Planning Commission Agenda 09-07-1999
.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, September 7,1999
Mem bers:
Dick Frie, Robbie Smith, Roy Popilek, Richard Carlson, Rod Dragsten
Council Liaison:
Clint Herbst
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held August 3, 1999.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
4. Citizens comments.
.
5. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for a Rezoning from R-I, Single Family to A-
0, Agricultural-Open Space District and a Conditional Use Permit within the A-O Zoning
District to allow a Golf Course and Club House. Applicant: Monticello Country Club.
6.
Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for a Final Planned Unit Development Permit
within the CCD Zoning District to allow a mixed use feed and retail operations.
Applicant: Little Mountain Feed.
7. Continued Public Hearing - Consideration of a zoning text amendment to allow eternal
illuminated projecting wall signs. Applicant: City of Monticello.
8. Public Hearing - Consideration of granting a conditional use permit allowing a small
expansion to a restaurant/bar. Applicant: Hawks Sports Bar and Grill.
9. Continued Public Hearing - Consideration of Concept and Development Stage
Residential Planned Unit Development Consisting of Five 12 Unit Apartments.
Applicant: Monticello Village Apartments.
10. Public Hearing - Consideration of Renewing the Interim Use Permit for the Monticello
Public Schools Turning Point ALP. Applicant: Monticello Public Schools.
11.
12.
. 13.
14.
Zoning Code Violations at Lots 6 and 7, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park.
Discussion on registering for the tele-conference session for the Y2 Plan Conference.
Consideration of signing up for the Annual Planning Association Conference.
Adjourn.
.
.
.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, August 3, 1999
Members Present:
Robbie Smith, Roy Popilek, Richard Carlson, Rod Dragsten
Staff Present:
Steve Grittman, Jeff O'Neill and Lori Kraemer
Members Absent:
Chair Dick Frie and Council Liaison Clint Herbst
1. Vice Chair Richard Carlson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held Julv 6. 1999.
ROBBIE SMITH MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 6, 1999
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. ROY POPILEK
SECONDED THE MOTION. Motion carried unanimously.
3.
Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
Roy Popilek asked Jeff O'Neill to update the commission regarding Morel Trucking.
This was placed under 12a. Rod Dragsten requested an update on Kjellberg which was
placed under I2b. Robbie Smith shared a concern regarding junk cars at Ken's Service on
Broadway/75.
4. Citizens comments.
There was no response from the audience.
5.
Consideration of a request for a review of a Concept Stage Planned Unit Development
and Concept Stage Office/Industrial/Regional Storm Water Pond development for two
parcels totaling approximatelv 11 acres in size. Applicant: Monticello Village
Apartments.
Monticello Village Apartments has applied for consideration of a residential Planned Unit
Development and adjacent office/industrial use. The submitted concept plans consist of two
parcels totaling approximately 11 acres located west of Minnesota Street, south of Ruff s
Auto, and east of Elm Street. The first stage of development would include the construction
of the residential PUD and regional storm water pond. Construction of the proposed
office/industrial building, regional stormwater ponding facilities and extension of 7th Street,
between Minnesota and Elm Streets, would occur as a second stage and would require a
-1-
Planning Commission Minutes 8/3/99
future rezoning.
Steve Grittman presented the staff report. Staff was asked to look into the development of
this particular site as well as concerns with screening of this site due to its proximity to the
Ruff Auto site. Steve noted that the residential phase of this development would stay further
east and the industrial component would be more in proximity to Ruff Auto. The main issue
would be to make sure the requirements of a bufferyard were met. Steve also stated that the
building spacing would need to be looked into, although the City does not have specific
guidelines pertaining to using building height as spacing and the developer would be
required to space the buildings out more. Steve will clarify with the developer the use of
possibly smaller garages.
.
Steve stated that the commercial/industrial piece is consistent with what staff has been
looking for as land use, the PZM site is appropriately zoned for office use. The
commissioners questioned the reimbursement for the storm water pond and Steve noted the
pond is a regional pond and therefore the developer would receive credits against the trunk
storm sewer fee for the pond. They also questioned the number of bedrooms in this proposed
apartment complex. Steve noted that these issues would come later in the development
stage. The commission also questioned the parcel to be split on 7th Street (remnant piece)
and they requested that the developer indicate conceptually what might happen with this
piece as they are looking for ideas from the developer that would be acceptable to staff.
Steve noted that because of the slope on this piece there may not be other options.
Richard Carlson opened the public hearing.
.
Brian Sullivan of RLK addressed the issues regarding the buffer between the proposed
residential site and Ruff Auto stating the use of the garages would be a visual screen. He
also addressed the issue of building spacing and noted they would like to spread the
buildings out but would also like to have leniency regarding encroachment. Mr. Sullivan
also noted that the developer would not be fully responsible for assessments for the proposed
extension of 7th Street. However, they would pay their share for the office/industrial potion
of the site.
Larry Pebbles, Coldwell Bankers, noted that spreading the buildings out would still allow
them to fit within the required setbacks with the exception of the decks which would hang
over approximately 5 feet. They could spread out two of the buildings but the other two
would be a little more difficult. Steve Grittman stated he thought this may be allowable for
encroachments.
Mr. Scott Hill, Monticello resident, asked if the pond abuts the property and is it a stand
alone or does it drain into the city storm sewer system. His concern was the possible runoff
from the Ruff Auto property into this pond and would it be adequately protected. Steve
Grittman stated he would look into this in detail.
Richard Carlson closed the public hearing.
.
-2-
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes 8/3/99
The commission commented on location of the garages listed as item #6 of the conditions
in Exhibit Z, noting this would really chop up the layout and the developers design would
make it a cleaner look. Mr. Sullivan pointed out that this design creates a good buffer to
Ruff Auto.
Vice Chair Carlson asked the developers if they were okay with the conditions stated. Mr.
Pebbles had a concern regarding zoning ofthe proposed apartments, but it was noted thatthis
is properly zoned. Steve also noted that this is a concept plan for a PUD and the next step
would be to get a detailed plan including drainage, utilities, etc.
Procedurally, the City should consider the PUD concept plan, making comments and
requirements for the developer's further planning. The review of the concept plan is for the
purpose of identifying issues in the design which would raise concern for the City. A PUD
project is assumed to be a departure from the zoning standards, but with a superior design
and development not likely through the strict application of those standards. Therefore, the
ultimate finding which the City must make is that the project design meets the intent of the
PUD ordinance. Following the concept plan review, the developer will need to apply for a
development stage PUD for both parcels.
ROY POPILEK MOVED AND ROBBIE SMITH SECONDED A MOTION TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PUD CONCEPT PLAN BASED ON A
FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT
OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PZM DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE
CONDITIONS LISTED IN EXHIBIT Z, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM #6.
Motion carried unanimously.
6.
Consideration of approval of the preliminary plat for Hart Blvd. addition.
Steve Grittman presented the staff report. As you may recall, some time ago with the
development of the River View Square Plat, there was a need to subdivide the River View
Square property from a parcel that included both land on the East side of East Co. Rd. 39 and
land on the West side of West Co. Rd. 39. The simple subdivision ofthis property which
was made which resulted in River Square on one side and a remnant parcel on the West side
of East Co. Rd. 39. This particular plat encompasses the remnant property. The parcels
identified on this plat are linked to adjoining parcels and become logical extensions of
neighboring lots. Ownership of this property is the City and it is expected that the City will
sell these small parcels, which are undevelopable, to the adjoining property owners. City
Staff recommends approval of the Hart Blvd. addition. Approval ofthis consideration of this
plat is truly a house-keeping matter.
Richard Carlson opened the public hearing and hearing no response, the hearing was closed.
ROD DRAGSTEN MOVED AND ROY POPILEK SECONDED A MOTION TO
APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE HART BOULEVARD. Motion
carried unanimously.
-3-
Planning Commission Minutes 8/3/99
7.
Consideration of a variance to the five foot set-back requirement for drive aisles. Aq:fumt .
PetersonlGrimsmo Funeral home.
Steve Grittman provided report. Planning Commission is asked to conduct a public hearing
and consider granting a variance to the drive aisle setback requirement along the Red's
Mobile side of the property. Proposal is to allow for 0 setback for expansion of the funeral
home. On the Red's Mobile side of property the site plan shows drive aisle that serves the
mortuary garages. This portion of the parking lot will be used by mortuary vehicles only
which means that there will be no head-in parking that would result in bumper overhang, and
no parallel parking that would result in door swing hanging over adjacent property. In
addition, area of the variance is roughly adjacent to the blank east wall of the Red's Mobile
building. A variance would bring the curb very close to the Red's mobile building wall and
maximize functional space. Requiring the setback would provide space for landscaping
which would break up the monotony of the blank wall but reduce area needed for
maneuvering vehicles.
The applicant has indicated that the variance is necessary to obtain reasonable use of the
property due to the configuration and location of the existing building. There is some
precedent supporting the variance. A few months ago, Thein Well company was given a
variance allowing the curb line to move adjacent to the lot line.
Vice Chair Richard Carlson passed the chair to Rod Dragsten and was seated in the audience
for the public hearing. Rod Dragsten opened the public hearing.
.
Mike Cyr, MLC Building and Remodeling, explained the vehicle/garage portion faces the
Red's Mobile. To make the best use of the property would be to get this variance. Mike also
talked of putting a fence along the curb in the open space area, approximately 30 feet from
the property line. Jeff O'Neill stated it should be noted that parking lots are different than
buildings in that with parking lots there would be possible overhang. The commission asked
about the number of stalls and Mike Cyr stated there would be four, all one depth.
Rod Dragsten closed the public hearing.
After further discussion, Mike Cyr stated the intent of the variance was the need for a five
foot setback, and it was noted that this area is restricted from turning.
ROBBIE SMITH MOVED AND ROY POPILEK SECONDED A MOTION TO
GRANT THE VARIANCE TO THE DRIVE AISLE SET-BACK REQUIREMENT.
THE LENGTH OF THE VARIANCE TO CORRESPOND WITH THE AREA
NEEDED FOR FUNERAL HOME VEHICLE MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF
GARAGES. ROD DRAGSTEN OPPOSED. Motion carried.
.
-4-
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes 8/3/99
8.
Consideration of a request for a Preliminary Plat. Rezoning to R-I and R-2. and Final Plat
for Groveland. a Mixed Use Development. Applicant: Ocello. LLC.
Steve Grittman presented the staff report noting that this project was reviewed and staff has
made a number of comments on the layout and design. The application has been revised in
a manner consistent with statf recommendations. The developer has re-worked the
intersection on the westerly side to create better access. ft was noted that Public Works
Director lohn Simolahad requested the developer investigate similar extension of the street
from the cul-de-sac and street, noting they would like consideration regarding the limiting
of cul-de-sacs. leffO'Neill asked about the Public Works Director's reason for moving the
cul-de-sac and it was noted that it is to avoid traffic cutting through from School Blvd. and
force it through Chelsea Rd. If the road were to be connected at this location it would make
it a high traffic area. Developer has been discussing the extension of Chelsea Road into the
development. Steve also noted the MOAA tinds that the property is appropriate for
annexation.
There was further discussion on the realignment of Chelsea Road which Steve stated we will
need to ask the developer to define this. Access point is also an issue and the developer
states they would work toward developing this phase to get the second access in as soon as
possible, noting there would be two accesses into this area in a short period oftime. Access
to Sandberg Road is still being worked on and the status has not yet been determined.
There was further discussion regarding the planning commission process and annexation.
Steve noted the MOAA finds that the property is appropriate for annexation It was
suggested that final plat and zoning not occur until after the MOAA has finalized the
annexation process. The commission asked that Steve approach the MOAA board with these
concerns and get a more defined process the board would like the planning commission to
follow. The planning commission also asked that they receive a formal written procedure
of a copy of the minutes regarding the parks commission recommendations.
As an additional point of information, one of the parcels (Little Mountain Partnership)
separating the Groveland Plat from the Chelsea Road connection, has been acquired by the
developer. There remains one last intervening parcel that remains to be acquired by the
City as part of the Highway 25 Project.
Richard Carlson opened the public hearing. Tony Emmerich, Groveland Developer, stated
he is satisfied with the staff s tindings and conditions listed. Regarding the OAA issue, it
appears to be resolved. Mr. Emmerich also stated that technically they applied for
annexation a year ago to get this development started. He also noted that Little Mountain
Partnership has signed the deeds.
The public hearing was closed. There was further discussion by the commissioners
regarding the power line that goes through this development across the lots. It was clarified
that the setback is from the street to the power line and the power line easement is a full
distance of the pole, there is no portion of a house within this area (75 feet on either side).
-5-
Planning Commission Minutes 8/3/99
ROD DRAGSTEN MOVED AND ROBBIE SMITH SECONDED A MOTION TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GROVELAND, .
A MIXED USED DEVELOPMENT, BASED ON A FINDING THA T THE LAND USE
PATTERN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,
SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN EXHIBIT Z. RICHARD CARLSON
VOTED YES WITH ROY POPILEK VOTING IN OPPOSITION. Motion carried.
Rezoning to R-l and R-2
ROBBIE SMITH MOVED AND ROD DRAGSTEN SECONDED A MOTION TO
TABLE ACTION OF THE REZONING, SUBJECT TO RESOLUTION OF
OTHER PLAT ISSUES. Motion carried unanimously.
Final Plat for Phase 1 of Groveland
ROBBIE SMITH MOVED AND ROD DRAGSTEN SECONDED A MOTION TO
TABLE ACTION OF THE FINAL PLAT, SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND
APPROVAL OF ANNEXATION BY MOAA BOARD OR SUBJECT TO
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Motion carried unanimously.
9. Public Hearin!} - Consideration ofa sign variance request for oerpendicular professional sign.
Applicant: Metcalf. Larson. & Muth.
Jeff O'Neill presented the staff report stating the City was looking into a sign ordinance and
the DA T has been working on establishing a code regarding projecting signs in the
downtown area. There is a problem with consistency regarding this particular sign, and
therefore a need for a variance. The applicant states the need for the sign to be relatively
high in order to be seen, as well as it would also compliment the building.
.
Initially the DAT found that the sign proposed for the building at 313 West Broadway
appeared to be consistent with the Monticello Downtown and Riverfront Revitalization Plan
and recommended that the Sign Ordinance be amended to allow such signs. However, the
City Council and DA T have since recognized that a change in the City Sign Ordinance to
allow this sign would likely establish a precedent for similar signs, some of which may be
aesthetically objectionable.
DA T is now recommending that this application for variance be considered on its own, and
that the attached ordinance amendment be considered for action at the September 1999
meeting of the Planning Commission.
