Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 04-09-2012
AGENDA REGULARMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL Monday,April9,2012–7p.m. MississippiRoom,MonticelloCommunityCenter Mayor:ClintHerbst CouncilMembers:LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta,BrianStumpf 1.CalltoOrderandPledgeofAllegiance 2A.ApprovalofMinutes–March26,2012SpecialMeeting 2B.ApprovalofMinutes–March26,2012RegularMeeting 3.Considerationofaddingitemstotheagenda 4.Citizencomments,publicserviceannouncements,andstaffupdates a.CitizenComments: b.PublicServiceAnnouncements: c.StaffUpdates: 5.ConsentAgenda: A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillsforApril9th B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments C.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#557amendingTitle6,Chapter3– Animals;FowlandadoptingSummaryOrdinance#557Aforpublication D.Considerationofauthorizingout-of-statetravelforFinanceDepartmentstaffto attendthe2012NationalGFOAConference E.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-034acceptingEasementAgreement withNorthernStatesPowerCompany/XcelEnergyfortherealignmentof120th StreetnorthofInterstate94 F.ConsiderationofratifyingtheFiberNetservicesratestructureforJune2012-May 2013asapprovedbytheFiberNetAdvisoryBoard SPECIALMEETINGS 5:30p.m.–EDAInterview 6:15pm–CLOSED(PropertyPurchaseNegotiation) Note:GirlScoutTourat6p.m.inCityHall G.ConsiderationofapprovingaConditionalUsePermitforanattachedMajor AccessoryStructureinanR-1(Single-Family)DistrictforLot7,Block1,River Forest (9747RiverForestDrive).Applicant:GregCurtis H.ConsiderationofapprovinganamendmenttoConditionalUsePermittoexpanda storagefacilityaccessoryinamobilehomeparkintheM-H(ManufacturedHome Park)zoningdistrict.Applicant:Kjellberg’sInc. I.Considerationofapprovingpurchaseoftelevisionsanddigitalsignsoftware, includingtheinstallationofequipmentandsoftware,withfundingfromCable Commissionfranchisefeereimbursements 6.Considerationofitemsremovedfromtheconsentagendafordiscussion 7.PublicHearing-ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#558amendingthe2012Fee ScheduleforanewAnimalControlpermitfee,andcontinuethePublicHearingtoApril 23,2012forfurtherconsiderationofBOD5andTSSrates 8.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#545approvingamendmentstoTitle10,Monticello ZoningOrdinance,Section3.7relatedtoOverlayordinancesregulatingtheMississippi Wild,Scenic&RecreationalRiverDistrictandtheShorelandDistrictandamendmentsto Section8-Definitions,andrepealingChapter27regulatingtheManagementofthe MississippiWild,Scenic,andRecreationalRiverSystemandtheShorelandAreasofthe CityofMonticello;alsoadoptingSummaryOrdinance#545Aforpublication 9.PublicHearing-ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-029acceptingFeasibility ReportandauthorizingPreparationofPlansandSpecificationsfor2012RuralRoad Improvements,CityProjectNo.12C001 10.ConsiderationofaddingPathwayReconstructionforthreeSegmentsto2012RuralRoad Improvements,CityProjectNo.12C001 11.Addeditems 12.Adjournment CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 5A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforApril9th (TK) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: Citystaffsubmitstheattachedbillregistersandpurchasingcardregistersforapprovalby Council.Thebillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedandthepurchasingcard registerscontainallcardpurchasesmadesincethelastCouncilmeeting.SubjecttoMN Statutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecksforpayment. ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunlessdirected otherwise.AcreditpurchasingagreementandpolicywasapprovedbyCouncilinitially andcardpurchasesmustcomplywiththepolicy. IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillandpurchasecardregisters,thesecan beapprovedwiththeconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfrom consentanddiscussedpriortomakingamotionforapproval. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethebillandpurchasecardregistersforatotalamountof $406,663.53. 2.MotiontoapprovetheregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Billregisters PurchaseCardregisters User: Printed:04/04/2012 - 10:59AM Ann.Zimmerman Computer Check Proof List by Vendor Accounts Payable Batch:00202.04.2012 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1002 A E MICHAELS DECORATING CENTER INC Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False Balance Flooring - balance for demo; prep; materials & install 9,546.00 04/10/2012 609-49754-440100 9,546.00Check Total: Vendor:2519 ALBERG WATER SERVICES INC Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 2508 Well #5 - well rehab, acid cleaning, screen rehab 7,460.00 04/10/2012 601-49440-440600 7,460.00Check Total: Vendor:2282 ALBIN ACQUISITION CORPORATION Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 0320125487S (1) background check 23.00 04/10/2012 226-45122-431990 23.00Check Total: Vendor:1747 ALEXANDRIA TECHNICAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 00066787 3/17-3/18/12 State Fire School - J.Roubinek 80.00 04/10/2012 101-42200-433200 80.00Check Total: Vendor:2087 ALL WAYS HEATING AND AC INC Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 3164 Installation of exhaust system for trkport & welding table area 10,315.00 04/10/2012 101-43127-440100 10,315.00Check Total: Vendor:1026 AMERICAN COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 1093309 ZQCSRZ - Ordinance 551 3/8 151.02 04/10/2012 101-41910-435100 1094582 SWPPP 3/1 91.56 04/10/2012 602-49480-435100 1094583 2012 Enterprise Funds 3/1 329.63 04/10/2012 101-41520-435100 1094584 Summary Budget Statement 3/1 468.80 04/10/2012 101-41520-435100 1094589 Grant Application 3/8; 3/8 125.85 04/10/2012 229-45202-435100 1095424 Ordinance 544 3/8 102.55 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 1095425 Ordinance 548 3/8 128.19 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 1095437 Ordinance 549A 3/8 113.54 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1095438 Ordinance 551 3/8 95.23 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 1095441 Ordinance 550 3/8 124.53 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 1096469 2012 Fee Schedule 3/15 69.59 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 1097454 Ordinance 544A 3/22 120.86 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 1097455 Ordinance 552 3/22 205.10 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 1097456 Ordinance 553 3/22 113.54 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 1097457 1000 Kjellbergs Park Ea 3/22; 3/29 151.02 04/10/2012 101-41910-435100 1097461 9747 River Forest Drive 3/22; 3/29 151.02 04/10/2012 101-41910-435100 1098500 Board of Appeal 3/29 102.55 04/10/2012 101-41310-435100 2,644.58Check Total: Vendor:1028 AMERIPRIDE LINEN AND APPERAL SERVICES Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 2200223863 17.54 04/10/2012 226-45122-441700 2200223863 60.65 04/10/2012 226-45122-431110 2200223863 12.10 04/10/2012 226-45122-441710 2200226430 17.45 04/10/2012 226-45122-441700 2200226430 41.45 04/10/2012 226-45122-431110 2200226430 10.10 04/10/2012 226-45122-441710 2200228959 16.10 04/10/2012 226-45122-441700 2200228959 46.92 04/10/2012 226-45122-431110 2200228959 11.04 04/10/2012 226-45122-441710 233.35Check Total: Vendor:1038 APPERTS FOOD SERVICE Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False 1707493 5.25 04/10/2012 226-45122-433300 1707493 re-sale 517.48 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 1711036 5.25 04/10/2012 226-45122-433300 1711036 74.45 04/10/2012 226-45127-421460 1711036 re-sale 426.39 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 1714561 5.25 04/10/2012 226-45122-433300 1714561 131.06 04/10/2012 226-45127-421460 1714561 re-sale 435.02 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 1,600.15Check Total: Vendor:1039 AQUA LOGIC INC Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 38711 UV pipe replacement labor & supplies 420.24 04/10/2012 226-45122-440800 420.24Check Total: Vendor:1040 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 629-7453501 4.41 04/10/2012 101-43110-441700 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 629-7453501 35.10 04/10/2012 101-45201-441700 629-7453501 15.70 04/10/2012 602-49490-441700 629-7453501 15.70 04/10/2012 601-49440-441700 629-7453501 49.16 04/10/2012 101-43120-441700 629-7453501 87.39 04/10/2012 101-43127-421990 629-7458404 4.23 04/10/2012 101-43110-441700 629-7458404 34.90 04/10/2012 101-45201-441700 629-7458404 15.52 04/10/2012 602-49490-441700 629-7458404 15.52 04/10/2012 601-49440-441700 629-7458404 48.98 04/10/2012 101-43120-441700 629-7458404 71.52 04/10/2012 101-43127-421990 629-7463406 4.11 04/10/2012 101-43110-441700 629-7463406 40.92 04/10/2012 101-45201-441700 629-7463406 15.40 04/10/2012 602-49490-441700 629-7463406 15.40 04/10/2012 601-49440-441700 629-7463406 48.86 04/10/2012 101-43120-441700 629-7463406 55.24 04/10/2012 101-43127-421990 578.06Check Total: Vendor:1041 ARCTIC GLACIER INC Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 402208111 re-sale 225.88 04/10/2012 609-49750-425500 225.88Check Total: Vendor:1048 AVENET LLC Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 30557 (2) hr - Graphic Design Changes 230.00 04/10/2012 101-41920-430920 230.00Check Total: Vendor:2868 JOHN AND MARY BARTHEL Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 70943 28.05 04/10/2012 655-00000-115040 28.05Check Total: Vendor:1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 769087 680 gallons (unleaded plus) 2,363.00 04/10/2012 101-43120-421200 769088 525 gallons (diesel B5) 1,950.38 04/10/2012 101-43120-421200 4,313.38Check Total: Vendor:1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 72630200 13.50 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 72630200 639.95 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 72741300 37.80 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 72741300 1,434.65 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 72741300 544.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 2,669.90Check Total: Vendor:2865 JOSEPH BENTLEY Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 67815 25.00 04/10/2012 655-00000-115040 25.00Check Total: Vendor:1066 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 1354901 (14) pizzas 70.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-421460 1354901 (34) pizzas 170.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 1354997 (18) pizzas 90.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-421460 1354997 (30) pizzas 150.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 1355050 (7) pizzas 35.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-421460 1355050 (41) pizzas 205.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-421460 720.00Check Total: Vendor:1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False 144678 re-sale 105.60 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 144679 436.15 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 144683 12.80 04/10/2012 226-45127-421460 144683 re-sale 271.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 147300 re-sale 139.60 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 147300 re-sale 65.60 04/10/2012 609-49750-425500 147301 849.60 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 147302 return - re-sale -8.19 04/10/2012 609-49750-425500 147304 re-sale 404.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 2,276.16Check Total: Vendor:2535 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 903751036 (5) - TL-WN722N (testing equipmt for wireless internet at apts) 124.24 04/10/2012 656-49877-421800 903782869 (2) ZYXE-ES202rPWR 24PT Layer 2 MGD Switch (see freight cr memo) 799.43 04/10/2012 656-49877-421800 903802895 Marking paint - (24) white; (24) orange 148.78 04/10/2012 656-49877-421990 903815630 Credit freight charge - refer to invoice 903782869 -29.93 04/10/2012 656-49877-421800 1,042.52Check Total: Vendor:1079 BOYER TRUCKS ROGERS Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False 405039 #105 - fan repair parts/labor 857.02 04/10/2012 101-43120-422110 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 857.02Check Total: Vendor:1080 BRAEMER MAILING SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: False 53922 UB delinquent notice fold; insert; seal; postal prep & del (1/2) 54.08 04/10/2012 601-49440-431990 53922 UB delinquent notice fold; insert; seal; postal prep & del (1/2) 54.08 04/10/2012 602-49490-431990 108.16Check Total: Vendor:2286 KERRY BURRI Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True 1/19-3/9/12 Mileage - agenda delivery 1/19; 2/9; 2/23; 3/8; 3/9 16.79 04/10/2012 101-41310-433100 3/23/12 Mileage reimbursement 3/20/12 thru 3/22/12 - MCFOA K. Burri 90.94 04/10/2012 101-41310-433100 3/29/12 3/29/12 Yoga class instructor 25.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-430120 132.73Check Total: Vendor:1089 SARA CAHILL Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: True 3/20/12 Mileage reimbursement CSI Software Training S. Cahill 54.80 04/10/2012 226-45122-433100 54.80Check Total: Vendor:1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 2348-000G115 General 1,677.50 04/10/2012 101-41610-430400 2348-000G115 11C006 - General - Wold contracts; Ebert 140.00 04/10/2012 226-45122-453010 2348-000G115 General 182.00 04/10/2012 655-49870-430400 2348-000G115 General - McDonalds; ect 280.00 04/10/2012 101-41910-430400 2348-000G115 General - EDA 140.00 04/10/2012 101-46500-430400 2348-103G56 Fiber/Broadband project 350.00 04/10/2012 655-49870-430400 2,769.50Check Total: Vendor:1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 3/21/12 5864452-7 347.32 04/10/2012 211-45501-438300 3/29/12 8000014331-5 44.00 04/10/2012 217-41990-438300 3/29/12 8000014331-5 61.96 04/10/2012 101-45201-438300 3/29/12 8000014331-5 458.85 04/10/2012 101-42200-438300 3/29/12 8000014331-5 1,809.92 04/10/2012 101-43127-438300 2,722.05Check Total: Vendor:1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 635622 utx - (1) rubber tilt valve 13.70 04/10/2012 226-45122-422990 13.70Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:2314 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORPORATION Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 367048-CRC-1 (1) 201 dz ind cleaner; (5) qrt flp top caps 247.58 04/10/2012 101-45201-421100 247.58Check Total: Vendor:1126 CUB FOODS - MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 3/24/12 re-sale produce 11.26 04/10/2012 609-49750-425500 11.26Check Total: Vendor:1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False 1018471 19,362.07 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 1018471 re-sale 84.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 1018488 3,630.20 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 1018519 14,055.75 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 1018519 re-sale 42.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 1018548 5,736.45 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 3163 226.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 3196 249.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 3305 46.60 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 3430 83.90 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 3437 216.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 43,731.97Check Total: Vendor:1134 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False 643013 1,553.55 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 643824 1,364.45 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 2,918.00Check Total: Vendor:1152 ECHOSTAR SATELLITE LLC Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 269710 3/12 (4/2/12 - 5/1/12) digital music 42.74 04/10/2012 609-49754-432500 42.74Check Total: Vendor:1167 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: False 122-539 re-sale 315.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 315.00Check Total: Vendor:1174 FINKEN WATER CENTERS Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False 00593TB Cust #5232 (2) 5 gal drinking water 17.85 04/10/2012 217-41990-443990 00593TB Cust #5232 (1) 5 oz cups 3.74 04/10/2012 217-41990-421990 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 00630TB Cust #401437 (6) 5 gal drinking water 41.70 04/10/2012 609-49754-443990 00630TB Cust #401437 (4) 5 oz cups 7.48 04/10/2012 609-49754-421990 00632TB Cust #5221 (11) 5 gal drinking water 65.45 04/10/2012 101-41940-443990 00633TB Cust #1064 (4) 5 gal drinking water 23.80 04/10/2012 226-45122-443990 00806TB Cust #405689 (1) 5 gal drinking water - 6th St 5.95 04/10/2012 655-49870-443990 1959742 Cust #405689 April 2012 cooler rental - School Blvd 5.34 04/10/2012 655-49870-441500 1959752 Cust #405689 April 2012 cooler rental - 6th St 5.34 04/10/2012 655-49870-441500 1959762 Cust #405689 April 2012 keurig rental - 6th St 5.34 04/10/2012 655-49870-441500 1962532 Cust #401437 April 2012 cooler rental 10.15 04/10/2012 609-49754-441500 1968382 Cust #5232 April 2012 cooler rental 9.62 04/10/2012 217-41990-441500 1968402 Cust #5221 April 2012 cooler rental 5.34 04/10/2012 101-41940-441500 1968412 Cust #1064 April 2012 cooler rental 10.15 04/10/2012 226-45122-441500 98741TB Cust #405689 (4) 5 gal drinking water - School Blvd 29.80 04/10/2012 655-49870-443990 98764TB Cust #405689 (2) 5 gal drinking water - 6th St 11.90 04/10/2012 655-49870-443990 258.95Check Total: Vendor:2862 STACY AND VERN FLOREK Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 65098 39.49 04/10/2012 655-00000-115040 39.49Check Total: Vendor:1740 BRAD FYLE Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: False 3/10/12 Mileage/meals - Detroit Lake - MN State Comm College Fire School 216.07 04/10/2012 101-42200-433100 3/12/12 Mileage - Buffalo H.S. - 3/12/12 Leadership training 14.04 04/10/2012 101-42200-433100 230.11Check Total: Vendor:1194 G AND K SERVICES Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False 1043137598 Floor mats 31.14 04/10/2012 217-41990-431900 1043139462 Floor mats 122.29 04/10/2012 609-49754-431900 1043142558 Floor mats 31.14 04/10/2012 217-41990-431900 184.57Check Total: Vendor:1201 RAYMOND J GLUNZ Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False 677594 4/2/12 A. Diersen 400.00 04/10/2012 651-49010-431150 400.00Check Total: Vendor:1591 GRADY'S ACE HARDWARE Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False 897249 Foodshelf - (1.5) ft vinyl; (2) clamp hoses 6.38 04/10/2012 101-41940-422300 8972501 Foodshelf - (1.5) ft vinyl; (1.5) ft V tube; (2) clamps 9.74 04/10/2012 101-41940-422300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 16.12Check Total: Vendor:1206 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False 137836 20.25 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 137836 1,492.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 1,512.25Check Total: Vendor:1641 H & L MESABI Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 85024 (1) 5/8x6108 FSE edge 145.97 04/10/2012 101-43125-422460 145.97Check Total: Vendor:1750 HBC HIAWATHA BROADBAND COMM INC Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: True 6252 (92) hrs 9,025.00 04/10/2012 655-49870-431990 6252 Reimb hotel; mileage 2/12 - 2/16/12 P. Scherbring 604.84 04/10/2012 655-49870-433100 6252 Reimb postage (97) late notices 43.65 04/10/2012 655-49870-432200 6252 Mgmt Fee-includes video content mgmt & tech support services 5,234.25 04/10/2012 655-49870-431990 6252 Neustar porting fees 23.65 04/10/2012 655-49870-431990 6252 (.75) hr - LNP porting requests processed 56.25 04/10/2012 655-49870-431990 6252 1723 SUBS @ $2/SUB for use of OSS System 3,446.00 04/10/2012 655-49870-431990 6252 1723 SUBS @ $2.5/SUB for billing services 4,307.50 04/10/2012 655-49870-431990 6252 Reimb mileage 2/16/12 FNM Mtg - M. DeAngel 52.80 04/10/2012 655-49870-433100 6252 utx - Reimb parking 2/16/12 FNM Mtg - M. DeAngel 13.00 04/10/2012 655-49870-433100 6252 Reimb mileage 2/21/12 FNM Mtg - J. Olson 83.60 04/10/2012 655-49870-433100 6252 Reimb SourceOne inv 2089 - Annual Notice 30.87 04/10/2012 655-49870-421990 22,921.41Check Total: Vendor:1868 MATTHEW HENNING Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: True 1/10-3/23/12 Mileage reimbursement 103.76 04/10/2012 655-49870-433100 103.76Check Total: Vendor:1244 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 12031222 Pool chemicals 1,363.59 04/10/2012 226-45122-421600 1,363.59Check Total: Vendor:1263 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 1256753 30.23 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 1256753 2,152.53 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 1256754 43.43 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1256754 1,144.75 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 1256754 re-sale 101.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 1259084 43.09 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 1259084 2,126.25 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 1259085 19.46 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 1259085 806.40 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 1261202 50.04 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 1261202 3,676.24 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 1261203 42.39 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 1261203 1,325.42 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 1261204 41.98 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 1264146 28.50 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 1264146 2,705.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 1264147 23.63 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 1264147 2,446.95 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 529914 -5.33 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 529915 -9.25 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 16,792.71Check Total: Vendor:1266 KALTEC OF MINNESOTA INC Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False 69568 April 2012 Host and Manage TLS Networking Phase I 479.87 04/10/2012 101-41920-430900 69569 April 2012 Monticello Air - Hosted Air Control Server 108.99 04/10/2012 655-49860-430930 588.86Check Total: Vendor:2866 KAREN KUHN Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 68461 30.36 04/10/2012 655-00000-115040 30.36Check Total: Vendor:2786 LANDFORM Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: False Escrow Refund ZMCDRD - net refund 12/13/11 deposit (ck lost-reissue) 111.03 04/10/2012 101-00000-220110 111.03Check Total: Vendor:1292 LEROY JOB TRUCKING INC Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 14619 (4) Animal charge 40.00 04/10/2012 101-42700-431990 40.00Check Total: Vendor:1296 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 48999 (2) wing bolts/purch; (2) NC castle nut 156.92 04/10/2012 101-43125-422450 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 156.92Check Total: Vendor:1303 M AMUNDSON LLP Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 128580 re-sale 319.09 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 128580 re-sale 812.60 04/10/2012 609-49750-425500 1,131.69Check Total: Vendor:2819 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: False 3/1/12 Labor Relations Services through 2/29/12 412.50 04/10/2012 101-41800-430400 412.50Check Total: Vendor:2044 MAINE CONDITIONING INC Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False 120101 Check 107295 lost - reissue - Dumont controller parts 575.00 04/10/2012 226-45122-422100 575.00Check Total: Vendor:1229 MAJIRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: True 771 (1.5) hr Creative fee - billboard 127.50 04/10/2012 609-49754-434990 127.50Check Total: Vendor:1229 MAJIRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: True 770 Drinking water UB insert 168.38 04/10/2012 601-49440-435200 168.38Check Total: Vendor:1318 JONATHAN CALEB MELLBERG Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: True 3/26/12 City Council meeting recording 3/26/12 80.00 04/10/2012 101-41110-431990 80.00Check Total: Vendor:2852 MIDWEST BUSINESS PROMOTIONS INC Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False 10054 26.99 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 10054 (400) pens 4/27/12 wine tasting event 189.03 04/10/2012 609-49754-425550 10054 (600) pens 283.08 04/10/2012 609-49754-421990 499.10Check Total: Vendor:1717 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False 39067 Safety Mgmt Program 2nd qtr 2012 1,933.00 04/10/2012 101-41800-431960 1,933.00Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1738 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False Qtr 1 2012 Community Water Supply Service Connection Fee 6,294.00 04/10/2012 601-49440-443750 6,294.00Check Total: Vendor:1366 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 0012499 Right of Way permit 25.00 04/10/2012 655-49870-443700 25.00Check Total: Vendor:1744 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 2012 Ballfields Ballfield change fund 400.00 04/10/2012 226-45122-103000 2012 Ballfields Ballfield POS drawer start-up 150.00 04/10/2012 226-45122-103000 550.00Check Total: Vendor:1369 MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False 4435a Golf Tournament 5/17/12 - Sponsorship includes 4 golfers 650.00 04/10/2012 655-49870-434600 4445a Chamber lunch - Exporting & Trade 3/20/12 - M.B.L. 12.00 04/10/2012 101-46500-433200 4446a Chamber lunch - Exporting & Trade 3/20/12 - J.O. 12.00 04/10/2012 101-41310-433200 674.00Check Total: Vendor:1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: True 5/31/12 Holiday Ceramics Class - (6) participants 30.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-421980 30.00Check Total: Vendor:1379 MONTICELLO UMPIRES ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: True 4/3/12 (38) games Early Bird Tournament 4/14-4/15/12 1,016.50 04/10/2012 226-45127-430160 4/3/12 (105) games Mon & Tue Men's League 4/16-5/15/12 2,808.75 04/10/2012 226-45127-430160 4/3/12 (17) games - credit from 2011 -454.75 04/10/2012 226-00000-362990 3,370.50Check Total: Vendor:1380 MONTICELLO VACUUM CENTER Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 61563 (1) oreck bag 21.32 04/10/2012 101-43127-421990 21.32Check Total: Vendor:1382 MOON MOTOR SALES INC Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False 4530074 (2) fixcut 5-2; (1) helmet system; (1) filler cap; ect. 122.52 04/10/2012 224-46102-421990 4549393 Blower - (1) chain lube w/moly 8.54 04/10/2012 101-43120-422100 4550146 (1) bar oil; (6) Stihl 2.6 HP premix; (44) Picco slim .043 49.95 04/10/2012 101-43120-421990 4550317 Net owed - retn/purchase (1) spur sprocket picco 4.33 04/10/2012 101-43127-421990 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 4553983 (10) #5 x 200' rope 5.34 04/10/2012 224-46102-421990 4555709 (1) fuel pump 18.97 04/10/2012 101-43120-422100 4556104 (1) fuel pump 17.05 04/10/2012 101-45201-422100 4556564 (1) fuel pump - refer to inv# 4555709 -18.97 04/10/2012 101-43120-422100 4556564 (1) fuel tank; (2) assorted filler cap 44.89 04/10/2012 224-46102-422100 4557145 (6) Stihl 5.2 oz premi 22.38 04/10/2012 224-46102-421300 4558243 (1) bar oil winter 18.16 04/10/2012 224-46102-421990 293.16Check Total: Vendor:2863 SARAH AND BEN MOSACK Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 65846 8.26 04/10/2012 655-00000-115040 8.26Check Total: Vendor:1629 MP NEXLEVEL LLC Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: True 94544 Cusomer premise - (140) ft direction bore; (298) ft pull cable 1,523.30 04/10/2012 656-49877-431990 1,523.30Check Total: Vendor:1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False 831152-00 #455 - (4) tires; (1) blade service pk; (1) lock; ect 1,056.81 04/10/2012 101-45201-422100 831152-01 #455 - (2) plate-wear 86.13 04/10/2012 101-45201-422100 1,142.94Check Total: Vendor:1393 NBP NORTHERN BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: False 428079-0 (1) ct spoons; (1) ct paper towels; (1) ct knives 120.84 04/10/2012 101-41940-421990 428079-0 (2) rm tan paper; (1) pk pink paper; (10) rm blue paper 75.49 04/10/2012 101-41940-420300 428079-0 (1) qrt marker cleaner 5.50 04/10/2012 101-41940-421100 428079-0 (1) bx cocoa; (2) bx ibuprofen 44.83 04/10/2012 101-41940-443990 428079-0 (2) bx envelopes; (2) dz blue pens; (2) dz red pens; ect 116.79 04/10/2012 101-41940-420990 429879-0 (1) pcl sharpener; (1) cork board; (1) sign holder 113.37 04/10/2012 226-45122-420990 429879-0 (2) ct copy paper 69.47 04/10/2012 226-45122-420300 431708-0 (1) dz blu pens 14.75 04/10/2012 101-41940-420990 431708-0 (3) rm recy paper 35.24 04/10/2012 101-41940-420300 431802-0 (3) pk blk pens; (1) pk bond roll paper 10.12 04/10/2012 217-41990-420990 433042-0 (1) pk blk pens; (1) planner; (3) frame displays; ect 61.98 04/10/2012 226-45122-420990 433592-0 (2) ct storage files 162.05 04/10/2012 101-41940-420990 433592-0 (1) rm fireworx paper 18.17 04/10/2012 101-41940-420300 434202-0 (1) bulletin board 23.23 04/10/2012 101-41940-420990 434202-0 (40) rm paper 138.94 04/10/2012 101-41940-420300 435627-0 (1) stapler; (1) dz blk pens; (1) dz blu pens; (1) dz red pens 74.06 04/10/2012 101-41940-420990 435627-0 (2) ct plates 182.63 04/10/2012 101-41940-421990 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 435627-0 (3) rm paper 14.72 04/10/2012 101-41940-420300 435627-1 (1) ct bowls 60.05 04/10/2012 101-41940-421990 436216-0 (10) clip boards; (1) dz legal pads; (3) rcpt bks; ect 98.85 04/10/2012 655-49870-420990 1,441.08Check Total: Vendor:1913 NEW FRANCE WINE Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 72480 28.