City Council Agenda Packet 03-12-2012AGENDA
REGULARMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL
Monday,March12,2012–7p.m.
MississippiRoom,MonticelloCommunityCenter
Mayor:ClintHerbst
CouncilMembers:LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta,BrianStumpf
1A.CalltoOrderandPledgeofAllegiance
1B.ProclamationofGirlScoutWeek(March12-17)
2A.ApprovalofMinutes–February27,2012SpecialMeeting
2B.ApprovalofMinutes–February27,2012SpecialJointMeeting
2C.ApprovalofMinutes–February27,2012RegularMeeting
3.Considerationofaddingitemstotheagenda
4.Citizencomments,publicserviceannouncements,andstaffupdates
a.CitizenComments:
b.PublicServiceAnnouncements:
1)MonticelloRecyclingDay(5/12)
2)MCCPrograms:PoolofGold(3/15)andMarchMadness5K(3/24)
c.StaffUpdates:
5.ConsentAgenda:
A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillsforMarch12th
B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments
C.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#554establishingregulationsallowingthe
Sheriff’sDepartmenttoconductbackgroundchecksforcityemploymentand
licenseapplicationsandSummaryOrdinance#554Aforpublication
D.ConsiderationofratifyingappointmentstotheBertramChainofLakesAdvisory
Council
E.ConsiderationofapprovingaMemorandumofUnderstandingbetweenthe
CountyofWrightandtheCityofMonticelloregardingtheYMCA/BertramLake
RegionalParkProject
SPECIALMEETING
6:15p.m.–W&SRateDiscussion
F.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-024permittingXcelEnergyto
installprivatesewerandwatersystemimprovements
G.Considerationofreducingtheretainageforthe2011StreetReconstruction
Improvements,CityProjectNo.11C001
H.ConsiderationofapprovingenhancementrequestsforGoodFridayandapolicy
adjustmentofbenefiteligiblehoursforpart-timeemployees
I.Considerationofapprovingpurchaseoftelevisionsanddigitalsignsoftware,
includingtheinstallationofequipmentandsoftware,withfundingfromCable
Commissionfranchisefeereimbursements
6.Considerationofitemsremovedfromtheconsentagendafordiscussion
7.ContinuationofPublicHearing–ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#552approving
amendmentstothe2012FeeScheduleforwaterandsewerrates
8.PublicHearing–ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-025approvingMinnesota
DepartmentofNaturalResourcesOutdoorRecreationGrantapplicationforaproposed
PhaseVPropertyAcquisitionattheBertramChainofLakesRegionalPark
9.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#547amendingMonticelloZoningOrdinance
Section4.5asrelatedtoTemporarySignage.Applicant:CityofMonticello
10.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#553approvingrezoningfromI-2(Heavy
Industrial)toB-2(LimitedBusinessDistrict)foraportionofLot1,Block2,Oakwood
IndustrialPark(100ChelseaRd).Applicant:QuarryChurch
11.Addeditems
12.Adjournment
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
5A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforMarch12th (TK)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheattachedbillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedsincethelastCouncilmeeting.
SubjecttoMNStatutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecks
forpayment.ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunless
directedotherwise.
IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillregisters,thesecanbeapprovedwith
theconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfromconsentanddiscussed
priortomakingamotionforapproval.
A1.BudgetImpact:None
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethebillregistersforatotalamountof$494,517.19.
2.MotiontoapprovethebillregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Billregisters
User:
Printed:03/08/2012 - 8:35AM
Ann.Zimmerman
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00201.03.2012
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:2490 HARLAND CLARKE CHECK Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True
3/6/12 (2) books - Deposit tickets 155.30 03/15/2012 101-41520-420300
155.30Check Total:
Vendor:2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True
3/6/12 Gradys - (1) glue spray 17.09 03/15/2012 601-49440-422110
3/6/12 Gradys - (1) 6 oz tear mender 9.61 03/15/2012 601-49440-422110
3/6/12 Gradys - (2) hinges 16.01 03/15/2012 601-49440-422300
3/6/12 Walmart - (1) camera 121.84 03/15/2012 101-43120-421990
3/6/12 Gradys - (1) nail air brad 9.07 03/15/2012 601-49440-422300
3/6/12 Gradys - (1) nail linoleum 2.34 03/15/2012 601-49440-422300
3/6/12 General Rental - alum side; alum cutter; roll holder; ect 52.37 03/15/2012 101-45201-422990
3/6/12 Home Dept - Pioneer Prk Bth (2) lights; (38) pc makita bit set 296.86 03/15/2012 101-45201-422300
3/6/12 Walmart - re-sale 59.49 03/15/2012 226-45127-425410
3/6/12 Walmart 24.00 03/15/2012 226-45127-421460
3/6/12 Walmart - (4) dawn soap 19.11 03/15/2012 226-45122-421100
3/6/12 Big Lake Lumber - (50) 24" coil; (2) 12' brickmold covers 715.12 03/15/2012 601-49440-422300
3/6/12 Cub - (6) table covers; (5) sets plates 52.86 03/15/2012 226-45127-421460
3/6/12 RAF Supply - (1) stereo w/cd play & charger 180.35 03/15/2012 226-45127-421720
3/6/12 RAF supply - credit due to reconditioned unit -50.00 03/15/2012 226-45127-421720
3/6/12 MN Rec - 3/1/12 "Legal Tools for a Healthier Future" K.B. 59.00 03/15/2012 226-45122-433200
3/6/12 Home Depot - bathroom door handle 31.98 03/15/2012 217-41990-422300
3/6/12 Union Speed - #204 - seat repair 480.16 03/15/2012 101-45201-422110
3/6/12 Gradys - (1) 1/2"xclose nipple 4.26 03/15/2012 226-45122-422990
3/6/12 Gradys - (1) cutter tube; (6) comprsn sleeves; ect 16.45 03/15/2012 226-45122-422990
3/6/12 Walmart - party room supplies 42.00 03/15/2012 226-45127-421460
3/6/12 Walmart - re-sale 11.03 03/15/2012 226-45127-425410
3/6/12 OfficeMax #1372 - (2) index maker lsr nopunch 8 60.47 03/15/2012 101-41520-420990
3/6/12 OfficeMax #1372 - (2) flipchart 66.24 03/15/2012 101-41310-420990
3/6/12 US Postal Serv - postage-budget books 11.35 03/15/2012 101-41520-432200
3/6/12 MN Society of CPAs - membership A.M. 245.00 03/15/2012 101-41520-443300
3/6/12 utx - Impark - Mpls parking for FNM meeting - T.K. 13.00 03/15/2012 655-49870-433100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/08/2012 - 8:35 AM)Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
3/6/12 utx - Engineer Supply Co - (1) Safco carrier strips 107.24 03/15/2012 101-43111-420990
3/6/12 utx - TimeClockSupplies.com - (2) Acroprint model 125-NR4 568.68 03/15/2012 655-49870-421990
3/6/12 Gradys - (6) copper tubes; (4) couples; (6) elbows 40.01 03/15/2012 217-41990-422300
3/6/12 Gradys - (2) adapters; (1) elbow 11.08 03/15/2012 217-41990-422300
3/6/12 U of M - 3/28/12 Best Practices-Corridor Mgmt Workshop - B.W. 50.00 03/15/2012 101-43111-433200
3/6/12 CoreNet Global 8/2-12/31/12 Membership - M.L.B. 283.32 03/15/2012 213-46301-443300
3/6/12 CoreNet Global - 2013 Membership - M.L.B. 849.96 03/15/2012 213-46301-443300
4,477.35Check Total:
Vendor:2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True
00004962633 Vanco Fitness Rewards February 2012 109.00 03/15/2012 226-45122-430700
00004964333 Gateway transaction fee February 2012 (1/2) 0.35 03/15/2012 601-49490-443980
00004964333 Gateway transaction fee February 2012 (1/2) 0.35 03/15/2012 602-49490-443980
109.70Check Total:
Vendor:2546 WELLS FARGO BANK NA Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True
3/2/12 FNM Series 2008 interest 147,111.46 03/15/2012 657-00000-101210
147,111.46Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
151,853.81
4
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/08/2012 - 8:35 AM)Page 2
User:
Printed:03/07/2012 - 10:58AM
Ann.Zimmerman
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00202.03.2012
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1006 ABM EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY LLC Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False
0131655-IN (4) 4" powerlock clamps 130.45 03/13/2012 602-49490-422100
130.45Check Total:
Vendor:2820 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False
Haz Mat Train Haz Mat Training (2) firefighters - Cargill to reimb 765.00 03/13/2012 101-42200-431990
765.00Check Total:
Vendor:2282 ALBIN ACQUISITION CORPORATION Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False
0220125487S (1) liquor license background check 23.00 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
0220125487S (2) background check 46.00 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
0220125487S (1) background check 23.00 03/13/2012 226-45122-431990
92.00Check Total:
Vendor:1026 AMERICAN COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False
1090599 Ordinance 543A 2/2 117.20 03/13/2012 101-41310-435100
1091123 1400 E Broadway 2/9; 2/16 151.02 03/13/2012 101-41910-435100
1091124 Shoreland 2/9; 2/16 201.36 03/13/2012 101-41910-435100
1091125 Temp Sign 2/9; 2/16 151.02 03/13/2012 101-41910-435100
1091127 CH 2 Amendment 2/9; 2/16 151.02 03/13/2012 101-41910-435100
1091316 Mature Lifestyles - senior living special tab section 2/19; 2/23 30.00 03/13/2012 226-45122-434990
1091486 EDA 2/9; 2/16 245.41 03/13/2012 213-46301-435100
1092381 2611 Red Oak Lane 2/16; 2/23 144.73 03/13/2012 101-41310-435100
1092382 Fee Schedule 2/16 91.56 03/13/2012 101-41310-435100
1,283.32Check Total:
Vendor:1028 AMERIPRIDE LINEN AND APPERAL SERVICES Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False
2200216304 17.60 03/13/2012 226-45122-441700
2200216304 60.65 03/13/2012 226-45122-431110
2200216304 12.04 03/13/2012 226-45122-441710
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
2200218804 17.60 03/13/2012 226-45122-441700
2200218804 60.65 03/13/2012 226-45122-431110
2200218804 12.04 03/13/2012 226-45122-441710
180.58Check Total:
Vendor:1036 APEC Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False
117508 (14) filters; (48) poly pads 276.75 03/13/2012 226-45122-422990
276.75Check Total:
Vendor:1038 APPERTS FOOD SERVICE Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False
1696804 4.75 03/13/2012 226-45122-433300
1696804 (42) pk coffee 38.75 03/13/2012 101-41940-443990
1696804 71.39 03/13/2012 226-45127-421460
1696804 re-sale 490.72 03/13/2012 226-45127-425410
1697729 return - re-sale -33.75 03/13/2012 226-45127-425410
1697730 return- re-sale -52.75 03/13/2012 226-45127-425410
1700313 5.25 03/13/2012 226-45122-433300
1700313 68.86 03/13/2012 226-45127-421460
1700313 (42) pk coffee 37.77 03/13/2012 101-41940-443990
1700313 re-sale 397.68 03/13/2012 226-45127-425410
1,028.67Check Total:
Vendor:1041 ARCTIC GLACIER INC Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False
412205405 re-sale 42.04 03/13/2012 609-49750-425500
42.04Check Total:
Vendor:2808 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False
24468 Well #3 - travel time not invoiced x/ref w/#24414; ck wiring;ect 468.00 03/13/2012 601-49440-431990
468.00Check Total:
Vendor:1618 MEGAN BARNETT LIVGARD Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True
2/1-2/15/12 Mileage -2/1 St Louis Pk & 2/7 St Paul; 2/7 & 2/15 meals 83.09 03/13/2012 101-46500-433100
2/1-2/15/12 utx - parking 2/7 St Paul 10.00 03/13/2012 101-46500-433100
93.09Check Total:
Vendor:1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False
72263200 19.80 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
72263200 1,027.90 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
72263200 180.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
72351900 12.10 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
72351900 795.80 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
2,035.60Check Total:
Vendor:1066 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False
1354725 (28) pizzas 140.00 03/13/2012 226-45127-421460
1354725 re-sale - (32) pizzas 160.00 03/13/2012 226-45127-425410
300.00Check Total:
Vendor:1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False
134697 re-sale 12.60 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
134697 re-sale 65.60 03/13/2012 609-49750-425500
134698 222.50 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
134701 6.40 03/13/2012 226-45127-421460
134701 re-sale 422.00 03/13/2012 226-45127-425410
137128 re-sale 108.60 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
137129 65.25 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
137131 19.20 03/13/2012 226-45127-421460
137131 re-sale 918.00 03/13/2012 226-45127-425410
1,840.15Check Total:
Vendor:2576 BIG LAKE LUMBER Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False
1690 (1) front bumper assymb 240.47 03/13/2012 101-43120-422110
240.47Check Total:
Vendor:2535 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False
903606284 (1000) P5203 347.44 03/13/2012 656-49877-421800
347.44Check Total:
Vendor:1079 BOYER TRUCKS ROGERS Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False
108687R #107 - (1) asy-O tube; (1) I indicator 299.71 03/13/2012 101-43120-422110
299.71Check Total:
Vendor:2047 BRIDGE WATER TELEPHONE COMPANY Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False
665FNMT-S-12044 Voice - interconnet fees 2/13-3/12/12 425.77 03/13/2012 655-49860-430910
425.77Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1086 BURNHAM TREE EXPERTS Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False
1542 Ellison Park - (1) Elm prune & haul debris 427.50 03/13/2012 224-46102-431990
427.50Check Total:
Vendor:2286 KERRY BURRI Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True
2/27/12 2/27/12 pizza for CC/PC/EDA mtg 33.46 03/13/2012 101-41110-443990
2/27/12 Mileage reimbursement - pizza 2/27/12 0.40 03/13/2012 101-41310-433100
33.86Check Total:
Vendor:1098 CCG CONSULTING LLC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False
3020M 1/12 Bal 12/30/11 File Revisions to Interstate Access Tariff 500.00 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
500.00Check Total:
Vendor:1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: False
2/29/12 8000014331-5 68.52 03/13/2012 217-41990-438300
2/29/12 8000014331-5 108.33 03/13/2012 101-45201-438300
2/29/12 8000014331-5 637.90 03/13/2012 101-42200-438300
2/29/12 8000014331-5 2,714.26 03/13/2012 101-43127-438300
3,529.01Check Total:
Vendor:1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False
633008 utx - helium; freight 196.50 03/13/2012 226-45127-421460
633008 hazard material charge 4.50 03/13/2012 226-45127-421460
201.00Check Total:
Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False
R72010610612061 Intrastate access charges 3/1-3/31/12 600.00 03/13/2012 655-49860-430910
600.00Check Total:
Vendor:1112 CINTAS FIRST AID AND SAFETY Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False
470784739 Weekly bathroom cleaning 64.13 03/13/2012 609-49754-431100
64.13Check Total:
Vendor:1123 CRABTREE COMPANIES INC Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False
106811 3/21-12/31/12 Training Center Gate 1 for laserfiche support 781.40 03/13/2012 101-41920-430910
106811 1/1-3/21/13 Training Center Gate 1 for laserfiche support 156.32 03/13/2012 101-00000-155010
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 4
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
937.72Check Total:
Vendor:1126 CUB FOODS - MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False
2/25/12 re-sale 14.58 03/13/2012 609-49750-425500
2/25/12 re-sale 12.17 03/13/2012 609-49750-425500
2/25/12 12 pk charmin tissue; dog food; cat ltr 14.37 03/13/2012 101-42700-421990
2/25/12 (3) lysol spray; swiffer clothes; laundry detrg; ect 65.65 03/13/2012 101-42700-421100
2/25/12 re-sale 15.56 03/13/2012 609-49750-425500
2/25/12 (3) coffee; (2) pk ketchup 36.26 03/13/2012 101-43127-443990
2/25/12 (2) clorox wipes 5.75 03/13/2012 101-43127-421100
2/25/12 (4) klnx; (4) bx spoons; (6) bx forks; (1) soft tissue; ect 39.60 03/13/2012 101-43127-421990
2/25/12 re-sale 13.43 03/13/2012 609-49750-425500
217.37Check Total:
Vendor:1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False
1015662 16,428.96 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
1015681 410.70 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
1015681 re-sale 125.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
1015707 11,558.83 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
1015707 re-sale 42.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425500
1015742 897.95 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
2859 539.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
2876 276.60 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
30,279.04Check Total:
Vendor:1134 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False
638965 2,282.15 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
638965 re-sale 21.50 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
639924 530.35 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
2,834.00Check Total:
Vendor:1140 DEX MEDIA EAST INC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False
650957055 2/1-11/10/12 Buffalo White & Yellow; Buffalo lyp 1,850.21 03/13/2012 655-49870-434990
1,850.21Check Total:
Vendor:2821 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False
3/1/12 ZEDTMS - (18.5) hrs Professional services for February 2012 2,775.00 03/13/2012 213-46502-431990
3/1/12 ZEDTMS - Mileage reimbursement for February 2012 69.93 03/13/2012 213-46502-431990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 5
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
2,844.93Check Total:
Vendor:1157 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False
COPY of 343276 TIF Dist1-22 Analysis - (see 12/31/11 & 1/1/12 J/E-2011 payable) 1,045.00 03/13/2012 213-46522-431990
1,045.00Check Total:
Vendor:1793 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: False
MKN022312-1 (2) led beacon 2 levels of 8 diodes 332.71 03/13/2012 101-43120-422110
332.71Check Total:
Vendor:1722 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT & SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False
9602 Sweep parts - (1) 600/FHD curtain set 449.20 03/13/2012 101-43120-422100
449.20Check Total:
Vendor:1680 EPIC PRODUCTS INC Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False
363503-IN 15.29 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
363503-IN re-sale 100.50 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
363514-IN re-sale 69.75 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
185.54Check Total:
Vendor:2650 DWIGHT G ERICKSON Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: False
93341 Labor - #107 - modify tnk set; row TQ core 200.00 03/13/2012 101-43120-422110
93341 #107 - modify tnk set; row TQ core 915.00 03/13/2012 101-43120-422110
1,115.00Check Total:
Vendor:1878 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False
RR1103 (1) CB grate 260.78 03/13/2012 101-43130-422420
260.78Check Total:
Vendor:1170 FASTENAL COMPANY Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False
MNMON67818 West Bridge Park - (1) trempro 640/642 5GA 246.44 03/13/2012 101-45201-421650
MNMON67852 (2) clevis pins; (2) flng lk; (2) strips 6.33 03/13/2012 101-45201-422300
252.77Check Total:
Vendor:1171 FEDERAL EXPRESS Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False
7-792-31750 Recipient - Polcom Inc Tracy CA 9.72 03/13/2012 655-49870-432400
7-799-34121 Recipient - c/o Hazels Hol Spot Choice Log Carrollton TX 52.91 03/13/2012 655-49870-432400
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 6
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
62.63Check Total:
Vendor:1173 FERRELLAS-5646 Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False
RNT4363784 Propane tank rental 2/8/12 - 2/7/13 38.48 03/13/2012 101-43127-441500
38.48Check Total:
Vendor:1174 FINKEN WATER CENTERS Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False
1921982 Cust #405689 March 2012 cooler rental - School Blvd 5.34 03/13/2012 655-49870-441500
1921992 Cust #405689 March 2012 cooler rental - 6th St 5.34 03/13/2012 655-49870-441500
1922002 Cust #405689 March 2012 keurig rental - 6th St 5.34 03/13/2012 655-49870-441500
1924752 Cust #401437 March 2012 cooler rental 10.15 03/13/2012 609-49754-441500
1930602 Cust #5232 March 2012 cooler rental 9.62 03/13/2012 217-41990-441500
1930622 Cust #5221 March 2012 cooler rental 5.34 03/13/2012 101-41940-441500
1930632 Cust #1064 March 2012 cooler rental 10.15 03/13/2012 226-45122-441500
92604TB Cust #5232 (3) 5 gal drinking water 17.85 03/13/2012 217-41990-443990
92647TB Cust #401437 (7) 5 gal drinking water 50.65 03/13/2012 609-49754-443990
92647TB Cust #401437 (4) 5 oz cups 14.96 03/13/2012 609-49754-421990
92649TB Cust #5221 (10) 5 gal drinking water 59.50 03/13/2012 101-41940-443990
92650TB Cust #1064 (2) 5 gal drinking water 11.90 03/13/2012 226-45122-443990
92650TB Cust #1064 (4) 5 oz cups 14.96 03/13/2012 226-45122-421990
92816TB Cust #405689 (2) 5 gal drinking water - 6th St 11.90 03/13/2012 655-49870-443990
94775TB Cust #405689 (4) 5 gal drinking water - School Blvd 23.80 03/13/2012 655-49870-443990
94803TB Cust #405689 (1) 5 gal drinking water - 6th St 5.95 03/13/2012 655-49870-443990
96501TB Cust #5232 (3) 5 gal drinking water 11.90 03/13/2012 217-41990-443990
96501TB Cust #5232 (1) 5 oz cups 3.74 03/13/2012 217-41990-421990
96541TB Cust #401437 (6) 5 gal drinking water 41.70 03/13/2012 609-49754-443990
96541TB Cust #401437 (2) 5 oz cups 7.48 03/13/2012 609-49754-421990
96543TB Cust #5221 (10) 5 gal drinking water 59.50 03/13/2012 101-41940-443990
387.07Check Total:
Vendor:1177 FIRE INSTRUCTION RESCUE EDUCAT Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False
08907 10/22 Haz Mat Operatns; 12/17/11 Haz Mat Tech (Cargill to reimb) 11,750.00 03/13/2012 101-42200-433200
11,750.00Check Total:
Vendor:1179 FIRE SAFETY USA INC Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False
50154 (4) Extrication glove; (4) suspender; (4) decal 323.80 03/13/2012 101-42200-421120
50154 utx - (1) 1 gal Diamondplate cleaner kit; (1) gal Plug N Dike 111.20 03/13/2012 101-42200-421990
435.00Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 7
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1186 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False
15010 (1) packing kit; (1) valve kit 655.00 03/13/2012 602-49490-422100
655.00Check Total:
Vendor:1194 G AND K SERVICES Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False
1043117767 Floor mats 31.14 03/13/2012 217-41990-431900
1043119623 Floor mats 122.29 03/13/2012 609-49754-431900
1043122723 Floor mats 31.14 03/13/2012 217-41990-431900
184.57Check Total:
Vendor:1201 RAYMOND J GLUNZ Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False
677585 3/4/12 S. Rust 430.00 03/13/2012 651-49010-431150
731396 2/18/12 D. Sherritt 530.00 03/13/2012 651-49010-431150
731397 2/21/12 D. Dorf 500.00 03/13/2012 651-49010-431150
1,460.00Check Total:
Vendor:1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: True
34002 February 2012 10.87 03/13/2012 601-49440-422770
34002 February 2012 10.88 03/13/2012 656-49877-422770
21.75Check Total:
Vendor:1591 GRADY'S ACE HARDWARE Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: False
876299 Rack for hand weights - (3) elbows; (5) 1"x10' pipes; ect 73.47 03/13/2012 226-45127-424600
876765 Front Desk - (1) 16oz glue Titebond 2 18.15 03/13/2012 101-41940-422990
880024 (1) 3/8x36" rod thread 5.12 03/13/2012 602-49490-421990
880148 (1) 5x8 nylon flag 60.91 03/13/2012 101-45201-421650
880153 (1) plumb kit; (2) valves; (5) 1"x10" copper tubes 95.03 03/13/2012 601-49440-421990
880895 Chamber office - (2) ring sealant (returned - see 880959) 10.24 03/13/2012 101-45172-440100
880898 (1) corner brace; (1) silicone caulk 10.99 03/13/2012 601-49440-421990
880959 Chamber office - return ring sealants - see 880895 -10.24 03/13/2012 101-45172-440100
881254 (6) elbows; (1) valve ball 34.13 03/13/2012 601-49440-421990
881321 (2) adapters; (1) nylon bushing 10.55 03/13/2012 601-49440-421990
881323 (1) 12oz spray paint 4.26 03/13/2012 601-49440-421990
881326 Chamber office - (1) tub caulk silicone; (2) wallplate; ect. 11.06 03/13/2012 101-45172-440100
881328 (1) PVC tube; (1) couple; (2) slip joint washers 13.53 03/13/2012 101-45201-421650
881803 Chamber office - (1) toilet tank repair no siphon 15.49 03/13/2012 101-45172-440100
883778 return - (1) valve ball; relect numb & letters -18.36 03/13/2012 601-49440-421990
884112 West Bridge Park - (3) folding tbles; (4) flags; ect 328.01 03/13/2012 101-45201-421650
884456 (1) bolt extractor kit 16.55 03/13/2012 226-45122-422990
886054 (2) reducer couplings; (1) teflon tape 15.46 03/13/2012 101-42200-421990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 8
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
886510 (1) nail air brad 9.07 03/13/2012 601-49440-422300
886511 return - (1) nail air brad x/ref w/#886510 -9.07 03/13/2012 601-49440-422300
694.35Check Total:
Vendor:2302 GRAND PERE WINES INC Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False
28138 3.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
28138 300.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
303.00Check Total:
Vendor:1206 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False
136555 27.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
136555 1,152.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
1,179.00Check Total:
Vendor:1217 RANDY HABERMAN Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: True
03/03/2012 Reimbursement - boiler's operator license 45.00 03/13/2012 226-45122-443700
45.00Check Total:
Vendor:1750 HBC HIAWATHA BROADBAND COMM INC Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True
6235 (25) hrs 2,262.50 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
6235 Reimb postage (106) late notices 46.64 03/13/2012 655-49870-432200
6235 Mgmt Fee-includes video content mgmt & tech support services 5,224.25 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
6235 Neustar porting fees 74.71 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
6235 (2.75) hrs - LNP porting requests processed 206.25 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
6235 1690 SUBS @ $2/SUB for use of OSS System 3,380.00 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
6235 1690 SUBS @ $2.5 /SUB for billing services 4,225.00 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
6235 Reimb Source One inv 2011 - "Do Not Call" and "MN Relay" inserts 53.44 03/13/2012 655-49870-421990
6235 Reimb 1/18/12 lunch w/Springsted - Manuel DeAngel 5.12 03/13/2012 655-49870-433100
6235 Reimb 1/26-1/27/12 mileage 156.64 03/13/2012 655-49870-433100
6235 Reimb Thawte Inc inv 2530132766 - 2 yr SSL Web Server Cert 349.00 03/13/2012 655-49870-430920
15,983.55Check Total:
Vendor:1224 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False
4440588 (60) arm touchpads; (500) mtr washers; (1) noz cap; ect 1,434.44 03/13/2012 601-49440-422701
4452677 (25) #21 gaskets 52.97 03/13/2012 601-49440-422701
4470625 (25) SR 5/8" full liner for bottom plate 53.48 03/13/2012 601-49440-422701
1,540.89Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 9
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1233 HIRSHFIELD'S INC Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False
030203551 Pioneer Park - (1) gal wht; (1) 10pk 4" gold stripe 47.54 03/13/2012 101-45201-422300
47.54Check Total:
Vendor:1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False
02/18/2012 Motor fuel 38.06 03/13/2012 101-42200-421200
02/18/2012 Motor fuel 16.65 03/13/2012 101-42200-421200
02/18/2012 Motor fuel 38.40 03/13/2012 101-42200-421200
02/18/2012 Motor fuel 41.73 03/13/2012 101-42200-421200
02/18/2012 Motor fuel 30.00 03/13/2012 101-42200-421200
02/18/2012 Motor fuel 41.64 03/13/2012 101-42200-421200
02/18/2012 Motor fuel 34.63 03/13/2012 101-42200-421200
02/18/2012 Propane tank exchange 23.50 03/13/2012 101-42200-421990
02/18/2012 Motor fuel credit 1/28/12 - 2/14/12 -14.81 03/13/2012 101-42200-421200
249.80Check Total:
Vendor:1244 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False
12021415 (5) 3/8" connecting nuts; (2) 1/2" union connectors 68.91 03/13/2012 226-45122-421610
68.91Check Total:
Vendor:1752 ICBITS LLC Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False
3775FIBER 5/1/12 - 4/30/13 Annual web hosting fee 300.00 03/13/2012 655-49870-430920
300.00Check Total:
Vendor:1263 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False
1237974 5.56 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1237974 373.85 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
1237975 12.97 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1237975 389.74 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
1240495 14.77 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1240495 1,098.74 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
1240496 18.07 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1240496 658.64 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
1243142 50.14 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1243142 3,905.78 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
1243143 50.03 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1243143 1,487.64 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
1243143 re-sale 59.95 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
1243144 6.95 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1243144 130.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 10
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1245423 26.41 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1245423 703.30 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
527702 -10.33 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
527703 -1.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
527704 -5.50 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
8,975.71Check Total:
Vendor:1266 KALTEC OF MINNESOTA INC Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False
69504 utx - H.E. V.V.D.- (2) RAM Memory 100.00 03/13/2012 655-49870-421990
69510 March 2012 Host and Manage TLS Networking Phase I 479.87 03/13/2012 101-41920-430900
69511 March 2012 Monticello Air - Hosted air Control Server 108.99 03/13/2012 655-49860-430930
688.86Check Total:
Vendor:2626 HARRY LANTTO Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: True
2/21/12 Planning Commission 2/21/12 50.00 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
50.00Check Total:
Vendor:1290 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False
156586 4/26/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop St Cloud - M.T. 20.00 03/13/2012 601-49440-433200
156600 4/26/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop St Cloud - T.M. 20.00 03/13/2012 101-43120-433200
156601 4/26/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop St Cloud - T.P. 20.00 03/13/2012 101-45201-433200
156602 4/11/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop Brooklyn Pk - B.P. 20.00 03/13/2012 101-43110-433200
