The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 05-23-2011AGENDA REGULARMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL Monday,May23,2011–7p.m. Mayor:ClintHerbst CouncilMembers:LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta,BrianStumpf 1.CalltoOrderandPledgeofAllegiance 2A.ApprovalofMinutes–May9,2011RegularMeeting 3.Considerationofaddingitemstotheagenda 4.Citizencomments,publicserviceannouncements,andstaffupdates a.CitizenComments: b.PublicServiceAnnouncements: 1)BertramFamilyFunDay(6/11) 2)Walk&Roll(6/18) c.StaffUpdates: 5.ConsentAgenda: A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillsforMay23rd B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-39approvingcontributionsfrom TomPerraultfortheGeneralFundandReferaFriendProgramfortheFire Department D.ConsiderationofestablishingchangefundforMCCforoperationofconcessions cart E.Considerationofapprovingthe2010StormWaterPollutionPreventionProgram (SWPPP)AnnualReport F.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#529amendingtheMonticelloZoning Ordinance,Chapter2.4-SpecificReviewProcedures&Requirements,Chapter 5.3(D)-AccessoryUseStandards,andChapter5.4–TemporaryUses G.ConsiderationofreimbursingplanningreviewapplicationanddepositforNAPA Auto SPECIALMEETING 5:30p.m.–Park&TrailPlanReview(JointParks/PC/CC/MCCAdvisory) H.ConsiderationofarequestforConditionalUsePermitforVeterinaryFacilities (Neighborhood)andanamendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopmentforMonticello BusinessCenter5th Addition/QuadDevelopment.Applicant:Quad Development,LLC I.ConsiderationofapprovingasubsidyfortheBuildingPlanCheckFeefor AroplaxinaccordancewiththeBusinessExpansionIncentivePilotprogram J.ConsiderationofapprovinganagreementbetweenMattMaierandtheCityof MonticellotoharvesthayandmaintainboulevardsonspecifiedCityproperties 6.Considerationofitemsremovedfromtheconsentagendafordiscussion 7.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-40orderingImprovementsandauthorizing RequestforProposalforbidsforthe2011StreetLightingImprovementsfor7th Street East,CityProjectNo.11C002 8.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-41authorizingpreparationofaFeasibility ReportforWalnutStreetBoulevardImprovements,CityProjectNo.11C003 9.ConsiderationofapprovingaMapleStreetright-of-wayriverbankrestorationproject 10.Addeditems 11.Adjournment CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 1 5A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforMay23rd (TK) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheattachedbillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedsincethelastCouncilmeeting. SubjecttoMNStatutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecks forpayment.ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunless directedotherwise. IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillregisters,thesecanbeapprovedwith theconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfromconsentanddiscussed priortomakingamotionforapproval. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethebillregistersforatotalamountof$1,100,879.30. 2.MotiontoapprovethebillregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Billregisters CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 1 5B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers. A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget) A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as needed,untilreplaced. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached list. 2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures. C.RECOMMENDATION: BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas listed. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Listofnew/terminatedemployees Name Title Department Hire Date Class Scott Iano Seasonal Parks Worker Parks 5/16 Seasonal Lisa Bechtold Customer Care Consultant FNM 5/16 PT Name Reason Department Last Day Class Noah Emanuel Voluntary MCC 5/4 PT NEW EMPLOYEES TERMINATING EMPLOYEES 5B Council_employee list 2011.xlsx: 5/17/2011 CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 1 5C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-39toacceptcontributionsfromTom PerraultfortheGeneralFundandRMGReferaFriendprogramfortheFire Department (CS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TomPerraultiscontributing$250forMaytogointotheGeneralFund.Wereceiveda donationof$150fromtheRMGReferaFriendProgramthatisdesignatedforFire Departmentsuppliesandequipment.Thisprogramallowshomebuyerstocontribute moneytothecommunityinwhichtheirnewhomeislocated. Asrequiredbystatestatute,iftheCityacceptsthedonationoffunds,theCityCouncil needstoadoptaresolutionspecifyingtheamountofthedonationanditsuse. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffaccountsforandreconcilesdonationscontributed throughtheCity. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Approvethecontributionsandauthorizeuseoffundsasspecified. 2.Donotapprovethecontributionsandreturnthefundstothedonors. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommendationistoadopttheresolutionacceptingthecontributions. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: ResolutionNo.2011-39 CityofMonticello RESOLUTIONNO.2011-39 APPROVINGCONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS,theCityofMonticelloisgenerallyauthorizedtoaccept contributionsofrealandpersonalpropertypursuanttoMinnesotaStatutesSections 465.03and465.04forthebenefitofitscitizensandisspecificallyauthorizedtomaintain suchpropertyforthebenefitofitscitizensinaccordancewiththetermsprescribedbythe donor.SaidgiftsmaybelimitedunderprovisionsofMNStatutesSection471.895. WHEREAS,thefollowingpersonsandorentitieshaveofferedtocontribute contributionsorgiftstotheCityaslisted: DONOR/ENTITYDESCRIPTIONVALUE TomPerraultCash$250 RMGReferaFriendCash$150 WHEREAS,allsaidcontributionsareintendedtoaidtheCityinestablishing facilities,operationsorprogramswithinthecity’sjurisdictioneitheraloneorin cooperationwithothers,asallowedbylaw;and WHEREAS,theCityCouncilherebyfindsthatitisappropriatetoacceptthe contributionsoffered. NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVED bytheCityCouncilofMonticelloas follows: 1.ThecontributionsdescribedaboveareherebyacceptedbytheCityof Monticello. 2.Thecontributionsdescribedabovewillbeusedasdesignatedbythe donor.Thismayentailreimbursingorallocatingthemoneytoanother entitythatwillutilizethefundsforthefollowingstatedpurpose: DONOR/ENTITYRECIPIENTPURPOSE TomPerraultCityofMonticelloGeneralfund(May) RMGReferaFriendMonticelloFireDepartmentSuppliesorequipment AdoptedbytheCityCouncilofMonticellothis23rddayofMay,2011. CITYOFMONTICELLO ______________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:5/23/11 5D.ConsiderationofestablishingchangefundforMCCforoperationofaconcessions trailer (KB) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheCommunityCenterisplanningtooperateaconcessiontrailerprimarilyatthe FreewayFieldareaforthe2011seasonstartinginJune.Itisbeingrequestedthata changefundfortheconcessionsoperationbeestablished.Itisanauditrequirementfor theCityCounciltoapproveallchangefunds.Noamountisshowninthisdocumentbut Councilmemberswillreceiveaseparatelistingshowingtheamount. FUNDDEPARTMENTUSE ChangeFundMCCCashdrawerusedwhenMCCoperates concessiontrailer B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapprovetheestablishmentofachangefundforMCCfortheoperation ofaportableconcessiontrailer. 2.Motiontodenyestablishingachangefundforthispurpose. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1approvingtheestablishmentofachangefundfora concessiontrailer.Thisapprovalwouldbeincompliancewithauditrequirements. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: None CityCouncilAgenda:5/23/11 1 5E.Considerationofapprovingthe2010StormWaterPollutionPreventionProgram (SWPPP)AnnualReport (BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: In2005,theCityofMonticellowasdesignatedasaregulatedsmallmunicipalseparate stormsewersystem(MS4)underMinnesotaRules,Chapter7090.ThisrequiredtheCity toobtainaNationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystem/StateDisposalSystem (NPDES/SDS)stormwaterpermit,andtodevelopandimplementaStormWater PollutionPreventionProgram(SWPPP)toreducethedischargeofpollutants,including sediments,fromourstormsewersystemtothemaximumextentpracticable. OnFebruary15,2007ourdraftSWPPPwassubmittedtotheMinnesotaPollution ControlAgency(MPCA)forreviewandapproval.OnMarch24,2008theMPCA approvedourdraftSWPPPandweweregrantedgeneralpermitcoverage. OurSWPPPaddresses6minimumcontrolmeasures(MCM’s)asfollows: 1.PublicEducationandOutreach, 2.PublicParticipationandInvolvement, 3.IllicitDischargeDetectionandElimination, 4.ConstructionSiteStormwaterRunoffControl, 5.Post-ConstructionStormwaterManagementMeasures,and 6.PollutionPrevention/GoodHousekeepingMeasures. Atotalof39bestmanagementpractices(BMP’s)andmeasurablegoalsassociatedwith the6MCM’sareidentifiedintheSWPPPforimplementation.Councilshouldbeaware thattheseBMP’sresultinhundredsofhoursofCitystafftimebeingspenteveryyearto administerandcompletethetasksidentifiedinourSWPPP.Thesetasksincludesuch itemsaspreparinganddistributingpublicinformationpamphletsandnewsarticles, holdingpublicmeetings,andinventoryingandmappingourentirestormsewersystem includingponds,pipes,structures,outfalls,waterbodies,etc. EachyearwearerequiredtosubmitanannualreporttotheMPCAbyJune30th.The reportsummarizesourSWPPPimplementationeffortsoverthepreviouscalendaryear. Ourdraft2010annualreportisattachedassupportingdocumentationforCouncilto reviewandapprovepriortosubmittingtotheMPCA. Sincelastyear’s(2009)annualreportwassubmitted,theCityCounciladoptedanIllicit DischargeDetectionandElimination(IDDE)ordinanceasrequiredbyourSWPPP.This isnotedinsectionV.G.3Dofthedraft2010annualreport.Otherthanthatthereis nothingnewornoteworthytoreport.However,Councilshouldbeawarethatwearenot keepingupwithourstormwaterpondmaintenanceeffortsasrequiredinourSWPPP underBMP#’s6b-3and6b-5.SincethiscouldresultintheMPCAdenyingfuture NPDESpermitstotheCityforourgeneralpermitand/orpermitsforspecific improvementprojects,staffrecommendsthatweincreaseourmaintenanceefforts immediately.Assuch,staffintendstoincreasethebudgetitemdedicatedforsuch CityCouncilAgenda:5/23/11 2 maintenanceworkin2012.Staffwillbepreparedtodiscussthisinmoredetailduring thissummer’sbudgetworkshops. ShouldCouncilwishtodirectanychangestothe2010annualSWPPPreport,staffwill maketherequestedchangesintimetosubmitthereporttotheMPCVApriortoJune30th. A.1BudgetImpact:Completingthe2010AnnualReporthadnodirectimpacttothe budget. A.2StaffWorkload:Staffspentapproximately50hourspreparingthe2010Annual Report,includingallassociateddocumentation. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethe2010SWPPPAnnualReportandauthorizeimmediate submittaltotheMPCA. 2.Motiontodenyapprovalandsubmittalofthe2010SWPPPAnnualReportto theMPCApendingrevisionsbasedonCouncilinput. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Draft2010SWPPPAnnualReport www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-06 • 1/26/11 Page 1 of 5 MS4 Annual Report for 2010 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) Reporting period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Due June 30, 2011 Doc Type: Permitting Annual Report Instructions: By completing this mandatory MS4 Annual Report form, you are providing the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with a summary of your status of compliance with permit conditions, including an assessment of the appropriateness of your identified best management practices (BMPs) and progress towards achieving your identified measurable goals for each of the minimum control measures as required by the MS4 Permit. If a permittee determines that program status or compliance with the permit can not be adequately reflected within the structure of this form additional explanation and/or information may be referenced in an attachment. This form has significant limitations and provides only a snap shot of MS4 compliance with the conditions in the Permit. After reviewing the information, MPCA staff may need to contact the permittee to clarify or seek additional information. The MPCA enforcement policy is to provide the opportunity to respond to any alleged violations before any enforcement action is taken. Submittal: This MS4 Annual Report must be submitted electronically to the MPCA using the submit button at the end of the form, from the person that is duly authorized to certify this form. All questions with an asterisk (*) are required fields (these fields also have a red border), and must be completed before the form will send. A confirmation e-mail will be sent in response to electronic submissions. To obtain an electronic copy of the 2010 MS4 Annual Report form, please visit the MPCA website at: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/stormwater/stormwater-ms4.html. If you have further questions, please contact one of these MPCA staff members (toll-free 800-657-3864): • Joyce Cieluch 218-846-7387 • Scott Fox 651-757-2368 • Amy Garcia 651-757-2377 General Contact Information (*Required fields) *Name of MS4: *Contact name: *Mailing address: *City: *State: *Zip code: *Phone (including area code): *E-mail: Check here if this contact information is different than the contact indicated on the mailing label. Minimum Control Measure 1: Public Education and Outreach [V.G.1] (*Required fields) A. The permit requires each Permittee to implement a public education program to distribute educational materials to the community or conduct equivalent outreach activities about the impacts of stormwater discharges on water bodies and steps that the public can take to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff. [Part V.G.1.a] Note: Please indicate which of the following distribution methods you used during the 2010 calendar year. Indicate the number distributed in the spaces provided (enter “0” if the method was not used or “NA” if the data does not exist): Media type Number of media Number of times published Circulation/ Audience Example: Brochures: 3 different brochures published 5 times about 10,000 Brochures: Newsletter: Posters: Newspaper articles: Utility bill inserts: Radio ads: Television ads: Cable Access Channel: Other: Other: Other: www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-06 • 1/26/11 Page 2 of 5 B. *Do you use a website as a tool to distribute stormwater educational materials? Yes No What is the URL: C. If you answered yes in question B. above, do you track hits to the site? Yes No How many hits to the stormwater page during 2010: D. *Did you hold stormwater related events, presentations to schools or other such activities? Yes No If yes, please describe: E. *Have specific messages been developed and distributed during the 2010 calendar year for Minimum Control Measure (MCM): MCM 1: Yes No MCM 4: Yes No MCM 2: Yes No MCM 5: Yes No MCM 3: Yes No MCM 6: Yes No F. *Have you developed partnerships with other MS4s, watershed districts, local or state governments, educational institutions, etc., to assist you in fulfilling the requirements for MCM 1? Yes No G. List those entities with which you have partnered during the 2010 calendar year to meet the requirements of this MCM and describe the nature of the agreement(s). Attach a separate sheet if necessary: H. *Have you developed methods to assess the effectiveness of your public education/outreach program? Yes No If yes, please describe: Minimum Control Measure 2: Public Participation/Involvement [V.G.2] (*Required fields) A. *Did you hold a public meeting to present accomplishments for calendar year 2010 and to discuss your Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP)? [Part V.G.1.e] Yes No If no, explain: B. What was the date of the public meeting: C. How many citizens attended specifically for stormwater (excluding board/council members and staff/hired consultants)? D. Was the public meeting a stand-alone meeting for stormwater or was it combined with some other function (City Council meeting, other public event, etc.)