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 72480 1,328.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 1,356.00Check Total: Vendor:2860 OAK REALTY TRUST ACCOUNT Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False Earnest Money 1539 East Broadway 10,000.00 04/10/2012 609-00000-165010 10,000.00Check Total: Vendor:2861 RANDY OBERG Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 64874 64.24 04/10/2012 655-00000-115040 64.24Check Total: Vendor:1405 OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False 662415 (1) dz each blue, red, blk pens; (1) stapler; ect 116.53 04/10/2012 101-43110-420990 662544 (1) pk batteries 18.16 04/10/2012 101-43110-420990 667901 (1) 4gb fast SD 20.51 04/10/2012 101-43110-420990 706873 (2) pk mesh wall letter; (1) dz pens; (1) dz pencils 54.68 04/10/2012 101-43110-420990 209.88Check Total: Vendor:1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False 44494 PW Bldg - Retrofit Lighting contract (partial reimb-Xcel rebate) 12,250.00 04/10/2012 101-43127-440100 44682 Free weight area fan - supplies & labor 81.28 04/10/2012 226-45122-440440 44697 labor/supplies replace ballast front counter & lamp in play area 185.94 04/10/2012 226-45122-440100 44720 PW Bldg - Retrofit Lighting contract - extra 500.00 04/10/2012 101-43127-440100 13,017.22Check Total: Vendor:2131 ONVOY VOICE SERVICES Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: True 120402010584 Voice - Wholesale Switching Services 1,437.29 04/10/2012 655-49860-430910 120402010584 Voice - Wholesale 800 Switched 317.66 04/10/2012 655-49860-430910 120402010584 Voice - Operator Services 186.31 04/10/2012 655-49860-430910 1,941.26Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:2131 ONVOY VOICE SERVICES Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: True 120402008669 Voice - Dips services 1,399.17 04/10/2012 655-49860-430910 1,399.17Check Total: Vendor:1419 PAN O GOLD CO ST CLOUD Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False 010004208321 re-sale 29.88 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 010004208914 re-sale 14.94 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 44.82Check Total: Vendor:1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 8343954-IN 15.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 8343954-IN 901.64 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 916.64Check Total: Vendor:1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False 2212817 29.19 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 2212817 2,053.51 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 2212818 52.92 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 2212818 2,123.32 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 2212818 re-sale 32.25 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 2214365 20.85 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 2214365 1,044.75 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 2215812 15.64 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 2215812 1,066.90 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 2215813 9.73 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 2215813 306.15 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 2215813 re-sale 32.25 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 6,787.46Check Total: Vendor:1432 PITNEY BOWES (PBCC)Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False 9718686 utx - 12/30/11 - 3/30/12 mailing system 122.28 04/10/2012 101-43110-441500 122.28Check Total: Vendor:1441 PROFESSIONAL TURF & RENOVATION Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 106467 (2) bags seed mix; (1) bag athletic pro II seed 303.53 04/10/2012 101-45201-422500 303.53Check Total: Vendor:1444 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 586999-00 -7.40 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 587662-00 24.92 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 587662-00 867.17 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 587662-00 224.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 589909-00 2.30 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 589909-00 96.06 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 589909-00 8.33 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 1,215.38Check Total: Vendor:1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 3/30/12 FNM Gasoline 390.12 04/10/2012 655-49870-421200 390.12Check Total: Vendor:2856 RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False 00111595 3/5/12-Vehicle Extrication in the 21st Century 18 students 3 hrs 425.00 04/10/2012 101-42200-433200 425.00Check Total: Vendor:1774 JASON ROUBINEK Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False 3/17/12 Mileage - Alexandria - Positive Pressure Attacks training 103.96 04/10/2012 101-42200-433100 103.96Check Total: Vendor:1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False A19553 (3) keys 28.86 04/10/2012 217-41990-421990 A19557 (1) refurbished door closer 37.41 04/10/2012 601-49440-422300 A19566 (4) assorted Medeco keyblank 38.48 04/10/2012 655-49870-421990 104.75Check Total: Vendor:1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: True 4/15/12 Contract 1,520.13 04/10/2012 101-42700-431200 1,520.13Check Total: Vendor:2864 STEVEN SCHALLOCK Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 65898 36.79 04/10/2012 655-00000-115040 36.79Check Total: Vendor:2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False W3386193 x/ref w/#W3400518 tk credit 119.70 04/10/2012 226-45122-431992 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 15 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 119.70Check Total: Vendor:1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False 690639 Firehall cleaning 3/10 - 3/24/12 100.00 04/10/2012 101-42200-431100 100.00Check Total: Vendor:1497 SPECTRUM SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False 218061 (2) cs can liners 68.80 04/10/2012 226-45122-421100 218061 (6) E.A.R. caps earplug; (1) bg E.A.R. caps repl cushion 39.92 04/10/2012 226-45122-422990 218061 (1) 3/1250 ml hadwash; (1) 3/1250 ml body wash; (20) compress 175.58 04/10/2012 226-45122-421990 218080 (1) cs powdered hand cleaner -70.83 04/10/2012 226-45122-421990 218082 (1) cs popcorn bags; (1) cs 16 oz cups; (1) cs 16 oz lids 247.27 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 218082 utx - (1) cs kleenex 49.81 04/10/2012 226-45122-421990 218276 (1) cs foam cups 20.20 04/10/2012 101-41940-421990 218277 re-sale 62.80 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 218277 (1) cs express napkins; (2) 3/1250ml handwash; ect 281.97 04/10/2012 226-45122-421990 218277 (12) trigger sprayers; (1) cs can liners; (1) 4/1gal lysol; ect 202.30 04/10/2012 226-45122-421100 218278 (1) cs 9" plates 30.98 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 218512 (6) window squeegees; (2) cs can liners; (2) cs wipes; ect 301.90 04/10/2012 226-45122-421100 218512 (2) 3/1250ml hair & body wash; (2) cs 9" tissue 167.41 04/10/2012 226-45122-421990 218513 (10) 100/bx dis gloves 69.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-425410 1,647.11Check Total: Vendor:1745 THE STANDARD Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False 00 147036 0001 April 2012 Life insurance premiums 2,144.81 04/10/2012 101-00000-217066 2,144.81Check Total: Vendor:1506 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: False 119654 (1) cs bale return x/ref w/#1842490 -47.45 04/10/2012 609-49750-443990 1865196 (1) cs coffee; (1) bale 57# bags; (4) bales 20# bags; ect 394.55 04/10/2012 609-49750-443990 1865196 re-sale (1) cs bloody mary mix; (1) cs grenadine 84.05 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 1871078 (2) bales 12# bags; (1) bale 20# bags 55.86 04/10/2012 609-49750-443990 1871078 re-sale - (1) cs sweet n sour; (1) cs cherry syrup 81.89 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 568.90Check Total: Vendor:2412 TEE JAY NORTH INC Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: False 17450 Sliding door - replaced safety beams & one beam control 634.84 04/10/2012 609-49754-440100 634.84Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 16 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:2475 TELECOM SPOT Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: False 40863 (10) Aastra 6757i (57i) IP Telephone; English Keypad 1,810.00 04/10/2012 655-49870-421820 41188 (4) Aastra 6757i (57i) IP Telephone; English Keypad 724.00 04/10/2012 655-49870-421820 2,534.00Check Total: Vendor:2867 JAMIE LUTZKE AND JESSICA THOMAS Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 69153 40.34 04/10/2012 655-00000-115040 40.34Check Total: Vendor:1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: False 679988 13,102.75 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 681263 re-sale 162.65 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 681272 13,487.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 681698 143.50 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 682324 13,340.25 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 682325 re-sale 91.70 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 682472 -259.05 04/10/2012 609-49750-425200 755436 re-sale 168.48 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 40,237.28Check Total: Vendor:2859 TRI-CO TREE MOVERS INC Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False 6074 Commuter parking lot - (11) trees transplanted 1,100.00 04/10/2012 101-43140-431990 1,100.00Check Total: Vendor:2429 VERIZON WIRELESS Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: False 2718325253 763-688-5387 3/21-4/20/12 26.02 04/10/2012 101-41920-432100 2718325253 763-688-5616; 763-688-5936 3/21-4/20/12 52.04 04/10/2012 101-43115-432100 2718325253 763-954-1070 3/21-4/20/12 26.02 04/10/2012 101-43120-432100 2718325253 763-954-1076 3/21-4/20/12 26.02 04/10/2012 101-43110-432100 2718325253 763-954-1070 on 3/20/12 PSMS-Data Transmission -11.11 04/10/2012 101-43120-432100 118.99Check Total: Vendor:1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: False 22487 re-sale 70.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 25222362 re-sale 158.40 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 25222487 re-sale 268.80 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 497.20Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 17 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: False 53920-IN 10.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 53920-IN 92.25 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 53920-IN 240.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 342.25Check Total: Vendor:1569 WEST SUBURBAN OFFICIALS ASSOC Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: False 51 (54) games 3/18/12-5/6/12 Men's Hockey 3,996.00 04/10/2012 226-45127-430160 3,996.00Check Total: Vendor:2728 WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: False 12040-2/10-3/9/12 Intrastate usage charges 41.75 04/10/2012 655-49860-430910 12069-19262 3/10-4/9/12 Intrastate usage charges 76.15 04/10/2012 655-49860-430910 117.90Check Total: Vendor:1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: False 294837-00 10.50 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 294837-00 360.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 295381-00 6.30 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 295381-00 408.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 784.80Check Total: Vendor:1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 105 ACH Enabled: False 402107 11.12 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 402107 414.50 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 402107 re-sale 62.00 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 487.62Check Total: Vendor:1209 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE & SPIRITS Check Sequence: 106 ACH Enabled: False 719914 46.40 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 719914 3,520.15 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 719914 re-sale 154.04 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 719915 10.15 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 719915 775.65 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 723075 31.90 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 723075 2,511.54 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 723076 13.05 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 723076 907.75 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 18 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 7,970.63Check Total: Vendor:2556 WOLD ARCHITECTS INC Check Sequence: 107 ACH Enabled: False 38953 11C006 - Natatorium Improvmts Ph 2 Contract 2,130.00 04/10/2012 226-45122-453010 38953 11C006 - Natatorium Improvmts Ph 2 - Reimbursables 80.27 04/10/2012 226-45122-453010 2,210.27Check Total: Vendor:1657 WORLD CLASS WINES INC Check Sequence: 108 ACH Enabled: False 1724066 18.33 04/10/2012 609-49750-433300 1724066 1,729.56 04/10/2012 609-49750-425100 1724066 144.99 04/10/2012 609-49750-425300 1724066 re-sale 40.12 04/10/2012 609-49750-425400 1,933.00Check Total: Vendor:1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 109 ACH Enabled: True Patrol-12-4 April 2012 94,763.50 04/10/2012 101-42100-430500 94,763.50Check Total: Vendor:1583 WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 110 ACH Enabled: False 3/19/12 (14) lights School Blvd 2/16-3/15/12 193.90 04/10/2012 101-43160-431900 3/19/12 (30) lights School Blvd 2/16-3/15/12 415.50 04/10/2012 101-43160-431900 3/19/12 Chelsea Rd E 2/16-3/15/12 180.00 04/10/2012 101-43160-431900 3/19/12 (9) lights 7th St & Highland 2/16-3/15/12 90.00 04/10/2012 101-43160-431900 3/19/12 Cedar St Dundas to Chelsea 2/16-3/15/12 124.65 04/10/2012 101-43160-431900 3/19/12 School Blvd Fenning/18/Edmonson 2/16-3/15/12 372.00 04/10/2012 101-43160-431900 3/28/12 HADCO lights @ East 7th St 357.75 04/10/2012 101-43160-431900 1,733.80Check Total: Vendor:1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 111 ACH Enabled: False 3/13/12 51-0371645-4 43.53 04/10/2012 101-45201-438100 3/19/12 51-0395766-0 232.64 04/10/2012 601-49440-438100 3/19/12 51-6505912-9 72.74 04/10/2012 101-42700-438100 3/19/12 51-9069641-8 1,937.89 04/10/2012 655-49870-438100 3/19/12 51-9348896-7 261.01 04/10/2012 101-41940-438100 3/20/12 51-6505913-0 539.62 04/10/2012 101-42200-438100 3/20/12 51-0238874-9 87.54 04/10/2012 101-43160-438100 3/20/12 51-0238890-9 95.75 04/10/2012 101-43160-438100 3/20/12 51-7780310-4 61.24 04/10/2012 101-41940-438100 3/20/12 51-9391437-3 301.16 04/10/2012 101-41941-438100 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 19 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 3/21/12 51-4271112-2 926.55 04/10/2012 211-45501-438100 3/21/12 51-6505910-7 1,544.84 04/10/2012 609-49754-438100 3/21/12 51-6505911-8 2,220.01 04/10/2012 101-41940-438100 3/21/12 51-6505911-8 9,641.15 04/10/2012 226-45122-438100 3/21/12 51-6505911-8 570.86 04/10/2012 101-45175-438100 3/21/12 51-6505911-8 253.71 04/10/2012 101-42800-438100 3/28/12 51-6505916-3 13,514.83 04/10/2012 101-43160-438100 3/28/12 51-6505907-2 129.30 04/10/2012 101-43140-438100 3/28/12 51-6505908-3 16.28 04/10/2012 101-42500-438100 3/29/12 51-6505905-0 6,018.70 04/10/2012 601-49440-438100 38,469.35Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 406,063.53 111 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/04/2012 - 10:59 AM)Page 20 User: Printed:03/26/2012 - 1:33PM Ann.Zimmerman Computer Check Proof List by Vendor Accounts Payable Batch:00205.03.2012 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1345 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False Proj No. 120383 11C006 - Swimming Pool plan review addit'l owed for 2nd spa pool 600.00 03/26/2012 226-45122-453010 600.00Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 600.00 1 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/26/2012 - 1:33 PM)Page 1 CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 5B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers. A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget) A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as needed,untilreplaced. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached list. 2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures. C.RECOMMENDATION: BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas listed. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Listofnew/terminatedemployees Name Title Department Hire Date Class Austin Felber Climbing Wall Attendant MCC 4/1/12 PT James Maanum Seasonal Parks Worker Parks 4/2 Seasonal Name Reason Department Last Day Class Amber Peters Voluntary FNM 3/22/12 PT Jon Hirschey Voluntary Streets 3/30/12 Seasonal Kelsey Johnson Voluntary MCC 8/1/11 PT NEW EMPLOYEES TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Book1: 4/3/2012 CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 5C.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#557amendingTitle6,Chapter3–Animals; FowlandadoptingSummaryOrdinance#557Aforpublication (CS/TK) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: StaffisrequestingCounciladoptionofOrdinance#557amendingTitle6,Chapter3with variousminorchangestothelanguage.CitystaffandAnimalControlOfficerPatty Salzwedelhavebeenreceivingoneormoreinquiriesamonthfromcityresidents interestedinkeepingfowl,suchaschickens,attheirresidence.Inordertorespond appropriatelytotheseinquiries,wehavereviewedtheordinanceregulating“Animals; Fowl”andrecommendadoptingtheproposedamendmentsasnotedinthesupporting data. AttachedisacopyofCityOrdinance6-3Animals;Fowl,withtheproposedchanges notedinred.Citystaffisrecommendingupdatingsomeofthewordingtobeconsistent withthecurrentpositionofAnimalControlOfficerratherthanAnimalWardenandto clarifythepermittingstepsandresponsiblepositions.Theexistingordinancespecifiesa permitfeeof$5,whichisnolongeradequatetocovercostsrelatedtoinquiries, processingofapermit,andrelatedinspectionsandoversightduringandafterapermitis issued.Itissuggestedthatthefeebeincreasedto$50andincorporatedintotheFee Schedule.AgendaItem#7addressesthischangeintotheFeeSchedule;afterthatthefee wouldbeadoptedannuallywiththeFeeSchedule. CityAttorneyJoelJamnikreviewedtheproposedchangesandrecommendedaddingthe section6-3-1(B)whichspecifiesthatanimalsnotallowedbythisordinancewouldbe prohibited.Hesuggestedthistoexcludethekeepingofwildandexoticanimalswithin thecitylimits. Inadditiontoreviewingtheordinanceforupdates,Citystaffcreatedapermitapplication forkeepingfowlonpremisesasspecifiedintheordinance.Theapplicationformsolicits informationidentifiedintheordinanceandwouldalsoserveasasignedpermitwhen approved.Acopyofthedraftformisincludedwiththesupportingdata. CityOrdinance6-3addressesavarietyofanimalcontrolregulationsincludingchickens andfowl.AccordingtotheLeagueofMNCities,therearenostatelawsthataddressthe keepingofchickensincities,soitisuptotheCitytochoosetoallowchickensor prohibitchickens.Staffwouldrecommendleavingtheregulationspertainingtochickens intheordinanceatthistime. A1.BudgetImpact:Arecommendedfeeincreaseistocovercostsassociatedwith issuanceofpermits,inspections,andrelatedinquiries.Adoptionofthesummary ordinanceissuggestedtominimizethecostforpublicationofordinancechanges. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:StaffhasbeenworkingwiththeAnimalControlOfficer toreviewtheordinancethatregulateschickensandfowlwithinthecity.Havinga permitapplicationinplaceshouldmaketheprocessmoreefficientforresidents CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 2 thatwanttopursuekeepingchickensontheirproperty.Thepermitprocesswould behandledbytheAnimalControlOfficerandtheCityClerk’soffice.The AnimalControlOfficerwillcontinuetohandlequestionsandinspectionsrelated tothepermittingprocessandkeepingofanimalsasindicatedintheordinance. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#557amendingTitle6,Chapter3–Animals;Fowlas proposedandadoptSummaryOrdinance#557Aforpublication. Note:Summaryordinancerequires4/5th voteforapproval. 2.MotiondenyingadoptionofOrdinance#557atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffsupportsAlternative#1.TheCityadopteditscurrentordinanceregulating animalsandfowlin1989,andtheregulationsappeartoworkfairlywellwithfewreports ofproblems.Citystaffrecommendsapprovingtheminorproposedchangesatthistime. IfCouncilwishestoaddressmajorchangestothisordinance,itwouldberecommended toworkwiththeCityAttorneyondraftinganewordinanceatsometimeinthefuture. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: OrdinanceNo.557 SummaryOrdinanceNo.557A CityOrdinanceTitle6,Chapter3withproposedchanges Excerpton“Chickens”fromLMCHandout“AnimalRegulationinCities” Copyofform:Application/PermittoKeepFowlonPremises ORDINANCENO.557 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE6,CHAPTER3OFTHEMONTICELLO CITYCODERELATINGTOANIMALS;FOWL ITISHEREBYORDAINEDBYTHEMONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL: Section1.TheSECTION listingofTitle8,Chapter2oftheMonticelloCityCodeshallbe amendedtoreadasfollows: 6-3-3:Animals,Fowlwithincitylimits;Permits Section2.ThefollowingprovisionsofTitle8,Chapter2oftheMonticelloCityCodeshall beamendedtoreadasfollows: 6-3-1:ANIMALSKEPTWITHINCITYLIMITS: (A)Nohorse,mule,donkey,pony,cow,goat,sheep,oranimalraisedforfur bearingpurposesshallbekeptwithinthecitylimits,exceptinanoutlying districtwheretherearenotmorethanthree(3)residences,otherthanthat occupiedbytheowneroroccupantofthepremisesuponwhichsaid animalsarekept,withinadistanceoffivehundredfeet(500')ofthe structurehousingorenclosingsaidanimal,unlessaspecialwrittenpermit thereforeisissuedbytheAnimal Warden ControlOfficerandtheCity Clerk afteraninspectionofthepremisesandafindingoffacttotheeffect thatnonuisanceshallbecreatedthereby.[balanceofsectionremainsthe same] (B)Allanimals,otherthanthosespecificallyallowedandpermittedbythis ordinance,shallbeprohibitedwithinthecitylimits. 6-3-2:STABLES: (C)TheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer shall,ifhedeemssuchmeasures necessaryinordertoavoidanuisance,requirethatanysuchbuildingbe screenedtightlyagainstfliesand/orthatitbeprovidedwithrunningwater, drainsewerconnection,flooringimpervioustowater,andthatsuchother measuresbetakenasmaybenecessarytoinsureproperprotectionto publichealthandsafetyasconditionsprecedenttotheissuanceofany suchspecialpermit. 6-3-3:ANIMALS,FOWLWITHINCITYLIMITS,PERMITS: (A)Nopersonshallanywhereinthecitykeep,harbor,ormaintaincare, custody,orcontroloveranysmallanimalsuchasarabbitoranyfowl ORDINANCENO.557 suchasachicken,turkey,orduck,oranypigeon,withoutobtaininga permitthereforeissuedbytheAnimal Warden ControlOfficerandthe CityClerk. (B)TheAnimal Warden ControlOfficerandtheCityClerk maygrantany permitpursuanttothissectionaftertheapplicanthassoughtthewritten consentofatleasteightypercent(80%)oftheoccupantsoftheseveral descriptionsoftherealestatesituatedwithin100feetoftheapplicant's realestate.Suchwrittenconsentshallberequiredonthefirstandinitial applicationandasoftenthereafterastheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer deemsnecessary. 6-3-4:APPLICATIONFORPERMIT:Anypersondesiringapermitunderthischapter shallmakewrittenapplicationthereforetothe AnimalWarden CityClerk upona formpreparedbythe AnimalWarden CityClerk,whichapplicationshall describetherealestateuponwhichitisdesiredtokeepsaidanimalsandshall requirethegivingofsuchinformationbytheapplicantasthe AnimalWarden maydesire Citymayrequest.Suchapplicationshallcontainastatementbythe applicantthathewillatalltimeskeepsuchanimalsinaccordancewithall conditionsprescribedbytheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer,andfailuretoobey suchconditionsshallbeaviolationofthischapterandshallbecausefor cancellationofthepermitbytheAnimal Warden ControlOfficerandtheCity Clerk. 6-3-5:DURATIONOFPERMIT;FEE: (A)Eachpermitissuedhereundershallexpire oneyearonMarch31next aftertheissuanceunless sooner revoked priortotheexpirationdate. (B)Theannualfeeforapermitshallbe asstatedintheFeeScheduleFive Dollars($5.00),whichshallbepaidatthetime ofthemakingof the application therefore issubmitted. 6-3-6:CONDITIONSFORKEEPINGANIMALSORFOWL;REVOCATION:The Animal Warden ControlOfficer mayprescribegeneralconditionsforthekeeping ofanimalsorfowlandspecificconditionsastoaparticularanimalorfowlor particularpremisesasinhisorherjudgmentisnecessarytosafeguardpublic healthandthegeneralwelfare.TheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer mayrevoke anypermitgrantedpursuanttothischapterifanysuchconditionisviolatedorif anypetbecomesapublicnuisance. 6-3-7:REFUSALTOGRANTPERMIT:TheAnimal Warden ControlOfficerand CityClerk mayrefuseapermittokeepormaintainanimalsorfowlhereunderfor failuretocomplywiththeprovisionsofthischapterandshallrefuseapermitifin hisjudgmentsuchanimalsorfowlshouldnotbekeptuponthepremises describedintheapplicationforpermit.Ifanysuchpermitberefused,thefeepaid ORDINANCENO.557 withtheapplicationshallberetainedbytheCitytopayitsexpensesinthe investigationandconsiderationthereof. 6-3-8:PENS;YARDS:Allstructures,pens,coops,oryardswhereinanimalsorfowlare keptorpermittedtobeshallbemaintainedinacleanandsanitarycondition, devoidofallrodentsandvermin,andfreefromobjectionableodors.Theinterior walls,ceilings,floors,partitions,appurtenancesofallsuchstructuresshallbe whitewashedorpaintedastheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer shalldirect.The Animal Warden ControlOfficer,uponthecomplaintofanyindividual,shall inspectanysuchstructureorpremisesandissueanysuchorderasmaybe necessarytocarryouttheprovisionshereof. 6-3-9:ANIMALS,FOWLATLARGE:Nopersonshall sufferor permitanyhorses, mules,donkeys,ponies,cattle,sheep,goats,swine,rabbits,chickens,geese, ducks,orturkeysofwhichheistheowner,caretaker,orcustodiantobeatlarge withinthecity.Anysuchcreatureshallbedeemedtobeatlargewhenitshallbe offthepremisesownedorrentedbyitsownerandunaccompaniedbytheowner oranagentoremployeeoftheowner. 6-3-10:MANURE:Nomanureshallbedumpedorleftonanystreet,alley,sidewalk,or onanyopenareaorlotinanyinhabitedportionofthecity.Neithershallany manure Manureshallnot beusedtogradeinwholeorinpartanysidewalk, street,openarea,orlotinsaidsectionunlesssaidmanureiscompletelycovered withatleastfourinches(4")ofdirt. Section2.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassage andpublication.TheordinanceinitsentiretyshallbepostedontheCitywebsite afterpublication.CopiesofthecompleteOrdinanceareavailableonlineandat MonticelloCityHallforexaminationuponrequest. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis9th dayofApril,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO _______________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: SUMMARYORDINANCENO.557A CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ASUMMARYORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE6,CHAPTER3OFTHE MONTICELLOCITYCODERELATINGTOANIMALS;FOWL NOTICEISHEREBYGIVEN that,onApril9,2012,OrdinanceNo.557wasadopted bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota.Duetothelengthynatureof OrdinanceNo.557,thefollowingSummaryOrdinanceNo.557Ahasbeenpreparedfor publicationasauthorizedbystatelaw. TheordinanceadoptedbytheCouncilamendstheAnimals;Fowlordinance,Title6, Chapter3oftheMonticelloCityCode.Thegeneralpurposeoftheordinanceamendmentisto updaterulesandregulationsrelatedtokeepinganimalsandfowlintheCityofMonticello,with changesinthefollowingsections: 6-3-1:AnimalsKeptWithinCityLimits 6-3-2:Stables 6-3-3:FowlwithinCityLimits,Permits 6-3-4:ApplicationforPermit 6-3-5:DurationofPermit;Fee 6-3-6:ConditionsforKeepingAnimalsorFowl;Revocation 6-3-7:RefusaltoGrantPermit 6-3-8:Pens;Yards 6-3-9:Animals,FowlAtLarge 6-3-10:Manure Aprintedcopyofthewholeordinanceisavailableforinspectionbyanypersonduring theCity’sregularofficehours.ThecompleteordinancewillbepostedontheCity’swebsite followingpublication. APPROVEDFORPUBLICATION bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello, Minnesota,this9th dayofApril,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: JeffO’NeillCityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: MONTICELLOCITYCODETITLE6/Chapter3/Page1 CHAPTER3 ANIMALS;FOWL SECTION: 6-3-1:Animalskeptwithincitylimits 6-3-2:Stables 6-3-3:Animals,Fowlwithincitylimits;Permits 6-3-4:Applicationforpermit 6-3-5:Durationofpermit;Fee 6-3-6:Conditionsforkeepinganimals;revocation 6-3-7:Refusaltograntpermit 6-3-8:Pens;yards 6-3-9:Animals,fowlatlarge 6-3-10:Manure 6-3-1:ANIMALSKEPTWITHINCITYLIMITS: (A)Nohorse,mule,donkey,pony,cow,goat,sheep,oranimalraisedforfur bearingpurposesshallbekeptwithinthecitylimits,exceptinanoutlying districtwheretherearenotmorethanthree(3)residences,otherthanthat occupiedbytheowneroroccupantofthepremisesuponwhichsaidanimals arekept,withinadistanceoffivehundredfeet(500')ofthestructure housingorenclosingsaidanimal,unlessaspecialwrittenpermittherefore isissuedbytheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer andtheCityClerk afteran inspectionofthepremisesandafindingoffacttotheeffectthatnonuisance shallbecreatedthereby.Suchspecialpermitshallbeissuedforthe keepingofanysuchanimalsonanylotonlyinthefollowingtwocases: (1)Wheresuchanimalswerebeinglawfullykeptonsuchlotpriorto enactmenthereof;(2)Wheresuchanimalswerebeinglawfullykeptonsuch lotaftertheenactmenthereofinanareainwhichtherewerenotthree residenceswithinadistanceoffivehundredfeet(500')ofthestructure enclosingsuchanimals,andsubsequentlyotherresidenceswerebuilt bringingthestructurehousingtheanimalswithinarestricteddistrict.Such permitshallbeforthetermofoneyearandshallnotberenewedwithouta re-inspection. (B)Allanimals,otherthanthosespecificallyallowedandpermittedbythis ordinance,shallbeprohibitedwithinthecitylimits. 