156604 4/26/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop St Cloud - J.B. 20.00 03/13/2012 101-45201-433200
156604 4/26/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop St Cloud - B.G. 20.00 03/13/2012 101-43110-433200
157973 4/11/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop Brooklyn Pk - T.K. 20.00 03/13/2012 101-41520-433200
158612 4/11/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop Brooklyn Pk - M.H. 20.00 03/13/2012 101-43120-433200
158612 4/11/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop Brooklyn Pk - D.W. 20.00 03/13/2012 101-45201-433200
158612 4/11/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop Brooklyn Pk - J.R. 20.00 03/13/2012 601-49440-433200
200.00Check Total:
Vendor:1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False
2/16/12 LMCIT Claim #C0012141 date of loss 1/27/12 1,000.00 03/13/2012 101-49240-436990
1,000.00Check Total:
Vendor:1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False
3/1/12 Claim no C0006059 date of injury 1/2/11 M.V. 540.56 03/13/2012 101-49240-436990
540.56Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 11
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1292 LEROY JOB TRUCKING INC Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False
14524 (6) Animal charge 60.00 03/13/2012 101-42700-431990
60.00Check Total:
Vendor:1296 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False
48790 Plow parts - (2) large hole clevis; (2) pins; ect 192.87 03/13/2012 101-43125-422100
192.87Check Total:
Vendor:1300 DOUGLAS WILLIAM LYSENG Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: True
1224 Replacement monitor; keyboard sets 559.00 03/13/2012 101-41920-420250
1224 PDF convertor 256.46 03/13/2012 101-41920-430910
1224 IT/Technical services 1/5-2/22/12 4,183.12 03/13/2012 101-41920-430900
1224 (2) barcode reader 470.25 03/13/2012 609-49754-421990
5,468.83Check Total:
Vendor:1300 DOUGLAS WILLIAM LYSENG Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: True
1225 Computer serial # 03032012A - Tom Bose C167CH 1,314.22 03/13/2012 101-41920-424720
1225 Office 2010 Professional Edition (Retail single license) - Tom B 534.36 03/13/2012 101-41920-430910
1,848.58Check Total:
Vendor:1303 M AMUNDSON LLP Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False
126825 re-sale 22.20 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
126825 re-sale 853.49 03/13/2012 609-49750-425500
875.69Check Total:
Vendor:1386 M-R SIGN CO INC Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False
170309 (4) SNSFS 48"x09.00"; (20) SS18"x18" diaber 626.48 03/13/2012 101-43120-422600
170411 (2) SS72"x24" RECHIG100DEST 313.69 03/13/2012 101-43120-422600
170419 Bertram Park - (25) signs; (25) posts; (50) bolts; ect 599.84 03/13/2012 101-45201-422990
1,540.01Check Total:
Vendor:2819 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: False
2/1/12 Labor Relations Services through 1/31/12 237.50 03/13/2012 101-41800-430400
237.50Check Total:
Vendor:1229 MAJIRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: True
745 Monticello Air - creative services & 24x36 poster 191.63 03/13/2012 655-49870-421810
745 1/6/12 Meeting with I.M. re: billing inserts 21.25 03/13/2012 655-49870-431940
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 12
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
745 1/6/12 Marketing meeting with J.O. 127.50 03/13/2012 655-49870-431940
745 Monticello Times Ice Fishing Guide - creative fee - 2 ads 233.75 03/13/2012 655-49870-431940
745 Creative fee - 1/7/12 Upload tel subscriber notice to website 28.05 03/13/2012 655-49870-431940
745 Creative fee - 1/7/12 Change channel quide & upload to web 42.50 03/13/2012 655-49870-431940
745 Business cards - D. Wiebold - creative fee; (100) cards 60.12 03/13/2012 655-49870-421990
745 Jan UB insert - creative services; print/ship (4050) inserts 588.52 03/13/2012 655-49870-421810
1,293.32Check Total:
Vendor:1308 MARCO INC Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False
196900344 2/10 - 3/10/12 5,415.51 03/13/2012 101-41940-431900
5,415.51Check Total:
Vendor:2025 MAYFLOWER DISTRIBUTING CO Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False
2378262P balloons; placemats; plates 410.81 03/13/2012 226-45127-421460
410.81Check Total:
Vendor:1318 JONATHAN CALEB MELLBERG Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: True
2/27/12 City Council meeting recording 2/27/12 80.00 03/13/2012 101-41110-431990
80.00Check Total:
Vendor:1341 MMKR Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False
30316 Progress billing - services completed through 1/31/12 4,300.00 03/13/2012 101-41540-430100
4,300.00Check Total:
Vendor:1343 MN DEPT OF COMMERCE Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: False
1000017041 #6726 Indirect Assessment (phone) 4th Qtr FY 2012 23.31 03/13/2012 655-49870-443700
23.31Check Total:
Vendor:1347 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False
Lic #1C 1st Class C Engineer License 6/1/12 - 5/31/14 B Weldon 45.00 03/13/2012 226-45122-443700
45.00Check Total:
Vendor:1369 MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False
4361a Chamber lunch - Gov Dayton's office - Job Creation - M.B.L. 12.00 03/13/2012 101-46500-433200
12.00Check Total:
Vendor:1392 MONTICELLO NAPA Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 13
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
508843 (1) fuel filter 11.57 03/13/2012 101-43127-422120
512203 (2) 5 min expoxy 11.86 03/13/2012 101-43127-421990
513877 #105 - (25) primary wires; (12) battery cable lugs 108.35 03/13/2012 101-43120-422110
513922 (1) white mix ration 1:1 58.35 03/13/2012 101-43127-421510
514058 (1) lacquer thinner 11.21 03/13/2012 101-43127-421510
514527 (1) vermillion mix ratio 1:1; (1) imp wod fin paper; ect 124.38 03/13/2012 101-43127-421510
514771 Stock - (2) eletron flashers 37.73 03/13/2012 101-43127-422110
514779 (1) rubber undercoat 10.39 03/13/2012 101-43127-421510
514951 #218 - (4) brake tail bulbs 69.04 03/13/2012 101-45201-422100
515558 #218 - (2) lamps; shop gates (1) syn amso grease 36.94 03/13/2012 101-43127-421990
479.82Check Total:
Vendor:2512 MONTICELLO PLBG HTG AC LLC Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False
121334 LP Labor & Materials - replace (3) toilets at station 1,160.00 03/13/2012 101-42200-440100
1,160.00Check Total:
Vendor:1375 MONTICELLO PRINTING INC Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False
2/1/12 Business cards - 8 names 70.16 03/13/2012 217-41990-421990
2/1/12 (500) letterhead w/perforation 127.61 03/13/2012 101-41940-420300
2/15/12 (38) Lifesaving Award certificats w/set-up 44.62 03/13/2012 101-42200-420300
2/23/12 (200) wine tasting tickets 74.87 03/13/2012 609-49750-425550
317.26Check Total:
Vendor:1380 MONTICELLO VACUUM CENTER Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False
61405 Labor/parts 43.79 03/13/2012 226-45122-440440
43.79Check Total:
Vendor:2818 RUTH MORGAN Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False
3/3/12 Refund membership - eligible for Silver Sneakers membership 74.85 03/13/2012 226-45122-347910
3/3/12 Refund membership - eligible for Silver Sneakers membership 28.07 03/13/2012 226-45122-347920
3/3/12 Refund membership - eligible for Silver Sneakers membership 7.08 03/13/2012 226-00000-208100
110.00Check Total:
Vendor:1629 MP NEXLEVEL LLC Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: True
93496 Customer premise - 660 ft bored 1.25" duct; 1132 ft UO-1 pulling 4,859.80 03/13/2012 656-49877-431990
4,859.80Check Total:
Vendor:1393 NBP NORTHERN BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 14
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
418310-0 (6) pk index paper; (6) bx staples 84.52 03/13/2012 226-45122-420990
418310-1 (1) ct thermal rolls 58.25 03/13/2012 226-45122-420990
418442-0 (2) "copy" stamps; (1) stapler; (1) bx staples; ect 141.56 03/13/2012 101-41940-420990
418442-1 (2) "duplicate" stamps 12.95 03/13/2012 101-41940-420990
419710-0 (2) "draft" stamps; (10) binders 131.43 03/13/2012 101-41940-420990
422863-0 (2) 2 dsk bus crd hlder; (1) storage file 104.48 03/13/2012 101-41940-420990
422863-0 (80) rm copy paper 277.88 03/13/2012 101-41940-420300
423625-0 (12) clipboards; (6) view binders; (2) pk post-its; ect 160.88 03/13/2012 655-49870-420990
423625-0 (1) ct copy paper 42.74 03/13/2012 655-49870-420300
423625-0 (1) ct klnx 27.78 03/13/2012 655-49870-421990
423669-0 (2) bx index 8 tab 258.83 03/13/2012 101-41940-420990
425463-0 (3) rm xerox/dup 11x17 paper 24.01 03/13/2012 226-45122-420990
425463-0 (10) rm copy paper 34.74 03/13/2012 226-45122-420300
427076-0 (1) bx envelopes; (1) pk batteries; (2) dz perm markers; ect 164.91 03/13/2012 609-49754-420990
427076-0 (1) ct suckers 56.73 03/13/2012 609-49754-443990
427218-0 (4) ct thermal rolls 232.99 03/13/2012 609-49754-420990
C418442-1 return - (2) preink stamps -12.95 03/13/2012 101-41940-420990
C423625-0 return - (6) binders -56.21 03/13/2012 655-49870-420990
1,745.52Check Total:
Vendor:1150 NCH CORPORATION Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False
20548540 (185) GR5 tap bolts 249.93 03/13/2012 101-43127-421990
20552827 (18) heavy wall shrink tubes; (40) therma pods; ect 360.26 03/13/2012 101-43127-421990
610.19Check Total:
Vendor:2082 NEUSTAR INC Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False
M-10571704 SOW 1/1-1/31/12 4.09 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
M-10571705 1/1-1/31/12 Local Number Portability charges 112.83 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
116.92Check Total:
Vendor:2134 NFL NETWORK Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False
102437 NFL January 2012 872.32 03/13/2012 655-49860-430920
872.32Check Total:
Vendor:1771 NICROS INC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False
02281205 (1) lead climbing rope 645.12 03/13/2012 226-45127-421710
645.12Check Total:
Vendor:1402 NORTH SUBURBAN REG MUTUAL AID ASSOC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 15
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
61 2011 and 2012 Membership dues 300.00 03/13/2012 101-42200-443300
300.00Check Total:
Vendor:2492 NORTHLAND REFRIGERATION INC Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False
6163 City Hall entry heater - labor/supplies (3) couplings; ect 464.02 03/13/2012 226-45122-440100
6168 Pool vac - labor/older new plus & made elec repairs 225.00 03/13/2012 226-45122-440800
689.02Check Total:
Vendor:1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False
20146 General - PUD Ordinance 687.30 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
20146 General - CCD Ordinance 3,194.66 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
20147 ZQCSRZ - Quarry Church - Simonson's 485.51 03/13/2012 101-00000-220110
20148 2/21/12 Planning Commission meeting 150.00 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
4,517.47Check Total:
Vendor:1405 OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False
233353 (1) dz legal pads; (2) pk 3x5 note; (2) pk batteries; ect 102.17 03/13/2012 101-43110-420990
233353 (2) rm 8x11 orange paper 25.63 03/13/2012 101-43110-420300
127.80Check Total:
Vendor:1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: False
15727 (4) lamps 16.46 03/13/2012 602-49490-440440
15727 utx - freight 11.99 03/13/2012 602-49490-440440
44349 Motor model BF75 - 7 yr maint labor/supplies 1,729.99 03/13/2012 601-49440-440600
1,758.44Check Total:
Vendor:2131 ONVOY VOICE SERVICES Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: True
120302010584 Voice - Wholesale Switching Services 911.06 03/13/2012 655-49860-430910
120302010584 Voice - Operator Services 173.36 03/13/2012 655-49860-430910
120302010584 Voice - Wholesale 800 Switched 309.64 03/13/2012 655-49860-430910
1,394.06Check Total:
Vendor:2131 ONVOY VOICE SERVICES Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: True
120302008669 Voice - Dips services 1,417.33 03/13/2012 655-49860-430910
1,417.33Check Total:
Vendor:1419 PAN O GOLD CO ST CLOUD Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: False
010004205516 re-sale 29.88 03/13/2012 226-45127-425410
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 16
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
29.88Check Total:
Vendor:1421 PARK SUPPLY OF AMERICA INC Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: False
40512000 MCC showers & toilet seats - (17) shwr arms; (5) comm plast; ect 134.85 03/13/2012 226-45122-422100
40512001 (1) vac breaker; (1) shower arm; (2) tnk gaskets 54.16 03/13/2012 226-45122-422100
189.01Check Total:
Vendor:1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False
8339526-IN 12.50 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
8339526-IN 640.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
8340290-IN 7.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
8340290-IN 313.48 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
972.98Check Total:
Vendor:1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: False
2199347 14.47 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
2199347 848.05 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
2199348 13.43 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
2199348 545.84 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
2201177 2.78 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
2201177 99.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
2201178 1.39 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
2201178 44.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
2202995 19.80 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
2202995 1,260.55 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
2202996 19.22 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
2202996 640.58 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
3477747 -1.39 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
3477747 -32.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
3,475.72Check Total:
Vendor:1428 PINNACLE PUBLISHING LLC Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: False
INV0164535 Monticello Feb 2012 TDS book# 038478 635.40 03/13/2012 101-41940-435200
INV0164546 Monticello Feb 2012 TDS book# 038478 406.80 03/13/2012 609-49754-434990
INV0164554 Monticello Feb 2012 TDS book# 038478 1,048.32 03/13/2012 655-49870-434990
2,090.52Check Total:
Vendor:1440 PRO AG CORP CONSULTANTS INC Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: False
1421 Final 1/3 2011 Crop Consulting on Biosolids Application site 1,075.00 03/13/2012 602-49480-431990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 17
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1,075.00Check Total:
Vendor:1442 PURCELL PLUMBING AND HEATING INC Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: False
830954 Chamber office - (1) toilet flex; (1) Kohler tank to bowl gasket 21.35 03/13/2012 101-45172-440100
21.35Check Total:
Vendor:1444 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: False
576977-00 27.02 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
576977-00 787.37 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
576977-00 282.98 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
576977-00 re-sale 35.60 03/13/2012 609-49750-425500
579766-00 20.51 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
579766-00 717.18 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
579766-00 121.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
1,991.66Check Total:
Vendor:1453 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: False
236222 (1) O-ring; (2) gaskets; (1) 2" valve spring 97.94 03/13/2012 226-45122-421610
97.94Check Total:
Vendor:1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 105 ACH Enabled: False
2/28/12 FNM Gasoline 621.31 03/13/2012 655-49870-421200
621.31Check Total:
Vendor:1472 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP Check Sequence: 106 ACH Enabled: False
57091883 10g parts washer service - solvent 172.20 03/13/2012 101-43127-431990
172.20Check Total:
Vendor:1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 107 ACH Enabled: True
3/15/12 Contract 1,520.13 03/13/2012 101-42700-431200
1,520.13Check Total:
Vendor:1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 108 ACH Enabled: True
2/1-2/29/12 Mileage reimbursement 105.45 03/13/2012 101-42700-433100
105.45Check Total:
Vendor:2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 109 ACH Enabled: False
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 18
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
W3449932 Security - 2/10/12 Knights of Columbus R1624 179.55 03/13/2012 226-45122-431992
179.55Check Total:
Vendor:1361 SHRED IT USA INC Check Sequence: 110 ACH Enabled: False
0253895443 Document shredding 13.00 03/13/2012 101-43110-431990
0253901120 Document shredding 13.00 03/13/2012 101-41940-431990
0253901122 Document shredding 13.00 03/13/2012 655-49870-431990
39.00Check Total:
Vendor:1487 CATHY SHUMAN Check Sequence: 111 ACH Enabled: True
3/5/12 Blaine C.H. - 3/5/12 Open Meeting Law/Data Privacy Seminar 42.18 03/13/2012 101-41310-433100
42.18Check Total:
Vendor:2245 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC Check Sequence: 112 ACH Enabled: False
1800019269 Sales tax on materials - refer to invoice 900574977 pd 2/14/12 106.01 03/13/2012 601-49440-431990
106.01Check Total:
Vendor:1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 113 ACH Enabled: False
690638 Firehall cleaning 2/5-2/18/12 100.00 03/13/2012 101-42200-431100
100.00Check Total:
Vendor:1497 SPECTRUM SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 114 ACH Enabled: False
217417 (1) case 2ply tissue 47.73 03/13/2012 101-41941-421990
217418 re-sale 102.22 03/13/2012 226-45127-425410
217418 (2) cs can liners; (1) 6/cs bleach; (2) cs wipes; ect 256.98 03/13/2012 226-45122-421100
217418 (1) cs sanitary napkins 26.06 03/13/2012 226-45122-421990
217418 (2) top lid swing 103.46 03/13/2012 226-45122-422990
217509 re-turn - (2) top lid swing -103.46 03/13/2012 226-45122-422990
217519 (2) 125/2's pain stoppers 16.91 03/13/2012 226-45122-421990
217650 return - (2) 125/2's pain stoppers x/ref w/#217519 -16.91 03/13/2012 226-45122-421990
432.99Check Total:
Vendor:1937 CITY OF ST MICHAEL Check Sequence: 115 ACH Enabled: False
02152012-4 Haz Mat Training (4) firefighters - Cargill to reimb 2,138.23 03/13/2012 101-42200-431990
2,138.23Check Total:
Vendor:1506 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 116 ACH Enabled: False
1859373 (2) bales 12# bags 36.26 03/13/2012 609-49750-443990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 19
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1859373 re-sale 42.17 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
1859373 (1) case multifold towels 24.68 03/13/2012 609-49754-421990
103.11Check Total:
Vendor:2485 BANK OF AMERICA TELEMUNDO Check Sequence: 117 ACH Enabled: False
409420 MUN2 January 2012 46.41 03/13/2012 655-49860-430920
409420 MUN2 Hispanic Tier January 2012 0.34 03/13/2012 655-49860-430920
46.75Check Total:
Vendor:1520 MATT THEISEN Check Sequence: 118 ACH Enabled: True
2/22/12 (3) tool boxes 57.68 03/13/2012 601-49440-421990
57.68Check Total:
Vendor:1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 119 ACH Enabled: False
318897 34.50 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
677142 12,732.55 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
678072 15,875.30 03/13/2012 609-49750-425200
28,642.35Check Total:
Vendor:2614 TITAN MACHINERY Check Sequence: 120 ACH Enabled: False
9C04746 #117 - (1) latch; (1) spacer 31.54 03/13/2012 101-43120-422100
31.54Check Total:
Vendor:2429 VERIZON WIRELESS Check Sequence: 121 ACH Enabled: False
2704079658 763-688-5387 2/21-3/20/12 26.02 03/13/2012 101-41920-432100
2704079658 763-688-5616; 763-688-5936 2/21-3/20/12 52.04 03/13/2012 101-43115-432100
2704079658 763-954-1070 2/21-3/20/12 37.19 03/13/2012 101-43120-432100
2704079658 763-954-1076 2/21-3/20/12 26.04 03/13/2012 101-43110-432100
141.29Check Total:
Vendor:1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 122 ACH Enabled: False
25221931 re-sale 264.60 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
87519 re-sale 250.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425400
514.60Check Total:
Vendor:1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 123 ACH Enabled: False
52579-IN 5.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
52579-IN 265.17 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 20
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
52579-IN 136.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
406.17Check Total:
Vendor:1863 WEST METRO BUICK-PONTIAC-GMC INC Check Sequence: 124 ACH Enabled: False
147873 '02 Chev K1500 - oil change (mileage 51342) 32.72 03/13/2012 655-49870-440500
32.72Check Total:
Vendor:1570 BRUCE WESTBY Check Sequence: 125 ACH Enabled: True
1/18-3/2/12 Jan-Feb 2012 - personal vehicle mileage St Cld; Chanhassen; ect. 69.21 03/13/2012 101-43111-433100
1/18-3/2/12 Reimb City Engineers Assoc of MN 2012 annual dues 60.00 03/13/2012 101-43111-443300
1/18-3/2/12 Reimb City Eng Assoc of MN conference 1/25-1/27/12 Brooklyn Ctr 285.00 03/13/2012 101-43111-433200
414.21Check Total:
Vendor:1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 126 ACH Enabled: False
292689-00 6.30 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
292689-00 360.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
293087-00 14.85 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
293087-00 1,148.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
1,529.15Check Total:
Vendor:1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 127 ACH Enabled: False
398523 15.98 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
398523 1,024.50 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
1,040.48Check Total:
Vendor:1209 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE & SPIRITS Check Sequence: 128 ACH Enabled: False
707478 18.85 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
707478 1,620.88 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
707479 11.60 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
707479 648.83 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
710744 18.85 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
710744 1,518.32 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
710745 5.80 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
710745 339.75 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
854915 return x/ref w/#704387 -28.23 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
4,154.65Check Total:
Vendor:2573 WOODLAND HILL VINEYARDS LLC Check Sequence: 129 ACH Enabled: False
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 21
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1207 306.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
306.00Check Total:
Vendor:1657 WORLD CLASS WINES INC Check Sequence: 130 ACH Enabled: False
1719081 2.50 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1719081 228.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
1724013 6.69 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1724013 804.33 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
1724013 80.00 03/13/2012 609-49750-425300
1724025 5.31 03/13/2012 609-49750-433300
1724025 421.17 03/13/2012 609-49750-425100
1,548.00Check Total:
Vendor:1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 131 ACH Enabled: True
Patrol-12-3 March 2012 94,763.50 03/13/2012 101-42100-430500
94,763.50Check Total:
Vendor:1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER Check Sequence: 132 ACH Enabled: False
I201200000018 A-1193871 Key Land Homes Condititonal Use Proceed 46.00 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
I201200000018 A-1193872 Sunny Fresh Foods Inc Condititonal Use Proceed 46.00 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
I201200000018 A-1193873 Sell Real Estate Hdgs LLC Condititonal Use Proceed 46.00 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
I201200000018 A-1194506 Sunset Ponds LLC Development Agreement 46.00 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
I201200000018 A-1194858 Samuel Properties & Const Inc Conditional Use Proceed 46.00 03/13/2012 101-41910-431990
230.00Check Total:
Vendor:2810 WRIGHT COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES Check Sequence: 133 ACH Enabled: False
ICS 300 Registr PHEP-NIMS 300 Course - 2/29-3/2/12 R.H.; B.P 200.00 03/13/2012 101-41800-431960
200.00Check Total:
Vendor:1583 WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 134 ACH Enabled: False
2/27/12 HADCO lights @ East 7th St 357.75 03/13/2012 101-43160-431900
357.75Check Total:
Vendor:1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 135 ACH Enabled: False
1010000173 General - TH 25 342.50 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
1010000173 General - proj mgmt/coord - Kjellberg 484.00 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
1010000173 General - plan review - TH 25 822.00 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
101009075 State Aid Network - general - 2011 certification of mileage 49.50 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 22
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
101009075 State Aid Network - proj mgmt/coord - review 2012 changes 121.00 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
10102701132 10C010 - Monticello Maps - general 160.50 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
10102701132 10C010 - Monticello Maps - proj mgmt/coord 363.00 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
10102701132 10C010 - Monticello Maps - drawings/layouts 428.00 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
148847046 Prairie Rd Reconstruction - as-builts (no proj per A.M.) 158.00 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
148847046 Prairie Rd Reconstruction - mylar reproductns (no proj per A.M.) 141.90 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
149437020 10C005 - NE Quad 25/75 Tran Analysis -Ph 3 Const-proj mgmt/coord 181.50 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
149437020 10C005 - NE Quad 25/75 Tran Analysis -Ph 3 Const-pay voucher 72.00 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
149442015 11C001 -2011 Street Reconst - Ph 3 - proj mgmt/coord 665.50 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
149442015 11C001 -2011 Street Reconst - Ph 3 - meetings 363.00 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
149442015 11C001 -2011 Street Reconst - Ph 3 - pay voucher 132.50 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
149442015 11C001 -2011 Street Reconst - Ph 3 - as-builts 60.50 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
149442015 11C001 -2011 Street Reconst - Ph 4 - drawings/layouts 316.00 03/13/2012 400-43300-459010
149448011 ZRCFOS - Fallon Overpass Prelimin Design - proj mgmt/coord 548.00 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
14945601 ZEDTMS - Embracing Downtown - proj mgmt/coord 629.00 03/13/2012 213-46301-431990
14945601 ZEDTMS - Embracing Downtown - drawings/layouts 749.00 03/13/2012 213-46301-431990
16273207 Monti Wetland LGU - environmental documents 74.75 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
16275107 Z7STEX - 7th St Ext - proj mgmt/coord 439.50 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
16275107 Z7STEX - 7th St Ext - quantity/cost opinion 302.50 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
16275107 Z7STEX - 7th St Ext - meetings 121.00 03/13/2012 101-43111-430300
7,725.15Check Total:
Vendor:1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 136 ACH Enabled: False
2/16/12 51-6505909-4 114.19 03/13/2012 217-41990-438100
2/17/12 51-6505912-9 48.34 03/13/2012 101-42700-438100
2/17/12 51-9069641-8 1,397.02 03/13/2012 655-49870-438100
2/20/12 51-9348896-7 255.51 03/13/2012 101-41940-438100
2/20/12 51-9391437-3 207.50 03/13/2012 101-41941-438100
2/20/12 51-6505913-0 453.06 03/13/2012 101-42200-438100
2/20/12 51-0238874-9 99.48 03/13/2012 101-43160-438100
2/20/12 51-0238890-9 109.22 03/13/2012 101-43160-438100
2/20/12 51-7780310-4 69.12 03/13/2012 101-41940-438100
2/20/12 51-6505910-7 1,445.52 03/13/2012 609-49754-438100
2/20/12 51-6505911-8 1,816.48 03/13/2012 101-41940-438100
2/20/12 51-6505911-8 7,888.72 03/13/2012 226-45122-438100
2/20/12 51-6505911-8 467.10 03/13/2012 101-42800-438100
2/20/12 51-6505911-8 207.60 03/13/2012 101-42800-438100
2/20/12 51-4271112-2 832.36 03/13/2012 211-45501-438100
2/28/12 51-6505907-2 135.91 03/13/2012 101-43140-438100
2/28/12 51-6505916-3 13,829.82 03/13/2012 101-43160-438100
2/28/12 51-6505908-3 18.36 03/13/2012 101-42500-438100
2/29/12 51-6505905-0 5,655.02 03/13/2012 601-49440-438100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 23
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
35,050.33Check Total:
Vendor:1679 ZEP SALES AND SERVICE Check Sequence: 137 ACH Enabled: False
57441521 (1) dz zep 2000; (1) dz zep 75 184.86 03/13/2012 101-43127-421600
184.86Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
340,520.17
137
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/07/2012 - 10:58 AM)Page 24
User:
Printed:03/01/2012 - 9:56AM
Ann.Zimmerman
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00203.03.2012
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1345 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False
Plan Review 11C006 - Swimming Pool plan review 600.00 03/01/2012 226-45122-453010
600.00Check Total:
Vendor:1348 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False
Plan Review 11C006 - Plumbing plan review 150.00 03/01/2012 226-45122-453010
150.00Check Total:
Vendor:1366 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False
Sign Permits (2) temp sign permits - Pioneer Pk; WWTP 70.00 03/01/2012 101-41940-443700
70.00Check Total:
Vendor:1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False
2193374 11.12 03/01/2012 609-49750-433300
2193374 1,057.09 03/01/2012 609-49750-425100
1,068.21Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
1,888.21
4
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/01/2012 - 9:56 AM)Page 1
User:
Printed:02/24/2012 - 2:24PM
Ann.Zimmerman
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00205.02.2012
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True
2/6/12 Elections Workshop 3/20/12 C.S. 255.00 02/20/2012 101-41310-433200
255.00Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
255.00
1
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/24/2012 - 2:24 PM)Page 1
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
5B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred
recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe
hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers.
