Sale 3 53rd St NE d S[ NE p NE — Four seasons ' _: ParkJL IF L _ILJL°! �I 5292 Kyler Avenue Northeast, Albertville 101-137-001010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 61,463 SF Improvements: None Commercial land parcel located along County Road 19 (Labeaux Avenue Northeast). The property is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. Access to the site is via a backage road (no direct access to County Road 19). $449,000 January 12, 2024 Ortiz Properties LLC Cheney Properties LLC Price /SF: Sale Terms: Sale Conditions: Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $7.31 per SF New Mortgage Typical RediComps, MLS, CREV Page 48 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Roge s Pet'Clink ♦ Cub Roger !_ '+ otVC7 !. , Bedroc oto sue' M F rniture, � , � 4 North t_ Community Park r AngelrHand. ba 137.t Ave. Midwest Ur ent'Care--• co coerce eb The Preserve • a Commerce TwilightiTr�,� TGK A to o iive + o i Cnar ge Se vice limpE agi a ogers. ; „ , Fro 'Q 1 �•.r +� Maynard's l'o ,, Ha,� ,'j► ;, ,, fir. " �: •"' , � - Holidayinn Express & Suites < d Cafe z tQ - Q ort o'�T� • atr ry The Crown F�oo r f& rink- Hall Hampton Inn Suite_ s Roge s J *, * l e S Diamond Lake Rd r - - S Diamond a is r c ' ♦ RichardSl o� o Ca • D�n 's , d� T = °o � 34t A've P34$ d�ei , * �' • +L TA ravel GYeat N Eggi istribu 94 7' 96rs i i� INI 94 all O O �'. � _ ® �' .po9 ♦ 'Wn°�i,�e �v►.. �j. y`er "� Rye tal � '/ �I dill lyFrozen A� ��. y�•, . t'�.-:. ...:�F a A� 1 �ri a •"IFi� Cus�rd & Steakburgers Bi 1 Advanced 4- Tryou�Jalapeno A \ joy ResppOnS - stems i enes' GrOEBNEYRry \y�' - Ha, 'r,� refight To s� i Csorpo-ate Headquarters P _DI ♦S y .•, Rogers True value Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #4 Ibrth Community Park tttttt Nokh mmunity Feik 1 Il Land Sale 9 : , l.- l� _ -- -" n 48 52 i i •�' .• ■. t Property Data Address: 21035 135th Avenue N, Rogers PID/Legal Description: 14-120-23-41-0015 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Description: Average Utilities: Public Physical Characteristics: 32,670 SF Improvements: None Site Size: Comments: Commercial site that is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. The property is just east of Highway 101. Sale Data Sale Price: $392,040 Price /SF: $12.00 per SF Sale/Close Date: November 22, 2023 Sale Terms: Cash Buyer: Northland Salons Rogers Sale Conditions: Typical Owner LLC Seller: LHJery Incorporated Source/Verification: RediComps / CREV Comments: The property was listed on the open market. Page 50 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ' Fj t orl-FHaystationstore' Cad wash p -0 %r Circ e.K Polar Pop a 0ARO County Rtl 39 NE County Rtl 9 NE County Rd✓39tN 101 Market, • Coborn's,Groee Christ Churco h Otse o .7 • Store Ot' e / g ---i-- 89th'StNE CranyboA Lavenderr y ��• �• '^ Lades&tJ_-= m Vicki's Family Daycare lot , St NE_• • • ,i 1 w `—. et "�11 Great Clips _ Z �, .}•, Get the Cut You Love d • P c y' Lennar at Parrish �� a Mechanical • A Meadows, QaALDI • and Conlin L g F L Park, w � m edtherap.y� , r gym, i 8•,h,5 87tSI E— • � `� • TiresoPlus (Book An Oil 2 • B7thTLn :� C�en9e Appoi t a. M► Due N rthrCa Wash , n� - •• The Village of Ot'se�o . . w 85th+SNNE � 85th,StP&F Maehining,i' � EDCO Products, -Inc yc t •r • � ' g a� � •,,� � aaitnst A 111ff d pa ♦ CM . Curious Stars w f_ Coil care Center _ ► r' ;, . D a eb _ •i— Ida `� School no1liPark ♦ CP d^ , \�pve'NF ge and All Drywall- LifeGate Chyrc Service' 2 W Otsego Elementry Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Proaerty Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #5 x 92nd St NE Y� d pii I4 88th St NE Land Sale 5 - -- JL es - - 1011 79th 4 8690 Parkview Avenue, Otsego 118-360-027010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 98,445 SF Improvements: None Commercial site located just to the southwest of Target. Surrounding uses include commercial and residential. The site has average development appeal. $1,000,000 March 7, 2024 Price /SF: Sale Terms: Java Otsego Retail 2.0 LLC Sale Conditions: Tamarack Land - Parrish Source/Verification Meadows, LLC The property was listed on the open market. $10.16 per SF New Mortgage Typical RediComps / CREV Page 52 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Listed below is the adjustment grid for the comparables listed on the previous pages. Comparable items of significant difference are adjusted for. Description Subject 1 2 3 4 5 9234 )000( )000( 5292 21035 8690 Address State Highway25 NE Deegan Avenue 7th Street E Kyler Avenue NE 135th Avenue N Parkview Avenue Monticello Monticello Monticello Albertville Rogers Otsego Proximity Subject 0.21 mi SW 1.37 mi NE 7.96 mi SE 13.6 mi SE 11.5 mi E Financing Market Cash New Mortgage New Mortgage Cash New Mortgage Conditions Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Market Conditions -- Jul-21 Aug-22 Jan-24 Nov-23 Mar-24 Location Average Fair Fair Fair Good Average Zoning/Use Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Phys Char Average Average Average Average Average Average Improvements n/a None n/a None None None Size Age Condition Utilities Public Public Public Public Public Public Sale Price -- $930,440 $550,000 $449,000 $392,040 $1,000,000 Site Size (SF) 98,446 117,612 67,147 61,463 32,670 98,445 Price per SF - Site Size $7.91 $8.19 $7.31 $12.00 $10.16 Cond. Adj. +/- Financing Market Conditions Typical Market Conditions 5.37% 3.16% 0.42% 0.70% 0.12% Net Cond. Adj. 5.37% 3.16% 0.42% 0.70% 0.12% Effective $/SF - Site Size $8.34 $8.45 $7.34 $12.08 $10.17 Adjustments +/- Location Average 10% 10% 10% -10% Zoning/Use Commercial Phys Char Average Improvements n/a Utilities Public Site Size (SF) 98,446 -5% Net Adjustment 10% 10% 10% -15% 0% Adjusted Price per SF - Site Size $9.17 $9.29 $8.07 $10.27 $10.17 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 53 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Discussion of Adjustments Property Rights: Refers to the ownership interest conveyed at the time of sale. Properties with leases or other encumbrances in place can sell for more or less than comparable properties that sell fee simple interest. • All transactions were fee simple, no adjustment warranted. Financing: The impact financing may have had on the sale price, favorable interest rate or term. • All sales were cash or estimated to be near or at market rates. Conditions of sale: Reflects non -market conditions, which may or may not have impacted the sale price, such as differing motivations of buyer or seller (related parties, distressed or liquidation sale, listings, pending, occupancy, assemblage, etc.), impending eminent domain proceedings, influence due to tax ramifications, or lack of market exposure. • All transactions appear to be typical transactions, no adjustment warranted. Market Conditions: Based on a variety of data, the appraiser concludes to an annual appreciation rate of 2%. This rate is applied accordingly to the sales comparables. Location: This adjustment is based on the appraiser's judgment. It takes into consideration surrounding land uses, intended use, neighborhood characteristics, traffic, exposure and access. • Comparable 1 adjusted upward for circuitous access • Comparable 2 adjusted upward for less appealing location relative to the subject • Comparable 3 adjusted for less appealing location relative to the subject • Comparable 4 adjusted downward for superior location Zoning/Use: • The subject and comparables are rated similar, no adjustment. Physical Characteristics: Shape and topography adjustments reflect the market preference for mostly rectangular and level parcels, which optimize development potential. • The subject and comparables are rated similar, no adjustment. Page 54 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Improvements: • The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Utilities: • The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Site Size: Adjustments recognize larger parcels of land typically sell for less per SF than smaller sites. Comparables adjusted accordingly. • The adjustment is based on discussions with market participants as well as previously observed sales. Conclusion: The comparables used are rated to be the most indicative of data analyzed and bracket the subject value. Other sales reviewed were older, further and/or needed more adjustment. Adjustments are made on a per SF basis. The comparables utilized in this analysis each have several similar characteristics in common with the subject. While none are totally identical to the subject, each represents a viable alternative to a prospective buyer of the subject property and, after adjustment, can be utilized as an indicator of market value for the subject property. Indicator Un-adiusted Price per SF Range $7.31 - $12.00 Average $9.11 Median $8.19 Adiusted Price per SF $8.07 - $10.27 $9.40 $9.29 The comparables are given approximately equal weight. Considering the above data, the subject location, characteristics, quality, powerline easement, and the current market conditions, a value near the upper range is considered appropriate. Site Size (SF) 98,446 Indicated Value (land only) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Value per SF Total $10.00 $984,460 $985,000 (rnd.) Page 55 I RECONCILIATION Cost Approach Not Applied Sales Comparison Approach $985,000 Income Approach Not Applied The Cost Approach to value was not applied as the subject is being appraised as vacant land. The Direct Sales Comparison Approach to value analyzed recent sales of properties as compared with the characteristics of the subject property. Adjustments were made to the comparables to make them as similar to the subject as possible. This results in an indication of market value at which a typical buyer would be willing to pay for the subject property. Quality and quantity of data rated to be average. The Income Approach was not utilized due to limited rents and capitalization rates of properties similar to the subject. Conclusion: The Sales Comparison Approach is given the most weight. Data quantity and quality was rated to be average. Final Value Opinion (BEFORE) The value opinion is: $985,000 EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME Reasonable Exposure Time: Typically 12 months before Marketing Time Opinion: 12 months +/- after the effective the effective date of the appraisal. date of the appraisal. Page 56 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 AFTER ANALYSIS The neighborhood, site, regional, aerial, comparables, etc. descriptions are the same in the before as the after (unless otherwise noted on the following pages). The highest and best use of the site as vacant is for commercial development as market demand warrants and zoning allows. The highest and best use of the site as improved is not applicable. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 57 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Monticello is a reconstruction of School Boulevard. Per the city project website, the purpose of the project is to "Increase pedestrian safety and reduce potential conflict points along the School Boulevard corridor." Improvements include a new pedestrian crossing at the Meadow Oak Avenue and Fenning Avenue roundabout crossing Fenning Avenue, extension of the sidewalk in -front of Eastview Education Center connecting south to School Boulevard to help with bus drop-off and pick-up, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard at Pelican Lane, removal of pedestrian crossing on School Boulevard at Eider Lane, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard between Eider Lane and Fallon Avenue, improvements to the School Boulevard High School entrance to include right -turn channelization for vehicles exiting the parking lot and a refuge island for pedestrians, install radar feedback speed signs on School Boulevard, and extend trail on the south side of School Boulevard between Cardinal Hills Park and Fenning Avenue. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring new right-of-way, permanent easement, and temporary easements. Description of the acquisition areas and types: Right-of-Wav Acquisition (ROW): Used for right of way related purposes (road construction, ponding, etc.). The city will acquire this area in fee; the property owner does not retain any ownership rights. The city reported the following ROW for the project. Site Size — Before 1 98,446 SF Acquisition Area — ROW 1 0 SF Site Size - After 1 98,446 SF Permanent Easement: The easement area is used for sidewalk/trail purposes. The subject owner remains the underlying owner of the area. The city reports the following for permanent easement area: Total Permanent Easement 1,926 SF Page 58 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Project Description — Continued Temporary Easement: Used for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. A market rate of return will be found for the time period that the temporary easement exists. Because the owner retains ownership of the temporary easement area, it is not applicable to subtract it as a loss from the "Before" site size. For the specific subject parcel, it appears that the sloping after the project will be similar to the sloping before the project with minimal changes. However, because changes can occur during actual construction, the appraiser reserves the right to reconsider damages if the slope exceeds 1 to 4 in the after condition. The temporary easement length is anticipated to last 20 months. Temporary Easement Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 1,744 SF Page 59 I CamplfngWorld • Middle�hool +- oo Seamle'ssGutters Save bDlT040 T�/ o_ own9�� t r \ �i Missisipi sp �� _ - 94 River Park � 1\ f y i Ond Bus.CompanSt Henr7l? tholic.Church, Yct.1 _ _.. �•.� �Uklrr�iate , Jiffy Lube + The HomeDe° Unr! •—tin _ i Polaris MCO .S$D Off At 4 y �,Un. ee C - Target Y 1w reI iz Y '':......:a. UMC i unF, SERVPRO o Flee. Fans 81 oust r J _ y ALDI' ! ` Rf w. .40 Monticello Igh°Schooi `' 1� Shop YOU' Local ALDI -1- - I t R �� - 1 t P ; J - LIttIe Mountain,, t T he °Elementary" ,.;.,��.JaRIISCII A, Gv Ity I it or rview, dun tain Y : ' Bike Challenge Cours r, Pioneer park r 1 r 1 Painting, LLC-Minneapolis.TheisensMobile• yr �•- McOaniC - f Hey Girl Beauty Co,_ * i •" c -: sneered, ` • �i•.• ,+ The Bouncy House Gureen y, , 9 inc S. v j� � ��' ; � • ' Ball Engraving-, 'Montice, llo Townsh�HaII lip • - ' ry r Nw Z SKETCH OF ACQUISITION A J=YN ee Easement Exhibit r r City of Monticello .�. e /y � I Property Owner: SB 24, LLC / PIN$ 155148001010 v"pose4 vm 9ze sF 1. 9234 STATE HWY 25 NE me - Easement Tem— 5F _M-T-V Haka. son 'Anderson °aim x.cf ,� � zu- - -oszo Right of Way and ` Easement Exhibit � The proposed right-of-way acquisition is outlined in red. The city indicates the proposed right-of-way acquisition is 0 SF. The new permanent easement area is outlined in blue. The city indicates the permanent easement is 1,926 SF. The new temporary easement area is outlined in green. The city indicates the temporary easement is 1,744 SF. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 61 I PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA Acquisition Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Acquisition Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Page 62 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE Potential aspects of damage or loss in value to the subject property caused by the partial acquisition: - Land within the acquired area - Buildings located within the acquired area - Site improvements within the acquired area - Severance damage, the influence of the acquisition area on the subject property - Project Influence Land - Land value breakdown -- On the basis that all portions of the subject site have equal value contribution the subject's land value in the taking area is diminished by the pro -rated value of the land acquired. Buildings — There are no building improvements in the acquisition area. Site improvements — Based on an inspection, see below chart for site improvements, if any, that are impacted by the acquisition. The city will move and/or replace in kind any wells, septic systems, underground watering systems, and fences as needed. Site Improvements Description Type/Size/Condition Quantity/Rate Total Opinion of Market Value Trees None $0 Plantings None None None None None $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Driveway/Fence Underground Watering System Sign TOTAL $0 Note: The city is to maintain access to the subject during the project period. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 63 Aspects of Potential Damage — continued Severance damage — Given the current site layout and use, there is no severance damage to the remainder as a result of the acquisition. It is the appraiser's opinion the proposed acquisition as described in this report will not have an adverse effect on the marketability or value of the remainder due to the acquisition. See chart below. Primary Factors Considered for Estimating Potential Severance Site Characteristics Before After Location Average Average Access Average Average Street Improvements Trail Ponding Utilities Elevation Drainage Retaining Wall Sound Wall Fence House/Building Proximity to Road/ROW, approximate Site / Development Appeal Highest and Best Use Dated to Average Asphalt and concrete along School Boulevard None Public Average Average None None None n/a Average Some new Asphalt and concrete along School Boulevard None Public Average Average None None None n/a Average Commercial development Commercial development Net Impact Nil Nil Benefit not considered Nil M kv Nil *Appraised value does not give consideration to any benefit to the subject as result of the proposed project. Severance Discussion: Based on the above chart analysis, there is no severance damage to the remainder. The highest and best use of the subject in the before and the after is considered to be the same. Project Influence - The subject will have reasonable and suitable access throughout the project. The proposed project is considered typical. An informed buyer/property owner is aware that any property is subject to occasional disturbances due to various projects over the course of time; such as road upgrades, utility improvements, other infrastructure maintenance, construction/razing of buildings, renovations to the noted property, etc. Page 64 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES ROW Acquisition: Acquired for road purposes. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 100% loss in value. The new ROW area is reported to be 0 SF. Permanent Easement Acquisition: The easement area is used for sidewalk/trail purposes. The new easement area is reported to be 1,926 SF. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 95% loss in value. Temporary Easement: Used by the city for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. The city reports that the temporary easement will be 1,744 SF. Summary of Acquisition Estimate of Value Before Acquisition Land Value $985,000 Site Improvements See below $0 Total Value BEFORE Acquisition $985,000 Estimate of Value After Acquisition Total Value Before Acquisition, Land Only & Improvements in Acquisition Area $985,000 Less: ROW Acquisition Area 0 SF x $10.00 per SF x 100% loss = $0 Prescriptive Easement Area 0 SFx$10.00per SF x100%loss = $0 Permanent Easement 1,926 SFx$10.00per SF x95%loss = ($18,297) Site Improvements None $0 Net Value Before Severance $966,703 Severance Total Value AFTER Acquisition Temporary Easement 1,744 TOTAL DAMAGES AND COSTS (rounded) None $0 Total Damages ($18,297) $966,703 SFx$10.00perSFx10%x20months = $2,907 Total Temporary Easement Cost ($2,907) $21,300 Alternate Computation ROW Acqusition Area 0 SF x $10.00 per SF x 100% rights loss= $0 Prescriptive Easement Area 0 SF x $0.15 per SF x 100% rights loss= $0 Permanent Easement 1,926 SF x $10.00 per SF x 100% rights loss= $18,297 Site Improvements None $0 Severance $0 Temporary Easement - Low Area 1,744 SF x$10.00 per SF x 10% x 20 months = $2,907 $2,907 Total (rounded) $21,300 "Slight deviations may exist due to rounding. EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME Reasonable Exposure Time: 12 months before the Marketing Time Opinion: 12 months +/- after the effective date of the appraisal. effective date of the appraisal. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 65 I DEFINITIONS MARKET VALUE - The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (A) buyer and seller are typically motivated, (B) both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (C) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market, (D) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (E) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition. Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — The right to use another's land for a stated purpose. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — An interest in real property that conveys use but not ownership to a portion of a property. Common easements include but are not limited to access, utility, and right of way. Specialty easements include but are not limited to conservation, preservation, aerial, and flowage. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition. Appraisal Institute TEMPORARY EASEMENT (definition) — An easement granted for a specific purpose and applicable for a specific time period. A construction easement, for example, is terminated after the construction of the improvement and the unencumbered fee interest in the land reverts to the owner. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition. Appraisal Institute Page 66 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES Regarding any adverse environmental and/or improvement structural conditions (such as, but not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, mold, construction defects or inadequacies, etc.) present in the improvements, on the site, or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: None are apparent, however, appraiser is not an expert in this field. Value assumes no hazardous or structural conditions exist. Value assumes any abandoned wells will be properly sealed. If any of these conditions exist the appraised value could differ significantly. EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS As stated by USPAP; Extraordinary Assumption: An assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions of conclusions. None Hypothetical Condition: That which is contrary to what exists but is supposed for the purpose of analysis. Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 67 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. The appraisers assume no responsibility for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor do the appraisers render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership and good management. 2. The furnished legal description is assumed to be correct. 3. Any sketch in the report may show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraisers have made no survey of the property. It is assumed unless otherwise noted that no survey has been viewed and that all improvements are located within the legally described property. 4. The appraisers are not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made the appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. 5. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of value for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 6. The appraisers assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraisers assume no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering, which might be required to discover such factors. 7. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, radon gas, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 8. Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the appraisers, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, the appraisers can assume no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished to the appraisers. 9. Disclosure of the contents of the appraisal report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which the appraisers are affiliated. No part of the contents of this report, or copy thereof (including conclusions as to the property value, the identity of the appraiser, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organizations, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected), shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or any other public means of communications without the prior written consent and approval of the appraisers. Page 68 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Assumptions & Limiting Conditions — continued 10. The appraisers have no present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised; and neither the employment to make the appraisal, nor the compensation for it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property. The appraisers have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. 11. The appraiser has personally inspected the subject site (unless noted otherwise). The comparable sales data has been viewed via aerial maps, photographs and/or online street views along with file pictures, when available. To the best of the appraiser's knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this report are true and correct, and the appraisers have not knowingly withheld any significant information. 12. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The appraisal is for the sole use of the named client. 13. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of the property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider possible non-compliance with the requirements of ADA in estimating the value of the property. 14. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the reported analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report was prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 15. The appraised value opinion assumes all leases (if any) are current and paid in full as of the effective date of the appraisal. 16. Excel grids and tables may have slight deviations due to rounding, which may have a nominal impact on value. 17. The appraised value opinion assumes all formulas used in the Excel grids throughout the report are accurate. 18. Unless noted, value assumes no apparent adverse site, building or zoning issues or conditions. 19. Site and building sizes are based on public record, data services, client and/or appraiser measurement at the time of appraisal and are considered reliable, but not guaranteed. Actual sizes herein could vary if made by an engineer/surveyor/contractor. 20. If any of the above if found to be different, value could change. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 69 CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1) The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2) The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions. 3) 1 have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4) 1 have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5) My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6) My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7) My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8) The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Appraisal Institute's Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, which includes the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice. 9) William R. Waytas has made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. Ethan Waytas did not inspect the subject property. Ethan Waytas wrote and selected all the data in the report. William R. Waytas read the report, concurred with the findings, and then co -signed the report. 10) No one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. 11) In accordance with the competency provision USPAP, I have verified that my knowledge, experience and education are sufficient to allow me to competently complete this appraisal. See attached qualifications. 12) As of the date of this report, Ethan Waytas and William R. Waytas have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the appraisal institute. 13) The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representative. 14) We have not provided services as an appraiser regarding the subject property within the 3-year period immediately preceding acceptance to this assignment. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: see report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: see report Page 70 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER I hereby certify: I have personally inspected the property herein appraised and that the owner has previously been afforded the opportunity to accompany me during an inspection. Such opportunity was afforded to the owner/representative and said individual did not accompany me on the inspection. That to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements contained in the appraisal herein above set forth are true and the information upon which the opinions expressed therein are based as correct; subject to the limiting conditions herein set forth. That I understand that such appraisal is to be used in connection with an acquisition, and that such appraisal has been made in conformity with the appropriate State laws, regulations, policies and procedures applicable to appraisal of such purposes and that to the best of my knowledge no portion of the value assigned to such property consists of items which are non-compensable under the established State law. That in making this appraisal I have disregarded any increase or decrease in the before value caused by the project for which the property is being acquired. That neither my employment nor the compensation for making this appraisal and report are in any way contingent upon the value reported herein. That I have no direct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition of such property appraised. That I will not reveal the findings and results of such appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of the acquiring agency until authorized by agency officials to do so, or until I am required to do so, by due process of law, or until I am released from this obligation by having publicly testified as to such findings. That the conclusion set forth in this appraisal was reached without collaboration or direction as to value. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: See Report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: See Report Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 71 QUALIFICATIONS Appraisal Experience Presently and since 2006, Ethan Wavtas, MAI has been employed as an employee of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (10 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. He is currently a full time licensed certified general real estate appraiser, partner, and director of the company's IT department. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, cinema, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, lakeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO, subdivisions, and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Tax Appeal — variety of property types, including commercial, industrial, and multi -family. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Testimony -- Court, commission, arbitration, mediation, etc. testimony has been given Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #40368613 Holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute Education -- Graduate of the University of Minnesota: College of Science and Engineering, Twin Cities Campus Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, with distinction, 3.86 GPA. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Basic Appraisal Procedures -- Basic Appraisal Principles -- 2012-2013 15-Hour National Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice -- General Appraiser Sales Comparison Approach -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 1 -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 2 -- Advanced Income Capitalization -- General Appraiser Report Writing and Case Studies -- Real Estate Finance, Statistics and Valuation Modeling -- 2014-2015 7-hour National USPAP Update Course -- General Appraiser Site Valuation & Cost Approach -- Advanced Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use -- Advanced Concepts & Case Studies -- Quantitative Analysis Page 72 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Appraisal Experience Presently and since 1985, William R. Waytas has been employed as a full-time real estate appraiser. Currently a partner and President of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (11 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. Mr. Waytas was employed with Iver C. Johnson & Company, Ltd., Phoenix, AZ from 1985 to 1987. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, hotel, hotel water park, bed & breakfast, cinema, marina, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, lakeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Review — residential, commercial and land development. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - most appraisal experience is in the greater Twin Cities Metro Area (typically an hour from downtown metro). Numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #4000813. Appraisal Institute: SRA, Senior Residential Appraiser Designation, General Associate Member Employee Relocation Council: CRP Certified Relocation Professional Designation. International Right -Of -Way Association: Member HUD/FHA: On Lender Selection Roster and Review Appraiser DNR: Approved appraiser for Department of Natural Resources Testimony -- Court, deposition, commission, arbitration & administrative testimony given. Mediator -- Court appointed in Wright County. Committees -- President of Metro/Minnesota Chapter, 2002, Appraisal Institute. -- Chairman of Residential Admissions, Metro/MN Chapter, Al. -- Chairman Residential Candidate Guidance, Metro/Minnesota Chapter, Al. -- Elm Creek Watershed Commission, Medina representative 3 years. -- Medina Park Commission, 3 years. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 73 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Education -- Graduate of Bemidji State University, Minnesota. B.S. degree in Bus. Ad. -- During college, summer employment in building trades (residential and commercial). -- Graduate of Cecil Lawter Real Estate School. Past Arizona Real Estate License. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Course 101-Introduction to Appraising Real Property. -- Numerous Standards of Professional Practice Seminar. -- Fair Lending Seminar. -- Eminent Domain & Condemnation Appraising. -- Eminent Domain (An In -Depth Analysis) -- Property Tax Appeal -- Eminent Domain -- Business Practices and Ethics -- Scope of Work -- Construction Disturbances and Temporary Loss of Going Concern -- Uniform Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book Seminar) -- Partial Interest Valuation Divided (conservation easements, historic preservation easements, life estates, subsurface rights, access easements, air rights, water rights, transferable development rights) Commercial/Industrial/Subdivision Courses & Seminars -- Capitalization Theory & Techniques -- Highest & Best Use Seminar -- General & Residential State Certification Review Seminar -- Subdivision Analysis Seminar. -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (general) -- Advanced Income Capitalization Seminar -- Advanced Industrial Valuation -- Appraisal of Local Retail Properties -- Appraising Convenience Stores -- Analyzing Distressed Real Estate -- Evaluating Commercial Construction -- Fundamentals of Separating Real Property, Personal Property and Intangible Business Assets Residential Courses & Seminars -- Course 102-Applied Residential Appraising -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (residential) -- HUD Training session local office for FHA appraisals -- Familiar with HUD Handbook 4150.1 REV-1 & other material from local FHA office. -- Appraiser/Underwriter FHA Training -- Residential Property Construction and Inspection -- Numerous other continuing education seminars for state licensing & Al Speaking Engagements -- Bankers -- Auditors -- Assessors -- Relocation (Panel Discussion) Publications -- Real Estate Appraisal Practice (book): Acknowledgement -- Articles for Finance & Commerce and Minnesota Real Estate Journal Page 74 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Hakanson Anderson April 5, 2024 Walmart Real Estate Business TR. P. O. Box 8050 Bentonville, AR 72716 Main Office: 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763/427-5860 www.haa-inc.com Re: City of Monticello School Boulevard Improvements To Whom it May Concern: 45 4 This is a follow-up to our March 22, 2024 letter regarding the School Boulevard Improvement Project in Monticello, Minnesota. As discussed in our previous letter, the City of Monticello plans to reconstruct the intersections at School Boulevard and Cedar Street and School Boulevard and Edmonson Avenue. The four-way all stops will be replaced with roundabouts. As part of the project, the City will be requesting some new right-of-way and temporary easement on your property as shown on the attached Exhibit. Attached is the Appraisal Report prepared by Nagell Appraisal, Inc. The City is requesting your consideration of the appraised value of the right-of-way and easement as summarized in the report. The appraised value is $8,300. If you have any questions, please call or email Matt Leonard, the City's Public Works Director, at 763- 271-3271 (matt. leonard(aci.monticello.mn.us) or me at 763-852-0485 (Crai2J(ahaa-inc.com). Alternatively, you can contact the appraiser, Ethan Waytas, directly at: Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 12805 Highway 55 #300 Plymouth, MN 55441 952-544-8966 952-544-8969 fax Ethan@nagellmn.com Sincerely, Ilakanson Anderson I C, aig . R chum, Project Engineer cc: Matt Leonard, Public Works Director Ethan Waytas, Nagell Appraisal O/ i 4TH AD - �$N °F (� \ "'nON \ / n \ \ \ J\\ 1< DATE REVISION 02/07/24 Revise Riqht of Wav Easement/Revise Temporary Easement Easement Exhibit rj T" C-1 City of Monticello PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: A permanent easement for right of way purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 4TH ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota; lying Northerly and Northeasterly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 35 degrees 53 minutes 39 seconds West, assumed bearing along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 29.95 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 87 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 11.14 feet; thence South 79 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 17.46 feet; thence South 65 degrees 19 minutes 05 seconds East a distance of 32.15 feet; thence South 63 degrees 01 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 46.59 feet to the northeasterly line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating. PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 4TH ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota; lying Northeasterly, Northwesterly, and Northerly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 35 degrees 53 minutes 39 seconds West, assumed bearing along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 135.57 feet to a comer of said Lot 1; thence South 63 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds East along the Northeasterly line of Lot 2, said Block 1 a distance of 10.15 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 35 degrees 53 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 100.00 feet; thence North 78 degrees 36 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 22.63 feet; thence South 61 degrees 20 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 42.62 feet; thence South 52 degrees 33 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 224.49 feet; thence North 37 degrees 26 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet to the Northeasterly line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating. EXCEPT That part of said Lot 1 lying Northerly and Northeasterly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 35 degrees 53 minutes 39 seconds West, assumed bearing along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 29.95 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 87 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 11.14 feet; thence South 79 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 17.46 feet; thence South 65 degrees 19 minutes 05 seconds East a distance of 32.15 feet; thence South 63 degrees 01 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 46.59 feet to the northeasterly line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating. W Property Owner: WAL—MART REAL EST BUSINESS TR PIN# 155207001010 9320 CEDAR STREET WEEMMMIq Way = 1130Right SF of y 30 0 30 V1111A Proposed Temporary SCALE IN FEETEasement = 3407 SF I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared DFSMED 91': BP H k s o Anderson P a rce 1 2 SHEET by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly a a n n �)) Licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of nesota. DRAWN BY: JJ Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 I Right of Way and OF i ' - aEame: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 Easement Exhibit r�e lf� e erson Date 01/18/24 Li, No. 49138 BP www.haa_inaaom DATE 01/18/24 FILE NO. MO305 SHEETS Report Type Appraisal Report File # G2403013 - Parcel 2 Effective Date March 28, 2024 Prepared By: Ethan Waytas, MAI, Appraiser William R. Waytas, Appraiser Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 12805 Highway 55, Suite 300 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Tel:952.544.8966 1 Fax:952.544.8969 NAGELL APPRAISAL INCORPORATED 12805 Highway 55, #300 Plymouth, MN 55441 Established in 1968 City of Monticello Attn: Matt Leonard, Public Works Director, City of Monticello 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362 To Matt Leonard: Phone: 952-544-8966 Fax: 952-544-8969 April 5, 2024 In accordance with your request, an appraisal report has been made on the following described property: Subject Property: Walmart - Commercial 9320 Cedar Street Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 Described below is a summary of the appraisal report contained herein. Property Overview The City of Monticello is a reconstruction of School Boulevard. Per the city project website, the purpose of the project is to "Increase pedestrian safety and reduce potential conflict points along the School Boulevard corridor." Improvements include a new pedestrian crossing at the Meadow Oak Avenue and Fenning Avenue roundabout crossing Fenning Avenue, extension of the sidewalk in -front of Eastview Education Center connecting south to School Boulevard to help with bus drop-off and pick-up, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard at Pelican Lane, removal of pedestrian crossing on School Boulevard at Eider Lane, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard between Eider Lane and Fallon Avenue, improvements to the School Boulevard High School entrance to include right -turn channelization for vehicles exiting the parking lot and a refuge island for pedestrians, install radar feedback speed signs on School Boulevard, and extend trail on the south side of School Boulevard between Cardinal Hills Park and Fenning Avenue. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring new right-of-way, permanent easement, and temporary easements. The subject is improved with a single -occupant commercial building that is occupied by Walmart. County information indicates the building was constructed in 2004 and has 214,571 SF of gross building area. The gross site area is 1,171,328 SF. The proposed project was concluded to not impact the subject building improvements. Therefore, only the land and any site improvements in the acquisition area are analyzed to conclude to damages. This report reflects the data found and the opinions concluded from a before and after value appraisal of the subject property (land only). Intended Use Acquisition negotiation purposes by the city Intended User(s) City of Monticello iii Letter of Transmittal - Continued Extraordinary Assumptions None Hvpothetical Conditions Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Propertv Riqhts Appraised - Fee Simple Interest: The subject is used for commercial purposes. Given the scope of the assignment, the appraisal reflects the fee simple interest. Property Components Appraised - Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. - Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment (FF&E): The appraised value does not include personal property or FF&E. - Business Value: The appraised value does not include business value. Hiqhest and Best Use Conclusions - As Vacant: Develop with a commercial use if the site was vacant. - As Improved: Not applicable given the scope of the assignment. Valuation Methodoloqv Given the nature of the project, only the land is being appraised and any site improvements in the acquisition area. • Before Value: The before condition reflects market value before the proposed acquisition. • After Value: The after value reflects the property after the acquisition which considers any changes in site size, new easements, loss of any site improvements, and/or any severance damages to the remainder (if appropriate). • Temporary Easement: A fair rate of return the property owner should receive for use of the temporary easement area during the easement period, if any. 1V Letter of Transmittal — Continued The property is legally described herein. The appraisal assumes that the property meets all current environmental standards. The appraisal analysis and conclusions are subject to certain limiting conditions and assumptions described herein. The final value opinion, as of March 28, 2024, is: Before Market Value (land value): $4,685,000 After Market Value (land value): $4,678,980 DAMAGES DUE TO ACQUSITION: $6,020 Temporary Easement Cost: $2,271 TOTAL (damages plus temporary easement cost): $8,300 rnd. Exposure Time / Marketina Time Final values reflect "market exposure" time of 12 months before the effective date Exposure Time: of the appraisal. Changes in the market, use, lease and/or building subsequent to the effective appraisal date could impact value. Marketing Time: I Marketing times for appropriately priced properties is generally 12 months +/-. Our company has 10 employees, has been in business since 1968 and has sufficient knowledge, education, experience, resources and/or contacts to competently complete this assignment. The accompanying report contains data secured from my personal investigation and from sources considered to be reliable; however, correctness is not guaranteed. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements contained in this report are true and correct. Neither my employment to make this appraisal, nor the compensation, is contingent upon the value reported. This report has been prepared in conformity with the code of professional ethics and standards of professional appraisal practice of the Appraisal Institute and appraisal standards set forth by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Please contact us if you have further questions. Sincerely, �i Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 www.nagelimn.com William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 V TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS ....................... VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY .................... INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL .................................................... DATE OF APPRAISAL............................................................................. SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT .................................................. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED.......................................................... PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED ............................................. IDENTIFICATION..................................................................................... REAL ESTATE TAXES............................................................................ SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY .............................................. REGIONAL DATA..................................................................................... REGIONAL MAP...................................................................................... CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION ............................................. NEIGHBORHOOD MAP........................................................................... SURROUNDING USES............................................................................ BEFORE ANALYSIS................................................................................ SITE DESCRIPTION................................................................................ ZONINGMAP........................................................................................... ZONING.................................................................................................... FUTURE LAND USE MAP....................................................................... FLOODMAP............................................................................................. AERIAL / PLAT MAP................................................................................ TOPOGRAPHYMAP............................................................................... WETLAND MAP....................................................................................... SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS.................................................................... HIGHEST AND BEST USE...................................................................... COSTAPPROACH................................................................................... INCOME APPROACH.............................................................................. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH....................................................... RECONCILIATION................................................................................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME .................................................. AFTER ANALYSIS................................................................................... PROJECT DESCRIPTION....................................................................... PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP.................................................................... SKETCH OF ACQUISITION..................................................................... PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA ............................................ ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE ..................................................... SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES .................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME .................................................. DEFINITIONS........................................................................................... ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES ........................................ EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ...................................... CERTIFICATION...................................................................................... CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER.............................................................. QUALIFICATIONS.................................................................................... .. 7 .. 8 .. 8 .. 8 .. 9 10 10 11 11 12 13 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 40 40 41 58 58 59 60 62 63 64 65 67 67 68 69 69 70 72 73 74 SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS Location: Project: Parcel Number: Appraisal Report: Current Use: Extraordinary Assumptions Hypothetical Conditions: Site Area: Building Improvements: Current Zoning: Highest & Best Use: Personal Property: Property Rights Appraised: Right of Way Acquisition: Existing Prescriptive Area Permanent Easement: Temporary Easement Temporary Easement Length: TOTAL DAMAGES & COSTS: 9320 Cedar Street, Monticello School Boulevard 2 Appraisal Report Commercial No, see rear of report for standard assumptions Yes, see rear of report 1,171,328 SF (26.89 acres) Commercial building, constructed in 2004, gross building area of 214,571 SF B-3, Highway Business (guided RC, Regional Commercial) Future commercial development No personal property included Fee Simple 1,130 SF None None 3,407 SF 20 months: April 1, 2024 to December 1, 2025 $8,300 rounded Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 7 VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY Type of Value: This report provides an opinion of Market Value. Condition of Value: This report provides an opinion of the as -is value. Occupancy: The subject is improved with a commercial building. INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL The client intends to use the appraisal for acquisition negotiation purposes. No party, other than the named client and listed intended users, may use or Intended Use: rely upon any part of this report without the prior written authorization of both the named client and the appraiser. This report is not valid unless it contains the original signatures in blue ink. Any unauthorized third party relying upon any portion of this report does so at its own risk. Intended User(s): City of Monticello DATE OF APPRAISAL Effective Date Inspection Date Date of Report March 28, 2024 March 28, 2024 April 5, 2024 Page 8 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT USPAP defines Scope of Work as: The type and extent of research and analyses in an assignment. For each appraisal, appraisal review and appraisal consulting assignment, an appraiser must: 1) Identify the problem to be solved, 2) Determine and perform the scope of work necessary to develop credible assignment results; and 3) Disclose the scope of work in the report. 