6-3-2:STABLES: (A)EverystableorotherbuildingwhereinanyanimallistedinSection6-3-1is keptshallbeconstructedofsuchmaterialandinsuchmannerthatitcanbe keptcleanandsanitaryatalltimes. (B)Everysuchstableorotherbuildingoccupiedbyauthorityofaspecial permitshall,iflocatedwithintwohundredfeet(200')ofanytenementor MONTICELLOCITYCODETITLE6/Chapter3/Page2 apartmenthouse,hotel,restaurant,boardinghouse,retailfoodstore, buildingusedforschool,religiousorhospitalpurposes,orresidenceother thanthatoccupiedbytheowneroroccupantofthepremisesuponwhich saidcreaturesarekept,beprovidedwithawatertightandflytight receptacleformanureofsuchdimensionastocontainallaccumulationsof manure,whichreceptacleshallbeemptiedsufficientlyoftenandinsuch mannerastopreventitsbecominganuisance.Saidreceptacleshallbe keptsecurelycoveredatalltimesexceptwhenopenduringthedepositor removalofmanureorrefuse.Nomanureshallbeallowedtoaccumulate exceptinsuchreceptacle. (C)TheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer shall,ifhedeemssuchmeasures necessaryinordertoavoidanuisance,requirethatanysuchbuildingbe screenedtightlyagainstfliesand/orthatitbeprovidedwithrunningwater, drainsewerconnection,flooringimpervioustowater,andthatsuchother measuresbetakenasmaybenecessarytoinsureproperprotectiontopublic healthandsafetyasconditionsprecedenttotheissuanceofanysuchspecial permit. 6-3-3:ANIMALS,FOWLWITHINCITYLIMITS;PERMITS: (A)Nopersonshallanywhereinthecitykeep,harbor,ormaintaincare, custody,orcontroloveranysmallanimalsuchasarabbitoranyfowlsuch asachicken,turkey,orduck,oranypigeon,withoutobtainingapermit thereforeissuedbytheAnimal Warden ControlOfficerandtheCityClerk. (B)TheAnimal Warden ControlOfficerandtheCityClerk maygrantany permitpursuanttothissectionaftertheapplicanthassoughtthewritten consentofatleasteightypercent(80%)oftheoccupantsoftheseveral descriptionsoftherealestatesituatedwithin100feetoftheapplicant'sreal estate.Suchwrittenconsentshallberequiredonthefirstandinitial applicationandasoftenthereafterastheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer deemsnecessary. (C)Nopermitshallbegrantedtokeepanyanimal,fowl,orpigeonwithina dwellingunitorpartthereof,noronanyrealestatewhichcontainsthreeor moredwellingunits. (D)Thissectionshallnotapplytodogsorcatsortoveterinariansorlicensedpet shopsorlicensedkennels. 6-3-4:APPLICATIONFORPERMIT:Anypersondesiringapermitunderthischapter shallmakewrittenapplicationthereforetothe AnimalWarden CityClerk upona formpreparedbythe AnimalWarden CityClerk,whichapplicationshalldescribe therealestateuponwhichitisdesiredtokeepsaidanimalsandshallrequirethe givingofsuchinformationbytheapplicantasthe AnimalWardenmaydesire City MONTICELLOCITYCODETITLE6/Chapter3/Page3 mayrequest.Suchapplicationshallcontainastatementbytheapplicantthathe willatalltimeskeepsuchanimalsinaccordancewithallconditionsprescribedby theAnimal Warden ControlOfficer,andfailuretoobeysuchconditionsshallbea violationofthischapterandshallbecauseforcancellationofthepermitbythe Animal Warden ControlOfficerandtheCityClerk. 6-3-5:DURATIONOFPERMIT;FEE: (A)Eachpermitissuedhereundershallexpire oneyearonMarch31next after theissuanceunless sooner revoked priortotheexpirationdate. (B)Theannualfeeforapermitshallbe asstatedintheFeeSchedule Five Dollars($5.00),whichshallbepaidatthetime ofthemakingof the application therefore issubmitted. 6-3-6:CONDITIONSFORKEEPINGANIMALSORFOWL;REVOCATION:The Animal Warden ControlOfficer mayprescribegeneralconditionsforthekeeping ofanimalsorfowlandspecificconditionsastoaparticularanimalorfowlor particularpremisesasinhisorherjudgmentisnecessarytosafeguardpublichealth andthegeneralwelfare.TheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer mayrevokeany permitgrantedpursuanttothischapterifanysuchconditionisviolatedorifanypet becomesapublicnuisance. 6-3-7:REFUSALTOGRANTPERMIT:TheAnimal Warden ControlOfficerandCity Clerk mayrefuseapermittokeepormaintainanimalsorfowlhereunderforfailure tocomplywiththeprovisionsofthischapterandshallrefuseapermitifinhis judgmentsuchanimalsorfowlshouldnotbekeptuponthepremisesdescribedin theapplicationforpermit.Ifanysuchpermitberefused,thefeepaidwiththe applicationshallberetainedbytheCitytopayitsexpensesintheinvestigationand considerationthereof. 6-3-8:PENS;YARDS:Allstructures,pens,coops,oryardswhereinanimalsorfowlare keptorpermittedtobeshallbemaintainedinacleanandsanitarycondition,devoid ofallrodentsandvermin,andfreefromobjectionableodors.Theinteriorwalls, ceilings,floors,partitions,appurtenancesofallsuchstructuresshallbe whitewashedorpaintedastheAnimal Warden ControlOfficer shalldirect.The Animal Warden ControlOfficer,uponthecomplaintofanyindividual,shall inspectanysuchstructureorpremisesandissueanysuchorderasmaybe necessarytocarryouttheprovisionshereof. 6-3-9:ANIMALS,FOWLATLARGE:Nopersonshall sufferor permitanyhorses, mules,donkeys,ponies,cattle,sheep,goats,swine,rabbits,chickens,geese,ducks, orturkeysofwhichheistheowner,caretaker,orcustodiantobeatlargewithinthe city.Anysuchcreatureshallbedeemedtobeatlargewhenitshallbeoffthe premisesownedorrentedbyitsownerandunaccompaniedbytheowneroran agentoremployeeoftheowner. MONTICELLOCITYCODETITLE6/Chapter3/Page4 6-3-10:MANURE:Nomanureshallbedumpedorleftonanystreet,alley,sidewalk,or onanyopenareaorlotinanyinhabitedportionofthecity.Neither shallany manure Manureshallnot beusedtogradeinwholeorinpartanysidewalk,street, openarea,orlotinsaidsectionunlesssaidmanureiscompletelycoveredwithat leastfourinches(4")ofdirt. (#170,3/13/89) Application/PermittoKeepFowlonPremises |1 APPLICATION/PERMITTOKEEPFOWLONPREMISES INSTRUCTIONS:Pleasetypeorprintlegiblyallrequestedinformation.Incompleteapplicationsor applicationsthatdonotcomplywithcityordinanceswillnotbeaccepted.Completedapplicationsmustbe senttoMonticelloCityHallandatleast30daysallowedforprocessingandapproval.Youwillbenotified ofthestatusofyourapplicationbyemailormail.Approvedpermitswillbemailedtotheaddressindicated bytheApplicant. Dateofapplication:_______________________Checkone:Original Renewal APPLICANTINFORMATION: ApplicantName(s):_________________________________________________________________________ MailingAddress:_____________________________________________________________________________ StreetAddress(ifdifferentthanabove):___________________________________________________________ PhoneNumber:___________________________CellPhoneNumber:________________________ Email:__________________________________________________________________________________ PREMISESINFORMATION: PremisesAddress:________________________________________________________________________ PropertyIdentificationNumber(PID)ofpremises:_______________________________________________ Describeindetailandattachdrawing ofbuilding,cage,etc.wherefowlwillbekeptandattachasitesurvey showinglocationonthepremises: Listinformationandnumberoffowltobekeptonpremises: TYPEOFFOWL BREED NUMBEREACH Male Female Chickens Ducks Geese Turkeys Pigeons Other(list) CityHall 505WalnutStSte1 Monticello,MN55362 (763)295-2711 MonticelloAnimalControl Monticello,MN55362 (612)859-6989 Animal.control@ci.monticello.mn.us Application/PermittoKeepFowlonPremises |2 CONSENTFORM PremisesAddress:_________________________________________________________ Thefollowingresident/businesspropertiesarelocatedwithin100feetofthepremiseswherethe Applicantintendstokeepfowl.Atleast80%ofthepropertyownersmustindicatetheirapprovaland signthisconsentform.Completedconsentformmustaccompanytheapplication. MustlistALLpropertieswithin100feetofthepremises:Iherebygivemyconsentforfowltobekeptonthepremises asidentifiedinthisapplication. PropertyAddressPIDAuthorizedName(print)Signature ApplicantVerification: Iattestthattheinformationinthisapplicationistrueandcorrect.Iagreetoabidebyallrules,regulations andprovisionsoftheCityCodeofOrdinances,andallotherapplicablerules,regulationsandprovisionsof lawbyStateand/orFederalauthority.Iunderstandthatapermitmayberevokeduponviolationofanyofthe stipulationsbyMonticelloAnimalControlstatedinthispermitorwithintheCityordinances. ApplicantSignature:______________________________________________ Application/PermittoKeepFowlonPremises |3 VERIFICATIONBYMONTICELLOANIMALCONTROL: Pleaselistdateofinspectionandnotepass/failandanycomments: INSPECTIONTYPEDATEPASS/FAILCOMMENTS Applicationiscomplete Verificationofsignatures Sitecomplieswithzoningdistrict Sitecomplieswithordinance Structureforfowlmeetsrequirements Fowlwillnotrunatlarge Propermanurecontrol/disposal Other: Pleaselistanyotherconcernsorissuesforthislocationtobeallowedtokeepfowlonthepremises: AnimalControlOfficerRecommendation (checkone): Thisapplication/renewalshould NOT beapproved. Thisapplication/renewalshouldbe APPROVED.Listanystipulationsandconditionsforthispermit: OfficerSignature:________________________________________Date:_________________ VERIFICATIONBYCITYOFMONTICELLO: AnnualPermitfee($50)---DatePaid:______________Receipt#:______________ Signature:_____________________________________________Date:_____________________ Title:_________________________________________ Checkone: Thisapplication/renewalis NOTAPPROVED bytheCityofMonticello. Thisapplication/renewalis APPROVED bytheCityofMonticello.Thispermitiseffectiveforoneyear: FROM_________________________TO_________________________ (Note:Ifapproved,thisPermitmustbekeptonpremises) CityCouncilAgenda:4/9/12 1 5D.Considerationofauthorizingout-of-statetravelforFinanceDepartmentStaffto attendthe2012NationalGFOAConference (TK) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheGovernmentFinanceOfficersAssociation(GFOA)annuallyholdsanational conference.The2012conferenceisJune10th throughthe13th inChicago,IL. Theconferencehasover70concurrentsessionsandtwogeneralsessionsfromSunday afternoonthroughWednesdaymorning.Sessionscovertopicsintheareasof Accounting,Auditing,andFinancialReporting,BudgetingandFinancialPlanning, CapitalPlanningandEconomicDevelopment(Management),DebtManagement, TreasuryManagementandInvesting,PensionandBenefitAdministrationand TechnologyandDigitalGovernment(seeattachmentforcurrentsessionlist). Inadditiontotheconference,onSaturday,June9th thesevenGFOAstandingcommittees willholdtheirsemi-annualcommitteemeetings.Iamcurrentlyservingasamemberof GFOA’sstandingcommitteeonEconomicDevelopmentandCapitalPlanning.Iplanon attendingthecommitteemeetingandannualconference.Ihavealreadypaidforthe conferenceregistration($380)myself.IamrequestingthattheCityreimbursemeforthe conferenceregistrationandpayformytraveltoandfromChicagoandnotrequiretheuse ofvacationonFriday(travel)andMondaythroughWednesday(conference)toattend andthatitbeconsideredhoursworked.ThispastJanuary,Ididpayfortheexpenses (airfare,mealsandhotel)andused2andhalfdaysofvacationtoattendthewinter committeemeetinginWashingtonD.C. IwouldalsorequestthattheCityallowAssistantFinanceDirectorAngieMcIntireto attendtheannualconferenceandpayforherregistration,travel,hotel,andnotrequirethe useofvacationMondaythroughWednesdaytoattendtheconference.Currentlyairfare isaround$137.50whiledrivingwouldcostaround$110plusparkingexpenses,soflying anddrivingwouldcostaboutthesame.Conferencehotelscostbetween$171to$199per nightorabout$800for4nights.ThetotalcosttosendtheFinanceDirectorand AssistantFinanceDirectorwouldbearound$2,000. Lastyear,theCitydidpayformetoattendthenationalconferenceinSanAntonio,TX. PriortocomingtotheCityofMonticello,Iwasabletoattendanumberofthenational GFOAconferencesandfoundthemverybeneficial.Ihaveattachedthelistingof sessionsthatarebeingofferedatthisyear’sconference. ThepersonnelcommitteediddiscusstheFinanceDirectorandAssistantFinanceDirector attendingtheconferenceandweresupportiveofbothattendingtheconferenceandthe Citypayingreasonableexpensesrelatedtotheconference. A1.BudgetImpact:Thefinancedepartmenthasabudgetof$4,300fortraveland conferencesfor2012.TheCitycouldpayforconferenceregistrationandairfare CityCouncilAgenda:4/9/12 2 forthenationalGFOAconferenceand,withtheotherconferencesandtraining thefinancedepartmentusuallyattends,wouldstillbewithinbudget. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:TheFinanceDirectorwouldbeoutoftheofficefrom FridaythroughWednesdayandtheAssistantFinanceDirectorwouldbeoutofthe officefromMondaythroughWednesday. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoauthorizetheFinanceDirectorandAssistantFinanceDirectortoattend theNationalGFOAConferenceinChicago,ILinJune2012withtheCitypaying forreasonableconferenceexpensesestimatedat$2000. 2.MotiontoauthorizetheFinanceDirectorandAssistantFinanceDirectortoattend theNationalGFOAConferenceinChicago,ILwiththeCitypayingforsome othershareofconferenceexpenses,asdirectedbyCouncil. 3.MotiontonotauthorizetheFinanceDirectorandAssistantFinanceDirectorto attendtheNationalGFOAConferenceinChicago,IL. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: 1.CitystaffandPersonnelCommitteerecommendsAlternative#1toauthorizethe FinanceDirectorandAssistantFinanceDirectortoattendtheNationalGFOA ConferenceinChicago,ILwiththeCitypayingforreasonableconference expenses. . D.SUPPORTINGDATA: ConferenceinformationandlistofsessionsfromGFOA CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 5E.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-034acceptingEasementAgreement withNorthernStatesPowerCompany/XcelEnergyfortherealignmentof120th StreetnorthofInterstate94 (BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: DuringtheWrightCountyStateAidHighway75bridgeremovalandroadway realignmentprojectatthewestendoftheCity,theCountyrealignedtheportionof 120th StreetNEbetweenInterstateHighway94andCSAH75asillustratedinthe highlightedareaoftheattachedWrightCountyHighwayRightofWayPlatNo.66. TheMinnesotaDepartmentofTransportation(Mn/DOT),formerlytheMinnesota HighwayDepartment,originallyconveyedtheroadwayeasementfor120th StreetNEto theCountybywayofQuitClaimDeed.Thisroadwayeasementwasthenrevokedto theCitybytheCountyin1985.SeeResolutionNo.85-18attached.Thisroadway conveyanceisshownontheplat.Thesectionof120th StreetNElyingwestofI-94 wasrevokedtoMonticelloTownshipatthesametime. XcelEnergy(dbaNSP)ownedthelandunder120th StreetNEandpreviouslygrantedthe CityaRoadwayRight-of-WayEasementfortheoldalignmentof120th StreetNE.This oldroadwayright-of-wayeasementwasvacatedwhentheCityCouncilapprovedthe CooperativeAgreementbetweenXcelEnergyandtheCityonJuly11,2011,whichis attachedassupportingdata.Thisagreementassuredbothpartiestheexchangeofreal estateinterestsrequiredfortherealignmentof120th StreetNEwasacceptabletoeach. Thenewroadwayrightofwayeasementfor120th StreetNEnowneedstobeconveyed. AttachedisFigureAshowingtheoldeasementareahighlightedinpurple,andFigureB whichshowstheneweasementareahighlightedinyellow. TheoriginalRoadwayRight-of-WayEasementfor120th StreetNEasvacatedbythe CitypertheCooperativeAgreementcontainedapproximately44,576squarefeet,or 1.023Acre("CitytoNSPConveyance")ItisestimatedthenewRoadwayRight-of- WayEasementareatobegrantedtotheCitybyNSP("NSPtoCityConveyance")is approximately57,514squarefeet,or1.32Acres.ThisNSPtoCityConveyanceis conveyedasagrantofeasement. NSPwasresponsibleforitsdocumentpreparation,titleworkandclosingcosts.Wright CountywasresponsibleforallsuchcostsonbehalfoftheCity.TheCityshallbe responsibleforallfuturemaintenanceoftherealignedsectionof120 th StreetNE. A1.BudgetImpact:TheCityisrequiredtopay$1forthiseasement.Asperthe previouslyapprovedCooperativeAgreement,WrightCountyagreedtobearall costsonbehalfoftheCityforallrequireddocumentpreparation,titleworkand closingcostsrelatedtotherealignmentof120th StreetNE. CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 2 A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Impactstostaffwillbeminimal. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2012-034acceptingEasementAgreementwith NorthernStatesPowerCompany/XcelEnergyfortherealignmentof120th Street northofInterstate94. 2.MotiondenyingadoptionofResolution#2012-034atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: CityResolution#2012-034 EasementAgreement-120th StreetNERoadwayRight-of-WayEasement WrightCountyHighwayRightofWayPlatNo.66 WrightCountyResolutionNo.85-18 CooperativeAgreement-120th StreetNERoadwayRight-of-WayEasement FigureA-Existingroadwayright-of-wayeasement FigureB-Newroadwayright-of-wayeasement CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2012-034 APPROVINGEASEMENTAGREEMENTWITHXCELENERGYFOR ROADWAYRIGHTOFWAYEASEMENTFOR120TH STREETNE WHEREAS,120th StreetNEwasrealignedaspartofWrightCounty’sCountyStateAid Highway(CSAH)75realignmentproject,SAP086-675-013;and WHEREAS,XcelEnergy(dbaNSP)ownsthepropertyoccupiedby120th StreetNEbetween InterstateHighway94andCSAH75;and WHEREAS,XcelEnergyformerlygrantedtheCityofMonticelloaroadwayright-of-way easementforthepreviousalignmentofthissectionof120th StreetNE;and WHEREAS,XcelEnergyandtheCityofMonticelloagreedtovacatethepreviousroadway right-of-wayeasementandestablishanewroadwayright-of-wayeasementtoaccommodatethe realignmentof120th StreetNEasdefinedintheCooperativeAgreementbetweenXcelEnergy andtheCityofMonticelloasexecutedonJuly11,2011. NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello, Minnesota,saidEasementAgreementoutliningtheconveyanceofaperpetualroadwayright-of- wayeasementfortherealignmentof120StreetNEwithWrightCounty’sCSAH75projectis herebyapproved. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis9th dayofApril,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO _________________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CERTIFICATION STATEOFMINNESOTA COUNTYOFWRIGHT Iherebycertifythattheforegoingisatrueandcorrectcopyofaresolutiondulypassed, adoptedandapprovedbytheMonticelloCityCouncilattheirscheduledmeetingonApril9, 2012,andrecordedinminutesofsaidmeeting. ____________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator NotaryPublic:_______________________________ Date:___________________________ (STAMP) CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 5F.ConsiderationofratifyingtheFiberNetservicesratestructureforJune2012-May 2013asapprovedbytheFiberNetAdvisoryBoard (BR) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: CityCouncilisaskedtoformallyratifythecurrentFiberNetservicesratestructure coveringJune2012toMay2013asprescribedintheFiberNetMonticellogovernance ordinance.Asyouknow,HBCidentifiedtheinitialratesatthetimeservicewas instituted,workingwithintheparametersofthebusinessplanandwiththeassistanceof theFiberAdvisoryBoard.Therateincreaseisdirectlycorrelatedtothecostincrease thatFiberNetrecentlyreceivedfromitcontentproviders.Thisishousekeepingaction intendedtoformallyratifyadoptionoftheratescurrentlybeingappliedalongwiththe proposedchanges.Aletterwillgoouttoallcustomers30dayspriortotheincreaseand thatletterisalsoattached. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:None B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoratifytheFiberNetservicesratestructureforJune2012-May2013. 2.MotiontonotratifytheFiberNetservicesratestructureforJune2012-May2013. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.TheFiberNetAdvisoryBoardformallyapproved theratestructureattheirFebruary21st meetingandrecommendsthatitberatifiedbythe CityCouncil. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: CopiesofcurrentratestructurefromFNMwebsite LetterthatwillgotoallresidentsinMonticello–listsratechanges April20th,2012 DearLoyalCustomer, FiberNetcontinuestodevelopnewandbetterwaystobringtheservicesweoffertoyourhome. Itisbecauseofcustomerslikeyouthatwecontinuetochallengeourselves.Weprideourselves onprovidingthemostcourteous,helpful,andpositivecustomerserviceexperiencepossible. FiberNetisdedicatedtobringingyouthebestproductsatthemostaffordableprices.Whilewe attempttodothat,though,thecosttoobtaintheprogrammingthatyouwatchhascontinued toincreasedramatically.Theseescalatingcostsmakeitnecessaryforustoalsoadjustour rates. BeginningJune2,2011,thefollowingrateswillbeineffect: ServiceDescriptionWasNow MonticelloBasic(OneService)$13.80$15.80 MonticelloBasic(TwoServices)$13.20$15.20 MonticelloBasic(ThreeServices)$12.80$14.80 MonticelloExpanded(OneService)$46.85$50.80 MonticelloExpanded(TwoServices)$44.85$48.80 MonticelloExpanded(ThreeServices)$43.55$47.50 So,forlessthan$.13centsperday,youcanexpectustocontinuetoeagerlylistenandrespond toyoursuggestionsandneeds;improveeveryproductthatwebringtoyourhomeorplaceof business;bringyouthebestinlocalnews,weather,sportsandlocalfeatures;allofwhichwillbe deliveredwiththesameexcellentandpromptservicetowhichyouhave becomeaccustomed. Respectfully, BenRanft GeneralManager FiberNetMonticello CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 5G.ConsiderationofapprovingaConditionalUsePermitforanattachedMajor AccessoryStructureinanR-1(Single-Family)DistrictforLot1,Block1,River Forest.Applicant:Curtis,Greg (AS) A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND: Property:Legal:Lot7,Block1,RiverForest Address:9747RiverForestDrive PlanningCaseNumber:2012-008 Request(s):ConditionalUsePermitforMajorAccessoryStructure DeadlineforDecision:April30th,2012 (60days) LandUseDesignation:“PlacestoLive” ZoningDesignation:R-1,Single-FamilyResidential Thepurposeofthe"R-1"singlefamilydistrictistoprovide forlowdensity,singlefamily,detachedresidential dwellingunitsanddirectlyrelatedcomplementaryuses. CurrentSiteUse:Single-familyhome,23,816squarefootresidentiallot SurroundingLandUses: North:Single-familyresidential,zonedR-1 East:Single-familyresidential,zonedR-1 South:Single-familyresidential,zonedR-1 West:Single-familyresidential,zonedR-1 ProjectDescription:ConditionalUsePermittoallowtheconstructionofan expansiontoanexistingattachedaccessorystructure ANALYSIS GregCurtisisrequestingapprovalofaConditionalUsePermittoallowforanexpansion toanexistingattachedaccessorystructureathispropertylocatedat9747RiverForest Drive,intheRiverForestneighborhood. Theapplicant’sexistingattachedaccessorystructureisa484squarefoottwo-stall garage.Thereisalsoanexisting672squarefeetdetachedgaragelocatedintherearyard oftheproperty. CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 2 Theapplicantisproposingtoaddathirdstalltotheexistingtwo-stallgarage.The proposedfootprintoftheexpansionareais200squarefeet(10’x20’).Thisaddition wouldresultin1,356squarefeetintotalfootprintareaforaccessorystructuresonthe property. ZoningOrdinanceRequirements TheZoningOrdinancepermitsatotalofupto1,200squarefeetofgaragespaceas permittedaccessoryspaceforanR-1SingleFamilyhome.Inaddition,noaccessory buildingcanexceedmorethan10%oftherearyardarea,andmaynotexceedthegross squarefootageoftheprincipalbuilding’sfootprint.However,thesestandardsmaybe exceeded,upto1,500squarefeetoftotalarea,withaConditionalUsePermitmeetingthe followingconditions: a.Accessorybuildingspaceistobeutilizedsolelyforthestorageofresidential personalpropertyoftheoccupantoftheprincipaldwelling,andnoaccessory buildingspaceistobeutilizedforcommercialpurposes. Staffcomment:Theapplicant’snarrativeindicatespurposeandintenttocomply.Itis notedthatabonusroomabovethegarageisincludedwithintheexpansionproposed. Thebonusroomdoesnotimpacttherequestintermsoffootprintareaofaccessory structures,asthespacewillactuallybecomepartoftheprincipalusearea. b.Theparcelonwhichtheaccessorybuildingistobelocatedisofsufficientsize suchthatthebuildingwillnotcrowdtheopenspaceonthelot. Staffcomment:Thepropertyisoverone-halfacreinsize.Theproposedexpansionwill createatotalbuiltfootprintareaof2,516squarefeet,orjustover10%ofthetotallot area.Therefore,thelotareaismorethanadequatetosupporttheproposedexpansion. c.Theaccessorybuildingwillnotbesolargeastohaveanadverseeffectonthe architecturalcharacterorreasonableresidentialuseofthesurroundingproperty. Staffcomment:Theapplicanthasprovidedanillustrationoftheproposedaddition.The additionisconsistentwiththesurroundingproperties,whicheachhavethird-stall attachedgarages.Theproposedexpansiontotheexistingaccessorystructurealso complieswithcoderequirementsforsetback.Thecoderequiresa6’setbackonthe garageside;theapplicantisproposinganapproximately12’setback. Theapplicanthasindicatedbothwithinthenarrativeandonthesurveydrawingthatitis theirintenttoexpandthedrivewayconcurrentwiththisstructuralexpansion. Theapplicantwillberequiredtocomplywithordinancerequirementspertainingto drivewaysetback(3’),surfacing,maximumcurbcut,andotheroff-streetparking requirements.Thedrivewayexpansionwillbereviewedwiththebuildingpermit applicationtoensurecompliance. CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 3 d.Theaccessorybuildingsshallbeconstructedtobesimilartotheprincipalbuilding inarchitecturalstyleandbuildingmaterials. Staffcomment:Theapplicant’snarrativeindicatesthattheadditionwillbeconstructed consistentwiththeexistinghomeintermsofstyleandmaterials.Theapplicantintends tomatchsiding,trimandbrickandhasprovidedsamplesofeach.Theapplicanthasalso provideddetailsrelatedtoproposedlandscaping. Theapplicationmeetsallotherrequirementsforaccessorystructuresasfoundin ordinancesections5.3(B),GeneralStandardsandLimitationsforAccessoryUsesand Structures.Itshouldbenotedthattheexistingdetachedstructurealsocomplieswithall coderequirementsrelatedtosetbackand10%threshold. PlanningCommissionRecommendation ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonthisitemonTuesday,April3rd.The applicant,Mr.Curtiswaspresent.Nootherpubliccommentwasgiven. ThePlanningCommissionrecommendedapprovaloftheCUPunanimously. A1.BudgetImpact:None. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:None. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapprovetheConditionalUsePermitforMajorAccessoryStructurefor Lot7,Block1,RiverForest,basedonfindingsasadoptedbythePlanning CommissioninResolution2012-032,withconditionsasnotedinExhibitZ. 2.MotiontodenyapprovalofaConditionalUsePermitforMajorAccessory StructureforLot7,Block1,RiverForest,basedonafindingtobemadebythe CityCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1,approvaloftheCUP,basedonfindingsthatthe buildingwillmeetboththeintentandthespecificstandardsofthezoningordinance.The parcelisofadequatesizetosupporttheproposedexpansionandtheproposedexpansion isconsistentwithboththeexistingstructureandthearchitectureofadjacenthomes. CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 4 D.SUPPORTINGDATA: ExhibitA–PlanningCommissionResolution#2012-032 ExhibitB-SiteLocationMap ExhibitC-ApplicantNarrative ExhibitD-SiteSurvey ExhibitE-ProposedExteriorElevations-Front ExhibitF-SiteImages ExhibitZ–ConditionsofApproval CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2012 –032 Date: April 3rd, 2012 Resolution No. 2012-032 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MAJOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN AN R-1 DISTRICT WHEREAS, Greg Curtis has requested an Conditional Use Permit for a Major Accessory Use at the property legally described as Lot 7, Block 1, River Forest, which is located in an R-1 District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for Conditional Use Permit for Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 3rd, 2012 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The application is consistent with the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan for Places to Live. 2. The proposed accessory building expansion will meet both the intent and the specific standards of the zoning ordinance. 3. The parcel is of adequate size to support the proposed accessory building expansion. 4. The proposed accessory building expansion is consistent with both the existing structure and the architecture of adjacent homes. 5. The proposed use is not expected to diminish or impair property values in the vicinity of the site. 6. The use is not expected to be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or welfare of persons residing near the use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: 1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.357, the application for Conditional Use Permit for Major Accessory Structure in an R-1 (Single-Family Residential) District is hereby recommended to the City Council for approval. 2. The recommendation for approval is subject to those Conditions as follows: a) The use of the accessory structure shall be to directly serve the principal use and must comply with ordinance requirements pertaining to private garages. b) The applicant will be required to comply with ordinance requirements pertaining to driveway setback, surfacing, maximum curb cut, and other off-street parking requirements. c) Issues related to grading and drainage shall be subject to review and comment by the City Engineer. ADOPTED this 3rd day of April 2012, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: _______________________________ Rod Dragsten, Chair ATTEST: ______________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator 1 EXHIBITZ–ConditionsofApproval Lot7,Block1,RiverForest–MajorAccessoryStructureCUP 1.Theuseoftheaccessorystructureshallbetodirectlyservetheprincipaluseandmust complywithordinancerequirementspertainingtoprivategarages. 2.Theapplicantwillberequiredtocomplywithordinancerequirementspertainingto drivewaysetback,surfacing,maximumcurbcut,andotheroff-streetparking requirements. 3.Issuesrelatedtogradinganddrainageshallbesubjecttoreviewandcommentbythe CityEngineer. CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 5H.ConsiderationofarequestforanamendmenttoaConditionalUsePermitto expandastoragefacilityaccessorytoamobilehomeparkintheM-H, ManufacturedHomeParkzoningdistrict.Applicant:Kjellberg’sInc.