Loading...
Planning Commission Minutes 02-03-2010Planning Commission Minutes — 2/3/10 MINUTES MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, February 3, 2010 5:00 PM Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Rod Dragsten, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, William Spartz, Barry Voight Council Liaison: Susie Wojchouski Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman — NAC Call to order. Chairman Dragsten called the meeting to order. 2. Consideration to annrove Planning Commission minutes of December lst, 2009. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SPARTZ TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 1st, 2009. MOTION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HILGART. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0. 3. Citizen comments. None. 4. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. None. 5. Housing Analysis Update. Angela Schumann indicated that City staff would be able to provide the housing analysis data required by the Planning Commission as it begins to consider future growth projections. She noted that staff will access internal sources, state demographer data, and anecdotal sources such as real estate owners and brokers to document current housing statistics. Information will be available on: current housing inventory and the total number of housing units broken down by housing type and occupancy (single, multi- family, senior complexes). Staff would conduct a lot inventory to determine the number of final platted lots as well as the number of preliminary platted lots. Statistics would also be available on: the status of the total ratio of built -out lots to lots available; the number of built -outs which are owner occupied and which are vacant; the number vacant and for sale; the number in the foreclosure process; the number of rental units; and the rental unit vacancy ratios. After this analysis is completed, staff would take a look at market absorption, the average time on market for the various segments of housing type and average sale prices. Planning Commission Minutes — 2/3/10 Chairman Dragsten asked when the analysis would be completed. Schumann indicated that the project could possibly wrap up by the end of March. She pointed out that the advantage of gathering the information in house, rather than contracting with a consultant for the research, is that City staff could provide a baseline of information which would be accessible to be modified for future analysis. 6. Consideration to review a request for extension of a Conditional Use Permit for Concept Stage Planned Unit Development f� or Kiellberg Estates Applicant: Ocello, LLC Schumann noted that this project was originally approved in 2005 and has been extended in one year increments due to market conditions. Staff has determined that because the project is conceptual in nature, much more information would be determined at the development stage, and the Commission would look more closely at it at that time. Staff recommended approval of the extension. She indicated that the applicant has a representative available to speak on behalf of this extension request. Commissioner Voight asked if there would be a point at which, when extension requests are received, the Planning Commission would instead take a look at the Comprehensive Plan and say no to further extensions. Schumann responded that this project is still in concept form, and since the City is generally in favor of mixed use development, it might be best to wait and see what develops into plan. Chairman Dragsten agreed that the Commission doesn't have a clear direction as to how to proceed other than to continue to wait out the undetermined market conditions. Commissioner Spartz wondered what this might mean for other concept plans and considered amending the ordinance with a five year limit to extensions. Council Liaison Susie Wojchouski indicated that Taco Johns is in the wrong location on the map of the project. Schumann noted that the applicant could revise that as the project was developed. Commissioner Hilgart asked if the City would be looking at park dedication for concept plans that have been approved. Schumann stated that the applicant should note that park dedication standards have been changed significantly in terms of the amount that is required per unit. She indicated that she'd have to look at the acreage to see what was incorporated in the parkland calculation of the concept plan. She also pointed out that Council direction has been to consolidate parks. Commissioner Hilgart asked if this project could be plugged into the new PUD formula. Schumann suggested that the City could look into that. Applicant representative Charlie Pfeffer spoke about the request for extension. He stated that although the market is improving, it would determine the pace of any action taken in the concept plan. He said it all comes down to price. He noted that they monitor the whole I -94 corridor each month to determine if it would be appropriate to move forward Planning Commission Minutes — 2/3/10 with projects. He stated that sitting on a development project would be worse than sitting on raw land. He noted that this property had been annexed to the city. He indicated that the applicant would definitely not be requesting additional density for this concept plan. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HILGART TO RECOMMEND A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF THE SEPTEMBER 12`h, 2005 CUP FOR CONCEPT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR KJELLBERG ESTATES WITH THE CONDITION THAT ALL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITIONS BE ASSIGNED TO THE EXTENSION. MOTION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SPARTZ. MOTION CARRIED. 5 -0. 7. Agenda Cable Posting Update. Schumann provided an update about arranging for the Planning Commission agenda to be posted on the cable access channel in advance of meetings. Schumann indicated that she had spoken with the Community Center Director who noted that, although she is aware of the request, that the process involved in making this happen takes more time than one would think. Schumann stated that the City will be looking at hiring an Administrative Assistant and that this is a task that this new position would take on so the Commission can expect to see agendas posted to cable access in the near term. Chairman Dragsten suggested that it would help get the information out there to the public. Community Development Director's Report. Schumann pointed out that a citizen had stopped in with some constructive criticism about how the City notifies residents about ordinance amendments. She used the example of the recent update of the off - street parking ordinance to note the varied ways in which the City currently provides notice of information to the public. She indicated that the City issues press releases, notices in the Shopper, posts information online, posts notices on the bulletin board regarding the public meetings, and often offers meetings prior to public hearings to get the word out. She again agreed that people don't always have access to those resources and that the City should look to providing opportunity for citizens to provide input prior to posting an ordinance that affects every resident in the city. She suggested that the City take that into consideration when budgeting for public communication for the coming year. She noted that the City was able to provide a solution to this citizen's particular parking issue. Schumann also gave the Commission an update about the award of a $400,000 grant to available to the Bertram Chain of Lakes through the Legacy program. The City has been notified that it is a potential candidate for another $250,000 grant through Metro Greenways. She confirmed that grant money needs to be matched by the city and county and would go for acquisition rather than capital improvements. She noted that elected officials would be meeting to discuss budgeting for this in the near term. Planning Commission Minutes — 2/3/10 Schumann stated that the funding structure is predicated on matching one third from state, one third from county, one third from city. Each jurisdiction must come up with the $400,000 match. This would be on top of the $266,499 that the City already received. The City would be asked to match a little less than one million as their one third share for the next acquisition. Finance Director will look at all of the options such as what funds are available in the CIP, what funds are available in park dedication, and at how Wright County wants to proceed as well. She confirmed that if the city can't come up with money, they'd lose the grant. She also noted that funding is fiercely competitive and if the City chooses not to accept grants awarded to make a purchase, future grants would be unlikely. In addition, she noted that those decisions affect future bonding requests in the eyes of the legislature. 9. Adjourn. I Tu [ � 7 � [ � ] � i � Z K � ] i • I �Y .� C�) � I � 1 a � I � � [ e f : X11 I C � Z: � I � 1 I J : 7 ► � MOTION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SPARTZ. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0. The meeting was adjourned at 5:25 p.m. Angela Angela $cl}hr4anh, Community Development Director El