A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget)
A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining
involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as
needed,untilreplaced.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached
list.
2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures.
C.RECOMMENDATION:
BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff
recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas
listed.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Listofnew/terminatedemployees
Name Title Department Hire Date Class
Laura Gifford Certified Group Fitness Instructor MCC 2/23 PT
Tim Alberts Liquor Store Clerk Liquor Store 3/2 PT
Name Reason Department Last Day Class
Ramon Skillingstad Voluntary Liquor Store 2/17 PT
Brian Rousselow Voluntary Parks 3/2 PT
Eileen Pitel Voluntary MCC 2/17 PT
NEW EMPLOYEES
TERMINATING EMPLOYEES
Book1: 3/8/2012
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
5C.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#554establishingTitle1,Chapter8regulating
criminalhistorybackgroundinvestigationsandadoptingOrdinance#554Afor
summarypublication (JO/CS/TE)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityStaffisrequestingthatCounciladoptOrdinance#554whichwouldestablishanew
Chapter8underTitle1oftheCityCode,whichwouldregulatebackgroundchecksthat
needtobeconductedbytheWrightCountySheriff’sOffice,mainlyforlicensing
purposes.ThiswasbroughttotheattentionoftheCitybytheSheriff’sOfficewhenthe
Sheriffwasaskedtosignoffonapawnlicenserenewal.Attachedisanexcerptfromthe
LeagueofMNCitiesrelatingtocriminalhistorybackgroundchecks.
DuetoachangeinMinnesotastatutes,anordinancemustbeinplacetoallowthe
Sheriff’sOfficetoaccesstheMinnesotaBureauofCriminalApprehension’s
computerizedCriminalHistorydatabase.SincetheCitycontractswiththeSheriff’s
Departmenttoprovidepoliceservices,aCityordinanceshouldbeadoptedthat
establishesregulationsforconductingcriminalhistorybackgroundchecksthroughthe
CriminalJusticeDataNetwork(CJDN).JoelJamnikdraftedanordinancethatcovers
bothemploymentandlicensingbackgroundchecksandincludesthenecessarylanguage
tocomplywithstatestatutesandBCArequirements.
TheCityisrequiredtoconductbackgroundinvestigationsforsomeofthelicenseswe
issue,suchasliquorlicenses(newandrenewal),pawnbrokers(new),transientmerchants
(new)andafewothermiscellaneousbusinesslicenses.Wehavebeenrunningthese
throughtheSheriff’sOfficeuptothispointintime.InorderforCitystafftocontinue
thisrequiredprocess,itisrecommendedthatCounciladoptthenewordinanceas
proposed.Wealsorecommendadoptionofthesummaryordinancewhichwouldsave
theCitymoneyinpublishingcosts.
Atthistime,theCitydoesnotasktheSheriff’sDepartmenttocompletecriminalhistory
investigationsforemployment.Allapplicants,age18andolder,whoareoffered
employmentwiththecityhaveabackgroundcheckperformedthroughourHuman
Resourcesdepartment.However,thisordinancewouldgranttheauthoritytohavea
backgroundcheckperformedthroughtheBCA’sCJDN,ifnecessary.
A1.BudgetImpact:MinimalcostsfortheCityAttorneytodrafttheordinance
languageandforpublishingthesummaryordinance.TheCitycollectsfeeswith
thelicenseapplicationstocoverthecostofrequiredbackgroundchecks.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Minimal,aswealreadywereconductingbackground
checks.Thisordinanceputsusincompliancewithstaterequirements.
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
2
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#554establishingTitle1,Chapter8intheMonticello
CityCoderegulatingcriminalhistorybackgroundinvestigationsandadopting
Ordinance#554Aforsummarypublication.
2.MotiondenyingadoptionofOrdinance#554atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffsupportsAlternative#1.Pleasenotethatadoptionofasummaryordinance
requiresa4/5th approvalbyCouncil.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
ProposedOrdinanceNo.554–CriminalHistoryBackgroundInvestigations
SummaryOrdinanceNo.554A
LMCexcerptprovidedtoCitystaffregardingcriminalhistorychecks
ORDINANCENO.554
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
ANORDINANCERELATINGTOCRIMINALHISTORY
BACKGROUNDINVESTIGATIONSFORAPPLICANTSFOR
CITYEMPLOYMENTANDCITYLICENSES
THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTAORDAINS:
SECTION1.TheMonticelloCityCodeshallbeamendedbyaddingnewChapter8to
Title1toreadasfollows:
CHAPTER8
CRIMINALHISTORYBACKGROUNDINVESTIGATIONS
SECTION2.TheMonticelloCityCodeshallbeamendedbyaddingthefollowing
sectionstonewChapter8ofTitle1toreadasfollows:
SECTION:
1-8-1:Purpose
1-8-2:EmploymentBackgroundInvestigations
1-8-3:LicenseBackgroundInvestigations
1-8-1:PURPOSE:Thepurposeandintentofthissectionistoestablishregulationsthat
willallowlawenforcementaccesstoMinnesota’sComputerizedCriminalHistory
informationforspecifiednon-criminalpurposesofemploymentbackground
checksforthepersonsappointedbytheCitytoanypositionofemployment,
includingvolunteerpositions,andforlicensingbackgroundchecks.
1-8-2:EMPLOYMENTBACKGROUNDINVESTIGATIONS:TheWrightCounty
Sheriff’sDepartmentisherebyauthorized,astheexclusiveentitywithintheCity,
todoacriminalhistorybackgroundinvestigationonapplicantsforvolunteer
positionsandregularpart-timeorfull-timeemployeesoftheCityofMonticello
andotherpositionsthatarerequiredbylaw,workwithchildrenorvulnerable
adults,orthatareresponsibleforthemanagementordisbursementofpublic
funds,unlesstheCity’shiringauthorityconcludesthatabackgroundinvestigation
isnotneeded.
Inconductingthecriminalhistorybackgroundinvestigationinordertoscreen
employmentapplicants,theWrightCountySheriff’sDepartmentisauthorizedto
accessdatamaintainedintheMinnesotaBureauofCriminalApprehensions
ComputerizedCriminalHistoryinformationsysteminaccordancewithBCA
ORDINANCENO.554
policy.AnydatathatisaccessedandacquiredshallbemaintainedattheWright
CountySheriff’sDepartmentunderthecareandcustodyofthechieflaw
enforcementofficialorhisorherdesignee.Asummaryoftheresultsofthe
ComputerizedCriminalHistorydatamaybereleasedbytheWrightCounty
Sheriff’sDepartmenttothehiringauthority,includingtheCityCouncil,theCity
Administrator,orotherCitystaffinvolvedinthehiringprocess.
Beforetheinvestigationisundertaken,theapplicantmustauthorizetheWright
CountySheriff’sDepartmentbywrittenconsenttoundertaketheinvestigation.
ThewrittenconsentmustfullycomplywiththeprovisionsofMinn.Stat.Chap.
13regardingthecollection,maintenanceanduseoftheinformation.Exceptfor
thepositionssetforthinMinnesotaStatutesSection364.09,theCitywillnot
rejectanapplicantforemploymentonthebasisoftheapplicant’spriorconviction
unlessthecrimeisdirectlyrelatedtothepositionofemploymentsoughtandthe
convictionisforafelony,grossmisdemeanor,ormisdemeanorwithajail
sentence.IftheCityrejectstheapplicant'srequestonthisbasis,theCityshall
notifytheapplicantinwritingofthefollowing:
1.Thegroundsandreasonsforthedenial.
2.Theapplicantcomplaintandgrievanceproceduresetforthin
MinnesotaStatutesSection364.06.
3.Theearliestdatetheapplicantmayreapplyforemployment.
4.Thatallcompetentevidenceofrehabilitationwillbeconsidered
uponreapplication.
1-8-3:LICENSEBACKGROUNDINVESTIGATIONS:TheWrightCountySheriff’s
Departmentisherebyauthorized,astheexclusiveentitywithintheCity,todoa
criminalhistorybackgroundinvestigationonapplicantsforCitypermits,licenses,
andotherapprovalsunderthisTitleorotherprovisionsofstatelaworCityCode;
unlesstheCity’slicensingauthorityconcludesthatabackgroundinvestigationis
notneeded.
Inconductingthecriminalhistorybackgroundinvestigationinordertoscreen
licenseapplicants,theWrightCountySheriff’sDepartmentisauthorizedto
accessdatamaintainedintheMinnesotaBureauofCriminalApprehensions
ComputerizedCriminalHistoryinformationsysteminaccordancewithBCA
policy.AnydatathatisaccessedandacquiredshallbemaintainedattheWright
CountySheriff’sDepartmentunderthecareandcustodyofthechieflaw
enforcementofficialorhisorherdesignee.Asummaryoftheresultsofthe
ComputerizedCriminalHistorydatamaybereleasedbytheWrightCounty
Sheriff’sDepartmenttothelicensingauthority,includingtheCityCouncil,the
CityAdministrator,orotherCitystaffinvolvedthelicenseapprovalprocess.
ORDINANCENO.554
Beforetheinvestigationisundertaken,theapplicantmustauthorizetheWright
CountySheriff’sDepartmentbywrittenconsenttoundertaketheinvestigation.
ThewrittenconsentmustfullycomplywiththeprovisionsofMinn.Stat.Chap.
13regardingthecollection,maintenanceanduseoftheinformation.Exceptfor
thepositionssetforthinMinnesotaStatutesSection364.09,theCitywillnot
rejectanapplicantforalicenseonthebasisoftheapplicant’spriorconviction
unlessthecrimeisdirectlyrelatedtothelicensesoughtandtheconvictionisfora
felony,grossmisdemeanor,ormisdemeanorwithajailsentence.IftheCity
rejectstheapplicant'srequestonthisbasis,theCityshallnotifytheapplicantin
writingofthefollowing:
1.Thegroundsandreasonsforthedenial.
2.Theapplicantcomplaintandgrievanceproceduresetforthin
MinnesotaStatutesSection364.06.
3.Theearliestdatetheapplicantmayreapplyforthelicense.
4.Thatallcompetentevidenceofrehabilitationwillbeconsidered
uponreapplication.
Section3.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafterits
passageandpublication.Theordinanceinitsentiretyshallbepostedon
theCitywebsiteafterpublication.CopiesofthecompleteOrdinanceare
availableonlineandatMonticelloCityHallforexaminationupon
request.
ADOPTEDANDAPPROVEDFORPUBLICATIONBY theCityCounciloftheCityof
Monticello,Minnesota,this12thdayofMarch,2012.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
VOTINGINFAVOR:
VOTINGINOPPOSITION:
SUMMARYORDINANCENO.554A
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
ANORDINANCERELATINGTOCRIMINALHISTORY
BACKGROUNDINVESTIGATIONSFORAPPLICANTSFOR
CITYEMPLOYMENTANDCITYLICENSES
NOTICEISHEREBYGIVEN that,onMarch12,2012,OrdinanceNo.554was
adoptedbytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota.Duetothelengthy
natureofOrdinanceNo.554,thefollowingsummaryoftheordinancehasbeenprepared
forpublicationasauthorizedbystatelaw.
TheordinanceadoptedbytheCouncilamendstheCityCodetoprovidefor
criminalhistorybackgroundinvestigationspriortoappointingemployeesorvolunteersto
certaincitypositionsorbeforegrantingcertaincitylicenses,permitsorapprovalsto
personsconductingcertainbusinesseswithintheCity,includingliquorlicensees.The
ordinanceisrequiredfortheCitytoconductcriminalhistorybackgroundchecksina
mannerconsistentwithrequirementsinstatelaw,andtohavetheWrightCountySheriff
accessstatecriminalhistoryrecordsfornon-criminalinvestigationpurposes.Provisions
includenoticetothepersonbeinginvestigatedandproceduresifadverseappointmentor
licensingdecisionsaremadebasedontheresultsoftheinvestigation.
Aprintedcopyofthewholeordinanceisavailableforinspectionbyanypersonduring
theCity’sregularofficehours.ThecompleteordinancewillbepostedontheCity’s
websitefollowingpublication.
APPROVEDFORPUBLICATION bytheCityCounciloftheCityof
Monticello,Minnesota,this12th dayofMarch,2012.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
JeffO’NeillCityAdministrator
VOTINGINFAVOR:
VOTINGINOPPOSITION:
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
5D.ConsiderationofratifyingappointmentstotheBertramChainofLakesAdvisory
Council (AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilisaskedtoratifyappointmentstotheBertramChainofLakesAdvisory
Council,whichweremadeduringtheirlastregularmeetingonMarch3rd,2012.
TheCouncilratifiesappointmentstotheBertramChainofLakesAdvisoryCouncilin
recognitionoftheAdvisoryCouncil’srecommendingroleasrelatedtothepark.The
CityCouncilandCountyBoardofCommissionershavefullauthorityinformaldecisions
pertainingtothepark.Thefullrepresentativemake-upoftheAdvisoryCouncilis
attachedforreference.
Twoat-largeCountyresidentpositionswereopenasaresultoftheresignationofLarry
Hance(healthreasons)andthereplacementofJaniceBergstrombyMartynDibbenasthe
WrightCountyParksBoardrepresentative.Mr.Dibbenhadbeenservingintheat-large
position,whichwiththenewappointmentlefthisat-largeseatopen.
Fourapplicationswerereceivedforthetwopositionopenings.TheAdvisoryCouncil
recommendsappointmentofTomJahnkeandJimHayestofillthepositions.Mr.Jahnke
residesinBuffaloandMr.HayesisaresidentofMapleLake.
A1.BudgetImpact:None.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:None.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapproveappointmentofTomJahnkeandJimHayestotheBertram
ChainofLakesAdvisoryCouncil.
2.MotiontodenyratifyingappointmentstotheBertramChainofLakesAdvisory
Council.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffandtheBertramChainofLakesAdvisoryCouncilrecommendAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.BertramChainofLakesAdvisoryCouncilDetail
B.BertramChainofLakesAdvisoryCouncilApplications
C.CityCouncilAgenda,4/13/09
D.CityCouncilMinutes,4/13/09
Bertram Chain of Lakes
Vision to Reality
The mission of Wright County and the City of Monticello is to acquire,
develop, operate, and maintain the Bertram Chain of Lakes as a regional
park and recreation area which enriches the quality of life for our residents
and visitors alike, and preserves a natural resource for future generations.
Advisory Council Planning Mission
The public will be the primary driving force behind the master planning proc-
ess for the Bertram Chain of Lake Regional Park. The Master Plan will be a
dynamic, evolving document that will be the direct outcome of the site and
resource analysis and the public participation process.
Advisory Council Master Planning Objectives
Public involvement in the process will come from a series of public meetings
and the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council.
The Master Plan will consider the history of the area, setting, needs of sur-
rounding communities and citizens, natural and cultural resources of the site,
and reclamation issues.
The Master Plan will provide for outdoor recreation opportunities for the
public, resource management to ensure the continued protection and en-
hancement of the natural setting, and include restoration appropriate to the
park and its environment.
To ensure consistency with County and City planning objectives, policies and
implementation, the planning process will include County and City staff.
Advisory Council Guidelines
Suggestions from the public involvement process will be reviewed by the
Council to determine how they meet the vision of the park and how they can
be incorporated into the master plan.
The Council will communicate to the public the decisions made, the process
used, financial impacts and how public input affected these decisions.
The park service area within Wright County will be used as the notification
radius used to inform the public of events, meetings, proposed development,
and master plan review and to invite their participation.
The Council will provide policy makers the input received from the public
process, as well as trends, survey findings, financial impacts and other infor-
mation in a timely manner so that they may make informed decisions.
Bertram Chain of Lakes
Regional Park
Advisory Council
Structure
2 Monticello City
Council Members
2 Wright County
Commissioners
1 Wright County Parks
Advisory Board
Members
1 Monticello City
Parks Commission
Members
2 Citizens at Large
1 Monticello Township
Officer
1 Monticello School
District
Representative
1 Monticello
Community Center
Advisory Board
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
5E.ConsiderationofapprovingaMemorandumofUnderstandingbetweentheCountyof
WrightandtheCityofMonticelloregardingtheYMCA/BertramLakeRegionalPark
Project.(AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilisaskedtoratifytheformalMemorandumofUnderstandingbetween
theCountyofWrightandtheCityofMonticelloregardingtheYMCA/BertramLake
RegionalParkProject.
Thisagreementwasdirectedfordevelopmentin2006bytheCityCouncil,concurrent
withactionrelatedtodevelopmentofaletterofintenttopurchasetheYMCACamp
Manitouproperty.Recentresearchonthisdocumentrevealedthatalthoughdrafted,the
documentwasneverformallyexecuted.
ThedocumentformalizesthecurrentpartnershipbetweentheCityandCounty,under
whichthetwopartiesagreetomatch,ata50/50ratio,anyStatefundsawardedtothe
project.ThedocumentnotesthatanyacquisitionsatBertrammustbeapprovedbyboth
parties,andthatbothshallownanequal,undividedinterestinthepark.Thesetermsare
consistentwiththeoriginaldirectionoftheCityCouncilonthepark’sestablishment.
TheagreementalsoindicatesthatfutureactionbytheCityCouncilandCountyBoard
willberequiredforanydecisionsrelatingtooperationsandmaintenance.Theagreement
furtherstipulatesthataJointPowersBoardmaybeformedtoprovideoversightonsuch
matters.
TheBertramChainofLakesAdvisoryCouncilunanimouslysupportstheadoptionofthe
memorandum.
InworkingwithStatelegislatorsonbondingbillsforparkacquisition,itwasnotedthat
anexecutedagreementbetweentheCountyandtheCityisneededasdemonstrationof
bothparties’commitmenttoacquisitionandownership.Currently,SenatorKochhas
authoredandintroducedaboundingbillwhichincludesStatefundingsufficientto
acquiretheremaining551acresofpropertyatBertram,withCityandCountymatch.
Itshouldalsobenotedthatoriginaldiscussionsonthepurchaseofthefullparkincluded
theideathat,shouldalargepurchasebeundertaken(includingthatwhichmightoccuras
aresultofbondfundingthroughtheStateorthroughaCountybond),theCountywould
considerallowingtheCitytofinancesuchacquisitionthroughtheCounty.Further
discussionsonthatarrangementwillcontinuewithmembersoftheBertramPark
negotiationsteam.ThatteamcurrentlyconsistsofCountyBoardrepresentativesPat
SawatzkeandRoseThelenandCityCouncilmembersClintHerbstandGlenPosusta.
A1.BudgetImpact:None.Thisagreementisaformalizationofcurrentandpast
agreementbetweentheCityandCountyasrelatedtoacquisitionandownershipof
thepark.
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
2
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:None.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapproveaMemorandumofUnderstandingbetweentheCountyof
WrightandtheCityofMonticelloregardingtheYMCA/BertramLakeRegional
ParkProject.
2.MotiontodenyaMemorandumofUnderstandingbetweentheCountyofWright
andtheCityofMonticelloregardingtheYMCA/BertramLakeRegionalPark
Project.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.MemorandumofUnderstandingbetweentheCountyofWrightandtheCityof
MonticelloregardingtheYMCA/BertramLakeRegionalParkProject
B.CityCouncilMinutes,4/24/06
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF WRIGHT
AND THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
RE: YMCA/BERTRAM LAKE PARK PROJECT
The following is a Memorandum of Understanding between the County of Wright, (hereinafter
referred to as “County”) and the City of Monticello, (hereinafter referred to as “City”). The
purpose of this document is to establish the terms, conditions and responsibilities of the parties
relative to the acquisition of land in Monticello Township of approximately 1,200 acres in size,
for regional park purposes. In addition, the parties wish to state their intentions regarding
ownership and operation.
WHEREAS The YMCA, is the willing seller, and which owns undeveloped
real property in Monticello Township; and
WHEREAS Both the City and the County have expressed an interest in acquiring
said property for regional park purposes; and
WHEREAS A real estate appraiser has been hired to provide the value for said
property; and
WHEREAS The parties to this document wish to set out the terms and
conditions for said property;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNTY AND THE CITY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The County and the City shall cooperate in formulating a purchase for the real property
known as the “YMCA property”.
2. This agreement shall be from the date adopted by both parties. 3. For each incremental purchase an acceptable appraisal will be presented to both parties, a
purchase offer may be formulated. Said purchase offer must be approved by the
governing bodies of the County and the City before it is communicated to the present
owner. In formulating a purchase offer, both governing bodies may close meetings
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.05, Subd. 3(c).
4. Local cash match for any grant awarded for the acquisition of the real property shall be
provided as follows:
County 50 %
City 50 %
5. The real property in question, once acquired, would be owned jointly, with the County
owning a 50 % undivided interest and the City owning a 50 % undivided interest.
6. It is anticipated that the park would be managed by a fulltime operations manager, who
would be assisted by some full time staff, as well as by seasonal staff. The County would
have primary responsibility for administering programs in areas of the park with uses
customarily found in County/Regional parks. The City would have primary responsibility
for administering programs in areas of the park with uses customarily found in City parks.
The City would be responsible for scheduling and coordinating the use of the ball fields.
7. Funding for maintenance of the park would be shared by the parties, and prorated
according to the area of the park maintained.
8. Funding for park capital improvements and major infrastructure maintenance projects
would be provided as specifically agreed by the parties.
9. Funding for future land acquisition for the park would be provided according to the
agreement of the parties.
10. Each party shall be responsible for the costs related to staff time and supplies, as well as
private consultants which it devotes to the attempt to acquire this property.
11. The parties shall cooperate in providing resources related to making a purchase offer for
the property.
12. Legal representation shall be provided by the Wright County Attorney’s Office,
(hereinafter referred to as “County Attorney”) with respect to the attempt to purchase this
property. The City Attorney will review correspondence and other documents as
requested by the City. The County and the City may seek the assistance of other legal
counsel, if necessary.
13. In the event that the City and the County acquire the property in entirety, the parties
intend to adopt a formal Joint Powers Agreement to memorialize the terms and conditions
of ownership, maintenance and capital improvements of said property going forward.
Said Joint Powers Agreement would establish an appointed Joint Powers Board
responsible for governing the park.
14. The Joint Powers Park Board would be autonomous in governing the park, but would not
have taxing authority. An annual budget would need to be submitted and approved each
year by the City and the County. Funding would be provided by the parties according to
the approved budget.
15. The City agrees to indemnify and hold the County harmless from all liability, claims, or
actions that may, in any manner, result from or arise out of the City’s activities under this
Memorandum of Understanding. Likewise, the County agrees to indemnify and hold the
City harmless from all liability, claims, or actions that may, in any manner, result from or
arise out of the County’s activities under this Memorandum of Understanding.
16. This Memorandum of Understanding may be modified or amended by a written instrument
signed by representatives of both parties.
Dated: ____________________ COUNTY OF WRIGHT
_________________________________
Chairperson, County Board
_________________________________
County Coordinator
Dated: ____________________ CITY OF MONTICELLO
_________________________________
Mayor
_________________________________
City Administrator
CityCouncilAgenda:3/12/12
1
5F.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-024permittingXcelEnergytoinstall
privatesewerandwatersystemimprovements (BW)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
XcelEnergyrecentlysubmittedplansforexpandingthegunrangefacilitiesattheir
MonticelloNuclearGeneratingPlant(MNGP).Aspartoftheirgunrangeexpansion
plans,Xcelisproposingtoinstallprivatesanitarysewerandwatersupplysystem
improvements.PerCityOrdinanceTitle7,Chapter2,Section3(A),privatesewerand/or
watersystemsarenotallowedwithinCitylimitswithoutresolutionoftheCouncil.The
exactordinancelanguageisasfollows:
7-2-3:PRIVATESEWERANDWATERSYSTEMS:
(A)Itshallbeunlawfulforanypersonstoinstallprivatewatersystemorsewer
systeminthecityexceptinsuchcasesasthepublicwaterandsewersystem
arenotaccessibletothepremiseswheresuchprivatesystemsarerequested.
