City Council Agenda Packet 06-13-2011AGENDA
SPECIALWORKSHOP–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL
Monday,June13,2011–5:00p.m.
MississippiRoom,MonticelloCommunityCenter
Mayor:ClintHerbst
CouncilMembers:LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta,BrianStumpf
1.CalltoOrder
2.PurposeofWorkshop:ProposalrelatedtoSilverSpringsGolfCourseareaandGoal-
settingpresentation
3.Workshop–ProposalforSilverSpringsGolfCourse,JohnBlumentritt
4.Workshop–Goal-settingPresentation
5.Adjournment
CityCouncilWorkshopAgenda:06/13/11
1
3.SilverSpringsConceptDiscussion
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
Alarge-scaleseasonalresidentialdevelopmentconcepthasbeenpresentedtocitystaff
fortheSilverSprings/BradPaumanarea.Thedevelopmentareaiseligiblefor
annexation(ifacceptabletotheCity)asitisintheOrderlyAnnexationareaandaportion
touchestheCitylimits.JohnBlumentritt,theprojectproposerwillbepresenttodiscuss
hisideaswiththeCityCouncil.
BlumentritthasbeenprovidedwithdetailedinformationonthatplanningprocessbyCity
staff.Thisseasonalhomeconceptisveryuniqueandhighlycomplexinnatureand
wouldrequireanintensiveandexpensiveplanningprocess.Beforeproceedingtothe
firststepinthisformalplanningprocess,hehasrequestedtheopportunitytospeakwith
thefullCityCouncilregardinghisideas,duetotheirscopeandscale.
Mr.Blumentritt’sgoalisforCounciltoprovidehimwithdirectiononwhetherthe
conceptitselfisofinteresttotheCityfromalanduseandfeasibilityperspective.
If,afterreviewingtheproposal,theCityCouncilisinterestedinpursuingthepossibility
further,adetailedanalysiswillneedtobeconductedasoutlinedintheattachedstaff
letter.
B.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.AerialImage–NorthwestArea
B.MonticelloComprehensivePlanChapter3
C.StaffLettertoMr.JohnBlumentritt,3/2/11
Land Use | 3-12008 Comprehensive Plan
3Land Use
Th e future vision for Monticello provides the foundation for the Compre-
hensive Plan (the vision statement appears in Chapter 1). Th e Land Use
Plan, in turn, provides the framework for how land will be used to help
achieve the future vision for Monticello. Th e Land Use Plan seeks to rein-
force desirable land use patterns, identify places where change is needed
and guide the form and location of future growth.
Th e Land Use Plan for Monticello was shaped by a variety of factors,
including:
Community input gathered through public workshops and Task Force
discussions.
Th e existing built and natural environment in Monticello.
Th e vision for Monticello’s future.
Factors described in the Community Context chapter of the Plan.
Systems plans for transportation, sanitary sewer and water supply.
Th is represents a departure in form from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan.
Th e 1996 Plan included the land use plan as part of a broader Develop-
ment Framework section. Th e 1996 Plan described Monticello’s land use
plan by general district of the community as a means of attending to the
unique issues in each district. Th e 2008 Update of the Comprehensive
Plan establishes a separate land use chapter consisting of the following
components:
A section on Future Growth describes the implications of future resi-
dent growth and the amount of growth anticipated by the Plan.
Th e Land Use Plan Map (see Figure 3-2) shows the land uses assigned
to each parcel of land.
Land Use Categories further explain the Land Use Plan by describing
the land uses depicted in the Map. Th is section includes land use poli-
cies describe the objectives that Monticello seeks to achieve through
the implementation of the Land Use Plan and the supporting elements
of the Comprehensive Plan.
Focus Areas provide a more detailed discussion of characteristics,
goals and policies for key areas of the community.
Chapter Contents
Future Growth ............................3-2
Growth Policies ........................3-2
Land Use Plan Map ....................3-3
Land Use Categories .................3-3
Places to Live .............................3-5
Places to Work .......................3-10
Places to Shop ........................3-13
Downtown ..............................3-13
Mixed Use ...............................3-14
Places to Recreate .................3-15
Places for Community ..........3-15
Urban Reserve .......................3-15
Interchange Planning Area .3-16
Private Infrastructure ...........3-16
Greenway ...............................3-16
Focus Areas ..............................3-16
Northwest Monticello ..........3-16
Downtown Focus Area ........3-19
South Central Focus Area ...3-22
East Focus Area .....................3-23
3-2 | Land Use City of Monticello
Future Growth
In looking to the future, Monticello must not just con-
sider the qualities of the future community, but also
the nature of growth. Assumptions about the amount
and pace of future growth are important parts of the
foundation for the Comprehensive Plan. Growth has
several important implications for the Comprehensive
Plan:
Growth projections are used to plan for the capacity
of municipal utility systems.
Growth projections are used to create and manage
fi nance plans for capital improvements.
The school system uses growth projections to
forecast enrollments and to plan for programs and
facilities.
Market studies use growth projections to analyze
the potential for locating or expanding businesses
in Monticello.
Th e characteristics of growth infl uence the amount
of land needed to support this development.
Growth adds trips to the local street system.
Assumptions about growth infl uence the policies
and actions needed to implement the Compre-
hensive Plan.
For these reasons, it is essential that the Comprehensive
Plan state assumptions of the nature of future growth.
A challenge in forecasting future residential develop-
ment is that the Comprehensive Plan infl uences, but
does not control, the factors that determine where
people live. Th ese factors include:
Quality of life.
Access to employment.
Availability of desired housing and neighborhood
options.
Aff ordability.
Competition from other places in the region.
Given these uncertainties, the Comprehensive Plan
seeks a balance between optimism and prudence.
For many reasons, the Plan should not signifi cantly
understate the growth potential of Monticello. Th e
balancing force lies with the implications of assuming
more growth than is reasonable. Th e chart in Figure
3-1 shows the projection of future residential growth
assumed in the Comprehensive Plan.
Th e projections assumes that the rate of growth slowly
rises over the next fi ve years and continues at a level of
190 units per year from 2012 to 2020. Th is amount falls
below the 229 units/year average for 2001 through 2005.
Th is rate of growth is intended to refl ect several factors.
Monticello will remain a desirable place to live, attract-
ing both builders and residents. Housing market condi-
tions will improve from the weaknesses experienced in
2006 and 2007. A combination of market conditions,
local policy objectives, and changing demographics
may reduce the potential for achieving and sustain-
ing higher rates of residential growth. Slower future
growth refl ects the belief that achieving the objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan, in particular seeking more
move up housing, will result in less development than
in previous years.
Growth Policies
1. Th e City will consistently review recent develop-
ment trends and update growth projections to serve
as a basis for public and private planning.
2. Over the life of this Comprehensive Plan, growth
will occur within the boundaries of the current
municipal boundaries and the Orderly Annexation
Area.
242
223
208
229
256
30 30
50
70
90
110
130
150150150150150150150167
77
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
Actual
Projected
Figure 3-1: Growth Trends and Projections
Land Use | 3-32008 Comprehensive Plan
3. Future development should be guided to locations
that utilize existing infrastructure and locations
that facilitate the construction of street and utility
systems that meet the objectives of the Compre-
hensive Plan.
4. Th e Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate action
by Monticello to annex or extend utility systems to
property immediately north of the Mississippi Riv-
er. Development in this area will place additional
traffi c on STH 25 (particularly in the Downtown
area) and channel investment away from other
parts of the City, especially the Downtown.
Land Use Plan Map
Th e Land Use Plan Map (shown in Figure 3-2) shows
the desired land use for all property in Monticello and
the Orderly Annexation Area Th e land use plan de-
picted in this map builds on the previous community
planning in Monticello.
Th e Comprehensive Plan uses the Land Use Plan to
defi ne the broad land use patterns in Monticello. Th e
Land Use Plan seeks to:
Organize the community in a sustainable man-
ner.
Make effi cient use of municipal utility systems and
facilitate the orderly and fi nancially feasible expan-
sion of these systems.
Provide the capacity for the type of growth desired
by the community.
Th e Land Use Plan Map is only one piece of the land
use plan for Monticello. Th e other parts of the Land
Use chapter of the Comprehensive Plan work with this
map to explain the intent and objectives for future land
use. Further, this map lays the foundation for land use
controls that are used by the City to implement the
Comprehensive Plan.
Land Use Categories
Th e Land Use Plan Map uses a set of specifi c categories
to guide land use in Monticello. One element missing
from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan was a description
of the land use categories shown in the Land Use Plan.
Th e ability to use the Comprehensive Plan as an eff ec-
tive land use management tool requires a defi nition of
each land use. Th ese defi nitions provide a common
understanding of the basic characteristics of each cat-
egory used in the Land Use Plan.
Th e 1996 Plan relies on three basic categories of private
land use: residential, commercial and industrial. Each
of these categories is further divided into subcategories
that distinguish between the character, type and inten-
sity of development desired in diff erent locations.
Th e 2008 update of the Comprehensive Plan uses a dif-
ferent approach to achieve similar land use patterns.
Th e Land Use Plan map depicts series of “places” for
private development: Places to Live, Places to Shop,
Places to Work, and Downtown. Th is approach is based
on the following rationale:
Th ese broad categories more clearly illustrate the
pattern of development and the plan for future
growth.
Although residential land uses vary by type and
density, they share many public objectives.
Th is approach makes a more enduring compre-
hensive plan. Th e Plan can guide an area for the
appropriate land use without the need to predict
future community needs and market forces.
Th e Plan relies on policies, land use regulations,
performance standards and public actions to pro-
vide a more detailed guide for land use and devel-
opment. Th is approach conveys more fl exibility
and control to the City Council and the Planning
Commission.
Role of Zoning Regulations
Zoning regulations play a critical role in implementing land use plans in
Monticello. State Law gives zoning regulations priority over the Comprehensive
Plan. If land uses are diff erent, zoning regulations control the use of land.
Zoning regulations are particularly important in the application of the land
use categories in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. The “places to” land
use categories set forth a broad and fl exible land use pattern for Monticello.
Zoning regulations (and other land use controls) will be used to determine the
appropriate location for each form of development and other regulations on
the use of land, consistent with policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
3-4 | Land Use City of Monticello
Figure 3-2: Land Use Plan Map
10
10
2
5
14
11
43
50
68
5
81
94
25
75
18
117
39
10
6
37
1
3
1
0
0
.
5
1
0.
2
5
Mi
l
e
s
Ma
r
c
h
1
3
,
2
0
0
8
Da
t
a
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
M
n
D
N
R
,
S
h
e
r
b
u
r
n
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
W
r
i
g
h
t
Co
u
n
t
y
,
a
n
d
W
S
B
&
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
.
Le
g
e
n
d
Pl
a
c
e
s
t
o
L
i
v
e
Pl
a
c
e
s
t
o
S
h
o
p
Pl
a
c
e
s
t
o
W
o
r
k
Pl
a
c
e
s
t
o
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
e
Pl
a
c
e
s
f
o
r
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
Mi
x
e
d
U
s
e
In
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A
r
e
a
Ur
b
a
n
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Ri
v
e
r
s
a
n
d
S
t
r
e
a
m
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
a
t
e
r
s
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
We
t
l
a
n
d
s
(
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
&
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
a
t
e
r
s
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
i
e
s
)
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
Fu
t
u
r
e
B
r
i
d
g
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
o
r
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
R
o
a
d
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
o
r
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
R
o
a
d
Po
w
e
r
l
i
n
e
Mo
n
t
i
c
e
l
l
o
C
i
t
y
B
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
Or
d
e
r
l
y
A
n
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
A
r
e
a
Land Use | 3-52008 Comprehensive Plan
Th e remainder of this section describes the categories
used in the Comprehensive Plan in greater detail.
Places to Live
Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks to create and sustain
quality places for people to live in Monticello (see Figure
3-3). Th is category designates areas where housing is
the primary use of land. Th e emphasis behind Places to
Live is to help ensure that Monticello off ers a full range
of housing choices, while preserving and enhancing the
quality of neighborhoods. Although a single land use
category, Places to Live does not suggest housing is a
homogenous commodity or that any type of housing
is desirable or allowed in any location.
When someone says “house” the most common image
is a single family detached dwelling. Th is housing style
is characterized by several features. Th ere is a one-to-
one relationship between house and parcel of land - the
housing unit is located on a single parcel. Th e house is
not physically attached to another housing unit. Th e
housing is designed for occupancy by a single family
unit. Th e typical neighborhood in Monticello is made
up exclusively of single family detached homes.
Th e primary variables become the design of the sub-
division, the size of the lot and the size and style of the
dwelling. Many older neighborhoods in Monticello
(north of Interstate 94) were built on a traditional grid
street system. Over the past thirty years, development
patterns have moved to a new suburban curvilinear
Figure 3-3: Land Use Plan - Places to Live
3-6 | Land Use City of Monticello
pattern, characterized by curvilinear street layout with
the use of cul-de-sacs.
A variety of factors, including consumer preference
and housing cost, have increased the construction of
attached housing in recent years. Duplexes, twin homes
quads and townhomes are common examples of this
housing style. Although the specifi c form changes,
there are several common characteristics. Each hous-
ing unit is designed for occupancy by a single family.
Th e housing units are physically attached to each other
in a horizontal orientation.
Places to Live will include some neighborhoods de-
signed to off er a mixture of housing types and densities.
Mixed residential neighborhoods create a pattern of
that combines single-family detached housing with a
mixture of attached housing types. Using good design
and planning, these mixed residential neighborhoods
can achieve a higher density without compromising
the overall integrity of the low-density residential pat-
tern.
Th is integration strengthens neighborhoods by increas-
ing housing choice and aff ordability beyond what is
possible by today’s rules and regulations. It also avoids
large and separate concentrations of attached housing.
It enhances opportunities to organize development in
a manner that preserves natural features.
A complete housing stock includes higher density
residential areas that consist of multi-family housing
types such as apartments and condominiums. In the
near term, the Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate
expanding the existing supply of higher density hous-
ing. It is likely that Monticello will need additional
higher density housing to:
Provide housing suited to the needs of an aging
population.
Facilitate redevelopment in the Downtown or in
other appropriate locations of the community.
Provide housing needed to attract the work force
required to achieve economic development goals
of the City.
Higher density residential land uses should be located
where the setting can accommodate the taller buildings
and additional traffi c.
Policies – Places to Live
Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the following
objectives for residential land use in Monticello:
Provide a range of housing choices that fi t all stages 1.
of a person’s life-cycle (see below).
Support development in areas that best matches the 2.
overall objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Develop quality neighborhoods that create a sense 3.
of connection to the community and inspire sus-
tained investment. Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks
to maintain the quality and integrity of existing
neighborhoods by encouraging the maintenance of
property and reinvestment into the existing housing
stock. Changes in housing type should be allowed
only to facilitate necessary redevelopment.
Create neighborhoods that allow residents to 4.
maintain a connection to the natural environment
and open spaces.
Seek quality over quantity in residential growth. 5.
Achieving the objectives for quality housing and
neighborhoods may reduce the overall rate of
growth.
Reserve areas with high amenities for “move up” 6.
housing as desired in the vision statement. Th ese
amenities may include forested areas, wetland
complexes, adjacency to parks and greenways.
Some of the City’s policy objectives require further
explanation.
Life Cycle Housing
Housing is not a simple “one size fi ts all” commodity.
Monticello’s housing stock varies by type, age, style
and price. Th e Community Context chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan describes the characteristics of
the housing stock based on the 2000 Census and recent
building permit trends.
Th e concept of life cycle housing recognizes that hous-
ing needs change over the course of a person’s life (see
Figure 3-4). Young adults may not have the income
capacity to own the typical single family home. Th is
Land Use | 3-72008 Comprehensive Plan
segment of the population often seeks rental housing.
Families move through diff erent sizes, styles and prices
of housing as family size and income changes over time.
With aging, people may desire smaller homes with less
maintenance. Eventually, the elderly transition to hous-
ing associated with options for direct care. As noted
in the Vision Statement, Monticello’s population will
continue to become more diverse. Th is diversity will
be seen in age, race, culture and wealth. Th ese factors
will infl uence the housing needs of Monticello.
Th e Comprehensive Plan recognizes these diff erences
and seeks to create a balanced housing supply that
encourages people to move to and stay in Monticello.
Th is balance may not be achieved solely by market
forces guided by this Land Use Plan. Actions by the
City may be needed to promote the creation of housing
in underserved segments of the market.
Neighborhood Design
A priority for the community is diversifi cation of the
housing stock by providing more “move up” housing.
In this context, the term “move up” housing refers to
larger homes with more amenities in structure and
setting. Th is type of housing may not be exclusively
single-family detached or low density. Attached forms
of housing with medium or high densities may meet the
objectives for move up housing in the appropriate loca-
tions. In this way, the objectives for move up housing
and life cycle housing are compatible and supportive.
While every community wants a high quality housing
stock, this issue has particular importance in Mon-
ticello. It is a key to retaining population. Without
a broader variety of housing options, families may
encouraged to leave Monticello to meet their need for
a larger home. It is a factor in economic development.
One facet of attracting and retaining professional jobs
is to provide desirable housing alternatives.
It must be recognized that creating move up housing
requires more than policies in the Comprehensive Plan.
Th e Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for achiev-
ing the desired results. Th e desired outcomes require
private investment. This investment occurs when
demand exists or the City can provide an incentive to
attract investment.
Figure 3-4: Life Cycle of Housing Supply
3-8 | Land Use City of Monticello
Part of attracting move up housing comes from cre-
ating great neighborhoods – places that will attract
and sustain the housing options sought by the City.
Neighborhoods are the building block of Places to Live
in Monticello. Th e goal of the Comprehensive Plan is
to create and maintain attractive, safe and functional
neighborhoods. Th e following policies help to achieve
this objective:
1. Neighborhoods should incorporate the natural
characteristics of the setting. Trees, terrain,
drainageways, and other natural features provide
character to neighborhoods.
2. Housing should be oriented to the local street,
minimizing access and noise confl icts with collec-
tor streets.
3. Th e City will use public improvements to enhance
the appearance and character of a neighborhood.
Some examples of improvements that defi ne an
area include streets with curb and gutter, trees in
the public boulevard, street lighting systems, and
storm water ponding.
4. Sidewalks, trails, and bikeways will connect the
neighborhood to other parts of the community.
5. Every neighborhood should have reasonable access
to a public park as a place for residents to gather
and play.
All of these elements work together to create a desirable
and sustainable place to live.
Balancing the Built and Natural Environments
Th e natural amenities of the growth areas (west and
south) in Monticello should serve as a catalyst for
residential development. Th e proposed regional park
(YMCA property) off ers the dual assets of natural fea-
tures and recreational opportunities. Lakes, wetlands
and other natural amenities exist throughout the or-
derly annexation area.
Studies have shown that parks and open space have a
positive economic eff ect on adjacent development. An
article published by the National Park and Recreation
Association states that “recent analyses suggest that
open spaces may have substantial positive impacts on
surrounding property values and hence, the property
tax base, providing open space advocates with con-
vincing arguments in favor of open space designation
and preservation.” Balancing the built and natural
environments should provide a catalyst to the types of
development desired by the City and in the expansion
of the property tax base.
In attempting to meet residential development objec-
tives, the City should not lose sight of long-term public
benefi t from access to these same natural areas. Th e
original development of Monticello provides an ex-
cellent illustration. Th e majority of the riverfront in
Monticello is controlled by private property. Public
access to the River comes at points provided by public
parks.
Figure 3-5: Relationship Between Development and
Natural Features - Parkway
Figure 3-6: Relationship Between Development and
Natural Features - Trail Corridor
Land Use | 3-92008 Comprehensive Plan
A well known example of balancing public use with
private development is the Minneapolis chain of lakes
and Minnehaha Creek. Public streets (parkways) and
trails separate neighborhoods from the natural features,
preserving public use and access. Th ese neighbor-
hoods are some of the most desirable in the region,
demonstrating that public use and private benefi t are
not mutually exclusive.
Th e fi gures below show two options for integrating
housing, natural features and public use. Figure 3-5
is the parkway concept. An attractive street forms the
edge between the park (or natural area) and the hous-
ing. A multi-use trail follows the street while homes
face the street and draw on the attractiveness of both
the parkway and the natural amenities.
Th e alternative is to use a trail corridor to provide public
access to these areas (see Figure 3-6). Th e trail follows
the edge of the natural area. Access to the trail between
lots should come at reasonable intervals.
Th ere are a variety of real world examples of how Min-
nesota cities have used conservation design strategies
to promote high quality development and preserve the
natural environment. Th e illustrations in Figure 3-7
shows elements of the Chevalle development in Chaska.
Using open space design and rural residential cluster
development techniques, HKGi’s concept plan provides
for a variety of housing options while preserving a ma-
jority of the area as permanent open space, including
public and common open spaces. Amenities would
include access to protected open spaces (lakeshore,
woods, meadows, pastures, wetlands), walking/biking
trails, equestrian trails and facilities, common outdoor
structures and an environmental learning center. Th e
experience of other cities and developments can guide
future planning and decision making in Monticello.
Figure 3-7: Example of Conservation Design Development
OPEN SPACE DESIGN
-Pastures
-Equestrian Facility
-Wetlands Enhancements
-Conservation Easements
-Central Park
-27 Acre Park South of Lake
NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD
Total Housing Units:66
Custom, Luxury Twin Homes
Lot Width:45’x 90’Twinhome
Lot Size:4,050 Sq. Ft.
House Sq. Ft.:2,800 to 3,800 Sq. Ft.
Price Point Packages:$475,000 to
$750,000
NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD
Total Housing Units:98
Semi-Custom, Single-Family Homes
Lot Width:82’Minimum
Lot Size:9,900 to 16,000 Sq. Ft.
House Sq. Ft.:2,400 to 4,800 Sq. Ft.
Price Point Packages:$450,000 to
$650,000
NEIGHBORHOOD FEATURES
-Central Park
-Northeast Neighborhood Green
-South Neighborhood Green
-Association Dock and Park
3-10 | Land Use City of Monticello
Attractive Places
Attractive physical appearance is one of the most
common attributes of Places to Live in Monticello.
Attractiveness is a combination of design, construc-
tion and maintenance. Th ese characteristics apply to
buildings and sites. Attractiveness is relevant for both
private and public property. Attractiveness refl ects
individual pride in property as well as an overall sense
of community quality.
Th e City may use a variety of regulatory tools to infl u-
ence the potential for attractive neighborhoods:
Building codes and additional regulations to pro-
mote quality construction.
Subdivision regulations control the initial confi gu-
ration of lots.
Zoning regulations establish limitations on the size
of lots, placement of the house on a lot, relationship
of structure size to lot area, and building height.
Nuisance ordinances enable the City to prevent and
correct undesirable uses of property.
Other City regulations control other ancillary uses
of residential property.
Maintenance of property is a factor in sustaining quality
neighborhoods. Th e tenure (form of ownership) infl u-
ences the responsibility for housing maintenance. Th e
owner-occupant of a single family detached home is
solely responsible for the maintenance of building and
grounds. If this same home is rented, maintenance
responsibilities are often shared between tenant and
owner. Th is relationship may include a third party
property manager retained by the owner to perform
maintenance duties. Owners of attached housing may
act collectively through a homeowner’s association.
In multiple family rental housing, the tenants have no
direct responsibility for property maintenance. Th is
discussion does not imply a preference, but is intended
solely to highlight the diff erences. Th is understanding
becomes relevant when public action is needed to ad-
dress a failure of the private maintenance approach.
Nuisance ordinances are one tool used by the City
to address failures in private maintenance and use of
property.
Economics also infl uences property maintenance. Th e
greater the portion of income devoted to basic housing
costs (mortgage/rent, taxes, utilities), the less money
available for maintenance activities. Maintenance
can be deferred, but not avoided. If left unchecked,
this cycle of avoided maintenance produces negative
eff ects.
Safe Places
Safety is frequently identified as the most desired
characteristic of Places to Live. Several aspects of the
Comprehensive Plan and city government infl uence
safe neighborhoods.
Th e City will encourage existing neighborhoods 1.
and develop new neighborhoods where people
are involved in the community, interact with their
neighbors and support each other.
Th e City will design, build and maintain a system 2.
of streets that collects traffi c from neighborhoods,
allows movement within Monticello to jobs, shop-
ping and other destinations and minimizes traffi c
that “cuts through” neighborhoods on local streets
seeking other destinations.
Th e City will provide, directly or by contract, ser-3.
vices needed to protect people and property.
Th e City will support the Land Use Plan with a 4.
water supply that provides clean water at pressures
needed to support fi re suppression.
The City will protect the natural environment 5.
by requiring new development to connect to the
sanitary sewer system and by adequately treating
all municipal wastewater.
Th e City will provide water that is safe to drink by 6.
protecting water supply sources.
Places to Work
Th is land use is primarily intended for industrial de-
velopment. Places to Work seeks to provide locations
for the retention, expansion and creation of businesses
that provide jobs for Monticello residents and expan-
sion and diversifi cation of the property tax base. In
order to be a center of employment with a wide range
of job opportunities, it is critical that Monticello
preserve suffi cient land for Places to Work over the
next twenty-fi ve years. Th ese land uses can be one of
Land Use | 3-112008 Comprehensive Plan
the most challenging to locate because of its need for
convenient transportation access and infl uence on
surrounding land uses. In planning for future Places to
Work, the Comprehensive Plan considers the goals of
the community; what type of industrial development
is sought; and what factors should be considered when
locating an industrial land use.
In planning for sustaining existing businesses and at-
tracting new development, it is necessary to understand
why Places to Work are important to Monticello. Th e
objectives for this land use include:
Expanding and diversifying the property tax base.
Providing jobs with an increasing opportunity for
people to work and live in Monticello.
Promoting wage levels that provide incomes need-
ed to purchase decent housing, support local busi-
nesses and support local government services.
Take advantage of opportunities to attract corpo-
rate headquarters/campuses and businesses that
specialize in biosciences and technology.
Encouraging the retention and expansion of exist-
ing businesses in Monticello.
Figure 3-8: Land Use Plan - Places to Work
3-12 | Land Use City of Monticello
Policies – Places to Work
Th e City will use the Comprehensive Plan to des-1.
ignate and preserve a supply of land for Places to
Work that meets current and future needs.
Consistent with the vision for the future of Mon-2.
ticello, the Land Use Plan promotes the establish-
ment of business campus settings that provide a
high level of amenities, including architectural
controls, landscaping, preservation of natural
features, storage enclosed within buildings, and
other features. Th e zoning ordinance, subdivision
regulations and other land use controls will also be
used to create and maintain the desired business
campus settings.
Places to Work supports the City’s desire to attract 3.
businesses oriented to bioscience, technology, re-
search and development, corporate headquarters,
business offi ce, wholesale showrooms, and related
uses.
The Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that 4.
Places to Work should provide locations for other
general industrial development in the areas of
manufacturing, processing, warehousing, distribu-
tion and related businesses.
Places to Work may include non-industrial busi-5.
nesses that provide necessary support to the un-
derlying development objectives of this land use.
Examples of supporting land uses include lodging,
offi ce supplies and repair services.
Figure 3-9: Land Use Plan - Places to Shop
Land Use | 3-132008 Comprehensive Plan
Additional public objectives and strategies for Places
to Work can be found in the Economic Development
chapter.
Places to Shop
Places to Shop designate locations that are or can be
developed with businesses involved with the sale of
goods and services. Places to Shop may include offi ces
for service businesses. Places to Shop guides land uses
that are both local and regional in nature.
Policies - Places to Shop
In guiding land uses for Places to Shop, the Compre-
hensive Plan seeks to:
1. Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks to attract and retain
businesses that provide goods and services needed
by Monticello residents.
2. Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks to capture the op-
portunity for commercial development that serves
a broader region. Places to Shop with a regional
orientation should be located where the traffi c does
not disadvantage travel within Monticello.
3. Commercial development will be used to expand
and diversify the local property tax base and as an
element of a diverse supply of local jobs.
4. Places to Shop will be located on property with ac-
cess to the street capacity needed to support traffi c
from these businesses.
5. Each parcel should supply an adequate supply of
parking that makes it convenient to obtain the
goods and services.
6. Building materials, facades and signage should
combine with public improvements to create an
attractive setting.
7. Site design must give consideration to defi ning edg-
es and providing buff ering or separation between
the commercial parcel and adjacent residential
uses.
Th ese policies help to create sustainable locations for
Places to Shop in a manner that enhances Monticello.
Downtown
Downtown is a unique commercial district that is part
of Monticello’s heritage and identity. It is, however, no
longer possible for downtown to be Monticello’s cen-
tral business district. Th e mass of current and future
commercial development south of Interstate 94 along
TH 25 and in east Monticello along interstate 94 have
replaced the downtown area as primary shopping dis-
tricts. Th e future success of downtown requires it to
be a place unlike any other in Monticello.
Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the vision
and objectives described in the 1997 Downtown and
Riverfront Plan. Downtown is intended to be a mix
of inter-related and mutually supportive land uses.
Businesses involved with the sale of goods and services
should be the focus of Downtown land use. Residential
development facilities reinvestment and places poten-
tial customers in the Downtown area. Civic uses draw
in people from across the community.
During the planning process, the potential for allowing
commercial activity to extend easterly out of the Down-
town along Broadway was discussed. Th e Compre-
hensive Plan consciously defi nes – as the eastern edge
of Downtown for two basic reasons: (1) Downtown
should be successful and sustainable before new areas
of competition are created; and (2) Th e Comprehensive
Plan seeks to maintain and enhance the integrity of
residential neighborhoods east of Downtown.
The Comprehensive Plan describes issues, plans and policies related to the Downtown in several sections
of the Plan.
3-14 | Land Use City of Monticello
More than any other land use category, Downtown has
strong connections to other parts of the Comprehen-
sive Plan. Th e following parts of the Comprehensive
Plan also address community desires and plans for the
Downtown area:
Th e Land Use chapter contains a specifi c focus
area on Downtown. Th e focus area contains a
more detailed discussion of the issues facing the
Downtown and potential public actions needed to
address these issues.
Th e operation of the street system is a critical fac-
tor for the future of Downtown. Th e Transporta-
tion chapter of the Comprehensive Plan (and the
related Transportation Plan) infl uence the ability
of residents to travel to Downtown and the options
for mitigating the impacts of traffi c on Highway 25
and other Downtown streets.
The Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
provides for parks in the Downtown and the trail
systems that allow people to reach Downtown on
foot or bicycle.
Th e Economic Development chapter lays the foun-
dation for public actions and investments that will
be needed to achieve the desired outcomes.
Policies – Downtown
Downtown is a special and unique part of Mon-1.
ticello. It merits particular attention in the Com-
prehensive Plan and in future eff orts to achieve
community plans and objectives.
Downtown is intended to be an inter-connected 2.
and supportive collection of land uses. Th e primary
function of Downtown is as a commercial district.
Other land uses should support and enhance the
overall objectives for Downtown.
Wherever possible, street fronts should be reserved 3.
for businesses.
Housing in the downtown can facilitate necessary 4.
redevelopment and bring potential customers di-
rectly into the area. Housing may be free-standing
or in shared buildings with street level commercial
uses.
Downtown is the civic center of Monticello. To 5.
the degree possible, unique public facilities (such
as the Community Center, the Library and the Post
Offi ce) should be located in the Downtown area as
a means to bring people into the Downtown.
Downtown should emphasize connections with 6.
the Mississippi River that are accessible by the
public.
Downtown should be a pedestrian-oriented place 7.
in a manner that cannot be matched by other com-
mercial districts.
Downtown should have an adequate supply of free 8.
parking for customers distributed throughout the
area.
The City will facilitate private investment in 9.
Downtown and, if necessary, use its redevelop-
ment powers to remove barriers to desired private
investment.
All of these policies work together to attract people to
Downtown and to enhance the potential for a successful
business environment.
Mixed Use
Th e Mixed Use is a transition area between the Down-
town and the hopsital campus. It has been createdin
recogonition of the unique nature of this area. Th e area
serves two functions. It is the edge between long-term
residential neighborhoods and a major tranportation
corridor (Broadway Street). It is also a link between
the Downtown, the hospital campus and the east in-
terchange retail area.
Th e primary goal of this land use is to preserve and
enhance housing in this part of Monticello. Any
non-residential development should be designed to
minimize the impacts on and confl icts with adjacent
neighborhoods.
Policies - Mixed Use.
Development should not have direct access to 1.
Broadway street. Access should come from side
street.
Non-residential development should be limited to 2.
small retail, service and offi ce businesses. Th e scale,
character and site design should be compatible with
the adjacent residential neighborhoods.
Land Use | 3-152008 Comprehensive Plan
All non-residential development will be oriented 3.
to Broadway Street and not to 3rd Street or River
Street.
Commercial development compatible with the 4.
Downtown should be encouraged to locate there.
More intense housing and commercial uses may be 5.
allowed if directly related to the hospital.
Places to Recreate
Places to Recreate consist of public parks and private
recreation facilities. Th e land uses are essential ele-
ments of the quality of life in Monticello. Th e Parks
and Trails chapter of the Comprehensive describes the
current park and trail system and the future plan to
maintain and enhance this system.
Th e Comprehensive Plan is only one aspect of manag-
ing the land use for public parks and private recreation
facilities. Th e City’s zoning regulations place these
locations into a zoning district. Often, the purpose of
the zoning district is to guide private development, such
as housing. Under current State Law, zoning regula-
tions “trump” the Land Use Plan and govern the use of
land. With the potential for the redevelopment of golf
courses, it is important the Comprehensive Plan and
other land use controls work in concert to achieve the
desired outcomes.
Th e City’s plans and policies for parks, trails and open
space can be found in the Parks chapter of the Com-
prehensive Plan
Places for Community
Places for Community consist of public and semi-public
land uses. Public uses include all governmental facili-
ties (city, county, state and federal) and schools. Th is
category also applies to churches, cemeteries, hospitals,
and other institutional uses.
It is important to note that these land uses relate only
to existing land uses. Th e Comprehensive Plan does
not guide the location of new churches, schools, public
buildings and other institutional land uses. Places for
Community will be needed in the Northwest area as
it develops.
Th ese uses are typically allowed in residential areas and
governed by zoning regulations. Th ese institutional
uses (such as schools and churches) are important parts
of the fabric of the community, but require guidance to
ensure a proper fi t with its residential surroundings.
New institutional use should be allowed in residential
areas under certain conditions. These conditions
should address the aspects of the use that confl ict with
desired characteristics of residential neighborhood.
Criteria for locating an institutional use in a residential
land use area include:
1. Size. Large buildings and site areas can disrupt
neighborhood cohesiveness. Use in lower density
residential areas should not be more than [to be
determined] square feet in lot area.
2. Parking. Parking may spill on to neighborhood
streets without adequate on-site facilities. Th e
parking needs will vary with the use of the facility.
Each facility should provide adequate on-site or
reasonable off -site shared parking based on the use
of the facility.
3. Traffi c. Institutional uses should be oriented to
designated collector or arterial streets.
4. Lighting and signage. Site lighting and signage
needs may resemble commercial uses. Th ese site
factors should be managed to fi t the character of
the surrounding residential development.
Urban Reserve
Th e Urban Reserve contains all property in the Orderly
Annexation Area that it not shown for development in
the near term in this Plan. Th e objective is to encourage
rural and agricultural uses, preventing barriers to future
development opportunities. It is anticipated that the
City will grow into portions of the Urban Reserve as
planned land use areas become fully developed and ca-
pacity for future growth in needed. Th e Urban Reserve
is not simply a holding area for future development.
Parts of the Urban Reserve are likely to be preserved
as natural resource areas or for agricultural purposes.
Future planning will consider the locations in the Urban
Reserve best suited for development.
3-16 | Land Use City of Monticello
Interchange Planning Area
Th e Interchange Planning Area encompasses undevel-
oped land in the northwest part of Monticello around
the site of a potential west interchange with Interstate
94. Th e purpose of this land use is to preserve the area
for future development and prevent the creation of
development barriers.
If built, the area should be planned to support a mix-
ture of commercial, employment and residential land
uses. Th e interchange location and the routes of future
connecting roads are solely for illustration. Future land
use issues in this area are discussed in the Focus Area
for Northwest Monticello.
Private Infrastructure
Th is category applies to Xcel Energy’s power plant and
railroad right-of-way. Th is category recognizes the
unique role of the power plant in Monticello.
Greenway
Th e Land Use Plan Map shows a “potential greenway”
ringing the western and southern edges of Monticello.
Th e Greenway is intended to provide an environmental
corridor that connects large community parks and open
spaces to neighborhoods, schools, shopping areas and
places to work. Th ey serve to protect environmentally
sensitive areas such as natural habitat, wetlands, tree
canopy, and drainage ways. Land within this corridor
could be comprised of a combination of public and pri-
vate open space. Development would not be prohibited
within the greenway but would be reasonably restricted
to ensure that development is carefully integrated with
the natural environment.
Th e Greenway is intended to shape development pat-
terns in a manner that is sensitive to the existing en-
vironment and harmonious with the landscape. Th e
Greenway creates opportunities for a continuous trail
corridor connecting neighborhoods with large parks
and open spaces. A trail within this corridor is intended
to be fully accessible to the general public.
Th e following are the City’s goals for the Greenway:
To provide (where possible) a continuous green 1.
corridor connecting large community parks and
open spaces to neighborhoods, shopping areas,
schools and places to work.
To connect people to signifi cant places.2.
To protect the community’s natural resources 3.
(trees, ponds, wetlands, slopes, etc).
To create environmentally sensitive development 4.
and design.
To provide opportunities for corridors for wildlife 5.
movement and ecological connections between
natural areas.
Focus Areas
For certain parts of Monticello, the intentions of the
Comprehensive Plan cannot be adequately described
solely with the land use map and the related category
descriptions. Th e following Focus Areas provide a more
detailed examination of the plans and issues in key loca-
tions that will shape the future of Monticello.
Northwest Monticello
Th is focus area includes the entire northwest corner
of the community. Th e land use objectives in this area
include:
Encourage development in this part of the com-1.
munity to utilize infrastructure investments and
to provide the capacity to develop in high amenity
areas.
Provide for a variety of housing alternatives based 2.
on the natural features and the surrounding land
uses. Areas with high natural amenities or proxim-
ity to the planned regional park should be reserved
for move up housing.
Expansion of existing Places to Work in a manner 3.
that creates more “head of household” jobs.
Preserve and promote public use of natural areas, 4.
including the establishment of greenway corri-
dors.
Identify and preserve key street corridors.5.
Preserve areas for future Places to Shop and Places 6.
to Work around a future highway interchange, if
such an interchange proves viable.
Land Use | 3-172008 Comprehensive Plan
11
9
4
75
39
Figure 3-10: Land Use Plan - Northwest Monticello
25. Without the bridge, the primary benefi t is to pro-
vide access to this area and expand the development
opportunities.
Th e Land Use Plan assumes that the interchange is a
future possibility. For this reason, property adjacent
to the interstate has been placed into a combination
of Places to Live, Work and Shop. Th e Plan seeks to
prevent development from limiting the location of
the interchange (or block it) and to preserve the area
around the interchange for future commercial, indus-
trial and residential development. Without the access
provided by the interchange, commercial, industrial
and residential development should not be anticipated
in this area.
Ideally, the City will pursue additional investigations
following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan.
Th ese investigations should be designed to resolve some
of the unanswered questions related to the interchange.
Th ese questions include:
Where should the interchange be located?
What is the potential for a new river bridge con-
nection?
How would the interchange be funded and what
are the fi nancial and land use implications for the
City?
What time frame should be used in planning for
the improvements?
Th e answers to these questions provide invaluable guid-
ance to future land use and transportation in Monti-
cello. Th e area included in future planning should not
be limited to the property in the Interchange Planning
Area land use category. An interchange and the sup-
porting street system has future land use implications
for a broader area.
Regional Park
Another critical factor in the future of the Northwest
Area is the future of the YMCA camp. Th e City and
Wright County are in negotiations with the Minneapo-
lis YMCA to acquire the 1,200-acre Camp Manitou.
Th e Comprehensive Plan anticipates that the Camp
will be converted into a regional park.