? Stand-alone Combined E. *Each permittee must solicit and consider input from the public prior to submittal of the annual report. Did you receive written and/or oral input on your SWPPP? [Part V.G.2.b.1-3] Yes No F. *Have you revised your SWPPP in response to written or oral comments received from the public since the last annual reporting cycle? [Part V.G.2.c] Yes No If yes, describe. Attach a separate sheet if necessary: Minimum Control Measure 3: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination [V.G.3] (*Required fields) The permit requires permittees to develop, implement, and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges as defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(2). You must also select and implement a program of appropriate BMPs and measurable goals for this minimum control measure. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-06 • 1/26/11 Page 3 of 5 A. *Did you update your storm sewer system map in 2010? Yes No If yes, please explain which components (ponds, pipes, outfalls, waterbodies, etc.) were updated/added: Note: The storm sewer system map was to be completed by June 30, 2008. [Part V.G.3.a] B. *Have you modified the format in which the map is available? Yes No C. If yes, indicate the new format: Hardcopy only GIS system CAD Other system: D. *Have you established an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to prohibit illicit discharges and/or non-stormwater discharges from entering the MS4? Note: The Permit requires the ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to be established by June 30, 2010 [Part V.G.3.b] If yes, indicate whether you’ve established an: Ordinance or Regulatory mechanism Yes No E. If you answered yes in question D. above, provide the date the ordinance or other regulatory mechanism was adopted: F. If you answered yes in question D. above, a complete copy of your illicit discharge prohibition ordinance or other regulatory mechanism addressing the requirements of Part V.G.3.b. of the Permit must be submitted with this MS4 Annual Report. Please provide the URL/reference where your illicit discharge ordinance or other regulatory mechanism may be found. Include specific code numbers if available: The ordinance may alternately be submitted as a separate electronic file attached to the e-mail submittal of this annual report. Are you submitting an electronic copy? Yes No Minimum Control Measure 4: Construction Site Stormwater Runoff [V.G.4] (*Required fields) The permit requires that each permittee develop, implement, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in any stormwater runoff to your small MS4 from construction activities within your jurisdiction that result in a land disturbance of equal to or greater than one acre, including the disturbance of less than one acre of total land area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb one or more acres. [Part V.G.4.] A. The permit requires an erosion and sediment control ordinance or regulatory mechanism that must include sanctions to ensure compliance and contains enforcement mechanisms [Part V.G.4.a]. Indicate which of the following enforcement mechanisms are contained in your ordinance or regulatory mechanism and the number of actions taken for each mechanism used during the reporting period (enter “0” if the method was not used or “NA” if the data does not exist). Check all that apply. Enforcement mechanism Number of actions Verbal warnings # Notice of violation # Administrative orders # Stop-work orders # Fines # Forfeit of security of bond money # Withholding of certificate of occupancy # Criminal actions # Civil penalties # Other: # B. *Have you developed written procedures for site inspections? Yes No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-06 • 1/26/11 Page 4 of 5 C. *Have you developed written procedures for site enforcement? Yes No D. *Identify the number of active construction sites greater than an acre in your jurisdiction during the 2010 calendar year: E. *On average, how frequently are construction sites inspected (e.g., weekly, monthly, etc.)? F. *How many inspectors, at any time, did you have available to verify erosion and sediment control compliance at construction sites during the 2010 calendar year: Minimum Control Measure 5: Post-construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment [V.G.5] (*Required fields) The permit requires each permittee to develop, implement, and enforce a program to address stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment projects within your jurisdiction that disturb an area greater than or equal to one acre, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale that discharge into your small MS4. Your program must ensure that controls are in place that would prevent or reduce water quality impacts. You must also select and implement a program of appropriate BMPs and measurable goals for this minimum control measure. Note: The MS4 permit requirements associated with this minimum control measure were required to be fully developed and implemented by June 30, 2008. A. *Have you established design standards for stormwater treatment BMPs installed as a result of post-construction requirements? Yes No B. *Have you developed procedures for site plan review which incorporate consideration of water quality impacts? Yes No C. *How many projects have you reviewed during the 2010 calendar year to ensure adequate long- term operation and maintenance of permanent stormwater treatment BMPs installed as a result of post-construction requirements? [Part V.G.5.b.and Part V.G.5.c]. D. *Do plan reviewers use a checklist when reviewing plans? Yes No E. *How are you funding the long-term operation and maintenance of your stormwater management system? (Check all that apply) Grants Stormwater utility fee Taxes Other: Minimum Control Measure 6: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations [V.G.6] (*Required fields) The permit requires each MS4 to develop and implement an operation and maintenance program that includes a training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations. Your program must include employee training to prevent and reduce stormwater pollution from activities, such as park and open space maintenance, fleet and building maintenance, new construction and land disturbances, and stormwater system maintenance. A. *Indicate the total number of structural pollution control devices (for example-grit chambers, sumps, floatable skimmers, etc.) within your MS4, the total number that were inspected in 2010, and calculate the percent inspected. Enter “0” if your MS4 does not contain structural pollution control devices or none were inspected in 2010. Enter “NA” if the data does not exist: *Total number *Number inspected *Percentage *Structural pollution control devices: B. *Did you repair, replace, or maintain any structural pollution control devices? Yes No C. *For each BMP below, indicate the total number within your MS4, how many of each BMP type were inspected and the percent inspected in 2010. Enter “0” if your MS4 does not contain BMPs or none were inspected in 2010. Enter “NA” if the data does not exist: Structure/Facility type *Total number *Number inspected *Percentage *Outfalls to receiving waters: *Sediment basins/ponds: *Total www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-06 • 1/26/11 Page 5 of 5 D. Of the BMPs inspected in C. above, did you include any privately owned BMPs in that number? Yes No E. If yes in D. above, how many? Section 7: Impaired Waters Review (*Required fields) The permit requires any MS4 that discharges to a Water of the State, which appears on the current U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved list of impaired waters under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, review whether changes to the SWPPP may be warranted to reduce the impact of your discharge [Part IV.D]. A. *Does your MS4 discharge to any waters listed as impaired on the state 303 (d) list? Yes No B. *Have you modified your SWPPP in response to an approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)? Yes No If yes, indicate for which TMDL: Section 8: Additional SWPPP Issues (*Required fields) A. *Did you make a change to any BMPs or measurable goals in your SWPPP since your last report? [Part V.H.] Yes No B. If yes, briefly list the BMPs or any measurable goals using their unique SWPPP identification numbers that were modified in your SWPPP, and why they were modified: (Attach a separate sheet if necessary) C. *Did you rely on any other entities (MS4s, consultants, or contractors) to implement any portion of your SWPPP? Yes No If yes, please identify them and list activities they assisted with: Owner or Operator Certification (*Required fields) The person with overall administrative responsibility for SWPPP implementation and Permit compliance must certify this MS4 Annual Report. This person must be duly authorized and should be either a principal executive (i.e., Director of Public Works, City Administrator) or ranking elected official (i.e., Mayor, Township Supervisor). *Yes - I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete (Minn. R. 7001.0070). I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment (Minn. R. 7001.0540). *Name of certifying official: *Title: *Date: (mm/dd/yyyy) CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 1 5F.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#529amendingtheMonticelloZoningOrdinance, Chapter2.4-SpecificReviewProcedures&Requirements,Chapter5.3(D)-Accessory UseStandards,andChapter5.4–TemporaryUses (AS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: ThePlanningCommissionreviewedtheproposedamendmentsatitsregularMay meetingandrecommendedapprovaloftheordinanceamendmentsaspresented. Althoughtherewasnopubliccommentontheproposedamendments, CommissionerFyledidrequestthatstaffprovideanupdateonthenumberand locationoftemporaryhoopstructuresinresidentialareas.Hisconcernwasnot relatedtotheconstructionofnewstructures,whichhefeltwasaddressedinthe codelanguage,butratherhowtodealwithstructuresalreadyinplace.Staff indicatedthatinformationwouldbeprovidedatanupcomingmeeting,atwhich timethePlanningCommissioncouldmakerecommendationsspecifictoexisting structureallowances. TheamendedMonticelloZoningCodeisinits6-monthcodetrackingperiod,whichis intendedtoidentifyminorcodelanguageadjustments.Withadoptionofthenewcode,it wasnotedthatsuchamendmentsmayariseasaresultofthenewcode’sdailyuseand application. StaffisrequestingthatPlanningCommissionconsideramendmentstovarious componentsofthecodeasdescribedbelow.Theamendmentspresentedbystaffbelow clarifyexistingcomponentsofthecode,orarecomponentsofthepreviouscodethatneed tobeincorporatedintothenewcode.Theseamendmentsare: 1.AmendmenttotheMonticelloZoningOrdinance,Chapter2.4(B)(2)forthe initiationofZoningOrdinanceTextandMapAmendments AmendmentallowstheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmenttoinitiateZoning OrdinanceTextandMapAmendments.A2005ordinanceamendmenthadallowed this;itwasnottransferredtonewcode.Staffneedstheflexibility(especiallygiven therecentlyadoptedcomprehensivezoningordinanceamendment)tocallfor hearingsforexpediency. Textofamendment: 2.4(B)(2):(c)RecommendationoftheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment;or Thenre-letter (d)ActionoftheCityCouncil. 2.AmendmenttotheMonticelloZoningOrdinance,Chapter5.3(D)asrelatedto thestandardsforAccessoryStructuresintheM-HDistrict. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 2 AmendmentreplacesreferencestoformerR-4districtwith“M-H”inalllocations. Textofamendment: 5.3(D)(2)(b):IntheR-4 M-Hdistrict,oneminoraccessorybuildingforstorage ofequipmentandrefuseispermittedforeachmanufacturedhomeprovidedthe accessorybuildingcanmeetallrequiredsetbacks,andisdesignedofweather resistancetmaterialthatwillenhancethegeneralappearanceofthelot. 