(NAC) A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND: Property:1000KjellbergEastMobileHomePark Thesiteislocatedinthemidstofthemobilehomepark eastofHighway25,surroundingbymobilehomes,and contiguoustotwoexistingstoragegaragebuildingsthat serveresidentsofthepark. PlanningCaseNumber:2012-009 Request(s):ConditionalUsePermittoconstructanaccessorystorage garagebuilding. DeadlineforDecision:May4,2012 LandUseDesignation:PlacestoLive ZoningDesignation:M-H,MobileHome Thepurposeofthe“M-H”manufacturedhomeparkdistrictis toprovideformanufacturedhomeusersanddirectlyrelated uses. CurrentSiteUse:Currentsiteuseisopenstorageinanexistingmobilehome park. SurroundingLandUses: North:CommercialstripcenterandWal-Mart(northofpowerline easement) East:SingleFamilyResidential South:Agricultural(guidedforresidentialand commercial/industrialuses West:ManufacturedHomePark(acrossTH25) CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 2 ProjectDescription: Theapplicantseekstoconstructanadditiontoexistingaccessorystoragegarageswitha newbuildingofapproximately100feetby24feet(10bays).Thebuildingwouldbe attachedtoanexistingstoragebuildingwhichisconstructedofgalvanized,corrugated steelandshowssignificantsignsofwearanddeterioration.Thenewadditionwould mirrorabuildingconstructedin2005.Materialsforthebuildingconsistofmetalexterior wallsandroofingaroundawoodframeconstruction. ANALYSIS OrdinanceRequirements: ConditionalUsePermitRequirements. IntheM-HDisrict,accessorystoragegaragesareallowedbyConditionalUsePermit, subjecttothefollowingrequirements: (b)IntheM-Hdistrict,thefollowingshallapply: (i)Accessorystoragebuildingsinmanufacturedhomeparks,ifnot reviewedandapprovedaspartofaPUD,shallbeconditionally permittedsubjecttothefollowingadditionalrequirements: 1.Thestoragebuildingandanyaccompanyingoutdoorstorage areashallbeforthesoleuseoftheresidentsofthe manufacturedhomeparkandshallnotbeusedbynon- residents. 2.Accompanyingoutdoorstorageareasshallbefullyscreened fromsurroundingmanufacturedhomeunitsandadjacent properties. Withregardtouse,theapplicantindicatesthatthenewstructurewillbesolelyfortheuse ofresidentsofthepark,andisintendedtosatisfyawaitinglistforsuchstorage.The buildingwillreplaceexistingoutdoorstorage,andassuch,wouldbemoreconformingto thecodethattheexistingcondition. Theapplicant’splansdonotindicateanyadditionallightingtobeincludedwiththenew building.Iflightingiseventuallyadded,itmustbeconstructedinsuchawaythatitdoes notimpactneighboringresidenceswitheitherdirectglareorglow. OtherIssues. ManufacturedHomeParksareallowedunderaseriesofregulationsrelatingtothe developmentandoperationalaspectsofthepark.Oneoftheserequirements,areflection ofstatelaw,relatestoemergencyshelter.Thecurrentordinancerequiresthatsuch sheltersbeestablishedon-site,however,statelawpermitsanevacuationplanapproved bytheCity’semergencyservicesmanagerorbuildingofficial.Thereisnoon-site CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 3 shelter,andassuch,theCityshouldverifythattheparkcanprovideadequateemergency evacuationinaccordancewithstateandlocalregulations. Itshouldbenotedthatanyunrelatedlegalnon-conformitiesexistingonthemanufactured homeparksitemaynotberemediedwiththisapplicationwithoutcompensationbythe City.ThisrestrictioniscodifiedinStateStatute117.184. PlanningCommissionRecommendation ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonthisrequestonApril3rd,2012.The applicant’srepresentative,KirkKjellberg,waspresent.TheCommissionsought clarificationontwopoints–first,whetherthestructurewouldbeutilizedsolelyforthe storageofresidentsoftheparkandsecondly,whetherthestructurewouldbeusedto storematerialscurrentlystoredoutsideintheprojectvicinity.Mr.Kjellbergconfirmed thattheexpandedfacilitywouldbeusedforresidentandparkstoragepurposesonly.He alsoconfirmedthattheexpansionwouldenablethematerialsandequipmentcurrently storedoutsideintheareatobemovedintotheexpandedindoorstoragefacility. Mr.KjellbergstatedthatKjellberg’shadprovidedtheChiefBuildingOfficialwiththe neededinformationpertainingtoemergencyshelterprovisionsandthatKjellberg’s,Inc. intendedtocomplywiththeotherstatedconditionswithinthestaffreport. Nootherpubliccommentwasgivenduringthehearing. ThePlanningCommissionunanimouslyrecommendedapprovaloftheCUPasrequested. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:None B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapproveaConditionalUsePermitfora10-bayaccessorystorage garageasproposedintheapplicationofMarch5,2012,basedonfindingsas adoptedbythePlanningCommissioninResolution2012-033,contingenton compliancewiththoseconditionsspecifiedinExhibitZ. 2.MotiontodenyapprovalofaConditionalUsePermitforaccessorystorage garage,basedonfindingstobemadebytheCityCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMNDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1forapprovaloftheConditionalUsePermitas presented,subjecttotheconditionslistedinExhibitZ.Theadditionalbuildingarea CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 4 meetsthenominaltermsoftheordinance,andreducestheamountofoutdoorstorageon thesitebyreplacingacurrentoutdoorstorageareawithbuildingspace. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: ExhibitA–PlanningCommissionResolution#2012-033 ExhibitB-AerialImage ExhibitC-ApplicantNarrative ExhibitD-SiteImages ExhibitE-BuildingElevations ExhibitF-GradingandDrainagePlan ExhibitZ–ConditionsofApproval CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2012 –033 Date: April 3rd, 2012 Resolution No. 2012-033 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MAJOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN AN R-4 DISTRICT WHEREAS, Kjellberg’s, Inc. has requested an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for a Major Accessory Use at the property which is legally described in Exhibit A, which is located in an R-4 District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for Conditional Use Permit for Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 3rd, 2012 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The application is consistent with the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan for Places to Live. 2. The proposed accessory building expansion will meet both the intent and the specific standards of the zoning ordinance. 3. The parcel is of adequate size to support the proposed accessory building expansion. 4. The proposed structure reduces the outdoor storage on the site by replacing a current outdoor storage area with building space. 5. The use is not expected to be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or welfare of persons residing near the use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: 1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.357, the application for Conditional Use Permit for Major Accessory Structure in an R-4 (Manufactured Home Park) District is hereby recommended to the City Council for approval. 2. The recommendation for approval is subject to those Conditions as follows: a. The City verifies the existence of an emergency evacuation plan meeting the requirements of state and local regulations, or the City approves a new plan to be proposed by the applicant. b. If lighting is to be added, the applicant light the area in such a way as to ensure that no light glare or glow impacts neighboring residents. c. No outdoor storage is approved as a part of this CUP, and as indicated by the applicant, existing outdoor storage will be removed as a result of the construction of this building. If any existing outdoor storage is to be relocated, a separate CUP is required pursuant to the requirements of the zoning ordinance. ADOPTED this 3rd day of April 2012, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: _______________________________ Rod Dragsten, Chair ATTEST: ______________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator 1 ExhibitZ–ConditionsofApproval ConditionalUsePermitforAccessoryStorageGarageBuilding KjellbergEastMobileHomePark 1.TheCityverifiestheexistenceofanemergencyevacuationplanmeetingthe requirementsofstateandlocalregulations,ortheCityapprovesanewplantobe proposedbytheapplicant. 2.Iflightingistobeadded,theapplicantlighttheareainsuchawayastoensurethatno lightglareorglowimpactsneighboringresidents. 3.NooutdoorstorageisapprovedasapartofthisCUP,andasindicatedbytheapplicant, existingoutdoorstoragewillberemovedasaresultoftheconstructionofthisbuilding. Ifanyexistingoutdoorstorageistoberelocated,aseparateCUPisrequiredpursuantto therequirementsofthezoningordinance. CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 5I.Considerationofapprovingpurchaseoftelevisionsanddigitalsignsoftware, includingtheinstallationofequipmentandsoftware,withfundingfromCable Commissionfranchisefeereimbursements (KB/BR/JO) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: Aswe’veresearcheddigitalsignageoptionsfortheCrossPerformanceTeam(CPT)tobe usedbyalldepartmentsoftheCitywithcustomertraffic,wefoundthatthenumberof digitalsignageoptionswasoverwhelming.Becausewehadveryspecificgoalsforthis programandavarietyofendusersofvaryingcapabilities,weknewthatitwasimportant tonarrowdowntheoptionstotheonesthatwouldsuitourneedsandcostexpectations. WeexpectationthisdigitalsignageprogramtodisplaygeneralCitymessagesandsite specificmessagesonTVmonitorsatvariouslocations,butthemessagefiles(orscreens) willalsobesavedinaformattoallowittobeplayedonourFiberNetMonticellovideo channels.Wealsoplantousethescreenstocreateflyers,whichcouldbesavedasweb pages,andforotherpromotionalopportunities.Itisimportantthatthescreencreation programbeeasyenoughtousesothateachdepartmentfeelscomfortablemakingregular additionstothegeneralCitymessagesorsitespecificmessagesfortheirparticular location.Themessagesonthesignneedtobeupdatedregularlysotheyarefresh,which encouragesourcustomersto“watch”regularly. WelearnedthatBillBruce,theTechnicalConsultantfortheSherburne-WrightCable Commission,isacontractorinthedigitalsignagearea.BecauseKittyBaltoshashadso muchexperienceworkingwithBillBruceintheCity’sA/Vroom,sheknewthat,not onlyishetechnicallyknowledgeable,butheclearlyunderstandsthattheendusermight notbetechnicallysavvyandwillbenefitfromauser-friendlycreationsystem.We contactedBillBruceaboutassistingusthroughthejungleofdigitalsignageoptionsand whatwouldworkbestforus. ThecommunitycenterwillutilizefourTVmonitorstodisplaythevideomessage,one pairoutsideofCityHallandonepairattheirmainGuestServiceCounter.The DepartmentofMotorVehiclesandtheLiquorStorewilleachhaveoneTVmonitor. Thesesiteswillutilizethedigitalsoftwareforcreatingmessages. Inaddition,wewillpushthegeneralCitymessagestoaFiberNetcablechannel.Inturn, theFiberNetcustomercareofficeandthePublicWorksofficewilleachuseTVstoplay thegeneralmessagesfromtheFMNcablechannel.Thecommunitycenterwillrecycle itsTVsforpublicworkstouse. Welookedatsixdifferentdigitalsignageoptionsthroughwebinarsandconferencecalls, andweallagreedthatAVIewwouldbethebestoptionandmeetsallofourexpectations. AVIisthecompanythatprovidesAVIewandtheyareaMinnesotacompanylocatedin EdenPrairie,MN.WereceivedafullquotefromAVI;someoftheothercompanies providedgeneralpriceestimatesatthetimewespokewiththem. CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 2 Thisdigitalsignageprogramwillrequireequipment,wiring,software,technicalsupport, andfuturecosts.Theyarebrokendownbelow. DIGITALSIGNAGEEQUIPMENT: DigitalMediaPlayer1 -(3)atacostof$4,195each$12,585 PredesignedTemplatePackagesforAVIew$275 SubscriptionforRSSFeeds(1-10screens)$725 DualContentLicense(2)$1,410 TOTAL$14,995 1IncludedinthecostoftheDigitalMediaPlayeristheirManagedServicesProgramfor oneyearwhichisContenthosting,WatchDogRemoteMonitoring,ExtendedHardware, SoftwareSupport,HelpDesk,Cat5e,HDMIcablesandAVIewLicense. MONITORS&MOUNTING:AVI RETAIL2 (Commercial)(onlineprices) (5)SamsungHE40A40”LED-LCDTV$1,075ea$700-$947ea (Costistimes5monitors:4-MCC&1-DMV) (1)SamsungHE46A46”LED-LCDTV1,450$1,500 (LiquorStore) Mountinghardware(estimate)3 $2,500$2,500 TOTALS$9,325$8,735 2OurresearchshowedthatthelifespandifferencesforacommercialTVmonitoranda televisionisnegligible.Specificationsindicatebetween60,000to100,000hoursfor each.ThereareoversizedfansonthecommercialTVmonitorsthatmayextendthelife ofthemonitorconsideringthecontinuousnumbersofhoursthemonitorswillrun,for examplethecommunitycenterwillrunover5,650hoursperyear.PerBillBruce,the largerconcernisthepowersupplydifferencesbetweencommercialandretail.Generally thepowersupplyonacommercialunitwillhavealongerlife. 3Untilwe’reabletogetintoceilingsandsoffitsatthecommunitycenter,we’reunsure whatmountinghardwarewouldbeneeded.Theremayalsobeadditionalequipment needed,suchasadaptors. CAT5or6WIRINGANDELECTICAL: WesOlsonElectric–MCC$1,230 WesOlsonElectric-DMV&Liquor$800 TOTAL$2,030 TOTALCOSTSFOR2012: AVI$26,350 AVI/RETAIL$25,760 CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 3 FUTURECOSTS: HostedbyCityofMonticello$695/year (Unknownserverrequirements) HostedbyAVI$1,195/year A1.BudgetImpact:TheCityintendstouseFranchisefeesprovidedtotheCityto purchaseandmaintaintheequipment.PerTomKelly,thebalancefromthe franchisefeereimbursementsis$117,639. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:EitherthePublicWorks,FiberNetorCommunity CenterstaffwillneedtomounttheTVmonitors.FiberNetwillrunthewiringfor theDMVandfortheLiquorStore.Thecommunitycenter’swiringneedsare morecomplicatedrequiringalicensedelectriciantoruncableandwireelectrical. EachDepartmentwillneedtodesignateindividual(s)tokeepthedigitalsignage messagesfreshonadailyorweeklybasis. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapprovethepurchaseofAVIewDigitalSignageSoftware,AVITV monitors,andutilizeWesOlsonElectricatthepriceslistedabove. 2.MotiontoapprovethepurchaseofAVIewDigitalSignageSoftware,a combinationofAVIandretailTVmonitors,andutilizeWesOlsonElectricatthe priceslistedabove. 3.Motiontodenythepurchaseofthedigitalsignagesoftwarepackageatthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#2,providingtheCitywiththeabilitytogetthebest pricingonTVmonitors.Itwasdeterminedthatthelifespanofcommercialversus regulartelevisionsisnegligible;thereforepurchasingtelevisionsatthemostreasonable priceisthebestoption. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: AVISystemsquote Currentpricesfrommajorretailersfortelevisions(on-line) QuoteonwiringfromWesOlsonElectric CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 7.PublicHearing-ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#558amendingthe2012Fee ScheduleforanAnimalControlpermitfee,andcontinuethePublicHearingto April23,2012forfurtherconsiderationofBOD5andTSSrates (TK/CS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: ThefeesforservicesperformedbytheCityaresetbyCityordinanceandarereviewed annually.TheCityCouncilapprovedthe2012FeeScheduleatitsDecember12th meetingwiththeexceptionofthewaterandsewerrates.Severalamendmentshavebeen madetotheFeeSchedulesincethattime.CitystaffiscurrentlystudyingtheBOD5and TSSindustrialsewerrateswhichaffectCargillKitchenSolutions.Thosestudiesarenot completeyet,sostaffisrequestingCounciltocontinuethePublicHearingtoApril23rd to considerthoserateadjustmentsatthattime. AtthisCouncilmeeting,staffisrecommendingadoptionofanAnimalControlpermitfee forsituationswhereresidentsmayrequestandmeettheordinancerequirementstokeep fowlontheirpremises.StaffandAnimalControlOfficerPattySalzwedelaresuggesting afeeof$50tocoverstafftimeforprocessingtheapplication,inspectionsandoversight relatedtothepermit.Thispermitfeewouldcoordinatewiththeordinancechangestobe adoptedinagendaitem#5C,whichwouldthenreferencetheFeeScheduleforthecostof thepermit. A1.BudgetImpact:Minimalimpactforpublishingcosts. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Thisitemwouldrequiresomeadditionalstafftimeto workontheindustrialsewerratestudiesandmeetwithCargill. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#558amendingthe2012FeeScheduletoincludean AnimalControlpermitfeeof$50forkeepingfowlonpremises;alsotocontinue thePublicHearingtoApril23,2012forfurtherconsiderationofBOD5andTSS rates. 2.Motionofother. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffsupportsAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: OrdinanceNo.558 CopyofCityCodeTitle6,Chapter3–Animals;Fowl (refertohighlightedsection) ORDINANCENO.558 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTHE2012FEESCHEDULE TITLE20OFTHEMONTICELLOCITYCODE ITISHEREBYORDAINED bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota: Section1.TheFeeSchedulecategory,ANIMALCONTROL,oftheMonticelloCityCode shallbeamendedbyaddingthefollowing: PermitforKeepingFowlonPremises$50 Section2.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassage andpublication.TheordinanceinitsentiretyshallbepostedontheCitywebsite afterpublication.CopiesofthecompleteOrdinanceareavailableonlineandat MonticelloCityHallforexaminationuponrequest. ADOPTEDANDAPPROVEDFORPUBLICATIONBY theCityCounciloftheCityof Monticello,Minnesota,this9thdayofApril,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: JeffO’NeillCityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 8.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#545approvingamendmentstoTitle10, MonticelloZoningOrdinance,Section3.7relatedtoOverlayordinancesregulating theMississippiWild,Scenic&RecreationalRiverDistrictandtheShoreland DistrictandamendmentstoSection8-Definitions,andrepealingChapter27 regulatingtheManagementoftheMississippiWild,Scenic,andRecreationalRiver SystemandtheShorelandAreasoftheCityofMonticello;alsoadoptingSummary Ordinance#545Aforpublication (AS) A.REFEERENCE&BACKGROUND: Aspartofthe2010/2011comprehensiveZoningOrdinanceamendmentprocess,which wasundertakenspecificallytosupporttheadopted2008ComprehensivePlan,theCity commencedtherevisionofexistingMississippiWild,Scenic&Recreationalregulations andShorelandordinances.Theadoptionofrevisionstotheseordinanceslaggedbehind theadoptionofthebalanceofthezoningcode,duetotheneedtoconsultwiththe DepartmentofNaturalResourcesontheproposedamendments. TheCityofMonticelloisrequiredbytheStatetoadoptboththeMississippiWild,Scenic andRecreationalordinanceandtheShorelandordinanceduetothepresenceofstate- designatedpublicwaterswithintheCityandthedesignationoftheMississippiRiveras “Recreational”underWild&Scenicregulations. Atthepresenttime,thetwoordinancesareincombinedformasChapter27ofthe previousversionoftheZoningOrdinance.Theproposedordinancesseparatethetwo provisions,asrequiredandrecommendedbytheDepartmentofNaturalResources. BothoftheMississippiWild,ScenicandRecreationalandtheShorelandordinances becomeoverlaydistrictstothebasezoningdistrictsandactasasecondlayerof regulationforpropertieslyingwithintheboundariesoftheoverlaydistricts.The boundariesofthedistrictsaresetbyStatestatute. Thezoningmapillustratingtheboundariesofbothdistrictsisattachedtothisreport. Earlyintherevisionanddraftingprocess,staffmetwiththeCity’sregionalDNR representative,RogerStradal,todevelopabetterunderstandingofexistingtemplate ordinancesandtheprocessforrevisionandadoptionofnewordinances.Mr.Stradalhas aidedtheCityindevelopingtheordinancesconsistentwithstatutes. Atthistime,theCityhasreceivedfinalcommentfromtheDNRonboththeMississippi Wild,Scenic&RecreationalordinanceandtheShorelandordinances.Theordinances presentedforadoptionincorporateallcommentsprovidedbytheDepartmentofNatural Resources.Theordinancespresentedforadoptionareintendedtomeetboththestate’s requirementsforbothShorelandandMississippiWild&Scenicmanagement,butalso furthertheCity’sdevelopmentgoalsasoutlinedintheMonticelloComprehensivePlan. CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 2 MississippiWild,Scenic&RecreationalRiver(MWSRR)District–Overview Minnesota'sWildandScenicRiversProgramwasestablishedbytheStateofMinnesota in1973toprotectriverswhichhaveoutstandingnatural,scenic,geographic,historic, cultural,andrecreationalvalues.TheMississippiRiverisadesignatedWildandScenic river.AspartoftheWildandScenicregulations,thestatehasenactedasetofrulesto assistlocalgovernmentsindevelopingordinanceswhichcomplywithstatute.These rulesaredesignedtoprotecttheriverfrompollution,erosion,andover-development, whichmayimpactthecharacteroftheriver. TheMississippiRiverinMinnesotaissegmentedintoclassificationsof“Wild”,“Scenic” or“Recreational”.Thesedesignationsrelatetoseparaterulesrequirementsforeach classificationtype.ThesegmentoftheriverwhichrunsthroughMonticelloisclassified as“Recreational”.MinnesotarulesrequirethatMonticelloenactoramendsuch ordinancesandmapsfortheMississippiWild&Scenicareaasnecessaryto: A.Establisharecreationalriverlandusedistrictasidentifiedontheland managementmaps,plates1to9inpart6105.0950andthelandusedistrict propertydescriptions; B.Adoptthegeneraldevelopmentstandardsforlandwithintherecreational riverlandusedistrictsinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofparts 6120.2600to6120.3900,asapplicable,exceptthatmarinasshallnotbe allowed;and C.Conformtotheprovisionsandadministrativeproceduresofparts 6105.0010to6105.0070;and6105.0150to6105.0250. TheproposedMissisippiWild,Scenic&Recreational(MWSRR)ordinancehasbeen developedconsistentwithMinnesotastatuteandrules. Specifically,thedraftMWSRRordinanceoutlines: AllowableusesviaCity’susetable(Chapter5),inaccordancewithMNRules Minimumstandardsforlots,includingareaandsetbacks o Commissionwillnotethatthelotareaandsetbackaregenerallyconsistent withtherangesprovidedfortheR-AandR-1districts,withlargerarea requirementsforriparianlotsandlargersetbackrequirementsatthe shoreline. o Bothseweredandunseweredprovisionsareincluded,astheremaybe casesinwhichrecentlyannexedpropertieswithprivatesystemsrequire developmentrequireundertheseregulations. Maximumimpervioussurfacerequirements Additionalperformancestandardsfordensity,structureplacementandstormwater management Limitationsforclear-cuttingandgradingwithintheoverlaydistrict CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 3 o ThisCityreceivesassistanceintheadministrationandenforcementof theseregulationsfromtheWrightCountySoil&WaterDistrictandthe localDNRConservationOfficer. Processfordevelopmentandagencyaction TheMWSRRordinancesprovidetheCitywithasetofregulationsforgoverning developmentwithintheboundaryoftheWild,Scenic&Recreationalareaandmeetthe statutoryandregulatoryrequirementsoutlined. ShorelandDistrict-Overview Asnotedabove,Chapter27oftheZoningOrdinanceiscurrentlyacombinationof regulationspertainingtoboththeWild&ScenicprovisionsandShorelandareas.The proposedordinancesnowseparatethetwoareasasrequiredbystatuteandDNR recommendations. SimilartotheMWSRR,Monticellomustadoptlandusecontrolstoprovideforthe orderlydevelopmentandprotectionofMinnesota'sshorelands(bothriversandlakes). TheordinancewasdevelopedrecognizingthatMinnesotaDNRstatewideminimum shorelandstandardsapplytoalllakesgreaterthan10acresinmunicipalities,andrivers withadrainageareatwosquaremilesorgreater.Thestandards,setbybothstatuteand rule,applytotheuseanddevelopmentofshorelandwithin1,000feetofalakeand300 feetofariver(ortributary)anditsdesignatedfloodplain. TheDNRhascompletedafullinventoryandmappingofallpublicwaterswithinthe City.Theseinventoried/mappedareasincludebothMinnesota’slakesandwetlands. Lakesareshownwitha“P”ontheMonticelloareamapincludedwiththisreport, andwetlandsaremarkedwitha“W”onthemap.Currently,theCityofMonticello municipalboundaryareaincludesonlyonedefined“publicwater”inadditiontothe MississippiandOtterCreek.ThatisthewetlandlocatedbetweentheGroveland neighborhoodandTrunkHighway25. Insummary,theproposedShorelandordinanceincludesthefollowing: Procedureforpermittingandreviewinshorelandareas o PlannedUnitDevelopmentsaresubjecttothereviewandcommentofthe DNR Shorelandclassifications,bothlakeandriver/streams o ClassificationsarecompletedbytheDNR AllowableusesviaCity’susetable(Chapter5),inaccordancewithMNRules o Itshouldbenotedthatcommercialandindustrialusesareallowedas eitherconditionalorpermittedusesin“GeneralUse”districts. Minimumstandardsforlots,includingareaandsetbacks o LotareasaregenerallyconsistentwiththerangesprovidedfortheR-A andR-1districts,withlargerarearequirementsandsetbackrequirements CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 4 forseweredlakeshorepropertieswithintheshorelanddistrictandlarger lotareaandwidthrequirementsforunsewerednon-lakeshoreproperties. o Lotstandardsforareaandwidthforcommercialandindustrialusesareas statedinthezoningordinance’sbaserequirements. o Bothseweredandunseweredprovisionsareincluded,astheremaybe casesinwhichrecentlyannexedpropertieswithprivatesystemsrequire developmentrequireundertheseregulations. Regulationsforshorelandalterations,includinggrading Standardsforpublicinfrastructure o ThestandardsprovideflexibilityfortheCitytositesuchfacilitieswith appropriateattentiontomitigationmeasuresandpreventionoferosion. Stormwatermanagement o Currently,theordinancesetsamaximumimpervioussurfacerequirement of25%.However,thesestandardsmaybeincreasediftheapplicantcan providealternativedesignsandmitigationmeasuressupportingan increase. TheproposedShorelandordinanceprovidestheCitywithasetofregulationsfor governingdevelopmentwithintheboundaryofShorelandareasandmeetsthestatutory andregulatoryrequirementsoutlined. Definitions–Overview TheamendmentstoSection8.4consistofnewdefinitionsthathavebeenadded pertainingtoMWSRRandShorelandprovisionsandminorrevisionstocertainterms consistentwithDNRrecommendations. CorrespondingZoningMapAmendments–Overview WiththeadoptionoftheMississippiWild,Scenic&RecreationalRiverandShoreland OverlayDistricts,theCityisrequiredtoincludetheboundariesofthetwodistrictsonits OfficialZoningMap. WiththeadoptionofthenewordinanceinJanuaryof2011,theCityincorporatedthe statutorilydefinedboundariesfortheMississippiWild&ScenicdistrictontheOfficial ZoningMap.TheCityadoptedtheShorelandboundarywiththeFebruaryadoptionof the2012OfficialZoningMap.Again,theseboundariesaresetbystatuteandwillnot changewithanycommentontheordinancesthemselves.Byadoptingtheordinancesas drafted,theCitywillbeactingtoadopttheofficialmappingforbothdistricts,as required. DNRReviewandCertification StateregulationsalsorequirethattheDepartmentofNaturalResourcesreviewand certifytheShorelandandWild&ScenicprovisionsoftheZoningOrdinance.Thisisdue totherelationshipoftheCitycodestoStatestatute.PendingCounciladoptionofthe CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 5 ordinances,theCitywillsubmitarequestforofficialcertificationoftheMWSRRand ShorelandordinancestotheDNR. ApplicationoftheOrdinances Foreaseofunderstandingthepracticalapplicationoftheordinances,itshouldbenoted thatdevelopmentwithintheboundaryoftheMississippiWild,ScenicandRecreational districtwillbegovernedbytheMWSRRordinances,whileanylakeshore,riveror tributary“publicwater”asclassifiedbytheDNRwillbegovernedbytheShoreland ordinances.Wetlandsdefinedas“publicwaters”areregulatedbytheWetlands ordinance,previouslyadoptedbytheCity.ThisincludesthepondadjacenttoHighway 25,justeastoftheGrovelandneighborhood. PlanningCommissionRecommendation ThePlanningCommissionreviewedtheseordinancesinapublichearingonFebruary21st andinacontinuedhearingonMarch6th.TheCommissionrecognizedthatthe ordinances,forthemostpart,areregulatedbyStateStatutesandRules. TheCommissiondidrequestclarificationontheapplicationoftheordinances,whichhas beenprovidedwithinthisreport,andontheabilityforapropertyownertorebuildunder theseordinancesifsignificantdamagehasoccurredtotheirexistingstructure.In summary,ShorelanddesignatedlotsaretreateddifferentlybytheStatestatutesfrom non-shorelandlotsintermsoftheabilityforpropertyownerstorebuildtothepreviously existingconditionaftersignificantdamage.TheCity“may”allowrebuildingonnon- conforminglotsintheshorelandarea,providedsuchrebuildingmeetsordinancesetback andimpervioussurfacerequirementsasoutlinedwithintheShorelandordinance.If unabletomeetthoserequirements,varianceswouldberequired,whichwouldallowthe Citytoconsideradditionalrelatedperformancestandards. HomesorstructureswithinadesignatedFloodplain(aseparatelyregulateddistrict) areexemptfromtheaboveandinfact,rebuildingisprohibitedwithinthosedistricts. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#545approvingamendmentstoTitle10,Monticello ZoningOrdinance,Section3.7relatedtoOverlayordinancesregulatingthe MississippiWild,Scenic&RecreationalRiverDistrictandtheShorelandDistrict andamendmentstoSection8-Definitions,andrepealingChapter27regulating theManagementoftheMississippiWild,Scenic,andRecreationalRiverSystem andtheShorelandAreasoftheCityofMonticello;alsoadoptingSummary Ordinance#545Aforpublication. Note:SummaryOrdinancerequires4/5th voteforapproval. CityCouncilAgenda:04/09/12 6 2.MotiontotableactionontheamendmenttoMay14th,2012,toallowfor additionalreviewandclarification. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1forapprovaloftheMississippiWild,Scenic& RecreationalRiverDistrictandShorelandstandardsasdrafted. Staff’srecommendationisbasedonfindingscontainedinthesupportingresolution, 2012-022.TheMissisippiWild,Scenic&RecreationalordinancesupportstheCityin protectingtheriverfrompollution,erosion,andover-development,whichmayimpactthe characteroftheriver.TheShorelandordinanceprovidestheregulationsneededforthe CitytomanagetheorderlydevelopmentandprotectionofMinnesota'sshorelands, particularlyastheCitygrowsintotheOrderlyAnnexationArea. Theordinancespresentedarebasedinlargepartontherequiredstatutesandrulesof theStateofMinnesota. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: OrdinanceNo.545 SummaryOrdinanceNo.545A PlanningCommissionResolution#2012-022 MonticelloZoningOrdinanceChapter27-RegulatingtheManagementofthe MississippiWild,Scenic,andRecreationalRiverSystemandtheShorelandAreas oftheCityofMonticello (toberepealedwithOrd545) 2012CityofMonticelloZoningMap MapofDNRClassifiedShorelandAreaswithin1mileofCityBoundary ORDINANCENO.545 Page 1 of 42 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10–MONTICELLOZONING ORDINANCEOFTHEMONTICELLOCITYCODE SECTION3.7,ADDINGNEWOVERLAYZONINGREGULATIONSFOR THESHORELANDDISTRICTANDTHEWILDANDSCENIC RECREATIONALRIVERDISTRICT,ANDREPEALING CHAPTER27OFTHEMONTICELLOZONINGCODE THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLOHEREBYORDAINS: Section1.TheMonticelloZoningCode,Chapter27–RegulatingtheManagementofthe MississippiWild,Scenic,andRecreationalRiverSystemandtheShorelandAreas oftheCityofMonticelloisherebyrepealed. Section2.Table3-14:CCDDevelopmentStandardsisherebyamendedasfollows: TABLE 3-14:CCDDEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS[1] Thecontentsoftherowsentitled“Alluses,”“AccessoryStructures,”and “AdditionalRegulations”areherebyrestatedandincorporatedherein unchanged Other Regulations toConsult (notall inclusive) Section3.3,CommonDistrictRequirements Section3.5(B),StandardsApplicabletoAllBusinessBaseZoning Districts Section3.7(I)(J),CCDResidentialOverlayDistrict Section4.1,LandscapingandScreeningStandards Section4.5,Signs Section4.8,Off-StreetParking Section4.9,Off-StreetLoading Section4.11,BuildingMaterials Section5.2(C)(2)(d),Multi-familyResidentialRegulations Section3.Section3.7–OverlayZoningDistricts,Title10-ZoningOrdinanceis herebyamendedasfollows: Section3.7,subsections(A)through(C)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. Section3.7(D),subsections(1),(2)and(3)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. Section3.7(D)(4)anditssubsection(a)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (b)Thelowestgroundfloorelevationofastructureshallbetwo(2)feetabovethe 100-Yearfloodelevationorthree(3)feetabovetheOrdinaryHighWaterMarkof ORDINANCENO.545 Page 2 of 42 publicwatersregulatedbySection3.7(E)andSection3.7(F)ofthisordinance, whicheverisgreater. Section3.7(D)(4),subsections(c)through(g)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. Section3.7(D)(5)through3.7(D)(9)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (E)ShorelandandWild&ScenicDistrict RESERVED [NOTE:ZoningcodeChapter27ineffectpriortoadoptionofthischaptershallcontinuetobein effectuntilnewlanguageisapprovedforinclusioninthiscodebythe DepartmentofNatural Resources] (E)WildandScenicRecreationalRiverDistrict (1)Purpose Thepurposeofthisdistrictistoprotectandpreservethescenic,recreational,naturaland historicalvaluesoftheMississippiRiverinthecitybycarefullycontrollingdevelopmentof thisrivercorridorconsistentwiththestateWildandScenicRiverAct(Minn.Stats.§ 103F.301etseq.)andMinn.Rules6105.0010to6105.0070;6105.0150to6105.0250;andas applicable,theprovisionof6120.2600to6120.3900. (2)DesignationofDistrict InordertopreserveandprotecttheMississippiRiveranditsadjacentlandwhichpossess scenic,recreational,naturalandhistoricalvalues,theMississippiRiverinthecityhasbeen givenarecreationalriverclassification,andlandsadjacenttotheriverareherebydesignated bylandusedistricts,theboundariesofwhicharebasedupontheMississippiRiver ManagementPlan,Minn.Rules6105.0800--6105.0960.TheprovisionsofSection3.7(E) shallapplytoalllandswithinthejurisdictionofMonticellothataredenotedontheofficial zoningmapasbeingwithintheWildandScenicRecreationalRiveroverlaydistrict.Incase ofconflictbetweenthemapandthepropertydescriptionsandboundariesinMinn.Rules 6105.0910and6105.0950,thelattershallprevail. (3)DistrictApplication TheregulationsandrequirementsimposedbytheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallbeinaddition tothoseestablishedforthebasezoningdistrictswhichjointlyapply.Underthejoint applicationofstandards,themorerestrictiverequirementsshallapply.Anyperson contemplatingdevelopmentintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshouldreviewthebasedistrict requirementswiththeCommunityDevelopmentDepartmenttodeterminewhichregulations willapply. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 3 of 42 (4)SubstandardLots AnylotofrecordfiledintheofficeofthecountyrecorderonorbeforeJuly1,2000,which doesnotmeetthedimensionalrequirementsofthischaptermaybeallowedasabuildingsite subjecttothefollowing: (a)Suchuseispermittedinthelandusedistrict. (b)Thelotwasinseparateownershiponthedateofenactmentoftheordinancefromwhich thischapterisderived. (c)Allsewagedisposalrequirementsarecompliedwithandlotrequirementsarecomplied withtothegreatestextentpractical. (d)Thelotisatleast10,000squarefeetinarea. (e)Ifinagroupoftwoormorecontiguouslotsunderasingleownership,anyindividuallot doesnotmeetthelotwidthrequirementsofthelocalregulation,suchindividuallot cannotbeconsideredasaseparateparceloflandforpurposesofsaleordevelopment,but mustbecombinedwithadjacentlotsunderthesameownershipsothatthecombination oflotswillequaloneormoreparcelsofland,eachmeetingthelotwidthrequirementsof thelocalregulation,ortothegreatestextentpractical. (5)SubstandardUses Anyusesinexistenceonalotofrecordfiledintheofficeofthecountyrecorderonorbefore July1,2000,whicharepermittedusesinaccordancewithChapter5,butdonotmeet minimumsetbacksorotherdimensionalrequirementsoftheordinancearetobeconsideredas substandarduses.Allsubstandarduses,exceptforsubstandardsigns,shallbeallowedto continuesubjecttothefollowingconditionsandexceptions: (a)Anystructuralalterationoradditiontoasubstandardusewhichwillincreasethe substandarddimension(s)shallnotbeallowed. (b)Substandardsignsshallbegraduallyamortizedoveraperiodoftimenottoexceedfive yearsonceamortizationhasbeeninitiatedbytheCity. (6)AllowableUses TheallowableusesintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallbeasallowedinChapter5forthe underlyingzoningclassificationprovidedtheusesareinconformancewiththecriteriafor UrbanRiverClassStandardsinMinn.Rules6120.3100and6120.3200,andwiththecriteria forRecreationalRiversin6105.0100subpart3. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 4 of 42 (7)ConditionalUses (a)ConditionalusesallowablewithintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallbereviewedunderthe provisionsoutlinedinSection2.4(D),andinterimusepermitsforusesorstructures withinWSRRoverlaydistrictshallbereviewedundertheprovisionsoutlinedinSection 2.4(E). (b)Anystructure(s)associatedwithaconditionalusewhichareproposedtobelocatedupon slopesgreaterthan12percentshalladheretothefollowingconditions: (i)Thestructureshallbescreenedfromviewoftheriverandadjacentshorelandsina mannerjudgedacceptablebythecity. (ii)Anadequateconformingsanitarysewerandwatersystemcanbeestablishedonthe site. (iii)Appropriateerosioncontrolmeasuresareundertakenasdeterminednecessarybythe city. (iv)Ifapplicable,vegetativeand/orclear-cuttingpermitsareobtainedfortheproposed useinaccordancewithCityordinance. (8)Recreationalriverlandusesubdistricts–standards,lotdimensions,setbacks,and impervioussurfacerequirements (a)Areascovered Thefollowingareasofthecityarecoveredbythisdivision:allareasofthewildand scenicrecreationalriverdistrictwithinthecity. (b)Standardsforlots LotswithintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallconformtothestandardsinTable3-19. Wherethesestandardsconflictwiththestandardsofthebasezoningdistricts,themore restrictivestandardshallprevail. TABLE3-19:WILD&SCENICLOTREQUIREMENTS RIVERTYPE LotSize LotWidth [1] Wild 6acres 300 feet Scenic 4acres 250feet Recreational 2acres 200feet [1]:LotwidthshallbemetatboththeOHWandattherequiredsetbackfromtheOHWin accordancewithSection8.2(B)(1)(i). ORDINANCENO.545 Page 5 of 42 (c)Standardsforprincipalstructures PrincipalstructureswithintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallconformtothestandardsin Table3-20.Wherethesestandardsconflictwiththestandardsofthebasezoning districts,themorerestrictivestandardshallprevail. TABLE3-20:WILD&SCENICPRINCIPALSTRUCTURESETBACKS Frontyardsetbackandsetbackfromrights-of-wayorroadwayeasements(setbacksmustbemetfrom allroadswhenalotisboundedbytwoormoreroadways) -ArterialRoad 70feet -CollectorRoad 70feet -LocalRoad 30feet -LandlockedParcel 30 feet Unsewered Sewered Sideyardsetbacks 30feet 30feet Rearyardsetbacks 50feet 30feet SetbackfromtheOHWofthe MississippiRiver 100feet 150feet Setbackfromabluffline 75feet 75feet SewersetbackfromtheOWH 75feet 75feet (d)Accessorystructuresetbacks AccessorystructureswithintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallconformtothestandardsin Table3-21.Wherethesestandardsconflictwiththestandardsofthebasezoning districts,themorerestrictivestandardshallprevail. TABLE3-21:WILD&SCENICACCESSORYSTRUCTURESETBACKS Unsewered Sewered SetbackfromtheOHWofthe MississippiRiver 75feet 50feet Setbackfromabluffline 30feet 30feet (e)Impervioussurfacerequirements (i)ImpervioussurfacesonlotswithintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshalladheretothe followingstandards: 1.Impervioussurfacecoverageoflotsmustnotexceed25percentofthelotarea. 2.Whenconstructedfacilitiesareusedforstormwatermanagement,theymustbe designedandinstalledconsistentwiththefieldofficetechnicalguideofthelocal soilandwaterconservationdistricts. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 6 of 42 3.Newconstructedstormwateroutfallstopublicwatersmustprovideforfiltering orsettlingofsuspendedsolidsandskimmingofsurfacedebrisbeforedischarge. (ii)Theprovisionsofsubdivision(i)abovemaybevariedwithoutavarianceifallofthe followingcriteriaandstandardsaremet: 1.Allstructuresandimpervioussurfacesarelocatedonslopeslessthan12percent. Thephysicalalterationofslopesshallnotbepermittedforthepurposeof overcomingthislimitation. 2.Thesitedevelopmentisdesigned,implemented,andmaintainedusingthemost applicablecombinationofcomprehensivepracticesthatpreventflooding, pollutant,erosionandsedimentationproblemsconsistentwithProtectingWater QualityinUrbanAreas:BestManagementPracticesforMinnesota,Minnesota PollutionControlAgency,October1989,orasamended,whichisincorporated byreference,availableatthestatelawlibraryandnotsubjecttofrequentchange. 3.Asitedevelopment,maintenance,andinspectionplanincorporatingthe comprehensivepracticesofthissectionissubmittedandapprovedbythecity priortotheissuanceofanimpervioussurfacingpermitandtheplanis implemented. 4.Thecitymayimposeadditionalconditionsdeterminednecessarytoprotectthe publichealth,safety,andwelfare. (9)BuildingHeight ThefollowingminimumrequirementsshallbeobservedintheWSRRoverlaydistrict: (a)Themaximumheightofprincipalstructuresshallnotexceed25feet. (b)Themaximumheightofaccessorystructuresshallnotexceed25feet. (10)Additionalstructureandusestandards (a)Placementofstructures Structuresshallnotbelocatedonslopesgreaterthan12percentexceptbyconditionaluse permitasprovidedforinsubsection3.7(E)(7). (b)Maximumdensity ThemaximumdensityintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallnotexceedonedwellingunit perlotwiththeexceptionofapprovedaccessorydwellingunits. (c)Multipleunitdwellingstructures Multiplefamilydwellingunitsshallmeetthefollowingadditionalstandards: (i)Eachbuildingmustbesetbackatleast200feetfromtheordinaryhighwaterlevel; ORDINANCENO.545 Page 7 of 42 (ii)Eachbuildingmusthavecommonsewagetreatmentandwatersystemsinone locationandservealldwellingunitsinthebuilding;and (iii)Watercraftdockingfacilitiesforeachlotmustbecentralizedinonelocationand servealldwellingunitsinthebuilding(i.e.onlyonedockingfacilityperlot). (d)Stormwatermanagement Subjecttoothermorerestrictivelimitationswhichmaybeimposedbythisordinance,the followinggeneralandspecificstandardsshallapply: (i)Generalstandards 1.Whenpossible,existingnaturaldrainageways,wetlands,andvegetatedsoil surfacesshallbeusedtoconvey,store,filter,andretainstormwaterrunoffbefore dischargetopublicwaters. 2.Developmentshallbeplannedandconductedinamannerthatwillminimizethe extentofdisturbedareas,runoffvelocities,erosionpotential,andreduceand delayrunoffvolumes.Disturbedareasmustbestabilizedandprotectedassoon aspossibleandfacilitiesormethodsusedtoretainsedimentonthesite. 3.Whendevelopmentdensity,topographicfeatures,andsoilandvegetation conditionsarenotsufficienttoadequatelyhandlestormwaterrunoffusingnatural featuresandvegetation,varioustypesofconstructedfacilitiessuchasdiversions, settlingbasins,skimmingdevices,dikes,waterways,andpondsmaybeused. Preferenceshallbegiventodesignsusingsurfacedrainage,vegetation,and infiltrationratherthanburiedpipesandmanmadematerialsandfacilities. (ii)SpecificStandards 1.Whenconstructedfacilitiesareusedforstormwatermanagement,documentation shallbeprovidedbyaqualifiedindividualthattheyaredesignedandinstalled consistentwiththefieldofficetechnicalguideofthelocalsoilandwater conservationdistricts. 2.Newconstructedstormwateroutfallstopublicwatersshallprovideforfiltering orsettlingofsuspendedsolidsandskimmingofsurfacedebrisbeforedischarge. (e)SpecialProvisionsforCommercial,Industrial,Public/Semipublic,Agricultural,and Forestry (i)Standardsforcommercial,industrial,public,andsemipublicuses 1.Surfacewater-orientedcommercialusesandindustrial,public,orsemipublic useswithsimilarneedsforaccesstoanduseofpublicwatersmaybelocatedon parcelsorlotswithfrontageonpublicwaters.Subjecttoothermorerestrictive limitationswhichmaybeimposedbythischapter,thoseuseswithwater-oriented needsshallmeetthefollowingstandards: a.Inadditiontomeetingimperviouscoveragelimits,setbacks,andother zoningstandardsinthischapter,theusesshallbedesignedtoincorporate topographicandvegetativescreeningofparkingareasandstructures; ORDINANCENO.545 Page 8 of 42 b.Usesthatrequireshort-termwatercraftmooringforpatronsmustcentralize thesefacilitiesanddesignthemtoavoidobstructionsofnavigationandtobe theminimumsizenecessarytomeettheneed;and c.Usesthatdependonpatronsarrivingbywatercraftmayusesignsand lightingtoconveyneededinformationtothepublic,subjecttothefollowing generalstandards: i.Noadvertisingsignsorsupportingfacilitiesforsignsmaybeplacedinor uponpublicwaters.Signsconveyinginformationorsafetymessagesmay beplacedinoronpublicwatersbyapublicauthorityorunderapermit issuedbythecountysheriff. ii.Signsmaybeplaced,whennecessary,withintheshoreimpactzoneif theyaredesignedandsizedtobetheminimumnecessarytoconvey neededinformation.Theyshallonlyconveythelocationandnameof theestablishmentandthegeneraltypesofgoodsorservicesavailable. Thesignsshallnotcontainotherdetailedinformationsuchasproduct brandsandprices,shallnotbelocatedhigherthantenfeetabovethe ground,andshallnotexceed32squarefeetinsize.Ifilluminatedby artificiallights,thelightsshallbeshieldedordirectedtoprevent illuminationoutacrosspublicwaters;and iii.Otheroutsidelightingmaybelocatedwithintheshoreimpactzoneor overpublicwatersifitisusedprimarilytoilluminatepotentialsafety hazardsandisshieldedorotherwisedirectedtopreventdirect illuminationoutacrosspublicwaters.Thisdoesnotprecludeuseof navigationallights. 2.Useswithoutwater-orientedneedsmustbelocatedonlotsorparcelswithout publicwatersfrontage,or,iflocatedonlotsorparcelswithpublicwaters frontage,musteitherbesetbackdoublethenormalordinaryhighwaterlevel setbackorbesubstantiallyscreenedfromviewfromthewaterbyvegetationor topography,assumingsummer,leaf-onconditions. (ii)Agricultureusestandards 1.Generalcultivationfarming,grazing,nurseries,horticulture,truckfarming,sod farming,andwildcropharvestingarepermittedusesifsteepslopesandshore andbluffimpactzonesaremaintainedinpermanentvegetationoroperatedunder anapprovedconservationplan(resourcemanagementsystems)consistentwith thefieldofficetechnicalguidesofthelocalsoilandwaterconservationdistricts orthenaturalresourcesconservationservice,asprovidedbyaqualified individualoragency. a.Theshoreimpactzoneforparcelswithpermittedagriculturallandusesis equaltoalineparalleltoand50feetfromtheordinaryhighwaterlevel. b.Thebluffimpactzoneisequaltothebluffandlandlocatedwithin20feet fromabluffline. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 9 of 42 2.Animalfeedlotsshallmeettherequirementsofthischapter,aswellasthe followingstandards: a.NewfeedlotsshallnotbelocatedintheWSRRoverlaydistrict;and b.Modificationsorexpansionstoexistingfeedlotsthatarelocatedwithin300 feetoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelorwithinthebluffimpactzoneare allowediftheydonotfurtherencroachintotheexistingordinaryhighwater levelsetbackorencroachonbluffimpactzones. 3.Useoffertilizer,pesticides,oranimalwasteswithintheWSRRoverlaydistrict shallbedoneinsuchawayastominimizeimpactontheshoreimpactzoneor publicwaterbyproperapplicationoruseofearthorvegetation. (iii)Forestmanagementstandard 1.Theharvestingoftimberandassociatedreforestationmustbeconducted consistentwiththeprovisionsoftheMinnesotaNonpointSourcePollution Assessment--ForestryandtheprovisionsofWaterQualityinForest Management--BestManagementPracticesinMinnesota. 2.Useoffertilizer,pesticides,oranimalwasteswithintheWSRRoverlaydistrict shallbedoneinsuchawayastominimizeimpactontheshoreimpactzoneor publicwaterbyproperapplicationoruseofearthorvegetation. (iv)Extractiveusestandards 1.Sitedevelopmentandrestorationplan.Anextractiveusesitedevelopmentand restorationplanshallbedeveloped,approved,andfollowedoverthecourseof operationofthesite.Theplanshalladdressdust,noise,possiblepollutant discharges,hoursanddurationofoperation,andanticipatedvegetationand topographicalterations.Itmustalsoidentifyactionstobetakenduringoperation tomitigateadverseenvironmentalimpacts,particularlyerosion,andshallclearly explainhowthesitewillberehabilitatedafterextractiveactivitiesend. 2.Setbacksforprocessingmachinery.Processingmachineryshallbelocated consistentwithsetbackstandardsforstructuresfromtheordinaryhighwater levelandfromblufflines. (11)VegetativeCutting Selectivecuttingoftreesinexcessoffourinchesindiameteratfourfeetheightwithinthe WSRRoverlaydistrictandwithin100feetoftheordinaryhighwaterleveland20feet landwardoftheblufflineshallbesubjecttothefollowing: (a)Clearcutting,exceptforanyauthorizedpublicservicessuchasroadsandessential services,shallnotbepermitted.Clearcuttingforessentialservices,suchastelephone lines,substations,andrelatedstructures,shallrequireaspecialpermitissuedbytheCity Councilinaccordancewith2.4(N)ofthisordinance. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 10 of 42 (b)Cuttingisspacedinseveralcuttingoperationsandacontinuoustreecoverismaintained, uninterruptedbylargeopenings.Incaseswheretheexistingtreecoverhasbeen interruptedbylargeopeningsinthepast,selectivecuttingmaybeperformedsoasto maintainacontinuoustreecoverintheremainingwoodedareas. (c)Theabovecuttingprovisionsshallnotbedeemedtoprevent: (i)Theremovalofdiseasedorinsect-infestedtrees,orofrottenordamagedtreesthat presentsafetyhazards. (ii)Pruningunderstoryvegetation,shrubs,plants,bushes,orgrasses,orharvestingcrops, orcuttingsuppressedtreesortreeslessthanfourinchesindiameteratfour-foot height. (d)Exceptincaseswherevegetativecuttinghasbeenapprovedaspartofasubdivisionor otherdevelopment,anypersonproposingvegetativecuttingshallapplytothecityfora vegetativecuttingpermit.Applicationformsforthepermitshallbeprovidedbythe CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentandrequirethefollowinginformation: (i)Nameandaddressofapplicant. (ii)Thenameandaddressoftheowneroftheland. (iii)Theaddressandlegaldescriptionofthelandinvolved. (iv)Thepurposeofthevegetativecutting. (v)Adescriptionofthetypeandamountofvegetationtobecut. (vi)Thehighway,street,orstreets,orotherpublicwaysinthecityuponandalongwhich anymaterialistobehauledorcarried. (vii)Anestimateofthetimerequiredtocompletethevegetativecutting. (viii)Asiteplanshowingtheproposedcuttingarea. (ix)Aplanorstatementdemonstratingthattheactivitywillinnowayjeopardizethe publichealth,safetyandwelfare. (x)Astatementthattheapplicantwillcomplywithallconditionsprescribedbythecity. (12)ClearcuttingRestrictions ClearcuttingwithintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallbesubjecttothefollowingstandardsand criteria: (a)Clearcuttingshallnotbeusedasacuttingmethodwheresoil,slope,orotherwatershed conditionsarefragileandsubjecttoinjury. (b)Clearcuttingshallbeconductedonlywhereclearcutblocks,patches,orstripsare,inall cases,shapedandblendedwiththenaturalterrain. (c)Thesizeofclearcutblocks,patches,orstripsshallbekeptattheminimumnecessary. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 11 of 42 (d)Wherefeasible,allclearcutsshallbeconductedbetweenSeptember15andMay15.If naturalregenerationwillnotresultinadequatevegetativecover,areasinwhich clearcuttingisconductedshallbereplantedtopreventerosionandtomaintainthe aestheticqualityofthearea.Wherefeasible,replantingshallbeperformedinthesame springorthefollowingspring. (e)Exceptincaseswhereclearcuttinghasbeenapprovedaspartofasubdivisionorother development,anypersonproposingclearcuttingshallapplytothecityforaclearcutting permit.ApplicationformsforthepermitshallbeprovidedbytheCommunity DevelopmentDepartmentandrequirethefollowinginformation: (i)Nameandaddressofapplicant. (ii)Thenameandaddressoftheowneroftheland. (iii)Theaddressandlegaldescriptionofthelandinvolved. (iv)Thepurposeoftheclearcutting. (v)Adescriptionofthetypeandamountofclearcuttingtobeconducted. (vi)Thehighway,street,orstreets,orotherpublicwaysinthecityuponandalongwhich anymaterialistobehauledorcarried. (vii)Anestimateofthetimerequiredtocompletethevegetativecutting. (viii)Asiteplanshowingtheproposedcuttingarea. (ix)Aplanorstatementdemonstratingthattheactivitywillinnowayjeopardizethe publichealth,safetyandwelfare. (x)Astatementthattheapplicantwillcomplywithallconditionsprescribedbythecity. (13)GradingandFilling AnygradingandfillingconductedwithintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallrequireapermit andshallcomplywiththefollowing: (a)Theprovisionsof2.4(N)ofthisordinancearesatisfactorilymet. (b)Gradingandfillingofthenaturaltopographywhichisnotaccessorytoapermittedor conditionaluseshallnotbeallowed. (c)Gradingandfillingofthenaturaltopographywhichisaccessorytoapermittedor conditionaluseshallnotbeconductedwithoutagradingandfillingpermitfromthe zoningauthority. (d)Gradingandfillingofthenaturaltopographywhichisaccessorytoapermittedor conditionaluseshallbeperformedinamannerwhichminimizesearthmoving,erosion, treeclearingandthedestructionofnaturalamenities. (e)Gradingandfillingofthenaturaltopographyshallalsomeetthefollowingstandards: (i)Thesmallestamountofbaregroundisexposedforasshortatimeasfeasible. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 12 of 42 (ii)Temporarygroundcoversuchasmulchisusedandpermanentgroundcoversuchas sodisplanted. (iii)Methodstopreventerosionandtotrapsedimentareemployed. (iv)Fillisestablishedtoacceptedengineeringstandards. (f)Excavationofmaterialfrom,orfillingintheriver,orconstructionofanypermanent structuresornavigationalobstructionsthereinisprohibited,unlessauthorizedbyapermit fromthecommissionerpursuanttoMinn.Stats.§103G.245. (g)Drainingorfillingofwetlandsasdefinedbythischaptershallbeexpresslyprohibited. (14)UtilityTransmissionLines AllutilitytransmissioncrossingsoflandwithintheWSRRoverlaydistrictshallrequirea conditionalusepermit.Theconstructionofsuchtransmissionservicesshallbesubjecttothe standardsandcriteriaofMinn.Rules6105.0170and6105.0180. (15)PublicRoads InadditiontosuchpermitsasmayberequiredbyMinn.Stats.§103G.245,aconditionaluse permitshallberequiredforanyconstructionorreconstructionofnewpublicroadswithinthe WSRRoverlaydistrict.Suchconstructionorreconstructionshallbesubjecttothestandards andcriteriaofMinn.Rules6105.0190and6105.0200.Aconditionalusepermitshallnotbe requiredformarginalaccessstreetswhichareintendedtoserveprimarilyasanaccessto abuttingproperties. (16)LandSuitability Nolandshallbesubdividedwhichisdeterminedbythecityorthecommissionertobe unsuitablebyreasonofflooding,inadequatedrainage,soilandrockformationwithsevere limitationsfordevelopment,severeerosionpotential,unfavorabletopography,inadequate watersupplyorsewagetreatmentcapabilitiesoranyotherfeaturelikelytobeharmfultothe health,safety,orwelfareofthefutureresidentsoftheproposedsubdivisionorthecity. (17)NonconformingUses AllusesinexistencepriortoJuly1,2000,whicharelawfullypermitteduseswithinthewild andscenicrecreationalriverdistrict,butdonotmeettheminimumlotarea,setbacksorother dimensionalrequirementsofthischaptershallbeallowedtocontinuesubjecttothefollowing conditionsandexceptions: (a)Anystructuralalterationoradditiontoanonconformingusewhichwillincreasethe substandarddimensionsshallnotbeallowed. (b)Substandardsignsshallbegraduallyeliminatedoveraperiodoftimenottoexceedfive yearsfromthedateofenactmentoramendmentofthisdivision. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 13 of 42 (18)SewageTreatment (a)PublicSystemRequired Publicly-ownedsewersystemsmustbeused. (b)NonconformingSewageTreatmentSystems Anonconformingsewagetreatmentsystemnotmeetingtherequirementsofapplicable rulesofthestateDepartmentofHealth,thestatepollutioncontrolagency,specifically MinnRulesch.7080,forindividualsewagetreatmentsystems,andanyotherapplicable localgovernmentstandardsshallbebroughtintoconformityordiscontinuedwithinfive yearsofthedateofenactmentoftheWildandScenicRecreationalRiverDistrict Ordinancefromwhichthisdivisionisderived. (19)WaterSupply Anypublicorprivatesupplyofwaterfordomesticpurposesmustmeetorexceedstandards forwaterqualityofthestateDepartmentofHealthandthestatepollutioncontrolagencyand administrativeproceduresofthischapter.Privatewellsmustbelocated,maintained,and sealedinaccordancewithorinamorethoroughmannerthanthewaterwellconstruction codeofthestateDepartmentofHealth. (20)Plats CopiesofallplatswithintheWildandScenicRecreationalRiverDistrictshallbeforwarded totheCommissionerwithintendaysofapprovalbytheCity.Approvalofaplatwhichis inconsistentwiththisdivisionispermissibleonlyifthedetrimentalimpactofthe inconsistencyismorethanovercomebyotherprotectivecharacteristics. (21)PlannedUnitDevelopment Aplannedunitdevelopmentmaybeallowedpertherequirementsofsection2.4(P)only whentheproposeddevelopmentprovidesabettermeansofpreservingagriculturalland,open space,woods,scenicviews,wetlands,andotherfeaturesofthenaturalenvironmentthan traditionalsubdivisiondevelopment.PlannedUnitDevelopmentsshallbereviewedunder theprovisionsoutlinedinSection2.4(P)ofthisordinance,withthefollowingadditional criteria: (a)PreliminaryplansareapprovedbytheCommissioneroftheDepartmentofNatural ResourcespriortotheirenactmentbytheCityCouncil. (b)Apublicly-ownedsewersystemsisused. (c)Openspaceispermanentlypreserved.Thismaybeaccomplishedthroughtheuseof restrictivedeedcovenants,publicdedications,grantingofsceniceasements,orother equallyeffectiveandpermanentmethods. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 14 of 42 (d)Thereisnotmorethanonecentralizedboatlaunchingfacilityforeachclusterofhomes. (e)Theonlyusesthatshallbeallowedwithinthedevelopmentarethoseallowedunder section2.4(P)andtheunderlyingzoningdistrict. (f)Underthejointapplicationofstandards,themorerestrictiveprovisionsofthischapter shallapply. (22)Variances (a)VariancesshallbereviewedundertheprovisionsoutlinedinSection2.4(C)withthe followingadditionalvariancecriteria: (i)Grantingofthevarianceisnotcontrarytothepurposeandintentofthissectionand isconsistentwithMinn.Rules6105.0010--6105.0250and6105.0800--6105.0960. (ii)Grantingofthevariancewillnotallowanyusewhichisneitherapermittedor conditionaluseinthelandusedistrictinwhichthesubjectpropertyislocated. (b)Exception:Whereasetbackpatternfromtheordinaryhighwaterlevelhasalreadybeen establishedonbothsidesofaproposedbuildingsite,thesetbackoftheproposed structuremaybeallowedtoconformtothatpattern.Thisprovisionshallapplyonlyto lotswhichdonotmeettheapplicableminimumlotwidthrequirement. (c)Appealsfromvariancedecisionsonshorelandissuesmaybemadeinaccordancewiththe provisionsofSection2.4(H)andalsoMinnesotaStatutes. (23)NoticetotheDNRofProposedActionswithintheWildandScenicRecreationalRiver District (a)NotificationofProposals (i)ForpropertieswithintheWildandScenicRecreationalRiverDistrict,the CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentshallnotifytheCommissionerofthe DepartmentofNaturalResourcesofanyapplicationforavariance,ordinance amendment(includingproposedchangestodistrictlines),conditionalusepermits, PUDs,andplats. (ii)NotificationsforordinancechangesandPUDsshallconsistofacopyoftheproposed ordinanceamendment(s),acopyoftheproposedPUD,andallotherapplication materialsasmaybeneededbytheCommissionertofullyunderstandtheproposal. (iii)Notificationsforvariances,platsorCUPsmayconsistsimplyofthenoticeofthe applicablepublichearing,orifapublichearingisnotrequired,acopyofapplication materialsasmaybeneededbytheCommissionertofullyunderstandtheproposal. (iv)NotificationshallbesentsoastobereceivedbytheCommissioneratleast30days priortotheplannedhearingormeetingtoconsidertherequestedaction. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 15 of 42 (b)Notificationoffinaldecision TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentshallnotifytheCommissioneroftheCity’s finaldecisionontheproposedactionwithinten(10)daysofthedecision. (c)Effectivedateofdecision (i)Decisionsonvariances,platsorCUPsbecomeeffectiveuponcompletionofthe applicablereviewprocessattheCitylevel. (ii)DecisionsonPUDsandordinanceamendmentswithinoraffectingtheWildand ScenicRecreationalRiverDistrictbecomeeffectiveuponthehappeningofanyofthe followingevents,whicheverfirstoccurs: 1.Thefinaldecisiontakenbythecityhaspreviouslyreceivedcertificationof approvalfromtheCommissioneroftheDepartmentofNaturalResources. 2.ThecityreceivescertificationofapprovalfromtheCommissionerofthe DepartmentofNaturalResourcesafteritsfinaldecision. 3.ThirtydayshaveelapsedfromthedaytheCommissioneroftheDepartmentof NaturalResourcesreceivednoticeofthefinaldecision,andthecityhasreceived fromtheCommissionerneithercertificationofapprovalnornoticeofnon- approval. 4.TheCommissioneroftheDepartmentofNaturalResourcescertifieshisapproval within30daysafterconductingapublichearing. (d)Hearingafternon-approval IncasetheCommissioneroftheDepartmentofNaturalResourcesgivesnoticeofaPUD orproposedordinanceamendment,eithertheapplicantorCommunityDevelopment Departmentmay,within30daysofsaidnotice,filewiththeCommissionerademandfor ahearing.Ifthedemandforahearingisnotmadewithin30days,thenoticeofnon- approvalbecomesfinal. (i)Thehearingshallbeheldwithin60daysofthedemandandafteratleasttwoweeks' publishednotice. (ii)ThehearingshallbeconductedinaccordancewithMinn.Stats.