City Council Minutes 04-28-2014MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, April 28, 2014 — 7 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Present: Clint Herbst, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta, Brian Stumpf
Absent: None
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Herbst called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. and declared a quorum present. The
Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
2. Approval of Minutes — April 14, 2014 Regular Meeting
LLOYD HILGART MOVED TO ACCEPT THE APRIL 14, 2014 REGULAR
MEETING MINUTES AS PRESENTED. TOM PERRAULT SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
• Rental Housing compliance (Glen Posusta)
• Public Transit update (Jeff O'Neill)
• Sound in Council Chambers (Tom Perrault)
4. Citizen comments, public service announcements
A. Citizen Comments: None
B. Public Service Announcements:
1) Monticello Recycling Day (5/3) — Jason Warhime of Metro Appliance
Recycling spoke about the upcoming recycling day on Saturday, May 3 from
8 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the commuter lot. He mentioned the various items that can
be recycled. Brian Stumpf noted there is a small fee for many of the items,
similar to when the city held Junk Amnesty Day. Warhime mentioned that the
city has information on their website and he has also advertised on Think
Green website. Clint Herbst noted that this event is open to city residents as
well as others outside of the city. Brian Stumpf asked if there were any
thoughts of doing something in the fall. Warhime said that the numbers last
year did not justify holding it in the fall. He is going to look at the numbers
again and then would notify the city if it would warrant.
2) Bertram Clean-Up Day (5/3) - Angela Schumann reminded community
volunteers of the Clean-up Day at Bertram on Saturday, May 3rd from 10 a.m.
to noon. Bring work gloves and heavy boots.
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 1
3) Clint Herbst reminded residents of the National Day of Prayer this Thursday,
May 1' at noon. Will be held inside the community center in case of
inclement weather.
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Consideration of approving payment of bills for April 28t`. THIS ITEM WAS
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments. THIS
ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
C. Consideration of approving an application for temporary on -sale liquor license for
the Monticello Lions Club for their Brewfest event on August 16, 2014.
Recommendation: Approve the application for temporary on -sale liquor license
for the Monticello Lions Club for Brewfest on August 16, 2014.
D. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing exclusive use of
West Bridge Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Brewfest event
on August 16, 2014. Applicant: Monticello Lions Club. Recommendation:
Approve a Special Event Permit for the Monticello Lions Club for Brewfest on
August 16, 2014, allowing exclusive use of West Bridge Park and related
assistance from Public Works.
E. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014 -040 accepting improvements and
authorizing final payment to Gertken Brothers, Inc. for the Great River Trailways
and Trailhead Improvements, City Project No. l OCO10. THIS ITEM WAS
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
F. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014 -039 approving a Final Stage Planned
Unit Development adjustment for Sunset Ponds Townhomes entrance
monuments. Applicant: Sunset Ponds I Townhome Association.
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution #2014 -039 approving a Final Stage PUD
adjustment for Sunset Ponds I Townhome Association for two entrance
monuments and approving associated encroachment agreement, subject to
conditions of approval as follows.
Applicant provide documentation from United Power (or successor) that
proposed sign placement within its powerline easement is permitted.
Applicant enter into a license agreement with the City of Monticello for
encroachment into the City's drainage and utility easements.
Sign plans shall be submitted for permits in accordance with sign ordinance
allowances and processing, with the allowance for two area identification signs.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE
REMOVAL OF ITEMS A, B, AND E. TOM PERRAULT SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 2
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion
5A. Consideration of approving payment of bills for April 281h
Glen Posusta pulled this item because he questioned several items. Some paint was
purchased at a cost of $45 per gallon; Wayne Oberg will check on that and let Glen know
what the paint was for. Glen Posusta also asked about the Spectrum payment for hand
wash and hair and body wash. Wayne Oberg explained the Spectrum order included a
number of different items that were purchased in bulk and could be quantities for use
over the year; he is working with the MCC Director to determine average costs on some
of these items and see if items could be purchased under the state purchasing system.