Richard Carlson opened the public hearing. Mr. Scott Hill, a resident, noted that the City
would need to grant variances to all properties in this area if this particular applicant was
granted a variance.
The public hearing was closed.
.
-6-
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes 8/3/99
The planning commission's recommendation is for all downtown businesses to be
approached by DA T for ideas. Also, if the Metcalf Larson sign is acceptable, the ordinance
should be written allowing the sign without a variance.
ROBBIE SMITH MOVED AND ROY POPILEK SECONDED A MOTION TO
T ABLE THE VARIANCE UNTIL MORE INFORMATION IS RECEIVED. Motion
carried unanimously.
After further discussion regarding electronic reader boards,
ROD DRAGSTEN MOVED AND ROY POPILEK SECONDED A MOTION FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING TO BE SET FOR SEPTEMBER 7,1999 REGARDING AN
ORDINANCE FOR ELECTRONIC READER BOARDS. Motion carried
unanimously.
10.
Tattoo and Bod
Monticello has been discussing the adoption of regulations for tattoo parlor uses. These uses
create two issues of public concern. The tirst is a land use matter focused upon appropriate
locations for such uses. The second issue relates to public health and safety concerning the
potential to spread disease. Other communities have addressed these issues through their
wning and licensing powers. An annotated bibliography of research sources regarding the
content coverage and control of tattoo parlors and body piercing establishments has been
prepared and attached as Exhibit A to this report.
From a zoning perspective, tattoo parlors are considered commercial operations. Based on
previous research, there is a lack of documentation or support for an approach to regulating
these uses as sensitive uses that must be separated from other uses to avoid negative impacts
(i.e. adult uses). Rather, these uses are basic service businesses, much like a barber shop or
beauty parlor, which are appropriate in commercial zoning districts. Not allowing the uses
in the City is also an option. However, this approach may only serve to create
"underground" uses and also forfeits the City's opportunity to closely regnlate tattoo parlors
through a licensing requirement in the City Code. Therefore, the intent of protecting the
public health and safety may be better served by a combination of allowing the uses in
specific Zoning Districts and licensing requirements.
In considering the existing Zoning Districts established in the Zoning Ordinance, our office
would recommend making tattoo parlors and body piercing establishments a permitted use
in the B-4 Regional Business District. As a commercial use, body piercing establishments
or tattoo parlors have no unique characteristics that would require a conditional use. The B-4
District is most appropriate for the use given the broad range of uses allowed within the
District and its anticipated trade area potential. These same considerations make including
these uses in more limited neighborhood commercial districts less appropriate, in part due
to potential greater access by minors. A Zoning Ordinance amendment making tattoo parlors
and body piercing establishments a permitted use in the B-4 District has been prepared and
-7-
attached as Exhibit B.
Planning Commission Minutes 8/3/99
The primary concern with tattoo parlors and bOdy piercing estab lisbments is the potential to
spread disease and negatively effect public health and safety. A secondary concern is also
to restrict access to these businesses by minors due to the heath aspects and pennanency of
tattoos and/or piercing. The operation of businesses related to tbese issues are best regulated
through a City's licensing powers.
.
An amendment to the City Code has been prepared (Exhibit C) based upon Minnesota State
Department of Health and Family Service regulations, Minneapolis Division of
Environmental Health, similar regulations of other local communities, as well as the
Association of ProfessiOnal Piercers. The proposed City Code amendment addresses the
following issues, which cover the public health concerns of tattoo and piercing uses.
1. Training of the operator.
2. Verification of sanitation procedures.
3. Identification of safety precautions and customer screening.
4. Identification of facilities and equipment.
The licenSing amendment establishes procedures for application, conditions under which the
license application may be denied, violation penalties and general operation conditions and
requirements. Approved licenses wonld be valid until December 31 st of the year in which
the it was issues. Thus, a new inspection would be required with each application for
renewal. The license Provisions wilJ be administered by the City. However, the code does
provide that the City may designate an outside representative or agency for the investigative
duties (i. e ., Wright County). As such, the application requires three fees, an application fee,
an investigation fee, which would Cover any costs for inspections and an license fee. Staff
is still coordinating the inspection issue with Wright County Public Health Staff.
.
Richard Carlson opened the public hearing. Heating 00 response, the public hearing
was closed. There was discussion by the Commission regarding the location of the B4
distric~ general business district, and it Was stated that this area is located near School Blvd.
and Highway 25, possibly inclnding Chelsea Road, and there is land available for this type
of use.
ROY POPILEK MOVED AND ROD DRAGSTEN SECONDED A MOTION TO
APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE ALLOWING
BODY PIERCING ESTABLISHMENTS AND TATTOO PARLORS AS A
PERMITTED USE IN THE B-4 DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO ANY FURTHER
COMMENTS OF WRIGHT COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH, THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OR CITY COUNCIL. Motion carried unanimously.
.
-8-
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes 8/3/99
11.
Consideration of a revised preliminary plat for Rolling Woods Subdivision.
Jeff O'Neill provided the staff report noting the preliminary plat for the Rolling Woods
subdivision was approved by the Planning Commission and later also approved by the City
Council. The approval was contingent on approval of a Wetland Mitigation Plan. Due to
input from the Wright County Soil and Conservation District regarding the Wetland
Mitigation Plan, there has been a need to slightly revise the preliminary plat. The revisions
made to the plat are relatively small and do not, in staffs opinion, call for a new public
hearing, however, staff believes it to be significant enough to bring it before the Planning
Commission for an update.
One of the major changes to the plat calls for realignment of the road system which will
result in the placement of the parkland adjacent to a wetland area which will result in the
connection of these two open spaces, thus making the park feel bigger than it really is.
The Parks Commission was given the opportunity to review the new park layout and is
comfortable with the new plan. As a final note, the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area
reviewed the preliminary plat at a recent meeting and indicated support for annexation of this
parcel.
Mr. John Bogart, Rolling Woods Development, displayed a revised version of the plans.
He pointed out that the park was moved immediately adjacent to the wetland and that this
is simply an improvement, adding water quality ponds which adds more green space. There
are no drainage issues and the lots have stayed the same.
ROBBIE SMITH MOVED AND ROD DRAGSTEN SECONDED A MOTION FIND
THA TTHE REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT IS SUBST ANTIALL Y CONSISTENT
WITH THE ORIGINAL PLAT. REVISIONS ARE HEREBY RECOMMENDED
FOR APPROV ALAND NO ADDITIONAL PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING TillS
PRELIMINARY PLAT IS NEEDED. Motion carried unanimously.
12. Discussion regarding the rezoning of the PS zone to include schools. churches and parks
Jeff O'Neill provided the staff report stating the need to clean up our City codes. The High
School and Little Mountain Elementary School were left in the R zone because the R district
rules state you can put a school in an R district. Defining the codes would give better
definition when looking at a map, narrows down the uses, allows to identify a certain part
of the codes, and also adds clarity and would match land uses.
Steve Grittman stated the intent of the PIPS district was to get control of the uses and zone
for the uses as they came up. The concern is that if changes are not made now, the City may
run into problems later, noting there is value in making these changes. Jeff O'Neill stated
that the City is looking for advise from planning commission to look at the ordinance, zoning
map amendments, etc.
-9-
Planning Commission Minutes 8/3/99
There was continued discussion that any new church would have to come to the planning
commission first and the City would zone existing churches as PIPS. ft was also noted that
if the City continued to allow churches in R zones there will be a sprawl of churches in these
zones. The City could look at locations from a strategic standpoint once someone approaches
the planning commission for a proposed site. The City would need a public hearing for
amending ordinances for rezoning.
.
No action was taken.
12a. Update on MOTTel Trucking
The commission asked for an update on the Morrel Trucking issued regarding a letter that was
to be sent. Jeff O'Neill stated that they have not been able to get out there but they will put
this matter back on the agenda. Jeff stated the City wants to account for all violations, etc.
and that information has not yet been compiled so a letter has not been sent out. Staff still
needs to prioritize the needs to be done, items that are important to the neighbor.
12b. Kiellberg Update
Jeff O'Neill stated that Kjellberg had gone to the OAA Board requesting for R-2 zoning and
that they did adopt a plan that calls for this area to be medium density residential which is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The City is waiting for Kjellberg to take the
next step. We still have the say on whether annexation occurs. Kjellberg's roads are not built .
to City standards as roads in mobile home parks are not city streets. The new project
anticipates hooking up to School Blvd.
12c. Blights
Robbie Smith asked about a blight issue, especially a gas station on Broadway which
seems to be an ongoing problem. Jeff O'Neill explained that because this particular station
was grand fathered in, there is not much the City can do to eliminate the problem of the
number of cars being parked in this lot.
ADJOURN
ROY POPILEK MOVED AND ROBBIE SMITH SECONDED A MOTION TO
ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:45 P.M.. Motion carried.
Lori Kraemer, Recording Secretary
.
-10-
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda -09107/99
5.
Consideration of a request for a Rezoning from R-l. Single Familv to A-D.
Agricultural-Ooen Soaee District and a Conditional Use Permit within the A-D Zonin!!
District to allow a Golf Course and Club House. Applicant: Monticello Country Club.
(NAC)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Monticello Country Club is requesting a rezoning of its golf course property to A-D,
Agricultural-Open Space to re-establish the club as a conforming use, and facilitate the
expansion of the club house by Conditional Use Permit. The expansion consists of a two-
level addition which includes lower level access to the golf course from a new pro shop, and
kitchen, lounge, and banquet facilities on the upper level. The request also includes the
construction of a new maintenance building adjacent to 1-94 and County Highway 39.
The A-O District sets certain standards for Golf Course or Country Club Conditional Use
Permits. These include a requirement that no more than 5% of the property is covered by
buildings and that appropriate buffering is considered where adjacent to residential uses. The
Monticello Country Club is in conformance with the general performance standards.
However, there are a few issues which will need to be addressed to accommodate the
expansion and the increased activity which the expansion will create.
First, the parking area should be expanded appropriately. The City's zoning ordinance does
not have specific standards for golf courses. Common standards apply a parking req uirement
based entirely on the number of holes (six spaces per hole is typical) to a standard based on
the combination of golf and restaurant use (four spaces per hole, plus 50% of the
requirements for other uses). The 6/hole standard results in a requirement of 108 spaces.
The 4/hole plus other uses standard results in a requirement of 118 spaces. The site plan
does not indicate the number of spaces available in the existing lot, but the area shown would
appear to accommodate about 70 spaces. Staff will have an actual count in preparation for
the public hearing. Because of the increased activity, staff would recommend an expansion
of the parking area, including concrete curb as required for other commercial parking areas.
Also as noted above, the Conditional Use Permit provisions require buffering from adjacent
residential uses. A landscape plan is not included in the submission packet. In order to
conform to the requirements of the CUP, staff would recommend that a landscape plan is
prepared which illustrates a plant material buffer between the commercial activity areas of
the club house and maintenance bui ldings from the residential deveIopmentto the southeast.
.
Planning Commission Agenda -09/07/99
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Decision 1: Rezoning from R-l to A-O, Agricultural-Open Space
1. Motion to approve the rezoning from R-l to A-O, based on a finding that the golf
course better meets thei ntent of this district, and that the future land use of this area
is better protected by an A-a Zoning designation.
2. Motion to deny the rezoning, based on a finding that the club house use IS
incompatible with the surrounding residential area.
3. Motion to table action on the rezoning, subject to additional information.
Decision 2: Conditional Use Permit for a Golf Course in an A-O Zoning District
1. Motion to approve the CUP, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z, based on a
finding that the proposal meets the standards applicable to this use.
2.
Motion to deny the CUP, based on a finding that the additional activity IS
incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
.
3. Motion to table action on the CUP, subject to additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning and the CUP. The golf course is a permanent
use ofland in this location, and the A-a Zoning District is best adapted to accommodating
the land use. Moreover, the A-a District emphasizes the open space nature of the land use,
and best protects the City from less attractive land uses. The Comprehensive Plan calls for
a continuation of the current land use pattern, and this rezoning would support that objective.
The CUP is also recommended for approval, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z.
These conditions are designed to help the site conform to the City's development standards,
and mitigate the negative impacts on adjacent residential land which could occur from the
increased level of activity created by the expansion.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
,
Exhibit A - Building Floor Plan
Exhibit B - Building Elevation
Exhibit C ~ Site Plan
Exhibit Z - Conditions of CUP Approval
.
.
1-
!IC""
4J
"...1-0'
"
,~.".
:r.:~' ,......" ,... ,...... 2''''''1'
,-1;1 " ." -".-.,
,
'" ,..oc~'.,I ".,. n:""'; .~'-,..
c-.)'
c-a'
c.".
- ,
,
a'" '-~..._.~~~O-.--~I-----''Q .----------~
/ oe~1I( AeQ'..1! .........J
/il
~~,JJ
//
u/ :c'-b'
.~I'-"\!"'!!-".$...
l"II~~""'~I~ ~..
"
\ .
~;,i"
'-' I
.-.;.
CF"'~ ~
-.v ....;~.
T
~
~
I
~
.
'"
~~~
r ,~':~ ',,~~:~-,~
\" _ ,-a'~~, ',/!!t _tI"I.I.,...X,(
(~.~~.~~.u ~~7~ J"" "'""','"'"
~ ""'.......::..."'C':I
""~'- =.. """1' '.. ~'"' '
1I"~"\o""~ i :':I..~~- ~
~~ ~Il ,'....~7:~...7~., '-' 'r";'
L'=i-'o?~ ~r:: I - ~
) ,i ! ___ = ~ ,.~~ ~--~ rc'~ ~
/ I ~5~' ....1
/ :1' - -. - - -, "
, Ii ~~.e"lt I
4
!l
\")P
~
f!'<'~":" I ~C<.!'~5 I
T=I.........~C....'5
,
,.
I
4
....-a'f.~!"1oO)
"....
,/,?\ LoO..;!::=< ~~ <'5_ =_A',;
t
'. ~ - j ~.........:' IP-. -C'
~
1~-6'
.,~...'
"'.""
,
,.......:J"."OI~
...... -t!'- ..!'-=,~-
...... ..; .........
6'....
._~ .....
!~~'
lII.:!o..~
i
' 1
.~~.
~
~
= ~>
~"
~>:~~.. . ,I"-~-___~_='c,
~.~~
\;'
""
~.