Th e Comprehensive Plan envisions that growth will ex-
tend westward from existing development. Th e initial
high amenity residential development is expected to
occur along the eastern perimeter of the new regional
park (YMCA Camp Manitou). No Places to Live are
planned with the boundaries of this park. Future
development will be infl uenced by the capacity of the
street system, including plans for the construction of
a highway interchange.
Th e remainder of this section describes the land use
issues and objectives for northwest Monticello in
greater detail.
West Interchange
A new interchange with Interstate 94 is a critical vari-
able in the future development of this area. While
the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the potential for
a future interchange, in 2008 it is only a concept. It is
not part of the State’s plans for future highway improve-
ments for this district.
Th is interchange could be a valuable part of the long-
term transportation plan for Monticello if it is part of
a new river crossing that removes traffi c from Highway
3-18 | Land Use City of Monticello
Th e area around this park is guided for future Places
to Live. No residential development should be al-
lowed within the park. Th e amenity of this land and
the regional park provide an excellent setting (around
the perimeter of the park) for some of the “upscale”
neighborhoods and housing desired by the City.
In planning for this park, it is important to look be-
yond the boundaries of the park and to its context in
the broader community. Th e illustration in Figure
3-11 highlights several key community development
opportunities:
Th e City must create connections between the park
and other sections of Monticello.
Building streets in a “parkway” design emphasizes
the desired qualities of a regional park and of the
surrounding Places to Live and Work.
Th e park is a critical piece in creating a “greenway”
system that links to the Mississippi River and may,
over time, ring the community.
Industrial Growth
Th e Northwest area is a critical location for current and
future industrial development. Th e Monticello Busi-
ness Center, located south of Chelsea Road and west
of 90th Street, has already started to be developed as a
high amenity environment with protective covenants
that address building materials, loading docks, outdoor
storage, and landscaping. In order to provide suffi cient
land for Business Campus uses over the next 25 years,
YMCA
Regional
Park
Existing
Natural
Land
Existing
Natural
Land
Potential Parkways
Potential
Greenway
Corridor
Potential
Greenway
Corridor
Existing
Green
Corridor
To Mississippi River
To Mississippi River
25
39
Z94
Figure 3-11: Community Connections to Regional Park
Land Use | 3-192008 Comprehensive Plan
the Comprehensive Plan extends this land use south to
the planned expansion of School Boulevard.
It is important to recognize that activity generated by
business development can create confl icts with resi-
dential development. Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks
to create both high quality business parks and residen-
tial neighborhoods in this area. Careful site planning
and development management will be needed to meet
these objectives.
School Boulevard Extension
Th e Northwest Area serves as a good example of the
need to coordination land use and transportation plan-
ning. An extension of School Boulevard is needed to
provide access to the area and to connect development
to the rest of the community. Th e route of this roadway
should be identifi ed and preserved as development
occurs.
School Boulevard has several other Comprehensive
Plan implications:
Th is major collector street will infl uence the nature
of adjacent land use.
Streetscape improvements would help to defi ne
the high quality character desired by the City as a
gateway to the regional park and to new neighbor-
hoods.
Th e street is a means for bringing trail connections
to the park.
Golf Course
In 2006, the Silver Springs Golf Course was part of a
development proposal (Jeff erson at Monticello) that
would have redeveloped this property mixing golf and
housing. Th e development did not proceed beyond the
environmental review.
Th e Comprehensive Plan shows the area as Places to
Recreate based on the continued use as a golf course.
Th is designation does not preclude a future proposal
and Comprehensive Plan amendment for residential
development. It is likely, however, that this scale of new
development will require the access provided by a new
highway interchange. Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks to
fi ll in other development areas and make eff ective use
of other infrastructure investments before extending
utilities for redevelopment of the golf course.
Downtown Focus Area
Downtown Monticello needs special attention in the
Comprehensive Plan. Following the last Comprehen-
sive Plan update, the community undertook a separate
downtown planning process. Th is process resulted in
the 1997 Downtown and Riverfront Plan. Th is Plan
emphasizes the importance that the community places
on Downtown. Th e 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
continues to rely on the 1997 Downtown and Riverfront
Plan as a guide for public and private actions in the
Downtown area.
Th e 1997 Plan shows that a vision and a plan are not
enough to create the type of Downtown desired by
the community. While some actions have occurred
pursuant to the 1997 Plan, much of its vision remains
unfulfi lled. Th e Comprehensive Plan will not, however,
create any actions that will immediately transform
the Downtown environment and achieve community
objectives. Revitalizing and sustaining Downtown
Monticello requires a collaborative eff ort of the City,
businesses, property owners and other stakeholders.
Planning for the future of the Downtown must recog-
The Comprehensive Plan seeks to enhance the existing commercial core along Broadway by building
strong connections with the riverfront and the civic/retail district on the south end of Walnut Street.
3-20 | Land Use City of Monticello
The 1997 Downtown Plan envisioned land use in eleven districts, each with varying targets for use and
character:
Riverfront - Specialty retail, eating establishments, lodging, entertainment, multifamily residential,
offi ce; upper level residential or offi ce; two or three story buildings; river orientation; emphasis on
public areas surrounding buildings (rather than parking lots).
Broadway: Downtown - Small and mid-sized retail, specialty retail, personal and business services,
eating establishments, lodging, entertainment and offi ce; upper level residential or offi ce; two story
buildings; orientation to Broadway.
Broadway: East and West - Singe family residential, strong emphasis on restoration of existing older
homes.
Walnut - Small and mid-sized retail, personal and business services, eating establishments and offi ce,
upper level residential or offi ce; two story buildings encouraged; orientation to Walnut Street.
Pine - Mid-sized retail and offi ce; two story buildings encouraged; orientation to Pine Street.
Seventh Street - Larger scale retail and service, auto-oriented retail and service, drive through
restaurants, lodging; orientation of Seventh Street.
Transitional - Mix of small offi ce, personal and business services, multi-family residential and single
family homes.
Neighborhood – Predominantly single family horns following existing neighborhood patterns.
Industrial – Cargill Kitchen Solutions operations only; transition to Civic/Institutional, Walnut or
Transitional if Cargill Kitchen Solutions ceases operation.
Parks and Open Space – Parks, cemeteries, outdoor public spaces and gathering spaces. Civic/
Institutional - Municipal and county facilities (except maintenance operations), public meeting spaces,
community activity spaces, educational facilities, churches, outdoor gathering spaces.
Civic/institutional - Municipal and county facilities (except maintenance operations), public meeting
spaces, community activity spaces. educational facilities, churches, outdoor gathering spaces.
Figure 3-12: 1997 Downtown Plan - Land Use
Land Use | 3-212008 Comprehensive Plan
a “bridge” between the traditional downtown/
riverfront and the highway oriented commercial
uses to the south.
Some actions have taken place in accordance with the
1997 Plan. Th e Community Center complex stayed
in Downtown and anchors the south end of Walnut
Street. Combined with the Library, the area has civic
destination that attract people from all areas of the
community. Th e commercial development east of the
Community Center shows how new buildings can bring
storefronts to the street.
Th ere are also examples of missed opportunities. Th e
old library was replaced with a bank. Th is site seeks
visibility from Highway 25. Th e parking lot and not the
building is oriented to Walnut Street. Such sites cre-
ate gaps and impair the ability to connect the existing
Downtown core with the south end.
Downtown Strategies
Given current plans and conditions, the Comprehen-
sive Plan recommends the following strategies for
Downtown.
1. Th e Downtown land use area should be an area
running from the River to 7th Street. It is bound on
the east by Cedar Street and on the west by Locust
Street.
2. Land use in the Downtown should be a mix of retail,
service, offi ce, civic and residential development.
Although an industrial land use, Cargill Kitchen
Solutions is an important and ongoing part of
Downtown. Change in land use should only occur
if Cargill Kitchen Solutions decides to leave this
location. At such time, it would be desired not to
perpetuate industrial use at this location.
3. With continued traffic along Highway 25, it is
essential to work to establish a strong link along
Walnut Street between the Community Center,
businesses on Broadway and the River. Th e objec-
tive is to establish strong connections between all of
the factors that attract people to the Downtown.
4. To help move towards the creation of a new “main
street” all new development on Walnut Street
should have storefronts oriented to Walnut Street.
The current end of Walnut Street is a barrier to improving connections between Downtown and the
riverfront.
nize the practical realities facing commercial develop-
ment in Downtown:
Th e confi guration and traffi c volumes of Highway
25 signifi cantly reduce opportunities for direct ac-
cess from the Highway to adjacent properties.
Traffi c volumes on Highway 25 will continue to
increase. Greater volumes and congestion act as an
impediment for people living south of I-94 coming
to Downtown.
Th ere is no controlled intersection on Highway
25 between Broadway and 7th Street. Th e lack
of a controlled intersection combined with traffi c
volumes make pedestrian connections between
Downtown and residential areas to the east very
diffi cult.
“Big box” and retail development continue to oc-
cur in other parts of Monticello. Th ese businesses
directly compete with the Downtown and attract
smaller businesses (that might otherwise consider
a Downtown location) to adjacent parcels.
Th ese challenges infl uenced the recommendations
in the 1997 Downtown Plan. Neither Broadway
Street nor Highway 25 can serve as an eff ective
“main street” or Downtown focal point for Mon-
ticello. For this reason, the Plan recommended
fl ipping the orientation of future development to
Walnut Street. Walnut had the capacity to create
more the qualities found on a downtown main
street. More importantly, Walnut Street provides
3-22 | Land Use City of Monticello
Th is development may be single story commercial
or multi-level mixed use.
5. Orienting storefronts to Walnut Street is only one
element of making the street more attractive for
pedestrians. Th e City should also explore other
ways to improve the pedestrian and bicycle experi-
ence along Walnut Street.
6. It is essential not to allow Walnut Street to become
a bypass route for Highway 25. As congestion
increases on Highway 25, there is an impetus to
seek other routes. Walnut Street is an attractive
cut-through option. Th e orientation of buildings,
on-street parking, boulevard trees, and curb “bump
outs” are examples of means to calm traffi c and
discourage cut-through movements.
7. Housing is intended to supplement and support,
but not replace, commercial development in the
Downtown. All housing in the Downtown area
(as identifi ed in the Comprehensive Plan) should
be multiple family housing. Land is a limited
commodity in the Downtown and should not be
consumed by single-story housing. Housing should
only be allowed above street level on Broadway and
Walnut Street. Housing should be encouraged on
the edges of the Downtown, in locations needing
redevelopment and not viable for commercial
uses.
8. Th e Downtown benefi ts from strong connections
with adjacent neighborhoods. Th ese neighbor-
hoods provide an important customer base for
Downtown businesses. A vibrant Downtown en-
hances these areas as places to live. Improved pe-
destrian connections, particularly across Highway
25, are needed to strengthen and maintain these
connections. Existing crossing points Broadway
and 7th Street should be enhanced.
9. Downtown would benefi t from stronger connec-
tions with the riverfront. Downtown is one of the
few locations in Monticello that allows meaning-
ful public access to the Mississippi River. Th is
asset should be enhanced as a means of attracting
people to Downtown. West Bridge Park lies in the
Downtown area, but does not feel like an active
part of Downtown. One possible improvement
is a connection with Walnut Street. Currently,
Walnut Street terminates south of River Street and
is separated by a grade change. Th e potential for
trail and/or street connection should be evaluated.
Community events and activities in West Bridge
Park also build the connection between the com-
munity, Downtown and the River.
10. Access to the Downtown would be improved by
making trail and/or bike lane improvements along
River Street to provide another means of reaching
Downtown and take advantage of the controlled
intersection with Highway 25.
South Central Focus Area
Continued residential growth to the south is an impor-
tant element of the Comprehensive Plan. Th is growth
achieves several objectives:
It helps to facilitate the expansion of the sanitary
sewer system in conjunction with the reconstruc-
tion of Fallon Avenue. Th is sanitary sewer capacity
is needed to support future industrial growth area
along Highway 25.
Th ese areas encourage growth in areas that could
use the new eastern interchange with I-94 rather
than Highway 25.
Th ese areas provide appropriate locations for con-
tinued growth in entry-level single family homes
and medium density housing types. Th ese Places
to Live are important elements of maintaining an
adequately diverse housing stock.
Orderly expansion to the south moves development
towards area of higher natural amenity. Areas along
the southern edge of the Orderly Annexation Area
provide another location for potential “move up”
housing.
117
37
Figure 3-13: Land Use Plan - South Central
Land Use | 3-232008 Comprehensive Plan
A key to development in this focus area is the construc-
tion of the Fallon Avenue bridge. Th e bridge leads to
the reconstruction of Fallon Avenue and the related ex-
pansion of municipal sanitary sewer and water systems.
Future development will be limited without additional
utility capacity.
East Focus Area
Th e Comprehensive Plan places greater priority on
growth to the west and south. Development should
be directed to areas that most eff ectively achieve the
objectives of this Plan.
Several factors could cause the City to encourage future
residential development in the East Focus Area:
Increased overall housing demand that exceeds the
capacity to support growth in other areas.
Traffi c congestion on Highway 25 that increases the
need to channel use to the east interchange.
Th e need to solve stormwater and drainage man-
agement issues (Ditch 33) in this area. Solving
drainage issues allows eastward expansion along
County Road 18.
Future growth in the east should continue to fi ll in the
development area within the Orderly Annexation Area
on the east side of Monticello. Th e natural features in
these areas allow for higher amenity neighborhoods.
This growth can occur with new collector/arterial
street corridors.
Figure 3-14: Land Use Plan - East Focus Area
18
CityCouncilWorkshopAgenda:6/13/11
4.Workshop–GoalSettingPresentation (JO)
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND
Inconjunctionwithpreparationofthe2012budget,staffhaspreparedalistofprojects
organizedbydepartmentthatwehavecategorizedonapreliminarybasisas“Mandatory”
or“Optional”.Mandatoryprojectsforthemostpartareprojectsthatarealready
underway,requiredbyFederalorStatemandate,orneedtobeaddressedinorderto
maintaincurrentservicelevels.However,anumberoftheprojectsidentifiedas
mandatorycanbedelayedoreliminatedifsodesiredbyCouncil.Sufficetosay,that
staffwillbebudgetingaroundaccomplishmentofitemsthatultimatelyareidentifiedby
theCityCouncilasmandatory.Alsolistedareprojectsthatareconsidered“Optional”.
TheseareprojectsthatarediscretionarythatCouncilmaywishtoaccomplishin2012or
upcomingyears.Someoftheseprojectsareactuallycostsavingsprojects,butcould
requireaninvestmentinordertogainthesavings.
Itismyhopetoreviewthelistingatarelativelyfastpacewithstaffassistancewhile
takingquestionsfromtheCityCouncil.Thankyoufortakingalookatthelistinadvance
andfortakingsomenotesonyourideasifyougetthetime.Attheendofthemeeting,or
viafollow-uptobedetermined,Councilisaskedtoprovidefeedbackonthelistby
answeringthefollowingquestions:
Aretherecommunityimprovementideasorprojectsthathavebeenmissed?Can
youthinkofothers?
Havetheprojectsbeencategorizedcorrectly?Whichitemsshouldmovefrom
themandatorycategorytotheoptionalcategoryandviceversa?
Athirdcategorycalled“Forgetaboutit”iscurrentlyempty.Councilisaskedto
tellstaffwhichprojectsshouldberemovedentirely.
Insum,overthepastfewyearsCouncilandstaffhaveworkedhardtodevelopan
organizationthatprovidesacceptableservicelevelsasefficientlyaspossible.Staffis
interestedincontinuingtotakeonnewprojectsthatmakeMonticelloabetterplace;
howeverourcapacitytodosoislimited.Itisthereforeimportanttoidentifythose
projectsandactivitieswhereCouncilbelievesareresourcesarebestdirected.Thankyou
forleadershipandassistanceinthisimportanteffort!
Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestionspriortotheworkshop,pleasegivemeacall!
B.SUPPORTINGDATA:
GoalSettingPowerPointPresentation
2012Pre-budgetWorkshop
•PurposeorGoalsforWorkshop–Setdirectionfor2012process
–IdentificationofProjectsorinitiativesthatinclude:
•Projectsinprocess–2011-2012
•Futureprojectsidentifiedpreliminarilyas“Mandatory”or“Optional”
•ObtainfeedbackfromCityCouncilonprojectideasandpriorities
•Feedbackprovidewillprovideabasisforfirstdraftofbudget
•History
–2011BudgetRecap
–2012BudgetTrends–RevenueandExpenses
–Auditpreliminaryfindings
–2012Outlook
•Reserves,FNMdelay,other
•ManyprojectscrossDepartmentalboundariesbutarelistedonlyonceforbrevity.
Administration-Mandatory
•Improvecommunicationefficiencythrough
useofcommunicationtechnologies
•EnhanceITCoordination
•Cellphoneusageandreimbursementpolicy
•Studyofreinstatementofstepincreasein
2012
•BeyondYellowRibbonCommittee
Organization
Administration-Optional
•WorkwithBigLakeinidentifyingopportunities
forcostsharing
•DevelopinternalITcommittee
•ImplementLaserFicherecordssystem
•Codificationandupdatingofgeneralordinances
•UpdateAnimalControlagreementswithother
cities
•DevelopsecuritysystemforCityproperties
•Studypotentialfor2nd LiquorStoreSite
Engineering-Mandatory
•CentralizingEngineeringData–FromWSB
•OngoingGIStrainingandworkintegrations
•GrantFundAcquisition–ISTEA/Other
•GISProjectupdate–CityCouncil
•GISAccess–Public
•ContinueLightingProjects–7th streetand
beyond
•Updatestormwaterpollutionpreventionplan
•Updatewaterresourcemanagementplan
Engineering-Mandatory
•Administerin-housepavementmanagementprogram
•Updatedesignmanualandconstructionstandards
•Developandimplementstormwaterpondmaintenanceprogram
•Establishmentofphosphorusandloadingcharges
•Completerightofwayordinance
•Completeupdatestoimprovementassessmentpolicies
Transportation-Mandatory
•WestSeventhStreetConnectionbetweenMinnesotaandElm
•FallonAvenueAlignmentStudyandConstructionDesign
•IdentifylocationofI94Interchangewest
•2012reconstructionproject
•Identifypreferredlocationof2nd RiverCrossing
•CompleteWalnutand7th Streetintersectionimprovementsand2011Streetreconstruction
•TrafficSignretroreflectivityproject–Federalmandate
•MarvinRoadDrainageImprovements
•TH25/CSAH75Intersectionbuild-out
•TH25/7th StreetIntersectionimprovements
Transportation-Optional
•PedestrianXwalkimprovementsalongBroadwayand
throughoutCity,especiallyhightrafficareas
•Grantapplicationforpathwaydevelopmentthrough
Xcelproperty
•Installtrafficsignalsystembatteryback-upsystem
•Improvepedestriancrossingdesigninhightrafficareas
•Feasibilitystudyfornorthfrontageroad
•Development/restartoftransportationcoalition–
Monticello/BigLake
Engineering–Optional
•BridgeParkpathwayandpedestrian
underpasslighting.
•DesignandconstructHighway25stormwater
pondliftstation
•DevelopmentofGEOCOPIAsystem
•UpdateStreetReconstructionProgram
Fiber-Mandatory
•Updatebudgetandbusinessplan
•ApartmentUnitagreements/connectivity
•AdministrationofUniversalServiceFund
•Achievemaximumsubscriptionrate
•GeneralManagerAssimilation
•RenegotiateHBCContract
•Ordinanceamendmentrequiringinstallationofconduitthroughsubdivisions
•Ordinanceestablishingstandardsfornewwiringinbuildings
Fiber-Mandatory
•EstablishplanforutilizationofPrairieConferenceCenter
•DevelopmentofconferencingcapabilitiesattheMonticelloCommunityCenter
•Telecommunicationsorganization/MACTAparticipation
•Promotelocaloriginationprogramming,localoriginalprogramsbenefittingFNMusers.
–Friendshipinmotion
–Faithchannel
Fiber-Optional
•ParticipationinMunicipalSupportGroup
•DevelopmentofStudentMentorprogramtoassisttechnologychallenged
•EstablishkeygeographicwebcamlocationsfordisplayonFNMVideo
•Developconferencingcapabilitiesforcityandareabusinessuse.
•Developmentofideasforusingfiberopticresourcestoimproveefficienciesorservicelevelstopublic
•UseofFiber/videotechnologytoassistwithsecurity/investigationsconductedbyWrightCountySheriff
MCC-Mandatory
•Natatorium,Mechanicalandexteriorwall
improvements
•Programactivitiesandeventdevelopment–
FriendshipIslandetc
•Improvedmarket/communicationprograms
recognizinghowcustomerslookfororwant
information
MCC-Optional
•WorkwithSchoolDistrict(Community
Education)andAthleticAssociationsin
consolidatingrecreationservices
•Developmentofriverrecreationservice
•SplashParkdevelopment
Finance-Mandatory
•FollowonsuggestionsinAudit
•ImplementationofGASB54
•Budgetprocesstoincludereviewofeach
departmentbudget
•DevelopmethodforfundingStormWater
MaintenanceCosts
•AccountingandreportingsupportforFNM
•RFPprocessexecutedforidentifyinginsurance
agents`
Finance-Optional
•Completefinancialplanning/policydocument
•Incorporatemeasuresofservice/$inbudget
process
•ImprovereportingtoCouncilandStaff
Personnel-Optional
•EvaluateITserviceprovisionincluding
combiningFNM/CityHall
•Prepareacomprehensivetrainingeducation
program
•ImplementWellnessprogramin2012
Personnel-Mandatory
•AssistCityCouncilindefiningresponsibilities
ofPersonnelCommittee
•Identifyresponsibilityforemergencyplanning
andmanagement
•Adoptnewhandbookandupdateassociated
ordinance.
Parks-Mandatory
•CompleteparkmaintenancemanualwithParksCommission
•Constructbracingfordug-outs(mandated)
•Buildsprayerbarfortacktrailer
•BuildcontainmentforAGlimepileatballfields(mandated)
•Constructroofon2nd garbagecontainment
•Plum-inelectricityatFreewayFieldparkshelter(pending)
•BertramChainofLakeseventsplanningandstaffing
•TurfProgramimplementation
•Implementboulevardtreeplantingplan
•ConductSpringTreeSaleprogram
•Increaseshadetreeinspections
Parks-Optional
•ResponsetoMonticelloSoccerClubrequestforfields
•Establishmentoflowmaintenancegrasseswhere
appropriate
•ConstructshelteratHillcrestparkwherelargeshade
treeoncestood
•Removebuckthorn,burn-offMontiClubHillproperty
•Developwoodshopatfarm
•Completedugoutimprovementsatfreewayfields
•Build20benchframes
Parks-Optional
•Buildstationsforportablerestroominparks
•EastBridge/EastRiverStreetlandscapingproject
•Startnightlacrosseleagueat4th streetpark.
•Update4th streetballfieldswithhelpfrom
baseballassociation
•MeadowOaksPathwaylightingproject
•WestBridge/EastBridgepathwaylightingproject
•OtterCreek–westpathwaylightingproject
Parks-Optional
•ProvideaccesstoBrownsIslandfromEast
BridgePark
•WorkwithRotaryClubindevelopmentof
frisbeegolfcourseatMontiHillPark
PublicWorks(WW)-Mandatory
•PrepareforMPDESpermitlevelChangevia:
–PhosphorusRemovalPlanning(mandated)
–Biosolidsthickeningupgradesincorporating
belt/filterpressengineering/screwpresspilottest
–Resultinginabilitytolandfill
•Monitorbrayphosphoruslevelandcontrolon
biofield
PublicWorks(water)-Mandatory
•CompletestudiesviaSourceWaterGrant
Project
•Re-StartWell-headProtectionCommittee
•IdentifyandDedicatelocationforanewwell
PublicWorks(Facilities)-Mandatory
•GPSinventoryofallsigns
•GPSinventoryofsewersystem,manholes,wyes,clean-outs
•Replaceagedequipmentasneeded
•Completeoverlayofruralroads
•Continueimprovedthistlemanagementandrightofwaymowing
•Maintainstormwaterpondmaintenanceschedule
•UpgradeScadasystem/camerasandsecturing
PublicWorks-Optional
•Studypotentialforextensionofgarbagepick-up
tocommercialproperties
•EstablishLeaseagreementsallowingantennason
Cityfacilities
•Purchasesignmakingequipmentifcostsavings
justifytheinvestment
•Inventorystreetlightsandcompareagainstbill
•GPSalltreesinboulevards,parkandlayerinto
GIS
EconomicDevelopment-Mandatory
•CompleteDowntownRedevelopmentPlanningprocess
•UtilizenewTIFjobsbillinfacilitatingcatalystprojects
downtown
•ConciergeTeamdevelopmentandutilization
•BRE–Administrator/MayorVisitstobusinessleaders
•Developtraining/educationcourseinconjunctionwith
WorkforceCenterandCommunityCollege
•FacilitateDevelopmentofMYSAFieldandOrganization
Headquarters
EconomicDevelopment-Mandatory
•InitiateefforttoupgradeMonticelloelectric
powersupply
•Continuetopursuehighendindustrialpark–
Hway25,Speich,Northwest?
•PursuesaleofJeffersonCommonsProperty
EconomicDevelopment-Optional
•Workwithdeveloperstocreateahigherend
housingstockforlocalcompanyCEO’s
•WorkwithSchoolDistrict/WorkforceCenterto
strengthenH.S.connectionstoindustries
•MarketMontiHilltoHighEnduses
Planning-Mandatory
•NWCorridorCompPlan/Interchangelocation
•ComprehensivePlanAmendmentforDowntownandCorrespondingZOforCCDDistrict
•UpdatetheSubdivisionOrdinance
•AmendmenttoFloodplain,Wild&ScenicandShorelandregulations.
•PUDandPZOverlayWorkshopswithCouncil/PlanningCommission
•PursueBertramGrantfundsandBondingBillinclusion
•SteerBertramChainofLakesMasterPlanPublicInputproecss
•MonitorInterimtemporarysignordinance
Planning-Optional
•Developmentandimplementationof
downtownsignsystem
•SupportofChamberofCommerce–Swan
Habitatandhostingeffort
•ImplementationofNaturalResourceInventory
OutcomesandObjectives
•WorkwithEngineeringandWrightCountySoil&
WatertodevelopaplanforpublicROWalongriver
CodeEnforcement-Mandatory
•Maintaingreatreputationforprovidingfast,accurate
andefficientservicetopublic,especiallycommercial
•Maintainblight,codeenforcementactivities
•Maintainrentalcodeenforcement
•Provideplanreviewandinspectionservices
•Clearinghouseofinformationonallneighborhood
blight,buildingandzoningrelatedquestions
•UpdateBuildingDepartmentCommunicationsthrough
useofnarrow-bandradios
CodeEnforcement-Optional
•Identifyallnon-conformingusesoritemsunder
Citycontrol
•Conductinventoryofnon-conforminglights
•InventoryCUPpropertiesfortracking
•Developgreasetrapinspectionprocess
•Continueaggressivetreatmentofthistleproblem
•Monitorcompliancewithundergroundtank
standards.
PublicSafety-Mandatory
•Identifystaffpersonresponsibleforemergencyresponseplanningandcoordination
•EvaluateneedforfulltimeFireChief
•Identifynewfirehalllocation
•Provideemergencyresponse/comprehensiveNIMStrainingforstaff
•Preparedisasterresponseplan
•Identifydisasterrelocationfacility
•Purchase800Mghzradiosviaradiologicalplanningfund
Communications–Mandatory
•ImprovedutilizationofE-governmentwebvia
onlineapplications,fillableformsetc
•ContinuationofGreenSheetupdates
•Continuedunificationofcommunication
mediums–Facebook,Website,citizenservice
desk,Newsletter,other
Communications-Optional
•UtilizationofFiberNetforbroadcasting
Communitynews
•Initiateneighborhoodmeetings
AGENDA
REGULARMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL
Monday,June13,2011–7p.m.
Mayor:ClintHerbst
CouncilMembers:LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta,BrianStumpf
1.CalltoOrderandPledgeofAllegiance
2A.ApprovalofMinutes–May23,2011Park&TrailPlanWorkshop
2B.ApprovalofMinutes–May23,2011RegularMeeting
3.Considerationofaddingitemstotheagenda
4.Citizencomments,publicserviceannouncements,andstaffupdates
a.CitizenComments:
b.PublicServiceAnnouncements:
1)BertramFamilyFunDaywrap-up
2)MovieinthePark(6/17)
3)Walk&Roll(6/18)
4)Riverfest(7/7-10)
c.StaffUpdates:
1)Mn/DOT25/11/14IntersectionImprovementsprojectupdate
5.ConsentAgenda:
A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforJune13th
B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments
C.Considerationofacceptingquotesandawardingcontractforthe2011Street
BituminousSealcoatProject
D.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-45callingforaPublicHearingfor
considerationofvacationofdrainageandutilityeasementsaspetitionedbythe
landownersofOutlotA,MonticelloBusinessCenter5thAddition;Applicant:
QuadDevelopment,LLC
E.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-47approvingtheMonticello
BusinessCenter6th AdditionFinalPlat,approvingtheMonticelloBusiness
SPECIALMEETING
5:00p.m.–SilverSpringsConceptPlanWorkshop
5:30p.m.–GoalSettingWorkshop
Center6th AdditionDevelopmentAgreementandreestablishingdrainageand
utilityeasements;Applicant:QuadDevelopment,LLC
F.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution2011-50acceptingquotesandawarding
contractforcompletingthesecondCommon-UseDumpsterEnclosureinthe
Block35MunicipalParkingLot,CityProjectNo.10C008
G.ConsiderationofapprovingwaiveroftheBuildingPlanCheckFeeforDLLK
Properties,LLCinaccordancewiththeBusinessExpansionIncentivePilot
program
H.ConsiderationofapprovingFinalStagePlannedUnitDevelopmentforLandmark
Center
6.Considerationofitemsremovedfromtheconsentagendafordiscussion
7.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-49acceptingbidsandawardingcontractfor
2011StreetReconstruction,CityProjectNo.11C001
8.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-51acceptingproposalandawardinga
contractfor2011StreetLightingImprovementsfor7th StreetEast,CityProjectNo.
11C002
9.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-48supportingStateofMinnesota2012
bondingrequestasrelatedtoacquisitionofBertramChainofLakesproperty
10.ConsiderationofrequestbyPaxmarLLCforareductioninWACandSACfeesfor2011
11.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-52acceptingbidsandawardingcontractfor
CSAH75PedestrianUnderpassandPathwayImprovements,CityProjectNo.10C010
12.Addeditems
13.Adjournment
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
1
5A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforJune13th (TK)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheattachedbillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedsincethelastCouncilmeeting.
SubjecttoMNStatutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecks
forpayment.ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunless
directedotherwise.
IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillregisters,thesecanbeapprovedwith
theconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfromconsentanddiscussed
priortomakingamotionforapproval.
A1.BudgetImpact:None
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethebillregistersforatotalamountof$2,490,961.67.
2.MotiontoapprovethebillregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Billregisters
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
1
5B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred
recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe
hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers.
A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget)
A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining
involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as
needed,untilreplaced.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached
list.
2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures.
C.RECOMMENDATION:
BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff
recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas
listed.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Listofnew/terminatedemployees
Name Title Department Hire Date Class
Kevin Krzenski Program Supervisor MCC 5/13 PT
Amanda Erlandson Program Supervisor MCC 5/13 PT
Kelsey Johnson Fitness Instructor MCC 5/23 PT
Abigail Jones Life Guard MCC 5/18 PT
Michelle Gueldner Customer Care Consultant FNM 5/19 PT
Lyndsie Theisen Life Guard MCC 5/23 PT
Donald Lumley Jr.Liquor Store Clerk Liquor Store 5/24 PT
Nathan Kranz Seasonal Streets Worker Streets 6/6 Seasonal
Name Reason Department Last Day Class
Brian Nistler Voluntary FNM 5/13 Seasonal
Genevieve Plude Voluntary Liquor Store 6/3 PT
NEW EMPLOYEES
TERMINATING EMPLOYEES
Book1: 6/7/2011
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
1
5C.Considerationofacceptingquotesandawardingcontractforthe2011Street
BituminousSealcoatProject (BP,TM)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
Councilisrequestedtoconsideracceptingquotesandawardingacontractforthe2011
StreetBituminousSealcoatProject.The2011projecttotalsapproximately63,724square
yardsofCitystreets.Theareastobesealcoatedhavebeenpatchedandcracksealedby
cityforcesinpreparationforthisproject.
Thesealcoatstreetsareasfollows:
SUNSET PONDS CARLISLE VILLAGE
95TH STREETBAKKEN STREET
94TH STREETGARVEY COURT
93RD STREETGATEWATER DRIVE
93RD STREETGATEWAY CIRCLE
92ND STREET82ND STREET
91ST STREET83RD STREET
GIFFORTCOURT84TH STREET
GOODRICHDRIVE85TH STREET
GOODRICHDRIVE86TH STREET
GOLDEN POND LANE
GINGHAM COURT
GILLARD AVENUE
Wehavehadseveralprojectsonourroadwaysysteminpastyearsspendingmillionsof
dollars.Itisveryimportantthatwefollowuptheseprojectswithagoodmaintenance
program.Standardstodayinroadmaintenancearetosealcoatnewroadsfive(5)years
aftertheyhavebeenconstructedandeveryseven(7)yearsafterthat.Thegoalweare
tryingtoachieveisforourresidentialstreetstolast30to35years.
PlansandspecificationsweredraftedbythePublicWorksDepartmentandmade
availableonMay11,2011.TheRFQopeningoccurredonMay31,2011at10a.m.The
Cityreceivedatotaloffourquotes;AlliedBlacktopCo.intheamountof$.99persquare
yardtotaling$63,086.76;CaldwellAsphaltCo.intheamountof$1.02persquareyard
totaling$64,998.48;PearsonBrothersInc.intheamountof$1.05persquareyard
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
2
totaling$66,910.20;andAstechCorp.intheamountof$1.33persquareyardtotaling
$84,752.92.ThecontractwouldbeawardedtoAlliedBlacktopuponapprovalfrom
Council.
A1.BudgetImpact:Inpreparationforthisproject,wehaveplaced$70,000inthe
2011StreetDepartmentBudget.Theportionoftheprojectcoveredunderthis
amountwillbeallofthestreetslistedinthespecsforwhichthelowquotecame
toatotalof$63,086.76fromAlliedBlacktopCo.Theremainingbudgetfunds
willbeusedtofundsurfacerepairpreparationsandsealcoatmaterialstesting
priortothesealcoatingprocess.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Aprojectofthissizenormallytakestwodays.We
willhaveaCityinspectoronthejobsiteforthosedays.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapprovethequotesandawardthecontracttoAlliedBlacktopCo.inthe
amountof$63,086.76forthe2011StreetBituminousSealcoatingProject.This
projectistobecompletedpercontractbyAugust26,2011.
2.Motiontodenythequotesandnotawardthecontract.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendstheCityCouncilapproveAlternative#1,acceptingquotesand
awardingthecontracttoAlliedBlacktopCo.intheamountof$63,086.76.ThePublic
WorksDepartmentwillbeinspectingtheprojecttoseethatthecontractoradherestothe
plansandspecifications.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Copyofthequotetabulation
QUOTE TABULATION SUMMARY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
2011 STREET
BITUMINOUS SEALCOAT
QUOTES OPENED: TUESDAY, MAY 31, 2011 AT 10:00 A.M.
BID
SECURITY
CONTRACTOR (X)COMMENTS
ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY
10503 89TH AVE N X NONE
MAPLE GROVE MN 55369
CALDWELL ASPHALT CO INC
24060 175TH STREET NE X NONE
HAWICK MN 56273
PEARSON BROS INC
11079 LAMONT AVE NE X NONE
HANOVER MN 55341
ASTECH CORP
PO BOX 1025 X NONE
ST CLOUD MN 56302
Tom Moores, Street Superintendent
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN
MONTICELLO CITY HALL
QUOTE A
$0.99 $63,086.76
$1.02
$1.05
$1.33
CITY STREETS
UNIT PRICE
CITY STREETS
TOTAL SUM
QUOTES RECEIVED: 4
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the quotes as received on May 31, 2011
$66,910.20
$84,752.92
$64,998.48
F:\ADMIN\WordProc\STREET DEPT\QUOTE TAB - 2011 SEALCOATING PROJECT - 053111: 6/6/2011 - PAGE 1 OF 1 -
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
1
5D.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-45callingforaPublicHearingfor
considerationofvacationofdrainageandutilityeasementsaspetitionedbythe
landownersofOutlotA,MonticelloBusinessCenter5thAddition;Applicant:Quad
Development,LLC (AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
QuadDevelopment,LLCsubmittedanapplicationandpetitionforCounciltocallfora
PublicHearingtoconsidergrantingvacationofutilityanddrainageeasementslocatedon
partoftheirpropertyatMonticelloBusinessCenter5thAddition.
QuadDevelopmentisworkingwithapotentialbuyeronaproposeddevelopmentofLot
1,Block1,MonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition.Inordertoplatthatlot,thedrainage
andutilityeasementsoverthecurrentOutlotA,MonticelloBusinessCenter5th Addition
mustbevacatedovertheareatobeplattedasbuildablelot.Withtheapprovalofthefinal
plat(seeItem5E),theneededdrainageandutilityeasementsforthenewplatwillbe
established.TheapprovalofthefinalplatinItem5Eisthereforeconditionedonthe
vacationoftheeasementsoverOutlotAonJune27th andthenreestablishedperfinalplat
forMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition.
Citystaffwillpublishtherequirednoticeforthepublichearingandsendoutnoticesto
propertiesthatcouldhaveapotentialofbeingaffectedbytheeasementvacation.
A1.BudgetImpact:Somestafftimeandcostsofpublicationandnotificationof
affectedproperties.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Somestafftimewasconsumedinresearchingand
preparingthisrequestforCouncil.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-45callingforaPublicHearingfor
considerationofvacationofeasementsaspetitionedbyQuadDevelopment,LLC
forOutlotA,MonticelloBusinessCenter5thAddition.
2.MotiontonotcallforaPublicHearingforconsiderationofeasementvacationat
thistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.CitystaffsupportsholdingaPublicHearingto
considervacatingtheproposedeasementareainordertopermitQuadDevelopmentto
moveforwardontheirbuildingplans.
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
2
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2011-45
Applicationandpetitionforproposedeasementvacation–QuadDevelopment
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2011-45
CALLINGFORAPUBLICHEARINGONVACATIONOFDRAINAGEANDUTILITY
EASEMENTSOFOUTLOTA,MONTICELLOBUSINESSCENTER5TH ADDITION
UPONPETITIONOFTHEPROPERTYOWNER,QUADDEVELOPMENTLLC
WHEREAS,apetitionsignedbythepropertyownerofOutlotA,MonticelloBusinessCenter
FifthAdditionintheCityofMonticellowasreceivedbytheCityClerkonthe31stdayofMay,
2011;and
WHEREAS,thepetitionrequestedthattheCityCouncil,pursuanttoMinnesotaStatutes462.358
and412.851,vacatealldrainageandutilityeasementsoverandacrossthepropertylegally
describedas:
OutlotA,MonticelloBusinessCenterFifthAddition,CityofMonticello,Wright
CountyMinnesota.
WHEREAS,theCityClerkhasreviewedandexaminedthepetitionanddeterminedthatthe
affixedsignatureconstitutesthelandownerofthepropertyabuttingtheabove-described
easement;and
WHEREAS,acopyofsaidpetitionisattachedhereto;
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:thattheCouncilwillconsiderthevacationoftheabove-describedeasementata
publichearingtobeheldonthe27th dayofJune,2011,intheCityCouncilChambersat7p.m.;
and
BEITFURTHERRESOLVED,thatapprovalofthefinalplatofMonticelloBusinessCenter
SixthAdditionwouldbecontingentonthevacationofthedrainageandutilityeasementstobe
consideredatthepublichearing;and
BEITFURTHERRESOLVED,thatvacationofthedrainageandutilityeasementsrequiresthe
propertyownertoberesponsibleforrelocatinganyprivateutilitiesfromtheeasementareaat
theirexpense.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis13th dayofJune,2011.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
1
5E.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-47approvingMonticelloBusiness
Center6th AdditionFinalPlat,approvingtheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th
Additiondevelopmentagreement,andreestablishingdrainageandutilityeasements
(AS,BW)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
QuadDevelopment,LLCisrequestingCityapprovalofafinalplatfortheMonticello
BusinessCenter6th Addition,asinglelotcommercialsubdivisionlocatedalongsouthof
SchoolBoulevardandeastofHighway25.