§103G.311,subds. 2,6and7. (iii)TheCommissionershalleithercertifyhisapprovalordisapprovaloftheproposed actionwithin30daysofthehearing. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 16 of 42 (F)ShorelandDistrict (1)StatutoryAuthorizationandPolicy (a)STATUTORYAUTHORIZATION:Thisshorelandordinanceisadoptedpursuanttothe authorizationandpoliciescontainedinMinnesotaStatutes,Chapter103F,Minnesota Regulations,Parts6120.2500-6120.3900,andtheplanningandzoningenabling legislationinMinnesotaStatutes,Chapter462. (b)POLICY:TheuncontrolleduseofshorelandsoftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota affectsthepublichealth,safety,andgeneralwelfarenotonlybycontributingtopollution ofpublicwaters,butalsobyimpairingthelocaltaxbase.Therefore,itisinthebest interestsofthepublichealth,safety,andwelfaretoprovideforthewisesubdivision,use anddevelopmentofshorelandsofpublicwaters.ThelegislatureofMinnesotahas delegatedresponsibilitytolocalgovernmentsofthestatetoregulatethesubdivision,use anddevelopmentoftheshorelandsofpublicwatersandthuspreserveandenhancethe qualityofsurfacewaters,conservetheeconomicandnaturalenvironmentalvaluesof shorelands,andprovideforthewiseuseofwatersandrelatedlandresources.This responsibilityisherebyrecognizedbytheCityofMonticello. (2)GeneralProvisions (a)Jurisdiction (i)Theprovisionsofthisordinanceshallapplytotheshorelandsofthepublicwater bodiesasclassifiedinSection3.7(F)(4)ofthisordinance. (ii)Shorelandshallincludealllandwithin1,000feetoftheOrdinaryHighWaterLevel (OHWL)ofalakeand300feetofariveranditsdesignatedfloodplainasdepictedon theCityofMonticello’sOfficialZoningMap. (iii)PursuanttoMinnesotaRegulations,Parts6120.2500-6120.3900,nolake,pond,or flowagelessthan10acresinsizeinmunicipalitiesor25acresinsizein unincorporatedareasneedberegulatedinalocalgovernment’sshoreland regulations.Abodyofwatercreatedbyaprivateuserwheretherewasnoprevious shorelandmay,atthediscretionofthegoverningbody,beexemptfromthis ordinance. (b)Compliance: Theuseofanyshorelandofpublicwaters;thesizeandshapeoflots;theuse,size,type andlocationofstructuresonlots;theinstallationandmaintenanceofwatersupplyand wastetreatmentsystems,thegradingandfillingofanyshorelandarea;thecuttingof shorelandvegetation;andthesubdivisionoflandshallbeinfullcompliancewiththe termsofthisordinanceandotherapplicableregulations. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 17 of 42 (c)Enforcement TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentisresponsiblefortheadministrationand enforcementofthisordinance.Anyviolationoftheprovisionsofthisordinanceor failuretocomplywithanyofitsrequirements(includingviolationsofconditionsand safeguardsestablishedinconnectionwithgrantsofpermits,variancesorconditional uses)shallbesubjecttotheremediesandpenaltiesoutlinedinSection7.6ofthis ordinance. (d)Interpretation Intheirinterpretationandapplication,theprovisionsofthisoverlaydistrictshallbeheld tobeminimumrequirementsandshallbeliberallyconstructedinfavoroftheCityand shallnotbedeemedalimitationorrepealofanyotherpowersgrantedbyStateStatutes. (e)AbrogationandGreaterRestrictions Itisnotintendedbythisordinancetorepeal,abrogate,orimpairanyexistingeasements, covenants,ordeedrestrictions.However,wherethisordinanceimposesgreater restrictions,theprovisionsofthisordinanceshallprevail. (3)Administration (a)PermitsRequired (i)Apermitisrequiredfortheconstructionofbuildingsorbuildingadditions(including butnotlimitedtorelatedactivitiessuchasconstructionofdecksorsigns),the installationand/oralterationofsewagetreatmentsystems,andallgradingandfilling activitiesasrequiredbythisordinance.Applicationforapermitshallbemadetothe CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentpursuanttotheapplicableregulationsin Chapter2ofthisordinance.Theapplicationshallincludethenecessaryinformation sothattheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentcandeterminethesite’ssuitability fortheintendeduseandthatacompliantsewagetreatmentsystemwillbeprovided. (ii)Apermitauthorizinganadditiontoanexistingstructureshallstipulatethatan identifiednonconformingsewagetreatmentsystemshallbereconstructedorreplaced inaccordancewiththeprovisionsofthisordinance. (b)DeterminationofZoningCompliance TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment,inreviewingarequiredpermit,shallmakea determinationastowhethertheproposaliscompliantwithallprovisionsofSection 3.7(F)ShorelandDistrict.Anyuse,arrangement,orconstructionnotauthorizedby permitshallbedeemedaviolationofthisordinanceandshallbepunishableasprovided inSection7.6ofthisordinance. (c)Variances (i)VariancesshallbereviewedundertheprovisionsoutlinedinSection2.4(C)withthe followingadditionalrequirements: ORDINANCENO.545 Page 18 of 42 1.Novarianceshallcircumventthegeneralpurposesandintentoftheshoreland overlaydistrict. 2.Novariancemaybegrantedthatwouldallowanyusethatisprohibitedinthe zoningdistrictinwhichthesubjectpropertyislocated. 3.Thevarianceapplicationmustclearlydemonstratewhetheraconformingsewage treatmentsystemispresentfortheintendeduseoftheproperty.Thevariance,if issued,mustrequirereconstructionofanonconformingsewagetreatmentsystem. (ii)Acopyofthenoticeforthepublichearing(s)toconsideravariancemustbesentto thecommissionerorthecommissioner'sdesignatedrepresentativeandpostmarkedat leasttendaysbeforethehearings. (iii)Acopyofalldecisionsgrantingvariancestoshorelandregulationsshallbe forwardedbymailtotheCommissionerofNaturalResourceswithinten(10)daysof suchaction. (iv)Appealsfromvariancedecisionsonshorelandissuesmaybemadeinaccordance withtheprovisionsofSection2.4(H)andalsoMinnesotaStatutes. (d)ConditionalUses Conditionalusesallowablewithinshorelandareasshallbereviewedundertheprovisions outlinedinSection2.4(D),andinterimusepermitsforusesorstructureswithinshoreland areasshallbereviewedundertheprovisionsoutlinedinSection2.4(E),withthe followingadditionalrequirements: (i)EvaluationCriteria Athoroughevaluationofthewaterbodyandthetopographic,vegetation,andsoils conditionsonthesitemustbemadetoensure: 1.Thepreventionofsoilerosionorotherpossiblepollutionofpublicwaters,both duringandafterconstruction; 2.Thevisibilityofstructuresandotherfacilitiesasviewedfrompublicwatersis limited; 3.Thesiteisadequateforwatersupplyandon-sitesewagetreatment;and 4.Thetypes,uses,andnumbersofwatercraftthattheprojectwillgenerateare compatibleinrelationtothesuitabilityofpublicwaterstosafelyaccommodate thesewatercraft. (ii)Conditionsattachedtoconditionalusepermits TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment,uponconsiderationofthecriterialisted aboveandthepurposesofthisordinance,shallattachsuchconditionstotheissuance oftheconditionalusepermitsasitdeemsnecessarytofulfillthepurposesofthis ordinance.Suchconditionsmayinclude,butarenotlimitedto,thefollowing: 1.Increasedsetbacksfromtheordinaryhighwaterlevel; 2.Limitationsonthenaturalvegetationtoberemovedortherequirementthat additionalvegetationbeplanted;and ORDINANCENO.545 Page 19 of 42 3.Specialprovisionsforthelocation,design,anduseofstructures,sewage treatmentsystems,watercraftlaunchinganddockingareas,andvehicleparking areas. (iii)NotificationProcedures 1.Acopyofthenoticeforthepublichearing(s)toconsideraconditionalusepermit mustbesenttothecommissionerorthecommissioner'sdesignated representativeandpostmarkedatleasttendaysbeforethehearings. 2.Acopyofalldecisionsgrantingaconditionalusepermitsubjecttoshoreland regulationsshallbeforwardedbymailtotheCommissionerofNaturalResources withinten(10)daysofsuchaction. (e)ProposedShorelandDistrictAmendmentsandPUDs (i)NotificationRequired TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentshallsubmittotheCommissionerofthe DepartmentofNaturalResources(orthecommissioner'sdesignatedrepresentative), acopyofanyapplicationforazoningamendmenttoSection3.7(F),oranapplication foraPlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)withintheshorelanddistrictforcertification. ThematerialsshallbesentsoastobereceivedbytheCommissioneratleast30days priortosuchhearingormeetingtoconsidersuchaction.Thenoticeofapplication shallincludeacopyoftheproposedordinancesoramendment,oracopyofthe proposedPlannedUnitDevelopmentalongwithadescriptionoftherequest. (ii)Notificationoffinaldecision TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentshallnotifytheCommissionerofitsfinal decisionontheproposedactionwithintendaysofthedecision. (iii)Effectivedateofdecision TheordinanceamendmentorPUDbecomeseffectiveuponthehappeningofanyof thefollowingevents,whicheverfirstoccurs: 1.Thefinaldecisiontakenbythecityhaspreviouslyreceivedcertificationof approvalfromtheCommissioneroftheDepartmentofNaturalResources. 2.ThecityreceivescertificationofapprovalfromtheCommissionerofthe DepartmentofNaturalResourcesafteritsfinaldecision. 3.ThirtydayshaveelapsedfromthedaytheCommissioneroftheDepartmentof NaturalResourcesreceivednoticeofthefinaldecision,andthecityhasreceived fromtheCommissionerneithercertificationofapprovalnornoticeofnon- approval. 4.TheCommissioneroftheDepartmentofNaturalResourcescertifieshisapproval within30daysafterconductingapublichearing. (iv)Hearingafternon-approval IncasetheCommissioneroftheDepartmentofNaturalResourcesgivesnoticeof non-approvalofanordinanceamendmentorPUD,eithertheapplicantorCommunity ORDINANCENO.545 Page 20 of 42 DevelopmentDepartmentmay,within30daysofsaidnotice,filewiththe Commissionerademandforahearing.Ifthedemandforahearingisnotmade within30days,thenoticeofnon-approvalbecomesfinal. 1.Thehearingshallbeheldwithin60daysofthedemandandafteratleasttwo weeks'publishednotice. 2.ThehearingshallbeconductedinaccordancewithMinn.Stats.§103G.311, subds.2,6and7. 3.TheCommissionershalleithercertifyhisapprovalordisapprovalofthe proposedactionwithin30daysofthehearing. (4)ShorelandClassificationSystemandLandUseDistricts (a)ShorelandClassificationSystem ThepublicwatersoftheCityofMonticellohavebeenclassifiedbelowconsistentwith thecriteriafoundinMinnesotaRegulations,Part6120.3300,andtheProtectedWaters InventoryMapforWrightCounty,Minnesota.TheMississippiRiverisregulatedby Section3.7(E)WildandScenicRecreationalRiverDistrict. (i)Theshorelandareaforthewaterbodieslistedinsubsections(ii)and(iii)belowshall beasdefinedinthisordinanceandasshownontheOfficialZoningMap. (ii)Lakes 1.NaturalEnvironmentLakes a.MudLake(DNRID:86-68P) b.UnnamedWetland(DNRID:86-75W) 2.RecreationalDevelopmentLakes–RESERVED 3.GeneralDevelopmentLakes a.UnnamedWetland(DNRID:86-393W) b.PelicanLake(DNRID:86-31P) c.UnnamedWetland(DNRID:86-67W) d.LongLake(DNRID:86-69P) e.HolkersSlough(DNRID:86-76W) f.UnnamedWetland(DNRID:86-77W) g.SloughLake(DNRID:86-78P) h.UnnamedWetland(DNRID:86-394W) i.UnnamedWetland(DNRID:86-498W) (iii)RiversandStreams 1.RemoteRivers–RESERVED 2.ForestedRivers–RESERVED 3.TransitionRivers–RESERVED ORDINANCENO.545 Page 21 of 42 4.AgriculturalRivers–RESERVED 5.Tributarystreams a.OtterCreek AllprotectedwatercoursesintheCityofMonticelloshownontheProtected WatersInventoryMapforWrightCounty,acopyofwhichisherebyadoptedby reference,thatarenotgivenaclassificationinItems1through6aboveshallbe considered“Tributarystreams.” (b)LandUseDistrictDescriptions (i)CriteriaForDesignation Thelandusedistrictsinsubsection(ii)belowandthedelineationofalanduse district’sboundariesontheOfficialZoningMap,mustbeconsistentwiththegoals, policies,andobjectivesofthecomprehensivelanduseplan. (ii)LandUseinShorelandAreas Landusesonparcelswithintheshorelanddistrictshallberegulatedbythe underlyingzoningdistrictorbyTable3-22below,whicheverismorerestrictive. TABLE3-22:SHORELANDUSESBYLAKECLASSIFICATION (A)LakeClassesinSPECIALPROTECTIONDistricts (withintheWildandScenicRecreationalRiverOverlayDistrict) Uses General Development Recreational Development Natural Environment Forestmanagement P P P Sensitiveresourcemanagement P P P Agricultural:croplandandpasture P P P Agriculturalfeedlots C C C Parksandhistoricsites C C C Extractiveuse C C C Singleresidential C C C Miningofmetallicmineralsandpeat P P P (B)LakeClassesinLOWDENSITYRESIDENTIALDistricts (withintheA-O,R-A,R-1,R-2orT-NDistricts) Uses General Development Recreational Development Natural Environment SingleResidential P P P Semipublic C C C Parksandhistoricsites C C C Extractiveuse C C C Duplex,triplex,quadresidential P P C Forestmanagement P P P Miningofmetallicmineralsandpeat P P P ORDINANCENO.545 Page 22 of 42 TABLE3-22(continued) (C)LakeClassesinHIGHDENSITYRESIDENTIALDistricts (withintheR-3orM-HDistricts) Uses General Development Recreational Development Natural Environment ResidentialPlannedUnitDevelopments(PUDs)C C C SingleResidential P P P SurfaceWaterorientedcommercial(asaccessory toaresidentialPUD)C C C Semipublic C C C Parksandhistoricsites C C C Duplex,triplex,quadresidential P P P Forestmanagement P P P (D)LakeClassesinWATERORIENTEDCOMMERCIALDistricts (withinaBusinessDistrictANDincludesaproposedwaterorienteduse) Uses General Development Recreational Development Natural Environment SurfaceWateroriented commercial P P C CommercialPlannedUnitDevelopment C C C Public,Semipublic C C C Parksandhistoricsites C C C Forestmanagement P P P (E)LakeClassesinGENERALUSEDistricts (withinabusinessorindustrialdistrict) Uses General Development Recreational Development Natural Environment Commercial P P C CommercialPlannedUnitDevelopment C C C Industrial C C N Public,Semipublic P P C ExtractiveUse C C C Parksandhistoricsites C C C Forestmanagement P P P Miningofmetallic mineralsandpeat P P P (P)=PermittedUse,(C)=ConditionalUse,and(N)=ProhibitedUse (5)ShorelandDevelopmentStandards (a)InGeneral (i)Exceptas maybespecificallyprovided,nonewlotshallbecreated—byplatorby metesandboundsdescription—whichdoesnotmeettheminimumdimensional requirementsoutlinedinSection3.7(F)(5). ORDINANCENO.545 Page 23 of 42 (ii)Nolotareashallbesoreducedordiminishedsothattheyardsorotheropenspaces aresmallerthanprescribedherein,norshallthenumberofdwellingunitsbe increasedinanymannerexceptinconformitywiththearearegulationsinthis Ordinance. (iii)Theareaofanylotshallnotbereducedbelowtheminimumstandardsspecified herein. (b)LotStandards Tables3-23,3-24,and3-25listthelotstandardsforlandswithintheshorelanddistrict. (i)StructuresetbacksshallbemeasuredfromtheOrdinaryHighWaterLevel(OHWL); (ii)LotwidthsshallbemetatboththeOHWLandattherequiredstructuralsetbackfrom theOHWL. (iii)LotareashallbecalculatedbasedonlandareaabovetheOHWL. TABLE3-23:SHORELANDLOTSTANDARDSFOR SEWEREDLAKES (A)Residential LotArea (squarefeet) LakeClass LAKESHORE NON-LAKESHORE Single Duplex Triplex Quad Single Duplex Triplex Quad Natural Environment 40,000 70,000 100,000 130,000 20,000 35,000 52,000 65,000 Recreational Development 20,000 35,000 50,000 65,000 15,000 26,000 38,000 49,000 General Development 15,000 26,000 38,000 49,000 10,000 17,500 25,000 32,500 (B)ResidentialLotWidth LakeClass LAKESHORE NON-LAKESHORE Single Duplex Triplex Quad Single Duplex Triplex Quad Natural Environment 125 225 325 425 125 220 315 410 Recreational Development 75 135 195 255 75 135 190 245 General Development 75 135 195 255 75 135 190 245 (C)Setbacks (feet) LakeClass LAKESHORELOTS(distancesinfeet) StructureSetbackfromOHWL ShoreImpactZonefromOHWL Natural Environment 150 75 Recreational Development 75 37.5 General Development 50 25 ORDINANCENO.545 Page 24 of 42 TABLE3-24:SHORELANDLOTSTANDARDSFOR UNSEWEREDLAKES (A)Residential LotArea (squarefeet) LakeClass LAKESHORE NON-LAKESHORE Single Duplex Triplex Quad Single Duplex Triplex Quad Natural Environment 80,000 120,000 160,000 200,000 80,000 160,000 240,000 320,000 Recreational Development 40,000 80,000 120,000 160,000 40,000 80,000 120,000 160,000 General Development 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 40,000 80,000 120,000 160,000 (B)Residential LotWidth LakeClass LAKESHORE NON-LAKESHORE Single Duplex Triplex Quad Single Duplex Triplex Quad Natural Environment 200 300 400 500 200 400 600 800 Recreational Development 150 225 300 375 150 265 375 490 General Development 100 180 260 340 150 265 375 490 (C)Setbacks (feet) LakeClass LAKESHORELOTS(distancesinfeet) StructureSetbackfrom OHWL ShoreImpactZonefrom OHWL On-siteSewageSetback fromOHWL Natural Environment 150 75 150 Recreational Development 100 50 75 General Development 75 37.5 50 ORDINANCENO.545 Page 25 of 42 TABLE3-25:SHORELANDLOTSTANDARDSFOR RIVERS RiverClass Residential LotWidth (ft) Structure Setback Shore Impact Zone Sewage SetbackSingleDuplexTriplexQuad Remote 300 450 600 750 200 100 150 Forested 200 300 400 500 150 75 100 Transition 250 375 500 625 150 75 100 Agricultural 150 225 300 375 50/100*25/50*75 Urban& Tributary 75/100*115/150*150/200*190/250*50/100*25/50*75 *sewered/unsewered (c)Non-residentialDistrictLotStandards (i)Minimumlotstandardsfornon-residentialzonedpropertiesshallbeasdictatedby therequirementsfortheunderlyingzoningdistrictclassification. (ii)Allstructuresandsepticsystemswithinnon-residentialdistrictsshallcomplywith thestructuralsetbackstandardsforsuchfeaturesaslistedinTables3-23,3-24and3- 25. (d)BluffImpactZones Structuresorfacilities,exceptstairwaysandlandings,mustnotbeplacedwithinbluff impactzones. (e)HeightofStructures (i)Nostructures,exceptforchurchesandnon-residentialagriculturalstructures,shall exceedtwenty-five(25)feetinheight. (ii)Detachedaccessorydwellingsshallnotexceedfifteen(15)feetinheight. (f)UsesWithoutWater-OrientedNeeds Useswithoutwater-orientedneedsareencouragedtolocateonlotsorparcelswithout publicwaterfrontage,or,iflocatedonlotsorparcelswithpublicwaterfrontage,must eitherbesetbackdoublethenormalordinaryhighwaterlevelsetbackorbesubstantially screenedfromviewfromthewaterbyvegetationortopography,assumingsummer,leaf- onconditions. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 26 of 42 (6)ZoningandWaterSupply/SanitaryProvisions (a)DesignCriteriaforStructuresintheShorelandDistrict (i)HighWaterElevations Structuresmustbeplacedinaccordancewithanyfloodplainregulationsapplicableto thesite.Wherethesecontrolsdonotexist,theelevationtowhichthelowestfloor, includingbasement,isplacedorflood-proofedmustbedeterminedasfollows: 1.Forlakes,byplacingthelowestflooratalevelatleastthreefeetabovethe highestknownwaterlevel,orthreefeetabovetheordinaryhighwaterlevel, whicheverishigher; 2.Forriversandstreams,byplacingthelowestflooratleastthreefeetabovethe floodofrecord,ifdataareavailable.Ifdataarenotavailable,byplacingthe lowestflooratleastthreefeetabovetheordinaryhighwaterlevel,orby conductingatechnicalevaluationtodetermineeffectsofproposedconstruction uponfloodstagesandfloodflowsandtoestablishafloodprotectionelevation. Underallthreeapproaches,technicalevaluationsmustbedonebyaqualified engineerorhydrologistconsistentwithparts6120.5000to6120.6200governing themanagementoffloodplainareas.Ifmorethanoneapproachisused,the highestfloodprotectionelevationdeterminedmustbeusedforplacingstructures andotherfacilities;and 3.Water-orientedaccessorystructuresmayhavethelowestfloorplacedlowerthan theelevationdeterminedinthisitemifthestructureisconstructedofflood- resistantmaterialstotheelevation,electricalandmechanicalequipmentisplaced abovetheelevationand,iflongdurationfloodingisanticipated,thestructureis builttowithstandiceactionandwind-drivenwavesanddebris. (ii)Water-orientedAccessoryStructures Eachlotmayhaveonewater-orientedaccessorystructurenotmeetingthenormal structuresetbackofthisordinanceifthiswater-orientedaccessorystructurecomplies withthefollowingprovisions: 1.Thestructureorfacilitymustnotexceedtenfeetinheight,exclusiveofsafety rails,andcannotoccupyanareagreaterthan250squarefeet.Detacheddecks mustnotexceedeightfeetabovegradeatanypoint; 2.Thesetbackofthestructureorfacilityfromtheordinaryhighwaterlevelmustbe atleasttenfeet; 3.Thestructureorfacilitymustbetreatedtoreducevisibilityasviewedfrom publicwatersandadjacentshorelandsbyvegetation,topography,increased setbacksorcolor,assumingsummer,leaf-onconditions; 4.Theroofmaybeusedasadeckwithsafetyrails,butmustnotbeenclosedor usedasastoragearea; 5.Thestructureorfacilitymustnotbedesignedorusedforhumanhabitationand mustnotcontainwatersupplyorsewagetreatmentfacilities;and ORDINANCENO.545 Page 27 of 42 6.Asanalternativeforgeneraldevelopmentandrecreationaldevelopment waterbodies,water-orientedaccessorystructuresusedsolelyforwatercraft storage,andincludingstorageofrelatedboatingandwater-orientedsporting equipment,mayoccupyanareaupto400squarefeetprovidedthemaximum widthofthestructureis20feetasmeasuredparalleltotheconfigurationofthe shoreline. (iii)Stairways,Lifts,andLandings Stairwaysandliftsarethepreferredalternativetomajortopographicalterationsfor achievingaccessupanddownbluffsandsteepslopestoshoreareas.Stairwaysand liftsmustmeetthefollowingdesignrequirements: 1.Stairwaysandliftsmustnotexceedfourfeetinwidthonresidentiallots.Wider stairwaysmaybeusedforcommercialproperties,publicopen-spacerecreational properties,andplannedunitdevelopments; 2.Landingsforstairwaysandliftsonresidentiallotsmustnotexceed32squarefeet inarea.Landingslargerthan32squarefeetmaybeusedforcommercial properties,publicopen-spacerecreationalproperties,andplannedunit developments; 3.Canopiesorroofsarenotallowedonstairways,lifts,orlandings; 4.Stairways,lifts,andlandingsmaybeeitherconstructedabovethegroundon postsorpilings,orplacedintotheground,providedtheyaredesignedandbuilt inamannerthatensurescontrolofsoilerosion; 5.Stairways,lifts,andlandingsmustbelocatedinthemostvisuallyinconspicuous portionsoflots,asviewedfromthesurfaceofthepublicwaterassuming summer,leaf-onconditions,wheneverpractical;and 6.Facilitiessuchasramps,lifts,ormobilitypathsforphysicallyhandicapped personsarealsoallowedforachievingaccesstoshoreareas,providedthatthe dimensionalandperformancestandardsofsub-items(1)to(5)arecompliedwith inadditiontotherequirementsofMinnesotaRegulations,Chapter1341. (iv)SignificantHistoricSites Nostructuremaybeplacedonasignificanthistoricsiteinamannerthataffectsthe valuesofthesiteunlessadequateinformationaboutthesitehasbeenremovedand documentedinapublicrepository. (v)SteepSlopes TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentmustevaluatepossiblesoilerosion impactsanddevelopmentvisibilityfrompublicwatersbeforeissuingapermitfor constructionofsewagetreatmentsystems,roads,driveways,structures,orother improvementsonsteepslopes.Whendeterminednecessary,conditionsmustbe attachedtoissuedpermitstopreventerosionandtopreserveexistingvegetation screeningofstructures,vehicles,andotherfacilitiesasviewedfromthesurfaceof publicwaters,assumingsummer,leaf-onvegetation. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 28 of 42 (b)ShorelandAlterations Alterationsofvegetationandtopographywillberegulatedtopreventerosionintopublic waters,fixnutrients,preserveshorelandaesthetics,preservehistoricvalues,preventbank slumping,andprotectfishandwildlifehabitat. (i)VegetationAlterations 1.Vegetationalterationnecessaryfortheconstructionofstructuresandsewage treatmentsystemsandtheconstructionofroadsandparkingareasareexempt fromthevegetationalterationstandardsthatfollow. 2.Removaloralterationofvegetation,exceptforagriculturalandforest managementusesasregulatedinSection3.7(F)(6)(e)(ii)and3.7(F)(6)(e)(iii), respectfully,isallowedsubjecttothefollowingstandards: a.Intensivevegetationclearingwithintheshoreandbluffimpactzonesandon steepslopesisnotallowed.Intensivevegetationclearingforforestland conversiontoanotheruseoutsideoftheseareasisallowableasaconditional useifanerosioncontrolandsedimentationplanisdevelopedandapproved bythesoilandwaterconservationdistrictinwhichthepropertyislocated. b.Inshoreandbluffimpactzonesandonsteepslopes,limitedclearingoftrees andshrubsandcutting,pruning,andtrimmingoftreesisallowedtoprovide aviewtothewaterfromtheprincipaldwellingsiteandtoaccommodatethe placementofstairwaysandlandings,picnicareas,accesspaths,livestock wateringareas,beachandwatercraftaccessareas,andpermittedwater- orientedaccessorystructuresorfacilities,providedthat: i.Thescreeningofstructures,vehicles,orotherfacilitiesasviewedfrom thewater,assumingsummer,leaf-onconditions,isnotsubstantially reduced; ii.Alongrivers,existingshadingofwatersurfacesispreserved;and iii.Theaboveprovisionsarenotapplicabletotheremovaloftrees,limbs,or branchesthataredead,diseased,orposesafetyhazards. (ii)TopographicAlterations/GradingandFilling 1.Gradingandfillingandexcavationsnecessaryfortheconstructionofstructures, sewagetreatmentsystems,anddrivewaysundervalidlyissuedconstruction permitsforthesefacilitiesdonotrequiretheissuanceofaseparategradingand fillingpermit.However,thegradingandfillingstandardsinthisSectionmustbe incorporatedintotheissuanceofpermitsforconstructionofstructures,sewage treatmentsystems,anddriveways. 2.PublicroadsandparkingareasareregulatedbySection3.7(F)(6)(c)ofthis ordinance. 3.Notwithstandingsub-items1.and2.above,agradingandfillingpermitwillbe requiredfor: ORDINANCENO.545 Page 29 of 42 a.Themovementofmorethanten(10)cubicyardsofmaterialonsteepslopes orwithinshoreorbluffimpactzones;and b.Themovementofmorethan50cubicyardsofmaterialoutsideofsteep slopesandshoreandbluffimpactzones. 4.Thefollowingconsiderationsandconditionsmustbeadheredtoduringthe issuanceofconstructionpermits,gradingandfillingpermits,conditionaluse permits,variancesandsubdivisionapprovals: a.Gradingorfillinginanytype2,3,4,5,6,7,or8wetlandmustbeevaluated todeterminehowextensivelytheproposedactivitywouldaffectthe followingfunctionalqualitiesofthewetland: i.Sedimentandpollutanttrappingandretention; ii.Storageofsurfacerunofftopreventorreduceflooddamage; iii.Fishandwildlifehabitat; iv.Recreationaluse; v.Shorelineorbankstabilization;and vi.Noteworthiness,includingspecialqualitiessuchashistoricsignificance, criticalhabitatforendangeredplantsandanimals,orothers. Thisevaluationmustalsoincludeadeterminationofwhetherthewetland alterationbeingproposedrequirespermits,reviews,orapprovalsbyother local,state,orfederalagenciessuchasawatersheddistrict,theMinnesota DepartmentofNaturalResources,ortheUnitedStatesArmyCorpsof Engineers.Theapplicantwillbesoadvised. b.Alterationsmustbedesignedandconductedinamannerthatensuresonly thesmallestamountofbaregroundisexposedfortheshortesttimepossible; c.Mulchesorsimilarmaterialsmustbeused,wherenecessary,fortemporary baresoilcoverage,andapermanentvegetationcovermustbeestablishedas soonaspossible; d.Methodstominimizesoilerosionandtotrapsedimentsbeforetheyreach anysurfacewaterfeaturemustbeused; e.Alteredareasmustbestabilizedtoacceptableerosioncontrolstandards consistentwiththefieldofficetechnicalguidesofthelocalsoilandwater conservationdistrictsandtheUnitedStatesSoilConservationService; f.Fillorexcavatedmaterialmustnotbeplacedinamannerthatcreatesan unstableslope; g.Planstoplacefillorexcavatedmaterialonsteepslopesmustbereviewedby qualifiedprofessionalsforcontinuedslopestabilityandmustnotcreate finishedslopesof30percentorgreater; h.Fillorexcavatedmaterialmustnotbeplacedinbluffimpactzones; ORDINANCENO.545 Page 30 of 42 i.Anyalterationsbelowtheordinaryhighwaterlevelofpublicwatersmust firstbeauthorizedbytheCommissionerofNaturalResourcesunder MinnesotaStatutes,section103G; j.Alterationsoftopographymustonlybeallowediftheyareaccessoryto permittedorconditionalusesanddonotadverselyaffectadjacentornearby properties;and k.Placementofnaturalrockriprap,includingassociatedgradingofthe shorelineandplacementofafilterblanket,ispermittedifthefinishedslope doesnotexceedthreefeethorizontaltoonefootvertical,thelandwardextent oftheriprapiswithintenfeetoftheordinaryhighwaterlevel,andtheheight oftheriprapabovetheordinaryhighwaterleveldoesnotexceedthreefeet. (c)PlacementandDesignofRoads,Driveways,andParkingAreas (i)Publicandprivateroadsandparkingareasmustbedesignedtotakeadvantageof naturalvegetationandtopographytoachievemaximumscreeningfromviewfrom publicwaters.Documentationmustbeprovidedbyaqualifiedindividualthatall roadsandparkingareasaredesignedandconstructedtominimizeandcontrol erosiontopublicwatersconsistentwiththefieldofficetechnicalguidesofthelocal soilandwaterconservationdistrict,orotherapplicabletechnicalmaterials. (ii)Roads,driveways,andparkingareasmustmeetstructuresetbacksandmustnotbe placedwithinbluffandshoreimpactzones,whenotherreasonableandfeasible placementalternativesexist.Ifnoalternativesexist,theymaybeplacedwithinthese areas,andmustbedesignedtominimizeadverseimpacts. (iii)Publicandprivatewatercraftaccessramps,approachroads,andaccess-related parkingareasmaybeplacedwithinshoreimpactzonesprovidedthevegetative screeninganderosioncontrolconditionsofthissubpartaremet.Forprivatefacilities, thegradingandfillingprovisionsofSection3.7(F)(6)(b)(ii)ofthisordinancemustbe met. (d)StormwaterManagement Thefollowinggeneralandspecificstandardsshallapply: (i)GeneralStandards 1.Whenpossible,existingnaturaldrainageways,wetlands,andvegetatedsoil surfacesmustbeusedtoconvey,store,filter,andretainstormwaterrunoffbefore dischargetopublicwaters. 2.Developmentmustbeplannedandconductedinamannerthatwillminimizethe extentofdisturbedareas,runoffvelocities,erosionpotential,andreduceand delayrunoffvolumes.Disturbedareasmustbestabilizedandprotectedassoon aspossibleandfacilitiesormethodsusedtoretainsedimentonthesite. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 31 of 42 3.Whendevelopmentdensity,topographicfeatures,andsoilandvegetation conditionsarenotsufficienttoadequatelyhandlestormwaterrunoffusingnatural featuresandvegetation,varioustypesofconstructedfacilitiessuchasdiversions, settlingbasins,skimmingdevices,dikes,waterways,andpondsmaybeused. Preferencemustbegiventodesignsusingsurfacedrainage,vegetation,and infiltrationratherthanburiedpipesandman-madematerialsandfacilities. (ii)SpecificStandards 1.Impervioussurfacecoverageoflotsmustnotexceed25percentofthelotarea. 