Parks Commission Agenda Packet 03-26-2009AGENDA
PARKS COMMISSION
March 26, 2009 - 4:30 p.m.
"To enhance community pride through developing and
maintaining city parks with a high standard ojquality. "
1. Call to Order.
lA. Introduction of Steve Reishus, Parks Commission applicant.
2. Approve Minutes of January 22, 2009 Parks Commission Meeting
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
4. Citizens requests and comments.
5. Discussion of possibility of reducing number of Parks Commission meetings.
6. 2009 Budget/Financial Reporting Forms.
7. Financial report for 2008 on ballfield operations.
8. Discussion of 2009 park projects.
9. Appointment of Monticello Park Board representative to Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory
Council.
10. Bertram Chain of Lakes Day on June 13, 2009.
11. Dog Park Background Information. (Information sent out with February agenda)
12. Discussion on Water Tower Park
13. Maintenance
14. Change of meeting location for Parks Commission meetings.
15. Discussion with Steve Reishus on his interest in serving on the Parks Commission.
16. Adjourn.
NOTE: It is possible that Steve Grittman, City Planner and/or Angela Schumann, Community
Development Director will be present at the meeting to review with the Parks Commission changes in
State statues regulating park dedication fees. If scheduling does not allow them to be present at this
meeting it will be added to the next Parks Commission meeting.
1
Park Commission Minutes: January 22, 2009
MINUTES
PARKS COMMISSION
Thursday,
January 22, 2009 - 4:30 p.m.
"To enhance community pride through developing maintaining
City parks with a high standard of quality."
Members Present: Gene Emanuel, Nancy McCaffrey, Larry Nolan and Rick Traver and Council
Liaison Brian Stumpf
Members Absent: Mark Larson
Others Present: Tom Pawelk, Park Superintendent, Christopher Hadfield.
1. Call to Order.
Chair Larry Nolan called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. and declared a quorum
present.
Christopher Hadfield an applicant for the vacant position on the Parks Commission
was introduced to the commission members.
2. Update on YMCA Acquisition.
Park Superintendent Tom Pawelk supplied the Park Commission with a summary of the latest
meeting of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Task Force. Larry Nolan felt the Parks Commission has
to be actively involved in the planning for the YMCA Park. It was explained that the Task Force
will be establishing and defining the role of the governing body for this joint venture between the
City and Wright County. As the park plans move forward the Wright County Parks Department
and the Monticello Parks Commission will then become more involved in the planning process.
Tom Pawelk indicated that there would be at least two members from the Parks Commission and
two members from Wright County Parks in the planning group along with Council
representatives, County officials and citizens.
Tom Pawelk explained that while long term planning for the area has not commenced there are
some items that they intend to do this year which include constructing a bridge, trail maintenance
and signing. The bridge will be located just off 90th Street and will be either an iron structure or
constructed from segments of concrete pipe that the Public Works Department currently has.
The signing will be yellow signs identifying the area as the Bertram Chain of Lakes and
specifying that Wright County ordinances will be enforced. Tom Pawelk informed the Parks
Commission that the agreement with the YMCA would still allow the motorcycle club to have
their annual race on the site in May. Since this is a money making event there is a possibility
that there maybe some kind of arrangement to allow this event to continue beyond this year.
Eventually the public access to Bertram Lake will be located on the north side of Bertram Lake.
At the present time the access is on the southerly end of the lake. The Bertram Chain of Lakes
Task Force has requested that Jeff O'Neill meet with Brian Kirk of the YMCA regarding
opening of the access on the side of the lake where the chalet is located on a temporary basis for
1
Park Commission Minutes: January 22, 2009
weekend use. If this happens the hours of use would be the hours allowed by Wright County
park ordinances. The goal of the Task Force is to get public access to Bertram Lake as soon as
possible.
Gene Emanuel spoke to the need to start early planning for the ballfield development. Tom
Pawelk responded that much of 2009 will be spent on planning for the ballfields. Jeff O'Neill
stated that the Task Force wants to be frugal with the planning effort and thus limit the use of
outside consultants. This means those working in the planning effort will be doing much of the
research and study work. The Task Force wants the park development to be community driven
rather than planned based on recommendations of consultants.
Jeff O'Neill updated the Parks Commission on funding for the land acquisition. The City's share
of $565,000 will come from park dedication funds that have been accumulating over the years.
The park dedication fund will not be depleted by this acquisition as there is approximately
$1,000,000 in park dedication monies. The City will be making an annual payment to Wright
County who will upfront the cost of the acquisition. Another funding option, in addition to park
dedication funds, could include the sale of city owned land. Further City and County
contributions require that the state comes up with their 1/3 of the purchase price.
Jeff O'Neill brought up the possibility of receiving funds through the recently adopted Clean
Water Land and Legacy Amendment. Angela Schumann stated that the Council at their January
26, 2009 meeting will be acting on a position statement which would support that outstate
Minnesota gets an equitable share of these funds. Brian Stumpf felt that even if the funding
from the state didn't come through, the City and County are committed to this project and would
work diligently to come up with the funding sources needed for the acquisition. He didn't see
them just abandoning this unique opportunity because of reduced or lack of state funding.
Natural Resources Inventory: The Parks Commission received a copy of the completed
Natural Resources Inventory and Assessment. Larry Nolan asked how this document was to be
used to help them in their planning. Angela Schumann noted it was tool to help in planning and
is not a set of ordinances or regulations to be followed. The Parks Commission would use the
information in the document when a development is proposed to help ascertain what natural
feature should be preserved. The City had received a grant from the Department of Natural
Resources to conduct this inventory and there is approximately $5,000 of the grant funds
remaining. It is anticipated that these funds will be used in developing ordinances relating
natural resources preservation.
8. Annual review of the Parks Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan.
Angela Schumann was present for the review so that she could relay comments and
recommendations by the Parks Commission to the Planning Commission. The Parks
Commission did a page by page review of specific sections of Chapter 3 as well as Chapter 5
dealing specifically with parks. The Park Commission noted a number of changes in the list of
facilities at existing parks (pages 5-2 through 5-5). The question was raised whether these type
of corrections require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or does the Comprehensive Plan
merely reflect what was in place at the time it was adopted (2007). Larry Nolan suggested that
these changes are noted and be incorporated when the next update to the ordinance takes place.
Rick Traver suggested that in listing the parks it should be designated which facilities are ADA
2
Park Commission Minutes: January 22, 2009
(Americans with Disability Act) compliant. Some of the changes in park facilities that were
noted include: 1) Removal of the play facilities at Balboul Park; 2) The addition of the fishing
pier and flower garden for East/West Bridge Park; 3) Addition of basketball court at Groveland
Park; 4) Change of disc golf area at Park West from 3 hole to 9 hole and 5) Addition of
playground area at Sunset Ponds Park. A grammatical correction was also noted in #3 on page
5-6 and on page 5-11 under trails. There was also some discussion about clarifying that YMCA
is not a City park.
The Commission talked about what would constitute an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
Angela Schumann stated a shift in policy such as moving away from regional parks or changing
the standards for neighborhood parks would be an example of an amendment. She also
addressed the notion that park dedication funds received from a development are to be utilized in
the area of the development. Although this was the understanding of the Parks Commission
state statutes do not require that park dedication funds are used in the area that generated the
funds. She did note that there have been some changes in park dedication requirements which
will be coming back to the Park Commission at some future date for review. One of the changes
in the statute says the City can require the developer to pay at the time of platting the value of the
land but not the value of improvements.