5.3(D)(3)(a):InallresidentialdistrictsexceptR-4 M-H,thefollowingshall apply: 5.3(D)(3)(b):IntheR-4 M-Hdistrict,thefollowingshallapply: 3.AmendmenttotheMonticelloZoningOrdinance,Chapter5.4asrelatedtothe GeneralandSpecificStandardsforTemporaryUses. Thenewcodedoesnothaveaspecificprovisionallowingfortheoutdoorsalesand displayofgoodsnotrelatedtotheprincipaluse(outsideofagricultural/horticultural sales).Theneedforthisseasonalpermitrelatestothosebusinessesseekingtosell fireworks,etc.ItwasinitiallythoughtthattheCity’sTransientMerchantcodecould covertheseuses,buttheTransientMerchantprovisioncoversonlythelicensingand notlanduseimpactsrelatedtothesetypesofuses. Theproposedamendmentallowsforsuchseasonalusesandalsochangesprovisions for“Tents,Canopies,TartGaragesandHoopBuildings”fortheseuses. Thereisalsoaneedforanamendmenttoaccommodateconstructiondumpsters outsideofabuildingpermit.Thisisintendedforthosepropertyownersmaking interiorrenovationswhichdonotrequirebuildingpermits. Listedbelowarethesuggestedamendments: Table5-8:TemporaryStructure AmendtextforConstructionDumpster(onprivateproperty). o AllowableDuration:30dayswithoutbuildingpermit. o PermitRequired:No o AdditionalRequirements:5.4(E)(1)(b). Table5-8:TemporarySale AmendtoaddadditionallineitemforSeasonalSales. o AllowableDuration:60daysperpermit/120daysmaximumterm o PermitRequired:Yes o AdditionalRequirements:5.4(E)(7)and5.4(E)(12) CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 3 Section5.4(E)(1)(b):ConstructionDumpster Additionaltext: (vi)Besecuredwithacovertopreventlitteranddebrisfromescapingthe dumpster. Section5.4(E)(7)(d):Tents,Canopies,TarpGaragesandHoopBuildings Amendedtext: o Notbeerectedformorethanatotalof30daysinanycalendaryear;with theexceptionofthoseuseswithvalidpermitsissuedunder5.4(E)(8-12). Section5.4(E)(12)SeasonalSales Addanewsubsectionafter“SpecialEvents’.Textofamendment: o Seasonalsalesshall: o Beauthorizedinwritingbythepropertyownerifconductedon propertynotownedbytheseasonalsaleoperator; o Notbelocatedwithinanyright-of-way; o Notreduceavailableparkingareasbelowthatwhichisrequired bycode; o Provideadequateingress,egressandoff-streetparkingareas;and o BesubjecttothesignstandardsinSections4. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: ThePlanningCommissionrecommendsalternative1below. 1.MotiontoapproveOrdinance#529,amendmentstoMonticelloZoningOrdinance, Chapter2.4,Chapter5.3andChapter5.4,basedonafindingthattheproposed amendmentsareconsistentwiththeintentofthePurposeStatementsofMonticello ZoningOrdinanceChapter2andSections5.3and5.4. 2.MotiontodenyOrdinance#529,amendmentstoMonticelloZoningOrdinance, Chapter2.4,Chapter5.3andChapter5.4,basedonafindingthattheproposed amendmentsareconsistentwiththeintentofthePurposeStatementsofMonticello ZoningOrdinanceChapter2andSections5.3and5.4. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1above.Staffhasfoundthattheproposedamendments areconsistentwiththeintentofthePurposeStatementsofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Chapter2andSections5.3and5.4. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 4 D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Ordinance#529 A-Excerpt,Chapter2.4 B-Excerpt,Chapter5.3(D) C-Excerpt,Chapter5.4 ORDINANCENO.529 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10–MONTICELLOZONING ORDINANCEOFTHEMONTICELLOCITYCODE SECTION2.4–ZONINGORDINANCETEXTANDMAPAMENDMENTS SECTION5.3–STANDARDSFORACCESSORYUSESAND STRUCTURES SECTION5.4–TEMPORARYUSESANDSTRUCTURES THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLOHEREBYORDAINS: Section1.Section2.4(B)ofTitle10-ZoningOrdinanceisherebyamendedtoadd(2) (c)andrenumberaccordingly: 2.4(B)ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMapAmendments (2)InitiationofProceedings (c)RecommendationoftheCommunityDevelopment Department;or (cd)ActionoftheCityCouncil. Section2.Section5.3(D)ofTitle10–ZoningOrdinanceisherebyamendedasfollows: 5.3(D)AdditionalSpecificStandardsforCertainAccessoryUses (2)AccessoryBuilding–Minor (b)Inthe R-4 M-Hdistrict,oneminoraccessorybuildingforstorage ofequipmentandrefuseispermittedforeachmanufacturedhome providedtheaccessorybuildingcanmeetallrequiredsetbacks,and isdesignedofweather resistancet materialthatwillenhancethe generalappearanceofthelot. (3)AccessoryBuilding–Major (a)Inallresidentialdistrictsexcept R-4 M-H,thefollowingshall apply: (b)Inthe R-4 M-Hdistrict,thefollowingshallapply: ORDINANCENO.529 Section3.Section5.4(D)ofTitle10–ZoningOrdinanceisherebyamendedasfollows: 5.4(D)TableofAllowedTemporaryUsesandStructures Table5-8:TemporaryUses&Structures–TemporaryStructure Amendtextfor:ConstructionDumpster(onprivateproperty) AllowableDuration:30dayswithoutbuildingpermit. PermitRequired:No. AdditionalRequirements:5.4(E)(1)(b). Table5-8:TemporaryUses&Structures–TemporarySale Amendtexttoaddlineitemfor:SeasonalSales AllowableDuration:60daysperpermit/120dayspercalendaryear maximumterm. PermitRequired:Yes. AdditionalRequirements:5.4(E)(7)and5.4(E)(12) Section4.Section5.4(E)ofTitle10–ZoningOrdinanceisherebyamendedasfollows: 5.4(E)SpecificStandardsforTemporaryUses (1)ConstructionDumpster Under(b),addthisitemandtext: (vi)Besecuredwithacovertopreventlitteranddebrisfrom escapingthedumpster. (7)Tents,Canopies,TarpGarages,andHoopBuildings (d)Nottobeerectedformorethanatotalof30daysinany calendaryear;withtheexceptionofthoseuseswithvalid permitsissuedunder5.4(E)(8-12). AddthisnewsubsectiontoSection5.4(E): (12)SeasonalSales Seasonalsalesshall: (a)Beauthorizedinwritingbythepropertyownerifconductedon propertynotownedbytheseasonalsaleoperator; (b)Notbelocatedwithinanyright-of-way; (c)Notreduceavailableparkingareasbelowthatwhichisrequired bycode; (d)Provideadequateingress,egressandoff-streetparkingareas;and (e)BesubjecttothesignstandardsinSection4. ORDINANCENO.529 Section5.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassage andpublication.RevisionswillbemadeonlineafteradoptionbyCouncil. CopiesofthecompleteZoningOrdinanceareavailableonlineandat MonticelloCityHall. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis23rd dayofMay,2011. CITYOFMONTICELLO ____________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (B) Zoning Ordinance Text and Zoning Map Amendments City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 21 (b) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the guiding principles of the Comprehensive Plan; (c) The extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need; (d) Whether the proposed amendment will protect the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the public; (e) The impacts on the natural and built environments, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, water quality, vegetation, drainage, streets, and other engineering design or environmental factors; (f) Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject property; whether the proposed design and land uses are appropriate for the land; and whether the proposed amendment will maintain or improve compatibility among uses and ensure efficient development within the City; (g) Whether the proposed amendment will result in a logical, orderly and predictable development pattern; and (h) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purpose of this ordinance. (B) Zoning Ordinance Text and Zoning Map Amendments (1) Purpose and Scope This section sets out the procedures to be followed in reviewing and considering a text change to this ordinance or an amendment to the zoning map with the exception of a map amendment to a planned unit development, which shall be subject to the procedures in Section 2.4(P), Planned Unit Development. (2) Initiation of Proceedings Proceedings for the amendment of the text of this ordinance or the zoning map shall be initiated by one of the following: (a) An owner of property or an authorized representative of an owner pursuant to Section 2.3(B), Authority to File Applications; (b) Recommendation of the Planning Commission; or CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (B) Zoning Ordinance Text and Zoning Map Amendments Page 22 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (c) Action of the City Council. (3) Application (a) All applications to amend the text of this ordinance or the zoning map shall be in accordance with Section 2.3, Common Review Procedures & Requirements. (b) In addition to the common review requirements, applications for changes to the text of this ordinance or the Zoning Map shall also include the following: (i) The name of the applicant; (ii) A narrative explaining the requested modification and the reasons why the changes are supported by the Comprehensive Plan; (iii) The legal description of all real property proposed for change, if applicable; (iv) The existing and proposed land use and zoning designations for all properties proposed for change, if applicable; (v) A map of the properties to be modified to a different zoning designation, showing the addresses and zoning designations for the subject properties and the adjacent properties, if applicable; (vi) The location of the proposed text to be added, amended, or deleted in this ordinance, if applicable. (4) Review (a) Planning Commission Before any amendment is adopted, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing after proper notice has been issued in accordance with Section 2.3(I). Following the hearing, the Planning Commission shall adopt findings and recommendations on the proposed amendment as soon as practical. The Community Development Department may forward an application to the City Council without a recommendation from the Planning Commission only if it is deemed necessary to ensure compliance with state mandated deadlines for application review. Section 2.3: Common Review Requirements Section 2.3(I): Public Notification CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (C) Variances City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 23 (b) City Council The City Council may hold a public hearing on the amendment if deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. After consideration of the Planning Commission recommendation and/or hearing, if applicable, the City Council may adopt the amendment or any part thereof in such form as it deems advisable. The amendment requires the approval of four-fifths of all the members of the City Council. (5) Approval Criteria Recommendations and decisions on zoning amendments shall be based on consideration of the following criteria: (a) Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error in the original text or map; or (b) Whether the proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing condition, trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area. (c) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the comprehensive plan. (C) Variances (1) Purpose and Scope The Variance process is intended to provide limited relief from the strict requirements of this ordinance in those cases where strict application of a particular requirement will create an unnecessary hardship due to circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. It is not intended that Variances be granted to allow a use not permitted by the underlying zoning district, nor to merely remove inconveniences or financial burdens that the requirements of this ordinance may impose on property owners in general. Variances are intended to address extraordinary, exceptional, or unique situations that were not caused by the applicant’s act or omission. (2) Initiation of Proceedings Variances shall be initiated by an owner of property or an authorized representative of an owner pursuant to Section 2.3(B), Authority to File Applications. CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses Page 306 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (e) Accessory dwelling units shall be positioned in one of the following locations: (i) Within the principal structure (e.g. a lower level apartment); (ii) Attached to the principal building; (iii) Detached and behind the principal structure as a freestanding building or above a detached outbuilding. (f) Attached accessory dwelling units shall adhere to the following: (i) The accessory dwelling unit must be attached to the principal structure and have an operative interconnecting door with the principal structure. (ii) Access to the unit shall only be from the side or rear yard of the principal structure. (g) Detached accessory dwelling units shall adhere to the following: (i) The detached accessory dwelling unit shall be a minimum of six (6) feet from the principal structure. (ii) The accessory dwelling unit must be located in the same base zoning district as the principal structure. (h) The use of manufactured homes, travel trailers, campers, tractor trailers, or similar vehicles as an accessory dwelling unit shall be prohibited. (i) An accessory dwelling unit shall have a floor area of at least 300 square feet and shall not exceed 25 percent of the floor area in the principal structure. (j) At least one, but no more than two, off-street parking spaces shall be provided for an accessory dwelling unit (in addition to the required off-street parking serving the principal use). (k) Accessory dwelling units shall not be sold apart from the principal structure. (l) Accessory dwelling units shall not include home occupations. (2) Accessory Building – Minor (a) Minor accessory buildings do not require a building permit, but shall comply with all applicable zoning regulations. (b) In the R-4 district, one minor accessory building for storage of equipment and refuse is permitted for each manufactured home provided the accessory building can meet all required setbacks, and is designed of weather resistance material that will enhance the general appearance of the lot. CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 307 (3) Accessory Building – Major (a) In all residential districts except R-4, the following shall apply: (i) Size 1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: a. 1,200 square feet; or b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. 2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use permit when the following conditions are found to exist: a. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. b. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. c. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. d. The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. (ii) Private Garages 1. Private garages shall be used by the family or families residing upon the premises, except as follows: a. One-half of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if sufficient off-street parking in full compliance with this ordinance is provided elsewhere on the property. CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses Page 308 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance b. All of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if the available garage space does not exceed two spaces. 2. No business, service, or industry shall be carried on within a private garage; 3. Private garages shall not be used for the storage of more than one (1) commercial vehicle owned or operated by a resident per dwelling unit. (b) In the R-4 district, the following shall apply: (i) Accessory storage buildings in manufactured home parks, if not reviewed and approved as part of a PUD, shall be conditionally permitted subject to the following additional requirements: 1. The storage building and any accompanying outdoor storage area shall be for the sole use of the residents of the manufactured home park and shall not be used by non-residents. 