~
/ ~'J ~~~e
, J ,-
P 7\ --,~IJ-: 1-"'-, ~"u -: ~';;~c~~~' '
I ~ I ~=_,. r..,' \
I T::L.- G 8 ' I -, I
: ",,,,:!j. -~- ~-_ _J ~
1 ~~~~~~j--~--~.LL--,~":-~ i _~__
'------------- ~'''''~ 19 I '" ".,-'" ~.." _____u "'-"~- II
. , .- , . , , u> "'-, <.~ 'I :
-,0""'__ ~ ~r // :-.,~..;~-:--~'''~'~~; 'I "'-... "lA -'~ _____---~....... ,
("wI,JI.~~...:...q~l~j~ ~=;(:!!I~'~~IC~:....<.- 1'-'5',/;"... ~~ .....
.....~./'f ./
Y
'}\
~
I".
: ~.
.6
.
.. iC'....~.
~
~.
,
".~
~'-j' !Jr.~:""'c).
').
,
"
4
'.-1
,....--:::-...,,
-"-~~^~~~---~_::::/;: "--=-.~.":,,,-
J...:,. !!-...:,,>,--= '."'.. _."
..".
boO'" 11
'T'.QfI..I ~,..
<'CC'<
~
.
\-:=
F
I
.:sA
"-~:'
0'
~
~
i
I
I
I
"I
., ,
~
,
" ~
".
~-""
""-
-~
;..L--,-
- ==- .
~o..:;
\
\
.~-"~_.
\
~
~
~-~~..__.-
Exhibit A .. Floor Plans
L~:"~n____~
..
xr~',
'r~
..~
-,
n.'
&::;! 15' C""'~-
~
H'
__t=-.' _ ~ .'...... /
~
..":=---.
~
, ! I
I............. 'oJ#' I.:C ,
1
,/~. --~~--..! -":,~ ,/
,
.,
"'.".
.
.
.
e.a:!!I.1'-~:aA.-="'1iod
1IC')'oI'OL'l..:)I!'od
. ,~ ." :~ ~ ,- ~ ,~
""
"
....""'.w "I. '" ..'II':'"
".'o(Y'"...~""'~
~l~~""""""
~-,...,~
,.,.
, 0"
(1\ =0'..-... i'~E"'~-O'
~ ~~, '/O'''\'~.
!.V;:!lrlioJl5 s..~l,..:I!Jod
~!L:l..=11oo6
. 74aJ(
~.._".
'.~~.. '",.-' . .~.. --~.,~_..
~""'-~""I~
~}III,.t!r-'~
,~.'-
~,-- ...."
~"l'
"...
~~ -".....:. ~- .
""-.,' -.
':.ol
CD [0 [[] [[] OJ rn
!l~;'IO'~
,.,'
", art
,
I
~
~... >: "'1'\01
"""" "'- I
nlDJ; rn CO
~ ,-c' ,,"-C' ....~
~~~:..
~~~"
'-C' ".':.,~ "J
I~,W/,-,!,~
(:\ 'O~-... E~="'~ .,0"'-
~ K~""".".oC'
r--' ~, ~
'!ot+f~ b, '/~
.'.-,,;-.~.~..:,~:~.;..~_c ":' .. "-.
,~:,;,~,<:_"" .,=..0'''' -'"''''
~....:,~
,.. "..,
%'~'J'
0,<
OJ
~,,~
:.....:!!I~. l"C'''''' ......
DC]
""-C'~
Y"\.f""'_
'r'U1'oJ:"('
7-<7
/ ct'.
J
--------- ~~ ,.,~'~ -
,~ -~ --
(?\ I,.,=_~- =_=.....~,..,;O'"
\......~_~/ ~....~ 11~"".c'
~:.&- E_E-...:.'tiO~
~ ;.c~, 1/6'.'"oC'
56
Exhibit B - Building Elevations
~ " " ~ -,- " "- ,- " "
\/1 i \ I- - I I
. I '. " ~ '- / l..- L L '- /
./ " " " t\ -,- r "- , I ~7J " " I r "
i \ f- (' Y " I f- .<:,
'- " '- / '- / " }J1 . "- " L '- / L --'
"-.J
~'.l5~
-~ P'Jr~~
~--j -=
r----;
I
- ----.E;';T.~,'~E-
,----'-.----.-'- -- -
.-
,,-
/
/
(
I
[
I
I
"
I
I
I
I
I 3C
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------------------~ ~
\
\
\
\
EXI6T1f',;S
PARKINS LOT
~
~
-?S-
~
~
\
....
....
()C)
(--.,., ';'--y-:--, -~~O
,.J ~~""";J.~~}t C)
.,.-..., ~~.~
i J' ~
'-..--' ,,--'"
".
\
o
\
~-~
~~
l~
"';;';
-~
,.~--..~
\-..--'~
-n~
*'1'
~~
~;;
~
.... ".... I I '" I -.- r" \ ,
1'111\1
~, ..... ... ~ I ~ I I \ ,
"7~
.
,.... ;..... j ~... ~r-
I I II '1'("
..............., \
i
~o
co
,..-,
g
.5'57
C-UUNTY
HI6HWAY
NO.
'?5
- :':'~;t. ,.~. ,'::-: :;~,,_' ~:.,~.::-:~:::=_:.. j:!/~
-::' "_'.' ::,.., ;:; -;-0,. '
. ..~. f
........,.....:= c::.~\. ,1::=
~ --- "~
:-:=. .~ \
'" 11.7 .-=.
-::-. ,_'j ~,4 - ;~ I ,;~ ~~E =)~:S~:\(:~ :>):_:'):~/h
,/, ,.\:5 :;~~ \J~:-} ~~'-~? j ':"\, ,~=~,>l~ :"':--~~",
\~- , .... ;..;:'::--::..',~~\'\/,-l,-=
.
......-
5v
Exhibit C .. Site Plan
.
Exhibit Z - Conditions of CUP Approval - Monticello Country Club
1. Compliance with all performance standards of the City's Zoning Ordinance,
including parking lot development.
2. Review and approval of a drainage plan by the City Engineer.
3. Expansion of the parking lot to a minimum of 108 spaces, as recommended in this
report.
4. Submission of a landscaping plan which buffers the neighboring residential
development ("Monticello Country Club Court") from the parking area and the
maintenance building activity, in conformance with the City's landscaping and
buffering requirements.
.
.
Exhibit Z - Conditions of Approval
5D
.
.
,
Planning Commission Agenda -09/07/99
6.
Consideration of a request for a Final Planned Unit Development Permit within the
CCD Zoning District to allow a mixed use feed and retail operation. Avplicant: Little
Mountain Feed. (NAC)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Little Mountain Feed has applied for a final PUD approval to allow for the expansion of their
facility between Linn and Maple Streets, north of the Burlington Northern Railroad. The
applicant has shifted the building slightly to the north from the original approvaL This
change allows him to concentrate the truck and forklift activity to the east, resulting in less
of an impact on the residential property adjacent to the north boundary of the site.
The applicant is requesting that employee parking continue to be located on the gravel area
adjacent to Linn Street. As a part of the original PUD discussions, the applicant has been
permitted to expand the operation in phases to minimize the economic impacts on the
business. Retaining an unpaved parking area for employees may be approved as a part of the
PUD, however, staff would recommend some delineation of spaces to maintain a clear
parking area, and avoid confusion between parked cars and other vehicles. These interim
improvements could include a raised chain "fence" with tags suspended in front of each
space, and concrete curb bumpers in front of each space as welL In this way, employees
should be able to discern the location of each parking space without paving and striping.
It is also recommended that a time limit be established by development agreement which
would mandate an improved parking area by a certain date. A period of two years would be
appropriate, or when the applicant seeks another expansion prior to the two year period.
With regard to customer parking adjacent to the retail area, the applicant shows 12 spaces
to be paved, striped, and curbed in accordance with the ordinance. This area would actually
require approximately 25 spaces, depending on the amount of floor space which is used for
storage or material handling (as opposed to retail floor space). The City has the flexibility
to permit a parking supply lower than the ordinance requirement in the CCD District, based
on an agreement in which the applicant contributes to a public parking fund. The parking
lot to be provided should meet standards, however. In this case, the applicant has proposed
that the curb line be located on the property line, with a landscaped screen on the adjacent
railroad easement (also the City's right-of-way). There is adequate room on this plan to meet
the 5 foot setback, and provide the landscaping on the applicant's own property.
Finally, the site plan shows an eight foot high property line fence along the north side of the
site. The remaining 25 feet is to be landscaped, and serve as a buffer to the residential area
to the north. Due to its height, it may be preferable to locate the fence five feet from the
property line, and provide a landscaped buffer outside of the fenced area to mitigate the
impact on the residential area. To illustrate this plan, as well as other site landscaping, the
.
Planning Commission Agenda -09107/99
applicant must submit a detailed landscape plan indicating the type and sizes of all plant
materials, including groundcovers and sod. The Zoning Ordinance provides a list of required
sizes, and other guidance for the development of the landscape plan..
An additional issue is the proposed exterior grai n bin which would be added to the south side
of the existing building. The bin is a metal structure, apparently 34 feet high, based on the
information submitted by the applicant. Staff is concerned about the visual impacts of the
site from the Commtmity Center property south of the railroad. This issue should be
addressed with regard to screening and landscaping to improve the aesthetics, if it is to be
permitted.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Motion to recommend approval of the final stage PUD, subject to the conditions in
Exhibit Z, and based on a finding that the proposal meets the intent of the CCD
District and the previous Development Stage PUD approval.
2.
Motion to recommend denial of the final stage PUD, based on a finding that the
proposal is incompatible with the long term future land use of the area.
.
3. Motion to table action on the final stage PUD, subject to the submission of additional
information.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDA nON
Staffbelieves that the submissions is generally consistent with the Development Stage PUD.
However, there is missing information in this submittal which is important to meeting the
intent of the CCD and the original approval. Primarily, a landscaping plan has not been
submitted which shows how the open spaces on the site will be planted, except some sketch
markings which illustrate trees or shrubs in a few of the areas. The Zoning Ordinance calls
for a detailed plan as noted in the report. Moreover, staff is concerned about the visual
impacts of the bin area as noted in this report.
.
.",';"
Other unresolved issues include the unpaved employee parking area, and the shortfall of
parking supply for the retail building. The PUQ allows for flexibility in these areas, but not
without some assurance that the problems which may be caused by the non-conforming plan
will be addressed. Staff recommends that if the final PUD is approved, the pun Permit is
accompanied by a condition that the unpaved parking stalls are marked (as recommended in
this report), that a time limit is placed to mandate paving and striping in accordance with the
Ordinance, and that the insufficient parking for the retail space is quantified and addressed
as allowed within the CCD District for public parking.
. Planning Commission Agenda -09/07/99
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Site Plan
Exhibit B - Grain Bin Photo
Exhibit Z - Conditions of Approval
.
.
-
.
~, ,r
'~.~'.'-
.
.~
~-
----.......
.......
~ .......~
------ - ~ ~s -- _____
~ -- _____ __ 1Vtv1, ~
------ .
l-J 0 p.. -r1-\
.....
--
--
~
!
&;~
.t
~
if
~ff
~
$
$
.......
.....
----.......
l.oA
Exhibit A - Site Plan
F-':-.5..M::~~ '.
1"
",~.
.
..
~
I'
....,.
'".. ~ '.
"Bulk Storage Systems"
.
; ~ ~- ' .""
.'" "-'.' "'R-
..~~.
'~;;
]li'
~(f";
rr i~.
,I..
,,:I'-~
.
:==='1-
--_.;
~.__.
~ ,', -~~r.Ih~_.~~
'''';,.:-'<~':-~,,;'':':'::)-,'''lIifl.l~ ~
--- -, - ." _,.~~:.r.l or.
.
'-
PRECISION SOYA
Olivia, Minnesota
TOM-GIN METALS product line
also includes Bulk Seed Storage
and Processing Bins. Individual
bins, to multiple bin groupings of
nearly any size and configuration,
are available. This bin grouping
includes (4) 8' x 24' X 34' side-
wall, 5250 Bu. bulk storage bins
with (1) 8' X 16' cull bin. TOM-CIN
METALS also provides misc.
fittings, spouts, surge hoppers
and gates to these projects.
NOVARTIS
SEEDS, INC
Paris, Illinois
This bulk storage system includes
(12) 8'x 24' bins @ 7700 Bu.,
,(26) 8' x 16' bins @ 5140 Bu., and
(26) 8' x 8' bins @ 2565 Bu. for
a total of 292,730 Bu. capacity.
16'-0" x 48'-0" sheller building
structural steel and 20'.0" x 80'.0"
load-out structural steel by
TOM-CIN METALS.
P. 0. Box 256, 320 Industrial Park Ave., Hortonville, WI 54944
(800)343-3404 Phone: (920)779-4277 Fax: (920)779-6980
www.tom-cinmetals.com
Lob
Exhibit B .. Grain Bin Photo
.
Exhibit Z - Conditions of pun Approval - Little Mountain Feed
1. Submission of a Landscape Plan illustrating the detailed planting of all trees, shrubs,
and groundcovers on the site.
2. Landscaping Plan should address screening of the bin area from the south, planting
between the north fence ffi1d the neighboring property line, and ensuring that all
planting is on the applicant's property.
3. Redesign of the retail parking area to meet the five foot setback for curb line, and
compensation for CCD Parking fund based on required parking calculation.
4. Addition ofa chain fence and concrete curb bumpers for any employee parking areas
which are not paved at this time.
5. Limitation of unpaved parking areas for no more than two years from the date ofthe
PUD Permit approval.
6. Review and comments from other City Staff.
.
.
-
Exhibit Z - Conditions of pun Approval
&;v
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/07/99
7.
Public Hearing: -- Consideration of a zoning text amendment to allow externally
illuminated proiectin~ wall signs.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
The Design Advisory Team for the City has recently considered projecting wall signs in
the Central Community District. The Monticello Downtown and Riverfront
Revitalization Plan encourages the design and installation of projecting signs of up to 6
square feet so long as the signs do not project more than 12" over the public sidewalk..
Currently the Monticello Zoning Ordinance does not recognize the CCD District for the
purposes of signs. In addition, the Downtown and Riverfront Revitalization Plan Design
Guidelines are inconsistent with the general regulations of the Zoning Code which
specifically prohibits projecting signs. The attached suggested amendments would allow
externally illuminated projecting wall signs only in the Central Community District.
Such signs would have to be erected at least 8 feet above grade and must not exceed 6
square feet in area. (See Ordinance Attached.)
Pam Campbell, Chair of the DAT will provide examples of projecting signs allowed in
other cities.
B. ALTERNATIVES
1. Motion to recommend to the City Council that the ordinance amendment allowing
projecting wall signs in the CCD District be approved.
2. Motion to recommend to the City Council that the ordinance amendment allowing
projecting wall signs in the CCD District be denied.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommends Alternate 1 above.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
.
Copy of proposed Ordinance with strike-out and underlining to
show amendments.