9. Review of Park and Trail portion of the Draft Transportation Plan.
The Parks Commission was being asked specifically to focus their review on the portion of the
draft Transportation Plan dealing with non-motorized activity such as trails and pedestrian
activities although any other comments they had on the plan would be passed on to the City
Engineer. The Park Commission comments will be given to the Planning Commission who will
be conducting a public hearing on the Transportation Plan at their February meeting. Larry
Nolan asked what some specific "traffic calming measures" would be. Angela Schumann cited
narrow streets, winding roads and bumpouts as some examples. Nancy McCaffrey and Gene
Emanuel both noted that on Page 38 the figure referenced under Potential Motorized/Non-
Motorized Conflict Points should be 5.2 and not 5.3.
Brian Stumpf stated on Page 37 when they discuss the CSAH 75/CSAH 39 intersection whether
they were talking about the intersection on the east side or west side of town. Staff indicated that
they believe the comments made were to apply to both intersections but they will get verification
of that. Brian Stumpf didn't feel the CSAH 75/CSAH 39 intersection at the west end of town
was as much of a problem since the traffic volumes were less. Larry Nolan stated it has always
been a problem for pedestrians to cross CSAH 75 at the west end of town. Brian Stumpf stated
that the east end of town had higher traffic volumes and wider streets. Gene Emanuel asked if
they would want to designate this as a pedestrian crossing study area. Brian Stumpf questioned
where the money would come from to the study. Brian Stumpf asked how much pedestrian
traffic should be in the area of the CSAH 18 pedestrian bridge. It was noted there are a number
of residential developments in the area.
Larry Nolan suggesting adding another bullet point in Section 5.5 that would include "Pedestrian
Crossing Study area and then list the areas for further study such CSAH 75/CSAH 39. There
was some discussion on the wording that should be used. Rick Traver felt just adding
"Pedestrian Crossing Study" would be sufficient. Brian Stumpf suggested taking out CSAH
75/CSAH 39 and leaving it more generic rather than citing specific intersections.
Park Commission Minutes: January 22, 2009
Tom Pawelk asked about the meeting with Big Lake as far as the Transportation Plan since the
river crossing would be a connection. Larry Nolan stated Figure 5-2 did not show the trails
correctly and felt the map should be changed to reflect what is there now. Nancy McCaffrey
asked about using demographic information from 2000. Staff informed the Parks Commission
that the information from the last census (2000) was what was used and when the 2010 census is
completed, the plan would reflect that information.
RICK TRAVER MOVED TO APPROVE SECTION 5.5 OF THE DRAFT MONTICELLO
TRANSPORTATION PLAN WITH A CORRECTION TO IDENTIFY THE FIGURE UNDER
POTENTIAL MOTORIZED/NON-MOTORIZED CONFLICT POINTS AS FIGURE 5-2.
Larry Nolan asked about the triangular piece of land and was informed that it was part of the
Schulender property. Since this land is not developed this parcel should be removed. The Parks
Commission noted that the Bertram Chain of Lakes was not shown. Tom Pawelk believed that it
was not shown because the property was not in the City limits. It was suggested that since the
property is owned by the City and County is should be shown even if it is not in the city limits.
Tom Pawelk will check into this.
RICK TRAVER AMENDED HIS MOTION TO INCLUDE ADDING THE BERTRAM
CHAIN OF LAKES AREA AND TO UPDATE THE TRAILS AT MONTISSIPPI PARK TO
REFLECT WHAT IS THERE NOW. NANCY MCCAFFREY SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
13. Discussion with Christopher Hadfield regarding his interest in serving on the Parks
Commission.
Christopher Hadfield and the Parks Commission discussed his background and interest in
serving on the Parks Commission. Mr. Hadfield had attended high school in Monticello and had
recently moved back to the area. As well as being a regular user of the City's parks and trails,
Mr. Hadfield had considerable volunteer experience relating to the outdoors. This included work
done in the Forest Reserve in Illinois and the Citizen Lake Monitoring Program through the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. As part of the Citizen Lake Monitoring Program Mr.
Hadfield works with the lakes in the Monticello area including Bertram Lake, Long Lake and
Mud Lake. The Parks Commission was impressed with his knowledge of the YMCA property
and the natural features it contained.
It was noted that Mr. Hadfield resides in the township and is not a resident of the City. The
ordinance establishing the Parks Commission states that members must be residents of the City.
The Parks Commission expressed their concern about the difficulty in attracting good candidates
to serve on the board. They also mentioned that at some point properties in the orderly
annexation area will be coming into the city and it may be beneficial to have board
representation from that area. It was suggested that the ordinance be amended to read
something to the effect that up to one member of the board may be anon-resident but must
reside within the orderly annexation area. Brian Stumpf suggested that the proposed amendment
come before the Council at the first meeting in February so that if it is approved the Parks
Commission will be at full force for their February meeting.
4
Park Commission Minutes: January 22, 2009
Christopher Hadfield said he appreciated the support the Parks Commission is demonstrating to
have him on the Parks Commission. He realizes the difficulty not being a resident creates for the
Park Commission.
GENE EMANUAL MOVED TO HAVE THE COUNCIL CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO
THE ORDINANCE THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR UP TO ONE NON-RESIDENT TO
SERVE ON THE PARKS COMMISSION PROVIDING THE INIVIDUAL RESIDED IN THE
ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREA. NANCY MCCAFFREY SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
RICK TRAVER MOVED THAT IF THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT IS APPROVED
THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF CHRISTOPHER HADFIELD
TO FILL THE VACANCY CREATED ON THE PARKS COMMISSION BY THE
RESIGNATION OF RICK TRAVER. NANCY MCCAFFREY SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. Approve the minutes of the November 20, 2008 Parks Commission meeting.
Larry Nolan indicated on Page 2, #7 the language should clarify that the lights that were
removed from the bridge dated back to 1926 and not removed in 1926.
RICK TRAVER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 20, 2008 PARKS
COMISSION MEETING WITH THE CLARIFICATION NOTED. NANCY MCCAFFREY
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. Consideration of adding items.
None.
5. Citizens comments and requests.
Tom Pawelk stated they have received a number of comments about the good condition of the
sliding hills and rinks.
6. Discussion of 2009 Budget.
Tom Pawelk felt that the Park budget was not in too bad of a shape considering the amount of
cuts the City had to make. At this time the approved budget has not been issued by the Finance
Department and when that information is made available, Tom Pawelk will bring it back to the
Parks Commission. He did note that he has $75,000 in the budget for improvements.
Nancy McCaffrey asked if there were any funds to do something with the Monte Hill area. She
noted an article in the paper about buckthorn removal from a metro area park and grant
availability. Since this is a unique area she was hoping something could be done in the way of
nature trails and educational opportunities. Rick Traver asked if the City had made any
determination on what will be done with this property. Brian Stumpf said the Council at this
time does not have a specific plan for how the property will be used. He added that with the
5
Park Commission Minutes: January 22, 2009
current economic situation he would not be in favor of doing much in that area. Gene Emanuel
said if the City does not allow access to the property would it pay to apply for grant funds.
Nancy McCaffrey felt there was a need to preserve the property and consider this area for future
planning. The question was raised whether the City would consider the sale of this property to
help fund the YMCA property acquisition. Brian Stumpf noted that the City does have
commercial land that could be sold to help fund the YMCA acquisition.