Thefinalplatisareplatofexistingpropertyandisproposedtofacilitatetherelocating
Monticello-BigLakePetHospital.TheCouncilpreviouslyapprovedtheneededCUPfor
veterinaryfacilityandtheamendmenttoPUDfortheQuadDevelopmentproject.
Thelotbeingcreatedis69,265squarefeet,or1.59acres.Withtheexceptionofthe
previouslyplattedLot1,Block1,MonticelloBusinessCenter5th Addition,thebalance
ofthepropertywillbereplattedasanoutlot.Theoutlotwillbecoveredbyamunicipal
drainageandutilityeasement.
TheCityCouncilapprovedthepreliminaryplatfortheMonticelloBusinessCenter5th
AdditiononOctober22nd,2007.Atthattime,theCouncilalsoapprovedaPUDforthe
commercial/officedevelopmentknownasQuadDevelopment.Councilwillnotethat
theplatconfigurationproposedfortheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Additionfinalplat
variesfromtheoriginallotconfigurationshown,astheveterinaryclinicseeksprivate
ownershipovertheirparkingarea.Thefinalplatpresentedmakesthataccommodation.
InapublichearingonJune27th,2011,theCouncilwillbeaskedtovacateexisting
easementsontheplatofMonticelloBusinessCenter5th Addition.(Pleaseseeitem5D.)
ThevacationwillessentiallyreleasethatportionofeasementovertheareaofOutlotAto
beplattedasLot1,Block1,MonticelloBusinessCenter6th Additionandthenreestablish
neweasementsasshownonthesubmittedfinalplat.Approvalofthisfinalplatis
contingentonthatvacationandreestablishmentofrequiredeasement.
Inthatregard,theCityEngineerhasreviewedthefinalplatandhasfoundthatall
requiredeasements(aswillbeestablishedpendingvacation)areshown.
Theapplicantwillbeaskedtoexecuteadevelopmentagreementforthisaddition.A
draftofthedevelopmentagreementhasbeenincludedforreference.Thedevelopment
agreementincludestheconditionsasnotedintheoriginalPUDapproval.Aseparate
CUPproceedingrecordwillberecordedfortheveterinaryclinic.Thedevelopment
agreementrequiresanewletterofcreditforthepublicinfrastructuretobecompleted
withthisphase,aswellasthepaymentofapplicabletrunkfeesfortheareatobeplatted.
A1.BudgetImpact:None.
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
2
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffreviewofthefinalplathasbeencompletedand
costsforsuchreviewwillbecoveredundertheoriginalapplicationplanreview
deposit.Staffwillprovidenecessarysupportforfinalplatexecutionand
executionandrecordingofdevelopmentagreement.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapprovetheFinalPlatoftheMonticelloBusinessCenter6thAddition;
approvethedraftDevelopmentAgreement,withtheconditionthattheapplicant
enterintoadevelopmentagreementwiththeCityandcomplywiththetermsof
theapprovedPUD;andapprovethereestablishmentofdrainageandutility
easementsasdescribedontheFinalPlat,contingentonthevacationofdrainage
andutilityeasementonJune27th,2011.
2.MotiontodenyapprovaltheFinalPlatoftheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th
Addition,basedonfindingstobeidentifiedbytheCityCouncil.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsapprovaloftheFinalPlatanddraftDevelopmentAgreementfor
MonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition,withtheconditionsnotedinAlternative#1.
Staffalsorecommendsapprovalofreestablishingthedrainageandutilityeasements,
contingentonthevacationhearingonJune27th.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2011-47
B-ProposedFinalPlat,MonticelloBusinessCenter6thAddition
C-ApprovedPreliminaryPlat,MonticelloBusinessCenter5thAddition
D-DraftDevelopmentAgreement
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2011-47
APPROVINGFINALPLATANDDEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT
FORMONTICELLOBUSINESSCENTER6TH ADDITION
WHEREAS,theMonticelloPlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonAugust7,2007,for
theconsiderationofthepreliminaryplatoftheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition;and
WHEREAS,aftertakingpubliccomment,thePlanningCommissionrecommendedapprovalof
thepreliminaryplatoftheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th AdditiontotheCityCouncil;and
WHEREAS,theMonticelloCityCouncilreviewedtherecommendationofthePlanning
CommissionandapprovedthepreliminaryplatoftheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition
onAugust27th,2007;and
WHEAREAS,thepreliminaryandfinalplatfortheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition
identifythespecificplansandusesfortheproposedMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition;
and
WHEREAS,thefinalplatoftheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Additionisconsistentwiththe
proposedvacationofdrainageandutilityeasementstobeconsideredforapprovalbytheCouncil
onJune27,2011.
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA,thattherevisedfinalplatoftheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition,with
drainageandutilityeasementsasrequired,isherebyapprovedcontingentuponthefollowing:
meetingallconditionsofthesubdivisionordinance;and
approvalofvacationofdrainageandutilityeasementsacrossOutlotA,Monticello
BusinessCenter5th Addition
BEITFURTHERRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA,thattheDevelopmentAgreementfortheMonticelloBusinessCenter6th
Addition,withassignmentofthespecifictermsandconditionsforplatdevelopment,ishereby
approved.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis13thdayofJune,2011.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_______________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
06.07.11(V3)1
(reservedforrecordinginformation)
DEVELOPMENTCONTRACT
ANDPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENT
(DeveloperInstalledImprovements)
MONTICELLOBUSINESSCENTER6th ADDITION
AGREEMENT dated____________________,2011,byandbetweenthe CITYOFMONTICELLO,
aMinnesotamunicipalcorporation(“City”),and QUADDEVELOPMENT.,aMinnesotaLimitedLiability
Corporationoritsassigns(the“Developer”).
1.REQUESTFORPLATAPPROVAL.TheDeveloperhasaskedtheCitytoapproveaplatand
amendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopmentfor MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 6TH ADDITION (referredtoin
thisContractasthe"plats"andthe“Development”)one(1)commerciallot.ThelandissituatedintheCountyof
Wright,StateofMinnesota,andislegallydescribedontheattachedExhibit“A”.
2.CONDITIONSOFAPPROVAL.TheCityherebyapprovesthedevelopmentonconditionthat
theDeveloperenterintothisContract,furnishthesecurityrequiredbyit,andrecordtheplatwiththeCountyRecorder
orRegistrarofTitleswithin100daysaftertheCityCouncilapprovesthefinalplatsortheexecutionofthisContract,
whicheveroccurslater.
3.CONDITIONFORSUBSEQUENTAPPROVALS.Nofinalplatforchangesoramendments
tothisDevelopmentAgreementshallbeapproved,norshallconstructioncommenceforsuchadditionallanduses,until
anamendmentoftheDevelopmentAgreementisprocessedandapproved,subjecttotherequirementsoftheMonticello
ZoningandSubdivisionOrdinances.
4.RIGHTTOPROCEED.Withintheplatsorlandtobeplatted,theDevelopermaynotconstruct
sewerlines,waterlines,streets,utilities,publicorprivateimprovements,oranybuildingsuntilallthefollowing
06.07.11(V3)2
conditionshavebeensatisfied:1)thisagreementhasbeenfullyexecutedbybothpartiesandfiledwiththeCityClerk,
2)thenecessarysecurityhasbeenreceivedbytheCity,3)theplatandthiscontracthasbeensubmittedtotheWright
CountyRecorder'sOffice,and4)theCityhasissuedaletterthatallconditionshavebeensatisfiedandthatthe
Developermayproceed.
5.PHASEDDEVELOPMENT.Thedevelopmentisamulti-phasedpreliminaryplat,andtheCity
mayrefusetoapprovefinalplatsofsubsequentphasesiftheDeveloperhasbreachedthisContractandthebreachhas
notbeenremedied.DevelopmentofsubsequentphasesmaynotproceeduntiltheCityapprovesDevelopment
Contractsforsuchphases.
6.CHANGESINOFFICIALCONTROLS.Fortwo(2)yearsfromthedateofthisContract,no
amendmentstotheCity'sComprehensivePlan,orofficialcontrolsshallapplytooraffecttheuse,development
density,lotsize,lotlayoutordedicationsoftheapprovedplatunlessrequiredbystateorfederallaworagreedtoin
writingbytheCityandtheDeveloper.Thereafter,notwithstandinganythinginthisContracttothecontrary,tothefull
extentpermittedbystatelaw,theCitymayrequirecompliancewithanyamendmentstotheCity'sComprehensive
Plan.
7.ZONING.Exceptasotherwiseprovidedherein,thesubjectpropertyshallbesubjecttothezoning
regulationsforthePlannedUnitDevelopmentDistrictandtherequirementsandstandardsofthecommercialdistrictin
effectatthetimethefinalplatisapproved,astheyapplytocommercialbuildings.Ifthereisaconflictamongthese
regulations,theconflictshallberesolvedintheorderlistedbelowwithitemnumberonebeingprimary:
(1)PlannedUnitDevelopmentAgreement[thisdocument].
(2)PlannedUnitDevelopmentZoningDistrictRegulations
(3)B-4ZoningDistrictRegulations
8.DESIGNSTANDARDS.TheapplicableZoningDistrictRegulationsareequaltothosesetforth
intheB-4ZoningDistrictRegulation,exceptasmodifiedherein.
9.DEVELOPMENTPLANS.TheDevelopmentshallbedevelopedinaccordancewiththeplans
submittedforconditionalusepermitreviewandapproved(“ApprovedDevelopmentPlans”)asfollows.Theplans
shallbeattachedtothiscontractasExhibit“B”.
06.07.11(V3)3
Plat–MonticelloBusinessCenter6th AdditionApproved6/13/11
PlannedUnitDevelopmentSitePlanApproved6/13/11
PlannedUnitDevelopmentBuildingElevationsApproved5/23/11
10.IMPROVEMENTS.Consistentwiththeagreementandsecuritysuppliedwiththefinalplatof
MonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition,theDevelopershallinstallandpayforthefollowing:
A.SanitarySewerSystem
B.WaterSystem
C.StormSewerSystem
D.PathwaysandSidewalks
E.ConcreteCurbandGutter
F.ParkingLotLights
G.SiteGrading,andErosionControl
H.UndergroundUtilities
I.SettingofIronMonuments
J.SurveyingandStaking
TheimprovementsshallbeinstalledinaccordancewiththeCitysubdivisionordinance;Citystandardspecifications
forutilitiesconstruction;andanyotherordinances.Theimprovementsshallbeinaccordancewithimprovementsto
thepropertyasshownonsubmittedandapproveddocuments.TheDevelopershallsubmitplansandspecifications
whichhavebeenpreparedbyacompetentregisteredprofessionalengineertotheCityforapprovalbytheCity
Engineer.TheCitymay,attheCity'sdiscretionandattheDeveloper'sexpense,haveoneormoreCityinspectorsand
asoilengineerinspecttheworkforpublicimprovementsonafullorpart-timebasis.TheDeveloper,itscontractors
andsubcontractors,shallfollowallwritteninstructionsreceivedfromtheCity'sinspectorssubjecttoDeveloper’s
plansandspecifications.TheDeveloper'sengineershallprovideforon-siteprojectmanagement.TheDeveloper's
engineerisresponsiblefordesignchangesandcontractadministrationbetweentheDeveloperandtheDeveloper's
contractor.TheDeveloperorhisengineershallscheduleapre-constructionmeetingatamutuallyagreeabletimeat
CityHallwithallpartiesconcerned,includingtheCitystaff,toreviewtheprogramfortheconstructionwork.Within
06.07.11(V3)4
thirty(30)daysafterthecompletionoftheimprovementsandbeforethesecurityisreleased,theDevelopershall
supplytheCitywithacompletesetofreproducible"asconstructed"plans,anelectronicfileofthe"asconstructed"
plansinanAutoCAD.DWGfileor.DXFfile,andtwocompletesetsofblueline"asconstructed"plans,allprepared
inaccordancewithCitystandards.
InaccordancewithMinnesotaStatutes505.02,thefinalplacementofironmonumentsforalllotcornersmust
becompletedbeforetheapplicablesecurityisreleased.TheDeveloper'ssurveyorshallalsosubmitawrittennoticeto
theCitycertifyingthatthemonumentshavebeeninstalled.
11.PERMITS.TheDevelopershallobtainorrequireitscontractorsandsubcontractorstoobtainall
necessarypermits,includingbutnotlimitedto:
WrightCountyforCountyRoadAccessandworkinCountyRights-of-Way
WrightCountySoilandWaterConservationDistrict
MinnesotaDepartmentofHealthforWatermains
NPDESPermitforStormwaterConnections
MPCAforSanitarySewerandHazardousMaterialRemovalandDisposal
DNRfordewatering
CityofMonticelloforBuildingPermitsandworkinRightsofWay
12.DEWATERING.Duetothevariablenatureofgroundwaterlevelsandstormwaterflows,itwill
betheDeveloper’sandtheDeveloper’scontractorsandsubcontractorsresponsibilitytosatisfythemselveswith
regardtotheelevationofgroundwaterintheareaandthelevelofeffortneededtoperformdewateringandstorm
flowroutingoperations.Alldewateringshallbeinaccordancewithallapplicablecounty,state,andfederalrules
andregulations.DNRregulationsregardingappropriationspermitsshallalsobestrictlyfollowed.
13.TIMEOFPERFORMANCE.TheDevelopershallinstallallrequiredpublicimprovementsby
August30th oftheyearfollowingtheyearofrecordingofthefinalplat.TheDevelopermay,however,requestan
extensionoftimefromtheCity.Ifanextensionisgranted,itshallbeconditioneduponupdatingthesecuritypostedby
theDevelopertoreflectcostincreasesandtheextendedcompletiondate.
14.LICENSE.TheDeveloperherebygrantstheCity,itsagents,employees,officersandcontractorsa
licensetoentertheplattedpropertytoperformallworkandinspectionsdeemedappropriatebytheCityinconjunction
withplatdevelopment.
06.07.11(V3)5
15.EROSIONCONTROL,STORMWATERCONTROLANDSTREETCLEANUP.
Priortoinitiatingsitegrading,anerosioncontrolplanshallbeimplementedbytheDeveloperandinspectedand
approvedbytheCity.TheDevelopershallcleandirtanddebrisfromstreetsthathasresultedfromsiteand
constructionworkintheDevelopmentbytheDeveloperoranyotherpersonorentity.TheDevelopershallcomply
withallCityordinancesandpoliciesasrelatedtoerosioncontrolandstormwaterpollutionprevention.Theparties
recognizethattimeisoftheessenceincontrollingerosion.IftheDeveloperdoesnotcomplywiththeerosion
controlplanandscheduleorsupplementaryinstructionsreceivedfromtheCity,orrepeatedlyfailstocleanand
sweepstreets,andsuchnoncomplianceorfailureisnotcuredafterten(10)businessdays’noticetoDeveloper,the
Citymaytakesuchactionasitdeemsappropriate,includingtheperformanceofthenecessaryworkbyCitystaffor
contractingtohaveitperformed.Chargesincurredwiththeenforcementoferosioncontrolaretheresponsibilityof
thedeveloper.Nositeandconstructionworkwillbeallowedandnobuildingpermitswillbeissuedunlessthe
developmentisinfullcompliancewiththeapprovederosioncontrolplanandstormwatercontrolmeasuresarein
place.
16.OWNERSHIPOFIMPROVEMENTS.Uponcompletionoftheworkandconstruction
requiredbythisContract,thewatermains,hydrantsandvalvesandthesanitarysewermains,manholes,casting
improvementsandappurtenanceslyingwithinpubliceasementsshallbecomeCitypropertywithoutfurthernoticeor
action.Thestormsewer,parkinglotlightingandindividualwaterandsanitarysewerservicesareprivatelyowned
andmaintained.
17.EASEMENTS.
A.TheCityownseasementsfordrainageandutilitypurposesoverportionsofthesubject
propertyasshownontheapprovedplat.Ownerwouldliketoconstructapavedparkinglotandaccessdriveaisleson
thesubjectpropertywhichwillencroachintotheCity'seasementareasasdepictedontheapprovedplat.
B.TheCityherebyapprovestheencroachmentinitseasementareasfortheconstruction,use,
andmaintenanceoftheproposedpavedparkinglotandaccessdriveaislesasdepictedontheapprovedplat.
06.07.11(V3)6
C.Ownershallberesponsibleforallcostsrelatingtoconstruction,reconstruction,maintenance,
andrepair,includingsnowremoval,withrespecttothepavedparkinglotanddriveaisles.Thismaintenanceagreement
isapersonalobligationofOwnerandshallbebindingupontheexecutors,administrators,successors,heirsandassigns
ofOwner.
D.InconsiderationofbeingallowedtoencroachintheCity'seasementareas,Owner,its/their
successors,heirsandassigns,herebyagree(s)toindemnifyandholdtheCityharmlessfromallcostsandexpenses,
claimsandliability,includingattorney'sfees,relatingtoorarisingoutofthisgranttoOwnerofpermissiontoencroach
intheCity'seasementareasfortheconstruction,reconstruction
19.CLAIMS.IntheeventthattheCityreceivesclaimsfromlabor,materialmen,orothersthatwork
requiredbythisContracthasbeenperformed,thesumsduethemhavenotbeenpaid,andthelaborers,materialmen,
orothersareseekingpaymentfromtheCity,theDeveloperherebyauthorizestheCitytocommenceanInterpleader
actionpursuanttoRule22,MinnesotaRulesofCivilProcedurefortheDistrictCourts,todrawuponthelettersof
creditinanamountupto125percentoftheclaim(s)anddepositthefundsincompliancewiththeRule,andupon
suchdeposit,theDevelopershallrelease,discharge,anddismisstheCityfromanyfurtherproceedingsasitpertainsto
thelettersofcreditdepositedwiththeDistrictCourt,exceptthattheCourtshallretainjurisdictiontodetermine
attorneys'feespursuanttothisContract.
20.STORMSEWERAREACHARGE.TheDevelopmentissubjecttoastormsewerareacharge.
Thestormsewerareachargeshallbepaidonaperunitbasisatthetimeoftheissuanceofbuildingpermits.The
totalchargeshallbeadjustedtoreflecttheperacrerateineffectatthetimeoftheissuanceofeachbuildingpermit.
Forthisphase,thedevelopershallberesponsiblefortheacreageofLot1,Block1,whichis1.59acres.This
amountshallbepayableatbuildingpermit.
Futurephasesofdevelopmentshallberesponsibleforpaymentoftrunkchargescommensuratewiththe
areaofthelot(s)tobeplatted,aswellasthatportionofOutlotA,asapplicable.
21.SANITARYSEWERAREACHARGE.TheDevelopmentissubjecttoasanitarysewerarea
charge.Thetotalsanitarysewerareachargeshallbepaidonaperunitbasisatthetimeoftheissuanceofbuilding
06.07.11(V3)7
permits.Thetotalchargeshallbeadjustedtoreflecttheperacrerateineffectatthetimeoftheissuanceofeach
buildingpermit.Forthisphase,thedevelopershallberesponsiblefortheacreageofLot1,Block1,whichis1.59
acres.Thisamountshallbepayableatbuildingpermit.
Futurephasesofdevelopmentshallberesponsibleforpaymentoftrunkchargescommensuratewiththe
areaofthelot(s)tobeplatted,aswellasthatportionofOutlotA,asapplicable..
22.WATERMAINAREACHARGE.TheDevelopmentissubjecttoawatermainareacharge.The
totalwatermainareachargeshallbepaidonaperunitbasisatthetimeoftheissuanceofbuildingpermits.The
totalchargeshallbeadjustedtoreflecttheperacrerateineffectatthetimeoftheissuanceofeachbuildingpermit.
Forthisphase,thedevelopershallberesponsiblefortheacreageofLot1,Block1,whichis1.59acres.This
amountshallbepayableatbuildingpermit.
Futurephasesofdevelopmentshallberesponsibleforpaymentoftrunkchargescommensuratewiththe
areaofthelot(s)tobeplatted,aswellasthatportionofOutlotA,asapplicable..
23.SUMMARYOFSECURITYREQUIREMENTS.Toguaranteecompliancewiththeterms
ofthisagreement,paymentofthecostsofallpublicimprovements,constructionofallpublicimprovements,and
completionoflandscapingandlightingpertheplannedunitdevelopment,theDeveloperhasfurnishedtheCitywitha
letterofcredit,intheformattachedhereto,fromabank("security")for $______________tocoverthe
improvementsoftheentirepreliminaryplattedareashownwithMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition.The
securitywasfurnishedwiththefinalplatanddevelopmentagreementforMonticelloBusinessCenter6th Addition.
Theamountofthesecuritywascalculatedasfollows:
CONSTRUCTIONCOSTS:
SanitarySewer$Tobeprovided
Watermain$Tobeprovided
CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $
OTHERCOSTS:
LotCorners/IronMonuments($300.00x4)$1,200.00
06.07.11(V3)8
TOTALCOSTS$
TOTALSECURITIES:TotalCostsX125%$
Thisbreakdownisforhistoricalreference;itisnotarestrictionontheuseofthesecurity.Thebankshallbesubjectto
theapprovaloftheCityAdministrator.Thesecurityshallbeforanautomaticallyrenewingterm.Individualsecurity
instrumentsmaybeforshortertermsprovidedtheyareautomaticallyrenewedonanannualbasisuntilexpiration.
TheCitymaydrawdownthesecurity,with30dayswrittennoticetoDeveloper,foranyviolationofthetermsofthis
Contractorifthesecurityisallowedtolapsepriortotheendoftherequiredterm.Iftherequiredpublic
improvementsarenotcompletedatleastthirty(30)dayspriortotherenewalofthesecurity,theCitymayalsodrawit
down.Ifthesecurityisdrawndown,theproceedsshallbeusedtocurethedefault.Uponreceiptofproofsatisfactory
totheCitythatworkhasbeencompletedandfinancialobligationstotheCityhavebeensatisfied,withCityapproval
thesecuritymaybereducedfromtimetotimebyninetypercent(90%)ofthefinancialobligationsthathavebeen
satisfied.Tenpercent(10%)oftheamountscertifiedbytheDeveloper'sengineershallberetainedassecurityuntilall
improvementshavebeencompleted,allfinancialobligationstotheCitysatisfied,therequired"asconstructed"plans
havebeenreceivedbytheCity,awarrantysecurityisprovided,andthepublicimprovementsareacceptedbytheCity
Council.TheCitystandardspecificationsforutilitiesconstructionoutlineproceduresforsecurityreductions.
PriortoCityCouncilapprovalofthefinalplat,theDevelopershallfurnishaboundarysurveyoftheproposed
propertytobeplattedwithallpropertycornermonumentationinplaceandmarkedwithlathandaflag.Any
encroachmentsonoradjacenttothepropertyshallbenotedonthesurvey.TheDevelopershallpostasecurityforthe
finalplacementofinteriorsubdivisionironmonumentsatpropertycorners.ThesecuritywillbeheldbytheCityuntil
theDeveloper'slandsurveyorcertifiesthatallironshavebeensetfollowingsitegradingandutilityandstreet
construction.Inaddition,thecertificateofsurveymustalsoincludeacertificationthatallironsforaspecificlothave
eitherbeenfoundorsetpriortotheissuanceofabuildingpermitforthatlot.
24.SUMMARYOFCASHREQUIREMENTS.Thefollowingisasummaryofthecash
requirementsunderthisContractwhichmustbefurnishedtotheCitypriortothetimeoffinalplatapproval.These
areescrowdepositsonlyandarebasedon2%ofestimatedpublicimprovementcosts.Thedepositsareusingto
06.07.11(V3)9
securecostsforreviewofrecordplatandplandocumentsforconformancetoapprovedplansandreviewof
constructionplansandinspectionofinstalledimprovements.Theseamountsaresubjecttoreconciliationatthetime
ofprojectcompletion.
TheestimatedcostsofpublicimprovementsforthisDevelopmentare$
EngineeringReviewandInspection$
TotalCashRequirements$
*Feesreconciledtoactualexpensesatcloseofproject.
25.SPECIALPROVISIONS.Thefollowingspecialprovisionsshallapplytoplatdevelopment:
A.TheDeveloperisrequiredtosubmitthefinalplatinelectronicformat.Theelectronicformat
shallbeeitherAutoCAD.DWGfileora.DXFfile.Allas-builtconstructionrecorddrawings(e.g.,grading,utilities,
andstreets)shallbeinelectronicformatinaccordancewithstandardCityspecifications.TheDevelopershallalso
submitonecompletesetofreproducibleconstructionplansonMylar.
26.RESPONSIBILITYFORCOSTS.
A.TheDeveloperhasprovidedadepositforthereviewandinspectionoftheDevelopment.
TheDevelopershallpayallactualdocumentedcostsinexcessofthedepositincurredbyitortheCityinconjunction
withthedevelopmentforCityadministration,legal,engineeringandplanningexpensesincurredinconnectionwith
approvalandacceptanceofthedevelopmentandpreparationofthisContract.Allexpensesoverthedepositwillbe
billedatprojectcompletion.
B.TheDevelopershallholdtheCityanditsofficers,employees,andagentsharmlessfrom
claimsmadebyitandthirdpartiesfordamagessustainedorcostsincurredresultingfromdevelopment,withthe
exceptionofanydamagesorcostsresultingfromthenegligenceorintentionalactsoftheCityoritsemployees,agents
orcontractors.TheDevelopershallindemnifytheCityanditsofficers,employees,andagentsforallcosts,damages,
orexpenseswhichtheCitymaypayorincurinconsequenceofsuchclaims,includingattorneys'fees.
C.TheDevelopershallreimbursetheCityforallreasonablecostsincurredintheenforcementofthis
Contract,includingengineeringandattorneys'fees.
06.07.11(V3)10
D.TheDevelopershallpayinfullallbillssubmittedtoitbytheCityforobligationsforCity
servicesdueunderthisContractwithinthirty(30)daysafterreceipt.Ifthebillsarenotpaidontime,theCitymay
haltdevelopmentandconstructionuntilthebillsarepaidinfull.Billsnotpaidwithinthirty(30)daysshallaccrue
interestattherateofeightpercent(8%)peryear.
E.Inadditiontothechargesreferredtoherein,othercustomaryfeesmaybeimposed,suchas
butnotlimitedto,buildingpermitfeesandsewerandwateraccesscharges.
27.DEVELOPER’SDEFAULT.IntheeventofdefaultbytheDeveloperastoanyoftheworktobe
performedbyithereunder,theCitymay,atitsoption,performtheworkandtheDevelopershallpromptlyreimburse
theCityforanyexpenseincurredbytheCity,providedtheDeveloper,exceptinanemergencyasreasonably
determinedbytheCity,isfirstgivennoticeoftheworkindefaultandtheopportunitytocure,notlessthanthirty(30
daysinadvance.ThisContractisalicensefortheCitytoact,anditshallnotbenecessaryfortheCitytoseekaCourt
orderforpermissiontoentertheland.WhentheCitydoesanysuchwork,theCitymay,inadditiontoitsother
remedies,assessthecostinwholeorinpart.
28.MISCELLANEOUS.
A.TheDeveloperrepresentstotheCitythat,tothebestofDeveloper’sknowledge,the
developmentcomplieswithallcounty,metropolitan,state,andfederallawsandregulations,includingbutnotlimited
to:subdivisionordinances,zoningordinances,andenvironmentalregulations.Iftheplatceasestocomplywith
county,metropolitan,state,andfederallawsandregulations,theCitymay,atitsoption,afterthirty(30)daysnotice
andopportunitytocuretoDeveloperrefusetoallowconstructionordevelopmentworkuntiltheDeveloperdoes
comply.UpontheCity'sdemand,theDevelopershallceaseworkuntilthereiscompliance.
B.ThirdpartiesshallhavenorecourseagainsttheCityorDeveloperunderthisContract.
C.BreachofthetermsofthisContractbytheDeveloper,afterthirty(30)daysnoticeand
opportunitytocure,shallbegroundsfordenialofbuildingpermitsandacertificateofoccupancy.
D.Ifanyportion,section,subsection,sentence,clause,paragraph,orphraseofthisContractis
foranyreasonheldinvalid,suchdecisionshallnotaffectthevalidityoftheremainingportionofthisContract.
06.07.11(V3)11
E.TheactionorinactionoftheCityorDevelopershallnotconstituteawaiveroramendmentto
theprovisionsofthisContract.Tobebinding,amendmentsorwaiversshallbeinwriting,signedbythepartiesand
approvedbywrittenresolutionoftheCityCouncil.TheCity'sorDeveloper’sfailuretopromptlytakelegalactionto
enforcethisContractshallnotbeawaiverorrelease.
F.ThisContractshallrunwiththelandandmayberecordedagainstthetitletotheproperty.
TheDevelopercovenantswiththeCity,itssuccessorsandassigns,thattheDeveloperiswellseizedinfeetitleofthe
propertybeingfinalplattedand/orhasobtainedconsentstothisContract,intheformattachedhereto,fromallparties
whohaveaninterestintheproperty;thattherearenounrecordedinterestsinthepropertybeingfinalplatted;andthat
theDeveloperwillindemnifyandholdtheCityharmlessforanybreachoftheforegoingcovenants.
G.TheDevelopermaynotassignthisContractwithoutthewrittenpermissionoftheCity
Council.TheDeveloper'sobligationhereundershallcontinueinfullforceandeffecteveniftheDevelopersells-a
partorpartsoftheplattedland.
H.Developershalltakeoutandmaintainorcausetobetakenoutandmaintaineduntilsix(6)
monthsaftertheCityhasacceptedthepublicimprovements,publicliabilityandpropertydamageinsurancecovering
personalinjury,includingdeath,andclaimsforpropertydamagewhichmayariseoutofDeveloper'sworkorthework
ofitssubcontractorsorbyonedirectlyorindirectlyemployedbyanyofthem.Limitsforbodilyinjuryanddeathshall
benotlessthan$500,000.00foronepersonand$1,000,000.00foreachoccurrence;limitsforpropertydamageshall
benotlessthan$200,000.00foreachoccurrence;oracombinationsinglelimitpolicyof$1,000,000.00ormore.The
Cityshallbenamedasanadditionalinsuredonthepolicy,andtheDevelopershallfilewiththeCityacertificate
evidencingcoveragepriortotheCitysigningtheplat.ThecertificateshallprovidethattheCitymustbegiventen
(10)daysadvancewrittennoticeofthecancellationoftheinsurance
I.Eachright,powerorremedyhereinconferredupontheCityiscumulativeandinaddition
toeveryotherright,powerorremedy,expressorimplied,noworhereafterarising,availabletoCity,atlaworin
equity,orunderanyotheragreement,andeachandeveryright,powerandremedyhereinsetforthorotherwiseso
existingmaybeexercisedfromtimetotimeasoftenandinsuchorderasmaybedeemedexpedientbytheCityand
shallnotbeawaiveroftherighttoexerciseatanytimethereafteranyotherright,powerorremedy.
06.07.11(V3)12
J.Thestormsewersystemforthedevelopmentshallbeaprivatelymaintainedsystem.
K.One(1)sanitarysewerserviceandone(1)waterservice,withone(1)watermeter,willbe
providedtoeachlot,notincludingcondominiumlots,intheplat.Anyotherindividualserviceistheresponsibility
ofthedeveloper.
29.WARRANTY.TheDeveloperwarrantsallpublicimprovementsrequiredtobeconstructedbyit
pursuanttothisContractagainstpoormaterialandfaultyworkmanship.Thewarrantyperiodforundergroundutilities
istwo(2)yearsandshallcommencefollowingcompletionandacceptancebyCityCouncil.TheDeveloperorits
Contractorsshallpostmaintenancebonds,inaformacceptabletotheCity,intheamountoftwenty-fivepercent
(25%)offinalcertifiedconstructioncoststosecurethewarranties.TheCityshallretaintenpercent(10%)ofthe
securitypostedbytheDeveloperuntilthemaintenancebondsarefurnishedtheCityoruntilthewarrantyperiod
expires,whicheverfirstoccurs.Theretainagemaybeusedtopayforwarrantywork.TheCitystandardspecifications
forutilitiesconstructionidentifytheproceduresforfinalacceptanceofstreetsandutilities.
30.NOTICES.RequirednoticestotheDevelopershallbeinwriting,andshallbeeitherhanddelivered
totheDeveloper,itsemployeesoragents,ormailedtotheDeveloperbycertifiedmailatthefollowingaddress:Quad
Developmentc/o___________________________________________.NoticestotheCityshallbeinwritingand
shallbeeitherhanddeliveredtotheCityAdministrator,ormailedtotheCitybycertifiedmailincareoftheCity
Administratoratthefollowingaddress:MonticelloCityHall,505WalnutStreet,Monticello,Minnesota55362.
Noticesshallbeeffectiveupondelivery,ifhanddelivered,orone(1)businessdayafterthedateofmailing,ifmailed.
Eitherpartymaychangeitsaddressfornoticepurposesbynoticetotheotherpartygiveninthemannerprovidedin
thisParagraph.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
BY:___________________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
(SEAL)
AND__________________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
06.07.11(V3)13
COUNTYOFWRIGHT)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis________dayof______________,2011,by
ClintHerbstandbyJeffO’Neill,theMayorandCityAdministratoroftheCityofMonticello,aMinnesota
municipalcorporation,onbehalfofthecorporationandpursuanttotheauthoritygrantedbyitsCityCouncil.
______________________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
DEVELOPER:
QUADDEVELOPMENT,LLC.
BY:______________________________________
Its:
06.07.11(V3)14
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOF_____________)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis________dayof______________,2011,by
__________________________________the___________________ofQuadDevelopment,LLC.,alimited
liabilitycompanyunderthelawsofMinnesota,onbehalfofthelimitedliabilitycompany.
______________________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
DRAFTEDBY:
CITYOF MONTICELLO
505 WALNUT STREET,STE 1
MONTICELLO,MN 55362
AMS
06.07.11(V3)15
IRREVOCABLELETTEROFCREDIT
No.___________________
Date:_________________
TO:CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet
Monticello,Minnesota55362
DearSirorMadam:
Weherebyissue,fortheaccountof(NameofDeveloper)andinyourfavor,ourIrrevocableLetterofCreditin
theamountof$____________,availabletoyoubyyourdraftdrawnonsightontheundersignedbank.
Thedraftmust:
a)Beartheclause,"DrawnunderLetterofCreditNo.__________,dated________________,2_____,of(Nameof
Bank)";
b)BesignedbytheMayororCityAdministratoroftheCityofMonticello.
c)Bepresentedforpaymentat(AddressofBank),onorbefore4:00p.m.onNovember30,2007.
ThisLetterofCreditshallautomaticallyrenewforsuccessiveone-yeartermsunless,atleastforty-five(45)dayspriorto
thenextannualrenewaldate(whichshallbeNovember30ofeachyear),theBankdeliverswrittennoticetotheMonticelloCity
Administratorthatitintendstomodifythetermsof,orcancel,thisLetterofCredit.Writtennoticeiseffectiveifsentbycertified
mail,postageprepaid,anddepositedintheU.S.Mail,atleastforty-five(45)dayspriortothenextannualrenewaldateaddressed
asfollows:MonticelloCityAdministrator,MonticelloCityHall,505WalnutStreet,Monticello,MN55362,andisactually
receivedbytheCityAdministratoratleastthirty(30)dayspriortotherenewaldate.
ThisLetterofCreditsetsforthinfullourunderstandingwhichshallnotinanywaybemodified,amended,amplified,or
limitedbyreferencetoanydocument,instrument,oragreement,whetherornotreferredtoherein.
ThisLetterofCreditisnotassignable.ThisisnotaNotationLetterofCredit.Morethanonedrawmaybemadeunder
thisLetterofCredit.
ThisLetterofCreditshallbegovernedbythemostrecentrevisionoftheUniformCustomsandPracticefor
DocumentaryCredits,InternationalChamberofCommercePublicationNo.500.
WeherebyagreethatadraftdrawnunderandincompliancewiththisLetterofCreditshallbedulyhonoredupon
presentation.
BY:____________________________________
Its______________________________
06.07.11(V3)16
CERTIFICATEOFINSURANCE
PROJECT:
CERTIFICATEHOLDER:CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet
Monticello,Minnesota55362
INSURED:
ADDITIONALINSURED:CityofMonticello
AGENT:
WORKERS'COMPENSATION:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
COVERAGE-Workers'Compensation,Statutory.
GENERALLIABILITY:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
()ClaimsMade ()Occurrence
LIMITS:[Minimum]
BodilyInjuryandDeath:
$500,000foroneperson$1,000,000foreachoccurrence
PropertyDamage:
$200,000foreachoccurrence
-OR-
CombinationSingleLimitPolicy$1,000,000ormore
06.07.11(V3)17
COVERAGEPROVIDED:
OperationsofContractor:YES
OperationsofSub-Contractor(Contingent):YES
DoesPersonalInjuryIncludeClaimsRelatedtoEmployment?YES
CompletedOperations/Products:YES
ContractualLiability(BroadForm):YES
GovernmentalImmunityisWaived:YES
PropertyDamageLiabilityIncludes:
DamageDuetoBlastingYES
DamageDuetoCollapseYES
DamageDuetoUndergroundFacilitiesYES
BroadFormPropertyDamageYES
AUTOMOBILELIABILITY:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
(X)AnyAuto
LIMITS:[Minimum]
BodilyInjury:
$500,000eachperson$1,000,000eachoccurrence
PropertyDamage:
$500,000eachoccurrence
-OR-
CombinedSingleLimitPolicy:$1,000,000eachoccurrence
AREANYDEDUCTIBLESAPPLICABLETOBODILYINJURYORPROPERTYDAMAGEONANYOFTHE
ABOVECOVERAGES:
Ifso,list:Amount:$________________
[Nottoexceed$1,000.00]
06.07.11(V3)18
SHOULDANYOFTHEABOVEDESCRIBEDPOLICIESBECANCELLEDBEFORETHEEXPIRATIONDATE
THEREOF,THEISSUINGCOMPANYWILLMAILTEN(10)DAYSWRITTENNOTICETOTHEPARTIESTO
WHOMTHISCERTIFICATEISISSUED.
Datedat_____________________________On__________________________________
BY:_________________________________
AuthorizedInsuranceRepresentative
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
1
5F.ConsiderationofadoptingResolutionNo.2011-50acceptingquotesandawarding
contractforcompletingthesecondCommon-UseDumpsterEnclosureintheBlock
35MunicipalParkingLot,CityProjectNo.10C008.(BW)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilisbeingaskedtoadoptResolutionNo.2011-50acceptingquotesand
awardingacontracttoFullerConcreteandMasonryofMapleLaketoconstructthe
masonrywallsandgatesforthesecond(east)common-usedumpsterenclosureinthe
Block35MunicipalParkingLot.AsCouncilmayrecall,theeastdumpsterenclosure
wasonlypartiallyconstructedlastfallincludingthereinforcedconcretebaseslab,two
gateposts,andthreeprotectivebollardswereinstalledfortheeastenclosure.Thiswork
wascompletedbyFullerConcreteandMasonry.
Sincelastfall,sixofthenineprivatepropertyownersonBlock35haveexecuted
AssessmentAgreementswiththeCity,therebyagreeingtobeassessedforthecoststo
constructbothofthedumpsterenclosures.Thesesixparticipatingpropertyownersown
propertiesallaroundtheblocksobyconstructingtheseconddumpsterenclosurethe
propertyownersontheeastsideoftheblockwillhavemoreconvenientaccesstothe
enclosures,preventingthemfromneedingtowalkacrosstheentireparkinglottodispose
oftheirwasteandrecyclables.