1) I Provide a reasonably supported value opinion as it relates to the intended use & scope. Per assignment request (retained in workfile), the following degree of research and analysis has 2) been made. The narrative format used is an Appraisal Report, which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2a of USPAP. See individual approaches for further detail. The scope of work for this appraisal includes: a) Property Identification: Public record, plat maps, zoning maps and aerial photographs were used to identify the subject property. b) Property Inspection: A viewina of the subiect property and neiahborhood by the appraiser. Physical factors: Based on property viewing and conversations with the client, city and county officials. Lot size is based on county information. Economic Factors: Consisted of gathering of information from market experts, city and/or county offices, and internet about the region, community, neighborhood, zoning, utilities, and any pending projects in the area that may affect the subject property. • c) Extent of Data Researched: Sales data of competing properties within the subject 3) market area were given primary consideration. The most relevant data is used in this report. Sources include, appraiser data files, assessor, internet, developers, agents, MLS, periodicals, in -office library, etc. In addition, during the course of appraisal practice and of this appraisal process, the appraiser has had ongoing discussions with market participants (buyers, sellers, property managers, real estate agents/brokers, appraisers, etc.) and/or viewed market data in relation to how the current real estate market may impact the subject value. The appraiser has not researched the title or ownership records. • d) Type and Extent of Analysis Applied at Opinions or Conclusions: An extensive review of market data was performed. The most recent, similar and proximate data has been used. The data used will be adjusted on a grid. Reasonable and appropriate collection, verification, analysis and viewing has been performed in the valuation approaches, given the purpose and intended use of the report. A final value opinion will be discussed and correlated. The data used was obtained from sources considered credible, yet its accuracy is not guaranteed. If found otherwise, value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 9 I PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED What is valued in a real property appraisal is an estate subject to specified interests. Therefore, an appraiser's task is to identify not only the estate (e.g., the fee simple estate, the leasehold estate, the leased fee estate, the life estate) but also the interests associated with the real estate, such as leases, easements, restrictions, encumbrances, reservations, covenants, contracts, declarations, special assessments, ordinances, or other interests of a similar nature. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15tn Edition, Page 59) Fee Simple Interest: Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 71" Edition) Note: This would typically reflect an owner -occupied property. When the property rights appraised are the unencumbered fee simple interest of the real estate, the appraised value is subject to normal easements for drainage, public streets and utilities, if any. The effect of any existing mortgage or delinquent taxes on the subject property has not been considered in this appraisal. Leased Fee Interest: The ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7t" Edition) In appraisal practice, the lessor's interest in a property is considered a leased fee regardless of the duration of the lease, the specified rent, the parties to the lease, or any of the terms in the lease contract. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, Page 62) Conclusion of Rights Appraised: The subject is currently used for commercial purposes (Walmart). Given the scope of the assignment, the fee simple interest will be applied. PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. The methods utilized for the real estate valuation include: • Sales Comparison Approach FF&E: The appraised value does not include any values of fixtures, furnishings and equipment. Business Value: There is no business value included in the appraised value. Page 10 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 IDENTIFICATION Address: County PID Legal: Fee Owner: Census Tract #: 9320 Cedar Street Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 155-207-001010 SECT-14 TWP-121 RANGE-025 MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 4TH LOT-001 BLOCK-001 Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust 1002.06 REAL ESTATE TAXES Taxes, per County Records Payable 2023 Payable 2024 Total Effective Tax $256,008 $274,802 Special Assessments / Solid Waste Fee / $0 Other Total Tax & Assessments: $256,008 $274,802 Delinquent taxes: None noted COUNTY ASSESSOR'S VALUE Payable 2023 Payable 2024 Land $3,760,700 $5,102,200 Building $6,219,300 $6,300,000 TOTAL $9,980,000 $11,402,200 The subject tax ratio is 2.41%. The assessed value and taxes shown above reflect the overall property. The appraised value given in this report assumes any/all special assessments, and/or liens are paid in full and that there are no delinquent taxes, fees, payments, association dues, etc. Should it be found that any of these exist the amount should be deducted from the appraised value. Appraiser did not research these items; typically, a title search would reveal any of these. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 11 SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY Listing History: I The subject does not appear to be currently listed for sale. Sale Price: n/a Sale Date: n/a Buyer. n/a Seller: n/a Sales History: Terms: n/a Source: Public records No reported sales of the subject within the past 3 years. Pending Sale: I None noted or reported. The subject is improved with a single -occupant commercial building that is Building History: occupied by Walmart. The structure was built in 2004 and has a total building area of 214,571 SF, per public records. Lease History: I None provided or apparent Leasehold Interest: I None noted Association Dues: The subject is reportedly not part of an association or common interest community (CIC). Page 12 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL DATA Metro Area Regional hub Minneapolis -Saint Paul is the most populous urban area in Minnesota and is composed of 186 cities and townships. Built around the Mississippi, Minnesota and St. Croix rivers, the area is also nicknamed The Twin Cities for its two largest cities, Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Saint Paul is the second largest city in Minnesota, as well as the state capital. The area is part of a larger U.S. Census division named Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI, the country's 16th-largest metropolitan area, composed of eleven counties in Minnesota and two counties in Wisconsin. This larger area, in turn, is enveloped in the U.S. Census combined statistical area called Minneapolis -St. Paul -St. Cloud, MN -WI with an estimated population of 3.65 million people in 2019. In both of the fully developed central cities —Minneapolis and St. Paul —the population has declined due to smaller household sizes, yet growth in other areas of their counties has been more than offsetting. Below is detailed where this growth has occurred: POPULATION Census Census Forecast Growth Growth County 2000 2010 2022 2000 - 2010 2010-2022 total annual total annual Hennepin 1,116,200 1,152,425 1,260,121 3.25% 0.32% 9.35% 0.78% Ramsey 511,035 508,640 536,413 -0.47% -0.05% 5.46% 0.46% m Dakota 355,904 398,552 443,341 11.98% 1.20% 11.24% 0.94% m N Anoka 298,084 330,844 368,864 10.99% 1.10% 11.49% 0.95% c Washington 201,130 238,136 275,912 18.4% 1.84% 15.86% 1.32% d Scott 89,498 129,928 154,520 45.17% 4.52% 18.93% 1.58% Wright 89,986 124,700 148,003 38.58% 3.86% 18.69% 1.56% v Carver 70,205 91,042 110,034 29.68% 2.97% 20.86% 1.74% 0' Sherburne 64,417 88,499 100,824 37.38% 3.74% 13.93% 1.16% U) Chisago 41,101 53,887 57,988 31.11% 3.11% 7.61% 0.63% Total 2,837,560 3,116,653 3,456,020 1 9.84% 0.98% 10.89% 0.91% Overall, the area has experienced moderate to good income growth. Annualized income growth of 2.5% to 4.0% is consistent with national averages. MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME Census Estimate Growth County 2010 2022 2010-2022 total annual Hennepin 59,236 92,595 56.32% 4.69% M Ramsey 50,136 78,108 55.79% 4.65% m Dakota 69,508 101,360 45.82% 3.82% y Anoka 65,771 95,782 45.63% 3.80% Washington 77,239 110,828 43.49% 3.62% Scott 77,314 118,268 53.00% 4.41% v Wright 66,833 102,980 54.09% 4.51% c Carver 80,173 116,308 45.07% 3.76% ti Sherburne 69,971 96,889 38.47% 3.21 % Chisago 63,810 97,446 52.71 % 4.39% Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 13 Regional Data — continued Economic Trends The current residential interest rates for a typical 30-year mortgage are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Commercial rates are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Rates are expected to increase to combat inflation. New construction labor costs have steadily increased along with material costs as well, however during the COVID-19 pandemic costs increased drastically due to supply chains not being able to meet demand. Overall, construction costs are at all-time highs. New construction of commercial, industrial, and multi -family is occurring, however, limited office new construction is occurring. Listing prices have been increasing steadily since 2012 +/- and are starting to approach peak levels similar to the market in 2006, which was a period of high seller expectations. However, recent buyer and seller expectations regarding value and list prices appear to be trending towards equilibrium. Although well diversified, the TCMA and surrounding Minnesota economy is not immune to the recent soft/declining trends of the overall economy. k,20 Minnesota Index 0n20 Grc-20 324 32.8 137,1 Ynl] 1.111 Irby 11 Ap, 11 13A.I 1i9,S 110.7 111.S MY 21 tun 11 1.2.3 111.I 4111 A.S 21 1�3,6 144.5 Sg21 IAS,S %Ch.W Man MaM As. 0.7 Yan As. 9.9 Sep2013 S,p2020 S2021 U. S. Index Sp10 II2.9 OR-20 12" ri 124.3 0-20 12" A-21 125A Rb21 12SS M7-21 11" Apr-21 126S MP21 117s P-21 127.9 AA21 12M.9 A339.21 129A SAy21 129.9 %0.W Man MaA A@. 0.4 Y—No 5,3 Source: Minnesota DEED The recent COVID-19 pandemic created a significant drop in the economy due to high unemployment and decreased spending in early 2020. However, spending has increased, employment is recovering, and the COVID-19 vaccines have given markets stability. Page 14 Regional Data — continued EMPLOYMENT & LABOR FRED — Unemployment Rate in Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI (MSA) — Unemployment Rate in Minnesota Unemployment Rate I50 iro7A 10.0 f 7.5 - a 5-0 2.5 00 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1995 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Shaded areas indicate U.S. recessions. Source- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics fred.stlouisfed.org Over the past ten years, unemployment rates have gone from a peak of around 9.0% to near historical lows of around 2% in late 2018. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created a significant spike in the unemployment rate. The most recent data, shown below, indicates that the rate has dropped significantly and is approaching 2019 levels. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 15 Regional Data — continued APARTMENT MARKET Vacancy & Market Asking Rent Per Unit 8.0% Fvecest E1.900 7.5% $1,800 7.0% $1,700 g 8.5% $1,600 8y 60% $1, 500 S 55% $1 d00 5.0% $1,300 l.6% $1 " l.0% $1.100 3.5% I I3 I 1� I 1, 16 1J I 19 19 A I 11 171 13 74 I 2e 15 ?! I 61.000 ■ Vecancv %. N 4 'Mel rienU. � i .,11I .11 Sd aay Mrn>•m i.. Yu70!) CoStar reports that rents have been trending upward consistently for the past 10+ years. The current average asking rate for an apartment unit in the Twin Cities Metro is around $1,398 per month. Vacancy has fluctuated, but was trending downward until 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a spike in vacancy, which has since been declining. However, vacancy is higher due to significant new construction, both in Minneapolis and surrounding suburbs. The following chart shows the annual absorption of apartment units: Absorption Units 5 9 3K s 2KW 0 J�� Costar attar cnev l.w.a.,.a ec. r1am11 Page 16 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued RETAIL MARKET Vacancy Rate \cr Askiii.,4 Hale l n Itr( 4ul'lructfun V L5% O $19.06 per sq. ft. 28,000 sq. ft. Figure I Direct Vacancy Rote and Absorption 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 (200,000) (400,000) �Abwrption Vacancy Sour(e. (BRE Research, Nl 2021 Nct Ah%orplinn 2131771 sq. h. 9 B 7 6 5 d 3 2 1 0 CBRE indicates that current retail vacancy rates have been increasing and asking rent rates have been declining. There has been absorption of vacant space in the market, however, many developers are cautious about new retail construction. Strong locations retain typical demand; more speculative retail construction generally does not occur. Similarly, Cushman & Wakefield also shows stagnating retail asking rents and increasing vacancy R E_ % T R 4 T � �27 S26 2016 2017 201E �Askng Rent S PSF Dyed Vacancy Rate O% 2020 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 17 Regional Data — continued OFFICE MARKET CBRE data shows that asking rents for the overall office market have generally been increasing. This has also corresponded with an increase in vacancy rates as well. With the COVID-19 pandemic, many employers and workers realized that working remotely was a viable option. It is anticipated that many more companies will offer remote work full-time or part-time; this could impact office space as companies need less square footage. The counterpoint, however, is that companies might retain the same space and create social distancing opportunities in case of possible future COVID-19 flare-ups. FIGURE a Historical Vacancy Rates vs Asking Rates Vacancy Rate 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Avg Asking Rate (NNN) $18.50 $18.00 $17.50 $17.00 $16.50 $16.00 $15.50 $15.00 $10.50 $30.00 �p171 �'I'll �D.y'L 'C$ o% C` Downtown Vacancy Suburban Vacancy Downtown Asking Rate -Suburban Asking Rate Source CBRE Research 01 20M_ FIGURE 4: Historical Downtown Vacancy by Class Vacancy Rate 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 032019 0120v 03vv 0., 03202, 012022 0' 2Zov 012023 -Class A -Class B -Class C Suurue: CBRE Re urn^ 012723 FIGURE 5. Historical Suburban Vacancy by Class Vacancy Rate 36% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 032pt9 0,2p20 032p20 C Z02ti 037o 0" 2022 032022 0� 20 L3 -Class A -Class B -Class C Source CBRE Re earcr,. 012023 Page 18 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued INDUSTRIAL MARKET The industrial market nationwide has seen increases in rental rates and occupancy. Construction costs have been increasing as well, due to shortages created by the COVID-19 pandemic. In Minnesota the trend is similar to the country overall, vacancy has decreased, construction of new buildings is significant, CBRE indicates that vacancy has been dropping, construction starts have increased, and absorption is significant: RGURE 1: Quarterly and Annual Net Absorption vs. Vacancy Net Absorption Vacancy (MSF) 10 7% 9 6% 8 7 5% 6 5 4% 4 3% 3 2 2% 1% 0 — 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Oy, �01 �02 �03 04 —Vacancy Rate �aurce.CBRE Research 012023 Speculative development, per CBRE, has been significant. For example, almost 5,538,000 million square feet of speculative construction occurred in 2021/2021; of this, 9% has been leased. Buildings in 2022 are about 61% leased. It appears the market is supporting speculative industrial development at this time. =IGURE 3: Deliveries, Absorption. and Availability Rate for Speculative Construction SF (000's) 30 35% 25 30% 25% 20 20% 1s 15% 10 10% 5 lid �� Ii 1111A l 5% 0 I)% y� ti� ti� .� , .,O 10 ti0 ,ti'ti ti7 ti~ ,tit titi titi -0, tiL ti� ti0 ti0 10 ti0 ti0 LO 10 ti0 10 10 If, .ti0 ,ti0 10 If, ,ti0 LO O1 d9 O�' O° O1 d1 O�' Op Oti O� C� Cp dti O� C� Cp d~ Spec Deliveries Spec Absorption Spec Availability Rate Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 19 Regional Data — continued Cushman & Wakefield also reports decreasing vacancy rates and significant increases in asking rates for industrial space. OVERALL VACANCY & ASKING RENT le 6P aaaaa� As. r - ?ent a r-- r t� 8% 4% rry Rabe Total construction and absorption has been generally stable, but in 2021 there was significantly more absorption than construction. This would imply there is demand for more industrial space. SPACE DEMAND !DELIVERIES a. 6 N 4 i 2 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 YTD 2023 ■Net Ansorpbon. SF ■Construction Completors SF Page 20 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL MAP St. Stephen ror,, 23 n 'Braham West Sweden N T 0 N St.Wemd6 — MILL LAC 65, Rush CRY: Stanchfield Trade Lake eric Frederic Sartell 25 )n Springy.l.. . . . ....... .. .. . ........ Ncollegeville F 3vdz 05 Wyanett Harris P 0 ,t,lo'� SI,Ci,"d P Luck ..... ........ ........... ........... . . ...... Cambridge* ..... ... ... St C.. I S A N T I Eureka Milltown Spencer Bradford Eta h. Center Or ook Isanti _"tsokp 0 ockvilleE Augusta R B U R N E Orrock 'C.rduria 'Oalsai .4 learwal Taylors I Lake Beck•er ................... .......... . P St Francis ............. Falls C nt ity a er CRY c Llnclstror�� East Bethel Dresser Subject Chisago City gill M• M cello Blk River' Oak Oro Vvyo mki ve �sceola 2�) Annandale Otsego A N 0 'Forest Lake A W I S W R 1 0 _s H T bertylle Ramsey vile East oillinclover Maple Lake' lot!., Farmington t CRY St. Michael o9pr 4 Albion Center Buffalo Ch—plin. Coon Rapid. is I Star Prairie E R I h :North 0"k, Lake Stanton Beine' CentervilleHugo Fork Crow onoSomerset L.k. Park ef Y\Ihft. Bear Darwin Corcoran Brooklyn Park, Beach N.,. Richmond _ Cokedo Rockford Maple Groveu Brooklyn Fridl Shorev vir Dassel Waverly_ M I-N N E S 0 T A C.rd.,. WASHINGTON Sill Howard Lake :* Lake Sarah He. Brighton EY Mahlomedi Ne,,illHope Oak Park Heights S T. C -1 8 JW, Delano loolependen- ]� . . 8 140 h St. Paul _R Crystal Cry fis Pwoutte L Fn, on Hek Orono gil gW-- ood, Elmo E�ypo`rt Roberts Hudson Hammond. .... ......... Ill .. ........................... ...... a ate _C 'a Long Lake a st ,�dc 0.kdall�e V ey Minne polls akelan Wristed ordeal St. Paid Spring Park IlAnnialtordea. Loul Perk IfoWbiodloury .Silver Lake _.Hollywood H. in., �p Afton Minn6trls!W Deephaven' W_ st, Lester Prairie 7�—n..on d woo din. Lake; Shorewood 169 , . . I S-thst.p.ul J: lli� endQt. nir C N Rwhfiis j N Id , I .............................. Chanhassen I Cottage don, rairee River Falls M C L 0 D Waconia 1 cm C A R V E R 4-1 i-2-12- Blo ington, "Eagan brillowpee.. Heights Glencoe 1 America. _ D. Burnsville Creek sairage . Appl� Valloy H-ting . s Ares P I E R C E Hamburg Prior Trimbelle Ellsworth Lake N AuoUrn 36, , ................ Lakeville L, 1:1 T A Jor dan rL - Helena Farmington Arlington alle Plane I 21i Cedar Lake Trenton Bay City S I B L E S C 0 T T 109 19 'Gaylord Rock 20 Red Wing Henderson�,- en de, ............ Cestle ... ....... ... Webster Lansdale i 1 3 1 Gannon Cannon Falls ueur as .............................. .......... 10 0 0 0 D H U E Wheatland Lafayette .1--ington 'Mordg* ornery I 5si Goodhue N I C 0 L L E T Le Carter 1131 L E S u E UA R��C .......... S t I. Peter Cleveland; Cannon City State .Mascta Wn. W�E Farib@uK Zumbrota Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 21 CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Type of neighborhood: Outlying Suburban Northwestern Community Percent built-up: 90% developed (within city limits) Stage of Development: Stable with growth Neighborhood boundaries: City Limits Redevelopment Some new development and updating are occurring Major Transportation: Interstate 94, Highway 25 Single Family Residential 65% Two- & Multi -Family 10% Predominant type & conformity: Commercial/Industrial 15% Other/Vacant/Public Land 10% Total: 100 % Typical property age: New to 75+ years, predominant under 30 years Single -Family Home Sales: $125,000 to $400,000+ Apartment Sales: $40,000 to $80,000+ per unit Office Property Sales: $75 to $125+ per SF Retail Property Sales: $100 to $200+ per SF Industrial Property Sales: $40 to $80+ per SF Capitalization Rates: 7-10% Historic Subject Market: Stable, some growth Neighborhood Trend: Stable, some growth Detrimental influences: No major apparent Area / City: Monticello is located about 45 minutes northwest of Downtown Minneapolis and 40 minutes southeast of St. Cloud. Access to Interstate 94 is conveniently located near the subject parcel. Interstate 94 provides direct access to the Twin Cities Metro Area, St. Cloud, and surrounding communities. Monticello has a reputation as a stable community, with nearby shopping and access to many major roadways. Access to Downtown and surrounding communities is considered average. Major shopping and commerce are located within the City of Monticello. Neighborhood: The subject is located in southern Monticello near the Highway 25 corridor. Surrounding uses include commercial, residential, and future development land. Page 22 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 City & Neighborhood Description — continued Subject City: As of the 2010 census the population was 12,759, in 2000 it was 7,868. This represents a net increase of 62.2% from 2000 to 2010. The 2020 population for the city is 14,455, an increase of 13.3% from 2010. The 2022 population estimate for the city is 14,804, or about an increase of 2.4% from 2020. Median Income 2019 to 2022 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60, 000 $40, 000 $20,000 $0 2019 2020 2021 2022 ■ Minnesota ■ Wright County • Monticello The median income for the city is below county levels and state levels (per Census Bureau). Income has increased in recent years. Median Home Prices: Citv of Monticello Source: NorthstarMLS Stats Median Sales Price Twin Cures Region — Monticello t: $300K $275K $250K $225K . 1-2019 1-2020 1-2021 1-2022 1-2023 1-2024 Twin Cibes Region & Monticello Each Gala print is 12 months d —Ay. Data is from April 1. 2024 AN data from NOM WNLS. Data deemed reliable but not guaranteed. InfoSp ft ®2024 ShowingTme. The median household income for the city is below the Twin Cities Metro. The median home price started to plateau since the start of 2022; this is likely attributed to increasing interest rates. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 23 NEIGHBORHOOD MAP ad 39 NE aL Irjr �� -25 If C,4 75 SE o(y/ saw, Stm Jil d ��a y� htusSSpw. . h 'St Monticeno 4 •cy st W �'� S 3t rj 25 75 e� si F F as 41,e NW taut t 19a 45 V&zw _ m •� 52 93 > St F 6j AyaqAW _ C 'b7 Ra 6 � 9 , 0 Dundas ZU Subject N o � r v 6ppfh 3t Z� e �W z m ] 75 Schoo( Blvd -A Orjo e = �1= Starling Dr Sark Dry 6�m FY I �$ Deer St �$ Bakken St 85th St er St N NE 79th St NE Page 24 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 �'♦(t, a , HII- [Hems Savannah Ave a4q - t / PFUNTecf1_Rntoration•ie-- rPaza Pa rch r x �o# a een D'er ologyM K - ! ` 1 Aroplarporrattio*- _X ..o Ilo V� • - .. .. �.r •' �� r Lakella�� _Transmission & Auto p Due.-__.__ _ _ f r • z QUO �.• AA 'wainMa,e y ., •�' DIs Rd M r i 's Farni ,� i,-d t mtlasrRd » r • i''♦�jME C', Monticello Pat,- Dent■?.-. Ea g'e Rfca In cu f r iuD • • d .ALDl t �Erna MovieTheater • �s •' c •' ',1 LittlE , t oy v .Jl Will i IOL/ en ' �B uffalc il. IngS . EV9 Tae KWOm�� i-. 5a1'ool Blvd Sd ool el Mo titcho 6� d Pebblebr k D *40 Oslund Seam _ The Meado:rs MHC , I Gutte.� — ) S r: � i I I (♦1 C. � � Falron Di •r'riel/be t \ \` \� am . ohA�dEfr w C D ond1Dr KIellbergtCl Klelloer9Pa�k 'Cabolesro"e is Nate 's Painting Paik o'r, -. Eaton.Crr,y r, LLC Minneapolis,— Theisens Mobile's ak'Or �� �� �^ r•BgthSt Mechanic gsrh, • < . • t oFj SP�� / �4� .` I \. *• Hey Girl' eauty Co I BEFORE ANALYSIS Page 26 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SITE DESCRIPTION Dimensions: Gross Site Area: Net Site Area: Topography / Low Area: Shape: Soil conditions: Drainage: Utilities: Electricity / Gas: Water / Sanitary Sewer: Off -Site Improvements: Street/Curb-gutter: Sidewalk: Visual Road Condition: Street Lights / Alley: Storm Sewer: Access to site (#) / Frontage Traffic Count: Visibility: Flood hazard zone: Apparent Easements: Encroachments: Unusual Conditions: Use: Land to Building ratio Excess/Surplus Land: Functional Adequacy: Somewhat rectangular 1,171,328 SF (26.89 acres), per county, confirmed with aerial GIS measure 1,171,328 SF (26.89 acres) Somewhat level / Ponding Somewhat rectangular Assumed to be stable Appears adequate Yes / Yes Public water / Public sanitary sewer Asphalt / Concrete Asphalt (along School Boulevard), concrete along Cedar Street Dated to Average Standard / None Yes School Boulevard (two), Cedar Street (three) The MnDOT traffic count map indicates 6,251 vehicles per day (in 2022) along School Boulevard Average The site does not appear to be in the flood zone, see following map Typical utility and drainage assumed; there is an existing overhead powerline easement along the southern property line None apparent, no survey provided None noted Commercial n/a None noted Functional site Surrounding Uses: N Commercial E Office S Residential W Commercial Distance to Major Road: About one block northwest to Highway 25 Comments: The subject is located near the Highway 25 corridor. The surrounding uses include residential, agricultural land (future development), and commercial. The subject site has average development appeal. There is an apparent overhead powerline easement on the site, see following plat map. No apparent adverse influences or easements noted or reported. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 27 LLU ,on ]its mill*_�.....___. —�� ■ ILI Tin I j J� 1 IL -- ►�--.•� Nil ZONING Subject Zoning: B-3, Highway Business District The purpose of the "B-3" (highway business) district is to provide for Intent (city code): limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Agriculture; active park facilities (public); essential services; passive parks and open space; public buildings or uses; brew pub; business support services; commercial lodging; convenience retail; Permitted Uses: entertainment/recreation, indoor commercial; financial institution; offices, commercial and professional services; personal services; restaurants; retail commercial uses; retail service; specialty eating establishments; Passenger terminal; place of public assembly; auto -repair — minor; commercial self -storage; day care centers; entertain ment/recreation, Conditional Uses/Special outdoor commercial; event center; production brewery or micro - Permit: distillery with taproom or cocktail room; vehicle fuel sales; vehicle sales and rental; veterinary facilities (neighborhood); auto repair - major; land reclamation; wrecker and towing services; Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 29 I Zoning — Continued Offices, Professional and Commercial: 1.0 space for each bedroom, of which one must be enclosed, plus one guest parking Parking: space for every four units General Retail: 1.0 space for each 200 square feet Minimum lot size: None Maximum lot coveraqe: n/a Major Restriction/ Minimum lot width: 100' requirements in this district: Front vard setback: 30 feet Side vard setback: 10 feet interior lot and 20 feet street lot Rear yard setback: 20 feet Maximum buildinq heiqht: 30 feet or 2.0 stories Use: The existing use appears to be allowed and permitted; if found otherwise, the value could differ. Source: Zoning map, city code Page 30 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Future Land Use Map — Continued The RC, Regional Commercial designation is described as the following in the city's comprehensive plan: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) The Regional Commercial designation includes large-scale commercial uses serving a regional market, typically on large sites along the Interstate of major arterials roadways such as State Highway 25. Retail uses within this category usually have large floor areas and high sales volumes and may be considered shopping "destinations" by consumers from the region. Uses such as furniture and electronic stores, farm supply, home improvement stores, department stores, "big box" retailers. hotels and restaurants are included. Smaller and more local -serving retail uses, and personal services are generally not appropriate but could be allowed if complementary to a regional use. Commercial • "Big Box" Stores • Department Stores Hotels • Restaurants Recreational Plaza • Public Space Primary Mode Vehicular with access to collectors and arterials Transit or shuttle service Secondary Mode Shared bike/ pedestrian facilities Comprehensive Plan Conclusion: • Floor Area Ratio y 2018 Correlating (FAR) Zoning District 0.30 to 0.50 B-3 • Height - Highway 1,2 stories. 4 stories Business District for hotels or office B-4 • Lot Area - Regional N/A Business District The subject is guided for a commercial use, which is consistent with the current zoning. Page 32 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 12firereloWhyZi FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Map Number 2705340015E Zone X Map Date August 04, 1988 RIPS 27171 MAPLEGEND 1-1 Areas inundated by 500-year flooding El Areas inundated by 100-year flooding ❑ Velocity Hazard The subject is indicated by the red arrow, the improvements are not located in a flood zone Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 33 AERIAL / PLAT MAP The red outline reflects the subject gross site area, per county. The yellow outline reflects the approximate overhead powerline easement. Page 34 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 TOPOGRAPHY MAP The above topography map is from the MN DNR website. The site appears to be mostly level. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 35 WETLAND MAP PEM1A The above wetland map is from the National Wetlands Inventory website. The subject is indicated by the red arrow. It appears there are no wetland areas outside of the pond. Note: The above exhibit is from the MN DNR NWI Wetland Finder. It is a preliminary wetland map that is not an official wetland delineation. That said, the NWI Wetland Finder is a good resource for the beginning of wetland research. Page 36 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Looking southwest on Cedar Street Looking northwest on School Boulevard Site view (Google Street view) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 37 HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and best use is defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition as, "The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria that the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity". Highest and best use is analyzed in two ways, site as vacant and site as improved. Typically, there are four criteria in highest and best use analysis Legally permissible uses What uses are allowed by zoning? Physically possible uses What uses are physically possible on the site? Financially feasible use Which possible and permissible uses will produce a positive return? Maximally productive use Of the financially feasible uses, which use produces the highest return warranted by the market (the ideal improvements)? Site as Vacant: The use of the real estate based on the presumption that the parcel of land is vacant or can be made vacant by demolishing any improvements (i.e., as vacant or as if vacant). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, page 307) Legally Permissible Uses: The current B-3, Highway Business District zoning allows for primarily commercial uses. The subject is guided for RC, Regional Commercial which appears to be similar to the existing zoning. Physically Possible Uses: The subject site is somewhat rectangular, with a rectangular building pad area. Visibility and access to the property are rated average. The physical characteristics of the site appear suitable for development. The property has electricity, gas, public water, and public sanitary sewer available. Access to Highway 25 and Interstate 94 is nearby, which is also appealing. Financially Feasible Uses: Typically, surrounding uses, market demand, and availability of financing drive financially feasible uses. Surrounding Uses: Uses in the immediate area are commercial, residential, and future development land. A commercial use would be supported. Financing: Current interest rates range from 7.50% to 8.50%+. Borrowers typically must be well qualified with 20% to 30% down. Financing for owner occupied properties (residential, commercial, industrial, and business) is rated to be average to good. Financing for multi -tenant commercial or office is rated to be average, however, most projects must be substantially pre - leased before lenders will extend financing. The subject is zoned and guided for a commercial use. Financing for new commercial construction is rated to be average, with interest rates ranging from 6.75% to 7.75%+. Loan terms for new construction are typically 20% or more down and 25-year amortization rates. Market Demand: Market demand for commercial land in the subject area is average. The City of Monticello is within commuting distance of the Twin Cities Metro area. The city also has multiple national and regional retailers and medical providers that provide services to residents. Financially Feasible Uses: A commercial development is logical on the site. Given the location and overall size of the subject, development timing is likely now to 2+ years. Page 38 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Highest and Best Use — Continued Maximally Productive Use: The highest and best use as vacant is considered to be for a commercial development as market demand warrants and zoning allows. The subject site is large enough to accommodate a single user ("big box") or multiple smaller commercial buildings (mixture of single- and multi -occupant structures). New construction generally results in average to good quality commercial buildings. Most Probable Buyer: Developer who would construct a commercial development. Valuation Methodology: Commercial land sales will be considered to value the subject. Site as Improved: The use that should be made of the real estate as it exists (i.e., as currently improved or as if improved as proposed). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, page 307) The subject is improved with a single -occupant commercial building. This is similar to the highest and best use, as -if vacant. Given the scope of the assignment and acquisition area, this analysis is not applicable. However, a continued commercial use is logical. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 39 COST APPROACH The subject is being appraised as vacant land; therefore, the Cost Approach is not considered applicable and was not applied. INCOME APPROACH The Income Approach was not applied as rental and capitalization rate data for land like the subject is limited, which renders the approach unreliable. Page 40 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 L-Y-1T10 Tolh In the sales comparison approach, an opinion of market value is developed by comparing properties similar to the subject property that have recently sold, are listed for sale, or are under contract (i.e., for which purchase offers and a deposit have been recently submitted). A major premise of the sales comparison approach is that an opinion of the market value of a property can be supported by studying the market's reaction to comparable and competitive properties. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 351) Supply and Demand: Property prices result from negotiations between buyers and sellers. In a market with many buyers and sellers, buyers make up the market demand the properties offered for sale or lease currently or in the foreseeable future make up the supply. To estimate demand, appraisers consider the number of potential users of a particular type of property, their purchasing power, and their tastes and preferences. To analyze supply, appraisers focus on existing properties that are available on the market as well as properties that are being constructed, converted, or planned. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Substitution: The principle of substation holds that the value of property tends to be set by the cost of acquiring a substitute or alternative property of similar utility and desirability within a reasonable amount of time. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Balance: The forces of supply and demand tend toward equilibrium, or balance, in the market, but absolute equilibrium is almost never attained. Due to shifts in population, purchasing power, consumer tastes and preferences, and many other factors, demand varies greatly over time. The construction of new buildings, conversion of existing buildings to other uses, and demolition of old buildings cause supply to vary as well. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Externalities: External forces affect all types of property in positive or negative ways. Periods of economic growth and economic decline influence property values. Appraisers analyze the market area of the subject property to identify all significant external influences. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 353) When possible, select comparables with similar location, economic conditions and support facilities. Land Value: "Sales comparison is usually the preferred method for developing an opinion of site value. When this method is used, most of the techniques for selecting comparable sales and making adjustments that are described in Chapter 20 can be applied to site valuation. When there are not enough sales of similar parcels for the application of sales comparison, alternative methods such as market extraction, allocation, land residual analysis, and various income capitalization techniques may be used". (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 339) The Following Outline Is Used In The Sales Comparison Approach: - A location map of the comparable sales. - Comparable sales are listed. - An adjustment grid using the comparable sales. - A discussion of adjustment and conclusion of value. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 41 Comparable Location Map Primary Comparable Selection/Search Criteria: • Primary emphasis on commercial land sales • Sale date of January 1, 2019 +, older sales may be considered • 150,000 SF to 1,000,000 SF+ • Data from competing communities • In some instances, older data and/or data from competing communities will be utilized due to proximity to the subject and other characteristics similar to the subject. 0 " 24 , Enfield salida Powell I - •�` ' Park lea. 1 .-•��� '}`- - PraI Me;adoays Park'i " Land Sale 5 Sure _reeb. Land Sale 3 - Corn Land Sale 2 Memorial ark Missr>n10 +Elk'�,tiyer I ' Oaks Park # - 7 y . .. ..... ......."11�� 4 r j E3 v.v k4 Will 4 � Like - R 83 5U6leR Lard Sale 1 42 �! y a Maple Lake Munici AI , l Land Sale 4 Dr 37 . ' oft , Lake M • 291 37 St. Michael r' 9 13 144 ` • s *' Rog ,203 Abon • Center 4 'L r i W �ft I _ .'� Wf r� • r WL _Highland Raart 35 �"H[ilover �g eal9 Muni Dal Iryalo C 117 116 rT ' N N E s 0 C m r , 2a / gu rills flee 2fi ara°1r< ;` y ` r it Hidden Meado s P k w a 19 Cor Iran " a, I 11'- 66 • Ke1terlacke7 rk � R'o Rckrortl So ID S L e ReDe rk Real Ca -y e rose f 12 Loral Con rl f _`, 17 11 -'Medina Park - PI _ Delano S .,CI d 8 13 - 92 n In�epend M le Plain „ 201 n,g 24 'a �J • l a - rend .................................................... Ortar .. �-!,) ynda e `+ 4., 112 Long Lake �. sled 20 W$edOW, Y YF.......... Saga Hill 1 °Baubbs-1E� Y f '• . Xazeaan `1 ,5 Woodland united alf 24 to 110 as J 19 Minnetonka Beach i l ?� ■ Mound -Spring Mlnnelonk 33 ,y.-�-_ MirVretriSta Perk Tonka Bay Deephaven 7 4 C Us l ollywood Mayer 25Center Shw E.. ou..k.avEacGelrsparmI' z Pree ,...B.o..n..r.a. ...... Carver Park Reserve .......... 30 1 Germany 7 S17 4 7CLEOD _ 11 -1'-_au P Land Sale 6 f�Virtoria 32 - � % .212 0 _ f : 18 qr - �Hydas Lake C11 R V E �_ 284 pusta B1y. �1�5 1! t Ham L Champin 109th 1 �- to3 `` 3 202 r O 31 Brooklyn - a7 log -Park e e r _ ap o a Palmer =5 Frl �ayfeltl �- y - Brookjyrl� Carl � .tat Ani, a 1 � New Hope R�gbi flril _..0 Crystal 127 H mrc! r ', aFo 153 Playr ` 2- ,�, G01de 55 # _ o alla;l -_ 1 M Park '1e9 dar 40 �- e1 73 St. Louis Va Park 5 ark H M claw ook a, Edina I - `^� 1L581 Y .100, - - 53 ` W �aa eav r o field 7 J� 29 :I 34 17 13I00tr1r)(001 i � r Page 42 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ®apartments ♦ ' 7�r• 9r Lakeland' � - ' Transmission 8 Auto- , Due North Car as Jensen Precision + s Maci R'�'� `•_ 7�r J40iWiha Tool a d Martie's Farm Services Dundas Rd�' ••� f ,Inn o ative SERVPRO of ' ein ell � U*Aut`o Solutions Wright County Harrod Paint ess1♦ Dent Re air Cull ver's r �aiA� d ► �! - -SDI �nird,.�► �' .}da.i .•=t a 41V !•� ffi to. Bu a " t o ` B. U acne: Tae„K�o,r� • ® �" School Blvd S -� Do Monticello, �" d �scpoatreiY6 1c,�s 3 ff Pe6blebrcck Dr �Pd, Walmart S,upercenter'f v / m 4 -Gym b^forks' • - 1 erg Ct ' % Oslund Seamless • 4Pole,n ° Gutters LLC m �`;, ►n�/� y klelrterg 'ct 't- • .. drd C❑ i \eo Diamond or Kjellberg Ct Kjeute{g Park* Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Proaerty Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date: Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #1 N II 1Ij} om 3 �0 25 K�Aherq C} 7i— `� KJe+'ter 9 Park Sf p XXXX Edmonson Avenue Northeast, Monticello 155-269-001010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Apartment - 18.64 units per acre Average Utilities: Public 467,398 SF Improvements: None Larger development land site that was zoned for a PUD (potential for commercial or apartments) use. The buyer purchased to develop apartments (200 units). $2,100,000 March 20, 2023 Price /SF: Sale Terms: Monticello Lakes LLC Sale Conditions: Monticello Lake Apartments, Source/Verification LLC The property was listed on the open market. $4.49 per SF Cash Typical RediComps / CREV Page 44 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sale Comparison Approach — Continued Sale Comparable 2 Aerial Image Address: XXXX School Boulevard, Monticello The land sale is indicated by the red arrow. Surrounding uses are commercial (Walmart), office, and residential. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 45 I Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Property Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #2 +x�d�bsI: anpstead Of Land 5ale2 'f /J / sChOpV BVvd . 600th St 25 OG �. 7006) St K198bpr9 900th St Kmber9 park E 41�Sf qF 87rh St NE m XXXX School Boulevard, Monticello 155-221-000010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Mixed -Use Shared Northern Portion Utilities: Public 165,528 SF Improvements: n/a Mixed -use land that is located near the subject. Walmart, a major commercial retailer, is located immediately to the west. $515,000 December 12, 2023 Brick by Brick Development LLC Kjellberg's Inc. The property was listed on the Price /SF: Sale Terms: Sale Conditions: Source/Verification )pen market. $3.11 per SF New Mortgage Typical RediComps / CREV Page 46 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ~ I Jlffy L Y- �.;oQ. O; A is Wartin_ g - �$50 Off At i(± 'Jiffy Luber • ♦,Best keste lu •helsea Pro Re s t o ra t i o n +�'�. ♦ Aroplax Corp Deephave A artments • Monticello WCCA WIC h a Lakeland VV v Transmission & Auto Due North Car- a ♦ � ' N ; , 7r'Nlartie's Farm Services upd3«Rd Dundas Rd SERVPRO ,�• '++ ,. � � Wright Cou Harrod PaintI ss r Dent Repair. Eagle Ridge Ln N i m ead Cu Ver ro ; p asm v + i �%BAY • AL•DI •: �, o � d Great C+ps • � �a * � urea E ip Hobe o m u ffy7alo Wil Wings Evo Tae Kwon.& gEhocl Sivd�Sch6cl�aNdq atch March Monticello Madness wnh ings SChooVal� +^ 3 PebblebrookDr— Subwway✓ `S y` BOG0�50%Foo longs rw N at Subwayg Gyp Works a o '. ¢¢Oslund Seamless~ Appti 0 3 0 Gutters LLC ,� ` E u� Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Property Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #3 t I 3! 0 ` 52 93 "broil` 0 � o 25 Lard Sale 3'Qry, � DundasJ�—= �� h� ° Fatmsteado m w School Blvd 3t �0 faVcon 0 ,a Starling Dr St Ks/lberg Ct x y0ard Cr � M _ St A= PWk Dr XXXX Dundas Road, Monticello 155-230-000010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial/Residential Average Utilities: Public 1,452,351 SF Improvements: None Larger parcel of land located near the subject. The gross site area is 1,554,656 SF, however, approximately 102,305 SF is encumbered with an existing road. Therefore, the net site area is 1,452,351 SF. The site is guided for a commercial and residential use. $3,264,559 September 22, 2021 City of Monticello Lundsten Farms, LLP The property was available f negotiated. Price /SF: Sale Terms: Sale Conditions: Sou rce/Verification: )r sale. The city approached t $2.10 per SF Cash Typical RediComps / CREV ie buyer; the sale price was Page 48 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 r t1 n®rme in uewacenng, me m Shadow woods Park?itan Machine 'A�' PetePDoran Lawn* ` Piano • &.LLa��andscaping {r Rogers`Hig'►Schyol ♦ r " " , � Football Field Norden'Dr y i2ogers High Sc o o c� ♦ Ultimat' G01fRCarts Tennis G Fou'r4Mati9n Sales ♦ �' C4 k K 142ndAve•N _ ` c Sports nnesota R0 er etnW.� ♦ Davanni's.P_izza. �► if an�tl Hot Hoagies•/ Rogers Activity Ce ter ACS Remodeling • North 101 B sme s P.ar . a ♦Anytime Fitness 04list►Kiel N Ave IN 7 4st+A s Eye Taxidermyr 7 ve,N ' 1 a greens ^ /• ,Y dowse IV'Na�larreens 7 j Rogers ' idCare sales r a r Conng" 7r40ih tractiInc t • 'Gtr-N p. Rogers Mi dl S0 00 \ 10 �asmine�ay , r F Rogers Mitldl y �2 •. School Tennis Co r, Fa, Ro•ersPetClinid♦ 'Cu r rrlR •� ' Bedrock' otersIk • H r e:♦ L1 e 138th'Ave•N I t. 4 NOrh.I .. 1 Commun Park 11 + fa r ►o'rclii 13 t urp y's I dq� Ta a izva `Takeo -Deli I� 1 7 Ave+N Midwestf ur enPGafe' —' + i I ! g , - omme— Blvd . Th Presi TGK �tomo " , •Ommi ym�� a Ine, Roge Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Property Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #4 -_ off_— r.nSale 4 g Oardrre AWe D r g m � N o` Y Jasmine.,_ � -o '1 xrcnn o0 L cammunay g PM1 'n a �38fi, Me 14 Z Park Nan1 Orchid Ave 711 Corc OPemmtly rY O _ \371h AveN nl w v a 52 Red Fpx Pa 1341h Ave N Fawn 7rallco '_ XXXX Highway 101, Rogers 14-120-23-21-0017, -0022, -0020 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Irregular Utilities: Public 179,032 SF Improvements: None Commercial land located along Highway 101. The site is irregular, which does reduce development appeal. $1,040,000 December 1, 2023 City of Rogers Rogers Development Partners, LLC The property was listed on the Price /SF: Sale Terms: Sale Conditions: Source/Verification )pen market. $5.81 per SF Cash Typical Costar, RediComps / CREV Page 50 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 •.a� •4,a x`;• • Sorr Ct p(rte�, a � , • � W 6ih Sr we1"r r o •.\� �t\K� u icy ' M PPa• � .' W M ra, A,.,rUt�S =- UhnAPr. r�4iw� s parA/e1Mea`rtihrf'' - t �Ra iotsP��ts Moot�� �o Ii�.��e,(`.d�y } ;•, �NAtW.NJ,w��, ��..,�N�� � 1�RS�GC�- �. Gaga : 7 J rrrNih,P,r.�....,. - w.�••• V • (�AO�.{{ We Ilia r� `Or _ ` se aen s Yi Ems ti �. �.c • 1 .`,s et � r.. � � � r11t 2\fir'}'`e: 1 64#P °Oao,' A► meta r �� * ,�'•� ,T ♦a,,,' 1 �: ve\aria � � - _ � pr1 �hFM • �' , rt S�gtM•tiy�` M 'L o f Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Property Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #5 XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello 155-253-001010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 265,280 SF Improvements: None Commercial land that was purchased for an RV dealership. Surrounding uses include mini - storage and residential. The site has less intense commercial uses as compared to the subject and the location is rated inferior. $810,000 April 20, 2019 DSN Investments, LLC Price /SF: Sale Terms: Sale Conditions: $3.05 per SF New Mortgage Typical Ocello LLC Source/Verification: RediComps / CREV The property was listed on the open market. The listing broker, Wayne Elam, verified the sale information. Page 52 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Lifecore w %% 4r v I Springs at L Lake Al •M / iem Upper f Lake Grace Super Radiator Coil �; w Stutlia SLVR-♦ WEoWmbi'a . i; Apex I to at'onaI♦��. River Valley, c Dance Academy Big Woods J Lake Precision Heating & Cooling '�� .► Eastern Carve County Evans Garment School District 112 ♦Qi : / Restoration f •Crystal Construction and Handyman Carver Coun � 3 p Environmental Center ♦• Three Ghairs•• b • Hazeltine Shores Structures, IncJ U♦ ♦ Z t r. a N t zTeniporarI cb �LulutEEve" Renta,1s-♦1 r••• M04-P. Hez Blvo— \ e\Bae r K• \ �r Hazeltine National GolfCluh Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #6 r 78 �U�ec 41 Lard 6 I,// a Lake Haza6w Ha tl take Mnathan 3 ��' WKni ht c Park Park Q Property Data Address: 2 Oak Ridge Drive, Chaska PID/Legal Description: 30-4730020 Description: Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Physical Characteristics: Average Utilities: Public Site Size: 737,035 SF Improvements: None This property reflects a larger site that was zoned PMD, Planned Multi -Use Development. The zoning allows for a variety of uses, including residential, commercial, office, etc. The site is Comments: guided for Mixed Residential, which likewise allows for residential, commercial, and office uses. The buyer purchased the site to construct a Costco Warehouse commercial building. The trade area is concluded to be 5 miles. Sale Data Sale Price: $8,000,000 Price /SF: $10.85 per SF Sale/Close Date: October 7, 2022 Sale Terms: Cash Buyer: Costco Wholesale Sale Conditions: Typical Corporation Seller: RCS-RECA Oak Ridge, LLC Source/Verification: RediComps / CREV The property was listed on the open market. The listing broker, Nick Carmichael, verified the sale information. While the sale occurred in October 2022, the purchase agreement was Comments: signed in May 2020. Reportedly, the sale was delayed due to a partnership issue. The price was reported to be unchanged. As such, the price is considered to be indicative of May 2020. The buyer reported that due to a steep topography a retaining wall will need to be constructed. The buyer indicated an estimated cost of $1,500,000 for the retaining wall. Page 54 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Listed below is the adjustment grid for the comparables listed on the previous pages. Comparable items of significant difference are adjusted for. Description Subject 1 2 3 9320 )000( )000( )000( Address Cedar Street Edmonson Ave NE School Boulevard Dundas Road Monticello Monticello Monticello Monticello (Proximity Subject Adjacent to E 1 block W Adjacent to N (Financing Market Cash New Mortgage Cash (Conditions Typical Typical Typical Typical Market Conditions - Mar-23 Dec-23 Sep-21 (Location Average Average Average Average (Zoning/Use Commercial Aprt�-18.64umtsperare Mixed -Use Comrercial/Residential Phys Char Average Average Shared Northern Average Portion (Improvements n/a None n/a None Size -- -- -- -- Age Condition — Utilities Public Public Public Public (Sale Price — $2,100,000 $515,000 $3,264,559 Site Size (SF) 1,171,328 467,398 165,528 1,452,351 (Price per SF -Site Size I $4.49 I $3.11 I $2.25 �Cond. Adj. +/- (Financing Market (Conditions Typical (Market Conditions — 2.04% Net Cond. Adj. I 2.04% (Effective $/SF - Site Size I $4.58 (Adjustments +/- (Location Average (Zoning/Use Commercial -10% IPhys Char Average (Improvements n/a Utilities Public Site Size (SF) 1,171,328 -5 % Net Adjustment -15 % Adjusted Price per SF - Site Size $3.90 4 )OOOC Highway 101 Rogers 12.8 mi SE Cash Typical Dec-23 Good Commercial Irregular None Public $1,040,000 179,032 $5.81 5 )000( Chelsea Road W Monticello 1.01 mi NW New Mortgage Typical Apr-19 Fair Commercial Average None Public $810,000 265,280 $3.05 6 2 Oak Ridge Drive Chaska 32.2 mi SE Cash Typical Oct-22 Very Good Commercial Fair None Public $8,000,000 737,035 $10.85 0.59% 5.03% 0.65 % 9.88% 7.82% 0.59 % 5.03 % 0.65 % 9.88 % 7.82% $3.13 $2.36 $5.85 $3.36 $11.70 -10% 10% -20% 10% 10% 10% -10% -10% -10% -5% 0% 0% 10%0°/ 15% $3.13 $2.36 $-5.26 $3.36 $-9.95 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 55 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Discussion of Adjustments Property Rights: Refers to the ownership interest conveyed at the time of sale. Properties with leases or other encumbrances in place can sell for more or less than comparable properties that sell fee simple interest. • All transactions were fee simple, no adjustment warranted. Financing: The impact financing may have had on the sale price, favorable interest rate or term. • All sales were cash or estimated to be near or at market rates. Conditions of sale: Reflects non -market conditions, which may or may not have impacted the sale price, such as differing motivations of buyer or seller (related parties, distressed or liquidation sale, listings, pending, occupancy, assemblage, etc.), impending eminent domain proceedings, influence due to tax ramifications, or lack of market exposure. • All transactions appear to be typical transactions, no adjustment warranted. Market Conditions: Based on a variety of data, the appraiser concludes to an annual appreciation rate of 2%. This rate is applied accordingly to the sales comparables. Location: This adjustment is based on the appraiser's judgment. It takes into consideration surrounding land uses, intended use, neighborhood characteristics, traffic, exposure and access. • Comparable 4 adjusted for superior location. • Comparable 5 adjusted for inferior location. • Comparable 6 adjusted for superior location. Zoning/Use: • Comparable 1 adjusted downward for apartment development; there appears to be more market demand for this property type as compared to commercial. Physical Characteristics: Shape and topography adjustments reflect the market preference for mostly rectangular and level parcels, which optimize development potential. • Sale 2 is adjusted upward for a shared access area in the northern portion of the site. • Sale 4 is adjusted upward for irregular site shape. • Comparable 6 adjusted upward for required retaining wall. Page 56 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Improvements: • The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Utilities: • The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Site Size: Adjustments recognize larger parcels of land typically sell for less per SF than smaller sites. Comparables adjusted accordingly. • The adjustment is based on discussions with market participants as well as previously observed sales. Conclusion: The comparables used are rated to be the most indicative of data analyzed and bracket the subject value. Other sales reviewed were older, further and/or needed more adjustment. Adjustments are made on a per SF basis. The comparables utilized in this analysis each have several similar characteristics in common with the subject. While none are totally identical to the subject, each represents a viable alternative to a prospective buyer of the subject property and, after adjustment, can be utilized as an indicator of market value for the subject property. Indicator Un-adiusted Price per SF Range $2.25 - $10.85 Average $4.93 Median $3.80 Adiusted Price per SF $2.36 - $9.95 $4.66 $3.63 Sale 6 is a high outlier, however, it was purchased for the development of a big box user (Costco). More weight is given to Sales 1, 2, 3, and 5 due to proximity. Considering the above data, the subject location, characteristics, quality, powerline easement, and the current market conditions, a value near the mid -range is considered appropriate. Site Size (SF) 1,171,328 Indicated Value (land only) Value per SF Total $4.00 $4,685,312 $4,685,000 (rnd.) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 57 RECONCILIATION Cost Approach Not Applied Sales Comparison Approach $4,685,000 Income Approach Not Applied The Cost Approach to value was not applied as the subject is being appraised as vacant land. The Direct Sales Comparison Approach to value analyzed recent sales of properties as compared with the characteristics of the subject property. Adjustments were made to the comparables to make them as similar to the subject as possible. This results in an indication of market value at which a typical buyer would be willing to pay for the subject property. Quality and quantity of data rated to be average. The Income Approach was not utilized due to limited rents and capitalization rates of properties similar to the subject. Conclusion: The Sales Comparison Approach is given the most weight. Data quantity and quality was rated to be average. Final Value Opinion (BEFORE) The value opinion is: $4,685,000 EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME Reasonable Exposure Time: Typically 12 months before Marketing Time Opinion: 12 months +/- after the effective the effective date of the appraisal. date of the appraisal. Page 58 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 AFTER ANALYSIS The neighborhood, site, regional, aerial, comparables, etc. descriptions are the same in the before as the after (unless otherwise noted on the following pages). The highest and best use of the site as vacant is for commercial development as market demand warrants and zoning allows. The highest and best use of the site as improved is not applicable. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 59 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Monticello is a reconstruction of School Boulevard. Per the city project website, the purpose of the project is to "Increase pedestrian safety and reduce potential conflict points along the School Boulevard corridor." Improvements include a new pedestrian crossing at the Meadow Oak Avenue and Fenning Avenue roundabout crossing Fenning Avenue, extension of the sidewalk in -front of Eastview Education Center connecting south to School Boulevard to help with bus drop-off and pick-up, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard at Pelican Lane, removal of pedestrian crossing on School Boulevard at Eider Lane, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard between Eider Lane and Fallon Avenue, improvements to the School Boulevard High School entrance to include right -turn channelization for vehicles exiting the parking lot and a refuge island for pedestrians, install radar feedback speed signs on School Boulevard, and extend trail on the south side of School Boulevard between Cardinal Hills Park and Fenning Avenue. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring new right-of-way, permanent easement, and temporary easements. Description of the acquisition areas and types: Right-of-Wav Acquisition (ROW): Used for right of way related purposes (road construction, ponding, etc.). The city will acquire this area in fee; the property owner does not retain any ownership rights. The city reported the following ROW for the project. Site Size — Before 1 1,171,328 SF Acquisition Area — ROW 1 1,130 SF Site Size - After 1 1,170,198 SF Permanent Easement: The easement area is used for sidewalk/trail purposes. The subject owner remains the underlying owner of the area. The city reports the following for permanent easement area: Total Permanent Easement None Page 60 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Project Description — Continued Temporary Easement: Used for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. A market rate of return will be found for the time period that the temporary easement exists. Because the owner retains ownership of the temporary easement area, it is not applicable to subtract it as a loss from the "Before" site size. For the specific subject parcel, it appears that the sloping after the project will be similar to the sloping before the project with minimal changes. However, because changes can occur during actual construction, the appraiser reserves the right to reconsider damages if the slope exceeds 1 to 4 in the after condition. The temporary easement length is anticipated to last 20 months. Temporary Easement Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 3,407 SF Page 61 I i.na. Tmow ngNWz- .,... �oo GueSeamless -c Misslssippi RyP, 94Ri0er Park AD i nd Bus Company_ StHenry C tholic.Church , w • 1 _ Uftiiwate . Th Jlf Lube e Home,Depo i Polaris MCO • Unde'•oatin .SSD Off At 4 ' -�uh J-ffy Lutie� �,._. y uut o ffiz 1 1jM Ultra -•,� ,Mni]g : SERVPRO o Flee. Fans 81 • oust• r J _ ;P .40 ALDI ! ` Rf w. Monticello igh°Sch0oi `' 1� Shop YOU' Local ALDI • -1-- I t R �� - 1 t rc ;Ufl Little Mountain,• t T �i,�ep ^ °Bemeintary"I ■■j Buffalo Wild`Winy' i+, „_ __• {.Jamiscn Avp:N Order Oelive � _ - r '. CU(nmu ity Unit Mon rvieiv, ountain Y : ' Bike Challenge Cc urs r, Pioneer Park r 1 r 1 Thei a r I� The Bouncy House Guy, , reengilneered, inc i 0. SKETCH OF ACQUISITION O Is.011\ Easement Exhibit r r City of Monticello N Property Owner: WAL—MART REAL EST BUSINESS TR PIN$ 155207001010 9320 CEDAR STREET 0 �w sr �LLL1lJ RoVassa Twro001 Y �� .. «. .,« ■■■ ,w-akansoe Anderson aorc. z ; a.. 'u klsnl or woy ona sp E armrr Er' lYlt 1 The proposed right-of-way acquisition is outlined in red. The city indicates the proposed right-of-way acquisition is 1,130 SF. The new permanent easement area is outlined in blue. The city indicates the permanent easement is 0 SF. The new temporary easement area is outlined in green. The city indicates the temporary easement is 3,407 SF. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 63 PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA Acquisition Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Acquisition Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Page 64 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE Potential aspects of damage or loss in value to the subject property caused by the partial acquisition: - Land within the acquired area - Buildings located within the acquired area - Site improvements within the acquired area - Severance damage, the influence of the acquisition area on the subject property - Project Influence Land - Land value breakdown -- On the basis that all portions of the subject site have equal value contribution the subject's land value in the taking area is diminished by the pro -rated value of the land acquired. Buildings — There are no building improvements in the acquisition area. Site improvements — Based on an inspection, see below chart for site improvements, if any, that are impacted by the acquisition. The city will move and/or replace in kind any wells, septic systems, underground watering systems, and fences as needed. Site Improvements Description Type/Size/Condition Quantity/Rate Total Opinion of Market Value Trees Two medium deciduous trees, $750 each $1,500 Plantings None None None None None $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Driveway/Fence Underground Watering System Sign TOTAL $1,500 Note: The city is to maintain access to the subject during the project period. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 65 Aspects of Potential Damage — continued Severance damage — Given the current site layout and use, there is no severance damage to the remainder as a result of the acquisition. It is the appraiser's opinion the proposed acquisition as described in this report will not have an adverse effect on the marketability or value of the remainder due to the acquisition. See chart below. Primary Factors Considered for Estimating Potential Severance Site Characteristics Before After Location Average Average Access Average Average Street Improvements Trail Ponding Utilities Elevation Drainage Retaining Wall Sound Wall Fence House/Building Proximity to Road/ROW, approximate Site / Development Appeal Highest and Best Use Dated to Average Asphalt and concrete along School Boulevard None Public Average Average None None None n/a Average Some new Asphalt and concrete along School Boulevard None Public Average Average None None None n/a Average Commercial development Commercial development Net Impact Nil Nil Benefit not considered Nil M kv Nil *Appraised value does not give consideration to any benefit to the subject as result of the proposed project. Severance Discussion: Based on the above chart analysis, there is no severance damage to the remainder. The highest and best use of the subject in the before and the after is considered to be the same. Project Influence - The subject will have reasonable and suitable access throughout the project. The proposed project is considered typical. An informed buyer/property owner is aware that any property is subject to occasional disturbances due to various projects over the course of time; such as road upgrades, utility improvements, other infrastructure maintenance, construction/razing of buildings, renovations to the noted property, etc. Page 66 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES ROW Acquisition: Acquired for road purposes. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 100% loss in value. The new ROW area is reported to be 351 SF. Permanent Easement Acquisition: The easement area is used for sidewalk/trail purposes. The new easement area is reported to be 0 SF. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 95% loss in value. Temporary Easement: Used by the city for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. The city reports that the temporary easement will be 1,595 SF. Summary of Acquisition Estimate of Value Before Acquisition Land Value $4,685,000 Site Improvements See below $0 Total Value BEFORE Acquisition $4,685,000 Estimate of Value After Acquisition Total Value Before Acquisition, Land Only & Improvements in Acquisition Area $4,685,000 Less: ROW Acquisition Area 1,130 SF x$4.00 per SF x 100% loss = ($4,520) Prescriptive Easement Area 0 SF x$4.00 per SF x 100% loss = $0 Permanent Easement 0 SFx$4.00per SFx95%loss = $0 Site Improvements Two medium trees ($1,500) Net Value Before Severance $4,678,980 Severance None $0 Total Damages ($6,020) Total Value AFTER Acquisition $4,678,980 Temporary Easement 3,407 SF x$4.00 per SF x 10°% x20 months = $2,271 Total Temporary Easement Cost ($2,271) TOTAL DAMAGES AND COSTS (rounded) $8,300 Alternate Computation ROW Acqusition Area 1,130 SF x $4.00 per SF x 100% rights loss= $4,520 Prescriptive Easement Area 0 SF x $0.15 per SF x 100% rights loss= $0 Permanent Easement 0 SF x $4.00 per SF x 100% rights loss= $0 Site Improvements Two medium trees $1,500 Severance $0 Temporary Easement - Low Area 3,407 SF x $4.00 per SF x 10% x 20 months = $2,271 $2,271 Total (rounded) $8,300 *Slight deviations may exist due to rounding. EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME Reasonable Exposure Time: 12 months before the Marketing Time Opinion: 12 months +/- after the effective date of the appraisal. effective date of the appraisal. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 67 I DEFINITIONS MARKET VALUE - The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (A) buyer and seller are typically motivated, (B) both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (C) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market, (D) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (E) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition. Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — The right to use another's land for a stated purpose. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — An interest in real property that conveys use but not ownership to a portion of a property. Common easements include but are not limited to access, utility, and right of way. Specialty easements include but are not limited to conservation, preservation, aerial, and flowage. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition. Appraisal Institute TEMPORARY EASEMENT (definition) — An easement granted for a specific purpose and applicable for a specific time period. A construction easement, for example, is terminated after the construction of the improvement and the unencumbered fee interest in the land reverts to the owner. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition. Appraisal Institute Page 68 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES Regarding any adverse environmental and/or improvement structural conditions (such as, but not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, mold, construction defects or inadequacies, etc.) present in the improvements, on the site, or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: None are apparent, however, appraiser is not an expert in this field. Value assumes no hazardous or structural conditions exist. Value assumes any abandoned wells will be properly sealed. If any of these conditions exist the appraised value could differ significantly. EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS As stated by USPAP; Extraordinary Assumption: An assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions of conclusions. None Hypothetical Condition: That which is contrary to what exists but is supposed for the purpose of analysis. Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 69 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. The appraisers assume no responsibility for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor do the appraisers render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership and good management. 2. The furnished legal description is assumed to be correct. 3. Any sketch in the report may show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraisers have made no survey of the property. It is assumed unless otherwise noted that no survey has been viewed and that all improvements are located within the legally described property. 4. The appraisers are not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made the appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. 5. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of value for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 6. The appraisers assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraisers assume no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering, which might be required to discover such factors. 7. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, radon gas, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 8. Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the appraisers, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, the appraisers can assume no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished to the appraisers. 9. Disclosure of the contents of the appraisal report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which the appraisers are affiliated. No part of the contents of this report, or copy thereof (including conclusions as to the property value, the identity of the appraiser, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organizations, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected), shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or any other public means of communications without the prior written consent and approval of the appraisers. Page 70 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Assumptions & Limiting Conditions — continued 10. The appraisers have no present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised; and neither the employment to make the appraisal, nor the compensation for it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property. The appraisers have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. 11. The appraiser has personally inspected the subject site (unless noted otherwise). The comparable sales data has been viewed via aerial maps, photographs and/or online street views along with file pictures, when available. To the best of the appraiser's knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this report are true and correct, and the appraisers have not knowingly withheld any significant information. 12. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The appraisal is for the sole use of the named client. 13. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of the property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider possible non-compliance with the requirements of ADA in estimating the value of the property. 14. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the reported analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report was prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 15. The appraised value opinion assumes all leases (if any) are current and paid in full as of the effective date of the appraisal. 16. Excel grids and tables may have slight deviations due to rounding, which may have a nominal impact on value. 17. The appraised value opinion assumes all formulas used in the Excel grids throughout the report are accurate. 18. Unless noted, value assumes no apparent adverse site, building or zoning issues or conditions. 19. Site and building sizes are based on public record, data services, client and/or appraiser measurement at the time of appraisal and are considered reliable, but not guaranteed. Actual sizes herein could vary if made by an engineer/surveyor/contractor. 20. If any of the above if found to be different, value could change. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 71 CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1) The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2) The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions. 3) 1 have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4) 1 have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5) My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6) My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7) My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8) The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Appraisal Institute's Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, which includes the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice. 9) William R. Waytas has made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. Ethan Waytas did not inspect the subject property. Ethan Waytas wrote and selected all the data in the report. William R. Waytas read the report, concurred with the findings, and then co -signed the report. 10) No one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. 11) In accordance with the competency provision USPAP, I have verified that my knowledge, experience and education are sufficient to allow me to competently complete this appraisal. See attached qualifications. 12) As of the date of this report, Ethan Waytas and William R. Waytas have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the appraisal institute. 13) The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representative. 14) We have not provided services as an appraiser regarding the subject property within the 3-year period immediately preceding acceptance to this assignment. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: see report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: see report Page 72 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER I hereby certify: I have personally inspected the property herein appraised and that the owner has previously been afforded the opportunity to accompany me during an inspection. Such opportunity was afforded to the owner/representative and said individual did not accompany me on the inspection. That to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements contained in the appraisal herein above set forth are true and the information upon which the opinions expressed therein are based as correct; subject to the limiting conditions herein set forth. That I understand that such appraisal is to be used in connection with an acquisition, and that such appraisal has been made in conformity with the appropriate State laws, regulations, policies and procedures applicable to appraisal of such purposes and that to the best of my knowledge no portion of the value assigned to such property consists of items which are non-compensable under the established State law. That in making this appraisal I have disregarded any increase or decrease in the before value caused by the project for which the property is being acquired. That neither my employment nor the compensation for making this appraisal and report are in any way contingent upon the value reported herein. That I have no direct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition of such property appraised. That I will not reveal the findings and results of such appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of the acquiring agency until authorized by agency officials to do so, or until I am required to do so, by due process of law, or until I am released from this obligation by having publicly testified as to such findings. That the conclusion set forth in this appraisal was reached without collaboration or direction as to value. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: See Report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: See Report Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 73 QUALIFICATIONS Appraisal Experience Presently and since 2006, Ethan Wavtas, MAI has been employed as an employee of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (10 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. He is currently a full time licensed certified general real estate appraiser, partner, and director of the company's IT department. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, cinema, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, lakeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO, subdivisions, and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Tax Appeal — variety of property types, including commercial, industrial, and multi -family. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Testimony -- Court, commission, arbitration, mediation, etc. testimony has been given Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #40368613 Holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute Education -- Graduate of the University of Minnesota: College of Science and Engineering, Twin Cities Campus Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, with distinction, 3.86 GPA. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Basic Appraisal Procedures -- Basic Appraisal Principles -- 2012-2013 15-Hour National Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice -- General Appraiser Sales Comparison Approach -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 1 -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 2 -- Advanced Income Capitalization -- General Appraiser Report Writing and Case Studies -- Real Estate Finance, Statistics and Valuation Modeling -- 2014-2015 7-hour National USPAP Update Course -- General Appraiser Site Valuation & Cost Approach -- Advanced Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use -- Advanced Concepts & Case Studies -- Quantitative Analysis Page 74 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Appraisal Experience Presently and since 1985, William R. Waytas has been employed as a full-time real estate appraiser. Currently a partner and President of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (11 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. Mr. Waytas was employed with Iver C. Johnson & Company, Ltd., Phoenix, AZ from 1985 to 1987. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, hotel, hotel water park, bed & breakfast, cinema, marina, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, lakeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Review — residential, commercial and land development. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - most appraisal experience is in the greater Twin Cities Metro Area (typically an hour from downtown metro). Numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #4000813. Appraisal Institute: SRA, Senior Residential Appraiser Designation, General Associate Member Employee Relocation Council: CRP Certified Relocation Professional Designation. International Right -Of -Way Association: Member HUD/FHA: On Lender Selection Roster and Review Appraiser DNR: Approved appraiser for Department of Natural Resources Testimony -- Court, deposition, commission, arbitration & administrative testimony given. Mediator -- Court appointed in Wright County. Committees -- President of Metro/Minnesota Chapter, 2002, Appraisal Institute. -- Chairman of Residential Admissions, Metro/MN Chapter, Al. -- Chairman Residential Candidate Guidance, Metro/Minnesota Chapter, Al. -- Elm Creek Watershed Commission, Medina representative 3 years. -- Medina Park Commission, 3 years. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 75 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Education -- Graduate of Bemidji State University, Minnesota. B.S. degree in Bus. Ad. -- During college, summer employment in building trades (residential and commercial). -- Graduate of Cecil Lawter Real Estate School. Past Arizona Real Estate License. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Course 101-Introduction to Appraising Real Property. -- Numerous Standards of Professional Practice Seminar. -- Fair Lending Seminar. -- Eminent Domain & Condemnation Appraising. -- Eminent Domain (An In -Depth Analysis) -- Property Tax Appeal -- Eminent Domain -- Business Practices and Ethics -- Scope of Work -- Construction Disturbances and Temporary Loss of Going Concern -- Uniform Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book Seminar) -- Partial Interest Valuation Divided (conservation easements, historic preservation easements, life estates, subsurface rights, access easements, air rights, water rights, transferable development rights) Commercial/Industrial/Subdivision Courses & Seminars -- Capitalization Theory & Techniques -- Highest & Best Use Seminar -- General & Residential State Certification Review Seminar -- Subdivision Analysis Seminar. -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (general) -- Advanced Income Capitalization Seminar -- Advanced Industrial Valuation -- Appraisal of Local Retail Properties -- Appraising Convenience Stores -- Analyzing Distressed Real Estate -- Evaluating Commercial Construction -- Fundamentals of Separating Real Property, Personal Property and Intangible Business Assets Residential Courses & Seminars -- Course 102-Applied Residential Appraising -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (residential) -- HUD Training session local office for FHA appraisals -- Familiar with HUD Handbook 4150.1 REV-1 & other material from local FHA office. -- Appraiser/Underwriter FHA Training -- Residential Property Construction and Inspection -- Numerous other continuing education seminars for state licensing & Al Speaking Engagements -- Bankers -- Auditors -- Assessors -- Relocation (Panel Discussion) Publications -- Real Estate Appraisal Practice (book): Acknowledgement -- Articles for Finance & Commerce and Minnesota Real Estate Journal Page 76 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Hakanson Anderson April 5, 2024 Chens 668 Property, LLC Atten: Tony Chen 21873 Majestic Drive St. August, MN 55320 Main Office: 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763/427-5860 www.haa-inc.com Re: City of Monticello School Boulevard Improvements Dear Mr. Chen: 45 4 This is a follow-up to our March 22, 2024 letter regarding the School Boulevard Improvement Project in Monticello, Minnesota. As discussed in our previous letter, the City of Monticello plans to reconstruct the intersections at School Boulevard and Cedar Street and School Boulevard and Edmonson Avenue. The four-way all stops will be replaced with roundabouts. As part of the project, the City will be requesting some new temporary easement on your property as shown on the attached Exhibit. Attached is the Appraisal Report prepared by Nagell Appraisal, Inc. The City is requesting your consideration of the appraised value of the easement as summarized in the report. The appraised value is $1,100. If you have any questions, please call or email Matt Leonard, the City's Public Works Director, at 763- 271-3271 (matt.leonard(&ci.monticello.mn.us) or me at 763-852-0485 (CraiaJ(&haa-inc.com). Alternatively, you can contact the appraiser, Ethan Waytas, directly at: Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 12805 Highway 55 #300 Plymouth, MN 55441 952-544-8966 952-544-8969 fax Ethan@nagellmn.com Sincerely, T anson Anderson 1 Craig I. Jwhu , Project Engineer cc: Matt Leonard, Public Works Director Ethan Waytas, Nagell Appraisal w Qj arjya14t \ J 302'14.24"w15.55 PARCEL 3 SS'12 / N B Siry °r CO \ \ � i ✓ � (�� f ICJ V �v, .T w�1 DATE REVISION 02/07/24 Revise Temporary Easement Easement Exhibit City of Monticello PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across that part of Lot 2, Block 1, MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 4TH ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota; lying Northwesterly and Westerly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the most Northerly comer of said Lot 2; thence South 63 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds East, assumed bearing along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 10.15 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 44 degrees 22 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 43.82 feet; thence southwesterly 74.56 feet along a non —tangential curve concave to the southeast, said curve having a radius of 952.93 feet, a central angle of 04 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds and a chord that bears South 31 degrees 39 minutes 44 seconds West; thence South 02 degrees 14 minutes 24 seconds West, not tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 15.55 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. Property Owner: CHENS 668 PROPERTY LLC PIN # 155207001020 9350 CEDAR STREET W ■ 30 0 30 60 Proposed Temporary SCALE IN FEET V1111A Easement = 597 SF I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared DESIGNED fff: BP H k s o Anderson SHEET P a rce 1 3 by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly a a n n Licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of nesota. DRAWN B': JJ Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 OF Right of Way and i — )01D�' 763-427-5860 FAX 7-0520 Easement Exhibit B Person Date 01/18/24 U, No. 49138 BP c.com www.haa—ino com DATE 01/18/24 FILE NO. MO305 SHEETS Report Type Appraisal Report File # G2403013 - Parcel 3 Ni Effective Date March 28, 2024 Prepared By: Ethan Waytas, MAI, Appraiser William R. Waytas, Appraiser Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 12805 Highway 55, Suite 300 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Tel:952.544.8966 1 Fax:952.544.8969 NAGELL APPRAISAL INCORPORATED 12805 Highway 55, #300 Plymouth, MN 55441 Established in 1968 City of Monticello Attn: Matt Leonard, Public Works Director, City of Monticello 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362 To Matt Leonard: Phone: 952-544-8966 Fax: 952-544-8969 April 5, 2024 In accordance with your request, an appraisal report has been made on the following described property: Subject Property: Commercial 9350 Cedar Street Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 Described below is a summary of the appraisal report contained herein. Property Overview The City of Monticello is a reconstruction of School Boulevard. Per the city project website, the purpose of the project is to "Increase pedestrian safety and reduce potential conflict points along the School Boulevard corridor." Improvements include a new pedestrian crossing at the Meadow Oak Avenue and Fenning Avenue roundabout crossing Fenning Avenue, extension of the sidewalk in -front of Eastview Education Center connecting south to School Boulevard to help with bus drop-off and pick-up, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard at Pelican Lane, removal of pedestrian crossing on School Boulevard at Eider Lane, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard between Eider Lane and Fallon Avenue, improvements to the School Boulevard High School entrance to include right -turn channelization for vehicles exiting the parking lot and a refuge island for pedestrians, install radar feedback speed signs on School Boulevard, and extend trail on the south side of School Boulevard between Cardinal Hills Park and Fenning Avenue. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring new right-of-way, permanent easement, and temporary easements. The subject is improved with a single -tenant commercial building. County information indicates the building was constructed in 2013 and has 7,905 SF of gross building area. The gross site area is 33,106 SF (0.76 acres). The proposed project was concluded to not impact the subject building improvements. Therefore, only the land and any site improvements in the acquisition area are analyzed to conclude to damages. This report reflects the data found and the opinions concluded from a before and after value appraisal of the subject property (land only). Intended Use Acquisition negotiation purposes by the city Intended User(s) City of Monticello iii Letter of Transmittal - Continued Extraordinary Assumptions None Hvpothetical Conditions Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Propertv Riqhts Appraised - Fee Simple Interest: The subject is used for commercial purposes. Given the scope of the assignment, the appraisal reflects the fee simple interest. Property Components Appraised - Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. - Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment (FF&E): The appraised value does not include personal property or FF&E. - Business Value: The appraised value does not include business value. Hiqhest and Best Use Conclusions - As Vacant: Develop with a commercial use if the site was vacant. - As Improved: Not applicable given the scope of the assignment. Valuation Methodoloqv Given the nature of the project, only the land is being appraised and any site improvements in the acquisition area. • Before Value: The before condition reflects market value before the proposed acquisition. • After Value: The after value reflects the property after the acquisition which considers any changes in site size, new easements, loss of any site improvements, and/or any severance damages to the remainder (if appropriate). • Temporary Easement: A fair rate of return the property owner should receive for use of the temporary easement area during the easement period, if any. 1V Letter of Transmittal — Continued The property is legally described herein. The appraisal assumes that the property meets all current environmental standards. The appraisal analysis and conclusions are subject to certain limiting conditions and assumptions described herein. The final value opinion, as of March 28, 2024, is: Before Market Value (land value): $350,000 After Market Value (land value): $350,000 DAMAGES DUE TO ACQUSITION: $0 Temporary Easement Cost: $1,045 TOTAL (damages plus temporary easement cost): $1,100 rnd. Exposure Time / Marketina Time Final values reflect "market exposure" time of 12 months before the effective date Exposure Time: of the appraisal. Changes in the market, use, lease and/or building subsequent to the effective appraisal date could impact value. Marketing Time: I Marketing times for appropriately priced properties is generally 12 months +/-. Our company has 10 employees, has been in business since 1968 and has sufficient knowledge, education, experience, resources and/or contacts to competently complete this assignment. The accompanying report contains data secured from my personal investigation and from sources considered to be reliable; however, correctness is not guaranteed. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements contained in this report are true and correct. Neither my employment to make this appraisal, nor the compensation, is contingent upon the value reported. This report has been prepared in conformity with the code of professional ethics and standards of professional appraisal practice of the Appraisal Institute and appraisal standards set forth by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Please contact us if you have further questions. Sincerely, �i Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 www.nagelimn.com William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 V TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS ....................... VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY .................... INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL .................................................... DATE OF APPRAISAL............................................................................. SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT .................................................. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED.......................................................... PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED ............................................. IDENTIFICATION..................................................................................... REAL ESTATE TAXES............................................................................ SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY .............................................. REGIONAL DATA..................................................................................... REGIONAL MAP...................................................................................... CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION ............................................. NEIGHBORHOOD MAP........................................................................... SURROUNDING USES............................................................................ BEFORE ANALYSIS................................................................................ SITE DESCRIPTION................................................................................ ZONINGMAP........................................................................................... ZONING.................................................................................................... FUTURE LAND USE MAP....................................................................... FLOODMAP............................................................................................. AERIAL / PLAT MAP................................................................................ TOPOGRAPHYMAP............................................................................... WETLAND MAP....................................................................................... SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS.................................................................... HIGHEST AND BEST USE...................................................................... COSTAPPROACH................................................................................... INCOME APPROACH.............................................................................. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH....................................................... RECONCILIATION................................................................................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME .................................................. AFTER ANALYSIS................................................................................... PROJECT DESCRIPTION....................................................................... PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP.................................................................... SKETCH OF ACQUISITION..................................................................... PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA ............................................ ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE ..................................................... SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES .................... EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME .................................................. DEFINITIONS........................................................................................... ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES ........................................ EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ...................................... CERTIFICATION...................................................................................... CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER.............................................................. QUALIFICATIONS.................................................................................... .. 7 .. 8 .. 8 .. 8 .. 9 10 10 11 11 12 13 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 40 40 41 56 56 57 58 60 61 62 63 65 65 66 67 67 68 70 71 72 SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS 14 Location: 9350 Cedar Street, Monticello Project: School Boulevard Parcel Number: 2 Appraisal Report: Appraisal Report Current Use: Commercial Extraordinary Assumptions: No, see rear of report for standard assumptions Hypothetical Conditions: Yes, see rear of report Site Area: 33,106 SF (0.76 acres) Building Improvements: Commercial building, constructed in 2013, gross building area of 7,905 SF Current Zoning: B-3, Highway Business (guided RC, Regional Commercial) Highest & Best Use: Future commercial development Personal Property: No personal property included Property Rights Appraised: Fee Simple Right of Way Acquisition: None Existing Prescriptive Area: None Permanent Easement: None Temporary Easement 597 SF Temporary Easement Length: 20 months: April 1, 2024 to December 1, 2025 TOTAL DAMAGES & COSTS: $1,100 rounded Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 7 VALUE TYPE, CONDITION & STABILITY OF PROPERTY Type of Value: This report provides an opinion of Market Value. Condition of Value: This report provides an opinion of the as -is value. Occupancy: The subject is improved with a commercial building. INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL The client intends to use the appraisal for acquisition negotiation purposes. No party, other than the named client and listed intended users, may use or Intended Use: rely upon any part of this report without the prior written authorization of both the named client and the appraiser. This report is not valid unless it contains the original signatures in blue ink. Any unauthorized third party relying upon any portion of this report does so at its own risk. Intended User(s): City of Monticello DATE OF APPRAISAL Effective Date Inspection Date Date of Report March 28, 2024 March 28, 2024 April 5, 2024 Page 8 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT USPAP defines Scope of Work as: The type and extent of research and analyses in an assignment. For each appraisal, appraisal review and appraisal consulting assignment, an appraiser must: 1) Identify the problem to be solved, 2) Determine and perform the scope of work necessary to develop credible assignment results; and 3) Disclose the scope of work in the report. 1) I Provide a reasonably supported value opinion as it relates to the intended use & scope. Per assignment request (retained in workfile), the following degree of research and analysis has 2) been made. The narrative format used is an Appraisal Report, which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2a of USPAP. See individual approaches for further detail. The scope of work for this appraisal includes: a) Property Identification: Public record, plat maps, zoning maps and aerial photographs were used to identify the subject property. b) Property Inspection: A viewina of the subiect property and neiahborhood by the appraiser. Physical factors: Based on property viewing and conversations with the client, city and county officials. Lot size is based on county information. Economic Factors: Consisted of gathering of information from market experts, city and/or county offices, and internet about the region, community, neighborhood, zoning, utilities, and any pending projects in the area that may affect the subject property. • c) Extent of Data Researched: Sales data of competing properties within the subject 3) market area were given primary consideration. The most relevant data is used in this report. Sources include, appraiser data files, assessor, internet, developers, agents, MLS, periodicals, in -office library, etc. In addition, during the course of appraisal practice and of this appraisal process, the appraiser has had ongoing discussions with market participants (buyers, sellers, property managers, real estate agents/brokers, appraisers, etc.) and/or viewed market data in relation to how the current real estate market may impact the subject value. The appraiser has not researched the title or ownership records. • d) Type and Extent of Analysis Applied at Opinions or Conclusions: An extensive review of market data was performed. The most recent, similar and proximate data has been used. The data used will be adjusted on a grid. Reasonable and appropriate collection, verification, analysis and viewing has been performed in the valuation approaches, given the purpose and intended use of the report. A final value opinion will be discussed and correlated. The data used was obtained from sources considered credible, yet its accuracy is not guaranteed. If found otherwise, value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 9 I PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED What is valued in a real property appraisal is an estate subject to specified interests. Therefore, an appraiser's task is to identify not only the estate (e.g., the fee simple estate, the leasehold estate, the leased fee estate, the life estate) but also the interests associated with the real estate, such as leases, easements, restrictions, encumbrances, reservations, covenants, contracts, declarations, special assessments, ordinances, or other interests of a similar nature. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15tn Edition, Page 59) Fee Simple Interest: Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 71" Edition) Note: This would typically reflect an owner -occupied property. When the property rights appraised are the unencumbered fee simple interest of the real estate, the appraised value is subject to normal easements for drainage, public streets and utilities, if any. The effect of any existing mortgage or delinquent taxes on the subject property has not been considered in this appraisal. Leased Fee Interest: The ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires. (The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7t" Edition) In appraisal practice, the lessor's interest in a property is considered a leased fee regardless of the duration of the lease, the specified rent, the parties to the lease, or any of the terms in the lease contract. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, Page 62) Conclusion of Rights Appraised: The subject is currently used for commercial purposes. Given the scope of the assignment, the fee simple interest will be applied. PROPERTY COMPONENTS APPRAISED Real Estate: The appraised value includes the real estate value opinion. The methods utilized for the real estate valuation include: • Sales Comparison Approach FF&E: The appraised value does not include any values of fixtures, furnishings and equipment. Business Value: There is no business value included in the appraised value. Page 10 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 IDENTIFICATION Address: County PID Legal: Fee Owner: Census Tract #: 9350 Cedar Street Monticello, Wright County, MN 55362 155-207-001020 SECT-14 TWP-121 RANGE-025 MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 4TH LOT-002 BLOCK-001 Chen's 668 Property LLC 1002.06 REAL ESTATE TAXES Taxes, per County Records Payable 2023 Total Effective Tax $20,296 Special Assessments / Solid Waste Fee / Other Total Tax & Assessments: $20,296 Delinquent taxes: None noted COUNTY ASSESSOR'S VALUE Payable 2023 Land $249,700 Building $600,000 TOTAL $849,700 Payable 2024 $21,758 $21,758 Payable 2024 $359,800 $600,000 $959,800 The subject tax ratio is 2.27%. The assessed value and taxes shown above reflect the overall property. The appraised value given in this report assumes any/all special assessments, and/or liens are paid in full and that there are no delinquent taxes, fees, payments, association dues, etc. Should it be found that any of these exist the amount should be deducted from the appraised value. Appraiser did not research these items; typically, a title search would reveal any of these. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 11 SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY Listing History: I The subject does not appear to be currently listed for sale. Sale Price: n/a Sale Date: n/a Buyer. n/a Seller: n/a Sales History: Terms: n/a Source: Public records No reported sales of the subject within the past 3 years. Pending Sale: I None noted or reported. The subject is improved with a single -occupant commercial building that is Building History: occupied by multiple tenants. The structure was built in 2013 and has a total building area of 7,905 SF, per public records. Lease History: I None provided. Leasehold Interest: I None noted Association Dues: The subject is reportedly not part of an association or common interest community (CIC). Page 12 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL DATA Metro Area Regional hub Minneapolis -Saint Paul is the most populous urban area in Minnesota and is composed of 186 cities and townships. Built around the Mississippi, Minnesota and St. Croix rivers, the area is also nicknamed The Twin Cities for its two largest cities, Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Saint Paul is the second largest city in Minnesota, as well as the state capital. The area is part of a larger U.S. Census division named Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI, the country's 16th-largest metropolitan area, composed of eleven counties in Minnesota and two counties in Wisconsin. This larger area, in turn, is enveloped in the U.S. Census combined statistical area called Minneapolis -St. Paul -St. Cloud, MN -WI with an estimated population of 3.65 million people in 2019. In both of the fully developed central cities —Minneapolis and St. Paul —the population has declined due to smaller household sizes, yet growth in other areas of their counties has been more than offsetting. Below is detailed where this growth has occurred: POPULATION Census Census Forecast Growth Growth County 2000 2010 2022 2000 - 2010 2010-2022 total annual total annual Hennepin 1,116,200 1,152,425 1,260,121 3.25% 0.32% 9.35% 0.78% Ramsey 511,035 508,640 536,413 -0.47% -0.05% 5.46% 0.46% m Dakota 355,904 398,552 443,341 11.98% 1.20% 11.24% 0.94% m N Anoka 298,084 330,844 368,864 10.99% 1.10% 11.49% 0.95% c Washington 201,130 238,136 275,912 18.4% 1.84% 15.86% 1.32% d Scott 89,498 129,928 154,520 45.17% 4.52% 18.93% 1.58% Wright 89,986 124,700 148,003 38.58% 3.86% 18.69% 1.56% v Carver 70,205 91,042 110,034 29.68% 2.97% 20.86% 1.74% 0' Sherburne 64,417 88,499 100,824 37.38% 3.74% 13.93% 1.16% U) Chisago 41,101 53,887 57,988 31.11% 3.11% 7.61% 0.63% Total 2,837,560 3,116,653 3,456,020 1 9.84% 0.98% 10.89% 0.91% Overall, the area has experienced moderate to good income growth. Annualized income growth of 2.5% to 4.0% is consistent with national averages. MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME Census Estimate Growth County 2010 2022 2010-2022 total annual Hennepin 59,236 92,595 56.32% 4.69%FD Ramsey 50,136 78,108 55.79% 4.65% m Dakota 69,508 101,360 45.82% 3.82% y Anoka 65,771 95,782 45.63% 3.80% Washington 77,239 110,828 43.49% 3.62% Scott 77,314 118,268 53.00% 4.41% v Wright 66,833 102,980 54.09% 4.51% c Carver 80,173 116,308 45.07% 3.76% ti Sherburne 69,971 96,889 38.47% 3.21 % Chisago 63,810 97,446 52.71 % 4.39% Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 13 Regional Data — continued Economic Trends The current residential interest rates for a typical 30-year mortgage are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Commercial rates are around 7.00% to 8.50%+. Rates are expected to increase to combat inflation. New construction labor costs have steadily increased along with material costs as well, however during the COVID-19 pandemic costs increased drastically due to supply chains not being able to meet demand. Overall, construction costs are at all-time highs. New construction of commercial, industrial, and multi -family is occurring, however, limited office new construction is occurring. Listing prices have been increasing steadily since 2012 +/- and are starting to approach peak levels similar to the market in 2006, which was a period of high seller expectations. However, recent buyer and seller expectations regarding value and list prices appear to be trending towards equilibrium. Although well diversified, the TCMA and surrounding Minnesota economy is not immune to the recent soft/declining trends of the overall economy. k,20 Minnesota Index 0n20 Grc-20 324 32.8 137,1 Ynl] 1.111 Irby 11 Ap, 11 13A.I 1i9,S 110.7 111.S MY 21 tun 11 1.2.3 111.I 4111 A.S 21 1�3,6 144.5 Sg21 IAS,S %Ch.W Man MaM As. 0.7 Yan As. 9.9 Sep2013 S,p2020 S2021 U. S. Index Sp10 II2.9 OR-20 12" ri 124.3 0-20 12" A-21 125A Rb21 12SS M7-21 11" Apr-21 126S MP21 117s P-21 127.9 AA21 12M.9 A339.21 129A SAy21 129.9 %0.W Man MaA A@. 0.4 Y—No 5,3 Source: Minnesota DEED The recent COVID-19 pandemic created a significant drop in the economy due to high unemployment and decreased spending in early 2020. However, spending has increased, employment is recovering, and the COVID-19 vaccines have given markets stability. Page 14 Regional Data — continued EMPLOYMENT & LABOR FRED — Unemployment Rate in Minneapolis -St. Paul -Bloomington, MN -WI (MSA) — Unemployment Rate in Minnesota Unemployment Rate I50 iro7A 10.0 f 7.5 - a 5-0 2.5 00 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1995 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Shaded areas indicate U.S. recessions. Source- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics fred.stlouisfed.org Over the past ten years, unemployment rates have gone from a peak of around 9.0% to near historical lows of around 2% in late 2018. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created a significant spike in the unemployment rate. The most recent data, shown below, indicates that the rate has dropped significantly and is approaching 2019 levels. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 15 Regional Data — continued APARTMENT MARKET Vacancy & Market Asking Rent Per Unit 8.0% Fvecest E1.900 7.5% $1,800 7.0% $1,700 g 8.5% $1,600 8y 60% $1, 500 S 55% $1 d00 5.0% $1,300 l.6% $1 " l.0% $1.100 3.5% I I3 I 1� I 1, 16 1J I 19 19 A I 11 171 13 74 I 2e 15 ?! I 61.000 ■ Vecancv %. N 4 'Mel rienU. � i .,11I .11 Sd aay Mrn>•m i.. Yu70!) CoStar reports that rents have been trending upward consistently for the past 10+ years. The current average asking rate for an apartment unit in the Twin Cities Metro is around $1,398 per month. Vacancy has fluctuated, but was trending downward until 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a spike in vacancy, which has since been declining. However, vacancy is higher due to significant new construction, both in Minneapolis and surrounding suburbs. The following chart shows the annual absorption of apartment units: Absorption Units 5 9 3K s 2KW 0 J�� Costar attar cnev l.w.a.,.a ec. r1am11 Page 16 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued RETAIL MARKET Vacancy Rate \cr Askiii.,4 Hale l n Itr( 4ul'lructfun V L5% O $19.06 per sq. ft. 28,000 sq. ft. Figure I Direct Vacancy Rote and Absorption 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 (200,000) (400,000) �Abwrption Vacancy Sour(e. (BRE Research, Nl 2021 Nct Ah%orplinn 2131771 sq. h. 9 B 7 6 5 d 3 2 1 0 CBRE indicates that current retail vacancy rates have been increasing and asking rent rates have been declining. There has been absorption of vacant space in the market, however, many developers are cautious about new retail construction. Strong locations retain typical demand; more speculative retail construction generally does not occur. Similarly, Cushman & Wakefield also shows stagnating retail asking rents and increasing vacancy R E_ % T R 4 T � �27 S26 2016 2017 201E �Askng Rent S PSF Dyed Vacancy Rate O% 2020 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 17 Regional Data — continued OFFICE MARKET CBRE data shows that asking rents for the overall office market have generally been increasing. This has also corresponded with an increase in vacancy rates as well. With the COVID-19 pandemic, many employers and workers realized that working remotely was a viable option. It is anticipated that many more companies will offer remote work full-time or part-time; this could impact office space as companies need less square footage. The counterpoint, however, is that companies might retain the same space and create social distancing opportunities in case of possible future COVID-19 flare-ups. FIGURE a Historical Vacancy Rates vs Asking Rates Vacancy Rate 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Avg Asking Rate (NNN) $18.50 $18.00 $17.50 $17.00 $16.50 $16.00 $15.50 $15.00 $10.50 $30.00 �p171 �'I'll �D.y'L 'C$ o% C` Downtown Vacancy Suburban Vacancy Downtown Asking Rate -Suburban Asking Rate Source CBRE Research 01 20M_ FIGURE 4: Historical Downtown Vacancy by Class Vacancy Rate 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 032019 0120v 03vv 0., 03202, 012022 0' 2Zov 012023 -Class A -Class B -Class C Suurue: CBRE Re urn^ 012723 FIGURE 5. Historical Suburban Vacancy by Class Vacancy Rate 36% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 032pt9 0,2p20 032p20 C Z02ti 037o 0" 2022 032022 0� 20 L3 -Class A -Class B -Class C Source CBRE Re earcr,. 012023 Page 18 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Regional Data — continued INDUSTRIAL MARKET The industrial market nationwide has seen increases in rental rates and occupancy. Construction costs have been increasing as well, due to shortages created by the COVID-19 pandemic. In Minnesota the trend is similar to the country overall, vacancy has decreased, construction of new buildings is significant, CBRE indicates that vacancy has been dropping, construction starts have increased, and absorption is significant: RGURE 1: Quarterly and Annual Net Absorption vs. Vacancy Net Absorption Vacancy (MSF) 10 7% 9 6% 8 7 5% 6 5 4% 4 3% 3 2 2% 1% 0 — 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Oy, �01 �02 �03 04 —Vacancy Rate �aurce.CBRE Research 012023 Speculative development, per CBRE, has been significant. For example, almost 5,538,000 million square feet of speculative construction occurred in 2021/2021; of this, 9% has been leased. Buildings in 2022 are about 61% leased. It appears the market is supporting speculative industrial development at this time. =IGURE 3: Deliveries, Absorption. and Availability Rate for Speculative Construction SF (000's) 30 35% 25 30% 25% 20 20% 1s 15% 10 10% 5 lid �� Ii 1111A l 5% 0 I)% y� ti� ti� .� , .,O 10 ti0 ,ti'ti ti7 ti~ ,tit titi titi -0, tiL ti� ti0 ti0 10 ti0 ti0 LO 10 ti0 10 10 If, .ti0 ,ti0 10 If, ,ti0 LO O1 d9 O�' O° O1 d1 O�' Op Oti O� C� Cp dti O� C� Cp d~ Spec Deliveries Spec Absorption Spec Availability Rate Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 19 Regional Data — continued Cushman & Wakefield also reports decreasing vacancy rates and significant increases in asking rates for industrial space. OVERALL VACANCY & ASKING RENT le 6P aaaaa� As. r - ?ent a r-- r t� 8% 4% rry Rabe Total construction and absorption has been generally stable, but in 2021 there was significantly more absorption than construction. This would imply there is demand for more industrial space. SPACE DEMAND !DELIVERIES a. 6 N 4 i 2 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 YTD 2023 ■Net Ansorpbon. SF ■Construction Completors SF Page 20 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 REGIONAL MAP St. Stephen ror,, 23 n 'Braham West Sweden N T 0 N St.Wemd6 — MILL LAC 65, Rush CRY: Stanchfield Trade Lake eric Frederic Sartell 25 )n Springy.l.. . . . ....... .. .. . ........ Ncollegeville F 3vdz 05 Wyanett Harris P 0 ,t,lo'� SI,Ci,"d P Luck ..... ........ ........... ........... . . ...... Cambridge* ..... ... ... St C.. I S A N T I Eureka Milltown Spencer Bradford Eta h. Center Or ook Isanti _"tsokp 0 ockvilleE Augusta R B U R N E Orrock 'C.rduria 'Oalsai .4 learwal Taylors I Lake Beck•er ................... .......... . P St Francis ............. Falls C nt ity a er CRY c Llnclstror�� East Bethel Dresser Subject Chisago City gill M• M cello Blk River' Oak Oro Vvyo mki ve �sceola 2�) Annandale Otsego A N 0 'Forest Lake A W I S W R 1 0 _s H T bertylle Ramsey vile East oillinclover Maple Lake' lot!., Farmington t CRY St. Michael o9pr 4 Albion Center Buffalo Ch—plin. Coon Rapid. is I Star Prairie E R I h :North 0"k, Lake Stanton Beine' CentervilleHugo Fork Crow onoSomerset L.k. Park ef Y\Ihft. Bear Darwin Corcoran Brooklyn Park, Beach N.,. Richmond _ Cokedo Rockford Maple Groveu Brooklyn Fridl Shorev vir Dassel Waverly_ M I-N N E S 0 T A C.rd.,. WASHINGTON Sill Howard Lake :* Lake Sarah He. Brighton EY Mahlomedi Ne,,illHope Oak Park Heights S T. C -1 8 JW, Delano loolependen- ]� . . 8 140 h St. Paul _R Crystal Cry fis Pwoutte L Fn, on Hek Orono gil gW-- ood, Elmo E�ypo`rt Roberts Hudson Hammond. .... ......... Ill .. ........................... ...... a ate _C 'a Long Lake a st ,�dc 0.kdall�e V ey Minne polls akelan Wristed ordeal St. Paid Spring Park IlAnnialtordea. Loul Perk IfoWbiodloury .Silver Lake _.Hollywood H. in., �p Afton Minn6trls!W Deephaven' W_ st, Lester Prairie 7�—n..on d woo din. Lake; Shorewood 169 , . . I S-thst.p.ul J: lli� endQt. nir C N Rwhfiis j N Id , I .............................. Chanhassen I Cottage don, rairee River Falls M C L 0 D Waconia 1 cm C A R V E R 4-1 i-2-12- Blo ington, "Eagan brillowpee.. Heights Glencoe 1 America. _ D. Burnsville Creek sairage . Appl� Valloy H-ting . s Ares P I E R C E Hamburg Prior Trimbelle Ellsworth Lake N AuoUrn 36, , ................ Lakeville L, 1:1 T A Jor dan rL - Helena Farmington Arlington alle Plane I 21i Cedar Lake Trenton Bay City S I B L E S C 0 T T 109 19 'Gaylord Rock 20 Red Wing Henderson�,- en de, ............ Cestle ... ....... ... Webster Lansdale i 1 3 1 Gannon Cannon Falls ueur as .............................. .......... 10 0 0 0 D H U E Wheatland Lafayette .1--ington 'Mordg* ornery I 5si Goodhue N I C 0 L L E T Le Carter 1131 L E S u E UA R��C .......... S t I. Peter Cleveland; Cannon City State .Mascta Wn. W�E Farib@uK Zumbrota Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 21 CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Type of neighborhood: Outlying Suburban Northwestern Community Percent built-up: 90% developed (within city limits) Stage of Development: Stable with growth Neighborhood boundaries: City Limits Redevelopment Some new development and updating are occurring Major Transportation: Interstate 94, Highway 25 Single Family Residential 65% Two- & Multi -Family 10% Predominant type & conformity: Commercial/Industrial 15% Other/Vacant/Public Land 10% Total: 100 % Typical property age: New to 75+ years, predominant under 30 years Single -Family Home Sales: $125,000 to $400,000+ Apartment Sales: $40,000 to $80,000+ per unit Office Property Sales: $75 to $125+ per SF Retail Property Sales: $100 to $200+ per SF Industrial Property Sales: $40 to $80+ per SF Capitalization Rates: 7-10% Historic Subject Market: Stable, some growth Neighborhood Trend: Stable, some growth Detrimental influences: No major apparent Area / City: Monticello is located about 45 minutes northwest of Downtown Minneapolis and 40 minutes southeast of St. Cloud. Access to Interstate 94 is conveniently located near the subject parcel. Interstate 94 provides direct access to the Twin Cities Metro Area, St. Cloud, and surrounding communities. Monticello has a reputation as a stable community, with nearby shopping and access to many major roadways. Access to Downtown and surrounding communities is considered average. Major shopping and commerce are located within the City of Monticello. Neighborhood: The subject is located in southern Monticello near the Highway 25 corridor. Surrounding uses include commercial, residential, and future development land. Page 22 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 City & Neighborhood Description — continued Subject City: As of the 2010 census the population was 12,759, in 2000 it was 7,868. This represents a net increase of 62.2% from 2000 to 2010. The 2020 population for the city is 14,455, an increase of 13.3% from 2010. The 2022 population estimate for the city is 14,804, or about an increase of 2.4% from 2020. Median Income 2019 to 2022 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60, 000 $40, 000 $20,000 $0 2019 2020 2021 2022 ■ Minnesota ■ Wright County • Monticello The median income for the city is below county levels and state levels (per Census Bureau). Income has increased in recent years. Median Home Prices: Citv of Monticello Source: NorthstarMLS Stats Median Sales Price Twin Cures Region — Monticello t: $300K $275K $250K $225K . 1-2019 1-2020 1-2021 1-2022 1-2023 1-2024 Twin Cibes Region & Monticello Each Gala print is 12 months d —Ay. Data is from April 1. 2024 AN data from NOM WNLS. Data deemed reliable but not guaranteed. InfoSp ft ®2024 ShowingTme. The median household income for the city is below the Twin Cities Metro. The median home price started to plateau since the start of 2022; this is likely attributed to increasing interest rates. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 23 NEIGHBORHOOD MAP 1 � jl S m ;v mllsusl; p .. R Monticello r4 r1•�L 25 St W w 4� 3t G? 39 e, NW r8Tst Ave NW 1 52 St B �� i80lh 93 We%,� min- o ii g' �i5 75 y r 9a 5� dg�ae Q — r 19 `d1 m Subject — ���0_k P � Farms � I[,—j :-R9ead 88th St 87th Page 24 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 �'�, t , HII- [Hems Wmli- Savannah Ave a4q - I / PfONTecf1_Rntoration•ie-- rPaza Parch •t x �o# a een D'er ologyM K - ! ` 1 Aroplarporrattio*- _X Ilo V� • - .. .. �.r •' �� r Lakella�� _Transmission & Auto p Due.____.__ _ _ f • z QUO �.• AA 'wainMa,e y ., r� DIs Rd Marlis Farm T� i,-d t idwRid » r • i''♦�jME Compan Monticello od Pat,- rt rq.,�.• Dent F.-. Ea g'eRace_ In ALDI �Ema Movie• n hrero tan Theater�� o}auy�gatd�s • • • ,1 ,� Llttl .Fn / Spa`- o tic h . JJ oed a ` Buffalo 1'Jila 1Jing,EvAuIl07 U Sc fool Blvd scl BI Do MonflcelloA.. 77school'B� o PeD6letr�kD m 1 / . S a { a F°0' wo � z L9i :n orhs • ee� t � _ t • .1y t " Sta�hng �e//6erg;ct ` \ Oslund Seam • • ` The Meaco:.s MHC r , / I i t GJtte,� Fallon D� ' � ►r t'riel/yet^,t\\ t , _ �Orehara.�-rw t\. Diamond�Dr r9'Ct� i Kje116ergC1 Kjelltei9 Paik 'Ca bDlesto�� . I � Nate's.Pamting PdkD -. Eaton.CirpE•`, LLC Minneapolis lr� t BSrh St Thelsens Mobile lYi ak'Or ` r-Mechanic gsr4. • G . • t oFj SP�� l 1 W+r *• Hey Girl Beauty Co BEFORE ANALYSIS Page 26 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SITE DESCRIPTION Dimensions: Gross Site Area: Net Site Area: Topography / Low Area: Shape: Soil conditions: Drainage: Utilities: Electricity / Gas: Water / Sanitary Sewer: Off -Site Improvements: Street/Curb-gutter: Sidewalk: Visual Road Condition: Street Lights / Alley: Storm Sewer: Access to site (#) / Frontage Traffic Count: Visibility: Flood hazard zone: Apparent Easements: Encroachments: Unusual Conditions: Use: Land to Building ratio Excess/Surplus Land: Functional Adequacy: Surrounding Uses: Distance to Major Road Rectangular 33,106 SF (0.76 acres), per county, confirmed with aerial GIS measure 33,106 SF (0.76 acres) Somewhat level / None noted Rectangular Assumed to be stable Appears adequate Yes / Yes Public water / Public sanitary sewer Asphalt / Concrete Asphalt and concrete (along School Boulevard), concrete along Cedar Street Dated to Average Standard / None Yes School Boulevard (no access), Cedar Street (shared access with Walmart) The MnDOT traffic count map indicates 6,251 vehicles per day (in 2022) along School Boulevard Average The site does not appear to be in the flood zone, see following map Typical utility and drainage assumed None apparent, no survey provided None noted Commercial n/a None noted Functional site N Commercial E Commercial S Commercial W Commercial About one block west to Highway 25 Comments: The subject is located near the Highway 25 corridor. The site is an outlot to Walmart. The surrounding uses include mostly commercial properties. The subject site has average development appeal. No apparent adverse influences or easements noted or reported. Access to the property is via a shared driveway (assumed easement) with Walmart. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 27 J ,os f ♦ � m III► iin .��. 111\�i�,�. (~ ail ,��11111/�`������� 111 ur►��it 11Hill ► ZONING Subject Zoning: B-3, Highway Business District The purpose of the "B-3" (highway business) district is to provide for Intent (city code): limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Agriculture; active park facilities (public); essential services; passive parks and open space; public buildings or uses; brew pub; business support services; commercial lodging; convenience retail; Permitted Uses: entertainment/recreation, indoor commercial; financial institution; offices, commercial and professional services; personal services; restaurants; retail commercial uses; retail service; specialty eating establishments; Passenger terminal; place of public assembly; auto -repair — minor; commercial self -storage; day care centers; entertain ment/recreation, Conditional Uses/Special outdoor commercial; event center; production brewery or micro - Permit: distillery with taproom or cocktail room; vehicle fuel sales; vehicle sales and rental; veterinary facilities (neighborhood); auto repair - major; land reclamation; wrecker and towing services; Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 29 I Zoning — Continued Offices, Professional and Commercial: 1.0 space for each bedroom, of which one must be enclosed, plus one guest parking Parking: space for every four units General Retail: 1.0 space for each 200 square feet Minimum lot size: None Maximum lot coveraqe: n/a Major Restriction/ Minimum lot width: 100' requirements in this district: Front vard setback: 30 feet Side vard setback: 10 feet interior lot and 20 feet street lot Rear yard setback: 20 feet Maximum buildinq heiqht: 30 feet or 2.0 stories Use: The existing use appears to be allowed and permitted; if found otherwise, the value could differ. Source: Zoning map, city code Page 30 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Future Land Use Map — Continued The RC, Regional Commercial designation is described as the following in the city's comprehensive plan: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) The Regional Commercial designation includes large-scale commercial uses serving a regional market, typically on large sites along the Interstate of major arterials roadways such as State Highway 25. Retail uses within this category usually have large floor areas and high sales volumes and may be considered shopping "destinations" by consumers from the region. Uses such as furniture and electronic stores, farm supply, home improvement stores, department stores, "big box" retailers. hotels and restaurants are included. Smaller and more local -serving retail uses, and personal services are generally not appropriate but could be allowed if complementary to a regional use. Commercial • "Big Box" Stores • Department Stores Hotels • Restaurants Recreational Plaza • Public Space Primary Mode Vehicular with access to collectors and arterials Transit or shuttle service Secondary Mode Shared bike/ pedestrian facilities Comprehensive Plan Conclusion: • Floor Area Ratio y 2018 Correlating (FAR) Zoning District 0.30 to 0.50 B-3 • Height - Highway 1,2 stories. 4 stories Business District for hotels or office B-4 • Lot Area - Regional N/A Business District The subject is guided for a commercial use, which is consistent with the current zoning. Page 32 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 12firereloWhyZi FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Map Number 2705340015E Zone X Map Date August 04, 1988 RIPS 27171 MAPLEGEND 1-1 Areas inundated by 500-year flooding El Areas inundated by 100-year flooding ❑ Velocity Hazard The subject is indicated by the red arrow, the improvements are not located in a flood zone Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 33 AERIAL / PLAT MAP The red outline reflects the subject gross site area, per county. The red arrow indicates the shared access driveway. Page 34 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 TOPOGRAPHY MAP The above topography map is from the MN DNR website. The site appears to be mostly level. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 35 WETLAND MAP PEM1A The above wetland map is from the National Wetlands Inventory website. The subject is indicated by the red arrow. It appears there are no wetland areas. Note: The above exhibit is from the MN DNR NWI Wetland Finder. It is a preliminary wetland map that is not an official wetland delineation. That said, the NWI Wetland Finder is a good resource for the beginning of wetland research. Page 36 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Looking southwest on Cedar Street Looking northwest on School Boulevard Site view Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 37 HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and best use is defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition as, "The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria that the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity". Highest and best use is analyzed in two ways, site as vacant and site as improved. Typically, there are four criteria in highest and best use analysis Legally permissible uses What uses are allowed by zoning? Physically possible uses What uses are physically possible on the site? Financially feasible use Which possible and permissible uses will produce a positive return? Maximally productive use Of the financially feasible uses, which use produces the highest return warranted by the market (the ideal improvements)? Site as Vacant: The use of the real estate based on the presumption that the parcel of land is vacant or can be made vacant by demolishing any improvements (i.e., as vacant or as if vacant). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, page 307) Legally Permissible Uses: The current B-3, Highway Business District zoning allows for primarily commercial uses. The subject is guided for CC, Community Commercial which appears to be similar to the existing zoning. Physically Possible Uses: The subject site is rectangular and has a rectangular building pad area. Visibility and access to the property are rated average. The physical characteristics of the site appear suitable for development. The property has electricity, gas, public water, and public sanitary sewer available. Access to Highway 25 and Interstate 94 is nearby, which is also appealing. Financially Feasible Uses: Typically, surrounding uses, market demand, and availability of financing drive financially feasible uses. Surrounding Uses: Uses in the immediate area are commercial, residential, and future development land. A commercial use would be supported. Financing: Current interest rates range from 7.50% to 8.50%+. Borrowers typically must be well qualified with 20% to 30% down. Financing for owner occupied properties (residential, commercial, industrial, and business) is rated to be average to good. Financing for multi -tenant commercial or office is rated to be average, however, most projects must be substantially pre - leased before lenders will extend financing. The subject is zoned and guided for a commercial use. Financing for new commercial construction is rated to be average, with interest rates ranging from 6.75% to 7.75%+. Loan terms for new construction are typically 20% or more down and 25-year amortization rates. Market Demand: Market demand for commercial land in the subject area is average. The City of Monticello is within commuting distance of the Twin Cities Metro area. The city also has multiple national and regional retailers and medical providers that provide services to residents. Financially Feasible Uses: A commercial development is logical on the site. Given the location and overall size of the subject, development timing is likely now to 2+ years. Page 38 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Highest and Best Use — Continued Maximally Productive Use: The highest and best use as vacant is considered to be for a commercial development as market demand warrants and zoning allows. The subject site is large enough to accommodate a building for either a single user or a multi -tenant building. New construction generally results in average to good quality commercial buildings. Most Probable Buyer: Developer who would construct a commercial building. Valuation Methodology: Commercial land sales will be considered to value the subject. Site as Improved: The use that should be made of the real estate as it exists (i.e., as currently improved or as if improved as proposed). (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15t" Edition, page 307) The subject is improved with a multi -occupant commercial building. This is similar to the highest and best use, as -if vacant. Given the scope of the assignment and acquisition area, this analysis is not applicable. However, a continued commercial use is logical. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 COST APPROACH The subject is being appraised as vacant land; therefore, the Cost Approach is not considered applicable and was not applied. INCOME APPROACH The Income Approach was not applied as rental and capitalization rate data for land like the subject is limited, which renders the approach unreliable. Page 40 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 L-Y-1T10 Tolh In the sales comparison approach, an opinion of market value is developed by comparing properties similar to the subject property that have recently sold, are listed for sale, or are under contract (i.e., for which purchase offers and a deposit have been recently submitted). A major premise of the sales comparison approach is that an opinion of the market value of a property can be supported by studying the market's reaction to comparable and competitive properties. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 351) Supply and Demand: Property prices result from negotiations between buyers and sellers. In a market with many buyers and sellers, buyers make up the market demand the properties offered for sale or lease currently or in the foreseeable future make up the supply. To estimate demand, appraisers consider the number of potential users of a particular type of property, their purchasing power, and their tastes and preferences. To analyze supply, appraisers focus on existing properties that are available on the market as well as properties that are being constructed, converted, or planned. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Substitution: The principle of substation holds that the value of property tends to be set by the cost of acquiring a substitute or alternative property of similar utility and desirability within a reasonable amount of time. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Balance: The forces of supply and demand tend toward equilibrium, or balance, in the market, but absolute equilibrium is almost never attained. Due to shifts in population, purchasing power, consumer tastes and preferences, and many other factors, demand varies greatly over time. The construction of new buildings, conversion of existing buildings to other uses, and demolition of old buildings cause supply to vary as well. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 352) Externalities: External forces affect all types of property in positive or negative ways. Periods of economic growth and economic decline influence property values. Appraisers analyze the market area of the subject property to identify all significant external influences. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 353) When possible, select comparables with similar location, economic conditions and support facilities. Land Value: "Sales comparison is usually the preferred method for developing an opinion of site value. When this method is used, most of the techniques for selecting comparable sales and making adjustments that are described in Chapter 20 can be applied to site valuation. When there are not enough sales of similar parcels for the application of sales comparison, alternative methods such as market extraction, allocation, land residual analysis, and various income capitalization techniques may be used". (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 339) The Following Outline Is Used In The Sales Comparison Approach: - A location map of the comparable sales. - Comparable sales are listed. - An adjustment grid using the comparable sales. - A discussion of adjustment and conclusion of value. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 41 Comparable Location Map Primary Comparable Selection/Search Criteria: • Primary emphasis on commercial land sales • Sale date of January 1, 2021 +, older sales may be considered • 30,000 SF to 150,000 SF+ • Data from competing communities • In some instances, older data and/or data from competing communities will be utilized due to proximity to the subject and other characteristics similar to the subject. Tot L't 24 S1 Becker' Snuffy's Landing- * ` Hasty Enfield b r e Lake Maria Silver Craeke State Park Land Sale 1 Maple Lake Muni Airport al - — 4 7 Sand Dunes i.................................. w. 70 � �E�agc{'ee :F a Irk ..� 1 .I • 24 ...Salida Pn;.a '11 p } a �Parf:- Prdrrl eadows Park III 1 '- BI Lake—�--- — --••__ --___- - -- Land Sale 2 13 ' Corneliu armorial Park iveFpla¢k— np -T • nd Sale 5 :. Iv Elk � ........................ '..Mississippi Oaks Park La 5 a Buffalo Municipal Hanover Park }Airport d Ra=at 35 is 1 F,'odca Hills:. Park ; 2D 6*\77� • Hettc-n,r 6.er Parr• ,F>' ckford wavarly. _ Cdke Rebecca_ '..I HeigF.rts Park 83 and Sale 3 42 58 1 riville ::�.. 36 - Land Sale 4 --- 241 144 _ _...• .,. e�rtiag'Mlil�-_ Diaaland Dayt n : ` \ ss lake`', rw-HaGaOowa Park mMy Pa�.............,1 Rogers 203 121 J M1 a. 117 11a' - - r 'Jj109t 81 Ll4- d� M o Pa k E N IN E,P I Page 42 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sale Comparison Approach — Continued Sale Comparable 1 Aerial Image Address: XXXX Deegan Avenue, Monticello '!'lid- • t .. - x r — 414 s .. 1fcC��•.� ,r V r -. '4 , .. _ RN r i The land sale is indicated by the red arrow. Surrounding uses include a movie theater, Walmart, and other commercial. In the greater area is future development land and single-family residential. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 43 I Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Proaerty Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #1 RedSo Land'. 0 bwm JI 25 Tooth St �ja8h� Mth S` i U XXXX Deegan Avenue, Monticello 155-176-001020 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 117,612 SF Improvements: None Commercial land parcel located along Highway 25. The property is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. Access to the site is via a backage road (no direct access to Highway 25). $930,440 July 21, 2021 Daniel Thomas Robbins City of Monticello Price /Acre: Sale Terms: Sale Conditions: Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $7.91 per SF Cash Typical RediComps, Costar / CREV Page 44 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 mod; . .�� Mississippi i Moose Sher�itt>' ce Are . + `� -•.,p � ,River Parr k a c ' ._ Swan Park . Ecumen St. Benedict's > Community ---- thst Bondhus Coror St Henry Catholic Church , .a• ' I+� '� p M, a, s e Home DePo ♦ Ultimate a' — ♦ ■ Undercoati ar halls u ��9 E 7th'St him�acie�, Elemts • w"�,_ SunnyDays Therapy ♦ RiuerWood a e Ban. i esota t ' W reless W • r Verizo naiology orize Retailer •,� enzon oriticello etSma Do raj i g �; ♦ Ma�,rress Firrc j i,;ends $ A� Fam,l'y Discount U� .► Pa�jit� 0 ' • UM (• Itra ` �� Com anies Fleet Farm ehirnng'G�o YY"� p Monticello Baseball Park tticello •, , p, LU lic•'e `° ` OMor lllot'Migh Sch00, . Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #2 Land Sale 2 APPr Dr 1 62�' fee Ra StF 1e 19 _ s \ oak A Property Data Address: XXXX 7th Street East, Monticello 155-212-001010 PID/Legal Description: Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Description: Average Utilities: Public Physical Characteristics: 67,147 SF Improvements: n/a Site Size: Commercial land located just south of Home Depot. The property has frontage and exposure to Comments: Interstate 94. The property has average development appeal. Sale Data Sale Price: $550,000 Price /SF: $8.19 per SF Sale/Close Date: August 30, 2022 Sale Terms: New Mortgage Buyer: MoCnticello 7th Street East LL Sale Conditions: Typical Seller: Ryan Companies US, Inc. Source/Verification: RediComps / CREV Comments: The property was listed on the open market. Page 46 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Tamis Daycare J Kali Ave NE ra ` a Z. ro ro 0 � —pd Kingston Cro �C r I > d w ZCL a" m NE 53rd St NE m _ 53rd St NE The Goddard5c'bl' o Albertville ( r car X N ' �., Pet Nation Veterinary • �' Care Center z c H g ' The Hen 8'The ,.. MEId, • l~ ' ;M SunnyDays Therapy, s _51stSt Orthodo tic tdk ♦' Parkway Dash Towing Se-, -e { Lira`1• y ...JJ7 .- Jason Ave NE 50th St NE n w Z M 0- i Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #3 l jjJJII �` St NE i5x - Ot NE 37� `09 Gist $tN � � •q � � Fa" ror.�tz < a� rk d - - 57th St N 'Ave NE � oaVsiae Fares � 55th St NE Land Sale 3 53rd S[ NE b d St NE 2 S7s II 4 NE — Four seasons Park r c 1 4I Property Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: 5292 Kyler Avenue Northeast, Albertville 101-137-001010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 61,463 SF Improvements: None Commercial land parcel located along County Road 19 (Labeaux Avenue Northeast). The property is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. Access to the site is via a backage road (no direct access to County Road 19). $449,000 January 12, 2024 Ortiz Properties LLC Cheney Properties LLC Price /SF: Sale Terms: Sale Conditions: Source/Verification The property was listed on the open market. $7.31 per SF New Mortgage Typical RediComps, MLS, CREV Page 48 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Roge s Pet'Clink ♦ Cub Roger !_ '+ otVC7 !. , Bedroc oto sue' M F rniture, � , � 4 North t_ Community Park r AngelrHand. ba 137.t Ave. Midwest Ur ent'Care--• co coerce eb The Preserve • a Commerce TwilightiTr�,� TGK A to o iive + o i Cnar ge Se vice limpE agi a ogers. ; „ , Fro 'Q 1 �•.r +� Maynard's l'o ,, Ha,� ,'j► ;, ,, fir. " �: •"' , � - Holidayinn Express & Suites < d Cafe z tQ - Q ort o'�T� • atr ry The Crown F�oo r f& rink- Hall Hampton Inn Suite_ s Roge s J *, * l e S Diamond Lake Rd r - - S Diamond a is r c ' ♦ RichardSl o� o Ca • D�n 's , d� T = °o � 34t A've P34$ d�ei , * �' • +L TA ravel GYeat N Eggi istribu 94 7' 96rs i i� INI 94 all O O �'. � _ ® �' .po9 ♦ 'Wn°�i,�e �v►.. �j. y`er "� Rye tal � '/ �I dill lyFrozen A� ��. y�•, . t'�.-:. ...:�F a A� 1 �ri a •"IFi� Cus�rd & Steakburgers Bi 1 Advanced 4- Tryou�Jalapeno A \ joy ResppOnS - stems i enes' GrOEBNEYRry \y�' - Ha, 'r,� refight To s� i Csorpo-ate Headquarters P .•, Rogers True value Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Land Sale Comparable #4 Ibrth Community Park tttttt Nokh mmunity Feik 1 Il Land Sale 9 : , l.- l� _ -- -" n 48 52 i i •�' .• ■. t Property Data Address: 21035 135th Avenue N, Rogers PID/Legal Description: 14-120-23-41-0015 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Description: Average Utilities: Public Physical Characteristics: 32,670 SF Improvements: None Site Size: Comments: Commercial site that is mostly rectangular and has average development appeal. The property is just east of Highway 101. Sale Data Sale Price: $392,040 Price /SF: $12.00 per SF Sale/Close Date: November 22, 2023 Sale Terms: Cash Buyer: Northland Salons Rogers Sale Conditions: Typical Owner LLC Seller: LHJery Incorporated Source/Verification: RediComps / CREV Comments: The property was listed on the open market. Page 50 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ' Fj t orl-FHaystationstore' Cad wash p -0 %r Circ e.K Polar Pop a 0ARO County Rtl 39 NE County Rtl 9 NE County Rd✓39tN 101 Market, • Coborn's,Groee Christ Churco h Otse o .7 • Store Ot' e / g ---i-- 89th'StNE CranyboA Lavenderr y ��• �• '^ Lades&tJ_-= m Vicki's Family Daycare lot , St NE_• • • ,i 1 w `—. et "�11 Great Clips _ Z �, .}•, Get the Cut You Love d • P c y' Lennar at Parrish �� a Mechanical • A Meadows, QaALDI • and Conlin L g F L Park, w � m edtherap.y� , r gym, i 8•,h,5 87tSI E— • � `� • TiresoPlus (Book An Oil 2 • B7thTLn :� C�en9e Appoi t a. M► Due N rthrCa Wash , n� - •• The Village of Ot'se�o . . w 85th+SNNE � 85th,StP&F Maehining,i' � EDCO Products, -Inc yc t •r • � ' g a� � •,,� � aaitnst A 111ff d pa ♦ CM . Curious Stars w f_ Coil care Center _ ► r' ;, . D a eb _ e! m •i— Ida `� School no1liPark ♦ CP d^ , \�pve'NF ge and All Drywall- LifeGate Chyrc Service' 2 W Otsego Elementry Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Proaerty Data Address: PID/Legal Description: Description: Physical Characteristics: Site Size: Comments: Sale Data Sale Price: Sale/Close Date Buyer: Seller: Comments: Land Sale Comparable #5 x 92nd St NE Y� d pii I4 88th St NE Land Sale 5 - -- JL es - - 1011 79th 4 8690 Parkview Avenue, Otsego 118-360-027010 Land parcel Zoning/Intended Use: Commercial Average Utilities: Public 98,445 SF Improvements: None Commercial site located just to the southwest of Target. Surrounding uses include commercial and residential. The site has average development appeal. $1,000,000 March 7, 2024 Price /SF: Sale Terms: Java Otsego Retail 2.0 LLC Sale Conditions: Tamarack Land - Parrish Source/Verification Meadows, LLC The property was listed on the open market. $10.16 per SF New Mortgage Typical RediComps / CREV Page 52 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Listed below is the adjustment grid for the comparables listed on the previous pages. Comparable items of significant difference are adjusted for. Description Subject 1 2 3 4 5 9350 )000( >000( 5292 21035 8690 Address Cedar Street Deegan Avenue 7th Street E Kyler Avenue NE 135th Avenue N Parkview Avenue Monticello Monticello Monticello Albertville Rogers Otsego Proximity Subject 0.21 mi SW 1.37 mi NE 7.96 mi SE 13.6 mi SE 11.5 mi E (Financing Market Cash New Mortgage New Mortgage Cash New Mortgage Conditions Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical Market Conditions -- Jul-21 Aug-22 Jan-24 Nov-23 Mar-24 Location Average Fair Fair Fair Good Average (Zoning/Use Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Phys Char Average Average Average Average Average Average (Improvements n/a None n/a None None None Size Age Condition Utilities Public Public Public Public Public Public (Sale Price $930,440 $550,000 $449,000 $392,040 $1,000,000 Site Size (SF) 33,106 117,612 67,147 61,463 32,670 98,445 Price per SF - Site Size $7.91 $8.19 $7.31 $12.00 $10.16 Cond. Adj. +/- Financing Market (Conditions Typical Market Conditions 5.37% 3.16% 0.42% 0.70% 0.12% Net Cond. Adj. 5.37% 3.16% 0.42% 0.70% 0.12% Effective $/SF -Site Size $8.34 $8.45 $7.34 $12.08 $10.17 Adjustments Location Average 10% 10% 10% -10% (Zoning/Use Commercial Phys Char Average (Improvements n/a Utilities Public Site Size (SF) 33,106 5% 5% 5% 5% Net Adjustment 15% 15% 15% -10°% 5% Adjusted Price per SF - Site Size $9.59 $9.72 $8.44 $10.88 $10.68 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 53 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Discussion of Adjustments Property Rights: Refers to the ownership interest conveyed at the time of sale. Properties with leases or other encumbrances in place can sell for more or less than comparable properties that sell fee simple interest. • All transactions were fee simple, no adjustment warranted. Financing: The impact financing may have had on the sale price, favorable interest rate or term. • All sales were cash or estimated to be near or at market rates. Conditions of sale: Reflects non -market conditions, which may or may not have impacted the sale price, such as differing motivations of buyer or seller (related parties, distressed or liquidation sale, listings, pending, occupancy, assemblage, etc.), impending eminent domain proceedings, influence due to tax ramifications, or lack of market exposure. • All transactions appear to be typical transactions, no adjustment warranted. Market Conditions: Based on a variety of data, the appraiser concludes to an annual appreciation rate of 2%. This rate is applied accordingly to the sales comparables. Location: This adjustment is based on the appraiser's judgment. It takes into consideration surrounding land uses, intended use, neighborhood characteristics, traffic, exposure and access. • Comparable 1 adjusted upward for circuitous access • Comparable 2 adjusted upward for less appealing location relative to the subject • Comparable 3 adjusted for less appealing location relative to the subject • Comparable 4 adjusted downward for superior location Zoning/Use: • The subject and comparables are rated similar, no adjustment. Physical Characteristics: Shape and topography adjustments reflect the market preference for mostly rectangular and level parcels, which optimize development potential. • The subject and comparables are rated similar, no adjustment. Page 54 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Sales Comparison Approach — continued Improvements: • The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Utilities: • The subject and comparables are considered competing, no adjustment. Site Size: Adjustments recognize larger parcels of land typically sell for less per SF than smaller sites. Comparables adjusted accordingly. • The adjustment is based on discussions with market participants as well as previously observed sales. Conclusion: The comparables used are rated to be the most indicative of data analyzed and bracket the subject value. Other sales reviewed were older, further and/or needed more adjustment. Adjustments are made on a per SF basis. The comparables utilized in this analysis each have several similar characteristics in common with the subject. While none are totally identical to the subject, each represents a viable alternative to a prospective buyer of the subject property and, after adjustment, can be utilized as an indicator of market value for the subject property. Indicator Un-adiusted Price per SF Range $7.31 - $12.00 Average $9.11 Median $8.19 Adiusted Price per SF $8.44 - $10.88 $9.86 $9.72 The comparables are given approximately equal weight. Considering the above data, the subject location, characteristics, quality, powerline easement, and the current market conditions, a value near the upper range is considered appropriate. Site Size (SF) 33,106 Indicated Value (land only) Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Value per SF Total $10.50 $347,613 $350,000 (rnd.) Page 55 I RECONCILIATION Cost Approach Not Applied Sales Comparison Approach $350,000 Income Approach Not Applied The Cost Approach to value was not applied as the subject is being appraised as vacant land. The Direct Sales Comparison Approach to value analyzed recent sales of properties as compared with the characteristics of the subject property. Adjustments were made to the comparables to make them as similar to the subject as possible. This results in an indication of market value at which a typical buyer would be willing to pay for the subject property. Quality and quantity of data rated to be average. The Income Approach was not utilized due to limited rents and capitalization rates of properties similar to the subject. Conclusion: The Sales Comparison Approach is given the most weight. Data quantity and quality was rated to be average. Final Value Opinion (BEFORE) The value opinion is: $350,000 EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME Reasonable Exposure Time: Typically 12 months before Marketing Time Opinion: 12 months +/- after the effective the effective date of the appraisal. date of the appraisal. Page 56 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 AFTER ANALYSIS The neighborhood, site, regional, aerial, comparables, etc. descriptions are the same in the before as the after (unless otherwise noted on the following pages). The highest and best use of the site as vacant is for commercial development as market demand warrants and zoning allows. The highest and best use of the site as improved is not applicable. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 57 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Monticello is a reconstruction of School Boulevard. Per the city project website, the purpose of the project is to "Increase pedestrian safety and reduce potential conflict points along the School Boulevard corridor." Improvements include a new pedestrian crossing at the Meadow Oak Avenue and Fenning Avenue roundabout crossing Fenning Avenue, extension of the sidewalk in -front of Eastview Education Center connecting south to School Boulevard to help with bus drop-off and pick-up, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard at Pelican Lane, removal of pedestrian crossing on School Boulevard at Eider Lane, enhanced pedestrian crossing with center refuge island on School Boulevard between Eider Lane and Fallon Avenue, improvements to the School Boulevard High School entrance to include right -turn channelization for vehicles exiting the parking lot and a refuge island for pedestrians, install radar feedback speed signs on School Boulevard, and extend trail on the south side of School Boulevard between Cardinal Hills Park and Fenning Avenue. As a result of the project, the city is acquiring new right-of-way, permanent easement, and temporary easements. Description of the acquisition areas and types: Right-of-Wav Acquisition (ROW): Used for right of way related purposes (road construction, ponding, etc.). The city will acquire this area in fee; the property owner does not retain any ownership rights. The city reported the following ROW for the project. Site Size — Before 1 33,106 SF Acquisition Area — ROW 1 0 SF Site Size - After 1 33,106 SF Permanent Easement: The easement area is used for sidewalk/trail purposes. The subject owner remains the underlying owner of the area. The city reports the following for permanent easement area: Total Permanent Easement None Page 58 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Project Description — Continued Temporary Easement: Used for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. A market rate of return will be found for the time period that the temporary easement exists. Because the owner retains ownership of the temporary easement area, it is not applicable to subtract it as a loss from the "Before" site size. For the specific subject parcel, it appears that the sloping after the project will be similar to the sloping before the project with minimal changes. However, because changes can occur during actual construction, the appraiser reserves the right to reconsider damages if the slope exceeds 1 to 4 in the after condition. The temporary easement length is anticipated to last 20 months. Temporary Easement Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 597 SF Page 59 I amping World • Middle hool +- 4 � v � Seamless Gutters in..Tow n9-Nz- ' .`-'\ .J Mississippi yP R, 94 i �,�� / '. Riverrk Pa jh w io lund Bus,Company_ St Henr�C tholic.Church94 , ` • 1 _ Ukiiwate . Jlf Lube The Home,Depo -.. • � Unde'•oatin ��' i Polaris MCO - .SSD Off At � 4� � ' �-�Un - - uut o 1 U,M Ultra ".fin ln� ]g : 1 ranyl SERVPRO o Flee. Fans 81 • ount r J _ y .40 ALDI Monticello Igh°Sch00i 14. `' 1� Shop Your Local ALDI • - i-- I t R '� - 1 t rt ;Uri Little ountaijn,,• t T he °Elementary" , JamiscnAve.N M. rr,lty it Mon rvieiv, owntain Y : ' Bike Challenge Cours r, Pioneer Park r 1 r 1 r_ Thei a r I� The Bouncy House Guy, , reengilneered, inc i 0. SKETCH OF ACQUISITION \ t 7. PARCEL 3 •i� I Easement Exhibit �o r City of Monticello Property Owner: CHENS 668 PROPERTY LLC PIN# 155207001020 9350 CEDAR STREET HOkO...oa_Anderson rt , / Parcel 3 ' Hight of Way and ` Ees t E hibd The proposed right-of-way acquisition is outlined in red. The city indicates the proposed right-of-way acquisition is 0 SF. The new permanent easement area is outlined in blue. The city indicates the permanent easement is 0 SF. The new temporary easement area is outlined in green. The city indicates the temporary easement is 597 SF. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 61 PHOTOGRAPHS OF ACQUISITION AREA Acquisition Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Acquisition Area (red arrows indicate approximate location) Page 62 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ASPECTS OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE Potential aspects of damage or loss in value to the subject property caused by the partial acquisition: - Land within the acquired area - Buildings located within the acquired area - Site improvements within the acquired area - Severance damage, the influence of the acquisition area on the subject property - Project Influence Land - Land value breakdown -- On the basis that all portions of the subject site have equal value contribution the subject's land value in the taking area is diminished by the pro -rated value of the land acquired. Buildings — There are no building improvements in the acquisition area. Site improvements — Based on an inspection, see below chart for site improvements, if any, that are impacted by the acquisition. The city will move and/or replace in kind any wells, septic systems, underground watering systems, and fences as needed. Site Improvements Description Type/Size/Condition Quantity/Rate Total Opinion of Market Value Trees None $0 Plantings None None None None None $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Driveway/Fence Underground Watering System Sign TOTAL $0 Note: The city is to maintain access to the subject during the project period. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 63 Aspects of Potential Damage — continued Severance damage — Given the current site layout and use, there is no severance damage to the remainder as a result of the acquisition. It is the appraiser's opinion the proposed acquisition as described in this report will not have an adverse effect on the marketability or value of the remainder due to the acquisition. See chart below. Primary Factors Considered for Estimating Potential Severance Site Characteristics Before After Location Average Average Access Average Average Street Improvements Trail Ponding Utilities Elevation Drainage Retaining Wall Sound Wall Fence House/Building Proximity to Road/ROW, approximate Site / Development Appeal Highest and Best Use Dated to Average Asphalt and concrete along School Boulevard None Public Average Average None None None n/a Average Some new Asphalt and concrete along School Boulevard None Public Average Average None None None n/a Average Commercial development Commercial development Net Impact Nil Nil Benefit not considered Nil M kv Nil *Appraised value does not give consideration to any benefit to the subject as result of the proposed project. Severance Discussion: Based on the above chart analysis, there is no severance damage to the remainder. The highest and best use of the subject in the before and the after is considered to be the same. Project Influence - The subject will have reasonable and suitable access throughout the project. The proposed project is considered typical. An informed buyer/property owner is aware that any property is subject to occasional disturbances due to various projects over the course of time; such as road upgrades, utility improvements, other infrastructure maintenance, construction/razing of buildings, renovations to the noted property, etc. Page 64 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 SUMMARY OPINION OF BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES ROW Acquisition: Acquired for road purposes. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 100% loss in value. The new ROW area is reported to be 0 SF. Permanent Easement Acquisition: The easement area is used for sidewalk/trail purposes. The new easement area is reported to be 0 SF. It is estimated the land area will suffer a 95% loss in value. Temporary Easement: Used by the city for construction purposes on a temporary basis. The owner retains complete ownership upon expiration of the temporary easement. The city reports that the temporary easement will be 597 SF. Summary of Acquisition Estimate of Value Before Acquisition Land Value Site Improvements See below Total Value BEFORE Acquisition Estimate of Value After Acquisition Total Value Before Acquisition, Land Only & Improvements in Acquisition Area L ROW Acquisition Area 0 SF x $10.50 per SF x 100% loss = Prescriptive Easement Area 0 SF x$10.50 per SF x 100% loss = Permanent Easement 0 SF x$10.50 per SF x95% loss = Site Improvements None Severance Total Value AFTER Acquisition Temporary Easement TOTAL DAMAGES AND COSTS (rounded) Alternate Computation ROW Acqusition Area Prescriptive Easement Area Permanent Easement Site Improvements Severance Temporary Easement - Low Area None Net Value Before Severance Total Damages 597 SF x $10.50 per SF x 10% x 20 months = $1,045 Total Temporary Easement Cost 0 SF x $10.50 per SF x 100% rights loss= 0 SF x $0.15 per SF x 100% rights loss= 0 SF x $10.50 per SF x 100% rights loss= None 597 SF x $10.50 per SF x 10% x 20 months = $1,045 Total (rounded) *Slight deviations may exist due to rounding. EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME $350,000 $0 $350,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000 ($1,045) $1,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,045 $1,100 Reasonable Exposure Time: 12 months before the Marketing Time Opinion: 12 months +/- after the effective date of the appraisal. effective date of the appraisal. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 65 DEFINITIONS MARKET VALUE - The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (A) buyer and seller are typically motivated, (B) both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (C) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market, (D) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (E) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition. Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — The right to use another's land for a stated purpose. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute EASEMENT (definition) — An interest in real property that conveys use but not ownership to a portion of a property. Common easements include but are not limited to access, utility, and right of way. Specialty easements include but are not limited to conservation, preservation, aerial, and flowage. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition. Appraisal Institute TEMPORARY EASEMENT (definition) — An easement granted for a specific purpose and applicable for a specific time period. A construction easement, for example, is terminated after the construction of the improvement and the unencumbered fee interest in the land reverts to the owner. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Seventh Edition. Appraisal Institute Page 66 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL ISSUES Regarding any adverse environmental and/or improvement structural conditions (such as, but not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, mold, construction defects or inadequacies, etc.) present in the improvements, on the site, or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: None are apparent, however, appraiser is not an expert in this field. Value assumes no hazardous or structural conditions exist. Value assumes any abandoned wells will be properly sealed. If any of these conditions exist the appraised value could differ significantly. EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS As stated by USPAP; Extraordinary Assumption: An assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions of conclusions. None Hypothetical Condition: That which is contrary to what exists but is supposed for the purpose of analysis. Values in this appraisal analysis are based on the Before and After value conditions occurring on the same date (effective date of this report). After value condition assumes the proposed project is completed as described. If found otherwise, the value could differ. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 67 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. The appraisers assume no responsibility for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor do the appraisers render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership and good management. 2. The furnished legal description is assumed to be correct. 3. Any sketch in the report may show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraisers have made no survey of the property. It is assumed unless otherwise noted that no survey has been viewed and that all improvements are located within the legally described property. 4. The appraisers are not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made the appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. 5. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of value for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 6. The appraisers assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraisers assume no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering, which might be required to discover such factors. 7. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, radon gas, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 8. Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the appraisers, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, the appraisers can assume no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished to the appraisers. 9. Disclosure of the contents of the appraisal report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which the appraisers are affiliated. No part of the contents of this report, or copy thereof (including conclusions as to the property value, the identity of the appraiser, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organizations, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected), shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or any other public means of communications without the prior written consent and approval of the appraisers. Page 68 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Assumptions & Limiting Conditions — continued 10. The appraisers have no present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised; and neither the employment to make the appraisal, nor the compensation for it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property. The appraisers have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. 