Todeterminewhetherornotsuchpublicwaterand/orsewersystemsare
availableforconnection,eachpersondesiringtoinstallaprivatewateror
sewersystemmustfirstmakeapplicationforconnectiontoapublicsystem.
UponresolutionoftheCouncildeterminingthatitisnotfeasibletoconnect
theapplicant'spremisestothepublicwaterorsewersystem,thenthe
applicantshallbegrantedapermittoinstallaprivatewaterand/orsewer
system.
(#4,11/24/75)
TheMNGPcurrentlyhasaprivatewatersupplywellfortheirpotablewaterneeds,and
theydrawwaterfromtheriverfortheirfireprotectionandplantcoolingneeds.The
nearestpublicwatertrunklineisunderWestRiverStreet,orapproximately0.8miles
fromthegunrangesiteasthecrowflies.Assuch,XcelEnergywouldneedtoextend
theirprivatewatersystemlinesamileorsotoconnecttotheCity’spublicwatersystem.
Inregardstosanitarysewer,MNGPiscurrentlyconnectedtoourpublicsanitarysewer
systematWestRiverStreetviaaprivateforcemainline.Connectingtheirforcemain
systemtothesanitarysewersystemproposedforthegunrangewouldalsobecost
prohibitive.
XcelEnergyisthereforerequestingthattheCityCouncilpermitthemtoinstallprivate
sanitarysewerandwatersystemimprovementsontheirsiteaspartoftheirgunrange
improvementsproject.
A.1BudgetImpact:Nobudgetimpactsareanticipatedwiththisrequest.
A.2StaffImpact:Nostaffimpactsareanticipatedwiththisrequest.
CityCouncilAgenda:3/12/12
2
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2012-024permittingXcelEnergytoinstallprivate
sewerandwatersystemimprovementswiththeirgunrangeimprovementsatthe
MNGPperCityapprovedplansandspecifications.
2.MotiontotableadoptionofResolution#2012-024permittingXcelEnergyto
installprivatesewerandwatersystemimprovementswiththeirgunrange
improvementsattheMNGPperCityapprovedplansandspecificationspending
completionofthefollowingitems:___________________________________.
3.MotiondenyingadoptionofResolution#2012-024atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommendsapprovingalternative#1oralternative#2,dependingonwhether
Councilwouldlikeadditionalinformationbeforemakingadecision.Councilshouldbe
awarethatatthetimeitiscost-effectivetodoso,theCitywillrequireMNGPtoconnect
alloftheirsewerandwaterutilitiestoourpublicutilitiessystems.However,inthe
meantimethereshouldbenonegativeimpactsassociatedwithallowingXcelEnergyto
installprivatesewerandwatersystemsontheMNGPsite,especiallygiventhesmall
scopeoftheproposedservicearea.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2012-024
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2012-024
PERMITTINGINSTALLATIONOFPRIVATESEWERANDWATERSYSTEMS
WITHAPPROVEDGUNRANGEIMPROVEMENTSATTHE
MONTICELLONUCLEARGENERATINGPLANT
WHEREAS,theMonticelloNuclearGeneratingPlant(MNGP)hassubmittedplanstotheCity
ofMonticelloforimprovementstotheirexistinggunrange;and
WHEREAS,CityOrdinance7-2-3,PrivateSewerandWaterSystems,statesthatprivatesewer
and/orwatersystemsarenotallowedwithinCitylimitswithoutresolutionoftheCityCouncil;
and
WHEREAS,itwouldnotbecost-effectiveforMNGPtoconnecttheirproposedsewerandwater
systemimprovementstotheCity’spublicutilitiessystemsatthistime;and
WHEREAS,theCitywillrequireMNGPtoconnecttheirentiresewerandwatersystemtothe
City’spublicutilitiessystemsatsuchtimethatitiscost-effectivetodoso;
NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVED,bytheCityCouncilfortheCityofMonticellothat
XcelEnergyisherebypermittedtoinstallprivatesewerandwatersystemimprovementswith
theirgunrangeimprovementsattheMNGPperCity-approvedplansandspecifications.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis12th dayofMarch,2012.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_____________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
5G.Considerationofreducingtheretainageforthe2011StreetReconstruction
Improvements,CityProjectNo.11C001 (BW/WSB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilisaskedtoauthorizereducingtheretainagebeingheldforCityProject
No.11C001from5%to2%.
The2011StreetReconstructionProjectwassubstantiallycompleteinOctober2011with
thefinalliftofpavementplacedonthestreetswithintheprojectarea.Allutilityworkfor
thisprojecthasbeeninspected,tested,andapprovedinaccordancewiththespecifications
fortheproject.TheCity’sstandardcontractdocumentsrequireaminimum5%retainage
onallpaymentsmadetothecontractorforworkcompletedontheproject.Thevalueof
theworkcompletedtodateis$1,328,010.29soanamountof$66,400.51isbeingheldas
a5%retainage.
Theremainingworktobecompletedincludespavementstripingandminorpunchlist
items.Giventhesmallamountofworkremainingontheproject,RedstoneConstruction,
Inc.hasrequestedareductionoftheretainageonthecontractfrom5%to2%ofthevalue
oftheworkcompleted.Approvaloftheretainagereductionwouldthereforelowerthe
retainageamountto$26,560.21,areductionof$39,840.30.
IfCouncilapprovesthereductionasrequestedtheCitywillpayRedstoneConstruction,
Inc.theamountof$39,840.30.Theretainedamountof$26,560.21isadequatetocover
allworkremainingontheproject.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethereductionofthe5%retainedamount($66,400.51)to2%
($26,560.21)andauthorizepaymenttoRedstoneConstruction,Inc.
2.Motiontodenytherequestedreductionatthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.Theprojectissubstantiallycompletewithpavement
stripingandminorpunchlistitemstobecompletedinthespringof2012beforefinal
acceptanceandcloseoutofthecontract.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
None
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
5H.ConsiderationofapprovingenhancementrequestsforGoodFridayandapolicy
adjustmentofbenefiteligiblehoursforpart-timeemployees (JO/TE)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtoconsideraddingGoodFridayasapaidholidayandconsider
changingthethresholdforprovidingbenefitstoparttimeemployeesfrom25to30hours
perweek.Thisrequeststemsfromourongoingefforttomaintainanexcellentwork
environment.Recently,DepartmentHeadswereaskedtosubmitideasthat,if
implemented,wouldcontributetowardworksatisfaction.Aspartofthisprocess,
DepartmentHeadsmetwiththeirstaffoncollectingideasforreviewbythegroup.The
ideasgeneratedwerethenratedas“low,”“moderate,”or“high”priorityforeach
department.
ThePersonnelCommitteemettoreviewtheitemsandprovidedrecommendationsfor
follow-up.Mostoftheitemsrevieweddidnotinvolvesignificantcostandwillbe
addressedatanupcomingDepartmentHeadmeeting.Acompletesummaryofthese
itemsandfollowupactionwillbeforthcoming.However,twooftheideasdidrequire
Councilactionbecauseonewastimesensitiveandbothinvolvedadjustmentstothe
employeebenefitspackage.
Asaresultofthediscussion,itisproposedbythePersonnelCommitteetoaddGood
Friday(April6th)asanadditionalpaidholidayfor2012andalsotoincreasethepart-time
hoursrequirementtoearnpart-timebenefitsfrom25perweekto30hoursperweek.
Theadditionalpaidholidayforfull-timestaffwouldallowtheclosureofCityHall,
PublicWorks,andFiberNetHeadEnd.Thefollowingessentialofficeswouldremain
openforbusiness:DMV,FNMbusinessoffice,MCC,andHi-WayLiquors.Officesthat
remainopenwouldbestaffedwithpart-timeemployeeswherepossible.Anyfull-time
employeesscheduledtoworkontheholidaywouldbeallowedtotakeanotherdayoffas
afloatingholiday.
Theideatoincreasethehoursrequirementstoearnpart-timebenefits(50%full-time
vacationand50%full-timeholiday)wasanemployeeandmanagementinitiative.
Increasingthehoursrequirementforpart-timebenefitstatusallowsmanagementgreater
flexibilityinschedulingandalsohelpstomaintainpart-timeemployeeswhomaybe
lookingformorehours.Therearecurrentlytwoemployeeswhoarepart-timebenefited
status,andwewouldrecommendtheybegrandfatheredinunderthecurrenthour’s
requirement.
A1.BudgetImpact:None.Althoughthereisnodirectadditionalcost,itremoves
onedayofproductivitywiththeGoodFridayholiday.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:None
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
2
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
Decision1
1.MotiontoapproverecognizingGoodFridayasapaidholidayfor2012.
2.MotiontodenyrecognizingGoodFridayasapaidholidayfor2012.
Decision2
1.Motiontoapprovethechangeinpolicylanguageincreasingthehours
requirementforpart-timebenefitedstafffrom25to30hoursperweek(and
grandfatherinthetwoemployeescurrentlyeligible).
2.Motiontodenyincreasingthehoursrequirementforpart-timebenefitedstaffat
thistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
ThePersonnelCommitteeandCitystaffrecommendsapprovingbothdecisions.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Reviseddefinitionofpart-timebenefitedstatus
PolicyLanguage
Part-TimeBenefitedStatus
VacationLanguage
Current:
Employeesclassifiedaspermanentpart-timewhohaveworkedanaverageof25hoursperweek
ormoreforthepastsixmonthsshallbeentitledtoaccruevacationleaveattherateof50%ofthe
vacationscheduleforeachyearofservice.
Revised:
Employeesclassifiedaspermanentpart-timewhohaveworkedanaverageof 30 hoursperweek
ormoreforthepastsixmonthsshallbeentitledtoaccruevacationleaveattherateof50%ofthe
vacationscheduleforeachyearofservice.
InsuranceLanguage
Current:
Full-timeregularandpermanentpart-timeemployeeswhoaverage25hoursormoreperweek
shallbeeligibletoapplyforemployeeanddependentinsurancebenefits.
Revised:
Full-timeregularandpermanentpart-timeemployeeswhoaverage 30 hoursormoreperweek
shallbeeligibletoapplyforemployeeanddependentinsurancebenefits.
CityCouncilAgenda:3/26/2012
1
5I.Considerationofapprovingpurchaseoftelevisionsanddigitalsignsoftware,
includingtheinstallationofequipmentandsoftware,withfundingfromCable
Commissionfranchisefeereimbursements.(KB/JO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
AttheFebruary27,2012Councilmeeting,theCouncilwasaskedtoapprovetheuseof
CableCommissionFranchisefeestopurchasedigitalsignageandthehighdefinition
monitors.TheCounciltabledthismotiontotheMarch12,2012Councilmeeting,
requestingmoreinformationoncostsforthisprogram.Asnotedpreviously,thisisa
marketinginitiativebroughtforwardfromtheCrossPromotionalTeam(CPT)toenhance
consumerawarenessofvariousservicesandactivities,whicheachCitydepartment
provides,usingdigitalsignageandmonitors.
Aswereviewthedigitalsignageoptionsthatcouldbeusedinthisinitiative,weare
findingthatcarefulandthoroughresearchisneededtoensurethatwebringforwardthe
correctequipment,software,installation,etc.forthisprojecttoaccomplishtheultimate
goalsofthisprogram.ThesegoalsaretoprovidedigitalsignageattheCity’senterprise
locationsthatprovidegeneralCitymessagesbutcanalsobemodifiedtoprovidesite
specificmessagesaswell.WealsoexpecttoutilizethesemessagesonaFiberNet
channelfurthermarketingourCityfacilities,servicesandeventstothegeneralpublic.
Wedorealizethatthereisastrongdesiretohavethisprogramavailablesoonerrather
thanlaterandwillcontinuetokeepthatinmindaswecontinueourresearch.
A1.BudgetImpact:Notfullyknownatthistime.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Notfullyknownatthistime.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontotablethisitemtoatimetobedeterminedbytheCPTwhenthis
programisfullyready.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
None
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
7.ContinuationofPublicHearing-ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#552
amendingthe2012FeeSchedulewithadjustmentstowaterandsewerrates (TK)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityrevieweditswaterandsewerratesataworkshoponFebruary27 th.Therates
aregenerallysetataleveltoassuretheyarecoveringoperationsandsomecapital
replacementofthosesystems.Thisistypicallycompletedpriortothefirstquarterbilling
cyclewhichismailedinApril.
AnotherfactortoconsiderwhensettingnewratesisthattheCitycurrentlypaysthedebt
onthewastewatertreatmentplantfromtheseweraccessfundandataxlevy.For2012,
theCitylevied$500,000andtookout$450,000fromtheSewerAccessFund.However,
basedoncurrentrevenuesintotheSewerAccessFundandtherequiredbondpayments,
theSewerAccessFundwillrunoutofcashintheyear2014andthebondwillneedtobe
repaidentirelyfromataxlevyoracombinationoftaxlevyandsewerrates.
TheWaterAccessFundandSewerAccessFundalsopayaportionofthe2005A
ImprovementBond.Withthescheduled2012transferfromtheWaterAccessFundto
the2005ImprovementBondFund,theWaterAccessFundwillbeoutofcashuntil
additionalwatertrunkandaccessfeescanbecollectedonnewdevelopments.TheWater
FundcanloantheAccessFundthecashortakeoverthedebtpaymentinwhichcasethe
debtpaymentshouldbecalculatedintothewaterrates.
Anotherfactor,asyoucansee,istheratescurrentlydonotcovermuchofthe
depreciationofsystemassets.IftheCitydoesnotcoveratleastaportionofthe
depreciationnow,whensystemassetsarereplacedtheratescouldhavetobeincreased
significantlyatthattime,ortheCitywillneedtoissuedebtandbuildthosedebt
paymentsintofuturerates.TheCity’s5-yearcapitalimprovementplanlists$812,000of
improvementstobepaidfromthewaterfundand$6,172,600fromthesewerfundover
thenextfiveyears.Thesewerfundimprovementsinclude$4,500,000ofimprovements
tothewastewatertreatmentplant.
Forwaterrevenues,anotherfactoristheweather.Lastspringandsummerwerewetand
mostpeoplewerenotwateringoutsideuntilthefall.Reducedoutdoorwateringwill
resultinreducedcostsandreducedrevenuesfortheCity.
NextfactortoconsideriswhethertheCitywouldconsiderbillingforotherservices,
whicharenoweithernotfundedorfundedthroughthepropertytaxlevy,suchasstorm
waterdrainagemaintenanceorimprovements,garbage/recyclingservices,orsomeother
service.
Finally,CargillKitchensSolutionsusesover15,000,000gallonsofwaterandsewera
quarter,soarateincreaseaffectsthemgreatly.Also,asanindustrialuser,Cargillis
billednotonlyforwaterandsewerbutalsoBODandTSSloadingintothesystem.Last
yeartheCitydidworkcloselywithCargilltoarriveatanindustrialratestructure.
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
2
AttheFebruary27th workshop,staffpresentedratesataleveltogenerateaboutthesame
amountofgrossprofitandnetlossafterdepreciationas2011.Theresultsshowedthat
thewaterratesneedtobeincreased8%andsewerratesincreased12%for2012.Atthis
leveltherateswouldcoververylittleoftheassetreplacement.
Attheworkshop,Councilrequestedthatstafflookatwhattherateswouldneedtobeto
coverdepreciationandthefuturewastewatertreatmentplant(WWTP)bondpayment.
Tocoverhalfthedepreciation,therateswouldneedtobeincreasedanadditional20%for
waterand26%forsewer.Tocoverthe$450,000debtpaymentthattheSewerAccess
Fundiscurrentlypaying,thiswouldrequireanadditional28%increaseinthesewerrate.
Basedoncurrentbudget,lastyear’srevenues,andpossiblefuturedebtandcapital
expenses,staffwouldrecommendawaterrateincreaseof10%andsewerrateincreaseof
15%.Whilethesearetherecommendedrateincreases,staffunderstandstheimpactthat
rateincreaseshaveontheresidentsandbusinessesofMonticello.IfCouncilwereto
considersomeotherrateincrease,staffwouldrecommendthattheincreasenotbelower
than8%forwaterand12%forsewerasoriginallyproposed.
Whilethepercentageincreasemaysoundlarge,theincreasetoresidentscanbesmall
dependingonwaterusebecausewearedealingwithlownumberstobeginwith.
Attachedisaspreadsheetusing5differentwaterconsumptionsandtheeffectsthatthe
10%waterrateand15%sewerrateincreasewouldhaveontheseaccounts.Thecurrent
waterusageandbillwastakenfromtheOctober2011billingcyclewhichisforservice
forJuly,August,andSeptember.Asyoucansee,someonewhoreceivestheminimum
billwouldseeanincreaseof$3.98perquarteror$15.92fortheyear.Thehomethat
used80,036gallonsofwaterwasahomethatwateredduringthequarteranditssewer
ratewasbasedonwinterconsumption,whichisatamuchlowerwaterusage.Thathome
wouldseea$16.68increaseforthequarterand,basedonoutdoorwateruse,wouldsee
anincreaseoflessthan$50.00fortheyear.Pleaserefertothecomparisonbillings
shownonthelastpageofthesupportingdataforotherexamples.
ForCargillKitchenSolutionstheproposedrateincreasewouldincreasetheirbillfrom
$426,375.18in2011to$486,274.39,oranincreaseof$59,899.21basedonwaterand
sewerusagein2011.
A1.BudgetImpact:TherateswillaffecttheamountofrevenuetheCitywill
generatefromwaterandsewerchargesin2012andwouldalsohavelong-term
effectsonfutureratechangesbasedonsystemneeds.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Oncethenewratesareestablished,thereissomestaff
timetoimportthenewratesintotheutilitybillingsystem.Becauseofthetimeit
willtaketoimportintothebillingsystemandhavetheratesincludedwiththe
firstquarterbillingcycle,therateincreasecannotwaituntiltheMarch26th
meeting.
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
3
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#552amendingthe2012FeeSchedulewithawater
rateincreaseof10%andasewerrateincreaseof15%.
2.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#552amendingthe2012FeeSchedulewithan
alternativewaterrateand/orsewerrateincrease.
3.Motiontonotapproveawaterrateandsewerrateincreaseatthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffsupportsAlternative#1toapproveawaterrateincreaseof10%andasewerrate
increaseof15%duetobudgetedexpensesandpossiblefuturedebtandcapitalexpenses.
However,ifthisisnotthedesireoftheCouncil,staffwouldrecommendanincreaseofat
least8%forthewaterratesand12%forthesewerratesfor2012.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Ordinance#552-asproposedunderAlternate#1
Ratesheetsdemonstratingtheseoptions:
coveringoperations
coveringoperationsand½ofdepreciation
coveringoperationsand½ofWWTPdebtpayment
recommendedrateincrease
Comparisonofcurrentandproposedrateson5differenthomesbasedonwateruse
ORDINANCENO.552
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
ANORDINANCEREVISINGTHE2012FEESCHEDULE
WITHAMENDEDWATER&SEWERRATES
NOTICEISHEREBYGIVEN that,onMarch13,2012,OrdinanceNo.552wasadoptedbythe
CityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota,creatingthefollowingrevisionstothe2012
FeeSchedule.
Section1.TheFeeSchedulecategory,SanitarySewer,oftheMonticelloCityCode,Title20
shallbeamendedasfollows:
Sewerratefeestructurechanges:
SewerRates:1st 3740gallons$19.25minimum
Over3740gallons$3.45per748gallons
SewerRates-SpecialCases:$23.00Xnumberofpeopleinhousehold
IndustrialSewerRates:AllUsage$2.07/748gallons+salestax
BOD5:$0.368/lb.+salestax
TSS:$0.506/lb.+salestax
Section2.TheFeeSchedulecategory,Water,oftheMonticelloCityCode,Title20shallbe
amendedasfollows:
Waterratefeestructurechanges:
ResidWater:1st 3740gallons$15.73minimum
3741-29920gallons$1.05/748gallons
29921-100,000gallons$1.21/748gallons
Over100,000gallons$1.35/748gallons
Comm/IndustrialWaterRate,Mtr1
AllUsage$1.25/748gallons+salestax
IrrigationWaterRateforResid,Twnhms&Comm:(ifmeteredseparatelyoncommercial
properties,nominimumbaserateisapplied)
1st 3740gallons$15.73minimum+salestax
3741-29920gallons$1.05/748gallons+salestax
29921-100,000gallons$1.21/748gallons+salestax
Over100,000gallons$1.35/748gallons+salestax
Section3.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassage
andpublication.TheordinanceinitsentiretyshallbepostedontheCitywebsite
afterpublication.CopiesofthecompleteOrdinanceareavailableonlineandat
MonticelloCityHallforexaminationuponrequest.
ORDINANCENO.552
ADOPTEDANDAPPROVEDFORPUBLICATION bytheCityCounciloftheCityof
Monticello,Minnesota,this12thdayofMarch,2012.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
JeffO’NeillCityAdministrator
VOTINGINFAVOR:
VOTINGINOPPOSITION:
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
8.PublicHearing-ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-025authorizing
submissionofaMinnesotaDepartmentofNaturalResourcesOutdoorRecreation
GrantapplicationforaproposedPhaseVPropertyAcquisitionattheBertram
ChainofLakesRegionalPark (AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
Aspartofcontinuedeffortstoaccomplishthecompleteacquisitionofpropertyatthe
BertramChainofLakesRegionalPark,theCityCouncilisaskedtoapprovesubmission
ofaCity/CountyapplicationtotheDNR’s2012OutdoorRecreationgrantprogram.As
partofthegrantsubmission,apublichearingisrequired.
Theapplicationfor2012OutdoorRecreationgrantfundingisintendedforacquisitionof
Parcel1ofthepark.Parcel1isaprimarycomponentintheactiverecreationalareaof
thepark.TheactiveplayareaisintendedtofulfilltheCity’sactiveandathleticfield
needsasidentifiedinthe2011ParkandPathwayPlanand2008ComprehensivePlan.
TheOutdoorRecreationGrantprogramisaDepartmentofNaturalResourcesgrant
programdesignedtoassistlocalgovernmentsinacquiringparklandandindevelopingor
redevelopingparkland.ApplicationstotheprogramaredueMarch31st,2012.Grant
awardsareexpectedtobemadeinsummer2012,withanexpirationofawardgenerally
occurring24monthslater.
Thefollowinginformationisrequiredtobepresentedduringthehearing:
Projectscopeandtypeofactivities
Implementationschedule
Overallcostandproposedfunding
Costtobeassessedtocommunityresidents
Associatedprojectcosts
Theabovecomponentsaredetailedinthereportbelow.
ProjectScope
TheBertramChainofLakesRegionalParkisa1,200acreregionalparkblending
opportunitiesforpassivenaturalrecreationexperienceswithactiveathleticand
recreationalplayareas.TheparkisidentifiedinboththeCityofMonticelloandWright
County’sComprehensivePlans.
AmasterplanhasbeendevelopedfortheBertramChainofLakesRegionalPark
includingbothathleticandnatural-resourcebasedrecreationalfacilities.TheBertram
ChainofLakesAdvisoryCouncil,therepresentativebodyestablishedforguidingthe
park’smasterplanning,hastakeninputonactivitiesandprogramsthroughaseriesof
publicmeetingsandsurveys.Thisinputservedasthebasisforthedevelopmentofa
masterconceptplanforthefullregionalpark.Theconceptplansforboththelargerpark
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
2
andtheathleticcomplexhavebeenadoptedaspartoftheCityofMonticello’sPark&
PathwayPlan.
TheacquisitionproposedwiththeOutdoorRecreationapplicationincludesthepurchase
of40.17acresofproperty(Parcel1)whichwillbedevelopedforactiverecreationaluse.
TheparceliscurrentlyownedbytheYMCAofMinneapolisandSt.Paulandis
leased/rentedforagriculturalpurposes.Atthistime,theCityofMonticello,in
conjunctionwithprojectpartnerWrightCounty,isseeking onlytheacquisition ofthe
subjectpropertyaspartofthelargeracquisitionprocessforthe1,200acrepark.
The40.17acreswillbethefuturesiteoftheprimaryaccesstotheBertramChainof
LakesRegionalAthleticComplex.Theathleticcomplexmasterplanincludessoftball,
baseball,soccerandlacrossefields.Thecomplexwillalsoincludeparkingareasto
supportthefields,restroomfacilities,concessionbuildings,aplayground,andopenplay
areas.Theathleticcomplexplanwasdevelopedbasedontheinputoftheschooldistrict,
numerousathleticorganizations,andthegeneralpublic.Theplanwasfurtherrefined
basedontheexperienceandknowledgeofalandscapearchitectworkingprobonoon
behalfoftheproject.
Aparticularstrengthofthemasterplanfortheparkistheconnectionbetweenthenatural
resourcespresentattheparkandtheactiverecreationareas.Thegoalistocreatethe
opportunityforinteractionbetweenusersoftheregionalathleticcomplexandthenatural
park.Theplanalsoaccountsforneededbufferingbetweenthehigherintensityactive
usesandthelowerintensitynaturalresourceuses.
AnimportantcomponentoftheOutdoorRecreationGrantistheapplicant’sabilityto
supportenvironmentallyconsciousparkdevelopment.Theopportunitytoreinforce
sustainabilityandtheconnectionbetweenpeopleandtheirenvironmentispresentinthe
masterplanforthepark.TheCityofMonticelloandWrightCountywillthereforestrive
toaffectthemasterplaninanenergyefficientandenvironmentallyresponsiblemanner.
Consistentwiththeoriginalmemorandumofunderstanding,WrightCountyandtheCity
ofMonticellowilljointlyownandoperatetheBertramChainofLakesRegionalPark.
Bothwillplanandbudgetforon-goingimprovementsandmaintenance.Thepartnership
betweenthetwoentitiesfurtherstrengthensthetiebetweenthenaturalandactiveareasof
thepark.Decisionspertainingtoimprovements,operations,andmaintenancewillbethe
objectoffutureindependentactionsbytheCityofMonticelloandWrightCounty.
ImplementationSchedule
Atthepresenttime,theCityandCountyarefocusedontherealizationoffullacquisition
oftheregionalpark.Thisgrantisthereforewrittentosupportonlytheacquisitionofthe
40.17acresknownasParcel1andnotactualparkdevelopment.However,ifsuccessful
inthisandfutureOutdoorRecreationgrantapplications,theCityandCountywill
proceeddirectlytoplanningforphaseddevelopmentoftheathleticfieldareawiththe
goalofprovidingdirectaccesstoopenplayareaswithinthreeyears,asrequiredbythe
grant.