Everypropertyownerwhowishestoparticipateinusingthedumpsterenclosuresisalso
requiredtoexecuteaLicenseAgreementwiththeCity.Thisagreementdefinestherights
andresponsibilitiesofboththeCityandthepropertyownersusingtheenclosures.
VeoliaEnvironmentalServicesisprovidingthewasteandrecyclinghaulingservicesfor
thedumpsterenclosures.Veoliaisbillingthepropertyownersdirectlyfortheirhauling
servicefees,whichareconsiderablylowerthanthefeesthepropertyownerswerepaying
previouslyfortheirindividualwastehaulingservices.
Theconcreteslab,walls,andgatesforthefirstdumpsterenclosurewereconstructedby
FullerConcreteandMasonrylastfall.Thenthisspring,PublicWorksstaffinstalledthe
roofsystemandinstalled4-digitchangeablecodelocksonthegates.
Onepropertyowneriscurrentlyusingtheexisting(west)enclosure,andtwootherswill
beusingitsoon.Theremainingthreeprivatepropertyownerswillbeginusingitonce
theyhaveexecutedtheirLicenseAgreementswiththeCityandhavemadearrangements
withVeoliatobebilledfortheirwastehaulingandrecyclingservices.Atthattimethey
willbeprovidedwiththecodetothelocksonthegates.
PerCouncilauthorization,staffsubmittedRequestsforQuotesforcompletingthesecond
dumpsterenclosuretothoselocalcontractorswhohadpreviouslysubmittedquotesfor
thefirstenclosure,orwhoexpressedaninterestinthislatestRequestforQuotes.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
2
OnlyFullerConcreteandMasonryprovidedaquote,whichisintheamountof$4,277.
Thisincludes$3,377tofurnishandinstallthemasonrywalls,and$900tofurnish,install
andpaintthesteelframed,woodslatgates.Fullerdidnotprovideaquoteforthesteel
roofsystem,indicatingthatthisquotewouldtakemuchefforttoprepareandknowing
thattheirpreviousquotewasrejectedinlieuofhavingCitystaffinstalltheroofthey
decidednottoprovideaquotefortheroof.Theyalsosaidthataquoteforaroofonthe
secondenclosurewouldbemuchgreaterthantheirpreviousquoteduetoreducingthe
roofpitchfroma4/12to2/12pitch.However,theysaidtheywouldbehappytoprovide
aquotefortheroofiftheCitychosenottoconstructtheroofusingCitystaff.
ItshouldbenotedthatFullerhadoriginallyquotedtheCityacostof$2,441tofurnish
andinstallaroofonthefirstenclosure.Thiswasbasedona4/12roofpitchwithno
overhang,48”rafterspacingsoncenter,and2x6treatedsillboards.ButthenCouncil
directedstafftoconstructtheroofusinga2/12pitchwhichresultedintheuseofa1’
overhang,16”rafterspacingsoncenter,and2x12treatedsillboards.TheCityspent
about$1,931.50onmaterialstoconstructtheroofforthefirstenclosure.
CouncilshouldbeawarethatPublicWorksstaffarecurrentlyverybusycompletingtheir
summerworktasks,soifCouncilwishestodirectthemtoconstructtheroofonthe
secondenclosure,similartothefirstenclosure,theymaynotbeabletodosountillate
summerorearlyfallwhichwillsignificantlydelaythepropertyownersfrombeingable
tousethesecondenclosure.
Councilshouldalsobeawarethatstaffisintheprocessofdevelopinglandscapingplans
fortheislandsintheBlock35parkinglot,includingtheislandareasaroundthedumpster
enclosures.TheplanswillbeconsistentwithCityordinanceforparkingareasandwill
includeamixtureoflowmaintenancematerials,includinghardsurfacing,arborvitae,
hardydecorativegrasses,anddaylilies.Costsforthelandscapingwillbepaidthrough
ParksDepartmentfunds.ThelandscapingwillbeinplacepriortoRiverFest.
AttachedassupportingdataisResolution2011-50andpicturesofthefirstenclosureand
whathasbeenconstructedofthesecondenclosuretodate.
A1.BudgetImpact:Thisworkwillbepaidforthroughassessmentstobenefitting
propertyowners,aswellasthroughtheuseofCityfunds.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffworkloadimpactswouldbeminimal.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2011-50acceptingquotesandawardingthe
contracttoFullerConcreteandMasonryofMapleLakeintheamountof$4,277
toconstructthemasonrywallsandgatesforthesecondCommon-UseDumpster
EnclosureintheBlock35MunicipalParkingLot,CityProjectNo.10C008,and
toauthorizestafftosolicitadditionalquotesforasteelroof.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
3
2.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2011-50acceptingquotesandawardingthe
contracttoFullerConcreteandMasonryofMapleLakeintheamountof$4,277
toconstructthemasonrywallsandgatesforthesecondCommon-UseDumpster
EnclosureintheBlock35MunicipalParkingLot,CityProjectNo.10C008,and
toauthorizestafftoconstructthesteelroofonthesecondenclosure,similartothe
roofonthefirstenclosure.
3.MotiondenyingadoptionofResolutionNo.2011-50atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1.Thecompletionofasecondcommon-
usedumpsterenclosurewouldgreatlybenefitthecurrentparticipantssinceseveralofthe
propertiesarelocatedontheveryeastsideoftheblockandmustthereforetransporttheir
wasteandrecyclablesacrosstheentireparkinglottoaccesstheexistingenclosure.And
sincetheAssessmentAgreementscoverthecostsforconstructingbothoftheenclosures
itwouldseemappropriatethatthesecondenclosureshouldbebuiltatthistime.Staff
alsobelievesitwouldbebesttosolicitquotesfortheroofwhichwouldallowittobe
constructedasquicklyaspossible.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
ResolutionNo.2011-50
Figure1-Picturesofeastdumpsterenclosure(1pg)
Figure2-Picturesofwestdumpsterenclosure(1pg)
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2011-50
ACCEPTINGQUOTESANDAWARDINGCONTRACTFORCOMPLETING
CONSTRUCTIONOFTHESECONDCOMMON-USEDUMPSTERENCLOSURE
INTHEBLOCK35MUNICIPALPARKINGLOT
CITYPROJECTNO.10C008
WHEREAS,pursuanttoamotionapprovedbytheCityCouncilonJuly26,2010,andon
September13,2010,theCityEngineerhaspreparedplansandspecificationsfortheBlock35
MunicipalParkingLotCommon-UseDumpsterEnclosuresandrelatedimprovements;and
WHEREAS,theCityEngineerhaspresentedsuchplansandspecificationstotheCouncilfor
considerationonOctober11,2010andcontinuedtoOctober25,2010forapproval;and
WHEREAS,theCityhassolicitedquotesforcompletingconstructionofthesecondCommon-
UseDumpsterEnclosureintheBlock35MunicipalParkingLotaccordingtotheplansand
specifications;quoteswerereceived,opened,andtabulated,andthefollowingquoteswerefound
tocomplywithsaidplansandspecifications:
CONTRACTORTOTALBASEQUOTE
FullerConcrete&Masonry$4,277.00
WHEREAS,thequotesubmittedbyFullerConcreteandMasonry,MapleLake,MNinthe
amountof$4,277.00forfurnishingandinstallingmasonryblockwallsandsteelframed,wood
slatgatesforsaidproject,inaccordancewiththeplansandspecifications,wasthelowest
responsiblequoteandshallbeandherebyisaccepted;and
WHEREAS,FullerConcreteandMasonry,MapleLake,MNwillberesponsibleforobtaining
allnecessarypermitsfromtheCityofMonticello,includingallassociatedcosts,priorto
constructingsaidimprovements;and
WHEREAS,propertyownerswithinBlock35oftheOriginalPlatintheCityofMonticellowho
signassessmentagreementsrelatedtosaidCommon-UseDumpsterEnclosureswillbeassessed
theirshareof100%ofthecostsoftheimprovements;and
WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellomayinstituteapilotprojectfornon-residentialtrash
collectioninBlock35oftheOriginalPlatforanybusinesseslocatedwithinthisblockand
participatingintheCommon-UseDumpsterEnclosures,CityProject10C008.
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1.Suchplansandspecifications,acopyofwhichisonfileintheofficeoftheCityClerk,
areherebyapproved.
2.Quotessubmittedfortheprojectaccordingtotheplansandspecificationsarehereby
accepted.
3.TheMayorandCityAdministratorareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoenterintoa
contractwithsaidcompany,representedbythelowquote,fortheconstructionofsaid
improvementsforandonbehalfoftheCityofMonticello.
4.TheCouncilauthorizestheroofofthedumpsterenclosuretobeconstructedbyPublic
Worksemployees.
5.Property/businessownersshallberesponsibleforcostsofwasteandrecyclingcollection
servicesandroutinemaintenanceofdumpsterenclosures.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis13th dayofJune,2011.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
1
5G.ConsiderationofapprovingwaiveroftheBuildingPlanCheckFeeforDLLK
Properties,LLCinaccordancewiththeBusinessExpansionIncentivePilotProgram
(MB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
Asyoumayrecall,inJanuaryof2011theCouncilauthorizedtheinitiationoftheBusiness
ExpansionIncentiveProgram.Theprogram’sprimarypurposewastoencouragethe
expansionandgrowthofexistingMonticellobusinesses.
TheCouncil’sauthorizationallowedforapilotprogramthatwouldrununtiltheendof2011.
Theapprovedprogramstructureallowedforapplicantstoreceiveupto$5,000inbuildingor
planningfeereductions.Theassistancewouldbeappliedonlytotheplanreviewcomponent
ofthebuildingpermitcost,planningapplication,ordemolitionpermits.
Toqualifyfortheprogram,applicantsneedtobeanexistingbusinessseekingtoexpandat
theircurrentlocationorexpandatanewlocationnMonticello.Theapplicantalsoneedsto
demonstrateanabilitytomeetatleasttwoofthefollowingcriteria:
1.Createorretainjobs.
2.Redevelopment,expansion,orrenewalofexistingvacantunderutilizedexisting
commercialorindustrialproperties/buildings,includingoneofthefollowing:
a)Increasebuildingsquarefootage
b)Increasebuildingvaluation
c)Increasedvisualappearanceorfunctionoffacility
d)Productorserviceexpansion
e)OccurswithintheCentralCommunityDistrict
CityStaffreceivedanapplicationfromDLLKProperties(MielkeDevelopment)requestingto
utilizethebusinessexpansionincentiveprogramtoreceiveawaiverofthebuildingpermit
planreviewfeeforthefirstphaseofthedevelopmentofLandmarkCenter.DLLKisinthe
processofconstructinga10,241squarefootmulti-tenantbuildingalongCedarStreet(by
ChelseaCommons,Subway,andJiffyLube)thatwillhousetheexistingMonticelloNAPA
andseveralotherretail/medicaltenants.UponrelocationtoLandmarkCenter,NAPAplansto
create1-2additionaljobs.Futureretail/medicaltenantswillalsocreateadditionalMonticello
jobs.
Theapplicantisintheprocessofsubmittingacompletedsetofbuildingpermitplans.
Therefore,theBuildingOfficialisunabletocalculatetheexactplanreviewfeeatthistime.
However,wedonotwanttoholdupthedeveloperfrommovingforwardwiththeirnew
constructionproject.Itisanticipatedtheplanreviewfeewillbecloseto$2,000forthe
constructionofthefirsttenant(NAPA).Additionalplanreviewwaiverrequestswillbe
submittedwhenfuturetenantbuild-outsoccur.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
2
A1.BudgetImpact:ThecurrentcashbalanceofthepilotprojectintheLiquorStore
Fundis$26,432.UponapprovalofthefirstphaseofDLLKproperties,LLC
application,thefundbalancewouldbecloseto$24,000.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffworkloadrequirementsconsistedofwritingthe
Councilstaffreport.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovewaivingtheapproximate$2,000dollarbuildingplanreviewfeeon
thebuildingpermitforDLLKPropertiesLLCPhase1constructionofLandmark
CenterNAPAbuild-outinaccordancewiththeBusinessExpansionIncentivePilot
Program.
2.Motiontodenybuildingplancheckfeewaiver.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.Theproposedprojectmeetstheobjectivesoftheapproved
BusinessExpansionIncentivePilotprogrambyaddingsquarefootage,creatingadditional
jobs,andincreasingbuildingvaluationinMonticello.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
BusinessExpansionIncentivePilotApplication–DLLKProperties,LLC
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
1
5H.ConsiderationofapprovingFinalStagePlannedUnitDevelopmentforLandmark
Center (AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
PlanningCommissionreviewedtheproposedfinalstagePUDplansduringtheir
regularmeetingonJune7th,2011andunanimouslyrecommendedapprovalofthe
changesasproposed,subjecttotheadditionofpilaster/columndetailontheeast
buildingfaçade.TheapplicantagreedwiththerecommendationoftheCommission
andindicatedagreementwithallotherconditionsasoutlinedinExhibitZ.
OnJune11th,2007,theCityCouncilapprovedanamendmenttoconditionalusepermit
fordevelopmentstagePlannedUnitDevelopmentforLandmarkCenter,aretailcomplex
withintheMonticelloTravelCenter2nd Addition.
TheCUPforPUDhasbeenextendedeachyearsincetheoriginalapproval.
Atthistime,thedeveloper,MielkeBros.LLC,ispreparingtomoveforwardwith
developmentofthesite.Inworkingwithtenantsforthebuilding,thedeveloperhas
indicatedthatthereisaneedforadjustmentstotheoriginallyapprovedsiteplanand
buildingelevationplan.
Astheprojecthasnotyetbeenconstructed,theapplicantbroughtforwardfinalstagesite
andarchitecturaldrawingsforreviewbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment,
consistentwiththeFinalStagePUDordinance.Staffbelievedthatthechangeswereof
significanceandrequestedthattheapplicantappearbeforethePlanningCommissionfor
FinalStagePUDreview.
Ifinreviewingtheproposedplans,theCommissionbelievesthatsuchchangeswarranta
hearingforamendmenttotheCUPfordevelopmentstagePUD,amotionhasbeen
providedforsuchprocess.
SitePlan
Theproposedsiteplanwouldaccommodatetheremovalofthedrivethroughalongthe
eastsideofthebuilding,aswellasaslightlylargerbuilding.Thesiteplanprovided
illustratesbothrevisions.Adetailedanalysisofothersiteplanimpactsisprovided
below.
Theapplicanthasindicatedthatanychangestothesite’sstormwaterpollution
preventionplan,gradinganddrainage,orutilityplansaretoaccommodatethelarger
buildingfootprint.Therefore,anyconditionsassignedtothoseplansundertheoriginal
approvalarestillapplicableandmaybesubjecttoadditionalcommentbytheCity
Engineer.
Theapplicantisproposingnochangestothelighting,landscapingoroverallsignage
plan,thereforeanyoriginallyassignedconditionsrelatedtothoseplansareapplicable.
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
2
Parking
Theoriginalapprovalwasforabuildingtotaling9.590squarefeetinarea.Thetotal
squarefootageofthebuildingasproposedisnow10,300squarefeet,asadditionof710
squarefeet.UnderthepreviousPUDapproval,59parkingstallswereprovided.The
PUDincludedacross-easementagreementrequirementforbothparkingandaccessto
accommodatesharedparkingthroughoutthePUD.
Therevisedplannowillustrates56spaces,anetlossof3spacestothePUD.However,
despitetheadditionalsquarefootage,theparkingrequiredforthisspecificsiteactually
comesclosertomeetingcoderequirementsasopposedtotheshortageundertheoriginal
plan.Thisisduetotheusersproposedunderthisfinalstageplan,Theretailautomotive
userhasalargeareadevotedtowarehousespace,whichreducestheparkingrequirement
forthesite.However,thecross-easementforparkingandaccessmustremaininplaceto
accommodatepotentialfuturechangesinuseforthetenantswithinthebuildings.
Access&Circulation/OffStreet-Loading
Asnotedabove,across-easementforaccesswasrequiredasaconditionoftheprevious
PUDapprovalandcontinuesforwardasarequirementundertheFinalStagePUD.
AccesstothesitecontinuestobeprovidedthroughtwoexistingcurbcutsatCedarStreet.
However,intherevisedsiteplan,oneofthetwopreviouslyapproveddrive-throughshas
beenremoved.
Previously,a16.24’one-waydriveaislewasshowndirectlyadjacenttoa12’drive-thru
laneontheeastsideoftheproperty,parallelingCedarStreet.Thenewsiteplan,
accommodatingtheslightlylargerbuilding,nowincludesadedicatedoff-streetloading
areaforsemi-trailertrafficandaccommodatesadriveaislefortheparkinglocatedalong
theeastsideoftheproperty.Theoff-streetloadinganddrive-aisleis27.45’inwidthat
thenorthentrancetotheone-wayaisle,narrowingto17.71atthesouth.Thedrive-
throughshownalongthenorthsideofthepropertyremainsunchangedinwidth,at12’.
Withtherevisedplan,theapplicantisrequestedtoprovideturningtemplatesfortruck
trafficenteringandexitingthisarea,aswellasapavementstriping/paintingplanforthe
one-wayareas.
Itshouldbenotedthatthereareadditionalscreeningrequirementsforoff-streetloading
areasincommercialdistrictsbeyondthepreviouslyapprovedlandscapingplan.
However,off-streetloadingwasnotspecificallyaddressedinthepreviousreportandno
mentionofscreeningbeyondtheapprovedlandscapingplanwasrequiredwiththe
originalPUD.Theoff-streetloadingareaparallelsCedarStreetandundertheapproved
landscapingplanisproposedtoincludeamixofornamentaltreesandshrubs.
Theapplicantwillberequiredtoclarifythedurationandvolumeofexpectedsemi-trailer
trafficutilizingthisloadingarea.Asaconditionofapproval,nosemi-trailerswillbe
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
3
allowedtoremainon-siteforlongerthana24hourperiod,consistentwithregulationsfor
thetemporarynatureoff-streetloading..
Withtheadditionofclarificationontheintensityofoff-streetloadingactivities,staff
believesthattheeliminationofthedrive-throughontheeastsideofthepropertyisan
improvementtotheoriginalPUD.
BuildingElevations
Theapplicantisproposingrevisionstothepreviouslyapprovedbuildingelevations.
Thechangesincludeacurvedrooflineonthesouthandeastfacadesofthebuilding.
Materialfinishesforthebuildingremainconsistentwiththeoriginalapproval.The
buildingwillbeconstructedmainlyofEIFSblockwithmasonrywallbaseandpre-
finishedmetalcoping.Therevisedplansdorepresentcolorvariationfromtheoriginal
approval.
Theeastfaçadeproposeddoesshowlessbuildingdetailthanpreviouslyapproved.As
thisfaçadehasveryvisibleexposuretoCedarStreet,itisrecommendedthattheapplicant
provideadditionalbuildingdetail,suchaspilasters,falsewindows,orotherwallplane
break-upontheeastwallfacingCedarStreet,consistentwiththeoriginalapproval.
Lighting
Theapplicanthasproposedtheadditionofanarchitecturallightbaralongthetenant
spacelocatedonthesouthandeastfacadesofthebuilding.Thecodedoesmakean
allowanceforarchitecturallightingelements,butrequiresthattheybelow-level
illumination,notexceeding60wattsor100lumens.Aspecificfixturedetailwillbe
requiredforthischangeatbuildingpermitandanychangetotheapprovedphotometric
planwillalsorequirerevision.Asanadditionalnote,allcommercialpropertiesare
requiredtoshutofflightingwithinonehourofbusinessclose.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapprovetheFinalStagePUDforLandmarkCenter,aportionof
MonticelloTravelCenter2nd Addition,subjecttoalloriginalconditionsofthe
6/11/07approval,andthoseconditionslistedinExhibitZ.
2.MotiontorequiretheapplicanttoapplyforanamendmenttoCUPfor
developmentstagePUDforMonticelloTravelCenter2nd Addition.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1above.PlanningCommissionunanimously
recommendsAlternative#1.Withcommentsasnoted,staffbelievesthechanges
presentedaregenerallyconsistentwiththenatureandscopeoftheoriginalPUD.Staff
recommendsapprovaloftheFinalStagePUDsubjecttotheconditionsnotedandthose
directedbythePlanningCommission.
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
4
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.RevisedSitePlan
a.SitePlan/CertificateofSurvey
b.Grading,Drainage&Erosion
c.Utilities
d.SWWPP
e.Detail
B.RevisedBuildingElevations
a.ColoredElevations,East&North
b.ColoredElevations,South&West
c.BuildingMaterials,Signage
C.ApprovedPlans6/11/07
a.SitePlan
b.BuildingElevations
D.PlanningCommissionAgenda,6/07/11
E.CityCouncilAgenda&Minutes,6/11/07
Z.ConditionsofApproval
Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11
1
9. Consideration of a Final Stage PUD for Landmark Center (AS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
On June 11th, 2007, the City Council approved an amendment to conditional use permit for
development stage Planned Unit Development for Landmark Center, a retail complex within
the Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition.
The CUP for PUD has been extended each year since the original approval.
At this time, the developer, Mielke Bros. LLC, is preparing to move forward with
development of the site.
In working with tenants for the building, the developer has indicated that there is a need for
adjustments to the originally approved site plan and building elevation plan. No changes are
proposed to the site’s signage, grading and drainage, or utility plans. Therefore, any
conditions assigned to those plans under the original approval are still applicable.
As the project has not yet been constructed, the applicant brought forward final stage site and
architectural drawings for review by the Community Development Department, consistent
with the Final Stage PUD ordinance. Staff believed that the changes were of significance and
requested that the applicant appear before the Planning Commission for Final Stage PUD
review.
If in reviewing the proposed plans, the Commission believes that such changes warrant a
hearing for amendment to the CUP for development stage PUD, a motion has been provided
for such process.
Site Plan
The proposed site plan would accommodate the removal of the drive through along the east
side of the building, as well as a slightly larger building. The site plan provided illustrates
both revisions. A detailed analysis of other site plan impacts is provided below.
Parking
The original approval was for a building totaling 9.590 square feet in area. The total square
footage of the building as proposed is now 10,300 square feet, as addition of 710 square feet.
Under the previous PUD approval, 59 parking stalls were provided. The PUD included a
cross-easement agreement requirement for both parking and access to accommodate shared
parking throughout the PUD.
The revised plan now illustrates 56 spaces, a net loss of 3 spaces to the PUD. However,
despite the additional square footage, the parking required for this specific site actually comes
closer to meeting code requirements as opposed to the shortage under the original plan. This
is due to the users proposed under this final stage plan, The retail automotive user has a large
area devoted to warehouse space, which reduces the parking requirement for the site.
Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11
2
However, the cross-easement for parking and access must remain in place to accommodate
potential future changes in use for the tenants within the buildings.
Access & Circulation/Off Street-Loading
As noted above, a cross-easement for access was required as a condition of the previous PUD
approval and continues forward as a requirement under the Final Stage PUD.
Access to the site continues to be provided through two existing curb cuts at Cedar Street.
However, in the revised site plan, one of the two previously approved drive-throughs has been
removed.
Previously, a 16.24’ one-way drive aisle was shown directly adjacent to a 12’ drive-thru lane
on the east side of the property, paralleling Cedar Street. The new site plan, accommodating
the slightly larger building, now includes a dedicated off-street loading area for semi-trailer
traffic and accommodates a drive aisle for the parking located along the east side of the
property. The off-street loading and drive-aisle is 27.45’ in width at the north entrance to the
one-way aisle, narrowing to 17.71 at the south. The drive-through shown along the north side
of the property remains unchanged in width, at 12’.
With the revised plan, the applicant is requested to provide turning templates for truck traffic
entering and exiting this area, as well as a pavement striping/painting plan for the one-way
areas.
It should be noted that there are additional screening requirements for off-street loading areas
in commercial districts beyond the previously approved landscaping plan. However, off-
street loading was not specifically addressed in the previous report and no mention of
screening beyond the approved landscaping plan was required with the original PUD. The
off-street loading area parallels Cedar Street and under the approved landscaping plan is
proposed to include a mix of ornamental trees and shrubs.
The applicant will be required to clarify the duration and volume of expected semi-trailer
traffic utilizing this loading area. As a condition of approval, no semi-trailers will be allowed
to remain on-site for longer than a 24 hour period, consistent with regulations for the
temporary nature off-street loading..
With the addition of clarification on the intensity of off-street loading activities, staff believes
that the elimination of the drive-through on the east side of the property is an improvement to
the original PUD.
Building Elevations
The applicant is proposing revisions to the previously approved building elevations. The
changes include a curved roofline on the south and east facades of the building. Material
finishes for the building remain consistent with the original approval. The building will be
constructed mainly of EIFS block with masonry wall base and pre-finished metal coping. The
revised plans do represent color variation from the original approval.
Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11
3
Lighting
The applicant has proposed the addition of an architectural light bar along the tenant space
located on the south and east facades of the building. The code does make an allowance for
architectural lighting elements, but requires that they be low-level illumination, not exceeding
60 watts or 100 lumens. A specific fixture detail will be required for this change at building
permit and any change to the approved photometric plan will also require revision. As an
additional note, all commercial properties are required to shut off lighting within one hour of
business close.
If approved, this item will be placed on the consent agenda of the City Council.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the Final Stage PUD for Landmark Center, a portion of Monticello
Travel Center 2nd Addition, subject to all original conditions of the 6/11/07 approval,
and those conditions listed in Exhibit Z.
2. Motion to require the applicant to apply for an amendment to CUP for development
stage PUD for Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition.
2. Motion of other.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends Alternative #1 above. With comments as noted, staff believes the
changes presented are generally consistent with the nature and scope of the original PUD.
Staff recommends approval of the Final Stage PUD subject to the conditions noted and those
directed by the Planning Commission.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Revised Site Plan
B. Revised Building Elevations
C. Approved Plans 6/11/07
D. Staff Report, City Council Agenda
E. Development and Final Stage PUD Ordinance
Z. Conditions of Approval
Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11
4
EXHIBIT Z
Conditions of Approval
Final Stage PUD
Landmark Center – Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition
1. The applicant clarify the intensity of off-street loading activities to the satisfaction of the City.
2. No semi-trailers will be allowed to remain on-site for longer than a 24 hour period, consistent
with regulations for the temporary nature off-street loading.
3. The applicant is to provide turning templates for truck traffic entering and exiting the site with
building permit.
4. The applicant is to supply a pavement striping/painting plan for the one-way areas with
building permit.
5. A cross-easement for parking and access must remain in place to accommodate potential
future changes in use for the tenants within the buildings.
6. Specific lighting fixture detail will be required for all architectural lighting elements, which
must not exceeding 60 watts or 100 lumens.
7. All conditions assigned under the June 11th, 2007 approval shall be applicable.
EXHIBITZ
ConditionsofApproval
FinalStagePUD
LandmarkCenter–MonticelloTravelCenter2nd Addition
1.Theapplicantistoclarifytheintensityofoff-streetloadingactivitiestothesatisfactionof
theCity.
2.Nosemi-trailerswillbeallowedtoremainon-siteforlongerthana24hourperiod,
consistentwithregulationsforthetemporarynatureoff-streetloading.
3.Theapplicantistoprovideturningtemplatesfortrucktrafficenteringandexitingthesite
withbuildingpermit.
4.Theapplicantistoprovideadditionaldetail(pilasters,falsewindows,planebreak-up)on
theeastwallfacingCedarStreet,consistentwiththeoriginalapproval.
5.Theapplicantistosupplyapavementstriping/paintingplanfortheone-wayareaswith
buildingpermit.
6.Across-easementforparkingandaccessmustremaininplacetoaccommodatepotential
futurechangesinuseforthetenantswithinthebuildings.
7.Specificlightingfixturedetailwillberequiredforallarchitecturallightingelements,
whichmustnotexceeding60wattsor100lumens.
8.CompliancewiththecommentsbytheCityEngineerontheGrading,Drainage&
ErosionControl,UtilityandSWPPPPlans.
9.AllconditionsassignedundertheJune11th,2007approvalshallbeapplicable.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
1
7.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-49acceptingbidsandawarding
contractfor2011StreetReconstruction,CityProjectNo.11C001 (BW/WSB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
OnApril25,2011,CouncilapprovedfinalPlansandSpecificationsandauthorized
advertisementofbidsforthe2011StreetReconstructionproject,CityProjectNo.
11C001,whichincludesArea4B(EastRiverStreet),WestRiverStreetfromCSAH75to
theXcelballfields,andintersectionimprovementsatWest7th StreetandWalnutStreet,
aswellasthreealternatebidstoextendasanitaryservicetoEllisonPark(Alternate#1),
toreconstructtheEastBridgeParkparkinglot(Alternate#2),andtoreconstructthe
EllisonParkparkinglot,internaldriveandboatlaunchaccessdrive(Alternate#3).
Thestreetsidentifiedforreconstructionandotherimprovementswiththisproject
include:
Area4B(EastRiverStreet)
EastRiverStreet–CedarStreetto+/-1,100’eastofWashingtonStreet
CedarStreet–EastBroadway(CSAH75)toEastRiverStreetandsidewalk
extension
PalmStreet–EastBroadway(CSAH75)toEastRiverStreet
NewStreet–EastBroadway(CSAH75)toEastRiverStreet
WrightStreet–EastBroadway(CSAH75)toEastRiverStreet
RamseyStreet–EastBroadway(CSAH75)toEastRiverStreet
HennepinStreet–EastBroadway(CSAH75)toEastRiverStreet
WashingtonStreet–EastBroadway(CSAH75)topublicaccess/parkentrance
EllisonPark–Parkinglot,internaldrive,andboatlaunchaccessdrive,andsewer
(andwater*)service(s)
EastBridgePark–parkinglotreconstruction
WestRiverStreet
WestRiverStreet–WestBroadway(CSAH75)toXcelballfieldsentrance
7th StreetandWalnutStreetIntersectionImprovements
Turnlaneandpedestriancrossingimprovements
Millandoverlay7th StreetfromWalnutStreettoapproximately100feetwestof
LocustStreet
BidsfortheprojectwerereceivedandopenedonThursday,June2,2011.TheCity
received4bids,whichwereverycompetitive,withRedstoneConstructionCompanyInc.
submittingthelowbidforthisprojectasdeterminedbytheBaseBid or bytheBaseBid
plusallAlternateBids.
Redstone’sbidsfortheBaseBidandthreeAlternateBidsaresummarizedbelow.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
2
Engineer’s
Estimate
Redstone
Construction
Company,Inc.
BaseBid $1,897.531.00$1,740,484.38
Alternate#1
EllisonParkSanitarySewerService
$14,587.00$11,846.99
Alternate#2
EastBridgeParkingLot
$12,611.25$18,004.12
Alternate#3
EllisonParkParkingLot
$74,825.75$79,677.89
Total–BaseBidplusAlternates1,2&3 $1,999,555.00$1,850,013.38
BASEBID:IncludesstreetandutilityimprovementstoArea4Bincludingimprovements
relatedtopavement,curbandgutter,stormsewer,sanitarysewer,watermain,andother
appurtenantwork.ThebasebidalsoincludesstreetandutilityimprovementstoWest
RiverStreetfromCSAH75totheXcelballfields,andtheintersectionimprovementsat
West7th StreetandWalnutStreet.
ALTERNATE#1:ExtensionofasanitarysewerservicewithinEllisonParktoservea
futureconcessionareanearthelogshelterwithinthepark.Extensionofawaterservice
wasnotbidwiththisalternate,howevercouldbeaddedtotheprojectatanestimatedcost
of$8,000.
ALTERNATE#2:ReconstructionoftheEastBridgeParkparkinglot.
ALTERNATE#3:ReconstructionoftheEllisonParkparkinglot,internaldrive,and
boatlaunchaccessdrive.
Asummaryofthebidsreceivedisattached.RedstoneConstructionisthelowbid
contractorregardlessofwhichalternateimprovement(s)theCityCouncilchoosesin
additiontothebasebid.Adetailedbreakdownofallthecontractorsbidforthebasebid
pluseachalternatebidisalsoattached.
A1.BudgetImpact:Theprojectisproposedtobefundedusingamixoffunding
includingstreetreconstructionfunds,utilityoperatingfunds,StateAidfunds,andspecial
assessmentstobenefittingproperties.Thefollowingisasummaryoftheprojectcostsfor
eachimprovement,whichincludes22%forindirectcosts.
$1,722,972–Area4B
$295,170–WestRiverStreet
$105,249–7th/WalnutStreetIntersection
$14,453–AlternateBid#1-EllisonParksewerservice*
$21,964–AlternateBid#2-EastBridgePark-parkinglot
$97,207–AlternateBid#3-EllisonParkparkinglot
$2,257,014–Total
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
3
*Councilshouldnotethatstaffestimatesitwillcostanadditional$8,000to
extendawaterserviceintoEllisonParktocomplementthesanitarysewer
servicecoveredunderAlternateBid#1.Awaterservicewasintendedtobe
includedunderAlternateBid#1butwasinadvertentlyomitted.IfCouncil
wishestoauthorizetheinstallationofthiswaterservice,whichwillbeneededto
complementthesanitarysewerservicetoservethesiteinthefuture,then
AlternativeAction#1shouldbeapproved.IfCouncildoesnot wishtoinstallthe
waterserviceatthistimethenAlternativeAction2shouldbeapproved.Staff
recommendsinstallingthewaterserviceatthistimesincetheworkcanbedone
mostcost-effectivelyduringtheinstallationofthesanitaryservice.
Approximately$608,564oftheprojectcostsareeligibletoreceiveStateAidfunds.This
amountincludestheeligibleconstructionamountplus22%forengineeringfees.As
Councilisaware,thereisthepotentialforagovernmentshutdownonJuly1st,2011.
DuringtheshutdowncitieswillnotbeabletorequestStateAidfundpaymentsfor
constructionorengineeringwork.However,theCitycanrequest95%oftheeligible
constructioncontractamountandengineeringcostsaslongasitisrequestedpriortoJuly
1st.CitystaffplanstorequesttheStateAidpaymentimmediatelyafterCouncilawards
theprojecttoensurethesefundsarereceived.
ItshouldbenotedthatBNSFrailroadestimatesthecostfortherailroadcrossingsurface
materialforWestRiverStreettobe$20,000.Thiswillbethesamerubber-typematerial
installedonPrairieRoadlastyear.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:EngineeringandPublicWorksstaffspentaconsiderable
amountoftimeworkingwithWSBandAssociatestoprepareplansandspecificationsfor
thisproject,andstaffwillcontinuespendingafairamountoftimeontheprojectduring
itsconstruction.WSBandAssociatespreparedplansandspecificationsandwillprovide
overallprojectmanagementservices,whileCitystaffwillprovideprimaryconstruction
inspectionandsomeprojectadministrationduties.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-49awardingthecontracttothelowestresponsible
bidder,RedstoneConstructionCompanyofMora,MN,fortheBaseBidplus
AlternateBids#1,#2and#3,andtoaddawaterservicetoEllisonPark.
2.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-49awardingthecontracttothelowestresponsible
bidder,RedstoneConstructionCompanyofMora,MN,fortheBaseBidplus
AlternateBids#1,#2and#3.
3.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-49awardingthecontracttothelowestresponsible
bidder,RedstoneConstructionCompanyofMora,MN,fortheBaseBidplus
Alternate(s)_______.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
4
4.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2011-49andnotawardacontractatthis
time.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternate#1forthereasonsnoted.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2011-49
BidSummary&Tabulation
LetterofRecommendation
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2011-49
ACCEPTINGBIDSANDAWARDINGCONTRACTFOR2011STREET
RECONSTRUCTION–AREA4B(EASTRIVERSTREET),WESTRIVERSTREET
ANDWALNUTSTREET/7TH STREETWESTINTERSECTIONIMPROVEMENTS
CITYPROJECTNO.11C001
WHEREAS,pursuanttoanadvertisementforbidsforthemakingofimprovementstostreetsin
Area4AandPrairieRoadincludingutilityanddrainageimprovements,streetreconstruction,and
othernecessaryappurtenantwork,bidswerereceived,opened,andtabulated,andthefollowing
bidswerefoundtocomplywiththeadvertisementforbids:
CONTRACTORTOTALBASEBIDTOTALBASEBID
W/ALTERNATES
BurschvilleConstruction,Inc.$2,020,132.45$2,126,548.55
Hardrives,Inc.$1,785,069.14$1,899,295.24
R.L.LarsonExcavating,Inc.$1,885,963.50$1,996,424.50
RedstoneConstructionCompany,Inc.$1,740,484.38$1,850,013.38
Engineer’sEstimate$1,897,531.00$1,999,555.00
WHEREAS,thebidofRedstoneConstructionCompanyofMora,MNintheamountof
$1,850,013.38forthetotalbasebidwithCityCouncilapprovedalternatesfortheconstructionof
saidimprovements,inaccordancewiththeapprovedplansandspecificationsandadvertisement
forbids,isthelowestresponsiblebidderandshallbeandherebyisaccepted,and
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHE
CITYOFMONTICELLO:
1.TheMayorandCityAdministratorareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoenterintoa
contractwithsaidbidderfortheconstructionofsaidimprovementsforandonbehalfof
theCityofMonticello.
2.TheCityAdministratorisherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoreturnforthwithtoall
biddersthedepositsmadewiththeirbids,exceptthatthedepositofthesuccessfulbidder
andthenextlowestbiddershallberetaineduntilacontracthasbeenexecuted.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis13th dayofJune,2011.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
____________________________________
ATTEST:ClintHerbst,Mayor
_______________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
Project: 2011 Street Reconstruction Program
Location: Monticello, Minnesota
City Project No. 11C001
S.A.P. 222-101-006 / S.A.P. 222-112-002
S.A.P. 222-113-001 / S.A.P. 222-121-001
WSB Project No. 1494-42
Date:June 2, 2011, 2:00 p.m.
Contractor Bid Security Addendum 1
Total Base Bid
(Schedules A-F)
Alternate 1
(Schedule G)
Ellison Park Santiary
Service
Alternate 2
(Schedule H)
East Bridge Park
Parking Lot
Alternate 3
(Schedule I)
Ellison Park Parking
Lot
Total Base Bid
Plus Alternates
1 Redstone Construction X Yes $1,740,484.38 $11,846.99 $18,004.12 $79,677.89 $1,850,013.38
2 Hardrives, Inc.X Yes $1,785,069.14 $9,468.83 $19,983.92 $84,873.35 $1,899,295.24
3 R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc.X Yes $1,885,963.50 $10,496.00 $19,224.00 $80,751.00 $1,996,434.50
4 Burschville Construction, Inc.X Yes $2,020,132.45 $10,453.55 $19,039.50 $76,923.05 $2,126,548.55
Engineer's Estimate $1,897,531.00 $14,587.00 $12,611.25 $74,825.75 $1,999,555.00
Denotes corrected figure
Shibani Bisson, PE, Project Manager
BID TABULATION SUMMARY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on June 2, 2011.
6/6/2011
WS
B
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
:
MO
N
T
- 2
0
1
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
N
o
.
:
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Ci
t
y
o
f
M
o
n
t
i
c
e
l
l
o
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
:
0
1
4
9
4
-42
Bi
d
O
p
e
n
i
n
g
:
6/
3
/
2
0
1
1
2
:
0
0
P
M
Ow
n
e
r
:
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Re
d
s
t
o
n
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
R
o
g
e
r
s
)
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Unit Price Total Price
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
1
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$3
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$25,000.00$100,000.00$100,000.00
2
21
0
1
.
5
0
1
CL
E
A
R
I
N
G
AC
R
E
0.
1
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$6
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
,
9
5
9
.
6
0
$695.96$10,000.00$1,000.00
3
21
0
1
.
5
0
2
CL
E
A
R
I
N
G
TR
E
E
20
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
6
0
.
6
1
$3,212.20$150.00$3,000.00
4
21
0
1
.
5
0
6
GR
U
B
B
I
N
G
AC
R
E
0.
1
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
2
1
.
2
0
$32.12$6,000.00$600.00
5
21
0
1
.
5
0
7
GR
U
B
B
I
N
G
TR
E
E
20
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
3
3
.
8
4
$2,676.80$150.00$3,000.00
6
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
C
U
R
B
A
N
D
G
U
T
T
E
R
LI
N
F
T
53
2
0
$3
.