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 2-2, ITEM [PI]; TITLE
10, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3-9, ITEM [B] 2. (k); AND, TITLE 10, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3-
9, ITEMS [E] 2.; OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING
SIGN REGULA nONS.
THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOES ORDAIN:
Title 10, Chapter 2, Section 2-2, Item [PI] ofthe City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
[PI] PROJECTING SIGN: A sign, other than a wall sign, which is affixed to a
building and which extends perpendicular from the building walL including but
not limited to overhanging signs.
Title 10, Chapter 3, Section 3-9, Item [B] 2. (k) of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
(k) Overhanging Proiecting Signs except as hereinafter provided.
Title 10, Chapter 3, Section 3-9, Items [E] 2. of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
2. Within the PZM, B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4, CCD, I-I, and 1-2 districts,
signs are subject to the following size and type regulations:
(a) Within the PZM and B-1 districts, the maximum allowable
square footage of sign area per lot shall not exceed the sum
of one (I) square foot per front foot of the building plus one
(1) square foot for each front foot of lot not occupied by a
building, up to one hundred (100) square feet. Each lot will
be allowed one (I) pylon or freestanding sign and one (1)
wall sign or two (2) wall signs total.
(b)
For buildings in which there is one (I) or two (2) business
uses within the B-2, B-3, B-4, CCD, I-I, and 1-2 districts,
and for buildings used for commercial retail activities
located within a PZM district and located on property
'lA
.
.
.
-
adjacent to B-2, B-3, B-4, ceD. I-I, or 1-2 districts, there
shall be two (2) options for permitted signs, as listed below
in 2.(b)i. And 2.(b)ii. The property owner shall select one
option, which shall control sign development on the
property.
1.
Option A. Under Option A, only wall signs shall be
allowed. The maximum number of signs on any
principal building shall be six sign boards or
placards, no more than four (4) of which may be
product identification signs. Signs may be
displayed on at least two walls, or equal to the
number of streets upon which the property has legal
frontage, whichever is greater. Each wall shall
contain no more than two product identification
signs and two business identification signs. The
total maximum area of wall signs shall be
determined by taking twenty percent (20%) of the
gross silhouette area of the front of the building up
to three hundred (300) square feet, whichever is
less. If a principal building is on a corner lot, the
largest side of the building may be used to
determine the gross silhouette area.
For purposes of determining the gross area of the
silhouette of the principal building, the silhouette
shall be defined as that area within an outline
drawing of the principal building as viewed from
the front lot line or from the related public street(s).
11.
Option B. Under Option B, a combination of wall
signs and a maximum of one (1) pylon sign may be
utilized. The total number of business identification
signs allowed (whether wall or pylon) shall be at
least two (2), or equal to the number of streets upon
which the property has legal frontage, whichever is
greater. Only two product identification signs shall
be allowed, and these wall signs may be only on one
wall. The total maximum allowable sign area for
any wall shall be determined by taking ten percent
(10%) ofthe gross silhouette area of the front of the
building up to one hundred (100) square feet,
'It>
.
whichever is less. The method for determining the
gross silhouette area shall be as indicated in Subd.
2.(b )i. Above. Pylon signs shall be regulated as in
Subd. 4 below. For single or double occupancy
business structures, the total maximum allowable
signage on the property shall be three hundred (300)
square feet. For multiple occupancy structures, the
total maximum allowable signage on the property
shall be as determined under Subd. 3 below.
(#272, 06/26/95)
(#230,06/22/92)
(#247,03/14/94)
(#265, 12/12/94)
3. Conditional Uses in Commercial and Industrial Districts: The
purpose of this section is to provide aesthetic control to signage
and to prevent a proliferation of individual signs on buildings with
three (3) or more business uses. The City shall encourage the use
of single sign boards, placards, or building directory signs.
.
(a)
In the case of a building where there are three (3) or more
business uses, but which, by generally understood and
accepted definitions, is not considered a shopping center or
shopping mall, a conditional use shall be granted to the
entire building in accordance with an overall site plan under
the provisions of Option A or Option B (described in 2 (b) i
and ii above) provided that:
1. The owner of the building files with the Zoning
Administrator a detailed plan for signing illustrating
location, size in square feet, size in percent of gross
silhouette area, and to which business said sign is
dedicated.
11.
No tenant shall be allowed more than one sign,
except that in the case of a building that is situated
in the interior of a block and having another
building on each side of it, one sign shall be
allowed on the front and one sign shall be allowed
on the rear provided that the total square footage of
the two signs does not exceed the maximum
allowable square footage under Option A or Option
B described in 2 (b) i and ii above.
.
7U
. Ill. No individual business sign board/placard shall
exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total
allowable sign area.
IV. An owner of the building desiring any alteration of
signs, sign location, sign size, or number of signs
shall first submit an application to the Zoning
Administrator for an amended sign plan, said
application to be reviewed and acted upon by the
Zoning Administrator within ten (10) days of
application. If the application is denied by the
Zoning Administrator, the applicant may go before
the Planning Commission at their next regularly
scheduled meeting.
v. In the event that one tenant of the building does not
utilize the full allotment of allowable area, the
excess may not be granted, traded, sold, or in any
other way transferred to another tenant for the
purpose of allowing a sign larger than twenty-five
percent (25%) of the total allowable area for signs.
. VI. Any building identification sign or building
directory sign shall be included in the total
allowable area for signs.
vii. Any sign that is shared by or is a combination of
two or more tenants shall be considered as separate
signs for square footage allowance and shall meet
the requirements thereof.
Vlll. All signs shall be consistent in design, material,
shape, and method of illumination.
(b)
In the case of a building where there are two (2) or more
uses and which, by generally understood and accepted
definitions, is considered to be a shopping center or
shopping mall, a conditional use permit shall be granted to
the entire building in accordance to an overall site plan
indicating their size, location, and height of all signs
presented to the Planning Commission.
.
-
A maximum of five percent (5%) of the gross area of the
front silhouette shall apply to the principal building where
the aggregate allowable sign area is equitably distributed
'ID
.
among the several businesses. In the case of applying this
conditional use permit to a building, the building may have
one (l) pylon or freestanding sign identifying the building
which is in conformance with this ordinance. For purposes
of determining the gross area of the silhouette of the
principal building, the silhouette shall be defined as that
area within the outline drawing of the principal building as
viewed from the front lot line or from the related public
street( s).
(c)
Signs for promoting and/or selling a development project:
For the purpose of promoting or selling a development
project of three (3) to twenty-five (25) acres, one sign not to
exceed one hundred (100) square feet of advertising surface
may be erected on the project site. For projects of twenty-
six (26) to fifty (50) acres, one or two signs not to exceed
two hundred (200) aggregate square feet of advertising
surface may be erected. For projects over fifty-one (51)
acres, one, two, or three signs not to exceed three hundred
(300) aggregate square feet of advertising surface may be
erected. No dimension shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet
exclusive of supporting structures.
.
Such signs shall not remain after ninety-five (95) percent of
the project is developed. Such sign permits shall be
reviewed and renewed annually by the City Council. If
said sign is lighted, it shall be illuminated only during those
hours when business is in operation or when the model
homes or other developments are open for business
purposes.
4. Pylon Sign: The erection of one (l) pylon sign for any single lot is
allowed under the following provisions:
(a) Location: No pylon sign shall be located closer to the
property line than as allowed in Section 3-9 [C] 7. In the
case of a comer lot, both sides fronting on a public right-of-
way shall be deemed the front.
(#269,5/8/95)
.
'-
(b) Parking Areas, Driveways: No part of the pylon signs shall
be less than five (5) feet trom any driveway or parking area.
1E-
.
(c)
Area, Height Regulations:
SPEED AREA HEIGHT
ROAD CLASSIFICATION (MPH) (SO FT) FEET
Collector
30 25 16
35 50 20
40 100 24
30 50 18
35 100 22
40 125 24
45 150 26
50 175 28
Major Thoroughfares
Freeways and
Expressways
55 200
and
above
32
Highway 25
NA
50-
100
22
.
1. In the case of subject property directly abutting
State Highway 25, pylon sign area may range from
50 sq ft to 100 sq ft depending on total lineal feet
fronting Highway 25. 3.03 feet of pylon sign area is
allowed per every 10 feet of lineal frontage with the
following exceptions: 1) all properties may erect a
pylon sign with a sign area of 50 regardless of front
footage abutting Highway 25, and 2) the maximum
pylon sign area shall not exceed 100 sq ft regardless
of total lineal footage of property abutting Highway
25.
(#173,4/10/89)
(d) Definitions: Definitions of road classifications apply as
defined by the official comprehensive plan as adopted.
(e) Application: The level at which the sign control system
applies is determined by the type of road, as defined above,
which directly abuts the subject property.
.
-
I.
In the case of subject property directly abutting
more than one (1) road, each designated by a
'IF
.
different road classification type, the less restrictive
classification shall apply in determining sign area
and height.
II.
Actual sign height is determined by thc grade of the
road from which the sign gains its principal
exposure.
Ill.
Area as determined by the formula under 3 (c)
above, applies to one (1) face of a two (2) faced
pylon sign, or two (2) faces of a four (4) faced sign,
etc.
IV.
A bonus allowing "freeway standard signs" (200 sq
ft in area and 32' high) in a commercial or industrial
area is available to all businesses located within 800
feet of a freeway but do not abut a freeway.
5. Address Numbers Sign: A minimum of one (1) address number
sign shall be required on each building in all zoning districts.
.
(a)
Location: The address numbers shall be so placed to be
easily seen from the public street.
(b) Size Regulations: The address numbers shall not be less
than three and one-half (3-1/2) inches in height.
(c) Material Regulation: The address numbers shall be metal,
plastic, or wood.
(d) Color Regulation: The address numbers shall be in a
contrasting color to the color of the building/dwelling.
(e) Enforcement Regulation: The Building Official or Zoning
Administrator or their authorized representative shall:
1. Assign all new building/dwelling address numbers.
II. Approve type of material and color of all
building/dwelling address numbers.
6.
Proiecting Signs: Within the CCD District but only in the
"Broadway Downtown District" thereof as defined by the
Monticello Downtown and Riverfront Revitalization Plan,
proiecting signs shall be permitted.. Such signs:
.
1&
.
.
.
1.
shall not exceed six (6) square feet in area,
!l. shall be considered a wall sign for thc purposcs of
maximum allowable sign area,
!!l. shall be attached to a building facade fronting on a public
street
IV. shall not extend more than 12" beyond the plane of the
building facade to which it is attched, and
v. shall be at least 8 feet but not more than 12 feet in height
above walking surfaces or sidewalks.
This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication according
to law.
ADOPTED by the Monticello City Council this
day of
1999.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
By:
Roger Belsaas, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator
AYES:
NAYS:
71-/
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/07/99
8.
Public Hearing - Consideration of granting a conditional use permit allowing a
small expansion to Hawks Sports Bar and Grill. (10)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
Planning Commission is asked to consider granting a conditional use permit that would
allow a small expansion to Hawks Bar. As you may know, Hawks was annexed to the
City into a B-3 zone. The B3 District allows Bars/Restaurants as a conditional use when
located in close proximity to a residential area. When Hawks was annexed, the facility
carne into the city as a permitted use (by conditional use permit). However, the site itself
is non-conforming because it was developed under County regulations. Typically, when
such non-conforming sites are expanded, an effort is made to bring the site up to code.
City staff knows of no complaints from local residents regarding the operation of the
facility.
The site area, not including the parcel in the Township, is 40,000 square feet. The
useable building area is being expanded from 2,338 to 3,326 square feet. The expansion
area is on the south side of the building and will result in 988 sq. ft. of addition dining
area.
Parking
The parking requirement for the site is estimated by the contractor, using code
requirements, at 75 stalls. Parking stalls shown on the site plan amount to 68. The site
plan needs to be updated to show parking stall and drive aisle dimensions. There is no
curb proposed by the owner around the perimeter of the parking area. Striping of the lot
is also needed. It is suggested that the stall deficiency be accepted under the "proof of
parking" provision of the Zoning ordinance. Under this provision, the CUP could be
approved under the provision that additional stalls be constructed along the north side of
the building at some point in the future, if necessary, as determined by the Planning
Commission.
Storm water flows offthe site on the north side of the parking lot onto an adjoining
parcel. It may be necessary to make improvement to control this flow to avoid erosion.
Lighting System Adjustments
The lighting used for illuminating the volleyball courts produce some glare affecting
CSAH75 and the adjoining residential area. Planning Commission may wish to require
adjustments to the outdoor lighting.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/07/99
Landscaping
Currently there is minimal landscaping and no trees on site. The site plan should be
adjusted to show plantings necessary to comply with city code.
Westerly Parcel
The site consists of three parcels. The building expansion is occurring on the middle
parcel with the westerly wall located withing the setback of the adjacent parcel.
Typically, this problem could be resolved simply by extinguishing the lot line. In this
case, this is impossible within the developers time frame because the westerly parcel must
first be annexed to the city before the lot line can be extinguished. As an alternative to
removing the lot line, the owner will be placing a restriction against the lot that promises
that the lot will not be sold separately.
Sign Svstem
.
The sign system consisting of a wall sign and pylon sign may need to be updated to meet
city code. The precise dimensions of the sign are not available at this time so it is not
known if significant changes are needed. It does not appear that sign system is at
significant variance with code.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Motion to recommend approval of a conditional use permit allowing expansion
of a restaurant/bar in a B-3 zone contingent on meeting requirements outlined in
Exhibit Z. Motion based on the finding that the expansion under the conditions
listed will upgrade the area and will not result in a negative impact on the nearby
residential area.
2. Motion to deny approval of a conditional use permit allowing expansion of a
restaurant/bar in a B-3 zone.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDA nON
City staff recommends alternative 1.
D.
.
SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Copy of site plan.
Exhibit Z - Conditions
U!~~ /
/
I ~~= /
. I - t ~
;I ~ .a.
lililiQ I~-
). h~
fa~
>: ..
Q Q
, \
i ~
- T-t~
I
m
rii
,\
\1
\
~
~~J t;F
if -h.t
Ifi r!f~
fl : ~i;~
t[ fru
at ~HI
lfJ:
(
I
, ,
, ~
I I
l
I
!C1Cr~'.e'E I~.J'
J I~ I
HII
rii
s ~Hi 8
ill Oh ill
I- i i
'", I
~I.el! ~.'"
( ti
\~ 11
\Q()
)-(1\
-__,:",l f ~
~\ \',:z: '
\ " ' 0
, '\ J;>
JJ -:It
~:t
~-
~(\
1:
)-
11
"
..
/
I
/
/
I . .
.
\
\
\
\
.