11. The appraiser has personally inspected the subject site (unless noted otherwise). The comparable sales data has been viewed via aerial maps, photographs and/or online street views along with file pictures, when available. To the best of the appraiser's knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this report are true and correct, and the appraisers have not knowingly withheld any significant information. 12. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The appraisal is for the sole use of the named client. 13. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of the property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider possible non-compliance with the requirements of ADA in estimating the value of the property. 14. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the reported analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report was prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 15. The appraised value opinion assumes all leases (if any) are current and paid in full as of the effective date of the appraisal. 16. Excel grids and tables may have slight deviations due to rounding, which may have a nominal impact on value. 17. The appraised value opinion assumes all formulas used in the Excel grids throughout the report are accurate. 18. Unless noted, value assumes no apparent adverse site, building or zoning issues or conditions. 19. Site and building sizes are based on public record, data services, client and/or appraiser measurement at the time of appraisal and are considered reliable, but not guaranteed. Actual sizes herein could vary if made by an engineer/surveyor/contractor. 20. If any of the above if found to be different, value could change. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 69 CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1) The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2) The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions. 3) 1 have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4) 1 have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5) My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6) My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7) My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8) The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Appraisal Institute's Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, which includes the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice. 9) William R. Waytas has made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. Ethan Waytas did not inspect the subject property. Ethan Waytas wrote and selected all the data in the report. William R. Waytas read the report, concurred with the findings, and then co -signed the report. 10) No one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. 11) In accordance with the competency provision USPAP, I have verified that my knowledge, experience and education are sufficient to allow me to competently complete this appraisal. See attached qualifications. 12) As of the date of this report, Ethan Waytas and William R. Waytas have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the appraisal institute. 13) The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representative. 14) We have not provided services as an appraiser regarding the subject property within the 3-year period immediately preceding acceptance to this assignment. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: see report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: see report Page 70 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER I hereby certify: I have personally inspected the property herein appraised and that the owner has previously been afforded the opportunity to accompany me during an inspection. Such opportunity was afforded to the owner/representative and said individual did not accompany me on the inspection. That to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements contained in the appraisal herein above set forth are true and the information upon which the opinions expressed therein are based as correct; subject to the limiting conditions herein set forth. That I understand that such appraisal is to be used in connection with an acquisition, and that such appraisal has been made in conformity with the appropriate State laws, regulations, policies and procedures applicable to appraisal of such purposes and that to the best of my knowledge no portion of the value assigned to such property consists of items which are non-compensable under the established State law. That in making this appraisal I have disregarded any increase or decrease in the before value caused by the project for which the property is being acquired. That neither my employment nor the compensation for making this appraisal and report are in any way contingent upon the value reported herein. That I have no direct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition of such property appraised. That I will not reveal the findings and results of such appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of the acquiring agency until authorized by agency officials to do so, or until I am required to do so, by due process of law, or until I am released from this obligation by having publicly testified as to such findings. That the conclusion set forth in this appraisal was reached without collaboration or direction as to value. Ethan Waytas, MAI Certified General MN 40368613 Date: See Report William R. Waytas Certified General MN 4000813 Date: See Report Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 71 QUALIFICATIONS Appraisal Experience Presently and since 2006, Ethan Wavtas, MAI has been employed as an employee of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (10 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. He is currently a full time licensed certified general real estate appraiser, partner, and director of the company's IT department. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, cinema, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, lakeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO, subdivisions, and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Tax Appeal — variety of property types, including commercial, industrial, and multi -family. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Testimony -- Court, commission, arbitration, mediation, etc. testimony has been given Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #40368613 Holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute Education -- Graduate of the University of Minnesota: College of Science and Engineering, Twin Cities Campus Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, with distinction, 3.86 GPA. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Basic Appraisal Procedures -- Basic Appraisal Principles -- 2012-2013 15-Hour National Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice -- General Appraiser Sales Comparison Approach -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 1 -- General Appraiser Income Approach — Part 2 -- Advanced Income Capitalization -- General Appraiser Report Writing and Case Studies -- Real Estate Finance, Statistics and Valuation Modeling -- 2014-2015 7-hour National USPAP Update Course -- General Appraiser Site Valuation & Cost Approach -- Advanced Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use -- Advanced Concepts & Case Studies -- Quantitative Analysis Page 72 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Appraisal Experience Presently and since 1985, William R. Waytas has been employed as a full-time real estate appraiser. Currently a partner and President of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated, an independent appraisal firm (11 employees) who annually prepare 1,500 +/- appraisal reports of all types. Mr. Waytas was employed with Iver C. Johnson & Company, Ltd., Phoenix, AZ from 1985 to 1987. Properties appraised: • Commercial - low and high -density multi -family, retail, office, industrial, restaurant, church, strip - mall, fast-food, convenience stores, auto -service and repair, hotel, hotel water park, bed & breakfast, cinema, marina, numerous special use properties, and subdivision analysis. • Residential — single-family residences, hobby farms, lakeshore, condominiums, townhouses, REO and land. • Eminent Domain — extensive partial and total acquisition appraisal services provided to numerous governmental agencies and private owners. • Special Assessment — numerous street improvement and utilities projects for both governmental and private owners. • Review — residential, commercial and land development. • Clients - served include banks, savings and loan associations, trust companies, corporations, governmental bodies, relocation companies, attorneys, REO companies, accountants and private individuals. • Area of Service - most appraisal experience is in the greater Twin Cities Metro Area (typically an hour from downtown metro). Numerous assignments throughout Minnesota. Professional Membership, Associations & Affiliations License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser, MN License #4000813. Appraisal Institute: SRA, Senior Residential Appraiser Designation, General Associate Member Employee Relocation Council: CRP Certified Relocation Professional Designation. International Right -Of -Way Association: Member HUD/FHA: On Lender Selection Roster and Review Appraiser DNR: Approved appraiser for Department of Natural Resources Testimony -- Court, deposition, commission, arbitration & administrative testimony given. Mediator -- Court appointed in Wright County. Committees -- President of Metro/Minnesota Chapter, 2002, Appraisal Institute. -- Chairman of Residential Admissions, Metro/MN Chapter, Al. -- Chairman Residential Candidate Guidance, Metro/Minnesota Chapter, Al. -- Elm Creek Watershed Commission, Medina representative 3 years. -- Medina Park Commission, 3 years. Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 Page 73 Curriculum Vitae -- continued Education -- Graduate of Bemidji State University, Minnesota. B.S. degree in Bus. Ad. -- During college, summer employment in building trades (residential and commercial). -- Graduate of Cecil Lawter Real Estate School. Past Arizona Real Estate License. -- General & Professional Practice Courses & Seminars -- Course 101-Introduction to Appraising Real Property. -- Numerous Standards of Professional Practice Seminar. -- Fair Lending Seminar. -- Eminent Domain & Condemnation Appraising. -- Eminent Domain (An In -Depth Analysis) -- Property Tax Appeal -- Eminent Domain -- Business Practices and Ethics -- Scope of Work -- Construction Disturbances and Temporary Loss of Going Concern -- Uniform Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book Seminar) -- Partial Interest Valuation Divided (conservation easements, historic preservation easements, life estates, subsurface rights, access easements, air rights, water rights, transferable development rights) Commercial/Industrial/Subdivision Courses & Seminars -- Capitalization Theory & Techniques -- Highest & Best Use Seminar -- General & Residential State Certification Review Seminar -- Subdivision Analysis Seminar. -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (general) -- Advanced Income Capitalization Seminar -- Advanced Industrial Valuation -- Appraisal of Local Retail Properties -- Appraising Convenience Stores -- Analyzing Distressed Real Estate -- Evaluating Commercial Construction -- Fundamentals of Separating Real Property, Personal Property and Intangible Business Assets Residential Courses & Seminars -- Course 102-Applied Residential Appraising -- Narrative Report Writing Seminar (residential) -- HUD Training session local office for FHA appraisals -- Familiar with HUD Handbook 4150.1 REV-1 & other material from local FHA office. -- Appraiser/Underwriter FHA Training -- Residential Property Construction and Inspection -- Numerous other continuing education seminars for state licensing & Al Speaking Engagements -- Bankers -- Auditors -- Assessors -- Relocation (Panel Discussion) Publications -- Real Estate Appraisal Practice (book): Acknowledgement -- Articles for Finance & Commerce and Minnesota Real Estate Journal Page 74 Nagell Appraisal Incorporated 1952.544.8966 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 2Q. Consideration of approving a professional services agreement with WSB for a feasibility study for Mississippi River and Otter Creek Restoration in the amount of $25,500 Prepared by: Meeting Date: ® Consent Agenda Item Public Works Director/City Engineer 7/22/2024 ❑ Regular Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Parks, Arts & Recreation Director, City Administrator Finance Director, Community Development Director ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve a professional services agreement with WSB for the completion of a feasibility study for the Mississippi River and Otter Creek Streambank Restoration project. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City of Monticello and Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District (WCSWCD) have fielded many calls related to concerns with streambank erosion along the Mississippi River and Otter Creek. Areas of concern include private property, City -owned property, and right-of-way areas connecting to the Mississippi River. There are grant programs available to help fund streambank restoration projects through the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). However, WCSWCD noted that funding is most often awarded to cities who have developed a clear plan and prioritization for streambank projects. The completion of the proposed feasibility study would be used for future grant applications and bolster the City's competitiveness in the programs. Any grant funds received would then reduce the costs assessed to benefit property owners for improvements completed on private property. The proposed professional services agreement would provide a stormwater model, an evaluation of streambank restoration options, and a feasibility study. The study area runs along Otter Creek from the BNSF railroad tracks just south of CSAH 75 to the Mississippi River as well as along the Mississippi River within the current city limits. Because the Council appointed WSB as the City's Development Review & Environmental Review Consultant in 2024, the purchasing policy provides an exemption to the competitive bidding requirements. Therefore, staff asked WSB to prepare a proposal for these efforts and City staff City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 will assist in the field investigation efforts for this study. The anticipated completion date of the feasibility study is October 2024. I. Budget Impact: This project would be paid for from the stormwater utility fund. Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District has indicated that they may be willing to partner on the project up to an amount of $11,750. While this study was not specifically budgeted for in 2024, there is sufficient capacity within the repairs and maintenance allocation to cover the cost. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff will be involved in the field investigation and the review and approval of the study. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Monticello 2040 Plan includes a specific strategy statement in direct support of this project: "Strategy 4.1.3 - Prevent riverbank erosion by working with property owners and local watershed authorities to maintain and enhance the river's edge." STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend approval of a professional services agreement with WSB. The document will provide a resource for erosion management along the river and Otter Creek for residents and the City as well as increase the likelihood of securing grant funding assistance for future projects. SUPPORTING DATA A. WSB Proposal B. Project Area Map 7. 0 U U z W m U) 0 OD M z vi J 0 a a W z z 0 0 M W F- D T W D z W a a z W x 0 wsb July 10, 2024 Mr. Matt Leonard City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello MN 55362 Re: Scope of Services for City of Monticello Mississippi River and Otter Creek Restoration Feasibility Study Dear Mr. Leonard: Attached for your review and approval is our proposed scope of services, fee, and schedule for providing professional engineering services to complete a feasibility study for improvements along the Mississippi River and Otter Creek. This scope also includes identification of funding mechanisms for the potential improvements. Thank you for giving WSB the opportunity to present our proposal. If you are in agreement with this proposal, please sign where indicated below and return one copy to our office. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Rebecca Haug at (763) 438-7475 or rhaug@wsbeng.com. Sincerely, WSB f "' llcl Rebecca Haug Sr. Project Manager Attachments cc: Jim Stremel Earth Evans Director of Water Resources GA.Clients All\Monticello\Water Resources\Mississippi River and Otter Creek Streambank Restoration\Stream bank Restoration proposal 050324.docx Mr. Matt Leonard July 10, 2024 Page 2 If you are in agreement with the scope of services outlined above, please sign where indicated below and return one copy to our office. By signing you also agree that these services will be governed by the terms and conditions of the Professional Services Agreement entered into between WSB and the City of Monticello. ACCEPTED BY: City of Monticello, MN Name Title 7. Date 0 U 0 z W co V) z _U J 0 a Q W z z_ 0 0 co W F D V) W, W z W Q Q z W X 0 GA.Clients All\Monticello\Water Resources\Mississippi River and Otter Creek Streambank Restoration\Stream bank Restoration proposal 071024.docx Mr. Matt Leonard July 10, 2024 Page 3 SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND OTTER CREEK STREAMBANK RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN This work plan consists of a field visit, model updates, evaluation of streambank restoration options, preparation of Feasibility Study, and coordination with the City, Wright County SWCD, DNR and BWSR. The following are the tasks that will be included as part of this evaluation: SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Task 1: Field Walk - $1,500 7. ° WSB will coordinate with the City of Monticello to receive permission from all private properties 0 within the project limits of Otter Creek and the Mississippi River to assess the streambank Z m issues. During the field walk, WSB will collect notes, take photos and describe specifics of each erosion site including any nearby infrastructure and potential construction equipment access points. The limits of the study area are as shown on the attached exhibit. 0 0 CD Task 2: Existing Conditions Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model Updates - $10,000 Ln co The limits of the study area are as shown on the attached issues map provided by City and SWCD Staff. We will evaluate existing erosion issues along the Mississippi River identified at 6 locations. We have not included modeling of the Mississippi River with this task. We will LO identifv site specific erosion issues and mitieation options based on the field visit for the Mississippi River portion of the project area. Z 2 U) Additionally, we will model the segment of Otter Creek from the railroad tracks west of CSAH 75 J ° to the outfall at the Mississippi River. We will utilize Streamstats flow data and LiDAR to w develop a HECRAS 2D model for this segment. The 2D model is beneficial in that it can provide Z information on existing shear stress on the banks and high velocities which helps to inform 2 potential options to mitigate erosion. 0 No additional field survey has been included in this scope. If any additional survey is needed, we w will coordinate with the City before proceeding and complete this work at our standard hourly D V) rates. U) W Task 3: Map of Problem Areas - $2,500 D Z A map will be created of Otter Creek and the Mississippi River documenting the problem areas LU 'a found during the field walk and modeling completed with Task 2. The map will identify the a property owners interested in partnering with the City to complete streambank restoration Z w efforts. x 0 GA.Clients All\Monticello\Water Resources\Mississippi River and Otter Creek Streambank Restoration\Stream bank Restoration proposal 071024.docx 7. 0 U U Z w m U) 0 CD co Lo Lo Lo vi J 0 a w Z Z 0 0 co W D V) T W D Z W a a z w x 0 Mr. Matt Leonard July 10, 2024 Page 4 Task 4: Prepare Draft Report - $5,500 Based on the findings from the field walk, WSB will process and summarize the collected data and make preliminary estimates of erosion rates and site -specific costs, as well as recommended concept -level suitable method(s) for addressing erosion at each site. This information will include potential water quality benefits from the proposed improvements. This draft report will also include a summarized list of permits required for the projects. The draft will be presented to City staff and partners to review and provide comments. Task 5: Meet with City Staff and Partners - $1,000 WSB will attend one virtual meeting with City staff and partners including Wright County SWCD, DNR and BWSR to present the preliminary findings and gather comments and feedback on the draft report. Task 6: Prepare Final Report - $3,000 The Final report will incorporate the comments from City staff and the partners to finalize the document. Final design plans and specifications are not included in this proposal. If requested, we can prepare a separate scope for final design documents, survey, permits and construction support. Task 7: Preliminary Identification of Funding - $2,000 WSB will identify funding opportunities such as the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Clean Water Funds, DNR Conservation Partners Legacy Grant, MPCA community resiliency grants, along with others as they are identified. TOTAL ESTIMATED ENGINEERING FEE The cost to provide the scope of services outlined in the proposal will be billed hourly, based on our current hourly rates. We are proposing to complete the 2024 Mississippi River and Otter Creek Streambank Restoration Feasibility Study for an hourly fee not to exceed $25,500. TIME SCHEDULE A schedule will be developed during the project kick off meeting and may be adjusted based on grant funding opportunities. GA.Clients All\Monticello\Water Resources\Mississippi River and Otter Creek Streambank Restoration\Stream bank Restoration proposal 071024.docx I11TY OF Monticello Mississippi River and Otter Creek Streambank N Restoration Feasibility Study 0 600 City of Monticello Feet 1 inch = 600 feet wsb City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 3A. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2024-66 approving the vacation of drainage and utilitv easements as legally described for a portion of Deephaven 3. Prepared by: Meeting Date: ❑ Consent Agenda Item Community Development Director Reviewed by: Assistant City Engineer, City Clerk ACTION REQUESTED 7/22/2024 Approved by: City Administrator ® Public Hearing Item ❑ Regular Agenda Item Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-66 vacating drainage and utility easements as legally described for a portion of the plat of Deephaven 3. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Council is asked to vacate drainage and utility easements within the plat of Deephaven 3 to facilitate the combination of two lots into a single development parcel. The easement to be vacated is the 12' drainage and utility easement lying between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 of the plat. All other drainage and utility easements within the plat are to remain. The petitioners provided a legal description and exhibit for the portion of easement to be vacated. However, there is an inaccuracy in a portion of the submitted petition's legal description, which the petitioners have been asked to correct. The petitioners propose to combine Lots 3 and 4 of Deephaven 3 into a single lot through an administrative lot combination. The lot is proposed to be developed as a single building including a hotel, restaurant and quick -serve restaurant. The vacation removes the easement lying between the two lots. The lot combination and Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Permit are additional City Council considerations at the meeting on July 22, 2024. Deephaven Development LLC is the fee title owner of the parcels in which the current vacation is proposed, and they submitted a petition for the vacation of the noted easements to accommodate the proposed lot combination and development within the site. The City Engineer's office and Community Development Department reviewed the lot combination and development plans to verify all required public easements for drainage and utility purposes are and will remain in place. Procedurally, Council must call for a public hearing to consider the vacation. Statute requires fourteen days between the publication of notices and the public hearing itself. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 City staff prepared and published notices in the Monticello Times on July 4 and July 11, 2024, and notices were sent to affected property owners. I. Budget Impact: The petitioner or their representative provided the required vacation petition fee and escrow for consideration. II. Staff Workload Impact: Workload impact is expected at approximately 1-2 hours for review and recommendation on the vacation requests and platting. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The proposed development is subject to evaluation for consistency with the 2040 Plan with the pending land use decisions. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommend adopting the resolution vacating the portion of easement between the two parcels to be combined. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2024-66 B. Aerial Image C. Vacation Petition D. Vacation Legal Description E. Vacation Exhibit F. Plat of Deephaven 3 G. Proposed Site Utility Plan CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-66 RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR DEEPHAVEN 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 4152.851, after two (2) weeks published and posted notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before a hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the vacation of drainage and utility easements as described for Deephaven 3 was held on Monday, July 22, 2024, at 6:30 PM at the Monticello City Hall: Legal Descriptions: That part of the 12.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement being centered on the line common to Lot 3 and Lot 4, Block 1, DEEPHAVEN 3, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southerly of a line distant 12.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the north line of said Block 1, and lying northly of a line distant 12.00 feet northerly of and parallel with the south line of said Block 1. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MI NNESOTA: 1. The drainage and utility easements legally described above is hereby vacated contingent on: a. Recording of the administrative lot combination by Wright County 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give published, posted, and mailed notice of such hearing as required by law. ADOPTED BYthe City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 22nd day of July, 2024. ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk CITY OF MONTICELLO Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor Request for Vacation of a Portion of Drainage & Utility Easements for the Below Property PI D: 155-278-001030,155-278-001040 Lots 3 & 4, BIk 1 Deephaven 3 Created by: City of Monticello DocuSign Envelope ID: 6416F602-2F1B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C DATE: June 13, 2024 TO: City Clerk City of Monticello To Whom it may Concern: Deephaven Development LLC, fee title property owner of {property address), petition on behalf of Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC for the vacation of the 12' utility and drainage easement lying between the boundary of Lots 3 & 4, Block 1, of the Deephaven 3 Addition. Legal description: The drainage and utility easement across the East 6. 00feet of Lot 8, Block 3, Carlisle Village 4rh Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying north of the South 12.00 feet thereof and lying southwest of the southwesterly line of the Northeasterly 6.00 feet of Lot 7 of said Block 3 extended northwesterly. Thank You, DocuSigned by: bg6l[/� June 13, 2024 1 10:06 AM PDT r<.aE.�ay^✓.ter-i ✓ ... Property Owner's Signature DocuSign Envelope ID: 6416F602-2F1B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C T ran 'IWO, - 71 019 Beacon Wright County, MN Parcel ID 155278001030 Alternate ID n/a Sec/Twp/Rng 14-121-025 Class 233-3ACOMMERCIAL LAND AND BUILDING Property Address Acreage 2.21 Acres District (1101) CITY OF MONTICELLO-0882 Brief Tax Description SECT- 14 TWP-121 RANGE-025 DEEPHAVEN 3 LOT 3 BLOCK 1 (Note: Not to be used on legal documents) Date created: 6/13/2024 Last Data Uploaded: 6/13/2024 9:34:17 AM Developed by" Schneider GEOSPATIAL C10^ ;-- ^-^nerty line and utility and drainage ueen lots 3 and 4 Overview Legend Highways Interstate — State Hwy US Hwy — Roads Road Labels City/Township Limits ❑c ❑t Parcels Torrens Taxpayer Address n/a DocuSign E-velope ID: 6416F602-2F1B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C _..O v m JAW JIHYd SVWOHL ��¢ LJJ 'ON OVO8 A-LNnOD 0/4/J O� --------------------- ._�_._._ JNtg7 V A d! WN " yy L d O ----------' L � ----'---_----_ I W `u --- I U i , I I I I I I 1 I + , 1 I I I t 6a 3 I I f I I i i': I ' I 1 s•-w I-------------- wru Mmm.wx-------------- ---------------------------------' ------------------------------------- _ -- -- - ' • _ I 1 � I I 1 I I I i 9 E I I V) I I I I I I ebe I }I Yp � 7 W I MI m11bN � I - l n ' I I Ij i I . S: _______________________________________________ Fl___._ '------- iSE�[O�bS i / I � - gH101sJAe iwPQ— r. I .._.._ - -------------------------------- ______________ y 'yp i t___ r fit, 9 py _ 5 / 1 a, jf -------------- uirocc Mmcu.—w-------------- rl t I jl I 3 � DocuSign Envelope ID: 6416F602-2F1B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C CITY ��OF Monticello Applicant Name: Office Use Only Application Date: APPLICANT CHECK CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Vacation Petition (763)-295-2711 community.development(a,ei.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist Application Review Date: APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A completed City of Monticello Land Use Application form, including full legal description of property Completed checklist form (this document) with all required items from below Written petition for vacation, signed by the applicant and property l owner. Petition must include an accurate legal description of the area to be vacated. Current certificate of survey (within 6 months) for affected parcels, showing existing conditions and structures and existing and proposed lot lines. General grading and drainage information. Utilities (water, sewer, storm sewer, and service connections). All existing and proposed required easements. Minimum building setback lines, including accessory buildings. If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application or after approval of the vacation. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above Submit electronic sets via flash/jump drive or .ftp only Application fee and escrow per Land Use Application form CITY CHECK -IN Base Plan Set Requirements One (1) Reduced Plan set —11" x 17" Electronic copies of all Plan sets — submit electronic sets via flash/jump drive or .ftp only *If application is incomplete, full set of revised submittals are required for re -submittal of application. Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the Community Development Department. Revised 2023 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6416F602-2F1B-448E-96DE-87E85790346C Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 28 days prior to the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting, per the submission schedule maintained by the Community Development Department. Application submittals are due by 4 p.m. on the deadline date. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Applicants will be notified in writing when their application is considered complete. Applicants may be asked to supply additional information beyond required list above. A public hearing will be scheduled only when it has been verified that the application is complete. A complete application will be scheduled for an Application Review meeting between staff and the applicant, which typically occurs one week prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Review Process • After a petition for vacation is received, the petition shall be placed on the next Council agenda for consideration to call for a public hearing on the petitioned vacation. • If Council calls for the hearing, required notices shall be published and the hearing shall be held no less than two weeks following publication. • Before any vacation is considered, the City Council shall hold at least one public hearing after proper notice has been issued. • Following the hearing and subsequent discussion on the merits of the proposal, the Council shall adopt findings and recommendations related to the subject vacation. • Denial of vacation shall be supported by findings of fact as to why the request was denied. • If the request is approved, a resolution supporting the vacation shall be recorded at the Office of the Wright County Recorder. Revised 2023 MAIM- mo,!= DEEPHAVEN 3 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and that Valley View Townhomes, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, as tenants in common and fee owners of the following described property situated in the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota to wit: Outlot A, DEEPHAVEN 2, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as DEEPHAVEN 3 and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, ha caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this Z11h day of Naffmofy . 20 Z Signed: Deephaven Development, LLC Mark Buchhoresident STATE OF N i I n 901 K01-0 COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this ? thday of Vf M)7(Y , 20 by Mark Buchholz, President of Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, CO S My commission expires t 7 IZC, erfifYu p (Notary Printed Name) County, my 1 yl lw y q-va In witness whereof said Valley View Townhomes, LLP, a Minnesota limited liabil' partnershi , has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 1/ , 20 Signed: Valley View Townhomes LLP Dale Buchholz, Managing Partner STATE OF WYM DAPIA COUNTY OF C OIL This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1Nq1 1 Ttt" 20 by Dale Buchholz, Managing Partner of Valley View Townhomes, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, on behalf of the partnership. Jftt-svv-- � (Notary Signature) Notary Public, My commission expires 1-1 8 K-LD m-ra—wriv (Notary Printed Name) SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I Samuel J. DeLeo do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this D�- Od day of I`tot/i?rj%01r• , 20 %` - Samuel J. DeLeo, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 40341 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS The foregoing Surveyor's Certification was acknowledged before me this :�-BPa day of Vi eV As- i s,- , 20 � by Samuel J. DeLeo, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License Number 40341. Sidney Theis . Notary Public Stearns County, Minnesota My commission expires January 31, 2027 CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Be it known that at a meeting held on this 4414 A day of %jAV1M 20 , the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, did hereby 6view and approve this- tat of DEEPHAVEN 3. t � By: Chairperson fix: I Secretary CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of DEEPHAVEN 3 was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day 16 O'C F C'V a0'0"0 of -1 20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Mayor City Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021 Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this J day of February 20 9. Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY LAND RECORDS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20_ -�3 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sectionuu272.12 there are no delinq nt taxes and transfer entered this tl($ day of 20 . ?A11 aluki" I %-I tp-A V right Coun Land Records Administrator WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this day of � , 2023, atjD o'clock P . M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. I , Sleeve R5a3 , as Document No. tv'7, Wright- C my Recorder KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING BRAINERD ST. CLOUD Sheet No. 1 of 2 Sheets C+� t U a.-k Plat DEEPHAVEN 3 / A/ 4 .' �•, . •• ` ` / T • i.r• I Not Tangent °�'`� X `�--——— — — —- / . , to , No Scale r wo w / ♦ r r ♦ I •»::..... :.�. r / / / .\ « r 3 "p \ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •• '� U.1 ry \ ' .: 1 — — —North Quarter comer of Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 i (Cast Iron Monument) t 1 �,:,r :,r : : : S,r : •S .5 ' L"v'i' i 18 ° 19' 38" : < •��• �; ,q� , R= 698.00 Cg: L= 223.27 Z - - - �`' CH- 222.32°02' 47' W S 88 ° 47' 24" W 643.05 ` ` :.„ ; ~: ~ / // ' S• J>►.':N'° =16F -1,l--13900 — — -------_.�—_ �— `'——N—o—— — — — — — — — — — I I — — — — — — — 1 t9I 50268 "3`00. Drainage &Utility Easement 41.00 •I n 1.000W 1 -- *_ -- - ��o _ frt�x;.•.;. •'''•' .,:::w «'• wv, too Z THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS TO a •. :;..• / �'�,, ( I o • ' z BE DEDICATED AS PART OF THIS PLAT ARE SHOWN AS THUS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: a•» •�,, ^)/ I I REAR LOT LINE �•t, • ^r/ 2 I I N 1 d I 4 ' ` N \•••• LLI S�--F I Cd ..;. ...z r f' I g I N�,° UNE I I ::.: «. . ,r; j / I I$ 1 1 BLOCK 1 I I o. -1 IZ ROAD 141 toti/'` \ S,4j� �•�,. �•'�=.�,. �3`'a ' i .. I I f0orn�m�tEasement DNENSIONSARE IN FEET •00 163,7�........ or dy age aid utility purposes • per Doc. No. 697451CB"1CH= 1E64362. Not 100 LM'I' y / 1'`•. `— I,' �It — — —— 275.81 Tangent ---Z ----_ _ -----� —420.47 I » : a. _ .,i I I N 88° 40' 21" E 831.87 :• / hg - - Not Tangen �� T { --' ; ; (� M I - - - - North -South Quarter Section Line /Per a�F$r -- `------------------------------•----i---..__ f-• I I 3 I �.- 1 Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 s / NO143�F� �- -- I - �$ �'�'` -See Detail A o I M I Ln r / Z I I I O/ � • I p CL 1100 1 E 1 I -- - - - - - - - - ---------- ,/ / ,,� I In LA 3 1 / / 1 I 1• -- . . M N • ' qR in �C3 / / �, / , z J. •------ - - - - -- r N 89 coo, 49 E 266 CIO 33 r N I 1 „ti r eV I I I ..l„ 1 .•••. � Q Z I I I - - - - -I ',49.07--.° '--------------------------r-------1--------------------- _ ...� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I ?, �;r I _ ---- N 89°00' 49" E 1003.40 1^ I 1 Z: N 89.00' 47" E (CEDAR STREET ADDITION) I r • •. I .r r •� ' I NOPT PLa I -I ? '•� t ' '\'•• 1 Vicinity Map NM'I' 01 A I'IEI� •••• :»•: •• •: »• .: i :«• :« : �'.:.r :.r :. • :.r : 't I M ., % I R I I I \o ',•t• a 01 "'o K---.LD KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING BRAINERD 3T. CLOUD ' MU'!1 Of I' A 1 cn I c I I 66 I - - - - LEGEND OF PROPERTY BOUNDARY SYMBOLS I �Z O IRON PIPE WITH CAP STAMPED 'DELEO 40341" TO BESET I • FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 60 120 South Quarter corner of 10 Q GOVERNMENT SECTION CORNER MONUMENT Note: The underlying property defined by this plat of DEEPHAVEN 2 is subject to a blanket temporary easement for public pathway or trail purposes per document number 1432430. THE NORTH -SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SEC. 14, TWP. 121, RNG. 25 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 00*00' 32" WEST SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 60 FEET Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25 i (Cast Iron Monument) - - ; • �Project I Location SEC 14, Tl 121, RNG 25 a W Z 0 J a NO SCALE Sheet No. 2 of 2 Sheets Legal Description for Easement Vacation That part of the 12.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement being centered on the line common to Lot 3 and Lot 4, Block 1, DEEPHAVEN 3, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southerly of a line distant 12.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the north line of said Block 1, and lying northly of a line distant 12.00 feet northerly of and parallel with the south line of said Block 1. // N ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED 0 20 40 .—.—. I SCALE IN FEET CHELSEA ROAD rq r l yt: o..w.. 3 EASEMENT VACATION AREA Line common t Lot 3 and Lot z South line of Block 1 ------------- -- r-4 i....... i''•. cV T North line of Block 1 €,.'wit ? 4, --——— — — — — —— N EXHIBIT DRAWING EASEMENT VACATION �D City of Monticello County of Wright, State of Minnesota Located in Section 14, Township 121 North, Range 25 West Date: June 21, 2024 KRAMER LEAS DELEO (KLD Proj. No. CICON2402) BRA I NERD ST. CLOUD I EXISTING 0I ° • ° ^ ° ° e ` ° ° ° ° ° ° °°. o e EXISTING HYDRANT HYDRANT S CLEANOUT W/ RISER (SSCO2)-- v > -- - - > RIM = 963.90 r+r >> TOP INV OF RISER = 954.19 < --- r BOTTOM INV OF RISER = 947.15 ` - - FtA -J- FM " EXISTING / __=_ •- FM / - FI r / HYDRANT FM / CONNECT TO EXISTING ° : ° ° ' - tit' _------- FM / I O I I is DIP WATER STUB FM ow --- ------i- - - 131.00 - a I ------ - /-- ``i I I- J� -- ---------------- ----- --- -- �\ ----- i -----/ raina e 8 Wit Eas men - COIJNEC TO E CISTIN \ - �-� \ --- -+�- I I o / d 8" PI/C SAN. SEVER S 'UBEA - I o l o INV 947.15 \6\° l I lo o �a=-�5 FIELD VEFdFY) �� I 8" 45° BEND III ��/ _ - INV= 951.25 _ Q $„ DIP \ LEI ---- G °� I I �14 CI III I I I I I I DPI l I I CLEANOUT c!_11� 962 (2) 8" I45 I ° °° ° ° • I - = -RIM = 963.9� BENDS I \ ` \ 963.31 N 88 ° 47' 24" E 139.00 INV = 955.55 959.38 I I %o / I I I ,9 1996 \ �. SOT Z9 ��� I 1 � 6- t ��, - - - - < �° �� I I I I ) I �I I 8" 450 BEND CD II /` " ) o ! ! ° i _F I I I 1 8" DIP COMBINED WATER l I I I SERVICE W/ 8" GATE 8" PVC SAN. SERVICE / I \ I INV @ BLDG = 956.35 i I i VALVE &BOX I ' PROPOSED BUILDING I I I PROPOSED BUILDING I \ l FFE - 964.85 I I FFE = 964.85 w41 I I I I 966 I - - J I I I b I Iro on cy, .a -ADJUST EXISTING MANH LE o I I I I I NEW RIM = 964.50 BRIM= 964.24 I _ � , I I RIM= 964.01 \ RIM= 965.59 /���j�j��� I I � INV E W= V950.1 � - I ip / I - = I � I - . �4 2�1 I NV 953.99 INV E/W 951.69 � I I RIM 96 INV= 958.14 I = 45L.b� �1 11 - INV f`52.b9 c I I I I 6- iNv INV= 949 2 l - ----C-loo ------------ ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE IT)I��\II{\ l I I I J - - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - + -- -- - ---- NEW RIM=967.00 S I I . F - \\ I - I - -�� �-fi�� - -- -- -- -- - -- I - -- -- ----- -� I ---- I _ _ - �_ _ -- ---- -- * i • - _ - - _ - - -- - --- -_r ----------------- _ - I ------ ---- _ � I I --� }----------- - -----------.------------------------- !� ressFasement I I I 0368I 5 I *_J/�' I ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE NEW RIM = 964.75 EXISTING L _ ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE I ( EXISTING 111 HYDRANT ��� NEW RIM = 963.70 l HYDRANT T NOTE: EXISTING ST I RIM= 964,'0 RIM= 3.97 I ) ITRANSFORMER TO INV-- 9 I INV= 955. 7 " RELOCATED. RIM= 964.43 I 88 .26 . I INV= 959.98 INV= 958.00 v RIM= 964.88 � �i _F_INV= 961.73 l UTILITY NOTES: 1. WATER MAIN AND ANY WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 2. IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED WHERE WATER MAIN OR SERVICES CROSS EXISTING OR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, SERVICE LINES, OR STORM SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RAISED OR LOWERED APPROPRIATELY WHILE STILL MAINTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 3. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM SEWER CROSSES SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, OR ASSOCIATED SERVICES. INSULATION SHALL CONSIST OF AN 8-FT X 8-FT SQUARE OF 3"-THICK RIGID INSULATION. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE STORM SEWER AND PIPE CROSSING WITH THE EDGES OF THE INSULATION PARALLEL TO THE PIPING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. 4. INSTALL TRACER WIRE ALONG PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPE AS PER MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. https://www.mrwa.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/TracerW ireSpecGuideFi nalwebll.pdf 5. SEE SHEET C5 FOR STORM SEWER ELEVATIONS AND SLOPE, AND SHEET C2 & C3 FOR STANDARD DETAILS RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR STATE PLUMBING REVIEW, AND OBTAIN AN APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT FROM MNDLI, PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AFTER THE APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND ANY AND ALL PERTINENT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS AND IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO ORDER UTILITY MATERIALS AFTER APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW REPORT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM MNDLI It N O N C7 O O w W W J SCHULTZ ENGINEERING CID & SITE DESIGN U 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 230 J SARTELL, MINNESOTA 56377 5; PH: (320) 339-0669 (� FX: (866) 633-1830 schultzeng@live.com www.schultzengdesign.com Z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, O SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS U PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM A DULY Cr LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS F- OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 Ir 0 O BRIAN J. SCHULTZ, PE Z LICENSE NO.: 43129 DATE: xx/xx/2024 QREVISIONS Z NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J 1 xx/xx/2024 W 2 xx/xx/2024 3 xx/xx/2024 4 xx/xx/2024 SCHULTZ ENG. PROJECT NO.: 24024 ISSUE DATE: xx/xx/2024 DRAWN BY: NES REVIEWED BY: BJS © SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, PLLC 2024 CIVIL SHEET INDEX Cl -STANDARD NOTES & SPECS. C2 - STANDARD DETAILS C3 - STANDARD DETAILS C4 - STANDARD DETAILS C5 - GRADING PLAN C6 - SWPPP - STANDARD NOTES C7 - SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C8 - SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C9 - UTILITY PLAN C10 - PAVING PLAN FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES DEEPHAVEN, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO, MN UTILITY PLAN SCALE: 1 "=30' 1 I 1 0 30 60 C9 City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 3B. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of Tax Abatement Agreement with Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC in support of a 98-room Fairfield By Marriott Hotel and associated restaurants development proposal Prepared by: Meeting Date: ❑ Regular Agenda Item Economic Development Manager 7/22/2024 ® Public Hearing Item ❑ Consent Agenda Item Reviewed by: Approved by: Community Development Director, City Administrator Finance Director ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-65 authorizing a 10-year tax abatement in support of a 98- Room Fairfield By Marriott Hotel with attached restaurants. ASSOCIATED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) ACTION March 27, 2024: The EDA reviewed the 98-room Fairfield By Mariott Hotel Development Tax Abatement Pre -Application submittal by Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC. After discussion with the developer, the EDA voted to recommend the developer submit a formal Tax Abatement Application. April 10, 2024: The EDA reviewed the Tax Abatement Application and supporting materials for the proposed 98-room Fairfield By Marriott Hotel and attached restaurants and authorized a resolution of support recommending the City Council consider authorizing a 10-year Tax Abatement Agreement with Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC is proposing to construct a 98-room Fairfield by Marriott Hotel with two attached restaurants. The developer is seeking to fill a financing gap through the use of Tax Abatement, which will support its effort to secure lender financing for the project. The estimated cost of the development is approximately $19,500,000 (this is a slight increase from information provided to the EDA on April 10, 2024, which indicated a total investment of $18,450,000). City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC has selected a 3.60-acre site on the south side of Chelsea Road across the street from the Best Western Plus Chelsea Hotel. The site is in The Pointes at Cedar District (PCD) development and zoning district. The hotel development proposal includes two restaurants. A 6,200 sq. ft., 130-seat restaurant is attached to the hotel through a connecting corridor and a quick -serve casual restaurant is incorporated into the development as an endcap on the building, adjacent to the sit-down restaurant. The proposed uses are in alignment with the PCD zoning. The development proposal is expected to create approximately 42 new jobs. Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC is requesting a 10-year Tax Abatement from the City. In addition, the developer is also asking Wright County to consider a similar Tax Abatement assistance request. That is to be considered by the County Board in August 2024. As noted in the City Tax Abatement Policy adopted in October 2023, the Public Purpose of Abatement is to: • Encourage desirable development or redevelopment within the city that would not occur but for the Abatement • Leverage Abatement and other public dollars to maximize private sector investment in the city For the hotel development proposal, the applicable "Policy' goals for Abatement consist of: • Retaining or creating living wage jobs • Enhancing or diversifying the economy based on demonstrated need (2023 EDA Hotel indicated a need for a new hotel with 80 to 100 rooms) • Encouraging high quality commercial or industrial development through private investment • Improving the quality of life of city residents by providing a desirable good or service Northland Securities, financial advisory for the City and EDA, completed an analysis of the Tax Abatement assistance request and provided a summary overview memorandum with findings and a recommendation. As noted in the Northland memo, the public purpose of the Tax Abatement assistance is to increase or preserve the tax base and support economic development activity in the city. In addition to the increase in tax base and economic development activity, generally the proposed development fulfills a demonstrated need in the community. The 2023 Hotel Market Study commissioned by the EDA in the summer of 2023 indicated that potential hotel business was not being captured by the existing mix of hotels in the city. In particular, it stated that business travelers were not staying at the existing Monticello hotels and instead chose to stay at higher level hotels in Albertville or Maple Grove. To address this, the study recommended City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 that the City/EDA should strive to attract an upper midscale quality hotel with 80 +/- rooms. It further stated that a new hotel proposal may likely need some form of financial assistance to be viable (Exhibit D). The proposed Fairfield By Marriott Hotel and restaurant development may help to mitigate that market deficiency. Staff reviewed the proposal using the evaluation metrics created for financial assistance requests and indicated that the development tallies a score of 35, similar to the UMC and Wiha Tool expansion development scores. Key factors in the score relate to the tax base increase per acre, number of new jobs per acre, low level of public sector funding per job and leveraging of private sector investment (25:1). The community benefit to address a market deficiency also boosted the score. In addition to meeting general community goals for the use of tax abatement noted above, this project supports the specific intent of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan, which is an important consideration for this abatement request. The proposed hotel and restaurant are highly desirable uses within the project area and the site development plans meet the following Pointes at Cedar Goals: • At the nearly 100-acre The Pointes at Cedar, a wide range of uses are supported and encouraged. Mixed use is most likely to be seen in the horizontal layout of interrelated uses, rather than vertical mixed -use buildings, although such buildings would be welcomed. In concept, The Pointes area anticipates commercial land uses to the west and north, transitioning to a mix of residential living environments to the east and south. • To support the mixed -use neighborhood, desired commercial uses are those that promote high levels of employment and consist of or support hospitality and recreational uses. These include restaurants and entertainment venues. Due to the extensive exposure of the commercial buildings in The Pointes area, business building design and use will present a public face in all directions, with attention to architectural opportunities presented by the service portions of the buildings. • A unique transitional landscaping model reflecting Minnesota's biomes will guide the public and private spaces and their landscape design. Art, signage, architecture and other design elements are encouraged to reflect the biome construct. In terms of the financial evaluation of the request, the Northland Memo includes several exhibits showing the Projected Cash Flow from Tax Abatement, a Funding Sources and Uses for the development, and Preliminary Financial Proforma with investment returns during the requested 10-year period. The Northland analysis illustrates City and County abatement projections. As shown in the Proforma, it appears that the proposed project will likely struggle to achieve an acceptable industry standard rate of return without tax abatement from the City City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 and the County. As a result, without Tax Abatement assistance, there is a risk that the proposal may not secure desired lender financing. As noted previously, the developers indicated the total cost of the development proposal is approximately $19,500,000. The County Assessor is estimating that the finished project will have a taxable market value of $6,365,000; a 1% annual increase in value is projected through the proposed term of the Tax Abatement assistance. The Cash Flow Projections exhibit shows a potential City Tax Abatement totaling $378,515 over a 10-year period based on the projected taxable market value. Due to the slightly higher project investment and likely higher taxable valuation, the payment of tax abatement proceeds may occur in a time frame shorter than 10 years. Under Minnesota state statutes, cities and counties are the authorizing entities for Tax Abatement, not EDAs. As per the City's adopted policy, the role of Monticello's EDA is to review applications for Tax Abatement assistance and provide recommendations to the City Council for final consideration. A Tax Abatement Agreement has been prepared by the EDA attorney and is attached outlining terms noted below providing an abatement of $378,515 over a 10-year time frame. Kev Terms: • City Tax Abatement amount of $378,515 (not to exceed) over a maximum of 10 years (possibly a shorter timeframe) • Project Commencement date: not later than December 31, 2024 • Project Completion date: not later than December 31, 2025 • No Assignment or Transfer of project allowed without prior written consent of the City • Initial Abatement payment to occur on August 1, 2027; then February 1 and August 1 of each succeeding year thereafter • Business Subsidy job and wage goals: 42 new FTE jobs with average hourly wages of $22.30 • Required annual Business Subsidy compliance reporting requirements Representatives of Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC will be at the meeting to review the proposal and answer questions that the City Council may have regarding the development and request for Tax Abatement assistance. Budget Impact: The budget impact related to the Tax Abatement application submittal is minimal. The developer submitted the Final Application escrow deposit fee of $10,000. Those funds are being used to pay for legal fees and the financial analysis review which was completed by Northland Securities. It should be noted that the City Attorney requested the EDA attorney prepare the necessary legal documents for the Council's consideration. City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 If the City Council approves the abatement, the projected tax impact as shown in the Northland memo, averages approximately $37,000 per year (which is about 0.28% of the City's 2024 property tax levy) through the life of the abatement. As a reminder, the City must levy funds sufficient to reimburse the abatement amount. II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff involved in the review steps of the Hotel Tax Abatement application consist of the City Administrator, Community Development Director, Finance Director, and Economic Development Manager. External staff involved in the review include Northland Securities staff and legal counsel from Kennedy & Graven. III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: The Hotel development proposal's relationship to the Monticello 2040 Vison + Plan aligns with goals related to Business Attraction and Retention, and Tax Base Expansion. Additionally, proactive utilization of key development tools is noted as being critical in creating a strong, economically vibrant local economy. This includes steps or activities/projects that will address market deficiencies as identified in the 2023 Hotel Study. Further, the proposed development directly aligns with the vision and uses established for The Pointes at Cedar District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend approving the Tax Abatement Agreement with Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC for the 98-room Fairfield By Marriott Hotel development proposal. Staff's recommendation is based on the Northland Securities analysis, the findings of the EDA commissioned Hotel Market Study, alignment with specific Monticello 2040 and The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan, as well as consistency with the City's adopted Tax Abatement Policy goals. SUPPORTING DATA A. City Council Resolution No. 2024-65 B. Tax Abatement Agreement C. Tax Abatement Application — Fairfield By Marriott Hotel Development D. Developer (Good Neighbor) References and Development History E. Northland Securities Memo F. Aerial Photo - Proposed Development Site G. City Tax Abatement Policy H. Economic Development Assistance -Abatement Evaluation Criteria I. 2023 Hospitality Study J. Hotel Finance Interest K. Site Plan L. Floor Plans M. Exterior Renderings N. Economic Development Goals City Council Agenda: 7/22/2024 O. Excerpts, The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan P. Executed Contribution Agreement Q. Public Hearing Notice CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2024-65 RESOLUTION GRANTING A PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE CITY AND APPROVING A TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MONTICELLO HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "City Council") of City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended (the "Abatement Act"), the City has developed a tax abatement policy (the "Policy") pursuant to which the City shall provide tax abatement assistance to projects within the City that meet certain requirements. The Policy specifies that tax abatement assistance will be provided to projects from the City's share of property taxes on a property collected from the increased tax base generated by said project; Property taxes collected from the base value of the land or any current structures on the property will not be abated as part of any assistance granted. The Policy allows the City Council to deviate from the Policy for projects that exceed the objectives identified therein. 