2. Accompanying outdoor storage areas shall be fully screened from surrounding manufactured home units and adjacent properties. (c) In all business and industrial districts, commercial or business buildings and structures for a use accessory to the principal use is permitted provided that: (i) In all districts except I-2, such use shall not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor space of the principal use. (ii) In the I-2 district, such use shall not exceed forty (40) percent of the gross floor space of the principal use. (4) Adult Use/Accessory Activities provided that: (a) Activities classified as obscene as defined by Minnesota Statute 617.241 are not permitted and are prohibited. (b) An adult use which does not qualify as an accessory use shall be classified as an adult use/principal. (c) Adult use/accessory activities shall be prohibited from locating in any building which is also utilized for residential purposes. MN Statute 617.241 CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (A) Purpose City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 323 2. In all cases, large trash handling and recycling collection areas shall be at least six feet from a side or rear lot line, and shall not be located within front yards or corner side yards. (iv) Design Materials If a wall or detached accessory structure is used to screen or define a large trash handling and recycling collection area, the building materials used for the wall or accessory structure shall be compatible with the principal structure and be readily served through swinging doors. (v) Ground Surface Requirements Areas intended for large trash handling and recycling collection areas shall be surfaced with concrete that meets or exceeds minimum City standards. (vi) Drainage Eating establishments and other uses that produce significant amounts of liquid waste shall configure areas intended for large trash handling and recycling collection areas to drain to the sanitary sewer system through grease traps or similar devices as required by the Community Development Department. (31) Wind Energy Conversion System – Commercial All commercial WECS systems shall adhere to the requirements of Section 4.12 in this ordinance. (32) Wind Energy Conversion System – Non-commercial (a) Non-commercial WECS systems shall have a total height of less than 200 feet. (b) All non-commercial WECS systems shall adhere to the requirements of Section 4.12 in this ordinance. 5.4 Temporary Uses (A) Purpose This section allows for the establishment of certain temporary uses of limited duration and special events, provided that such uses comply with the standards in this subsection and are discontinued upon the expiration of a set time period. Temporary uses and special events shall not involve the construction or alteration of any permanent building or structure. Section 4.12: Wind Energy Conversion Systems CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (C) General Standards for Temporary Uses Page 324 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (B) Permit Required Temporary uses and structures that require a permit shall be reviewed in accordance with the process outlined in Section 2.4(L), Temporary Use Permits; and if a building permit is also necessary, in accordance with Section 2.4(I), Building Permits. (C) General Standards for Temporary Uses Temporary uses, structures, or events shall comply with the following: (1) Obtain the appropriate permits (as required); (2) Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; (3) Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; (4) Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; (5) Not include permanent alterations to the site; (6) Meet all the setbacks of the underlying base and overlay zoning districts, unless expressly stated otherwise in this ordinance. (7) Temporary signs permitted under the Code and associated with the use or structure shall be removed when the temporary activity ceases. (8) Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site; (9) Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and (10) Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands. Section 2.4(L): Temporary Use Permits Section 2.4(I): Building Permits CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (D) Table of Allowed Temporary Uses and Structures City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 325 (D) Table of Allowed Temporary Uses and Structures Table 5-8 summarizes allowed temporary uses and structures and any general or specific standards that apply. Temporary uses or structures not listed in the table are prohibited. TABLE 5-8: TEMPORARY USES & STRUCTURES Temporary Use or Structure Allowable Duration (per site) Permit(s) Required Additional Requirements Temporary Structure Construction Dumpster (on public ROW/property) Until issuance of certificate of occupancy or two days following expiration or finaling of a building permit Yes Sec 5.4(E)(1)(a) Construction Dumpster (on private property) No Sec 5.4(E)(1)(b) Construction Trailer Until issuance of certificate of occupancy Yes Sec 5.4(E)(2) Recreational Vehicle Use 1 month Yes Sec 5.4(E)(3) Real Estate Office / Model Sales Home Until 85% occupancy of the phase is reached Yes + Building Permit Sec 5.4(E)(4) Temporary Mobile Cell Site 30 days Yes + Building Permit Sec 5.4(E)(5) Temporary Sign 40 days per year Yes Sec 4.5(I) Temporary Storage in a Portable Container 30 days per year Yes Sec 5.4(E)(6) Tents, Canopies, Tarp Garages, and Hoop Buildings 30 days per year Yes Sec 5.4(E)(7) Temporary Sale Farmer’s Market Continuous; up to 5 months per year on a single site Yes Sec 5.4(E)(8) Garage/Yard Sale 4 days per event; 3 events total per calendar year No Sec 5.4(E)(9) Temporary Merchant See Title 3, Chapter 10 of City Code Wayside Stands 3 days per week No Sec 5.4(E)(10) Special Events Special Events 14 days per calendar year, per parcel unless expressly stated otherwise Yes Sec 5.4(E)(11) CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses Page 326 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses (1) Construction Dumpster (a) The placement of a temporary construction dumpster or other trash receptacle within a public right-of-way or other site owned by the City shall be subject to standards in the Monticello City code as may be applicable. (b) Temporary trash receptacles or dumpsters located outside public rights-of way are not required to obtain a temporary use permit, but shall comply with the following standards: (i) Be located to the side or the rear of the site, to the maximum extent practicable; (ii) Be located as far as possible from lots containing existing development; (iii) Not be located within a floodplain or otherwise obstruct drainage flow; (iv) Not be placed within five feet of a fire hydrant or within a required landscaping area; and (v) Be located outside of any required tree protection fencing and the dripline of existing trees. (2) Construction Trailer (a) Construction trailers may be permitted on a construction site provided that the trailer is: (i) Approved by the Community Development Department for location, safety, and compatibility with adjacent properties; (ii) Located on the same site or in the same development as the related construction; (iii) Not located within a required landscape area; and (iv) Associated with development for which a valid Building Permit has been or will be issued. (b) The applicant shall be required to restore the trailer site to its previous condition if the trailer is located off the construction site. (3) Recreational Vehicle Use (a) A recreational vehicle owned by a non-resident, guest, or visitor may be parked or occupied by the guest or visitor on private property containing a permanent dwelling unit for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days while visiting the resident of the property. CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 327 (b) The recreation vehicle shall have self-contained sanitary facilities or standard on-site facilities as required by the Community Development Department. (c) The parking location of a recreational vehicle shall adhere to the requirements of Section 4.8, Off-Street Parking. (4) Real Estate Sales Office/Model Sales Home One temporary real estate sales office or model sales home per builder or developer shall be permitted in a section or phase of a new residential or nonresidential development provided the office or model home: (a) Is aesthetically compatible with the character of surrounding development in terms of exterior color, predominant exterior building materials, and landscape; (b) Complies with the applicable standards in the approved development plan (if applicable); (c) Is operated by a developer or builder active in the same phase or section where the use is located; and (d) Is removed or the model home is converted into a permanent residential use once 85 percent occupancy in the section or phase of the development is reached. (5) Temporary Mobile Cell Site (a) A temporary mobile cell site may be erected after issuance of a building permit in the case of equipment failure or testing, or for an interim period (limited to 30 days) after a conditional use permit for a permanent cell site is approved. (b) Temporary mobile cell sites shall be removed within 72 hours following completion of testing, the installation of the permanent tower, or resolution of equipment failure. (6) Temporary Storage in a Portable Shipping Container Temporary storage in a portable shipping container shall be permitted to serve an existing use subject to the following standards. A portable shipping container shall not be located: (a) On a lot without prior approval from the Community Development Department. Section 4.8 Off Street Parking Regulations CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses Page 328 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (b) In a required front yard; (c) Within ten feet of any lot line or structure; (d) In a manner that impedes ingress, egress, or emergency access; and (e) On an individual parcel or site for more than 30 total days over any one-year period. (7) Tents, Canopies, Tarp Garages, and Hoop Buildings Tents, canopies, tarp garages, and hoop buildings or similar membrane structures shall: (a) Obtain a building permit from the Community Development Department; (b) Maintain a minimum clearance of 20 feet from all other structures and tents; (c) Not exceed more than two on a single parcel (the Community Development Department may approve more than two as a part of a special event on a single parcel of 20 or more acres in size); (d) Not be erected for more than a total of 30 days in any calendar year; (e) Be limited to a maximum of three occurrences per parcel per year; (f) Not be placed within required landscape areas; (g) Not obstruct emergency vehicle access to adjacent lots or disrupt pedestrian circulation; and (h) The lot or site shall be restored to its original condition within two days of removal of the tent, canopy, tarp garage, or hoop building. (8) Farmer’s Market Farmer’s markets shall: (a) Be limited to the retail sale of agriculture, horticulture, or floricultural products; (b) Provide adequate ingress, egress, and off-street parking areas; (c) Not reduce minimum parking areas below the minimum required for the property under the City Code; CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 329 (d) Not be located with any right-of-way; (e) Renew all applicable temporary use permits annually. (f) Be subject to the sign standards in Section 4.5, Signs. (9) Garage/Yard Sales (a) Garage or yard sales shall: (i) Be limited to a maximum of three per dwelling per year. (ii) Not exceed a maximum duration of four consecutive days per sale; (iii) Occur only between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M.; (iv) Not place items for sale, signs or other advertising within the public right- of-way, or impede the passage of traffic on streets in the area of the sale; (v) Conduct vehicle parking in accordance with the standards in this ordinance and any other applicable City requirements; (vi) Not negatively affect neighboring properties in terms of noise, trash, parking, or impede the flow of traffic on nearby streets; (vii) Not permit loud or boisterous conduct on the premises; and (viii) Not allow unsold items or other sale-related materials to remain in public view following conclusion of the sale. (ix) Remove all sale related signage immediately upon conclusion of the sale. (b) The owner and/or tenant of the premises on which a sale is conducted, shall be responsible for the maintenance of good order and decorum on the premises during the hours of the sale. (10) Wayside Stands A wayside stand shall: (a) Be limited to the retail sale of agriculture, horticulture, or floricultural products; (b) Not exceed 750 square feet in area; (c) Not be located with any right-of-way; CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses Page 330 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (d) Be authorized in writing by the landowner if conducted on property not owned by the operator of the wayside stand; (e) Not operate for more than three (3) days per site in any given week; (f) Not reduce available parking areas below that which is required by code; (g) Provide adequate ingress, egress, and off-street parking areas; and (h) Be subject to the sign standards in Section 4.5, Signs. (11) Special Events (a) Applicability The procedures and standards of this subsection shall apply to all special events that are planned for or which reasonably may be expected to attract more than 100 persons at any one time (including but not limited to cultural events, musical events, celebrations, festivals, fairs, and carnivals) held on private property within the City, unless expressly exempted. (b) Permit Required All special events subject to this subsection shall have a temporary use permit for a special event reviewed and approved or approved with conditions by the Community Development Department in accordance with Section 2.4(L), Temporary Use Permit, before conducting the special event. (c) Exemptions The following events or