'-
m:! !~I:Ui !!Iil
. i! l~ :i!~~.i . j!
~~!; l~i2Sll ~Ii!
Ua f~rS~1 ~2!
i~ }III~ !;i
1(~,1K:f;;:~":~ ..,;,.. -:'.::, Jt~i,~~ ;'.::,:~~~ \':~
iiiiiii:ii;;li~W Iii it I
115~1 ~ I i I; !I f!~ Li I
nil i Ltiba i:i
, ~'" '..".~ , i },'
II
i I i
1'.' "
j ~
t
.:, .' ,,~~t
.:....,.'..MT'_" - ..',,.,,,,,,,, I
\'*-trl'.' ~, '\L!;'~ It""..:". ".o<t.-...'.' "'.~
:[XIIIIII'R:....-..:.i~ ~,..;:r~:"-~..~J'~,~;::"/-.,'..~
!"=~~- ."'1I,i\"'1'W~1itI ll.;.:>.,.~'."'~~' ...;-,~,'-'1,=:.~ T
~ . '~;.o~:p~~~_ "I' '. :..,.:...~_~
'bA
.
.
.
CONDITIONS
Hawks Restaurant/Bar
1 . Installation of curb and gutter
2. Management of stormwater as approved by the City Engineer.
3. Adjustments to lighting to eliminate glare as required by City Code.
4. Installation of landscaping as required by code.
5. Site plan to be revised to show parking stall and drive aisle dimensions. Parking lot
needs striping.
6. Development of westerly parcel independent of developed parcel is restricted and can not
be sold apart from the
7. Sign system to meet city standards.
8.
Proof of parking identified on north side of building. Property owner agrees to construct
parking area if necessary as determined by the Planning Commission.
EXHIBIT Z
'6D
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 09-07-99
9.
Consideration of Concept and Development Sta!!e Residential Planned Unit
Development Consisting of Five 12 Unit Apartments. (NAC)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
Monticello Village Apartments has submitted a revised Concept Plan for Planning
Commission consideration pursuant to the direction of the City Council. The applicants
are now requesting approval of both the Concept Plan and Development Stage PUD Plan.
Changes to the original plan include the following:
... Revised the pond dimensions to provide a portion of the ponding area to the north
of the apartment buildings adjacent to the property line.
... Revised the building locations to provide for better building spacing.
... Revised the garage structures to provide some garage stalls on the east side of the
project.
The applicants have also provided additional information with regard to grading, building
details, and landscaping. Due to the late date of submission, staff expects to have further
review comments available at the Planning Commission meeting.
One item has been identified which should be incorporated into the plans for the project.
Due to the number of units on the site, staff would recommend that a play structure be
located within the project to provide on-site recreation for young children living in the
complex. The Community Center and Pinewood Elementary School are within a few
blocks of the project which will provide reasonable play opportunities for school age
children in the neighborhood. A suggested location would be to offset the central 1 ()
space parking lot, and include a play area in this courtyard.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Decision 1: Concept PUD approval for Monticello Village Apartments
1. Motion to recommend approval of the revised Concept Stage PUD, subject to the
conditions listed in the original staff report, as well as the additional
recommendations made in Exhibit Z.
2. Motion to recommend denial of the Concept Stage PUD, based on a finding that
the changes do not satisfy the concerns ofthe Planning Commission and City
Council with regard to site planning or the intent of the PUD Ordinance.
3.
Motion to table action on the Concept Stage PUD, subject to additional
information.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 09-07-99
Decision 2: Development Stage pun Approval for Monticello Village Apartments
1. Motion to recommend approval of the Development Stage PUD, subject to the
recommendations in Exhibit Z.
2. Motion to recommend denial of the Development Stage PUD, based on a finding
that the project does not meet the intent of the City's PUQ Ordinance.
3. Motion to table action on the Development Stage PUD, subject to additional
information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDA nON
.
Staff believes that the Concept Plan changes reflect the direction of staff, the Planning
Commission and City Council, and recommend approval of the Concept Stage PUD. The
Development Stage Pud has had little detailed review, due to its late submission. The
purpose of the Development Stage PUD is to establish a plan which has worked out
almost all of the details of the development, and closely reflects the final project which
will be constructed. As noted above, staff will have additional review comments
available for the Planning Commission meeting. Any approval of the Development Stage
PUD should incorporate a condition that further staff review is necessary prior to the
preparation or approval of the Final PUD plans.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Preliminary Development Plans (12 pages)
Exhibit Z - Conditions
.
I 0 ~ i: I
2..Illo 0 ~
CZ::S I;
a.~ == e
, Ai' ::r n i
. ::E: CD CD
CD DJ =
:-.~ 0
~CQ
::r UI <
. ur ......
,lito _0
. .,.-
.. ..-
:31:)> m
Z<CC
UI~ CD
~C )>
NCD-a
...... m
::a.
3
CD
::s
....
tn
..
r-
r-
n
CD
...
...
o
ttl
Z'
III .
.
n
:;-
n
...
III
e;;,
:-'
.
en
=
~
...
....
o
o
.
iii:: "'0
g' ~~~ "
III ~ =; fj'
S' ;:!..... i1.
=' ""__ ~{. j!; -3
"" ICDCD "t:l~l
!l S'N N t:l ~ IT f!.1
a:: = -- .~, ,.. '0 O'
?I: ~'B 8 nJ ~}.it!
,..(.) (.) r!' "" ft' J
c.n 0 I I ~!l:l.
c.n r,....O
s: o....cc FIiI::~:e;
(.) a ~ ;J ~i? :z: :~ ;:t.
L.--..--...._~_.. .--.--...-...J
I
, I
~ KI I .
I) n I
~i ~I
-(I)
-?c; --
:,..
?i
. I
I
r.
I
I
" ~ I r-
I 0
~o I ~ ~
-----1 = 5
+(' : ~ ~
~~ I ~
I
I
_._.._.._..~
I
~
3: s: 0' CACA 0' ~'_._--
-y
0 0 ... D);:+ ..,
-
::1 ~(I) ..,
... ::s
-- _.~
n ~ D)C) (I)
(D -.
n
-
- ~Dl
0 (I)
~ -
.
s: - CAS: 3
0
z < (I)~
-
~cc
-.
- (1)'11 ::1
-
D) 'II'" C
CC Q)
~!.
(I)
~
)> D):3
....D)
"
~cc
D) ,
;+ 3 ~(I) C
3 S>>
-.m (I)
CD ~.,
~ '" 0 <
~ Qo !!.
tn (I)
.-0
D)~ 0
::so
0.0
-C
t/I::s
n~
3
D)'"
,,0
-
_.~ ....-....
. " . .I.\,~,~..' ".' ". \ :. I ,
.; i',.. ""."" .'.'~"':1".'~ \, >. '.
~~:... 00" ......... ..., ... ""I VIC - .Il'tO I-_""H_'___'___'__'__'HH_'_'~_ ..,~ utili .....U NM....""" I .
..' __H'__'__H'_H_'__'H___... lI:XJC):lO ClJlO3N:) .~".."n -tn _''''-'',_", .... .. _
~~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::: - Na'AlO eftUMY ~lg ~ tl:l._
- B =.~~ar'J --------- - -.. :m 'S1N3IuWcN 3llmI\ 0TU:lUN0Il1 ~
"--/ .. =:::: - ... "'" ...... ~ I SNOlS~ lnlI J.Wn 3fJY1"M u-.
I
· L - - ~~T~,!!!!-fc- 11' -,-_,,;/u-C . ==-~~~:~'==:__
,,-L - J -.- . ..... ',',"'" p...--. . ..,.--..,---.~. "",,,'''.__W'-''''.___, I.
. ,.. .... r' . .4 . ,..-_'-:':"'-'';':':~~''''-':'_:'-~'-'~':~;~~:=.:'jf...~,'~..:..:..._,:--I'''7i''''~'',},;r--" _'-'-'- _._--=-,
1".- '-"."--~. -~....-. '..' . ....... . ---' ..-.---.,...-.- r, . _f'-" . .
.____~........,.--,e.~::::"-j:-."'_.~ '_"_~_~":-~.'-'-- ';~==:~-;::~::;;'";, .c,.c.:.:c'" ,;;..ce,_.., '~'"C-"''''.'..''-''''''''':'';''''''-'~~,~., " ,';c _. _. -Ill -=-:;::-11I ~.!".
..-_-1 .....__,..,1. ';.""::'_--. --. -~'--"--'.... "."", '. _ .." -., _ '" _op ---.. 1=. _ ~ "'''''...,'''....,,...._1 1
--'.::::... ->--.. .~::::..:~-:--.. -:=:.......:......::;:::::.,,::::~..~, - ., ; '. "". . ~J'-~ ,"- , _ ,
C.l:':'~;..:,iU.;\,;,.;;-..;JiIIi~:t.~.:".,;~.:.<:ft...i.:.:.,.tj~. , -- - ----1 I
"'""., '... ---.
----
---- t ,
: '\ [1--='-~ l ,
I '\ : r
I \ i i I
\ ,.. ,. 1
I I : ,';~ '~
I \ ',\ ~, I
10." ,I~ .: :. , I
I \;
i i /..."",,..1
I'......., h-r\'..~ I
" '" ,&J"'r~V."'" ~~- ." .,&. ... .......,f .,'... .
, . JI:~::.;:J ...1
I I i
I ',! ~ II I · IIII i :
! I iil.~i I: i !,~ - : h
I IIII I Ii I .1!tIU~~B
i IlliJ~! I;,: I ~!iiliB!1
~ II, Jlidl; ':; !1~1;i!nl'lllI
~ 1'111'1111 lill! I'
~~I 5~ il I ~IJI~ II~I~I
.. .. . .. . . .
.,
I:
I~
i cl~
\ ..
IW;liDii Dr!
e ..1111'......
I I ~.R 1'1
i~ ft
a-
I
l'UII I JI
I~illll ~III;;
II
:::-:L-----... .
. __________ I
.-----------r-----
;: III
.- I
:-~
11 JiI~ I i u~~ ~I
It ~.. ~ I ! i;; ~~
I ~ ~:: I !ij I~
I Nip! ~1l1;
~ 1:4 I
~IIIII;; m~~
~1118.n !i
i; ~~lls ~I
~ '~~II~
.. i II; ~ I ill
I~I I ! :;
II ~ ! II
la ! e II
=- U ! ! ~~
1]1 I~II~~~; ~I I! I' ;
!;, ~.. = i ~ all ;1 II I
I ~; i a I t!i !; = ~
I 3 j I tlll; ·
~~~!~ ~ !j. ~I ~ 15m I i ~ ~II
I ;ij J!II I~I i~ :~I i ;~ ::=:1 Ii ~ ~
Ig1 1:' · il! j~}! I~! I~II! ;~ J!i BI
!~ ~I~ I ~3i I~ i~~ ! I~ ~!!lll I ~~
~I ~al I iB !~ Is 5 I ~el~ 's
i~ Ii: : ~il ~~ la ~ 5 !!;;i i II
Ii lil~ I llllillil II ~ j s~~~1 ~ ~ll
:1 ~~ g ;1; : Ii ~ ~!~II I ~I
Ii II ! Ill~ I;. I ;!5! ~ ~~
~I ~ lill~ ~ 8 R;I~ i 1=
! = = ~ 8 Si a
I ~I; ;~~i Ii ~i; II~~; ;il!; ~Ii Ii ~i ~
! III Sl~~ I !II ~~;~I ~~i~lllj ~p ~m i
I !I~ i5~ r8 j~ If' ~~ I~~ Ii.
~ Il! I lill~ MI~ II 0
I~ I~~ ~ : a Mi ~~ 15 i~
~a ~~~ m S! a ~ ill I G
I~ Ii 1I i!a~ ~ Ij ~I J
S= = I! ~a ~ i
~
p ~ p ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ -
,- . ~
i I; I ~
. JI ~ J~ I
~fBI
l!r Ii tJ
J
~~I!II!
:;J ~ ~
~. J!' ~ J,. I
~i ~I I JI
~. I J !I
~ i -~
1
~
II
!I
I . '.' . .! "... ....v..., ,'., .' ",,,,,, H'.
. . ~..;
& n ::,. G
II ';~~ J
. .'~'
. ... . r Ow... . ':. +. .....
~
I I.
e II
II
~I
;
..,
l
It "1
~---_._._-'''''-
...-....-.--
I
Ii _:. . ,.' ~
I.. 11 ~~:;>~>,:~
. . .'" ....
:.' ~. :.. ~ ": :-. . . : .
. . . 4:.: '. .. .. ...... +
I R~
~
I ~
I! i
.1 i I
.
,. '"
11:-
. II
I "'~
I fill
~ II
II. Ig
Is
iC
II
I
.111 {-
~ j :.
iJiJ a, ~~
~ i ~. '::
=C ~ ~
I a ~~ :~
I ~ J .~
- I IU :';
l:; :~
..
~~ ~.. .,.. .... ,~... .....
4'-"
~ ~ t:
~
Z t:l
c;'l ~
I
4'-" ~ Z '1
51 ~ 0 c;'l
t:l !C
2 .....
c;'l z
_2
::tl "\"
0 I
0 '1
s: r
,
~ t
'I tr:l ~
~ t"l t"l
t:l t::l
~ ~ ::tl
'I 0
~ 0 .!. 0
!C . !C
~
~ ttl
t"l t"l
t:l t:l
::tl ::tl WI-'/' r... WI-'/' ...
0 ~ 0
0 a 0 ",...
B: < II: ~
.....:,.......~__'U..~....'Io.__~'Io..........'Io.__....~.,I..........
.. ..-I~~ ! r
r--4" r..,
w..,r ....
.~ ~
"...
r....-- 11-
~ t
"I:l tr:l
> t"l
~ t:l ~
::tl
8
.u_ s:
I ~
-1
.1
I ~ .. \
I ~ ..
..
t:l Z
2 '" c;'l t l '-lI'
!.U 2 ~ ~ ..... ..
~~1_. 4'-0. c;'l 0
I:
"-I' ~'-~' 10'-0'
~~_._- -
,....::;..:"..uu_ ~
'!!/SHOWER ~
ttl ~
~> Z
- ~
I ~ ~
I
. "I
I l
,
~-- --- .---
Conditions of Approval for Monticello Village Apartments Development Stage pun
1. Conditions included in the original Concept Plan review are incorporated into this
recommendation.
2. The Developer alters the site plan to incorporate a play area for young children on the
site.
3. Additional Staff review is conducted prior to preparation and approval of the Final PUD
plans. If the recommendations from staff result in significant changes, the Development
Stage PUD will be reviewed again by the Planning Commission and City Council.