5
0
$1
8
,
6
2
0
.
0
0
$2
.
3
5
$1
2
,
5
0
2
.
0
0
$3
.
2
1
$17,077.20$3.00$15,960.00
7
21
0
4
.
5
0
3
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
68
0
$0
.
7
5
$5
1
0
.
0
0
$0
.
2
8
$1
9
0
.
4
0
$1
.
8
2
$1,237.60$1.75$1,190.00
8
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
60
6
$6
.
5
0
$3
,
9
3
9
.
0
0
$2
.
2
5
$1
,
3
6
3
.
5
0
$1
.
8
2
$1,102.92$1.75$1,060.50
9
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
48
8
$2
.
5
0
$1
,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$2
.
1
0
$1
,
0
2
4
.
8
0
$3
.
9
0
$1,903.20$1.75$854.00
10
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
26
0
$2
.
5
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$1
.
7
5
$4
5
5
.
0
0
$3
.
9
0
$1,014.00$1.75$455.00
11
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
SQ
Y
D
45
$8
.
5
0
$3
8
2
.
5
0
$2
.
3
5
$1
0
5
.
7
5
$2
.
4
1
$108.45$2.50$112.50
12
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
S
I
G
N
EA
C
H
10
$3
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$4
0
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$2
6
.
7
7
$267.70$40.00$400.00
13
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
EA
C
H
41
$2
0
.
0
0
$8
2
0
.
0
0
$1
5
.
0
0
$6
1
5
.
0
0
$5
.
3
5
$219.35$40.00$1,640.00
14
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
EA
C
H
41
$1
0
.
0
0
$4
1
0
.
0
0
$5
.
0
0
$2
0
5
.
0
0
$1
6
.
0
6
$658.46$20.00$820.00
15
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
EA
C
H
26
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
9
.
0
0
$4
,
1
3
4
.
0
0
$1
7
0
.
2
4
$4,426.24$150.00$3,900.00
16
21
0
4
.
5
1
1
SA
W
I
N
G
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
(
F
U
L
L
D
E
P
T
H
)
LI
N
F
T
21
6
$4
.
5
0
$9
7
2
.
0
0
$3
.
2
5
$7
0
2
.
0
0
$6
.
4
2
$1,386.72$5.00$1,080.00
17
21
0
4
.
5
1
3
SA
W
I
N
G
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
(
F
U
L
L
D
E
P
T
H
)
LI
N
F
T
34
9
$2
.
5
0
$8
7
2
.
5
0
$2
.
8
5
$9
9
4
.
6
5
$3
.
0
5
$1,064.45$3.00$1,047.00
18
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
16
6
4
0
$6
.
0
0
$9
9
,
8
4
0
.
0
0
$4
.
8
5
$8
0
,
7
0
4
.
0
0
$6
.
8
0
$1
1
3
,
1
5
2
.
0
0
$6.50$108,160.00
19
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
31
9
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$4
.
7
5
$1
5
,
1
5
2
.
5
0
$6
.
8
0
$21,692.00$6.50$20,735.00
20
21
0
5
.
5
2
2
SE
L
E
C
T
G
R
A
N
U
L
A
R
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
12
5
7
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
2
5
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$8
.
8
5
$1
1
1
,
2
4
4
.
5
0
$5
.
3
5
$67,249.50$5.10$64,107.00
21
21
0
5
.
5
2
5
TO
P
S
O
I
L
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
85
6
$1
0
.
0
0
$8
,
5
6
0
.
0
0
$9
.
7
5
$8
,
3
4
6
.
0
0
$1
3
.
9
2
$11,915.52$14.00$11,984.00
22
21
1
2
.
5
0
1
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
RO
A
D
S
T
A
62
.
7
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$9
,
4
0
5
.
0
0
$4
5
.
0
0
$2
,
8
2
1
.
5
0
$4
8
.
1
8
$3,020.89$120.00$7,524.00
23
21
1
2
.
6
0
4
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
69
$1
.
0
0
$6
9
.
0
0
$2
.
2
5
$1
5
5
.
2
5
$2
.
1
4
$147.66$5.00$345.00
24
21
2
3
.
6
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
S
W
E
E
P
E
R
(
W
I
T
H
P
I
C
K
U
P
B
R
O
O
M
)
HO
U
R
67
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$8
,
3
7
5
.
0
0
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$8
,
3
7
5
.
0
0
$1
4
3
.
1
3
$9,589.71$110.00$7,370.00Page 1of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Re
d
s
t
o
n
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
R
o
g
e
r
s
)
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price Unit PriceTotal Price
25
21
3
0
.
5
0
1
WA
T
E
R
M
G
A
L
L
O
N
S
13
6
$3
0
.
0
0
$4
,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$2
5
.
0
0
$3
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$2
6
.
7
7
$3,640.72$35.00$4,760.00
26
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
98
7
0
$1
2
.
0
0
$1
1
8
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$1
3
.
2
1
$1
3
0
,
3
8
2
.
7
0
$1
2
.
1
9
$120,315.30$7.00$69,090.00
27
23
0
1
.
6
0
3
MU
D
J
A
C
K
I
N
G
(
C
U
R
B
)
LI
N
F
T
34
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$3
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
.
0
0
$5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$6
.
1
6
$2,094.40$10.00$3,400.00
28
23
3
1
.
6
0
4
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
R
E
C
L
A
M
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
25
2
0
0
$2
.
5
0
$6
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
.
8
5
$4
6
,
6
2
0
.
0
0
$1
.
9
8
$49,896.00$1.50$37,800.00
29
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
12
7
8
$2
.
5
0
$3
,
1
9
5
.
0
0
$2
.
5
8
$3
,
2
9
7
.
2
4
$2
.
5
7
$3,284.46$2.50$3,195.00
30
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
23
8
0
$5
3
.
0
0
$1
2
6
,
1
4
0
.
0
0
$5
3
.
5
0
$1
2
7
,
3
3
0
.
0
0
$5
2
.
7
1
$125,449.80$62.00$147,560.00
31
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
1
2
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
31
2
0
$4
8
.
0
0
$1
4
9
,
7
6
0
.
0
0
$4
9
.
0
0
$1
5
2
,
8
8
0
.
0
0
$4
8
.
5
0
$151,320.00$52.00$162,240.00
32
23
6
0
.
5
0
3
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
3
.
0
"
T
H
I
C
K
SQ
Y
D
40
8
$2
5
.
0
0
$1
0
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
.
6
2
$6
,
3
7
2
.
9
6
$1
5
.
5
9
$6,360.72$20.00$8,160.00
33
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
)
EA
C
H
5
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
4
0
.
0
0
$1
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$3
6
4
.
0
4
$1,820.20$250.00$1,250.00
34
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
)
EA
C
H
2
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$6
8
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$7
2
8
.
0
9
$1,456.18$250.00$500.00
35
25
2
1
.
5
0
1
4"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
44
0
0
$3
.
5
0
$1
5
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
2
5
$1
4
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
8
5
$16,940.00$3.25$14,300.00
36
25
3
1
.
5
0
1
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
B
6
1
8
LI
N
F
T
53
2
0
$1
0
.
5
0
$5
5
,
8
6
0
.
0
0
$1
0
.
8
5
$5
7
,
7
2
2
.
0
0
$1
0
.
3
9
$55,274.80$15.00$79,800.00
37
25
3
1
.
5
0
7
6"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
39
4
$4
0
.
0
0
$1
5
,
7
6
0
.
0
0
$4
0
.
9
5
$1
6
,
1
3
4
.
3
0
$4
2
.
8
3
$16,875.02$36.00$14,184.00
38
25
3
1
.
5
0
7
7"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
6
$4
5
.
0
0
$2
7
0
.
0
0
$4
8
.
0
0
$2
8
8
.
0
0
$5
3
.
5
4
$321.24$60.00$360.00
39
25
3
1
.
5
0
7
6"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
H
E
SQ
Y
D
39
4
$4
2
.
0
0
$1
6
,
5
4
8
.
0
0
$4
3
.
2
0
$1
7
,
0
2
0
.
8
0
$4
4
.
9
7
$17,718.18$38.00$14,972.00
40
25
3
1
.
5
0
7
7"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
H
E
SQ
Y
D
6
$4
7
.
0
0
$2
8
2
.
0
0
$5
0
.
5
0
$3
0
3
.
0
0
$5
5
.
6
8
$334.08$62.00$372.00
41
25
3
1
.
6
0
2
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
C
U
R
B
R
A
M
P
EA
C
H
5
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$2
1
5
.
0
0
$1
,
0
7
5
.
0
0
$2
4
6
.
2
6
$1,231.30$250.00$1,250.00
42
25
3
1
.
6
0
4
7"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
SQ
Y
D
45
$5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$5
1
.
7
5
$2
,
3
2
8
.
7
5
$6
7
.
4
5
$3,035.25$50.00$2,250.00
43
25
3
1
.
6
1
8
TR
U
N
C
A
T
E
D
D
O
M
E
S
SQ
F
T
48
$3
5
.
0
0
$1
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$3
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$2
9
.
9
8
$1,439.04$35.00$1,680.00
44
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
IN
S
T
A
L
L
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
(
C
L
U
S
T
E
R
)
EA
C
H
20
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$7
6
.
0
0
$1
,
5
2
0
.
0
0
$8
1
.
3
7
$1,627.40$100.00$2,000.00
45
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
MA
I
L
B
O
X
EA
C
H
67
$4
0
.
0
0
$2
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$7
6
.
0
0
$5
,
0
9
2
.
0
0
$2
1
.
4
1
$1,434.47$25.00$1,675.00
46
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
MA
I
L
B
O
X
(
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
)
EA
C
H
67
$3
5
.
0
0
$2
,
3
4
5
.
0
0
$5
.
0
0
$3
3
5
.
0
0
$4
.
8
0
$321.60$10.00$670.00
47
25
6
3
.
6
0
1
TR
A
F
F
I
C
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$9
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$9
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$9
,
6
3
6
.
3
2
$9,636.32$6,000.00$6,000.00
48
25
6
4
.
5
3
1
SI
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
S
T
Y
P
E
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
SQ
F
T
20
$3
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$2
9
.
5
0
$5
9
0
.
0
0
$3
1
.
5
9
$631.80$30.00$600.00
49
25
6
4
.
5
3
1
F&
I
S
I
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
S
T
Y
P
E
C
SQ
F
T
15
1
$3
0
.
0
0
$4
,
5
3
0
.
0
0
$3
2
.
5
0
$4
,
9
0
7
.
5
0
$3
4
.
8
0
$5,254.80$34.00$5,134.00
50
25
6
4
.
6
0
2
F&
I
S
I
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
T
Y
P
E
D
EA
C
H
16
$3
2
.
0
0
$5
1
2
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1
6
0
.
6
1
$2,569.76$160.00$2,560.00
51
25
6
4
.
6
0
2
SA
L
V
A
G
E
A
N
D
R
E
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
S
I
G
N
EA
C
H
2
$5
0
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
6
0
.
6
1
$321.22$160.00$320.00
52
25
6
5
.
6
0
3
4"
N
O
N
-
M
E
T
A
L
L
I
C
C
O
N
D
U
I
T
LI
N
F
T
12
0
$1
5
.
0
0
$1
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
2
0
$384.00$10.00$1,200.00
53
25
7
1
.
5
0
2
DE
C
I
D
U
O
U
S
T
R
E
E
2
.
5
"
C
A
L
B
&
B
TR
E
E
20
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4
4
9
.
7
0
$8,994.00$300.00$6,000.00
54
25
7
3
.
5
0
2
SI
L
T
F
E
N
C
E
,
T
Y
P
E
H
E
A
V
Y
D
U
T
Y
LI
N
F
T
50
$2
.
5
0
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$4
.
2
5
$2
1
2
.
5
0
$3
.
2
1
$160.50$4.50$225.00
55
25
7
3
.
5
4
0
FI
L
T
E
R
L
O
G
T
Y
P
E
C
O
M
P
O
S
T
L
O
G
LI
N
F
T
48
0
$2
.
5
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
.
6
5
$1
,
2
7
2
.
0
0
$3
.
2
1
$1,540.80$2.75$1,320.00
56
25
7
3
.
6
0
2
TE
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
R
O
C
K
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
EA
C
H
9
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$8
0
0
.
0
0
$7
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$6
4
2
.
4
3
$5,781.87$600.00$5,400.00
57
25
7
5
.
5
0
1
SE
E
D
I
N
G
AC
R
E
0.
1
$4
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$4
8
0
.
0
0
$9
5
0
.
0
0
$9
5
.
0
0
$1
0
7
.
1
0
$10.71$1,000.00$100.00
58
25
7
5
.
5
0
2
SE
E
D
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
2
4
0
PO
U
N
D
7
$2
.
5
0
$1
7
.
5
0
$2
.
8
5
$1
9
.
9
5
$5
.
3
5
$37.45$3.00$21.00
59
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
73
0
1
$2
.
5
0
$1
8
,
2
5
2
.
5
0
$2
.
4
0
$1
7
,
5
2
2
.
4
0
$3
.
1
6
$23,071.16$2.50$18,252.50Page 2of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Re
d
s
t
o
n
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
R
o
g
e
r
s
)
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price Unit Price Total Price
60
25
7
5
.
5
2
3
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
B
L
A
N
K
E
T
S
C
A
T
E
G
O
R
Y
3
SQ
Y
D
43
0
$3
.
0
0
$1
,
2
9
0
.
0
0
$0
.
9
9
$4
2
5
.
7
0
$1
.
3
4
$576.20$1.00$430.00
61
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
22
5
$0
.
7
5
$1
6
8
.
7
5
$0
.
5
5
$1
2
3
.
7
5
$0
.
8
0
$180.00$0.60$135.00
62
25
7
5
.
5
6
0
HY
D
R
A
U
L
I
C
S
O
I
L
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
5
PO
U
N
D
25
2
0
$1
.
0
0
$2
,
5
2
0
.
0
0
$0
.
6
7
$1
,
6
8
8
.
4
0
$1
.
0
2
$2,570.40$0.70$1,764.00
63
25
8
2
.
5
0
2
12
"
S
O
L
I
D
L
I
N
E
W
H
I
T
E
-
E
P
O
X
Y
LI
N
F
T
96
$1
.
0
0
$9
6
.
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$9
6
0
.
0
0
$1
0
.
7
1
$1,028.16$10.00$960.00
64
25
8
2
.
5
0
3
CR
O
S
S
W
A
L
K
M
A
R
K
I
N
G
-
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
(
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
)
SQ
F
T
11
0
$5
.
0
0
$5
5
0
.
0
0
$1
5
.
0
0
$1
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$1
6
.
0
6
$1,766.60$16.00$1,760.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
,
0
1
6
,
2
7
6
.
7
5
$9
4
5
,
5
0
9
.
8
0
$935,556.56 $979,993.50
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
B
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
65
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
E
W
E
R
P
I
P
E
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
)
LI
N
F
T
21
4
0
$1
2
.
0
0
$2
5
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$0
.
0
1
$2
1
.
4
0
$0
.
0
1
$21.40$1.00$2,140.00
66
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
P
I
P
E
LI
N
F
T
11
2
0
$4
.
0
0
$4
,
4
8
0
.
0
0
$0
.
0
1
$1
1
.
2
0
$0
.
0
1
$11.20$1.00$1,120.00
67
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
EA
C
H
11
$8
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$3
3
9
.
0
0
$3
,
7
2
9
.
0
0
$3
6
2
.
9
7
$3,992.67$300.00$3,300.00
68
21
0
4
.
6
0
3
RE
M
O
V
E
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
D
R
O
P
LI
N
F
T
7
$2
5
.
0
0
$1
7
5
.
0
0
$1
1
3
.
0
0
$7
9
1
.
0
0
$1
2
0
.
9
9
$846.93$25.00$175.00
69
21
0
4
.
6
0
3
AB
A
N
D
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
LI
N
F
T
45
$1
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$9
.
0
5
$4
0
7
.
2
5
$9
.
6
9
$436.05$20.00$900.00
70
24
5
1
.
6
0
9
GR
A
N
U
L
A
R
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
/
O
R
B
E
D
D
I
N
G
TO
N
76
0
$1
3
.
5
0
$1
0
,
2
6
0
.
0
0
$0
.
0
2
$1
5
.
2
0
$0
.
0
2
$15.20$20.00$15,200.00
71
25
0
3
.
6
0
1
SA
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
B
Y
P
A
S
S
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$2
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
6
,
7
6
7
.
7
5
$26,767.75$40,000.00$40,000.00
72
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
EA
C
H
7
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$4
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$3
0
6
.
0
0
$2
,
1
4
2
.
0
0
$3
2
7
.
6
4
$2,293.48$3,000.00$21,000.00
73
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
S
(
S
A
N
)
EA
C
H
3
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$4
8
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$5
1
3
.
9
4
$1,541.82$3,000.00$9,000.00
74
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
RE
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
69
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$1
1
9
.
0
0
$8
,
2
1
1
.
0
0
$1
2
7
.
4
1
$8,791.29$50.00$3,450.00
75
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
F
O
R
C
E
M
A
I
N
EA
C
H
1
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
7
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
7
0
.
0
0
$1
,
7
8
8
.
0
9
$1,788.09$1,000.00$1,000.00
76
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
EX
C
A
V
A
T
E
T
O
L
O
C
A
T
E
S
E
W
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
69
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$2
4
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$0
.
0
1
$0
.
6
9
$0
.
0
1
$0.69$300.00$20,700.00
77
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
8"
X
4
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
5
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
1
9
.
0
0
$5
9
5
.
0
0
$1
2
7
.
4
1
$637.05$80.00$400.00
78
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
8"
X
6
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
1
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
6
.
0
0
$1
5
6
.
0
0
$1
6
7
.
0
3
$167.03$100.00$100.00
79
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
10
"
X
4
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
21
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$2
4
0
.
0
0
$5
,
0
4
0
.
0
0
$2
5
6
.
9
7
$5,396.37$175.00$3,675.00
80
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
12
"
X
6
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
2
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$3
1
7
.
0
0
$6
3
4
.
0
0
$3
3
9
.
4
2
$678.84$250.00$500.00
81
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
15
"
X
4
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
7
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$7
0
0
.
0
0
$4
0
7
.
0
0
$2
,
8
4
9
.
0
0
$4
3
5
.
7
8
$3,050.46$300.00$2,100.00
82
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
15
"
X
6
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
1
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$4
7
5
.
0
0
$4
7
5
.
0
0
$5
0
8
.
5
9
$508.59$370.00$370.00
83
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
10
"
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
60
$4
5
.
0
0
$2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$7
4
.
8
0
$4
,
4
8
8
.
0
0
$8
0
.
0
9
$4,805.40$100.00$6,000.00
84
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
16
"
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
20
$8
5
.
0
0
$1
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
4
.
0
0
$2
,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$1
1
1
.
3
5
$2,227.00$150.00$3,000.00
85
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
LI
N
I
N
G
S
E
W
E
R
P
I
P
E
1
2
"
LI
N
F
T
44
0
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$5
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$6
4
.
0
0
$2
8
,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$9
1
.
0
1
$40,044.40$75.00$33,000.00
86
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
4"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
2
6
LI
N
F
T
11
2
4
$2
5
.
0
0
$2
8
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$2
4
.
7
0
$2
7
,
7
6
2
.
8
0
$2
6
.
4
5
$29,729.80$24.00$26,976.00
87
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
4"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
2
6
(
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
)
LI
N
F
T
17
2
0
$2
0
.
0
0
$3
4
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
.
2
0
$3
4
,
7
4
4
.
0
0
$2
1
.
6
3
$37,203.60$24.00$41,280.00
88
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
6"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
2
6
LI
N
F
T
19
1
$2
7
.
0
0
$5
,
1
5
7
.
0
0
$2
6
.
3
0
$5
,
0
2
3
.
3
0
$2
8
.
1
6
$5,378.56$28.00$5,348.00
89
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
SA
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
(
T
E
L
E
V
I
S
I
N
G
)
LI
N
F
T
22
6
0
$1
.
2
5
$2
,
8
2
5
.
0
0
$1
.
1
5
$2
,
5
9
9
.
0
0
$1
.
2
3
$2,779.80$1.25$2,825.00
90
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
8"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
3
5
LI
N
F
T
54
0
$2
8
.
0
0
$1
5
,
1
2
0
.
0
0
$2
4
.
6
0
$1
3
,
2
8
4
.
0
0
$2
6
.
3
4
$14,223.60$42.00$22,680.00
91
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
10
"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
3
5
LI
N
F
T
99
0
$3
5
.
0
0
$3
4
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$3
0
.
8
0
$3
0
,
4
9
2
.
0
0
$3
2
.
9
8
$32,650.20$45.00$44,550.00
92
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
15
"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
3
5
LI
N
F
T
61
0
$3
8
.
0
0
$2
3
,
1
8
0
.
0
0
$4
7
.
6
0
$2
9
,
0
3
6
.
0
0
$5
0
.
9
7
$31,091.70$55.00$33,550.00Page 3of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Re
d
s
t
o
n
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
R
o
g
e
r
s
)
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Unit Price Total Price
93
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
CH
I
M
N
E
Y
S
E
A
L
EA
C
H
16
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
1
5
.
0
0
$3
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$2
3
0
.
2
0
$3,683.20$150.00$2,400.00
94
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
CA
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
)
EA
C
H
10
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$6
6
6
.
0
0
$6
,
6
6
0
.
0
0
$7
1
3
.
0
9
$7,130.90$500.00$5,000.00
95
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
RE
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
S
EA
C
H
1
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$9
0
4
.
0
0
$9
0
4
.
0
0
$9
6
7
.
9
2
$967.92$1,000.00$1,000.00
96
25
0
6
.
6
0
3
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
1
0
"
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
D
R
O
P
LI
N
F
T
4
$2
8
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
2
0
.
0
0
$7
3
6
.
0
0
$2
,
9
4
4
.
0
0
$7
8
8
.
0
4
$3,152.16$600.00$2,400.00
97
25
0
6
.
6
0
3
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
1
5
"
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
D
R
O
P
LI
N
F
T
4
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$5
,
7
6
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
4
1
.
8
2
$6,167.28$1,600.00$6,400.00
98
25
0
6
.
6
0
3
CO
N
S
T
4
8
"
D
I
A
S
A
N
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
LI
N
F
T
10
0
$2
3
5
.
0
0
$2
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
7
2
.
0
0
$1
7
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
8
4
.
1
6
$1
8
,
4
1
6
.
0
0
$150.00$15,000.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
B
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$3
6
2
,
8
4
7
.
0
0
$2
6
7
,
7
6
4
.
8
4
$2
9
6
,
5
9
6
.
4
3
$376,539.00
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
C
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
99
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
LI
N
F
T
14
1
$6
.
5
0
$9
1
6
.
5
0
$3
.
4
0
$4
7
9
.
4
0
$3
.
6
4
$513.24$4.00$564.00
10
0
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
H
Y
D
R
A
N
T
EA
C
H
6
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
7
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
2
0
.
0
0
$1
8
2
.
0
2
$1,092.12$250.00$1,500.00
10
1
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
C
U
R
B
S
T
O
P
&
B
O
X
EA
C
H
10
$7
5
.
0
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$5
6
.
2
2
$5
6
2
.
2
0
$6
0
.
2
0
$602.00$100.00$1,000.00
10
2
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
&
B
O
X
EA
C
H
14
$1
2
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$1
1
3
.
0
0
$1
,
5
8
2
.
0
0
$1
2
0
.
9
9
$1,693.86$150.00$2,100.00
10
3
21
0
5
.
5
1
5
EX
P
L
O
R
A
T
O
R
Y
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
EA
C
H
3
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
3
9
.
0
0
$1
,
0
1
7
.
0
0
$3
6
2
.
9
7
$1,088.91$600.00$1,800.00
10
4
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
EX
C
A
V
A
T
E
T
O
L
O
C
A
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
10
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
7
0
.
0
0
$1
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$1
8
2
.
0
2
$1,820.20$600.00$6,000.00
10
5
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
EA
C
H
16
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$1
0
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$5
1
0
.
0
0
$8
,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$5
4
6
.
0
6
$8,736.96$2,000.00$32,000.00
10
6
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
3
$1
7
0
.
0
0
$5
1
0
.
0
0
$9
5
.
8
0
$2
8
7
.
4
0
$1
0
2
.
7
9
$308.37$100.00$300.00
10
7
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
HY
D
R
A
N
T
EA
C
H
6
$2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
2
3
0
.
0
0
$1
9
,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$3
,
4
5
8
.
3
9
$2
0
,
7
5
0
.
3
4
$3,000.00$18,000.00
10
8
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
AD
J
U
S
T
V
A
L
V
E
B
O
X
EA
C
H
5
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$2
8
3
.
0
0
$1
,
4
1
5
.
0
0
$3
0
3
.
0
1
$1,515.05$150.00$750.00
10
9
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
1"
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
T
O
P
EA
C
H
1
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$2
5
4
.
0
0
$2
5
4
.
0
0
$2
7
1
.
9
6
$271.96$100.00$100.00
11
0
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
6"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
17
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
7
0
.
0
0
$2
4
,
9
9
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
7
3
.
9
4
$2
6
,
7
5
6
.
9
8
$1,150.00$19,550.00
11
1
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
1"
C
U
R
B
S
T
O
P
&
B
O
X
EA
C
H
3
$2
2
0
.
0
0
$6
6
0
.
0
0
$3
0
6
.
0
0
$9
1
8
.
0
0
$3
2
7
.
6
4
$982.92$150.00$450.00
11
2
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
R
E
P
A
I
R
EA
C
H
12
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
8
3
.
0
0
$3
,
3
9
6
.
0
0
$3
0
3
.
0
1
$3,636.12$300.00$3,600.00
11
3
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
1"
T
Y
P
E
K
C
O
P
P
E
R
P
I
P
E
LI
N
F
T
60
$1
7
.
0
0
$1
,
0
2
0
.
0
0
$2
9
.
6
0
$1
,
7
7
6
.
0
0
$3
1
.
6
9
$1,901.40$24.00$1,440.00
11
4
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
6"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
13
2
$3
5
.
0
0
$4
,
6
2
0
.
0
0
$3
4
.
2
0
$4
,
5
1
4
.
4
0
$3
6
.
6
2
$4,833.84$40.00$5,280.00
11
5
25
0
4
.
6
0
4
4"
P
O
L
Y
S
T
Y
R
E
N
E
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
14
0
$2
2
.
0
0
$3
,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$3
5
.
1
0
$4
,
9
1
4
.
0
0
$3
7
.
5
8
$5,261.20$30.00$4,200.00
11
6
25
0
4
.
6
0
8
DU
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
S
PO
U
N
D
20
0
0
$5
.
7
5
$1
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
5
0
$7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
7
5
$7,500.00$3.00$6,000.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
C
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$8
5
,
4
8
6
.
5
0
$8
3
,
3
6
5
.
4
0
$8
9
,
2
6
5
.
4
7
$104,634.00
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
D
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
11
7
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
E
W
E
R
P
I
P
E
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
LI
N
F
T
95
0
$8
.
0
0
$7
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$9
.
0
5
$8
,
5
9
7
.
5
0
$9
.
6
9
$9,205.50$8.00$7,600.00
11
8
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
1
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
1
0
.
0
0
$1
1
0
.
0
0
$1
1
7
.
7
8
$117.78$250.00$250.00
11
9
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
O
R
C
A
T
C
H
B
A
S
I
N
EA
C
H
15
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$6
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$2
8
2
.
0
8
$4
,
2
3
1
.
2
0
$3
0
1
.
9
4
$4,529.10$250.00$3,750.00
12
0
24
5
2
.
6
0
2
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
A
D
D
L
E
EA
C
H
1
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$9
6
0
.
0
0
$9
6
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
2
7
.
8
8
$1,027.88$2,000.00$2,000.00
12
1
25
0
1
.
6
0
2
TR
A
S
H
G
U
A
R
D
F
O
R
3
0
"
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$7
3
7
.
0
0
$7
3
7
.
0
0
$7
8
9
.
1
1
$789.11$400.00$400.00
12
2
25
0
1
.
6
0
2
TR
A
S
H
G
U
A
R
D
F
O
R
4
2
"
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
6
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
6
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
4
9
.
0
9
$1,349.09$650.00$650.00
12
3
25
0
1
.
6
0
2
30
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
W
/
P
I
L
I
N
G
EA
C
H
1
$8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
8
3
0
.
0
0
$2
,
8
3
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
3
0
.
1
1
$3,030.11$2,500.00$2,500.00Page 4of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Re
d
s
t
o
n
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
R
o
g
e
r
s
)
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price Unit PriceTotal Price
12
4
25
0
2
.
5
4
1
4"
P
E
R
F
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
D
R
A
I
N
LI
N
F
T
80
$1
5
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
8
.
1
0
$1
,
4
4
8
.
0
0
$1
9
.
3
8
$1,550.40$10.00$800.00
12
5
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
12
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
V
LI
N
F
T
89
$2
7
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
3
.
0
0
$2
5
.
8
0
$2
,
2
9
6
.
2
0
$2
7
.
6
2
$2,458.18$30.00$2,670.00
12
6
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
15
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
V
LI
N
F
T
27
6
$2
8
.
0
0
$7
,
7
2
8
.
0
0
$2
6
.
7
0
$7
,
3
6
9
.
2
0
$2
8
.
5
9
$7,890.84$26.00$7,176.00
12
7
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
21
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
I
I
I
LI
N
F
T
32
0
$3
6
.
0
0
$1
1
,
5
2
0
.
0
0
$3
4
.
2
0
$1
0
,
9
4
4
.
0
0
$3
6
.
6
2
$11,718.40$34.00$10,880.00
12
8
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
30
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
I
I
I
LI
N
F
T
10
0
$5
2
.
0
0
$5
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$5
5
.
5
0
$5
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$5
9
.
4
2
$5,942.00$50.00$5,000.00
12
9
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
36
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
I
I
I
LI
N
F
T
28
$8
5
.
0
0
$2
,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$1
5
5
.
0
0
$4
,
3
4
0
.
0
0
$1
6
5
.
9
6
$4,646.88$88.00$2,464.00
13
0
25
0
3
.
5
7
3
RE
P
A
I
R
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
EA
C
H
3
$5
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$3
9
6
.
0
0
$1
,
1
8
8
.
0
0
$4
2
4
.
0
0
$1,272.00$600.00$1,800.00
13
1
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
EA
C
H
9
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$5
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$2
2
6
.
0
0
$2
,
0
3
4
.
0
0
$2
4
1
.
9
8
$2,177.82$850.00$7,650.00
13
2
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
EA
C
H
4
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$4
5
3
.
0
0
$1
,
8
1
2
.
0
0
$4
8
5
.
0
3
$1,940.12$600.00$2,400.00
13
3
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
ST
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
(
T
E
L
E
V
I
S
I
N
G
)
LI
N
F
T
81
2
$1
.
5
0
$1
,
2
1
8
.
0
0
$1
.
5
0
$1
,
2
1
8
.
0
0
$1
.
6
1
$1,307.32$1.50$1,218.00
13
4
25
0
6
.
5
0
1
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
4
8
-
4
0
2
0
LI
N
F
T
37
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$9
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$2
3
6
.
0
0
$8
,
7
3
2
.
0
0
$2
5
2
.
6
9
$9,349.53$225.00$8,325.00
13
5
25
0
6
.
5
0
1
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
6
0
-
4
0
2
0
LI
N
F
T
40
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
3
7
.
0
0
$9
,
4
8
0
.
0
0
$2
5
3
.
7
6
$10,150.40$200.00$8,000.00
13
6
25
0
6
.
5
0
1
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
1
EA
C
H
10
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$1
4
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
4
1
.
8
2
$15,418.20$950.00$9,500.00
13
7
25
0
6
.
5
1
6
CA
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
(
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
)
EA
C
H
6
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$6
6
5
.
0
0
$3
,
9
9
0
.
0
0
$7
1
2
.
0
2
$4,272.12$500.00$3,000.00
13
8
25
0
6
.
5
1
6
CA
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
(
C
A
T
C
H
B
A
S
I
N
)
EA
C
H
3
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$5
8
9
.
0
0
$1
,
7
6
7
.
0
0
$6
3
0
.
6
5
$1,891.95$500.00$1,500.00
13
9
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
EA
C
H
37
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$3
4
0
.
0
0
$1
2
,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$3
6
4
.
0
4
$13,469.48$250.00$9,250.00
14
0
25
1
1
.
5
1
5
GE
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
F
A
B
R
I
C
T
Y
P
E
I
V
SQ
Y
D
9
$3
.
0
0
$2
7
.
0
0
$2
.
4
0
$2
1
.
6
0
$2
.
5
7
$23.13$10.00$90.00
14
1
25
1
1
.
6
0
9
FI
E
L
D
S
T
O
N
E
R
I
P
R
A
P
C
L
A
S
S
I
V
TO
N
17
$1
1
0
.
0
0
$1
,
8
7
0
.
0
0
$7
9
.
2
0
$1
,
3
4
6
.
4
0
$8
4
.
8
0
$1,441.60$100.00$1,700.00
14
2
25
7
3
.
5
3
0
ST
O
R
M
D
R
A
I
N
I
N
L
E
T
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
EA
C
H
45
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$5
,
6
2
5
.
0
0
$1
4
2
.
0
0
$6
,
3
9
0
.
0
0
$9
6
.
3
6
$4,336.20$150.00$6,750.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
D
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
2
1
,
4
2
1
.
0
0
$1
1
5
,
6
3
2
.
1
0
$121,305.14 $107,323.00
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
E
-
7
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
N
D
W
A
L
N
U
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
14
3
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$5
,
8
4
0
.
6
7
$5,840.67$5,000.00$5,000.00
14
4
21
0
1
.
5
0
2
CL
E
A
R
I
N
G
TR
E
E
3
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$1
6
0
.
6
1
$481.83$200.00$600.00
14
5
21
0
1
.
5
0
7
GR
U
B
B
I
N
G
TR
E
E
3
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$7
5
.
0
0
$2
2
5
.
0
0
$1
6
0
.
6
1
$481.83$200.00$600.00
14
6
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
C
U
R
B
A
N
D
G
U
T
T
E
R
LI
N
F
T
30
0
$3
.
5
0
$1
,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$2
.
5
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$2
.
1
4
$642.00$2.50$750.00
14
7
21
0
4
.
5
0
3
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
11
0
0
$0
.
7
5
$8
2
5
.
0
0
$0
.
3
5
$3
8
5
.
0
0
$1
.
8
2
$2,002.00$1.75$1,925.00
14
8
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
20
0
$2
.
5
0
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
.
7
5
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$3
.
9
0
$780.00$1.75$350.00
14
9
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
SQ
Y
D
32
$8
.
5
0
$2
7
2
.
0
0
$3
.
1
0
$9
9
.
2
0
$1
.
8
8
$60.16$4.00$128.00
15
0
21
0
4
.
5
1
3
SA
W
I
N
G
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
(
F
U
L
L
D
E
P
T
H
)
LI
N
F
T
30
0
$2
.
5
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$2
.
8
5
$8
5
5
.
0
0
$3
.
0
5
$915.00$3.00$900.00
15
1
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
23
0
$6
.
0
0
$1
,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$5
.
8
5
$1
,
3
4
5
.
5
0
$8
.
8
3
$2,030.90$8.50$1,955.00
15
2
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
45
$1
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$5
.
8
5
$2
6
3
.
2
5
$8
.
8
3
$397.35$8.50$382.50
15
3
21
0
5
.
5
2
2
SE
L
E
C
T
G
R
A
N
U
L
A
R
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
60
$1
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$9
.
7
5
$5
8
5
.
0
0
$1
0
.
7
1
$642.60$12.00$720.00
15
4
21
0
5
.
5
2
5
TO
P
S
O
I
L
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
14
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
4
0
.
0
0
$1
4
.
5
0
$2
0
3
.
0
0
$1
3
.
9
2
$194.88$14.00$196.00
15
5
21
2
3
.
6
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
S
W
E
E
P
E
R
(
W
I
T
H
P
I
C
K
U
P
B
R
O
O
M
)
HO
U
R
5
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$6
2
5
.
0
0
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$6
2
5
.
0
0
$1
4
3
.
1
3
$715.65$110.00$550.00
15
6
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
32
$1
2
.
0
0
$3
8
4
.
0
0
$1
3
.
1
6
$4
2
1
.
1
2
$1
3
.
1
3
$420.16$24.00$768.00Page 5of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Re
d
s
t
o
n
e
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(R
o
g
e
r
s
)
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price Unit PriceTotal Price
15
7
22
3
2
.
5
0
1
MI
L
L
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
(
2
.
0
"
)
SQ
Y
D
40
0
0
$2
.
5
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
.
3
8
$9
,
5
2
0
.
0
0
$2.37$9,480.00$2.50$10,000.00
15
8
23
0
1
.
6
0
3
MU
D
J
A
C
K
I
N
G
(
C
U
R
B
)
LI
N
F
T
20
$1
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$5.50$110.00$20.00$400.00
15
9
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
26
0
$2
.
5
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$2
.
5
8
$6
7
0
.
8
0
$2.57$668.20$2.50$650.00
16
0
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
36
0
$5
3
.
0
0
$1
9
,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$5
6
.
4
3
$2
0
,
3
1
4
.
8
0
$56.31$20,271.60$56.00$20,160.00
16
1
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
1
2
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
34
$4
8
.
0
0
$1
,
6
3
2
.
0
0
$6
1
.
4
7
$2
,
0
8
9
.
9
8
$61.34$2,085.56$64.00$2,176.00
16
2
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
12
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
V
LI
N
F
T
10
$2
7
.
0
0
$2
7
0
.
0
0
$4
2
.
7
6
$4
2
7
.
6
0
$45.78$457.80$40.00$400.00
16
3
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
I
N
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
EA
C
H
1
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$4
8
1
.
8
2
$481.82$600.00$600.00
16
4
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
R
E
P
A
I
R
EA
C
H
1
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
4
2
.
0
0
$3
4
2
.
0
0
$3
6
6
.
1
8
$366.18$300.00$300.00
16
5
25
0
6
.
5
0
1
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
1
LI
N
F
T
1
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
4
1
.
8
2
$1,541.82$950.00$950.00
16
6
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
)
EA
C
H
1
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
9
5
.
0
0
$3
9
5
.
0
0
$4
2
2
.
9
3
$422.93$250.00$250.00
16
7
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
EA
C
H
2
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$3
9
5
.
0
0
$7
9
0
.
0
0
$4
2
2
.
9
3
$845.86$250.00$500.00
16
8
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
CH
I
M
N
E
Y
S
E
A
L
EA
C
H
1
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
1
7
.
0
0
$2
1
7
.
0
0
$2
3
2
.
3
4
$232.34$150.00$150.00
16
9
25
2
1
.
5
0
1
4"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
11
0
0
$3
.
5
0
$3
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$3
.
2
5
$3
,
5
7
5
.
0
0
$3.85$4,235.00$3.25$3,575.00
17
0
25
3
1
.
5
0
1
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
B
6
1
8
LI
N
F
T
30
0
$1
0
.
5
0
$3
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$1
0
.
8
5
$3
,
2
5
5
.
0
0
$15.53$4,659.00$16.00$4,800.00
17
1
25
3
1
.
6
0
2
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
C
U
R
B
R
A
M
P
EA
C
H
2
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$2
1
5
.
0
0
$4
3
0
.
0
0
$2
4
6
.
2
7
$492.54$250.00$500.00
17
2
25
3
1
.
6
0
4
7"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
SQ
Y
D
45
$5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$5
1
.
7
5
$2
,
3
2
8
.
7
5
$67.45$3,035.25$50.00$2,250.00
17
3
25
3
1
.
6
1
8
TR
U
N
C
A
T
E
D
D
O
M
E
S
SQ
F
T
16
$3
5
.
0
0
$5
6
0
.
0
0
$3
0
.
0
0
$4
8
0
.
0
0
$29.98$479.68$35.00$560.00
17
4
25
5
0
.