Glen Posusta also questioned satellite dish service for Sirius XM radio for MCC. Wayne
Oberg noted that the MCC Director is in the process of working with FiberNet to see if
there are other options.
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF THE BILL AND
PURCHASE CARD REGISTERS FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $542,105.43, AND
DIRECTED STAFF TO CHECK ON THE BILLING QUESTIONS. LLOYD
HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
5B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments
Glen Posusta wanted to know why the Parks Department is hiring so many seasonal
employees; he thought it was supposed to be limited to four seasonal. Jeff O'Neill will
check on that and let him know.
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED TO RATIFY THE NEW HIRES AND TERMINATIONS
FOR STREETS, FIBERNET, FINANCE, WATER, MCC AND PARKS, SUBJECT TO
A CLARIFICATION ON THE PARKS SEASONAL EMPLOYEES. TOM
PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
5E. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014 -040 accepting improvements and
authorizing final payment to Gertken Brothers, Inc. for the Great River Trailways and
Trailhead Improvements, City Project No. 100010
Glen Posusta pulled this off because the final payment to Gertken Brothers brings the
total project above the amount of the original bid. He wanted to know why the contract
amount was increased to cover the fill material that was needed. He felt the contractor
should have been aware of this and included it in their bid to bring in fill materials.
Shibani Bisson explained that the original bid was based on estimated quantities based on
assumptions of adequate topsoil and sand in the trail areas. Soil borings were not done,
and it was assumed there was adequate topsoil and sand on the project to balance the
grading. When it was found that there was excess topsoil with the pond excavation and
not enough sand, the contractor excavated additional sand material from the ponds to use
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 3
as fill for the trail areas Shibani noted that there were allowances built in to the scope of
the contract to accommodate this.
Brian Stumpf questioned why this would not have been brought to Council as a change
order. Shibani Bisson explained that the additional excavation was within the scope of
the project, so was not brought forward as a change order. Bret Weiss commented that
situations like this can be brought to Council's attention in the future. Lloyd Hilgart
confirmed that the contractor performed according to the scope of the work that was bid,
including the excavation and filling, and should be compensated accordingly.
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION #2014 -040 ACCEPTING
IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT OF $20,099.37 TO
GERTKEN BROTHERS FOR GREAT RIVER TRAILWAYS AND TRAILHEAD
IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. l OCO10, SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF ALL
DOCUMENTS LISTED IN THE RESOLUTION. TOM PERRAULT SECONDED
THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
7. Regular Agenda:
A. Public Hearing — Hillside 3rd & 4d' Public Improvements and Assessment Roll:
1) Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014 -041 ordering the improvements
for Hillside Farm 3rd & 0' Additions Public Improvements, City Project No.
12CO08
2) Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014 -042 approving an assessment roll
for Hillside Farm 3rd & 4t' Addition Public Improvements, City Project No.
12CO08 and certifying the assessment roll to the County Auditor for
placement on the tax forfeit parcels
Shibani Bisson explained that the public hearing includes the improvement and
assessment hearing related to the Hillside Farm 3rd and 0 Public Improvements.
Shibani Bisson reviewed the existing conditions: 47 lots under tax forfeiture,
owned by the state, scheduled for public auction by the County in late summer,
and unbuildable lots until public improvements are completed. The proposed
improvements remaining for these two additions include: the second lift of the
roads, sidewalk, trail extensions, utility adjustments, and cluster mailboxes.
Clint Herbst asked about the amount of the existing assessments and what would
happen to them. Shibani summarized the existing assessment amounts on the lots
and the process for recovering those and indicated that she would be covering it in
more detail when she goes over the assessment process later in the presentation.
Shibani Bisson pointed out that the city has obtained a trail easement across Lot 1,
Block 1, Hillside Farm 3rd, and that has been recorded. (Council will be asked in
an upcoming meeting to add this parcel to the tax forfeit auction list.) Shibani
Bisson also noted that the 10 foot retaining wall that was originally planned on the
north side of 5 to 6 lots in Hillside Farm 3rd is not included with the plans for the
City Council Minutes — April 28, 2014 Page 4
project and that the builder or developer will need to construct these walls to
address the grades and protect the trees to the north.