Exhibit Z
q~
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/07/99
10. Public Hearine: Consideration of an application for renewal of an interim use permit
allowing a public school use in an 1-1 Zone. (FP)
A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND:
The Monticello School District is applying for renewal of an interim use permit for public
school use at 1248 Oakwood Drive East, in an 1-1 Light Industrial District. Originally allowed
by the City in September 1997, the interim use permit stipulated that upon the one year
anniversary of the original interim use permit, the applicant must reapply to the City.
Over the course of the past year staff received no complaints from adjacent property owners.
The Alternative Learning Center program has been a success and staff is recommending that
the interim use be allowed to continue for an additional year term. It is suggested that the
interim use permit again expire on some date certain, and that the School District be required to
reapply to the City on or before that expiration date should they want to continue the interim
use.
B. AL TERNA TIVES:
1. Motion to recommend to the City Council to approve the issuance of an interim use
permit to the Monticello School District to operate an alternative school program at
1248 Oakwood Drive East, subject to the findings that the proposed use will not
interfere with the City's long range objectives to encourage industrial development in
the area; and that the following conditions apply to the interim use permit:
I. The interim use permit will expire on August 31, 2000. Extension of the use of the subject
property for public school use beyond the termination date may only be allowed by re-
application to the City.
2. The District agrees to expand the parking area at the direction of the City. The City will direct
expanded parking based on its observation of parking demand which may cause the use of on-
street parking at any time.
3. The use of the subject property will be during normal school hours only.
4. The granting of this interim use permit shall not be effective until after inspection and approval
of the building and property by the City Building Official.
5. Motion to recommend to the City Council that the interim use permit be denied and that
continued school use in the Light Industrial District end on or before (date to be
determined); finding that the continued school use in the Light Industrial District would
interfere with the City's long range industrial development goals (and as otherwise
determined by Planning Commission).
C. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Alternate 1 above.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
. Copy of previous action.
cl 6' - V~~Lt
5.
Consent agenda.
fILE COPy
Council Minutes - 10/12/98
F. Consideration of an application for renewal of an interim use permit allowing a
public school use in an 1-1 zone. Applicant. Monticello Public Schools.
Recommendation: Approve the issuance of an interim use permit to the
Monticello School District to operate an alternative school program at 1248
Oakwood Drive East subject to the following conditions:
1. The interim use permit will expire on August 31, 1999. Extension
of the use of the subject property for public school use beyond the
termination date may only be allowed by reapplication to the City.
2. The District agrees to expand the parking area at the direction of
the City. The City will direct expanded parking based on its
observation of parking demand which may cause the use of non-
street parking at any time.
3. The use of the subject property will be during normal school hours
only.
4. The granting of this interim use permit shall not be effective until
after inspection and approval of the building and property by the
City Building Official.
Recommendation is based on the finding that the proposed use will not interfere
with the City's long-range objectives to encourage industrial development in the
area.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO
APPROVE ITEMS SA, 5B, 5D, 5E, SF, 5G, AND 5H OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS
RECOMMENDED. Motion carried unanimously.
/O-A
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/07/99
11. Zoning Code Violations at Lots 6 and 7. Block 3. Oakwood Industrial Park (10)
To: Planning Commission
From: Jeff O'Neill
Date: September 3, 1999
Re: Zoning Code Violations - Lots 6 and 7, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park
City staff has compiled a partial listing and documented zoning code issues at the subject
property. The list includes the following problem areas.
1. Expansion of outside storage onto adjoining parcel has occurred recently without a
conditional use permit. Also, the expansion area does not contain a principal structure.
Outside storage on an individual lot is not allowed without an interim use permit. The
solution here is to combine the lots and process a conditional use permit allowing outside
storage.
Requirements associated with outside storage CUP are not being met which include
establishment of a buffer yard adjacent to residential area to the south. Storage or parking
areas need to be paved or non-dust producing rock used. Other landscaping
improvements as required
2. Glare. Flood lights on the south wall spill light into the adjoining residential area to the
south. These lights should be relocated to poles and pointed down.
3. Above ground tanks constructed without a permit and in violation of set-back ordinances.
4. No permit ever obtained for storage of blocks. It should be noted that pine trees were
planted by the owner in an effort to screen blocks. This was done on his own without city
involvement.
Next step
City staff will arrange a meeting with the property owner to discuss opportunities to upgrade the
site to meet code. It is hoped that this contact wil1 be sufficient to gain cooperation.
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/07/99
12. Discussion on registering for the tele-conference session for the Y2 Plan Conference.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Report by J efT O'Neill
SUPPORTING DATA
Registration Form
~~;. 4 CMt.qiMf ~
21th Annual Minnesota State Planning Conference
Conference Program
11.. ,
AUt; 2 5 19m i, September 29 - October 1, 1999
I: - !
1 i'; I -) (~.--~, ." ". ,,--'.J I ThunderbirdH~t~I-& Convention Cente~----------------- ..
...----,,-...'--:::.;-'::/~,-~~~:~-~gJ Bloomington. Minnesota
l.,,,~.
__",~...___~,~,._,_____~~___._,,~~~..~..,.~."__.~~UW"__.____._..._.,___~..__,___=._~,~______,=____w__~_.___........____~._
Sponsored by the MnAPA -
Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association , 2. ~
MnAPA - Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association
~,4ItMb..~w
On behalf of the Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning
Association, we invite you to Bloomington and the 27'h Annual
Minnesota State Planning Conference. Bloomington is a fitting
location for this year's conference because a number of major
planning initiatives are underway nearby. Massive airport
improvements, LRT, continued development around the Mall of
America, and neighborhood redevelopment are all happening in
and around Bloomington. Many of these issues are topics of
conference sessions, and are bound to appeal to professional and
citizen planners alike. There are also many sessions dealing with
rural issues and concerns in Greater Minnesota.
The theme of the conference - Y2Plan, Staying Ahead in a
Changing World - does not imply that the conference will assist
you in last minute Y2K bug exterminations. But it will provide
ideas, concepts and tools that you can use into 2000 and beyond.
Fun always complements a learning environment. This year's
conference provides time for serious discussions as well as
opportunities to have a good time. Mobile workshops, a golf
outing and a bicycle tour will provide wonderful learning and
recreational opportunities.
Register early, and enjoy the conference.
tJ\ '<l V\t-
Mark Koegler
1999 MoAPA Conference Chair
II
27th Annual Minnesota State Planning Conference
Wednesday
. ~~~t~~b.e.r .2.9.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9:00 8.m. - 4:30 p.m.
l.K"u.o..~ttJ ~~Miatq 4Mb CoHtptiMu ~o..k,lwp: Lookiatq 4t ~u,t4Ut4AilitlJ
Presented by the Government Training Service (GTS)
This workshop covers environmental planning and compliance, with an emphasis on sustainable
development. Topics include: principles of environmental stewardship, major environmental
compliance program areas, and information on national, state, and local environmental laws,
regulations, and ordinances.
Ken Nimmer, Environmental Planner, C & E Planning
Gunnar Isberg, Gunnar Isberg & Associates
Hannah Dunevitz, Regional Plant Ecologist, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Register through the Government Training Service using the enclosed separate form or by
calling 651-222-7409.
10:00 8.m. - 4:00 p.m. 1Uiatke,ot4 ~~kiatq', CoHtlttUkitlJ..'IJ4,eb ~~kiatq ~oftUHt
Participants in the Community-Based Planning program will meet throughout the day to share
insights and learn more about succeeding with a community-based planning program. A number
of sessions will be open to anyone interested in developing a community-based plan.
Contact Nicole Brown at 651-296-6550 for more information.
12:00 noon - 6:00 p.m. Conference Registration
1:00 - 4:00 p.m. )>4fte to )>e'Uik!
Some of us came to planning through landscape architecture or design. . . and many of us did
not! As policy planners we may react to site designs from a regulatory point-of-view. This session
will engage planners in hands-on design problems. How do you begin when designing a
subdivision? What design aspects are important in neighborhood redevelopment and how do you
decipher them? This session is intended for planners and Planning Commissioners who need to
understand the design basics. Me. Marckels, from the U ofM Design Center, will lead us through
some design basics and then allow us to "play in the sandbox."
Dan Marl;:kels, University of Minnesota Design Center for the American Urban Landscape
"l{.oek..O"," 1ftfoti4tiok ~kiU,
Kit Welchlin is a highly energetic speaker who will utilize a variety of approaches and hands-on
exercises to help us increase our negotiating abilities. While planners typically operate in an
atmosphere of collaboration and consensus building (hopefully), much of it is actually
negotiating. In this session you will learn how to get people and groups to build more effective
solutions through cooperation. Mr. Welchlin will teach us the five reasons why people don't
cooperate, techniques to gain cooperation, five steps in the negotiation process, and
characteristics of effective negotiators. In addition, we will also practice various techniques to
help strengthen confidence and reach identified outcomes.
Kit Wekhlin, Welchlin Communication Strategies
4:00 - 6:00 p.m. Opening Reception in Exhibit Area
Planners, planning students, and planning commissioners are all welcome to join the fun. Live
music provided by the eclectic, eccentric, and always entertaining Mark Stillman.
4:00 - 5:00 pm MnAPA Annual Meeting
All MnAP A members are encouraged to attend.
Ia. V
Thursday
. ~~~t!l~b.e.r ,3.0.
MnAPA - Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association
. _.._."!~-_._,_._._,-~~-"...,,,,--_.,..,,_.__......,.,._.
-.-." ~.~~.-.=~...........-=~-,..=~--_.~,"._-,'~'-' "_.."',..._---~,...__.,--~~~_...............~~~~-'-~-_.."~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7:30 a.m. -12:00 noon Conference Registration
Exhibit Area Open
7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Breakfast
Welcome from Bloomington Mayor, Coral Houle
8:45 -10:00 a.m.
k!'!'?':~1l:g ~~ss~.t1: ~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' .........
/Jeee~~ 1ft''''fe...e..t 1b1: Li..lci"f lla,,,,polat,tio.. ,..~ L,..~ 'k~e
Successful access management enables traffic to flow safety and efficiently without
compromising access to adjacent land development. It is a key feature ofMnDOTs strategy to
preserve and maintain the safety, capacity, and mobility of the state's highway system and link
the communities and businesses it serves. Find out more about MnDOT's pattnership with
counties and cities to develop access policies and link transportation investment with land use
decisions. Ms. Reichert will introduce the discussion, defining access management, discussing
trends, and updating the audience on MnDOT's experiences over the last several years in
implementing access policies. Mr. Sobota will provide "real-life" tales from the trenches as a
planner with an eye to access management.
Peggy Reichert, Planning Director, MnDOT
Mike Sobota, Planning Director, City of Lakeville
C4.. z,Je /Jllola~ /Jllola~,~te 1I0u.~i"f1
Everyone talks about affordable housing, but is anyone actually building it? This session will
delve into the whys and why nots of creating affordable housing in a hot real estate market.
Mr. Ulfers will provide an overview of Dakota County's affordable housing success stories.
Mr. Laurent will share his perspective as a housing developer and give insight into the real costs
of developing affordable housing in a market dominated by a demand for market-rate housing.
Ms. Hadley will respond to issues raised by the previous speakers, particularly regarding costs and
incentives, and update the audience on affordable housing bills that were enacted during this past
legislative session.
Mark Ulrers, Director, Dakota County HRA
Gary Laurent, President, Laurent Builders
Kit Hadley, Commissioner, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
~eUiMf 0" '60'1a~ t"e ~1~ lla,i..: LOt" ~o"ela.....e..t -pt,....i..q /Jpptit,tio..~
Are you still a little skeptical about Geographic Information Systems (GIS)? Do you still think
that GIS is an expensive toy that your local government can't afford? Terese Rowekamp will
explain some of the advances that have occurred in GIS technology during the last few years and
show you how planning offices can take advantage of them.
This session will explain the GIS software capabilities most useful for planners, provide
visual examples of ways in which certain problems or time-consuming ventures are better
accomplished through GIS, explain how to assesS your city's current technology situation, and
provide vendor contact information should you need assistance.
Terese Rowekamp, Rowekamp Associates
II, b
27th Annual Minnesota State Planning Conference
. ._-------,.~'...............~~,-,._---_.,._'_.,-'-"""'........- .....--,",+.",. ._"._~~."~.,._~_._---~'" """,~,..-
Wednesday
. ~~pt~~b.e.r .2.9.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + . . .
9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
D.uu.o..HtattJ ~lM..btf AIla Co.ptuu.u I-Jo..k,ltop: Lookbtf At ~U,t4itt4&UitIJ
Presented by the Government Training Servke (GTS)
This workshop covers environmental planning and compliance, with an emphasis on sustainable
development. Topics include: principles of environmental stewardship, major environmental
compliance program areas, and information on national, state, and local environmental laws,
regulations, and ordinances.
Ken Nimmer, Environmental Planner, C & E Planning
Gunnar Isberg, Gunnar Isberg & Associates
Hannah Dunevitz, Regional Plant Ecologist, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Register through the Government Training Service using the enclosed separate form or by
calling 651-222-7409.
10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. 1ffmMe,ot4 ~tt....mf'~ Co.~itlJ"1J4ua ~tt.....btf fo.....
Participants in the Community-Based Planning program will meet throughout the day to share
insights and learn more about succeeding with a community-based planning program. A number
of sessions will be open to anyone interested in developing a community-based plan.
Contact Nicole Brown at 651-296-6550 for more information.
12:00 noon - 6:00 p.m. Conference Registration
1:00 - 4:00 p.m. }>4toe to }>e~i4M!
Some of us came to planning through landscape architecture or design. . . and many of us did
not! As policy planners we may react to site designs from a regulatory point-of-view. This session
will engage planners in hands-on design problems. How do you begin when designing a
subdivision? What design aspects are important in neighborhood redevelopment and how do you
decipher them? This session is intended for planners and Planning Commissioners who need to
understand the design basics. Mr. Marckels, from the U ofM Design Center, will lead us through
some design basics and then allow us to "play in the sandbox."
Dan Marckels, University of Minnesota Design Center for the American Urban Landscape
"/lMock..(Jut" lteqotiAtio.. ~kiU~
Kit Welchlin is a highly energetic speaker who will utilize a variety of approaches and hands-on
exercises to help us increase our negotiating abilities. While planners typically operate in an
atmosphere of collaboration and consensus building (hopefully), much of it is actually
negotiating. In this session you will learn how to get people and groups to build more effective
solutions through cooperation. Me. Welchlin will teach us the five reasons why people don't
cooperate, techniques to gain cooperation, five steps in the negotiation process, and
characteristics of effective negotiators. In addition, we will also practice various techniques to
help strengthen confidence and reach identified outcomes.