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
3
Asacquisitionofallparcelswithinthefullparkboundarynearscompletion,theCityof
MonticelloandWrightCountywillembarkonadetailedfeasibilitystudyfortheathletic
complexarea.Themasterplandevelopedasaresultofdetailedneedsassessmentand
publicinputwillserveasthebasisforthefeasibilitystudy.Thefinalstudywillinclude
thefollowingcomponents:
Detailedenvironmentalanalysis
Fielddevelopmentcostandphasing
Facilitydevelopmentcostandphasing
Capitalplanning
o Phasedfundingoptions
o Fullbuild-outfundingoption
Operationsandmaintenanceframework
ADAintegrationandcompliance
Activeandnaturalareatransitions
Sponsorshipinvolvementandcost-sharingstructure
OverallCostandProposedFunding
ThetotalcostforacquisitionofParcel1is$1,004,250.TheOutdoorRecreationGrantis
a50%matchgrantprogram.Ifawardedthefull50%offunding,theCityandCounty
wouldbeaskedtoconsidercommitting$502,125.00combined,or$251,062.50each.
Inthepast,theCityhasfundedgrantmatchesfromtwosources,theParkDedication
FundandtheConsolidatedBondFund.Atthepresenttime,theParkDedicationFund
hasazerobalanceandanyfuturededicationfeespaidintothefundwillrepayaprior
BertramParkacquisitionmadethroughtheuseoftheConsolidatedBondFund.(The
mostrecentmatchfundingapprovaldidnotrequirerepaymentofthefund.)
Assuch,matchfundingforasuccessfulOutdoorRecreationgrantwillagainneedto
comefromanalternatesource,suchastheConsolidatedBondFund.TheCityCouncil
hasalsoindicatedthatproceedsfromthesaleofCity-ownedpropertymaybedirected
towardsfutureparkacquisitionsasanoption.
Futuredevelopmentcostsfortheathleticcomplexproposedforthesitewillbeidentified
viathefeasibilityreportabove,aswillfundingoptions.
CosttobeAssessedtoCommunityResidents
Previousacquisitionshaveincludedno advalorum funding.Additionally,ithasbeen
publiclystatedbytheCouncilthatitistheirintentthatno advalorum fundsbeusedfor
futureacquisitionofparklandattheBertramChainofLakes.Noindividualproperty
assessmentshavebeenleviedtocommunityresidentsforpastBertramParkacquisitions
andnoCouncilactionhasbeenmadetodirectanysuchfutureassessmentsfor
acquisition.
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
4
Thefeasibilitystudyforparkdevelopmentwillidentifyallfundingoptionsforpark
development,includingthepotentialforcostsassessmentstocommunityresidentsand/or
referendum.
AssociatedProjectCosts
CostsassociatedwiththeacquisitionofParcel1willincludethestated$251,062.50City
matchforparcelacquisition,plusappraisal,titleandclosingcosts.
A1.BudgetImpact:Notedabove.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:StaffimpactsdirectlyrelatedtoCouncilactiononthis
itemincludegrantwritingandpreparationestimatedat8-10hours.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2012-025supportinganOutdoorRecreationGrant
applicationbytheCityofMonticelloonbehalfoftheCityofMonticelloand
WrightCounty.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2012-025supportinganOutdoor
RecreationGrantapplicationbytheCityofMonticelloonbehalfoftheCityof
MonticelloandWrightCounty.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.TheOutdoorRecreationgrantprogramis
currentlytheonlygrantprogramapplicableforStatefundingofParcel1and2of
BertramPark.SubmissionofanapplicationforacquisitionofParcel1isconsistentwith
thestatedgoalsoutlinedinthe2008ComprehensivePlan,theadopted2011Parkand
PathwayPlanandtheadoptedCapitalImprovementPlan.
Ifawardedgrantfundingthroughtheprogram,Councilwillbeaskedinasubsequent
decisiontomatchfunding.Atthattime,Councilmaychoosetodenyawardandelectnot
toproceedwithacquisition.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.Resolution#2012-025
B.OutdoorRecreationGrantManual
C.BertramChainofLakesProjectAcquisitionArea
D.2012BertramChainofLakesFundingTable
E.MasterPlan,BertramChainofLakesRegionalPark
F.MasterPlan,BertramChainofLakesRegionalParkAthleticComplex
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2012-025
SUPPORTINGA2012MINNESOTADEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCES
OUTDOORRECREATIONGRANTAPPLICATIONFORAPROPOSED
PHASEVPROPERTYACQUISITIONATTHEBERTRAMCHAINOFLAKES
REGIONALPARK
WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellodesirestosubmitanapplicationfora2012MNDepartment
ofNaturalResourcesOutdoorRecreationGrantforthepurposeofaPhaseVproperty
acquisitionattheBertramChainofLakesRegionalPark;and
WHEREAS,theCityCounciloftheCityofMonticelloconsideredandapprovedthisactionata
PublicHearingheldonMarch12,2012,wherethefollowinginformationwaspresentedas
relatedtothegrantapplication:
Projectscopeandtypeofactivities
Implementationschedule
Overallcostandproposedfunding
Costtobeassessedtocommunityresidents
Associatedprojectcosts
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticelloshallactaslegalsponsor
fortheprojectcontainedintheOutdoorRecreation,RegionalParkand/orParkLegacy
ApplicationtobesubmittedonMarch13,2012andthattheMayorandCityAdministratorofthe
CityofMonticelloareherebyauthorizedtoapplytotheDepartmentofNaturalResourcesfor
fundingofthisprojectonbehalfoftheCityofMonticello;and
BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticellohasthelegalauthoritytoapplyfor
financialassistance,andfinancialcapabilitytomeetthematchrequirementandensureadequate
construction,operation,maintenanceandreplacementoftheproposedprojectforitsdesignlife;
and
BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticellohasnotincurredanydevelopment
costsdescribedonItem5bandhasnotenteredintoawrittenpurchaseagreementtoacquirethe
propertydescribedonItem5a;and
BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thatuponapprovalofitsapplicationbythestate,theCityof
MonticellomayenterintoanagreementwiththeStateofMinnesotafortheabove-referenced
project,andthattheCityofMonticellocertifiesthatitwillcomplywithallapplicablelawsand
regulationsasstatedinthegrantagreementincludingdedicatingtheparkpropertyforoutdoor
recreationusesintoperpetuity;and
BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheCityAdministratoroftheCityofMonticelloishereby
authorizedtoexecutesuchagreementsasarenecessarytoimplementtheprojectonbehalfofthe
applicant.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis12th dayofMarch,2012.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_____________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CERTIFICATION
STATEOFMINNESOTA
COUNTYOFWRIGHT
IherebycertifythattheforegoingisatrueandcorrectcopyofResolution#2012-025
dulypassed,adoptedandapprovedbytheMonticelloCityCouncilattheirscheduledmeetingon
March12,2012,andrecordedinminutesofsaidmeeting.
____________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
NotaryPublic:_______________________________
Date:___________________________
(STAMP)
OR December 2011
1
Outdoor Recreation Grant Program
Program Manual
MN Department of Natural Resources
OR December 2011
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROGRAM INTRODUCTION
Program Purpose
Funding
Grant Awards and Match Requirements
Eligible Applicants
Eligible Projects
Eligible Recreation Facilities
Eligible Recreation Support Facilities
Ineligible Facilities and Costs
II. THE APPLICATION PROCESS
Application Information
Appraisal Requirements
Competitive Review and Selection Process
Award of Funds
Grants and Public Information
III. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
Land Retention Requirements
Reporting Requirements
Monitoring Requirement
Closeout Procedures
Acknowledgment Sign
Availability to Users
IV. CONTACT INFORMATION
OR December 2011
3
I. Program Information
The Outdoor Recreation Grant Program assists local governments in acquiring parkland and
developing or redeveloping outdoor recreation facilities. Applications must be submitted by
March 31 to be eligible for funding assistance for the current year. Applicants are eligible to
receive more than one grant.
FUNDING
The program finances projects using federal funds through the Land and Water Conservation
Fund (LAWCON). Historically, some state dollars authorized by the Minnesota State Legislature
have been available. The amount of grant dollars available for distribution each year varies.
Applications are solicited in advance of the actual appropriation to ensure that projects are ready
to start after the funding becomes available.
GRANT AWARDS AND MATCH REQUIREMENTS
Grant awards are typically for 50 percent of the total eligible project costs. The remaining 50
percent "local share" can consist of can consist of cash or the value of materials, labor and
equipment usage provided by the local sponsor or by local donations or any combination thereof.
Costs must be incurred and paid for before reimbursement can be made. Grant agreements
generally expire within 24 months and projects must be completed by then.
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS: Cities, counties, townships and recognized tribal governments.
(Tribal governments are not eligible for grants funded by state appropriations.)
Note: The applicant must be the current or intended owner and manager of the property to be
acquired or developed. Multi-organization collaboration is not required for this program.
ELIGIBLE PROJECTS:
* Acquisition of land for future development of outdoor recreation facilities. Recreation
facilities must be developed within three years from the date of acquisition.
* Development, redevelopment or rehabilitation of outdoor recreation facilities on land
already owned by the applicant. The applicant must own the land.
* A combination of land acquisition and development, redevelopment or rehabilitation of
outdoor recreation facilities.
OR December 2011
4
ELIGIBLE RECREATION FACILITIES: One or more of the following facilities must be
included in a proposed project.
- Boat/Canoe Access Sites
- Campgrounds
- Fishing Piers/Shore Fishing Areas
- Ice/In-Line Skating Rinks/Parks
- Nature Study/Observation Areas
- Picnic Shelters
- Playgrounds
- Sports Fields and Courts
- Swimming Beaches and Outdoor Pools
- Trails (non-motorized internal park trails)
ELIGIBLE RECREATION SUPPORT FACILITIES: The following facilities are also eligible
for funding as part of a grant application that contains at least one facility from the eligible
recreation facilities list above.
- Change Houses, Restrooms, Shower Buildings and Warming Houses
- Fencing, Lighting and Signs
- Landscaping and Natural Area Restoration
- Park Roads and Parking Areas (may not exceed 40% of the total project cost)
- Permanent Benches, Seats, Drinking Fountains, Grills, Picnic Tables, Trash
Receptacles and Fire Pits
- Walkways
INELIGIBLE FACILITIES AND COSTS: Ineligible facilities or costs are those items that
cannot be funded with an Outdoor Recreation Grant or included as part of the local match
requirement. The following list includes common types of ineligible facilities. A determination
of eligibility will be made by the Department of Natural Resources with final approval by the
Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources.
- Administrative Expenses/ Design and Engineering in excess of 10% of the Total
Project Cost.
- Concession-only Buildings
- Decorative Fountains, Statues and Plaques
- Dredging, Water Impoundments and Dams
- Facilities not available for general public use
- Golf Courses
- Indoor Recreational Facilities (ie: ice arenas, enclosed swimming pools, etc.)
- Land already in public ownership
- Legal Fees
- Motorized Trails
- Non Permanent Skate Park Ramps and Equipment
- Press Boxes
- Sewer to Campsites
- Shooting Ranges
OR December 2011
5
II. The Application Process
To receive an application, complete and return an Application Request Form. This can be
completed online or you can submit by mail or e-mail. We urge applicants to submit the request
form no later January 31st to ensure adequate time to complete your grant application. This will
allow adequate time to meet certain application requirements, such as holding a public hearing,
having the project reviewed for any needed permits, completion of an appraisal, etc.
After submitting the Application Request Form, the application forms will be sent to you.
Completed applications sent by mail must be postmarked by March 31st. Electronic
submissions, such as a .pdf file attached to email, must be received by March 31st. This
program is very competitive. Staff members are available to discuss your project or review
application materials. You are encouraged to submit any draft application or materials by March
1st if you would like staff to provide comments.
APPRAISAL REQUIREMENTS
The application must include a self-contained appraisal report for land to be acquired. Appraisals
must be performed by a qualified licensed appraiser and meet the Uniform Appraisal Standards
for Federal Land Acquisition (UASFLA). The appraisal must include the DNR as an intended
user and the landowner or designated representative must be given an opportunity to accompany
the appraiser during the inspection of the property. Appraisals must have an effective date within
13 months of the application deadline.
Appraisals will be reviewed by the state to ensure that they meet applicable standards. If the
appraisal is not accepted, the applicant will be contacted for additional clarification or
modification. If you or the appraiser have any questions, please contact the program staff
assigned to your area prior to completing the appraisal assignment.
THE COMPETITIVE REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS
The program is competitive and requires a review and selection process to make funding
determinations and awards. The review and selection process will take place after March 31, and
funding announcements will be made in summer. Completed applications received after the
deadline will not be eligible for funding consideration. Program staff will review applications
and, if necessary, a site visit will be conducted.
Minnesota’s 2008-2012 State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan
The 2008-2012 State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) is Minnesota’s outdoor
recreation policy plan. This plan was developed with the input of Minnesota outdoor and natural
resource leaders. It establishes outdoor recreation priorities for Minnesota to assist outdoor
recreation and natural resource managers, the state legislature, and the executive branch in
decision-making about the state’s outdoor recreation system and sets out criteria for awarding
grants consistent with these identified priorities. A majority of the review and selection process
will focus on guidelines outlined in the 2008-2012 SCORP. Applications are assessed to ensure
that the proposed project is consistent with priorities established in the SCORP document.
OR December 2011
6
The SCORP priorities for Minnesota outdoor recreation selection guidelines are focused on three
of the four strategies addressed in the Minnesota’s 2008-2012 State Comprehensive Outdoor
Recreation Plan. These strategies support the overall goal to increase participation in outdoor
recreation by all Minnesotans and visitors.
Strategy 1: Acquire, protect and restore Minnesota’s natural resource base on which outdoor
recreation depends. This includes obtaining prime outdoor recreation areas throughout the state
prior to anticipated land use changes.
Focus areas: Acquisition, protection or restoration of land or other natural resources that will
provide or enhance public outdoor recreation opportunities and/or located in an area of rapid
population growth; acquisition of potential prime outdoor recreation areas that may otherwise be
threatened by anticipated land use changes; acquisition of land in areas that protect water quality;
and/or acquisition of land in areas that protect key threatened habitats. Also considered will be
whether the applicant has adopted programs to evaluate, regulate, fund and provide incentives for
land and natural resource protection.
Strategy 2: Develop and maintain a sustainable and resilient outdoor recreation infrastructure.
Focus areas: Redevelopment, renovation or rehabilitation of current infrastructure, including
improvements for safety, accessibility and energy efficiency. In addition, projects that result in
sustaining the environmental infrastructure, such as water resources, native habitat, plants,
animals, etc.
Strategy 3: Promote increased outdoor recreation participation through targeted programming
and outreach.
Focus areas: Projects that result in more opportunities to participate with peers and family in
nature-based outdoor recreation experiences through schools, youth programs, etc., for young
people, people from diverse cultural communities or new immigrant communities and seniors. In
addition, projects that help support nature education initiatives to ensure “no child left inside”
address constraints to outdoor recreation such as economic issues, facility design, public
awareness, safety or security issues and/or provide better access to outdoor recreation areas for
people for whom limited mobility, cost, distance from recreation areas or other factors restrict
participation.
The complete SCORP document is available in the Grants category of the DNR website at
www.mndnr.gov.
Additional review components:
The review will then assess the design of the proposed project and existing park facilities. Project
design should be compatible with the physical characteristics of the site, consistent with
generally accepted engineering and architectural design standards, in accordance with
accessibility standards and minimize risk to the health and safety of users. In addition to the
design, the review will look at the commitment of the applicant to accomplish the proposed
project and to protect and preserve the funded recreation facility. This commitment is assessed
through measures such as whether adequate operation and maintenance costs have been
developed for the proposed project and if the applicant has committed some of its own resources
to the project.
OR December 2011
7
AWARD OF FUNDS
Announcement of funding approvals will take place after the review and selection process is
complete. All applicants will receive official written notification regarding their request for
funding. If your proposed project has received preliminary approval for funding, you will be
contacted regarding additional information requirements needed before an agreement can be
processed. These requirements may include Minnesota Historical Society review, a deed
restriction and other details.
If the Minnesota Historical Society (MHS) determines that there is a potential for the site to yield
historical or archeological information, you will be contacted and provided instructions on hiring
an archeological consultant to perform an on-site survey and to coordinates with the MHS to
ensure the project will have no adverse effects on these resources. These surveys are to be funded
by the applicant and must be completed before grant funds can be reimbursed.
Projects cannot begin until all final documentation has been submitted and a grant agreement has
been completed. This process can take three months to complete. Most projects can expect to
begin in the fall. Any project costs incurred prior to the start date of the grant agreement will not
be eligible for reimbursement. Nor can they be considered as part of the required local match.
Payment of grant funds to the local sponsor is on a reimbursement basis. The grant recipient must
initially expend monies that are then reimbursed under the terms of the grant agreement. Ten
percent of the grant funds will be retained until a final inspection has been completed.
GRANTS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION
Under MN Statute 13.599, responses to a request for proposal are nonpublic until the application
deadline is reached. At that time, the name and address of the grantee, and the amount requested
becomes public.
After the application evaluation process is completed, data (except trade secret data) becomes
public. Data created during the evaluation process is nonpublic until the negotiation of the grant
agreement with the selected grantee(s) is completed.
MN Statute 13.44 categorizes estimated or appraised value of real property prior to purchase and
sale as confidential data on individuals or protected nonpublic data. See also Minnesota
Government Data Privacy Act for more information. This information, along with corresponding
budget information, will be redacted from the applications before making them public.
OR December 2011
8
III. Program Requirements
LAND RETENTION REQUIREMENTS
1) CONVERSION OF USE: It is the intention of the State that the property acquired
under an agreement shall exist in the Grantee's ownership and be maintained and
managed consistent with the purpose identified in the application. The Grantee shall
not at any time convert any property acquired or developed pursuant to the agreement
to uses other than the permitted uses specified in this agreement without the prior
written approval of the State. The State will consider a conversion request only after
the following pre-requisites have been met:
1. All practical alternatives to the conversion have been evaluated and rejected on
a sound basis.
2. The Grantee has agreed to replace the converted lands with other lands of at
least equal fair market value and reasonably equivalent recreational usefulness as
determined by the State.
The State shall have the authority to approve or disapprove conversion requests.
2) DEED RESTRICTION REQUIREMENT: The Grantee will be required to record a
condition with the deed of the property acquired and, if necessary, adjacent lands owned
by the applicant. The condition is to ensure that the property will be permanently
managed and maintained consistent with the purpose identified in the application, and
that the property may not be used for any other purpose without written approval from the
State. The specific language for the condition will depend on the funding source
provided and will be stated in the grant agreement.
The Site Boundary Map submitted with your application will delineate and establish the property
boundaries subject to the grant agreement. Therefore, it is very important that any existing public
facilities and any known future public facilities (e.g., wells, lift stations, roadway improvements,
etc.) are clearly identified and excluded from the boundaries of the project. The site boundaries
should include only the property that the project sponsor plans on managing for outdoor
recreation uses in perpetuity.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
It is the policy of the State of Minnesota to monitor progress on state grants by requiring grantees to
submit written progress reports at least annually until all grant funds have been expended and all of
the terms in the grant agreement have been met. A progress report form will be provided by program
staff. Grant payments shall not be made on grants with past due progress reports unless program staff
have given the grantee a written extension.
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
It is the policy of the State of Minnesota to conduct at least one monitoring visit per grant period
on all state grants of over $50,000 and to conduct at least annual monitoring visits on grants of
over $250,000.
OR December 2011
9
CLOSEOUT PROCEDURES
Upon completion of your project, a final billing must be submitted to our office no later than 30
days after the expiration date on your agreement. Program staff will complete a final inspection
of the project. The inspection will focus on ensuring that the project was completed in
accordance with the grant agreement, that facilities developed are accessible and a funding
acknowledgment sign is installed. If any problems are revealed during the inspection, they will
need to be corrected before you receive final reimbursement for your grant and the official
closeout notification for your project.
All expenditures are subject to verification by an independent state audit and, therefore, you must
retain all project records for a period of at least six years after you receive the official closeout
notification letter.
Periodic post-completion inspections will be conducted to ensure that the site is being properly
operated and maintained and that no conversion of use has occurred.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT SIGN
All projects acquired or developed with assistance from this program must display a state
approved funding acknowledgment sign at the main entrance to the park. The grant program
staff will provide the specific sign information.
AVAILABILITY TO USERS
Public property, facilities & programs that receive state assistance and future development of a
site that has received state assistance shall be open to entry by all persons regardless of race,
color, national origin, religion or sex. No person shall, on the basis of disability shall be excluded
from participation in any program or activity receiving state assistance. Finally, discrimination on
the basis of residence, including preferential reservation, membership or annual permit systems is
prohibited except to the extent that reasonable differences in admission and other fees may be
maintained on the basis of residence. Fees charged to non-residents cannot exceed twice that
charged to residents and must be comparable to fees charged at other state or local facilities.
IV. Contact Information
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Division of Parks and Trails
500 Lafayette Road, Box 52
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Audrey Mularie, Southern Minnesota, North Metro
audrey.mularie@state.mn.usor (651) 259-5549
Joe Hiller
Northern Minnesota, South Metro
joe.hiller@state.mn.us or (651) 259-5538
5A
5
3
6
7
4
9
8
1 2
12
10
11
Wright County
Parks
Created by: Wright County GIS, Office of the County Surveyor
January, 2009
08001,600400
Feet
Bertram Chain of Lakes
Map 2 Project Area 2
Parcel #Land AcresWater AcresTotal Acres
140.17040.17
239.89039.89
5A104.3339.7144.03
6174.640174.64
7121.0948.23169.32
834.27.9542.15
99.5746.2755.84
109.8132.3742.18
110.3400.34
1241.870.3342.2
Phase Acres Year Funded Grant $Non-Local Funding Source County $City $Total Status/Result
1 2008 $1,000,000 LCCMR/Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $3,000,000 Funds Expended Phase 1 Completed December, 2008
1 2008 $200,000 DNR-Metro Greenways/Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund $200,000 $200,000 $600,000 Funds Expended Phase 1 Completed December, 2008
1 318 Total 2008 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $3,600,000
2 51.4 2010 $549,628 DNR-Metro Greenways/Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund $274,814 $274,814 $1,099,256 Funds Expended Phase II Completed June 2010
3 Aug-08 $266,249 DNR-Non-Metro Regional Parks/LAWCON (Federal)$148,101 $148,101 $562,451 Grant Awarded & Encumbered for Phase 3, Local Share has not been requested.
3 Jan-10 $400,000 DNR-Legacy Park/Amendment (Legacy Amendment Funds)$222,500 $222,500 $845,000 Grant Awarded & Encumbered for Phase 3, Local Share has not been requested.
3 Sep-10 $334,725 DNR-Non-Metro Regional Parks/LAWCON (Federal)$167,363 $167,363 $669,451 Grant Awarded & Encumbered for Phase 3, Local Share has not been requested.
3 Sep-10 $76,000 DNR-Legacy Park/Amendment (Legacy Amendment Funds)$61,299 $61,299 $198,598 Grant Awarded & Encumbered for Phase 3, Local Share has not been requested.
126 Total 2011 $1,076,974 $599,263 $599,263 $2,275,500 Grant Awarded & Encumbered for Phase 3, Local Share has not been requested.
$2,826,602 ENTF, LAWCON, Parks Legacy Amendment $2,074,077 $2,074,077 $6,974,756
4 140 2011-2012 $2,993,625 Non-Metro/Legacy Park/Either Legacy Funds or LAWCON (Federal)$2,993,625 Grants submitted
$833,333 Funding awarded from above for parcels 9,10 and 12 $204,000 $204,000 $1,241,000 Grant funding awarded (from Legacy/ENTF)
615 2013-2014 5,340,065$ Park Legacy/Non-Metro/LAWCON/DNR Outdoor Rec 3,472,089$ 3,472,089$ 12,284,244$
Parcels 8,1,2, 3 and 4, balance of 5, 7
1250.35 $9,000,000 44% non-local, 28% County, 28% City $5,750,000 $5,750,000 $20,500,000
Overall Funding Plan
Remaining Funding Needs (If Phase IV Proposed Funding is approved)
Total Funding to Date
Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park - Acquisition Project Funding History and Needs
Phase I Funding (2008)
Phase 2 Funding (2010)
Phase 3 Funding
2012 Proposed Acqusition with Grant Information
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
9.ConsiderationtoadoptOrdinance#547,amendingTitle10oftheMonticelloCity
Code,MonticelloZoningOrdinance,Section4.5-Signs (AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
InFebruaryof2011,theCityofMonticelloadoptedaninterimordinanceallowingfor
theexpansioninusageoftemporarysignage.TheinterimordinanceexpiredonJanuary
1,2012.
Thefollowingtableillustratesacomparisoninflexibilityallowedundertheinterim
ordinance.Thecompleteinterimordinance,whichincludesotherperformancestandards,
isalsoincludedwiththisreportasSupportingData.
CodeRequirement ExistingOrdinance InterimOrdinance
SignsAllowedPerparcelPerbusiness,signmustbelocated
onparcelonwhichbusinessin
located
NumberofSignsper
Location
11signevery75linearfeetof
ROW,1signperbusiness
NumberofDays(Annual)40Unlimited
PermitRequiredYesYes
TheinterimordinancewasadoptedtoallowthePlanningCommission,andCityasa
whole,anopportunitytoanalyzethetemporarysignissueoverafiniteperiodand
determinetheimpacts(bothpositiveandnegative)oftheinterimregulation.
Atthistime,theCommissionisaskedtoreviewallavailabledatacompiledduringthe
interimordinanceperiodandtomakearecommendationonfurthertemporarysign
ordinanceamendmentsrelativetotheCity’sgoalsforsignageasacomponentoflanduse
policy.
Analysis
Inregardtoanalyzingtheoutcomesoftheinterimordinance,threeprimarypiecesof
informationareofferedforCommission’sreview:
1.Permitdata
Duringtheperiodoftheinterimordinance,38temporarysignpermitswereissued.
Forreference,in2010,theCityissued25temporarysignpermits.
TheMonticelloChamberofCommercehasindicatedthatthecommunityiscurrently
hometoapproximately430businesses.
Thispermit-to-businessratiosuggeststhatamajorityofbusinesses(particularlyin
theindustrialdistricts)donotutilizetemporarysignage.Lessthan10%ofbusinesses
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
2
utilizetemporarysignage.Theoutlierstothisstatementincludethosesignsplaced
withoutpermitandotherbusinessesthatillustrateinfrequentusagetendencies.
FurtheranalysisofpermitdataisincludedinItem3.
2.Streetcorridorimages
Inreviewingtheimagestakenbybuildinginspectorsoverthelast12months,the
primaryissuesarerelatedtothepermitting,type,condition,and/orlocationof
signage.
a)ManyofthesignswereillegallyplacedwithintheROWorwereoff-premise.
b)Signswereconstructedofprohibitedmaterialsandwerepoorlymaintained.
c)Signswereillegalduetolackofsignpermit.
d)Theuseofmultiplesigntypesatonetime,inviolationoftheordinance.The
codeallowsthedisplayofonlyonetemporarysigndeviceatatime.Many
businessesutilizebanners,flags,andportablesignsintandem.
Inthecaseofitem“a)”above,itshouldbenotedthattheuseofcity,county,stateand
federalright-of-waysforsignageisstrictlyprohibitedandinthecaseofstate,county
andfederalright-of-ways,cannotbepermittedfortemporarysignageunderany
ordinanceamendment.Thisisarecognizedissueformanycommercialcorridor
businessesseekingtogainvisibilityfortheirtemporarysignage.However,theCity
doesnothavetheabilityorauthoritytoaddressthisissue.