Shibani Bisson mentioned that the City might want to recommend having the tax
forfeit lots be bid as one lot at public auction. The County will hold a valuation
hearing where the final determination for the sale process will be made. Clint
Herbst suggested that at least the 5 to 6 lots that need a retaining wall could be bid
in a lot. Glen Posusta suggested that it might be better to leave those lots be bid
individually rather than as a group. Glen Posusta asked Shawn Weinand what he
thought, and Shawn said it would probably result in a nicer development if the
lots were all sold to one developer. Lloyd Hilgart feels that the standards that the
City has in place for residential housing will ensure that developers build nice
homes on these lots. Lloyd Hilgart stated that the auction would probably
generate more money per lot if sold individually.
Shibani Bisson discussed the project cost of $208,000, which is based on the bid
price and includes indirect and contingency costs. The proposed special
assessment on each lot would amount to $4,425. The city would fund the project
through the Capital Project fund and reimburse itself when these new assessments
are paid after the lots are sold at auction.
Shibani Bisson went on to explain that there are existing assessments on all of
these lots, which were cancelled at the time the lots went tax forfeit. The city is
not guaranteed to receive payment on the cancelled assessments from the auction
sale. Angela Schumann explained that it is staff's intent to have any uncollected
portion of cancelled assessments recertified. It would be the intent of the city to
make that clear to Wright County prior to the valuation hearing, and the County
has indicated they would, in turn, convey that information at the time lots are
purchased from the auction sale.
Glen Posusta asked if the city should place a bid on all these lots at the auction to
ensure a minimum price to cover all of the existing assessments. Wayne Oberg
explained that the State Auditor has determined there is not a public purpose in
purchasing developable property for resale, and the city would not be allowed to
bid.
Shibani Bisson reviewed the action items to be taken tonight: open the public
hearing, close the public hearing, and consider motions on Decision #1 and
Decision #2.
Glen Posusta questioned what would happen if the lots sold for less than the
amount of the old and new assessments, since the old assessments have been
removed. Angela Schumann explained that the city will notify the County that we
intend to recertify for any unpaid or uncollected assessments. Angela stated that
staff would need to work with the City Attorney to understand how that re-
certification process will work. Staff noted that it is their understanding via
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 5
conversations with the County that each lot will have a starting market value
determined by the county which would include the new assessment amount, and
that becomes the starting bid price at the auction (the bid cannot go lower than
that). It is hoped that the city can recover some of the existing assessments if the
lot values are set high enough to include those amounts; however, the calculation
of the settlement would not be determined until after the auction is completed.
Mayor Herbst opened the public hearing. As there were no comments, the public
hearing was closed.
Decision #1:
LLOYD HILGART MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 ADOPTING
RESOLUTION #2014 -041 ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR
HILLSIDE FARM 3RD AND 4TH ADDITION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS,
CITY PROJECT NO. 12C008. TOM PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
Decision #2:
LLOYD HILGART MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 ADOPTING
RESOLUTION #2014 -042 APPROVING AN ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
HILLSIDE FARM 3RD & 4TH ADDITION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, CITY
PROJECT NO. 12CO08 AND CERTIFYING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL TO
THE WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR FOR PLACEMENT ON THE TAX
FORFEIT PARCELS. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
B. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014 -043 accepting bids and awarding the
contract for Hillside Farm Yd & 4d' Additions Public Improvements, City Project
No. 12CO08
Shibani Bisson presented the proposed improvements for Hillside Farm 3 & 4 and
the bid results. ASTECH Corp was the low bidder at $154,568.25, compared to
the Engineer's Opinion at $187,052.74. References were checked and it is
recommended to award the project to ASTECH. The project is to be completed
by August 2014.