The Parks Commission briefly talked about the Water Tower Park and asked that this item be
placed on the February agenda.
7. Proiect /plans for 2009.
Tom Pawelk explained some of the projects proposed for 2009 which include: 1) Replacing the
roof at the Xcel Ballfield concession stand; 2) Replace the roof at the Ellison Park log shelter;
3) Construction of sidewalk entrance from pedestrian crossing at the hospital into the park;
4) Irrigation, backstop and other amenities to Sunset Ponds Park; 5) Patio by seating area at
Hillcrest Park; 6) Pioneer Park -Construction of rock wall; 7) Purchase of recreational
equipment; 8) Possibly climbing wall for Pioneer Park or Groveland (net materials) and
9) Landscaping work at Front Street Park and irrigation work; landscape the area around the
gazebo at East Bridge Park; and 10) Set up for Community Gardens. The budget also includes
some funds for purchase of equipment and for painting and staining of various park facilities and
some security surveillance improvements.
10. Approval of resident tree sale.
Tom Pawelk indicated that there are monies in the Shade Tree Fund for the resident tree sale.
The price for the trees should be close to what it was in 2008 but there is some difference in the
variety of species being offered. The tree pickup is proposed to take place on April 18th
Tom Pawelk informed the Parks Commission that the Council would be looking at proposed
amendment to the Shade Tree Ordinance that would expand the scope of trees covered and not
limit it to just the Dutch Elm diseased trees.
NANCY MCCAFFREY MOVED TO APPROVE THE MONTICELLO TREE PROGRAM
FOR 2009. GENE EMANUEL SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
11. Park Maintenance.
Tom Pawelk indicated that most of the department time was spent on snow removal and
maintenance of the skating rinks. The equipment purchased for snow removal from the
sidewalks is working well. Tom Pawelk reported a recent change to the ordinance on snow
removal which increases the length of time property owners have to remove snow from the
sidewalk. The Park Department is responsible for removing snow from the parking lots and
sidewalks and maintaining the rinks. This change in the ordinance came to the Council because
of the situation in Sunset Ponds where there are a number of foreclosures and the City had to do
the snow removal.
6
Park Commission Minutes: January 22, 2009
Tom Pawelk also noted that they have had a number of burials which took staff time. Some of
the cemetery records date from 1909 and are not always accurate. The addition of the GPS
equipment will help with locating the marker pins but they have determined that not all the grave
sites have pins.
Gene Emanuel asked if there was any additional information on the financial report for the
concessions operation at the ballfield especially anything that would shed some light on the
negative cash flow that was shown. Tom Pawelk indicated that additional work was done at the
concessions building in order for it to meet state standards and this cost was included in the
report. Gene Emanuel clarified that the report did include capital improvements as well as
operations. There was discussion on the financial reports that the Parks Commission would like
to see. Tom Pawelk noted that last year was the first year that the City operated the concessions
at the ballfields and hopefully with a new financial system and one year under the belt the
financial reports will be clearer and more accurate. The Parks Commission also talked about a
capital improvements program so that they could see for the long term what kind of purchases
and projects would be needed. Tom Pawelk showed the Parks Commission some of the
financial tracking forms he used and indicated he would try to bring something back to the Parks
Commission on the financial reports at the next meeting. The Parks Commission stated that past
reports were not clear or easily understandable by the non-accountant so they would like to see a
report that was more user friendly.
14. Adiourn.
The Parks Commission thanked Rick Traver for his time (12 years) on the Parks Commission,
his dedication in helping the development of parks and trails in the City and also his work on the
Cemetery Committee.
RICK TRAVER MOVED TO ADJOURN AT 6:25 P.M. GENE EMANUEL SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Recording Secretary
7
~~~dIMARY 2008 BALLFIELD CONCESSIONS:
REVENUE:
BALLFIELD CONCESSIONS 40,000 29,795.53
EXPENSES:
OFFICE SUPPLIES 500 95.48
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 200
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES 8,500 1,781.58
GENERAL OPERATING COSTS 2,573.37
GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES 500 321.41
MISC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
T&EICONCESS[ON EQUIPMENT 5,000
BEER/MALT BEVERAGES 1,000 4,446.69
CONCESSION FOOD PRODUCT 12,000 12,749.74
PROF SERV-DATA PROCESSING 1,000 552.50
PROF SERV-SOFTWARE/PROGRAM 122.25
PROF SVC-WEBSITElEMAIL 400 459.92
MISC PROF SERVICES 696.00
TELEPHONE 60.57
INSURANCE-LIAR & DRAM SHOP 1,200
PROPERTY INSURANCE
ELECTRIC 1,000 2,067.73
REPAIR &MAINT -BUILDING 5,000 3,608.57
REPAIR &MAINT -MACH & EQUIP 125.76
LICENSES & PERMITS 1,000 403.75
PRIZES 58.55
MISC OTHER EXPENSES 0.85
TOTAL BALLFIELD EXPENSES: 37,300 30,124.75
Less One time Facility Remodel costs: -7,102.00
Plus concession staff salaries 5425.00
OPERATING EXPENSES BF Concessions 28,447.75
NET BF Concessions Income 1,347.78
LEAGUE FINANCIAL SUMMARY
League Fees 22,010.00
Lea ue Manager Salary -2,653.00
Umpires - -11,792.75
Sanctions Fees & Prizes -1,710.00
Net League Income 5,854.25
Net income to MCC from Ball Fields $7,202
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Telephone: 783.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.256'1 planners@nacplanning.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Angela Schumann
FROM: Stephen Grittman
DATE: March 4, 2009
RE: Monticello -Park Dedication Analysis
NAC FILE: 191.06 - 08.41
Background
This memo summarizes the City's Park Dedication requirements, based on data you
sent to me relating to park and trail areas, current and future development areas, and
the City's acquisition of a portion of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park.
To start off, it is important to remember a couple of basic principles. First, general
"exactions" law requires that the City can exact property based on the proportionate
share of demand placed on a system by the development in question. That is, if a
development project constitutes 1 % of the overall demand on a public service, the City
may expect to recoup 1 % of its costs from that development. Second, the state law
permits the City to take some of its exactions in cash, but it is important that cash
takings are generally equivalent to the value of land takings. Finally, it is important to
apportion the costs of a system to both future and existing development - a City cannot
ascribe all of its costs of a public service to future development when some of the
demand for that service is attributable to current property owners.
Land Dedication
Based on the numbers provided, the current City population creates a demand for park
land at a rate of 9.0% of total land use. That is to say, to satisfy current demand, 9.0%
of the City's land is occupied by park and open space uses. For the purposes of this
analysis, I will assume that reasonable estimate of the appropriate level of park service.
With this assumption, we can then estimate the park area necessary to serve future
population, as well as a reasonable apportionment of the Bertram Lake acquisition.
The current City boundaries encompass approximately 4,900 acres, about 29.3% of the
area of the future boundary including the orderly annexation area of 11,800 acres for a
total of 16,700 acres. Current park and trail acreage is approximately 437 acres.
Assuming that the future growth area will also require 9% of its land area to provide
local and community parks, this will add about 1,060 acres to the City's park system,
resulting in a local and community park supply of about 1,500 acres, rounded.