1.02. The City has reviewed a proposal to acquire, construct and equip an approximately 98-room hotel development with a 130-seat restaurant, an indoor pool, meeting space and related parking and amenities (the "Project") to be owned by Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, or an entity affiliated with or related thereto (the "Developer"), to be located on certain property on Chelsea Road in the City legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"). 1.03. The City believes the Project will preserve and enhance the property tax base in the City and the State of Minnesota (the "State"), help create jobs in the City and the State and provide access to services for residents of the City. 1.04. The Developer has requested a property tax abatement on the Property in order to assist in financing a portion of the costs of the Project. The proposed term of the abatement will be up to 10 years in an amount not to exceed $378,515. In a deviation from the Policy, the proposed abatement will apply to the City's entire share of real estate taxes for the Property (the "Abatement"). 1.05. The City and the Developer have caused to be prepared a Tax Abatement Agreement (the "Agreement") setting forth the terms and conditions under which the City will provide tax abatement assistance for the Project, including compliance with job and wage goals as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995, as amended (the "Business Subsidy Act"). 1.06. On the date hereof, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Abatement, at which the views of all interested persons were heard and considered. Section 2. Findings. 2.01. The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this resolution. 2.02. It is hereby found and determined that the benefits to the City from the Abatement will be at least equal to the costs to the City of the Abatement, because (a) based on representations of the Developer, the City believes that the development to be facilitated is not reasonably likely to occur absent the Abatement and (b) the long-term taxes collected from the Property after termination of the Abatement will exceed the amount of the Abatement provided to the Developer. 2.03. It is hereby found and determined that the Abatement is in the public interest because it is expected to result in the following public benefits: (a) The Abatement will increase the City's tax base through the creation of an estimated $10,200,000 increase in market value for the Property; and (b) It will provide additional employment opportunities in the City and the State; and (c) It supports fulfillment of a demonstrated economic development need within the community; and (d) It supports development consistent with the Goals of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan; and (e) It will provide access to services for residents of the City. Section 3. Actions Ratified; Abatement Approved. 3.01. The City Council hereby ratifies all actions of the City's staff and consultants in arranging for approval of this resolution in accordance with the Abatement Act. 3.02. Subject to the provisions of the Abatement Act and the execution of the Agreement as set forth in Section 4 hereof, the Abatement is hereby approved and adopted subject to the following terms and conditions: MC295\1\895647.v2 2 (a) The term "Abatement" means the City's share of annual real property taxes received by the City with respect to the Property in an amount calculated in each tax -payable year as follows: the City's tax rate for such tax -payable year multiplied by the net tax capacity of the Property as set forth in the Agreement. The City Council approves this deviation from the Policy. (b) The City will pay the Abatement in the amount, at the time, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement. (c) In accordance with Section 469.1813, subdivision 8 of the Abatement Act, in no year shall the Abatement, together with all other abatements approved by the City under the Abatement Act and paid in that year exceed the greater of 10% of the net tax capacity of the City for that year or $200,000 (the "Abatement Cap"). The City may grant other abatements permitted under the Abatement Act after the date of this resolution, provided that to the extent the total abatements in any year exceed the Abatement Cap, the allocation of Abatement Cap to such other abatements is subordinate to the Abatement granted pursuant to this resolution. (d) In no event shall the total payments of the Abatement to the Developer exceed $378,515 or continue to be paid for more than 10 years as set forth in the Agreement. (e) The Abatement is subject to modification in accordance with the Abatement Act, subject to the terms of the Agreement. (f) In accordance with Section 469.1815 of the Abatement Act, in each year during the term of the Abatement, the City will add to its levy the total estimated amount of current year Abatement granted under this resolution. (g) The City makes no warranties or representations regarding the amount or availability of the Abatement. Section 4. Agreement Approved. 4.01. The City believes that the development of the Project pursuant to the Agreement, and fulfillment generally of the Agreement, are in the vital and best interests of the City and the health, safety, morals, and welfare of its residents. Those public purposes of the Agreement include providing employment opportunities in the City and the State, preserving and enhancing the tax base in the City and the State, providing access to services for City residents, and encouraging additional desired development in the City. 4.02. The City hereby approves the Agreement, including the business subsidy agreement set forth therewith, substantially in accordance with the terms set forth in the form presented to the City Council, together with any related documents necessary in connection MC295\1\895647.v2 3 therewith, and without limitation all documents, exhibits, certifications or consents referenced in or attached to the Agreement (collectively, the "Development Documents") and hereby authorizes the Chair of the City Council and the City Administrator to negotiate the final terms thereof and, in their discretion and at such time as they may deem appropriate, to execute the Development Documents on behalf of the City, and to carry out, on behalf of the City, the City's obligations thereunder when all conditions precedent thereto have been satisfied. 4.03. The approval hereby given to the Development Documents includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and by the officers authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and said officers are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such document in accordance with the terms hereof. This Resolution shall not constitute an offer and the Development Documents shall not be effective until the date of execution thereof as provided herein. In the event of absence or disability of the officers, any of the documents authorized by this Resolution to be executed may be executed without further act or authorization of the City Council by any duly designated acting official, or by such other officer or officers of the City Council as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf. 4.04. Upon execution and delivery of the Development Documents, the officers and employees of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take or cause to be taken such actions as may be necessary on behalf of the City to implement the Development Documents. Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution is effective upon execution in full of the Agreement. Approved by the City Council of City of Monticello, Minnesota this 22nd day of July, 2024. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk MC295\1\895647.v2 4 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION [INSERT] MC295\1\895647.v2 TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT ' 110 10 .01 yj WiTANNO CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA AND MONTICELLO HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC This document drafted by: KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (GAF) 150 S 5' Street, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 ARTICLE I Section 1.1 ARTICLE 11 Section 2.1 Section 2.2 ARTICLE III Section 3.1 Section 3.2 Section 3.3 Section 3.4 Section 3.5 Section 3.6 Section 3.7 Section 3.8 Section 3.9 Section 3.1 Section 3.1 ARTICLE IV Section 4.1 Section 4.2 Section 4.3 Section 4.4 Section 4.5 Section 4.6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................ I 0 1 Definitions......................................................................................................1 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES...........................................................4 Representations and Warranties of the City...................................................4 Representations and Warranties of the Developer.........................................4 UNDERTAKINGS BY DEVELOPER AND CITY...................................................6 Construction of Project and Reimbursement of Project Cost.........................6 Limitations on Undertaking of the City.........................................................6 Commencement and Completion of Construction.........................................6 Damage and Destruction................................................................................ 6 Change in Use of Project................................................................................7 Prohibition Against Transfer of Project and Assignment of Agreement...................................................................................................... 7 Real Property Taxes.......................................................................................7 TaxAbatement Program................................................................................8 BusinessSubsidy Act.....................................................................................9 Administrative Costs....................................................................................10 Records.........................................................................................................II EVENTS OF DEFAULT..........................................................................................12 Events of Default Defined............................................................................12 Remedieson Default....................................................................................13 NoRemedy Exclusive..................................................................................13 NoImplied Waiver.......................................................................................13 Agreement to Pay Attorney's Fees and Expenses........................................13 Release and Indemnification Covenants......................................................13 ARTICLE V ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS..................................................................................15 Section 5.1 Insurance......................................................................................................15 Section 5.2 Conflicts of Interest......................................................................................16 Section 5.3 Titles of Articles and Sections......................................................................17 Section 5.4 Notices and Demands...................................................................................17 Section 5.5 Counterparts.................................................................................................17 Section 5.6 Law Governing.............................................................................................17 Section5.7 Duration........................................................................................................17 Section 5.8 Provisions Surviving Rescission or Expiration............................................17 Section 5.9 Superseding Effect.......................................................................................17 Section5.10 Recording.....................................................................................................18 Section 5.11 Relationship of Parties.................................................................................18 Section 5.12 Interpretation; Concurrence..........................................................................18 Section 5.13 Data Practices...............................................................................................18 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TAX ABATEMENT PROPERTY.............................A-1 -1- MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT THIS TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), made as of the _ day of July, 2024, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA (the "City"), a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, and MONTICELLO HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer has requested tax abatement assistance from the City in connection with acquisition, construction and equipping of a certain Project (as hereinafter defined) located within the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended, the City has established a Tax Abatement Program (as hereinafter defined) after a duly noticed public hearing held on July 22, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City believes that providing financial assistance for the Project, and the fulfillment of this Agreement are vital and are in the best interests of the City, will result in an increase of the tax base of the City, help create employment opportunities in the City and the State, help provide access to services for residents, and are in accordance with the public purpose and provisions of the applicable state and local laws and requirements under which the Project has been undertaken and is being assisted; and WHEREAS, certain requirements of the Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995, as amended (the "Business Subsidy Act"), apply to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted criteria for awarding business subsidies that comply with the Business Subsidy Act; and WHEREAS, in connection with the assistance provided under this Agreement, this agreement constitutes a subsidy agreement under the Business Subsidy Act. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1 Definitions. All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the following meanings unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context: Administrative Costs shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.10; Affiliate means a corporation, partnership, association, limited liability company or similar entity organized under the laws of the United States of America or a state thereof which is directly controlled by or under common control with the Developer. For purposes of this definition, control means the power to direct management and policies through the ownership of at least a majority of its voting securities, or the right to designate or elect at least a majority of the members of its governing body by contract or otherwise; Agreement means this Tax Abatement Agreement, as the same may be from time to time modified, amended or supplemented, as provided by the terms of this Agreement; Benefit Date means the date which is the earlier of (i) the date the City issues a certificate of occupancy for the Project, or (ii) the date the Developer fully occupies the Project; Business Day means any day except a Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday, a day on which the City is closed for business, or a day on which banking institutions in the City are authorized by law or executive order to close; Business Subsidy Act means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995, as amended; City means the City of Monticello, Minnesota; Developer means Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, its successors and assigns; Event of Default means any of the events described in Section 4.1; Net Tax Ca_pacit_v has the meaning provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.13, Subdivision 21b, as amended; Project means the acquisition, construction and equipping of an approximately 98-room hotel development with a 130-seat restaurant, a quick -serve restaurant, an indoor pool, meeting space and related parking and amenities on the Tax Abatement Property to be owned and operated by the Developer; Reimbursement Amount has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(2) hereof; State means the State of Minnesota; 2 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 Tax Abatement Act means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended; Tax Abatement Program means the actions by the City pursuant to the Tax Abatement Act and undertaken in support of the Project including without limitation this Agreement and the resolution of the City authorizing the Tax Abatements and the findings of fact set forth therein; Tax Abatement Pronertv means the real property in the City located on certain property on Chelsea Road in the City legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto; Tax Abatements means the City's share of annual real estate property taxes received by the City with respect to the Tax Abatement Property in each tax -payable year and calculated as follows: the City's total tax rate for that year multiplied by the Net Tax Capacity of the Tax Abatement Property in accordance with this Agreement. Termination Date means the earliest of (i) August 1, 2037; (ii) any earlier date this Agreement is cancelled in accordance with the terms hereof, or (iii) the date the Reimbursement Amount is paid or deemed paid in full in accordance with the terms hereof, Unavoidable Delays means delays, outside the control of the party claiming its occurrence, which are the direct result of strikes, other labor troubles, unusually severe or prolonged bad weather, acts of God, fire or other casualty to the Project, litigation commenced by third parties which, by injunction or other similar judicial action or by the exercise of reasonable discretion, directly results in delays, or acts of any federal, state or local governmental unit (other than the City, with respect to its respective obligations only) which directly result in delays. Unavoidable Delays shall not include delays in the Developer's obtaining of permits or governmental approvals necessary to enable construction of the Project by the dates such approvals and construction is required by this Agreement. MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 ARTICLE II REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Section 2.1 Renresentations and Warranties of the Citv. The City makes the following representations and warranties: (1) The City is a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State and has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. (2) The Tax Abatement Program was created, adopted and approved in accordance with the terms of the Tax Abatement Act. (3) The City proposes, subject to the further provisions of this Agreement, to provide certain financial assistance to the Developer in connection with the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project (the "Project Costs") as further provided in this Agreement. (4) The City makes no representation or warranty, either express or implied, as to the Tax Abatement Property or its condition, or that the Tax Abatement Property shall be suitable for the Developer's purposes or needs. Section 2.2 Renresentations and Warranties of the Developer. The Developer makes the following representations and warranties: (1) The Developer has the power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder and is not in violation of its articles of organization, operating agreement or any local, state or federal laws. (2) The Developer is a limited liability company validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State and has full power to enter into this Agreement and carry out the covenants contained herein. (3) The Developer will construct the Project or cause the Project to be constructed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and all local, state and federal laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, environmental laws and regulations, zoning laws and regulations, including City Code § 153.048 related to zoning and design standards in the Pointes at Cedar District, where the Project is located, energy conservation laws and regulations, building code laws and regulations and public health laws and regulations. (4) Before the Project may be constructed, the Developer will obtain or cause to be obtained, in a timely manner, all required permits, licenses and approvals, and will meet, in a timely manner, all requirements of all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. (5) The Project would not be undertaken by or on behalf of the Developer, and in the opinion of the Developer would not be economically feasible within the reasonably foreseeable future, without the assistance and benefit to the Developer provided for in this Agreement. 4 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 (6) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement is prevented, limited by or conflicts with or results in a breach of, the terms, conditions or provisions of any contractual restriction, evidence of indebtedness, agreement or instrument of whatever nature to which the Developer is now a party or by which it is bound, or constitutes a default under any of the foregoing. (7) To the knowledge of the undersigned, no Councilmember or officer of the City, will benefit financially from this Agreement within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.311 and 471.87. (8) The Developer will cooperate fully with the City with respect to any litigation commenced with respect to the Project but only to the extent that the City and the Developer are not adverse parties to the litigation. (9) The Developer understands that the City may subsidize or encourage the development of other developments in the City, including properties that compete with the Tax Abatement Property and the Project, and that such subsidies may be more favorable than the terms of this Agreement, and that the City has not represented that development of the Tax Abatement Project will be favored over the development of other properties. (10) The total development costs of the Project are estimated to be approximately $19,500,000 and the Project is economically feasible with the provision of the Tax Abatements by the City. The proposed development by the Developer hereunder would not occur but for the Tax Abatements being provided by the City hereunder. (11) The Developer will comply with all City ordinances, rules and regulations relating to traffic, parking, trash removal or public safety problems which may arise in connection with the construction and operation of the Project. (12) The Developer is not currently in default under any business subsidy agreement with any grantor, as such terms are defined in the Business Subsidy Act. (13) The Developer will provide and maintain or cause to be maintained at all times and, from time to time at the request of the City, furnish the City with proof of payment of premiums on insurance of amounts and coverages pursuant to Section 5.1 hereof. MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 ARTICLE III UNDERTAKINGS BY DEVELOPER AND CITY Section 3.1 Construction of Proiect and Reimbursement of Proiect Cost. (1) The costs of the Project shall be paid by the Developer. The Developer will cause the Project to be constructed in accordance with the construction plans submitted to City (the "Construction Plans") and at all times prior to the Termination Date will operate, maintain, preserve and keep the Project or cause the Project to be operated, maintained, preserved and kept with the appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof, in good repair and condition. (2) Upon completion of the Project in accordance with the Construction Plans as confirmed by the City in its sole discretion, the City shall reimburse the Developer (over the term of this Agreement) pursuant to the terms of the Tax Abatement Program as provided in Section 3.8 in an amount calculated in accordance therewith (the "Reimbursement Amount"). In no event shall the Reimbursement Amount exceed $378,515. Section 3.2 Limitations on Undertaking of the Citv. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 3.1 and 3.8, the City shall have no obligation to the Developer under this Agreement to reimburse the Developer for the Project Costs, if the City, at the time or times such payment is to be made, is entitled under Section 4.2 to exercise any of the remedies set forth therein as a result of an Event of Default unless and until such time as the Event of Default has been cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the City. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation to the Developer under this Agreement to reimburse the Developer for the Project Costs in an amount greater than $378,515. Section 3.3 Commencement and Completion of Construction. The Developer shall commence construction of the Project no later than December 31, 2024 and, barring Unavoidable Delays, shall complete the Project by December 31, 2025. All work with respect to the Project to be constructed or provided by the Developer shall be in conformity with the Construction Plans. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to impair or limit any of the City's procedures, rights or responsibilities under its zoning laws and policies. Section 3.4 Damage and Destruction. In the event of damage or destruction of the Project the Developer shall repair or rebuild the Project or cause the Project to be repaired or rebuilt. Alternatively, the Developer may refund all Tax Abatements received from the City prior to the event of damage or destruction, and thereafter, this Agreement shall terminate. Section 3.5 Change in Use of Proiect. The City's obligations pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the continued operation of the Project by the Developer or an Affiliate during the term of this Agreement. A failure to comply with this Section shall be an Event of Default in accordance with Section 4.1 hereof. Section 3.6 Prohibition Against Transfer of Proiect and ASS1Qnment of Agreement. The Developer represents and agrees that, prior to the Termination Date, the Developer shall not transfer this Agreement, the Project or the Tax Abatement Property or any part thereof or any interest therein, except to an Affiliate with written notice to the City, without the prior written approval of the City. The City 6 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 shall be entitled to require as conditions to any such transfer approval that: (1) Any proposed transferee shall have the qualifications and financial responsibility, in the reasonable judgment of the City, necessary and adequate to fulfill the obligations undertaken in this Agreement by the Developer. (2) Any proposed transferee, by instrument in writing satisfactory to the City shall, for itself and its successors and assigns, and expressly for the benefit of the City, have expressly assumed all of the obligations of the Developer under this Agreement and agreed to be subject to all the conditions and restrictions to which the Developer is subject. (3) There shall be submitted to the City for review and prior written approval all instruments and other legal documents involved in effecting the transfer of any interest in this Agreement, the Project or the Tax Abatement Property. (4) The Developer shall have paid all reasonable legal fees and expenses of the City, including fees of the City Attorney's office and outside counsel retained by the City to review the documents submitted to the City in connection with any transfer. Section 3.7 Real Pronertv Taxes. The Developer shall, so long as this Agreement remains in effect, pay or cause to be paid all real property taxes with respect to all parts of the Tax Abatement Property acquired, owned or leased by it which are payable pursuant to any statutory or contractual duty that shall accrue subsequent to the date of its acquisition of title to the Tax Abatement Property (or part thereof) and until title to the property is vested in another person. The Developer further acknowledges that failure of the Developer to commence and complete the Project by the time set forth in Section 3.3 could reduce the amount of Tax Abatements below the Reimbursement Amount. The Developer agrees that for tax assessments so long as this Agreement remains in effect: (1) That for itself, its successors and assigns, in addition to the obligation pursuant to statute to pay real estate taxes, it is also obligated by reason of this Agreement to pay before delinquency all real estate taxes assessed against the Tax Abatement Property and the Project. The Developer acknowledges that this obligation creates a contractual right on behalf of the City to sue the Developer or its successors and assigns to collect delinquent real estate taxes and any penalty or interest thereon and to pay over the same as a tax payment to the County auditor. In any such suit, the City also be entitled to recover its costs, expenses and reasonable attorney fees. (2) It will not seek administrative review or judicial review of the applicability of any tax statute relating to the ad valorem property taxation of real property contained on the Tax Abatement Property determined by any tax official to be applicable to the Project or the Developer or raise the inapplicability of any such tax statute as a defense in any proceedings with respect to the Tax Abatement Property, including delinquent tax proceedings; (3) It will not seek administrative review or judicial review of the constitutionality of any tax statute relating to the taxation of real property contained on the Tax Abatement Property determined by any tax official to be applicable to the Project or the Developer or raise the unconstitutionality of any such tax statute as a defense in any proceedings, including delinquent tax proceedings with respect to the Tax Abatement Property; provided, however, "tax statute" does not include any local ordinance or resolution levying a tax; 7 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 (4) It will not seek any tax deferral or abatement, either presently or prospectively authorized under any State or federal law, of the ad valorem property taxation of the Tax Abatement Property so long as this Agreement remains in effect; (5) Prior to the Termination Date, it will not cause a reduction in the real property taxes paid in respect of the Tax Abatement Property through: (i) willful destruction of the Project or any part thereof, or (ii) willful refusal to reconstruct damaged or destroyed property. The Developer also agrees that it will not, prior to the Termination Date, take any action which will result in the Tax Abatement Property becoming exempt from real estate property taxes or transfer or permit transfer of the Tax Abatement Property to any entity whose ownership or operation of the property would result in the Tax Abatement Property being exempt from real estate property taxes under State law; and (6) Prior to the Termination Date, it will not challenge the market value of the Tax Abatement Property with any governmental entity. Section 3.8 Tax Abatement Program. The Tax Abatement Program shall exist for a period of up to 10 years from the years 2027 to 2036. (1) The City shall make the first payment of Tax Abatements to the Developer on the later of August 1, 2027 or the date that (A) the City has determined that the Project has been constructed in accordance with Construction Plans approved by the City in accordance with Section 3.3 hereof; (B) the Developer has submitted to the City paid invoices for the Project Costs; (C) the Developer has paid all of the City's Administrative Costs required to have been paid as of such date in accordance with Section 3.10 hereof, and (D) no Event of Default exists hereunder (the "Initial Payment Date"). From the Initial Payment Date and on each February 1 and August 1 thereafter and continuing until the earlier of the date that the Developer shall have received the Reimbursement Amount or the Termination Date, the City shall pay the Developer the amount of the Tax Abatements actually received by the City from the City in the previous six-month period. The City may terminate the Tax Abatement Program and this Agreement at an earlier date if an Event of Default occurs and the City rescinds or cancels this Agreement as more fully set forth in Article V herein. (2) The Developer acknowledges that it has not relied on any representations of the City, or any of their officers, agents, or employees, and has not relied on any opinion of any attorney of the City, as to the Federal or State income tax consequences relating to the Tax Abatement payments under this Section. The payment of Tax Abatements is subject to all the terms and conditions of the Tax Abatement Program. The Tax Abatements are payable solely from and to the extent of the Tax Abatements actually received by the City, and nothing herein shall be construed to obligate the City to make payments from any other funds. (3) The Developer acknowledges that the City shall in no event be obligated to make any payment of Tax Abatements under this Section to Developer unless and until (i) all ad valorem property taxes due and payable with respect to the Tax Abatement Property as of the applicable payment date have been paid in full and (ii) the City has received from the County or any other source as provided by law an ad valorem property tax distribution that includes all or any portion of the Tax Abatements. (4) The Developer acknowledged that a failure to complete construction of the Project 8 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 in accordance with the timelines set forth in Section 3.3 hereof constitutes an Event of Default and could reduce the amount of the Tax Abatements below the Reimbursement Amount. (5) The Developer acknowledges that all estimates of Tax Abatements that have been prepared by or on behalf of the City have been done for the City's use only and neither the City nor their consultants shall have liability to Developer if the actual Tax Abatements are less than the amounts estimated. (6) The Developer further acknowledges that the total Tax Abatements attributable to any calendar year (i.e., the combined payments on Payment Dates of August 1 and the following February 1) may not exceed the greater of $200,000 or 10% of the City's Net Tax Capacity for that tax -payable year (the "Statutory Cap"), all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1813, Subdivision 8. The City reasonably expects that the Statutory Cap will not cause the Tax Abatements under this Agreement to be reduced; however, Developer acknowledges that, during the term of the Tax Abatement under this Section, if the total abatements payable by the City under the Tax Abatement Act in any year would exceed either of their respective Statutory Caps, the Statutory Cap is allocated first to any of the City's existing abatement obligations as applicable, second to the Tax Abatements payable under this Agreement, and third to any other abatements granted after the date of this Agreement. Section 3.9 Business Subsidv Act. (1) In order to satisfy the provisions of the Business Subsidy Act, the Developer acknowledges and agrees that the amount of the "Business Subsidy" granted to the Developer under this Agreement is the Reimbursement Amount, and that the Business Subsidy is needed because the Project may not be feasible for the Developer to undertake without the Business Subsidy. The public purpose of the Business Subsidy is to increase the tax base, help provide services to residents, help promote tourism in the City, and help create employment opportunities in the City and the State. The Developer agrees that it will meet the following goals (the "Goals"): create at least 42 full-time equivalent jobs in connection with the development of the Project on the Tax Abatement Property with an average hourly wage of at least $22.30 per hour, excluding benefits, not later than two years from the Benefit Date (the "Compliance Date"). (2) The Developer must continue operation of the Project as a hotel for at least 5 years after the Benefit Date. (3) If the Developer fails to meet the goals described in Section 3.9(1) and 3.9(2), the Developer shall repay to the City upon written demand from the City a "pro rata share" of the Business Subsidy received by the Developer together with interest on that amount at the implicit price deflator as provided in Section 116J.994, subd. 6 of the Business Subsidy Act, accrued from the date of substantial completion of the Project to the date of payment. The term "pro rata share" means percentages calculated as follows: (a) if the failure relates to the number of jobs, the jobs required less the jobs created, divided by the jobs required; (b) if the failure relates to wages, the number of jobs required less the number of jobs that meet the required wages, divided by the number of jobs required; 9 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 (c) if the failure relates to maintenance of the facility as a hotel in accordance with Section 3.9(2) 60 less the number of months of operation as a hotel (where any month in which the hotel is in operation for at least 15 days constitutes a month of operation), commencing on the Benefit Date and ending with the date the hotel ceases operation as determined by City, divided by 60; and (iv) if more than one of clauses (i) through (iii) apply, the sum of the applicable percentages, not to exceed 100%. In addition to the remedy described in this Section and any other remedy available to the City for failure to meet the Goals stated in this Section, the Developer agrees and understands that it may not receive a business subsidy from the City or any other grantor (as defined in the Business Subsidy Act Act) for a period of 5 years from the date of the failure unless the Developer satisfies its repayment obligation under this Section, whichever occurs first. (4) The Developer agrees to (i) report its progress on achieving the Goals to the City until the later of the date the Goals are met or the Compliance Date, or, if the Goals are not met, until the date the Business Subsidy is repaid, (ii) include in the report the information required in Section 116J.994, Subdivision 7 of the Business Subsidy Act on forms developed by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, and (iii) send completed reports to the City. The City shall have the right to inspect the Developer's books and records to verify compliance with the requirements of this Section. The Developer agrees to file these reports no later than March 1 of each year commencing March 1, 2026, and within 30 days after the Compliance Date. The City agrees that if it does not receive the reports by such date, it will mail the Developer a warning within one week of the required filing date. If the reports are not made within 14 days of the post marked date of the warning, the Developer agrees to pay to the City a penalty of $100 for each subsequent day until the report is filed up to a maximum of $1,000. (5) In addition to the tax abatement assistance from the City paid pursuant to this Agreement, it is anticipated that the County will also provide the Developer with tax abatement assistance for the Project in an amount not to exceed $364,140. (6) The Developer does not have a parent corporation. Section 3.10 Administrative Costs. The City acknowledges that Developer has deposited $10,000 with the City. The City will use such deposit to pay "Administrative Costs," which term means out of pocket costs incurred by the City together with staff costs of the City, all attributable to or incurred in connection with the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement, the Tax Abatement Program, and other documents and agreements in connection with the development of the Tax Abatement Property. In addition, certain engineering, environmental advisor, legal, land use, zoning, subdivision and other costs related to the development of the Tax Abatement Property are required to be paid, as provided in accordance with the City's planning, zoning, and building fee schedules. At Developer's request, but no more often than monthly, the City will provide Developer with a written report including invoices, time sheets or other comparable evidence of expenditures for Administrative Costs and the outstanding balance of funds deposited. If at any time the City determines that the deposit is insufficient to pay Administrative Costs, the Developer is obligated to pay such shortfall within twenty (20) days after receipt of a written notice from the City containing evidence of the unpaid costs. If any balance of funds deposited remains after the Benefit Date, the City shall promptly return such balance to Developer; provided that Developer remains obligated to pay subsequent Administrative Costs related to any amendments to this Agreement requested by Developer. Upon termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, the Developer remains obligated under this section for Administrative Costs. 10 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 Section 3.11 Records. The City, through any authorized representatives, shall have the right at all reasonable times after reasonable notice to inspect, examine and copy all books and records of Developer relating to the Project. Such records shall be kept and maintained by Developer through the Termination Date. 11 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 ARTICLE IV EVENTS OF DEFAULT Section 4.1 Events of Default Defined. The following shall be "Events of Default" under this Agreement and the term "Event of Default" shall mean whenever it is used in this Agreement any one or more of the following events: (1) Failure by the Developer to timely pay any ad valorem real property taxes, special assessments, utility charges or other governmental impositions with respect to the Project or the Tax Abatement Property. (2) Failure by the Developer to cause the Project to be completed pursuant to the terms, conditions and limitations of this Agreement. (3) Failure by the Developer to observe or perform any other covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement. (4) If the Developer shall: (a) file any petition in bankruptcy or for any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under the United States Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended or under any similar federal or state law; or (b) be adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent; or if a petition or answer proposing the adjudication of the Developer, as a bankrupt or its reorganization under any present or future federal bankruptcy act or any similar federal or state law shall be filed in any court and such petition or answer shall not be discharged or denied within 60 days after the filing thereof, or a receiver, trustee or liquidator of the Developer, or of the Project, or part thereof, shall be appointed in any proceeding brought against the Developer, and shall not be discharged within 60 days after such appointment, or if the Developer, shall consent to or acquiesce in such appointment. Section 4.2 Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default referred to in Section 4.1 occurs and is continuing, the City may take any one or more of the following actions after the giving of 30 days' written notice to the Developer citing with specificity the item or items of default and notifying the Developer that it has 30 days within which to cure said Event of Default. If the Event of Default has not been cured within said 30 days: (1) The City may suspend its performance under this Agreement including, but not limited to, making payments hereunder, until it receives assurances from the Developer, deemed adequate by the City in its sole discretion, that the Developer will cure its default and continue its performance under this Agreement. (2) The City may terminate this Agreement and the Tax Abatement Program and terminate the payment of Tax Abatements to the Developer. (3) The City may take any action, including legal or administrative action, in law or 12 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 equity, which may appear necessary or desirable to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the Developer under this Agreement. Section 4.3 No Remedv Exclusive. No remedy expressed conferred herein upon or reserved to the City is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. Section 4.4 No Implied Waiver. In the event any agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by the other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. Section 4.5 Agreement to Pav Attornev's Fees and Expenses. Whenever any Event of Default occurs and the City shall employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of payments due or to become due or for the enforcement or performance or observance of any obligation or agreement on the part of the Developer herein contained, the Developer agrees that it shall, on demand therefor, pay to the City the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other expenses so incurred by the City. Section 4.6 Release and Indemnification Covenants. (1) The Developer, and the Developer's successors or assigns, releases from and covenants and agrees that the City and its governing body members, officers, agents, servants and employees shall not be liable for and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its governing body members, officers, agents, servants, and employees against any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about or resulting from the Project. (2) Except for any willful misrepresentation or any willful or wanton misconduct of the following named parties, the Developer agrees to protect and defend the City and its governing body members, officers, agents, servants and employees, now or forever, and further agrees to hold the aforesaid harmless from any claim, demand, action or other proceeding whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly arising from a breach of the obligations of the Developer under this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby. (3) The City and its governing body members, officers, agents, servants and employees shall not be liable for any damages or injury to the persons or property of the Developer or its officers, agents, servants or employees or any other person due to any act of negligence of any person. (4) All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the City contained herein shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the City and not of any governing body member, officer, agent, servant or employee of the City in the individual capacity thereof. 13 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 ARTICLE V ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS Section 5.1 Insurance. (1) The Developer will provide and maintain at all times during the process of constructing the Project an All -Risk Broad Form Basis Insurance Policy and, from time to time during that period, at the request of the City, furnish the City with proof of payment of premiums on policies covering the following: (a) Builder's risk insurance, written on the so-called "Builder's Risk -- Completed Value Basis," in an amount equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the Tax Abatement Notes, and with coverage available in nonreporting form on the so-called "all risk" form of policy. The interests of the City shall be protected in accordance with a clause in form and content satisfactory to the City; (b) Comprehensive general liability insurance (including operations, contingent liability, operations of subcontractors, completed operations, and contractual liability insurance) together with an Owner's Protective Liability Policy with limits against bodily injury and property damage of not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence (to accomplish the above - required limits, an umbrella excess liability policy may be used). The City shall be listed as an additional insured party on the policy; and (c) Workers' compensation insurance, with statutory coverage, provided that the Developer may be self -insured with respect to all or any part of its liability for workers' compensation. (2) Upon completion of construction of the Project and prior to the Termination Date, the Developer shall maintain, or cause to be maintained, at its cost and expense, and from time to time at the request of the City shall furnish proof of the payment of premiums on, insurance as follows: (a) Insurance against loss and/or damage to the Project under a policy or policies covering such risks as are ordinarily insured against by similar businesses. (b) Comprehensive general public liability insurance, including personal injury liability (with employee exclusion deleted), against liability for injuries to persons and/or property, in the minimum amount for each occurrence and for each year of $1,000,000, and shall be endorsed to show the City as an additional insured party. (c) Such other insurance, including workers' compensation insurance respecting all employees of the Developer, in such amount as is customarily carried by like organizations engaged in like activities of comparable size and liability exposure; provided that the Developer may be self -insured with respect to all or any part of its liability for workers' compensation. (3) All insurance required in this Agreement shall be taken out and maintained in 14 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 responsible insurance companies selected by the Developer that are authorized under the laws of the State to assume the risks covered thereby. Upon request, the Developer will deposit annually with the City, policies evidencing all such insurance, or a certificate or certificates or binders of the respective insurers stating that such insurance is in force and effect. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement each policy shall contain a provision that the insurer shall not cancel nor modify it in such a way as to reduce the coverage provided below the amounts required herein without giving written notice to the Developer and the City at least 30 days before the cancellation or modification becomes effective. In lieu of separate policies, the Developer may maintain a single policy, blanket or umbrella policies, or a combination thereof, having the coverage required herein, in which event the Developer shall deposit with the City a certificate or certificates of the respective insurers as to the amount of coverage in force upon the Project. (4) The Developer agrees to notify the City immediately in the case of damage exceeding $100,000 in amount to, or destruction of, the Project or any portion thereof resulting from fire or other casualty. In such event the Developer will forthwith repair, reconstruct, and restore the Project to substantially the same or an improved condition or value as it existed prior to the event causing such damage and, to the extent necessary to accomplish such repair, reconstruction, and restoration, the Developer will apply the net proceeds of any insurance relating to such damage received by the Developer to the payment or reimbursement of the costs thereof. The Developer shall complete the repair, reconstruction and restoration of the Project regardless of whether the net proceeds of insurance received by the Developer for such purposes are sufficient to pay for the same. Any net proceeds remaining after completion of such repairs, construction, and restoration shall be the property of the Developer. A failure to promptly repair, reconstruct and restore the Project as required by this Section 5.1(4) will be considered an Event of Default under this Agreement and the City may suspend payments of the Tax Abatements under the Tax Abatement Program, or exercise any other remedies provided in Section 4.2 hereof. (5) All of the insurance provisions set forth in this Section shall terminate on the Termination Date. Section 5.2 Conflicts of Interest. No member of the governing body or other official of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the Tax Abatement Property or the Project, or any contract, agreement or other transaction contemplated to occur or be undertaken thereunder or with respect thereto, nor shall any such member of the governing body or other official participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested. No member, official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the City in the event of any default or breach by the Developer or successor or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. Section 5.3 Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, articles and sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. Section 5.4 Notices and Demands. A notice, demand, warning or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally, and 15 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 (1) in the case of the Developer is addressed to: Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC 1910 42" d Avenue West Ste. 300 Alexandria, MN 56308-0029 Attn: (2) in the case of the City is addressed to: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Attn: City Administrator or at such other address with respect to any such parry as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. Section 5.5 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 5.6 Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 5.7 Duration. This Agreement shall terminate on the Termination Date. Section 5.8 Provisions Surviving Rescission or Expiration. Sections 4.5 and 4.6 shall survive any rescission, termination or expiration of this Agreement with respect to or arising out of any event, occurrence or circumstance existing prior to the date thereof. Section 5.9 Superseding Effect. This Agreement reflects the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the development of the Tax Abatement Property, and supersedes in all respects all prior agreements of the parties, whether written or otherwise, with respect to the development of the Tax Abatement Property Section 5.10 Recording. The City may record this Agreement and any amendments thereto with the County recorder. The Developer shall pay all costs for recording. Section 5.11 Relationship of Parties. Nothing in this Agreement is intended, or shall be construed, to create a partnership or joint venture among or between the parties hereto, and the rights and remedies of the parties hereto shall be strictly as set forth in this Agreement. All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the contained herein shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the City and not of any governing body member, officer, agent, servant or employee of the City. Section 5.12 Interpretation; Concurrence. The language in this Agreement shall be construed simply according to its generally understood meaning, and not strictly for or against any party and no interpretation shall be affected by which party drafted any part of this Agreement. By executing this Agreement, the parties acknowledge that they (a) enter into and execute this Agreement knowingly, voluntarily and willingly of their own volition with such consultation with legal counsel as they deem 16 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 appropriate; (b) have had a sufficient amount of time to consider this Agreement's terms and conditions, and to consult an attorney before signing this Agreement; (c) have read this Agreement, understand all of its terms, appreciate the significance of those terms and have made the decision to accept them as stated herein; and (d) have not relied upon any representation or statement not set forth herein. Section 5.13 Data Practices. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of the Developer's performance of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, and any other applicable state statutes, any state rules adopted to implement the Act and statutes, as well as federal statutes and regulations on data privacy. 17 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have each caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its name and on its behalf, on or as of the date first written above. MONTICELLO HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC Lo STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 12024, by , the of Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public This is a signature page to the Tax Abatement Agreement by and between the City of Monticello, Minnesota and Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC S-1 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA By Its Mayor By Its City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 12024, by and , the Mayor and the City Administrator of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the City. Notary Public This is a signature page to the Tax Abatement Agreement by and between the City of Monticello, Minnesota and Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC S-2 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY That certain property in the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, legally described as: [INSERT] A-1 MN 190\ 180\946467.v5 Fairfield Inn and Suites City of Monticello Economic Development Authority Application for Business Assistance Financing EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GoodNeighbor Properties is excited to propose the development of a 98 room Fairfield Inn and Suites and a Branded 130 seat Restaurant on property in The Pointes at Cedar District. The hotel's owner, Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC., will bring Monticello its first Marriott brand hotel. The four-story hotel will feature 98 rooms, an indoor pool, meeting space, exercise area, and breakfast dining space for guests. The Hotel project will be situated on the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Chelsea Road and Edmonson Ave. Launched in 1987, Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott is designed for today's traveler who is looking to be productive on the road, whether for business or leisure. In addition to complimentary Wi-Fi and breakfast, Fairfield Inn & Suites offers thoughtfully designed rooms and suites that provide separate living, working, and sleeping areas. With more than 700 properties throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico, Fairfield Inn & Suites hotels participate in the award -winning Marriott Rewards' frequent travel program that allows members to earn hotel points or airline miles for every dollar spent during each stay. The requested tax abatement will provide an avenue to a targeted return needed to raise equity and bank financing. Additionally, it would provide the project flexibility to incorporate requested design features in the Pointes at Cedar District. This development will provide more than 30 jobs and will provide an asset to local businesses, public events, and tourism. Marriott Bonvoy is known for its industry leading rewards program which will draw in local business travelers as well as providing an attractive option for community events and local travel. The name recognition of a hotel and restaurant will also provide an attractive draw off of the freeway. EXHIBITS 1) Land Use Application.2024.FF.v2 3.5.24 2) GNP Development References — 3-6-24 3) Proforma Analysis 4) Contribution Agreement — Monticello Hospitality Group + Deephaven Development We kindly thank the Economic Development Authority for their attention to our submission. We look forward to delivering a development that makes the community proud and brings positive synergy with the surrounding developments and local businesses. Respectfully, Rob Thompson and Ted Christianson GoodNeighbor Properties 4-5-24 Jim Thares City Of Monticello Employment for New Development for the Monticello Hospitality Group Fairfield inn & suites By Marriott General Manager (1 FT) ------------------- $70,000 - $75,000 Assistant Manager(1 FT) ------------------- $ 40,000- 50,000 Front Office Manager (1 FT) $40,000 — 43,000 Front Desk (4 FT) ------------------------------ $35,000- 40,000 Night Auditor (1 FT) -------------------------- $ $40,000- 45,000 Chief Engineer (1 FT) ---------------------- $ 47,000 Maintenance technicians (2-PT)--------- $18-22 per hour Laundry (1)-------------------------------------$ 2 0- 22 per hour Breakfast/kitchen (2 PT) --------------------- $20-25 per hour Housekeeping ( 8-12 PT)-------------------- $18-25 per hour Groundskeeper (2-3 PT)--------------------- $ 20-25 per hour Restaurant General Manager (1 FT) -------------------------- $55,000-65,000 Assistant Manager(1 ft)--------------------------- $ 40,000- 45,000 Bar Manager (1 FT) --------------------------------- $45,000 — 50,000 Kitchen manager(1FT)---------------------------- $ 45,000- 50,000 Line cooks (2-4 FT) --------------------------------- $ 22 -25 per hour Servers ( 10 FT) $25 per hour with tips Dishwasher ( 2 FT) ---------------------------------- $ 18-22 per hour Prep and expo ( 4-6 PT) ---------------------------- $18- 22 per hour Maintenance/ cleaning (2 FT) ------------------ $ 20 -25 per hour CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUSINESS SUBSIDY APPLICATION BUSINESS ASSISTANCE FINANCING Legal name of applicant: Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC Address: 1910 42" d Ave West, Suite 300 Alexandria, MN 56308 Telephone number: 612-812-1563 (Rob) & 701-361-3734 ( Ted C) Rob Thompson or Ted Christianson Name of contact person: REQUESTED INFORMATION Addendum shall be attached hereto addressing in detail the following: 1. A map showing the exact boundaries of proposed development. 2. Give a general description of the project including size and location of building(s); business type or use; traffic information including parking, projected vehicle counts and traffic flow; timing of the project; estimated market value following completion. 3. The existing Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use designation and zoning of the property. Include a statement as to how the proposed development will conform to the land use designation and how the property will be zoned. 4. A statement identifying how the increment assistance will be used and why it is necessary to undertake the project. 5. A statement identifying the public benefits of the proposal including estimated increase in property valuation, new jobs to be created, hourly wages and other community assets. 6. A written description of the developer's business, principals, history and past projects I understand that the application fee will be used for EDA staff and consultant costs and may be partially refundable if the request for assistance is withdrawn. Refunds will be made at the discretion of the EDA Board and be based on the costs incurred by the EDA prior to withdraw of the request for assistance. If the initial application fee is insufficient, I will be responsible for additional deposits. SIGNATURE Applicant's signature: Date: y ` '?y CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Application for Business Assistance Financing GENERAL INFORMATION: Business Name: Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC Date: 3-1-24 1910 42°d Ave West, Suite 300 Alexandria, MN 56308 Address: Type (Partnership, etc.): Limited Liability Company Rob Thompson or Ted Christianson 612-812-1563 (Rob) Authorized Representative: Phone: 701-361-3734 (Ted) 98 room Fairfield Inn & Suites By Marriott and Restaurant and 130 Seat Description of Business: Restaurant Legal Counsel: Amy Clark- Smith and Strege, LTD. 321 Dakota Avenue I PO Box 38 701-642-2668 Address: Whapeton , ND Phone: FINANCIAL BACKGROUND: 1. Have you ever filed for bankruptcy? NO 2. Have you ever defaulted on any loan commitment? In the Process with Sarah Kortmansky 3. Have you applied for conventional financing for the project? Of North Star Bank 4. List financial references: Corey Simonson — First Western Bank, Alexandria, MN 320-760-6374 a. b. Craig Olson — Bremer Bank, Alexandria, MN, 320-815-1126 2 Jon Kretchman — JBK Funding, Fatgo, ND 701-371-6487 C. Yes 5. Have you ever used Business Assistance Financing before? The Rune in Alexandria with AAEDC, Hatchery Row in Battle Lake MN with their EDA. Both projects are under construction and used TIF. The Cottage in Fergus Falls, MN completed using 20-year tax If yes, what, where and when? abatement. PROJECT INFORMATION: 1. Location of Proposed Project: Abatement of taxes for 15 years of maximum time 2. Amount of Business Assistance requested? allowed The abatement will assist in providing a feasible investment return and help in obtaining Bank Financing. Additionally the abatement would provide the project flexibility to incorporate the 3. Need for Business Assistance: requested design features in the Pointes at Cedar District 4. Present ownership of site: DeepHaven 30+ 5. Number of permanent jobs created as a result of project? $0 currently 6. Estimated annual sales: Present: Year 1 - $2,500,000 Future: 7. Market value of project following completion: Approximatelyl8 million June 2024 8. Anticipated start date: FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Completion Date: 1. Estimated project related costs: a. Land acquisition $ 1,000,000 b. Site development 650,000 c. Building cost 12,850,000 d. Equipment 2,500,000 e. Architectural/engineering fee 425,000 Year 5 $4,000,000 May 2025 3 f. Legal fees 55,000 g. Off -site development costs/soft costs 1,910,000 2. Source of financing: $ 75% or approximately a. Private financing institution $13,500,000 Abatement doesn't provide b. Tax increment funds any cash up front c. Other public funds 25%- or approximately d. Developer equity $4,500,000 4 PLEASE INCLUDE: 1. Preliminary financial commitment from bank. 75% of project costs 2. Plans and drawing of project. Exhibit 1 3. Background material of company.Exhibit 2 4. Pro Forma analysis. Exhibit 3 5. Financial statements. 6. Statement of property ownership or control. Exhibit 4 7. Payment of application fee of $250.00 GoodNeighbor Properties, LLC Rob Thompson Ted Christianson Managing Member Managing Member 1910 42nd Ave C 1612.812.1563 C 701.361.3734 Alexandria, MN 563o8 E rob.thompsonaa gnproperties. net E ted.christiansonaa gnproperties.net www.gnproperties.net CONTENTS ABOUT US 3 DEVELOPMENT TEAM 4 TITAN MACHINERY DEALERSHIPS 5 SUNOPTA WAREHOUSE 6 2010 BUILDING 7 igio BUILDING 8 FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES g TITAN MACHINERY SRC 10 MAPLEWOOD MANOR 11 GNP LONGTREES WOODFIRE GRILL 12 BOULDER TAPHOUSE 13 THE COTTAGE 14 CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS 15 C.I. CONSTRUCTION Since the 1.940s, C.I. Construction, LLC has gained a hard-earned reputation specializing in Design -Build Construction and Construction Management. Our commitment to building solid, lasting relationships is evident in our continued success. We strive to develop relationships that are based on respect, trust, and honesty. This is What we firmly believe sets us apart from other companies and what has provided us with a List of distinguished past customers today. In fact, quality of construction and good customer relations are the cornerstones of our business. Our design -build construction experience, our in-house design capabilities and our experience With a diverse range of procurement methods ensure that your goals for quality, budget, schedule, and scope are always realized no matter Where you are building your building project. We take great pride in our ability to offer our clients expertise at every stage of the construction process. Our longevity is a testament to the value we provide Owners. BUILDING DESIGN By combining creative design capabilities with quality products in masonry, concrete, wood or Butler® steel buildings, we create a facility that works for you. Since the 1940s, we have been dedicated to providing uncompromised service to our clients and professional growth and fulfillment for our employees. In short, we take great pride in helping our clients see their dream become a reality. Our in-house design team uses Revit by Autodesk. By utilizing BIM (Building Information ModeLing) technology you are able to visualize your investment day one. Being able to view the model from different simulated views gives the Owner the flexibility to make design changes before the project has started. This gives the Owner maximum design flexibility before costs are locked in, and Limits the last minute changes that can be budget and schedule killers. As an experienced BIM team we are able to work as Primary Designers or collaborate with a Design Team of Architects and Engineers to avoid costly design clashes that tend to surface when 3D modeling is not utilized. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Every owner has different needs, and with our diverse experiences in project delivery methods we can find the right fit for your project. Our company has specialized in a value-added delivery method referred to as Multiple Prime Contracting. While many Construction Managers go the easy route and select one General Contractor our team breaks each project down into smaller scopes to minimize markups and find the best value for the Owner with each trade. Many Construction Managers may shy away from the added work of Multiple Prime Contracting. We utilize our experience and Best -In -Class project management and contract software to make sure all Contractors are working towards the common goal of delivering a project on time and on budget. 2410 BUILDING - ALEXANDRIA, MN ROB THOMPSON FOUNDING PARTNER / MANAGING MEMBER •35+ years of Real Estate Development Experience •President/Owner of C.I. Construction •Business Degree from St. John's University TED CHRISTIANSON (�UNDING PARTNER / MANAGING MEMBER 9 1\1� I •30+years of Real Estate Development Experience •President/Managing Partner of Adam Smith Properties •Masters Degree from North Dakota State University TITAN MACHINERY DEALERSHIPS %%6- �,����iill[[f�� r- DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Project Location: Multiple Locations in MN, ND, SD, IA, NE Total SF: 1,021,757 Facility overviews: Farm equipment dealerships including office space, shop, wash bay, parts, and retail spaces. Most sites also include standalone equipment stor- age facility. Development roles: Assisted in land acquisition, assisted in obtained financing, designed project, built by C.I. Construction. Property Owner: Dealer Sites Contact: John Kretchman 701-371-6487 Tenant: Titan Machinery Contact: Peter Christianson 701-238-4418 W 46TH STREET, A GOODNEIGHBOR PROPERTY - I K�' ILIR I0 - 0 U__ PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS PROJECT LOCATION: Alexandria, MN TOTAL SF; 252,000 DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Pre-engineered building with MR-24 roof and Precast wall panels. Features Cooler/Freezer storage as well as an incubator room. Land acquisition, obtained financing, designed project, built by Cl Construction. Coordinated pipeline easement with NuStar Energy. Overcame zoning challenges with lakeshore setbacks and wetland mitigation. Obtained TIF Financing, FINANCING ENTITY: Bremer Bank TENANTS: SunOpta \ / /*\-7 /*\-7 / \ / / \ , 1 2oio BUILDING, A GOODNEIGHBOR PROPERTY F, - PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS PROJECT LOCATION: Alexandria, MN TOTAL SF: 48,278 DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Land acquisition, obtained financing, designed project, built by Cl Construction. Coordinated pipeline easement with NuStar Energy. Maximized b MR-24 seamed roof and 4" insulated metal panels. A construction per tenants request FINANCING ENTITY: 1st Western Bank TENANTS: ECM, Servepro sgso BUILDING DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Project Location: Alexandria, MN TotaL SF: 47,511 Property Owner: GoodNeighbors - 1910 Building, LLC Facility overview: Initial buildout 26,931SF, 20,580SF addition. Warehouse, loading docks, and offices, Development roles: Acquired land, obtained financing, designed project, built by C.I. Construction. Financing Contact: Corey Simonson - 1st Western Bank — VP Commercial Lending (320) 335-6006 Tenants: Douglas Machinery, ServePro, CI Construction Tenant Contact: Jim Winkels Douglas Machine Inc - (32o) 815-0748 FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES T If l IG � 11 1� � ; 11 11 DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Project Location: Alexandria, MN Total SF: 44,835 Facility overviews: Three story 80 room Marriott brand hotel. Includes meeting space, Indoor Pool, and Fitness Room. Development roles: Acquired land, obtained financing, designed project, obtained franchise license, built by C.I. Construction. — Financing Contact: Bremer Bank - Craig Olson - VP Commercial Lending (320) 762-4707 Property Owner: Alexandria Hotel Group, LLC Hotel Management Company: American Hospitality Management Contact: Fred Kindle (231) 881-1140 TITAN MACHINERY - SHARED RESOURCE CENTER 0 .A0100T W sib DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Project Location: Fargo, ND Total SF: 78,700 Facility overviews: Corporate headquarters of Titan Machinery featuring offices, � shop training, Warehouse, kitchen facility, and cafeteria, Development roles: Assisted in land acquisition, designed project, built by C.I. Construction. Property Owner: Dealer Sites, LLC Contact: John Kretchman 701-371-6487 = Tenant: Titan Machinery - t Contact: Peter Christianson 701-238-4418 MAPLEWOOD MANOR -73 ' MANOR 1010 1st ST. N.E f^. ir.�.r ._ ..t.l�, .a `- -• .Ct DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Project Location: Elbow Lake, MN TotaL SF: 43,139 Facility overview: Remodel and addition to old hospital and connected apart- ments. Converted to assisted living facility. Development roles: Acquired land, designed project, negotiated TIF and grant money, built by C.I. Construction. Financing Contact: Craig Olson - Bremer Bank - (320) 762-470' Property Owner: GoodNeighbors - Maplewood Manor, LLC Operation Management Company - Northern Oaks Senior Living Contact: Amy Deacon - (701) 793-788o J- 7-f LONGTREFS WOODFIRE GRILL _� 'rip . i _',A DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Project Location: Alexandria, MN Total SF: 5.190 Development roles: Acquired land, obtained financing, designed project, built by C.I. Construction. Financing Entity: Bremer Bank Financing Contact: Craig Olson - VP Commerc Property Owner: GoodNeighbors South, LLC Tenant: Longtree's Woodfire Grill Contact: Mike Rakun (612) 799-0418 GOODNEIGHBORS 2 DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Project Location: Alexandria, MN Total SF: 7,432 Development roles: Acquired land, obtained financing, designed project, built by C.I. Construction. Financing Entity: ist Western Bank Financing Contact: Corey Simonson - VP Com (320) 335-6006 Tenants: Boulder Tap House, Cricket Wireless Tenant Contact: Jess Clark Boulder Taphouse 320-232-5205 Pits «. tv' : ".1 THE COTTAGE, A GOODNEIGHBOR PROPERTY .;f r W r AM - PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS PROJECT LOCATION: Fergus Falls, MN TOTAL SF: 37,132 PROJECT OVERVIEW: Remodel of historic building into an assisted living facility. Obtained financing, designed project, built by Cl Construction. Coordinated with National Park Service for Historic Tax Credit. PROPERTY OWNER: GoodNeighbors - The Cottage, LLC OPERATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY: Northern Oaks Senior Living 1� CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS COMPLETION IN 2024 NICOLe rernnOLZ - 32()-/n3-4545 THE HATCHERY MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT - BATTLE LAKE, MN Total SF: 46,834 Property Owner: GoodNeighbors - The Hatchery, LLC Tenants: Thrivent, Masonic Lodge, CAEP Tenant contact: Greg Smedsrud CAEP 218-770-2991 City of Battle Lake Contact: Val Martin 612-508-0459 U GNP 1(� northland Public Finance MEMORANDUM To: Jim Thares, City of Monticello From: Tammy Omdal, Managing Director Date: April 4, 2024 Re: Tax Abatement Assistance for Hotel/Restaurant Project Northland completed a review and analysis of the application for Tax Abatement assistance summitted by Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC (the "Developer') to the City of Monticello (the "City"). This memorandum includes a summary of the review and analysis. The proposed project by the Developer includes a 98-room Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott and 130-seat restaurant (the "Project"). The Wright County Assessor has provided a preliminary indication of taxable market value of $6,365,000 for the Project. The valuation for taxes payable will be determined by the Assessor after project completion and may vary from the preliminary estimate. The maximum City Tax Abatement assistance that may be available to assist the Project over a 10- year period is approximately $378,500 (future value), assuming exclusion of the base (current) value of the property. The average annual amount of the Tax Abatement is approximately $37,000 per year. Public Purpose The proposed public purpose of the Tax Abatement assistance for the Project, which will be a business subsidy under Minnesota law, is to increase or preserve the tax base and to create and support economic development activity in the City. The application from the Developer states, in part, that the Tax Abatement is necessary to provide a feasible investment return and help in obtaining bank financing. Additionally, the Developer states that the Tax Abatement will provide the Project with financial flexibility to incorporate the City's requested design features in the Pointes at Cedar District. The Developer is continuing to refine their pro forma and assumptions. The Developer has provided the City with pro forma for the Project. Based on the information provided and the assumptions used by the Developer (inclusive of estimated vacancy rates and financing terms, among other information), Northland is of the opinion that the Project, without Tax Abatement assistance, is projected to produce a rate of return that is below what we would consider to be within industry standards. Northland estimates that with Tax Abatement the Project may achieve reasonable returns for a hotel/restaurant development and debt service coverage ratio which suggest the Project may be bankable. We have not received documentation from the Developer to show a financing commitment. Northland Securities, hic. 150 South Fifth Street Suite 3300, Minneapolis, MN 55402, Main Tel. 612-851-5900 www.northlandsecurlties.com I Member FINRA and SIPC I Registered with SEC and MSRB Monticello Tax Abatement April 4, 2024 Page 2 The Developer has continued to work on their pro forma. Estimates prepared by Northland and our opinion on the need for financial assistance for the Project may be impacted by revised information the Developer may present. The Developer is planning to request a Tax Abatement from Wright County. The Northland analysis includes assumption for both a City approved Tax Abatement and a County approved Tax Abatement. The County approval of a Tax Abatement is independent of the City approval of a Tax Abatement. Tax Abatement The name "tax abatement" is misleading. The enabling statute (Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 to 469.1815) does not authorize the actual "abatement of taxes". Instead, the respective taxing jurisdiction, city, county, and school district, can levy a property tax (an abatement levy) that is equivalent to taxes that could be abated by these taxing jurisdictions. To provide Tax Abatement assistance, the City will need to consider approval of the Tax Abatement following a public hearing. The City may consider approval of a Development Agreement with the Developer after the public hearing and after the City Council adopts a resolution authorizing the Tax Abatement. The authorizing resolution must include certain findings and specify the term (number of years) and maximum amount for the Tax Abatement, among other items. The proposed assistance to the Developer is on a pay -go basis. This means that the City would make semi-annual payments to the Developer, pursuant to terms of the Development Agreement, based on the City's receipt of property tax payments. Northland has prepared preliminary estimates for the Tax Abatement that may be available from the Project. The estimated Tax Abatement is based on tax abatement equal to the increase in City property taxes from the estimated increased taxable market value from the Project. Attachments Attached to this memo are the following reports: • Exhibit A: Estimated City and County Tax Abatement Based on Ten -Year Term. • Exhibit B: Source and Use of Funds For Construction, Prepared by Northland based on information provided by the Developer. • Exhibit C: Project Pro Forma, Prepared by Northland based on information provided by the Developer and information prepared independently by Northland. Exhibit A City of Monticello Hotel with Restaurant Project Projected Cash Flow from Tax Abatement Captured City Net County Net School Net Combined Total TIF Taxes Taxable Tax Tax Tax Tax Combined Total for All City Tax County Tax School Tax Property District Payable Market Value Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Taxing Abatement Abatement Abatement Taxes Year Year (TMV) for Tax Rate Rate Rate Jurisdictions Payable Abatement 1 2027 3,182,500 44,616 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.549/o 30,741 15,668 15,073 0 76,933 2 2028 6,428,650 109,539 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.549/o 75,474 38,468 37,007 0 156,076 3 2029 6,492,937 110,825 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.54% 76,360 38,919 37,441 0 157,644 4 2030 6,557,866 112,123 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.54% 77,255 39,375 37,880 0 159,227 5 2031 6,623,445 113,435 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.54% 78,158 39,836 38,323 0 160,825 6 2032 6,689,679 114,760 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.54% 79,071 40,301 38,770 0 162,440 7 2033 6,756,576 116,098 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.54% 79,993 40,771 39,222 0 164,071 8 2034 6,824,142 117,449 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.54% 80,924 41,245 39,679 0 165,719 9 2035 6,892,383 118,814 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.54% 81,864 41,725 40,140 0 167,382 10 2036 6,961,307 120,192 35.12% 33.78% 13.63% 82.54% 82,814 42,209 40,606 0 169,063 TOTAL = 742,655 378,515 364,140 0 3,326,212 Key Assumptions: 1 Taxable market value (TMV) annual growth assumption = 1.0% 2 Election for captured tax capacity is 100.00% 3 TMV includes 98-room hotel, with amenities, and 6,200 SF restaurant to be immediately adjacent/attached to hotel. Wright County Assessor estimates preliminary taxable market value for the project of $6,365,000 in today's (current) value. 4 Assumes project construction partially completed in 2025 for taxes first payable in 2027; and fully completed in 2026for taxes payable in 2028. 5 Tax rates equal Proposed Pay 2024Tax Rates for the respective taxing jurisdictions. Wright County has not published Final Pay 2024Tax Rates. Exhibit B City of Monticello, MN Monticello Hospitality Group, Hotel Development Developer Sources and Uses of Funds for Construction Sources of Funds First Mortgage Equity Total Sources of Funds Uses of Funds Land / building acquisition costs (not incl. FFE) Equipment / FFE Hard construction costs Misc. and Contingency Working capital Other soft construction costs Financing costs Development fee Total Uses of Funds Number of Hotel Rooms Notes: Total % of Total Average Per Hotel Room ($) 13, 837, 500 75.0% 141,199 4,612,500 25.0% 47,066 18, 450, 000 100.0% 188,265 1,000, 000 5.42% 10,204 2,550,000 12, 825, 000 69.51% 130,867 500,000 2.71% 5,102 200,000 1.08% 2,041 35,000 0.19% 357 500,000 2.71% 5,102 840,000 4.55% 8,571 18,450,000 86.18% 188,265 1. Use of funds includes cost of development both the hotel, including amenities and the restaurant. 9.1 Exhibit C City of Monticello, MN Monticello Hospitality Group, Hotel Development Preliminary Estimated Pro Forma Prepared by Northland Based on Information Submitted by Developer and Information Prepared by Northland Calendar Year 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Year of Tax Abatement District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gross Income (before Tax Abatement) 2,494,098 3,143,508 3,542,156 3,813,992 3,941,219 4,206,383 4,457,467 4,720,024 4,994,515 5,281,422 Less Expenses (1,366,439) (1,798,791) (1,994,957) (2,142,681) (2,213,434) (2,347,999) (2,486,391) (2,631,055) (2,782,242) (2,940,217) Net Operating Income (NOI) 1,127,659 1,344,716 1,547,199 1,671,311 1,727,784 1,858,383 1,971,076 2,088,969 2,212,272 2,341,205 Plus Tax Abatement Revenue (City and County) 30,741 75,474 76,360 77,255 78,158 79,071 79,993 80,924 81,864 82,814 NOI with Tax Abatement 1,158,400 1,420,191 1,623,559 1,748,566 1,805,943 1,937,455 2,051,068 2,169,893 2,294,137 2,424,019 Debt Service, Reserves, and Partnership 1,125,262 1,366,420 1,481,855 1,497,448 1,504,724 1,519,682 1,534,078 1,549,133 1,564,874 1,581,327 Management Fee Net Cash Flow with Tax Abatement Cash on cash with Tax Abatement (NOI / TDC) Cash on cash without Tax Abatement Cumulative YTD cash on cash with Tax Abatement Cumulative YTD cash on cash without Tax Abatement e, Debt coverage with Tax Abatement -Z Debt coverage without Tax Abatement K E� o O Notes: cv 1/ Total Development Cost (TDC): 2/Total Equity: 33,138 53,770 141,704 251,118 301,218 417,772 516,990 620,760 729,263 842,692 0.7% 1.2% 3.1% 5.4% 6.5% 9.1% 11.2% 13.5% 15.8% 18.3% 0.1% -0.5% 1.4% 3.8% 4.8% 7.3% 9.5% 11.7% 14.0% 16.5% 0.9% 1.7% 2.6% 3.4% 4.3% 5.3% 6.3% 7.456 8.5% -0.2% 0.3% 1.2% 1.9% 2.8% 3.8% 4.8% 5.8% 6.9% 1.05 1.11 1.27 1.36 1.41 1.51 1.60 1.69 1.79 1.89 1.02 1.05 1.21 1.30 1.35 1.45 1.54 1.63 1.73 1.83 18,450,000 4,612,500 Consideration of Tax Abatement Pre -Application from Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC. Created by: City of Monticello CITY Monti 0 eRo SECTION: FINANCE REFERENCE: Economic Development TITLE: TAX ABATEMENT POLICY City Policy and Procedure NO: FIN - Date: 10-23-2023 Next Review Date: TBD 1.0 Purpose Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended (the "Abatement Act"), provides the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") with the authority to grant tax abatements in certain instances. The City intends to provide tax abatement assistance ("Abatement") to: • Encourage desirable development or redevelopment in the City (each, a "Project") that would not occur but for the Abatement. • Leverage Abatement and other public dollars to maximize private sector investment in the City. 2.0 Policy Project Requirements To grant an Abatement for a Project, the City must find that (1) the benefits of the Project to the City will be equal to or greater than the cost of the Abatement; (2) the Project would not be feasible but -for the granting of the Abatement; (3) the Project is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Plan and Zoning Ordinances and the Abatement Act; and (4) the Project will serve the public interests of the City because it will: • Retain or create jobs that offer stable employment or living wages and benefits, • Enhance or diversify the City's economy based on a demonstrated need; • Provide transportation or public infrastructure improvements; • Remove blight and/or encourage high quality redevelopment of commercial and industrial areas through private investment; • Provide affordable housing; • Improve the quality of life of City residents by providing a desirable good or service. Ineligible Projects The City will not grant an Abatement for Projects where: • The sole public benefit of the Project is the preservation or increase of the City's tax base. • The Project is purely speculative (the Developer must demonstrate a market demand for the Project). • The Abatement would create an unfair and significant competitive financial advantage over other developments in the area. • The Project would place extraordinary demands on City services or would generate significant negative environmental impacts. Developer Requirements For the City to grant an Abatement for a Project, the developer of the Project (the "Developer") must: • Invest a reasonable amount of cash equity into the Project, as determined by the City. • Provide financial guarantees to ensure completion of the Project to the satisfaction of the City, including, but not limited to, letters of credit, personal guarantees, etc., unless an exception is granted by the City. • Demonstrate, to the City's sole satisfaction, an ability to complete the Project based on, among other things, past development experience and credit history, among other factors including the size and scope of the proposed project. • Demonstrate the benefits to the City, specifically how the Project meets the Project Requirements of this policy. • Provide any market, financial, environmental, or other data as the City or its consultants may reasonably request to analyze the Project and the need for the Abatement. • The Developer shall comply in all respects with the City's Business Subsidy Criteria and comply with all the Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.993 through 116J.995 (the "Business Subsidy Act"), if applicable. • The Developer shall be responsible for the payment of all costs of the City's consultants relating to the abatement, including but not limited to the fees of the City's municipal advisor and attorney. Abatement Funds Amount: The length and amount of the Abatement will be based on the Abatement Act and a specific Project's need as determined by the City. Source: The Abatement shall be garnered from City property taxes collected from the added tax base of the Project. Property taxes collected from the base value of the land or any current structures on the property will not be abated as part of any assistance granted under this Policy. Uses: When applicable, Abatement funds shall be prioritized in use to finance public improvements and City -supported design elements associated with the Project. Abatement funds may also be used to finance: • Legal, administrative, and engineering costs; • Site preparation, site improvement, land purchase*, demolition, and environmental remediation; and • Capitalized interest and bonding costs, if applicable. *Abatement shall not be provided to reimburse land purchases in excess of a property's fair market value. An appraisal by a third party, agreed upon by the City and Developer and paid for with Developer's escrow, will determine the fair market value of a property. MN 1 90\101 \900566.0 Pavments: Approved Abatements shall be provided to the Developer upon receipt of the Abatement by the City, otherwise referred to as the pay-as-you-go method. Abatement Approval Process: 1. Developer submits the completed application along with a nonrefundable initial application fee and escrow as established in the City's adopted ordinance for fee schedule. City staff reviews the application and completes the Application Review Worksheet (the "Worksheet"). 2. The Worksheet is submitted to City's Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") who reviews the Project and provides a recommendation on whether or not to grant the Abatement. 3. The Worksheet and the EDA's recommendation are submitted to the City Council for review. If preliminary approval of the Abatement is granted, the applicant submits the final application fee and escrow as established in the City's adopted ordinance for fee schedule. 4. If preliminary approval is granted, City staff works with its consultants to prepare the documents necessary to approve the Abatement, including but not limited to a tax abatement assistance agreement between the City and the Developer including a business subsidy agreement, if required by the Business Subsidy Act (the "Development Agreement"). 5. Public hearing notice(s) are published. 6. Public hearing(s) on the Abatement and, if necessary, the granting of a business subsidy as required by the Business Subsidy Act, are held. Please note that the City will not hold a public hearing on the Abatement until the Development Agreement is in final form and has been signed by the Developer. 7. The City Council grants final approval or denial of the Abatement and the Development Agreement, including a business subsidy agreement, if applicable. The City reserves the right to approve or reject Projects on a case -by -case basis, regardless of the EDA's recommendation, taking into consideration established policies, Project criteria, and potential demand on City services weighed against the potential Project benefits. Meeting the Project and Developer requirements detailed in this Tax Abatement Policy does not guarantee that a Project will be granted an Abatement. Approval or denial of one Project is not intended to set precedent for approval or denial of another Project. Further, the City Council may deviate from this Tax Abatement Policy for Projects that supersede the objectives identified herein, for which the public benefit shall be enumerated within the official findings for the Abatement. 3.0 Scope This policy applies to all projects that apply for and may receive tax abatement assistance pursuant to the Abatement Act. 4.0 Approval Date: Amendment Date: Amendment Date: 10-23-2023 HISTORY Approved by: City Council Approved by: Approved by: MN 190\ 101 \900566.0 City of Monticello Economic Development Authority Tax Abatement and TIF Development Project Ranking October 10, 2023 The scoring worksheet is to be used as a Guideline for weighing the merits of the use of EDA development tools such as incentive financing such as TIF or Tax Abatement. It is intended to be Guideline and should be applied to prospects in this manner. There may be instances where factors of a proposed development may warrant deviation from the Guidelines. It is the EDA's discretion to adhere to the Guidelines or deviate from them in the interest of furthering Economic Development Goals and Objectives in the City of Monticello as identified in by the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. There are several factors that are pertinent to proposed scoring. They are shown below with a Worksheet Summary at the conclusion. 1 Name of Project: FC?', r �� Q-\cL Ir r� U 1. Number of New Employees Point Value Number 1-5 6-15 16-30 31-50 51+ 2. Number of Jobs Per Acre Point Value Number Per Acre 1— 2 per acre 3 — 4 per acre 5 — 6 per acre 6 — 7 per acre 8 + per acre 3. Average Wages for New Jobs Point Value Pay Range +1 $15,000-24,999 +2 $25,000-29,999 +3 $30,000-44,999 +4 $45,000-59,999 +5 $60,000 + Dollar Weighting $20,000 $27,500 $37,500 $52,500 _,_) += $60,000 4. Public Assistance per New Jobs $ 31 t S Public Assistance 14Z. Number of new jobs created 2 Total Empl. Weighted $ Amt. 1 Point Value Public Assistance per new job Cat co � G.'o~ 1C.`"'A-C�' Public Dollars Invested Per New Job Over $50,000 $40,000 to $49,999 $30,000 to $39,999 $20,000 to $29,999 $0 to $19,999 r 5. Number of Years of TIF Assistance Needed (70— 9years 8 years +2 7 years or less 6. Developed Assessed Value Per Acre Point Value Value Per Acre +1 $150,000-199,999 +2 $200,000-349,999 +3 $350,000-499,999 +4 $500,000-599,999 QL_ $600,000 + 7. Business Retention Point Value Number of Retained Jobs +0.5 1-5 jobs +1 6-10 jobs +1.5 11-30 jobs +2 31-50 jobs +2.5 50-100 jobs +3 101 + jobs 3 S. Ratio of Private versus Public Investment in Proiect $ 1 46 1 2;�7) 383 5 Private Investment $ , 1 fi D�Wublic Investment -t- $ j q, 5V01 000 Total Investment 2 S �.o -1 Ratio of Private versus Public financing Point Value Ratio +1 over 2:1 +2 over 3:1 +3 over 4:1 +4 over 5:1 +5 �lo�gr ater 9. Significant Communitv Impact Point Value Unsubsidized Spin -Off development potential +1 Low potential for spin-off of unsubsidized development +2 Moderate potential for spin-off unsubsidized development +3 High potential for spin-off unsubsidized development 10. Tenure in Business Operation Point Value Number of Years in Business +1 Five years or less +2 6 to 10 years +3 11 years or more 4 11. Environmental Impacts Point Value +1 -1 -2 -3 Types of Environmental Issues Enhances the environmental aspects of a site via clean-up of contaminants or improved aesthetics via unique site or architectural features--'' No impacts Noise Issues Noise and negative visual aesthetics Noise, odors, dust, traffic and negative visual aesthetics WORKSHEET SUMMARY Factors Total Points #1. Number of New Employees 4— (1-5) #2. Number of Jobs Per Acre (1-5) #3. Average Wages for New Jobs (1-5) #4. Public Assistance Per New Job _� (1-5) #5. I'A o r' Number of Years of TIF Assistance (1-2) #6. Developed Assessed Value Per Acre -' (1-5) #7. Business Retention (# of Jobs) (.5-3) #8. Ratio of Private to Public Invest. _� (1-5) #9. Significant Impact/Comp Plan Goals 3 (1-3) #10. Number of Years of Business Oper. 3 (1-3) #11. Environmental Impacts (-3 to +1) 5 Total Points Total Possible Points = 42 5 �/,,,cerPt ,s Hotel Market Studv - Monticello, MN 20�3 14o+eJ 5t Recommended Facilities SECTION 6: RECOMMENDED FACILITIES This section of the report presents the facilities that are recommended for a hotel that will be most successful given the area market characteristics. Estimates of the utilization of the recommended hotel are presented in the next section of the report. HOTEL FACILIITY RECOMMENDATIONS Building both quality and amenities into a hotel adds cost and therefore, higher quality hotels with a restaurant and meeting space must charge higher room rates. Thus, the price sensitivity of a market must be assessed in order to determine the type of a hotel project that can be supported by the subject market. The full -service hotel has all but disappeared in recent years for locations other than urban areas, large office parks, and corporate centers. This is due to their higher cost (and higher room rates) relative to limited -service hotels that can offer the same quality room but at a lower rate. Due to the challenges of staffing and operating a restaurant, full -service hotels are also considered to be of greater risk by lenders and investors. Based on our evaluation of the local hotel supply and demand conditions we believe that an 80-room limited -service hotel of upper midscale quality will perform best within the Monticello competitive market. Guest Rooms The guest rooms should be finished with high quality floor and wall coverings and appropriately furnished. Bathrooms should be tiled and have granite counter- tops. Most of the bathrooms should have a walk-in shower, rather than a tub. Rooms should include smart televisions with at least one popular streaming service, a coffee maker, and free high-speed internet. We suggest the hotel's room complement should include some interconnecting rooms to better accommodate 51 Hospitality Consulting Group Hotel Market Studv — Monticello, MN Recommended Facilities family travelers. Four 1-bedroom suites are recommended to accommodate relocations, wedding parties and guests celebrating special occasions. At least one of the suites should offer full kitchen facilities suitable for long term stays. Meeting Facilities The hotel should include a public function room of approximately 1,000 square feet. A room of this size could accommodate 50 to 80 for a meeting, 50 for a banquet, and 100 for a reception. This amenity will allow the hotel to attract an additional demand segment made up of area meetings and social functions. Other Amenities Other amenities that are recommended for the hotel include: • An indoor pool that will improve the hotel's competitiveness for leisure travelers and for visitors to area residents; • An exercise room with several high -quality exercise machines and a television; • A business center with a computer and printer available to guests 24 hours a day; • Complimentary breakfast for guests; and • High speed wireless internet access throughout the hotel. Parking Adequate and convenient parking will be required for the success of the hotel. In order to meet local code requirements, we estimate that the hotel should have at least 100 parking spaces. Additional parking may be required to accommodate attendees at functions that are not staying at the hotel. Franchise Discussion There is an emerging trend within the hotel industry whereby guests select a hotel based on its company's rewards program, rather than on convenience of location, room rates or amenities. The large franchise companies award points 52 Hospitality Consulting Group Hotel Market Studv - Monticello, MN Recommended Facilities for staying in their hotels which can then be redeemed for free or discounted stays at any hotel within their respective chains. Thus, it is not unusual for travelers to drive an extra distance to stay at a hotel whose rewards program they participate in. This factor can distort the competitive environment within a particular hotel market. Marriott, Hilton, and Intercontinental Hotel Group have the most popular programs, as they have hotels throughout the world, including a number of popular resorts, where rewards can be redeemed. Choice Hotels has a liberal rewards program that provides free hotel rooms, but its inventory of hotels and resorts is not nearly as extensive as the three aforementioned hotel companies. Because these hotel brands are represented in nearby Albertville, Rogers and Maple Grove, we recommend that a hotel carrying a well -recognized national franchise should be considered for Monticello in order to achieve maximum market penetration. The stronger the subject hotel's franchise, the less business will be lost to these hotels in the surrounding markets. 53 Hospitality Consulting Group Hotel Market Studv — Monticello, MN Financial Proiections Financing Scenario The terms for hotel financing depend on the experience and financial strength of the developer and the operator. At the present time, conventional hotel loans are being made at 8.0 to 8.5 percent interest rate with the requirement of between 30 to 40 percent equity. For analysis purposes we have assumed an 8.0 percent in- terest rate and a 35 percent equity investment or $3,850,000, leaving a loan of $7,150,000 to provide funds for the $11,000,000 total project cost. Source of Funds: Equity Debt $3,850,000 35% 7,150.000 65% $11,000,000 100% Debt Term Assumptions: Annual Interest Rate: 8.0% Amortization: 20 years Annual Payment: $718,000 The results of this analysis are presented in the following table. Economic Feasibility Analysis Estimated Project Cost: $11,000,000 35% Equity, 65% Debt; 8% Interest 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Cash Flow Avail. for Debt Service $846,000 $853,000 $939,000 $989,000 $1,067,000 Debt Service $718,000 $718,000 $718,000 $718,000 $718,000 Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.18 1.19 1.31 1.38 1.49 Cash Flow to Equity $128,000 $135,000 $221,000 $271,000 $349,000 Equity $3,850,000 $3,850,000 $3,850,000 $3,850,000 $3,850,000 Return on Equity 3.3% 3.5% 5.7% 7.0% 9.1% A debt coverage ratio (cash flow/annual debt service) of a minimum of 1.2 times is required and 1.4 times is typically preferred by lenders. This analysis shows that the hotel is projected to generate sufficient cash flow to minimally meet its 71 Hospitality Consulting Group Hotel Market Studv - Monticello, MN Financial Proiections debt service requirements in the first two years, and will not produce a comfort- able debt coverage until its fourth year. Hotel investors typically like to see cash on cash returns of at least 10 percent. A hotel development company, who also would manage the hotel, may include the management fee in its investment decision and thus accept a lower return. In this simple analysis, the projected cash on cash return on equity only reaches 9 per- cent by the hotel's fifth year of operation. The project cost and terms of financing assumptions used in this analysis produces marginal debt coverage in the hotel's early years and does not pro- vide an acceptable return on investment until its fifth year. Therefore. we conclude that the hott,), nroiPct nay no P Prnnam Cally feasiblewithout some measures that either reduces its cost or the interest rate, or both. 72 Hospitality Consulting Group Jim Thares From: Sarah T. Kortmansky <skortmansky@northstarbank.com> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 1:32 PM To: Ted Christianson; Rob Thompson Subject: Follow-up Rob and Ted - Below is a summary of what we'd be looking to bring to our committee/ board for approval. Nex Steps would be receipt of construction and FF&E Budgets, guarantor financial review, including Cl and GNP. If you'd like a secure upload link, let me know. Thanks! - LTV not to exceed 75% of appraised value - Operating Account @ NSB - R&M - 5% Revenue after stabilization @ NSB - mos 1-12 I -only construction - mos 13-24 I -only stabilization - mos 25-36 I -only plus Principal of 25% of excess cash flow after Interest carry and reserve requirements, not to exceed what would be required under regular amortization - thereafter full P&I, Dividends not to exceed Cash Flow From Operations minus DS and Maintenance Reserve - Assume NW of guarantors in excess of $100m - Require 2X loan amount in verified guarantor liquidity (NOT PLEDGED) - Unlimited Guaranty of Cl and GNP until Stabilization - All other guarantees to be negotiated. - Current Interest Rate in the 7%'s, but TBD upon receipt of full package Work hard, do the right thing. —A- Sarah Kortmansky Market President LPO/DPO at 530 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362 North Star Bank - "Your Financial Partner' direct. 