Clint Herbst confirmed that the project would probably be substantially completed
before the county holds the auction. If necessary, the city could make
adjustments if the assessment amounts would be affected.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 ADOPTING
RESOLUTION #2014 -043 ACCEPTING THE BIDS AND AWARDING THE
CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, ASTECH CORP.
IN THE AMOUNT OF $154,568.25 FOR HILLSIDE FARM 3RD & 4TH
ADDITION PUBLIC IMPROVMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 12C008. LLOYD
HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 6
C. Consideration of approving Final Stage Planned Unit Development for a K -12
Educational Institution in an R -3 (Medium Density Residence) District and CCD
(Central Community District), adopting Ordinance #592 for rezoning to Planned
Unit Development, and adopting Resolution #2014 -044 approving PUD and
Development Agreement. Applicant: Miller Eric /SRCS Building Company
o/b /o Swan River Montessori
Steve Grittman summarized this item for Council and reviewed the process
leading up to this request. Council had previously approved the Concept Stage
PUD for Swan River subject to conditions. Steve Grittman went through the
Conditions of Approval associated with Final Stage PUD for the applicant. Steve
Grittman pointed out that the condition concerning the pedestrian crossing at
Maple Street has not been resolved, with staff recommending the crossing at the
corner of 5 %2 and Maple Streets rather than mid -block as Swan River prefers.
Brian Stumpf stated that he does not like the mid -block crossing and wondered if
the bump outs could be changed. Clint Herbst noted that, with the crossing at the
corner, it would serve as a typical crossing for the general public as well as the
school. Brian Stumpf said he thinks it would be safer to have the crossing at the
corner, especially during the times when deliveries are being made. Glen Posusta
indicated that students would likely take the shortest route. Steve Grittman noted
that Swan River states the students would have teachers or crossing guards
present whenever a group goes across.
Glen Posusta asked if the roof is a green- colored roof as shown in the drawings
and inquired about the purpose of the cupola. Steve Grittman said that the design
review concentrated on pitch and style rather than color so he wasn't sure. Eric
Miller from Swan River indicated that the actual roof color will be black and grey
tones. Steve Grittman pointed out that the cupolas were added by the applicant
based on staff's recommendation to add additional roof character or break -up.
Clint Herbst commented that he had received a query from one person wanting to
know how much of the property would be done in native landscapes. Steve
Grittman and Eric Miller confirmed that the entire area, other than buildings and
sidewalks, will be native landscapes. Clint Herbst asked if there would be
students playing on the natural areas and if that creates additional maintenance.
Eric Miller said that the students would continue to use the existing playground
that is situated on astro (artificial) turf.
Glen Posusta asked if Swan River had considered locating the new building
further to the south so that the entry would then line up with a crosswalk located
at the corner. Eric Miller explained that was not possible with the drainage they
were trying to accomplish with native landscaping. Eric Miller explained they
preferred to have the crosswalk maintained in the middle of the block so that
students can line up inside the current building and straight across from the new
building entrance. They felt this would be safer for the students. Glen Posusta
stated that he does not necessarily oppose a crosswalk in the middle; however
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 7
there should be a safety measure in place such as a raised crosswalk to slow the
traffic. Lloyd Hilgart commented that if there is not a lot of traffic, it probably
doesn't matter exactly where the crosswalk is placed. He feels the issue is getting
traffic to stop for pedestrians in the crosswalk.
Clint Herbst reiterated his concern about the native landscaping. Eric Miller said
that they will be working with Minnesota Native Landscapes, a company that has
created native landscaping for other schools. This company will also be handling
the landscape maintenance on an ongoing basis.
Jeff O'Neill commented that students would be crossing not only two lanes of
traffic, but would pass through the bump -outs where vehicles might be parking.