Adding the City's share of Bertram Chain of Lakes to the mix, an additional 400 acres is
being acquired by the City. This regional park acquisition is above and beyond the local
park needs discussed above. As such, it needs to be added to the 9.0% park
dedication requirement to permit the City to recoup dedication funds adequate to
provide for both local and regional park needs.
As noted above, the existing developed area of the City is 29.3% of the future park
service territory. As such, that percentage of Bertram Chain of Lakes is the
responsibility of existing property owners. The remaining 70.7% can be attributed to
future development. This means that 283 acres of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Park is
being acquired for future growth. Adding that to the 1,060 acres necessary for local
park use results in a total acquisition of 1,343 acres of park land to be acquired for new
development. Spreading that over the 11,800 acres of future development results in a
park dedication amount of 11.4%.
This is to say, by requiring every developer to provide 11.4% of their land for park
dedication, you would acquire, through dedication, the number of acres expected for
local and regional purposes.
Fee in lieu -cash per acre
Of course, most development will not occur in precisely the right location to provide for
the park system you are seeking. As such, the City is able to require a cash fee lieu of
land dedication to use for purchase of land that is located according to the City's plan,
such as Bertram Chain of Lakes.
Under Minnesota statutes, the City may set this fee to be equal to the value of raw land
no later than at the time of final plat -this is the value of raw land that is immediately
developable, but is not yet actually developed. An example of such land would be land
that has utilities, streets, and all other services extended right up the edge of the
property, but which has not yet been actually developed. You have estimated the value
of this land at $28,000 per acre, based on data from the Bertram Lakes acquisition.
We should pause here to recap. If a developer is proposing a subdivision, the City can
require a dedication of 11.4% of the land as the proportionate share of park land owed
2
by the developer as a result of his development project. For an imaginary 88 acre
parcel, the park dedication share would be 10 acres. In lieu of that acreage, the City
may require that the developer provide a cash payment instead - in this case, $280,000
(the value of 10 acres of land). The result that comes from this on a per acre basis is
$3,182 of cash payment in lieu of each acre of the development area.
The City may also choose to split the dedication. Perhaps you would want half of the
land area, and half of the cash - 5 acres and $140,000. Any similar requirement would
be appropriate.
Fee in lieu -cash per unit
Requiring a payment from the developer at the time of final plat (or allowing by
development contract apro-rated payment schedule) is the simplest formula, and it is
most consistent with the language of the statute. However, Monticello has been in the
practice of permitting the park dedication fee to be paid at the time of house
construction. This fee commonly is added to the cost of a building permit, meaning that
a builder pays the fee and adds that to the cost of the house sale. Obviously, if the
developer pays the fee up front, is added to the cost of the lot price required from the
builder -the only difference here is the timing.
The difficulty with this approach can be tracking split land-fee dedication requirements.
If the City takes some land -thus reducing the amount fee to be paid -somebody will
need to track the fee payment as building permits are issued, rather than having a
contract with the developer for a fixed sum.
So, the question comes down to how to apportion the fee if you are not going to charge
it to the developer on a per-acre basis. We have talked about population calculations,
but a per-unit fee base provides a pretty reliable basis. This approach best
approximates the impact of a development on the park system, since a denser project
would create a greater park usage.
We have estimated the net density of residential development to be 2.25 units per acre.
This estimate accounts for road right of way, wetlands, and other deductions from the
gross developable land area. For the 88 acre development discussed above, this would
translate to an expected unit count of 198 units. Thus, rather than the $280,000 in lump
sum cash, the City would pro-rate that over the unit count, resulting in a per-unit park
dedication fee of $1,414 per unit.
Summary
This memo calculates the land dedication for parks that can be assigned to new
development, and the commensurate fee that can be charged in lieu of land dedication.
These are as follows:
3
11.4% of gross land area dedication
$3,182 of cash payment per gross acre of development area
$1,414 of cash payment per unit
The per unit charge has the advantage (as noted above) of increasing the payment
required when the City approves a residential project at a density higher than 2.25 units
per acre. This should be fair, given the greater demand placed on the park system by
higher density development.
4
N
''~^
v/
0
_U
(~
U
C
O
_U
0
C6
~° ~
~ V
Q rn
N ~
0 ~
0 ~
0
C
O
a+
to
L~
a
a
a
a
a N ~ ~ ~ ~
ca
U
w
~ ~
i~
y d
Y Y
a
~ c~
~ .
~
d ~ ~
Y
Z ~ Q ~ . Q
F- d _
~ c U
W ~ CO I.L O ~
M
.~
0
w
o
R J
1 '~
a
c r-
~ ~,
_
2 ~
~ ;~
c~ ~
o
o
O
ro U O
3 a> in = ~
c ~ ~ ~ c;
~
d cG O --: ~ to ca ~ O
z v c~ _, ~ a a ~ ~.
N
N
~.
0
co
O
N
T
N
0
Y
a
c
X
w
N
Y
L
c~
a
c
3
O
U
0
v
N
0 0 0 0 °o 0 0'
0 ~~ ~ ~ Q 0.
U ~.
~ 0
D
~
O O U
U
•-
3 ~
0
o ._ ~ c a> ~~
LL J ~ ~ ~ d fn
0
0
ti
v
a~
.~
o cow ccoo
rn ai ~ co 00 0
N V ~! ~ 01
~ tp t~
~ ~ d ^ lC
~ .r+
O
~
Q Q N
R
d W H
~ ~~~ a ~°
C
~~ ~'~~
~° =ate
v ~Q
R Y
~~°. ~ a
_ o
•~ m ~
V
Y ~' i~
L
d
a ~' a
U
c~
Q
c
,o
..,
c~
x
m
c
Q
0
w
E
c~
w
m
0
ca
~~
U
Q ~ Q ~
~ ~
~_~~ c~
1~Uf~Q
0 0 0
o c cc ~
N ~ 1~ M
~ T
r
Y ^ C
~ N O
a w
c d 3
O L
.~ a a
~ o E
~ ~ ~
,_ ~ G1
m
E a 3
~ ~
L
m a
K
d
c
a
c
Y
L
f~
a
0
d
C
d
L
a
c a~
a
~
c>3 ~ ~ ^ cLa
°' ° " m c o
c ~ c m ~
~ ~ ~ m
~ ~ ~
c ~, 4 cLv~~ -~:?
o
k ~
~ sZ
Q ~
_ ~ ~ ~ ~
fD U .~ C U~ (n
...
= a~ ca ~ ~ ~ O a O .o
O N + ~
U O ~,~ L U L ~
~ t O y~ f6 p (6 C~ O.
~
~ ~
~ ~
O ~ N ~ '
N C O ~ Q.