2.Whenconstructedfacilitiesareusedforstormwatermanagement,documentation mustbeprovidedbyaqualifiedindividualthattheyaredesignedandinstalled consistentwiththefieldofficetechnicalguideofthelocalsoilandwater conservationdistricts. 3.Newconstructedstormwateroutfallstopublicwatersmustprovideforfiltering orsettlingofsuspendedsolidsandskimmingofsurfacedebrisbeforedischarge. (e)SpecialProvisionsforCommercial,Industrial,Public/Semipublic,Agricultural, ForestryandExtractiveUsesandMiningofMetallicMineralsandPeat (i)StandardsforCommercial,Industrial,Public,andSemipublicUses 1.Surfacewater-orientedcommercialusesandindustrial,public,orsemipublic useswithsimilarneedstohaveaccesstoanduseofpublicwatersmaybelocated onparcelsorlotswithfrontageonpublicwaters.Thoseuseswithwater-oriented needsmustmeetthefollowingstandards: a.Inadditiontomeetingimperviouscoveragelimits,setbacks,andother zoningstandardsinthisordinance,theusesmustbedesignedtoincorporate topographicandvegetativescreeningofparkingareasandstructures; b.Usesthatrequireshort-termwatercraftmooringforpatronsmustcentralize thesefacilitiesanddesignthemtoavoidobstructionsofnavigationandtobe theminimumsizenecessarytomeettheneed;and c.Usesthatdependonpatronsarrivingbywatercraftmayusesignsand lightingtoconveyneededinformationtothepublic,subjecttothefollowing generalstandards: i.Noadvertisingsignsorsupportingfacilitiesforsignsmaybeplacedinor uponpublicwaters.Signsconveyinginformationorsafetymessagesmay beplacedinoronpublicwatersbyapublicauthorityorunderapermit issuedbythecountysheriff; ORDINANCENO.545 Page 32 of 42 ii.Signsmaybeplaced,whennecessary,withintheshoreimpactzoneif theyaredesignedandsizedtobetheminimumnecessarytoconvey neededinformation.Theymustonlyconveythelocationandnameofthe establishmentandthegeneraltypesofgoodsorservicesavailable.The signsmustnotcontainotherdetailedinformationsuchasproductbrands andprices,mustnotbelocatedhigherthantenfeetabovetheground, andmustnotexceedthirty-two(32)squarefeetinsize.Ifilluminatedby artificiallights,thelightsmustbeshieldedordirectedtoprevent illuminationoutacrosspublicwaters;and iii.Otheroutsidelightingmaybelocatedwithintheshoreimpactzoneor overpublicwatersifitisusedprimarilytoilluminatepotentialsafety hazardsandisshieldedorotherwisedirectedtopreventdirect illuminationoutacrosspublicwaters.Thisdoesnotprecludeuseof navigationallights. 2.Useswithoutwater-orientedneedsmustbelocatedonlotsorparcelswithout publicwatersfrontage,or,iflocatedonlotsorparcelswithpublicwaters frontage,musteitherbesetbackdoublethenormalordinaryhighwaterlevel setbackorbesubstantiallyscreenedfromviewfromthewaterbyvegetationor topography,assumingsummer,leaf-onconditions. (ii)AgricultureUseStandards 1.Generalcultivationfarming,grazing,nurseries,horticulture,truckfarming,sod farming,andwildcropharvestingarepermittedusesifsteepslopesandshore andbluffimpactzonesaremaintainedinpermanentvegetationoroperatedunder anapprovedconservationplan(ResourceManagementSystems)consistentwith thefieldofficetechnicalguidesofthelocalsoilandwaterconservationdistricts ortheUnitedStatesSoilConservationService,asprovidedbyaqualified individualoragency.Theshoreimpactzoneforparcelswithpermitted agriculturallandusesisequaltoalineparalleltoand50feetfromtheordinary highwaterlevel. 2.Animalfeedlotsareprohibited. (iii)ForestManagementStandards Theharvestingoftimberandassociatedreforestationorconversionofforesteduseto anon-forestedusemustbeconductedconsistentwiththefollowingstandards: 1.Timberharvestingandassociatedreforestationmustbeconductedconsistent withtheprovisionsoftheMinnesotaNon-pointSourcePollutionAssessment- ForestryandtheprovisionsofWaterQualityinForestManagement"Best ManagementPracticesinMinnesota." 2.Forestlandconversiontoanotheruseshallrequireissuanceofaconditionaluse permitsubjecttoSection2.4(D)andadherencetothefollowingstandards: a.Shoreandbluffimpactzonesmustnotbeintensivelyclearedofvegetation; and ORDINANCENO.545 Page 33 of 42 b.Anerosionandsedimentcontrolplanisdevelopedandapprovedbythelocal soilandwaterconservationdistrictbeforeissuanceofaconditionaluse permitfortheconversion. c.Useoffertilizer,pesticides,oranimalwasteswithinshorelandsmustbedone insuchawayastominimizeimpactontheshoreimpactzoneorpublic waterbyproperapplicationoruseofearthorvegetation. (iv)ExtractiveUseStandards 1.SiteDevelopmentandRestorationPlan.Anextractiveusesitedevelopmentand restorationplanmustbedeveloped,approved,andfollowedoverthecourseof operationofthesite.Theplanmustaddressdust,noise,possiblepollutant discharges,hoursanddurationofoperation,andanticipatedvegetationand topographicalterations.Itmustalsoidentifyactionstobetakenduringoperation tomitigateadverseenvironmentalimpacts,particularlyerosion,andmustclearly explainhowthesitewillberehabilitatedafterextractiveactivitiesend. 2.SetbacksforProcessingMachinery.Processingmachinerymustbelocated consistentwithsetbackstandardsforstructuresfromordinaryhighwaterlevels ofpublicwatersandfrombluffs. (v)MiningofMetallicMineralsandPeat Miningofmetallicmineralsandpeat,asdefinedinMinnesotaStatutes,sections 93.44to93.51,shallbeapermitteduseprovidedtheprovisionsofMinnesota Statutes,sections93.44to93.51,aresatisfied. (f)WaterSupplyandSewageTreatment (i)WaterSupply WatershallbesuppliedthroughtheCityofMonticellomunicipalwatersystem. (ii)SewageTreatment Anypremisesusedforhumanoccupancymustbeprovidedwithanadequatemethod ofsewagetreatment,asfollows: 1.Publicly-ownedsewersystemsshallbeusedforanynewdevelopment. 2.Nonconformingsewagetreatmentsystemsshallberegulatedandupgradedin accordancewiththeprovisionsSection3.7(F)(7)below. (7)Nonconformities Alllegallyestablishednonconformitiesasofthedateofthisordinancemaycontinue,but theywillbemanagedaccordingtoapplicablestatestatutesandtheprovisionsofChapter6of thisordinanceforthesubjectsofalterationsandadditions,repairafterdamage, discontinuanceofuse,andintensificationofuse;exceptthatthefollowingstandardswillalso applyinshorelandareas: ORDINANCENO.545 Page 34 of 42 (a)Constructiononnonconforminglotsofrecord (i)Lotsofrecordintheofficeofthecountyrecorderonthedateofenactmentoflocal shorelandcontrolsthatdonotmeettherequirementsofSection3.7(F)(5)(b)maybe allowedasbuildingsiteswithoutvariancesfromlotsizerequirementsprovidedthe useispermittedinthezoningdistrict,thelothasbeeninseparateownershipfrom abuttinglandsatalltimessinceitbecamesubstandard,wascreatedcompliantwith officialcontrolsineffectatthetime,andsewagetreatmentandsetbackrequirements ofthisordinancearemet. (ii)Avariancefromsetbackrequirementsmustbeobtainedbeforeanyuse,sewage treatmentsystem,orbuildingpermitisissuedforalot.Inevaluatingthevariance,the boardofadjustmentshallconsidersewagetreatmentandwatersupplycapabilitiesor constraintsofthelotandshalldenythevarianceifadequatefacilitiescannotbe provided. (iii)If,inagroupoftwoormorecontiguouslotsunderthesameownership,any individuallotdoesnotmeettherequirementsofSection3.7(F)(5)(b),thelotmustnot beconsideredasaseparateparceloflandforthepurposesofsaleordevelopment. Thelotmustbecombinedwiththeoneormorecontiguouslotssotheyequaloneor moreparcelsofland,eachmeetingtherequirementsofSection3.7(F)(5)(b)asmuch aspossible. (b)Additions/expansionstononconformingstructures (i)Alladditionsorexpansionstotheoutsidedimensionsofanexistingnonconforming structuremustmeetthesetback,height,andotherrequirements of Section3.7(F). Anydeviationfromtheserequirementsmustbeauthorizedbyavariancepursuantto Section3.7(F)(3)(c). (ii)Deckadditionsmaybeallowedwithoutavariancetoastructurenotmeetingthe requiredsetbackfromtheordinaryhighwaterlevelifallofthefollowingcriteriaand standardsaremet: 1.Thestructureexistedonthedatethestructuresetbackswereestablished; 2.Athoroughevaluationofthepropertyandstructurerevealsnoreasonable locationforadeckmeetingorexceedingtheexistingordinaryhighwaterlevel setbackofthestructure; 3.Thedeckencroachmenttowardtheordinaryhighwaterleveldoesnotexceed15 percentoftheexistingsetbackofthestructurefromtheordinaryhighwaterlevel ordoesnotencroachcloserthan30feet,whicheverismorerestrictive;and 4.Thedeckisconstructedprimarilyofwood,andisnotroofedorscreened. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 35 of 42 (8)SpecialProvisionsforSubdivisionandPlattinginShorelandDistricts (a)Landsuitability Eachlotcreatedthroughsubdivision,includingplannedunitdevelopmentsauthorized underSection2.4(P)ofthisordinance,mustbesuitableinitsnaturalstateforthe proposedusewithminimalalteration.Suitabilityanalysisbythelocalunitofgovernment shallconsidersusceptibilitytoflooding,existenceofwetlands,soilandrockformations withseverelimitationsfordevelopment,severeerosionpotential,steeptopography, inadequatewatersupplyorsewagetreatmentcapabilities,near-shoreaquaticconditions unsuitableforwater-basedrecreation,importantfishandwildlifehabitat,presenceof significanthistoricsites,oranyotherfeatureofthenaturallandlikelytobeharmfulto thehealth,safety,orwelfareoffutureresidentsoftheproposedsubdivisionorofthe community. (b)Consistencywithothercontrols Subdivisionsmustconformtoallofficialcontrolsofthiscommunity.Asubdivisionwill notbeapprovedwherealatervariancefromoneormorestandardsinofficialcontrols wouldbeneededtousethelotsfortheirintendedpurpose.Eachlotshallmeetthe minimumlotsizeanddimensionalrequirementsofSection3.7(F)(5),includingatleasta minimumcontiguouslawnarea,thatisfreeoflimitingfactorssufficientforthe constructionoftwostandardsoiltreatmentsystems.Lotsthatwouldrequireuseof holdingtanksmustnotbeapproved. (c)Informationrequirements. Sufficientinformationmustbesubmittedbytheapplicantforthecommunitytomakea determinationoflandsuitability.Theinformationshallincludeatleastthefollowing: (i)Topographiccontoursatten-footintervalsorlessfromUnitedStatesGeological Surveymapsormoreaccuratesources,showinglimitingsitecharacteristics; (ii)ThesurfacewaterfeaturesrequiredinMinnesotaStatutes,section505.02, subdivision1,tobeshownonplats,obtainedfromUnitedStatesGeologicalSurvey quadrangletopographicmapsormoreaccuratesources; (iii)Adequatesoilsinformationtodeterminesuitabilityforbuildingandon-sitesewage treatmentcapabilitiesforeverylotfromthemostcurrentexistingsourcesorfrom fieldinvestigationssuchassoilborings,percolationtests,orothermethods; (iv)Informationregardingadequacyofdomesticwatersupply;extentofanticipated vegetationandtopographicalterations;near-shoreaquaticconditions,including depths,typesofbottomsediments,andaquaticvegetation;andproposedmethodsfor controllingstormwaterrunoffanderosion,bothduringandafterconstruction activities; (v)Locationof100-yearfloodplainareasandfloodwaydistrictsfromexistingadopted mapsordata;and ORDINANCENO.545 Page 36 of 42 (vi)Alineorcontourrepresentingtheordinaryhighwaterlevel,the“toe”andthe“top” ofbluffs,andtheminimumbuildingsetbackdistancesfromthetopofthebluffand thelakeorstream. (d)Dedications Whenalandoreasementdedicationisaconditionofsubdivisionapproval,theapproval mustprovideeasementsovernaturaldrainageorpondingareasformanagementof stormwaterandsignificantwetlands. (e)Platting Allsubdivisionsthatcreatefiveormorelotsorparcelsthatare2-1/2acresorlessinsize shallbeprocessedasaplatinaccordancewithMinnesotaStatutes,Chapter505.No permitforconstructionofbuildingsshallbeissuedforlotscreatedaftertheseofficial controlswereenactedunlessthelotwasapprovedaspartofaformalsubdivision. (f)ControlledAccessorRecreationalLots Lotsintendedascontrolledaccessestopublicwatersorforrecreationaluseareasforuse bynon-riparianlotswithinasubdivisionmustmeetorexceedthesizingcriteriain Section3.7(F)(5)(b)ofthisordinance. (F)(G)FreewayBonusSignDistrict Subsection(1)isherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (2)DistrictApplication TheprovisionsofSection3.7(F)(G)shallapplytoallbusinessandindustriallandswithinthe jurisdictionofMonticellothataredenotedontheofficialzoningmapasbeingwithinthe freewaybonussignoverlaydistrict. Subsection(3)isherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (G)(H)DW:DrinkingWaterSupplyManagementArea RESERVED (H)(I)PerformanceBasedEnhancementDistrict Subsection(1)isherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 37 of 42 (2)DistrictApplication TheprovisionsofSection3.7(H)(I)shallapplytoalllandswithinthejurisdictionof Monticellothataredenotedontheofficialzoningmapasbeingwithintheperformancebased enhancementoverlaydistrict. Subsection(3),(3)(a),and3(a)subsections(i)and(ii)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedherein unchanged. (iii)LotStandards 1.Minimumlotsizeshallbeequivalenttotherequiredsquarefeetperunit followingexecutionofallpermitteddensityadjustmentsoutlinedinSection 3.7(H)(I)(4). 2.Minimumlotwidthshallbebasedontherequiredminimumlotsizeperthe followingtable: TABLE 3-23 3-26:REQUIREDMINIMUMBASELOTWIDTHSFOR PERFORMANCERESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT Thecontentsofthetableareherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged Subsection(3)(a)(iv)isherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. Subsection(3)(b)anditssubsection(i)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (ii)AllowedResidentialDensity 1.Exclusivelyresidentialdevelopmentproposalsonpropertieswithanunderlying zoningdistrictofR-3shallbegovernedbythebasedensityregulationsforthe underlyingzoningdistrict. 2.Thebasedensityofresidentialunitswithinaperformancebasedmixed-use developmentshallbe4200squarefeetofgrosslotareaperunitregardlessofthe underlyingzoningdistrict. 3.Adjustmentstotheallowedbasedensityshallbepermittedinaccordancewith theprovisionsofSection3.7(H)(I)(4),butinnocaseshalltheresidentialdensity exceedtwenty(20)unitsperacre. (iii)Lotstandardsingeneral 1.Lotstandardsandsetbacksshallbegovernedbytheregulationsforthe underlyingzoningdistrict. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 38 of 42 2.Developmentwhichcombinesresidentialandbusinessusesshallconformtothe mixedusestandardsoftheperformancedistrictasoutlinedinSection3.7(H)(I) (5). (4)Densitybonusesforimprovedresidentialdevelopment Basedensitysquarefootagerequirementsforresidentialdevelopmentwithinaperformance basedenhancementdistrictmaybereducedbasedoninclusionofthefollowingdevelopment featuresandthecorrespondingsquarefootreductionfactors.Undernocircumstancesshall theresultingdensityexceedtheestablishedmaximumdensityestablishedbythisordinance. (a)Bonusesforallhousingtypes: (i)PreservationofNaturalFeatures –thebasedensityrequirementmaybereduced basedontheamountoflandbeingpermanentlysetasideforthepreservationof naturalfeaturesasoutlinedinTable3-24 3-27: TABLE 3-24 3-27:PRESERVATIONOFNATURAL FEATURESDENSITYBONUS Thecontentsofthetableareherebyrestatedandincorporated hereinunchanged (ii)AdditionalLandscaping –thebasedensityrequirementmaybereducedbasedon theintroductionofadditionallandscapingbeyondthenormalrequirementsofcodeas outlinedinTable3-25 3-28: TABLE 3-25 3-28:DENSITYBONUSESFORADDITIONALLANDSCAPING Thecontentsofthetableareherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged (iii)AdditionalUseableRecreationalSpace –inconjunctionwithdevelopment requiringparkdedication,thebasedensityrequirementmaybereducedbasedonany additionalamountoflandacceptedbytheCityforpublicrecreationpurposesover thatwhichisnormallyrequiredbycodeasoutlinedinTable3-26 3-29: TABLE 3-26 3-29:RECREATIONALSPACE DENSITYBONUS Thecontentsofthetableareherebyrestatedandincorporated hereinunchanged Subsection3.7(H)(4)(b)isherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 39 of 42 (5)BonusesforGreenBuildings (a)TheincentiveslistedinTable3-27 3-30 areavailabletodevelopmentsincorporatingthe denotednumberofgreenbuildingfeaturesfromschedules“A”and“B”inTable3-28 3- 31. TABLE 3-27 3-30:BONUSESFORGREENBUILDINGS Thecontentsofthetableareherebyrestated andincorporatedhereinunchanged (b)ThegreenbuildingfeatureslistedinTable3-28 3-31 belowmaybeutilizedtoobtainthe developmentbonuseslistedinTable3-27 3-30. TABLE 3-28 3-31:GREENBUILDINGSFEATURES Thecontentsofthetableareherebyrestated andincorporatedhereinunchanged Subsection3.7(H)(6)isherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (I)(J)CCDResidentialOverlayDistrict Subsection(1)isherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (2)DistrictApplication TheprovisionsofSection3.7(I)(J)shallapplytoalllandswithinthejurisdictionof MonticellothataredenotedontheofficialCCDResidentialOverlayDistrictmap. Subsections(3)and(4)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (J)(K)SpecialUseOverlayDistrict Subsections(1)and(2)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 40 of 42 Section4.Table5-1:UsesbyDistrictisherebyamendedasfollows: TABLE 5-1:USESBYDISTRICT Allagricultural,residential,civicandinstitutional,andofficeusesarehereby restatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged CommercialUses AdultUses P P 3.7(J)(K) Allcommercialusesfrom“AuctionHouse”to“WholesaleSales”arehereby restatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged Allindustrialusesareherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged Section5.Section8.4–Definitionsisherebyamendedtoaddoramendthe followingdefinitionsinalphabeticalorder: BOATHOUSE:Astructuredesignedandusedsolelyforthestorageofboatsorboatingequipment. LAKE,GENERALDEVELOPMENT:Lakesthatusuallyhavemorethan225acresofwaterpermileof shorelineand25dwellingspermileofshoreline,andaremorethan15feetdeep. LAKE,NATURALENVIRONMENT:Lakesthatusuallyhavelessthan150totalacres,lessthan60 acrespermileofshoreline,andlessthanthreedwellingspermileofshoreline.Theymayhavesome winterkilloffish;mayhaveshallow,swampyshoreline;andarelessthan15feetdeep. LAKE,RECREATIONALDEVELOPMENT:Lakesthatusuallyhavebetween60and225acresof waterpermileofshoreline,between3and25dwellingspermileofshoreline,andaremorethan15feet deep. RIVER,AGRICULTURAL:Riversthatrunthroughintensivelycultivatedareas,mainlyinthesouthern andwesternareaofMinnesota. RIVER,FORESTED:Riversthatareinforested,sparselytomoderatelypopulatedareaswithsome roads;typicallyfoundinnortheast,southwestandnorth-centralMinnesota RIVER,REMOTE:Riversthatareprimarilyinroadless,forested,sparselypopulatedareasin northeasternMinnesota. RIVER,TRANSITION:Riversthatareinamixtureofcultivated,pastureandforestlands. RIVER,TRIBUTARY:RiversintheProtectedPublicWatersInventorythatarenotclassifiedbythe DNRasanagricultural,forested,remoteortransitionriver. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 41 of 42 SETBACK:Thehorizontaldistancebetweenastructureandthelotlinesofthelotonwhichitislocated; ortheminimumhorizontaldistancebetweenastructure,sewagetreatmentsystemorotherfacilityandan ordinaryhighwaterlevel,sewagetreatmentsystem,topofabluff,road,highway,propertyline,orother facility. SEWAGETREATMENTSYSTEM:aseptictankandsoilabsorptionsystemorotherindividualor clustertypesewagetreatmentsystemasdescribedandregulatedinMinnesotaRulesChapter7080. SHOREIMPACTZONE:Landlocatedbetweentheordinaryhighwaterlevelofapublicwateranda lineparalleltoitatasetbackof50percentoftherequiredstructuresetback. SHORELAND: Subsection(A)isherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (B)Threehundred(300)feetfromariverorstream,orthelandwardextentofafloodplaindesignated byordinanceonsuchriverorstream,whicheverisgreater.Thelimitsofshorelandsmaybe reducedwheneverthewatersinvolvedareboundedbytopographicdividesthatextendlandward fromthewatersforlesserdistancesandwhenapprovedbytheCommissionerofNaturalResources. (C)TheareaincludedintherecreationallandusedistrictsfortheMississippiRiverasdefinedin MinnesotaRegulationsNR2400-2420 MinnesotaRulesChapter6105.0800-0950. SURFACEWATER-ORIENTEDCOMMERCIALUSE:Theuseoflandforcommercialpurposes, whereaccesstoanduseofasurfacewaterfeatureisanintegralpartofthenormalconductanceof business.Marinas,resortsandrestaurantswithtransientdockingfacilitiesareexamplesofsuchuse. TOEOFBLUFF:Thelowerpointofa50-footsegmentwithanaverageslopeexceeding18 percent. TOPOFBLUFF:Thehigherpointofa50-footsegmentwithanaverageslopeexceeding18 percent. WETLAND Subsections(A)and(B)areherebyrestatedandincorporatedhereinunchanged. (C)Wetlandsdoes do notincludepublicwaterswetlandsandpublicwatersunlessreclassifiedas wetlandsbytheCommissionerofNaturalResourcesunderMinnesotaStatutes,section103G.201. ORDINANCENO.545 Page 42 of 42 Section5.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassage andpublication.RevisionswillbemadeonlineafteradoptionbyCouncil. CopiesofthecompleteZoningOrdinanceareavailableonlineandat MonticelloCityHall. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis9thdayofApril,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ____________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: SUMMARYORDINANCENO.545A CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ASUMMARYORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10,SECTION3.7OFTHE MONTICELLOZONINGCODERELATINGTOOVERLAYDISTRICTS, ADDINGREGULATIONSFORTHESHORELANDDISTRICTANDTHE WILDANDSCENICRECREATIONALRIVERDISTRICT, ANDREPEALINGCHAPTER27OFTHEMONTICELLOZONINGCODE NOTICEISHEREBYGIVEN that,onApril9,2012,OrdinanceNo.545wasadopted bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota.Duetothelengthynatureof OrdinanceNo.545,thefollowingSummaryOrdinanceNo.545Ahasbeenpreparedfor publicationasauthorizedbystatelaw. TheordinanceadoptedbytheCouncilrepealsChapter27oftheMonticelloZoningCode whichregulatedtheManagementoftheMississippiWild,Scenic,andRecreationalRiver SystemandtheShorelandareasoftheCityofMonticello. TheordinanceadoptedbytheCouncilamendsTitle10,Section3.7oftheMonticello ZoningCode.ThegeneralpurposeoftheordinanceamendmentistoaddnewOverlayZoning RegulationsfortheShorelandDistrictandtheWildandScenicRecreationalRiverDistrictwith changesinthefollowingsections: Table3-14:CCDDevelopmentStandards Section3.7(D):WetlandDistrict Section3.7(E):WildandScenicRecreationalRiverDistrict(new) Section3.7(F):ShorelandDistrict(new) Section3.7(G):FreewayBonusSignDistrict Section3.7(H):DW:DrinkingWaterSupplyManagementArea Section3.7(I):PerformanceBasedEnhancementDistrict Section3.7(J):CCDResidentialOverlayDistrict Section3.7(K):SpecialUseOverlayDistrict Table5-1:UsesbyDistrict Section8.4:Definitions Aprintedcopyofthewholeordinanceisavailableforinspectionbyanypersonduring theCity’sregularofficehours.ThecompleteordinancewillbepostedontheCity’swebsite followingpublication. SUMMARYORDINANCENO.545A APPROVEDFORPUBLICATION bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota, this9th dayofApril,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: JeffO’NeillCityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: MONTICELLOPLANNINGCOMMISSION CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2012–022 Date:April3rd,2012ResolutionNo.2012-022 MotionBy:_____________________SecondedBy:________________________ ARESOLUTIONBYTHEMONTICELLOPLANNINGCOMMISSION RECOMMENDINGAPPROVALOFANAMENDMENTTOTITLE10,MONTICELLO ZONINGORDINANCE,CHAPTER3,SECTION7FORTHEADOPTIONOF OVERLAYORDINANCESREGULATINGTHEMISSISSIPPIWILD,SCENIC& RECREATIONALRIVERDISTRICTANDTHESHORELANDDISTRICT,AND CHAPTER8,DEFINITIONS,ANDRECOMMENDINGTHEREPEALOFCHAPTER 27REGULATINGTHEMANAGEMENTOFTHEMISSISSIPPIWILD,SCENIC,AND RECREATIONALRIVERSYSTEMANDTHESHORELANDAREASOFTHECITY OFMONTICELLO. WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellohasrequestedanAmendmenttoCityCodeTitle10, MonticelloZoningOrdinance,Chapter3,Section7fortheadoptionofoverlayordinances regulatingtheMississippiWild,Scenic&RecreationalRiverDistrictandtheShorelandDistrict, andChapter8,Definitions;and WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonFebruary21st,andMarch6 th, 2012ontherequestandmembersofthepublicwereprovidedtheopportunitytopresent informationtothePlanningCommission;and WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionhasconsideredallofthecommentsandthestaffreport, whichareincorporatedbyreferenceintotheresolution;and WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionoftheCityofMonticellomakesthefollowingFindings ofFactinrelationtotherecommendationofapproval: TheuncontrolleduseofshorelandsoftheCityofMonticello,Minnesotaaffectsthe publichealth,safety,andgeneralwelfarenotonlybycontributingtopollutionofpublic waters,butalsobyimpairingthelocaltaxbase.Therefore,itisinthebestinterestsofthe publichealth,safety,andwelfaretoprovideforthewisesubdivision,useand developmentofshorelandsofpublicwaters. ThelegislatureofMinnesotahasdelegatedresponsibilitytolocalgovernmentsofthe statetoregulatethesubdivision,useanddevelopmentoftheshorelandsofpublicwaters andthuspreserveandenhancethequalityofsurfacewaters,conservetheeconomicand naturalenvironmentalvaluesofshorelands,andprovideforthewiseuseofwatersand relatedlandresources. TheShorelandDistrictordinanceprovidesfortheorderlydevelopmentoftheshoreland andprotectslakesandriversfrompollutionbyindividualsewagetreatmentsystemsand othernon-pointsources. TheShorelandDistrictordinanceencouragesdevelopmentofshorelandstoenhance waterqualityandpreservescenicresources. InordertopreserveandprotecttheMississippiRiveranditsadjacentlandwhichpossess scenic,recreational,naturalandhistoricalvalues,theMississippiRiverintheCityof Monticellohasbeengivenarecreationalriverclassification,andlandsadjacenttothe riverareherebydesignatedbylandusedistricts,theboundariesofwhicharebasedupon theMississippiRiverManagementPlan. ThepurposeoftheMississippiWild,Scenic&RecreationalRiverDistrictistoprotect andpreservethescenic,recreational,naturalandhistoricalvaluesoftheMississippi Riverinthecitybycarefullycontrollingdevelopmentofthisrivercorridorconsistent withthestateWildandScenicRiverAct TheMississippiWild,Scenic&RecreationalRiverDistrictordinancewillserveto preventdamagetotheseexceptionalriverscausedbyintensivedevelopmentand recreationaloveruse. NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,bythePlanningCommissionoftheCityof Monticello,Minnesota: 1.PursuanttoMinn.Stat.