5
5
2
FL
A
S
H
E
R
S
I
G
N
A
L
EA
C
H
2
$3
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$6
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$7
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
3
5
1
.
4
8
$16,702.96$8,000.00$16,000.00
17
5
25
6
3
.
6
0
1
TR
A
F
F
I
C
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$300.00$2,000.00$2,000.00
17
6
25
6
4
.
5
3
1
F&
I
S
I
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
S
T
Y
P
E
C
SQ
F
T
13
$3
0
.
0
0
$3
9
0
.
0
0
$3
2
.
5
0
$4
2
2
.
5
0
$34.26$445.38$34.00$442.00
17
7
25
7
1
.
5
0
2
DE
C
I
D
U
O
U
S
T
R
E
E
2
.
5
"
C
A
L
B
&
B
TR
E
E
3
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$4
4
9
.
7
0
$1,349.10$300.00$900.00
17
8
25
7
3
.
5
3
0
ST
O
R
M
D
R
A
I
N
I
N
L
E
T
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
EA
C
H
3
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$3
7
5
.
0
0
$1
4
1
.
0
0
$4
2
3
.
0
0
$96.36$289.08$150.00$450.00
17
9
25
7
3
.
5
4
0
FI
L
T
E
R
L
O
G
T
Y
P
E
C
O
M
P
O
S
T
L
O
G
LI
N
F
T
20
$2
.
5
0
$5
0
.
0
0
$4
.
2
5
$8
5
.
0
0
$5.35$107.00$4.50$90.00
18
0
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
13
0
$2
.
5
0
$3
2
5
.
0
0
$1
0
.
2
5
$1
,
3
3
2
.
5
0
$9.64$1,253.20$10.50$1,365.00
18
1
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
4
$0
.
7
5
$3
.
0
0
$0
.
9
9
$3
.
9
6
$0.80$3.20$1.00$4.00
18
2
25
8
2
.
5
0
1
PA
V
E
M
E
N
T
M
E
S
S
A
G
E
(
L
E
F
T
A
R
R
O
W
)
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
-
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
EA
C
H
6
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$9
0
0
.
0
0
$4
2
5
.
0
0
$2
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$4
5
5
.
0
5
$2,730.30$435.00$2,610.00
18
3
25
8
2
.
5
0
1
PA
V
E
M
E
N
T
M
E
S
S
A
G
E
(
R
I
G
H
T
A
R
R
O
W
)
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
-
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
EA
C
H
3
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$4
2
5
.
0
0
$1
,
2
7
5
.
0
0
$4
5
5
.
0
5
$1,365.15$435.00$1,305.00
18
4
25
8
2
.
5
0
1
PA
V
E
M
E
N
T
M
E
S
S
A
G
E
(
T
H
R
U
A
R
R
O
W
)
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
-
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
EA
C
H
1
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$4
2
5
.
0
0
$4
2
5
.
0
0
$4
5
5
.
0
5
$455.05$435.00$435.00
18
5
25
8
2
.
5
0
2
4"
S
O
L
I
D
L
I
N
E
W
H
I
T
E
-
E
P
O
X
Y
LI
N
F
T
80
0
$0
.
2
5
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
.
0
0
$8
0
0
.
0
0
$1.07$856.00$1.10$880.00
18
6
25
8
2
.
5
0
2
12
"
S
O
L
I
D
L
I
N
E
W
H
I
T
E
-
E
P
O
X
Y
LI
N
F
T
24
$1
.
0
0
$2
4
.
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$2
4
0
.
0
0
$10.71$257.04$12.00$288.00
18
7
25
8
2
.
5
0
2
4"
D
O
U
B
L
E
S
O
L
I
D
L
I
N
E
Y
E
L
L
O
W
-
E
P
O
X
Y
LI
N
F
T
90
0
$0
.
5
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$2
.
0
0
$1
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$2.14$1,926.00$2.20$1,980.00
18
8
25
8
2
.
5
0
3
CR
O
S
S
W
A
L
K
M
A
R
K
I
N
G
-
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
(
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
)
SQ
F
T
26
0
$5
.
0
0
$1
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
3
.
0
0
$3
,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$13.92$3,619.20$14.00$3,640.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
E
-
7
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
N
D
W
A
L
N
U
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$6
9
,
0
9
5
.
0
0
$8
6
,
2
6
9
.
9
6
$97,129.27 $95,434.50
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
F
-
W
E
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
18
9
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$8
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$6
,
9
0
0
.
2
8
$6,900.28$8,000.00$8,000.00Page 6of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Re
d
s
t
o
n
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
R
o
g
e
r
s
)
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price Unit Price Total Price
19
0
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
LI
N
F
T
23
0
$5
.
0
0
$1
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$4
.
5
5
$1
,
0
4
6
.
5
0
$4
.
8
7
$1,120.10$2.00$460.00
19
1
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
E
W
E
R
P
I
P
E
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
LI
N
F
T
13
2
$8
.
0
0
$1
,
0
5
6
.
0
0
$3
.
4
0
$4
4
8
.
8
0
$3
.
6
4
$480.48$4.00$528.00
19
2
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
P
I
P
E
LI
N
F
T
80
$5
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$0
.
0
1
$0
.
8
0
$0
.
0
1
$0.80$1.00$80.00
19
3
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
37
0
$2
.
5
0
$9
2
5
.
0
0
$2
.
2
5
$8
3
2
.
5
0
$3
.
9
0
$1,443.00$2.00$740.00
19
4
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
6
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
2
.
3
0
$1
3
3
.
8
0
$2
3
.
8
8
$143.28$100.00$600.00
19
5
21
0
4
.
5
1
3
SA
W
I
N
G
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
(
F
U
L
L
D
E
P
T
H
)
LI
N
F
T
25
0
$3
.
5
0
$8
7
5
.
0
0
$2
.
9
5
$7
3
7
.
5
0
$3
.
1
6
$790.00$3.00$750.00
19
6
21
0
4
.
5
2
3
SA
L
V
A
G
E
S
I
G
N
EA
C
H
11
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$4
0
.
0
0
$4
4
0
.
0
0
$2
6
.
7
7
$294.47$40.00$440.00
19
7
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
29
0
0
$7
.
0
0
$2
0
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$5
.
4
5
$1
5
,
8
0
5
.
0
0
$6
.
8
0
$19,720.00$6.50$18,850.00
19
8
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
29
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$2
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$5
.
4
5
$1
,
5
8
0
.
5
0
$5
.
2
5
$1,522.50$5.00$1,450.00
19
9
21
0
5
.
5
2
2
SE
L
E
C
T
G
R
A
N
U
L
A
R
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
24
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$2
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$9
.
7
5
$2
3
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$6
.
4
2
$15,408.00$6.50$15,600.00
20
0
21
1
2
.
5
0
1
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
RO
A
D
S
T
A
14
.
6
5
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
6
6
2
.
5
0
$4
5
.
0
0
$6
5
9
.
2
5
$4
8
.
1
8
$705.84$120.00$1,758.00
20
1
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
23
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$2
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
3
.
5
5
$3
1
,
1
6
5
.
0
0
$1
3
.
5
2
$31,096.00$7.00$16,100.00
20
2
23
3
1
.
6
0
4
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
R
E
C
L
A
M
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
47
0
0
$5
.
0
0
$2
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
.
7
5
$8
,
2
2
5
.
0
0
$1
.
8
2
$8,554.00$1.50$7,050.00
20
3
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
31
0
$1
.
5
0
$4
6
5
.
0
0
$2
.
5
8
$7
9
9
.
8
0
$2
.
5
7
$796.70$2.50$775.00
20
4
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
81
0
$5
6
.
0
0
$4
5
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$5
5
.
8
5
$4
5
,
2
3
8
.
5
0
$5
5
.
7
4
$45,149.40$53.00$42,930.00
20
5
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
81
0
$2
0
.
0
0
$1
6
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$5
0
.
6
8
$4
1
,
0
5
0
.
8
0
$5
0
.
5
8
$40,969.80$51.00$41,310.00
20
6
25
0
1
.
5
1
1
15
"
C
M
P
I
P
E
C
U
L
V
E
R
T
LI
N
F
T
13
2
$3
0
.
0
0
$3
,
9
6
0
.
0
0
$2
4
.
9
0
$3
,
2
8
6
.
8
0
$2
6
.
6
6
$3,519.12$20.00$2,640.00
20
7
25
0
1
.
5
1
5
15
"
C
M
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
6
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
6
9
.
0
0
$1
,
0
1
4
.
0
0
$1
8
0
.
9
5
$1,085.70$100.00$600.00
20
8
25
0
2
.
5
4
1
6"
P
E
R
F
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
D
R
A
I
N
LI
N
F
T
16
0
$1
6
.
0
0
$2
,
5
6
0
.
0
0
$1
8
.
1
0
$2
,
8
9
6
.
0
0
$1
9
.
3
8
$3,100.80$8.00$1,280.00
20
9
25
0
3
.
5
1
1
8"
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
20
$4
3
.
0
0
$8
6
0
.
0
0
$6
1
.
2
0
$1
,
2
2
4
.
0
0
$6
5
.
5
3
$1,310.60$80.00$1,600.00
21
0
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
S
(
S
A
N
)
EA
C
H
1
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
8
7
0
.
0
0
$1
,
8
7
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
2
.
2
3
$2,002.23$8,000.00$8,000.00
21
1
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
RE
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
1
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$1
8
0
.
0
0
$1
8
0
.
0
0
$1
9
2
.
7
3
$192.73$50.00$50.00
21
2
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CH
I
M
N
E
Y
S
E
A
L
S
EA
C
H
5
$2
2
5
.
0
0
$1
,
1
2
5
.
0
0
$2
1
5
.
0
0
$1
,
0
7
5
.
0
0
$2
3
0
.
2
0
$1,151.00$150.00$750.00
21
3
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
8"
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
D
R
O
P
LI
N
F
T
15
$2
2
5
.
0
0
$3
,
3
7
5
.
0
0
$2
4
3
.
0
0
$3
,
6
4
5
.
0
0
$2
6
0
.
1
8
$3,902.70$300.00$4,500.00
21
4
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
TE
L
E
V
I
S
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
LI
N
F
T
80
$2
.
0
0
$1
6
0
.
0
0
$2
.
5
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
.
6
8
$214.40$2.00$160.00
21
5
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
8"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
3
5
LI
N
F
T
92
$3
5
.
0
0
$3
,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$2
8
.
0
0
$2
,
5
7
6
.
0
0
$2
9
.
9
8
$2,758.16$30.00$2,760.00
21
6
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
4
2
.
0
0
$3
4
2
.
0
0
$3
6
6
.
1
8
$366.18$600.00$600.00
21
7
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
2
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$7
3
5
.
0
0
$1
,
4
7
0
.
0
0
$7
8
6
.
9
7
$1,573.94$200.00$400.00
21
8
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
AD
J
U
S
T
V
A
L
V
E
B
O
X
EA
C
H
4
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
8
3
.
0
0
$1
,
1
3
2
.
0
0
$3
0
3
.
0
1
$1,212.04$150.00$600.00
21
9
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
4"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
7
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
7
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
6
6
.
8
7
$1,466.87$1,000.00$1,000.00
22
0
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
6"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
9
1
.
9
2
$1,391.92$1,150.00$1,150.00
22
1
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
8"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
9
9
0
.
0
0
$1
,
9
9
0
.
0
0
$2
,
1
3
0
.
7
1
$2,130.71$1,500.00$1,500.00
22
2
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
12
"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
1
8
0
.
0
0
$3
,
1
8
0
.
0
0
$3
,
4
0
4
.
8
6
$3,404.86$2,600.00$2,600.00
22
3
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
HY
D
R
A
N
T
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
EA
C
H
1
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
1
8
0
.
0
0
$3
,
1
8
0
.
0
0
$3
,
4
0
4
.
8
6
$3,404.86$3,000.00$3,000.00
22
4
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
4"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
30
$2
8
.
0
0
$8
4
0
.
0
0
$3
0
.
6
0
$9
1
8
.
0
0
$3
2
.
7
6
$982.80$30.00$900.00Page 7of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Re
d
s
t
o
n
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
R
o
g
e
r
s
)
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Unit Price Total Price
22
5
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
6"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
6
$3
0
.
0
0
$1
8
0
.
0
0
$3
2
.
1
0
$1
9
2
.
6
0
$3
4
.
3
7
$206.22$30.00$180.00
22
6
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
8"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
60
$3
4
.
0
0
$2
,
0
4
0
.
0
0
$3
8
.
3
0
$2
,
2
9
8
.
0
0
$4
1
.
0
1
$2,460.60$36.00$2,160.00
22
7
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
12
"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
29
0
$5
0
.
0
0
$1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$5
7
.
1
0
$1
6
,
5
5
9
.
0
0
$6
1
.
1
4
$17,730.60$50.00$14,500.00
22
8
25
0
4
.
6
0
8
DU
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
S
PO
U
N
D
10
0
0
$3
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
1
0
$3
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
3
2
$3,320.00$3.00$3,000.00
22
9
25
0
6
.
5
1
6
CA
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
EA
C
H
1
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
6
3
.
0
0
$6
6
3
.
0
0
$7
0
9
.
8
8
$709.88$500.00$500.00
23
0
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
EA
C
H
4
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$3
4
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$3
6
4
.
0
4
$1,456.16$250.00$1,000.00
23
1
25
0
6
.
6
0
3
CO
N
S
T
4
8
"
D
I
A
S
A
N
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
LI
N
F
T
12
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1
6
2
.
0
0
$1
,
9
4
4
.
0
0
$1
7
3
.
4
6
$2,081.52$150.00$1,800.00
23
2
25
6
3
.
6
0
1
TR
A
F
F
I
C
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$300.00$2,000.00$2,000.00
23
3
25
6
4
.
5
3
1
SI
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
S
T
Y
P
E
C
SQ
F
T
26
.
2
5
$4
5
.
0
0
$1
,
1
8
1
.
2
5
$3
2
.
5
0
$8
5
3
.
1
3
$3
4
.
2
6
$899.33$34.00$892.50
23
4
25
6
4
.
6
0
2
F&
I
S
I
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
T
Y
P
E
D
EA
C
H
2
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
4
7
.
9
8
$695.96$300.00$600.00
23
5
25
7
5
.
5
0
1
SE
E
D
I
N
G
AC
R
E
0.
7
$3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
5
0
.
0
0
$9
5
0
.
0
0
$6
6
5
.
0
0
$5
3
5
.
3
6
$374.75$1,000.00$700.00
23
6
25
7
5
.
5
0
2
SE
E
D
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
2
4
0
PO
U
N
D
30
$5
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$2
.
8
5
$8
5
.
5
0
$3
.
2
1
$96.30$3.00$90.00
23
7
25
7
5
.
5
0
2
SE
E
D
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
2
6
0
PO
U
N
D
50
$8
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
1
0
$1
5
5
.
0
0
$0
.
8
6
$43.00$4.00$200.00
23
8
25
7
5
.
5
0
2
SE
E
D
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
2
7
0
PO
U
N
D
50
$1
0
.
0
0
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
2
5
$1
6
2
.
5
0
$3
.
2
1
$160.50$4.00$200.00
23
9
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
L
A
W
N
SQ
Y
D
34
0
$4
.
0
0
$1
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$6
.
3
0
$2
,
1
4
2
.
0
0
$5
.
3
5
$1,819.00$6.50$2,210.00
24
0
25
7
5
.
5
1
1
MU
L
C
H
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
,
T
Y
P
E
6
TO
N
1.
2
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
8
2
0
.
2
1
$2,184.25$80.00$96.00
24
1
25
7
5
.
5
2
3
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
B
L
A
N
K
E
T
S
C
A
T
E
G
O
R
Y
3
SQ
Y
D
20
0
$3
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$1
.
7
5
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$2
.
1
4
$428.00$2.00$400.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
F
-
W
E
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$2
4
2
,
4
0
4
.
7
5
$2
4
1
,
9
4
2
.
2
8
$2
4
5
,
2
3
2
.
3
4
$222,039.50
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
G
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
1
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
)
24
2
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$100.00$2,000.00$2,000.00
24
3
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
6"
X
6
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
1
$2
7
.
0
0
$2
7
.
0
0
$2
2
8
.
0
0
$2
2
8
.
0
0
$2
4
4
.
1
2
$244.12$100.00$100.00
24
4
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
6"
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
45
$2
6
.
0
0
$1
,
1
7
0
.
0
0
$5
9
.
7
0
$2
,
6
8
6
.
5
0
$6
3
.
9
2
$2,876.40$26.00$1,170.00
24
5
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
6"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
2
6
LI
N
F
T
19
0
$2
5
.
0
0
$4
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$2
6
.
1
0
$4
,
9
5
9
.
0
0
$2
7
.
9
5
$5,310.50$22.00$4,180.00
24
6
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
29
0
$2
9
.
0
0
$8
,
4
1
0
.
0
0
$1
0
.
2
5
$2
,
9
7
2
.
5
0
$3
.
1
6
$916.40$10.50$3,045.00
24
7
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
1
$3
0
.
0
0
$3
0
.
0
0
$0
.
9
9
$0
.
9
9
$2
1
.
4
1
$21.41$1.00$1.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
G
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
1
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
)
:
$1
4
,
5
8
7
.
0
0
$1
1
,
8
4
6
.
9
9
$9,468.83 $10,496.00
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
H
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
2
(
E
A
S
T
B
R
I
D
G
E
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
24
8
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
5
5
.
7
4
$2,055.74$2,000.00$2,000.00
24
9
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
49
0
$2
.
5
0
$1
,
2
2
5
.
0
0
$2
.
1
0
$1
,
0
2
9
.
0
0
$3
.
8
9
$1,906.10$1.75$857.50
25
0
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
17
0
$6
.
0
0
$1
,
0
2
0
.
0
0
$7
.
4
5
$1
,
2
6
6
.
5
0
$1
0
.
7
1
$1,820.70$12.00$2,040.00
25
1
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
17
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
7
0
.
0
0
$6
.
5
0
$1
1
0
.
5
0
$1
0
.
7
1
$182.07$12.00$204.00
25
2
21
0
5
.
5
2
5
TO
P
S
O
I
L
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
32
$1
0
.
0
0
$3
2
0
.
0
0
$1
1
.
7
5
$3
7
6
.
0
0
$2
1
.
4
1
$685.12$20.00$640.00
25
3
21
1
2
.
6
0
4
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
46
0
$1
.
0
0
$4
6
0
.
0
0
$1
.
7
5
$8
0
5
.
0
0
$2
.
1
4
$984.40$1.00$460.00
25
4
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
24
0
$1
2
.
0
0
$2
,
8
8
0
.
0
0
$1
9
.
9
6
$4
,
7
9
0
.
4
0
$1
9
.
9
2
$4,780.80$14.00$3,360.00
25
5
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
25
$2
.
5
0
$6
2
.
5
0
$3
.
0
9
$7
7
.
2
5
$3
.
0
8
$77.00$2.50$62.50Page 8of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Re
d
s
t
o
n
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
R
o
g
e
r
s
)
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price Unit PriceTotal Price
25
6
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
46
$5
3
.
0
0
$2
,
4
3
8
.
0
0
$6
2
.
9
8
$2
,
8
9
7
.
0
8
$6
2
.
8
5
$2,891.10$74.00$3,404.00
25
7
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
1
2
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
70
$4
8
.
0
0
$3
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$5
8
.
7
7
$4
,
1
1
3
.
9
0
$5
8
.
6
5
$4,105.50$66.00$4,620.00
25
8
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
15
0
$2
.
5
0
$3
7
5
.
0
0
$1
0
.
2
5
$1
,
5
3
7
.
5
0
$3
.
1
6
$474.00$10.50$1,575.00
25
9
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
1
$0
.
7
5
$0
.
7
5
$0
.
9
9
$0
.
9
9
$2
1
.
4
1
$21.41$1.00$1.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
H
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
2
(
E
A
S
T
B
R
I
D
G
E
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
:
$1
2
,
6
1
1
.
2
5
$1
8
,
0
0
4
.
1
2
$19,983.94 $19,224.00
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
I
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
3
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
26
0
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
1
1
1
.
9
5
$2,111.95$8,000.00$8,000.00
26
1
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
30
0
0
$2
.
5
0
$7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$2
.
1
0
$6
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
9
0
$11,700.00$1.75$5,250.00
26
2
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
11
0
0
$6
.
0
0
$6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$6
.
7
5
$7
,
4
2
5
.
0
0
$6
.
8
0
$7,480.00$6.50$7,150.00
26
3
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
11
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$5
.
0
0
$5
5
0
.
0
0
$5
.
5
1
$606.10$5.50$605.00
26
4
21
0
5
.
5
2
5
TO
P
S
O
I
L
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
19
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$1
1
.
7
5
$2
,
2
3
2
.
5
0
$1
3
.
9
2
$2,644.80$14.00$2,660.00
26
5
21
1
2
.
6
0
4
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
30
0
0
$1
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
.
7
5
$5
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$1
.
0
7
$3,210.00$1.00$3,000.00
26
6
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
15
0
0
$1
2
.
0
0
$1
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
3
.
2
1
$1
9
,
8
1
5
.
0
0
$1
3
.
1
9
$19,785.00$8.50$12,750.00
26
7
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
15
0
$2
.
5
0
$3
7
5
.
0
0
$2
.
5
8
$3
8
7
.
0
0
$2
.
5
7
$385.50$2.50$375.00
26
8
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
28
0
$5
3
.
0
0
$1
4
,
8
4
0
.
0
0
$5
6
.
4
3
$1
5
,
8
0
0
.
4
0
$5
6
.
3
2
$15,769.60$60.00$16,800.00
26
9
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
1
2
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
37
0
$4
8
.
0
0
$1
7
,
7
6
0
.
0
0
$4
9
.
6
0
$1
8
,
3
5
2
.
0
0
$4
9
.
5
0
$18,315.00$58.00$21,460.00
27
0
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
90
0
$2
.
5
0
$2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$2
.
8
5
$2
,
5
6
5
.
0
0
$3
.
1
6
$2,844.00$3.00$2,700.00
27
1
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
1
$0
.
7
5
$0
.
7
5
$0
.
9
9
$0
.
9
9
$2
1
.
4
1
$21.41$1.00$1.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
I
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
3
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
:
$7
4
,
8
2
5
.
7
5
$7
9
,
6
7
7
.
8
9
$84,873.36 $80,751.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
,
0
1
6
,
2
7
6
.
7
5
$9
4
5
,
5
0
9
.
8
0
$935,556.56 $979,993.50
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
B
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$3
6
2
,
8
4
7
.
0
0
$2
6
7
,
7
6
4
.
8
4
$296,596.43 $376,539.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
C
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$8
5
,
4
8
6
.
5
0
$8
3
,
3
6
5
.
4
0
$89,265.47 $104,634.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
D
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
2
1
,
4
2
1
.
0
0
$1
1
5
,
6
3
2
.
1
0
$121,305.14 $107,323.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
E
-
7
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
N
D
W
A
L
N
U
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$6
9
,
0
9
5
.
0
0
$8
6
,
2
6
9
.
9
6
$97,129.27 $95,434.50
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
F
-
W
E
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$2
4
2
,
4
0
4
.
7
5
$2
4
1
,
9
4
2
.
2
8
$245,232.34 $222,039.50
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
G
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
1
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
)
:
$1
4
,
5
8
7
.
0
0
$1
1
,
8
4
6
.
9
9
$9,468.83 $10,496.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
H
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
2
(
E
A
S
T
B
R
I
D
G
E
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
:
$1
2
,
6
1
1
.
2
5
$1
8
,
0
0
4
.
1
2
$19,983.94 $19,224.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
I
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
3
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
:
$7
4
,
8
2
5
.
7
5
$7
9
,
6
7
7
.
8
9
$84,873.36 $80,751.00
Page 9of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Burschville Construction, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Unit Price Total Price
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
1
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$3
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$185,000.00$185,000.00
2
21
0
1
.
5
0
1
CL
E
A
R
I
N
G
AC
R
E
0.
1
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3,000.00$300.00
3
21
0
1
.
5
0
2
CL
E
A
R
I
N
G
TR
E
E
20
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$450.00$9,000.00
4
21
0
1
.
5
0
6
GR
U
B
B
I
N
G
AC
R
E
0.
1
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3,000.00$300.00
5
21
0
1
.
5
0
7
GR
U
B
B
I
N
G
TR
E
E
20
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$250.00$5,000.00
6
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
C
U
R
B
A
N
D
G
U
T
T
E
R
LI
N
F
T
53
2
0
$3
.
5
0
$1
8
,
6
2
0
.
0
0
$2.35$12,502.00
7
21
0
4
.
5
0
3
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
68
0
$0
.
7
5
$5
1
0
.
0
0
$0.55$374.00
8
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
60
6
$6
.
5
0
$3
,
9
3
9
.
0
0
$5.25$3,181.50
9
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
48
8
$2
.
5
0
$1
,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$3.15$1,537.20
10
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
26
0
$2
.
5
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$3.15$819.00
11
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
SQ
Y
D
45
$8
.
5
0
$3
8
2
.
5
0
$6.30$283.50
12
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
S
I
G
N
EA
C
H
10
$3
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$26.50$265.00
13
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
EA
C
H
41
$2
0
.
0
0
$8
2
0
.
0
0
$16.50$676.50
14
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
EA
C
H
41
$1
0
.
0
0
$4
1
0
.
0
0
$5.50$225.50
15
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
EA
C
H
26
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$150.00$3,900.00
16
21
0
4
.
5
1
1
SA
W
I
N
G
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
(
F
U
L
L
D
E
P
T
H
)
LI
N
F
T
21
6
$4
.
5
0
$9
7
2
.
0
0
$5.00$1,080.00
17
21
0
4
.
5
1
3
SA
W
I
N
G
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
(
F
U
L
L
D
E
P
T
H
)
LI
N
F
T
34
9
$2
.
5
0
$8
7
2
.
5
0
$3.50$1,221.50
18
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
16
6
4
0
$6
.
0
0
$9
9
,
8
4
0
.
0
0
$3.15$52,416.00
19
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
31
9
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$3.15$10,048.50
20
21
0
5
.
5
2
2
SE
L
E
C
T
G
R
A
N
U
L
A
R
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
12
5
7
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
2
5
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$7.35$92,389.50
21
21
0
5
.
5
2
5
TO
P
S
O
I
L
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
85
6
$1
0
.
0
0
$8
,
5
6
0
.
0
0
$8.40$7,190.40
22
21
1
2
.
5
0
1
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
RO
A
D
S
T
A
62
.
7
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$9
,
4
0
5
.
0
0
$189.00$11,850.30
23
21
1
2
.
6
0
4
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
69
$1
.
0
0
$6
9
.
0
0
$6.30$434.70
24
21
2
3
.
6
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
S
W
E
E
P
E
R
(
W
I
T
H
P
I
C
K
U
P
B
R
O
O
M
)
HO
U
R
67
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$8
,
3
7
5
.
0
0
$105.00$7,035.00
25
21
3
0
.
5
0
1
WA
T
E
R
M
G
A
L
L
O
N
S
13
6
$3
0
.
0
0
$4
,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$26.25$3,570.00
26
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
98
7
0
$1
2
.
0
0
$1
1
8
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$8.40$82,908.00
27
23
0
1
.
6
0
3
MU
D
J
A
C
K
I
N
G
(
C
U
R
B
)
LI
N
F
T
34
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$3
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$10.00$3,400.00
28
23
3
1
.
6
0
4
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
R
E
C
L
A
M
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
25
2
0
0
$2
.
5
0
$6
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4.20$105,840.00
29
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
12
7
8
$2
.
5
0
$3
,
1
9
5
.
0
0
$2.70$3,450.60
30
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
23
8
0
$5
3
.
0
0
$1
2
6
,
1
4
0
.
0
0
$56.00$133,280.00
31
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
1
2
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
31
2
0
$4
8
.
0
0
$1
4
9
,
7
6
0
.
0
0
$52.00$162,240.00
32
23
6
0
.
5
0
3
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
3
.
0
"
T
H
I
C
K
SQ
Y
D
40
8
$2
5
.
0
0
$1
0
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$17.00$6,936.00
33
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
)
EA
C
H
5
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$700.00$3,500.00
34
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
)
EA
C
H
2
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1,000.00$2,000.00Page 10of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Burschville Construction, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Unit Price Total Price
35
25
2
1
.
5
0
1
4"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
44
0
0
$3
.
5
0
$1
5
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$4.00$17,600.00
36
25
3
1
.
5
0
1
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
B
6
1
8
LI
N
F
T
53
2
0
$1
0
.
5
0
$5
5
,
8
6
0
.
0
0
$15.60$82,992.00
37
25
3
1
.
5
0
7
6"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
39
4
$4
0
.
0
0
$1
5
,
7
6
0
.
0
0
$40.50$15,957.00
38
25
3
1
.
5
0
7
7"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
6
$4
5
.
0
0
$2
7
0
.
0
0
$65.00$390.00
39
25
3
1
.
5
0
7
6"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
H
E
SQ
Y
D
39
4
$4
2
.
0
0
$1
6
,
5
4
8
.
0
0
$42.75$16,843.50
40
25
3
1
.
5
0
7
7"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
H
E
SQ
Y
D
6
$4
7
.
0
0
$2
8
2
.
0
0
$67.00$402.00
41
25
3
1
.
6
0
2
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
C
U
R
B
R
A
M
P
EA
C
H
5
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$260.00$1,300.00
42
25
3
1
.
6
0
4
7"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
SQ
Y
D
45
$5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$53.00$2,385.00
43
25
3
1
.
6
1
8
TR
U
N
C
A
T
E
D
D
O
M
E
S
SQ
F
T
48
$3
5
.
0
0
$1
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$32.00$1,536.00
44
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
IN
S
T
A
L
L
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
(
C
L
U
S
T
E
R
)
EA
C
H
20
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$80.00$1,600.00
45
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
MA
I
L
B
O
X
EA
C
H
67
$4
0
.
0
0
$2
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$80.00$5,360.00
46
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
MA
I
L
B
O
X
(
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
)
EA
C
H
67
$3
5
.
0
0
$2
,
3
4
5
.
0
0
$20.00$1,340.00
47
25
6
3
.
6
0
1
TR
A
F
F
I
C
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$9
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$9
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$10,300.00$10,300.00
48
25
6
4
.
5
3
1
SI
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
S
T
Y
P
E
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
SQ
F
T
20
$3
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$42.00$840.00
49
25
6
4
.
5
3
1
F&
I
S
I
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
S
T
Y
P
E
C
SQ
F
T
15
1
$3
0
.
0
0
$4
,
5
3
0
.
0
0
$34.00$5,134.00
50
25
6
4
.
6
0
2
F&
I
S
I
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
T
Y
P
E
D
EA
C
H
16
$3
2
.
0
0
$5
1
2
.
0
0
$340.00$5,440.00
51
25
6
4
.
6
0
2
SA
L
V
A
G
E
A
N
D
R
E
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
S
I
G
N
EA
C
H
2
$5
0
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$130.00$260.00
52
25
6
5
.
6
0
3
4"
N
O
N
-
M
E
T
A
L
L
I
C
C
O
N
D
U
I
T
LI
N
F
T
12
0
$1
5
.
0
0
$1
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$10.00$1,200.00
53
25
7
1
.
5
0
2
DE
C
I
D
U
O
U
S
T
R
E
E
2
.
5
"
C
A
L
B
&
B
TR
E
E
20
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$325.00$6,500.00
54
25
7
3
.
5
0
2
SI
L
T
F
E
N
C
E
,
T
Y
P
E
H
E
A
V
Y
D
U
T
Y
LI
N
F
T
50
$2
.
5
0
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$4.50$225.00
55
25
7
3
.
5
4
0
FI
L
T
E
R
L
O
G
T
Y
P
E
C
O
M
P
O
S
T
L
O
G
LI
N
F
T
48
0
$2
.
5
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$2.80$1,344.00
56
25
7
3
.
6
0
2
TE
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
R
O
C
K
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
EA
C
H
9
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$750.00$6,750.00
57
25
7
5
.
5
0
1
SE
E
D
I
N
G
AC
R
E
0.
1
$4
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$4
8
0
.
0
0
$1,000.00$100.00
58
25
7
5
.
5
0
2
SE
E
D
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
2
4
0
PO
U
N
D
7
$2
.
5
0
$1
7
.
5
0
$3.00$21.00
59
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
73
0
1
$2
.
5
0
$1
8
,
2
5
2
.
5
0
$2.55$18,617.55
60
25
7
5
.
5
2
3
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
B
L
A
N
K
E
T
S
C
A
T
E
G
O
R
Y
3
SQ
Y
D
43
0
$3
.
0
0
$1
,
2
9
0
.
0
0
$1.05$451.50
61
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
22
5
$0
.
7
5
$1
6
8
.
7
5
$0.60$135.00
62
25
7
5
.
5
6
0
HY
D
R
A
U
L
I
C
S
O
I
L
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
5
PO
U
N
D
25
2
0
$1
.
0
0
$2
,
5
2
0
.
0
0
$0.71$1,789.20
63
25
8
2
.
5
0
2
12
"
S
O
L
I
D
L
I
N
E
W
H
I
T
E
-
E
P
O
X
Y
LI
N
F
T
96
$1
.
0
0
$9
6
.
0
0
$10.50$1,008.00
64
25
8
2
.
5
0
3
CR
O
S
S
W
A
L
K
M
A
R
K
I
N
G
-
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
(
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
)
SQ
F
T
11
0
$5
.
0
0
$5
5
0
.
0
0
$15.75$1,732.50
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
,
0
1
6
,
2
7
6
.
7
5
$1,123,707.95
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
B
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
65
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
E
W
E
R
P
I
P
E
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
)
LI
N
F
T
21
4
0
$1
2
.
0
0
$2
5
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$4.00$8,560.00
66
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
P
I
P
E
LI
N
F
T
11
2
0
$4
.
0
0
$4
,
4
8
0
.
0
0
$2.00$2,240.00
67
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
EA
C
H
11
$8
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$400.00$4,400.00Page 11of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Bu
r
s
c
h
v
i
l
l
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
I
n
c
.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price
68
21
0
4
.
6
0
3
RE
M
O
V
E
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
D
R
O
P
LI
N
F
T
7
$2
5
.
0
0
$1
7
5
.
0
0
$50.00$350.00
69
21
0
4
.
6
0
3
AB
A
N
D
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
LI
N
F
T
45
$1
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$30.00$1,350.00
70
24
5
1
.
6
0
9
GR
A
N
U
L
A
R
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
/
O
R
B
E
D
D
I
N
G
TO
N
76
0
$1
3
.
5
0
$1
0
,
2
6
0
.
0
0
$9.50$7,220.00
71
25
0
3
.
6
0
1
SA
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
B
Y
P
A
S
S
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$2
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$30,000.00$30,000.00
72
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
EA
C
H
7
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$4
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$900.00$6,300.00
73
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
S
(
S
A
N
)
EA
C
H
3
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$1,350.00$4,050.00
74
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
RE
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
69
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$300.00$20,700.00
75
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
F
O
R
C
E
M
A
I
N
EA
C
H
1
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$2,500.00$2,500.00
76
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
EX
C
A
V
A
T
E
T
O
L
O
C
A
T
E
S
E
W
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
69
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$2
4
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$400.00$27,600.00
77
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
8"
X
4
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
5
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$100.00$500.00
78
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
8"
X
6
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
1
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$120.00$120.00
79
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
10
"
X
4
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
21
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$185.00$3,885.00
80
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
12
"
X
6
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
2
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$240.00$480.00
81
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
15
"
X
4
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
7
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$7
0
0
.
0
0
$300.00$2,100.00
82
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
15
"
X
6
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
1
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$355.00$355.00
83
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
10
"
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
60
$4
5
.
0
0
$2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$75.00$4,500.00
84
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
16
"
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
20
$8
5
.
0
0
$1
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$102.00$2,040.00
85
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
LI
N
I
N
G
S
E
W
E
R
P
I
P
E
1
2
"
LI
N
F
T
44
0
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$5
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$46.50$20,460.00
86
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
4"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
2
6
LI
N
F
T
11
2
4
$2
5
.
0
0
$2
8
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$15.00$16,860.00
87
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
4"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
2
6
(
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
)
LI
N
F
T
17
2
0
$2
0
.
0
0
$3
4
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$10.00$17,200.00
88
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
6"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
2
6
LI
N
F
T
19
1
$2
7
.
0
0
$5
,
1
5
7
.
0
0
$16.50$3,151.50
89
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
SA
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
(
T
E
L
E
V
I
S
I
N
G
)
LI
N
F
T
22
6
0
$1
.
2
5
$2
,
8
2
5
.
0
0
$1.50$3,390.00
90
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
8"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
3
5
LI
N
F
T
54
0
$2
8
.
0
0
$1
5
,
1
2
0
.
0
0
$30.00$16,200.00
91
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
10
"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
3
5
LI
N
F
T
99
0
$3
5
.
0
0
$3
4
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$36.00$35,640.00
92
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
15
"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
3
5
LI
N
F
T
61
0
$3
8
.
0
0
$2
3
,
1
8
0
.
0
0
$44.00$26,840.00
93
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
CH
I
M
N
E
Y
S
E
A
L
EA
C
H
16
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$150.00$2,400.00
94
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
CA
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
)
EA
C
H
10
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$850.00$8,500.00
95
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
RE
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
S
EA
C
H
1
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$2,000.00$2,000.00
96
25
0
6
.
6
0
3
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
1
0
"
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
D
R
O
P
LI
N
F
T
4
$2
8
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
2
0
.
0
0
$1,150.00$4,600.00
97
25
0
6
.
6
0
3
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
1
5
"
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
D
R
O
P
LI
N
F
T
4
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1,675.00$6,700.00
98
25
0
6
.
6
0
3
CO
N
S
T
4
8
"
D
I
A
S
A
N
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
LI
N
F
T
10
0
$2
3
5
.
0
0
$2
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$196.00$19,600.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
B
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$3
6
2
,
8
4
7
.
0
0
$312,791.50
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
C
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
99
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
LI
N
F
T
14
1
$6
.
5
0
$9
1
6
.
5
0
$10.00$1,410.00
10
0
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
H
Y
D
R
A
N
T
EA
C
H
6
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$500.00$3,000.00Page 12of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Bu
r
s
c
h
v
i
l
l
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
I
n
c
.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price
10
1
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
C
U
R
B
S
T
O
P
&
B
O
X
EA
C
H
10
$7
5
.
0
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$150.00$1,500.00
10
2
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
&
B
O
X
EA
C
H
14
$1
2
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$150.00$2,100.00
10
3
21
0
5
.
5
1
5
EX
P
L
O
R
A
T
O
R
Y
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
EA
C
H
3
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$650.00$1,950.00
10
4
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
EX
C
A
V
A
T
E
T
O
L
O
C
A
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
10
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$400.00$4,000.00
10
5
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
EA
C
H
16
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$1
0
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1,000.00$16,000.00
10
6
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
3
$1
7
0
.
0
0
$5
1
0
.
0
0
$300.00$900.00
10
7
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
HY
D
R
A
N
T
EA
C
H
6
$2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3,250.00$19,500.00
10
8
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
AD
J
U
S
T
V
A
L
V
E
B
O
X
EA
C
H
5
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$275.00$1,375.00
10
9
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
1"
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
T
O
P
EA
C
H
1
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$125.00$125.00
11
0
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
6"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
17
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1,475.00$25,075.00
11
1
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
1"
C
U
R
B
S
T
O
P
&
B
O
X
EA
C
H
3
$2
2
0
.
0
0
$6
6
0
.
0
0
$150.00$450.00
11
2
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
R
E
P
A
I
R
EA
C
H
12
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$275.00$3,300.00
11
3
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
1"
T
Y
P
E
K
C
O
P
P
E
R
P
I
P
E
LI
N
F
T
60
$1
7
.
0
0
$1
,
0
2
0
.
0
0
$27.00$1,620.00
11
4
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
6"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
13
2
$3
5
.
0
0
$4
,
6
2
0
.
0
0
$35.00$4,620.00
11
5
25
0
4
.
6
0
4
4"
P
O
L
Y
S
T
Y
R
E
N
E
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
14
0
$2
2
.