N
~
a ~ ~ p~ N ~
p~
1 C
v
p
p
O ~ 4O
~ a 0
~ ~ p to N
U
p L ~
~ N
cn ~
C +-~ +-~ ~ ~ ,
/~~
J v j C C L v C~ (0
°
v
v `~
° ~
O N ~ O N ~ O
a
a
~ ~ ~
p ~
o\
~ ~ O O Rl o
N ~
U N
~
~
~ ~ ~ cn ~ U •"" ~ ~,
~~
~
N Q O Q O~~ f0 C N to O
Q 7 C U ..
a Q (0 N Q a N ~ ~. 7~~
N
N~~~
y (Q ,~ ,C (B ~ ~ C
7
d ~ lC) ~ ~ ~ N t!7 N f~
m~ W W c~B ~0 m dNNapp~ II ~M~dp-
O O O G
~ ~ O O O
~ ~O 1~ 00 00
t0 00 N
r ~
d d C ~
L L G1
L
~ 7
+
~"
Q Q Q ~ ~ ~
' 'Q
d ~
V V d
V Q ~ ~
~
a ~
V
C C Y d ~ w'
a c
~
c c ~
v a
i
ea R
Y Y ~
.~ ~ ~_
C ~ 3
R R
a d
~ ~
y
N
~C W i
~ -°'a a °'
~ d
~° Y
`°
z z
0 0
m d
~ ~
c c
R R
~ ~a
m o~
CHAPTER 6
PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC USE
SECTION:
11-6-1: Dedication Requirement
11-6-2: Cash Contribution
11-6-3: Delayed Dedication Payment
11-6-4: Purchase or Condemnation of Lands
11-6-5: Location and Configuration of Dedication
11-6-1: DEDICATION REQUIREMENT:
(A) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.358, Subdivision 2, the City Council of
Monticello shall require all developers requesting platting or replatting of land
in the City of Monticello to contribute an amount of land for public park and
trail purposes. The location of said land shall be at the discretion of the City
Council. The amount of said land shall be reasonably commensurate with
demand that the platting or replatting places on the City park system, as
described in the Comprehensive Plan. For purposes of this section, an amount
of land equal to ten percent (10%) of the total gross land area of the plat shall
be presumptively defined as "reasonably commensurate." In the event that the
subdivider objects to the ten percent (10%) standard, the City shall, at the
developer's request and expense, conduct a specific dedication study of the
park system and the demand placed on the system by the proposed plat. (Alt:
For purposes of this Section, an amount of land equal to one (1) acre for each
75 persons in the subdivision shall be presumptively defined as "reasonably
commensurate." To estimate the population of the subdivision, a household
size of 3.5 persons per unit for single family homes and 2.5 persons per unit for
attached housing shall be used.] Prior to conducting the study, the City shall
obtain a waiver of statutory time lines for plat approval during the conduct of
the study. No approval of final plats, nor construction of any improvements,
shall occur until the park dedication study is completed. In lieu of land
dedication, the City Council may require a cash contribution in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, or a combination of both. The City Council's
decision on land and/or cash shall be made following recommendations from
the City's Park Commission and staff, in accordance with the Comprehensive
Plan. (#412, 8/23/04)
(B) In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, where the City Council determines that
the park dedication requirements shall be paid in a cash contribution, the
amount of said contribution shall be based on the market value of the land not
later than at the time of final plat. The City may require that the subdivider
MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XUChapt 6/Page 1
provide an appraisal to determine the market value. In the alternative, the city
may, by Ordinance, establish a fee per residential unit that will meet the cash
dedication requirement. The determination of the appropriate fee calculation
shall be made by the City Council. (#412, 8/23/04)
(C) The City Council shall not accept for credit against a subdivider's park
dedication requirement any of the following:
1. Delineated wetlands.
2. Land within a designated flood plain.
3. Land encumbered by a utility easement such as a petroleum or electric
power transmission line (except where such easement is a standard
platting requirement of the City of Monticello pursuant to Section 11-5-
4 of this Chapter, and where the City determines that the land within
the easement will be usable for park, trail or open space purposes).
4. Land within a drainage easement or other land required for stormwater
treatment.
The City may, at its discretion, accept lands in the above categories for park
dedication purposes if it deems the dedication to be of public benefit. No
credit shall be given against the subdivider's park dedication requirement,
however, unless the City determines that the land will be used for a specific
public park, trail or open space purpose. (#412, 8/23/04)
(D) Land dedicated for park purposes shall be transferred to the City of Monticello
by warranty deed. The transfer of said land shall occur at the time of recording
of the final plat. For multiple-phased developments, all of the park dedication
land shown on the approved Preliminary Plat shall be transferred to the City
upon recording of the first final plat, in the form of Outlot(s) and shall not be
shown as "Park" on the plat. The Development Agreement may permit the
phasing of said land transfer. In addition, the Development Agreement shall
grant the subdivider a license to enter the park dedication land for the purposes
of required grading, seeding or other work approved by the City Council.
(#412, 8/23/04)
(E) In addition to the park dedication requirements listed above, each newly
subdivided lot shall pay a surcharge for park and trail development purposes.
The surcharge will be at a prevailing rate as determined by the City Council.
(#412, 8/23/04)
11-6-2: CASH CONTRIBUTION: All monies collected from cash contributions shall be
placed in a special fund from which only those public uses as listed in (1) above may
be constructed or improved or land for those same uses maybe acquired.
11-6-3: DELAYED DEDICATION PAYMENT: Upon petition by the developer, the Council
may approve a delay in the actual dedication of the cash required in lieu of land until
MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XUChapt 6/Page 2
such time as development occurs on the property being platted provided that a proper
legal agreement is executed guaranteeing such dedication. Delayed dedication
payment shall include eight percent (8%) interest per year.
11-6-4: PURCHASE OR CONDEMNATION OF LANDS: Where a proposed park,
playground or other recreational area, proposed school site, or other public ground that
has been indicated in the official map and/or master plan is located in whole or in part
within a proposed subdivision, such proposed public site shall be designated as such
and should be dedicated to the City, School District, or other proper governmental
unit. If the subdivider chooses not to dedicate an area in excess of the land required
under this section hereof for such proposed public site, the Council shall be required to
act to approve or disapprove the plat of the subdivision for a period of ninety (90) days
after the subdivider meets all the provisions of the subdivision title in order to permit
the Council, School Board, or other appropriate governmental unit to consider the
proposed plat and to take the necessary steps to acquire, through purchase or
condemnation, all or part of the public site proposed under the official map or master
plan.
11-6-5: LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF DEDI~ATION• ~,.In such cases where the
developer is required to dedicate land area, the City Council of the City of Monticello
shall have the right to determine the geographic location and configuration of said
dedication.
MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XUChapt 6/Page 3
Parks Department Work Load Spring-Summer 2009
To do list:
Winter snow fence removal- EB, Groveland, Freeway Fields and Mississippi Drive
Pick up all temporary signs at parks
Remove gates at Otter Creek Pedestrian Bridge
Chain Back gates at Ice-T Bridge
Remove dirt from WB
Removal of all snow equipment
Work on Cushman
Install all mowing equipment
Spring fertilizing project
Spring tree handout
Possible tree planting along 7th St
Install WB Basketball poles
WB Lions Flag Pole project
Vac out WB drain the
Install WB flower garden
Fix Lights under Hwy 25
Playground inspections
Install Docks for opening of fishing
Grade Cemetery roads
Install or replace flags at Hillside, WB, Ellison, Xcel and Riverside Cemetery
Park irrigation start up
Park building start up
Irrigation inventory
Install new pump at Freeway Fields
Irrigate Front St Park
Sweep sidewalks/pathways
Seed WB skating rink (Needs to be ready for walk n roll)
Seed 4th St Rinks
Maybe some spot seeding at Groveland Park
Core-aerating all Parks and athletic fields
Seed Cardinal Hills snow plow damage
Place planters at round about
Put all summer garbage cans out in parks
Clean up all flower gardens throughout city
Community Garden project- install fence, add more organic matter to area
Install water service for community garden
Complete shed for community garden
Install new hot water heater at Pioneer Concession building
Replace faucet at Pioneer
Contact electrician about outdoor power at Pioneer
Order bathrooms for season
Contact Sentence to serve about summer work schedule
Pedestrian bridge wood replacement
Clean up across from shop (Cemetery pillar, old wood, metal and etc.) Rain day project
Chipping Requests
Cemetery Requests
Haul concrete out of dump
Remove Dugouts from Xcel
Build a rock wall at Pioneer and landscape
Work with a volunteer group and hang up Blue Bird houses in open spaces
EB wedding gazebo
Work with EB master gardener on plan
Finish EB landscaping (pavers, block and plants)
Paint Ellison park bathrooms
Replace broken shakes at Ellison shelter
Replace Ellison log shelter roof
Stain Ellison gazebo
Fix bench on West Pathway
Remove Arborvitaes from sign at Hillcrest Park (Deer Damage)
Organize w/street department when they can help pave Sunset Ponds pathway
Pathway maintainnece
Talk to Kitty about replacing pavers at city hall
Make an anchor system for tables at shelters
June 13Th big event at Bertram Chain of Lakes
Picnic table repair
Pathway info sigs
Landscape in front of city hall
Remove pop machine from 4ch St
Build a bridge out at Bertram Park
Cut Trails at Bertram
Construct a parking lot at Bertram
Sign park area at Bertram
xpenditures:
Project Name
ept. CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2009 Thru 2013
r
Page # 2009 2010
011 2012 2013
pier/Scanner/Printer Admin. F - 4 ,
dger Size Color Scanner Admin. F - 5 4,000
Personal Computer Replacement MIS F - 6 15,600 11,700 16,900 11,..700 15,600
rver Component Upgrades MIS F - 7 2,000 4,000 4,000
~curity Camera Systems MIS F - 8 10,000 10,000 10,000
Laptop Computer Replacement MIS F - 9 2,500
Mintor 5 Pagers Fire F - 10 49,594
~e Pumper Truck Replacement Fire F - 11 508,980
Duty Officer Vehicle Fire F - 12 20,000
ilding Inspection Vehicle Bldg Ins F - 13 ~ 20,000 22,000
blic Works Office Remodel PW Adm F - 14 50,000
S Hardware & Software Eng. F - 15 11,875 19,600
avement Management Software Eng. F - 16 5,000
dro CAD Drainage Software Eng. F - 17 5,000
nchro Studio 7 Traffic Software Eng. F - 18 8,000
Ditch Mower Tractor Streets F - 19 80,000
d-Size Tractor/Loader Streets F - 20 65,000
r Compressor Streets F - 21 20,000
Truck Replacement Streets F - 22 75,000 60,000
cket Truck Replacement Streets F - 23 100,000
acktop Paver Streets F - 24 75,000
acktop Plainer Streets F - 25 20,000
uter Streets F - 26 20,000
ncrete Saw Streets F - 27 15,000
ckhoe Streets F - 28 80,000
Plow Truck Replacement Streets F - 29 185,000
ok Dump Truck Str/lce F - 30 237,500
ow Go Snow Blower Ice/Snow F - 31 120,000
Truck Replacement arks - 42,000'? 42,000 ,
300 Bobcat Parks F - 33 _
__ 48,000 V°~'
-
~e`r`i~eplacement Parks F - 34 -
_
40,000 - N ° 40,000 42,000 40,000
NSP Concession Stand Roof Parks F - 35 10,000/'
nset Ponds Park Development Parks F - 36 f.--- 10,000/
lison Park Shelter Improvement Parks F - 37 _ ---- 20,000/
illcrest Park Patio/Irrigation Parks F - 38 _ _.___--- 15,000/
ility Mule/Small Truck Parks F - 39 30,000
nters Crossing Park Developme Parks F - 40 60,000
atherstone Park Development Parks F - 41 60,000
Pioneer Park Band Shell Parks F - 42 50,000
~ayground Equipment ReplacemE Parks F - 43 50,000 55,000 50,000
ush Chipper Parks F - 44 20,000
Bobcat Tool Cat Parks F - 45 48,000
onti Hill Park Development Parks F - 46 65,000
shman Truckster Parks F - 47 25,000
Tractor Replacement Parks F - 48
~ 50,000 35,000
000
ader Parks F - 49 a
0 90,
thvvay Construction Parks F - 50 100,00 100,000 500,000 100,000
ertram Lakes Property Acquisitio Pk Ded. F - 51 000 475 0 000 475,000 475,000
torm Water Pond Restoration - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
~
CC Office Expansion MCC F - 53 20,000-
F-1
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
GENERAL FUND 2009
PARKS/ADMINISTRATION PARKS/ADMINISTRATION BUDGET
101.45201.1010 SALARIES, FULL TIME -REG $224,085
101.45201.1020 SALARIES, FULL TIME - OT 1,800
101.45201.1030 SALARIES, PART-TIME -REG 0
101.45201.1031 SALARIES, PART-TIME - OT 0
101.45201.1040 SALARIES, TEMPORARY -REG 67,000
101.45201.1050 SALARIES, TEMPORARY - OT 250
101.45201.1090 SALARIES, OTHER 0
101.45201.1110 SEVERANCE PAY 0
101.45201.1111 SEVERANCE BENEFITS 0
101.45201.1210 PERA CONTRIBUTIONS 15,247
101.45201.1220 FICA CONTRIBUTIONS 18,174
101.45201.1250 MEDICARE CONTRIBUTIONS 4,250
101.45201.1310 HEALTH/DENTAL/LIFE INSURAN 41,293
101.45201.1315 FLEX BENEFITS 500
101.45201.1420 U. C. BENEFIT PAYMENTS 0
101.45201.1520 WORKER'S COMP BENEFIT PAYM 0
101.45201.2030 PRINTED FORMS & PAPER 0
101.45201.2065 SAFETY SUPPLIES 2,500