3.Surveyoftemporarysignpermitholders
Attheconclusionoftheinterimordinance,ashortsurveywassenttoalltemporary
signpermitholders.Ofthe38businesspermitholders,27providedtheiremail
address.TheCityreceived15surveyresponses,a57%responserate.Twosurvey
remindersweresenttotrytoincreaseresponse.Itshouldbenotedthatthesurvey
responserepresentslessthan50%ofthepermitholders.
ThefullsurveyreportisincludedfortheCityCouncil’sreference.
Surveyresults:
Themajorityofsurveyrespondentsindicatedthattheywereawareofthe
interimordinance.
Themajorityofsurveyrespondents(79+%)usedunder60totaldaysof
signage.
Themajorityofrespondentsalsoutilizedotherformsoftemporarysignage
including:electronicorchangeablecopyboards,windowsignage,sandwich
boardsandbannersignage.
Therespondentsweresplitfairlyevenlybetweenmulti-tenant(46%)and
singlepad(54%)businesses,whichmirrorstheMonticelloChamber’soverall
communitybusinessinventory.TheChamber’sinventoryshows431total
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
3
businesses,with199multi-tenantbusinesses,ora46%multi-tenantbusiness
make-up.
Withtheaboveinformationunderstoodasasamplingofinterimordinanceoutcomes,
staffispresentedthePlanningCommissionwithtwopotentialalternativesfor
consideration.
Alternative1:Extendtheinterimordinanceforoneadditionalyear
StaffmetwithagroupofbusinessrepresentativesinJanuaryofthisyeartogather
feedbackontheoutcomesoftheinterimordinanceandtheirrecommendationfor
permanentamendments.ThegroupincludedChamberofCommercestaff,marketing
professionals,propertyowners,andbusinessowners.Thisgroupwasthesamesample
groupinvolvedinthepreparationoftheinitialinterimordinance.
Thisgroupindicatedsupportformuchofthelanguagecontainedwithintheinterim
ordinance,statingthattheordinanceseemedtoworkwellfortheirneeds.Acopyofthe
interimordinanceisincludedasSupportingData,withtheprovisionssupportedbythis
businessgroup.Insummary,thegroupsupportedthenumber,size,spacing,and
allowanceperbusinessprovisionsoftheinterimordinance.Inadditiontothese
standards,thegroupsuggestedthattheCityaddlanguagerelatingtomaintenanceand
appearanceofsignage,requiringthatsignownerskeepthesignsingoodrepair.In
addition,thegroupagreedthatastreamlinedcodewhichgroupsbothportabletemporary
signsandattentiongettingdevicestogetheras“temporarysigns”wasbestforclarityand
easeofregulation.
However,thegroupdidexpressconcernwithatightlimitationonthenumberofdays
allowed.Therewasnosupportforreturningtoa40daymaximumperyear.Instead,
somemembersofthegroupsoughtacompleterelaxationofthecodeinthisarea
(allowinganunlimitednumberofdaysandchangingtheterminologyfrom“temporary”
to“portable”.Otherssuggestedatieredapproachthatwouldallowanoverallincreasein
thenumberofdays,butwiththenumberofdayssplitbetweentypesofsignage(banner,
portable,flags).Thisapproachwouldallowbusinessesmoreflexibilityinhowtheyuse
temporarysigndevices.
Ultimately,thegrouprecommendedthattheCityaddtheprovisionformaintenanceto
theexistinginterimordinanceandthenextendtheinterimordinanceforoneadditional
year.Inthattime,theCitycouldcontinuetoevaluatetheimpactofunlimitedsaysof
use,completeadditionalstudyonthevisualpreferenceoftheentirecommunity,and
examinealternativesforthetieredapproach.
Alternative2:Amendthetemporarysignordinancewithsuggestedmodifications
Staffalsopresentedanoptionforamendment,indicatingthat,ifthePlanning
Commissionbelievedenoughinformationwasgatheredduringthisinitialinterim
ordinanceperiod,asetofamendmentsreflectingablendingoftherecommendationsof
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
4
staff(whicharebasedonthedatacollected)andthebusinesscommunitycouldbe
adoptedwithprovisionsasfollows,withchangesfromthecurrentcodeinredbold
italics.
(1)ForpropertyinaBusinessDistrictoranIndustrialDistrict(seetable3-1),theuseof
commercialtemporarysigndevicesshallnotexceedforty(40)ninety(90)daysper
calendaryearperbuilding business.Notmorethanone(1)temporarysigndeviceper
buildingshallbedisplayeduponapropertyatanyonetime.Theareaoftemporary
signdevicesshallnotexceedthirty-two(32)forty(40)squarefeet.
NOTE:Commissionmaywishtoaddresstheissueofbusiness’utilizing
portablesignageand bannersignage,ormultiplebanners,atthesametime.
Again,thisiscurrentlyaviolationofthecode.Anoptionforsuchadditional
usagecouldbeconsideredaspartofthetieredapproachdiscussedinmore
detailbelow.
Staffcontinuestorecommendonesignperbusinessforeaseofuseforboth
theCityandtheapplicant.
Commissionwillnotethatthisisasubstantialincreaseoftotaltemporary
signagedaysoverthecurrentallowanceof40days.However,itisconsistent
withthemajorityofpermitresponsesfornumberofdaysused.
Analternativetieredapproachcouldbeincorporatedinsteadofasingular
statementofdays.Permitpricingwouldtier,accordingly.
Example:
91-120totaldays:Anycombinationofdaysfortemporarysigndevices
includingportablesignage,attention-gettingdevice,pennants,flags,
and/orbanner.Onlyonetemporarysigndeviceperbusinessatanysingle
timeperiodshallbepermitted.
61-90totaldays:Anycombinationofdaysfortemporarysigndevices
includingportablesignage,attention-gettingdevice,pennants,flags,
and/orbanner.Onlyonetemporarysigndeviceperbusinessatanysingle
timeperiodshallbepermitted.
1-60:Anycombinationofdaysfortemporarysigndevicesincluding
portablesignage,attention-gettingdevice,pennants,flags,and/orbanner.
Onlyonetemporarysigndeviceperbusinessatanysingletimeperiod
shallbepermitted.
(2)One(1)temporarysignshallbeallowedeveryseventy-five(75)linealfeetofstreet
frontage,onnotmorethantwo(2)publicstreets,andshallbelocatedontheparcel
forwhichthepermithasbeenissued.Temporarysignsmustbelocatedonprivate
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
5
propertybypermissionoftheownerandmaynotbelocatedonanypubliceasement
orright-of-way.
(3)Temporarysignsmustbeconstructedofmaterialsconsistentwithtemporarysigns
(portable)suchasaluminum,acrylic,plexiglass,lexan,polycarbonate,orother
comparablematerialsandmaynotbeconstructedofplywood,chipboard,
unfinishedmaterials,orothersimilarmaterials.Inthecaseofbanners,weather-
resistantplasticorpolymaterialsshallberequired.Alltemporarysignagemustbe
keptingoodrepairandmaynotconstituteanuisanceasdefinedbyTitle7,
Chapter1ofCityCode.
(4)Incaseswherepropertiesforego,inwriting,temporarysignageallowedbySection
4.5(I)(1)above,anadditionalpermanentmessageboardsignuptofifty(50)square
feetinareashallbeallowed.Suchsignmaybeincorporatedintoaproperty’s
freestandingsignorthebuildingasadditionalwallsignarea.Freestandingsignsshall
besubjecttotheheightlimitationsoftheapplicablezoningdistrict.
(5)Governmentbuildingsandstructures,publicandquasi-publicbuildings,public
parksandrecreationareas,publiceducationalinstitutionslimitedtoaccredited
elementary,middleorseniorhighschools,andreligiousinstitutionsshallbe
allowedtemporarysignageinaccordancewiththeprovisions(1)through(6)ofthis
ordinance.
Thisprovision,althoughnotpartoftheinterimordinancediscussion,isa
staff-recommendedamendmentnecessarytoaddresstheissueof
regulationsfortemporarysignagefornon-profitandpublicentitieslocated
inresidentialdistricts.
(6)SubjecttootherprovisionsofSection4.5(I),one(1)additionaltemporarysigndevice
shallbepermittedforabusinessonaone-timebasisforaperiodofuptoforty(40)
daystobeutilizedwithinsix(6)monthsofthefirstdayofthebusinessopeningtothe
public.SuchsignageshallnotbelimitedbytheprovisionsofSections4.5(I)(2).
ThealternativesaboveallowtheCitythelatitudetoconsiderrecommendinganextension
oftheinterimordinanceasis,extendtheinterimordinancewithmodifications,orto
adoptanordinancebasedonthedatacollectedunderthetwelvemonthsoftheexpired
interimordinance.
PlanningCommissionRecommendation
ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonthisitemonFebruary21st,2012.The
Commissionvoted3-2infavorofrecommendationtoadoptOrdinance#547in
accordancewithAlternative#2.
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
6
AletterofpubliccommentfromPatSawatzke,ownerofRiverCitySigns,atemporary
signrentalbusinessinMonticello,wasprovidedaspartofthepublicrecord.Mr.
SawatzkestatedsupportforAlternative#2above,amendingthetemporarysign
ordinanceasproposedbystaff.Nootherpublictestimonywasofferedduringthe
hearing.TheChamberofCommercedidpublicizethehearingintheirweeklyemailand
intheirnewsletter.
CommissionersDragstenandFyle,votingindissent,indicatedthatalthoughthe
amendmentwasgenerallyfavorable,theypreferredanextensionoftheinterimordinance
foranadditionalyearinlightofeconomicconditions.ThebalanceoftheCommission
indicatedthattheybelievedenoughdatahadbeengatheredandthattheamendments
representedafairexpansionoftemporarysignallowances.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#547amendingTitle10oftheMonticelloCityCode,
MonticelloZoningOrdinance,Chapter4.5,Signs,asrecommendedinAlternative
#2aboveandbasedonthefindingsoffactasstatedinthestaffreportof2/21/12.
2.MotiontoadoptanextensionofInterimOrdinance#526,aninterimordinance
providingtemporaryexpansionoftemporarysignageallowanceswithintheCity
ofMonticello,basedonafindingthatadditionalinformationisneededfor
developmentoffinalordinanceamendments,toDecember31,2012.
3.Motiontotabletheitemforfurtherreview.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1foradoptionofOrdinance#547basedonthe
includedfindingsoffact.Staffbelievesthattheproposedamendmentsprovideneeded
flexibilityfortemporarysignusers,increasingtheoverallnumberofdays,allowing
signagetobedistributedequitablybybusiness(ratherthanbuildingorparcel),and
creatingneededstandardsforsignmaintenance.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.Ordinance#547–AmendmenttoTitle10,Section4.5(I)–TemporarySigns
B.FindingsofFact
C.PlanningCommissionMinutes,2/21/12
D.MonticelloZoningOrdinance,Chapter4.5–Signs
E.InterimOrdinance#526
F.PermitHolderData
G.PermitHolderSignSurvey
H.CorridorImages
I.NeighboringCommunityComparison–TemporarySignRegulations
J.PublicCommentLetter
ORDINANCENO.547
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10–MONTICELLOZONING
ORDINANCEOFTHEMONTICELLOCITYCODE,
SECTION4.5(I)–TEMPORARYSIGNS
THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLOHEREBYORDAINS:
Section1.Section4.5(I)–TemporarySigns,Title10–ZoningOrdinanceishereby
amendedasfollows:
(I)TemporarySigns
(1)ForpropertyinaBusinessDistrictoranIndustrialDistrict(see
table3-1),theuseofcommercialtemporarysigndevicesshallnot
exceedforty(40)ninety(90)dayspercalendaryearperbuilding
business.Notmorethanone(1)temporarysigndeviceperbuilding
shallbedisplayeduponapropertyatanyonetime.Theareaof
temporarysigndevicesshallnotexceedthirty-two(32)forty(40)
squarefeet.
(2)One(1)temporarysignshallbeallowedeveryseventy-five(75)
linealfeetofstreetfrontage,onnotmorethantwo(2)public
streets,andshallbelocatedontheparcelforwhichthepermithas
beenissued.Temporarysignsmustbelocatedonprivateproperty
bypermissionoftheownerandmaynotbelocatedonanypublic
easementorright-of-way.
(3)Temporarysignsmustbeconstructedofmaterialsconsistentwith
temporarysigns(portable)suchasaluminum,acrylic,plexiglass,
lexan,polycarbonate,orothercomparablematerialsandmaynot
beconstructedofplywood,chipboard,unfinishedmaterials,or
othersimilarmaterials.Inthecaseofbanners,weather-resistant
plasticorpolymaterialsshallberequired.Alltemporarysignage
mustbekeptingoodrepairandmaynotconstituteanuisanceas
definedbyTitle7,Chapter1ofCityCode.
(2)(4)Incaseswherepropertiesforego,inwriting,temporarysignage
allowedbySection4.5(I)(1)above,anadditionalpermanent
messageboardsignuptofifty(50)squarefeetinareashallbe
allowed.Suchsignmaybeincorporatedintoaproperty’s
freestandingsignorthebuildingasadditionalwallsignarea.
Freestandingsignsshallbesubjecttotheheightlimitationsofthe
applicablezoningdistrict.
ORDINANCENO.547
(5)Governmentbuildingsandstructures,publicandquasi-public
buildings,publicparksandrecreationareas,publiceducational
institutionslimitedtoaccreditedelementary,middleorseniorhigh
schools,andreligiousinstitutionsshallbeallowedtemporary
signageinaccordancewiththeprovisions(1)through(6)ofthis
ordinance.
(3)(6)SubjecttootherprovisionsofSection4.5(I),one(1)additional
temporarysigndeviceshallbepermittedforabusinessonaone-
timebasisforaperiodofuptoforty(40)daystobeutilizedwithin
six(6)monthsofthefirstdayofthebusinessopeningtothepublic.
SuchsignageshallnotbelimitedbytheprovisionsofSections
4.5(I)(2).
Section2.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafterits
passageandpublication.Revisionswillbemadeonlineafteradoptionby
Council.CopiesofthecompleteZoningOrdinanceareavailableonline
andatMonticelloCityHall.
ADOPTEDANDAPPROVEDFORPUBLICATIONBY theMonticelloCityCouncil
this12th dayofMarch,2012.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
____________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
VOTINGINFAVOR:
VOTINGINOPPOSITION:
City Council Agenda: 03/12/12
1
FINDINGS OF FACT – ORDINANCE #547
SUPPORTING DATA ITEM B
The amendment is consistent with the City’s purpose in regulating the number, size, type and
other physical characteristics of signs in order to promote the public health, safety and welfare.
The amendment language proposed addresses the primary concerns noted by the interim
ordinance data, including the need for valid permits, the desire for well-maintained and
attractive temporary signage, and the continued prohibition of off-premise signage.
An amendment providing an allowance for additional days is justified by the permit holder
survey data, and can allows flexibility for business owners in their sign device choice.
Regulating temporary signage as described within the proposed amendment preserves and
maintains the scenic and aesthetic environment of the community, and protects and promotes
the quality of life of the City’s residents.
Regulation of temporary signage is necessary for the safety of local and visiting motorists and
pedestrians and to reduce the distracting influence of uncontrolled signage.
MINUTES
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, February 21, 2012 - 6:00 PM
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Commissioners: Rod Dragsten, Brad Fyle, Charlotte Gabler, Barry Voight, and
William Spartz
Council Liaison: Lloyd Hilgart
Staff: Angela Schumann, Ron Hackenmueller, Steve Grittman-NAC
1. Call to order
Rod Dragsten called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Consideration to approve Planning Commission minutes of January 3, 2012
BILL SPARTZ MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 3, 2012.
MOTION WAS SECONDED BY CHARLOTTE GABLER. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
3. Citizen Comments None
4. Consideration of adding items to the agenda None
5. Continued Public Hearing - Consideration to adopt the City of Monticello Official
Zoning Map
The Planning Commission tabled action on this item in January to allow staff the
opportunity to research the final zoning action and zoning designation for the old
bowling alley property (101 Chelsea Road). Staff confirmed that City Council acted
to rezone Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Oakwood Industrial Park, the bowling alley
parcels, via Ordinance #521 in June 2011. This action was taken outside of the
pending sale transaction, due to rezoning action’s consistency with the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
The map reflects the three rezoning actions taken in 2011. These include:
Rezoning from I-1 (Light Industrial) to B-2 (Neighborhood Business) for 101
Chelsea Road – Ordinance #531
Rezoning from I-1 (Light Industrial) to B-4 (Regional Business) for 102 Thomas
Park Drive – Ordinance #534
Rezoning from I-1 (Light Industrial) to B-4 (Regional Business) for 9766 Fallon
Avenue – Resolution 2011-092, completed with Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
The Bondhus Tool property, located at 1400 East Broadway, was incorrectly zoned R-2
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
2
with the 2011 Zoning Ordinance update and map revision. The property is guided
industrial and was zoned I-1 on the pre-2011 zoning maps. The public hearing for the
rezoning of the Bondhus property is scheduled next on this agenda. The map illustrates
the proper zoning as I-1.
The public hearing was opened. Hearing no public comments, the public hearing was
closed.
BILL SPARTZ MOVED TO RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF THE 2012 CITY OF
MONTICELLO OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, SUBJECT TO FINAL ZONING
ACTION AS TAKEN BY THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL RELATED TO
THE BONDHUS TOOL PARCELS (1400 E. BROADWAY). MOTION WAS
SECONDED BY BRAD FYLE. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
6. Public Hearing - Consideration of request for Rezoning from R-1 (Single Family
Residential) to I-1 (Light Industrial) for 1400 East Broadway Applicant: City of
Monticello
The Bondhus Tool property, located at 1400 East Broadway, was incorrectly zoned R-1
(Single-Family Residential) with the 2011 Zoning Ordinance update and map revision.
The rezoning of the subject property is intended to correct an error related to the adoption
of a new zoning map occurring concurrently with the adoption of the 2011
comprehensive zoning ordinances. The property was zoned I-1 on the pre-2011 zoning
maps and was not intended for rezoning action as part of the ordinance update.
Chapter 2.4 B (5) Approval Criteria
Recommendations and decisions on zoning amendments shall be based on consideration
of the following criteria:
a) Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error in the original text or map; or
b) Whether the proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing condition,
trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area.
c) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with achieving the goals and
objectives outlined in the comprehensive plan.
The rezoning is supported under criteria “a” above. The property is guided as “Places to
Work” in the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan, and therefore also meets review
criteria “c” above.
Bondhus Tool Company is currently in operation on the subject parcels. Bondhus Tool is
a light manufacturing facility and therefore consistent with the I-1 (Light Industrial)
zoning designation. The rezoning represents a return to appropriate zoning based on a
review of all available records. Rezoning would occur concurrently with the adoption of
2012 Zoning Map subject to Council approval.
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
3
The public hearing was opened.
Rod Dragsten asked the property owner why the smallest parcel hadn’t been combined
with the rest of property.
Property owner Mary K. Bondhus shared her understanding of the history of that smallest
parcel. It had been included in the purchase agreement but either hadn’t been signed off
on or transferred in the same way as the other properties prior to Stuart Hoglund’s death.
She noted that it has a tax value of $15 and that it would not be cost-effective to pay an
attorney to handle that administrative change. Angela Schumann indicated that it would
be possible to combine properties administratively if the property owner chose to do so.
Hearing no other public comment, the public hearing was closed.
BILL SPARTZ MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2012-017,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE #544 REZONING FROM R-1
(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1400 EAST BROADWAY. MOTION WAS
SECONDED BY BARRY VOIGHT. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
7. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request to amend Title 10 of the Monticello City
Code, Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4.5, Signs
In February of 2011, Monticello adopted an interim ordinance allowing for the expansion
in usage of temporary signage. The interim ordinance was adopted to allow an
opportunity to analyze the temporary sign issue over a finite period and determine the
impacts of the interim regulation. The interim ordinance expired on January 1, 2012. The
Commission was asked to review all available data compiled during the interim
ordinance period and make a recommendation for further action. The two primary issues
with temporary signage continue to be how to handle equity among businesses and how
many days is reasonable for temporary signage.
Staff summarized the comparison in flexibility allowed under the interim ordinance.
Code Requirement Existing Ordinance Interim Ordinance
Signs Allowed Per parcel Per business, sign must be
located on parcel on which
business in located
Number of Signs per
Location
1 1 sign every 75 linear feet
of ROW, 1 sign per
business
Number of Days (Annual) 40 Unlimited
Permit Required Yes Yes
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
4
Three primary measures were used to evaluate the interim ordinance: permit data,
street corridor images, and survey data.
1. Permit data- During the period of the interim ordinance, 26 temporary sign permits
were issued. This permit-to-business ratio suggests that a majority of businesses do
not utilize temporary signage.
2. Street corridor images- Based on images taken by building inspectors, the primary
issues are related to the permitting, type, and/or location of signage versus the actual
number of signs.
3. Survey of temporary sign permit holders-Of the 26 business permit holders, the
City received 15 survey responses, a 57% response rate.
The majority of survey respondents indicated that they were aware of the
interim ordinance.
The majority (79+%) used under 60 total days of signage.
The majority of respondents also utilized other forms of temporary signage.
The respondents were split fairly evenly between multi-tenant (46%) and
single pad (54%) businesses.
Alternative 1: Extend the interim ordinance for one additional year
Staff met with business representatives in January to gather feedback on the outcomes of
the interim ordinance and recommendation for permanent amendments. The group
supported the number, size, spacing, and allowance per business provisions of the interim
ordinance. The group also suggested adding language requiring that sign owners keep
the signs in good repair. The group agreed that a streamlined code which groups both
portable temporary signs and attention getting devices together as “temporary signs” was
best for clarity and ease of regulation. The group recommended that the City add the
provision for maintenance to the existing interim ordinance and extend the interim
ordinance for one additional year. In that time, the City could continue to evaluate the
impact of unlimited says of use, complete additional study on the visual preference of the
entire community, and examine alternatives for a tiered approach.
Alternative 2: Amend the temporary sign ordinance with suggested modifications
Alternative 2 is a set of amendments reflecting a blending of the recommendations of
staff (which are based on the data collected) and the business community which could be
adopted with provisions as follows.
(1) For property in a Business District or an Industrial District (see table 3-1), the
use of commercial temporary sign devices shall not exceed forty (40) ninety (90)
days per calendar year per building business. Not more than one (1) temporary
sign device per building shall be displayed upon a property at any one time. The
area of temporary sign devices shall not exceed thirty-two (32) forty (40) square
feet.
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
5
(2) One (1) temporary sign shall be allowed every seventy-five (75) lineal feet of
street frontage, on not more than two (2) public streets, and shall be located on the
parcel for which the permit has been issued. Temporary signs must be located on
private property by permission of the owner and may not be located on any public
easement or right-of-way.
(3) Temporary signs must be constructed of materials consistent with temporary
signs (portable) such as aluminum, acrylic, plexiglas, lexan, polycarbonate, or
other comparable materials and may not be constructed of plywood, chipboard,
unfinished materials, or other similar materials. In the case of banners, weather-
resistant plastic or poly materials shall be required. All temporary signage must be
kept in good repair and may not constitute a nuisance as defined by Title 7,
Chapter 1 of City Code.
(4) In cases where properties forego, in writing, temporary signage allowed by
Section 4.5(I)(1) above, an additional permanent message board sign up to fifty
(50) square feet in area shall be allowed. Such sign may be incorporated into a
property’s freestanding sign or the building as additional wall sign area.
Freestanding signs shall be subject to the height limitations of the applicable
zoning district.
(5) Government buildings and structures, public and quasi-public buildings, public
parks and recreation areas, public educational institutions limited to accredited
elementary, middle or senior high schools, and religious institutions shall be
allowed temporary signage in accordance with the provisions (1) through (6) of this
ordinance.
(6) Subject to other provisions of Section 4.5(I), one (1) additional temporary sign
device shall be permitted for a business on a one-time basis for a period of up to
forty (40) days to be utilized within six (6) months of the first day of the business
opening to the public. Such signage shall not be limited by the provisions of
Sections 4.5(I)(2).
This issue will move forward for City Council consideration on March 12th. A letter
would be sent to the business community outlining the recommended ordinance and
enforcement policy.
Bill Spartz asked about the penalty for signs placed in inappropriate locations. Staff noted
that the signs would be removed and the business would be contacted. Building
Department will conduct a weekly spring sweep in an effort to hold businesses more
accountable for temporary signage.
Rod Dragsten pointed out that some people doesn’t understand where the right of way is
located and suggested that the City indicate road width and road right-of-way on maps to
be distributed to permit holders.
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
6
Staff noted that property owners in the CCD who have not been applying for permits
when putting up temporary signage should be subject to enforcement.
Brad Fyle recommended extending the interim ordinance for one more year.
Barry Voight expressed frustration with the number of permits issued during the interim
ordinance as well as the lack of survey results and suggested that the City put the issue to
rest. He said the City was led to believe that temporary sign ordinances made it difficult
to run a business in town but that Monticello’s ordinance is in line with how this issue is
handled in surrounding communities. He noted that enforcement is key but stated that
businesses have to be held accountable too.
He specifically asked staff if provision number 6 in Exhibit I, which deals with additional
signage related to grand openings, needed to be amended. Staff indicated that it should be
broadened to include both provisions 1 and 4.
Rod Dragsten said that he thought the business community monitored themselves well
but would prefer to see no limit on the number of days for temporary signage and extend
the ordinance for one more year.
Bill Spartz said that 90 days is sufficient and would like to put the matter to rest.
Charlotte Gabler said a number of days would be needed for enforcement and agrees with
the 90 days.
Ron Hackenmueller clarified that the total number of temporary signs for the year may
have been closer to 40 for both 2011 and 2010 but that 26 is the number of temporary
signs during the interim ordinance.
Lloyd Hilgart asked how many temporary sign users did not have a permit. Staff
estimated there may have been 8-10 that were then asked to obtain a permit.
Angela Schumann stated that regulating the number of days for temporary signs does
matter in terms of community aesthetics. There was further discussion about having to
track the number of days and the potential consequences of unlimited days.
The public hearing was opened.
Angela Schumann noted that the City had received a letter from River City Signs owner
Pat Sawatzke in support of Alternative 2, Motion 1.
Hearing no further public comment, the public hearing was closed.
BILL SPARTZ MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT #547, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE
MONTICELLO CITY CODE, MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
7
4.5, SIGNS, AS RECOMMENDED VIA ALTERNATIVE 2 ABOVE AND BASED ON
THE FINDINGS OF FACT AS STATED BELOW AND BROADENING NUMBER 6
IN EXHIBIT I TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS 1 & 4. MOTION WAS SECONDED BY
ROD DRAGSTEN. MOTION CARRIED 3-2 WITH BRAD FYLE AND BARRY
VOIGHT VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The amendment is consistent with the City’s purpose in regulating the number, size, type
and other physical characteristics of signs in order to promote the public health, safety
and welfare.