§462.357,theapplicationforAmendmenttoMonticelloZoning OrdinanceChapter3,Section7fortheadoptionofOverlayOrdinancesregulatingthe MississippiWild,Scenic&RecreationalRiverDistrictandtheShorelandDistrict,and Chapter8,Section4,Definitions isherebyrecommendedtotheCityCouncilfor approval. ADOPTED this3rddayofApril,bythePlanningCommissionoftheCityofMonticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLOPLANNINGCOMMISSION By:_______________________________ RodDragsten,Chair ATTEST: _____________________________________ AngelaSchumann,CommunityDevelopmentDirector City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 1 9.PublicHearing-ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-029accepting FeasibilityReportandauthorizingPreparationofPlansandSpecificationsfor2012 RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001 (BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: OnFebruary13,2012,CouncilauthorizedthepreparationoftheattachedFeasibility ReportforCityProjectNo.12C001,whichproposestorehabilitateand/orimprovethe pavementsectionsonthreeruralroadsegmentslocatedinthesoutheastquadrantofthe Citytotalingapproximately12,400feetinlength,or2.35miles.Thethreeruralroad segmentsinclude: EdmonsonAvenue-ChelseaRoadtosouthCitylimits(approx.6,000linearfeet) FallonAvenue-SchoolBoulevardtoHuntersCrossing(approx.2,800linearfeet) FenningAvenue-SchoolBoulevardto85th StreetNE(approx.3,600linearfeet) Mapsshowingthescopeofthethreeprojectareasareincludedas Figures1,2and3 in thesupportingdata. PavementSectionEvaluations Thepavementsectionsofthesethreeruralroadsegmentshavedeterioratedtovarying degreesovertheyearsandthereforeneedtobeimprovedtovaryingdegreestoextend theirusefullives.Overall,theratingsindicatethattheseruralroadsegmentsshould receivesometypeofpavementrehabilitationimprovementtoextendtheirusefullives. Staffrecentlyratedthepavementsectionsforthesethreeruralroadsegmentsand assignedaPavementConditionIndex(PCI)toeachsegmentusingourPavement ManagementProgram(PMP),whichismanagedin-housebystafffromtheEngineering andStreetDepartments.PCI’sareanumericalindexbetween0and100thatindicatethe conditionofapavementbasedonthevariouspavementdistressesrecordedduringvisual observations.APCIvalueof100representsapavementinbrandnewcondition,whilea PCIvalueof0representsapavementsectionthathasfallenintototaldisrepairrequiring acompletereconstruction. ThePMPevaluationprocessinvolvesdividingthepavementsurfaceintosections.The type,extentandseverityofthevariouspavementdistressesnotedwithineachsectionare thenrecorded.Numeroustypesofpavementdistressesmayexistwithinapavement sectionincluding,butnotlimitedto,alligatorcracking,blockcracking,longitudinal cracking,transversecracking,rutting,raveling,shoving,potholesandpatches.Eachtype ofdistressobservedreceivesaratingoflow,mediumorhighseveritybasedontheextent ofthedistressnoted. OncestaffgathersthefielddataitisthenprocessedusingCarteGraphPMPsoftware, whichcalculatesanaveragePCIratingforeachsegmentanalyzed.ThisPCIvalueis usedbystafftodeterminethemostcost-effectivepavementrehabilitationmethodfor eachroadsegment.Thethreeruralroadsproposedforimprovementsin2012allhave City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 2 PCIratingsbetween6.34and64.31asshownbelowin Table1.Figure4 ofthe supportingdataalsoincludesthesePCIratings,alongwithotherinformationonthe existingpavementincludingtheyearitwasoriginallyconstructedandroutine maintenanceinformation. TABLE1 ProposedImprovements–Edmonson,FallonandFenningAvenues StreetNameFromTo 2011 P C I RehabilitationMethod Proposed EdmonsonAveChelseaRdDundasRd32.5Reclaim(1)orUrbanRecon(2) EdmonsonAveDundasRdFarmsteadDr14.6 Reclaim(1)orUrbanRecon(2) EdmonsonAveFarmsteadDrSchoolBlvd6.34 Reclaim(1)orUrbanRecon(2) EdmonsonAveSchoolBlvd89th St18.23 Reclaim(1)orUrbanRecon(2) EdmonsonAve89th St87th St44.34 Reclaim(1)orUrbanRecon(2) EdmonsonAve87th StCityLimits64.31 Reclaim(1)orUrbanRecon(2) FallonAveSchoolBlvdStarlingDr25.3Reclaim(1)orOverlay(2) FallonAveStarlingDrFallonDr24.73 Reclaim(1)orOverlay(2) FallonAveFallonDr85th St35.95 Reclaim(1)orOverlay(2) FallonAve85th StFarmsteadAve26.1 Reclaim(1)orOverlay(2) FallonAveFarmsteadAvePowerlines43.85 Reclaim(1)orOverlay(2) FallonAvePowerlines87th St78.62NoImprovementsProposed FallonAve87th St90-degreeturn78.62NoImprovementsProposed FenningAveSchoolBlvdSpiritHillsRd62.36Overlay FenningAveSpiritHillsRd86th St46.66Overlay FenningAve86th St85th St60.83Overlay ThePavementConditionIndex(PCI),whichisbasedonthephysicalconditionofthe roadsisobtainedfromafieldinspectionofeverysquareyardofroadsurfacemeasuring boththequantityandthetype(severity)ofdistressesinthepavement.Someexamplesof typicalpavementdistressesthatarefoundintheseroadsincludetransverseand longitudinalcracking,blockcracking,andalligatorcracking.Representativepicturesof thesetypesofpavementdistressesareshownbelow. City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 3 LongitudinalcrackingBlockCrackingAlligatorCracking ThecalculationofthePCIvalueforanindividualroadtakesintoaccountthetotalareaof distressesencounteredandtheseverityofthedistresses. PCIRangeRoadCharacteristics Maintenance Method AdditionalItems OftenRepaired 70-100 Lowtomediumseverity potholes,frost cracking,medium severitytransverse cracking,aggregate polishing,lowseverity raveling RoutineMaintenance/ CrackSeal/ Sealcoat Spotpatching,gatevalve adjustments 36-69 Lowtomediumseverity longitudinaland transversecracking, lowandmoderate severityedgeandcurb crackingandspalling, lowtomediumseverity blockcracking, mediumseverity raveling Patch/Repair/ Resurface/ Overlay Raisemanholecastings,adjust gatevalves,repairor replacecrackedor spalledcurb,repairor replacecatchbasin castings 0-35 Mediumtohighseverity longitudinaland transversecracking, mediumtohigh severityreflective cracking,alligator cracking,mediumto highseveritypotholes, highseverityedgeand curbcrackingand spalling,rutting, excessiveskin patching,highseverity raveling,mediumto highseverityfrost heaving ReclaimandRecycle/ Reconstruct/Upgrade Replaceorinstallsanitary sewer,replaceor installstormsewer, replaceorinstallwater main,replaceutility castings,adjustroad gradeandalignment, replaceorinstallcurb andgutter Eachofthesemaintenancestrategieshasitsownlifecycle,aswellasitspartin extendingthelifeoftheoverallpavementsection. City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 4 RoadswithPCIratingsfrom0to35indicatethepresenceofseveraldistressesinthe pavementanditisdifficulttoquantifytheamountofdistressesgiventhatthereareso many.Asaresult,comparingtheratingsinthisrange,forexamplewhetheritisa2ora 20,doesnotresultinasignificantchangeinthetypeofmaintenancemethodforthese roadsormaketheroadwiththehigherPCIratinginbetterconditionthantheroadwith thelowerPCIrating.ItisthereforerecommendedthatroadswithaPCIbelow35be reconstructedforthesereasons.EdmonsonAvenueandFallonAvenueareboth exhibitingsignificantpavementdistressesinthisrange. Fortheruralroadsegmentsidentifiedforimprovementsin2012,thisreportexploresthe useofthefollowingthreerehabilitationmethodsasidentifiedabovein Table1. Overlay -ThistreatmentmethodisproposedforFenningAvenue.Itcouldalsobe usedonFallonAvenue,butstaffwouldnotrecommenddoingsounlessresidential developmentappearstobeimminentwithinthenext5to10years,therebydriving theneedtoconstructthedeepsanitarysewerextensionunderFallonAvenuetothe south.Thismethodinvolvesmilling1½“bituminouspavementoffthetopofthe existingpavementalongallsawcuts,cleaningtheexistingpavement,thenoverlaying theexistingpavementwitha1½”matofnewbituminous.Thistreatmentwill typicallyextendtheusefullifeofapavementfrom5to10ormoreyears,depending ontheconditionoftheexistingpavementandtheextentofexistingcracking.Some oftheexistingcrackswilltypicallyreflectthroughanewpavementoverlaythefirst yearfollowingtheoverlay,andtheremainderofthecrackswillreflectthroughthe overlayinincreasingproportionswitheachpassingyear.Thiswillrequireincreasing crackfillingoperations,andasealcoatwillusuallybeappliedafter5yearsorso. Reclamation -ThistreatmentmethodisproposedtobeusedonFallonAvenueand EdmonsonAvenueandinvolvesreclaimingtheexistingpavementsection,including theasphaltpavementandasmallportionoftheaggregatebasesection.Thisis accomplishedusingamillwhichgrindsthepavement,whichisthenmixedand appliedovertheremainingaggregatebaseasanewrecycledaggregatebasecourse. Thisreclaimedbasecourseisthencompactedbeforeitreceivesanew4”asphalt pavementsurface.Theresultisathicker,strongerpavementsection,withthesurface oftheroadbeingseveralincheshigherthanitoriginallywas.Thismethodisusually morecost-effectivethanacompletereconstructionsinceexistingpavementsection doesnothavetobehauledoffthesiteanddisposedof. Reconstruction(urban)-ThistreatmentmethodcouldbeusedonEdmonsonAvenue ifanurbansectionwouldbepreferredoveraruralsectionatthistime.Thisoption, whichwouldbeabout3timesthecostofpavementreclamation,wouldonlyhave meritifitisthoughtthatdevelopmentoftheadjacentnon-residentialparcelsis imminentwithinthenext10to20yearsorso.Thisoptioninvolvesremovingthe existingpavementsectionandsomeoftheexistingsubgradetolowertheroadway elevationabout1foot,thenconstructinganewpavementsectionwith6”aggregate baseand4”bituminouspavement,alongwithcurbandgutterandstormsewer.It City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 5 shouldbenotedthattheexistingasphaltpavementcouldbereclaimedandreapplied inplaceofnewaggregatebaseclass5asapotentialcostsavingmethod.Thiscould bebidasanalternatebidtoseewhatthecostsavingswouldbe,ifany. TomWood,ResearchProjectSupervisorwiththeMn/DOTOfficeofMaterialsandRoad Research,assistedCitystaffinevaluatingthepavementconditionsofthethreeroad segmentsaddressedintheFeasibilityReport.Basedonhisobservations,Mr.Wood recommendedthattheCitycompletepavementreclamationprojectsonbothEdmonson AvenueandFallonAvenue,andthatweeitherreclaimandrepaveFenningAvenueor completea“TexasUnderseal”onit,whichisanewtreatmentMn/DOTrecentlytriedon asegmentofHighway101.However,Mn/DOTisstillevaluatingtheresultsofthat treatmentsostaffdoesnotrecommendtryingthistreatmentatthistime. WSBcompletedfifteen(15)pavementcoringsandfourteen(14)soilboringsonMarch 16th alongthethreeruralroadsegmentstodeterminetheexistingpavementsection conditionsandthicknesses,andtosamplethesubgradematerialsatvariouslocations alongeachroadsegment.Eight(8)coringsandboringsweretakenalongEdmonson Avenue,four(4)coringsandthree(3)boringsweretakenalongFallonAvenue,and anotherthree(3)coringsandboringsweretakenalongFenningAvenue.This informationisimportantwhendeterminingpavementrehabilitationtreatmentoptionsas reclaimmachineneedstocutdeepenoughtocoolthecuttingteethintheupperinchor twooftheaggregatebase,andthecompositionofthesubgradesoilsiscrucialtoensuring propersubgradestability.Itshouldbenotedthatnoneofthecorings,whichwere3-feet indepth,encounteredgroundwater.Assuch,itisassumedthatdewateringshouldnotbe anissueduringconstruction. Thesoilboringsgenerallyindicatedthattheexistingroadsubgradesoilsconsistofsilty andclayeysandsoils,andarethereforesuitablesubgradesoilsforroadconstructionand forthesupportandbeddingofutilities.However,whensiltyandclayeysandsoilsareat orabovetheiroptimummoisturecontentstheywillbeunstableandwillrequirefarming anddrying,oralternativelyasubcutcouldbecompletedwiththesoilbeingreplacedwith compactedselectgranularmaterial. OnEdmonsonAvenue,thepavementcoresindicatethisisacandidateforpavement reclamation.Thepavementislosingitsintegrityandshowingsignsofstripping.The pavementappearstobetoothintocompleteamillandoverlayandcouldbeadversely impactedbyconstructionoperations.Basedontheamountofcrackingpresentonthe roadway,ifamillandoverlayorjustabituminousoverlaywascompleted,thecrackswill resurfaceandwillnotprovideanaestheticallypleasingsurface.Thecrackswouldneedtobe maintainedovertimeaswell,whichcouldbemorecostlythanifreclamationwascompleted. Ifjustanoverlayiscompleted,additionalcostsforshouldering,matchinginto driveways/crosswouldneedtobetakenintoaccountaswell. FallonAvenuehasalargeamountofdeepcrackingandotherseveredistressesinthe pavementwhichindicateitisacandidateforpavementreclamation.Thepavementcores indicatethatthepavementappearstobeintactingeneral;howevertherearesomesignsof strippingstartingtoshow.A1½"millandoverlaycouldbecompletedontheroadwayifthe City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 6 futuredeeptrunksanitarysewerlineneededtobeextendedtothesouthundertheroadway withinthenext10yearsorless,makingthistheleastexpensiveoption.However,theexisting deepcrackswouldsoonresurfaceandtheresultsofareclamationandcontinuedmaintenance wouldprovideamoreaestheticallypleasingandbetterdrivingsurfacefor20yearsormore. OnFenningAvenue,thepavementcoresindicatethisisacandidatefora1½"overlay.The pavementisgenerallysoundandhasnoapparentsignsofstripping.Thereappearstobean adequatedepthofpavementfortheamountandtypeoftrafficcurrentlyontheroadway. Millingwouldbeneededatallsawcutlocationstomatchintojointsatdriveways,cross streets,etc. WSBandAssociates PavementCoringandBoringsForensicReport isattachedin AppendixD. TherecommendationsofbothTomWoodandWSBandAssociateswereconsideredto determinethebeststrategiesforrehabilitatingthepavementsectionsofthethreerural roadsegments. EdmonsonAvenueProposedImprovements EdmonsonAvenueiscurrentlyaruralroadwithpavementwidthsvaryingbetween22 and24feetbetweenChelseaRoadandthesouthCitylimits.Existing(2008)traffic countsrangefrom1,150to2,250ADT.Projected(2030)ADT’sare4,600. Thefeasibilityreportexaminestwoalternativepavementrehabilitationoptionsfor EdmonsonAvenue. EdmonsonAvenue–Option#1(RuralSectionReclaim&4”Repave@5,850lf) Leaveasaruralroadbyreclaimingtheexistingbituminouspavementsectionfromabout 260-feetsouthofChelseaRoadtothesouthCitylimits.Thiswouldinvolvegrindingthe pavementsection,placingitovertheexistingaggregatebaseandcompactingit,then placinganew4”bituminouspavementsurfaceoverthereclaimedmaterial.Itis proposedtowidenthepavementonEdmonsonto24-feet,andtoconstruct2-foot aggregateshoulderstobetteraccommodatetraffic,especiallysinceitisahigh-speedroad withsignificanttrafficvolumes.Thiswouldrequiretheroadtobeloweredaboutone- halfofafoottoavoidtheneedtore-gradethein-slopes.Allexistingdrainageculverts wouldbecleanedandreusedwhereverpractical.Insummary: Reclaimexistingpavementsection&repavew/4”bituminouspavement Construct12’lanesw/2’aggregateshoulders=28’totalwidth(currently23’) Someminorgradingofin-slopeswillberequired Minorturfrestorationwillberequired AddtwoINTERSECTIONAHEADsignsforDundasRoad EdmonsonAvenue–Option#2(UrbanSectionReconstruct@6,236lf) ReconstructtheroadasanurbansectionbetweenChelseaRoadandthesouthCitylimits byreclaimingtheexistingbituminouspavementsection,loweringtheroadapproximately City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 7 1foot,andconstructinga44-footwideurbanroadwaywithcurbandgutterandstorm sewer.Thereclaimedmaterialwouldbeusedasthenewbaseforthenewpavement surfacetoreducecosts.Insummary: Reconstructas44-footwideurbansection Constructtwo14’throughlanesw/16’centertwo-wayturnlane Fillingofditcheswillberequired Turfrestorationwillberequired AddtwoINTERSECTIONAHEADsignsforDundasRoad Option#1wouldbetheleastexpensiveandwouldminimizeconstructiontimeand impactstoarearesidentsandbusinessesduringconstruction. Option#2wouldbemuchmorecostlyandwouldincreasetheconstructiontimeand impactstoarearesidentsandbusinessesduringconstruction.However,constructingan urbansectionwasultimatelythegoalforthissegmentofEdmonsonAvenue,andcould beconsideredbyCounciliftheyfeelthetimeisrighttospendthemoneytocomplete theseimprovements. Parkingwillneedtoberestrictedalongbothsidesoftheroad,foreitheroptionproposed, inordertoconformtoMn/DOTStateAidstandardswhichwillallowtheCitytousestate aidfundstopayforaportionoftheimprovements. FallonAvenueProposedImprovements FallonAvenueiscurrentlyaruralroadwithapavementwidthof22feetsouthofSchool Boulevard.Existing(2008)trafficcountsarelessthan1,000ADT.Projected(2030) ADT’sareunknownatthistime. Thisfeasibilityreportexaminestwoalternativepavementrehabilitationoptionsfor FallonAvenue. FallonAvenue–Option#1(RuralSectionReclaim&3½”Repave@2,800lf) Leaveasaruralroadatapproximatelythesameelevationbyreclaimingtheexisting bituminouspavementsectionbetweenSchoolBoulevardandHuntersCrossing.This involvesgrindingthepavementup,placingitovertheexistingaggregatebase, compactingit,thenplacinganew3½”bituminouspavementsurfaceoverthereclaimed material.Thepavementwidthisproposedtoremainat22-feet.Existingdrainage culvertswouldbecleanedandreusedwhereverpractical.Insummary: Reclaimexistingpavementsection&repavew/3½”bituminouspavement Construct11’lanesw/1’aggregateshoulders=24’totalwidth(currently22’) Exploreextendingin-slopeintowetlandeastofFallonAvenue Someminorgradingofin-slopeswillberequired Minorturfrestorationwillberequired City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 8 FallonAvenue–Option#2(RuralSection1½”Overlay@2,800lf) LeaveFallonAvenueasaruralroadatapproximatelythesameelevationbetweenSchool BoulevardandHuntersCrossingbymilling1½“offtheexistingpavementsurfaceatall sawcutlocations,thenoverlayingtheroadwaywithanew1½“matofbituminous pavement.Thistreatmenttypicallyextendstheusefullifeofthepavementby10yearsor more,buttheexistingcrackswilllikelybegintoreflectthroughthenewpavement surfacewithin1to3years.Existingdrainageculvertswouldbecleanedandreused whereverpractical.Insummary: Milljointareasonlyandoverlayexistingpavementw/1½”newbituminous pavement Construct11’lanesw/1’aggregateshoulders=24’totalwidth(currently22’) Exploreextendingin-slopeintowetlandeastofFallonAvenue Minorturfrestorationwillberequired Option#1wouldbemorecostlyandwouldincreasetheconstructiontimeandimpactsto arearesidentsandbusinessesduringconstruction,butitwouldbethebestoptionif Councilthinksthatlargescaleresidentialdevelopmentwillnotreturnformanyyearsto come,therebyavoidingtheneedtoinstallthedeepsanitaryinterceptorsewerunder FallonAvenue. Option#2 couldbeconsideredifitisanticipatedthatthefuturetrunksanitarysewerneeded tobeextendedundertheroadwayinthenext10years,inwhichcasethiswouldbealess expensiveoption.However,theexistingcrackswillresurfaceandtheresultsofa reclamationandcontinuedmaintenancewouldprovideamoreaestheticallypleasingand longerlastingsurface. ParkingiscurrentlyrestrictedalongtheeastsideofFallonAvenueacrossfromPioneer Parktopreventchildrenfromrunningintotheroadbetweencars,whichhasbeenan issueduringpeakparkuses.Thisrestrictionisproposedtobecontinued. FenningAvenueProposedImprovements FenningAvenueiscurrentlyaruralroadwithapavementwidthof22feetsouthof SchoolBoulevard.Theprojected(2030)trafficvolumeis4,900ADT. FenningAvenue(RuralSection1½”Overlay@3,600lf) FenningAvenueisproposedtoberehabilitatedbymilling1½“oftheexistingpavement surfaceofftheroadandoverlayingthemilledsurfacewithanew1½“matofbituminous pavement,afterwhich1-footgravelshoulderswouldbeconstructedalongeachside. Thistreatmentshouldextendtheusefullifeofthepavementbyabout10years,andthe existingcrackswilllikelybegintoreflectthroughthenewpavementsurfacewithin1to2 years.Existingdrainageculvertswouldbecleanedandreusedwheneverpractical.In summary: Milljointareasonlyandoverlayexistingpavementw/1½”newbituminous pavement City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 9 Construct10’lanesw/1’aggregateshoulders=22’totalwidth(currently22’) Someminorgradingofin-slopeswillberequired Minorturfrestorationwillberequired ParkingisnotcurrentlyrestrictedalongthissegmentofFenningAvenue,andnoparking restrictionsareproposedatthistime. OtherConsiderations Nopublicinputmeetingswereheldwithpropertyownersalongtheseruralroad segmentstodiscusstheproposedimprovementspriortothePublicHearing. ItshouldbenotedthatwhilepreparingtheFeasibilityReportaresidentoftheGolden EagleVillasEstatesrequestedanoff-roadpedestrianpathwaybeconstructedalong EdmonsonAvenuebetweenSchoolBoulevardandChelseaRoad.Theresidentsaidthis pathwaywasneededtoallowhertoaccessbusinessesalongCedarStreetnorthof DundasRoadusingherelectricchair.Shesaidherchairrunsoutofelectricityifsheuses theSchoolBoulevardandTH25pathwaystoaccessthesebusinesses,andthatsheisnot comfortableusingEdmonsonAvenue.Thishasnotbeenthefirstrequestforapathway alongEdmonsonAvenue,andgiventheexistinghigh-speedsandtrafficvolumesalong thiscorridoritwouldmakesensetoconstructsuchapathwaysegmentatsometime. However,onMarch22nd theParksCommissionconsideredthisrequestandvoted unanimouslytodeferconstructionofthepathwayuntilthepropertieswestofEdmonson Avenuedevelop.Assuch,thispathwayisnotproposedtobeconstructedwiththe2012 RuralRoadImprovements. Funding TherearetwoimprovementoptionsproposedforeachEdmonsonAvenueandFallon Avenuesothereareatotaloffourpossiblealternativesforcompletingtheworkdefined herein.Thefouralternativesarelistedbelow,alongwiththeirestimatedcostswhich include10%contingencycostsand22%indirectcosts. AlternativeA=$870,680(Edmonsonoption#1,Fallonoption#1,FenningOverlay) AlternativeB=$807,390(Edmonsonoption#1,Fallonoption#2,FenningOverlay) AlternativeC=$2,065,900(Edmonsonoption#2,Fallonoption#1,Fenning Overlay) AlternativeD=$2,002,610(Edmonsonoption#2,Fallonoption#2,Fenning Overlay) ThisworkisidentifiedintheCity’s5-yearCapitalImprovementPlan,whichwillneedto beupdatedbasedonthefindingsoftheReportandsubsequentCouncilaction(s).In addition,the2012budgetincluded$500,000forcompletingimprovementstoseveral ruralroadsegments. City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 10 ThisprojectcanbefundedusingacombinationofCitycontributions,street reconstructionfunds,state-aidfunds,utilitytrunkfunds,andspecialassessmentsto benefittingpropertieswithintheCitylimits.Tobeconsistentwithpastpractice,any assessmentsappliedwillbebasedonthecurrentuseofthepropertyatthetimethe improvementsaremade.However,iftheuseofthepropertychangesinthefuture,the assessmentwouldbere-evaluatedatthetimebasedona20-yearpavementlife,not includingadditionalinterestcosts. Single-familyresidentialpropertyownersareproposedtobeassessedforroad improvementsattherateof$4,000perlothavingdirectaccesstoanyoftherehabilitated roads.Thisassessmentratereflectsnoincreaseoverthe2011StreetReconstruction projectassessmentrates. Non-residentialpropertyownersareproposedtobeassessedforroadimprovementsat therateof$51.00perfrontfootforpavementreclamationtoEdmonsonAvenue,$36.30 perfrontfootforpavementreclamationtoFallonAvenue,and$7.00perfrontfootforan overlayonFenningAvenue.Inaddition,$12perfrontfootisproposedforany sidewalk/pathwayimprovementsthatareconstructedadjacenttotheroadanyproperty frontson,ifapplicable.TheseratesarebasedonAlternativeA(Edmonsonoption#1, Fallonoption#1,FenningOverlay).IfanotheralternativeisauthorizedbyCouncilstaff willneedtorecalculatetheserates. UponadoptingtheMonticelloOrderlyAnnexationAgreement(OAA)inMayof2005, theCityassumedallresponsibilityformaintainingandimprovingall“lineroads”, definedwithintheOAAasanyroadwhosecenterlineactsastheboundarylinebetween theCityandtheTownship.NofundingisthereforebeingrequestedfromtheTownship fortheproposedimprovements. PropertiesinMonticelloTownshipthatfronttheproposedimprovementsarenot proposedtobeassesseduntiltheyareannexedintotheCity.Publichearingnoticeswere mailedto5differentpropertyownersof7propertiesintheTownshiptoprovidethe latitudetolevyassessmentsagainstthesepropertiesatsuchtimethatannexationoccurs. Ifannexationofabenefittingtownshippropertyoccurs,itislikelytohappenatthetime thepropertyownerseekstodevelopit.Underthisscenario,theCitywouldhavethe opportunitytoincorporatethepaymentoftheassessmentintoafuturedevelopment agreement.ThisappliestopropertiesalongFallonandFenningAvenuesonly.Itshould benotedthatinterestwouldnotbegintoaccrueuntilafterannexationoccurred,and if/whenassessmentsareconsideredforthesepropertiestherateswouldbecalculated basedontheuseofthepropertiesandtheywouldbeproratedtoaccountfortheageof theimprovements. Theproposedprojectscheduleisasfollows: CouncilOrdersFeasibilityReport.....................................................February13,2012 CouncilOrdersPublicHearing..............................................................March26,2012 CouncilConductsPublicHearing/AcceptsFeasibilityReport/ AuthorizesPlansandSpecifications..........................................................April9,2012 City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 11 PrivateUtilityCoordinationMeeting.............................................................May2012 SubmitFinalPlanstoStateAid..................................................................May7,2012 CouncilApprovesPlansandSpecifications/AuthorizesAdforBids..May14/29,2012 ReceiveBids............................................................................................June21,2012 AwardContract........................................................................................June25,2012 BeginConstruction................................................................................June/July2012 ConstructionComplete.............................................................................October2012 AssessmentHearing.............................................................................October22,2012 A1.BudgetImpact:TheestimatedprojectcostsidentifiedintheFeasibilityReport, whichincludea10%constructioncontingencyand22%indirectcostsforlegal, engineering,administrative,andfinancingitems,areasfollows: AlternativeA=$870,680 AlternativeB=$807,390 AlternativeC=$2,065,900 AlternativeD=$2,002,610 Duetotheexistinglowbondratesstaffrecommendsusingbondstofundthe project.Bondpaymentswouldthenbemadeusingtheappropriatefunds. AsCouncilisaware,thebiddingenvironmentforstreetimprovementprojectshas beenveryfavorablerecentlyduetotheeconomywithbidpricescominginat 10%-20%lessthansimilarprojectsconstructedseveralyearsago.All indicationsarethatthisfavorablebiddingenvironmentwillcontinuethisyear whichwilllikelyresultinsignificantsavingsfortheCityifwemoveaheadwith thisprojectin2012. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:StafffromtheEngineering,PublicWorksandFinance Departmentswouldbeimpactedbythisprojecttovaryingdegrees,bothduring thedesignandconstructionphases.ItshouldbenotedthatEngineering Departmentstaffwouldberesponsibleforprovidingfull-timeconstruction inspection. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportand approvingAlternativeA,andauthorizingPreparationofPlansandSpecifications for2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001. 2.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportand approvingAlternativeB,andauthorizingPreparationofPlansandSpecifications for2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001. City CouncilAgenda:04/09/12 12 3.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportand approvingAlternativeC,andauthorizingPreparationofPlansandSpecifications for2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001. 4.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportand approvingAlternativeD,andauthorizingPreparationofPlansandSpecifications for2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001. 5.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportwith modificationsasdirectedbyCouncil andauthorizingPreparationofPlansand Specificationsfor2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001. 6.MotiontodenyadoptingResolutionNo.2012-029atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1consideringthecurrentandforecast residentialhousingmarket. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2012-029 FeasibilityReportforCityProjectNo.12C001 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2012-029 ACCEPTINGFEASIBILITYREPORTANDAUTHORIZINGPREPARATIONOF PLANSANDSPECIFICATIONSFOR2012RURALROADIMPROVEMENTS, CITYPROJECTNO.12C001 WHEREAS,pursuanttoaresolutionoftheCounciladoptedonFebruary13,2012,aFeasibility ReporthasbeenpreparedbytheCityEngineerwithreferencetoproposedimprovementsto EdmonsonAvenuefromChelseaRoadtothesouthCitylimits,FallonAvenuefromSchool BoulevardtoHuntersCrossing,andFenningAvenuefromSchoolBoulevardto85th StreetNE, includingtherehabilitationand/orreconstructionofstreets,curbandgutter,andpublicutilities asneeded,andotherappurtenantwork;and WHEREAS,pursuanttoaresolutionoftheCityCounciladoptedonMarch26,2012,aPublic HearinghasbeencalledforApril9,2012at7p.m.,wheretheCouncilwillconsiderthe proposedimprovementsforsaidstreetsinaccordancewiththeFeasibilityReportsandthe assessmentofabuttingpropertiesforalloraportionofthecostoftheimprovementspursuantto MinnesotaStatutes,Chapter429;and WHEREAS,onMarch30,2012theClerkgavemailedandpublishednoticeofsuchhearingand improvementsasrequiredbylaw;and WHEREAS,theFeasibilityReportwasreceivedforreviewbytheCityCouncilonApril9, 2012. NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1.Suchimprovementisnecessary,cost-effectiveandfeasibleasdetailedinthefeasibility report.Thetotalcostoftheimprovementsforthefouridentifiedalternativesisestimated at: AlternativeA=$870,680(Edmonsonopt.#1,Fallonopt.#1,FenningOverlay) AlternativeB=$807,390(Edmonsonopt.#1,Fallonopt.#2,FenningOverlay) AlternativeC=$2,065,900(Edmonsonopt.#2,Fallonopt.#1,FenningOverlay) AlternativeD=$2,002,610(Edmonsonopt.#2,Fallonopt.#2,FenningOverlay) 2.TheCityEngineerisherebydesignatedastheengineerforthisimprovement.The engineershallprepareplansandspecificationsforthemakingofsuchimprovements. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis9th dayofApril,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO _____________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:4/9/12 1 10.Considerationofaddingpathwayimprovementsforthreesegmentsto2012Rural RoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001 (BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: StaffisrequestingCouncilauthorizationtoaddpathwayrehabilitationimprovementsfor threepathwaysegmentstothe2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001. Thethreepathwaysegmentsproposedtobeaddedtotheruralroadimprovementstotal roughly1,630feetinlengthandinclude: Segment1–OakRidgeEstates,OakviewCourttoOakRidgeCircle Segment2–MeadowOaks,OakviewLanetoMeadowLaneNE Segment3-BriarOaksEstate,HawthornePlaceNorthtoShadyOakCircle Thethreepathwaysegmentsareshownin Figure1,attachedassupportingdata. Thepavementsegmentsofthethreepathwaysegmentshavedeterioratedtovarying degrees.Segments1and2willrequiretotalreconstructiontorestoretheirusefullife. Segment32isalsoinpoorconditionbutatthistimestaffisonlyproposingtomake repairstoacross-culvertwhichhasbuckledthepathwayandisthereforepresenting safetyissuesforpathwayusers,aswellasseveralspotfixesusingamasticmaterialto featherthepathwayuptoleveloutsomelocalizedpavementheavingcausedbytree roots.Staffrecommendslettingtheremainderofthepathwaygountilitneedstobe reconstructed,whichwilllikelybein5yearsorso. TomWoodwithMn/DOTreviewedthethreepathwaysegmentsatstaff’srequestwhile hewasheretoevaluatethepavementsegmentsforthe2012RuralRoadImprovements. Hisrecommendation,whichstaffconcurswith,istocompleteapavementreclamation projectonpathwaysegments1and2,similartothemethodsproposedforEdmonson AvenueandFallonAvenue.Thisinvolvesreclaimingtheexistingpathwaypavement section,includingtheasphaltpavementandasmallamountofaggregatebase,then mixingthereclaimed/milledmaterialstogetherbeforereapplyingthemoverthe remainingbaseasanewrecycledaggregatebasecourse,whichisthencompactedbefore receiving2½”ofnewasphaltpavementsurfacing.Thiswillresultinapathwaysection thatwillbestrongerthanbeforeandwillhaveausefullifeofatleast20years.An overlaycouldbeconsidered,butthecrackingwouldsimplyreflectthroughinafew years. Theestimatedcostforthepathwayimprovementsidentifiedherein,includingallthree segments,isabout$49,000.Thisincludes10%contingencycostsand22%indirectcosts forWSBtoprepareplansandspecificationsforbiddingtheproject. ItshouldbenotedthatWSBalsocompletedonepavementcoring/soilboringinpathway segment1whiletheywerecompletingthecoringsontheruralroadstodeterminewhat thesubgradeconsistedofunderthepathways,whichwereallconstructedatroughlythe sametimeandthereforeshouldhavereceivedsimilarsubgradetreatments. CityCouncilAgenda:4/9/12 2 TheParksDepartmenthas$50,000initsbudgetfortheseimprovements. Itisbeingproposedtoaddthisworktothe2012RuralRoadImprovementstotrytoget thebestbidpricesduetoeconomiesofscalesincethesamecontractorcancomplete improvementstoboththeruralroadsandthepathwaysusingthesameequipment. ItshouldbenotedthattheParksDepartmentisaskingtocontractthisworkoutasthey plantocompleteasignificantamountofworkin–housethissummerandassuchcan’t takethisworkon,plustheydon’thavethenecessaryequipmenttocompletethe pavementreclaimwork. Aswasnotedinthepreviousagendaitem,theCityhasbenefittedfromthecompetitive biddingmarketoverthelastseveralyearsandprojectsbidin2012shouldagainreceive competitivebids.WhenCouncilhaschosentotakeadvantageoftheselowbidpricesit hasbenefittedtheCity’sbudgets. StaffwillpresentsomecostversuslifeexpectancydataduringtheCouncilmeetingin responsetoCouncil’srequestonMarch26th whenthisitemwastabled.MikeRief, WSB’spavementmanagementexpert,willalsobeinattendancetoanswerquestions. A1.BudgetImpact:Thepreliminarycostestimateforconstructingimprovementson all3pathwaysegmentsidentifiedhereinisabout$49,000.The2012Parks Departmentbudgetincludes$50,000forthiswork. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:StafffromtheEngineeringandPublicWorks Departmentswillspendabout20hoursassistingWSBwithpreparationofplans andspecifications,andwouldberesponsibleforinspectingconstructionofthe improvements. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovetheadditionofimprovementstothreepathwaysegmentstothe 2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001. 2.Motiontodenyadditionofimprovementstothreepathwaysegmentstothe2012 RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001,atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Figure1–ProposedPathwayImprovements