Kit Welchlin, Welchlin Communication Strategies
4:00 - 6:00 p.m. Opening Reception in Exhibit. Area
Planners, planning students, and planning commissioners are all welcome to join the fun. Live
music provided by the eclectic, eccentric, and always entertaining Mark Stillman.
4:00 - 5:00 pm MnAPA Annual Meeting
All MnAPA members are encouraged to attend.
.t. E
MnAPA - Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association
...___.,_._.....,='M,_'.~.,_~". ".'n"....__,____"_.,,,._~ ,.,. -.-- .._._._".,",..,'~.,.,'-~,~.~--'~---,...'"""'~,..".,----,.-"."'~''''_.__._,.--,.".-""~~.~"-~--"~'='---~."~,~------
Thursday
. ~~~t~~b.e.r .3.0.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7:30 a.m. -12:00 noon
Conference Registration
Exhibit Area Open
\
7:30 - 8:30 a.m.
Breakfast
Welcome from Bloomington Mayor. Coral Houle
8:45 -10:00 a.m.
,!!0111~rl:g Ses~~o.n I
/lCte~~ 1ft"""4elKe..t 1()1: Li..ki"4 lta"..~pofat"tio.. "..b L"..b 1i~e
Successful access management enables traffic to flow safety and efficiently without
compromising access to adjacent land development. It is a key feature of MnDOT's strategy to
preserve and maintain the safety, capacity, and mobility of the state's highway system and link
the communities and businesses it serves. Find out more about MnDOT's partnership with
counties and cities to develop access policies and link transportation investment with land use
decisions. Ms. Reichert will introduce the discussion, defining access management, discussing
trends, and updating the audience on MnDOT's experiences over the last several years in
implementing access policies. Mr. Sobota will provide "real-life" tales from the trenches as a
planner with an eye to access management.
Peggy Reichert, Planning Director, MnDOT
Mike Sobota, Planning Director, City of Lakeville
C".. 'J4Je /lIIOtab /lIIOfab,,&k lIok~i"41
Everyone talks about affordable housing, but is anyone actually building it? This session will
delve into the whys and why nots of creating affordable housing in a hot real estate market.
Mr. Ulfers will provide an overview of Dakota County's affordable housing success stories.
Mr. Laurent will share his perspective as a housing developer and give insight into the real costs
of developing affordable housing in a market dominated by a demand for market-rate housing.
Ms. Hadley will respond to issues raised by the previous speakers, particularly regarding costs and
incentives, and update the audience on affordable housing bills that were enacted during this past
legislative session.
Mark Ulfers, Director, Dakota County HRA
Gary Laurent, President, Laurent Builders
Kit Hadley, Commissioner, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
~ettiKf 0.. '/Jo"fab t"e ~~~ 'lfa"i..: LOt"l ~ocleta"lKe..t ~l"....i"4 /lpplie"tio..~
Are you still a little skeptical about Geographic Information Systems (GIS)? Do you still think
that GIS is an expensive toy that your local government can't afford? Terese Rowekamp will I
explain some of the advances that have occurred in GIS technology during the last few years and
show you how planning offices can take advantage of them.
This session will explain the GIS software capabilities most useful for planners, provide
visual examples of ways in which certain problems or time-consuming ventures are better
accomplished through GIS, explain how to assess your city's current technology situation, and
provide vendor contact information should you need assistance.
Terese Rowekamp, Rowekamp Associates
It f
~"","""._....,..............~.."
27th Annual Minnesota State Planning Conference
lyf2!
-
fJ...e4ki.." l>ow.. ~0litie41 fJ4......ie...': ~ueee"e'
i.. 1..te...40Cle........e.d41 COopefa4tio..
Political boundaries sometimes hinder good planning. How can you successfully organize
planning efforts that span multiple jurisdictions?
Mr. Ringwald will provide examples from the I-35W Corridor Coalition. Through the
"Metropolitan Towns" project, the Coalition attempted to strengthen an existing neighborhood,
the West Lake Johanna Neighborhood, which spans Arden Hills, New Brighton, and Roseville.
The collaborative plan includes fiscal, zoning, and educational devices to ensure continued
private reinvestment in this neighborhood. The Coalition's second project redefined "Livable
Communities" from a glorified housing program to one that links housing, transportation and
jobs into a unified subregional system.
Kevin Ringwald, AICP, Assistant City Administrator, City of Arden Hills and Chair, Commu-
nity Development Committee ~ North Metro 1-35W Corridor Coalition
U44t', tcp 4t t4e Leqid4tu...e 1
The House of Representatives has set up three subcommittees to study: 1) study land use
planning and annexation, 2) the Metropolitan Council and agencies, and 3) the Tax Increment
Financing program. Representative Larsen and other legislators will provide an update on each
of the subcommittee's ideas and what to expect in the next session, as well as answer your
questions.
Representative Peg Larsen, Chair of the Committee on Local Government and Metropolitan
Affairs.
0:00 a.m. -10:15 a.m. Break
0:15 a.m. -11:30 a.m. Aff!nzing Sess~o.rl:!~ .
~iM4 ,4faOU"~ t4e L ~ 1. ~t4tio..
With the state legislature granting partial funding during the 1999 session, it appears that light
rail will become a reality in the Hiawatha corridor between downtown Minneapolis and the Mall
of America. Minneapolis has begun the planning process to ensure that its neighborhoods will
benefit from stations located along the rail route.
Ms. MacKenzie will discuss City planning efforts and provide a preview of station area
development. A neighborhood representative will address the LRT station issue from the
perspective of those already in the neighborhood.
Monique MacKenzie, City Planner II, City of Minneapolis
~...e'efaCl4tio.. 01 ~...i...e ,4"...ieultu"'41 L4"~': ~44t Uo...k,
Growth on the edge and a new era of rural homesteading have placed preservation of ag land high
on the list of city, township and county government priorities. Participate in this discussion of
the kinds of tools available to help save valuable farmland
Ms. Benson will provide an overview of Stearns County's effort to preserve farmland through
the use of the LESA (Land Evaluation and Site Assessment) system. Mr. Patton will present
results of the MnDA's recent analysis undertaken to provide information and direction to policy
makers on farmland preservation. The presenters will speak to the realities ofTDR (Transfer of
Development Rights) and PDR (Purchase of Development Rights) as tools for farmland
preservation.
Chelle Benson, Planner, Stearns County Environmental Services
Robert Patton, Local Government Outreach Coordinator. Minnesota Department of Agriculture
IZ G
MnAPA _ Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association
_....,.u....'.__ ,.,__,.",.__..m._"'_'''.__''''~'_ ,.
~...ple...e.diMq 'k..l4M ~Uft4iM4bititlJ 'P'4Mf
Local governments have been challenged to adopt sustainability plans by none other than the
United Nations, at the 1992 Conference on Environment and Development (the Rio
Conference). Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco have been on the cutting edge of sustainability
planning in the United States, and this session will summarize the work of Professors Laverny~
Rafter and Bernhagen analY1jng these efforts. The presentation will address the contents of the
plans, their similarities and differences; the extent of neighborhood and public involvement in
planning and implementation; and the impacts and "success" of the plans based on certain
indicators. The aim of the presentation is to find the lessons learned in these three bellwether
communities and analyze what ideas can be transferred to other communities.
David Laverny-Rafter, AICP, professor, Urban and Regional Studies, Mankato State University
Bill Bernhagen, Associate Professor, Urban and Regional Studies, Mankato State University
11:30 a.m. -12:30 p.m. Lunch
1:00 _ 4:00 p.m. Bike Tour of East Metropolitan Parks and Trails
Contact Cindy Carlsson at 651-229-0587 or carls 128@tc.umn.edu for more information and to
register.
1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Golf Tournament
Dwan Municipal Golf Course, Bloomington
Join your fellow planners in a perennial favorite outing, the conference golf scramble. Fun,
teamwork, prizes! You need to sign up on the conference form, but payment isn't due until you
register at the conference.
Cost: $25/person, Register on conference registration form, pay at the conference
For more information, contact AI Cottingham: 218-8282-2309 or acottingham@ci.brainerd.mn.us
Hotel Information
---
This year's conference will be held at the Thunderbird Hotel and Convention Center in
Bloomington.
Single/Double occupancy rooms are available at the hotel for $86 a night ($6 extra for each
additional adult). A number of suites are available for $145 a night. Rooms rates apply only
through September 14, 1999. It is very likely that the hotel will be fully booked at the time of
the conference, so plan accordingly and reserve your room early.
Reservations can be made by contacting the Thunderbird Hotel directly at 612-854~3411 or 1-
800-328~ 1931.
Please Note: since conference activities start early in the afternoon, not all rooms may be
available when you first arrive.
Directions: The Thunderbird is located between the airport and the Mall of America south of
highway I~494. Take the 24th Avenue Exit (south) and turn right on east 78th Street. (Look for
the totem pole.)
For those of you not staying at the hotel, MnAP A will provide a suite to use on an as~available
basis to store items, freshen up, or change into appropriate dining, golfing, or biking gear.
Contact the conference registration table to gain access.
It "
."'_."""".......~...............~-
27th Annual Minnesota State Planning Conference
\\,12\
-
,~.,__."""..'.__._..,~ ,,,~___.",,'"~_ .__....,'"W~_.,., ..._",.,~, .,. ,.__._.,.".., ..~~__._,...~'---,.~". - ____.."n._..._.,,''', ,.-- - ,~-..,-_,,~.=~'---_.'~""_."~'
6..e4ki"f )>ow.. ~otitit,t 64....ie..~: ~utee~~e~
iK ~..te..fO(/e...."'e..t41 Coope..,tio..
Political boundaries sometimes hinder good planning. How can you successfully organize
planning efforts that span multiple jurisdictions?
Mr. Ringwald will provide examples from the 1-35W Corridor Coalition. Through the
"Metropolitan Towns" project, the Coalition attempted to strengthen an existing neighborhood,
the West Lake Johanna Neighborhood, which spans Arden Hills, New Brighton, and Roseville.
The collaborative plan includes fiscal, zoning, and educational devices to ensure continued
private reinvestment in this neighborhood. The Coalition's second project redefined "Livable
Communities" from a glorified housing program to one that links housing, transportation and
jobs into a unified subregional system.
Kevin Ringwald, AICP, Assistant City Administrator, City of Arden Hills and Chair, Commu-
nity Development Committee - North Metro I-35W Corridor Coalition
~",t'~ 1ip ,t t"e Lefi~t'tu..e1
The House of Representatives has set up three subcommittees to study: 1) study land use
planning and annexation, 2) the Metropolitan Council and agencies, and 3) the Tax Increment
Financing program. Representative Larsen and other legislators will provide an update on each
of the subcommittee's ideas and what to expect in the next session, as well as answer your
questions.
Representative Peg Larsen, Chair of rhe Committee on Local Government and Metropolitan
Affairs.
10:00 a.m. -10:15 a.m. Break
10:15 a.m. -11:30 a.m. ~l!",:~ng S~s~io.1l:!! .
~i"f .,4"0U"~ t"e L~t ~t,tio..
With the state legislature granting partial funding during the 1999 session, it appears that light
rail will become a reality in the Hiawatha corridor between downtown Minneapolis and the Mall
of America. Minneapolis has begun the planning process to ensure that its neighborhoods will
benefit from stations located along the rail route.
Ms. MacKenzie will discuss City planning efforts and provide a preview of station area
development. A neighborhood representative will address the LRT station issue from the
perspective of those already in the neighborhood.
Monique MacKenzie, City Planner 11, City of Minneapolis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
~..e~e"(/4tio.. 01 ~..i"'e .,4f..ituttu..,' L,..~~: ~"4t ~o..k~
Growth on the edge and a new era of rural homesteading have placed preservation of ag land high
on the list of city, township and county government priorities. Participate in this discussion of
the kinds of tools available to help save valuable farmland
Ms. Benson will provide an overview of Stearns County's effort to preserve farmland through
the use of the LESA (Land Evaluation and Site Assessment) system. Mr. Patton will present
results of the MnDA's recent analysis undertaken to provide information and direction to policy
makers on farmland preservation. The presenters will speak to the realities ofTDR (Transfer of
Development Rights) and PDR (Purchase of Development Rights) as tools for farmland
preservation.
Chelle Benson, Planner, Stearns County Environmental Services
Robert Patton, Local Government Outreach Coordinator, Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Ie, x,
MnAPA ~ Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association
~HI"leHle"ti"f ~"&4" ~"ft4i"4&ilit" ~14"f
Local governments have been challenged to adopt sustainability plans by none other than the
United Nations, at the 1992 Conference on Environment and Development (the Rio
Conference). Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco have been on the cutting edge of sustainability
planning in the United States, and this session will summarize the work of Professors Laverny-
Rafter and Bernhagen analyzing these efforts. The presentation will address the contents of the
plans, their similarities and differences; the extent of neighborhood and public involvement in
planning and implementation; and the impacts and "success" of the plans based on certain
indicators. The aim of the presentation is to find the lessons learned in these three bellwether
communities and analyze what ideas can be transferred to other communities.
David Laverny-Rafter, AICP, Professor, Urban and Regional Studies, Mankato State University
Bill Bernhagen, Associate Professor, Urban and Regional Studies, Mankato State University
1:30 a.m. -12:30 p.m. Lunch
1:00 - 4:00 p.m. Bike Tour of East Metropolitan Parks and Trails
Contact Cindy Carlsson at 651-229-0587 or carls 128@tc.umn.edu for more information and to
regIster.
1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Golf Tournament
Dwan Municipal Golf Course, Bloomington
Join your fellow planners in a perennial favorite outing, the conference golf scramble. Fun,
teamwork, prizes! You need to sign up on the conference form, but payment isn't due until you
register at the conference.
Cost: $25/person, Register on conference registration form, pay at the conference
For more information, contact Al Cottingham: 218-8282-2309 or acottingham@ci.brainerd.mn.us
Hotel Information
This year's conference will be held at the Thunderbird Hotel and Convention Center in
Bloomington.
Single/Double occupancy rooms are available at the hotel for $86 a night ($6 extra for each
additional adult). A number of suites ate available for $145 a night. Rooms rates apply only
through September 14, 1999. It is very likely that the hotel will be fully booked at the time of
the conference, so plan accordingly and reserve your room early.
Reservations can be made by contacting the Thunderbird Hotel directly at 612-854-3411 or 1-
800-328-1931.
Please Note: since conference activities start early in the afternoon, not all rooms may be
available when you first arrive.
Directions: The Thunderbird is located between the airport and the Mall of America south of
highway 1-494. Take the 24th Avenue Exit (south) and turn right on east 78th Street. (Look for
the totem pole.)