The amendment language proposed addresses the primary concerns noted by the interim
ordinance data, including the need for valid permits, the desire for well-maintained and
attractive temporary signage, and the continued prohibition of off-premise signage.
An amendment providing an allowance for additional days is justified by the permit
holder survey data, and can allow flexibility for business owners in their sign device
choice.
Regulating temporary signage as described within the proposed amendment preserves and
maintains the scenic and aesthetic environment of the community, and protects and
promotes the quality of life of the City’s residents.
Regulation of temporary signage is necessary for the safety of local and visiting motorists
and pedestrians and to reduce the distracting influence of uncontrolled signage.
8. Public Hearing – Consideration to amend Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 27,
Regulating the Management of the Mississippi Wild, Scenic, and Recreational River
System and the Shoreland Areas of the City of Monticello and Monticello Zoning
Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 for the adoption of Overlay Ordinances regulating the
Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Recreational River District and the Shoreland District.
Applicant: City of Monticello
As part of the 2010/2011 comprehensive Zoning Ordinance amendment process, the City
began revising existing Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Recreational regulations and the
drafting of new Shoreland ordinances.
For the past year, staff has been working with the City’s regional Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) representative, Roger Stradal, to develop a better understanding of
existing template ordinances and the process for revision and adoption of new
ordinances. State regulations require that the DNR review and certify the Shoreland and
Wild & Scenic provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Stradal has aided the City in
developing the ordinances consistent with statutes.
The City has incorporated all final comments from the DNR on the Mississippi Wild,
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
8
Scenic & Recreational ordinance. Staff plan to incorporate the DNR’s final comments on
the Shoreland ordinance and bring the revised ordinance forward for Planning
Commission review in March.
The ordinances will become overlay districts to the base zoning districts and act as a
second layer of regulation for properties lying within the boundaries of the overlay
districts. The City is responsible for enforcing these ordinances for any development
within that overlay district and rely on the DNR for secondary assistance when needed.
The City has actually needed to enforce the ordinance within the past year.
As Monticello’s portion of the Mississippi River has been defined by the State as
“Recreational”, the City is required to adopt local regulations consistent with standards
for “Recreational” river areas.
Specifically, the draft Mississippi Wild & Scenic ordinance outlines:
Allowable uses via City’s use table (Chapter 5), in accordance with MN Rules
Minimum standards for lots, including area and setbacks
o Commission will note that the lot area and setback are generally consistent
with the ranges provided for the R-A and R-1 districts, with larger area
requirements for riparian lots and larger setback requirements at the
shoreline.
o Both sewered and unsewered provisions are included, as there may be
cases in which recently annexed properties with private systems require
development require under these regulations.
Maximum impervious surface requirements
Additional performance standards for density, structure placement and stormwater
management
Limitations for clear-cutting and grading within the overlay district
o This City receives assistance in the administration and enforcement of
these regulations from the Wright County Soil & Water District and the
local DNR Conservation Officer.
Process for development and agency action
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission review the Mississippi Wild, Scenic &
Recreational ordinances and then continue the hearing to March for review of the
proposed Shoreland Ordinances. Once the Planning Commission recommends approval
of these ordinances they would go forward to City Council. Council would take action to
repeal the existing Chapter 27 in the zoning code and adopt these new sections in its
place.
Charlotte Gabler asked if planning for the future bridge crossing would be
affected by these ordinances. Angela Schumann noted that the bridge crossing
project would have its own environmental review process but that any
development that occurs outside the scope of that project in that area would be
affected.
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
9
Brad Fyle expressed his concern that the city should not approve anything that is
not required.
Angela Schumann said that the City has tried to adopt a model ordinance that
follows the base State statutes. She noted that any issues related to pathways or
roads would follow a different approval process and that the DNR is consulted
when pathways are proposed. She noted that staff also considers provisions of the
Wild and Scenic requirements as part of an environmental project memo in
applying for grants for paths and trails.
The public hearing was opened.
DNR representative Roger Stradel agreed that roads are typically already in place
in these areas and that the DNR is generally supportive of pathways as long as
they meet requirements.
Rod Dragsten asked for clarification about the requirements for screening a
structure on property on the river. He asked if a property owner who lived on the
river would not be allowed to have a view of the river from the home. Roger
Stradel summarized that there are specific requirements. Property ow ners are
allowed to remove brush and buckthorn and to trim trees. He described the
importance of trees in maintaining the shoreline and noted that there must be a
constant canopy and that trees larger than 4 inches in diameter must not be
removed.
Angela Schumann stated that provisions are designed to give the City the
flexibility to look at what is vegetation in place, what is being constructed, and
what is appropriate vegetative screening. As an example, a property owner
cleared brush along the shoreline and worked with Wright County to re-establish
native vegetation. The restoration improved the view of the river and kept the
property from eroding.
Hearing no further public comment, the public hearing was closed.
BARRY VOIGHT MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO MARCH
6TH, 2012, FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEWING THE SHORELAND OVERLAY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND CHAPTER 8, DEFINITIONS. MOTIONWAS
SECONDED BY BILL SPA RTZ . MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
9. Public Hearing – Consideration of a request for Amendment to the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section 4(P) for Specific Review Requirements and Procedures
for Planned Unit Development. Applicant: City of Monticello
Steve Grittman provided documentation related to a series of proposed amendments to
the City’s Planned Unit Development ordinance. The amendments proposed are a result
of feedback provided at the joint session Planning Commission and City Council
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
10
workshop held in October of 2011 as well as staff recommendations.
Most of the proposed changes are clerical or intended to clarify existing language and the
general form of the ordinance is left intact. The ordinance continues to allow Planned
Unit Development by zoning district only and retains the collaborative process. Another
change includes clarifications to processing and submission requirements, and specifies
that upon final approval of a PUD project, the applicant shall record a plat and the City
shall adopt a rezoning ordinance creating a new zoning district applying to the specific
parcel(s) in question, and changing the zoning map to this new district.
Steve Grittman briefly outlined specific proposed changes to the ordinance:
Deleted conditional clause from the purpose statement so that the city has authority to
deny a PUD
Deleted language related to base zoning district
Recommended addition of a referencing requirement
Deleted the minimum threshold size for the PUD
Clarified multiple party ownership
Removed planning objectives from ordinance language
Refocused language relating to development footprint and ecological-based approach
Broadened applicability of section from unit counts to intensity
Deleted incentive related to street size as a bonus for developers
Required developer to submit a calculation for net developable land
Specified option of submitting Concept Plan and Development Plan concurrently
Required identification of specific densities as part of Concept Plan submittal
Specified Planning Commission review and public hearing of application
Specified timing requirements for Council action on a concept plan
Clarified the distinction between the process of plat action and zoning action
Specified effective date clause for ordinance
Specified three levels of amendment
Added language about PUD cancellation process
The public hearing was opened. Hearing no public comment, the public hearing was
closed.
Angela Schumann suggested adding back language that had been included in the editorial
comments but inadvertently left out of Section 3, Specific PUD Preliminary Plat
Submittals. Specific documents required to be included are: building design and
materials, landscaping detail screening, fencing, grading, streets utilities, signage, and
lighting.
BARRY VOIGHT MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2012-019
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE #546 FOR THE PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND INCLUDING
LANGUAGE ADDED TO SECTION 3, SPECIFIC PUD PRELIMINARY PLAT
Planning Commission Minutes – 02/21/12
11
SUBMITTALS, REQUIRING DOCUMENTS RELATED TO BUILDING DESIGN
AND MATERIALS, LANDSCAPING DETAIL SCREENING, FENCING, GRADING,
STREETS UTIILTIES, SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING. MOTION WAS SECONDED BY
BRAD FYLE. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
This item will go before the City Council at the second meeting in March.
10. Community Development Director’s Report
Upcoming Special Meeting-Staff reported that there is a Joint City Council/EDA/Planning
Commission special meeting scheduled for 5:15 PM on February 27th to provide an
Embracing Downtown Monticello process update. There was some question about a revised
meeting time of 5:30 PM. Staff agreed to confirm that with the Commission.
CCD Ordinance Rewrite-The ad hoc task force assigned to direct the CCD rewrite met
with Planner Grittman February 10th to determine how to write the ordinance standards.
Charlotte Gabler and Bill Spartz were in attendance. Two workshops were scheduled to
provide for further input in preparing a draft ordinance. The first workshop, scheduled for
4:30 PM on March 6th, will cover permitted and conditional uses to be included within
the CCD. The second workshop, tentatively scheduled for March 20th at 4:30 PM, will
cover other code performance standards. A final draft of the CCD ordinance is expected
to come before the Commission in April or May.
Development Survey-The City received 5 responses out of the 18 development surveys
emailed. Overall the results were favorable, although the clarity of application materials
may need to be reviewed and improved.
Growth Projections-Steve Grittman is preparing a project scope and estimate for
updating the growth projections to be forwarded to the Planning Commission in March.
Ford Project-The City has not received a development stage application.
Housing Statistics-Staff noted that information about current real estate trends was
included in the agenda packets.
Land Use-Related Legislation-A summary of recent land-use related legislation making
its way through this year’s legislative session was also included in the packet.
11. Adjourn
BILL SPARTZ MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:46 PM. MOTION WAS
SECONDED BY BARRY VOIGHT. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Recorder: Kerry T. Burri __
Approved: March 6, 2012
Attest: ___________________________________________
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (A) Findings, Purpose, and Effect
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 189
4.5 Signs
(A) Findings, Purpose, and Effect
(1) Findings
The City finds:
(a) Exterior signs have a substantial impact on the character and quality of the
environment.
(b) Signs provide an important medium through which individuals may convey a
variety of messages.
(c) Signs can create traffic hazards and aesthetic concerns, thereby threatening
the public health, safety and welfare.
(d) The City's zoning regulations include the regulation of signs in an effort to
provide adequate means of expression and to promote the economic viability
of the business community, while protecting the City and its citizens from a
proliferation of signs of a type, size, location and character that would
adversely impact upon the aesthetics of the community and threaten the
health, safety and welfare of the community. The regulation of the physical
characteristics of signs within the City has had a positive impact on traffic
safety and the appearance of the community.
(2) Purpose and Intent
(a) It is not the purpose or intent of Section 4.5 to regulate the message displayed
on any sign; nor is it the purpose or intent of this section to regulate any
building design or any display not defined as a sign, or any sign which cannot
be viewed from outside a building.
(b) The purpose and intent of Section 4.5 is to:
(i) Regulate the number, location, size, type, illumination and other physical
characteristics of signs within the City in order to promote the public
health, safety and welfare.
(ii) Maintain, enhance and improve the aesthetic environment of the City by
preventing visual clutter that is harmful to the appearance of the
community.
(iii) Improve the visual appearance of the City while providing for effective
means of communication, consistent with constitutional guarantees and
the City's goals of public safety and aesthetics.
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (C) Permit Not Required
Page 190 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(iv) Provide for fair and consistent enforcement of the sign regulations set
forth herein under the zoning authority of the City.
(3) Effect
A sign may be erected, mounted, displayed or maintained in the City if it is in
conformance with the provisions of this ordinance. The effect of Section 4.5, as
more specifically set forth herein, is to:
(a) Allow a wide variety of sign types in commercial zones, and a more limited
variety of signs in other zones, subject to the standards set forth in Section
4.5.
(b) Allow certain small, unobtrusive signs incidental to the principal use of a site
in all zones when in compliance with the requirements of Section 4.5.
(c) Prohibit signs whose location, size, type, illumination or other physical
characteristics negatively affect the environment and where the
communication can be accomplished by means having a lesser impact on the
environment and the public health, safety and welfare.
(d) Provide for the administration and enforcement of the provisions of Section
4.5.
(B) Permit Required
No sign shall be erected, altered, improved, reconstructed, maintained or moved in the
City without first securing a sign permit from the City:
(1) The content of the message or speech displayed on the sign shall not be reviewed
or considered in determining whether to approve or deny a sign permit.
(2) Application for a sign permit shall be in conformance with the requirements of
Section 2.4(K), Sign Permits:
(C) Permit Not Required
The following signs shall not require a permit and are allowed in addition to those signs
allowed by Sections 4.5(I) and 4.5(J) of this section. These exemptions, however, shall
not be construed as relieving the owner of the sign from the responsibility of its erection
and maintenance, and its compliance with the provisions of this section or any other law
or ordinance regulating the same.
Section 2.4(K) Sign
Permits
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (C) Permit Not Required
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 191
(1) The changing of the display surface on a painted or printed sign only. This
exemption, however, shall apply only to poster replacement and/or on site
changes involving sign painting on a surface other than the surface of the
building.
(2) Permanent signs two (2) square feet or less in size.
(3) One (1) sign per property in residential districts not to exceed four (4) square feet.
(4) All noncommercial signs are permitted on private property in any zoning district
with the express consent of the owner or occupant of such property. In a State
general election year, noncommercial signs of any size may be posted in any
number forty-six (46) days before the State primary in a State general election
year until ten (10) days following the State general election. Election signs
posted in connection with elections held at times other than those regulated by
Minn. Stat. 211B.035 shall not be posted more than 13 weeks prior to the election
and shall be removed by the party responsible for the erection of the sign or the
property owner within ten (10) days after the election.
(5) Official and Public signs.
(6) One (1) sign shall be allowed per street frontage when a property is offered for
sale or lease, provided that:
(a) Within residential zoning districts (see table 3-1), no sign shall exceed twelve
(12) square feet in area and six (6) feet in height for single-family, two-
family, townhouse, and quadraminium units; or thirty two (32) square feet in
area or eight (8) feet in height for multi-family or institutional uses.
(b) For non-residential zoning districts (see table 3-1), as well as for any parcel
larger than ten (10) acres in any zoning district, signs may be up to ninety six
(96) square feet in area or twelve (12) feet in height as defined in this
ordinance. One (1) additional such sign shall be allowed for any street
frontage which exceeds one thousand (1,000) linear feet. For the purposes of
this section, frontage on any right of way, including local streets, County or
State Highways, or I-94 shall constitute a ―frontage‖, regardless of access.
(7) Sandwich board signs are allowed within all business zoning districts (see table 3-
1) provided that:
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (D) Prohibited Signs
Page 192 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(a) Not more than one (1) sign is allowed per principal building except that one
sign is allowed per tenant within a principal building having two (2) or more
tenants each with an exclusive exterior entrance.
(b) The sign shall only be displayed when the business is open to the public.
(c) Except in the CCD district, the sign shall be placed only on the business
property and shall be located within required principal building setbacks, or
encroaching into required setback areas a maximum of five (5) feet, and shall
not be placed on any vehicle.
(d) The signs shall be located so as to maintain a minimum five (5) foot
pedestrian walkway and so as not to obstruct vehicular traffic.
(e) The sign shall be set back a minimum of two (2) feet from the back of curb of
a public street or private drive aisle.
(f) The sign shall conform to the following height and area requirements:
(i) Height: Five (5) feet.
(ii) Area: Six (6) square feet.
(g) For sandwich board signs within the CCD district, sandwich board signs may
be located in accordance with the provisions of subpart (c) above. In addition,
such signs may be placed upon the sidewalk or boulevard portion of a public
right-of-way upon the issuance of an annual permit in accordance with the
provisions and process of Section 2.4(K) of this ordinance.
(D) Prohibited Signs
The following signs are prohibited:
(1) Any sign, signal, marking or device which purports to be or is an imitation of or
resembles any official traffic control device or railroad sign or signal, or
emergency vehicle signs, or which attempts to direct the movement of traffic or
which hides from view or interferes with the effectiveness of any official traffic
control device or any railroad sign or signal.
(2) All off premises signs greater than six (6) square feet in area.
(3) Flashing signs.
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (E) Nonconforming Signs and Uses
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 193
(4) Roof signs.
(5) Rotating signs.
(6) Shimmering signs.
(7) Signs which move or imitate movement, except for dynamic scrolling signs as
defined in this ordinance.
(8) Signs painted, attached or in any other manner affixed to trees or similar natural
surfaces, or attached to utility poles, bridges, towers, or similar public structures.
(9) Off Premises Signs:
(a) Off premise signs existing as non-conforming structures at the time of
adoption of this ordinance greater than six (6) square feet in area shall be
considered a principal use of property.
(b) Annual permits are required for all off premises signs. Off premises signs
shall be removed as a condition of construction of another principal use upon
the property or platting or subdivision approval for the land on which it is
located.
(10) Abandoned signs.
(E) Nonconforming Signs and Uses
(1) Signs: A non-conforming sign lawfully existing upon the effective date of this
ordinance as denoted in Section 1.4 shall be regulated in accordance with Chapter
6 of this ordinance.
(2) Uses: When the principal use of land is legally non-conforming under Chapter 6
of this ordinance, all existing or proposed signs in conjunction with that land use
shall be considered conforming if they are in compliance with the sign provisions
for the most restrictive zoning district in which the principal use is allowed.
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (H) General Provisions
Page 194 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(3) When a sign is considered to be non-conforming due to size, location, or other
factor, but represents a conforming use of land, such sign may be continued,
including through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance, or improvement,
but not including expansion, unless it is considered to be abandoned as defined by
this ordinance. When a non-conforming sign has been damaged to an extent of
50% or more of its market value, such sign shall be considered to be abandoned if
no building or sign permit has been applied for within 180 days of the date of
damage.
(F) Enforcement and Penalties
Section 4.5 shall be administered and enforced in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 7 of this ordinance.
(G) Substitution
The owner of any sign which is otherwise allowed by Section 4.5 of this ordinance may
substitute non-commercial copy in lieu of any other commercial or non-commercial
copy. This substitution of copy may be made without any additional approval or
permitting. The purpose of this provision is to prevent any inadvertent favoring of
commercial speech over non-commercial speech, or favoring of any particular non-
commercial message over any other non-commercial message. This provision prevails
over any more specific provision to the contrary.
(H) General Provisions
(1) Accessory Structures
Except as provided for by Section 4.5(D)(9), all signs shall be considered
accessory structures.
(2) Setbacks
All freestanding signs shall be set back fifteen (15) feet from any property line
abutting a public right-of-way and five (5) feet from any side or rear property line.
No sign may be located within a drainage and utility easement.
(3) Standards Adopted
The design and construction standards as set forth in Chapter 4 of the 1997 edition
of the Uniform Sign Code as may be amended, are hereby adopted.
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (H) General Provisions
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 195
(4) Electrical Signs
The installation of electrical signs shall be subject to the State's
Electrical Code. Electrical service to such signs shall be
underground.
(5) Approval
No sign shall be attached or be allowed to hang from any building
until all necessary wall and roof attachments have been approved
by the Community Development Department.
(6) Sign Interference
No signs, guys, stays or attachments shall be erected, placed or
maintained on trees nor interfere with any electric light, power,
telephone or telegraph wires or the supports thereof.
(7) Illuminated Signs
Illuminated signs shall be shielded to prevent lights from being
directed at oncoming traffic in such brilliance that it impairs the
vision of the driver and may not interfere with or obscure traffic
signs or signals. Lighting may not illuminate any adjacent
properties, buildings, or streets.
(8) Permit Display
Signs requiring permits shall display in a conspicuous manner the
permit sticker or sticker number.
(9) Placement
No sign or sign structure shall be erected or maintained that
prevents free ingress or egress from any door, window or fire
escape. No sign or sign structure shall be attached to a standpipe
or fire escape.
(10) Structure
A freestanding sign or sign structure constructed so that the faces
are not back to back, shall not have an angle separating the faces
exceeding thirty (30) degrees unless the total area of both sides
added together does not exceed the maximum allowable sign area
for that district.
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (H) General Provisions
Page 196 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(11) Square Footage Calculation (Total Area = A x B):
(a) For wall signs, the area of a sign shall be that area within the marginal lines
created by the sign surface which bears the advertisement or, in the case of
messages, figures or symbols attached directly to the part of a building, which
is included in the smallest rectangular figure which can be made to
circumscribe the message, figure, or symbol displayed thereon:
(b) For monument signs, area shall be calculated as for wall signs. Structural
members of the sign, including supports or other decorative features shall not
be considered as a part of the measured sign area:
(c) For pylon signs, the entire area of the sign face or cabinet shall be considered
as a part of the measured sign area. Structural supports, provided that they
have no message or other graphics, shall be exempt from the area calculation.
(12) Height
The top of a wall sign, including its superstructure, if any, shall be no higher than
the roof of the building to which such sign may be attached.
(13) Landscaping
A site plan shall be submitted as a part of any application for a freestanding sign
which includes plans for the landscaping of the area near the sign, and which
demonstrates that the sign will complement the existing or proposed general site
landscaping of the property.
(14) Vehicle Fuel Facilities
Signs for vehicle fuel facilities shall be regulated by the sign provisions for the
zoning district in which the facility is located, except that within a freestanding
sign, an area not to exceed sixteen (16) square feet shall be allowed for continuous
display (no flashing, scrolling or other animation) of electronic or non-electronic
changeable copy identifying current fuel prices in accordance with Minnesota
state statutes section 239.751.
(15) Window Signs
Window signs are not considered a part of the maximum sign area otherwise
allowed under Section 4.5 of this ordinance and do not require a permit.
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (H) General Provisions
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 197
(16) Changeable Copy Signs
(a) Changeable copy signs are subject to the following additional regulations:
(i) Signs must be permanently anchored to the structure.
(ii) Signs must be incorporated within the overall sign structure for both
monument and pylon signs and must be consistent in design with the sign
structure.
(b) Within commercial and industrial districts and for civic and institutional uses
including, but not limited to, public school facilities, hospital and medical
facilities, municipal facilities and places of public assembly, one (1)
changeable copy sign shall be allowed per site provided that the area of the
sign not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the allowable sign area or fifty
(50) square feet, whichever is less, for a freestanding or wall sign. The area
of this sign shall be counted against the maximum sign area for the building,
except where the property owner has agreed to forgo the use of temporary
signs in accordance Section 4.5(I)(2) in which case the area of the changeable
copy sign shall be allowed in excess of the maximum sign area.
(17) Time and Temperature Signs
Within commercial and industrial zoning districts, an area not to exceed sixteen
(16) square feet within a freestanding or wall sign shall be allowed for display of
an electronic time and temperature sign subject to the sign provisions for the
zoning district in which the sign is located.
(18) Projecting Signs
Projecting signs may be allowed in commercial districts provided that:
(a) There is a minimum of eight (8) feet of clearance under the base of the sign to
the ground below.
(b) The sign does not project more than five (5) feet beyond the wall to which it
is mounted, may not project over any vehicular drive aisle or traveled portion
of a public or private street and except in the CCD, Central Community
District may not project over a public right-of-way.
(c) The area of the projecting sign is not more than fifty (50) percent of the
maximum area allowed for an individual wall sign in the respective zoning
district in Section 4.5(J).
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (H) General Provisions
Page 198 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(19) Dynamic Displays
(a) Findings
Based on studies related to the use of dynamic sign displays and driver
distraction, the City finds that dynamic signs, as defined by the zoning
ordinance, have a unique potential to create driver distraction, a major cause
of traffic crashes. As a result, the City has adopted special regulations that
relate to such signs. These regulations shall apply to all proposed dynamic
signage in the City, whether new or existing, conforming or non-conforming
at the time of adoption of this ordinance.
(b) Regulations governing Dynamic Sign Displays
(i) Dynamic sign displays shall have messages that change instantaneously,
and do not fade, dissolve, blink, or appear to simulate motion in any way.
Prohibited blinking signs shall include signs which are displayed as
continuous solid messages for less than the time required by subpart (iii)
of this subsection below. The exception to this regulation is the
allowance of messages that appear to scroll horizontally across the sign,
but are otherwise in compliance with the requirements of this ordinance,
including the definition of ―scrolling signs‖.
(ii) Dynamic sign displays shall not be permitted in any Residential zoning
district.
(iii) Dynamic sign displays shall be permanent signs.
(iv) No dynamic sign display shall change more than one time per three (3)
second period; time and temperature displays may change as frequently as
once every three (3) seconds.
(v) Dynamic sign displays shall be no brighter than other illuminated signs in
the same district.
(vi) Dynamic sign displays shall be designed to freeze the display in the event
of malfunction, and the owner shall discontinue the display immediately
upon malfunction, or upon notice from the City that the display violates
the City’s regulations.
(vii) Applicants for dynamic sign displays shall sign a license agreement
supplemental to the building permit agreeing to operation of a sign in
conformance with these regulations. Violation of these regulations shall
result in forfeiture of the license, and the City shall be authorized to
arrange disconnection of electrical service to the facility.
(viii) No dynamic sign display shall be permitted to be located in a yard or on
the side of a building which abuts a residentially zoned parcel.
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (I) Temporary Signs
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 199
(20) Design and Materials Standards for Signs in Commercial Districts,
Industrial Districts, the CCD District, PUDs, and Performance Based Mixed
Use Development
(a) In General
The design and materials of any sign shall be consistent with the building
materials requirements of the district in which the sign is located, and shall be
the same as, or compatible with, the materials and design of the principal
building(s) on the property.
(b) Specific Materials for Pylon Signs
All exposed pole or post structures must be wrapped or faced with stucco,
architectural metal, brick or stone consistent with building architecture.
(I) Temporary Signs
(1) For property in a Business District or an Industrial District (see table 3-1), the use
of commercial temporary sign devices shall not exceed forty (40) days per
calendar year per building. Not more than one (1) temporary sign device per
building shall be displayed upon a property at any one time. The area of
temporary sign devices shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet.
(2) In cases where properties forego, in writing, temporary signage allowed by
Section 4.5(I)(1) above, an additional permanent message board sign up to fifty
(50) square feet in area shall be allowed. Such sign may be incorporated into a
property’s freestanding sign or the building as additional wall sign area.
Freestanding signs shall be subject to the height limitations of the applicable
zoning district.
(3) Subject to other provisions of Section 4.5(I), one (1) additional temporary sign
device shall be permitted for a business on a one-time basis for a period of up to
forty (40) days to be utilized within six (6) months of the first day of the business
opening to the public. Such signage shall not be limited by the provisions of
Sections 4.5(I)(2).
(4) Businesses or organizations with their activities located in the CCD, Central
Business District, may display temporary, off-premise signs by express permit
issued by the City Council or the Council’s designee where access to commercial
areas requires directional signage from the City’s arterial roads. Signs allowed
under this section shall be considered to be in addition to any other sign
allowances, including permanent signage, other on-site temporary signs, or
―sandwich board‖ signs displayed pursuant to Section 4.5(C)(7). Signs allowed
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (J) District Regulations
Page 200 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
under this section may, at the discretion of the Council, be permitted under the
following conditions:
(a) Off-premise, temporary signs shall be no more than four (4) square feet in
area.
(b) Off-premise temporary signs shall be no more than three (3) feet in height.
(c) Off-premise temporary signs shall be limited to no more than one (1) sign
every seventy-five (75) lineal feet of street frontage, but no more than three
(3) signs per parcel.
(d) Notwithstanding other regulations to the contrary, such signs may be placed
upon the public sidewalk within a City street right of way. Any such sign
placed on the public sidewalk shall be located so as to avoid impeding
pedestrian traffic, and to avoid visual interference with vehicular traffic.