763.235.1135 cell: 952.358.0235 fax: 651.489.9541 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. From: Ted Christianson <ted.christianson@gnproperties.net> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 12:47 PM To: Sarah T. Kortmansky <skortmansky@northstarbank.com>; Rob Thompson <rob.thompson@Ciconstruction.com> Subject: RE: Marriot Hotel proforma - Monticello 1 W W ZDQ Q liOZ NAW� N W a !� doh€- dF�o3vezy N JWO_gOwFLL 8 }yam E $ Z _ O _ cc i W iy N OZOWSZ� Wmy — \� G at( VOUO2yZ � LL6~OF CELL W C N Om- L r_ WC Z OCiNa ovFi U -Z--_---__ -- d ON ®7`0�1 L U N ♦zoz rpWa» Ir Nia Ww ZNQ QO N c a m FKn w eoo i co p a O W aeZ g z (C O O ZOLLFWFJtlNTJa } >N OUoIN2F Wo �w0cd C� V, o C r Z Ny Zy�� G Q. N QQ Z r N_ �+�UQUrZ E LL: N N LL a I I I � I I ]] 0 0 I OHO OHO j{ u th sa tY' W WWW I u r - I a I p I j6Q; O I Q-� I p I I Q I Z I Q I � I J �I � I o I I I U � ---_JY III III III III II I II I IILU III III III Y — III I� III III �I I I rr �\ Irtrt` �Ih III �I IL---� � Ir===' �L +--= Jr-= I— _d 666 1}�F 7r===� �--_� r-- I J+ _ II Q 8 LL � 4 E ia L § Z©■ 6D� ` - - - - - - - m ) �/ CD 2�| 0 a m k = `CD 2 fI�&§§ §: ��° +DO M � | ;■= ` O § § o 2 $ cc` c � z © � 2 || § (0 00,0 � ul ■ |`5 t © v b k ` B E222[§§ r. Kkk§«/E &� 0 d |0d Do0 !§ ° z------------ - - - - - - § ! || ! k ? t & 2 » § j z = o ; § m =,g aw ) 6■(95 K!\\ 4 !| a�, &k`f �,`t0 �8b` �'w[ !k§ k° 0RZ k§1FE k /§/b\o)- &# §$ I \I Im � E 7 - - - - - - - - - - 5 & }/ CO 7 f ' N Os / § o 2 f @ @ �� 0 —k--------------\--- ! | � Z W I = YiI9/ Z W Zw0 d Q o _ U 0 �po N W C c N Q /: •Q% ' � m 8 1� i �iao5 N JW0,06 oZom� ae=9 $t £^�^' o z Z 0 0 F N O N cu C FOUWSWZ OC N U L Y t L1 0€ d jV OOZQ a GW IrOF �% �61L W w O ++ C Q go r0�i O OIJ�OOmci -�--_----_-- w ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS Listed below are the economic development goals which were i ormed by the Community Vision. For the complete set of policies and strategies for the goals refer to the Implementation Chapter. GOAL 1: BUSINESS ATTRACTION AND RETENTION r"K-A successful business attraction and retention program that attracts new businesses and retains existing businesses. GOAL 2: TAX BASE EXPANSION A stable and expanding tax base that diversities the city's economy and creates a sustainable employment to offset the eventual closure of the Xcel Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. GOAL 3: DOWNTOWN VITALITY A vibrant and thriving Downtown that contriIP heCity's economic development and housing objectives. GOAL 4: REDEVELOPMENT AND REINVESTMENT Redevelopment of vacant and underutilized parcels consistent with meeting the City's economic development, land use and community design objectives. GOAL 5: LIFE -CYCLE HOUSING Monticello will be a community with a wide variety of housing options that includes workforce, starter, step up, and senior housing to allow for new and existing residents to remain and age in the community. 'AMEW617 ffi"IT GOAL 6: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT A workforce development and training program that provides the skills and knowledge needed for a wide range of jobs and opportunities. GOAL 7: PROMOTION AND PARTNERSHIPS Collaborative Partnerships and the Promotion of Monticello Economic Development Projects, Programs and Activities. GOAL 8: OPPORTUNITY FOCUS AREAS 71 Reinvestment, redevelopment and overall improve nt of the opportunity focus areas within the City. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 131 THE POINTES AT CEDAR SMALL AREA PLAN NAC PLANNING wsB NORTHLAND PUBLIC FINANCE • 1 i I � I Is �* �• ��� '� �f I) ',7f:1'1�..�,�� '' ;�� �� J�h��ye�ii •i I �r �i ��,�`'�!��p� ' .r• �r (I ""� •�- �` �' � �., �j��1 I t � •�,v i1{li ul'^.+_�� t yt�.—`.�_� i� �.�t1�r� _� _ -- � . _ 1 Ap i I r THE POINTES AT CEDAR DESIGN GOALS A series of goals arose in response to the design challenges. They built on the early principles and evolved as new technical and policy information emerged. The following goals directly support the project vision and further guided ongoing design and policy work. • The Pointes at Cedar is a joint public -private venture. It is designed to enhance valuable commercial development potential and integrate a variety of residential opportunities surrounding a significant public space, including a usable water feature and a variety of upland spaces. • Residents, business owners, and employees may experience The Pointes at Cedar as a complete environment in which they can live, work, and recreate. The Pointes is also envisioned as a place that invites all members of the Monticello community and beyond to patronize its businesses and enjoy its open space features, both active and passive. • The Pointes at Cedar will present a distinct set of amenities within Monticello's larger park system, and the design will seek connectivity with the City's other assets. The Pointes at Cedar will also relate actively to the existing and future surrounding land use neighborhoods. • At the nearly 100-acre The Pointes at Cedar, a wide range of uses are supported and encouraged. Mixed use is most likely to be seen in the horizontal layout of interrelated uses, rather than vertical mixed -use buildings, although such buildings would be welcomed. In concept, The Pointes area anticipates commercial land uses to the west and north, transitioning to a mix of residential living environments to the east and south. • To achieve the vision of an exceptional development area, the City will consider higher intensity land usage in parts of the project than that commonly applied under the City's zoning or related ordinances, most often in conjunction with execution of desired amenities. Moreover, the higher intensity of land usage will have the beneficial effect of helping realize the feasibility of the amenities planned for the public spaces. • The Pointes at Cedar is envisioned to host a variety of housing: affordable options, modest -cost options, and luxury homes, in a variety of configurations of density, massing, and ownership. • To support the mixed -use neighborhood, desired commercial uses are those that promote high levels of employment and consist of or support hospitality and recreational uses. These include restaurants and entertainment venues. Due to the extensive exposure of the commercial buildings in The Pointes area, business building design and use will present a public face in all directions, with attention to architectural opportunities presented by the service portions of the buildings. • A unique transitional landscaping model reflecting Minnesota's biomes will guide the public and private spaces and their landscape design. Art, signage, architecture and other design elements are encouraged to reflect the biome construct. • Paramount will be the intention and ability to both value and take advantage of the public space investments that comprise the central focus of The Pointes at Cedar' design. PUBLIC MEETINGS & WORKSHOPS • October 21, 2019 —Joint City Council and Planning Commission Overview of The Pointes at Cedar Area & Concept Workshop • November 9, 2020 —City Council (Regular Meeting) Consideration of Authorization of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan • January 13, 2021 —Joint City Council and Economic Development Authority Small Area Plan Kick -Off Workshop • January 28, 2021 —Joint Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission Small Area Plan Kick -Off Workshop • March 8, 2021 —Joint City Council, Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Three Conceptual Layouts Design Workshop • April 28, 2021 - Joint City Council, Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission Site Tours — Maple Grove: Central Park, Edina: Centennial Lakes, Blaine: The Lakes • May 4, 2021 - Joint City Council, Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Preferred Concept, Standards and Naming Workshop • June 2, 2021 — Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Design & Vignettes • June 23, 2021—Joint City Council and Planning Commission The Pointes at Cedar Traffic Analysis Workshop • August 5, 2021 - Joint City Council, Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission and Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan Overview Workshop • September 23, 2021— Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan Adoption Recommendation — Comprehensive Plan Amendment • September 23, 2021— Planning Commission (Special Meeting) The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan Adoption Recommendation — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing • September 27 2021 - City Council (Regular Meeting) The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan Adoption — Comprehensive Plan Amendment * The Pointes at Cedar was selected as the final name of the project area in October 2021. 141Page Public and Private Space Intersection The intersection between public and private spaces will be critical within the project area. The expected density of development and use levels for the public portions of The Pointes area require thoughtful transition. With high intensity uses on both sides of the public -private boundary, conflicts can arise if these areas are not considered. In that regard, the basic design of the public space is intended to create a lake level and associated public pathway and other high -use spaces, which would be generally 8 to 10 feet below the finished floor elevation of the adjoining private land. This grade difference is envisioned to be supplemented with a combination of retaining walls and landscaping that creates a visual barrier between the paths and any first -floor residences, but which is also designed to retain views of the water surfaces from those residential buildings. By cutting the grade into the adjoining slopes, most residential views should extend over the paths to the water surface, while minimizing views of the land itself. As such, residential buildings should be able to design a reasonable level of privacy into their structures, while capitalizing on proximity to the public amenities. Private landscaping will augment the public installations to help create this separation. On the commercial side, it will be presumed that privacy is less of a factor, and that most business entities will choose a location in The Pointes at Cedar precisely for the exceptional exposure. To capitalize on this, the Plan envisions that many such business developments will utilize lower -level building space, in a "walk- out" fashion with primary access to Cedar Street above, and additional lower -level access to the public spaces below. PLAN EVOLUTION As the project design evolved, engagement with the property owners in the project area created a new opportunity. One of the primary landowners in the central portion of the study area indicated a willingness to convey his land to the City, rather than hold it further for development. As these discussions progressed, it was evident that certain elements of the layout could change to take better advantage of a revised ownership pattern. The most prominent of these was the location of the primary City park property — the "commons" of The Pointes at Cedar. In this initial scheme, the City park was located on current City -owned land along Cedar Street, north of Dundas. The primary driver of this location was the City's ownership, and an interest in maximizing private use of the then privately -owned property in the study area. With the City's pending purchase of the middle 35-acre area, relocating the City park area south of the self -storage facility along Cedar street created several new opportunities, including: • Relocating the created hill to the self -storage business boundary and utilizing that feature as a screening element between the public/private spaces and self -storage use; • Transferring the pavilion building to a place adjacent to the south bridge, at the junction of the central and south pools (see the biome discussions below); • Utilizing the powerline corridor that crosses the area for parking supply to serve both commercial uses south of the line and public uses north of the line — particularly as developed uses under the powerline are not feasible; • Relocating development opportunity from this south area north to the City's current 5-acre parcel with more prominent exposure and access; • Providing a commercial connection and "landing zone" for the Promenade pathway that leads from the Chelsea/Cedar Plaza into The Pointes area proper. In addition, the stormwater analysis yielded information on the depths and elevations required to achieve the desired lake effect. This required a different design strategy for incorporation of the previously constructed pond at Deephaven. The existing pond now becomes a feature of character reflecting the North pool's theme. The revised master plan takes advantage of these changes, reorienting the elements noted above, but retaining the primary biome organization from north to south. 241Page =10 `w r^ L b�iuur�imnrrt.� 0 251Page COMMERCIAL & PROFESSIONAL USES Density I Orientation I Relationship to Lake The Plan encourages commercial density within The Pointes at Cedar. The Plan anticipates that commercial uses will include those which maximize employment opportunity, as well as hospitality and recreational retail uses which take advantage of The Pointes' unique setting. Multi -story builds are encouraged, with high floor area ratios to increase commercial density. Similar to the residential uses, the Plan intends for commercial uses within the area to make the most of their access to the common amenities. Commercial uses should consider four-sided architecture where both street and lake frontages are present. Again, both physical and visual access to the lake will be a vital aspect of site and space planning. The City may consider reductions in overall parking requirements, flexibility on building setbacks or related site constraints and related improvements which further the goals of the project. The City will encourage pathway connections from and through the commercial properties, shared parking provisions and maintenance agreements. Shared parking and shared access conditions will be strongly encouraged to maximize commercial development density. On commercial properties, parking management plans will be a component of the development review. An aspect of this management plan will be to understand, and participate in, opportunities for cross -parking and public -use of those parking facilities in a way that will minimize interference with normal commercial parking demand. Wherever possible, commercial uses should utilize the public amenities to create outdoor dining, waterfront resting areas and connections to external parking and streets. Outdoor sales activities should be limited to festival and sidewalk sale -type events and spaces. 291Page UNIFYING DESIGN ELEMENTS & CONTRIBUTIONS PARKING AND SHARED/JOINT PARKING Vehicular parking is critical to successful business and residential communities, as well as maximizing the intensity of uses around the public areas. Attention to adequate and convenient parking will be examined closely as a factor in site planning review. It is emphasized, however, that overparking — particularly surface parking lots — will need to be minimized using shared parking areas wherever practicable. Extensive reliance on covered parking will be a requirement in residential projects and encouraged on commercial sites. Common parking areas that can be managed cooperatively are encouraged and will result in greater density allowances. In all areas, both residential and commercial, the City will seek underground, under - building, and/orshared structured parking to minimize the areas of the development properties devoted to automobile surface parking. For some, this will entail cross access and parking agreements (especially in the commercial zones), and in others, this will include flexibility as to parking design and investment in structured parking that fulfills these objectives. Sustainability measures, including electric vehicle charging stations, are further encouraged. CONSOLIDATED SIGNAGE The City will develop a signage system for The Pointes at Cedar, including identification and wayfinding. Private development in the district will be encouraged to incorporate elements of that system into its wayfinding and identification packages. This policy is not intended to create a single communication theme for all occupants of the district, and artistic variation is supported. However, particularly where private communication intersects with public uses or spaces, adherence to the City's design will be important. Signage throughout the area may incorporate signage elements specific to its biome. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND MATERIALS A diverse architectural environment is encouraged in The Pointes. The Plan anticipates that building and/or site development will draw from design themes reflective of the biome environment. Individual development design may choose other options but will be expected to respect the neighborhood in which it is located. However, it will be critical that all development, regardless of use, will incorporate high quality materials, creative architectural choices, and close attention to all aspects of the building and site being built upon. High quality building materials that consist significantly of masonry, glass, and similar materials are expected. In commercial development, lapped siding will be expected to be used in tightly limited exposures and primarily when designed to mimic wood finishes. Wall articulation, ornamental features, roofline variation, extensive window coverage, and four-sided architecture all are examples of the high expectations for development in the district. It is recommended that the City utilize PUD zoning to identify and encourage architectural character. Project design should be prepared to be reviewed as to its ability to conform to this expectation. ART Monticello is investing in a culture of creativity which encourages art in all forms — visual, literary, performance, and more. The integration of art throughout the public and private spaces of The Pointes at Cedar will enhance the central amenities and experience of all who live, work, and visit. Art will encourage exploration and enrich the space. Consistent with its other public improvement and park projects, the City will seek to incorporate art into both the built and programmed The Pointes at Cedar environment. LIGHTING The City will establish a common public lighting plan and design for The Pointes at Cedar. The plan will incorporate potential opportunities for unique branding of the area, but also with attention to existing lighting used in nearby areas. Lighting will include both pedestrian and general surface scale conditions. Private lighting is encouraged to reflect the styles and themes used in the public realm. Because The Pointes at Cedar is a mixed -use area of higher intensity land uses, attention must be paid to respecting adjoining land uses with the control of glare, light spread, and ambient light, balancing that with safety and need. ENTRY PLAZA Access to The Pointes land uses may occur from several points of entry surrounding the project area. In addition, the City plans an Entry Plaza at the corner of Cedar Street and Chelsea Road, creating a visual announcement of the district, along with access to its pedestrian and bicycle visitors. The plaza will serve as an initial gathering space, as well as a prominent wayfinding marker for passers-by on these two major roadways. Elements of the Entry Plaza may be mirrored in other entry points, as well as used as common thematic aspects of other public and private improvements. The plan of the Entry Plaza should introduce, and then allow repetition of, the public spaces that comprise the district, to avoid the appearance of private -only improvements. LANDSCAPING Both public and private landscaping elements are expected to reflect the biome model for The Pointes at Cedar. Landscaping is discussed in detail on page 33 through 38. 30 1 Page DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 MONTICELLO HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT AND LETTER OF INVESTMENT INTENT This CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT AND LETTER OF INVESTMENT INTENT (this "Agreement") is entered into on December 5th 2023, between Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Company"), and Deephaven Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Contributor"). 1. Agreement of Sale. The Company agrees to sell to Contributor, and Contributor agrees to purchase from the Company, 20 Series A units of limited liability company membership interests (the "Units") in exchange for the contribution of the following described real property ("Property"): Legal Description: Lots Three (3), and Four (4) of Block 1 of Deephaven 3, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. (See Attached Exhibit A) Tax Parcel #: 155265000010 The Property is intended to include approximately 2 acres of real property located within lots 3 & 4 of the official plat of Deephaven 3 to be determined by the final survey. The parties agree that the fair market value of the Property is $1,000,000.00. 2. Contribution of Property. 2.1 Closing Date. The contribution of the Property to the Company shall take place as of May 1, 2023, which for purposes of this Agreement may be referred to as the "Closing" or "Closing Date". In the event that the Company has not closed on the property by the abovementioned date the Contributor shall have the right to cancel the contract with no further obligation to the Company. 2.2 Contingency The location of the approximately 2 acres within Lots 3 & 4 shall be subject to mutual agreement between the Company and the Contributor. In the event that mutual agreement cannot be reached within a "reasonable" amount of time the Contributor shall have the right to cancel the agreement without any further obligation. For the purpose of this agreement reasonable amount of time shall be defined as 5 days following the Company presenting the Contributor with the proposed location. The Contributors obligation to close the transaction contemplated by this agreement is contingent upon Marriotts approval of an +/-80 room hotel. 2.3 Warranty Deed, Title, Liens & Encumbrances. As of the Closing Date, Contributor shall transfer title of the Property to Company by a Warranty Deed DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 conveying good and marketable title to Company in consideration of and payment for the Units. The transfer by Warranty Deed shall be free of all liens and encumbrances except for the following; (a) Building and zoning laws, subdivision laws, ordinances, state and federal regulations, provided they do not adversely affect Company's intended use of the Property. (b) Conditions, covenants, restrictions, declarations, and easements of record, if any, without effective forfeiture provisions and which do not interfere with present improvements and with Company's intended use of the Property. 2.4 Title Examination. Contributor shall finnish Company a title insurance commitment to the Property showing good and marketable title in Contributor, including legal access, ingress and egress to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except as noted above. After receipt of the last of the title insurance commitment and survey, if any, Company shall have 15 days to examine said title insurance commitment and within said period of time shall promptly notify Contributor of all objections thereto in writing. If Company notifies Contributor of any objections to matters disclosed in the title commitment, Contributor shall have a period of 90 days in which to cure Company's objections. If Contributor is unable or unwilling to cure Company's objections within said period of time or such further time as may be granted by Company, Company shall be entitled to either (a) terminate this Agreement by notice to Contributor (b) waive the uncured objections. Contributor shall in all events be obligated to discharge all mortgage liens and other liens on or before the closing date. 2.5 Real Estate Taxes and Assessments. Contributor agrees to pay all real estate taxes and assessments for special improvements, which are due and payable in the year prior to closing. Real estate taxes and assessments for special improvements due and payable in the year of closing shall be prorated between Company and Contributor on the basis of the real estate taxes and assessments for special improvements due and payable in the year of closing, and in the event the exact amount of the taxes and assessments due and payable in the year of closing are not yet known, the amount to be prorated shall be based on the real estate taxes and assessments for special improvements due and payable in the year prior to closing. Company agrees to pay the real estate taxes and assessments for special improvements due and payable in all years subsequent to closing. 2.6 Documents for Closing. Contributor shall furnish the following documents at the time of closing; a. Warranty Deed. b. Any Certificate of Real Estate Value or Fair Consideration required by the applicable state agencies. DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 Any documents required by the Company's title examination that are necessary to convey title consistent with this Agreement. d. An affidavit in a form presented by Company or by a title insurance company evidencing the absence of bankruptcies, judgments, tax liens, construction or mechanic's lien rights affecting the Property, unrecorded interests affecting the Property, persons in possession of the Property and known encroachments or boundary line questions affecting the Property. All appropriate Federal Income Tax Reporting Forms. f. All appropriate disclosures and certificates regarding wells, septic/sewer systems, ground water, environmental conditions or other conditions of the Property which certificates are required by the state where the Property is located. g. All abstracts of title for the Property. It. A non -foreign affidavit containing such information as is required under Section 1445(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code and any regulations relating thereto. i. Any other document required by this Agreement. In addition, each party will deliver to the other party and any title company that may be involved such agreements, assignments, conveyances, instruments, documents, certificates and the like as may be reasonably required by either party or the Title Company to consummate the sale of the Property from Contributor to Company in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 2.7 Allocation of Closing Expenses. The parties shall apportion the closing expenses in the following manner: Contributor's expenses - Contributor shall be responsible for: i. Any deed tax connected with the recording of the Warranty Deed. ii. The recording fees for any corrective instruments. iii. Its own attorney's fees. iv. Any cost connected with the cost of the title insurance commitment, or the preparation of any corrective documents. V. The preparation costs of any documents that Contributor is required to deliver to Company at or before closing. vi. One-half the cost of the closing fee charged by the title company. DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 b. Company's expenses - Company shall be responsible for: i. Recording fees for the Deed. ii. Its own attorney's fees, including fees for title opinions. iii. The cost of owner's or lender's title insurance premiums. iv. The preparation costs of any documents that Company is required to deliver to Contributor at or before closing. V. One-half the cost of the closing fee charged by the title company. vi. All other costs specifically allocated to Company as set forth in this Agreement. vii. Survey costs, UCC Searches, inspection fees, lender fees, appraisals, and environmental site assessments if ordered or required by Company. 3. Representations and Warranties of Contributor. In consideration of the Company's offer to sell the Units, Contributor hereby represents and warrants to the Company as follows: 3.1 Access to Information. Contributor has been given access to full and complete information regarding the Company, including but not limited to the Company's Operating Agreement, as amended to date (the "Control Agreement"), and has utilized such access to Contributor's satisfaction for the purpose of obtaining information regarding the Company, and, particularly, Contributor has met with or been given reasonable opportunity to meet with representatives of the Company for the purpose of obtaining all information concerning the Company that Contributor deems necessary to make an informed investment decision. 3.2 Company's Business Plan. Contributor understands that any business plan or similar document which Contributor may have been shown or of which Contributor may have been furnished a copy, is not a prospectus, placement memorandum, offering circular, offering statement, or similar document. Any such document was not prepared, and Contributor understands that any such document was not prepared with the purpose of providing full and accurate disclosure to investors. Contributor understands that any such document has been furnished to Contributor only as part of an overall furnishing of information about the Company and that Contributor has viewed the information set forth in any such document with a critical frame of mind and, to the extent that information contained in any such document was deemed by Contributor to be important information in malting an investment decision, Contributor has discussed such information with the officers and other personnel of the Company in order to form a better judgment regarding the accuracy and adequacy of such information. Contributor agrees that no statement in any document, even if framed as a factual statement, will, of itself, DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 constitute a factual representation by the Company in light of the various purposes for which any such document may have been created. 3.3 Financial Position. Contributor is in a financial position to hold the Units for an indefinite period of time and is able to bear the economic risk and withstand a complete loss of Contributor's investment in the Units. 3.4 Knowledge and Experience. Contributor, either alone or with the assistance of Contributor's own professional advisors has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that Contributor is capable of reading and interpreting financial statements and evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment in the Units. 3.5 Professional Investment Advice. Contributor has obtained, to the extent Contributor deems necessary, professional investment advice with respect to the risks inherent in an investment in the Units, and the suitability of an investment in the Units in light of Contributor's financial condition and investment needs. 3.6 Suitability of Investment. Contributor believes that the investment in the Units is suitable for Contributor based upon Contributor's investment objectives and financial needs, and Contributor has adequate means for providing for Contributor's current financial needs and personal contingencies and has no need for liquidity of investment with respect to the Units. 3.7 Risk of Investment. Contributor recognizes that an investment in the Units is highly speculative and involves a high degree of risk, including, but not limited to, the risk of economic losses from operations of the Company and the loss of Contributor's entire investment in the Company. 3.8 Value of Units. The contributor understands that the Company makes no assurances whatsoever concerning the present or prospective value of the Units. 3.9 Restrictions on Units. Contributor understands that (i) there are substantial restrictions on the transfer of the Units, (ii) there is not currently, and it is unlikely that in the future there will exist, a public market for the Units, and (iii) accordingly, for the above and other reasons, Contributor may not be able to liquidate an investment in the Units for an indefinite period. 3.10 Tax Matters. Contributor acknowledges that the Company is a limited liability company which has elected to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal tax purposes and that such election could result in personal tax liability to an investor in the Company even though no funds are distributed by the Company. 3.11 Backup Withholding. Contributor certifies, under penalties of perjury, that the undersigned is NOT subject to the backup withholding provisions of Section 3406(a)(i)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. (Note: You are subject to backup withholding if (i) you fail to fitrnish your Social Security number or taxpayer identification number in this Agreement,: (ii) the Internal Revenue DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 Service notifies the Company that you fiu°nished an incorrect Social Security number or taxpayer identification number, (iii) you are notified that you are subject to backup withholding, or (iv) you fail to certify that you are not subject to backup withholding or you fail to certify your Social Security number or taxpayer identification number). 3.12 Investment Intent. The Units are being acquired for Contributor's own account and for investment and without the intention of reselling or redistributing the Units, Contributor has made no agreement with others regarding the Units, and Contributor's financial condition is such that it is not likely that it will be necessary to dispose of the Units in the foreseeable future. 3.13 Residency or Principal Place of Business. If Contributor is a natural person, Contributor is a bona fide resident of, and is domiciled in and received the offer and made the decision to invest in the Units in, the State of (state where Contributor resides, if Contributor is an individual. If Contributor is an entity, Contributor is organized and has its principal place of business in, and received the offer and made the decision to invest in the Units, in the State of Minnesota (state where Contributor is organized/incorporated, if Contributor is an enti 3.14 Entity Contributors. If an entity, Contributor was not formed for the purpose of investing in the Units. 3.15 Status as an "Accredited investor". Contributor is (check ALL that apply — Contributor must be an accredited investor to acquire the Units): (a) Contributor is a natural person whose individual net worth or joint net worth with Contributor spouse, at the time of investment, exceeds $1,000,000. For the purposes of calculating net worth: With respect to assets, do not include your primary residence, and With respect to liabilities, do not include any mortgages on your primary residence except: o Include any debt that you incurred within the last 60 days that is secured by your primary residence (unless you incurred such debt in acquiring your primary residence), and o Include any amount (other than amounts included above) by which any debt secured by your primary residence exceeds the fair market value of such residence. (b) A natural person whose individual income was in excess of $200,000, or whose joint income with his or her spouse was in excess of $300,000, in each of the two most recent years, and who has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level for the current year. DocuSlgn Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 (c) A governor or an executive officer/manager of the Company. (d) A bank, insurance company, registered investment company, business development company, small business investment company or employee benefit plan. (e) A savings and loan association, credit union, or similar financial institution, or a registered broker or dealer. (f) A private business development company. (g) An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code with assets in excess of $5,000,000. (h) A corporation, limited liability company, Massachusetts or similar business trust, or partnership with assets in excess of $5,000,000. (i) A trust with assets in excess of $5,000,000. 0) An entity in which all of the equity owners are accredited investors. Also check the item(s) (a)-(j) that applies. (This itein is not available to an irrevocable trust). (k) A self -directed IRA, Keogh, or similar plan of which the individual directing the investments qualifies as an "accredited investor" under one or more of items (a)-O), above. Also check the item(s) (a)-O) that applies. (1) A revocable trust for the benefit of the grantor and/or the grantor's family members, whose grantor qualifies as an "accredited investor" under one or more of items (a)-O), above. Also check the item(s) (a)-O) that applies. (m) Contributor is NOT an accredited investor. 3.16 Units Subject to Control Agreement. Contributor understands that all Units will be subject to the Control Agreement (which includes substantial limitations on the transferability of units), and agrees to become a party to the Control Agreement, if not already a party to the Control Agreement. 3.17 Contributor a Party to Control Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in paragraph 2.1 regarding closing date, Contributor is deemed to have become bound by, and a signatory to, the Control Agreement. Contributor understands and agrees that the Units are subject to the terms and conditions of the Control Agreement. DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 3.18 Notice of Member Meetings. Upon the execution and delivery of this Agreement, Contributor is deemed to have agreed and consented to receiving notice of member meetings by any means of electronic communication permitted by the Minnesota Limited Liability Company Act, including electronic mail or facsimile at the email address or fax number listed on the contributor information page of this Agreement. Contributor agrees and understands that the foregoing consent is valid and in full force and effect until revoked by Contributor in writing. Any such revocation should be sent to the attention of Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC, Manager, at the following address: 1910 42nd Avenue West, Suite 300, Alexandria, Minnesota 56308. 3.19 Company's Legal Counsel. That (i) the Company has engaged legal counsel to represent the Company in connection with the offer and sale of securities contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) legal counsel engaged by the Company does not represent Contributor or Contributor's interests, and (iii) Contributor is not relying on legal counsel engaged by the Company. Contributor has had the opportunity to engage, and obtain advice fiom, Contributor's own legal counsel with respect to the investment contemplated by this Agreement. 3.20 Forward -Looking Statements. Contributor understands that any information provided in forward -looking statements about the Company's future plans and prospects is uncertain and subject to all of the uncertainties inherent in future predictions, and is not relying on any of the Company's financial projections or forward -looking statements in malting an investment decision to purchase the Units. 3.21 General Solicitation or Advertising. Contributor is not purchasing the Units as the result of any general solicitation or general advertising, including, but not limited to any advertisement, article, notice or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine or similar media or broadcast over television or radio or any seminar or meeting whose attendees have been invited by any general solicitation or general advertising. 3.22 Company's Right to Reject All or Part of Contribution. Contributor understands that the Company is free to reject any contribution in whole and if the Company determines to reject this contribution, any funds returned to the undersigned will be without deduction from the funds or interest on the funds. 3.23 Indemnification. Contributor agrees to indemnify the Company, and each current and future officer, board member, employee, agent and owner of the Company, against and to hold them harmless from any damage, loss, liability, claim or expense including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees resulting from or arising out of the inaccuracy or alleged inaccuracy of any of the representations, warranties or statements of Contributor contained in this Agreement. 4. Investment Purpose in Acquiring the Units. Contributor and the Company acknowledge that the Units have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 "Act"), or applicable state securities laws and that the Units will be issued to Contributor in reliance on exemptions from the registration requirements of the Act and applicable state securities laws and in reliance on Contributor's representations and agreements contained in this Agreement. Contributor is subscribing to acquire, and making a contribution for, the Units for the account of Contributor for investment purposes only and not with a view to their resale or distribution. Contributor has no present intention to divide Contributor s participation with others or to resell or otherwise dispose of all or any part of the Units. In making these representations, Contributor understands that, in the view of the Securities and Exchange Commission, exemption of the Units from the registration requirements of the Act would not be available if, notwithstanding the representations of Contributor, Contributor has in mind merely acquiring the Units for resale upon the occurrence or nonoccurrence of some predetermined event including, but not limited to, an intent to resell by reason of any foreseeable specific contingency or anticipated change in market values, or any change in the condition of the Company, or in connection with a contemplated liquidation or settlement of any loan obtained for the acquisition of the Units and for which the Units were pledged, any of which would represent an intent inconsistent with the representations set forth in this Agreement. 5. Compliance with Securities Act; Lock -up Restriction. 5.1 Transfer Restrictions. Contributor agrees that if the Units or any part of the Units are sold or distributed in the future, Contributor may sell or distribute them only pursuant to the requirements of the Act and applicable state securities laws. Contributor agrees that Contributor will not transfer any part of the Units without (i) obtaining an opinion of counsel satisfactory in form and substance to legal counsel for the Company to the effect that such transfer is exempt from the registration requirements under the Act and applicable state securities laws or (ii) such registration. 5.2 Lock -up Restriction. If the Company or any successor entity of the Company determines to complete an initial public offering of its securities, during the period of duration (not to exceed 180 days or such lessor time period that the directors and officers of the Company or its successor entity are subject to a similar restriction) specified by the Company (or its successor entity) and an underwriter of the securities of the Company (or its successor entity) following the effective date of the registration statement of the Company (or its successor entity) in comnection with an initial public offering of its securities to the general public, the undersigned will not, without the prior written consent of the managing underwriter, directly or indirectly, sell, offer to sell, contract to sell (including, without limitation, any short sale), grant any option to purchase or otherwise transfer or dispose of its Units or any securities issuable upon conversion of the Units (the "Lock -up Restriction"). In order to enforce the Lock -up Restriction, the Company or its successor entity may impose stop -transfer instructions with respect to the Units or the securities issuable upon conversion of the Units until the end of such period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the undersigned will only be subject to the Lock -up Restriction if each of the officers and directors of the Company or its successor entity, as the case may be, are subject to a similar Lock -up Restriction of equal or greater duration. DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 6. Restrictive Legend. Contributor agrees that Company may place a restrictive legend on the instrument representing the Units (if any) containing substantially the following language: "The securities represented by this document have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), have not been registered under any state securities laws. They may not be sold, offered for sale, or transferred in the absence of either an effective registration under the Act, and under the applicable state securities laws, or an opinion of counsel for the Company that such transaction is exempt from registration under the Act, and under the applicable state securities laws." "The Units are subject to, and are transferable only upon the terms and conditions of that certain Operating Agreement as the same may be amended from time to time, among the Members of the Company. A copy of said Agreement is on file with the Company. Any attempted transfer of these Units other than in accordance with said Agreement, whether by or pursuant to a gift, sale, pledge, or otherwise, and whether voluntarily or involuntarily, is void and of no effect." The contributor understands that the Company does not intend to, and has no obligation to, issue any certificates or other instrument representing ownership of the Units. 7. Knowledge of Transfer Restrictions on the Units. Contributor understands that the Units are not freely transferable and may in fact be prohibited from sale for an extended period of time and that, as a consequence of these restrictions, the undersigned must bear the economic risk of investment in the Units for an indefinite period of time and may have extremely limited opportunities to dispose of them. Contributor understands that Rule 144 under the Act permits the transfer of "restricted securities" of the type here involved only under certain conditions, including a minimum one-year holding period and the availability to the public of certain information concerning the Company, and that such conditions permitting sale may never occur. Additionally, all Units will be subject to the Company's Control Agreement. 8. Binding Effect; Termination. Neither this Agreement nor any interest in this Agreement will be assignable by Contributor without the prior written consent of the Company. The provisions of this Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement, and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. 9. Representations to Survive Delivery; Additional Information. The representations, warranties, and agreements of Contributor contained in this Agreement will remain operative and in full force and effect and will survive the contribution of all or any part of Property pursuant to Section 2 above. Contributor agrees to furnish to the Company, upon request, such additional information as may be deemed necessary to determine the undersigned's suitability as an investor. DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 10, Governing Law, Choice of Venue, Waiver of Jury Trial. Notwithstanding the fact that the Company may conduct business in states other than the State of Minnesota, and notwithstanding the fact that some or all of the Members may be residents of states other than Minnesota, this Agreement and the rights of the parties under this Agreement will be governed by, interpreted, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without regard to conflict of laws principles or provisions. Any action or proceeding against any of the parties to this Agreement relating in any way to this Agreement or the subject matter of this Agreement will be brought and enforced exclusively in the competent state or federal courts of Minnesota, and the parties to this Agreement consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in respect of such action or proceeding. The parties waive their right to a trial by jury for any action or proceeding seeking to enforce any provision of, or based on any right arising out of, this Agreement, whether grounded in tort, contract or otherwise. [Sigiiattire page follows] DocuSign Envelope ID: FDJDA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 Signature Page to Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC Contribution Agreement and Letter of Investment Intent 12/6/2023 Dated: , 20 no�ra��,,�Contributor(s): l�t.av�. L�uc�.lA.o(�y r NwgHJv r ouG r w�cs.,. Contributor, (Signature) Contributor (Signature, if more than one investor) Marls Buchholz Print Name Print Name (If more than one investor) 4379 33rd Ave S, Suite 121. Far;?o. ND 58104 Address Entity Contributors: Deephaven Development LLC Name of Entity Typ AW By:Mark Buchholz � rH4dr1JV I JlGI Yl.ly... Its: Managing Partner 3010 Sheyenne River Way West Fargo, ND 58078 Address The Company hereby accepts the contribution evidenced by this Agreement to be effective as of 1216/2023 ,20 MONTICELLO HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC BY G NEIGHB ROP RTIES, LLC, ITS A ER: By Te Christianson, Manager By: `. Ro ert Thompson, Manager DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 CONTRIBUTOR INFORMATION Deephaven Development, LLC (Please print exact legal naine(s) in which the Units are to be issued) 04-3509416 Taxpayer I.D. No. 4379 33rd Ave S. Suite 121 Address City: Fargo Taxpayer I.D. No. (If more than one investor) State:ND Telephone Number: ( 701_) 371-1646 Fax Number: ( i Email Address: mark@buchprop.com Check One: Individual Ownership Joint Tenants (JTWROS) Tenants in Common Partnership* Qualified Retirement Account*# Zip Code: 58104 X_LLC * Corporation* Revocable Trust* Irrevocable Trust* Other* *If checked, complete the attached Certificate of Signatory. #For Purchases in a Qualified Retirement Account, i.e., IRA (please initial in the blank space provided below). Purchasinia in a Retirement Account. An investment in a private placement of securities is HIGHLY SPECULATIVE in nature. Accordingly, such an investment may not be appropriate for Individual Retirement Accounts or other retirement -type accounts that carry conservative investment objectives. If this investment is, in fact, purchased in a retirement -type account, the undersigned hereby represents and affirms that the undersigned understands the risks of the investment and has decided that such risks are consistent with the undersigned's investment objectives for such account. DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 CERTIFICATE OF SIGNATORY (To be completed if Units are being subscribed for by an Entity) I, Mark Buchholz am the of Deephaven Development, LLC Omratina Partner (the `Entity"). I certify that I am empowered and duly authorized by the Entity to execute and carry out the terms of the Contribution Agreement and Letter of Investment Intent and to purchase and hold the Units, and certify further that the Contribution Agreement and Letter of Investment Intent has been duly and validly executed on behalf of the Entity and constitutes a legal and binding obligation of the Entity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand this December 2023. EDocu�S-ignedvby�:� 7 44BA34767"1 s3... (Signature) Operating Partner (Title) Mark Buchholz (Please Print Name) 6_ day of DocuSign Envelope ID: FD1DA901-6B5F-4C3E-A7C0-EB007B1F6A59 Execution Com MONTICELLO HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC SIGNATURE PAGE AND CONSENT TO BE BOUND BY OPERATING AGREEMENT This Signature Page and Consent to be Bound by Operating Agreement by the undersigned in connection with the undersigned's investment in Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Company"). The undersigned hereby agrees to be subject to all terms and conditions of that certain Operating Agreement among the members of the Company, and as the same may be amended from time to time (the "Agreement"). Upon acceptance of the undersigned's Contribution Agreement and Letter of Investment Intent by the Company, the undersigned will be deemed to be a "Member" as set forth in the Agreement. With the exception of the addition of the undersigned as an additional party, all other provisions of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect. Date: 12/06/23 Member Name: _Mark Buchholz �DocuSigned by: (Print) By: I v�ne{a' m "(/ (Signature) Its: (if an entity) Deephaven Development, LLC 16 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TAX ABATEMENT CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council (the "City Council") of City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") will meet at or after 6:30 p.m. on Monday, July 22, 2024, in the Mississippi Room of the City Community Center, located at 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, Minnesota, to conduct a public hearing to consider granting a property tax abatement under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended, for all or a portion of the City's share of property taxes for certain property located in the City (the "Property") to be developed by Monticello Hospitality Group, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, or an affiliate thereof or entity related thereto (the "Developer"). The Developer proposes to acquire the Property and construct and equip thereon an approximately 98-room hotel development with a 130-seat restaurant, an indoor pool, meeting space and related parking and amenities (the "Project"). The proposed abatement constitutes a business subsidy under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 1161993 to 116J.995, as amended (the "Business Subsidy Act"), and the City will also hold a public hearing on the proposed business subsidy and a business subsidy agreement with the Developer. The Property is located on Chelsea Road in the City and is identified as parcel identification number 155278001040 and 155278001030. Following the public hearing, the City Council will consider a resolution granting an abatement of all or a portion of the City's share of property taxes on the Property for a period of up to ten (10) years. The City proposes collecting the abatements over 10 years for an estimated total amount of approximately $378,515. At the time and place fixed for the public hearing, the City Council will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the Project and the proposed abatements. In addition, interested persons may direct any questions or file written comments regarding the Project and the proposed abatements with the City Administrator at or prior to said public hearing. A summary of the terms of the proposed business subsidy to be provided to the Developer to assist in developing the Project is available for inspection at City Hall during regular business hours. Any person with a residence in the City or who is the owner of taxable property in the City may file a written complaint with the City if the City fails to comply with the Business Subsidy Act. No action may be filed against the City for the failure to comply unless a written complaint is filed. Dated: July 11, 2024 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA /s/ Rachel Leonard City Administrator City of Monticello, Minnesota