Loading...
Planning Commission Minutes - 06/03/2025MINUTES REGULAR MEETING — PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 3, 2025 — 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Chair Andrew Tapper, Rick Kothenbeutel, Teri Lehner, Rob Stark Commissioners Absent: Vice -Chair Melissa Robeck Council Liaison Present: Councilmember Kip Christianson Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman, Tyler Bevier, Bob Ferguson 1. General Business A. Call to Order Chair Tapper called the regular meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Roll Call Andrew Tapper called the roll. C. Consideration of Additional Agenda Items None D. Approval of Agenda ROB STARK MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 3, 2025 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. E. Approval of Meeting Minutes TERI LEHNER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MAY 6, 2025 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Councilmember Kip Christianson asked if the minutes correctly reflected the position of the Commissioners regarding 45-foot lots with context to the composition and percentage. Teri Lehner stated that her interpretation was not that 45-foot lots would never be acceptable, but of the ratio and percentage being at such a high amount was her concern and is also reflected in the minutes. F. Citizen Comment None 2. Public Hearings A. Continued Public Hearing - Consideration of a Request for an Amendment to the Monticello Citv Code, Title XV, Land Usage, Chapter 153: Zoning Ordinance, Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes — 06/03/2025 Section 153.044 Business Base Zoning Districts, Central Community District for standards applicable to Parking and 153.067 Off -Street Parking, Standards applicable to commercial, industrial and civic/institutional uses in the Central Community District (CCD). Applicant: City of Monticello City Planner Steve Grittman spoke to the proposed amendments as related to the context of parking in the downtown district. Mr. Grittman stated that the City provides much of the parking supply for the businesses located in the Central Community District (CCD), yet the current ordinance does not provide enough clarification for an accurate estimation of off -site parking needs and availability. Planner Grittman elaborated on the proposed amendments, including the parking study portion of the proposed amendment. The intention is to refine the parking study requirements to illustrate how much parking is utilized and where the parking exists downtown in proximity to the site location for staff review, short of a hired transportation engineer to conduct said study. This language and the study itself will lend guidance to Community Development staff to determine parking needs per application. Planner Grittman continued to note that the amendment addresses the situation in which the use of property changes to become more intensive. Parking spaces are proposed to be calculated from zero for the use, with on -site parking provided as required or via payment to the City public parking fund. The third portion of the proposal involves amended calculations for restaurant parking in the CCD, said Planner Grittman, to reflect a better estimated occupant load of one parking space per three -seat capacity per building code, as opposed to the current complicated methodology of breakdown by square footage. The fourth portion of the proposed amendment provides a reference in the parking section of ordinance to the parking fund as identified in the CCD, said Planner Grittman. Planner Grittman indicated that the amendment further designates that Community Development staff identify compatible uses for joint parking in the CCD, definition of daytime and nighttime uses, and a modified distance rules for shared parking on a one-to-one basis with other property owner(s). Planner Grittman spoke on the modifications to the joint parking distance rule within the CCD to minimize the number of surface parking spaces. Planner Grittman then spoke to the proposed amendment to address past discussions by Commission to waive the requirement for parking spaces for Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes — 06/03/2025 restaurant and bar outdoor seating, based on the logic that patrons are more likely to walk longer distances in warmer weather to utilize outdoor spaces; these seats are not available during the cold weather season. Chair Andrew Tapper asked if a tracking measure might be available to review and manage joint -use parking agreements in the CCD, to decipher a business parking capacities and if multiple parties might also be involved. Planner Grittman stated that staff reviews parking as part of a conditional use permit process and maintains the recorded proceedings documents. He indicated that a database for tracking joint -parking could be created. As the applications are received cumulatively over time, a better understanding will determine parking needs on a block -by -block basis. Outside of a formal parking study, the database would help identify and address conflicts if they arise. Councilmember Kip Christianson asked for clarification regarding the parking study. Planner Grittman stated a parking study is drafted by or contracted on behalf of the owner at their expense; the City does not conduct its own parking study for CUP applications unless deemed necessary. The extent of the study can be a simple one to provide parking evidence, as to not burden the applicant with overcomplexities. Andrew Tapper referenced an example might include using a satellite view map, identifying the required footage per code, and then counting parking spaces per code language. Planner Grittman added to Chair Tapper's comments, stating that the goal of the study and mapping is to reference how many surface and on -street spaces are occupied throughout a week at varying times and to demonstrate how much and where parking may be available. Andrew Tapper opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Andrew Tapper closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. RICK KOTHENBEUTEL MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2025-016 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 8XX AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, TITLE XV, LAND USAGE, CHAPTER 153: ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 153.044 BUSINESS BASE ZONING DISTRICTS, CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT FOR STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO PARKING AND 153.067 OFF-STREET PARKING, STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND CIVIC/INSTITUTIONAL USES IN THE CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD), 3 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes — 06/03/2025 BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. ANDREW TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. Community Development Director Angela Schumann stated the consideration by City Council for the zoning ordinance amendment will be placed on the June 9, 2025 regular meeting agenda. 3. Regular Agenda None 4. Other Business A. Community Development Director's Report Community Development Director Angela Schumann gave an overview on the City Council actions related to Planning Commission recommendations, including the series of requests by Tamarack Development for The Meadows at Pioneer Park with recommendations by Planning Commission for denial of all three applications. The Council consent agenda for May 27, 2025 included the land use amendment as requested by Scannell Properties, the Red Rooster PUD amendment, and the CUP amendment for West Metro/Carcone, which were all approved per Planning Commission recommendation. Angela Schumann spoke to the proposed legislation for preemption on zoning, subdivision, and other housing -related matters, which did not pass in the 2024 session. She noted that it is likely that the House and Senate committees will revisit in a continuation at their next session. Angela Schumann provided an update on the Meadowbrook plat; the plat has been recorded and ground -breaking for phase one is underway. A previous Director's Report indicated that amendments relating to the outcomes of the housing workshop meeting held jointly with the EDA and Council would be brought forward for consideration by Commissioners. To verify staff has the correct information as discussed, an upcoming workshop to review the discussion notes and potential amendments will take place before the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting in July. Angela Schumann provided a brief overview of and referenced the link for full information on the Monticello Annual comprehensive Financial Report conducted by the City's auditing consultant and a project update through May 2025. Chair Tapper asked about a potential third carwash planned for development along Chelsea Avenue. Angela Schumann stated the development plans for the Big River Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes — 06/03/2025 445 PUD were conceptual, showing potential uses for the lots. She recalled one identified as a future carwash in the development stage of the PUD, which requires an amendment to the PUD and final stage of the PUD to come forward for Commission's consideration; nothing formal has been received to date to her knowledge. 5. Adjournment RICK KOTHENBEUTEL MOVED TO ADJOURN THE JUNE 3, 2025 REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:27 P.M. Recorded By: Anne Mueller Date Approved: July 1, 2025 ATIIEST: Angela Schunfarjn,(Corghmunity Development Director 5