activities are exempt from the standards of this subsection (i.e., may occur without a Temporary Use Permit for a special event). Such activities are subject to all other applicable procedures and standards of this ordinance. (i) On Grounds of Private Residence Special events or activities occurring within, or on the grounds of, a private residence or on the common areas of a single-family attached, townhouse, two- to four-family, or multi-family residential development. (ii) Event Sponsored by City or State Any event sponsored in whole or in part by the City or state. Section 4.5: Signs Section 2.4(L): Temporary Use Permits CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 331 (iii) Event or Activity at Site Intended for Such Event or Activity Any organized activities conducted at sites or facilities typically intended and used for such activities. Examples of such exempt activities include, but are not limited to, sporting events such as golf, soccer, softball, and baseball tournaments conducted on courses or fields intended and used for such activities; fairs and carnivals at fairgrounds; wedding services conducted at reception halls, or similar facilities; funeral services conducted at funeral homes or cemeteries; religious services, wedding services, and funeral services conducted at religious institutions. (iv) Event Approved as Part of another Permit Temporary special events that are expressly approved as part of another permit shall not require separate review under this subsection. (d) Standards In addition to the general temporary use criteria to be reviewed with the permit application, the following standards shall also apply: (i) False or Material Misleading Information The application shall be certified by the applicant as not containing intentionally false or materially misleading information. (ii) Unreasonable Risk There is a finding that the special event would not create an unreasonable risk of significant: 1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear; 2. Injury to persons; 3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances; 4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel; 5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and 6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare. (iii) Location Cannot be Accommodated The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event. (iv) Time Permitted or Reserved for Other Activities The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety. CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses Page 332 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (e) Conditions In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the Community Development Department is authorized to impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require: (i) Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress. (ii) Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat. (iii) Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards. (iv) Provision of sanitary and medical facilities. (v) Provision of solid waste collection and disposal. (vi) Provision of security and safety measures. (vii) Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event. (viii) Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities. (ix) Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection. (x) Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition. (f) Duration of Permit A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Community Development Department. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 1 5G.ConsiderationofreimbursingplanningreviewapplicationanddepositforNAPAAuto (AS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: Councilisaskedtorefundtheplanningapplicationfeeandreviewdepositforlanduse applicationsrelatedtotheproposedNAPAAutoPartsStore.Councilisnotbeingasked torefundtheapplicationfeepaidforthevacationrequest. OnApril25th,theCityCouncilconsideredarequestforvacationofdrainageandutility easementforLot6,Block1oftheMonticelloTravelCenter2nd Addition.Therequest wasmadetoaccommodatetheproposeddevelopmentofanNAPAAutoparts/ accessoriesstore. TheCouncildeniedtherequestforvacation,basedonfindingsrelatedtoconsistency withtheoriginalPUDapproval. Thetimingofthevacationrequestrelativetotheapplicant’sdevelopmenttimelinewas suchthatNAPAhadalsosubmittedanapplicationforamendmenttoPUDandrezoning. Basedontheapplicationandstatutoryreviewdeadlines,thetworequestswerescheduled forhearingonMay3rd bythePlanningCommission. TheapplicationsforamendmenttoPUDandrezoningeachrequireafeeof$200tocover thecostofrequiredpublicnotice.Theapplicationsalsorequiredaplanningreview escrowof$2000,whichissubjecttoreconciliationagainstexpensesattheendofthe planningprocess. WithCouncil’sdenialofthevacationrequest,theapplicantcouldnolongerproceedwith theamendmenttoPUDandrezoning,asthevacationwasneededtoaccommodatethe submittedsiteplandesign.Assuch,theapplicantformallywithdrewbothapplications subsequenttothedenialofvacation. Unfortunately,timingofthelanduseapplicationsubmittalrequiredthatthehearing noticesbepublishedandmailed.Additionally,alimitedamountofreviewcostswere incurredforinitialplanningreview.Thoseexpensesarenotedbelow. A1.BudgetImpact:Expensestodateforpublicationandreviewoftherezoningand amendmenttoPUDapplicationfortheNAPAAutoPartsStoretotals$1107.78. ThisincludestimespentinpreliminaryreviewbytheCity’splanningconsultant, NAC. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staff’stimerelatedtotheprojectincludedpreparation andmailingofpublicnotice. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 2 B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethereimbursementoftheapplicationfeeanddepositfor NAPAAuto,totaling$2400,basedonafindingthatarelatedactionofvariance denialpreventedfurtherCityreviewasrelatedtothesubmittedlanduse applications. 2.MotiontodenythereimbursementoftheapplicationfeeanddepositforNAPA Auto. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1above.Theapplicantcouldnotproceedwiththe twoplanning-relatedapplicationsassubmittedwithoutanapprovaloftherequested vacation.Thedeniedvacationnecessitatedawithdrawalofbothapplications. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: None CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 1 5H.ConsiderationofapprovingarequestforConditionalUsePermitforVeterinary Facilities(Neighborhood)andanamendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopmentfor MonticelloBusinessCenter5th Addition/QuadDevelopment;Applicant:Quad Development,LLC (AS) ThePlanningCommissionreviewedtheserequestsduringtheirregularmeetingon May3rd,2011. ThePlanningCommissionrecommendedapprovalofboththeConditionalUse PermitforVeterinaryFacilityandtheamendmenttothePlannedUnit Development.ThePlanningCommissionnotedthatthebuildingelevations provideddidnotincludefinalcolorsandmaterials,whichisarequirementofthe PUD.ThePlanningCommissionsoughttoensureconsistencywiththeoriginally approvedbuildingswithinthePUDandwithbasiccoderequirements. Assuch,ina5-0vote,theCommissionrecommendedapprovalcontingentonthe submissionofafinalelevationdrawingtotheCommissionforreviewwithin30 days.TheConditionsofapprovalfurtherrequirethatthefinalelevationsmeetcode requirementsandmaintainconsistencywiththeoriginalPUD. OnMay17th,thePlanningCommissionheldaspecialmeetingandapprovedthe finalstagebuildingelevationdrawingsina5-0vote.Thefinalelevationdrawings areincludedwithCouncil’spacket. Property:OutlotA,MonticelloBusinessCenter5th Addition 4300SchoolBoulevard ThesubjectsiteislocatedwestofWalmartandeastofthe AutumnRidgeTownhomedevelopment,onthesouthside ofSchoolBoulevard. PlanningCaseNumber:2011-010 A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND: Request(s):AmendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopmenttoallowthe constructionofanapproximately7,680squarefoot commercialbuildingandaConditionalUsePermitto accommodateaVeterinaryFacility. DeadlineforDecision:June3rd,2011(60days) LandUseDesignation:PlacestoShop ZoningDesignation:B-4(RegionalBusiness) CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 2 ThepurposeoftheB-4,regionalbusinessdistrict,isto providefortheestablishmentofcommercialandservice activitieswhichdrawfromandservecustomersfromthe entirecommunityorregion. TheproposedPhaseIIdevelopmentforaVeterinary FacilityuserequiresaconditionalusepermitintheB-4 zoningdistrict. CurrentSiteUse:The4.5acresiteiscurrentlyplattedintoasinglebuildable lotandalargeoutlot.Lot1,Block1hasbeendevelopedas atwo-storymulti-tenantofficebuilding.Thebalanceofthe propertyisvacant. SurroundingLandUses: North:Vacant,zonedB-4 East:Residential,zonedR-3 AutumnRidgedevelopment,PlannedUnitDevelopment South:Commercial,zonedB-4 Walmart West:Commercial,zonedB-4 Walmart ProjectDescription: QuadDevelopmentisrequestinganamendmenttotheapprovedPlannedUnit DevelopmentforMonticelloBusinessCenter5th Additiontoaccommodatethe constructionofanapproximately7,680squarefootcommercialbuildingasPhaseIIof theapprovedQuadDevelopmentproject.TheamendmenttoPUDisrequiredasthe applicantisseekingtochangethefootprintsizeofthebuilding,thebuildingdesign, parkingconfiguration,andlandscapingtreatmentsforthePhaseIIsite. ThePhaseIIcommercialbuildingisintendedforuseasaveterinaryfacility,which requiresaConditionalUsePermitintheB-4District. Theapplicantalsointendstore-platalargerlotareathanoriginalillustratedonthe approvedpreliminaryplat,whichwillbeaccomplishedthroughthefinalplatprocess. PlannedUnitDevelopmentandOrdinanceRequirements: APlannedUnitDevelopmentallowsforflexibilityinperformancestandardswiththe understandingthatthedevelopmentwillbeheldtohigherstandardsofsiteandbuilding designthanwouldordinarilyberequired.Itistheapplicant’sresponsibilitytodesignthe developmentwithsignificantbenefitsandcommunicatethosebenefitstotheCity. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 3 Parking.TheoriginalPUDapprovalrequiredcross-easementsforparkingthroughout thesite.TheeasementswillberequiredtoremaininplaceforthePhaseIIsite developmentandwillbespecificallyaddressedwithinadevelopmentcontractforthe proposedre-plat. IntermsofparkingrequirementsforthePhaseIIdevelopment,theproposedbuilding totals7,680squarefeetofgrossfloorarea.Theparkingfortheproposedusesis calculatedasfollows. Use ProposedSquare Footage CodeRequirement RequiredSpaces Storage,Restrooms938sq.ft.00spaces Kennel844sq.ft.1spaceper400sqft2spaces Clinic5,897sq.ft.1spaceper250sqft24spaces TOTALREQUIREDSPACES 26spaces TheprovidedsiteplanillustratesthelimitsoftheparkingtobeconstructedwithPhaseII. Thesiteplanincludes12existingspacessubjecttothecross-easement,andthe constructionof22additionalspaceswiththePhaseIIdevelopment.TheCityEngineer hasrecommendedthattheapplicantprovideturningtemplateinformationforlarger vehiclesinordertoensureadequatecirculationthroughthesitewhenfullydeveloped. Theparkingconfigurationproposedisacceptable,subjecttothecross-easementand recommendationoftheCityEngineer. Landscaping.TheoriginallandscapingplanforthePlannedUnitDevelopmentexceeded therequirementsforcommercialsites,providing51overstorytreesandanintense foundationplantingplanforeachbuilding. TheoverstorytreesincludedacombinationoffourEmeraldLustreMaples,fourFallgold Ash,fiveSiennaGlenMaples,fourSkylineHoneylocusts,andfiveSwampWhiteOaks. TheoriginalPUDalsoincluded7AustrianPines,14BlackHillsSpruce,and8Colorado Spruces.Themajorityoftheoverstorytreesareproposedalongtheeastpropertyline,to provideabufferbetweenthesubjectsiteandthetownhomedevelopmenttotheeast. ThesetreeshavealreadybeenplacedwiththePhaseIofficebuildingdevelopment. Thenarrativeprovidedbytheveterinaryclinicproposesa3’rockgardenbedwitha mixtureoflowheightconiferousanddeciduousshrubsalongwithgrassesandflowering perennials.Thesuggestedlandscapingplandoesnotdetailtheexactspeciesorquantity, butwillberequiredtomeetorexceedtheapprovedfoundationlandscapingplan.(See pageL2oftheapprovedPUDpacket.) The32’x34’dogexerciseareaonthesouthsideofthepropertywillbefullyenclosed andtreatedwithmasonrypillarsofbrickorculturedstonewithaproposed5’fiberglass privacyfence.Thisareawillbefurtherscreenedwithdwarfspruceonthewestandsouth sides.Thenorthernsideyardwillfeatureasyntheticturfareawithadditionallandscape plantings,butwillnotbeenclosed. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 4 Inadditiontothetreeandshrubrequirements,pertheoriginalPUD,sodisrequired betweenthebuildingsandonthebacksideofeachbuilding.Theapplicant’snarrative indicatesthatthisrequirementwillbemet. AspartoftheoriginalPUD,aplazaareaislocatedattheentrancetotheproposed facility.Staffhasverifiedthatthisareahasbeenplantedpertheapprovedplan. Lighting.AphotometricplanwassubmittedfortheoriginalPUD.Thatplanindicates thatnoglareexceedingonefootcandlewillspilloverontotheadjacentright-of-wayor adjacentproperties.Themaximumfootcandlereadingalongtheeastpropertyline, adjacenttoAutumnRidge,is0.2.Anywallmountedlightingshallrequireafullcutoff fixture.Aphotometricplancompliantwiththeoriginalapprovalwillberequiredat buildingpermit. Signage.Thefrontfacadesoftheonestoryplusmezzaninebuildingswereproposedat 3,620squarefeeteach.UndertheoriginalPUD,eachofthesebuildingswasallowed181 squarefeetofsignage.Theapplicantisproposingapproximately105squarefeetofwall signageforthebuilding.Theapplicanthasindicatedthatsignplacementwillbeonthe northsideforthebuilding,facingSchoolBoulevard.Finalbuildingelevationswillbe requiredtoincludeplacementandsizingofallwallsignage. Inadditiontowallsignage,theoriginalPUDapprovalincludedtwomonumentsigns,one inthenortheastcornerofthesiteandoneinthenorthwestcornerofthesite.Thesesigns willcontainplacardsforuptosixtenants.Saidsignsareeach96squarefeetinareaand 15.33feetinheight,foratotalof192squarefeetofsignage.Theveterinaryclinichas indicatedthattheywillbeincludedwithintheexistingpylonsignageandnoseparate free-standingsignageisproposedforthesite. BuildingDesign.TheoriginalPlannedUnitDevelopmentillustratedan8,400square footbuildingfootprint.ThisapplicationforamendmenttoPUDindicatesinsteada7,680 squarefootbuilding.Thesmallerbuildingisshiftedslightlyeastwardtoaccommodate changesinbuildingdesign. TheoriginalPUDproposedfivebuildings,includingbothoneandhalf(mezzanine)and twostorystructures,allsimilarindesignandmaterials.TheproposedPUDamendment wouldvaryfromtheapproveddesignandmaterials. Thenarrativeandpreliminaryelevationstatesthatavarietyofmaterials,including Hardie-boardsiding,stone,andpre-formedsteeloraluminumwillbeusedonthe buildingexterior.Adraftbuildingelevationdrawinghasalsobeenprovided.However, theveterinaryclinichasindicatedthatthefinaldesignwillincludeadditionalfaçade detailandwindowfenestrationbeyondwhatisshownonthedraft.Theapplicantwill provideacoloredelevationattheCommissionmeeting. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 5 Theapplicantwillberequiredtosubmitafinalbuildingelevationdesignillustratingfinal materialsandlocationplacementconsistentwiththecoderequirementsbelowand compatibilitywiththeoriginalPUD. 1.Nogalvanizedorunfinishedsteel,galvalum,orunfinishedaluminumbuildings, exceptthosespecificallydesignedtohaveacorrosivedesignedfinishsuchas cortensteel,shallbepermittedinthedistrictslistedherein. 2.Buildingsinthesezoningdistrictsshallmaintainahighstandardofarchitectural andaestheticcompatibilitywithconformingsurroundingpropertiestoensurethat theywillnotadverselyimpactthepropertyvaluesoftheabuttingpropertiesand shallhaveapositiveimpactonthepublichealth,safety,andgeneralwelfare, insofaraspracticable. 3.ExteriorbuildingfinishesinthedistrictssubjecttothisSectionshallconsistof materialscompatibleingradeandqualitytothefollowing: (a)Brick (b)NaturalStone (c)Decorativerockfaceorconcreteblock (d)Cast-in-placeconcreteorpre-castconcretepanels (e)Wood,providedthatthesurfacesarefinishedforexterioruseandwoodof provenexteriordurabilityisused,suchascedar,redwood,orcypress (f)Glass (g)ExteriorInsulatedFinishsystems,wheresaidsystemismanufacturedto (h)replicatethelookofoneoftheapprovedbuildingmaterialsinthissection (i)Stucco 4.Metalexteriorfinishesshallbepermittedonlywherecoordinatedintotheoverall architecturaldesignofthestructure,suchasinwindowanddoorframes,mansard roofsorparapets,andothersimilarfeatures,andinnocaseshallconstitutemore than15%ofthetotalexteriorfinishofthebuilding. AccessandCirculation.TheoverallPlannedUnitDevelopmentsitehasoneaccess pointextendingsouthfromSchoolBoulevard.Theaccessis40feetinwidth,excluding theisland,withadequatespaceforturnlanes.Allinternaldrivelanesareproposedat24 feetinwidth,wideenoughtoaccommodatetwo-waytraffic.Across-accesseasement documentshallbeprovidedtotheCity,verifyingthatthelottobeplattedshallhave accesstoSchoolBoulevard. Pedestrianaccesswillbeaccommodatedbyaconcretesidewalkrunningalongthefront thebuilding.Acrosswalk,asoriginallyapproved,willconnecttheeastsideofthesiteto thewestsideofthesite. GradingandDrainage.ThePhaseIIdevelopmentwillproceedinaccordancewith previouslyapprovedgradingplans.TheCityEngineerhasreviewedtheplansin CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 6 relationshiptotheproposedsiteplanandhasprovidedcomments.Commentsfromthe CityEngineermaybefoundattachedasExhibitH. Utilities.ThePhaseIIdevelopmentwillproceedinaccordancewithpreviouslyapproved utilityplans.TheCityEngineerhasreviewedtheplansinrelationshiptotheproposed siteplanandhasprovidedcomments.CommentsfromtheCityEngineermaybefound attachedasExhibitH. ConditionalUsePermitRequirements: NeighborhoodVeterinaryFacilitiesarepermittedasconditionalusesintheB-4District. Tofollowisananalysisoftherequestpertheconditionalusepermitrequirements. 1.Treatmentshallbelimitedtosmallhouseholdpetsunlessthefacilityis conditionallypermittedasaruralveterinaryfacility. Theapplicanthasindicatedthattheveterinaryfacilitywillofferservicestosmall domesticanimalsonly. 2.IntheCCDdistrict,animalsshallonlybehousedovernightiftheyare undergoingmedicaltreatmentorobservation.Overnightboardingfor nonmedicalreasonsshallbeprohibited. Notapplicable.Itisnotedthatthenarrativeindicatesthatboardingfacilitieswill beprovidedtoclientsoftheveterinaryclinic. 3.Thesiteshallbedesignedtopreventanimalwastefrombeingexposedto stormwaterorenteringthestormwatersystem,streams,lakes,orconveyances. Theapplicant’snarrativeindicatesthatstaffon-sitewillmanagewasteandwill disposeofinappropriatefacilities.TheCityEngineermadespecificcomment relativetothestormwatersystem. 4.Ifanareaisprovidedforanimalswalking,itshallnotbeexposedtostormwater andthewasteshallimmediatelybepickedupanddisposedofproperly. Theapplicant’snarrativeindicatesthatstaffon-sitewillmanagewasteandwill disposeofinappropriatefacilities. Theapplicantnarrativeindicatesthattwooutdoorexerciseareaswillbeprovided. Thefirstexerciseareaisproposedforthesouthsideoftheprincipalbuildingand isapproximately32’x34’inarea. Thesecondoutdoorareaisproposedforthenorthsideofthefacilityandwillbe surfacedwithartificialturf. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 7 5.Animalsshallnotbekeptoutdoorsorbeallowedtoremainoutsideunsupervised. Theapplicantnarrativeindicatesthattwooutdoorfencedexerciseareaswillbe constructed.Animalswillbeallowedintheseareasduringdaytimehoursand willbeleashedwhenoutsideoffullyenclosedareas.Conditionslistedin ExhibitZprohibittheovernightkennelingofanimalsoutdoors. 6.Allanimalsmustbeleashed. Theapplicantnarrativestatesthatanimalswillbeleashedwhenoutside,withthe exceptionofthefullyenclosedexercisearea. 7.Nooutsidestorageofcarcasses. Nomentionofthisconditionwasmadeintheapplicantnarrative,butislistedasa conditionofapprovalwithinExhibitZ. 8.ThefacilityshallbesubjecttoanannualinspectionbyaCityHealthOfficerat owner'sexpense. TheCity’sAnimalControlofficerwillcompleteanannualinspectionandsubmit areporttobefiledwithConditionalUsepermit. AccessoryUseRequirements: TrashHandling.Thetrashhandlingenclosureservingthesiteissubjecttothe followingcodestandards: 1.Thelocationandconfigurationofscreeningforlargetrashhandlingand recyclingcollectionareasshallbedepictedonallrequiredlandscapingplans. TheprovidedSuggestedLandscapePlanillustratesthelocationoftheenclosure alongthesouthsideofthefacility. 2.Largetrashhandlingandrecyclingcollectionareasshallbefullyscreenedfrom adjacentproperties. Theapplicanthasindicatedthatthetrashhandlingwillbefullyenclosedwitha maintenance-freevinylfence.Thefinalelevationdrawingsforthisareashallbea requirementofthefinalsite/buildingelevationplan. 3.Incaseswhereaccesstolargetrashhandlingandrecyclingfaceapublicright- of-way,theaccesswayshallbescreenedwithanopaquegate.Chainlinkshall notbeusedforsuchgates. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 8 Thetrashenclosurewillbeservicedfromtheinterior(east-facing)sideandwill notfacearightofway.Theapplicanthasindicatedthatthegateswillalsobe constructedofmaintenance-freevinyl. 4.Compactorsthatareattachedtotheprincipalstructureshallbetotallyscreened fromeyelevelviewfrompublicstreetsandadjacentnonindustrialpropertiesbya screeningwallconstructedofthesamebuildingmaterialastheprincipal structure. Notapplicable. 5.Largetrashhandlingandrecyclingshallmeettherequiredsetbacksfor structuresasrequiredintheunderlyingzoningdistrict. TheB-4Districthasa0’lotlinesetbackandassuch,theproposedlocationmeets therequiredsetback. 6.Inallcases,largetrashhandlingandrecyclingcollectionareasshallbeatleast sixfeetfromasideorrearlotline,andshallnotbelocatedwithinfrontyardsor cornersideyards. Theproposedsiteplanillustratescompliancewiththisrequirement. 7.Ifawallordetachedaccessorystructureisusedtoscreenordefinealargetrash handlingandrecyclingcollectionarea,thebuildingmaterialsusedforthewallor accessorystructureshallbecompatiblewiththeprincipalstructureandbe readilyservedthroughswingingdoors. Theproposedmaterialfortheenclosureisamaintenance-freevinylinacolor compatiblewiththeprincipalbuilding.Finalelevationsfortheenclosureshallbe arequirementofthefinalbuildingelevationplan. 8.Areasintendedforlargetrashhandlingandrecyclingcollectionareasshallbe surfacedwithconcretethatmeetsorexceedsminimumCitystandards. Thisshallbearequirementofthefinalbuildingplan. 9.Eatingestablishmentsandotherusesthatproducesignificantamountsofliquid wasteshallconfigureareasintendedforlargetrashhandlingandrecycling collectionareastodraintothesanitarysewersystemthroughgreasetrapsor similardevicesasrequiredbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment. Notapplicable. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 9 RetailSales.Theapplicant’snarrativeindicatesthatalimitedamountofretailsaleswill occuronsite.Thezoningordinanceallowsretailsalesasapermittedaccessoryusefor officefacilitiesinaB-4,subjecttothefollowing: 1.Allsalesareconductedindoorswithinaclearlydefinedareaoftheprincipal buildingreservedexclusivelyforretailsales.Saidsalesareamustbephysically segregatedfromotherprincipalactivitiesinthebuilding. 2.Theretailsalesareamustbelocatedonthegroundflooroftheprincipalbuilding. 3.SalesArea.Theretailsalesactivityshallnotoccupymorethanfifteen(15) percentofthegrossfloorareaofthebuilding. Theapplicanthasindicatedtheirintenttocomplywiththeseconditions. PlatStandards: FinalPlat.ThesubjectsiteiscurrentlyplattedasOutlotAoftheMonticelloBusiness Center5th Addition.Theapplicantisproposingtofinalplataportionoftheexisting outlotforthePhaseIIsiteasLot1,MonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition. Thisreplatwillcreatealotlargerthanthatproposedunderthepreliminaryplat.The preliminaryplatplattedonlythebuildingfootprintforeachofthefivebuildings,withthe balanceofthepropertyplattedasanoutlot.Theproposedverterinaryclinicseekstoown alargerareaoutsideofthebuildingfootprintinordertoaccommodatetheiruseneedson thebuildingperimeter.ThedevelopmentcontractforPhaseIIwilladdresstheproposed lot’srelationshiptothebalanceofthesiteformaintenancepurposesandcross-easement documentswillberequiredtoaccommodateparkingandaccessconfigurationas proposed. UnderCityOrdinance,finalplatreviewandapprovaloccursatCityCouncil.The applicantintendstosubmittheirre-plat/finalplatforthereviewandapprovalofthe proposedMonticelloBusinessCenter5th AdditioninJune.Thefinalplatreviewwillalso includeanewdevelopmentcontractspecifictothe5th Addition. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: Decision1:ApprovalofanAmendmenttoConditionalUsePermitforPlannedUnit DevelopmentandConditionalUsePermitforVeterinaryFacility(Neighborhood) 1.MotiontoapprovetheamendmenttoConditionalUsePermitforPlannedUnit DevelopmentforMonticelloBusinessCenter5th Additionandapprovea ConditionalUsePermitforVeterinaryFacilityfortheproposedLot1,Block1, MonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition,contingentoncompliancewiththose conditionsspecifiedinExhibitZ. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 10 2.MotiontodenyapprovalofanamendmenttoConditionalUsePermitforPlanned UnitDevelopmentforMonticelloBusinessCenter5th Additionanddenythe ConditionalUsePermitforVeterinaryFacilityfortheproposedLot1,Block1, MonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition,basedonfindingstobemadebythe CityCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1forapprovaloftheConditionalUsePermitand amendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopment,subjecttotheconditionslistedinExhibitZ. ThePlanningCommissionunanimouslyrecommendsAlternative#1.Themajority ofconditionslistedwithinExhibitZisstandardtotheordinanceforveterinaryfacilities orarerelatedtofinalplatting. TheproposeduseisconsistentwiththeComprehensivePlanandwithzoningregulations fortheproperty,subjecttocompliancewiththestatedconditions. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: A.AerialImage B.ApplicantNarrative C.SitePlan D.LandscapeDescription E.SuggestedLandscapingPlan F.BuildingElevations G.ExteriorFinishes&ParkingDescription H.ApprovedPlans–QuadDevelopmentPUD(9/4/2007) I.CityEngineer’sCommentLetter,dated4/26/11 J.PlanningCommissionResolution2011-36 Z.ConditionsofApproval ExhibitZ–ConditionsofApproval ConditionalUsePermitforVeterinaryFacilityand AmendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopment OutlotA,MonticelloBusinessCenter5th Addition ProposedasLot1,Block1,MonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition 1.Theareaprovidedforanimalsshallnotbeexposedtostormwaterandthewasteshall immediatelybepickedupanddisposedofproperly. 2.Animalsshallnotbekeptoutdoorsovernightorbeallowedtoremainoutsideunsupervised. 3.Allanimalsmustbeleashed. 4.Nooutsidestorageofcarcassesshallbepermitted. 5.ThefacilityshallbesubjecttoanannualinspectionbyaCityHealthOfficeratowner'sexpense. 6.TheapplicantshallcomplywithfinalbuildingelevationsprovidedtothePlanningCommission onMay17th,2011,whichareconsistentwithcoderequirementsandcompatiblewiththeoriginal PUD. 7.Theapplicantshallsubmitafinalbuildingelevation/siteplanillustratingthefollowing: a.Thelocationandconfigurationoflandscapingofscreeningforlargetrashhandlingand recyclingcollectionareas. b.Largetrashhandlingandrecyclingshallbeatleastsixfeetfromasideorrearlotline, andshallnotbelocatedwithinfrontyardsorcornersideyards. c.Ifawallordetachedaccessorystructureisusedtoscreenordefinealargetrashhandling andrecyclingcollectionarea,thebuildingmaterialsusedforthewalloraccessory structureshallbecompatiblewiththeprincipalstructureandbereadilyservedthrough swingingdoors. d.Areasintendedforlargetrashhandlingandrecyclingcollectionareasshallbesurfaced withconcretethatmeetsorexceedsminimumCitystandards. e.Signplacementandsize. 8.Theapplicantshallsubmitadetailedlandscapingplanillustratingthefollowing: a.ThenumberandspeciesofplantingsinordertoverifycompliancewiththeoriginalPUD andbaselandscapingcoderequirements. b.Thelocation,number,speciesandconfigurationoflandscapingforlargetrashhandling andrecyclingcollectionareas. 9.Aphotometricplancompliantwiththeoriginalapprovalwillberequiredatbuildingpermit. 10.Across-accesseasementdocumentshallbeprovidedtotheCity,verifyingthatLot1,Block1of theproposedMonticelloBusinessCentershallhavedirectaccesstoSchoolBoulevardandto PUDparkingfacilities. 11.TheapplicantshallcomplywiththecommentsperCityEngineer’smemodatedApril26th,2011. 12.Theapprovalissubjecttothere-platandexecutionofDevelopmentAgreementforMonticello BusinessCenter6th Addition. CityCouncilAgenda:5/23/11 1 5I.ConsiderationofapprovingasubsidyfortheBuildingPlanCheckFeeforAroplax’s expansioninaccordancewiththeBusinessExpansionIncentivePilotProgram (MB) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: Asyoumayrecall,inJanuaryof2011theCouncilauthorizedthecontinuationofthe BusinessExpansionIncentiveProgram.Theprogram’sprimarypurposewasto encouragetheexpansionandgrowthofexistingMonticellobusinesses. TheCouncil’sauthorizationallowedforapilotprogramthatwouldrununtiltheendof 2011.Theapprovedprogramstructureallowedforapplicantstoreceiveupto$5,000in buildingorplanningfeereductions.Theassistancewouldbeappliedonlytotheplan reviewcomponentofthebuildingpermitcost,planningapplication,ordemolition permits. Toqualifyfortheprogram,applicantsneedtobeanexistingbusinessseekingtoexpand attheircurrentlocationorexpandatanewlocationnMonticello.Theapplicantalso needstodemonstrateanabilitytomeetatleasttwoofthefollowingcriteria: 1.Createorretainjobs. 