For those of you not staying at the hotel, MnAP A will provide a suite to use on an as-available
basis to store items, freshen up, or change into appropriate dining, golfing, or biking gear.
Contact the conference registration table to gain access.
It. 3
IY'21
-
27th Annual Minnesota State Planning Conference
__,~,w,~.__..,.,."~,,,...,.___._~~w~,__.,='.'__._.' . __...., __.___"U,...,_"~=.~_'",Mm.---'. .___""_~_,_,__,""""_.___,.,,,'.'.___~'.W,,.___."",'"__...=,__.. ...__~__~W".~"="_.'_._""W"'_._-'-"---
-_.,~.
:99 MnAPA State Planning Conference Registration
This form is for conference rcgistration only. Lodging
reservations must be made by contacting the Thunderbird Hotel
directly at 1-800-328-1931. The deadline for reserving lodging at
the discounted conference rate is September 14, but reserve early to
be sure you get a room.
_ Early Registration by MnAPA members ~ includes all conference sessions
and meals (postmarked BEFORE 9/14/99)
_ Early Registration, NOT an MnAPA member ~ includes all conference
smions and meals (postmarked BEFORE 9/14/99)
_ All Registrations postmarked AFTER 9/14/99 and all purchase orders
~ includes all conference smions and meals
__ Wednesday Only (includes professional development workshops & reception)
_ Thursday Only (includes sessions, mobile tours, & three meals)
_ Friday Only (includes sessions and both meals)
_ Student or Planning Commissioner Discount (Deduct 50% from fee
for early or late - includes all conference Jessions and meals
member or nonmember registration, as applicable)
I would like to join MnAP A, the Minnesota Chapter of rhe American
Planning Association for one year and receive the discounted early registration rate. $
Sign me up for the mobile workshop(s) checked below. $
---' I would like an extra guest ticket(s) for Thursday evening's dinner $
nplete this form and return it with full payment. No charges
be accepted. The use of purchase orders will not be accepted
any of the reduced registration rates. Please use only one
stration form per person (you may copy this form as needed.)
ke checks payable to MoAPA. The deadline for early
istration is September 14, 1999.
Mail Conference Registration
and Payment to:
1999 MnAPA Planning Conference
c/o Cindy Carlsson
1080 Laurel Avenue
Saint Paul MN 55104-6537
Name:
Organization:
Address:
City, State, Zip:
Phone:
Questions? Call 651-229-0587
FAX or e-mail:
::gistration - Please mark the appropriate items.
Total Due $
$ 140
If you have a special meal
request, please contact
Cindy Carlsson.
$ 160
$ 180
$ 100
$ 120
$ 60
30
5 each
30
Golf Tournament
You must sign up in advance, but payment isn't due until you
register at the conference.
){obile Workshop Registration:
Please mark at least your first and second choices. Space is limited, so
lOur participation will be allotted as registrations are received. A tour
may be canceled if there is insufficient interest.
_ Planners' Golf Tournament, Dwan Golf Course
~ Hiawatha Corridor and Downtown Minneapolis
_ St. Paul Development
~ The Minneapolis Park System
_ The Airport: Operations, Expansion, and Issues
_ Main Street Revisited
It "
Government Training Service presents...
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING and COMPLIANCE WORKSHOP:
"LOOKING AT SUSTAINABILlTY"
Wednesday, September 29, 1999
8:30 - 9:00 a.m. (Check-in)
9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. (Workshop)
by paying attention to sustainable development today can we ensure that future generations living in our
,.unities will enjoy the quality of life we currently have. Environmental quality, an essential element in our quality
e, is a local responsibility. However, its scope and complexity can be daunting -- especially for community
:;rs and citizen planners!
workshop is designed to provide an overall framework needed to address current issues and provides practical
ils that will be useful in local decisionmaking. It covers all major federal and state environmental compliance
irements and ourlines environmental program management strategies to meet your environmental needs. This
se is an excellent foundation for developing your sustainable development program.
!cipants evaluating this new program (first presented in March, 1999 as part of Government Training Service's
_,s of land Use Planning Workshops) all recommended this program to other local elected officials, planning
missioners and staff.
learn
Environmental
Air Quality
Hazardous Material
Petroleum
Pesticides
Cultural Resources
Stewardship Principles and the Major Environmental
Water Quality
Hazardous Waste
Underground Storage Tanks
Above Ground Storage Tanks
land Use
Compliance Program Areas Including:
Solid Waste
Toxic Substances
Noise Pollution
Natural Resources
Brown Fields
learn Environmental Compliance Strategies, Self-Evaluation, Program Management, and "Significant" Trends.
learn How to Incorporate Environmental Standards into the Comprehensive Planning Process.
-
!"
PEC/ALlY FOR...
Planning commission members in cities, counties, townships
Elected officials in cities, counties, townships
Members of other local advisory commissions
Planning staff
Real estate professionals
Those involved with a local environmental issue who would like a broader perspective
~
ACUL TV:
VorkShop Leader: Ken Nimmer, has been certified by the National Institute of Environmental Professionals as
i Registered Environmental Manager. He is owner and founder of C & E Planning which specializes in
,nvironmental and community planning. Mr. Nimmer has over ten years of experience as a community planner,
=,nvironmental compliance auditor and environmental planner.
Joining Mr. Nimmer are...
Innar .sberg, Gunnar Isberg & Associates, who draws upon 30+ years of local government experience in
.-f\innesota as city elected official, planner, and planning commissioner.
Hannah Dunevitz, Regional Plant Ecologist, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, who specializes in
helping local governments and communities integrate ecological information into their planning and land stewardship
activities. '-
III
p.
GENERAL INFORMATION
p.
11\
';. liON:
eminar is being presented as a pre-conference
to the Minnesota Planning Association Annual
rence. While separate registration is required, like
onference it will be held in at the Best Western
derbird Hotel and Convention Center in
.ington, Minnesota (2201 East 78th Street,
~54-3411 ).
SIRA TION FEES:
eg'i;tration'f~~is$99/person which includes
:;on, refreshment breaks and handout materials.
:cial group discount of $85/person is available
registering three or more individuals. To qualify
lis discount, all registrations must be
ved in the same envelopel
.~TRA TIQ_~/C~~~!LL~ TIQJ~:
ster by September 15. (Space is limited.)
cate form if needed. You will not receive a
'mation of your registration, but we will notify you
, session is full. Fees will be refunded less a
service fee if the registration is canceled
-eptember 22. Substitutions for registered
:ipants may be made at any time.
FURTHER INFORMAnON:
Contact-Bri~nn~'-H;;~d~r-~r""'Jennifer Wozniak
(Registration) or Carol Schoeneck (Program Content)
at Government Training Service (651) 222-7409 or
Minnesota Toll Free (800) 569-6880.
WANT TO BE ON OUR MAILING L1sn
If )'~~do'~ot nor~~lIy'~ecei~~ ann~uncem~~t
brochures for the full winter/spring series of
GTS Land Use Planning Workshops but would
like to be put on the list, contad: Carol Schoeneck,
GTS, 480 Cedar Street, Suite 401, St. Paul,
Minnesota 55101-2240 (651/222-7409, extension
205; E-mail: cschoeneck@mngts.org). Brochures will
be mailed in January.
~
About Government
Training Service (GTS)
GTS is a public organization whose mission is to
provide innovative, comprehensive, practical training
and consulting to address the changing management
and leadership needs of policy makers, staff and
appointed officials in publicly funded organizations
in Minnesota.
----~~~~--~~~----~~~-----~~-----~~----~----~~----~----~~---~~---~~--~~~---~~--~~~--~~~--~~~-
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND COMPLIANCE WORKSHOP
Registration Form September 29, 1999
...
..,
Title
jiction
me Phone (_)
t Address
State/Zip
Fax (_)
How long In Position
trati~~_ Opt!c.!'s
Regular registration ($991 person)
Group registration ($85/person) NOTE: All registrations must be mailed in the same envelope I
l~nt O.2tio~~
Enclosed is our check (payable to Government Training Service) #
Please bill me at the above address for $ . , P.O. #
(An $8 billing charge will be added to the total amount owed.)
for $
~iI to: Registrar, Government Training Service, Suite 401, 480 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55101.2240
Register by September 15, 1999. t & ~
Planning Commission Agenda - 09/07/99
13. Consideration of sienine up for the Annual Planning Association Conference.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Report by Jeff 0 'N eill
SUPPORTING DATA
Registration Form
"
AUDIO CONFERENCE TRAINING SERIES
"Tightly packed hour
of information "
That's what planning oM.eials are saying about this series
that over 5,000 of yo Dr colleagues have attended.
Livable Communities and Sustainable Development
October 13, 1999
Land Use Regulation and the Freedom of Expression
December 1, 1999
Transfer of Development Rights Revisited
February 9, 2000
Urban Parks and Green Spaee
May 25, 2000
UII
LINCOLN pes
IN8TlTU'U
." UI'IP "OLley
" A
,'r;.'" I
'~'fl;I~~Js.<..
, l.#."~ 1\ .... ~1 'j;
'$IE~1It~r~~ . \ ...........
~'i' .. iB .~. '''''+
~.............1....'4.. .,,;"\ ..~. .f..r; .
" '\ . i'" .:- ,'" l!,l,~~
,">t . (' ...... 4
. . " ....''). .~ ., . it
. ,\,...' "p .:z~,.
. ~"""j } M
\',~ ' .. ...t' ,"~ti:'
'" If?: "
The American Planning
Association and the Lincoln
Institute of Land Policy have
the perfect up-to-the-minute
training that's both low-cost
and convenient.
Budget tight?
No fee increasc; same low price as 1998.
How does it work?
The audio conference is delivered to you live over a speaker telephone. All you do is assemble your group
around the phone and dial the 800 number provided to you when you register.
How many people can attend?
As many can attend as you want. You register for the phone line, not by the person. You can train an
entire council, board, or commission for as little as $80.
I'm really busy, how long does this take?
All programs are one hour in length. All are held on Wednesdays at 4:00 p.m. E.T. Each
program is scripted for an audio format and engages the listener in a lively discussion.
Can I ask questions of the speakers?
Yes. Fax them in ahead of time or ask them via thc telephone during the program.
What if I can't make that date?
Simple. You can purchase a tape and transcript of the program (see Option B on the registration form).
You'll get the tape of the live program, plus the transcript to listen to or read at your convenience. The
package can be used for future training as well.
Do I get anything else?
Yes. With your registration you receive reading materials, an agenda, and instructions on joining the pro-
gram and asking questions. Any questions not answered in the audio conference will be answered in The
Commissioner newsletter, mailed free of charge to all registrants.
For copies of agendas of the programs, call APA's 24-hour fax-on-demand service at 800-800-1589.
Request documents #3005 (information on how an audio conference works) and #3006 (program agen-
da). This information is also on APA's web site at www.planning.org/educ/audiocon.htm.
Additional questions?
Call Jerieshia Jones at 312-431-9100 or e-mail: liones@planning.org.
13 '5
Presenters include elected and appointed omcials~
planning dir(~ctors and staff~ land-use attorneys~ planning
consultants~ policy researchers~ and academic researchers
Livable Communities and
Sustainable Development
Livability is the buzz word of the moment-but what does it mean in practical terms?
The goal is for communities to achieve the perfect balance of a sound economy, attractiveness, amenities,
social concern, and environmental sensitivity. This program explores the meaning of these terms and
examines how livability and sustain ability are effectively integrated into community-level planning. From
brownfields to clean water and from affordable housing to better transportation options, learn what
communities are doing to actually achieve livability and sustainability.
O.otoher 13, I(J99
Land Use Regulation and the
Freedom of Expression
This program explores the community's obligation to address issues of freedom of religion and free
expression. Constitutional law on these subjects is ever-changing. While communities may not like their
adult use businesses or big box houses of worship, do they have the right to regulate? As technology
changes and as ethnic and religious populations change, community governance needs to adjust. In this
program, we'll explore the role of planning and the legal obligations of communities in this challenging
environment.
nec(~mlu"r I, 1999
I;'("bruary 9, 2000
Transfer of Development Rights Revisited
TDR is a tool that has been around for some time. It started as a historic preservation tool in densely
populated urban areas, but has been expanded for use in the conservation of agricultural lands and
critically sensitive areas. Learn where this tool fits in the toolbox of community incentive programs. In
this timely discussion, panelists will assess how well this tool has worked over time, in what situations it's
most useful, and the potential it holds for helping communities preserve valuable resources and grow
intelligently.
--U~ba~ Parks and Green Space I
Are they a bellwether of community health? How are changing recreational habits, neighborhood
demographics, and city budgets affecting parks? Panelists explore the array of park and green space
planning being conducted in urban areas. Find out what innovative approaches are being used for
consensus building, design, park definition, environmental planning, and sustainable management and
financing. Explore the relationship between parks and the community's economic development. This
program will draw on a current APA research initiative on urban parks.
May 25, 2000
,~ ~
AUDIO CONFERENCE THAINING SERIES
REGISTER EARLY AND SAVE!
Early registration deadline is September 17, 1999
Ilplete form and mail to:
American Planning Association
Lock Box 94343
Chicago, IL 60678-4343
312-431-9985
~ax to (credit card and purchase orders only):
UO NOT MAIL YOUR Rf:(;ISTlIA'I'ION AFl'lm SI~PTJ<;MBlm II; (<'AX ONLY
o;gistration Information:
NAIIIE
TITLE
OF ORGANIZATION OR AGENCY
,I; ADDRESS
STATE
ZIP
FAX
gistration Fees:
;08 A: Audio Conference Only
(live audio conference and course book)
o Livable Communities, October 13, 1999
o Land Use Regulation, December I, 1999
o Development Rights, February 9, 2000
o Urban Parks and Green Space, May 25, 2000
o All four programs (special savings)
Defore
Sept. 17, 1999
$80
$80
$80
$80
$280
After
Sept. 17, 1999
$100
$100
$100
$100
$320
onB:
Audio Conferences and Tape Packages
(Live audio conference, tape, transcript, and course book)
o Livable Communities, October 13, 1999
o Land Use Regulation, December I , 1999
o Development Rights, f'ebruary 9, 2000
o Urban Parks and Green Space, May 25, 2000
o All four programs (special savings)
$130
$130
$130
$130
$440
$110
$]]0
$110
$1l0
$400
( mnount:
$
$ 00______00
registration that is canceled is assessed a $20 fee. Cancellations must be received in writing.
~hod of payment:
o Check enclosed (payable to APA)
o Visa
o Purchase order (copy must be attached)
o MasterCard
_'lIIllER
EXPIRATION IJAn:
CARll HOLDER
SIGNATURE OF CARll HOWER
., ))