0
0
$3
,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$36.00$5,040.00
11
6
25
0
4
.
6
0
8
DU
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
S
PO
U
N
D
20
0
0
$5
.
7
5
$1
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$2.50$5,000.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
C
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$8
5
,
4
8
6
.
5
0
$96,965.00
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
D
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
11
7
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
E
W
E
R
P
I
P
E
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
LI
N
F
T
95
0
$8
.
0
0
$7
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$8.00$7,600.00
11
8
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
1
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$250.00$250.00
11
9
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
O
R
C
A
T
C
H
B
A
S
I
N
EA
C
H
15
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$6
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$300.00$4,500.00
12
0
24
5
2
.
6
0
2
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
A
D
D
L
E
EA
C
H
1
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$1,500.00$1,500.00
12
1
25
0
1
.
6
0
2
TR
A
S
H
G
U
A
R
D
F
O
R
3
0
"
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$450.00$450.00
12
2
25
0
1
.
6
0
2
TR
A
S
H
G
U
A
R
D
F
O
R
4
2
"
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$700.00$700.00
12
3
25
0
1
.
6
0
2
30
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
W
/
P
I
L
I
N
G
EA
C
H
1
$8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2,500.00$2,500.00
12
4
25
0
2
.
5
4
1
4"
P
E
R
F
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
D
R
A
I
N
LI
N
F
T
80
$1
5
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$15.00$1,200.00
12
5
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
12
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
V
LI
N
F
T
89
$2
7
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
3
.
0
0
$24.25$2,158.25
12
6
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
15
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
V
LI
N
F
T
27
6
$2
8
.
0
0
$7
,
7
2
8
.
0
0
$26.00$7,176.00
12
7
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
21
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
I
I
I
LI
N
F
T
32
0
$3
6
.
0
0
$1
1
,
5
2
0
.
0
0
$31.00$9,920.00
12
8
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
30
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
I
I
I
LI
N
F
T
10
0
$5
2
.
0
0
$5
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$47.00$4,700.00
12
9
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
36
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
I
I
I
LI
N
F
T
28
$8
5
.
0
0
$2
,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$70.00$1,960.00
13
0
25
0
3
.
5
7
3
RE
P
A
I
R
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
EA
C
H
3
$5
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$1,500.00$4,500.00
13
1
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
EA
C
H
9
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$5
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1,000.00$9,000.00
13
2
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
EA
C
H
4
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$2,000.00$8,000.00
13
3
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
ST
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
(
T
E
L
E
V
I
S
I
N
G
)
LI
N
F
T
81
2
$1
.
5
0
$1
,
2
1
8
.
0
0
$1.50$1,218.00Page 13of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Burschville Construction, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Unit Price Total Price
13
4
25
0
6
.
5
0
1
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
4
8
-
4
0
2
0
LI
N
F
T
37
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$9
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$285.00$10,545.00
13
5
25
0
6
.
5
0
1
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
6
0
-
4
0
2
0
LI
N
F
T
40
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$290.00$11,600.00
13
6
25
0
6
.
5
0
1
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
1
EA
C
H
10
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1,175.00$11,750.00
13
7
25
0
6
.
5
1
6
CA
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
(
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
)
EA
C
H
6
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$850.00$5,100.00
13
8
25
0
6
.
5
1
6
CA
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
(
C
A
T
C
H
B
A
S
I
N
)
EA
C
H
3
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$530.00$1,590.00
13
9
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
EA
C
H
37
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$350.00$12,950.00
14
0
25
1
1
.
5
1
5
GE
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
F
A
B
R
I
C
T
Y
P
E
I
V
SQ
Y
D
9
$3
.
0
0
$2
7
.
0
0
$10.00$90.00
14
1
25
1
1
.
6
0
9
FI
E
L
D
S
T
O
N
E
R
I
P
R
A
P
C
L
A
S
S
I
V
TO
N
17
$1
1
0
.
0
0
$1
,
8
7
0
.
0
0
$80.00$1,360.00
14
2
25
7
3
.
5
3
0
ST
O
R
M
D
R
A
I
N
I
N
L
E
T
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
EA
C
H
45
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$5
,
6
2
5
.
0
0
$100.00$4,500.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
D
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
2
1
,
4
2
1
.
0
0
$126,817.25
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
E
-
7
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
N
D
W
A
L
N
U
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
14
3
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$5,000.00$5,000.00
14
4
21
0
1
.
5
0
2
CL
E
A
R
I
N
G
TR
E
E
3
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$450.00$1,350.00
14
5
21
0
1
.
5
0
7
GR
U
B
B
I
N
G
TR
E
E
3
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$250.00$750.00
14
6
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
C
U
R
B
A
N
D
G
U
T
T
E
R
LI
N
F
T
30
0
$3
.
5
0
$1
,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$2.63$789.00
14
7
21
0
4
.
5
0
3
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
11
0
0
$0
.
7
5
$8
2
5
.
0
0
$0.53$583.00
14
8
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
20
0
$2
.
5
0
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$3.15$630.00
14
9
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
SQ
Y
D
32
$8
.
5
0
$2
7
2
.
0
0
$6.30$201.60
15
0
21
0
4
.
5
1
3
SA
W
I
N
G
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
(
F
U
L
L
D
E
P
T
H
)
LI
N
F
T
30
0
$2
.
5
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$3.50$1,050.00
15
1
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
23
0
$6
.
0
0
$1
,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$6.30$1,449.00
15
2
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
45
$1
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$6.30$283.50
15
3
21
0
5
.
5
2
2
SE
L
E
C
T
G
R
A
N
U
L
A
R
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
60
$1
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$10.50$630.00
15
4
21
0
5
.
5
2
5
TO
P
S
O
I
L
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
14
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
4
0
.
0
0
$12.60$176.40
15
5
21
2
3
.
6
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
S
W
E
E
P
E
R
(
W
I
T
H
P
I
C
K
U
P
B
R
O
O
M
)
HO
U
R
5
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$6
2
5
.
0
0
$105.00$525.00
15
6
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
32
$1
2
.
0
0
$3
8
4
.
0
0
$10.00$320.00
15
7
22
3
2
.
5
0
1
MI
L
L
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
(
2
.
0
"
)
SQ
Y
D
40
0
0
$2
.
5
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2.50$10,000.00
15
8
23
0
1
.
6
0
3
MU
D
J
A
C
K
I
N
G
(
C
U
R
B
)
LI
N
F
T
20
$1
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$25.00$500.00
15
9
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
26
0
$2
.
5
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$2.70$702.00
16
0
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
36
0
$5
3
.
0
0
$1
9
,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$59.00$21,240.00
16
1
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
1
2
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
34
$4
8
.
0
0
$1
,
6
3
2
.
0
0
$64.55$2,194.70
16
2
25
0
3
.
5
4
1
12
"
R
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
3
0
0
6
C
L
A
S
S
V
LI
N
F
T
10
$2
7
.
0
0
$2
7
0
.
0
0
$50.00$500.00
16
3
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
I
N
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
EA
C
H
1
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$2,000.00$2,000.00
16
4
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
R
E
P
A
I
R
EA
C
H
1
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$275.00$275.00
16
5
25
0
6
.
5
0
1
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
1
LI
N
F
T
1
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$1,525.00$1,525.00
16
6
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
)
EA
C
H
1
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$700.00$700.00Page 14of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Burschville Construction, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Unit Price Total Price
16
7
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
EA
C
H
2
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$700.00$1,400.00
16
8
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
CH
I
M
N
E
Y
S
E
A
L
EA
C
H
1
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$150.00$150.00
16
9
25
2
1
.
5
0
1
4"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
11
0
0
$3
.
5
0
$3
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$4.00$4,400.00
17
0
25
3
1
.
5
0
1
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
B
6
1
8
LI
N
F
T
30
0
$1
0
.
5
0
$3
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$16.00$4,800.00
17
1
25
3
1
.
6
0
2
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
C
U
R
B
R
A
M
P
EA
C
H
2
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$275.00$550.00
17
2
25
3
1
.
6
0
4
7"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
SQ
Y
D
45
$5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$50.00$2,250.00
17
3
25
3
1
.
6
1
8
TR
U
N
C
A
T
E
D
D
O
M
E
S
SQ
F
T
16
$3
5
.
0
0
$5
6
0
.
0
0
$35.00$560.00
17
4
25
5
0
.
5
5
2
FL
A
S
H
E
R
S
I
G
N
A
L
EA
C
H
2
$3
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$6
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$8,250.00$16,500.00
17
5
25
6
3
.
6
0
1
TR
A
F
F
I
C
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$500.00$500.00
17
6
25
6
4
.
5
3
1
F&
I
S
I
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
S
T
Y
P
E
C
SQ
F
T
13
$3
0
.
0
0
$3
9
0
.
0
0
$34.00$442.00
17
7
25
7
1
.
5
0
2
DE
C
I
D
U
O
U
S
T
R
E
E
2
.
5
"
C
A
L
B
&
B
TR
E
E
3
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$325.00$975.00
17
8
25
7
3
.
5
3
0
ST
O
R
M
D
R
A
I
N
I
N
L
E
T
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
EA
C
H
3
$1
2
5
.
0
0
$3
7
5
.
0
0
$100.00$300.00
17
9
25
7
3
.
5
4
0
FI
L
T
E
R
L
O
G
T
Y
P
E
C
O
M
P
O
S
T
L
O
G
LI
N
F
T
20
$2
.
5
0
$5
0
.
0
0
$4.50$90.00
18
0
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
13
0
$2
.
5
0
$3
2
5
.
0
0
$11.00$1,430.00
18
1
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
4
$0
.
7
5
$3
.
0
0
$1.05$4.20
18
2
25
8
2
.
5
0
1
PA
V
E
M
E
N
T
M
E
S
S
A
G
E
(
L
E
F
T
A
R
R
O
W
)
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
-
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
EA
C
H
6
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$9
0
0
.
0
0
$450.00$2,700.00
18
3
25
8
2
.
5
0
1
PA
V
E
M
E
N
T
M
E
S
S
A
G
E
(
R
I
G
H
T
A
R
R
O
W
)
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
-
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
EA
C
H
3
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$450.00$1,350.00
18
4
25
8
2
.
5
0
1
PA
V
E
M
E
N
T
M
E
S
S
A
G
E
(
T
H
R
U
A
R
R
O
W
)
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
-
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
EA
C
H
1
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$450.00$450.00
18
5
25
8
2
.
5
0
2
4"
S
O
L
I
D
L
I
N
E
W
H
I
T
E
-
E
P
O
X
Y
LI
N
F
T
80
0
$0
.
2
5
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1.05$840.00
18
6
25
8
2
.
5
0
2
12
"
S
O
L
I
D
L
I
N
E
W
H
I
T
E
-
E
P
O
X
Y
LI
N
F
T
24
$1
.
0
0
$2
4
.
0
0
$10.50$252.00
18
7
25
8
2
.
5
0
2
4"
D
O
U
B
L
E
S
O
L
I
D
L
I
N
E
Y
E
L
L
O
W
-
E
P
O
X
Y
LI
N
F
T
90
0
$0
.
5
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$2.10$1,890.00
18
8
25
8
2
.
5
0
3
CR
O
S
S
W
A
L
K
M
A
R
K
I
N
G
-
P
O
L
Y
P
R
E
F
O
R
M
(
G
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
)
SQ
F
T
26
0
$5
.
0
0
$1
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$13.65$3,549.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
E
-
7
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
ND
W
A
L
N
U
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$6
9
,
0
9
5
.
0
0
$98,756.40
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
F
-
W
E
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
18
9
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$8
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$25,000.00$25,000.00
19
0
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
LI
N
F
T
23
0
$5
.
0
0
$1
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$10.00$2,300.00
19
1
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
E
W
E
R
P
I
P
E
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
LI
N
F
T
13
2
$8
.
0
0
$1
,
0
5
6
.
0
0
$8.00$1,056.00
19
2
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
P
I
P
E
LI
N
F
T
80
$5
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$2.00$160.00
19
3
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
37
0
$2
.
5
0
$9
2
5
.
0
0
$3.15$1,165.50
19
4
21
0
4
.
5
0
9
RE
M
O
V
E
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
6
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$150.00$900.00
19
5
21
0
4
.
5
1
3
SA
W
I
N
G
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
(
F
U
L
L
D
E
P
T
H
)
LI
N
F
T
25
0
$3
.
5
0
$8
7
5
.
0
0
$3.50$875.00
19
6
21
0
4
.
5
2
3
SA
L
V
A
G
E
S
I
G
N
EA
C
H
11
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$26.50$291.50
19
7
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
29
0
0
$7
.
0
0
$2
0
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$3.15$9,135.00
19
8
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
29
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$2
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$3.15$913.50
19
9
21
0
5
.
5
2
2
SE
L
E
C
T
G
R
A
N
U
L
A
R
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
24
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$2
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$7.35$17,640.00Page 15of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Bu
r
s
c
h
v
i
l
l
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
I
n
c
.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price
20
0
21
1
2
.
5
0
1
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
RO
A
D
S
T
A
14
.
6
5
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
6
6
2
.
5
0
$189.00$2,768.85
20
1
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
23
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$2
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$8.40$19,320.00
20
2
23
3
1
.
6
0
4
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
R
E
C
L
A
M
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
47
0
0
$5
.
0
0
$2
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$4.20$19,740.00
20
3
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
31
0
$1
.
5
0
$4
6
5
.
0
0
$2.70$837.00
20
4
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
81
0
$5
6
.
0
0
$4
5
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$58.50$47,385.00
20
5
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
81
0
$2
0
.
0
0
$1
6
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$53.00$42,930.00
20
6
25
0
1
.
5
1
1
15
"
C
M
P
I
P
E
C
U
L
V
E
R
T
LI
N
F
T
13
2
$3
0
.
0
0
$3
,
9
6
0
.
0
0
$26.00$3,432.00
20
7
25
0
1
.
5
1
5
15
"
C
M
P
I
P
E
A
P
R
O
N
EA
C
H
6
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$225.00$1,350.00
20
8
25
0
2
.
5
4
1
6"
P
E
R
F
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
D
R
A
I
N
LI
N
F
T
16
0
$1
6
.
0
0
$2
,
5
6
0
.
0
0
$16.00$2,560.00
20
9
25
0
3
.
5
1
1
8"
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
20
$4
3
.
0
0
$8
6
0
.
0
0
$65.00$1,300.00
21
0
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
S
(
S
A
N
)
EA
C
H
1
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$6,500.00$6,500.00
21
1
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
RE
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
1
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$300.00$300.00
21
2
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
CH
I
M
N
E
Y
S
E
A
L
S
EA
C
H
5
$2
2
5
.
0
0
$1
,
1
2
5
.
0
0
$150.00$750.00
21
3
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
8"
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
D
R
O
P
LI
N
F
T
15
$2
2
5
.
0
0
$3
,
3
7
5
.
0
0
$200.00$3,000.00
21
4
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
TE
L
E
V
I
S
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
LI
N
F
T
80
$2
.
0
0
$1
6
0
.
0
0
$3.50$280.00
21
5
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
8"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
3
5
LI
N
F
T
92
$3
5
.
0
0
$3
,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$30.00$2,760.00
21
6
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1,000.00$1,000.00
21
7
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
CO
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
EA
C
H
2
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$300.00$600.00
21
8
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
AD
J
U
S
T
V
A
L
V
E
B
O
X
EA
C
H
4
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$275.00$1,100.00
21
9
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
4"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$1,150.00$1,150.00
22
0
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
6"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1,275.00$1,275.00
22
1
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
8"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$1
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$1,630.00$1,630.00
22
2
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
12
"
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$2,600.00$2,600.00
22
3
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
HY
D
R
A
N
T
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
EA
C
H
1
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3,200.00$3,200.00
22
4
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
4"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
30
$2
8
.
0
0
$8
4
0
.
0
0
$33.50$1,005.00
22
5
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
6"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
6
$3
0
.
0
0
$1
8
0
.
0
0
$70.00$420.00
22
6
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
8"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
60
$3
4
.
0
0
$2
,
0
4
0
.
0
0
$40.00$2,400.00
22
7
25
0
4
.
6
0
3
12
"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
-
D
U
C
T
I
R
O
N
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
29
0
$5
0
.
0
0
$1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$54.25$15,732.50
22
8
25
0
4
.
6
0
8
DU
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
S
PO
U
N
D
10
0
0
$3
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2.00$2,000.00
22
9
25
0
6
.
5
1
6
CA
S
T
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
EA
C
H
1
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$850.00$850.00
23
0
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
EA
C
H
4
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$700.00$2,800.00
23
1
25
0
6
.
6
0
3
CO
N
S
T
4
8
"
D
I
A
S
A
N
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
LI
N
F
T
12
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$210.00$2,520.00
23
2
25
6
3
.
6
0
1
TR
A
F
F
I
C
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$750.00$750.00
23
3
25
6
4
.
5
3
1
SI
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
S
T
Y
P
E
C
SQ
F
T
26
.
2
5
$4
5
.
0
0
$1
,
1
8
1
.
2
5
$34.00$892.50
23
4
25
6
4
.
6
0
2
F&
I
S
I
G
N
P
A
N
E
L
T
Y
P
E
D
EA
C
H
2
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$340.00$680.00Page 16of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Bu
r
s
c
h
v
i
l
l
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
I
n
c
.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price
23
5
25
7
5
.
5
0
1
SE
E
D
I
N
G
AC
R
E
0.
7
$3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
5
0
.
0
0
$1,000.00$700.00
23
6
25
7
5
.
5
0
2
SE
E
D
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
2
4
0
PO
U
N
D
30
$5
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$3.00$90.00
23
7
25
7
5
.
5
0
2
SE
E
D
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
2
6
0
PO
U
N
D
50
$8
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$3.25$162.50
23
8
25
7
5
.
5
0
2
SE
E
D
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
2
7
0
PO
U
N
D
50
$1
0
.
0
0
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$3.45$172.50
23
9
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
L
A
W
N
SQ
Y
D
34
0
$4
.
0
0
$1
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$6.65$2,261.00
24
0
25
7
5
.
5
1
1
MU
L
C
H
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
,
T
Y
P
E
6
TO
N
1.
2
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$70.00$84.00
24
1
25
7
5
.
5
2
3
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
B
L
A
N
K
E
T
S
C
A
T
E
G
O
R
Y
3
SQ
Y
D
20
0
$3
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$1.85$370.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
F
-
W
E
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$2
4
2
,
4
0
4
.
7
5
$261,094.35
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
G
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
1
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
)
24
2
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1,500.00$1,500.00
24
3
25
0
3
.
6
0
2
6"
X
6
"
P
V
C
W
Y
E
EA
C
H
1
$2
7
.
0
0
$2
7
.
0
0
$500.00$500.00
24
4
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
6"
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
C
L
5
2
LI
N
F
T
45
$2
6
.
0
0
$1
,
1
7
0
.
0
0
$32.50$1,462.50
24
5
25
0
3
.
6
0
3
6"
P
V
C
P
I
P
E
S
E
W
E
R
-
S
D
R
2
6
LI
N
F
T
19
0
$2
5
.
0
0
$4
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$20.00$3,800.00
24
6
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
29
0
$2
9
.
0
0
$8
,
4
1
0
.
0
0
$11.00$3,190.00
24
7
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
1
$3
0
.
0
0
$3
0
.
0
0
$1.05$1.05
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
G
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
1
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
)
:
$1
4
,
5
8
7
.
0
0
$10,453.55
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
H
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
2
(
E
A
S
T
B
R
I
D
G
E
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
24
8
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$2,500.00$2,500.00
24
9
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
49
0
$2
.
5
0
$1
,
2
2
5
.
0
0
$3.15$1,543.50
25
0
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
17
0
$6
.
0
0
$1
,
0
2
0
.
0
0
$8.40$1,428.00
25
1
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
17
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
7
0
.
0
0
$10.50$178.50
25
2
21
0
5
.
5
2
5
TO
P
S
O
I
L
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
32
$1
0
.
0
0
$3
2
0
.
0
0
$12.60$403.20
25
3
21
1
2
.
6
0
4
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
46
0
$1
.
0
0
$4
6
0
.
0
0
$1.58$726.80
25
4
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
24
0
$1
2
.
0
0
$2
,
8
8
0
.
0
0
$13.13$3,151.20
25
5
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
25
$2
.
5
0
$6
2
.
5
0
$3.25$81.25
25
6
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
46
$5
3
.
0
0
$2
,
4
3
8
.
0
0
$66.00$3,036.00
25
7
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
1
2
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
70
$4
8
.
0
0
$3
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$62.00$4,340.00
25
8
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
15
0
$2
.
5
0
$3
7
5
.
0
0
$11.00$1,650.00
25
9
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
1
$0
.
7
5
$0
.
7
5
$1.05$1.05
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
H
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
2
(
E
A
S
T
B
R
I
D
G
E
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
:
$1
2
,
6
1
1
.
2
5
$19,039.50
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
I
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
3
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
26
0
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$2,500.00$2,500.00
26
1
21
0
4
.
5
0
5
RE
M
O
V
E
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
SQ
Y
D
30
0
0
$2
.
5
0
$7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$2.63$7,890.00
26
2
21
0
5
.
5
0
1
CO
M
M
O
N
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
CU
Y
D
11
0
0
$6
.
0
0
$6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$6.30$6,930.00
26
3
21
0
5
.
5
0
7
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
C
A
V
A
T
I
O
N
(
E
V
)
CU
Y
D
11
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$6.30$693.00Page 17of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
M
O
N
T
-
2
0
1
1
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Bu
r
s
c
h
v
i
l
l
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
I
n
c
.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total Price
26
4
21
0
5
.
5
2
5
TO
P
S
O
I
L
B
O
R
R
O
W
(
C
V
)
CU
Y
D
19
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$12.60$2,394.00
26
5
21
1
2
.
6
0
4
SU
B
G
R
A
D
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
SQ
Y
D
30
0
0
$1
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$0.80$2,400.00
26
6
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
15
0
0
$1
2
.
0
0
$1
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$9.98$14,970.00
26
7
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
15
0
$2
.
5
0
$3
7
5
.
0
0
$2.70$405.00
26
8
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
28
0
$5
3
.
0
0
$1
4
,
8
4
0
.
0
0
$60.00$16,800.00
26
9
23
6
0
.
5
0
2
TY
P
E
S
P
1
2
.
5
N
O
N
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
37
0
$4
8
.
0
0
$1
7
,
7
6
0
.
0
0
$52.00$19,240.00
27
0
25
7
5
.
5
0
5
SO
D
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
S
A
L
T
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
SQ
Y
D
90
0
$2
.
5
0
$2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$3.00$2,700.00
27
1
25
7
5
.
5
3
2
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
T
Y
P
E
2
PO
U
N
D
1
$0
.
7
5
$0
.
7
5
$1.05$1.05
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
I
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
3
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
:
$7
4
,
8
2
5
.
7
5
$76,923.05
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
,
0
1
6
,
2
7
6
.
7
5
$1,123,707.95
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
B
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$3
6
2
,
8
4
7
.
0
0
$312,791.50
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
C
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$8
5
,
4
8
6
.
5
0
$96,965.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
D
-
E
A
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
2
1
,
4
2
1
.
0
0
$126,817.25
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
E
-
7
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
N
D
W
A
L
N
U
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$6
9
,
0
9
5
.
0
0
$98,756.40
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
F
-
W
E
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$2
4
2
,
4
0
4
.
7
5
$261,094.35
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
G
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
1
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
)
:
$1
4
,
5
8
7
.
0
0
$10,453.55
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
H
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
2
(
E
A
S
T
B
R
I
D
G
E
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
:
$1
2
,
6
1
1
.
2
5
$19,039.50
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
I
-
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
E
N
O
.
3
(
E
L
L
I
S
O
N
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
)
:
$7
4
,
8
2
5
.
7
5
$76,923.05
I
h
er
e
b
y
c
e
r
t
i
f
y
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
i
s
a
n
e
x
a
c
t
r
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
i
d
s
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
.
Cer
t
i
f
i
e
d
B
y
:
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
N
o
.
41
8
6
0
Da
t
e
:
J
u
n
e
3
,
2
0
1
1
Page 18of 18
01
4
9
4
-
4
2
-
P
r
o
jec
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
6/6/2011
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
s
b
1
0
/
R
t
A
E
C
/
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
/
r
p
t
_Ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
.
a
s
p
?
W
o
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
I
D
=
6
0
4
7
&
E
n
gin
e
e
r
E
s
t
=
Y
&
N
u
m
P
e
r
P
a
ge=
4
&
C
a
t
e
gor
y=Y
Engineering Planning Environmental Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
Minneapolis St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
K:\01494-42\Admin\Construction Admin\LetterofRecommendation.doc
June 13, 2011
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: 2011 Street Reconstruction Program
City of Monticello
City Project No. 11C001
WSB Project No. 1494-42
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Bids were received for the above-referenced project on Thursday, June 2, 2011, and were opened
and read aloud. Four bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and
tabulated. A copy of the Bid Tabulation and a Bid Summary is attached.
The project included a Base Bid and three Alternate Bids as summarized below:
BASE BID: Includes street and utility improvements to Area 4B (East River Street); 7th Street
and Walnut Street intersection improvements; and West River Street improvements.
ALTERNATE 1: Ellison Park sanitary sewer service.
ALTERNATE 2: East Bridge Park parking lot reconstruction.
ALTERNATE 3: Ellison Park parking lot reconstruction.
A summary of the bid results indicates that Redstone Construction Company, Inc. submitted the
low bid for this project for the Base Bid as well as the Base Bid plus all of the Alternate Bids.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
June 3, 2011
Page 2
K:\01494-42\Admin\Construction Admin\LetterofRecommendation.doc
Engineer’s
Estimate
Redstone Construction
Company, Inc.
Base Bid
$1,897,531.00 $1,740,484.38
Alternate #1
• Ellison Park Sanitary Service
$14,587.00 $11,846.99
Alternate #2
• East Bridge Park Parking Lot
$12,611.25 $18,004.12
Alternate #3
• Ellison Park Parking Lot
$74,825.75 $79,677.89
It appears that Redstone Construction Company, Inc. is the low bidder for the Base Bid and any
combination of the Alternate Bids awarded. Based on the results of the bids received and current
competitive bidding market, we recommend that the City Council consider these bids and award
a contract to Redstone Construction Company, Inc.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Shibani K. Bisson, PE
Senior Project Manager
Enclosure
cc: Bruce Westby, City of Monticello
Jeff O’Neill, City of Monticello
Stephen Johnson, Redstone Construction Co., Inc.
City CouncilAgenda:6/13/11
1
8.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-51acceptingproposalandawardinga
contractfor2011StreetLightingImprovementsfor7th StreetEast,CityProjectNo.
11C002 (BW)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
OnMay23,2011,CouncilauthorizedpreparationofaRequestforProposals(RFP’s)for
biddinga2011StreetLightingImprovementsprojecton7th StreetEastbetweenCedar
StreetandtheUnionCrossingsdevelopment.Thepurposeofthisprojectistoenhance
existingstreetlighting,whichconsistsofstreetlightslocatedatmajorintersections,and
toprovidelightingforthepedestrianpathwaynorthof7th Street.
Uponcompletionoftheproject,lightinglevelsalong7th StreetEastandtheadjacent
pedestrianpathwaywillbesignificantlybrighterthanexistinglightlevelson7th Street
East,aswellasonnearbystreets.Thisisduetothedesiretoenhancethelightingat
intersectionsandpedestrian/vehicleconflictpointsincludingwherethepathwaycrosses
vehicleaccesspoints.
Attachedassupportingdataisalayoutoftheproposedlightingimprovements,aswellas
cutsheetsoftheproposedlightingfixtures,assemblies,andservicecabinets.
ByadoptingResolutionNo.2011-51Councilwillaccepttheattachedproposalfrom
WrightHennepinServicesforconstructingandmaintainingtheproposed2011Street
LightingImprovementsfor7th StreetEast.
PerCouncildirection,theproposed2011StreetLightingImprovementsincorporatelight
emittingdiode(LED)lightfixtures,similartothe2010StreetLightingImprovements
alongSchoolBoulevardbetweenFenningandEdmonsonAvenueswhichwasthefirst
LEDlightingprojectinstalledbytheCity.
Theproposedlightingsystemconsistsofatotalof34lightassembliesincluding11
stand-alonestreetlights,19streetlightswithbacksidepedestrianlighting,and4stand-
alonepedestrianlights.Thestreetlightassembliesconsistof130-wattLEDrectilinear
(non-ornate)fullcut-offlightfixturesmountedon6-footmastarmsatop25-foottall
aluminumpoleswithscrew-inbases.Wherestreetlightsareadjacenttopedestrian
pathwaysa33-wattrectilinearfullcut-offlightfixturewillbemountedonthebacksideof
thelightpolesataheightof15-feetusing2-footmastarms.Whereonlypathway
lightingisneeded,15-foottallaluminumpoleswillbeinstalledonscrew-inbaseson
whicha50-wattrectilinearfullcut-offlightfixturewillbemountedataheightof15-feet
using2-footmastarms.
Councildirectedstafftodesignthe2011lightingimprovementsusingourstandardpole
spacing/lightinglevelsasfoundonsimilarstreetsandpathwaysthroughouttheCity.
Thisprovidesforamaximumpolespacingof350-feet,withpolesbeingstaggered
betweenalternatingsidesofthestreetwherepractical.Aswaspreviouslydiscussed,we
werenotabletoalternatepolesbetweenthetwosidesof7th Streetasregularlyaswe
City CouncilAgenda:6/13/11
2
normallywouldsincemanypropertiessouthof7th Streetareundeveloped,becausethe
pedestrianpathwayisonthenorthsideof7th street,andsincetherearemoreaccesseson
thenorthsidethanthereareonthesouthside.Therefore,byplacinglightsmore
regularlyalongthenorthsidewewillprovidebetterstreetandpathwaylightingneareach
oftheaccesses,therebyincreasingvisibilityandsafetyforbothmotoristsandpedestrians
atthesenaturalconflictpoints.
PerpreviousCouncildirection,theproposeddesignincorporatesnon-ornamentalstyle
fixtureandpoledesigns,similartothelightassembliesinstalledalongtheeastendof
East7th StreetbytheUnionCrossingsdevelopment.Theselightfixturesprovidefullcut-
offlightingforbothstreetsandpedestrianpathways.Elevationviewsofthethree
proposedstreetandpathwaylightassembliesareattachedassupportingdata,asare
picturesoftheexistinglightassembliesbyUnionCrossings.
Onpreviousstreetlightingimprovementprojects,staffpreparedandsubmittedRFP’sto
XcelEnergyandWrightHennepinServicessincetheseweretheonlycompaniesthathad
thecapabilitytodesignandbuildthesystem,thenprovideuswithamaintenancecontract
formaintainingit.However,similartolastyearweareproposingtouseLEDlight
fixturesforthisprojectsostaffagainconferredwiththetwocompaniesandfoundthat
onlyWrightHennepinServiceswaswillingtoprovideamaintenancecontractforLED
lighting.AssuchanRFPwassubmittedsolelytoWrightHennepinServices.
Assessmentsarenotbeingproposedforanyportionofthisprojectbecauseintersection
lightingalreadyexistsalong7th StreetEastbetweenFallonAvenueandCedarStreet,and
becausetheadjacentpropertiesincludeawidevarietyofusesincludingundeveloped,
commercial,multiple-dwellingunits(MDU’s),andSaintHenry’schurch,manyofwhich
wouldlikelyreceivelittletonobenefitfromtheproposedimprovements.
A1.BudgetImpact:WrightHennepinServicesisproposingtoconstructandmaintainthe
2011StreetLightingImprovementsforthefollowingcosts:
Constructioncosts=$264,585
Maintenancecosts=$10.25/monthper25’streetlight=$112.75/month
$11.00/monthper25’combinationlight=$209.00/month
$9.00/monthper15’pathwaylight=$36.00/month
TotalMonthlyMaintenanceCosts=$357.75/month
Thecontractorwillberequiredtorepairanyirrigationlinesthataredamagedduring
constructionoftheimprovements,whichcouldcostupto$1,000basedonrepairsneeded
duringpreviousimprovementprojectswithsimilarscopesofwork.Inaddition,the
contractorisalsorequiredtorestoreallsurfaceareasincludingturfandpavements,which
couldcostupto$10,500.Thesecostswerenotincludedinthecontractor’sproposaland
willthereforeneedtobeaddedtotheauthorizedprojectcosts.Thetotalconstruction
costforthisprojectisthereforeestimatedtobe$276,085.
City CouncilAgenda:6/13/11
3
Councilshouldbeawarethattheconstructioncostsinclude$490toremovethebackside
pedestrianlightfromthepoleintheSEquadrantofFallonAvenueandSchoolBoulevard
thatwasinstalledwithlastyear’slightingproject.Thisisbeingdonetoreducethelevel
oflightingatthisintersection.ThisfixturewillbereturnedtoPublicWorkssoitcanbe
placedinourrepairinventory.
TheCitycurrentlyhasabout$917,000intheStreetLightImprovementFund,whichwas
generatedthroughtheCity’selectricfranchiseandisspecificallydesignatedforsuch
streetlightingimprovements.Staffproposestopayfortheproposedimprovementsfrom
thisfund.
MaintenancecostsforstreetlightsarebudgetedonanannualbasisthroughtheStreet
Department.AstheCitycontinuestoinstallmoreLEDlightingsystemsweshouldbe
abletodecreasethecontractedmaintenancecostsforLEDsystems,oreveneliminate
themaltogether.Thiswouldthenallowustocontractwithanelectricianonanannual
basisforallofourLEDlightingmaintenanceneeds.Staffwillcontinuetoexplorethis
optioninthefutureaswelearnmoreabouttheactualmaintenancecostsforLEDlighting
systems,andstaffwillensurethatallLEDlightingmaintenancecontractsincludeopt-out
clausestoallowtheCitytooptoutofthecontractifdesired.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:VariousstafffromtheEngineeringandPublicWorks
Departmentswillspendtimemanagingandinspectingworkonthisprojectbutthiswork
shouldnotinterferewithotherscheduledworktasks.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2011-51acceptingbidsandawardingacontractfor
the2011StreetLightingImprovementsfor7th StreetEast,CityProjectNo.11C002,
toWright-HennepinServicesintheamountof$264,585,includingmonthly
maintenancecostsintheamount$357.75.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolutionNo.2011-51atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1perthereasonsnotedherein.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
ResolutionNo.2011-51
RequestforProposal,minusattachments(4pgs)
ProposalfromWright-HennepinServices(6pgs)
2011StreetLightingImprovementsLayout
Elevationviewofproposedstreetandpathwaylightassemblies(3pgs)
ServiceCabinetdetailsheet
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTYMINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2011-51
ACCEPTINGPROPOSALSANDAWARDINGCONTRACT
2011STREETLIGHTINGIMPROVEMENTS
CITYPROJECTNO.11C002
WHEREAS,pursuanttoaRequestforProposalsforthe2011StreetLightingImprovements
project,proposalsfordesigning,constructingandmaintainingsaidimprovementswerereceived
andthefollowingbidswerefoundtocomplywiththeRequestforProposals:
CONTRACTORBIDS
DesignandConstructionMaintenance
Wright-HennepinServices $264,585$357.75/month
WHEREAS,thebidofWright-HennepinServicesofRockford,MNintheamountof$264,585
forthedesignandconstructionofsaid2011StreetLightingImprovements,inaccordancewith
theRequestforProposal,minussurfacerestorationandirrigationrepaircosts,shallbeand
herebyisaccepted;and,
WHEREAS,the2011surfacerestorationunitpricingsheetasattachedtothebidofWright-
HennepinServicesofRockford,MNforsaid2011StreetLightingImprovements,inaccordance
withtheRequestforProposal,shallbeandherebyisaccepted;
WHEREAS,thebidofWright-HennepinServicesofRockford,MNintheamountof$357.75
permonthforthemaintenanceofsaid2011StreetLightingImprovements,inaccordancewith
theRequestforProposal,shallbeandherebyisaccepted;
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHE
CITYOFMONTICELLO:
1.TheMayorandCityAdministratorareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoenterintoa
contractwithsaidbidderforthedesign,constructionandmaintenanceofsaid
improvements,forandonbehalfoftheCityofMonticello.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis13th dayofJune,2011.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
____________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
1
9.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-48supportingStateofMinnesota2012
bondingrequestasrelatedtoacquisitionofBertramChainofLakesproperty (AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityofMonticelloandWrightCountycontinuetoactivelypursueallavailable
fundingoptionsforthephasedacquisitionoftheBertramChainofLakesRegional
Park.AstheCouncilisaware,futurelandpurchasesatBertramdependonamodel
thatincludesathirdoftheacquisitioncostcomingfromStateofMinnesotasources.
Citystaff,alongwithWrightCountyParksAdministratorMarcMattice,continuesefforts
toapplytoallavailableDNRgrantsourcesforfutureacquisitions.Staffhasalsobeen
closelymonitoringtheallocationofCleanWater,LandandLegacyAmendmentfunds,
whichcontinuetoevolve.DuetocurrentbudgetstalematebetweentheStatelegislature
andtheGovernor,nofundingallocationshaveyetbeenmadeforupcominggrantcycles
forexistingDNRorLegacyprograms.StaffwillkeeptheCouncilupdatedasthose
opportunitiesbecomeavailable.
AsanothercomponentofacoordinatedStatefinancingapproach,Matticeismanaging
theefforttosecurefundingthroughthe2012"BondingBill."Councilisaskedto
considerapprovingaresolutionofsupportforthiseffort.TheCityCouncilapproveda
similarresolutionforthe2008and2010bondingcycles.Inrelationshiptothe2008
bondingeffort,Bertramwasastrongconsiderationforinclusioninthebondingbill,
butlastminutenegotiationsontheoverallbilllefttheprojectoutofthefinalversion.
Pleasenotethatenteringarequestforfundingviathe2012bondingbilldoesnot
obligatetheCity,butdoesindicateageneralintentofpayingforaportionofthecost
oftheacquisitioninaccordancewiththeapprovedMemorandumofUnderstanding
andagreementwithWrightCounty.
ApprovalofthisresolutionwouldbeconsistentwithpreviousactionofCouncilto
supportworkingcooperativelywiththeCountyinfundingthispurchase.
Asafinalnote,Councilwillhavearequestforactionona2011acquisitionatBertramon
theJune27th,2011agenda.
A1.BudgetImpact:Iftherequestfor2012bondingappropriationsissuccessful,the
CityandCountywouldthenconsidermovingforwardwithafourthpurchase.The
sizeoftheacquisitionwoulddependonthebondingallocationamount.Wright
CountyParksAdministratorMarcMatticeintendstorequest$6.1million,which
isthefullremainingpurchaseamount.Thisamountassumesathirdphase
acquisitionin2011orearly2012andincludespotential2011grantawards
(submittedinMarch2011)andmatch.
IfthebondingappropriationsincludeallorpartoftheremainingStateshareof
thepurchasecost,theCity'swouldneedtoformallyseektheabilitytofinanceits
shareofthematchunderapartnershipwithWrightCounty.Thispartnership
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
2
previouslyallowedtheCitytomakeannualpaymentstotheCountyinanamount
nottoexceed$475,000untiltheacquisitioncostispaidinfull.Potentialrevenue
sourcesforthisexpensecontinuetobecashfrompotentialsaleoftheremaining
JeffersonCommonspropertyaswellasdollarsderivedfromcontinuingpayments
intotheParkDedicationFund.Fundsderivedfromthesesourceswouldlaterbe
repaidviaparkdedicationfeescomingfromfuturedevelopment.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffimpactswouldincludeassistinginthedistribution
ofinformationtolocallegislatorsregardingtheprojectandbilllanguageand
possibleassistanceincoordinatinganyon-siteeventsattheparkforinterested
legislators.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-48insupportofaStateofMinnesota2012
bondingrequestasrelatedtoacquisitionoftheBertramChainofLakesProperty.
2.MotiontodenyResolution#2011-48insupportofaStateofMinnesota2012
bondingrequest.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1above.Staffsupportsadoptionoftheresolution.