101.45201.2099 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 125
101.45201.2110 CLEANING SUPPLIES 2,000
101.45201.2111 CLOTHING SUPPLIES 500
101.45201.2120 MOTOR FUELS 23,000
101.45201.2130 LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES 100
101.45201.2160 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 12,500
101.45201.2165 PARK SUPPLIES 8,000
101.45201.2199 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 8,000
101.45201.2210 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 6,000
101.45201.2211 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 2,000
101.45201.2220 TIRES 2,000
101.45201.2230 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 7,000
101.45201.2250 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 8,000
101.45201.2251 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 3,000
101.45201.2299 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLIES 10,000
101.45201.2410 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 2,000
101.45201.2440 T&E/MACHINERY 7,000
101.45201.2460 T&E/FURNITURE 0
101.45201.2465 T&E/SAFETY EQUIPMENT 0
101.45201.2471 T&E/OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0
101.45201.2472 T&E/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 0
101.45201.2499 T&E/OTHER 0
101.45201.3110 PROF SRV -CUSTODIAL 0
101.45201.3190 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 300
101.45201.3199 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,500
101.45201.3210 TELEPHONE 2,500
101.45201.3240 DELIVERY MAIL SERVICE (UPS 150
101.45201.3310 TRAVEL EXPENSE 300
101.45201.3320 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 2,000
101.45201.3330 FREIGHT 0
101.45201.3499 ADVERTISING 600
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
101.45201.3520
101.45201.3630
101.45201.3710
101.45201.3720
101.45201.3810
101.45201.3830
101.45201.4010
101.45201.4044
101.45201.4050
101.45201.4080
101.45201.4090
101.45201.4091
101.45201.4099
101.45201.4150
101.45201.4170
101.45201.4199
101.45201.4330
101.45201.4350
101.45201.4360
101.45201.4370
101.45201.4390
101.45201.4399
101.45201.5301
101.45201.5501
101.45201.5601
101.45201.5801
101.45201.7203
PARKS/IMPROVEMENTS
PARKS 101.45202.2199
PARKS 101.45202.2410
PARKS 101.45202.2440
PARKS 101.45202.2460
PARKS 101.45202.2471
PARKS 101.45202.2472
PARKS 101.45202.2499
PARKS 101.45202.3030
PARKS 101.45202.3199
PARKS 1 Q1.45202.3510
PARKS 101.45202.4010
PARKS 101.45202.4150
PARKS 101.45202.4380
PARKS 101.45202.4391
PARKS 101.45202.5201
PARKS 101.45202.5301
PARKS 101.45202.5401
PARKS 101.45202.5601
PARKS 101.45202.5801
PARKS 101.45202.5805
PARKS 101.45202.7203
GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATION 600
VEHICLE INSURANCE 0
PROPERTY TAXES 100
SALES TAX 0
ELECTRIC 12,500
GAS 2,000
REPAIR &MTC -BUILDINGS 6,000
REPAIR &MTC -MACH & EQUI 5,000
REPAIR &MTC -VEHICLES 2,000
REPAIR &MTC -PARKS & REC 0
ADOPT-A-PARK MAINT/EXP 3,000
PATHWAY MAINTENANCE 20,000
REPAIR &MTC -OTHER 3,000
EQUIPMENT RENTAL 800
UNIFORM RENTAL 2,000
MISC RENTALS 0
DUES, MEMBERSHIP & SUBSCRI 400
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS 150
TOWING CHARGES 0
LICENSES & PERMITS 150
PRIZES 200
MISC OTHER EXPENSE 1,000
IMPROVEMENTS p
MOTOR VEHICLES 42,000
FURNITURE & FIXTURES 0
OTHER EQUIPMENT 88,000
TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $674,574
GENERAL FUND 2009
PARKS/IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES $5,000
SMALL TOOLS/MISC 0
T&E/MACHINERY 0
T&E/FURNITURE p
T&E/OFFICE EQUIPMENT p
T&E/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 0
T&E/OTHER 9,000
PROF SRV -ENGINEERING FEE 0
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0
LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 0
REPAIR &MTC -BUILDINGS 0
EQUIPMENT RENTAL p
PUB WKS/ADMIN & INSP FEES 0
PARK TREE REPLACEMENT 0
BUILDINGS p
IMPROVEMENTS 75,000
HEAVY MACHINERY 0
FURNITURE & FIXTURES 0
OTHER EQUIPMENT 0
RECREATION EQUIPMENT 0
TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $89,000
NSP BALLFIELDS
PARKS 101.45203.2065
PARKS 101.45203.2110
PARKS 101.45203.2111
PARKS 101.45203.2120
PARKS 101.45203.2130
PARKS 101.45203.2199
PARKS 101.45203.2210
PARKS 101.45203.2211
PARKS 101.45203.2230
PARKS 101.45203.2250
PARKS 101.45203.2299
PARKS 101.45203.2410
PARKS 101.45203.2440
PARKS 101.45203.2460
PARKS 101.45203.2471
PARKS 101.45203.2472
PARKS 101.45203.2499
PARKS 101.45203.3199
PARKS 101.45203.3210
PARKS 101.45203.3499
PARKS 101.45203.3810
PARKS 101.45203.4010
PARKS 101.45203.4044
PARKS 101.45203.4080
PARKS 101.45203.4099
PARKS 101.45203.4380
PARKS 101.45203.4390
PARKS 101.45203.4399
PARKS 101.45203.5301
PARKS 101.45203.5601
PARKS 101.45203.5801
PARKS 101.45203.7203
SHADE TREE FUND
SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL
SHADE 224.46102.1010
SHADE 224.46102.1020
SHADE 224.46102.1030
SHADE 224.46102.1031
SHADE 224.46102.1040
SHADE 224.46102.1050
SHADE 224.46102.1090
SHADE 224.46102.1110
SHADE 224.46102.1210
SHADE 224.46102.1220
SHADE 224.46102.1250
SHADE 224.46102.1310
GENERAL FUND 2009
PARKS/NSP BALLFIELDS BUDGET
SAFETY SUPPLIES $100
CLEANING SUPPLIES 150
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 0
MOTOR FUELS 0
LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES 50
GENL OPERATING SUPPLIES 500
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 100
VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 0
BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 4,000
LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 1,000
MISC REPAIR &MTC SUPPLIES 5,000
SMALL TOOLS/MISC 0
T&E/MACHINERY 3,500
T&E/FURNITURE 0
T&E/OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0
T&E/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 0
T&E/OTHER 0
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000
TELEPHONE 0
ADVERTISING 0
ELECTRIC 4,500
REPAIR &MTC -BUILDINGS 0
REPAIR &MTC -MACH & EQUI 0
REPAIR &MTC -PARKS & REC 0
REPAIR &MTC -OTHER 500
PUB WKS/ADMIN & INSP FEES 0
PRIZES 0
MISC OTHER EXPENSE 0
IMPROVEMENTS 10,000
FURNITURE & FIXTURES 0
OTHER EQUIPMENT 0
TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $30,400