Shibani Bisson commented that vehicles in the parking bays pose an obstruction
to vehicles turning from 5 1 /2th Street to north bound Maple Street and the same
goes for pedestrians crossing the proposed mid -block crossing that may not see
vehicles turning onto Maple Street. The proposed mid -block crossing also poses
a longer path for pedestrians to cross as opposed to narrowing the path, which is
typical for mid -block crossings. She noted that placement of the crosswalk at the
corner would be more typical and would fit public use outside of school hours.
Clint Herbst stated that he agrees with placement of the crosswalk at the corner;
the public expects to go to a corner to cross the road. He also wants to see some
green space in the front of the building and not just native landscapes.
Decision #1
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 APPROVING THE
FINAL STAGE PUD, WITH A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK AT THE
CORNER OF 5%2 STREET AND MAPLE STREET AND WITH REVISIONS
TO THE NATIVE LANDSCAPING PLAN TO INCLUDE TRADITIONAL
GRASS IN FRONT OF THE FRONT BUILDING LINE, SUBJECT TO
CONDITIONS LISTED AS FOLLOWS. GLEN POSUSTA SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
• The pitch of the roof over the new entry should be increased to mirror the pitch
on the existing school building fagade.
• The applicant shall adhere to tree protections standards provided in Chapter 4
Section 4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance (no tree protection currently provided).
• The applicant provide a maintenance plan for of seed mixes & shrub /tree
plantings (removal of invasives or weeds, and replacement of any dead
specimens).
• The applicants will need to mark the final plan set with a notation reflecting this
design requirement.
• The proposed grading, drainage, and erosion control measures are subject to
review and approval by the City Engineer. The applicants are required to
adhere to any recommendations from the City Engineer as a condition of PUD
approval. The applicants have been working with the engineer on meeting these
requirements. A stormwater plan showing the required calculations is still
forthcoming as apart of this review.
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 8
• Staff is recommending the following conditions apply to the crosswalk,
regardless of location:
a. Signage is added to note loading /unloading only in the existing "bump -
in " aisle east of Maple.
b. Signage is added to limit parking in the proposed "bump -in " west of
Maple for a maximum of 15 minutes.
c. Cross -walks are marked with grind -in poly pre form construction.
d. Crosswalk is marked with a blinking push- button sign visible to both
directions of Maple Street traffic that meets the requirements of the City
Engineer.
If the City Council requires the corner location at 5th Street (Alternative 1), the
City would be responsible for maintenance since it would be more likely to serve
the broader community. Speed zones would not be necessary with the corner
location, and signage would differ somewhat (although the blinking sign is still
recommended).
• Complete and submit Final Stage PUD documents consistent with the required
conditions of approval for inclusion in the final PUD ordinance and development
contract.
• Execution of a development contract securing the required improvements.
Decision #2
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 ADOPTING
ORDINANCE NO. 592 FOR REZONING SWAN RIVER MONTESSORI
SCHOOL TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BASED ON THE
FINDINGS LISTED IN THE ORDINANCE. LLOYD HILGART SECONDED
THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
Decision #3
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 ADOPTING
RESOLUTION #2014 -044 APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR SWAN RIVER CHARTER
SCHOOL, WITH ADJUSTMENTS BASED ON DECISION #1 AND #2.
LLOYD HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
D. Consideration of authorizing staff to pursue options for providing a loan and
extending term of existing financing to Swan River Building Committee for Swan
River Montessori school expansion
Jeff O'Neill introduced this item and asked Council to authorize staff to look into
possible options to loan $100,000 to Swan River Building Committee to assist
with their expansion. In exchange, Swan River would allow use of some portions
of the new building through the MCC. Jeff O'Neill pointed out that Swan River
currently uses the MCC facilities for its students and would continue to do this for
the life of the loan including the extended years.
Jeff O'Neill mentioned several options such as a revolving loan through the EDA,
a business subsidy, or some other type of financial assistance. All of these would
have to be reviewed by city financial and legal advisors to make sure that this
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 9
would comply with state law. Jeff O'Neill noted that, if Council does not wish to
pursue this, Swan River would need to look at traditional bank financing.