(e) An application for an off-premise, temporary sign shall be accompanied by a
written statement of permission from the owner of the private property on
which the sign is to located. Such statement shall include an express grant of
permission for City inspectors to enter the property for the purpose of
inspecting and/or removing said signs.
(f) An application for signs subject to the provisions of this section may be made
for a single period of display, or in the alternative, the City may grant
approval for annual license for the display of such signs in accordance with
Section 2.4(K). Separate fees may be established for single-period or annual-
period permits.
(g) Eligible days for the display of signs subject to this section shall be Thursday,
Friday, Saturday, or Sunday only.
(J) District Regulations
In addition to the signs allowed by Section 4.5(C) and Section 4.5(I), the following
signs shall be allowed within the specific zoning districts:
(1) Within residential zoning districts (see table 3-1), the following additional
regulations apply:
(a) Except for the uses specified in Sections 4.5(J)(1)(b) and 4.5(J)(1)(c) below,
not more than one (1) sign shall be allowed provided that:
(i) The area of the sign shall not exceed four (4) square feet.
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (J) District Regulations
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 201
(ii) Freestanding signs shall be limited to a maximum height of four (4) feet.
(b) In addition to the sign allowed by Section 4.5(J)(1)(a) above, one (1)
residential area identification sign shall be allowed. Such sign shall not
exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area and eight (8) feet in height.
(c) Government buildings and structures, public, quasi-public or private
recreation buildings, public parks and recreation areas, public and private
educational institutions limited to accredited elementary, middle or senior
high schools, and religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples and
synagogues shall be allowed two (2) institutional identification signs not
exceeding seventy-five (75) square feet in area and eight (8) feet in height.
(2) Within business and industrial zoning districts (see table 3-1), the following
additional regulations shall apply:
(a) Total Area of Signs
The total area of all signs (with the exclusion of freestanding signs as may be
allowed by this code) displayed on a lot shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent
of the total building facade fronting not more than two (2) public streets.
(b) Freestanding Signs
(i) Unless otherwise specified in this section, one (1) sign is allowed per lot.
The area of a freestanding sign may not exceed one hundred (100) square
feet each side with a maximum height of twenty-two (22) feet.
(ii) If a monument, rather than pylon sign is utilized, an additional one
hundred (100) square feet of area beyond the total area calculated in
Section 4.5(J)(2)(a) above, devoted to wall, canopy or marquee signs
shall be granted.
(iii) For shopping centers greater than one hundred and fifty thousand
(150,000) square feet of aggregate building square footage and greater
than twenty (20) acres in site area, two (2) freestanding signs may be
permitted. Two (2) pylon signs may be constructed or, as an alternative,
one (1) pylon and one (1) monument sign may be constructed. When the
latter option is chosen, the monument sign shall be no greater than
fourteen (14) feet in height nor more than one hundred (100) square feet
in area. The pylon sign may be no greater than twenty-five (25) feet in
height and three hundred (300) square feet in area.
The Freeway Bonus
Sign Overlay District
allows for additional
signage in specific
commercial and
industrial areas
[Section 3.7(F)]
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.5 Signs
Subsection (J) District Regulations
Page 202 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(c) Wall, Canopy, or Marquee Signs
(i) Wall, canopy, projecting, and marquee signs shall be consistent with the
maximum area requirements of Section 4.5(J)(2)(a).
(ii) Wall, canopy and marquee signs are permitted on any building facade
except those which abut properties zoned for residential use.
(d) Directional signage
In addition to the sign allowed by Section 4.5(J)(2)(b)(i), directional signage
may be allowed on site in an amount not to exceed three (3) signs with an
individual square footage maximum of ten (10) square feet each and thirty
(30) total square feet.
(e) Multiple Occupancy Commercial And Industrial Buildings
When a single principal building is devoted to two (2) or more commercial or
industrial principal uses, signs shall be allowed subject to review and approval
of the Community Development Department based upon the following
requirements:
(i) The maximum individual sign sizes for multiple occupancy buildings and
individual businesses that may display a sign shall not exceed the
maximum provisions in the same zoning district in Section 4.5(J).
(ii) Commercial retail, office, or mixed use multiple occupancy buildings
may display a freestanding sign consistent with the applicable zoning
district provisions in Section 4.5(J).
(iii) Except as provided by window, changeable copy, or temporary signs in
this ordinance, individual tenants of a multiple occupancy building within
a commercial or industrial zoning district shall not display separate wall,
canopy, or marquee signs unless the tenant's business has an exclusive
exterior entrance and subject to the following requirements:
1. Each sign shall be limited to the maximum wall sign size permitted in
the applicable zoning district provisions in Section 4.5(J).
2. The sign shall be located only on the exterior wall of the tenant space
to which the sign permit is issued, but are not required to face a public
street.
3. A comprehensive sign plan is submitted that includes all of the
following information:
a. A site plan to scale showing the location of lot lines, buildings,
structures, parking areas, existing and proposed signs, and any
other physical features of the area included within the proposed
comprehensive sign plan.
CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS
Section 4.7 Transitional Features
Subsection (A) Purpose and Intent
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 203
b. Elevations to scale of buildings included within the
comprehensive sign plan including the location of existing or
proposed wall, canopy, or marquee signs.
c. To scale plans for all existing and proposed signs of any type
included within the comprehensive sign plan indicating area,
dimensions, height, materials, colors, and means of illumination
(if any).
4. No permit shall be issued for a new or replacement sign for an
individual tenant except upon a determination by the Community
Development Department that it is consistent with the approved
comprehensive sign plan.
(3) In a PUD, Planned Unit Development District, signing restrictions shall be based
upon the individual uses and structures contained in the complex. Signs shall be in
compliance with the restrictions applied in the most restrictive zoning district in
which the use is allowed.
4.6 Underground Utilities
All utilities within or serving new development [e.g. cable television, electrical
(excluding transformers), gas, sewer, telephone, and water lines] shall be placed
underground.
4.7 Transitional Features
(A) Purpose and Intent
Transitional features are architectural elements or site aspects that must be used to ease
the transition between new development and existing structures and community
character. It is the intent of these standards to:
(1) Blend land use types throughout the City to minimize visual conflicts;
(2) Limit the excessive consumption of land though the utilization of large vegetated
buffers to separate potentially conflicting use types; and
(3) Limit interruptions in vehicular and pedestrian connections created by efforts to
segregate uses.
2011INTERMSIGNLISTS
PERMIT#ADDRESS BUSINESSNAME OWNER'SNAME E-MAIL MISCNOTES
2011-00002 4300SchoolBlvd ElkAgencyInsurance KentKjellberg
2011-00030 141BroadwayE LibertyTax KenHoelker
2011-00041 800BroadwayE MiddleSchool CandiceBenoit
2011-00042 9361CedarSt GreatClips MikeKrutzig
2011-00045 261BroadwayE WomenofToday StephenConroy
2011-00052 9440StHwy#25 KwikTripInc SandeeHindermann ctyank@hotmail.com
2011-00055 520WalnutSt WrecklessDrivingAcademy BullseyeProperties
2011-00062 1220StHwy#25 PizzaRanch MarkWarnert OpeningSoon
2011-00068 316PineSt Bridgewater/TDS TomOllig thomas.ollig@tdstelecom.com
2011-00081 1200StHwy#25 PizzaRanch MarkWarnert GrandOpening
2011-00087 1001StHwy#25 WestMetro JeffSell
2011-00091 812GolfCourseRd RiverCitySigns PatSawatzke
2011-00093 101E3rdSt FindersKeepersGift&Consignment CherylWolff cwolfftravel@hotmail.com
2011-00094 100DundasRd MartiesFarmService BarbBrion info@martiesfarmservice.com
2011-00099 9395StHwy#25 CulversResturant DavidLoos(?)DJL93@comcast.net
2011-00104 254BroadwayW BeefOBradys BarryFluth/ToddTaylor monticellobeefs@yahoo.com
2011-00103 213StHwy25 SweetDreams MarnFlicker mmflick@hotmail.com
2011-00109 512PineSt TheStation StandardIron debcox83@yahoo.com
2011-00120 206W4thSt DohertyStaffing CargillKitchenSolutions dhughes@dohertystaffing.com
2011-00140 307ChelseaRd HoglundBody&Equipment WayneHoglund hr@hoglundbus.com
2011-00162 518CedarSt SunlifeTanning&Treasures BullseyeProperties sunlife05@gmail.com
2011-00163512CedarStRevitalizeMeSalon&SpaBullseyeProperties amhj4hansen@live.com Samebuildingasabove-doeseachtentantneedapermit?
2011-00187 9749HartBlvd AstSports JamiePaulson jamie.astsports@tds.net
2011-00232 206ChelseaRd WrightWayQuilt&Sew RochelleGarvey rochellegarvey@yahoo.com
2011-00234 1001HartBlvd MonticelloClinic LindaDircks linda.dircks@bufflaoclinic.com
2011-00287 1107HartBlvd NewRiverPhyscian'sClinic JoniPawelk joni.pawelk@newrivermedical.com
2011-00321 123W7thSt HolidayStationStores RonaldErickson,CEO mary.seifert@holidaycompanies.com
2011-00356 611WalnutSt BurschTravel PatrickO'Donnell johng@burschtravel.com
2011-00345 4272SchoolBlvd Lee'sTaeKwonDo MartyKjellberg lee@martielawfirm.com
2011-00344 4105CedarSt MusicMaster RickBrendsell newsongmusicco@yahoo.com
2011-00448 4093CedarSt Sprint RickBrendsell cellularplus@tds.net
2011-00488 1543East7thSt FantasticSams TriciaMotz sziessman@comcast.net
2011-00494 4111CedarSt MonticelloTire&Auto RickBrendsell montitire@tds.net
2011-00500 9371CedarSt DoOvers MikeKrutzig doovers@tds.net
2011-00524 9311CedarSt ChinaBuffet MikeKrutzig sabrinaJiang2008@yahoo.com
2011-00576 1117CedarSt,Suite130NAPA FredMenth fredmenth@msn.com
2011-00575 224W3rdSt NAPA FredMenth fredmenth@msn.com
2011-00582 9261CedarSt VerisonWireless MikeKrutzig sbakken@selectcomm.net
Exhibit 5E
City Allowed By Number per Location Calendar Days Permit Required Multi-Tenant Allowance
Buffalo By Building 1 30 YES NO
Becker By Business No Regulation 60 YES NO
Big Lake By Parcel 1 60 YES NO
Elk River By Parcel 1 90 YES NO
St. Michael By Business 1 - 100 feet apart 90 YES NO
Neighboring Community Survey - Temporary Sign Regulations
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
1
10.ConsiderationofapprovingOrdinance#553rezoningaportionofLot1,Block2,
OakwoodIndustrialPark,fromI-2(HeavyIndustrial)toB-2(LimitedBusiness
District).Applicant:QuarryChurch (NAC/AS)
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND:
Property:Legal:Lot1,Block2,OakwoodIndustrialPark
Address:100ChelseaRoad
Thesubjectsiteislocatedatthesoutheastquadrantof
OakwoodDriveandChelseaRoad
PlanningCaseNumber:2012-002
Request(s):RezoningthesubjectparcelfromI-2,HeavyIndustrialtoB-2,Limited
Business
DeadlineforDecision:April15th,2012 (60days)
LandUseDesignation:“PlacestoShop”
ZoningDesignation:I-2,HeavyIndustrial
ThepurposeoftheI-2,HeavyIndustrialDistrictisto
providefortheestablishmentofheavyindustrialand
manufacturingdevelopmentandusewhichbecauseofthe
natureoftheproductorcharacterofactivityrequires
isolationfromresidentialorcommercialuse.
CurrentSiteUse:The3.7acresiteisoccupiedbyseveralstructuresallof
whichrelatetoaformerlumberyarduse.Thepropertyis
presentlyunoccupied.
SurroundingLandUses:
North:Formerbowlingalley(presentlyownedbytheCity),zoned
B-2,LimitedBusiness
East:Lightindustrialuse,zonedI-2,HeavyIndustrial
South:AlternativeLearningProgram(interimuse),zonedI-2,
HeavyIndustrial(guided“PlacestoShop”)
West:Vacant,zonedB-4,RegionalBusiness
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
2
ProjectDescription:Theapplicantswishtorezonethepropertytomatchits
guidedcommerciallandusedesignation(“Placesto
Shop”).Theformerlumberyardbuildingsarepresently
unoccupied.Theapplicantsexpecttooccupytheproperty
withchurchadministrativeofficesinthenearterm,
eventuallymovingtheirworshipandotheractivitiesto
propertyovertime.
RequirementsforZoningAmendments-Chapter2.4B(5)ApprovalCriteria
Recommendationsanddecisionsonzoningamendmentsshallbebasedonconsideration
ofthefollowingcriteria:
(a)Whethertheproposedamendmentcorrectsanerrorintheoriginaltextormap;or
(b)Whethertheproposedamendmentaddressesneedsarisingfromachanging
condition,trend,orfactaffectingthesubjectpropertyandsurroundingarea.
(c)Whethertheproposedamendmentisconsistentwithachievingthegoalsand
objectivesoutlinedintheComprehensivePlan.
Thesubjectsiteisguidedforcommercialuseandmorespecifically,“PlacestoShop”.
Suchguidedlandusedesignationisnotconsistentwiththesite’spresentI-2,Heavy
Industrialzoningdesignation.Inthisregard,therezoningwouldbeconsistentwiththe
goalsandobjectivesoftheCity’sComprehensivePlan(bycorrectinganexistingzoning
inconsistency),item“c”above.
AccordingtotheComprehensivePlan,“PlacestoShop”designatelocationsthatareor
canbedevelopedwithbusinessesinvolvedwiththesaleofgoodsandservices.“Places
toShop”alsoguidelandusesthatarebothlocalandregionalinnatureandmayinclude
officesforservicebusinesses.
Theparcel’sdesignationas“PlacestoShop”inthe2008ComprehensivePlanwasdueto
twoprimaryfactors.Theparcel’suseatthattimeasalumber/buildingsupplyfacility
wasconsideredcommercial/retailinnature.Thecommercialdesignationallowedtheuse
tocontinuewithoutnon-conformityintermsoflanduse.Secondly,theComprehensive
PlanrecognizedtheparcelsbothnorthandsouthofChelseaalongEdmonsonasa
“gateway”fromtheeasttothecommercialsectorlyingalongHighway25.Thus,both
sidesofChelseaimmediatelyeastofEdmonsonwereguided“PlacestoShop”.
FutureSiteDevelopment
Aspreviouslynoted,theapplicantsexpecttooccupythesiteasachurchfacility,
beginningbymovingtheiradministrativeofficefunctionstotheproperty.Itshouldbe
notedthatthatuseofthesiteforofficeusesiscurrentlypermittedintheI-2districtand
norezoningisnecessarytoaccommodatethefirstintendedphaseforQuarry.Ifthe
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
3
requestedrezoningisapproved,futureuseofthesitemustbeconsistentwiththe
provisionsoftheB-2,LimitedBusinesszoningdistrict.
ThepurposeoftheB-2districtistoprovideforlowintensityretailorserviceoutlets
whichdealdirectlywiththecustomerforwhomthegoodsorservicesarefurnished.The
usesallowedinthedistrictaretoprovidegoodsandservicesonalimitedcommunity
marketscaleandlocatedinareaswhicharewellservedbycollectororarterialstreet
facilitiesattheedgeofresidentialdistricts.IntheB-2District,bothofficesand“places
ofpublicassembly”suchaschurchworshipcentersarepermitteduses.
Asapotentialowneranduserofacommerciallyzonedsite,QuarryChurchshouldbe
awareoftheusesandimpactsofothersurroundingindustrialandcommercialsites.These
couldincludehigherintensitylandusessuchasrestaurants,hotels,andmanufacturing
uses,whichgeneratelargervolumesoftrafficandotherlanduseimpacts.Itshouldalso
benotedthatreligiousinstitutionsareoftenseekingveryactivecommercial/industrial
neighborhoodsduespecificallytotraffic,non-traditionalpopulations.
Futuredevelopment(redevelopment)ofthesitewillbesubjecttositeandbuildingplan
reviewprocedures.PlacesofPublicAssemblyarepermittedinthedistrict.Intheregard,
futuredevelopmentplanswillbesubjecttoreviewandrecommendationbythePlanning
CommissionandapprovalbytheCityCouncil.
IndustrialandEconomicDevelopmentRecommendation
OnTuesday,March6th,theIEDCreviewedthisitem.TheIEDCrecommendeddenialof
therequestforrezoning.TheofficialvoteoftheIEDCwas4-0todeny,withfour
membersabstainingfromthevote.TheIEDC’srecommendationwasbasedonthe
following:
1.Lossofindustrialland.TheIEDCrecognizedthatalthoughsmallinscope,this
requestrepresentscontinuedshiftofindustriallandtocommercialuse.The
group’sroleistosupportindustrialdevelopmentandjobcreationandtherefore
anylossinindustriallandwithintheCityisaconcern.
2.Potentialfutureconflictbetweencommercialandindustriallanduses.Citing
noise,dustandotherheavyindustrialimpacts,thegroupindicatedthatthe
potentialforconflictbetweenthesurroundingI-2usersandthissitewasanother
concern.
PlanningCommissionRecommendation
Nopublictestimonywasofferedduringthepublichearing,withtheexceptionofthat
providedbytheapplicant.PastorMichaelGrosswaspresentrepresentingQuarry
Church.
ThePlanningCommissionersrequestedclarificationfromstaffregardingprovisionsthat
wouldservetomitigatethepotentialconflictsnotedbytheIEDC.Staffexplainedthat
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
4
anycommercialuserwouldberequiredtomeetallexistingordinancestandards,
includingparking,landscapingandperimeterbuffering.Inthiscase,asthedeveloping
parcel,theuserwillhavetoprovidethefullrequiredbuffer.Foracivicorinstitutional
use,thatwillrequirethemaximumamountofbuffering.ChairmanDragstenasked
Quarrytostatefortherecordthatitunderstoodthenatureofthesurroundinguses.The
applicantstatedthattheyunderstoodthispotentialandtheneedtocomplywith
ordinances.
ThePlanningCommissionalsoclarifiedthattherewasaninterveningparcelbetweenthe
I-2propertytothesouthandthesubjectpropertythatwasalsoguidedforcommercial
use.Staffconfirmed.Thatparcel,currentlyoccupiedbytheAlternativeLearning
Programis.76acresinsize.
DecisionAnalysis
In2011,theCityrezonedthe“bowlingalleyparcels”toB-2inadecisiononan
applicationsubmittedbyQuarryChurch.Atthattime,theCityactedproactivelytozone
thepropertyconsistentwiththeComprehensivePlan,whichguidedthatsiteas“Placesto
Shop”andtoaccommodateapotentialsaleofthepropertytothechurch.Thesale
transactiondidnotoccurforfinancialreasons.
ToresponddirectlytotheIEDC’sconcernsregardingindustriallandarea,the
ComprehensivePlanspecificallyrecognizesandsupportstheroleofindustrial
developmentwithinthecommunityandprovidesfornewandexpandedindustrialuses.
TheseareasincludeanexpansionofthecurrentOtterCreekBusinessCampus,an
approximately400acregeneralindustrialareaimmediatelysouthofthecurrentCity
boundary(withintheMOAA),andanareawithinthenorthwestplanningarea.
Additionally,changingpatternsofdevelopmentforindustrialpropertiesmakethe
developmentofnewindustrialareasapriorityduetorequirementsforbetter,higher
volumeaccesscapacity,redundantutilitycapabilities,andmostimportantly,largerland
areas.
Astopotentialconflictsbetweencommercialandindustrialusers,regardlessofthe
specifictypeofcommercialuseronthisparcel,andanycurrentorfutureindustrialusers
onadjacentparceltotheeast,botharerequiredtocomplywithzoningordinancesand
citycodesforbufferyards,noise,dust,outdoorstorage,etc.Thesecodestandardsare
specificallydevelopedtobalancetheimpactsoflanduseswiththeactualneedsand
activitiesoftheuseitself.
ItisalsonotedthateithertheB-3orB-4zoningdistrictswouldalsomeetthe"Placesto
Shop"designationsetbytheComprehensivePlan.However,giventheCity's
strengtheningoftheB-3asanexclusivelyauto-orienteddistrictandthesite'slocation
welloffofHighway25,staffdoesnotbelieveaB-3designationisappropriateforthe
site.“PlacesofPublicAssembly”isnotlistedaseitheraconditionalorprincipalusein
theB-4Districtandwasthusnotrequestedbytheapplicant.AB-2designationatthis
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
5
sitedoesprovideatransitionbetweentheB-3andB-4districtswithintheHighway25
commercialdistrictandtheindustrialdistrictstotheeast.
Inconsideringthisrequest,staffhasoutlinedthreepotentialoptionsfortheCityCouncil.
Option1:Approvetherezoningasrequested,consistentwiththeComprehensive
Planandstaffrecommendation.
Option2:TheCouncilmaycallahearingtoreviewallcommercialzoning
designationsforpotentialsiterezoning.Inthatcase,theCouncilwouldtableaction
onthisrequesttoallowthePlanningCommissiontoholdahearingtoconsiderthe
mostappropriatezoningdistrictfortheparcel.Recommendationresultingfromthe
hearingwouldbeforwardedtotheCouncilforreview.Thedeadlineforagency
actiononthelanduseapplicationsubmittedbyQuarryChurchwouldbeformally
extendedby60days.
Option3:IftheCityCouncilbelievesthatthisparcel,andtheparceltothesouth
(whichisalsodesignatedas“PlacestoShop”),arebettersuitedtoindustrialland
uses,thentheCouncilshouldtableactiononthisrezoningrequest,extendactionon
theapplicant’srequestby60days,andcallforapublichearingtoamendthe
ComprehensivePlanfrom“PlacestoShop”to“PlacestoWork”.Suchhearing
wouldbeheldbythePlanningCommission.Recommendationsresultingfromthe
hearingwouldbeforwardtotheCouncilforreview.
A1.BudgetImpact:ShouldCouncilcallforahearingrelatedtoeitherrezoningor
comprehensiveplanamendmentaction,additionalfeeswillbeincurredfor
hearingnotification.NACwillalsobeinvolvedinanalysisandrecommendation
onsuchaction.
A2.StaffImpact:ImpactstoCouncilactionmayincludeadditionalstafftimein
analyzingandpreparingrecommendationsrelatedtorezoningorcomprehensive
planamendmenthearings.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
ThePlanningCommissionrecommendsAlternative#1below.
1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#553approvingazoningordinanceamendment
rezoningthesubjectpropertyfromI-2(HeavyIndustrial)toB-2(Limited
Business),basedonfindingsoffactasidentifiedinPlanningCommission
resolution2012-023.
2.MotiontotableactiononOrdinance#553forrezoningfromI-2toB-2to:
a.Developfindingsoffactfordenialoftherezoning.
CityCouncilAgenda:03/12/12
6
b.Formallyextendthedeadlineforagencyactionontherequestfor
rezoning.
c.CallforapublichearingforamendmentoftheComprehensivePlanfora
changeinlandusefromcommercialtoindustrialforthesubjectparceland
theparcelimmediatelytothesouth.
3.MotiontotableactiononOrdinance#553forrezoningfromI-2toB-2to:
a.Developfindingsoffactfordenialoftherezoning.
b.Formallyextendthedeadlineforagencyactionontherequestfor
rezoning.
c.CallforapublichearingforrezoningfromI-2toacommercialzoning
designation,B-1,B-2,B-3,orB-4.
C.STAFFRECOMMNDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1forapprovaloftherequestedrezoning,basedonthe
findingsincludedintheattachedresolutionofrecommendationadoptedbythePlanning
Commission.Asnotedinthereportnarrative,therezoningofthesubjectpropertyfrom
industrialtocommercialisconsistentwiththegoalsandobjectivesoftheCity’s
ComprehensivePlan,whichdirectscommercialuseofthesite.
ShouldCouncilelectalternative2or3,staffwilldiscussoptions,includingpotential
alternativelocations,withtheapplicant.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.Ordinance#553–RezoningfromI-2toB-2
B.PlanningCommissionResolution2012-023
C.AerialSiteImage
D.OfficialLandUseMap
E.OfficialZoningMap
ORDINANCENO.553
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
ANORDINANCEREZONINGFROMI-2(HEAVYINDUSTRIAL)TOB-2(LIMITED
BUSINESS)FORAPORTIONOFLOT1,BLOCK2,OAKWOODINDUSTRIALPARK
THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLOHEREBYORDAINS:
Section1.ThefollowinglotisherebyamendedtorezonefromI-2(heavyindustrial)to
B-2(limitedbusiness):
AportionofLot1,Block2,OakwoodIndustrialPark,legallydescribedas
follows:
Lot1,Block2,OakwoodIndustrialPark,accordingtoplatonfile
andofrecordintheOfficeoftheRegisterofDeeds,inandforthe
CountyofWright,StateofMinnesota,exceptthatpartthereof
whichliesEastofalinedrawn331.5feetWestofandparallelto
the.Eastlineofsaidlotasmeasuredatrightanglesthereto,subject
toeasements,roadwaysandconditionsofrecord.
CaptionamendedMay27,1983at8A.M.toexcludetheSouth
100feetoftheabovedescribedtract.
Section2.TheOfficialZoningmapunderTitle10,Section3.1oftheZoningOrdinance
shallbeamendedaccordingly.
Section2.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafterits
passageandpublication.Revisionswillbemadeonlineafteradoptionby
Council.CopiesofthecompleteZoningOrdinanceareavailableonlineand
atMonticelloCityHall.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis12th dayofMarch,2012.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_____________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
VOTINGINFAVOR:
VOTINGINOPPOSITION:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012 –023
Date: March 6, 2012 Resolution No. 2012-023
Motion By: Seconded By:
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO BY REZONING THE
PARCEL IDENTIFIED IN ATTACHMENT “A” FROM “I-2”, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT TO “B-2”, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has adopted a zoning map dividing the City into separate land
use districts; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Map of the City of Monticello is to reflect the official land use goals,
policies, and directions of the City’s Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on March 6, 2012 to receive
public comment on the proposed amendments to the Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report,
which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings
of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The amendment will accommodate the proposed future use of the property.
3. The proposed B-2 zoning district zoning requirements can be met on the property by uses
listed in that district.
3. The amendment will result in a zoning pattern that reflects the intent and direction of the
Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the amendment to the Monticello
Zoning Map as presented.
ADOPTED this 6th day of March 2012, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
By: _______________________________
Rod Dragsten, Chair
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
EXHIBIT A – LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The property to be rezoned by Monticello Planning Commission Resolution 2012 - ___ is legally
described as follows:
£¤10 £¤10
Æÿ25
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5!(81
§¨¦
94
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(3 9
!(106
!(37!(1 3 1
0 0.5 10.25
Miles-
November 1, 2011Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright County, and WSB & Associates. Land Use Plan
Legend
Places to Live
Places to Shop
Places to Work
Places to Recreate
Places for Community
Downtown
Mixed Use
Interchange Planning Area
Urban Reserve
Infrastructure
Rivers and Streams
Public Waters Inventory
Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories)
Potential Greenway
Potential Interchange
Future Bridge
Existing Arterial or Collector Road
Proposed Arterial or Collector Road
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011