2.Redevelopment,expansion,orrenewalofexistingvacantunderutilized existingcommercialorindustrialproperties/buildings,includingoneofthe following: a)Increasebuildingsquarefootage b)Increasebuildingvaluation c)Increasedvisualappearanceorfunctionoffacility d)Productorserviceexpansion e)OccurswithintheCentralCommunityDistrict CityStaffreceivedanapplicationfromAroplaxrequestingtoutilizethebusiness expansionincentiveprogramtoreceiveawaiverofthebuildingpermitplancheckfee. Aroplaxiscurrentlyworkingwiththebuildingdepartmenttobeginconstructionofan 18,240squarefootwarehouseaddition.Aroplaxisexperiencinggrowthandthereforehas aneedforadditionalwarehousespacetoopenupfloorareaforadditionalequipment purchases.Theproposedadditionisanticipatedtocreateapproximately4-6newjobs. TheBuildingOfficialhascalculatedtheplancheckfeeat$3,047.66. A1.BudgetImpact:ThecurrentcashbalanceofthepilotprojectintheLiquorStore Fundis$29,480.UponapprovaloftheAroplaxapplicationthefundbalance wouldbe$26,432. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffworkloadrequirementsconsistedofwritingthe Councilstaffreport. CityCouncilAgenda:5/23/11 2 B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovesubsidizingthe$3,047.66buildingplancheckfeeonthe buildingpermitforAroplax’swarehouseaddition. 2.Motiontodenybuildingplancheckfeesubsidy. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.AroplaxmeetstheobjectivesoftheapprovedBusiness ExpansionIncentivePilotprogrambyaddingsquarefootage,creatingadditionaljobs, increasingbuildingvaluationandfunctionalityoftheirexistingfacility. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: BusinessExpansionIncentivePilotApplication (thiswasnotavailableatprintingsowill beemailedorprovidedtoCouncilpriortothemeeting) CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 1 5J.ConsiderationofapprovingagreementbetweenMattMaierandtheCityof MonticellotoharvesthayandmaintainboulevardsonspecifiedCityproperties (BP) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: CouncilisrequestedtoapprovetheagreementwithMattMaierallowinghimtoharvest hayandmaintainboulevardsonCitypropertiesidentifiedintheleaseagreement.This symbioticdesignwasincludedintherightofwaymaintenanceplanportionofthe2011 MowingManagementPlanapprovedbyCouncil.Factorsusedindetermining maintenancefrequencyfollowthecityordinancepreviouslyestablished. Certaincitypropertieshavepotentialforharvestinghay.Theselocationshavebeen arrangedformaintenanceatnocosttotheCity,whichassistsstaffinfollowingthe ordinanceontheseproperties,controllingweedsandinvasiveplants,andalsoallowing stafftocompleteadditionalROWmowingmaintenanceasrequestedbyCouncil.The adjacentboulevardswillalsobecutinamannerthatreflectsordinancerequirementswith ahigherlevelofmowingthanhaying.Theadvantageinthisrelationshipisthatthe harvester,MattMaier,keepsthehay,withthenaturalgrassesservingasfeedforcattle thataresoldasnaturalbeef. ThelocationsthatweresuitableforhayingweretypicallymaintainedbytheCityStreet department,allowingsignificantreductionofmaintenanceforourstaffintheseareas. TheagreementlegallyprotectstheCityandthepropertyandestablishesabasisforfuture agreements,withrespecttoadditionallocations,allowingrenewable,extendableclauses andotherinclusions. A1.BudgetImpact:Asavingshasbeenincludedinbudgetedstafftime,offsetby additionalmowingmaintenanceassignedtoCityStaffbyCouncil. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Off-settingworkloadthereforenochangeintime required. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapprovetheagreementwithMattMaierallowinghimtoharvesthayand maintainboulevardsonCitypropertiesidentifiedintheleaseagreement. 2.MotiontodenytheleaseagreementwithMattMaier. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1approvingtheleaseagreementwithMattMaier allowinghimtoharvesthayandmaintainboulevardsonassignedCityproperties.This actionoffsetsadditionalmowingmaintenanceassignedtoCityStaffbyCouncil. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 2 D.SUPPORTINGDATA: CopyofLeaseAgreement LEASE TheCityofMonticello,505WalnutStreet,Suite#1,Monticello,Minnesota55362asLessor,herebyallowMattMaier, 12925ProsperityAve.Becker,Mn.55308,asLessee,thelandlyinginWrightCounty,Minnesota,to-wit: PID#’s,155035000010,155164000040,155164000030,213100151400,155194000010,155191000020, 155191000080,155194000050,155181000010,155194000030,155194000020,155171000050, 15501800150,155018003040,155177000010 Toharvestonsaidpremises,untoLessee,hisheirsandassigns,subjecttotheconditionsandlimitationshereinafter mentioned,forthetermofyeartoyearfromthe1stdayofJanuary,2011toDecember31,2011,forthesumof$0per year. And,inconsiderationthereof,saidLesseecovenantswiththesaidLessor,hisheirsandassigns,asfollows: RENT:Thathewillnotpayrentforsaidlandasabovespecified,butastohisservicewillmaintainthepropertyand boulevardsadjacenttoitsfrontageatarateconsistentwiththecitymowingpolicyorgreater; PLANTING:Thatthelesseewillharvestthenaturalfoliageonsaidlandallowingadditionalseedplantingonlyby writtenconsentoflessor,allactivitiesshallbeaccordingtothebestfarmingpracticesinitslocalityandprovidealltolls, implements,machineryandhiredhelpnecessarytothatend; SEED/FOLIAGEHARVESTING:Thatheshallusesaidlandandwillpromptlypayallharvestingbillsduringsaid term,andheshallbetheproprietorofsaidharvestedproduct,indemnifyingthelessorofliabilityforanyreason; WEEDS:Thathewillcontrolalllandfromweedsandassuchdestroysamebeforeseedsripenbycuttingorotherwise; PLOWING:Thatatnotimehewillplowanypartofsaidlandsforcropsofthecurrentorensuingyearwithoutconsent ofsaidLessorinwriting; ASSIGNMENTANDSUBLETTING:Thathewillneitherassignthisleasenorsubletanypartofsaidlandwithout consentofsaidLessorinwriting; SECURITYAGREEMENT:That,tosecureperformanceofthetermsandconditionsherein,Lesseeherebygrantsto Lessor,hisheirsandassigns,asecurityinterestincropsofeverykindwhicharegrowingnaturallyupontheselands,or whichmayhereafterbeplantedorgrowingontheabove-describedland. THISSECURITYAGREEMENTISSUBJECTTOTHETERMSPRINTEDONTHEREVERSESIDEHEREOF, WHICHAREMADEAPARTHEREOF. LESSEE’SRECEIPTFORCOPY TheundersignedLesseeherebyacknowledgesthereceiptfromtheLessorofatrue,correctandcompletecopy ofthe forgoingSecurityAgreementandLease. _____________________________________________________ MattMaier Date: _____________________________________________________ MonticelloCityAdministrator,JeffO’NeillDate: _______________________________________________________ Monticello Mayor,ClintHerbst Date: Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis_________dayof____________,2011. AcknowledgedBy:_________________________________ Notary LESSEEHEREBYAGREESTHAT: A.UNTILDEFAULT,Lesseemayretainpossessionoftheharvest,andmustoffsiteprocess,storeanduseitin anylawfulmannernotinconsistentwiththeagreementsherein. B.DEFAULT,LesseeshallbeindefaultunderthisAgreementuponthehappeningofanyofthefollowing events:(a)anyLesseebecomesinsolventorunabletopaydebtsastheymatureormakesanassignmentforthe benefitofthecreditors,oranyproceedingisinstitutedbyoragainstanylesseeallegingthatsuchlesseeis insolventorunabletopaydebtsastheymature;(b)theentryofanyjudgmentagainstanylessee;(c)deathof anylesseewhoisanaturalpersonorofanypartnerofanylesseewhichisapartnership;(d)dissolution,merger orconsolidation,ortransferofasubstantialpartofthepropertyofanylesseewhichisacorporationora partnership;(e)loss,theft,substantialdamage,destructionorencumbranceofanyofthecollateral;or(f)ifthe lessordeemshimselfinsecureforanyreason;(g)Inasmuchthelesseeshallindemnifythelessorofliabilityforany reason. C.REMEDIES.Ifanynoticeofsale,dispositionorotherintendedactionbyLessorisrequiredbylawtobe giventoLessee,suchnoticeshallbedeemedreasonablyandproperlygivenifmailedtoLesseeatthehome addressofLessee,oratsuchotheraddressofLesseeasmaybeshownonLessor’srecords,atleastten(10) daysbeforesuchsale,dispositionorotherintendedaction.WaiverofanydefaulthereunderbyLessorshallnot bewaiverofanyotherdefaultorofasamedefaultonalateroccasion.NodelayorfailurebyLessortoexercise anyrightorremedyshallbeawaiverofsuchrightorremedyandnosingleorpartialexercisebyLessorofany rightorremedyshallprecludeotherorfurtherexercisethereofortheexerciseofanyotherrightorremedyat anyothertime.Hereafterthelesseemustindemnifythelessorofliabilityforanyreason. LesseefurtheragreestopayallcostsandexpensesofLessor,includingreasonableattorney’sfees,inthe collectionofanyoftheobligationsortheenforcementofanyofLessor’srights. D.TERMINATION.ThisAgreementandthesecurityinterestinthecollateralcreatedherebyshallterminate whentheobligationshavebeencompleted. E.ADDITIONALPROVISIONS.(ifnone,insert“none”.) NONE G.TheSecurityAgreementcontainstheentireagreementbetweentheparties,andnooralagreementshallbe binding. City CouncilAgenda:5/23/11 1 7.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-40orderingImprovementsand authorizingRequestforProposalsforthe2011StreetLightingImprovementsfor 7th StreetEast,CityProjectNo.11C002 (BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: ByadoptingResolution#2011-40,Councilwillorderthe2011StreetLighting ImprovementsforEast7th StreetandauthorizestafftoprepareandsubmitaRequestfor ProposalstoWrightHennepinServices(WHS)toprovidebidstotheCityfor constructingandmaintainingtheproposedlightingimprovements. PerCouncildirection,theproposed2011StreetLightingImprovementsincorporatelight emittingdiode(LED)lightfixtures,similartothe2010StreetLightingImprovements alongSchoolBoulevardbetweenFenningandEdmonsonAvenues.Thiswasthefirst LEDlightingprojectinstalledbytheCity.Sincethesystemwasinstalledwehaveonly receivedonecomplaint,whichhadtodowiththefacttherewasnotastreetlightsystem inplacebeforesotheresidentwasnotusedtohavingalightshininginthebedroom windowatnight.Weareworkingwiththelightingsuppliertoaddressthisissueand, onceashadeforthelightfixtureisavailable,wewillpurchaseoneandinstallitonthe fixturetopreventlightfrombeingbroadcasttowardsthewindow. AswaspreviouslydiscussedwithCouncil,theprimaryadvantagesofLEDlighting includedecreasedmaintenanceandenergycosts,alongwithamoreuniformandlonger lastinglightingdistribution.LEDlightsarereportedtolastupto5timeslongerthan conventionalhighpressuresodium(HPS)streetlightswhileconsumingupto50%less energy.Thisclaimappearstobeveryaccuratebasedontheenergyconsumptiondata availabletodateforthenewSchoolBoulevardLEDsystem.Therefore,whileLEDlight fixturescostmoretopurchase,thesavingsrealizedoverthelifeofthefixtureisexpected tomorethanpayforthecostofthefixture. Theproposedlightingsystemconsistsofatotalof34lightassembliesincluding11 stand-alonestreetlights,19streetlightswithbacksidepedestrianlighting,and4stand- alonepedestrianlights.Thestreetlightassembliesconsistof130-wattLEDrectilinear (non-ornate)fullcut-offlightfixturesmountedon6-footmastarmson25-foottall aluminumpoleswithscrew-inbases.Wherestreetlightsareadjacenttopedestrian pathwaysa33-wattrectilinearfullcut-offlightfixturewouldbemountedonthebackside ofthelightpolesataheightofabout15-feetusing2-footmastarms.Whereonly pathwaylightingisneeded,15-foottallaluminumpoleswillbeinstalledonscrew-in basesonwhicha50-wattrectilinearfullcut-offlightfixturewillbemountedataheight of15-feetusing2-footmastarms. Councildirectedstafftodesignthe2011lightingimprovementsusingourstandardpole spacing/lightinglevelsasfoundonsimilarstreetsandpathwaysthroughouttheCity. Thisprovidesforamaximumpolespacingof350-feet,withpolesbeingstaggered betweenalternatingsidesofthestreetwherepractical.Wewerenotabletoalternate polesbetweenthetwosidesof7th Streetasregularlyaswenormallywouldsincemany City CouncilAgenda:5/23/11 2 propertiessouthof7th Streetareundeveloped,thepedestrianpathwayisonthenorthside of7th street,andtherearemoreaccessesonthenorthsidethanthereareonthesouth side.Therefore,byplacinglightsmoreregularlyalongthenorthsidewewillprovide betterstreetandpathwaylightingneareachoftheaccesses,therebyincreasingvisibility andsafetyforbothmotoristsandpedestriansatthesenaturalconflictpoints. Inthepast,Councilquestionedtheproposedleveloflightingwithsuchprojects. UnderstandingthatCouncilcouldhavesimilarconcerns,staffworkedwithSignature Lightingtodevelopaphotometricplanshowingthelightingfootprintforeachofthe lightsintheproposedLEDlightingsystem.Thisplanisattachedassupportingdata. PerpreviousCouncildirection,theproposeddesignincorporatesnon-ornamentalstyle fixtureandpoledesigns,similartothelightassembliesinstalledalongtheeastendof East7th StreetbytheUnionCrossingsdevelopment.Theselightfixturesprovidefullcut- offlightingforbothstreetsandpedestrianpathways.Elevationviewsofthethree proposedstreetandpathwaylightassembliesareattachedassupportingdata,asare picturesoftheexistinglightassembliesbyUnionCrossings. Assessmentsarenotbeingproposedforanyportionofthisprojectbecauseintersection lightingalreadyexistsalongEast7th StreetbetweenFallonAvenueandCedarStreetand theadjacentpropertiesincludeawidevarietyofusesincludingundeveloped, commercial,multiple-dwellingunits(MDU’s),andSaintHenry’schurch,manyofwhich wouldlikelyreceivelittletonobenefitfromtheproposedimprovements. StaffisaskingCounciltoadopttheattachedresolutionapprovingtheproposedEast7th StreetlightingimprovementsandauthorizingpreparationandsubmittalofaRequestfor ProposaltoWright-HennepinServices,whichistheonlycompanythatcanprovideboth constructionandmaintenanceservicestotheCity.ShouldCouncilrequestanychanges tothelightingsystemdesignthechangeswillofcoursebemadepriortocompletingand submittingtheRFPtoWright-HennepinServices. A1.BudgetImpact:Theestimatedcostsfortheproposedimprovementsareas follows: Estimatedconstructioncosts=$255,000 Estimatedmaintenancecosts=$11.50/pole/month=$391/month CurrentlytheCityhasabout$917,000intheStreetLightImprovementFund, whichwasgeneratedthroughtheCity’selectricfranchiseandisspecifically designatedforsuchstreetlightingimprovements.Staffproposestopayforthe proposedimprovementsfromthisfund. Maintenancecostsforstreetlightsarebudgetedforonanannualbasisthroughthe StreetDepartment.AstheCitycontinuestoinstallmoreLEDlightingsystems weshouldbeabletodecreasethecontractedmaintenancecostsforLEDsystems, oreveneliminatethemaltogether.Thiswouldthenallowustocontractwithan electricianonanannualbasisforallofourLEDlightingmaintenanceneeds. City CouncilAgenda:5/23/11 3 Staffwillcontinuetoexplorethisoptioninthefutureaswelearnmoreaboutthe actualmaintenancecostsforLEDlightingsystems.Meanwhile,staffwillwork withWright-HennepinServicestoaddaclausetotheirmaintenancecontractfor thisprojectallowingtheCitytooptoutofthecontractwithaminimumnotice period. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:StafffromtheEngineeringandPublicWorks Departmentswillspendtimemanagingandinspectingworkonthisprojectbut thisworkshouldnotinterferewithotherscheduledworktasks. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-40orderingImprovementsandauthorizing RequestforProposalsforthe2011StreetLightingImprovementsfor7th StreetEast, CityProjectNo.11C002. 2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2011-40atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1perthereasonsnotedherein. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2011-40 A-Planlayoutfor2011StreetLightingImprovements B-Photometricplanfor2011StreetLightingImprovements C-Elevationviewofproposedstreetandpathwaylightassemblies D-Cutsheetsofproposedstreetandpathwaylightassemblies E-PicturesofexistinglightassembliesbyUnionCrossings CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2011-40 ORDERINGIMPROVEMENTSANDAUTHORIZING REQUESTFORPROPOSALFORBIDS 2011STREETLIGHTINGIMPROVEMENTS–7th STREETEAST CITYPROJECTNO.11C002 WHEREAS,theCityCouncilonMarch28,2011,approveddesignoptionsanddirectedCityStaffto prepareaStreetLightingPlanfor7th StreetEast;and WHEREAS,theplananddesignfor2011StreetLightingImprovementsfor7th StreetEasthasbeen completed; NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota asfollows: 1.Saidimprovementsarenecessary,cost-effective,andfeasibleasdetailedinthedesignplan, whichisonfileintheofficeoftheCityClerkandareherebyapproved. 2.Itisadvisable,expedientandnecessarythatsaidimprovementsbeconstructed,andthesame areherebyorderedmade. 3.TheCityEngineerisherebydirectedtoprepareaRequestforProposalforsaidimprovements, andtosubmittheRFPtoWrightHennepinServicesforbids. 4.TheRFPsubmissionsshallbereviewedandCityCouncilshallletthecontractforallorpartof theworkforsaidimprovementsororderallorpartoftheworkdonebydaylabororotherwise asauthorizedbyMinnesotaStatutes,Section429.041,Subdivision2withinoneyearofthe dateofthisresolutionorderingsaidimprovements. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis23rd dayofMay,2011. CITYOFMONTICELLO ___________________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:5/23/11 1 8.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-41authorizingpreparationof FeasibilityReportforWalnutStreetBoulevardImprovements,CityProjectNo. 11C003 (BW/BP) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: AsCouncilisaware,asignificantnumberoftheexistingbrickpaversthatwereinstalled intheboulevardareasalongWalnutStreetaboutthetimetheCommunityCenterwas beingconstructedaredeterioratingandneedtobereplaced.Thepavershavedeteriorated asaresultofnothavingasealantappliedtothemaftertheirinitialinstallationandonan ongoingbasisafterwardstopreventtheintrusionofwaterandsalt.Alayoutisattached assupportingdatashowingtheareasoftheexistingbrickpavers. AlsoattachedarepicturesofthevariousbrickpaverareasalongtheWalnutStreet corridor.Ascanbeseen,anumberofpavershavedeterioratedtothepointthatthey presenttriphazardstopedestrians,ofwhichmanyaretoddlersandtheelderlywhoutilize theLibraryandtheCommunityCenter.Thoughmostofthepaversdonotrepresenttrip hazardsyet,manyareshowingsignsofdistressandwillquicklydeterioratetothepoint wheretheywillbecometriphazardswithinthenextyearortwo.Thisbecamevery evidentlastyearwhenCommunityCenterstaffreplacedsomeofthepavers;forevery pavertheyremoved,theyhadtoreplaceseveralothersarounditastheyalsobeganto crumblewhendisturbed. TheFeasibilityReportwillexplorethecostsassociatedwithremovingtheexistingbrick paversandreplacingthemwithstamped,coloredconcrete.Theproposedstamppattern willlikelybeabrickpatternsimilartowhatexiststoday,withatanorlightredcolor. TheFeasibilityReportwillalsoaddressthecostsassociatedwithreplacingtheexisting brickpaversinphases,basedonthecurrentconditionofthebricksinvariousareas.This canbedoneinphasesbecausethereareafewareasthatareweatheringbetterthanother areas,suchasthewalkwayalongtheSwansculptureinfrontoftheCommunityCenter. Assuch,theseareasmightbeabletobelimpedalongforanotheryearortwountilthey needtobereplaced.Thedrawbacktothisapproachisthatthebrickpatternsalongthe corridorwillnotbeconsistentunlessallthepaversareremovedandreplacedatonce.In addition,batchesofcoloredconcreteareoftendifferentwhenpouredatdifferenttimes, especiallyifthepoursarecompletedyearsapart.Stampingpatternsmayalsobehardto matchifdoneyearsapart. Availablefundingsourcesfortheidentifiedimprovementsincludespecialassessments, bondsales,theLiquorFund,andtheStreetReconstructionFund. Staffwouldnotrecommendtheuseofspecialassessmentstofundthisprojectasmanyof thepropertyownersalongWalnutStreetlikelyjustmadetheirfinalpaymentforthe initialbrickpaverassessments,whichobviouslydidn’tlastaslongasanticipated.That said,thereareabout30failingsidewalkpanelsalongWalnutStreetadjacenttoCargill KitchenSolutionsandifthesearereplacedaspartoftheprojecttheuseofassessments maybeappropriateduetothenatureandlocationofthoseimprovements. CityCouncilAgenda:5/23/11 2 TheCitycouldalsofundallorpartoftheimprovementsthroughthesaleofbonds.Bond ratesarecurrentlyaround3.5%. TheLiquorFundhasacurrentbalanceofabout$2,500,000andcouldthereforebeused topayforallorpartoftheimprovements. TheCitybudgetsbetween$250,000and$500,000annuallyforstreetreconstruction projects.TheStreetReconstructionFundhasacurrentbalanceofalittlemorethan $2,700,000sothisfundcouldalsobeusedtopayforallorpartoftheproject. Itisanticipatedthatacombinationoftheabovefundingsourceswillfund100%ofthe project.Staff’spreliminaryrecommendationistousetheStreetReconstructionFundto fundtheentiretyoftheproject. ThefirststepinmovingthisprojectalongistoauthorizestafftoprepareaFeasibility Reportthatwillservetoidentifythescopeoftheproposedimprovements,theestimated costs,availablefundingsources,preliminaryprojectschedule,anddeterminationastothe necessity,feasibilityandcost-effectivenessoftheproject.Staffbelievesthisreportcould becompletedin-houseandpresentedtoCouncilonJune27th;ifapprovedbyCouncil, thiswouldthenallowforaprojecttobeletinlateJulyorearlyAugustforcompletionby theendofSeptember.Thisschedulewilldependinlargepartonthefundingsources utilizedtopayfortheimprovements. A1.BudgetImpact:Areasonablecostestimateforremovingalltheexistingbrick paversalongtheWalnutStreetcorridorasidentifiedontheattachedlayoutand repavingalltheopenareaswithstamped,coloredconcreteisabout$100,000.If thescopeoftheprojectisreducedtheestimatedcostcouldbereducedaswell. ItshouldbenotedthattheCity’s2011budgetand5-yearCapitalImprovement Plandonotincludefundsfortheentireproject.However,the2011budgetdoes include$10,000forreconstructingtheWalnutStreetcrosswalksothisamount couldbedeductedfromtheoverallprojectcost. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:NumerousstafffromtheCommunityCenter,Public WorksandEngineeringDepartmentswillworkontheFeasibilityReport,which willbecompletedin-house. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-41authorizingpreparationofFeasibility ReportforWalnutStreetBoulevardImprovements,CityProjectNo.11C003. 2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2011-41atthistime. CityCouncilAgenda:5/23/11 3 C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1. Aswasnotedearlier,thedeterioratingbrickpaverspresenttriphazardstopedestriansin thearea.Staffthereforebelievesthiswillbeanongoingissueandthatthepaversshould berepairedorreplacedasquicklyaspossible.Inaddition,ashasbeenmentioned numeroustimesoverthelastfewyears,bidpricesareextremelycompetitiverightnow and2011lookstobeanotheryearwithcompetitivecontractorpricing. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2011-41 A-Layoutofexistingbrickpaverareas B-Picturesofexistingbrickpavers CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2011-41 ORDERINGFEASIBILITYREPORTFOR WALNUTSTREETBOULEVARDIMPROVEMENTS CITYPROJECTNO.11C003 WHEREAS,itisproposedtoimprovetheboulevardareasofWalnutStreetbetweenWest7th StreetandWestBroadwaybyreplacingdeterioratedbrickpaverswithstamped,coloredconcrete includingtheadjustment,construction,reclamation,removal,and/orrepairofexistingpavement, curbandgutter,sidewalk,andothernecessaryappurtenantwork,andtoassessthebenefitting propertiesforalloraportionofthecostoftheimprovements,pursuanttoMinnesotaStatutes, Chapter429. NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:ThattheproposedimprovementbereferredtotheCityEngineerforstudy,and thattheCityEngineerisinstructedtoreportbacktotheCouncilwithallconvenientspeed advisingtheCouncilinapreliminarywayastowhethertheproposedimprovementisnecessary, cost-effective,andfeasible;whetheritshouldbestbemadeasproposedorinconnectionwith someotherimprovement;andtheestimatedcostoftheimprovementasrecommended. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis23rd dayofMay,2011. CITYOFMONTICELLO ________________________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 1 9.ConsiderationofapprovingaMapleStreetright-of-wayriverbankrestorationproject (AS/BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: AttheApril11th meetingoftheCityCouncil,residentJoeMahoneyaddressedtheCity Council,indicatingthathewasarecipientofa2010WrightCountySoilandWater ConservationDistrictshorelinerestorationgrantandwouldbecompletingarestoration projectalonghisMississippiriverbankproperty,adjacenttotheMapleStreetrightof way. Mr.MahoneyrequestedthattheCityCouncilconsiderrestorationofaportionofthe City-ownedMapleStreetright-of-wayareaatthesametimeastherestorationofhis property.Heindicatedthatthefirmcompletingtherestoration,MNNativeLandscapes, hadprovidedanestimateforthisworkandindictedthattherewouldbesomesavingsif theROWshorelinewasrestoredincoordinationwiththeshorelineofhisproperty.The MNNativeLandscapesestimateincludeda33’portionoftheright-of-way. CouncildirectedstafftoreviewtheproposalbyMNNativeLandscapesandprovidea follow-uprecommendationtotheCityCouncilregardingthepossibleproject. StaffbelievesthattherestorationoftheMississippiRivershoreline,particularlyinareas ofsevereerosion,isanimportantpriority.However,uponreview,staffbelievesthere maybeanopportunitytopartnerwithWrightCountySoilandWaterConservation District(WCSWCD)toachieveabroadergoalandproject.Staffistherefore recommendingthatCouncildelayconsiderationofsuchaprojectuntil2012. WorkingwithWCSWCDoverthenexttenmonths,afeasibilityreportandplancanbe developedforeachoftheright-of-wayareasalongtheriverthatareownedandmanaged bytheCity,ratherthanjustaportionoftheMapleStreetright-of-way.WithWCSWCD, theCitycandevelopaclearplanforthoseareasinmostneedofrestorationand potentiallyapplyforcost-sharefundingthroughWCSWCD.Staff’sintentistopresenta plantotheCityCouncilnextMarchforreviewandapproval. Inaddition,therearelikelyopportunitiestomergeshorelinerestorationwithstormwater managementimprovementsandpublicaccessopportunities.Infact,Councilwillrecall thatoneoftheprimaryfindingsfordenialoftheearliervacationrequestforMapleStreet wasthelikelihoodthattheMinnesotaPollutionControlAgencywouldbemandating sometypeofstormwatertreatmentinthedowntownareainthenearfuture.Therightof wayswillbecriticaltodevelopmentoftreatmentoptionsforthedowntown.Byworking withWCSWCD,theCitycanbeproactiveinresearchingoptionsforthisstormwater treatment. Likewise,ithaslongbeenthegoaloftheCitytoprovidepointsofpublicaccesstothe riverfront.TheabsenceofacontinuoustrailalongtheMississippilimitspublicaccessto therivertothecurrentCityparksystem.However,theremayberightofwaylocations CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 2 bettersuitedforpublicconnectionstotheMississippiRivershorelinethanother locations.Therefore,staffisrequestingsometimetoresearchtheseopportunitiesin hopesoffindingthebestwaytointegratethepublicaccesswithshorelinerestoration improvements. Lastly,delayingtheprogramto2012mayprovidetheCityasimilarWCSWCDcost- shareopportunityfortherestoration,whichwouldreducetheCity’scostsfor implementation.TheWCSWCDprogramprovidesmatchingfundstolandownersforthe restorationofshorelineareastopreventfurthererosion.Ultimately,bypreventing erosion,theprogramhelpsreducepollution,therisksandcostsofflooding,andtheloss ofadditionalshorelandandwildlifehabitat. InregardMr.Mahoney’soriginalrequesttocompletethecollaborativerestoration projectthisyear,theMNNativeLandscapesproposaloutlinesaplantorestorethe MississippiRiverbankalong33’(orapproximatelyhalf)oftheshorelineontheCity’s MapleStreetright-of-way.Theplanistoremoveallexistingvegetation,stabilizethe riverbankusingabio-engineeringtechniquewhere20”and16”Coirlogsandcoconut blanketarestakedalongtheinsideofthecutbank,whichisthenbackfilledwith engineeredsoilandplantedwithacombinationofPrairieCordgrass,RiverBulrush,and livestakesofvariousWillowandDogwoodspecies.Oncetheseplantingsarecomplete theexposedsoilwillbeseededwithsiteappropriategrassandflowerspecies.The estimatedcostforcompletingthisworkis$5,790.54. IftheCityCouncilelectstocompletetherestorationasnotedabovein2011,therewould benograntfundsavailabletotheprojectatthistime. Insummary,althoughthisproposalprovidesimmediaterestorativebenefitintheMaple Streetshorelandarea,staffbelievesthatbroaderbenefitsmaybeachievedthroughamore detailedreviewandplanningeffort. A1.BudgetImpact:Budgetimpactsrelatedtothisitemwilldependonthescopeof theriverbankrestorationprojectdevelopedbystaff. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:TheworkloadsofvariousstafffromtheCommunity Development,Engineering,FinanceandPublicWorksDepartmentswillbe impactedtovaryingdegrees. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: Decision1:ApprovalofaMapleStreetright-of-wayriverbankrestorationproject. 1.MotiontoapproveimplementationoftherestorationoftheMapleStreetright-of- wayfor2011basedontheproposalpreparedbyMNNativeLandscapesatan estimatedcostof$5,790.54. CityCouncilAgenda:05/23/11 3 2.MotiontodenyimplementationoftherestorationoftheMapleStreetright-of- wayriverbankrestorationprojectatthistime. Decision2:Developmentofaright-of-wayrestorationfeasibilityreport. 1.Motiontoapprovedevelopmentofaright-of-wayriverbankrestoration FeasibilityReportforCouncilconsiderationin2012. 2.Motiontodenydevelopmentofaright-of-wayriverbankrestorationFeasibility Reportatthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: ForDecision1,CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#2forthereasonsnotedherein. Subsequenttothatdecision,CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1underDecision2, whichwouldallowstafftodeterminethefeasibilityofabroaderMississippiRiverright- of-wayrestorationproject. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: MNNativeLandscapesProposal–MapleStreetROW AerialImage–MahoneypropertyandMapleStreetROW