Tom Perrault commented that EDA requirements usually requires job creation,
and he doesn't see that this expansion would create jobs. Eric Miller stated that
Swan River has doubled its number of jobs since they opened but may not create
additional jobs with this expansion. Clint Herbst asked if they have talked to a
bank about financing. Eric Miller said they are working with their bankers.
However, they felt it would be advantageous to work with the city again since
their current contract for deed expires in 10 years. If the city would enter into a
financing agreement again, the City would have the right of first refusal on the
new building.
Brian Stumpf doesn't feel that the city should be involved in loaning money.
Glen Posusta does not consider this request to be appropriate at this time. He
agreed with the original loan due to the circumstances at that time. However, he
doesn't feel the city should be providing banking services.
Lloyd Hilgart asked about the use of the new building by the community center.
Eric Miller suggested that this would be a good situation for both Swan River and
the city in that the city would gain revenues for long term use of MCC facilities
by Swan River in exchange for providing financing to Swan River. The city
would also gain the interest payments on a loan over time.
Clint Herbst recommended that the city at least take a look at the options available
and have legal consultants take a look to make sure this is a viable plan. Glen
Posusta suggested that the city may want to look at an amount closer to $50,000
to $60,000 or enough to cover the amount that Swan River needs to meet the
banking criteria on their loan ratio. Tom Perrault pointed out that the revenues
from Swan River are not clear profit because the city still has expenses involved
when Swan River uses the community center.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 AUTHORIZING STAFF
TO WORK WITH THE SWAN RIVER BUILDING COMMITTEE IN
RESEARCHING OPTIONS FOR REFINANCING OF EXISTING DEBT ON A
CONTRACT FOR DEED WITH AN ADDITIONAL $100,000 LOAN. LLOYD
HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2014 -045 amending the Monticello
Comprehensive Plan, Chanter 3 — Land Use as related to gpiding principles and
locations for future high density housing. Applicant: City of Monticello
Steve Grittman explained that Council is asked to consider amending the
Comprehensive Plan to accommodate principles and locations for high density
housing related to R -4 zoning. This issue was brought forward for additional
discussion following the denial of IRET rezoning of a parcel to R -4. The
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 10
Planning Commission and City Council met in joint session to discuss how to
better guide potential options or criteria for R -4 zoning districts for future
development. Following that discussion, the Planning Commission held a public
hearing on April 1, 2014, and reviewed proposed amendments to the
comprehensive plan related to more detailed guiding principles for multiple
family residential development and R -4 district locations and adopted a resolution
of recommendation to the Council in that regard.
Steve Grittman summarized the factors and principles and went through the items
to be incorporated into Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 ADOPTING
RESOLUTION #2014 -045 TO AMEND THE MONTICELLO
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CHAPTER 3 — LAND USE TO INCORPORATE
FACTORS AND PRINCIPLES INTO THE CODE TO MANAGE AND
DIRECT THE LOCATIONS FOR FUTURE HIGH DENSITY HOUSING
AREA (NOTED WITH UNDERLINING AS FOLLOWS). LLOYD HILGART
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
"A complete housing stock includes higher density residential areas that consist of
multi family housing types such as apartments and condominiums. In the near term,
the Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate expanding the existing supply of higher
density housing. It is likely that Monticello will need additional higher density
housing to:
➢ Provide housing suited to the needs of an aging population.
➢ Facilitate redevelopment in the Downtown or in other appropriate locations
of the community.
➢ Provide housing needed to attract the workforce required to achieve
economic development goals of the City
Higher density residential land uses should be located and designed to be
compatible with nearby residential or mixed uses, on lots able to accommodate
larger buildings and added tra zc generation. In addition, siting factors for him
density residential uses will prioritize access to services and amenities including
public utilities, parks, trails and open space, and commercial and /or medical
services. It will be important, when considering potential designation ofhigh
density housing development, that the parcels meet the specific standards o the
zoning district, and such development can be accommodated in accordance with
the policies in this Plan. "
While these comments and the comments in the zoning ordinance are intended to be
instructive they are not necessarily the only factors that might come into play on
s�eci is properties.