ParticipationbytheStateiscriticaltothefinancialpackageforacquisitionoftheBertram
property.PotentialinclusionofthispurchaseintheStatebondingbillrepresentsthenext
stepinjointeffortstosecureadditionalStatefunding.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2011-48
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2011-48
SUPPORTING2012STATEOFMINNESOTABONDINGREQUESTFOR
STATEAPPROPRIATIONSFORCAPITALIMPROVEMENTS
FORBERTRAMCHAINOFLAKESLANDACQUISITION
BEITRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticello,inconjunctionwiththeWrightCountyBoard
ofCommissioners,supporttheapplicationforStateAppropriationsforCapitalImprovements
tobesubmittedandthatMarcMattice,WrightCountyParksAdministrator,ishereby
authorizedtosubmittherequestforthe2012CapitalBudget;and
BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thatWrightCountyhasthefinancialcapabilitytomeetthe
matchrequirementandproperacquisitionoftheproposedproject;and
BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thatuponapprovalofitsapplicationbytheState,Wright
CountymayenterintoanagreementwiththeStateofMinnesotaforregionalparkland
acquisitionandthatWrightCountycertifiesthatitwillcomplywithallapplicablelawsand
regulationsasstatedinthebondingrequest.
NOW,THEREFOREBEITRESOLVED thatMarcMattice,WrightCountyParks
Administrator,isherebyauthorizedtoexecutesuchagreementsasarenecessaryto
implementtheprojectonbehalfoftheapplicant.
ADOPTEDBY theCityCouncilofMonticello,Minnesotaonthe13th dayofJune,2011.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
__________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
1
10.ConsiderationofrequestbyPaxmarLLCforareductioninWACandSACfeesfor
2011 (AS,JO,TK,BW)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilhasreceivedarequestfromPAXMARDevelopmentforreductionin
SewerAccessChargesandWaterAccessChargesforresidentialbuildingpermitsfor
bothmultiandsinglefamilyunits.
PAXMAR,anAnoka-basedrealestate/developmentfirm,acquiredtheremaininglotsat
SunsetPondsandtheremaininglotsanddevelopablepropertyatCarlisleVillageinApril
of2011.StaffhadtheopportunitytomeetwithrepresentativesofPAXMARinlateMay
todiscussthecompany’sgoalsforthetwoprojects,aswellasthePUDandZoning
Ordinancedesignstandardsforthetwodevelopments.
Intheirrequestforpermitfeereduction,PAXMARhasnotindicatedaspecificamount
ofreductionrequested,butdidciteexamplesofreductionsgiveninothercommunities
andindicatedthatthereductionscreatedincreasedpermitactivityforthosecommunities.
PAXMARrepresentativesindicatedthatareductioninfeeswouldincreasethelikelihood
oftheirabilitytoselllotsforbuildingconstructioninMonticelloversusanother
community,althoughnocommitmentwasmadeinthatregard.
ANALYSIS
DevelopmentStatus
AsofDecember,2010,therewereapproximately64vacantlotsinCarlisleVillage,of
whichthereare47single-family(26R-A)and17multi-familylots.Thereisstill
propertytobefinalplattedatCarlisle.Thatpropertywasapprovedatpreliminaryplatas
multi-familyunits.
AsofDecember2010,therewereapproximately118vacantlotsinSunsetPonds,of
which46aresingle-familylotsand72multi-familylots.
LotPricing
AsPAXMARisalreadytheownerofthepropertiesatCarlisleVillageandSunsetPonds,
theyhavecompletedthenecessarycalculationsfordevelopingasaleablepriceforlotsin
relationshiptotheirinvestmentandthemarket.Indiscussionswithstaff,PAXMAR
representativesindicatedthattheirrequestisbasedontheideathatthelowerthepriceof
thelot,themoreattractivethelotsaretopotentialbuildersandultimatelybuyerstryingto
financeamortgage.
ArandomsampleofcurrentvacantlotvaluationsbasedonCountyAssessorinformation
isattachedforreference.
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
2
BuildingPermitCosts
Withtheaboveunderstandingonthelotpricingaspect,CouncilwillnotethatMonticello
isverycompetitiveinpermitcostsrelativetoothersurroundingcommunities.Infact,
basedonarecentsurveyofsurroundingcommunities,Monticelloisalreadysignificantly
lowerthanothercommunitiesintotalpermitcostsfora$150,000home.Thisfactor
obviouslyplaysaroleintotaldevelopmentcostsforMonticellolots.
CommunityPermitReductionPrograms
Staffdidmakecontactwiththreecommunitieswhohaveputresidentialpermitfee
reductionprogramsinplace.Eachofthreecommunitieshadaslightlydifferentopinion
ontheoutcomeoftheprograms.
Annandaleisinthemidstoftheirprogram,whichwaslaunchedinJanuaryofthis
year.Theirprogramprovidesa25%reductioninbothWACandSACfees,butis
onlyapplicabletosituationsinwhichmultiplepermitsarepulledandthenis
appliedasacredit.MoreinformationonAnnandale’sprogramisattached.
Annandale’sprogramappliedtosingle-familyhomepermits.Annandalewillbe
evaluatingresultsoftheprogramatyear-end.
TheCityofBigLakeranaresidentialincentiveprogramfromMarch1st,2010
throughJune30th,2010.Therebateprogramoffereda$4000rebatetobuildersof
single-familyhomesdirectlyfromthegeneralfund.Although27newhome
permitswerepulledduringthattime,BigLakehasdecidednottocontinuethe
program.Therationaleforthatdecisionwasthattherebateprogramcreateda
singleyearnetlossofover$125,000tothegeneralfund,andthatactualpermit
impactwasdifficulttotracedirectlybacktotheprogramitself.
ClearLakehashadaresidentialpermitfeereductionprograminplaceforfour
yearsandevaluatestheprogramannually.To-date,theprogramhasresultedin8
newresidentialpermits.Again,theprogramwasapplicableonlytosingle-family
homeconstruction.Theirprogramprovidesa$1000reductioninWAC,aswell
asareductioninparkdedicationandinspectionandhook-upchargesforatotal
reductionof$2000perpermit.IndiscussingtheprogramwithClearLake’sCity
Clerk,itwasexplainedthatClearLakeviewedtheprogramasanopportunityto
fundtheirSewerAccessFund,whichhasalargedebtservicepayment.TheCity
keptSACfeesattheirrequiredrate.Bygeneratingpermitactivity,additional
SACfeeswerepaidintothefundthatmightotherwisenothaveoccurredinthose
fouryears.
Fees/SystemandFundBalances
For2011,Monticello’sSACrateforasingleresidentialunitis$4,030.TheWACrateis
$801(basedonastandard1”waterservice).Theseratesaresetthroughadetailedstudy
ofsystemoperationsandmaintenance,futurecapitalexpenditures,fundbalances,and
debtservicecostsforboththesanitarysewerandwatersystems.Thestudyandfeesare
updatedannuallybytheCity’sEngineeringDepartment.However,duetoslowgrowth,
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
3
CityCouncilhaselectednottoincreasethesefeesthelasttwoyears.Thefeesreflect
actualcostsforcontinueddevelopmentofthewaterandsewersystemfortheCity.
Currently,theWaterAccessFundhasacashbalanceof$521,592.63.Thisfundhas
commitmentstofundaportionoftheannualdebtpaymentsforthe2005and2010
ImprovementBonds.Basedonthesecommitmentsandconservativegrowthprojections,
theWaterAccessFundwillbeoutofcashin2012.
TheSanitarySewerAccessFundalsohascommittedtofundingaportionofthe2005and
2010ImprovementBondsalongwith50%ofthewastewatertreatmentplantdebt.The
SanitarySewerAccessFundhasacurrentcashbalanceof$3,965,319.45andusingthe
samegrowthprojectionwillbeoutofcashin2014.
The2005ImprovementBondmaturesin2015,withthe2010ImprovementBond
maturingin2021.TheWasteWaterTreatmentPlantdebtmaturesin2018.TheWater
andSanitarySewerAccessFunds’shareofdebtwillneedtobepaideitherthrougha
futurepropertytaxlevyorincreasedwaterandsewerrates.
Thefundprojectionsareattachedforreference.
Cost/Benefit
TherearebothdirectandindirectbenefitsandcoststotheCityasrelatedtoincreased
residentialpermitactivity.
First,theCitywouldbenefitfromresultingpropertytaxincreasesfromnewhomeson
existingvacantlots.Attachedforreferencearerandom2011propertytaxstatementsfor
bothCarlisleVillageandSunsetPonds,forbothvacantandbuiltsingle-familyresidential
properties.Thispotentialforincreasedrevenuepresumesthattheprogramwillresultin
buildingthatwouldnothaveoccurredotherwise.
AtCarlisleVillage,avacantpropertymaygenerallygeneratesomewherebetween$250-
300inCitypropertytaxesannually.AdevelopedlotinCarlislewillgeneratebetween
$700-900inadditionalpropertytaxrevenueoncebuilt-out.InSunsetPonds,avacant
single-familylotiscurrentlygenerating$200-250inannualpropertytaxrevenue.The
increaseinpropertytaxrevenueonabuiltlotinSunsetcanbeexpectedtorangefrom
$400-600annually
Forreference,inCarlisleVillage,a3,400squarefootrambler(unfinishedbasement)ona
1/3acrelotintheR-Aportionofthedevelopmentwillgenerate$1,117.18inCity
propertytaxesannually.Anapproximately2,600squarefoottwo-storyhomeona¼acre
lotinSunsetPondswillgenerate$767.00.
Asidefromincreasedpropertytaxrevenues,otherindirectbenefitsincludeincreased
employmentbase,andincreasedeconomicactivityatlocalshops,restaurantsandother
serviceestablishments.AccordingtotheNationalAssociationofRealtors,thesaleof
onemedianpricedhomegenerates$30,792inothereconomicactivity.
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
4
Itshouldbenotedthattheincreaseinpropertytaxrevenueforanynewhomeisoffsetby
theservices(snowplowing,garbageservices,policeandfireprotection,etc)providedto
newresidents.Infact,asnotedinBigLake’sanalysis,assessmentsofthecost-revenue
impactsformunicipalservicesgenerallyshowthatresidentiallandusesgeneratehigher
expenditurespersquarefootforservicethanotherlanduses,suchascommercialor
industrial.
Anotherindirectcostisthefactthataddinghomesincreasesdemandtotheexistingwater
andsewersystems,whichwillinthefuturerequireincreasingsystemcapacity.WAC,
SACandtrunkfeesareusedtopayforthisincreasedcapacityandwithoutthepayment
ofWAC/SACfees,theCitywillneedtofindotherfundingsourcesforthese
improvements.Assuch,thishasadirectimpacttoallpropertyownersandtaxpayers.
AlternativesforConsideration
OnealternativeforCounciltoconsideristoallowtheassessmentofallWACandSAC
fees,similartocommercialandindustrialproperties.Thiswouldrequireaseparate
agreementwithPAXMARforallremaininglotsandwouldrequiresomeadministration
relatedtorecordingandtrackingofassessments.Thedownsidetothisisalllotswould
havetobeassessedatonceinsteadofwhensoldorapermitisissued.Theupsideisit
spreadsoutpaymentsandinterestratesarestillverylow.
Thesecondalternativewouldbetoofferaflatpercentagefeereductionsimilarto
Annandale’sprogram,at25%.Inlieuofacreditorrebateprogram,thiswouldprovide
theleastamountofadministrationandthemostimmediateimpactfor
builders/PAXMAR.Theprogramcouldbestructuredasapilotonlyforthisconstruction
season,toendNovember1,2011.IftheCouncilisinterestedinprovidingsometypeof
incentiveprogram,staffwouldfirstrecommendlimitingtheprogramonlytosingle-
familyresidentialpermits.ThisisconsistentwiththeCity’sobjectivesforgrowthand
createsthehighestlevelofreturnforpotentialreductionintermsofincreasedproperty
taxrevenue.Staffwouldalsorecommendopeningthereductiontoallbuildersforlotsin
alldevelopments.
ThecriticalconsiderationwouldbetheshortageoffundsthatalreadyexistintheAccess
Funds.Itwouldbestaff’srecommendationthatifanincentivealternativeisapproved
thattheAccessFundswouldbemadewholebyincludingitaspartofthe2012property
taxlevy.Staffwouldtrackthenumberofpermitsissuedunderthisprogramandthen
provideCouncilwiththetotalexpenditure,whichwouldbepresentedasanincreased
levyamountforrepaymentbacktothosefundsin2012.
Theoretically,iftheCouncilapproveda25%reduction,theWACfeeforasingle-family
permitwouldbereducedto$700.75andtheSACfeereducedto$3022.50,fora
combinedreduction$1,207.75perpermit.If25newsingle-familyhomepermitswere
pulledduringthepilotprogram,thiswouldresultina$30,193.75netlossimpactanda
propertytaxlevyintheGeneralFund,whichwouldthentransferthefundstotheproper
AccessFunds.Asnotedabove,staffwouldrecommenda2012generallevyincreasein
thatamounttocovertheloss.
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
5
IfCouncilweretolookattheincreasedpropertytaxrevenueresultingfromthese25new
homesasthebasisforthelevyincrease,itwouldtakealittleover5yearstorepaythe
generalfund.
TheCityhasalreadyassumedacertainlevelofriskbasedonthecurrentpolicyofspecial
assessmentofresidentialtrunkchargesfornewdevelopment,adoptionofvariousspecial
assessmentagreementswhichdeferpayment,andallowingforspecialassessmentof
SAC/WACandtrunkchargeswithpastcommercial/industrial/institutionalprojects.
ThereisthepotentialforasignificantbudgetimpactiftheCouncilelectstofunda
reductionwiththegenerallevy.Itwillbecriticalthatiftheprogramisfundedinthis
manner,anannualallocationisfundedinordertoproperlyrepaythefundstomaintain
thesystem.
Withtheaboveinformationinhand,alternativesforactionforbeenpreparedforreview
andconsiderationbytheCityCouncil.Councilcan,ofcourse,alteranyofthesebased
ondiscussion.
A1.BudgetImpact:IfCouncilweretoapproveapilotsingle-familyresidential
permitfeereductionprogram,thesourceofthereductionwouldbeafuture
propertytaxlevyintheGeneralFundandwouldbeincludedinthebudget.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:IfCouncilapprovesthepilotprogram,staffworkload
wouldincludetrackingofthereductionexpendituresbypermitandgeneral
administrationrelativetopermitcalculations.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motionofnoaction.
Thismotionwouldeffectivelyleavefeesasstatedinthe2011AdoptedFee
Scheduleandwouldprovidenospecializedincentiveprogramasrequestedby
PAXMAR.
2.MotiontoapproveaSingle-FamilyResidentialPermitReductionPilotProgram
asoutlinedbelow:
a.ProgramtorunfromJune15th,2011–November1st,2011
b.Reductionwouldincludea25%reductioninbothWACandSACfees.
c.Programwouldapplytoanydevelopmentandanybuilderwithinthe
CityofMonticelloforsingle-familyhomeconstructiononly.
d.Programwillberepaidbyanincreaseinthe2012GeneralFund
PropertyTaxLevycommensuratethereductionexpendituresand
transferintotheWaterandSewerAccessFunds.
3.MotiontoapprovetheassessmentofSAC/WACfeesperlotbyseparate
agreementwithPAXMARdevelopment.
CityCouncilAgenda:06/13/11
6
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecognizesthatapotentialfeereductionprogramforresidentialpermitsisapolicy
decisionfortheCityCouncil.However,Citystaffdoeshavesomeconcernswitha
potentialfeereductionforresidentialpermitsbasedonthefollowingconsiderations.
Asnotedwithinthereport,Monticello’sbuildingpermitcostsarealreadylowerthan
surroundingcommunities,whichgivesbuyerslookingatMonticelloacompetitive
advantageintotaldevelopmentcost.
Additionally,CouncilhasadoptedapolicyofholdingdownanyGeneralFundlevy
increases.ThereductionofSAC/WACfor2011buildingpermittingwillultimately
requiretherepaymentofthesesystemcosts,morethanlikelythroughtheGeneralFund
andalevyincrease.Withoutthatrepayment,thefundswillsuffersetbacksintermsof
fundbalancesandtheabilitytofundneededinfrastructure.
Finally,staffbelievesthatasPAXMARonlyrecentlyacquiredtheproperty,thecompany
waswellawareofthepricingstructureneededtosupportthemarketingandsaleofthe
lots.AnyadditionalreductionbytheCityisunnecessary.Thereisnodemonstrated
evidenceoreconomicdatafromthedevelopersayingthatfundinggapexiststhatis
limitinghousingdevelopmentandthatthecityincentivewillclosethatgap.Dropping
theWAC/SACfeesasproposedbythedevelopermaybeseenasaneffortto“buythe
favor”ofthedevelopertopointbuilderstoMonticello.
TheCityisaskedtoprovideareductionincostsbasedonthehopethatthisincentivewill
stimulatehousingdevelopment.Althoughitwouldbegreattoseethelotsdevelop
soonerversuslater,thereisnoevidencethatthelotswouldnotdevelopwithoutthe
subsidy.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.PAXMARLetterofRequest
B.BuildingPermitFeeComparison
C.BuildingPermitActivityComparison
D.BuildingPermitActivity–MonticelloTrendReport
E.AnnandaleNewHomeConstructionIncentiveMemo
F.BigLake2010SingleFamilyHomeBuilderRebateProgram
G.FundBalanceProjections
H.CarlisleVillage&SunsetPonds2011PropertyTaxStatements
2011 FEE SCHEDULE FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES –BASED ON $150,000 VALUATION
Becker Big Lake Zimmerman Elk River Monticello St. Michael
Fee Table Used
1997 Fee
Schedule
1997 Fee
Schedule
1997 Fee
Schedule
1997 Fee
Schedule
106% of 1997
State
recommended
schedule
1997 State
recommended
schedule +
consumer index
increase
Building Permit Fee $ 1,273.75 $ 1,273.75 $ 1,273.75 $ 1,273.00 $ 1,350.38 $ 1,353.50
Plan Review Fee $ 827.94 $ 827.94 $ 827.94 $ 828.00 $ 877.75 $ 879.78
State Surcharge $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00
Sub Total $ 2,176.69 $ 2,176.69 $ 2,176.69 $ 2,176.00 $ 2,303.13 $ 2,308.28
Erosion Inspection Fee $ -$ -$ -$ 175.00 $ -$ -
Plumbing & Mechanical Permits $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -
WAC $ 2,977.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 5,500.00 $3,000.00 $ 840.00 $ 2,675.00
Water Meter Charge $ 294.00 $ 200.00 $ 470.00 $ -$ 352.69 $ 330.00
Water Connection Charge $ 100.00 $ 35.00 $ 110.00 $ 65.00 $ 127.00 $ 100.00
Sewer Connection Charge $ -$ 35.00 $ -$ 65.00 $ -$ 100.00
SAC $ 4,000.00 $ 4,855.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 4,201.00 $ 4,030.00 $ 4,712.00
Contractors License $ -$ 5.00 $ -$ 5.00 $ 25.00
$
5.00
Water/Sewer Excavation Permit $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50.00 $ -
Assessment Search Fee $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25.00 $ -
Utility Locate Fee $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 35.00 $ -
Landscape/lawn Escrow $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ -$ -$ 1,000.00
Sub Total $ 9,371.00 $ 10,380.00 $ 13,080.00 $ 7,511.00 $ 5,484.69 $ 8,922.00
Total Fees $ 11,547.69 $ 12,556.69 $ 15,256.69 $ 9,687.00 $ 7,787.82 $ 11,230.28
Notes: WAC Charges are being looked into to see which cities treat their water
Building Permits: Our Neighbors
Becker: 9 SF
First-time home-buyer credit
Big Lake: 27 SF
NSP
Rebate (6-month)
Buffalo: 4 SF
Elk River: 4 SF
Otsego: 73 SF
St. Michael: 15 SF
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
112
134
128
211
151
165
242
223
206
250 263
85
43
20
9
2
Single-Family Residential Building Permits by Year
(Attached and Detached)
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Mark Casey, City Administrator
RE: New Home Construction Incentive
DATE: March 21, 2011
In order to attract new home construction, staff is proposing the City adopt a policy to
waive 25% of the Water Availability Charge (WAC) and Sewer Availability Charge
(SAC) for four or more new homes built by a developer or builder between January 1,
2011 and December 31, 2011. The 25% reduction would be received as a credit for the
full WAC and SAC fees on the fourth building permit applied for in 2011. Any
subsequent building permits would receive a 25% reduction of the WAC and SAC fees.
In order to be eligible for this credit, the building permit applications must be received on
or before October 1, 2011.
Discount
WAC: 4 permits x $2,800 per unit = $11,200 - $2,800 discount
SAC: 4 permits x $4,100 per unit = $16,400 - $4,100 discount
Total Discount (WAC + SAC) of 4 permits = $6,900
The Annandale-Maple Lake-Howard Lake Wastewater Commission receives $3,500 of
the $4,100 SAC fee. The City would have to subsidize $425 of the Wastewater
Commission fees per home.
Revenue
Based on a $150,000 home, the City receives approximately $600 in annual taxes.
Based on Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) of 4,500 gallons per month, the City receives
approximately $780 in annual fees for water, sewer and storm water fees.
$600 in annual City taxes x 4 homes = $2,400 annual taxes
$780 in annual City utility fees x 4 homes = $3,120 annual utility fees
Total Estimated Revenue (taxes + utility fees) of 4 homes = $5,520
Discount vs. Revenue
Total Discount ($6,900) – Total Estimated Revenue ($5,520) = ($1,380)
Staff would recommend this incentive through December 31, 2011 and reevaluate for
2012 and beyond on a year by year basis.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
1
11.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-52acceptingbidsandawarding
contractforCSAH75PedestrianUnderpassandPathwayImprovements,City
ProjectNo.10C010 (BW/JO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilisbeingaskedtoadoptResolutionNo.2011-52acceptingbidsand
awardingacontractforconstructingtheCSAH75PedestrianUnderpassandPathway
Improvements,CityProjectNo.10C010,toR.L.LarsonExcavatingInc.intheamountof
$250,200.50.
OnMarch28,2011,Councilapprovedfinalplansandspecificationsandauthorized
advertisementforbidstobidthepedestrianunderpassandpathwayimprovementsasan
alternatebidtoWrightCounty’sCSAH75Realignmentproject(seeFigure1attached).
OnJune7th,WrightCountyreceivedatotalof5bids,whichwereverycompetitive.R.L.
LarsonExcavating,Inc.submittedthelowbasebidfortheCSAH75Realignmentproject
intheamountof$1,741,575.66.TheirbidfortheCity’sCSAH75PedestrianUnderpass
andPathwayImprovementswas$250,200.50.TheEngineer’sEstimatewas$292,243.80
soR.L.Larson’sbidwasnearly17%undertheestimate.AcopyofWrightCounty’sbid
abstractisattachedassupportingdata.
CouncilshouldnotethatR.L.Larson’sbidfortheunderpassimprovementswasnotthe
lowestbid.CentralSpecialties,Inc.submittedabidof$224,080.77,andKnifeRiver
submittedabidof225,688.08.However,sincetheCountywillonlyawardacontract
basedonthelowbasebidtheCitymustacceptR.L.Larson’sbidovertheotherlower
bids.
ProjectJustification–
ConstructingthepedestrianunderpassduringtherealignmentofCSAH75willallowus
tomaximizecostefficiencies.Theseefficiencieswillbeachievedthroughproject
coordinationwithWrightCountyandthecurrentconstructionprojectbiddingclimate.
Whiletheconstructionofthepondstofacilitatetheunderpasshaveincreasedthetotal
projectcostfrominitialexpectations,thepondingspecifiedisultimatelyneededinthis
areaandwillneedtobeconstructedatsometimetofacilitatefuturedevelopmentinthe
area.Byconstructingthepedestrianunderpassandpathwaysandassociatedstormwater
pondingfacilitiesatthistimetheCitywillbeinabetterpositiontoallowforfuture
commercialandresidentialgrowthinthearea,andforafuturetrailconnectiontothe
proposedregionaltrailtoClearwater.
IthaslongbeentheCity’sobjectivetoprovideasafe,grade-separatedpedestrian
crossingalongthewestendofCSAH75asisemphasizedintheParksandTrailsPlan.
Wenowhavetheopportunitytodosoatafractionofthecostofwhatitwouldcosttodo
soafterCSAH75isreconstructed,plusfundsareavailablewithouttappingreservesor
increasingthelevy.TheabilitytocoordinatethisunderpassprojectwithWright
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
2
County’sCSAH75projecttoprovideasafe,grade-separatedcrossingofthishighspeed
minorarterialrouteisanopportunitythatisunlikelytopresentitselfagain.
TheunderpasswillalsobelocatedwithincloseproximitytoMontissippiPark,thereby
enablingalargepercentageofMonticello’spopulationtoaccessMontissippiParkusing
theCity’spathwaysystemwithoutneedingtocrossCSAH75at-grade.Inthatregard,an
initialanalysisofpopulationandhomesservedbythisunderpassshowsthatthereare
approximately320+homeswithin½mileoftheproposedunderpassarea,withan
estimatedpopulationof800+persons.Thesenumbersareresidentialusesonly,anddo
notaccountforXcelEnergyemployeesandusersofMontissippiPark’sfacilities.
ShouldCouncilwanttheunderpasstobeimmediatelyuseable,staffwouldrecommend
constructingtheunderpass,theconnectingpathwaytoWestRiverStreet,andallponding
facilitiesasproposedintheplans.However,shouldCouncilonlywishtoconstructthe
underpassatthistime,staffwillrevisetheplanstominimizepondgradingtoprovide
onlyenoughpondingtoensurethatwaterdoesnotstandintheunderpassformorethana
shortperiodoftime.Thiswouldhelptoreducecoststoday,andthefullponding
improvementscouldthenbeconstructedwhendevelopmentoccurs.
ProjectFunding–
PerCouncildirection,staffhasmetwithXcelEnergyandWrightCountyrepresentatives
onnumerousoccasionstodiscusspotentialfundingcontributionsfromeitherorboth
agencies.
WrightCountyisnotwillingtocontributetothefundingoftheseimprovementsatany
amount.WrightCounty’sParkandTrailPlanshowsthattheyplantoconstructa
regionalpathwayonthenorthsideofCSAH75betweenMonticelloandClearwater,
howevernoschedulehasbeensetforthisprojectyet.Byconstructingthepedestrian
underpasswewouldbeprovidingforthefutureconnectionbetweenourlocalpathway
systemandtheCounty’sregionalpathwaysystem.Withthisinmind,staffapproached
theWrightCountyHighwayandParksDepartmentstoaskiftheywouldconsidersharing
inthecostsfortheunderpassandpathwayimprovements.Whilebothdepartments
supporttheprojectinconceptandprovidedajointletterofsupport,whichisattachedas
supportingdata,theyarenotabletosupportitfinanciallythroughtheirbudgets.
StaffthereforeaddressedtheWrightCountyBoardtorequestfundingparticipationin
theseimprovements.StaffpresentedourrequesttotheBoardontwoseparateoccasions
buttodatewehavenotbeensuccessfulinsecuringanyfundingfromtheCounty.
CouncilshouldbeawarethatstaffwillbeaddressingtheBoardagainnextTuesday
morningwhiletheyconsiderawardingacontractfortheirCSAH75Realignmentproject
inhopesofsecuringsomeleveloffundingbasedontheactualbidpriceswhichcamein
quiteabitlowerthantheestimatedcosts.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
3
XcelEnergyinformedstaffthattheyarewillingtocontribute$20,000totheconstruction
oftheunderpass.AttachedisXcel’sletterofsupportnotingthiscommitment.Thisisin
additiontothe$3,500theypreviouslyagreedtocontributetoplanpreparationcosts.
Xcelhasalsoagreedtoprovidepathwayeasementstoconstructtheproposedpathway
segmentsonvariouspiecesoftheirproperty.Theyhavealsoagreedtoprovidedrainage
easementsoverthree-plusacresoftheirlandtoaccommodatethestormwaterpondsthat
willserveadualpurpose.Onepurposeistokeeptheculvertdryduringsignificantrain
events.Thesecondpurposeistoprovidestormwaterpondfacilitiessupportinglong
termdevelopmentinthearea.
Underthecurrentproposal,Xcelwillprovidedrainageeasementsoverthree-plusacresof
landatnochargetotheCity.AsCouncilisaware,acquisitionofstormpondingareasis
sometimesdifficulttoobtainsohavingtheseeasementsinhandatthe“lowspot”is
advantageoustotheCity.Thecostofthisimprovement,sinceitservesasaregional
trunksewerfacility,canbefundedbytrunksewerfundsthatarecurrentlyavailable.
Thenasdevelopmentoccursinthisareainthefuturetheywillpayintothefundthatwas
usedtoconstructthispondinadvance.
PotentialCityfundingsourcesfortheseimprovementsincludeStateAidfunds,Street
ReconstructionFunds,LiquorFunds,TrunkStormFunds,futureParkDedicationFunds,
andgrants.
ThecurrentStateAidFundbalanceisover$1,200,000.Thetotalcostoftheunderpass
andpathwayimprovementsareeligibleforoff-systemStateAidfunding.However,this
wouldreducetheamountofStateAidfundsavailableforotherpotentialStateAid
projects,whichwillbediscussedinmoredetailonMondayevening.Insummary,the
CityhastheabilitytouseallofourStateAidfundsonotherplannedprojectsthatare
eligibleforStateAidfunding,butsomeoralloftheseprojectscouldalsobepaidfor
throughotherfundingsources.
ThecurrentStreetReconstructionFundbalanceis$2,800,000whichcouldbeusedtopay
forallorpartoftheseimprovements.
TheLiquorFundbalanceiscurrently$2,650,000initwhichcouldbeusedtopayforall
orpartoftheseimprovements.
TheStormWaterAccessFundhasacurrentbalanceof$1,775,000.Thecostsforthe
proposeddrainageimprovements,whichincludesalargerinfiltrationpond,threesmaller
ponds,andnumerouspipesandapronsconnectingtheland-lockedpondsisrightaround
$100,000.SeeFigure2(attached).Thereforethisfundcouldbeusedtopayforallor
partoftheseimprovements.
FutureParkDedicationFundscouldalsobeusedtofundaportionoftheproject,
howevermostofthesefundshavebeenspokenfortofundtheYMCAlandacquisition.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
4
AsCouncilmayrecall,theCityhasappliedforgrantsforthreeofthepathwaysegments
throughtheDNR.Thetotalestimatedcostforthesethreepathwaysegmentsis$110,000.
IfgrantfundsareawardedtotheCitytheywouldcover50%ofthecostofthese
improvements,whichwouldneedtobecompletedbyJune30,2013.TheCity’sshare
wouldthenbe$55,000.Itshouldbenotedthat$40,000wasbudgetedbytheParks
Departmentfor2011forpathwayconstructionpurposessothisamountcouldbeapplied
tothesepathwaysegments.
TheParksCommissionrecentlyrecommendedthattheCityCouncilapproveconstruction
oftheseimprovementssincetheyaligndirectlywiththegoalsoftheCity’sParksand
TrailsPlan.SeeattachedminutesfromMay17,2011.
A1.BudgetImpact:Asisnotedherein,thecostsfortheseimprovementswillbe
significantbutfundsarecurrentlyavailabletocoverallofthecosts.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:SeveralstafffromtheEngineeringandPublicWorks
Departmentswillbeimpactedtovariousextents.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-52acceptingbidsandawardingcontractfor
CSAH75PedestrianUnderpassandPathwayImprovements,CityProjectNo.
10C010.
2.MotiondenyingadoptionofResolutionNo.2011-52atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1totakeadvantageofthecost-effective
opportunitythathaspresenteditself.IftheCityisindeedcommittedtoprovidingasafe,
grade-separatedpedestriancrossingonthewestendofCSAH75,thiscouldlikelybethe
mostcost-effectiveopportunitywe’lleverhavetodoso.
Belowareseveralbulletsthatguidedstaff’srecommendations:
Onetime,costefficientopportunitytosolveashortandlongtermconflictbetween
highwaytrafficandpedestriantraffic.Thisconflictisonlygoingtoincreaseover
timeandthecosttosolveitinthefuturewillbemuchgreater.
Theunderpasseffectivelyresultsinmovingabeautifulriverpark,separatedbya
torrentofheavytrafficinto“theneighborhood”bycreatingaseamlesssafe
connection.
DirectandsafeaccesstoMontissippiParkforresidentswillhelpcounteractthe
negativeinfluenceontheneighborhoodcreatedbythepresenceoftheFreewayand
Power-lines.
Contributestowardaccomplishmentofagoalofthependingparkplanwhichisto
createasafebikeandpedestriansystemlinkingneighborhoodstonaturalareas.
EnablesspeedstobemaintainedonCSAH75at45MPHindefinitely.
CityCouncilAgenda:6/13/11
5
Althoughthepondingproposedisearlyrelativetoactualdevelopmentinthearea,
nonethelesspondingwillbeneededatthislocationeventuallywithourwithoutan
underpass.Fundsareinplacetocoverthiscost.
Cityfundsareavailableforthisprojectfromavarietyofsources.
Xcelhasshownsupportbyprovidinglandforpondingalongwithfundingofashare
oftheunderpass.Inaddition,Xcelhasexpressedawillingnesstofundmajor
portionsoftheconnectingtrailthatpassesthroughoralongsideXcelproperty.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2011-52
BidAbstract
LetterofSupport-XcelEnergy
LetterofSupport-WrightCountyHighwayEngineerandParksDirector
ParksCommissionMinutesfromMay17,2011
Figure1–WrightCountyCSAH75RealignmentPlan
Figure2–ProposedCSAH75UnderpassandPathwayImprovements-smallareamap
Figure3–ProposedCSAH75UnderpassandPathwayImprovements-largeareamap
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2011-52
ACCEPTINGBIDSANDAWARDINGCONTRACTFOR
CSAH75PEDESTRIANUNDERPASSANDPATHWAYIMPROVEMENTS
CITYPROJECTNO.10C010
WHEREAS,pursuanttoanadvertisementforbidsforthemakingofimprovementstoWright
CountyCSAH75includingpedestrianunderpassandpathwayimprovements,andother
necessaryappurtenantwork,bidswerereceived,opened,andtabulated,andthefollowingbids
werefoundtocomplywiththeadvertisementforbids:
CONTRACTORTOTALBASEBIDTOTALBASEBID
W/ALTERNATES
CentralSpecialties$1,819,164.40$224,080.77
FehnCompanies,Inc.$2,103,430.00$257,931.93
KnifeRiverCorporation$1,898,924.87$225,688.08
ParkConstructionCompany$2,567,476.55$332,339.13
R.L.LarsonExcavating,Inc.$1,741,575.66$250,200.50
Engineer’sEstimate$1,869,479.44$292,243.80
WHEREAS,thebidofR.L.LarsonExcavating,Inc.ofSaintCloud,MNintheamountof
$1,741,575.66forthetotalbasebidfortheconstructionofsaidWrightCountyimprovements,
andintheamountof$250,200.50forthetotalalternatebidfortheconstructionofsaidCity
Councilauthorizedimprovements,inaccordancewiththeapprovedplansandspecificationsand
advertisementforbids,isthelowestresponsiblebidderandshallbeandherebyisaccepted,and
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHE
CITYOFMONTICELLO:
1.TheMayorandCityAdministratorareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoenterintoa
contractwithsaidbidderfortheconstructionofsaidimprovementsforandonbehalfof
theCityofMonticello.
2.TheCityAdministratorisherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoreturnforthwithtoall
biddersthedepositsmadewiththeirbids,exceptthatthedepositofthesuccessfulbidder
andthenextlowestbiddershallberetaineduntilacontracthasbeenexecuted.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis13th dayofJune,2011.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
____________________________________
ATTEST:ClintHerbst,Mayor
_______________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
SPECIAL PARKS COMMISSION MINUTES May 17, 2011
Page 1 of 3
MINUTES
SPECIAL PARKS COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY
MAY 17, 2011 - 6:30 P.M.
“To enhance community pride through developing and maintaining City parks with a high standard of quality.”
Members Present: Larry Nolan, Nancy McCaffrey, Gene Emmanuel
Members Absent: Tim Stalpes, Brian Stumpf, Council Liaison
Others Present: Tom Pawelk, Park Superintendent
1. Call to Order.
Chair Larry Nolan called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and declared a quorum
present.
2. Discussion and approval of CSAH 75 underpass.
Larry Nolan indicated the handouts with drawings and the costs. Larry opened
the floor for discussion and questions. Gene Emmanuel asked about the reference
of “staff” and who the staff is. Tom Pawelk said the staff is the City Engineer,
Street Superintendent, Public Works Director, Angela Schumann and the Park
Superintendent. Nancy McCaffrey said that in reviewing the handouts she said
she thought the background information was very inclusive and very helpful.
Larry noted that the there’s no official crossing on CSAH 75 west near
Montissippi Park and that it’s crossed frequently by pedestrians and cyclists and
that it’s unsafe conditions by not having a crossing. Larry said it’s been an issue
for years and the only safe crossing is down at Pinewood Elementary which is
almost two miles away. Having a crossing under the highway would be a real
improvement in safety. Tom Pawelk said this would also open it up with future
connections with Wright County. Nancy agreed that it’s very beneficial and to
connect with the future pathway plans as well. Nancy said her biggest concern is
safety and she uses the pathway herself and crosses to use Montissippi Park and
it’s a big issue.
Gene inquired about the population of users being 800+ and that’s west of
Pinewood. Tom Pawelk said that on a daily basis he sees there being on average
40-60 users per day. Gene said that’s 800+ people in that section that have to
come all the way east to be able to cross over to the north side (75) pathway. So
they have to come all the way down to Pinewood to have a safe crossing.
SPECIAL PARKS COMMISSION MINUTES May 17, 2011
Page 2 of 3
Tom said to keep in mind that this is the time to take action on this while the
project in is process as the cost would double or triple to do a project like this
once CSAH 75 is in place.
Gene asked about funding. Tom said there’s money in the park budget for
East/West bridge lighting project and that equals $60,000, and that amount has
been allocated to use on this project as agreed with the City Council. Tom said
then next year they’ll budget for the lighting for East/West Bridge Park. Gene
said that with $380,000 total cost, utilizing that $60,000 that would bring it down
to $320,000. Gene said the biggest cost would be $270,000 for the underpass and
the drainage improvements which is a must. Tom said the water table is pretty
high there that’s why they have to put in the holding ponds. The pathway
segments would be the least expensive to complete. Gene said that at least to
make sure we get approval of the underpass and the drainage improvements. So
essentially $270,00 needed for that less the $60,000 from the park fund for a total
of $210,000 to put in the underpass and drainage improvements. Gene asked
about the projected grant and Tom said we do not know what that could be at this
time. Tom said there’s been talk about grants funding the project but it’s not
known at this time.
Tom said as long as we get the underpass and drainage in, everything else could
be done at a later date and the pathway segment 4 could be put in even five years
from now. However, Tom said that if we don’t have that spot utilized for Xcel
Energy employees he’s not sure how ambitious they would be in helping to fund
the project if we don’t do at least that segment to give them a safe crossing. Tom
said that at least the connection point should be made from West River to the
culvert and any other connection points could be done at a later date. Nancy
agrees that at minimum we should get the underpass and the drainage
improvements. She would like to personally see the underpass done at this time
and it makes more sense financially to do this at this time. Larry also noted that
Xcel has agreed to easements at this time but they may not do so in the future if
we hold off on the project.
NANCY MCCAFFREY MOVED TO PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO
THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE AT MINIMUM THE FUNDING FOR
THE BOX CULVERT UNDERPASS AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO
COINCIDE WITH THE CSAH 75 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND
THE FUTURE TRAIL CONNECTION PLANNING. GENE EMMANUAL
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SPECIAL PARKS COMMISSION MINUTES May 17, 2011
Page 3 of 3
6. Adjourn.
LARRY NOLAN MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 6:55 P.M.
NANCY MCCAFFREY SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
RECORDED BY: Beth Green
DATE APPROVED: ___________05/26/2011_______________
ATTEST: ____________________________________________