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 2009
SHADE TREE FUND BUDGET
SALARIES, FULL TIME -REG $18,262
SALARIES, FULL TIME - OT 500
SALARIES, PART-TIME -REG 0
SALARIES, PART-TIME - OT 0
SALARIES, TEMPORARY -REG 500
SALARIES, TEMPORARY - OT 0
SALARIES, OTHER 0
SEVERANCE PAY 0
PERA CONTRIBUTIONS 1,266
FICA CONTRIBUTIONS 1,194
MEDICARE CONTRIBUTIONS 279
HEALTH/DENTAULIFE INSURAN 3,907
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
SHADE
224.46102.1315
224.46102.1420
224.46102.1520
224.46102.2030
224.46102.2065
224.46102.2099
224.46102.2111
224.46102.2120
224.46102.2130
224.46102.2199
224.46102.2210
224.46102.2211
224.46102.2250
224.46102.2299
224.46102.2410
224.46102.2440
224.46102.2460
224.46102.2471
224.46102.2472
224.46102.2499
224.46102.3199
224.46102.3310
224.46102.3320
224.46102.3520
224.46102.3720
224.46102.4044
224.46102.4150
224.46102.4350
224.46102.4391
224.46102.4399
224.46102.5301
224.46102.5401
224.46102.5501
FLEX BENEFITS 25
U. C. BENEFIT PAYMENTS 0
WORKER'S COMP BENEFIT PAYM 0
PRINTED FORMS & PAPER 0
SAFETY SUPPLIES 150
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 50
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 150
MOTOR FUELS 0
LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES 0
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 500
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 250
VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 150
LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 0
MISC REPAIR &MTC SUPPLIES 300
SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 200
T&E/MACHINERY 0
T&E/FURNITURE 0
T&E/OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0
T&E/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 0
T&E/OTHER 0
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,000
TRAVEL EXPENSE 0
CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 800
GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATION 300
SALES TAX 0
REPAIR &MTC -MACH & EQUI 350
EQUIPMENT RENTAL 0
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS 0
TREES FOR RESALE 8,000
TREE REPLACEMENT 5,000
MISC OTHER EXPENSE 0
IMPROVEMENTS 0
HEAVY MACHINERY 0
MOTOR VEHICLES 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $50,133
ARKS WEEKLY WORK LIST
DEREK WI PPER
2/26/2009 PUBLIC WORKS REMODEL
2/27/2009. RINKS/SHOP
3/2/2009 SIDEWALKS/RINKS
313!2009 RINKSlSIDEWALKS
3/4/2009 HANG UP SIGNS AT RINKS/ CLEAN OUT FLOOD TRUCK
3/5/2009 DMV
3/6/2009 VAC
3/9!2009 W/TOM G
3/10/2009 PUT SURPLUS STUFF AWAY
3/ l t /2009 SNOW DAY
3/12/2009 DMV
3/13/2009 BATH/TRASH RUN
3!16/2009 MAKE FRAME FOR FRONT OFFICE/DMV
3/ { 7/2009 DMV
3 /1 812009 DMV
3/ t 912009 DMV
Tht~rsclay, €~arch 26, 209 Page I ~f 5
3/ 16/2009 STREET DEPT
3/ 17/2009 DMV
3/18/2009 DMV
3/ 19/2009 DMV
3/20/2009 CHIPPING/DMV
3/23/2009 SWEEP SIDEWALKS
3/24/2009 TABLE REPAIR
3!2512009 BOBCAT BROOM REPLACEMENT
3/26/2009 TABLES/ TRADE SHOW
LEO SCHRODEN
2/26/2009 SICK
2/27/2009 RINKS/SLIDWG HILL fNSPECTIONS
3/2/2009 PLOW ROUTE
3!312009 FINISH ROUT/WORK ON SIGNS/PAINT DOOR
3/4/2009 PT/DMV
3/5/2009 DMV
3/6/2009 PT/BATH TRASH RUN
3(912009 PT/DMV
°i"h~~rsc~ay. Irlarth Zb, 1~iU9
Page 3 of 5
3/4!2009 VAC
3/5/2009 VAC
3/6/2009 VAC
3/9/2009 ADJUST TIME CLOCKS TO DAY LIGHT SAVINGS/CHECK BATHROOMS AND
TRASH
3/10/2009 GET PLOW READY/ PATHWAY LIGHTS
3/I 1/2009 SNOW DAY
3/12/2009 PLOW ROUTES/CEMETERY
3/13/2009 FINISH UP WITH WEST PATH/PUT STUFF AWAY FROM REMODEL
3/16/2009 JUNK DAY MEETING/BATH/TRASH RUN/ BRING TRUCK BACK FROM FARM
3/17/2009 SCHOOL
3/18/2009 SCHOOL
3/ 19/2009 VAC
3/20/2009 CHIPPING REQUESTS
3/23/2009 WB SECURITY/BATH/TRASH/SWEEP PATHWAYS
3/24/2009 SWEEP PATHWAYS
385/2009 DMV
3/26/2009 SHED/ TRADE SHOW
Thu,°s~ay, larch 26. 2G~}9 Fade 5 ~f 5
v
m
~ W W N N N N N N N N N N F-' F-' F-' F-' F-+ F~ I-~ m
~ ~+ o ~o 00 ~ rn to ~ w N N o~ oo ~ rn cn ~ w 3
~ D ~ ~ ~ D ~ D D O ~ O D ~ ~ D D ~ D O m
D ro m ro r~ ~ ~ m cu ro m ro cu m m m ru m ro ru A
r n n ~ n ~ n n n n n n n n n n n n n n
H
rt
p N NO W AO N N W 01 ~ V O O~ I--' A 0 0 0 0~
~.
W ?
W F-~ I--' (J'1 00 A .P I--' W W N O O W A N F-' O O Ol
W V W 01 F-' lD O W l0 00 W O Ol N 01 N N
rt
O
-i
D
r
N W 00 ~' t0 00 W .p V1 W .p A F+ N O~ 'n
00 W ~O FN,, O I~ F, V1 A 0 0 0 C1 V C1 Q1 ° ° N O
v
a
D
r
a
W W N N N N N N N N N N F-~ I-~ 1~ F-' F-~ F-~ F+ I-+ F-~ F-~ Z
F-~ O l~ 00 V 01 l!1 A W N F~ O l0 00 ~I d1 U'1 A W N t-~ O l0 00 V 01 U'1 .p W N F+ C
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ D
a~ ci of ni of of n~ n~ n~ o~ ai c~ c~ o~ of n~ n~ c~ ni o~ o~ of of n, of ni ni o~ of of n~ ~
,A
C1
A
N
N
N
N
00
01
H
~ 00 lD N W F~ N V l0 ~' ~' ~' N W V N O O O O N W N N N F-' W I--~ W W Q1
l0 W A N W N V Q1 00 U'~ Ul 00 W Ui lD V
`Q~
~'!
W S A N W ~ I--~ O O N F-+ F--~ Q1 00 W I--` O O l0 O W V'1 W F~ F-~ W I--+ N A Q1 lfl ~`
V Q1 N O N O Ql U'1 A 00 N O F-~ W N 00 4--~ 00 Ql O 00 l0
r"F
0
r
V1 F+ Vl N W N 1~ N W W N 00 ~'~' W N tli 00 N W W A N W V N F+ TI
01 V V1 A W O A O OD W O V V G t0 N O O ~O O 00 t0 N V W ~O C1 lC V1 V 0
Q
1 ~
v N
~ O
0
00
N
m o
~ N N N N N N N N N F~ F+ F-~ F-' F~ F-~ F-' F--' F~ F~ W O
00 V Q1 l!1 A W N F-~ O lp 00 V Ol Cfl A W N F-~ O l0 00 V Ql l!1 .p W N I-' C
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
~
i
i
i
i
~
i
i
i
~
i
~
i
i
i
i
~
i
i ,^
D
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
D W
fD fD fD fD fD fD (D fD fD fD fD fD lD (D (D fD (D fD (D fD (D fD (D fD (D (D (D fD ~
r ~ a' ~ ~ s ~ a" ~ ~ a ~ a' a ~ ~ ~ a' ~ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ ~ ~ a" a ~
rt
V ~I O O In Ui 00 O V 00 O O O Cn ~"' 01 N O O O O W N lO ~'' M A N N
~~
a
00 W lD O N W U'I lf~ W F~ F-' F-~ W A O V A N O O O lJ'I (!~ O A~ N~ W
O W N W N U'7 V1 W O U'1 A U'i lD Q1 Ol .P O F~ W A
r'F
D
r
A N W Q1 V1 A N N 1~ A~ O A N 00 V F~ V1 N N N C1 TI
O W O V 00 O Vl N F, O Vl W tD ~ V1 00 01 O O O ~p V V1 N N V F+ O ~
v
a
-~
r
3
W N F-~ O ~O 00 V O~ U'7 A W N I--~ A
~ ~ ~ _
O1 ~ ~ ~ G1 d C1 GI N d ~ G7 G1
WI
F+
N
A
~I
W
V
H
O O O O O O O O O O O N F~'',, ~
O O O O O O O O O O A A w S
V N Q1
rt
O
O O O O O O O O O O V W V r
T
T
VT•
D
^Z
Y
~_
Z
D
m
Z
D
Z
n
m
O
a
r
N