F. Consideration of adopting Ordinance No. 594 amending the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 4(I) as related to ug iding principles and locations
City Council Minutes — April 28, 2014 Page 11
for future R -4 (Medium-High Density Residence) zoning districts. Applicant:
City of Monticello
Steve Grittman explained that this item would amend the Monticello Zoning Code
to incorporate principles and locations for future R -4 zoning districts, acting as a
companion to the comprehensive plan principles. This is designed to create
standards for higher density housing and establish criteria for consideration when
a request is brought forward.
Lloyd Hilgart commented that he does not necessarily favor rezoning parcels
unless a developer actually brings a request forward. He inquired whether the city
has or could indicate areas where there is a potential for different zoning uses that
would be allowed. Angela Schumann explained that the previous PZM district,
which is now an overlay district, does allow for some mixing of uses. The overlay
accounts for specific or unique performance standards in a certain zoning district.
Steve Grittman explained that it would be possible to identify land use areas on
the zoning map that could be eligible for multiple zoning uses, but it would not be
part of the Comp Plan in its current structure.
Tom Perrault commented about multi -story buildings in the downtown area that
have commercial uses on the street level and apartments above, and asked how
those are zoned with the mixed uses. Angela Schumann said those are zoned as
CCD, which is unique to the downtown area. She also noted that there is a
transition area at the edge of the CCD district.
LLOYD HILGART MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 ADOPTING
ORDINANCE NO. 594 AMENDING THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE TO
INCORPORATE R -4 ZONING DISTRICT FACTORS AND PRINCIPLES
INTO SECTION 3.4(I) — MEDIUM -HIGH DENSITY RESIDENCE DISTRICT
TO MANAGE AND DIRECT THE LOCATIONS FOR FUTURE R -4 AREAS.
TOM PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
Clint Herbst asked about the process if Council wanted to call for a public hearing
to change zoning for an R -4 district from "places to work" to "places to live."
Steve Grittman explained that could be done by a council motion.
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AT THE NEXT
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
REZONING OF DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY LOCATED WESTERLY OF
FREEWAY FIELDS. GLEN POSUSTA SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
Steve Grittman noted that the City would need to publish notice with appropriate
legals for the property to be rezoned.
City Council Minutes —April 28, 2014 Page 12
8. Added Items
Sound issues in the Mississippi Room — Tom Perrault asked if there could be
some work done to find ways to improve the sound for council meetings. Clint
Herbst directed staff to look into that.
Rental Code compliance — Glen Posusta noted that the Council Connection report
indicates there were a number of people out of compliance with the rental
ordinance. He was wondering if the legal costs incurred by the city could be
added to their rental fees. Lloyd Hilgart noted that the City of St. Cloud doubles
the fees if you are late in registering your rental property. Jeff O'Neill will look
into this.
River Rider transition — Jeff O'Neill explained that River Rider will be
discontinuing service as of June 301. Wright County has been looking into
transitioning service to Trailblazer Transit as of July 11. This is still in process
and issues have to be worked out yet before an agreement can be reached. Jeff
O'Neill noted that the city provided up to 14,000 rides each year at one time
through public transit and is working with MnDOT to ensure that this service can
be continued.
• Turf Aerator purchase — Wayne Oberg explained that Tom Pawelk had located a
used Toro turf aerator on Craigslist.org, The aerator is in good condition for an
excellent price of $800, and he put a hold on it. This equipment's current value is
$4,000 and has to be purchased Tuesday in order to get it at the $800 price.
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED TO PURCHASE A TORO TURF AERATOR
FROM PRO LAWN AT A COST OF $800. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED
THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
9. Adjournment
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:06 P.M. TOM
PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
Recorder: Catherine M. Shuman 1N4/
Approved: May 12, 2014
Attest: e,16,eli
Cit strator
City Council Minutes — April 28, 2014 Page 13